Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/12/2022 P&Z Combined PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. A C 11 1V11 A 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 8, 2021 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. NorthPointe Bch Addition Final Plat and NorthPointe Garden Estates Site & Building Plan Review, Katie Larsen B. Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat, Katie Larsen C. Robinson Property PUD Concept Plan Review, Katie Larsen 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Zoning Ordinance Update -Definitions and Administration, Kendra Lindahl, Landform B. Project Updates 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: oo Please address the meeting chair. oo State your name and address for the record. oo Please observe a 4-minute limit. oo The topic must relate to city business. oo Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. oo A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. oo The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. oo Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: oo The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. oo Staff will present their report on the proposal. oo Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. oo The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. oo After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. oo The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. oo The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE: December 8, 2021 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 7:22 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Tralle (Chair), Neil Evenson, Perry Laden, Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech, Jeff Reinert, Michael Root STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Janele Waterman, Jessica Eller I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on December 8, 2021. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I& � III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Laden made a MOTION to approve the November 10, 2021 meeting minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 5 — 0. Chair Tralle and Mr. Root abstained. V. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:33 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:33 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Vojtech. Motion carried 6 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. VI. ACTION ITEMS A. MTO Properties-Thrivent Financial Final Plat and Site & Building Plan Review DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 2 Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicant, MTO Properties, submitted a land use application for a final plat on a 1 acre lot in order to construct a 2,873 sq. ft. commercial office building for Thrivent Financial. Staff recommended approval of the final plat and site & building plan review for MTO Properties Addition and Thrivent Financial subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Board Comments Mr. Laden asked if Ms. Larsen received a lighting plan from the applicant. Ms. Larsen said a lighting plan was submitted, reviewed by staff, and all the requirements were met. She stated the lighting is down lit and the majority of the lighting would be on the building's exterior. She also recalled there are two parking lights proposed in the parking lot. Mr. Laden asked if Ms. Larsen recalled the height of the light poles. Ms. Larsen said she did not remember the height of the light poles. Mr. Laden stated he was concerned about how lit the parking lot will be as the site will be immediately adjacent to a residential home. Mr. Root commented Hodgson Road is quite busy in the morning and afternoon hours and it may be difficult for individuals to turn left onto Hodgson Road from Blue Heron Drive during peak hours. He asked if staff had any traffic concerns for customers visiting the site and for the residents on Blue Heron Drive. Ms. Larsen stated, although traffic will be increased, it is not uncommon for current residents to take a left turn from Blue Heron Drive onto Hodgson Road. Applicant's Comments Scott Mower, 4920 Otter Lake Road, White Bear Lake, MN 55110, with Progressive Architecture, said the light poles in the parking lot will be 20 ft. to 25 ft. high. With regard to accessing Hodgson Road, he commented Blue Heron Drive will be safer than implementing an alternative access road. Public Comments Susan Drabek, 6684 Sandhill Drive, expressed concern that a traffic study was not conducted. She stated traffic on Hodgson Road has increased significantly since the 1985 plat due in part to the construction of the new middle and elementary schools DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 3 and the increased student population at the high school. She commented it is exceedingly dangerous for motorists to turn left from Blue Heron Drive onto Hodgson Road given the 50 mph speed limit. Ms. Drabek cautioned if thirty customers visit the site each day, traffic will increase dramatically and it may cause issues. Board Comments Chair Tralle stated since visitors will come to the site at various times throughout the day, traffic will not be significantly impacted. Mr. Laden asked how staff determines when a traffic study is needed and when it is not. Ms. Larsen said each project is evaluated to determine if a traffic study is needed. In this case, she explained since the site will have eight employees and traffic will be staggered throughout the day, a traffic study is not warranted. Ms. Larsen noted adding an access onto Hodgson Road will not be allowed. Mr. Laden said in comparison to other commercial sites, the anticipated traffic volume for this site will be insignificant. He asked if determining whether a traffic study is necessary or not is subjective to staff. Ms. Larsen stated since there is not a threshold to determine whether a traffic study is required or not, it is subjective to staff s discretion. Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to recommend approval of the final plat and site & building plan review for MTO Properties Addition and Thrivent Financial subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Board Discussion Mr. Reinert commented although Hodgson Road is a county road, the City has jurisdiction to reassign the speed limit if they want to. Motion carried 6 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. B. PUBLIC HEARING: Precision Tune Auto Care Conditional Use Permit Ms. Eller, Community Development Intern, presented the staff report. The applicant, Precision Tune Auto Care, is currently located at 550 Lilac Street. The applicant is proposing to relocate their business to 7910 Lake Drive and construct a new 4,125 sq. ft. facility on the 0.7 acre parcel. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 4 Staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit and site plan review for Precision Tune Auto Care subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Board Comments Mr. Wipperfurth asked if the adjacent lot, 7920 Lake Drive, is also zoned commercial. Ms. Larsen commented all the properties along Lake Drive are zoned commercial. Mr. Vojtech asked if there is any rule in place to limit how long a customer vehicle can be stored on site. He also asked if there is a vehicle size limitation. Ms. Eller said she did not think there are any requirements regarding storage duration or vehicle size. Mr. Evenson asked why a parkland dedication fee is not required. Ms. Eller explained a parkland dedication fee is not required because it is an existing lot. Ms. Larsen added a parkland dedication fee is only applicable when a lot is subdivided. i10 Mr. Evenson asked if a parkland dedication fee was received when the lot was created. Ms. Larsen said no. She stated the parcel is an existing lot from thel950s. She said the parcel is likely not a part of a plat or an old auditor's edition. Mr. Laden asked if staff received new architectural plans since the applicant's initial submittal. Ms. Eller said staff did not receive updated architectural plans. Mr. Laden said he was not comfortable moving this project onto City Council. He preferred the project return to the Planning and Zoning Board for review once an architectural plan that meets the City's standard is submitted. Mr. Root requested the applicant submit the southwest elevation, as viewed from Lake Drive. Chair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7:01 p.m. There was no one present for the public hearing. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 5 Applicant's Comments Paul Selbitschka said his business has been located at 550 Lilac Street since 2004. He explained, he is proposing this new building because he does not want to continue to be a lessee. He said he has already purchased the property and he is hopeful the project will move forward easily. Mr. Selbitschka commented he wants to ensure the project meets the City's requirements. Mr. Laden asked if the franchise provided Mr. Selbitschka with architectural drawings or if he provided his own drawings. Mr. Selbitschka said he provided his own drawings. Mr. Laden said the elevations provided do not meet the City's architectural standards. Mr. Selbitschka asked what standards need to be met. Mr. Laden explained the elevations need to show a strong base, middle, and cap. Brian Lubben, with Building Foundry, said he is the architect for Mr. Selbitschka and the project. He commented the elevations are a work in progress and he would be glad to work with staff to adjust them accordingly. Mr. Vojtech made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:04 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 6 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. Board Comments Mr. Reinert recommended moving the project forward to City Council and noting some architectural standards have not been met. This would allow the project to proceed and the City Council would be responsible for ensuring the standards are met prior to approval. Mr. Vojtech supported the project and commented it is in the City's best interest to retain existing Lino Lakes businesses. Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and site plan review for Precision Tune Auto Care subject to meeting architectural standards. Motion was supported by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 5 — 1. Chair Tralle abstained. Chair Tralle informed the Board it is Ms. Eller's last Planning and Zoning Board meeting. He thanked her for her presentation and her work with the City. He wished her well on her future endeavors. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 6 Ms. Eller said she enjoyed working for the City and she thanked staff and the Board for the opportunity. C. Belland Farms Final Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicant, Rehbein Properties, submitted a land use application for the final plat of Belland Farms. The plat creates 2 commercial lots. Lot 1 is 1.76 acres and a 12,230 sq. ft. medical eye clinic will be constructed on it. The name of the medical eye clinic is Associate Eye Care Partners. Lot 2 will be a future commercial development. Staff recommended approval of the Belland Farms final plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Board Comments Mr. Root commented staff did a great job addressing Hugo residents' traffic related questions during the preliminary plat review in October. Mr. Reinert asked if Otter Lake Road will be extended north of the Belland Farms and Main Street Shoppes development. 6 Ms. Larsen said Otter Lake Road will extend north and likely connect at Heritage Parkway in Hugo. Mr. Reinert commented the additional traffic on Otter Lake Road, generated by the Belland Farms development, will likely impact 241h Avenue as well. Ms. Larsen said motorists will have multiple travel options once Otter Lake Road is constructed to the north. Mr. Wipperfurth noted Rosemary Way will be extended across 241h Avenue and onto the Belland Farms site. He asked if Rosemary Way will continue and connect to the existing private street within the Main Street Shoppes site. Ms. Larsen said that is the current plan, but it could change. The developer of Belland Farms spoke with the developer of Main Street Shoppes and they agreed connecting Rosemary Way to the existing private street would be the best alignment option. However, if a development is constructed within the Main Street Shoppes site, the road could pivot north and branch off and connect to the private road servicing McDonald's and Dunkin Donuts. She noted Rosemary Way will connect to Otter Lake Road at some point, but the connection will be development driven. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2021 Page 7 Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Belland Farms final plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Proiect Updates Staff provided verbal updates to the Board on current City projects. Mr. Grochala stated Mr. Reinert will be concluding his term on the Planning and Zoning Board at the end of the year. He thanked Mr. Reinert for his service on the Park Board, City Council, Planning and Zoning Board, as Mayor, and as the Commissioner of Anoka County. Chair Tralle thanked Mr. Reinert for his time on the Board. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Evenson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:22 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 — 0. Chair Tralle abstained. Respectfully submitted, Janele Waterman, Community Development Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE Katie Larsen, City Planner January 12, 2022 REQUEST: NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates 1. Final Plat 2. Site & Building Plan Review CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: PF2021-001 FP2021-008 SP2021-004 Lino Lakes 72, LLC Attn: James E Illies 175 7th Ave S Waite Park, MN 56387 OWNER: Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc. Attn: Baleen Roberts 227th Street Court North Forest Lake, MN 55025 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: December 16, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: February 14, 2022 120-Day Review Deadline: April 15, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: January 4, 2022 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 12, 2022 City Council Work Session: February 7, 2022 City Council Meeting: February 14, 2022 BACKGROUND The applicant, Lino Lakes 72, LLC, is final platting a 4.5 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 72 unit, 55+ age restricted independent senior housing building called NorthPointe Garden Estates. It is important to note this is not an assisted -living or senior 1 care facility. This is an age -restricted multi -family building for seniors. The name of the final plat is NorthPointe 8th Addition. The Land Use Application is for the following: oo Final Plat o Outlot A, NorthPointe 51h Addition to Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 81h Addition oo Site & Building Plan Review o Independent senior housing building This staff report is based on the following information: oo INH Project Description oo ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021 oo Final Plat for NorthPoint 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received December 13, 2021 oo Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021 oo Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23, 2021 oo Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. dated September 8, 2021 oo Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared by Sz Traffic Solutions dated December 13, 2021 oo Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. dated January 5, 2022 ANALYSIS History The subject site is legally described as Outlot A, NorthPointe 51h Addition and is part of the NorthPointe residential housing development. Per the 2014 Council Resolution No. 14-21 approving the entire NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, this outlot is required to be developed as an age restricted (55+) multiple family dwelling consistent with the regulations of the R-4, High Density Residential District with underground parking for 50% of the required stalls and at a density of 20 to 25 dwelling units per acre. Future development of this outlot shall require a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, Development Contract and Site Plan Review. The Developer shall record against the outlot a declaration or other document stating these requirements. W Proposed Project Per the Applicant's Project Description, the improvements will consist of a 3 story 72 unit building, constructed over a one story at -grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The project will be constructed out of wood framing with the use of varying pitched roofs to give architectural appeal to the area. The use of varying styles of stone/brick help the building meet the 33% material requirements, while giving an aesthetic feel to the fagade. Varying siding and decorative elements make up the rest of the building design. Multiple amenity spaces are incorporated within the building enhancing the overall experience for the residents of this project. Featured amenities will include: On -site Management Office, Community Room, Fitness Center, Mail and Package Lockers, Woodshop, Game Room and Salon. A variety of floor plans will include One Bedroom, One Bedroom + Den, Two Bedroom and Two Bedroom + Den options for residents to select. A tentative 15 month construction schedule is May/June 2022 start and August 2023 completion and occupancy. Existing Site Conditions Per the December 10, 2021 Stormwater Management Plan, the 4.5 acre site is bounded on the north by wetland, on the east by Interstate 35E, on the south by agricultural property, and on the west by Chestnut Street. The site was previously partially graded as part of the overall mass grading for the Northpointe master plan of development. As part of the master plan of development, two wet sedimentation basins were constructed on or adjacent to the site to provide rate control and water quality treatment for the proposed site. The NorthPointe residential development consists of 216 single family detached homes. Zoning and Land Use In 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 02-14 rezoning the entire NorthPointe development including this outlot from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Current Zoning PUD, Planned Unit Development Current Land Use Vacant Residential Future Land Use per CP Medium Density Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Density Density calculations are based on the entire NorthPointe residential development. The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 94.09 Wetlands (9.21) Public Parks & Open Space (5.28) Arterial ROW (0.26) Other (Floodplain) (3.14) Other (Wetland Buffer -Conservation Easement Area) (5.72) Net Area (acres) 70.48 # of Units 299 Gross Density(units/acre) 3.18 Net Density (units/acre) 4.24 The 299 housing units consists of the 215 existing NorthPointe single family homes, existing house at 2162 Cedar Street, 11 future single homes and the proposed 72 unit independent senior building. The NorthPointe residential development was approved in 2014 under the land use control of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The development was guided medium density residential and required 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre. The developer wanted to build single family detached homes and in order to meet density requirement, this outlot was created and reserved for the purpose of constructing a higher density, age restricted, multi -family building. Under today's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the entire development is still guided medium density residential which requires 4.0 to 6.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of the entire development is 4.24 units per net acre which is consistent with the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan and NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan guided land use and density. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future 2040 Land Use North PUD, Planned Unit NorthPointe Park Park & Open Space Development South R, Rural Agricultural Low Density Residential M I-35E and R-1, Single Family Low Density East Single Family Residential Residential Residential PUD Planned Unit Open Space, Wetland Open Space & West Development & Single Family Single Family Residential Residential Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for medium density development & the NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat. The development also conforms with the zoning code requirements for R-4, High Density Residential District as detailed below. Blocks and Lots The NorthPointe preliminary plat was approved in March 2014. The final plat for Outlot A, NorthPointe 5a' Addition was approved in April 2017. This outlot is being re -platted for this project as Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 8th Addition. Streets and Alleys No new streets are required for the independent senior housing building. Driveway ingress/egress will be from Chestnut Street, a local road. The existing temporary cul de sac will remain for emergency vehicle turnaround. This cul de sac will be removed in the future when Chestnut Street extends to the south. No additional street right-of-way is required. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along the lot lines. A minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland and stormwater pond facility and is provided on the final plat. A separate trail easement for the existing trail on the northwest end of the lot has been recorded. Public Land Dedication 5 The City will collect a cash fee of $227,520 in lieu of land dedication for NorthPointe 8tn Addition. The independent senior housing building is within the NorthPointe park service area and no additional park land dedication is required. NorthPointe 8th Addition # Units = 72 7 Residential Park Dedication Fee = $3,160 TOTAL = $227,520 Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The applicant is proposing to construct a 3 story, 72 unit building, constructed over a one story at -grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The site plan includes a paved parking lot, detached garage, senior building, landscaped courtyard with fire pit and gazebo, dog park area, sidewalk connection to existing trail, wetland and stormwater pond open space. The building footprint is 36,677 sf. The attached Site Plan Review Worksheet details the projects compliance with zoning setbacks, building design criteria, height, lighting and parking requirements. Overall, the proposed independent senior housing building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Setbacks The R-4, High Density Residential District zoning requirements apply to this project. The Site Plan Review Worksheet details setback requirements. The principal building 30ft setback is met along the Chestnut Street front lot line. The 20ft north and south side yard setbacks are also met. Staff notes the detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street and would need to be relocated or removed. PUD Flexibility The required building setback along an arterial street (I-35E) is 40ft. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility to reduce this setback from 40ft to 20ft to allow for the proposed building footprint and development of the courtyard amenities. The building will be 120ft from the centerline of the southbound lane of 1-35E and 330ft from the nearest house in NorthPointe. Shifting the building east also provides additional separation from the NorthPointe single family detached homes. C� Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials Per City Code Section 1007.043(2), General Building and Use Provisions: (c) Multiple Family Apartments Construction Standards: 1. The exterior of multiple family dwelling structures shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, multiple family dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a. A minimum of thirty-three (33) percent of the combined area of all building exterior walls of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone. b. For the purposes of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. Exterior materials consist of stone veneer, brick veneer, LP lap siding and asphalt shingles. The building includes decorative trim board, stone band, stone cap, 4" window trim, horizontal LP lap siding, vertical board and batten and decorative gable corbels. This variety of materials and accents provide visual interest, articulation and depth to the building. The color palette consists of greys (carbon, driftwood gray), black, white and browns (Java and wood grain siding). The building has 41% masonry stone and brick. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. Per City Code Section 1007.095 R-4, High Density Residential District: (1) Height Regulation. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty-five (45) feet in height —or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4) stories or forty-five (45) feet —except as allowed by § 1007.043 (3). The R-4 zoning district allows for 4 story multiple dwelling buildings. The proposed senior building is 4 stories (52ft measured to the roof midpoint) and is compliant with performance standards. Trash/recycling enclosure and mechanical equipment are located inside the building in the garage level. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. The following chart is a summary of the bedroom and unit mix: 7 # of Bedrooms # of Units One bedroom = 3 One bedroom with den = 10 Two bedrooms = 47 Two bedrooms with den = 12 TOTAL = City Code Section 1007.095(5) states the minimum livable floor area for each multiple family dwelling unit shall be 700 sf plus 100ft additional square feet for each bedroom. This would require the one bedroom units to be a minimum 800 sf and the two bedroom units to be a minimum of 900 sf. Sheets A102-A104 provides a summary chart of the unit sizes ranging from 792sf to 1,284sf. The A.1 one bedroom units are less than 800sf and shall be revised. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. The site photometric plan shows 5 light poles in the parking lot that are 25 ft tall with downlit and cutoff light fixtures. The foot candle measurements, light poles and fixtures meet ordinance requirements. Off -Street Parking Requirements Per City Code Section 1007.044(6), (d) Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one- half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. In addition to the City ordinance, PUD Resolution No. 14-21 requires 50% of the parking stalls to be underground. The 72 unit senior building requires 72 parking spaces with at least 36 underground. Sheet C3, Site Plan indicates 62 surface stalls, 2 handicap surface stalls, 72 interior (underground) and 9 detached garage stalls for a total of 145 parking spaces. Parking requirements are met. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10 2021, the drainage boundary being considered is 113.810 acres, which includes all drainage from the overall Northpointe development. Drainage areas affected by the proposed construction include the stormwater pond 300P located in the northern portion N. of the site, the stormwater pond 200P just outside the west-northwest property boundary (Pond 200P), Catchment 33S and 12S to Wetland 1P, which also receives stormwater from the outlets of Ponds 200P and 300P, and Catchment 11 S to Ditch 3P, which is the receiving body for Wetland 1P. The proposed site will only affect drainage to these areas. The majority of the site flows to Ponds 200P and 300P. The remaining stormwater drains between Ponds 200P and 300P to Wetland 1P or to Ditch 3P. All stormwater, ultimately flows to Ditch 3P. The proposed construction will maintain the drainage areas provided in the overall Northpointe master development plan to the maximum extent possible. The proposed apartment lot will meet the overall stormwater treatment requirements from the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit. Adequate water quality treatment and rate control is provided by the existing regional ponds, wetlands, and ditches. All storm sewers have been sized to accommodate a 10-year storm at a minimum. The proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the existing stormwater infrastructure originally planned for the development of the site. The City Engineer and RCWD will review the stormwater management plan. Public Utilities The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The following Tree Preservation and Landscaping information is from the January 4, 2022 Environmental Board staff report. The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. The Tree Preservation Plan calls for preserving 22 of 55 trees inventoried. The plan calls for removals of 33 trees of 55 trees inventoried. All of the removals are in Basic Use Areas, which are within grading limits, or associated with construction of a retaining wall on the east perimeter. Removals: Basic Use Area Natural Resource Protected Area Non -Environmentally Sensitive Area Mitigation Trees Required 27 No 27 0 6 6 No 2 0 27 of the removals are in Basic Use Area, and non -environmentally sensitive areas. These removals will not require mitigation trees. The other 6 removals are in Basic Use Area and Natural Resource Protected Area. These trees require 1 mitigation tree for every 2 trees removed. In this case, three of these trees are undesirable, due to being in poor condition or being an invasive species. The other 3 trees require mitigation at the rate of 1 mitigation tree per 2 trees removed, resulting in 2 mitigation trees being required for the project. The 2 green ash (T1040 and T1041) should be added to the removals list. Any trees to be preserved must be protected as described in the Tree Protection Fence Detail. This detail plate should be added to the details sheet in the plans. Mitigation trees have been credited through open space plantings. Preservation and mitigation standards have been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs 109,831 sq. ft. of open space calls for: 55 large trees 165 large shrubs Provided: 61 large trees or large tree equivalents 115 large shrubs or large shrub equivalents Existing trees are credited at the following rates: Existing Tree Value deciduous deciduous trees trees under trees between oe ►•12" QBH over G" Q&H ��r 6"-12" QBH Tree Size or evergreen evergreen or evergreen trees over 20' trees under trees between tall. 12' tall 12'-20' tall Tree 1 large tree 2 large trees lame trees Value There are 23 large trees worth (14 actual trees) of existing tree credit for trees being saved in the northeast corner near the stormwater pond and in the southwest near the 10 wetland. Trees that were noted in the Preservation Plan as being saved that did not receive existing tree credit include prohibited species (ash, Blue spruce, cottonwood) and two dead trees. The additional 38 large trees or large tree equivalents are in the common area, near the north stormwater pond, and on the west perimeter of the site. While 166 large shrub or large shrub equivalents were planted site -wide, they are not all applicable by placement. The 115 large shrubs or large shrub equivalents in the common area in the center of the building all count towards open space standards (sheet L2), as do the shrubs in the accent sign planting. The plants in foundation landscape zone and vehicular hardscape area do not count towards open space standards (sheet L3). The rest of the shrubs planted are in these two areas. Note that from the planting schedule, 14 plants were categorized as large shrubs, 176 as medium shrubs, and 105 as small shrubs. Swapping some of the smaller plants for larger varieties would save considerably on planting quantities. Open areas landscape standards have not been met. 50 additional shrubs will be needed in open space areas. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. Buffer and/or screen will be required along the east lot line. The retaining wall will satisfy part of the requirements. Planting an additional 4 trees and 5 large shrubs will satisfy the requirements. Note that these plants will also satisfy the foundation landscape requirements for the northeast building face. Buffers and screens as planned do not meet the requirements. Canopy Cover The purpose of this requirement is to mitigate the effects of vehicular hardscape by establishing tree canopy cover to intercept rainfall, protect pavement from sun deterioration, reduce the heat island effect, and improve aesthetics. Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Vehicular hardscape planned: 37,779 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 15,112 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 15,425 sq. ft. 11 Canopy cover requirements have been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs The applicable building faces are the southwest side facing Chestnut Street (approximately 120 ft.), and the east side facing 35E (approximately 315 ft.). The foundation plantings required for the southwest side: Required: 2 large trees 7 large shrubs Provided: 4 large tree equivalents 23 large shrub equivalents The foundation plantings required for the east side: Required: 6 large trees 19 large shrubs Provided: 2 large tree equivalents and 14 large shrubs equivalents 4 large trees and 5 large shrubs should be planted east of the retaining wall along the northeast section of building that runs parallel with the lot line. The foundation landscape requirements have not been met for the east building face. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The plan indicates sod in the common area in the center of the building, along the east and west building faces, and along the south edge of the parking lot and access road. Mn DOT seed mix 34-271, wet meadow, is indicated for the disturbed areas near the two stormwater ponds, and east of the retaining wall that runs along the east building face. Mn DOT seed mix 35-241, mesic prairie, is indicated for the disturbed area south of pond 300, and disturbed area near the wetland in the south of the parcel. 12 Due to the area east of the retaining wall being higher in elevation, on sandy soil, and being quite exposed, a dry prairie mix should be better suited than the wet meadow mix proposed. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required for multi -family developments at a rate of 1 tree per 70 linear feet. The front lot line along Chestnut Street is 173 if which would require 2 boulevard trees. Five (5) boulevard trees are proposed and this requirement has been met. Signage Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument and wall signs. Sign permit applications are required for all temporary signs as well. Impervious Surface Coverage The R-4 zoning district states the impervious surface of the property shall not exceed 65%. Plan Sheet C3, Site Plan notes 44% hard/impervious surface. Impervious surface requirements are met. Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was completed in November 2013 by Westwood Professional Services as part of the overall NorthPointe residential development and it included analysis for an 85 unit senior apartment. This report detailed compliance with City ordinance level of service requirements for the entire development. A Traffic Analysis Memorandum was completed on December 13, 2021 by S2 Traffic Solutions as an update to the 2013 study reflecting the proposed 72 unit senior building. Trip Generation Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) standards and traffic counts collected by Quality Counts on December 7, 2021, the 72 unit senior building is forecasted to generate approximately 233 daily trips with 15 peak hour AM trips (7:15- 8:15am) and 18 peak hour PM trips (4:15-5:15pm). Land Use (Code) Sipe wily AM Peak dour PM Peak Hour nter_L Exit E�er Exit Senior Attached Hauling (252) 72 Units 233 Trips 5 Trips 10 Trips 10 Trips 8 Trips TOTAL 233 Trips 15 Trfps LH Trips It is important to note that an age -restricted 55+ independent senior housing building will generate less trips than a multi -family housing building. 13 Existing Arterial and Collector Roadway AADT & Capacity RoadwayFunctional AADT' Daily Road Class (year) Capacity Main St (CSAH 14) Minor Arterial 16,500 (2018) 22,000 20th Ave S (CSAH 54) Minor Arterial 3,000-6,100 (2018) 15,000 Birch St (CSAH 34) Major Collector 3,150 (2018) 15,000 Ash St (CR J) Minor Arterial 10,500 (2014) 15,000 'Annual Average Daily Traffic The AADT on the existing arterial and collector roadways are less than daily road capacity. The roadway network has capacity for an additional 233 daily trips generated by the senior housing building. Level of Service Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions and driver delay (measured in seconds) of an intersection. Operations are given letter designations from "A" (best operating conditions) to "F" (worst conditions). City Code Section 1007.020, Site Plan Review and Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. 2024 No -Build Overall LOS 2024 Build Overall LOS Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak 20th Ave S& Main St C C C C 201h Ave S& W Cedar St A A A A 201h Ave S& Red Oak Ln A A A A 20th Ave S& Birch St A A A A 20th Ave S& Ash St B B B C The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore the subdivision is not considered premature and the traffic generated by the senior building is within the capabilities of the City's road system. 14 NorthPointe Road System Red Oak Lane, Cypress Street and 21St Avenue South are minor collector roads within the NorthPointe residential development. Minor collector roads are designed and intended to handle 1,000+ daily trips. Per the original 2013 NorthPointe Traffic Study, the entire NorthPointe residential development (single family homes and senior apartment) was projected to have 313 housing units and generate approximately 2,534 daily trips. This is well within the capacity of the entire NorthPointe road system. The actual housing unit count of 299 is less than the original 313. In December 2019, a Traffic Impact Study completed for Nadeau Acres collected existing daily traffic counts on Red Oak Lane east of 20th Avenue S. at 1,000 ADT. The City also collected daily traffic counts in August 2021 on Red Oak Lane east of 201h Ave S. at 987 ADT. These trip counts are consistent and are low for a minor collector road. Figure 6 of the 2021 Traffic Analysis completed for NorthPointe Garden Estates indicates 10 additional AM peak trips and 8 additional PM peak trips on Red Oak Lane. As noted, level of service is not impacted. The 18 existing homes on Chestnut Street generate approximately 180 daily trips. The local road has capacity for 1,000 daily trips. Chestnut Street has capacity for an additional 233 daily trips generated by the senior housing building. It should also be noted that Chestnut Street, 21St Avenue S., Cypress St. and Red Oak Lane all have sidewalks that provide safe pedestrian corridors in the area. A trail from Chestnut Street extends to NorthPointe Park. Further, with future development of the property south of NorthPointe, Cypress Street and Chestnut Street will extend south and Birch Street will extend east providing additional ingress and egress roads to the development. Conclusion The traffic study results are similar and marginally better than predicted in the original analysis. The proposed development has appropriate access to the site and to the surrounding roadway network. The traffic operational analysis indicates there is available capacity on the roadways surrounding the site to accommodate site -generated traffic. Staff will re-evaluate resident concerns regarding current speeding and traffic issues on Red Oak Lane and Dogwood Court unrelated to the NorthPointe Garden Estates project. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) 15 The site is within the revised 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The project is consistent with Land Use Scenario 1 and 2 for medium density residential development. No further environmental review is required. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on December 3, 2013 for the entire NorthPointe development. A WCA Notice of Decision (NOD) was issued by RCWD on April 11, 2014. The NOD is only valid for 5 years so a new wetland delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug on September 8, 2021 for the one (1) existing wetland on the senior housing building site. A new WCA NOD approving the wetland delineation was issued by RCWD on October 21, 2021. One 0.085 acre wetland area was delineated on the south end the site. The wetland is a Type 3/2 (PEMC/A) shallow marsh and wet meadow wetland. The wetland area (0.085 acre) is slightly smaller than the original approved wetland area (0.12 acre). No impacts to this wetland are proposed. The wetland is part of the Wetland Management Corridor and a conservation easement currently exists over the wetland as part of the original NorthPointe development. The easement area may be amended to allow for design of the parking lot with approval from RCWD. The total area of the easement would remain the same. A minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easement is required and is provided above the delineated wetland. Shoreland District The site is not within a Shoreland District. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA floodplain map indicates Zone A floodplain along the west edge of the site. However, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was obtained on December 21, 2016 for the entire NorthPointe development. The floodplain boundary was revised and is no longer on the site. Noise Study A Traffic Noise Assessment for NorthPointe Garden Estates was completed on January 5, 2022 by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The report evaluated I-35E noise compared to daytime and nighttime noise standards. Noise standards are met under the following conditions: 16 1. The building shall be constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A). 2. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control. 3. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows. 4. Per page 8 of the Traffic Noise Assessment, exterior wall construction shall consist of: a. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior wall. i. This material will be 7/16" thick and a wood fiber material. b. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation. c. The inside finish shall be 5/8" gypsum board. d. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354" and be of a wood fibrous material. e. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970" and be of a wood fibrous material. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments MNDOT MNDOT is reviewing the final plat and will provide comment. Public Safety Comments The Fire Division reviewed the plans and notes the following: 1. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the building. a. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to provide emergency vehicle access. 2. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be added. 3. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance stretchers. The Police Division reviewed the plans and did not identify any public safety concerns that should be addressed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their January 4, 2022 meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. City Attorney The City Attorney is reviewing the title commitment and final plat. Any comments shall be addressed prior to Council approval of the final plat. Agreements 17 Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City as it relates to the NorthPointe 81n Addition final plat. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement may be required by the City as is relates to the NorthPointe Garden Estates development or the required securities may be collected with the Development Agreement. Declaration of Covenants As required by Resolution No. 14-21, the developer shall record against the property an age -restriction declaration. The applicant has submitted a declaration and it is under review by the City Attorney. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP's such as curb, gutter, and stormwater pond. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for medium density residential. The proposed independent senior housing building is consistent with residential density land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are supported by the independent senior housing building. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. The arterial, collector and local roads have capacity to handle the traffic volume of the independent senior housing building. Sidewalks and trails are in place to provide safe pedestrian corridors. Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Findings of Fact -Final Plat The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and Not applicable. The final plat is for an independent senior housing building. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. Conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat and site & building plan review for NorthPointe 8t' Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates. The following conditions apply to the approval of the final plat and site & building plan review: l . The existing conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration may be amended with approval from RCWD. 2. A Development Agreement and securities related to the final plat are required. 3. A Site Performance Agreement and securities related to NorthPointe Garden Estates are required or securities shall be collected with the Development Agreement. 19 4. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. 5. A temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit are required over the cul-de-sac. 6. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon and wall signage. 7. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage. 8. Planned Unit Development, PUD flexibility is provided to reduce the principal and accessory building setback along I-35E from 40ft to 20ft. 9. All parking stalls (surface, interior garage and detached garage) shall be provided rent free to all tenants. 10. The following noise mitigation standards apply: a. The building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A). b. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control. c. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows. d. Exterior wall construction shall consist o£ i. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior wall. 1. This material will be 7/16" thick and a wood fiber material. ii. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation. iii. The inside finish shall be 5/8" gypsum board. iv. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354" and be of a wood fibrous material. v. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970" and be of a wood fibrous material. The following comments shall be addressed prior to City Council approval: 1. All comments from the City Engineer memo dated January 5, 2022 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated January 5, 2022 shall be addressed. 3. The following comments from the Lino Lakes Fire Division shall be addressed: a. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the building. i. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to provide emergency vehicle access. ii. The developer shall consult with Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire and City Engineer. b. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be added. c. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance stretchers. 4. All comments from the MNDOT (to follow) shall be addressed. 5. The applicant shall draft a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities for the private stormwater maintenance facility. 20 6. The applicant shall draft a temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit for the cul- de-sac. 7. The applicant shall draft an amendment to the existing Conservation Easement and Wetland Buffer Declaration for City review and comment. a. The documents shall include both RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes as parties. b. The exhibit shall provide location of Protected Open Space Area monument signs. 8. All applicable plan sheets: a. All plan sheets shall be dated. b. The detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street and shall be relocated or removed. 9. Sheet C3, Site Plan: a. Setbacks shall be measured from balcony support beams on the north side of the building. 10. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan: a. A landscape screen and buffer are required along the east and south lot lines. 11. Sheets A102-A104 Floor Plans: a. The A.1 one bedroom unit is less than 800sf and shall be revised. 12. Sheet AO 10, Site Plan: a. The parking calculations shall be revised to reflect City ordinance requirements. b. Setback lines i. The front building setback line shall note 30ft. ii. The "25 number note" on the north side near the detached garage shall point to the 20ft setback line. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Maps-600' Scale and 200' Scale 2. City Engineer Memo dated January 5, 2022 3. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated January 5, 2022 4. Site Plan Worksheet 5. INH Project Description 6. Preliminary Plat for NorthPointe prepared by Carlson McCain dated June 9, 2014 7. Final Plat for NorthPointe 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received December 13, 2021 8. ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021 9. Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 10. Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021 11. Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23, 2021 21 N Aerial Map-600' scale 0 300 boo 1,200 C_ i T Y O F W- �/ , E Feet LNC3L KES NorthPointe Garden Estates S LACASSE DR ' y 1-35E AM 84 } v ' 6 �T i N Aerial Map-200' scale 0 100 Zoo 400 C I T Y*VIK O F W- �/ , E Feet LNCES NorthPointe Garden Estates S. 2 0 0 0 z W CO U) 0 Ln ,It 00 00 LO CD 0 N W H Z) W W af F- U) M W 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Kelsey Gelhar, EIT, WSB Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: January 5, 2022 Re: NorthPointe Garden Estates Final Plat Review WSB Project Number — 019565-000 WSB has reviewed the final plat for the NorthPointe Garden Estates development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Carlson McCain, received on December 13, 2021. These comments are based on the following final plan sets and plat documents: DO NorthPointe 81" Addition Final Plat prepared by Carlson McCain, received December 13, 2021 00 Site Plans for the NorthPointe Garden Estates prepared by Carlson McCain, dated December 10, 2021, received December 13, 2021 00 NorthPointe Garden Estates Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated December 10, 2021, received December 13, 2021 00 NorthPointe Garden Estates ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain, dated November 12, 2021, received December 13, 2021 oo Traffic Analysis Memorandum — NorthPointe Senior Apartments prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions, dated December 13, 2021, received December 13, 2021 Applicant to respond to these comments in writing on this word document. Any changes to the plans that are not associated with these comments shall be identified by either a summary in the response or in the plans with a revision cloud or note. Engineering • General The NorthPointe Garden Estates development proposes to create one parcel for an apartment building with 72 units. The apartment building will be accessed from Chestnut Street and is adjacent to 1-35E. The lot is approximately 4.5 acres. The proposed improvements include the 72-unit apartment building, a parking lot, a patio area, storm sewer, site grading, and sanitary and water services. Comments: 1. Applicant to show light pole and base locations and location of electric transformer before final plat can be approved. Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 2 2. Applicant to consider moving the proposed pedestrian ramp by the two handicap stalls off the southeast corner of the building to are area between the proposed stalls or adding an additional pedestrian ramp. • Grading & Stormwater Management The NorthPointe Garden Estates will require site grading for the proposed apartment building, retaining wall, utilities, patio area, and parking lot. The minimum elevation for the building pads is dependent on the groundwater elevation and the design of the stormwater facilities. The proposed project is within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Stormwater BMPs are needed to meet City stormwater requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet City stormwater requirements by utilizing ponds previously constructed with earlier additions of the NorthPointe development. The design of the ponds shall meet the requirements of Table 6 of the City's Stormwater Management ordinance. Comments: 1. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height will require a structural engineering design to be submitted prior to approval of the final plat. 2. Applicant to submit verification that a retaining wall of that height can be as close to the building as proposed. 3. Applicant to clarify the type of material being used for the 27" diameter storm structures (i.e. PVC, concrete, etc.). 4. Staff has concerns about the run of storm sewer from CB 109 to STMH 106 being too close to the proposed retaining wall and building. Staff concerns are summarized below: a. Weight of the structures and possible surcharge behind the wall b. Seepage at pipe to structure connections c. Issues with maintenance and future replacement access d. Storm pipes and structures should be above the building footing in this area 5. Stormwater from the parking lot should not drain directly into the city -maintained, existing stormwater pond closest to Chestnut Street. Applicant to provide pretreatment via a basin or structure prior to discharging to the pond. 6. Applicant to provide additional details on the time of concentration calculation, specifically for sub -catchments 20S and 30S, including the assumed flow paths. 7. The outlet pipe from OCS 116 is shown to have an invert of 910.64 on Sheet C7 but is modeled with an invert of 910.50. Applicant to verify which is correct and update the plans and report. • Water Supply There is currently an existing 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main along Chestnut Street. There is an 8-inch DIP stub to the property. The applicant is proposing to extend the 8-inch DIP pipe to serve the building. One hydrant is proposed in the parking lot. Comments: NorthPointe Garden Estates Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 3 1. The Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire Division will review the hydrant layout. Staff anticipate that another hydrant will be needed in order to access the entire building. 2. Applicant is responsible for verifying water suppression needs for the building. Potential looping within the site may be necessary. • Sanitary Sewer There is currently an existing 8-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sewer main along Chestnut Street. There is an 8-inch PVC stub to the property. The applicant is proposing to connect to the 8-inch diameter stub with a 6-inch PVC service. The applicant is proposing multiple clean outs due to the length of the service. Comments: 1. Applicant is responsible for verifying that a 6-inch diameter pipe is sufficient for serving the proposed building. • Transportation The site is located at the end of Chestnut Street and the proposed property will have access off of the existing temporary cul-de-sac. Chestnut Street is a local street. A right-of-way width 60-ft is required for local streets. The existing right-of-way along Chestnut Street meets this requirement. A traffic study was submitted for review. Comments: 1. Applicant to extend surmountable curb and gutter for the parking lot entrance through the temporary cul-de-sac to better indicate where the driveway will be once the temporary cul-de-sac is removed (see existing Chestnut Street curb and gutter as example). Cul-de-sac will be removed when Chestnut Street extends to the south. 2. Applicant to submit turning movements for the proposed parking lot to verify that emergency vehicles (i.e. fire trucks) can access the building. 3. Applicant to update the table in the traffic study to include existing counts on Red Oak Lane and Cedar Street. 4. Applicant to document the impacts to local residential streets such as Chestnut Street, Cypress Street, and Red Oak Lane. Impacts include identifying the anticipated percent increase in traffic on these roadways. 5. The study analyzed impacts for the 2024 Build Conditions. Applicant to update the study to also look at the 2040 Build Condition and take into account the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 6. Applicant to submit the capacity analysis worksheet so staff can verify assumptions. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan NorthPointe Garden Estates Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 4 There is one existing wetland on the south side of the site. The plans note that the wetland was delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Co. in 2021. The wetland is within the City's Wetland Management Corridor and a conservation easement currently exists over the wetland. The applicant is proposing to change the buffer and easement around the wetland. Comments: 1. RCWD to review the wetland buffer and easement modifications being proposed by the applicant. 2. No tree or vegetation removal within the existing wetland buffer and easement will be allowed until RCWD approves proposed wetland buffer and easements. • Landscaping Landscaping will be reviewed in depth by the City's Environmental Coordinator. Comments: Staff recommends adjusting landscaping so that no trees are planted over utility pipes. • Floodplain There is existing Zone AE floodplain on and adjacent to the NorthPointe Garden Estates site. There is a LOMR, effective 12/21/16, that shows the BFE elevations of Pond 200P at 913 and Pond 300P at 915 (NAD 83 datum). Comments: 1. The improvements proposed by the applicant change the pond BFEs and the applicant shall verify if a new or revised LOMR is required. • Drainage and Utility Easements Per City Code, the City requires 10-ft wide drainage and utility (D&U) easements along plat boundaries and along lot lines. Drainage and utility easements along lot lines are allowed to be centered on common rear and side lot lines. There are existing D&U and sidewalk and trail easements on the north portion of the site. The applicant is proposing 10-ft D&U easements along the east plat boundary and the boundary adjacent to Chestnut Street and 5-ft D&U easements along the northwest plat boundaries that are adjacent to city -owned property. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing easement that encompasses the wetland in the southern portion of the site. Comments: 1. Applicant to update D&U easements around the plat boundary to be 10-ft wide. 2. Applicant to provide a temporary easement over the temporary cul-de-sac. Oc Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. NorthPointe Garden Estates Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 5 00 Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater ponds will be privately maintained and a Stormwater Maintenance Declaration will be required with the final plat. Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. MnDOT Right -of -Way Permit may also be needed If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. NorthPointe Garden Estates Final Plat Engineering Review CITY OF LINO KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: January 5th, 2022 Environmental Memo Re: Environmental Board Comments/January 4th, 2022/North Pointe Garden Estates The Environmental Board, at their January 4th, 2022 meeting, had the following recommendations for NorthPointe 8th Addition final plat and North Pointe Garden Estates site and building plan review: 1. Blanding's turtle flyer and factsheet shall be distributed to all contractors working on the site. 2. MnDOT type 3N or 4N bio-netting or natural netting erosion control blanket should be used where blanket is necessary for stabilization to minimize wildlife impacts. 