HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/04/1991 Park Board PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES
PARR BOARD MEETING
MONDAY
FEBRUARY 4, 1991
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration and Approval of Minutes of January 7, 1991
3. Open Mike
4. Old Business
A. Birch Street School Park Plan/Use Discussion - John
McClellan
B. Lakecrest/Comprehensive Plan/ School District
Prioritization
C. Focus Meeting Update and Discussion
D. Wenzel Farm Properties Update
E. Other Old Business
5. New Business
6. Adjourn
At 8:00 PM following this meeting the Park Board will meet
with the DRB to discuss the following:
A. Park Dedication Ordinance
B. Earl Olson Minor Subdivision
rMO
-4-
PARK BOARD MEETING
January 7, 1991
The regular January meeting of the Lino Lakes Park Board was
called to order at 7:00 PM on Monday January 7, 1991 at Lino
Lakes City Hall by chairman Ray Johnson. Board members in
attendance were Candy Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann,
Ray Johnson, Ken Johnson, Bill Nissen and George Lindy. Staff
in attendance were Don Volk, Director of Public Works, Marty
Asleson, Superintendent of Parks, Rec and Forestry, and
Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary.
Consideration of Minutes - There were no additions or
corrections to the December 5, 1990 meeting. The minutes were
approved as mailed.
Open Mike - Andy Neal, Councilman appeared under open mike
w_ith Mrs. Hill, a resident in the Sunrise Park neighborhood
concerning a problem her children seem to be having at the
Sunrise Park skating rink lately. It seems that her children
have been chased off of the pleasure rinks by other children
who say they are scheduled for ice time. Marty and Don both
addressed Mrs Hill. She was informed that there are ice time
schedules now posted at the warming houses and that there
'—N should be no priorities to anyone on non scheduled ice time.
Also, that if a problem should arise at the rink, and it
can't be handled, to call the police dispatcher and in turn
they will reach either Don or Mart. Another concern of Mrs.
Hill and Mr. Neal was that they think that the lights at the
rink are on all night. Marty explained that the maintenance
people start working at 4:00 AM to flood the rinks, and also
the rinks are maintained and cleared at night after the rinks
are closed, so it may appear that the lights are on longer
than needed. However, he will look into the matter and see
that the lights are not left on when they are not needed.
Old Business:
A. Wenzel Farms Property - Kirk Corson of Hokanson
Development returned with his new park dedication
concept for the Wenzel Farm Development. His new plan
showed .9 acres of trail winding through the proposed
area where the townhouses will be , going to the east
and south down and around the proposed dedicated park
area that sits at the southwest corner of the plat.
This area would be 2.6 acres. Mr. Corson also showed
photos of the proposed park land. ( The Wenzel Farms
Property development will be a three phase
development.) Ray Johnson stated that he was not
convinced that this is the best area for a park as it
seems to be so far away from the population density
,�• (approximately 1/3 to 1/2 mile) from the townhouses,
PAGE 1
Elm Street.) The rest of the board agreed. They all
expressed a desire to see a park more centrally
located in the development. All the board members
also agreed that the trail system should stay as was
proposed. They feel a major consideration should be
an area for a tot lot or play area , as opposed to
taking the cash instead of park land dedication as
was also suggested during this discussion. Marty
suggested that this area should be approximately (1)
acre. Ray Johnson called for a proposal from the
board. George Lindy proposed that Mr. Corson try to
incorporate the general area of lots 17-18-19 and 20
of block 1, and possibly some of the green area by
the townhomes into a park area. Mr. Corson
explained that they will do their best to satisfy the
desires of the board, and return with a new plan.
B. Lakecrest Development - Jeff Joyer and Ron Mikolai
who represent the sellers of the proposed Lakecrest
Development appeared and informed the board that
there is also a third parcel of property available
for sale now. That being Outlot K, or the 7.46 acre
parcel directly west of outlots H & J currently being
considered. Also in attendance were approximately 35
residents of the area. This group was represented by
Mr. Ben Rosene and Mr.Paul Brand, both reside on E.
Shadow Lake Drive. They presented a petition to the
park board. It was signed by over 200 residents from
180 homes in the area. They state that there are
presently 183 children of approximate pre school age.
The petition was in support of the purchase of the
available park land, and several people pledged a
dollar figure to contribute to equipment, etc. Those
in attendance voiced the opinion that they would
prefer to see a smaller, less noisy park, geared more
toward the younger people who wouldn't need ice rinks
or ball fields, etc. Ben Benson, also a resident of
E. Shadow Lake Drive who was in attendance suggested
that Ray Johnson explain exactly what the procedure
is before a park is developed. Ray did so, and also
explained that the biggest issue with the purchase of
park property at this time is money. Pointing out
recent budget cut backs. George Lindy explained that
the park board has been searching for a large piece
of land in the southern portion of the City, but the
park board is working with a very limited budget.
Paul Brand suggested that money shouldn't be the only
point of interest. That the purchase of the property
now would be a positive step to prevent a potential
accident that could happen when kids try to cross the
very busy Birch Street." Let's fix our short comings
now -this has to be corrected soon." Ray Johnson
asked those in attendance what direction they would
.�✓ like the board to take. All agreed that they "just
PAGE 2
t
want a park" -but what parcel? A polling of the board
showed the preference to be parcels B & C (outlots H &
J). Don Volk suggested that not a lot of land would
be needed. The board should look to the future with
additional purchases. 7 acres is a good number -access
is important. Marty agreed. He feels it's important
that the neighbors define what is needed. He would
also suggest parcel B as the hills are already there
for sliding etc. Marty also suggested that we consider
the new Centennial Elementary School will be going in
nearby on Birch Street, and that will probably offer
some of the same recreational opportunities and
equipment that the residents are considering, such as
tennis courts, etc. Don pointed out again, the limited
funds, and said that it could be several years before
the land is developed even if the board should
purchase now. The neighbors in attendance suggested
private contributions and the availability of their
time and energy to work with the City. John Baumann
made a motion for City Staff to look into the
possibility of funding for the purchase of parcels B &
C ($60,000.00 is the price suggested by Ron Mikolai).
Candy Toffoli seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously. Mr. Mikolai gave the board members a
list of possible purchase options showing financing
terms to be a Contract for Deed for 2 1/2 years with
20% down.
C. Highland Meadows - This item from new business was
moved uR in the agenda to be presented at this time
because of the preceding lengthy discussion _ Mr.
Jack Menkveld, Developer of Highland Meadows appeared
with a sketch of his proposed development. The
proposed plan is to develop approximately 39 acres
into 86 single family lots. This would include a
minimum park area of 3.9 acres proposed for the
southeast corner of the property, and a trail corridor
to Marpon Acres Development directly to the west. The
park plan concept was accepted by the park board as
presented, and approved unanimously.
D. Recreation Joint Powers Agreement Update - Don Volk
referred to a recent Centerville Council Meeting where
the cities of Circle Pines, Centerville and Lexington
were looking into a plan to form their own joint
recreation agreement in lieu of recent developments
from the Lino Lakes Council. Lino Lakes city staff has
been directed to look into other options also. There
are three considerations at this point, one is to
ratify the current agreement as it is, another is for
Lino Lakes to form their own recreation department and
the third would be to lease out to other cities for
recreational needs, etc. Marty Asleson pointed out
�. that the need for cooperation at this time is very
PAGE 3
important. Ken Johnson, like Marty has been working
with this Joint Powers Plan for the past couple of
years and would like to see Lino Lakes continue with
the plans for the agreement. Don informed the board
that the council considered this item at a meeting
last Saturday, and will continue with the discussion
at a special meeting this Thursday. He pointed out
that the council does recognize the need for
recreation programming.
E. Park Dedication Formula Discussion - Don Volk
explained that John Miller along with the Design
Review Board was concerned about how to handle park
dedication for minor sub divisions, and how certain
formulas affect the concept. He proposed a meeting
with the Design Review Board and Park Board try to
work out an agreeable formula on all types of
developments. Ray Johnson proposed this meeting for
the same night as the next Park Board meeting at
8:00, considering that the next meeting may not be
very long. Staff will contact the DRB to set up this
meeting.
Marty informed the board that the Design Review Board
rejected the Earl Olson property plan. Evidently the DRB
felt that the Park Board, by accepting the plan as
^ presented, set a precedent of park land over lot size.
Therefore, the park dedication plan will be coming back
to the Park Board again.
New Business :
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review - Don Volk asked
for comments from the board concerning the plan. There
were no comments or additions.
Focus Meeting - Don Volk reminded the board of the
upcoming Focus Breakfast Meeting on Saturday Morning
January 12. It appears at this time that all council
members will be in attendance. All park board members
will also be there.
Other New Business - Ray Johnson took this time to
express how he felt about the recent decision by the
council to reduce the size of the park board from
seven to five members. He asked to go on record as
opposing this decision, stating that he feels this
group has always worked well together and has done a
lot of good work, and that he's very disappointed.
He thinks the decision is a mistake. George Lindy
expressed that he feels that all of the board members
would be clad to forego their yearly salaries in order
to maintain the seven member board.
PAGE 4
r"\
No other new business. The meeting adjourned at 10:05 PM.
PAGE 5
/11%k
DATE: January 30, 1991
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson, Supt. of Parks, Recreation and Forestry
RE: New Elementary School Park Concept
During the past month Parks Staff has met with the Landscape
Architect for Centennial School District's new facility off
of Birch Street . We worked up a plan that will be presented
at the next park board meeting. John McClellan, School
Superintendent will be there to present the idea and answer
questions.
Some of the questions that come to mind are that of
development responsibilities, scheduling and maintenance
responsibilities. From my research, there are not many
examples of written agreements to go by, however, there are
plenty of cooperative things being done. The City of New
Brighton, for instance, (and they are not too much different
from most cities) do the scheduling for all of the ballfields
in the City. Thus, there is only one phone call to make for a
reservation. The school districts generally do their own
development, and the city's usually help out with
maintenance, particularly such tasks as lining the ball
fields, dragging, aerifying and fertilizing.
The main point is that we need to use these facilities and
tie them into our developing Parks and Recreation programs.
Please bring your concerns and comments Monday night.
Thank you.
.✓mlk
DATE: January 30, 1991
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson, Supt. of Parks, Rec and Forestry
RE: Lakecrest/Black Duck Park Purchase Options
Enclosed are park land purchase options as you requested.
There has not been any negotiation to this point.
AGEP4D,y
PARK SCENARIOS
Three adjoining parcels of land are currently on the market.
Their location is along the North side of Birch St. just Fast
of Lake Reshanau and just West of Black Duck Drive.
The Park Board may consider one, two or all three of these for
future park land.
Below are expamles of financing for each scenario of purchase.
Each is a Contract for Deed for 2i years with a 20% down payment.
PARCEL A (Orange) Purchase 45,000.
7.46 acres Down Payment 9,000.
Contract for Deed 36,000.
Payment 300.
r,! PARCELS B & C (Green)
10.35 acres
PARCELS A, B & C (Blue)
17.81 acres
PARCELS A & B (Brown)
14.51 acres
Purchase 60,000.
Down Payment 12,000.
Contract for Deed 48,000.
Payment (, — r 400.�'�'��'�
Purchase 105,000.
Down Payment 21,000.
Contract for Deed 84,000.
Payment 700.
Purchase 85,000.
Down Payment 17,000.
Contract for Daed 68,000.
Payment 570.
•--? 1 L•� E D 1?_ s i i h1 E F.'
January 9, 1991
tfarty & Don:
RE: Park Acquisiti n
Birch St near Black Duck Dr
^S Alter`
h'
Following are a couple of financi:,g alternatives in addition
to those proposed Monday
Sale Price $60,000.
Down ?aymient 12,000.
48,000.
ortgage 4 years i0". 4 a,:nual payments o` St5,142.60
inClud.ng principal & interest. No balloon.
B, 5 annual payments $12,0662.28
These are exa:mpies ,J financing s'+b;ect to sellers �rproval.
Let's get tcgether soot and match the alternatives 'r.'it~ the
city's nee-- cn financinc. The .urrent option expires
January 15,":91. S-me direC hcull be `aken on this
tior S: �:
by then.
Y _ Post -It" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 # of psges .
Co. / Co.
Qom'/C r� /
okansoil : ,, IVzacC P� PhoneM
raX" yf6 Fax
onstruction, Inc.
TO: Lino Lakes Park Board
FROM: Kirk Corson, Hokanson Development Inc.
RE: Park Dedication
DATE: February 4, 1991
WWI
We have created the largest park possible above the 100 year flood
level in the townhouse portion of the Wenzel Farms Addition. It
has access to the single family development by two trails and
access throughout the townhouse development and to the regional
park by additional trails. While the Park Board requested at least
a one acre park, we were able to provide over a three acre park.
Al of the park area is high and dry with the exception of a 40, by
40' area adjacent to a culvert. The drainage easement shown within
the park is a requirement of the watershed for future manipulation
of the drainage going to a culvert under Lake Drive even though it
not a wet area.
The park was placed totally within the' townhouse portion of the
development in order to attain preliminary plat approval of the
single family portion of the Wenzel Farms Addition at the January
City Council meeting.. I hope that this attempt at establishing the
tot lot type of play area meets with your approval.
S.ir,r.erely, -
t
Kirk Corson
KC/klu
1
i
j
9174 Isanti St. N-B. • Blaine, MN' $5434 • (612) 786-3130
*************************************************************
*** ATTENTION PARR. BOARD MEMBERS ***
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
DON'T FORGET THAT THE BOARD WILL BE MEETING WITH RANDY AT
6:15 MONDAY NIGHT BEFORE THE PARR BOARD MEETING TO DISCUSS
THE NEW APPOINTMENTS
*************************************************************
*************************************************************
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Parks and Recreation Staff
RE: Recreation Program Position
Enclosed is a draft job description for our Recreation
Programer position. Since we have to advertise for this
position, we should start the process. In light of limited
funds this year, we have some different ideas on how to
proceed with programming, both long term and short term, that
we will be bringing to the park board meeting.
�.
'( �
---- I
Yp"*"�
JOB DESCRIPTION
�16,On
POSITION TITLE - Recreation%upervisor
DEPARTMENT - Park and Recreation
Position Objective:
To provide recreational opportunities for youth, teens and
adults. This is a new position in a newly created Parks and
Recreation Program.
Duties and Responsibilities:
Supervise the work of various activities that are
assigned by the Parks and Recreation C oc-a,,ncL-,+,r
Determine the recreational needs of youth, teens and
adults
Develop and promote the needs of youth, teens and adults
Work closely with Community Education Departments to
,.\ ensure coordinated efforts
Initiate all programs planned and approved
Assist in recruiting, selection, training and evaluating
seasonal staff needed for activities planned
Supervise all programs initiated. Ensure proper training
has occurred and help to ensure safe facility use
Plan and supervise social and league activities for
various youth and adults
Coordinate programs with surrounding communities
Write professional reports, perform other duties as
assigned
Position Requirements:
Knowledge of the philosophy and objectives of organized
recreation
Knowledge of recreation programming relating to youth,
teens and adults
PAGE 1
,r
"'N
RECREATION SUPERVISOR (cont'd.)
Ability to maintain cooperative and harmonious
relationships with employees, organizations and the
public
Ability to speak effectively in public
Strong ability and desire to market recreation in the
community
Ability to conduct meetings
Knowledge of planning, scheduling and executing
recreational programs
Desirable Training and Experience:
Minimum of two years experience in the above responsibilities
Minimum Requirements and Education:
Bachelor's Degree in Recreation and Parks, or Leisure Studies
PAGE 2
ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC.
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 90028
MEMORANDUM NO. 5
DATE February 13, 1991
PROJECT New Elementary School for Centennial ISD No. 12
SUBJECT Meeting at City of Lino Lakes
Regarding Site Plan Review Process and
Shared Construction/Maintenance of Site Amenities
PRESENT 1SD #12
John McClellan
City of Lino Lakes
John Miller
Randy Schumacher o
Don Volk 0✓
Marty Asleson ' CL
y
ATS &R
Andy Matzke C-
BY Andv Matzke
1. Tentative schedule for site plan review as follows:
February 27, 1991: Submit twenty (20) copies of plans to the City of Lino Lakes.
