HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-11-2020 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, May 11, 2020
***********
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
Meeting to be held electronically
Pursuant to MN Statute 13D.021
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call - Councilmembers Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, Cavegn and
Mayor Rafferty were present for the on-line meeting
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment (telephonically only)
Jamie Jensen, St. Clair Estates developer, asked for assistance in finalizing his accounts
with the City.
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
The agenda was approved as presented.
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) May 11, 2020 (Check No. 112186 through 112241) in the amount of $158,863.97
B) Consider Approval of April 27, 2020 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider Approval of April 27, 2020 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider Approval of May 4, 2020 Board of Appeal Minutes
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Cavegn, to approve Consent Agenda
Items 1A through 1D as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Pro Rata Fee Refunds and Payment Schedule Amendment for Annual Business
Licenses, Julie Bartell
How to Join the Meeting
Phone: Dial 1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 865 3700 5267
Weblink:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86537005267
Council Agenda -2- May 11, 2020
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Lyden, to approve the fee changes
as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution 20-45 Approving Allina Ambulance as the Primary Ambulance
Service for the City of Lino Lakes
Action Taken: Motion by Lyden, seconded by Ruhland, to approve Resolution No.
20-45, the Lease Agreement with Allina Ambulance and the Allina Medical
Direction & Training Agreement as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Nadeau Acres, Katie Larsen -
i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-20 Rezoning Property from R, Rural
to R-1, Single Family Residential
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Cavegn, to approve the 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 02-20 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 4; Nays, 1 (Lyden)
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-20 Approving Preliminary Plat and Opening Sub-District
3C & 3D of Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025)
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Ruhland, to approve Resolution No.
20-20 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 3; Nays, 2 (Lyden, Cavegn)
B) Lyngblomsten PUD Amendment #1, Katie Larsen
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-44 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan
Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan
Action Taken: Motion by Lyden, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution No.
20-44 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
C) Watermark 3rd Addition, Katie Larsen
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-30 Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution
No. 20-30 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-31 Approving Development Agreement
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Ruhland, to approve Resolution
No. 20-31 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
D) Consider Resolution No. 20-46, Approving I-35E AUAR Update, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Lyden, to approve Resolution
No. 20-46 as presented, was adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none
Council Agenda -3- May 11, 2020
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
May 11, 2020 through May 26, 2020
See meeting agendas for access information
Tuesday, May 26 6:00 pm Council Work Session
Tuesday, May 26 6:30 pm City Council Meeting
Updated 5/8/2020
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, May 11, 2020
***********
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
Meeting to be held electronically
Pursuant to MN Statute 13D.021
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) May 11, 2020 (Check No. 112186 through 112241) in the amount of $158,863.97
B) Consider Approval of April 27, 2020 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider Approval of April 27, 2020 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider Approval of May 4, 2020 Board of Appeal Minutes
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Pro Rata Fee Refunds and Payment Schedule Amendment for Annual Business
Licenses, Julie Bartell
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution 20-45 Approving Allina Ambulance as the Primary Ambulance
Service for the City of Lino Lakes
How to Join the Meeting
Phone: Dial 1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 865 3700 5267
Weblink:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86537005267
Council Agenda -2- May 11, 2020
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Nadeau Acres, Katie Larsen - Updated
i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-20 Rezoning Property from R, Rural
to R-1, Single Family Residential
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-20 Approving Preliminary Plat and Opening Sub-
District 3C & 3D of Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025)
B) Lyngblomsten PUD Amendment #1, Katie Larsen
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-44 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan
Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan
C) Watermark 3rd Addition, Katie Larsen
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-30 Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-31 Approving Development Agreement
D) Consider Resolution No.20-46, Approving I-35E AUAR Update, Michael Grochala
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
May 11, 2020 through May 26, 2020
See meeting agendas for access information
Tuesday, May 26 6:00 pm Council Work Session
Tuesday, May 26 6:30 pm City Council Meeting
Expenditures
May 11, 2020
Check #112186 to #112241
$158,863.97
City of Lino Lakes
Activity Codes
Code Description Code Description
401 Mayor/Council 817 Spring Fling
402 Administration 818 Winter Festival
403 Elections 819 Community Gardens
404 Cable TV 822 Family Corn Roast
405 Charter Administration 827 Gobbler Games
407 Finance 830 Adult Golf Lessons
414 Legal Consultants 835 Youth Skating Class
415 Economic Development 850 Golf Academy
416 Planning & Zoning 856 Youth Soccer
417 Engineering 857 Soccer Fundamentals
418 Community Development 860 Secret Shop
420 Police Protection 864 Preschool Playtime
421 Fire Protection 868 Little Goblins Party
422 Building Inspections 871 Flag Football
430 Streets 875 Snow Day
431 Fleet Management 876 Kite Day
432 Government Buildings 877 Rockin' in the Park
450 Parks 879 Movies in the Park
451 Recreation 890 Senior Programs
461 Environmental
462 Solid Waste Abatement
463 Forestry
494 Water
495 Sanitary Sewer
499 Other
802 Dodgeball Camp
806 Youth T-Ball
808 Youth Baseball Camp
810 Youth Playground
811 Youth Safety Camp
812 Youth Art Camps
814 Senior Programs/Book Club
AP Checks by Account Number
05/11/2020 City Council Meeting
Vendor Fund/Dept Account Amount Check # Description
AFSCME Council #5 101-000 101-000-2040-000 411.92 112187 PR Batch 00002.05.2020 Union Dues AFSCME
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. 101-000 101-000-2040-000 4.87 112211 May Vision Insurance Premiums
International Union 101-000 101-000-2040-000 525.00 112189 PR Batch 00002.05.2020 Union Dues 49ers
Law Enforcement Labor Services 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,364.00 112190 PR Batch 00002.05.2020 Union Dues LELS
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. 101-000 101-000-2048-000 90.95 112211 May Vision Insurance Premiums
Noah Acquisitions LLC 101-000 101-000-3254-000 53.60 112227 No Permit Required for Water Softener Installation
101-000 Total 2,450.34
Shred-it c/o Stericycle Inc. 101-402 101-402-4410-000 26.24 112235 Document Destruction
101-402 Total 26.24
GDO Law 101-414 101-414-4303-000 8,500.00 112214 April Legal Prosecutor Contract
101-414 Total 8,500.00
Conney Safety 101-420 101-420-4211-000 66.95 112204 KC Kleenguard A40 Hoods
Menards - Forest Lake 101-420 101-420-4211-000 33.80 112223 Gorilla Black Duct Tape
Streicher's Inc. 101-420 101-420-4211-000 53.10 112238 Department Ammo
Streicher's Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 105.99 112238 Uniform Allowance - T. Vang
Xcel Energy 101-420 101-420-4381-000 3.47 112191 Electric-Police
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-420 101-420-4410-000 390.00 112201 CJDN State GF & CJDN BCA Access Fee
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-420 101-420-4410-000 36.00 112224 Copier Maintenance Ricoh/MP 4055SP
Performance Plus LLC 101-420 101-420-4410-000 44.00 112230 Mask Fit Respirator - A. Ng
Shred-it c/o Stericycle Inc. 101-420 101-420-4410-000 52.48 112235 Document Destruction
101-420 Total 785.79
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-421 101-421-4370-000 223.20 112197 Fire Uniform - V. Kasprowicz
101-421 Total 223.20
Frattallone's/Circle Pines Ace 101-430 101-430-4211-000 5.58 112212 Pipe Hex Nipple
Menards - Forest Lake 101-430 101-430-4211-000 30.12 112223 Pine Boards
Menards - Forest Lake 101-430 101-430-4211-000 52.56 112223 Lumber
Midwest Groundcover 101-430 101-430-4211-000 5,400.00 112225 Hardwood Mulch Installation
Street Smart Rental 101-430 101-430-4223-000 1,452.50 112237 Five Type III Portable Barricades
Xcel Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 494.28 112191 Electric-Street Lights
Roadkill Animal Control 101-430 101-430-4410-000 186.00 112233 March Deer Pick- up/Disposal
Street Smart Rental 101-430 101-430-4415-000 350.00 112237 Two Arrow Board Trailers & Attenuator for Lake Dr. Median Work
101-430 Total 7,971.04
Batteries Plus Bulbs 101-431 101-431-4221-000 134.95 112198 #383 Battery
Boyer Trucks Inc. 101-431 101-431-4221-000 212.32 112199 #434 Tank - Air. P Mounting
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 185.98 112209 #394 Caliper Asy Brakes
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 -112.00 112209 Caliper Asy Brakes Core Credit
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 102.45 112209 #119 Del 51Ps
Frontier Ag & Turf 101-431 101-431-4221-000 149.38 112213 #135 5 Gal Hygards
Frontier Ag & Turf 101-431 101-431-4221-000 22.41 112213 #144 Sec Air Filter
Hugo Equipment Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 18.99 112218 Buffalo Blower Air Filter
Hydraulics Plus & Consulting 101-431 101-431-4221-000 96.46 112219 Grapple Bucket Attachment
L.T.G. Power Equipment 101-431 101-431-4221-000 204.54 112222 #415 Oil Filter & Hydro Change Kit
L.T.G. Power Equipment 101-431 101-431-4221-000 49.75 112222 #415 15W50 Oil
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 207.83 112229 #Stock Oil & Air Filters
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 68.45 112229 #135 Oil Filter & Hyd Filter
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 -43.36 112229 Parts Return/Credit
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 10.15 112229 #144 Fuel Filter
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 21.70 112229 #Stock Oil Filters
Custom Fire Apparatus Inc. 101-431 101-431-4363-000 1,405.34 112207 #620 E-11 Extrication Tray Bent Claim 3-4-2020
Towmaster 101-431 101-431-4363-000 9,612.00 112239 #218 Plow Truck Scraper Claim
101-431 Total 12,347.34
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-432 101-432-4211-000 18.77 112229 Carpet & Upholstery Cleaner
Menards - Forest Lake 101-432 101-432-4211-503 258.41 112223 Acrylic Sheet Sheet Cutter Stove Bolt Corner Brace
Menards - Forest Lake 101-432 101-432-4211-503 61.18 112223 Brass Ball Eip
Menards - Forest Lake 101-432 101-432-4211-503 23.56 112223 Com GR Bracket
Winnick Supply Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-503 3.27 112241 Sloan Vacuum Breaker Repair Kit
Winnick Supply Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-503 20.48 112241 5/8" Silver & Deming Bit
Winnick Supply Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-503 46.97 112241 Brass Closet Spud Sloan Vacuum Breaker & Spud Coupling Assembly
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 101-432 101-432-4300-500 328.40 112195 2020 Property Tax Solid Waste Management Charge
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-500 75.00 112196 May Cac Fiber
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 101-432 101-432-4300-501 545.16 112195 2020 Property Tax Solid Waste Management Charge
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-501 75.00 112196 May Cac Fiber
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 101-432 101-432-4300-502 545.16 112195 2020 Property Tax Solid Waste Management Charge
Page 1
AP Checks by Account Number
05/11/2020 City Council Meeting
Vendor Fund/Dept Account Amount Check # Description
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 101-432 101-432-4300-503 545.16 112195 2020 Property Tax Solid Waste Management Charge
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-503 75.00 112196 May Cac Fiber
Wheeler Hardware Company 101-432 101-432-4300-503 9,880.00 112240 Exit Device Replacements
Comcast 101-432 101-432-4321-502 352.28 112203 May Phone & Internet
CenturyLink 101-432 101-432-4321-503 55.61 112188 Phone - Civic Complex Fire Protection Equipment
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-501 337.98 112191 Electric-Fire Station #1
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-502 932.08 112191 Electric-Fire Station #2
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-503 3,531.90 112191 Electric-Civic Complex
CenterPoint Energy 101-432 101-432-4383-000 73.40 112202 Natural Gas - 7685 Lake Dr
AmeriPride Services Inc. 101-432 101-432-4410-503 172.20 112193 Mats
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-503 142.77 112224 Copier Maintenance Ricoh/MP C307
101-432 Total 18,099.74
Hardwood Creek Lumber Inc. 101-450 101-450-4211-000 114.24 112216 48" Pine Lath 1"x2"x48" Hubs
Xcel Energy 101-450 101-450-4381-000 126.91 112191 Electric-Parks
All Seasons Rental Inc. 101-450 101-450-4415-000 60.35 112192 Chop Saw & Diamond Blade
101-450 Total 301.50
Gerten Greenhouses & Garden Center Inc. 101-461 101-461-4211-000 132.90 112215 Tree - Age Arborplugs Aquaneat
Hardwood Creek Lumber Inc. 101-461 101-461-4211-000 114.24 112216 48" Pine Lath 1"x2"x48" Hubs
101-461 Total 247.14
Gerten Greenhouses & Garden Center Inc. 101-463 101-463-4211-000 2,377.20 112215 Tree - Age Arborplugs Aquaneat
101-463 Total 2,377.20
Anoka County Attorney's Office 207-420 207-420-4300-000 96.00 112194 Forfeiture Distribution ICR #17-085209-2
State of MN - Department of Finance 207-420 207-420-4300-000 48.00 112236 Forfeiture Distribution ICR #17-085209-2
207-420 Total 144.00
MN Department of Public Safety 208-420 208-420-4300-000 25.00 112226 Transfer & Title Fee for Seized Vehicle 2001 Chevrolet Silverado
208-420 Total 25.00
Northern Air Corporation 401-432 401-432-5000-000 16,320.00 112228 Main Contract LL Police Station Phase 2 TC
401-432 Total 16,320.00
Playpower LT Farmington Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-120 65,848.50 112231 Playground Installation
405-499 Total 65,848.50
JAIN SAURABH 406-000 406-000-2020-000 1.16 112220 Refund Check 017849-000 703 EAGLE CT
JOHNSON DARREN 406-000 406-000-2020-000 7.10 112221 Refund Check 014019-000 2231 TART LAKE RD
406-000 Total 8.26
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 406-499 406-499-4300-000 1,494.52 112195 2020 Property Tax West Shadow Lake Dr Util Special Assessment
406-499 Total 1,494.52
JAIN SAURABH 601-000 601-000-2020-000 0.28 112220 Refund Check 017849-000 703 EAGLE CT
JAIN SAURABH 601-000 601-000-2020-000 2.78 112220 Refund Check 017849-000 703 EAGLE CT
JOHNSON DARREN 601-000 601-000-2020-000 35.42 112221 Refund Check 014019-000 2231 TART LAKE RD
JOHNSON DARREN 601-000 601-000-2020-000 1.73 112221 Refund Check 014019-000 2231 TART LAKE RD
601-000 Total 40.21
Curtis 1000 Inc. 601-494 601-494-4200-000 723.45 112206 UB Statements
Core & Main LP 601-494 601-494-4211-000 1,209.22 112205 FS1-724-15-CC4 6X15X1CC Tart Rep Clp 6.84-7.24 Od
Core & Main LP 601-494 601-494-4211-000 196.47 112205 Kochek Storz Nozzle Caps
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 601-494 601-494-4211-000 833.13 112210 LF 1 CC x Flr Ball Corp & F1-7.24 x 12.5 - CC4 Clmp
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4222-000 50.00 112217 Chlorine Cylinders
Circle Pines Post Office 601-494 601-494-4322-000 441.60 112186 Utility Billing Postage
Xcel Energy 601-494 601-494-4381-000 2,894.87 112191 Electric-Water
601-494 Total 6,348.74
JAIN SAURABH 602-000 602-000-2020-000 6.44 112220 Refund Check 017849-000 703 EAGLE CT
JOHNSON DARREN 602-000 602-000-2020-000 39.57 112221 Refund Check 014019-000 2231 TART LAKE RD
JOHNSON DARREN 602-000 602-000-2020-000 9.11 112221 Refund Check 014019-000 2231 TART LAKE RD
602-000 Total 55.12
Curtis 1000 Inc. 602-495 602-495-4200-000 723.45 112206 UB Statements
Bryan Rock Products Inc. 602-495 602-495-4211-000 3,031.80 112200 3/4" With Fin
Davids Hydro Vac Inc. 602-495 602-495-4300-000 5,303.00 112208 Vac Services - 1477 Snow Goose Trl.
Davids Hydro Vac Inc. 602-495 602-495-4300-000 1,430.00 112208 Vac Services - 1477 Snow Goose Trl.
Circle Pines Post Office 602-495 602-495-4322-000 441.60 112186 Utility Billing Postage
Xcel Energy 602-495 602-495-4381-000 1,848.41 112191 Electric-Sewer
602-495 Total 12,778.26
Press Publications Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 187.15 112232 Ord 03-20 Quad - 617 Apollo Drive
Sharper Homes Inc. 801-000 801-000-2318-000 900.00 112234 Escrow Release - 6623 Enid Trail
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 801-000 801-000-2319-106 1,378.00 112195 2020 Property Tax NorthPointe 4th Addn
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation 801-000 801-000-2339-102 6.68 112195 2020 Property Tax NorthPointe 5th Addn
Page 2
AP Checks by Account Number
05/11/2020 City Council Meeting
Vendor Fund/Dept Account Amount Check # Description
801-000 Total 2,471.83
Grand Total 158,863.97
Page 3
Electronic Funds Transfer
MN Statute 471.38 Subd. 3
Council Meeting May 11, 2020 Transfer In/(Out)
4/27/2020 Wire from 4M Fund (2018A GO Bonds Acct) 150,000.00
4/27/2020 Wire from 4M Fund (Gen Acct) 600,000.00
4/27/2020 PD Patrol Holiday Pay 1/15/19 - 12/31/19 (22,461.05)
4/27/2020 PD Patrol Holiday Pay Federal Deposit (2,631.97)
4/27/2020 PD Patrol Holiday Pay PERA (8,549.12)
4/27/2020 PD Patrol Holiday Pay State (887.64)
5/1/2020 Council Payroll (3,364.82)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 (135,023.91)
5/1/2020 Council Federal Deposit (146.60)
5/1/2020 Council PERA (367.62)
5/1/2020 Council State (34.06)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 Federal Deposit (41,109.56)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 PERA (44,874.04)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 State (9,355.73)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 Child Support (583.62)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 H.S.A. Bank Pretax (3,165.50)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 TASC Pretax (713.41)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 ICMA 457 Def. Comp #301596 (4,665.00)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 ICMA Roth IRA #706155 (615.75)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 MSRS HCSP #98946-01 (3,090.77)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 MSRS Def. Comp #98945-01 (3,210.00)
5/1/2020 Payroll #09 MSRS Roth IRS #98945-01 (575.00)
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : April 27, 2020 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 6:30 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, 7
Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Finance Director Sarah Cotton; 11
Director of Public Safety John Swenson; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; 12
Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; 13
Human Resources Manager Karissa Bartholomew; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 14
15
The council meeting was held telephonically on the Zoom Meeting platform and as 16
allowed by Minnesota Statutes 13D.021. 17
18
City Administrator Hiring Process – Human Resources Manager Bartholomew 19
explained that she is bringing forward a process proposed to fill the City Administrator 20
position since current Administrator Jeff Karlson will retire in August. The council has 21
previously approved a resolution including a preliminary offer of employment to Finance 22
Director Cotton. The process also considers filling the Finance Director position. 23
24
Council Member Stoesz asked how a compensation plan would fit into discussion. Ms. 25
Bartholomew explained that a proposal for an employment contract including 26
compensation will be part of the discussion. Council Member Stoesz said he is looking 27
forward to the transition. 28
29
Mayor Rafferty noted the proposed time line. He is wondering if the process is such that 30
there could be a little delay in hiring of another financial director. 31
32
Finance Director Cotton noted that staff is looking into an option should the finance 33
director position not be filled. Staff would intend to br ing forward that option. 34
35
Mayor Rafferty remarked that he understands that the position has been combined by 36
some cities so it comes to mind in this situation. The mayor asked Ms. Cotton about her 37
interest in the position and Ms. Cotton said she is very excited to serve the City in the 38
administrator positon. Mayor Rafferty said he has gotten to know and work with Ms. 39
Cotton. 40
41
Administrator Karlson said he is enthusiastically endorsing Ms. Cotton for the job. 42
43
Ms. Bartholomew indicated that she would work with the City Attorney on drafting an 44
employment contract. Mayor Rafferty suggested that the council would benefit from 45
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
2
seeing that document before being asked to vote on it. When asked about the four month 46
timeline, Ms. Bartholomew indicated that she has offered that time frame to allow 47
flexibility in filling the Finance Director position. 48
49
Council Member Lyden concurred with the Mayor’s remark that Ms. Cotton is thorough 50
and easy to work with. It’s a bonus to have someone coming in that already knows Lino 51
Lakes. He understands that filling the finance position is also driving the schedule. 52
53
Council Member Stoesz remarked that it should be clear in setting up an agreement what a 54
remote work environment would look like for both the administrator and finance director 55
position. 56
57
Mayor Rafferty noted the City Administrator job description currently and asked to see a 58
copy. Also he would like to see what has been rewritten into the position at this point. 59
He wants to fully understand what the administrator position entails and he asked that the 60
information be shared with all council members. 61
62
Review Regular Agenda of April 27, 2020 – 63
64
Item 2A – Finance Director explained that the resolution moves forward the process of 65
issuing and selling bonds for the water tower project. The process is fully laid out in the 66
staff report. She noted that financial consultant Terri Heaton of Baker Tilly will be 67
available to give a report at the council meeting. 68
69
Item 3A – Joint Cooperative Agreement with North Metro Telecommunications – 70
Administrator Karlson noted t hat his staff report includes a marked agreement indicating 71
the changes being requested. He will review at the council meeting. The changes are 72
fairly routine. 73
74
Item 3B – Protect Communit y Television Act – Administrator Karlson noted an order 75
issued by the FCC that would reduce certain franchise fees that go toward community 76
programming. The resolution supports protecting that funding source. 77
78
Item 4A – Public Safety Director Swenson explained the donation coming. The donation 79
relates to the City’s recent host role for an event for the canine organization. 80
81
Item 5A – Lift Station No. 5 – City Engineer Hankee explained that she has been working 82
with Utility staff on a situation with a force main. It is an important fixture and staff feels 83
its repair should be attended to as soon as possible. Based on cost estimates, a new line is 84
seen as more cost effective and two quotes will be presented. 85
86
Item 6B – Fog Seal on City Hall Parking Lot – City Engineer reviewed quotes received 87
and explained how the project could be coordinated. 88
89
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
3
Item 6C – Trail Grant – Community Development Director Grochala explained the 90
opportunity to apply for federal grant funding that would be very helpful in adding to a 91
trail on the north side of the city. 92
93
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. 94
95
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 96
May 11 , 2020. 97
98
99
100
101
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 102
103
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL 2
REGULAR MEETING 3
MINUTES 4
5
DATE : April 27, 2020 6
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 7
TIME ENDED : 8:07 p.m. 8
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Lyden, 9
Ruhland, Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty (via 10
Zoom) 11
MEMBERS ABSENT : 12
13
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Finance Director Sarah Cotton; Director of 14
Public Safety John Swenson; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; Community Development 15
Director Michael Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Utilities Supervisor Justin Williams; and 16
City Clerk Julie Bartell 17
18
The council meeting was held telephonically on the Zoom Meeting platform and as allowed by 19
Minnesota Statutes 13D.021. 20
21
PUBLIC COMMENT 22
Wayne LeBlanc, 1677 Peltier Lake Drive, representative of the environment for many years, 23
including working with restoring the Heron colony on Peltier Island. He works with the 24
Environmental Board. (He noted that comments were submitted by email to the council.) He has 25
concerns with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and in particular the citizen advisory 26
operation which is supposed to be independent and listening to the public and should be free in their 27
discussion. Instead that advisory group is being controlled too much by the RCWD staff; he was 28
banned from discussing an issue. The information he wished to discuss was a water quality issue 29
and he noted the professional expertise behind it. His suggestion is to ask RCWD some questions 30
about the citizens committee (included in Mr. LeBlanc’s email to the City). Mayor Rafferty 31
thanked Mr. LeBlanc and suggested that the council see what answers can be obtained. 32
Mayor Rafferty read a message he’d received. Jamie Jensen, developer of St. Clair Estates in Lino 33
Lakes, asked the council for assistance in obtaining funds back from the City. 34
SETTING THE AGENDA 35
The agenda had been amended to remove Items 8A and 8B. 36
CONSENT AGENDA 37
Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1E as presented. 38
Councilmember Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. 39
40
ITEM ACTION 41
Consideration of Expenditures: 42
A) April 27, 2020 (Check No. 112088 through 112185) in 43
the Amount of $637,430.90. Approved 44
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
2
B) Consider Approval of April 6, 2020 45
Work Session Minutes Approved 46
C) Consider Approval of April 13, 2020 47
Council Meeting Minutes Approved 48
D) Consider Approval of Noise Ordinance Signage Approved 49
E) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 20-37, Approving 50
a Permit for Consumer Firework Sales at Target 51
Store 1448 Approved 52
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 53
2A) Consider Resolution No. 20-43, Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General 54
Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A, in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount 55
of $4,800,000 – Finance Director Cotton reviewed the written staff report. The recommendation is 56
to move forward with the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the approved water tower project. 57
The bonds will be repaid over a period of 15 years. 58
Mayor Rafferty asked if there are important elements about this project that the council should 59
know. Ms. Cotton noted that the council adopted a resolution some time ago allowing the City to 60
pay for work that is done prior to receiving the bond proceeds; additionally there are measures in 61
place recognizing the current market. 62
Terri Heaton, financial consultant with Baker Tilly, reported. She explained that the resolution 63
authorizes a competitve sale on June 8, 2020 but if the market becomes volitale it allo ws for 64
flexibility. Mayor Rafferty asked if there is something to be cautiously looking at? Ms. Heaton 65
noted that the market has been pretty stable for the last few weeks, barring some volitilty tied to 66
certain types of announcements. 67
Council Member Cavegn asked, if the market does become volitale and bonds aren’t sold, what is in 68
place to pay expenses? Ms. Cotton said expenses would be paid with cash on hand, specifically from 69
the trunk utility fund and she is comfortable that could go on for some time. 70
Ms. Heaton noted that, from the bond side, the flexibility would be needed probably only up to two 71
weeks to a month if a delay is necessary. 72
Council Member Ruhland noted that he’s been watching the market closely. He is wondering if 73
there is any connection to what is occuring in the mor tgage based securities market. Ms. Heaton 74
noted twenty year markets and she feels that is back to stable post pandemic; we are in the early days 75
of pandemic, however, and so there could be changes ahead. 76
Council Member Stoesz asked, if there is a delay in construction due to social distancing, would 77
there be an impact on the bonds? Ms. Heaton explained that the City will have up to three years to 78
spend bond proceeds; past that, you can actually spread it out longer if necessary. 79
Council Member Ruhland asked about the interest rate; Ms. Heaton noted 1.93% for fifteen years. 80
Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-43 as presented. Council Member 81
Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 82
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 83
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
3
3A) Consider Resolution No. 20-38, Amending Joint Cooperative Agreement with North 84
Metro Telecommunications Commission – Administrator Karlson explained that the resolution 85
would amend the City’s cooperative agreement with North Metro. He reviewed changes proposed: 86
- Creates one budget instead of two; 87
- Membership – strikes requirements that cities be geographically contiguous; 88
- Voting – allows the number of directors present to constitute a quorum; voting is clarified so 89
as to remove overweighted votes (he noted that votes are normally unanimous); 90
- Powers of Commission – bonds can be payable through peg fees in addition to other sources. 91
Council Member Stoesz, Lino Lakes’ representative on and Chair of the North Metro Board, 92
reported that the agreement was reviewed extensivley by the Board and he feels this is well written; 93
he fully supports the changes proposed. 94
Council Member Lyden moved to approve Resolution No. 20-38 as presented. Council Member 95
Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 96
3B) Consider Resolution No. 20-41, Supporting the Protect Community Television Act, - 97
Administrator Karlson explained that the FCC has ruled that certain non monetary consideration can 98
be subtracted from the franchise fees received by communities. North Metro TV provides a lot of 99
good community programming that is funded by those fees. He recommmends that the City adopt 100
this resolution that supports continuing fees for community programming. 101
Council Member Stoesz remarked that this relates to a federal matter and, while the City of Lino 102
Lakes is small portion of the impact, he understands that this resolution sends a message that he 103
supports. 104
Council Member Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-41 as presented. Council Member 105
Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 106
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 107
4A) Consider Acceptance of Monetary Donation to Lino Lakes Public Safety Canine Unit – 108
Public S afety Director Swenson asked for the council’s approval to accept the donation laid out in 109
his report. The donation comes as a result of the City’s host role in the most recent canine event of 110
this organization. 111
Mayor Rafferty remarked that the event was very successful and he is thankful to the organization 112
for recognizing the City and for the donation. He supports the City’s canine unit; it’s a value to the 113
community. 114
Council Member Ruhland asked, what is the cost to train a canine? Director Swenson replied that 115
the cost of the dog and training for the most recent City canine was about $12,000 to $15,000. 116
Council Member Ruhland moved to accept the donation as presented. Council Member Lyden 117
seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 118
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 119
5A) Consider Resolution No. 20-42, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Construction Contract 120
for Lift Station No. 5 Force Main Repair – City Engineer Hankee explained the route of the sewer lines 121
in the Pheasant Hills neighborhood. A section of the line has been dug up for repairs in the past few 122
weeks and another section a couple years ago. Crews noted corrosion of those lines. She pointed out 123
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
4
recent repairs and implications on a nearby trail. The watermain was also repaired and corrosion was 124
noted. Staff is concerned about the condition of the force main that serves a significant area of the City 125
and have discussed options. Staff is now recommending a directional drilling project to address the 126
situation. She noted the proposed project budget that includes extra funding for some exploratory work. 127
She explained the proposed project schedule. 128
Mayor Rafferty asked if this has anything to do with what goes down the sewer? Ms. Hankee said that 129
while there is additional clogging in certain areas that is probably related to , in this case, staff believes the 130
break relates to a corroded pipe. 131
Utility Supervisor Williams noted that staff is performing inspections on a regular basis to prevent larger 132
problems and there is an increase in certain things being flushed, but that isn’t related to this situation. 133
Council Member Lyden asked if this failure of the pipe is premature and, if so, related to what. City 134
Engineer Hankee, on the question of premature failure, said she’d have to evaluate that question further. 135
She noted that the life of the proposed new pipe is fifty to seventy years. There does seem to be more 136
failure in certain soils. 137
Utility Supervisor Williams added information on the new pipe type and it’s wear; the metal pipe that is 138
currently present is less resistant to certain corrosives. The new pipe is made of the best material for the 139
soil where it would be buryed. 140
Council Member Cavegn asked how much more of the metal pipe exists in the city. Also he’s concerned 141
about the funding source. Mr. Williams noted that this particular pipe is unique and he doesn’t see this 142
situation at other lift stations in the City at least for several years. Ms. Cotton noted that the project would 143
be paid from the Water Operating Fund which has over $6,000,000; those funds are intended to replace 144
existing infrastructure. 145
Council Member Cavegn asked if there is any expectation of loss of City funding either through property 146
taxes unpaid or people not paying utility bills. Ms. Cotton said she is monitoring the utility funds and isn’t 147
seeing an issue; on the property taxes, the City’s general fund reserve is available for a full six months of 148
expenses. 149
Council Member Stoesz asked about the resident impact; will there be service outages. Mr. Williams said 150
there should not be any service outages; further this is the least invasive type of repair to road surfaces. 151
Council Member Stoesz asked about communication to the residents. Ms. Hankee said there could be 152
mailings or door hangers; the homeowners association will be notified. 153
Council Member Stoesz asked if WSB & Associates will be doing the inspections. Ms. Hankee said staff 154
hasn’t gotten to the support level and she suspects that Mr. Williams will be able to do much of that. 155
Mayo r Rafferty thanked Mr. Williams for his good work; he’s unfortunately had to deal with a couple of 156
large breaks within a short period. He added that this is a proactive approach proposed by the City in a 157
situation of failure based on staff review and recommendation. 158
Council Member Lyden moved to approve Resolution No. 20-42 as presented. Council Member 159
Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 160
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 161
6A) Item 6A regarding Watermark 3rd Addition had been removed from the agenda. 162
6B) Consider Resolution No. 20-39, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Contract, City Hall 163
Parking Lot Fog Seal – City Engineer Hankee explained that the City Hall parking lot is in need of 164
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
5
maintenance to preserve the surface. Staff has determined the best approach at this time is crack and 165
fog sealing. She was asked to contact the YMCA to see if they would like to join in a project and she 166
is checking with them. A low quote, funding and schedule were reviewed. 167
Mayor Rafferty asked what area is included. Ms. Hankee said it includes the drive to the doors, the 168
parking lot and the back of the lot by the Public Safety Department. 169
Council Member Stoesz asked if there can be more parking allowed (through striping) to accommodate 170
the many people who drop off at the day care center. Ms. Hankee said that staff did review striping 171
and found that t he way it is currently designed doesn’t leave much room for modification. There will 172
be an additional handicap parking spot on the north end of the lot. The front striping will remain the 173
same. 174
Council Member Cavegn asked if this should be delayed with less traffic at City Hall. Ms. Hankee 175
explained that staff has been trying to get the project going for several years and it fits into the overall 176
program this year; there is concern in delaying infrastructure projects and funding is in place currently 177
for the project. She added that a low traffic period is a good time for this type of project. 178
Public Services Director DeGardner remarked that this project could add another five to seven years to 179
the existing surface; otherwise a full mill and overlay may be required as early as next year. 180
Mayor Rafferty discussed timing and asked about the identified contractor. Ms. Hankee said they have 181
a good record. 182
Council Member Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-39 as presented. Council Member 183
Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 184
6C) Consider Resolution No. 20-40, Authorizing 2020 Regional Solicitation Grant Submittal, 185
Main Street (CSAH 14) Multiuse Trail from Lino Lakes Elementary School to I-35W Overpass – 186
Community Development Director Grochala first noted that the City’s future plans include extension of 187
the trail on the north side of the City. He noted the history of the trail to date. The resolution 188
authorizes staff to seek a grant through a funding program that happens every two years. If approved, 189
the trail extension project planned would be covered up to 80%. He explained how the remainder is 190
planned to be funded. An extension of this trail would provide a good addition on the north side of the 191
city and he has received letters of support that will be submitted with the application. The City 192
received assistance from WSB & Associates on completing an application and would work with Anoka 193
County on a submission. Grant notification is probably in September. 194
Council Member Lyden noted that he is excited about the possibility of this project but he does see that 195
there is some movement from the north to south side of the street. Mr. Grochala remarked that there 196
would be a safety measure at a crossing. 197
Council Member Stoesz asked if there would be an impact to snowmobile trails and Mr. Grochala said it 198
will be investigated. 199
Council Member Cavegn asked if the trail could instead go north to south side at Lake Drive where 200
there is traffic control? Mr. Grochala indicated there could be wetland impacts but such an alignment 201
could be reviewed. 202
Council Member Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-40 as presented. Council Member 203
Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 204
6D) Consider Resolution No. 20-22, Approving Amendments to the Designated Municipal 205
State Aid Street System – City Engineer Hankee noted the City’s designation as a Municipal State 206
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
6
Aid (MSA) city. There are certain streets within the City that are designated as MSA streets eligible 207
for MSA funds. Staff is recommending adding the following roadways to the list: Town Center 208
Parkway; Village Drive; Woods Edge Drive. 209
Council Member Lyden remarked that the new streets aren’t necessarily ones that are used by a large 210
number of residents. Ms. Hankee noted the current MSA designated roadways in the City and 211
requirements for MSA roadways. The majority of the high volume streets are County MSA roads. 212
Council Member Cavegn asked if Apollo Drive east of Lake Drive should be designated? Ms. 213
Hankee concurred that would be a good addition but it is disqualified as a dead end street. 214
Council Member Stoesz mo ved to approve Resolution No. 20-42 as presented. Council Member 215
Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 216
217
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 218
219
There was no Unfinished Business. 220
221
NEW BUSINESS 222
223
Items 8A and 8B, Closed Session regarding Employee Misconduct, were removed from the agenda. 224
225
ADJOURN 226
227
Council Member Ruhland noted that he’s heard that cities are experiencing increases in crimes such 228
as domestic abuse; what’s the situation in Lino Lakes? Public Safety Director Swenson remarked 229
that there are some increases being seen in other cities but thankfully Lino Lakes has not seen that. 230
231
There being no further business, Council Member Ruhland moved to adjourn at 8:07 p.m. Council 232
Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 233
234
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on May 11, 2020. 235
236
237
238
239
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 240
241
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES May 4, 2020
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION 3
4
DATE : May 4, 2020 5
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 6
TIME ENDED : 6:20 p.m. 7
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Ruhland, Lyden, Cavegn, Stoesz 8
and Mayor Rafferty 9
MEMBERS ABSENT : none 10
11
Staff members present: City Clerk Julie Bartell; Finance Director Sarah Cotton 12
13
Anoka County Assessor Staff present: Scott Schutz, Assessment Compliance Coordinator, Shawn Halligan 14
(Residential Appraiser) & John Leone (Commercial Appraiser). 15
16
City Board of Appeal members who had completed training for the meeting were Councilmembers Lyden and 17
Ruhland. 18
19
Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order; all members were present. 20
21
The council had reviewed the official board report (on file) at a recent work session. 22
23
There were no property owners wishing to speak. 24
25
Anoka County Residential Appraiser Halligan addressed the board. He’s had 37 calls this year, the 26
majority of which have been settled. For the calls that have come late in the process, he has told the 27
property owners that he would read the property into the record that they would retain the right to 28
come to the County Board of Appeal. Staff will work with them over the next few weeks to address 29
their concerns but they can go forward to that board if they choose. He noted that a list of property 30
owners was submitted to the City Clerk and they’d like those included in the record so as to retain that 31
right of future appeal. Mr. Halligan added that there were 410 sales in the City of which 216 were 32
qualified and used for study. The market value of City properties is included in the board report. 33
There were just over 100 new homes constructed. 34
35
Anoka County Commercial Appraiser Leone said he has received two calls and those have been 36
addressed. There were only three sales (one commercial and two industrial) this year. He noted that 37
as usual twenty percent of the properties were reviewed. 38
39
Mayor Rafferty asked about outstanding concerns that the County has heard from property owners. 40
Mr. Halligan noted the number of owners with which he has reached resolution. There are about five 41
outstanding where they have not and the County will continue working with them. He noted that 42
taxation notices were delivered to the property owners later than usual. 43
44
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES May 4, 2020
DRAFT
2
Councilmember Ruhland asked what took so long to get county taxes confirmed this year. Mr. 45
Schutz noted that the County has a new system (not updated since 2006) and it took a bit to get the 46
bugs out. Councilmember Ruhland noted that he’s heard some criticism of the website and he 47
wonders if the County is responding. County staff noted that the website is the crux of the upgrade 48
and they are still working at achieving the best product possible. Councilmember Ruhland confirmed 49
that the process for the County Board of Appeal is similar to the City. 50
51
Councilmember Lyden thanked county staff for their work and he hopes that they can reach resolution 52
with those property owners who have outstanding concerns. He also noted that he personally had 53
contacted the county assessor’s office with a question on his property taxes and he was served well. 54
55
Mayor Rafferty noted that the website to view property taxes is different. He has noticed that 56
information is provided differently. Will there be updates to past r ecords (sales, mortgages) as there 57
was in the past. County staff recommended that Mayor Rafferty contact Alex Guggenberger for 58
specific website questions. Mayor Rafferty explained that the councilmembers may occasionally use 59
the site to get background for property concerns that come up. 60
61
Councilmember Stoesz noted that county staff mentioned that there were 100 homes constructed in 62
the city in 2019 but he noticed a higher figure (165) in the report. Mr. Schutz explained that the 63
figure he gave (100) was just an estimate. 64
65
Mayor Rafferty asked if the new construction figure is established by permit being issued or certificate 66
of occupancy. Mr. Schutz explained that it would be closer to the permit or something like the 67
foundation being laid. 68
69
The properties listed on Exhibit A attached to these minutes were read into the record: 70
71
Motion by Cavegn to accept the referrals to the Anoka County Board of Equalization as indicated. 72
Council Member Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion adopted: Yeas, 5; Nays none. 73
74
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on May 11, 2020 75
76
77
78
79
80
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 81
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Julie Bartell, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2020
TOPIC: Pro Rata Fee Refunds and Payment Schedule Amendment for
Annual Business Licenses
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City issues annual licenses for intoxicating beverage sales and the renewal date for these
licenses is July 1, 2020. The restaurants and bars in the City that hold these licenses have
been greatly impacted by Governor Walz’s mandated closures related to the COVID 19 virus.
Since these establishments have been mostly unable to sell on-sale beverages, staff has been
looking at measures that could provide some type of refund or fee consideration.
Minnesota Statutes provide that cities may refund a pro rata share of an annual license fee when
a business ceases to be lawful for a reason other than a license revocation.
Staff is asking that the City Council consider the following:
- Pro rata refund of license fees for months when establishments were not able to be open
for a majority of days in the month due to the Governor’s emergency orders;
- The city code currently requires that all applications shall be accompanied by payment
in full of the license fee. It is proposed that one half of the license fee be required upon
application for the coming license period and one half be due after six months.
- Since it is uncertain exactly how long these establishments will be mostly unable to sell
beverages, any refund would be considered as a credit to future fees.
- The refund and split fee option would apply only to On-Sale Liquor, On-Sale Wine, On-
Sale Beer, On-Sale Club, On-Sale Taproom and Sunday Sales licenses. Investigation
fees are not included.
- The changes proposed relate only to the current emergency situation.
Other Business Licenses. Other licenses issued by the City that have been impacted by the
current emergency situation are Massage, Peddler and some Tobacco. Staff proposes that the
Tobacco and Massage licenses be included in the refund and split fee option. Peddler licenses
are issued for a period of six months; it is proposed that the impacted months for this activity be
allowed as an extension to their license period.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests direction from the council on proceeding with proposed measures to address
licensing in the current emergency situation.
ATTACHMENTS
List of Business Licenses
License Type Business Name Type of License
12 Month Fee for
License
Liquor American Legion On-Sale Club/Sunday $300/$200
Liquor The Tavern on Main On-Sale/Sunday/Off-Sale $4,500/$200/$200
Liquor Trapper's Bar & Grill On-Sale/Sunday $4,500/$200
Liquor Chomonix Golf Course On-Sale/Sunday $4,500/$200
Liquor Fiesta Cancun On-Sale/Sunday $4,500/$200
Liquor Don Julio On-Sale/Sunday $4,500/$200
Liquor El Zocala Grill On-Sale/Sunday $4,500/$200
Liquor Hammerheart TR On-Sale/Sunday $500/$200
Liquor Chili Sushi & Thai Beer/Wine $300/$500
Tobacco Chomonix Golf Course Tobacco $50
Tobacco Lino Lakes Tobacco Tobacco $50
Tobacco Ecig Crib Tobacco $50
Massage Heather's Healing Hands Enterprise/2 Individual $200/$50/$50
Massage Allure Salon Enterprise/1 Individual $200/$50
Massage Self Essential Therapeutic Enterprise/1 Individual $200/$50
Massage Linnea Dufresne Enterprise/1 Individual $200/$50
Massage Monarch Massage Enterprise/1 Individual $200/$50
Peddler Pro Star Tree Care Peddler/Solicitor
Approved to start
4/15/2020 - Check
Cashed - Extend Date or
Refund $250
Peddler Edward Jones D Chrzanowski Peddler/Solicitor
Approved to start
4/15/2020 - Check
Cashed - Extend Date or
Refund $250
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2020
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution 20-45 Approving Allina Ambulance as
the Primary Ambulance Service for the City of Lino Lakes
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
On June 1, 2020 the ambulance service providing primary services will change as determined by
current Emergency Medical Service Regulatory Board (EMSRB) Primary Service Area (PSA)
maps. As a result of existing PSA overlaps, the City of Lino Lakes is able to choose between two
ambulance service providers. Staff is recommending that Allina Ambulance service be designated
as the primary ambulance provider for the City of Lino Lakes.
BACKGROUND
During 2018, 2019, and 2020, Staff have regularly update the Council on concerns with
ambulance services in Lino Lakes, shortcomings of the current regulatory authority over
ambulance in Minnesota, and the lack of local control. These issues were recently discussed at the
December 2, 2019, December 9, 2019, March 2, 2020, and May 4, 2020 meetings with Council.
Staff has learned that the entire City of Lino Lakes is covered by what the EMSRB refers to as
“PSA overlap”. This means that when the PSA maps were created two ambulance providers own
a PSA that covers our community. We know that MHealth Fairview (formally Fairview) as well
as Allina Ambulance own a PSA that includes Lino Lakes. This has occurred in other areas of the
state and when there is ambulance PSA overlap the local jurisdiction has the ability to choose
between the ambulance providers that own the PSAs covering their community. I have attached
two maps (Anoka County – Allina #0057 and Anoka County – Forest Lake #0084) obtained from
the EMSRB which shows this overlap.
Dating back to April of 2019, staff has met with both MHealth Fairview and Allina to gain the
needed information on their respective ambulance services, medical dispatching capabilities,
medical direction, and available EMS training for our staff.
Based on this information, staff is recommending that we move forward with Allina Ambulance
service effective June 1, 2020 as primary ambulance provider for the City of Lino Lakes.
• Allina has a long standing operation in Anoka County with many positive comments
regarding their ambulance services from other Anoka County jurisdictions currently being
serviced by Allina Ambulance.
• Allina is currently certified as a secondary medical dispatch center and has invested in an
interface with Anoka County Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) software. This has
streamlined the ambulance dispatching process for other Anoka County communities
resulting in faster dispatching of ambulances.
• Allina has a large operation in Anoka County and will be adding one ambulance to
provided services in PSA #0084 once Lino Lakes moves to their service. This will provide
a high level of coverage with a robust number of ambulances to back-up coverage during
times of peak demand for ambulance services in our community.
• Allina has agreed to house an ambulance crew out of Lino Lakes Fire Station #1.
• Allina will provide medical direction and training to all police and fire staff. The
agreement for these services is attached for your review.
Attached to this staff report is a letter dated May 7, 2020 from Allina Vice President, Operations
Susan Long regarding the activities and commitments of Allina related to providing ambulance
services to the Lino Lakes community.
Allina Ambulance will be leasing space for one ambulance and crew at Lino Lakes Fire Station
#1. Allina Ambulance will pay the City of Lino Lakes $700 per month as part of this lease
agreement. This lease is attached for Council consideration.
As required by law, we are required to have an agreement in place to receive medical direction
from a Medical Doctor. Staff has met with staff from Allina to develop an agreement for medical
direction services as well as on-going medical training for all staff. This medical training is
required as part of the First Responder, EMT, and Paramedics re-certification and re-licensure.
This agreement is also attached for Council consideration.
In order for the Anoka County Dispatch Center to begin to dispatching Allina Ambulance for
medical calls for service within the City of Lino Lakes, Council must approve Resolution 20-45
designating Allina Ambulance as the primary service provider and directing Anoka County
Dispatch to dispatch Allina Ambulance. Resolution 20-45 is attached for Council consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution 20-45 designating Allina Ambulance as the primary
ambulance service for the City of Lino Lakes. Staff further recommends Council approve the
lease agreement and medical direction/medical training agreements with Allina.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 20-45
Lease Agreement with Allina Ambulance
Allina Medical Direction & Training Agreement
EMSRB Ambulance PSA #0084 Map
EMSRB Ambulance PSA #0057 Map
Allina letter dated May 7, 2020
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-45
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ALLINA AMBULANCE AS THE PRIMARY
AMBULANCE SERVICE FOR CITY OF LINO LAKES
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board (EMSRB) is
empowered to regulate and assign a Primary Service Area (PSA) for all ambulance services in
the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, EMSRB PSA maps #0087 and #0057 demonstrate an overlap that covers the entire
City of Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, when ambulance PSA overlap occurs, local jurisdictions are authorized to select
the ambulance service that meets the local jurisdictions ambulance needs; and
WHEREAS, staff has conducted extensive research on the topic to determine which ambulance
provider is best suited to provide high quality services in the City of Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Dispatch Center requires a formal action by the governing body
of local jurisdiction to change ambulance provider dispatching protocols.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City o f Lino Lakes,
Minnesota establishes Allina Ambulance Service as the primary ambulance provider for City of
Lino Lakes, effective June 1, 2020.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember
_____________and was duly seconded by Councilmember ___________ and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease"), is made and entered into this 1st day of June,
2020, by and between the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipal corporation
("Lessor"), and Allina Health System , a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ("Lessee")
(collectively "Parties").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Lessor is the owner of real property located at 7741 Lake Drive, Lino
Lakes, MN on which Fire Station No. 1 is located ("Station l"); and
WHEREAS, Lessee desires to lease portions of Station 1 to store and operate its
ambulances; and
WHEREAS, Lessor is willing to lease to Lessee upon such terms and conditions as
are expressed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, Lessor and Lessee hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. LEASED PREMISES: Subject to, and upon the terms, provisions, and
conditions hereinafter set forth, Lessor does hereby lease and demise unto
Lessee, the following ("Leased Premises" or "Premises"):
Station 1: Lessee shall not have any dedicated leased space in Station 1, but
shall have the non-exclusive right to use the following areas of the first floor:
dayroom, kitchen, restrooms, dispatch/staging room, decontamination
restroom as needed, and the hallways, as highlighted on the attached Exhibit
A. Lessee shall also have an exclusive the right to use the apparatus bay for
one ambulance, with immediate emergency access to an exit (specific
location to be assigned by the Public Safety Director), as well as two exterior
parking stalls for Lessee's employees. The use of all areas is subject to the
rules, regulations and policies of Lessor, which may change from time to
time. There is no leased space above the first floor
2. TERM OF LEASE: The term of this Lease shall commence as of June 1st,
2020, and shall continue for a term of three years.
