The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-08-2020 Council Work Session PacketCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Council Chambers 6:00 P.M. 1. Birch Street Roundabout Landscaping, Michael Grochala 2. Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, Katie Larsen 3. Otter Crossing, Katie Larsen 4. Lois Lane Traffic Evaluation, Diane Hankee 5. CR J and Hodgson Rd Trunk Utility Project, Diane Hankee 6. 7831 Lake Drive, Variance for Roofing Materials, Katie Larsen 7. Election Judge Salary, Julie Bartell 8. Advisory Board Application – Park Board, Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues 9. Lino Lakes YMCA, Michael Grochala 10. North Metro Television CARES Act Funds Request, Sarah Cotton 11. 2021 Budget Update, Sarah Cotton 12. Temporary Wage Increase, Sarah Cotton 13. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council 14. Review Regular Agenda 15. Adjourn WS – Item 1 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 1 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Birch Street (CSAH 34) Landscaping Improvements Background Anoka County is proceeding with final design of the Birch Street reconstruction project. The City Council discussed options for landscaping the roundabout at the August 3, 2020 work session. Based on City Council direction, WSB proceeded with modification of the “enhanced” design. Changes to the plans include: 1. Replaced the river rock with a low grow fescue grass 2. The planting beds were reconfigured to aid in adjacent turf management. 3. Irrigation and electrical were incorporated 4. Mulch bedding was specified as a dark brown Plans are nearing completion and will be submitted to Anoka County for incorporation into the overall plan set. The construction cost is estimated at $49,000. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting final comments from City Council on the design. Attachments 1. Roundabout landscaping design TYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCHLOW GROW FESCUE SEED MIXWITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(3)2" Cal B&BTCH(24)No. 1 Cont.GFRG(3)No. 5 Cont.DMP(60)No. 1 Cont.FGBD(48)No. 1 Cont.FCATTYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCHLANDSCAPE ALUMINUM EDGER3'R13'R34'APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1"WATER SERVICECONDUITTYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHLOW GROW FESCUE SEED MIXWITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(3)2" Cal B&BTCH(24)No. 1 Cont.GFRG(3)No. 5 Cont.DMP(46)No. 1 Cont.FGBD(38)No. 1 Cont.FCATTYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCHLANDSCAPE ALUMINUM EDGER3'R 1 3 ' R34'APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1"WATER SERVICECONDUITNOTE:-INLET PROTECTION TO BE PLACED IN ALL CATCHBASINS PRIOR TO PLANTING WORK IN ROUNDABOUT.-PROVIDE DESIGN-BUILD IRRIGATION SYSTEM (REFERTO SPECIFICATIONS)-TOPSOIL ADDED TO ROUNDABOUT AT 6" THICK.-TYPE 6 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE DARKBROWN AND MIN OF 4" THICK.LOW GROW FESCUE SEED MIXTURE:(SEEDING RATE 250 IBS PER ACRE)25% BLUE MESA SHEEP FESCUE25% NANOOK HARD FESCUE25% INTRIGUE CHEWINGS FESCUE25% CELESTIAL CREEPING RED FESCUEK:\016591-000\Cad\Proposed\016591-000_L-SITE-PLANTING PLAN.dwg 9/1/2020 4:42:05 PM NSCALE IN FEET02010WEST ROUNDABOUT 1L1.1TOTSHEET OFSHEETSANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTACSAH 34 (Birch Street) ImprovementsAnoka County Highway DepartmentS.A.P. 002-634-003 & S.A.P. 210-020-010XTOTEAST ROUNDABOUT2L1.1L1.1 (MnDOT 3861.2C)345a5b43425a2110665b5b(MnDOT 2571.3F2)(SHIGO METHOD)BRANCH BARKRIDGEDEADBRANCH(MnDOT 2571.3K2a9 and 2571.3E1)LIVE BRANCHGENERAL NOTESSEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.REFER TO MnDOT SPECIFICATIONS 2571, 3861, AND THE INSPECTION ANDCONTRACT ADMINISTRATION MANUAL FOR MnDOT LANDSCAPE PROJECTS" FORGENERAL REQUIREMENTS.COMPLETE PREPARATORY WORK BEFORE STARTING INITIAL PLANTING OPERATIONS.ACCEPT ALL PLANT STOCK IN ACCORDANCE WITH (MnDOT 3861) PRIOR TO PLANTING.THE CONTRACTOR WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCY FOR SOIL CULTIVATIONOPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH (MnDOT 2571.3D2 STEP 4)THE CONTRACTOR WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCY FOR ALL PLANT INSTALLATIONOPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH (MnDOT 2571.3F1)RODENTPROTECTIONSEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (C)FERTILIZERSEE SPECIAL PROVISIONSCOMPOSTMnDOT 3890 GRADE 2 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.MULCHMATERIALMnDOT 3882 TYPE 6 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.MASSPLANTINGBEDSPREPARE MASS PLANTING BEDS FOR PLANTS PLACED AT ___ ORLESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON SHEETS. PLANT BEDS INSTAGGERED ROWS ON THE PERIMETER FIRST, THEN UNIFORMLYFILL IN WITH REMAINING PLANTS. USE TRIANGULAR SPACING,UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. PROVIDE 5' RADIUS CLEAR OFSHRUBS AROUND EACH DECIDUOUS TREE AND 8' CLEAR RADIUSAROUND EACH CONIFER TREE. RADIUS WILL BE MEASURED FROMTHE CENTER OF THE TREE TO THE CENTER OF THE SHRUB.NOTIFY ENGINEER OF GROSS PLANT QUANTITY SURPLUS ORDEFICIENCY IMMEDIATELY. MULCH ENTIRE MASS PLANTING BED.SEE STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (C)TREEPAINTING(FROSTCRACKPREVENTION)PAINT OAK, LINDEN, LOCUST, MAPLE, CRABAPPLE AND MOUNTAINASH. ONLY UNDILUTED EXTERIOR WHITE LATEX PAINT ISACCEPTABLE. PAINT TREE CIRCUMFERENCE FROM GROUND LINE TOFIRST MAJOR BRANCH.PLANTING PLANDIMENSIONSSTATED DIMENSIONS SUPERCEDE SCALING FROM PLAN.WATERING GUIDELINES (MnDOT 2571.3G)PLANT TYPEAVERAGE GALLONS OFWATER PER APPLICATIONMACHINE TRANSPLANTEDTREES50-100BALLED AND BURLAPPEDTREES20BARE ROOT AND CONTAINERTREES15BALLED AND BURLAPPEDSHRUBS10BARE ROOT AND CONTAINERSHRUBS7WOODY SEEDLINGS4PERENNIALS AND VINES3IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MONITOR ANDMAINTAIN SOIL MOISTURE AT ADEQUATE BUT NOT EXCESSIVELEVELS. THE AMOUNTS LISTED ABOVE ARE GUIDELINES, NOTREQUIREMENTS.ACCEPTABLE PLANT STOCK GROWING RANGE LIMITSSOURCE: USDA PLANT HARDINESS ZONE MAPooooCANADANDSDNEMNIAKSMOILINOHMIWIMTWYCOPANYooPLANT INSTALLATION PERIODPROJECT LOCATIONPLANTING SOILDIRECTION OFSPADINGMACHINEDIRECTION OFSPADINGMACHINE(MnDOT 2571.3D2)CULTIVATEDINPLACE SOILDEPTH(MnDOT 2571.3D2)CORRECTPRUNINGCUTTOOCLOSETOOLONGTOOSLANTEDPRUNINGBRANCHES PRUNED TO LIVE BUDBRANCHES PRUNED AT TRUNKLIVE BUDBRANCH COLLARAA12" 16"ZONESLEGEND MIN. TEMP.34FOR ALL PLANT STOCK, DOCUMENT ACCEPTABILITY FOR HARDINESS IN THEMINNESOTA ZONE WHERE THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED, AS FOLLOWS:A.PLANT STOCK CONTINUOUSLY GROWN FOR AT LEAST THE LAST TWOYEARS WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS SHOWN.ORB.PLANT STOCK, GROWN OUTSIDE THE ACCEPTABLE GROWING RANGELIMITS, HAVING SEED SOURCE OR ROOT AND GRAFT STOCKORIGINATING FROM THE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS SHOWN. -34.4 TO -40 F -28.9 TO -34.4 F -26.1 TO -28.9 F5aQUEBECONTARIOSASKATCHEWANMANITOBALAKELAKE LAKELAKELAKESUPERIORMICHIGAN HURONERIE ONTANOZONESLEGENDACCEPTABLE ZONESUNACCEPTABLE ZONESLAKE 0, 1, 2,5b and 6PLANTING DATES BY ZONE34SPRING DECIDUOUS BAREROOT APRIL 21 APRIL 7TOTO JUNE 1 JUNE 1CONTAINERB&B APRIL 21 APRIL 7TOTO JUNE 30 JUNE 30CONIFEROUS APRIL 21 APRIL 7TOTO JUNE 1 MAY 17PERENNIALS MAY 1 MAY 1TOTO JUNE 30 JUNE 30SEEDLINGS APRIL 21 APRIL 7TOTO JUNE 1 JUNE 1FALL DECIDUOUS BAREROOTOCT. 1OCT. 10TOTONOV. 1NOV. 15CONTAINERB&BAUG. 25AUG. 25TOTOOCT. 15NOV. 1CONIFEROUSAUG. 25AUG. 25TOTOSEPT. 15SEPT. 15PERENNIALSAUG. 25AUG. 25TOTOSEPT. 15SEPT. 151.BARE ROOT PERENNIALS MUST BEINSTALLED IN THE SPRING NO LATER THANJUNE 1ST OR FOLLOW THE FALLDECIDUOUS PLANTING DATES.2.ACTUAL DATES MAY CHANGE DEPENDINGUPON SEASONAL CONDITIONS, ASDETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.3.FALL PLANTING IS NOT ALLOWED FORBARE ROOT FORM OF THE FOLLOWINGSPECIES: HAWTHORN, DOGWOOD, POPLAR,HACKBERRY, LINDEN, IRONWOOD,HONEYLOCUST, BIRCH, MOUNTAIN ASH,MAPLE, WILLOW, CRABAPPLE, PLUM/CHERRY,OAKS, AND SUMAC.4.ALL REPLACEMENT PLANTS MUST BEINSTALLED DURING THE MONTH OF MAY(SPRING PLANTING) AND SEPTEMBER (FALLPLANTING) DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF THEPLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD.5.MACHINED MOVED PLANTING DATES WILLBE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL POVISIONS.STEPS TO PRUNING WITH PRUNINGSAW:1.CUT PART WAY THROUGH THEBRANCH AT POINT A.2.CUT COMPLETELY THROUGHBRANCH FROM POINT B TO A.3.AT BRANCH COLLAR CUT FROMPOINT C TO D.INCORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO X (TOO CLOSE) WILL RESULT INDISCONTINUOUS CALLUS FORMATIONAFTER ONE SEASON OF GROWTH.CORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO D(LEAVING BRANCH COLLAR BUT NOTTHE STUB FROM POINT B TO A)WILL RESULT IN CONTINUOUSDOUGHNUT SHAPED CALLUSFORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.PRUNING NOTES:1.PRUNE USING CLEAN ANDSHARP SCISSOR-TYPE PRUNEROR PRUNING SAW.2.THE BEST TIME TO PRUNE ISLATE DORMANT SEASON OREARLY SPRING.3.AVOID PRUNING OAKS IN APRIL,MAY, JUNE OR JULY.4.IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY ORIF WOUNDS OCCUR TO OAKTREES IN APRIL, MAY, JUNE ORJULY, IMMEDIATELY PAINT CUTSURFACE OR WOUND WITHLATEX PAINT OR SHELLAC.D4 INCHES OF GRADE 2COMPOST AND OTHERSPECIFIED ADDITIVESTHOROUGHLY MIXED WITHINPLACE CULTIVATED SOILSPRIMARY TILLAGE - PASS 1INCORPORATION TILLAGE - PASS 2BBCCDXK:\016591-000\Cad\Proposed\016591-000_L-SITE-PLANTING PLAN.dwg 9/1/2020 4:42:09 PM TOTSHEET OFSHEETSANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTACSAH 34 (Birch Street) ImprovementsAnoka County Highway DepartmentS.A.P. 002-634-003 & S.A.P. 210-020-010XTOTL1.2 INSTALL GRANULAR FILTERINSTALL TILE DRAINAGE1.EXCAVATE HOLE OR BED TO ALLOW PLACING THE TOP OF ROOT MASS 1"-3" HIGHER THANFINISHED GRADE.2.AUGER 8" DIAMETER HOLES ENTIRELY THROUGH IMPERVIOUS OR POORLY DRAINED HARD PAN SOILLAYER TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN SUBSOIL.3.TEST FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. RE-AUGER AN ADDITIONAL 8" IF NECESSARY FOR POSITIVEDRAINAGE.4.THOUROUGHLY BACKFILL AUGER HOLES WITH A UNIFORM INCORPORATED MIXTURE OF 50% SANDAND 50% INPLACE SOIL.5.COMPLETE PLANTING ACCORDING TO ROOT TYPE. SEE STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (B).1.EXCAVATE HOLE OR BED TO ALLOW PLACING THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS 1"-3"HIGHER THAN FINISHED GRADE.2.INSTALL 4" MINIMUM DIAMETER DRAIN TILE DAYLIGHTING AT A LOWER GRADE.3.COMPLETE PLANTING ACCORDING TO ROOT TYPE. SEE STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (B).INSTALL MINI-BERM1.THE NEED FOR USING PLANTING DETAILS FOR POORLY DRAINED SOILS ANDWHICH TYPE TO USE ARE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TOENGINEER APPROVAL.1.EXCAVATE HOLE OR BED 1/4 THE DEPTH OF THE ROOT MASS.2.SET ROOT MASS IN HOLE.3.CONSTRUCT BERM WITH PLANTING SOIL. EXTEND THE BERM BASE TO A WIDTH OF 3TIMES THE BERM HEIGHT.4.COMPLETE PLANTING ACCORDING ROOT TYPE. SEE STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (B).1.USE SEAMLESS, EXTRUDED,TWIN-WALL, RIGID AND SEMITRANSLUCENT POLYPROPYLENETUBES WITH A LASER LINEPERFORATION AND ANOUTWARD-FLARED TOP RIM.2.SECURE SHELTER WITH NYLONCABLE-TIES ATTACHED TO A 1''x 1'' WHITE OAK STAKE TOPREVENT DISLODGING ORTWISTING.3.EMBED THE BOTTOM OF THETUBE A MINIMUM OF 1'' BELOWTHE SOIL SURFACE WITHOUTDISTURBING THE TREE ROOTS.4.INSTALL A PLASTICPHOTODEGRADABLE NETTINGCOVER AND SLEEVE OVER THETOP OF THE TUBE. PULLNETTING DOWN AS SHOWN.5' FOR DECIDUOUS TREES8' FOR CONIFEROUS TREESPLANT SPACING IN MASS BEDS(MnDOT 2571.3D2 (STEP 8)NOTE:1.ON 1:2 SLOPES OR GREATER, DO NOT CONSTRUCTTHE UPHILL HALF OF THE WATERING BASIN.PLANTING ON SLOPES2'-0" MIN.12" TO 14"PREVAILING WINDCABLE-TIE TOSECURE STAKE INFORMED TUBERECESSSTAKE(LENGTH VARIES)LASER LINEPERFORATIONTUBE SHELTERNETTING(MnDOT 2571.3I4)1.FORM A DOUBLE-LAYERED CYLINDER USING 0.25" GRID GALVANIZED WELDED WIRE MESH (HARDWARECLOTH). OVERLAP THE CUT END 2".2.DRIVE TWO 1" x 1" OPPOSING HEARTWOOD WHITE OAK STAKES INTO THE GROUND, 7" FROM THECENTER OF THE TREE STEM.3.SECURE THE MESH CYLINDER TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE STAKES USING EITHER, SCREWS AND WASHERSOR CABLE-TIES ALONG THE OVERLAP. SPACE APPROXIMATELY 4" ON CENTER ALONG THE OVERLAP.a.SCREWS SHALL BE ROUND HEAD GALVANIZED 1/8" DIA. x 3/4" LONG WITH WASHERS.b.CABLE-TIES SHALL BE NYLON, AT LEAST 8" LONG AND BETWEEN 75LB TO 120LB TENSILESTRENGTH.4.EMBED THE LOWER EDGE OF THE MESH CYLINDER 1" BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE WITHOUT DISTURBINGTHE TREE ROOTS.5.CUT EDGES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED AT THE TOP OF THE CYLINDER. STAKE WILL BE FLUSH WITHTHE TOP OF THE CYLINDER.6.MULCH WITHIN THE CYLINDER SHALL NOT EXCEED 3" DEPTH AND SHALL BE PULLED BACK FROM THETRUNK AS SPECIFIED IN MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL.7.THE BOTTOM WHORL OF PINE AND LARCH BRANCHES MAY HAVE TO BE REMOVED TO PERMITINSTALLATION OF 12" MIN. HEIGHT RODENT GUARDS.8.INSTALL ON ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE AND LARCH TREES, DO NOT PLACE ON SPRUCE TREES.(MnDOT 2571.3I2) A B C D 1.STEEL POSTS TO BE NOTCHEDOR DRILLED TO RETAIN GUYWIRES. PLACE OUTSIDE OFROOT BALL. DRIVE PLUMBREGARDLESS OF GROUNDSLOPE.2.REQUESTS TO SUBSTITUTERUBBER HOSE AND WIREGUYING SYSTEMS WILL NOTBE APPROVED.4.REMOVE WITHIN ONE YEAR.3. TREE STAKING IS NOT REQUIRED UNLESS SPECIFIED OR NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMB CONDITION WHERE VANDALISM, SOIL, OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.10', 2.2 LB. FLANGEDCHANNEL STEEL SIGNPOST (MnDOT 3401)OR APPROVED EQUAL.(MnDOT 2571.3I1)ROLLED STEEL FENCEPOST (MnDOT 3403)OR APPROVED EQUAL.HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITHMINIMUMS FROM THE PLANTING HOLE DIMENSIONSCHART ON STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS (B)FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)PLANTING DETAIL FOR POORLY DRAINED SOILS8" AUGERHOLES4" DRAINTILEFOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)CUT AREAEXISTING GRADEUPHILL HALFWATER BASINDOWN HILL HALFWATER BASINFOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)PLANT ACCORDING TOROOT TYPE.SEE STANDARD PLANTINGDETAILS (B)SOIL RIDGE TOHOLD WATER IN BASIN.FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)SEEDLING TREE SHELTERRODENT PROTECTIONSTAKING AND GUYINGSTEEL POST SIZINGCALIPERSTEEL POST TYPEABCDLESS THEN4 INCHES7'-0"3'-0"MIN.4'-0"3'-0"GREATERTHEN 4INCHES10'-0"4'-0"MIN.6'-0"5'-0"16" LONGPOLYROPYLENE ORPOLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL.THICK AND 1.5" WIDESTRAPS. ATTACH WITH10 ga WIRE.STEEL POSTSEE CHART118 112118 1/4ROOTMASS 15"WIRE MESHSTAKE24" MIN. HT. FORDECIDUOUS TREES12" MIN. HT. FORCONIFEROUS TREES134K:\016591-000\Cad\Proposed\016591-000_L-SITE-PLANTING PLAN.dwg 9/1/2020 4:42:14 PM TOTSHEET OFSHEETSANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTACSAH 34 (Birch Street) ImprovementsAnoka County Highway DepartmentS.A.P. 002-634-003 & S.A.P. 210-020-010XTOTL1.3 3 x3 / 5 x HEIGHT18"B AB B AMINIMUM TREE SPADE SIZE REQUIREMENTSOAK TREE,CALIPERDECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTALTREE,CALIPERCONIFEROUSTREE, HEIGHT42"1" to 1.5"2" to 3"5' to 7'60"1.5" to 2.5"3" to 4"7' to 9'78"2.5" to 3.5"4" to 6"9' to 14'85"3.5" to 5"6" to 8"14' to 18'(C) SPADEDIAMETERSIZEBALLED & BURLAPPED STOCK1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLYCOMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOTFLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADEWITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS.5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OFTHE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT.6.REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWOHORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALLBURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL.REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLINGROOTS.7.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.8.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTSAND FILL VOIDS.9.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME.10.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERINGUNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.1.SOAK ROOTS IN WATER FOR AT LEAST ONE HOUR BUTNOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANTING.2.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.3.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF THE TOP ANDROOTS.4.TRANSFER PLANT DIRECTLY FROM WATER TO HOLE. SETPLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT THE FINISHED SOILELEVATION. SPREAD ROOTS OUT EVENLY. PLUMB ANDIMMEDIATELY BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLEPLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME.7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.BARE ROOT STOCK1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT.3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASSTO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS.REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS.4.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ORTHOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALLPLANT SO THE TOP OF THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UPTO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE.5.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.6.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTAND FILL VOIDS.7.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME.8.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.CONTAINER STOCKMACHINE MOVED STOCK1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING.3.SET PLANT ON NATIVE SOIL AT SAME DEPTH AS IT WASPREVIOUSLY GROWN.4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL.5.AFTER PLANTING, LOOSEN THE SOIL IMMEDIATELYADJACENT TO THE ROOT BALL TO A MINIMUM DISTANCEOF 18" AND A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12".6.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTAND FILL VOIDS.7.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER A SECOND TIME.8.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECONDWATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)LOOSENEDSOILFOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)FOR MULCH DETAILSEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAIL (B)(MnDOT 2571.3F)PLANTING HOLE DIMENSIONSHOLE DEPTH FOR B&B AND CONTAINER PLANTS SHALL NOT EXCEED MEASUREMENT FROM ROOTFLAIR TO BOTTOM OF SOIL BALL.PLANT TYPEPLANT SIZE UP TOAND INCLUDING(A) MINIMUM HOLEWIDTH(B) APPROXIMATEHOLE DEPTHDECIDUOUS &ORNAMENTALTREES3' B.R.46"13"4' B.R46"14"5' B.R.48"14"6' B.R.54"15"7' B.R60"16"8' B.R.66"19"0.75" B.R.48'12"1" B.R.54"14"1.25" B.R.60"14"1.5 B.R.66"15"1.75" B.R72"16"2" B.R.84"19"4' B.B.42"11"5' B.B.48"12"6' B.B.52"14"8' B.B.66"16"10' B.B.66"16"12' B.B.48"16"1" B.B.54"14"1.25" B.B.56"15"1.5" B.B.61"15"1.75" B.B.66"16"2" B.B.72"16"2.5" B.B.84"19"3" B.B.96"20"3.5" B.B.114"23"4" B.B.126"25"DECIDUOUSSHRUBS, ROSESAND PERENNIALS12" B.R.24"7"15" B.R.28"8"18" B.R.30"8"2' B.R.33"9"3' B.R.42"11"4' B.B.48"12"PERENNIAL HOLEDEPTH AND WIDTHSHALL BE BASEDUPON ON-CENTERSPACING IN ACONTINUOUS TRENCH.5' B.R.54"14"6' B.R.60"14"18" B.B.27"7"2' B.B.30"8"3' B.B.36"9"4' B.B.42"11"5' B.B.48"12"6' B.B.54"14"(MnDOT 2571.3H)MIN. 2'-0"MIN. 2'-0"PLANTING HOLE DIMENSIONSHOLE DEPTH FOR B&B AND CONTAINER PLANTS SHALL NOT EXCEED MEASUREMENT FROM ROOTFLAIR TO BOTTOM OF SOIL BALL.PLANT TYPEPLANT SIZE UP TOAND INCLUDING(A) MINIMUM HOLEWIDTH(B) APPROXIMATEHOLE DEPTHCONIFEROUSTREES2' B.B36"10"3' B.B42"11"4' B.B51"13"AT LEAST 2/3 OF ALLCONIFER BRANCHESWILL CONTAINTERMINAL BUDS5' B.B60"13"6' B.B66"15"7' B.B72"16"8' B.B81"18"9' B.B90"20"10' B.B102"21"12' B.B114"24"CONIFEROUSSHRUBS18" B.B.24"7"3' B.B.48"12"(UPRIGHT)CONIFEROUSSHRUBS18" SPR B.B.30"8"2' SPR B.B.36"9"(SPREADING)CONTAINERGROWN PLANTSCELLPACKS / PLUGS6"2.5"2.25" CONT.7"3"3.5" CONT.10"3"4" CONT.11"4"4.5" CONT.13"4"6"/1 QT CONT.15"5.5"1# CONT.18"6"2# CONT.23"7.5"3# CONT.29"8.5"5# CONT.30"11"7# CONT.37"11"15# CONT.44"14"10# CONT.45"15"20# CONT.60"16"25# CONT.72"17"SEEDLINGS6" SEEDLING15"14"9" SEEDLING18"14"12" SEEDLING23"16"18" SEEDLING30"16"2' SEEDLING36"18"VINES1 YR. MED B.R.15"11"1 YR. NO. 1 B.R.17"14'2 YR. MED. B.R.33"12"2 YR. NO. 1 B.R.42"15"INSTALLATION OF PLANTSMULCH PLACEMENTINSTALLATION OF VINESCHAIN-LINK FENCEINPLACE WALL1" x 36" WOOD LATHDRIVEN 12" INTO SOILAT AN ANGLE SO THETOP RESTS SNUGLEYAGAINST THE WALLOR FENCEMULCH CONTINUOUSLYBETWEEN VINES AND5' BEYOND TERMINALVINEFASTEN LOOSELY TOLATH WITHBIODEGRADABLE STRINGFOR PLANTING SOILDETAIL SEE STANDARDPLANTING DETAILS (A)MIN.TYPE OF PLANTSQ. FT. PER PLANTCONIFEROUS TREES2DECIDUOUS ANDORNAMENTAL TREESCONIFEROUS ANDDECIDUOUS SHRUBS,ROSE BUSHS,PERENNIALS,ORNAMENTAL GRASSSPACING x SPACINGVINESSPACING x 22MULCH AREA CALCULATOR = 3.14166" MAX +3XSPADE DIAMETER+1XMACHINE-MOVEDTREES OR SHRUBS1.PULL MULCH BACK NOLESS THAN 3" ANDNO MORE THAN 6"FROM TREES ANDSHRUBS AT THETRUNK OR MAIN STEM.2.SUBSIDING ORDETERIORATING MULCHIS ACCEPTABLETHROUGHOUT THEESTABLISHED PERIOD IFTHE MULCH DEPTH ISMAINTAINED AT AMINIMUM 3" DEPTH.3.ADD MULCH WHENBELOW THE 3"MINIMUM DEPTH, DONOT EXCEED THE 6"MAXIMUM DEPTH.4.MULCH CONTAMINATEDWITH SOIL MUST BEREMOVED ANDREPLACED.CONIFEROUS ANDDECIDUOUS SHRUB (3'min.)CONIFEROUS TREE (RADIUS+3' min.)WALL INSTALLATIONFENCE INSTALLATION15 8 4341 222438412A12"'NOTE: PLANT ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE ROOT STOCK DETAILS TO RIGHTHEIGHT 114DECIDUOUS TREE (3' min.)TRANSPLANT (RADIUS+2' min.)SPACING FROM TRUNKK:\016591-000\Cad\Proposed\016591-000_L-SITE-PLANTING PLAN.dwg 9/1/2020 4:42:22 PM TOTSHEET OFSHEETSANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTACSAH 34 (Birch Street) ImprovementsAnoka County Highway DepartmentS.A.P. 002-634-003 & S.A.P. 210-020-010XTOTL1.4 <2"2-4">4-9">9-14">14-19">19"2'4'6'10'12'15'2'2.5'2.5'3'3.25'4'TREE PROTECTION ZONEABCCORRECTPRUNINGCUTTOOCLOSETOOLONGTOOSLANTEDPRUNINGBRANCHES PRUNED TO LIVE BUDBRANCHES PRUNED AT TRUNKBBCCDDXLIVE BUDBRANCH COLLARAABRANCH BARKRIDGEDEADBRANCH(MnDOT 2571.3K2a9 and 2571.3E1)STEPS TO PRUNING WITH PRUNINGSAW:1.CUT PART WAY THROUGH THEBRANCH AT POINT A.2.CUT COMPLETELY THROUGHBRANCH FROM POINT B TO A.3.AT BRANCH COLLAR CUT FROMPOINT C TO D.INCORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO X (TOO CLOSE) WILL RESULT INDISCONTINUOUS CALLUS FORMATIONAFTER ONE SEASON OF GROWTH.CORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO D(LEAVING BRANCH COLLAR BUT NOTTHE STUB FROM POINT B TO A)WILL RESULT IN CONTINUOUSDOUGHNUT SHAPED CALLUSFORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.PRUNING NOTES:1.PRUNE USING CLEAN ANDSHARP SCISSOR-TYPE PRUNEROR PRUNING SAW.2.THE BEST TIME TO PRUNE ISLATE DORMANT SEASON OREARLY SPRING.3.AVOID PRUNING OAKS IN APRIL,MAY, JUNE OR JULY.4.IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY ORIF WOUNDS OCCUR TO OAKTREES IN APRIL, MAY, JUNE ORJULY, IMMEDIATELY PAINT CUTSURFACE OR WOUND WITHLATEX PAINT OR SHELLAC.LIVE BRANCHUTILITY CONSTRUCTION (MnDOT 2572.3A5)TREEBORE TUNNELDIRECTIONALDRILLINGMACHINEMINIMUM DISTANCEFROM TREE TRUNKMINIMUMDEPTH OFTUNNELMEASURE TREEDIAMETER AT4.5 ft ABOVEGROUNDADRIP LINECRITICAL ROOTZONETEMPORARY FENCE(MnDOT 2572.3A1)DESIRED25'-0"CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSTREEPROTECTIONSIGNDRIP LINECRITICAL ROOTZONETree Protection AreaDO NOT ENTER THE FENCED AREAWe appreciate your cooperation toprotect these trees duringconstructionSLOPE ROUNDINGTEMPORARY FENCEREDUCED ROUNDINGNORMAL ROUNDINGDRIP LINECRITICAL ROOTZONEOTHER VEGETATION PROTECTION MEASURESROOT SYSTEM BRIDGEWOODCHIP MULCH BEDTIMBERSSTEEL PLATES6" WOODCHIPMULCH(MnDOT 2572.3A12)IF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST PASS OVER ROOT ZONES,THE CONTRACTOR MUST EITHER:1.CONSTRUCT ROOT SYSTEM BRIDGES WITH STEEL PLATESUPPORTED ON WOOD TIMBERS PLACED RADIALLY TO THETREE TRUNK.ORDRIP LINECRITICAL ROOTZONESSANDY LOAM TOPSOIL(MnDOT 2572.3A4)EXISTING GROUNDBACKFILLSANDY LOAMFILLPERFORATEDPIPE1.ANY FILL REQUIRED WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF TREES, ISUNCOMPACTED SANDY LOAM TOPSOIL (WITH A COARSESAND COMPONENT).2.EXCESSIVE FILL MAY REQUIRE INSTALLING PERFORATED PIPEWITH AT LEAST ONE DAYLIGHTED END OPENING AS ANAERATION SYSTEM.DRIP LINECRITICAL ROOTZONECLEAN ROOT CUTTINGMAXIMUM DEPTH NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTIONEXCAVATIONAREACLEAN ROOT CUTTINGROOT SYSTEMBRIDGE(MnDOT 2572.3A2)NOTE:1.(A) IS THE DIAMETER OF TREES MEASURED4-6 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND AND ISTERMED THE "DIAMETER AT BREASTHEIGHT," (DBH).2.USING A TREE DIAMETER TAPE, WRAP THETAPE AROUND THE GIRTH OF THE TREE, ATTHE DBH, BEING CAREFUL NOT TO TWISTTHE TAPE.SIGNIFICANT TREES NEAR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS WILL BE IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN OR BY THEENGINEER AND WILL BE PRESERVED BY THE CONTRACTOR.1.PLACE THE TEMPORARY FENCE.2.REDUCE SLOPE ROUNDING WHERE ROOT ZONESARE DISTURBED BY NORMAL SLOPE ROUNDING.3.VARY BACKSLOPE STEEPNESS TO AVOID TREELOSS OR UNNECESSARY ROOT DAMAGE.1. WHEN DESIGNATED IN THE PLAN OR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, ALL TREE ROOTS WILL BE CLEANLY CUT BY A VIBRATORY PLOW OR OTHER APPROVED ROOT CUTTER.2. THE TREE ROOTS WILL BE CUT CLEANLY TO THE MINIMUM DEPTH NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.3. IMMEDIALTLY, AND CLEANLY CUT DAMAGED AND EXPOSED ROOTS.4. ROOT ENDS EXPOSED BY EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY COVERED WITH A 6" LAYER OF ADJACENT SOIL.5. EXPOSED CUT OAK ROOTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY (WITHIN 5 MINUTES) TREATED WITH A WOUND DRESSING MATERIAL CONSISTING OF LATEX PAINT OR SHELLAC. C B 4'-6" 1.FABRICATE 12" X 9" X 3/8" SIGNWITH 0.75" RADIUS CORNERS.2.SIGN SHALL BE WHITE WITH BLACKLETTERING.3.ATTACH SIGN TO POST USING 1"LENGTH WOOD SCREWS.1.FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'SDRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TOANY CONSTRUCTION.2.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.3.PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 50'INTERVALS.2.PLACE A 6 INCH LAYER OF WOODCHIP MULCH OVER TYPEIII GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT 3733)K:\016591-000\Cad\Proposed\016591-000_L-SITE-PLANTING PLAN.dwg 9/1/2020 4:42:25 PM TOTSHEET OFSHEETSANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTACSAH 34 (Birch Street) ImprovementsAnoka County Highway DepartmentS.A.P. 002-634-003 & S.A.P. 210-020-010XTOTL1.5 WS – Item 2 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen Re: Lyngblomsten PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Background At the Work Session, staff will present the September 14, 2020 Council staff report. Requested Council Direction None, discussion only. Attachments 1. September 14, 2020 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: September 14, 2020 TOPIC: Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition i. Consider Resolution No. 20-94 approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-95 approving Development Agreement VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC has submitted a land use application for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat for development of Phase 1, the senior living community. Future PUD Final Plans/Final Plats will be required for development of the future commercial phases. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Revised PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Submittal (78 plan sheets) prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers, Loucks and AJA, Inc. revision date August 21, 2020 • PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Submittal (134 plan sheets) prepared by Wold, Loucks and AJA, Inc. revision date August 21, 2020 • SWPPP prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc. dated October 4, 2019 • Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Development Access (CSAH 49 and CR J) Option 1E prepared by SEH dated August 20, 2020 • Revised Storm Water Management Report, prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated July 13, 2020 • Design Guidelines prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers dated August 21, 2020 • Exterior Elevations prepared by Wold dated August 12, 2020 Previous Council Action • August 6, 2018: Council review of PUD Concept Plan • April 8, 2019: Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development o Details permitted, accessory, conditional and administrative uses specific to the 20 acre site 2 • April 8, 2019: Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat o Establishes development’s framework in regards to lot and yard requirements, height regulations, impervious surface and design guidelines • May 11, 2020: Resolution No. 20-44 approving PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan SUMMARY On June 10, 2020, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat and motioned to postpone recommendation to allow Lyngblomsten time to address some of the Boards concerns. On July 15, 2020, the Planning & Zoning Board held a special work session to review Lyngblomsten’s response. The following is a summary of discussion points from the June 10th, July 15th and August 12th meetings: Architecture and Exterior Elevations • Cottage Homes The Board requested an additional color scheme be added to the palette. A gray slate color was added for a total of 3 different color schemes (blue, sage and gray). • Senior Living Building The color palette was revised to include siding colors more similar to the original plan. The blue lap siding and white board 'n batten were applied differently to modify the overall exterior composition. A stone cap/ledge was better defined in the renderings between the stone and the siding to better differentiate between the materials. The heights of the parapets and main entrance were increased to provide more building variation and interest. The stone was removed from the exterior HVAC columns and utilized at grade to a minimum second floor height. There are no longer any (4) story elevations with siding only. The "eyebrow" elements are clad in the wood look fiberon product. The vertical signage at Gateway/Hodgson was removed from the East side (remains on North and will be internally lit at night). • Height The following is a summary of the senior building height comparisons: April 2019 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total May 2020 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total August 2020 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total Change (May 2020 to August 2020) 2 story-SC/MC 23’ + 2’ = 25’ 25’3”+ 2’11”=28’2” 25’3”+ 2’11”= 28’2” 0 3 story-AL 33’ + 4’ = 37’ 35’10”+1’5” = 37’3” 35’10” + 2’4” = 38’2” +0’11” 4 story-IL 43’ + 3’ = 46’ 46’6” + 2’6” = 49’0” 46’6” + 4’ 0” = 50’6” +1’ 6” Main Entrance 43’ + 5’ = 48’ 46’6” + 2’6” = 49’0” 50’6” + 1’ 8” = 52’ 2” +3’ 2” 3 • Building Footprint The building footprint increased 2,805 sf. The total floor area decreased 5,407 sf due to design development. The preliminary floor area calculations included potential rooftop patios and fourth floor pub with outdoor dining spaces. Building Footprint Total Floor Area Senior Living Building 76,713 79,518 sf 292,462 287,055 sf It should also be noted the first floor Town Center increased from 13,227 sf to 18,160 sf to house amenities from the omitted clubhouse. The clubhouse was programmed for 4,450 sf of amenity space. Future Development of Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot C The Board requested the future development of Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot C be required to be reviewed by the Planning& Zoning Board. This will be presented to the Council for consideration. Signs It is not uncommon for residential care facilities and multi-family building to have wall signs. The senior building proposes a vertical wall sign on north side of the building. The applicant has expressed a strong interest in “branding” the development. Monuments signs are also common features in campus settings such as Lyngblomsten. Trash and Service Areas The Woodridge neighborhood expressed concerns regarding the fact that the trash and services are not incorporated within the buildings as required in the Master Plan. • Commercial buildings must incorporate trash and service areas within the buildings rather than utilizing outdoor enclosures. This will conserve land and maximize the potential for outdoor seating and pedestrian friendly amenities. The general intent of any trash enclosure requirement is to screen dumpsters, recyclable materials, and necessary handling equipment from public view. The generator, trash compactor, and dumpsters are located at the bottom of the parking garage entry and loading dock approximately 7 ft below grade. Decorative fencing, coniferous trees, landscaping and senior living building will provide additional screening. The Master Plan specifically references “commercial buildings” with the intent to conserve land and maximize outdoor seating. The commercial buildings for the development are located near the intersection of CSAH 49 and CR J. The senior living building is a residential, independent living and care facility and would not be subject to this commercial building requirement. 4 The remainder of this is staff report is an update to the June 10, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board report and incorporates applicable revisions. BACKGROUND This staff report provides a comparison of the approved PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Changes in the plans are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). Overall, the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. General Site Plan Overview Lyngblomsten is proposing a 3 4 phased approach to redevelopment of 6 7 parcels totaling 20 acres located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). • Phase 1 is the senior living community consisting of the following housing options: Development Stage Plan (April 2019) Final Plan (May 2020) Difference Use # Units # Units # Units Cottage Homes 20 20 0 Senior Living Campus • Independent Living 100 96 -4 • Assisted-Living 50 35 -15 • Skilled Care 48 56 +8 • Memory Care 0 16 +16 TOTAL 218 223 +5 The market rate cottage homes are 1,400 sf 1,480 sf single level homes with 2 bedrooms and an attached 21’ x 21’ 20’ 10” x 20’ 10” garage. The houses include a 6 ft deep porch across the front of the house and a 10’ x 10’ patio in the rear. The senior living community independent and assisted-living units are market-rate and mid- range in price with a variety of 1- and 2-bedroom units and heated underground parking. Through final design, the number of units shifted between uses. Memory care units are now incorporated into the Assisted Living wing. The Skilled Nursing Facility is now referred to as Skilled Care and will be constructed in a future phase of development. As approved by Resolution No. 20-44, the clubhouse and associated parking lot have been omitted from the original plans in order to provide additional stormwater management. The amenities proposed with the clubhouse have now been incorporated into the Town Center of the main senior living building. The size of the first floor Town Center has increased from 10,200 13,227 sf to 18,185 18,160 sf to accommodate the amenities. • Phase 2 is a stand-alone 6,000 sf restaurant with outdoor patio • Phase 3 is future commercial development 5 • Phase 4 is the skilled care wing The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 6 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store, and recently demolished 49 Club. The development order of the future phases may vary. The development is accessed from CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) via an internal public road and two private roads. Zoning, Land Use and Density Current Zoning GB, General Business PUD, Planned Unit Development Current Land Use Rural Residential and Commercial 2030 Future Land Use Mixed Use (Master Planning Study- Hodgson Road and CR J) Density = 8-15 units per acre Proposed 2040 Future Land Use Signature Gateway District Density = 8-10 units per acre Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2008-2015) Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the site is guided mixed use and per the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan, it is guided Signature Gateway. The parcels have been rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J. The Master Plan covers approximately 60 acres of land on both the west and east sides of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent with the Master Plan. It assumed that approximately half of the 60 acre area would develop with residential uses at approximately 10 units per acre overall. The Comprehensive Plan identifies a density range from 8 to 15 units per acre for the Mixed Use District portion. The proposed development would have a net density of 9.36 8.09 units per acre on site, which is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan. Dev Stage Plan Final Plan Gross Area (acres) 20.47 21.02 Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.28) (0.28) Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW (1.79) (1.83) Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 0.00 6 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) (0.24) (0.24) Net Area (acres) 18.16 18.67 # of Units1 170 151 Gross Density (units/acre) 8.30 7.18 Net Density (units/acre) 9.36 8.09 1Per Met Council, skilled nursing facilities/units are not counted toward a community’s net residential density. 218 total units - 48 SNF =170 units. 223 total units – 56 SC-16 MC = 151 units Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve South Commercial (City of Shoreview) Commercial (City of Shoreview) Commercial (City of Shoreview) East GB General Business Commercial Mixed Use West R-1X, Single Family Executive Single Family Residential Low Density Residential Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J The development of this property is guided by the Master Planning Study-Hodgson Road & CR J (“Master Plan”), which was approved by the City Council in 2007 via Resolution No. 07-21. The Master Plan anticipated a mix of residential and commercial uses on the site, specifically noting that the mixed use district “would allow for, though not mandate, the inclusion of residential units, possibly in multi-story buildings. This would provide customers for the commercial development, and the commercial services would be convenient to the residents.” The Master Plan had four objectives: 1. Identify appropriate land uses (present and future) in the study area 2. Plan for road improvements to provide good access and circulation 3. Identify routing & phasing solutions for utilities to facilitate future development 4. Plan for redevelopment while recognizing existing businesses The Master Plan identifies planning and redevelopment requirements related to site configuration, transportation and access, trails and open space, municipal utilities, site design and urban form and stormwater management that should be incorporated into proposed developments. These requirements are detailed below. 7 Planning and Development Requirements (The following bullets and italicized text are requirements of the Master Plan. Staff comments follow in regular text.) General • This Master Plan is to be incorporated into the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan with an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes amendments to the Proposed Land Use Map: the area east of Hodgson Road should be designated Mixed Use instead of Commercial. Minor inconsistencies in the Proposed Land Use Map should be corrected as well, and zoning amendments should follow if and when appropriate. The Master Plan was adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and will also be incorporated into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • Rezoning as part of new development applications will be examined for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and this 49/J Master Plan. Per Ordinance No. 07-19, the site was rezoned from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Plan. • The Master Plan is the guiding plan for development in the area. The Master Plan is intended to show a general land use arrangement with some specific design elements. The individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process, but should be based on the Master Plan, including specific elements noted below. The Master Plan generally envisions townhome housing on the north and west portions of the site with a mix of residential and commercial uses on southern portions of the site. The Master Plan notes that “individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process”. The proposed Lyngblomsten senior living community proposes 20 cottage homes on the north end and a senior living campus on the eastern edge along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). Commercial development on the southern portion of the site includes a restaurant and future commercial pad that will be built out in the future. Additionally, this type of senior living campus does serve as an employment center for the staff. The City has previously treated assisted living facilities as commercial uses in both the Legacy development (Lino Lakes Assisted Living) and with Gracewood Assisted Living. • Tax increment financing and tax abatement on qualifying properties should be considered potential tools for implementing the Master Plan. The applicant has been approved for tax incremental financing to assist with the development of this project. Overall, the PUD Final Plan is consistent with the general goals of the Master Plan. 8 Transportation and Access • Accesses to Hodgson Road and Co. Rd. J are to be located at the points indicated on the Master Plan. The City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have been working together the with the applicant for the past 2+ years on right-of-way acquisition, access points and intersection improvements. Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection and preliminary concept plans provide for additional turn lanes to mitigate traffic. Both roads are County roads and ultimately fall under their jurisdiction. o There is to be one full access on Hodgson Road, located 990± ft north of the CR J intersection (approx. 330 ft south of the northern edge of the study area). This access is to be centered on the property line east of Hodgson at this location. No other new permanent accesses are to be allowed. As development occurs, the City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along Hodgson. Access to Hodgson Road is proposed at two locations: a full movement access approximately 1000 ft north of CR J that is consistent with the Master Plan and a right-in/right-out access approximately 440 ft north of CR J. This second access will improve circulation and accessibility to the site and is recommended by staff. The north access has a southbound 12 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and a varying width left turn striped median that provides access to 6064 & 6074 Hodgson Road (Rock Gardens). Northbound lanes include a 12 ft left turn lane, 12 ft wide thru lane and the existing right turn paved shoulder. The south access is Right In/Right Out only. It has a southbound 13 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and 12 ft wide left turn striped median that provides access to 6020 & 6034 Hodgson Road (Bob’s Auto Ranch). Northbound lanes include a 12 ft wide thru lane and existing right turn paved shoulder. o West of Hodgson Rd., there is to be one access onto CR J, located as far west as possible from the Hodgson/CR J intersection. This new access is to be constructed as right in/right out only. This will be a driveway into the development site, and there will be access easements on that site to provide access to, from, and through property to the north, leading to the full access on Hodgson. No other new accesses are to be allowed. The City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along CR J. As supported by Resolution No. 19-42, Lyngblomsten acquired the 0.54 acre parcel to the west of their project (275 Ash Street) and has shifted Gateway Drive to the west approximately 50 ft to align with St. Albans Street to the south. Gateway Drive is now approximately 400 ft to the west of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). This provides greater access spacing along CR J (Ash Street) and reduces the previous road off-set between Gateway Drive and St. Albans Street. 9 This intersection access has a westbound 13 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and 10 ft striped median. Eastbound has a 12 ft wide left turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane, and 6 ft wide paved shoulder. The City of Shoreview has expressed concerns regarding cut through traffic south onto St. Albans Street. Currently, there are times when eastbound traffic on CR J turns right onto St. Albans St. to avoid backups at the main CR J & CSAH 49 intersection due to the lack of a dedicated southbound right turn lane onto Hodgson Road. The proposed SEH intersection improvements provide a 12 ft wide right turn lane, 12 ft wide thru lane and 12 ft wide left turn lane at the intersection. These changes will improve traffic circulation through the intersection and minimize the need for cut through traffic. The City of Shoreview is also requesting the intersection at CR J and St. Albans be a ¾ intersection. This would be supported by Lino Lakes and Anoka County staff. • The access points, right of way, and internal circulation routes noted above are to create a circulation network serving all properties in the study area rather than individual driveways onto arterial and collector roads that serve only individual properties. A public road will extend north-south through the development providing public access to the senior housing complex, restaurant and future commercial development. The road right-of-way is 60 ft wide and the paved road surface is 32 ft back to back. Sidewalk is proposed on both sides of the public road on the north end and on the east side toward the south end closest to the development. On-street parking will be allowed on both sides. A 26 foot wide private road will serve the cottage home neighborhood. Sidewalk is proposed on the south side and will connect to the public road sidewalks. Two parking areas with a total of 11 parking stalls are provided on the west and east ends of the private road for visitors. No parking will be allowed on the private road. The east end cul de sac was flipped to the south to provide more separation between some of the cottage homes. The southerly right in/right out access off of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) will also be a commercial private road. The paved road surface has been reduced from 32 to 26 ft wide back to back. Both private roads will be owned and maintained by the developer. • The Hodgson/CR J intersection is to be signalized prior to or as part of any significant development in the study area. This is to be a cooperative effort of Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers. Specific design requirements are to be determined. Signals were installed at the intersection in 2008 and modified in 2017. • Other road improvement needs such as additional lanes, median, and the like will be designed in cooperation with Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers, as appropriate. Specific design requirements are to be determined. 10 Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection. The proposed improvements have been noted above. Anoka County Highway Department is proposing to be the lead agency on design and letting of the CSAH 49 and CR J road and intersection reconstruction project. Cost sharing details between the entities will be finalized when estimates are complete. Potential road reconstruction will be in 2022 to coincide with the Lyngblomsten development. • The quantity of development of the area will be limited to ensure that traffic generation does not exceed the capacities of Hodgson Road, the intersection with Co Rd J, or the new access. Development shall not create the need for a traffic signal at the new full access on Hodgson Road. o Planning for the area must look forward to full development of the study area so as not to allow one project to “use up capacity” so that other sites cannot develop without creating the need for a signal at the new access. As noted, a traffic analysis was completed for the development. Peak trip generation from the proposed development is approximately 1/3 of the trip generation provided for in the Master Plan. No signal is proposed at the new full access. • Right of way will be dedicated with development to ensure adequate right of way for Hodgson and CR J as well as for the internal circulation system, as necessary. The final plat dedicates additional right-of-way ranging from 27 ft to 45 ft along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) creating 60 ft to 75 ft of dedicated right-of-way from section line and/or roadway centerline. The final plat also dedicates an additional 10-17 ft of right-of-way along CR J (Ash Street) to provide a full 60 ft from section line. The internal public road is dedicated with 60 ft of right-of-way. Overall, the proposed development is consistent with the Transportation and Access goals of the Master Plan. Trails, Open Space • A trail connection, included as an ‘enhancement corridor’ in the Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan, will be established across the study area. This will link to the existing trail connection to Woodridge Lane on the west, cross through the study area, and link to a future trail in Ware Road. The specific alignment of this trail corridor across the Master Plan area will be determined as development occurs. The Lyngblomsten site plan includes an 8.5 foot wide bituminous trail that extends from the existing Woodridge Lane trail to the private cottage home road then to an 8.5 ft wide trail along 11 the full length of Hodgson Road. The trail corridor originally connected to the clubhouse and between the cottage homes, but this has been revised when the clubhouse was omitted. An 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail will also be constructed along CRJ/Ash Street and ultimately connect to Woodridge Lane. Sidewalks internal to the development along the public and private roads will also be constructed to provide additional connectivity. • An, open, focal point green space is to be created where the Woodridge Lane trail connection enters the study area. The specific design of this focal point will be reviewed with any development application for the site. The original concept site plan included a community garden and lilac trees adjacent to the wetland that created an open, focal point green space in this location. Due to the need for additional storm water management, the community garden has been replaced by a stormwater pond. The pond and landscaping still creates an open, focal green space as required. The cottage home neighborhood also includes 4.54 acres (71%) 4.46 acres (70%) of landscaped common open space that will be maintained by Lyngblomsten or an association. • A trail should be constructed along Hodgson Road in accordance with the City’s parks and trails plan. This could be accomplished with sidewalks in the study area. An 9 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail is proposed along the full length of Hodgson Road. Sidewalks are also proposed along the public and private roads. • Greenspace buffering is an important design element for new development along the border with existing neighborhoods such as Woodridge Estates and Rohavic Oaks. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. The property owner at 253 Woodridge Lane noted the buffer behind his parcel tapers from 40 ft to 6 ft. After grading and installation of road improvements, staff and the developer will work with the property owners of 251 and 253 Woodridge to provide acceptable landscape and fence screening from the private commercial road. A triangulated row of coniferous trees will be planted on the west side of Gateway Drive along the rear lot lines of 255 Woodridge Lane and 255 Ash Street to provide screening from the commercial road. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the dry stormwater pond. An existing row of 12’+ tall pine trees will be preserved at the west end of the cottage home private cul de sac as well as additional coniferous trees. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 ft. The landscape plans have been revised to include a 6 foot high wood privacy fence along the lot line. Trees and landscaping are also proposed in the 30 foot buffer. 12 A 40 foot wide berm and landscape buffer is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. Municipal Utilities • All new development must have sanitary sewer and water service. Possible exceptions prior to the availability of utilities include renovation of existing structures if the building code allows it without utilities. However, the preference is for all uses in the study area to have municipal utilities. The entire Lyngblomsten senior living community, cottage homes, restaurant and commercial development will be served by municipal utilities. • Several options exist for utility service, as described in this study document. West of Hodgson, the preference is for connection to the Woodridge Lane sanitary sewer. City watermain and sanitary sewer force main will be extended from Woodridge Lane through a 20 foot wide utility easement obtained by the City over 255 Ash Street, 275 Ash Street (now owned by Lyngblomsten) and a portion of the old 49 Club. A lift station is also being constructed. A 12” watermain extends down the public road and 8” watermain serves the cottage homes, senior living community and commercial areas. The 4” sanitary sewer has been revised to an 8” sanitary sewer main to service the area. Utilities will be stubbed under CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) to serve future development to the east. • Water trunk lines must be looped, and development must provide the looping. Watermain will be extended north along Hodgson Road to connect and loop at Linda Avenue as part of a City trunk watermain project. The watermain is also looped around the senior living campus. Site Design, Urban Form • The intent is to create an urban form for the area. The main senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building have been intentionally pulled towards Hodgson Road and CR J for multiple reasons. One is to create an edge and urban form along the corridor as required by the Master Plan. Two, the building locations were also in response to the Woodridge and Rohavic Oaks neighborhood’s concern regarding proximity of the buildings, noise, buffers etc. to their homes. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the north and west to the 2-story skilled care wing with the 3- and 4-story buildings closest to Hodgson Road. Three, the building shift also maximizes site design and efficiency. 13 The senior living campus setback tapers from 30.97 ft to 26 33.68 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. The restaurant setback tapers from 35 ft to 15 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. The commercial building and fast food setback is 11 35 ft from the Hodgson Road property line and 30 35 ft from the Ash Street property line. These building locations and setbacks are consistent with the Master Plan. • Development layouts are to include buildings at intersection corners to establish the “cornerstones” of the area’s urban form. The main senior living campus at the southwest corner of Hodgson Road and the future public road creates a corner stone at that intersection. A Lyngblomsten monument sign at the north side of the public road also creates a strong corner. The future commercial building at the Hodgson Road and CR J intersection is also consistent with the Master Plan’s gateway and cornerstone vision by providing the space for a community entrance sign and promenade. • As another means of pursuing an urban form, development is to avoid lining Hodgson with large parking lots. This could include the following elements. o Buildings fronting along Hodgson in addition to the cornerstone buildings o Extensive landscaping and screening of parking lots will be required along Hodgson and CR J, including boulevard trees and decorative fencing or walls. Landscaping must be included on the street side of fences or walls along parking lots. The parking lots for the senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building are internal to the development and not located along Hodgson Road and CR J. They are setback a minimum of 15 ft from the internal public road property line. One larger parking lot with joint parking facilities and cross easements is encouraged has been created between Phase 2 (restaurant) and Phase 3 (commercial building). • Larger parking areas should be planned with internal landscaping, pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible: o Pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a commercial building; o Walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel on the route to an entrance of a commercial building. The senior living parking lot includes landscaped islands and the perimeter along the public road is landscaped and screened with shrubs and trees. The sidewalk along the public road 14 connects to a sidewalk leading to the main building for pedestrian connectivity. Future development of the restaurant and commercial building will require similar connections. • Sidewalks are to be constructed on both sides of Hodgson Road and on the north side of Co. Rd. J to form connections to the trails to the development areas and contribute to the urban form of the area. An 9 8.5 foot wide path is being constructed along the west side of Hodgson Road. A trail and/or sidewalk will be required on the east side of Hodgson Road when that area develops. A trail and/or decorative sidewalk will also be constructed along CR J in conjunction with development of the commercial building. in the first phase of development. Upon development of the commercial building and corner gateway, decorative sidewalk may be incorporated into the design in conjunction with the trail. • Pedestrian circulation should be an important design factor within the development areas to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle circulation among businesses and residential sites. Such circulation routes must be safe and aesthetically pleasing. Safe pedestrian corridors are provided throughout the development between the residential and commercial uses via trails and sidewalks. • Design guidelines must be prepared for any new development project in the area. Developers should submit draft guidelines with development applications. Design guidelines for each project must include attention to previous projects in order to coordinate design throughout the study area. After being refined in collaboration with City staff, design requirements shall be incorporated into the approval of the development. Design Guidelines will be have been prepared with the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Overall development shall be is consistent with the Master Plan. As a starting point, the Lyngblomsten site plan shall has been used to establish the building and parking lot setbacks (i.e. the building envelope). Resolution No. 19-42 details the building and parking setbacks. Other parameters that shall be included in the Design Guidelines include: • Gateway Elements o The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Such elements may include:  Community Entrance Sign with City Logo  Promenade with seating, public space, decorative pavers or stamped concrete and extensive landscaping  Public art • Architectural Standards • Building Heights o To the greatest extent possible, building heights shall be tiered from lowest to highest, west to east towards Hodgson Road. • Master Landscape Plan 15 • Master Signage Plan • Buildings must be designed with “four-sided architecture”, using the same quality materials on all sides. o All facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other details to add visual interest. o Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of the building. o Roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible o The front façade may have a unique design or more significant glazing. There have been some changes to exterior materials and design of the senior building; however, the final design meets the Master Plan criteria and is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plans. The senior living campus still incorporates “four-sided architecture”. All sides of the building include the same quality stone/masonry, metal and horizontal and vertical composite siding and glass. A “wood” composite siding has also been incorporated into the design. A stone ledge cornice element was added between the stone and the siding to better differentiate between the materials. The building layout was designed to limit blank walls facing the street. The separate wings of the building help to break up the massing as well as transition intensity from west to east on the site. The cottage home front façade includes a front porch, recessed garage, stone base and composite LP Smartside siding. More architectural detail is provided further in the staff report. Detailed site and building plan review will be required upon development of the restaurant and commercial building. • Commercial buildings must incorporate trash and service areas within the buildings rather than utilizing outdoor enclosures. This will conserve land and maximize the potential for outdoor seating and pedestrian friendly amenities. The original architectural site plan indicated a detached 15’ x 20’ x 8’ trash enclosure structure on the south end of the senior building. The plans have been revised and all trash and service areas are now contained in the building. The generator, trash compactor and dumpsters are now located at the bottom of the parking garage entry and loading dock approximately 7 ft below grade. Decorative fencing and coniferous trees will provide additional screening. 16 The Master Plan specifically references “commercial buildings” with the intent to conserve land and maximize outdoor seating. The commercial buildings for the development are located near the intersection of CSAH 49 and CR J. The senior living building is a residential independent living and care facility and would not be subject to this requirement. • It is not the intent of this plan to specify housing unit styles. However, garage units must not access directly onto the main access drive or the main public streets through the development. The cottage homes garages access onto a 26 foot wide private drive not the main public street. • The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Future development of the commercial corner will require these gateway elements. • The interface between new residential and commercial uses should be flexible. For example, new development in central areas can be multi-family, commercial, or mixed use. This would be consistent with the flexible land use lines noted above. Maintaining safety and quality of life are important considerations. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the west and north to the 2-story skilled care wing with the 3- and 4-story assisted-living and independent living wings closest to Hodgson Road. Intensity of development transitions from low near the existing single family neighborhood to high near the intersection. The senior living complex is also an employment center. • Lighting is to be appropriately scaled to a pedestrian friendly development. Lighting should be directed downward and screened to reduce light pollution, glare, and impacts on adjacent residential areas. Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex. Street lights ranging from 12 to 28 25 foot in height with down lit shields will be utilized in the parking lot and near the main entrance and loading area. Foot candles do not exceed 1.0 fc onto right-of-way as required by City performance standards. Two Five 15 25 foot pole street lights with down lit shields are proposed along the private road and parking areas in the cottage home neighborhood. The photometric plan indicates zero (0) foot candle levels protruding onto adjacent residential properties as required. The applicant shall work with the local electric company to design a street lighting plan for the public road. • Security or service lighting should be limited in coverage area and designed to reduce glare. Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex and clubhouse. 17 Stormwater Management • Stormwater management design must incorporate filtration and infiltration elements. This could include such features as rain gardens, swales, dry creeks, infiltration chambers, and other ecologically based methods along with more traditional ponds and pipes. • Stormwater management ponds, if used, should be designed to be a site amenity, including appropriate landscape elements. Per the revised Storm Water Management Report prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated March 11, 2019, May 8, 2020 July 13, 2020, rate control is being accomplished using a combination of a dry pond and a storm water treatment pond. The dry pond is now located where the original community gardens were proposed. The proposed rate is less than 80% of the existing rate of runoff. Water quality treatment is accomplished at the single stormwater treatment pond. True infiltration was considered during the design phase, but several factors contributed to not pursuing infiltration practices. First, shallow groundwater exists on site. According to the soil borings, groundwater is in the 895 to 897 elevation range. A majority of the low points are around elevation 905 with one parking lot having a low point of about 902.5. This would mean the surface of an infiltration area would need to be at elevation 900 - 901 for effective drainage to occur. Additionally, the site has been maximized and there is not adequate space for effective infiltration practices. Instead, a stormwater pond has been constructed. The stormwater pond, in addition to providing rate control, has been sized to provide adequate dead storage below the normal water level to meet water quality requirements. Finally, an irrigation pumping station will be constructed at the stormwater pond to draw water from the pond to irrigate the surrounding areas. As detailed in the May 11, 2020 Council staff report and Resolution No. 22-44 approving PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1 to the site plan and grading & drainage plan, the clubhouse was omitted in order to enlarge to the stormwater pond to provide more capacity. Pond Size Comparison Original Pond 3P Enlarged Pond 3P Surface Area 0.56 acres 0.82 acres Volume 2.810 acre ft 3.869 acre ft RCWD issued an amended Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) on March 13, 2020. The District Engineer finds the revised grading and stormwater management plans compliant with RCWD rules. The City’s stormwater management ordinance requires 4 ft of separation between low floor freeboard and groundwater. In order to minimize the site being built up to meet this 18 requirement, this separation distance may be reduced upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that potential ground water inflow will be adequately mitigated. Said mitigation shall be approved by the City Engineer. As supported by Resolution No. 19-42, Braun Intertec submitted a Sub-Slab Drainage System Design. The drainage system will mitigate potential future groundwater infiltration into the lowest level of the senior building. The plan is being reviewed by the City Engineer and Building Official. The clubhouse has been strategically located adjacent to the landscaped stormwater pond as a site amenity. The clubhouse has been omitted from the project. Additional Site Plan Review Building Footprints and Floor Areas A summary of the building footprints and square footages is as follows: Building Footprint Total Floor Area Cottage Homes 1,400 1,480 sf 1,400 1,480sf Clubhouse 3,400 sf Omitted 4,609 sf Omitted Senior Living Building 76,713 79,518 sf 292,462 287,055 sf Future Restaurant1 6,000 sf 6,000 sf Future Commercial1 16,000 sf 16,000 sf Future Fast Food1 2,000 sf 2,000 sf 1These building footprints and total square footages may change upon final design. Setbacks Cottage Home Neighborhood The cottage home neighborhood consists of 20 single family homes accessed via a 26 foot wide private road. A 5 foot wide sidewalk is shown on the south side of the road. The houses on the north side of the road are setback 23 ft from the curb, 30 ft from the north Rohavic Oaks property line and 40 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. Houses on the south side of the road that have sidewalks are setback 23 ft from the sidewalk. The 23 foot setback allows for the parking of 2 vehicles side by side in the driveway without encroaching into the road or sidewalk. The rear setback of these houses is 25 ft to the public road right-of-way line. It should be noted that during the PUD Development Stage Plan review, the 23 ft setback was measured to the garage, not the house. The cottage homes have a 3 ft recessed garage and a 6 ft deep porch on the front. The front porch shall be at least 14 ft behind either the curb or sidewalk, whichever is closer (23 ft garage – 3 ft house bump out – 6 ft deep porch = 14 ft). 19 It should also be noted the rear patios are at grade concrete slabs and may encroach into the rear setback. This is similar to a single family accessory structure deck or patio. There shall be is a minimum of 10 ft of separation between each house. Each lot is platted to include the building footprint (including front porch and rear patio) plus a 5 foot envelope around the footprint perimeter. The preliminary plat includes a Cottage Detail. Clubhouse The clubhouse is setback 30 ft from the public road right-of-way line and is 40 ft from the nearest adjacent cottage home. The parking lot is setback 16 ft from the public road right-of- way line and is 15 ft from the nearest adjacent cottage home. A coniferous landscape screen is provided between the clubhouse, parking lot and adjacent cottage homes. Additional screening or fence has been added near Lot 16 as requested. As discussed, the clubhouse has been omitted in order to enlarge the stormwater pond to create more storage. Senior Living Campus As previously discussed, the setbacks along Hodgson Road and CR J are driven by the Master Plan’s intent to create an urban form for the area. The senior living campus setback varies from 30.97 ft to 26.74 33.68 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. Along the northern boundary of the lot, the building corner is 12 11.53ft from the property line and increases to 45 ft. Along the western boundary, the building corner is also 12 14.41ft from the property line and increases to 45 ft. Along the south boundary, the building setback is 20 ft from the paved private road and 6 ft from the sidewalk. The parking lot is setback 15 ft from the property line. Restaurant and Commercial Development As discussed, full site and building plan review will be required for development of the restaurant and commercial buildings. Per the proposed site plan for Phase 2 and 3, the restaurant setback tapers from 35 ft to 15 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. An outdoor patio is shown adjacent to the property line and 5-10 ft from the paved trail. The commercial building setback is 11 35 ft from the Hodgson Road property line and 30 35 ft from the Ash Street property line. On the PUD Final Plans, a fast food restaurant with a drive-through is shown to the west of the commercial pad. Per Ordinance No. 07-19, restaurants are allowed uses; however, accessory drive-through facilities require a conditional use permit. A full site and building plan review are required that meet all performance standards of the ordinance, 49/J Master Plan and Design Standards. Architecture 20 Detailed architectural comments were provided by Landform and City staff. The following is a summary. Overall, the proposed development upholds architectural standards envisioned by the Master Plan and is consistent with zoning ordinance performance standards. Cottage Homes The 2 bedroom, single level cottage homes are 18 20 ft in height (24 ft to roof peak). The floor area is 1,400 1,480sf. Exterior materials include a stone/masonry manufactured stone base, glass, composite LP Smartside siding and 4” trim, decorative garage door and decorative louver. The 21’x 21’ 20’10” x 20’10” garage is recessed 2.6 ft behind the front façade. The color palette includes 2 3 primary colors, evening blue, mountain sage and gray and an accent color of cobble stone. The Design Standards include an anti-monotony plan. The front porch has been revised to 6 ft deep and the rear patio has been revised to 10’ x 10’as required. Detailed building plans have been provided with PUD Final Plan. Clubhouse The 2 level clubhouse is 31 ft at the highest peak of the unique roofline. Exterior materials include stone/masonry, metal siding, glass and composite siding. Glass makes up the highest percentage of materials. As discussed, the clubhouse has been omitted in order to enlarge the stormwater pond to create more storage. Senior Living Complex In order to address revisions in final building design, structural details and floorplan layout, there have been some changes to exterior elevations, materials and height; however, the final design meets the Master Plan criteria and is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plans. The multi-storied complex has varying heights that tier from the 2-story skilled care wing to the 3-story assisted-living wing to the 4-story independent living wing. Decorative parapets accent the rooflines. In order to achieve desired 9 ft ceilings, the building height (top of wall) has increased 3 ft. 6 in in the independent living wing. The parapet heights were decreased also increased. The finished floor elevation (FFE) of the first floor (Level 1) is 910.5 EL and that has not changed. Below is a comparison of the preliminary and final building and parapet heights: Building Height Comparison April 2019 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total May 2020 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total August 2020 Top of Wall + Parapet = Total Change (May 2020 to August 2020) 2 story-SC/MC 23’ + 2’ = 25’ 25’3”+ 2’11”=28’2” 25’3”+ 2’11”= 28’2” 0 3 story-AL 33’ + 4’ = 37’ 35’10”+1’5” = 37’3” 35’10” + 2’4” = 38’2” +0’11” 21 4 story-IL 43’ + 3’ = 46’ 46’6” + 2’6” = 49’0” 46’6” + 4’ 0” = 50’6” +1’ 6” Main Entrance 43’ + 5’ = 48’ 46’6” + 2’6” = 49’0” 50’6” + 1’ 8” = 52’ 2” +3’ 2” Per Resolution No. 19-42, Section III. Height Regulations: B. Senior Living Campus No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty-five (45) ft in height—or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4) stories or forty-five (45) ft—except as allowed by §1007.043 (3). Section 1007.043 (3) allows for parapet walls extending not more than four (4) ft above the limiting height of the building. The 4 story building height (top of wall) is 46’ 6” plus 2’ 6” 4’0” parapet equals 49’ 0” 50’6”. In summary, the building and parapet heights meet the requirements of both the zoning ordinance and Resolution No. 19-42. Exterior materials have been revised from stone/masonry, metal siding, glass and composite siding to manufactured stone veneer, fiber cement siding (2 colors), wood look fiber cement siding and glass. More specifically as detailed in the Design Guidelines: • Manufactured Stone Veneer o Ohio Blue Vein Cut Stone • Hardieplank Siding o Evening Blue o Artic White • Fiberon Siding (wood look) o Warm Sienna Ipe • Black window frame, dark bronze storefront, metal parapet cap The blue horizontal siding and white vertical siding provide contrast and the wood horizontal siding provides a natural look. Articulation and depth in the buildings elevations is achieved with vertical bump outs, shadow lines, cornices and decorative parapets. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 33% of the exterior walls have an exterior finish of brick, stucco or stone. The elevations include stone/masonry manufactured stone veneer of ranging from 38-43%, 38.6% 35.2% 36.2% which exceeds ordinance requirements. The building has multiple façades, varying exteriors materials, textures and strong vertical and horizontal lines that provide articulation and depth and break up what could be long monotonous walls. Parking The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum number of parking stalls per use, as follows: 22 • Townhome, Quadraminium, Manor Home, Multiple Family Dwellings, and Mobile Homes within Mobile Home Parks. At least two and one-fourth (2-1/4) rent-free spaces per unit. In projects involving eight (8) or more units, the City may require additional clustered guest parking spaces based upon calculation of required demand. The cottage home neighborhood is served by a 26 foot wide private road with no on-street parking; therefore, off-street parking has been provided. The 20 cottage homes require 45 parking stalls. Each cottage home has parking for 4 vehicles (2 in the garage and 2 in the driveway) for a total of 80 parking stalls. Two off-street guest parking areas also provide an additional 11 parking stalls for a total of 91 parking stalls. The clubhouse requires 14 parking stalls and 14 are provided with 2 of them accessible. Parking requirements for the cottage home and clubhouse neighborhoods are met. • Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. There are 100 96 independent living units that would require 100 96 parking stalls. • Rest Home, Nursing Home, Convalescent Center, or Institution. One (1) space for each six (6) beds based upon maximum design capacity, plus one (1) space for each two (2) employees. There are 50 35 assisted-living beds, 48 56 skilled care beds, 16 memory care beds and 35 employees that would require 35 parking stalls. The Town Center common use area is 7,521 18,185 14,596sf. If this were a stand-alone community center, 48 parking stalls would be required. However, these amenities will be used mostly by the Lyngblomsten residents and on occasion, members of the general public; therefore 48 separate parking stalls dedicated to just the Town Center would not be required. The total required number of parking stalls for the senior campus building is 131. There are 159 stalls provided. Assuming 50% general public use of the Town Center amenities at one time (48/2=24), only 155 stalls would be required. Parking requirements are met. Senior Living Campus Parking Stall Summary Use # Stalls Required # Stalls Provided Elderly Housing (IL units) 96 82 (underground) Nursing Home (AL + SC +MC) 35 77 (surface lot) Subtotal 131 159 Town Center (50%) 24 TOTAL 155 159 23 • Restaurants, Cafes, Private Clubs Serving Food and/or Drinks, Bars, On-Sale Nightclubs. Ten (10) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square ft of dining room, plus one (1) space for each employee of the maximum work shift. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the dining room square footage; however, assuming a 6,000 sf restaurant has 3,000 sf of dining room + 10 employees, 40 parking stalls would be required. The proposed 1,200 sf outdoor dining patio would require an additional 7 stalls for a total of 47 parking stalls. • Retail Store and Service Establishment. At least one (1) off-street parking space for each two hundred (200) square ft of floor area. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the floor area of the proposed commercial building; however, the commercial pad as shown is approximately 16,000 sf and 72 parking stalls would be required. • Fast Food Restaurant. Fifteen (15) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square ft of gross floor area. The final plan now includes a potential 2,000 sf fast food restaurant that would require 30 stalls. Future Commercial Development Parking Stall Summary Use # Stalls Required # Stalls Provided Restaurant (6,000 sf + 1,200 patio) 47 48 (joint) Retail (16,000 sf) 72 59 (joint) Fast Food (2,000 sf) 30 46 (joint) TOTAL 149 153 The total number of required stalls is 149. The final plan shows 153 stalls. Joint parking facilities with shared curb cuts and access drives have been provided between the restaurant, commercial building and fast food restaurant. Tree Preservation Plan Per the Tree Survey (Sheets 1-2), there are 1,685 significant trees located on the 20 acre site. Sheet L0.1, Tree Preservation Plan identifies the basic use area. Of the 1,685 significant trees, 201 will be preserved and 1,484 will be removed. The majority of the trees being preserved are along the west boundary providing a tree buffer between the Woodridge neighborhood and the development. The Tree Preservation Plan has been revised to exclude the stormwater pond and wetland buffer from the basic use area. 24 There are 137 152 trees being removed in non-environmentally sensitive areas that require 213 trees for mitigation. Trees being removed within the wetland buffer shall be mitigated at the Natural Resource Conservation Area ratio. The Tree Mitigation table shall be has been revised. There are 32 trees in a Natural Resource Conservation Area or Natural Resource Corridor Enhancement area that will require 67 mitigation trees. In summary, 280 (213 + 67) mitigation trees are required and 376 mitigation trees are being planted. Tree Preservation and Mitigation requirements are met. Landscaping Canopy Cover Canopy Cover standards require the minimum canopy cover to be 40% for all uses. Canopy cover is required for the senior living campus, clubhouse, restaurant and commercial development. The restaurant and commercial development will be reviewed upon submission of detailed plans. The senior living campus has 42,956 sf of hardcover which requires 17,182 sf of canopy coverage. 