3. Surmountable curb sections should be added in the vicinity of the blue highlights below to allow for passage of wildlife (turtles). 0 Page 1 4. A noise study will be required. 5. Trees to be preserved must have tree protection fence installed as described in the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. This should be added to the details sheet in the plans and referenced in the landscape specifications. 6. Two green ash (T1040 and T1041) should be added to the removals list. These trees will not require mitigation trees to be planted. 7. Plant quantities should be indicated on landscape plan sheets. 8. Open area landscape standards require an additional 50 large shrubs to be planted in open areas, preferably in the open space near pond 300, in the sodded area near the wetland buffer, or along the east perimeter. 9. Foundation landscape standards have not been met. An additional 4 large trees and 5 large shrubs will be required for the northeast building face, east of the retaining wall. 10. Buffer and Screen requirements have not been met. The plants added for the foundation landscape standards will also satisfy the buffer and screen requirements. • Page 2 11. Mn DOT 34-271, a wet meadow seed mix, is specified for the east perimeter. A seed mix, such as 35-221 Dry Prairie General, should be more suitable to the high, dry conditions in this specific area. 12.All native seeding is subject to the City Native Plant Establishment Requirements. This should be noted in the landscape specifications. 13. Mulch used for stabilization should be type 3, with MCIA tags provided to the City at time of install. This should be noted in the landscape specifications. 0 Page 3 CITY, OF LNCKES PROJECT: NorthPointe Garden Estates Planning & Zoning Board Date: January 5, 2022 City Council Date: February 14, 2022 ZONING/LAND USE Zoning District PUD Future Land Use Plan MDR Sewered or Unsewered Lot Sewered CUP required? No Comprehensive Plan Amendment? No Rezoning required? No Variance required? PUD Required Proposed Lot size (sq. ft) 20,000 196,177 Lot width (ft.) 100 172 SITE PLAN REVIEW WORKSHEET DATE: December 15, 2021 REVISED: To be addressed by applicant To be approved by City Council NOTES: Resolution No. 14-21 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan for NorthPointe Setback flexibility provided through PUD 1/5/2022 1 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates Setbacks -Street (ft) Principal Building -Local Street -Chestnut Principal Building -Arterial Street-135E Parking Lot Accessory Structure Setbacks -Side Yard -North (ft) Principal Building Accessory Building Parking Lot/Driveway Setbacks -Side Yard -South (ft) Principal Building Accessory Building Parking Lot/Driveway From Low Density Residential District Buffer (side and rear) Impervious Surface Coverage Area Building Design Standards Unit Floor Area Utility Area Required Pr000sed 30 256 40 25.5 & 35.8 15 87 & 50.3 NA 87 Reauired Pr000sed 20 26.9 & 30.9 5 10.7 5 5 Reauired Proposed 20 160 5 130 5 41.6 Required Pr000sed 35 NA 20 Required 65% max 44% Required Proposed 700 sf + 100 sf 792-1,284 NA NA PUD flexibility provided for 20ft setback variation Setback measurements for building to be measure to balcony support poles Accessory structures (detached garage) not allowed in front yard. detached garage NorthPointe residential development is guided Medium Density Residential. A landscape buffer is required along the east and south lot line. 700 sf + 100 sf for each bedroom required. Units A.1 and A.1 B shall be revised. Additional 100sf for utility area only required for individual access housing product. 1/5/2022 2 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates Height GENERAL BUILDING & USE PROVISIONS Building Type and Construction The exterior of multiple family dwelling structures shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. a. A minimum of thirty-three (33) percent of the combined area of all building exterior walls of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone. b. For the purposes of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage Mechanical equipment screened Accessory buildings or structures Number of structures Size Refuse and recylable materials enclosure Required Proposed 45' or 4 stories 4 stories Multi -Family Yes Yes Yes Yes Required Proposed None 1 None 2,332 sf Required Proposed 6ft height Inside 80% opaque NA For multiple dwelling building, the greater of 4 stories or 45 ft. le Familv Apartments Construction Standards Exterior materials consist of stone veneer, brick veneer, LP lap siding, asphalt shingl Including glass, 33.75% of exterior material is masonry (stone and brick) Excluding glass, 41 % of exterior material is masonry (stone and brick) Mechanical equipment is located inside the building A detached 9 stall garage is proposed. Location in front yard not allowed. 22' x 106' = 2,332 sf Refuse is located inside in the building on the garage first floor level 1/5/2022 3 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates Outdoor lighting 1.0 ft candle allowance onto right of way 0.4 ft candle allowance onto adjacent prop. Hooded lights Height Setback from Street ROW Setback from Side or Rear Additional Performance Standards Smoke, Dust, Odors, Noise Sewage Disposal (on -site) Waste material Bulk storage (liquid) Radiation emission Electrical emission Exterior storage OK Reauired Proposed 30 ft max. 25 ft loft 110&80 5 ft 85 & 86 NA NA NA NA NA foot candle does not exceed 1.0 fc foot candle does not exceed 0.4 fc light fixtures are down lit 5 parking lot light poles with 7 light fixtures are proposed Normal construction activity 1/5/2022 4 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates Landscaping Parking Angle of parking Stall Width & Length Curb length per car Stall Depth Wall to Aisle Stall Depth Interlock to Aisle Aisle Width One Way Aisle Width Two Way Curb cut access 30 feet from intersection Curb cut access 40 feet from one another Curb cut and driveway 5 feet from side yard Curb cut width Grade elevation Striping 4" wide Landscaping is reviewed by the Environmental Coordinator and Environmental Board. Reauired Pronosed 9' x 18' 9' x 18' 9' 9' 18' 18' 18' 18' 24' 24' 24' 24' 780 ft 200 ft 65&40ft Reauired Proposed 36 feet max. 24 ft 5% 3.1% 4" 4" Nearest intersection is 21 st Ave South. Nearest driveway is 200ft to the north on Chestnut St 1/5/2022 5 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates Continuous concrete perimeter curb barrier Six (6)+ stalls adjacent to street or residential requires berm, wall or fence Parking lot landscaping Six (6)+ stalls requires landscaping Commercial uses with 50+ stalls require islands NOT APPLICABLE # stall requirements # handicap stall requirements Off-street loading Located no less than 50 ft from intersection Located no less than 50 ft from residential Shall not occupy front yard space Shall be screened from residential Yes NA Yes Yes 100 s.f. per 25 stalls # of stalls Required Proposed 72 145 5 5 NA NA NA NA parking lot is not adjacent to street or residential. parking lot is not adjacent to public right of way /25= 0 x 100 0 s.f. of island required Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing requires 1 space per unit. PUD Res. No 14-21 requires 50% to be underground. 72 units requires 72 stalls with 36 being covered. Proposed = 64 surface + 72 interior covered + 9 detached = 145 1/5/2022 6 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates SPECIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Yes Resolution No. 14-21 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat SPECIAL REVIEW REGULATIONS Shoreland District No Floodplain District No RCWD or VLAWMO? RCWD Town Center Design & Development Guide NA Industrial Park Covenants NA Signage Permit Required Permits are required for all temporary and permanent signage EAW/AUAR COMPLIANCE Does an EAW/AUAR exist? Yes 2020 AUAR 1-35E Corridor Is an EAW/AUAR required? No Is project in compliance? Yes Project is consistent with Land Use Scenario 1 for medium density residential Does EAU/AUAR need to be revised? No None ADDITIONAL NOTES 1/5/2022 7 Site Plan Worksheet-NorthPointe Garden Estates k2W• Michael J. Staebe, CPMa', Primary Broker/Principal Prop ertle James B. lilies, CPMS. CCIM. Principal J*�l` Stoe6e, Illies, tVotlinrrgel Go. Primart H,oker—Hamilton INH.Vgr. 01Z Ryan Nothnagel, CPM', CCIM, Principal Established rp8i Project Description INH Properties is serving as Developer, Professional Property Management Agent and Investor for the proposed project, a 55+ age restricted independent senior housing building. The legal ownership entity will be Lino Lakes 72, LLC and development named NorthPointe Garden Estates. Housing demand for this project was confirmed by a third party housing study completed in October 2021, indicating 84 units of senior housing demand for the site location. INH has over 41 years' experience in multi -family housing, and the firm is an Accredited Management Organization (AMO) and the principals are all Certified Property Managers (CPM). INH currently manages over 7,000 units throughout Minnesota. The ownership intends to hold this project as a longterm investment. The improvements will consist of a 3 story 72 unit building, constructed over a one story at -grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The project will be constructed out of wood framing with the use of varying pitched roofs to give architectural appeal to the area. The use of varying styles of stone/brick help the building meet the 33% material requirements, while giving an aesthetic feel to the fagade. Varying siding and decorative elements make up the rest of the building design. Multiple amenity spaces are incorporated within the building enhancing the overall experience for the residents of this project. Featured amenities will include: On -site Management Office, Community Room, Fitness Center, Mail and Package Lockers, Woodshop, Game Room and Salon. A variety of floor plans will include One Bedroom, One Bedroom + Den, Two Bedroom and Two Bedroom + Den options for residents to select. The development team has engaged Cole Group Architects and Carlson McCain for design and engineering. Request for Proposals from General Contractors will be made in December and a contractor awarded by February 2022, with the intent to commence construction by May/June 2022. The construction is estimated to be completed within 15 months, and open for occupancy by August 2023. 175 Th Avenue South I Waite Park, MN 56387 1 Office: 320.252.2000 1 Fax: 320.252.2752 1 www.inhproperties.com L-------,�., — N88°19'38"E _ L�,�,�,�.�.r,�.,�.,� ---- �— � C E D A R 205.06 S T R E E T -------- -----`------9LS -------- ----------- - - __—Ex. se Fly URE SING A ILY I 0 jTLOT L Id- / D F '�URE F+ J r Go Ex.Bldg � I / CONSERVATION / POND L EASEMENT OUTLOT I CONSERVATION (.33 EASEMENT -� acres (UPLAND) OVrOT `/ 01 1 . (UPLAND) w I / E , / BUTTERNUT I f�m p I 1 �N FEx.Flse / `O Ex. L,_ J�--d �'co ' --- S TR EET L 21 N T --- r — Z 000 9, acres I LO o Co// —23 J L 1 J 1 I CO cn / � o i Ex.Hse Z In O 1I T i I� 0.35 acres W / / /� L=22 J 1 • Ex.c F— 21 —I 3 J OUTLOT Fl •I SHEET 6 ' ' _-_-_� J--J L 20 J D L 22 7 / IZ--� 1 ��h° 19 C; F 5 J F g J w 7 23 / / I>4805.8-19 'E— — — — — Q / 505.2 18 � � 6 � � � g � I F 24 � — — — — — — — — — F-----I � F _ __-_J 0 _-_-_� • I �'w 1 1 g 1 -17 I- 7 -1 F 17 J o� 25 � I---� L_--J L -J 2 L_ --_ Ow A\ 11 12 11 13 11 14 11 15 16 - J N F 8 -1 F 16 J iQ F_ 26— -1 N N 10 II II II II II J L --J L --J L_ — —� �00 / 9 \ J L L g= -115Cn --I-- -- -I 27 �I L - _ I — — — — --- 7 14 - 28 -1 F— 1 1 8 ___ 9 12 130 12 11 I 14 I 11 13 Co o o0 19 7 g L_JL_-1L—JL-_ 15 \ �, OG`I`14 x se I� 2 / / 0 LO I— — — J w — i /� �` 11 8 L- I / z r---� W �_-�--- \� II \� \ \1� \ 7 \\ I 6 vim) 1 7 1 -\ 8 \\ 18 II 17\� 16 \\\ ,�J --�\\ 19 \\ II \\ I- 6 > — / 5 1 Q 1 6 1 1 \\ OGW� 5 L - - J 20 ovR SHEET 8 LROATY D/// / N88019'38"E J --- 5 24 I I 25 \ i \ 4 720.18 r---� --- �_—� 21 i���23\\ L II II II II 4 22I3-LJ 0z \ 2E L56 =�I 1 I---1L_JL_JL_JL—JL—J �a L _ L _�� / /i/ \\��G ��—�i 11 1F_�r_ --- 2 1 o O / 3 // -1 L _ _ N89008 22 E 32 31 3 11 29 i 1 310.91 PARCEL DESCRIPTION _ _ _ That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, - - - - -- 7- lying westerly of the westerly line of Interstate Highway No. 35E. AND The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; except the West 60 feet and also except the South 795.00 feet of the West 822.00 feet. AND I That part of the West 720.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the north 1130.00 feet. AND I That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the north 560.00 feet and easterly of the west 720.00 feet. AND That part of the West 205.00 feet of the East 650.00 feet of the North 560.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the Northern States Power Company ownership through said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter said ownership more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 50 feet in width and being 25 feet in width on each side of a centerline described as follows: I Commencing at a point on the north line of said Northwest Quarter, 1592.7 feet east of the northwest corner thereof, running thence South 52 degrees 27 minutes West, 1987.3 feet to a point on the west line of said Section, 1206 feet South of the northwest corner thereof. Subject to County Road No. 54 on the west and Cedar Street on the north. I AND The North 530 feet of the South 795 feet of the East 762 feet of the West 822.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The westerly 604.18 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. I I I I BENCH I - - RED oAK LANE \ /i 2 3 34 1 33 I - _ 1 - - #2- _7--­IF ,� —�L--�1�—��— ''> .00�- I 1 1 11 2 11 3 11 4 11 5 11 6 11 7 11 8 1 I 9 II \ II 10 89°0 '22"'N I l i 11 1111 1 11 11� - � - - IX — — ' I 1 � I JL_JLJL JL_JL_J JIL1 //% ,; ��/,/ _i 7 L_�L-�L-J � � u � � 22 121111 13 II 14 II 15 1 I I Hs II--� / �� �� \\ 10 11 11 1 / \\ 20 19 18 17 16 15 \ 5 g 1\ I 21 PARK / \\ II II II II II / 14 // \ ,�c� \\ \\ \JI- L-JL-JL-J 1 I 21 1 3.53 acres \\�JL—JL_JL_JL_JI—J �// 13 8 \\ �� 7 20 - 23 i I 1 22\� --I L—� — — \\\ \\ \\ L—JL— ��� J — — J-- 5 - - -- I 1 4 1 3 11 2 // / \\ \ \\ \ — ! 21 ST AVE. S. 23 � �-- �J / ��\ �<\ 25\\�'�,,// II — 18 \\�/ 1 ; I F-- �— `� J --- \�\4 \ 1 26\ 1 13 II 14 II 15 II 6 17 \\ 5,/12 II f e2 24 L � —� � i � \� / � 3 \ \/ � \\ �/ �` \ 11 \\ 0 oo 1 95-4 \\ \\ �/ \\ 10 f I PARK 1 1.36 acres I IZ� L— 17 F 26 -1Q1 —� 1 \ \ I i L — —_J g �— —, L 29 \\ OUTLOT C �� I cn L — L 27 10 / P �' I CO M 0000, SEXHS"1 I L 29 --- 2 7 1 13 14 � Jl / 4 /��ST/� \ // 5 / \ I / BENCHMARK —\ — L J \ / // // / 1 30 6\�� \ 31 / `1 I I I I I I II I � I � II C; II HEET 7 I I I I I I V /I �' < \ // 7 / // \ \ // 2 n 4.43 acres 31 32 1 33 11 34 1 35 1 , v // /11 g < 00000 Q - �L -JL -J -J r W E T L A N D \/10 � ���a SHEET 4 I 76 .01 �a m S89°5 '14"W �JJ= UTLOT � I li _J I I BIRCH _ _ - STREET i I I I SHEET 5 0 O OUTLOT A �\ 00 N6 1 0Cq WET38acres I ' I 1129.09 S89057'14"W 0 12 acres I I / I / I I / I I / I I / I I SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±94.09 AC. TOTAL ROW AREA f15.35 AC. TOTAL OUTLOT AREA ±28.22 AC. TOTAL LOT AREA ±50.52 AC. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 315 PRE -PLAT SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 216 FUTURE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 11 FUTURE MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 88 SMALLEST LOT f5,502 S.F. LARGEST LOT ±21,923 S.F. AVERAGE LOT SIZE ±10,188 S.F. GROSS DENSITY 3.35 UNITS/AC. NET DENSITY 4.01 UNITS/AC. (TOTAL SITE AREA LESS EXEMPTION AREAS) EXEMPTION AREAS ±15.64 AC. WETLAND AREAS ±9.66 AC. CONSERVATION EMNT. (UPLAND) ±0.68 AC. CO. RD. ROW ±0.26 AC. PARK ±5.04 AC. EXISTING ZONING R (RURAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD UTILITIES AVAILABLE MINIMUM HOUSE SETBACK DATA: 65-70 FT. LOTS: FRONT 25 FT. SIDE (GARAGE) 5 FT. SIDE (HOUSE) 10 FT. SIDE CORNER 20 or 25 FT. (SEE SITE PLAN) REAR SETBACK 25 FT. 50 FT. LOTS: FRONT 25 FT. SIDE 5 FT. SIDE CORNER 20 or 25 FT. (SEE SITE PLAN) REAR SETBACK 25 FT. — — — DENOTES EXEMPTION AREA BOUNDARIES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG being 5 feet in width, and adjoining side lot lines and 10 feet in width adjoining rear lot lines and right of way lines unless otherwise indicated on this plat. N Know what's below. Call before you dig. 00 75 150 300 ( IN FEET) o rn �Lr) L-) Lr' M Z W • U) Q) ry) 0 O J Z — O X W W J LL. Uz O C:)W ,� O UMZ Z -_I CC) LLI (L 2 M C) �o 0 M O s W E- Q) Q O -C- oo a N J W a ~ z aW o� o a� Z = J H O J OJ W Z a z W F-I o a--,.zLLnn a r z O .° V _5 O W v7 -a 1 r Ln Q a 00 ao REVISIONS 1. Per City comments. 01/13/14 2. Per City comments. 04/28/14 3. Per City comments. 06/09/14 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: C# DESIGNED BY: TRB ISSUE DATE: 11/08/13 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Thomas R..Balluff Signature: yQ L zk- ? Date: 11/8/13 License #: 40361 3 of 20 m a a lo m an v a Y NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 25, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 0 7 00 or <� OCO 1< \ o,���� POND o a a C� / Edge of water \ / ,--located on 9/03/21 <) gg w c / � � -4. I / a a . BLOCK 1 // a �� / robe Width / (0 J / a 40 LOT 1 1 1 o� l South line of Outlot A,__,' Tvv',4_v, / ',-1/2 inch pipe / NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION S89 57 14 W Broken Cap For the purposes of this plat, the South line of OUTLOT A, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION is assumed to have a bearing of South 89 degrees 57 minutes 14 seconds West. _I, Denotes Found Iron Monument, marked with license number 40361 unless otherwise shown Denotes Right of Access dedicated to the State of Minnesota per the plat of NORTHPOINTE Denotes Wetland location delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services in September of 2021 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: being 5 feet in width, and adjoining side lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 (SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH = 50 FEET KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Lino Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Lino Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 LINO LAKES 72, LLC James E. Illies, Chief Manager STATE OF _ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. by James E. Illies, Chief Manager of Lino (Signed) (Printed) Notary Public, My commission expires I Thomas R. Balluff do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of STATE OF _ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 20 Thomas R. Balluff, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 40361 by Thomas R. Balluff. Notary Public, My commission expires (Signed) (Printed) This plat of NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By: , Mayor COUNTY SURVEYOR By: , Clerk I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this of 20 David M. Zieglmeier Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of , 20 Property Tax Administrator By: , Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES County of Anoka, State of Minnesota day Also, pursuant to I hereby certify that this plat of NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock M. and was duly recorded as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles Deputy CAR LSO N NM M SCAI N ENGINEERING \ SURVEYING \ ENVIRONMENTAL PROPERTYDESCR/P7JON. Per Schedule A of Title Commitment File No. 1598840, with a commitment date of September 13, 2021 at 8:00 A.M., prepared b First American I 1 Title Insurance Company) p p p y // III I I I I I I i! R) '10 Icq 1 I I I Y^ l TP V l T Nddd � ' Outlot A, Northpointe 5th Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota. (abstract property) ALTA/ NSPS LAN D TITLE SLI RVEY j � / < / V/ ^ GENERAL NOTES- fp O U T L OT A v 1) Bearings shown hereon are based on the South line of Outlot A, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION, which is assumed to bear S89 57'14"W. \f��\�' ^ • / 2) Monuments have been found or set at all major corners of the boundary and indicated on this survey. 7 / K 3) Surveyed property address, per title commitment -Vacant Land, Lino Lakes, MN NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION 7 4) Per FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 27003CO370E with on effective date of 1211612015, surveyed property is located in both Zone X, areas of minimal flooding. e��poh Areas determined to be outside 500 year floodplain determined to be outside the 1% and 0.2% annual chance floodploins and Zone AE, area inundated by 1%' annual o5e,, 0. chance flooding, for which BFE's have been determined. A N O K A COUNTY, M I N N E S OT A o�o�a o• ti� / / // \ \ °' / 5) Surveyed property contains ±196,177 sq. ft. (t4.50 acres). 16/ / /� \ \ 1 ' /°' 6) Benchmark - Top nut of hydrant located at Lots 6 and 7, Block 4, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION - Elevation 924.81 ft. (NAVD88) 7) Per Schedule 8, Part II Exceptions of the above listed Title Commitment: Items 1-7 Not survey related and/or not plottable. Q) / / / , ^`V Zone AE O$ Item 8 - Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements in the document recorded October 13, 2014 as Document No. 2092327.005 of Official Records, but deleting 0� any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes or any State Statute or Local Ordinance. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of / / I ' / occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. (The wet/and easement is shown o POND , $ �a / a / / ' fry I l hereon.) Item 9 - Building lines, covenants, conditions, restrictions, dedications, reservations, easements, assessments, liens, charges, terms and provisions in the document \ �e��I �p recorded October 13, 2014 as Document No. 2092327.016 of Official Records, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, \ �oeo9ti� / / etoh9� limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes or any State _ Statute or Local Ordinance. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not ` 1 / yd Edge of water be construed as restrictions based on familial status. (Contains no p/ottab/e easements on the surveyed property and /s not shown hereon. \ \ \ �J / / / / / \ Pose O c \ }\_y located on 9103121 The above declaration has been amended by Document Number(s) 2095687.001, 2129276.004, 2133724.001, 2162367,001, 2188574.001 and 2201481.004. \ f \ \`dj- d (Contains no p/ottOble easements on the surveyed property . Xand is not shown hereon}�� \� Item 10 - Assessments, covenants, conditions, terms, restrictions, easements, and obligations contained in Development Contract between the developer and the City of �� \ J \ \ \ , Lino Lakes, dated August 08, 2014, recorded October 13, 2014, as Document No. 2092327.003, which does not contain a forfeiture or reversionaryclause. --Approx. floodplain line available maps IRestrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, are deleted. \ \ \ (Not survey related) ,\ \ j • PK Item 11 - Assessments, covenants, conditions, terms, restrictions, easements, and obligations contained in Development Contract between the developer and the City of � \ �� Lino Lakes, dated September 22, 2014, recorded October 13, 2014, as Document No. 2092327.011, which does not contain a forfeiture or reversionary clause. Restrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, are deleted. \ _ (Not survey related) Item 12 - Assessments, covenants, conditions, terms, restrictions, easements, and obligations contained in Development Contract between the developer and the City of Lino Lakes, dated September 06, 2016, recorded September 06, 2016, as Document No. 2147778.002, which does not contain a forfeiture or reversionary clause. Restrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, are deleted. (Not survey related) Item 13 -Assessments, covenants, conditions, terms, restrictions, easements, and obligations contained in Development Contract between the developer and the City of � J � L/ V 1 L_ lJ Lino Lakes, dated June 22, 2017, recorded June 22, 2017, as Document No. 2173789.003, which does not contain a forfeiture or reversionary clause. Restrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, are deleted. / /wood sign- (Notsurvey related) 14 Item 14 - An easement for Permanent Trail and Sidewalk Purposes in the document recorded March 16, 2020 as Document No. 2254758.001 of Official Records. (as shown hereon) i / l / I / 1 fo.9- / Item 15 - Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. (No documentation or evidence was providd .J/e 16 Item 16 - Rights of the United States of America and/or the State of Minnesota, the county, the municipality, and the public, in and to that part of the land which X may be within Pond and Wetlands. (The ponds and wet/ands are shown hereon. STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS: O1) Bituminous cul-de-sac, watermain and sanitary sewer stubs along Chestnut Street without benefit of an furnished easement, as shown. 2 2) Wood sign lies approximately 0.9 ft. easterly of the of the east line of the surveyed property, as shown. CERT/F/CAT/ON.- To: INH Property Management Inc.; First American Title Insurance Company. //fp �0 This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for PK ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Table A thereof. The field work was Q /CV / / �[' / / / / l l • completed on November 8, 2021. ' 1`-*1/ // � / � l l l It/ Date of Plat or Map: November 12, 2021 / \P / / l l / / A �J / / / ° l l • Signed: Carlson McCain, Inc. DRAFT Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. °j� Minnesota License No. 40361 / 2 q�p tballuffC�carlsonmccain.com 9 p \Q \ 91�9g10 6 /� °zet 0�� / \ /+�, ?:1��11°9�1 / e 0{ oo SMH 9I / / / \ 1/ 4T 1 t\ d"411 °yea /c/ \ 1 i / l r � FES / POND / / / ✓ / / / ° c6 HYD Zone X I / 9, c"v Nd / / / GV Zone AE � 0 / / / I Approx. floodplain line / / O / / / a) co 3a y t P per available maps d\ / / �• / / / boo I S 1' - d} / d}mo d} d}- d} - o l 9 5 / / ° / / / / •O 441 Sm /'' N8A4040 �916-iiiiiiiiiiRLS 40361 / / ° ``�V Inv .(SW)-917.9$$$U. y � \ 12' RCP Inv.(SumP)=g0 Nis \\ j RLS 40361 / � � / Ell 922- - c1\ f, Cpo -926- 0 \ 3 \ (D. • InT-903.6 / vv \ - (Per built I PK / plan, Fi d Verify) 8 „ PVC - 1 IF 9 - - ` \ �� N I N N N M \ \ / /// o \� 0 -A ° bituminous edge,\ co WETLAND : `0- _____ p --, --- _=--� etland Easement per Doc.-==------------------ - - - - - `� / c� \f ` n iY / / / ' / / ----- \ No. 092327.005 _ / - I fP f9 // Approx. flood lairl�line /� F _ _ _ \ 1 - 0 fp - - / r / �' per a�bl�maps / ✓ ,- . "IN inch pipe 40466 I Broken Cap / I S89°57'14"W N N � I Imo_ South line of Outlbt A, q+ N o NORTHPOINTE 5TH DDITION i ! 1 h / VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) Nl�/ 9 /LI jq I -Red Oak Ln. I I sl City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, MN Section 25, Township 31 N, Range 22 W LEGEND - Denotes Found or Set PK Nail - Denotes Found Iron Monument - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch rebar, marked with RLS 40361 - Denotes Light Pole - Denotes Miscellaneous Sign - Denotes Sanitary Manhole - Denotes Overflow Structure - Denotes Catch Basin - Denotes Flared End Section - Denotes Fire Hydrant - Denotes Gate Valve - Denotes Floodplain line - Denotes Watermain - Denotes Sanitary Sewer - Denotes Storm Sewer - Denotes Right of Access dedicated to the State of Minnesota per the plat of NORTHPOINTE - Denotes Existing Fence as noted - Denotes Concrete Surface - Denotes Bituminous Surface - Denotes Wetlands delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Co. in 2021 Denotes Existing 2 Ft. Contour Denotes Existing 10 Ft. Contour N 0 15 30 60 ( SCALE IN FEET ) J Z W 'V 0 Z f - W Z N IA U Z Z W CC > i U C9 w Z f W t'/) W J N Z m OQ � O U I H / O , N W 0, Ln llt LU 0Z W iz G n w X Zo O V N01 W = Iq M a � n M U1 r Z W W Ce � a cn a W Q J LU O ~ Z C c Q O . a =� J H -1 o O J rra Vl z Z Q W J O a a O W IL J J N � o H a� V' ,--I W �j o M H Lamn a- J V o z tie 0 a) o a O _0 > > U 0 � ce a W N J O V REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: bjs ISSUE DATE: 11/12/21 FILE NO: 2372 Q G� of 1 1`IORTHPOINTE GARDEN ESTATES LINO LAKES, MN I / / / i / / / / STORMWATER a POND (EXISTING) / / / / a / / x / a � / / / Q / / / / / / / / / / / / / a / / / r\ / / / / a � \ \\ \% \\ \ o \\ a n \1 u u ,^ u �J1 a \\ N 1\ \I u \I u u 1 / WETLAND 1� / o / / / \ / i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /.311 / Q / / � w / CO, / L/ / / / / / / / / / VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX C1. COVER C2. EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C3. SITE PLAN C4. UTILITY PLAN C5. GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7. DETAILS C8. DETAILS C9. DETAILS L1. LANDSCAPE PLAN L2. LANDSCAPE PLAN L3. LANDSCAPE PLAN L4. LANDSCAPE PLAN TP1. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 0 20 40 80 (IN FEET) 11 BENCHMARKS TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, ±135 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 21ST AVE SOUTH AND CHESTNUT STREET. ELEVATION = 924.81 (NAVD 88) J Q Z o W 0 U W ZQ Z Z Z L:L, DC f U f Z n Z IW ? Z W Nl W J N m z OQ M O V O LU 3 N W as n Z W O CD oc V LX to a U; o LL V x ~� a O U) w a; co = a M Ch MLu H W H a W Z- 0 W Ine 0 C W ce CC� G O C7 V W� J ZO OJ a r O Z V J J 000 N Ln �z > W Q � L a J Ln O 4-J Z J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C1 of 9 fp LEGEND /_110,'� j \ / % I EXISTING REMOVALS al / _ _ `\ N \ / PROPERTY LINE ♦ ' j \ \/ ( I EASEMENT LINE - / / \ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r SAWCUT & REMOVE BIT. ' \ L---------L L---------- TRAIL AS REQ'D FOR '6/ / CONCRETE PAVEMENT L---- ___L ___ UTILITY CONSTRUCTION d A` // / / a \ 1 / CURB LINE --------- SANITARY SEWER —>--->— AS NOTED STORM SEWER — — —»---M WATER MAIN ---- /� / x FENCE ♦�' / / /� A FLOODPLAIN fp EXISTING Y WETLAND cv POND GATE VALVE HYo Da HYDRANT �S ♦ / ,' / / / MANHOLE O LIGHT POLE SIGN �d==— / / \ ° 2 FT. CONTOUR d --- APPROXIMATE FLOODPLAIN PER /♦�' / / \ d4—�_ / / 10 FT. CONTOUR — FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 27003CO370E WITH EFFECTIVE DATE 12/16/15. REMOVAL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH AND TYPES OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TO NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, APPURTENANCES AND STRUCTURES NOT INDICATED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE CAUSED BY DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THESE ACTIVITIES WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE REMOVALS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SHALL CONFORM/ADHERE TO ALL `// x GOVERNING STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. ALL PERMITS, ) APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROTECT EXISTING / / / / / / CONTRACTOR. / p \ / a // / I RIGHT OF WAY /' rn FENCE / / / 5. ALL SAWCUTS SHALL BE FULL —DEPTH CUTS. / EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTE / a 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS BASED ON ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY CARLSON MCCAIN, INC. DATED 11/12/21. i a�// �7 All �p / s L� EXISTING � / �' /' / / �' POND ' "� d 0, 00 \\ d;—� d}J� d} d} d} � REMOVE TREES AS ,�. ( / / / I ° 1n ? ( 912— REQ'D FOR CONST. I % () 77 ^ -\ i pP y\ /� / \ \ / W � �916� / / / / I / / N \ \ Inv. 911. E.N W' 908.7CP N i ° PROTECT UTILITIES DURING CONST. (TYP.) / — — 922— \I \\ 926— SAWCUT & REMOVE \` BITUMINOUS AS REQ'D — —92& FOR DRIVEWAY & / plan, ,_(Per\ - UTILITY buiV CONNECTION d verity) 0 15 30 60 ivi (IN FEET) \ u EXISTING WETLAND NJ / /_- 11 BUFFER EASEMENT Y % TO BE AMENDED & C., �, I ) // / RESTATED. SEE � � \ SHEET C5 FOR NEW WETLAND BUFFER. / \ A" CALL BEFORE YOU DIG WETLANDfp / ---fp /fP / �/ / ✓ / I ��� \ / / / / / Know what's below. Call before you di J Q 0 Z W f U Z z Z DC i V U DC w f Z W U) W J 0 m J z o� a o U O Z LU �/ rn Ln � N ui 03 Z 03 co w > 4 M n X LU �o <o V Q ago w = 14 rot (A M 0 M LU W H Q z LV Q ra z 4_j J O a W V) oQ) J a > �0 W _�e J W H oC p J a oc O z J J 00 (n M N vLn n �z W Q � L � � a J Ln O r'-1 4--' rl ro H J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: �o-e I Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C2 of 9 0 SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" MINIMUM BEHIND CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE SIGN, POST, HARDWARE, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING (IF REQUIRED). 3. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" SOLID WHITE PAINT. 4. ALL HANDICAP STRIPING, MARKINGS AND CROSS -HATCH SHALL BE 4" SOLID BLUE PAINT. 5. ALL SIGNS SHALL MEET THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) FOR RETRO REFLECTIVITY AND INSTALLATION. SITE DATA PROPOSED ZONING: TOTAL AREA: HARD SURFACE AREA: BUILDING: GARAGE: PAVEMENT: TOTAL: PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: PUD 196,177 SF 36,677 SF 19% 2,332 SF 1% 47,337 SF 24% 86,346 SF 44% 109,831 SF 56% PARKING SUMMARY SIGN SCHEDULE (PER MMUTCD,) HANDICAP PARKING SIGN: R7-8m W/R7-8b (12"x 18") STANDARD SURFACE STALLS 62HANDICAP SURFACE STALLS 2 © NO PARKING SIGN: R8-3a (12"x 18") INTERIOR GARAGE STALLS 72 ��- DETACHED GARAGE STALLS 9 TOTAL STALLS 145 ' 30 j' 10 2 / 1 ' 7 W ' 5 FT. 3 0. 9 CONCRETE ' WALK 6 / Q PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE 1?a 4 STORMWATER / �0 5 FT. U' P ' POND RETE CD WALK (EXISTING) � / %, a PROPOSED 4-STORY 8;� a 72-UNIT APARTMENT \ a BUILDING CIO \ y 7 �. N, 77 ,a 4 13 2 // Rim=915.5 - 911.7 --- \ 12" RCP ' -908.7 - - --- a , 1 ->\i ' Inv.(SumP)- --- \ R -- 5 1,3 3 9 --- ---- --- --- ---- -- N T Yp \ \ _ --- -- ---- ---- \�\ \\�°= 6 �06 SHALL s N R2 0 00 / d RO 9, PRAGE �'0 18 rYp Inv.=9 -.6 ^ 4 �2 \-(Per As -built plan, Field Verify) 9 �� 18 / \ u 15 Q� P IV 1 _ ❑ 9 03 9 3 \ 1 i w ;� WETLAND LEGEND I ' EXISTING PROPOSED I PROPERTY LINE -- e' ' EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 7L---------L CONCRETE WALK CURB LINE SANITARY SEWER - > >- \ x / STORM SEWER »� /a WATER MAIN FENCE x x FLOODPLAIN fp WETLAND --- GATE VALVE x STORMWATER HYDRANT HYD POND MANHOLE O (EXISTING) ° LIGHT POLEX sMH / SIGN u i ° 5 FT. CONCRETE / WALK / / / 1 / / / / 25 ° / / / / / 12 / / / / / / / 1 10 /x k i / // i / / �32.7 i / / / x / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 10 / / 1 / / R15 Rag / Ali / / / / / / " J N / c a / � / 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) ° BENCHMARKS TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, t135 FEET i SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 21ST / AVE SOUTH AND CHESTNUT STREET. / i ELEVATION = 924.81 (NAVD 88) SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. TYPICAL PARKING STALLS ARE 9' X 18', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. TYPICAL DRIVE LANES ARE 25', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL MEET CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. TRUNCATED DOMES ARE NOT REQUIRED. 6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF DISCREPANCIES AND/OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 7. SAWCUT ALL JOINTS WHERE CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE REMOVED. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS, CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND EXPANSION JOINTS IN SLAB ON GRADE, SIDEWALKS AND DRIVES PER THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: CONTROL JOINT MAX. SPACING: WALKS-8' O.C. ALL OTHERS-10' O.C. SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS MINIMUM j CONCRETE THICKNESS. EXPANSION JOINTS MAX. SPACING: WALKS-24. O.C. *ALL OTHERS-40' O.C. *AT ALL POINTS WHERE A CHANGE IN PAVEMENT THICKNESS OCCURS AND/OR WHERE NEW PAVEMENT WILL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT, AN EXPANSION JOINT SHALL BE PROVIDED. DOWEL ALL EXPANSION JOINTS: 24" O.C. MAX. SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 1. LANDSCAPE AREA. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 2. 4" CONCRETE WALK. 3. MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER/SIDEWALK/PAVEMENT. 4. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. 5. LIGHT POLE & BASE (TBD). 6. MONUMENT SIGN (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN). PROVIDE ELECTRIC TO SIGN. 7. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER (TBD). 8. FIRE PIT. 9. 3' TAPER OUT CURB. 10. DOG PARK. 11. 3.5 FT. VINYL COATED CHAIN -LINK FENCE. PROVIDE SINGLE GATE AT CONCRETE SLAB. 12. MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. 13. FLUSH CURB. 14. SCREENED GAZEBO. 15. DRIVE UNDER CANOPY. 16. 5'X8' 4" CONCRETE PAD FOR BENCH. J Q 0 Z W U WZO Z Z Z W DC i U 7 Ix 5: w x Z W U) W J 0 m J z o� Q O U O Z LU t: rn n � N ui Z co w 14 ° Ito w x x Q �i o LL O V gem ci LU14 = a Ni M LU `W r Q W Z Z LU O U-)a o� °C a Q LU C7 \ 0 �••� W _�e (n J ZO FBI C: J a 0 Z J J 00 (n M N v �z LUQ � L � � a J U-) 0r'-14-J rl ro FBI J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C3 of 9 0 48'-12" RCP CL.5 @ 0.50% OCS 116 RE 915.40 IE 911.50-12" SE IE 910.64-12" NW (SEE DETAIL) ,/-12" RCP FES PLACE 2.1 CY RIPRAP CL.3 IE 910.40 `fir IE 911.00 24'-12" RCP STORMWATER CL.5 ® 2.08% POND (EXISTING) i / i / i / i / CBMH 110 / RE 919.50 / IE 914.85-12" N IE 915.67-12" S,E 29'-12" PE ® 0.45% / / CB 111 RE 919.80 / IE 915.80-12" S,N / 86'-12" PE ®0.45% 8" DIP CL.52 / WATER SERVICE / (FIRE & DOMESTIC) 45° & CBMH 112 11.25° / RE 920.00 / BENDS / IE 916.19-12" N,E LOWER WATER BELOW yy STM SWR TO PROVIDE �90)"c301 6 � / 24" SEPARATION AND 5�� 9°INSULATE CROSSING 32'-12" PE a © 0.50% 31'-15" RCP 72'-10" PVC ° CL.5 @ 1.00% SCH.40 @ 1.00% 15' RCP FES \- "? CLEANOUTIE 914.81 STORMWATER PLACE 2.9 CY cY RIPRAP CL.3 \ \\ (EXISTING) IE 911.50 O 38'-10" PVC @ 1.00% PROPOSED 72-UNIT ` s CBMH 101 APARTMENT BUILDING RE 917.93 IE 911.81-15" W,S 27'-6" PVC \ L3\ CONNECT TO EX. 8" P HYDRANT W/G.V. a ^RCP SAN SWR STUB IE 914.09-10" E O 2.0% 8" X 6" TEE IE 911.38 .� W/CLEANOUT CLEANOUT , Rim=915.5 GND. EL. 919.3 \ > 903.6 EX. _-Inv.(SW)=911.8 IE _ - - IE 915.19 ° \ 72" RCP inv(NE,NW)=" * (FIELD VERIFY) - - - - - - - - - °a ° 34'-10" P © 1.0 r 71'-6" PVC ® 2.00% \r \ QP, �/� 72'-6" VC 71'-6" PVC OSEp GARAGE IjEEANOUT 909.42 ti / s PROP 71'-6" PVC SCH.40 O 2.00% 87'-15" PVC CLEANOUT \ IE 910.84 CLEANOUT SCH.40 ®1.00% � 1\ CLEANOUT IE 908.00 \ \ -9 s 45° Per As -built IE 906.58 Ion, Field Verify) 11.2 STMH 102 \ fi , BEN RE 918.53 \\ \ \\ n IE 912.68-15" N `\a Pv<� IE 912.85-12" W,SE �� 98'-10" PVC 52 \\ 7 @ 1.00% � u S„ oV 1 _ 8 UP�-Ck�S�j� 1 22.5° BEND \ CONNECT TO EX. 8" DIP WM STUB W/8" G.V. & BOX & 11.25° BEND (FIELD VERIFY) -- - - -- IE 913.85-12" E / RE 917.63- 1E 913.37-12" NW,E 1 1 1 � 1 \ % 1 l \ L CB 104 RE 917.63 IE 913.90-12" W x I° /xIt 12" RCP FES / / r ° PLACE 2.1 CY RIPRAP CL.3 / 914.00 / / \ 70'-12" RCP CL.5 @ 0.70% / / rr / STMH 106 x RE 921.50 IE 914.49-12" NW IE 915.72-12" S / / a / 46'-12" PE / ® 0.50% / 63'-12" PE / CB 115 RE 919.50 IE 915.90-12" W CB 107 / RE 920.00 ^�1 / IE 916.04-12" S,N i / / x / ° / / 100'-12" PE ® 0.50% i 33'-12" PE ^ /° i 1.00% / / a � CB 114 i RE 920.00 IE 916.68-12" NW i CB 108 / ^'1 ° RE 920.00 j' IE 916.54-12" S,N / / / a ' / J, SE / 92'-12" PE i 0.50% / / / / CB 109 / RE 920.00 i IE 917.00-12" N / / LEANOUT 916.51 a i / / / / a / / / / 0) / / / / / LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK CURB LINE ------ SANITARY SEWER ->--->- >� STORM SEWER >> WATER MAIN FENCE x FLOODPLAIN -fp WETLANDGV --- GATE VALVE x HYDRANT Hvo MANHOLE O LIGHT POLE ytll SMH SIGN UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES STANDARD DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS & THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. 2. A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WATER MAIN AND FORCE MAIN. 3. A MINIMUM OF 2.0 FEET VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. 4. ALL WATER MAIN WORK & TESTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF LINO LAKES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 5. CATCH BASINS IN THE GUTTER LINE SHALL BE SUMPED 0.17'. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 6. ALL WATER MAIN MUST HAVE CONDUCTIVITY TEST, HYDROSTATIC TEST AND BACTERIA TEST BEFORE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE AND TURNED ON. * FINAL LOCATIONS OF BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES & DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND PLUMBING PLANS. STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NEENAH CASTING or EQUAL TYPE & No. SIZE CBMH-101 48" DIA. R-3067-VB STMH-102 48" DIA. R-1733 CBMH-103 48" DIA. R-3067-VB CB-104 24" X 36" R-3067-VB CB-105 24" X 36" R-3067-V STMH-106 48" DIA. R-1733 CB-107 27" DIA. R-4342 CB-108 27" DIA. R-4342 CB-109 27" DIA. R-4342 CBMH-110 48" DIA. R-4342 CB-111 27" DIA. R-4342 CBMH-112 48" DIA. R-4342 CB-113 27" DIA. R-4342 CB-114 27" DIA. R-4342 CB-115 27" DIA. R-4342 OCS-116 48" DIA. SEE DETAIL 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) BENCHMARKS TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, ±135 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 21ST AVE SOUTH AND CHESTNUT STREET. ELEVATION = 924.81 (NAVD 88) J Q 0 Z o W U WZQ Z Z Z DC i UDC w V f Z W U) W 0 J m J z o� a o U O Z LU t: rn n N 03 Z co w > M x � X LU Ix <o C V Q OD w = 14 a M � M LU W Q W Z Z O J W a a o� Q � J LV � J D O M aJ 0 Z J J 00 (n M tD N v P �z W Q � L � � a J U-) 0 r'-1 4-J ,--I fo FBI J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C4 of 9 0 r , i r i 16. } e • / ' � a e <d �d '9 �'• 1 1 d �6 r r 21. / , r EOF ® 20.1 920.1 N / 19. / •// 21 •/ / 1.2 Vie/ .1 21.1 r / r � • o 20.� 21. r fp °.// �2 a 4 21a 9 �Q /•/ EOF @ / 7 921.0 2.2 1.5 914.7 ep /' % / .� / o / 20.1-11 0 210 20. 19.5 P / a� ®• / EXISTING STORMWATER 11-1 1-- / / • / / "1%1-11 / / ZOF ® .9 POND 200P 1� �Q /'9,�99,0 y e.,� / 921.0 / c 21 NWL = 911.5 'R�.kA4Y9° / e / G 21.2 100-YR HWL = 914.3 mJ�SE / �/ • ,� �� / 0 2.0 / a 20.7 / / e/ 21.5 / "� ° / �° co 2; d ° \ / a 401 / Q • ^ 20.0 / EXISTING STORMWATER POND 300P ' I NWL = 914.0 / 100-YR HWL = 915.4 / 4' a rn i `✓�-'' -'' / //� d;tea} ° r / o i 1 5 e PROPOSED BUILDING . djI--- d; d4 d, d}� / • FFE = 922.00 i ° J /� T 20.7 ' s \0 x 1. ° G 20.2 TIP -OUT CURB 18.8 1 d T 2 6 (TYP------) � \ _T 21.8 ° G21.3 T21.8 Rim=91 SILT FEN �g16� • ° - G 21.8 \ \ \ ) nv.(SW)=911. \ �-• _ - - - 19.4 ` d ° T 21 G 20.9 - \ / Inv.(NE,NW)-911. (TYP) ' 18. d 905.7 - e e • ��� G 1.3 Inv.(Sump)= � � � ° ° i \\-�\ --___• �eee•O �20� G21.0 G20.7 \\ \ \ \p I'� � - • ° • ° • °� - � �j 922- _ 8.7 � � / / 94 �\ (� \ (/ \ e • • // /� 924-8 1 G 19.8 21. 21.4 `� 2 \ / \ 19. \� 20.9- t i� 20.9 20.9 d 1 21.0 19. J 1 built ( / p�nn, Fi d Verify) / ? 20.6 \ \ 1 18.61 9� G 20.6� \\ \ < \\\ 8., Pvc�� 19.4 1 20.7 _ q / 20.23. i zA �- V 17. o 1 � / 18.E 18. 9zo �v _---� 19.4 - v 918 u \ .^ u • 1 C' ab 1 � 4' N 18.4 0 1 �. \\ ROCKJ �I I g2`_9� 6\c \�\\ \\\ CONSTRUCTION e I I 922 9?� �7 8 `5 EXIT 19.01 I 92420 9�� ®� \ . ^ 1g22 926 pny . !e e 4 _ _1.. e e 18.1 Sg V • \ \\/ ' 924 92$ / �;`�. �i• e • e o l, 261 918.2 28 g30 /. 7)-'i! e \ N 918 0 g30� • BERM ei o 17.8 �� p�f \/ �/ / i - - - - - - es �� s2p ®�.0 fp �/ \ p/f / / _ / -.� . I PROPOSED °e ; e ,q�2 ti 1 1 / P / / / / �'°. N . WETLAND 0 ° e . KKK"""•••. �. A BUFFER 9 120 • o �� / // / �' --J/. . . . . . . . . `\ se. 9?? - - -- • 00 \ - 922 -T // ✓ a ` I • e ee \�_ 922 r e • e • e N N 00. 0 �� • ° m ° • / LT FENCE / /011 jei TW 924.0` / / r BW 924.0 / 0.5 / TW 927.0 I 2 921.5 / / N /9 .0 / W91.5 20. / / x TW 30.0 / BW 921. / VING VALL / / o`v NN O rn / Q, q, 1.0 T 1 921TW 5.0 BW 921.5/ TW 924.00/ / / FENCE/ / LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - CURB LINE ___________ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L---------J CONCRETE WALK --� STORM SEWER <<- _E� SANITARY SEWER -<<- WATER MAIN FENCE x FLOODPLAIN -fp WETLANDGV --- GATE VALVE x HYDRANT Hv0 T)�' MANHOLE O LIGHT POLE SMH SIGN -� 10' CONTOUR -920 920 2' CONTOUR - 918 - - 918 SPOT ELEVATION CURB ELEVATIONS ( - -.,.., ---E 00.0 ­Q__ x � ARE TO GUTTER LINE) TOP OF CURB ELEV. T 44.3 GUTTER LINE ELEV. G 43.8 E.O. F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 4IN 43 x E� E� 000.0 SILT FENCE ♦ e e e e e- ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD). 3. THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. GRADING NOTES 1. SILT FENCE AND EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND PAVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL OVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE SODDED, SEEDED OR LANDSCAPED. 4. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BEGIN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER GRADING COMPLETION. 5. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER SHALL HAVE MNDOT CATA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND SEED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. N 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) BENCHMARKS TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, ±135 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 21ST AVE SOUTH AND CHESTNUT STREET. ELEVATION = 924.81 (NAVD 88) J a Z W 0 O G' Z f � U Z Z GC i U U w Z W N W 0 J Im J Z o� O U U O LU 1 rn � N ui � a Z w � 0; co � JLUX M �i o LL V f ~0 O N W14 ci = a M M LU W co Q a LU J (D a W Q J Z 0 W O Q) �Z N C z cac Q in 0 . V � LU Z Z J M0 Zo Q 0 J (D W 0 z J J 00 (n M N v tD �z LUQ � L � � a J Ln 0r'-1 4-J ,-� ro M J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: j - /2_' Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C5 of 9 CITY OF LINO LAKES LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 1. CANOPY COVER. THE REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL USES IS 40%. MINIMUM CANOPY COVER REQUIRED = 15,112 SF (37,779 SF VEHICULAR AREA x 40%) MINIMUM CANOPY COVER PROVIDED = 15,275 SF LARGE TREES - INTERIOR PARKING ISLANDS (100%) WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50%) 950 SF (1 TREE x 950 SF) 13,200 SF (22 TREES x 600 SF) MEDIUM TREES - WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (502.)- 750 SF (3 TREES x 250 SF) SMALL TREES - WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50%1 375 SF (3 TREE3 x 125 SF) 2. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM TWO (2) LARGE TREES WITHIN 30 FT OF BUILDING AND SIX (6) LARGE SHRUBS WITHIN 15 FT OF BUILDING PER 100 LF BUILDING PERIMETER. FOUNDATION TREES REQUIRED = 26 (1,294 LF BUILDING PERIMTER) FOUNDATION TREES PROVIDED = 28 (24 LRG. TREES + 8 SM. TREES) FOUNDATION SHRUBS REQUIRED = 78 (1,294 LF BUILDING PERIMETER) FOUNDATION SHRUBS PROVIDED = 194 (143 LRG. SHRUBS + 77 MED. SHRUBS) 3. OPEN AREAS LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM ONE (1) LARGE TREE AND THREE (3) LARGE SHRUBS PER 2000 SF OF OPEN SPACE. OPEN AREA TREES REQUIRED = 55 (109,831 SF OPEN AREA / 2000) OPEN AREA TREES PROVIDED = 67 (57 LRG. TREES + 3 MED. TREES + 16 SM. TREES + 21 EX. 6-12" TREES) OPEN AREA SHRUBS REQUIRED = 165 (109,831 SF OPEN AREA / 2000 x 3) OPEN AREA SHRUBS PROVIDED = 244 (167 LRG. SHRUBS + 116 MED. SHRUBS) 4. BUFFER AND SCREEN. YEAR ROUND CONTINOUS SCREENING IS REQUIRED BETWEEN A PARKING LOT AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR SIDEWALK - 30 IN HEIGHT. ALL CONTINUOUS YEAR ROUND PLANTING SCREENS SHALL REQUIRE AT A MINIMUM A DOUBLE ROW OF PLANTS WITH TRIANGULATED SPACING. SMALL SHRUBS SHALL BE A PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 3' ON CENTER; MEDIUM SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 4' ON CENTER; AND LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 6' ON CENTER. 5. TREE PRESERVATION. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED = 25 TREES REPLACEMENT TREES PROVIDED = 57 TREES f p IRRIGATION REQ UIREDQQ� ��P LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED, PLANTED, OR OTHERWISE LANDSCAPED SHALL BE FULLY QOo ' / / \ / I 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO IRRIGATED. REFER TO LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION START ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND THAT AFFECT n /X_P �A 1 / STORMWATER / POND C (EXISTING) / BL ' -- - --- ' d; L d3 d4d} wP RM 110 — -914— �j.01i 4r \\ 1 �� 4 _ ��\I _924— r — Ciu IF 1j�-11 1 1 sEE SN I S 1 BL a 5 C � �;, � - I I u g10 --A�u — gi28 �—ICJ—��9130— g30 — —1—I—I fP--� — —_ _ --- — / / 3 / / IIIIII-Ili IIiIiIi1- IIi1i1i1i1ilililill O N 1 \ am m THE WORK SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR / \ CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR APPROVING ANY ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED. 2. UTILITY LOCATES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND VERIFYING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW. IN MINNESOTA, CALL GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. ALL LOCATES AND ITEMS NOTED AS 'FIELD VERIFY' ON THE PLANS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE. SB / 3. PERMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3 THAT THE REQUIRED PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER 1 / KC FM / POND START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL z' (EXISTING) a�rn , APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. E2 6 4. EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, SITE CA ♦/ / ' ' "' / / / / AMENITIES, ETC. THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2 — / / / �/ / /�// / i I CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY DAMAGE (AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE) TO EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. d _moa �,,,, l l , , , , , , % (/ 5. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND ACCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SITE ACCESS WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE 7� -- '�"' / ""' / "" / / "" / ' ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS WITHIN AND / — --I — ADJACENT TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. ALL WASTE AND/OR UNUSED MATERIAL SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 6. SITE REMOVALS. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR GENERAL SITE REMOVALS. ALL ITEMS NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ' IMMEDIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, ° -- — N- / UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE WITH OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR i _ ° ANY ITEMS NOTED AS 'REMOVED BY OTHERS' OR 'REMOVE AND SALVAGE.' PD o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 7. UTILITY COORDINATION. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO PROPOSED UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS FOR SITE ELECTRICAL WORK AND SITE LIGHTING. 8. CONSTRUCTION STAKING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING CONTROL POINTS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION FIELD STAKING DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. 9. DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT/WALKWAY, OR OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. /_I o llo IIII oo IIIIIIIIII IIII _IIIII o iI / / / / 10. PLAN QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL —I—I—I _I �°I—I° / I o MATERIAL QUANTITIES PER PLAN. MATERIAL SCHEDULES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY CA ° I = — IIIII° IIII ° — / FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. 11. REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN THIS HL o =— I— II m =I =I o / / / / / / PROJECT ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING ORDER: 1. ADDENDA, WITH THOSE OF A LATER DATE HAVING PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE OF AN EARLIER DATE. 2. LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PLAN DRAWINGS. 4. PLANT / MATERIAL SCHEDULES. �11 ° II —I 5. CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. / — — / — pO I—I�I � x / / � 6. MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. 11 ♦ IIII ° I I I — / / / � I 1 ♦ � o IIIII ° � o° a � a o ° I I I o / IIII III xa / / / �/ I / ♦ � IIIII °1111 °° IjI1Ijl III IIII � / /� 11111 ° ��♦/ __ �I IIIIIII I=— / III i / 1 1 1 1 1 0 2B / III I_ _I II' II o II II —I—I —I—I ° 1a � / o � ill ill ill iil iI ° ♦ ♦ FETE � �°� i I I / / / / ; SEES �♦ / I�Ii �I � �� � / // / / , o KC d l IIII_ 2 FETE IIII / �" � 3 / III Ili I � / III 1 1 III I PROPOSED 4—STORY o0 72—UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING — 0 o JL SB 3 _ 0 � < ♦ �� s d ° 0 IIII III � ♦ �♦ ♦ � �� — IIIIII � � �I/ % / / 920 / ♦ —I—I I— RM —-- III i l l l i w ♦ I — —I � N I _�I�I- � —� ♦ IIIIIIIII3 / ♦ IIIIIIIIII-IIIIII �9 A(o2p-------- KC 2 / IIII / / 0 15 30 60 —�— (IN FEET) / / / /------- -- --- --- — — --- — — / 978� CALL BEFORE YOU DIG / N IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII III IIIIII ---- IIIII III � � � � � / / / 92pIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'IIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII // / — —IIIIII I III—I�I1111111—I—I—I—I—I— / ==920 _ Know what's below. / / / / /% Call before you dig. � Y 9 J Q 0 Z_ W Z U Z LuZ W — Z LLI > 1x i U t9OC� Z i W U) W J N m z OQ � O U or L O I rn � w Z w > OO CO M x � X LLI IL ZO V � t W of CD 2 a Nj so M LIJ W a Z14 W J Z o a wU-) a W IL a� V W � J zo a FBI � J aJ H O Z J J 000 (n M N a� �z W Q � L � J � Ln 0r�l 4-J rt3 H J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name. Ryan 1. Ruttger, RLA Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 L1 of 4 F_\\00 rlO / / / a • 92. 00 0),01 00.°Oo Ooo 0 0o O O0o O W'O'W)''o 0° W'Ooo"Wo 0 0 0 0 00 o O o 0 00 O o / o ° 00 - O -111 _111 -111 III / -111 III 0 0 /-111 _111 -111 III I -111 —IIII ° -III o Vic I — —IIII ° Vic IIII O I =IIII ° III O -III o I -1CC — 1 ic —IIII ° I _I o I —IIII O i I —I —I- - I I —I —I- I —I —I — — —CCo—I—I —I—I Vic I o—I—I —I—I -- II I —I- -- I —I I — I- o _= I o•o — o cu--- -I—I ---- o o°O0 -- - —I—I—I O I —I —I- _ - — 0 O I —I —I- -I —I —I — IIII II 0 0 --- - — — ——I—I IoI o / O 0 1—I- --- -- / 000l IIII o LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT ° D C a D a 0 bc,�c D D zS D 4 a �• I M I , • I. ■ I. • c 711111111111 I III I - IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII [' II�I�I�I�I�I�I�II-� a IIIII x a D D � D D wig NOUN ' k i ,*i fC%�i�l • f A —I o 1-1-1 1—I 1-11—III—I 111 0 0•o oz I—I—I-1-1-1 0 c —I—I—I I 1 °00 0° -1 ill a I—I-1-�-1-1-1-1-1-10 0 0 ° o O o I I I I I I I I I I 6" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) TREE WRAP 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 8 STEEL TEE POST- S REQUIRED AT 120 BAGKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP $ ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. A DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE 501L OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BAGKFILL SOIL INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. BAGKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS CREATE REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 5. PLUMB AND BAGKFILL WITH BAGKFILL SOIL 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 1. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE ,�® SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE _ __ ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. IIIII 6. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF T MIIIII IIIII®IIII II IIIIII IIIIIIII II THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. B CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBIUTY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) I-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP) DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-1' ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MNDOT 3401) A 180* O.G. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE 2 12 UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY 12 LINES AND STAKES STAKING DIAGRAM GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE 4"-6" SHREDDED BARK MULCH EXISTING GRADE _�qII MINIMUM I/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL IIIIII PLANTING 501L MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.) �_,,—UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SUB501L 4 INCHES MULCH ( SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR TYPE OF MULCH ) IF SHRUB 15 B � B, THEN Z 12 REMOVE BURLAP � ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL BAGKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL 1 V NOT TO SCALE _1 J Q Z W CCZxo Z u��i Z > 1x X U t9 0: > Z i W N W J u) m z OQ � O U LU Oor I Ln I\ W Z w > CO � M V Zo O V Wco = M a OD H a z W J z 4_' 0 a W cn W a a� V � � W J z0 a H � J a r O z J J ono (n M a� AN 1 ` � �z W Q � L � J � LI) Or�'4-J rl � H J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name. Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 L2 of 4 L / LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT A r •• wf ;, J / / / / 1 � 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 I I I I i 0 i �l LANDSCAPE PLAN ('3-') LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN ('5-') LANDSCAPE PLAN ("-6 -2')L3 ENLARGEMENT L3 ENLARGEMENT ]L3 ENLARGEMENT L3 ENLARGEMENT L3 I I i LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 5 10 20 (IN FEET) N 0 5 10 20 (IN FEET) J Q 0 Z_ W CC Z f Z W — Z Z > z:U 73 Ix w f W Z U) W J N m Z OQ � O U or L O I rn w z W� > O1 o^ M x W IL 0 zo O V t� W = 14 M a � M LU W H a Z W 14 ra J Z o a wU-) a W IL oe a a� V (' cri W � J zo a J a H O z J J 0000 (n M 110 N a� �z > W Q � L arm a J Ln Or�' 4-J ro Z M J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Ryan 1. Ruttger, RLA Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 B of 4 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER GRASSES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER `lp,, KFG 32 Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Feather Reed Grass #2 Cont. i • RM 7 Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2" Cal. B&B" LBS 33 Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem #2 Cont. • FM 6 Acer x freemanii 'Sienna' Sienna Glen Maple 2" Cal. B&B PDS 22 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #2 Cont. • HL 4 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ' Harve' Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 2" Cal. B&B PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER 0 NEA 22 Aster novae-angliae 'Purple Dome' Purple Dome New England Aster #1 Cont. • KC 6 Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso' Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Cal. B&B 'Moonbeam' OMBC 14 Coreopsis x Moonbeam Coreopsis #1 Cont. � PCF 38 Echinacea purpurea 'Prairie Splendor' Prairie Splendor Coneflower #1 Cont. • WO 4 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" Cal. B&B DLB 67 Hemerocallis x 'Baja' Baja Daylily #1 Cont. Red Flowers • HO 2 Quercus x macdanielii 'Clemons' TM Heritage Oak 2" Cal. B&B DLS 57 Hemerocallis x 'Stella De Oro' Stella De Oro Daylily #1 Cont. Yellow / Gold Flowers • BL 9 Tilia americana 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden 2" Cal. B&B r Liatris spicata ' Kobold ' SGF 52 Spike Gayfeather #1 Cont. Purple Flowers CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WLC 61 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walkers Low' Walkers Low Catmint #1 Cont. p► it BF 10 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6' Ht. B&B "rrnir�`� LRS 19 Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Little Spire' Little Spire Russian Sage #1 Cont. • BH 6 Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6' Ht. B&B BES 55 Rudbeckia fulgida ' Goldsturm' Goldsturm Coneflower #1 Cont. • WP 3 Pinus strobus White Pine 6' Ht. B&B SCS 18 Sedum spectabile Autumn Joy' Stonecrop #1 Cont. GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER Decomposed Granite Kj�\ DG 1,266 sf Decomposed Granite 4" Depth OB 3 Aesculus glabra'JN Select' TM Early Glow Ohio Buckeye 1.5" Cal. B&B Compacted, Non -Woven Geotextile Incidental 00000000000 O 0,0 0, 00 00 O 0 o 0�� Rock Mulch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROCK 6,405 sf 1.5" Trap Rock Mulch 4" Depth 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 = Kr�SB 6 Amelanchier x grandiflora Autumn Brilliance Clump Form, Red Fall Color, 1.5" Cal Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7' Ht. B&B Non -Woven Geotextile Incidental 000 000 000 0000 000; Equivalent SOD 60,261 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod PD 4 Cornus alternifolia ' Wstackman' Pale Yellow Flowers, Maroon Fall Color Golden Shadows Pagoda Dogwood 1.5" Cal. B&B I -I -I Type II - Wet Meadow Seed Mix \ TII 12,626 sf Refer to notes for acceptable seeding MnDOT Seed Mix 34-271 seed methods. Seeding Rate 18.0 Ib/ac Type IV - Native Seed Mix CA 3 Malus x ' Prairifire Prairifire Crabapple 1.. 