3. EARLY TERMINATION OF LEASE: The Lease may be terminated
without cause prior to the end of the term by either Party by providing 180
days written notice to the other Party without penalty. Upon termination of
this Lease, Lessee will promptly and peaceably surrender the Premises to
Lessor in substantially the same condition existing on the commencement
date of the Lease, ordinary and reasonable use, damage and wear excepted.
Lessor acknowledges that Lessee does not have exclusive use of the Leased
2
Premises and is not responsible for any damage or use of the Leased
Premises by other parties.
4. RENT: Lessee shall pay to Lessor Rent for the use of the Leased Premises in
the amount of $700.00 per month. Rent shall be payable in advance on or
before the first day of each and every month of this Lease.
If Lessee fails to pay Rent after the 20th business day of the month in which
such payment is due, Lessee shall automatically be assessed and shall pay,
as additional Rent, a late charge equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the
amount of such late payment. Lessor reserves the right to increase Rent by
providing Lessee with written notice at least 240 days in advance of the
effective date of the increase.
5. MAINTENANCE:
a. Lessor shall be responsible for maintenance and repair of all structural
components, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, electrical, plumbing
and mechanical systems of the Premises.
b. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining the exterior and surrounding
areas, including lawn care and snow removal.
c. Lessee shall maintain and clean the dedicated leased area within Station 1
(ambulance day room), and shall otherwise clean any mess or clutter
created by Lessee in all other areas to which it has access (including
dishes, counters, refrigerator, etc.).
d. Lessee shall be responsible for all damage arising out of its
employees’ use of the Leased Premises, ordinary wear and tear
excepted.
6. VISITOR AND PET RESTRICTIONS: Lessee shall not allow anyone
other than its own personnel into the Premises unless authorized in
advance by the Public Safety Director. Lessee shall not allow any pets or
other non-service animals into the Premises. The Lessor acknowledges
the Lessee does own a service animal which may visit the Premises with
the crew at times.
7. LESSOR PROPERTY: Lessee acknowledges that this Lease does not grant
Lessee unfettered access to Lessor's tools, equipment, furniture or fixtures
outside of the leased and common areas. Lessee shall not use, borrow or take
any Lessor tools or equipment without express prior authorization
from the Public Safety Director. Tools and equipment include hand tools,
power tools, audio visual equipment, computers, and firefighting and EMT
apparatus and supplies.
8. INSURANCE: During the term of this Lease, Lessor shall obtain and
maintain liability and property damage insurance for the entire property.
3
Lessee shall, at its own cost, maintain personal property and contents
insurance, as well as maintain commercial general liability insurance in an
amount sufficient to cover the liability limits of Minn. Stat. § 466.04, as
amended. Lessee shall also maintain automobile liability insurance with a
combined single limit of $1,500,000 for bodily injury and property damage
with coverage for all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles. Lessor shall be
named as an "additional insured" on commercial general liability insurance
maintained by Lessee that relates to the Premises or its use.
All insurance required to be maintained by Lessee under this Lease shall be
effected under valid and enforceable policies issued by a reputable
insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota or
issued under a program of self-insurance. Not less than 10 days prior to the
Lease term, Lessee shall deliver to Lessor certificates of all insurance
required to be maintained hereunder. Should Lessee’s policies be cancelled
before the expiration date thereof, notice will be delivered in accordance
with the policy provisions.
9. INDEMNITY: Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Lessor harmless
from and against any and all claims, actions, liability, and damages of every
kind and nature, and from and against all costs and expenses, including
reasonable attorney’s fees, to the extent proximately caused by the
negligence or intentional tort of Lessee, its agents, employees, licensees, or
invitees, in or about Station 1. In the event of any action or proceeding
brought against Lessor, by reason of any such claim, upon notice from
Lessor, Lessee covenants to defend such action or proceeding by counsel
satisfactory to Lessor.
Lessor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Lessee and its directors,
officers, employees, agents and representatives harmless from and against all
loss, liability, damages and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees)
caused by any act or omission of Lessor, its officers, employees, agents,
invitees and representatives, except to the extent such loss, liability, damage
or expense is covered by insurance maintained by Lessor.
Lessor and Lessee hereby waive against the other any claims, liabilities or
damages arising from or caused by any hazard covered by the insurance
maintained or required by the waiving party.
10. NON-LIABILITY OF LESSOR: Except in the event of negligence or an
intentional act by Lessor, its agents, employees, or contractors, Lessor shall not
be liable for any loss or damage resulting from or caused by any failure to
furnish heat, electricity, water, gas, air conditioning or sprinkler system, nor for
any consequential damage arising from interruption of any utility or services.
4
11. ASSIGNMENT: Lessee shall not assign or transfer any of its rights under this
Lease or sublease any part of the Premises.
12. DEFAULT:
a. Should any voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy be filed by or
against Lessee, Lessor may, by written notice to Lessee, immediately
terminate this Lease and terminate Lessee's right to possession of the
Premises. If Lessee does not voluntarily quit the Premises upon receipt of
notice of termination, Lessor may, in its discretion, recover sole
possession of the Premises in an eviction (unlawful detainer) proceeding,
and recover from Lessee all attorney fees, costs, and expenses relating to
such proceeding. In addition, Lessor shall be entitled to recover all
damages and other claims arising prior to the date of termination,
including without limitation, all rent due through the end of the month of
termination, damages, and attorney fees.
b. If Lessee defaults in the payment of Rent, and such default continues for
20 days after Lessor's written notice thereof to Lessee, or Lessee defaults
in the prompt and full performance of any other provision of this Lease
and such default continues for 30 days after Lessor's written notice
thereof to Lessee, or if Lessee makes an assignment for the benefit of
creditors, or if a receiver is appointed for the property of Lessee, or if
Lessee abandons the Premises, then, and in any such event, Lessor may
by written notice to Lessee, immediately terminate this Lease and
terminate Lessee's right to possession of the Premises. If Lessee does
not voluntarily quit the Premises upon receipt of notice of termination,
Lessor, may, in its discretion, recover sole possession of the Premises in
an eviction (unlawful detainer) proceeding, and recover from Lessee all
attorney fees, costs, and expenses relating to such proceeding. In
addition, Lessor shall be entitled to recover all damages and pursue all
claims arising prior to the date of termination, including without
limitation all rent due through the end of the month of termination,
damages, and attorney fees.
13. RIGHT OF ENTRY: Lessor and its employees or agents shall have the right,
without any diminution of Rent, additional Rent or other charges payable
hereunder by Lessee, to enter the Premises at all reasonable times and upon
reasonable notice for the purpose of inspection, cleaning, repairing, altering or
improving the same or the Premises, but nothing contained in this provision
shall be construed so as to impose any obligation on Lessor to make any
repairs, alterations or improvements.
14. USE BY LESSEE: Lessee agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, orders,
rules, and regulations promulgated by all government agencies which relate to
the use, condition, or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee. Lessee warrants that
it will abide by Lessor's workplace policies and the Premises will remain
5
tobacco and chemical free. Lessee acknowledges and agrees that Lessor has the
exclusive authority to reasonably modify and/or change its rules and regulations
at any time.
Lessee shall not make any alterations or improvements to the Premises
without prior written consent of Lessor. All alterations and improvements to
the Premises and fixtures shall become the property of Lessor. Trade fixtures
may be removed by the Lessee.
1. SAFETY AND SECURITY: Lessee is solely responsible for the safety and
security of its employees, guests, and invitees while they are on the Premises.
The Lessee is also responsible for assuring building security of their designated
areas while entering, exiting and based at the Premise as well as the
confidentiality of any door codes, keys, entry devices and the like used to gain
access into the Premise The Lessee is not responsible for others in the building
related to the Lessors activities on the Premise.
2. SIGNS: Lessee agrees that no exterior or interior window or door sign,
advertising media, or window or door lettering or placards or other signs or
advertising materials shall be installed, erected, attached or affixed to any
portion of the interior or exterior of the Premises or the buildings, without the
express prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
3. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: If the Premises are damaged
or destroyed by fire or other casualty, Lessee shall have the right to terminate
this Lease provided it gives written notice thereof to Lessor within 60 days
after such damage or destruction, unless such fire, damage, or destruction is
proved to be the fault of Lessee. Lessee’s rent shall be suspended from
date the Building was no longer available as outline in section 1.
4. SUCCESSORS: It is agreed that the covenants, terms and conditions of
this Lease shall extend, apply to and firmly bind the heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties.
5. SEVERABILITY: If any term, condition, or provision of this Lease or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be
held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder thereof and the
application of such term, provision and condition to persons or
circumstances other than those as to whom it shall be held invalid or
unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and this Lease and all terms,
provisions and conditions hereof shall, in all other aspects, continue to be
effective and to be complied with to the fullest extent permitted by law.
6. RELATIONSHIP: This Lease does not create the relationship of principal
6
and agent, partnership, joint venture, or any other association between
Lessor and Lessee.
7. CONSTRUCTION OF LEASE: It is agreed that this Lease shall be
governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Lease shall constitute the entire agreement
relating to the lease of the Premises between the Parties. Any prior
understanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Lease
shall not be binding upon either party except to the extent incorporated in this
Lease.
[The remainder of this page left blank.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto caused these presents to be validly
executed in their respective names, as of the day and year first above-written.
CITY OF LINO LAKES ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM
By: __________________________ By: ____________________________
Its: __________________________ Its: ____________________________
Date: ________________________ Date: __________________________
Exhibit A
To Lease Agreement between City of Lino
Lakes and Allina Health System.
Lino Lakes Fire Station
No. 1 7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes , MN 55014
Page 1
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES AGREEMENT 6-1-2020
This Agreement is made and entered into 6-1-20 (“Effective Date”) by and between Allina Health
System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services (“AHEMS”), a Minnesota nonprofit
corporation having principal office at 167 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 and Lino Lakes
Public Safety (“First Responder”) having principal office at 640 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes,
MN, 55014.
WHEREAS, First Responder is an entity engaged in providing emergency response, care, and
treatment services to patients in its geographic service area; and
WHEREAS, AHEMS is a licensed Education Institution in First Responder’s service area; and
WHEREAS, AHEMS has the personnel and resources to meet the requirements of Minn. Stat. §
144E.265, and to provide medical direction and support services to First Responder; and
WHEREAS, First Responder desires to engage AHEMS to provide Services (as defined below) in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises specified below, the
parties agree as follows.
1. Services. Beginning on the Effective Date, AHEMS will assign individuals to provide, and
will provide, the Services set forth in Exhibit A (the “Services”), attached hereto and incorporated
herein.
2. Qualifications. AHEMS will ensure that each individual it assigns to provide the Service is
qualified, in terms of education and training to provide the Services, in accordance with all federal,
state, and local statutes and regulations, and as may be further specified in Exhibit A and maintains in
good standing and without limitations, exceptions or conditions, at all times while performing the
Services, any license, registration, or certification necessary to provide the Services.
3. Fees and Payment. In exchange for the Services, First Responder will make payment of the
amount due under this Agreement to AHEMS in a timely manner in response to receipt of an invoice
supported by adequate documentation. First Responder will pay AHEMS for the Services as set forth
in Exhibit B. If any of the fees owed are paid on a prospective annual basis, if AHEMS terminates this
Agreement prior to the expiration of a full year term, AHEMS will refund to First Responder a prorate
portion of such annual fee(s) paid for Services not performed as of the date of termination. For all other
fees owed under this Agreement, in the event of early termination First Responder will make payment
only for the Services performed prior to the effective date of termination.
4. Use of Space. Intentionally left blank.
5. Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and
continue for 2 years, unless earlier terminated. This Agreement may be terminated by either party for
any reason upon 30 days’ prior written notice or by mutual agreement of the parties.
Page 2
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
6. Indemnification. AHEMS will defend, hold harmless, and indemnify First Responder, its
officers, directors, employees, and agents from any claims, liabilities, or expenses (including
reasonable attorney’s fees) arising from or relating to AHEMS’s acts or omissions in connection with
this Agreement. First Responder will defend, hold harmless, and indemnify AHEMS, its officers,
directors, employees, and agents from any claims, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable
attorney’s fees) arising from or relating to First Responder’s acts or omissions in connection with this
Agreement.
7. Insurance. AHEMS agrees to maintain such policies of insurance, self-insurance, or
combinations thereof in amounts not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $3,000,000.00
aggregate. First Responder agrees to provide and maintain insurance with limits of not less than
$1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $3,000,000.00 annual aggregate unless such entity is governmental
entity. If First Responder is a government entity, First Responder agrees to provide and maintain
liability insurance as set out in applicable state law.
8. Excluded Provider. Both parties hereby certify that neither it nor its employees, directors,
officers, agents, or subcontractors are presently excluded, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to
participate in Federal Health Care Programs or in federal procurement or non-procurement programs,
and have not been convicted of a criminal offense within the scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a). Each
party will immediately give written notice to the other of any debarment, exclusion, or other event that
makes such party, or an employee, director, officer, agent, or subcontractor of such party, ineligible to
participate in Federal Health Care Programs or in federal procurement or non-procurement programs.
9. Illegality. If, as determined by agreement of the parties’ counsel, or, if the parties’ counsel
cannot agree, by a nationally recognized law firm with expertise in health care regulation jointly
selected by the parties, any provision of this Agreement violates any applicable federal or state statute,
rule, regulation, or administrative or judicial decision (collectively, the “Law”), then either party may
give notice to the other to amend this Agreement solely to comply with the Law and the parties will
negotiate in good faith with respect thereto. If they cannot agree on the terms and conditions of any
such amendment within 15 days after such notice is given, then either party may terminate this
Agreement immediately upon notice to the other without further liability, but, if the implementation of
the Law is stayed, the right to amend or terminate the Agreement will also be stayed for the same period
of time. When a question arises as to whether this Agreement complies with the Law, and before a
determination is made, either party may suspend payments under the Agreement pending amendment
or termination.
10. Independent Contractors. AHEMS including its employees, or agents, is an independent
contractor of First Responder and nothing in this Agreement will be construed to create an
employer/employee or joint venture relationship between First Responder and AHEMS or its employees,
or agents.
11. Notices. Any notice pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing and must be personally
delivered, sent by email, or sent by certified mail, addressed to the parties at the addresses below or at
such other address as they specify in written notice. Notices are effective upon personal delivery or
when sent by e-mail or certified mail.
Page 3
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
If to First Responder: John Swenson __ If to AHEMS: Susan Long
Public Safety Director_ 167 Grand Avenue
640 Town Center Parkway_ St. Paul, MN 55102
Lino Lakes, MN 55014_ Susan.long@allina.com
Jswenson@linolakes.us
12. Miscellaneous. Neither party may assign, subcontract, or transfer its rights hereunder without the
other party’s prior written consent. Nothing in this Agreement will create any obligations by AHEMS
or First Responder to any person or entity not a party to this Agreement, including any individuals
employed by or under contract with AHEMS or First Responder. This Agreement, together with its
exhibits and attachments, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the
subject matter, and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, promises, and representations
made by either party to the other concerning the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement
may be amended only upon mutual written agreement of the parties. If a court of competent jurisdiction
holds any provision of this Agreement invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will
nonetheless be enforceable. If such court determines that any provision of this Agreement is held to be
overbroad as written, such provision will be deemed amended to narrow its application to the extent
necessary to make the provision enforceable according to applicable law and enforced as amended.
The failure of any party to insist on the performance of any provision of this Agreement and to exercise
any rights hereunder will not be construed as a waiver of future performance of any such provision or
the future exercise of such right.
13. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Minnesota, without reference to conflict of laws principles.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as follows:
ALLINA HEALTH LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
By ____________________________ By ____________________________
Title ____________________________ Title ____________________________
Dated ____________________________ Dated ____________________________
Page 4
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
EXHIBIT A
Services
AHEMS will designate a contact person whom First Responder may contact to arrange for the
provision of Services. First Responder will make all efforts to provide reasonable advance notice of
its need for any of the Services and AHEMS will make all commercially reasonable efforts to procure
resources necessary to deliver the Services, provided, however, that with the exception of Medical
Direction services (if applicable) AHEMS will have no obligation to provide the Services if AHEMS
is unable to procure necessary resources or personnel to furnish the Services. Services provided
pursuant to this Agreement include the following:
1. Medical Direction
a) AHEMS agrees to provide medical director services to First Responder to support First
Responder’s emergency medical program. Medical Director services will include:
(i) Use of AHEMS protocols;
(ii) Medical direction oversight by the AHEMS Medical Director or such other qualified
physician as AHEMS may contract with from time-to-time for such services;
b) As a prerequisite of condition to AHEMS providing the Medical Director services
contemplated herein, the First Responder agrees that it will at all times during the term of
this Agreement:
(i) Operate under AHEMS services protocols;
(ii) Utilize only trained Paramedics, EMTs, EMRs, and/or those trained and privileged
to provide direct medical care;
(iii) Consult with the AHEMS coordinator and/or Medical Director on major equipment
purchases.
c) First Responder will compensate AHEMS for Medical Direction Services in the amount of
$200.00 per year in addition to the training cost.
2. Education and Training.
a) AHEMS will provide the following training to First Responder personnel: Allina Health
EMS will provide 2 separate training sessions of 4 hours per session. Each session will be
given on 2 separate occasions for a total of 4, 4 hour training sessions per year for two years.
Due to department size of approximately 40 personnel, 2 Allina instructors will be
presenting the classes to maintain approximate 10:1 student instructor ratio. If classes grow
beyond instructor span of control additional fees may be required to adequately cover class
sizes. See Exhibit B for training locations and schedules per site.
b) AHEMS will provide training supplies, including disposables. First Responder will
reimburse AHEMS for such supplies in the amount of $100 (included in training site fee).
3. On-Scene Restocking. To the extent permitted by applicable law, AHEMS will provide First
Responder with the supplies and drugs necessary to replace those used by First Responder’s
personnel in the treatment and care of a patient on scene before such patient is transported or
treated by AHEMS emergency medical professionals. If on-scene replacement is not possible,
First Responder will provide AHEMS with the run number associated with the call. The
Page 5
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
provision of any medications to any patient by AHEMS or First Responder will be consistent
with applicable drug protocols established by the Medical Director. First Responder will not
bill any patient or third party payer for any supplies or drugs provided pursuant to this
paragraph.
Additional Services. AHEMS will make the following additional services available to First
Responder and First Responder will compensate AHEMS for such services as set forth below:
a) Additional education sessions outside of the education and training described in
Section 2 of this Exhibit A (“Additional Services”). The Additional Services may
include: remediation, additional training, or consultation for large scale trainings; any
additional trainings; if class sizes grow consistently beyond the span of control and
observation is untenable for current contracted instructor number (s), additional
instructors; psychomotor capabilities confirmation; and remediation if Allina acts as
an agent for the First Responder. Any such Additional Services will be billed at
$75.00 per instructor hour. Any AHA CPR cards requested by the First Responder
will be billed at the current AHA card rate. If requested CPR cards will be billed at
the current Heartsaver CPR rate.
b) Any additional classes such as NCCR or additional trainings not covered by this
contract will be given at contract customer rates. Any members of the First Responder
Agency who take any Allina Health EMS classes will be offered those classes at
contract customer rates.
Page 6
Business Associate Addendum
Revised 3.2013
EXHIBIT B
Training: 2 separate 4 hour classes given twice for a total of 4, 4 hour sessions each year.
Scheduling and locations to be mutually agreed upon by First Responder and Allina Health
EMS. Training to include CPR recertification and card fees.
FEES
Total Services and Fees: $3840.00 annually.
Fees may be paid in lump sum or $960.00 per quarter.
)DLUYLHZ)RUHVW/DNH
$/6
RYHUODSZLWK
+HDOWK(DVW
%/6
RYHUODSZLWK
&ROXPELD+HLJKWV
%/6
RYHUODSZLWK
$OOLQD
%/66
RYHUODSZLWK
$OOLQD
%/6
RYHUODSZLWK
$OOLQD
$/66
RYHUODSZLWK
$OOLQD
$/6
RYHUODSZLWK
Fairview-Forest Lake
ALS #0084
(overlap with 0057,0220,0335)
HealthEast
BLS # -0219
(overlap with 0055,
0057,0220,0344
Elk River
ALS #0073
(overlap with 0057,
0220,0335)
Columbia Heights
BLS #0055
(overlap with 0057,0219,
0220,0344)
Allina
BLSS #0344
(overlap with 0055,0057,
0219,0220)
Allina
BLS #0335
(overlap with 0057,
0073,0084,0220)
Allina
ALSS #0220
(overlap with 0055,0057,0073,
0084,0219,0335,0344)
Allina
ALS #0057
(overlap with 0055,0073,0084,
0219,0220,0335,0344)
Emergency Medical Services
May 7, 2020
John Swenson – Public Safety Director
Lino Lakes Public Safety Department
640 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Chief Swenson,
On behalf of Allina Health it has been an honor to engage in the detailed EMS dialog and planning with
you and your leaders. Allina Health-EMS strives to be a transparent, collaborative, cutting edge EMS
organization and we are honored to have the opportunity provide our exceptional ambulance care and
services for the residents and visitors of Lino Lakes.
This document reflects the activities and commitments we have discussed to date and are moving to
execute. These include:
Providing Advanced level ambulance service to the City of Lino Lakes pursuant to the
requirements set in Minnesota Statute 144E.
Leasing Station 1 as a substation for $700 per month (lease is under review by our legal counsel).
EMS physician medical direction and training package from Allina EMS. The proposal has been
submitted to the City.
Review of response metrics and demonstrating how the addition of Lina Lakes to our service area
impacts response and staffing in our North Metro Region.
Allina EMS will add an additional 12 hours of cover per day in the evenings to supplement our
dynamically deployed resources in the north metro region. This as a result of our assessment of
current ambulance volumes in the City of Lino Lakes. Hours are adjusted as needed based on
current volumes.
Review of response times and pre-hospital needs on a regular basis (monthly or quarterly per the
City’s preference).
City to send Council proclamation redirecting ambulance calls to Allina Health EMS to the Anoka
County Sheriff’s office.
Service implementation date prior to June 1st 2020, date to be mutually agreed upon.
Allina Health EMS holds a Primary Service Area (PSA) license that encompass the City of Lino Lakes.
Therefore no contractual agreement is necessary to make this transition other than the outlined lease and
medical direction agreement for City’s public safety department. This is an overlapping PSA with
Fairview currently served by North Memorial Medical Transportation and was to begin being served by
Fairview M-Health on June 1, 2020.
Where overlaps occur neither the State nor the agencies can mandate which agency shall responds. In these
cases it is the municipality and primary PSAP that determines who will provide service in the overlap area.
City Council action naming a service to the PSAP is typically how overlaps are resolved.
We look forward to our partnership with the City and your public safety leaders! Please let me know if we
answer further questions from any of your leaders or elected official.
Susan Long
Susan Long
EMS Chief, Vice President of Operations
Allina Health – EMS
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: May 11 , 2020
TOPIC: Nadeau Acres
i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-20 Rezoning
Property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-20 Approving Preliminary
Plat and Opening Sub-District 3C & 3D of Utility Staging
Area 2A (2020-2025)
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff presented Nadeau Acres to the City Council at the March 2, 2020 and May 4, 2020 Work
Session. The following is an update since the May 4th Work Session:
Stormwater Outlet. Staff met with the adjacent property owners (Vickers) on Thursday, May
7, 2020 to review options for a stormwater outlet. The owners explained their concerns over
possible ditch erosion and ongoing maintenance concerns. As noted at the work session, if an
easement is obtained, the City will be responsible for ongoing maintenance of the
improvements including the outlet area. The owner informed staff of their preference for a
piped outlet with a dissipater still incorporated with the understanding that it is city maintained.
Staff is working with the developer’s engineer on a modified design.
Great River Energy (GRE) Easement. The power line easement, running north/south, is owned
by Great River Energy. The developer received approval from GRE on Tuesday, May 5, 2020
for work within the easement based on the existing plans. They are following up with GRE on
a plan amendment to extend pipe across to ditch. Since the existing approvals include both
sanitary, water and storm sewer lines, within the easement, we are not expecting any issues
with the new extension.
Josephine Lane and Utility Extension. The Vickers have raised concerns regarding the impact
of street, sewer, and water extension to their property line (Josephine Lane). Staff’s
discussions with the County Assessor’s office have indicated that the development of the
Nadeau Property, not the proximity of sewer/water utility and street improvement to the
property line, will drive any potential increase in value. However, staff is evaluating with the
developers’ engineer an option to pull back the sanitary, water main and street improvements
closer to the intersection. However in doing so, there will be an added cost to development of
the Vickers property in the future. Staff would also note that if the street is pulled back, it
2
should be clear in the meeting record that the street will be extended in future. The extension
of street stubs often becomes controversial after residents have moved in. Josephine Lane will
be a through street providing access to 20th Avenue from the Vickers property and it will need
to be clearly marked.
Staff is requesting City Council consideration of rezoning and preliminary plat for Nadeau
Acres.
Complete Application Date: January 13, 2020
60-Day Review Deadline: March 13, 2020
120-Day Review Deadline: May 12, 2020
Environmental Board Meeting: January 29, 2020
Park Board Meeting: NA
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: February 12, 2020
City Council Work Session: March 2 & May 4, 2020
City Council Meeting: May 11 , 2020
BACKGROUND
The applicant, BL Holdings, LLC, submitted a rezoning and preliminary plat land use
application for Nadeau Acres. The proposed single family residential development is located
north of CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and west of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) across from NorthPointe.
It contains two (2) parcels totaling approximately 33 gross acres. The applicant is proposing an
R-1, Single Family Residential development on standard 80 foot wide lots. The initial plans
presented to the Planning & Zoning Board on February 12, 2020 and the Council Work Session
proposed 69 single family lots. The revised plan increases the size of Pond 100 for additional
stormwater management, relocates the lift station and eliminates 1 single family lot. The total
number of single family lots is now 68.
The Land Use Applications are:
• Rezone property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential
• Preliminary Plat
This staff report is based on review the following plan sets and documents:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20,
2020
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6,
2019
• Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated
December 6, 2019
3
• Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Inc. dated December 23, 2019
• Rare Plant Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated December 12, 2019
• Traffic Impact Study by Spack Consulting dated December 6, 2019
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
The 30 acre site contains two (2) parcels currently addressed 6651 & 6677 20th Avenue and is
located north of CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and west of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) across from
NorthPointe. The site consists of two (2) single family houses, accessory buildings,
agricultural hay fields, and wetlands. The house located at 6677 20th Avenue will be moved
onto a new lot and the house located at 6651 20th Avenue will remain in place. Accessory
buildings will also be relocated. The existing septic systems shall be removed and wells
capped. One NSP utility transmission overhead electric line runs north-south along the west
boundary line and another NSP utility transmission line bisects the site diagonally. Both lines
are covered by easements. Topography of the site generally slopes downward from the
southeast to the northwest at elevations ranging from 925 EL to 905 EL. Groundwater was
encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 19 feet. Topsoil was encountered at ½ to 1 foot.
Below the topsoil, soils consist of glacial outwash sands and native clayey glacial till and are
classified as hydrologic groups HSG D in the southern portion and HSG C in the north.
Land Use and Zoning
Current and Proposed Zoning
The property is currently zoned R, Rural and is guided for low density residential land use. Per
the zoning ordinance, land that is guided low density residential can be zoned R-1, Single
Family Residential, R-1X, Single Family Executive Residential or R-2, Two Family
Residential.
The property is proposed to be rezoned to R-1, Single Family Residential. The R-1 zoning
provides a natural transition from the current PUD, Planned Unit Development (R-2, Two-
Family) zoning in the NorthPointe development to the east and the future medium density land
use to the north in Lino Lakes and the northwest in the City of Centerville.
At the time of submittal, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was under review by Met Council and
not formally adopted by the City Council. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is still in effect.
Current Zoning R, Rural
Proposed Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential
Current Land Use Rural Residential
2030 Future Land Use Low Density Residential
(1.6 to 3.9 units per acre)
2040 Future Land Use Low Density Residential
4
(1.6 to 3.0 units per acre)
2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025)
2040 Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025)
Density
The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density.
Gross Area (acres) 33.03
Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.65)
Public Parks & Open Space 0.00
Arterial ROW (0.74)
Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (1.69)
Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00
Net Area (acres) 29.95
# of Units 68
Gross Density (units/acre) 2.06
Net Density (units/acre) 2.27
Per the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is guided for low density residential
development which requires a density of 1.6 to 3.9 and 1.6 to 3.0 units per acres, respectively.
The proposed net density is 2.27 units per acre which is consistent with the 2030 & 2040
Comprehensive Plan’s guided land use and density.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use
North R, Rural Rural Residential Medium Density
Sewered Residential
South R, Rural Single Family
Residential
Low Density Sewered
Residential
East PUD Single Family
Residential
Medium Density
Sewered Residential
5
West R, Rural Agricultural Low Density Sewered
Residential
Zoning Requirements
The property is proposed to be rezoned from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
R-1
Requirements Nadeau Acres
Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf Ave. 14,120 sf
Min. Lot Width
-Interior Lot 80 ft 80 ft
-Corner Lot 100 ft 100 ft
Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 135 ft
Double Frontage Lots 145 ft 145 ft
Building Setback
-From Streets
--Local Street 30 ft 30 ft
--Collector or Arterial 40 ft 40 ft
--Corner lot 30 ft 30 ft
-Rear
--Principal 30 ft 30 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
-Side
--Principal 10 ft 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
--Corner lot 30 ft 30 ft
Buffer
15’ if side or
rear lot abuts
collector or
arterial street
15 ft buffer
provided along
CSAH 54
Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land
exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot
development. The applicant submitted a spreadsheet detailing that minimum lot areas are
10,800 sf. The average lot size is 14,120 sf.
6
Building Type and Construction
At the time of building permit, each individual single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for
compliance with Section 1007.043(2)(a), General Building Provisions and Section
1007.090(4), Building Requirements regarding floor area, garage and design and construction
standards.
Per Section 1007.042(5)(b)1.e., air conditioning or heating equipment shall be five (5) feet
from any rear lot line and ten (10) feet from any side lot line. No encroachment shall be
permitted in existing or required drainage and utility easements.
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential
development. The preliminary plat is also compliant with zoning ordinance performance
standards for the R-1 zoning district with some minor revisions.
Blocks and Lots
The preliminary plat has been revised from 69 single family lots to 68 and from 6 outlots to 5.
The outlots are for the following purposes:
Outlot Purpose
A Wetland and Stormwater Pond 400
B Stormwater Pond 100
C Road Easement for Future Development of
6687 20th Avenue
D Omitted NSP Easement Corridor
E D Stormwater Pond 200
F E Trail Corridor and Watermain Loop
On the original preliminary plat, Outlot D contained NSP easement and storm sewer pipe. To
minimize the City’s responsibility of mowing and maintaining manicured grass in this area, the
outlot has been omitted and the lot lines extended through the NSP easement.
The other outlots will be deeded to the City for ownership and maintenance.
Streets and Alleys
Internal road right-of-way widths are 60 feet and the paved roadway width is 32 feet back to
back. This is consistent with the City’s engineering standards. Cul de sac paved widths have
been revised to 32 feet back to back.
7
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) is classified as an A-Minor Arterial Reliever and requires a full 120
feet of dedicated road right-of-way. The plat dedicates 60 feet of road right-of-way from
section line as required. Turn lane plans have been submitted to Anoka County for review and
comment.
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) is classified as a Major Collector road along the section of the
proposed development and requires a full 80 feet of road dedicated right-of-way. The section of
the plat that abuts CSAH 34 (Birch Street) previously dedicated 60 feet of road right-of-way.
No further road right-of-way is required.
The length of Red Oak Lane cul de sac is 250 ft and Norma Way is 350ft. No permanent cul de
sac length exceeds 500 feet as required by ordinance. Length requirements do not apply to
temporary cul de sacs such as William Lane.
A temporary cul de sac and easement are shown on the west end of William Lane. A separate
recordable easement document will be recorded against the property and shall be terminated
upon extension of William Lane. The future developer will be responsible for removal of the
temporary cul de sac and restoration of the lot.
Private Driveway-6709 20th Avenue
In September 2015, the Nadeau’s owned and subdivided off the1 acre house parcel located at
6709 20th Avenue. Through the minor subdivision process, staff recommended the north
driveway be removed and the south driveway access Red Oak Lane upon its extension. The
Nadeau’s expressed concerns about removing the north driveway stating personal cars and
trucks could not turn left into the garage from the south driveway without backing into the
County road right-of-way. Staff agreed to leave the north driveway with the stipulation the
south driveway be removed when the southbound turn lane into NorthPointe was constructed.
Unfortunately, this south driveway onto CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) still remains. The driveway
will need to be relocated to the west upon extension of Red Oak Lane due to its close proximity
to the intersection.
Staff Comments:
• The applicant shall draft and record a temporary cul de sac easement.
• The cul de sac shall be removed and the temporary easement released upon extension of
William Lane.
• “Future Road Extension” signs are required at the west end of William Lane and Red
Oak Lane and at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided along all lot lines.
Drainage and utility easements are also dedicated over the outlots.
Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control
8
A Storm Water Management Plan has been prepared by a licensed, professional engineer and
reviewed for compliance by licensed, professional engineers from both WSB & Associates
(City) and Houston Engineering (RCWD). The revised plan increases the size of Pond 100 and
includes a plunge pool energy dissipator for additional stormwater management.
Per the revised March 20, 2020 Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain:
“The stormwater on the site flows to three different locations from the site. The majority of
the site drains to an existing private ditch/wetland area to the north of the site. A small portion
at the south of the site drains through an existing culvert along Birch St (CSAH 34). The
western portion of the site drains to the northwest to an existing private ditch.
The surface water will flow through three new ponds. Pond 200 located in the middle of the site
will pick up surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100.
Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the majority of the site and discharge to the west to
an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an
existing ditch to the north.
After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 8.8 acres of new impervious
surfaces including the streets, sidewalks, paths, parking lots, and rooftops. Due to poor soils in
the south portion of the site and a high groundwater table in the north portion of the site,
infiltration is not feasible.
The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the
storm sewer conveyance system and ponds. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for
the 2-, 10-, and 100-year rainfall events.”
Per the April 27, 2020 WSB City Engineer’s Review Memo:
“During the public hearing held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on February 12,
2020 there were a number of questions regarding the proposed developments’ stormwater
management plan. Below is a summary of findings and actions to address the questions:
• The site outlets to two private ditches, one in the northwest, and one to the north. There
is also a small area of the site that drains to the south.
• The proposed project is required to mitigate surface water and address water quality
through City, Watershed District and State Rules and Statues. This includes maintaining
the existing rate or reducing the rate of runoff from the site, and providing water quality
treatment for the proposed development. The project meets the City of Lino Lakes’
stormwater management requirements and RCWD rules. RCWD approved a CAPROC
on April 8, 2020.
o This project is proposing to reduce rates as detailed in the Stormwater Report,
and will utilize stormwater ponding for water quality treatment. The stormwater
management plan incorporates existing soils and time of concentrations to
calculate the needed ponding systems to mitigate the new impervious surfaces.
o The surface water from the new impervious surfaces will be accommodated
through three new ponds. Pond 200, located in the middle of the site, will pick
up surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond
9
100. Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the northwest portion of the site
and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will receive the
remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
o The design includes a standard outlet control structure with pipe outlet. An
outlet control structure is a device that holds water back in the proposed pond
and then discharges it slowly into the ditch so that the flow to the downstream
ditch is less than the existing condition flow into the ditch.
o The original design included an outlet pipe to the ditch. The applicant was
unable to obtain an easement for the outlet pipe to the ditch as required by the
City and RCWD. The applicant revised the design and enlarged the pond to
provide additional storage and added a plunge pool dissipater at the discharge
location.
• Adjacent property owners expressed concerns over the s stormwater runoff from the site
and the downstream private ditches. Staff had multiple conversations and Zoom
meetings with the property owners to better understand their concerns and explain the
existing and proposed conditions. This included an onsite evaluation, reviewing
topographic data, record plans, survey, and incorporation of the NorthPointe
development drainage plan. The downstream systems appear to be working correctly
and the NorthPointe development has reduced the surface water flow to the
subwatershed in question. We will continue to work the property owners and provide
information and findings.
o The adjacent private ditch owners are responsible to perpetuate existing runoff
rates and are to maintain the ditch flow through their property. Staff reviewed
private ditch requirements with the City Attorney and RCWD staff.
o 2019 was a record year for rainwater in Minneapolis-St. Paul area according to
the Minnesota DNR Year to Date Precipitation Chart. Soil saturation in the fall
of 2019 was similar to a spring snow melt condition where typically the fall is a
dryer condition. These conditions have led to standing water due to soil
saturation and higher flows in conveyance systems.
o We are working with one of the downstream property owner to complete culvert
maintenance on their property.
• In addition, we are having the developer verify the downstream conditions to confirm
their assumptions.”
Per the RCWD CAPROC dated April 8, 2020:
Soil conditions vary over the sloping site, with HSG D sandy lean clays (CL) at the higher
elevations, and HSG A/B poorly graded sands and sands with silt (SP/SP-SM) with sandy lean
clays below. The HSG D soils in addition to the high water table below the HSG A/B soils
make infiltration infeasible for the site. Thus, stormwater ponds are acceptable to meet the
water quality requirement. The pond sizing, and outlets and overflows are consistent with
design criteria. 100% of the project area either flows to the ponds or meets design criteria.
Additional TSS removal is not required. The applicant has met all the Water Quality
requirements and the design criteria of RCWD Rule C: Stormwater Management Plans.
10
2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs)
Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed
North to Private Ditch 3.5 2.3 5.1 3.9 6.9 5.7
West to Private Ditch 11.6 9.2 34.1 28.7 82.8 74.7
South through
Culvert under Birch
Street
4.4 3.5 8.0 6.5 14.6 11.9
Totals* 19.2 12.5 46.7 35.6 103.3 87.8
*Difference due to time of concentration
Post-development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre-development rates.
Phasing
The site will be mass graded in one (1) phase and developed in two (2) phases. Phase 1 has 35
lots and Phase 2 has 33 lots.
Utilities
Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development.
Sanitary Sewer
An 8”-10” sanitary sewer pipe, 4” forcemain and lift station will serve the site.
Both existing houses located at 6651 and 6677 20th Avenue are served by private septic
systems. The house located at 6677 20th Avenue is being relocated onto a new lot in the
subdivision. Both houses are required to connect to the municipal sanitary sewer system.
Watermain
An 8” watermain will extend and loop from the east (NorthPointe) along Red Oak and from the
south (Birch Street) and serve the site.
The house located at 6651 20th Avenue is connected to municipal city water. The relocated
house will also connect to municipal city water.
Public Land Dedication
The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Per the City’s Park, Greenway & Trail
System Plan, a future neighborhood park is programmed to the west of this site. See
Attachment #3. Sidewalks along the streets in the development will connect to future trail
corridors along CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). A 300 foot long trail will
be constructed in Outlot F and will terminate at the lot line. This trail segment will eventually
connect to a future trail along the north side of Birch Street. Terminating the trail at the lot line
now will prevent vehicles from confusing the trail with a road. Credit will be given for the
construction cost of the trail extension to Birch Street.
11
Nadeau Acres
68 lots x $3,150 = $214,200
-Trail Construction Cost TBD
TOTAL = TBD
Tree Preservation
The Environmental Coordinator and Environmental Board reviewed the tree preservation and
landscape plans.
The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest
resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The Tree
Inventory Report prepared by Carlson McCain revised January 10, 2020 identifies 750
significant trees on site. Eighty-eight (88) trees were identified as non-significant (e.g. ash
trees, elm trees etc.) and will be removed without mitigation requirements. Of the remaining
662 trees, 252 trees will be saved and 410 will be removed. Sheet T4, Tree Preservation Plan
identifies the basic use area and environmentally sensitive areas. Five (5) trees are being
removed within the natural resource conservation area. Fourteen (14) trees are being removed
from the non-ESA and non-basic use areas. This requires 29 replacement trees for mitigation
which are provided throughout the development.
Landscaping
Open area landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 sf. Existing
trees on site may be used to satisfy open area landscaping requirements if applicable by
placement. This would only apply to the existing trees on Outlot A. The landscaping plan has
been revised to provide adequate open space mitigation for Outlots B, D and E. Outlots C does
not require mitigation because it is for future right-of way.
Buffer and screen standards apply along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue), specifically Block 4, Lots 12-
15 that have a rear frontage on 20th Avenue. Approximately 475 linear feet of frontage will be
screened by shrubs, new trees, and existing trees to provide a continuous planting screen year-
round. The Preliminary Landscape Plan shows trees and shrubs planted on two separate berms.
It was suggested these berms be combined to provide a continuous berm; however, an opening
between the 2 berms is needed to provide rear yard drainage. A triangulated row of coniferous
trees will be planted in addition to the berms that will provide appropriate screening.
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family. There
are 68 single family lots that require 77 boulevard trees (interior and corner lots). Seventy-nine
(79) trees are proposed which is compliant with the ordinance.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
The site is not within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR; therefore, no mitigation is required.
12
Traffic Study
A Traffic Study was prepared by Spack Solutions on December 6, 2019. The study was based
on a concept plan with 74 single family homes. Based on ITE standards and local data collected
by Spack Solutions, the development is forecasted to generate approximately 685 new trips per
day with 50 new trips in the a.m. peak hours (7-8am) and 65 trips in the p.m. peak hours (4:30 -
5:30pm).
Traffic impacts are analyzed in terms of volume and capacity. Volume quantifies how many
vehicles are using the road and capacity quantifies the number of vehicles the road can
accommodate.
Traffic Volumes
Roadway Location
Existing
Daily
Volumes1
2040
Forecasted
Daily
Volumes2
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) North of Red Oak Lane 5,300/6,100 14,000
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) South of Red Oak Lane 5,600/6,100 14,000
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) South of CSAH 34 (Birch St) 2,900/3,000 14,000
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) West of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) 3,500/3,150 10,000
1Spack Video Data Collection/2018 AADT Volumes
2Anoka County’s 2040 Transportation Plan
Existing traffic volumes near the site are between 5,300-5,600 AADT (annual average daily
traffic). Nadeau Acres will generate approximately 685 new trips per day. These new trips
added to the existing daily trips are significantly less than the 2040 forecasted daily volumes.
Traffic Capacity
A ratio of volume to capacity is used to analyze traffic congestion. A road with a volume to
capacity ratio of 1.0 means the traffic volume is nearly equal to the traffic capacity and will feel
congested to motorists. Per the traffic study, three (3) sections of roadways (20th Ave north of
Birch St, 20th Ave south of Birch St and Birch St) were analyzed under Existing, 2024 No-
Build and 2024 Build scenarios. No volume to capacity ratio exceeded 0.45. None of study
roadways are expected to exceed their daily capacities.
Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions of an intersection. Facilities
are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions).
Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance establishes
minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or
13
B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is
C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to
ensure a LOS of D or better.
Existing Peak Hour LOS Proposed Peak Hour LOS
Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
20th Ave & Red Oak Lane B B C C
20th Ave & Birch Street B C B C
The proposed Levels of Service do not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore the
subdivision is not considered premature.
The project is also under review by Anoka County Highway Department. They have identified
the need for right and left turn lanes on CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). These details shall be
provided by the developer.
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) Corridor Study
In April 2011, Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes hired SRF Consulting Group to
develop a corridor study along CSAH 34 (Birch Street). Per the recommended corridor plan,
future full-access intersections near Nadeau Acres are every ¼ mile. No access (full or partial)
is proposed onto CSAH 34 (Birch Street) from Nadeau Acres. A pedestrian (trail or sidewalk)
corridor will connect Nadeau Acres to Birch Street.
I-35E/CR J/Centerville Road
Staff is aware of current traffic concerns at I-35E/CR J/Centerville Road but these are outside
the scope of Nadeau Acres. These interchanges are currently under evaluation by other
government agencies. Ramsey County is working on a federal transportation funding
application to reconstruct bridge and ramp terminals and CR J/Centerville Road intersection.
Local and County staffs are also working with state representatives on possible preliminary
design funding in the State’s bonding bill. Anoka County is also considering a transportation
funding application for improvement of the Centerville Road/CR J intersection.
Wetlands
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report dated
October 29, 2019. A Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 11, 2019.
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Permit Application dated
December 23, 2019. Per the report, two (2) wetlands were delineated on site totaling 1.37 acres.
Wetland 1 is a Type 1 wet meadow wetland. Wetland 2 is a partially-drained, wet meadow and
scrub-shrub wetland. A portion of Wetland 2 southwest of the septic mound discharge outlet
was created in upland and is incidental.
The proposed project will require 30,826 square feet (sf) (0.7076 acre) of permanent
14
impact to four (4) wetland areas, one of which is incidental for WCA permitting. Replacement
will be accomplished via the purchase of wetland banking credits.
The site is inside of the boundaries of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and
Management Plan (CWPMP) area; however, onsite wetlands do not fall within the landscape
scale/preliminary Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Therefore, no WMC buffer on
wetlands is required with site development.
Rare & Endangered Species
Per the December 12, 2019 report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources, no habitats for state-
listed plant species were observed during field review. No further surveys are recommended.
Floodplain
There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
At the time of this staff report, the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan is under review by the Met
Council and has not formally been adopted by the City of Lino Lakes. Therefore, the 2030
Comprehensive Plan is in effect.
Nadeau Acres is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to
resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities.
Resource Management System Plan
Goals of the Resource Management System Plan include:
• Natural Resources and Amenities
o Goal #1: Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological
and aquatic resources of the community.
• Land Use Policies
o Goal #1: Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial
and institutional development to accommodate the city’s projected growth needs
occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the city’s natural resources
and amenities.
The Nadeau Acres protects the natural resource by providing storm water management and
vege tative buffers.
Land Use Plan
Goal 1: Create a unified vision and future for the city, promote a well-planned community,
prevent fragmented development, address the impacts of development and redevelopment on
natural resources, aesthetics and view corridors, and provide balanced land use and
connectivity that ensures the integration of both sides of the regional park.
15
Goal 2: Ensure that zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps are consistent with
the intent and specific direction provided within the Comprehensive Plan.
Policies:
1. Ensure developers meet the standards specified within the land-use plan and official
controls, including zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps.
2. Ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses.
Nadeau Acres meets the land use goals by developing a single family residential subdivision
that is consistent with low density residential development as guided by the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan. Low density residential development allows for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre.
The net density for the development is 2.27 units per net acre. This is consistent with density
requirements.
Housing Plan
Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and
provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. Policies include linking
trails to parks, lakes and schools.
Nadeau Acres meets the goal of the housing plan. The development is compatible with the
existing adjacent residential homes. Sidewalk/trail will provide corridors to future trails along
CSAH 54(20th Avenue) and CSAH 34 (Birch Street).
Economic Development
Nadeau Acres does not negatively impact the city’s economic development goals.
Transportation Plan
Goal 1: Plan for and achieve required street improvements and connectivity throughout the
City of Lino Lakes.
Goal 2: Ensure that streets and roads are as safe as possible.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the 2030 Transportation Plan by providing a safe road
connection between future neighborhoods, constructing turn lanes along CSAH 54 (20th
Avenue) and controlling access management along County roads.
Sanitary Sewer Plan
Goal 1: Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial and institutional
development to accommodate the City's projected growth needs occurs in a manner that also
conserves and enhances the city's natural resources and amenities.
Goal 5: Maintain the City's residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer
system.
16
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the sanitary sewer plan. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer
District 3 (Sub-district 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025). The
sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development. The sanitary sewer system will
also be oversized to accommodate future development to the north and west.
Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy, the City Council will
determine by resolution if the next 10 year, 2A (2020-2025) staging area shall be opened to
development. Resolution No. 20-20 details the findings of fact.
Water Supply Plan
Goal 4: Provide the City's residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe
and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the water supply plan. The site is served by an 8” watermain
extending from the east and loops south to Birch Street. The water system has capacity to serve
this residential development.