Follow requirements listed in "Developer's Reference Guide" under Site Plan
Review for Commercial and Industrial Buildings.
- March 13, 1991: Design Review Board meeting.
March 25, 1991: City Council meeting.
2. Work with Anoka County Highway Department to coordinate bus drive entrance from
Highway 10, Birch Street.
3. Curbing required for parking lots and drives (B612).
4. Lighting for parking lots not allowed to glare off the site. Submit lighting plan to Police
Chief for security review.
5. Maximize size of eastern softball field.
ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC.
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 90028
MEMORANDUM NO. 5
Page 2
6. Show trail between north and south softball fields (8' width). :adjust trail location to
inside of fence along Birch street and west side of bus drive. Study deleting trail along
southwest property line to Highway 10.
7. Study tree planting north of existing barns because of future residential development of
farm lot.
8. Items to be included in the Construction Documents for the elementary school are:
- Aglime infields, backstops, and safety fences for softball fields.
- Provide suitable grades for soccer fields and trails (coordinate trail location
through wooded areas with Marty Asleson).
- Provide surmountable curbs at future tennis courts.
- Base bid irrigation for lawn areas inside drives around the school (stub lines and
valve wires to fields).
- Separate alternate bids for irrigation for soccer and softball field areas.
9. A joint venture proposal will be prepared by the City and reviewed by the School District
regarding maintenance and use of the playfields. Construction of trails and tennis courts
by the City was also discussed. School District is willing to maintain tennis courts and
provide some funding (up to $5,000 and matched by City) for trail installation.
10. Walk from school site to Hokah Street is a high priority for the District.
11. _ Plans and study for pedestrian crossing under Birch Street were reviewed: Anoka County
approves the plans contingent on providing a bypass during construction and
reconstructing the bituminous pavement to their standards.
12. Sanitary sewer cost estimate has increased by $50,000. Original estimate was $215,000
(to be assessed over 15 years).
AM:bg
cc: John McClellan
Randy Schumacher
John Mille
Don Volk
Marty Asleson
Bill Lawrence
TO: Park Board Members
FROM: Parks Staff
DATE: January 3, 1991
RE: Highland Meadows Park Dedication Proposal
Please find attached a copy of the North Suburban Development
Association, Inc. sketch plan, and a letter from Mr. Jack
Menkveld with a description of their proposal. The park would
help to satisfy open space needs to the west of Lake Drive in
this area.
There is a total of 38.9 acres with 36 lots for a density of
2.2 lots per development acre. Thus the park land dedication
under the present policy is satisfied.
The trail system would follow the existing power pole
easement to the east and west. The suggestion was also made
to Mr. Menkveld that a park trail easement be placed
somewhere in the Lois Lane cul-de-sac to allow for the
anticipated natural path to the park area.
803
13',
UUU.UU -
1021
1922 363 p O 195.00
-
.�....., ..,
1353
"
;17576, Oo
N
79TH
ST.
1
1
1
73:6;
6
�1
2
�G�,
CD
15
w
2�..>~F-
EXCEPTION
�.
-_ -
(I�53•,
- >
e„
Ir;:
- •yf
� i N 89'56'18"E
a
�
__
195.00
I_
1 4
3
3
4
0 4
1503
(1419,'�=
8 23
67
<
13
g
5.
8Cf 1-
o
156 3
13
12 11
10 -
12
216 0';
+ -
,10•+00i
.,.
�v �__
(1,340)
-
!
_
12G.
1-
2 .. ..
t05-
-5 --o
99-OS--
(tO80G)
W
(105J0
t
__ -
•at�ti
;I,;-G " ,
.' IG800 k,CBCC`) (:a6G0) M
9 *
1 0
4 3
1-
14
15 . 16
17 _ 18 19 2 0 -
Q -
-
EC. 8Gx 052
5z- 8c3
90x
80-
-co
n
-
78TH.
LANE
`
O N
m 4
^ N
M
O N
^_
y; O —
, 3
Z
-
-5-
-
1
_
I
-2 --3'_4
A;,2 R03 5,f
1307.49 WE T
1/4 CT .SEA.- -
/Gf��AN6 �C-A�CWS
'"L-'-"~L-
i nuary ell 19�1
NO�lH �U�U�BAN DFVELOPMEWl, }N�.
P. O. Box 34n�4
8laine, Mn. �5434
612-780-6343
City of Lioo Lake*
11Mg Mmin Strnet
Li/.o Lak��, Mn. 55014
(At j,n: Pi4rk Board
U�a, Park 8o,Otrd mwambwors�
We �re p]ann�ng to develope
�pprcxim��ely 3� acres
fo� mir`gle
Yami]y l�t�. Our plao is
to
develop� thc prop�rty
�nto
ximately 86 lot�.
�� The �,opo�ed development
wou1d
�ncluUc a uar�
wppr'.x�mate-jy 4.5 acrt-�s
and
� trail �.orridnr t� the
pr�perLy *e^l
development' A porti�o
nf t!1x� area may 1��
required [or
�torm water rrtentJon.
The 7ropused p�rk nrpa iw in ihe southea*t c�rner of thr
preperty Th� pro�orty �s generally fIat and woll drained apd has
^ th ]i Ther�
/'atn,p tr��� �lonq tha eas� �nd ac�� nps.
" d rk area The prmperty �a�t
tree� io �h� c�nter of the prupose pa .
indu�trik] itind tht-'a praporty sooth o� the per� `�
commercia1 and s�orm water retent�"o ponding area.
this area can be dcvcloPed I j-te 1.,crvin1'�l
d�v�]opm�ot and the a und here �nd a]s� {unctior/ a� a
buifer h�tveen tn� proposeo single iemily h"me� �n6 the exiyt,ny
ind�etrial\commp u�es^
I oi�l bm brioging pnotas �f th� park ar4, no
Sjncnr�*lyr
J., A°`Menkveld, Pres.
6URHAN D�V£L(�PM�N[, lNC.
_
cli
IN oa o0 10 r
660.00 .—
13SY 102t
192i - 161 p O 195.00
�
IJ`.i
(17576, op
79TH
ST.
1
1
6
0
(124F
� 5
\ ra,i
O p
:;c_
167i
6G
---
i (i5,60i
OO
2 r
,,OBGO)
ieyjc
-
�_�
L »ousE�
.� G _.
7 „ G
O
z
1
1 S
w
05u0;
2
e
mr
�,5 e� EXCEPTION
� y
=
(17535)
>
1352
1JSxh�
..
R-6 c o s� N 89'S6'18""E
_
195 .00
(14
4
, a,sc_) 455 1503
'
-� 8 23
�J6x
6C
35i
8Ji
as p'Yf.� (1339('') v (14000)
j�
Z
J
x
9
6yY
•b5
80z _
/ G
1561
I
tilo
_
12 11
10 �;
12
(174J0)
11
5
(1644':\ \ 21 �'
m
5
i=
;
(1134G)
..)(1090C
46;1Q
(t I
/b
LLJ
L
0 0'
t
7 Stt -}-- F,Sx
�
..
I-�BOi-
-'
_ —B03 T
1 _
2G 801
2
�5.
_. f.._ p
B�s
rl __
9 OS 8Ct NOt--(t5516)1O5t
—i�
}_'ems
- L_..
_
!
t t
,'c6^C)
0800 (10800)
(10800)
-_.
41'S
01 -do ('C8
(t Ca J) (10800) (1C000) (14600)
>
6
_
7 8
10
43
14
15 �' 16
17j 18 19 20
— Q
��
ip
r ,
v.
eGf -.
„ 1053
N' ' BOx 8Gt
x
5C
BO= 80t
BOt
BOi
oN�s
4
N
78TH LANE n"
Oi•CBcr
O — i 6
1}5_ _
x 1
es_ eGf
Boi
eon
O
�
r7 O
*
Z
(if.8r.0)f (10800)
(10800)
(10800)�
`
-
BC_ BOS
804
813
i
2�
OAK
LANE n 14 -
-
- ---
-
IT,»,
94t- 1 3
3�
3
"(1,
4 5
Y
6
7 U 12
6G
PARK
5-i0
!(1 if (. its
i1GflCC
(, »PFi
Y 15=
145 H(:.
7 4
44x 1..-.
e0t N`
-- 2045
---
603
158z
7t3
_—
t)
9
1
U"-�f
146f
5
GJ)
6
1
9 10
(12682)
—
1307.49
—
WEST
- -
Ur,F OF ,HE SM14 OF i,1E NE1/4 OF SEG F
A/A (4,V 6 . N(—;r.-4 -D 6, w 5
o,_
19:= 361 o0 95.00—
79TH
ST.
,.z
1
„ .
6 �
S --
-
--
<_��x°
�.
_
Z)� _
LLJ
2
�`.
.ern
5,
,-
n
2
��
E ION
EXCEPTION
195.00
so=
1
3 =
3
4
8 2313
-
9 22
_
-
P ,
T
E7, 2 :E: ,
y
1_
13
12
11
10
1221 /
11.
-
LLJ
(10800)
��
6
8
1
14
15
6
17� -. 18 19 20
Q ;_ -
�I
. 2C- - Ac. t053
"co
7 8 TH LANE �N
oN m 4
� N
"
0
_ N.
_ 2 3 4-
z
O CHNI
_ I
J -
2 0 A K L.AN E j 1
3 � ,—
3 6 12 PARK
2 9
g
S _
6,� 1 9 10 ,
1307.49
?VlG—AILAN 0 N c= A. -DC ws
r ;
1
P� �l
Av
1 t,
,�►'. .fad., _ �• �`.
-4a
-k,
'�I -®•¢ s _ _ � _ '� �� fit'.
son
onstruction, Inc.
December 12, 1990
Attention: Lino Lakes Staff, City Council & interested persons
SUBJECT: Wenzel Farms Addition
Hokanson construction has attempted to create a plat on the Wenzel
Farms property that would meet all the desires of the City of Lino
Lakes and the adjacent property owners.
In so doing we were asked to move the road to the west to give the
adjacent landowners access to their land to allow them to
subdivide. Later, we were told that all the road would be located
on our property even though we receive no benefit and would lose
eight lots in doing so. In addition, because the road is now
located on the property line we are told that we need to sell
additional land to the property owners abutting Elm Street. Also,
we now have the problem of losing trees whereas our original plan
would allow the trees to exist in the rear yards and act as a
buffer for the existing residences to the west. To protect the
trees, we are now supposed to change the grade of the roads where
necessary and show the trees on the survey.
We are told that any development must have curvilinear streets even
though Sunrise Meadows Addition has few curved streets. By using
curvilinear streets our development now has ninety lots versus the
one hundred and two originally shown.
Park land dedication: The state statutes regarding parkland
dedications are explicit. Ten percent is the maximum land area
that can be required in a single family development. Trails that
are dedicated as a park dedication on the final plat must be
included in that ten percent.
In summary, our plat is being reduced from 102 lots to 90 lots, we
are losing land to put in a road which doesn't benefit us and sell
additional land to a neighbor because the road will now be too
close to his house, we are to dedicate trails as parks and not have
them apply as parkland dedication, we are to have curvilinear
streets even though Sunrise Meadows Addition doesn't, and we are to
locate and protect our trees from the adjacent road even though we
would prefer to put the road where it won't affect the trees.
9174 Isanti St. N.E. • Blaine, MN 55434 • (612) 786-3130
The aforementioned obstacles that have recently appeared do not
include problems that will now be encountered because of the
wetland condemnation by the City of Lino Lakes. Prior to the
condemnation, we could have rearranged the wetland within the
allowances of mitigation and received a nationwide permit to allow
some fill. Now we cannot touch it other than for excavation. In
addition, because it has been condemned for easement purposes only,
the taxes must continue to be paid by the existing owners and we
cannot meet the necessary setbacks from it to use the area between
the easement and Lake Drive. This does not include the land we
cannot use on the south side of the easement which we pay for at
the rate of $10,000 an acre - a premium rate given the recession we
are now facing.
Many of the issues noted above were not addressed when
presented our conceptual plat to the City Council.
propose that we submit the preliminary plat as approved
road being relocated in lieu of park dedication (trails
land will still be provided as shown to the Park Board) .
issues which appear to be in a state of confusion wil
resolved by the City Council at the public hearing
direction can then be taken for the final plat. This will
Hokanson Development, Inc.
Kirk Corson
KC/klu
Enclosures: Original concept plan
Plan shown to Park Board
o do
..
80
16 17
so. ev"
B
18
So
19" 20:
bo
21
Do
22-, 23
do 'il a
24 I
do
25^
BO
26=
An
27
Po
28 29 30
a.o
I
I Bo15 BO �x0
=�.rolwo t�
ro.eo,:
12 '
10
9 ��
6 ^
7 g
6
ceoo`
S
eo6
4
ae°c
3 •"�
atatl
2 I _
onoo :+]
ins I �-•--._._
aem m.Aoo^
._ _
roe'
mneo
BNOnT
.o rocI
.. �}SBL-�
A
ao 90
Ao
2 Po
eo
yo
o
eo
90
Y
TH
'JUE 5 IS _
Ak
s 5° C z^F ✓�52�1 L
3E o
>•� te.iso i1 ,ms 4.�5 L _ ac �. Rit/C `\
-
�4
RED,-TEACOURT x 14
�Ea 9
'soI-
_
r12`. o'anoeo • J �`,� v�� �- J�..�] I� I'o l £ PRIVATE107
_ \
^I e0 w de do dC du aG o �O i a° a= +:, 28!2)2829.J0 Ji J2 •JJ,3q I33 �--.� ''�:. w• 5 ,-
.r Se J)f8119�ao �!
I °a5` I a•
n \
'* 0 5 4 3 �i 2 Iro 25 �� 24.,E 23 2�_i 21 9 00 8 7 _ 6 .
Tt--.e ., $er -.neo -I .-,. nu %! -
^ so ae Bo Bn so eo ao � au ,] G
11 6 O agEq
IS_
-- w - do I' dO ao ae ao ao ao ao so 90 Bo c� so\Gy \ 19/
617�1820' 21 IS
2' 23'� 24. 5 26',� 27 ��tnV 8 �i o \9 - f R r }•l•e
ax I :. : I eco I I .g.- •\ '�. xssooa Q:
2 I "! i0 "I 9 8° 7 .I 6: 5 _� 4 3 2 ;�q� 6 4 "
>.- rm, $ .i \. , 8
- s.L
° 1—
..a... ,.aw� _ e��__
ee 8o eB0'o � 8o Bo eo 90 Bo eo Bo I ` y
AR IC C N AIL
W
F-
5 r
is a°o 10� / ���� _ 4
PARK
ro.>eo
li I 14 J3>
ao - sAs 2.6 ACRES
13 It2 Z Z.. +ns
. ---tee
JS 35� 27 '. _
7 .OUTLOT A ,n _.,e N s Zoc
ZONING R- I
1�1 G n17 r- I_ rot P M ,:,
a
4-
ve
100 year HWL 890.02,
RCWD PA. 90—001 IZL-f oll—bie floor el. Wpcem
to pond
a
Rice Lake Court
Rice Lake Lane
son
onstruction, Inc.
December 12, 1990
Attention: Lino Lakes Staff, City Council & interested persons
SUBJECT: Wenzel Farms Addition
Hokanson construction has attempted to create a plat on the Wenzel
Farms property that would meet all the desires of the City of Lino
Lakes and the adjacent property owners.
In so doing we were asked to move the road to the west to give the
adjacent landowners access to their land to allow them to
subdivide. Later, we were told that all the road would be located
on our property even though we receive no benefit and would lose
eight lots in doing so. In addition, because the road is now
located on the property line we are told that we need to sell
additional land to the property owners abutting Elm Street. Also,
we now have the problem of losing trees whereas our original plan
would allow the trees to exist in the rear yards and act as a
buffer for the existing residences to the west. To protect the
trees, we are now supposed to change the grade of the roads where
necessary and show the trees on the survey.
