Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-07-2022 Council Work Session PacketCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, February 7, 2022 Community Room Z-1A v 114 1. (5:30 pm) The Rookery Activity Center (visit facility) 2. EDAC Advisory Board Interview 10 minutes (Council Workroom) 3. NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates, Katie Larsen 4. Robinson Property PUD Concept Plan, Katie Larsen 5. Fire Division Donation, John Swenson 6. Irrigation Controllers, Mike Grochala, Andy Nelson 7. Capital Asset Policy, Hannah Lynch 8. Blue Heron Days Discussion, Rick DeGardner 9. Coss Family Foundation, John Swenson 10. Shield 616 Donation, John Swenson 11. Public Safety Department Q4 Update, John Swenson 12. Goal Setting, Sarah Cotton 13. Rookery Update, Rick DeGardner 14. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council 15. Adjourn WS — Item 3 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 3 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen Re: NorthPointe 8t' Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates Background At the Work Session, staff will present the attached February 14, 2022 Council staff report. The applicant, Lino Lakes 72, LLC, is final platting a 4.5 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 72 unit, 55+ age restricted independent senior housing building called NorthPointe Garden Estates. It is important to note this is not an assisted -living or senior care facility. This is an age -restricted multi -family building for seniors. The name of the final plat is NorthPointe 8th Addition. Requested Council Direction None, discussion only. Attachments 1. Sheet C3, Site Plan 2. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan 3. Architectural Plans 4. February 14, 2022 Council Staff Report SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" MINIMUM BEHIND CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE SIGN, POST, HARDWARE, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING (IF REQUIRED). 3. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" SOLID WHITE PAINT. 4. ALL HANDICAP STRIPING, MARKINGS AND CROSS -HATCH SHALL BE 4" SOLID BLUE PAINT. 5. ALL SIGNS SHALL MEET THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) FOR RETRO REFLECTIVITY AND INSTALLATION. SITE DATA PROPOSED ZONING: TOTAL AREA: HARD SURFACE AREA: BUILDING: GARAGE: PAVEMENT: TOTAL: PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: PUD 196,177 SF 36,677 SF 19% 2,332 SF 1% 47,337 SF 24% 86,346 SF 44% 109,831 SF 56% PARKING SUMMARY SIGN SCHEDULE (PER MMUTCD,) HANDICAP PARKING SIGN: R7-8m W/R7-8b (12"x 18") STANDARD SURFACE STALLS 62HANDICAP SURFACE STALLS 2 © NO PARKING SIGN: R8-3a (12"x 18") INTERIOR GARAGE STALLS 72 ��- DETACHED GARAGE STALLS 9 TOTAL STALLS 145 ' 30 j' 10 2 / 1 ' 7 W ' 5 FT. 3 0. 9 CONCRETE ' WALK 6 / Q PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE 1?a 4 STORMWATER / �0 5 FT. U' P ' POND RETE CD WALK (EXISTING) � / %, a PROPOSED 4-STORY 8;� a 72-UNIT APARTMENT \ a BUILDING CIO \ y 7 �. N, 77 ,a 4 13 2 // Rim=915.5 - 911.7 --- \ 12" RCP ' -908.7 - - --- a , 1 ->\i ' Inv.(SumP)- --- \ R -- 5 1,3 3 9 --- ---- --- --- ---- -- N T Yp \ \ _ --- -- ---- ---- \�\ \\�°= 6 �06 SHALL s N R2 0 00 / d RO 9, PRAGE �'0 18 rYp Inv.=9 -.6 ^ 4 �2 \-(Per As -built plan, Field Verify) 9 �� 18 / \ u 15 Q� P IV 1 _ ❑ 9 03 9 3 \ 1 i w ;� WETLAND LEGEND I ' EXISTING PROPOSED I PROPERTY LINE -- e' ' EASEMENT LINE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 7L---------L CONCRETE WALK CURB LINE SANITARY SEWER - > >- \ x / STORM SEWER »� /a WATER MAIN FENCE x x FLOODPLAIN fp WETLAND --- GATE VALVE x STORMWATER HYDRANT HYD POND MANHOLE O (EXISTING) ° LIGHT POLEX sMH / SIGN u i ° 5 FT. CONCRETE / WALK / / / 1 / / / / 25 ° / / / / / 12 / / / / / / / 1 10 /x k i / // i / / �32.7 i / / / x / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 10 / / 1 / / R15 Rag / Ali / / / / / / " J N / c a / � / 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) ° BENCHMARKS TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, t135 FEET i SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 21ST / AVE SOUTH AND CHESTNUT STREET. / i ELEVATION = 924.81 (NAVD 88) SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. TYPICAL PARKING STALLS ARE 9' X 18', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. TYPICAL DRIVE LANES ARE 25', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL MEET CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. TRUNCATED DOMES ARE NOT REQUIRED. 6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF DISCREPANCIES AND/OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. 7. SAWCUT ALL JOINTS WHERE CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE REMOVED. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS, CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND EXPANSION JOINTS IN SLAB ON GRADE, SIDEWALKS AND DRIVES PER THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: CONTROL JOINT MAX. SPACING: WALKS-8' O.C. ALL OTHERS-10' O.C. SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS MINIMUM j CONCRETE THICKNESS. EXPANSION JOINTS MAX. SPACING: WALKS-24. O.C. *ALL OTHERS-40' O.C. *AT ALL POINTS WHERE A CHANGE IN PAVEMENT THICKNESS OCCURS AND/OR WHERE NEW PAVEMENT WILL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT, AN EXPANSION JOINT SHALL BE PROVIDED. DOWEL ALL EXPANSION JOINTS: 24" O.C. MAX. SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 1. LANDSCAPE AREA. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 2. 4" CONCRETE WALK. 3. MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER/SIDEWALK/PAVEMENT. 4. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. 5. LIGHT POLE & BASE (TBD). 6. MONUMENT SIGN (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN). PROVIDE ELECTRIC TO SIGN. 7. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER (TBD). 8. FIRE PIT. 9. 3' TAPER OUT CURB. 10. DOG PARK. 11. 3.5 FT. VINYL COATED CHAIN -LINK FENCE. PROVIDE SINGLE GATE AT CONCRETE SLAB. 12. MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. 13. FLUSH CURB. 14. SCREENED GAZEBO. 15. DRIVE UNDER CANOPY. 16. 5'X8' 4" CONCRETE PAD FOR BENCH. J Q 0 Z W U WZO Z Z Z W DC i U 7 Ix 5: w x Z W U) W J 0 m J z o� Q O U O Z LU t: rn n � N ui Z co w 14 ° Ito w x x Q �i o LL O V gem ci LU14 = a Ni M LU `W r Q W Z Z LU O U-)a o� °C a Q LU C7 \ 0 �••� W _�e (n J ZO FBI C: J a 0 Z J J 00 (n M N v �z LUQ � L � � a J U-) 0r'-14-J rl ro FBI J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: JTR DESIGNED BY: JTR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Name: Joseph T. Radach, P.E. Signature: Date: 12/10/21 License #: 45889 C3 of 9 0 CITY OF LINO LAKES LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 1. CANOPY COVER. THE REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE FOR ALL USES IS 40%. MINIMUM CANOPY COVER REQUIRED = 15,112 SF (37,779 SF VEHICULAR AREA x 40%) MINIMUM CANOPY COVER PROVIDED = 15,275 SF LARGE TREES - INTERIOR PARKING ISLANDS (100%) WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50%) - 950 SF (1 TREE x 950 SF) 13,200 SF (22 TREES x 600 SF) MEDIUM TREES WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50%i%i 750 SF (3 TREES x 250 SF) SMALL TREES - WITHIN 7' OF PARKING (50%1 375 SF (3 TREE3 x 125 SF) 2. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM TWO (2) LARGE TREES WITHIN 30 FT OF BUILDING AND SIX (6) LARGE SHRUBS WITHIN 15 FT OF BUILDING PER 100 LF BUILDING PERIMETER. FOUNDATION TREES REQUIRED = 26 (1,294 LF BUILDING PERIMTER) FOUNDATION TREES PROVIDED = 28 (24 LRG. TREES + 8 SM. TREES) FOUNDATION SHRUBS REQUIRED = 78 (1,294 LF BUILDING PERIMETER) FOUNDATION SHRUBS PROVIDED = 194 (143 LRG. SHRUBS + 77 MED. SHRUBS) 3. OPEN AREAS LANDSCAPE. MINIMUM ONE (1) LARGE TREE AND THREE (3) LARGE SHRUBS PER 2000 SF OF OPEN SPACE. OPEN AREA TREES REQUIRED = 55 (109,831 SF OPEN AREA / 2000) OPEN AREA TREES PROVIDED = 67 (57 LRG. TREES + 3 MED. TREES + 16 SM. TREES + 21 EX. 6-12" TREES) OPEN AREA SHRUBS REQUIRED = 165 (109,831 SF OPEN AREA / 2000 x 3) OPEN AREA SHRUBS PROVIDED = 244 (167 LRG. SHRUBS + 116 MED. SHRUBS) 4. BUFFER AND SCREEN. YEAR ROUND CONTINOUS SCREENING IS REQUIRED BETWEEN A PARKING LOT AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR SIDEWALK - 30 IN HEIGHT. ALL CONTINUOUS YEAR ROUND PLANTING SCREENS SHALL REQUIRE AT A MINIMUM A DOUBLE ROW OF PLANTS WITH TRIANGULATED SPACING. SMALL SHRUBS SHALL BE A PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 3' ON CENTER; MEDIUM SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 4' ON CENTER; AND LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 6' ON CENTER. 5. TREE PRESERVATION. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED = 25 TREES REPLACEMENT TREES PROVIDED = 57 TREES f p IRRIGATION REQ UIREDQQ� ��P LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED, PLANTED, OR OTHERWISE LANDSCAPED SHALL BE FULLY Q0o / \ / I 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO IRRIGATED. REFER TO LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION START ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND THAT AFFECT n fp Z �A 1 STORMWATER / POND / c (EXISTING) I BL / 4 WP d}d;-� � d} d} -- V RM HO \ Oo �\ �r\ \\ \\ II IIIIIIII IIII o pR GE ,I 13L 5 _ T--- \\922-- C --A'u 926 — — u,� \ �i� ` —I —I — — gi28 �—ICJ—��913Q— \ , - o —i _ _ Iilililililililil—I— /// // / , / / • °�---�— III �=i I�i�_-III IiIiIIIiIiIi I- i�- fp —� OB / / IIIi1II-Ili IIiIiIi1- I Ii1i1i1i1 O N 1 \ THE WORK SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR / \ CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR APPROVING ANY ADDITIONAL WORK j / \ REQUIRED. 2. UTILITY LOCATES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND VERIFYING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW. IN MINNESOTA, CALL GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. ALL LOCATES AND ITEMS NOTED AS 'FIELD VERIFY' ON THE PLANS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ' I CONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE. SB 3. PERMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3 / I / THAT THE REQUIRED PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER 1 / / START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL / / POND APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. KC FM 2 ! - (EXISTING) 4. EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, SITE CA ♦�/�' ' " / AMENITIES, ETC. THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2 �' - / �' / /�/� CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY DAMAGE (AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE) TO EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. _mod // a �//// � / , , , , , , % 5. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND ACCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SITE ACCESS WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE \V \ RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE BF / IIIII a - - -- - - WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. ALL WASTE AND/OR UNUSED MATERIAL SHALL BE 10 PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 6. SITE REMOVALS. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR GENERAL SITE REMOVALS. ALL ITEMS Bh I ' / NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND � ' IMMEDIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE WITH OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR PD ANY ITEMS NOTED AS 'REMOVED BY OTHERS' OR 'REMOVE AND SALVAGE.' � IIIIIII III � I I-- � °o 00�1 I I I I— 1 7. UTILITY COORDINATION. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO PROPOSED UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS FOR SITE ELECTRICAL WORK AND SITE LIGHTING. 8. CONSTRUCTION STAKING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING CONTROL POINTS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION FIELD s o IIIIIII III _ _ —i- - STAKING DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. — 9. DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO o o -- - o FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT/WALKWAY, OR OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. — Ilo-I 10. PLAN QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL o0 IIIo=1 I ° a, I I I I I I I I I I I� I I � I MATERIAL QUANTITIES PER PLAN. MATERIAL SCHEDULES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY — —ii _— ==--I — �� i-� o CA FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. 33 � 1 11. REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN THIS Mr1R� III / o =- / -I I I m ---- o III PROJECT ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING ORDER: III HL o -_ - III I% IIIIIIII- ° 1. ADDENDA, WITH THOSE OF A LATER DATE HAVING PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE OF AN EARLIER DATE. 2. LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PLAN DRAWINGS. 4. PLANT /MATERIAL SCHEDULES. 5. CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. 6. MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. ♦ / o IIIII °� °° ° � Oa iII— o° / IIII x° � / / % � I I I ♦ I I a I I — / / / / / / / I I � ♦ � IIIIIII —° I I ICI °°� I i I Ili I III IIII � / ,I I l" l o /♦ o l I_ w —I—IiI / / / / / / / / / ; SB =1 \ � —I I � a IIIII — I I I o 2 / , I 1 1_ I�I � I I_I °o IIII I�I� IIIIIII -i--Ii - � � ° � ill ill ill i!I iI ° ♦ ♦ FETE / ��I I I / i / / ; / oo SII I �M� a ° F ♦ II I I � as F I a ° ° ♦ — d N (V / / / _iII KC ° l yFF% I IiI °" v 6 3 - -I- / III li / oo4—STORYo o° o PROPOSED o — I II IIII III III IIIIIIII o o — — o ° 72 UNIT APARTMENT = II II o BUILDING °oo 0 o J L 1 3 I 7 / �♦ °moo oo I = _ / / / / , / s — a o / 920 / ♦ I — — — Ili ' / ♦ o IIIIIII— —IIII \ ® RM / / / / N ♦ �ti---I—I— —I 3 ♦ IiI;I;I;I-IIIIII WO------I—I—I 92p —IIIIIII—IIIIII / K2 918 0 15 30 60 (IN FEET) III III— III III III III c / / i ` —-- I — I — I — I — I— N _cDI III /—io------- ---- —I—I = —------I—I— — 1 /j N III I111111111111111111111111—I III I —I III IIIIIIIIIIIII = _ _ — IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_I / / / / / � = CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ---------I—I—I —I--------I—I� / • I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I I—I—I—�I�— I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I —I / % 920 III IIIIIIII IIIII --- --I------ l j _9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —IIIIIII 0 -- - --_ 920 __ _ ---1-- / �i o / — — — -- — 922— -922 =--- l l l l Know what's below. Call before you dig. � Y 9 J Q 0 Z_ W Z U Z W - Z LuZ Z LLI > 1x i U t9OC� Z i W U) W J N m z OQ � O U or LU 1-1 O I rn w Z w > m M x � X LLI IL �01 O V W of 2 14 a Nj so M LU W a Z14 W J Z o a LU U-) a W IL oe 14 2: rrQnn V Ln- W _�e J zo a FBI � J aJ i O Z J J 000 (n M N a� �z LUQ � L � J � a Ln O4-J ICI J REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY: RJR DESIGNED BY: RJR ISSUE DATE: 12/10/21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name. Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Signature: 62, Date: 12/10/21 License #: 56346 L1 of 4 LINO LAKES - MINNESOTA ®1 =�� moll ff Or er .NON Nrfs rmarw ri■M ■ �3. "igl"r' rwa�:i'- INS f s ' ESE:::::; Ix.. "I'I CE€'€is€ j €n 9€L'€ 9- j IEl€€fEl€ ES' - ���. 1 �� ?��� 1 W. �_ ei:s wn m5 ww® --- w■ rra ■■ ■�I■ rl - MM ;ON Kamm �- �:: i o �. �. � �" __ � � � I�+' � �•� •.• •,• �;� •...,• �:� �� -'I ,. a■■. I --I �s.i I I �� � � � rim eb r■ ai it - - ii� ir' �� �: Msun MMEno MM 11:1HR Wifl ANI: M::M: a w M. a MEN ------- --- -_.:�.: _:�:- �iY 2� "N .�� L�Sr_u i�i i��' ry"4=:Fti�. '-3_56ei_ tr H�7.�iY ".�f.•_-_•>>.