Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/29/2021 EB Packet CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 25, 2021 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Belland Farms and Associate Eye Care Partners Preliminary Plat& Site Plan Review 7. UPDATES A. Recycling Updates 8. ADJOURN CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE : August 25, 2021 TIME STARTED : 6:34 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:40 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : John Sullivan,Alex Schwartz, Shawn Holmes MEMBERS ABSENT : Ella McNulty, Cassondra Cavegn STAFF PRESENT : Andy Nelson, Phillip Davis I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mr. Sullivan called the Lino Lakes Environmental Board meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. on August 25, 2021. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Sullivan approved the Agenda as stated. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 28, 2021 Mrs. Holmes made a MOTION to approve the Minutes. Mr. Schwartz seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0. V. OPEN MIKE Mr. Sullivan declared Open Mike at 6:37 p.m. Open Mike declared closed at 6:37 p.m. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Lake Amelia Woods Mr. Nelson presented the staff report to the Environmental Board. The applicant, Thomas Budzynski,proposes to subdivide the existing property east of Amelia Lake at 6149 201h Avenue. The site is two parcels, and zoned RX (rural executive). The staff DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board August 25,2021 Page 2 report included a detailed description of the site's characteristics, including soils, significant resources, stormwater management and drinking water protection, wetlands, and a tree preservation plan among others. Staff recommended approval of the request with the following recommendations: 1. A survery for rare,unique, and significant resources should be performed. This survey should include a data request to the MN DNR for Natural Heritage Information System data for this site. The survey should also include information on presence and/or extent of any MN DNR listed threatened, endangered, or special concern species. If any of the aforementioned species are identified on the site, their locations should be mapped as this may impact future work on the lots (lake access locations, for example). 2. Buffers for wetlands and shore of Amelia Lake should be established in accordance with Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization(VLAWMO) recommendations. This may impact the placement of the house on lot 2. The driveway placement on lot 2 may require a variance to be obtained from the Planning and Zoning Board. 3. Tree protection fence appears to encroach on protected root zone areas on trees on all four lots. Trees that have more than 30 percent of their root zones impacted shall be counted as removed and must be mitigated for at applicable rates unless they are in basic use areas. 4. Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and Siberian elm(Ulmus pumila) appear on the list of trees intended to be saved. These trees should be removed if they are in the vicinity of other planned removals. Mitigation trees for removals of these species will not be required. 5. Red maple and sugar maple be removed from the suggested trees to replant with list on the Tree Mitigation Plan. 6. Stormwater basins are not part of the Basic Use Areas. Trees that are planned to be removed in these areas must be mitigated for at applicable rates. Mr. Schwartz inquired if this site was part the greenway system of Lino Lakes, and what would happen after a survey of rare and unique species was conducted. Mr. Nelson confirmed that the portions of the east shore of Lake Amelia is located within the greenway system. Mr. Nelson also noted that if endangered and/or threatened species were identified, it may impact how work is performed on the site. If special concern species were found, that should be communicated to homeowners as it may impact where they should establish lake accesses. Mrs. Holmes wanted to note that the tree removal is an area of concern. Having a large number of trees with only I I being designated to be mitigated for is alarming. Mr. Nelson noted that there may be more mitigation trees required for removals planned in the area of the stormwater basins as they are not considered part of the Basic Use Areas. DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board August 25,2021 Page 3 Mrs. Holmes noted that the Environmental Board does not hear what happens with the projects after they proceed to the next steps and that she would like to be provided with an update. Mr. Nelson responded that an update will be provided to the Board. Mr. Sullivan asked for clarification on the process, whether the project would come back to the Environmental Board, and if the Board was making a motion on the project. Mr. Nelson responded that the recommendations of the Environmental Board are forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board and ultimately to the City Council, who will make a decision on the project. Mr. Sullivan noted that usually the Board has a vote, but that it did not seem to be the case on this project. Mr. Nelson noted that the Board would not be voting to approve or deny the project, but would be making recommendations that are passed on to the Planning and Zoning Board, who also make recommendations which are passed on to the City Council. Mr. Sullivan recounted the history of the property near Lake Amelia and proposed uses for the lake property. He mentioned it is a DNR environmental lake, meaning that residents are not allowed to use the lake for recreational and boating purposes. Art Hawkins, who was a true environmental friend to Lino Lakes, worked with the DNR to restore the lake to its current condition. Protecting the lake as much as possible is very important. Mrs. Holmes noted there is one property that has access to the west side of the lake and uses it. Mr. Sullivan noted that having water showing up in the soil borings sounded like a problem. He also noted the importance of the buffers and minimizing use of chemicals in backyards. Mr. Sullivan also noted that he would like to the see the Stormwater Management Plan so he can make a recommendation on movement of water on the site and how it is being treated. He also noted it seemed unlikely that the Board would ever see a stormwater plan. He would also like to see VLAWMO reports and permits from BWSR,but noted the Board would have to believe these organizations are looking at the project and the project would not go forward without their approval. Mr. Sullivan mentioned the loss of trees, the potential need for a sound barrier, and that he would have liked to see the wetland report on wetland D. Mr. Schwartz stated he believes this project is particularly important, due to its inclusion in the greenway system, proximity to Lake Amelia, and Art Hawkin's efforts to restore DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board August 25,2021 Page 4 the lake. Recommendations should be made that preserve this area as much as possible, with special attention paid to wetland areas and areas that have species of special significance along the lake. He also noted that seeing the project only once with many of the reports not included or pending review by other agencies makes it difficult to make recommendations. Mr. Schwartz also noted having executive-style homes close to the interstate noise would make for difficult sales. Mr. Schwartz mentioned the rare,unique, and significance species survey would be the most important consideration. Mr. Nelson responded the DNR would be the authority involved if such species were found or impacted on site. Mr. Nelson responded to these concerns with a history of the previous plans for the Lake Amelia property. The property was going to be used for a large apartment building and senior center. The current project will have less impact than the ones that did not go forward, and many of the protections can be accomplished with a combination of wetland buffers and setbacks. Mr. Sullivan asked what future property owners would be doing with the lake access. Mr. Sullivan asked if the public had any comments they would like to make. The developer, Tom Budzynski, recounted some of the history of the site and the potential for about 300 units. He noted four houses on forty acres leaves the site wild and you would have to go up north to find lots with similar character. He also commented use of the lake would be low intensity, such as fishing and canoeing. The lake is shallow enough that putting in larger motorized boats would probably not be feasible. Mr. Schwartz asked if the trees as seen from the road would be impacted. Mr. Budzynski mentioned they want to preserve as many trees as possible. The engineer, Kent Brander, mentioned the stormwater treatment on the site, including the basins, is high level treatment and better than you would typically see on similar sites. Members of the Environmental Board discussed adding two additional recommendations: 7. Motorized boats should not be allowed on Lake Amelia. 