Environmental Board Comments
The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed preliminary plat on January 29, 2020. They
recommended approval of the project with conditions listed in the April 23, 2020 Memo from
the Environmental Coordinator. Conditions include minor revisions to the open space
landscaping, boulevard tree diversity and suggested tree species.
Final Plat
A land use application for final plat and Development Agreement shall be required.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 12, 2020. Board and resident
comments included questions about access to NorthPointe Park, grading and drainage,
driveway and turn lane construction, vehicle headlight glare and wetland impacts.
The Board recommended approval with a 2-1 vote.
Findings of Fact
The Findings of Fact for the rezoning, preliminary plat and utility staging area are detailed in
Ordinance No. 02-20 and Resolution No. 20-20, respectively.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Board and staff recommend approval of the rezoning and preliminary
plat for Nadeau Acres with conditions listed in the resolution.
17
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial Map
2. Future Land Use Map
3. Neighborhood Service Area Park Map
4. City Engineer Review Memo dated April 27, 2020
5. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated April 23, 2020
6. Revised Preliminary Plan Set dated March 20, 2020 prepared by Carlson McCain
7. Ordinance No. 02-20
8. Resolution No. 20-20
0 300 600150
Feet
662066201929192919691969
66776677
66256625
19491949
66336633
66516651
19091909
66876687
67286728
20092009
1997199719891989
20082008
205120512015201520212021202720272033203320392039
2050205020442044203820382032203220262026202020202014201420562056
67096709
CHESTNUT STCHESTNUT STCCYYPPRREESSSSSSTTCOTTONWOOD AVECOTTONWOOD AVER ED O A K L NRED O A K L N
RR
OOSSEEWW OOOODD SSTT
R O S E WO O D S TROSEWOOD S T
Aerial MapNadeau Acres µ
CSAH 34 (Birch Street)CSAH 54 (20th Avenue)
0 600 1,200300
Feet
IJ84
§¨¦I-35E
OOTTTTEERRLLAAKKEERRDDCCEE DDAA RR SS TT
ALBERT CTALBERT CTCC YY PP RREE SSSS SS TT
CCYYPPRREESSSSSSTTBUTTERNUT STBUTTERNUT ST
CHESTNUT STCHESTNUT STCOTTONWOOD AVECOTTONWOOD AVER ED W O O D STR ED W O O D STTTAARRTTLLAAKKEE
RRDD
LLAA CC AASSSSEEDD RR
CCLLEEAARRWWAATTEERRCCRREE EEKK CCTT
2211SSTTAAVVEESSR ED OA K L NRED OA K L N
TELE DRTELE DR
LLAANNGGEERRLL
NN21ST AVE21ST AVERR EE DD WW OO OO DD CC TTTELE LNTELE LNRROOSSEEWW OOOODD SSTT
CEDAR STCEDAR ST
RR OO SS EE WW OOOODDSSTT PALM STPALM STFuture Land Use MapNadeau Acres µ
Legend
Future Land Use 2030 (S tantec)Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec)
Permanent Rural
Urban Reserve
Low Density Sewered Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Mixed Use
Industrial
Civic/Institutional
Park and Open Space
Private Airfield
Right-of-Way
Open Water
I-35W
10-10
Figure 10-2� Park Service Areas
kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kjkj
kj
kj
kj
ú
úúBaldwin Lake
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilkinson
Lake
Otter Lake
Amelia
Lake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
Centerville
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
Li l a c
S t
20th Ave S456721
456749
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456754
456754
456714456714
20thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")140
")84
")84
Ma in
StMainStMain St
Cedar
St
HodgsonRdLake DrElm St
Birch St
Birch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr62nd St N
Ash St RondeauLakeRd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th St
A
B C
D
E
I
J
H
F GK
L
M
N
White Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of Columbus
City of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview
!2
!3
!4
!5
!7
!10
!11 !12 !13 !14
!15
!16
!17
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!18
!1
!6
!8
!9
´
Figure 10-2
Neighborhood Service Areas
Legend
City of Centerville
kj Future Neighborhood Park
Search Area's
ú Existing Tunnel
ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge
Existing Asphalt
Existing Concrete Trail
Existing Boardwalk Trail
Proposed Trails
Existing Regional Trail
Proposed Regional Trail
Greenway System
Undeveloped Park City
Property
City Parks
Regional Parks
School
Neighborhood Park Service
Area
Open Water
Municipal Boundary
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019
1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchw ood A cres
2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow P onds O/S
3 C ity H all Park 12 C ountry Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake E states O/S
4 C entury Farm N orth 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park
5 B ehm's Park 14 Pheasants H ill Park 23 Brandy w ood Park
6 H ighland M eadow P ark 15 N orth Pointe Park 24 Recreation C omplex
7 Lino P ark 16 C learw ater C reek O/S 25 Woods of Baldw in Park
8 Sunset Oaks P ark 17 C learw ater C reek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park
9 M arshan P ark 18 Shenandoah Park
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes
From: Kelsey Gelhar, WSB & Associates
Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes
Date: April 27, 2020
Re: Nadeau Acres Preliminary Plat Review 15306-000
WSB has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Utility Plans for the Nadeau Acres development in Lino Lakes,
MN, prepared by Carlson McCain. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and
documents:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6, 2019, and revised March
20, 2020.
• Turn Lane Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain received March 30, 2020
• Turn Lane Grading Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain received March 30, 2020
Carlson McCain responded to these comments in red. WSB reviewed the following and responded to Carlson
McCain’s comments in blue:
Engineering
• Grading
The Nadeau Acres development includes site grading for Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, Josephine Court,
Norma Way, and William Lane as well as the grading required for building pads, and Ponds 100, 200, and
400. Four retaining walls are proposed on the site.
Comments:
1. Add additional labels to both existing and proposed contours.
Labels added.
2. Retaining walls #1 & #4 shall be eliminated and the applicant shall obtain temporary grading
easements with adjacent property owners or the applicant shall adjust the grading plans to
eliminate the need for the walls.
Retaining wall #1 revised. This wall cannot be removed entirely due to the lift station location
and the unlikelihood of obtaining a grading easement from adjacent owner. This wall can be
removed with future development to the north. Retaining Wall #4 removed and grading revised
to maintain all grading on-site. Developer looking into the possibility of removing walls 2 & 3 if
adjacent owner will allow slope grading onto their property.
Retaining wall #1 eliminated due to new lift station location.
3. Additional topographic information is needed (minimum 100’ beyond preliminary plat boundary,
including at the extensions of Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, William Lane)
Lidar added to existing topo to show this area.
Current page layout does not show 100’ beyond the north limit of the project site.
4. Retaining walls #2 and #3 (now #1 and #2) exceed maximum allowed height. All retaining walls over
4-ft tall require structural design.
Noted. These walls will be designed by a structural engineer and plans provided by the contractor.
How will the retaining walls be maintained in the future?
5. Additional rear yard drainage and utility easement required on Lot 145.
Lots revised so no drainage from adjacent lot drains into Lot 145.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 2
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Grading revised. See comment 10 under the Stormwater Management section.
6. 10 foot side yard drainage and utility easement required on Lot 101.
Revised
7. 10 foot side yard drainage and utility easement required on Lots158 and 159.
Revised.
Now lots 157 & 158, side yard drainage and utility easement added.
8. Drainage swales do not meet minimum 2% requirement at the following locations: rear lot line of
Lots 116, 117,119, 121.
Slopes revised
Lot numbers have changed, but grading in the areas mentioned has been updated.
9. Grade break elevations needed on Lots 124, 139, 165.
Spot elevations added at right-of-way for rear yard swale slope verification.
Lot numbers have changed, but grading has been updated.
10. The development is a two-phase development. It is anticipated that grading for the entire site
and for the stormwater ponds will be completed at once and not in two phases.
Noted.
11. Provide construction details for the turf maintenance accesses. Individual lot surveys will be required to
include the turf maintenance access locations (Lots 2 & 3 of Block 1, Lots 6 & 7 of Block 2, and Lots 7 &
8 of Block 6).
Maintenance access detail added to detail sheet 12
• Stormwater Management
The stormwater on the site flows to three different locations from the site. The majority of the site drains to an
existing private ditch/wetland area to the north of the site. A small portion at the south of the site drains through
an existing culvert along Birch St (CSAH 34). The western portion of the site drains to the northwest to an
existing private ditch.
The surface water will flow through three new ponds. Pond 200 located in the middle of the site will pick up
surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100. Pond 100 will pick up surface
water from the northwest portion of the site and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will
receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 8.8 acres of new impervious surfaces including
the streets, sidewalks, paths, parking lots, and rooftops. Due to poor soils in the south portion of the site and a
high groundwater table in the north portion of the site, infiltration is not feasible.
Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 19 feet. Topsoil was encountered at ½ to 1 foot.
Below the topsoil, soils consist of glacial outwash sands and native clayey glacial till and are classified as
hydrologic groups HSG D in the southern portion and HSG C in the north.
The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer
conveyance system and ponds. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year
rainfall events.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year
Pre-Development 18.9 19.2
46.4 46.7
103.4 103.3
Post-Development 13.1 12.5
41.7 35.6
91.9 87.8
Post-development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre-development rates.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 3
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
During the public hearing held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on February 12, 2020 there were a
number of questions regarding the proposed developments’ stormwater management plan. Below is a summary
of findings and actions to address the questions:
• The site outlets to two private ditches, one in the northwest, and one to the north. There is also a small
area of the site that drains to the south.
• The proposed project is required to mitigate surface water and address water quality through City,
Watershed District and State Rules and Statues. This includes maintaining the existing rate or reducing
the rate of runoff from the site, and providing water quality treatment for the proposed
development. The project meets the City of Lino Lakes’ stormwater management requirements and
RCWD rules. RCWD approved a CAPROC on April 8, 2020.
o This project is proposing to reduce rates as detailed in the Stormwater Report, and will utilize
stormwater ponding for water quality treatment. The stormwater management plan
incorporates existing soils and time of concentrations to calculate the needed ponding systems
to mitigate the new impervious surfaces.
o The surface water from the new impervious surfaces will be accommodated through three new
ponds. Pond 200, located in the middle of the site, will pick up surface water from the south
portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100. Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the
northwest portion of the site and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400
will receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
o The design includes a standard outlet control structure with pipe outlet. An outlet control
structure is a device that holds water back in the proposed pond and then discharges it slowly
into the ditch so that the flow to the downstream ditch is less than the existing condition flow
into the ditch.
o The original design included an outlet pipe to the ditch. The applicant was unable to obtain an
easement for the outlet pipe to the ditch as required by the City and RCWD. The applicant
revised the design and enlarged the pond to provide additional storage and added a plunge
pool dissipater at the discharge location.
• Adjacent property owners expressed concerns over the s stormwater runoff from the site and the
downstream private ditches. Staff had multiple conversations and Zoom meetings with the property
owners to better understand their concerns and explain the existing and proposed conditions. This
included an onsite evaluation, reviewing topographic data, record plans, survey, and incorporation of
the NorthPointe development drainage plan. The downstream systems appear to be working correctly
and the NorthPointe development has reduced the surface water flow to the subwatershed in question.
We will continue to work the property owners and provide information and findings.
o The adjacent private ditch owners are responsible to perpetuate existing runoff rates and are
to maintain the ditch flow through their property. Staff reviewed private ditch requirements with
the City Attorney and RCWD staff.
o 2019 was a record year for rainwater in Minneapolis-St. Paul area according to the Minnesota
DNR Year to Date Precipitation Chart. Soil saturation in the fall of 2019 was similar to a spring
snow melt condition where typically the fall is a dryer condition. These conditions have led to
standing water due to soil saturation and higher flows in conveyance systems.
o We are working with one of the downstream property owner to complete culvert maintenance
on their property.
• In addition, we are having the developer verify the downstream conditions to confirm their assumptions.
Comments:
1. Pond 100 is discharging to a private ditch, which should be coordinated with the Rice Creek
Watershed District and the City of Centerville.
Discharge location is being verified with developer.
Plunge Pool Energy Dissipator has been added to discharge location per discussion with watershed
district and City. See comment 9 regarding the plunge pool energy dissipator design.
2. Sections of the storm sewer are located directly beneath the overhead powerlines and should be
relocated.
Revised.
The storm sewer needs to be offset at least 20’ from the proposed structure on Lot 5 Block 4.
3. Adjust storm sewer that currently runs through Outlot C so that it follows the curb.
Revised. Note that in order to force storm sewer to follow the curb for its entirety in this lot, 2 additional
structures would be required. Catch basin moved further north to reduce the assumed future easement
in a potential front yard.
4. The storm sewer that is part of the rear yard drainage system for Lots 6 & 7 of Block 2 is too close to
the future houses. Applicant shall move the storm sewer to the west while maintaining a 20-ft offset
from the overhead power line.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 4
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Storm adjusted further back. Note that 20 feet from overhead power is not possible given the
maintenance access location and the need to revise a storm manhole to a catch basin manhole for
drainage purposes.
We are still concerned that the storm sewer is too close to the proposed structures for Lots 6 & 7 of
Block 2.
5. The north arrow is incorrect and wetlands on the figures should be labeled or noted in the legends
on Stormwater Management Plan Figures 2 and 3 and Storm Sewer Catchment Figure 4.
North arrow revised. Wetland line added to legend.
6. Show Proposed HydroCAD Pond “CB50” on Figure 3.
CB50 added.
7. Proposed HydroCAD Pond P300 stage storage invert (911.0) does not match bottom contour
shown on grading plan. (914)
HydroCAD model updated to match grading plan.
8. Ponds modeled in HydroCAD for backyard drainage swales and depressions (P300, P30A, P30B, and
CB50) should be modeled as a catch basin in HydroCAD (“pond with insignificant storage”). If they are
modeled as ponds, they will need to be evaluated to meet freeboard requirements for detention basins
(2’ of freeboard from the low entry in the 100-year storm event).
Revised to ponds with insignificant storage. Note that CB 122/123 was modeled as ponds to
determine by-pass flow (if any) to see if these would be directed towards a different pond/wetland or
offsite.
9. Plunge Pool Energy Dissipator grading requires revision. The bottom of the plunge pool grading of
891.5 has no width in the middle of it and grading is not feasible. Recommend at least 4-feet bottom
width to avoid erosion of slopes of pool. Confirm riprap size used at riprap check and overflow.
Recommend a detail or notes regarding width and depth of riprap check and overflow, and note on
how riprap size was determined.
10. Drainage Area S-10 is shown to flow to W-10. S-10 includes area east of Lots 12-20 of Block 4.
Confirm the drainage path for flow to pass from south to north under proposed Red Oak Lane.
11. Roadway profile and storm sewer – the road profile shall be a minimum of 1% grade. Adjust road
profile grade to move low points from intersections, Josephine and Red Oak. Storm sewer roadway
catch basins are spaced too far apart, 350 ft min. please extend storm sewer and add catch basins.
12. For the downstream ditches / outlets please provide a baseline data report
- Survey the bottom of the ditches.
- Provide a ditch cross section every 200’ or where it is observed to have a change in section.
- Shoot culverts and provide information on type, elevation and condition, document % full of water.
• Water Supply
There is existing 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain along 20th Av enue (CSAH 54) east
of the site and along Birch Street (CSAH 34) south of the site.
The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan does not designate any trunk watermain going through this
site. This has been revised with the latest water system plan.
The applicant is proposing an 8-inch diameter DIP watermain to serve the entire development. The
watermain will extend and loop from the east (North Pointe) along Red Oak Lane and from the south
(Birch Street).
Comments:
1. The watermain along Red Oak Lane shall be 12-inch diameter DIP. Trunk watermain credits will
apply.
Revised.
This is to be updated to a 16 inch DIP trunk watermain along Red Oak and Josephine. Trunk
water credits will apply.
2. A hydrant shall be installed by the lift station at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
Revised. Note that hydrant elevation may need to be revised when Heritage Avenue extends to the
north.
Please put a temporary hydrant at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
3. Applicant shall add a temporary hydrant at the dead end of Red Oak Lane.
Revised. Temporary hydrants added to site plans.
4. The City of Lino Lakes should consider installing water service stubs to serve the possible
future development at 6687 20th Avenue (26-31-22-14-002). It is anticipated that this parcel will develop into five lots that have access off of Red Oak Lane.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 5
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Per planning comments, these services can be added with final plans.
Noted.
• Sanitary Sewer
There is an existing 10-inch diameter poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer stub at the intersection
of Red Oak Lane and 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). The invert of the stub is approximately 913.6 and is to
be verified.
The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan identifies a lift station to serve sanitary sewer districts 3D
and 3G.
The applicant is proposing to serve the development with 8-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer, 10- inch
diameter PVC sanitary sewer, a lift station located at the north edge of the development, and 4” PVC
forcemain. The lift station will pump the waste through the 4-inch diameter PVC forcemain to the existing
10-inch diameter PVC gravity sewer located on Red Oak Lane, just east of 20th Avenue
that was installed with the North Pointe development.
The Lift Station location is now proposed at Outlot F.
Comments:
1. Applicant shall extend the sanitary sewer on Red Oak Ln further to the east and provide a stub for
future connections.
Revised.
The City of Lino Lakes should consider installing sanitary service stubs to serve the possible
future development at 6687 20th Avenue (26-31-22-14-002). It is anticipated that this parcel will
develop into five lots that have access off of Red Oak Lane.
Per planning comments, these services can be added with final plans. Manhole moved further
east.
Noted.
2. Applicant shall submit a Lift Station Service Area Exhibit.
Lift station service area exhibit attached.
3. It is anticipated that the lift station in its current position will need to be 3 to 4-ft deeper. The
applicant shall review the necessary depth or consider moving the lift station to the area near the
western end of Red Oak Lane.
See attached service area exhibit. Lowered the line to provide separation from the culvert on
abandoned county ditch 47. Deepening the sanitary line creates a deep sanitary line within the
site and a secondary sanitary line has been added.
Please upsize the force main to a 6” diameter. Trunk credits will apply.
• Transportation
20th Avenue (CSAH 54) is classified as an A-minor Arterial Reliever and Birch Street (CSAH 34) is
classified as a Major Collector road.
Per the traffic study, Nadeau Acres will generate approximately 685 new trips per day with 50 new trips in
the a.m. peak hours (7-8 a.m.) and 65 trips in the p.m. peak hours (4:30-5:30 p.m.). None of the proposed
roadways are expected to exceed their daily capacities.
The study also reviewed the existing and proposed Levels of Service for the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and
Red Oak Lane intersection and the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and Birch Street (CSAH 34)
intersection. The proposed Levels of Service do not degrade by more than allowed by the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance.
Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, and William Lane are proposed to be 32-ft wide from the back of curb to
the back of curb. The two cul-de-sacs, Josephine Court and Norma Way, are both proposed to be 28-ft
wide from back of curb to back of curb with cul-de-sac radii of 46-ft from the center to the back of curb.
The site will be accessed from 20th’Avenue (CSAH 54). The applicant is proposing widening 20th Avenue to
allow for a left turn lane (to Nadeau Acres), a through lane, and a right turn lane (to North Pointe) going
northbound and a right turn lane (to Nadeau Acres) and a left/through
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 6
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
lane going southbound.
Comments:
1. Anoka County is reviewing the traffic study and proposed turn lanes. It is anticipated that Anoka
County will require a designated southbound through lane along with a designated left turn lane
and right turn lane on 20th Avenue (CSAH 54).
Noted. This will be coordinated with the county.
Applicant shall show the proposed turn lane layout on both the site plan and the grading plan.
Anoka County will review the detailed turn lane plan for lane lengths and widths.
2. Update the cul-de-sac street widths to be 32-ft wide from back of curb to back of curb to meet city
requirements.
Revised.
3. Applicant shall realign the southern driveway entrance for 6709 20th Avenue that currently
provides access to 20th Avenue to Red Oak Lane.
Notes added to site plan.
Realign driveway more west ~ 100’ min from the intersection of Red Oak Lane and 20th
Avenue. The applicant is to coordinate with property owner.
4. Applicant shall show the proposed driveway for the existing house on Lot 10, Block 5.
Driveway added.
5. Red Oak Lane should have an eastbound through/left lane and a designated right turn lane at the
intersection of Red Oak Lane and 20th Avenue.
Lanes added.
Designated right turn lane shall be the same length as the right turn lane on Red Oak Lane east
of 20th Avenue.
6. Applicant shall identify the northern roadway limit of Heritage Avenue.
End of road added to plans. Grading adjusted accordingly.
7. City should consider the location of the pedestrian crossing at Heritage Avenue and William Lane.
Traffic maneuvering around the corner may not be expecting pedestrians crossing there. Options
to consider include extending the trail to move the crossing or moving the sidewalk to the south
side of William Lane and the east side of Heritage Avenue.
Advanced warning signs can be installed as well as a crosswalk paint markings and signage at the
crosswalk. Note that the turn from Heritage to William will require vehicles to slow down
significantly while taking the tight turn.
Sight lanes cannot be achieved for proper pedestrian safety. Applicant shall revise the sidewalk
location.
8. The Heritage Avenue/William Lane cul-de-sac exceeds the City’s maximum of 500-ft. This can
be allowed because the cul-de-sac is temporary.
Noted.
• Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report dated October 29,
2019. A Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 11, 2019. Per the report, two wetlands
were delineated on site totaling 1.43 acres. Wetland 1 is a Type 1 wet meadow wetland. Wetland 2 is a
partially-drained, wet meadow and scrub-shrub wetland. A portion of Wetland 2 southwest of the septic
mound discharge outlet was created in upland and is incidental. The project area is not located within the
Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP) and outside of Wetland
Management Corridor (WMC).
The applicant is proposing 0.7 acres of disturbance and will be purchasing wetland banking credits.
• Landscaping
Open area landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 sf. Buffer and
screen standards apply along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). Approximately 475 linear feet of frontage will
be screened by shrubs, new trees, and existing trees to provide a continuous planting screen year-
round. The Preliminary Landscape Plan shows trees and shrubs planted on two separate berms.
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family.
Comments:
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 7
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
1. Boulevard trees should be shown within the city right-of-way.
Updated
2. Move plantings off of proposed storm sewer and riprap areas.
Noted.
3. Coniferous trees shall be 10-ft from trail edges. Deciduous trees shall be 15-ft from trail edges.
Noted.
Trees near trail extension to Birch Street do not meet the requirements listed above.
• Floodplain
There are no existing floodplains on Nadeau Acres.
• Drainage and Utility Easements
Drainage and utility easements are proposed within the site where there is proposed storm sewer,
backyard swales, and stormwater management facilities. There is an existing 66-ft wide powerline
easement that runs from northeast to southwest through the middle of the site, and an existing 85-ft
wide powerline easement that runs along the western edge of the site.
The applicant is dedicating a 60-ft right-of-way along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and an 80-ft right-of-way
along Birch Street (CSAH 34).
Comments:
1. Storm sewer between lots 108 and 109 is greater than 10-ft deep, therefore, the easement shall be
twice as wide as the depth.
Easement revised to 30-feet. Storm sewer is approximately 14.5 feet deep.
2. 10’ Turf Maintenance Access to be installed over all storm sewer utility proposed between lots.
Include between lots 155 and 154, 150 and 149, 121 and 122, and 109 and 108,
Added.
Lot numbers changed, Turf Maintenance Access added.
3. Drainage and Utility Easements shall not be within powerline easements unless there is
documentation from the powerline company to use this space as an easement.
Easements revised.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant needs to submit documentation that the power
company will grant drainage and utility easements.
4. Temporary grading easements on adjacent properties may be required (see Grading section for more
details).
Retaining walls removed from right-of -way and stub streets/temporary dead-ends pulled back to
allow for grading on-site.
5. Provide documentation of grading and utility agreement within the NSP powerline easements (85-ft
wide easement and 66-ft wide easement).
In Process. – Permit Application submitted 02-24-2020
6. Grading for the outlet for Pond 100 is on adjacent private property (26-31-22-12-0006) and will
require a drainage and utility easement approval from the property owner and NSP.
Noted. will be coordinated with property owner. Plans will be adjusted accordingly if easement
cannot be obtained.
Plans have been adjusted.
7. Sheet 6 showing the ghost plat is missing from the plan set dated 3/20/2020.
• Development Agreement
A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat.
Noted.
• Grading Agreement
A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City’s Programmatic
Stormwater Management Agreement.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 8
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
• Permits Required
1. NPDES General Construction Permit
2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction
3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
4. Minnesota Department of Health
5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit- Note CAPROC 4/8/2020
6. Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit
7. Provide documentation of Northern States Power agreement or document of understanding of the work
(permanent and temporary) to be done within the NSP easements on the site.
If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-
4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com.
Page 1
Memo
To: Katie Larsen
From: Andy Nelson
Date: April 23, 2020
Re: Environmental Coordinator comments for Nadeau Acres RZ PP V4
(3-23-20)
Carlson McCain Comments
Staff Comments
The following recommendations were made by the Lino Lakes Environmental
Board on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 concerning Nadeau Acres:
1. Open Space Landscape standard trees must be calculated per
outlot/segment of open space, and not calculated as a total for the
entire development. In other words, existing trees in Outlot A will
not satisfy tree requirements for Outlot B, etc. Open space trees
are still required for Outlots B, E, and F.
Updated OK
2. Outlot C is a future right-of-way and will not require trees and
shrubs, but area must be seeded.
Noted OK
3. Outlot D will not require trees and shrubs because lots in this
area are going to be expanded to eliminate this outlot.
Noted OK
4. Staff will work with developer to increase within-block diversity of
boulevard trees. Ultimately, City staff will select species and
placement for boulevard trees. This will involve revisions to
placement that ensure trees are in the right-of-way and provide
Environmental
Page 2
Clear Vision Area for Local Residential Roads (Item #5 of the
Landscaping Guidelines and Technical Requirements), which
addresses visibility at intersections.
Noted
Species selected are all appropriate. City staff will work on exact
placement in the field.
5. Buffer and screen standards call for a 6 foot high continuous screen on
Block 5, Lots 7-10. Lots 7-9 should have a continuous 6 foot high berm
with the trees and shrubs planted on top, rather than the two separate
berms now called for on the plans. The existing trees on Block 5, Lot 10
should be left in place as proposed on the plan.
Noted
OK, Buffer can remain as two separate berms as shown on the plans
dated 3/23/20.
6. Tree protection zones should be 1 foot radius away from the trunk per inch
DBH (diameter at breast height), as described in the Details Plate, and
Landscape Specifications on Preliminary Landscape Plan should be
changed to match Details Plate. All Tree Protection Zones should be in
place before any other construction activity begins on the site.
Updated OK
7. Staff recommends 35-241 Mesic Prairie General to use on the portion of
Outlots A, B, and E that are above the 100 year High Water Level.
Updated OK
8. Replace Royal Purple Smoke Tree with Chokeberry in open area plantings for
more value to wildlife.
Updated OK
9. Species and placement changes for trees in outlots B and D.
Move 5 Black Hills spruce from outlot B and place them in a line at the pavement
edge of Heritage Avenue’s northern boundary (the stub).
Replace remaining 6 Black Hills spruce and 2 Canadian hemlocks in outlot B with
Swamp white, bur, or pin oaks.
Replace 6 Canadian hemlocks in outlot D with oaks.
10. Replace Seed mix 35-241 Mesic Prairie General with 35-641 Mesic Prairie
Southeast.
11. There are now 68 lots with 77 boulevard trees required, which accounts for one per
frontage. Please update this in the City of Lino Lakes Landscape Requirements on the
Preliminary Landscape Plan.
>>|||||||||||||||||||||||||ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe oh
e
o
h
e
ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
eugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueutvutvutvxxxxxx>>
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxoheohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
>>>>>>>>>>
ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe oheueueueugugutut ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
x
>>>>>>>>>>>||||||||||||>>>>xxxxxx
oheoheoheoh
e
oh
e
oh
eoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheohe
oheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheohe ohe ohe
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||ohe
ohe
ohe
ohe
>>>>>>>>>>oheoheoheoheohe>>>>|oh
e
ohe ohe ohe ohe
>>>>
>>ueue ue ue ue uexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesota VICINITY MAP ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_cover.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaCOVER12. 2/7/20 Revise Sheets 9,10,&123. 2/21/20 Revise Per City Comments4. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:EXCEPTION
ZONING: RZONING: RZONING: RZONING: PUD ZONING: R
ZONING: PUD ZONING: RCITY OF CENTERVILLEZONING: Rf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_excon.dwgSave Date:01/13/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···EXISTING CONDITIONSThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2067KCM12/06/19132LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025
HERITAGE AVENUE HERITAGEAVENUEHERITAGE AVENUEWILLIAMLANENORMA WAYJOSEPHINECOURTRED OAKRED OAKRED OAK LANE(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)20TH AVENUE S.LANELANEOWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:EXCEPTIONSEE SHEET 5ZONING: RZONING: RZONING: RZONING: PUD
ZONING: R
ZONING: PUD ZONING: RCITY OF CENTERVILLEZONING: RSEE SHEET 4f:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp index.dwgSave Date:03/23/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEXThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision2067KCM12/06/19133LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 - 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025 SITE DATA NADEAU ACRES
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:
OWNER:EXCEPTION
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUENORMA WAYJOSEPHINECOURTRED OAKRED OAK LANE20TH AVENUE SOUTH LANEREDOAKLANEf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp.dwgSave Date:03/21/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:2067KCM12/06/19134LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:HERITAGE AVENUEHERITAGEAVENUEWILLIAMLANENORMA WAY(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)f:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp.dwgSave Date:03/21/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:40361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:135LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 5502512/06/19KCM12/06/192067Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUEWILLIAMCOURTNORMA WAYRED OAKLANEJOSEPHINERED OAKRED OAK LANE(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)20TH AVENUE SOUTH LANELANEEXCEPTIONHERITAGE
AVENUEf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\ghost plat.dwgSave Date:03/20/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···GHOST PLATI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1.Revised layout. 01/10/20202.Revised layout. 02/11/20203.Revised layout. 02/21/2020XXXC#12/06/19136BL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025GHOSTPLATGHOSTPLATGHOSTPLAT
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_site.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaSITE PLAN LEGENDPRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN7PRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING INDEX82. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN92. 2/7/20 Revise Pond HWL's3. 2/21/20 Per City Comments4. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN102. 2/7/20 Revise Pond HWL's3. 2/21/20 Per City Comments
TREE PRESERVATION PLANINDEXofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT14 VICINITY MAP
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT242. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT34
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT443. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPHASING PLANP1ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_phasing_plan.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPHASE IPHASE IIPHASE IPHASE II1NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesota VICINITY MAP 2. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
1
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 02-20
ORDINANCE TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R, RURAL
TO R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR
NADEAU ACRES
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
Section 1: Findings of Fact
1. The City received a Land Use Application to rezone certain property from R,
Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
2. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 12, 2020.
3. Per Section 1007.015 (5), the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible
adverse effects of the proposed rezoning and its judgement shall be based upon,
but not limited to, the following factors:
(a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies
and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance.
Per the zoning ordinance, land that is guided low density residential can be zoned R-1,
Single Family Residential, R-1X, Single Family Executive Residential or R-2, Two Family
Residential.
The proposed Nadeau Acres residential subdivision is consistent with the goals and
policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use,
housing, transportation and utilities. The development is consistent with low density
residential land use and compliant with density requirements. Safe transportation
corridors and public utilities also serve the development.
(b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of
the area.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development is compatible with the present and future land
uses of the area. Present land uses in the area are residential. Future land uses in the
area are guided low and medium density residential.
2
(c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development conforms with the zoning ordinance
performance standards for R-1, Single Family Residential District.
(d) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will
not overburden the City’s service capacity.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development can be accommodated with existing public
services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The site is served by 8”
watermain and 8”-10”sanitary sewer, forcemain and lift station. The public water and
sanitary system is adequately sized for the development in the district.
Section 2: Amendment
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes is hereby amended to rezone the
following described property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
Section 3: Legal Description
That part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast
corner of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North along the East line of said
East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 941.14 feet to the North line of the
South 941.00 feet thereof, also being the point of beginning; thence westerly, along said
North line of the South 941.00 feet thereof, a distance of 865.13 feet to the West line of
the East 865.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence southerly, along
said westerly line, a distance of 196.03 feet to the North line of the South 745.00 feet of
said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence westerly, along said North line, a distance
of 135.02 feet to the West line of the East 1000.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter; thence southerly, along said West line, a distance of 495.07 feet to the North line
of EAST BIRCH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota; thence easterly, along said North line of EAST BIRCH ADDITION, a
distance of 611.39 feet to the Northwest corner of Outlot A, said EAST BIRCH
ADDITION; thence southerly, along the West line of said Outlot A, a distance of 190.00
feet to the southerly line of said Outlot A; thence easterly, along said southerly line said
Outlot A, a distance of 60.00 feet to the East line of said Outlot A; thence northerly,
along said East line of said Outlot A, a distance of 148.74 feet to the North line of the
South 208.71 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly, along said
North line, a distance of 120.02 feet to the West line of the East 208.71 feet of said East
Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said West line, a distance of
417.46 feet to the North line of the South 626.11 feet of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter; thence easterly, along said North line, a distance of 208.74 feet to said East line
of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said East line, a
distance of 314.94 to said point of beginning.
3
AND
That part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast
corner of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly, along the East line of
said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1100.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence
westerly along a line parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter, a distance of 610.00 feet; thence northerly, along a line parallel with the East
line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence westerly
along a line parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a
distance of 48.00 feet; thence northerly, along a line parallel with the East line of said
East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 345.00 feet; thence westerly, along a line
parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 659.7
feet, more or less, to the West line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence
southerly, along said westerly line, a distance of 919.95 feet, more or less, to the North
line of the South 745.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly,
along said northerly line, a distance of 449.55 feet, to the West line of the East 865.00
feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said West line a
distance of 196.03 feet, to the North line of the South 941.00 feet of said East Half of the
Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along said North line, a distance of 865.13 feet, to the
East line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said East
line, a distance of 158.86 feet to said point of beginning.
AND
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of and 1320.00 feet North of the Southeast corner of
said Northeast Quarter; thence North along said East line, 345.00 feet; thence West on a
line parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter 658.00 feet; thence South,
parallel with said East line of the Northeast Quarter, 345.00 feet; thence East, parallel
with said South line of the Northeast Quarter, 658.00 feet to the point of beginning,
EXCEPT that part described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees
23 minutes 08 seconds West, assumed bearing along the East line of said Northeast
Quarter, 1380.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 00 degrees 23
minutes 08 seconds West, along said East line, 285.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 24
minutes 11 seconds West, parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter, 262.00
feet; thence South 00 degrees 23 minutes 08 seconds East, 170.00 feet; thence South 31
degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds East, 135.12 feet to the North line of the South 1380.00
feet as measured along said East line of the Northeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees
24 minutes 11 seconds East, along said North line 193.00 feet to said point of beginning.
Section 4: Development Regulations
4
The development shall conform to the plans, requirements, and conditions of approval as
listed in Council Resolution No. 20-20.
Section 5: Effect
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter and upon the filing of the final plat.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-20
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND OPENING SUB-DISTRICT 3C & 3D OF
UTILITY STAGING AREA 2A (2020-2025) FOR NADEAU ACRES
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for preliminary plat for Nadeau Acres
hereafter referred to as Development; and
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the Development based on the following:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6,
2019
• Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated
December 6, 2019
• Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Inc. dated December 23, 2019
• Rare Plant Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated December 12, 2019
• Traffic Impact Study by Spack Consulting dated December 6, 2019; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February 12,
2020 and the Board recommended approval of the Development with a 2-1; and
WHEREAS, 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy requires the City Council
to determine by resolution if the next 10 year utility staging is to be opened to development; and
WHEREAS, the Development is located in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-District 3C and 3D)
of 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Preliminary Plat
Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
(1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the
following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
2
1. Land use plan;
2. Transportation plan;
3. Utility (sewer and water) plans;
4. Local water management plan;
5. Capital improvement plan; and
6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
The proposed Nadeau Acres residential subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of
the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation,
utilities, local water management, capital improvements and growth management. The
development is consistent with low density residential land use and compliant with density
requirements. Safe transportation corridors and public utilities also serve the development.
(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill
policies.
Nadeau Acres is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the 2030 Utility
Staging Area 2A (2020-2025).The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is
consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future
utility costs are proposed.
(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the
requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual.
A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Spack Solutions on December 6, 2019 and concluded
the additional 68 single family lots will not negatively impact the transportation system. Level of
Service (LOS) requirement is met.
(d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water
supply.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the water supply plan. The site is served by an 8” watermain
extending from the east and loops south to Birch Street. The water system has capacity to serve
this residential development.
(e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste
disposal systems.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the sanitary sewer plan. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer
District 3 (Sub-district 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging area 2A (2020-2025). The
sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development.
Utility Staging Area
Per the page 3-26 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy:
6. Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next ten-year staging area, or five-year phase
within a ten-year staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will
determine by resolution if the next area is to be opened to development. The following
3
criteria will be used to determine where and when to open up the next ten-year staging
area, or five-year phase within a staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on
the staging plan:
a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate
analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility
extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new
development. If infrastructure is not available and cannot be made available in a
timely manner to support expanding into the next ten-year staging area or five year
phase within a staging area, the city may refrain from opening up the next staging
area, or portions thereof.
Adequate infrastructure is available to support Nadeau Acres. The development is located in
Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-District 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A
(2020-2025). The sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development.
Nadeau Acres also meets the goals of the 2030 Transportation Plan by providing a safe road
connection between future neighborhoods, constructing turn lanes along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue)
and controlling access management along County roads.
b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one
area of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the
city. Decisions to open new areas to development should clearly define and map the
area being opened.
Only Sub-District 3C and 3D of Sanitary Sewer District 3 in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-
2025) is being opened to development.
c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in
accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
establishes the following conditions of approval:
1. Outlots A, B, C, D and E shall be deeded to the City.
2. Outlot C shall be deeded to the City and dedicated for road right-of-way and drainage and
utility purposes.
3. A temporary cul de sac easement shall be recorded over the west end of William Lane.
4. The temporary cul de sac shall be removed, ground restored and the temporary easement
released upon extension of William Lane.
5. The private septic systems at 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue shall be removed.
6. The private well at 6677 20th Avenue shall be capped.
7. The existing house at 6651 20th Avenue shall hook up to municipal sanitary sewer.
8. The existing south driveway of 6709 20th Avenue shall be relocated west onto Red Oak
Lane.
9. The existing driveway accesses from 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue shall be
removed.
10. A building permit is required for the house relocation at 6677 20th Avenue.
4
11. The property owners of PID #26-31-22-12-0006 and #26-31-22-13-0001 (Vickers) have
expressed concerns about Josephine Lane stubbing to their property line. It should be
noted that if it is decided to pull back the sanitary sewer, watermain and street
improvements along Josephine Lane, there will be an added cost to the development of
their property in the future. It should also be noted that Josephine Lane will be extended
in the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the preliminary plat and utility staging area for Nadeau Acres subject to the following
items being addressed:
1. Comments from WSB City Engineer memo dated April 27, 2020 shall be addressed.
2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated April 23, 2020 shall be
addressed.
3. It is the preferred option of the City to extend a stormwater pipe west from Pond 100 to
the ditch on the Vickers property (PID# 26-31-22-12-0006). Staff is directed to work
with the developer to provide a design for such extension, obtain easement, and
coordinate with the property owner.
4. The applicant shall prepare the deeds for Outlots A, B, C, D and E for City review and
approval prior to recording.
a. Outlot C shall be dedicated for road right-of-way and drainage and utility
purposes.
5. The applicant shall prepare the temporary cul de sac easements for City review and
approval prior to recording.
6. Proof that the private septic systems at 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue have
been properly removed shall be submitted to the City upon completion.
7. Proof that the private well located at 6677 20th Avenue has been properly capped shall be
submitted to the City upon completion.
8. The applicant shall provide approval from NSP aka Xcel Energy allowing for public and
private improvement within their easement e.g. stormwater pond, landscaping, streets,
utilities etc.
9. “Future Road Extension” signs are required at the west end of William Lane and Red
Oak Lane and at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
a. These may be shown on the final plans.
10. Sheets 3-5, Preliminary Plat:
a. On Sheet 3, the density calculations shall be revised to subtract the “Proposed
Wetlands = 0.65 acres”. The Net Density then becomes 2.27 lots/acre.
b. A minimum10 foot wide drainage and utility easement upland from the delineated
wetland boundary is required.
i. The easement on Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 shall be revised.
ii. The lot area summary Excel spreadsheet shall be revised.
c. Josephine Court shall be revised to Josephine Lane.
11. Sheet 7, Preliminary Site & Utility Plan:
a. Southbound left, right and through lanes from CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) onto Red
Oak Lane shall be approved by Anoka County.
b. Proper turn lanes from Red Oak Lane onto CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) are required.
c. Utilities and services shall be provided for the future development of 6687 20th
Avenue on the final plans.
12. Sheet 9, Preliminary Grading Plan & Erosion Control Plan:
5
a. Revise comment “Ex. House to be Moved to Lot 136” to Lot 135.
13. Sheet L1 & L2, Preliminary Landscape Plan:
a. A row of coniferous trees shall be planted at the north end of Heritage Avenue to
provide a screen from vehicle headlights shining into the adjacent house located at
6747 20th Avenue.
14. Phasing Plan:
a. Phase I shall be revised to 35 lots.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: May 11 , 2020
TOPIC: Nadeau Acres
i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 02-20 Rezoning
Property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-20 Approving Preliminary
Plat and Opening Sub-District 3C & 3D of Utility Staging
Area 2A (2020-2025)
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff presented Nadeau Acres to the City Council at the March 2, 2020 and May 4, 2020 Work
Session. The following is an update since the May 4th Work Session:
Stormwater Outlet. Staff met with the adjacent property owners (Vickers) on Thursday, May
7, 2020 to review options for a stormwater outlet. The owners explained their concerns over
possible ditch erosion and ongoing maintenance concerns. As noted at the work session, if an
easement is obtained, the City will be responsible for ongoing maintenance of the
improvements including the outlet area. The owner informed staff of their preference for a
piped outlet with a dissipater still incorporated with the understanding that it is city maintained.
Staff is working with the developer’s engineer on a modified design.
Great River Energy (GRE) Easement. The power line easement, running north/south, is owned
by Great River Energy. The developer received approval from GRE on Tuesday, May 5, 2020
for work within the easement based on the existing plans. They are following up with GRE on
a plan amendment to extend pipe across to ditch. Since the existing approvals include both
sanitary, water and storm sewer lines, within the easement, we are not expecting any issues
with the new extension.
Josephine Lane and Utility Extension. The Vickers have raised concerns regarding the impact
of street, sewer, and water extension to their property line (Josephine Lane). Staff’s
discussions with the County Assessor’s office have indicated that the development of the
Nadeau Property, not the proximity of sewer/water utility and street improvement to the
property line, will drive any potential increase in value. However, staff is evaluating with the
developers’ engineer an option to pull back the sanitary, water main and street improvements
closer to the intersection. However in doing so, there will be an added cost to development of
the Vickers property in the future. Staff would also note that if the street is pulled back, it
2
should be clear in the meeting record that the street will be extended in future. The extension
of street stubs often becomes controversial after residents have moved in. Josephine Lane will
be a through street providing access to 20th Avenue from the Vickers property and it will need
to be clearly marked.
Staff is requesting City Council consideration of rezoning and preliminary plat for Nadeau
Acres.
Complete Application Date: January 13, 2020
60-Day Review Deadline: March 13, 2020
120-Day Review Deadline: May 12, 2020
Environmental Board Meeting: January 29, 2020
Park Board Meeting: NA
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: February 12, 2020
City Council Work Session: March 2 & May 4, 2020
City Council Meeting: May 11 , 2020
BACKGROUND
The applicant, BL Holdings, LLC, submitted a rezoning and preliminary plat land use
application for Nadeau Acres. The proposed single family residential development is located
north of CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and west of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) across from NorthPointe.
It contains two (2) parcels totaling approximately 33 gross acres. The applicant is proposing an
R-1, Single Family Residential development on standard 80 foot wide lots. The initial plans
presented to the Planning & Zoning Board on February 12, 2020 and the Council Work Session
proposed 69 single family lots. The revised plan increases the size of Pond 100 for additional
stormwater management, relocates the lift station and eliminates 1 single family lot. The total
number of single family lots is now 68.
The Land Use Applications are:
• Rezone property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential
• Preliminary Plat
This staff report is based on review the following plan sets and documents:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20,
2020
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6,
2019
• Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated
December 6, 2019
3
• Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Inc. dated December 23, 2019
• Rare Plant Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated December 12, 2019
• Traffic Impact Study by Spack Consulting dated December 6, 2019
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
The 30 acre site contains two (2) parcels currently addressed 6651 & 6677 20th Avenue and is
located north of CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and west of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) across from
NorthPointe. The site consists of two (2) single family houses, accessory buildings,
agricultural hay fields, and wetlands. The house located at 6677 20th Avenue will be moved
onto a new lot and the house located at 6651 20th Avenue will remain in place. Accessory
buildings will also be relocated. The existing septic systems shall be removed and wells
capped. One NSP utility transmission overhead electric line runs north-south along the west
boundary line and another NSP utility transmission line bisects the site diagonally. Both lines
are covered by easements. Topography of the site generally slopes downward from the
southeast to the northwest at elevations ranging from 925 EL to 905 EL. Groundwater was
encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 19 feet. Topsoil was encountered at ½ to 1 foot.
Below the topsoil, soils consist of glacial outwash sands and native clayey glacial till and are
classified as hydrologic groups HSG D in the southern portion and HSG C in the north.
Land Use and Zoning
Current and Proposed Zoning
The property is currently zoned R, Rural and is guided for low density residential land use. Per
the zoning ordinance, land that is guided low density residential can be zoned R-1, Single
Family Residential, R-1X, Single Family Executive Residential or R-2, Two Family
Residential.
The property is proposed to be rezoned to R-1, Single Family Residential. The R-1 zoning
provides a natural transition from the current PUD, Planned Unit Development (R-2, Two-
Family) zoning in the NorthPointe development to the east and the future medium density land
use to the north in Lino Lakes and the northwest in the City of Centerville.
At the time of submittal, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was under review by Met Council and
not formally adopted by the City Council. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is still in effect.
Current Zoning R, Rural
Proposed Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential
Current Land Use Rural Residential
2030 Future Land Use Low Density Residential
(1.6 to 3.9 units per acre)
2040 Future Land Use Low Density Residential
4
(1.6 to 3.0 units per acre)
2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025)
2040 Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025)
Density
The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density.
Gross Area (acres) 33.03
Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.65)
Public Parks & Open Space 0.00
Arterial ROW (0.74)
Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (1.69)
Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00
Net Area (acres) 29.95
# of Units 68
Gross Density (units/acre) 2.06
Net Density (units/acre) 2.27
Per the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is guided for low density residential
development which requires a density of 1.6 to 3.9 and 1.6 to 3.0 units per acres, respectively.
The proposed net density is 2.27 units per acre which is consistent with the 2030 & 2040
Comprehensive Plan’s guided land use and density.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use
North R, Rural Rural Residential Medium Density
Sewered Residential
South R, Rural Single Family
Residential
Low Density Sewered
Residential
East PUD Single Family
Residential
Medium Density
Sewered Residential
5
West R, Rural Agricultural Low Density Sewered
Residential
Zoning Requirements
The property is proposed to be rezoned from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
R-1
Requirements Nadeau Acres
Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf Ave. 14,120 sf
Min. Lot Width
-Interior Lot 80 ft 80 ft
-Corner Lot 100 ft 100 ft
Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 135 ft
Double Frontage Lots 145 ft 145 ft
Building Setback
-From Streets
--Local Street 30 ft 30 ft
--Collector or Arterial 40 ft 40 ft
--Corner lot 30 ft 30 ft
-Rear
--Principal 30 ft 30 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
-Side
--Principal 10 ft 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
--Corner lot 30 ft 30 ft
Buffer
15’ if side or
rear lot abuts
collector or
arterial street
15 ft buffer
provided along
CSAH 54
Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land
exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot
development. The applicant submitted a spreadsheet detailing that minimum lot areas are
10,800 sf. The average lot size is 14,120 sf.
6
Building Type and Construction
At the time of building permit, each individual single family dwelling unit will be reviewed for
compliance with Section 1007.043(2)(a), General Building Provisions and Section
1007.090(4), Building Requirements regarding floor area, garage and design and construction
standards.
Per Section 1007.042(5)(b)1.e., air conditioning or heating equipment shall be five (5) feet
from any rear lot line and ten (10) feet from any side lot line. No encroachment shall be
permitted in existing or required drainage and utility easements.
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential
development. The preliminary plat is also compliant with zoning ordinance performance
standards for the R-1 zoning district with some minor revisions.
Blocks and Lots
The preliminary plat has been revised from 69 single family lots to 68 and from 6 outlots to 5.