17,900 sf have been provided. The original Plan Sheet L2.1 indicated 17,450 sf of coverage provided; however, the medium trees were incorrectly valued at 500 and not 250. The values have been corrected. Plan Sheet L2.1 indicates 17,450 sf of coverage provided which meets the requirement. The club house has 5,866 sf of hardcover which requires 2,346 sf of canopy coverage. Plan Sheet L2.5 has been revised and now provides 4,100 sf. Coverage is met for the clubhouse. Foundation Landscaping Foundation Landscaping standards require 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs per 100 linear ft of the building. The senior living campus has 1,981 linear ft of building façade requiring 40 large trees and 119 large shrubs. The landscape plan proposes 63 large tree equivalents and 304 large shrub equivalents which exceed requirements 42 large trees equivalents and 387 large shrub equivalents. The landscape plan also provides for several outdoor landscaped courtyards. The trees along Hodgson Road have been relocated out of the road right-of-way and within 30 ft of the building. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas include disturbed site areas, such as cul de sac islands, boulevard medians, storm water management areas, common areas in multifamily sites that are not for recreation facilities, and disturbed areas that are not located within the foundation landscape zone, vehicular hardscape area or the building footprint. Open Space landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 square ft. Open space plantings are required for the main building, stormwater ponds, and north and south green spaces. 25 Per Sheet L2.1 and L2.3 L2.2, Main Building, there is 45,374 45,063 square ft of open space. This would require 23 large trees and 69 large shrubs. The plan proposes 36 large tree equivalents and 155 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met and exceeded. The Clubhouse, per sheet L2.5, has 11,525 square ft of open space. This would require 6 large trees and 17 large shrubs. The plan proposes 16 large tree equivalents and 34 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met and exceeded. The North East and North West Green Spaces, found on Sheet L2.6, hosts 19,895 23,000 square ft and 54,073 square ft, respectively. The North East Greenspace requires 10 12 large trees and 30 36 large shrubs to meet the open space landscaping standards. The North West Greenspace requires 27 large trees and 80 large shrubs. The landscaping plan provides 18 12 large tree equivalents and 87 48 large shrubs equivalents for the North East Green space and 27 large tree equivalents and 80 large shrubs equivalents for the North West Green Space, which meets the open space requirements. Per Sheet L2.7, there is 51,926 84,699 square ft of open space in the South West Greenspace. This would require 26 43 large trees and 78 127 large shrubs. The plan proposes 205 202 large tree equivalents and 101 230 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met; however the plan sheet notes 28 trees and 84 shrubs are required. This shall be corrected. In addition to meeting the open space requirements, the developer is including three extensively landscaped courtyard areas around the senior housing building for the enjoyment of the residents. Buffer and Screen Standards Buffer and Screen Standards require a 6 foot high screen between a development and any adjacent, less intense, residential land use. Materials to meet this ordinance can include year round continuous planting screen, a wall or fence and plantings which cover 50% of a wall or fence on the exterior side, or a combination of berm and year round continuous screening. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the stormwater pond. Additional landscape screening shall be planted in the area adjacent to 253 and 255 Woodridge Lane to provide more screening from the road and parking lots. The public road right-of-way near CR J has shifted to the east approximately 10-40 ft. Gateway Drive has shifted to the west approximately 50 ft to align with St. Albans Street to the south. This will allow for additional landscape buffer and allow the existing spruce tree line adjacent to 275 Ash Street to be preserved. A triangulated row of coniferous trees will be planted along the east lot line of 275 Ash Street. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 ft and a 6 foot high wood privacy fence will be located along the north lot line. A 40 foot wide buffer with a 3 foot berm and landscape plantings is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. 26 A 30 inch shrub hedge is proposed between the senior living campus parking lot and public road right-of-way as is required by ordinance. A 3 foot berm is located on the north side of the northeast private cottage home parking area. Coniferous trees and shrubs are planted along the top of the berm. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per 70 linear ft of road frontage where property fronts on any public roads for townhome or multiple family homes. There are 20 cottage homes abutting 700 linear ft. This would require 10 boulevard trees. The cottage home private road has 33 boulevard trees which exceed ordinance requirements. There is 2,080 linear ft of public road (Street A) that abuts the senior living campus and future restaurant and commercial. This would require 30 boulevard trees. There are 33 boulevard trees proposed which exceeds ordinance requirements. There is 789 linear ft of private road (Street B) that would require 11 boulevard trees. There are 13 boulevard trees proposed which exceeds ordinance requirements. Sheet L2.0 shall include the entire 20 acre parcels and revised calculations. The 20 Cottage homes have 1,869 linear ft of frontage. This would require 27 boulevard trees and 35 boulevard trees are provided. Gateway Drive (Street A) has 2,750 linear ft of frontage. This would require 37 boulevard trees and 41 trees have been provided. The private commercial street (Street B) has 789 linear ft of frontage. This would require 11 boulevard trees and 13 trees have been provided. The landscape plan has been revised so trees are not located within the Hodgson Road right-of- way; however, Sheet L2.1 shall be revised so coniferous trees are at least 15 ft from the trail and deciduous trees are at least 10 ft from the trail. Boulevard tree requirements have been met. Signage Sheet L2.6, NE Greenspace Plan indicates an entrance monument sign on the north side of the public road. The sign area is landscaped and it outside of the 100 foot vision triangle. Sheet A17, Signage Exterior A5.708 provides detail of a monument sign. The sign is 6’4” 10’4” high and 25 20’ 6” ft long. Materials include sandblasted concrete and stone stone veneer base, metal “boy blue” face and metal coping to match the senior building color and material palette. A separate Sign Permit Application is required for all wall signs and monument signs. The senior building proposes a vertical wall sign on north side of the building. The applicant has expressed a strong interest in “branding” the development. A master sign plan for the 20 acre site is required and shall be has been incorporated into the Design Standards. This master sign plan should include a City of Lino Lakes gateway sign/monument at the intersection of Hodgson Road and CR J. 27 Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage in a mixed use area is 75%. The proposed 49.6% post-development impervious surface coverage is compliant. Per the March 11, 2019 May 8, 2020 Storm Water Management Plan: Pre-Development Post-Development Impervious 1.93 acres (0.09%) 2.67 acres (10.5%) 11.51 acres (56%) 12.54 acres (49.6%) Pervious 18.80 acres (99.91%) 22.62 acres (89.5%) 9.22 acres (44%) 12.75 acres (50.4%) TOTAL AREA 20.73 acres (100%) 25.29 acres (100%) 20.73 acres (100%) 25.29 acres (100%) Traffic Study No changes are required to the traffic study. The proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,473 daily trips. 69 trips are estimated to be generated in the AM peak period (7:00 to 8:00) and 123 trips in the PM peak (4:30 to 5:30). A detailed traffic analysis was completed to describe the operating conditions of intersections surrounding the site in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions). A Level of Service “D” represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection conditions during a peak hour. City Code establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The Code states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision will not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D it will not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. The traffic analysis evaluated four surrounding intersections adjacent to the project area. • Co Rd J at Woodbridge Ln • Co Rd J at St. Albans St • Co Rd J at Hodgson Rd • Hodgson Rd at Rohavic Ln As discussed in the WSB Transportation Memorandum, dated February 6, 2019, all intersections, meet the City Code requirements. However, it was noted that the worst movement at the CR J and Hodgson intersection, during the PM peak period, changed from a 28 LOS D to LOS E. The proposed southbound Hodgson Road right turn lane, at CR J adequately mitigates for this degradation. Additionally, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have been working together the with the applicant or the past 2+ years on right-of-way acquisition, access points and intersection improvements. Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection and preliminary concept plans provide for additional turn lanes to mitigate traffic and improve overall intersection operations. Both roads are County roads and ultimately fall under their jurisdiction Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat, comprehensive plan and Master Plan. Blocks and Lots Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 6 7 existing parcels (Lyngblomsten purchased 275 Ash Street). These parcels are individually owned by 4 different entities now owned by Lyngblomsten. Lyngblomsten currently has purchase agreements in place with all 4 owners. The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 6 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently demolished 49 Club. If the terms of purchase agreement for the 3 acre commercial parcel are not finalized between the private parties, the preliminary plat could be revised and the final plat presented with just the one 17 acre parcel that contains the senior living campus and restaurant. The 3 acre parcel would need to possibly preliminary plat and final plat at a future date. The revised March 11, 2019 May 11, 2020 preliminary plat is summarized below. Lot or Outlot Size Purpose Ownership Square Ft Acres Lots 1-20, Block 1 Typ. 4,161 sf 0.10 acres 20 cottage homes Lyngblomsten Lot 21, Block 1 194,214 sf 4.46 acres Common open space Lyngblomsten Lot 1, Block 2 181,122 sf 4.16 acres Senior living campus Lyngblomsten Lot 2, Block 2 53,044 sf 1.22 acres Future restaurant Lyngblomsten Lot 3, Block 2 30,800 sf 0.71 acres Future skilled care wing Lyngblomsten Outlot A 102,547 sf 2.35 acres Stormwater pond Lyngblomsten Outlot B 16,977 sf 0.39 acres Open space/lift Lyngblomsten 29 station Outlot C 93,809 sf 2.15 acres Future commercial Lyngblomsten TOTAL 915,795 sf 21.02 acres Lyngblomsten will be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of the majority of the development. The cottage home common area and senior living grounds will be professionally landscaped and maintained. Final Plat The final plat is being platted in the same lot, block and outlot configuration as the preliminary plat. Streets and Alleys CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) are A Minor Expander arterial roads. The development is served by an internal public road and 2 private roads. The streets and transportation plans are detailed previously in this report. As noted above, the 3 acre commercial site is under a separate purchase agreement with a different owner. If the purchase agreements are not executed at this time, the public road will temporarily terminate as a cul de sac near CR J (Ash Street) until future development of the properties. Lyngblomsten successfully acquired the 3 acre commercial parcels and 275 Ash Street. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 ft wide are provided on Lot 17 21, Block 1 and Lots 1-3, Block 2. Drainage and utility easements are provided over Outlot A and Outlot B. Outlot C shall also include the standard 10 ft easement. A separate public trail easement will be provided over the trail, private road and sidewalk in the cottage home neighborhood and over the trail along CR J (Ash Street). The trail along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) is located within the right-of-way. Powerline A three-phase overhead power line runs along the eastern boundary of the property line within the right-of-way. Another power line runs along the south boundary. Lyngblomsten is working with the electric company to discuss burying the power lines. Public Land Dedication The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Per the City’s Park, Greenway & Trail System Plan, a neighborhood park is not programmed for this area. Trail construction throughout the development and along Hodgson Road and CR J will be credited. The 30 clubhouse will not be credited since it is a private amenity serving mainly the facility’s residents. The clubhouse has been omitted. The City’s current Park Dedication fees are $3,000 $3,150 per residential unit and $2,400 $2,520 per acre for commercial/industrial development. The senior building is a mix of both independent living units (residential) and assisted-living and skilled care facility units (commercial). The cottage home and independent living units will be charged as residential units. The assisted-living units and skilled care facilities will be charged as commercial users. This practice is consistent with previous assisted-living facilities constructed in the City. The assisted-living units and skilled memory care facilities occupy approximately half of the 4.87 4.16 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 2) and will be charged at 2.44 2.08 acres. Fees are collected when land is final platted into lots and blocks. Future development of Outlot C (commercial pad) will be charged park dedication fees on an acreage basis at the time of final plat. Building Legal Description Total # Units or Acres Fee per Unit or Acre Total Cottage Homes Lots 1-20, Block 1 20 units $3,150 $63,000 Independent Living (IL)Lot 1, Block 2 96 units $3,150 $302,400 Assisted Living (AL) & Memory Care (MC)Lot 1, Block 2 2.08 acres $2,520 $5,242 Skilled Care (SC)Lot 3, Block 2 0.71 acres $2,520 $1,789 Restaurant Lot 2, Block 2 1.22 acres $2,520 $3,074 Commercial Outlot C Future acres $0 $0 Trail Credit (51,850) TOTAL $323,655 Comprehensive Plan Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the 20 acre site is located in Planning District 1. As discussed, a Master Plan was prepared for the mixed use area at CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) and approved by Council in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent the Master Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the Master Plan as detailed in this staff report and is therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is not warranted. The threshold computation of unattached units (20 cottage homes) and attached units (100 IL + 50 AL 96 IL +35 AL) is less than one. Wetlands A small 0.28 acre wetland exists in the northwest corner of the site. A wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental in June 2018. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on October 3, 2018. The wetland is not part of the Wetland Management Corridor and formal recorded conservation easement documents or declarations are not required. The 31 City will instead require a minimum 25 foot wide wetland buffer and signage via Council resolution. There are no wetland impacts. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review As discussed, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have spent several years working with the applicant on right-of-way needs and access points to the development. Adequate right-of-way is being dedicated along both CSAH 49 and CR J. Anoka County and Ramsey County are analyzing turn lane options along these corridors that are outside the scope of the Lyngblomsten project. During the PUD Concept Plan Review, the City of Shoreview commented the development should be served by City of Lino Lakes utilities. This has been accommodated. Shoreview also expressed traffic and access concerns along CR J and recommended a traffic study be required. A traffic study has since been completed and distributed to all agencies. The City also noted the need for trail connections along which has been addressed. Overall land uses are compatible. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the land use application on February 6, 2019. Overall, comments were positive. The Board recommended attention be given to the stormwater pond infiltration, wetland buffer signs, landscape buffers and screening. Public Safety Comments The Police Division reviewed the proposed development. With the proposed turn lanes on Hodgson Road and CR J into the site, there does not appear to be any public safety concerns at this time. Further analysis of additional turn lanes along CR J was encouraged and has been provided. The Fire Division reviewed the proposed development and had the following comments: 1. Add a hydrant to the east side of the of the driveway for the underground garage Hydrant has been added. 2. Add hydrant by club house and club house parking lot (one can serve both, possibly) Clubhouse has been omitted. 3. Hydrants in close proximity to all FDC’s (main building and club house). Hydrant has been added. 4. Elevators are large enough to accommodate stretchers and gurneys. Elevators are wide enough. 32 Findings of Fact The Findings of Fact for the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat are detailed in Resolution No. 20-94. RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat on August 12, 2020. The Board recommended approval of the development with a 6-0 vote. ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Civil Plan Set 3. Architectural Elevations 4. Resolution No. 20-94 5. Final Plat 6. Resolution No. 20-95 7. Development Agreement – To follow 6.8±LOUCKSW:\2018\18268\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\S18268-PREPLATPlotted: 08 /20 / 2020 8:28 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solelywith respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be usedon other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may bepermitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files forinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentionalrevisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additionsor deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify theConsultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.CADD QUALIFICATIONLYNGBLOMSTEN6075 HODGSON ROADLINO LAKES, MNLYNGBLOMSTEN1415 ALMOND AVEST. PAUL, MN 55108SURVEY LEGENDSPOT ELEVATIONGATE VALVESIGNLIGHT POLESANITARY MANHOLEPOWER POLEHYDRANTSTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINCONTOURCONCRETE CURBSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICBARBED WIRE FENCEWATERMAINCHAIN LINK FENCEUNDERGROUND ELECTRICCONCRETEA/C UNITTELEPHONE PEDESTALELECTRIC MANHOLETELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC METERGAS METERHAND HOLEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND GASGUY WIRECULVERTTRAFFIC SIGNALMAILBOXGUARD POSTOVERHEAD UTILITYWOOD FENCEWELLELEV @ THRESHOLDTHSDROOF DRAINRDNSCALE IN FEET050 10010/03/18 SURVEY ISSUED10/17/18 REVISED SURVEY10/19/18 REVISED PER COMMENTS01/09/19 ADDED ADJ. EASEMENT01/10/19 UPDATED SURVEY01/12/19 UPDATED SURVEY01/29/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS04/15/20 REVISED PER COMMENTS04/24/20 UPDATED SURVEY05/08/20 REVISED PER COMMENTS05/11/20 REVISED PER COMMENTSEDGE OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDSSPLIT RAIL FENCESAN CLEANOUTCOBUILDING COLUMNCOLPROPOSED AREASBlock 1Lot 1 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 12= 4,112 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 AcresLot 2 = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 13= 4,141 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 3 = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 14= 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 4 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 15= 4,307 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 5 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 16= 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 6 = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 17= 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 7 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 18 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 8 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 19 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 9 = 4,802 Sq. Ft. or 0.11 Acres Lot 20 = 4,234 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresLot 10= 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 21 = 194,214 Sq. Ft. or 4.46 AcresLot 11= 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 AcresBlock 2Lot 1= 181,122 Sq. Ft. or 4.16 AcresLot 2= 53,044 Sq. Ft. or 1.22 AcresLot 3= 30,800 Sq. Ft. or 0.71 AcresOutlot A102,547 Sq. Ft. or 2.35 AcresOutlot B16,977 Sq. Ft. or 0.39 AcresOutlot C93,809 Sq. Ft. or 2.15 AcresGross Plat Area= 915,795 Sq. Ft. or 21.02 AcresProposed ROW= 79,841 Sq. Ft. or 1.83 AcresWetland and Wetland Buffer= 22,750 Sq. Ft. or 0.52 AcresNet Plat Area= 813,204 Sq. Ft. or 18.67 AcresBUILDING SETBACK LINEAll that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southline of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with saidSouth line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawnparallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5.ANDAll that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginningat a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence Northat right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lyingNortherly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly lineof said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota.ANDThat part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on theSouth line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating.Excepting therefrom Parcel 21, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48.ANDAll that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southline of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line ofsaid Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating.Excepting therefrom Parcel 22, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48.ANDThat part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, saidAuditor's Subdivision No. 107.Excepting therefrom Parcel 20, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48.ANDLot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; andThat part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof andlying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No.107.ANDThat part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 described as follows:The South 237 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31 North, Range 22 West lyingWesterly of the St. Paul Waterworks right-of-way, excepting the West 696.33 feet.Anoka County, MinnesotaAbstract PropertyLEGAL DESCRIPTIONGENERAL NOTESSURVEYOR:Loucks7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55330763-424-55051. Prepared August 20, 2020.2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldworkis 6075 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN.3. The bearings for this survey are based on the Anoka County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1996 Adjust).4. Benchmark: MNDOT monument "0280G" located at the southeast quadrant of Sunset Avenue over 35W.Elevation = 929.28 (NGVD29)Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the southeast quadrant of Ash Street and Albans Street.Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29)5. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood InsuranceRate Map No. 27003C0344E, Community Panel No. 2700150344E effective date of December 16, 2015.6. The field work was completed on October 10 2019.7. Buildings on adjacent property are taken from aerial photographs and maps provided by others.Current Zoning: Zone (GB) General Business DistrictProposed Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit DevelopmentZONING INFORMATIONSITE DATAOWNER/DEVELOPER:Lyngblomsten1415 Almond Ave.St. Paul, MN 55108651-632-5387BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, ANDBEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYLINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS:(NOT TO SCALE)DENSITY(Acres)Gross Area 21.02Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.28Public Parks & Open Space 0.00Arterial ROW (CSAH) 1.83Other (Utility Transmission Easement)0.00Other (Wetland Buffer) 0.24Net Area 18.67# of Units 151Gross Density 7.18Net Density 8.09# of Units (Future) 223Gross Density (Future) 10.61Net Density (Future) 11.94BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, ANDBEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYLINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS:(NOT TO SCALE)PRELIMINARYPLAT1 OF 1LAST REVIEWED BY HENRY NELSON08/20/20 REVISED PER COMMENTSLicense No.Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and thatI am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State ofVICINITY MAPField CrewProject LeadDrawn ByChecked ByLoucks Project No.Minnesota.Steven F. Hough - PLS5485018268ASFHSFH/NJLSFHSFH,MJA10/03/18 Hodgson RoadAsh Street (County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)Hodgson RoadAsh Street (County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)GATEWAY DRIVEASH ST. ASH STREET HODGSON ROADHODGSON ROADGATEWAY DRIVEHodgson RoadAsh Street (County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)GATEWAY DRIVEASH ST. ASH STREET HODGSON ROADHODGSON ROADGATEWAY DRIVELOT 4 DRY BASIN 4P MATCH LINE WETLAND 1 NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGLOT 9 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 LOT 3 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33 PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 MAIN BUILDING EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 LOT 1LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 20 EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 LOT 13 LOT 2 LOT 15 LOT 17 LOT 12 LOT 10 LOT 16 LOT 14 LOT 7 POND 3P NORTH POND LOT 11 LOT 8 LOT 19 LOT 18 GENERATOR - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS. TRASH COMPACTOR - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN A1.000. DUMPSTERS - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN A1.000. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A1.000-A1.004 FOR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS REFER TO LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR JOINTING OF THIS AREA TRASNFORMER - REFER TO ELECTRICAL FOR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS. NORTHEAST PARKING MAIN PARKING BUILDING COLUMNS - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN R3.200 FOR ALL TOWNHOME LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS (TYP) NORTHWEST PARKING REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN R3.200 FOR ALL TOWNHOME LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS (TYP) HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT ACCESSIBLE SIGN (TYP) 4" PAINT STRIPE @ 3' O.C. WITH WORDS "NO PARKING" (TYP) 9'X20' STALLS (TYP) 9'X20' STALLS (TYP) 9'X20' STALLS (TYP) 9'X20' STALLS (TYP) RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND CONCRETE ENTRANCE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT CONCRETE ENTRANCE B618 B618 B618 B618 B618 B618 B618 B618 B612 B612 B612 B612 B612 "S" DESIGN "S" DESIGN "S" DESIGN "S" DESIGN VALLEY GUTTER CONCRETE PAVEMENT RETAINING WALL WITH 4' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE RETAINING WALL WITH 4' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE RETAINING WALL WITH 4' FENCE 25' WETLAND BUFFER 668 COUNTY ROAD J WEST SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 676 COUNTY ROAD J WEST SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 255 ASH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 241 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 233 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 231 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 229 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 223 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 221 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 215 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 211 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 4 6 6 4 12 27 26 517 26 20 MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL (TYP) RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND (TYP) RAISED MEDIAN / ISLAND (TYP) SOUTH DEVELOPMENT PARKING RETAINING WALL WITH 4' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURBEND TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB BEGIN TIP OUT CURB END TIP OUT CURB FAST FOOD BUILDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING RESTAURANT NOTES: 1.REFER TO SHEET C1.21, SITE PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES. 2.REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. NORTHEAST PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0 NORTHWEST PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0 MAIN PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 77 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 4 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 7 SOUTH DEVELOPMENT PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 153 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 6 SITE STATISTICS: 0 30 60 LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB PROPOSED BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENT PROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PROPOSED URBAN STREET PAVEMENT PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED DECORATIVE METAL FENCE PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN PROPOSED BOLLARD PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES) PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPERTY LINE 1 C2.11 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 DateRegistration Number Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109 C MN Revisions Description Date Num Scale: North Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAUL, MN 55108 LYNGBLOMSTEN MINNESOTA DAVID A. REY 40180 10/04/2019 196015 10/04/2019 BJD DAR 1"=60' SITE PLAN OVERALL C1.20 PUD Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Sheet rev 3-11-19 C1.20 PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/14/2019 1 PUD RESUBMITTAL 03/11/2019 2 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 3 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 07/13/2020 4 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 08/21/2020 5 Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)LOT 4 DRY BASIN 4P WETLAND 1 LOT 9 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 LOT 3 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33 PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 MAIN BUILDING EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 LOT 1LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 20 EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 LOT 13 LOT 2 LOT 15 LOT 17 LOT 12 LOT 10 LOT 16 LOT 14 LOT 7 POND 3P NORTH POND LOT 11 LOT 8 LOT 19 LOT 18 25' WETLAND BUFFER 255 ASH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 241 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 233 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 231 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 229 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 223 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 221 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 FAST FOOD BUILDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING RESTAURANT Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)8 8 6 887889895 06.5 98.5 98.5 895 89589510.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 896 896 896896 01.8 07.2 05.7 02.9 98.2897897 897 05.0 05.4 08.7 08.8 898 899899 89 9 05.7 98.5 98.2 900 900900 900 901 901901 901902902 902 902902902902 902 902 902902902 90 2903903903903 903 9039 0 3 903 903 903 90390 3 90 3 904904 904904 90490 4 904904904904 905 9059059059 0 5 905 905 905 9059059 0 5 905 06.3 06.7 EOF 05.2 05.4 05.0 06.0 EOF05.3 06.0 EOF 05.4 05.104.8 06.8 06.5 06.5 05.9 90506.2 EOF 07.2 06.0 07.5 90 6 906906 906906906 9 0 6 906906 9 0 6 90 6 90690 6 906 90690690690602.2 EOF 906906 906 90 6906 906906 906906906906 907 907 9079 0 7 907907 9 0 7 907907 907907 98.5 98.5 98.2 98.2 98.5 907907 907907 07.1 907907907907 907907907907 907 907907907 90 7 908908 908 90890890 8 908 908908908908 908 908908908 908 908908908909 909 909 909909909 909909909909909909910910910 910 910910910 910 910 01.9 EOF 05.1 910910 07.2 EOF 06.0 EOF 06.1 EOF 911 05.8 05.9 07.0 06.3 EOF 05.8 04.5 05.8 05.1 04.7 04.8 05.3 05.8 06.7 06.4 06.4 05.5 06.0 06.2 06.1 05.5 07.6 07.8 07.1 06.5 05.6 05.9 05.6 06.2 06.5 06.2 07.3 06.0 07.0 06.4 05.7 06.5 06 . 0 05.9 09.1 09.4 09.1 08.5 08.0 06.6 07.5 07.4 08.3 08.7 08.2 08.5 10.1 09.7 09.7 08.6 08.5 08.2 05.6 05.9 05.6 07.2 06.9 06.9 06.3 06.9 06.9 04.6 10.1 10.3 10.3 05.5 06.3 05.8 05.5 07.1 05.4 05.6 05.4 06.7 05.8 01.5 08.7 08.6 08.5 08.4 08.6 08.9 08.6 08.6 08.3 08.3 07.8 10.0 06.4 06.4 07.7 07.7 08.0 98.002.3 ME 03.1 03.2 02.9 02.9 02.2 07.5 07.3 ME 09.8 09.8 09.806.2 06.2 06.2 09.898.7 98.5 02.7 04.1 01.2 01.5 00.2 99.0 99.099.0 99.2 99.2 05.3 05.6 04.9 05.2 04.905.3 04.9 04.7 02.5 02.6 02.4 06.7 06.4 07.1 07.0 03.4 03.2 08.3 08.3 09.7 09.209.106.9 06.9 07.6 06.2 07.0 07.6 07.6 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.307.3 07.3 08.708.7 08.7 07.6 07.6 07.6 08.7 08.7 08.7 07.4 07.4 07.4 08.2 08.2 08.2 07.0 07.5 07.5 07.5 07.6 06.3 06.3 06.3 06.407.008.006.507.006.8 06.4 03.4 00.1 EOF 05.9 EOF 05.9 EOF 06.6 06.5 EOF 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 99.999.7 99.9 00.1 98.5 10.5 09.8 09.8 09.809.8 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 06.9 06.8 06.9 10.0 09.9 09.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.009.805.8 01.7 98.5 10.009.809.809.809.810.0 10.4 10.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 07.2 ME 07.4 ME 07.5 ME 07.6 ME 07.7 ME 07.8 ME 07.8 ME 07.1 ME 07.5 ME 06.9 ME 06.7 ME 05.8 05.9 ME 06.2 ME 06.1 06.2 06.3 06.5 10.0 10.0 09.8 10.0 09.8 09.8 01.6 01.5 01.2 00.9 00.9 01.5 01.6 02.102.8 02.7 02.1 02.7 02.8 06.0 05.1 05.0 10.5 09.9 12.0 11.1 09.0 08.9 09.8 09.9 09.4 10.109.8 10.0 09.9 10.0 09.2 05.2 02.502.2 02.2 02.1 01.5 01.2 01.5 01.2 02.9 02.1 01.5 02.2 02.2 01.9 01.9 01.4 01.5 01.9 02.1 01.8 01.7 02.0 02.3 02.0 02.3 05.3 05.6 05.6 05.9 06.3 06.4 ME 03.4 01.9 01.9 01.8 01.5 02.6 02.5 02.1 02.2 01.9 01.8 01.9 01.8 02.6 02.5 01.9 02.5 02.6 01.9 02.2 02.1 02.102.202.1 03.3 03.2 02.6 01.7 02.0 02.1 02.1 02.2 02.7 02.6 02.6 02.7 03.5 03.6 03.5 03.2 03.8 03.9 05.2 05.3 05.9 05.6 05.9 06.0 06.0 05.5 05.5 05.6 07.0 07.1 06.3 06.3 06.2 06.4 07.5 02.6 02.5 02.5 02.6 04.6 04.5 04.6 04.5 03.9 04.2 03.9 06.3 06.6 06.0 06.7 06.0 06.6 06.7 05.9 05.9 07.8 08.4 08.4 08.5 07.0 09.8 09.9 09.8 09.7 09.3 09.3 09.2 08.509.209.308.909.009.108.909.008.2 08.1 08.7 08.8 07.6 07.5 07.9 07.7 07.8 08.1 08.7 08.2 08.1 07.5 07.8 08.4 09.2 09.8 09.2 09.5 08.6 09.9 09.2 09.1 08.7 08.9 08.6 08.8 08.9 07.8 08.4 07.3 08.1 06.9 06.7 06.3 06.1 06.3 EOF 06.2 06.3 07.5 07.5 07.6 04.7 03.7 05.1 E O F 04.2 07.1 07.1 07.1 06.5 06.5 06.5 05.7 05.9 05.805.8 05.906.106.005.505.706.7 06.6 08.0 07.9 08.4 08.5 08.9 09.0 09.1 09.2 09.3 09.2 09.1 09.2 08.6 08.7 07.6 07.5 06.2 06.1 05.9 07.5 07.6 06.8 06.4 06.7 06.8 07.2 06.9 07.0 08.4 07.1 07.5 07.5 07.3 07.9 07.5 06.9 07.0 06.5 06.0 05.9 07.4 06.6 06.3 06.9 07.0 06.3 07.5 07.5 07.5 07.2 07.4 07.6 07.3 07.1 07.2 07.5 07.0 07.5 06.9 06.3 06.6 06.3 06.906.1 06.0 06.9 06.4 EOF05.506.006.106.1 06.0 05.9 05.6 05.9 05.6 06.0 06.2 04.9 06.2 06.3 06.4 0 05.9 06.3 04.7 06.2 06.3 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 02.9 01.8 ME 02.0 ME 02.4 ME 02.4 ME 02.7 ME 02.8 ME 02.5 ME 02.3 ME 02.7 ME 02.2 02.4 02.1 03.1 ME 02.2 02.5 ME 01.0 ME 03.4 ME 03.3 ME 04.0 ME 04.4 ME 03.5 ME 02.8 ME 02.2 ME 02.9 99.2 ME 00.5 ME 00.8 ME 01.7 ME 00.6 ME 00.2 ME 01.4 ME 02.3 ME 02.4 ME 02.5 ME 02.2 ME 01.8 ME 02.2 ME 02.1 ME 98.7 ME 00.7 ME 00.9 ME 99.0 ME 02.3 ME 02.9 ME 03.1 ME 03.3 ME 03.4 ME 99.2 ME 00.1 ME99.5 ME 00.4 ME 99.3 ME 99.6 ME 99.7 ME 99.8 ME 99.7 ME 99.8 ME 99.8 ME 99.8 ME 99.8 ME 00.5 ME 00.3 ME 06.8 ME 08.7 ME 10.1 ME 06.1 ME 06.2 ME 06.2 ME 06.8 ME 04.8 ME 06.8 ME 07.7 ME 07.0 06.1 06.0 ME 06.1 ME 05.7 ME 05.5 ME 05.2 ME 04.9 05.0 05.1 04.8 ME 04.8 ME 03.4 02.0 EOF 06.806.709.8 10.1 09.6 09.8 09.5 09.4 02.8 02.7 02.8 00.600.500.500.506.3 06.4 06.0 06.1 06.3 06.5 07.1 08.9 09.0 05.7 ME 06.1 ME 900.0 03.6 05.1 04.9 05.1 05.2 06.9 05.607.0 07.0 07.0 04.704.6 07.4 07.4 07.4 07.0 07.0 07.0 07.0 07.0 08.307.3 07.2 08.9 08.9 08.9 07.3 07.5 07.7 08.0 07.7 07.5 06.7 07.2 07.2 07.7 07.7 08.1 08.6 08.2 08.3 08.4 08.6 08.6 08.6 07.9 08.2 08.5 06.6 07.2 07.1 08.0 07.9 02.3 01.6 02.6 02.7 02.6 03.2 03.303.2 03.3 10.0 10.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.5 10.0 10:1 SAFETY BENCH 10' WIDE 8% MAX LONGITUDINAL SLOPE, 2% MAX CROSS SLOPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS BOTTOM = 886.00 HWL = 900.80 NWL = 896.00 EOF = 901.90 BOTTOM = SLOPED AT 1% HWL = 901.00 EOF = 902.00 EOF = 901.90 TOP OF WALL 909.1 BOTTOM OF WALL 900.5 TOP OF WALL 907.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 900.5 TOP OF WALL 907.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 902.8 11 C2.11 98.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 08.2 08.2 08.2 08.7 08.7 08.7 08.9 08.9 08.9 07.4 07.4 07.4 07.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.4 07.4 07.407.6 07.6 07.6 07.5 07.5 07.5 06.3 06.3 06.3 06.2 06.2 06.2 06.5 06.5 06.5 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.6 07.6 07.6 08.7 08.7 08.7 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 FFE = 906.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 906.2 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 906.5 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.1 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.1 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.6 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.7 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.9 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.7 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.2 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.4 = ARCH 100'-0"FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.4 = ARCH 100'-0"FFE = 907.6 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.5 = ARCH 100'-0" 0 30 60 1.REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. NOTES LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ME = MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATION PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES) PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) FLOW ARROW PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPERTY LINE 1 C2.11 955 954.6 BENCHMARK: MNDOT MONUMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF SUNSET AVENUE OVER 35W Elevation = 929.283 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF ASH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 906.81 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUANDRANT OF ASH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: THRESHOLD ELEVATION ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING LOCATED AT 6011 HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 905.36 (NGVD29) BENCHMARKS (FIELD VERIFY BEFORE USING) 1 C2.11 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 DateRegistration Number Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109 C MN Revisions Description Date Num Scale: North Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAUL, MN 55108 LYNGBLOMSTEN MINNESOTA DAVID A. REY 40180 10/04/2019 196015 10/04/2019 BJD DAR 1"=60' GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OVERALL C1.30 PUD Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Sheet rev 3-11-19 C1.30 PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/14/2019 1 PUD RESUBMITTAL 03/11/2019 2 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 3 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 07/13/2020 4 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 08/21/2020 5 Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)06.7 EOF 06.0 EOF06.0 EOF 06.2 EOF 02.2 EOF 01.9 EOF 07.2 EOF 06.0 EOF 06.1 EOF 06.3 EOF 00.1 EOF 05.9 EOF 05.9 EOF 06.5 EOF 06.3 EOF05.1 EOF 06.4 EOF 02.0 EOF LOT 4 DRY BASIN 4P WETLAND 1 LOT 9 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 LOT 3 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33 PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 MAIN BUILDING EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 LOT 1LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 20 EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 LOT 13 LOT 2 LOT 15 LOT 17 LOT 12 LOT 10 LOT 16 LOT 14 LOT 7 POND 3P NORTH POND LOT 11 LOT 8 LOT 19 LOT 18 25' WETLAND BUFFER 255 ASH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 241 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 233 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 231 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 229 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 223 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 221 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 FAST FOOD BUILDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING RESTAURANT Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)Hodgson RoadHodgson Road(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)10:1 SAFETY BENCH 10' WIDE 8% MAX LONGITUDINAL SLOPE, 2% MAX CROSS SLOPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS BOTTOM = 886.00 HWL = 900.80 NWL = 896.00 EOF = 901.90 BOTTOM = SLOPED AT 1% HWL = 901.00 EOF = 902.00 EOF = 901.90 TOP OF WALL 909.1 BOTTOM OF WALL 900.5 TOP OF WALL 907.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 900.5 TOP OF WALL 907.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 902.8 11 C2.11 98.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 08.2 08.2 08.2 08.7 08.7 08.7 08.9 08.9 08.9 07.4 07.4 07.4 07.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.4 07.4 07.407.6 07.6 07.6 07.5 07.5 07.5 06.3 06.3 06.3 06.2 06.2 06.2 06.5 06.5 06.5 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.6 07.6 07.6 08.7 08.7 08.7 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 98.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 98.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 08.2 08.2 08.2 08.7 08.7 08.7 08.9 08.9 08.9 07.4 07.4 07.4 07.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.0 07.0 07.007.4 07.4 07.407.6 07.6 07.6 07.5 07.5 07.5 06.3 06.3 06.3 06.2 06.2 06.2 06.5 06.5 06.5 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.1 07.1 07.1 07.3 07.3 07.3 07.6 07.6 07.6 08.7 08.7 08.7 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 FFE = 906.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 906.2 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 906.5 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.1 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.1 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.3 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.6 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.7 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.9 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.7 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 908.2 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.4 = ARCH 100'-0"FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.0 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.4 = ARCH 100'-0"FFE = 907.6 = ARCH 100'-0" FFE = 907.5 = ARCH 100'-0" LOT 1 INV. = 902.9 S = 28' W = 45' LOT 2 INV. = 902.7 S = 27' W = 38' LOT 3 INV. = 902.2 S = 27' W = 38' LOT 4 INV. = 901.4 S = 27' W = 38' LOT 5 INV. = 901.0 S = 27' W = 38 LOT 20 INV. = 902.7 S = 39' W = 30' LOT 19 INV. = 901.6 S = 38' W = 29' LOT 18 INV. = 901.3 S = 38' W = 29' LOT 17 INV. = 901.1 S = 52' W = 29' LOT 16 INV. = 901.3 S = 38' W = 29'LOT 15 INV. = 901.3 S = 36' W = 30' LOT 14 INV. = 901.1 S = 64' W = 56' LOT 13 INV. = 900.5 S = 73' W = 63' LOT 12 INV. = 900.2 S = 64' W = 44' LOT 11 INV. = 900.3 S = 81' W = 88' LOT 10 INV. = 901.5 S = 31' W = 43' LOT 9 INV. = 901.6 S = 31' W = 44' LOT 8 INV. = 901.4 S = 27' W = 38' LOT 7 INV. = 901.0 S = 27' W = 38' LOT 6 INV. = 901.0 S = 27' W = 38' DASHED LINEWORK SHOWS CITY LIFT STATION LAYOUT 1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, UTILITY PLAN NORTH WATERMAIN, FOR NOTES. 2.REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. NOTES 0 30 60 LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ME = MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN (FD) / DRAINTILE (DT) / PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN (PPD) PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES) PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) PROVIDE MINIMUM 24" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDE VERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH. CENTER ONE LENGTH WATERMAIN PIPE ON CROSSING. PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPERTY LINE 1 C2.11 955 54.6 1 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 DateRegistration Number Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109 C MN Revisions Description Date Num Scale: North Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAUL, MN 55108 LYNGBLOMSTEN MINNESOTA DAVID A. REY 40180 10/04/2019 196015 10/04/2019 BJD DAR 1"=60' UTILITY PLAN OVERALL C1.40 PUD Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Sheet rev 3-11-19 C1.40 PUD RESUBMITTAL 01/14/2019 1 PUD RESUBMITTAL 03/11/2019 2 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 3 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 07/13/2020 4 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 08/21/2020 5 NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING255 ASH STREETSAINT PAUL, MN 55126255 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014253 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014251 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014245 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014241 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014239 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014233 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014231 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014229 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014223 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014221 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55014MAIN BUILDING STORMWATERDRY BASINMONUMENT SIGNSEE ARCH.100' SIGHT TRIANGLE100' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLE30' SIGHT TRIANGLETOWN CENTERCOURTYARDSEE L1.4 + L2.3MAIN BUILDING SOUTHSEE L2.2WESTTOWNHOMESSEE L2.9EAST TOWNHOMES SEE L2.8NE GREENSPACESEE L2.6SW POND +GREENSPACESEE L2.76' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCESEE DETAIL6' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCESEE DETAILEXISTINGWETLANDSTORMWATERPOND - SEE CIVLMAIN BUILDING NORTHSEE L2.1BERM AND BUFFERPLANTINGS SEE L2.6NW GREENSPACESEE L2.663'-9"NO FENCE585' FENCE114' NO FENCE254' FENCEBEGINNING OF PRIVACY FENCEOPENING INPRIVACY FENCEFOR WETLANDMATCHLINEMATCHLINE270' FENCE @ 8' HT.8' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCESEE DETAILCOMMERCIALDEVELOPMENT2' MIN. DEPTH9" DIA. CONCRETEFOOTING TYP.2x4 NOM. CEDAR RAILTOP AND BOTTOM1x6 NOM. CEDARFLAT TOP PICKETSALTERNATING SIDESNO DOG EARSMIN. 8' 4x4 NOM.CEDAR POST6' TO 8' HEIGHT - SEE PLAN 3" MAX.8' O.C.GRADEVIEW OF SIDE FACINGNEW CONSTRUCTION.FINISHED FACE W/OPOSTS VISIBLE TO FACENORTH TOWARDEXISTING PROPERTIES.ALL CEDAR TO BE #2 OR BETTERWITH TIGHT KNOTS, NO HOLES,CHECKS, OR SPLITS. ALLFASTENERS TO BE HOT DIPPEDGALVANIZED OR STAINLESSRING SHANK NAILS OR SCREWS.FEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:LyngblomstenLyngblomstenSenior Communities1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN55108Hodgson Road,Lino Lakes, MN 5501408/19/2020186024RevisionsDescriptionDateNumCO L B E R G | T E W Slandscape architecture3101 East Franklin Avenue | Minneapolis MN 55406colbergtews.comPUD Submittal10/08/2018PUD Resubmittal01/14/2019PUD Resubmittal03/11/2019DD SET06/28/2019CD CHECK SET08/30/2019CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019LicenseNumber:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofDateMinnesota5/11/2020Garrett A. Tews48408LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCD SET10/04/2019PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by theConsultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant'sprofessional services for use solely with respect to this project.These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, foradditions to this project, or for completion of this project by otherswithout written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant'sapproval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADdrawing files for information and reference only. All intentional orunintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files,digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of thatparty making such revisions, additions or deletions and that partyshall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & allresponsibilities, claims, and liabilities.CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTEDDOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONSPUD DEV STAGE RESUB 08/21/2020Site LayoutPlanL1.01. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES.2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION.3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION.4. SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS.6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION.7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION.8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARYDIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THEINFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK.9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TOTHE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING.10.FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITECONDITIONS.11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.L1.0 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES1SITE PLAN1" = 50'1" = 50'0255010026' OR 8' CEDAR SCREEN FENCE DETAIL1/2" = 1'-0" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" 6 10'-11"11'-2"11'-2"12'-1"6.6 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" 5432 46'-6"50'-6"50'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" AB.2AA AC TOP OF WALL 146'-6"50'-6"47'-6 1/2"46'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" A1 A4A3A2 TOP OF WALL 146'-6"46'-6"50'-6"50'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" AB.2 AA.2ACAB TOP OF WALL 146'-6"26'-0 1/2"16'-0"50'-6"46'-6"47'-6 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" 10 7.6 7 66.6 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" 9.4 89 5 4 3 2 1 50'-6"46'-6"50'-6"46'-6"B4 A5.101 B4A5.101 F5A5.101 F1A5.101 D1 A5.101 F1A5.101 LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" AA.2 AA TOP OF WALL 146'-6"50'-6"CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONEREFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/6/2020 8:24:39 AMC:\Users\gbednar\Documents\186024 - City Review- Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base -2019_7-13-20_gregbednar.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\196015 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - City Review-Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base - 2019_7-13-20.rvtLyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus A5.101 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 BP Author 8/12/2020 - P+Z 196015 MINNESOTA 10/4/19 RICK J. MOORE 14836 ARCHITECT 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING WESTB4 6'12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING WESTB1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING NORTHF5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING NORTHF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING EASTD1 6' 12' A B C KEY PLAN D 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING NORTH BF8 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" HEFGG.1 G.9 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" E.3 G.3 50'-6"46'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" B3B4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" B2B3.6 SF8 SF8 46'-6"47'-6 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" BHBH.6BJ SF9 35'-10"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" G.1JG.9 E.3G.3 38'-2"35'-10"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" 14 11.21312 1111.614.1 38'-2"35'-10"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" G.1 JG.9E.3 G.3 10'-0"2'-8"35'-10"38'-2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" 16 1515.2 14.1 A5.504 D2 A5.504 D338'-2"35'-10"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" D.8B.2 C D A5.504 D2 A5.504 D335'-10"38'-2"C1 A5.102C4A5.102C7A5.102D1 A5.102 D5 A5.102 F1 A5.102F4 A5.102F6 A5.102 CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONEREFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/6/2020 8:24:55 AMC:\Users\gbednar\Documents\186024 - City Review- Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base -2019_7-13-20_gregbednar.