We are told that any development must have curvilinear streets even
though Sunrise Meadows Addition has few curved streets. By using
curvilinear streets our development now has ninety lots versus the
one hundred and two originally shown.
Park land dedication: The state statutes regarding parkland
dedications are explicit. Ten percent is the maximum land area
that can be required in a single family development. Trails that
are dedicated as a park dedication on the final plat must be
included in that ten percent.
In summary, our plat is being reduced from 102 lots to 90 lots, we
are losing land to put in a road which doesn't benefit us and sell
additional land to a ,neighbor because the road will now be too
close to his house, we are to dedicate trails as parks and not have
them apply as parkland dedication, we are to have curvilinear
streets even though Sunrise Meadows Addition doesn't, and we are to
locate and protect our trees from the adjacent road even though we
would prefer to put the road where it won't affect the trees.
9174 Isanti St. N.E. • Blaine,'MN 55434 • (612) 786-3130
The aforementioned obstacles that have recently appeared do not
.�-�.. include problems that will now be encountered because of the
wetland condemnation by the City of Lino Lakes. Prior to the
condemnation, we could have rearranged the wetland within the
allowances of mitigation and received a nationwide permit to allow
some fill. Now we cannot touch it other than for excavation. In
addition, because it has been condemned for easement purposes only,
the taxes must continue to be paid by the existing owners and we
cannot meet the necessary setbacks from it to use the area between
the easement and Lake Drive. This does not include the land we
cannot use on the south side of the easement which we pay for at
the rate of $10,000 an acre - a premium rate given the recession we
are now facing.
Many of the issues noted above were not addressed when we first
presented our conceptual plat to the City Council. We would
propose that we submit the preliminary plat as approved with the
road being relocated in lieu of park dedication (trails and some
land will still be provided as shown to the Park Board). The other
issues which appear to be in a state of confusion will then be
resolved by the City Council at the public hearing and some
direction can then be taken for the final plat. This will expedite
the process. The alternative is to lose another month in
attempting to resolve the newly arising issues prior to appearing
before the City Council in which case the issues will still be
altered in the public hearing process anyway.
Hokanson Development, Inc.
Kirk Corson
KC/klu
Enclosures: Original concept plan
Plan shown to Park Board
f
P
N'4
q_N.
._— 502o9.Ej S
rH -
VUE G.
a
3 � 2
�� ♦i 15 3 ``-S3
gN I .le. IG.aW 4
•� I Ipa ]A VRONT SBL TO rq0 35
'TO ] ��� �IH \
SBi ST SB39iH
:ae°casr¢I,N RED2TEAL :OURI,x 14 _ � Aq,�` H' e K 5��4g
DRIVE -�.. ,tq`v
t0
12 '.v�.n. ap !'HI1're i19 �20� \�
REAR sHL / '^- PRIVATE
do No 60 -': So do dJ I >e :J \ , , -rt .] / 26 212BI28,30 1 31132.33 36 33 i �
3H 31 ]B 138140
_— \\
--- o ,9°0' 080' 6: 5 4 T �I 25 n 24 23
3 2 I n2ao u,9o0 io aoe .o,9oc ,o aoo I a2°O ..M deo ,a.eao ,a 1o0 / 'O Q qf4
° HO eo Bo Ho ao Ho do eo 90 ao �° as 20 L ` \° `�-
<u ruee vuzE 1 I % � t= zaso y�---�' -- ��--_. tam -• 4 �• � \ ��
do do 80 ° 80 a 90 Ho 80. 80 80 6J Se V' n i9.°°
20' 21 22 4 25 26 27y
�18123 'i 2d :esm�o 2 _1
17
\0
\�.1
F74oao N\_•62344a 12 . N \8
— FRONTi90
Ho ..
_.
9 5 ly
--� -4RM° ARTIc C AN__
_ q 1 -'1166 dC 80 80 Bo 80 80 HO 8.15
F- 16 17 08 m _ I 1 15s ns � SLsoo
9" 20A 21 A 22, 23M 24, 25^ 26M 27� 28TI 29_I 30 I I I ro.s°o S/°o soo PARK
U) 144ea Meoo � meet` ,o,ero" ;o,eeo �e a.-o ''p" roaoo" .o.ao° ,ue°o .o eoo zo.--I Jo, cool
_� 8o BC eo do eo ao Ho eo ao 8o eo eo lao I 14 - 4.l— '04 33eso- '� 2.6 ACRES
R 7° 6 :. 5 T 4� 03 " 2 s I .so e: S N i sHs _
I9°o 18 12 I I _ 10 A 9 8 _ T O 2 z
M.em io,eooA ro.Boo' M.aco� :o,eooia.eoc ro. eoo .o aoo .e.eoo ..eoo io. eauG,L.AJ 13 -as
T ^
ro °
n.doo J
� B° 8o go 8o A eo Bo 8o e0 NO 8a e0 Bo ILo b0 .SC, ^o j Np 1
4.:^•NsLN +y4 i] fF 2°EO fR"-roao -GVNE
HS 3 ee---�Y�
.,. 1 1 ,'.OUTLOT Q a - -.M1en�s- �G D .. �c ✓51 NO ;✓OE 2 3 81 n .1..E x e i✓ .r_F_��N a.✓�F
4{ o n n
„1a5 -f E4 5 .. ffSn1
j , lsnrEa ..a •• . nC5 rgrSON .vaRLEJ_/�rgl tu=-✓'-EufR n ; �
ZONING R- I
I,
i
`I
i4k
.o•Drive �J
4.9
N4p�.
sawj
I
Sv h w, I � w � _ ��� ��\�S �'� /✓"�._"._s—._' Oranoge �asement�� J�
t
100 year HWL 890.02
Per RCWD PA. 90-C-
Loaat allom a ncor el. adjacent
'sill`�, i ,,,to
to Pond 892.02 !
- Y
'may, -- vo •- '
a-:
».
- -
v
• � �I I
Rice Lake Court
Rice Lake Lane
a
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson, Supt. Parks, Rec and Forestry
DATE: January 3, 1991
RE: Wenzel Farms Development
Enclosed is a revised copy of the Wenzel Property Park
Dedication concept and a letter from Hokanson Construction,
Inc. describing their concerns.
As one can see, the proposed playground (defined as about 1
acre) was moved to the southwest corner of the development.
This still fulfills our needs as was discussed at the last
park board meeting.
Kirk Corson from Hokanson Development will be at the meeting
to answer your questions.
Thank you
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
WENZEL FARMS TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION
In compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 317, the undersigned, all
of whom are residents of Minnesota and all of whom are of legal age, have this day voluntarily
associated themselves together for the purpose of forming a corporation not for profit and do
hereby certify:
ARTICLE 1
The name of the corporation is the Wenzel Farms -Association, hereafter called the
"Association".
ARTICLE 2
The principal office of the Association is located at 9174 Isand Street NE., Blaine, Minnesota,
55434.
ARTICLE 3
Roger A. Hokanson, whose work address is 9174 Isanti Street NE., Blaine, Minnesota, 55434,
is hereby appointed the initial registered agent of this Association.
The incorporators of this Association and their addresses are as follows:
Roger A. Hokanson - 15570 Potawatami
Andover, Minnesota 55434
Vivian Hokanson - 15570 Potawatami
Andover, Minnesota 55434
ARTICLE 4
PURPOSE AND POWER OF THE ASSOCIATION
The Association does not contemplate pecuniary gain or profit to the members thereof, and the
specific purposes for which it is formed are to provide for maintenance, preservation and
architectural control of the residence lots and common area within that certain tract of property
described as:
1
ARTICLE 5
MEMBERSHIP
'�. Every person or entity who is a record owner or contract for deed vendee of a fee or undivided
fee interest in any Lot which is subject by covenants of record to assessments by the
Association, including contract sellers, shall be a member of the Association. The foregoing is
not intended to include persons or entities who hold an interest merely as security for the
performance of an obligation. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated
from ownership of any Lot which is subject to assessment by the Association.
ARTICLE 6
VOTING RIGHTS
Section 1. Classes of Membership. This Association shall have two classes of voting
membership:
Class A - Class A members shall be all Owners, with the exception of Declarant, and shall be
entitled to one vote for each Lot owned. When more than one person holds an interest in any
Lot, all such persons shall be members. The vote for such shall be exercised as they, among
themselves, determine, but in no event shall more than one vote be cost with respect to any Lot.
Class B. - Class B members shall be the Declarant and shall be entitled to three (3) votes for
each lot owned. The Class B membership shall cease and be converted to Class A membership
on the happening of either of the following events, whichever occurs earlier.
a. when the total votes outstanding in the Class A membership is equal to the total votes
outstanding in the Class B membership.
or
b. on December 31, 1996
Section 2. Cumulative Voting. Cumulative voting shall not be allowed. Voting rights may be
suspended as set forth in the By -Laws and the Declaration of Covenants.
ARTICLE 7
LIABILITY AND CAPITAL STOCK
The extent of personal liability of the members for corporate obligations and the methods and
enforcement of collection are none. The Association shall have no capital stock.
ARTICLE 8
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The affairs of this Association shall be managed by a Board of three directors, who need not be
members of the Association. The number of directors may be changed by amendment of the By -
Laws of the Association. The names and addresses of the persons who are to act in the capacity
of directors until the selection of their successors are:
3
NAME
Roger A. Hokanson
Vivian M. Hokanson
ADDRESS
15570 Potawatami
Andover, Minnesota 55434
15570 Potawatami Street
Andover, Minnesota 55434
At the first annual meeting the members shall elect three directors who shall serve until the next
annual meeting or until their successors shall be elected and qualified.
Any action, other than an action requiring membership approval, may be taken by written action
signed by the number of directors that would be required to take the same action at a meeting
of the board at which all directors were present, provided that all directors must be notified of
the text of the written action prior to the signing by any of the directors.
ARTICLE 9
DISSOLUTION
The Association may be dissolved with the assent given in writing signed by not less than two
thirds (2/3) of each class of _members. Upon dissolution of the Association, other than incident
to a merger or consolidation, the assets of the Association shall be dedicated to an appropriate
public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created.
In the event that such dedication is refused acceptance, such assets shall be granted, conveyed,
and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association, trust or other organization to be devoted
to such similar purposes.
ARTICLE 10
DURATION
The corporation shall exist perpetually.
ARTICLE 11
AMENDMENTS
Amendments of these Articles shall require the assent of seventy five percent (75 %) of the entire
membership.
IN THE WITNESS WHEREOF, for the purpose of forming this corporation under the laws of
the State of Minnesota, we the undersigned, constituting the incorporators of this Association,
have executed the incorporation of this Association, have executed these Articles of
Incorporation this day of 1991.
4
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
AND RESTRICTIONS
This Declaration, made this day of , 1991 by Hokanson Development, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Declarants").
Witnesseth:
Whereas, the Declarants are the purchasers of the following described property located in the
City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, State of Minnesota.
Whereas, the Declarants intend to develop the aforementioned area into single family lots and
townhome lots in accordance with the ordinances and zoning classifications applicable to this
area.
NOW THEREFORE, the Declarant hereby declare that the real property described as the
Wenzel Farms Plat, shall be owned, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to
the covenants, restrictions and liens hereinafter set forth, which covenants, restrictions and liens
shall run with the real property, and be binding on all parties having any rights, title or interest
in the Plat or any part thereof, and their heirs, successors, representatives and assigns.
ARTICLE 1
The following words shall have the following meaning unless the context shall otherwise require:
1. LENDING INSTITUTION shall mean any person, partnership, corporation, or entity who
is a mortgagee, holder of a mortgage, or a contract vendor on a lot in the Plat, or a person,
partnership, corporation, or entity who is about to become a mortgagee, holder of a mortgage,
or a contract vendor upon the sale of any lot in the Plat.
2. LOT shall mean and refer to any lot contained in any block shown upon the recorded Plat.
3. OWNER shall mean the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of the fee
simple title to any lot contained in the Plat, and subject to this Declaration, but shall not mean
or refer to any lending institution unless and until such lending institution has acquired title
pursuant to foreclosure and the period in which the fee owner may redeem from such foreclosure
has terminated, or until such lending institution has acquired title by deed in lieu of foreclosure.
4. SALE shall mean any transfer, conveyance, or contract to convey any lot, whether for
consideration or not, and whether the transfer, conveyance or contract to convey is placed of
record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles or not.
SAMPLE DRAFT
1
14. Declarant reserves the right to modify any requirements regarding amenities such as
00*% mailbox designs, signage, trash receptacles, etc.
15. Standards regarding architectural design shall be made by the Declarant so long as it does
not diminish the quality of the development and is applied consistently through the Association.
16. Trail access easements across Association property shall not be amended.
ARTICLE 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Invalidation of any one of these covenants and restrictions by judgement or Court order shall
in no way affect the validity of any other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect.
2. The covenants, conditions and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the Plat
for a period of six years from the date this Declaration is recorded, or until the Class A and
Class B memberships are equivalent.
3. Any notice required to be sent to the City of Lino Lakes or a lending institution under this
Declaration, shall be deemed to have been properly notified when mailed, postage prepaid, to
the last known address of the City or lending institution.
r-"N IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, have executed this
instrument as of the day and year first above written.
,-1*N
SAMPLE DRAFT
3
B
10)
17
/3 IS
A .- 1� �'. .LZ kp.'1/.
LEI
/yk
16
�tia ;°' p >�> 20 a' o '+ l _ }�•.. 3 rr 2 -a. )p �
(4cz.
ul /B
�> �i✓)
/9 (17) i Tiu li
•V' 0 3 t, g?S w�. F• B 'S /l°i° r� �P� 6tiA1 ����
20y) ' Ct s
w C
�
,aa ' , 22-r9)P • -,t.n i�/2B) / 4J- / j ..W
KW
24a
�xf. '•r) Lr poi /zz)sy" � 'ems ::. s . H s � � .°, a - } !
LANTERN4 - 4-ANE77,
�
~ 4 n 5
fj t o34) r+�/cLSAD®. Nb 6 s )
a ..! e ! 5 4 r i 2/i�!a)� TAIW°S PL'ACE ,
ry a
htf�—c� %/ P 8 .
f.n n �o „
`' Sll !(71) (7f) (43� r ra%ri. E° r✓ `'J � l� 1x�,j'
1 I /,3 /2 0 9- B�a 5� 4UO) . f`s'
SHQNAU
i, /4 ��) i °sas rrJ
.y i k. +
l� _
t
a
/5
/O $)9 t t .ccv 28'
!4i° v i ti d� .� z
a5,..:<,a LL
qs' c a'4d7�) 1,199k 'a'8.. e., 106iw)s.a?s)30 a /
Ice
,, qe (B�) r�C' 2(18) i ' �3) I + r /.:✓ a' �' .. z .
74 •. p4 i /B Gvi 1/.za) Q.
} t ?44 °° � ti Eo' ✓� C/-; _C.,, ;/ �g ,�' I.�2 � ,jd)3/
W , :
�,t
(w) 20 r . 32
R/GHT•OF•
STATE - -- _ .4K)"
°
AID HIGHWAY:• PLAT Q
------------- ------ ---
A.
10
CENTER-
i SEC. 28
n56
�(6 ow
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Parks and Recreation Staff
DATE: January 3, 1991
RE: New Park Dedication Formula
Enclosed is a memorandum from John Miller, City Planner to
the Design Review Board concerning the amending of the Park
Dedication requirement.
The idea for establishing a standard formula for development
in Lino Lakes seems to fall apart when looked at from a Minor
Subdivision standpoint (i.e.) sub standard parcels made from
park land dedication, and the minimum/maximum dedication
dollars based on raw land value.