8. The Environmental Board makes all recommendations assuming that all studies conducted by government agencies come back with positive results. Mrs. Holmes MOTIONED to approve the staff recommendations and additional Environmental Board recommendations. Mr. Schwartz seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0. DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board August 25,2021 Page 5 VII. UPDATES A. General Updates Mr. Davis provided an update on Anoka County's Solid Waste Abatement Advisory Team meeting on August 25, 2021. The next meeting will be held on October 27, 2021. He discussed the Recycling Ambassador program conducted by Anoka County and provided the Environmental Board with information on how the program works and how to sign up. Mr. Davis and Mr. Nelson have completed The Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment(SCORE) Report for the months of January to June 2021 and will be hearing back from the County some time during or after October 2021. Mr. Sullivan inquired about the City's progress on the County's recycling goals. The City was at roughly 86% of the I"half of 2021 tonnage goal, but staff expects these numbers to increase with addition of organics bins and weekly parks recycling pick up. Mr. Sullivan inquired about the City's efforts to improve business recycling outreach. Mr. Davis responded that he sent the County a list of all businesses within the Lino Lakes, and the County will be sending outreach postcards to all addresses on the list. Mr. Nelson stated this is the extent of the work staff can do towards business recycling, as the SCORE reimbursement funds are to be used for residential recycling programs and the city would not be compensated for efforts on business recycling. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Schwartz made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Motion was supported by Mrs. Holmes. Motion carried 3-0. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: September 29th, 2021 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Belland Farms and Site Plan Review for Associate Eye Care Partners APPLICANT: Rehbein Properties Attn: Matt Rehbein 7625 24th Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 DRF Lino Eye Building, LLC Attn: Ross Hedlund 7101 West 78th Street Minneapolis, MN 55439 OWNER: Rehbein Properties Attn: Matt Rehbein 7625 24th Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval for a Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review. The preliminary plat will involve subdivision of the approximately 18 acre parcel into two platted lots, two outlots, a stormwater pond, and one new road. The site plan review is for a proposed medical office building offering eye care services. Per the applicant's narrative, the 12,230 square foot building will be placed on a 1.72 acre lot. This staff report is based on review of the following submittals: oo Belland Farms Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain, dated 9-13-21. 1 oo Associated Eye Care Partners Eye Clinic Building Site Improvement Plans prepared by Carlson McCain, dated 9-17-21. oo Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated 9-13-21. oo Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec, dated 9-01-21. oo Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc., dated 9-13-21. ANALYSIS General Site Characteristics Rehbein Properties owns the 17.69 acre site, which is predominantly agricultural fields and five wetland areas that are 3.9 acres in total. The proposed plan involves subdivision of the property into two lots: a medical office building that would be constructed first, and a daycare building to be constructed at a later date on the second lot. These sites would be served by a new road that would connect to other properties west. A stormwater basin would manage additional runoff due to the created impervious surface. A larger outlot (B) would be reserved for future development. Land Cover Pre-settlement land cover (Marschner) was Big Woods, which included oaks, maples, basswood, and hickory. Current land cover (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System) on the site includes cropland with upland soils over most the majority of the site; mixed emergent marsh, cattail marsh, and seasonally flooded altered/non-native dominated emergent vegetation in the northwest; seasonally flooded emergent vegetation in the southwest; and 26-50% impervious cover with deciduous trees in the south-central portion of the site. Rare,Unique, or Significant Resources Kjolhaug Environmental Services did submit a Natural Heritage Information System request to the MN DNR. This review identified Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) within a one-mile radius of the site. The DNR pamphlet on this turtle must be provided to all contractors working on the site. Soils The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 915 to 921 ft. Per the Geotechnical Evaluation Report, eight soil borings were performed, ranging in depth from 15 to 20 feet below grade. Borings encountered topsoil from 0.5 to 1.5 feet. 2 These borings are used to determine excavation depths for the portions of the site that will have buildings, pavement, or utilities added. The excavations remove vegetation, topsoil, organic soils, soft clays and other unsuitable soils to prepare for soil corrections that will be suitable for construction. All borings encountered primarily clayey sand and sandy lean clay. Groundwater was encountered in three soil borings at depths of 4-7 feet. The soil types on site include: Cathro muck(A/D) in the northwest, which is hydric, and very poorly drained. Hayden fine sandy loam (B) in the north central, non-hydric, and well drained. Webster loam and Dundas loam in the south, hydric, and poorly drained. Stormwater Management A stormwater management plan has been submitted and will receive a full review by the Engineering Department. The following summary review is based upon the same stormwater management plan. Existing Conditions All stormwater on the site drains to a culvert located in the southeast corner of the site or to a wetland in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland in the southwest overflows to the culvert located in the southeast corner. Ultimately, all runoff from the site enters Clearwater Creek, which is an impaired water. Proposed Conditions Lot 1 Total Area: 76,808 sq. ft. Impervious surface area: 45,556 sq. ft. (59%) Lot 2 Total Area: 86,899 sq. ft. Impervious surface area: 44,825 sq. ft. (52%) Outlot A Total Area: 20,223 sq. ft. Outlot B Total Area: 558,948 sq. ft. The plan includes one wet sedimentation basin that will manage the additional stormwater created by the increased impervious surface. This will be a sedimentation pond, as stormwater infiltration was not deemed feasible for this site due to the prevalence of clay soils throughout the site. 3 Stormwater that doesn't flow to the basin will flow to the culvert at the southeast corner of the site, as will overflow from the basin itself. Groundwater was not detected in the boring that occurred in the vicinity of the proposed stormwater pond. Stormwater runoff for the proposed site conditions will match or will decrease from the existing conditions on the site for the 2-, 10-, and 100- year storm events. Also, the pond has been designed to provide a volume equal to 2.5 inches of runoff from the drainage area of the pond,per Rice Creek Watershed District rules. Stormwater Pollution Prevention The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) notes the locations of several Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be installed on the site to minimize erosion and sediment leaving the site. These BMPs include a rock construction entrance, silt fence (including redundant silt fence in the proximity of the wetland to the west), inlet protections, concrete washout area, and riprap for energy dissipation at pipe outfalls. There should be additional inlet protections noted in the SWPPP for any catch basins or inlets where 24th Avenue and Main Street border the property. Being that this site will drain to impaired waters, Clearwater Creek and Peltier Lake, stabilization of exposed soil areas must occur within 7 days after the construction activity in that area permanently ceases. This is already noted in the applicant's SWPPP. Flood Plain Site does not fall within the flood management zone. Shoreland District Site does not fall within Shoreland District. Wetlands Per the Wetland Permit Application, there were five wetlands that are approximately 3.9 acres combined delineated on the site. The proposed project involves impact to wetland 3 (0.7381 acre), which will be filled. The wetland is annually farmed, severely degraded, and has low vegetative diversity. This fill will be mitigated through the purchase of wetland credits at a 1:1 ratio, per RCWD rules. Credits will be purchased from the City of Blaine Wetland Bank#1664. The other wetlands are not within the RCWD wetland management corridor, so WMC buffers will not be required. A 10-foot buffer will be required to meet city standards. 