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\196015 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - City Review-Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base - 2019_7-13-20.rvtLyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus A5.102 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 BP Author 8/12/2020 - P+Z 196015 MINNESOTA 10/4/19 RICK J. MOORE 14836 ARCHITECT 0 1/8" = 1'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING SOUTHC1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER SOUTHC4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING NORTHC7 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING NORTHD1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING EASTD5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING SOUTHF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING EASTF4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING SOUTHF6 6' 12' A B C KEY PLAN D Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 BASEMENT 88'-0" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" 141312 15.915 13.4 11.6 15.214.1 A5.504 D2 A5.504 D1 A5.504 D235'-10"38'-2"BASEMENT 88'-0" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" BGBF BH TOP OF WALL 146'-6"8'-6"22'-0" BJ 58'-8 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4"46'-8 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" BC BC.9BC.4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" BC.6 BD 47'-6 1/2"49'-7 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" B3 52'-2"B2 SF7 SF3 SF4 FR5 5" SF1B SF6SF6 50'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" B3 B5B4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" B6 B7B3.6 SF2 SF2 EX-W8WEX-W8S EX-W8S EQ EQ ACCENT WALL 18'-6"46'-8 1/2"47'-6 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" B1 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" B2 46'-8 1/2"F5A5.103F1 A5.103 B5 A5.103B1A5.103E6 A5.103D4A5.103F1A5.103F3A5.103F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/6/2020 8:25:32 AMC:\Users\gbednar\Documents\186024 - City Review- Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base -2019_7-13-20_gregbednar.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\196015 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - City Review-Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base - 2019_7-13-20.rvtLyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus A5.103 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 BP Author 8/12/2020 - P+Z 196015 MINNESOTA 10/4/19 RICK J. MOORE 14836 ARCHITECT 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING WESTB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" LOADING DOCK / GARAGEB1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ASSISTED LIVING LOUNGEB3 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING CONNECTION WALLE6 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING CONNECTION AT VERTICAL CIRCULATIOND4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER WESTF3 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER WEST-SOUTHF5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER WEST-NORTHF1 6' 12' A B C KEY PLAN D Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" BCBC.9 BC.4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" BBBC.6BD BA 52'-9"46'-8 1/2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" BC BC.9 BC.4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" BBBC.6BD 46'-8 1/2"15'-4"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" TOP OF WALL 146'-6"46'-6"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" BC BC.9BC.4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" SF4 SF3 BB BC.6BA SF6 52'-9"46'-8 1/2"C2A5.104F6A5.104F3 A5.103D5A5.104LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" ROOF 145'-3 1/2" B5B8 B4 TOP OF WALL 146'-6" CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONEREFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/6/2020 8:26:01 AMC:\Users\gbednar\Documents\186024 - City Review- Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base -2019_7-13-20_gregbednar.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\196015 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - City Review-Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base - 2019_7-13-20.rvtLyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus A5.104 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 BP Author 8/12/2020 - P+Z 196015 MINNESOTA 10/4/19 RICK J. MOORE 14836 ARCHITECT 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER CANOPY NORTHD5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER NORTHF6 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER NORTHF5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" TOWN CENTER CANOPY SOUTHC2 6' 12' A B C KEY PLAN D 0 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF DECK NORTH WEST ELEVATIONE2 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1"25'-2"23'-3"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1"23'-3"25'-2"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1"28'-2"23'-3"25'-3"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1"28'-2"23'-3"LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-1"28'-2"23'-3"CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONEREFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES D4 A13 F4 A13 B 1 A 1 3 D1 A13 B 5 A 1 3 F6 A13 F 1 A 1 3 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/6/2020 8:26:23 AMC:\Users\gbednar\Documents\186024 - City Review- Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base -2019_7-13-20_gregbednar.rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\196015 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - City Review-Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central_Stone Base - 2019_7-13-20.rvtLyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus A13 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 Checker Author 8/12/2020 - P+Z 196015 MINNESOTA 10/4/19 RICK J. MOORE 14836 ARCHITECT 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING WESTF4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING NORTHD4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING SOUTHB1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING WESTF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING SOUTHD1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING NORTHB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" SKILLED NURSING WESTF6 6' 12' A B C KEY PLAN D Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 20-94 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PUD FINAL PLAN/FINAL PLAT FOR LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat hereafter referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed Development based on the following plans and information: • Revised PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Submittal (78 plan sheets) prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers, Loucks and AJA, Inc. revision date August 21, 2020 • PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Submittal (134 plan sheets) prepared by Wold, Loucks and AJA, Inc. revision date August 21, 2020 • SWPPP prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates, Inc. dated October 4, 2019 • Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Development Access (CSAH 49 and CR J) Option 1E prepared by SEH dated August 20, 2020 • Revised Storm Water Management Report, prepared by Anderson-Johnson Associates dated July 13, 2020 • Design Guidelines prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers dated August 21, 2020 • Exterior Elevations prepared by Wold dated August 12, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City Council the approved the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat with Resolution No. 19-42 on April 8, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the Development on August 12, 2020; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development is not considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed below. 2. The City Attorney shall review the status of title/property ownership related to the final plat prior to release of mylars. 3. A Development Agreement has been drafted and shall be executed. 2 4. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat have been fulfilled or secured by the Development Agreement. 5. All fees, charges and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat have been paid in full. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall maintain a 25 ft wetland buffer as depicted on Sheet C0.00, Wetland Buffer Map. a. The wetland buffer and upland habitat will consist of vegetated land, consisting primarily of plant species native to this region, that is not cultivated, cropped, pastured, mowed, fertilized, used as a site for depositing snow removed from roads, driveways or parking lots, subject to the placement of mulch or yard waste, or otherwise disturbed, except for periodic cutting or burning that promotes the health of the wetland buffer or upland habitat, actions to address disease or invasive species, or other actions to maintain or improve wetland buffer or upland habitat quality, each as approved in writing by City staff. b. The wetland buffer shall be maintained in accordance with standard vegetation management practices. 2. The developer is responsible for the installation, establishment and future maintenance of all landscaping, vegetation, fences and signage consistent with the approved PUD Final Plan. 3. Future development of Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot C, Lyngblomsten shall be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board for recommendation to the Council. 4. Future development of Outlot C, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition shall require final plat and full site plan review. 5. Future development of Outlot C, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes shall be consistent with the 49/J Master Plan, Lyngblomsten Design Standards and city ordinances. 6. After site grading and street construction, City staff, developer and the property owners of 251 Woodridge Lane and 253 Woodridge Lane shall work together to determine the best location for a screening fence between their property and the public road. 7. A shared private road easement and maintenance agreement for the Cottage Homes and Private Commercial Road shall be recorded. a. The private roads and associated sidewalks shall be privately maintained. 8. A separate recordable Trail Easement and Exhibit shall be recorded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the Development subject to the following items being addressed prior to release of final plat mylars: 1. All comments from WSB City Engineer shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator shall be addressed. 3 3. A shared private road easement agreement for the Cottage Homes and Private Commercial Road shall be drafted for City review and approval. 4. A separate recordable Trail Easement and Exhibit shall be drafted for City review and approval. 5. A revised SEH Transportation Corridor Concept Plan with ¾ access at CR J and St. Alban Street and cost estimate breakdown shall be submitted and incorporated into the plans. 6. Sheets C1.20-C1.22, Site Plan and all other applicable sheets: a. Street names shall be shown (all private, public streets and County Roads). b. Label and hatch mark trails along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). 7. Sheet R3.200-R3.220, Residential (Cottage Homes): a. Air conditioning units shall be located in the rear yards. Please show location on plan sheet. 8. An up-to-date (within 3 months) title insurance commitment shall be submitted and reviewed by the City Attorney. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of September, 2020. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS LOUCKS City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, Steven F. Hough, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this Plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _______ day of _________________________, 20______. ______________________________________________ Steven F. Hough, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 54850 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________________, 20______, by Steven F. Hough, a Licensed Land Surveyor. _________________________________________________________________________ Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires January 31, 2025 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of _______________________, 20______, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota By _________________________________, Mayor By _________________________________, Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of _______________________, 20______. __________________________________________ Charles F. Gitzen, Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20______ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _______ day of _______________________, 20______. By __________________________________________By ________________________________________, Deputy Property Tax Administrator COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this _______ day of _______________________, 20______, at ____ o'clock ___.M. and was duly recorded as Document Number __________________________. By __________________________________________By ________________________________________, Deputy County Recorder/Registrar of Titles KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to wit: All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5. AND All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 21, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. AND All that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line of said Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 22, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. AND That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. Excepting therefrom Parcel 20, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 48. AND Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; and That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No.107. AND That part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 described as follows: The South 237 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31 North, Range 22 West lying Westerly of the St. Paul Waterworks right-of-way, excepting the West 696.33 feet. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way, and does also dedicate the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of _________________________, 20______. Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC SIGNED: ______________________________________________ By: ________________________________________, as ____________________________ STATE OF ______________________ COUNTY OF ____________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________________, 20______, by ___________________________________________, as ___________________________ of Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ___________________________________________________________________________ Notary Public, _________________________________Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires ____________________ SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS LOUCKS DENOTES INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON CITY PLANS. NOT FIELD VERIFIED. BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) DENOTES "PK NAIL" SET BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 HAVING A BEARING OF N89°44'38"W DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND, CAPPED "LS 12251", UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN DENOTES FOUND COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED "LS 54850" SCALE IN FEET 0 60N City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 SITE SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 20-95 RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council approved the PUD Development Agreement and Final Plat for Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition with Resolution No. 20-94 on September 14, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City’s subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement between Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC and the City of Lino Lakes for Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of September, 2020. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk WS – Item 3 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 3 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen Re: Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat Background At the Work Session, staff will present the September 14, 2020 Council staff report. The applicant, Tyme Properties, LLC, is creating a 1.43 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 7,800 sf commercial retail building. The name of the preliminary plat is Otter Crossing. Requested Council Direction None, discussion only. Attachments 1.September 14, 2020 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: September 14, 2020 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 20-98 Approving Preliminary Plat for Otter Crossing VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration of the preliminary plat for Otter Crossing. Complete Application Date: July 21, 2020 60-Day Review Deadline: September 19, 2020 120-Day Review Deadline: November 18, 2020 Environmental Board Meeting: July 29, 2020 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: August 12, 2020 City Council Work Session: September 8, 2020 City Council Meeting: September 14, 2020 BACKGROUND The applicant, Tyme Properties, LLC, is creating a 1.43 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 7,800 sf commercial retail building. The name of the preliminary plat is Otter Crossing. The Land Use Application is for the following: • Preliminary Plat o Lot 1 and Outlots A-F, Otter Crossing • Site Plan Review o Commercial retail building This staff report is based on the following information: • Narrative prepared by applicant dated July 17, 2020 • Civil and Architectural Plan Set prepared by Edward Farr Architects and Pioneer Engineering dated July 13, 2020 2 • Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020 • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated June 26, 2020 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated February 7, 2020 • Wetland Permit Application prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated July 13, 2020 ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions The 29 acre site is located in the northwest quadrant of Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street). The site is currently vacant commercial land that is being used for agricultural row crops. The soils range from lean clay to poorly graded sand clay. Hydrologic soil groups consist of a combination of B/D, B, C and B/D. Groundwater was encountered at 3 to 12.5 ft below ground surface. Topography is general flat. Wetlands exist on the site. Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned GB, General Business and allows for retail business as a permitted use. Current Zoning GB, General Business Current Land Use Vacant Commercial Future Land Use per CP Commercial Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R-BR Rural Business Reserve Agricultural Commercial South GB General Business Vacant Commercial Commercial East GB General Business Commercial Commercial West GB General Business Vacant Commercial Commercial Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code 3 The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development and zoning code requirements for GB, General Business as detailed below. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat contains Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A-F, Otter Crossing. The outlots are for future development and private road (Outlot D). Parcel Acres Purpose Lot 1, Block 1 1.4275 Retail building Outlot A 19.125 Future development & stormwater pond Outlot B 1.437 Future development Outlot C 2.2782 Future development Outlot D 0.6687 Private Road Outlot E 1.1566 Future development Outlot F 1.1946 Future development TOTAL 27.2876 Since there are no underlying preliminary plat and development plans for Outlots A, B, C, E and F, they shall be platted as one outlot until time of future development. The outlot will then be preliminary and final platted. This will be similar to the development of Main Street Shoppes to the east of Otter Lake Road. The preliminary plat shall show the delineated wetland and acreage. Streets and Alleys A private road from Otter Lake Road extends west across the north boundary of Lot 1, Block 1. The private road is proposed within Outlot D. Outlot D shall be incorporated into Outlot A and a private road easement agreement or Operating, Easements and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) recorded over it. This will avoid any issues with future ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the private road. The developer is proposing to record an OEM after ownership of the outlots is transferred; however, staff has concerns regarding future ownership of the outlot. No public street improvements are required except for a southbound right turn lane from Otter Lake Road onto CSAH 14 (Main Street). The private road is proposed at 28ft wide back to back. To be consistent with Main Street Shoppes, it shall be revised to 30ft. 4 An additional 60 ft of road right-of-way is being dedicated along Otter Lake Road except for a 35 ft wide strip that was acquired by the City in 2013 for the purpose of constructing Otter Lake Road. Similar to Main Street Shoppes, a Declaration of Access Control will be required. The Declaration shall state the private access road to the development will have full access to Otter Lake Road upon completion, but such full access must be reduced to right-in, right-out access upon further extension of the Otter Lake Road to the north. Staff notes the private road shall extend north to serve future development and eventually connect to the future full access at Otter Lake Road. The stormwater pond located at the west end of the private road would require the future road extension to impact a wider section of wetland. The developer may want to consider a redesign of the pond to allow for future private road extension with less wetland impacts. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided on Lot 1, Block 1 except for the west lot line. An easement shall be provided there. A drainage and utility easement is required over the private road and the stormwater pond facilities. Previously recorded highway easements and utility easements along CSAH 14 (Main Street) exist on site. Public Land Dedication The City will collect a cash fee of $3,603 minus trail construction credits in lieu of land dedication for commercial development for Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Crossing. A trail shall be constructed along the west side of Otter Lake Drive and construction costs credited to the developer. Otter Crossing 1.43 acres x $2,520 per acre = $3,603 Trail Construction Costs = TBD TOTAL = TBD Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The applicant is proposing to construct a 7,800 sf commercial retail building with 6 units on Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Crossing. The site plan indicates a drive-through service on the east side of the building which is allowed as an accessory use in the GB, General Business district. The site plan provides an area on the southwest and southeast corner of the building for accessory 5 outdoor dining or seating facility. This will require an Administrative Permit to be submitted by the future tenant. As discussed with the developer in previous meetings, staff is recommending the building be shifted towards CSAH 14 (Main Street) to mirror Main Street Shoppes. The intent is to create the private road as the “Main Street” to the development with commercial buildings and parking lots fronting the street. This will also be a similar to the commercial development on CSAH 14 (Main Street) as it extends into the City of Hugo. The developer’s reasons for locating the building on the north side are as follows: “The developer's reasoning for the building being located on the north side of the lot is multi- faceted. A building located on the south side of the lot as you are suggesting would mean the storefront entrances and the sidewalks would be on the north facing side of the building. The north facing side of the building does not receive direct sun. The lack of sun to help dry sidewalks after rains and aid in melting snow and ice buildup in the winter leads to increased maintenance costs, prolonged moisture resulting in building discoloration, and increased use of ice melt that deteriorates sidewalks and the building. There is also an increased risk of "slip and falls" for customers and businesses as a result of potential ice buildup. This increased risk leads to higher insurance costs and thus, higher operating costs for businesses and building owners. A north facing building does not benefit from increased natural solar gain through the storefront either. Again, that increases heating costs and operating costs in the winter months. Tyme Properties LLC manages other north facing buildings and has experienced these very issues and costs. One of the aforementioned buildings had to have the storefront and blockwork that supported it completely replaced far before its expected useful life due to salt and moisture deterioration that was mentioned earlier. Furthermore, a north facing building located on the southern portion of the lot would require tenant signage on the front and back of the building in order for customers to find our tenant's businesses. Visibility is a key component of a tenant's business being successful and plays a significant role in leasing space in a building. Tenants willing and able to pay new construction rents, (high rents), depend on visibility and need to face the busy roadways. Our submission promotes visibility, efficiency, and the optimal use of the site. We have already received feedback from one of our promising national anchor tenants that our site plan is "great" and they "love it." Our proposed site plan and building location is similar to the McDonald's site. It preserves intersection sight lines and visibility to the remaining outlots to the west. We have put a lot of thought and experience into our site plan and as far as we know, it fully complies with the city's requirements as submitted.” The Planning & Zoning Board discussed the idea of shifting the building south towards CSAH 14 (Main Street), but did not motion to revise the site plan. 6 A 5 ft wide concrete sidewalk is shown along the north lot line. A trail shall be constructed on the west side of Otter Lake Road with connection to the development and pedestrian crossing at the CSAH 14 intersection. Overall, the proposed commercial building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Lot Size and Setbacks The front lot line is along CSAH 14 (Main Street) because it is the public road right-of-way. The rear lot line is along the private road. GB Requirements Lot 1, Block 1 Otter Crossing Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 62,181 sf Min Lot Width 100 ft 240 ft Setbacks-Street Required Proposed Principal Building-CSAH 14 (arterial) 40 ft 110 ft Principal Building-Otter Lake Road (collector) 40 ft 45 ft Parking Lot 15 ft 15 and 20 ft Setbacks-Side Yard (west) Required Proposed Principal Building 10 ft 50 ft Accessory Building 10 ft NA Parking Lot/Driveway 10 ft 5ft1 Setbacks-Rear Yard (Private Road) Required Proposed Principal Building 30 ft 50 ft Accessory Building (trash enclosure) 5 ft 18 ft Parking Lot/Driveway 10 ft 15 ft 1This shall be revised to 10 feet. 7 Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials The retail building is single story with exterior materials consisting of brick, glass and EIFS. The color palette consists of earth tone dark gray, brown, light tan brick and light gray, medium gray, dark bronze and teal EIFS. Metal canopy and fabric awnings also accent the building. The ordinance allows for stucco or EIFS on no more than 30% of the primary front building elevation and no more than 60% of any side or rear building elevation. The primary front elevation has 14% EIFS and rear elevation has 47% EIFS and the sides have 26% and 19%. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. The building height is 23’ 8” which is less than that maximum 45 ft allowed. A trash enclosure is proposed on the north side of building. Construction details provided on Sheet A3 indicate light tan and brown utility brick over concrete block. The gate is painted metal deck swing gate that has 100% opacity. The enclosure is 7’ 6” in height. The trash enclosure meets performance standards. Per Sheet A3, the mechanical equipment is located on the rooftop and screened by parapets. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. Drive-through The east end cap suite is proposed to have a drive-through for a coffee shop or fast food restaurant. Drive-through service facilities are allowed accessory uses in the GB, General Business District. The drive-through meets the performance standards except for the following comments that shall be addressed: 1. Details of order board intercom shall be provided with the building permit. 2. Photometric plan shall include service lane lighting. 3. Additional 30 inch high coniferous landscape screening shall be provided along the Otter Lake Road right-of-way to screen the drive-through. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. Sheet Sl-1, Site Photometric Plan indicates light sources exceeding these limits and shall be revised. Light fixtures on the both the building and 28ft high poles are down lit and cutoff as required by city code. Architectural entry access lights are allowed on the front and side elevations. Off-Street Parking Requirements Sheet A1 indicates 6 potential tenant spaces (5 retail and 1 restaurant/drive-through). Per Section 1007.044(6), retail stores require 1 space per 200 sf of floor area and fast food requires 15 spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area. 8 This would require 26 retail parking stalls and 27 restaurant parking stalls for a total of 53 stalls required. The site plan provides 71 parking stalls so this requirement is met. It should be noted that any retail space proposed for any use other than retail (i.e. restaurant) shall meet the parking requirement ordinance. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020, the existing topography can be divided into 3 portions. The northern section of the property is generally flat agricultural land used for row crops. This area drains to the northeast to an existing wetland area which then flows to the north. The southern portion of the property is made up of primarily flat agricultural land that is used for row crops. This area drains to a large wetland toward the center which outlets at the southwest corner through a culvert under CSAH 14. The last portion of the property is a small portion on the east side of the property that drains to the existing storm sewer on Otter Lake Road. The glacial till soils consisted of lean clay, sandy lean clay, clayey sand, silty sand, and poorly graded sand with silt. Groundwater was encountered in six of the soil borings ranging from 3 to 9 feet below the surface. The parking lot for this commercial development will be collected in a storm sewer system which will connect to the proposed private road to the north. This storm sewer will be routed to the west where a basin with connected filtration cell will be constructed to abut the existing wetland. This basin will outlet to the existing Wetland A. This wetland will outlet through the culvert located at the southwest, which drains under CSAH 14. The pond is sized for Lot 1 and the private road and may be expanded to accommodate future development. The proposed stormwater management facility shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and RCWD to determine compliance for rate control, water quality and volume control. Public Utilities The new retail building will be municipally served by an 8” PVC sanitary sewer and an 8” DIP watermain located along the private road that extend from Otter Lake Road. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The Environmental Coordinator and Environment Board reviewed the tree preservation and landscaping requirements. The following comments are from the July 29, 2020 Environmental Board staff report. The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners’ reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. 9 A tree survey will not be required for this site, because there are no trees over 6 inch DBH to survey. Preservation and mitigation standards do not apply to this site. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. If the storm water pond area is going to be permanent, open space plantings will be required. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. This project calls for a 30 inch high planting screen. Continuous screen is not present on the north perimeter. Planning staff also notes the 30 inch screen is required to provide year round screening and therefore, should be coniferous shrubs. Buffer and screen standards have not been met. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Canopy coverage values are calculated per tree based on the anticipated size 15 years after planting, and the distance to hardscape edge from the planting location. Vehicular hardscape planned: 34,276 sq. ft Canopy cover requirement: 13,710 sq. ft Canopy cover provided: 8,675 sq. ft Canopy cover requirements have not been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs 10 For 320 linear feet of applicable foundation, 7 large trees and 20 large shrubs (or acceptable substitutes) are required for the north, east, and south building faces. The plans indicate: 3 medium trees 14 medium shrubs 25 small shrubs These substitutions are equivalent to: 1 large tree 17 large shrubs The foundation landscape requirements have not been met in terms of numbers or with respect to placement. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Area around the storm water pond from normal water level to high water level will be seeded with MnDOT 33-261, Stormwater South and West, which is a native mix of grasses, forbs, sedges, and rushes for stormwater pond edges. Above high water level in the storm water pond area calls for 35-621 Dry Prairie Southeast. The area north of Lot 1 will also have MnDot 35-621 to create a buffer strip for Wetland A near the impacted portion of the wetland. The remainder of the site will be seeded with MnDot 25-141 Mesic Roadside General or sodded. The Seeding Plan indicates this mix covering areas of the site that call for sod on the Landscape Plan. These two plan sheets should match. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan notes irrigation designed by others. An irrigation plan shall be submitted. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are not required for commercial developments. Signage A comprehensive sign plan for the entire building is required for multi-occupancy business buildings. The comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted with the sign permit application for all wall and monument signs. Preliminary review of the ground monument signs indicates they meet size and height requirements. The northeast sign does not meet the 30ft clear vision triangle and shall be relocated. 11 Ground signs are only allowed along public road frontage i.e. CSAH 14 (Main Street) and Otter Lake Road. The ground sign in the northwest corner of the site shall be omitted. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage in the GB, General Business District is 75%. The lot area of Lot 1 is 1.43 acres with 1.05 acres impervious which equals 75%. The proposed post- development impervious surface coverage is compliant. Traffic Study A formal traffic study is not required. The updated 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR analyzed traffic impacts for commercial development along this entire corridor. The proposed retail building is consistent with AUAR Land Use Scenarios #1 and #2 for commercial development. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Reliever and A Minor Collector roads, respectively, and have structural capacity to handle the commercial traffic. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identifies this site as commercial in the land use scenarios. The Otter Crossing project is consistent with commercial development. No further environmental assessment is required. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was completed by Midwest Natural Resources on September 4, 2019. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 9, 2019. Two wetlands were delineated. Wetland A is 2.59 acres and Wetland B is 1.19 acres. This project as proposed will involve impacts to Wetland A, which include 3,600 sq. ft. (0.0826 acre) of fill to allow for grading and construction of Street A, and 1,670 sq. ft. (0.0383 acre) of excavation that will allow for construction of an outlet pipe to discharge water from the storm water pond to the southwestern portion of Wetland A. There are no proposed impacts to Wetland B. Wetland mitigation being proposed for permanently impacting Wetland A will involve the purchase of 7,200 sq. ft. of Type 2, CORP‐approved wetland banking credits from wetland bank #1522 which is located within the same Major Watershed (Mississippi Metro – 20) and Bank Service Area (7) as the subject property. The wetlands are not within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) so a WMC wetland buffer is not required. A drainage & utility easement is being dedicated over the stormwater pond and a portion of the wetland. Additional easements will be dedicated in conjunction with future development of the outlots. 12 Shoreland District The development is not located in the Shoreland District. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement. The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. Final Plat and Development Agreement The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP’s such as curb, gutter, and stormwater pond. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The proposed retail building is consistent with commercial land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the commercial retail development. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Arterial Expander and A Minor Arterial Connector roads, respectively, and have structural capacity to handle the traffic volume of the commercial retail building. 13 Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan The new retail building will be municipally served by an 8” PVC sanitary sewer and an 8” DIP watermain located along the private road that extends from Otter Lake Road. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department provided comments on August 7, 2020 and noted that no additional right-of-way is required and that plantings and signage shall be outside of the right- of-way. Public Safety Comments Deputy Director L’Allier notes a hydrant shall be located closer to the Fire Department Connector (FDC) on the north side of the building near the transformer. The Police Division reviewed the plans and had no issues that needed to be addressed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their July 29, 2020 meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. Planning and Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on August 12, 2020. There were no public comments. The Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat with a 6-0 vote. Findings of Fact Council Resolution No. 20-98 details the preliminary plat findings of fact. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Otter Crossing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Color Rendering Exterior Elevations 3. Resolution No. 20-98 Otter Crossing July 22, 2020 Map P owered By DataLink 1 in = 400 ft ± DEVELOPER:TYME PROPERTIES LLC3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MNARCHITECT:EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS7710 GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVEEDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344PHONE: 952-943-9660CONTACT: DON ANDERSENCIVIL ENGINEER:PIONEER ENGINEERING2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120PHONE: 651-681-1914CONTACT: PAUL J. CHERNELANDSCAPING:PIONEER ENGINEERING2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120PHONE: 651-681-1914CONTACT: JENNIFER THOMPSONSHEET INDEXA0TITLE SHEETCIVILLANDSCAPE0.1COVER SHEET0.2LEGEND1.1EXISTING CONDITIONS2.1RESOURCE INVENTORY3.1PRELIMINARY PLAT3.2PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN3.3PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN4.1GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN4.2SEEDING PLAN5.1GRADING DETAILS6.1SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION7.1STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION7.2STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION8.1STREET CONSTRUCTION9.1WETLAND PLAN10.1CITY DETAILS10.2CITY DETAILS10.3CITY DETAILS10.4CITY DETAILSARCHITECTURALL1PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANA1ARCHITECTURAL SITE & SIGNAGE PLANA2FLOOR PLANA3ELEVATIONSSL-1SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLANSL-2SITE LIGHT FIXTURESSheet TitleProject NumberSheet NumberIssued ForDateProjectClientProject ManagerDateReg. No.I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Architectunder the laws of the State ofMinnesotaEdward A. Farr©COPYRIGHT 2020Location7/20/2020 7:33:54 AMA020.001TITLE SHEETDate16362DLAOtter CrossingMain Street & Otter LakeRoadLino Lakes, MNMain Street & Otter Lake RoadLino Lakes, MN Otter CrossingSITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020VICINITY MAPSOUTHWEST VIEWSOUTHEAST VIEWNORTHEAST VIEW LOCATION MAP 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-COVER 0.1 PRELIMINARY PLATRESOURCE INVENTORYEXISTING CONDITIONSLEGENDCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX0.10.21.12.13.1 OTTER CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLANS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COVER SHEET R GRADING, DRAINAGE AND4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN SANITARY SEWER &6.1 WETLAND PLAN9.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANL1. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 19OFOTTER CROSSING LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TYME PROPERTIES LLC 3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150 7-6-2020 PJC MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 4-15-2019 Benchmark Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 7-6-2020 Paul J. Cherne VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55110 GRADING DETAILS5.1 CITY DETAILS10.1-10.4 WATERMAIN CONSTURCTIONSTORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION7.1-7.2 STREET CONSTRUCTION8.1 SEEDING PLAN4.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN3.2 PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN3.3 c19OFLINO BLINO LAKES, MINNESOTATYME PROPERTIES LLC3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 1507-6-2020PJCMSNNameReg. No.DateRevisions1. 4-15-2019 BenchmarkDateDesignedDrawn2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.Mendota Heights, MN 551202422 Enterprise Drive(651) 681-1914Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS7-6-2020VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55110I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly Licensed Professional Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota42299Peter J. Hawkinson00-SURV- 118283 -BASE.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT3.1 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-SITE 3.2PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 19OFOTTER CROSSING LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TYME PROPERTIES LLC 3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150 7-6-2020 PJC MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 4-15-2019 Benchmark Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 7-6-2020 Paul J. Cherne VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55110 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-WETLAND 9.1WETLAND PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 19OFOTTER CROSSING LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TYME PROPERTIES LLC 3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150 7-6-2020 PJC MSN Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 4-15-2019 Benchmark Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 19860 7-6-2020 Paul J. Cherne VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55110 RETAIL CENTER7,800 sfOUTDOORSEATINGPARKING71 STALLSOTTER LAKE ROADMAIN STREET CR #14DRIVE-PASS LANETRASH40' BUILDING SETBACK15' PARKING SETBACK130'60'UTILITYROOMOUTDOORSEATINGPARKING CALCULATIONRETAIL 4,800 / 1 per 200 = 24FAST FOOD 1,000 (dining area - est.) / 15 per 1,000 = 151 per EMPLOYEE (est) = 6TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED = 45TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 71 DO NOT ENTER NO PARKINGTGAS METERSMENU BOARDGROUND SIGN S-1. 5' MIN. OFF P.L.DIRECTIONAL SIGNPREVIEW BOARDDIRECTIONAL SIGNAGEBY POSSIBLE DRIVE-THRUTENANTWAITSTALLWAITSTALLBIKE RACKVEHICLE STACKING120' - 0"1020LIGHT POLE2013GROUNDSIGN S-2.5' MIN. OFF P.L.GROUND SIGN S-35' MIN. OFF P.L.PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE15' PARKING SETBACK40' BUILDING SETBACKTENANT NAMETENANT NAMETENANT NAMETENANT NAMETENANT NAMETENANT NAMETENANT NAMEOTTER CROSSING11' - 8"8' - 8"1010122' - 0"LIGHT TAN FACEBRICK.INTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDMETAL SIGN BOX. DOUBLESIDED.BUILDING ADDRESS (TBD)DEVELOPMENTNAME DARK GRAY FACE BRICKSIGNAGE AREA200 sf MAXIMUM9' - 4"9' - 0"OTTERCROSSINGTENANT10101TENANTTENANTDEVELOPMENT NAME ANCHOR TENANTSIGNAGE.BUILDING ADDRESS (TBD)GRAY FACE BRICKINTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDSIGN BOX. DOUBLE SIDED.SIGN AREA 200 sf MAXIMUMBRICK or EIFS. SEEBUILDING ELEVATIONSINTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDTENANT SIGNAGE. 100 sf MAXIMUMELECTRICAL RACEWAY TOMATCH BUILDING FINISHSheet TitleProject NumberSheet NumberIssued ForDateProjectClientProject ManagerDateReg. No.I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Architectunder the laws of the State ofMinnesotaEdward A. Farr©COPYRIGHT 2020Location7/20/2020 7:35:51 AMA120.001ARCHITECTURAL SITEand SIGNAGE PLANDate16362DLAOtter CrossingMain Street & Otter LakeRoadLino Lakes, MNScale:1" = 20'-0"A11ARCHITECTURAL SITE and SIGNAGE PLANSITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/20200'10'20' 40'NScale:1/4" = 1'-0"A12GROUND SIGN S-1 (S-2 SIM.)Scale:1/4" = 1'-0"A13GROUND SIGN S-3Scale:1/4" = 1'-0"A14BUILDING TENANT SIGNAGE T/WALL123' -8"FLOOR 1100' -0"123456710' - 4"4' - 4"9' - 0"ACBDCDBEFCT/WALL122' -4"T/WALL121' -0"8A3T/WALL123' -8"FLOOR 1100' -0"1234567T/WALL121' -0"IJGMKLHJABCPIJIDDRIVE-UPWINDOWABC21' - 0"22' - 4"23' - 8"CBDFPAINTED 8" TUBEPOST. GATE HINGEPAINTED METAL DECKSWING GATE.100% OPACITYBRICK OVERCONCRETE BLOCK7' - 6"P2' - 6"MATERIALS LEGENDDARK GRAY UTILITY BRICKBROWN UTILITY BRICK LIGHT TAN UTILITY BRICK LIGHT GRAY EIFS MEDIUM GRAY EIFSDARK BRONZE EIFSTEAL EIFSWALL AREATOTAL AREABRICKGLASSEIFS HM DOORSSOUTHNORTHEASTWEST55%53%60%66%31%-14%15%14%47%26%19%-.05%--2,889 sf2,730 sf1,318 sf1,342 sf23' - 8"21' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 5"BAR JOISTDECK/INSULROOFTOPMECHANICALSheet TitleProject NumberSheet NumberIssued ForDateProjectClientProject ManagerDateReg. No.I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Architectunder the laws of the State ofMinnesotaEdward A. Farr©COPYRIGHT 2020Location7/20/2020 7:37:18 AMA320.001ELEVATIONSDate16362DLAOtter CrossingMain Street & Otter LakeRoadLino Lakes, MNScale:1/8" = 1'-0"A31ELEVATION SOUTHScale:1/8" = 1'-0"A33ELEVATION NORTHScale:1/8" = 1'-0"A34ELEVATION EASTScale:1/8" = 1'-0"A32ELEVATION WESTSITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020Scale:1/4" = 1'-0"A35TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONTScale:1/4" = 1'-0"A36TRASH ENCLOSURE BACKScale:1/4" = 1'-0"A37TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDEELEVATION NOTESA TENANT SIGNB ENTRY ACCESS LIGHTINGC DARK BRONZE METAL CANOPYD FABRIC AWNINGE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRYDOORF 1" LOW E CLEAR GLASS IN ANODIZEDALUMINUM THERMAL BREAK FRAMEG INSULATED HOLLOW METAL DOCK DOORS,PAINTEDH PRE-FINISHED METAL THRU-WALL SCUPPERAND DOWNSPOUTI 6" PROTECTIVE PIPE BOLLARD, PAINTJ WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTUREK FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONL FIRE DEPARTMENT ALARM / STROBEM GAS METER/SERVICE, PAINT TO MATCHADJACENT SPACEN NOTUSEDP PRE-FINISHED METAL COPINGScale:3/16" = 1'-0"A38ROOFTOP SCREENING 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 20-98 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OTTER CROSSING WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for preliminary plat for Otter Crossing hereafter referred to as “Development”; and WHEREAS, City staff completed a review of the Development based on the following: • Narrative prepared by applicant dated July 17, 2020 • Civil and Architectural Plan Set prepared by Edward Farr Architects and Pioneer Engineering dated July 13, 2020 • Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020 • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated June 26, 2020 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated February 7, 2020 • Wetland Permit Application prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated July 13, 2020; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on August 12, 2020 and the Board recommended approval of the Development with a 6-0 vote. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Per Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. 2 Otter Crossing is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Otter Crossing is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015. The cost of utility and private road extensions is being privately financed by the developer. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. 3 However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Otter Crossing meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). The I-35E Corridor AUAR analyzed traffic impacts for commercial development of this entire corridor. The proposed retail building is consistent with the AUAR Land Use Scenarios for commercial development. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Arterial Expander and A Minor Arterial Connector roads, respectively and have structural capacity to handle the traffic volume of the commercial retail building. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Otter Crossing will have an adequate water supply. An 8” DIP watermain along the private road extending from Otter Lake Road will serve the development. The City’s water system has capacity to accommodate the commercial development. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. 4 Otter Crossing will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015 and will be served by an 8” PVC sewer main along the private road extending from Otter Lake Road. The sanitary sewer system has capacity to accommodate the commercial development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby establishes that Otter Crossing is not a premature subdivision; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for Otter Crossing subject to the following conditions: 1. A private road easement and maintenance agreement or Operating, Easements, and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) shall be recorded for the private road. 2. A Declaration of Access Control for the intersection of the Otter Lake Road and the private road shall be recorded. 3. A comprehensive sign plan for the entire building shall be provided at the time of building permit. 4. Details of the drive-through order board intercom shall be provided with the building permit for that unit. 5. An Administrative Permit is required for any outdoor dining. 6. The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves that the following comments shall be addressed at the time of final plat submittal: 1. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated August 6, 2020 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 4, 2020 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department letter dated August 7, 2020 shall be addressed. 4. A hydrant shall be located closer to the Fire Department Connector (FDC) on the north side of the building near the transformer. 5. A draft private road easement and maintenance agreement or Operating, Easements, and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) shall be provided for City review and approval. 6. A draft Declaration of Access Control shall be provided for City review and approval. 7. All applicable plan sheets: a. A trail on the west side of Otter Lake Road and a pedestrian cross walk with signal improvements at the CSAH 14 and Otter Lake Road intersection shall be provided. Construction costs shall also be provided. 8. Sheet 1.1, Exiting Conditions: a. The acreage of the each wetland shall be included. 9. Sheet 3.1, Preliminary Plat: a. Outlots A thru D shall be one (1) outlot. b. Outlot D shall be incorporated into the outlot and a private road easement and maintenance agreement recorded over it. c. A drainage and utility easement shall be platted over the private road. d. The delineated wetland boundary and acreages shall be included. 