I have been directed to ask to set a joint meeting for the
Park Board and Design Review Board. This meeting should be
held on a weekday or evening. Please bring several dates to
the next meeting that you would be available for such a
meeting.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lino Lakes Design Review Board
FROM: John Miller, City Planner
DATE: December 3, 1990
SUBJECT: Amending Park Dedication Requirements
Background: The Lino Lakes Park Board is responsible for negotiating with land
developers for both land and park facilities.
In either late 1987 or early 1988 the park fee for residential lots was increased from
about $150 to $400 per lot. Since that time land values have increased in the city
and the board members are looking at increasing the cash dedication.
Why does the park board want to do this? In their negotiations with the developers,
the members have noted that most of them were more interested in paying the $400
than in giving a land dedication. Obviously the cash was a better deal for the
developers when actually there should be little financial difference between the two
options of land or cash.
In any attempt, to rectify this situation the board and the city staff assigned to them
have proposed the following:
A. Each lot in a minor subdivision would have the fee increased from $400
to $ 500.
B. For other subdivisions this formula would apply:
(Land cost) (.10) (Total Acreage) = Dollars/lot
Number of Lots
The land cost is defined as a minimum of $10,000 an acre.
Professional Opinion: So what does the formula produce in way of park fees? Let's
look at some examples: Applied to D. Erickson's Willow Ponds this is the result:
(10,000) (.10) (13) = $481.
27
50
Well that shows a modest increase. Let's look at Sunrise Meadows. Even though its
already developed it should be a good test for the formula.
00IN /1" 30*'
(10,000) (.10) (42) _ $407.
103
Hmmm. Some improvement over the current $400. but not too much. Let's try
Woodridge Estates.
(10,000) (.10) (38) _ $542.
70
OK. Now the pattern emerges. Development with lower densities pay higher rates
with the formula. Here all the R-1X developments will pay more if the park board asks
for cash. Subdivisions in R-1 areas will pay lesser amounts.
Now there are two ways of looking at this. First it can be argued that the bigger lots
are more valuable and a higher dedication is fair. And it can also be argued that large
lots cover a greater land area so they should pay more; you know, closer to the ten
per cent rule.
The other way of arguing this is that residential areas with greater densities need more
park facilities because each lot is smaller. Hence, the cash dedication should be
greater. There are after all more people to serve in an R-1 area vis-a-vis an R-1X
11-1s, district.
Let's go back to some analysis. Using the draft formula a residential development
with a density of 25 homes per acre (about average) would pay $400. per lot -
exactly what the current rate is. With the draft formula any density greater than 25
homes per acre actually would pay less than the current amount. For example three
lots per acre would provide a fee of only $333. each. A development with two
homes per acre would pay $500. for each lot.
Here's my recommendation. Recommend approval of the formula but just as there
is a minimum land value there should be a minimum park fee. The city should
increase that fee to $450. per lot. If the formula produces a greater amount then fine.
But if not the developer would pay the $450. fee.
Recommended Action: Motion to recommend to the city council adoption of an
ordinance amendment setting the park fee for minor subdivision at $500. and
establishing a formula for determining other park fees but with the addition of a $450.
minimum fee for each lot in a major subdivision.
PARK BOARD MEETING
September 5, 1990
i"N There has been discussion at previous park board meetings to
investigate the possibilities of changing the cash park
dedication. The cash park dedication now stands at $400.00
per lot.
Laura Elken surveyed several communities and it appears that*
we are not to far off - if we consider the cost of "raw
land". "Raw land" can be purchased now for between $6,000 to
$10,000 per acre - fair market land value.. Some time ago
Marty and Don met to -determine a fair method to be followed.
The method they came up with is as follows:
Land Cost/Acre X 10% of Subdivided Acreage - Park
($10, 000/acre minimum) (C�,�., �, �_') Dedication/
Lot
EXAMPLE: Willow Ponds S } ter
27 Lots, 13 acres, - Land Cost is $10,000/acre.
$10,000 X 1.3 Acres (10%)
27 Lots = $481.48/Lot
This is using the 0 - 3 units/acre/l0% category of our
dedication policy. That is the figure that we would need per
lot to acquire comparable land to be used for parks.
The park board discussed this formula and discussed what
would happen if someone purchased the land 10 years ago at a
much cheaper price. There will have to be a base figure
used. With todays rate that base figure will probably stand
at $10,000 per acre of raw land.
The board also discussed what park dedication would be if it
were a minor subdivision of. Incorporated in the park
dedication formula will be a cost per lot amount. Based on
$10,000 per acre that cost per lot would be $481.48/lot.
Next month the park board will receive a draft park
dedication ordinance.
MOTION: Ken Johnson moved to direct staff to draft a park
dedication ordinance change based on the formula that was
presented to the park board. Candy Toffoli seconded the
motion and the motion was approved unanimously.
BRANDYWOOD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
The city council has approved the Brandywood Development.
Construction of the development is scheduled to start the
summer of 1991.
As a result of council approval, the park land previously
r Page 3
n
,1-N
,•*%,
CHANGE PARAGRAPH 3 TO READ:
Paragraph 3. For residential, commercial, and industrial
development the following land dedication will apply:
Density in Units/Acre
0
to
3
3
to
5
5
to
7
7
to
9
10 or
more
Percentage of Land Dedication
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Land site selection is to be approved by the park board.
The city may choose to accept an ecjuivalent amount in cash
from applicant based on the following formula:
Land Cost/Acre
(510-,000/minimum acre) X (Density Factor % x Subd. acreage)
Number of tots in Subdivision
Park Dedication/Lot
Paragraph 4. The park board may accept any combination of
land and mon, not to exceed the dedication requirements.
Paagraph 5.: Minor subdivisions, as defined by ordinance,
will be required to follow the Land Dedication Density Table
listed in the ordinance, or $500.00 per building site, at the
decision of the park board.
T
TO: All Park Board Members
FROM: Marty Asleson, Supt. Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: January 3, 1991
RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
Please find enclosed a copy of the proposed 1990 Comprehen-
sive Plan Land Use Amendment. John Miller's Executive Summary
section explains the process and the reasoning.
Please bring any comments you might have on this document to
the Park Board Meeting next Monday.
Thank you
1990 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Land Use Element
CITY OF LINO LAKES
October 1990
DRAFT
A,".
)O-N
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Minnesota legislature has given municipalities the
authority to plan for many years. Currently that legislation
is found in section 462.353 of the state statutes. There
plan preparation, adoption, and amendment are all discussed.
In the early - 1970's the legislature recognized that the
size and extent of the Minneapolis - St. Paul Urban area was
so great that special planning requirements were needed as a
result, the Metropolitan Council was created. This
legislation is found in sections 473.123 of the statutes.
Lino Lakes first comprehensive plan was started in 1973.
Titled Development Policies and Comprehensive Guide Plan, the
document was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and found
to be consistent with that agency's region -wide plan on
January 24, 1974.
One of the responsibilities assigned to the Metropolitan
Council is to review Municipal plans. Section 473.175 of the
statutes requires the council to prepare a metropolitan
development guide providing policies and goals for the
development of infrastructure items. Local plans are to be
consistent with the development guide and sections 473.175
and 473.858 give the Metropolitan Council authority to review
local plans for that consistency.
In simple, easy -to -understand terms these legal requirements
mean that Lino Lakes is not an island into itself. It is
part of a larger metropolitan region and as a result certain
goals established for that larger area must be part of the
local plan. This is especially true for infrastructure items
including sanitary sewer, water drainage and retention
devices, and roads.
This 1990 comprehensive plan amendment attempts to meet the
requirements of state law, to incorporate the plans and
policies of regional operating agencies into the city's plan,
and to provide locally determined goals and policies for the
city's decision -makers in resolving land planning issues.
Process
This comprehensive plan amendment is not the result of an
orderly, structured attempt to revise the city's 1987 plan.
There was no subcommittee, there wasn't a cadre of planning
and engineering professionals, and there wasn't a determined
effort to produce a comprehensive plan revision. This plan
amendment is the result of changed circumstances and the
city's reaction to them over the last four years.
Page 1
ko
The 1987 plan was prepared under different conditions.
Residential development, for example had historically been
stable with only a slight increase. In addition there was no
serious consideration of large scale commercial and
industrial development. In fact the main issue of the 1987
plan was matching residential development in rural areas with
proper rural development standards.
There is some irony in that the copier fluid was hardly
bonded to the paper before outside circumstances changed Lino
Lakes once and forever. In particular 1987 was the year of
the Metropolitan area physically armied in Lino Lakes.
Beginning in August of that year, large numbers of land
developers and residential builders began making visits to
Lino Lakes' City Hall. Inquiries were made regarding land
and sewer availability. Questions of zoning, sewer costs,
and land ownership were fielded by the city's staff. And,
there was enough interest from the builders and developers to
invalue the building official, administration, clerk,
planner, and consulting engineer. There had never been
anything like it before and this interest in the city
continues today.
By December of 1987 it became clear to the city's elected and
1114� appointed officials that the 1987 plan did not provide the
guide necessary for the city's development. The "old" plan
addressed many issues that had become irrelevant and did not
touch on other options that suddenly have community issues.
The men and women serving the city on its council, planning
and zoning board, economic development commission, and park
board were forced to confront issues without the benefit and
luxury of study committees, task forces, and ad hoc
committees for the study of whatever. In light of the city's
changed conditions these people acted quickly and prudently,
addressed the issues as they came and changed the city's
policies and ordinances to meet community goals.
Among the issues dealt with were:
1. Establishing closer relationships between the
council and the advisory boards. This started in
January of 1988 with day -long joint meetings and a
bus -tour of Lino Lakes and adjacent communities.
2. Creation of the executive housing districts.
Completed in the winter of 1988 this action amended
the city's zoning map to reserve several high -
amenity areas for construction of custom-built
homes.
3. Protection of residential property values was also
addressed early in 1988 as minimum housing
Page 2
6
/""a
standards were increased to assure new residents
their investments in the city were safe.
4. Revision of the city's park dedication standards in
1988 was done to provide the land and money
necessary to provide the city's new residents with
open space they would need for both active and
passive recreation.
5. Providing citizen input in the planning process was
also an issue. In the spring of 1988 the park
board and city council jointly commissioned a
citizen survey asking city residents what they
wanted for the city's future. The major results
were: 1) development of a trail system, 2)
commercial and industrial development to lower
property taxes, 3) preservation of the city's
natural environment, and 4) a sprucing -up of Lino
Lakes and especially the entrances to the city.
6. In the summer of 1988 trail development in new
residential areas was made mandatory by action of
the park board and city council.
7. Earlier in 1988 the economic development committee
began examining the city's supply of commercial and
industrial land. The members found this issue had
been neglected by the 1987 plan and they made
recommendations for rezoning of residential areas
located near both the I-35W and Lake Drive and the
I-35E and County Road 14 interchanges. The city
council started implementation of this work in late
1988 with the creation of more industrial and
commercial land.
8. Metropolitan Urban Service Area configuration and
size was addressed in the spring of 1989. The
city's engineering consultant and the city planner
along with some city council members began a series
of neighborhood meetings. The primary topic of
these informal sessions was the extension of
sanitary sewer. Through the meetings, however, a
wide -range of development issues was discussed.
Based on these meetings the city council was able
to change the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
boundary in 1989 with almost no citizen opposition.
The boundary changes greatly altered the MUSA shown
in the 1987 plan as several landowners within the
boundary wanted out and others located outside the
boundary wanted to be included. This revised
boundary as well as a redrafted sewer plan were
submitted to the Metropolitan Council in late 1989.
9. Implementation of the city's revised goals, plans,
Page 3
and ordinances (actually an implementation tool
themselves) was started with the establishment of
Builder's Day in 1988 and continued on an annual
basis to the present. This informal meeting allows
developers and city representatives to discuss new
rules and regulations affecting construction in
Lino Lakes. Implementation has also been started
with promotional material prepared by the economic
development committee, some of it particularly
blunt in its description of the type of development
the city will accept.
This comprehensive plan amendment is the result of the nine
actions just listed and other minor decisions of the city
council, its advisory boards, and its citizens. The text is
an effort to codify the work of the last four years and to
give body to what has evolved as a de facto plan, i.e. here
is a single document that provides the guidelines for
community development in Lino Lakes.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
The following major changes are made in the 1990
comprehensive plan amendment.
1. The "Rural Expansion" land use is eliminated.
Areas outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area are considered rural with either a ten or
twenty acre minimum lot size. All areas within the
MUSA boundary are considered urban and development
is permitted only with full urban services. The 2
1/2 acre rural lot development opportunities are
eliminated.
2. Criteria for the establishment of executive housing
areas are established.
3. Policies are established limiting the extension of
utilities, residential lot inventories, and
requiring phasing of residential subdivisions.
4. Land needs for commercial and industrial uses are
established and sites for this development are
identified.
5. The need for a collector street connecting C.R. 14
and Birch Street is identified.
6. The sewer policy plan is revised showing a revised
MUSA boundary. The new boundary reflects
intentions of landowners regarding development of
their property. Additional detail is provided for
each of the six sewer service areas.
Page 4
INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
Lino Lakes is a municipality incorporated in 1955 from the
former Centerville Township. Covering an area of
approximately 33.5 square miles, the city occupies the very
southeast corner of Anoka'County.
Landforms: There are two significant features in the Lino
Lakes' landscape. First, as part of the Anoka Sand Plain (a
glacial outwash plan formed by the--retreating-Keewatin'
glacier) the topography is flat. Lying approximately 900
feet above sea level, the city has no area marked with hills
or rapidly changing elevations. The greatest change in
elevation probably is adjacent to the drained Cedar Lake.
Here adjacent to the former shore, elevations changes of
nearly 25 feet are found. A similar area is found on the
north shore of Reshanau Lake but for all practical purposes
the city is "flat as a pancake."
The second significant topographical feature in Lino Lakes is
the extensive lake and wetland area. The city has 2,863
acres of wetlands and 3105 acres of lakes, giving a total of
almost six square miles of water.
In terms of aesthetics its a good thing the water is in the
city. Without the wetlands and the resulting wooded
shorelands the city would look like the drier part of
Sherburne County - no amenities what -so -ever.
These amenities have not gone unnoticed. Anoka County
condemned 2621 acres of land for a passive regional park in
the early 19601s. In addition home buyers looking for high -
amenity settings have located adjacent to Reshanau Lake and
in the southeast corner of the city between Bald Eagle Lake
and Otter Lake.
On the negative side the wetlands make the extension of
utilities and roadways difficult and expensive. In time
maintenance cost will also be higher than the norm because of
water problems, in particular the water will cause inflow and
infiltration of water into the sewer system and break-up of
asphalt roads.
Vegetation: Historically the shallow lake beds have provided
a smorgasbord of food for native Americans and for a large
animal population. While there has been a considerable
amount of sedimentation of the lake beds since European
settlement, the local wildlife population remains high -
aimost to the nuisance level in the case of deer.
Away from the wet soils extensive stands of oak can be found
especially red oak. Unfortunately oak wilt currently
threatens these stands. Ironically the sandy soils on which
the oaks thrive are of limited value for agriculture. This
Page 5
fact probably saved some of the large oak stands and adds to
the current perception of Lino Lakes as a high amenity area.
Stands of willow, aspen, and birch are found adjacent to the
wetlands on the higher organic content soils. In more recent
times plantings of Norway pine have been made by recent and
current residents, adding some winter color. The city's
densely settled areas have evolved into the usual "urban
forest" with plantings as diverse as Black. -Hills spruce,
Kentucky coffee trees, and mock orange.
Transportation: For all practical purposes city residents
are entirely dependent on auto and truck transportation.
However, located in the northwest corner of the city is the
Lino Air Park. This unique development has single-family
homes adjacent to a sod landing -strip. Presently the
development is not completed and several lots remain to be
developed. In addition a seaplane base is located on the
west shore of Rice Lake.
It should also be added that Metropolitan Transit Commission
bus service has been extended to the city. Service is
available to the correctional facility located just north of
I-35W and west of Lake Drive. Service to commuter lots is
also provided. For the most part though buses are not used
and the service provided is more for political reasons than
rider demand.