�.: is `�"uL'i ------------------------- 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022 TOPIC: NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates i. Consider Resolution No. 22-16 Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat ii. Consider Resolution No. 22-17 Approving Development Agreement (To Follow) VOTE REQUIRED: 315 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: December 16, 2021 60-Day Review Deadline: February 14, 2022 60-Day Extension Deadline: April 15, 2022 Environmental Board Meeting: January 4, 2022 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 12, 2022 City Council Work Session: February 7, 2022 City Council Meeting: February 14, 2022 BACKGROUND The applicant, Lino Lakes 72, LLC, is final platting a 4.5 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 72 unit, 55+ age restricted independent senior housing building called NorthPointe Garden Estates. It is important to note this is not an assisted -living or senior care facility. This is an age -restricted multi -family building for seniors. The name of the final plat is NorthPointe 8th Addition. The Land Use Application is for the following: oo PUD Final Plan/Final Plat o Outlot A, NorthPointe 5th Addition to Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 8"' Addition oo Site & Building Plan Review o Independent senior housing building This staff report is based on the following information: oo INH Project Description oo ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021 oo Final Plat for NorthPointe 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received December 13, 2021 oo Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021 oo Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23, 2021 oo Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. dated September 8, 2021 oo Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions dated December 13, 2021 oo Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. dated January 5, 2022 ANALYSIS History The subject site is legally described as Outlot A, NorthPointe 5th Addition and is part of the NorthPointe residential housing development. Per the 2014 Council Resolution No. 14-21 approving the entire NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, this outlot is required to be developed as an age restricted (55+) multiple family dwelling consistent with the regulations of the R-4, High Density Residential District with underground parking for 50% of the required stalls and at a density of 20 to 25 dwelling units per acre. Future development of this outlot shall require a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, Development Contract and Site Plan Review. The Developer shall record against the outlot a declaration or other document stating these requirements. Proposed Project Per the Applicant's Project Description, the improvements will consist of a 3 story 72 unit building, constructed over a one story at -grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The project will be constructed out of wood framing with the use of varying pitched roofs to give architectural appeal to the area. The use of varying styles of stone/brick help the building meet the 33% material requirements, while giving an aesthetic feel to the fagade. Varying siding and decorative elements make up the rest of the building design. Multiple amenity spaces are incorporated within the building enhancing the overall experience for the residents of this project. Featured amenities will include: On -site Management Office, Community Room, Fitness Center, Mail and Package Lockers, Woodshop, Game Room and Salon. A variety of floor plans will include One Bedroom, One Bedroom + Den, Two Bedroom and Two Bedroom + Den options for residents to select. A tentative 15 month construction schedule is May/June 2022 start and August 2023 completion and occupancy. Existing Site Conditions Per the December 10, 2021 Stormwater Management Plan, the 4.5 acre site is bounded on the north by wetland, on the east by Interstate 35E, on the south by agricultural property, and on the west by Chestnut Street. The site was previously partially graded as part of the overall mass grading for the NorthPointe master plan of development. As part of the master plan of development, two wet sedimentation basins were constructed on or adjacent to the site to provide rate control and water quality treatment for the proposed site. The NorthPointe residential development consists of 216 single family detached homes. Zoning and Land Use In 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 02-14 rezoning the entire NorthPointe development including this outlot from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Current Zoning PUD, Planned Unit Development Current Land Use Vacant Residential Future Land Use per CP Medium Density Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Density Density calculations are based on the entire NorthPointe residential development. The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 94.09 Wetlands (9.21) Public Parks & Open Space (5.28) Arterial ROW (0.26) Other (Floodplain) (3.14) Other (Wetland Buffer -Conservation Easement Area) (5.72) Net Area (acres) 70.48 # of Units 299 Gross Density (units/acre) 3.18 Net Density (units/acre) 4.24 The 299 housing units consists of the 215 existing NorthPointe single family homes, 1 existing house at 2162 Cedar Street, 11 future single homes and the proposed 72 unit independent senior building. The NorthPointe residential development was approved in 2014 under the land use control of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The development was guided medium density residential and required 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre. The developer wanted to build single family detached homes and in order to meet density requirement, this outlot was created and reserved for the purpose of constructing a higher density, age restricted, multi -family building. Under today's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the entire development is still guided medium density residential which requires 4.0 to 6.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of the entire development is 4.24 units per net acre which is consistent with the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan and NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan guided land use and density. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future 2040 Land Use North PUD, Planned Unit NorthPointe Park Park & Open Space Development South R, Rural Agricultural Low Density Residential I-35E and R-1, Single Family Low Density East Single Family Residential Residential Residential PUD, Planned Unit Open Space, Wetland Open Space & West Development & Single Family Single Family Residential Residential Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The PUD Final Plan/Final Plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for medium density development & the NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat. The development also conforms with the zoning code requirements for R-4, High Density Residential District as detailed below. Blocks and Lots The NorthPointe preliminary plat was approved in March 2014. The final plat for Outlot A, NorthPointe 5t' Addition was approved in April 2017. This outlot is being re -platted for this project as Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 8th Addition. Parcel Acres Purpose Lot 1, Block 1 4.5 Independent Senior Housing Building Streets and Alleys No new streets are required for the independent senior housing building. Driveway ingress/egress will be from Chestnut Street, a local road. The existing temporary cul de sac will remain for emergency vehicle turnaround. This cul de sac will be removed in the future when Chestnut Street extends to the south. No additional street right-of-way is required. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along the lot lines. A minimum 10 ft. wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland and stormwater pond facility and is provided on the final plat. A separate trail easement for the existing trail on the northwest end of the lot has been recorded. Public Land Dedication The City will collect a cash fee of $227,520 in lieu of land dedication for NorthPointe 8t' Addition. The independent senior housing building is within the NorthPointe park service area and no additional park land dedication is required. NorthPointe 81h Addition # Units = 72 Residential Park Dedication Fee = $3, ] 60 TOTAL = $227,520 Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The applicant is proposing to construct a 3 story, 72 unit building, constructed over a one story at -grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The site plan includes a paved parking lot, detached garage, senior building, landscaped courtyard with fire pit and gazebo, dog park area, sidewalk connection to existing trail, wetland and stormwater pond open space. The building footprint is 36,677 sf. The January 12, 2022 Planning & Zoning staff report details the projects compliance with zoning setbacks, building design criteria, height, lighting and parking requirements. Overall, the proposed independent senior housing building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Setbacks The R-4, High Density Residential District zoning requirements apply to this project. The Site Plan Review Worksheet details setback requirements. The principal building 30 ft. setback is met along the Chestnut Street front lot line. The 20 ft. north and south side yard setbacks are also met. Staff notes the detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street and would need to be relocated or removed. PUD Flexibility The required building setback along an arterial street (I-35E) is 40 ft. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility to reduce this setback from 40 ft. to 20 ft. to allow for the proposed building footprint and development of the courtyard amenities. The building will be 120 ft. from the centerline of the southbound lane of I-35E and 330 ft. from the nearest house in NorthPointe. Shifting the building east also provides additional separation from the NorthPointe single family detached homes. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials Per City Code Section 1007.043(2), General Building and Use Provisions: (c) Multiple Family Apartments Construction Standards: 1. The exterior of multiple family dwelling structures shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, multiple family dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a. A minimum of thirty-three (33) percent of the combined area of all building exterior walls of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone. b. For the purposes of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. Exterior materials consist of stone veneer, brick veneer, LP lap siding and asphalt shingles. The building includes decorative trim board, stone band, stone cap, 4" window trim, horizontal LP lap siding, vertical board and batten and decorative gable corbels. This variety of materials and accents provide visual interest, articulation and depth to the building. The color palette consists of greys (carbon, driftwood gray), black, white and browns (Java and wood grain siding). The building has 41% masonry stone and brick. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. Per City Code Section 1007.095 R-4, High Density Residential District: (1) Height Regulation. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty- five (45) feet in height —or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4) stories or forty-five (45) feet —except as allowed by § 1007.043 (3). The R-4 zoning district allows for 4 story multiple dwelling buildings. The proposed senior building is 4 stories (52 ft. measured to the roof midpoint) and is compliant with performance standards. Trash/recycling enclosure and mechanical equipment are located inside the building in the garage level. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. The following chart is a summary of the bedroom and unit mix: # of Bedrooms # of Units One bedroom = 3 One bedroom with den = 7 10 Two bedrooms = 47 Two bedrooms with den = 12 TOTAL = City Code Section 1007.095(5) states the minimum livable floor area for each multiple family dwelling unit shall be 700 sf plus 100 ft. additional square feet for each bedroom. This would require the one bedroom units to be a minimum 800 sf and the two bedroom units to be a minimum of 900 sf. Sheets A102-A104 provides a summary chart of the unit sizes ranging from 792 sf to 1,284 sf. The A.1 one bedroom units are less than 800 sf and shall be revised. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. The site photometric plan shows 5 light poles in the parking lot that are 25 ft. tall with downlit and cutoff light fixtures. The foot candle measurements, light poles and fixtures meet ordinance requirements. Off -Street Parking Requirements Per City Code Section 1007.044(6), (d) Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. In addition to the City ordinance, PUD Resolution No. 14-21 requires 50% of the parking stalls to be underground. The 72 unit senior building requires 72 parking spaces with at least 36 underground. Sheet C3, Site Plan indicates 62 surface stalls, 2 handicap surface stalls, 72 interior (underground) and 9 detached garage stalls for a total of 145 parking spaces. Parking requirements are met. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10 2021, the drainage boundary being considered is 113.810 acres, which includes all drainage from the overall NorthPointe development. Drainage areas affected by the proposed construction include the stormwater pond 300P located in the northern portion of the site, the stormwater pond 200P just outside the west-northwest property boundary (Pond 200P), Catchment 33S and 12S to Wetland 1P, which also receives stormwater from the outlets of Ponds 200P and 300P, and Catchment 11S to Ditch 3P, which is the receiving body for Wetland 1P. The proposed site will only affect drainage to these areas. The majority of the site flows to Ponds 200P and 300P. The remaining stormwater drains between Ponds 200P and 300P to Wetland 1P or to Ditch 3P. All stormwater, ultimately flows to Ditch 3P. The proposed construction will maintain the drainage areas provided in the overall NorthPointe master development plan to the maximum extent possible. The proposed apartment lot will meet the overall stormwater treatment requirements from the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit. Adequate water quality treatment and rate control is provided by the existing regional ponds, wetlands, and ditches. All storm sewers have been sized to accommodate a 10-year storm at a minimum. The proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the existing stormwater infrastructure originally planned for the development of the site. The City Engineer and RCWD have reviewed the stormwater management plan. Public Utilities The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards Per the January 4, 2022 Environmental Board staff report: The Tree Inventory identifies 55 trees of which 22 will be preserved and 33 will be removed. Of the 33 removals, 27 trees are in Basic Use Area and non -environmentally sensitive areas. These removals will not require mitigation trees. The other 6 removals are in Basic Use Area and Natural Resource Protected Area. Three (3) of these trees are undesirable, due to being in poor condition or being an invasive species and do not require mitigation. The other 3 trees require mitigation at the rate of 1 mitigation tree per 2 trees removed, resulting in 2 mitigation trees being required for the project. Mitigation trees have been credited through open space plantings. Preservation and mitigation standards have been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft. 109,831 sq. ft. of open space requires: 55 large trees 165 large shrubs Provided: 61 large trees or large tree equivalents 115 large shrubs or large shrub equivalents Open areas landscape standards have not been met. 50 additional shrubs will be needed in open space areas. Buffer and Screen Standards Buffer and/or screen will be required along the east lot line. The retaining wall will satisfy part of the requirements. Planting an additional 4 trees and 5 large shrubs will satisfy the requirements. Additional coniferous trees are required along the west lot line. Buffers and screens as planned do not meet the requirements. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Vehicular hardscape planned: 37,779 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 15,112 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 15,425 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirements have been met. Foundation Landscaping Two (2) large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building abutting a public or private street. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The foundation plantings required for the Chestnut Street southwest side: Required: 2 large trees 7 large shrubs Provided: 4 large tree equivalents 23 large shrub equivalents The foundation plantings required for the I-35E east side: Required: 6 large trees 19 large shrubs Provided: 2 large tree equivalents 14 large shrubs equivalents Four (4) large trees and 5 large shrubs should be planted east of the retaining wall along the northeast section of building that runs parallel with the lot line. The foundation landscape requirements have not been met for the east building face. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The plan indicates sod in the common area in the center of the building, along the east and west building faces, and along the south edge of the parking lot and access road. Due to the area east of the retaining wall being higher in elevation, on sandy soil, and being quite exposed, a dry prairie mix should be better suited than the wet meadow mix proposed. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required for multi -family developments at a rate of 1 tree per 70 linear feet. The front lot line along Chestnut Street is 173 if which would require 2 boulevard trees. Five (5) boulevard trees are proposed and this requirement has been met. Signage Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument and wall signs. Sign permit applications are required for all temporary signs as well. Impervious Surface Coverage The R-4 zoning district states the impervious surface of the property shall not exceed 65%. Plan Sheet C3, Site Plan notes 44% hard/impervious surface. Impervious surface requirements are met. Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was completed in November 2013 by Westwood Professional Services as part of the overall NorthPointe residential development and it included analysis for an 85 unit senior apartment. This report detailed compliance with City ordinance level of service requirements for the entire development. A Traffic Analysis Memorandum was completed on December 13, 2021 by S2 Traffic Solutions as an update to the 2013 study reflecting the proposed 72 unit senior building. The updated analysis takes into account the COVID-19 pandemic and applies a 1.4% growth factor. 10 Trip Generation Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) standards and traffic counts collected by Quality Counts on December 7, 2021, the 72 unit senior building is forecasted to generate approximately 233 daily trips with 15 peak hour AM trips (7:15-8:15am) and 18 peak hour PM trips (4:15-5:15pm). Land use(code) Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Eater Exit 5 Trips 16 Trips XO Trips I S Trips Senior Attached Housing (252) 72 Units 233 Trips TOTAL 233 Trips 15Trlps IS Trips It is important to note that an age -restricted 55+ independent senior housing building will generate less trips than a multi -family housing building. Existing Arterial and Collector Roadway AADT & Capacity rRoadwayFunctional AADT1 Daily Road Class (year) Capacity Main St (CSAH 14) Minor Arterial 16,500 (2018) 32,000 20t' Ave S (CSAH 54) Minor Arterial 3,000-6,100 (2018) 15,000 Birch St (CSAH 34) Major Collector 3,150 (2018) 15,000 Ash St (CR J) Minor Arterial 10,500 (2014) 15,000 'Annual Average Daily Traffic The AADT on the existing arterial and collector roadways are less than daily road capacity. Level of Service Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions and driver delay (measured in seconds) of an intersection. Operations are given letter designations from "A" (best operating conditions) to "F" (worst conditions). City Code Section 1007.020, Site Plan Review and Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. 11 2024 No -Build Overall LOS 2024 Build Overall LOS Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak 20th Ave S& Main St C C C C 20th Ave S& W Cedar St A A A A 201h Ave S& Red Oak Ln A A A A 201h Ave S& Birch St A A A A 201h Ave S& Ash St B B B C The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the subdivision is not considered premature and the traffic generated by the senior building is within the capabilities of the City's road system. NorthPointe Road System Red Oak Lane, Cypress Street and 21St Avenue South are minor collector roads within the NorthPointe residential development. Minor collector roads are designed and intended to handle 1,000-3,000 daily trips. Per the original 2013 NorthPointe Traffic Study, the entire NorthPointe residential development (single family homes and senior apartment) was projected to have 313 housing units and generate approximately 2,534 daily trips. This is well within the capacity of the entire NorthPointe road system. The actual housing unit count of 299 is less than the original 313. In December 2019, a Traffic Impact Study completed for Nadeau Acres collected existing daily traffic counts on Red Oak Lane east of 201h Avenue S. at 1,000 ADT. The City also collected daily traffic counts in August 2021 on Red Oak Lane east of 20th Ave S. at 987 ADT. These trip counts are consistent and are low for a minor collector road. Figure 6 of the 2021 Traffic Analysis completed for NorthPointe Garden Estates indicates 10 additional AM peak trips and 8 additional PM peak trips on Red Oak Lane. As noted, level of service is not impacted. The 18 existing homes on Chestnut Street generate approximately 180 daily trips. The local road has capacity for 1,000 daily trips. Chestnut Street has capacity for an additional 233 daily trips generated by the senior housing building. It should also be noted that Chestnut Street, 2 1 " Avenue S., Cypress St. and Red Oak Lane all have sidewalks that provide safe pedestrian corridors in the area. A trail from Chestnut Street extends to NorthPointe Park. Further, with future development of the property south of NorthPointe, Cypress Street and Chestnut Street will extend south and Birch Street will extend east providing additional ingress and egress roads to the development. 12 Conclusion The traffic study results are similar and marginally better than predicted in the original analysis. The proposed development has appropriate access to the site and to the surrounding roadway network. The traffic operational analysis indicates there is available capacity on the roadways surrounding the site to accommodate site -generated traffic. The roadway network has capacity for an additional 233 daily trips generated by the senior housing building. Staff will re-evaluate resident concerns regarding current speeding and traffic issues on Red Oak Lane and Dogwood Court unrelated to the NorthPointe Garden Estates project. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is within the revised 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The project is consistent with Land Use Scenario 1 and 2 for medium density residential development. No further environmental review is required. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on December 3, 2013 for the entire NorthPointe development. A WCA Notice of Decision (NOD) was issued by RCWD on April 11, 2014. The NOD is only valid for 5 years so a new wetland delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug on September 8, 2021 for the one (1) existing wetland on the senior housing building site. A new WCA NOD approving the wetland delineation was issued by RCWD on October 21, 2021. One 0.085 acre wetland area was delineated on the south end the site. The wetland is a Type 3/2 (PEMC/A) shallow marsh and wet meadow wetland. The wetland area (0.085 acre) is slightly smaller than the original approved wetland area (0.12 acre). No impacts to this wetland are proposed. The wetland is part of the Wetland Management Corridor and a conservation easement currently exists over the wetland as part of the original NorthPointe development. The easement area may be amended to allow for design of the parking lot with approval from RCWD. The total area of the easement would remain the same. A minimum 10 ft. wide drainage and utility easement is required and is provided above the delineated wetland. Shoreland District The site is not within a Shoreland District. 13 Floodplain The 2015 FEMA floodplain map indicates Zone A floodplain along the west edge of the site. However, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was obtained on December 21, 2016 for the entire NorthPointe development. The floodplain boundary was revised and is no longer on the site. Noise Study A Traffic Noise Assessment for NorthPointe Garden Estates was completed on January 5, 2022 by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The report evaluated 1-35E noise compared to daytime and nighttime noise standards. Noise standards are met under the following conditions: 1. The building shall be constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A). 2. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control. 3. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows. 4. Per page 8 of the Traffic Noise Assessment, exterior wall construction shall consist of: a. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior wall. i. This material will be 7/16" thick and a wood fiber material. b. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation. c. The inside finish shall be 5/8" gypsum board. d. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354" and be of a wood fibrous material. e. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970" and be of a wood fibrous material. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments MNDOT MNDOT provided comments on January 26, 2022. They noted the need for possible noise mitigation and a drainage permit. Noise mitigation has been addressed with building construction materials as previously noted. The applicant shall apply for a drainage permit. Public Safety Comments The Fire Division reviewed the plans and notes the following: 1. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the building. a. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to provide emergency vehicle access. 2. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be added. 3. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance stretchers. The Police Division reviewed the plans and did not identify any public safety concerns that should be addressed. 14 Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their January 4, 2022 meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the final plat and site plan on January 12, 2022. Some residents expressed concerns regarding possible traffic and noise impacts. The Board recommended approval with a 4-0 vote. City Attorney The City Attorney has reviewed the title commitment and final plat. The title commitment shall be updated and list Lino Lakes 72, LLC as the proposed insured party. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) RCWD issued a CAPROC January 26, 2022. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City as it relates to the NorthPointe 81h Addition final plat. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement may be required by the City as is relates to the NorthPointe Garden Estates development or the required securities may be collected with the Development Agreement. Declaration of Covenants As required by Resolution No. 14-21, the developer shall record against the property an age - restriction declaration. The applicant has submitted a declaration and it is under review by the City Attorney. 15 Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP's such as curb, gutter, and stormwater pond. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for medium density residential. The proposed independent senior housing building is consistent with residential density land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are supported by the independent senior housing building. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. The arterial, collector and local roads have capacity to handle the traffic volume of the independent senior housing building. Sidewalks and trails are in place to provide safe pedestrian corridors. Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Findings of Fact The Findings of Fact for NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates PUD Final Plan/Final Plat are detailed in Resolution No. 22-16. RECOMMENDATION Staff and Boards recommend approval of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat and Development Agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 22-16 2. Final Plat 3. Resolution No. 22-17 4. Development Agreement (To Follow) 16 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO.22-16 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION PUD FINAL PLAN/FINAL PLAT WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for NorthPointe 81h Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat hereafter referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed Development based on the following plans and information: oo INH Project Description oo ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021 oo Final Plat for NorthPointe 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received December 13, 2021 oo Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021 oo Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23, 2021 oo Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021 oo Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. dated September 8, 2021 oo Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions dated December 13, 2021 oo Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Bras]au Associates, Inc. dated January 5, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat on March 10, 2014 with Resolution No. 14-21; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the Development on January 12, 2022; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development is not considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat subject to the conditions listed below. 2. The City Attorney has reviewed the status of title/property ownership related to the final plat and provided comments as noted below. 3. A Development Agreement has been drafted and shall be executed. 4. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat have been fulfilled or secured by the Development Agreement. 5. All fees, charges and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat have been paid in full. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves NorthPointe 8t' Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration may be amended with approval from RCWD. 2. A Development Agreement and securities related to the final plat are required. 3. A Site Performance Agreement and securities related to NorthPointe Garden Estates are required or securities shall be collected with the Development Agreement. 4. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater management facilities is required. 5. A Declaration of Covenants detailing age -restriction is required. 6. A temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit are required over the cul-de-sac. 7. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon and wall signage. 8. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage. 9. PUD, Planned Unit Development flexibility is provided to reduce the principal and accessory building setback along I-35E from 40ft to 20ft. 10. All parking stalls (surface, interior garage and detached garage) shall be provided rent free to all tenants. 11. The following noise mitigation standards apply: a. The building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A). b. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control. c. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows. d. Exterior wall construction shall consist of the following or comparable materials: i. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior wall. 1. This material will be 7/16" thick and a wood fiber material. ii. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation. iii. The inside finish shall be 5/8" gypsum board. iv. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354" and be of a wood fibrous material. v. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970" and be of a wood fibrous material. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following items being addressed prior to release of the mylars or issuance of a building permit: 1. All comments from the City Engineer memo dated January 5, 2022 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated January 5, 2022 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Lino Lakes Fire Division shall be addressed: a. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the building. i. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to provide emergency vehicle access. ii. The developer shall consult with Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire and City Engineer. b. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be added. c. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance stretchers. 4. All comments from the MNDOT letter dated January 26, 2022 shall be addressed. 5. All comments from the City Attorney shall be addressed: a. The title commitment shall be updated. b. The title commitment shall list Lino Lakes 72, LLC as the proposed insured party. 6. The applicant shall draft a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities for the private stormwater maintenance facility. 7. The applicant shall draft a temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit for the cul- de-sac. 8. The applicant shall draft an amendment to the existing Conservation Easement and Wetland Buffer Declaration for City review and comment. a. The documents shall include both RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes as parties. b. The exhibit shall provide location of Protected Open Space Area monument signs. 9. All applicable plan sheets: a. All plan sheets shall be dated. b. The detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street and shall be relocated or removed. 10. Sheet C3, Site Plan: a. Setbacks shall be measured from balcony support beams on the north side of the building. 11. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan: a. A landscape screen and buffer are required along the east and south lot lines. 12. Sheets A102-A104 Floor Plans: a. The A.1 one bedroom unit is less than 800sf and shall be revised. 13. Sheet A010, Site Plan: a. The parking calculations shall be revised to reflect City ordinance requirements. b. Setback lines i. The front building setback line shall note 30ft. ii. The "25 number note" on the north side near the detached garage shall point to the 20ft setback line. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member and was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 4 Rob Rafferty, Mayor NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 25, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 0 7 00 or <� OCO 1< \ o,���� POND o a a C� / Edge of water \ / ,--located on 9/03/21 <) gg w c / � � -4. I / a a . BLOCK 1 // a �� / robe Width / (0 J / a 40 LOT 1 1 1 o� l South line of Outlot A,__,' Tvv',4_v, / ',-1/2 inch pipe / NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION S89 57 14 W Broken Cap For the purposes of this plat, the South line of OUTLOT A, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION is assumed to have a bearing of South 89 degrees 57 minutes 14 seconds West. _I, Denotes Found Iron Monument, marked with license number 40361 unless otherwise shown Denotes Right of Access dedicated to the State of Minnesota per the plat of NORTHPOINTE Denotes Wetland location delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services in September of 2021 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: being 5 feet in width, and adjoining side lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 (SCALE IN FEET) 1 INCH = 50 FEET KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Lino Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, NORTHPOINTE 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Lino Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 LINO LAKES 72, LLC James E. Illies, Chief Manager STATE OF _ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. by James E. Illies, Chief Manager of Lino (Signed) (Printed) Notary Public, My commission expires I Thomas R. Balluff do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of STATE OF _ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 20 Thomas R. Balluff, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 40361 by Thomas R. Balluff. Notary Public, My commission expires (Signed) (Printed) This plat of NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By: , Mayor COUNTY SURVEYOR By: , Clerk I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this of 20 David M. Zieglmeier Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of , 20 Property Tax Administrator By: , Deputy COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES County of Anoka, State of Minnesota day Also, pursuant to I hereby certify that this plat of NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock M. and was duly recorded as Document Number County Recorder/Registrar of Titles Deputy CAR LSO N NM M SCAI N ENGINEERING \ SURVEYING \ ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO.22-17 RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council approved the NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat with Resolution No. 22-16 on February 14, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the Development Agreement between Lino Lakes 72, LLC and the City of Lino Lakes for NorthPointe 8th Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member and was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk WS — Item 4 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 4 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen, City Planner Re: Robinson Property PUD Concept Plan Review BACKGROUND The applicant, Integrate Properties, LLC, submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan review. The proposed development is a master planned residential community located on the Robinson property south of CSAH 14 (Main Street) and east of CR 53 (Sunset Avenue). The site contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 157 gross acres and consists of mix of housing types totaling 707 housing units. Staff notes the concept plan says 710 housing units but the count totals 707. Future land use applications may include: oo Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Utility Staging Area o Move one (1) parcel (PID #07-31-22-22-0001) from Stage 1B (2025- 2030) to Stage IA (2018-2025) oo Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) oo