4 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Considerations The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identified this site as commercial in all 3 land use scenarios. No further environmental assessment is required. Drinking Water Protection The site is within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) and is moderately vulnerable. The site will be connected to City water and sewer. LANDSCAPE PLAN Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat,biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. SUMMARY No.of Trees Trees Located within Basic Use Area(Non ESA-nu mitigation required) 26 Trees Not Located within Basic Use Area(Non ESA,6-12"DBH) 13 Trees NotLocatedwithin Basic Use Area(Non ESA,12"+DBR) 7 Ton ITrees 46 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS Replacement Ratto Nu.of Trees Trees toot Located within Basic Use Area(Non ESA,&12"DBH) 1.1 13 Trees Not located within Basic Use Area(Non ESA, 12"4 Dn 2:1 14 Total Tree Replacement 27 The plan calls for removal of 46 trees, most of which are in the southern portion of lot 2. 26 removals are in Basic Use Areas, in non-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. These will not require mitigation. There are 20 trees not located in Basic Use Areas, and not in Environmentally Sensitive Areas. These trees will require mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for removals of trees 6-12" Diameter at Breast Height(DBH), or 2:1 ratio for trees greater than 12"DBH. Undesirable species do not have to be mitigated for. Removals of a 22" and 8" ash will not require mitigation trees to be planted. The total number of replacement trees required is 24. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. 5 The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree= 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs 31,252 sq. ft. of open space calls for 16 large trees and 47 large shrubs. The plan has 22 large tree or large tree equivalents near open space that would meet open space standards. The shrubs on site are associated with foundation and buffer and screen standards. The 13 large shrubs associated with the accent for the entrance sign should count towards open space standards. There will be 34 more shrubs required that should be planted in open space. Specifically, these shrubs should be placed around the stormwater basin, along the turf area on the building's east perimeter, or the stormwater runoff area in the south of the building. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. Buffers and screens as planned meet the requirements. Canopy Cover The purpose of this requirement is to mitigate the effects of vehicular hardscape by establishing tree canopy cover to intercept rainfall,protect pavement from sun deterioration, reduce the heat island effect, and improve aesthetics. Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Vehicular hardscape planned: 27,227 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 10,891 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 9,350 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. The 3 large trees near the future parking lot just west of the stormwater basin would add 1,800 sq. ft. of canopy cover if they were moved closer to the parking lot access road. Alternatively, if the future parking lot stalls were added, the vehicular hardscape and canopy cover totals must be recalculated. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 6 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree= 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs For 480 linear feet of applicable foundation, 10 large trees and 29 large shrubs (or acceptable substitutes) are required for the north, east, and south building faces. The plans indicate: 4 large trees 11 medium trees 8 large shrubs 116 medium shrubs These substitutions are equivalent to: 11 large trees 85 large shrubs The foundation landscape requirements have been met. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The area around the stormwater basin will be seeded with MN DOT 34-271 wet meadow seed mix, with 35-241 mesic prairie seed mix at higher elevations extending south along the eastern perimeter. Sod is proposed for the rest of the site. A native seed mix should be used for the low runoff area in the southeast corner of the site in lieu of sod. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Belland Farms Preliminary Plat and Associated Eye Care Partners Site Plan Review be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following comments and any additional comments from the Environmental Board: 1. Additional (5) inlet protections must be added on Main Street along the southern border of the property to catch tracked sediment. 7 2. Undesirable tree species do not have to be mitigated for. Removals of a 22" and 8" ash will not require mitigation trees to be planted. The total number of replacement trees required is 24. This should be updated on the Tree Preservation Plan. 3. Canopy cover standards have not been met. The three trees on the western edge of the stormwater basin can be moved closer to the hardscape, or the parking stalls can be added, which would require recalculation of the hardscape and canopy cover totals. 4. 34 more shrubs will be required to meet open space standards. 5. White pine (Pinus strobus) should be switched for a species with better pollution tolerance. 6. Native seed mix should be used for the southeast corner of the site in the low runoff area connecting to the culvert. ATTACHMENTS 1. Belland Farms Preliminary Plat Title Sheet 2. Belland Farms Prelimary Plat (3/11) 3. Existing Drainage Conditions (pg. 10/80 of Stormwater Management Plan) 4. Proposed Drainage Conditions (pg. 11/80 of Stormwater Management Plan) 5. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 6. Wetlands-Existing Conditions (pg. 14/51 of the Wetland Permit Application) 7. AECP Landscape Plan Sheets 1, 2, and 3 8 J Q Z o W 0 IV U W ZQ Z Z BELLAND FARMS Z W DC f U UG>C > w f Z � Z Z Z W N1 W J N C; m � z I lei O AK S I lei lei SO A W as VICINITY MAP Z NLn W a Z1 co LL- \ - Q I ��SE�p,_. HFgGfip�� X R G w Q w I MPRFss war nr." �tia griNo j � / a - O Z co 731ZD ST L W It L i ° 9 a 2 Q ' a f°a HLTGO 3 CCO J - to H ainV -- S ..p _ �)° a D o nevievrCern { v o 0 - 149TH STN 1 , �-' z o _ z w co H, is �- terville o a q o , i O p -v law S, �14 d � J W LL - 7L -4 J W = m J I I \\ \\ SHEET INDEX \ \ \ 1. COVER 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS \\ \\ III 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT \ \ \ p 4. RESOURCE INVENTORY PLAN 5. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN \ \ \\ 0 6. PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE, & \ \ EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN \ \ 8. DETAILS W _ \ \ 9. NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PLAN \\ \\ 10. GHOST PLAT z \ \ \ TP1. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN W cLn o \\ I Q > \ \ \\ Q z Z N o ReSEMA Y--WA� LU- L , W N ,�-- -- -- -- --� 1 m 2 U l N Z W % .� % `% 'a Q I 1 •( l \ \ 'j -� i I II p A W REVISIONS 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS \ 0 40 80 160 O \ \ I I IW -q `4 \ (IN FEET) I = IQ PROPOSED \ I \ I = DRAWN BY: JTR 01 \ \ DESIGNED BY: JTR DAYCARE PROPOSED BENCHMARKS - BUILDING \ MEDICAL N ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 \\ \V BUILDING 1. MNDOT STATION NAMED 0282 S. ELEVATION = 931.461 (NAVD 88) I hereby certify that this plan, specification r or report was prepared by me or under my o \ 1 \ \ 1 1 I direct supervision and that I am a duly `- '/ \ \ 0 Licensed Professional Engineer under the L r j laws of the State of Minnesota CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. --- -- -- - - _--_--- -----_ --------- --_-- _-_- _---- ---------- - — =_-=-a-=--a--_--a-=-a- — — .