Now to the cars and trucks. Lino Lakes has the enviable
position of being served by two freeways. Interstate 35W
provides direct access to Minneapolis and I-35E gives access
to St. Paul and suburbs. Travel times to both downtown areas.
is about 15-18 minutes.
In the recently completed citizens' survey this quick access
to other parts of the seven county metropolitan area was
identified by Lino Lakes residents as one of the benefits of
living in the city. Access ranked second behind only
aesthetic appearance.
one weakness of the interstate system though is the lack of a
connection between the two freeways, i.e. there's no way to
get from I-35W to I-35E south of Forest Lake save the round-
about C.R. 14 through Centerville. Other freeway needs
include the need for diamond exchanges at 80th Street and I-
35E and at Main Street and I-35W. The latter would provide
direct access to the 2700 acre regional park. The former
would be the start of the northern link and would provide
access to the northeast corner of the city.
Development: While most other cities in the Metropolitan
Area have experienced very cyclical residential growth, and
most recently have experienced a downtown, Lino Lakes has a
history of steadily increasing residential development.
Page 6
,.y
Housing Starts 1980 - 1989
Year Building Permits
1980
109
1981
79
1982
61
1983
104
1984
95
1985
117
1986
147
1987
152
1988
168
1989
193
Population growth has a course been a reflection of this
development.
Lino Lakes Population
1980 - 1989
Year Population
1980
6030
1985
6563
1986
6977
1987
7452
1988
7925
1989
8498
By 1989 interest in subdividing land for residential uses had
reached boom proportions. At one time 18 developers were
considering subdivisions for different parcels of land with
combined area of almost 600 acres.
Obviously development this rapid could lead to financial
problems for Lino Lakes (and the developers) if there were a
serious financial down turn. Development policies regarding
accessibility to sewer, lot inventory, and market value of
housing is needed.
Commercial and industrial development has been much slower in
coming to Lino Lakes. Building permits issued for this use
over the past four years has primarily been a reflection of
local businesses expanding, e.g. A -Well, and Arndt
Construction.
More recently proposals for larger scale development have
been received that would place retail developments at I-35W
and Lake Drive and T.H. 49 and Lake Drive. A 21,000 square
foot strip mall has been approved as a redevelopment project
at the corner of Lake Drive and Main Street. Still though
Page 7
r'r,
little commercial or industrial construction has been
completed in the city.
Results of this lack of activity include:
1. Limited local shopping opportunity.
2. Poor opportunity for local employment especially
for high school students.
3. Low tax base with residential property bearing the
local tax burden.
Population Projections: Lino Lakes needs to continue its
policy of controlled growth. In looking at single-family
construction a limit of 200 new sewered lots annually will
provide the following population totals:
Year
Projected City Population
1990 - 2010
Households
Population/HR Population
1990
2793
3.26
9105
1995
3843
3.17
12182
2000
4893
3.07
15022
*,
2005
5943
2.97
17651
2010
6993
2.87
20070
There is a considerable amount of feeling in Lino Lakes that
with more sewer availability and capacity the 200 single-
family dwellings projected each year could easily be
exceeded. The city should carefully monitor its lot
inventories and be in a position to either increase the total
number of lots available or to take steps to limit further
the number of additional lots going through the subdivision
process.
Multiple -Family Housing Opportunities: Lino Lakes contracted
with Maxfield Research Associates to complete a housing
analysis early in 1989. The Maxfield people projected a
market of 150 to 200 units of multifamily could be supported
during the 19901s. They saw need for a project of moderate
size (30 to 40 miles) to meet demand for rental units.
In addition a definite need for townhomes was seen by
Maxfield. The townhomes could be utilized by singles,
couples, and retired persons. Recommended by Maxfield was a
46 to 60 unit project with contemporary one and two-story
units, probably in the $60,000 to 190,000 price range. Sites
near the city's freeways were recommended as best for this
housing.
Manufactured and Mobile Homes: Presently state law prohibits
Page 8
h
discrimination against manufactured housing. There is
manufactured housing in Lino Lakes and these dwellings are
found in Rice Lake Estates and in Shenandoah 3rd Addition.
In both instances the manufactured housing has the appearance
of traditional stick -built houses. The total number of these
dwellings is less than 100.
Lino Lakes has a specific zoning district for manufactured
housing. The district has been removed however from the
draft zoning ordinance by the city's planning. agency and
final city council action is pending at this time. The
zoning district was used once with poor results and the
owner -developer asked for a rezoning to a planned unit
development district. The city's experience shows the best
course of action is to integrate manufactured and stick -built
housing provided all minimum standards are met.
There is one mobile home park in Lino Lakes. It is located
on the T.H. 49 in the very southwest corner of the city and
has approximately 70 lots. Most of Lino Lakes is served by
the Centennial School District. The number of mobile homes
in that district (including Circle Pines, Lexington, and part
of Blaine) approaches a total of 1500. The school district
quite simply needs more tax base and fewer students. The tax
levy of the school has reached the point where brokers are
finding difficulty in selling real estate within district
boundaries. If there were even a place where "tax base
planning" was beneficial it's in the Centennial School
District. Because of this tax situation expansion of mobile
home parks (and other land uses returning relatively small
amounts of property tax dollars) should not be permitted.
Property Taxes: For the 20 year period covered by the 1960's
and 1970's there were a lot of bad things said about tax base
planning. There is probably even some case law where zoning
decisions of local governments were overturned because the
actions were "exclusionary" or based simply on permitting
whatever land use returned the most in property taxes and
disregarding other property rights.
Presently the Minneapolis Citizens League has determined that
owners of an average 180,000 dwelling in Lino Lakes would pay
the ninth highest property taxes of all the cities and
townships they surveyed in the seven county metropolitan
area.
There are several reasons for this. First, the wetlands,
lakes, regional park, and extensive freeway system (518 acres
by itself) use 42 per cent of Lino Lakes land area. This
unproductive land - in terms of tax payments - makes the
provision of city services expensive. For example in cities
such as Fridley and Robbinsdale and Richfield the snowplow
and police can serve 1,000 residents much quicker than in
Lino Lakes. The barriers of two freeways, and a 2700 acre
Page 9
park simply are not present in those cities. And on a micro -
scale those other cities have dense development with few if
any wetlands separating the developed areas.
A second reason for high property taxes in Lino Lakes is the
abundance of large -lot single-family developments. In the
west part of the city there are approximately 1000 acres of
one and 2 1/2 acre lot subdivisions. The density is so low
that costs for snowplowing and .police protection are
abnormally high and are reflected in higher property taxes
for each individual dwelling. In the east part of Lino Lakes
there are about 200 acres of large lot development.
A third reason for high property taxes is the lack of a
commercial and industrial base. Minnesota's property tax
laws are such that residences pay relatively low taxes.
Commercial and industrial structures on the other hand can
contribute as high as five per cent of their market value and
annual property -tax payment. Residential rates by comparison
presently start at about one per cent of the first $68,000 of
value.
A fourth reason for the city's high property taxes concern
the school districts and their level of services and tax
base. As discussed in the section on Manufactured and mobile
homes, the Centennial School District has a very large number
of residences from which it gets little tax money. Again,
the result is the taxes lived against the available tax base
become relatively high.
The hidden problem with this situation is that little money
is available for improving services or infrastructure. Parks
cannot be expanded, recreation programs are lost in the
budget scramble to basic services such as police and fire,
and programs for periodic road and utility improvements never
get started.
In Lino Lakes the issue of property taxes and tax base
planning are so overriding that they must be considered in
land use planning.
Commercial and Industrial Land Use Needs: In September of
1987 the Metropolitan Council published the results of its
study of land use in the Twin Cities Area. The people at the
council had studied aerial photos and after some field
checking determined their measurements of different land uses
were within 1.5 percent of being totally accurate. That's
not bad.
The Metro Council study gave totals for several different
land uses for each minor civil division in the area. Totals
were also provided for combinations of places such as "inner
ring suburbs". As a point of information Lino Lakes is in
what was defined as the "developing ring suburbs."
Page 10
J`t
Following are two tables that compare Lino Lakes to other
places. the first table compares the city to its neighbors.
From that we can see:
1. With the exception of Blaine NONE of the city's
neighbors has more than 2.5 percent of its total
area in industrial land uses. In fact, there is
little industrial land in the whole northeast
sector.
2. With the exception of Lexington, no place has more
than 2.0 percent of its land in commercial uses.
3. Lino Lakes, Columbus Township (Carlos Avery), and
White Bear Township (Ramsey County) have
extraordinary amounts of land in public and park
categories.
4. With the exception of Blaine there is little
industrial development in this area, i.e. the
possibility of spin-off industrial development is
low.
5. Please note, Blaine with almost 30,000 population,
a land area almost identical to Lino Lakes, and a
large shopping mall has only 1.6 percent of its
total area in commercial land uses.
6. With regard to Blaine, also note that more than ten
percent of its area is used for industrial
purposes. This reflects a policy decision of that
city to emphasize industrial development.
Historically it has used tax increment financing
and Industrial Development Bonds to help this
activity.
LAND USE IN LINO LAKES AND
ADJACENT PLACES BY PERCENTAGE, 1984
PLACE RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL VACANT OTHER TOTAL
Lino Lakes
9.3
0.4
0.2
57.9
32.2
100.0
Circle Pines
39.5
0.4
1.2
43.2
15.7
100.0
Centerville
19.3
1.1
0.4
63.9
21.3
100.0
Columbus
Township
5.2
0.1
0.0
57.3
37.4
100.0
Lexington
69.9
0.0
8.0
12.9
9.2
100.0
rti
Page 11
11'ti
QQ
Blaine 18.2 10.2 1.6 63.7 6.3 100.0
White Bear
Township 21.2 2.5 0.4 35.2 40.7 100.0
Shoreview 36.9 1.7 0.8 30.4 30.2 100.0
North Oaks 28.6 0.0 0.1 48.4 22.9 100.0
* Percentages are calculated to two decimal points and
rounded off. Some places have a few acres in the land
use categories but not enough to reach 0.1 percent of
the total.
** Includes highways, lakes and streams, public and park
land.
The second table compares Lino Lakes land uses to other
developed cities. From that table use can make the
generalizations:
1. Developed cities have relatively more land in
commercial and industrial land uses than do
developing cities.
2. Roseville and New Hope, two cities that have
emphasized industrial uses have more than 11
percent of their land areas in industrial uses.
3. Population base is necessary to support commercial
activity, i.e. you don't see stores sitting out in
the middle of the county waiting for subdivisions.
LAND USE IN SELECTED, DEVELOPED
CITIES BY PERCENTAGE, 1984
PLACE RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL VACANT OTHER TOTAL
Anoka
35.5
0.7
4.1
23.6
36.1
100.0
Minneapolis
52.4
14.7
5.0
2.3
25.6
100.0
New Hope
57.3
12.2
2.9
10.0
17.5
100.0
Osseo
43.7
8.2
17.8
7.5
22.8
100.0
St. Paul
46.9
12.9
4.7
6.8
28.7
100.0
Brooklyn
Center
55.2
3.8
8.2
9.5
23.3
100.0
Roseville
46.7
11.3
6.0
10.9
25.1
100.0
Page 12
North
St. Paul 60.5 3.6 5.1 15.8 15.0 100.0
Lino Lakes 9.3 0.4 0.2 57.9 32.2 100.0
Conclusion: If the city reserves more than 3.0 percent of
its area for commercial purposes or 5.0 percent for .
industrial purposes it should be prepared to promote and aid
in the development of that land. From the examples we've
seen here commercial and industrial development doesn't
happen spontaneously -as evidenced by the fact that some
places have very little of either.
On the positive side some of the cities with hivher amounts
of commercial and industrial land have strong financial
situations, are able to finance high land city services, and
have relatively low tax rates. Industrial promotion
activities would seem justified for Lino Lakes.
The unbuildable Land Situation: Lino Lakes is a unique city
in at least one measure. Of the city's 21,337 acres only
about 43 per cent of 12,230 acres is buildable. As the
acreage summary table indicates wetlands, parks, lakes and
freeways take more than two -fifths of the city's total area.
The table, which shows the land areas of the various sewer
service districts as well as other areas where sewer
extension is not practical, shows a second significant fact.
Of the 12,340 buildable acres one-third is already gone -used
up.
As noted earlier more than 1,000 acres of the developed land
area have been used for large lot single-family subdivisions.
At this point in time slightly more than half of all
dwellings in the city are on large lots with no public
utilities. While this may provide some residents with "elbow
room" it certainly is a burden on the city in providing
services.
When 8,000 acres of unbuildable land is added to the equation
Lino Lakes ability to provide reasonable city services (at a
reasonable cost) is severely strained.
Lino Lakes needs to get as much tax return as possible from
its remaining developable land. To not do so is to test its
viability as a city.
Page 13
'100 \
,," N
LAND AVAILABILITY IN LINO LAKES
BY SEWER SERVICE DISTRICT, 1990
Existing
Platted Land
or Homes
(Acres)
Vacant Unbuildable
Buildable Land (Lake
Land or Wetland
(Acres) (Acres)
Total
Dist.
Area
(Acres)
Sewer District
#1
920
1,291
795
3,006
Sewer District
#2
2000
2,270
234
4,504
Sewer District
#3
30
370
32
432
Sewer District
#4
23
177
65
263
Sewer District
#5
543
880
612
2,035
Sewer District
#6
59
10
35
104
Southeast Area
320
555
78
1,135
*Otter Lake
182
Northeast Area
160
2,594
239
3,567
*Rondeau Lake
232
*Peltier Lake
342
Northwest Area
40
100
773
913
County Park
2,621 (Park
Land)
*Baldwin Lake
222
*Rice Lake
434
*Reshanau Lake
331
*Marshan Lake
229
*George Watch
Lake
538
*Centerville Lake
480
*Peltier Lake
(North Arm)
115
Freeways
518
*35W
251
*35E
267
TOTALS
4,095
8,245
12,340*
21,447
*Includes 2,863
acres
of wetland, 2621
acres of actual park
land, 3,105 acres
of lake surface and
518 acres of freeway.
City streets,
county
roads, and
state
highways are not
included.
Citizen Input - The People Speak: In 1988 the park board and
the city council sponsored a mail survey of residents in the
city. The final analysis of the survey was more than 50
pages long, a summary however would reveal the following:
*The best things about Lino Lakes were the city's open
spaces, small town and rural atmosphere, peace and
quiet, trees, and good locations within the Twin Cities
Metropolitan area.
*On the needs side of the ledger were lower taxes (no
surprise) more development of major retail
establishments, family restaurants and a city clean-up.
Page 14
With regard to park facilities and recreation programs the
survey found:
*The five most highly desired additions to park
facilities and activities were:
1. Hiking/walking/jogging trails
2. Bicycling trails
3. Youth recreation programs
4. Teen recreation programs
5. Restrooms in parks
*The five least desired additions to park facilities and
activities were:
1. Indoor ice arena
2. Outdoor swimming pool
3. Indoor swimming pool
4. Snowmobile trails (tie)
5. Exercise courses
Urban Use of the Land: Can Lino Lakes take advantage of its
environment without destroying it? What leads to -residential
satisfaction?
Similar questions were recently asked in Ann Arbor, Michigan,
and their resolution by researcher Rachel Kaplan can be of
benefit to Lino Lakes. Kaplan tried to determine how the
immediate physical environment affected neighborhood
satisfaction. What she found was unexpected. The overall
amount of open space was not the key to residential
satisfaction and greenbelts and large mowed urban parks did
little in improving neighborhood satisfaction. The amenities
really valued were small "pieces of nature." Kaplan found:
Rather than large open areas and mowed expanses,
residents expressed a desire and a delight in smaller
areas that have trees and shrubs.
The influence of the pieces of nature was such that even
parking lots could be perceived by local residents as
positive neighborhood influences if they included small areas
of trees and shrubs.