5" Cal B&B TIV 7,695 sf Refer to notes for acceptable seeding MnDOT Seed Mix 35-241 seed "' ' ' ' ' Red Flowers methods. Seeding Rate 50.0 Ib/ac LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS JL 3 Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' White Flowers Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal. B&B 1. TREE PROTECTION. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR MARKED ON SITE FOR REMOVAL SHALL REMAIN PROTECTED 11. MULCH MATERIAL. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR ROCK MULCH AS INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL MULCH SHALL AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND TO THE DRIP LINE, WITHIN WHICH NO BE CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS, SOIL, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER A SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MATERIAL STORAGE, OR VEHICLE PARKING SHALL BE PERMITTED. TREE PROTECTION FENCING NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (INCIDENTAL) OR OTHER APPROVED WEED BARRIER TO A MINIMUM SETTLED DEPTH OF SHALL BE ERECTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START PER PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4". MULCH SHALL BE HELD BACK FROM PLANT STEMS/TRUNKS A MINIMUM OF 3". WOOD MULCH SHALL BE PLACED BCB 8 Aronia melanocarpa Autumn Magic' Autumn Magic Black Chokeberry #5 Cont. AND SHALL CONSIST OF 4' TALL HEAVY DUTY ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH 6' STEEL FENCE POSTS SPACED 6' AROUND INDIVIDUAL TREES TO A 4' MINIMUM DIAMETER. MULCH SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 48-HOURS OF PLANT O.C. MAX. INSTALLATION. 2. EROSION CONTROL. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP), AND 12. LANDSCAPE EDGING. INSTALL LANDSCAPE EDGING BETWEEN ALL MULCH AREAS AND TURF. EDGING SHALL BE SSC 20 Clethra alnifolia 'Hummingbird' Summersweet #5 Cont. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER BMPS, INCLUDING SILT FENCE, BIO-ROLLS, INLET PROTECTION, EROSION COMMERCIAL GRADE BLACK POLYETHYLENE OR VINYL EDGING, 0.1 INCH THICK BY 5 INCHES DEEP, V-LIPPED BOTTOM, CONTROL BLANKETING, DUST CONTROL, SWEEPING AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HORIZONTALLY GROOVED, 1-INCH ROUND TOP, EXTRUDED IN STANDARD LENGTHS, WITH 9-INCH STEEL ANGLE STAKES. RECEIVE PERMANENT STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE DISTURBED AREA HAS CEASED. IN THE EVENT PERMANENT STABILIZATION CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED 13. IRRIGATION. DESIGN, FURNISH AND INSTALL A COMPLETE UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM FROM APPROVED RTD 25 Cornus sericea 'Alleman's Compact' Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood #5 Cont. WITHIN 7 DAYS, TEMPORARY STABILIZATION BMPS MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 7 DAYS USING. POINTS) -OF -CONNECTION WITHIN THE SITE COVERING ALL TURF AND PLANTING AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. INCLUDES FLOW/PRESSURE TESTING, PLANS WITH DESIGN CALCULATIONS, AS -BUILT DRAWINGS, LABOR, 3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL AREAS INDICATED MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES FOR THE TESTING, ADJUSTING, RETESTING AND READJUSTING AS REQUIRED TO AS BEING DISTURBED OR OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL AND PLACE THE SYSTEM IN AN APPROVED OPERATING CONDITION. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE THE DESIGN AND DBH 19 Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle #5 Cont. DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, STUMPS, BRUSH, GRASS, ROOTS AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL AT AN APPROVED OFF -SITE INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING: PIPING, METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, SPRINKLER HEADS, CABINETS, VALVES DISPOSAL LOCATION. AND VALVE BOXES, CONTROLLERS, CONTROL WIRING, FITTINGS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, QUICK -COUPLERS, ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACCESSORIES, SYSTEM MANUALS, 1-YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD INCLUDING 1 FALL WINTERIZATION AND 1 ABH 22 Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea #5 Cont. 4. SOIL PREPARATION. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY REQUIRED SOIL CORRECTIONS, AMENDMENTS OR SPRING START-UP. IRRIGATION PLANS TO BE PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED IRRIGATION DESIGNER AND SUBMITTED TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (IF APPLICABLE). EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED FROM ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. STOCKPILED IN AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR RE -SPREAD. ALL AREAS WHERE SOIL HAS BEEN COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE SODDED, SEEDED OR PLANTING BED SHALL BE 14. MAINTENANCE. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT NBS 2 Physocarpus opulifolius 'Seward' TM Summer Wine Seward Ninebark #5 Cont. DE -COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES BY SOIL RIPPING, TILLING OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL LOOSENING MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION METHOD. HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE MOWING TRIMMING WATERING FERTILIZING WEED AND PESTICIDE CONTROL MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS 5. TOPSOIL MATERIAL. ALL EXISTING, AMENDED OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT TOPSOIL RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER O LLA 11 Rhododendron x 'Lemon Lights' Lemon Lights Azalea #5 Cont. TYPE A. A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. A SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL MINIMUM 12 INCH DEPTH OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN ALL PLANTING BED AREAS. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE FINE PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. GRADED, RAKED AND DRAGGED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. TOPSOIL GRADES SHALL BE WITHIN .1 FEET OF INDICATED FINISHED GRADE AND SHALL BE TRUE TO GRADIENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS 15. WATERING. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF SEED AND INSTALLATION OF PLANTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A WATERING ^ (l✓` APC 16 Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant #5 Cont. FOR FILTRATION BASIN SOIL REQUIREMENTS. SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS AND TURF AREAS A MINIMUM OF ONCE A WEEK. MORE FREQUENT WATERING MAY BE REQUIRED DURING PERIODS OF HOT, DRY WEATHER. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE 6. SEEDING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. IN THE ABSENCE OF PERMANENT IRRIGATION, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION, TREE GRADES AND TOPSOIL PREP PRIOR TO SEEDING. APPLY 12-12-12 GRANULAR STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 250 WATERING BAGS, OR HAND -WATERING ARE ACCEPTABLE. Spiraea x bumalda ' Goldflame' LBS PER ACRE PRIOR TO SEEDING.. SEEDS SHALL BE SOWED IN 2 PERPENDICULAR PASSES, EACH PASS AT ONE-HALF SPG 30 Gold Foliage, Red Flowers Goldflame Spirea #5 Cont. THE INDICATED RATE, VIA BROADCAST SPREADER, DROP SEEDER OR DRILL SEEDER. FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION, 16. NATIVE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. THIS PROJECT INCLUDES ONE OR MORE NATIVE PLANT SEED MIXES CONSISTING OF A g INSTALL TYPE 3N EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 4: 1. IN ALL OTHER AREAS, APPLY VARIETY OF GRASSES, SEDGES AND FLOWERING FORBS. BECAUSE THESE PLANTS TYPICALLY HAVE A LONGER HYDROMULCH COVER (MUST BE A SEPARATE OPERATION FROM SEEDING) AT A TARGETED DRY WEIGHT RATE OF 3500 GERMINATION PERIOD, A COVER CROP SPECIES IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER AND STABILIZATION. MKL 6 Syringa patula 'Miss Kim' Miss Kim Lilac #5 Cont. LBS PER ACRE. SOIL SHALL BE KEPT MOIST DURING ESTABLISHMENT WITH ADDITIONAL RE -SEEDING AS NECESSARY TO MAINTENANCE OF THESE SEEDED AREAS IS CRITICAL DURING THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS TO ESTABLISH A SUCCESSFUL ACHIEVE A HEALTHY, UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS, FREE OF WEEDS AND WITH COVERAGE EXCEEDING 75% IN ANY 10'x10' NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED / WEED -WHIPPED TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES IN AREA PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. MID-JULY AND EARLY SEPTEMBER DURING THE FIRST 2-3 YEARS OF ESTABLISHMENT. IN ADDITION, ALL NON-NATIVE SPECIES / WEEDS SHALL BE SPOT SPRAYED NO LESS THAN 3 TIMES A YEAR WITH HERBICIDE BY A LICENSED Viburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact' 7. SODDING. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES AND TOPSOIL APPLICATOR. RE -SEEDING AS NECESSARY SHALL OCCUR IN MAY. A NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSIDERED 0 VBC 10 Red Fall Color Bailey's Compact American Cranberry Bush #5 Cont. PREP PRIOR TO SODDING. APPLY 12-12-12 GRANULAR STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 250 LBS PER ACRE PRIOR SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED NO SOONER THAT 3 YEARS AFTER INITIAL SEEDING - ONCE THE COVER CROP HAS BEEN TO SODDING AND ROLL TOPSOIL TO CREATE A UNIFORM SURFACE FOR LAYING SOD. SOD SHALL NOT BE CUT MORE SUFFICIENTLY REPLACED BY NATIVE PLANTS AND THE AREA IS FREE OF ALL NON-NATIVE AND INVASIVE SPECIES. AT THAN 24-HOURS IN ADVANCE OF INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP SOD MOIST FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS THIS TIME, MAINTENANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO MOWING / WEED -WHIPPING TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES ONCE A YEAR EVERGREEN SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SOD UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. IN EARLY SEPTEMBER AND SPOT SPRAYING OF HERBACIDE ONLY AS NEEDED. GVB 75 Buxus x'Green Velvet' Green Velvet Boxwood #5 Cont. 8. PLANT MATERIAL. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," 17. FINAL ACCEPTANCE. UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST FINAL ACCEPTANCE ANSI-Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM OF THE WORK IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF ANY WORK IS FOUND TO BE INCOMPLETE OR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY UNSATISFACTORY IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, A WRITTEN PUNCH LIST WILL BE PREPARED PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. NO SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT LISTING ALL ITEMS THAT REQUIRE COMPLETING OR CORRECTING BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. JSG 21 Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper #5 Cont. MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. WARRANTY. ALL PLANTS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT YEW 24 Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' Tauton Yew #5 Cont. 9. PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS. ALL REQUESTS FOR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING TO THE INCLUDING LABOR AND MATERIAL. OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. 10. PLANT INSTALLATION AND ESTABLISHMENT. REFER TO STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE 'Techny' LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, ARB 2 Thuja occidentalis Techny Arborvitae #5 Cont. TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE. J Q 0 Z Ill U Z f W - Z z Z LU X U C9 1Z > W X Z =) Z z z W N1 W J O m J Z Q o U O 0 LU ~ / 1 44 I W rn ^ z O1 J W > M ^ X LLI � LQL i Zo o V W of CD = M a o ^ MLU H W a Z14 W J Z o a WU-) a W IL oe a a 2: V Ln W � J Z ZO ip J a O Z V J J 00 (n M 110 N a� �z W Q � L � J � Ln O 4-J ,--I ro I -I J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 L4 of 4 C v a t 0 TREE INVENTORY Tag # Tree Size (DBH) Species (Common Name) Condition Located in Basic Use Area Natural Resource Protected Area Designation 990 6 Hawthorn Good No Yes SAVE 991 6 Hawthorn Good No Yes SAVE 992 6 Hawthorn Good No Yes SAVE 993 6 Hawthorn Good No Yes SAVE 994 14 Buroak Good No Yes SAVE 995 7 Black cherry Good No Yes SAVE 996 7 Quaking aspen Good No Yes REMOVE 997 6 Quaking aspen Good No Yes SAVE 998 6 Quaking aspen Poor No Yes REMOVE 999 7 Quaking aspen Poor No Yes REMOVE 1000 8 Common buckthorn Poor No Yes REMOVE 1001 10 American elm Good No Yes REMOVE 1002 8 Quaking aspen Good No Yes REMOVE 1003 8 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1004 10 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1005 4 Blue spruce Good No No REMOVE 1006 8 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1007 3 Blue spruce Good No No REMOVE 1008 5 Blue spruce Good No No REMOVE 1009 3 Scotch pine Poor No No REMOVE 1010 6 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1011 10 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1012 12 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1013 3 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1014 7 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1015 7 Blue spruce Good No No REMOVE 1016 11 Scotch pine Good No No REMOVE 1017 9 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1018 3 Red pine Poor No No REMOVE 1019 4 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1020 4 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1021 10 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1022 10 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1023 10 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1024 10 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1025 10 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1026 12 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1027 8 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1028 8 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1029 9 Red pine Good No No REMOVE 1030 9 Red pine Good No No SAVE 1031 6 Red pine Good No No SAVE 1032 10 Red pine Good No No SAVE 1033 8 Red pine Good No No SAVE 1034 6 Red pine Good No No SAVE 1035 8 Scotch pine Good No No SAVE 1036 3 Blue spruce Good No No SAVE 1037 9 Scotch pine Good No No SAVE 1038 4 Blue spruce Good No No SAVE 1039 7 Box elder Good No No SAVE 1040 9 Green ash Good No No SAVE 1041 24 Green ash Good No No SAVE 1042 10 American elm Dead No No SAVE 1043 24 Cottonwood Good No No SAVE 1'044 1 15 American elm Dead No No SAVE REMOVAL SUMMARY No. of Trees Trees Undersized, Poor/Dead Condition, or Undesirable Species (Exempt from mitigation) 11 Non ESA Trees, 6-12" DBH 19 Trees Located within Natural Resource Protection Area, 6-12" DBH 3 Total Trees Removed 33 Tota I Trees Saved 22 Total Trees 55 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS Replacement Ratio No. of Trees Non ESA Trees, 6-12" DBH 1:1 19 Trees Located within Natural Resource Protection Area, 6-12" DBH 2:1 6 Total Tree Replacement 25 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK CURB LINE ___________ - SANITARY SEWER —>>— > STORM SEWER —>> WATER MAIN UNDERGROUND GAS — u9 u9 — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC e e UNDERGROUND CABLE uc uc UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC "f OVERHEAD UTILITY onu POWER POLE GUY WIRE CABLE PEDESTAL FIBER OPTIC BOX ❑F HYDRANT SAVE REMOVE DECIDOUS TREE *TAG # DBH Species TAG # DBH Species CONIFEROUS TREE TAG # *i DBH Species TAG # DBH Species ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS BASIC USE AREA IIZZ / / / / /r r NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA / / r , fp / i NN Z STORMWATER , POND / o (EXISTING) / df/ d d; d1 912�- 922 y r � \I < u n < 11 1 11 \ u 922 cl/ 924 926 928 0 \p / 3 WETLAND 1 (EXISTING) ; \ ip LP // / / / / I / TR 993 TR 992 fp \ffP / TR 991 o TR 995 A-/ / / /v/ I TR 990 qTR 994 NATURAL RE RICE ----- — — — — %� 1 ` PROTECTION A Jmob z /'/ \ \ ' T 1044 �� �° 'T 1043 1042 1041 / STORMWATER I / / POND 9 / (EXISTING) ate^ T� 1040 0) I TR 1 9 I / T 8 ° dd / l 1 0 >>8 \ / / / TR1 3 \\ a \ T 1 36° \ I /j 035 I 97a 1 34 I I / �033 \i / 1032 I R 10—s1-- I I R 1030 ' 029 ' / �70 1027 0 / 1026 � 025 I I T a 23 / h T / 24 O / / T 1 22 TR ° 1 1931� v�a° r 11/llll; cv � a / / TR 0�6 N I 013 Ali T 11 T 1 10 7 (/ 006 f \ \ / T 1 04 / 1005 / r/ 1 / T 1001 fiR 10 / TR 999 ------------------------------- TR--9-96--- 'TR 997 r / N T 1 03 0 15 30 60 / IN FEET 002 / / CALL BEFORE YOU DIG • 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. J a 0 Z o W Fe f U Z z ZLGC i U UDC w f z W N) W J 0 m J Z oU IX a o OLU Z rn Ln � N ui 01 Z w >40 of CO JW M �% e o X LL ll Uf � ~0 o <� w a; = 14 M a n 00 LU M W a a J a Z LV O Z ra H W O U-) C W a (AW � W H J M a .� OJ W a LU Ce �c O Z J J 00 (n M N vLn P O �z W Q � L � ro a J Ln ICI J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 TP1 of 1 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Total Watts 3 PlA Single 18931 0.900 SLM-LED-I8L-SIL-3-40-70CRI 148.5 445.5 2 P2A Back -Back 18931 0.900 SLM-LED-I8L-SIL-3-40-70CRI 148.5 594 Scale: 1 inch= 30 Ft. 24x36 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Prop Line Illuminance Fc 0.07 0.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. Site Illuminance Fc 2.38 5.5 0.2 11.90 27.50 These drawings are for conceptual use only and are not intended for construction. Fixture runs and quantities should be verified prior to order. Values represented are an approximation generated from manufacturers photometric inhouse or independent lab tests with data supplied by lamp manufacturers. � wCO � s O J r � O LS952-3882-1i ._ J J 0 Q Revisions w � - � Q o O o � N +.. ) II � • • t1) N 3 N N rl r0 U \ CONFIRM DIMENSIONS, INTERNATIONAL SIGN OF ACCESS- 1'-0" (V) SLOPEG RUNNING SLOPE COUNTER- CONFIGURATION, AND IBILITY; TO MEET ALL STATE AND 1:20 MAX_ 1:12 MAX SLOPE COLORS W/ LOCAL FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS ON 1:20 MAX :3 \o GOVERNMENT, AND COLOR, SIZE, AND HEIGHT 0 A.D.A. GUIDELINES > �= -N I'-0� 2"x2"x3-16" STEEL TUBE - PAINT WHEN ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES DO NOT PROVIDE HAND[ PPED PA ING - WALK CURB RAMP STREET �rI A MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 98', ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE uMIT Pau EGIUIRED Z - O `rtr FOR 'VAN ACCESSIBLE' PARKING MUST BE PROVIDED FOR SPACE W/ REQ'D. VERT. CLEARANCE -SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION - - - w U- _ A \` ACC S IBLE O �$ 1 I o 3 FINISH GRADE - SEE SITE PLAN _ _ _ UP To $00 FINE FOR I LATION z F- Z �9 Q N NOTE: __ \ �\ I. SIGNS SHOULD BE PROPERLY CENTERED ON PARKING STALLS. O O O 12 Q� O �� 2. SIGN FACE SHOULD BE LOCATED NO FURTHER THAN 8'-0" FROM F- „\ STALLRW/ MIN F4' 0" CLEAR. REQUIRED TEXTURES „O S. MOUNT SIGN ON COLUMN OR ON CURB RAMPS \ WALL AT LOCATIONS WHERE STEEL TUBE INTERFERES W/ BUILDING. J FLARED SIDE 4. WHERE SIGN IS PLACED IN PAVED 3' AREAS ON PARKING LOTS; 'SEE TO CENTER OF PROVIDE PRECAST WHEEL STOPS nVAN 8„ PARKING SPACE S. WITH A MNONE AVERT.SCLEARANCE OF 48""IBLE" PARKING CE SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR EACH TYPE OF PARKING PROVIDED. FOR PAINT TYPE HANDICAP CURB CUT (TYP) 2 ACCESCASIBLE STALL SYMBOL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. SLE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S. SITE PLAN NUMBER NOTES: I. PROPERTY LINE, VERIFY W/ SURVEY. 2. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE CURB CUT. SEE DETAIL I/A010 AND CIVIL PLANS. 3. ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING STALL W/ 1:48 MAX. SLOPE, SEE DET. 2/A010. 4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE ON POST / BUILDING. SEE DIET. 3/A010. S. 8'-0" WIDE PAINTED HDCP VAN ACCESS AISLE W/ 1:48 MAX. SLOPE. 6. CONCRETE SIDEWALK. SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR CURB EDGE AND SLOPE. 1. PRE -FABRICATED GAZEBO. PROVIDE ELECT. AS REQ'D. VERIFY W/ OWNER. 8. NOT USED 9. MONUMENT SIGN. PROVIDE ELECTRIC AS REQUIRED. SEE PLANS BY SIGN COMPANY. ALLOWANCE BY G.C. 10. VERIFY EXTENTS OF WALKING PATHS t AMENITIES W/ OWNER. TIE INTO EXISTING PATH AS REQ'D. 11. BITUMINOUS TO BE FLUSH W/ CONCRETE SIDEWALK THIS AREA, VERIFY W/ CIVIL DRAWINGS. 12. CURB CUT PER CITY SPECS. VERIFY W/ CIVIL PLANS. 13. GREEN SPACE THIS AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 14. EXISTING FENCE, FIELD VERIFY LOCATION. 15, NEW BITUMINOUS - SEE CIVIL PLANS. 16. CONCRETE STOOP, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS. 11, CHAIN LINK FENCE, VERIFY HEIGHT W/ OWNER. 18. EXISTING PATH, VERIFY LOCATION AND MATERIAL. 19. EASEMENT LINE SHOWN DASHED. VERIFY W/ CIVIL DRAWINGS. 20. PROVIDE GAS FOi, EXTERIORGRILLSWAOWNER REQ D. YIERI Y LOCATIONSLW/BOWNE1z STAMPED CONCRETE. 21. FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING CONNECTION, VERIFY LOCATION W/ FIRE MARSHAL. 22. FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY BOX, VERIFY LOCATION W/ FIRE MARSHAL. 23. CONCRETE CURB t GUTTER, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 24. PAINTED PARKING STRIPES. 25. BUILDING SETBACK LINE SHOWN DASHED. 26. EXISTING POND AREA. 21. RETAINING WALL, VERIFY MATERIAL W/ OWNER AND EXTENTS W/ CIVIL DRAWINGS. 28. WETLAND AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS. 29. 25'-0" WETLAND SETBACK SHOWN DASHED. 30. NOT USED 31. NOT USED 32. CONCRETE GARAGE DOOR APRON. VERIFY SIZE/EXTENTS w/ G.C. 33. NOT USED 34. "NO PARKING" SIGN AT ACCESS AISLE FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS. 35. "NO PARKING" PAINTED ON SURFACE OF MOVE IN CORRIDOR STALL, VERIFY W/ OWNER. 36. LOCATION OF AUTO DOOR OPEN BUTTON ON POST. PROVIDE CLEAR APPROACH AREA BEYOND SWING OF DOOR. UNIT MIX: ONE BEDROOM 3 ONE BEDROOM DEN 10 18% TWO BEDROOM 41 TWO BEDROOM DEN 12 82% TOTAL UNITS 12 12 TOTAL UNITS PROVIDING (2) PARKING STALLS PER UNITS (TYPICAL SENIOR APARTMENT DESIGN) = 144 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 145 TOTAL PARKING STALLS n - A fi A i I I \ 2j \ 9 MONUMENT SIGN \� THIS A 13 1 \ � 1 1 12 I � � 1 \ 25 \ 1 \ 12 1 \ Ii, 13 19 I I EXISTING POND 26 10 0 DOG NF / I1 PARK pgTy / 11 e 18 SCREENED 1 / GAZEBO 13 / f S A/R 19 I6 / 13 10 Jf GARDEN 13 AREA WITH PATHS 13 �v o� M s FIR IT MECH �? _ o car yj Qo/ o `moo 20 10 II / 32 GRILLI Gs DOG AREA I6 / 15 13 WASH 16 PATIO / MECH. ODD SNpP ELE / / 23 I6 SZ CIF \N CORK\Q OMMIJNITY MAIN \ fl NOTE: FITNESS° SCREEN ALL / 2 UND MOUNTED 11/2 STORY G4 �,�32 � / VA IP. 13 COMMONS AREA _ �o 36 �� o = PUB \0 II 2, �� SURF " 5 16 ' 13 16 13 / y GqR CE 13 pRl 4 13 /4Soo 7 NFpST'4��S 4C �pFR C ND 4 II 21 2 6 23 15 / q� pq,�y 3 4 / 36 KIHG STq[ T'4��S _' 13 '0 - 3 21 13 " S 2 _ 24 o = 24 ' " 35 � 24 29 - - ^ 23 15 29 19 � I 19 1 � 3 SETBACKTLAND 1 / SHOWN DASHED / 19 19 25 / 14 ----- - - - -- -- - - ------ - - - - -- ----J / \ I SITE PLAN v SCALE: 1:30 / 19 21 / 9 ■ ■IM■■\ ■:VE■■ ■ NIUM■■ 0 ■Ti■©■I-EELS ■o■e■■■■■■ ■m■■■f■■■■" ■■■R1■1 111113 ■"E■■■� ■m" 1MB■MM� 14 Emma■� All EVEMMERIME[H ■M■0■91m ■ NN MENNEN ■ E■K MINE i ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ moommommom ■■■■■■■■■■ moommommom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ moommommom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■m■■■■■■■■ ■■■E■E■EE■ ■■■■un■m■■ ■r■■oNEAE■ ■pm■n"EVE■ ■■&■H■■E■■ ■■rE■Hon■■ ■b■■m®m■■■ ■mm■"■o■M■ ■o m ■nuurM■ M&FENURVEM ■■FEMd■PM■ ■■■EN■®VE■ ELEMONN&ME ■L■ERHA■■■ owro"mmurm ■■■E■mu■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ moommommom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■o■■■■ ■o■_■un�a�.��tt:J:yy o�.�m ONE b&ARENE ■`\ 411119a " sb■ ■■■■a■■T■■ ■■■■■ABE©■ mommodomom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ moommommom ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■E■■■■■■■ 0_00LAME_.0 ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ckl■■ ■■rnn[ul■■ ■ ■PICIC-4:112,�� ►e■ ■mrima ■wb;v� L• 4m L'_>z■ :■ ■0=13P■Ei■ ■■5• NERV-3rill 1 r-■m■ .. NONE ■MEE LOU■■■■a ■■■■■■■■■■ ����gillll ■■■■■■■■■■ CmEMEME■■■ ■iiirii 1'5' THN BRC SHINGLES 1• CORNER TRIM e' HORIZONTAL LAP BIDING — OVERALL MATERIAL SIDING 8U S.F. 0.15% MASONRY 418 S.F. U.25% TOTAL 1,314 S.F. 100% MATERIAL % REAR ELEVATION TOTAL 198 S.F. 100% SCALE: I/e" = I'-O" 24' DIAMETER VERTICAL DECORATIVE SIDING LOUVER END ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" MATERIAL % SIDING 98 S.P. 915% MASONRY LL S.P. 0.257 TOTAL I IN S.F. 100% ASPHALT SHINGLES C FASCIA _ -- - - -- wfT, ---- ----_- -\ -- --_ _�- -v T.O.PLT. IO8'-O' RZ$➢ CORNER TRIM DOOR MATERIAL % SIDING 258 S.P. 1 1 .15% HASONRY 1 94 S.F. 1 205% TOTAL 1 352 S.F. 1 100% 1' STONE CAP TO BRCK VENEER FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\ H II'-2" II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" IlrlO" � w rc D ` / O.H.D. I 19'-O'KI'-O' O.H.D. 1 1 T-0'0-0' D.H.D. i i 9'-0'aq'-0' O.HD. a , I /'\ A ♦\ W O II'-O" II'-O" II'-O" 106'-0" FLOOR PLAN 9 STALLS SCALE: 1/8" = I'-O" T. 1. ER f 8TM CAP TO BRDC VEIEE IR N 0 0 0 u, 156'-8" ELEV "A" FITNESS ROOM 4 w GAME ROOM ------------------------------------------------------------ c� VEST - c DRIVE UNDER ---' cv CANOPY ---------------------------- COMMUNITY ROOM -------- ---- of __VAULTED__CEILING — ~' i Cam! W OFFICE STORAGE PACKAGE STORAGE v ® ® MAINT. MAIL ' OFFICE ----- - , � � ELEV. z. SALON COFFEE / PUB AREA Y, p BIKE STORAGE FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" MWAU 6 F4 4 0 HVAC iI HVAC 0 BIN 32 TOTAL PARKING STALLS ' I I ---------------------- ----------------- AN ' ELEV 'T ------------ 13 40 TOTAL PARKING STALLS --------------------------------- - ELEV "E"---------------- 20 I'-4n 113'-I 21/32" ELEV "G" 14 w 9-' m mommmmmmm Emmommomm mmEmommom commommomm L 252'-8" Ile 225'-1 11/32" 0'-11 11/32" A �NI UNIT A.2$$ ONE BEDROOM DEN ,4 U N IIII A. ;�-_ ONE BEDROOM DEN of i d.. THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3 2" = 1'-0" "UNIT "CT' ,'TWO BEDR00 s f, ff UNIT F TWO BEDROOM N cn Lo i C1! ,LN rra � BEDROOM DEN = h-1( P `7r=ter, r NIT TWO BEDROOM'' ■ lilt -y 1 II ' I,I I II II II I Ili I II II 1 II II II 4 �18 ■ ELEV I lj !-;- T ---------'IIIIIrjIIl�� -- -___�1IIIIII 'LIIi�IlgIamI`-----T-TIt„,IwIII^IIIIIIII�III�II -_--�J'II4IIIIII'�I,II lIiRi,�pIt�_---_,�,.lIIiiIIIwllIIII IIII� ^I'I --I I r ---- __1 -------'-'li _IIIII r -- UNIT "C.1" -- --J UNIT "C.1" ----------- TWO BEDROOM TWO BEDROOM FT o q 7 ----- ----- - - - ----- - ' UNIT ' E ' ------ .' I -. I � I I Z"-_- T3WO BEDROOM DEN � I I I DII�II� C01 --'I IT IT -----__ ,I I III I L-_ --J I •JI 1 UNIT -----;--- f� TWO BEDROOM ME f »° 0 f O 0 UN T; A.JA HVAC-_r ! '- w ONE �Ei6OM �Pk,'r , ���,,' STORAGE ------------- UNIT "B" - TWO BEDROOM ----- -- UNI T C TWO BEDROOM --------- ,m -- hi - IIII --, I ' ------- ------------- SCREEN I' I �° -ylll IIII , I 1 I ll II •_�I, y�_,II 11 Ili ' -, ✓> IIL �, ,, I III I I I Ili I I 1 I 'I ��- I -I ' � I I I 11 III IIIIi gill iI' �,•, Ir,l ✓✓ ---, I�---; � I _ _ �Ir;III ;---, Ili l •- ` III; VhgN w , 1. i' ..'r_ <` � ``\� `\�`` `� ,D __•----ii--L `__ • II I I ' IIII �_ I __� I I L I I µ---J III L �I I ` III II •'�� ` n � /. , � • ` _ _ _ II'.�--i� III I I � I SCREEN SCREEN ELEV 'ILI' '-5 21/32" UNIT MIX Lu UNIT TYPE 2ND FLR. 3RD FLR. 4TH FLR, TOTAL BALCONY 5.1=. % BY TYPE Q "A" (I BED) 2 - 2 X S.1=. (I BATH) g"AY' (I BED) 1 - - 1 X -792 S.F. (3> n "A.2" (I BED) BATH-DEN) 2 2 2 6 X �40 5.1=. Q in Lu "A.2A" (1 BED) - 2 2 4 X 941 S.F_ (10) (I BATH -DEN) "B" (2 BED) I 2 2 s X 990 S.1=. (I BATH) (2 BED) 4 4 4 12 X 1,080 S.F. (2 BATH) "C.I" (2 BED) 6 6 18 X 1,138 (2 BATH) I'D" (2 BED) 4 4 4 12 X 1,095 S.F. (4�) (I BATH) 2 2 2 6 X 1,202 S.{=. o (2 BATH -DEN) "F11 (2 BED) 2 2 2 6 X 284 S.F. (12) ~ (2 BATH -DEN) 11% TOTAL 24 24 24 -12 100% AN R-2 OCCUPANCY REQUIRES 2% TYPE "A" UNITS 72 TOTAL UNITS REQUIRE 2 TYPE "A" UNITS THE REST MUST BE TYPE "B" UNITS ■ ■ n L - ----- UNIT "D" -„ TWO BEDROOM I y I - ___, --11----- IILI 113-1 21/32" t ELEV "G" SCREEN SCREEN SCREEN -- SCREEN hK _ — ---_ li iii r. o' r r' III 11 , iI I I III III I I li ' Ili i Ili i I II, I I i II III ' i91 rr Ii III Ili l; ull II III jll ,I �I PI IIII ;; II u_�I I�_,II ll Bill d I I n_�I I�_,II ii u 1 1� I _ ✓ II II 1 I I I _J 1-- - , II ' , I li lip , I Illli il'ii I i II I` II I I L I --ill ilI`I` LII II___� -'w'-_______ --- I li I�lli I i I I UNIT „B-- --J UNIT „C" �-- --J UNIT „C" I\-- --� � �> 1 - TWO BEDROOM TWO BEDROOM BEDROOM ------ ------------------- _- ,' I I ,' I I STORAGE I I I I I I I HVAC r,<r' v O r>£✓' :,� O I r>£' :' 0 0 U >< A. 2 A NE f: QOM DEN IQ% I II - I i h---III ✓ I III UNIT "D" .--- TWO BEDROOM ■ 911 0 P UNIT '- i n„1C. UNIT C.1 'NIT BEDROOM DEN I LF TWO BEDRO0M _- - TWO BEDROO--- °b UNIT „C„ UNIT D ' I TWO O BEDROOM EDi I i ROO'rMTWO BEDROOMy -=-m------- --------m-==, m,---- ------------- I.------ _ ,I II II II II i I V I I ✓ I ✓ ✓ II I I - I I 4' Inll I 'II I ,I � o; Jn II III ' I la I, In II n 11 yI IIII I I ' I II I I n� 'I III III r---I --• 'li VI III I I II I I ,I I I III III VI III I I II I rlI � — n , I `ii ✓ --- n---, I ✓ --- n---, I II Ili :E��`I 11 ,Ac I I I I II I u o o — I' II I I I I I I I I I I II ' ' I I III 11 III I I, ll I I ,I I it \ I II 'I, I I II II 11 I 11 11 � I tt 11 I 11 I I I IIII , I 1 il✓ __ I L— I `__ , I i `__ __� ___ L---'II II 1 i i i '\y" I 4 Ill L-_iL -- -- -- -- SCREEN ELEV 'i 1, 1 O i N N 0 0 N L;_i J L� N I N I N 0 LJJ 0 _J in Iisug W %T-3 11/32" 68'—II II/32" 225'-1 11/32" 156'-8" `y i UNIT )) A. 2" OO ONE BEDROOM DEN UNIT A. ;:�._ ONE BEDROOM DEN dJ. FOURTH FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/ 2" = 1'-0" m JAC 'DRAG IF 0N-V �JNIT "C.1�' TWO BEDROOM 1 z_ u " UNIT 77 F77 TWO BEDROOM L\T_A\_; 0 A�F, NPT ; ,,7 F77 ae� BEDROOM DEN 'A C UNIT "C.I TWO BEDR00 r r ELEV "A" lief--+ II I�--y�ll Rill II �\ I I II h___y II I III I II ICI I I,II III_, � IIII I 11 I II III 11 ' I __ � IIII IIII Il li_�Ili 'II`_III lls I J y___J I I I I �_ I I I I — II I _ _ '�`I�1/______L�_1I�ILII I' I`=J�III III` ILLS_ LI.Lu ______I`I�Iw -- UNIT C.1 0 BEDROOM UNIT „ E„ - ----- --- --- -"TWO BEDROOM DEN Oil r-r HVAC STORAGE 411 WIIN= Il ---i II II II ___TT__"L--'I r-----ii---- I I 'S V . II I I ' III II I I I I III „ II, (IIII II __ 11 _J I III I I II,I ' L`-----=-w'-� UNIT "D' --- �, -------, -- TWO BEDROOM UNIT "C.1" I TWO BEDROOM--- Lmod FNI III MEN LRE, NE OM DE_ •-..TWO BEDROOM UNIT "B" �. ` \ � III I Rill 1•=1—I ' I —I— ' I �I'Il�ll'� ELEV "L" '-5 21/32" UNIT MIX LO Lu UNIT 2ND 3RD -I TOTAL BALCONY S.F. % BY U TYPE FLR. FLR. FLR. TYPE Q (I BED) 2 - 2 X 83� S.F. (I BATH) g (I BED) I - - I X -792 S.F. (3) N (1 BED) (I BATH -DEN) 2 2 2 6 X �40 S.F. Q In m 1'A.2A'I (I BED) - 2 2 4 X 941 S.F. (10) C" (I BATH -DEN) 14% "B" (2 BED) 1 2 2 5 X 990 S.F. (I BATH) "C" (2 BED) 14 .412 X 1,080 S.F. (2 BATH) "CY' (2 BED) 6 18 X 1,138 S.F. So (2 BATH) I'D" (2 BED) 4 44 12 X 1,0`15 S.F. (4-1) (I BATH) 65% n 2 2 2 X 1,202 S.F. o (1211 BATH -DEN) 3 "F" (2 BED) 2 2 2 X 1,284 S.F. (12) ~ (2 BATH- EN) 1 TOTAL 24 24 24 72 100% AN R-2 OCCUPANCY REQUIRES 2% TYPE "A" UNITS 72 TOTAL UNITS REQUIRE 2 TYPE "A" UNITS THE REST MUST BE TYPE "B" UNITS II I _________ I� II I 3 � I I I . o :------ ElvmmiI--- i : �ILLL_j - UNIT "D" TWO BEDROOM �_- II I __ IIII II I' I I I IIII II I I '� r\ ---'illy ______ II I d, III II II O 113'-1 21/32" a < r ELEV "G" S__ C,IIIII'i REI EN IIII 76 liIIIi'InliII ICI'IIII o' LZ�,_ —�� SCREENSCR ENCREENSSCREEN 77 IIRill I Ili till II Rill 1 III ' IIIIII II,, /. `--- J IIII III, ;, I ;, III lil lil IIi IiI `--- III !'I Illi Ill ills i ;' li' III--, \✓ i r: f�-7>V ,1' 'V I yl _ I IIII III �.,[_f .�.,I I I I 1 1 I ,�'C�� 1><�✓� r� i ' I III II I , II III Ili L__lll l` ----------- _ ------ __Imow_ = �wI'-,I- _____`I----_11II'l -__ _ —_______ UNIT7C UNIT CUNIT B $ I UNIT D T M M TWO TWO BEDROOM _______ ____ ______ ___ _ _ _ __ ___ WO BEDR00 TWO BEDROOM BEDROOM `_ i -• ------------ „ HVAC ` STORAGEf In c \, I Um- T� I I V A 2 A �J: p ri6mp p ONE0 DEN qDN REFU r---------� I I Qo ° QO I O O Q Q--_ _ 4S1 _ O �] Q O-------- - Q O ---- 10 ---- on ' I Go ✓ I I I I I O ■ O � UNIT E - - h ----- ----- I e TWO BEDROOM DEN =____ ----- I- 77 ,7 ----- - ------ 4- = IT ' C. 1-------' --- U ,17 _" `_"UNIT C.1-------� � k y _-y y �UN NIT ' D" p 'w TWO BEDROOM UNIT C _____ < - - -- - TWO BEDROOM - - TWO BEDROOM � _ ___ r__ __ _ ___, __�,m,___ TWO BEDROOM r r�li - , --- I III I r --,i -------�,m ---�' IIi i ------�----y II I ---- `-- __ I,I InI Il-------�ml I- -,�I11 I - J ,mho ______,19-- li i,Il , M I r If I> III IIIIII------ ---I i--- I I ___ I rl fI - _______IIPh------I %mli I I I I ,i Rill l`III I, '`Il-i -, _ `iI -----1y1III III ----III IIII II +IIIIIIII _ __�III IIIIIIIIIIIIIII -;III .I I`_ - RI! `-J __---- lidJ -- A\, - - SCREEN ELEV "E" 262'-3 II/32" 0 U a_ 0 N LJJ J N N i N 0 LJJ 0 J in W Iisug Emmocammmm mmm 1M 1E 1N nl III �ull N� �IVI III ,h lallllllll,llilllll� nlllllul�nlllllull alllllul�nlllllull �— nlIII111 IO 111111 111111 — If MOO Lill I F — 111 111' 111,. ®. 111 I■ ■■■II III IIIIII __���., II III IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII ■. ELM, (IIIIII (IIIIIIIIIII IIII (IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIII IIII �3 --t Cii ■ -; iiC iii CiC ' iii iiCll, iii iii' iii Ill oil iii ■ �■■■® Iliuuillr uilluiln ■■ winuliu �■■■r■� �— 6n1 Illllwllli �� I6ii1 IIIIIIIIIII Iliillllllll illl IIII - I� III = III ICI III = �=11l11ll Ill1111 = III ICI I=� _III III III III III �I�I IIII= _ICI III III ■ =■■■=Il77 wmarl=■■ IunuulauliliI=■■■E I■■ Iw>lu77IIIliilI=■■■ ■ ■I-11111 III IIIIII IIIIII 1 _c___3 _c<■ ■o- __�-�_=1�1■ ■ ■1=1 ul 77 nul, I����i■ ■-��_���-=1 ulul Inn ICI lu 1=1■ ■ ■lil----'-■ ■--��=����ai-ul�ll I�I!�I-ICI I�u1=1■ ■ ®■E1 ®I� 1 �1��� � ■■Ilil-ill II � I = lilllllllllll IIIIII III millll I IIIII((IIII Ili I C m n IlmI ^gym I� IIIIIIIIIII III ��®w--CW �® C IIIIIIIIIIII W IIIIIIIIIII�� __ IIIIIIIIIIII IIII � IIIIIIIIIIII IIII _ -�� -- I 11M lllll� I I ,In == �ill�I r (IIIIII lr`l;•\ IIIIII—=III III III= — IIIIII IIIIII= 111 111 — —III III III - 1m1 1�1 111 111 = ■ ■ = I ■ ■ ■ = u' 11I I I1111 ■ ■ _ -- = —min==minw=7mu __ __ _ _ 71!11 _______-----_-_ -■ ■ __������_____� �����_-___=�����_=__--=,��� om ■-_�■ _ _ = ■ �I _ I ■IIIasammIsm = =-1�I �,Ilallllllllli�illlllllluul� - III 111 111 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,� ■ ■ mw min ' ■ lnm fG�1mmn1 mm IIIIIIIIIII 11914UPI ■ ■ ■ IN► I 1 I 1 I 1 1®®1 1 1 11 110M®I 1 1 ■ ■ 111 III III milli1111110/1111111 IIIIII III III IIIm IIII 111 Z III III ��111 II1111� 0111111 �111111� IIIIII 111 111111�111 III IIII �C III III IIIIII-III OI 111=-QII�I III. _III IIII-111 III IOC �C111111 �1111110 I1�1 IO OMENS �■■■N III IIIIII IIIIII ■■��■■■� III IlillI IIIIII■■��■■■� IIII min IIIIII■■� LIIIIII III II iliiiilliiilli rKir _ -- 1:m1om.mm m I____=m m m _____________�_ m======-_==_______ m m m m m _�====____:m m 10 m m m m =__ _ __wnI ______m w mm m __�_r_=I �n n �ulluTlll =_1■■=_unwm— jlliuilliili lllljllllllllllll Ill, lllllll lllllllllllli — _ ___-- a _- �-- __ == =_ == = __ == =_ == === ___ == _= - = = ==== == = ======___= _ = __ e ___ _ ___ ___ __ ___ _?: _= == _ - _=_ _ _- -gym m �= __= � _= == =, � _= =:III I11 _g`- III _ ■ _ oe== �_-__= - _ =III III _ _�' _ __sue_??_-s_-- v=ul III ea?? ______ =____ =:III III e= ■=== - _ ===e o_== =_= __====■■=== =_ = === ==_-■■ -== _===_____=== ■■ _ = =_ __ ____ __ ____ ___ — �_ -- _ -- _ _o= -=_ _-_ ___— -= CIM =_ ___ � —_� e�_�-- _ _ -- _-_ -- —_- — _ — --- -__ _=-s-e__= _------------------ —_ --__-. ELEVATIONIiG7 �EAT ER IAL % � CPlFi)•1F S.F. 0,115% 5.F. TOTAL 11% � • •• au�ullllllllll.InlllllPl �alllluu�, _ lllllllllllllllllliiuul ��•' ill LII , •�risn� fitS.F. 1001 —� - lug �alllllul � nlll�n�n�llllul _ = v Will Yn In - 111 111 111 lit =, =_ _ nn m 111111111 n llll llllllllllll = llllllllllll lllllll = -- lllllillllll lllllll ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ IIL_,,_IIIIIIIIIIII ;min �n(�nl— �Y snllf �n m=- �nlm mm mmnr 3� IO Iq � III Illi� It. 911111 ^ ^ � III III III 111 III III III fin', �rlulllun =■■I_ mlC �■� ;■■ ■■ ■■■— IIIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIL, _, mm mm mm' ■■ ` ■ mmm m mm ■. ■, IIIIII lu r III 111 III IL III . Ili —Emmm, Ili— ,mm mml lienm i _ � 1 � � � �,WI IIIIII � ��■, r,11��������,���������� III IIIIII III i- Io-IR 111--III IIIIII= �III IIII -111 111—_=_III IIIIII==1�11�1 =1I1 ■-_■■■- III_I IIIJImnun =■ IIIt��lll lil lll� 77171771 111 ��III III 111� ��_ �__n_ O ■ � _ ■ ■ ■ _nl - - _I _. II II � ,IIIIIII AIIIIIIIP� _ eluJ uu �uu = .. IIIIII 61, 111Q �1lf nll Yi. HIM ■■I �IIIIIIIIInIIIIII��■■� — ■■� 111111111111 IIII IIIIII111111� 1111111E a 111 lll�lll lll�llllll IO.111 � III III �_' 7I1111 III IIII t110111111D=111. 111 ■■I= mmm ■■■ _ ■■p■■p■■ � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� ■ ■. m nl I.IIlllIn1�l 1I�n �III mM _ ME' t ■ ■ I ■ liu im a1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: Katie Larsen, City Planner January 12, 2022 Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat FP2021-007 TJB Homes, Inc. Attn: Tom Budzynski 9100 Baltimore Street NE Blaine, MN 55449 OWNER: CB Property, LLC Attn: John Commers 285 Grande Way Apt. #501 Naples, FL 34110 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: December 16, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: February 14, 2022 120-Day Review Deadline: April 15, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 12, 2022 City Council Work Session: February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting: February 14, 2022 BACKGROUND The applicant, Tom Budzynski of TJB Homes, Inc, submitted a land use application for final plat. The applicant proposes to subdivide 2 existing parcels into four, 10 acre rural lots for the purpose of constructing four (4) new single family homes. The subject site is located east of Amelia Lake and is 40.85 gross acres as measured above the OHWL. The name of the final plat is Lake Amelia Woods. This staff report is based on the following information: oo Preliminary Plat Plan Set prepared by Acre Land Surveying revision date 12/8/2021 oo Preliminary Plans for Grading prepared by Civil Methods, Inc. revision date 12/3/2021 oo Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Midwest Natural Resources revision date 12/8/2021 oo Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Civil Methods Inc. dated 6/18/2020 oo Final Plat prepared by Acre Land Surveying received 12/13/2021 Previous Council approvals: oo November 8, 2021: Resolution No. 21-114 Approving Preliminary Plat This staff report provides a comparison of the approved preliminary plat and the proposed final plat. Changes in the plans are either narratively described or shown as s#ikethr-eugh (deletions) or underline (additions). Overall, the final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat. Existing Site Conditions The 40 acre site is currently vacant, natural open space. Per the MLCCS, land cover includes cattail marsh, deciduous woodlands, oak forest and tall grasslands. It is in the shoreland district of Amelia Lake. Topography contour elevations range from 908.1 OHWL to 930 along CSAH 54 and from 900 on the south end to 950 on the north end. A previously submitted Existing Slopes and Hydrology plan sheet indicating some slopes exceeding 20% on site. No development is proposed in these areas. The property width tapers from approximately 1,000 feet (north) to 200 feet (south). The property length along CSAH 54 is approximately 3,000 feet. A 66 foot wide utility transmission easement with overhead power lines bisects the parcel north to south. Groundwater was encountered at 4 — 19 ft. Wetlands exist on site. Zoning The subject site is zoned R-X, Rural Executive. One single family detached dwelling is allowed per 10 acre parcel. Current Zoning R-X, Rural Executive Current Land Use Vacant Rural Residential 2040 Land Use Plan Urban Reserve Utility Staging Area Post 2040 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North R-X Rural Residential Urban Reserve South R-X Rural Residential Permanent Rural East R-X I-35E 1-35E West R-X Amelia Lake Amelia Lake Density and Land Area Calculations Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the subject site is guided Urban Reserve and the land is preserved for post-2040 development. Land use prior to 2040 is limited to agricultural related uses and single family residential limited to 1 unit per 10 acres. The proposed development of 1 unit per 10 acres is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Zoning Requirements The subject site is zoned R-X, Rural Executive. It is 40.85 gross acres as measured above the OHWL 908.1 EL. Four (4) lots are being created for the purpose of constructing one (1) single family home per lot. The site is also subject to requirements of the Shoreland Management Overlay District. Amelia Lake is classified as a Natural Environment Lake. EEL Shoreland and R-X Requirements Lots 1-4 Lake Amelia L Woods Min. Lot Size' 10 acres 10.07-10.55 acres Min. Contiguous Acres 2 acres 6.14-9.55 acres Min. Lot Width 330 ft 540-1,000 ft Min. Lot Depth NA NA Building Setback (feet) -From Collector Streets (CSAH 54) 40 ft 150-500 ft -From OHWL --Principal 150 ft 150 ft -Accessory, 150 ft 150 ft -Side Yard --Principal loft 20-200 ft --Accessory 5 ft 150 ft Impervious Surface 30% 5.2-5.9% 'Only land above the OHWL can be used to meet the lot size standards 2Lot width standards are met at both the OHWL setback line and the front building setback line 3One water -oriented accessory structure may be setback 75 feet from the OHWL and outside the wetland buffer 4Per Shoreland Management Overlay District The lots will have limited ability to construct accessory structures, decks or additions due to the required OHWL setback, topography and wetland buffers. This shall e is noted on the preliminary plat and shall be noted on the certificate of survey submitted with each building permit. In an R-X zoning district, a detached accessory structure is allowed at least 100 ft from the CSAH 54/201h Avenue road right-of-way. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family homes will be reviewed for compliance regarding floor area, garage, design and construction standards and septic system design. Subdivision Ordinance Per City Code Section 1001.076(1), a subdivision which results in three or fewer unsewered residential parcels, tracts or lots from one or two existing parcels, tracts or lots, within unsewered residential areas of the city is a minor subdivision. A subdivision that results in more than three lots from one or two existing lots shall be platted. Four (4) unsewered residential parcels are proposed; therefore, a preliminary and final plat are required. Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat and final plat are consistent with the comprehensive plan for urban reserve development and zoning code requirements for R-X, Rural Executive as discussed above. Blocks and Lots The preliminary plat and final plat contain Lots 1-4, Block 1, Lake Amelia Woods. Ghost Plat al Per City Code Section 1007.042(2)(d), all subdivisions in areas without public sanitary sewer shall be designed such that the larger non-sewered lots can be resubdivided to provide smaller sewered lots when sewer becomes available in the future. Homes and accessory buildings shall be located on these lots so as to allow for future resubdivisions. This is also supported by City Code Section 1007.081(2)(d). The applicant submitted Sheet S4, Ghost Plat showing future resubdivisions of the 4 lots. Further subdivision of these lots will require public sanitary sewer and water. The ghost plat sha44 has been revised to reflect street right-of-way extending north to parcel PID #35-31-22-12-0001 and utility easements. The house on Lot 1 slel meets a 30ft setback from the ghost plat street right-of-way. It should also be noted the City's review and comments on the ghost plat do not grant any rights to develop the property as depicted on the ghost plat. Streets and Alleys All 4 lots are served by CSAH 54/201h Avenue which is an A -Minor Reliever. Street right-of-way 60 ft wide from centerline is required and provided on the preliminary plat. The A -Minor Reliever road has capacity for 4 additional lots. The private driveway for 6351 201h Avenue encroaches south onto the subject site approximately 24 ft. A 24 ft wide Private Tngr-ess/E r-ess Ease en Access Easement Agreement is proposed over the driveway. The applicant shall has prepared a separate easement and exhibit clearly showing the location of the easement. This easement agreement shall be recorded. Easements The following drainage & utility easements are shown on the preliminary plat and a-r-e final plat: oo CSAH 54/20th Avenue = 20 ft oo Side Lot Lines = 10 ft oo Amelia Lake = Delineated Wetland + 10 ft or oo Amelia Lake = Floodplain 100 yr. Elevation + 10 ft (whichever is greater) oo Wetlands = Delineated boundary + 10 ft oo Stormwater Facilities = HWL + 10 ft Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Per City Code Section 1011.011, a stormwater management plan is required for all proposed land development activity if the site is within the 100-year floodplain or within 1,000 feet of a public water. Lake Amelia Woods is within the floodplain and shoreland district. 5 Per the Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Civil Methods, Inc. dated June 18, 2020, the project is expected to disturb approximately 5 acres and add 2.22 acres of new impervious area to the site. Runoff from the site enters Lake Amelia at 4 general locations. Drainage patterns will be maintained from existing to proposed conditions. No other properties will be impacted by runoff from the project. Drainage from the proposed impervious area will be conveyed to stormwater treatment basins and ultimately to Lake Amelia as it does under existing conditions. oo Water Quality Treatment Volume The City requires treatment of runoff based on 1.1" over the new impervious surface. Six (6) biofiltration basins with native vegetation are proposed for water quality treatment. Infiltration is not feasible due to presence of clay and the site is within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). oo Runoff Rate Control The City requires no increase in peak flow rates for the 2, 10 and 100 yr. frequency events. With the proposed basins, runoff rates are held or reduced for the overall project. oo Water Quality Control Water quality control is being provided through a series of biofiltration basins (raingardens). A minimum 75 foot wide vegetated wetland buffer along Wetland A (lake) equivalent to the shore impact zone area is provided as a stormwater management best management practice (BMP) to minimize runoff pollutants from entering the lake. This is supported by City Code Section 1102.07(1)(c)3c. The City Engineer commented that more information is was needed to determine low floor separation, basins shall be on the same lot as they are treating, and filtration basins are not allowed in the Drinking Water Supply Management Area. These items have been resolved. Per City Code Section I IO2.07(2)(a), structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Stormwater facilities are not allowed within the 150ft OHWL setback, 40 ft CSAH 54 setback or 10 ft side yard building setbacks. The basin on Lot 1 shall be is outside the 40 ft setback along CSAH 54. Utilities Sanitary Sewer Public sanitary sewer is not available to the site. Private septic systems will be required for each parcel. The plans show a primary and alternate site location per lot and Con corresponding soil boring data was provided. Standard mound systems are proposed for Lot 1 and Lot 2. Type 3 septic systems are proposed for Lot 3 and Lot 4. Per City Code Section 1102.12(2) of the Shoreland Management Overlay district, lots that would require use of holding tanks shall not be approved. Private septic systems cannot be located with the 150 ft shoreland setback. These requirements are met. Watermain Public watermain is not available to the site. Private wells will be required for each parcel. Well locations are shown on the preliminary plat and placed in relationship to the individual sewage disposal facilities on the same and adjoining lots. The applicant has demonstrated that each lot can accommodate a private well. Public Land Dedication Per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Anoka County Chain of Lakes -Otter Lake Regional Trail Master Plan, a regional trail is proposed on the east side of Amelia Lake. The proposed trail extends from CSAH 14 (Main Street) through the City's future recreational facility on Birch Street then south along 201h Avenue. A separate trail easement 20 ft wide along CSAH 54 and 44 ft wide along the south lot line of 6351 20th Avenue shall be recorded. The 44 ft wide easement covers both the 24 ft private driveway easement and 20 ft trail easement. The applicant shall has prepared a separate Permanent Trail and Sidewalk Easement document and exhibit clearly showing the trail easement location. This easement shall be recorded. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for each new lot. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 4 x 2021 Park Dedication Fee $3,160 = Total Due $12,640 Tree Preservation The goal of tree preservation is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity and forest resource and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. Tree preservation is especially important within the Shoreland Management Overlay District to prevent erosion, preserve shoreland aesthetics and protect wildlife habitat. Per the Tree List Inventory, there are 793 trees on the subject site. Per revised Sheet TR1-Tree Preservation Plan and Sheet TR2- Tree Mitigation Plan dated December 8, 2021, 2-3-5 187 trees will be saved, 5-36 605 will be removed in the basie „s non- 7 environmentally sensitive areas, and 22 1 will be removed in the natural resource protected area. These 22 t feesg . 41- be, ,,,:*_ god - * at a rate f one tree provided f they should not. The revised Tree Preservation Plan indicates 123 mitigation trees will be required. Because some of these trees are near grading limits for structures (7 trees with 17 trees required), and 2 are Green ash (with 2 trees required), there will only be 104 miti atgion trees required. The 104 mitigation trees need to be shown on the Tree Mitigation Plan with planting locations, or if the mitigation fee option is chosen, that should be noted on the plan as well. The Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan shall be revised accordingly_ prior to City Council approval. Landscaping Canopy cover, foundation landscaping, open space landscaping and buffer and screens are not required for the 4 lot subdivision. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required at the rate of 1 tree per lot frontage for singly family lots. Lots 1-4 contain existing trees along CSAH 54/20t' Avenue that serve as boulevard trees. No additional boulevard trees are required. Sod and Ground Cover All disturbed areas shall have appropriate ground cover in accordance with Section 1007.043(17)(h). Environmental Review Record An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The four (4) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Great River Energy & UPA Easements The preliminary plat plan set shows a 70 ft wide Great River Energy Easement over an existing overhead transmission line that runs north -south through the development. The plan set notes "Proposed Great River Energy Easement"; however, the easement exists and is recorded. All plan sheets have been revised to remove the word "proposed" and include the recording document number. The preliminary plat plan set also shows a 66 ft wide UPA Easement along CSAH 54. It does not appear this easement is over an existing utility line. If the easement is not required, it should be vacated. The owner- is eoFwspeadiag with the „tilit , , N. vaeate-the easemen Great River Energy/UPA has provided a Partial Release of Easement. This document shall be recorded. Wetlands A Wetland Delineation Report was completed by Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. on October 12, 2016. A WCA Notice of Decision (NOD) approving the wetland delineation was issued by VLAWMO on November 14, 2016. Although the NOD states the delineation is good for 3 years, staff received confirmation from VLAWMO that the NOD is actually good for 5 years. Five (5) wetlands were delineated on site. Buffer Minimum Base Buffer Wetland Acres Management Buffer Class Width Width A Wetland fringe NA 75ft' NA of Amelia Lake B 0.19 Manage 2 30ft 24ft C 0.67 Manage 2 30ft 24ft D 1.93 Preserve 75ft 67ft E 1.23 Manage 2 30ft 24ft lA MnRAM Buffer Management Classification was not provided for Wetland A due to its proximity to the lake OHWL. The City will require a 75ft wide wetland buffer equivalent to the shore impact zone as a stormwater BMP. Wetland buffer widths in accordance with VLAWO's Buffer Management Class are provided on the preliminary plat and have been approved by VLAWMO. A 75 foot wide vegetated wetland buffer equivalent to the shore impact zone area is provided along Wetland A (lake) as a stormwater management best management practice (BMP) to minimize runoff pollutants from entering the lake. The buffer extends 75 ft from the delineated wetland boundary. A wetland buffer declaration shall be recorded. The wetland buffer shall be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers. The wetland buffer widths have been adjusted according to VLAWMO policy. The driveway on Lot 2 no longer impacts the wetland buffers; therefore, a variance is not needed. A drainage and utility easement 10 feet above the delineated wetland is provided. All plan sheets have been revised to show the correct wetland buffer and drainage & utility easements. Rare, Unique or Significant Resources I Water willow (Decodon verticillatus), a MN DNR listed species of Special Concern, has been identified on site per the wetland delineation report. It occurs on undisturbed lakeshores. Conservation of this species depends on avoiding physical alterations of shoreline and preserving native plant buffers. Minimal impacts to the resource along the lake shore are allowed for a 20 ft wide access to the lake. Wetland D is classified as a preserve due to high value amphibian habitat and vegetative diversity. These areas will be protected by a wetland buffer adjacent to the wetlands and shoreline. Floodplain The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone AE floodplain along the lake. The FEMA base flood elevation (BFE) is 910.2 EL. No floodplain impacts are proposed with this development. Shoreland Management Overlay The general purpose and intent of the Shoreland Management Overlay ordinance is to protect public waters. Per the ordinance Policy statement, the uncontrolled use of shorelands of the city affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by contributing to pollution of public waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. Therefore, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare to provide for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands of public waters. As discussed, the site is located in a Shoreland Management Overlay district of Amelia Lake. This lake is a classified as a Natural Environment Lake and has a 908.1 OHWL elevation. The required OHWL setback is 150 ft for unsewered lots. The proposed houses and private septic system setbacks are compliant. Per City Code Section 1102.07(2)(a), structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Stormwater facilities are not allowed within the 150 ft OHWL setback, 40 ft CSAH 54 setback or 10 ft side yard building setbacks. The plans shall have been revised for Lot 1. Except for allowed water -orientated accessory structures, accessory structures and facilities shall meet the required principal structure setback and shall be centralized (City Code Section 1102.07(1)(c)6). Per City Code Section 1102.87(1)(c)4 of the Shoreland Management Overlay ordinance, impervious surface coverage on each lot must not exceed 30%. Per the Preliminary Plat, each lot is under 5.9% impervious and meet the allowed impervious surface coverage requirements. A native vegetated wetland buffer will be required as a stormwater management best management practice (BMP) to minimize runoff pollutants from entering the lake. 10 Wetland/Shoreline Buffer Zone Amelia Lake is one of the few unimpaired lakes in the city and efforts to protect and improve the natural resource should be implemented with any development. A 75 ft wide vegetated wetland/shoreline buffer along Wetland A (lake) is provided as a stormwater management best management practice (BMP) to minimize runoff pollutants from entering the lake. The buffer will also help stabilize the shoreline, reduce erosion and support aquatic plants and wildlife. One (1) access opening through the wetland buffer to the lake no greater than twenty (20) ft wide is allowed per lot. No structures, not even water -orientated accessory structures, are allowed in the 75 ft wide wetland/shoreline buffer zone. Shore Impact Zone By definition, the shore impact zone is the land between the OHWL and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50% of the structure. Since the required structure setback is 150 ft, the shore impact zone is 75 ft from the OHWL. No structures, not even water -orientated accessory structures, are allowed in the 75 ft wide wetland/shoreline buffer zone. Comprehensive Plan The preliminary and final plat are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan is regards to resource management system, land use plan, housing plan, transportation plan and sanitary sewer and water supply plan. Environmental Board Comments The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed preliminary plat on August 25, 2021. Their recommendations a-r-e were noted in the October 1, 2021 memo from the Environmental Coordinator. se ,.e,--, a flts have been addr-esse Outstanding comments are noted on the attached January 5.2022 Environmental Coordinator memo. These items shall be addressed prior to Council approval. One specific comment was to prohibit motorized boats on Amelia Lake. This requires adopting water surface restrictions with property owner input, a public hearing, City ordinance and MNDNR approval. At the September 8, 2021 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the Board did not support regulating motorized boat activity on the lake without input from all the lake property owners. The Board suggested the property owners could pursue this avenue on their own if they desired. One resident, Steve Gallop-6102 Centerville Road, spoke in favor of the restriction. The City Council did not require any restrictions either. Anoka County Highway Department 11 Per the County's October 7, 2021 letter, they have reviewed the preliminary plat and have no further comments. MNDNR Comments MNDNR provided email comments on October 6, 2021. They request the OHWL elevation (NAVD 88) shown on the preliminary plat be revised to reflect the DNR's official complete value which is 908.36. This revision has been made. VLAWMO Comments VLAWMO provided advisory comments on August 31, 2021 and September 27, 2021. Overall, the development's stormwater plan meets rate control, runoff volume and water quality requirements. Wetland boundaries, management classifications and buffer widths have also been reviewed and approved. Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City and shall be executed. Title Commitment The City Attorney provides the following comments regarding the title commitment and final plat. 1. The effective date shall be updated. 2. Item 15(a) in Schedule B-Part II indicates a gap exists between the road right-of- way and the property line. 3. These items shall be resolved prior to Council approval. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater ponds will be privately maintained and a Stormwater Maintenance Declaration will be required with the final plat and shall be recorded by the applicant. Findings of Fact -Final Plat The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the revised preliminary plat. 12 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and Not applicable. The final plat is for a 4 lot residential subdivision that is being constructed in one (]) phase. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Outstanding conditions listed below need to be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylars. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Lake Amelia Woods final plat with the following conditions: 1. The lots will have limited ability to construct accessory structures, decks and additions due to OHWL setbacks, floodplain, wetland buffers and topography. 2. The Access Easement Agreement with exhibit related to the private driveway for 6351 201h Avenue shall be recorded. 3. The Permanent Trail and Sidewalk Easement with exhibit shall be recorded. 4. The Partial Release of Easement granted by Great River Energy (GRE) as it relates to the UPA Easement Doc. No. 413293 shall be recorded. 5. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities shall be recorded. a. Stormwater basins are required to minimize stormwater and pollutants from entering public waters. 6. A Wetland Buffer Declaration shall be recorded against each lot. Vegetated wetland buffers shall be managed and maintained in accordance with the declaration. 7. A minimum 75 foot wide vegetated wetland buffer along Wetland A (lake) equivalent to the shore impact zone area shall be required as a stormwater management best management practice (BMP) to minimize runoff pollutants from entering the lake. a. One (1) access opening to the lake no greater than 20 feet wide is allowed on each lot. b. Minimal impacts to the water willow, an identified rare, unique and significant resource along the lake shore, are allowed for the 20ft wide access. c. No structures are allowed in the wetland buffer such as water -orientated accessory structures, boat houses, paver patios, sheds, etc. 8. All driveways shall be hard surfaced within the street right-of-way of CSAH 54/20th Avenue. 13 9. A licensed septic designer shall locate a primary and alternate site for private septic systems on each lot with consideration of wetland buffers, soil types and limitations, topography and shoreland district. This information shall be provided with each single family home building permit application. 10. No structures, stormwater facilities and private septic systems shall be located within the 150ft OHWL setback, 40ft CSAH 54 setback or loft side yard building setbacks. a. One (1) water -oriented accessory structure may be setback 75 feet from the OHWL and outside the wetland buffer. 11. No structures and septic systems shall be located in the wetland buffers. 12. The City's review and comments on the ghost plat do not grant any rights to develop the property as depicted on the ghost plat. The following items shall be addressed prior to Council approval: 1. All comments from WSB City Engineer memo dated January 5, 2022. 2. All comments from Environmental Coordinator memo dated January 5, 2022. 3. The applicant shall draft the Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities with exhibits. 4. The Access Easement Agreement exhibits shall be included in the document. 5. Title Commitment: a. The effective date shall be updated. b. Item 15(a) in Schedule B-Part II indicates a gap exists between the road right-of-way and the property line. Recorded copies of the following documents are required prior to issuance of any building permits: 1. Final Plat 2. Development Agreement 3. Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities 4. Access Easement Agreement 5. Permanent Trail and Sidewalk Easement 6. Partial Release of Easement 7. Wetland Buffer Declaration ATTACHMENTS 1. WSB City Engineer Memo dated January 5, 2022 2. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated January 5, 2022 3. Revised Preliminary Plat and Plan Set 4. Revised Sheet C05-Site Grading Overall 5. Final Plat 14 2 0 0 U' z w 00 U) 00 a N cD 0 L0 L0 z J Q a z a U) 0 0 N W H Z) W W af F- M W 00 wsb �� Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Kelsey Gelhar, EIT, WSB Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: January 5, 2022 Re: Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Review WSB Project Number — 018781-000 WSB has reviewed the preliminary plat for the Lake Amelia Woods development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Acre Land Surveying and Civil Methods, Inc., originally received on September 22, 2021. These comments are based on the preliminary plat documents and the following final plan sets and plat documents: • Lake Amelia Woods Preliminary Plat plan set prepared by Acre Land Surveying, dated December 8, 2021, received December 13, 2021 • Lake Amelia Woods Preliminary Plat plan set prepared by Acre Land Surveying, , received December 13, 2021 • Preliminary Plans for the Lake Amelia Woods prepared by Civil Methods, Inc., dated December 3, 2021, received December 13, 2021 • Lake Amelia Woods Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Civil Methods, Inc., dated June 18, 2020, received August 9, 2021 • Report of Geotechnical Explorations for Lake Amelia Patricia's Woods Senior Housing Development prepared by Independent Testing Technologies, Inc., dated October 12, 2016, received August 9, 2021. Applicant to respond to these comments in writing. Any changes to the plans that are not associated with these comments shall be identified by either a summary in the response or in the plans with a revision cloud or note. Civil Methods, Inc. responses to the September 1, 2021, memo shown in blue. WSB 10/6/2021 responses and comments are shown in red. Civil Methods, Inc. responses to the October 6, 2021, memo shown in green. WSB 1/5/2022 responses and comments are shown in Engineering • General The Lake Amelia Woods preliminary plat proposes to create four 10-acre parcels for single family homes along 201" Avenue (CSAH 54) in place of two existing parcels: 6149 201" Ave and the parcel immediately to the north (PID 35-31-22-13-0004). All of the proposed parcels will be accessed from 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and abut Amelia Lake. The lots are within the Shoreland Overlay District of Amelia Lake. The existing lots have a total area of 1,779,327 square feet (40.85 acres). Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 2 Each of the new lots is proposed to be over 10 acres in area and include the building pads for future homes. Comments: 1 Plans shall reference the c en+ VGFSOeR of the City Standard SpeeGmf aatiferns found on the Gity website and all details shall be updated to Gity Standard as applicable. Reference to the City Standard Qpecifica+inns has been added, and the Got Standard Details have been inGl de.t Please update GFEN_1 2 anrd GCAI_22 +e the most recent version (found On Appenrliv G of the Standard Specifica+inns) The indicated details have been updated to the most r ent versions the Cher �#ere shall + be an�i f 'litie +n 1c+inn 2. G��rrc-vrrvr cr.. vrn-rrrn^vrrs"�^. .7��.zr'cv'nmc.�Ai=-w*r�Z.vnvi� �-ithon +he 150' sherelan.t im act gene 7vi act zone. The same treatment volume and configuration has been maintained to . . 3leRt hydreleg*G function. The conceptual house footprints and droves are also Incaterd euaside of the 150' shereland impact 3. Applicant shall provide a permit or written authorization from Great River Energy and UPA to work within their easements. Permission will be obtained as needed from Great River Energy and UPA prior to completion of final construction plans. Prior to approving the final plat, the City of Lino Lakes will require written authorization from Great River Energy and UPA. See document for release of easement. City Attorney is reviewing document. 4. Ordrditinpal nentech data r rerd: a. Tide "c-cspplicant is PF6P9SiRg-�hommmc eld- burr nit areas. Iluildin pad Notes will he added +o final c nstrUc+inn plans indicating the r en+ fer cerrectn/e measures res Itmnn from +he in estina+inn bm Dercela+inn tests shall beprovided fer filtra+inn basins The filtra+inn basins ape planned- +n he c ns+n IGN-9d ;.Vi+h s cifierd n ylar borrow material with prediGtable n nla+inn rates'+e ensure proper f unction They will also in'nlu de u nrderrdrains to ensure proper drawdown • Grading & Stormwater Management The Lake Amelia Woods Plat will require site grading for the proposed house pads, the proposed driveways, storm water facilities, and other site grading. Elevations for the proposed house pads were provided on the grading plan for each property. The minimum elevations for the house pads are dependent on the groundwater elevation, the ordinary high water level (OWHL) of the Amelia Lake, and the design of the stormwater facilities. Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 3 The existing parcels are within the Amelia Resource Management Unit. The applicant is proposing approximately 2.22 acres of new impervious surface for the proposed driveways and proposed house pads at this time. The proposed project is within the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO). Stormwater BMPs are needed to meet City stormwater and shoreland requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet City stormwater requirements by constructing several stormwater basins and infiltration basins. The design of the ponds shall meet the requirements of Table 6 of the City's Stormwater Management ordinance. Comments: Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 4 ■_ URN ' ON I ON • Water Supply The existing properties are identified as part of the Stage 3 Planned Service Area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There is not currently any existing water main along 20tn Avenue (CSAH 54) in this area. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan does identify a future 8" watermain loop in this area. The proposed homes will need to install wells. Comments: 1. Proposed well locations shall be shown on the preliminary plans. Applicant to provide dimensions from proposed well locations to proposed building pads and to proposed septic systems (primary and secondary). Well locations have been updated and shown on the Preliminary Plat. Applicant to also put proposed well locations on the grading plans. Well locations have been added to the grading plan sheets. Well locations will be further reviewed with building permit applications. Well locations should not be within proposed driveways. Well location on Lot 3 conflicts with the drain tile. The properties with private wells within the high vulnerability zone of the DWSMA will be required to connect to municipal water, if municipal water becomes available in the future (per City Code). • Sanitary Sewer The existing properties are identified as part of the Stage 3 post 2040 Planned Service Area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and are located in the 4C sub -district. There is not Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 5 currently any existing sanitary sewer along 201h Avenue (CSAH 54) in this area. The proposed homes will be served by private septic systems. Transportation The site is located between Amelia Lake and 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). All proposed properties will have access off of 20th Avenue (CSAH 54), an Anoka County state aid highway and an A -Minor Arterial Reliever. A right-of-way width 120-ft is required for minor arterial streets. The existing right-of-way along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) varies from 55 feet to 70 feet west of centerline. For a portion of the plat, 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) is within the larger Interstate 35E right-of-way. 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) has capacity to handle the additional traffic from the new lots. Anoka County Parks Regional Trail and the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive plan identify a future reginal trail along the west side of 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). Comments: 1. AR additie.,ol 5 foot of right of way adja Ge.,t to ' nth there is loos the., 6_0 foot vVill her real fer f- Ifi Ire rej t9tal right _of_way width .. f (S-.A.. 154 ^eRteFliRe) 60FTfrom centerline of CSAH tin to proposed ROW • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are multiple existing wetlands within the Lake Amelia Woods project area. The plans note that the wetland information was provided by Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. and that field work was done between June and October of 2016 The applicant is not proposing any permanent impacts to wetlands with this project. Comments: A .. U.1 M .1 MAI 1 .. ,,. . _motor INW Ilan _. MaN. _ ,. ..1ramVITMINSIEN Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 6 . I/Vt H ■ , *O • Landscaping Restoration and rain garden/basin plant listing is reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator. • Floodplain There is existing floodplain on Lake Amelia Woods along Amelia Lake. It is identified as Zone AE with a base flood elevation of 910.2. The applicant is not proposing any grading or building within the floodplain. Comments: . .1r.T=z am Oar - Drainage and Utility Easements The applicant is proposing 10-ft wide drainage and utility easements along the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) right-of-way. The applicant is proposing 5-ft wide drainage and utility easements on adjacent property lines between lots. Per City Code, the City requires 10-ft wide drainage and utility easements along lot lines and allows these easements to be centered on common rear and side lot lines. Comments: Applicant shall provide the following Drainage and Utility (D&U) Easements: A. 22W_f+,.,i.Jo D&J 1 e ept ale„n 2WtwAvenue (CSA..1 54) heY„„d the Fight of way will her red fnr future water system Inn„inn �All Sid-p- .1d,+�eG Feq lire 1 W_ft D&I I e e„+s + n„-m�ar! Lake shall he aln„n the deli„eatewe+land i ease�ef�zs--a �� 1 Oft or fleedplai„ 100 yr eleyatie„ i 10 ft (whichever is eater) d All wetla„ds requireI a D& easement 10 ft from the delineated ho undar!i u Applicant to update the north D& I boundary for the southernmost. ).ie#lond on Lot it It does not appear to extend all the way to the right _of_way and/or the D& I easements adjacent to the right _of_way. e All stormwater facilities require a D& I easement 1 W_ft from the HW Easements have been updated and shown a ndica#ed Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 7 • Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater ponds will be privately maintained and a Stormwater Maintenance Declaration will be required with the final plat. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency — SSTS Septic Tank Installation Record/ Submission Form (for each lot) 4. Minnesota Department of Health - Well Notification and Fee (for each lot) 5. Anoka County Right of Way Permit and 4 Access Permits (1 access permit per lot) If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat Engineering Review CITY OF LINO KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: January 5th, 2022 Environmental Memo Re: Environmental Board Comments/August 25th, 2021/ Lake Amelia Woods The Environmental Board, at their August 25th meeting, had the following recommendations for Lake Amelia Woods: Env. Comments in blue, dated 10/01 /21, pertain to 9/22/21 Plan Set and 9/24/21 Response Letter. Applicant's technical memorandum dated 12/10/21. Env. Comments 1/05/22 in black. A survey for rare, unique, and significant resources should be performed. This survey should include a data request to the MN DNR for Natural Heritage Information System data; preparation of a master list of species found on site; and information on presence and/or extent of any MN DNR listed threatened, endangered, or special concern species. If any of the aforementioned species are identified on the site, their locations should be mapped as this may impact future work on the lots (lake access locations, for example). This is underway and results will be available as needed prior to construction. The status of the study has been discussed with City staff. The master species list and mapped locations of water willow have been received. We are waiting for the NHIS data request response and acknowledge that there is a backlog with these requests at the DNR. 0 Page 1 MR 0 removed. Ok. 4. Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila) appear on the list of trees intended to be saved. These trees should be removed if they are in the vicinity of other planned removals. Mitigation trees for removals of these species will not be required. Green ash and Siberian elm are called out as to be removed in areas where adjacent tree removal is taking place. No mitigation was calculated for these two species. 2 Green ash (trees 539 and 556) are still noted as requiring mitigation. These trees will not require mitigation trees. .MR 6. Stormwater basins are not part of Basic Use Areas. Trees that are planned to be removed in these areas must be mitigated for at applicable rates. 0 Page 2 All trees within the stormwater basins that are scheduled to be removed have now been mitigated for at applicable rates. The revised Tree Preservation Plan indicates 123 mitigation trees will be required. Because some of these trees are near grading limits for structures (7 trees with 17 trees required), and 2 are Green ash (with 2 trees required), there will only be 104 mitigation trees required. The 104 mitigation trees need to be shown on the Tree Mitigation Plan with planting locations, or if the mitigation fee option is chosen, that should be noted on the plan as well. • Page 3 PRELIMINARY PLATOFE0 "LAKE AMELIA WOODS " FOR: TJB HOMES, INC. VICINITY MAP 1F,L Uf! .� E BIRCU. ST EIRCH Sr qR,. �R 7 �y84 i m ,� L flHol H1I LID" 4. J4 RE11,U V- OTTER Lq} '%2 LSD W ` FDR - 'ti 12 VIR 1T � 1�G� F Q � v 0 6C CCow,(,,R�AD.J LINO LAKES, MN NO SCALE APPLICANT TJB HOMES, INC. 9100 BALTIMORE STREET NE BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 286-6868 THOMAS J. BUDZYNSKI, DEVELOPER SURVEYOR / LAND PLANNER ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE SUITE 100 BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 238-6278 JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER, PLS CIVIL ENGINEER CIVIL METHODS, INC. 1551 LIVINGSTON AVENUE, SUITE 104 WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55118 (763) 210-5713 KENT BRANDER, P.E. FOREST ECOLOGIST MIDWEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. 1032 WEST SEVENTH ST. #150 ST. PAUL, MN 55102 (651) 788-0641 KEN ARNDT, SR. FOREST ECOLOGIST, CWD OWNER JOHN COMMERS 9100 BALTIMORE STREET NE BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 286-6868 0 I \ \1 w- ° \\ o c 0 D \ Ld m �-o < \ z C _ O Q �� r i� i� n e i� /n r 1 rI f X CO _ z L/ L _ \/ \/ \/ / / \ L / L/ a ° L 4 T L N ' ° - 0 (n U z Tm O 0 0 Ar00 z -p (n - \ ) a ' W / 0 z -O L11�_ 0� c O� 0 0 C ro 7 O O ° 0 Qt\, 5CJ Qj J a> 950.4 9Q' 12A / r1.81 N89°22'59"W m Q J `n m GF 89�22'59"FQt°S�443± NORTH LINE GOV'T LOT18 9.79_ X \� I/9510 949.74�3 . - o secTTrail Esmt: �c� N89'22'59WN89'22'59"W ±425'/ �RIItilit e111_ X >� x�I N SB SB / -'�S$9' �- . - . - . 3$ J rA gg 1O. o '�p�FENCE LINE 21. FFT S0. OF LINE 'j 01C^EDGE 24.0 SO. of LSBm oaS6-1NORTH CD � A SB 5 2p2 w S65 6 I� S� / GRAPHIC SCALE 9� z SB 0 100 \\ ' 203 SB ® S13 5� m cSO. NO 9115.5 > / ^/ \ LOT 1 eg m o ti� SB �O ( IN FEET) ; \ y oGo0 L,aL, �e / 1 inch = 100ft. \ oIn � � set-�o � Q �� BLOCK BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME 0 SB GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA $ \ % < W SIB DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). o \ �� 911.8 943.8 � O DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: SB-3 � oN I m we a l 3 y(0 cn wets / - � SBS 9 SB/ O 41 o� o � SB-10? 3 0 ° SB-1 yet ° 718'� L-S89'55'55"W- - - - J CV18RC / CR-d ,Uo ,p � J �j J " 'e" Stt Zoe L I I 0� 928.8 �� ��/ �/ /C CV -BURIED. ? ? Q jJ ° °° / A 0 10-1 -1I 10 /0001(O^o �Q `� "a' s k g . - . -1. - . - . J - . - .1- . - . - /� C;� S, 8.9 / 9 05 `\ \ra0e g �oqy �e I � I � wet�ra >>a� � g � NO SCALE v, ae ",-m AL / P ° / N i o BEING 10 FEET WIDE ABUTTING SIDE PROPERTY LINES �� �P a �+- ;°M / / S 2 I °� wB AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, y�' a g25 I z AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. O� p4Q �J *° Z°6 I / /_j (n Z o F IZ 9 M. � m OE a OE O 0 o 9 �- C A i 0G 914.E _ C� OQ �� 'P IIL _*e` LOT 2 0)* �N / Drainage & Utility Easement=_ I /,� SB AL /'/ AIL 8M SB814 9 /'/' ° I AIL AIL AIL I \\ o 6 / � wet / JK• I / 920 3 / 9M SB-15/Sg J°M °M��R ^ \-- /' �\�' �I `b� - - of 1an9ent / oof o / S89'4910 W T� I h 8.0 _- N e 1 - - - - - 30 / ±976 �� V18RCP / A L / SB-16 / \ 923.1 •k e N 06 M / r ZONING 2625.37 / --- N89'2T46"W tip --�, / _ � o I n �- - m A P 2621.91 _ _ .0 N89 27 46 W EXISTING ZONING: RX (Rural Executive) /4 cS89*7'46!iH 22 --E-WI/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O o ast Iron Monument) / B / /' / PROPOSED ZONING: RX (Rural Executive) $g n LO zo SITE DATA J / ro' / ,� ,N ^� l TOTAL SITE AREA f40.85 acres o�Nz (f1,779,326 sf) LOT 3 / ' ° / ) / �� / / ���/ LOT DATA / REAR YARD s6 BLOCK 1 ' �����_/ � SETBACK = 30 927.8 SB-22AC vN 00 N amp 000 f+ SB 917.3 / 64 E ,S)43j4•72JSOINGLE AR EA FAMILY 10 ACRES z z Zz z - N�5� $B 3722"E / �o� / W 1-4 929.7 d o o N SB-2 � SIDE YARD SETBACK Od f o rn rnm se-23 R PRINCIPAL BUILDING - FT. CO� 91e.s SB P O 10 I it 0)`� Z.i�. rn SB-24 a H OPOsf / �,� . OV D s ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FT. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: LLI w w SB 330 FT. w w 30 Q o 3 A P FRONT YARD SETBACK -FT. (LOCAL STREET) o o s �/�c0 a 2 o� / / / / / - FRONT YARD SETBACK 40 FT. (ARTERIAL STREET) 3 m m ^ STREET .o. t0 9�3 S Q�Sb; a /i /�'% LEGEND z �� 917.2 LAND USAGE N i SB- I / /' 0 DENOTES PROPOSED WELL URBAN RESERVE DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES UTILITY POLE \ � J // / / II AREA CALCULATIONS DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR Lot 1 = ±438,525 sq. ft. (±10.07 acres) GWDENOTES GUY WIRE wet�_wet� �e�V� -� LOT 4 o / / Impervious (±76 sq ft.sf) _ ±5.9% ohw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE �r Lot 2 438,876 sq. ft. (f10.08 acres) %00 QP1f /� p ( ) SB DENOTES SETBACK Impervious ±24,347 sf - ±5.5% WB DENOTES PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER Lot 3 = ±442,356 sq. ft. (f10.16 acres) ,o° / wet DENOTES WETLAND y Impervious (±23,080 sf) = ±5.2% WB �S �ti ,� Lot 4 = ±459,570 sq. ft. (f10.55 acres) looyr DENOTES 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION 'gg, / ' Impervious (±25,096 sf) _ ±5.5% X��� DENOTES TREE TAG ANDD V xD01 %o /.// �� DENOTES GRAVEL 4�� / DENOTES BITUMINOUS o , 58 x� �� / BENCHMARK MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY g we -� �g \ %/'� �'�/, �/ ti / BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 (d) =DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT � � I let � / � ��/ � , 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 m = -wet�� 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT 3 II 40 / BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY g 0 , 3\oF �P� / ►/ v /� EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of Government Lot 8, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the Westerly Right -of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of $ ,��o• �, o Q/ / the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. �\ / p� AND \ That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, NOTES. \ , Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: N89311W Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of - Field work done June thru October of 2016. the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35' thence North at - 1100yr� / 8M SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7-- 8970 ,'-_ Meas=S89°20'13"E Deed=N89.52'21 "E n o w ok = o I rn j\ / i� O I / N N z �o 0 _ S1/4 Car. Sec. 35-31-22 / " (Derived from MN -DOT Plans & Milner Carley S89'12 41 E / field notes which shows on IP in -place o comer) 2611.13 NO MON. FOUND SW Cor. Sec. 35 V4_(Cast Iron Mon.) S89'12'41 "E 327.94 -' p - Wetland Information provided from Midwest Natural GWc� / right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, part of this survey. / 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point - The proposed lots will have limited ability to construct of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, accessory structures, decks and additions due to OHWL 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the setbacks, floodplain, wetland buffers and topography. Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. I hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by / me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed JOB iIrJ�%4 / Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Revised: 12-8-21 city comments Revised: 9-22-21 (city comments Revised: 9-2-21 septic borings 's) ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ . , ... Revised: 8-3-21 ((city comments N 55449 Revised: 5-20-21 (city comments) Blaine,, .. Revised: 11-24-20 (city comments) 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurvey gmail.com JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 4-10-20 Reg. No. 44655 SHEET S1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 Ill 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ant NmtuN wuuua FOR TJB HOMES, INC. VICINITY MAP ..� .IL_.v . . i PH_1� A TE LE DR 61RcysI BIRCH ST a� m c a c h _ 1 1 1�. r-7kl`'a v' fF.k9 yo. 2� P4'1 p L- . r us Jti _T ,. op a � - ` �t -I 5 2 RTH RC y,,c;.R 1H� I,�, A� N I.-III-ol HOLLy�R 4 qi ." 4.. F g cq . Q - °w z 12 yp'j-�' �- j 3. � . ti�G¢ a9R Q kp F - O1 6�. CGIJk�tGAb J LINO LAKES, MN NO SCALE APPLICANT TJB HOMES, INC. 9100 BALTIMORE STREET NE BLAINE, MN 55449 (763) 286-6868 THOMAS J. BUDZYNSKI, DEVELOPER SURVEYOR / LAND PLANNER ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC. _ _ C. O r� N '•. Z r. '!. / / A A / A . :' • '•• • .... c: � r � X m Z a � ••; � ...° 0: N r O O: ........ - 5, L of � O: :' p - o: l: . •. . T \N \. _ - . : :: .. - ,�. ° A .. z .... . -- .. .. . - �...>..... - .� 9 0\ : " «- + ... •:..:.:. 4 ............. O r7 fi . . : N.' / �: o o : -- rq.. o... ... f 4.. `•r '': `. `. '•'•............. - to a°i.. �. ( p;:' .'_ �: '> I' a� 950..4... ` ... ° .7 - N . GF .tee :. N89°22'5911VV.... ... :: � : m � �,. ° .......< .89�22'S9'.'E. • , - a 3 , . m �. 936' 0'3 : : o ,/� X 443± : NbRTH..LI'NE GOV'T.•- LOTi.8 _ 9.79 �' I 950.0 s 74 3 :, -: �\_ - . . ...... � ... �^ 49. : - .. �. ... 4 . : :............... 43 ' / x.... a : 10 /. / x x , :p: .. . A,, .... ': m' .. 5 y.., o : /: /a p1 OO FENCE LINE �21:1 FT SO. OF LINE V6 / 91g GRA S0. OF.. LINE g2 Op q0� I . F VEL EDGE 24 0 2 104 10A1 SB•• I: -_--150 --�--� �: F . 10 SB^1 I: : . : :�; : L� 45 Ip °1 ..........19... SB o$ :: 3b / ;. .. N S6 . 1p SB ._ 6 .*1O. .. I': la 945.8 �� eg16:., . :I : �,O ` SB-6 1�46 202 W A� / ::: qa 2 3 p493��? :N. �U 952.3 ` -5 SB 10 1 SB '. Q Q OSB •. ..... .... �' Oq I 4 �0 9� �' O' �1 1� . 915.5 .Y,. O. x . SB-2 `0 N I e 1o36 : N ..�. I. 1061 . oy : . J w F: Z.....;: N :� .I 942.2 O O SB-7O /: :: •' . 0 :: ;� SB 948 60 �056 M 10 _ °j~ S61-3 �/ :9SO 58381a55 �05 IG :I N : r : i : :� 1og4 . ;• m 0 �N . Z �R 1 1p. '' � / m M \ : $ . 0wo ......... w S 2� r °t B 9 ..... y �p35 I . ' / 2i 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE o er SB ' �' . : SUITE 100 . '` : � ® I .. BLAINE, MN 55449 0 . °+ 916.4 0 .I "' (763) 238-6278 ; :: m �p2b S6. 1 a ..I l.' JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER, PLS . 25 : �12g : '.. .het : 10 Z� i 10 1050 915.7 10�. :�10\ R I: �18 C CIVIL ENGINEER ry�1 SBg 4 SB . * 10pap2 p� 3 0� o� � yea /. ..... I. CIVIL METHODS, INC. ��� ' 01 61 2 y AL : 10 0 10 � t 57 : 928.8 1551 LIVINGSTON AVENUE, SUITE 104 O �� p p g q�?'` ° ' o 14 CV -BURIED. WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55118 � �.P O -9 e" 6 ,rL \� ... 9 pp8A � 10'\0'' :p' .. (763) 210-5713 t0 = � 0 99 5� 5g p1 6 �. $ I ....I. ..... o 'eM _ / Q 99. 91 ,-�9� : 1 3 KENT BRANDER, P.E. 00 W O' ti �P � 44 gA��g , 9 9 '�"IQ�g6 C3 9& - � 0 9t�11 a3g '' . FOREST ECOLOGIST ? /i �' e-11 �, �p g�9 g� 66'. I .�o... a " : / , ' . O O 9q'5 ` 9� 6. 3' 46�� . c1i.. v ,, ,`� e g4, � .2a4� `0 i - a� . g 4. o 4 MIDWEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (� Q 3 0 : 9 6e 2 95`� 5 2/ /-: /� :' 1032 WEST SEVENTH ST. #150 Q� �v �, G .* �eM � � g1Ca 9: g . *1k 63 gg 5 I �52 ,Rol 39 cQ O: ST. PAUL, MN 55102 v lO� �- g36}rga g5395 60 95 �,o.:// p0 �: : > (651) 788-0641 Q �J� �g.� x 2a 51�� g35 $1c�a1813g12���5��1 I5 ���8.. °1� �15 mo !: /j KEN ARNDT, SR. FOREST ECOLOGIST, CWD `O 00 4 ", alb-i g�5a� 6 * h �. I 13 34 35 13 1, 66 : G �v ,�7 g26 g3 93 ` 9p5. I � �45 . 4,� _ &4 . 1?p 0 23 � _.. ..* g33 g b. 8�q 165x -I 1.' � 80...... �54-14l* 44S ,�35. �1 �I? �21 M Z r :.••' :: r� ��p Q �9 , �a1 0. s :'*. , all S1I I �I I , ,� Ol Lu OWNER 3 .+`� : �g 5 �2 4 8,a. $0 $0 �b'I � -1bb � 1 ' $ g2.... •• •' �t�1 6 101 27 JOHN COMMERS �`O 5 1 `. `92. 0*93 �914.6: _� :ga 6 2�I $j��g �50. ��3 ��$ �1 egg SB-.12 0 9100 BALTIMORE STREET NE /\� g1 9 ��919�g2� $Zkg23 0 � p- a� �6 16�15 b ......3. '. �p o2p� ` BLAINE, MN 55449 O �g11gg1���91 . 0�g2o5 6b ..* 22 10p; �g .. '89$6 o 13 2 01F0� (763) 286-6868 \ 9 g .92 9 m 5 82..... g9 a I ` 1'L �. 6�' *o,11 .... .. b�9 gp4 : b2� $ :1 . I9� I O1 g11 � g0 . * pI 903 $ b2 5 ........ '� ga g � 96 � g5 . .. r ........ ga9 * 9,�0 9 2 g29 � a3 841 *#�g2 �o. I p 95''� 6 a@$' 9�.. '' 30 ..............3� 3 :./ : ' / r p gab ag . .8. ��b9 *.. � b :'• 34 9 3g.•.... fig.. �� .$g� g9 b93 $g� 5g9 g01 � 8 155. b •' .. I I ., m 1. g9.. 6a. S $ 32 t . . co aa6' br, 9�.• '' * *.b 36.. ' 4�e r aa� .'.-9 a? 18I6 . ... �� . J. -.. $33..... 9 o r �ro' :' :� / �a$5 ,12 ,5 �869 .•� b 8a6 ..� N ;:. ��/ :8 a�8..b41..bb1.�2��p' g .-,a44 I ' ` _5,O? �faap ab4 $6o 2 g5b a � b g. 45 �d` I ti /: / �,Q, :. // , // . ZZ 3219 g220�31,�'C' �1ba �• 928..8 b5b.__...._'. ti.. //./. 32 : 0 ........ '' ......� ... 2 - Z a yet . 32 y2,��\ �.......... �.8 $5 .85 :wee ri1L I I / / :' r, o 'd'x" 8 32p� 321 I 3223 wet M / J 0 g1 9/� 2p.3 kR........ m211. 632h.....3 H3 X3 jl, 1 s6.o15...S6........e� 'e�... I..�..Al..... p - / eh at P Z . .....,I_-*roo �, p YIL �9..�5�.,.y� �..... .,...i',........I.......... I `b� - Npt 1a 9 . g8 / ............. 1 'S 60 5 7 J, 918 1H.0 ' o o .. N v0U. apt � 59g �32 3g �t,b'1 ( ,Nl*1...555..55-.. ...... ..1.......1......... GVt8RCP 1 I 6A 6 95 0 5 �. 6' S 1 i.. z : 0 w 56$ 565 4.x 5,..._ .2 920.6� _.....r...., �� 9 516. 5 b3 5 59'. E ' ..t -L. ° 0 / / c c :S$ O: ,.• 651 64g•.,.59 Sg6 g5 5 5g3 5 (RS 56 �5 �560� 5 9 B-16 .. \ _ r . CV1 1R k c . .: 92 �S �64a ''.• �� 5 � 1g.- 5�' � 55a \v.. ` ..... ...... r�0... 8 CP''`. o a50 4.1 `-� 5 I.. 1. 6 5$ 01 g4 3 X 561 ��'r. .... I 65 b. 2 89 5 �,. � 9 42 43 \. $ \ �. 6pa.. ...., "646465 *;;-?56,56' ,!, bbb*. jk• x: bg\� g2 * - A'A........ \ ` / _ . o �j g:' .....64 643 •.. 593+i b"1 5ab •,fib?_- ag'� �O b91. 54 45 `'.\ N o I N 60. 65 5 b9 39* �3� p12 c z / `: 9 ''•. r :'�61p`. `.............2.. ... _Sg2 688�6a66�9 gb �** f . I.......... �° . :. I / i 1 b4 90' x a 54 54 \ /.e �' 01 Q/ 3 i .''. 4 I 5 n r / j ::7 8 .,2'1,b4 4�.65?'gg!#'•......:` 6$ �. �6a5 �6g�8 65 63�\��6 SB�16 .51� :'55 51k �g I r�0 ° I� O, / /.J. N :$16. 6 539� 16611�. �684 33 5532 �� 548 �b1�1�x$�..... / z ' : 65 *b�3'., bq. 658.• 59. a1 �5y�9 6g3 � '. 5 0 51� 51a 513 3�9gg 5 4ba / o 6 2�...... 66b �. 80 ' 31''�g93 49 �j4 �5 .' S 6 5 6 i2 5 5 3 52 3 19� , 4a9� f. / . // / ON :x a36 . 3 6� Q62 ' 66 6� 0b� 1b� g�bg1 53 52 �522 509505 6 g 48�� / / 0 5 � 0 � 49 6 / �O 1Q.-�� 61A :36 �6 Zp8 66`a:��6b66 �6� 9�852b 524 �25p850�0� 91 �� 1 _2625.37 a O 63 b 6b .... 522 . 5 3 :49� 16.. / r � N89'27 46 W CV ::: , 63 9 . 06�., b o p2�4 9 .. a 1 . - In, 6"� �5a9 2 5 5 _` f r� .� N89; 2� � :'W W1/4 49B9;&7'AlW"0 22 --E-W1/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O :: : : : 61 63262 2� 50 / / . 621 91. (Cast Iron Monument) U► 6 <tr o ag'SB 9 .b2� a2h6`k,...: '' .... ;: 3 920 .. 619 b20 S 31' ......... / 0 / / !T 9j6:: „ti :r 2:::::.... ... ''•...618621 211 / ,.�: . ..:::,..:•. Q .... . : •....... ........, .. 9' �^ �i . ., . .. .........:.......... . �.. / eP..' .�..: 8 3 4 / / J o: O • .N 1 i �. ��-... •.. ,.: � ice.;_ 9 :.. CN I O N �: p __, ::. , Q ......r f O -q II / :`: Q 9 / cn: �. .. O o O, lc� / �O�^ Q i - . . p .. OO / ��0� : �: i. i / :: 13 �kr o 9c� c,0 �/ U / i , �./ ►. ... A : w,: ZONING : N : ••.`. : w � �/ :`'w�h / EXISTING X (Ru al Executive) ZONING R r Q4 �' w:::: ��: - �� / PROPOSED ZONING: RX (Rural Executive) s27,-8 : �?:::4 :..:::9�0:... / �. / rA,,l, / O SB=22 �j /J . 0 .. 9 .1 C3'.. Q., :::: /, v N 00 N 00 CO �S :: a2 . - . *, 3� ga " SB 917.3 : � / ; ` ' •. 4/ 00 00 * * 3 83 ...* 3 cP SB 21 : : '4-55 ;g . . / _.. b / N g O �' ..... 1 / ��o 9 9 R Q 918. CQ 33� . ao M , 3$�46 :3g� A • 4 �34 b .. C's��: / . O Z Z Z Z Z Z 3�6 �� .. 3a5::. : ? 43� � .. A3 � O� // /:: . / N �' :.' �i ':.::'.': 3�6��S63gF3a63945 I / W ap '� 0 2/:: 929:7 $�qxp3 42� 42b g a / �� / / O N 01. ' : r ` 35 ` 91 �� ,, 426 g ` �g : . : : � o 1 �C/ Ol ; �e O qj 2 '- 0.. SB723 O rn O O SB-2 13 '. . 3 :3g9i39�04p2 f � q2 /,O Z `-' Z mil. O) O 1 '3 .3� 4.... , : 404 � 401* 42�4423�; 438' ` / ''• /' 1 t° O U 3� �3SBg1 + 362 A09 405 kq2 A,�. 4No j' o�q��i! / .'/ / SITE DATA 1 J Q a a � 363 4pa 4q1 Os �^� 3g1 0 4 q1-1 •. 43 � - 1 W W W � 3bb 6, * s 13x N 41 0 442 � TOTAL SITE AREA i40.85 acres 9 `/: W W 32 x3 2 j'. 3 5 358 5 * 415 41° 42�. 444 // . ..: . 1 Q g 2, -A36 416 ':A 4� : : / / 1 3 O 32x32 3�a 356'. a 445x : 0 1 2 O 32 6 �9 '� 9204b,. 00• /f O -� Q tp . L'r5� m363��3� � �12 �4$'x D , % D` D yC: fi c0 ,b���hh33344 SB �450 5 / /P ..... 2 , . 340 A, , 4 3� /// / . .... : �1g39 33�� 2 5b� 2 / / j / *. rn ,b 31b. ON � • 3 O� &t N 31 X 917.2 56: 0� 'h5 - o : // Z :*.........• SB-2s q 4 455 �....., �� �2 O O . 31I : ,%: / /.. ' :y - / �a� /�,/ 45g :: . , �'. Ca p� �315'4 45g: a . ./. / 4b2 ; ..'. /: °� : q63 / o W `"I q64 : X 4�I 6$ / off. 4 / /. 3 0 9 `* I / ..", a ! �15 �' . . . �� / ` LAND USAGE wet. O 0 A, 0 �•^ -wet �2 4� /, URBAN RESERVE �� : �, //j . ..: tq , ,� C . o .. / o as jam•••••.... //.. �4j ' o pool s " -. / I / ::. 6.: ' .Se ''. .. . 0 o� Sg ..........� .:.... : w ,� ti� BENCHMARK 06 :: ` . BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 ....W .... ' ` "` ` 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 /. / :. wet.. j+.... .. ar. �. . .. :: "" : ' j / 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 98'................ ry / BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY •. ' :E : / / M.. // ::/: / ��'// / - / .' o OF 3�P f:: / `fir s1 G� . / EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION :::; : �,o : : / / /' / / That part of Government Lot 8, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of / / _ / . . . / j the Westerly Right of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet / of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of (8 `'� �� :' / / 2i O12 / the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. /0�2� AN D /:. .:'i That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, �� . /' Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: NR9::20.13!.V�T: : '.:�_ ' / Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of -. •' . / the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35; thence North at I94 W.: .. ri h an les o the outh •ne of said Sec ° 35 fo a dis e f 1,328.0 feet to <........../ 1QOYr / g t g t S II tlon r tanc o /. the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7�/89 70 �// 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point Meas=S89°2o'13"E f: ' of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 de rees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, Deed=N89°52'21 "E /' g 4 / 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the �o w Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. N N °' EXCEPT that part taken for highway and as shown in deed Doc. No. 609249. MM" / .::: IN ° o ; � I hereb certif that this Ian sketch or re ort was re ared b a0o: , Y Y P P P P Y M o Z me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed S. • Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Revised: 12-8-21 city comments) /�� Revised: 9-22-21 city comments) °�� Revised: 8-3-21 (city comments) / _ / Revised: 5-20-21 (city comments) _ S1/4 Cor. Sec. N-DOT 22 / Revised: 11-24-20 (city comments) � (Derived from MN -DOT Plans &Milner Corley �S89'12'41"E / field notes which shows an IP in -place a corner) Revised: 5-26-20 (trees) 2611.13 _ - NO MON. FOUND SW Cor. Sec. 35 S89°12'41 "E 327.94 ' (Cast Iron Mon.) JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 4-10-20 Reg. No. 44655 SHEET S2 BYO I 1 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). (f1,779,326 sf) LEGEND o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET � DENOTES UTILITY POLE •: ' ':• DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR GW�DENOTES GUY WIRE 0h- DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE SB DENOTES SETBACK wet DENOTES WETLAND 1o0yr DENOTES 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION ��� DENOTES TREE TAG DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES BITUMINOUS MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY (d) = DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT (m) = DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT 1VfAT1Ta C - Field work done June thru October of 2016. - Wetland information provided from Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as part of this survey. JOB #15074 ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ ; ; ... Blaine, MN 55449 II 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurveyc)gmail.com 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 I7 18 19 110 111 112 I13 114 115 I16 117 118 I19 120 Resource Inventory Map [see also Resource Inventory - custom Soil Resource Report) FOR: TJB HOMES, INC. VICINITY MAP - = �14 Nl'IL�.y_ - ic.L L.ft � 5° ,. EIIRC S BIRCH'ST - "t _ _ _ „!xC it �r oe 1p ol) 2� hp 114I i i �'' _/ RTH RR 2$ F rl: �..`.R l: dEa y . "NHS HOLLYDR /'I �//,r /// Rv �B/#L .- ':�TTEFI � ` Lsa� ,. °a c Im _ °w i J 2 1+1� r I e - IF 9 _ 6�� [, I ...I � Ri L J LINO LAKES, NIN NO SCALE NoRur " GRAPHIC SCA 0 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. .........•::............ ...... v ..... 9 (..''T.�: .. . : ............. . 6• : : •....................... : : : .* � o \I ............ _. ....... ���... ' o''' 1 . : : . ,o.;c O \ jI. \\.. :0 LLI. rn � , c N� : Z -o -• - r� I.. iN /N r, e i /.......r� r� :` .� a) , o : _ : : : 1 'a) :2 : : L_1 L - �,' .�, � I I , -1 / \ L� . .. / ." ... : : o > L :� . -. - - - . .(. .r O - o:. . ... . . I . . -7.--'- : � .. . .1. - �. . . - . . I..:::: . , . . ....... . : . ..... i - .. .... . .. -I'.... .... * : _F�, .. -­ .... '... � : ... /.: . , ... ........ 1.11'..... - \.. . .... . .. ... . z in N •'''•­11...... ?......w ._ _ .. . 3� r-I . . . : . .. . p ..... N � T 0-. . - �.. H is ., r... . 9 /,. / .. . o �' _' . f a � - . .. . ... .. .. . . .. .. . . � �6 � I . . . a : : / I !n rA 950..4... ' OQ Fi a��:? �° `: : 1 89°22'.�i�11;AT..... ' .......... ' m � 3 C,+j.. j .� . o GF......9022'9K �09. 195�e�� 936' ��� ...i %44 NOR N7 :� •A 3+ ........ TH..LI' GOV'T.`LOTi.8` 9:79 �' ^ \ 5 _ O - ' / iT 950.0 9 ,`�3 `...;'.00. , ......>'�? - . - . - d-T - - ` - -` .. I .: '22'59"W - /..r=- - o e _ E�mt - N89 0� . - : •22'S9°W 425' btu. : _t ' : N89 f . 4 . c `:................ i/; :' ,r/ i lit 11t_ _ >� x nCN /tlp o F / * . m SB I�_ rf/ �i.-.-:.S89.�-.-.�.3$ �r cVN 256.. l o: i. oD FENCE LINE 2i:1 FT so. OF LINE ��f ........ E:: 10 . ... 1. / ` P 2p1 �j�N I F� /. O `� . .... GRAVEL EDGE 24.0 SO: OF...L 21. ! / . " : . ........ 2 . .. . W . p�' .. I: p: . I I ° I. 1 l : , SB-1 f pQ I � � . . . : . � ) � � . .. : : .... ti. , . A I . SB / LE 915' . / , . 2p2 I :LL1 ' { /7 sgo, / B. I'% oJ . . / : ��os6-595 �%/ ` !' .... n 915.. I H .0 SB-2 `0 NNO` I '. . / / d% / -O N f LOT 1 . � � N LLI `:I ' .. � ��� I I a . BLO: . ..... �CK7 : q / :", : **' "' �.m ,::: ... � ..: .... .�' '' -9 : : BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME `: Aa �.. � SB .948 SI3 /� / a. .:: ,. GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA � { r : M Q . <2 W :I 1 . 943.0 : WfJ 9) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). ' _ \'., F\ sl l.s ` . ' •:9s0 SB-s z ,.. � we :I .: .. . /... .. .. . :I o 0 a t� / o - T - - - :I 935.5 vJ �\ 'sue 3 y( n I\ _ I: SB-9 SB / � $ we �..... Q.. 2 t r /: t I /.. 4 2i �. AIL // �� m ' . � 01 . w _---y I _ _ x. � � � ... ® ` : - . . c °. 916.4 I p I _ / • el Se-10?.I . I \ ;I JJ I �� l : : �: st O m �\ L .' » - J 5.7 718: � ;' S89.55 55.. W- .. T ... .. /..... cva sRc . :� SB_4SB j. / . - / . - �O�N� f s691�a I: : �. ... �':: 92s.8 O�� 1 0 . t.' � o I 0 . - . . CV -BURIED? p0' �,� p P° / c �, I I I �y°f� a' Cr 0. O' N o �, S B 9M �Wc �'v�.\�\ c� : -, p" � /C o^ `� s.s $ �p5 ...../ . .. \ t �\r°ge �111L °� � : •' // / / 915... II I Are �' . '' N �! : / v, ,Q 3 e. : __o .jL / o I. / Z� i N O (r,tt 3 M: / �l .j . I . .. / / .: `� opo f I .,6,� I 11 ­_ �zo I / f, : / 40 .. I . . :-.:1__' 2. : . ... .. .­ . � . .. ..0) . : .: .. . . � . /_-`� ` :. .. .. , . . _...7IIIIIi .. ..... . - .... - ,�,�.. . ....... t... \ � � .. ..... . ' 0�' 914 6::: . .. _ 0► Lu •• .. ... /. . �V : .. �4. � .::�: �•N6.. 3 /. . ) : .. . : . :. V : , d� 1�1 I /... O /11 .. o< i .. . ,t A` I" `' I . .aA, f I / i. . .. .. - . . .. / ...... IT) . ... . . �° LOT 2 0 -/ ti /.w.�� Q , .. co' . / *' :.. .. e . ... A....: a, , g2Z ..' : d' �� Drainage & asement�__ I ` �' �,� ti / j ���• 9 . � .. S :: �// LA) � ..gym . / // _ I\\\ WM / .. . / . :: , BM.9 , // o I �\: ..: / . / o I " . . .. . . .......... ... - , . : . . 61 * . : . .. . / . � .. o x, / M : U m i°M S...-15/ SB . ..., eM .......................... .eA �� \' . f.:..................... M I _ °t '' ' I..... _ 6geiV P - � /3. -_ .. 'g < W cP�` a . / i � o � � o GZ�.. 1'0� VSRCPT 9' ' �'�" 9 8` �b �j0' � 'Not �° '�i �..�,,.: IF • . - 9cr - : •. i.. f / B r' \ ..i o / / !! •... /'' 923.1 °� c 920 : �� 1 agoI �0.. CVIBRC. o .. W ...... /' �;s :::: .... 9 Ch% ` \` / ::. a o , Iwo z� r Ste. °1 WB .. /�: :�::: . .. . Is /r . .. .. . S°s �rn I / �o / 1. z /io; / / / J /: : •' 2 9 �.......%� . . 2625.37 » O� �f .:`: �_ 2g �� - � N89'2746 W �`V 1 `A P'' 2621.9t� - r ' ' .O N89a2.. / .. �' "''(N/ /4 �89;�7 der"$ 22-E-W1/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O:: M �- / / (Cost Iron Monument) .-� ..11/ Z .: m/, ..... . I. ; .. 21 Q / .... 3.........:'. .'.'.:.'.' .'.:::...::::: n �: .... �� / . . 9' ......... �� // ......-...:,. . /. , * / . lg:. .:::..:::.::::....: . �. m � . / �::::' . .:...:..::......... ..... ,.. ............. 916... �.,::'. :::::.cam; ..:.,......., ... 3 :/ ^ ^ N / : / I o: •..................... . �-....... . .. ;, :91 0 oi. ��......� .. ro. / rn. 1 p �� /� ^h // . ? II \ . m 9 / / N �: O /' ::•.. .............3 ::. .... , ,.� y: O 8 i _ - \...... 9 /�•� ? 2 o / (�� / v ✓0 O/ II +� 9 / p cn . �.. :.j::::':':: C� O / ! q' Q a :' ;......:::..:LiQT••3 • •., ..... -. Q• i O� . a IL �m �./:. Y 1. 1 / � �. �� . .\ . :.:1"............................::..... /. Q/ / `h- / v p%'. .. .,. % ..: : : : :A �����: w� \Y .. * - * - - 16\ . : . . : SB 0 o /::::. . Al, / ` . , I :. s6= ^�\ Q. V v N c0 �S : ..... ' .. - ...''\ 91 6'SB 917.3': �� �, N � - : V ............•••.... SB-21.:: / : e LEGEND .. '9 1 Sps o.::. 4 , s�• .. . . O o 0 9 6 M 31 �'' '' d �'r o Q o Q> 2g,45 E G ,s�4��' ?�...�. `\.... �.. O °� z z zZ a cb DENOTES SOIL RESOURCE PER USDA NRCS / Z .'p1 . . 2� F �' O // ( ) �B /:' / CO oN �`.`' `. / z`b�.: • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND Y o O O N ' ..1 s2s:7 ' \C j� :. p M 916:8 S ._7 .. p • O' I 11 rn 11 11 rn SB-24%... R�POs f� I . cn\ O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET g ,. ,. - J,- D, /./ `ti DENOTES UTILITY POLE W �, W s6 // �j // DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR I /. . t w w voi m ` . / / / 3 / / / 1 Q o A. P:.. �/ / Gw�DENOTES GUY WIRE oo �w oo f :1 o 3 s 2 �m/^o /Oro. /' %°`� ohw OVERHEAD WIRE ,� DENOTES ~ g1 �� ' S ��'\O �� SB DENOTES SETBACK I� 21 6 / / / ..: :. o ��1- / /v /-wet- .DENOTES WETLAND off, , ° : ei 1215 �'' %/ % 100yr DENOTES 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION o0 N 917.2 : 0\ 0 / // o W I • / // �, °' x �� DENOTES TREE TAG ........ ... �: s6- ....­ .... ....: :.::/ .:....I....... '. ­.1::..1., ­''.� °* I :` /' /`��� DENOTES GRAVEL W . # // �' / `''' �/ / �2/O DENOTES BITUMINOUS //•. 03 :: / / ::` - ' . / ��/: % o / �: /. MC -DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY 3 ; `�, _-_. �. ,. // o :(d) = MEASURE DENOTES DEED OR RECORD /'* - . ... ::- �..:��// (m) DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT wet.^�-wet Semen\\. / LOT A ,. �. o ` /, .. e� / i/ 3 °\�\Og :� //'/ /i / _,pc ,� /� �WB I WB \ . . . : . / . " " s ry. 9. . % o 1 9 p0 / '/ " 1, soot "" . /i �w ,� p , 1 / / C \.. 9. ... �, / m1...... .. 6, o�� / : `�� . - -1/ BENCHMARK 0 o ti WB �wB.... ' ..'..:...:''::'�; •., // / BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 �� .. ' , ` ': , 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 ..........: ............. ... ee ..• '.m •'••. `'::. I. / 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 M 9�.................'-" N / BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY .1 we \\ is /.''�/ / a , ��: \ / .. / ,/ . / % EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 8:;3:.: GE\ .. : /. / r - :: /�`,O % / That art of Government Lot 8 Section 35 Township 31 Range 22 lying Wester) of / P P 9 Y 9 Y / \ `/ the Westerly Right -of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet / \ �p �., .: / / / of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of ,^ :: AL (�; - / / z Sze the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. 8 /. �.. \\\ ... ,.:` / ., / Zej... AND '. .. .. ../ .... :: \: . / That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, NOTES: /.: • /, Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: o . :i>. �� / /:: :' Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of - Field work done June thru October of 2016. N8:9' �... . :' >E ::._ / the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35• thence North at - Wetland information provided from Midwest Natural y ... .......... I94 w g Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as l right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to .............��, " .� ��x ";/ the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, part of this survey. SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7-' / �� / 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point 89.70 �_-} m : of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 Meas=S89°20'13"E .f ' seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, Deed=N89°52'21"E /' 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the ,no � / Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. 1•0 o w : / /:. /... / : : : .:' NN : r') 1h ^ . ' / it it • 05., : I hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by rnoo: _: oZ / O1:` me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed JOB #15074 S . / Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Revised: 12-8-21 (city comments) -__1 Revised: 9-22-21 (city comments) ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ ::... 1) Revised: 8-3-21 (city comments) Blaine, MN 55449 .. _ S1/4 Cor. Sec. 35-31-22 ; Revised: 5-20-21 (city comments) 1111 / (Derived from MN -DOT Plans & Milner Carney Revised: 11-24-20 (city comments) 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurvey gmail.com S89°12'41 "E / field notes which shows an IP in -place a� corner) 2611.13 _ - NO MON. FOUND Date: 4-10-20 Re No. 44655 -SW Cor. sec. 35 _T - - JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER g• SHEET S3 0 1 2 3 4 s s 7 8 s 10 v 12 13 14 1s 1s 17 1s 19 20 (Cast Iron Mon.) S89°12'41 "E 327.94 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :.:............ .........-::.:.......... ...... 11 �� - . _ : - . ..... ..... .. cj32 ............ :� ..... -;� j . '. / ....................I... _. ............. �. a�.0 ° FOR• TJB HOMES INC. .... z I I ,/ _ . Nam'•. c: r� �.. i� i� n n i, /n.....I: r� . .. •..:-" X...a O .... :' a� . O of T L a O F G I ''��L.. .... � /\ l i I I I o - o: I: : J: N o Tm :. .. `. . . .. \ � - ° �' - ,< .� . a A ••"'... .... -- .. .... z a..N �?. . O N T - Z b 0 3 0 � •.,•• •• ;.... ....a) .. G1 .. ... . ,_ a;c...:•• 9 . ro' fi ,... . 4q O N....... O.•� :e / VICINITY MAP 5 ��.:IL�S'A - IEEE IIR Y a , ...I �I N .9'SD..4 p� * O I I I N GF........ 6\ ,-ri, < P c LL ro :• : a 74• �,(pQ 9 et` ... m 61R�j,5; BIRCH Sr n� 189 22 597 i m L o �,. 89p22'�9 �. ': , a t m �e 936' w 443+ . NORTH .LI'NE GCrV'T.•-•L _ 9.79 ko 950.0 4 3 .;/ e �P dp�Rfl .� y ��s"',T ' o eCr�4il Esmt . .. �-. 0-�� ....r . ' I /-- .21 as 4, : 2'S9„W � � .. a s ..T 89'2 N89`2 f42 _ N 0 ,� 1 �: �.: . N i lit ` _ x_ x o . RTH rso Q r,u..R Lk = ./ f i l ". - - . - . l(V N "' m' O ` L / / � P� FENCE LINE 1:fi FT S0. OF LIN �V f' . [11Hd1 . . 1 ^ Gy. ;:. 1 J �: 9•. g1 pt oF� p� •+ " GRAVEL EDGE 24.0 S0: OF.. D „ 29� 9 : a� HOLLv DR _%i : :j Z00 •'"••• p '... 2. O I . li �;O^ ... 1 �O : . r %: �� 56�1 f �0 " j / r •PEf4idG Rp ply : : : ................. / ) A I se l / ��HLL=off i?':: m 94 8 / crrEe ;: - 7i. 16:6 E.I ` I •�.fl SB 6� Q c R 915 2p2 'D N: .i - /� 6O / O. •. ` 2 :. '. '. s2i pif S !�O n SB5.5 1. N < .::f' �.... (� ✓ I. 942.2 : • Q CA SB-7 0 LINO LAKES, MN NO SCALE - \ �� I .I m * � ': /'. BLOCK �. ,. \ 94 SB a �: I N z ` we I �`° o.� - / m - - •" /rti 1 0 �; - -��-- - - - I 93 .5 SB p � :; m n _ I SB 9 / 1 �j 3 y( wet \.":. �...... Q.' ••.�2 : : °p m 1. ��' o. mew _ __ �` \ 916.4 ' B'-10? I 1. W. :./ et °° 718'� 'L -I- .-S89'55'55"W- - J 1 GV18RC . ry� 1 1� , SB-4 : �et� / S891A 8 l:' ...� �o� % Q GRAPHIC SCALE ��O,ow �w -, « I � :. ' Zoe o .1 I ..... � .. CV-B o :. I ` _� CV -BURIED? 0 00 Q �jJ LO : ti =� / ............" , o . o�• ^rO O . >< S A I I etn : ,�' ' . , �,�,�y ref . ," ow• ,moo `� �° �° s B I. � :� : z :' . ( IN FEET ) �% to ? // �' / /915.. I �t �o. �h N /�. 1 inch = 100ft. ��, �,Q ` 00 I '/« ; 2a� P I i � "Z � .. � � � V _ - 3 �10M �: " BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME O� 00 1J ,o�' Zoa I �" ° / / /- ' GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA \ o I / :: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). �- �P 30 �� .. ... Z �� 914.6: •...... - i �I C �o J��. ... ' ::. '' I L` f : j / •/ . `',� ,t . �� ......./ ae I ;.'m . I ' ` :/ Mi. SBA. / et 3 f� `.= ;' LOT 2 o a . <� / ........... ' / j a` , g'Z2 ... `, �� Drainage &Utility Easement=_ I N /,^ N / /.' : i AL �� Sty •':. ..�� • : // / / // . " ::..•.:.: ` / •••:::'' z Q •ME �� '�'ZOr' ]111L 9 m / / / �b'�O. / W i Wet../ •. la- 00 x.,. .. �eM 9 20.3 / �: ' U q SB-15/ %ep m . . a o W cP�` a - I ��� I r� J w 2 1'0........... ��.....I.. { 9 - 0 4v ." .-.-.-. o 9 . o oa .-. -�� . - - 3 .-.-.-.-6r.- k i : ` A} z v : . " . f976 I . / s 6�.... �... V1.8RCP f : .� / : .S -16 ,.I \ ..t o / / c c :S' J / _: V \ _ j. I /'/ 923.1' o $ •920�s : �.' r�®'. CVIBRCP'. I.. 1. v l Ch N t, �. : ', $ \ .... O W ro q \ I . :. r - m ` .... /� 2 / �F / o_ cn � e 0 1 • '° M - O �. � We / Ste" L .......... / i "/:X : ..... : N rn � C3 I z / / .:: 9 6 �' 2625.37 N89.27'46"W ti0�0 �.. 20 �8 �" ..... / %. '.• /�- -. ' _ : A P........ 2621.91., r = .� N89a271461.! (^7/ \^11/4 4�89;�7 der"$ 22-E-W1/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O� M / / (Cast Iron Monument) 01 // B;' . ...... / 1 Q .. .. ::::. ... . :. '•• ...... 0 Zg:: ::..:...•.::.'.:.:: ': •.: �' , .. ........ . m w .� /: / :: «: ra• o. / .... 1.... �... //^ . a3 9 / / ' N �: O 3 �. / . 7- - - 2 �...r.. 9 /� • o / / v J O/ II O. 9 / - cn �.. O O / q. 4. -,' F- i N �" / 0 / v : • �: ....... f 1 /' �. m t ..:....... �. 3 ..... /, N \ : 927;8 i N..: . ::.. 9 . / / s6 : 22 ^^ O' . g1 j �.' /' / �•,� v N QO N LU �S: :. ' < � 1 SB 91.7. : .,... / :' `s 1.' // �'r 0 0 0 Z > _.- $, 45 a \S.? I � � � co o N :: v / �b` : / ul Go M O O N : .-, '. 929:7 � . . . �/ �, �[ rn p rn rn °\ .. '. 918:8 •..S SB-23 P : ::: I II rn II II SB-24.. ROPOS �I ,C\ ` / �! ©US O1 / ../ o Q Q Q :... �n�/. 1 g i L j > > �L s6 /./ W� W 3 tl Q W W m �� '/ // /. t 1 : / o� O O 3 � S 212 �0. Dd� /pro %`/ / :.F /� LEGEND 2 8S /� ��z5 /� /�/. / • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND °' o�` N 7.2 a, b // //° O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET z..... �. o _ 2 o W l s6 I / : /% / �, . "`j ��� DENOTES UTILITY POLE . / %�� DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR /i r 1 I / ' 2`° GW� DENOTES GUY WIRE %/. , . �.') / /� ohw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE t"' .• � : / I ur o: SB DENOTES SETBACK 3 m I : // . o / ,-as � � �- ,,...:': : / wet DENOTES WETLAND .... t r LOT �. /, / / too +--.. wet me :` : 0) o . yr DENOTES 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION �OS �Gi � � //� SA,& 3._ ��\�\ y ........tys�r %/ . /..�... \i . x DENOTES TREE TAG o /f /�� ' -/ ��a`°\r .� /% DENOTES GRAVEL - wB w6 .: S.. N ; / DENOTES BITUMINOUS _-- N / 1 1� / 4 ry16 ' . �� 1 `' o MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY as �� soot // `� /. _ ,sue . v : /.:' (d) DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT \.. I �. ..:'s � // . �`�� (m) =DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT 0 1 se o0 :.• I ��`� BENCHMARK 0 0\�� 1 .._. ... we �wB.... V: .• % BASIS FOR EL VATION: NAVD 88 E �� i1...:::: ,t::% `' ` "` / � /' 1. Anoka Coun Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 wet ............. �' y i tY m " �'''� cry' / / 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 :;.... .: 92'� �N BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY \ :' :f / / ' / wo \ .M::::: / :a s \ tee' :::::.: \ �� / \ i \ ��' V / ... i . : of �P / .1" ...: // EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION $.. g 3' c Cj�G\ !`�` r .. .: / F,O % / That art of Government Lot 8, Section 35 Townshi 31, Ran a 22, I In Westerl of / P P 9 Y 9 Y / \/ the Westerly Right -of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet i \ o / of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of ` `� °` / / the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. 8 M. \ / \ N \\ r." ,.- / �,L"` .. AND /. ' That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, NOTES: .::: .:` /- Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: o ..:i>:'.. (� /- /:: :' Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of - Field work done June thru October of 2016. N89' :... . >f / / the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35 thence North at - Wetland information rovided from Midwest Natural ` right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to P I94 Gw �l Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as :;" iooyr . / : : the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7• thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, i.. a�, ' / 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point part of this survey. SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7-/89 70 - �� of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 Meas=S89'20'13"E t:. .f ' seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, Deed=N89'52'21"E /' ::• • 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the ,no / Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. r) o w : / / ` ::. . NN I)Ih^ . / :' II II 4) N -0 O �: I hereb certif that this Ian, sketch or re ort was re ared b ° Y y P P P P y JOB #15074 o z me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed • : � Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. S . ,,,--� Revised: 12-8-21 (city comments) ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ : ; - �O Revised: 9-22-21 (city comments) ... / Revised: 8-3-21 (city comments) Blaine, MN 55449 •• _ S1/4 Cor. Sec. N-DOT 22 / Revised: 5-20-21 (city comments) / (Derived from MN -DOT Plans & Milner Corley Revised: 11 24 20 (city comments) 7V3-238-6278 �s.acrelandsurvey gmail.com S89.12'41"E / Held notes which shows an IP in -place al corner) _ Revised: 5-26-20 (trees) 2611.13 _ - NO MON. FOUND SW Cor. Sec. .) S89.12'41 "E 327.94 - SHEET S4 I I I I I I I I I I (Cast Iron Mon.) Date: 4-10-20 Re No. 44655 0 , 2 3 4 s 6 � a s 10 „ 12 13 14 1s 1s 17 18 1s zo JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER 9• GROSS/CONTIGUOUS AREA of "AMELIA WOODS" FOR TJB HOMES, INC. �l' iLLy v z T J �k9 4 � iTH RD v m Y�C Ay HnLLYDR 21 VICINITY MAP BIRCH 5'f 6 41'H S i 'PEfL111G RO'Rpu-!�,� 4 TTEC 'k L6 le � � I 1 F� ti J O 6P__d& LINO LAKES, MN NO SCALE I FOR I l 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). I y I Z o F I0 a W cn la. U O 0 m a O 0 f E c ec o � c J zin I 1 / I / _2625.37 N89.27'46"W do Ij /4 4�89;&7'AVr 111 22 --E-WI/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O� (Cast Iron Monument) J O� �O 1 13 (v v �Q• O �v a, N aloo N � 5? / zzzz z / W Coo CN ao N d j Y a m a; ad I 11 It rn I Z `- z g O O 1= i= U w w Q� 11 Q 1 0 1 i o o 3 CID 0 loox= SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7"/89 70 Meas=S89'20'13"E Deed=N89'52'21 "E raj o W NN o �2 r2 ' °a)Z �oZ j _ S1/4 Cor. Sec. 35-31-22 / S89°1241 "E 2611.13 - / / (Derived from MN -DOT Plans & Milner Carley field notes which shows an IP in -place a corner) NO MON. FOUND _ Cor. Sec. .) �- (C (Cast Iron Mon.) S89'12'41 "E 327.94 ' O I L \\ I a) \ w ° \ C Q Z ° c O O W� (n/_\ t Z a)L J L_// L/ L/ o ° O o T L p N O / I 0 / (n U Z j, m Ej- rS (n O 4110 _ a a) Ln o c o N Lo O c t� 0 O ° ° o J ° a�i 950.4 0Q'a10A / � N89°22'59"W m a t `�-' Z J �' m cF 9�22'59"FQc0Q�eS�e�'` 443± NORTH LINE GOV'T LOTi8 9.79° v �94U949Q •`V 950.0 \3 N89'2259"W- 1. Q 0 W g I R S 2 2 / I 9 2 6o 0 / 0 .3 C) .5 _ H 4 /a / o 9 0N z / rn 3 co � o / 0 5 25.7 - / CV18RC 1 0_4 W�� 1 , \ 0 928.8 u CV -BURIED? o� `0 �, /� ,moo 0jo�• /U o° a \�0 g .6 C\ / 4 / in e tl ' s nt / / ti o /e - p p / / � t -ko / w / 1 7 8.0 V18RCP / e 0. 923.1 / CVI8RCP / '710 / (O e 2 / 9 I / .0 N89027'46"W / ! 1 1 Lo N f / a i � ob N 7-- �� z / 9 0 ` �^/ / "S / q' ry// / 015 �02 'Q / tiw / AREA CALCULATIONS Lot 1 = ±438,525 sq. ft. (f10.07 acres) 2 / , � �GJ Buildiable/Contigious = f9.31 acres -3 b� / tiw / Lot 2 = ±438,876 sq. ft. (f10.08 acres) Buildable/Contigous = f6.71 acres " q�oAD Lot 3 = ±442,356 sq. ft. (f10.16 acres) Buildable/Contigious = f9.55 acres s O �"/ Lot 4 = ±459,570 sq. ft. (f10.55 acres) Buildable/Contigious = f6.14 acres LEGEND /'� • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES UTILITY POLE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR GWDENOTES GUY WIRE ohw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE ° DENOTES SETBACK - / wet DENOTES WETLAND e o / looyr DENOTES 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION S 4V DENOTES TREE TAG DENOTES GROSS LAND AREA 6 DENOTES BUILDABLE/CONTIGIOUS LAND AREA MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY (d) = DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT tiw ' BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 / County 1. Anoka Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 tY 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 4 / BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY 17 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That art of Government Lot 8 Section 35 Township 31 Range 22 lying Westerly of / P P � 9 � Y 9 Y / the Westerly Right -of -Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of 17 the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. AND That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, NOTES: Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of - Field work done June thru October of 2016. 17 / the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35; thence North at - Wetland information provided from Midwest Natural right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as -/ the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, part of this survey. 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, / 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. JOB #15074 ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ Blaine, MN 55449 „ - 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurvey gmail.com SHEETS5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 PRIVATE EASEMENT EXHIBIT ��0� if 99 CO g LRRt RMtLIR VVUUUD FOR: TJB HOMES, INC. VICINITY MAP d� `:ILL5 PH`H� r 1F,L Uf! EIRCFJ. ST EIRCH Sr h .