� signature: e: —1 ' 10 ------------- = ------ ----- _ — _ ---------------- Date: 09/13/21 License #: 45889♦ I STREET 9234sg _ Know what's below. of all before you dig. 10 v 0 W U W C W = o� z� � LL � Q PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPER SITE ADDRESS W .-I GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) 0M ( J U U O ~ Q1N A U) 0 O tz J PIN No.24-31-22-11-0010 PIN No.24-31-22-11-0011 Z o a Owner:CM PROPERTIES 14 LLC Owner: CM PROPERTIES 14 LLC R E H B E I N PROPERTIES 2373 MAIN STREET z a W = O'a M o Address: NA Address: NA C GRAPHIC SCALE � � V J = U � 2 ~ BELLANDm I- O W W N 7625 24TH AVENUE N. LINO LAKES, MN 55038 50 0 25 50 100 A 0mo � = � Zw I � a > W = LLO = LL UG M 5038 oC 0 1 F O Z F. O t�0 1 n 1 1 i -1- r - r- -1- i I 1 i r.� r r- i 1 r n r r 1 -1- 1 i I WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF I- wCa a s I o i I\/I / \ I I I I H< H- I f l I H�'ir.� - / I\I I / I I I I I I I I I I I NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST - /�y� _ p, - I `i Na = I I I-\ 1 1 v �i 1 1 \ - L- ,.i,.......•••�/ I i �i i 1 "•L......�./..........t_ I v Li I-\ Li Li I 1 1 11...,..y......• .......� QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 �\ 1 INC — 50 FEET A / 01 NLQ CN ..... Q f N 911.58 d� 910.70 \\ 7�� i' /ram/ m f 1Y o��•�'�4"W.......1219.57 FND-REBAR •..' S d9�ND-REBAR-40361 �. . .. 00 W CO wi > In / LOT AREAS: --- z z o N / / // -----Z- ---.147.00 - - r- I C. = 0 / / i-� O C^0 0) / S / w J WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY j/ \?� Sd // J w Total existing parcel area = 811,353 sq. ft. 11 112 j 0 a KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL / dS/ / w Y % ; / U0 Z I 1 r �> I a a G / ;'d'J Sd o w w U) Proposed Lot 1 », 3 z W <�1 » I �I•. �ltl� i a // /S // mod¢ W i d9� N N Ln Total area = 76,808 sq. ft. Z a WET LAND AS.DELINEATED B(.•' sd� /! LL z Impervious surface area = 45,556 sq. ft. (59%) I a a - 0 �, r, ' M KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL' / / O = �� � I � w = N WETLAND 2 y : � // � sdO S / // M�N J ��_ I , Proposed Lot 2 J w t0 °� T / / sd� / ;'/ / 'm < I Total area = 86,899 sq. ft. = Z .� X � I j Z � o .`/ �' � S /� Z =� � W W a Z Il� � % /i / 1111� � 1L� a O¢ Impervious surface area = 44,825 sq. ft. (52%) a = �I _ 3 WETLAND 5 dO �/ / � / �- m Proposed Outlot A °� I 1 '' I W = ° o I 1 y ti Total area = 20,223 sq. ft. IL Jul �1_ WETLAND 1 ice\ O Lu Z7 � r :' �� .......... CY Proposed Outlot B __ o:f - I Total area = 558,948 sq. ft. _ c I_ = I .......... / s�c� goy o •N0fl°0'0'00"E 462.09 Upland area = 419,785 sq. ft. (excluding wetland) a 3JU 61 - - - - - - - - - - - G0-PG0•eo��402 09— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60.00 / 1�Y O = � I ,�QE JME Proposed dedicated 24th Avenue W O aQopc Total area = 40,754 sq. ft. F_ Z a o I ................"•••'•"""' /� ' Proposed street Total area = 27,721 sq. ft. _J _ - \ LOT 2 Qwoe C-11-�c��/ SdO / - MM =I= \ NN 86,899 S.F. W ��5 yP�P� / I /�d� Sd9 / / / cb °~ - a a ' (1.99 ACRES) / / r .'�..\ = W`� _i_ 00H WLL1 O .I : W a } U 0 y // Sd� / l-a WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY :'Z Z N .>_ o a O Z I �'�� 'ryl KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL 1 a o o I ..................... `y'^ U. BENCHMARK ' rr^� W o + CON Z ID oo PROPOSED d� O O M NDOT BM: 0282 S v J X ILU } F O In CO DAYCARE // y� Sd9 �3M �I Z W w DATUM: NAVD88 LU L I W W Z F °� M BUILDINGS I ._. Z a a O J 0 N FFE=923.0 / Sd� / ti aZ / d c . 1 O' o: a ELEVATION: 931.461 Z I , : w O / s / / OUTLOT 3M�13M ~ ` Q WET T ---:-- -----94.0---------------- / / / Co Q 558, 48 S.F. Z w w / d // / / (12.83..ACRES) cif •c Sd / - 00 1 �j LEGEND I --- » I �Mo fA� sd� \ � x o J / / , ... o -- Z rn d� / / ..' 00 I i qst 00 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED r s i / o _ 1 � I / 9 O h DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 N Y A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL a, W 11 - - - ti oo' 26o- 6 DENOTES SET PKNAIL 3 I '•. - - -�'�} i- �� - �!- - - - - - - o /. / .00 DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL _ 147.00 - / 0 \�y ------- 1 X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION .� Z eNol i2( ='�" PROPOSED DRAINAGE y� ` i° M .. / -----�__ - z WETLAND 4.. �o F DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX u� ' "'� / AND UTILITY EASEMENT ALA `�� 9 DENOTES GUY WIRE 3 - 1� rn / 1 ,', I /cAr6 WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY DENOTES HYDRANT "' w sd� 68 / KJOLHAUG EN ONMENTAL \ 1.' VIR :V 3:, - i DENOTES POWER POLE z - : �;� l �, , / WETLAND 3 99 DENOTES SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTION NO. O ~ I _ 1 I ... I ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN dz \' d9 / -----t-=------s 7 i '. ..� - 7. ----- ------- - OUTLOT A 1 ' ,\ ... .. > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I < Z i - -'---- `-----67.6- 91 a O ;,� y F 20,223 S.F. 6.• DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN w U :o I I N a LOT 1 ) KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTALDBY w 6 (0.46 ACRES / a r ^ d W ' Z IL 0 ^ 76,808 S.F.. m E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Coo :*i O I : w 0 z ,.I z w w 0+ ao a O >• • z o 1.76 A CR•ES '" x, �>( ^. ^ GEL I VCW1 a V [.. �' I c I oo N O O a a 0 a O ( ) / Z�P� ........... '��)1 •, DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINE o V I X 01 3 Z a 3 3 , M > W o wi I I M o LU LL �co v PROPOSED ` aP� n� �• FIBER DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE `/' o J i N ^n g o o In o0 0 z ry I o W Z o In 00 MEDICAL o5 •.., O a � o+ I `�I � °' Z Ina = o+ o+ / r Q ��� GAS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE " > 11 \ BUILDING o J ti CO .., = 6. ~ li � \ a 0 O �1 FFE=922.5 13M .Q��O y' °' ,9 918.... ....................... U a H Z ~Q I\ W W " Z P t, - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ono > fir?' - -\_ a o > Z z hZ•I 920.97 Z>> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER � ., FNDALUMMO - � w OHU DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY Y 1 Q M wog — .......... DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE --__» __� MFjeF� �� M PROPOSED DRAINAGE o 11 -� --PROPOSED DRAINAGE r FI WET AND UTILITY EASEMENT M / DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE 11 I AND UTILITY EASEMENT "' •9 W WET WET y 25 -_ ----- =Q 62.57 J8 3S—IyyET�WET 110.37 7631.15 . y - DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE w ��,E, 1 !. 3nn. .......- --13M:::::::::::::..........13N1....... 13M 13M 1 r V J • ---•- -_..... .t. PIN No. 17 119 22 14 0008 1 w�.::.. � ............. ...................................916.............. 91 .............. DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL M •920• .. .. .. fIeER g2�............�BeR................ .. F. E .... .... . ....��.. ER— LII�FR_IlturR, — — ——: eE4 r FIDE-: — �heE�.....................F�seR....................Fi � eEr FIDE-, Owner:City of X I L w M i` 915.60 — �-�• Address: Unassigned OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA -I� I�—II �. RCPTOP M 1 COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) �h6 L vz FND P4 v 'S0004"38�� 1238'27 00/ I p w DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: �0 9 L w Z917, i p9 91aa9 34 / S�J/ 914.11 �— 93 / — — — — — � RCPTOP / 921. ��/ g EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 0 0 O ANOKA COUNTY/ CITY LIMITS NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION / Cl / - - - - - - - - - � QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST 1 2 cn O QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 +-5 B L OI I�i K 1 Sys; O - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 05/21/21, 06/14/21, and 06/24/21. Parcel 1: �N Ij9 2 0 5-t I o 9 �2� LAND USE DESIGNATION - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Parcel 7A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka I hereby certify that this survey, plan - - - I I / - - - + � - - - /I County, Minnesota. or report was prepared by me or under I �l / 2040 Land use is Commercial. Parcel ID Numbers: 24-31-22-11-0005 and 24-31-22-11-0004. my direct supervision and that I am a BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT Parcel 2: duly Registered Land Surveyor under LINES, BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. the laws of the State of Minnesota. RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND REAR LOT LINES UNLESS The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section11 OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. - This survey was prepared with the benefit of title work. Commitment for title insurance prepared by Land Title, 24, Township 31, Range 21, except that part described as follows: ZONING: Inc., as Issuing Agent for First American Title Insurance Company, Issuing Office File No. 638209, dated effective May 12, 2021 at 7:00 A.M., was used to supplement this survey. Commencing at the Southwest corner of said East 1/2; thence East ASON E. D a9 along the South line thereof 200 feet to the point of beginning; thence Existing zoning is GB - General Business. - Wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental. continuing East along said South line 180 feet; thence North parallel Date: 09-17-2021 License No. 41578 R110 SONwith the West line of said East 1/2 208 feet; thence West parallel with Setbacks: - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% the South line 180 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 208 DRAWN BY: BCD JOB NO: 210639BT DATE: 09/09/21 EST.1911 Building Parking annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270015 Panel No. 0370 feet to the point of beginning, CHECK BY: JER FIELD CREW: DT/CT Professional Land Surveyors From streets 30 (40*) 15 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. 