,•� To provide for residential satisfaction Kaplan argued that
Page 15
preserving small natural areas at the time of construction is
of paramount importance. This is not to downplay the
importance of landscaping sites with transplants as Kaplan
notes that birds can sing in small as well as large trees.
Kaplan's main finding, however, is that the arrangement of
the pieces of nature is the most important consideration in
providing neighborhood satisfaction. In particular, Kaplan's
research showed that:
By distributing open space in closer proximity to the
residential clusters and by making the clusters smaller,
the existing open space can be made to serve residents
far more effectively.
Certainly the city's natural environment provides it with
opportunities not available to other places. However these
opportunities can be lost without considerable attention to
site planning and to those city ordinances dealing with
amenities.
As Kaplan's Ann Arbor research showed place satisfaction was
achieved with skilled use of the natural environment. Again,
in those instances where the open space was unusable or where
the parking lots were sterile, residents were not as content.
i,.N Lino Lakes will probably become one of the fastest growing
communities in the metro area's north side. To -guarantee
future neighborhood satisfaction and the proper use of
Kaplan's pieces of nature the city should continue to review
development plan and subdivisions with goals of preserving
wetlands and wooded areas - even if only "pieces of nature."
GOALS
Goals are very broad and general statements meant only to
guide the planning process. Policies are more definitive
position statements meant to further direct city activities
that will lead to implementation of the adopted goals.
Policies can become important guidelines in routine matters
as they provide direction in such daily tasks as plat and
site plan review. They also are useful where ordinances and
other implementation tools are unclear or open to
interpretation.
Standards are even more specific statements of actions to be
undertaken by the city. Standards also are the result of
deliberations choosing from many different options that might
implement the goals and policies. Actually then standards
constitute a list of detailed recommendations for action.
They are the final quantifiable product of the planning
process. In the section outlining the plan, the "standards"
are called "recommendations."
This brief chapter of the plan is meant to list the goals for
�Y
Page 16
W
16*\.
land use and community facilities activities. The policies
and recommendations - those things that constitute the plan -
are found in the chapter titled "Plan Recommendation."
Housing and Residential Land Uses: As was noted in the
inventory and analysis, the resident questionnaire noted a
strong wish to maintain the city's environment and open and
natural atmosphere. The natural environment was a strong
factor in attracting -persons to the city and an attribute
they wish preserved.
GOAL 1: To protect and maintain environmental amenities
in residential areas.
Other post -World War II suburban communities are now
concerned about maintenance of their housing stocks. In many
instances, the dwellings were all built about the same time
and will soon need major repair. Large areas of
deteriorating housing can have a negative effect on both a
city and its residents.
GOAL 2: To have quality housing developments able to
maintain long term residential property value.
With its neighbors exhausting their land availability, Lino
Lakes has become the focus of attention for many developers
and builders looking for buildable lots.
GOAL 3: To increase Lino Lakes' supply of executive
homes providing the city a good mix of residential
housing opportunities.
GOAL 4: To maintain and promote home designs that show
better curb appeal especially with "general market"
housing.
The sudden interest in developing land in Lino Lakes can lead
to euphoria and an over -extension of utilities.
GOAL 5: To limit lot inventories to a total that can be
absorbed into the market within a two year period,
with a one year supply in planning stages.
Presently Lino Lakes has only four units of multiple -housing.
With a population soon approaching 10,000 persons, this
situation excludes persons wishing to reside in rental
housing or housing requiring limited maintenance.
GOAL 6: To promote development of limited numbers
of multiple -family residences.
Page 17
/'\
The large lots measuring between one and five acres have been
voracious users of scarce buildable land. They have cost the
city future tax base (by using extraordinary amounts of land)
and have cost the city relatively large amounts for city
services.
GOAL 7: To create no additional unsewered lots with an
area less than ten acres.
Commercial and Industrial Land Uses: -The city presently has
only limited commercial and industrial development. This
results in: 1) few local job opportunities, 2) longer
shopping trips, and 3) high residential property taxes. To
rectify this situation Lino Lakes has created the Economic
Development Committee.
GOAL 8: To actively pursue commercial development
adjacent to the city's two diamond interchanges.
GOAL 9: To reserve adequate amounts of commercial and
industrial land for both present and future development.
GOAL 10: To permit only quality, well planned, and well
designed development within the commercial and
industrial areas.
The city has the vestiges of a commercial strip adjacent to
Lake Drive. The strip also has some industrial land uses.
GOAL 11: To redevelop the Lake Drive commercial
and industrial area from I-35W to the city's north
corporate line.
PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
A very common weakness of land use plans is generality. The
text becomes so vague that even after reviewing a plan the
reader is left with little idea about what real victims have
been prescribed. For example, it's common to find goals or
policies that read something like "save the environment" or
"protect the environment". What does this mean? Obviously
it could mean any of a hundred things.
Actually Lino Lakes has been guilty of this in the past - not
to worry though, the city is in Vood company. In its current
plan amendment the first policy is:
"Future community development shall take into account
social, economic, and environmental opportunities and
constrains in an effort to provide an optional
arrangement of future land use activities."
With this plan amendment the city of Lino Lakes wishes to
adopt a plan that lists specific policies and recommendations
Page 18
/"%k
for the city to follow in guiding development over the next
several years. Following are the eleven goals presented
earlier in the plan as well as policies guiding city actions
on overall development strategy. In fact, the policies might
very well be called strategies. Most important however are
the "recommendations." These are the actual )obs or work
tasks that must be completed to bring about implementation of
this plan.
Goal°1."To protect and maintain environmental- amenities -in
residential areas.
Policy 1A. The city should consider Planned Unit Development
housing requests (that do not exceed current residential
densities) designed to save exceptional natural features.
Recommendation No. 1. Create an overlay PUD district
for residential development.
Recommendation No. 2. Continue to protect wetlands and
other water recharge areas in accordance with U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, and
watershed district rules and regulations.
Recommendation No. 3. Require a tree protection plan in
1,••111 all residential developments in accordance with the
recommendations of the city forester.
Recommendation No. 4. Use existing wetlands for storm
water retention. If on -site ponding is the only
feasible alternative the pond should appear natural and
be landscaped accordingly.
Recommendation No. 5. Amend the city's subdivision
ordinance to require planting of at least one boulevard
tree for each new residential lot. The trees should
come from a list of species provided by the city
forester.
Policy 2A. The city should protect areas adjacent to new
developments from environmental degradation.
Recommendation No. 6. Require silt fences and other
materials and practices to reduce erosion.
Recommendation No. 7. In the limited areas of the city
where there is no tree cover and where substantial earth
work is required, the land should be seeded to rye grass
following grading. This should be required in
developer's agreements.
Recommendation No. 8. The city should accept no
environmentally sensitive areas as park land. Only
areas with limited plant and animal carrying capacity
should be developed as active play areas.
Page 19
ka
Policy 3A. Existing and planned residential areas should be
protected from noise, unsightliness, traffic, and air
pollution generated by commercial and industrial areas.
Recommendation No. 9. Site plans for commercial and
industrial developments adjacent to residential
neighborhoods are to be approved only if berming and
planting of deciduous plant material provides a 90 per
cent opaque screen.
Recommendation No. 10. All commercial and industrial
site plans must include provisions that: 1) all
exterior lighting be hooded, 2) all trash containers be
fenced, 3) green areas be irrigated, 4) parking lots
have green islands and are bermed, 5) outside storage be
at a minimum.
Recommendation No. 11. No commercial or industrial
development should be permitted that is not served by an
arterial or collector street.
Goal 2. To have quality housing developments able to maintain
long term residential property value.
/, Policy 2A. Provide access to the city's natural areas, active
play areas, and other neighborhoods.
Recommendation No. 12. Require extension of the city's
trail system in all new residential developments.
Recommendation No. 13. Revise the city's park plan to
show locations of future city parks and revise methods
of acquiring and developing the parks.
Recommendation No. 14. Trail surfacing and some park
development should be completed early in any
subdivisions development.
Recommendation No. 15. With trail and park development
connectivity should be mandatory. A north -south
connection across Birch Street and I-35W should be
developed. In addition an east -west connection in the
area of T.H. 49 should be a priority item.
Policy 2B. The appearance and liveability of older housing
units should be maintained.
Recommendation No. 16. Adopt a housing maintenance code.
Recommendation No. 17. Require an acquisition program
for deteriorated housing.
Recommendation No. 18. Extension of city utilities, area
Page 20
.1
wide drainage with curb and'gutter, and improved streets
and roads should be encouraged in all residential areas
developed prior to 1980.
Recommendation No. 19. For areas where curb exists, the
city should implement a boulevard beautification
program.
Recommendation No. 20.. Use park dedication money from
nearby new subdivisions to improve park_ facilities in
established neighborhoods.
Recommendation No. 21. Require the city planner and city
building official to prepare an amend report for review
by the economic development committee, design review
board. economic development authority, and city council
of the general condition of the city's housing stock.
Changes over the last calendar year should be noted and
recommendations for changes in ordinances or city policy
should be made where appropriate.
Goal 3. To increase Lino Lake's supply of custom built homes,
providing the city a good mix of residential housing
opportunities.
Policy 3A. Provide development opportunities for higher -value
single family homes.
Recommendation No. 22. Reserve areas on the south shore
of Reshanau Lake for the R-1X Single Family Executive
housing district.
Policy 3B. Provide R-1X housing opportunities in parts of the
city other than Birch Street.
Recommendation No. 23. Increase the number of R-1X lots
on the city's east side.
Recommendation No. 24. Extend sewer and water utilities
to the high amenity area north of Main Street and west
of Lake Drive.
Goal 4. To maintain and promote home designs that show better
curb appeal especially with "general market" housing.
Policy 4A. Educate builders regarding city desires to build a
quality community.
Recommendation No. 25. Continue the annual Builder's Day
meetings.
Recommendation No. 26. Provide developers and builders
with cooperative promotional material emphasizing Lino
Lakes as being a quality community.
Page 21
Recommendation No. 27. Work with. developers in
preparation of restrictive covenants for their projects
that add to curb appeal, e.g. require roof pitches to be
6:12 rather than 5:12.
Recommendation No. 28. Develop and adopt more
restrictive ordinances for the maintenance of "pieces of
nature" as well as general tree cover.
Goal S. To limit lot inventories to a total that can be
absorbed into the market within a two year period, with a one
year supply in planning stages.
Policy 5A. Work closely with metropolitan area agencies
responsible for provisions of infrastructure items.
Recommendation No. 29. Complete by January 1991 all
planning/engineering items required by the Metropolitan
Council at time of Metropolitan Urban Services Area
Amendment.
Recommendation No. 30. Limit new sewer hookups in Sewer
Service Area 1 (Birch Street) to 100 annually until the
Laurene Street lift station is rebuilt.
100*11 Recommendation No. 31. Limit new sewer hookups in
Pheasant Hills to 20 annually until a permanent sewer
connection can be provided by the MWCC for eastern Lino
Lakes.
Policy 5B. Maintain a viable housing market within the city.
Recommendation No. 32. Maintain a lot inventory of 400
lots (a two-year supply) with an additional 200 lots in
the planning stage.
Recommendation No. 33. Require all but the smallest in -
fill developments to be phased. (This brings in a larger
number of developers and builders and creates a more
active market as well as diversity in housing styles).
Recommendation No. 34. The city building official and
city planner should catalogue new housing permits
showing both location by Sewer Service Area and dollar
value. The information should be made available to the
city's elected and appointed officials.
Recommendation No. 35. These criteria should be used to
determine priority in subdividing land: 1) proximity to
an existing trunk line, 2) inventory needs for
"executive" or "general market" housing, 3) place -in -
line. The city council on the advise of the design
review board and economic development committee should
Page 22
determine the pattern of subdivision.
Goal 6. To promote development of limited numbers of
multiple -family residences.
Recommendation No. 36. Promote development of existing
multiple -family -zoned land.
Recommendation No. 37. Rezone the "Erickson Property"
near Elm Street -and Sunrise Drive to an R-3 density.
Recommendation No. 38. Consider on a request basis other
rezonings for multiple -family use where: 1) the parcels
are small, 2) the land is adjacent to a collector
street, 3) the structures will be compatible with
adjacent single family structures.
Policy 6B. Senior housing should be available in Lino Lakes.
Recommendation No. 39. Use private sector vendors to
build and market senior housing units.
Recommendation No. 40. Use tax increment financing to
underwrite development of senior housing.
Policy C. Multiple family residences should be attractive,
inviting places to live.
Recommendation No. 41. The design review board should
carefully examine site plans and architectural plans
to ensure contemporary and aesthetically pleasing
structures are located in the city, i.e. no rows of
boxes with seas of asphalt parking areas. ,
Goal 7. To create no additional unsewered residential lot
with an area less than ten acres.
Policy 7A. Promote residential development only within the
MUSA boundary.
Recommendation No. 42. Eliminate the 2 1/2 acre minimum
lot sizes from the zoning ordinance.
Recommendation No. 43. Require ten acre minimum lot
sizes in all areas outside the MUSA boundary.
Recommendation No. 44. Within the MUSA boundary permit
no subdivisions of property where the new, vacant
parcels are not served by city utilities.
Policy 7B. Ensure that development in the city's rural areas
does not preclude or interfere with future.
Recommendation No. 45. Review all ten acre subdivisions
Page 23
for future street and utility easements. Where
necessary (as determined by the city engineer) require
easements as a condition of minor subdivision approval.
Goal 8. To actively pursue commercial development adjacent to
the city's two diamond interchanges.
Policy 8A. Develop commercial and industrial land adjacent to
the freeway interchanges in a sequential manner.
Recommendation No. 46. Complete a long range land use
plan and feasibility report for both areas. The land
use plan should address location of land uses, road
plans, sequential development or phasing, and it should
determine the trigger mechanism used to start expansion
of the area.
Policy 8B. Use city resources to promote development where
required and within the limits of the city charter.
Recommendation No. 47. Establish a low interest
industrial development loan fund to be administered
through the economic development authority.
Recommendation No. 48. Create an Economic Development
A*I*N Authority to work directly with developers.
Goal 9. To reserve adequate amounts of commercial and
industrial land for both present and future developments.
Policy 9A. The city should expand the I-35E Industrial
Corridor.
Recommendation No. 49. A business reserve zoning
district should be created, permitting present
residential and farm land uses.
Recommendation No. 50. Land should be zoned for
business development in a sequential and measured
manner.
Recommendation No. 51. Development should start near the
interchange and expand north only as land needs require.
Goal 10. To permit only quality, well planned, well designed
development within commercial and industrial areas.
Policy 10A. Maintain high standards for all commercial and
industrial areas.
Recommendation No. 52. Severely limit outside storage in
the industrial and commercial zoning districts.
Recommendation No. 53. Require masonry exteriors for all
Page 24
r°y
non-residential buildings. Smooth face concrete masonry
units (current blocks) should not be used for exterior
building surfaces.
Recommendation No. 54. Site planning efforts should
ensure that Koplan's "piece of nature" concepts are
found in all commercial developments brought before the
design review board and city council.
Policy 10B. Residential areas should be screened from
commercial and industrial uses.
Recommendation No. 55. All development plans submitted
to the city for review for land adjacent to the
residential area west of 20th Avenue North, should show
all season screening and landscaping.
Recommendation No. 56. All parking lots should be
screened and bermed.
Goal 11. To redevelop the Lake Drive commercial and
industrial area from I-35W to the city's north corporate
line.
Policy 11A. Removal of incompatible land uses and businesses
from Lake Drive.
Recommendation No. 57. Complete a redevelopment plan for
the Lake Drive Corridor.
Recommendation No. 58. Driveways serving individual
business on Lake Drive should be permitted only if the
lot is greater than 33,000 square.
Recommendation No. 59. A landscaped front yard free of
parking and advertising should be established.
Recommendation No. 60. A unifying theme for landscaping
and/or architecture should be determined for the strip
between I-35W and Lake Drive.