- w cp u 21' 84 i F RTH RD . -' ic`.R 1.1'� N LflHol HOLLYDR 4" i. i.,/. OTTER Lqj FCR F hL LSD I Q \ - `�r °w _• tiEw �. 12. Q Fy O� 6T. [, a ra jr f, �"Ab,. J LINO LAKES, MN NO SCALE WLn�-0 �_� 0 Q r\ A I r\ X U) z / / / \ L / L / f _ N O 0 N L / L _ \ / \ / L T�� °—_°� �inUz (D T 00 o_ - 0 ) / C 6 N O a w z -O � ° 0 '0 � J Cn o ✓ N89�22'59"W m °' O O Z O O cn °n' ° °s'ea eA2 Q o / / L C5 89 22 59 -- Il + NORTH LINE GOV'T LOT18 �� X 9� 6 443_ :'� 950.0 949.7 —4 �3 r Pro osed Trail Esmt. I N89'2259"W N89'22'S9"W t425' %/ 9 �II / N �J �1O`L�s' -� 00� FENCE LINE 21.1 FT SO. OF LINE 492.52 OO Ord ry^O GRAVEL EDGE 24.0 S0. OF LINE N89.22'59"W 2 / C1Q p / NORTH CD c5 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 CD LOT 1 0� ' ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 100ft. BLOCK 1 � BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA \ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). o O (n Z o F IZ a 9 M. a � o ° � o E o `o ° 9Q J � c J z I ' Z / I / /jV _2625.37 N8927'46"W ti0 /4 G89*7'416!iH 22 --E—WI/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O� ast Iron Monument) I J O� 130- v Z !v v V Q� o� N 00 N co 00 GO CO zzzz z % '- o O N W 00 0 rnorn� o �m z 0= z:! °' w w ce QW w C/) 3 0 o o a 4 rt (0 o rn 0 CD CD 3 O wet wet 3 WB WB ° we wet � �wet�- 3 ° 3 j / IV6(o �O O N89'13"W - ' 194- ° 8M -' SOUTH LINE GOT LOT 7 "//'89 70 '' / — Meas=S89°20'13"E / Deed=N89`52'21 "E now / w-0O N 0 z o- _ S1/4 Car. Sec. 35-31-22 � " (Derived from MN —DOT Plans & Milner Carley S89'12 41 E / field notes which shows on IP in —place o comer) 2611.13 NO MON. FOUND Sw Car. sec. 35 (Cast Iron Mon.) S89'12'41 "E 327.94 -' ON mca we l p r7 wet o AL 3 1 718' S89'55'55"W AL 0 \ (1 -5 O /C; �^0 g /� apt ,I, 3 ]IIIL ;aM O 8M �- A7 841 lei 8M m / t O� LOT 2 CD- °� C� N / AL �0 844 AL AIL AL w0 / -ko wet �gM en w� S89'49'10"W/ 'T'- _ 'Nat 1an9 - ° ±976 AL A'0 WB we o / 3 V 2621.91 - .0 N89027'46"W / I / \ LO / CO / ` � a N z / LOT 3 / ° _ / U 4c / PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT: BLOCK 1 �`� ' w / A easement for ingress/egress purposes over, under and accross that part of Lot 1, Block 1, LAKE AMELIA WOODS (unrecorded), Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds N�g1845"E S�4j�� -p� 3o�/ ~/ West, assumed bearing along the north line of said / Lot 1, 390.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 37 "� minutes 01 seconds West, 24.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds East, 383.22 feet to the east line of said Lot 1; thence op mil/ / , northeasterly, along said east line of Lot 1, 24.94 . to the point of beginning. PROPOSED TRAIL EASEMENT: � A trail easement over and across the easterly 20.00 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, LAKE AMELIA WOODS, Anoka County, also lying northerly and easterly of the 0 /off following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1; thence South 16 degrees 23 minutes 06 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Lot 1, 45.72 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds West, 492.52 feet; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 01 seconds West, 38.70 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds West, 425 feet more or less to the easterly shore of Lake Amelia and said line there / terminating. / LOT 4 o / ` rv�LAND USAGE URBAN RESERVE a 60 LEGEND 0 / tiw DENOTES PROPOSED TRAIL EASEMENT BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 co, / A 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 40 / BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY / EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of Government Lot 8, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the Westerly Right —of —Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet ' of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. / AND / That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, NOTES: / Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of — Field work done June thru October of 2016. / the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35; thence North at — Wetland information provided from Midwest Natural right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to Resources, Inc. No field locates have been completed as the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, part of this survey. 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point / of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds East 803.9 feet to the Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. / / I hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by JOB #15074 me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ Is. Blaine, MN 55449 „ — III JOSHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 12-8-21 Reg. No. 44655 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurveygmail.comSHEET S6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 Ill 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ++ +++ +++++ + / fit+ + \ 1+++++++++++++� + +++++++++ + + + We + + + + + + + + + + + + /+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++++++++++ +�i+ ++++++++++....... + .++F++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++; ++++++++++++++++J + + ++i+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +/+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .. +` + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++� LAKE AMELIA +++y++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + ++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + 1$�F + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / f + +++++++++++ + ++++++++++++++++,+\+ + +++++++++�+++++++ — OHW ELEV = 908.1 (NGVD 29) +++++++++ ++++++W� +++++++++ -�o++ ++++++++++++++ +++ +.,� + + + + , + - 3 NAVD 88 « + + + + + +++'+++++\ 100-YR HWL ELEV = 910.0 (NGVD 29) /+ + ..,�,.� ���-.�_ �. + + + + + = 910.2 (NAVD 88) I� + + + + r =-+� �-+, o K+ + + + + , + I«ty- +fin + 1 1•, y� + + r +++++++++++ I ++++tb } «++++- i I I i1F t+I.�+ +++++++ 1 • + + +++ 1 \ \ , +�� \ _. ►+ +1} \ \ + + + + + + . + + + + + + # # + # + + ++-.:-'ems } + �, # + + # �+ + + + + + + + + + + + # + + « +\ « + +�++ �+ ++� r +r+ + # # # + + +fie +•�+ + + + + + + + + +7+ + + t« + + ♦ + + + + + + + + + + + + # « # + + # + + 4`+-� +-.-+ + + + # + # + + + T ! + + 4 + + «++-- ti 7Sfl,+a++##st+ ♦++� II Pr,pnin BITUMINOUS ROAD PROPERTY LINE HOUSE / DRIVEWAY PAD RIGHT-OF-WAY P A PR. SEPTIC AREAS PROPOSED CONTOUR BENCHMARKS Anoka Cty Benchmark No. 3005, Elev = 930.19 (NAVD 88) MNDOT Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset, Elev=941.08 (NAVD 88) STORMWATER BMP EXISTING CONTOUR 1I� WETLAND SB SETBACK + + WETLAND BUFFER EASEMENT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE set WETLAND EDGE ROCK RIPRAP, RANDOM CRUSHED we WETLAND BUFFER EDGE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 00vr LAKE AMELIA 100-YR HWL (910.2 NAVD 88) (FLOODPLAIN) Lr_LLLL LLLL' LL TURF MAINTENANCE ACCESS SF SILT FENCE, PA OR MS LLLLLL ° ° [ ❑ ❑ C SLOPE > 15% (PROPOSED) DRAINAGE DIRECTION ti # f � / �� )III l # � ++� + + � SLOPE 15% (EXISTING) _ �� r ++ + > �Zf 5��i 1 1 11111 IIIf_ 11 \ '�+# }+'+ IIJI f,� �+ + + \ JI _ / 1 \ f/ j /�) �+ +'+'. + �� PROPOSED WELL LOCATION + —_> \ ` I ---_ �� —~ �Iil11I II 11f11 {-/ r'n_1 I++ r�l 1011."'It I �++ ++ +++++ 111 �f 1 +++ + + ++ ++4 +.+ + «++++ \ \ \ \ \ J+++ +•+++++\+ \ � _ � PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DRIVEWAY 1-1 \ \ \ \ _ \ \ \ \ ` ` \ \ \� \ — 1• `�� I % 11 �'� • 4 `++ +,17 JI +++ •r \ r++rr++♦+r+ + + + +'k + + + + + + + + + r W \\ \\ \ �\ '_- , I ` \` \ _ ' `\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ r \ `\ \ \ \\•� f/ f I % f -� Il/�1� 1 IIII I /I1 '/l111 11 'I1 / / // 1-+:J�_•e"3r. 'll.. +++ +r+++ +) ' '/� .• f +Wet w4 + + +F}•� r+ ++_ +` P'I II ++ + + yk+A\ + + r + +++± {a w ++ �+�++ +• �t+ + + ++ + + r r + + + + + + + • + +�I + + + + + / 7� -.er + + �« 7 .� + �� + T. + + �r�y + + P + + + + + + + + + +T� ,}�-r *�+ + + + + + + + + A + + + ♦ + + + - \ \ \ -s — \ \ � `l-'' / f �� 1 I + I \ 1 ' , � •�,;�;::.�;:;s:i� • � i ` • + a , � + � + + + + + +�{ + +•. + + + + k�Q. + J .r + + + + + + + + t�, + « + 1 + + .-� \ \ \ _ ` , \ \ \ \ \ \ �r r% li 1 1111 / �- •e;:'=%'••e •� •:_`++ �.+ 1++++ 1:'� \ r+++ + +a+ rf +++�+,+++ ++++++++++++++++ f+++a♦+r+r+++ z.+.+ ++r+r++ .'++ +++ + \ \ +++ r` + * ih- .+ . + + + + + + « / — 1 \ - \\\ �\ ` \\ \\ `} \\ \ • \ _\ [\ \ �\ ` \ • \ , �- ! \,5� } } I } 1 ` ` J/ 1'1�11'' I1/ /\ /1 1 1 f 1 I 1 r`\- - ,+': rV'.+o- fl + �I},+++f + -\ 9 \i 1 ++ + + +++ + \++ +r -++f. ieti]+ � ++++«+ + ++♦♦r+ +++++• iL i++ 1++++ V� yl �1 1 f_ ++ +++p'+/+ +*/`+++'! rk+Frt- +++* $S � ++ +♦t4 + .f++l ff ++` +++i, ZJ 4. i+ + + g1t I� I } �= N `� r++�'+r+1++I++ 44+{++ }+ a�;f i\_ \ +r+ + + + +�}� + + + + + + !;,.,+ +f+ + -Y + + y r---r -+- t + a + + XZ NIL CIVIL METHODS, INC. PO Box 28038 St. Paul, MN 55128 763.210.5713 1 www.civiImethods.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: 12-03-2021 KENT E BRANDER LIC. NO.: 44578 DESIGNED: KEB DRAWN: KEB CHECKED: DMP DATE / REVISION: 10-22-2020 PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 02-22-2020 ADDED FLOOD ELEVATION INFO PER CITY COMMENTS 09-22-2020 ADDITIONAL REVISIONS PER CITY AND OTHER AGENCY COMMENTS 12-03-2021 ADDITIONAL REVISIONS PER CITY AND OTHER AGENCY COMMENTS OWNER: "t ++ + + + + +�,+-+ + sQ I f TJB HOMES 9100 BALTIMORE ST. STE 102 BLAINE MN 55449 TITLE: I Cn 0 100 200 Feet SITE GRADING - OVERALL LAKE AMELIA WOODS LINO LAKES, MN SHEET NO: C05 CITY OF LINO LAKES LAKE AMELIA WOODS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That CB Property, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owners of the following described property: That part of Government Lot 8, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the Westerly Right —of —Way line of County Road No. 54, except the North 14.70 feet of said Government Lot lying Easterly of the Southerly extension of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35. AND CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, this day of 20 That part of Government Lot 7, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Section 35, 327.94 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35; thence CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA North at right angles to the South line of said Section 35 for a distance of 1,328.0 feet to the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, 21 seconds East on the Southerly line of said Government Lot 7, 89.7 feet to point of beginning of line to be described; thence North 27 degrees 00 minutes 57 seconds East, 523.59 feet; thence North 32 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, 229.41 feet; thence North 33 degrees 22 minutes 24 By: Mayor By: City Clerk seconds East 803.9 feet to the Northerly line of said Government Lot 7 and there terminating. EXCEPT that part taken for highway and as shown in deed Doc. No. 609249. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LAKE AMELIA WOODS and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said CB Property, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of Signed: CB Property, LLC 20 COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 By: , Clerk Charles F. Gitzen Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 35, TWP. 31, RN G. 22 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20____ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this ______ day of _________I 20 John George Commers, Executive manager Property Tax Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA By Deputy COUNTY OF COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by John George Commers of CB Property, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of LAKE AMELIA WOODS was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20____, at _____ o' clock .M. and was duly recorded as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles I Joshua P. Schneider do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on By Deputy this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of 20 Joshua P. Schneider, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 44655 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Joshua P Schneider. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires ACRE LAND SURVEYING P ,,, Blaine, MN 55449 r1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 I71 112 113 114 19 120 6HrzrzT 1 Orc 3 SHEETS LAKE AMELIA WOODS f 19.90'—Derived from MC—Bloom's Add. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND .iL DENOTES WETLAND 0 DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT I 0 DENOTES MONUMENT TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, A 1 /2 INCH (n o BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP i S INSCRIBED 44655 MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY 9 N o (d) =DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT x m (m) = DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT r c E 0 z BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). ACRE LAND SURVEYING ; ; 19 Blaine, MN 55449 rr 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 I11 112 113 114 19 120 I � I 0 � m c J o \ c tj z r i z % / I � 2625.37 N89.27'46"W S89.27'46"E--E—W7/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys O� W1/4 Cor. Sec. 35-31-22 (Cast Iron Monument) O�V� J �o N/ (v v Q o v P O� �v CITY OF LINO LAKES O ; -0 o o o o / COUNTY OF ANOKA ° Z a \r A A �� /n r\ r X p z co SEC. 35, TWP. 31, RN G. 22 - p — N :2L J L 0 0 O _ O T L 0 O OJ / O � m / C/) 0 � > O w - n —0p / z p - + c m � w '— a O Z� C N o c Q O `n" o _ro (1) ° -0° c N89022'59"W m Q Z J `� m S89022'59"E — — — — — 443± NORTH LINE GOV'T LOTi 8 9.79 e — 950.0 949 7490.63 r'p — — — 151.48— �1 i 485.43 D \\ /j - Drainage & Utility Easement-- — ro / 0 IclI / I� o 90.o , 00 C' oa Q L. \ Z N \� LL I / LOT 1 m /110 BLOCK 1 ' \\� ! Q / / S87_22'18'' 283.08 ` o / \ ; T — ` wets N26. ,,r I 56.49 I �, T �o AIL�� N04°04'05"E �� 10 / � 257.31 _ �,e� 0.0+1 � 4° ±718—S89.55'55 W— . — . — . — 1--.—.—i—.— H3 ——464.93.—.—., Od �o.F, / i I �0<,� �� �y �o s �\ Doge / / �v ,Q �O�\ �0� ,/ o1� S1 52 34 —I /� �OtdN 'v 2 46j'08"w-40 \� N8012»w_ �*eti LOT 2 ! /''� Q)C �` 82 7 Drainage & Utility Easement I N//�^ Co CIO / / AL / / AL yeti / -- - j C��e>L N AL . o ��. S05°4733.78 �/' AIL �eM % \te oM�� 1041 of PG aI I°ng t / 181.19 — — —� S8 t9760"W 3 / 193.05 - i \ �370.3034 / Co / f � off" / 193.2g 2621.91 / _ ,� _ � 4.09 N89c)27'46"W / / 4?CIV �0/CD' it / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 1 LOT 3 I I i2 / 0 1 10 0 Orl o BLOCK 1 e ' 1 / / / � ' NO SCALE BEING 10 FEET WIDE ABUTTING SIDE PROPERTY LINES \ / '�P�/ AND RIGHTS —OF —WAY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, Cp_/. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. I 7a 45n C�. / i N�g•14 3722.. f\� / 06 / SHEET 2 Or- 3 SHEETS CITY OF LINO LAKES LAKE AMELIA WOODS NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100ft. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND �111c DENOTES WETLAND 0 DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT 0 DENOTES MONUMENT TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT, A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 44655 MC = DENOTES MEASUREMENT FROM MILNER CARLEY (d) = DENOTES DEED OR RECORD MEASUREMENT (m) = DENOTES FIELD MEASUREMENT BENCHMARK BASIS FOR ELEVATION: NAVD 88 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 3005- With an Elevation of 930.19 2. MnDot Benchmark Otter Mndt Reset- With an Elevation of 941.08 BENCHMARKS ARE NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY BASIS FOR BEARINGS: NAD83 (1996) (VIA REAL TIME GPS MEASUREMENTS UTILITIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VRS NETWORK). ACRE LAND SURVEYING ; ; 19 Blaine, MN 55449 rr 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 I11 112 113 114 i9 120 i� i o 0 0 z a o 0 m a M UE o o � z � m J o Z J I z % / I 2625.37 N89'27'46"W �o S89'27'46"E--E—WI/4 Line Derived from Milner/Carley Surveys 011 W1/4 Car. Sec. 35-31-22 � (Cast Iron Monument) I .600 SEC. AL AL' at P/ S89'49'10"W / ±976' 807.34 370.30 \, I I co, / p V 4.09 N89-27'4611W / I —? II ° / Q) a / LL off. Cori ti pw / 6.0 /Q -- 53.16 h S28 o p 42'06 »w �� /c II \s(5),& —/�e� �Dy wet o /`4 ryro10 O� / 3 % rt o)/ry p ` P qj co / Ov o•CV A- / N89'20'13"W _ 194± � p DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: SOUTH LINE GOV'T LOT 7- 89.70 Meas=S89`20'13"E t Deed=N89°52'21 "E / 10 0 10-1 0 bow / — L_.—.--.—.— rn / CN PNM - / o / NO SCALE / o Z BEING 10 FEET WIDE ABUTTING SIDE PROPERTY LINES AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. S K _ _ S1/4 Car. Sec. 35-31-22 / / " (Derived from MN —DOT Plans & Milner Carley S89'12 41 E / field notes which shows an IP In —place a comer) 2611.13 _A NO MON. FOUND SW Co -Sec. 35 (Cast Iron Mon.) S897 2'41 "E 327.94- COUNTY OF ANOKA 35, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 SHMET 3 Or- 3 SHMETS PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: January 12, 2022 REQUEST: Robinson Property PUD Concept Plan Review CASE NUMBER: PC2021-002 APPLICANT: Integrate Properties, LLC Attn: Ian Peterson 6980 Sand Ridge Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 OWNER: Robinson Landscaping, Inc. Attn: Harold Robinson 310 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: December 16, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: February 14, 2022 120-Day Review Deadline: April 15, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: January 4, 2022 Park Board Meeting: January 5, 2022 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 12, 2022 City Council Work Session: February 7, 2022 City Council Meeting: N/A BACKGROUND The applicant, Integrate Properties, LLC, submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan review. The proposed development is a master planned residential community located on the Robinson property south of CSAH 14 (Main Street) and east of CR 53 (Sunset Avenue). The site contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 157 gross acres and consists of mix of housing types totaling 707 housing units. Staff notes the concept plan says 710 housing units but the count totals 707. Future land use applications may include: oo Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Utility Staging Area o Move one (1) parcel (PID #07-31-22-22-0001) from Stage l B (2025- 2030) to Stage IA (2018-2025) oo Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) oo Rezone property from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development oo PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat oo PUD Final Plan/Final Plat This staff report is based on the following submittals: oo Concept Plan Submittal Narrative prepared by Integrate Properties, LLC dated December 13, 2021 oo ALTA Survey prepared by Alliant Engineering dated October 29, 2021 oo Robinson Property Concept Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 oo Robinson Property Concept Plan -Site Rendering Graphic prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 oo Robinson Property Surrounding Area Map prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 ANALYSIS History In October 2006, a concept plan for Robinson Lakes was reviewed at a Council Work Session. The concept plan included 680 acres of Robinson property located both north and south of Main Street. The plan included a residential mix of single family homes, multi -family and active adult multi -family. Lakes, open space and greenway system with parks and trails were incorporated throughout the development. Unfortunately, due to the onset of housing recession, this project never moved forward. Current Proposal The current proposal includes 157 acres of Robinson property that is south of Main Street. The applicant is proposing the following mix of residential unit types: Housing Type Lot Width # Units Single Family Lots = 65 ft 98 Single Family Lots = 55 ft 82 Single Family Lots = 50 ft 83 Townhomes (Back to Back) = 28 ft 64 Townhomes (Row) = 24 ft 100 Multi -Family Housing = (14 buildings x 20 units) TBD 280 TOTALjig707 Single family detached home neighborhoods are located in the northwest section and southeast quadrant of the site. The townhome neighborhood is centrally located on the east side. A gated multi -family rental neighborhood and clubhouse are located in the northeast quadrant of the site. Trails, sidewalks, stormwater ponds and lakes are included throughout the development. The entire site will be mass graded in one (1) phase to create stormwater ponds and lakes. Neighborhood construction would be phased. Mass grading anticipated to start Winter 2023 with home construction anticipated to begin July 2023. Full build will be phased over 4 to 5 years. Please see the attached applicant's narrative for a detailed description of the project. Existing Conditions The predominant existing land use is agricultural related to Robinson Sod Farm. The MLCCS classification is sod on hydric soils. Public ditch ACD 10-22-32 and private ditches drain the site south. Wetlands appear to be located along the ditch corridors. A majority of the site is in the floodplain and mitigation will be utilized for stormwater management (lakes and ponds), creation of a multi -functional greenway system (parks and trails) and providing fill for house pads, streets and other upland areas. A 100ft wide pipeline easement and a 90ft wide transmission utility bisects the southeast quadrant of the site. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Agricultural Mix of Residential Densities South PUD (Century Agricultural Medium Density Farm North) East R, Rural Rural Residential High Density & Low Density FR, Farm LDR, Low Density West Residence Wetland/Open Space Residential (City of Blaine) Surrounding land uses include medium density single family detached homes and townhomes to the south in Century Farms North. Larger rural residential lots exist to the east and to the southeast along Carl Street. Comprehensive Plan and Housing Density The 157 acre site has multiple land use designations per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan creating somewhat of a checkerboard patterned look. These land uses include low density, medium density, high density and planned residential/commercial. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is located in Planning District 2 and includes Planned Residential/Commercial areas. The Comprehensive Plan states: oo "Planning District 2 includes Planned Residential/Commercial areas. o The Robinson Farm and Main Street site is planned to accommodate an 80/20 percent mix of residential and commercial. While allowed in all areas, commercial development will be required in at least one quadrant. To ensure implementation the City may choose to rezone land to a compatible neighborhood commercial zoning district upon completion of a corridor plan. A Master Plan for the Main Street Corridor between Sunset Avenue and 4th Avenue should be completed." It is important to note the 80/20 percent mix is related only to the approximate 40 acres of land guided for Planned Residential Commercial. The Robinson Farm and Main Street site referenced in the Comprehensive Plan includes property on both the north and south side of Main Street. The subject site for this PUD Concept Plan proposal is only on the south side of Main Street and would not necessarily require a commercial component. The following chart summarizes the site's general density range per gross and net acres: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Gross Acres Net Acres Allowed Units per Acre Allowed # Units Low High Low j High Low Density Res 77.4 64.5 1.6 3.0 103 194 Medium Density Res 19.9 17.8 4.0 6.0 71 107 High Density Res 39.8 35.7 6.0 8.0 214 285 Planned Res / Comm 19.9 17.8 8.0 10.0 143 178 TOTAL 157.1 135.8 531 764 GROSS DENSITY 3.4 4.9 NET DENSITY 3.9 5.6 The preliminary density ranges would be 3.9 to 5.6 units per net acre which equates to 531 to 764 housing units. The applicant is proposing 707 housing units which is consistent with the density range. It should be noted that net acreage will be re -calculated based on post -development during the preliminary plat process. al Gateway Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan & Planning District 2, a gateway shall be planned and created on the south side of Main Street (CSAH 14) at Sunset Road (CR 53). Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to allow for a variety of lot widths and housing types. The applicant would need to provide additional public benefit in order to be considered for PUD zoning. Examples could be open space, enhanced greenway corridor, wetland restoration, additional wetland buffers, higher architectural & building standards etc. Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per Low density, Medium density, High density and 2040 Comp Plan planned residential/commercial Utility Staging Area Stage IA (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Zoning Requirements and Standards Baseline/Conventional Zoning Districts As with any PUD, the City starts with the conventional zoning district as the baseline. The following chart provides the 2040 Comprehensive Plan -Land Use Designation and the coinciding Baseline/Conventional Zoning District: 5 2040 Comp Plan Land Use Gross Acres Coinciding BasGne/ Conventional Zoning District Housing Type Lot Width (ft) Lot Depth (ft) Lot Size (st) Low Density Res 77 R-1, single Family single family 80 135 10,800 R-IX,SingleFa Executive single farnily 90 135 12,825 R-2, Two Farnily Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 1 150 7,500 Medium Density Re 20 R-2, Two Farnily Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 150 7,500 R-3, Medium Density Residential two-fa(unit lot) 50 140 1 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome 24 NA NA High Density Res 40 R-4, High Density Residential two -fa (unit lot) 50 120 6,000 R-4, Higb Density Residential townhome or other multi -family NA NA CIA Planned Res/Comm 20 R-4, High Density Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 120 6,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome or other rn ahi-family NA NA NA TOTAL = 157 Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. The proposed lot widths for the detached single family homes are 50ft, 55ft and 65ft. The proposed townhome lot widths are 24ft. PUD flexibility would be required for the 50ft and 55ft wide single family lots. Setbacks The following chart compares the standard City ordinance requirements to the proposed setbacks. Residential Single City Ordinance Proposed Setbacks Family Requirement Front Yard R-1 = 30ft 25 ft R-2 = 25ft R-1 & R-2 = 5ft garage /lOft house Side Yard 5ft garage/ or 1Oft house 7.5ft/7.5ft Side Yard Setback to R-1 = 30ft 25ft Right of Way R-2 = 25ft Setback to County Road 40ft 50ft Townhomes City Ordinance Proposed Distance 0 Private driveway length 25fta 22ft Private driveway width 26ft 24 ft back to back Building separation loft 20ft 'The R-2 district requires a 25ft house setback which would provide a 25ft long driveway More detailed information is required to analyze each lot in regards to lot sizes, lot widths and depths and setbacks. PUD flexibility would be required to allow for reduced setbacks. Building Design Standards The applicant's narrative includes renderings of the proposed housing products. More detailed information will be required to fully analyze each housing product. The building design standards of the residential zoning districts shall be used as the starting baseline for each housing product in regards to floor area, utility area, garages etc. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of single family lots, townhome lots and multi -family building lots. The lots vary in width, depth and lot size as may be allowed per the PUD flexibility. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Per City Code Section 1001.097 (1) Length. The maximum length of blocks shall be 1,500 feet and the minimum length 400 feet. Blocks over 900 feet long may require pedestrianways at least ten feet wide at their approximate center. The use of additional pedestrianways to schools, parks and other destinations may be required. Per the 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails System Plan, local and regional trails are proposed along both the north and south side of CSAH 14 (Main Street). Additional pedestrian ways shall be included to CSAH 14 (Main Street) to provide connectivity to the development. Pedestrian connection and trails to Sunset Avenue are provided at the street and northwest corner of the site. The existing house at 7902 Sunset Avenue should be incorporated into the development as large 2 acre lot. A ghost plat shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat process. Connection of the existing house to municipal utilities shall be evaluated. Streets and Alleys CSAH 14 (Main Street) is Principal Arterial road. CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) is a Major Collector road. Internal roads are local roads intended to serve the site. 7 Per the City's 2040 Transportation Plan and Planning District 2: oo Plan for the extension of Sunset Road (CR 53) north to Pine Street. Development of the Robinson property to the north of Main Street will need to consider this extension. oo Continue to implement the Main Street (CSAH 14) Access Management Study. oo Work with Anoka County on the creation of a new full -access intersection on Main Street at a new road at the 200 block. The concept plan provides a new Main Street full access near the 200 block and is consistent with Access Management Study and the City's Transportation Plan. oo An east/west minor collector road extending to 4th Avenue is required. Per the 2040 Transportation Plan and the Access Management Plan, Robinson Drive is shown to extend east to 4th Avenue as the east/west minor collector. This serves as an important backage road to Main Street (CSAH 14), provides connectivity and efficient emergency response between neighborhoods, and distributes traffic throughout the area. The concept plan shows Robinson Drive extending to the east lot line; however, due a large wetland complex, connection to 4th Avenue at this location may not be viable and it may have to shift north or south. An additional east/west connection to 4th Avenue shall be made at Carl Street. The proposed development shall provide a road connection south to Carl Street and the 2 cul de sacs shall be connected. This would be similar transportation design practices implemented with the Saddle Club development and the connection of Fox Road and the St. Clair Estates connection to Hokah Drive and Sioux Lane. The Carl Street connection is also supported by Lino Lakes Public Safety -Police Division and Fire Division in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response to the entire area. This street connection is further supported by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.096 LAND REQUIREMENTS. (2) Proposed subdivisions shall be coordinated with surrounding properties and/or neighborhoods so that the city as a whole may develop efficiently and harmoniously. § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic N. conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. The access road onto CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) shall be evaluated by Anoka County. Staff Comments: oo Local road right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60 ft wide. oo Cul de sacs shall not exceed 500 ft in length and bulbs shall meet City standards. oo Additional road right of way along CSAH 14 and CR 53 may be required. oo Access and connection to Carl Street shall be evaluated. oo A traffic study shall be required. oo Anoka County Highway Department is in receipt of the concept plan and will provide additional comments on the development. oo More trails shall be incorporated throughout the development. oo Noise impacts shall be evaluated as part of an EAW. Easements Staff Comments: oo Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. oo Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. oo Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The concept plan shows several stormwater management facilities and ponds throughout the development. A stronger multi -purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space shall be incorporated into the development. Pedestrian ways/sidewalks/trails shall be included throughout the development, to CSAH 14 (Main Street) and to CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) to provide connectivity throughout the development. The existing trail in Century Farm North near 7836 Century Trail shall extend to the east into the development. Deeper rear yard buffers along the stormwater ponds and lake shall be incorporated. Utilities Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub -district 2I). Flow is collected southward to MCES Meter M211 and Gravity Interceptor 8361 along North Road which passes southwest through Circle Pines. I The site is located in Utility Staging Area lA (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the one (1) parcel from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage IA (2018-2025) Municipal water and sanitary sewer utilities to serve the development exist along Robinson Drive and Century Trail in Century Trail North. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the City's 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan, this development is within the Century Farm and Behm's Park service areas. A trail to Robinson Drive currently exists between proposed Lots 30-31. A greenway corridor is required along the north -south ditch and an east -west section. The City's Park Plan and Central Anoka County Regional Trail Plan require a regional trail along the south side of CSAH 14 (Main Street). This shall be provided. A proposed on -street bike route is shown along CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue). The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Any required trail construction costs will be credited from the total payment in lieu. A stronger multi -purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space shall be incorporated into the development especially leading into Century Farm park. Pedestrian ways/sidewalks/trails shall be included throughout the development, at a midway point to CSAH 14 (Main Street) and to CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) to provide connectivity throughout the development. The existing trail in Century Farm North near 7836 Century Trail shall extend to the east into the development. A regional trail shall be constructed along the south side of CSAH 14 (Main St). Tree Preservation and Landscaping A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted. Additional landscaping may be required as a condition of the PUD. Environmental Review Record An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required. The threshold computation of unattached units (263) and attached units (444) is greater than one (1). Wetlands Wetlands appear exist along the ditches. A wetland delineation report is required with a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat submittal. Wetland buffers consistent 10 with RCWD regulations (50 ft wide average, monument signs etc.) may be required as part of the PUD. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain on a large portion of the site. Floodplain management shall be incorporated into the overall design of the site. Staff Comments: oo A Base Flood Elevation is required to be determined, using detailed methods acceptable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). oo A FEMA CLOMR and LOMR are required for this site. oo The CLOMR shall be submitted with a PUD Development Stage Plan application. Shoreland District The subject property is not located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Anoka County Highway Department provided comments in the attached email. Anoka County Parks Department recommends the regional trail along the south side of Main Street be installed with this development. Lino Lakes Public Safety The Police Division supports connection of Carl Street, recommends a traffic study, turn lanes and reduction in speed limit along Main Street. The Fire Division also supports the Carl Street connection to improve response times to the entire area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the PUD concept plan on January 4, 2022. General comments included the need for multi -functional greenway system, wider wetland buffers and diverse mix of native plants. City Engineer The City Engineer provided comments in the attached letter dated January 5, 2022. 11 PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat The City's review and comments on the concept plan's relation to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. A land use application for PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be required. The developer should have a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the Planning & Zoning Board. 1. Should a Master Plan for the Main Street Corridor between Sunset Avenue and 4th Avenue be required? 2. Thoughts on PUD flexibility for lot widths, lot sizes and setbacks? ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. 2040 Future Land Use Plan Map 3. 2006 Robinson Lakes Concept Plan 4. 2021 Concept Plan Submittal Narrative 5. ALTA Survey 6. Concept Plan 7. Concept Plan -Graphic Rendering 8. Concept Plan and Surrounding Area 9. WSB City Engineer Memo dated January 5, 2022 10. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated January 5, 2022 11. Anoka County Highway Department email dated January 7, 2022 12 Robinson Property -Site Location &Aerial Map nQ 41, dfl . nom _00 4 It I -4 4, 4 pfy 4,N/ . . . . . . . .... !F AW k ry AL 44*1 Parcels A • CITY 0 F LN0OL 0 KES A -A JO 7 .ADM ir I i n = 600 ft N A December 21, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink vvsb Robinson Property-2040 Land Use Plan C .'Q Q7 m 125th Ave NE r 1241h Ln NE Ll' m c _P.1 z x m � z 4n m a Aft Ln a m E Robinson Dr 123rd Ln n w r z m b�$ a c a N � �= r° Q � ar Carl St Sherwood Ln 121 st Ave N E Greenwood Ln A• GjrQ � prairie View PI f ¢ Century �t WSB & Associates �r C 1 T F D F LINOLAKES Parcels Land Use - 2040 Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Residential / Commercial Office Residential Signature Gateway District Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial Civic and Institutional Parks and Open Space Private Airfield 1 i n = 600 ft N A December 21, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink WSb ..�,. •; ",i. t 4 L F �. . ,u .�� ;-� e .' °. � WETLAND WF. TLAND ;�t � W ' 6' Y. j, � a �� v �)�� u�'::, • E \ WE Y WE (LAND ' �1 !-1 SINGLE FAMILY �. LAKE SINGLE FAMILY LAKE MULn FAMILY oft 1 ;l .Y MULn t� FAMILY INGLE AMILY SINGLE FAMILY POND •, �'',. SINGLE ,u,, _ � F^AHK FAMILY -�. a �,,,.,-' :' !. I' SINGLE `'� FARK 31NGLE - FAMILY "AMILY - FAMILY 1 r S LAKE LAKE SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY �.,-� r �, � _ I v i eC I`G�'/4� ' I t �� ti L � �. a y ti', i '>` � �� I �� i, , 1'I{I I .. di 1 � 3-i-��rL* k'�—I I : I*�' GROSS AREA: f 80 ACRES L,,. �' � PROPOSED ZONING: PUD �`, PROPOSED LAND USE: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ''j F PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS: t1,300-1,700 I PROPOSED GROSS DENSITY: 2-3 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED NET DENSITY: 3-4 UNITS/ACRE ,I L ��: ',_, "I OPEN SPACE DATA: �, . PROPOSED UPLAND OPEN SPACE/PARK AREAS: f65-75 ACRES��i IL.,, . I PROPOSED PONDING: t725-140 ACRES ' n ( '�, LARGE ERISnNG WETLAND AREAS: t20 ACRES ;j^• �. CLUBHOUSE AND NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION AREA: f4 ACRES . '� TOTAL OPEN SPACE: f215-240 ACRES (32-35% OF SITE) I I •� " ,d PROPOSED TRAIL• t7 MILES I:7 ` � R ' . _ _ r Arnv� AnuLr � 1+''�- �nvE A ULT ' POND FUND MULn FAMILY - � - F'APIc -�, �C � POND 1 { - `, ,. I . t,.r I I , n 17 C �.I _ _ I I, .,. AC .. ADULT 1 ? I - ��� � ��'. �_c i I Fn ,r 1- ,•� �I, �� (�:. I! � it , 4' I �� I. '�. , I I � �, +' �a i ! tl, I" I�. �� 7.. . CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE ROBINSON PROPERTY Lino Lakes, Minnesota December 13, 2021 -- a�ill, 1--/ it-�4 �2 .., 27 z� 9 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 1 of 13 Integrate Properties, LLC is pleased to submit the Concept Plan for the Robinson Property south of Main Street. We are interested in obtaining feedback and direction from the Commissions, City Council and City Staff as the development of this property will leave a legacy in the community. Included in this narrative are key items from the City Checklist. DEVELOPMENT TEAM / CONSULTANTS: Attorney: Mr. Jeremy Duehr Fredikson & Byron, PA 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Surveyor: Mr. Peter Goers, PLS Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Land Planning: Mr. Mark Rausch, PE Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Engineering: Mr. Mark Rausch, PE Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Wetlands: Mr. Mark Kjolhaug, PWS Kjolhaug Environmental Services, Inc. 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130 Orono, MN 55331 Environmental: Mr. Kevin Hoffinan Braun Intertec 11001 Hampshire Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55438 Geotechnical: Mr. Henry Vloo, PE Braun Intertec 11001 Hampshire Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55438 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 2 of 13 PROPERTY / DEVELOPMENT SITE INFORMATION: Legal Description: Parcel A The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, EXCEPT the south 250 of the west 250 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Parcel B The south 250 of the west 250 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Address: 310 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN. PIDs: Parcel A: 073122220001 = 37.5115 acres 073122210001 = 39.8440 acres 073122120001 = 39.7865 acres 073122130001 = 39.9127 acres Total Acres "A": = 157.055 acres Parcel B: 073122220002 = 1.4356 acres Total Acres. 158.4903 ac CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 3 of 13 Existing Site Description The development site is currently in use as part of the Robinson Landscaping, Inc. sod farm agricultural use. The property also includes a residence and buildings used for operation of the sod farm. The site topography is very flat with multiple ditches to provide drainage and an irrigation source. The property is bound by Main Street (CSAH 14) to the north and Sunset Ave (CR 53) to the west. We have been working with the Anoka County Highway Department regarding their right of way needs for each roadway and to request preliminary feedback on potential roadway access points. The County has indicated roadway access will be made available to the property, and provided a general guideline for locating new access points as depicted on the Concept Plan. Additionally, the County has requested 75-feet of Right of Way dedication from the centerline of Main Street and 60-feet of Right of Way dedication from the centerline of Sunset Avenue; both requests are depicted on the Concept Plan. Other roadway access points have been provided to the property through the Century Farm development to the south at Cardinal Way, Robinson Drive, and Century Trail. Additionally, a pedestrian trail has been stubbed to the property from Century Farm Addition to the south, just west of the Cardinal Way street connection. Adequate public water and sanitary sewer is available to the property from Century Farm development to the south at Cardinal Way, Robinson Drive, and Century Trail. The development site has been historically used for agriculture and currently has no significant tree removal required to construct the development. Braun Intertec performed a Geotechnical Evaluation Report, dated November 29, 2021, on the site. The results are summarized below, with peat levels ranging from 0.5-feet to 8-feet in depth and water levels ranging from 4-feet to 9-feet in depth. Table 1. Subsurface Profile Summary. Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration ftesistaroms Commentaryand Details Mostly peat with lesser amounts of organic clay, lean Topsoil j clay, and silty sand. Swamp PT, QL, CL, NIA Thicknesses at boring locations ranged from alaout SM 112 to 81/2 feet, Deposits Black and dark brown in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist_ ■ Mixture of poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand Alluvial 5Pr SP-SK 2 to 14 BPF with silt, silty sandy sandy silt, and siIt- Deposits SM, ML Generally brawn to gray in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist to wet_ "Abbrevlations deflned in the attached Descriptive Term Inology of Sall sheet. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 4 of 13 Land use and Zoning Designations tions The development property is guided for several different land uses within the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan including: • Low Density Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential • Planned Residential/Commercial. Land uses for properties adjacent to the site are guided with consistent uses: • To West: City limits with Blaine (Lino Lakes land use N/A) • To North: Includes a similar combination of all 4 land uses on the development site • To East: High density residential and low density residential • To South: Medium density residential and low density residential. The development site is currently zoned entirely as R - Rural. The requested zoning for the site will establish a PUD zoning for the entire development site, compatible and consistent with the City's goals and objectives for the property. The zoning for the properties abutting the site include: • To West: City limits with Blaine (Lino Lakes zoning N/A) • To North: R - Rural • To East: R - Rural • To South: PUD (mixed residential neighborhood) DEVELOPMENT FEEDBACK REQUEST The applicant proposes to provide the City of Lino Lakes with a residential development that includes a variety of housing options catering to all spectrums of consumers from millennials to empty nesters to satisfy the market demand. These housing styles will be grouped together within clusters or pods as follows: • 50-feet wide single-family lots • 55-feet wide single-family lots • 65-feet wide single-family lots • Row style townhomes • Back-to-back style townhomes • Structured multi -family housing The development will create substantial ponding and lake areas that will be an amenity to the various housing types proposed within the project. The main County ditch system will be preserved and protected while the newly created ponding and lakes will provide for stormwater management goals and infrastructure improvements to the adjacent offsite roadway. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 5 of 13 The allowable density range for the property is depicted below in the table by both Property ID and by the Comprehensive Plan Guidance. The density ranges from a minimum of 531 units to a maximum of 764 units at full development. R=NSON FARM: 501-11TH OF MAIN STREET ZPQQCWlPr@h*nSiVr Plan • ig-nd 11$* DMSkVAl 210S 0RGANIIFV 8Y Pi0 PID 11511apAl Zoning Comp Plan GI Acres NekAaea Ili}wo Uniks per Acne Allowed A Un& Low High 1pw High 07-31-22-22 0001 1 A, Rural Law Density Res 37.5115 32 44SI -.5 3.0 -.2 17 p7-31-22 Z1 1 d R Rarst n+6edWm oenso lies 25L76 9.9610 9.9795 c.,:} r.i; 54 2 R. Rural High Density Res SCOA 19.9220 17-9571 6.0 v C :;R 144 .1 R, RuriI Plpaneok4g1(:amm (2596f 9.9610 $.)784 ;{.r} 67-31-22.1Z•0001 7 IC Rural Medium DenSO Res (25%1 9.9466 8.8574 C ? 53 o Ik Purse High dense 11es -W%) 19.8933 17-7149 f,,:} ;; r, 142 5 R. Rural Planned ties j Comm 25961 9,9466 8,874 S : 0 ] 89 -31-22-i3-0001 d R, Rural Low Density Res 39-9127 32-0610 LU % NIFF OFFAL 257,11W 13SJ4499 431 764 GROSS DENSITY 3 , 4,9 NET DENSITY 3y 5.6 aRCAN=8YC126980#,A IVEPL N GLJOVANCE pPlan GFossAcres Net Acres Allowed Units per Acre Allowed it Units Low High Low High Law Density Res 77.4 64.5 1.b 3-0 1.03 194 MCdiumPCnSikxRcs 19,9 17.8 4,0 6.13 71 1137 High Density Res 31.8 35-7 6.0 $_U 214 285 PIa nned Rus I Comm 1.9,9 17,8 6,0 10.0 143 178 11 AL 157.1 135A 531 7ti+1 GROSS DENSITY 3 a {, NET DENSITY R9 5.E DMft r moos arc boWd upon Wet Ao" #Grass ACIP5 - ROW - WE E1045) The proposed Concept Plan provides for a total of 710 units on the site, which falls within the density range for the property provided in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Concept Plan provides for the following diversification of housing types totaling the 710 units: • 65-feet wide Single Family Lots: 98 • 55-feet wide Single Family Lots: 82 • 50-feet wide Single Family Lots: 83 • Row Townhomes: 100 • Rowhomes (Back to Back & Row): 64 • Structured Multi Family Housing: 280 • TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: 710 UNITS We believe the proposed development plan is consistent with the City of Lino Lakes goals for the property. The following is a summary of primary project elements currently proposed: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 6 of 13 • 710 new housing units with a variety of types, sizes and affordability. • Infrastructure improvements to adjacent County roadways. • Public right of way dedication for Main St (CSAH 14) and Sunset Ave (CR 53). • Preservation of most of the onsite ditch/wetland areas. • Wetland buffer creation in accordance with requirements where necessary. • HOA maintained community. • Extension of sanitary sewer and water main for future development to the north and east. • Installation of stormwater management facilities to provide volume control, water quality and rate control for runoff from the new roadway surfaces prior to discharge. • Extension of public trailways and sidewalks for pedestrian connectivity. • Extension of collector roadways for regional transportation use. • Comprehensive development landscape plan with perimeter fencing and landscaping. HOUSING TYPE EXAMPLES 50' wide sinizle-family lots CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 7 of 13 55' wide single-family lots: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 8 of 13 65' wide single-family lots: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 9 of 13 Row style townhomes: 11 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL ROBINSON PROPERTY -mw-- -*A December 13, 2021 Page 10 of 13 11= ,Il`! �1= F'IV ., -:�._,. `'ram � • _ TIMING/PHASING/STAGING The entire site will be mass graded in one phase to allow for the creation of the storm water ponds and lakes. Development of the neighborhood clusters with utilities and streets will be completed in multiple phases based on market demand. Mass grading is anticipated to begin Winter 2023 with the first phase of utilities and streets completed by July 2023. Home construction is anticipated to begin July 2023 with a full build out of the community taking place over four to five years. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully requests feedback and direction on the concept plan and planned unit development from the Commissions, City Council and City Staff. We believe the concept plan will allow for a residential land use consistent with City's goals and objectives for this area and create a community that will enhance Lino Lakes and the surrounding area. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 13 of 13 ou -Q°- ou -ter- err- -O UU N I%4 CD COR. SEC 7, n0 I T. 3/, R. 22 n0 as . as8.o _ n0®- n0 - - �897 897.9 _- 899.0 �98.9 - - - XBW6- =n0 n0 n0 ' - - -- 988 - 9.4 - 9.2 L 899.3 899.4 / �900.3 �900.2 �y00.1- �900.1 90o.0 - - - - -- - I I - PUBLIC ° 11 598.53 BIT SURFACE 900 S -G �901.2�9012 �901- -G _ 00.9 -- - - - - - MAIN STREET C.S.A.H. NO. 14 0 c9 3 896.9 F § T' 48" RCP BIT SURFACE I ti NVVCOR. SEC 7 T N 900 - - - 895. 894.8 95.2 895.1 95.1 4 3 F �'R` 595.OF0 FO FO 895.8 - I I 1917 g I 894-r--�� R. 22 o �900.2 - 0 �(1f�F0 894.9 FO FO FO FOR FO u X�94.9 jwn*7 as4.5 - gg�` • I r900.6 P`G - - - - F asa.a -\-894 8 - Xssa q �� ay��� 30"_CMP I I C� .7 �900.8 - -- r900.8 �900.8 - - Fo FO 898 FO9 895.0 a 8sa.7 ass.1 may . �"' - L �E l/4OF 896 - _ 3 % � I S9�. M v-89�.877.3 Nm-5 897.3 ?CMP X897.z X� %'o 89� �(F�� .894` sus X894.8 X894.8 895_I 5. 4F 4. X894.8 8 X894.6 X894.8 X894.8 X894.7 X894.6 X894.6 X895.5 896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.3 X8 C P� I I NV=893.09-Fo FoFo F �ass.3 8 NW l 4 OF EC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 IN 92. 3 ag I co \ ..a�7.6 �ass.z 895.3- - _ - - Sg2.a - asa s - ss.1 N LINE OF W 114 OF THE . 0 - H o fi - __ _-- PL /��4 - - - - - T _ _ _ \ _ - - - - - - �`' ' / 241' CM 4"-CMP_- _N W 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 899 I X896.9 Xa96.9 00 X897.7 - �� X895.5 X895.7 ITCH- 896.0 89� S TRA TT B D L X896.0 X895.�4" 8.1 8 '696.5 INV= 91.33 -891 X89 .2 X4895.8 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.2 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.3 X895.1 X894.9 X894.8 X895.0 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X894.9 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X894.8 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.0 X 5.7 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.5 1 X896.9 X897.1 III-896.0 III - � PER W JI 0 I 1EASEMENT DOC. NO. X895 3 325474 Y896.3 X895 5 X895 8 X896 X896 2 X896 3 X896 1 X895 9 X89 9 8959 X895 7 X895 5 X895 4 X895 5 X895 4 X895 3 X895 3 X895 4 X895 3 X895 4 X895 5 X895 3 X895 2 X895 0 X895I X895 2 X895 2 X895 0 X895 X895 0 X895 3 X895 2 X895 I X895 0 X894 8 X895 0 X895 2 X895 2 X895I X895 4 X895 5 X89 8 X896 2 X896 3 X896 2 X896 X896 2 X896 4 J = 6 896 5 8 5 X 896.8 X 896.8 X 896.9 X 897,81 �I �61 I II X895.2 X895.5 X895.6 X895. X895.9 896.1 X896.2 X896.1 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.1 X894.9 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.9 X896.1 X896 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 896.1 4 $g6 896 N I X895.3 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.0 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X8 6.I 6.0 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X 5.9 I I � I I181 CL 00 5. 1 1 1 z 1 5. Ili W N X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X-895.5 '>(895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.4 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.5 896.0 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 8960' X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 61_0. I LO z o I O ": X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 Xx$ V SA_. X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X 5.9 896.0 X896.1 X896\1 895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.8 �86, C I � -mil � I s . \ ti O O J \ P 5. �43 X895.3 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 XX8s5 895.5 895.6 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.7 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.4 X.6 X895.8 X895.9 X895.9 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 @86 1 o, s Q I I NO BUILDINGS OBSERVED `\ Z c� 39�, III O X895.1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.8 X895.8 896.0 X895.8 X895.4 X895.2 X\895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 89 X895.8 X 9519 \ I' W \ w " I Z �5.6 I Z X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.8 X895.6 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X�95.3 X895.4 X895.4 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.1 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X8 .0 X8 .1 X895.9 X895.4 X894.9 • X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.7 X8 5.8 X8'I _Ias4.7 1 _I 896 - < U) 8/ 897.4 �o I I X895.0 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.4 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 X895.4 X-895.'f (895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.2 X895.4 ( v I X895.4 ��9_,S�EL X894.8 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.5 X895.8 X896.0 X896.2 X896.1 X895.9 X895.1/ X894.6 X894.5 X894.4 X894.8 X895.0 X895.2 X895.4 X895.5 X895.3 X895.3 K?{ - X89 .5 i / � d30"_CMP a%6 9 I2 ( 894.9 NV=892.44i X895.0 895.1 895.0 X894.9 894.8 894.9 895.1 895.3 895.3 895.3 895.2 5.1 895.0 895.1 895.0 594.7 894.6 894.5 894.3 894.4 894.4 X894.6 X894.8 895.0 895.1 895.1 894.6 894. 894.3 894.7 895.0 895.E 895.9 896.0 8 896.2 895.9 1 8 5.6 X895.1 894.5 943 893.9 894.3 894.4 �894.7 - 895.1 _ X X X X X X X X X� X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DII� X X I \ �895.5 _ 895.7 _ - - - - ----- --- _ g s _ ss.'s 1 o I 894.6 �894.3 ---= r895.0 =--- ---- ---\ -- --- 892.2� ----- ---- - ---- - -894.6 900.9 I - 894.7 - - - _ - - - - - - -_-_ `895.1 1 U1 1 24°_RCP 894.1� DITCH 894.2 - - - 93.8 - - - - r - - --_8s2.5 -89L4 - - - - - - - -�958 - - �894.6 893.9 I III i IN892.60 X894.8 X894.8 X894.7 X894.6 X894.8 X895.1 X895.1 X895.2 X895.21 x8 5.1 �894.6 X894.8 9 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 895.4 X 5.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X885.6 I X895.6 X895.5 X895.1 X894.8 X894.4 X894.4 X894.4 X894.8 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.3 L 8 9 4.7 _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I `` I II ii 894.9 - 894.5- - 894.4- - --8 - - - - - - - - - 894.9 �894.4 L-894.3 L894.6 894.6 1 I )3. 43 895.6J �894.9 L894.8 894.6 894.5 OVER DITCH I� R``4"_f-R-895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X894.8 X895.1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X894.6 X894.6 X894.8 X894.6 X894.4 X894.4 X894.4 X894.5 X894.8 X895.0 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895X895.7 X895.6 X895.5 X895.2 X895.1 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.5 95.9 X89. X896. X896.4 6. U I 1895.3INV=892.51 �I \ NI CV)X 9 °895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 `, <895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.1 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.5 X895.6 X895.5 X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.4 X895.6 X895.8 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.6 896.0 X896.3 X896.4 XBoa z \l aoa s 96. ~ 95.9 < m I I asz8 NO BUILD S OI R \ I 0 8 .1 II 891. X89 7 Xass.a Xass.7 X897.1 X897s 894.9 892.0 X895.0 I X895.6 X896.2 X896.8 Xas7.1 001 rn rn alyol 00 N 8.71 I X 896.3 _--_><�86.0 X896.2 X896.9 896.2 X896.7 X896.7 X896.7 Xsss. X896.2 X896.6 X896.9 X896.9 X89 5.7 191.9 X 896.4 X896.6 X897.2 X896.8 X8 I� I X896.2 X896.6 X897.0 X897.0 X I X896.2 „ X896.6 X897.0 30 CMP X897.0 ; INV=891- _ jr MP X896.3 X 896.7 X897.0 X896.9 X 896.4 X 896.7 X896.8 g I I N X895.2 X895. X896.2 8 I I X 896.3 1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 \V/� 95.Y X895.6 X895.6 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.8 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895. X895.8 X895.6 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X89 7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X89. X896.1 X896.3 X896.2 896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.3 X896.4 X896.4 X896.3 X896.6 I gg 894.9 X895.4 X895.6 1 O 3 p I %F •` I 89.9 X 895.7 M Y� .5 \ ` , 896.9 I I Q I93.0 90�� q I 1 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 ��95X I .7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.9 I�8?5.6 X895.8 95.9 X895.8 X895.6 X895.7 X8 5.9 X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.6 Q I 96.6 I X894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 II I III - 896 X895.1 X895.5 X895.7 X895.8895.9 X895.9 896.0 896.1 X896.4 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.3 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.4 X896.5 X896.3 X896.1 896.0 X895.9 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896. X895.9 I X895.9 X89 9 X896.2 X896.2 X89 2 X895.9 X895.9 X895. X896.3 X896.5 X896.7 X896.8 X896.9 X896.9 X896.8 X896.8 X896.8 X896.8 X896.5 ? I 96.5 900.4 I \� I r\ I J 3892. I 1394.5 r \ 1 \ $�2.8 92.;1�895.3 I I S. X896.1 X896.2 II X896. _ X895.0 X895.4 X895.9, X896.0 896.1 X896.3 X896.3 X896.3 X896.6 X896.9 X897.1 X896.9 X896.7 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.3 X896.1 X895.9 X895.9 X895.9 X89 .0 X896.2 X896.4 X896.4 X896.4<' X896.3 X89 0 X896.0 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.8 X896.9 X897.0 X897.1 X897.1 X897.1 X897.0 X897.0 X897.0 X896.8 >1896.6 1 11 00 9 0.6 4 89f I l \ \ c\�� \i X 895 X 896.3 X896.3 X 89( I I X895.4 X1195.7 c 896.2 X1196.6 X896.7 X896.7 X1196.8 X897.2 X897.1 X1197.1 X897.2 X897.2 X897.1 X897,0 X1197.0 X1196.9 X896.8 X1196.7 X896.4 X8 .I X 896.0 X X896. 