The outlots are for the following purposes:
Outlot Purpose
A Wetland and Stormwater Pond 400
B Stormwater Pond 100
C Road Easement for Future Development of
6687 20th Avenue
D Omitted NSP Easement Corridor
E D Stormwater Pond 200
F E Trail Corridor and Watermain Loop
On the original preliminary plat, Outlot D contained NSP easement and storm sewer pipe. To
minimize the City’s responsibility of mowing and maintaining manicured grass in this area, the
outlot has been omitted and the lot lines extended through the NSP easement.
The other outlots will be deeded to the City for ownership and maintenance.
Streets and Alleys
Internal road right-of-way widths are 60 feet and the paved roadway width is 32 feet back to
back. This is consistent with the City’s engineering standards. Cul de sac paved widths have
been revised to 32 feet back to back.
7
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) is classified as an A-Minor Arterial Reliever and requires a full 120
feet of dedicated road right-of-way. The plat dedicates 60 feet of road right-of-way from
section line as required. Turn lane plans have been submitted to Anoka County for review and
comment.
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) is classified as a Major Collector road along the section of the
proposed development and requires a full 80 feet of road dedicated right-of-way. The section of
the plat that abuts CSAH 34 (Birch Street) previously dedicated 60 feet of road right-of-way.
No further road right-of-way is required.
The length of Red Oak Lane cul de sac is 250 ft and Norma Way is 350ft. No permanent cul de
sac length exceeds 500 feet as required by ordinance. Length requirements do not apply to
temporary cul de sacs such as William Lane.
A temporary cul de sac and easement are shown on the west end of William Lane. A separate
recordable easement document will be recorded against the property and shall be terminated
upon extension of William Lane. The future developer will be responsible for removal of the
temporary cul de sac and restoration of the lot.
Private Driveway-6709 20th Avenue
In September 2015, the Nadeau’s owned and subdivided off the1 acre house parcel located at
6709 20th Avenue. Through the minor subdivision process, staff recommended the north
driveway be removed and the south driveway access Red Oak Lane upon its extension. The
Nadeau’s expressed concerns about removing the north driveway stating personal cars and
trucks could not turn left into the garage from the south driveway without backing into the
County road right-of-way. Staff agreed to leave the north driveway with the stipulation the
south driveway be removed when the southbound turn lane into NorthPointe was constructed.
Unfortunately, this south driveway onto CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) still remains. The driveway
will need to be relocated to the west upon extension of Red Oak Lane due to its close proximity
to the intersection.
Staff Comments:
• The applicant shall draft and record a temporary cul de sac easement.
• The cul de sac shall be removed and the temporary easement released upon extension of
William Lane.
• “Future Road Extension” signs are required at the west end of William Lane and Red
Oak Lane and at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided along all lot lines.
Drainage and utility easements are also dedicated over the outlots.
Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control
8
A Storm Water Management Plan has been prepared by a licensed, professional engineer and
reviewed for compliance by licensed, professional engineers from both WSB & Associates
(City) and Houston Engineering (RCWD). The revised plan increases the size of Pond 100 and
includes a plunge pool energy dissipator for additional stormwater management.
Per the revised March 20, 2020 Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain:
“The stormwater on the site flows to three different locations from the site. The majority of
the site drains to an existing private ditch/wetland area to the north of the site. A small portion
at the south of the site drains through an existing culvert along Birch St (CSAH 34). The
western portion of the site drains to the northwest to an existing private ditch.
The surface water will flow through three new ponds. Pond 200 located in the middle of the site
will pick up surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100.
Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the majority of the site and discharge to the west to
an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an
existing ditch to the north.
After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 8.8 acres of new impervious
surfaces including the streets, sidewalks, paths, parking lots, and rooftops. Due to poor soils in
the south portion of the site and a high groundwater table in the north portion of the site,
infiltration is not feasible.
The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the
storm sewer conveyance system and ponds. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for
the 2-, 10-, and 100-year rainfall events.”
Per the April 27, 2020 WSB City Engineer’s Review Memo:
“During the public hearing held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on February 12,
2020 there were a number of questions regarding the proposed developments’ stormwater
management plan. Below is a summary of findings and actions to address the questions:
• The site outlets to two private ditches, one in the northwest, and one to the north. There
is also a small area of the site that drains to the south.
• The proposed project is required to mitigate surface water and address water quality
through City, Watershed District and State Rules and Statues. This includes maintaining
the existing rate or reducing the rate of runoff from the site, and providing water quality
treatment for the proposed development. The project meets the City of Lino Lakes’
stormwater management requirements and RCWD rules. RCWD approved a CAPROC
on April 8, 2020.
o This project is proposing to reduce rates as detailed in the Stormwater Report,
and will utilize stormwater ponding for water quality treatment. The stormwater
management plan incorporates existing soils and time of concentrations to
calculate the needed ponding systems to mitigate the new impervious surfaces.
o The surface water from the new impervious surfaces will be accommodated
through three new ponds. Pond 200, located in the middle of the site, will pick
up surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond
9
100. Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the northwest portion of the site
and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will receive the
remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
o The design includes a standard outlet control structure with pipe outlet. An
outlet control structure is a device that holds water back in the proposed pond
and then discharges it slowly into the ditch so that the flow to the downstream
ditch is less than the existing condition flow into the ditch.
o The original design included an outlet pipe to the ditch. The applicant was
unable to obtain an easement for the outlet pipe to the ditch as required by the
City and RCWD. The applicant revised the design and enlarged the pond to
provide additional storage and added a plunge pool dissipater at the discharge
location.
• Adjacent property owners expressed concerns over the s stormwater runoff from the site
and the downstream private ditches. Staff had multiple conversations and Zoom
meetings with the property owners to better understand their concerns and explain the
existing and proposed conditions. This included an onsite evaluation, reviewing
topographic data, record plans, survey, and incorporation of the NorthPointe
development drainage plan. The downstream systems appear to be working correctly
and the NorthPointe development has reduced the surface water flow to the
subwatershed in question. We will continue to work the property owners and provide
information and findings.
o The adjacent private ditch owners are responsible to perpetuate existing runoff
rates and are to maintain the ditch flow through their property. Staff reviewed
private ditch requirements with the City Attorney and RCWD staff.
o 2019 was a record year for rainwater in Minneapolis-St. Paul area according to
the Minnesota DNR Year to Date Precipitation Chart. Soil saturation in the fall
of 2019 was similar to a spring snow melt condition where typically the fall is a
dryer condition. These conditions have led to standing water due to soil
saturation and higher flows in conveyance systems.
o We are working with one of the downstream property owner to complete culvert
maintenance on their property.
• In addition, we are having the developer verify the downstream conditions to confirm
their assumptions.”
Per the RCWD CAPROC dated April 8, 2020:
Soil conditions vary over the sloping site, with HSG D sandy lean clays (CL) at the higher
elevations, and HSG A/B poorly graded sands and sands with silt (SP/SP-SM) with sandy lean
clays below. The HSG D soils in addition to the high water table below the HSG A/B soils
make infiltration infeasible for the site. Thus, stormwater ponds are acceptable to meet the
water quality requirement. The pond sizing, and outlets and overflows are consistent with
design criteria. 100% of the project area either flows to the ponds or meets design criteria.
Additional TSS removal is not required. The applicant has met all the Water Quality
requirements and the design criteria of RCWD Rule C: Stormwater Management Plans.
10
2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs)
Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed
North to Private Ditch 3.5 2.3 5.1 3.9 6.9 5.7
West to Private Ditch 11.6 9.2 34.1 28.7 82.8 74.7
South through
Culvert under Birch
Street
4.4 3.5 8.0 6.5 14.6 11.9
Totals* 19.2 12.5 46.7 35.6 103.3 87.8
*Difference due to time of concentration
Post-development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre-development rates.
Phasing
The site will be mass graded in one (1) phase and developed in two (2) phases. Phase 1 has 35
lots and Phase 2 has 33 lots.
Utilities
Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development.
Sanitary Sewer
An 8”-10” sanitary sewer pipe, 4” forcemain and lift station will serve the site.
Both existing houses located at 6651 and 6677 20th Avenue are served by private septic
systems. The house located at 6677 20th Avenue is being relocated onto a new lot in the
subdivision. Both houses are required to connect to the municipal sanitary sewer system.
Watermain
An 8” watermain will extend and loop from the east (NorthPointe) along Red Oak and from the
south (Birch Street) and serve the site.
The house located at 6651 20th Avenue is connected to municipal city water. The relocated
house will also connect to municipal city water.
Public Land Dedication
The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Per the City’s Park, Greenway & Trail
System Plan, a future neighborhood park is programmed to the west of this site. See
Attachment #3. Sidewalks along the streets in the development will connect to future trail
corridors along CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). A 300 foot long trail will
be constructed in Outlot F and will terminate at the lot line. This trail segment will eventually
connect to a future trail along the north side of Birch Street. Terminating the trail at the lot line
now will prevent vehicles from confusing the trail with a road. Credit will be given for the
construction cost of the trail extension to Birch Street.
11
Nadeau Acres
68 lots x $3,150 = $214,200
-Trail Construction Cost TBD
TOTAL = TBD
Tree Preservation
The Environmental Coordinator and Environmental Board reviewed the tree preservation and
landscape plans.
The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest
resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The Tree
Inventory Report prepared by Carlson McCain revised January 10, 2020 identifies 750
significant trees on site. Eighty-eight (88) trees were identified as non-significant (e.g. ash
trees, elm trees etc.) and will be removed without mitigation requirements. Of the remaining
662 trees, 252 trees will be saved and 410 will be removed. Sheet T4, Tree Preservation Plan
identifies the basic use area and environmentally sensitive areas. Five (5) trees are being
removed within the natural resource conservation area. Fourteen (14) trees are being removed
from the non-ESA and non-basic use areas. This requires 29 replacement trees for mitigation
which are provided throughout the development.
Landscaping
Open area landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 sf. Existing
trees on site may be used to satisfy open area landscaping requirements if applicable by
placement. This would only apply to the existing trees on Outlot A. The landscaping plan has
been revised to provide adequate open space mitigation for Outlots B, D and E. Outlots C does
not require mitigation because it is for future right-of way.
Buffer and screen standards apply along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue), specifically Block 4, Lots 12-
15 that have a rear frontage on 20th Avenue. Approximately 475 linear feet of frontage will be
screened by shrubs, new trees, and existing trees to provide a continuous planting screen year-
round. The Preliminary Landscape Plan shows trees and shrubs planted on two separate berms.
It was suggested these berms be combined to provide a continuous berm; however, an opening
between the 2 berms is needed to provide rear yard drainage. A triangulated row of coniferous
trees will be planted in addition to the berms that will provide appropriate screening.
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family. There
are 68 single family lots that require 77 boulevard trees (interior and corner lots). Seventy-nine
(79) trees are proposed which is compliant with the ordinance.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
The site is not within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR; therefore, no mitigation is required.
12
Traffic Study
A Traffic Study was prepared by Spack Solutions on December 6, 2019. The study was based
on a concept plan with 74 single family homes. Based on ITE standards and local data collected
by Spack Solutions, the development is forecasted to generate approximately 685 new trips per
day with 50 new trips in the a.m. peak hours (7-8am) and 65 trips in the p.m. peak hours (4:30 -
5:30pm).
Traffic impacts are analyzed in terms of volume and capacity. Volume quantifies how many
vehicles are using the road and capacity quantifies the number of vehicles the road can
accommodate.
Traffic Volumes
Roadway Location
Existing
Daily
Volumes1
2040
Forecasted
Daily
Volumes2
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) North of Red Oak Lane 5,300/6,100 14,000
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) South of Red Oak Lane 5,600/6,100 14,000
CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) South of CSAH 34 (Birch St) 2,900/3,000 14,000
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) West of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) 3,500/3,150 10,000
1Spack Video Data Collection/2018 AADT Volumes
2Anoka County’s 2040 Transportation Plan
Existing traffic volumes near the site are between 5,300-5,600 AADT (annual average daily
traffic). Nadeau Acres will generate approximately 685 new trips per day. These new trips
added to the existing daily trips are significantly less than the 2040 forecasted daily volumes.
Traffic Capacity
A ratio of volume to capacity is used to analyze traffic congestion. A road with a volume to
capacity ratio of 1.0 means the traffic volume is nearly equal to the traffic capacity and will feel
congested to motorists. Per the traffic study, three (3) sections of roadways (20th Ave north of
Birch St, 20th Ave south of Birch St and Birch St) were analyzed under Existing, 2024 No-
Build and 2024 Build scenarios. No volume to capacity ratio exceeded 0.45. None of study
roadways are expected to exceed their daily capacities.
Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions of an intersection. Facilities
are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions).
Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance establishes
minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or
13
B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is
C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to
ensure a LOS of D or better.
Existing Peak Hour LOS Proposed Peak Hour LOS
Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
20th Ave & Red Oak Lane B B C C
20th Ave & Birch Street B C B C
The proposed Levels of Service do not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore the
subdivision is not considered premature.
The project is also under review by Anoka County Highway Department. They have identified
the need for right and left turn lanes on CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). These details shall be
provided by the developer.
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) Corridor Study
In April 2011, Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes hired SRF Consulting Group to
develop a corridor study along CSAH 34 (Birch Street). Per the recommended corridor plan,
future full-access intersections near Nadeau Acres are every ¼ mile. No access (full or partial)
is proposed onto CSAH 34 (Birch Street) from Nadeau Acres. A pedestrian (trail or sidewalk)
corridor will connect Nadeau Acres to Birch Street.
I-35E/CR J/Centerville Road
Staff is aware of current traffic concerns at I-35E/CR J/Centerville Road but these are outside
the scope of Nadeau Acres. These interchanges are currently under evaluation by other
government agencies. Ramsey County is working on a federal transportation funding
application to reconstruct bridge and ramp terminals and CR J/Centerville Road intersection.
Local and County staffs are also working with state representatives on possible preliminary
design funding in the State’s bonding bill. Anoka County is also considering a transportation
funding application for improvement of the Centerville Road/CR J intersection.
Wetlands
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report dated
October 29, 2019. A Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 11, 2019.
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Permit Application dated
December 23, 2019. Per the report, two (2) wetlands were delineated on site totaling 1.37 acres.
Wetland 1 is a Type 1 wet meadow wetland. Wetland 2 is a partially-drained, wet meadow and
scrub-shrub wetland. A portion of Wetland 2 southwest of the septic mound discharge outlet
was created in upland and is incidental.
The proposed project will require 30,826 square feet (sf) (0.7076 acre) of permanent
14
impact to four (4) wetland areas, one of which is incidental for WCA permitting. Replacement
will be accomplished via the purchase of wetland banking credits.
The site is inside of the boundaries of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and
Management Plan (CWPMP) area; however, onsite wetlands do not fall within the landscape
scale/preliminary Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Therefore, no WMC buffer on
wetlands is required with site development.
Rare & Endangered Species
Per the December 12, 2019 report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources, no habitats for state-
listed plant species were observed during field review. No further surveys are recommended.
Floodplain
There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
At the time of this staff report, the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan is under review by the Met
Council and has not formally been adopted by the City of Lino Lakes. Therefore, the 2030
Comprehensive Plan is in effect.
Nadeau Acres is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to
resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities.
Resource Management System Plan
Goals of the Resource Management System Plan include:
• Natural Resources and Amenities
o Goal #1: Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological
and aquatic resources of the community.
• Land Use Policies
o Goal #1: Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial
and institutional development to accommodate the city’s projected growth needs
occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the city’s natural resources
and amenities.
The Nadeau Acres protects the natural resource by providing storm water management and
vege tative buffers.
Land Use Plan
Goal 1: Create a unified vision and future for the city, promote a well-planned community,
prevent fragmented development, address the impacts of development and redevelopment on
natural resources, aesthetics and view corridors, and provide balanced land use and
connectivity that ensures the integration of both sides of the regional park.
15
Goal 2: Ensure that zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps are consistent with
the intent and specific direction provided within the Comprehensive Plan.
Policies:
1. Ensure developers meet the standards specified within the land-use plan and official
controls, including zoning and subdivision ordinances and official maps.
2. Ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses.
Nadeau Acres meets the land use goals by developing a single family residential subdivision
that is consistent with low density residential development as guided by the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan. Low density residential development allows for 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre.
The net density for the development is 2.27 units per net acre. This is consistent with density
requirements.
Housing Plan
Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and
provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. Policies include linking
trails to parks, lakes and schools.
Nadeau Acres meets the goal of the housing plan. The development is compatible with the
existing adjacent residential homes. Sidewalk/trail will provide corridors to future trails along
CSAH 54(20th Avenue) and CSAH 34 (Birch Street).
Economic Development
Nadeau Acres does not negatively impact the city’s economic development goals.
Transportation Plan
Goal 1: Plan for and achieve required street improvements and connectivity throughout the
City of Lino Lakes.
Goal 2: Ensure that streets and roads are as safe as possible.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the 2030 Transportation Plan by providing a safe road
connection between future neighborhoods, constructing turn lanes along CSAH 54 (20th
Avenue) and controlling access management along County roads.
Sanitary Sewer Plan
Goal 1: Ensure that well-planned, quality residential, commercial, industrial and institutional
development to accommodate the City's projected growth needs occurs in a manner that also
conserves and enhances the city's natural resources and amenities.
Goal 5: Maintain the City's residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer
system.
16
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the sanitary sewer plan. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer
District 3 (Sub-district 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025). The
sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development. The sanitary sewer system will
also be oversized to accommodate future development to the north and west.
Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy, the City Council will
determine by resolution if the next 10 year, 2A (2020-2025) staging area shall be opened to
development. Resolution No. 20-20 details the findings of fact.
Water Supply Plan
Goal 4: Provide the City's residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe
and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the water supply plan. The site is served by an 8” watermain
extending from the east and loops south to Birch Street. The water system has capacity to serve
this residential development.
Environmental Board Comments
The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed preliminary plat on January 29, 2020. They
recommended approval of the project with conditions listed in the April 23, 2020 Memo from
the Environmental Coordinator. Conditions include minor revisions to the open space
landscaping, boulevard tree diversity and suggested tree species.
Final Plat
A land use application for final plat and Development Agreement shall be required.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 12, 2020. Board and resident
comments included questions about access to NorthPointe Park, grading and drainage,
driveway and turn lane construction, vehicle headlight glare and wetland impacts.
The Board recommended approval with a 2-1 vote.
Findings of Fact
The Findings of Fact for the rezoning, preliminary plat and utility staging area are detailed in
Ordinance No. 02-20 and Resolution No. 20-20, respectively.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Board and staff recommend approval of the rezoning and preliminary
plat for Nadeau Acres with conditions listed in the resolution.
17
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial Map
2. Future Land Use Map
3. Neighborhood Service Area Park Map
4. City Engineer Review Memo dated April 27, 2020
5. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated April 23, 2020
6. Revised Preliminary Plan Set dated March 20, 2020 prepared by Carlson McCain
7. Ordinance No. 02-20
8. Resolution No. 20-20
0 300 600150
Feet
662066201929192919691969
66776677
66256625
19491949
66336633
66516651
19091909
66876687
67286728
20092009
1997199719891989
20082008
205120512015201520212021202720272033203320392039
2050205020442044203820382032203220262026202020202014201420562056
67096709
CHESTNUT STCHESTNUT STCCYYPPRREESSSSSSTTCOTTONWOOD AVECOTTONWOOD AVER ED O A K L NRED O A K L N
RR
OOSSEEWW OOOODD SSTT
R O S E WO O D S TROSEWOOD S T
Aerial MapNadeau Acres µ
CSAH 34 (Birch Street)CSAH 54 (20th Avenue)
0 600 1,200300
Feet
IJ84
§¨¦I-35E
OOTTTTEERRLLAAKKEERRDDCCEE DDAA RR SS TT
ALBERT CTALBERT CTCC YY PP RREE SSSS SS TT
CCYYPPRREESSSSSSTTBUTTERNUT STBUTTERNUT ST
CHESTNUT STCHESTNUT STCOTTONWOOD AVECOTTONWOOD AVER ED W O O D STR ED W O O D STTTAARRTTLLAAKKEE
RRDD
LLAA CC AASSSSEEDD RR
CCLLEEAARRWWAATTEERRCCRREE EEKK CCTT
2211SSTTAAVVEESSR ED OA K L NRED OA K L N
TELE DRTELE DR
LLAANNGGEERRLL
NN21ST AVE21ST AVERR EE DD WW OO OO DD CC TTTELE LNTELE LNRROOSSEEWW OOOODD SSTT
CEDAR STCEDAR ST
RR OO SS EE WW OOOODDSSTT PALM STPALM STFuture Land Use MapNadeau Acres µ
Legend
Future Land Use 2030 (S tantec)Future Land Use 2030 (Stantec)
Permanent Rural
Urban Reserve
Low Density Sewered Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Mixed Use
Industrial
Civic/Institutional
Park and Open Space
Private Airfield
Right-of-Way
Open Water
I-35W
10-10
Figure 10-2� Park Service Areas
kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kjkj
kj
kj
kj
ú
úúBaldwin Lake
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilkinson
Lake
Otter Lake
Amelia
Lake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
Centerville
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
Li l a c
S t
20th Ave S456721
456749
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456754
456754
456714456714
20thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")140
")84
")84
Ma in
StMainStMain St
Cedar
St
HodgsonRdLake DrElm St
Birch St
Birch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr62nd St N
Ash St RondeauLakeRd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th St
A
B C
D
E
I
J
H
F GK
L
M
N
White Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of Columbus
City of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview
!2
!3
!4
!5
!7
!10
!11 !12 !13 !14
!15
!16
!17
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!18
!1
!6
!8
!9
´
Figure 10-2
Neighborhood Service Areas
Legend
City of Centerville
kj Future Neighborhood Park
Search Area's
ú Existing Tunnel
ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge
Existing Asphalt
Existing Concrete Trail
Existing Boardwalk Trail
Proposed Trails
Existing Regional Trail
Proposed Regional Trail
Greenway System
Undeveloped Park City
Property
City Parks
Regional Parks
School
Neighborhood Park Service
Area
Open Water
Municipal Boundary
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019
1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchw ood A cres
2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow P onds O/S
3 C ity H all Park 12 C ountry Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake E states O/S
4 C entury Farm N orth 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park
5 B ehm's Park 14 Pheasants H ill Park 23 Brandy w ood Park
6 H ighland M eadow P ark 15 N orth Pointe Park 24 Recreation C omplex
7 Lino P ark 16 C learw ater C reek O/S 25 Woods of Baldw in Park
8 Sunset Oaks P ark 17 C learw ater C reek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park
9 M arshan P ark 18 Shenandoah Park
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes
From: Kelsey Gelhar, WSB & Associates
Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes
Date: April 27, 2020
Re: Nadeau Acres Preliminary Plat Review 15306-000
WSB has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Utility Plans for the Nadeau Acres development in Lino Lakes,
MN, prepared by Carlson McCain. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and
documents:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6, 2019, and revised March
20, 2020.
• Turn Lane Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain received March 30, 2020
• Turn Lane Grading Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain received March 30, 2020
Carlson McCain responded to these comments in red. WSB reviewed the following and responded to Carlson
McCain’s comments in blue:
Engineering
• Grading
The Nadeau Acres development includes site grading for Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, Josephine Court,
Norma Way, and William Lane as well as the grading required for building pads, and Ponds 100, 200, and
400. Four retaining walls are proposed on the site.
Comments:
1. Add additional labels to both existing and proposed contours.
Labels added.
2. Retaining walls #1 & #4 shall be eliminated and the applicant shall obtain temporary grading
easements with adjacent property owners or the applicant shall adjust the grading plans to
eliminate the need for the walls.
Retaining wall #1 revised. This wall cannot be removed entirely due to the lift station location
and the unlikelihood of obtaining a grading easement from adjacent owner. This wall can be
removed with future development to the north. Retaining Wall #4 removed and grading revised
to maintain all grading on-site. Developer looking into the possibility of removing walls 2 & 3 if
adjacent owner will allow slope grading onto their property.
Retaining wall #1 eliminated due to new lift station location.
3. Additional topographic information is needed (minimum 100’ beyond preliminary plat boundary,
including at the extensions of Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, William Lane)
Lidar added to existing topo to show this area.
Current page layout does not show 100’ beyond the north limit of the project site.
4. Retaining walls #2 and #3 (now #1 and #2) exceed maximum allowed height. All retaining walls over
4-ft tall require structural design.
Noted. These walls will be designed by a structural engineer and plans provided by the contractor.
How will the retaining walls be maintained in the future?
5. Additional rear yard drainage and utility easement required on Lot 145.
Lots revised so no drainage from adjacent lot drains into Lot 145.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 2
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Grading revised. See comment 10 under the Stormwater Management section.
6. 10 foot side yard drainage and utility easement required on Lot 101.
Revised
7. 10 foot side yard drainage and utility easement required on Lots158 and 159.
Revised.
Now lots 157 & 158, side yard drainage and utility easement added.
8. Drainage swales do not meet minimum 2% requirement at the following locations: rear lot line of
Lots 116, 117,119, 121.
Slopes revised
Lot numbers have changed, but grading in the areas mentioned has been updated.
9. Grade break elevations needed on Lots 124, 139, 165.
Spot elevations added at right-of-way for rear yard swale slope verification.
Lot numbers have changed, but grading has been updated.
10. The development is a two-phase development. It is anticipated that grading for the entire site
and for the stormwater ponds will be completed at once and not in two phases.
Noted.
11. Provide construction details for the turf maintenance accesses. Individual lot surveys will be required to
include the turf maintenance access locations (Lots 2 & 3 of Block 1, Lots 6 & 7 of Block 2, and Lots 7 &
8 of Block 6).
Maintenance access detail added to detail sheet 12
• Stormwater Management
The stormwater on the site flows to three different locations from the site. The majority of the site drains to an
existing private ditch/wetland area to the north of the site. A small portion at the south of the site drains through
an existing culvert along Birch St (CSAH 34). The western portion of the site drains to the northwest to an
existing private ditch.
The surface water will flow through three new ponds. Pond 200 located in the middle of the site will pick up
surface water from the south portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100. Pond 100 will pick up surface
water from the northwest portion of the site and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400 will
receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 8.8 acres of new impervious surfaces including
the streets, sidewalks, paths, parking lots, and rooftops. Due to poor soils in the south portion of the site and a
high groundwater table in the north portion of the site, infiltration is not feasible.
Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4 to 19 feet. Topsoil was encountered at ½ to 1 foot.
Below the topsoil, soils consist of glacial outwash sands and native clayey glacial till and are classified as
hydrologic groups HSG D in the southern portion and HSG C in the north.
The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer
conveyance system and ponds. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year
rainfall events.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year
Pre-Development 18.9 19.2
46.4 46.7
103.4 103.3
Post-Development 13.1 12.5
41.7 35.6
91.9 87.8
Post-development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre-development rates.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 3
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
During the public hearing held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on February 12, 2020 there were a
number of questions regarding the proposed developments’ stormwater management plan. Below is a summary
of findings and actions to address the questions:
• The site outlets to two private ditches, one in the northwest, and one to the north. There is also a small
area of the site that drains to the south.
• The proposed project is required to mitigate surface water and address water quality through City,
Watershed District and State Rules and Statues. This includes maintaining the existing rate or reducing
the rate of runoff from the site, and providing water quality treatment for the proposed
development. The project meets the City of Lino Lakes’ stormwater management requirements and
RCWD rules. RCWD approved a CAPROC on April 8, 2020.
o This project is proposing to reduce rates as detailed in the Stormwater Report, and will utilize
stormwater ponding for water quality treatment. The stormwater management plan
incorporates existing soils and time of concentrations to calculate the needed ponding systems
to mitigate the new impervious surfaces.
o The surface water from the new impervious surfaces will be accommodated through three new
ponds. Pond 200, located in the middle of the site, will pick up surface water from the south
portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100. Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the
northwest portion of the site and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400
will receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north.
o The design includes a standard outlet control structure with pipe outlet. An outlet control
structure is a device that holds water back in the proposed pond and then discharges it slowly
into the ditch so that the flow to the downstream ditch is less than the existing condition flow
into the ditch.
o The original design included an outlet pipe to the ditch. The applicant was unable to obtain an
easement for the outlet pipe to the ditch as required by the City and RCWD. The applicant
revised the design and enlarged the pond to provide additional storage and added a plunge
pool dissipater at the discharge location.
• Adjacent property owners expressed concerns over the s stormwater runoff from the site and the
downstream private ditches. Staff had multiple conversations and Zoom meetings with the property
owners to better understand their concerns and explain the existing and proposed conditions. This
included an onsite evaluation, reviewing topographic data, record plans, survey, and incorporation of
the NorthPointe development drainage plan. The downstream systems appear to be working correctly
and the NorthPointe development has reduced the surface water flow to the subwatershed in question.
We will continue to work the property owners and provide information and findings.
o The adjacent private ditch owners are responsible to perpetuate existing runoff rates and are
to maintain the ditch flow through their property. Staff reviewed private ditch requirements with
the City Attorney and RCWD staff.
o 2019 was a record year for rainwater in Minneapolis-St. Paul area according to the Minnesota
DNR Year to Date Precipitation Chart. Soil saturation in the fall of 2019 was similar to a spring
snow melt condition where typically the fall is a dryer condition. These conditions have led to
standing water due to soil saturation and higher flows in conveyance systems.
o We are working with one of the downstream property owner to complete culvert maintenance
on their property.
• In addition, we are having the developer verify the downstream conditions to confirm their assumptions.
Comments:
1. Pond 100 is discharging to a private ditch, which should be coordinated with the Rice Creek
Watershed District and the City of Centerville.
Discharge location is being verified with developer.
Plunge Pool Energy Dissipator has been added to discharge location per discussion with watershed
district and City. See comment 9 regarding the plunge pool energy dissipator design.
2. Sections of the storm sewer are located directly beneath the overhead powerlines and should be
relocated.
Revised.
The storm sewer needs to be offset at least 20’ from the proposed structure on Lot 5 Block 4.
3. Adjust storm sewer that currently runs through Outlot C so that it follows the curb.
Revised. Note that in order to force storm sewer to follow the curb for its entirety in this lot, 2 additional
structures would be required. Catch basin moved further north to reduce the assumed future easement
in a potential front yard.
4. The storm sewer that is part of the rear yard drainage system for Lots 6 & 7 of Block 2 is too close to
the future houses. Applicant shall move the storm sewer to the west while maintaining a 20-ft offset
from the overhead power line.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 4
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Storm adjusted further back. Note that 20 feet from overhead power is not possible given the
maintenance access location and the need to revise a storm manhole to a catch basin manhole for
drainage purposes.
We are still concerned that the storm sewer is too close to the proposed structures for Lots 6 & 7 of
Block 2.
5. The north arrow is incorrect and wetlands on the figures should be labeled or noted in the legends
on Stormwater Management Plan Figures 2 and 3 and Storm Sewer Catchment Figure 4.
North arrow revised. Wetland line added to legend.
6. Show Proposed HydroCAD Pond “CB50” on Figure 3.
CB50 added.
7. Proposed HydroCAD Pond P300 stage storage invert (911.0) does not match bottom contour
shown on grading plan. (914)
HydroCAD model updated to match grading plan.
8. Ponds modeled in HydroCAD for backyard drainage swales and depressions (P300, P30A, P30B, and
CB50) should be modeled as a catch basin in HydroCAD (“pond with insignificant storage”). If they are
modeled as ponds, they will need to be evaluated to meet freeboard requirements for detention basins
(2’ of freeboard from the low entry in the 100-year storm event).
Revised to ponds with insignificant storage. Note that CB 122/123 was modeled as ponds to
determine by-pass flow (if any) to see if these would be directed towards a different pond/wetland or
offsite.
9. Plunge Pool Energy Dissipator grading requires revision. The bottom of the plunge pool grading of
891.5 has no width in the middle of it and grading is not feasible. Recommend at least 4-feet bottom
width to avoid erosion of slopes of pool. Confirm riprap size used at riprap check and overflow.
Recommend a detail or notes regarding width and depth of riprap check and overflow, and note on
how riprap size was determined.
10. Drainage Area S-10 is shown to flow to W-10. S-10 includes area east of Lots 12-20 of Block 4.
Confirm the drainage path for flow to pass from south to north under proposed Red Oak Lane.
11. Roadway profile and storm sewer – the road profile shall be a minimum of 1% grade. Adjust road
profile grade to move low points from intersections, Josephine and Red Oak. Storm sewer roadway
catch basins are spaced too far apart, 350 ft min. please extend storm sewer and add catch basins.
12. For the downstream ditches / outlets please provide a baseline data report
- Survey the bottom of the ditches.
- Provide a ditch cross section every 200’ or where it is observed to have a change in section.
- Shoot culverts and provide information on type, elevation and condition, document % full of water.
• Water Supply
There is existing 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain along 20th Av enue (CSAH 54) east
of the site and along Birch Street (CSAH 34) south of the site.
The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan does not designate any trunk watermain going through this
site. This has been revised with the latest water system plan.
The applicant is proposing an 8-inch diameter DIP watermain to serve the entire development. The
watermain will extend and loop from the east (North Pointe) along Red Oak Lane and from the south
(Birch Street).
Comments:
1. The watermain along Red Oak Lane shall be 12-inch diameter DIP. Trunk watermain credits will
apply.
Revised.
This is to be updated to a 16 inch DIP trunk watermain along Red Oak and Josephine. Trunk
water credits will apply.
2. A hydrant shall be installed by the lift station at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
Revised. Note that hydrant elevation may need to be revised when Heritage Avenue extends to the
north.
Please put a temporary hydrant at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
3. Applicant shall add a temporary hydrant at the dead end of Red Oak Lane.
Revised. Temporary hydrants added to site plans.
4. The City of Lino Lakes should consider installing water service stubs to serve the possible
future development at 6687 20th Avenue (26-31-22-14-002). It is anticipated that this parcel will develop into five lots that have access off of Red Oak Lane.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 5
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
Per planning comments, these services can be added with final plans.
Noted.
• Sanitary Sewer
There is an existing 10-inch diameter poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer stub at the intersection
of Red Oak Lane and 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). The invert of the stub is approximately 913.6 and is to
be verified.
The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan identifies a lift station to serve sanitary sewer districts 3D
and 3G.
The applicant is proposing to serve the development with 8-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer, 10- inch
diameter PVC sanitary sewer, a lift station located at the north edge of the development, and 4” PVC
forcemain. The lift station will pump the waste through the 4-inch diameter PVC forcemain to the existing
10-inch diameter PVC gravity sewer located on Red Oak Lane, just east of 20th Avenue
that was installed with the North Pointe development.
The Lift Station location is now proposed at Outlot F.
Comments:
1. Applicant shall extend the sanitary sewer on Red Oak Ln further to the east and provide a stub for
future connections.
Revised.
The City of Lino Lakes should consider installing sanitary service stubs to serve the possible
future development at 6687 20th Avenue (26-31-22-14-002). It is anticipated that this parcel will
develop into five lots that have access off of Red Oak Lane.
Per planning comments, these services can be added with final plans. Manhole moved further
east.
Noted.
2. Applicant shall submit a Lift Station Service Area Exhibit.
Lift station service area exhibit attached.
3. It is anticipated that the lift station in its current position will need to be 3 to 4-ft deeper. The
applicant shall review the necessary depth or consider moving the lift station to the area near the
western end of Red Oak Lane.
See attached service area exhibit. Lowered the line to provide separation from the culvert on
abandoned county ditch 47. Deepening the sanitary line creates a deep sanitary line within the
site and a secondary sanitary line has been added.
Please upsize the force main to a 6” diameter. Trunk credits will apply.
• Transportation
20th Avenue (CSAH 54) is classified as an A-minor Arterial Reliever and Birch Street (CSAH 34) is
classified as a Major Collector road.
Per the traffic study, Nadeau Acres will generate approximately 685 new trips per day with 50 new trips in
the a.m. peak hours (7-8 a.m.) and 65 trips in the p.m. peak hours (4:30-5:30 p.m.). None of the proposed
roadways are expected to exceed their daily capacities.
The study also reviewed the existing and proposed Levels of Service for the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and
Red Oak Lane intersection and the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and Birch Street (CSAH 34)
intersection. The proposed Levels of Service do not degrade by more than allowed by the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance.
Red Oak Lane, Heritage Avenue, and William Lane are proposed to be 32-ft wide from the back of curb to
the back of curb. The two cul-de-sacs, Josephine Court and Norma Way, are both proposed to be 28-ft
wide from back of curb to back of curb with cul-de-sac radii of 46-ft from the center to the back of curb.
The site will be accessed from 20th’Avenue (CSAH 54). The applicant is proposing widening 20th Avenue to
allow for a left turn lane (to Nadeau Acres), a through lane, and a right turn lane (to North Pointe) going
northbound and a right turn lane (to Nadeau Acres) and a left/through
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 6
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
lane going southbound.
Comments:
1. Anoka County is reviewing the traffic study and proposed turn lanes. It is anticipated that Anoka
County will require a designated southbound through lane along with a designated left turn lane
and right turn lane on 20th Avenue (CSAH 54).
Noted. This will be coordinated with the county.
Applicant shall show the proposed turn lane layout on both the site plan and the grading plan.
Anoka County will review the detailed turn lane plan for lane lengths and widths.
2. Update the cul-de-sac street widths to be 32-ft wide from back of curb to back of curb to meet city
requirements.
Revised.
3. Applicant shall realign the southern driveway entrance for 6709 20th Avenue that currently
provides access to 20th Avenue to Red Oak Lane.
Notes added to site plan.
Realign driveway more west ~ 100’ min from the intersection of Red Oak Lane and 20th
Avenue. The applicant is to coordinate with property owner.
4. Applicant shall show the proposed driveway for the existing house on Lot 10, Block 5.
Driveway added.
5. Red Oak Lane should have an eastbound through/left lane and a designated right turn lane at the
intersection of Red Oak Lane and 20th Avenue.
Lanes added.
Designated right turn lane shall be the same length as the right turn lane on Red Oak Lane east
of 20th Avenue.
6. Applicant shall identify the northern roadway limit of Heritage Avenue.
End of road added to plans. Grading adjusted accordingly.
7. City should consider the location of the pedestrian crossing at Heritage Avenue and William Lane.
Traffic maneuvering around the corner may not be expecting pedestrians crossing there. Options
to consider include extending the trail to move the crossing or moving the sidewalk to the south
side of William Lane and the east side of Heritage Avenue.
Advanced warning signs can be installed as well as a crosswalk paint markings and signage at the
crosswalk. Note that the turn from Heritage to William will require vehicles to slow down
significantly while taking the tight turn.
Sight lanes cannot be achieved for proper pedestrian safety. Applicant shall revise the sidewalk
location.
8. The Heritage Avenue/William Lane cul-de-sac exceeds the City’s maximum of 500-ft. This can
be allowed because the cul-de-sac is temporary.
Noted.
• Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. prepared a Wetland Delineation Report dated October 29,
2019. A Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 11, 2019. Per the report, two wetlands
were delineated on site totaling 1.43 acres. Wetland 1 is a Type 1 wet meadow wetland. Wetland 2 is a
partially-drained, wet meadow and scrub-shrub wetland. A portion of Wetland 2 southwest of the septic
mound discharge outlet was created in upland and is incidental. The project area is not located within the
Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP) and outside of Wetland
Management Corridor (WMC).
The applicant is proposing 0.7 acres of disturbance and will be purchasing wetland banking credits.
• Landscaping
Open area landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 sf. Buffer and
screen standards apply along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). Approximately 475 linear feet of frontage will
be screened by shrubs, new trees, and existing trees to provide a continuous planting screen year-
round. The Preliminary Landscape Plan shows trees and shrubs planted on two separate berms.
Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family.
Comments:
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 7
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
1. Boulevard trees should be shown within the city right-of-way.
Updated
2. Move plantings off of proposed storm sewer and riprap areas.
Noted.
3. Coniferous trees shall be 10-ft from trail edges. Deciduous trees shall be 15-ft from trail edges.
Noted.
Trees near trail extension to Birch Street do not meet the requirements listed above.
• Floodplain
There are no existing floodplains on Nadeau Acres.
• Drainage and Utility Easements
Drainage and utility easements are proposed within the site where there is proposed storm sewer,
backyard swales, and stormwater management facilities. There is an existing 66-ft wide powerline
easement that runs from northeast to southwest through the middle of the site, and an existing 85-ft
wide powerline easement that runs along the western edge of the site.
The applicant is dedicating a 60-ft right-of-way along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and an 80-ft right-of-way
along Birch Street (CSAH 34).
Comments:
1. Storm sewer between lots 108 and 109 is greater than 10-ft deep, therefore, the easement shall be
twice as wide as the depth.
Easement revised to 30-feet. Storm sewer is approximately 14.5 feet deep.
2. 10’ Turf Maintenance Access to be installed over all storm sewer utility proposed between lots.
Include between lots 155 and 154, 150 and 149, 121 and 122, and 109 and 108,
Added.
Lot numbers changed, Turf Maintenance Access added.
3. Drainage and Utility Easements shall not be within powerline easements unless there is
documentation from the powerline company to use this space as an easement.
Easements revised.
Prior to final plat approval, the applicant needs to submit documentation that the power
company will grant drainage and utility easements.
4. Temporary grading easements on adjacent properties may be required (see Grading section for more
details).
Retaining walls removed from right-of -way and stub streets/temporary dead-ends pulled back to
allow for grading on-site.
5. Provide documentation of grading and utility agreement within the NSP powerline easements (85-ft
wide easement and 66-ft wide easement).
In Process. – Permit Application submitted 02-24-2020
6. Grading for the outlet for Pond 100 is on adjacent private property (26-31-22-12-0006) and will
require a drainage and utility easement approval from the property owner and NSP.
Noted. will be coordinated with property owner. Plans will be adjusted accordingly if easement
cannot be obtained.
Plans have been adjusted.
7. Sheet 6 showing the ghost plat is missing from the plan set dated 3/20/2020.
• Development Agreement
A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat.
Noted.
• Grading Agreement
A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City’s Programmatic
Stormwater Management Agreement.
Ms. Katie Larsen
4/13/2020
Page 8
Nadeau Acres Engineering Review
• Permits Required
1. NPDES General Construction Permit
2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction
3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
4. Minnesota Department of Health
5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit- Note CAPROC 4/8/2020
6. Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit
7. Provide documentation of Northern States Power agreement or document of understanding of the work
(permanent and temporary) to be done within the NSP easements on the site.
If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-
4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com.
Page 1
Memo
To: Katie Larsen
From: Andy Nelson
Date: April 23, 2020
Re: Environmental Coordinator comments for Nadeau Acres RZ PP V4
(3-23-20)
Carlson McCain Comments
Staff Comments
The following recommendations were made by the Lino Lakes Environmental
Board on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 concerning Nadeau Acres:
1. Open Space Landscape standard trees must be calculated per
outlot/segment of open space, and not calculated as a total for the
entire development. In other words, existing trees in Outlot A will
not satisfy tree requirements for Outlot B, etc. Open space trees
are still required for Outlots B, E, and F.
Updated OK
2. Outlot C is a future right-of-way and will not require trees and
shrubs, but area must be seeded.
Noted OK
3. Outlot D will not require trees and shrubs because lots in this
area are going to be expanded to eliminate this outlot.
Noted OK
4. Staff will work with developer to increase within-block diversity of
boulevard trees. Ultimately, City staff will select species and
placement for boulevard trees. This will involve revisions to
placement that ensure trees are in the right-of-way and provide
Environmental
Page 2
Clear Vision Area for Local Residential Roads (Item #5 of the
Landscaping Guidelines and Technical Requirements), which
addresses visibility at intersections.
Noted
Species selected are all appropriate. City staff will work on exact
placement in the field.
5. Buffer and screen standards call for a 6 foot high continuous screen on
Block 5, Lots 7-10. Lots 7-9 should have a continuous 6 foot high berm
with the trees and shrubs planted on top, rather than the two separate
berms now called for on the plans. The existing trees on Block 5, Lot 10
should be left in place as proposed on the plan.
Noted
OK, Buffer can remain as two separate berms as shown on the plans
dated 3/23/20.
6. Tree protection zones should be 1 foot radius away from the trunk per inch
DBH (diameter at breast height), as described in the Details Plate, and
Landscape Specifications on Preliminary Landscape Plan should be
changed to match Details Plate. All Tree Protection Zones should be in
place before any other construction activity begins on the site.
Updated OK
7. Staff recommends 35-241 Mesic Prairie General to use on the portion of
Outlots A, B, and E that are above the 100 year High Water Level.
Updated OK
8. Replace Royal Purple Smoke Tree with Chokeberry in open area plantings for
more value to wildlife.
Updated OK
9. Species and placement changes for trees in outlots B and D.
Move 5 Black Hills spruce from outlot B and place them in a line at the pavement
edge of Heritage Avenue’s northern boundary (the stub).
Replace remaining 6 Black Hills spruce and 2 Canadian hemlocks in outlot B with
Swamp white, bur, or pin oaks.
Replace 6 Canadian hemlocks in outlot D with oaks.
10. Replace Seed mix 35-241 Mesic Prairie General with 35-641 Mesic Prairie
Southeast.
11. There are now 68 lots with 77 boulevard trees required, which accounts for one per
frontage. Please update this in the City of Lino Lakes Landscape Requirements on the
Preliminary Landscape Plan.
>>|||||||||||||||||||||||||ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe oh
e
o
h
e
ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
e
o
h
eugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugugueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueueutvutvutvxxxxxx>>
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxoheohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
>>>>>>>>>>
ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe oheueueueugugutut ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe ohe
x
>>>>>>>>>>>||||||||||||>>>>xxxxxx
oheoheoheoh
e
oh
e
oh
eoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheohe
oheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheoheohe ohe ohe
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||ohe
ohe
ohe
ohe
>>>>>>>>>>oheoheoheoheohe>>>>|oh
e
ohe ohe ohe ohe
>>>>
>>ueue ue ue ue uexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesota VICINITY MAP ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_cover.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaCOVER12. 2/7/20 Revise Sheets 9,10,&123. 2/21/20 Revise Per City Comments4. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:EXCEPTION
ZONING: RZONING: RZONING: RZONING: PUD ZONING: R
ZONING: PUD ZONING: RCITY OF CENTERVILLEZONING: Rf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_excon.dwgSave Date:01/13/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···EXISTING CONDITIONSThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2067KCM12/06/19132LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025
HERITAGE AVENUE HERITAGEAVENUEHERITAGE AVENUEWILLIAMLANENORMA WAYJOSEPHINECOURTRED OAKRED OAKRED OAK LANE(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)20TH AVENUE S.LANELANEOWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:EXCEPTIONSEE SHEET 5ZONING: RZONING: RZONING: RZONING: PUD
ZONING: R
ZONING: PUD ZONING: RCITY OF CENTERVILLEZONING: RSEE SHEET 4f:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp index.dwgSave Date:03/23/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEXThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision2067KCM12/06/19133LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 - 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025 SITE DATA NADEAU ACRES
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:
OWNER:EXCEPTION
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUENORMA WAYJOSEPHINECOURTRED OAKRED OAK LANE20TH AVENUE SOUTH LANEREDOAKLANEf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp.dwgSave Date:03/21/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/06/1940361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:2067KCM12/06/19134LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision
OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OW
N
E
R
:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:HERITAGE AVENUEHERITAGEAVENUEWILLIAMLANENORMA WAY(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)f:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8440_prp.dwgSave Date:03/21/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:40361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:135LEGENDBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 5502512/06/19KCM12/06/192067Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Per Pond 100 Outlet Revision
HERITAGE AVENUE
HERITAGE AVENUEWILLIAMCOURTNORMA WAYRED OAKLANEJOSEPHINERED OAKRED OAK LANE(C.S.A.H. NO. 54)20TH AVENUE SOUTH LANELANEEXCEPTIONHERITAGE
AVENUEf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\ghost plat.dwgSave Date:03/20/20of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comNADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···GHOST PLATI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1.Revised layout. 01/10/20202.Revised layout. 02/11/20203.Revised layout. 02/21/2020XXXC#12/06/19136BL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025GHOSTPLATGHOSTPLATGHOSTPLAT
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_site.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaSITE PLAN LEGENDPRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN7PRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN1. 1/10/20 Per City Comments2. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING INDEX82. 2/21/20 Per City Comments3. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN92. 2/7/20 Revise Pond HWL's3. 2/21/20 Per City Comments4. 3/20/20 Rev per new Pond 100 outlet.
ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_gr.dwgSave Date:03/21/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN102. 2/7/20 Revise Pond HWL's3. 2/21/20 Per City Comments
TREE PRESERVATION PLANINDEXofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT14 VICINITY MAP
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT242. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT34
TREE PRESERVATION PLANofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\trees\8440_tree.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaT443. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPHASING PLANP1ofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\8421 - 8440\8440 - nadeau parcel\cad c3d\engineering\prelim-plans\8440_phasing_plan.dwgSave Date:03/23/20environmentalengineeringsurveying···13Revisions:1. 1/10/20 Per City CommentsPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota12/6/19JJO12/6/19Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJKBL HOLDINGS, LLC7517 162nd Avenue NEColumbus, MN 55025NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, MinnesotaPHASE IPHASE IIPHASE IPHASE II1NADEAU ACRESLino Lakes, Minnesota VICINITY MAP 2. 3/20/20 Per P100 Outlet Revision
1
1st Reading: Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 02-20
ORDINANCE TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R, RURAL
TO R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR
NADEAU ACRES
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
Section 1: Findings of Fact
1. The City received a Land Use Application to rezone certain property from R,
Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
2. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 12, 2020.
3. Per Section 1007.015 (5), the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible
adverse effects of the proposed rezoning and its judgement shall be based upon,
but not limited to, the following factors:
(a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies
and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance.
Per the zoning ordinance, land that is guided low density residential can be zoned R-1,
Single Family Residential, R-1X, Single Family Executive Residential or R-2, Two Family
Residential.
The proposed Nadeau Acres residential subdivision is consistent with the goals and
policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use,
housing, transportation and utilities. The development is consistent with low density
residential land use and compliant with density requirements. Safe transportation
corridors and public utilities also serve the development.
(b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of
the area.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development is compatible with the present and future land
uses of the area. Present land uses in the area are residential. Future land uses in the
area are guided low and medium density residential.
2
(c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development conforms with the zoning ordinance
performance standards for R-1, Single Family Residential District.
(d) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will
not overburden the City’s service capacity.
The proposed Nadeau Acres development can be accommodated with existing public
services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The site is served by 8”
watermain and 8”-10”sanitary sewer, forcemain and lift station. The public water and
sanitary system is adequately sized for the development in the district.
Section 2: Amendment
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes is hereby amended to rezone the
following described property from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family Residential.
Section 3: Legal Description
That part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast
corner of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North along the East line of said
East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 941.14 feet to the North line of the
South 941.00 feet thereof, also being the point of beginning; thence westerly, along said
North line of the South 941.00 feet thereof, a distance of 865.13 feet to the West line of
the East 865.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence southerly, along
said westerly line, a distance of 196.03 feet to the North line of the South 745.00 feet of
said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence westerly, along said North line, a distance
of 135.02 feet to the West line of the East 1000.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter; thence southerly, along said West line, a distance of 495.07 feet to the North line
of EAST BIRCH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota; thence easterly, along said North line of EAST BIRCH ADDITION, a
distance of 611.39 feet to the Northwest corner of Outlot A, said EAST BIRCH
ADDITION; thence southerly, along the West line of said Outlot A, a distance of 190.00
feet to the southerly line of said Outlot A; thence easterly, along said southerly line said
Outlot A, a distance of 60.00 feet to the East line of said Outlot A; thence northerly,
along said East line of said Outlot A, a distance of 148.74 feet to the North line of the
South 208.71 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly, along said
North line, a distance of 120.02 feet to the West line of the East 208.71 feet of said East
Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said West line, a distance of
417.46 feet to the North line of the South 626.11 feet of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter; thence easterly, along said North line, a distance of 208.74 feet to said East line
of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said East line, a
distance of 314.94 to said point of beginning.
3
AND
That part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast
corner of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly, along the East line of
said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1100.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence
westerly along a line parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast
Quarter, a distance of 610.00 feet; thence northerly, along a line parallel with the East
line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence westerly
along a line parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a
distance of 48.00 feet; thence northerly, along a line parallel with the East line of said
East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 345.00 feet; thence westerly, along a line
parallel with the South line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 659.7
feet, more or less, to the West line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence
southerly, along said westerly line, a distance of 919.95 feet, more or less, to the North
line of the South 745.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly,
along said northerly line, a distance of 449.55 feet, to the West line of the East 865.00
feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said West line a
distance of 196.03 feet, to the North line of the South 941.00 feet of said East Half of the
Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along said North line, a distance of 865.13 feet, to the
East line of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said East
line, a distance of 158.86 feet to said point of beginning.
AND
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of and 1320.00 feet North of the Southeast corner of
said Northeast Quarter; thence North along said East line, 345.00 feet; thence West on a
line parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter 658.00 feet; thence South,
parallel with said East line of the Northeast Quarter, 345.00 feet; thence East, parallel
with said South line of the Northeast Quarter, 658.00 feet to the point of beginning,
EXCEPT that part described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees
23 minutes 08 seconds West, assumed bearing along the East line of said Northeast
Quarter, 1380.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 00 degrees 23
minutes 08 seconds West, along said East line, 285.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 24
minutes 11 seconds West, parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter, 262.00
feet; thence South 00 degrees 23 minutes 08 seconds East, 170.00 feet; thence South 31
degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds East, 135.12 feet to the North line of the South 1380.00
feet as measured along said East line of the Northeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees
24 minutes 11 seconds East, along said North line 193.00 feet to said point of beginning.
Section 4: Development Regulations
4
The development shall conform to the plans, requirements, and conditions of approval as
listed in Council Resolution No. 20-20.
Section 5: Effect
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter and upon the filing of the final plat.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-20
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND OPENING SUB-DISTRICT 3C & 3D OF
UTILITY STAGING AREA 2A (2020-2025) FOR NADEAU ACRES
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for preliminary plat for Nadeau Acres
hereafter referred to as Development; and
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the Development based on the following:
• Nadeau Acres Civil Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain revision date March 20, 2020
• Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 6,
2019
• Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated
December 6, 2019
• Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Inc. dated December 23, 2019
• Rare Plant Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated December 12, 2019
• Traffic Impact Study by Spack Consulting dated December 6, 2019; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February 12,
2020 and the Board recommended approval of the Development with a 2-1; and
WHEREAS, 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy requires the City Council
to determine by resolution if the next 10 year utility staging is to be opened to development; and
WHEREAS, the Development is located in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-District 3C and 3D)
of 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-2025).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Preliminary Plat
Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
(1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the
following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
2
1. Land use plan;
2. Transportation plan;
3. Utility (sewer and water) plans;
4. Local water management plan;
5. Capital improvement plan; and
6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
The proposed Nadeau Acres residential subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of
the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation,
utilities, local water management, capital improvements and growth management. The
development is consistent with low density residential land use and compliant with density
requirements. Safe transportation corridors and public utilities also serve the development.
(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill
policies.
Nadeau Acres is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the 2030 Utility
Staging Area 2A (2020-2025).The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is
consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future
utility costs are proposed.
(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the
requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual.
A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Spack Solutions on December 6, 2019 and concluded
the additional 68 single family lots will not negatively impact the transportation system. Level of
Service (LOS) requirement is met.
(d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water
supply.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the water supply plan. The site is served by an 8” watermain
extending from the east and loops south to Birch Street. The water system has capacity to serve
this residential development.
(e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste
disposal systems.
Nadeau Acres meets the goals of the sanitary sewer plan. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer
District 3 (Sub-district 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging area 2A (2020-2025). The
sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development.
Utility Staging Area
Per the page 3-26 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s Growth Management Policy:
6. Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next ten-year staging area, or five-year phase
within a ten-year staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will
determine by resolution if the next area is to be opened to development. The following
3
criteria will be used to determine where and when to open up the next ten-year staging
area, or five-year phase within a staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on
the staging plan:
a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate
analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility
extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new
development. If infrastructure is not available and cannot be made available in a
timely manner to support expanding into the next ten-year staging area or five year
phase within a staging area, the city may refrain from opening up the next staging
area, or portions thereof.
Adequate infrastructure is available to support Nadeau Acres. The development is located in
Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-District 3C and 3D) and is in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A
(2020-2025). The sanitary sewer system has capacity to serve the development.
Nadeau Acres also meets the goals of the 2030 Transportation Plan by providing a safe road
connection between future neighborhoods, constructing turn lanes along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue)
and controlling access management along County roads.
b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one
area of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the
city. Decisions to open new areas to development should clearly define and map the
area being opened.
Only Sub-District 3C and 3D of Sanitary Sewer District 3 in 2030 Utility Staging Area 2A (2020-
2025) is being opened to development.
c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in
accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
establishes the following conditions of approval:
1. Outlots A, B, C, D and E shall be deeded to the City.
2. Outlot C shall be deeded to the City and dedicated for road right-of-way and drainage and
utility purposes.
3. A temporary cul de sac easement shall be recorded over the west end of William Lane.
4. The temporary cul de sac shall be removed, ground restored and the temporary easement
released upon extension of William Lane.
5. The private septic systems at 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue shall be removed.
6. The private well at 6677 20th Avenue shall be capped.
7. The existing house at 6651 20th Avenue shall hook up to municipal sanitary sewer.
8. The existing south driveway of 6709 20th Avenue shall be relocated west onto Red Oak
Lane.
9. The existing driveway accesses from 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue shall be
removed.
10. A building permit is required for the house relocation at 6677 20th Avenue.
4
11. The property owners of PID #26-31-22-12-0006 and #26-31-22-13-0001 (Vickers) have
expressed concerns about Josephine Lane stubbing to their property line. It should be
noted that if it is decided to pull back the sanitary sewer, watermain and street
improvements along Josephine Lane, there will be an added cost to the development of
their property in the future. It should also be noted that Josephine Lane will be extended
in the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the preliminary plat and utility staging area for Nadeau Acres subject to the following
items being addressed:
1. Comments from WSB City Engineer memo dated April 27, 2020 shall be addressed.
2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated April 23, 2020 shall be
addressed.
3. It is the preferred option of the City to extend a stormwater pipe west from Pond 100 to
the ditch on the Vickers property (PID# 26-31-22-12-0006). Staff is directed to work
with the developer to provide a design for such extension, obtain easement, and
coordinate with the property owner.
4. The applicant shall prepare the deeds for Outlots A, B, C, D and E for City review and
approval prior to recording.
a. Outlot C shall be dedicated for road right-of-way and drainage and utility
purposes.
5. The applicant shall prepare the temporary cul de sac easements for City review and
approval prior to recording.
6. Proof that the private septic systems at 6677 20th Avenue and 6651 20th Avenue have
been properly removed shall be submitted to the City upon completion.
7. Proof that the private well located at 6677 20th Avenue has been properly capped shall be
submitted to the City upon completion.
8. The applicant shall provide approval from NSP aka Xcel Energy allowing for public and
private improvement within their easement e.g. stormwater pond, landscaping, streets,
utilities etc.
9. “Future Road Extension” signs are required at the west end of William Lane and Red
Oak Lane and at the north end of Heritage Avenue.
a. These may be shown on the final plans.
10. Sheets 3-5, Preliminary Plat:
a. On Sheet 3, the density calculations shall be revised to subtract the “Proposed
Wetlands = 0.65 acres”. The Net Density then becomes 2.27 lots/acre.
b. A minimum10 foot wide drainage and utility easement upland from the delineated
wetland boundary is required.
i. The easement on Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 shall be revised.
ii. The lot area summary Excel spreadsheet shall be revised.
c. Josephine Court shall be revised to Josephine Lane.
11. Sheet 7, Preliminary Site & Utility Plan:
a. Southbound left, right and through lanes from CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) onto Red
Oak Lane shall be approved by Anoka County.
b. Proper turn lanes from Red Oak Lane onto CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) are required.
c. Utilities and services shall be provided for the future development of 6687 20th
Avenue on the final plans.
12. Sheet 9, Preliminary Grading Plan & Erosion Control Plan:
5
a. Revise comment “Ex. House to be Moved to Lot 136” to Lot 135.
13. Sheet L1 & L2, Preliminary Landscape Plan:
a. A row of coniferous trees shall be planted at the north end of Heritage Avenue to
provide a screen from vehicle headlights shining into the adjacent house located at
6747 20th Avenue.
14. Phasing Plan:
a. Phase I shall be revised to 35 lots.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2020
TOPIC: Lyngblomsten Senior Living Community
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-44 Approving PUD
Development Stage Plan Amendment #1-Site Plan and
Grading & Drainage Plan
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Lyngblomsten, has submitted a land use application for PUD Development
Stage Plan Amendment #1 to omit the clubhouse and revise the site plan and grading &
drainage plans.
The original PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat was approved by City Council on
April 8, 2019 by Resolution No. 19-42. The original plans included a centrally located stand-
alone clubhouse. The clubhouse is now being omitted in order to enlarge the stormwater pond.
This staff report is based on the following submittal documents:
• PUD Amendment Narrative prepared by Lyngblomstem dated March 9, 2020
• Revised Site Plan and Grading Plan prepared by AJA Associates, Inc. dated December 31,
2019
• Stormwater Management Report prepared by AJA Associates, Inc. revised February 28,
2020
ANALYSIS
The April 8, 2019 Council Staff Report, Ordinance No. 07-19 and Resolution No. 19-42 detail
the project’s compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road
& CR J and Subdivision Ordinance. Ordinance No. 07-19 rezoned the property to PUD,
Planned Unit Development in order to implement the goals of the Master Planning Study. The
Ordinance details permitted, accessory and conditional uses allowed within the development.
Resolution No. 19-42 approved the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat that
includes the preliminary plat, site plan, grading & drainage plans, utility plans, landscaping
plans, architectural building elevations etc. The resolution also establishes the development’s
framework in regards to lot and yard requirement, height regulations, impervious surface
coverage and design guidelines.
2
The amendment is to the site plan and grading & drainage plan of the PUD Development Stage
Plan. If approved, all plans sheets of the PUD Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat
will be revised to reflect the amendment and other comments listed in Resolution No. 19-42.
The applicant will then submit PUD Final Plan/Final Plat for Council approval.
Original Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan Overview
Site Plan
Resolution No. 19-42 approving the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat included
an overall general site plan and grading & drainage plan of the 20 acre development.
Per the original site plan, Lyngblomsten is proposing a 3 phased approach to redevelopment of
6 parcels totaling 20 acres located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH49 (Hodgson Road) and
CR J (Ash Street).
• Phase 1 is the senior living community consisting of the following housing options:
• Cottage Homes = 20 units
• Senior Living Campus
o Independent Living = 100 units
o Assisted-living = 50 units
o Skilled Nursing Facility = 48 units
o TOTAL UNITS = 218 total units
The market rate cottage homes are 1,400 sf single level cottages with 2 bedrooms and an
attached 21’ x 21’ garage.
The senior living community independent and assisted-living units are market-rate and mid-
range in price with a variety of 1- and 2-bedroom units and heated underground parking. The
community also includes complementary campus amenities such as a Life Enrichment Center
(2nd Half Lyngblomsten), main floor town center with bistro style or fine dining, a pub, cinema,
chapel, fitness center and gift shop. The development also includes a 4,600 sf club house with
game room, kitchen and lounge.
• Phase 2 is a stand-alone 6,000 sf restaurant with outdoor patio
• Phase 3 is future commercial development
The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The
future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 parcels (3 acres)
which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently
demolished 49 Club.
Grading & Drainage Plan
Per the original Storm Water Management Report prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates
dated March 11, 2019, rate control is being accomplished using a combination of a dry pond
3
and a storm water treatment pond. The proposed rate is less than 80% of the existing rate of
runoff.
Water quality treatment is accomplished at the single stormwater treatment pond. True
infiltration was considered during the design phase, but several factors contributed to not
pursuing infiltration practices. First, shallow groundwater exists on site. Secondly, the site has
been maximized and there is not adequate space for effective infiltration practices.
Instead, a stormwater pond was to be constructed. The stormwater pond, in addition to
providing rate control, has been sized to provide adequate dead storage to meet water quality
requirements. Finally, an irrigation pumping station will be constructed at the stormwater pond
to draw water from the pond to irrigate the surrounding areas.
The clubhouse was strategically located adjacent to the landscaped stormwater pond as a site
amenity.
Proposed PUD Amendment #1 to Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan
The amendment proposes to omit the stand-alone clubhouse and associated parking lot and
expand the size of the stormwater pond. Per the applicant’s March 9, 2020 PUD Amendment
Narrative:
“The following changes have been made to the original PUD Application:
• Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) sent comments to the design team on 4/12/2019,
regarding the proposed pond. The normal water level (NWL) of the pond was questioned
by both RCWD and the city of Lino Lakes due to high groundwater table. Lyngblomsten
hired Braun Intertec in April of 2019 to monitor the site’s groundwater. We discussed these
findings with the city, and as the result, had to propose addition site storage to satisfy
RCWD’s comments. There are two options to accommodate the additional stormwater
storage:
o A second pond would be required. However, the location of the second pond would
have to be in the commercial parcel, limiting the developable land and restricting
how much development could occur on the commercial parcel. The city has long
seen this intersection as the gateway to Lino Lakes and the neighborhood oriented
commercial amenities have been consistently identified by the neighborhood and
city leadership as one of the major benefits of this project.
o Therefore, in lieu of the second pond, we are proposing adding the capacity to the
current central pond to accommodate additional impervious surface, including the
3+ acre corner lot, purchased after the original PUD application. In doing so, the
pond’s size increased significantly and would need to consume the area previously
allotted for the Clubhouse and its associated parking lot.
• The development and design team have successfully included all of the amenities from the
Clubhouse into the Town Center of the main senior living building.
o In the proposal presented to the neighborhood group in August of 2018, the amenity
and administrative spaces within the Clubhouse was approximately 4,450 square
feet. The Town Center at the time was approximately 10,200 square feet.
4
o In the final construction documents, our Town Center is 18,185 square feet. This
additional 8,000 square feet of common and amenity space more than makes up in
both size and function for the loss of the Clubhouse space. The Town Center is
designed to welcome the neighborhood beyond our immediate live-in residents.
Some of the additional amenities include:
A vendor space for outside vendors like service dog or banking
organizations
Additional space to accommodate a community based Adult Day program
Larger multi-purpose room, available for larger events like concerts and
community meeting space
Larger lap pool for water exercise classes
A larger Wellness Center
A larger Salon with capacity for nail care
Designated spaces for a 50-seat formal dining, 25-seat informal dining
(café), 57-seat indoor/outdoor pub, and a 16-seat party room.”
Pond Size Comparison
Original Pond 3P Enlarged Pond 3P
Surface Area 0.56 acres 0.82 acres
Volume 2.810 acre feet 3.869 acre feet
RCWD issued an amended Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) on
March 13, 2020. The District Engineer finds the revised grading and stormwater management
plans compliant with RCWD rules.
In general, the rest of the overall site plan and building layout remains the same. The number of
housing units is still 218. Some notable changes include:
• The northeast cul de sac in the private road in the cottage home neighborhood was
flipped to the south allowing the cottage homes pads to be slightly adjusted but the
number remains 20 units.
• The northwest parking stalls have been moved to the end of the cul de sac.
• The applicant purchased 275 Ash Street and the main public road will now align with
St. Albans Street to the south as supported by Resolution No. 19-42.
• Joint parking facilities and shared driveways were incorporated into the commercial
area as required.
A final detailed site plan review will be completed upon submission of the PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat. The intent of PUD Amendment is to obtain Council approval of omitting the
clubhouse and enlarging the stormwater pond before the applicant moves forward on final
plans.
Findings of Fact
5
The Findings of Fact for the PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1 are detailed in
Resolution No. 20-44.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 8, 2020. Public comments were
more related to the buffers and landscaping screening than the clubhouse omission and
stormwater pond size. The buffers and screening are being addressed with the PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat. The Planning & Zoning Board voted 5-0 in favor of the PUD Development
Stage Plan Amendment #1.
Staff is requesting Council consideration of the following:
1. Resolution No. 20-44
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 20-44
2. Original 3D Rendering
3. Revised 3D Rendering
4. Original Site Plan dated March 11, 2019
5. Original Grading & Drainage Plan dated March 11, 2019
6. Revised Site Plan dated December 31, 2019
7. Revised Grading & Drainage Plan dated December 31, 2019
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-44
APPROVING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN AMENDMENT #1-SITE PLAN
AND GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN FOR LYNGBLOMSTEN
WHEREAS, the City received an application for PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1
for Lyngblomsten hereafter referred to as Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat on
April 8, 2019 by Resolution No. 19-42 that included a stand-alone clubhouse and associated
parking lot; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment proposes to omit the stand-alone clubhouse and associated parking
lot and enlarge the stormwater pond in order to meet RCWD and City stormwater management
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Amendment consists of the following plan sets and documents:
• PUD Amendment Narrative prepared by Lyngblomstem dated March 9, 2020
• Revised Site Plan and Grading Plan prepared by AJA Associates, Inc. dated December
31, 2019
• Stormwater Management Report prepared by AJA Associates, Inc. revised February 28,
2020; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on April 8, 2020
and the Board recommended approval of the Amendment with a 5-0 vote; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1:
Per Section 1007.024(1) Purpose and Intent, the PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict
provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc.,
by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to
encourage:
1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the
Master Plan.
2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures
through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
2
The Amendment continues to implement the Master Plan’s vision to create an urban form for the
area. Buildings are pulled towards the main collector roads and away from existing residential
homes.
3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing
vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.
The existing wetland on site will not be impacted by the Amendment. A wetland buffer and
conservation easement will provide additional protection of the natural resource.
4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and
orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other.
The Amendment continues to transition development from existing low density single family
homes to cottage home to a senior living campus consisting of independent living, assisted living
and skilled nursing facilities to restaurant and commercial use. Building heights are tiered from
single level cottage homes to two, three and then four story senior living campus as the
development progresses towards CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street).
5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments.
The Amendment does not change the road right-of-way widths. The public road right-of-way
width is the standard 60 foot wide with a 32 foot wide paved road surface. The cottage home
private road is 26 feet wide and the commercial private road is 26 feet wide. Both private roads
will be owned and maintained by a private entity.
6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through
the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations.
The Amendment continues to implement the Master Plan’s vision to create an urban form for the
area. Buildings are pulled towards the main collector roads and away from existing residential
homes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the requirements of Ordinance No. 07-19 and Resolution No.
19-42 are still in effect; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage
Plans for Lyngblomsten subject to the following conditions:
1. If approved, the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Design Guidelines
shall be revised and submitted to staff for review that addresses all items listed in
Resolution No. 19-42 and subsequent resolution.
a. The revised plans shall show the entire full build development (cottage homes,
senior complex and commercial area).
b. The “Dashed Area = Future” can be shown on the PUD Final Plans for each phase
of development.
3
2. A PUD Final Plan/Final Plat land use application and submittal is required for Planning
and Zoning Board review and Council approval.
3. All plan sheets shall include a trail along the north side of CR J (Ash Street).
4. Dumpsters, trash compactor and generators for the senior building shall be located
underground in the garage area.
5. The trail easement shall be outside of the cottage home Lot #16.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
0$7&+/,1(0$7&+/,1($&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 '''%%%%%%%%%%%%
;
67$//6 7<3 3$,17675,3(#
2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 123$5.,1*
123$5.,1*
123$5.,1*
123$5.,1*3$,17675,3(#
2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3
;
67$//6 7<3
;
67$//6 7<3 12.0
0':+,7(3$,17675,3(
;
67$//6 7<3 123$5.,1*123$5.,1*3$,17675,3(#
2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 3$5.,1* 7<3,&$/ 19.01'
(TYP)
16.00'
(TYP)
;
67$//6 7<3 &21&5(7((175$1&(&21&5(7((175$1&(
;
67$//6 7<3 %&/8%+286(5(67$85$175()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,2165()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,216727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ 0$,13$5.,1* &/8%+286(3$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 1257+:(673$5.,1*5(67$85$173$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ 3$,17('',5(&7,21$/$552: 7<3,&$/ &21&5(7((175$1&(67236,*167236,*1123$5.,1*%0$,1%8,/',1* /27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27 /27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27/27 /271257+($673$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' &21&5(7((175$1&( 352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(17+($9<'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(170(',80'87<3$9(0(1738.01'
;
67$//6 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6,*1 7<3 $&&(66,%/(6<0%2/ 7<3 3$,17675,3(#
2&:,7+:25'6123$5.,1* 7<3 123$5.,1*
123$5.,1*6287+3$5.,1*727$/67$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 5(7$,1,1*:$//5()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)25/$<287$1'',0(16,2165(7$,1,1*:$//:(7/$1'(;,67,1*<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(5(7$,1,1*:$//5(7$,1,1*:$//5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'5$,6('0(',$1,6/$1'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:North6,7(3/$129(5$//'$9,'$5(<;;;;;;;;;;;%-''$5
&&,7<68%0,77$/5(9,6,21'$7( 0,11(627$352)(66,21$/(1*,1((5/<1*%/2067(11415 ALMOND AVE WST. PAUL, MN 55108HODGSON ROADLINO LAKES, MN 55014/<1*%/2067(16(1,25&20081,7,(66,*1$*(.(<127(60Q087&'5 [ $0Q087&'5 [ %6,0,/$5720Q087&'5 [ 3$5.,1*&127(6 5()(5726+((7&6,7(3/$11257+)25127(6 5()(5726+((7&*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$11257+)25*(1(5$/127(6/(*(1'5()(5(1&(.(<726,7('(7$,/6'(7$,/,'180%(5 723 '(7$,/6+((7180%(5 %27720 352326('&21&5(7(:$/.352326('&21&5(7(6/$%352326('/,*+7'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('0(',80'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('+($9<'87<%,780,12863$9(0(17352326('123$5.,1*675,3,1*352326('75$)),&&21752/6,*16,*1$*(.(<127(352326('%2//$5'3$,17('$&&(66,%/(6<0%2/352326('0$1+2/( 0+ 352326('&$7&+%$6,1 &% 352326(')/$5('(1'6(&7,21 )(6 352326('+<'5$17 +<' 352326('*$7(9$/9( *9 352326('3267,1',&$7259$/9( 3,9 352326(')/$*32/(5()(572$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16352326('%8,/',1*672235()(572$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16352326('/,*+732/(5()(572(/(&75,&$/3/$163523(57</,1($1C2.111257+($673$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 1257+:(673$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' &/8%+286(3$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 5(67$85$173$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 6287+3$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 0$,13$5.,1*727$/67$//6 $&&(66,%/(67$//65(48,5(' $&&(66,%/(67$//63529,'(' 6,7(67$7,67,&6 030 60
10.598.598.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.510.505.504.202.604.906.406.406.406.806.801.3 ME03.407.205.704.204.098.503.903.905.005.408.708.801.905.798.398.5886895895896896896 899899900900900 900901
901901902902902
902 902902 902902902902902
903903903
903
903 903903 90390390390490490490406.806.306.7 EOF05.206.0 EOF05.105.6 EOF04.906.0 EOF05.405.104.806.806.506.505.905.906.2 EOF07.206.007.505.690490490490490405.903.806.298.303.998.398.598.598.307.007.007.007.106.905.605.504.903.506.507.101.5 EOF03.290490490406.604.705.8905905905905905 905905905 90590590505.907.006.3 EOF05.304.705.306.407.006.706.105.806.306.0 EOF905905905906906906906906906 906906906906906906 906906906906906906906
06.205.404.808.008.008.005.5 EOF04.505.805.104.704.805.305.806.706.406.405.506.006.206.105.507.207.407.108.207.207.307.007.507.206.506.906.707.190690690690690607.105.306.305.605.905.606.206.506.206.007.006.706.405.706.507.806.4906906906906906906907907
907907907907 907907907907907907
907907 907907907907
04.309.109.409.108.508.007.109.008.709.209.509.009.310.210.209.509.508.507.708.608.508.505.605.905.607.206.906.906.306.906.909.410.209.609.609.603.705.604.404.704.402.404.6907907907907907907 05.506.305.805.506.706.790790790790790790707.205.405.605.406.390708.008.010.710.490890890890890890890806.705.803.503.603.403.403.303.908.708.608.508.408.608.908.608.608.308.307.807.507.407.404.506.405.305.605.506.906.406.706.406.307.707.708.005.305.398.001.2 EOF02.3 ME07.507.507.510.006.506.5908908 90807.507.3 ME02.303.003.304.004.404.004.905.805.804.904.203.203.302.903.002.202.302.502.501.702.002.401.701 2 ME01.605.305.602.1 EOF01.604.905.204.905.304.904.805.306.206.205.405.706.604.104.803.703.402.402.702.602.902.602.302.602.301.902.502.802.500.9 ME01.7 ME06.706.405.805.905.706.906.805.305.405.805.904.004.108.508.307.309.809.309.007.706.906.907.406.106.1 EOF06.006.007.407.406.006.006.006.206.206.207.107.107.107.307.307.307.307.107.107.107.307.307.307.307.308.508.508.507.607.607.608.508.508.508.308.308.307.007.007.007.807.807.807.007.007.007.207.207.207.507.507.507.607.607.607.007.007.006.306.306.3908908
908908908 908909909909909909909
909 909
909
909 909909910910910910910910910 91091091007.4 EOF06.406.706.507.506.506.806.706.407.307.204.106.106.806.700.1 EOF07.3 EOF05.9 EOF05.8 EOF05.9 EOF05.9 EOF07.3 EOF06.3 EOF06.606.5 EOF03.1 EOF05.0 EOF02.602.602.602.602.602.602.602.602.602.60$7&+/,1(0$7&+/,1(&/8%+286(5(67$85$17))( ))( 0$,1%8,/',1*))( 321'3%27720 +:/ 1:/ :(7/$1'(;,67,1*<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ (;,67,1*<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('<5+:/ 352326('3523(57</,1(*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(*5$',1*/,0,76*5$',1*/,0,76352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(352326('3523(57</,1(
6$)(7<%(1&+
0$,17(1$1&($&&(660$;5811,1*6/23(0$;&52666/23( 321'3%27720 +:/ 352326('3523(57</,1(030 60LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:North*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$129(5$//'$9,'$5(<;;;;;;;;;;;%-''$5
&&,7<68%0,77$/5(9,6,21'$7( 0,11(627$352)(66,21$/(1*,1((5/<1*%/2067(11415 ALMOND AVE WST. PAUL, MN 55108HODGSON ROADLINO LAKES, MN 55014/<1*%/2067(16(1,25&20081,7,(6 5()(5726+((7&*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$11257+)25*(1(5$/127(6127(6/(*(1'5()(5(1&(.(<726,7('(7$,/6'(7$,/,'180%(5 723 '(7$,/6+((7180%(5 %27720 (;,67,1*&217285(;,67,1*6327(/(9$7,21352326('&217285352326('6327(/(9$7,210( 0$7&+(;,67,1*352326('*5$',1*/,0,76352326('6$1'68%%$6($7)5267)227('672236$3352;,0$7(62,/%25,1*/2&$7,21352326('0$1+2/( 0+ 352326('&$7&+%$6,1 &% 352326(')/$5('(1'6(&7,21 )(6 352326('+<'5$17 +<' 352326('*$7(9$/9( *9 352326('3267,1',&$7259$/9( 3,9 352326('%8,/',1*672235()(572$5&+,7(&785$/3/$163523(57</,1(1C2.1195554.6*(27(&+1,&$/7$%/(5()(57263(&($57+:25.$1'81,735,&(6127( '(37+6/,67(',17$%/(%(/2:'2127,1&/8'(5(029$/2)68,7$%/(62,/5(48,5('720((7352326('*5$'(6%RULQJ(VWLPDWHG&XW )7 * * %(1&+0$5. 01'2702180(17/2&$7('$77+(6287+($6748$'5$172)6816(7$9(18(29(5:(OHYDWLRQ 1*9' 6,7(%(1&+0$5. 7231872)+<'5$17/2&$7('$77+(6287+:(6748$'5$172)$6+675((7$1'+2'*62152$'(OHYDWLRQ 1*9' 6,7(%(1&+0$5. 7231872)+<'5$17/2&$7('$77+(6287+($6748$1'5$172)$6+675((7$1'+2'*62152$'(OHYDWLRQ 1*9' 6,7(%(1&+0$5. 7+5(6+2/'(/(9$7,2121($676,'(2)%8,/',1*/2&$7('$7+2'*62152$'(OHYDWLRQ 1*9' %(1&+0$5.6 ),(/'9(5,)<%()25(86,1*
LOT 4DRY BASIN 4P"S" DESIGNREFER TO LANDSCAPINGPLANS FOR JOINTING OFTHIS AREA24C2.12"S" DESIGN"S" DESIGN"S" DESIGN"S" DESIGN"S" DESIGN"S" DESIGN1C2.138C2.131C2.131C2.131C2.137C2.1320AC2.12REFER TO ARCHITECTURALFOR ALL TOWNHOME LAYOUTAND DIMENSIONS (TYP)19C2.12"S" DESIGNB6186C2.1322C2.1222C2.1220BC2.12WETLAND 1REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FORLAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS"S" DESIGNMATCHLINE25' TERMINATOR20' TERMINATOR17' TERMINATOR17' TERMINATORNOPARKIN
G
NOPARKIN
G
NOPARKIN
G
NOPARKIN
G
LOT 9STALL COUNT:153 REGULAR STALLS6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED6 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLSEXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66LOT 3PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03MAIN BUILDINGEXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72LOT 1LOT 6LOT 5LOT 20EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13LOT 13LOT 2LOT 15LOT 17LOT 12LOT 10LOT 16LOT 14LOT 7POND 3P NORTH PONDLOT 11LOT 8LOT 19LOT 18"S" DESIGNC2.135C2.134C2.135C2.134MAIN PARKINGNORTHWEST PARKINGNORTHEAST PARKINGDASHED AREA= FUTUREC2.135C2.134C2.135C2.134C2.135C2.13420AC2.128C2.138C2.138C2.138C2.138C2.138C2.1323C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1223C2.1224C2.1224C2.1224C2.1224C2.1224C2.1224C2.1224C2.128C2.138C2.138C2.138C2.138C2.131C2.131C2.131C2.131C2.1324C2.121C2.131C2.137C2.1324C2.1224C2.121C2.1324C2.1220AC2.127C2.1320AC2.12TRASNFORMER - REFER TOELECTRICAL FOR LAYOUTAND DIMENSIONS.20AC2.124C2.1316C2.1320AC2.1216C2.133C2.1319C2.1219C2.12REFER TO ARCHITECTURALFOR ALL TOWNHOME LAYOUTAND DIMENSIONS (TYP)B618B618B61819C2.1219C2.1219C2.12B618B618B61819C2.1219C2.12B618B61819C2.1219C2.1219C2.1219C2.12B61824C2.1219C2.1219C2.1219C2.1219C2.1219C2.126C2.1319C2.126C2.1319C2.124C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.1319C2.126C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.1324C2.1222C2.12B618DASHED AREA= FUTURE19C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B61819C2.12B618C2.1318C2.1317C2.1318C2.1317C2.1318C2.1317C2.1318C2.131723C2.1223C2.1223C2.1224C2.121C2.1324C2.127C2.137C2.137C2.1320AC2.1220AC2.12B61819C2.1219C2.12B6186C2.136C2.136C2.1322C2.1219C2.1221C2.1219C2.12B61819C2.12B61824C2.1224C2.12BUILDING COLUMNS - REFER TOARCHITECTURAL PLANS20AC2.1220AC2.12MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE23C2.126C2.136C2.136C2.136C2.1323C2.12FLAGPOLE - REFER TOARCHITECTURAL PLANS.DUMPSTERS - REFER TOARCHITECTURAL PLANS.TRASH COMPACTOR - REFERTO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.GENERATOR - REFER TOELECTRICAL PLANS.19C2.13C2.1318C2.131726272046641226175LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITE PLANDAVID A. REY10/04/20194018019601510/04/2019BJDDAR1" = 60'C1.2APUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE AMENDMENT PLAN 12/31/19MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERLYNGBLOMSTEN1415 ALMOND AVE WST. PAUL, MN 55108Lyngblomsten LinoLakes CampusNOTES:1. REFER TO SHEET C1.21, SITE PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.2. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.NORTHEAST PARKINGTOTAL STALLS = 6ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0NORTHWEST PARKINGTOTAL STALLS = 5ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0MAIN PARKINGTOTAL STALLS = 77ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 4ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 7SITE STATISTICS:030 60LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)PROPOSED CONCRETE WALKPROPOSED CONCRETE SLABPROPOSED BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENTPROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED URBAN STREET PAVEMENTPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED DECORATIVE METAL FENCEPROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNPROPOSED BOLLARDPAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSPROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSPROPERTY LINE1C2.1124C2.118C2.1222C2.111C2.122C2.1211C2.1212C2.1213C2.1223C2.1224C2.124C2.133C2.135C2.138C2.137C2.136C2.1310C2.1316C2.1311C2.1312C2.1313C2.1314C2.1315C2.1317C2.1318C2.13
LOT 4
DRY BASIN 4P
WETLAND 1
LOT 9
STALL COUNT:
153 REGULAR STALLS
6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED
6 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLS
EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66
LOT 3
PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68
PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33
PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03
MAIN BUILDING
EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72
LOT 1LOT 6 LOT 5
LOT 20
EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13
LOT 13
LOT 2
LOT 15
LOT 17
LOT 12
LOT 10
LOT 16
LOT 14
LOT 7
POND 3P NORTH POND
LOT 11
LOT 8
LOT 19
LOT 18
06.5
98.5
98.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
01.8
07.2
05.7
02.9
98.2
05.0
05.4
08.7
08.8
05.7
98.5
98.2
06.3
06.7 EOF
05.2
05.4
05.0
06.0 EOF05.3
06.0 EOF
05.4
05.104.8
06.8
06.5
06.5
05.9
06.2 EOF
07.2
06.0
07.5
02.2 EOF
98.5
98.5
98.2
98.2
98.5
07.1
01.9 EOF
05.1
07.2 EOF
06.0 EOF
06.1 EOF
05.8
05.9
07.0
06.3 EOF
05.8
04.5
05.8
05.1
04.7
04.8
05.3
05.8
06.7
06.4
06.4
05.5
06.0
06.2
06.1
05.5
07.6
07.8
07.1
06.5
05.6
05.9
05.6 06.2
06.5
06.2
07.3
06.0
07.0
06.4
05.7
06.5
06
.
0
05.9
09.1
09.4
09.1
08.5
08.0
06.6
07.5
07.4
08.3
08.7
08.2 08.5
10.1
09.7
09.7
08.6
08.5
08.2
05.6
05.9
05.6
07.2
06.9
06.9
06.3
06.9
06.9
04.6
10.1
10.3
10.3
05.5
06.3
05.8
05.5
07.1
05.4
05.6
05.4
06.7
05.8
01.5
08.7
08.6
08.5
08.4
08.6
08.9
08.6
08.6
08.3
08.3
07.8 10.0
06.4
06.4
07.7
07.7
08.0
98.002.3 ME
03.1
03.2
02.9
02.9
02.2
07.5
07.3 ME
09.8
09.8
09.806.2
06.2
06.2
09.898.7
98.5
02.7
04.1
01.2
01.5
00.2
01.3 ME
99.0
99.099.0
99.2
99.2
05.3
05.6
04.9
05.2
04.905.3
04.9
04.7
02.5
02.7
02.2
02.4
06.7
06.4
07.1
07.0
03.4
03.2
08.3
08.3
09.7
09.209.106.9
06.9
07.6
06.2
07.0
07.6
07.6
07.3
07.3
07.3
07.3 07.1
07.1
07.1
07.3
07.3
07.307.3
07.3
08.708.7
08.7
07.6
07.6
07.6
08.7
08.7
08.7
07.4
07.4
07.4
08.2
08.2
08.2
07.0
07.5
07.5
07.5 07.6
06.3
06.3
06.3 06.407.008.006.507.006.8
06.4
03.4
00.1 EOF
05.9 EOF
05.9 EOF
06.6
06.5 EOF
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
99.999.7
99.9 00.1
98.5
10.5
09.8
09.8
09.809.8
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
06.9
06.8 06.9
10.0
09.9
09.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0 10.009.805.8
01.7
98.5
10.010.0 10.009.809.809.809.810.0
10.4
10.4
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
07.2 ME
07.4 ME
07.5 ME
07.6 ME
07.7 ME
07.8 ME
07.8 ME
07.1 ME
07.5 ME
06.9 ME
06.7 ME
05.8
05.9 ME
06.2 ME
06.1
06.2
06.3
06.5
10.0
10.0
09.8
10.0
09.8
09.8
06.0
05.1
05.0
10.5
09.9
12.0
11.1
09.0 08.9
09.8
09.9
09.4
10.109.8
10.0 09.9
10.0
09.3
05.2
00.1 01.4
01.0
00.600.2
00.6
00.7
00.4
00.4
00.5
00.8
02.1
02.1
01.9
01.9
01.7
02.0
01.7
01.2
01.5
01.2
01.6
02.6
02.9
02.6
02.1
01.5
02.2
02.2
01.9
01.9
01.4
01.5
01.9
02.1
01.8
01.7
02.0
02.3
02.0
02.3
05.3 05.6
05.6
05.9
06.4
06.4 ME
03.4
02.7
02.8
02.8
02.7
02.6
02.5
02.4
02.3
02.5
02.6
02.3
02.4
02.2
01.5
01.4
01.4
01.3
01.9
01.8
01.9
01.8
03.2
03.3
03.3
03.2
02.6
02.5
01.9
02.5
02.6
01.9
02.2
02.1
02.102.202.1
03.3
03.2
02.6
01.7
02.0
02.1
02.1
02.2
02.7
02.6
02.6
02.7
03.5
03.6
03.5
03.2
03.8
03.9
05.2
05.3
05.9
05.6
05.9
06.0
06.0
05.5
05.5
05.6
07.0
07.1
06.3
06.3
06.2
06.4
07.5
06.7
07.8
06.1
02.6
02.5
02.5
02.6
04.6
04.5
04.6
04.5
03.9
04.2
03.9
06.3
06.6
06.0
06.7
06.0
06.6
06.7
05.9
05.9
07.8
08.4
08.4
08.5
07.0
09.8
09.9
09.8
09.7
09.3
09.3
09.2
08.509.209.308.909.009.108.909.008.2
08.1
08.7
08.8
07.6
07.5
07.9
07.7
07.8 08.1
08.7
08.2
08.1
07.5 07.8
08.4
09.2
09.8
09.2
09.5
08.6
09.9
09.2
09.1
08.7
08.9
08.6
08.8
08.9
07.8
08.4
07.3
08.1
06.9
06.7
06.3
06.1
06.3 EOF
06.2
06.3
07.5
07.5
07.6
04.7
03.7 05.1 EOF
04.2
07.1
07.1
07.1
06.5
06.5
06.5
05.7
05.9
05.805.8
05.906.106.005.505.706.7
06.6
08.0
07.9
08.4
08.5
08.9
09.0
09.1
09.2
09.3
09.2
09.1
09.2
08.6
08.7
07.6
07.5
06.2
06.1
05.9
07.5
07.6
06.8
06.4
06.7
06.8
07.2
06.9
07.0
08.4
07.1
07.5
07.5
07.3
07.9
07.5
06.9
07.0
06.5
06.0
05.9
07.4
06.6
06.3
06.9
07.0
06.3
07.5
07.5
07.5
07.2
07.4
07.6
07.3
07.1
07.2
07.5
07.0
07.5
06.9
06.3
06.6
06.3
06.906.1
06.0
06.9
06.4 EOF05.506.006.106.1
06.0
05.9
05.6
05.9
05.6
06.0
06.2
04.9 06.2
06.3 06.4
0
05.9 06.3
04.7
06.2
06.3
02.9
02.9 02.9 02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
02.9
00.9 ME
01.6 ME
02.2 ME01.8 ME
02.0 ME
02.4 ME
02.4 ME
02.7 ME
02.8 ME
02.5 ME
02.3 ME
02.7 ME
02.2
02.4
02.1
03.1 ME
02.2
02.5 ME
01.0 ME
03.4 ME
03.3 ME
04.0 ME
04.4 ME
03.6 ME
02.4
02.2
01.6
07.4 ME
02.7 ME
03.6 ME
03.5 ME
02.8 ME
02.2 ME
02.9
99.2 ME
00.5 ME
00.8 ME
01.7 ME
00.6 ME
00.2 ME
01.4 ME
02.3 ME
02.4 ME
02.5 ME
02.2 ME
01.8 ME
02.2 ME
02.1 ME
98.7 ME
00.7 ME
00.9 ME
99.0 ME
02.3 ME
02.9 ME
03.1 ME
03.3 ME
03.4 ME
99.2 ME 00.1 ME99.5 ME
00.4 ME
99.3 ME
99.6 ME
99.7 ME
99.8 ME
99.7 ME
99.8 ME
99.8 ME
99.8 ME
99.8 ME
00.5 ME 00.3 ME 06.8 ME 08.7 ME 10.1 ME 06.1 ME 06.2 ME 06.2 ME
06.8 ME
04.8 ME
06.8 ME
07.7 ME
07.0
06.1
06.0 ME
06.1 ME
05.7 ME
05.5 ME
05.2 ME
04.9
05.0
05.1
04.8 ME
04.8 ME
02.7 ME
01.7 ME
01.7 ME00.9 ME00.8 ME
00.8 ME00.8 ME
03.4
02.0 EOF
06.806.709.8
10.1
09.6
09.8
09.5
09.4
02.8
02.7
02.8 00.600.500.500.506.3
06.4
06.0
06.1
06.3
06.5
07.1
08.9
09.0
05.7 ME
06.1 ME
05.1
04.9
05.1
05.2
06.9 05.607.0
07.0
07.0
04.704.6
07.4
07.4
07.4
07.0
07.0 07.0
07.0
07.0
08.307.3 07.2
08.9
08.9 08.9
07.3
07.5
07.7
08.0
07.7 07.5
06.7
07.2
07.2
07.7
07.7
08.1
08.6
08.2
08.3
08.4
08.6
08.6
08.6
07.9
08.2
08.5
06.6
07.2
07.1
08.0
07.9
8
8
6 887889895
895
895895896
896
896896897 897
897
898
899899
89
9
900
900900
900
901 901901
901
901902902
902
902902902
90290
2
902 9029
0
2
902902
90
2903903903903
903
903903 9039039
0
3
903
90
3
904904
904904
904904
904904
904904
905
9059059059
0
5
905
905
905905
905905
90590590
6
906906
906906
90
6 906906906
906906
90
6
906
906
90690690
6
906906906
90
6906 906906906906906907
907
907
9079
0
7
907907
9
0
7
907907
907
907 907907
907907
907907907907 907907907907
907
907907907
90
7 908908
908 90890890
8
908
908
908
9
0
8
908
908
908908908
908
908908908909 909909909
909909909909 909909909910910910
910910910 910
910
911
0 30 60
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
NOTES
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
FLOW ARROW
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
955
54.6
BENCHMARK: MNDOT MONUMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF SUNSET AVENUE
OVER 35W
Elevation = 929.283 (NGVD29)
SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF ASH
STREET AND HODGSON ROAD.
Elevation = 906.81 (NGVD29)
SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUANDRANT OF ASH
STREET AND HODGSON ROAD.
Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29)
SITE BENCHMARK: THRESHOLD ELEVATION ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING LOCATED AT 6011
HODGSON ROAD.
Elevation = 905.36 (NGVD29)
BENCHMARKS (FIELD VERIFY BEFORE USING)
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING
ANDERSON - JOHNSON
ASSOCIATES,
INC.
7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427
FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129
DateRegistration Number
Check
Drawn
Date:
Comm
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
Lyngblomsten Lino
Lakes Campus
14115 ALMOND AVE W
ST. PAUL, MN 55108
LYNGBLOMSTEN
MINNESOTA
DAVID A. REY
40180 10/04/2019
196015
10/04/2019
BJD
DAR
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
OVERALL
1"=60'
C1.30PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE
AMENDMENT PLAN 12/31/2019
NOTE: ALL
DEVELOPMENT ON
SITE SHALL OCCUR
CONCURRENTLY
NOTE: ALL
DEVELOPMENT ON
SITE SHALL OCCUR
CONCURRENTLY
Lyngblomsten
City Council Meeting
May 11, 2020
Background•May 11 th Council
•Land Use Application
•PUD Dev Stage Plan-Amendment #1
•Omission Clubhouse
•Revise Site Plan and Grading & Drainage
Plans
2
3
April 8, 2019: CC approved PUD Development Stage Plan-Lyngblomsten Senior Community
PHASE 1
•Senior Living Community
•Cottage Homes
•Senior Campus (IL, AL & SNF)
•Club House
•PHASE 2= Restaurant
•PHASE 3 = Commercial
•50 ft buffer along west edge (Woodridge Ln)
•30 ft buffer along north edge (Rohavic Oaks)
4
Clubhouse
•2 level
•Game Room
•Kitchen
•Lounge
•Unique Design
May 11, 2020: PUD Development Stage Plan Amend #1-Omit Clubhouse to Enlarge SW Pond
5
Original Grading Plan
•Per CC approved PUD
Dev Stage Plan
•Dry Basin 4P
•SW Pond 3P
•Irrigation pumping
6
Revised Grading Plan
•Per RCWD & City
Comments
•Additional stormwater
storage needed
•Option #1
•2nd SW pond in
Commercial Area
•Valuable
commercial land
•Gateway to City
•Option #2
•Increase capacity
of SW Pond 3P
•Omit Clubhouse
and parking lotOriginal Pond 3P Enlarged Pond
3P
Surface Area 0.56 acres 0.82 acres
Volume 2.810 acre feet 3.869 acre feet
Clubhouse & Town Center Amenities
•Original Proposal
•Clubhouse = 4,450 sf
•Lounge
•Kitchen
•Dining
•Game/Rec Room
•Conference Room
•Outdoor patio
•Town Center = 10,200 sf
•Main Floor of Senior
Building 7
Revised Town Center•Increased to 18,185 sf
•8,000 sf additional common and amenity space
•Open to Neighborhood and Live-In Residents
•Outside Vendor Space
•Service dogs or banking
•Community Based Adult Day Program 8
Revised Town Center•Larger Multi-Purpose Room
•Concerts and community meeting space
•Larger Lap Pool for Water Exercises
•Larger Wellness Center
•Larger Salon w/ Nail Care
•Additional Dining
•50 seat formal, 25 seat informal café, pub and party
room
9
Planning & Zoning Board•April 8, 2020: Public Hearing
•Public comments were regarding more landscaping
screening and buffer
•Focus of Discussion is Regarding Omission of Clubhouse
to Enlarge SW Pond
•Recommend approval 5-0 vote
•PUD Final Plans/Final Plat will finalize details regarding
site plan, landscaping, trees, fences etc.