6776 Lake Drive N E Suite 110 Rear yard 30 (5**) 10 EXCEPT 1 09-17-21 CITY COMMENTS BCD www.egrud.com Side yard 10 10 - Underground utilities are shown per markings requested by E.G. Rud and Sons per Gopher State One Call Ticket 2 Lino Lakes MN 55014 No.'s 211744451 and 211744453. Parcel Nos. 6 and 6A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, 3 7 * From collector or arterial street Anoka County, Minnesota. 4 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 ** Accessory building - Proposed improvements, ponding, and utilities provided by Carlson McCain. 5 S:\RUD\CAD\21PROJ\210639BT\PRELIMINARY PLAT\210639BT- PRELIM.PLAT.DWG SHEET 3 a ' \_914 l III I 1 I I 1 I I _ r ( VI _/-912'— \ � \ 91 � ♦ II'a -- �v �� I ( � ♦ � III II � I Ito II I \ \ I I " l 1.0 V V�\ `v ♦ III; 1 Y I �II II ,I I j \\ is ♦ \\ \ \ V ` \ l) i \ N i \9� w'0 So so go \ I 0 60 120 240 91S.60 �I 1 1 Zp ♦ ` �� V ` 914.11 1 ,� ♦ I \\ \\ RCPTOP �> I,RCPTOP ♦ \ s \ I I ' I I LEGEND 1 \ 0 ■■■■■••■ CATCHMENT LINE i s 1S —9221 11 --==------- — �_- y I, I �1L c�, _ _ - ------ -- -------- - --------------------CATCHMENT --------- INV-S-E-W.91].64 MAN STREET INV-S-E-W:915.9 918 --- --- ----- ------- -- I ru -T--------- --N-------- INV-N:916.00______' IN— 915.09- �p COLLECTION POINT 92sAx= --- A - Notes: 0 Notes: REHBEIN PROPERTIES FIGURE 2 CARLSON BELLAND FARMS 0 7625 24th Avenue N Lino Lakes Minnesota EXISTING CONDITIONS M�CAI N Hugo, MN 55038 DRAINAGE MAP 1;, 0. I \ \ I I -914 1 I .00 \ \ • 1 I I loo ��♦ 111 v s v A ♦♦, • III ♦„�• \ � I ` , - \ 30S 9I8 .•Ir � v III l� •����r•• \ � �\� �18 ♦• I \ \ II i :�.\. .\.\... .......... G- �20 4+9 .8�\ � +OQ——�——— 3+00 1+0 NXI STREET A % \X lop N �9110 �a �� v / v "� � ------- 20S is loS >I I1Ieor5W2iolNG \ EEE Eo we 9 •'�w"°�s° 0 60 120 240 1 \ j �o otc 91 914.11 MCP RCPTOP 1 2P� r LEGEND _ ---9918'=- ' c 922 ■EEMEME■ CATCHMENT LINE — ,. —°„° --- --_- ----____ _- ------- -------- - ----- ----------------- _ - -- �---------__--_- -'== r-� -N- ----------- -- _-- 40P _ -- 1 S CATCHMENT __________=== -- - --- wo. -'-------------------_' ; z - \�1 r- -` eaia.s MAN STRUT ��--INV—S—E—W:915.9 b — \ � �— —` INv � INV—S—E—W:91 J.64—�� � --- -- ` INV—N:916.00--- — INV—N:915.09— P COLLECTION POINT gz3' j 0 Notes: REHBEIN PROPERTIES FIGURE 3 CARLSON BELLAND FARMS 0 7625 24th Avenue N Lino Lakes Minnesota PROPOSED CONDITIONS M�CAI N Hugo, MN 55038 DRAINAGE MAP I- I Y l m r. �•� �r �r} 05 __ cl —,--- + ' LIr i b � C t� � I 'J C :: —'1-::�::::: w_rr... .c:..,-:::.;,.�.: '•'tom* - — - C7 0,4 .-L._ N r�= My J -- . a _ �_ a U1 O DS2 - m 4 311-s2 N -13 ■ r ■ 918 Wetland 1A tl 0.085-ac 04 CN 910 Wetland 1 04 4. I;pj (7) - 2.47-ac Wetland 4 0.08-ac I 4 1 I 1 Wetland 5 0.05-ac • Wetland3 0:74-a c r 1 f •1 Wetland 2 Parcel Boundary Project Limits 922 918 - - Wetland Boundary 2. - f Anoka County Lidar Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2019 FSA Photo) N 0 200 Belland Farms (KES 2021-162) I I Lino Lakes,Minnesota Feet Note:Boundaries indicated KT u A T Th on this figure are approximate j11 .n1-iuG Ii F.NVJRONMENTA1.SERVICES COMPAI\`Y and do not constitute an �wR official survey product. ►rrY Source:MNGEO Spatial Commons CITY OF LINO LAKES LANDSCAPE STANDARDS I % \ \G \ co 1. CANOPY COVER. THE REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL USES IS 40%. Z Z f MINIMUM CANOPY COVER REQUIRED = 10,891 SF (27,227 SF VEHICULAR AREA x 40%) w Z \ \ I o MINIMUM CANOPY COVER PROVIDED = 10,900 SF W - Z LARGE TREES - INTERIOR PARKING ISLANDS (100%) WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50 73 OTC ui f 1,900 SF (2 TREES x 950 SF) 8,400 SF (14 TREES x 600 SF) Z N W ' J O \ 9 \ 0 7'-12' FROM PARKING (25%) m 600 SF (2 TREES x 300 SF) o Q \ v O^ U � 2 2. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM TWO (2) LARGE TREES WITHIN 30 FT OF BUILDING AND SIX (6) or i S \ \ LARGE SHRUBS WITHIN 15 FT OF BUILDING PER 100 LF BUILDING PERIMETER. O ' \ \ \ \ Lh rn FOUNDATION TREES REQUIRED = 10 (480 LF BUILDING PERIMTER) ■ ni I"t FOUNDATION TREES PROVIDED = 10 (4 LRG. TREES + 1 MED. TREE + 11 SM. TREES) Z ao , w � � Mill 4% ?: p � — — 6 91 i� FOUNDATION SHRUBS REQUIRED = 29 (480 LF BUILDING PERIMETER) \ \ / \ \ ` 920 920 920 oil FOUNDATION SHRUBS PROVIDED = 85 (8 LRG. SHRUBS + 116 MED. SHRUBS) w X ° \ v 3. OPEN AREAS LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM ONE (1) LARGE TREE AND THREE (3) LARGE SHRUBS PER p IL 2000 SF OF OPEN SPACE. a �' \ \G \ 9 \ _ v mil OPEN AREA TREES REQUIRED = 16 (31,252 SF OPEN AREA / 2000) Z / �� WF - OPEN AREA TREES PROVIDED = 27 (21 LRG. TREES + 4 MED. TREES + 9 SM. TREES) y of \ 9 \ Q co \ \ \G ROSEMARY WAY 920 R S E M A R Y 7MY °' OPEN AREA SHRUBS REQUIRED = 47 (31,252 SF OPEN AREA / 2000 x 3) a • a SEE SHEET L2 //rrrr,/rrrr /rrrr,/ rrr,rrr // ,/ / r ///rr r // / / /,rrrr /, rr mil OPEN AREA SHRUBS PROVIDED = 120 (8 LRG. SHRUBS + 145 MED. SHRUBS + 17 SM. SHRUBS) O / / /V/ / / 4. BUFFER AND SCREEN. YEAR ROUND CONTINOUS SCREENING IS REQUIRED BETWEEN A PARKING LOT M OD H /// / / / r/r // AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR SIDEWALK - 30 IN HEIGHT. ALL CONTINUOUS YEAR ROUND '1 �C �7 /m��T77/ �T/T�/erg/77'�/_' �- /��/��/ �� / / // i� PLANTING SCREENS SHALL REQUIRE AT A MINIMUM A DOUBLE ROW OF PLANTS WITH TRIANGULATED . /rr / rrrr / /�// - —V A V A 0 0 o r //rrr /rrrr/ rrrr/rrrr 920r� r/�/r r r r r r/rrrr rrr/// r r r r r / SPACING. SMALL SHRUBS SHALL BE A PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 3' ON CENTER; - -� 929� F1O V �- - o o / / / 818 // / ///, / / // / / / MEDIUM SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 4' ON CENTER; AND LARGE IIIIII � '/ // / / /�� SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 6' ON CENTER. �\\\\ o0 \IIALI s: s1s Mph // 0 / / / / I/ Vi G 5. TREE PRESERVATION. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. 914 / / ��� REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED (TOTAL - LOTS 1 & 2) 27 TREES 912 / // / / / / / / / REPLACEMENT TREES PROVIDED (LOT 1 AND OUTLOT A) 24 TREES W \ \ \ 9 RM *REMAINING REPLACEMENT TREES TO BE PROVIDED ON LOT 2 WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ' 910 /rr / rrl/ \ \ \ I \ \ \ 1 STORM WATER A IRRIGATION REQ UIRED BL 90s POND �/ / / / / / / / / / Z ro FUTURES o/�/ r r ,ap� o� r r/ VI \ \ 6 PARKING (BY OTHERS) °j/ rrr ,� ,o� r /I/ � ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED, PLANTED, OR OTHERWISE LANDSCAPED SHALL BE FULLY Q \ 920 `fl \ r\ °, N 9u, �' h / / / / / / IRRIGATED. REFER TO LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. J a Z sos-0_1 ; / 910— W � Q a� \ \ c \ �9� s�4 , ; , ; ; ; a Q c 0 \ \ /// / / / REINFORCED SPILLWAY Q (� V / rrrr / rrrr // / / / / (BY OTHERS) Uj rrr / / Vl \ \ 918 (B W N u.i V \ A \ 2 III 1'�\I11111111111 . . . J iD v v IIIII R IIII-o / / / LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES Fk \ BF I I I I I � I�I ; ;;�;2 \I -I r r r 6,/ 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ~ IIII IIII BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION START. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND THAT AFFECT THE V W WORK SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR O CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR APPROVING ANY ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED. 8 \ III II 11 77 2. UTILITY LOCATES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND Q \ \ \G III VERIFYING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, AT Q 922 Lu\ / / // LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW. IN jl j , MINNESOTA, CALL GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD O \ \ \ A Q I LOCATION OF PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. ALL LOCATES AND ITEMS NOTE \_922 \ G \ SEE SHEET L2 / / / //' AS 'FIELD VERIFY' ON THE PLANS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT s?2 9 r \ ( /� / / / i THEIR EXPENSE. V 3. PERMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE OWNER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT J THAT THE REQUIRED PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL J o \ o o IIII\ IIIIII '�/ i i (v APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. (A OD T✓ 'j I 4. EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING Z M -- \ O ° + I ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, SITE AMENITIES, ETC. o °o ° ° o IIIIII / / /o THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALLLn Q \ _ / / BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY DAMAGE (AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE) TO N \ o o // i III EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. J �, � III d M z \_ti / r r/ 5. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND ACCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SITE ACCESS WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE m 4-1 9 ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE CO FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE N SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. W O \ — PROPOSED MEDICAL I G r r r LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE > 01 �( BUILDING I PERMITTED. ALL WASTE AND/OR UNUSED MATERIAL SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED W o FROM THE SITE. E ,--I 6. SITE REMOVALS. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR GENERAL SITE REMOVALS. ALL ITEMS O O ' \ x, \ * \\ \ Ij j / / /V i I NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND Z O \ SB _ ° d IMMEDIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, FBI m \ 6 o ' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE WITH OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR J F.\ \ LL ANY ITEMS NOTED AS 'REMOVED BY OTHERS' OR 'REMOVE AND SALVAGE.' / o 7. UTILITY COORDINATION. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO PROPOSED UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS FOR SITE IIII �` -�S >�--��--> ELECTRICAL WORK AND SITE LIGHTING. II � G �° III 8. CONSTRUCTION STAKING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE oqo RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING CONTROL POINTS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION FIELD \ ° IIIIII / / / STAKING DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. REVISIONS 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS 9. DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO oo° o°o° °o° °o° °o° °o° °o° °o° o°oo° FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT/WALKWAY, OR OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IF NMI RM \ JL 10. PLAN QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL I g III FM MATERIAL QUANTITIES PER PLAN. MATERIAL SCHEDULES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY FOR �� \ III CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. 922 922 I G � � � � \ I II I II I II I 920 � DRAWN BY: RJR CA 11. REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN THIS 920 s g18 DESIGNED BY: RJR v / o 3 PROJECT ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING ORDER: ' o O o0 00 0o O o O oo O o O oo O 1. ADDENDA, WITH THOSE OF A LATER DATE HAVING PRECEDENCE OVER ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 m I - �- i THOSE OF AN EARLIER DATE. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I - � h 2. LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. I I I I I I I I / rrr / 3. PLAN DRAWINGS. ;�� v - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 _ 4. PLANT / MATERIAL SCHEDULES. I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification _ _ _ _ - _ — _ �fo� �fo� - - a ° 0 � �,I '- \ III { \ IIIII V � � �a / / / n�� 5. CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. or repor was repared by me or under my - t— _ oh ,f o e ________-- SEE SHEET LZ P III / / / 6. MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION direct supervision and that I a duly . ..�,,,_ oh oufo_ _o_ufo —oufo ufo ----- � _�9�— _mac ----� oh ohkl under the tt ohu --ah� ohu ohu ohu -E-j ohu ohu oufo —o ufo —oufo o ufo oufo__ o ufo ufo _ufo _ Licensed Landscape Architect ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo -------hu------- -----_ g= � _` ____ __ laws of the State of Minnesota ug u9 �f{r -- ---- u9 ug u u Sul--��g F— u�`� ——————————————————————— u9 ———————- ——— ————_ _ u uL ug ug u9 u9 u9 u9 u9 � I — — � —— —— _— u ug ug — ug — — � � - --- 3-- G ug Ug / u N gI V - - ----- rrr /, , -- ------------------------------------------ _ter--�_ �——��-__ ��_-�_�-�_��__—��__ -�-�-�=y—� a ------------------------- ---------sue- 3 ' CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Nam ------------------------------- RLA ol __ ---- r--��--- _- - \ -,� -- ---------------------- --- / e: Ryan uttger, ______________c-�--�--- ----------- �, ---- �- � I • Signature: --------- ` � - --- it MAIN STREET \ 9 —f I �'�--� , Date: 09/13/21 License #: 56346 0 \ v i- • ` �o o --- --- --- A \ ! O ]E DALE LAN D C IP E IP L 0 15 30 6o Know what's below. L 1 Of (IN FEET) Call before you dig. 3 0 Ln J Q Z_ W 0 Z f U Z Z LLI> 1x X U t9 IOC > LL f Z =11 Z ? z W U) W Q p 1 - m U) \ I IIIII IIII Z c Q I I I HI— orI —I O I—I—I o>, I I I I I I I—I- � LU d I � / / / /��/ / � IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I—I I I I I I I—I- —I —I ■ ni z � a �—I—I —I / /���/ / /�� —I —I —I —I—I —I 4 —I— ——I —I- LU I I I I I I— I I—I I I—I I � > M —I �' � ' �' / ° 4 4 _ ° —I—I —I —I- �o —I—I ° ° —I —— — —I —I R ° ° ° �� 4 _ —II ICI — �IIIII�I- o x ° ° 4 4 —I _ _ —I —I- LU----I—I—I ° LL —I / ,,/ / / /,,/ 4 - I —I —I— —I—I— I --I—I—I —I " " " " " o 0 0 0 ° ° 4 0°° °° o ° o° ° o° o° ° ° ° o ° o ° ° ° —I --I--I -I- o -----I—I—I -- —I—I —I o 0 0 0 0 0 o•o 0 0 o b o 0 0 o z n ------- — --I—I—I ° -- —I—I ° o o°o o°o ° o� °•o ° ° a° ° o ° o° —I — — —I—I — -I- 0I- -� 00 ° 0 o0 0 F6� --I o o•O o I---II M W I—I- � 1�I—�^Z 2�IIIII�Q��1`2 ��`III1IIIIIII\—�-------\1IIIIIIII�\�--�--����IIIIIIII—�------���1IIIIIIII 1=��—�--��IIIIIIIa iI��C�—r�—IIIIIII C—�=_I IIIIII�--�III nIIIIIII l—_�--�IIII d'IIIII-----IIIIII o1IIII=--�—IIIII1,IIII-----oIIIIIII�1I1=--=—�IIIIIIII III�----o°IIIII1 1III=---�IlIIIII°III°1----1 IIIIII 1II=--�o�III1I�III o,--0�1III.1IIo—°°IrI1III--�•11III�,IilI1III I00—,�Il1III�,I�°lI1II1I Il1III�-1II�lI1I1I 1"--°°Il1III�1I-o°�—b�oIlI1IIII�—°Il1II�+ =_ce— __—�_j- a IIIIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0O_a�.•N�000000�oo0 N \II II0°I�\II 0o\I� II�I� II00 I�00II I� 0� 00 II�0°I II 0I 0�°I0�00I II� II0II�0 II 00°II�00�II 0II� II0 II� II000II� \00II I�0 I 0o�00°0 II 0I II�00° 0 I �00Oo I II�0\0II 0II�°II II�00oII 0II� 0IIoII000 III 0o0O°II bO 1III�o0oI°°°000 °°°III 0�0oo0oOoO°°°°°°°II o0o°O�II•o0o�0o0 oao°°oo°ooII b°°�oIII0OO°�IIOOO III o0o�oo4o0o4°°o0o II b°°ba oo00III°°°°°o II ooIII----4°o II°---ooO°°IIII C---oIIIII — � O°°IIIII o�--�--\0o0QV°IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�--°o_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIi --��--0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1I-�--IIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII�III1II--�-----IlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1II.IIIIII�--IIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII�III1II—�/IIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIII1lII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII�III1I- _—IIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1I�IIIIIIIlII�----------I—IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1III�IIIIIIIII�III1II IIIII1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1II IIIII1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1III�IIIIIIIII�III1IIl-----�--�-----i-IIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII1II -- - IIIIIII1II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIII1IIIIIIIIIII�IIII1II - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- ----_--- __- _- _-- _- - - -__--__---=-___-_- - _- - ISSUE(VZQJaZJ"DA•T � W ° o 0 5 10 20 �� I I I a� LANDSCAPE PLAN E pCE E — ° ( I �VCIDWq2 - W (IN FEET) 09� LU VJ1� 3aO PROPOSED MEDICAL ° BUILDINQ 4 ° ° I J 0 o � ° � � ———————— �� ---I—I—I o �, - - —1I�I�I�I� — o° a-J 0 5 10 20LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT W 42 (IN FEET) O JLL0 0 o °°O °°O LANDSCAPE EDGING AND ROCK MULCH I I I I I 4 o a REVISIONS 0o°0 Pb�o 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS 4 ° o0 I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE NOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE ° IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THEDEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIODNOT PAINT CUTS. ° GUY SSEPLAN 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL MBLY-16, OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE DRAWN BY: ro��caRJ� R INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (40 MIL)1-1/2° WIDE STRAP(TYP) 1 a)UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-1" RJR 8 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS ROLLED STEEL POSTS(MNDOT 3401) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH A 180°O.G. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET,(IF USED),INTACT. TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE 00PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12"OF THE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) TOP 1/3 12 THE TOP TWO UNFRDINATE 0 0 0 000O KING TO INSURE 2 a°O I hereby certify that this plan, specificationOF THE KS OM ATION OF GUYTREE WRAP L 0 0 0HORIZONTALRING WHICHEVER S CREATE 12 NES AND STAKES or report was prepared by me or under my REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP direct supervision and that I am a dulyRDWOO MULCH INCHES HA 1/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE. STAKING DIAGRAM I I I I I N Licensed Landscape Architect under the 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH laws of the State of Minnesota. 8' STEEL TEE POST- BACKFILL SOIL GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING 3 REQUIRED AT 129 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL FLAGGING-ONE PER WIRE 4 INCHES MULCH BACKFILL MIX VOIDS. 4"-&° SHREDDED BARK ( SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES Name: Ryan 1. Ruttger, RLA 10 FOR TYPE OF MULCH CIA MULCH ,. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF EXISTING GRADE THEN UNDSTURBED SUBSOIL INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST Bf I ISUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE REMOVE BURLAP ; ROPE I I I IM111II I I I I Im i MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT EALL F , REMOVE BURLAP $ ROPE ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL I I I I I I Date: 09/13/21 License #: 56346 FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL 1 PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE(SEE SPEC.) ol BACKFILL MI8. PLACEMULCHWITHIN 48 HOURS OF I 11 11111 I I arHEsfcoNDWATERwGUNLEsssOIL UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. MOSTURE 15 EXCESSIVE. SUBSOIL vv'ol°0nv° LN� C P� ]P� N ]ENS �C�ElV�]EN�[' 2( 30 5 1 L DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL R CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL r SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL 10 20 ANOT M SCALE L NOT TO SCALE NOT M SCALE of ° qJ2 (IN FEET) 3 0 v J Q Z LU o PLANT SCHEDULE Z f N U TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER LU - Z Z z W W I Z Q RM 3 Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2" Cal. B&B BCB 10 Aronia melanocarpa 'Autumn Magic' Autumn Magic Black Chokeberry #5 Cont. �z-� > w U Z Z LU N1 LU J N • m J p SSC 13 Clethra alnifolia 'Hummingbird' Summersweet #5 Cont. o lx FM 2 Acer x freemanii 'Sienna' Sienna Glen Maple 2" Cal. B&B0 Z ,O Q U 0 W / RTD 9 Corpus sericea 'Alleman's Compact' Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood #5 Cont. 0 1 Lh RB 3 Betula nigra River Birch Multi-Trunk 8' Ht. B&B Z CO Clump Form, 2" Cal Equivalent DBH 27 Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle #5 Cont. LU.. � tM0 X LU • KC 4 Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso' Kentucky Coffeetree 2 Cal. B&B CWH 5 Hamamelis virginiana Common Witch Hazel #5 Cont. 0 IL /F 0 0 ABH 16 Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea #5 Cont. a HO 1 Quercus x macdanielii 'Clemons' TM Heritage Oak 2" Cal. B&B a co W 14 a NBS 5 Physocarpus opulifolius 'Seward' TM Summer Wine Seward Ninebark #5 Cont. o COD W BL 8 Tilia americana 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden 2" Cal. B&B 0 O LLA 13 Rhododendron x 'Lemon Lights' Lemon Lights Azalea #5 Cont. CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER APC 9 Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant #5 Cont. BF 3 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6' Ht. B&B I iitile��e SPG 17 Spiraea x bumalda 'Goldflame' Goldflame Spirea #5 Cont. Gold Foliage, Red Flowers W WP 3 Pinus strobus White Pine 6' Ht. B&B Z MKL 14 Syringa patula 'Miss Kim' Miss Kim Lilac #5 Cont. ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER EVERGREEN SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER J a Z -1 O SB 6 Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7' Ht. B&B JSG 10 Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper #5 Cont. a W Q N Clump Form, Red Fall Color, 1.5" Cal Equivalent � LUJ C I�1 •- a V = CA 3 Malus x 'Prairifire' Prairifire Crabapple 1.5" Cal. B&B 147% YEW 19 Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' Tauton Yew #5 Cont. Red Flowers W ARB 3 Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' Techny Arborvitae #5 Cont. Q 0 LU _JJL 3 Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal. B&B Z Z 0 0 White Flowers GRASSES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER Q LU ~ C � J KFG 21 Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Feather Reed Grass #2 Cont. xg44 PDS 14 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #2 Cont. 0 PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER Q DLB 58 Hemerocallis x 'Baja' Baja Daylily #1 Cont. Red Flowers LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS LRS 28 Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Little Spire' Little Spire Russian Sage #1 Cont. V 1. TREE PROTECTION. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR MARKED ON SITE FOR REMOVAL SHALL REMAIN PROTECTED 11. MULCH MATERIAL. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR ROCK MULCH AS INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL MULCH SHALL J AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND TO THE DRIP LINE, WITHIN WHICH NO BE CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS, SOIL, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER A J CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MATERIAL STORAGE, OR VEHICLE PARKING SHALL BE PERMITTED. TREE PROTECTION FENCING NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (INCIDENTAL) OR OTHER APPROVED WEED BARRIER TO A MINIMUM SETTLED DEPTH OF SCS 12 Sedum spectabile 'Autumn Joy' Stonecrop #1 Cont. n SHALL BE ERECTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START PER PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4". MULCH SHALL BE HELD BACK FROM PLANT STEMS/TRUNKS A MINIMUM OF 3". WOOD MULCH SHALL BE PLACED rV AND SHALL CONSIST OF 4' TALL HEAVY DUTY ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH 6' STEEL FENCE POSTS SPACED 6' AROUND INDIVIDUAL TREES TO A 4' MINIMUM DIAMETER. MULCH SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 48-HOURS OF PLANT Z O.C. MAX. INSTALLATION. M �"� 2. EROSION CONTROL. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP), AND 12. LANDSCAPE EDGING. INSTALL LANDSCAPE EDGING BETWEEN ALL MULCH AREAS AND TURF. EDGING SHALL BE GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER 4-J Q N Ln TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER BMPS, INCLUDING SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS, INLET PROTECTION, EROSION COMMERCIAL GRADE BLACK POLYETHYLENE OR VINYL EDGING, 0.1 INCH THICK BY 5 INCHES DEEP, V-LIPPED BOTTOM, BDW 182 Corpus canadensis Bunchberry Dogwood 4" Cont. LLn CONTROL BLANKETING, DUST CONTROL, SWEEPING AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HORIZONTALLY GROOVED, 1-INCH ROUND TOP, EXTRUDED IN STANDARD LENGTHS, WITH 9-INCH STEEL ANGLE STAKES. Plant 18" o.c. triangular spacing, with 2" J 4-' RECEIVE PERMANENT STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION depth double-shredded hardwood mulch (no ~ Ln z ACTIVITY IN THE DISTURBED AREA HAS CEASED. IN THE EVENT PERMANENT STABILIZATION CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED 13. IRRIGATION. DESIGN, FURNISH AND INSTALL A COMPLETE UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM FROM APPROVED = L WITHIN 7 DAYS, TEMPORARY STABILIZATION BMPS MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 7 DAYS USING. POINTS)-OF-CONNECTION WITHIN THE SITE COVERING ALL TURF AND PLANTING AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE fabric). m 4-1 00 PLAN. INCLUDES FLOW PRESSURE TESTING, PLANS WITH DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, LABOR, o° ° ° ° ° ° / o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ROCK 3,529 sf Rock Mulch 1.5 Trap Rock Mulch 4 Depth C 3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL AREAS INDICATED MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES FOR THE TESTING, ADJUSTING, RETESTING AND READJUSTING AS REQUIRED TO o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 . 