The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/08/2021 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, December 8, 2021 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. A C 11 1V11 A 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 10, 2021 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. MTO Properties-Thrivent Financial Final Plat and Site & Building Plan Review, Katie Larsen B. PUBLIC HEARING: Precision Tune Auto Care Conditional Use Permit, Jessica Eller C. Belland Farms Final Plat, Katie Larsen 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: oo Please address the meeting chair. oo State your name and address for the record. oo Please observe a 4-minute limit. oo The topic must relate to city business. oo Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. oo A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. oo The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. oo Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: oo The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. oo Staff will present their report on the proposal. oo Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. oo The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. oo After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. oo The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. oo The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE: November 10, 2021 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 8:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Tralle (Chair), Neil Evenson, Perry Laden, Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech, Jeff Reinert MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Root STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Janele Waterman, Jessica Eller I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on November 10, 2021. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I& � III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to approve the October 13, 2021 meeting minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 5 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. V. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:31 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:32 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. VI. ACTION ITEMS A. Take 5 Car Wash and Oil Change PUD Concept Plan Review Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 2 The applicant, Boing US HOLD CO, Inc., submitted a land use application for a PUD Concept Plan for a proposed car wash and separate oil change facility at 601 Apollo Drive. The 1.32 acre site is legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Lino Lakes Market Place 2nd Addition. Per the Market Place Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Design Guidelines Ordinance No. 03-05 and site plan, this lot is to be developed as a bank. Staff asked for input from the Planning and Zoning Board regarding whether or not the City should amend the Market Place PDO ordinance to change the site use from a bank to a car wash and oil change facility. Board Comments Mr. Laden said he is not opposed to the use. He stated the car wash, in particular, needs architectural improvements. He suggested the applicant implement a retro architectural design since McDonalds has a retro style building across the street. Mr. Laden commented, in order to change the use, the concept plan needs to meet or exceed the existing development standards for the site. Mr. Vojtech questioned if there is enough space on the site for the car wash and the oil change facility. He was concerned about ice buildup near Apollo Dr. as wet cars will be immediately exiting the car wash onto the road in the winter. He commented it appears 9 cars could fit in the car wash service lane, but if the facility is busy, the remaining cars will be backed up onto the road near the Apollo Dr. and Lake Dr. intersection and he said this could be a safety issue. Mr. Vojtech stated he supports the idea of the car wash, but wondered if there is enough space on the site. Mr. Reinert liked the concept plan. He hoped the concept plan would be developed in Lino Lakes, but at a different location as a different use was envisioned for this site. He also expressed concern with ice build-up on the road near Apollo Dr. Chair Tralle stated, although the use of the site has been reserved for a bank, the land has remained vacant for 21 years. He said the Board has an opportunity to allow a car wash and oil change facility to come to town and make use of the empty lot. He said there is a need for a car wash and oil change facility in Lino Lakes and residents should not have to drive to nearby cities to receive such services. He commented Lino Lakes does not need another bank in town. Chair Tralle recommended the site be used for something other than a bank if the proposed concept plan does not proceed to City Council. Mr. Wipperfurth agreed. He commented since a bank currently owns the lot and they do not have plans to build on the site, it is not likely another bank would construct there either. He said the car wash and oil change concept is a good idea. Jerod Hanaman, 4290 Creekside Way, Minnetrista, MN 55331, with Driven Brands, said Take 5 is a competitor of Valvoline. He shared the car wash concept is relatively DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 3 new, but they have begun constructing the facilities nationwide. He stated this site was specifically targeted because they thought there was a need for a car wash and oil change facility on this side of town. He said the architecture and site plan can be adjusted according to what the City would like to see. Mr. Hanaman shared his objective of the meeting is to know whether or not the proposed concept plan at this specific site will be considered by the Board. He commented Driven Brands is working with a franchisee who has a license for the oil change facility and they are trying to incorporate both concepts, however, the car wash is required in order for the project to move forward. Mr. Wipperfurth asked if it is typical to have the cars drive in the long driveway to access the vacuum bays or would it be constructed to allow cars to drive immediately into the vacuum bay area. Mr. Hanaman said the long driveway on the plan is simply demonstrating they would be compliant with stacking requirements for pay stations. He stated they typically want the exit to go into the vacuum bay area rather than onto the road. Mr. Vojtech asked if this will be a self -vacuum facility and an express car wash. Mr. Hanaman said yes. He stated there will be two employees for the car wash who will assist with memberships or maintenance and there will be a few employees on site for the oil change facility. Mr. Evenson asked what the hours of operation are. Mr. Hanaman explained general operating hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. on weekdays and on Sundays the facilities will close around 5 p.m. or 6 p.m. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend changing the use of the site from a bank to a car wash and/or oil change facility. Motion was supported by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 3 — 2. Chair Tralle abstained. VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Zoning Ordinance Update — Zoning Districts & Performance Standards, Kevin Shay, Landform Mr. Kevin Shay, Landform, presented the staff report. He requested feedback from the Planning and Zoning Board regarding driveway width, impervious surface area, brewpub locations, garage area, side yard setbacks, and porch depth. Driveway Width Resident Comments DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 4 Mike Settimi, 1393 Hunters Ridge, said he has been trying to get approval from the City for a 30 ft. driveway for over a year. He stated he has a lot of visitors and his three daughters moved back home. He commented since on street parking is limited due to the arrival of winter, having a wider driveway would allow him to be able to park more vehicles in the driveway. He shared he is also intending to buy a boat and store it in the third stall which will limit parking capacity as well. He explained his request for a 30 ft. wide driveway it not unprecedented in the City as he found over 80 driveways in the City with three stall garages and parallel driveway widths. He said there are approximately 8 houses within his neighborhood with driveways 30 ft. or greater in width. Moreover, he commented most of the new construction homes in Lino Lakes will have three stall garages and he said a 30 ft. wide driveway would match the width of the garage thereby eliminating the current 45 degree angle in front of the third stall. Mr. Settimi stated from 1998 to 2003, the City allowed 36 ft. wide driveways. He questioned why 36 ft. is no longer allowed. He commented the City's Environmental Coordinator came to his home and said widening the driveway will not be an issue since the nearby boulevard tree will not need to be removed. He said, since the driveway would be widened towards the mailbox on street parking would not be impacted. Chair Tralle stated Mr. Settimi came to the Planning and Zoning Board previously for his driveway variance and it was denied. He asked Mr. Settimi if he met with City Council regarding his variance. Mr. Settimi said he did not meet with City Council. Chair Tralle asked why he did not continue onto City Council with his variance request. Mr. Settimi said he spoke to each individual board member. Each of the City Council members, except Michael Ruhland, came to his home and they told Mr. Settimi his driveway variance request was simple compared to other requests the City receives. Chair Tralle informed Mr. Settimi he needs to proceed with this variance request and address City Council. Mayor Rafferty, 1573 Merganser Ct, addressed the Board. He questioned how the City determined the 26 ft. driveway width limit. He surmised the decision was made based on one 16 ft. garage door plus an 8 ft. garage door with one foot in between. He encouraged the Board to consider the possibility of one 16 ft. garage door plus an 8 ft. garage door with 4 ft. in between which would amount to 28 ft. in width and allow the driveway to continue straight down from the third stall. He stated the discussion is important since the zoning ordinance is currently being reviewed. Board Comments Mr. Evenson said a 26 ft. wide driveway is adequate. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 5 Mr. Reinert agreed. Mr. Wipperfurth shared his driveway is 26 ft. wide with a 45 degree angle in front of the third stall near the street. He stated he would prefer the driveway continue straight down from the third stall. He surmised residents with large lot widths may be frustrated to know they can only have a driveway 26 ft. in width. He said residents with narrow lots, who desire a wide driveway, run into the issue of the driveway infringing on the front yard space. He commented he likes the idea of increasing the driveway width to 28 ft. Mr. Vojtech said although his driveway is 20 ft. wide, there is dead grass on either side of the driveway due to parking. He stated he would be in favor of increasing the driveway width. Mr. Laden commented what occurs at your garage has very little to do with what occurs at the street. He continued, the spacing between garage doors and the size of the garage doors should not dictate driveway width. He encourage the Board to enforce whatever width is decided upon. He explained most of the variances the Board has addressed were the result of the homeowner's mistake in not understanding how wide the driveway can be. He said the minimum lot width is 80 ft. and if 30 ft. of the width is driveway, 50 ft. remains for green space which is adequate. He recommended increasing driveway width to 28 ft. or 30 ft. except on lots smaller than 80 ft. wide. Chair Tralle agreed with Mr. Laden's recommendation to increase the driveway width to 28 ft. or 30 ft. He understood Mr. Settimi's frustration with needing more parking space since his children have moved back home. He commented, although Mr. Settimi could rent a garage for his boat, it does not fully address his parking issue. Mr. Grochala noted in a parking lot, three adjoining stalls equals 27 ft. in width. He stated one concern with widening the driveway is as the width is increased a third isle is created and if cars are parked in that third stall visibility is limited for pedestrians on the street. He said the City recognizes the 36 ft. driveway width, approved several years ago, was not appropriate. He explained the decision was partially driven by the increased size of garages. Another concern the City has with increasing driveway width is the City owns 12 ft. of right -of way for utility purposes and this would be infringed upon. He said the City spends approximately $3,000 on replacing driveway aprons when streets are reconstructed and residents bare that tax. He concurred with Mr. Laden's comment that whatever width is decided upon needs to be enforced. He stated no matter what width is chosen, there will always be someone who does not think the driveway width is large enough. He recommended the Board determine width based on what would accommodate vehicles going into and coming out of driveways. He said City Council will make the final decision regarding width, but they will look to the Planning and Zoning Board for recommendation. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 6 Mr. Reinert agreed with Mr. Grochala's sentiments about ensuring the driveway width maximum is consistently enforced. Mr. Wipperfurth made a MOTION to recommend changing the driveway width maximum from 26 ft. to 28 ft. Motion was supported by Mr. Vojtech. Motion carried 3 — 2. Chair Tralle abstained. Impervious Surface Area Board Comments Mr. Reinert reiterated staff is recommending increasing impervious surface area to 65% across all residential districts. He tried to recall what the Board decided at last month's meeting concerning impervious surface area. Chair Tralle reviewed the November 1 Oth meeting minutes and reminded the Board recommendation was made to increase impervious surface to 65% for lots less than three-quarters of an acre and 50% for lots three-quarters of an acre or more. Mr. Grochala explained staff s concern with that recommendation is how should City staff address individuals who are at .74 of an acre who want the remaining one tenth impervious surface they are permitted. He said 65% impervious surface area was previously allowed for single family until it was adjusted in 2011 during the comp plan update. He stated City staff would like to simplify the matter and allow 65% impervious surface area for all residential districts. Mr. Shay reminded the Board there is a stormwater limitation of 10,000 sq. ft. for impervious surface which will restrict lots irrespective of the Board's recommendation to allow 65% for lots less than three-quarters of an acre and 50% for lots three-quarters of an acre or more. Mr. Laden asked how large would your lot need to be in order to reach the 10,000 sq. ft. limitation. Mr. Wipperfurth said you would reach the 10,000 sq. ft. limit if your lot was .35 acres. Mr. Grochala stated if a resident reached their 10,000 sq. ft. impervious surface limit, they would need to submit a stormwater management plan. The Board decided to increase impervious surface area to 65% across all residential districts with the understanding Shoreland District impervious surface regulations would still apply to those property within the shoreland district. Brewpub Locations DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 7 Board Comments Chair Tralle relayed Mr. Root's recommendation onto the Board. Mr. Root recommended adding definitions for businesses that produce other alcoholic beverages including distillery, cidery, winery, meadery, and sake brewery. Chair Tralle agreed with Mr. Root's recommendation. Mr. Wipperfurth asked staff what is the downside to allowing brewer taprooms in more districts. Mr. Grochala explained, according to state law, brewer taprooms are an accessory use to a brewery. Therefore, by allowing brewer taprooms, breweries would also be permitted in any district. He said breweries are typically industrial uses and they are not appropriate in a commercial area. Mr. Wipperfurth clarified Big Wood Brewery in downtown White Bear Lake would not be allowed in Lino Lakes unless it was located in a light industrial area. Mr. Shay explained, for example, since Surly does all of their bottling in house, they would need to be located in an industrial area. However, a brewpub like Granite City would not need to be located in an industrial area because their bottling is a small portion of their business and it is only available at their brewpub. Mr. Grochala said if the Board wanted to allow breweries by conditional use permit in a commercial district or in the general business district, you would likely establish a limitation for companies not producing more than a specified number of bottles. Mr. Shay clarified the limitation would be established based on state statute. Mr. Reinert asked if a small brewer can be located in a general business district and sell up to a specific quantity in retail. Mr. Shay said yes. Chair Tralle stated there is no reason a brewpub or a taproom should not be allowed in Lino Lakes. Mr. Reinert agreed. He appreciated Mr. Root's suggestion to address various alcoholic beverages other than beer. He commented since they are increasing in popularity, we should adjust our zoning ordinance to address them and encourage such businesses to come to Lino Lakes. Chair Tralle recommended City staff return with a recommendation on how to address breweries, distilleries, etc. at next month's meeting. Mr. Reinert concurred. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 8 Mr. Laden agreed with Chair Tralle's instruction that staff to look into other production beverages besides beer. He stated since a taproom, by definition, could be an industrial bottling/brewing company with a tasting room, he did not think it would be appropriate to allow such business in a commercial zone. He said brewpubs should be allowed anywhere bars are allowed. Mr. Shay clarified brewpubs are allowed in the same areas bars are, but brewer taprooms are not. Mr. Vojtech asked since breweries and brewpubs can serve food, can they also serve a variety of beer, liquor, and alcohol. Mr. Shay said liquor is limited. Garage Area Board Comments Chair Tralle asked Mr. Shay if he has ever been told by a resident that their garage is too large. Mr. Shay said no. Vz Chair Tralle asked Mr. Shay if he has heard residents say their garages should be larger. Mr. Shay said yes. He reminded the Board they are specifically addressing garage area minimums, but he noted residents will always have the option to enlarge their garages. Mr. Reinert stated he would like to increase the garage area minimum to 22 ft. by 22 ft. Chair Tralle concurred. Discussion ensued between City staff and the Board regarding whether square footage should be measured from the exterior, midpoint, or interior of the wall. Chair Tralle liked the idea of measuring from the interior of the wall because it is clear how much useable space an individual has. Mr. Laden explained the problem with measuring from the interior of the wall is the dimensions are never on the plan and it requires the building inspector to scale up a drawing. He recommended measuring from the exterior of the wall and if it is a party wall, measuring from the midpoint. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 9 Mr. Reinert suggested the Board choose garage dimensions that accommodate measuring from the outside. He recommended garage dimensions of 23 ft. by 23 ft. or 22 ft. by 24 ft. as measured by the exterior of the wall for townhomes and single family homes. The interior square footage would be either 529 sq. ft. or 528 sq. ft. Mr. Laden gave the Board a handout with two garages depicted, one garage 20 ft. by 22 ft. and another garage 22 ft. by 24 ft. He explained both garages have the ability to store vehicles of various sizes and have extra space on the sides for storage. He said, as a minimum standard, we do not need to require residents to be able to accommodate suburbans, pickup trucks, and box vans, etc. Mr. Wipperfurth agreed. He stated, if we increase the minimum garage area, we are requiring residents to build a garage that could be larger than half of their house footprint. He continued, this could create another issue as the garage would take up a larger portion of facade. He recommended retaining the 440 sq. ft. minimum garage area or reducing it. Mr. Laden asked if the discussion concerning minimum garage area included townhomes and duplexes. Mr. Shay said townhomes, duplexes, and single family homes are a part of the conversation. k Mr. Laden commented single family homes should not need to have a minimum square footage greater than 440 sq. ft. because they have basements and are allowed to have accessory buildings for storage. He stated an argument could be made for increasing the minimum garage area for townhomes and duplexes since most are slab on grade and accessory buildings are not allowed. He recommended implementing a minimum garage area measuring from the exterior wall without specifying dimensions. Mr. Evenson stated at a minimum, the garage should be able to store two vehicles. He asked if 440 sq. ft. would be able to accommodate two vehicles. Mr. Laden said with 440 sq. ft. could accommodate two vehicles and more. He clarified, the current ordinance for single family homes states a two car garage is required, but dimensions and square footage is not specified. He recalled the R-2 district did not specify dimensions or square footage either. Ms. Larsen said the 20 ft. minimum requirement for the R-2 district is listed in the performance standards section of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to recommend a garage area minimum of 529 sq. ft. as measured by the outside wall. Motion was supported by Mr. Vojtech. Chair Tralle recommended amending the motion to include a garage area minimum of 530 sq. ft. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 10 as measured by the outside wall with a minimum width of 20 ft. Mr. Reinert and Mr. Vojtech accepted the amendment. Motion carried 3 — 2. Chair Tralle abstained. Side Yard Setbacks Board Comments Mr. Reinert recommended a 10 ft. side yard setback which would provide 20 ft. between each home. He also supported the idea of a legacy provision which would allow neighborhoods to maintain their existing 10 ft. or 5 ft. setbacks after the new side yard setbacks are established. Mr. Evenson commented he and his neighbor have adjoining garages and their setbacks work well. He endorsed keeping the existing 10 ft. or 5 ft. setbacks. Mr. Laden said he would like to change the side yard setbacks to 10 ft. or 7 ft. to make it consistent. He thought it would make more sense to change the setback to 7 ft. rather than 7.5 ft. Chair Tralle agreed with Mr. Reinert's recommendation to increase the side yard setback to 10 ft. because he noted with the 7.5 ft. setback it is difficult to drive your car around to the back of your house without driving onto your neighbor's property. Mr. Grochala stated 7.5 ft. side yard setbacks have been utilized in a few developments. He expressed concern with having several neighborhoods throughout the City with varying side yard setbacks. Mr. Laden supported the idea of creating a legacy provision, but he was unsure how the provision would logistically work. Mr. Grochala explained the City Attorney would assist the City with the wording of the legacy provision. He noted the provision would likely specify the side yard setbacks for new construction after a particular date would be 7.5 ft. Mr. Laden asked if the legacy provision would include accessory buildings. Ms. Larsen said side yard setbacks for accessory structures would remain at 5 ft. Mr. Laden recommended a 7 ft. side yard setback for accessory and primary buildings. Mr. Grochala asked if the 7.5 ft. side yard setback for accessory structures would apply to the neighborhoods with 10 ft. and 5 ft. setbacks. Mr. Laden said it would not apply as those neighborhoods would be covered by the legacy provision. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 11 Mr. Grochala commented this will create problems and likely will not be well received by the public. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend changing the side yard setbacks for new primary and accessory buildings to 7.5 ft. while current side yard will remain unchanged. Motion was supported by Mr. Reinert. Motion carried 4 — 1. Chair Tralle abstained. Porch Depth Board Comments Mr. Wipperfurth commented he has two adirondack chairs and a small table on this 6 ft. porch and there is still plenty of space remaining. Mr. Laden asked if his porch has a railing. Mr. Wipperfurth said his porch does not have a railing. He recalled the Board previously recommended if the building code required a railing, an 8 ft. porch would be required. Mr. Wipperfurth supported the recommendation. Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to recommend an 8 ft. porch depth if a railing is required and a 6 ft. porch depth if a railing is not required. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Board Discussion Mr. Laden commented single family homes do not require a porch. Mr. Grochala explained porches are required on single family homes in R-2 districts. Since the City allowed the developer to create 62 ft. wide lots, the City specified the garage either had to be positioned sideways with a decorative front facing the street or a decorative garage door and a porch was required if the garage was faced the street. These specifications were purely aesthetic. Mr. Laden recommended disregarding the porch size. Ms. Larsen stated City staff wants to adjust the code so it is easier for everyone to understand and for staff to administer. 6 ft. porch depth was recommended by City staff because the previous three developments requested 6 ft. She cautioned the Board, if they proceed with the motion, they will be prohibiting residents who have a 6 ft. porch from installing a railing. Mr. Evenson commented since variances were granted for 6 ft. porch depths, the Board should be consistent and adjust the ordinance accordingly. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 2021 Page 12 Mr. Laden said it is a silly to require houses to have porches. If the City is concerned about snub nose garages, he recommended implementing a rule which states the house or porch has to be set back 2 ft. back from the garage. He noted, from a design perspective, the porch requirement is highly restrictive. Mr. Wipperfurth asked if administering the 6 ft. and 8 ft. porch depths would be difficult for staff. Mr. Grochala said it is a concern for staff. After listening to the discussion, Mr. Wipperfurth recommended a 6 ft. porch depth. He noted he would like to simplify the ordinance and make it less complicated for staff. Mr. Reinert withdrew his MOTION to recommend an 8 ft. porch depth if a railing is required and a 6 ft. porch depth if a railing is not required. Mr. Wipperfurth made a MOTION to recommend a minimum porch depth of 6 ft. on lots with a width of 62 ft. in the R-2 district. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Board Discussion Mr. Laden said he would vote no on the motion because porches should not be required on houses. He commented there are other ways a builder could make the homes architecturally interesting. Mr. Reinert said he would vote no on the motion because he did not think simplifying the porch depth requirement to 6 ft. in the R-2 district was the best solution. Motion carried 3 — 2. Chair Tralle abstained. B. Proiect Updates Staff provided verbal updates to the Board on current City projects. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Vojtech. Motion carried 5 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. Respectfully submitted, Janele Waterman, Community Development Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE Katie Larsen, City Planner December 8, 2021 REQUEST: MTO Properties-Thrivent Financial 1. Final Plat 2. Site & Building Plan Review CASE NUMBER: FP2021-005 SP2021-003 APPLICANT: MTO Properties Attn: Ben 011ila 3747 White Bear Avenue North White Bear Lake, MN 55110 OWNER: Ben 011ila and Mike Trudeau 4486 1191h Circle NE Blaine, MN 55449 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: November 12, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: January 11, 2022 120-Day Review Deadline: March 12, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: November 30, 2021 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 8, 2021 City Council Work Session: January 3, 2022 City Council Meeting: January 10, 2022 BACKGROUND The applicant, MTO Properties, is final platting a 1 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 2,873 sf commercial office building for Thrivent Financial. The name of the final plat is MTO Properties Addition. The Land Use Application is for the following: 1 oo Final Plat o Outlot A, Rice Lake Estates 0o Site & Building Plan Review o Commercial office building This staff report is based on the following information: oo MTO Properties-Thrivent Financial Narrative oo Certificate of Survey and Tree Inventory/Removals prepared by EG Rud & Sons dated November 11, 2021 oo Civil Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated November 19, 2021 oo Architectural Plan Set prepared by Progressive Architecture dated November 12, 2021 oo Landscape Plan Set prepared by Calyx Design Group received on November 11, 2021 oo Site Drainage Narrative and Calculation prepared by Plowe Engineering dated November 5, 2021 oo Soil Borings prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated November 5, 2021 oo Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC dated June 26, 2019 oo Final Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons received on November 11, 2021 ANALYSIS History The subject site is legally described as Outlot A, Rice Lake Estates. The outlot was platted in 1984 and zoned for commercial development. The original commercial concept was a convenience store. In 1996, Council approved a site plan and conditional use permit for a Lino Lakes Family Dentistry to build a dentist office on the site. That project never moved forward. Existing Site Conditions The one (1) acre site is located in the southwest corner of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and Blue Heron Drive. The site is currently vacant commercial land with grass and light wooded area. The site consists of poorly graded sands and poorly graded sands with silt. The recorded water table is 881.90EL. Topography is general flat. Wetlands exist on the northwest end of the site. Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned NB, Neighborhood Business District and allows for office business - general as a permitted use. The City's zoning map shows the parcel with a PDO, Planned Development Overlay; however, rezoning Ordinance No. 09-88 states "All of the subdivision of Rice Lake Estates except Outlot A" shall be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The zoning map shall be corrected with the City's upcoming zoning map and ordinance update currently being drafted. Current Zoning NB, Neighborhood Business Current Land Use Vacant Commercial Future Land Use per CP Commercial Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future 2040 Land Use North GB, General Vacant Commercial Commercial Business South R-IX, Single Single Family Low Density Family Executive Residential Residential East GB General Commercial & Commercial Business Industrial R-IX, Single Open Space & Open Space & West Family Executive Single Family Single Family Residential Residential Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development and zoning code requirements for NB, Neighborhood Business as detailed below. Blocks and Lots Outlot A was preliminary platted in 1984 for commercial development. The proposed final plat contains Lot 1, Block 1, MTO Properties Addition. Parcel Acres Purpose Lot 1, Block l 1.02 Commercial Building Streets and Alleys No new streets are required for the commercial development. Driveway ingress/egress will be from Blue Heron Drive, a local road. CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) is an A -Minor Expander road. Both roads are capable of handling traffic from the commercial office building. An existing 10 ft wide Roadway and Utility Easement is recorded over the northeast portion of the lot. This area is now being dedicated on the final plat. No additional street right-of-way is required. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along the lot lines. A minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland. It does not appear the northwest corner of the wetland is covered by a full 10 ft and this shall be revised. A drainage and utility easement is required over the stormwater pond facilities. These easements shall be shown on the preliminary plat and final plat. Public Land Dedication The City will collect a cash fee of $2,570.40 in lieu of land dedication for commercial development for Lot 1, Block 1, MTO Properties Addition. Otter Crossing 1.02 acres x $2,520 per acre = $2,570.40 Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,873 sf commercial office building for Thrivent Financial. The site plan includes a paved parking lot, commercial building, landscaping and outdoor patio area adjacent to the stormwater pond and wetland. Overall, the proposed commercial building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Lot Size and Setbacks The parcel is an existing outlot platted in 1984. M Min Corner Lot Width 100 ft 118 ft Setbacks -Street Required Proposed Principal Building -Hodgson (arterial) 40 ft 41 ft Principal Building -Blue Heron (local) 30 ft 150 ft Parking Lot 15 ft 31 and 20 ft Setbacks -Side Yard (south) Required Proposed Principal Building 35a ft 38 ft Accessory Building (trash enclosure) 10 ft 20 ft Parking Lot/Driveway 10 ft 26 ft Setbacks -Rear Yard Required Proposed Principal Building 30 ft 133 ft Accessory Building (trash enclosure) 10 ft 235 ft Parking Lot/Driveway 10 ft 235 ft aNB District requires a 35 setback from Residential District Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials The commercial building is single story with exterior materials consisting of hardi-plank lap board siding, shingles, glass, EFIS, standing seam metal roof, and wood timbers. The color palette consists of earth tone pearl gray, black oak, off white and ebony. Wood timbers also accent the building. The ordinance allows for stucco or EFIS on no more than 30% of the primary front building elevation and no more than 60% of any side or rear building elevation. The primary front elevation facing Hodgson Road has 19% EIFS that is 3 ft above the ground level. There is no other EFIS on the building. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. The building height is 23 ft to the top of the highest roofline which is less than that maximum 35 ft allowed. 5 A trash enclosure is proposed on the south side of the parking lot. Construction details provided on Sheet Al.1 indicate timber or trek decking material to match the timber accent trusses. The enclosure is 6 ft in height and 80% opaque. The trash enclosure meets performance standards. Per Sheet A1.0, Site Plan, two (2) condensers units are shown on the south side of the building and a transformer pad is shown on the south side of the parking lot. These mechanical equipment components shall be fully screened by coniferous plantings or solid fence. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. As stated in the applicant's narrative, the intention of the entire development is to be a transitional element between the commercial buildings along Hodgson and the residential areas on the west side of the parcel. The aesthetic treatment of the building mass, transitional materials selected and attention to placement of filtering elements all have been designed with a "low key" transition from commercial to residential in mind. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. Page M, the site photometric plan, shows 2 light poles in the parking lot that are 19 ft tall with downlit and cutoff light fixtures. The light poles and fixtures meet ordinance requirements. Off -Street Parking Requirements Per City Code Section 1007.044(6), office buildings require 3 spaces plus at least 1 space per 200 sf of floor area. The building is 2,873 sf which would require 17 stalls. Per Sheet A1.0, the site plan provides 20 parking stalls with one being accessible. Parking requirements are met. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Site Drainage Narrative and Calculation report dated November 5, 2021 prepared by Plowe Engineering, the existing drainage area is 1.02 acres in size that consists of an existing wetland in the northwest corner of the site. The majority of this runoff in the area (approx. 0.81 acres) enters this wetland while the remaining runoff (approx. 0.21 acres) goes to Blue Heron Drive in the south. Per the preliminary boring logs from Haugo, the site consists of poorly graded sands (SP) and poorly graded sands with silt (SP-SM). Grading throughout the site is performed to direct the majority of the stormwater runoff to the northwest as it currently drains. To treat the runoff, infiltration was evaluated and Con with the recorded water table of 881.90 (the infiltration area), an infiltration basin with a bottom of 888.50 was designed. The bottom of the basin is chosen so it can achieve the sufficient 3-foot separation from the water table. The proposed stormwater management facility has been reviewed by the City Engineer and RCWD for compliance for water quality treatment and runoff control. These requirements are met with only a few minor revisions required to the civil plans. Public Utilities The new commercial office building will be municipally served by a 10" PVC sanitary sewer and a 16" DIP watermain located along Blue Heron Drive. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards Per the November 30, 2021 Environmental Staff Report: The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The plan calls for removals of 59 trees, 58 of which will not require mitigation because they are in the Basic Use Area and not in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. One tree is in a Natural Resource Conservation Area and will require 2 mitigation trees to be planted. Preservation and mitigation standards have not been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs 27,250 sq.ft. of open space calls for: 14 large trees and 42 large shrubs Provided: 14 large tree equivalents and 0 large shrubs There are 5 existing trees (cottonwoods) that will be credited as 11 large trees. Existing trees are credited at the following rates: 7 Existing Tree Value deciduous deciduous deciduous trees trees under trees between over 12" DBH {�" DBH or 6"-12" DBH Tree Size or evergreen evergreen or evergreen trees over 20' trees under trees between tall. 12' tall 12'-20' tal Tree I large tree ? large trees lame trees Value 3 large tree equivalents are included in open space landscaping. Siberian elms and trees that were not identified to species will not receive existing tree credit. Open areas landscape standards have not been met. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. Buffer and/or screen will be required between the parking lot and right-of-way along Hodgson Road and between 6681 Blue Heron Drive and the project site. Also, the buffering shrubs cannot be planted under tree canopy as shown in the landscape plan. The row of plants between the parking lot and right-of-way needs to be a double row of triangulated plants. The row of Techny arborvitae between 6681 Blue Heron Drive and the project site would meet requirements, but they cannot be planted under tree canopy. Buffers and screens as planned do not meet the requirements. Canopy Cover The purpose of this requirement is to mitigate the effects of vehicular hardscape by establishing tree canopy cover to intercept rainfall, protect pavement from sun deterioration, reduce the heat island effect, and improve aesthetics. Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Vehicular hardscape planned: 5,800 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 2,320 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 1,925 sq. ft. The 3 large trees near the future parking lot add 1,800 sq. ft. of canopy cover. The crabapple near the accessible parking space is worth 125 sq. ft. N. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs The applicable building faces are the northeast and southeast sides, which are approximately 90 ft. and 40 ft. respectively. The foundation plantings required: Northeast side: 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs Southeast side: 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs The plans indicate: Northeast side: 0 large trees and 3 large shrub equivalents Southeast side: 1 large tree equivalent and 6 large shrubs equivalents The foundation landscape requirements have not been met for the northeast building face. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The area at the base of the infiltration basin will be seeded with MN DOT 33-261 stormwater mix. The rest of the site will be turf sod, aside from an area northwest of the infiltration basin that is scheduled for native seeding, though the mix is not specified. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are not required for commercial developments; however, several existing and new trees are located along both Hodgson Road and Blue Heron Drive. I Signage Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument and wall signs. Sign permit applications are required for all temporary signs as well. Impervious Surface Coverage This parcel is in the Shoreland District of Rice Lake and the allowed impervious surface coverage is 60%. Sheet A1.0 notes the proposed impervious at 24%. Impervious surface requirements are met. Traffic Study A formal traffic study is not required. Blue Heron Drive is a local road and CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) is an A -Minor Expander road. Per the applicant, the new Thrivent Financial building will support 5 advisors and 3 office staff. The number of clients visiting the site ranges from 10-30 per day with an average of 15 per day. Both roads have capacity for a 2,873 sf commercial office building, staff and clients. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is not within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. No environmental assessment is required for a 2,873 sf commercial office building. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was completed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC on June 26, 2019. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on August 26, 2021. One 0.015 acre wetland area was delineated within the project area. This wetland meadow/shrub swamp was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and tussock sedge (Carex stricta). No impacts to this wetland are proposed. This wetland is part of the Wetland Management Corridor, so a vegetated buffer with an average of 50 ft. and a minimum width of 25 ft. will be required per Rice Creek Watershed District rules. A minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland. It does not appear the northwest corner of the wetland is covered by a full 10 ft and this shall be revised. 10 Shoreland District The site is in the Shoreland Management District Overlay of Rice Lake. Rice Lake is categorized as a Natural Environment Lake. Impervious surface coverage for a commercial development cannot exceed 60%. The proposed commercial building is 24% impervious. Required setback from the OHWL is 150 ft. The proposed building is 200+ft from the OHWL. Shoreland district requirements are met. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department is reviewing the final plat and will provide comment. Public Safety Comments Deputy Director L'Allier notes a hydrant shall be located near the Fire Department Connector (FDC). The Police Division reviewed the plans and had no issues that needed to be addressed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their November 30, 2021 meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. City Attorney The applicant shall submit an updated title commitment (within 3 months) and the City Attorney shall review the title commitment and final plat prior to Council approval of the final plat. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. 11 Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City as it relates to the MTO Properties Addition final plat. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement will be drafted by the City as is relates to the Thrivent Financial office building. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP's such as curb, gutter, and stormwater pond. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The proposed commercial office building is consistent with commercial land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the commercial office building. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. CSAH 49 (Hodgson Rd) is an A -Minor Expander and Blue Heron Road is a local road and both have structural capacity to handle the traffic volume of the commercial office building. Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan The new commercial office building will be municipally served by a 10" PVC sanitary sewer and a 16" DIP watermain located along Blue Heron Drive. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Findings of Fact -Final Plat The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board 12 recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and Not applicable. The final plat is for a commercial development. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat and site & building plan review for MTO Properties Addition and Thrivent Financial with the following conditions: 1. A conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration shall be recorded over the wetland and buffer. 2. A Development Agreement and securities related to the final plat are required. 3. A Site Performance Agreement and securities related to the construction of the commercial office building are required. 4. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. 5. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon and wall signage. 6. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage. The following comments shall be addressed before the final plat is released: 1. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated December 1, 2021 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator Memo dated November 30, 2021 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department (to follow) shall be addressed. 13 4. The applicant shall submit an updated title commitment (within 3 months) and the City Attorney shall review the title commitment and final plat prior to Council approval of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall draft a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities for the private stormwater maintenance facility. 6. A conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration shall be drafted for City review and comment. a. The documents shall include both RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes as parties. 7. The Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations Report shall include the name of company and professional engineer that wrote it. 8. All applicable plan sheets: a. Plan sheets note a 10 ft wide trail on the southeast corner of the site. Please confirm if this is actually a trail. If it is not, please remove the comment from all sheets. 9. Sheet TO, Title Page: a. The 1Oft wide trail shall be shown as a removal if it actually exists. 10. Final Plat a. A drainage & utility easement is required 10 ft beyond the stormwater management facility's 100-year storm high water level elevation. b. The drainage & utility easement shall be at least 10 ft beyond the delineated wetland boundary. c. The drainage & utility easement over the wetland shall not cut through the side yard easements. 11. Sheet ALL, Site Plan: a. The Site Plan notes 10,731 sf of hardcover and the Drainage Plan notes 10,873 sf. These notes shall be consistent. b. The building setback shall be measured from the Roadway Easement line. 12. Sheet A2.1, Floor Plan: a. The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be shown on the floor plan. 13. Sheet C2, Utility Plan: a. The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be shown on the building. b. A fire hydrant near the FDC shall be provided. 14. Sheet L.1, Landscape Plan: a. Callout boxes with species and plant count shall be included for all plantings. b. All ground mounted mechanical equipment components (transformer and HVAC units) shall be fully screened by coniferous plantings or solid fence. c. A 6 ft high fence may be required along the south side of the parking lot if the required canopy cover trees and proposed buffer row conflict. d. The Landscape Plan shall be dated. 14 ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. City Engineer Memo dated December 1, 2021 3. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated November 30, 2021 4. Applicant Narrative 5. Thrivent Financial Architecture Plan Sheets and Site Plan 6. MTO Grading Plan and Utility Plan 7. Landscape Plan 8. Final Plat 15 �., � ate.. r - -• JW .; `; �• ;) I Ilk rF = , •o ,�;�� a � - .. ��'• tea, - _ Q,. 2 0 0 U' z W CO W 0 a 00 00 LO CD 0 N W D W W W af F- W M W 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: December 1, 2021 Re: MTO Properties — Thrivent Financial Final Plat & Plan Review 019406-000 WSB has reviewed the Final Plat and Civil Plans for the MTO Properties — Thrivent Financial site plan in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. and Progressive Architecture received on November 12, 2021. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and documents: DO MTO Properties Addition Plat prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated November 11, 2021 00 MTO Properties Addition Civil and Landscape plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc., dated November 11, 2021 oo Thrivent MTO Properties Architectural & Site Plan Review plans prepared by Progressive Architecture, dated November 12, 2021 00 Draft Soil Borings Logs prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services, dated November 5, 2021 00 Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations dated November 5, 2021 and revised November 19, 2021 Engineering • Grading The MTO Properties Addition plans include site grading for the proposed building, parking lot, and the stormwater pond. Comments: 1. Applicant to show existing contours 100-ft beyond the site. 2. Applicant to update gaps in existing contours that can be seen on sheet C1.2 (i.e. 884 — 890 contours north of the site by the wetland, 888 and 890 contours southeast of site). • Stormwater Management Most of the stormwater on the site flows to an existing wetland northwest of the site. The rest of the stormwater on the site flows to the south to Blue Heron Drive. The stormwater from the site ultimately flows to Rice Lake. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 2 After the proposed improvements, the surface water will flow to a proposed infiltration basin on the north side of the site. Storm sewer is proposed to collect water from the parking lot and then direct it to the proposed infiltration basin. The infiltration basin is designed to provide water quality treatment and rate control. The proposed basin includes an upstream rain guardian and forebay for pre-treatment. The infiltration basin's emergency overflow will discharge to the existing wetland north of the site. After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 10,873 square feet of new impervious surfaces including the sidewalks, patios, parking lot, and rooftop. Based on the draft soil boring information, the groundwater elevation in the area of the basin is 881.90. Soils consist of poorly graded sands and poorly graded sands with silt. The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer conveyance system and basin. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year rainfall events. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Wetland Blue Heron Drive Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year Pre- 0.14 0.57 2.05 0.06 0.28 0.98 Development Post- 0.05 0.40 1.64 0.06 0.17 0.47 Development Post -development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre -development rates. Comments: 1. Provide name of company that prepared the drainage report and calculations on those documents. 2. The proposed model uses a post -construction CN value of 61 for disturbed pervious areas. A post -construction CN value of 74 should be used for disturbed pervious areas in Type B soils per City Ordinance 1011.011 Table 1. 3. Applicant to confirm the low floor and low entry free board requirements for infiltration basins from City Ordinance 1011.011 Table 5 are met. 4. Provide hard armoring (e.g. riprap) or other permanent erosion control measures beyond established turf for the emergency overflow from the infiltration basin. 5. Applicant to provide information on the pretreatment for stormwater draining to the wetland. 6. Applicant to provide additional grading information (e.g. drainage arrows, spot elevations) to show that the entire parking lot drains to the Rain Guardian. 7. Applicant to provide calculations in the drainage report to show that a single Rain Guardian can convey flow from the entire parking lot with a 10-yr Rational Method analysis. • Water Supply There is existing 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain located along Blue Heron Drive and Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) adjacent to the site. MTO Properties — Thrivent Financial Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 3 The applicant is proposing a 6-inch diameter PVC water service to serve the proposed building. The water service will connect into an existing stub from Blue Heron Drive and will be located under the parking lot. Comments: 1. The City of Lino Lakes does not allow PVC water services. 2. Applicant to verify fire suppression needs. A hydrant flow test may be required. 3. The Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire division will require that a fire hydrant is installed near the proposed building. • Sanitary Sewer There is an existing 10-inch diameter poly -vinyl chloride (PVC) located along Blue Heron Drive and Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) adjacent to the site. The applicant is proposing a 6-inch diameter PVC sanitary service to serve the proposed building. The sanitary service will connect into an existing stub from Blue Heron Drive and will be located under the parking lot. Staff do not have any comments at this time. • Transportation This site is located at the southwest corner of Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and Blue Heron Drive. The entrance to the parking lot is located on Blue Heron Drive and is proposed to be 25-ft wide from the back of curb to the back of curb. Blue Heron Drive is a local road and Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) is a county state aid highway. Both roads can accommodate the traffic from this development. A specific Traffic Study was not completed for the proposed site. Staff do not have any comments at this time. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Jacobson Environmental, PLLC (Jacobson) delineated the wetlands on site in June of 2018. There is one wetland located on the north side of the site. The wetland is a Type 2/6 wet meadow/ shrub swamp and is approximately 0.015 acres. The project area is within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) and is located within the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP). Comments: 1. Applicant to include a vegetated buffer with an average width of 50 ft and a minimum width of 25 ft as required per Rice Creek Watershed District rules. A minimum 10-ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland. • Landscaping The applicant is proposing to establish turf on the site with turf sod and native grass seeds. MTO Properties — Thrivent Financial Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 4 Comments: 1. Native grass seed mixes shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes Native Plant Establishment Policy. This policy is included in Division 2 of the City of Lino Lakes Standard Specifications. • Floodplain The property is not shown within the current FEMA floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements The Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) right-of-way varies between 100-ft and 125-ft wide and the Blue Heron right-of-way is 50-ft wide. Drainage and utility easements are proposed to be 10-ft wide around the property lines and a drainage and utility easement is proposed in the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the existing wetland. Comments: 1. A Drainage and Utility Easement shall be platted around the footprint of the proposed Infiltration Basins. 2. A minimum 10-ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland where not already covered by the D&U for the infiltration basin. 00 Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. 00 Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. co Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The applicant is required to execute a declaration for stormwater maintenance. 00 Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Rice Creek Watershed Permit 4. Anoka County Right -of -Way Permit (possibly needed for traffic control or construction related activities) If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. MTO Properties — Thrivent Financial Engineering Review Ile CITY OF LQ� KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Environmental Memo Date: 11-30-21 Re: Environmental Board Comments/November 30t", 2021/MTO Properties Addition-Thrivent Financial The Environmental Board, at their November 30th meeting, had the following recommendations for MTO Properties Addition-Thrivent Financial: 1. A Natural Heritage Information System request must be submitted to the DNR to identify any rare, threatened, or endangered species that have been documented within one mile of the site. 2. Exposed soils must be stabilized within 7 days due to proximity to an impaired water (Rice Lake). This must be noted in the plans. 3. Preservation and Mitigation standards require 2 additional trees to be planted. Consider oaks in the turf area between the building and Hodgson Road. 4. Open area landscape standards require an additional 42 large shrubs to be planted in open areas. 5. Buffer and screen requirements have not been met. A double row of triangulated plants is needed for the area between the parking lot and right-of-way on Hodgson Road. Also, plants should not be planted under future tree canopy. A fence might be a better option to screen the project site from 6681 Blue Heron Drive. 6. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. An additional 395 sq. ft. of canopy coverage is required. 7. Foundation landscape standards have not been met. An additional 2 large trees and 3 large shrubs will be required for the northeast building face. • Page 1 8. A seed mix must be specified for the area scheduled for native grass seed northwest of the infiltration pond. This should be a mix that includes forbs as well. 9. Mulch should be type 3, with MCIA tags provided to the city at time of install. 10. Rolled erosion control product shall be category 25 natural net, per city standard specifications. • Page 2 MTO PROPERTIES - THRIVENT FINANCIAL NARRATIVE 11.8.21 MTO properties is developing a 1.02 acre parcel, located on the North East intersection of Hodgson Road and Blue Herron Drive. The site is presently, undeveloped, with 0.01 acres of wetland and 0.2 acres Row easement. Total size of parcel is 1.02 Acres or 44, 258 Square Feet. Existing overstory vegetation is predominately Cottonwood Trees. The parcel is zoned NB — Neighborhood Business. The structure will house a local Thriven Financial Office. Business uses, are an approved use in the NB zoning district. All setbacks for the NB zoning district are met, including the special provision for a 35'-0" neighboring residential setback. All setbacks are also met for the parking area. The building footprint is 2873 square feet in size. The parking requirements for a facility this size is 17 stalls. 20 Stalls are provided, for the facility. The total hard surface consisting of building, parking paving, curbing, sidewalks, patio, and trash enclosure is 10,731 square feet or 24.24 % hard surface. This is below the 65% maximum hard surface requirement required by zoning. The storm water will be treated with a ponding element on the north side of the building structure. The drainage is currently in the Rice Creek, approval process. Please refer to the Drainage Narrative for additional information. A 6" PVC watermain will feed the building from an existing stub off Blue Heron Drive. A 6" Sanitary sewer line will attach to an existing sanitary off of Blue Heron as well. The building will be sprinklered, as required by the city. The building exteriors consists of a blend of Faux Stone, EIFS, Hardy Board Lap siding, Metal Siding, and timber structures. The roofs have varying pitches and are anticipated to be architectural — asphalt shingles and a complimenting color standing seam metal roofing (budget permitting). Colors of materials are shown in the exterior elevations, and are predominantly natural tones. The building is a slab on grade wood framed structure with pitched roofs. The height to the tallest point on the entire structure is 21'-1" to finished floor or an approximate of height of 23'-6" to grade, this is lower than the NB zoning maximum height of 35'-0". The soffit facia height is approximately 10'-0" above the floor line, this is intended to give the structure a slightly larger or commercial profile without overwhelming the residential neighborhood. The building will have one main entry on the South and another entry / exit to the patio on the north. Both entry/ exit points will be ADA accessible. The site is to have two auxiliary structures a monument sign. The monument sign will have a base constructure of materials consistent with the main building. The sign will be by a separate permit, so size, lettering, lighting etc. will be reviewed at the time of the signage permitting. The second auxiliary structure is to be a trash enclosure. The Structure will be constructed of larger timbers and galvanized metal tubing. The timbers will have color and stain matching the timber elements complementing the main building. The intention of the entire development is to be a transitional element between the commercial buildings along Hodgson and the residential areas on the West side of the parcel. The aesthetic treatment of the building mass, transitional materials selected and attention to placement of filtering elements all have been designed with a "low key" transition from commercial to residential in mind. rI ,a v 401 '44. f Jl ♦ 7 }- �- 49 : F � .':. { ■ ram:.,, _ .+" Ar 1r di fill- AT liolw 1 f y x 4L r ryl A cw_ IIII�• � _ m ? W. t �I-c , W A iiiiiiiiiio G i SITE PLAN 1 " = 20'-0" PROJECT TEAM OWNER/CLIENT THRIVENT - EDGEWATER TEAM 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE #160 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PRIMARY CONTACT: BEN OLLILA ben.ollila@thrivent.com 651.288.7580 ARCHITECT PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE 4920 OTTER LAKE ROAD WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 SCOTT MOWER smower@progressivearch.com LANALARSON Ilarson@progressivearch.com 651-292-1061 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DUPRE CONSULTING HUDSON, WI NORM DUPRE 651-468-6581 NDUPRE.CONSULTING@GMAIL.COM CIVIL ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING 6776 LAKE DR. STE#110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 CHUCK PLOWE chuck@plowe.com 651-361-8233 SURVEYOR RUDD SURVEYING 6776 LAKE DRIVE STE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 JASON RUDD JRUD@ERUDSURVEYING.COM 763-786-6007 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEN HARTBERG PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HANNAHLoPRESTO DESIGNER & MARKETING LEAD 13 SdE:I:1R1111.1 SITE MATERIALS MATERIAL SQUARE FT. PAVING 5997 CURBING 112 TRASh ENCL05URE 72 51 DEWALK/FATIO I G77 SUB -TOTAL 7858 BUILDING 5Q.FT. 2673 TOTAL IID5URF. 10,731 24.240 TOTAL LOT 51ZE 44,258 PARKING SPACE REQUIRED ::M SPACE REQ. D' OFFICE USE SPACES REQ. D' BUILDING 2873 SQUARE FT. 1 /200 14.3G ADDITIONAL 5FACE5 REQUIRED 3.0 TOTAL SPACES REQU I RED 17.3 G SPACES PROVIDED ACCE551BLE STANDARD 9'x 18' 19 TOTAL SPACES 20 * LOADING AREA 15 CONCRETE WALK ADJACENT TO ACC. SPACE SIC CC RE NC 11 /11 /2021 10:15:45 AM A1.1 3 TRASH EAST 1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 /4" = 1'-0" 5 A1.1 4 A1.1 TRASH NORTH 1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH SOUTH 1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE NOTES; 1 THE TRASH SIZE MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON THE CONTAINER DIMENSIONS 2 TIMBERS SHOWN ARE TO MATCH COLOR WITH THE TIMBER STRUCTURE IN THE MAIN ENTRY. ELEVATION KEYNOTES NUMBER DESCRIPTION 11 325 TIMBER OR TREK (OR 51M) DECKING MATERIAL TO MATCH 3 19 53G METAL CORNER SUPPORT POST, PAINTED BLACK TO MATCH ADJ. MATERIALS. TRASH WEST 1/2" = 1'-0" SK cc RE NC 11/10/2021 4:38:04 PM 1 FIRST FLR PLAN 1 /4„ = 1'-011 GENERAL NOTES 1. VERIFY CONDITIONS NOTED AS EXIST. AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. PATCH EXIST SURFACES DAMAGED OR ALTERED BY THIS WORK WITH MATERIALS TO MATCH EXIST ADJACENT SURFACES. COORDINATE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH LOW VOLTAGE SUPPLIERS, ON LOCATION OF TELEVISIONS, COMPUTERS AND WIRELESS CHARGING STATIONS. PROVIDE BACKING WHERE REQ'D TO SUPPORT WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ARE FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD, SHEATHING OR OTHER STRUCTURAL ELEMENT, UON. 4. DIMENSIONS PROVIDED FROM EXISTING BUILDING COMPONENTS ARE FROM FACE OF FINISH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. INTERIOR FINISHES ARE TYP. LVT FOR PRIMARY TRAVEL AREAS, OFFICES AND CONE. RM. ARE TO BE MODULAR CARPETING. ALL RESTROOMS TO HAVE FLOOR AND WALL TILE TO 46" AFF ON ALL WALLS. G. METAL TRIMMED OPEN GLAZED TEMP GLASS DIVIDERS ARE SHOWN AT THIS TIME. UTILIZE TRANSWALL OR DIRTT WALL SYSTEM OR SIMILAR. GC TO INVESTIGATE OPTIONS. 7. ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE FINALIZED BY ARCHITECT $ CLIENT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. IMAGES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AT THIS TIME. 9. ITEMS NOT SHOWN BUT TO BE FINALIZED BY CLIENT AND GC INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LOW VOLTAGE, SECURITY, WINDOW TREATMENTS, PA OR MUSIC SYSTEM, FINAL RCP PLAN AND GENERAL INTERIOR * EXTERIOR LIGHTING. SOME ACCENT / DECORATIVE INTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE INCLUDED A5 WELL. ROOM SCHEDULE NUMBED NAME ARE 59 CIRCULATION 272.3 SF 100 VESTIBULE G7.7 51' 101 RECEPTION 325.4 SF 102 CONF2 1 13.4 5F 103 RE5TRM 1 75.9 SF 104 WORK5T. (2x) 153.3 SF 105 COPY/STO 74.4 SF I OG MECH G3.0 SF 107 OFFICE 3 12 1.1 51' 108 OFFICE 4 123.4 SF 109 OFFICE 5 1 17.7 SF 1 10 BREAK ROOM 475.0 SF 1 1 1 STORAGE 40.G SF 1 12 RE5TRM2 87.3 51' 1 13 OFFICE 2 99.8 SF 1 14 OFFICE 1 95.9 51' 1 15 CONE 1 154.2 SF TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR BUILDING (INCLUDING VESTIBULE) IS 2,873. NOTE: BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED WITH NO ATTIC SPACE. "mJ NORTH SK CC RE NC 11/10/2021 4:38:08 PM SOUTH 1 /4" = 1'-0" 9riu 96'-0" EAST -FACING HODGSON RD. 1 /4" = 1'-0" ELEVATION KEYNOTES NUMBER DESCRIPTION 303 HAKDI PLANK LAP BOARD 51DING-PEARL GRAY 305 GAF TIMBERLINE GRAND CANYON SHINGLES -BLACK OAK 3OG AL STOREFRONT GL, TEMP 31 1 OFF WHITE EFI5 - LIGHTLY EXP05ED AGGREGATE 3 1 2 PAC -CLAD 5TANDING SEAM METAL ROOF -MATTE BLACK 3 1 3 CORANADO FAUX DRY STACKED 5TONE-5AWTOOTH LEDGE/NOKTHLAND 3 1 9 WOOD TIMBERS, WIEXP05ED BLK. METAL GU55ET PLATES AND FIXTURES 329 PAC -CLAD METAL BOX RIB #3/4 COMBO, WEATHERED ZINC 545 MAKVIN EXTERIOR WINDOWS -EXTERIOR FINISH/EBONY INTERIOR FINISH/EBONY EXTERIOR MATERIALS - SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKOUT KEYNOTE NUMBER EA5T WE5T NORTH 5OUTH 303 N/A 588/5G% 188/3G% 106/ 15% 3 1 1 2 2 7/ 19 % N/A N/A N/A 313 208/ 16% N/A N/A 150/21 % 319 24/2% N/A 200139% 25/4% 329 327/27% 196/ 19% N/A 327/46% SUB -TOTAL ELE 19187 13039 388 610 545 - WINDOW 401 /34% 255/25% 130/25% 96/ 14% 11/10/2021 4:38:55 PM OMMIMIMIAk - ' ME MIS :lmff9jF.! 1. if v 7� re- F S � I I I A A W i ws1low , ,. -J �! i 1p 885.0 EWETI-10 CPCP r A�� 10' WIDE EOF = 889.80 . 891x3 °o o SILT FENCE INSTALL SEED WITH \ r 'Gp Jar (T1(P, ) STABILIZATION �9 t EDGE OF DELINEATED BLANKET \ 0.'.• S0�9 \ WETLAND AS LOCATED ON JUNE 23, 2020. 88.9 1� 1A pis 886.0 "jam 886. $ 9'.. SETIP41578 EWE -9 It'\WMON 3jd$•_ I) KM PT9�/ TOTAL DISTURBED AREA ° ° \ /8�90050 \\l 91. n[� r+ � •'•. i r 0.82 ACRES �1CYFAFK S TB ° �- 4 ss . x Is, \ r tiG 891.3 OPO W�' y1� 3 I NG BLDBA \ \ 891.2 x \ 2T / 1593 / 887.5 '0 5 i 886.9 TREE-10 J \ r X r WETI-7 � m .3 f'Q� \ \ ;:8 8 E 10 $�5 °°° A $9 #��a890.50 I a $ �� \\ \ x890.8 r \ Tt3P AS9.2BER J�C`c m 9888.9\ \ m 0 V As Know what's below. Call before you dig. SITE SEQUENCING • PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED - COORDINATE WITH OWNER) AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. (CONTACT CITY TO INSPECT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO GRADING OPERATIONS, IF NECESSARY.) ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SOD, SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER WHICH SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FOLLOWING MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AS MODIFIED BELOW. DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: M.Q.A. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: PROJ. NO. M.Q.A. 21-1998 ORIGINAL DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2021 Z O H d W J 0 = z o O W en 886.0 EWET1-6 00 TREE2-16 1 INp ATION SB#5 \ \ c'�, * MOW A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER 2 WEEKS DOUBLE SI o 8 9 3 �� IN (P1) ss9�°g�� \ \ r '� \ \ ** SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS w w v \ TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. W FENCE (OR EQ IV. \ O\ PERIMETEF o °'BOT 888.50 Q co\ �0 \ ' 9 �° 20 • ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS. W N CONTROL DEV CE) RUNOUT 889.00 \ r 10, so rn FOR GRADE 100 YR 889.67 SS'62oFr� Q 36, AREAS LESS T AN z \ \ \ s. 0 68 R ILI�� \ \ \ // °tio�oGFo • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES AND MAKE SURE THE EROSION NE 50 FT. FRO i a'ox8 ��h �Ati \\x890'9 x890 9 \ \Pos9� r °ssoo�°� CONTROL PRACTICES INPLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 1890.8 57 WETLAND ED E SB#4 0• 890 �8g2 62 �9°0�G \ \ \'� s O 2�o°A��t • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF "• i \ �Qf \ \ 0 �sG �� BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. SILT FENCE TO BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND UPON N m' \2c �S� r xs9o.s \ ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION. 889 6 9 m � \ ss 90 N s E 8 .0 TREEz-lo-6 B#3 \ �� \ �� • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WOOD FIBER BLANKET FOR ALL AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW AND FOR ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. - 89291Jr° Q.:.•'' °s�� 91.1; \\ \ \ 890.7 ' o L O 6 \ \ \ \ r 890.6 �(i OL.L"- a� 0 z CD i • PROTECT ALL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES FROM CONSTRUCTION RUN-OFF. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AND CONSTRUCT SAID CL_ 893.6 x 893.4: \ \ s91 3 FACILITIES ONCE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. _ X i� �'q iB B � (6 C .� � 0 V F F O q9199Z) p 0.92'7 s o • IF ANY SLOPES APPEAR TO BE FAILING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS AND EROSION `� d 8 \ M ff I ON-PT15 \ yG Z g \ f6 r �� CONTROL BLANKET AS NEEDED. CL (1) .0 2 2. rn \ ` � cn 10 co �� s 89 6 8 >° p \ \ 9S �Fp FOREBAY �%� \ • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. v W 3g a : \v.g ............. �Q N89 x888.a .0 tiG • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SOD ALL DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREAS, INCLUDING SWALES & OVERFLOWS. = rn /, °S )pB#2 PROPOSED BUILDING \\ �gQFj 10' PARK' SETBACK 888.4 _- 892.0 : 891.4 \ \ Q • UPON GRADING COMPLETION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NATIVE TOPSOIL WITH SOD OR SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A .a sss.s 1-ua O s - -- 2,873 S.F. \ c \ F / EWETl-3 -PROPOSED �RAIN�GE �1 0 892y © FFE 892.70 \°S s\\\ r STRAIGHT SET DISC WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. ?} J AND 4�' ° \ c o LLI UTILITY EASE NT-� \ �L �o0 9C'� \ s 9s yL • EXCESS SOIL SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE OTHER EXPOSED SOIL AND STABILIZED WITHIN 72 HOURS. ANY SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO HAVE 600 , . ss\ O Q a88.0 s Y SETIP41578 892.1 s-3.7 SILT FENCE PLACED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDES. _ O 0 SETIP41578 '` e o c ° o ti � G�l��'" 89�g �� .,Lp� �q°�c r , p T \ \ ch 1p (99 ��J • IF A STREET, ALLEY, SIDEWALK OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE SHOULD BECOME SOILED OR LITTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAUSE SUCH �9 ,v 2C\ y s BiTgOi�'90 o�°s 7 J- \ SOILING OR LITTERING TO BE CLEANED UP BY SWEEPING NOT LATER THAN THE END OF THE WORKING DAY IN WHICH SUCH SOILING OR s ° SFj�\° s9°•3 891.3 2184 P �Gc ql� �\ �0�` r o90 ^ LITTERING SHALL HAVE OCCURRED OR BEEN OBSERVED. Z z 892 49�S0 SB#1 / 0 O COT3=12-14-18 P \ OJT O U) z186 $91.� �$gp s 0 70. P g�: s�9� r °y� �90 �9J \ OTHER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES o y w 89z.7 0> p 9> W 0 Z COT22 . x 889.1 S \ 09 � d... (D � \ .. � cgs F'A Q = Z Q gg3,g \ CONSTRUCTION WASTE MATERIALS - ALL WASTE MATERIALS GENERATED AS A RESULT OF SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COLLECTED AND coo= Q \SJ�C ,� � /�� ti cb �91.12 co 1 r REMOVED ACCORDING TO ALL LOCAL AND/OR STATE WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS BY A LICENSED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT W CL W J A COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR WILL ENSURE THAT ALL SITE PERSONNEL ARE INSTRUCTED IN THESE PRACTICES. O °S \ ��° `o A cy BFQ V Z $ypp °°� 8 .45)s( P o \ ° �°s \ r s W W Q z 9 e� o.l $ 92.3 9 5032 PR N HAZARDOUS WASTES - ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED PROPERLY TO PREVENT SPILLS AND VANDALISM. WHEN 0 OU 9Y 69 1, ti INLET � � xs91.1 �� . ,,; °°� s91.s eb. 1 4 OTECTIO NECESSARY HAZARDOUS WASTES WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED BY LOCAL AND/OR STATE REGULATION OR BY THE 2152 '.. �0 .S% ELM8 \ 0 �5.. ,j l J g �' ti ELrIB \ r 9s of (TYP.) MANUFACTURER. Z 892E4 1��r 2151 00 ��" �( 9�' • cP� COT16 ? 892.2 �� CQ �O % / �`� � � °1O A �� \ < 9 s � � o cona 91 \. ti?3 \\ \9s�1SANITARY WASTE - ALL SANITARY WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM THE PORTABLE UNITS BY A LOCAL, LICENSED WATER MANAGEMENT 91.49 d 91.3 Q1\�i d� o Cf C�\�'T 9� r °9 tiG COMPANY, AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL REGULATION. N .......... 2150 O S coT9 8g2 8 ` rG� 6 ��QP'� \ 0' S F A �,�� / OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING - A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HELP REDUCE VEHICLE TRACKING OF j \ •� \ \ o S2 �1 a SEDIMENTS. IF A STREET, ALLEY, SIDEWALK OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE SHOULD BECOME SOILED OR LITTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARED FOR: 8 891 $ gY) \ 1p J�� JP J \ soo 9� CAUSE SUCH SOILING OR LITTERING TO BE CLEANED UP BY SWEEPING NOT LATER THAN THE END OF THE WORKING DAY IN WHICH SUCH C° cos\ o 890.�- � �2018 coT6 892, 8 \ �' s 9s �ti� SOILING OR LITTERING SHALL HAVE OCCURRED OR BEEN OBSERVED. DUMP TRUCKS HAULING LOOSE MATERIALS (SAND, TOPSOIL, ETC.) MTO PROPERTIES 7 TRASH fA� �Sh 91 �8 s �� \ !� \ y0 890� 889 TO AND/OR FROM THE SITE SHALL BE COVERED WITH A TARPAULIN. xa917 ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCH / 2��S( � \° a° x8 .a \ ,�'�' \11\\\\ ss o 6 ` VEHICLE CLEANING - NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON -SITE. EXTERNAL WASHING OF VEHICLES TO BE CONFINED TO A DEFINED . th \ ° 490.9 / \ ti I b 1 °ti� AREA ("BONE YARD") ON SITE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DESIGNATED TRUCK WASHOUT AREA WITH APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE. WASHOUT PLANS) ITEM MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES SOD 3878 SEED ** 3876 * FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT COMMERCIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY FALL COVER MNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE) SPRING/SUMMER MNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE) SOIL -BUILDING COVER MNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE) 1-2 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE) 2-5 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE) MULCH 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER 3881 WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3885 (CATEGORY 2) ° \ AREA 1J I V 13C A MINIMUM VC 50 FKVI"I U11l Mr-MrrUIVUJ, UK U 1 r1rK J I UKI°IVVA I CK FEA 1 VKCJ. ALL LIYUIU AIVU JVL1U VVAJ I C bCIVCKA 1 Cu EM STING ^ PROP. s°o °�° / $ 890 7 �� / r ��'� �o`y' \ / BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER (E.G. COMPACTED 89z.z 89 CLAY LINER IMPERMEABLE GEO-MEMBRANE) AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. In P�:: ° s918 TRANSFORMER s91. w� : �e° w ,-) 89.45 (GL) °. / PAD EL. 892.70 \..� Q•• �90.9 P� dS ��ti c ��$�� ss9.3 cb c o 91.3 Oj Q /' SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL -ALL VEHICLES WILL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKING OIL AND FLUIDS. VEHICLES LEAKING FLUIDS WILL NOT 3' TRANSITION ` / +ti�P U PROP. ��. ms 891 ° ��0 / �M H vP °yoh \ G BE ALLOWED ON -SITE. SPILL KITS WILL BE STORED ON -SITE AND ALL SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY DISCOVERY. SPENT FROM B618 CURB / Qe �� sOQ.:' / B6-12 s ��\ ° �° / 955I(GL> 0a ABSORBENT MATERIALS AND RAGS WILL BE HAULED OFF -SITE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SPILL IS CLEANED UP AND PROPERTY DISPOSED N8 1.6 FOR ENTRANCE TO / P�``� OP °� 89� CURB ° �: r 889 z OF. SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ONCE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. `..Q B612 CURB FOR / / �2 (TYP.) O 91.6 G ° 0! �cA SITE PLANNING \ / PARKING LOT 89 I �' / s° 3 _ & ENGINEERING °a do SOIL STOCKPILES INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AROUND ALL TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES. LOCATE \ (TYP) z Z$x /� , g°°,�~ PROP' g °o ° �� \ °�� p SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES SUCH THAT DOWNSLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH IS NO LESS THAN 8 M (25 FEET) FROM THE TOE OF THE PILE TO A / / I 891.9 LIGHT 92 ° o SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS GQ� �� / G ..... POLE 891.s SA s �( o�°° 0w -7 THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS, STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, (TyP) PG x89. 09 0� cV., �o o ° �O VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. DURING STREET REPAIR, COVER CONSTRUCTION SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES LOCATED 13 j°� tiPLOWE °` o 00 `b / CLOSER THAN 8 M (25 FEET) TO A ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH TARPS, AND PROTECT STORM SEWER INLETS WITH SILT SOCKS ENGINEERING INC. / oj'y i / •. �� \ / ti O� s \ T �� `. / �°� OR STAKED SILT FENCE. 890.9 o r 6776 LAKE DRIVE p� P �7/ 891.6 \ �e� / PROVIDE WIMCO (OR APPROVED EQUAL) FOR INLET PROTECTION AT ALL EXISTING STORM SEWER INLETS THAT WILL RECEIVE RUN-OFF SUITE 110 `'. 'y' / :ANSITION FROM ti ti 891.7 �0 \ u LINO LAKES, MN 55014 COT8 0 \ ROCK DURING CONSTRUCTION. INLET PROTECTION TO REMAIN IN -PLACE UNTIL AT LEAST 70 /o OF SITE VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. N `b URMOUNTABL URB RJ BLUE HER r� 891.i " °��° �Ps� O CONSTRUCTION PHONE: (651) 361-8210 5 '0 COT1 ENTRANCE FAX: (651) 361-8701 cP / RD. T B618 RB / 1 �Pti�P� i CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DESIGNATED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT AREA WITH APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE. KEEP WASHOUT AREAS AS FAR FOR ANCE SOIL AMENDMENT AREAS i Ph 9 �P� AS PRACTICAL FROM STORM DRAINS DITCHES AND PONDS DO NOT ALLOW RUN-OFF FROM THIS AREA BY CONSTRUCTING A TEMPORARY / S- 891.7 COT8 R 15.0 T / 87 891.7 > / / COT11 8T GS MATCH P� r EXISTING \ 1.1 f 889.92 P� L)� 90.9 09 9 891.2 ti PIT OR BERMED AREA LARGE ENOUGH FOR LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE. AFTER WASTE CONCRETE IS SET, BREAK-UP AND DISPOSE OF 00 �P5 / (TYP.) (DISTURBED AREAS ONLY) ?� 91EXISTING .1 t889.92 L> PROPERLY. Q NORTH 1. ON -SITE TOPSOIL TO BE STOCKPILE P5 0°�/ � 2. AFTER GRADING, LEAVE AMENDMENT AREAS ov ° \ti G ° \ ° _ THE CONTRACTOR MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, 890.9 $ 891.4 O Q� ° V REMOVE EXISTING RBA NEEDED TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. SUBCUT 8" , O S G CURB S 3. ALLEVIATE COMPACTED SOILS (PLOW OR TILL) 3 I x 3�$c�� / & INSTALL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY �\ THE CONTRACTOR MAY DISCHARGE FROM THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS TO SURFACE WATERS IF THE BASIN o� , WATER HAS BEEN VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED IN THE BASIN AND THAT NUISANCE / TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 2" 890 ENTRANCE; REPLACE EXISTING CURB CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A 4. APPLY 8" OF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL DISTURBED BEYOND ENTRANCE; ANY SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMPS, SUCH THAT THE 0 10 20 °P 5. APPLY 2.5" COMPOST MEETING: 890•7 / REPAIR OF EXISTING STREET DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. 5.1. 8-13% SOIL ORGANIC MATTER BITUMINOUS SECTION DISTURBED 5.2. PH SUITABLE FOR TURF SEEDING / � DURING CONSTRUCTION IS s�P 0 5 10 5.3. NOTE: RETAIN RECORDS & RECEIPTS FOR INCIDENTAL 1 INCH = 20 FEET ti° Pay COMPOST DELIVERED TO SITE FOR RCWD INSPECTIONS 6 ROTOTILL COMPOST INTO TOPSOIL TO A MIN \{/ �i 1 INCH'= 10 FEET i ENTRANCE DETAIL DEPTH OF 8" BY USING A PRIMARY TILLING OPERATION SUCH AS A CHISEL PLOW, RIPPER OR SUBSOILER GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN (111=201) MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION EDGE OF DELINEATED I \ \O9s� \ \ WETLAND AS LOCATED �o r 1Ak ON JUNE 23, 2020. r 886 1 91578 EWET1-9 / KMON-PTl OCS 1 (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C3 2) W 885.9 EWETI 1886.2 EWETl- / -4 RE 890.25 \ /10' PARKING SETBAQK E 889.00 - RECT. ORIFICE ^c-_�e \ 888.75 - 12" CULVERT - NW A,, \ ' PGA tJ� j \ 041 30' BUI G SBLD _ / 12" RCP APRON \\ m \\� \\ \ \ \ O �O �`1 IE 888 00 i \\ \ r O A , 10 W/ 5 CY. CL III �'�' ��o ` ��, A A �/ O RIP RAP W/ FABRIC Y suet/ v\\� VVaV °s �� O o \ 2 a �`�� \\ �-,vim �\� \ 6, '888.9 \ SB#5 \�� i' '/ — \ \sue\ \ \ \ 1 / 0�5T CO 13'-12" RCP '890.8 TSB#4 \ ��` - 0 \ \ \ r sC V BSaI M0.7 F� \ \ \ \ 8 0 9 — .92 R\/W-MO N I ON-PT15 r \ C,A 10 X 891.8 �P * SB#2 10' PARKIN SETBACK \ \ �s PROPOSED BUILDING _ v 2,873 S.F. /—PROPOSED DRAINAGE o V A tiFFE 892.70 AND UTILITY EASE\ �\ NT— VA \ 11-6" PVC SAN. 888.0 \,% \ `r'�s \ SEWER@2.0oo \\ O `I r— t � 'yG ` i Y SETIP41578 892.1 SETIP41578 \ \ a G 891.3 � s\ Bysso SB#1 \ CO 2 RE 892.00 \ v v IE 884.00 -2 . j0 \ I � Know what's below. Call before you dig. \ 2c *EXTEND W F;�\ 10 \ r6s SAIT �01 43,421 S. F. SERVmv. 00 ACRES ILDING AT LOCATION DETERMINED X�. BY OWNER PIN No. 30-31-22-24-0088 Owner: City of Lino Lakes Address: Unassigned 8 X\ DLO f 8 -22-24-0021 i and Cynthia Barron . Blue Heron Drive EXISTING HOUSE RAIN GUARDIAN (TURRET) AT GUTTER ELEVATION OF 890.40 q FOR PRETREATMENT °c 100'-6" PVC SAN. SEWER @2.0% i \ I, co 1 RE 891.00 882.00 -NW fl IE 879.10f -SE ��AF2�G N C "' $ �O � 35-6" PVC SA r SEWER 0� 889.2 e`' e i o� ti /y o � CONNECT TO EXISTING Q 6'a WAT. STUB ' d W/ 6'a GATE VALE* 7 / \ r b�. \ 0 � Esc /110 9 �e GP g EX. MH* RE 889.67 IE 877.40f 10, CONNECT TO EXISTING SAN STUB AND EXTEND TO CO 1 AT EXISTING PIPE SLOPE. ADJUST BOTTOM ELEVATION OF CO 1 AS NEEDED * WATER MAIN NOTES EXISTING WATER SERVICE LOCATION AND SIZE SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. PROPOSED WATER SERVICE TO BE PVC C-900. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 8-FT COVER TO TOP OF ALL WATER SERVICE PIPE. SANITARY SEWER NOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. STORM SEWER NOTES FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. WHEN CALLED OUT AS PIPE, STORM SEWER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) ANSI C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS OR, IF ALLOWED BY CITY, HDPE PIPE MAY BE USED. (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED.) HDPE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M294, TYPE S WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. USE SAND/GRANULAR MATERIAL FOR BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION OF HDPE/PVC PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM 2321. STORM SEWER LENGTHS INCLUDE THE LAYING LENGTH OF THE FLARED -END SECTION. LAYING LENGTH OF APRON TO BE DEDUCTED FROM PAYMENT LENGTH OF PIPE. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. STORM SEWER PIPES TO BE JOINED TO THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES W/ APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE THEM GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE PERMITTED ONLY FOR REPAIRS AND CONNECTIONS OF EXISTING LINES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUCH JOINTS. DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: M.Q.A. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: PROD. NO. M.Q.A. 21-1998 ORIGINAL DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2021 z O a U W 0 z O U) W W H Q 0 N Ems 1` N � E } L c -0-00 O Q L O cl) z Ins U 5)c m •2 W OJ J ch Q Q O � a)W co U Q N U J LLI L O — Q 0 O CD W a z y z Q W_ a_ W c0 W 0 CD cm Z PREPARED FOR: MTO PROPERTIES SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 I, NORTH i 0 10 20 1 INCH = 20 FEET UTILITY PLAN MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION \ \ w \ - \ \ Landscape Materials Le end: p DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: H.L. H.L. \ \ CHECKD BY: PROJ. NO. B.H. 21-175 Proposed Turf Sod Native Seed Area - See Civil Plans \ . — .. — .. — — w � Landscape Requirements: / 41�� ,� (a) Foundation Landscape: 2 Large Trees + 6 Large Shrubs per 100 If of Building: o Q� : ` :=.'r. 2631f Building = 3 Trees and 18 Shrubs (b) Open Areas Landscape: a w 1 Large Tree + 3 Large Shrubs 2,000 Open Area: NATIVE GRASS SEEDING per sf of 27,250sf = 14 Trees and 42 Shrubs in o / V PER CIVIL PLANS GRADING PER CIVIL PLANS �;� c Basic Use Area Trees To Be Removed: 34 BUA Mitigation Trees Required: 0 (Non -ESA) w 01 �� , , �� , , �� , , .::. r:-w .:.::_ \ (d) Non -Basic Use Area Trees To Be Removed:10 TURF SOD FROM BACK OF \ Non BUA Mitigation Trees Required: 20 (Non -ESA) Q CURB TO PROPERTY LINE. (e) Existing Trees As Credit: 12 0 : SEED/SOD LINE \ (f) Required Bufferyards: Between Parking Lot and Public ROW - 30" Hgt. Between Parking Lot and Single Family - 72" Hgt. Tree Canopy Coverage Calculations: .,� 6,000 X 40 /o = 2,400sf required Gross Trees Owed: 37 / _ / Less Existing Tree Credit: 12 g 3 O :. i LANDSCAPE EDGER AND r WOOD MULCH PER NOTES New Trees Required: 25 New Large e Trees: 8 .... ....:. PATIO = ; New Medium Trees: 15 New Small Trees: 2 W 3 _ / \ \ O Total Coverage Provided: 3 700sf � • ::': ':.; -.`: -`:�:.:':;._ T�JRF:�O ACCENT BOULDER TYP 2 \ _ _ \ \ SEE LANDSCAPE NOTE. \ Landscape Requirements: \ \ EASEMENT LINE TYP. \ , 1 .See Civil Engineer's plans for grading layout and requirements. 9 p 9 9 Y q - �':�: .: <::. .:.:...........:: _ �:.�::'::.• 2. Contractor to coordinate all work In the city right-of-way with NATIVE GRASS SEEDING City of Lino Lakes Public Works Department. PROPOSED BUILDING PER CIVIL PLANS \ 3. Sod all disturbed areas except lant beds and mulch beds. p :. :......::... . ^fir SEED/SOD LINE 4. Install tree mulch ring on new trees planted in turf and seeded areas. r...::.. - .:..::...- ..�;, 5. Refer to Sheet L1.2 for Plant Schedules Notes and Details. NATIVE GRASS SEEDING RIPRAP PER CIVIL PLANS 6. All existing utilities must be field verified and located. o PER CIVIL PLANS ° ° ' / EXISTING TREES, TYP.ca `.`: Z E ENTRY SEED/SOD LINE -::. .. r 3' BUFFER ROW ,� \ o CoCA z 'r LU a / MONUMENT SIGN. SEE ° LU LU HVAC UNITS :.:. :::::. ..,........ ... .. BY OTHERS / / :...... _....:....., .. ;:....:. :: ' :' ;:: :° ARCHITECTURAL PLANS i _ W LU FL Ld :. LANDSCAPE EDGER AND o J PAVING PER =' WOOD MULCH PER :.. -.NMI CIVIL PLANS -( SIDEWALK PER NOTES ca CIVIL PLANS TRANSFORMER TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE —' �: ARCHITECTURAL PLANS �� / _ � 2' ROCK STRIP FOR PREPARED FOR: J_ / VEHICLE OVER-HANG.:sD: � = �; \ ZIA \ THRIVENT FINANCIAL TURF SOD FROM BACK OF \ SITE PLANNING CURB TO PROPERTY LINE. 000, & ENGINEERING EXISTING VEGETATION � PLOWE TO REMAIN. 6' BUFFER ROW, SEE ELEVATION v �-EX. % V �.::_':��..:v:.. / A \ ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE � � / , \ SUITE 110 LIGHT POLE PER ELECTRICAL ��,:. / "�! :: / \ \ �� u �, U TALL EVERGREEN BUFFER, DOUBLE ROW l � PARKED VEHICLE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \J / \ G U PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 A,a. / \ VIEW FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY e e \ EXISTING HOUSE ti° w / `` cdg / LANDSCAPE PER PLAN PARKING LOT PER CIVIL PLANS / CALYX DESIGN 1 PARKING LOT SCREENING STRATEGY - CROSS SECTION GROUP \ / ' NOT TO SCALE Landscape Architecture Sustainable Design \ \ / \ ` / EXISTING TREES, TYP. / Planning 475 Cleveland Avenue N. Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 N telephone: 8.9018 Internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com www.calyxdesigngroup.com \ , / LANDSCAPE PLAN s�ALF_: i" = 20'-0" NORTH � Landscape Notes &Requirements: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: WIDTHS MAY VARY PLANT SG�-IEDULE H.L. H.L. V-6" (MIN.) 1. Tree saucer for individual trees outside of a plant bed to be four inches (4") depth natural single -shred hardwood mulch. Install per tree planting detail. Do not place mulch against tree SEE PLANS CHECKD BY: PROJ. NO. trunk. Remove wire and burlap from top third of root ball before final soil back -fill and mulch. FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB. EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY B.H. 21-175 j MULCH PER LANDSCAPE NOTES 2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities &erosion control. 1/8" PROFESSIONAL BLACK STEEL EDGER WITH STAKES EVERY 18" (MIN). RYERSON Pd Picea glauca ' Densata' Black Hills Spruce 6' Hgt. B&B 1 3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs OR EQUAL. shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. _ _ o • III -III _ _ -III - FINISHED GRADE 0 0�... 1=III=III=III=11I II1=_-_ � 0 Tt Thu a occidentalis Techn ' 1 y Techn Arborvitae y 6' H t g B&B 29 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. _lII-III-II1=III-I III -I MI MI III- I= I=III=III=III-I - 1 I _ 3 OZ. NEEDLE -PUNCH FILTER FABRIC, TURN -UP 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. I I I=1 I I -I I I -III -I I 111= M I M � AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4". I I=I I I =I I II I II I II I II I I PITCH SUB -GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY OVERSTORY TREE CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city 1 p p p Y 1 q p pp g g Y q Y I II I II I II I II III=III=III-'' FROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS. review and approval. NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION. PLANT BED WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN. Art Acer rubrum 'Red Rocket' Red Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B 1 Z 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant SUBMIT MULCH, EDGER, AND FABRIC SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL. deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. 1 TYP MULCH DETAIL a . Br Betula nigra River Birch 6' Hgt. B&B 1 8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified. L1.2 NOT TO SCALE r U O7 9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. Co Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 2.5" Cal. B&B 2 W 0 10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant I ( O U) establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during NOTES: Ov2 Ostrya virginiana Ironwood 2.5" Cal. B&B 1 W plant installation shall be brought to the attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. STAKE TREES ON SLOPES OF4:1 OR GREATER W PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO -DOMINANT USING METHOD NOTED IN DETAIL 4. 11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and Compaction Conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL Te Tilia cordata 'Erecta' Littleleaf Linden 2.5" Cal. B&B 1 LU BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF 12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time of owner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to owner THE CROWN.FIELD Q acceptance shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance program including, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest STAKE TREES FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHTE T THEAPPROVALOFTHE Q Control. INSTALL 6" WHITE DRAIN TILE TRUNK GUARD ORNAMENTALTREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY 13. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 20% die -back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the warranty period. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, Y,ANDROAT THE TA rE,TREN EETOVER sIBLE. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT Ct Crataegus x mordenensis 'Toba' Toba Hawthorn 1.5" Cal. B&B 3 BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT 14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO MULCH RING 6FT. VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. DIAM.MIN. SFT.DIAM. MS2 Malus x 'Pink Spires' p Pink Spires Crab Apple p pp 1.5" Cal. B&B 2 GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY PREFERRED 15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. DRAINING SOILS. 16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. �T I_ WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN -ram . I _-'41N.HIGHEARTHSAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF - ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY 17. Irrigation: The landscape contractor shall furnish an Irrigation Layout Plan for head -to -head coverage of all tree, turf and shrub planting areas. Use commercial -grade irrigation 9 p g Y g p g � g �( _ CONTACT HWEEDFREEFWITH TREE K. FOR THE MULCH WEED -FREE FOR AFTER L -I _ - REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP f LII1 FROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL. ' Am Aronia melanocar a Morton TM I� Iro uis Beauty Black Chokeber GI Y rY 5 al. g Pot 3 sq* equipment and provide product cut -sheets and (4) copies of the proposed layout plan to the landscape architect for review and approval prior to installation. Coordinate irrigation PLANTING. _ IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, connection point, controller, back -flow and valving locations with the mechanical engineer, architect, & general contractor. Include 1 fall shut -down and spring start-up in irrigation bid. Sch 80 PVC sleeves necessary under areas to be coordinated between the landscape contractor, irrigation contractor, excavator, contractor, and General Contractor. NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL (EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL) PER CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTO PLANTING HOLE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. 0 Ca Cornus alba ' Regnzam' Red Gnome Dogwood 3 gal. Pot 12 ` paved paving NOTES. ENSURE TREE PIT PASSES REQUIRED PERCOLATION TESTING. 18. All edger shall be professional grade black steel edger, 1/8" thickness. Anchor every 18" on -center (minimum). Submit sample. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. DI Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 3 gal. Pot 16 19. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off -site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING -SECTION 44*: L1.2 NOT TO SCALE 0 HI Hydrangea paniculata 'Little Quick Fire' Little Quick Fire Hydrangea 3 gal. Pot 6 20. Mulch: Unless otherwise noted/indicated, plant beds shall receive local Western Red Cedar mulch over fabric weed mat, per detail. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. Do not install weed mat under perennials, with the exception of ornamental grasses. Where noted, rock mulch at parking lot beds shall be 4" buff limestone over 5oz. free -draining geotextile fabric. 0 if Juniperus chinensis'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper 5 gal. Pot 23 21. All planting, seeding, and sodded areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with a harley power box rake or equal to provide a firm planting bed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc. ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN Cc Juniperus sabina'Monna' Calgary Carpet Juniper 3 gal. Pot 12 22. Turf Soddingand Seeding activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2014 edition, for turf bed preparation, installation, g Y g g p p WIDTH ALLEXTENDAMINIMUMOF6 ONDTHELE EXCAVATIONPLANTS INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. INCHES BEYOND maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. Turf Seed installation to include TWO years of maintenance in the bid price. This includes mowing, weeding, & spot -spraying invasive weeds no 'Anthony less than 3 times per year. Maintenance also includes re -seeding bare patches larger than 6" in any direction, and fertilization no less than twice per calendar year. An acceptable stand Sa Spiraea x bumalda Waterer' Anthony Waterer Spiraea 2 gal. Pot 18 = of seeded turf is lush, full, and weed -free. PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES. O 3" DEPTH WATERING BASIN 23. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. MULCH PER NOTES Vb Viburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact' Compact American Cranberry Bush 5 gal. (Min. 18" Height) Pot 4 C J FINISHED GRADE W 24. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. Q / ` ` PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED ANNUALS/PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY Z = LLI 0 25. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. p p gg g Y PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE WIDTH. W O Hh Hemerocallis x 'Happy Returns' Happy Returns Daylily 1 gal. Pot 71 C LLl II 26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This y Q includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. `y U 3 TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING - SECTION C, 27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate with the general contractors on L1 2 GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc. NOT TO SCALE M 'El C Z Q Ce Calamagrostis x acutiflora Dorado' El Dorado Reed Grass 2 gal. Pot 20 J 28. See Site and Civil plans for additional information regarding the project, including infiltration area soils and sub -surface drainage requirements and performance. NMI 29. Topsoil Requirements: All graded areas of the site that are designated on the plan set for turf sod shall have no less than 6" of imported top soil, areas designated for shrubs, trees, O Cx2 Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Feather Reed Grass 1 gal. Pot 40 and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MnDOT classifications for planting soil for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building. 30. Percolation Testing: Landscape contractor must prove the open sub -grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/4-inch of NOTE: water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED holes augured every 36" on -center and filled with MnDOT Free -Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re -test sub -grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN PREPARED FOR: 31. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock CONTACT WITH TRUNK. ~o PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASAL traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, & FLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDINGLL TH RIVENT thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. 00 GRADE. Lu IS BLE FINANCIAL ENSURINGR HACTOR E TREES ARE ION AIPLUMBR 32. Accent Boulders: Where noted on the layout plan, the landscape contractor shall furnish and install a 48"X36"X30" tall Niagra Limestone boulder with flat -form character top and o < POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY bottom. Install boulder over a 4" sand setting bed, adjust plants and mulch around boulder. Typical of (2) boulders where shown. Field verify final location in the field with Owner prior to o w PERIOD. installation. W LL o <- ROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SITE PLANNING &ENGINEERING � SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAP W m FROM TOP 1 /3 OF ROOT BALL 2 0 c� MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE SPEC PLOWE wa w 00 / PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL ENGINEERING, INC. 8 SOD 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 nXn :.. ,, ,. i-'� LINO LAKES, MN 55014 SUBGRADE PHONE: (651) 361-8210 TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES. MINIMUM (2) PER TREE. FAX: (651) 361-8701 _ 11 - DRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY 111-11 I11-11 11 11-11- 1 1I 7 r FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS. 4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER TWICE BALL DIAMETER Ilk W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC. 4 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION cdg CALYX DESIGN L1.2 NOT TO SCALE GROUP Landscape Architecture Sustainable Design Planning 475 Cleveland Avenue N. Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 telephone: 651.788.9018 internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES AND SCHEDULES ■ KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That MTO Properties LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, RICE LAKE ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. Also dedicating to the County of Anoka the right of access onto County State Aid Highway No. 49 as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said MTO Properties LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 MTO PROPERTIES LLC Benjamin D. 011ila, as STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of MTO Properties LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota (Signature) (Print Name) 20 by Benjamin D. 011ila, as I Jason E. Rud do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Jason E. Rud, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 41578 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota (Signature) (Print Name) 20 by Jason E. Rud. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota By Mayor By Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION -- 64.15 -- N89*02'50 "E 103.34 92.38 At, � 'vvM1, ro / I I O I O 0 I w O � I - 0 I II I David M. Zieglmeier Anoka County Surveyor 20 COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of , 20 Property Tax Administrator By , Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of MTO PROPERTIES ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock M. and was duly recorded as Document Number 0 County Recorder/Registrar of Titles I\ O \ A� Off, °S . 0 \ \% / ' 20 It" 0017 / —114 / L---------_ LOT 1 \ \ \ BLOCK A \y"=;� 54.65 N86012'22 "W \ \\ \\ \ rsssr �Q / 0 \ / �O jy \ N, -FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON \\\ \ PIPE MARKED RLS 14942 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTYOFANOKA SEC. 30, T31NP B22W 1° SEE NORTH DETAIL 0 10 20 40 80 •O \ / v• OC `r0 ( SCALE IN FEET) 1 inch = 20 feet LEGEND ! - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: DENOTES FOUND ANOKA COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENT l0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND, 10 I 10 / -, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET, MARKED RLS NO. 41578 DENOTES WETLAND EDGE AS DELINEATED BY JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC IN JUNE 2020. DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OUTLOT A, RICE LAKE ESTATES IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 44 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 23 SECOND WEST. 0 N1. BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES, SIDE AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS s0 OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. / � E. G. Run & SONS. INC. E"-;9nU Professional Land Surveyors By Deputy PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR P & Z MEETING DATE Katie Larsen, City Planner Jessica Eller, Community Development Intern December 8, 2021 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit for Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes at 7910 Lake Drive CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: CU2021-003 SP2021-002 Brian Lubben 4501 Hunters Ridge Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 OWNER: Paul Selbitschka 5550 Lilac Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: November 8, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: January 7, 2022 120-Day Review Deadline: March 8, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: November 30, 2021 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 8, 2021 Tentative City Council Work Session: January 3, 2022 Tentative City Council Meeting: January 10, 2022 BACKGROUND Precision Tune Auto Care (PTAC) is currently located at 550 Lilac Street. The applicant is proposing to relocate their existing business and construct a new 4,125 sf facility on a 0.7 acre parcel located at 7910 Lake Drive. The Land Use Application is for the following: 1 oo Conditional Use Permit o Automobile and truck repair oo Site and Building Plan Review This staff report is based on the followings plan sets: oo Civil Plan Set prepared by Lake and Land Surveying, Inc. dated November 2, 2021 oo Architectural Plan Set prepared by Building Foundry dated November 8, 2021 oo Landscape Plan Set prepared by Calyx Design Group dated November 8, 2021 oo Photometric Plan prepared by Building Foundry dated October 8, 2021 oo Drainage Calculations prepared by Lake and Land Surveying, Inc. dated November 2, 2021 oo Subsurface Geotechnical Assessment prepared by MTM Environmental, Inc. dated October 1, 2021 ANALYSIS Background Per the applicant's narrative, the proposed plan involves construction of a one-story, 4,125 square foot building that will replace the existing automotive care facility at 550 Lilac Street. The building will include 6 auto service bays, reception area, waiting area, employee break room, office, and restrooms. The site will also have a parking lot with 25 stalls with 1 of them being ADA compliant. Existing Site Conditions The existing site is approximately 0.7 acres. Tree species present on the site today include Siberian elms, quaking aspen, cottonwood, green ash, and spotted knapweed. The site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 813.5 to 816.5 ft. Per the Geotechnical Exploration Report, soils are Soderville fine sand, hydrologic group A. Groundwater was encountered while drilling soil borings to depths of 12.5 feet. Zoning and Land Use The property is zoned GB, General Business and allows for automobile and truck repair with a conditional use permit. Current Zoning GB, General Business Current Land Use Vacant Commercial Future Land Use per CP Commercial Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North GB, General Vacant Commercial Commercial Business GB, General East Business & R- Vacant Commercial & Commercial & Low X, Rural Single Family Residential Density Residential Executive South GB, General Commercial Commercial Business R-1, Single Low Density West Family Vacant Rural Residential Residential Residential Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The site plan proposes a one story 4,125 sf building. The development will be constructed in 1 phase. The surface water from the proposed building and parking lot will flow to several proposed infiltration basins along the west, north, and east sides of the property and to a drainage pond on the south side of the site. A 25 stall parking lot will be developed as part of the project. A Site Plan Review Worksheet detailing setbacks and performance standards has been completed. Overall, the proposed building and parking lot meet setback and performance standard requirements. Lot Size & Setbacks GB Requirements ::�P�TAC Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 30,480 sf Min. Lot Width -Interior Lot 100 ft 142 ft -Corner Lot NA NA Building Setback -From Streets --Local Street NA NA --Collector or Arterial 40 ft 81.5 ft --Parking Lot 15 ft 15 ft Rear --Principal' 35 ft 45 ft --Accessory 5 ft 16 ft --Parking Lot loft loft -Side (north) --Principal loft 44 ft --Accessory loft 15 ft -Side (south) --Principal loft 41 ft --Accessory loft 120 ft 'Per the GB, General Business District, commercial building setback from residential properties is 35 ft. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials Per the architectural plan set prepared by Building Foundry dated November 8, 2021, the exterior materials of the building include split face concrete block, steel garage doors, glass doors and windows, and painted red concrete block. The applicant shall provide the percentage of building facade with contrasting colors. The building does not have a well- defined base, middle and top. The zoning ordinance requirements are not met. The building floor plan is 4,125 sf and consists of six (6) auto service bays, reception area, waiting area, employee break room, office and toilet rooms. The building height is 18' 0" to the peak of the roof which is less than the maximum allowed 45 feet. A trash enclosure is proposed to serve the new building. Construction details indicate light beige split face concrete block to match the proposed building. The gate is painted treated wood. The enclosure is 6 feet in height. The trash enclosure meets performance standards. Mechanical equipment is located on the rooftop. No screening details were provided. The rooftop mechanical will need to be fully screened. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. 4 Outdoor Lighting A photometric plan was submitted showing foot candle compliance at the property lines. Light fixtures on the building are down lit. Off -Street Parking Requirements Per City Code Section 1007.044(6), auto repair requires 2 spaces per serving bay; the service bay is not a parking space. The PTAC is proposing 6 service bays and would require 12 parking stalls. The site plan provides 25 parking stalls with 1 of them being ADA compliant. Parking requirements are met. Staff notes that if there is a need for reduced hardcover or more landscaping, some of the extra parking stalls could be eliminated. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per City Engineer Memo dated December 1, 2021, the stormwater on the site flows to the south to a stormwater facility on the adjacent property and eventually flows to a City of Lino Lakes pond located in Lino Park. The surface water from the proposed building and parking lot will flow to several proposed infiltration basins along the west, north, and east sides of the property and to a drainage pond on the south side of the site. Rain guardian turrets are proposed to direct runoff to the infiltration basins and the drainage pond. The infiltration basins are designed to provide water quality treatment and rate control. A Stormwater Management Plan must be provided in accordance with City Ordinance. Public Utilities The proposed building will be municipally served by a 12" DIP watermain and a 21" PVC sanitary sewer located along CSAH 23 (Lake Drive). Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The Environmental Coordinator and Environmental Board reviewed the tree preservation and landscaping plans. Per the November 30, 2021 Environmental Board staff report: The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The grading and erosion control notes mention protecting trees to the dripline. Any trees to be preserved must be protected in accordance with the city tree protection fence details. Tree inventory and tree preservation and mitigation plan must be provided. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. of open area. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs There is 6,150 sq. ft. of open space that requires 3 large trees and 9 large shrubs. 6 large trees or large tree equivalents and 18 large shrub equivalents have been provided. Open areas landscape standards have been met. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require at the minimum a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. Buffers will be required for the southeast corner of the parcel to screen the residential use, and the west perimeter to screen the parking lot from the right of way and Lake Drive. Existing trees in the easement will provide a buffer for the southeast corner. A 30-inch buffer and/or screen is required to screen the parking lot from the right of way. A continuous 4-5' screen has been provided, but it is not a triangulated, double row. Buffers and screen standards have not been met. Canopy Cover The purpose of this requirement is to mitigate the effects of vehicular hardscape by establishing tree canopy cover to intercept rainfall, protect pavement from sun deterioration, reduce the heat island effect, and improve aesthetics. Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Vehicular hardscape planned: 13,350 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 5,340 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 3,750 sq. ft. 6 Large trees within 7' of hardscape = 5 trees @ 600 sq. ft. each = 3,000 sq. ft. Medium tree within 7' of hardscape = 1 tree @ 250 sq. ft. = 250 sq. ft. Medium tree with hardscape on 3 sides = 1 tree @ 500 sq. ft. = 500 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. Per ordinance, 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs For 55 linear feet of applicable foundation (the building front), 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs (or acceptable substitutes) are required. The plans indicate 1 large tree within 30 feet of the building, but it is not on the applicable side. The foundation landscape requirements have not been met. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The Landscape Plan indicates an approximately 3-foot strip of sod around the entire parking lot and right-of-way area abutting Lake Drive. The C7 details page indicates MnDOT 25-131 will be used. This should be clarified. The stormwater management areas will be seeded with Mn DOT 33-261, a mix of native grasses and forbs for use around stormwater ponds. The C7 details page indicates MnDOT 33-262 will be used. This should also be clarified. All areas with trees, shrubs, and turf will be irrigated. Signage A Sign Permit Application and sign plans shall be submitted for any wall or ground mount signage. Impervious Surface Coverage The GB, General Business zoning district allows for 75% impervious surface coverage. The proposed impervious surface is 19,615 sq. ft. or 65% which meets ordinance requirements. Impervious Surface Coverage Total Parcel Size 30,480 sf Proposed Impervious 19,615 sf (65%) Traffic Study A traffic study is not required. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an A -Minor Reliever Road and is capable of handling the additional traffic volume proposed by the development. Public Land Dedication Park land dedication and/or fees are not required. This is an existing lot of record and not being subdivided. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is not within the AUAR environmental review boundary. Wetlands There are no wetlands located on site. Shoreland District The parcel is not located within the Shoreland District. Floodplain There are no floodplains located on site. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP's such as curb, gutter and infiltration basins. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The proposed PTAC development is consistent with commercial land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the proposed PTAC development. A 6 feet high fence or landscape screen 40 ft in length will be required adjacent to the residential development to the southeast. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an A -Minor Reliever Road and is capable of handling the additional traffic volume proposed by the PTAC development. Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan A 12" DIP watermain and 21" PVC sanitary sewer main along CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) provide public utilities to the site and building. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Anoka County Highway Department The Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the proposed development. They commented that the turn lane should be extended by approximately 90 feet. Public Safety Comments The Fire and Police Divisions reviewed the plans and had no issues that needed to be addressed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the project on November 30, 2021 and recommended approval with conditions. Those conditions are summarized in the attached Environmental Memo dated December 1, 2021. Storm Water Maintenance Agreement The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required. Findings of Fact -Conditional Use Permit The property is zoned GB, General Business and allows for automobile and truck repair with a conditional use permit. The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: 1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: a. Land Use Plan. b. Transportation Plan. c. Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans. d. Local Water Management Plan. e. Capital Improvement Plan. f. Policy Plan. g. Natural Environment Plan. The proposed PTA development is consistent with the Land Use, Utility, Local Water Management, Capital Improvement, Policy and Natural Environmental Plans and recommendations of the comprehensive plan as detailed in this staff report. 2. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed PTA development is compatible with present and future land uses. The subject site and adjacent parcels to the north, south and east are guided and zoned for commercial use. The parcels to the east and west are guided for low density residential. The commercial building is setback 75 ft from the property line and includes a fence or landscape screen. The proposed PTAC development is consistent with the commercial land uses. 10 3. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. A Site Plan Review has been completed and the proposed PTA development meets zoning performance standards with conditions listed in staff report. 4. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: a. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. b. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. 11 The proposed PTA development does not change the level of service on CSAH 23 (Lake Drive). The road is an A -Minor Reliever Road and is capable of handling the additional traffic volume proposed by the project. 5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. The proposed PTA development will connect to an adequate and safe municipal water supply. 6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. The proposed PTA development will be served by an adequate and safe municipal sanitary sewer system. 7. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. No City funds are being expended on this project. 8. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Automobile and truck repair are an allowed use within the GB, General Business District with an approved conditional use permit. The project will not generate excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 9. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. There are no natural, scenic or historic features on the existing site. Specific Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Requirements In addition to the administrative requirements of a conditional use permit, the following specific performance standards of Section 1007.112 (8) (a) must also be met: 1. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. The proposed building will be consistent with the surrounding buildings. 12 2. The entire area other than occupied by buildings or structures or planting shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete which will control dust and drainage. The entire area shall have a perimeter curb barrier, a storm water drainage system and is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The PTAC development will be surfaced with bituminous material, and the entire area will have a perimeter curb barrier. The City Engineer has reviewed the storm water drainage system and notes that some revisions will be required. 3. All buildings shall provide an interior location for trash handling or an enclosed trash receptacle area in conformance with the following: a. Exterior wall treatment shall be similar and/or complement the principal building. b. The enclosed trash receptacle area shall be located in the rear or in a side yard which is not abutting a street. c. The trash enclosure must be in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. d. The trash enclosure must be fully screened from view of adjacent properties. The PTAC development plans indicate a fully enclosed trash receptacle area at the rear of the property that will be of similar color and material to the main building. 4. All painting must be conducted in an approved paint booth. All paint booths and all other activities of the operation shall thoroughly control the emission of fumes, dust or other particulated matter so that the use shall be in compliance with the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1-15, as amended. The PTAC development shall meet these requirements. 5. The emission of odor by a use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota regulations APC, as amended. The project will not generate excessive smoke, fumes or odors. 6. All flammable materials, including liquids and rags, shall conform with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. The PTAC development shall meet these requirements. 13 7. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. No outside storage is proposed with this project. 8. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served by modifying the conditions. The PTAC development shall meet these requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and site plan review for Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes subject to the following conditions: 1. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. 2. A separate public drainage and utility easement and exhibit shall be recorded over the stormwater management facilities and lot lines. 3. A Site Performance Agreement and securities are required. 4. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. 5. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon and wall signage. 6. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage. 7. A six (6) feet high fence or landscape screen 40ft in length will be required adjacent to the residential development to the southeast. The following items shall be addressed prior issuance of a building permit: 1. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated December 1, 2021 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated December 1, 2021 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from Anoka County Highway Department shall be addressed. 4. A RCWD permit is required. 5. The applicant shall draft a separate public drainage and utility easement and exhibit for the stormwater management facilities and lot lines. 6. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall be approved by City Council and executed. 7. The applicant shall draft a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities for the private stormwater maintenance facility. 8. Architectural plans shall be revised to include a well-defined base, middle and top. 14 9. The applicant shall provide the percentage of building facade with contrasting colors. 10. Roof mounted mechanical equipment will need to be fully screened. The applicant shall provide screening details. 11. Proposed parking stalls at zero (0) degrees need to be revised to meet parking area standards. 12. All applicable plan sheets: a. Trash enclosure size shall match garbage enclosure detail. 13. Sheet C3, Site Plan: a. The required setbacks shall be listed. b. Parking requirements and calculations shall be listed. c. Impervious surface percentage shall be shown. d. A six (6) foot high fence or landscape screen 40ft in length will be required adjacent to the residential development to the southeast. 14. Sheet L1.1, Landscape Plan: b. Legend shall be revised so that the proposed turf sod and sidewalk are more distinguishable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. Narrative 3. City Engineer letter dated December 1, 2021 4. Environmental Coordinator letter dated December 1, 2021 5. Civil Plan Set prepared by Lake and Land Surveying Inc. dated November 2, 2021 6. Architectural Plan Set prepared by Building Foundry dated November 8, 2021 7. Landscape Plan Set prepared by Calyx Design Group dated November 8, 2021 15 Site Location & Aerial Map N 0 100 200 400 C T. Y O F V✓*s- IE Feet LNOL KES 7910 Lake Dr -Precision Tune Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes, Minnesota Written Narrative 8 November 2021 Introduction O Paul Selbitschka of Lino Lakes proposes to build a new Precision Tune Auto Care facility in Lino Lakes to replace his existing location, also in Lino Lakes Paul Selbitschka, ASE O Owner/Operator, Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes, 2004 to present O Master Certification, Automotive Service Excellence (ASE), 1998 O Automotive Technician, Saturn of St. Paul, 1993 to 1998 O Certification, Automotive Service Excellence (ASE), 1993 O Automotive Repair Degree, Century College, 1993 O Apprentice, Main Motors Chevrolet, 1991 to 1993 Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes O Existing site at 550 Lilac Street in Lino Lakes O 17 years at present location O 4.8 star rated, Google Reviews O Total of 70 years auto repair experience O Committed to community and customers New Property O 7910 Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota O Replaces existing location at 550 Lilac Street O Property, 30,480 square feet, 0.70 acres O Relatively flat site fenced on four sides O Stormwater retention features at perimeter of site O Concrete curbs and gutters with asphalt paving O Total 25 parking spaces including one accessible space O Garbage enclosure at rear of site O Building mounted LED cutoff wall pack site lighting O Lighted monument sign on Lake Drive Page 1 of 3 New Building O One story, 4,125 square feet building O Building includes reception area, waiting area, employee break room, office, and toilets O Building includes six auto service bays O Split face concrete block exterior walls O Beautiful and durable masonry finish inside and out O Building is fully sprinklered according to 2020 Minnesota State Building Code requirements O Meets stringent energy code requirements O Flat roof with membrane roofing and scuppers thru exterior wall O Aluminum entrance doors and windows in customer area O Insulated steel doors and overhead doors in shop area O Construction start in spring 2022 and completion in summer 2022 Outside Mechanical Equipment O All the building and auto service equipment used by the business will be located within the Mechanical/Electrical room and the Repair Area inside the building. O A low profile air handler unit, approximately 6 feet long, 4 feet wide, and 3 feet high, will be mounted on the roof of the building with its top approximately two feet above the roof parapet elevation. The air handler will be located approximately 20 feet from the west, north, and south parapet walls of the building. With this height and and location, the topmost point of the air handler is visible only at distances greater than 150 feet from the building for an average viewer eye height of five feet above finish floor. The top one foot of the air handler unit is only visible to viewers at a distance of approximately 300 feet from the building. This rooftop unit is cleanly constructed and creates little if any distraction to the building or surroundings. Garbage Enclosure O Plans and elevations for the garbage enclosure located at the northeast corner of the site have been provided. The materials and finishes for this structure match the new building. Oils and Fluids O Our project includes an oil / water separator to remove fuel and oil from water draining from floor of the Repair Area. This component will be serviced on an as needed basis. O Used oils such as motor oil, transmission fluid, and differential gear oil are collected in rolling floor drains (18 gallons each) and pumped into a 500 gallon waste oil tank. This waste oil is then collected and disposed of by EPA approved waste oil disposal companies. The Owner currently use East Side Oil Company for this purpose. In winter months, the Owner burns the waste oil to provide heat for the Repair Area. Page 2of3 O Used oil filters are collected and stored in a 55 gallon drum which is also exchanged by East Side Oil Company approximately every two months. O Used antifreeze is collected and stored in a 120 gallon tank to be collected approximately monthly by Heritage Crystal Clean who then recycles and resells it. O Used tires are picked up approximately every two months and disposed of by Liberty Tire Recycling. Tree Preservation O Tree inventory and tree preservation and mitigation plan will be provided at a later date. Page 3 of 3 2 0 0 0 z W co U) 0 a 00 04 N LO CD 0 0 N W Z) W W af F- U) M W 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Kelsey Gelhar, Project Engineer, WSB Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: December 1, 2021 Re: Precision Tune Auto Care Plan Review 019407-000 WSB has reviewed the proposed site plans for the Precision Tune Auto Care site located at 7910 Lake Drive (CSAH 23) in Lino Lakes, MN. Plans were prepared by Lake and Land Surveying, Inc., and were received on November 8, 2021. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and documents: DO Civil Plans (Sheets C1-C7) prepared by Lake and Land Surveying, Inc., dated October 11, 2021 00 Landscape Plans prepared by Calyx Design Group, dated November 8, 2021 00 Drainage Calculations prepared by Lake and Land Surveying, Inc., dated November 2, 2021 Engineering • Grading The Precision Tune plans include site grading for the proposed building, parking lot, and the stormwater basins. Comments: 1. Applicant to show existing contours 100-ft beyond the site. 2. Staff recommends Anoka County review the ditch grading in the Anoka County right-of-way. 3. Applicant to update ditch grading in the southwest corner of the site. It appears that the proposed 814 contour will trap water in the Anoka County right-of-way. 4. Applicant to review 815 contours on the east side of the site. They do not appear to tie into existing contours. 5. Applicant to fix tie in points for proposed contours. The grading plan currently shows cutting off an existing 816 contour on the north side of the site and an existing 814 contour on the east side of the site. 6. Staff recommends that the applicant lessens the grade at the driveway entrance. The slope in the curb on the south side of the entrance appears to be approximately 5.4%. • Stormwater Management Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 2 The stormwater on the site flows to the south to a stormwater facility on the adjacent property and eventually flows to a City of Lino Lakes pond located in Lino Park. The surface water from the proposed building and parking lot will flow to several proposed infiltration basins along the west, north, and east sides of the property and to a drainage pond on the south side of the site. Rain guardian turrets are proposed to direct runoff to the infiltration basins and the drainage pond. The infiltration basins are designed to provide water quality treatment and rate control. After the project is completed, the site will include new impervious surfaces including the parking lot and building. Based on the soil boring information, the groundwater elevation on the site is between 802.4 and 802.62. Soils consist of poorly graded sands and gravelly sands. The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer conveyance system and basin. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year rainfall events. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year Pre -Development 0.00 0.01 1.04 Post -Development 0.00 0.00 0.23 Post -development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre -development rates. Comments: 1. Staff recommends Anoka County review culvert extension in the Anoka County right-of-way. 2. Applicant to show emergency overflow elevations and locations for all facilities and shall adjust contours accordingly. 3. Applicant to submit a Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with City Ordinance 1011.011 (1). 4. Applicant to provide calculations showing the proposed BMP meets the water quality volume requirements in Table 2 of the City's stormwater ordinance. • Water Supply There is existing 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain located along Lake Drive (CSAH 23) adjacent to the site. The applicant is proposing a 1-inch copper water service to serve the proposed building. The water service will connect into an existing stub from Lake Drive (CSAH 23). Comments: Precision Tune Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 3 1. Applicant to verify if a 1-inch service is enough to serve the building and fire flow requirements. A hydrant flow test is recommended to provide pressure data to the architect or designer. • Sanitary Sewer There is an existing 21-inch diameter poly -vinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer located along Lake Drive (CSAH 23) adjacent to the site. The applicant is proposing a 4-inch diameter PVC sanitary service to serve the proposed building. The sanitary service will connect into an existing stub from Lake Drive (CSAH 23). Comments: 1. Applicant to submit list of effluent types and concentrations, other than typical bathroom waste, that will be sent to the city sanitary system (oils, solvents, grease, etc.). • Transportation This site is located at 7910 Lake Drive (CSAH 23). The existing entrance to the parking lot is located on Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and is situated within the right turn lane to Kelly Street. The proposed entrance is further to the south, but still within the right turn lane. The proposed entrance width is 25-ft from the back of curb to the back of curb. Lake Drive (CSAH 23) is a county state aid highway and can accommodate the traffic from this development. A specific Traffic Study was not completed for the proposed site. Comments: 1. Applicant to extend the turn lane as required by Anoka County (see email dated November 23, 2021 from Logan Keehr). • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no existing wetlands on Precision Tune site. • Landscaping The applicant is proposing to establish turf on the site with turf sod and native grass seeds. Comments: Native grass seed mixes shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes Native Plant Establishment Policy. This policy is included in Division 2 of the City of Lino Lakes Standard Specifications. • Floodplain There are no existing floodplains on the Precision Tune site. • Drainage and Utility Easements Precision Tune Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 4 The Lake Drive (CSAH 23) right-of-way is 100-ft wide adjacent to this property. There are no records of drainage and utility easements on the property. Comments: 1. A Drainage and Utility Easement shall be platted around the proposed infiltration basins and ponds. 00 Site Performance Agreement A Site Performance Agreement will be required. 00 Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer facilities. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Rice Creek Watershed Permit 4. Anoka County Right -of -Way Permit 5. Anoka County Access Permit If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. Precision Tune Engineering Review Ile CITY OF LQ� KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Environmental Memo Date: November 30t", 2021 Re: Environmental Board Comments/November 30th, 2021/Precision Tune The Environmental Board, at their November 30th meeting, had the following recommendations for Precision Tune: 1. Mulch used for stabilization shall be type 3 certified noxious weed free mulch. Minnesota Crop Improvement Association (MCIA) tags must be provided to the City. 2. A concrete washout area should be established on site and identified with a sign. 3. Tree preservation and mitigation plan must be provided to the city. For the 21 removals identified in the tree inventory, 16 mitigation trees must be planted. There are 6 trees credited towards open space standards, which will also apply to mitigation standards. 10 additional trees must be planted to meet mitigation standards. Alternatively, a mitigation fee can be paid for each of the 10 required trees. 4. Buffer and screen standards have not been met for the west perimeter, as a triangulated, double row of plants is required. Plants with a shorter mature height (2-3') should be used to form this buffer. 5. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. 6. Foundation landscape standards have not been met. 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs will be required for the west face of the building. 7. Autumn Blaze maples have poor structure and are prone to defects. Replace Autumn Blaze maple with another variety of maple or another species. 0 Page 1 8. The landscape details indicate MnDOT 33-261 will be used for the stormwater management areas, but MnDOT 33-262 is indicated on the C7 details page. This should be changed to match the landscape details page (33-261). 9. The landscape plan indicates sod will be used in all areas not planted with MnDOT 33-261, but the C7 details page indicates MnDOT 25-131, low maintenance turf seed. Clarify which of the two turf types will be used and ensure plans match. 10. Irrigation should only be needed for the areas with turf, trees, or shrubs. The stormwater seed mix areas should not require irrigation. • Page 2 $ 8`16.26 R ------I-- BENCH IONK8SA 26ARY MANHOLE COVER IIDN� T I F I C AT INVERT ELEVATION=799.16 8C 0 F SURV Y \ I N \ w a 1 U 1 A �'A , o w \ \ �\\ \ N ( \\ �. \--------------------------------------------------- ___ \ __ _ r\ I n 1 r- /� 1 r- n 1 L_ L- I V I V 6 Zi `\ i �\------'------------- -- 817.06 (N64°19 30 W DESCRIBED) M I / \\ ( \\ * 816.58 816.67----______________ ' » ____ 63`37 51 817.18 ,� + 816.64 I GO 1 815.89 I 816.52 ! ` ' " IRON PIPE \ 177.84 N63 37 51 W 1 \\ IRON PIPE i \` / - pH I 815.61 \ � \ 3/4 INCH e1s.s2 I `\ 9" ASH 6" ASH 816.46 \ 816.48 / I OFiW- \ RLS 18213 , � a,s.1a � r I T I T GUY WIRE 8161 COTTONWOOD I 1 816.27 8,s.49 815.98 + 816.15 14" POPLAR 12" POPLAR 7" ELM I I 815.88 `� 816.19 ---_ " 14" POPLAR l� 9" ELM- /--- N TW 18" ELM �- _ 816.25 14 POPLAR }----___ I \ Y� 14" POPLAR / TWIN 15" I 1813.ss 817.04 1 ' i \\ /,' �- 815.93 \\ �' & 6" ELM 815.68 COTTONWOOD I j 20" POPLAR I I l SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 10" ELM I + 815.46 \ 815.72 \ I I \ 11 -TELECOM PEDESTAL I 1 0 I 1 \ I I 0 I I I \\ � I I � 815.62 LLI 1 \ GRAPHIC SCALE LLJ [n I I O I Z I F S INV=814.54 I \ I I \ \ I \ I \\ I I \\ 10 0 5 10 20 40 O I I 81�Sk _j I I \\ I 9" POPLAR I \\ Co I 2 F- ls1ya C/ i I 815.62\\` IN FEET 815.37 I 1 1 inch = 10 ft. I N I \ 816.92 N 0 j / ``�\ 616.05 x 1 / i \\ I I--------- 816----- �� / O \ 1 816.42 --- j / 815.94 �- 814.10 \\\ - -- 816.26 i 815.95 \ I j f' I / � / 1-814.10 \\ I � 1\\ 815.88 I I F_\ I - I - / \ r \ J / / / I I r \ r \ I / 814.78 \`\ I\I I LJ LJ I V 1 1 N 1 V \/ I �/ �/ // 30" ELM \ \ 1 LO \I / 814.68 `\ % / � 814.09 I 60 Z N i X 815.32 815.16 �- 815.47 815.47 / GUY 814.40 \\ % I J 1 814.43 \ / Nvo a- I 6 \ / / 1 814.72Y I 0 H -----SANITARY SERVICE 4"PVC (RECORD DRAWINGS) / '� ENE 0 / 1 II ss INVERT 804.14f WITH 7 FT RISER (FIELD VERIFY) OF LSO��N I O \ I I = _W WATER SERVICE (RECORD DRAWINGS) \,�N ENE i� \ I I \ / 1 INCH COPPER NOR�N��\NG I c0 �815.03 I U I 2 I /�� 1 1 EL=815.12 �814.76 1 \ �s � � 1 1 `\ 814.74 z 10 1 i 1 \ / I 1 00 N O 814.95 11 \\ 814.00 / 1 U 0D / 11 815.13 \ \ 11 y- 813.71 ` 30" BOX `�\ D ELDER N a W 11 \ \ �\ PIPE I O c 1 \\ \ I CAPPED � I \ EL=814.90 I I 00 \ \ I X 814.90 ` \ ' �c 814.00 : w 1 � U , \ . \ I j (N _j 0 W X 815.32 \ \ \`� \`- ------- _ \\ Y �-------- --- -� --- SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 \\\ Q X o ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 \\\\8 +a13.so \\ 1 w _z I ' F--- i \ \------- \\ S I I _ os 1 / 815.02 \� \\ 4-813.87 816.93 j 8" ELM \\ \\ (� 20 y- 815.25 813.15 \\ 815.78 �js1.814.89 \\ 814.20 I � FES INV 813.90 I I --I-f� �815.75 Y-815.48 \\ X814.13 / 814.36 \ jLLJ I w l j I fn N \\ 11" POPLAR D I N � I I \ \ C7 / \\ 0; , I \ N � i \ \ \ 8" ELM / \\ F- I I \ \ / \ I \ / m i I I \ / \ \ / 813.57 1 1 ab \\ 815.32 r \ \ I� It 813.55 I \ \ \ \ 6" ASH ppsm / 817.15 j I \ 815.13 \ \ \ IRON PIPE I 1 I �815.53 _�-__ / 814.93 �815.16 �� 815.53 -- 815.32 \\� 3 4 INCH 913.49 Ej Li-_ �_ ----- 813.34815---- _ 814.97814.97 814.42 815.22 J 814.71 / _ 814.89 , -- -- 1 L E G E N D I 1 �RON PIPE -__ - ' ' I °� � 15"RCP INVERT---� TOP STRUCTURE ELEVATION=814.15 +Sta.53 ___-__814____-_____ / RLS 41578 ----------------------. -->-----------------------------+8,4.,z_---------------------- ----- EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 7------ ELEVATION=813.33 BOTTOM STRUCTURE ELEVATION=811.39 O DENOTES 12 INCH COMMON SPIKE SET WITH I --I*- ,, S63 48 04 E 250.49 ____-----12.47 ----------------___ \ �------ 8" ORIFICE INVERT ,,-'��---------------813------------- __-------------- + a1z.a7--'------------------------ - _ - I WASHER STAMPED RLS 16464 OR AS NOTED. I ------ STM els.oa ----- __--- 813.77 • STM ELEVATION-812.08 -----_---� 812.4s ----- ,,-' ---- 15"RCP - (t siz-so--------------------------------- _ ----- 812.73-------------- - siz.,a DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND I STM /------- --- _-- - �812.15 +a,z.24 SIZE, TYPE, & R.L.S. AS NOTED. I u0 ram.-----816,--`- 815.87 ha i --'---------'-----------------813----------___-- +e1z.3s ,,, __ --- \ ___ X xxx.xx DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION o I ------ ( �r- ----_b Al__--- --------�--__ + 812.46 ,--',----------------------- ---__- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - e12.15 \ I '\ I I ---- FES INVERT - - '` 1------ --- XXX ---- DENOTES EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR ---- ---------________ x'a,aza___ SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 7----------- � I I \`\ 1 c_� i ELEVATION=812.54---�-'�------------814----------------- _,'-'_ � - - -� ---�- \ � -c-DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE uoj O I I `\ STM I 1 --- ---_ -' _____ -- --- ,�a,3.,s ---_ __-_-_-- - w -DENOTES WATER MAIN OR SERVICE N w I i L ` _ _ _ J J _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ \--------------------------------- - - --------------- \ \ \ \ -'---------- \. J I -----8 ---- - - -ss-DENOTES SANITARY SEWER OR SERVICE _______ 5 0 \-_________________--- -------------__ __ ---- - J,�� ,, CONCRETE CURB - -sna-DENOTES STORM SEWER OR SERVICE `� > ` �� j 817.3397 1--------- -- - __ 0 DENOTES CHAIN -LINK FENCE � \\ �l+ a,7.39 a,7.2, ________ ------------------------- a,s.94------------------816-------------- 0 DENOTES WOOD FENCE \ 1 * r 5-0 CONCRETE CURB 816.57 ---------------------- �%� © DENOTES TELECOM PEDESTAL w M BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT 816.45 ------- .51 QT DENOTES TELECOM MANHOLE `\� ; m 816.58 0 \.°\ STORM SEWER MANHOLE COVER RIM=817.29 ---� INVERT=813.2t RECORD DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) OH W OH W M fn fn a- U a- U 00 F 817.29 a (N fn OD DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE �� \`\ ; � 1 U Legal Description: ( WtDeed) (Warranty ee S PP O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STM g DENOTES WATER VALVE i i w art of Lots 6 and 7, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 100, Anoka Count , That p y y g y gpv Minnesota, 11n Norther) of the following described line: Ca, DENOTES UTILITY POLE 13.07 I i v z Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of and 20 feet Northerly from the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence Northwesterly to a point on the V DENOTES GUY ANCHOR FES INVERT 00 Westerly line of said Lot 7, said point being 150 feet Northeasterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 7 (as measured along said Westerly line) 816.69 OHW DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRES ELEVATION=813.07 and there terminating; T - DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE AND lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southeast corner of said Lot 6, at an angle of 64 degrees, 19 minutes 30 seconds, measured from North .69 DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT to West, to the Westerly line of said Lot 6, and there terminating; BASIS OF BEARINGS: ASSUMED SITE ADDRESS: 7910 LAKE DRIVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE 81744� EXCEPTING therefrom, on all above, any part lying within the plat of Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 17. TOTAL AREA: 30,480 SQ. FT OR 0.70 ACRES ---SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 7 \\ 814.38 \ BENCHMARK SANITARY MANHOLE COVER ------I-- ELEVATION=816.26 ASSUMED INVERT ELEVATION=799.16 3 I N I N wo STORM SEWER MANHOLE COVER I A �,1\ RIM=817.29 S 817.29 INVERT=813.2t RECORD DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) o m I / 1 m i 3 00 1 � / \\ 1 815.89 / N \ 1 I OH W \\ 1 �\ nuu I REPLACE STREET IN KIND. - TYPICAL (HATCHED). SEE SHEET C6 UTILITY PLAN L E G E N D it O DENOTES 12 INCH COMMON SPIKE SET WITH WASHER STAMPED RLS 16464 OR AS NOTED. DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND SIZE, TYPE, & R.L.S. AS NOTED. . xxx.xx DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION --- xxx ---- DENOTES EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR - G -DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE - W -DENOTES WATER MAIN OR SERVICE -ss-DENOTES SANITARY SEWER OR SERVICE -sTm-DENOTES STORM SEWER OR SERVICE n DENOTES CHAIN -LINK FENCE 0 DENOTES WOOD FENCE © DENOTES TELECOM PEDESTAL QT DENOTES TELECOM MANHOLE OD DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE OS DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE g DENOTES WATER VALVE � DENOTES UTILITY POLE o DENOTES GUY ANCHOR OHw- DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRES T - DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE V DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT F-1 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE 13.07 FES INVERT ELEVATION=813.07 1) MO tTION __P AN 816.87 i' ---------------- ---___ - - - - - - - - - - - 816.58 * 816.67 Y- 817.18 �i'X 816.64 816.10 N63'37'51 "W 0 X 815.52 i i i i r G I $1N I 1813.99 I I I I I \ I \ I\ I \ I \ 815.62 I \ I \ I \ I I \ 10 0 I \ I \ I \ \ I \ 813.87 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. / / / / 814.09 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / f f / f f I I I I I I I I I / I I I I / I 41 814.00 \ ELEVATION=813.33 I BOTTOM STRUCTURE ELEVATION=811.39 --- -- _ 814.15 ��'--------- ------ 8" ORIFICE INVERT ,,-'��---------------813--------------- - _______------- ---- + 812.a7 ------------------- STM a15.oa ELEVATION=812.08 ___ _ 15"RCP STM ------------------ ___ _----------------- -� + a12.1e 812.90--------------__ 812 73 / � �__-------- * 812.60 - -_-- _ 812.45 1.812.15 812.24 \ 815.87 / ha `` i\\\`--------------------813------- X 812.35 ''///// __---------- \ 812.15 FES INVERT ---__ ___-------------- +a12.a6 \ + \ I I c I ELEVATION=812.54 �'��---------814-------------------------------- I------J - � 813.79------------- \ I- - - --------------------- __-- RGQ`�\-'' ------------------------ \ -815- - - - ------------- - __,____--------------816:18- , ��---817------- 15 `---------- --�------------- -__ ,, CONCRETE CURB + 81a.11 \ J / co 817.35 817.39-------------------- _ -- - - - - - - 817.21 - 816.94 816---------------. ----- �N ") voi�� 'Fill QP BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT CONCRETE CURB 816.57\``--------------------------------------- 816.51 7910 LAKE DRIVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014 816.45 0� IM m rF 816.58 G BASIS OF BEARINGS: ASSUMED SITE ADDRESS: 7910 LAKE DRIVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014 TOTAL AREA: 30,480 SQ. FT OR 0.70 ACRES Client: MR. PAUL SELBITSCHKA Design by Original date I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by PRECISION TUNE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER JF 10-11-2021 me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 550 LILAC STREET LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Drawn by Revisions Jonathan L. Farad Date 10-11-202021 Minnesota Reg. No. 16464 PHONE: 651-784-1100 RP LAKE AND LAND SURVEYING, INC. Survey book No. Page title SURVEYING/CIVIL ENGINEERING DEMOLITION PLAN 1200 CENTRE POINTE, SUITE 375 S.A.P.number Sheet number of ST PAUL, MN. 55120 PHONE (651) 776-6211 E-MAIL' JONFARACI@HOTMAILCOM 2021.375 i 0 W N S tT P AN z p E� m 177.84 N63°37'51 "W ------ 20.0 ----- -7-- 00 jjf I I I I I I I I I 0 ------ 15.0------ ao 0 oo TRASH GRAPHIC SCALE 6 PARKING SPACES BITUMINOUS i - - - - - - 10 0 5 10 20 40 I I I I BITUMINOUS ( IN FEET ) I 0 1 inch = 10 ft. A N I I I BITUMINOUS I / I ' w �p 75.0 O� a- 7Z- STEP c6 z � BITUMINOUS w �Y LANDING I z p0 00 CN U) I co in I I o PROPOSED BUILDING 'LO < < SLAB ON GRADE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION=817.55 BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED w [ < BITUMINOUS T� a fn I� z O O - o d N rn L0 U-----15.0 ------- -------18.5-- ; ---- N -----------24.0---------- -------- 18.0------- -6.0- f- Cy - - W Qf Q BITUMINOUS � 20'R ----------- 24.0---------- --------18.5-------- I 75.0 I I I I � I I I rn3 � I I I I 00 N BITUMINOUS I � N BITUMINOUS I I I I I I I I I I I I ' BITUMINOUS I 20'R O O Li I I I I I I I I � I W N `, \ z S63`48'04"E 250.49 �� o co ��t7 W z P w �P o CONCRETE CURB / \ C 3 CONCRETE CURB 7910 LAKE DRIVE, LINO LAKES, MN 5 5 014 m PR�\NG P BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT OoS U U Client: MR. PAUL SELBITSCHKA Design by Original date I certify that this plan, specification, a repot was prepared by PRECISION TUNE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER JF 10-11-2021 me a under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 550 LILAC STREET LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Drawn by Revisions Jonathan L. PHONE: 651-784-1100 RP 0 ;$;816.26 GRAPHIC SCALE °� I I IN T n INT FP TD n 1D A IN\ T10 p 5 10 20 40 COVER STORM SEWER MANHOLE COVER RIM=817.29817.29 INVERT=813.24t RECORD I DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) OH W OH W TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION SITE ENTRANCE PAD, HATCHED, (SEE DETAIL) OR USE EXISTING BITUMINOUS ENTRANCE PAD. INSTALL MANHOLE RIM=817.3f INVERT=813.0f RECORD DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) ------I--ELEVATIONK816.216 ASSUMED OLE INVERT ELEVATION=799.16 IL \4 GU RDIAN TURRET TYPICAL (01 I rf7 I I 00 I I 1 I IN STM 10 13.07 FES INVERT ELEVATION=813.07 � INSTALL ENKAMAT AND RAIN A , --------- 817------------------ ''-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 816.58 * 816.67 -- Y- 817.18 ,i' X 816.64 816.10 _------ ,, 814.IJ ----- 8" ORIFICE INVERT __ __-------------813---------- STM 815.oa ELEVATION-812.08 -------------- 15"RCP STM - 812.45 r�,815.87 / Ir i \�-� __ ---'_-------------------813-------__ ___-____ x m /'-7 1 -'� I i---- FES INVERT�- �`�-J i ELEVATION=812.54 _____-----814---------- ------ 5 R GP `� ----------------- - - - -815-- `------ ---'--------- - - i _ - / <o 817.35 817.39-------------------- _-__- xan.21 ------ -_ - - - li + f STM CONCRETE CURB -------------------816---------- ---- . _ ___ 816.57 11 I BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT 816.45 (OPTIONAL) m n r -ENGINEERING FABRIC rF 816.58 irvaiP%LL JILT rLl\VG VR VIV 1[VLL.7, (SEE DETAIL) ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. X 815.52 r' I I I r813.99 I I ' L E G E N D I ` DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT. I `�\ i,, DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT. 9,5.62 i `�\ DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE. I \\ Qs DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE. ;D; DENOTES EXISTING STORM (DRAINAGE) MANHOLE. I ��\ DENOTES PROPOSED STORM (DRAINAGE) MANHOLE. �\ D4 DENOTES EXISTING GATE VALVE. DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE. ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN. ■ DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN. �\ m DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE UTILITY BOX. DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE. co_, DENOTES EXISTING UTILITY POLE. DENOTES EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING BOX. 814.10 ED DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX. lip � +814.10 T DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION LINE. 0o w- DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN. 2 -SS- DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. -STM- DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER. 814.68 UG- DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE. y WIRE - UE - DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC. -OHw- DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITIES - o - DENOTES CHAIN -LINK FENCE ------ xxx-------- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR 111110- XXX DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR SILT FENCE AND/OR BIOROLLS DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE ® DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION X xxx.xx DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE 1. Sequence of Erosion Control Construction Activities a) Installation of silt fence or Bio Rolls prior to any construction activity. b) Installation of rock construction entrance prior to any construction activity. c) The site shall be re -vegetated within 48 hours of final grading. d) Install landscaping as per landscape plan. 2. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures All best management practices (BMPS) determined by the Engineer to be effective are available for use on the site. BMPs anticipated to be used on the Project include the following: * Silt Fence * Concrete Mixing/Washout Basins shall be taken offsite * Final Landscaping with Seed, Fertilizer, Topsoil or Sod * Street Sweeping 3. Inspection and Maintenance The Contractor is responsible for providing, maintaining and removing all Erosion Control BMPs, as set forth above, which includes all materials, equipment and labor. Owner is responsible for having the Contractor install, maintain and remove the BMPs as set forth above. 814.00 LN1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 812.15 \ 'IL 813.79 \\ \ Y- 814.11 LAKE DRIVE, LAKES, �� E gill QP 55014 Client: MR. PAUL SELBITSCHKA Design by Original date I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by PRECISION TUNE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER JF 10-11-2021 me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 550 LILAC STREET LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Drawn by Revisions Jonathan L. Farad Date 10-11 -20-2021 Minnesota Reg. No. 16464 PHONE: 651-784-1100 RP LAKE AND LAND SURVEYING, INC. Survey book No. Page title SURVEYING/CIVIL ENGINEERING EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1200 CENTRE POINTE, SUITE 375 S.A.P.number Sheet number of ST PAUL, MN. 55120 PHONE (651) 776-6211 E-MAIL' JONFARACI@HOTMAILCOM 2021.375 U �$'8`16.26 00 R BENCHMARTARY ------I--ELEVATIONK816.216 ASSUMED OLE COVER INVERT ELEVATION=799.16 UTI ITY P AN N INSTALL ENKAMAT AND RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET, TYPICAL BROAD -CREST RECTANGULAR WEIR, SEE DETAIL STORM SEWER MANHOLE COVER 8 1 , 1\ 5.0 FT LONG BY 0.5 FT BREADTH RIM=817.29 --a-1 INVERT=813.24t RECORD 817.29 W i it \\\ i / \\\ a1s.a7+--------- 817------------------ -------------------------- --------------___ _____ ------------_________ _- CD DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) o 1 i \ i ` Ni \\ \\\-------------- 817.06 Z\\ 1 \\ 816.58 816.67 - ___- � 817.18 /��''/ X 816.64 1 BREACH 1 + 816.10-'------___ ,_- OH W INSTALL 25'-15" RCP IV O 1.14X GRADE INSTALL MANHOLE RIM=817.3f INVERT=813.0f RECORD DRAWINGS (FIELD VERIFY) 39'-6" PVC SCH 40 O 2.56X GRADE REPLACE STREET IN KIND, TYPICAL (HATCHED) V) In 13.07 FES INVERT ELEVATION=813.07 PARABOLIC CHANNEL 5.7 FT WIDE X 1 FT DEEP 177.84 N63°37'51 "W X 815.52 r' I $1N NV 1813.99 I I I I I \ I \ I\ I \ I \ 815.62 I \ I \ I \ I I \ 10 0 I \ I \ I \ \\ \ 814.00 -IL / 814.15 ------ 8" ORIFICE INVERT ,,-'�---------------813--------------- _ _------_2.73 -- + 812.47 '------------------------ - STM STM 815.o4 ELEVATION=812.08 ''------------------------ a1z.73 15"RCP - - 812.90------- _____ �812.45 -- -1-812.15 812.24 815.87 / Np `` i \\\�- ___''-�------------------813------- X 812.35 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -k 814.00 \ 1\ e \` I r mr-7 I - �812.46 �-- ------------------ 812.15 \\\ i�-- FES INVERT ---__ ___------------- - \ + \ I I c I ELEVATION=812.54 �'-�---------814-------------------------------- - - - -� +'81az6--____-� \ \ 'IL 813.79 `\ --- - - - - �--------------------------------- \ _--__---- - L--- - - - ------------------------ --------------1 -815- s18 YL \ \ \\ 814.11 \ C --817------- \_--------- ---------_____ ONCRETE CURB C 817.35 817 3-9 - - - - 817.21 X -�' ------------------ li + f 51M CONCRETE CURB - els.sa ----------------816---------------." . ------ - - - - 816.57 �.51 1 I BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT +816.45 -01 I IM m rF 816.58 G 0\10M\NooS BASIS OF BEARINGS: ASSUMED SITE ADDRESS: 7910 LAKE DRIVE, LINO LAKES, MN 55014 TOTAL AREA: 30,480 SQ. FT OR 0.70 ACRES LAKE DRIVE, LAKES, �N "' IG �,°y QP Y 55014 Client: MR. PAUL SELBITSCHKA Design by Original date I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by PRECISION TUNE AUTOMOTIVE CENTER JF 10-11-2021 me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 550 LILAC STREET LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Drawn by Revisions Jonathan L. Farad Date 10-11-202021 Minnesota Reg. No. 16464 PHONE: 651-784-1100 RP LAKE AND LAND SURVEYING, INC. Survey book No. Page title SURVEYING/CIVIL ENGINEERING UTILITY PLAN 1200 CENTRE POINTE, SUITE 375 S.A.P.number Sheet number of ST PAUL, MN. 55120 PHONE (651) 776-6211 E-MAIL' JONFARACI@HOTMAILCOM 2021.375 Architect 75' Floor Plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 55' BUILDING FOUNDRY Building Foundry LLC 4501 Hunters Ridge Road Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Brian.Lubben@BuildingFoundry.com 612.849.092 www.buildingfoundry.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signed: Brian Lubben Date: 8 November 2021 License Number: 21049 Consultant Project Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes 7910 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Project Number: 2021-12 Owner Paul Selbitschka 550 Lilac Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 pselbitschka@msn.com 651.784.1100 www.precisiontune.com/locations/lino-lakes-mn/ Issue Purpose: Appraisal Issue Date: 8 November 2021 @ 2021 Building Foundry LLC Revisions: Sheet Content Floor Plan Sheet Number Am 10 1 Sheet 2 of 3 Architect 75 feet long building I I I I I I I I I - I I _ I E------------------I----C------------------------------------ Material Area Percent Split face concrete block 966 71.5 South Elevation i /v = 1--r Steel garage doors 360 26.7 Glass doors and windows 24 1.8 Totals 1,350 100 75 feet long building Full cutoff LED wallpack, typical p Split face colored concrete block, typical garage doors, typical 0000 CZ) CZ) CZ) o coocvo I I I I I I I I I L I I E------------------------------------:1----I----=_____________I Material Area Percent Split face concrete block 918 68.0 North Elevation 1 8 1 Gil Steel garage doors 360 26.7 Glass doors and windows 72 5.3 Totals 1,350 100 55 feet wide building Full cutoff LED wallpack, typical M Split face colored concrete block, typical I I I I I I I I I L I E--------------------------------------Z----L1 Material Area Percent Split face concrete block 966 97.6 Steel garage doors 0 0 Glass doors and windows 24 2.4 Totals 990 100 55 feet wide building East Elevation 18- . 1,-Gil Internally lighted signage 18 feet high building, typical llrpf(e40crl I VII-3e. AW11—It G al Lr Split face Colored concrete black, typical Split face paint- ed concrete block, typical l .1 Split face painted concrete block, typical I I I I I I I I I _________________________==�_______________� Material Area Percent Split face concrete block 822 83.0 West Elevation I r 1, 4„ Steel garage doors 0 0 Glass doors and windows 168 17.0 Totals 990 100 BUILDING FOUNDRY Building Foundry LL( 4501 Hunters Ridge Road Minnelonka, Minnesota 55345 Brian. Lubben@ du ildirlg Faundry_cam 612.849.092 ww w.build ingfoundry_com I hereby certify thel this plan, specification, or reporl was prepared by me or under my direct suparwi5ion and that am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of Ihn state of Minnesota. Signed. Brian Lubben Dale: 8 November 2021 License Numhcr: 21049 Consullont Project Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes 791 0 lake Drive Lino lakes. Minnesoto 55014 Project Number: 2021.12 Owner Paul Selbitschka 550 Lilac Street Lino lakes. Minnesota 55014 pselbitschka@msn.com 651 _78C 1100 www.precisiontu ne.comlilocations!hno•lakes•mn;' Issue Purpose: Appraisal Issue Date: 8 November 2021 2021 Building Foundry LL( Revisions: Sheol Conlent EIevation Sheet Number A=103 Sheel 3 of 3 8'-8" 10'-0" Two, 2 to 3 yard Poured concrete slab Garbage Enclosure Plan Painted treated wood gates with handles and lock C L 6 0' C a a 0 N -a C �a Garbage Enclosure 1/4" = 1'-0" Precision Tune Auto Care of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes, Minnesota Building Foundry LK buildingfoundry.com,18 November 2021 IIi101 Split face colored concrete block to match building, typical Rear Elevation 8'-8" Split face colored concrete block to match building, typical Front Elevation Right Side Elevation 6'-0" 6'-0" I I SEED/SOD LINE r , / RIP -RAP PER CIVIL PLANS Ix I O• Jf 5- PROPERTY LINE NATIVE SEED AREA SEE NOTES. ' :.: �• Am 4 ' \ 30'-TURF SOD STRIP BEHIND CURB, CONTINUOUS. BUFFER PLANTINGS, TYP. X 5 ! X UTILITIES PER 5 X CIVIL PLANS un AV SIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANS v TRASH ENCLOS-URE PER ARCH. PLANS. r PAVING PE SEED/SOD LINE \PROPERT\7'LINIE / ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT NATIVE SEED AREA SEE NOTES. a f-- SEED�/SOD LINE q Aa I GRADING PER CIVIL PLANS Landscape Materials Legend: Proposed Turf Sod Native Seed Area - See Sheet L1.2 for Mix Landscape Requirements: (a) Foundation Landscape: 2 Large Trees + 6 Large Shrubs per 100 If of Building: 260If Building = 3 Trees and 18 Shrubs (b) Open Areas Landscape: 1 Large Tree + 3 Large Shrubs per 2,000 sf of Open Area: 6,150sf = 3 Trees and 9 Shrubs (c) Basic Use Area Existing Trees To Remain: 0 (d) Basic Use Area Trees To Be Removed: 0 BUA Mitigation Trees Required: 0 (e) Non -Basic Use Area Existing Trees To Remain: 0 (f) Non -Basic Use Area Trees To Be Removed: 0 Non BUA Mitigation Trees Required: 0 (g) Existing Trees As Credit: 0 (h) Required Bufferyards: Between Parking Lot and Public ROW - 30" Hgt. (i) Tree Canopy Coverage Calculations: 13,350 X 40% = 5,340sf required Existing Trees: 0 New Large Trees: 5 New Medium Trees: 2 New Small Trees: 0 Total Coverage Provided: 5,700sf Landscape Requirements: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for grading layout and requirements. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lino Lakes Public Works Department. 3. Sod all disturbed areas except plant beds and mulch beds. 4. Install tree mulch ring on new trees planted in turf and seeded areas. 5. Refer to Sheet L1.2 for Plant Schedules, Notes, and Details. 6. All existing utilities must be field verified and located. Consultant: CAL YX DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture I Planning 475 Cleveland Avenue N. I Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 telephone: 651.788.9018 internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com Project: Precision Tune Auto Care Lino Lakes, MINI Certification: Q 5 SCALE: AS NOTED DATE: 11 /08/2021 REVISIONS: i / I co I RIP -RAP PER CIVIL PLANS xnow what's below. \ Call before you dig. LANDSCAPE PLAN: SCALE: 1" = 12'-0" NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 Consultant: NOTES: DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTII PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINA LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MA PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TE BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EC THE CROWN. FIELD STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INSTALL 6" WHITE PERFORATED FIELD TILE TRUNK GUARDS BY OCTOBER 15. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN ' CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED -FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING. NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL) PER NOTES. INSTALL TOMAHAWK SUB -SURFACE TREE ROOT BALL STABILIZER HOOKS, MINIMUM OF (2) PER TREE. ABOVE -GRADE STAKES AND GUY WIRES ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED. MULCH RING: 6 FT. DIA. MINIMUM 8FT. DIA. PREFERRED EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTO PLANTING HOLE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. ENSURE PLANT PITS PASS REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST AS OUTLINED IN NOTE #27. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE PLANT SCHEDULE OVERSTORY TREE CODE BOTANICAL NAME Aa Acer x freemanii 'Jeffsred' TM Co Celtis occidentalis Un Ulmus x'New Horizon' ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME 0 Ms Malus x 'Spring Snow' COMMON NAME Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple Common Hackberry New Horizon Elm COMMON NAME ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES. 3" DEPTH WATERING BASIN MULCH PER NOTES FINISHED GRADE PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE WIDTH. TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE SIZE CONTAINER OTY 2.5" Cal. B&B 3 3" Cal. B&B 1 2.5" Cal. B&B 1 SIZE CONTAINER OTY Spring Snow Crab Apple 2" Cal. B&B 2 CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE Am Aronia melanocarpa 'Morton' TM Iroquis Beauty Black Chokeberry 5 gal if Juniperus chinensis'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper Seeding Specification. -- Seed in the Storm Water Areas (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be: MnDOT #33-261 Stormwater South & West, worked into the topsoil layer at 35.00 Ibs per acre. Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications. Stormwater South $ w�4r Common Name Scientific Name Rate (lblac) Rate (kglha) °¢ of Mix Eby weight) Seeds; sq ft big bluesteln Andre o oro oonardii 2.00 2.24 5.72-0,c 7.35 frill ed brome Bromus Gl arus 2.00 2.24 5.73�.'C, 8.10 Virginia wild rye El otters Virgmicus 1.50 1.68 4,28°gib 2.31 fowl bluegrass Poa palustris 1.08 1.19 3.03°gib 50.70 slender wheatgrass El onus tract caules 1.00 1.12 2.85-0,c, 2.53 switchgrass Pang cerru vir atforrr 0.38 0.43 1.07-0,c, 1.93 prairie cordgrass S arVna PLOGrinara 0.38 0.43 1.07-0,o 0.91 Indian wass Sorghastrum nutans 0.12 0.13 4),36fl._ 0.55 blLleoint Calam agros tls canzdensls 0.043 0.07 U,18°_ 6.40 Grasses Subtoto 8.50 9,53 24.29-0`- 80.78 awl-fri.lited sedge Carex sri ato 0.25 0.28 U,71°.. 3.10 €I ark green bulrush Sclr vs a rro vlrens 0.19 0.21 0, 54% 31.70 wool rass Sclr vs cyperinus 0.03 0.07 0,19 gib 39.00 Sedges 8, Rushes Subtotal 0.50 0.66 1.43% 73.80 olden alexanders Zara aurea 0.20 0,22 0.56% 4.79 autumn sneexeweed Heleniunp aertton?pafe 0.13 0,15 0.36% 6.97 marsh (milkweed Ascle ias incarnata 0.11 0.12 0.32°gib 0.20 leafy beqgarticks Bidens frondosa 0.11 0.12 0.31°gib 0.20 Canada anemone Anemone canadensrs 0.07 0.08 0,19°gib 0.20 obedient plant Pla soste is of iniana 0.07 0.08 0,21°gib 0.30 tall coneflower Rudbeekfa lacinista 0.07 0.08 0.21% 0.37 New England aster Symphy0trichuln "Ova'a-arc fide 0.07 0.08 0,19% 1.56 flat -tapped aster Ooeilfro erla ambeiiato 0.0.6 0.07 0.17�.c, 1.50 spotte d J o e p ye weed Eurro cloium ma culatum 0.08 0.07 0,1 a% 2.19 blue verYaill Verbena hastata 0.05 0.06 0,15% 1.85 Fores Subtotal 1.00 1.12 2.85�.c, 15.13 Oats Avena sarlva 25.00 28.02 1 71,43% 11.14 Cover Crop Subtotal 1 25.00 28.02 1 71.43% 11.14 Total 1 35.00 39,23 1 100.00% 180.85 Purpose; Stormwater pond edges. Lein porarilyflooded dry ponds, and temporarily flooded ditch bottoms. Planting ,Area; Tallgrass Aspen Parklands, Prairie Parkland, and Eastern Broadleaf Forest Provinces. Mri Districts 2 west , 3B, 4, Metro, 6, 7 & B. 5 gal. CONTAINER OTY Pot 12 Pot 15 NATIVE SEED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS: Native Grass and Farb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3) Year 1 Establishment (spring seeding): I Preaare site - Late Apri - May. 2i Seed - May 1 - June 1. Maintenance: 1) Motu ifi-B inches} -every 30 days after planting until Seotember K. 2)'Need Control - mowing shou d help control annua 'Weeds. Spot saraythistles etc. Establishment (fall seeding): 1i Preaare site - Late August- ear y Seaten•ber. 21 Seed - late Septen•ber to freeze-up. Maintenance (following season): 1i FAow ifi-B inches) -once in May; June and July. 2)'Need Control -mowing shou d keeo annual weeds down. Soot spraythistles etc. Evaluation: 1) Cover crop growing wthin 2 weeks of planting (ex ceA dormant plant ngs,. 2) Seedlings spaced 1-5 inches apart in dri I rows. 3) IN at ve grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches to I. 4i If there is a flush of growth from foxta I etc., n, ow as necessary. Year 2 Maintenance: 1 i Move i6-B inches) onetime between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed. 2) ;."eed Control -mowing Chou d keeo annual weeds down. Soot spray thistles etc. 3% Sowe sites way not require much maintenance the second year. Evaluation: 1'r Cover cropwi I be gone unless winter wh eat was used in afa I planting. 2i Grosses forming clun•ps 1-6 inches apart n drill rows, but sti I short. 3i Son•e flowers should be bloom ng {black-eyed Simons, bergamot etc.;•. 4% If there is a flush of growth from foxta I etc., n, ow site. Year 3 Maintenance: 1'r FAow on y f necessary. 3i 'Need Control - Spot spray th stles; etc. 4i S tes usua Iy do not require much n•a ntenance the third year. Evaluation: 1) P anting should beg it looking like n prair e - tall grasses, f owers etc. Long-term Maintenance: 1)'Need Control - Spot spray th sttes etc. 2) 6uming f3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fa I f possib e. 3) Faying (3 year rotas on) late summer or early fall. A ternate with burn ng (may substitute for burning;. 4) 6uming two years in a row will real y"clean up rough -looking sites. NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD: Method 1. Drop Seeding Onto Tilled Sites Th s s the "standard" method for seeding native species on prepared s tes such as those on construction projects. A) Site Preparation -The site should be prepared by loosening tooso I to a min mum depth of 3 inches. B) Fertilizer - If not bas ng the fertilizer appl cation on soil test resu ts, the fertilizer used Chou d be a comwercial grade slaw release con•p ete fertilizer app ied at a rate of 30D bdacre at the time of preparing the seed bed for seeding. The fertilizer should contain 10-20-2-- CNPK) analysis. C) Seed Installation -Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will accurate y meter the types of seed to be planted and keep all seeds uniformly nixed during planting (Tril ion-tyne;. The seeder should contain a m nimum of three seed boxes: a f ne seed box, a box for largelfluffy seeds, and a box for cool season or grains. It should be equipped with drop tubes and a packer assembly to compact the soil directly over the seed. All seeding shou d be done at a r ght angle to surface dra nage. D) Seeding Rates -Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the spec Pied m x. E) Harrowing - The s to should be I ght y harrowed or raked follow ng seeding if the seeder does not contain a cutipcker. Landscape Notes: 1. Tree saucer mulch to be four inches (4") depth single -shred hardwood mulch for trees outside of a plant bed. Install per tree planting detail. 2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control. 3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. All deciduous trees are measured at 48" from finished grade to determine tree diameter (DBH). All coniferous trees are measured from finished grade to the top of the central leader. If no central leader is present on coniferous trees, that plant is rejected and must be replaced immediately. 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval. 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. 8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified. 9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. 10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. 11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. 12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material for the duration of the plant warranty, with the exception of turf sod, which shall be maintained for 30 days after installation or until the first mowing, whichever comes first. Contractor must bag clippings from initial mowing and remove from the job site. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to warranty start shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with O&M information, including (but not limited to), written instructions on proper lawn mowing height, yearly lawn maintenance recommendations, proper plant pruning information, plant & lawn fertilization schedule, and disease/pest control. 13. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material (turf and plants) for one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 25% die -back damage during the warranty period shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner, with a one-time replacement limit. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the warranty period. Prune dead & broken branches at end of warranty period. 14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc. 15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. 16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. 17. Replacement and repairs requested by the Owner during the warranty period must be made within 14 business days of the request. 18. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off -site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 19. Irrigation: The landscape contractor shall furnish an Irrigation Layout Plan for head -to -head coverage of all tree, turf and shrub planting areas. Use commercial -grade Hunter irrigation equipment and provide product cut -sheets and (4) copies of the proposed layout plan to the landscape architect for review and approval prior to installation. Coordinate irrigation connection point, controller, back -flow and valving locations with the mechanical engineer, architect, & general contractor. Include 1 fall shut -down and spring start-up in irrigation bid. PVC sleeves are required to be placed under paved areas. This effort is to be coordinated between the landscape contractor, irrigation contractor, excavator, paving contractor, and General Contractor. If a working irrigation system exists on the property, tie the new system into the existing. 20. Turf Sod activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2014 edition, for turf bed preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. Sod installer is to place (2) metal sod staples per roll of sod regardless of slope. On slopes 6:1 or greater, install (4) metal sod staples per roll of sod. 21. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. 22. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. Remove trees where noted on the civil plan, including the stump to 30" below grade. 23. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. 24. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. 25. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate with the general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc. n 26. To soil Re uirements: All raded areas of the site that are desi Hated on the Ian set for turf shall have no less than 6 of im orted to soil areas desi Hated p q 9 9 p p p 9 for shrubs, trees, and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MnDOT classifications for planting soil for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building. 27. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub -grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on -center and filled with MnDOT Free -Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re -test sub -grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. 28. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. 29. Wood Mulch: All plant beds (except where noted) shall receive 4" depth locally available single -shred hardwood mulch over fabric weed mat. Submit sample for Owner approval. 30. All edger shall be professional grade perforated steel edger, Coyote or equal. Anchor every 18" on -center (minimum). Submit sample. C A X DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture I Planning 475 Cleveland Avenue N. I Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 telephone: 651.788.9018 internet: www.calyxdesigngroup.com Project: Precision Tune Auto Care Lino Lakes, MN Certification: J Q� SCALE: AS NOTED DATE: 11 /08/2021 REVISIONS: LANDSCAPE DETAILS F) Packing - Cultiacking the s to following harrowing is recomn•ended to ensure a firn• seed bed. G) Mulch -The site should he mulched and disc -anchored follow- ng pack ng using one of thefo lowing types of n•u ch Cis Der plans orsoec-al prow sions;: ■ Know vAat i beIQW • Mn1COT Type 3 (MCIA certified weed free n•ulch) ata rate of 2.0 tons per acre. ■ fRall htzfur'e yDG dig. Prairie haylma 4 ulch (MnIDOT Type 7 or 8) at rate of 2.0 tons per acre. LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES: L 1 .2 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: Katie Larsen, City Planner December 8, 2021 Belland Farms Final Plat FP2021-006 Rehbein Properties Attn: Matt Rehbein 7625 24th Avenue N Lino Lakes, MN 55038 DRF Lino Eye Building, LLC Attn: Ross Hedlund 7101 W. 78t' Street Minneapolis, MN 55439 OWNER: Rehbein Properties Attn: Matt Rehbein 7625 24th Avenue N Lino Lakes, MN 55038 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: November 10, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: January 11, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 8, 2021 City Council Work Session: N/A City Council Meeting: January 10, 2022 BACKGROUND The applicant, Rehbein Properties, submitted a land use application for the final plat of Belland Farms. The plat creates 2 commercial lots. Lot 1 is 1.76 acres for the purpose of constructing a 12,230 sf medical eye clinic. Lot 2 will be a future commercial development and a formal site plan will be reviewed at later date. The name of the final 1 plat is Belland Farms. The name of the medical eye clinic is Associate Eye Care Partners (AECP). This staff report is based on the following information: oo Belland Farm Civil Plan Set prepared by Carson McCain revision date November 8, 2021 oo Associate Eye Care Partners Eye Clinic Building Site Improvement Plans prepared by Carlson McCain revision date November 8, 2021 oo Belland Farms Civil and Street Construction Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 8, 2021 oo Architectural Plans and Perspectives prepared by SRa revision date November 15, 2021 oo Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain revision date November 8, 2021 oo Final Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons dated November 8, 2021 Previous Council approvals: oo November 8, 2021: Resolution No. 21-115 Approving Preliminary Plat This staff report provides a comparison of the approved preliminary plat and the proposed final plat. Changes in the plans are either narratively described or shown as tfikethr- ,,,g (deletions) or underline (additions). Overall, the final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat. ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions The 18 acre site is located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH 14 (Main Street) and 24th Avenue. 241h Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue is the municipal boundary between the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Hugo. The site is currently vacant commercial land with cropland, a small wooded area and wetlands. A 66 ft wide Minnesota Pipeline Easement bisects the site. Elevations range from 920EL in the south east portion of site down to 912EL at wetland in northwest corner of site. The soils are clayey sand and sandy lean clay. Hydrologic soil group is C. Groundwater elevations range from 908 to 912EL. Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned GB, General Business and allows for office business -clinical as a permitted use. The parcel is guided commercial per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Current Zoning GB, General Business Existing Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Commercial Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use R-BR, North Rural Business Agricultural Commercial Reserve South LI, Light Industrial Industrial Industrial East PUD Commercial Commercial (City of Hugo) West 1TBusiness Vacant Commercial Commercial Gener Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat, final plat and commercial development are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in regards to the resource management system, land use plan, housing plan, transportation plan and sanitary sewer and water supply plan. The commercial development is also in compliance with zoning code requirements for GB, General Business and performance standards as detailed below. Blocks and Lots The revised preliminary plat contains Lots 4-2 1-3, Block 1 and Outlots A-B, Belland Farms. Lot 3 was added as required. Parcel Acres T Purpose Lot 1, Block 1 1.76 acres Medical Eye Clinic Lot 2, Block 1 4-.99 1.97 acres Potential Future Daycare Lot 3, Block 1 1.38 acres Future Development Outlot A 0- 6 0.45 acres Stormwater Pond Outlot B 12.93 11.15 acres Future development TOTAL 17.0416.71 acres Since there is no underlying preliminary plat and development plans for Outlot B, the outlot will need to be preliminary and final platted in the future. This will be similar to the development of Main Street Shoppes and Otter Crossing to the west. Outlot A contains a publicly maintained stormwater pond and it shall be deeded to the City after it has been installed, established and approved by the City. Streets and Alleys Rosemary Way is a public street aligning with Rosemary Way in the City of Hugo and extends from 24th Avenue west across the north lot lines of Lots 1-2, Block 1. The public street is proposed at 32 ft wide paved back to back with 69 66ft of street right-of-way. Additional street right-of-way may be need has been added in order to accommodate a southbound right turn lane and thru and left turn lanes and sidewalk. Street right-of-way 33.5 ft in width is being dedicated along 241h Avenue creating a full 66ft of right-of-way. No additional street right-of-way is required along 241h Avenue. Staff notes Rosemary Way will eventually extend west and connect to Otter Lake Road to serve future development in both Belland Farms and Main Street Shoppes. This connection will create an important "backage road" from the City of Hugo and parallel to CSAH 14/Main Street to support transportation in the area. CSAH 14/Main Street is an A -Minor Connector road and has limited access points throughout the corridor. Southbound 24th Avenue access onto CSAH 14/Main Street is right in/right out. This future street connection is also supported by Lino Lake Public Safety in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response from CSAH 14 and Otter Lake Road. This future street connection is further supported by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.096 LAND REQUIREMENTS. (2) Proposed subdivisions shall be coordinated with surrounding properties and/or neighborhoods so that the city as a whole may develop efficiently and harmoniously. § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. al Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided over the lots lines and over Outlot A. An oversized 30 ft wide drainage & utility easement is provided along the east lot line of Lot 1 for drainage to the stormwater pond. Several separate easement documents have been recorded along CSAH 14 (Main St). These easements are for trail, drainage & utility purposes. A separate trail easement with exhibit shall be recorded for the new trail along 24th Avenue. Staff Comment: 1. Standard drainage & utility easements a minimum of 10 ft wide shall be shown on the preliminary plat and provided on the final plat over Wetlands 1 and 2. Public Land Dedication The City will collect a cash fee of $9,450 $9,399.60 in lieu of land dedication for commercial development for final platted Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Belland Farms. A trail shall be constructed along the west side of 24th Avenue between Rosemary Way and CSAH 14/Main Street. The City will reimburse the developer for the trail construction costs. The trail shall be installed by the developer and maintained by the City. ]Belland Farms5 3.73acres x2,520 per acre = $9,399.60a a Trail construction costs will be reimbursed to the developer. Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan This site and building plan review is only for Lot 1, Block 1, Belland Farms and the proposed 12,230 sf medical eye clinic. Lot 2 indicates a future daycare and site plan review will occur at a future date upon the submission of a separate land use application. Lot 3 will also require a separate land use application for future site and building plan review. The building is located in the southeast corner of the site with parking lot and stormwater pond in the rear yard. Sidewalk extends around the building south to CSAH 14/Main Street. 5 Staff has completed a full site and building plan review of the project. Overall, the proposed site plan and building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Staff Comments: 1. A 5 ft wide concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along the south side of Rosemary Way. a. This has been provided. 2. Future development to the north of Rosemary Way will require sidewalk construction on the north side of the street. 3. An 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail shall be constructed along the west side of 24th Avenue from Rosemary Way to CSAH 14/Main Street. a. This has been provided. 4. The sidewalk north of the building on Lot 1 shall extend east and connect with the new trail. a. Unfortunately, the grade from the sidewalk to the trail will not accommodate an ADA compliant connection. Lot Size and Setbacks The front lot line is along CSAH 14 (Main Street). The rear lot line is along Rosemary Way. This is consistent with Main Street Shoppes and Otter Crossing developments to the west. EMGB Requirements Lotn' Lot 21 Lot 3 Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 7676,908 6� 5 8 f 86 ,899 60,164sf Min Lot Width 100 ft 245 ft 229 ft 170 ft Setbacks -Street Required Proposed Proposed Proposed Principal Building-CSAH 14 (arterial) 40 ft 67 ft 95 ft Future Principal Building-24th Ave (local) 30 ft 30 ft NA Future Parking Lot 15 ft 28 and 31 ft NA Future Setbacks -Side Yard Required Proposed Proposed Proposed Principal Building loft 95 ft 20 & 75 ft Future C� Accessory Building loft NA 16 & 192 ft Future Parking Lot/Driveway loft 20 ft 15 & 35ft Future Setbacks -Rear Yard (Rosemary Way) Required Proposed Proposed Future Principal Building 30 ft 88 ft 200 ft Future Accessory Building (trash enclosure) 5 ft 120 ft 175 ft Future Parking Lot/Driveway loft 20 ft 74 ft Future aA Land Use Application for full Site Plan Review of Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be required upon development of that site. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials The medical eye clinic building is single story with exterior materials consisting of brick, glass and fiber cement panel. The color palette consists of earth tone dark gray, brown, light tan brick, light gray fiber cement panel and dark bronze flashing. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. The building height is 18' 0" which is less than that maximum 45 ft allowed. A trash enclosure is proposed on the north side of the building. Construction details provided on Sheet A200 indicate dark ironspot brick and champagne brick to match the main building. The gate is a dark composite wood swing gate that has 100% opacity. The enclosure is 8' 0" in height. The trash enclosure meets performance standards. Per Sheet A300, the mechanical equipment is located on the rooftop and screened by a mechanical screen. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. Sheet M, Site Photometric Plan indicates light sources exceeding these limits and shall be revised. Light fixtures on the 27 ft high poles are down lit and cutoff as required by city code. Architectural entry access lights are allowed on the front and side elevations. 7 Off -Street Parking Requirements Per City Code Section 1007.044(6), medical clinics require 3 spaces plus at least 1 space per 200 sf of floor area. The 12,480 sf medical eye clinic would require 62 parking stalls. The site plan provides 74 parking stalls so this requirement is met. The site plan shows 4-2- 11 additional future parking stalls west of Outlot A. These stalls are not needed to meet City requirements. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated September 13, 2021, all stormwater from the site currently either drains to a culvert located in the southeast corner of the site or to the north to the wetland located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland located in the southwest corner of the site overflows to the culvert located in the southeast corner of the site. The proposed drainage boundary will contain approximately 2.723 2.942 acres of impervious surface, which includes the public street, Lot 1 and Lot 2 for a net increase of 2.420 2.639 acres. One wet sedimentation basin will be constructed in Outlot A to provide water quality and rate control for the site. Due to onsite soils consisting primarily of clay type soils, infiltration is not feasible at this site. All stormwater that doesn't flow to the basin will ultimately flow to the culvert located in the southeast corner of the site. The proposed stormwater management facility has been reviewed by the City Engineer and RCWD and is compliant for rate control, water quality and volume control. Public Utilities The medical eye clinic and future commercial development will be municipally served by a 27" PVC sanitary sewer located along 24t' Avenue and an.927" PVC sanitary sewer along Rosemary Way. The subject site is located in Utility Staging Area IA (2018-2025) and Sanitary District 5 (Sub -District 5A). Sanitary flows from this district are conveyed to the southeast, discharging into the MCES Lino Lakes Relief Interceptor located at the intersection of CSAH 14 and 24t' Avenue. It should be noted that current development east of I-35E and north of CSAH 14/Main Street in Otter Crossing and Main Street Shoppes is being served by Sanitary Sewer District 3 and the sanitary sewer main located in Otter Lake Road in order to help facilitate and expedite development. Future land development within Sanitary District 5 shall be evaluated for capacity and flow to either District 3 or District 5. N. The development will be municipally served by an S 12" DIP watermain located along 24t' Avenue and Rosemary Way. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The Environmental Coordinator revised the tree preservation, mitigation and landscaping section of the September 29, 2021 Environmental Board staff report as follows: Sheet TP 1, Tree Preservation Plan calls for removal of 46 trees, most of which are in the southern portion of lot 2. Twenty-six (26) removals are in Basic Use Areas, non - Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). These will not require mitigation. There are 20 trees being removed that are not located in Basic Use Areas or Environmentally Sensitive Areas. These trees will require mitigation of 27 trees. However, undesirable species do not have to be mitigated for. Removals of a 22" and 8" ash will not require mitigation trees to be planted. The total number of replacement trees required is 24. 30 mitigation trees have been provided. Tree preservation and mitigation standards have been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 sf. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs 30,544 sq. ft. of open space calls for 16 large trees and 46 large shrubs. 31 large tree or large tree equivalents and have been provided. 35 large shrub or large shrub equivalents have been provided. Note that 30 medium shrubs have been provided and that a changeof species for these 30 shrubs to a larger species (>6ft. height) would meet requirements. I stefmwater- basin, along the tuff area en the Wilding's east per-ifneter-, or- the stefn+wate rdneff area in the sou4b of the building. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. The south edge of the parking lot has a single row of Autumn Magic Black Chokebegy. This should be a triangulated double row as the rest of the south parking lot perimeter has. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Canopy coverage values are calculated per tree based on the anticipated size 15 years after planting, and the distance to hardscape edge from the planting location. Vehicular hardscape planned Canopy cover requirement: Canopy cover provided: 27,227 sq. fi. 33,514 sq. ft. 10,991 sq. . 13,406 sq. ft. 9,350 sq. R. 12,400 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. The 3 large tfees near- the fittufe parkting let just west of the stefmwater- basin weWd add 1, 900 sq. ft. ef eanepy eever- if they were moved eleser- to the par -king lot aeeess road. Altematively, if the ffi4tir-e par4ing lot stalls Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs For 480 340 linear feet of applicable foundation, 4-0 7 large trees and -29 21 large shrubs (or acceptable substitutes) are required for the north, east, and south building faces. 10 The plans indicate 4 lafge tfees, 11 fned41m tfees, 8 lafge shrubs and 116 mediffm shrubs. 3 large trees, 10 medium trees, 22 large shrubs, and 106 medium shrubs. These substitutions are equivalent to 44 9 large trees and 85 92 large shrubs. The foundation landscape requirements have been met. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The area around the stormwater basin will be seeded with MN DOT 34-271 wet meadow seed mix, with 35-241 mesic prairie seed mix at higher elevations extending south along the eastern perimeter. Sod is proposed for the rest of the site. A native seed mix should be used for the low runoff area in the southeast corner of the site in lieu of sod. Native seed mix has been added to this area. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are not required for commercial developments. Signage A monument sign pad is shown on the northwest corner of Lot 1. A separate Sign Permit Application with detailed sign information is required for any on site or building signage. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage per lot in the GB, General Business District is 75%. Lot 1 has 35162% impervious surface. Lot 2 has 52% impervious surface. The proposed post -development impervious surface coverages are compliant. Traffic Study A formal traffic study is not required for the 2 lot commercial subdivision. The updated 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR analyzed traffic impacts for commercial development along this entire corridor. The proposed medical and commercial building are consistent with AUAR Land Use Scenarios #1 and #2 for commercial development. CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an A Minor Collector road and has capacity to handle the commercial traffic. Future development of Outlot B may require a traffic study to evaluate impacts to 24th Avenue, Rosemary Way, CSAH 14/Main Street and Otter Lake Road. 11 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identifies this site as commercial in the land use scenarios. The Belland Farms project is consistent with commercial development. No further environmental assessment is required. Wetlands Per the Wetland Permit Application prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services prepared on September 13, 2021, a WCA Notice of Decision for wetland delineation was issued by RCWD on September 7, 2021. Five (5) wetlands were delineated on site. Wetland Ir Acres 1 2.47 2 0.56 3 0.74 4 0.08 5 0.05 Total 3.9 Per the RCWD CAPROC dated 11/2/2021, the 2 lot commercial subdivision requires llv.739i 0.7928 acres of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 3 and Wetland 5. Wetland impacts will be mitigated via the purchase of wetland bank credits from the City of Blaine Wetland Bank #1664. The wetlands are not within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) so WMC wetland buffers are not required. Staff Comments: 1. Standard drainage & utility easements a minimum of 10 ft wide shall be shown on the preliminary plat and provided on the final plat over Wetlands 1 and 2. 2. Wetlands 4 and 5 are anticipated to be impacted and mitigated with future development and do not require easements at this time. Shoreland District The development is not located in the Shoreland District. 12 Floodplain There is no FEMA Foodplain on site. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the final plat and has no concerns with the plat as proposed. City of Hugo Comments The City of Hugo provided a comment letter on October 4, 2021. They recommend a development and construction phasing plan, transportation corridor study, and Elmcrest Avenue/24t' Avenue and Rosemary Avenue improvements. Future development of Outlot B, Belland Farms will require a thorough analysis of transportation corridors and necessary road improvements with input from Anoka and Ramsey Counties and the City of Hugo. Lino Lakes Public Safety Comments Deputy Director -Fire Division L'Allier notes concerns regarding access to the Belland Farms development for emergency responders if Rosemary Way is not connected to Otter Lake Road sometime in the future. Deputy Director -Police Division Leibel also notes concerns for emergency responders and large apparatus vehicles that need to do a U-turn at Victor Hugo Boulevard to access the development. Rosemary Way connection to Otter Lake Road is supported. Future development of Main Street Shoppes and Belland Farms will require Rosemary Way to connect to Otter Lake Road. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their September 29, 2021 meeting and noted some with minor revisions such as additional inlet protection, additional canopy cover and landscaping are needed. These items have been addressed. City Attorney The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment and final plat and notes the final plat and development agreement shall be recorded prior to any conveyances by Rehbein Properties to a third party. 13 Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City's Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement. The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City as it relates to the Belland Farms final plat. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement will be drafted by the City as is relates to the Associate Eye Care Partners facility. Comprehensive Plan The preliminary and final plat are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan is regards to resource management system, land use plan, housing plan, transportation plan and sanitary sewer and water supply plan. Findings of Fact -Final Plat The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the revised preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and Not applicable. The final plat is for a commercial development. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. 14 The conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Outstanding conditions listed below need to be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylars. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Belland Farms final plat with the following conditions: 1. Rosemary Way street right-of-way extends to the west lot line on the preliminary plat in order to provide future transportation and utility connection to the west. a. Any future phase final plat submittal that shows the Rosemary Way street right-of-way shifting north or south shall not be deemed inconsistent with the preliminary plat provided that such location is approved by the City. 2. Future platting of Outlot B, Belland Farms shall require construction of street and utilities to the west lot line. 3. Future development to the north of Rosemary Way will require sidewalk construction on the north side of the street. 4. Applicable Land Use Applications and submittals are required for future development or platting of Lot 2, Block 1 or Outlot B, Belland Farms. 5. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon and wall signage. 6. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage. 7. Outlot A contains a publicly maintained stormwater pond. The outlot shall be deeded to the City after the stormwater pond improvements, vegetation, and landscaping have been installed, established and accepted by the City. 8. Future development of Outlot B may require a traffic study to evaluate impacts to 24th Avenue, Rosemary Way, CSAH 14/Main Street and Otter Lake Road. 9. A Permanent Trail easement and exhibit shall be recorded over the trail on Lot 1, Block 1, Belland Farms. a. The developer is responsible for the installation of the trail. b. The City is responsible for long term maintenance of the trail. c. The City will reimburse the developer the costs of the trail construction. 10. The final plat and development agreement shall be recorded prior to any conveyances by Rehbein Properties to a third party. The following items being addressed prior to release of final plat mylars: 1. All comments from the City Engineer Memo dated December 1, 2021 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator Memo dated November 9, 2021 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department letter dated September 23, 2021 shall be addressed. 4. The applicant shall provide documentation from the owner of the pipeline easement allowing for construction and improvements in easement. 5. The applicant shall draft a deed for Outlot A. 15 6. The applicant shall draft the Permanent Trail Easement and Exhibit for staff review. 7. Belland Farms Plan Set: a. Sheet 3, Preliminary Plat: i. Standard drainage & utility easements a minimum IOft wide shall be provided over Wetlands 1 and 2. 1. Some of the easement do not appear to be 10 ft wide. 8. Belland Farms Final Plat: a. Standard drainage & utility easements a minimum IOft wide shall be provided over Wetlands 1 and 2. i. Some of the easements do not appear to be 1 Oft wide. 9. Associate Eye Clinic Partners Plan Set: a. Sheet A300, Exterior Elevations i. A material and color detail for the rooftop mechanical screen shall be provided. b. Page M, Photometric Plan: i. All lot lines shall be clearly marked and foot candle measurements shall extend past the lot lines. Foot candles shall not exceed 1.0 onto street right-of-way or 0.4 onto adjacent property. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. City Engineer Memo dated December 1, 2021 3. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated November 9, 2021 4. Revised Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Grading Plan Set 5. Original Preliminary Plat 6. Final Plat 16 Site Location Map N 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 C IAm 'F O F W E Feet " I Belland Farms-AECP s. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 1 WSb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Kelsey Gelhar, Project Engineer, WSB Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: December 1, 2021 Re: Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Final Plat Review 18966-000/19038-000 WSB has reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plats and Utility Plans for the Belland Farms development and the Associated Eye Care Partners site plan in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Carlson McCain, originally received on September 17, 2021. The plans were revised and resubmitted on November 8, 2021. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and documents: 00 Belland Farms Preliminary Plat prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. and Carlson McCain dated November 8, 2021 o 00 Belland Farms Final Plat & Utility Plans prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. and q Carlson McCain dated November 8, 2021 w 00 Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated September 13, 2021, M revised November 8, 2021 3: 00 Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec Corporation dated JUI RIMUUI 1, LUL I CO oo Associated Eye Care Partners Clinic Building Site Improvement Plans prepared by CO Carlson McCain, dated November 8, 2021 (Referred to as AECP in the memo) N WSB 10/6/2021 comments provided in black. Carlson McCain 11/8/2021 Responses shown in red. LO WSB 12/1/2021 responses and comments shown in blue Engineering a z Grading a The Belland Farms development includes site grading for the street, the proposed N buildings and parking lots, and the stormwater pond. W Comments: W PlaR revised. LU 2 / ppiivarRt-tG Feyiew gFades forFa ford ng iRaged i+nthe -west -ca nd-. A-'c-th if L6+T'2. Thp slepes vapy gFeatly. Why i6thor�e ditGh slepe use flat IGRg the GO = side of +he I et-2-2 H rn W it is no+ possible +e s s the existing pipeline �.yi+h s+nrm s r due to - I- —nflir•+inn nine el—ro+inns Therefore rii+r•h n—Ainn is heinn i—A Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 2 2 Staff reremmenrlo that a minimum olene of n 70/ he used fer roadway graded Plan revised 4. ppliEa�shall update tin e� �t GUrb 'T�Pr�P'o t curb noted where required. motes-and add tip Curb detail on_AECP eU t GUrrb detail Sheet C7 to .,lar . t notes tip out to he +inned eut at 1 " per font 6. Appl+eant shall review Rd update ditch grading a'E)Rg 24111-AveRue. The plaRS make it like the rlitGh will hold water nr-rth of the nU IVert that n c ')filth seem AveRue. • Stormwater Management The stormwater on the site flows to two different places. The southern portion of the site flows to a culvert located in the southeast corner that drains to the City of Hugo. The northern portion of the site flows to the north to an existing wetland in the northwest corner of the site. All of the stormwater from the site eventually flows to Clearwater Creek, which is an impaired water located approximately 0.4 miles south of the site. The surface water will flow to a new wet sedimentation basin. Storm sewer is proposed to collect water from the parking lot and road and then direct it to the proposed Stormwater Pond 1 OP. Some runoff will first be passed through Low Area 20P, before ultimately draining to the basin. Pond 1 OP is designed to discharge southeast to the existing ditch and culvert system. After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 2.42 acres of new impervious surfaces including the streets, parking lots, and rooftops. Groundwater elevations ranged from 908 to 912 throughout the site and no groundwater was detected where the pond is being proposed. Soils consist primarily of sandy lean clay, and clayey sand. Due to these soil types, infiltration is not feasible. The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer conveyance system and basin. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, 100-year rainfall events and 10-day snow melt event. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10- 100- 10-Day Year Year Snowmelt Pre- 4 6.8 4.2 4.2 Development Post- 4 6.3 2.2 2.2 Development Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 3 Post -development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre -development rates. • Water Supply There is existing 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Main Street (CSAH 14) and 241h Avenue. The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan designates trunk watermain extending along a future road extension west of the site. Staff has evaluated the need for the trunk line to go through this site to meet anticipated fire flow needs. The applicant is proposing an 8-inch diameter DIP watermain to serve the development. The watermain will extend north along 24thAvenue and then to the west along the proposed Rosemary Way and dead end at the end of the proposed road. The applicant currently shows 8" watermain stubs to each lot to provide service to the buildings. Comments: 1. Watermain along Rosemary Way and 241h Avenue shall be 12" in diameter. Plan revised. Applicant to update final Belland Farms plans to show impacts to 24th Avenue N from connecting to the existing watermain and installing the new gate valve. 2. Applicant is responsible for verifying water suppression needs for the buildings. Potential looping within the sites may be necessary. Noted. 3. All watermain stubs shall end with a temporary hydrant and gate valve. Do not include gate valves on the stub legs of the watermain. Permanent gate valves will be installed when the watermain is extended in the future. Plan revised. 4. The Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire division will review the hydrant layout. Noted. 5. Applicant to add a gate valve just east of the pipe line easement. 6. Applicant shall install the watermain within the Rosemary Way alignment all the way to the westerly property line with this project and add a hydrant near station 5+00 to keep proper 400-ft hydrant spacing. Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 4 Sanitary Sewer There is an existing 27-inch diameter poly -vinyl chloride (PVC) Metropolitan Council interceptor line located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Main Street (CSAH 14) and 241" Avenue. The invert of the stub is approximately 899.93 and is to be field verified. The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan designates a trunk sanitarysewer line to go through this site. The applicant is proposing to extend the 27-inch line to the north and then serve the development with 8-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer. Two 8-inch diameter sanitary stubs are proposed to serve the proposed buildings. Comments: 1 AnnliGant to install 27_iRGh diameter sewer alGRg P.,semary Way. The f itywill cover the c66-fis Orthe sanitary Plan r or! 2. Applicant to add City Standard Detail SAN-4 for drop manholes. Detail included on Belland Farms final construction plans. Applicant to review if drop manholes are necessary. City staff recommends installing wyes to connect the services directly to the main lines. 3. Maanlrheies shall IGGated within a pipeline easemepr Plan revised 6. Applicant shall install sanitary sewer within the Rosemary Way alignment all the way to the westerly property line with this project. Trunk credit will be applied. 7. Applicant to revise the profile view pipe label for the stub out of MH 4. This pipe should be SDR 26. • Transportation Rosemary Way is proposed to be 32-ft wide from the back of curb to the back of curb. The entrances to the parking lots are proposed to be 24-ft wide from the back of curb to the back of curb. Rosemary Way used to access the site will be accessed from 24t" Avenue and will extend to either the north or south to eventually connect to Otter Lake Rd. 24t" Avenue is a local road that can handle the traffic from this development. It is a right in/right out at Main Street (CSAH 14). A specific Traffic Study was not completed for the proposed site. A Traffic Study is recommended for any future development of this area. Comments: 1. Applicant shall show the existing location of Rosemary Wayon the east side of 24AII-Aven4e, Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 5 7 II d+ hammerhead tur +u nnarr�e LJRd �. eat a„ -ad �he+tr<erear� GUI de A-+ +hoy oo+ and of RA-16 ry VVay Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (Kjolhaug) delineated the wetlands on site in June of 2021. There are five wetlands located onsite. Wetland 1 is a Type 3/2/1 shallow marsh, wet meadow, farmed seasonally flooded basin complex and is approximately 2.47 acres. Wetland 2 is a Type 3/6/2 shallow marsh, shrub-carr, wet meadow complex and is approximately 0.56 acres. Wetland 3 (0.74 acres), Wetland 4 (0.08 acres), and Wetland 5 (0.05 acres) are all Type 1 farmed seasonally flooded basins. As currently proposed, the project will permanently impact 0.7381 acres of Wetland 3 in the southeast corner of the site. The applicant is proposing to purchase wetland back credits. The project area is not located within the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP) and are not within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Kjolhaug prepared a Wetland Permit Application dated September 13, 2021. The application was submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources the same day and the Rice Creek Watershed District comments are due to the applicant on October 8, 2021 Comments: 1 Applicant to include 10 ft buffers a uRd Wetlands 1 -and- 2 Drainage aR l Utility easements o required ever the i.Vo+lon.d h� �fforo Easements added to plan • Landscaping Landscaping plans were provided as part of the AECP plan set. No landscaping is proposed for Lot 2 at this time. Comments: 1. Staff recommends adjusting landscaping so that no trees are planted over utility pipes. Plan revised. Staff has concerns about the locations of the Heritage Oak tree and the Sienna Glen Maple tree that are closest to the storm sewer pipes for the Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 6 pond. These are large trees and root systems. Please shift the trees farther from the storm pipes. • Floodplain There are no existing floodplains on Belland Farms. • Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are proposed within the site where there is proposed storm sewer and stormwater management facilities, proposed watermain, and proposed sanitary sewer. The applicant is proposing to include Drainage and Utility easements over all of Outlot A. The applicant is dedicating a 60-ft right-of-way for the construction of Rosemary Way. Comments: 1. Applicant shall submit a permit or written permission from company that owns the Pipeline Easement stating that they are clear to construct facilities within the easement. Applicant shall also provide proof of ownership over the future right-of-way. We are currently working with FHR on the pipeline easement encroachment agreement. The pipeline depths have been field measured with a vac truck and we are actively coordinating with FHR on the agreement. FHR has provided preliminary approval of the plan. 2. At the time of the final plat, applicant to provide a separate document recording atrail easement over the drainage and utility easement along 24th Avenue N. Noted. Easement description sketch included for your review. The proposed trail easement should be shown as a drainage and utility easement on the plats. Applicant to update plat documents. The trail easement shall be recorded as a separate document. 2— Resemary Way right of way shall be N—Ai.vid-e. DlaR revised. 00 Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. Noted. 00 Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. Developer seeking grading agreement. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City's Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement. The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. Please confirm if this is required. RCWD does not require it if stormwater pond is in City's programmatic agreement. The City requires a declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private facilities (see attached PDF for example of what is to be covered by the declaration). The pond on Outlot A, the storm sewer in Rosemary Way, and the culvert that crosses Rosemary Way are the only public facilities. Noted. We assume the pond outlet structure and piping will also be public facilities. Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 12/1 /2021 Page 7 That is correct — the outlet structure and piping will be public facilities. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit 6. Anoka County Right -of -Way Permit Noted. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. Comments By: Joe Radach Carlson McCain, Inc. 11 /8/21 Belland Farms & Associated Eye Care Partners Engineering Review 1 \ 0 0 0 \\ • 21.2 0 \ e I /I • \ - 1 ° 2.0 \ 920-- I / I / / / • I / e / I k Z24 00 I I I =I I tO e• 0 00 e= •• e m 0 I I I I I II III I I I I I $ 91916 DITCH 50P OUTLET = 916.1 100-YR HWL = 917.5 I I l i i i I I \ I I I \ I I I \ ROCK CONST. -- �- ENTRANCE-_�_--- 9.611 mI I I ° _ 0 \ 920 920 d ° I • d I \ �9 \ �----- \ \ U - - - 915------- STORMWA TER POND 10P 21.0 (15.0 P`\ I �O I NWL = 915.0 •i .I®� j \ \9 \ I \ \\ 20.6 \� I j 100-YR HWL = 917.9 912 I � I I► / � / • I I \ / \ \ 9 � \ \\ y \ 910 o I f e I \\ 9 9 RAIN GUARDIAN ��` \ 20.2 � \ 908 -I a° \ \ • � 1 121.9 � \ \ 9 TURRET \ \ � \ 906 d. rn 00 POND EOF / o I 21.4 / \ �o\ rn 1 I® 919.5 / I I WETLAND IMPACT a 20.5 (2,381 SF) 0 I \ \ \ •�\ 15.0 91>0 ® 1 ' 21. • 1 ^� 21.5 \ \ 914 1 P I �4915-------/ 101 I 9� 0 I \ 9 \ � O 916 I • I G \ •ol I �I 21.0 21.0 9 ? 1 \ I I 1 0 I e I I 1 \ \I 1 N9 /\, I \�^ 1g.7 0 I % 9.7 �, \ \, 19.4 •°WETLAND IMPACT \ 195 77 I � I \ (32,153 SF) \ 9 20.4 •i 4� 4 16.0 920 920 I • I 9 \ S 20.1 �`\ ` 20.1 a LOW AREA 20P 71 20. .0' • 0 0 °° I I2.3 21.6 21.6, �\ OUTLET 916.0 19.65 20.4 20.6 \ ��, "20.7° I 1 •_i L I 0 G II 100-YR I4WL = 91813 0j ° �. e I 922 \\ ` I % --- 20.6 1 1 0 x W ° '22.5 I 9 I 20.412.3 22.0 22.5 22.522.0IP � j \ rn II I•° ° I 22.0 922 922 \ 9 21.0 2 0 21.6 2110 - -- 21.0 0 20.6 ,-� 10 FT. WETLAND I �1 \ A21.01 y BUFFER ° 1 22.6 3 \ 22.3 °o / \ � rn I d I I•'I , d r ° I v, ti I d • CV 2.2% I rn o °• 1� T T 22.8 e' lo� 4 G 22.3 G 22.8 G 22.8 G 22.3 �- -�-� 1 ° e ®o e° 1 d TIP -OUT CURB N \ N 4 \ I co I 1 di \ I TIP -OUT CURB TW 921.0 �- e° I (TYP------) I \ I (TYP -- ) BW 920.0 TW 921 BW 918.0 1 I I 8 .o y I �I .l 00 1 \ I I 1 .6 I d° 18.0 I m /EOF� BERM MIN. 1 FT. 1 °° I d 4 I I I \ i PROPOSED BUILDING BW 928.0 1 I ai s1�2 PROPOSED BUILDING ABOVE DITCH �1 °• ° I I FFE - 922.5 DITCH 1P (TYP) I0! FFE = 923.0 a \ I \ I RETAINING I I OUTLET = 913.7 • I 1 Z \ I O �\ I 'Yoi WALL I �I 100-YR HWL = 915.8 0� t 1 \ �9 I `\ 2.2%I d e1 ICI I' I •� ` \ I I 9 �l \ �- I \ 1 a 0 1 1 0 \ ' A 1 i9171 SILT FENCE, TWO IleI` 1\ I I I I 1 ROWS ADJACENT WETLAND 2P TO WETLAND \ \ OUTLET = 919.5 ee/ I , \ 20.6 21 01 O G \ i ° 9v.1 I I 914*11 100-YR HWL = 919.5 \ I \` \ I �. 1 e RCPTOP 915.E ' • I II I I 21.61 TW 921. CPTo 918.0 1 °91 s / • TW 921.0 co BW 920.0 ' G21.8 \ I I WE1LpN0 //•° c\i� N� DRAINAGE & \ I I \ \ %/ �0• UTILITY 9 / W; 0• EASEMENT I I \ d 18. ° 0 0 I (TYP) I\ 9 \ \ G 21.8 % • I �tir I I \ 1 • C4 922 922 9 \ G 21.8 -__ 0,�0 1 -9v.91 I /e� 0;920 I , I\ 1-8 -2t 5 20.0 ®-2x -- � �y �0 I » J e0° / I -------- 920 ------ ------ - 17.9\ 9 922>��» d » \�- 918'- �° 0.5% 15- -4 �° 19.5 0.5% -9 0- » �2.5 - --�° -� -� - - \ X 22.5 - - - \ Ln e ° m 191 6 �e-----------920- - 9 - -- --� • - - - - - - o 922 u o ufo ° - - _ •m xql T/'�`� - - - - - - - o 924-9 ufo u _- o-------- -- ohu ° o�W�So 0 o 091�9.3 �� u l hu �' oh a o u ohu ohu ohu oh ohu ohu ohu �. - -hu ohu ohu ohu °u`#oC ----- - f-_-- \ u9 - - -u� ° ohd9 h4� ` .HP uc °huu uc nh c oll�a n uo 6ha�-� 9 hd ten, °^ 5•� 921-7 �� ohuW oh�W okA ohu -aYi[r ufo ufo ufo o ufo ufo ufo ufo-_ufcg_ ufo ufo ---- ° �-Y ug- u u 921.9 B\�.., --u9 u9 _-�9-- ug7r% a ohu }� __ u _ ufo--------------- -----� ----- ohu �� ufo _ -- u9 / �T ufo - u ug a u° x- x u ufo .ufo u#o=-7---------- u ---- uq --- u4 - u9 u u9 9 �-- -� _ _ ------------------- ---- ------------ _ �^ , �� ug 9 u-�22'ug u9 �- -- -- - - � - 921.9 - ----- - 9 u 9- - _ - - ug u 9 -- - 922.2 x- - - 921.6 0+ .7 -- -- _--- ---------- ---- --------- -- --- ---_ _�= _ -- -- - ------------x------------------- _ ---- ---- - ---- --- - ---- _ _ ----- ---�3 922.8 922.3 ---�---->>--- - - -------- ___----- - 202 o -�-- - >------3-------------------- _---------- DITCH 40P 7 --- _ -- - ---- ___ ---- ----3- ------------- ---- ---- - - --- - - - OUTLET = 917.9 - � 9 ------ -- ---- \ ________ - WETLAND EOF I 100-YR HWL = 919.0 9 0 919.5 I _-- E W: 917.64 -- ► MAIN STREET I INV S E W: 915.9 I N V S F�V:�-4 > �' i 3 INV E W: 91 I m \ INV- N : 916,00 ------- -__-, INV- N : 915.09__________ _�- = JJ LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - CURB LINE ----------- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L---------J CONCRETE WALK STORM SEWER «- T� SANITARY SEWER -<<- WATER MAIN UNDERGROUND GAS - u9 °9 - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ue ue UNDERGROUND CABLE UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ufo OVERHEAD UTILITY °hd WETLAND ---------- POWER POLE GUY WIRE CABLE PEDESTAL FIBER OPTIC BOX ❑F HYDRANT 10' CONTOUR -920 920 2' CONTOUR -918-- 918 SPOT ELEVATION (CURB ELEVATIONS 00.0 ---a X ARE TO GUTTER LINE) TOP OF CURB ELEV. T 44.3 GUTTER LINE ELEV. G 43.8 E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW Im 4M x el� 01� 000.0 SILT FENCE -0 0 0 0 0 e- ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE 11 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD). 3. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. GRADING NOTES 1. SILT FENCE AND EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND PAVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE SODDED, SEEDED OR LANDSCAPED. 4. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BEGIN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER GRADING COMPLETION. 5. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER SHALL HAVE MNDOT CATA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND SEED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. WETLAND IMPACTS 0 34,534 SF 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) BENCHMARKS 1. MNDOT STATION NAMED 0282 S. ELEVATION = 931.461 (NAVD 88) J a 0 Z o W Fe U L z Z i V Iw f Z W N W J 0 m J z oU Q C U O LU M Ln � N lui 01 Z w 01 co >40 M JW �i o X LL U f <o C Q coo LU = 14 M M (�P5 M LU Co Z ,a W a Z 0 ^O^'' W a� a� zLL 0 .V Z0 Z Z J J M 0 J O oo J 0 Ile r� V W W � z Ile 00 W Mo a�U) 0 > Ln CC Q z a14-5� Z N O M Ln Is W N Z3 CO LU tie REVISIONS 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS 2. 11/08/21 CITY COMMENTS DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 09/13/21 License #: 45889 6 of 10 Environmental Memo A K -. ._ E,3., To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: November 9t", 2021 Re: Environmental Comments/November 9th, 2021/Belland Farms -Associate Eye Care Partners The Environmental Board, at their September 29t" meeting, had the following recommendations for Belland Farms and Associate Eye Care Partners: Applicant comments from 11-08-21 in red. Environmental Coordinator comments from 11-09-21 in blue. • .22" and 8" ash will not require mitigation trees to be planted. The to number of replaGemeRt trees required O.S -94. This should be updated OR the Tree PreservatiOR P,", Plan revased-. Ok. /1 34 more shrubs will be required + meet epeR sp standards. �� zrr �r-wrrrv��r ca--ceT-rc" . `. r' ".. `. ai�srarr Plan reyasei! Ok. 0 Page 1 Ok. Ok. 7. Blanding's turtle flyer and factsheet shall be distributed to all contractors working on the site. Noted. Ok. 8. MnDOT type 3N or 4N bio-netting or natural netting erosion control blanket should be used where blanket is necessary for stabilization to minimize wildlife impacts. Noted. Ok. • Environmental has no further comments. 11/09/21. • Page 2 i i i -- --- ----z-- - 4 ===MAIN � STREET��_, 1 0 Page 3 I I I i l I 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET LOT AREAS: Total existing parcel area = 811,343 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 1 Total area = 76,538 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 2 Total area = 86,027 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 3 Total area = 60,164 sq. ft. Proposed Outlot A Total area = 19,590 sq. ft. Proposed Outlot B Total area = 485,559 sq. ft. Proposed dedicated 24th Avenue Total area = 40,754 sq. ft. Proposed Rosemary Way Total area = 42,711 sq. ft. BENCHMARK MNDOT BM: 0282 S DATUM:NAVD88 ELEVATION: 931.461 LEGEND W = LL W O zQp � 0V) �LLLU O O Z� U V F a N n 0 04 M 01- r- O� C, W=aQM 0=)p0 Log V1=HZw °Q �OZP0 �= LU paa_J I � 00 CO of r, Ll . > Z 1 M \ 1 1 IU,<> LL a --J O O W = r\ H L1_ L w 0 LU C I z 'Y, U AWN <'' X W a - 1 W I IL r1 W � M �h jai _ LL W L1_ 1 W a U Z W I ` L1J C Y 0 ! T- LU 0=H I <,1 -1- r\ L1 =o= I �ZCY 'T• I -1- r r. ._r I W -T- W e I ,,_ L=- W o U) X *� W ' Q r . M • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED �y O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 Ui A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL �+ A DENOTES SET PKNAIL I 3 DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL 147.00 - X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Li Z ^' > F DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXLn DENOTES GUY WIRE DENOTES HYDRANT I DENOTES POWER POLE - I IL . J I Z 1p,l 99 DENOTES SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTION NO. O ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER < ON I r Q � II.-L 1 •:1n DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN w E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE z co o U CBL I o LU Q W DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINE = p U FIBER —DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE z o o V) I 0aJ i GAS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE a �, Z ..................•.....••..... DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS o o > � 0 Z F » DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER J w FNDALUMM oHU DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY Q Y wog » -A DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS --- DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE II a 919.89 I _ _ DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE I I FND-TOR OUT -SPIKE HO — DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE II I lo. 17-119-22-14-0008 L DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL x: City of X ess: Unassigned OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) y6 V oo V DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: �•t�� i / � O 9 B L Oj IC K 1 sS919 O W 5 t I 0 F2 Qi I I / BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND REAR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. EST.1911 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 IGB (GENERAL BUSINESS) GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) PRELIMINARY PLAT F ■ O PROPERTY OWNER/DEV PIN No. 24-31-22-11-0010 PIN No. 24-31-22-11-0011 SITE ADDRESS Owner: CM PROPERTIES 14 LLC Owner: CM PROPERTIES 14 LLC R E H B E I N PROPERTIES 2373 MAIN STREET o Address: NA Address: NA c IBELLAND FARMS 7625 24TH AVENUE N. LINO LAKES, MN 55038 1 n 1 1 i -1- r - r- -1- i I 1 i r.� r r- i 1 r n r r 1 -1- 1 i I EST LINE OF THE EAST HALF _ H U G O M N 55038 I I H<- I f l H �' ir.�i\ I I I I I I I I I I I i NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST -- a C: I I I \ 1 1 V / I I \ I _ L- ,. i•""""•• / 1 1 / 1 I '•L...,••,\,/. ••••""•L _ 1 V L/ I \ L/ L/ I I I \/• •1"V""'•• QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 0 �4� ss II QU N : N z N 1218 5'� ........ 911.88 ID \ U�0 ... rn w i i f FND-REBAR Sd 217.14 D 68.8 "' 439.35 I i yV .. per: U �; I 827.85 �1 S o } O Sd = H •O moo: � OW o:.• � n 6`•.