10
Council Consideration•Consider Resolution No. 20-44 Approving PUD Development
Stage Plan Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage
Plan
11
UNUSED SLIDES
12
13
Site Design, Urban Form
•Varying Building Heights
•1 story cottage home
•2 story SNF
•3 story AL
•4 story IL
1
2
3
4
14
Revised Site Plan
•NE Private Road Cul De
Sac flipped south
•NW parking stall moved
to end of cul de sac
•As supported by Res No
19-42:
•275 Ash St
Purchased
•South end of Main
Public Road aligns
with St Albans Street
•Joint Parking Facilities
and Share Driveways in
commercial area
•Full Review with PUD
Final Plan
15
Building Envelope-Setbacks
Hodgson Road
•Cottage Home = 40 ft
•Senior Campus = 25 ft
•Restaurant = 10 ft
•Commercial = 10 ft
CR J
•Commercial = 10 ft
Public Road
•Cottage Homes = 25 ft
•Clubhouse = 25 ft
•Senior Campus = 12 ft
•Corner only
•Restaurant = 15 ft
•Commercial = 15 ft
Private Road
•Cottages = 23 ft curb or
sidewalk
•Commercial = 15 ft curb or
sidewalk
North Lot Line = 30 ft
West Lot Line = 50 ft
15’
40’
25’
10’
10’
15’
12’
50’
30’
25’
Summary•PUD flexibility for building setbacks
•PUD Benefits Gained
•Increased buffer from Woodridge Neighborhood
•Implementation of Master Plan’s Urban Form Vision
•Redevelopment of City gateway
•Provide economic value and stimulus
•Provides social value with senior programs and amenities
•Higher SF home standards
•Increased landscaping
•Clubhouse and amenities
•Wetland buffer 16
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: May 11 , 2020
TOPIC: Watermark 3rd Addition
i. Consider Resolution No. 20-30 Approving PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat
ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-31 Approving Development
Agreement
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff reviewed this application with Council at the April 6, 2020 Work Session.
Watermark is a 372 acre master planned residential community consisting of 692 single family
lots and 172 townhome units totaling 864 housing units. Lennar submitted a Land Use
Application for Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. The plat proposes 96 single
family lots, 79 townhome lots and 1 outlot.
Previous Council approvals include:
• June 13, 2016: Resolution No. 16-51 approving PUD Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat
• October 9, 2017: Resolution No. 17-95 approving Amendment #1 to Land Use Plan
• December 11, 2017: Resolution No. 17-133 approving Amendment #2 to Architectural
Design Standards
• October 14, 2019: Resolution No. 19-131 approving Amendment #3 to Architectural
Design Standards
This staff report is based on the following information:
• Watermark 3rd Addition Final Plat prepared by Carlson McCain date stamped January 28,
2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Construction
Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated January 10, 2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Landscape Plans L1-L4 prepared by Carlson McCain dated
February 21, 2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Home Plans Booklet prepared by Lennar dated February 3, 2020
• Watermark Architectural Standards Matrix
2
ANALYSIS
PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
The PUD Development Stage Plan approved by Resolution No. 16-51 establishes Watermark’s
overall land use plan, street and utility layout, parks and open space plan, architectural design
standards, landscaping and lot development standards. These standards are summarized in the
PUD Master Plan Booklet and are incorporated as part of the Master Development Agreement.
Each phase (i.e. addition) of development shall submit a PUD Final Plan consistent with the
PUD Development Stage Plan.
In October 2017, Council approved an amendment to the PUD Development Stage Plan’s
overall Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan established 871 housing units. As the applicant has
worked through final plan design to address City and RCWD comments from the preliminary
plat, the number of 55’ wide Villas was reduced from 127 units to 120 units. The net number
of housing units is now 864.
The net density is 3.39 units per acre and is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s
required 3.0 to 4.5 units per acre.
October
2018
Gross Area (acres) 372.24
Wetlands & Water Bodies 45.09
Public Parks & Open Space 66.25
Arterial ROW 5.46
Other (Undevelopable) 0.62
Net Area (acres) 254.82
# of Housing Units 864
Gross Density (units/acre) 2.32
Net Density (units/acre) 3.39
Grading and Trunk Utility Improvements
Lennar commenced grading and trunk utility improvements in September 2018. Phase I
grading limits incorporate approximately 150 acres (south 1/3 of the development). The 3rd
Addition is within the Phase I grading limits.
PUD Final Plan
Watermark 3rd Addition creates 96 single family lots, 79 townhome lots and 1 outlot. The PUD
Final Plan is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan in regards to the land use plan,
street and utilities, parks and open space, lot standards and landscaping.
The following housing types and products proposed for the 3rd Addition are consistent with the
approved Land Use Plan.
3
Housing Type Lot Width Housing Product # Lots
Single Family 65’ - 75’ Landmark 64
Single Family 55’ - 60’ Discovery 32
Townhomes 32’-42’ Colonial Patriot (row) 55
Townhomes 32’-45’ Colonial Manor (back-back) 24
TOTAL 175
Architectural Standards
Resolution No. 17-133 and Resolution No. 19-131 detail architectural design standards for the
entire Watermark development. As required, a Watermark 3rd Addition Home Plans summary
booklet and Architectural Standards Matrix were submitted. The booklet and matrix detail
compliance of the housing products with the resolutions in regards to exterior materials and
styles, house elevations and garage and porch requirements. There are 20 different single
family house plans with multiple facade and elevation options for a combination of over 100
different housing styles proposed for the 3rd Addition. The townhome products also meet the
architectural design standards.
Color packages and anti-monotony plans will be included with each building permit application
to ensure that the homes elevations are varied with a minimum of five different styles and those
homes in proximity to each other not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding,
accent and roofing materials. Coventry by Alside vinyl siding with .042” panel thickness is
proposed on all the housing units. All houses have minimum 4” window trim on the side and
rear elevations to meet resolution requirements to incorporate an architectural feature into those
elevations that are visible from 20th Avenue (CSAH 54), 21st Avenue N. and the public park.
In summary, the Watermark 3rd Addition single family housing types and products and
townhomes meet the architectural design standards requirements of Resolution No. 17-133 and
Resolution No. 19-131.
Landscaping
The Watermark 3rd Addition Site Landscape Plan has been reviewed by staff and is consistent
with the PUD Development Stage Landscaping Plan. A 6 ft high screen vinyl fence is being
installed along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) that is also consistent with the plans. The
Environmental Coordinator Memo dated February 27, 2020 notes some minor comments such
as seed mix types, clear vision areas and planting details.
The Watermark Open Space Maintenance Plan has been revised to reflect correct seed mixes
and management plan. Staff will be meeting with Lennar and Prairie Restorations, Inc. to
determine the best practices for implementing this plan.
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
4
The Watermark 3rd Addition final plat has been reviewed for compliance with the
comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The proposed final plat meets the
performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance and is consistent with the PUD
Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Final Plan.
Plat Phases
The following summarizes the number of lots platted per addition:
Addition # SF Lots
Remaining
#SF Lots # TH Lots
Remaining
#TH Lots
Total # Lots
Remaining
692 172 864
1st 100 592 93 79 671
2nd 57 535 0 79 614
3rd 96 439 79 0 439
Blocks and Lots
The final plat creates 96 single family lots, 79 townhome lots and 1 outlot. The following chart
summarizes the purpose of the outlot:
Outlot Purpose
A Wetland and Open Space
Outlot A will be deeded, owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA). A copy
of the recorded deed shall be submitted to the City.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements are being dedicated on individual lots and over Outlot
A.
Street and Utilities
The 3rd Addition proposes construction of the following streets which are consistent with the
PUD Development Stage Plan:
Street Name Right-of-Way Width Street Width
(Back to Back)
Crane Drive 60 feet 32 feet
Watermark Way 60 feet 32 feet
5
Johanna Circle 60 feet 32 feet
Itasca Circle 60 feet 32 feet
Private Road
(Townhomes)
Ada Drive NA 28 feet
Jasper Court, Island Court,
Heron Court NA 24 feet
Sheets 24-26 of the Watermark 3rd Addition Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and
Street Construction Plans include “Road will be Extended in the Future” sign and street lighting
locations.
Watermain, sanitary sewer main, stormwater facilities, sidewalks and trails are being
constructed consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan. Sidewalk is being installed
along Crane Drive and Watermark Way as required.
Public Land Dedication and Fees
As approved with Resolution No. 16-51, the City will require the following combination of
land dedication and cash is lieu of land dedications:
1. Land dedication for the public and private parks will be credited from the total payment
in lieu.
2. Costs for public park improvements and trail construction will be credited from the total
payment in lieu.
3. Improvements to the private parks and recreational center will not be credited from the
total payment in lieu.
In the 3rd Addition, an 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail will be constructed 1,200 lf along the eastern
berm. A Permanent Trail Easement was recorded in March 2019 that includes this trail section.
A 10 ft wide bituminous trail will be constructed 1,000 lf along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) within
Outlot A. A Permanent Trail Easement with Description Sketch has been drafted; however,
there is a trail section from the townhome neighborhood to the south property line that needs to
be included in the easement and Trail Construction Plan Sheet 27.
Park dedication fees will also be credited for the private park land platted as Watermark, Outlot
K and Outlot I. These are the private parks in the Discovery neighborhood near Crane Drive
and the tot lot in the townhome neighborhood. Per the Master Developer Agreement (MDA),
the park dedication fees are based on an appraisal of fair market value. An appraisal was
prepared in December 2018 by Insight Realty Advisors, Inc. The credited value of Outlot K,
Watermark is $32,000 and Outlot I, Watermark is $33,000.
Lennar stated the tot lot and play equipment in the townhome neighborhood will be developed
by August 30, 2021. Per Resolution No. 16-51, credit will not be given for theses private park
improvements. The 3rd Addition Landscape Plans shall include details from the Overall
Landscape Plan detailing the tot lot site plan, landscaping and equipment.
6
The following is a summary of the land dedication and fees:
Watermark 3rd Addition
Total # Units = 175
x Park Dedication Fee $3,150
= Cash in Lieu Value $551,250
- Land dedication value (Outlot K, Watermark) ($32,000)
- Land dedication value (Outlot I, Watermark) ($33,000)
- Trail Construction Costs ($39,000)
TOTAL CASH FEE DUE = $447,250
Wetlands
Wetland delineations were approved by RCWD and USACE in 2015. The delineation
identified 28 wetlands totaling approximately 20 acres in size. The original approved WCA
Sequencing Application proposed wetland impacts, wetland creation, wetland restoration and
upland buffer establishment. In April 2018, the developer revised the application to purchase
3.3671 acres of wetland banking credits as the proposed compensatory mitigation action. The
wetland fill, impacts and mitigation (wetland bank credits) occurred within the Phase I grading
limits and are complete.
The establishment of the greenway corridor including wetlands, trails and open space on the
north end of the Watermark development is a critical component of the project and will be
developed in future phases. The Master Development Agreement details the timing,
establishment and management of that corridor.
An Open Space Easement has been dedicated over outlots containing wetlands, open space,
stormwater ponds, berms etc. The Watermark 3rd Addition Final Landscape Plan details the
location of required “Protected Open Space Area” signs.
A Conservation Easement and Declaration establishing wetland buffer (both favor of RCWD)
have been recorded over Wetland 17 (Outlot G, Preliminary Plat) as required by RCWD. When
the lots abutting this buffer are graded in the future, these signs will be located along the rear
lots lines.
Development Agreement
Master Development Agreement
7
A Master Development Agreement was recorded in March 2019. The Agreement covers the
entire 372 acre site and details the terms and conditions of City approvals, the Development
Plans, the required public and private improvements as part of the first and subsequent phase,
the standards for the timing and financing of the improvements, required HOA documents and
the terms of payment.
Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement
The City will also require our standard Development Agreement specific to each phase of
development. This agreement further details required improvements and securities. The City
Engineer has drafted this Agreement and it shall be approved by the City Council.
The complete land use application for the 3rd Addition final plat was submitted in February
2020 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the current economic situation, Lennar is
requesting the Development Agreement securities be broken into Phase 3A and 3B.
The 3rd Addition will be completed in 2 phases. 3A has 64 units and 3B has 111 units for a
total of 175 units. The Development Agreement includes a Schedule C for each phase. Phase
3A shall include the construction of the Stormwater Reuse System, the Trail and Trunk
Sanitary Sewer extension to Watermark Way and 20th Avenue. Developer shall post security,
in a form acceptable to the City, for all fees and charges in Exhibit C pertaining to Phase 3B
that are being deferred until work begins in Phase 3B.
Homeowner’s Association (HOA)
Prior to release of the final plat mylars, Lennar shall submit to the City the applicable HOA
documents and annexation amendments. The City Attorney shall review and comment prior to
recording.
Title Commitment
The City Attorney has reviewed the title commitment and final plat and notes the title
commitment shall be updated.
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
A recorded Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities between RCWD and Lennar
covers Ponds 100, 200, 300 and 20. These stormwater facilities and Pond 400 will be
eventually covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after
they have been installed and accepted by the City
A recorded stormwater declaration is required for the private facilities in the townhome area.
The current declarations include additional facilities that in the future will be covered by the
City’s Programmatic agreement in the future.
Findings of Fact
8
The Findings of Fact for Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat are detailed in
Resolution No. 20-30.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
on March 11, 2020 and recommended approval with a 3-0 vote.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 20-30
2. Final Plat
3. Resolution No. 20-31
4. Development Agreement
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-30
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PUD FINAL PLAN/FINAL PLAT
FOR WATERMARK 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City received an application for Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat approval hereafter referred to as Development; and
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed Development based on
the following plans and information:
• Watermark 3rd Addition Final Plat prepared by Carlson McCain date stamped
January 28, 2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street
Construction Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated January 10, 2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Landscape Plans L1-L4 prepared by Carlson McCain
dated February 21, 2020
• Watermark 3rd Addition Home Plans Booklet prepared by Lennar dated February
3, 2020
• Watermark Architectural Standards Matrix; and
WHEREAS, the City Council the approved the PUD Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat with Resolution No. 16-51 on June 13, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the
Development on March 11, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Development is not considered premature and meets the
performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino
Lakes hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat subject to the
conditions listed below.
2. The City Attorney reviewed the status of title/property ownership related to the
final plat and notes the title commitment shall be updated.
3. A 3rd Addition Development Agreement has been drafted and shall be executed.
4. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat have been fulfilled or
secured by the Development Agreement.
5. All fees, charges and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat have been paid
in full.
2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following
conditions:
1. Outlot A is preserved as permanent Open Space and shall be improved by the
Developer in accordance with the approved plans and upon completion and
acceptance by the city, of such improvements, it shall be owned and maintained
by a Homeowner’s Association in accordance with an approved Restoration and
Management Plan.
2. A separate fence permit is required for the fencing along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the Development subject to the following items being addressed prior to release
of final plat mylars:
1. The 3rd Addition Development Agreement shall be approved by the City Council,
executed and recorded against the property.
a. The Development Agreement will include park dedication credit for the
platted private parks, Outlot K and Outlot I, Watermark.
2. Any staff comments requiring revisions to the final plat.
3. The title commitment shall be updated.
4. A draft copy of the deed for Outlot A shall be submitted to the City for review
and approval.
5. Draft copies of the applicable Homeowner’s Association (HOA) documents shall
be submitted to the City for review and approval.
a. All applicable HOA documents shall be amended to include the revised
Open Space Maintenance Plan.
6. The Permanent Trail Easement with Description Sketch for the trail on Outlot A
shall be revised to include the trail section from the townhome neighborhood to
the south lot line.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the Development subject to the following items being addressed prior to
issuance of building permit within the 3rd Addition:
1. All comments from the City Engineer Letter dated March 4, 2020 shall be
addressed.
2. All comments from Environmental Coordinator Memo dated March 4, 2020 shall
be addressed.
3. Copies of the recorded the Homeowner’s Association (HOA) documents shall be
submitted to the City.
a. All applicable HOA documents shall be amended to include the revised
Open Space Maintenance Plan.
4. A co py of the recorded deed for Outlot A shall be submitted to the City.
5. A copy of the recorded Permanent Trail Easement with Description Sketch for the
trail on Outlot A and Townhome Neighborhood shall be submitted to the City.
6. Watermark 3rd Addition Landscape Plan Sheets:
3
a. The plans shall include landscaping and foundation planting details for
townhome neighborhood consistent with the Overall Landscape Plan.
b. The plans shall include details for the tot lot site plan, landscaping, and
play equipment, etc. consistent with the Overall Landscape Plan.
c. The City’s January 2019 “Protected Open Space Area” sign detail shall be
used.
d. The plans shall include fence details.
e. The plan sheet shall clearly note which sections of fence have already
been installed and which sections are going to be installed with 3rd
Addition.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANE DRIVEBALSAMWAY CRANE DR.JOHANNA CIRCLEWATE
R
M
A
R
K
WA
YITASCACIRCLEWATERMAR
K
W
A
Y INSET 'C'of 5 sheets)(see sheet 4INSET 'D'(see sheet 5of 5 sheets)INSET 'A'(see sheet 2of 5 sheets)INSET 'B'(see sheet 3of 5 sheets)
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANEDRIVEBAL
S
A
M
W
A
Y INSET 'A'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONINSET 'B'SEE DETAIL 'A'SEE DETAIL 'B'DETAIL 'A'DETAIL 'B'DETAIL 'C'SEE DETAIL 'C'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANE DRIVE
JOHANNA CIRCLEWAT
E
R
M
A
R
K
W
A
Y INSET 'C'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONITASCACIRCLEWATERMAR
K
W
A
Y INSET 'D'
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-31
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR WATERMARK 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat for Watermark 3rd
Addition with Resolution No. 20-30 on May 11 , 2020; and
WHEREAS, the City’s subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution
of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the Development Agreement between US Home Corporation and the City of
Lino Lakes for Watermark 3rd Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such
agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
and
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Watermark 3rd Addition
THIS AGREEMENT is made this _____ day of ______________, 2020, by and between the
City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and U.S. Home Corporation, A Delaware
corporation d/b/a Lennar Corporation (“Developer”).
1. Subdivision. Developer received preliminary plat approval from the City by Resolution No.
No. 16-51 for a plat known as Watermark (“Subdivision”). Unless otherwise stated, all
terms and conditions of this Agreement relate to work within the Subdivision.
2. Final Plat Approval/Phasing of Work. The City’s approval of the final plat of Watermark
3rd Addition, as legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, is contingent upon
execution and delivery of this agreement and all required petitions, bonds, security, and
documents, and satisfaction of all conditions of approval required by Resolution No. 20-
30. The Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Developer intends to undertake
work in the 3rd Addition in two distinct phases, hereafter referred to as Phases 3A and
3B. The phases are identified in Exhibit B. No work may be begin in the Phase 3B area
until the City Engineer has confirmed that all Phase 3B fees, escrows, and letters of
credit required by this Agreement for Phase 3B have been paid and posted.
3. Phased Development. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions
of the plat if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been
remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development
Agreements for such phases are approved by the City.
4. Developer Plans.
a. The Subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following Developer
Plans, original copies of which are on file with the City Engineer. The Developer
Plans may be prepared and revised after entering into this Agreement but must
be approved by the City before commencement of any work. If the plans vary
from the written terms of this Agreement, this Agreement shall control.
b. The Developer Plans as of the date of this Agreement are:
i. Watermark 3rd Addition Final Plat, containing 5 sheets, prepared by
Carlson McCain date stamped January 28, 2020.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 2
ii. Watermark 3rd Addition Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Storm Sewer and
Street Construction plan set containing 30 sheets, prepared by Carlson
McCain dated January 10, 2020.
iii. Watermark Grading, Development & Erosion Control Plan, containing 27
sheets, prepared by Carlson McCain revised and submitted on December
13, 2019.
iv. Watermark 3rd Addition Landscape Plans, containing 4 sheets, prepared
Carlson McCain dated February 21, 2020.
5. Permits. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and
development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and
Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior
to the City awarding construction contracts for public improvements.
6. Developer Improvements. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these
improvements, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements ,” which
contractor shall be approved by the City in its absolute discretion. The cost of
Developer Improvements is as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto. All Developer
Improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the
approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer shall
construct and install at the Developer's expense the following improvements according
to the following terms and conditions:
a. Site Grading
i. No grading shall commence until all requirements of the Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD) have been satisfied.
ii. All site grading shall be conducted in accordance with the grading plan as
approved by the City and in accordance with NPDES and RCWD
requirements. The Developer shall perform the work in accordance with
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements.
b. Grading and Erosion Control
i. The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown
on the approved grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a
revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other
regulatory agencies.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 3
ii. The street right-of-way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water
drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility
construction.
iii. The Developer shall be responsible for ascertaining that site geotechnical
and groundwater conditions are adequate and conforming with the
grading and site improvement as proposed.
iv. The Developer’s engineer shall certify in writing, with an as-built survey,
that all grading complies with the approved grading plan prior to issuance
of any building permits.
v. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris within public right -of-
ways and drainage and utility easements resulting from construction by
the Developer, its purchasers, builders and contractors within five (5)
days after notification by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for
all necessary street and storm sewer maintenance, including street
sweeping, until all home construction is completed, unless otherwise
released by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards
develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on them, including
detour signs if necessary. If and when the streets become impassable,
such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain
a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary
streets.
c. Final street grading, subbase, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, and
bituminous base course and wear course shall be furnished and installed.
d. Sidewalks, paths and street lighting as required by the City.
e. Storm sewers, when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including
all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances, shall be
furnished and installed.
f. Sanitary sewer mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building
services and other appurtenances, shall be furnished and installed.
g. Water mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services,
hydrants, valves and other appurtenances, shall be furnished and installed.
h. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot, block, and outlot corners
and at all other angle points on boundary lines consistent with the final plat.
Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been
completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 4
corner irons on the back property line shall be installed so that th e top of the
iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the
approved grading plan. Guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark
these irons.
i. Landscaping shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the approved
plans, including boulevard trees.
j. The Developer shall arrange for all gas, telephone, cable TV and electric utility
services to the Subdivision in accordance with City Code and State law. The
utilities are required to be located within a joint trench. Stree t light installations
shall be initiated by the Developer with City Engineer approval. The Developer is
solely responsible for the cost of utility installation.
k. The Developer shall install mailboxes in accordance with Federal and Postal
Service regulations.
l. The Developer shall install conservation easement signs per City standard detail
plates prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements
enumerated in Paragraph 6 by November 30, 2021. The Developer shall install the Tot
Lot by Aug 30, 2021. The Developer may request a reasonable extension of time from
the City. If the extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security
posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date.
8. Record Drawings.
a. Upon project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings, in electronic
format, of all public and private infrastructure improvements, including grading,
sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer facilities, and roads, constructed by
Developer. The files shall be drawn in Anoka County NAD 83 Coordinate system
and provided in both AutoCAD .dwg and Adobe .pdf file formats. The plans shall
include accurate locations, dimensions, elevations, grades, slopes and all other
pertinent information concerning the complete work.
b. The Developer shall submit certified compaction testing results for the site
grading operations.
c. A summary of the record plan attribute data for the storm sewer, watermain,
and sanitary sewer structures and pipes shall be submitted in the form of an
Excel Spreadsheet as provided by the City Engineer.
d. No securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted
and accepted by the City Engineer.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 5
9. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Security.
a. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any
and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction
of all Developer Improvements. Concurrent with the execution hereof by the
Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with
the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on
one hundred fifty (150%) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's
Improvements. The Developer may elect to post separate security for Phases 3A
and 3B.
b. Irrevocable Letter of Credit. If an Irrevocable Letter of Credit is utilized, it shall be
for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state that it is
issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and
conditions of this Development Agreement and construction of all required
improvements referenced therein in accordance with the ordinances and
specifications of the City. The letter shall be in a form, and from a bank, as
approved by the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on
any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the
terms and conditions of this agreement. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be
automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future
expiration dates on an annual basis, unless at least sixty (60) days prior to the
expiration date, the Community Development Director and City Engineer, are
notified by certified mail or overnight courier, that the Letter of Credit will not be
extended.
c. Alternatively, the Developer may enter into a Public Improvement Surety
Agreement, subject to City approval.
d. Reduction of Security. The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit
or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements
at the time of the requested reduction.
10. Warranty. The Developer warrants all utility work required to be performed by it against
poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two years after its completion and
acceptance by the City. All new streets shall be warranted by the developer for a period
of one year from the time the final inspection of the street is completed and accepted
by the City. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and
disease free for 12 months after planting. Prior to final acceptance of the Developer
Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the
warranty provisions of this Agreement. The amount shall be determined by the City
Engineer.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 6
11. Dedication. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, at no cost to the City, any
permanent or temporary easements that may be necessary for the construction and
installation of the Developer Improvements. All such easements required by the City
shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City
shall determine.
12. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and
construction required by this Agreement, the public improvements lying within public
right-of-way and easements shall become City property without further notice or action
unless the improvements are to be deemed private infrastructure.
13. Recording and Release. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development
Agreement shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The
Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development
Agreement with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and
owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1.
14. Escrow for City’s Costs.
a. The Developer agrees to establish a non-interest bearing escrow accounts for
Phases 3A and 3B with the City in amounts determined by the City Administrator
or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the
development of the Subdivision including, but not limited to, the following (See
Exhibit C for breakdown of costs for Phases 3A and 3B escrows):
i. Planning/ Review
ii. Administration - 3% of Developer Improvement Costs
iii. City Engineering
iv. Street lighting installation (by utility company, developer to initiate)
v. Traffic signing improvements
vi. Boulevard tree planting
vii. Street, storm sewer and pond maintenance
viii. Property Taxes. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1st,
any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of
this plat shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
b. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the Developer shall make such
additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 7
reimburse itself from the Escrow with suitable documentation supporting the
charges.
15. Developer Fees. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall pay
the following fees related to the development of the Subdivision (See Exhibit C for
breakdown of costs):
a. Park Dedication
All park dedication fees will be collected with phase 3A. Park dedication
fees will be credited for the private park land platted as Watermark,
Outlot K and Outlot I. Per the Master Developer Agreement (MDA), the
park dedication fees are based on an appraisal of fair market value. An
appraisal was prepared in December 2018 by Insight Realty Advisors, Inc.
The credited value of Outlot K, Watermark is $32,000 and Outlot I,
Watermark is $33,000.
The tot lot, play equipment and associated landscaping on Outlot I,
Watermark shall be completed by August 30, 2021. Per Resolution No.
16-51, credit will not be given for theses private park improvements.
Park dedication fees will also be credited for trail construction costs.
The Park Dedication Fee for this site is calculated as follows:
Watermark 3rd Addition
Total # Units = 175
x Park Dedication Fee $3,150
= Cash in Lieu Value $551,250
- Land dedication value (Outlot K, Watermark) ($32,000)
- Land dedication value (Outlot I, Watermark) ($33,000)
- Trail Construction Costs ($39,000)
TOTAL CASH FEE DUE = $447,250
b. The Developer shall pay 15 months of maintenance and energy costs for street
lights installed within the Subject Property at the rate of $8/month/light. After
that the City will assume the costs.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 8
c. Sealcoating. The Developer will pay the cost of sealcoating the streets within the
development at a cost of $73,260. The sealcoating will be completed within
three to seven years following completion of the wear course placement.
d. GIS Mapping Fees
e. Trunk Sewer Connection Fees
The City established trunk utility connection fees to uniformly distribute the
costs of public trunk sanitary sewer infrastructure. The Trunk Utility Connection
Fee consists of two components; a Trunk Charge and an Availability Charge.
Trunk Charge
The trunk charge for Phase 3Ashall be paid at the time of subdivision approval or
at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. The trunk charge for Phase 3B shall be
paid prior to any work on Phase 3B. Residential trunk charges are based on one
unit per dwelling unit. Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (CII) trunk charges are
based on a factor of 2.92 units per acre.
Sanitary Sewer $1,606.00 Per Unit
Availability Charge
For residential properties, the availability charge for Phase 3Ashall be paid at the
time of subdivision approval or at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. The
availability charge for Phase 3B shall be paid prior to any work on Phase 3B.
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional availability charges shall be paid at the time
of building permit. Fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge
(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES).
Residential uses shall be assigned one unit per dwelling unit unless otherwise
noted by MCES.
City Sewer (CSAC) $1,502.00 Per SAC Unit
Trunk sewer unit charges addressed under this paragraph are in addition to any
SAC charges imposed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. An
estimate of the total charge and the trunk utility credit for de veloper installed
trunk oversizing is specified in Exhibit C.
f. Trunk Water Connection Fees
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 9
The City established trunk utility connection fees to uniformly distribute the
costs of public trunk water infrastructure. The Trunk Utility Connection Fee
consists of two components; a Trunk Charge and an Availability Charge.
Trunk Charge
The trunk charge for Phase 3A shall be paid at the time of subdivision approval or
at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. The trunk charge for Phase 3B shall be
paid prior to any work on Phase 3B. Residential trunk charges are based on one
unit per dwelling unit. Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (CII) trunk charges are
based on a factor of 2.92 units per acre.
Water $2,306.00 Per Unit
Availability Charge
For residential properties, the availability charge for Phase 3A shall be paid at the
time of subdivision approval or at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. The
availability charge for Phase 3B shall be paid prior to any work on Phase 3B.
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional availability charges shall be paid at the time
of building permit. Fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge
(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES).
Residential uses shall be assigned one unit per dwelling unit unless otherwise
noted by MCES.
City Water (CWAC) $1,451.00 Per SAC Unit
An estimate of the total charge and the trunk utility credit for developer installed
trunk oversizing is specified in Exhibit C.
g. Surface Water Management Area Charges
The City established a trunk area charge to uniformly distribute the costs of
public trunk surface water infrastructure and water quality improvements. The
Surface Water Management Charge shall be based on developable acreage, in
the amount specified in Exhibit C. The charge for Phase 3A shall be paid at the
time of subdivision approval. The charge for Phase 3B shall be paid prior to any
work on Phase 3B.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 10
16. Assessment of Charges and Waiver of Rights.
a. In consideration of the construction of City Improvements listed in Paragraph 8
and /or provision of sewer, water and storm water services, the Developer
agrees that the costs of City Improvements together with Trunk Sewer Unit
Charge, Trunk Water Unit Charge and the Surface Water Management Area
Charge (collectively, “the Charges”) may be assessed against the Subdivision
parcels. The Developer hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive
objections to the special assessments, including notice and hearing
requirements, any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the
properties, and any right to appeal.
b. Unless the Developer pays the entire balance owed for the Charges
contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall
provide to the City a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit in an amount
equal to 35% of the total assessments for the Charges as estimated by the City
Engineer (see Exhibit C). The letter of credit shall be in a form, and from a bank,
as approved by the City. The letter of credit or cash escro w may be used by the
City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments. The cash
escrow or letter of credit shall remain in place throughout the term of the special
assessments. The letter of credit may not be terminated without the City’s
written consent.
c. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees that within 30 days after the
date of sale of a lot, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, at its own
cost and expense, shall pay the entire unpaid charges assessed or to be assessed
under this agreement against such property.
d. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been
levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum
of cash equal to 120% of the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for
such Charges that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the
City shall issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full.
Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Devel oper shall be liable to
the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus
arising from the payment based upon such estimate.
e. Acceleration upon Default. In the event the Developer violates any of the
covenants, conditions or agreements herein, violates any ordinance, rule or
regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or other
governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat or development, or fails to
pay when due any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant to this
agreement, or any interest thereon, the City at its option, in addition to its rights
and remedies hereunder, after 10 days written notice to the Developer, may
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 11
declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied
pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City may
seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the security
provided herein. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the
outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest the City
may certify such outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 429.061, subdivision 3, for collection the
following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the
Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then
estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable
attorney's fees, and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if
more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. In addition to any other
rights and remedies upon Developer’s default, the City may refuse to issue
building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for any property within the
Subdivision until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction
of the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by
the City in the enforcement of this agreement, or any portion thereof, including
court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees, if the City prevails in
any enforcement action.
17. Building Permits. No building permits shall be issued until:
a. Site grading, certified compaction testing, City sewer, water, storm sewer, curb
and gutter, and bituminous base construction of the streets, temporary street
signs, gas, electric, and telephone are completed and approved by the City,
except as provided below.
i. Sidewalks and trails shall be installed within 6 months of the bituminous
base course. Extensions may be approved by the City Engineer, due to
weather conditions, upon receipt of a written request in writing by the
Developer to the City. In no case shall such extension extend beyond one
year from the date of installation of bituminous base course.
ii. Model Homes: Structures may be installed as model homes consistent
with City ordinance upon approval of the final plat. A record drawing of
the site grading for the model home lots shall be submitted prior to
issuance of building permits for the model homes.
iii. If any building permits for model homes are issued prior to the
completion and acceptance of public improvements, the Developer
assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public
improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City,
the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees,
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 12
agents or third parties. Any such costs shall be reimbursed from
Developer’s escrow.
18. Special Provisions.
a. Watermark 3rd Addition will be completed in 2 phases 3A and 3B. This
Agreement includes a Schedule C for each phase. Phase 3A shall include the
construction of the Stormwater Reuse System, and the Trail. Developer shall
post security, in a form acceptable to the City, for all fees and charges in Exhibit
C pertaining to Phase 3B that are being deferred until work begins in Phase 3B.
b. The Developer shall submit a sanitary sewer plan sheet, to be included with the
construction plans, for construction of the trunk sewer along 20th Ave from
manhole 9 where it exists today to Watermark Way. Said plan sheet shall be
approved by the City.
c. Outlot A is preserved as permanent Open Space and shall be improved by the
Developer in accordance with the approved plans and upon complet ion and
acceptance by the city of such improvements, it shall be owned and maintained
by a Homeowner’s Association in accordance with an approved Restoration and
Management Plan.
d. A separate fence permit is required for the fencing along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue).
19. Hours of Construction Activity.
All construction activity shall be limited to the hours as follows:
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed
20. Insurance. Developer or its general contractor shall take out and maintain until one
year after the City accepted the Developer Improvements, public liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property
damage which may arise out of the Developer's or general contractor’s work, as the
case may be, or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed
by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred
Thousand and no/100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no/100
($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less
than One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a
combination single limit policy of Two Million and no/100 ($2,000,000.00) Dollars or
more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional
insured on the policy, and the Developer or its general contractor shall file with the City
a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 13
provide that the City must be given ten days advance written notice of the cancellation
of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the
required notice.
21. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to
be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the
Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City,
provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours
in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary
for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does
any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy the cost in whole or
in part as a special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights
to notice of hearing and hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such
assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429.
22. General.
a. Binding Effect
The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and
shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and
shall be deemed covenants running with the land, unless otherwise released
pursuant to section 14 of this Agreement.
b. Validity.
If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this
agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of
the Development Agreement.
c. Notices
Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or
demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other
party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United
States mail to the addresses below by certified mail (return receipt requested).
Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally
or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of
the parties are as set forth until changed by notice given as above.
Attn: Joe Jablonski
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 14
U.S Home Corporation
16305 36th Avenue, Suite 600
Plymouth, MN 55446
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
23. Land Use Controls - Planned Unit Development.
a. Watermark is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as approved by the City Council
by Ordinance No. 04-16, Resolution No. 16-151, Resolution No. 19-137, and
Resolution No. 20-30.
24. Master Development Agreement. Watermark is governed by the terms of this
Agreement, as well as the terms of the Master Development Agreement between the
Developer and City. The two Agreements shall be construed together, and the
requirements and obligations of the Agreements are cumulative. In the event of a direct
conflict between the two Agreements, the Agreement imposing the greater obligation
on Developer shall govern.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 15
DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES
By ______________________ By _________________________
Mayor
Its ______________________ ATTEST
By _________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2020,
by Rob Rafferty as Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2020
by Julianne Bartell as City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 16
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF __________ )
On this _______ day of _______________, 2020, before me, a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared ____________, __________________ of
___________________. (Developer), who executed the foregoing instrument.
______________________________
Notary Public
This instrument was drafted by:
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 17
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Outlots H and L, WATERMARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
AND
Outlot B, WATERMARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 18
EXHIBIT B
Final Plat with Phase 3A and 3B
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANE DRIVEBALSAMWAY CRANE DR.JOHANNA CIRCLEWATE
R
M
A
R
K
WA
YITASCACIRCLEWATERMAR
K
W
A
Y INSET 'C'of 5 sheets)(see sheet 4INSET 'D'(see sheet 5of 5 sheets)INSET 'A'(see sheet 2of 5 sheets)INSET 'B'(see sheet 3of 5 sheets)
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANEDRIVEBAL
S
A
M
W
A
Y INSET 'A'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONINSET 'B'SEE DETAIL 'A'SEE DETAIL 'B'DETAIL 'A'DETAIL 'B'DETAIL 'C'SEE DETAIL 'C'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONCRANE DRIVE
JOHANNA CIRCLEWAT
E
R
M
A
R
K
W
A
Y INSET 'C'
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYINGWATERMARK 3RD ADDITIONITASCACIRCLEWATERMAR
K
W
A
Y INSET 'D'
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 19
EXHIBIT C
Phase 3A Securities, Escrows & Fees
5/1/2020
EXHIBIT C
Securities, Escrows & Fees
PROJECT: Watermark 3rd Addition Phase 3A NUMBER OF REU's (utility):64
APPLICANT: US Home Corporation NUMBER OF REU's (park):175
IMPROVEMENTS COST
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT COSTS (Public)
SITE GRADING $0
EROSION CONTROL $10,000
LANDSCAPING $140,000
TRAIL $39,000
STREETS $701,383
STORM SEWER CONST.$386,654
SANITARY SEWER CONST.$361,575
WATERMAIN CONST.$241,840
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING $45,000
Total $1,925,452.00
Letter of Credit Amount X 150%$2,888,178.00
ESCROW for CITY'S COSTS
PLANNING/ REVIEW $3,800
ADMINISTRATION $57,770
ENGINEER PLAN REVIEW $19,255
ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $67,391
PROJECT FINAL DOCUMENTS & CITY ENGINEER $5,000
STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION $15,000
STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE $5,000
PROPERTY TAXES $0
TRAFFIC AND SIGNING IMPROVEMENTS $2,400
BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $0
Total $175,616
DEVELOPMENT FEES
PARK DEDICATION (Includes 3A & 3B)$551,250
PARK DEDICATION CREDIT (Includes 3A & 3B) ($104,000)
Subtotal Park Dedication Fee $447,250
AUAR $0
SEAL COATING FEE $36,630
GIS MAPPING FEE $5,760
STREET LIGHTING OPERATION $720
Total $490,360
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$102,784
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $96,128
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER CREDIT
TRUNK WATERMAIN
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$147,584
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $92,864
TRUNK WATERMAIN CREDIT
TOTAL TRUNK SEWER & WATER FEES $439,360
Letter of Credit Amount X 35% $153,776
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT $158,085
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CREDIT $0
TOTAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES $158,085
SUMMARY OF SECURITIES, ESCROW & FEES
SECURITY: DEVELOPER IMP'MENT COSTS $2,888,178.00
ESCROW FOR CITY COSTS $175,616.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES $648,445.00
SECURITY: TRUNK FEES $153,776.00
Watermark 3rd Addition
Development Agreement
May 11, 2020
page 20
EXHIBIT D
Phase 3B Securities, Escrows & Fees
5/1/2020
EXHIBIT D
Securities, Escrows & Fees
PROJECT: Watermark 3rd Addition Phase 3B NUMBER OF REU's (utility):111
APPLICANT: US Home Corporation NUMBER OF REU's (park):0
IMPROVEMENTS COST
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT COSTS (Public)
SITE GRADING $0
EROSION CONTROL $11,000
LANDSCAPING $145,000
TRAIL $0
STREETS $812,568
STORM SEWER CONST.$277,710
SANITARY SEWER CONST.$771,411
WATERMAIN CONST.$370,350
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING $45,000
Total $2,433,039.00
Letter of Credit Amount X 150%$3,649,558.50
ESCROW for CITY'S COSTS
PLANNING/ REVIEW $3,800
ADMINISTRATION $73,000
ENGINEER PLAN REVIEW $24,330
ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $85,156
PROJECT FINAL DOCUMENTS & CITY ENGINEER $5,000
STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION $15,000
STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE $5,000
PROPERTY TAXES $0
TRAFFIC AND SIGNING IMPROVEMENTS $2,400
BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $0
Total $213,686
DEVELOPMENT FEES
PARK DEDICATION $0
PARK DEDICATION CREDIT $0
Subtotal Park Dedication Fee $0
AUAR $0
SEAL COATING FEE $36,630
GIS MAPPING FEE $9,990
STREET LIGHTING OPERATION $720
Total $47,340
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$178,266
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $166,722
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER CREDIT ($294,559)
TRUNK WATERMAIN
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$255,966
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $161,061
TRUNK WATERMAIN CREDIT ($6,691)
TOTAL TRUNK SEWER & WATER FEES $460,765
Letter of Credit Amount X 35% $161,268
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT $274,179
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CREDIT $0
TOTAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES $274,179
SUMMARY OF SECURITIES, ESCROW & FEES
SECURITY: DEVELOPER IMP'MENT COSTS $3,649,558.50
ESCROW FOR CITY COSTS $213,686.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES $321,519.00
SECURITY: TRUNK FEES $161,268.00
Watermark 3rd Addition
City Council
May 11, 2020
1
Watermark Overview•April 6, 2020: Work Session
•Reviewed overall Watermark development
•Reviewed 3rd Addition
•Tonight’s Meeting
•Watermark 3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
•Development Agreement
2
3Main Street I-35E•Comprised 12 individual parcels
4
•372 acre master planned residential community
•692 single family lots + 172 townhome units = 864 housing units total
•Different neighborhoods with varying lot widths & sizes
•55’ to 75’ width
•130’ deep
PUD Final Plan/Final Plat•Each phase (i.e. addition) of development shall submit a PUD
Final Plan/Final Plat.
•City’s responsibility in reviewing and approving final plans and
final plats is to determine that they substantially conform to
with the previously approved PUD Development Stage Plan
and Preliminary Plat.
5
6•96 SF lots
•79 TH lots
•175 total lots
•1 outlot (wetland and open space)
7
Housing Type Lot Width Housing Product # Lots
Single Family 65’ -75’Landmark 64
Single Family 55’ -60’Discovery 32
Townhomes 32’-42’Colonial Patriot (row)55
Townhomes 32’-45’Colonial Manor (back-back)24
TOTAL 175
Architectural Standards•Res No 17 -133 detailed arch design standards for Watermark
•Exterior materials & styles and House elevations
•Garage and porch requirements
•Watermark 3rd Addition Home Plans booklet
•Architectural Standards Matrix
•20 different single family house plans
•Combination of over 100 different elevations and floor plans
•Color packages and anti-monotony are submitted with BP
8
9
Park Dedication
•3 sections of trail construction
•Credit for Private Parkland
•TH Tot Lot Construction by Aug 2021
Watermark 3rd Addition
Total # Units =175
x Park Dedication Fee $3,150
= Cash in Lieu Value $551,250
-Land dedication value (Outlot K, Watermark)($32,000)
-Land dedication value (Outlot I, Watermark)($33,000)
-Trail Construction Costs ($39,000)
TOTAL CASH FEE DUE =$447,250
Plat Phases
10
Addition # SF Lots
Remaining #SF
Lots # TH Lots
Remaining
#TH Lots
Total # Lots
Remaining
692 172 864
1st 100 592 93 79 671
2nd 57 535 0 79 614
3rd 96 439 79 0 439
Development Agreements•Master Development Agreement
•Covers entire 372 acre site
•Lennar, Mattamy Homes and City are parties
•Details terms establishing overall Watermark development
•Development Agreement and PUD Agreement
•Standard DA specific to each addition
•3A and 3B
•HOA Documents recorded prior to issuance of building
permits
11
123A = 64 units
3B = 111 units
3rd Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
•PUD Final Plan is consistent with the PUD Development
Stage Plan in regards to:
•land use plan
•street
•utilities
•parks and open space
•lot standards
•landscaping
•Final Plat is consistent with Preliminary Plat 13
Planning & Zoning Board•March 11, 2020
•Recommended approval with a 3-0 vote
14
Council Action
•Consider Resolution No. 20-30 Approving
PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
•Consider Resolution No. 20-31 Approving
Development Agreement
15
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
MEETING DATE: May 11, 2020
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 20-46 Adopting AUAR Update
for I-35E Corridor
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting City Council action to adopt the AUAR update for the I-35E Corridor.
BACKGROUND
The I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is an environmental review
document that analyzed potential impacts of development within a study area of 4,500 acres.
The City of Lino Lakes prepared the AUAR in accordance with MN Rules 4410. The final
document was adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council on October 24, 2005. The AUAR
serves as a substitute environmental review. As long as a development project is consistent
with the assumptions of the analyses in the AUAR, no additional environmental review is
required.
In order to remain valid as a substitute form of environmental review, the AUAR must be
revised under certain criteria. One of the criteria is the passing of five years. The City has
previously approved updates in 2010 and 2015. The 2020 update identifies development or
changes that have occurred during the last five years. The document was updated to reflect
changes which included the modification of the three development scenarios investigated.
These include:
1) Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Full Build Out Land Use
2) Modified Full Build Out with increased residential and commercial development and
reduction in industrial development
3) The City’s existing 2030 Comprehensive Plan
WSB and Associates, the City’s Engineer, completed the draft update in February of 2020.
Notice, of the documents availability for review, was published in the Environmental Quality
Board (EQB) Monitor and made available for public and state agency review. The City
received comments from four agencies:
• Metropolitan Council
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
• Minnesota Department of Administration/State Historic Preservation Office
• Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
A summary of the comments and the City’s response is included in Appendix I of the
document. A fifth agency, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, responded that they
had reviewed the update and had no comment.
ANALYSIS
The original I-35E AUAR was a very comprehensive document covering the City’s 35E
corridor from Birch Street to our northern city limits. The most significant developments over
the past five years include the 372 acre Watermark residential development and the 402,000
square foot Distribution Alternatives fulfillment center on 21st Avenue. Each of these projects
were subject to the mitigation requirements of the AUAR including, but not limited to
transportation and water management improvements.
The AUAR update generally provides an assessment of current conditions based on changes
over the past five years and assessment of comprehensive plan and development scenario
changes. Each of the revised scenarios are within the development thresholds assumed in the
original AUAR.
The Mitigation Plan, included in Appendix H, was updated to reflect changing conditions or
regulatory requirements as necessary.
Once the update is approved, a copy of the resolution will be forwarded to all required
government agencies and the Environmental Quality Board (EQB).