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X89 0 X895.9 X89 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.3 X896.4 X896.7 X897.0 X897.1 X897.2 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.2 X896.8 I 895.9 _ 895.8 .X896.1 X8963 X8S I I � 896 V II X895.7 896.1 X897.1 898.0 X898.2 .SgSX898.3 /\898. X897.5 X897.1 X897.1 X897.3 X897.5 X897.5 X897.3 X897.1 X896.9 X896.5 X .I 896f X X896.0 X895.9 X895. X896.0 896.0 X896.2 896.0 0 896.1 89 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.6 X896.9 X897.2 X897.3 X897.4 X897.4 X897.6 X897.8 X897.7 X897.5 X896.9 1 V I 95.0 N8 'n611 4 25D<I4 898.1 X899.1 X899.1 X898.7 X898.9 X89 .4 X897.3 X896.9N X896.8 X897.1 X897.4 X897.4 X897.2 X897.0 X896.6 X896.2 896.0 X896.0 X895.9 X895.9 896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X 96.1 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.1 X896.1 X896.3 X896.8 X897.2 X897.4 X897.8 898.0 X 98.0 X897.8 9 .9 897.9 X897.1 LQ N 33L 9 s 8sa.7 250 i 897.7 ---- - --------� X898.5 X897.7 X896.9 X866.8� X896.8 X897.0 X897.2 X897.1 X896.8 X896.5 X8 .2 X 6.0 X89. X896.0 X895.9 X 6.0 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 X896.0 X896.1 896.0 X895.8 X895.7 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X 95.9 X896.1 X896.3 X896.9 X897.4 X897.8 X898.1 X898.3 898.0 X8 .0 X898.1 898.0 X897 1.8 _ 898.s 1 s 8.6 8 897.6 ty- 9 I. 99.7 1 h O 99 8.0 97. I� 896 896 / 00. I 90 .9 GARAG I P 898.5 98.1 97.2 � � I O X 1 ) ,,,,I, O N X896.7 X8W.7 X896.8 X897.0 X896.9 X896.9 X896.7 X896.4 896.0 XS .8 X896.1 896.0 X895.8 X895.9 X895.9 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 X895.8 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.7 XS .0 X896.5 X897.0 X897.4 97.9 X898.2 X898.3 X898.3 X898.2 898.0 X897.8 X 7. Q6 i�9A U 00.9�--1-- 8. 897.0 �I O I O CE cgu RIM=_902._32 I N s� �I Xso0.7� Xas9.a � En 9 I. O1901.3 ---I -� -DECK N lL Mw O c 93.1 900.7 .J i (Vw Z INV 5=897.62 902. 90 O w N X896.8 X8�50 X896.4 X.8W.4 X896.6 X896.6 X896.5 X8 X895.7 X895.5 �jP.9 XU5,Y X89' .5 X89 .2 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X895.2 X895.6 X895.4 X894.9 X895.0 X895.0 895.1 895.1 895.1 35.1 L/ 895.3 T 9'5".� / 89 T 97.1 15° PVC SAN UB W - EM 989 3.4 900.X gg, 901.1 900.6 9 0.1 w J U Z M 03 / H S96 _ - - - -_-r 7_-F - - 91 9 3.4 901.0 Y � L3 EM -RETAIN II�OaNhPX gb X X X Xa x X897.6 898.0 X898.3 X898.5 N 80X4i 897.IXa 9T.7 1 GM o X 0 00 � � Zd C.L. FENCE 0.3' N NW l 4 OF SE 7, T. 3/, R. 22 - - � _ s2.1 _ ❑ w w v Z w ao 1,, 11, P � �' a j OF PROP. LINE s 4.g C.L. FENCE 0.4' S C.L. FENCE 0.3' N _C.L. FENCE ON �sss_z / - - _ _ - s RETAINING_ @❑ SEPTIC pZ 898. Zd w� -- N- X o0.5 as z o J a d a J �e9s.o C.L. FENCE 1.5' S 894.c - - -0 LINE - _ -OF-PROP, LINE �__ _ - = P&02 DITCH - 894 9 895.6 2.� G �ou 0 aX896.7 X8 � X�es.l X896.3 CX09FENCE 0.3' S 89�.4 95.4- _ __ U 0. - _ .- -894,--i�PR-OP - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - 0 89Y 3- gg66 _894 1.9 O U d J uJ O L - . SINE ---. - - - - �- s.l 2 O _ O) CONC. �A^TIO 12 8 6gg�.0- ->� -1-T - - - - 89 --`IQ'9Dt�- - 900 y6 S=8EiZ •5 .7 902. I. d Xsl2. /-8.9' N Of'0 fx 6xE GARDEN 00- 89 � �X -� 97.9 898 - - - - - - - rr - �E g 9 �go3. PROPXLINE \ a .2 _ - - r - N o- - N N\ 900 0 2.0 902.9 s" Pv - -- 9 29 .2 1 901.7 `-901.4 x 4.9 >16.14 �895.1 6.26`� Q� 99. _ _ - -- I� I� l� I� O rh O 94.8 95.7 903.1 D S 12�DI S 90 898.. - - 90o Z - a 5. z 1,i8°06'3 25 0.67 s 4 \ • p0 - -- -( - L2 - a __12 "_FES ` _ N J \ I \ L894.8 INV E-880.48 D CE I 902.2 903.1 L6 w 901.0 a 7902.1 J WV=884. 24� I JI J _ I N Q 894.8 \ RIM=90313 - IT SURD _ /-- _ N � z w d � NV=898.10 n I _ I� � I J I J - \ \ INV W=880.58 O d ( N RIM-903.03 z I- J 0 .4 L------- .psol.a d g o. X s.l - \ n.0 J N - \ EDGE OF WATER RI_M=902.74J = 901.9 <h V 3 . TNH=904.09 - INV=880.22 NV=898.53 a __ELEVATION=894.8 2" RCP s 2 s 2 p n J J J u I AS OF 10-12-21 BUILDING � J va J CL J - I / NIV=880.37 -CORNER 1.6' S w I I I I I 901.7- 19 w�` RIM=900 92 1III X896.1 X896.3 X896.2 XI X896.6 X896.7 X896.5 892.4 k 896.6 X897.0 X896.7 X896.5 SW COR. OF THE NW X/a�4.3 OF THE NE 114 OF 93.4 SEO 7, XT896,3/, R.X2S�s.8 X896.2 X896.2 X89 5" PVC SAN STU INV=880.49 891.8 X895.7 X895.7 Xe r.o X895.7 X895.5 X OF PROP. LINE o _ _ NV N=897.52 \ m 60 NV E-897.36 CARDINAL WAY ROBINSON DR (PUBLIC) / 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED n r r -I- l i\ n (PUBLIC) \ n -I r r- n r n n i\ r -I- I� -I- I /\ I I I I I I I \ 12 10 2021: PARCEL B ADDED Y F-- /-\ I F-< I �� F% i ��I �-\ l PROPERTY R•P DESCRIPTION I Parcel A 1. The basis of bearings based on Anoka County Coordinate System NAD (96 Adj.) O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 0 WELL G GAS The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. • FOUND IRON MONUMENT EM ELECTRIC METER D SANITARY SEWER 2. All distances are in feet. AND A SET NAIL 44110 GM GAS METER >> STORM SEWER 3. The property has vehicular access to Main Street via gravel drives. Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. EM ELECTRIC METER I WATERMAIN The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, EXCEPT the south 250 of © COMMUNICATION BOX FH1 HAND HOLE `0 FIBER OPTIC the west 250 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. 4. The locations of existing public utilities on or serving the property are depicted based on Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 212651615, 212651616, 212651617 & 212651618, available city maps, records and observed evidence OS SANITARY MANHOLE ❑F FIBER OPTIC BOX ou OVERHEAD UTILITY AND locations. Lacking excavation, underground utility locations may not be exact. Verify critical utilities prior to construction ❑ CATCH BASIN O SANITARY CLEAN OUT E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. or design. -& POWER POLE ) SIGN -X-X- FENCE AND 5. Benchmark: Anoka County benchmark no. 2009, located in the NE 1/4 of Sec. 7, T. 31, R. 22, on the SW corner of C-- GUY WIRE EM ELECTRIC METER GRAVEL Main Street (C.S.A.H. No. 14) and Fourth Ave located on the NE corner of the fiberglass pad for the electric box and GUY POLE a CULVERT - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. has an elevation of 902.805 ft (NAVD 88). LIGHT POLE MAILBOX EDGE OF TREES Abstract Property 6. The area of the above described property is: X WATER VALVE ® BOLLARD :; '•• ; CONCRETE 6,903,837 square feet or 158.490 acres -6- FIRE HYDRANT - - TOP OF DITCH Parcel B Area minue R/W: 6,627,639 square feet or 152.150 acres The south 250 of the west 250 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. 1 NY 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET Q N N SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS LEGEND O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 • FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET NAIL 44110 Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. © COMMUNICATION BOX �S SANITARY MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN POWER POLE GUY WIRE GUY POLE LIGHT POLE X WATER VALVE � FIRE HYDRANT WELL EM ELECTRIC METER GM GAS METER EM ELECTRIC METER 0 HAND HOLE 0 FIBER OPTIC BOX O SANITARY CLEAN OUT ) SIGN FE -ml ELECTRIC METER a CULVERT F�-1 MAILBOX ® BOLLARD GAS D SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER WATERMAIN F0 FIBER OPTIC ou OVERHEAD UTILITY E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -X-X- FENCE GRAVEL - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH EDGE OF TREES CONCRETE - TOP OF DITCH o� ou ou R. SEC 7, � 0u Ou 31, R. 22' - - - - - 10'59"W 1307.90 - BIT SURFACE 902 �14 • - .9 " 148" RCP ,...., - - - -�NO 07-- ou - -� NE COR. OF THE NW -___ 18" CMP �11 14 OF THE N 114 OF_ - vv=S9s.is 902.5 - - - - - o o SEC 7, T. Lj- 0OA• 902.s Ls - I " CMP - 00 �-O FACE o 902.3 902.47 INV=897. 902. so2a- 902.5 t5lCESS902'2rs02.31 CCESS902 yo18"-CMp--- 020 -� INV=896.04 S V .4_ T ry r�-__._ ��___._ - T•a -ice.... 897.1 X896.4n .W03.1 X I5MP 904� PL 4 E FO 96.6 Xa96.7 896.7 SIGN- E 00.1 INV=89 .98 \I0' GRAVEL SURFACE 901.5 1 16.9 F § I 1. \ a ass.7 ass I 894-� soo.o o / ;�so2. 01.7 15.8 91 7 1 894 _ 896 p�0� 2s X899.1 X9oo. 2'� 902_ •X49 .7-X 1 I as s $ - - - 7 C- I� HF l�4 0 X 7'X soa4s so3.7 s .3 2.0rg 01. MP 0II MP I 2 �• ,\ =-- 899.2 901.0 90 .6905.E X9 I. X899.0 897' AS TRAVELED) NE l/4 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 Ssss CO C. STORA E BINS i I 1 �9.=89h 97.3. Xa97.3 X X 897.3 F EL 19 903.7 1 899.1 w z ry O i I V=89 7 ``S� CMP_ 897.2 XS 8.2 X X896.9 I I 27 6� 96.3 8 _ C P/ 1 X896.5 X897.6 X898.3 STO AGE- 01 8 OFFIC 903.1� X 900. V - R0 .3 X_ INV=893.09 I I X Z o O INV= 92. 3 89 1 00 899.4 900.9J _ - RE PROPA E s'7+ so$.o 0 ANK 90 9 ridO.3 899 00 901.� m I TA K O903.7 0 .4 Cam X I. 596.9 _ X 9 2.5 _ 57.0 X896.9 96.4 896.5 X897.0 898.0 I GRAV L SURFACE 899.2 X903.0 X899.5 X 896.9 X 897.1 X 897.7 1 X 98.1 X896.4 X897.1 X897.6 Xa98.1�a9s.2 9I)_0. 904.0 05.2 X X9oo. q � 905.2 SILO I I W I qp �X 9.Q0.9 302` 902.9 � SE P IC1:3902.5 33. X90 X 0J Z U I 896.5 896.8 X896.9 X 9-�900.8 902.3� 2.9 96.2 X896.4 J �- 8 56 X896.8 X X897.8 X897.0 Z 898.0 898.1 902. w Z 902.3 00 X899.2 99.8 X89 1 896.9 1 8 .1 898.0 X896.5 X897.3 X X X898.2 99.6 X900.9 X -gym O X9o1.s 900 1� I soo.sJ d m X 89: 899.4 9.0 8.8 891. I 900.0 X900.6 902.8 s5s 896.1 � I Xs9 7 Xsss.a Xass.? Xas7.l X897.6 Xsoo.3 so. Xass.s Xa s � I \ 894.9 X897.2 X897.0 899.4 I I 900.2 900.9 X900.8 X900.8 592.0 X896.8 X897.9 X 97.9 X898.8 > X X900.4 X90 .4 ass. 899.7 X898.5 I I 1 1 t ^ 96.5 1 N I Xass.a Xasz1 aszo I Xsoo.s Xso1.o p I � / X900.2 899 898. � '�95.7 X 5.9 X895.0 X895.6 Xa96.2 X901.1 899.E X 90 .4 RR!I�� X 896.7 897.0 X 898.2 7I 899.8 900.0 I' / ` 9 '2 Z D X Xss8.3 Xasa.s X898.s X X soo.s 0 1) 00 00 X901.2 I Q > 892.1 195.76I0• 89�895.7 X896.3 6.0 X896.2 X901.3 < < O Xass.s Xas7.o Xsoo.a X9oo.2 ass.1 I o o w 8.71 1 Xs96.9 1 Xspo.s Xs .2 1 - L w Z N I X897.4 X898.3 X898.6 X898.4 X89 .9 r N � H X898.3 `�8*299.7 X900.3 1 N � V) 395.8 61� 891 I I X901.3� _L X40 7 899. 1 IW X 896.2 XE96.7 X896.7 X896.7 I I X901.1 Z X900.3 = cv IIooXas6.9 X897.0 Xa97.6 Xaszs 900.0 X900.1 OZ � X898.4 X .0 Xa97.eo XasB.l o Xa s X900.3 a o 395.8 @6 X896.6 X896.9 \>(901.7Xso1.7 X896..X896.9 X897.3 ,A X899.7 XSss.s I� Ssss 5.7 X 897.6 X897.5 1 < \ X 900.5 X1$99.80- 1 Z 891.9 X 898.0 3ss.a X sss as ' Xas7s XSszs X898.3 9T X90o.a Xsmo.z Xsoo.s X900.8 � iE899 9s.s X896.4 Xass.s X8s7.2 XSss.B I I - X9 .2 \ 6 X897.0 X897.2 X897.2 X899.1 X897.4 I Xass.o X9 ass. 1 i sss.l 395.7 X8 5.8 X8 6. X897.4 X898.0 97.9 X89 I X9*j-(*30,7 <� Z I ( X,9o1.2 X900.5 X899.6 I X896.2 X896.6 X897.0 X897.0 I �_) X899.6 X899.3 X900.4 � � I 897.4- I 8959 X897.1 X897.0 X897.1 X897.0 I I X899.2 X 99. ass. 1 395.3 X89 .5 I I I 391.8 I I X897.0 X897.4 898.0 X 9�l1""s�(so1.1 Xass.a X900. o o I I I X900.8 X899.9 X900.3 O W d _ 30°_CMP I X896.2 �� X896.6 X897.0 < I X898.1 O ? 898. 898.7 NV=892441 I )0_ C_MPX897.0 X897.0 I O J 895.1 I 1 L ,, INV=891.81 X897.0 X896.8 �( w t X900.3 9 �99.7 X 896.6 I 0 X898.1 X900. X 8@W•c1i�II` P95.9 _ 3 MP X896.9 X897.4 X898.4\ _ 901.3 96.5 9 X900.7 X899.1 X900.8 \�00 X896.3 X896.7 X897.0 X896.9 X896.7 X896.7 3 \\ K i; i X897.7 897.9 X899.3 898.I DO 4 X 896.9 895.7 X896.3 X896.4 X896.9 1 1 X900.6 X899.4 89� 3 X898. X901.11f,901.6 X901.0 900.1 X900.2 1 I 1 II .7 X8 .2 X897.5 I 5'9 X896X896.4 X896.8 X896.9 � � I 898. 896. X896.4 I I X896.6 �I X896.8 X896.3 X896.T \ � � I 900.0 X899.0 N 1 97.7 Xsoo.s Xso2I 898.5 o � X sss.o . � 9j��1.8 X901.2 900.2 896.0 Xsss.z XSss. Xass.2 897.9 X897. 898.4 Cfl1 asa.s co X896 896.3 X896.5 C i X896.3 .6 X896.6 � I I X899.0 �I X896.7 X896.6'TwX896.9 X899.7 X898.5 $ 897.9 X898.2 902.1 X902.6 �g i X9 9ID2.0 X901.0 \ 899.9 897.9 X8 .5 a 896.3 X896.6894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X896.2 X899. 9 (V i � I i � I v y L L J gg 891Q XX897.6 LC)l 896.9 X896.5 X86.7 X897.2 Xa98.9 X897.2 < L L 1 J _ X 898.2 902.1 X902.61 X901.2 897.0 M 9` 2.3 X899.8 0 896.E - T - 896.4 X896.6 96.E I X898. XS 7.6 895.8 - 1 - X894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X896.1 I I X899.4 897.1 X 895.7 X896\6 X896.6 X897.3 I I X8 .2 X897.4 X897.0 I - - I \ , X896.7 897.9 902.2 96.1 �' I 1 � Xso2.2,`,ks�so .2 Xsol.s soo.o �- 896.5 .Z I; g96.5 I II VV j` I 98.1 X897.5 p895.3 I X897.8 X897.2 L 1�6U2.8 I 92.J`X896.1 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 902 I X897.1 X 9 0 6O 1 0 \ X996.4 X896.7 X896.7 X897.4 OA L 1 - 1 (p 897.8 X 900.8 co 1 I 1 � \, X901.6 �2'0 X902.0 900.1 X897.7 X8s7.1 X897.5 4.1 �89s 8 897.0 896.8 896.E / - I I Xass c I X897.3 X897.2 - 896, 7 894.8 \ X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 �896.3 1 X897.1 97. 7.�r - 894.7 I X896.4 X896.5 897.5 I O• 8 •8 897.6 897.2 X896.8 X896.8 X 897.9 X899.1 `I, �/ (���b 11 1 894.8 Xsoo.*9�($01•7 X901.6 soo.o 1 891.9 I 898.0 I X897.2 Xas7.4 X897.6 `o I 1 895.9 2.9 895.8 X896.3 X896.1 X896.4 X897.���c897. X 97 I I \ X 896.5 X 896.E I \ X 896.9 I X 897.0 X 897.6 X QQ�O. 897.5 X 896.3 0) 1 I 7.8 X898.7 X899.3 � � \ X 899.71 (9390.5 X9 .3 X897.3 > co 896.3 897.9 X897.2 X897.69 897.5 897.3 I 1 Q- 11 X896.1 X X896.2 X896.3 I I Q 894.3 W X 896.5 897.5 � ;897.9 X897.1 l i i X896.4 X896.7 X897.2 X897.7 X897.7 8.2 I I 4� X 97 1 8j- 1 1 X897.8 �Q 11 � � Q 8.2 X898. X 898.3 X897.7 X896.9 X897.2 X897.5 1 897.3 00 0) Q L 1 -1897.7 i 11 X896.6 X896.7 X896.5 I \ Xgq •3 X 1 1 I- 0) Z _- X896.3 X �I 1 O 8892.4 Xa96.5 X896.6 n .896.E X896.9 X897.6 X897.6 X897.4 1 .. %K8�1397.2 X897.8 X897.2 1� W X896.6 X 896.9 X897.5 X896.5 X896.8 X896.8 X 894.5 1 I o � W ;aszs X 9 I o I I X897.0 Xass.7 Xesss 1 1 X896.9 X896.8 ass.s as7.zX 1 1 /�� o Xass.a Xsss.s �p 11 X896.3 X896.7 897.E Q0 X897.1 X897.5 X 1 32 I N SW COR. OF THE NW S LINE OF THE NW l/4FsssTdlE X896.77.o Xs97•z Xas6.? Xass.3 I11 97.62 EM 1 891 I __ � OF THE NE 114 OF / NE 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 I XSs7.1 MATCH LINE PLS l2'��� I - ��,Aq77 �E 8.X/$"9�3 / I / 393.4/ g93.4 SEC 7, XT896.31/, R. 2g / `X'a9896.7 X8996.1 896.3 X896.3 X896.5 X897.5 I I 1 - - - / 92•I 1 X8 X896.5 X896.4 X896.8 897.3 896.5 -� X896.3 X896.5 X896.8 X896.9 X897.0 X896.5 III - I 1 894.2 _ a .6 ,I 1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.9 X897.2 X896.9 X896.4 X896.2 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896. X896.0 X89 .I X896.2 X896.3 X896.7 897. I 02.5 8948 902 I1 15" PVC SAN STU II I INV=880.49 11 1 I c9 891.8 X895.7 X895.7 X895.9 X895. X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.5 X896.3 896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.2 896.0 896.0 X896.1 X896.3 X896.7 X897.5 I1 I 903.1 895.5 103.03 i 1 i�RQF �QR )� 0 50 100 200 NSCALE IN FEET 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED 12-10-2021: PARCEL B ADDED E Q N Ln I N O N C v N 0 O 00 N / O / L 0 00 0 N N CD N 011 a� 0 0 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 GAS • FOUND IRON MONUMENT D SANITARY SEWER A SET NAIL 44110 >> STORM SEWER Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. WATERMAIN © COMMUNICATION BOX FO FIBER OPTIC �S SANITARY MANHOLE 0u OVERHEAD UTILITY ❑ CATCH BASIN E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -0- POWER POLE -X-X- FENCE GUY WIRE GRAVEL GUY POLE - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH LIGHT POLE EDGE OF TREES X WATER VALVE CONCRETE -6- FIRE HYDRANT - - TOP OF DITCH O WELL FE MI ELECTRIC METER GM GAS METER EM ELECTRIC METER 0 HAND HOLE 0 FIBER OPTIC BOX O SANITARY CLEAN OUT a-� 0 SIGN EM ELECTRIC METER a CULVERT 7-1 MAILBOX ® BOLLARD 896.6 894.5 I I 1 O � Z na9i.o x896.5 I X X I� O I I X896.7 X896.4 3.2 898.0- X897.8 X 7. I O I I X896.3 X896.7 X897.1 X897.5 X897.6 I X896.5 X896.9 X896.8 897.2 I a-Q O RIM=902.32 I N SW COR. OF THE NW S LINE OF THE NW //4 RW96TO/E Xe96.7� 70 XSs".2 Xass.7 Xas6.3 III � PL S /2��4I Nv s=897.62 EM I I _ $/ OF THE NE l/4 OF ' NE 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3I, R. 22 I I Xasz1 MATCH LINE - iINV W- %�7� `. �.. 89I g93.4 9�3 _ sz:4 / SEC 7, XT896,3I, R. 24 - Xass 3 - X .a X896.5 896.4 896.1 896.3 X896.3 X896.5 X897.5 I 1 X Xss6.a as7.3 I�"ao� a X896.5 X X 896.9 Xasss - 896.3 X896.5 896.8 X X897.0 894.2 02.5 �• 2.0 I X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.9 X897.2 X896.9 X896.4 X896.2 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896. X896.0 X89 .1 X896.2 X896.3 X896.7 897..894.8 9� �00 1 903. ' 9I 1 15" PVC SAN STU 0)02. II 1 II _ -- - INV=880.49 00 S 511PV S 12 DI 891.8 903.1 8955 X895.7 X895.7 X895.9 X895. X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.5 X896.3 896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.2 896.0 896.0 X896.1 X896.3 X896.7 X897.5 902.2 I 1.6 I 0.4 �LRIM=903.03 I, 896 12v RCP 53 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X C 999.6 6.0 895.7 895.5 895.6 895.8 896.1 896.2 8 6.1 895.9 895.9 895.9 896.0 896.1 896.4 896.5 896.5 896.3 896.1 896.1 896. 8 895.5 895.8 595.8 89 896.2 897. .3 \ RIM=902.65_; 895.2 .2 \ N V = 880.37 X v 1 896. X895.8 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 896.0 X896.3 X896.3 X8 6.1 X895.9 X895.9 6.0 X895. X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 96.0 8 .0 X895.9 895.7 X895.8 8 1.7 89 8 6 O ^ 896.5 .5 899.1 $Oj V � I 898.1 - 8 .8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896. X89 .0 �896.0 X896.0 X 95.9 .0 X896.1 X896.2 X896.4 X896.2 X895.9 ��895Y X895. X896.2 X896.3 X896.4 X896.7 X896.7 I I 894.9 / LO II L1_ - - 5) --� _00 _ U ` X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 896.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 96.0 96.0 896.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.4 X896.6 X896.4 Xs� 895.6 X895.8 X896.1 X896.3 X896.8 X897.2 X897.4 I 36"_CMP__ - / ��� 896.8 i INV=894.95 - - -_ --- a92.2 6 �- 894.4 -c V a96 s�Q<v�36" CMP / 897.4- �$95.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.8 X 96.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 X895.9 896.0 X896.4 X896.4 X896.6 X896." X896.6X895.-8 .9 X89 .0 896.1 X896.5 X897.1 Xa97.s X897 - I a/ - --- a ." LLLJ ' _ L--J III U) < -1\ / \ 1 X894.9 X894.7 X894.7 X895.0 X895.5 896.0 X896.3 X896.3 X896.2 X896.2 X896. X895.9 896.0 X896.4 X896.6 X896.7 X896.8 X896.6 895.7 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X897.1 X897.6 X895 I I -D <^ 895.0 1 N 897.5- I\ 4829.8 Q L -L _ - < -1\ a91.6-1�3 8894.5 X894.4 X894.6 X894.8 X895.2 X8 5.8 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X 96.1 X895.8 X895.8 896.0 X896.5 X896.5 X896.7 X896.9 P • <896 X895. X896.1 896.0 X896.1 X896.4 X897.1 X897.4 X897. I I W 897.1 as I� NO BUILDI GS OBSERVED �I N >-DLLJ L Q= / L - i I� I\' 895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.5 X896.1 X896.4 X896.4 X89. X895.8 X895.7 896.0 X896.4 X896.6 X896<1 X896.6 896.0 X895.5 X895.8 X895.8 96.0 X896.4 X897.0 X897.2 X897. I � _ 1�� L -L- / �' W / \ CJ O I O�� / \ I ti 0 L I10NN �(n W / LAX 895.4 X895.6 X 5.9 X86.2 X 896.4 X 896.4 X896.2 895.9 896.0 X896.5 X86. \ x896.6 X89 .X 895.7 X 895.4 X895.8 896.0 X896.2 X 896.6 X897.0 O", 2- L 896.6 1 J - T -c J LAX 895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.7 X89 .9 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X 96.1 896.0 X/896.4 IX896.5 X896.3 X 96.1 895.9 X895.4 X89 .9 X896.1 X896.3 X896." X897.1 X896.9 ~ 897. 0 Z I� Z < C' 0- Q O L 1 J -- W d X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896 X895.8 X89 . 895.8 /X895.6 -X89 . X896.2 X896.3 X896.2 895.9 X895.3 X895.8 X895. X896.3 X896.8 X897.1 X897.2 J \ c �'� 9.8 L 1 - - ` L L 596.4 < 898.2 Z I I -7- 895 392.1 i \-/ / - 34.8 ( \ 891.9 -900.0 98.6C0-893.7 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.9 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895 9 X896.2 5�896.3 X896. X895.7 X895.1 X895.6 X 6.0 X896.6 X897.2 X897.6 898.1 X ' 7 d' 893.4,1N + 898.2 � 2k HIGH RIM-897ocs .22� (pI I X895.8 X895.8 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.7 X895.4 r\X8P5.5 X895.4 95.8 X896.4 X 6.7 X896.6 X896.4 X895.8 X895.1 X89. X896.2 X896.9 X897 X898.5 X8989// / \ LOW RIM-896.11 , INV-895.12 \ 00 I r 91.4 96 < / (J 500`- - �� gg p I 95.6 I5 FSS \ \ �D� 901.7 M OUTLET 7i j<a��.�s- ��s.o _Xass.7_ Xass.s-Xass.s Xass.s- �ass_s ass.s -X8sMs, ss� e9s7 - s� (ass. Xss�+ Xes7.� Xa9�a- s s9s. assT-Xass.a �ass.s �a �.7 Xasa.s / ,4� O CONTROL 01 ,- r STRUCTL 7 ' ?� /--� OF POWER INE INPLA E CO 0 7 OU L1J 91 UOU OU OU OU OU OU OU - OU 0 U - OUPOU - 0 U OU OU - OU - .900.9 - - - 8 `.L �99�s �.. 1/ao��®F__Lo�F_�_�oa°,�,,F�--�,,T�tY�BQ5.�- � 0 9 897.5 6.3 X 895. U X 896. 89 - - u ou ou ou • ou oU 0u 0U ou 0 u ou o u 9 �,f) < _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_- -_-_- -_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - I ! - - Xa 892 89621� 3-'y\`89 .-X-n5.8- �895:5-XS95� -X99- .4 �8�5.4v naa5.4 -X895.4 X 5.9 X896.5 X 96.2 6.6-- 89�:2- 97.5 X898.0 X897.8 X8 6.5 95.7 X896.1 X896.3 X896.6 X897.1 -I X89 I 97.9 -_ .3 i .� _ _ - - - - - - I L 1 J �b8.8 8. 898.3 T Lf)I I 11 X895. 895.9 X895.8 X895.5 X895.5 'X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X8 .8 X896.4 89 X 897.0 X897.3 X897.7 X897.8 X8 6.6 895.8 X896.0 896.0 X896.3 X896.6 8 18 I -- li -<� - `\ CL OF 90 FT EASEMENT ---------- I --- Xo s s".a / - - �- ` PER DOC. NO_325474 - - - I I X .5 0000 X895.7 X895.9 X895.8 X895. X895.6 896.0 X896.2 X896.4 X896.5-X_$968- -X896. 895.6 X895.5 6.0 X896.4 X896.8 X897.0 896.2 X895.7 X895.8 XS 5.9 X896.4 X896.5 X 6. I g .3 On �� 1 891. 892.4 - - -I -� - CD I L 1 L -L _ / - \ r\ I11 I 90 .6 / < - L - J I X895.5 X8s .9 X895.9 X895.6 Xass. X896.2 X896.5 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 896.5 X895.5 X895.1 X895.4 Xa95.6 X895.8 Xass. 895." X895.6 X895.9 X896.1 X896.5 X896.4 I .7 9a 0 897.2 \ - / X 975 ----I I \ 96.7 L 1 - i \ / \ II X895.7 X866.2_ X896.2 X895.9 X89 9 X896.3 Xa96.8 X897.1 X896.8 8 .0 X895.7 Xa95.2 X895.1 X895.5 X895.8 Xa95.8 X895.7 X895.4 X 95.7 X896.1 X896.2 X896.3 X8 .I I I 3: �+ 897.0 9• Ld I8 III IQ r - - T - 1 00 X896.6 X897.0 X896.9 X896.7 X896.4 X896.5 X896.6 X897.1 X897.1 X89 .4 X895.5 X895.1 X895.1 X895.6 896.0 X89 X895.9 X895.3 X89 6 X896.3 X896.2 X 6.1 X895.9 O m Q - - 891L -L. 1 I I '4 897.3 N O - - X897.2 X897.3 X897.1 X897.0 X897.3 X897.4 X897.2 X897.3 �897.2 X896.8 6.1 X895.2 X895.0 X895.4 X895. X896.3 X896.4 X895.5 895.9 X896.6 X896.4 896.0 X895 1 896.9 0 L 1 J 98.0 L 1_ L- J I I B�J� / < I 898 I 9&2 cl- Q o \ / X897.0 X896.8 X896.5 X896.7 X 97.7 X898.4 X898.3 X 97.8 X897.2 X896.9 X896.5 X895.2 X894.9 X895.2 X895.5 X896.4 X897.0 89 .9 896.5 X897.3 X896.9 X896.5 X896.3 1 I 898.3 9.0 --> 81. 8�1 72" CM_P I I 9 - - INV=889.74, I p L 1 J ` I 896 5Nv=888.84 �9 I 89 5 900.3 8 .5 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X896.4 X 97.7 X898.4 X898 X897.6 X897.1 X896.9 X896.5 X895.2 X895.0 X895.4 X895. X896.5 X8�7.3 X89 897. X �" D�X897.4 X896.8--=}>;�s�o � �I. I 12" CM - 12" MP / __18° CMP S LINE OF THE SW l/ OF THE 1.0=891.37, INV- 90.50 _ N��89 . a ,-1-------- _ / 894.4 INV=898.17, - 897.2 ,0 11.8 RIM=_900.92 896 / NE l 4 OF SEA'. _7 - - - - - - _ � � I � �g INV=896.15 - 891.3 ,INV S-896.0 8" RCP____ _ 896. 897.1 " 892 893.2 R1M=_9_0_2.12 \ - =896= _ - - - 94 E E INV=887.59 i soo.5 896 - - 95.9 a• v 98.2 P CMP 898.4 902a _ _ - 2 so s Xas7a w CONNEXUS _ X �V LFC) ��X896. SERF 8'oOMP (PER MAPS) S9s.s I- S S 9 .6 4 _ i �897.4 89 .8 898.1 �898.4 g _ 97' 97.5 8\� 898.3 BIT RFACE INV=900.01 �898.7 �898.8 affi.6 •3 1 896.8 \ 6 12"I DIP 8. 900.1 CARL STRE (PUBLIC) 97.6��6a \ 2.2 \ L902.3 9o1.890L.4� 901.3� / 7�.5 E'RL STREET- \TNH=904_91 - n r n rn 901.9 R=_-(AS TRAVELED) 2'2 I I r 900_82�'2.2 � RIM=901.89 F < F < \ I H < NV N=895.90 _I_8_ RCP,' CONNEXUS INV=888.88 INV S=895.75 15" RCP NV=894.64 (PER MAPS) 0 50 100 200 NSCALE IN FEET 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED 12-10-2021: PARCEL B ADDED E Q IP Ln I N O N O C� N O 0 O O 00 O N / O 0 a� O 00 0 N N O N 011 0 L 0 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS _a r --- - -mac•_. '`- -- -- - --- _� "'"°"\ a Lm ,-T ki , -1a J� AN, Ap.JIP SITE DATA 1 �/1 AREAS: 157.054 acres (Per ALTA Survey) + 1.4356 acres ryio:ms,zzzz000zl LEG EN D TOTAL GROSS AREA OF CONCEPT: 158.490 acres DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY — '� r I • 1 ,� WETLANDS: DITCHES - PUBLIC & PRIVATE PER SURVEY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY N. 1 CONCEPT PLAN DETAILS: PROPOSED LOT uNES •+.7�� - �!- 4 • LOCAL PUBLIC ROAD TYPICAL SECTION = 60' ROW, 30' B-B PROPOSED SETBACK _ PARKWAY TYPICAL SECTION = 1 00'ROW, 20' BB w/ 20 MEDIAN". EAST -WEST COLLECTOR - 66' ROW, 36' BB PUBLIC ROADWAY 1 _ 1,.�,.+•- - - - - - PRIVATE DRIVE ROADS = 24' BB TOP BACK CURB/ROAD EDGE/STRIPING . :+'C" _,• r RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ASSUMPTIONS i-t {�' - ' i a •• 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK PRIVATE ROADWAY •• 5/10 OR 7.5/7.5' SIDE YARD SETBACK TOP BACK OF CURB •• 25SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ROWy- ' L•. - + r - •• 50' SETBACK TO COUNTY ROADS (SINGLE FAMILY) SETBACK 8' PUBLIC TRAIL+ _ WETLAND ONSITE ASSUMED AS HIGHEST CLASSIFICATION • TOWNHOME /ROWHOME DETAILS s' PUBLIC SIDEWALK. �. •• 22. MIN. DRIVEWAY •• 20, MIPROPOSED POND AREAN. BUILDING SEPARTION •• 24' BB PRIVATE DRIVES 65' WIDE LOTS °• s' i. LOT SUMMARY 55LOTS: WIDE - -� 65' WIDE LOTS = 98 50' WIDE LOTS !t ' 55' WIDE LOTS = 82 y •' •. ��' y j r ' 50' WIDE LOTS = 83 BACK -BACK ROWHOMES �. t ^' .-. 1�T" ROWHOMES (BACK TO BACK AND ROW) = 64 ROW TOWNHOMES = 100� Z. �,' ROW TOWNHOMES ► t• MULTI FAMILY HOUSING = 280 - TOTAL HOUSING UNITS = 710 UNITS MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING (CONTINENTAL)Ai ROBINSON PROPERTY - CONCEPT PLAN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA x ;': Ap". _ • 1 e, QO=U��U w ' ® z • 0 75 150 300 e9 SCALE IN FEET N REVISION DATE: 12-13-2021 (>iaMnv 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 MAIN A L L I A N T 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com uq - - -- �~ EXISTING DITCHF-T — 8 7 6 5 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 4 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 42 3 nI — c 2 51 _ _ — — — -- +^ 78 79 80 81 _ 82 — — 59 60 61 fit 63 64 65 66 67 75 76 77 Dc 50 43 44 45 46 47 48 51 1 v I 49 50 fib 74 I 58 49 I 52 r 69 57 73LLJ 1 48 53 + 56 70 72 �n + 52 47 53 54 54 55 71 55 96 97 98 2 95 46 LAKE 3 8.0 ACRES POND t 45 56 POND 2.7 ACRES 94 4 + 59 58 57 .3 ACRE 44 + 93 5 92 43 81 91 I 80 82 6 I 42 fig 70 ' 7 — � _ 60 68 71 79 83 90 / I fit 8 67 72 78 84 89 fit 87 9 s 41 ` 38 37 63 74 75 76 77 85 8fi 88 ,� fi4 65 fib 73 36 10 40 39 — _ -- — ❑� C 35 11 v I 34 13 12 + �n 33 11 18 17 16 15 14 + o j I 32 3111 30 29 28 f 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 POND 11 + + 11 � 0.5 ACR . C CARDINAL WAY ROBINSON DR (PUBLIC) — - (PUBLIC) ........ - - - - - - - - - - AM - - - ' - ram- • . r 'S z �.;i '7 ''f t U - � � �. � � � v � . ova � • ��e�r..=.,�<:�r.: ir.�t�r - _: ©w cc I a 00 0 I 0 I 4 cLuSHOUse — 1 g� 1 im: m f r----1- _r cn �w zcr oQ a- c� t Map I Bills � Qr 46 + — ' 47 1 CLUB 48 2 ' 49 3 CC 50 4 51 Cb 5 82 ' 52 45 6 81 ' 53 44 7 I 80 54 43 1 55 8 79 8 56 42 9 + 78 1 41 �1 9 57 10 77 / 40 11 76 POND 58 39 �+ 5.3 ACRES / 59 38 Q� � 12 I 75 60Crs 37 13 74 AT y Aw 14 73 6116 71 + 15 1 72 62 35 co 17 I 70 / 66 65 64 fi3 fib fi7 / 34 . !` `s� .ter •4 33 Al' 19 32 i 2fi 27 28 29 30 31 w _ off 0 �' 20 21 22 / 23 24 25 It Awl :fir '• .1. i - �,. of '+ `j * ` r r r 4 CARL STREET (PUBLIC) I 9n fe ru fe er6es,UC LINO LAKES,MN r S CARL STREET (PUBLIC) ALLIANT 12-3-Luz E 4 �� m■� iu::r' �,. a �--- l IAII�r u u�t•� 1 ', '',,,.,ram "'0� \ -Y � � i '�+ I 8 "� I-'� �_ •� I t "*5m��ti • y .r I. -a. '7 A: I �I *} o _ @d ii— Tlow, r 41 '�J _ ' ' fie` - .f� +� • �R�+L.+ I I i "o -,X 'I LEGEND ` �� rl► - - _ r I DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY r1 /1 r1 1 w I n /1 \ 1 r1 r1 /1 r1 r• r1 T\/ n I l r% r% o% l I \ I r% 1 01% It I LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA N REVISION DATE: 12-10-2021 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 MAIN A L L I A N T 612.758.3099 FAX EN GIN EERING www.alliant-inc.com wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: January 5, 2022 Re: Robinson Property Concept Plan WSB has reviewed the Robinson Property Concept Plan for a 710 unit PUD prepared by Integrate Properties, LLC and submitted on December 13, 2021. The site is located south of Main Street (CSAH 14), east of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53), and north of Robinson Drive and Carl Street. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was not provided and should be completed for this site. Engineering • Erosion Control & Grading The proposed Robinson Property project would require mass site grading, appurtenant erosion control, and a SWPPP. Stormwater Management The Robinson Property is drained by a series of private ditches and roadway ditches west of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) and south of Main Street (CSAH 14) that tie into Anoka County public ditch 10- 22-32 (ACD 10-22-32). ACD 10-22-32 flows south through the Robinson Property to Carl Street. ACD 10-22-32 continues south under Carl Street and ultimately discharges to Marshan Lake. Anoka County should review the preliminary drainage design and site access concurrent to the City's preliminary plat reviews. Most of the site is within the City's General Floodplain District (FEMA Zone A) and, according to the Geotechnical Evaluation Report cited in the Concept Plan Submittal, groundwater levels range from 4-feet to 9-feet in depth. The applicant will be required to meet all City of Lino Lakes ordinances and RCWD rules for surface water management. The Robinson Property is in the Marshan Resource Management Unit (RMU) according to the City of Lino Lakes 2018 Local Water Management Plan (WMP). The WMP noted several issues within the Marshan RMU, including the following issue pertinent to the Robinson Property: "ACD 10-22-32 is ineffective for future urban runoff volumes." (Appendix B). A strategy for mitigating this issue specific to the Robinson Property noted in the WMP was: "Proposed master community plan for sod fields" (Appendix B). In addition, the WMP identified existing and future flooding and pollutant loading concerns within the RMU, including Marshan Lake and adjacent wetlands and ACD 10-22-32 (Table 2-21). WMP Goal 4.1 is to "Provide adequate storage and conveyance of runoff to protect public safety and minimize property damage." To address the City's flooding concerns in accordance with this goal, implementing stormwater rate and volume control practices where feasible throughout the Robinson Property will be critical. Sufficient freeboard must be provided for proposed structures above the seasonal high groundwater levels and floodplain elevations in compliance with City Ordinance Chapter 1102 (Stormwater, Erosion and Sediment Control) and RCWD Rule C (Stormwater Management). Ditch conveyance capacity along Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) and Main Street (CSAH Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 2 14) should be maintained and street entrance ditch crossings should utilize large and/or multiple pipe or box culverts. City and RCWD regulatory floodplain management requirements will also need to be met (See Floodplain below). WMP Goal 7.2 is to "Ensure that well -planned, quality residential... development accommodates the City's projected growth needs and occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the City's natural resources and amenities." To assist the City in meeting this goal, the applicant should provide the following for the proposed stormwater ponds and lakes: 1) shoreline geometry that more closely resembles natural bodies of water, 2) buffers for natural vegetation and high-water level bounce, 3) areas for future maintenance activities (e.g., pond/lake dredge material removal and dewatering) and 4) differentiation of the water quality and quantity function, goal, and design of both. Water Supply The existing properties are identified as a Stage 1A and 1B Planned Service Areas in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There is existing 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main along Robinson Drive and Century Trail south of the site and a 8-inch DIP water main on Carl Street (west cul-de-sac). There is a 10-inch DIP water stub for the Robinson Property off of Cardinal Way and two 12-inch diameter DIP water main stubs at the intersection of Robinson Drive and Century Trail. It is feasible to extend the water main to service the proposed lots. However, the size of the water main will have to be determined and the water main will need to be looped through the site. All proposed units will be required to connect to the City's water system. • Sanitary Sewer The existing properties are identified as a Stage 1A and 1B Planned Service Areas in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and they are located in the 21 sanitary sub -district. There is existing 12-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer along Robinson Drive and 15-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer along Century Trail. A sewer stub extends to the north from the manhole at the intersection of Robinson Drive and Century Trail with an invert of 879.78. There is a sanitary manhole at the north end of Cardinal Way with an invert of 883.18. The sanitary sewer on Cardinal Way is 10- inch diameter PVC. Inverts are according to record plans for the Century Farms North development. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies future 10-inch diameter and 15-inch diameter trunk lines within the site. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also identifies future forcemain along Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) to the west of the site and future 10-inch and 12-inch trunk lines along Main Street (CSAH 14) north of the site. All proposed units will be required to connect to the City's sanitary sewer system. • Transportation The Robinson Property is located south of Main Street (CSAH 14), east of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) north of Robinson Drive and east of Century Trail. The concept plan includes an extension of Century Trail from Robinson Drive to Main Street (CSAH 14), extension of Robinson Drive to the east property line, a connection from the site to Robinson Drive at Cardinal Way and a new street access to Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) between Robinson Drive and Main Street (CSAH 14). The following summarizes the data and analysis from the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 3 Functional Existing Existing Projected Projected Roadway Classification ADT Roadway 2040 Post Recommended Improvements section ADT 2040 ADT Main St Principal 8,400 2-lane 13,700 28,000 Widen to a 4-Lane section (CSAH 14) Arterial Sunset Ave Major 2,400 2-lane 2,900 9,000 (CSAH 53) Collector Minor Extension as a 2-lane section Robinson Dr Collector na 2-lane na na from Century Trl to 4th Ave to Wood Duck Trl Minor Extension as a 2-lane section Century Trl Collector na 2-lane na na from Robinson Dr to Main St (CSAH 14) Cardinal Local na 2-lane na na Connection to development Way local street Complete east/west connection Carl St Local na 2-lane na na and connection to development local street (currently not included in Concept Plan) Based on the review of the Concept Plan the following was concluded: • The Concept Plan is generally consistent with the Transportation Section of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • The completion of Carl Street and a connection to the proposed site development streets should be included with the development plan. • A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) should be completed to document the traffic operational and safety impacts of the proposed development. The analysis would determine the turn lane and traffic control needs at the adjacent intersections and site access streets. • A second access to the multi -family area should be provided. • The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies two trail segments and a greenway through or adjacent to the proposed development. One provides a connection adjacent to Century Trail from the existing trail along Robinson Drive and the other is a new trail through the site from Century Farms North Park to the Main Street (CSAH 14) at Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) intersection. These trails should be included as part of the Concept Plan. • Wetlands The site includes wetlands along the ditches and in the area north of Carl Street. An approved wetland delineation will be required. The applicant will need to work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act regulations. • Landscaping The landscaping will be reviewed with future submittals. • Floodplain Most of the site is within the City's General Floodplain District (FEMA Zone A). A Base Flood Elevation will need to be determined and approved by FEMA. A LOMR will be required. RCWD will require floodplain mitigation. • Drainage and Utility Easements Per City Code, the City requires 10-ft wide drainage and utility (D&U) easements along plat Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 4 boundaries and along lot lines. Drainage and utility easements along lot lines are allowed to be centered on common rear and side lot lines. All trails will be required to be within D&U easements at the time of platting. Separate trail easements will need to be documented after the plat has been approved. The right-of-way for local collector roadways, Century Trail and Robinson Drive, shall be 66-ft wide. All other local roads shall have designated right-of-way that is 60-ft wide. 00 Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final platting process. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be required with the final plat. Public facilities will be covered by the City's Programmatic Maintenance Agreement. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit 6. Anoka County Right -of -Way and Access Permit 7. USACE for Wetland Alteration 8. FEMA LOMR If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee(a-)linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar(a-)wsbeng.com. Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ile CITY OF LQ� KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Environmental Memo Date: January 5tt', 2022 Re: Environmental Board Comments/January 4t', 2022/Robinson Property The Environmental Board, at their January 4t", 2022 meeting, had the following recommendations for Robinson Property Concept Plan: 1. A multi -functional, cohesive Greenway System plan shall be incorporated into the development, including trails, open space, natural areas, wetland and buffers, stormwater management features, and floodplain management. 2. A diverse mix of native plants and plants beneficial to pollinators shall be utilized wherever possible and/or practical. This should include vegetative buffers around wetlands and stormwater management features, and also in required open space and landscape plantings. 3. Wider native vegetation buffers should be included adjacent to ponds, including on rear lot lines. 0 Page 1 From: Brandon T. Ulvenes To: Katie Larsen Cc: Logan J. Keehr; Jane Rose; Nicholas Dobda; Jerry J . Auge; Sean Thiel; Jason Orcutt; Jack Forslund Subject: ACHD Preliminary Comments on Robinson Development Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:24:15 PM Attachments: image001.Dng imaae002.pnna Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Good Afternoon — Per your request, our development review team has a look at the concept plans for the Robinson Property along Main St (CSAH 14). Below are our preliminary comments and thoughts on this site. Please note that when ready, the preliminary plat will still be required to go through the standard formal review process at the County. The County has some concerns with the proposed access points onto CSAH 14 and CSAH 53. Due to the magnitude of the development being proposed, a traffic impact analysis will need to be completed for the development area for Anoka County review and approval. It will need to take into account the directional distribution of the trips to be generated, access spacing, intersection sight distance, intersection operations, safety, intersection control alternatives, recommended geometric improvements, right-of-way needs and impacts, intersection queuing, levels of service, impacts of delays, etc. on the county highways and intersections that will be impacted by this development. The traffic impact analysis should also ensure that the proposed access scheme will be compatible with any potential future development projects north of CSAH 14. The traffic impact study should define a functional intersection control type for the new street access points onto the county highway system, whether they are roundabout, right-in/right-out, three-quarter, or signalized intersection with full turn lanes. (Please note, the County has an unfunded project identified in our 5 Year HIP for the construction of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of CSAH 14 and CR 53, targeted for 2024. We had concerns regarding safety and operations of this intersection, even without the added traffic from this proposed development). Also note that per standard, the costs to implement the recommendations are typically borne by the developer. Some specific concerns and feedback we have are: • The proposed full access onto CR 53 appears to be too close to the existing access for Robinson Dr. It is our recommendation that one of these accesses would need to be a RI/RO. As proposed, the two full access locations do not meet County spacing guidelines. Whether the full access is at Robinson Dr or the newly proposed access is up to the City. Construction of a NB right turn lane and SB left turn lane would be required at the full access intersection on CR 53. 9 The County advises that construction of a trail should be considered along both CSAH 14 and CR 53 for the length of the site and that the City consider further trail construction beyond the limits of this development for logical tie-ins to the existing city street and trail network for users. Depending on the future section of CSAH 14, the trail may need to be located in a separate easement outside of the County R/W. • The City should also give consideration to including sound walls in the development agreement since there is a possibility that CSAH 14 will be reconstructed as a divided 4 lane road at some point in the future, necessitating a noise analysis and likely noise walls if federally funded. • The proposed connection from the ring -road to the extension of Century Trail is likely too close to CSAH 14 and will need to be shifted farther to south, as NB traffic queues at CSAH 14 may back-up through the intersection. The traffic analysis will likely verify this. • As noted above, a roundabout is currently planned for the intersection of CSAH 14 and CR 53. We have placed a few roundabout concept footprints at the intersection and determined that the proposed R/W dedication is not sufficient. From our preliminary review, we recommend the NW corner of the site should include a triangular R/W chamfer with 80' legs from the current proposed ROW intersection. If the traffic study proposes a roundabout at the new, western street access, then we would like a similar dedication on that corner, as well. As depicted on the concept plan, 60' of R/W along CR 53 and 75' along CSAH 14 should be adequate for future County highway reconstruction. • Utility relocation along CSAH 14 and CR 53 should be anticipated, and the County will require that utility coordination and relocation plans be included in the approved development plans for this project. County staff should be included in the utility relocation meetings for this project. • Internal site grading for the development is not to commence until the required ACHD Engineering Plan Review approvals are received and applicable permits can be issued. We appreciate the opportunity to review this development at a concept plan level. Please reach out to Logan Keehr or myself if you have any questions or would like to meet and discuss. We look forward to working with you on this project. Thanks, Brandon T. Ulvenes Anoka County Highway Department Direct — (763) 324 • 3159 Office — (763) 324 • 3100 brandon.ulvenesl@co.anoka.mn.us NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be disclosed to third parties. STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANTS: OWNERS: BACKGROUND PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A Kendra Lindahl and Kevin Shay, Landform January 12, 2022 Zoning Ordinance Update -Administration Section N/A City of Lino Lakes Multiple On March 8, 2021, the City Council authorized Landform to update the City's Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. This is one of the steps required to implement the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that was adopted by the City Council on November 9, 2020. On May 12, 2021, the P&Z Board kicked off this effort with a discussion of Planned Unit Developments (PUD). The P&Z had a robust discussion about the purpose and intent of PUDs and provided direction to staff about desired changes to the ordinance. On June 9, 2021, the P&Z board reviewed the first draft of the changes to the general provisions section. P&Z provided input to staff about the proposed revisions to the ordinance. On August 11, 2021, the P&Z board reviewed the first draft of the Planned Unit Development section of the ordinance. The P&Z provided feedback regarding the proposed changes to the ordinance. On October 4, 2021, staff provided an update on the project at the Council work session. On October 13, 2021, the P&Z board reviewed the first draft of the zoning district sections of the ordinance. The P&Z provided feedback about the proposed changes and provided input on other potential changes to the ordinance. On November 10, 2021, the P&Z board reviewed driveway width, impervious surface area, brew pub locations, garage area, side yard setbacks and porch depth to provide and input and recommendations on changes to the ordinance. ANALYSIS A redlined version of the administrative and definition sections (Sections 1007.000 — 1007.125) has been prepared which eliminates unnecessary language and inconsistencies in the document, better reflects City goals and makes the ordinance easier to read and understand. The majority of the text changes are to add language to maintain consistency in the purpose, process and requirements for each of the different sections. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) section includes the recommendations from the P&Z at the August I Ith meeting (which eliminated PUDs as conditional use permits and required all to be processed as a rezoning) and the redlines shown within the attached document are additional changes made since that meeting. The Environmental Review section (§ 1007.025) is new and outlines the process that the City will use when completing the environmental reviews required by Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules 4410. It is simply intended to notify developers that they are responsible for the City cost to prepare the documents and explains the City review process. This codifies the process that the City has followed in the past. Staff will continue to make refinements as we work through the process. In the full draft expected to be presented to P&Z in March there will likely be more significant formatting changes and additional refinements to the text. Staff will continue to highlight those changes as we move through the process. We have prepared a redlined version of the changes for review. The redlined documents are attached for your review and changes are shown in red for deleting the stricken material and adding the underlined material. Changes are shown in green for material that is moved within the document. SUMMARY The Planning & Zoning Board should review the draft changes recommended by staff and provide direction on any other desired changes. The direction will be incorporated into the full draft that will be presented early next year. Our next meeting to review ordinance revisions is February 101h and we intend to review outdoor storage and the new zoning districts identified in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Provide direction to staff on the proposed administration and definition revisions. ATTACHMENTS 1. Administration (Section 1007.000 — 1007.125) with Redlines 2. Administration (Section 1007.000 — 1007.125) Clean Version 2 ADMINISTRATION § 1007.045 ADAHNISTRATION1 AMENDMENTS: TEXT AND REZONIN MAP. oil I (1) Depending o the p,.,.;e .escribe the procedure and requirements for any change to the zoning classification, text or zoning boundaries of a property amendment to any_provision of this chapter. (2) Initiation. Amendments may be initiated by action of the City Council, recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board, or by petition of a property owner. (3) Submittal Requirements. (a) Petitions for text amendments shall include detailed written and -graphic materials fully explaining the proposed change. (-3)(b) Petitions for map amendments shall include, as determined by the Community Development Director, either site and building plans consistent with the requirements established in § 1007.020 (Site and Building Plan Review) or information required by Chapter 1000 of the City Code for a -plat submittal, shall be provided prior- to Planning and Zoning Board review. 2-1 (4) Procedure. An application for zoning (text or map) amendment shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in 1007.000 (9) of this 9ordinance. The request for the amendment shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. (b) The City shall set the date for a public hearing and have notice of such hearing published in the legal newspaper at least 10 days prior to said hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. (c) The City shall mail notice of the public hearingto o all property owners within 600 feet of any property proposed for zoning text or map amendments. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days prior to the day of the public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. Failure of any property owner to receive the mailed notification shall not invalidate the proceedings. (4)f�dLThe Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. {--'4Lej_The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: (a)L. The proposed action has been esider-oa in relation to the seeif e p heies and of and has been fiatmd to is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. (b)2. The proposed useaction is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. {O3. The proposed weaction conforms with all performance standards contained herein. (d)4. The proposed weaction can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. {05. Traffic generation by the proposed useaction is within capabilities of streets serving the property.- as described in 1007.020(4)(d). The Planning and Zoning Board ^r City Cotmeil. shall make findings �ixirr ex� icirt�6ir rv��i�i€iicrirr€ii-c r-eVest within sixty (60) days of 2-2 stafts over- only if the City sends notiee, within ten (10) business days, of r-eeeipt of the r-equest, telling the apphea-fit WhR4 infoffflati . . g. The City may extend the sixty (60) day time limit before the end of stieh time limit by providing written notiee of the extension to the applieant. The notification shall state the reasons for the extensio fact and its anticipated length, „1 1 1 not exeeed sixty (60) days, unless approved by the applieant. Failtwe of the City Gotineil to deny an appliea4ion within sixty (60) recommend approval of the r-eqtiest. if the City Getmeil denies , -e"esin-al state in writing the reasons for- e or denial at the time it denies the regtte-tof the request. Such recommendation shall be accompanied by the report and recommendation of the City staff. (9)fZLApproval of a proposed amendment shall require passage by a majority vote of all members of the City Council except that the adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial requires a four -fifths (4/5) majority vote of all members of the City Council. If the City Council denies a request, it shall state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request. fthLTkeAn amendment shall not ,.o,,,,me e ff e five ffatil se *iffiea to this chapter, adopted by the City Council approves an or-d r ee r-efleeting said amendment and after- said shall take effect immediately upon its adoption or- at stieh later- da4e as it speeifies. Evet=y other- or-dinanee shall tal e ff e± thit4J, (30) days after its publication or at such later date as it specifies. mil No application for a zoning text or map amendment -which has been denied shall be resubmitted for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of said order of denial. 2-3 § 1007.016 ! CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. (1) General Statement. Geftain uses, while generally not suitable in a paftiettlar- zo i — dis4iet,may tmder- some eir-cumstanees be suitable. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow the City to review uses, which because of their unique characteristics, cannot be permitted as of right in a particular zoning district, but which may be allowed upon showing that such use in a specified location will comply with all of the conditions and standards of this zoning Oordinance. When such circumstances exist, a conditional use permit may be granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit and an annual review of the permit smay be required. The permit shall be granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. Conditional use permits may be granted in accordance with this subdivision for any use or purpose for which such permits are required or permitted by this ordinance or as listed as a conditional use for the zoning districts provided in § 1007.080 through § 1007.132 of this ordinance. (2) Submittal Requirements. The applicant shall include as part of the application, the submittal information as identified in § 1007.020 (Site and Building Plan Review). {}Procedure. (3) The per---r applying An application for a conditional use permit shall fi„ out an s,,, n4tbe approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted b. the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a "Land Use Appheat;,,., Form"completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as estab,:s,,oa by r:... Gatm.;, ��required in §1007.000 (9) of this Oordinance. The request for conditional use permit shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning & Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. The ro os* shall be e s:ao.va ffie ally s,., muted ffid ., o The City shall set the date for a public hearing on the eenditional „se pefmits shall be held by the Planning -and have= (b) Rio...,* tee i10days p r to the p4lie hearing; notice of toe p v time a -ad plaee ,.f such public —hearing —shalt -be published in the ef€ciaflegal newspaper o€theat least 10 days prior to said hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. (c) The City and mailed shall mail notice of the public hearing to theall property owners within 350) feet of the property in question. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days prior to the day of the public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. Failure of any property owner to receive the mailed notification shall not invalidate the proceedings. 2-4 (#)tdL_The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. {g}Le)_, to The Planning and Zoning Board shall raeemmen hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use permit an mil. Its judgement shall order the issuance of Stleh ^ rMi* only if it 14Nasbe based upon, but not limited to, the following ite -i has ve been me*factors: The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the 3. The proposed de.ve rfnen4 plie ,tio , r f fms t per-f ,-,V,, needesign standards heFei and Drier applicable City Codes, ��rs�rssrs� • .r����!� 2-5 to=Feso4*@=&-'-:---:--. This plan must deteRiiine tfaffie genefated by the subdivision pfojeet, how listed in § 1007.020 (4) of this tr-affie eeatr-ibtites to the total tr-affie, and the time . - ants. The plan also m-ust examine finaneing eptions, ineluding pfejeet eentr-ibtAien an the evest sh—ar-ing among other- jtNisdietions and other- pr-epet4ies, that eentr-ibute to tr-affie a4 th interchange-. 9ordinance -5-.2_Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 6-.3_Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. (h) Whether- The Planning and Zoning Board r-eeefamends denial or- approval of a eenditienal use pefmit or- the Gotineilorders- stieh denial proud, shall in^'�, t� r-eeemmen&tiens or detef inatioNmake findings Hof fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the ways in _hiewhieh the proposed e does r does not eomply with the standards established in -request as they deem necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this ,- na •r oe. Mel {�L Chapter. Such recommendation shall be made in writing and accompanied by the report and recommendation of City Cetmeil must approve er- deny the appheatieft information. The sixty (60) day time limit starts over- only if the City sends notice, within ten (10) business days of r-eeeipt of the r-e"est, telling the applieant what infofmation is missing. The City may extend the sixty (60) day time limit before the end of stieh time limit by providing wr-itten notiee of the extension to the applieant. The notifleation must state the reasons for- the exteasi and its a*fieipated length, whieh may not exeeed sixty (60) days, tmiess approved by the apphea Failttr-e of the City Cotmeil to deny an applieation within sixty (60) days is approval of the r-e"est. if the City Council denies a request, it must state in wFiting the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the r ^Astaff (g) Upon receiving- the and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board and the City staff, the City Council shall make a recorded finding of fact and may impose any condition they consider necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. q) hL_Following approval of the conditional use permit, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Title. {1���Tf ^^„s*^ ^*i^n''^s not b^^+ „ within one "` ^ Expiration. Unless the plate of he -City Council specifically approves a different time when action is officially taken on the request, conditional use „o,mitor- if substantial ^ rstfuetio has not take„ rlaeo within three «) years Hermits which have been issued under the provisions of this chapter shall expire, unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year of issuanee-- e date the conditional use permit, the pefmit is void. is issued; or, unless before the expiration of the one year period; the applicant shall apply for an extension thereof by completing and submitting a request for extension. The request for extension shall state facts showing a ,good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the conditional use permit. A request for an extension not exceeding one year shall be subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Should a second extension of time or any extension of time longer than one year be requested by the agpplicant, it shall be presented to the planning commission for a recommendation and to the City Council for a decision. A conditional use specified in the permit expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one (1) year. (00)--If a time limit of periodic review is included as a condition by which a conditional use permit is granted, the conditional use permit may be reviewed at a public hearing with notice of said hearing published at least terr(10) days prior to the review; it shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to schedule such public hearings and the owner of land having a conditional use permit shall not be required to pay a fee for said review. (m)fk)_Any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the conditional use permit issued shall require an amended conditional use permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being issued. An amended conditional use permit application and requests for changes in conditions shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a conditional use permit. 