IMPLEMENTATION
The first parts of this document provided an inventory and
analysis of present and projected conditions within Lino
Lakes. From this inventory 11 goals meant to direct future
planning activities were developed. The third section of the
document presented the plan using the goals to develop
planning policies and most important 58 specific planning
recommendations. This section represents the fourth and
final step in the planning process - the establishment of
specific steps to implement the recommendations from "the
plan" section.
Page 25
/'*114�
PROCEDURES
The first step in implementing the plan is to adopt it as an
official policy of the city. This is the responsibility of
the city council on recommendation from the design review
board. The actual process for adopting the revised land use
and community facilities plan is outlined in Minnesota
Statutes and is as follows:
1.
A public hearing on the plan must be held by the
"planning agency."
2.
The planning agency - in this case the planning
commission - recommends the plan or revises the
plan to the city council (M.S. 462, Subd. 2).
3.
The city council has two options if it wishes to
adopt the plan:
a. Give the plan preliminary approval and submit
it to the Metropolitan Council for its review.
b. Give final approval contingent on Metropolitan
Council review and approval.
4.
The Metropolitan Council receives the plans "...to
determine their compatibility with each other
(other cities plans) and with metropolitan systems
plans" (M.S. 473.175, Subd. 1).
5.
The Metropolitan Council determines whether the
plan constitutes a minor or major change within 10
days of receipt of the plan.
a. A minor change allows the city to implement
the plan within 10 days.
b. A major change will be reviewed within 90
days. Implementation can be effective after
determination of compatibility by the
Metropolitan Council.
6.
If the city council granted only preliminary
approval before submittal to the Metropolitan
Council it now considers final approval. After
approval implementation can begin.
With regard to actual implementation of the plan, Minnesota
Statutes give Lino Lakes several methods of bringing the
recommendations to reality. Shown below are seven categories
of actions and which of the recommendations each can
implement. Some plan recommendations are found in more than
one category of action.
Page 26
Recommendation To
Action Be Implemented.
Zoning Ordinance Revision: 1, 33, 37, 38,
42, 43, 48, 49, 51,
52, 54,
Subdivision Ordinance Revision: 5, 28, 44
Other City Ordinance.Revision: 3, 47
Capital Improvement Program: 18, 23, 24, 30, 31,
35
Tax Increment Financing District: 17, 40
Administrative/Other Actions: 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11,
21, 25, 26, 27, 32,
33, 34, 36, 39, 41,
45, 46, 50, 53, 55,
56, 57, 58
Park Board 8, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20
Coordinate Implementation With 2, 27
Other Agencies And Units:
Finally a work of caution. Lino Lakes is one of the fastest
changing cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Under
general circumstances comprehensive plans are reviewed every
five years and certainly this plan should be reviewed in
1995. However, if major changes occur before 1995, e.g.
completion of a major highway improvement, the plan should be
reviewed sooner. No greater disservice can be given to a
city by its planning process than its failure to continuously
monitor community -wide change and, in turn, to position the
city to benefit most from that change. Because society
itself is not static, planning must be a continuing process.
Page 27
Optional Pond Enhancement
l House side Pond side \
n>ox + min. \
1. varies 11
Excavated material to be placed
above el. 890.02
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE
' - VARIES i
VARIES 16, _ -I ' VAR ES
MAX. SLOPE 3:1
MIN. SLOPE N'/FT
2, 2, 2, 2 2'
}} f
T.V J L
V.TEL. �I- i BIT, MAT. MHD 2341TELELEC2" BIT. BASE MHD 2331 . ELEC.
GAS GAS I
5"CLASS5 GRAVEL _ I
PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE i
1
OTORM OSAN. OW.M.
10' 10'
GROUND 1I�.
24 i t
IN
42 �9 i
T.V.. MIN., URBAN STREET I.
PERMANENT SECTION
TEL'ELEC. CITY OF LINO LAKES
JUNE 1990 1 CRNG. NO. 22R1
Wire mesh reinforcement
(optional) Engineering fabric
Metal or woo
post or stake
Fabric anchorage
trench backtin with
tamped natural soil
Direction of 1`/
runoff flow
;.••. :i'( 8 inch minimum
Natural soil I('-j'1I
w 1. 6 inch minimum
Note: Depending upon configuration, attach fabric to wire mesh with
hog rings, steel posts with tie wires, or wood posts with staples..
Typical Installation for silt fence
i
POND SUBCUT O
l C,,, �', Q Volume required = 4.8 x 0.5 x .32" = 2,788 cubic feet
Subcut prop sed = 40' 40' bottom at el. 894.4 , 5;1 sideslopes
�✓ �� \
I yr HWL= @ '�•-..`...,. �l I /
y t. ' __�_ , IOOyr HWL 8 i3
s _._-' ; ,See Weir Detail`
Drampg asement
�Detention Pond-0
/
895 `_ I--, 89$
i 902
-- � 300 \ Lowest allowable floor el. adjacent
898 ` to detention pond
A�ssa
dJ:Y
e 2
t
GA
d�Y
"-"•-�Rssaaa7S
aL oa
�i9
_qqq�Y
-
----LAB
aL
'd�:Y
-•-' AL
La�Y
:�:•:•��iAz7ca:
Al�c
aRA:AA:aA___AS
Weir Detail
Oembed sides of weir into slope
2 6"
897.6 -
4'x 4"
896.73- 4 896.4 xisting 24°
�G�O c
�(ld 3a •oD° bG 6u& 00
C °oG'0 00
o f rj J 0 C) 0 0
VV
Treated wood, galvanized bolts
a
a (3
B
5
G I✓tf-,OP
>: a O O06
3 CY I-1/2• clear crushed rock,
18' depth atop filter fabric
_ 1 00 e 90 - \- 900, 0
s i 90L8 901.5 0 ' � ,p \
i
J 0%.0(-�
n SWO swo 904.2 -�
H
90 904.7 $}'� O g00 3 \ go0 0 f ! ` 898 �i :t ` -... V _ -`Jt7 . ✓
\ / \
06 04
Straw Drop inlet Sediment Filter
11 Compacted Soil
t,
t
ti
(to prevent
Staked
r�
piping)
Straw Bale
t
Runoff Water
Filtered
�a
with Sedimer:-_
-.ter
►
I
o.
_�Il
•°.
%-I
Straw Bales Bales 12" - 24"
Staked with 2 �i from Inlet
Stakes per Bale
This method of inlet protection is applicable where the inlet drains a
relatively flat upstream area (slopes less than 3%) and where sheet or
overland flow is typical. This method should not be used for inlets
receiving concentrated flows.
Source: Michigan Soil Erosion and Sediinent�lion@lion
Control QqiLe Book
a► • r a t • tr ■ r
�
�t 1 fi iS11 IY? dl /
■
■
o r • ■ t �
a
lull
E III ai
903. I o In o 900 ���Qd
' I L0 0.5 rn 8 f 900 rpx \ t4 CD
O - - - - 9.6 t \ m '\ I i 1 �____
Q, 904
905.0 904.7 2 89T0 1 0.5 I i I 1 9 m q \ al al In ,n �y N.
to
r t I i SWO SWO 903.E �O I O.ti% /' / m o~i 0)
901.8 I 901.5 , m91
swo { °P 0 t i fi
900 n �iF1,11
m t d ao 4� 890 @9>, / ! 896
011 NIJ
900.4m n°Drn s
- x
896A 896A +952 896.f 24" _ b
Qi 90? 894.0
''^^ �396� I 896 i j{
V J: 89 I I t
U 902.0 t
01.3 1 900 900.1 r!3 899.6 1 899.0 I I 8985 8979 89Z2 ! I ' 897.0 1 896.8 \ 895.6
swo I tI
SW0 , swo SWO I SWd { "\-wo swo I swo swo SWq; swo 0 \ \swo t s�
i 906.0 9052
1 \ 8906/ 9p4.g 903.9 9033 \� 902.8 902.2 901.7 901.1 90b. 900.2 900.0$8 q .}
'0
\900 , t1_ 4
Kj
904.gg1 -- o -' 902.2 O 1 I I
o' d� 0.7 ° 888.5 904 898 y Eh
906.2 \ 902 900
905.6
I 904.9 4.4\; 903.8 03. 902.7 902. 901.5 900.9 900. t 8993 898.E
swo :S:W:o
t 1
1 I SWO Swo i SWO Sw0 SWO SWO SWO SWO t SE SE �3
" >-1 ,_ ►-
l 903.0 I 902.4
901.7 901.2 900.6 9.5 i 898.9 I 898.3 897.7 1 (r 897.3 I-- 99. I w
f I
j ( 9p0 898
\ 1 896
s
V.
)7Z�89 6
902
894
900 /ll 898 \
898 ^ �\
16- I i 9 3.I '1. 1
902.1, I \ A :I I 897.7 1 89Z3\ 899.3 890 1 8'98A
1 SWO 901.3 1 900.E 900.0 899.5 1 89 19 898.3 I I
I IND
SWO I ^•t J� SE
907.0 63 Sw0 SWO SWO SWO SWO 1 SWO SWO SWO JiSE %
9 SE
\
I \ - 9� l _ 905.3 898.0 -
- - _ �.5-^�03.8 903.2 902.7 `, 902.1 901-5 900 9 900.5 _ - 898.7
t \` 902 9 898
x I
I.2%Ell
Notes:
0
1) Erosion Control Implementation Schedule X
a) Install silt stop fences belowareasto be graded
W R. NELSON ERING,'..'.'.,'...'.
b) Construct weir prior to gradinq in that vicinity _- / Rice Lake Court 1460 93rd Lane NE Blaine, MN 55434 (612) 784-7390
c) Proceed with rough grading
d)Seed disturbed areas outside R/W within 10 days of grading - -
Wenzel Farms
e) Maintain erosion control devices until permanent vegetation Rice Lake Lane
2) Provide utility easements 20 feet in width centered on utilities-' Preliminary Grading Drainage &. utilit Plan
'3) Elevations and utilities subiect to final design y
4) All storm sewer outlets shall include Std Plate Mn/DOT 3133 City of L ino Lakes
o�
■-
ti✓ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT
Q WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE December 26, 1990 REG. NO. 14389
ii SITE DATA
oc !) Existing zoning R-1
V; Proposed zoning R-1 and R-4
Gross area 67.38 acres
ZOn' n Park dedication 3.4 acres
N�'V N jl Single family lots 100
�W ECS,E G p Q I Town house lots 75, Area = 19.1 Acres
Net density 2. 7 units/acre
4 N �' City sanitary sewer and watermain
Set backs R-1 zoning
Front 30 feet
�� \ I` iI Side 10 feet house
z �� c'g6Q� dos \ 3 W o W 5 feet garage
R/CHARD �� / 3/'' I C,) N 1 Rear 30 feet
N ZFL/n�!{q od o 'P290 \� F v v�i I v `� I Lot areas minimum of 10,800 square feet above 890.0 foot contour line
CG4/R 4Z2 / 4, Set backs R-4 zoning
W/LSO�t/ N�7 INA, h Q �,' Rear 30 feet
EASEM-E-N 41 Cr 40 feet state highway
/1 C.
,v Easements utility and drainage unless otherwise
S O°18'Og"'W N I W shown are 5 feet on side lot lines
10 feet on rear lot lines
FOUR T 2o9.Z3 �- . SO•? q.
AVENUE 33 33 27 tD5 45
110 PARK ONING
PRELIMINARY PLAT'
WENZEL FARMS
CITY OF LINO LAKES
OWNER Ester Noren, Personal '
Representative of Elsie J. Wenzel, deceased
5878 Lexington Avenue
Shoreview, Minnesota 55126
DEVELOPER Hokanson Development Inc.
Attn: Kirk Corson
9174 Isanti Street N.E.
Blaine, Minnesota 55434
786-3130
li h ,o 3.4 ACRES 5 �\
a 51DY �P,gRTNERSff/�° l% (j
2
,o ) �
5 4 3 -0 52 �, % I a
�, SB
0 24,150 18,400 °O
14,500 2 53\
�Q / GR�
° 1 3
54 Q T tcAl
W3 0 F R O N T S B L � o s 4 �-A A Zo s-O /9 80
OL Z 1Z.1
I o 5 ', S O ° G rn 5 5 R E A zo .Q �� B.QF-T. / s�
W I 5
CL /it/D. SCHOOL D/5T. lZ c� RED1,3ZTEAL COUR ° `' I 95
300
sT
6/ 62,63 64 65 \
110 l0
N = -- -- >0 5°� /So DRIVE m 6?i6 -9
z � PARK - _ - " 9 69 TO 71 72 173 74 75
}`n 8 to 9 �o I I 3.4 ACRES
2!
O000
- i 11,900 - I3,400'= IO O 6 ! 7 6 9 10
N 1 14, Zoo REAR SBL /3r /4 /5 20MiN/MUM \ --
v ! O 7 - - _ _ - - - - ---- /S / a. c. ro G RAGE
U N PRIVATE /
�\ 80 110
�. D . &
F�Z 8 80 80 + 80 80 80 8o go 80 80 90 �s
tw �( is 2O c'O 21 212324 25
ui 7 tr1 1io 2a
a 6 5 0 4 0 3 ,�in
60
56
57
58159
o� ,n 2612712829 30
31 32 33 34 :35]
14 300 to _ - ��
2 in I M 2 7! 2 6 2 5 �' 2 4 2 3 2 2 �- ------ - s -
�O 8 80 // OBO 'r' _ � _ co to rn ``� rn -�/ - - - - - G �
04/V/EL %ALL/E `q 11,200� �/ ODD /0,800 /0"600 /0,800 /0,800 I T /0,800 /0,600 - /0,800 //,200^ 14,200 oc�
21
\ SURFS/oE iNC•
105 80 -- -- -- -- -- --- ------ -- ii �-
80 80 80 go m R60 T 80 80 S8o 80 80 75
J�cK 7U,4BE Kzt- o _ 6 s i 20 9 R- 2050 - ---- --- ---- --- -- - - ------ �/ \ > _
IO R= 2050 1 WINTER -- -F 0 X LANE ---- ------ ---�. 0 1 Z , Soh /05 57.5 � , T 36 � ���,
F
w
s1 G fjE,QT DUP.PE d
z
O
Q
�
5
`
ltl
16 s2
I
o
14- 50--
CN
/O, 800
10,8
a0
C0
80
8
W
107
141611,9ZE /MARLOWELn
U
I
in
z
14
14,300
13
/0,800
-
"Q/CHARO CAl�LSON
1O 5
80
I
0
8
I9 \ 190 20 270 /�, 95
3
i �
18
N
4
10 37, 40o
io l �0 5 21 3 00
j 0
3 3 400 29 D 2 4, 2 00 _ - - 6 '� I
o a 8 50
S � �
15O 16
`fl R= ---- --- ----- ZOR cA 21,500 O 9 1 Q II N �1-
-
�R= z05;��„ ��CTIC _CRANE TRAIL ��390 ,�� cos I
BcIYO 6.4/969 W 1 10 W 80-
I 60 - -- -- ------ --- -- ------ - - - --- - -- - --- - - -- A ' `Q \ o �/
8
c
; F16 17 18
Ir� Cr 14, G50^ /0,800
ffEYiN ffE/L/.UG /p
w I07 80 80 8
U
0
z - 0�, 5 "1 14 Ln 13 v
a L1411300 ' /D 800 - /o, 800 /0 8
z COL//S MAT USNAii i W
O 31P 10 5 8o I - -
N TYP 8O
80
0
°
°
800
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
60 50 0
7
18 M
19
20
21 fi
22on
23
24
25)
26-
27 %s
00
/0, goo
/o, Soo
/0, 800
/o,goo
/0, 800
10, Boo
10,8(00
/o, goo
/0, 800
/S,Ooo
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
1-70
80
90
2
11 run,
10 �
9 m
8�
7�
6
5 m
4 �_
3 0
2
1
/0, 800
io, So_ o
/0, 800
101800
/o, goo
/0, Boo
/o, BOo
/0, 800
/a '300
/0 900
%5, ao
- �-
FRONT
---
- --
S B L
---
-
-gp -
--
80
$O !