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed the document on April 29, 2020 and recommended
approval of the update.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 20-46.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 20-46
2. Draft AUAR Update, dated April 15, 2020
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 20-46
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATE TO THE ALTERNATIVE URBAN
AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) FOR THE LINO LAKES I-35E CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, an AUAR Update has been completed for the project pursuant to Minnesota Rules
4410 and identifies and assesses the environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated
with the I-35E Corridor Area;
WHEREAS, the I-35E Corridor Area is located on approximately 4,500 acres located in the
northeastern portion of Lino Lakes;
WHEREAS, the AUAR was updated pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610;
WHEREAS, the AUAR Update was distributed for the required 10-day comment period and
published in the EQB Monitor;
WHEREAS, comments received on the AUAR Update have generated information adequate to
determine mitigation measures associated with the potential development in this area;
WHEREAS, no agency objections were filed for the AUAR Update;
WHEREAS, the comments received and responses developed are included in the public record
for the AUAR;
WHEREAS, development in the I-35E Corridor Area is expected to comply with all Lino
Lakes and review agency standards as well as the mitigation measures outlined in the AUAR
Update.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby adopts the I-35E Corridor Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update dated April
15, 2020.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 11th day of May, 2020.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
2020 ALTERNATIVE URBAN
AREAWIDE REVIEW
UPDATE
I-35E CORRIDOR AUAR UPDATE
LINO LAKES, MN
APRIL 15, 2020
Prepared for:
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
WSB PROJECT NO. 015144-000
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 1
I-35E CORRIDOR AUAR UPDATE
This document provides for an update to the Lino Lakes I-35E Corridor AUAR. The original AUAR was
completed in 2005. Updates were adopted in 2010 and 2015. This document serves as the 2020 five-year
update. An abbreviated version of the EAW questionnaire form has been used for this update to assist in
the review of this AUAR Update. The following figures and appendices are included in this Update.
Figures
Figure 1 – Project Location
Figure 2 – Revised Scenario 1
Figure 3 – Revised Scenario 2
Figure 4 – 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Figure 5 – Developments
Appendices
Appendix A – Figures
Appendix B – Stormwater Management Memo
Appendix C – Water Appropriation Memo
Appendix D – Wastewater Management Memo
Appendix E – Transportation Memo
Appendix F – SHPO and DNR Information
Appendix G – Contamination Review Memo
Appendix H – Mitigation Plan
Appendix I – Responses to Comments
1. Project title: Lino Lakes I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
2. Proposer: NA 3. RGU City of Lino Lakes
Contact person: Michael Grochala
Title: Community Development Director
Address: 600 Town Center Pkwy
City, State, ZIP: Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Phone: (651) 982-2427
Email: mgrochala@linolakes.us
4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one)
NA
5. Project Location:
County: Anoka
City/Township: Lino Lakes
6. Project Description:
Overview
The City of Lino Lakes adopted the I-35E Corridor AUAR in conformance with Minnesota Rules 4410
in 2005. The City has subsequently updated the AUAR every five years. The AUAR study area is
approximately 4,500 acres and is located in the northeastern portion of the City as shown in Figure 1.
Development Scenarios
Three development scenarios were included in the 2005 AUAR and Updates. The City has since
updated its 2040 Comprehensive Plan and reviewed the scenarios. Three updated scenarios are
included in this update and are consistent with the original AUAR. These revised scenarios are within
the original density thresholds of the original AUAR.
Revised Scenario 1 – Draft 2040 Full Build Out Land Use
This scenario is in conformance with the current, draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This scenario
has a higher industrial use and less residential than the Revised Scenario 2. It is still within the
assumptions of the original AUAR. Table 1 provides a summary of this uses for this scenario.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 2
Figure 2 shows the studied land uses.
Revised Scenario 2
This scenario has higher residential and commercial land use, with less industrial than Revised
Scenario 1. It is still within the assumptions of the original AUAR. Table 1 provides a summary of
this uses for this scenario. Figure 3 shows the studied land uses.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
To address comments obtained during the AUAR Update comment period, the current 2030
Comprehensive Plan scenario has been included. This scenario is in conformance with the
currently approved Comprehensive Plan. It is the lowest in terms of residential development, has
slightly less commercial development, and similar industrial development anticipated to the other
two scenarios. Figure 4 shows the 2030 Comprehensive Plan land use.
Table 1: Summary of 2005 and 2020 AUAR Scenarios
Land Use 2005 AUAR Scenarios
(Old Scenarios)
2020 Scenarios
(Revised Scenarios)
Scenario 1 Revised Scenario 1
Residential (units) 2,237 4,888
Commercial (sf) 2,985,733 5,084,819
Industrial (sf) 11,175,035 12,817,289
Scenario 2 Revised Scenario 2
Residential (units) 5,715 7,403
Commercial (sf) 5,617,890 5,306,914
Industrial (sf) 9,570,045 10,053,499
Scenario 3 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Residential (units) 8,659 2,455
Commercial (sf) 4,141,554 3,228,667
Industrial (sf) 5,829,722 10,128,296
Development timing is dependent on market conditions and is anticipated to continue over the next 5-
40 years. Some development has occurred within the study area as shown in Figure 5.
Planned Infrastructure
Development in the study area will require infrastructure improvements. The analysis for the
stormwater, water, wastewater, and traffic have been updated as part of this AUAR Update to
evaluate the revised scenarios. These analyses are included in the appendices.
Stormwater: The stormwater analysis was updated based on the revised development
scenarios. Additionally, rules and regulations have changed over the years regarding stormwater
management in the study area since the original AUAR was completed. Stormwater will be
required to be managed based on local, regional, and state water resource rules. The updated
analysis indicates that runoff volumes will be reduced by approximately 70% compared to existing
conditions based on implementation of stormwater management controls. This will also reduce
downstream pollutant loading. Appendix B contains the stormwater management analysis.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 3
Water: The projected water demands for the revised scenarios have remained within the
parameters discussed in the original AUAR. These scenarios are anticipated to increase the
annual water use above the current authorized appropriated volume for the City, similarly as
anticipated in the original AUAR. The mitigation measures for water appropriation and use have
been reviewed and minor revisions were made. Appendix C contains the water appropriation
analysis.
Wastewater: Wastewater within the study area would be conveyed with existing and future
sanitary sewer and then directed to two Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
interceptors. Wastewater is then conveyed through the regional collection system to the
Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant. The revised analysis projects less wastewater flow
than anticipated in the original AUAR. The mitigation measures have been revised and no
changes were needed with this Update. Appendix D contains the wastewater management
analysis.
Traffic: The traffic analysis was updated based on the revised scenarios. This incorporated the
current existing conditions and projected 2040 conditions. The analysis shows that future traffic
generated with the revised development scenarios will be less than those assumed in the original
AUAR. No changes to the mitigation measures are needed. Appendix E contains the traffic
analysis.
Approved Development within the Study Area
Since the 2015 AUAR Update, some anticipated development did not occur, and some projects were
constructed within the study area. Figure 5 shows the areas that have developed in the study area.
Since the 2015 Update, the following has occurred in the study area:
• Watermark: Phase 1 for Watermark (formerly planned as the Hardwood Creek Site) is under
development. The full plan includes a total of 864 residential units (692 single family and 172
townhomes).
• Distribution Alternatives: A 402,000 SF distribution facility was completed in 2016.
• 21st Avenue: A ½ mile extension of 21st Avenue was completed in 2016.
• Eastside Villas: A 32 lot single-family subdivision is under construction.
• Main Street Shoppes: A 9,000 SF multi-tenant commercial building was completed.
• Moon Marsh and Main Street Villages that were noted in previous updates were not
constructed and their permits expired.
AUAR Mitigation Plan
The mitigation plan that has been developed as part of the AUAR process has been revised with his
Update. It is included in Appendix H.
7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after
development:
The original AUAR sites the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). This data is
applicable today. Some areas as shown in Figure 5 have developed. The land cover continues to be
consistent with the original AUAR with planted or cultivated areas, urban areas, wooded and shrub
areas, and wetlands.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 4
The Conservation Design Framework outlined in the AUAR has continued to be carried forward in the
mitigation plan. This framework outlines open space and corridor space where some areas would be
preserved, and some areas would be reviewed for development that could be inclusive to open
space.
8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals,
certifications, and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits,
governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including
bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing, and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are
prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules,
Chapter 4410.3100.
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
Federal
Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be Applied for
State
Minnesota Environmental Quality
Board Environmental Assessment (AUAR) In progress
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Water Quality Certificate To be Applied for
NPDES/SDS General Permit To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be Applied for
State Historic Preservation Office Cultural Resources Review To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Use of or Work within MnDOT right of way To be Applied for
Drainage Permit To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources
Water Appropriations Permit To be Applied for
Preliminary Well Construction
Assessment
To be Applied for
Public Waters Work Permit To be Applied for
General Permit 97-0005 for Temporary
Water Appropriations (need if more than
10,000 gpd of water is appropriated
To be applied for, if
necessary
Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Approval To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
Approval
To be Applied for
Well Location and Construction Approval To be Applied for
Regional
Rice Creek Watershed District Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Approval
To be Applied for
Stormwater Management Plan Approval To be Applied for
Wetland Delineation Boundary
Confirmation
To be approved
upon completion of
wetland delineation
Certificate of Wetland Exemption To be Applied for
Wetland Impact/Replacement Application
To be approved
upon completion of
wetland delineation
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 5
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
Metropolitan Council Sanitary Sewer Service Connection
Approval
To be Applied for
County
Anoka County County Roadway Access Permits To be Applied for
Local
City of Lino Lakes Site Plan Approval To be Applied for
AUAR and Mitigation Plan Approval Ongoing
Planned Unit Development Approval To be Applied for
Preliminary Plat Approval To be Applied for
Final Plat (multiple) Approval To be Applied for
Grading, Excavation and Foundation
Permits (multiple)
To be Applied for
Building Permits (multiple) To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit
(multiple)
To be Applied for
Municipal Water Connection Permit
(multiple)
To be Applied for
Use Permit – Floodplain District To be Applied for
City Roadway Access/Crossing Permits To be Applied for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) To be Applied for
9. Land use:
No significant changes to the original AUAR are noted for this section. The surrounding land uses are
residential, highway, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and open space. The scenarios are
consistent with development that has occurred in the area and compatible with adjacent land uses.
10. Geology, soils, and topography/land forms:
The soils and geology of the study area have not changed from the original AUAR. The area is within
the Anoka Sandplain and has a flat topography. The Anoka County Soil Survey shows numerous
types of soils in the study area including loamy fine sands, fine sandy loams, and hydric soils in
wetland areas.
11. Water Resources:
a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below.
i. Surface water – lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial
ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake,
wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource
value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the
current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include
DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any.
Surface water in the study are remains the same as the original AUAR and includes
numerous wetlands and water bodies. Of note continues to be Peltier Lake (#2000400),
Rondeau Lake (#2001500), Clearwater Creek (#82006a), and Hardwood Creek (#0213a).
Based on a review of information from the MPCA, impaired waters in the study area include:
• Peltier Lake
• Clearwater Creek
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 6
• Hardwood Creek
Additional information can be found in Appendix B which contains an updated analysis of
stormwater management for the study area.
ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project
is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby
wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known
on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this.
As indicated in the original AUAR, the study area has shallow groundwater. Additional
information about groundwater can be found in Appendix C.
b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or
mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below.
i. Wastewater – For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and
composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater
produced or treated at the site.
1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify
any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added
water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of,
municipal wastewater infrastructure.
2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems
(SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site
conditions for such a system.
3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater
treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent
limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater
from wastewater discharges.
Updated analysis on the wastewater system can be found in Appendix D.
ii. Stormwater – Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site
prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for
runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate
receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges.
Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and
permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat
stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or
stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project
construction.
Updated analysis on the stormwater impacts system can be found in Appendix B.
iii. Water appropriation – Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or
groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use,
and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required.
Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water
supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or
required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental
effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources
available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate
environmental effects from the water appropriation.
Updated analysis on water system impacts can be found in Appendix C.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 7
iv. Surface Waters
a) Wetlands – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland
features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and
vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from
physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any
proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify
measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize,
or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required
compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in
the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations.
b) Other surface waters – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations
to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels,
county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation,
dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and
riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from
physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize,
or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water
Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize
turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss
how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water
body, including current and projected watercraft usage.
Impacts to wetlands and surface waters include potential impacts associated with
filling or draining as development occurs. These impacts were contemplated in the
original AUAR. Estimates of wetland impact for the study area are difficult to
anticipate without specific site plans. However, these impacts are anticipated to be
typical of development and are subject to local, state, and federal wetland rules
through the Rice Creek Watershed District, Wetland Conservation Act, US Corps of
Engineers, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency. Hardwood Creek and Peltier Lake are impaired waters. Impacts will
need to meet the sequencing requirements or water quality regulations and wetland
replacement and/or treatment may be needed. Replacement could occur on-site or
through the purchase of wetland banking credits. No significant difference in analysis
from the original AUAR is needed for this Update.
12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes:
a. Pre-project site conditions – Describe existing contamination or potential environmental
hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water
contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks,
and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from
pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction
and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from
existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a
Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan.
No significant changes to existing conditions in relation to existing contamination or hazards have
occurred based on a review of “What’s In My Neighborhood.” A summary of the review is
included in Appendix G.
b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes – Describe solid wastes
generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of
disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and
disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the
generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 8
There are no changes from the original AUAR in terms of solid waste assumptions.
c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials – Describe chemicals/hazardous
materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including
method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground
tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from
accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or
mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including
source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan.
As indicated in the original AUAR, there is the potential for location gas stations to be included as
development occurs with the appropriate land use and zoning per scenario. A gas station or
convenience store would have underground storage tanks. There may also be light industrial
development that includes storage of diesel fuel for operations. These types of developments
would be required to meet all other state and federal permitting and guidance for operations.
d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes – Describe hazardous wastes
generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of
disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling,
storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects
from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling.
Generation of significant amounts of hazardous wastes are not anticipated with development of
either of the scenarios. Waste generated will be of similar nature to residential, light industrial,
and commercial uses and will be required to comply with applicable state laws.
13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features):
a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site.
b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern)
species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity
Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site.
Provide the license agreement number (LA-____) and/or correspondence number (ERDB-
20200206) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the
DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the
site and describe the results.
c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may
be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive
species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known
threatened and endangered species.
d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish,
wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources.
Information from the DNR Natural Heritage Information Database was obtained for the AUAR
Update. This information is similar to the information obtained in the previous updates and the
original AUAR. The mitigation plan contains measures that acknowledge the natural resource
features in the area. The DNR NHIS information is included in Appendix F.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 9
14. Historic properties:
Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on
or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and
3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and
operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects
to historic properties.
The State Historic Preservation Office was contacted regarding historic resources in the area. The
resources are similar to past updates (Appendix F). The City has a robust review for cultural
resources when development is proposed, and the mitigation plan is adequate to address this issue.
15. Visual:
Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related
visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual
effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects.
No changes from previous AUARs.
16. Air:
a. Stationary source emissions – Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of
any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any
hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to
air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory
criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project’s effect on air
quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other
measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary
source emissions.
Not applicable to an AUAR.
b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions.
Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures
(e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to
minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions.
An updated traffic study is included in Appendix E. The traffic generation is within the parameters
of the original AUAR.
c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of
dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may
be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the
project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will
be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors.
No changes from the original AUAR.
17. Noise:
Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated
during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the
project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3)
conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be
taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise.
No changes from the original AUAR.
I-35E Corridor AUAR Update
April 15, 2020
Page 10
18. Transportation
a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing
and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated,
3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate
source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or
other alternative transportation modes.
b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic
improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional
transportation system.
If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds
2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and
procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access
Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local
guidance.
c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation
effects.
An updated traffic study is included in Appendix E.
19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are
addressed under the applicable EAW Items)
NA to AUAR
20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental
effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment
will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects.
No additional environmental effects have been identified.
Appendix A
Figures
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX CENTERVILLE RDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMAN LAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAU LAKE
RICE CREEK CHAIN OFLAKES PARK RESERVE
CITYHALLPARK
CLEARWATER CREEK PARK
PHEASANTHILLS PARK
BRANDYWOODPARK
LAURIELAMOTTEMEMORIAL PARK
TRACIE MCBRIDEMEMORIAL PARK
ACORNCREEKPARK
EAGLE PARK
HIDDENSPRING PARK
CORNERSTONEPARK
ROYALMEADOWSPARK
Study Area
City Boundary
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 1 - Project Location
I-35 Corridor AUAR Project
Lino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Figure1_ProjectLocation.mxd Date Saved: 12/17/2019 8:51:15 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX CENTERVILLERDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMANLAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAULAKE
Study Area
City Boundary
Full Build Land Use
Per manent Rural
Low Density R esidential
Low Density M ixedResidential
Medium D ensityResidential
High D ensity Residential
Planned Residential /Commercial
Office Residential
Commercial
Business Campus
Industrial
Civic/Institutional
Par k & Open Space
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 2 - Revised Scenario 1Draft 2040 Full Build Out Land UseI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Figure2_RevisedScenario12040FullBuild.mxd Date Saved: 4/15/2020 11:53:32 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX CENTERVILLE RDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMAN LAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAU LAKE
Study Area
City Boundary
Scenario 2 Full Build Land Use
Per manent Rural
Low Density R esidential
Low Density M ixedResidential
Medium D ensityResidential
High D ensity Residential
Planned Residential /Commercial
Commercial
Business Campus
Industrial
Civic/Institutional
Par k & Open Space
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 3 - Revised Scenario 2
I-35 Corridor AUAR Project
Lino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Figure3_RevisedScenario2.mxd Date Saved: 12/30/2019 7:01:10 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX CENTERVILLERDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMANLAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAULAKE
Study Area
City Boundary
2030 Land Use
Permanent Rural
Urban Reserve
Low Density Residential
Medium DensityResidential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Mixed Use
Business Campus
Industrial
Civic/Institutional
Park & Open Space
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 4 - 2030 Comp PlanI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Figure4_2030CompPlanMap.mxd Date Saved: 4/1/2020 2:51:16 PM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX
Watermark
Park-n-Ride
Two Industrial Projects
in Centerville
21st Ave
Extension
North
Pointe
Eastside Villas
Distribution
Alternatives
Main Street Shoppes
2nd Addition
McDonalds
Interchange
CENTERVILLE RDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMAN LAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAU LAKE
RICE CREEK CHAIN OFLAKES PARK RESERVE
CITYHALLPARK
CLEARWATER CREEK PARK
PHEASANTHILLS PARK
BRANDYWOODPARK
LAURIELAMOTTEMEMORIAL PARK
TRACIE MCBRIDEMEMORIAL PARK
ACORNCREEKPARK
EAGLE PARK
HIDDENSPRING PARK
CORNERSTONEPARK
ROYAL MEADOWS PARK
Study Area
City Boundary
2020 Update
2015 Update
2010 Update
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 5 - Developments Map
I-35 Corridor AUAR Project
Lino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR\Figure4_DevelopmentsMap.mxd Date Saved: 1/29/2020 9:42:40 AM1 inch = 2,700 feet
Appendix B
Stormwater Management Memo
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Final Technical Memorandum
To: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Madison Rogers, WSB
Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: April 8, 2020
Re: Stormwater Management – I-35 Corridor AUAR
City of Lino Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. R-015144-000
INTRODUCTION
The original Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was completed and approved in
September 2005. The AUAR analyzed the stormwater impacts of the three development
scenarios. Based on the analysis, a Mitigation Plan was developed.
AUAR updates are required every five years from the original date of the approved AUAR.
Updates were prepared in 2010 and 2015. Each assumed no change in the proposed
development land use scenarios and included discussion of mitigation improvements that had
been completed at the time. Since the 2015 AUAR update was prepared, the City has completed
an updated Comprehensive Plan. This AUAR Update includes review of three revised scenarios.
The information and analysis outlined within this memo is intended to complete a portion of the
AUAR Update related to Item # 11.ii – Water Resources – Stormwater related to revising of the
three revised scenarios. This memo is intended to update the stormwater analysis provided in the
original AUAR where applicable.
WATER RESOURCES – STORMWATER
ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to
and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the
site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss
any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution
prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP
site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control,
sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after
project construction.
Procedures and Methods Followed
The procedures and methods used to estimate the runoff volumes and pollutants loads within the
AUAR were based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) runoff curve number
method and event mean concentration pollutant values from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.
Any development within the study area will be required to meet the stormwater standards of the
City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). These standards include:
• Promote volume control and groundwater recharge.
• Protect water quality from nutrients, heavy metals, and other urban pollutants.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 2
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx
• Protect life, public and private property, and the natural resources from damage resulting
from runoff and the dangers associated with flooding.
Existing Conditions
The study area currently consists of agricultural area, rural residential, and park and open space
areas. The impervious surface is primarily made up of the existing roadways. The major roads
include 20th Avenue, 80th Street, County Road 14, and Interstates 35E and 35W.
There are four major watersheds within the study area. The west and central portion of the study
area is part of the Peltier subwatershed. The north part of the study area is within the Hardwood
Creek subwatershed and Upper Rice Creek subwatershed, and the southeast part is within the
Clearwater Creek subwatershed. All of these subwatersheds drain to Peltier Lake through tile
drain or county ditch systems.
Future development will need to address any requirements that are established due to current
regulatory standards adopted by the RCWD, City of Lino Lakes, and Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA).
The MPCA has listed three water resources within the study area as impaired: Peltier Lake,
Hardwood Creek, and Clearwater Creek. Peltier Lake and Hardwood Creek have approved Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) that provides additional guidance and requirements for pollutant
loads.
Approximately 68% of the study area consists of Group D soils, and the remaining area consists
of Group A and B soils. These soil ratings are based on hydrologic soil classifications with A soils
having high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. The infiltration rates for A soils range
from 0.8 to 1.63 inches per hour (Minnesota Stormwater Manual). These soils consist chiefly of
deep, well drained to excessively drained sands and gravel. Group A soils have a high rate of
water transmission, therefore resulting in a low runoff potential. Group B soils have moderate
infiltration rates ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 inches per hour when thoroughly wetted. Group B soils
consist of deep moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse
textures. Infiltration is very low in areas with Group D soils, and the design of infiltration basins is
not recommended in areas with Group D soils (per the MPCA National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System Construction General Permit).
Proposed Conditions
The three revised scenarios were considered in this analysis in the proposed conditions. Due to
the conceptual nature of the development scenarios, the Land Use type classifications for each
scenario were evaluated using curve numbers from the NRCS. The existing conditions and three
proposed revised land use scenarios were evaluated. Stormwater management for any scenario
can be provided through a combination of wet detention ponds and infiltration and filtration
features. Achieving volume reduction and pollutant reduction through the use of infiltration may
be challenging for a majority of the study area due to a majority D soils with low infiltration rates,
and a high groundwater table. Stormwater management via green infrastructure such as
stormwater reuse will be encouraged by the City of Lino Lakes and RCWD to achieve volume
reduction and pollutant removal requirements.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 3
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx
Local Stormwater Management Requirements
Stormwater management within the future development of the study area must be in
conformance with local requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, RCWD, and MPCA. Some
requirements are more stringent than others. However, the development in the study area will
need to demonstrate that all local standards are being met under proposed stormwater
management techniques. The following is a summary of major stormwater management
requirements:
• Rice Creek Watershed District
The RCWD rules (approved December 14, 2016) require that for rate control, proposed
peak runoff rates shall not exceed existing for the 2, 10, 100-year 24-hour rainfall events.
Proposed projects must not adversely affect off-site water levels or resources supported
by local recharge, or increase potential for off-site flooding, during or after construction.
The RCWD requires a water quality treatment volume depending on the area of new or
reconstructed impervious surface. Applicants can use BMPs including infiltration, water
reuse, filtration, and stormwater ponds to achieve the required water quality treatment
volume. Each BMP design variation has a different pollutant removal factor, and
applicants must provide sufficient treatment volume depending on the BMP used for the
site. The RCWD has an approved Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan
(CSMP) for a portion of the AUAR area (Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area CSMP).
This purpose of the CSMP is to present an alternative means to meet the RCWD rules.
Projects within the CSMP area must conform to design requirements detailed in the
CSMP report as applicable.
• City of Lino Lakes
The City’s Stormwater, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance (adopted October 26,
2015) requires proposed development to maintain or decrease runoff volume and flow
frequency, duration and peak runoff rates. Proposed development must also increase
infiltration or filtration opportunities, maintain existing flow patterns, and provide storage
of stormwater runoff on site. Stormwater BMPs must provide infiltration where feasible,
but if infiltration is shown as not feasible for a site due to physical or contamination
limitations, then another stormwater BMP may be used. Water discharged to BMPs shall
be pretreated to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards.
• National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Standards
The MPCA is responsible for implementing NPDES standards. The NPDES requirements
in the AUAR area will be from the NPDES Construction General Permit (effective August
1, 2018) and the NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
(effective August 1, 2013).
The NPDES Construction General Permit will require that for sites replacing pervious
surfaces with one acre or more of impervious surface, a water quality volume equivalent
to 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surface should be treated. This can be met
through wet sedimentation basins, infiltration/filtration, or regional ponding. There are
three impaired waterbodies within the study area, and sites that are within one mile of
impaired water bodies require additional BMPs.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 4
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx
The NPDES MS4 permit requires permittees to provide post-construction water quality
standards adopted at the local level. The NPDES MS4 Permit is currently drafted and out
for public review (available for comment through January 11, 2020). The MS4 permit will
require permittees to meet the requirements of future TMDLs. Currently there is a TMDL
Implementation Plan proposed for discharges to Peltier Lake and Hardwood Creek, they
are identified as the Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL and the Hardwood Creek
Impaired Biota (Fish) and Dissolved Oxygen TMDL. Depending on the location and
proximity to impaired waters, development within the AUAR area may need to complete
an anti-degradation analysis for the impaired water.
Water Quantity and Quality Analysis
A water quantity and quality analysis was completed for the existing and proposed conditions
within the study area. This quantitative analysis uses the NRCS runoff curve number method to
calculate runoff and the results are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1 summarizes the total runoff volumes for each development scenario compared to the
existing condition.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Annual Runoff Volumes1
Existing
conditions
(AC-FT)
2020
Scenario
1 w/o
Volume
Reduction
(AC-FT)
2020
Scenario 1
with
Volume
Reduction2
(AC-FT)
2020
Scenario
2 w/o
Volume
Reduction
(AC-FT)
2020
Scenario 2
with
Volume
Reduction2
(AC-FT)
2020
Comp
Plan
(2030) w/o
Volume
Reduction
(AC-FT)
2020
Comp Plan
(2030) with
Volume
Reduction2
(AC-FT)
AUAR
Area 11,201 11,363 3,326 11,381 3,328 11,383 4,678
1Annual runoff volumes are based on an average of 32 inches of rainfall for the state of
Minnesota.
21.1 inches represents approximately 90% of all rain events in Minnesota (Minnesota Minimal
Impact Design Standards, MPCA), therefore volume reduction of 90% was assumed in all
land use areas for proposed scenarios, except Permanent Rural, Urban Reserve and Right-of
Way, which are assumed to not require any future stormwater management.
Table 2 summarizes the total pollutant loads for each development scenario compared to the
existing condition.
Table 2. Total Suspended Solids and Total Phosphorus Annual Loads
Pollutant1 Existing
conditions
2020
Scenario
1 w/o
Volume
Reduction
2020
Scenario
1 with
Volume
Reduction
2020
Scenario
2 w/o
Volume
Reduction
2020
Scenario
2 with
Volume
Reduction
2020
Scenario
2 w/o
Volume
Reduction
2020
Scenario
2 with
Volume
Reduction
AUAR
Area
TSS
(tons/yr) 906 946 299 957 301 925 372
TP
(lbs/yr) 8,522 8,407 3,059 8,573 3,076 8,344 4,679
1Pollutant loading was determined using Event Mean Concentration values from the MPCA Stormwater
Manual, based on Land Use classification for the AUAR area.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 5
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx
To achieve compliance with regulatory requirements, future development must provide annual
volume and pollutant load reductions in the amounts required by Local Stormwater Management
Regulations and comply with the TMDL. The values presented in Tables 1 and 2 show the
estimated annual volume and pollutant load reductions based on the conceptual analysis, and
don’t include any site-specific constraints for individual developments within the AUAR area.
Potential Impact to Downstream Receiving Waters
The analysis within the AUAR area shows that the runoff volumes will be reduced by
approximately 70 percent for each of the three revised land use scenarios as compared to
existing conditions. This is achieved through implementing City of Lino Lakes, RCWD, and
NPDES volume reduction requirements. This reduction in runoff translates directly to the
reduction in pollutant loads shown in Table 2.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 6
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Stormwater\MEMO - 040920 - Stormwater AP.docx
Review and Update of the Mitigation Plan
The table below provides the mitigation plan for stormwater management. These mitigation measures have been reviewed and revised as needed for this
AUAR Update.
Table 3. Water Quantity and Quality Mitigation Plan
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
17.3 Require stormwater management systems to be developed in accordance with the current
version of the Rice Creek Watershed District Rules (these rules assist in achieving the
goals of the Resource Management Plan – 3) and all other local, state, and federal
stormwater management requirements.
Updated to be inclusive of the current version of the
rules.
The RCWD rules are intended to meet the goals of
the Resource Management Plan-3 that was
included in the 2010 AUAR Update.
Appendix C
Water Appropriation Memo
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Final Technical Memorandum
To: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Jon Christensen, WSB
Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: April 8, 2020
Re: Water Appropriations – I-35 Corridor AUAR
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
WSB Project No. R-015144-000
INTRODUCTION
The original Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was completed and approved in
September 2005. The AUAR analyzed the stormwater impacts of the three development
scenarios. Based on the analysis, a Mitigation Plan was developed.
AUAR updates are required every five years from the original date of the approved AUAR.
Updates were prepared in 2010 and 2015. Each assumed no change in the proposed
development land use scenarios and included discussion of mitigation improvements that had
been completed at the time. Since the 2015 AUAR update was prepared, the City has completed
an updated Comprehensive Plan. This AUAR Update includes review of three scenarios.
The information and analysis outlined within this memo is intended to complete a portion of the
AUAR Update related to Item # 11.b.iii – Water Resources – Water Appropriation related to
revising of the three scenarios. This memo is intended to update the water analysis provided in
the original AUAR where applicable.
WATER RESOURCES – WATER APPROPRIATIONS
11.b.iii - Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or
groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of
the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well
abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as
a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of municipal water infrastructure.
Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water
resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate
environmental effects from the water appropriation.
Existing Conditions
Currently, the majority of the study area is served by private wells. The Minnesota Well Index
indicates there are approximately 90 wells within the study area which are nearly all for domestic
use. No information is available regarding these private wells beyond the Minnesota Well Index.
The municipal water supply system has a DNR water appropriation permit. The water distribution
system exists in the southern portion of the study area and currently extends north of Main Street
on either side of I-35E. The system will continue to be extended as development progresses.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 2
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
The southern portion of the study area overlaps with a moderate vulnerability portion of the City of
Lino Lakes Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) that is delineated in the City’s
Wellhead Protection Plan.
The geology of the City’s existing wells is consistent with other communities in the Twin Cities
Metro Area. The Paleozoic sedimentary rocks around the Twin Cities Metro area have three
primary aquifers (in descending order): Prairie du Chien–Jordan, Tunnel City-Wonewoc (formerly
the Franconian-Ironton-Galesville (FIG)), and Mt. Simon-Hinckley. Each of these are separated
by a confining layer that essentially separates the aquifers.
The Prairie du Chien–Jordan aquifer is the highest yielding aquifer in the Metro Area. Although
these two formations have different names and are geologically different, the two units have been
shown to be hydraulically connected. All of the City’s existing production wells are located in the
Prairie du Chien–Jordan aquifer, and all future wells are anticipated to be as well.
Existing and future water demands for the entire City are detailed in the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Water Supply Plan (Plan). Future infrastructure needs for the City, encompassing
the AUAR study area, were developed in the Plan. A future well field was preliminarily located
within the study area.
The water system currently has six wells and two water towers. Tower No. 3 is currently under
construction, and Well No. 7 is under investigation. Well capacities range from 600 gallons per
minute (gpm) to 1,800 gpm. The existing system firm capacity (with the largest well out of service)
is 4,350 gpm.
From 2014-2018, the City averaged a total water demand of 79 gallons per capita per day and a
maximum day to average day ratio (peaking factor) of 2.8. For the existing population served of
approximately 18,000, this results in an average day demand of 1.42 million gallons per day
(MGD) and a maximum day demand of 3.98 MGD.
Proposed Conditions
Three possible development scenarios were considered. These were revised from the 2005
Original AUAR. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan corresponds to revised Scenario 1. Scenario 2
has also been revised. The third scenario considered is the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Scenario.
Based on the planned land uses for each scenario, the projected water demand is summarized
below. New development within the study area will connect to the municipal water system.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 3
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
2020 Scenario 1
The projected water demands within the study area for 2020 Scenario 1 are shown in Table 1.
There are a number of properties within the southern portion of the study area that already
receive municipal water, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Projected Water Demand for 2020 Scenario 1
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Demand
Assumption
(gpd/acre) *
Average Day
Demand
(gpd)
Max Day
Demand
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 282.6 2.3 449 126,752 354,906
Low Density Mixed Residential 376.9 3.5 683 257,234 720,257
Medium Density Residential 180.5*** 5.0 975 175,968 492,710
High Density Residential 39.0 7.0 1,365 53,257 149,119
Planned Residential / Commercial** 89.9 9.0 1,378 123,902 346,926
Office Residential** 139.5 5.0 988 137,747 385,692
Mixed Use 0.0 2.3 449 0 0
Commercial 348.9*** N/A 1,000 348,907 976,940
Business Campus**** 624.0 N/A 1,000 623,978 2,047,138
Industrial 472.4*** N/A 1,000 472,434 1,322,815
Civic/Institutional 1.0 N/A 750 775 2,169
Urban Reserve 0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 358.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 837.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 3.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.1 N/A N/A 2,320,954 6,798,672
*Based on residential per capita water use of 62.5 gallons per capita per day (historical average from 2014-2018)
and 3.12 persons per household (projected 2020 household size per Comp Plan).
**Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
***Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that already receive municipal water have been
removed.
****Includes contingency for higher intensity max day water demands.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 4
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
2020 Scenario 2
The projected water demands within the study area for Scenario 2 are shown in Table 2. There
are a number of properties within the southern portion of the study area that already receive
municipal water, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Projected Water Demand for 2020 Scenario 2
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Demand
Assumption
(gpd/acre) *
Average Day
Demand
(gpd)
Max Day
Demand
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 173.2 2.3 449 77,698 217,555
Low Density Mixed Residential 376.9 3.5 683 257,234 720,257
Medium Density Residential 240.9*** 5.0 975 234,853 657,588
High Density Residential 391.1 7.0 1,365 533,908 1,494,942
Planned Residential / Commercial** 89.9 9.0 1,378 123,902 346,926
Office Residential** 0.0 5.0 988 0 0
Mixed Use 0.0 2.3 449 0 0
Commercial 348.9*** N/A 1,000 348,907 976,940
Business Campus**** 362.6 N/A 1,000 362,561 1,315,171
Industrial 480.3*** N/A 1,000 480,285 1,344,797
Civic/Institutional 90.9 N/A 750 68,195 190,947
Urban Reserve 0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 358.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 837.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 3.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.1 N/A N/A 2,487,544 7,265,123
*Based on residential per capita water use of 62.5 gallons per capita per day (historical average from 2014-2018)
and 3.12 persons per household (projected 2020 household size per Comp Plan).
**Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
***Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that already receive municipal water have been
removed.
****Includes contingency for higher intensity max day water demands.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 5
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
2030 Comprehensive Plan Scenario
The projected water demands within the study area for the 2030 Comp Plan Scenario are shown
in Table 3. There are a number of properties within the southern portion of the study area that
already receive municipal water, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in
Table 3.
Table 3. Projected Water Demand for 2030 Comp Plan Scenario
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Demand
Assumption
(gpd/acre) *
Average Day
Demand
(gpd)
Max Day
Demand
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 47.1 2.3 449 21,124 59,148
Low Density Mixed Residential 0.0 3.5 683 0 0
Medium Density Residential 140.6*** 5.0 975 137,068 383,791
High Density Residential 39.0 7.0 1,365 53,253 149,107
Planned Residential / Commercial** 0.0 9.0 1,378 0 0
Office Residential** 0.0 5.0 988 0 0
Mixed Use 374.0 2.3 449 167,739 469,669
Commercial 293.0*** N/A 1,000 292,962 820,293
Business Campus**** 276.8 N/A 1,000 276,826 1,075,113
Industrial 572.9*** N/A 1,000 572,888 1,604,086
Civic/Institutional 1.0 N/A 750 775 2,169
Urban Reserve 820.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 361.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 824.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 4.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.2 N/A N/A 1,522,635 4,563,377
*Based on residential per capita water use of 62.5 gallons per capita per day (historical average from 2014-2018)
and 3.12 persons per household (projected 2020 household size per Comp Plan).
**Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
***Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that already receive municipal water have been
removed.
****Includes contingency for higher intensity max day water demands.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 6
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
All three scenarios will trigger the need for additional municipal water supply infrastructure. The
additional wells and storage needed are summarized in Table 4. The storage needs assume that
Water Tower No. 3 (1.5 MG) will be constructed and in use by the time of development.
Table 4. Supply and Storage Summary
Existing
System
With
Scenario 1
With
Scenario 2
With 2030
Comp Plan
Average Day Demand (MGD) 1.42 3.74 3.91 2.94
Maximum Day Demand (MGD) 3.98 10.78 11.25 8.54
Additional Wells Required N/A 3 to 4 3 to 4 2
Additional Storage Required (MG) N/A 0 to 0.3 0 to 0.4 N/A
The City’s existing authorized appropriation volume is 900 million gallons per year (MGY), and
the City’s historical water use from 2014-2018 was 470 MGY. All three scenarios are projected to
increase the annual water use beyond 900 MGY. Therefore, the City will likely require an
amendment to its appropriation volume prior to full build out of the study area. The City’s
historical water use shows a decreasing trend in per capita use, which will likely decrease these
projections by the time of development.
Water Demand Projection Comparison
Table 5 summarizes the projected average water demands from the 2005 Original AUAR and this
2020 AUAR Update for the scenarios outlined above.
Table 5. Comparison of Average Water Demand Projections
Scenario 2005 Original
AUAR
2020 AUAR
Update
Scenario 1 1.86 MGD 2.32 MGD
Scenario 2 2.45 MGD 2.49 MGD
Scenario 3 2.61 MGD N/A
2030 Comp Plan N/A 1.52 MGD
The projected water demands have remained within the parameters discussed in the original
AUAR. The expansion and layout of the water supply system will generally conform to the layout
identified in the 2005 Original AUAR. The 2005 Original AUAR identified the need for 1.0 MG of
additional storage, approximately four additional wells, and trunk and lateral watermains. Water
Tower No. 3 (1.5 MG) is currently under construction, and this AUAR Update reiterates the need
for three to four additional wells. Computer modeling completed as part of the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan Update confirmed the adequacy of the planned 16-inch trunk watermain
loop.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 7
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
Review and Update of the Mitigation Plan
The table below provides the mitigation plan for water appropriations. These mitigation measures have been reviewed and revised as
needed for this AUAR Update.
Table 6. Water Use
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
13.1 Monitor water usage and do not permit new development to proceed if it
exceeds the capacity of the water supply and distribution system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.2 Construct the water supply and distribution system in accordance with
Minnesota Department of Health standards and with the goals, policies,
and recommendations set forth in the City’s Comprehensive Water
Supply Plan.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.3 As necessary, amend the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply Plan and
Capital Improvement Plan to be consistent with any future amendments
or updates to the Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions
or alterations to the water system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing. No
updates have been needed to date for the
study area.
13.4 Follow the adopted Wellhead Protection Plans for Lino Lakes and
Centerville. As necessary, amend the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan for
new wells.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.5 Require abandoned private wells to be sealed in compliance with the
Minnesota Department of Health regulations.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.6 Require that the installation of any private individual wells be constructed
and installed in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health
regulations (Minnesota Well Code).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.7 Continue to implement the City’s adopted water conservation policies
which are intended to attenuate peak water demands throughout the City.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.8 Mitigation will be regulated through the City’s development approval and
permitting process. Proposed master development plans, planned unit
development and subdivision applications, plats, and/or site plans must
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 8
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Water.docx
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
address relevant water conservation mitigation measures prior to final
approval by the City. Implementation of mitigation measures will be
assured through developer agreements with the City, which will require a
financial security for land and infrastructure improvements and/or revoke
the right to acquire building permits and/or certificates of occupancy until
all relevant mitigation measures have been addressed.
Appendix D
Wastewater Management Memo
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Final Technical Memorandum
To: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Jon Christensen, WSB
Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: April 8, 2020
Re: Wastewater Management – I-35 Corridor AUAR
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
WSB Project No. R-015144-000
The original Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was completed and approved in
September 2005. The AUAR analyzed the wastewater impacts of the three development
scenarios. Based on the analysis, a Mitigation Plan was developed.
AUAR updates are required every five years from the original date of the approved AUAR.
Updates were prepared in 2010 and 2015. Each assumed no change in the proposed
development land use scenarios and included discussion of mitigation improvements that had
been completed at the time. Since the 2015 AUAR update was prepared, the City has completed
an updated Comprehensive Plan. This AUAR Update includes review of three scenarios.
The information and analysis outlined within this memo is intended to complete a portion of the
AUAR Update related to Item # 11.b.i – Water Resources – Wastewater related to revising of the
three scenarios. This memo is intended to update the wastewater analysis provided in the original
AUAR where applicable.
WATER RESOURCES – WASTEWATER
Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate
the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below.
i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and
composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produc ed or
treated at the site.
1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify
any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added
water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required exp ansion of,
municipal wastewater infrastructure.
2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems
(SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site
conditions for such a system.
3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater
treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent
limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater
from wastewater discharges.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 2
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
Existing Conditions
Within the City of Lino Lakes, there are approximately 5,200 connections to the municipal sanitary
sewer system. Of the 5,200 connections to the public sanitary sewer system, most are single
family residential with some multi-family residential, commercial/ industrial, and institutional
connections. The City has approximately 1,705 properties that are served by on-site septic
systems. Based on Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) meter data from 2014 -
2018, the City’s existing average daily wastewater flow is 1.04 million gallons per day (MGD).
Since the wastewater generated within the City of Lino Lakes is primarily from residential units,
the wastewater characteristics are assumed to be of typical domestic strength. Table 1 is a
summary of the estimated existing wastewater characteristics for Lino Lakes.
Table 1. Estimated Existing Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average
Loading
Parameter Concentration
(mg/L)
Average Load
(lbs/day)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 220 1,909
Total Suspended Solids 220 1,909
Ammonia – Nitrogen 25 217
Total Phosphorous 8 69
Wastewater generated within the City is collected by a series of laterals, trunk sewer mains, and
lift stations and is then directed to one of three interceptor sewers that are owned, operated, and
maintained by MCES (Interceptors 9106, 8361, and 9708). Wastewater is then conveyed through
the MCES regional collection system to the Metropolitan WWTP. The Metropolitan WWTP has a
design capacity of 314 MGD and currently receives an average daily flow of 191 MGD.
Proposed Conditions
Three possible development scenarios were considered. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan
corresponds to revised Scenario 1. Scenario 2 has also been revised. The third scenario
considered is the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Scenario. The projected wastewater flow for each
scenario is based on the planned land uses as described below.
The municipal collection system currently extends to Main Street on either side of I-35E. The
municipal trunk sewers will continue to be extended as development progresses. As detailed in
the 2040 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, development within Sanitary Sewer District 3 and
5 will require at least one large regional lift station and several smaller lift stations.
The majority of the wastewater generated within the study area will discharge to MCES
Interceptor 802325 which is currently stubbed at the City boundary at the intersection of Main
Street and Elmcrest Avenue. The remainder will discharge to MCES Interceptor 7651 which
currently serves the existing Sanitary Sewer District 3. All of the flow generated within the study
area will be conveyed through the MCES regional collection system to the Metropolita n WWTP.
2020 Scenario 1
The proposed development within the study area for revised Scenario 1, the assumed
wastewater flow for each land use type, and the projected wastewater flow for that development
are summarized in Table 2. There are a number of properties within the southern portion of the
study area that are already sewered, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in
Table 2.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 3
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
Table 2. Projected Average Daily Flow for 2020 Scenario 1
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Flow
Assumption
(gpd/acre)
Average
Flow
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 282.6 2.3 414 117,002
Low Density Mixed Residential 376.9 3.5 630 237,447
Medium Density Residential 180.5** 5.0 900 162,432
High Density Residential 39.0 7.0 1,260 49,160
Planned Residential / Commercial* 89.9 9.0 1,210 108,836
Office Residential* 139.5 5.0 850 118,567
Mixed Use 0.0 2.3 414 0
Commercial 348.9** N/A 800 279,126
Business Campus*** 624.0 N/A 800 799,182
Industrial 472.4** N/A 800 377,947
Civic/Institutional 1.0 N/A 600 620
Urban Reserve 0.0 N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 358.1 N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 837.5 N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 3.7 N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.1 N/A N/A 2,250,319
*Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
**Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that are already sewered have been
removed.
***Includes contingency for higher intensity wastewater flow.
Table 3 summarizes the projected wastewater flow by MCES connection point under Scenario 1.
Note that the flows listed in Table 3 include only additional flows generated within the study area.
Table 3. Projected Additional Regional Wastewater Flow by MCES Connection Point for
2020 Scenario 1
MCES
Interceptor
City Sanitary
Sewer District
Average
Flow (MGD)
Peak Hourly
Flow (MGD)
7651 3 0.62 2.11
802325 5 1.63 4.73
Table 4 summarizes the projected wastewater characteristics and additional loading for the
wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 1.
Table 4. Projected Wastewater Characteristics and Additional Total Average Daily
Wastewater Loading for 2020 Scenario 1
Parameter Concentration
(mg/L)
Average Load
(lbs/day)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 220 4,131
Total Suspended Solids 220 4,131
Ammonia –Nitrogen 25 469
Total Phosphorous 8 150
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 4
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
2020 Scenario 2
The proposed development within the study area for Scenario 2, the assumed wastewater flow
for each land use type, and the projected wastewater flow for that development are summarized
in Table 5. There are a number of properties within the southern portion of the study area that are
already sewered, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in Table 5.
Table 5. Projected Average Daily Flow for 2020 Scenario 2
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Flow
Assumption
(gpd/acre)
Average
Flow
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 173.2 2.3 414 71,721
Low Density Mixed Residential 376.9 3.5 630 237,447
Medium Density Residential 240.9** 5.0 900 216,787
High Density Residential 391.1 7.0 1,260 492,838
Planned Residential / Commercial* 89.9 9.0 1,210 108,836
Office Residential* 0.0 5.0 850 0
Mixed Use 0.0 2.3 414 0
Commercial 348.9** N/A 800 279,126
Business Campus*** 362.6 N/A 800 590,049
Industrial 480.3** N/A 800 384,228
Civic/Institutional 90.9 N/A 600 54,556
Urban Reserve 0.0 N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 358.1 N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 837.5 N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 3.7 N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.1 N/A N/A 2,435,589
*Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
**Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that are already sewered have been
removed.
***Includes contingency for higher intensity wastewater flow.
Table 6 summarizes the projected wastewater flow by MCES connection point under Scenario 2.
Note that the flows listed in Table 6 include only those generated within the study area.
Table 6. Projected Regional Wastewater Flow by MCES Connection Point for 2020
Scenario 2
MCES
Interceptor
City Sanitary
Sewer District
Average
Flow (MGD)
Peak Hourly
Flow (MGD)
7651 3 0.64 2.18
802325 5 1.79 5.19
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 5
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
Table 7 summarizes the projected wastewater characteristics and additional loading for the
wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 2.
Table 7. Projected Wastewater Characteristics and Additional Total Average Daily
Wastewater Loading for 2020 Scenario 2
Parameter Concentration
(mg/L)
Average Load
(lbs/day)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 220 4,471
Total Suspended Solids 220 4,471
Ammonia –Nitrogen 25 508
Total Phosphorous 8 163
2030 Comprehensive Plan Scenario
The proposed development within the study area for the 2030 Comp Plan Scenario, the assumed
wastewater flow for each land use type, and the projected wastewater flow for that development
are summarized in Table 8. There are a number of properties within the southern portion of the
study area that are already sewered, so these areas have been removed from the areas listed in
Table 8.
Table 8. Projected Average Daily Flow for 2030 Comp Plan Scenario
Land Use Type Area
(acres)
Density
(units/acre)
Flow
Assumption
(gpd/acre)
Average
Flow
(gpd)
Low Density Sewered Residential 47.1 2.3 414 19,499
Low Density Mixed Residential 0.0 3.5 630 0
Medium Density Residential 140.6** 5.0 900 126,524
High Density Residential 39.0 7.0 1,260 49,156
Planned Residential / Commercial* 0.0 9.0 1,210 0
Office Residential* 0.0 5.0 850 0
Mixed Use 374.0 2.3 414 154,836
Commercial 293.0** N/A 800 234,369
Business Campus*** 276.8 N/A 800 521,461
Industrial 572.9** N/A 800 458,310
Civic/Institutional 1.0 N/A 600 620
Urban Reserve 820.0 N/A N/A N/A
Permanent Rural 361.3 N/A N/A N/A
Park & Open Space 824.4 N/A N/A N/A
Right-of-Way 4.0 N/A N/A N/A
Total 3,754.1 N/A N/A 1,564,776
*Assumes 50% residential and 50% commercial development.