2-7 (n)qL_All uses existing as of July 14, 1997 that are included in the list of conditional uses for the zoning district in which they are located -shall be considered as having a conditional use permit which contains conditions -that permit the land use and structures as they existed on said date. Any enlargement, structural alteration, or intensification of such use shall require an amended conditional use permit as provided for above. (OCm)-No application for a conditional use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of said order of denial. (-3)(4) Revocation. If an approved conditional use permit is in violation of this 'ordinance or the conditions of permit approval, the City may initiate a process to revoke the conditional use permit. The City shall then conduct a public hearing to consider the revocation of a conditional use permit. Notifications shall be distributed and published according to paragraph (2)(3 b and c) The public hearing shall be conducted by the Planning & Zoning Board, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council. In considering revocation, the Board and the City Council shall consider compliance with the approved conditions of the conditional use permit and the standards listed in paragraph (2)(g3)e). The City may also conduct a public hearing and consider revocation if the time requirements of paragraph (32)(1£i) have not been met. (OL( Following a vote by the City Council to revoke the conditional use permit, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Title. § 1007.017 ! INTERIM USE PERMITS. (1) Purpose ��. The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses is: (a) To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is obtained or while the permanent location is under construction. (b) To allow a use that is presently judged acceptable by the City Council, but that with anticipated development or redevelopment, will not be acceptable in the future or will be replaced in the future by a permitted or conditional use allowed within the respective district. (c) To allow a use which is reflective of anticipated long range change to an area and which is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan provided that said use maintains harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and is in keeping with the architectural character and design standards of existing uses and development. (2) Procedure. ••la...... .... ...... 1ILL11121MOLI KI aeeer-ding to the siibmit4a! ,Uses defined as "interim uses" shall be processed accordin - to o the standards and procedures for a conditional use permit as established by § 1007.016 of this O ordinance. (2}tbLGeneral Standards. An interim use shall comply with the following: ONV 1. Meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in § 1007.016 of this 9fIdina-neeordinance. 2. Conforms to the applicable performance standards of this O ordinance. 3. The use is allowed in an interim use in the respective zoning district. 4. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. 2-9 5. The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. 6. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deem appropriate for permission of the use. (3) Termination. An interim use shall terminate on the happening of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: (a) The date stated in the permit. (b) Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued. (c) Upon change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the use non -conforming. (d) The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district. (4) Revocation. If an approved interim use permit is in violation of this Ofdinanee ordinance or the conditions of permit approval, the City may initiate a process to revoke the interim use permit. The City shall then conduct a public hearing to consider the revocation of an interim use permit. Notifications shall be distributed and published according to paragraph (2). The public hearing shall be conducted by the Planning & Zoning Board, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council. In considering revocation, the Board and the City Council shall consider compliance with the approved conditions of the interim use permit and the standards listed in paragraph (3)2)fb). 2-10 § 1007.018 VARIANCES AND APPEALS. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for deviations from the requirements of this Chapter, and to provide for the appeal of an interpretation of legislative intent of the provisions of this chapter. (2) Board Designation. The City Council shall serve as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. (3) Variances. Variances from the requirements of this ordinance, including restrictions placed on nonconformities, may be granted under the following conditions: (a) Criteria and Findings of Fact. No variance shall be ,granted unless it meets all the criteria in par�phs 1. through 6. or unless par�ph 7. applies. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the 9ordinance. 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the 9ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the 9ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. 6. A variance shall not be ,granted for any use that is not allowed under the 9ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. 7. In accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be -ram for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statute 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning 9ordinance. (b) Submittal Requirements. Applications for variances shall be filed with the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the following submittal information: 1. Proof of title and contract/purchase agreement and/or property owner signature on the application form when applicable. 2. Certificate of survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor in compliance with the requirements in 1007.020(2) b) of the 9ordinance. The Community Development Department 2-11 may waive the certificate of survey when the survey will not provide information relevant to the variance necessary to review the application. 3. Graphic information, plans, specifications, or other materials that illustrate the requested variance. 4. Narrative description of how the application complies with the variance criteria listed below. (c) Procedures. Var-i pees from the requirements of this n,-a;,,�,, o rdifie s An application for a variance shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is .granted b t�pplicant. Additional City requirements for variances are as follows: 1. The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in 1007.000 (9) of this 9ordinance. 2. The request for variance shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the Citv Council. 4. The petitioner or representative may ppear before the Planning and Zoning Board in order to present information or to answer questions. The Board shall make a recommendation to the City Council including findings on compliance with required criteria and conditions to be imposed. 5. The City Council may grant the variance if it has been established that the application complies with the required criteria. The City shall decide upon requests for variance by approving- o�ying the same in part or in whole. 6. The City may pose conditions in the granting of variances. Conditions must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. 7. The City Council shall, on all variance applications whether granted or denied, record findings of fact. Such findings shall be recorded in writing and shall state the City Council's reasons for such action. If the City Council denies an application, it shall state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the application. However, when a vote on a resolution or properly made motion to approve an application fails for any reason, the failure shall constitute a denial of the application provided that those voting against the motion state on the record the reasons why they oppose the application. 2-12 8. Following ap]2roval of the variance, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. (4) Appeal. An appeal shall only be qpplicable to an administrative permit, order, requirement or interpretation of intent of provisions of this Oordinance. Opinions and evaluations as they pertain to the impact or result of a request are not subject to the appeal procedure. (a) Procedure. An appeal from an administrative action shall be filed by the property owner or their agent with the Zoning Administrator within 10 days after the making of the order, requirement, or interpretation being appealed. 1. The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator an application for appeal statingthe he specific grounds upon which the appeal is made. Said application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by City Council Oordinance. In cases where the application is judged to be incomplete, the Zoning Administrator shall notify the applicant, in writing„ within 10 days of the date of submission. 2. An appeal staysproceedings and the furtherance of the action being appealed unless it is certified to the Board of Adjustment Appeals, after the notice of appeal is filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would cause imminent peril to life and property. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports when appropriate and shall provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the action to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 4. The Board of Appeals and Adjustment shall consider the application for appeal at aapublic meeting and consider testimony of the property owner and City staff. 5. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall make its decision within 60 days the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted b. t�pplicant. 6. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the Board upon the applicant by mail. . ,f ono fi ,,,,,.i-apin e sha4l be filed , ,4 the r,,,,,,,,,,unit„ Deyel,,,.ment norator* ,,,,a shall be aeeemoanied by the fell,,,,,;,, , „1.mitta inn ,.,,, ,�ieii 2-13 , it7,iJi�il�i,i�lt�i, <�.eJil►,Z�.��,ili�7iJii�i I ZJ�i:�l2iJln 1A2 I �iia�ac. si.z 2-14 [�Jilrr4•r �7ili •rT�A'Ir ir7 ��♦�l•rr�Ri-/�r�l�/�f••��irL r�l'��)if•rrai�77r�\L•�i♦�ii��7: �. L�'L•7Ji• [�Jilrr4•r n��/itRrir�/f-,il�r•�Re��l•J-Ii�rri\�f rir' I IN Jim - ON In .1- ll I I Him Lri���rir����i i•�•rrr�iin��i �rrr���1r ••�� 2-15 ev-: • .. �ssr.�fers�e�rr��s�s�sr�r�s�rr!*ser��E�.e�s�s���s�r .nagiliama :.__,.......:.�:.....:..:........:., .�::.�:...r ��.�reerssr�:risrssee ::ere ee�s�e!� ffM! i.MEN ±ri,I �s!isset _ ■ . • limp* •A 2-16 WIN all 2-17 § 1007.019 ADMINISTRATION: ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS AND APPROVALS. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish regulations and procedures for the processing and consideration of activities allowed by administrative permit, and of matters requiring the approvals of the Zoning Administrator with the goal of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. 2 Submittal Requirements. The information required for all administrative permit or approval applications shall include: a) The applicant shall include as part of the application, the applicable submission information as identified in § 1007.020 Site and Building Plan Review. The Zoning Administrator may waive submission information not deemed necessary for the administrative review. b) A concise statement describing the proposed use, event or activity, including the uroose, type of merchandise involved, dates and times of operation, number of employees involved, provisions for on -site security, provisions for on -site parking, and other pertinent information required by the Zoning Administrator to fully evaluate the application. {}Procedure. (3) Applicatio An application for a radministrative permit shall be filgdapproved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: {a) --The property owner or desigtatedtheir agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator on fet:ms to be pfovided by the Gity. ,"-"(a) ppliea4iens for-radmiaistfa iye peflii s or-administratl'F a approvals shall be a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as established by Gity r,., nei or -din „eerequired in § 1007.000(9 of this Oordinance. (0jb)_The Zoning Administrator shall review the applications and related materials and shall determine whether the proposal is in compliance with all applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and applicable performance standards set forth in this Ordinance. The Zoning days of the date of stibmission. 2-18 HIM 2-19 (#)LcIA written report or letter of approval shall be issued to the applicant when a determination of compliance has been made. Specific conditions to assure compliance with applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and the standards of this I've ordinance shall be attached to the permit or letter. Wf.dLDetermination of non-compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and the standards in this paragraph shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and the application for the permit shall be considered denied; unless, within ten-(10) days of the date of such notice, the applicant submits revised plans and/or information with which the Zoning Administrator is able to determine compliance. (-h)LeLUnresolved disputes as to administrative application of the requirements of this paragraph shall be subject to appeal as outlined in § 1007.018 of this 9 aneeordinance. - ------------- - --------- • - - - - -- - -- - - --- -- ------ - - ---- - - - - - - (4) eif mia nee Standards. All uses, events, or activities allowed by administrative permit shall conform to the applicable standards outlined in the zoning district in which such use, event or activity is proposed. (5) Administration and Enforcement. (a) The Zoning Administrator shall keep a record of applications and administrative permits or approvals. (b) A copy of all administrative permits issued shall be forwarded to appropriate staff as determined by the Zoning Administrator. (c) Enforcement of the provisions of this paragraph shall be in accordance with § 1007.023 of this Or-dinaneeordinance. Violation of an issued permit or of the provisions of this section also shall be grounds for denial of future permit applications. 2-20 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-21 § 1007.020 SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. {(1) �ctect�Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish Site Plan Review procedures and provides regulations pertaining to the enforcement of site design standards consistent with the requirements of this chapter. All site and building plans for multiple family, commercial, industrial or public/semi-public uses shall require review and approval by the Community Development Department. Relocated structures shall also require a site and building plan review as required by § 1007.046. {74(21 "„„' ra' &ffs�Submittal Requirements. Applications for site and building plan review shall be filed with the Zening Administfater- a -ad shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee an include the following submittal information: (a) Proof of title and contract/purchase agreement and property owner signature on the application form when applicable. feet. � .. erar.�■.��ess�s�ieea:�.rs�r!�:e�er!*.�i!�ri!�r:ra:�ye�s!�E�. _ (Oth�_Certificate of Survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor identifying the following: 1. Scale (engineering only) at not less than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) 2. North point indication. 3. Existing boundaries with lot dimension and lot area. 4. Existing buildings, structures and improvements. 5. Easements of record 6. Delineated wetland boundary, to include the OHWL of any lakes or DNR waters. 7. All encroachments. 8. Legal description. (oLcc,_Site Plan using the current Certificate of Survey as a base depicting the following: 2-22 1. Name of project or development. 2. Name and address of developer and/or owner. 3. Name and address of engineer/architect/designer. 4. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. 5. All proposed improvements, including: a. Required and proposed setbacks. b. Location, setback and dimensions of all proposed buildings and structures. c. Location of all adjacent buildings and structures within one hundred (100) feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. d. Location, number, dimensions of all proposed parking stalls, loading areas and drive aisles, with curbing shown. e. Location, width and setbacks of all proposed street accesses and driveways. f. Location, width and setbacks of all proposed sidewalks, walkways and trails. g. Location and type of all proposed lighting, including fixture details. h. Provisions for storage and disposal of waste, garbage and recyclables, including details for enclosing and screening exterior containers. 6. Calculations for impervious/pervious surfaces. (O(d)--Grading Plan (using the current Certificate of Survey as a base) depicting the following: 1. Existing contours at two- (2) foot intervals. 2. Proposed grade elevations at two- (2) foot maximum intervals. 3. Drainage plan, including the configuration of drainage areas and calculations. 4. Spot elevations. 5. Surface water ponding and treatment areas. 6. Erosion control measures. 7. Wetland replacement plan (when applicable). 2-23 8. Soil borings. 9. Drainage calculations for 2-, 10-, & 100-year storm events. 10. Delineated wetland boundary, to include OHWL of any lakes or DNR waters. 11. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. (4)(ejLandscaping Plan using the current Certificate of Survey as a base depicting the following: 1. Planting schedule including: a. Symbols. b. Quantities. c. Common and botanical names. d. Sizes of plant materials. e. Root specification (bare root, balled/burlapped, potted, etc.). f. Special installation instructions. 2. Tree Preservation Plan: location, type and size of all significant trees to be removed or preserved. (see tree plan requirements in § 1007.043 (17)(d)-))) 3. Planting detail (show all species to scale at normal mature crown diameter or spread for local hardiness zone). 4. Typical sections with details of fences, tie walls, planter boxes, tot lots, picnic areas and the like. 5. Typical sections with details of landscape islands, planter beds, and foundation plantings with identification of materials to be used. 6. Delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with respective areas measured in square feet. 7. Coverage plan for underground irrigation systems, if any. 8. Other existing or proposed conditions that could be anticipated to affect landscaping. 9. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. W L-Photometric Lighting Plan, to include fixture details/cut sheets/drawings. 2-24 1. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. NfZLArchitectural Plans. 1. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. 2. Architectural elevations, IN COLO in color, of all principal and accessory buildings and structures (type, color, and materials used in all exterior surfaces). 3. Typical floor plan and typical room plan drawn to scale with a summary of square footage by use or activity. O)JUUtility Plan. 1. Location of hydrants, valves and manholes, if any. 2. Location, sizing, and type of water and sewer system mains and proposed service connections, hydrants, valves, and manholes; or, 3. Location and size of proposed primary and secondary on -site treatment systems, when allowed. 4. Storm sewer, catch basins, invert elevation, type of castings and type of materials (refer to Engineering Manual for City standards). 5. Date of plan preparations and dates of any subsequent revisions. 4)LlhOther plans and information as may be required by the Zoning Administrator which may include (but not be limited to) the following: 1. Location, type and size (area and height) of all signs to be erected upon the subject property. 2. Vicinity map showing the subject property in relation to nearby highways or major street intersections. 3. Sound source control plan. 4. Fire protection plan. 5. Proposed protective covenants or private restrictions. 6. Where landscaping or man-made materials are used to provide screening from adjacent properties, a cross section shall be provided showing the perspective of the site from neighboring properties at the property line elevation. 2-25 (k)aFor applications for new communication towers, the application must include information to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of § 1007.054, including but not limited to: 1. Demonstration that a significant gap in coverage exists that would be resolved by the proposed location and that adequate service cannot be provided utilizing existing structures within a two (2) mile search radius of the proposed site. 2. Structural design information to ensure compliance with manufacturer specifications and to ensure the tower can accommodate additional antennas (co -location). use. 3. Authorization from the property owner if different from applicant. 4. Lease or agreement requiring removal of the tower and facilities after cessation of 5. Copies of applicable federal, state, and local licenses, permits, approvals. (3) Procedure. An application for site and building plan review shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements for site and building plan review are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in 1007.000 (9) of this 9ordinance. b) The Zoning Administrator shall forward conies of the application and site and building plans to the appropriate stafficonsultants and governmental agencies for review and recommendation. The Community Development Department shall perform a review and approve or deny the application. The Community Development Department may also suggest such conditions as they deem necessary to the approval of the site and building plans. c) The applicant may appeal any denial or decision by the Department according to § 1007.018. {$�-No application for a site and building plan review shall be resubmitted for a period of R NOW ion -------------- �. Will. -� 2-26 sixty (60) day time limit before the end of sueh time limit by pr-oviding written flotiee of extension to the apphea*t. The notifieation Shall state the r-easons fof the extension a -ad its antieipated length, w-hieh may not exeeed sixty (60) days, tMiess approved by the applie Failufe of the Department to deny an applieation within sixty (60) days is approval of the request, if the Depat4fneat denies a request, it shall state in writing the reasons for- the denial at the time it denies the request. (d) okwelve(12) months from the date of said order of denial. e) The Community Development Department shall provide to the City Council reports summarizing submitted site and building plan applications and outcomes regarding approval or denial as they occur. 4 Per ormance Standards. Plans which fail to meet the followin criteria shall not be as p 40 41 C�CY v (a) The proposed development application -must be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan4neftiding_ b) The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. d) Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: 2-27 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivisiendevelopment is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivisiendevelopment will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivisiendevelopment is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivisiendevelopment will not degrade the level of service below C. 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivisiendevelopment is D, traffic generated by a proposed s4divisiendevelopment will not degrade the level of service below D. 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the su-bdivision.proposed development. If the existing level of service is E or F, the c��'�ision-developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the si ionproposed development must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6. The traffic generated from a proposed sttbdivisiendevelopment shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 6-.-The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in coniunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. , ��r.��!:�sr�:reraze!e!srsir.�r�c�i� ■ 2-28 tion with Anoka Gotinty and the Minnesota Dept. of Tr-anspofta4ioa, and a plan must bee This plan must determine traffic generated by the s4di roposed development project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. (e) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. (f) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate or safe sanitary sewer system. (g) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. () hLFire prevention and fighting equipment acceptable to the Board of Fire Underwriters and City Council shall be readily available when any activity involving the handling or storage of flammable or explosive materials is carried on. Nt( Expiration. Activities authorized by site and building plan approval shall be initiated within six (6) months. The time limits established in this paragraph may be extended by the Zoning Administrator_ 6) Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Financial Guarantee. Following the agpproval of the site plan required by this title where no public improvements are proposed and before issuance of a buildings permit, the applicant, as determined to be necessary by the Zoning Administrator, shall ,guarantee to the City the completion of all improvements as shown on the approved site plan and as required by the site plan approval. This guarantee shall be made by means of a site improvement performance agreement and a financial guarantee as provided below: (a) The applicant shall execute the site improvement performance agreement on forms provided by the City. The agreement shall be approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and shall define the required work and reflect the terms of this chapter as to the required guarantee for the performance of the work by the applicant. (b) The required work includes, but is not limited to private exterior amenities such as landscaping=private driveways, parking areas, recreation fields, drainage systems, stormwater 2-29 basins, sanitary sewer systems, water mains, wetland mitigation, wetland buffers, erosion control, curbing, fences and screening, and other similar facilities. The required work shall also include all aspects of a tree preservation plan, if applicable. (c) A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the executed site performance agreement as provided herein: 1. Financial ,guarantees acceptable to the City include cash escrow; an irrevocable letter of credit; or other financial instruments which provide equivalent assurance to the City and which are approved by the Zoning Administrator. 2. The term of the financial ,guarantee shall be for the life of the site improvement performance agreement, and it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that a submitted financial guarantee shall continue in full force and effect until the Zoning Administrator shall have approved and accepted all of the work undertaken to be done and shall thereby have released the guarantee or reduced the amount of the guarantee as provided in this chapter. 3. When any instrument submitted as a financial guarantee contains a provision for an automatic expiration date, after which the instrument may not be drawn upon, notwithstanding the status of the site performance agreement or of the required work, the expiration date shall be October 31; further, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to notify the City in writing, by certified mail, at least 60 days in advance of the expiration date of the intention to renew the instrument or to not renew the instrument. If the instrument is to be renewed, a written notice of extension shall be provided 30 days prior to the expiration date; if the instrument is not to be renewed, and has not been released by the Zoning Administrator, another acceptable financial guarantee in the appropriate amount shall be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expiration. The term of any extension shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Upon receipt of an acceptable substitute financial ,guarantee, the Zoning Administrator may release the original guarantee. 4. The amount of the financial guarantee shall be established by the Zoning Administrator based upon an itemized estimate of the cost of all required work as provided by the applicant. A cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be in the amount of 35% for private improvements and 125% for public improvements of the approved estimated cost. The amount of any other approved financial instrument shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. 5_TE4h-&-appne=shall, upon eompletion of site and building plan r-evi€w;submit te the City an agfeement that they will ea -use all impfovements ealled for- in the site and building pla- review to be eompleted within the time speeifted by the City. Per-foffflanee of sueb eon4r-aets sh City Counei .the option of the City, the applicant may submit a separate financial guarantee for that portion of the required work consisting solely of landscaping improvements with another financial guarantee for all other exterior amenities and improvements which comprise the work. All trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for 12 months from the 2-30 time of planting. Any subsequent replacement shall be warranted for 12 months from the time of planting_ (d) The time allowed for completion of the required improvements shall be set out in the site improvement performance agreement. The agreement and the financial guarantee shall provide for forfeiture to the City to cure a default or reimburse the City the cost of enforcement measures. As various portions of such required work are completed by the applicant, are in compliance with City requirements, and are approved by the City, the Zoning Administrator may release such portion of the financial guarantee as is attributable to such completed work. Landscapes improvements shall not be deemed complete until the City has verified survivability of all required plantings through one "winter season" which is defined for the purpose of this section as the period October 31 through April 30. (e) The applicant shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing when all or a portion of the required improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plan and maX be inspected. Upon receipt of such notice, the Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for the inspection of the improvements to determine that the useful life of all work performed meets the standards for the particular industry, profession, or material used in the performance of the work. Any required work failing to meet such standards shall not be deemed to be complete and the applicant shall be notified in writing as to required corrections. Upon determination that the work has been completed, including the winter season survivability of all landscape improvements, a notice of the date of actual completion shall be given to the applicant and appropriate action, to release or to reduce the amount of the financial guarantee shall be taken by the Zoning Administrator. 2-31 § 1007.021 DUTIES OF CITY STAFF. The offices of the Zoning Administrator and Building Official are hereby established; official(s) shall be appointed by the government body and serve at its pleasure. (1) Duties of the Zoning Administrator. The Community Development Director or desi_ngnee shall be the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance as provided herein; in addition to the duties and powers of the Zoning Administrator under this O ordinance, express or implied, -the Zoning Administrator shall have the duty and power to: (a) Issue permits required by this ordinance. (b) Maintain all records necessary for the enforcement of this ordinance; including, but not limited to, all data, maps, amendments, rezonings, and conditional use permits, variances, appeal notices, certificates of occupancy, and applications thereof, nonconforming uses. (c) Receive, file and forward all appeals, notices, applications for variances, conditional use permits, certificates of occupancy, or other matters to the appropriate officials or boards. (d) Serve as ex-officio, non -voting member of the Planning and Zoning Board. (e) Perform all duties set forth in job description. (2) Duties of the Building Official. The Building Official shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance as provided herein; in addition to the duties and powers of the Building Official under this ordinance, express or implied, the Building Official shall have the duty and power to: (a) Conduct inspections of land, buildings or structures at reasonable times, to determine compliance with and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. (b) Perform annual and/or periodic review of all conditional use permits. (c) Institute in the name of the City any appropriate actions or proceedings to enforce this ordinance. (d) Perform all duties set forth in job description. 2-32 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-33 § 1007.022 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (-3)(1) No person may change the use of any land except for construction of essential services and transmission lines or occupy or utilize a new structurally altered building (except single-family detached dwellings or their accessory buildings or private garages in any district) or change the use of any building after the effective date of this ordinance unless he has first obtained a certificate of occupancy. (4)(2) Application for a certificate of occupancy for a new building or for an existing building which has been so altered or the reuse of any land may be filed with the Building Official any time after the application for a building permit. The Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued within ten -(I 0) days after the construction or alteration of such building or part thereof or site has been completed in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance and building code. Pending the issuance of said certificate, a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued, subject to the provisions of the building code and zoning ordinance for a period not to exceed 12) months during the completion of the erection or the alteration of such a building. The temporary certificate shall not be construed as in any way altering the respective rights, duties or obligations of the owners or of the community relating to the use or occupancy of the premises or any other matter, except under such restrictions and provisions as will adequately ieensure the safety of the occupants. The use of any structure for which a building permit is required or the use of any land shall be considered a violation of this ordinance unless a certificate of occupancy has been issued. (5)(3) Application for a certificate of occupancy for a new use of land shall be made to the Building Official before any such land shall be so used. Such certificate of occupancy shall be issued within teii--(10) days after this application if the use is in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. (6)(4) A record of all certificates of occupancy shall be kept on file with the City. 2-34 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-35 § 1007.023 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES. (1) Administration and Enforcement. (a) This Or-dinanee ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Administrator who is appointed by the City Council. The Zoning Administrator may institute in the name of the City of Lino Lakes any appropriate actions or proceedings against a violator as provided by statute, ordinance, or code. (b) If the provisions of this Ordinance ordinance are being violated, the City shall notify, in writing, the person responsible for such violations, indicating the nature of the violation and ordering the action necessary to correct it. The City shall order discontinuance of illegal use of land, buildings or structures; removal of illegal buildings or structures or of additions, alterations or structural changes thereto; discontinuance of any illegal work being done; or shall take any other action authorized by this Section to instffeensure compliance with or to prevent violation of its provisions. (2) Penalties, Violations, and Enforcement. In addition to the remedies set out in the paragraph above, the City may enforce any provisions of this Ordinance by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. 2-36 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-37 § 1007.024 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD). (1) Purpose. The purpose of the PUD zoning district is to provide a district that grants flexibility from certain zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. It is further intended that PUDs are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, a higher level of urban amenities, preservation of natural open space, and more economical efficient use of land. (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. (c) The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. (d) A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. (e) An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. (f) A mix of land use types. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (3) All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit in all zoning districts shall be potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the City's Comprehensive Plan. (4) The standards outlined in the following City Code Sections serve as development guidelines within PUDs: Table 1 PUD Land Use Development Standards Low -Density Residential R-1, Seetie*-§1007.090 R-1X, cow§1007.091 R-2, tie*-§ 1007.093 2-38 Low -Density Mixed Residential R-1, See ear§1007.090 R-2, c o§ 1007.093 Medium -Density Residential R-2, Seetieir§1007.093 R-3, c o§ 1007.094 High -Density Residential R-4, Seetiefr§1007.095 R-6, c o§ 1007.096 Planned Residential / Commercial R-4, Beet ear§1007.095 NB, Seetieii-§ 1007.110 LB, Seetiefr§1007.111 Office Residential R-2, Seetiefr§1007.093 R-3, cow§1007.094 NB, Seetiefr§ 1007.110 LB, lion—§1007.111 GB, Seetiefr§ 1007.112 Signature Gateway R-3, cow§1007.094 R-4, Seetiefr§1007.095 NB, Seetieir§ 1007.110 GB, Seetiefr§ 1007.112 Commercial NB, cow§1007.110 LB, Seetie*r§ 1007.111 GB, c o§ 1007.112 Town Center R-4, cow§1007.095 GB, Seetiefr§ 1007.112 Business Campus GB, Seetiefr§1007.112 LI, Seetieir§ 1007.121 Industrial LI, Seetiefr§1007.121 GI, Seetien-§ 1007.122 (a) The lot and yard standards, impervious surface coverage, building requirements and height regulations of the closest conventional zoning district shall be used as the regulations, but may be departed from to accomplish the purposes described in § 1007.024(2) of this 'ordinance. (b) The standards outlined in the General Provisions section of the Zoning Ordinance serve as guidelines, but may be departed from to accomplish the purposes described in § 1007.024(2) of this 'ordinance. (c) The aforementioned are guidelines only and not development standards. (5) General Requirements for a Planned Unit Development (PUD). (a) Public or common open space at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements established in this Ofdinanee ordinance and such complementary structures and improvements as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the PUD shall be provided within the area of the PUD. 2-39 (b) If a PUD includes provision of affordable housing, a specific housing type, or target housing price, details associated with the housing - including number of units, unit size, and price - shall be documented in a legally binding agreement approved by the City and recorded against the properties within the PUD. (c) If a PUD includes preservation of natural habitat, those habitats shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement approved by the City and recorded against the properties within the PUD. (d) A common or homeowner's association shall be established where appropriate to ensure on -going maintenance of infrastructure and public spaces, required restoration and management of natural areas, or other actions and activities specific to the PUD. (e) A residential PUD may include a variety of residential dwelling units, including, but not limited to single family and multifamily units as long as it complies with the density requirements. A non-residential PUD may include a variety of commercial and/or industrial uses. A PUD may also include a mix of residential and non-residential uses. (f) Recreational open space or trail corridors intended as public parks or public trails shall be dedicated to the City or granted through an easement. Management and maintenance of the public recreational areas shall be the responsibility of the City. (g) Street, Private. 1. Private streets within the project shall have an improved surface to twenty-six (26) feet or more in width and shall be so designed as to permit the City emergency vehicles to provide protection to each building. 2. No portion of the required private street system shall be used in calculating required off-street parking space or be used for parking. (h) As part of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat approval, a Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant, builder, or developer shall execute the Agreement. The Agreement shall detail all use restrictions and required on and off -site improvements conditional to the PUD rezoning. (6) Urban Residential Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) Urban residential PUDs shall be applied only to residential Zoning Districts served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. (b) The maximum allowable density within an urban residential PUD shall be consistent with the density directives of the Comprehensive Plan. (c) Open Space Performance Standards. 1. A minimum of fgty—(50�tW o of the gross land area shall be reserved as common open space for Townhomes. MKI 1A 2. Each open space lot or outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or trail corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification, as specified in Seetien—§1001.099 of the Lino Lakes Subdivision O ordinance. 3. Common open space shall provide a unified landscape for the use and enjoyment of the neighborhood community and/or the general public. 4. Open space shall be exclusive of unit lots and driveways. Street rights -of -way, parking lots, and driveways shall be designed to maximize tree preservation, natural habitat, and wetland protection. 5. All open space shall be platted as lots or outlots held as open space in perpetuity. Outlots designated as Public trail corridors shall be conveyed by fee title or by easement. (d) Neighborhood Performance Standards. 1. To provide an identity and create a cohesive development pattern, residential units/buildings shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which they have in common. Such identity may be accomplished by one or more of the following features: a. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that a majority of the principal structures take visual advantage of a field, wetland, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that a majority of the principal structure will take visual advantage of a green, playground, ball field, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. c. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that the principal structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, landscaped medians, sidewalks, trails, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. (e) Yards. 1. The front, rear and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the PUD site shall be the same as imposed in the respective base districts. 2. Buildings shall maintain a minimum separation of ten -(I 0) feet. (7) Commercial or Industrial Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) Commercial or Industrial PUDs shall be applied only to commercial or industrial zoning districts served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. (b) Open Space Performance Standards. 2-41 1. The PUD design shall result in greater landscaped pervious area than the base zoning district standard. 2. The PUD site design shall result in the protection of important natural features (e.g., wetlands, significant trees, water courses, slopes over twelve (2) peree +'.12L/o 3. The PUD design shall include extensive landscaping with an emphasis on streetscape, site entrances, and the perimeter of the building. (c) Commercial and industrial buildings shall comply with design standards of §1007.043(2)(d) of this 'ordinance. A PUD shall consist of a harmonious arrangement and selection of land uses in groupings of buildings that are planned and designed as an integrated unit. The integrated design shall include elements such as building orientation and materials, utilities, parking areas, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and open spaces. (8) Mixed Residential, Commercial and/or Industrial Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) PUD's including a mix of residential, commercial, and/or industrial uses shall follow the applicable provisions of (6) and (7) above. (9) Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development. (a) Prior to submitting a PUD application, the property owner/applicant shall meet with the Community Development Department to generally describe the proposed PUD. The primary purpose of the conference is to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of the proposal and its conformity to the provisions of this 'vice ordinance before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. (b) Prior to submitting a PUD Concept Plan application, the property owner/applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting for informal comment and feedback. (c) PUD Concept Plan Application. 1. The PUD Concept Plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development before incurring substantial cost. The evaluation of the Concept Plan shall include but not be limited to the following criteria: a. Overall maximum PUD density range. b. General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. c. General location and extent of public and common open space. d. General location of residential and non-residential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. 2-42 e. A staging and time schedule of development. f. Other special criteria for development. 2. PUD Concept Plan Submission Information. a. Information for Concept Plan as specified in § 1001.026 of this 'ordinance. b. An aerial photograph at a scale of not less than one (1) inch equals one hundr-e (100) feet, depicting the proposed development of the subject property and all land within five h 500) feet and showing the precise location of existing streets. c. Schematic drawing of the proposed PUD including, but not limited to, the general location of major street and pedestrian ways, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. d. An estimate of the total number of dwelling and/or other units and a tabulation of the following land uses expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area: Area devoted to residential and non-residential uses. ii. Area devoted to residential use by building or structure or use type. iii. Area devoted to common open space. iv. Area devoted to public open space. v. Area devoted to streets. vi. Area, and potential floor area, devoted to commercial uses. vii. Area, and potential floor area, devoted to industrial or office uses. e. If the PUD will be developed in different phases, the applicant shall submit a phasing plan for construction of the various elements of the entire PUD. f. If the PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. g. Minutes from the required neighborhood meeting. 3. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Concept Plan submission to the City's advisory boards and City Council for their informal review and comment on the project's consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations at regularly scheduled meetings. 2-43 (d) PUD Preliminary Plan Application 1. The purpose of the PUD Preliminary Plan is to provide a master plan of the entire development upon which the Planning and Zoning Board will base its recommendation to the City Council. The PUD Preliminary Plan serves as a complete and permanent public record of the entire PUD and the manner in which it is to be developed. 2. Following review of the PUD Concept Plan, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Department a PUD Preliminary Plan, rezoning and preliminary plat applications. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall refine the PUD Concept Plan. 3. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Preliminary Plan submission to the City's advisory boards and City Council for their consideration at regularly scheduled meetings.. where the related rezoning _ and preliminaryplat applications are being considered. 4. The evaluation of the proposed PUD Preliminary Plan shall include but not be limited to the following criteria: a. The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto public rights -of -way does not create congestion or dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project residents and the general public. b. A sufficient amount of useable open space is provided. c. The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. d. The development is in compliance with the requirements of the Lino Lakes City Code except where modified by the PUD. 5. The PUD Preliminary Plan submission shall include but not be limited to: a. Information for Site and Building Review as specified in § 1007.020 of this O eordinance. b. Information for Preliminary Plat as specified in § 1001.041 of this Or-dina-neeordinance. c. Location, designation and total area of all common open space. d. Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. e. A tabulation of all land uses expressed in square footage and as a percent of the total project area. 2-44 f. Identification of existing natural resource areas and the proposed method for protection and restoration of these areas. g. A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD, the market which it is intended to serve, its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how it is to be designed, arranged and operated. h. Where deemed necessary, a market feasibility study including an analysis of the proposals economic impact on the City. i. A statement summarizing all changes which have been made in any document, plan data or information previously submitted, together with revised copies of any such document, plan or data. j. Such other information, either required as part of the Concept Plan review or as the Planning and Zoning Board, Community Development Department or City Council shall find necessary to a full consideration of the entire proposed PUD or any stage thereof. 6. Zoning Enactment: A rezoningparcel of land to PUD shall not become effective until such time as whieh shall take laeee at the time the City Gott ei appr-oves the PUD Pr-eli ,;nat-, Pla .specified in 1007.015 (h). 6 7. A complete application for PUD Final Plan shall be submitted no later than one (1) year after the date of approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan, or a time as provided in the developer's agreement. Otherwise, the PUD Preliminary Plan approval shall be considered void, unless an extension, requested in writing and for good cause, is granted by the City Council. The City Council may approve such an extension after the deadline date passes. (e) PUD Final Plan Application. 1. The PUD Final Plan is to serve as a complete, and permanent public record of a specific stage or phase of the PUD Preliminary Plan and the manner in which that stage is to be developed. It shall incorporate all prior approved plans and all approved modifications thereof resulting from the PUD process. It shall serve in conjunction with other provisions of the City Code as the land use regulation applicable to the PUD. 2. Upon approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan and within the time established, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Department an application and PUD Final Plan consisting of the information and submissions required by this Code for the entire PUD or for one (1) or more stages. The PUD Final Plan shall conform to the PUD Preliminary Plan in all respects, and shall be integrated as a coherent statement of the entire Plan. Appropriate cross-referencing and incorporation of recorded documents may be utilized. 3. After review of a PUD Concept Plan and approval of a PUD Preliminary Plan, the applicant will submit the following material for review by the City staff prior to issuance of a building permit: 2-45 a. A revised PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat of the entire PUD incorporating all changes and conditions that were required. This revised preliminary plat will provide the historical record of the subdivision approval by which subsequent final plats shall be considered. b. Information for Final Plat as 'ordinance. specified in § 1001.056 of this c. Final architectural elevations, in color, of all principal and accessory buildings and structures (type, color, and materials used in all exterior surfaces). Typical floor plan and typical room plan drawn to scale with a summary of square footage by use or activity. d. Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, drainage, utilities and other public improvements e. Any other plans, agreements, or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. 4. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Final Plan and Final Plat submission to the City Council for their consideration at a regularly scheduled meeting. 5. The terms of the PUD as approved by the City Council shall be embodied in a Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement, and such other documents as the City shall deem necessary or desirable. The Development and PUD Agreement and any appropriate resolution of the City Council shall be filed with the Anoka County Recorder at the expense of the applicant. At the election of the City, filing of the PUD Preliminary Plan may be delayed until the PUD Final Plan is filed. Where the PUD Preliminary Plan is denied, Council action shall be by written resolution setting forth its findings and conclusions in support of its action. a. Within one (1) year after the approval of a PUD Final Plan, construction shall commence in accordance with such approved plan. Failure to commence construction within such period shall automatically render void, all approvals of the PUD plan unless an extension, requested in writing, is granted by the City Council. The City Council may approve such an extension after the deadline date passes. In such case the area encompassed within the PUD shall thereafter be subject to those provisions of the Zoning Code, and other Code provisions, applicable in the district in which it is located. (f) Plan Modification/Amendment of a Planned Unit Development. 1. Plan modifications/amendments qualifying as minor may be approved by the Community Development Director provided the changes do not involve the following: a. Increase in floor area of structure or number of dwelling units. b. Change in exterior building material. 2-46 c. Alteration of any condition attached or modification to the PUD Final Plan made by the City Council. 2. Substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the PUD and shall follow the same review procedure as a PUD Preliminary Plan. 2-47 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-48 § 1007.025 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. (1) When an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW), alternative urban areawide review (AUAR), or environmental impact statement (EIS,) is required or otherwise ordered or submitted, the applicable review procedures shall be as set forth in the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board regulations for the Environmental Review Program, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes and specified in Minnesota Rules 4410. (2) An EAW, AUAR, or EIS application, together with the completed data portions of the environmental document, shall be accompanied by a fee and cash escrow as set forth in ordinance4ese4gion. Costs of City time and materials expended in reviewing and processing the agpplication shall be charged against the cash escrow account and credited to the City. If, at any time, the balance in the cash escrow account is depleted to less than 10% of the originally _ required cash escrow amount, the project proposer shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Any balance remaining in the cash escrow account upon completion of the process shall be returned to the project proposer after all claims and charges thereto have been deducted. (3) Upon completion of the environmental document for distribution and the start of the comment period, the Zoning Administrator shall provide mailed notice of the availability of the environmental document and date of the meeting at which the Environmental Board will consideraccept oral comments on the matter, to all property owners within 600 feet of the boundaries of the property that is the subject of the environmental document. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days before the Environmental Board meeting. Failure of a property owner to receive notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth in this Chapter. (4) Following the required comment period, the City shall prepare the final document with a response to comments. The Environmental Board shall review the final document and provide its recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act on the document as required by Minnesota Rules 4410. 2-49 ADMINISTRATION § 1007.015 AMENDMENTS: TEXT AND MAP. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to prescribe the procedure and requirements for any change to the zoning classification, text or zoning boundaries of a property or any amendment to any provision of this chapter. (2) Initiation. Amendments may be initiated by action of the City Council, recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board, or by petition of a property owner. (3) Submittal Requirements. (a) Petitions for text amendments shall include detailed written and graphic materials fully explaining the proposed change. (b) Petitions for map amendments shall include, as determined by the Community Development Director, either site and building plans consistent with the requirements established in § 1007.020 (Site and Building Plan Review) or information required by Chapter 1000 of the City Code for a plat submittal. (4) Procedure. An application for zoning (text or map) amendment shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in § 1007.000 (9) of this ordinance. The request for the amendment shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. (b) The City shall set the date for a public hearing and have notice of such hearing published in the legal newspaper at least 10 days prior to said hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. (c) The City shall mail notice of the public hearing to all property owners within 600 feet of any property proposed for zoning text or map amendments. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days prior to the day of the public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. Failure of any property owner to receive the mailed notification shall not invalidate the proceedings. (d) The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. 