80
m 80
80
80
80
��
go
O ^ /V FUTURE
1Z `n 3�' �� T STREET15
QD 10
V\ 14, 800 I715,100 h �° --� 4 ¢9a \ -
155 s 31,500 / o V
/ f.� � 57 SS J �
°- 3
26
1 14 14,400 O 31,�50 0 �� �4,
30
150 1 G0 J o ?
�I I Q W
try / cc Q. 4 0 J� z
13 0 12 �, OI 2 oD ,�� 0 1 m o
15,i50 IG,800 0 4z 4 s85 �� i `�
60 150 --- lro0 o REAR / pW L"�'
ISBL
--- `a � R= 2o5O zo R - a� 1 4
46 47 48 49
33 3 3 27 N 205 R= 2050 O�ll/OW__-L _T____.� L A NE.---- -------- I ryP R, f�� 48, 400 G25 I0�TRAIL / o
------
i ro ± \
9RNDLh i ' 0 U T L 0 T A T//= WEST L/NE OF LD T 2(o AUD . SUB. /5/ N O° 15 00 E 2 (,37. 8 1 YNE WE5 T L /NE OF LOT I 27 ROD. SUB. /J� /
C/VR/S TENSEN ! I 2050 5Q- �T
JAMES h'iLL ' I jo,y/�/ /i/Mn �d �H9EL THOMA6 I GEoRGE GUY f/E.PlZ ?Igmoy 6•L osrpEM M/CNAEL W14RRE^/ SALLY kUETf/E,Q ' ti1/CHAFE L/TTLE ' DOUGLA$ Cf/AFFEEI OE, Ty0/7: 91V I CHARLES >411j A.4 I N ci
O
9
800
°
2�
-
So
go.
80-
80
$0-
80
80_
80
80
80
9
0
C0
20 '0
21 ro
22�
23 M
24�
25
26 M
27�
"
28�
29�
30
r
10,800 -
/o, 800
/o, 800
i0,800
/D, 800-
io, 800
/o, BOo
/0, 800
/v, 800
/0, 800
16, G oo i
80
80
80
a o
80
80
80
So
ao
80
120
I I I
10 In
9
8 n
7 u)
6
5
� 4
� 3 2
oof
/0 800
/0,800
/0,800
10,800
/o,Boo
/o, 800
10,800
1 /0"800
/n, 800 101800
/Co,200 m
-
I -
FRONT
--
--
-- -
- -- - ---
-- I
--
--
S B L
$0
80
,° 80
80
80
80
80
go
80 80
1ZO
W.4 TSON
.4NoRZEJEWSK/
,BA9VZEX
I Z ULEG Ei4
i HOGAvI/
WAG BERG
--
4
II
G
�-
^ L -
t
2
n r�
L_ IV) �_ 1
./ 1 I v
�_
1
ZONING
R - 1
°
80
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
-
--
f
+�
39
32-
z� i
Za
3s
o
-----EASEMENT
LINE
All that part of Lots 26 and 27, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 151,
i
Anoka County, Minnesota which lies west of the westerly right
of way line of Lake Drive (also known as County State Aid
Highway No. 23) . AND all that part of Government Lot 2, Section
1
I-F-.__
-SETBACK LINE
18 3
17
20, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, City of Lino Lakes,
o
m
1
2
3
4
5
10
'
I
u-1
-
- LOT NUMBER
Anoka County, Minnesota which lies west of the westerly right
i
_
lip
�;
MARSHAN
of way line of Lake Drive (also known as County State Aid
128
10,800- --
LOT AREA
L-M-ST 12
LAKE
Highway No. 23) and which lies south of that parcel of land
38
3z
38
5
5
described in a Quit Clain Deed recorded in Book 296 of Deeds,
SITE
Page 295 on file and of .record in the Office of the County
Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota.
-- -
I
I
5 19
20
�
• R
� STREET
�
RICE
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my
REVISIONS
�
80
LAKE
direct Supervision c ), that, ,am a duly Registered Land Surveyor
JAN. 15 1991 ESMI T
I/ 7
under the laws of the state o,f Minnesota.
JAN.25 ,1991 TN.HSE.
TYPICAL
LOTS
m
STREET
Ronald J. Swenson, Registered Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 13297
December 26, 1990
1
I �
�U
L� L1
O 50 /00 /50 260
SCALE IN FEET
W.
SWENSON LAN® SURVEYING
827 NORWOOD ST. ANOKA ,MN. 55303 (612) 427 - 1020
OVO4 M1
0
Sletch Plan For:. TJ TG 11 LA IN 1i
CITY OF`LINv LAKES
AlF-jnii
C(
i ---N. LINE OF THE SW1/4 OF THE NE1/4 OF SEC. 8
W
N
89'56'18"E,-'
iv
N 89'56'18"E
_
660.00 -'
__ _ _ _ _
-- 453.88
--
135t
60t
135t
102t
192t 36t p O 195.00 1
1
'
(17576) o
0
7 9 TH
S T.
; 9
om 1
00
60
n
1
N
6 � 0
(11135t)
m
(12488)
m (27376)
5 n
< �o * N p O
60 166t
167t
60
135f
nB�C ^ (15160) CAR HOU G O 0
1
+' w
c 2
O
co
�
O
co
(, 0600)
ft00F
_ 0 7 �,
11.0 Z r—
m O
5770
(1166t)
15
O
(10800)
00
2
0 BD s
�° EXCEPTION
(17535)
135t
to
135t
y yS
728
R_6
- 0 s \'°
°° �� ; 92t I N 89'56'18"E
167t
(16982)
1 195.00 -
HWSE
60 +1 0 2 N yi
14
*
m
(14175)
4 0
o 45t 150t
o
m m (12605) ��'
(13300)
'� 60
3
3
148t
136t
0ti
z
(14197)
,� 8 2.3 0
'
--
n'
60
135t
83t 6��
°'S (t 3390) (14000)
ly��
0 3 %
o
0
_ _ z er�r•n�^ _
136t
R_279.35
150t o
�� �° (11115) N
of
*o OIS
w
�� °°
LANE ,�. ,°.
,56f 13
(22190)
�'�
s°.00
OIS LANE
oR=339
1k ,, a
2 i d
o
�o
sg�
x
�y
.35
60
tOSt
80t 7
/0° g2 ` u
$0 (1361i ~
54)
`
80
80.00-
(16710)
tic' 1561—_
Cc (11
150t
°° 1
N
o
a
13
41 �
" 12 "
10 � 60
12
c,7430)
11
(, 4265)
11
�(10900)
21
�, 5 o
135t
W
(14600)
(12350)
(16447) rn mj W
(15516)
m
(12000)
(11340)
_
109±
131t 185t
150t 173t
123t 80t 80t
80t
120t
SOt
m 2
�/
105t
80f 80t
80t 80f 80t lOSt
(10800)
(10800)co
135t
14175
( )
10800 (0800
( ) 1 )
'
(10800) 10800 (10800 14600
( ) -H > -H ( ) -H W
(,0800) (10800)
+i +I
H (, 6600) n -H
(10800)
+i �n
N g
�
10
14
n15M16�17n18n2
/
9 2 20n
(v�
7 08
"
" "
"
4,3
Q
-1
040,
(10800)
135t
w
60
105t
80t 80t
60
80t 80t 80t 105t
1 123t 1 80t I 80t
1 80t
80t
W
"�
M
ID
78TH
LAN ELO
0
N
rto
0cV
* 4
m
�
0
�
80t
80t
80t
cc
O f) 15t ( 03) 60
(15863)
u�
� r �
135t o
Ln 135t Q
r
1 N
?r --
(15525)
135t
60
0 2
(10300) m
135t
60
o +
3 0�
(13009) tt
7o � $
4
(17610)
y� �o
5
(17522)
105t
80t
80t
80t
80t
801
105t
{{ -H
-H
44
(10800)
(10800) -
(10800)
(10800) -
(10800)
(14600)
(14600)
APPROXIMA
E CENTER LI
E OF UNITE
POWER AS
OCIATION EASE
105t
80t
1 80t
80t
80t
80t
tOSt
—105t
80f
80t
80t
80t
80t
105t
(14600)
(10800)
(10800)
(10800)
(10800)
(10800)
(14000)
+I
.H
-H
-H
-H
n "
2 "
"
"
"
105t
80t
SOt
BOt
80t
SOt
105t
60
123t
80t
p
N '
r7 O
'c
6
— O
(16600)
(10800)^
(10800)�
(10800)
41
(`0800) l
LL
Z e
LL
NIT
r-
123t
80t
80t
1 80t
81t
F
--_-_-----
-H
---- 444-—
T
4
c
135t
r
v
m (11475) 0
60
135t
*
o
N
C
LL
-H 4
OAK LAN E "
0 t0 0 , 14
(15061)
i
105.06 801 803 80t 105t 60 70t %o S2yc
441
i
0
H
+, 94t
N
13 y
3
n 5 L1+0'n
ii
6 "
7
0
0 12
J>rx2Os� (, 5734)
PARK
(11570)
(10800) (10800)^
(10800)
(13586)
60
1fi514
44t
80t 80t
80t
71t
Z
15'5t
(4.5 AC.t)
204t
2 0
158t
of
�
�a
(13736)
8
R_60.00
(1E6706)
a
148t
-H
5 ?1°
52 .
�ryyr
W k20327) ° s0
6 N 1 0) -aO o
co 0 co 9 L 1
(10923) (12051) (12990) (126682) �y
f�
93t 60t 130t 30t 187t 135t
60 1307.49
WEST
W I \ - - - - S. LINE OF THE SW1/4 OF THE NE1/4 OF SE(C• 8
/—
m
Sletch, Plan For: HIGHLAND M.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
DOWS
COUNTY OF ANOKA
- - -N. LINE OF THE SW1 /4 OF THE NE1 /4 of SEC. 8
' W
N 89'56'18"E, N N 89'56'18"E
660.00 _ _
Q 453.88
' 135E 60f 135E 102E 192E 36JU�32
p � 195.00
O
(17576) O O N( 0 1
1 679TH ST. 79TH
0 o gp N (27376) `-
(10800) a) 1 0) z W O
135E (12488) a ,�o O O 60166E 1fi7t I60
135� m S E)aSnNG pO
�BLJ1G. (15160) CAR. HOUSE O ii di i{ }{
0 0 (10800) ROOF —U0p . ,,.0 z 1 0 15 -H W
o eLDG 15770) >
(,135± 00 0 2 00 ��� EXCEPTION ( (,7.35)
135E R=60 s 0 166E =
LD 135E 7288 00 �`x �s2f I N 89'56'18"E I 1�;7f
195.00 -- 60 �, w
ii � r O 2 Q
(16982) (14175) HOUSE 0 45t 150E 00 6 (12605) CO ,�1 ' 60
H °° LO LO o o (133(,0) ay
0 3 0 co ,� IQ ,�°� 148E 6`L
.(14197) ,�� 8 �� 2 3 N ,36E
60 6�� ��� 7 (13390) �� (14000) o
136E 135E 83tLp
A 150E � I o
s as3a72.1 R_279 . 35 5� �p �� o CO i� (11115) o 0
L0I S BAN E LANE �� g�' "� 156E 40
�� 13co
o LEIS FZ-11�� ,� 22 io T o (22190) .0 x
9
R=339 •35 105E 80f 7, 13 co rn a! O ,y sg
— — 136E 60 (13617) r\� o
(16710) N CO (11 54)
41 80.00 r, 156E 150E �p� 00 -8� :00
to 60
(14265) 13 0012 F 11 1 0�� 21 5 (1743( )
00 11'
W (16447) rn 00 000 '11346)
135E (14600) (10900) (12350) (15516) W (12000) tll
> 109E 131E 185E 150E 1 173E 120t',
80t 80f 80f 80f 80t 105E 123E 80t 80t 80t 80t
-H -H 105E
0 000 10800) (1 osoo)
°° (10800) 0 10800) (1 osoo) (1 osoo) (14600) W (16600) (10800) (10800)
135E (14175) (10800) (10800)
�, -H M 10
214. 15M16�17�18�19M 20�'�`� 6 `� 7 9
-OH4H
3 O
00 (10800) 00 60 1 123E 1 80t 1 80t 80f 80f
3 135E 60 105E 80t 80f 80t 80t 1 80t 105E
W
"°° W 78TH LANE ��
M- 4 -H O N
�iPO
P N (10800) f;Of SOf SOt 80f 105E 123E 80f 80f 80f 80t N G cc,
135E 60
105E 80t 60 �,� O w
O Cl
LLI Z -H _H6 -H
V) 5 -H -H -H +I +I � u� L0 Lo 'n a
U_ `n `10 -
(15863) (10800) (10800) (10800) (10800) (10800) (14600) (16600) (10800) (10800) (10800) (10800) Z
_ �I (14600) APPROXIMA E CENTER LI E OF UNITE POWER ASSOCIATION EASEMENT I�
LIJ
w J --
z 123E 80f 80f 80t 81f
w 135E 105E 80f 80f SOf 80f 80f 105E o - - - - _��— - - - - -
= o Q_� - - - - RX - - -
w
— — — — r — — �` c� — — — -H O
w 105E 803: 80f 80f 80f 80t 105E 0
0 135E f 135E
3
r (14600) (10800) (10800) (10800) (10800) (10800) (14000) -H
1 ' -H -H w
w (15525) 2— r7 .J r� "� "� `� 0 (11475) 0 o
~ 60 135E 0 w
0 135E `V z
w 60 105E 80f 80f 80t 80f 80t 105E o -'
z oo Nxi o w
2 OAK LANEID
-,�° `° ;�� 14
(1 osoo)
135E �� (15061) J
105.06 80t 80t 80t 105E 60- 70t �,�p 7`S2yc '
0 � � N 94f 13 � '
O o r o— o
(13009) � �, 3 4 3 H 6 7 U 60 12 '� ���� (15734)
( (10800) (10800)'- (10800) ^ _ (13586) h� 16514
oo a 155E
4 0 � 44f 80t 80f 80t 71 f (�.
o 204E 158E f 0�
0 CO^ 00
(,7 76, p) o� 2 00 , �, 11 ��
�11`100
5 00 �� (13736) 8 R_60.00 16706 'S
O r' 148E -H S2 5'L's ( ) o�
5 (20327)
(171522) N 6 r' 1 -H 1� Op 8 10
N� 00 0 n
-H (10923) 00 a)y 0)
I (12051) (12990) (12682)
PARK
(4.5 AC.f)
76t 193E 60f 130E 130± 187E 1 135E `V 495E
1307.49
60 I WEST
Li \ - - - - S. LINE OF THE SW1 /4 OF THE NE1 /4 OF SEC. 8
ly
Q
60
i
—tI
S T. in
02- 11'04 M9 i
Sl113DIVIDER: North Suburban Development, Inc
PO. Box 34004
Blaine, 111N 554.34
Phone 612-780-6343
SITE LOCATION: City of Lino Lakes
SW1/4 of NE1/4 of Sec. 8, `(. 31, R. 22
TOTAL AREA: 38.9 Acres
PROPOSED: e6 L.ots for single family homes.
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 10,300 sq. ft.
11INIMUM 6JIDTH: 80 feet (as measured along the front set -back
line)
I ! I I.I1 MU1,l DEP I-H : 135 FEET
[:, air;=3qf�- antJ Utility Easement shall be provided 10 feet in width
and adjoining street right-of-way lines. 5 feet in width and
ad ,oi.ning al l other lot 1 ines and as otherwise required.
(10800)DENOTESDENOTES APPROXIMATE i_OT AREA IIJ SQUARE FEET
Do-4 o i ?ee PaYaJro` 4 Ahov. Z9, 1990
SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 300
SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET
• DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND
O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE SET.
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM
I
CAINE & ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
17720 Highway 65 N.E. - Sodervlle, Minnesota 55304
434-7646
Jo b No. qo - 34 3
t