5 e. The chart shall reflect data for the entire 29 acre parcel and include the wetland acreage. f. A standard drainage and utility easement is required along the west lot line of Lot 1. 10. Sheet 3.2 Preliminary Site Plan: a. This plan sheet shall be consistent with Sheet A1, Site Plan. Staff suggests creating only one (1) Site Plan Sheet with all pertinent information to avoid conflicting information and confusion. b. The parking lot setback along the west lot line shall be 10 feet. c. The drive-through lane at the south entrance shall be a minimum 12 feet wide. d. Actual building setback dimensions shall be shown on all four (4) sides. e. Locations of the two (2) ground signs shall be shown outside of the 30 ft vision triangle. f. The developer may want to consider a redesign of the stormwater pond to allow for future private road extension with less wetland impacts. 11. Sheet L.1, Landscape Plan: a. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 4, 2020 shall be addressed. b. Planning staff also notes the 30 inch screen around the parking lot and drive- through lane is required to provide year round screening and therefore, should be coniferous shrubs. c. The ground sign in the northwest corner of the site shall be removed. 12. Sheet A1, Architectural Site and Signage Plan: a. This plan sheet shall be consistent with 3.2 Preliminary Site Plan. Staff suggests creating only one (1) Site Plan Sheet with all pertinent information to avoid conflicting information and confusion. b. The northwest monument shall be omitted. c. The northeast monument shall be located outside the 30ft vision triangle. d. The parking calculation chart is incorrect and shall be revised. 13. Sheet SL-1,Site Photometric Plan: a. Light sources exceed 1.0 fc onto right-of-way and 0.4 fc onto adjacent property limits and shall be revised Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of September, 2020. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Julianne Bartell, City Clerk WS – Item 4 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 4 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer Re: Lois Lane Traffic Evaluation Background At the July 27, 2020 City Council meeting, residents from Lois Lane presented their concerns over speeding, vehicle noise, thru traffic and pedestrian safety within the neighborhood. They asked for the City Council’s help in addressing their concerns. The speed limit on Lois Lane is 30 mph. The City’s Public Safety Department (PD) has been on site monitoring the conditions and obtaining traffic data on Lois Lane between Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and Sherwood Lane. This work included: • Deploying the traffic data collector which identified 85% of motorists traveled at a speed just under 30 mph. It also included data showing the high speed near 70 mph. • The PD implemented directed patrol enforcement between the peak hours 1500- 1700. • The PD obtained speed data for garbage trucks identifying their travel to be at or below 30 mph. The City’s Traffic Safety Committee used input from the neighborhood and data collected to provide the following recommendations to mitigate concerns: • Neighborhood education via City mailing “20 is plenty” brochure. This has been completed. • Install a painted centerline skip stripe between Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and Sherwood Lane • Install 30 mph speed limit signs along the straight section of Lois Lane • Install four curve ahead warning signs with cautionary speed signs. Note these signs are not enforceable for speed, however failing to drive safely can be considered reckless driving or other. • Complete a post implementation evaluation: o Deploy the traffic data collector again to measure progress. o Consider temporary or permanent driver feedback sign if speed is determined to still be an issue. Funding would need to be identified. Attached is the proposed Lois Lane & 79th Street W Signing and Striping plan. The western curves will have a signed speed advisory of 25 mph, while the eastern set of consecutive curves will have a signed speed advisory of 15 mph. In August of 2020, staff requested quotes from contractors for the centerline striping. Staff also requested quotes for the sign materials, which would be installed by city staff. A summary of the costs are show below: Cost Centerline Striping $2,915.00 Sign Materials $372.58 Total $3,287.58 Requested Council Direction Per Council direction, staff would bring quotes to the September 14, 2020 City Council meeting for consideration. Attachments 1. Lois Lane & 79th Street W Signing and Striping Map 2. Quotes NOTTINGHAM LNMEADOWVIEW TRLCOUNTRY LNSHERWOOD LN 4TH AVEMARILYN DRN A N C Y D R LAKE DR (CSAH 23)MARILYN DRARLO LN SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF NO.DATE BY CHK REVISIONG:\Group Data\Municipal\Clients - Cities - Counties\Lino Lakes\Projects - Misc\Robinson Dr Crosswalk\Lois Lane Striping.dwg 8/11/2020 3:18:05 PMN AS SHOWN KJG DH DH LOIS LANE & 79TH STREET W SIGNING AND STRIPING CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 1 11515252530304" BROKEN LINE PAINT (YELLOW) PROPOSED SIGNS IN PLACE SIGNS LEGEND 1 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lois Lane And Robinson DrProject Name:Bid Number: Project Location:Lino Lakes, Anoka County, MN Bid Date:8/24/2020 Total PriceUnit PriceUnitItem DescriptionItem # Line #Estimated Quantity $1,440.00$20.0072.002582518 SFCrosswalk Multi-Comp $2,915.00$0.555,300.002582503 LF4" Broken Line Paint $4,355.00Total Bid Price: Notes: •All items tied unless other arrangements made. •Ability to complete pavement marking based on acceptable weather. •Please acknowledge low quotes within 10 days. •This quote shall become a prevailing part of our subcontract. •Sweeping, if needed, to be done by others. •No removal included without specific bid item. •Quote based on One mobilization. •Broken Line Price to Be Paid as Road Length Instead of Actual Length of Stripe ACCEPTED: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. Buyer: Signature: Date of Acceptance: CONFIRMED: Century Fence MN Authorized Signature: Estimator:Adam Jeske (612) 666-5595 ajeske@centuryfence.com Page 1 of 18/17/2020 11:48:52 AM WS – Item 5 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 5 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Diane Hankee, PE City Engineer Re: CR J (Ash Street) and CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) Trunk Utility Project Background The City Council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the CR J and CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) Trunk Utility Project on March 26, 2018. The purpose of the improvement is to provide sanitary sewer and water service to approximately 60 acres of property surrounding the CR J and CSAH 49 intersection and to strengthen the City’s water pressure in this area of the City. The sewer and water improvements are in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Utility Plans. The project includes a sanitary sewer lift station, forcemain, and re-routing the existing sewer flow of 12 Lino Lake’s properties that are currently serviced by Shoreview. The project also includes a trunk water loop along the east side of Hodgson from 6074 Hodgson Road north to Linda Lane. The water loop will eventually continue through the proposed Lyngblomsten site to Woodridge Lane and will provide improved water pressure in this area. The City purchased an easement from 255 Ash Street in 2019 to extend utilities to Woodridge Lane. The developer of the Lyngblomsten project purchased 275 Ash Street where the utilities will also extend through. WSB has completed the construction plans and specifications. As the Lyngblomsten project moves forward, staff will concurrently present the CR J and CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) Trunk Utility Project for bid. The total estimated construction cost including a 5% contingency is: DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED AMOUNT SCHEDULE A. - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $88,494.00 SCHEDULE B. - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $532,047.60 SCHEDULE C. - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS $287,647.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $908,189.10 Funding for the CR J and CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) Trunk Utility Project is through the Trunk Area and Unit fund. Requested Council Direction None at this time. Attachments 1. Project location map and plans RAMSEYCCSHOREVIEWCIRCLE PINESANOKASCALE IN FEET0 1000 2000 FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTUGTF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OF/OCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMCOMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMSCALE IN FEET0H:20 40 SCALE IN FEET0H:40 80 SCALE IN FEET0H:40 80 WS – Item 6 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 6 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen Re: 7831 Lake Drive-Variance for Roofing Materials Background The property owner of 7831 Lake Drive, Kathy Thayer, submitted a Land Use Application for a variance for roofing materials. She is requesting a metal roof with exposed fasteners be allowed. City ordinance allows for metal roofs with standing seam (i.e. hidden fasteners). In an effort to expedite the land use application process, staff would like to present the September 9, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board staff report to the Council tonight. The Council would then be asked to take action on September 14, 2020. If the variance is approved by the Council, it will allow the property owner the opportunity to install the roof sooner than waiting until October. Requested Council Direction None, discussion only. Attachments 1. September 9, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: September 9, 2020 REQUEST: 7831 Lake Drive Variance for Roofing Materials CASE NUMBER: VR2020-002 APPLICANT: Kathy Thayer 7831 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: August 10, 2020 60-Day Review Deadline: October 9, 2020 Environmental Board Meeting: NA Park Board Meeting: NA Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 9, 2020 Tentative City Council Work Session: September 8, 2020 Tentative City Council Meeting: September 14, 2020 BACKGROUND The property owner of 7831 Lake Drive, Kathy Thayer, submitted a Land Use Application for a variance for roofing materials. She is requesting a metal roof with exposed fasteners be allowed. City ordinance allows for metal roofs with standing seam (i.e. hidden fasteners). ANALYSIS In the summer of 2020, the property owner prepared to submit a building permit application to replace the roof on the house. The application included a Menards specification sheet detailing the roofing materials as Emerald Green Premium Pro-Rib Steel Panel with an exposed fastener panel system. City ordinance does allow for metal roofs; however, they must be standing seam (i.e. hidden fasteners). Per Section 1007.043(2)(a): 2 3. Single family dwellings shall have at least a four/twelve (4/12) roof pitch and shall be covered with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Per Section 1007.043(4)(i)4.g., this criteria applies to both single family dwellings and accessory buildings. g. Roof and exterior color and material compatible with home (except manufactured tool shed). The property owner ordered the materials before applying for the building permit. These are custom cut metal sheets and per the property owner, cannot be returned to the store or manufacturer. The total cost is approximately $2,000. The issue is the aesthetic value of the exposed fasteners. The intent of requiring standing seam metal roofs is so the fasteners (i.e. screws) are not visible. The property owner is also requesting the same roofing materials be allowed on the two (2) detached accessory structures (garages). Staff is asking for Planning & Zoning Board input on this request. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs 1. through 7. below. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The general purpose and intent of the General Provisions section of the Zoning Ordinance is to establish general development performance standards. These standards are intended and designed to assure compatibility of uses; to prevent urban blight, deterioration and decay; and to enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the community. The variance to allow a metal roof with exposed fasteners is not harmonious with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance regarding the enhancement of the general welfare of the community. 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided for Low Density Residential land use. The existing land use is single family residential with a single family dwelling unit and detached garage. 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic 3 considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner; however, there is no practical difficulty in complying with the required standing seam metal roof. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner was created by the owner purchasing a metal roof with exposed fasteners prior to obtaining a building permit. There are no unique circumstances to the property causing them to not be able to comply with the ordinance. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality which is a single family residential neighborhood with houses and garages. 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. The variance will not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and single family detached homes and garages are permitted and accessory uses. 7. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the variance to allow for a metal roof with exposed fasteners at 7831 Lake Drive. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. Property Owner Letter, Photos & Roofing Material Specifications 3. Metal Roof with Exposed Fasteners vs Metal Roof with Standing Seam (Hidden Fastener) 0 100 20050 Feet 78117811 78317831 78307830 78557855 78077807 78507850OAK LNOAK LN OAK CTOAK CTSite Location & Aerial Map7831 Lake Drive µ House Garage Garage CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) WS – Item 7 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 7 Date: September 8, 2020 To: C ity Council From: Julie Bartell, City Clerk Re: Election Judge Salary Background Every year the City administers at least one election and employs election judges to staff the seven election precincts. These judges also attend annual paid training sessions prior to their service. The City also administers absentee voting at City Hall prior to each election. With the increased popularity o f this voting method, it has become necessary to hire an election judge(s) to provide assistance to City staff. The current salary for the posi tion is $10.00/hour to serve as an E lection Judge and $11.00/hour to serve as a Head Election Judge. This salary level has been in place since 2015. Considerations for increasing the salary are: -Current rates are on the lower end of what other Anoka County cities are paying; -The Minnesota state minimum wage is $10.00/hour; -Election judge service is an important role and should be recognized with adequate salary; -Position can be difficult to fill in current pandemic situation; -Funding is available through Elections CARES Act grant for 2020 costs. Requested Council Direction Staff is recommending that the salary rate for election judges be increased to $12.00/hour for Election Judge and $14.00/hour for Head Election Judge. Attachments Additional background information on proposed increase. Current salary: -$10.00/hr for Election Judge position; -$11.00/hr for Head Election Judge position Considerations in increasing Election Judge salary: -Last increase was 2015; -The Minnesota state minimum wage is $10.00/hr; -For cities polled in Anoka County, the average rate of pay is $11.50/hr and $12.75/hr); some cities pay a higher wage to temporary pre-election workers (average $15/hr); -Important positions – recognize with adequate salary -Positions can be difficult to fill because of public contact element and current virus situation; Proposed Increase: Election Judge Position Increase from $10.00/hr to $12.00/hr (20% increase) Head Election Judge Position Increase from $11.00/hr to $14.00/hr* (27% increase) *AB pre-election workers would receive election judge salary of $12.00/hr Cost Consideration: Municipal (Odd Year) Election – General Only - $8,700 (average of 2017 & 2019) 23.5% increase = $2,045 (annually) County/State/National (Even Year) Election - Primary and General - Statewide or Presidential Election - $22,725 (average of 2016, 2018) 23.5% increase = $5,340 (annually) If approved, increased cost in 2020 should be covered by Elections CARES Act grant WS – Item 8 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 8 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues Re: Advisory Board Appointment Background Currently there is an open seat on the Park Board. An application for the Park Board came in from William Kusterman. Requested Council Direction 1. Appoint candidate to the remaining 3 year term on the Park Board through December 31, 2022. 2. Establish a date to interview applicant. WS – Item 9 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 9 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: YMCA Status Update Background In July of 2020, the Y notified the City that they would not be reopening the Lino Lakes facility pending further evaluation of the operation. As the City Council is aware, Lino Lakes provided considerable financial resources to make the YMCA a reality for our residents. The City provided land, infrastructure, and cash as part of the original agreement. The development agreement does include requirements for the YMCA to continue to operate a recreational facility. While the YMCA has indicated a need to diversify the programming at this location, the City Council has been clear that continued operation of the wellness center is our primary concern. A default, on the Y’s part, does provide the City with the right to reenter and take possession of the property. The YMCA is currently looking at both interim and long term solutions for continued operations. Currently, the Y is proposing to provide distance learning support to the community at large. Provided that the program does not preclude reopening wellness operations, staff is not opposed. The Y has kicked off their proposed “Reimagining” process. The first meeting of the steering committee was held on September 1. The process, facilitated by LSE Architects, will continue through the fall. Approximately four sessions with the steering committee and two community wide meetings are planned. The purpose is to identify services that would lead to a more sustainable business model consistent with the Y’s mission. During ongoing discussion, the City Council has expressed a need to evaluate options available to the City to ensure continued use of the facility as originally intended. Accordingly, staff is recommending retaining a qualified financial consultant to lead this assessment. The assessment could include multiple scenarios for evaluation. As a first step, staff would recommend sending out a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). Upon review of responses, the City could then select a preferred firm. As an unbudgeted item, funding would need to be allocated from City Council contingency. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting direction to proceed with a Request for Qualifications for the purpose of evaluating options related to the Y facility. Attachments None WS – Item 10 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 10 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator Re: North Metro Television CARES Act Funds Request Background The Council is being asked to consider a request from North Metro TV for reimbursement from Member City CARES Act Funds, for expenses incurred as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. North Metro TV has prepared a summary of costs incurred that meet the eligibility requirements for CARES Act Funds. Included are expenditures for PPE and disinfecting supplies, technology and equipment expenditures to accommodate Zoom meetings, payroll related expenses, and facility improvements (automatic plumbing fixtures and automatic). Treasury Guidance provides for transfers and payments to other units of government, businesses, non-profits, etc., provided that the transfer or payment qualifies as a necessary expenditure incurred due to the public health emergency and that it meets the eligibility requirements (necessary expenditures due to COVID-19, not accounted for in the most recently adopted budget, expenditures will be incurred during the covered period of March 1, to November 15, 2020). The total request for funds submitted to Member City’s is $63,103. The City of Lino Lakes’ share of this expense is $10,122. Requested Council Direction Consider support of request from North Metro TV for reimbursement from CARES Act Funds. Attachments NMTV COVID-19 Expense Summary WS – Item 11 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 11 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator Re: 2021 Budget Update Background Following the Wednesday, August 19th Special Budget Work Session staff prepared an update to the Gap Analysis highlighting a Gap to Maintain a Flat Tax Capacity Rate of $84,403. Modifications/amendments to the proposed budget to reduce the Gap to this level were as follows: CARES Act Eligible Items $140,806 Gator Tail Boat $39,000 Balance Air Handling Units $24,000 PT Recreation Coordinator/Summer Playground Program $59,147 Pavement Management (Fund at 7.5% Increase over 2020) $16,538 Temporary Suspension of Contribution to Park & Trail Fund $90,000 General Maintenance Worker/Uniform $78,585 Asphalt Saw (Minor Trail Repairs) $4,500 Police Division Personnel Request Modifications $198,347 PT Communications Coordinator $20,405 Uncommit $75,000 of General Fund Reserves, Transfer to Park & Trail Improvement Fund and Fund 2021 Park Budget Requests: Wenzel Farms Boardwalk Replacement $7,000 Engineering for Park & Trails Projects $5,000 Additional Trail Repairs/Replacement, Sunrise Park Rink Lights Replacement, Removal of Marshan Boardwalk $54,000 On Monday, August 31st, staff received updated Pay 2021 Taxable Market Value, Tax Capacity, Fiscal Disparities, and Tax Increment estimates from Anoka County. The updated information is favorable and provided an additional $644,270 of Net Tax Capacity Value or $146,905 at the Tax Capacity Rate of 39.870%. Furthermore, the increase has eliminated the Gap to Maintain a Flat Tax Capacity Rate and provides an additional $62,502 of funding. Staff is prepared to discuss the updated proposed budget with the City Council. Budget work sessions may be scheduled at the discretion of the Council to achieve the desired budget level for 2021. Council action is requested on the September 28th meeting in order to set the preliminary tax levy and to schedule a public hearing date in December on the budget and tax levy. The preliminary levy set at the September meeting may not be increased thereafter, but may be lowered before approving the final budget and levy in December. Attachments 2021 General Fund Gap Analysis 7/27/2020 8/19/2020 9/8/2020 Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed % 2020 2021 2021 2021 Change Change Tax Levies Operating Levy 8,368,756 9,907,192 9,101,827 9,169,865 801,109 9.57% Debt Levy 2,122,762 1,909,448 1,909,448 1,909,448 (213,314) -10.05% Total Tax Levy 10,491,518 11,816,640 11,011,275 11,079,313 587,795 5.60% Year-over-Year Change Levy $ 1,325,122 519,757 587,795 5.60% Drill-Down on Year-Over-Year Levy Changes 7/27/2020 8/19/2020 9/8/2020 Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed % 2020 2021 2021 2021 Change Change Revenues Property Taxes (Delinquent, Penalties/Interest) 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 - 0.00% Intergovt Revenue 616,459 631,569 631,569 631,569 15,110 2.45% Business Licenses/Permits 144,233 143,959 143,959 143,959 (274) -0.19% Non-Business Licenses/Permits 788,113 799,060 799,060 799,060 10,947 1.39% Charges for Services 27,538 31,183 31,183 31,183 3,645 13.24% Public Safety Service Charges 190,800 190,800 190,800 190,800 - 0.00% Municipal Fines 116,100 106,100 106,100 106,100 (10,000) -8.61% Miscellaneous 324,171 323,576 323,576 323,576 (595) -0.18% Trf from Closed Bond Fund 380,000 - - - (380,000) -100.00% Trf from CableTV/Communications Fund - 40,000 - - - *** Use of Reserves 200,000 - - - (200,000) -100.00% Total Revenues/Funding Sources 2,826,414 2,305,247 2,265,247 2,265,247 (561,167) -19.85% Expenditures Personal Services 7,605,738 8,126,189 7,741,585 7,741,585 135,847 1.79% Supplies 477,825 513,530 494,730 499,730 21,905 4.58% Other Services and Charnges 1,344,407 1,476,228 1,446,848 1,446,848 102,441 7.62% Contracted Services 722,084 821,636 748,636 767,636 45,552 6.31% Capital Outlay 42,117 205,706 10,700 28,200 (13,917) -33.04% Others 1,003,000 1,069,150 924,575 951,113 (51,887) -5.17% Total Expenditures 11,195,170 12,212,439 11,367,074 11,435,112 239,941 2.14% Debt Service Bonds 1,549,975 1,557,162 1,557,162 1,557,162 7,187 0.46% Certificates of Indebtedness 572,788 352,286 352,286 352,286 (220,502) -38.50% Total Debt Service 2,122,762 1,909,448 1,909,448 1,909,448 (213,314) -10.05% 1 Year-over-Year Change Levy $ 1,325,122 519,757 587,795 Total Levy Supported by Valuation Increase ($11,141,815) 503,392 503,392 650,297 Gap to Maintain Flat Tax Capacity Rate 821,730 16,365 (62,502) Tax Capacity Rate 39.870%43.352%39.941%39.613% GENERAL FUND FORECAST GAP ANALYSIS 2020-2021 WS – Item 12 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 12 Date: September 8, 2020 To: City Council From: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator Re: Temporary Wage Increase Background The Council is being asked to consider a fifteen percent wage increase for Accountant, Tracy Thoma until the Human Resources Manager position is filled. With the departure of Human Resources Manager, Karissa Bartholomew, Tracy will be performing many additional duties and responsibilities to fill the gap. Tracy’s additional duties will include assisting with open enrollment, benefits administration, recruitment, onboarding, compensation plan administration, unemployment, worker’s compensation, drug & alcohol testing, DOT driver’s license checks, and administrative tasks related to labor negotiations, CARES reporting, and FFCRA. The AFSCME labor agreement provides that employees who work at a higher classification shall receive a ten percent wage increase. Since Tracy will be taking on greater responsibilities, I believe a fifteen percent wage increase is appropriate. Tracy’s temporary hourly rate would be $41.26 starting Monday, September 14, 2020 and ending when the new Human Resources Manager assumes the position. Requested Council Direction If the Council is supportive of the temporary wage increase for Accountant, Tracy Thoma, staff will place this item on the September 14th City Council agenda for approval.