2-1 (e) The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: of the area. 1. The proposed action is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed action is or will be compatible with present and future land uses 3. The proposed action conforms with all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed action is within capabilities of streets serving the property as described in § 1007.020(4)(d). (f) The Planning and Zoning Board shall make findings of fact and recommend approval or denial of the request. Such recommendation shall be accompanied by the report and recommendation of the City staff. (g) Approval of a proposed amendment shall require passage by a majority vote of all members of the City Council except that the adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial requires a four -fifths (4/5) majority vote of all members of the City Council. If the City Council denies a request, it shall state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request. (h) An amendment to this chapter, adopted by the City Council, shall take effect 30 days after its publication or at such later date as it specifies. (i) No application for a zoning text or map amendment which has been denied shall be resubmitted for a period of 12 months from the date of said order of denial. 2-2 § 1007.016 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow the City to review uses, which because of their unique characteristics, cannot be permitted as of right in a particular zoning district, but which may be allowed upon showing that such use in a specified location will comply with all of the conditions and standards of this zoning ordinance. When such circumstances exist, a conditional use permit may be granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit and an annual review of the permit may be required. The permit shall be granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. Conditional use permits may be granted in accordance with this subdivision for any use or purpose for which such permits are required or permitted by this ordinance or as listed as a conditional use for the zoning districts provided in § 1007.080 through § 1007.132 of this ordinance. (2) Submittal Requirements. The applicant shall include as part of the application, the submittal information as identified in § 1007.020 (Site and Building Plan Review). (3) Procedure. An application for a conditional use permit shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in § 1007.000 (9) of this ordinance. The request for conditional use permit shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning & Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. (b) The City shall set the date for a public hearing and have notice of such hearing published in the legal newspaper at least 10 days prior to said hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. (c) The City shall mail notice of the public hearing to all property owners within 350 feet of the property in question. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days prior to the day of the public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. Failure of any property owner to receive the mailed notification shall not invalidate the proceedings. (d) The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. (e) The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the design standards listed in § 1007.020 (4) of this ordinance. 2-3 2. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 3. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. (f) The Planning and Zoning Board shall make findings of fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request as they deem necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Chapter. Such recommendation shall be made in writing and accompanied by the report and recommendation of City staff. (g) Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board and the City staff, the City Council shall make a recorded finding of fact and may impose any condition they consider necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. (h) Following approval of the conditional use permit, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Title. (i) Expiration. Unless the City Council specifically approves a different time when action is officially taken on the request, conditional use permits which have been issued under the provisions of this chapter shall expire, unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year of the date the conditional use permit is issued; or, unless before the expiration of the one year period; the applicant shall apply for an extension thereof by completing and submitting a request for extension. The request for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the conditional use permit. A request for an extension not exceeding one year shall be subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Should a second extension of time or any extension of time longer than one year be requested by the applicant, it shall be presented to the planning commission for a recommendation and to the City Council for a decision. A conditional use specified in the permit expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one (1) year. 0) If a periodic review is included as a condition by which a conditional use permit is granted, the conditional use permit may be reviewed at a public hearing with notice of said hearing published at least 10 days prior to the review; it shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to schedule such public hearings and the owner of land having a conditional use permit shall not be required to pay a fee for said review. (k) Any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the conditional use permit issued shall require an amended conditional use permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being issued. An amended conditional use permit application and requests for changes in conditions shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a conditional use permit. (1) All uses existing as of July 14, 1997 that are included in the list of conditional uses for the zoning district in which they are located shall be considered as having a conditional use permit which contains conditions that permit the land use and structures as they existed on said 2-4 date. Any enlargement, structural alteration, or intensification of such use shall require an amended conditional use permit as provided for above. (m) No application for a conditional use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of said order of denial. (4) Revocation. If an approved conditional use permit is in violation of this ordinance or the conditions of permit approval, the City may initiate a process to revoke the conditional use permit. The City shall then conduct a public hearing to consider the revocation of a conditional use permit. Notifications shall be distributed and published according to paragraph (3)(b) and (c) The public hearing shall be conducted by the Planning & Zoning Board, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council. In considering revocation, the Board and the City Council shall consider compliance with the approved conditions of the conditional use permit and the standards listed in paragraph (3)(e). The City may also conduct a public hearing and consider revocation if the time requirements of paragraph (3)(i) have not been met. (5) Following a vote by the City Council to revoke the conditional use permit, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Title. 2-5 § 1007.017 INTERIM USE PERMITS. (1) Purpose. The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses is: (a) To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is obtained or while the permanent location is under construction. (b) To allow a use that is presently judged acceptable by the City Council, but that with anticipated development or redevelopment, will not be acceptable in the future or will be replaced in the future by a permitted or conditional use allowed within the respective district. (c) To allow a use which is reflective of anticipated long range change to an area and which is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan provided that said use maintains harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and is in keeping with the architectural character and design standards of existing uses and development. (2) Procedure. (a) Uses defined as "interim uses" shall be processed according to the standards and procedures for a conditional use permit as established by § 1007.016 of this ordinance. (b) General Standards. An interim use shall comply with the following: ordinance. 1. Meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in § 1007.016 of this 2. Conforms to the applicable performance standards of this ordinance. 3. The use is allowed in an interim use in the respective zoning district. 4. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. 5. The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. 6. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deem appropriate for permission of the use. (3) Termination. An interim use shall terminate on the happening of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: (a) The date stated in the permit. (b) Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued. (c) Upon change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the use non -conforming. Mel (d) The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning district. (4) Revocation. If an approved interim use permit is in violation of this ordinance or the conditions of permit approval, the City may initiate a process to revoke the interim use permit. The City shall then conduct a public hearing to consider the revocation of an interim use permit. Notifications shall be distributed and published according to paragraph (2). The public hearing shall be conducted by the Planning & Zoning Board, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council. In considering revocation, the Board and the City Council shall consider compliance with the approved conditions of the interim use permit and the standards listed in paragraph (2)(b). 2-7 § 1007.018 VARIANCES AND APPEALS. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for deviations from the requirements of this Chapter, and to provide for the appeal of an interpretation of legislative intent of the provisions of this chapter. (2) Board Designation. The City Council shall serve as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. (3) Variances. Variances from the requirements of this ordinance, including restrictions placed on nonconformities, may be granted under the following conditions: (a) Criteria and Findings of Fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs 1. through 6. or unless paragraph 7. applies. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. ordinance. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. 7. In accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statute 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. (b) Submittal Requirements. Applications for variances shall be filed with the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the following submittal information: 1. Proof of title and contract/purchase agreement and/or property owner signature on the application form when applicable. 2. Certificate of survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor in compliance with the requirements in 1007.020(2)(b) of the ordinance. The Community Development Department may waive the certificate of survey when the survey will not provide information relevant to the variance necessary to review the application. 3. Graphic information, plans, specifications, or other materials that illustrate the requested variance. 4. Narrative description of how the application complies with the variance criteria listed below. (c) Procedures. An application for a variance shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements for variances are as follows: 1. The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in § 1007.000 (9) of this ordinance. 2. The request for variance shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation of the action to the City Council. 4. The petitioner or representative may appear before the Planning and Zoning Board in order to present information or to answer questions. The Board shall make a recommendation to the City Council including findings on compliance with required criteria and conditions to be imposed. 5. The City Council may grant the variance if it has been established that the application complies with the required criteria. The City shall decide upon requests for variance by approving or denying the same in part or in whole. 6. The City may impose conditions in the granting of variances. Conditions must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. 7. The City Council shall, on all variance applications whether granted or denied, record findings of fact. Such findings shall be recorded in writing and shall state the City Council's reasons for such action. If the City Council denies an application, it shall state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the application. However, when a vote on a resolution or properly made motion to approve an application fails for any reason, the failure shall constitute a denial of the application provided that those voting against the motion state on the record the reasons why they oppose the application. 8. Following approval of the variance, the City shall file a certified copy thereof including a legal description of the property with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 2-9 (4) Appeal. An appeal shall only be applicable to an administrative permit, order, requirement or interpretation of intent of provisions of this ordinance. Opinions and evaluations as they pertain to the impact or result of a request are not subject to the appeal procedure. (a) Procedure. An appeal from an administrative action shall be filed by the property owner or their agent with the Zoning Administrator within 10 days after the making of the order, requirement, or interpretation being appealed. 1. The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator an application for appeal stating the specific grounds upon which the appeal is made. Said application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by City Council ordinance. In cases where the application is judged to be incomplete, the Zoning Administrator shall notify the applicant, in writing, within 10 days of the date of submission. 2. An appeal stays all proceedings and the furtherance of the action being appealed unless it is certified to the Board of Adjustment Appeals, after the notice of appeal is filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would cause imminent peril to life and property. 3. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports when appropriate and shall provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the action to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 4. The Board of Appeals and Adjustment shall consider the application for appeal at a public meeting and consider testimony of the property owner and City staff. 5. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall make its decision within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. 6. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the Board upon the applicant by mail. 2-10 § 1007.019 ADMINISTRATION: ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS AND APPROVALS. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish regulations and procedures for the processing and consideration of activities allowed by administrative permit, and of matters requiring the approvals of the Zoning Administrator with the goal of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. (2) Submittal Requirements. The information required for all administrative permit or approval applications shall include: (a) The applicant shall include as part of the application, the applicable submission information as identified in § 1007.020 Site and Building Plan Review. The Zoning Administrator may waive submission information not deemed necessary for the administrative review. (b) A concise statement describing the proposed use, event or activity, including the purpose, type of merchandise involved, dates and times of operation, number of employees involved, provisions for on -site security, provisions for on -site parking, and other pertinent information required by the Zoning Administrator to fully evaluate the application. (3) Procedure. An application for administrative permit shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in § 1007.000(9) of this ordinance. (b) The Zoning Administrator shall review the applications and related materials and shall determine whether the proposal is in compliance with all applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and applicable performance standards set forth in this Ordinance. (c) A written report or letter of approval shall be issued to the applicant when a determination of compliance has been made. Specific conditions to assure compliance with applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and the standards of this ordinance shall be attached to the permit or letter. (d) Determination of non-compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and the standards in this paragraph shall be communicated to the applicant in writing and the application for the permit shall be considered denied; unless, within 10 days of the date of such notice, the applicant submits revised plans and/or information with which the Zoning Administrator is able to determine compliance. (e) Unresolved disputes as to administrative application of the requirements of this paragraph shall be subject to appeal as outlined in § 1007.018 of this ordinance. 2-11 (4) Standards. All uses, events, or activities allowed by administrative permit shall conform to the applicable standards outlined in the zoning district in which such use, event or activity is proposed. (5) Administration and Enforcement. (a) The Zoning Administrator shall keep a record of applications and administrative permits or approvals. (b) A copy of all administrative permits issued shall be forwarded to appropriate staff as determined by the Zoning Administrator. (c) Enforcement of the provisions of this paragraph shall be in accordance with § 1007.023 of this ordinance. Violation of an issued permit or of the provisions of this section also shall be grounds for denial of future permit applications. 2-12 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-13 § 1007.020 SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish Site Plan Review procedures and provides regulations pertaining to the enforcement of site design standards consistent with the requirements of this chapter. All site and building plans for multiple family, commercial, industrial or public/semi-public uses shall require review and approval by the Community Development Department. Relocated structures shall also require a site and building plan review as required by § 1007.046. (2) Submittal Requirements. Applications for site and building plan review shall include the following submittal information: (a) Proof of title and contract/purchase agreement and property owner signature on the application form when applicable. feet. (b) Certificate of Survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor identifying the following: Scale (engineering only) at not less than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) 2. North point indication. 3. Existing boundaries with lot dimension and lot area. 4. Existing buildings, structures and improvements. 5. Easements of record 6. Delineated wetland boundary, to include the OHWL of any lakes or DNR waters. 7. All encroachments. 8. Legal description. (c) Site Plan using the current Certificate of Survey as a base depicting the following: 1. Name of project or development. 2. Name and address of developer and/or owner. 3. Name and address of engineer/architect/designer. 4. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. 5. All proposed improvements, including: a. Required and proposed setbacks. 2-14 b. Location, setback and dimensions of all proposed buildings and structures. c. Location of all adjacent buildings and structures within one hundred (100) feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. d. Location, number, dimensions of all proposed parking stalls, loading areas and drive aisles, with curbing shown. e. Location, width and setbacks of all proposed street accesses and driveways. f. Location, width and setbacks of all proposed sidewalks, walkways and trails. g. Location and type of all proposed lighting, including fixture details. h. Provisions for storage and disposal of waste, garbage and recyclables, including details for enclosing and screening exterior containers. 6. Calculations for impervious/pervious surfaces. (d) Grading Plan (using the current Certificate of Survey as a base) depicting the following: 1. Existing contours at two- (2) foot intervals. 2. Proposed grade elevations at two- (2) foot maximum intervals. 3. Drainage plan, including the configuration of drainage areas and calculations. 4. Spot elevations. 5. Surface water ponding and treatment areas. 6. Erosion control measures. 7. Wetland replacement plan (when applicable). 8. Soil borings. 9. Drainage calculations for 2-, 10-, & 100-year storm events. 10. Delineated wetland boundary, to include OHWL of any lakes or DNR waters. 11. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. (e) Landscaping Plan using the current Certificate of Survey as a base depicting the following: 1. Planting schedule including: 2-15 a. Symbols. b. Quantities. c. Common and botanical names. d. Sizes of plant materials. e. Root specification (bare root, balled/burlapped, potted, etc.). f. Special installation instructions. 2. Tree Preservation Plan: location, type and size of all significant trees to be removed or preserved. (see tree plan requirements in § 1007.043 (17)(d)) 3. Planting detail (show all species to scale at normal mature crown diameter or spread for local hardiness zone). 4. Typical sections with details of fences, tie walls, planter boxes, tot lots, picnic areas and the like. 5. Typical sections with details of landscape islands, planter beds, and foundation plantings with identification of materials to be used. 6. Delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with respective areas measured in square feet. 7. Coverage plan for underground irrigation systems, if any. 8. Other existing or proposed conditions that could be anticipated to affect landscaping. 9. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. (f) Photometric Lighting Plan, to include fixture details/cut sheets/drawings. 1. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. (g) Architectural Plans. 1. Date of plan preparation and dates of any subsequent revisions. 2. Architectural elevations, in color, of all principal and accessory buildings and structures (type, color, and materials used in all exterior surfaces). 3. Typical floor plan and typical room plan drawn to scale with a summary of square footage by use or activity. 2-16 (h) Utility Plan. Location of hydrants, valves and manholes, if any. 2. Location, sizing, and type of water and sewer system mains and proposed service connections, hydrants, valves, and manholes; or, 3. Location and size of proposed primary and secondary on -site treatment systems, when allowed. 4. Storm sewer, catch basins, invert elevation, type of castings and type of materials (refer to Engineering Manual for City standards). Date of plan preparations and dates of any subsequent revisions. (i) Other plans and information as may be required by the Zoning Administrator which may include (but not be limited to) the following: Location, type and size (area and height) of all signs to be erected upon the subject property. 2. Vicinity map showing the subject property in relation to nearby highways or major street intersections. 3. Sound source control plan. 4. Fire protection plan. Proposed protective covenants or private restrictions. 6. Where landscaping or man-made materials are used to provide screening from adjacent properties, a cross section shall be provided showing the perspective of the site from neighboring properties at the property line elevation. 0) For applications for new communication towers, the application must include information to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of § 1007.054, including but not limited to: 1. Demonstration that a significant gap in coverage exists that would be resolved by the proposed location and that adequate service cannot be provided utilizing existing structures within a two (2) mile search radius of the proposed site. 2. Structural design information to ensure compliance with manufacturer specifications and to ensure the tower can accommodate additional antennas (co -location). 3. Authorization from the property owner if different from applicant. 2-17 use. 4. Lease or agreement requiring removal of the tower and facilities after cessation of 5. Copies of applicable federal, state, and local licenses, permits, approvals. (3) Procedure. An application for site and building plan review shall be approved or denied within 60 days of the date of its official complete submission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99 unless extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. Additional City requirements for site and building plan review are as follows: (a) The property owner or their agent shall file with the Zoning Administrator a completed application form together with the required submittals and a fee as required in § 1007.000 (9) of this ordinance. (b) The Zoning Administrator shall forward copies of the application and site and building plans to the appropriate staff, consultants and governmental agencies for review and recommendation. The Community Development Department shall perform a review and approve or deny the application. The Community Development Department may also suggest such conditions as they deem necessary to the approval of the site and building plans. (c) The applicant may appeal any denial or decision by the Department according to § 1007.018. (d) No application for a site and building plan review shall be resubmitted for a period of 12 months from the date of said order of denial. (e) The Community Development Department shall provide to the City Council reports summarizing submitted site and building plan applications and outcomes regarding approval or denial as they occur. (4) Performance Standards. Plans which fail to meet the following criteria shall not be approved. (a) The proposed development application must be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. (b) The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. (c) The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. (d) Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed development is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed development will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. 2-18 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed development is C, traffic generated by a proposed development will not degrade the level of service below C. 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed development is D, traffic generated by a proposed development will not degrade the level of service below D. 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the proposed development. If the existing level of service is E or F, the developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the proposed development must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6. The traffic generated from a proposed development shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 7. The LOS requirements in paragraphs L to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the proposed development project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. (e) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. (f) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate or safe sanitary sewer system. (g) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. (h) Fire prevention and fighting equipment acceptable to the Board of Fire Underwriters and City Council shall be readily available when any activity involving the handling or storage of flammable or explosive materials is carried on. (5) Expiration. Activities authorized by site and building plan approval shall be initiated within six (6) months. The time limits established in this paragraph may be extended by the Zoning Administrator. (6) Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Financial Guarantee. Following the approval of the site plan required by this title where no public improvements are proposed and 2-19 before issuance of a building permit, the applicant, as determined to be necessary by the Zoning Administrator, shall guarantee to the City the completion of all improvements as shown on the approved site plan and as required by the site plan approval. This guarantee shall be made by means of a site improvement performance agreement and a financial guarantee as provided below: (a) The applicant shall execute the site improvement performance agreement on forms provided by the City. The agreement shall be approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and shall define the required work and reflect the terms of this chapter as to the required guarantee for the performance of the work by the applicant. (b) The required work includes, but is not limited to private exterior amenities such as landscaping, private driveways, parking areas, recreation fields, drainage systems, stormwater basins, sanitary sewer systems, water mains, wetland mitigation, wetland buffers, erosion control, curbing, fences and screening, and other similar facilities. The required work shall also include all aspects of a tree preservation plan, if applicable. (c) A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the executed site performance agreement as provided herein: 1. Financial guarantees acceptable to the City include cash escrow; an irrevocable letter of credit; or other financial instruments which provide equivalent assurance to the City and which are approved by the Zoning Administrator. 2. The term of the financial guarantee shall be for the life of the site improvement performance agreement, and it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that a submitted financial guarantee shall continue in full force and effect until the Zoning Administrator shall have approved and accepted all of the work undertaken to be done and shall thereby have released the guarantee or reduced the amount of the guarantee as provided in this chapter. 3. When any instrument submitted as a financial guarantee contains a provision for an automatic expiration date, after which the instrument may not be drawn upon, notwithstanding the status of the site performance agreement or of the required work, the expiration date shall be October 31; further, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to notify the City in writing, by certified mail, at least 60 days in advance of the expiration date of the intention to renew the instrument or to not renew the instrument. If the instrument is to be renewed, a written notice of extension shall be provided 30 days prior to the expiration date; if the instrument is not to be renewed, and has not been released by the Zoning Administrator, another acceptable financial guarantee in the appropriate amount shall be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expiration. The term of any extension shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Upon receipt of an acceptable substitute financial guarantee, the Zoning Administrator may release the original guarantee. 4. The amount of the financial guarantee shall be established by the Zoning Administrator based upon an itemized estimate of the cost of all required work as provided by the applicant. A cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be in the amount of 35% for private improvements and 125% for public improvements of the approved estimated cost. The amount of any other approved financial instrument shall be determined by the Zoning Administrator. 2-20 5. At the option of the City, the applicant may submit a separate financial guarantee for that portion of the required work consisting solely of landscaping improvements with another financial guarantee for all other exterior amenities and improvements which comprise the work. All trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for 12 months from the time of planting. Any subsequent replacement shall be warranted for 12 months from the time of planting. (d) The time allowed for completion of the required improvements shall be set out in the site improvement performance agreement. The agreement and the financial guarantee shall provide for forfeiture to the City to cure a default or reimburse the City the cost of enforcement measures. As various portions of such required work are completed by the applicant, are in compliance with City requirements, and are approved by the City, the Zoning Administrator may release such portion of the financial guarantee as is attributable to such completed work. Landscaping improvements shall not be deemed complete until the City has verified survivability of all required plantings through one "winter season" which is defined for the purpose of this section as the period October 31 through April 30. (e) The applicant shall notify the Zoning Administrator in writing when all or a portion of the required improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plan and may be inspected. Upon receipt of such notice, the Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for the inspection of the improvements to determine that the useful life of all work performed meets the standards for the particular industry, profession, or material used in the performance of the work. Any required work failing to meet such standards shall not be deemed to be complete and the applicant shall be notified in writing as to required corrections. Upon determination that the work has been completed, including the winter season survivability of all landscape improvements, a notice of the date of actual completion shall be given to the applicant and appropriate action, to release or to reduce the amount of the financial guarantee shall be taken by the Zoning Administrator. 2-21 § 1007.021 DUTIES OF CITY STAFF. The offices of the Zoning Administrator and Building Official are hereby established; official(s) shall be appointed by the government body and serve at its pleasure. (1) Duties of the Zoning Administrator. The Community Development Director or designee shall be the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance as provided herein; in addition to the duties and powers of the Zoning Administrator under this ordinance, express or implied, the Zoning Administrator shall have the duty and power to: (a) Issue permits required by this ordinance. (b) Maintain all records necessary for the enforcement of this ordinance; including, but not limited to, all data, maps, amendments, rezonings, and conditional use permits, variances, appeal notices, certificates of occupancy, and applications thereof, nonconforming uses. (c) Receive, file and forward all appeals, notices, applications for variances, conditional use permits, certificates of occupancy, or other matters to the appropriate officials or boards. (d) Serve as ex-officio, non -voting member of the Planning and Zoning Board. (e) Perform all duties set forth in job description. (2) Duties of the Building Official. The Building Official shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance as provided herein; in addition to the duties and powers of the Building Official under this ordinance, express or implied, the Building Official shall have the duty and power to: (a) Conduct inspections of land, buildings or structures at reasonable times, to determine compliance with and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. (b) Perform annual and/or periodic review of all conditional use permits. (c) Institute in the name of the City any appropriate actions or proceedings to enforce this ordinance. (d) Perform all duties set forth in job description. 2-22 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-23 § 1007.022 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (1) No person may change the use of any land except for construction of essential services and transmission lines or occupy or utilize a new structurally altered building (except single-family detached dwellings or their accessory buildings or private garages in any district) or change the use of any building after the effective date of this ordinance unless he has first obtained a certificate of occupancy. (2) Application for a certificate of occupancy for a new building or for an existing building which has been so altered or the reuse of any land may be filed with the Building Official any time after the application for a building permit. The Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued within 10 days after the construction or alteration of such building or part thereof or site has been completed in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance and building code. Pending the issuance of said certificate, a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued, subject to the provisions of the building code and zoning ordinance for a period not to exceed 12 months during the completion of the erection or the alteration of such a building. The temporary certificate shall not be construed as in any way altering the respective rights, duties or obligations of the owners or of the community relating to the use or occupancy of the premises or any other matter, except under such restrictions and provisions as will adequately ensure the safety of the occupants. The use of any structure for which a building permit is required or the use of any land shall be considered a violation of this ordinance unless a certificate of occupancy has been issued. (3) Application for a certificate of occupancy for a new use of land shall be made to the Building Official before any such land shall be so used. Such certificate of occupancy shall be issued within 10 days after this application if the use is in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. (4) A record of all certificates of occupancy shall be kept on file with the City. 2-24 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-25 § 1007.023 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES. (1) Administration and Enforcement. (a) This ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Administrator who is appointed by the City Council. The Zoning Administrator may institute in the name of the City of Lino Lakes any appropriate actions or proceedings against a violator as provided by statute, ordinance, or code. (b) If the provisions of this ordinance are being violated, the City shall notify, in writing, the person responsible for such violations, indicating the nature of the violation and ordering the action necessary to correct it. The City shall order discontinuance of illegal use of land, buildings or structures; removal of illegal buildings or structures or of additions, alterations or structural changes thereto; discontinuance of any illegal work being done; or shall take any other action authorized by this Section to ensure compliance with or to prevent violation of its provisions. (2) Penalties, Violations, and Enforcement. In addition to the remedies set out in the paragraph above, the City may enforce any provisions of this Ordinance by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. 2-26 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-27 § 1007.024 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD). (1) Purpose. The purpose of the PUD zoning district is to provide a district that grants flexibility from certain zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. It is further intended that PUDs are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, a higher level of urban amenities, preservation of natural open space, and more economical efficient use of land. (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. (c) The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. (d) A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. (e) An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. (f) A mix of land use types. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (3) All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit in all zoning districts shall be potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the City's Comprehensive Plan. (4) The standards outlined in the following City Code Sections serve as development guidelines within PUDs: Table 1 PUD Land Use Development Standards Low -Density Residential R-1, §1007.090 R-1 X, § 1007.091 R-2, § 1007.093 2-28 Low -Density Mixed Residential R-1, § 1007.090 R-2, § 1007.093 Medium -Density Residential R-2, § 1007.093 R-3, § 1007.094 High -Density Residential R-4, § 1007.095 R-6, § 1007.096 Planned Residential / Commercial R-4, § 1007.095 NB, § 1007.110 LB, § 1007.111 Office Residential R-2, § 1007.093 R-3, § 1007.094 NB, § 1007.110 LB, § 1007.111 GB, § 1007.112 Signature Gateway R-3, § 1007.094 R-4, § 1007.095 NB, § 1007.110 GB, § 1007.112 Commercial NB, § 1007.110 LB, § 1007.111 GB, § 1007.112 Town Center R-4, § 1007.095 GB, § 1007.112 Business Campus GB, § 1007.112 LI, § 1007.121 Industrial LI, § 1007.121 GI, § 1007.122 (a) The lot and yard standards, impervious surface coverage, building requirements and height regulations of the closest conventional zoning district shall be used as the regulations, but may be departed from to accomplish the purposes described in § 1007.024(2) of this ordinance. (b) The standards outlined in the General Provisions section of the Zoning Ordinance serve as guidelines, but may be departed from to accomplish the purposes described in § 1007.024(2) of this ordinance. (c) The aforementioned are guidelines only and not development standards. (5) General Requirements for a Planned Unit Development (PUD). (a) Public or common open space at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements established in this ordinance and such complementary structures and improvements as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the PUD shall be provided within the area of the PUD. (b) If a PUD includes provision of affordable housing, a specific housing type, or target housing price, details associated with the housing - including number of units, unit size, and price 2-29 - shall be documented in a legally binding agreement approved by the City and recorded against the properties within the PUD. (c) If a PUD includes preservation of natural habitat, those habitats shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement approved by the City and recorded against the properties within the PUD. (d) A common or homeowner's association shall be established where appropriate to ensure on -going maintenance of infrastructure and public spaces, required restoration and management of natural areas, or other actions and activities specific to the PUD. (e) A residential PUD may include a variety of residential dwelling units, including, but not limited to single family and multifamily units as long as it complies with the density requirements. A non-residential PUD may include a variety of commercial and/or industrial uses. A PUD may also include a mix of residential and non-residential uses. (f) Recreational open space or trail corridors intended as public parks or public trails shall be dedicated to the City or granted through an easement. Management and maintenance of the public recreational areas shall be the responsibility of the City. (g) Street, Private. 1. Private streets within the project shall have an improved surface to twenty-six (26) feet or more in width and shall be so designed as to permit the City emergency vehicles to provide protection to each building. 2. No portion of the required private street system shall be used in calculating required off-street parking space or be used for parking. (h) As part of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat approval, a Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant, builder, or developer shall execute the Agreement. The Agreement shall detail all use restrictions and required on and off -site improvements conditional to the PUD rezoning. (6) Urban Residential Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) Urban residential PUDs shall be applied only to residential Zoning Districts served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. (b) The maximum allowable density within an urban residential PUD shall be consistent with the density directives of the Comprehensive Plan. (c) Open Space Performance Standards. 1. A minimum of 50% of the gross land area shall be reserved as common open space for Townhomes. 2-30 2. Each open space lot or outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or trail corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification, as specified in § 1001.099 of the Lino Lakes Subdivision ordinance. 3. Common open space shall provide a unified landscape for the use and enjoyment of the neighborhood community and/or the general public. 4. Open space shall be exclusive of unit lots and driveways. Street rights -of -way, parking lots, and driveways shall be designed to maximize tree preservation, natural habitat, and wetland protection. 5. All open space shall be platted as lots or outlots held as open space in perpetuity. Outlots designated as Public trail corridors shall be conveyed by fee title or by easement. (d) Neighborhood Performance Standards. 1. To provide an identity and create a cohesive development pattern, residential units/buildings shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which they have in common. Such identity may be accomplished by one or more of the following features: a. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that a majority of the principal structures take visual advantage of a field, wetland, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that a majority of the principal structure will take visual advantage of a green, playground, ball field, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. c. The neighborhood lots may be arranged such that the principal structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, landscaped medians, sidewalks, trails, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. (e) Yards. 1. The front, rear and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the PUD site shall be the same as imposed in the respective base districts. 2. Buildings shall maintain a minimum separation of 10 feet. (7) Commercial or Industrial Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) Commercial or Industrial PUDs shall be applied only to commercial or industrial zoning districts served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. (b) Open Space Performance Standards. 2-31 1. The PUD design shall result in greater landscaped pervious area than the base zoning district standard. 2. The PUD site design shall result in the protection of important natural features (e.g., wetlands, significant trees, water courses, slopes over 12%). 3. The PUD design shall include extensive landscaping with an emphasis on streetscape, site entrances, and the perimeter of the building. (c) Commercial and industrial buildings shall comply with design standards of § 1007.043(2)(d) of this ordinance. A PUD shall consist of a harmonious arrangement and selection of land uses in groupings of buildings that are planned and designed as an integrated unit. The integrated design shall include elements such as building orientation and materials, utilities, parking areas, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and open spaces. (8) Mixed Residential, Commercial and/or Industrial Planned Unit Development Requirements. (a) PUD's including a mix of residential, commercial, and/or industrial uses shall follow the applicable provisions of (6) and (7) above. (9) Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development. (a) Prior to submitting a PUD application, the property owner/applicant shall meet with the Community Development Department to generally describe the proposed PUD. The primary purpose of the conference is to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of the proposal and its conformity to the provisions of this ordinance before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. (b) Prior to submitting a PUD Concept Plan application, the property owner/applicant shall hold a neighborhood meeting for informal comment and feedback. (c) PUD Concept Plan Application. 1. The PUD Concept Plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development before incurring substantial cost. The evaluation of the Concept Plan shall include but not be limited to the following criteria: a. Overall maximum PUD density range. b. General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. c. General location and extent of public and common open space. d. General location of residential and non-residential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. 2-32 e. A staging and time schedule of development. f. Other special criteria for development. 2. PUD Concept Plan Submission Information. a. Information for Concept Plan as specified in § 1001.026 of this ordinance. b. An aerial photograph at a scale of not less than one (1) inch equals 100 feet, depicting the proposed development of the subject property and all land within 500 feet and showing the precise location of existing streets. c. Schematic drawing of the proposed PUD including, but not limited to, the general location of major street and pedestrian ways, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. d. An estimate of the total number of dwelling and/or other units and a tabulation of the following land uses expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area: i. Area devoted to residential and non-residential uses. ii. Area devoted to residential use by building or structure or use type. iii. Area devoted to common open space. iv. Area devoted to public open space. v. Area devoted to streets. vi. Area, and potential floor area, devoted to commercial uses. vii. Area, and potential floor area, devoted to industrial or office uses. e. If the PUD will be developed in different phases, the applicant shall submit a phasing plan for construction of the various elements of the entire PUD. f. If the PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. g. Minutes from the required neighborhood meeting. 3. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Concept Plan submission to the City's advisory boards and City Council for their informal review and comment on the project's consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations at regularly scheduled meetings. 2-33 (d) PUD Preliminary Plan Application 1. The purpose of the PUD Preliminary Plan is to provide a master plan of the entire development upon which the Planning and Zoning Board will base its recommendation to the City Council. The PUD Preliminary Plan serves as a complete and permanent public record of the entire PUD and the manner in which it is to be developed. 2. Following review of the PUD Concept Plan, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Department a PUD Preliminary Plan, rezoning and preliminary plat applications. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall refine the PUD Concept Plan. 3. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Preliminary Plan submission to the City's advisory boards and City Council for their consideration at regularly scheduled meetings where the related rezoning and preliminary plat applications are being considered. 4. The evaluation of the proposed PUD Preliminary Plan shall include but not be limited to the following criteria: a. The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto public rights -of -way does not create congestion or dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project residents and the general public. b. A sufficient amount of useable open space is provided. c. The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. d. The development is in compliance with the requirements of the Lino Lakes City Code except where modified by the PUD. ordinance. The PUD Preliminary Plan submission shall include but not be limited to: a. Information for Site and Building Review as specified in § 1007.020 of this b. Information for Preliminary Plat as specified in § 1001.041 of this ordinance. c. Location, designation and total area of all common open space. d. Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. e. A tabulation of all land uses expressed in square footage and as a percent of the total project area. f. Identification of existing natural resource areas and the proposed method for protection and restoration of these areas. 2-34 g. A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD, the market which it is intended to serve, its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how it is to be designed, arranged and operated. h. Where deemed necessary, a market feasibility study including an analysis of the proposals economic impact on the City. i. A statement summarizing all changes which have been made in any document, plan data or information previously submitted, together with revised copies of any such document, plan or data. j. Such other information, either required as part of the Concept Plan review or as the Planning and Zoning Board, Community Development Department or City Council shall find necessary to a full consideration of the entire proposed PUD or any stage thereof. 6. Zoning Enactment: A rezoning of a parcel of land to PUD shall not become effective until such time as specified in 1007.015 (h). 7. A complete application for PUD Final Plan shall be submitted no later than one (1) year after the date of approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan, or a time as provided in the developer's agreement. Otherwise, the PUD Preliminary Plan approval shall be considered void, unless an extension, requested in writing and for good cause, is granted by the City Council. The City Council may approve such an extension after the deadline date passes. (e) PUD Final Plan Application. 1. The PUD Final Plan is to serve as a complete, and permanent public record of a specific stage or phase of the PUD Preliminary Plan and the manner in which that stage is to be developed. It shall incorporate all prior approved plans and all approved modifications thereof resulting from the PUD process. It shall serve in conjunction with other provisions of the City Code as the land use regulation applicable to the PUD. 2. Upon approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan and within the time established, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Department an application and PUD Final Plan consisting of the information and submissions required by this Code for the entire PUD or for one (1) or more stages. The PUD Final Plan shall conform to the PUD Preliminary Plan in all respects, and shall be integrated as a coherent statement of the entire Plan. Appropriate cross-referencing and incorporation of recorded documents may be utilized. 3. After review of a PUD Concept Plan and approval of a PUD Preliminary Plan, the applicant will submit the following material for review by the City staff prior to issuance of a building permit: a. A revised PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat of the entire PUD incorporating all changes and conditions that were required. This revised preliminary plat will provide the historical record of the subdivision approval by which subsequent final plats shall be considered. 2-35 b. Information for Final Plat as specified in § 1001.056 of this ordinance. c. Final architectural elevations, in color, of all principal and accessory buildings and structures (type, color, and materials used in all exterior surfaces). Typical floor plan and typical room plan drawn to scale with a summary of square footage by use or activity. d. Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, drainage, utilities and other public improvements e. Any other plans, agreements, or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. 4. The Community Development Department shall forward the PUD Final Plan and Final Plat submission to the City Council for their consideration at a regularly scheduled meeting. 5. The terms of the PUD as approved by the City Council shall be embodied in a Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement, and such other documents as the City shall deem necessary or desirable. The Development and PUD Agreement and any appropriate resolution of the City Council shall be filed with the Anoka County Recorder at the expense of the applicant. At the election of the City, filing of the PUD Preliminary Plan may be delayed until the PUD Final Plan is filed. Where the PUD Preliminary Plan is denied, Council action shall be by written resolution setting forth its findings and conclusions in support of its action. a. Within one (1) year after the approval of a PUD Final Plan, construction shall commence in accordance with such approved plan. Failure to commence construction within such period shall automatically render void, all approvals of the PUD plan unless an extension, requested in writing, is granted by the City Council. The City Council may approve such an extension after the deadline date passes. In such case the area encompassed within the PUD shall thereafter be subject to those provisions of the Zoning Code, and other Code provisions, applicable in the district in which it is located. (f) Plan Modification/Amendment of a Planned Unit Development. 1. Plan modifications/amendments qualifying as minor may be approved by the Community Development Director provided the changes do not involve the following: a. Increase in floor area of structure or number of dwelling units. b. Change in exterior building material. c. Alteration of any condition attached or modification to the PUD Final Plan made by the City Council. 2. Substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the PUD and shall follow the same review procedure as a PUD Preliminary Plan. 2-36 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2-37 § 1007.025 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. (1) When an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW), alternative urban areawide review (AUAR), or environmental impact statement (EIS) is required or otherwise ordered or submitted, the applicable review procedures shall be as set forth in the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board regulations for the Environmental Review Program, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes and specified in Minnesota Rules 4410. (2) An EAW, AUAR, or EIS application, together with the completed data portions of the environmental document, shall be accompanied by a fee and cash escrow as set forth in ordinance. Costs of City time and materials expended in reviewing and processing the application shall be charged against the cash escrow account and credited to the City. If, at any time, the balance in the cash escrow account is depleted to less than 10% of the originally required cash escrow amount, the project proposer shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Any balance remaining in the cash escrow account upon completion of the process shall be returned to the project proposer after all claims and charges thereto have been deducted. (3) Upon completion of the environmental document for distribution and the start of the comment period, the Zoning Administrator shall provide mailed notice of the availability of the environmental document and date of the meeting at which the Environmental Board will accept oral comments on the matter, to all property owners within 600 feet of the boundaries of the property that is the subject of the environmental document. Said notice shall be mailed at least 10 days before the Environmental Board meeting. Failure of a property owner to receive notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth in this Chapter. (4) Following the required comment period, the City shall prepare the final document with a response to comments. The Environmental Board shall review the final document and provide its recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act on the document as required by Minnesota Rules 4410. 2-3 8