• S� \ / Zoo O Z WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY -\ 00 \, N 0'66 / SAO F / / >\ W U H KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL p / � dS / > cc 0 l 0 } �� ::� 3 a� / ' 0 / -WW1 T 1 I •�: a 60,164 S.F. `': � s 1 � L a 1 a L h• h°'/ (1.38 ACRES) o..................................... / \ a w I: 1 i� 0./ Ln I ocII�I;. ID'WWS' WETLAND 2 N"rvz'i�wmv Nv �m= CO -PROPOSED DRAINAGE �AND UTILITY EASEMENT -------- M 0 ?Fa0 5 IiL ItL aoo Z WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY Jp LU KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL m :I Q d � w 0 (0I / / N I LU _ � ��''•. `j`' "00 o �: I� � '� ° � / / • • d9 / / ''. I WETLAND 1 N O 1 ��---- o / — I �J i y.l 160.89 �s§.29-..—...-. _..._--------- Y 3 61 1-1 C . < ` a Q 0 :II�PROPOSED It 6 G co 0 LIAND Qz J nOGa ON° ... in ...........lc)> a // '__- r• F- H H � 1 ��M. - �, / / I� �I ZZ� 86 027 S.F. .I // �f'` 9r� ILU ��W W Q } V C (1.97 ACRES) WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY - In D 13 a 3 a OG Za // Sd // �� KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL N U. O Z 9 i.r ( �9. Sl ll \I J H ' W ° (� ' Ln M QIJTLOT 1 Z WUj I i N o0 w a= C .*ON PROPOSED Sd v- I N O } F 0 0 W DAYCARE 485, 559 S.F. ` - 3M I a Z WWZ��o,n / s / 11.15ACRES 2 8 �' i C' BUILDING / / S 3 � t>r O' :I �aM _ C ) 6° S2l 0 W :- a a N FFE-923.0 4 �ti' W a z I / Sd� WET Q r n I,Z., :• 1 I / e� d� / / / S7°00'41"W S2°25'47"E \ \....a�yj.............. �s rs\ ao :I d I I i _ 1 I s / / II• 9 Ln w•^ S `,� w 0 I i 0 D 'I I 3 8 / ''^^ / .CHI 06�✓/—��---`-�—�—------- / S �h Cn� c—i ,Pjvl �I V N _ X` /f� r SO'AtS00"E / / » � �» oo . M� x o �� w V /�C 'o PROPOSED DR NAGE / n o ♦ < AND UTILITY EA EMENT.-Y- - / / "�o WETLAND ` P g12g� 2 ,9i3„00 � \o �I p9, .W z o r o r O^ SAO N w nin / y / pg? /1 r ET LAND AS DELINEATED BY I: •.ter .... �.'� '. < W \ KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL f oo 0 / - / I :V Igo ° , �•. / WETLAND 3 I iI f / S, a/ y I �� x' « I I T w .................................... ............................... ' --=- - -- a 19 590 S.F. '3r I -: I ----- 67.6 - ~ ` I N J 0 r y v. 9I6 . v I a Z) a Z 0 '� 76 538 S. F:' (0.45 ACRES) �/ I Q o I rJ Q a UO a o (1.76 ACRES) n % co' _ WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY c 0 I 3 3 ^ KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL Wa p k N _ Y=LL"2 `PIEj _ u1 y o g0N0in0oo /' '' ��" V LU = L %0 In 00 PROPOSED Q4�Q OJ r4 ti I a04 4 = p MEDICAL—µ �O d 1CO I T� W a Z °�16 B EIL922 5 DING1 OQO��j~JC�O rn M — 4 i \• I 9 I 1 — o I 81.1 --' -----— -----156 -----— — — — — — — — — — — — — - I ° N =-PROPOSED TR— IL EASEMENT _ N wti c I WET— 298.35 \ 107 37 a, 1 � 13M :.......:............:........ 13M 1 ... 4L15, 7' ..................... V SO ° 04'38"W ...........'.'.'.'...... 916 ............. 918................................. .................... ........... BE4 _r; ie i 915.60 • ••.•••• . ........ RCPTOP y .......•p• spry 919.84 V .......1�CJ��.•L. W LJ Z 91;,.34 91 4. RCPTOP LAND USE DESIGNATION. 2040 Land use is Commercial. Existing zoning is GB - General Business. Setbacks: Building Parking From streets 30 (40*) 15 Rear yard 30 (5**) 10 Side yard 10 10 * From collector or arterial street ** Accessory building 24 ...........1.... 918.35 918 49 �.. �� ......�� ......................._ ----------� �� NOKA COUNTY / CITY LIMITS---------- IMITS L�- -------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: Parcel 7A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 21, except that part described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said East 1/2; thence East along the South line thereof 200 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said South line 180 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 208 feet; thence West parallel with the South line 180 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 208 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT Parcel Nos. 6 and 6A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. ELOPER -.................................................................................. W ..... ................... W 1 ............................ .. ............................................. EAST LINE Of THE: NORTHEAST NOTES QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 05/21/21, 06/14/21, and 06/24/21. �N - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under - Parcel ID Numbers: 24-31-22-11-0005 and 24-31-22-11-0004. my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. the laws of the State of Minnesota. This survey was prepared with the benefit of title work. Commitment for title insurance prepared by Land Title, Inc., as Issuing Agent for First American Title Insurance Company, Issuing Office File No. 638209, dated effective May 12, 2021 at 7:00 A.M., was used to supplement this survey. ASON E. D Wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental. Date: 11-05-2021 License No. 41578 - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270015 Panel No. 0370 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Underground utilities are shown per markings requested by E.G. Rud and Sons per Gopher State One Call Ticket No.'s 211744451 and 211744453. - Proposed improvements, ponding, and utilities provided by Carlson McCain. DRAWN BY: BCD JOB NO: 210639BT DATE: 09/09/21 CHECK BY: JER FIELD CREW: DT/CT 1 09-17-21 CITY COMMENTS BCD 2 11-05-21 CITY COMMENTS BCD 3 4 5 S:\RUD\CAD\21PROJ\210639BT\PRELIMINARY PLAT\210639BT - PRELIM.PLAT.DWG SHEET 3 I\\ -\ \\ . \\ SMH 5 27" SAN STUB I ii LEGEND RE 922.08 TEMPORARY IE 900.61 EXISTING PROPOSED \ \ IE 901.04-27" E,W PROPERTY LINE \ \ IE 910.16 8" S HYDRANT AT WATER \% \ (DROP MH) 8" SAN STUB ,C EASEMENT LINE - MAIN TERMINUS i `° 902.71 i i BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r 20 � \ SMH 4 � SMH 3 i 1 i i i \ �.---- -- -� \ '( RE 920.00 i 1 i i CONCRETE WALK \ RE 921.28 i �--° -�1 - � >� 8" WM STUB v IE 900.57-27" S \ IE 900.92-27 E,W � 1 i i i CURB LINE _ _ IE 900.57-27" N HAMMERHEAD \ _`� �- IE 902.05-8" N- -(IE ---------------------------------------- --- 1 � i i SANITARY SEWER --->--->- >- - IE 900.57-27 W TURNAROUND \ - � , � \ STORM SEWER - » » 1 SURMOUNTABLE 9 \ 9 \' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- �Yo _ \ I WATER MAIN ---- CURB THROUGH cn \ I L----a-- 9 J is ` UNDERGROUND GAS u9 ug TURNAROUND � � � � \ \ COMMERCIAL DRWY .rYo II-_ TEMPORARY / \ ENTRANCE (TYP) =I 102 I I � �___-___ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - Ue °e - HYDRANT AT WATER / 'RCS 9 12" P CL52 WM 12 DIP CL�52 WM 1 MAIN TERMINUS I1 I I I I I I I I I I '�v �11 UNDERGROUND CABLE -° °0 - (�� „\ M > of UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ufo 1 27" SAN STUB 4+00 27 PVC SAN SWR m 3+00 2+0o Z7" PVC SAN $WR 1+00 o 0 IE 901.11 �� ` > 0 m V v OVERHEAD UTILITY ohu 5%- \ \\^� �s ROSEMARY WAY 04_ o;l � POWER POLE o } s _ 8:1 TAPER -------- N I V =i GUY WIRE 0 1 \ \ 9 \ ROSEMARY WAY 101 v �11 1 z - : CABLE PEDESTAL L---�-.'- FIBER OPTIC BOX ❑F MONUMENT SIGN HYDRANT 6 A \ \ \ 5 FT. \ \ A _ A CONC. SITE DATA 9 CONC. \ \ ----- \ \--------------- WALK 7 �5 \ \ \ \ WALK \ \ Z �� \ 6 FT. CONC. WALK \ 1 LOT 1 �� AT BACK OF CURB \ ZONING: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS 7 / I CONSTRUCT THIS Z G \ \ \ R5 11��a�� ( \ a I X r PORTION OF DRIVEWAY \ ►`� 9 \ O cn o I _ FOR HAMMERHEAD \\` 9 � \ \ \\ \ 34 >�\\ \\ .� �. � j °i TOTAL AREA: 76,537 SF W 1 I TURN AROUND .� \ \ �� \ FUTURE v 'i 1r ' \ \ \\ \ .�� PARKING _j CL HARD SURFACE AREA: \ 8.5' BITUMINOUS c) ` \ �� TRAIL - BUILDING: 12,480 SF 16% i N BARRICADE END OF I I 8" SAN STUB \ \ \ ��'�\ \ SURMOUNTABLE o o1 TMENT: TOTAL: 47,812 SF 62% / IE 912.0 \` 9 \ �$ \ ` \ \\\1 STREET (TYP) \ N \ 3 \ � CURB AND GUTTER 1 STORMWATER PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 28,725 SF 38% a- / � B612 CONCRETE I 24 12 \ \\ \ 18 ��a \\ POND LOT 2 CURB & GUTTER ON I ao \ ' PRIVATE DRIVEWAY\�� 1 I \ \ \ \ Ik �� \ 9 � V AV A �. �� \ �/ � 11 ZONING: GB -GENERAL BUSINESS 8" WM STUB 1 TYP - _ i 103 =1 TOTAL AREA: 86,027 SF I - A NHARD SURFACE AREA: 01 1 BUILDING: 13,361 SF 15% I 9 TRASH ENCLOSURE PAVEMENT: 31,224 SF 36% TYP TOTAL: 44,585 SF 52% 1 I \ % 9 \ \\ \ \ �� 12 d PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 41,442 SF 48% A, I 24 ® \ SURMOUNTABLE 00 'I G I ® 24 (�URB AND GUTTER R30 9 LOT 3 9 \ 31 4 ° ZONING: GB -GENERAL BUSINESS h 3 �O, TYP R I 'i � I I ` \ I - I TOTAL AREA: 60,163 SF 9 I TYP W� `� \ .QS �� 9 ° z 1 v A � SURMOUNTABLE 1 y N Of \ \ 1 I TYP W SETBACK REQUIREMENTS CURB AND GUTTER 1 g g g g 9 V �SURMOONTABLE V 1 o�� m °II ��( �� BUILDING PARKING 1 TYP TYP URB A"D GUTTER 12 =i FROM STREETS 30 (40*) 15 ° \ REAR YARD 30 (5**) 10 I V I 1 ° L� \\ \ \1 n 13 a 3. =i F 1 SIDE YARD 10 10 9 1 8" WM STUB M U) _ _-- _______�\ TRASH ENCLOSURE I I ° ° a ° ° \G \ i \ 1 ° °� N za `� * FROM COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL STREET I ° \ I LO V) o CV ** ACCESSORY BUILDING _j CONCRETE \ \ 9 \ 1 \I 8 FT. CL o I PARKING SUMMARY WALK WALK B C B 1 \ CONCRETE _ i- I N } rn } N N 'i --- LOT 1 STANDARD SURFACE STALLS 71 J 1 \ \ \ I RETAINING HANDICAP SURFACE STALLS 3 PROPOSED DAYCARE \ I 1 8 FT. 8 WALL 30. //' FUTURE SURFACE STALLS 11 BUILDING Q \ 1 1 ONCRETE ° �/ TOTAL STALLS 85 I 1 1 0 \ I \ WALK PROPOSED MEDICAL ,I 10 o BUILDING SMHI 2 LOT 2 f I \ 1 \ _ li RE 915.00 STANDARD SURFACE STALLS 38 1 IE 900.17-27" S \ I 1 \ 1 IE 900.17-27" N HANDICAP SURFACE STALLS 2 5.8 \ IE _ 6 133.5 °6° 6�.4 9 1 1 2 ` 18i'�24�f1 8 7 14 8 100 33. I i (DROP MH)6" W TOTAL STALLS 40 6 FT. 4 \ / a CON WALK ETE\ 1 \ N SIGN SCHEDULE PER MMUTCD STUB �A STOP SIGN: R1 1 (24"x 24") 6" SAN STUB ��--> IE 909.75 I 1 © HANDICAP PARKING SIGN: R7-8m W/R7-8b (12"x 18") o i ©NO PARKING SIGN: R8-3a (1"x 2 18") I I I N CONNECT TO EX. 8" DIP I WM W/8" 45- BEND & O G r o 1 1 \o ° p-- `J 8.5' BITUMINOUS �/ 8' G.V. & BOX & A \ B \ 8" X 12" INCREASER DRAINAGE & TRAIL ° I I 1 (FIELD VERIFY) / UTILITY EASEMENT C I 8 m 0e / (TYP) 9 cft �- �/ - - - - - _ _ Z V oe ue CT/W SMH 1 >> - RE 919.50 / I L----------------------------------- J \ » I a / PR. IE 900.108 FT.-27" N » ° �° \�» » \t \ CONCRETE `� CONSTRUCTEX. IE MH2OVER 0 15 30 60 � - _ N _ - \ WALK EX. STUB & CONNECT -�� - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - FEE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o - - - - - - _ -- ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu �o ° � - - '.�Y _ - - - - _ - - fo fo ufo ufo ufo ufo B ° o� �"9�' 1 1 j - - - , h,6o �pq r- s ufo ufo u9 0 _ _ uq g °h 1 ohHg ohu h ufo _ md. ---- i u u9 ohu ohu ohu ohu ohu �j ohu -----------i-__--_ ug Va �� --_ o u ---------ufo- ufo ufo ufo --ufo --_ufo_- ufo-- ufo --ufo--------------- - ----- _ - _ Ww �� o 919 - �� .... ug u9 f- ug h� ohm 0 ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo ufo - - u _ _ - BENCHMARKS - --- ufo ------ ug u9 u9 °�� °° " �� ---- ---- --- uy ��- �i -LQ� ----- ug - ---------- ug ug u9 - �� - - - - - - _- - ------------------ ug �-_-u //' u --- -- u -- ug ----9-------- _ u ��------------ 9� - - / �\�L 9----------------�- -- rn _ _ _- ------ I-- - -- -- - -------- -- -- - - ----- --- -- - ____________ - -- _ _ - - __ - _ - MNDOT STATION NAMED 0282 S. -- r}--_---_>--- _------- - - ----- _ ---- ---------------------------------------------- _----------------------- PROPOSED TRAIL -- _--��__! ---- 9 9 i EASEMENT �>-- ��- ELEVATION = 931.461 (NAND 88) _-- I MAIN STREET --- �Nv s E W: 915.9 \ E W: 917.64 -- INN S E W: 914.65 n I N V E W- 91 � 51 9 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG -- ^ ---------_________________ I ------------------- \___=i=__--------- IN V- N: 916,00 ---------- NV Know v J Q Z W 0 U W ZQ Z Z Z W ix f U f W Z W Nl W Q O J m Z OQ O V O Z H Ln N3 W n Z W > O � ocV oto M a v; W o X LL �o U x <o Q w co = a M MLu H Z J �J a O C J LL aV Z� 0� j W c W � m J F�1 W z N 00 W 5 o a�Ln 0 > U) GC Q z a14-3� Z N O FBI Ln 0) LV N Z3 ca LU REVISIONS 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS 2. 11/08/21 CITY COMMENTS DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 09/13/21 License #: 45889 5 of 10 1 \ 0 0 0 \\ • 21.2 0 \ e I /I • \ - 1 ° 2.0 \ 920-- I / I / / / • I / e / I k Z24 00 I I I =I I tO e• 0 00 e= •• e m 0 I I I I I II III I I I I I $ 91916 DITCH 50P OUTLET = 916.1 100-YR HWL = 917.5 I I l i i i I I \ I I I \ I I I \ ROCK CONST. -- �- ENTRANCE-_�_--- 9.611 mI I I ° _ 0 \ 920 920 d ° I • d I \ �9 \ �----- \ \ U - - - 915------- STORMWA TER POND 10P 21.0 (15.0 P`\ I �O I NWL = 915.0 •i .I®� j \ \9 \ I \ \\ 20.6 \� I j 100-YR HWL = 917.9 912 I � I I► / � / • I I \ / \ \ 9 � \ \\ y \ 910 o I f e I \\ 9 9 RAIN GUARDIAN ��` \ 20.2 � \ 908 -I a° \ \ • � 1 121.9 � \ \ 9 TURRET \ \ � \ 906 d. rn 00 POND EOF / o I 21.4 / \ �o\ rn 1 I® 919.5 / I I WETLAND IMPACT a 20.5 (2,381 SF) 0 I \ \ \ •�\ 15.0 91>0 ® 1 ' 21. • 1 ^� 21.5 \ \ 914 1 P I �4915-------/ 101 I 9� 0 I \ 9 \ � O 916 I • I G \ •ol I �I 21.0 21.0 9 ? 1 \ I I 1 0 I e I I 1 \ \I 1 N9 /\, I \�^ 1g.7 0 I % 9.7 �, \ \, 19.4 •°WETLAND IMPACT \ 195 77 I � I \ (32,153 SF) \ 9 20.4 •i 4� 4 16.0 920 920 I • I 9 \ S 20.1 �`\ ` 20.1 a LOW AREA 20P 71 20. .0' • 0 0 °° I I2.3 21.6 21.6, �\ OUTLET 916.0 19.65 20.4 20.6 \ ��, "20.7° I 1 •_i L I 0 G II 100-YR I4WL = 91813 0j ° �. e I 922 \\ ` I % --- 20.6 1 1 0 x W ° '22.5 I 9 I 20.412.3 22.0 22.5 22.522.0IP � j \ rn II I•° ° I 22.0 922 922 \ 9 21.0 2 0 21.6 2110 - -- 21.0 0 20.6 ,-� 10 FT. WETLAND I �1 \ A21.01 y BUFFER ° 1 22.6 3 \ 22.3 °o / \ � rn I d I I•'I , d r ° I v, ti I d • CV 2.2% I rn o °• 1� T T 22.8 e' lo� 4 G 22.3 G 22.8 G 22.8 G 22.3 �- -�-� 1 ° e ®o e° 1 d TIP -OUT CURB N \ N 4 \ I co I 1 di \ I TIP -OUT CURB TW 921.0 �- e° I (TYP------) I \ I (TYP -- ) BW 920.0 TW 921 BW 918.0 1 I I 8 .o y I �I .l 00 1 \ I I 1 .6 I d° 18.0 I m /EOF� BERM MIN. 1 FT. 1 °° I d 4 I I I \ i PROPOSED BUILDING BW 928.0 1 I ai s1�2 PROPOSED BUILDING ABOVE DITCH �1 °• ° I I FFE - 922.5 DITCH 1P (TYP) I0! FFE = 923.0 a \ I \ I RETAINING I I OUTLET = 913.7 • I 1 Z \ I O �\ I 'Yoi WALL I �I 100-YR HWL = 915.8 0� t 1 \ �9 I `\ 2.2%I d e1 ICI I' I •� ` \ I I 9 �l \ �- I \ 1 a 0 1 1 0 \ ' A 1 i9171 SILT FENCE, TWO IleI` 1\ I I I I 1 ROWS ADJACENT WETLAND 2P TO WETLAND \ \ OUTLET = 919.5 ee/ I , \ 20.6 21 01 O G \ i ° 9v.1 I I 914*11 100-YR HWL = 919.5 \ I \` \ I �. 1 e RCPTOP 915.E ' • I II I I 21.61 TW 921. CPTo 918.0 1 °91 s / • TW 921.0 co BW 920.0 ' G21.8 \ I I WE1LpN0 //•° c\i� N� DRAINAGE & \ I I \ \ %/ �0• UTILITY 9 / W; 0• EASEMENT I I \ d 18. ° 0 0 I (TYP) I\ 9 \ \ G 21.8 % • I �tir I I \ 1 • C4 922 922 9 \ G 21.8 -__ 0,�0 1 -9v.91 I /e� 0;920 I , I\ 1-8 -2t 5 20.0 ®-2x -- � �y �0 I » J e0° / I -------- 920 ------ ------ - 17.9\ 9 922>��» d » \�- 918'- �° 0.5% 15- -4 �° 19.5 0.5% -9 0- » �2.5 - --�° -� -� - - \ X 22.5 - - - \ Ln e ° m 191 6 �e-----------920- - 9 - -- --� • - - - - - - o 922 u o ufo ° - - _ •m xql T/'�`� - - - - - - - o 924-9 ufo u _- o-------- -- ohu ° o�W�So 0 o 091�9.3 �� u l hu �' oh a o u ohu ohu ohu oh ohu ohu ohu �. - -hu ohu ohu ohu °u`#oC ----- - f-_-- \ u9 - - -u� ° ohd9 h4� ` .HP uc °huu uc nh c oll�a n uo 6ha�-� 9 hd ten, °^ 5•� 921-7 �� ohuW oh�W okA ohu -aYi[r ufo ufo ufo o ufo ufo ufo ufo-_ufcg_ ufo ufo ---- ° �-Y ug- u u 921.9 B\�.., --u9 u9 _-�9-- ug7r% a ohu }� __ u _ ufo--------------- -----� ----- ohu �� ufo _ -- u9 / �T ufo - u ug a u° x- x u ufo .ufo u#o=-7---------- u ---- uq --- u4 - u9 u u9 9 �-- -� _ _ ------------------- ---- ------------ _ �^ , �� ug 9 u-�22'ug u9 �- -- -- - - � - 921.9 - ----- - 9 u 9- - _ - - ug u 9 -- - 922.2 x- - - 921.6 0+ .7 -- -- _--- ---------- ---- --------- -- --- ---_ _�= _ -- -- - ------------x------------------- _ ---- ---- - ---- --- - ---- _ _ ----- ---�3 922.8 922.3 ---�---->>--- - - -------- ___----- - 202 o -�-- - >------3-------------------- _---------- DITCH 40P 7 --- _ -- - ---- ___ ---- ----3- ------------- ---- ---- - - --- - - - OUTLET = 917.9 - � 9 ------ -- ---- \ ________ - WETLAND EOF I 100-YR HWL = 919.0 9 0 919.5 I _-- E W: 917.64 -- ► MAIN STREET I INV S E W: 915.9 I N V S F�V:�-4 > �' i 3 INV E W: 91 I m \ INV- N : 916,00 ------- -__-, INV- N : 915.09__________ _�- = JJ LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - CURB LINE ----------- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L---------J CONCRETE WALK STORM SEWER «- T� SANITARY SEWER -<<- WATER MAIN UNDERGROUND GAS - u9 °9 - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ue ue UNDERGROUND CABLE UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ufo OVERHEAD UTILITY °hd WETLAND ---------- POWER POLE GUY WIRE CABLE PEDESTAL FIBER OPTIC BOX ❑F HYDRANT 10' CONTOUR -920 920 2' CONTOUR -918-- 918 SPOT ELEVATION (CURB ELEVATIONS 00.0 ---a X ARE TO GUTTER LINE) TOP OF CURB ELEV. T 44.3 GUTTER LINE ELEV. G 43.8 E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW Im 4M x el� 01� 000.0 SILT FENCE -0 0 0 0 0 e- ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE 11 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD). 3. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. GRADING NOTES 1. SILT FENCE AND EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND PAVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE SODDED, SEEDED OR LANDSCAPED. 4. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BEGIN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER GRADING COMPLETION. 5. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER SHALL HAVE MNDOT CATA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND SEED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. WETLAND IMPACTS 0 34,534 SF 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) BENCHMARKS 1. MNDOT STATION NAMED 0282 S. ELEVATION = 931.461 (NAVD 88) J a 0 Z o W Fe U L z Z i V Iw f Z W N W J 0 m J z oU Q C U O LU M Ln � N lui 01 Z w 01 co >40 M JW �i o X LL U f <o C Q coo LU = 14 M M (�P5 M LU Co Z ,a W a Z 0 ^O^'' W a� a� zLL 0 .V Z0 Z Z J J M 0 J O oo J 0 Ile r� V W W � z Ile 00 W Mo a�U) 0 > Ln CC Q z a14-5� Z N O M Ln Is W N Z3 CO LU tie REVISIONS 1. 09/17/21 CITY COMMENTS 2. 11/08/21 CITY COMMENTS DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 09/13/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 09/13/21 License #: 45889 6 of 10 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET LOT AREAS: Total existing parcel area = 811,353 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 1 Total area = 76,808 sq. ft. Impervious surface area = 45,556 sq. ft. (59% Proposed Lot 2 Total area = 86,899 sq. ft. Impervious surface area = 44,825 sq. ft. (52% Proposed Outlot A Total area = 20,223 sq. ft. Proposed Outlot B Total area = 558,948 sq. ft. Upland area = 419,785 sq. ft. (excluding wetland) Proposed dedicated 24th Avenue Total area = 40,754 sq. ft. Proposed street Total area = 27,721 sq. ft. BENCHMARK MNDOT BM: 0282 S DATUM:NAVD88 ELEVATION: 931.461 LEGEND W U. W 0 �LLWF a. -I O O U V a N c�il�oo Wxp,aM Cc)o��o U w = } = F � UrJmI- omoo W W0" V1x�zw �a>W xLL0=W °Q 0 Z P 0 I= LU a a _j I A / 00 CO wi r � u i > z ___--Z----.147.00 - - r-- \ N I \ U, Z I a ~ LL I O LU o x i L1_ a LL W I a x 0 LU N X `'� W , `W I LL M o -I' x LL W L1_ ow IZ Z) W 1 J O' LL x H O F -T- 0=H I \r� =o= I FZCY - I -T- _1_ . r. W -T- W o I '--- W o X W ._. Z Qz ,. M I • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED �y DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 N A DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL �+ A DENOTES SET PKNAIL I 3 DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL 147.00 X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION ^' > 9 LirZr F DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXLn DENOTES GUY WIRE I :3 � DENOTES HYDRANT 'W DENOTES POWER POLE I z 99 DENOTES SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTION NO. O ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN z mU_ > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I a O Ln DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN w U E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE z m W w I o W cBL Q U DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINE 0 o U X Ic 3 FIBER DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE z o o I �aLd cas DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE aLd z DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS o o > JC9z Z F » DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER >.w FNDALUM oHu DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY Q Y - - DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE I -- -L I I DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE III T DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE I V lo. 17-119-22-14-0008 1 DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL r: City of X L ess: Unassigned OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) ` 6 L o V DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: �.t�� L S�J / � O B L OI IC K 1 �tis9� 0 5-t o F2 I I / BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND REAR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. EST.1911 Professional Land Surveyors WWW.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 C GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) PIN No. 24-31-22-11-0010 Owner: CM PROPERTIES 14 LLC Address: NA GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) PRELIMINARY PLAT O F : PIN No. 24-31-22-11-0011 PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPER SITE ADDRESS Owner.CM AAddess:NARDPERTIESI4LLC REHBEIN PROPERTIES 2373 MAIN STREET 1 0 c IOtLLANU tRUM5 7625 24TH AVENUE N. LINO LAKES, MN 55038 i -i- r - r- -i- i i i-- r.� r r- i i t n r r i -i- i♦ i WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF HUG O' MN 55038 _ I \/ I i\ I I I I F< F- I f I I H >'*.:. F- / I\ I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I i NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST - N �N - \ V . i i i \ I - L - ,.i•.......... / i i .. i i '•L.,,...�.i.........c _ i v i I - \ L i L ' I•...'. �,�...,..y....... .• QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 N... ............... 91 \ m 1.88 Sd ...... 910.70 f N0Q00'44"W i218.57 FND-REBAR •.' 9 d9 FND REBAR-40361 \ J / OZ� 0 / Sd/ // w � U v0 O / It- ` a J O WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY _ oil / �ir� sd� / !�2 Y a off+ KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL y ' / / / / W OLU a a p / d�� o LL (n :' S AIL AIL L ILL, a C N WET LAND AS.DELINEATED Bl(.•'' / / ;:' SdJ� KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL / 0� Coo WETLAND 2 m / s / m l i r .. J�/ z fn I a c9 N �/ w ` do Sd� } I 1 Z LU :'� / S vi x " fl� WETLAND 5 / %. Sd� // / / a o a m J11I ate$ o I I x ., �`� sd9 WETLAND 1\ «� s .N0000'0'00`'E 462.09cL szo 3 .61-----------N0(PG0'00"E-402:09- 60.00 �' f�P 0.�d l �Uj ^ N Oc / / c, _ ...................... s / 0 o�....... d9 C, S/-- _ _ \ LOT 2 Quo PGA �� / Sd 9 / / ' :I \ 86,899 S.F. °� a a N......... (1.99 ACRES) I I I I / / •��•��' t0 Sd9 / / / .O o ~ W �/ l WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY :'Z Z N iI o a 3 a OO a :` / / Sd / ..I d -/ / / �� KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL `� x 2 I N as ., oW rn Y 3 M O / // I / ' , 1 Z x o ^ PROPOSED Sd / :I Z o c I �`� o O� W } H O in CO DAYCARE / / �y� sd� W oc LU E I w W z O Z .-I ,� BUILDING / / / I N W aa0� JCN FFE=923.0 // sd� // ♦1♦�^ 13h1 II xaQ W a Z I / WE 1 13M 01 Sd0 / / T OUTLOT B ► A �� - - -� - --� ----- 94. o---------------- / / 558, 948 S.F. `,� oz / / J 912..................................................... w ✓ sd (12.83•.ACRES) Co • S i / O' _ 1 i / 1 ♦ ^ I i 9 O h 00 140 d I Y•oll i S p Wj ♦�` r --'�°Q@'26� ---/ -----/ O W cL00 ID M PROPOSED DRAINAGE y� AND UTILITY EASEMENT-----`-_� .��'L ��, Z WETLAND41 9 S p / \ 1� i F 9 i WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY _ °♦�^` KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL •`� is c1 tii. / 1 / � I _ � ♦ i WETLAND 3 --- I ........... y ...............-----.-t--------87.7- i OUTLOT A it I i�^ ............. _ ------- L----- 67.6- } a LOT 1 20,223 S.F. N z o (0.46 ACRES) W W p a Z p 76, 808 S. F...' m o o } } z 0 (1.76 ACRES) / c,`� c'T y cb IDo N Uaa0ao z�P� ; 74 .. °� I n LU O O In c PROPOSED 1 •4 �Q��CQ�`G �_ N I 00 WZxF%Din00 MEDICAL Z (/1 a . o+ Ch C a x 0 ,-I .-I 16' BUILDING Q \ \ W LU ►Oi Z •°� FFE=922.5 13M ,Q PLO y' v' I� - - - - - - - - eFx M' PROPOSED DRAINAGE K!ET AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 M 1 ,i �4V1 T = Q WET- 6-ITT�I 110.37 y r -7 w - -13M--13M:::-13N13FI€€R M7 lam ............... •FIB€'R -- ..._ -� a �... .: ........................ . ....................................................................... 915.60 r .9 - - -I - 0-.. RCPTOP 919.84 FNDIP 914.11 RCPTOP LAND USE DESIGNATION 2040 Land use is Commercial. ZONING: Existing zoning is GB - General Business. Setbacks: Building Parking From streets 30 (40*) 15 Rear yard 30 (5**) 10 Side yard 10 10 * From collector or arterial street ** Accessory building WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL C6 rn 0 M --t-7-- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 25 ...................918 ..I................. ................ RFC -FnEE: 16 ................................................................................... . ........................................................................................ A4�•� c rIEEG FIDE- �, ........__. f 2�............ ...................F.. -........ .....��............. ., .....:;. V P�'Ir - 'r.N... hBER 9- F1BFR F F S0004'38 "W 1238.27 Z. 1-t 1 r-7 f--'\ V I_ I V 4 JI I 18.35 Z917.34 /1 �9�918a9 - - - - - - - - - - - ANOKA COUNTY / CITY LIMITS NOTES - - - - - - - - - - � - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 05/21/21, 06/14/21, and 06/24/21. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Parcel ID Numbers: 24-31-22-11-0005 and 24-31-22-11-0004. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared with the benefit of title work. Commitment for title insurance prepared by Land Title, Inc., as Issuing Agent for First American Title Insurance Company, Issuing Office File No. 638209, dated effective May 12, 2021 at 7:00 A.M., was used to supplement this survey. - Wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental. - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270015 Panel No. 0370 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Underground utilities are shown per markings requested by E.G. Rud and Sons per Gopher State One Call Ticket No.'s 211744451 and 211744453. - Proposed improvements, ponding, and utilities provided by Carlson McCain. g 921.93 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Parcel 1• rnE Parcel 7A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 21, except that part described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said East 1/2; thence East along the South line thereof 200 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said South line 180 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 208 feet; thence West parallel with the South line 180 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 208 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT Parcel Nos. 6 and 6A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. w I 1 / / EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ASON E. D Date: 09-17-2021 License No. 41578 DRAWN BY: BCD JOB NO: 210639BT DATE: 09/09/21 CHECK BY: JER FIELD CREW: DT/CT 1 09-17-21 CITY COMMENTS BCD 2 3 4 5 :■ S:\RUD\CAD\21PROJ\210639BT\PRELIMINARY PLAT\210639BT - PRELIM.PLAT.DWG SHEET 3 Q N N Lf1 0 +1 ro N O N g00 L a a� J Q N Z U_ Z 0 � m C7 -0, 2 n a C O O rl O ��Q ,� J o O a I'>az W U m Z ED 0 Ql 12� I'D 5�' co � N � LU z lii .. W V) l__ < . U J J J _j LL LL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASI 15 ---------- CD _1 =MENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I 5 L— — — — — — — — — O BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES. EAST If CORNER OF SEC. 24-T.31-R.24 FOR THE PURPO OF THE NORTHE IS ASSUMED TO DEGREES 04 MI MIN ' City of lino lakes LL IBELLAND FARMS w County of Anoka I o��o,N I 0OLU Section 24, T31, R24 N�� IL" < C I 0< W 0 L A A I A I / -I- r\ r- r- -I- / I I/♦ r 1 r,,,r- / /\ A I r A r r\ I -I- I /♦ n I O W= Z W I\/I /_\ I I\I wwoCwLf) 2 2 0 2 W WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF NORTHEAST QUARTER - FOUND N0000'44 "W FOUND REBAR OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 �\ -,' PK NAIL _ 1218.57 RLS NO. 40361 1 / / 262.45 JI -- �-- EASEMENT 6PE-1 PER ANOKA COUNTY Z: LF,- HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 65 w Q (DOC. NO. 1958835 AND 1980487.001) / v� ---SURVEY LINE J I< 0 �Z� CD�i� n I all, W N O I d N , , ; ; _; ^ WETLAND w w M w /. �• ,�Vo�4 III, � / 2 N0~- no O 4 I W/Evv�N TAND0v / 9 L1w Q Uw 00 Se 1 � z / 0 WETLAND a w Z 60 30.61 \� °300 NO0000E Ln T385.20 o$Luper0' -------------------------- XW — --, \- DRAINAGE AND v+N 66 UTILITY EASEMENT W 208.00 'NO°00'44" -Cq oo 1z zaoO�-T- o O �Iw � 00 QLu Q - LO 2aFll, �\ °. i% I LnLU Ln -- --co Ln �I =U u / Q C9 0 L1_ I z Q / W=\ � / / / / � I LU — 6 NO°00'44"W 208.00 I W / /�� / / / / / / ; R C ! Ali, I % 1_ - � - 27. 34 / / / / / / yb y1 o+ OCT I ' I 1 ---- � --�---,- L-- o — �— — — �X I SO 00'00"E 260.46 / " � L1J FOUND 1/2" / I �'� / / V J 3 •.�.c�\ 1 I �i; IRON PIPE / I / / / / 3 �o ` WETLAND , \ Q LU d p w < , LL O t0 a =Q� I '-- fo 0'16 MO Z ��^1 Z�N w oa I a �I —� 5� al., z 441 =w1U ai N 'I OUnOI A �,9�� 1 r'� ` z Z O < `I / Ica ' K . Z - Cp "� I "' I W J = o I DRAINAGE AND \ _ I yU ;-� wry _ \1� ^O UTILITY EASEMENT 0 U ��' "'��11 �D �� 1 Z II ��, O THROUGHOUT LU L 1` 0 M I 1 Ln OUTLOT A , t^, Z W /v V � /� Z III, p ►'/-, O Lu EASEMENT 6PE-2 PER ANOKA COUNTY L N ' a Q 0 H I z I HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 65 �/ y I - (DOC. NO. 1958835 AND 1980487.001) _ 11;N27°39'58"E WETLAND � - 7-34.91 `x !I�\ \�� \ _ S3 81 '29"W S0°04'38"W 66 4 i-- 13 131.72 1 \\ WET N ----- y ' I -WET--_ WET N SO760.1 "W I 298.35 N 107.37 760.15 i 1 405.71 I � 33.50 .50 M NO°04'38"E 24TH AVENUE M \ �> 33.50 L \ N0004'38"E 1402.87 -� FOUND IRON PIPE O �� / -1- 1 1 A \/ r -1 I I r- 'k M F1 I\I I I F- L_ -* 1 I I /-\ r L_ 1 r / c SES OF THIS PLAT THE EAST LINE AST QUARTER OF SEC. 24-T.31-R.24 HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 \ Lid 38 SECONDS WEST. / /L- Lys LEGEND. i z1-� DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE, SET AND MARKED RLS NO. 41578 DENOTES FOUND PKNAIL DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY. DENOTES WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL IN MAY, 2021. 60 0 30 60 120 240 (SCALE IN FEET) 1 inch = 60 feet E�197 Professional Land Surveyors I 1\ -I- 1\ ► 1 1I'll:1 � 1 1 11\1 r r / \ ./ 1 I 1I l l v ♦/ I ♦/ I V KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, owner of the following described property: Parcel 7A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The East 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 21, except that part described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said East 1/2; thence East along the South line thereof 200 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said South line 180 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said East 1/2 208 feet; thence West parallel with the South line 180 feet; thence South parallel with said West line 208 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT Parcel Nos. 6 and 6A, Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BELLAND FARMS and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as shown by this plat. Also dedicated to the County of Anoka the right of access onto County Road No. 14 as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20. REHBEIN PROPERTIES Gerald L. Rehbein, Partner 1238.27 S0004'38 "W 60 I I I I I I\1 T111 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by Gerald L. Rehbein, its partner of Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, on behalf of the partnership. (signature) (print name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires r- I ► A /\ r\ r- A \ / r- L 1 1 1 r- L 1 /. r\ -1- 1 1 F( F- `� I /_\ \/ I-- I\I I I I-- I\I I I F( I f� L_ L_ 1 I \/ I\ L_ �/ I / \ r L_ 1 r 11 L_ I r \/ I\ I I I STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF 20 This instrument was acknowledged before me this by Jason E. Rud. I Jason E. Rud do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Jason E. Rud, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 41578 cW IFOUND IRON PIPE RLS NO. 17765 c THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST rrj --- QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF O I THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC.24-T.31-R.24 M COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER I Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 _ on the day of 20 land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of 20 (signature) (print name) Property Tax Administrator Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of BELLADD FARMS was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20_, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By , as Mayor By as City Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 David M. Zieglmeier Anoka County Surveyor By Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of BELLADN FARMS was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock M. and was duly recorded as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By. Deputy