**Areas for properties within the southern portion of the study area that are already sewered have been
removed.
***Includes contingency for higher intensity wastewater flow.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 6
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
Table 9 summarizes the projected wastewater flow by MCES connection point under the 2030
Comp Plan Scenario. Note that the flows listed in Table 9 include only additional flows generated
within the study area.
Table 9. Projected Additional Regional Wastewater Flow by MCES Connection Point for
2030 Comp Plan Scenario
MCES
Interceptor
City Sanitary
Sewer District
Average
Flow (MGD)
Peak Hourly
Flow (MGD)
7651 3 0.52 1.77
802325 5 1.04 3.22
Table 10 summarizes the projected wastewater characteristics and additional loading for the
wastewater that will be generated under the 2030 Comp Plan Scenario.
Table 10. Projected Wastewater Characteristics and Additional Total Average Daily
Wastewater Loading for 2030 Comp Plan Scenario
Parameter Concentration
(mg/L)
Average Load
(lbs/day)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 220 2,873
Total Suspended Solids 220 2,873
Ammonia –Nitrogen 25 326
Total Phosphorous 8 104
Wastewater Projection Comparison
Table 11 summarizes the projected average wastewater flows from the 2005 Original AUAR and
this 2020 AUAR Update for the scenarios outlined above. The 2005 Original AUAR used flow
assumptions of 274 gpd/unit for residential development and 1,500 gpd/acre for commercial and
industrial development. The 2005 flow assumptions were very conservative, so the 2020 flow
assumptions used in this update have been revised to agree more closely with metered
wastewater flows from the last five years.
Table 11. Comparison of Average Wastewater Flow Projections
Scenario 2005 Original
AUAR
2020 AUAR
Update
Scenario 1 2.529 MGD 2.250 MGD
Scenario 2 3.646 MGD 2.436 MGD
Scenario 3 3.733 MGD N/A
2030 Comp Plan N/A 1.565 MGD
The projected wastewater flows have decreased in this update. Due to topography constraints,
the expansion and layout of the sanitary sewer system will generally conform to the layout
identified in the 2005 Original AUAR. However, the exact sizing of trunk facilities may be revised
based on the most current wastewater flow projections.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 7
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Water Wastewater\MEMO - 040820 - Wastewater.docx
Review and Update of the Mitigation Plan
The table below provides the mitigation plan for wastewater management. These mitigation measures have been reviewed and revised as
needed for this AUAR Update.
Table 12. Water Quality: Wastewater
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
18.1 Monitor wastewater flows and not permit new development to proceed if it
exceeds the capacity of the wastewater system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.2 Construct the major infrastructure improvements needed to expand the
capacity of the wastewater system (i.e. lift stations, forcemains, and
upgrades to the existing systems) in accordance with the Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.3 Adequately phase capacity improvements. This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.4 Amend the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement
Plan to be consistent with any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
that would necessitate expansions or alterations to the sanitary sewer
system and regional capacity needs.
This mitigation measure is ongoing. No
updates have been needed to date for the
study area.
18.5 Each proposed development will be required to provide a detailed
projection of wastewater generation and flows. These calculations will be
checked by the City’s Engineering Consultant.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.6 The City will create a year-end report to evaluate wastewater increases by
major sewer lines and overall system usage in relation to capacity. Results
of this assessment will become the targets for growth for the following year.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
Appendix E
Transportation Memo
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Final Technical Memorandum
To: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Chuck Rickart PE, PTOE, WSB
Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: April 8, 2020
Re: Transportation – I-35 Corridor AUAR
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
WSB Project No. R-015144-000
INTRODUCTION
The original Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was completed and approved in
September 2005. The AUAR analyzed the transportation impacts of the three development
scenarios for the years 2030 and post 2030. Based on the analysis, a Mitigation Plan was
developed. Mitigation included adding new roadway connections, intersection control, turn lanes,
and widening roads as necessary as development occurs throughout the area.
AUAR updates are required every five years from the original date of the approved AUAR.
Updates were prepared in 2010 and 2015. Each assumed no change in the proposed
development land use scenarios and included discussion of mitigation improvements that had
been completed at the time. In both cases no additional mitigation was recommended. Since the
2015 AUAR update was prepared, the City has completed an updated Comprehensive Plan
including a Transportation Plan for the 2040 forecast year.
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION UPDATE
There have been several developments in the study area that have been approved since the
original AUAR was completed in 2005 including:
• Park-and-Ride in the northwest quadrant of I-35E and CSAH 14
• McDonald’s restaurant and Main Street Shoppes east of I-35E on CSAH 14
• NorthPointe residential development north of Birch Street between I-35E and CSAH 54
• Watermark residential development west of I-35E, north of CSAH14
• Clearwater Creek commercial development west of I-35E south of CSAH 14 on 21st
Avenue
In addition, there have been roadway improvements completed since the original AUAR
including:
• CSAH 14 Improvements west of I-35E
• I-35E at CSAH 14 Interchange Improvements
As previously discussed, three development scenarios were included in the original AUAR and
Updates. The City has since updated its Comprehensive Plan and reviewed the scenarios. Two
consolidated scenarios are now included in this update and are still consistent with the original
AUAR.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 2
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Traffic Generation
The original AUAR include traffic generation for the three land use scenarios using the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) “Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition.” The traffic generation was
prepared for both the 2030 base year and the Post 2030 conditions. For comparison purposes,
the Post 2030 conditions were used. Tables 1 – 3 shows the Post 2030 Traffic Generation from
the original AUAR.
Table 1. 2005 AUAR Scenario 1 – City Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Rural Land Use DU 125 93 127 1,196
Low Density
Res DU 510 383 516 4,880
Med Density
Res DU 1,129 416 496 6,078
High Density
Res DU 473 241 294 3,178
Commercial SF 2,985,000 5,090 6,773 63,598
Industrial SF 11,175,000 7,912 8,270 68,872
Total 14,135 16,476 147,802
Table 2. 2005 AUAR Scenario 2 – Commercial / Industrial Emphasis
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Rural Land Use DU 44 33 44 422
Low Density
Res DU 118 88 119 1,130
Low/Med
Density Res DU 2,419 1,439 1,060 18,662
Med/High
Density Res DU 2,173 954 1,149 13,150
High Density
Res DU 981 490 596 6,458
Commercial SF 5,617,000 9,577 12,745 119,676
Industrial SF 9,570,000 6,775 7,082 58,980
Total 19,356 22,795 218,478
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 3
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Table 3. 2005 AUAR Scenario 3 – Residential Emphasis
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Rural Land Use DU 43 32 43 412
Low Density
Res DU 118 88 119 1,130
Low/Med
Density Res DU 3,685 2,192 1,614 28,430
Med/High
Density Res DU 3,247 1,425 1,718 19,650
High Density
Res DU 1,566 799 971 10,524
Commercial SF 4,141,000 7,060 9,396 88,228
Industrial SF 5,829,000 4,127 4,313 35,924
Total 15,723 18,174 184,298
For this 2020 AUAR Update, the traffic generation was updated based on the revised
development scenarios. Traffic generation rates from the current ITE Trip Generation Manual
“Trip Generation Manual, 10h Edition” were used to determine the updated traffic forecasts. Table
4, Table 5, and Table 6 show the updated Scenario traffic generation.
Table 4. 2020 AUAR Update Scenario 1 – City 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Low Density
Res DU 2,335 1,728 2,312 22,042
Med Density
Res DU 1,675 687 838 11,089
High Density
Res DU 678 312 380 4,963
Commercial SF 5,085,000 3,865 4,831 67,936
Industrial SF 12,817,000 5,127 4,999 41,014
Total 11,718 13,358 147,044
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 4
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Table 5. 2020 AUAR Update Scenario 2
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Low Density
Res DU 2,283 1,689 2,260 21,552
Med Density
Res DU 1,977 811 989 13,088
High Density
Res DU 3,143 1,446 1,760 23,007
Commercial SF 5,307,000 4,033 5,042 77,270
Industrial SF 10,054,000 4,022 3,921 32,173
Total 12,001 13,971 167,089
Table 6. 2020 AUAR Update Scenario 3 – City 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Unit Size AM Peak PM Peak ADT
Low Density
Res DU 190 140 188 1,794
Med Density
Res DU 1,991 816 996 13,180
High Density
Res DU 273 126 153 1,998
Commercial SF 3,229,000 2,454 3,068 47,014
Industrial SF 10,128,000 4,051 3,950 32,410
Total 7,588 8,354 96,396
Comparing the land use scenarios shows that the future traffic generated with the updated land
uses will be less than that from the original AUAR. The percent reduction in traffic generation is
shown below in Table 7.
Table 7. Scenario Comparison
2006
Scenario
2020
Updated
Scenario
AM Peak
%
Reduction
PM Peak
%
Reduction
ADT %
Reduction
Scenario 1 Scenario 1 21% 23% 1%
Scenario 2 Scenario 2 61% 63% 31%
Scenario 3 Scenario 2 31% 30% 10%
Scenario 1 Scenario 3 86% 97% 53%
Traffic Analysis
The Transportation Study completed as part of the original AUAR analyzed the effects the land
use scenarios had on the local and regional roadway systems. The analysis was based on
existing traffic counts at the time and the Anoka County version of the Metropolitan Council’s
Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 5
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
The Traffic analysis focused on the operation of the primary roadways and their intersections
during the peak travel periods (a.m. and p.m. peak hours), which is typically the time when the
most severe traffic congestion is incurred. The results found that mitigation improvements would
be required for each Scenario for the transportation system to operate at acceptable levels.
Based on the analysis a Mitigation Plan was developed. Mitigation included adding new roadway
connections, intersection control, turn lanes and widening roads as necessary as development
occurs throughout the area. The improvements were intended to represent the minimum level of
infrastructure investment that would be needed to meet acceptable level of service standards.
Additional roadway and non-motorized improvements, beyond the minimum level, may be
identified to accommodate specific development needs.
Updated traffic forecasts were developed for 2040 and Post 2040 with the Cities “Draft 2040
Transportation Plan”. The forecasts assumed a roadway network consistent with the AUAR
mitigation improvements. Figure 1 shows the forecasted 2040 and Post 2040 Average Daily
Traffic volumes with the future roadway network.
Based on the comparison of the forecasted traffic generation from the AUAR area and the
forecasted 2040 traffic volumes, the traffic analysis conducted, and Mitigation Plan recommended
with the 2005 AUAR and the 2010 and 2015 updated AUAR’s remains valid for this AUAR
Update.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 6
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Review and Update of the Mitigation Plan
The table below provides the mitigation plan for Transportation. These mitigation measures have been reviewed and revised as needed for
this AUAR Update.
Table 7. Transportation
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
21.1 Create a monitoring program that closely evaluates traffic impacts from proposed
developments within the AUAR area.
Traffic Impact Studies are required for
proposed developments showing the
impact on the transportation system and
consistency with the AUAR.
21.2 Implement traffic mitigation measures as development occurs within the AUAR
area. Specific mitigation measures for the three development scenarios are
discussed in Item 21 and depicted on Figures 21-8, 21-9, and 21-10. These
mitigation measures improve overall traffic operations for the respective
development scenarios. The improvements are intended to represent the
minimum level of infrastructure investment that would be needed to meet
acceptable level of service standards. Additional roadway and non-motorized
improvements, beyond the minimum level, may be identified to accommodate
specific development needs that are identified within the AUAR area. Primary
improvements, regardless of land use scenario, include:
21.2.1 Develop frontage road system in compliance with local, county and state
access management guidelines to serve local and regional traffic.
21.2.2 Work with appropriate road authorities to reconstruct and provide
additional capacity for CSAH 21.
21.2.3 Work with appropriate road authorities to construct Northerly Bypass
with new interchanges at I-35W and I-35E (80th Street East) to improve traffic
operations and access to and within the AUAR area. As recommended by
FHWA and Mn/DOT, a phasing plan should be established to construct each
piece of the Northerly Connector as it becomes necessary to maintain the
serviceability of the transportation system.
CSAH 14 improvement was completed in
2009 and noted in the 2010 AUAR
Update
CSAH 54 with CSAH 14 (formerly CSAH
21) 20th Avenue North intersection
improvements were completed and
noted in the 2010 AUAR Update.
I-35E Interchange reconstruction was
completed in 2011. This mitigation
measure is complete.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 7
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
Phase Improvement
1. CSAH 14, I-35W to I-35E (funded and programmed for
construction)
2. CSAH 14, I-35E Interchange
3. CR 140 (80th Street)/I-35E Interchange
4. CSAH 14 across Peltier Lake (Northerly
Bypass/Connector)
5. CSAH 14/I-35W Interchange
As part of these improvements, the following steps should be taken as the
opportunity is presented:
Inclusion of the northerly bypass and proposed interchanges in future
transportation and comprehensive plans
Preservation of right of way through official mapping or other process
Right of way dedication through the platting process
21.3
Require a traffic impact analysis for all development projects within the AUAR
area. The traffic impact analysis will assist the City and other road authorities in
determining the appropriate mitigation measures that are required to mitigate
impacts of a specific development proposal.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.4 Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the additional
traffic on the on the regional system, specifically Interstates 35W and 35E, by
reconstructing each to provide a six-lane cross-section consistent with the
recommendations outlined in the I-35 IRC. It should be noted that it was
determined that an expansion will be necessary even without the development
scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates serve a much larger area, the
projected growth of the entire Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by
the year 2030.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.5 Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require
project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses, bicyclists,
and pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 8, 2020
Page 8
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Traffic\MEMO - 040820 - Transportation.docx
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
21.6 Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements (see item #21.2) in
future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Submit the plan
update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT, Met Council, etc.).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.7 Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies related
to traffic nose and noise walls.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.8 Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures such as
appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site
design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential areas.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.9 Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for the
Eagle Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.10 Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site plans
make use of access management practices to promote safe, effective traffic flow.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.11 Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway Department
Development Review Process Manual (updated June 2013).
This mitigation measure is ongoing and
has been updated to reflect the newest
manual.
21.12 Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable
transportation authorities.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
!?
!?
"S
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX 62,00045,80016,00012,30012,10035,000 36,0003,0002,40020,0005,90060,00043,00010,0008,40017,1008,50041,00032,400
11,1006,40014,0005,80010,0004,200 61,00055,1006,500CENTERVILLE RDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
WARDS LAKE
SHERMAN LAKE
CENTERVILLELAKE
GEORGEWATCHLAKE
PELTIER LAKE
RONDEAU LAKE
RICE CREEK CHAIN OFLAKES PARK RESERVE
CITYHALLPARK
CLEARWATER CREEK PARK
PHEASANTHILLS PARK
BRANDYWOODPARK
LAURIELAMOTTEMEMORIAL PARK
TRACIE MCBRIDEMEMORIAL PARK
ACORNCREEKPARK
EAGLE PARK
HIDDENSPRING PARK
CORNERSTONEPARK
ROYALMEADOWSPARK
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 1 - Transportation
I-35 Corridor AUAR Project
Lino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR_Transportation\Figure1_ProjectLocation.mxd Date Saved: 1/21/2020 9:14:58 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
Study Area
City Boundary
Future Roadway
!?Future Interchange
"S Future Overpass
XXX Post 2040 Full Build ADT VolumeXXX 2040 Forecasted ADT Volumes
Appendix F
SHPO and DNR Information
HISTORY/ARCHITECTURE INVENTORYCOUNTY CITYTWP PROPNAME ADDRESS TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTIONQUARTERSUSGS REPORTNUM NRHP CEF DOE INVENTNUMAnokaCentervillehouse 7238 Main St.31 22 14SW-SW Centerville AN-2005-1H AN-CVC-009house 1695 Sorel Rd.31 22 22SW-NW Centerville AN-2005-1H AN-CVC-035Lino LakesBridge 9830 CSAH 14 over I35 W 2.2 miles NE of Junctin TH4931 22 10SE-NW CentervilleAN-LKC-009Bridge 02802 CR 140 over I 35E 1.5 miles S of Junction TH 35W31 22 12NE-NW CentervilleAN-LKC-011
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATIONSCOUNTY SITENUM SITENAME TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTION XQUARTERS ACRES WORKTYPE DESCRIPT TRADITION CONTEXT ReportNum Natreg CEF DOEAnoka21AN000331 22 11C-S-S62EW, ASW-1 Ps-2, SO-2 AN-01-1121AN0037Paul31 22 10SE-NE-NW-SE,SE-NE-SW-NE161ASW-121AN0038Hensel31 22 22NA-NW801,2ASW-1,PL-2MW-1, LW-2,Pl-2 AN-16-1321AN0039Wards Lake31 22 22W-NW-SW262,1ASW-121AN0040Cartier31 22 10SW-SE-SE601ASA-2, W-1AL-2, HR-1, LW-2 AN-02-0321AN004131 22 10N-S-SW251ASW-1 RA-131 22 10SE-NW-SW251ASW-1 RA-131 22 10SW-NE-SW251ASW-1 RA-121AN0049Dupre31 22 14SW-NW-SW211,2ASPL-1,A-1,W-1Pl-1,AL-1,HR-2,SO-1,Ka-2Dupre31 22 14NW-SW-SW211,2ASPL-1,A-1,W-1Pl-1,AL-1,HR-2,SO-1,Ka-221AN0060Peltier Island31 22 11W-SW502ASW-1 MW-1 AN-02-0321AN006731 22 3SW-SE-NE-NW31ASA-121AN0071(overlaps w/21AN72)31 22 14SE-NE-SE-NW11ASW-2 MW-221AN0072(overlaps w/ 21AN71)31 22 14NE-SE-SE-NW11ASW-2 MW-221AN008331 22 2S-NE-SW, N-SE-SW151ASW-121AN008931 22 10C-NE-NW-NW31LSA-221AN009031 22 2C-N-NW-SW61ASW-1Anoka21AN009131 22 2S-NW-NE-NW, N-SW-NE-NW51ASW-1, O-221AN009531 22 2SE-SE; E-NW-NE-NE241ASW-1 LW-131 22 11 241ASW-1 LW-121AN012831 22 22NE-SE-SW-SW0.51LS21AN0132Iverson III31 22 12NE-NE05LS21AN014331 22 14SW-SE-SW2.41AS,LSA-3,W-1 AN-97-0221AN016631 22 22NW-SW-SW-SW11LS21AN0168Paul Farm (east)31 22 10SW-SE191ASW-1 RA-121AN0174Old Willow31 22 1SW-SW-NW-SW0.11LS21ANd31 22 14C-SW 5LS
Appendix G
Contamination Review Memo
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Contamination Review\0 - Contamination Review Memo - AUAR 2020 - text.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes
From: Ryan Spencer, WSB
Andi Moffatt, WSB
Date: January 31, 2020
Re: Desktop Contamination Review – I-35 Corridor AUAR
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
WSB Project No. R-015144-000
INTRODUCTION
WSB reviewed public database information to identify sites that pose a contamination risk to the
Lino Lakes I-35E Corridor located in Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the Project Area). A map showing
the Project Area is included as Figure 1. The following online databases were reviewed on
January 30, 2020 as part of this desktop environmental review:
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) "What's in My Neighborhood?" website
• Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) "What's in My Neighborhood?" website
This desktop contamination review is not intended to replace a Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) performed per ASTM E1527-13. WSB did not verify the database information
for accuracy. Therefore, further environmental review is recommended prior to performing any
follow-up investigation work (e.g. subsurface borings) to verify WIMN source information. Based
on this desktop review, the following information is provided:
Project Area Sites
Thirty-three (33) sites were identified at the Project Area (see Figures 2, 2A, and 2B). The sites
are associated with 50 database listings, summarized below:
• Twenty-one (21) stormwater permit listings (18 construction and 3 industrial);
• Fifteen (15) hazardous waste generator listings. Inclusion on the hazardous waste
generator database indicates the site generates hazardous waste requiring a permit;
• Five (5) listings were for sites with aboveground tanks (AST) and/or underground
tanks (USTs) but do not directly indicate a petroleum spill or release;
• Two (2) air quality permit listings; and
• One (1) site assessment listing. Site Assessment sites are places where
contamination or regulated waste activities have been reported to the MPCA. If it is
determined that little or no exposure potential exists and no further remedial actions
are planned, the site is closed and listed as inactive.
None of the identified Project Area listings indicate a hazardous material spill or release except
for the following six (6) listings:
Michael Grochala
January 31, 2020
Page 2
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Contamination Review\0 - Contamination Review Memo - AUAR 2020 - text.docx
Site 1 – Rehbein Shop/Office, 6805 20th Avenue South, Centerville, MN
• Leak Site LS0015707: The identified leak was discovered in 2003, consisted of diesel,
did not impact groundwater, and was issued site closure by the MPCA in 2006. Site
closure does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
Site 5 – Acton Construction, 2209 Phelps Road, Lino Lakes, MN
• Leak Site LS0001284: The identified leak was discovered in 1989, consisted of fuel oil
#1 & #2 and leaded gasoline, impacted groundwater, and was issued site closure by
the MPCA in 1992. Site closure does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
• Brownfields VP3340: The site entered the Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC)
Program from 1992 to 1997. Brownfields are potentially contaminated sites where the
MPCA is assisting with environmental investigations and/or redevelopment activities.
• Brownfields BF0001207: A second VIC listing associated with Site 5 was listed as
active from June 2019 to December 2019.
Site 25 – Eagle Trucking Inc, 7087 20th Avenue, Centerville, MN
• Leak Site LS0013133: The identified leak was discovered in 1999, consisted of diesel,
and was issued site closure by the MPCA in 2000. Site closure does not mean that
the site is free of contamination.
Site 33 – Lakes 1 Stop, 7090 21st Avenue South, Centerville, MN
• Leak Site LS0013380: The identified leak was discovered in 2000, consisted of
gasoline, and was issued site closure by the MPCA in 2003. Site closure does not
mean that the site is free of contamination.
Adjacent Sites
Ten (10) sites were identified adjacent to the Project Area (see Figures 2, 2A, and 2B). The
sites are associated with 14 listings, summarized below:
• Two (2) construction stormwater listings;
• Two (2) hazardous waste generator listings. Inclusion on the hazardous waste
generator database indicates the site generates hazardous waste requiring a permit;
• Two (2) listings were for sites with USTs but do not directly indicate a petroleum spill
or release; and
• One (1) feedlot listing.
None of the listings identified adjacent to the Project Area indicate a hazardous material spill or
release except for the following seven (7) listings:
Site 8 – Corner Express, 1990 Main Street, Centerville, MN
• Leak Site LS0018115: The identified leak was discovered in 2010, consisted of
unleaded gasoline, impacted groundwater, and was issued site closure by the MPCA
in 2011. Site closure does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
• Leak Site LS0020747: The identified leak was discovered in June 2018, consisted of
gasoline, and was issued site closure by the MPCA in August 2018. Site closure does
not mean that the site is free of contamination.
Site 10 – Jim Stevens Construction, 7007 20th Avenue, Centerville, MN
• Leak Site LS0009694: The identified leak was discovered in 1996, consisted of diesel
and gasoline, impacted groundwater, and was issued site closure by the MPCA in
1998. Site closure does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
Site 20 – Hugo 30 Acres, 4330 170th Street North, Hugo, MN
Michael Grochala
January 31, 2020
Page 3
K:\015144-000\Admin\Docs\AUAR - Update 2020\Contamination Review\0 - Contamination Review Memo - AUAR 2020 - text.docx
• Brownfields PB4670: The site entered the Petroleum Brownfield (PB) Program from
September 2014 to December 2014.
• Brownfields VP31840: A second VIC listing associated with Site 20 was listed as
active from September 2014 to January 2015. Brownfields are potentially
contaminated sites where the MPCA is assisting with environmental investigations
and/or redevelopment activities.
Site 42 – Mcneely Residence, 6687 20th Avenue South, Lino Lakes, MN
• Leak Site LS0015090: The identified leak was discovered in 2003, consisted of fuel oil
#1 and #2, impacted groundwater, and was issued site closure by the MPCA in 2005.
Site closure does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
Site 43 – Lino Lakes Well #4, 6786 Clearwater Creek Drive, Lino Lakes, MN
• Leak Site LS0014107: The identified leak was discovered in 2000 and was issued site
closure by the MPCA in 2003. The type of product released is not known. Site closure
does not mean that the site is free of contamination.
Surrounding Area Sites - Within 500 Feet
Three sites (Sites 21, 36, and 41) were identified in the surrounding area (beyond adjacent) within
500 feet of the Project Area and are associated with four (4) listings. The surrounding area
listings are for stormwater and hazardous waste permits and do not indicate the presence of
contamination.
CONCLUSION
All identified Project Area leaks and VIC listings (Sites 1, 5, 25, and 33) and adjoining leak or
VIC/PB listings (Sites 8, 10, 20, 42, and 43) pose a contamination risk if future redevelopment
involves excavation activities in the vicinity of these sites. Prior to redevelopment in the vicinity of
the identified leak or VIC/PB sites, it is recommended that subsurface environmental
investigations be conducted to determine if contaminated soil and/or groundwater will need to be
managed during redevelopment.
If evidence of contamination or regulated materials are discovered during construction, it is
recommended that WSB’s Environmental Group is contacted immediately to ensure all materials
are managed in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. If you have any questions
or need additional information, please contact me at 763-231-4854 or rspencer@wsbeng.com.
Enclosures:
Figure 1 – Project Location
Figure 2, 2A, and 2B – MPCA/MDA What’s in My Neighborhood Search Results
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WX CENTERVILLERDOTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
Study Area
City Boundary
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 1 - Project LocationContamination ReviewI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR_ContaminationReview\Figure1_ProjectLocation.mxd Date Saved: 1/30/2020 6:23:35 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
!H
!H
#*
!H
")
!H
")
#*
")
")
")
#*
#*!H
!H
!H !H
#*
#*
!H
")
#*
")
!(
#*
")
#*
")
")
")
")
#*#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*!(
!(
!(!(
!H
!(")
#*
")
#*
!H
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
!H
")
")
")
")
#*
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*
#*#*!H
!H
!H #*
#*
!H
#*
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
!H
#*
!(
!(
!(
#*
#*
")
#*
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GnWX
GÀWX
GÀWX
G¦WXCENTERVILLERD OTTERLAKE RDMAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
BIRCH ST
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
25 26
27
28
29
30
31
32 33
34
35 36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Study Area
500ft Buffer
City Boundary
WIMN Search Results
")Feedlot
")Hazardous Waste
!(Investigation and Cleanup
!(Solid Waste
#*Tanks and Leaks
#*Water
!H Multiple Activities
0 2,700Feet¯Figure 2 - MPCA/MDA WIMN Search ResultsContamination ReviewI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR_ContaminationReview\Figure2_WIMN.mxd Date Saved: 1/30/2020 6:46:54 AM1 inch = 2,700 f eet
")
")
#*!H
#*
#*
!(
")
#*!H
GnWX
%&d(
%&c(MAIN ST20TH AVE80TH ST
7
9
11
14
17 20
1 inch = 2,000 f eet Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR_ContaminationReview\Figure2A_WIMN.mxd Date Saved: 1/30/2020 6:51:40 AMContam ination ReviewI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN
Study Area500ft BufferCity BoundaryWIMN Sear ch Results
")Feedlot
")Hazardous Waste
!(Solid Waste
#*Tanks and Leaks
#*Water
!H Multiple A ctivities
Figure 2A - MPCA/MDA WIMN Search Results
0 2,000Feet¯
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
!H
!H
#*
!H
")
!H
#*
")
")
#*
!H
!H !H
!H
")
")
#*
")
#*
")
")
")
#*#*#*#*
#*
#*!(
!(
!(!(
!(
")
#*
")
#*
!H
#*
#*
#*
#*
!H
")
")
")
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*#*
!H
!H
!H
#*
#*
!H
#*
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
!H
#*
!(
!(
!(
#*
#*
")
#*
GnWX %&c(20TH AVECENTERVILLE RDMAIN ST
OTTER LAKE RDBIRCH ST
01
2
3
4
5
6
8
10
12
13 15 16 1819
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3940
41
42
43
44
45
1 inch = 1,700 f eet Document Path: K:\015144-000\GIS\Maps\AUAR_ContaminationReview\Figure2B_WIMN.mxd Date Saved: 1/30/2020 6:57:46 AMContam ination ReviewI-35 Corridor AUAR ProjectLino Lakes, MN
Study Area500ft BufferCity BoundaryWIMN Sear ch Results
")Hazardous Waste
!(Investigation and Cleanup
#*Water
!H Multiple A ctivities
Figure 2B - MPCA/MDA WIMN Search Results
0 1,700Feet¯
Appendix H
Mitigation Plan
1 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
MITIGATION PLAN
The AUAR Mitigation Plan is outlined below.
ITEM 8. PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED
As projects are proposed, the project proposer will be required to obtain permits and approvals. Projects proposed since the original AUAR have
obtained proper approvals. Additional permits that may not be listed here may also be required.
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
Federal
Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be Applied for
Federal Highway Administration Interchange Access Request To be Applied for
State
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Assessment (AUAR) In progress
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Water Quality Certificate To be Applied for
NPDES/SDS General Permit To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be Applied for
State Historic Preservation Office Cultural Resources Review To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of Transportation Use of or Work within MnDOT right of way To be Applied for
Drainage Permit To be Applied for
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriations Permit To be Applied for
Preliminary Well Construction Assessment To be Applied for
Public Waters Work Permit To be Applied for
General Permit 97-0005 for Temporary Water Appropriations
(need if more than 10,000 gpd of water is appropriated
To be applied for, if
necessary
Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Approval To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Approval To be Applied for
Well Location and Construction Approval To be Applied for
Regional
Rice Creek Watershed District Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Approval To be Applied for
2 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
Unit of Government Type of Application Status
Stormwater Management Plan Approval To be Applied for
Wetland Delineation Boundary Confirmation
To be approved upon
completion of wetland
delineation
Certificate of Wetland Exemption To be Applied for
Wetland Impact/Replacement Application
To be approved upon
completion of wetland
delineation
Metropolitan Council Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Approval To be Applied for
County
Anoka County County Roadway Access Permits To be Applied for
Roadway Plan Approval on County Roads To be Applied for
Local
City of Lino Lakes Site Plan Approval To be Applied for
AUAR and Mitigation Plan Approval Ongoing
Planned Unit Development Approval To be Applied for
Preliminary Plat Approval To be Applied for
Final Plat (multiple) Approval To be Applied for
Grading, Excavation and Foundation Permits (multiple) To be Applied for
Building Permits (multiple) To be Applied for
Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit (multiple) To be Applied for
Municipal Water Connection Permit (multiple) To be Applied for
Use Permit – Floodplain District To be Applied for
City Roadway Access/Crossing Permits To be Applied for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) To be Applied for
3 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 11. FISH, WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
11.1 Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, see Figure 10-3),
which includes conservation of “Core” and “Outlier” habitat areas,
buffering these natural resources, and establishing greenway corridors
throughout the AUAR area to provide connectivity for ecological and
wildlife corridors, regional stormwater collection and conveyance, and
passive recreational opportunities.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.2 Add the “Core” and “Outlier” habitat areas to the City’s Parks, Natural
Open Space/Greenways, and Trail System Plan map.
This has been added to Fig 2-9 in the
Comprehensive Plan.
11.3 Require public land dedication of priority natural open space areas
through the subdivision process.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.4 Require that cash in lieu of public land dedication for subdivisions within
the AUAR area be spent within the AUAR area to purchase, restore,
and/or maintain priority natural open space areas.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.5 Consider provisions for conserving “Other” habitat areas (see Figure 10-2)
during the development review process.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.6 Establish mechanisms for ecological restoration, management,
stewardship, and education.
This mitigation measure is ongoing and
implemented through the Comprehensive Wetland
Protection and Management Plan.
11.7 Provide for turtle and other wildlife passage by continuing to require
surmountable curbing in new residential developments and encouraging
ecologically sensitive site design.
This mitigation measure is ongoing. Residential
developments that have occurred within the study
area have all incorporated surmountable curbs.
11.8 Consult with the DNR and/or US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine
appropriate mitigation strategies for activities near the Bald Eagle’s nests
within the AUAR area before development occurs within the vicinity of the
nests, including reviewing recommended disturbance limit guidelines
developed by the DNR.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.9 Continue to enforce the Peltier Lake No-Wake Zone ordinance and
establish buffers to protect the Peltier Lake Heron Rookery.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
4 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
11.9A The City will limit development within 300 meters of the edge of a heron
colony and not allow disturbance in or near colonies from March to
August.
Measure was included in original AUAR within the
text.
11.10 Require rare plant surveys, by qualified personnel, prior to development in
wetland areas and of areas of banded soils between muck soils and
adjacent Isanti, Soderville, or Zimmerman soil map units. These surveys
shall be conducted by qualified professionals at an appropriate time of
year to identify the rare plants.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.11 Encourage ecologically sensitive design and construction practices for the
proposed northerly bypass that would connect I-35W and I-35E.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11.12 Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF) of the AUAR
(Figure 10-3 and 10-2). The CDF includes consideration of:
• Conservation of the most ecologically significant natural resources
within the AUAR area (in particular, the “Core” and “Outlier”
habitats as shown in Figure 10-2 of the original AUAR).
• Protection of ecologically significant natural resources from
adjacent land uses by implementing buffering.
• Connection of ecologically significant natural resources via multi-
functional greenway corridors.
Measure was included in original AUAR within the
text.
5 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 12. WATER RESOURCES: WETLANDS
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
12.1 Delineate wetlands in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual and classify wetlands according to Wetlands of the
United States (Circular 39) and Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
United States.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.2 Follow sequencing process of wetland avoidance, minimization,
rectification, and mitigation as outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) if wetlands area altered.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.3 Apply for applicable wetland permits to obtain authorization for wetland
alterations under WCA and Section 404 prior to project construction if
development activities will impact a jurisdictional wetland.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.4 Mitigate areas of wetland impacts according to the requirements of the
Wetland Conservation Act.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.5 Submit wetland permit applications and replacement plans, as
appropriate, to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Rice
Creek Watershed District, and the City of Lino Lakes.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.6 Follow the requirements for wetland alterations delineated by the Rice
Creek Watershed District (RCWD).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12.7 Minimize or avoid totally any filling of public waters through careful design. This mitigation measure is ongoing.
6 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 13. WATER USE
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
13.1 Monitor water usage and do not permit new development to proceed if it
exceeds the capacity of the water supply and distribution system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.2 Construct the water supply and distribution system in accordance with
Minnesota Department of Health standards and with the goals, policies,
and recommendations set forth in the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply
Plan.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.3 As necessary, amend the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply Plan and
Capital Improvement Plan to be consistent with any future amendments or
updates to the Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or
alterations to the water system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing. No updates
have been needed to date for the study area.
13.4 Follow the adopted Wellhead Protection Plans for Lino Lakes and
Centerville. As necessary, amend the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan for
new wells.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.5 Require abandoned private wells to be sealed in compliance with the
Minnesota Department of Health regulations.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.6 Require that the installation of any private individual wells be constructed
and installed in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health
regulations (Minnesota Well Code).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.7 Continue to implement the City’s adopted water conservation policies
which are intended to attenuate peak water demands throughout the City.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13.8 Mitigation will be regulated through the City’s development approval and
permitting process. Proposed master development plans, planned unit
development and subdivision applications, plats, and/or site plans must
address relevant water conservation mitigation measures prior to final
approval by the City. Implementation of mitigation measures will be
assured through developer agreements with the City, which will require a
financial security for land and infrastructure improvements and/or revoke
the right to acquire building permits and/or certificates of occupancy until
all relevant mitigation measures have been addressed.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
7 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 15. WATER SURFACE USE
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
15.1 Consider restricting individual lake access and dock construction along
public and private shorelands by encouraging the use of clustered access
and dock facilities.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
ITEM 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
16.1 Require project proposers to acquire NPDES/SDS General Stormwater
Permit for Construction Activity from the MPCA prior to initiating
earthwork.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
16.2 Require project proposers to meet the erosion and sediment control
regulations in all applicable regulations, ordinances and rules of the City
and MPCA, and Rice Creek Watershed District.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
16.3 Require project proposers to minimize runoff, improve the quality of runoff,
and provide erosion control through BMPs and other low impact
development techniques.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
16.4 Provide construction oversight to ensure designed sediment and erosion
control measures are being implemented.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
16.5 Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, Figure 10-3). This mitigation measure is ongoing.
ITEM 17. WATER QUALITY: SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
17.3 Require stormwater management systems to be developed in accordance
with the current version of the Rice Creek Watershed District Rules (these
rules assist in achieving the goals of the Resource Management Plan – 3)
and all other local, state, and federal stormwater management
requirements.
Updated to be inclusive of the current version of the
rules.
The RCWD rules are intended to meet the goals of
the Resource Management Plan-3 that was
included in the 2010 AUAR Update.
8 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 18. WATER QUALITY: WASTEWATER
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
18.1 Monitor wastewater flows and not permit new development to proceed if it
exceeds the capacity of the wastewater system.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.2 Construct the major infrastructure improvements needed to expand the
capacity of the wastewater system (i.e. lift stations, forcemains, and
upgrades to the existing systems) in accordance with the Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.3 Adequately phase capacity improvements. This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.4 Amend the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital
Improvement Plan to be consistent with any amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or alterations to
the sanitary sewer system and regional capacity needs.
This mitigation measure is ongoing. No updates
have been needed to date for the study area.
18.5 Each proposed development will be required to provide a detailed
projection of wastewater generation and flows. These calculations will be
checked by the City’s Engineering Consultant.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
18.6 The City will create a year-end report to evaluate wastewater increases by
major sewer lines and overall system usage in relation to capacity.
Results of this assessment will become the targets for growth for the
following year.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
9 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 19. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
19.1 Require the removal of all tanks and associated underground piping in
accordance with applicable state and federal laws.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
19.2 Require that any party that may discover residual petroleum
contamination shall follow state law and report the information to the
MPCA for further investigation and potential remediation.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
ITEM 21. TRANSPORTATION
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
21.1 Create a monitoring program that closely evaluates traffic impacts from
proposed developments within the AUAR area.
Traffic Impact Studies are required for proposed
developments showing the impact on the
transportation system and consistency with the
AUAR.
21.2 Implement traffic mitigation measures as development occurs within the
AUAR area. Specific mitigation measures for the three development
scenarios are discussed in Item 21 and depicted on Figures 21-8, 21-9,
and 21-10. These mitigation measures improve overall traffic operations
for the respective development scenarios. The improvements are
intended to represent the minimum level of infrastructure investment that
would be needed to meet acceptable level of service standards. Additional
roadway and non-motorized improvements, beyond the minimum level,
may be identified to accommodate specific development needs that are
identified within the AUAR area. Primary improvements, regardless of land
use scenario, include:
21.2.1 Develop frontage road system in compliance with local, county,
and state access management guidelines to serve local and regional
traffic.
21.2.2 Work with appropriate road authorities to reconstruct and provide
additional capacity for CSAH 21.
CSAH 14 improvement was completed in 2009 and
noted in the 2010 AUAR Update
CSAH 54 (formerly CSAH 21) 20th Avenue North
intersection improvements were completed and
noted in the 2010 AUAR Update.
I-35E Interchange reconstruction was completed in
2011. This mitigation measure is complete.
10 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
21.2.3 Work with appropriate road authorities to construct Northerly
Bypass with new interchanges at I-35W and I-35E (80th Street East) to
improve traffic operations and access to and within the AUAR area. As
recommended by FHWA and Mn/DOT, a phasing plan should be
established to construct each piece of the Northerly Connector as it
becomes necessary to maintain the serviceability of the transportation
system.
Phase Improvement
1. CSAH 14, I-35W to I-35E (funded and
programmed for construction)
2. CSAH 14, I-35E Interchange
3. CR 140 (80th Street)/I-35E Interchange
4. CSAH 14 across Peltier Lake (Northerly
Bypass/Connector)
5. CSAH 14/I-35W Interchange
As part of these improvements, the following steps should be taken as the
opportunity is presented:
• Inclusion of the northerly bypass and proposed interchanges in
future transportation and comprehensive plans
• Preservation of right of way through official mapping or other
process
• Right of way dedication through the platting process
21.3
Require a traffic impact analysis for all development projects within the
AUAR area. The traffic impact analysis will assist the City and other road
authorities in determining the appropriate mitigation measures that are
required to mitigate impacts of a specific development proposal.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
11 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
21.4 Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the
additional traffic on the on the regional system, specifically Interstates
35W and 35E, by reconstructing each to provide a six-lane cross-section
consistent with the recommendations outlined in the I-35 IRC. It should be
noted that it was determined that an expansion will be necessary even
without the development scenarios used in this analysis. As the
interstates serve a much larger area, the projected growth of the entire
Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by the year 2030.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.5 Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require
project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses,
bicyclists, and pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.6 Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements (see item
#21.2) in future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Submit the plan update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT,
Met Council, etc.).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.7 Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies
related to traffic nose and noise walls.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.8 Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures
such as appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and
appropriate site design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential
areas.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.9 Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for
the Eagle Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.10 Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site
plans make use of access management practices to promote safe,
effective traffic flow.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
21.11 Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway
Department Development Review Process Manual (updated June 2013).
This mitigation measure is ongoing and has been
updated to reflect the newest manual.
21.12 Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable
transportation authorities.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
12 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
ITEM 25. CULTURAL RESOURCES / FARMLANDS
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
25.1 Consult the map that shows areas with a high potential for archaeological
sites when development applications are submitted for review. Given the
sensitive nature of this information, this map cannot be included in the
AUAR document, nor can it be made available to the public. If a
development application falls within an area that is considered to have a
high potential for archaeological sites, the City will require that the
following steps and procedures involved in the identification and analysis
of any archaeological sites is followed prior to development:
Conduct a Phase I archaeological survey within the area of
potential effect (APE). The objective of the archaeological
fieldwork is to determine if there are archaeological sites in
the areas identified as having high potential for such and
define the extent of those sites that may be impacted by
development plans.
Conduct a Phase II archaeological survey. If archaeological
resources are uncovered within the APE that may be eligible
for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
a Phase II survey should be conducted. The objective of the
investigation is to determine whether archaeological
resources are eligible for listing on the NRHP.
Plan for avoidance or conduct Phase III data recovery. If a
significant archaeological site is identified that will be
impacted by development, avoidance is recommended. If this
is not possible, then a data recovery of the site should occur.
If human remains are recovered at any time during
archaeological investigation or development, all activities
must stop, and consultation initiated with the Office of the
State Archaeologist and Minnesota Indian Affairs Council.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
13 Mitigation Plan Update – 2020 January 31, 2020
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
25.2 Consider preservation of agricultural heritage sites by implementing
thoughtful interpretive planning. As development plans for the two Century
Farms come to fruition, the City can encourage landscaping and other
amenities that reflect the agricultural heritage of this city. In addition, the
City can continue to reflect the agricultural heritage of the community in
public buildings and gathering places (for example, City Hall reflects
elements of the community’s agricultural heritage).
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
ITEM 27. COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS
Item No. Mitigation Description Update
27.1 Use the information contained in the AUAR during future considerations of
updates or amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance. Any future consideration of amendments or updates to the
Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances would follow the City’s set
procedures and guidelines for such amendments.
The City has completed the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan.
27.2 Require that tools such as clustering, buffering, and/or screening be
incorporated into future development plans to mitigate potential land use
conflicts.
This mitigation measure is ongoing.
Appendix I
Responses to Comments
1
Comment Response
1. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan scenario has
been added into the AUAR Update. The traffic,
sewer, water, and stormwater technical memos
has been reviewed and updated to include this
scenario in the appendices. This has been added
to the AUAR Update in response to this
comment.
1.
2
Comment Response
2. As part of the long-term planning process, the
City of Lino Lakes is anticipating the future need
for 80th Street to connect to the west. The
planned timing for this connection is post 2040.
The City recognizes the need to begin this
dialogue between the Met Council and Anoka
County and therefore has indicated this future
road connection in its transportation plan and in
this AUAR. This project could be subject to a
separate environmental review process and
would be evaluated for environmental review at
that time.
3. We understand that these improvements are
not identified by Met Council 2040 Transportation
Policy Plan. However, the City has identified the
improvements in the current 2040
Comprehensive Plan update in the “Post-2040”
conditions. It is also understood that as the area
develops these improvements or other
improvements would be considered. If
environmental review for the future roadway
connection is required, it will be completed at that
time.
2.
3.
3
Comment Response
1. Comment noted.
2. As the area develops the traffic noise will be
addressed on a case by case basis.
3. Comment noted.
1.
2.
3.
4
Comment Response
5
Comment Response
1. An extensive cultural resource review was
completed with the original AUAR. The
mitigation plan requires Phase I studies within
sites that fall within areas of high potential for
archaeological sites. These are mitigation
measures 25.1 and 25.2.
2. Comment Noted.
1.
2.
6
Comment Response
Mr. Grochala,
The DNR has reviewed the I-35E Corridor AUAR Update and would like to provide the following
comments:
1. Page 2, Water. When planning for additional municipal water supply infrastructure,
please apply for a Preliminary Well Construction Assessment through MPARS,
MNDNR’s online permitting and reporting system. The City of Lino Lakes is required
to request the amendment of the City of Lino Lakes DNR Water Appropriation Permit
1985-6168 at least 6-12 months prior to exceeding the authorized volume of DNR
Water Appropriation Permit 1985-6168.
2. Page 3, Approved Development. Please note that a DNR Water Appropriation Permit
is required for the pumping of groundwater, pond water, or surface water in volumes
that exceed 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year, to allow grading,
building construction, pond construction, stream crossing construction and the
construction of utilities.
3. Page 5, Water Resources. Under Section 11.a.i., please include MNDNR Public
Waters Inventory numbers for Peltier Lake, Rondeau Lake, Clearwater Creek, and
Hardwood Creek.
4. Page 6, Stormwater. The DNR urges the City of Lino Lakes to consider using
stormwater to irrigate landscaping as a means of conserving groundwater. Minnesota
Statutes exempt stormwater use from DNR Water Appropriation Permit requirements.
5. Page 7, Surface Waters. Under Section 11.b.iv., please include MNDNR in the list of
agencies under which future projects affecting water resources may be regulated.
6. Page 7, Surface Waters. Please note that Hardwood Creek and Peltier Lake are
impaired waters. Every effort must be made to reduce further impact to these public
waters. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of
road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams
does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially
reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local
business and city applicator participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. More information and resources can be
found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart
Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have
used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations.
7. Page 8, Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare
features). Items 13.a-d. do not provide any discussion of natural resources. The
2/20/2020 Natural Heritage letter was not included in AUAR attachments. Please see
a copy of this letter (attached to this email) and include it, and a discussion of its
contents, in the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. The City of Lino Lakes contains many
natural resources which could be impacted by this project.
8. Appendix C, Water Appropriation Memo, Page 5. Appendix C indicates that the City
of Lino Lakes will need to construct an additional three wells to serve the growth in
1. The City will obtain any necessary permits
and reviews for city-lead projects. The
Preliminary Well Construction Assessment
has been added to Item 8 in the Update and
the Mitigation Plan.
2. Comment noted. This permit was listed in the
AUAR Update.
3. These PWI numbers have been added to the
Update.
4. Comment note. This will be taken into
consideration as development is proposed in
the study area.
5. The DNR has been added to this section.
6. These waters have been noted as impaired in
this section.
7. The DNR NHIS letter has been added to the
Update in the appendix and referenced in this
section. The information from the NHIS
system is similar to information obtained
during the original AUAR and its subsequent
updates. The mitigation plan acknowledges
the areas contained within the Minnesota
Biological Survey Sites of Biological
Significance.
8. This Assessment has been added to the
AUAR and Mitigation Plan as noted in
Response #1 above.
7
population of the City of Lino Lakes. Please note that the DNR will need to conduct a
“Well Construction – Preliminary Assessment” for each of the new wells within 6-12
months prior to the construction of the well.
9. The majority of the area covered by the I-35E AUAR is within the Drinking Water
Supply Management Area of the City of Lino Lakes. This is an area where
groundwater pollution will enter the water system of the City of Lino Lakes within 10
years of the initial contamination event. Care should be taken in the handling of
potential pollutants in this area.
10. Due to entanglement issues with small animals, use of erosion control blankets
throughout the project should be limited to ‘bio-netting’ or ‘natural netting’ types, and
specifically not products containing plastic mesh netting or other plastic components.
These are Category 3N or 4N in the 2016 & 2018 MnDOT Standards Specifications
for Construction. Also be aware that hydro-mulch products may contain small
synthetic (plastic) fibers to aid in its matrix strength. These loose fibers could
potentially re-suspend and make their way into Public Waters. As such, please review
mulch products and do not allow any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives
in areas that drain to Public Waters.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Melissa Collins
Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources
Pronouns: She/her
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
Phone: 651-259-5755
Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us
mndnr.gov
9. This comment is noted.
10. The comment is noted and will be reviewed
when development is proposed in the study
area.