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Woven Geotextile Incidental LU 0 AS BEING DISTURBED OR OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL AND PLACE THE SYSTEM IN AN APPROVED OPERATING CONDITION. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE THE DESIGN AND °ao0 o0o0 o0o0 oao0 oao0 0 DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, STUMPS, BRUSH, GRASS, ROOTS AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE o O0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING: PIPING, METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, SPRINKLER HEADS, CABINETS, VALVES o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DISPOSAL LOCATION. AND VALVE BOXES, CONTROLLERS, CONTROL WIRING, FITTINGS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, QUICK-COUPLERS, ALL OTHER SOD 31,497 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Blue rass sod LU -------I-I-I g y g NECESSARY ACCESSORIES, SYSTEM MANUALS, 1-YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD INCLUDING 1 FALL WINTERIZATION AND 1 4. SOIL PREPARATION. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY REQUIRED SOIL CORRECTIONS, AMENDMENTS OR SPRING START-UP. IRRIGATION PLANS TO BE PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED IRRIGATION DESIGNER AND SUBMITTED TO ---�-�-� ,--I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (IF APPLICABLE). EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED FROM ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. --------- Z STOCKPILED IN AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR RE-SPREAD. ALL AREAS WHERE SOIL HAS BEEN COMPACTED BY TII 3,928 sf Type II -Wet Meadow Seed Mix MnDOT Seed Mix 34-271 seed H co ACTIVITY AND THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE SODDED, SEEDED OR PLANTING BED SHALL BE 14. MAINTENANCE. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT Refer to notes for acce table seedin DE-COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES BY SOIL RIPPING, TILLING OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL LOOSENING MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION p g J METHOD. HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE methods. Seeding Rate 18.0 Ib/ac LL MOWING, TRIMMING, WATERING, FERTILIZING, WEED AND PESTICIDE CONTROL, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, TIV 15,533 sf Type IV- Native Seed Mix MnDOT Seed Mix 35-241 seed 5. TOPSOIL MATERIAL. ALL EXISTING, AMENDED OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT TOPSOIL RE-SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER yp li TYPE A. A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. A SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL Refer to notes for acceptable seeding Q MINIMUM 12 INCH DEPTH OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN ALL PLANTING BED AREAS. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE FINE PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. methods. Seeding Rate 50.0 Ib/ac GRADED, RAKED AND DRAGGED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. TOPSOIL GRADES SHALL BE WITHIN .1 FEET OF INDICATED FINISHED GRADE AND SHALL BE TRUE TO GRADIENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS 15. WATERING. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF SEED AND INSTALLATION OF PLANTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A WATERING FOR FILTRATION BASIN SOIL REQUIREMENTS. SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS AND TURF AREAS A MINIMUM OF ONCE A WEEK. MORE FREQUENT WATERING MAY BE REQUIRED DURING PERIODS OF HOT, DRY WEATHER. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE REVISIONS 6. SEEDING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. IN THE ABSENCE OF PERMANENT IRRIGATION, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION, TREE 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS GRADES AND TOPSOIL PREP PRIOR TO SEEDING. APPLY 12-12-12 GRANULAR STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 250 WATERING BAGS, OR HAND-WATERING ARE ACCEPTABLE. LBS PER ACRE PRIOR TO SEEDING.. SEEDS SHALL BE SOWED IN 2 PERPENDICULAR PASSES, EACH PASS AT ONE-HALF THE INDICATED RATE, VIA BROADCAST SPREADER, DROP SEEDER OR DRILL SEEDER. FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION, 16. NATIVE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. THIS PROJECT INCLUDES ONE OR MORE NATIVE PLANT SEED MIXES CONSISTING OF A INSTALL TYPE 3N EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1. IN ALL OTHER AREAS, APPLY VARIETY OF GRASSES, SEDGES AND FLOWERING FORBS. BECAUSE THESE PLANTS TYPICALLY HAVE A LONGER HYDROMULCH COVER (MUST BE A SEPARATE OPERATION FROM SEEDING) AT A TARGETED DRY WEIGHT RATE OF 3500 GERMINATION PERIOD, A COVER CROP SPECIES IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER AND STABILIZATION. LBS PER ACRE. SOIL SHALL BE KEPT MOIST DURING ESTABLISHMENT WITH ADDITIONAL RE-SEEDING AS NECESSARY TO MAINTENANCE OF THESE SEEDED AREAS IS CRITICAL DURING THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS TO ESTABLISH A SUCCESSFUL ACHIEVE A HEALTHY, UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS, FREE OF WEEDS AND WITH COVERAGE EXCEEDING 75% IN ANY 10'x10' NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED / WEED-WHIPPED TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES IN AREA PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. MID-JULY AND EARLY SEPTEMBER DURING THE FIRST 2-3 YEARS OF ESTABLISHMENT. IN ADDITION, ALL NON-NATIVE DRAWN BY: RJR "I SPECIES / WEEDS SHALL BE SPOT SPRAYED NO LESS THAN 3 TIMES A YEAR WITH HERBICIDE BY A LICENSED 7. SODDING. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES AND TOPSOIL APPLICATOR. RE-SEEDING AS NECESSARY SHALL OCCUR IN MAY. A NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSIDERED DESIGNED BY: RJR PREP PRIOR TO SODDING. APPLY 12-12-12 GRANULAR STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 250 LBS PER ACRE PRIOR SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED NO SOONER THAT 3 YEARS AFTER INITIAL SEEDING - ONCE THE COVER CROP HAS BEEN ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 m TO SODDING AND ROLL TOPSOIL TO CREATE A UNIFORM SURFACE FOR LAYING SOD. SOD SHALL NOT BE CUT MORE SUFFICIENTLY REPLACED BY NATIVE PLANTS AND THE AREA IS FREE OF ALL NON-NATIVE AND INVASIVE SPECIES. AT THAN 24-HOURS IN ADVANCE OF INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP SOD MOIST FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS THIS TIME, MAINTENANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO MOWING / WEED-WHIPPING TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES ONCE A YEAR AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SOD UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. IN EARLY SEPTEMBER AND SPOT SPRAYING OF HERBACIDE ONLY AS NEEDED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification w 8. PLANT MATERIAL. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," 17. FINAL ACCEPTANCE. UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST FINAL ACCEPTANCE or report was prepared by me or under my ANSI-Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM OF THE WORK IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF ANY WORK IS FOUND TO BE INCOMPLETE OR direct supervision and that I am a duly QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY UNSATISFACTORY IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, A WRITTEN PUNCH LIST WILL BE PREPARED Licensed Landscape Architect under the PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. NO SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT LISTING ALL ITEMS THAT REQUIRE COMPLETING OR CORRECTING BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. laws of the State of Minnesota. MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. WARRANTY. ALL PLANTS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA FINAL ACCEPTANCE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT 9. PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS. ALL REQUESTS FOR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING TO THE INCLUDING LABOR AND MATERIAL. Signature: OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. Date: 09/13/21 License #: 56346 8 10. PLANT INSTALLATION AND ESTABLISHMENT. REFER TO STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, o TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM w THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE. L30 of0 3 Y 0 v