Rezone property from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development oo PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat oo PUD Final Plan/Final Plat This staff report is based on the following submittals: oo Concept Plan Submittal Narrative prepared by Integrate Properties, LLC dated December 13, 2021 oo ALTA Survey prepared by Alliant Engineering dated October 29, 2021 oo Robinson Property Concept Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 oo Robinson Property Concept Plan -Site Rendering Graphic prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 oo Robinson Property Surrounding Area Map prepared by Alliant Engineering dated December 13, 2021 ANALYSIS History In October 2006, a concept plan for Robinson Lakes was reviewed at a Council Work Session. The concept plan included 680 acres of Robinson property located both north and south of Main Street. The plan included a residential mix of single family homes, multi -family and active adult multi -family. Lakes, open space and greenway system with parks and trails were incorporated throughout the development. Unfortunately, due to the onset of housing recession, this project never moved forward. Current Proposal The current proposal includes 157 acres of Robinson property that is south of Main Street. The applicant is proposing the following mix of residential unit types: sin Te Lot Width # Units 7 7s,irgle Family Lots = 65 ft 98ngle Family Lots = 55 ft 82 Single Family Lots = 50 ft 83 Townhomes (Back to Back) = 28 ft 64 Townhomes (Row) = 24 ft 100 Multi -Family Housing = (14 buildings x 20 units) TBD 280 TOTAL = 707 Single family detached home neighborhoods are located in the northwest section and southeast quadrant of the site. The townhome neighborhood is centrally located on the east side. A gated multi -family rental neighborhood and clubhouse are located in the northeast quadrant of the site. Trails, sidewalks, stormwater ponds and lakes are included throughout the development. The entire site will be mass graded in one (1) phase to create stormwater ponds and lakes. Neighborhood construction would be phased. Mass grading anticipated to start Winter 2023 with home construction anticipated to begin July 2023. Full build will be phased over 4 to 5 years. Please see the attached applicant's narrative for a detailed description of the project. Existing Conditions The predominant existing land use is agricultural related to Robinson Sod Farm. The MLCCS classification is sod on hydric soils. Public ditch ACD 10-22-32 and private ditches drain the site south. Wetlands appear to be located along the ditch corridors. A majority of the site is in the floodplain and mitigation will be utilized for stormwater management (lakes and ponds), creation of a multi -functional greenway system (parks and trails) and providing fill for house pads, streets and other upland areas. A 100 ft. 2 wide pipeline easement and a 90 ft. wide transmission utility bisects the southeast quadrant of the site. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Agricultural Mix of Residential Densities South PUD (Century Agricultural Medium Density Farm North) East R, Rural Rural Residential High Density & Low Density FR, Farm LDR, Low Density West Residence Wetland/Open Space Residential (City of Blaine) Surrounding land uses include medium density single family detached homes and townhomes to the south in Century Farms North. Larger rural residential lots exist to the east and to the southeast along Carl Street. Comprehensive Plan and Housing Density The 157 acre site has multiple land use designations per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan creating somewhat of a checkerboard patterned look. These land uses include low density, medium density, high density and planned residential/commercial. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is located in Planning District 2 and includes Planned Residential/Commercial areas. The Comprehensive Plan states: oo "Planning District 2 includes Planned Residential/Commercial areas. o The Robinson Farm and Main Street site is planned to accommodate an 80/20 percent mix of residential and commercial. While allowed in all areas, commercial development will be required in at least one quadrant. To ensure implementation the City may choose to rezone land to a compatible neighborhood commercial zoning district upon completion of a corridor plan. A Master Plan for the Main Street Corridor between Sunset Avenue and 4th Avenue should be completed." It is important to note the 80/20 percent mix is related only to the approximate 40 acres of land guided for Planned Residential Commercial. The Robinson Farm and Main Street site referenced in the Comprehensive Plan includes property on both the north and south side of Main Street. The subject site for this PUD Concept Plan proposal is only on the south side of Main Street and would not necessarily require a commercial component. The following chart summarizes the site's general density range per gross and net acres: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Gross Acres Net Acres Allowed Units per Acre Allowed # Units Low High Low High Low Density Res 77.4 64.5 1.6 3.0 103 194 Medium Density Res 19.9 17.8 4.0 6.0 71 107 High Density Res 39.8 35.7 6.0 8.0 214 285 Planned Res / Comm 19.9 17.8 8.0 10.0 143 178 TOTAL 157.1 135.8 531 764 GROSS DENSITY 3.4 4.9 NET DENSITY AJW 3.9 1 5.6 The preliminary density ranges would be 3.9 to 5.6 units per net acre which equates to 531 to 764 housing units. The applicant is proposing 707 housing units which is consistent with the density range. It should be noted that net acreage will be re -calculated based on post -development during the preliminary plat process. Gateway Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan & Planning District 2, a gateway shall be planned and created on the south side of Main Street (CSAH 14) at Sunset Road (CR 53). Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to allow for a variety of lot widths and housing types. The applicant would need to provide additional public benefit in order to be considered for PUD zoning. Examples could be open space, enhanced greenway corridor, wetland restoration, additional wetland buffers, higher architectural & building standards etc. Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per Low density, Medium density, High density and 2040 Comp Plan planned residential/commercial Utility Staging Area Stage IA (2018-2025) Stage 113 (2025-2030) Zoning Requirements and Standards Baseline/Conventional Zoning Districts M As with any PUD, the City starts with the conventional zoning district as the baseline. The following chart provides the 2040 Comprehensive Plan -Land Use Designation and the coinciding Baseline/Conventional Zoning District: 2040 Comp Plan Land Use Gross Acres Coinciding Basline/ Conventional Zoning District Housing Type Lot Width (ft) Lot Depth (ft) Lot Size (si) Low Density Res 77 R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 RAX,SinglceFa Executive single fa 90 135 12,825 R-2, Two Fanily Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two -fa unit lot) 50 1 150 7,500 Medium Density Re 20 R-2, Two Fanily Residential single fangly 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 150 7,500 R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 140 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome 24 NA NA High Density Res 40 R-4, High Density Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 120 6,000 R-41 High Density Residential townhome or other multi-farnily NA NA NA A Planned Res/Comm OIL - 20 R-4, High Density Residential two-faunit lot) 50 120 6,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome or other multi -family NA NA NA TOTAL =l 157 Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. The proposed lot widths for the detached single family homes are 50 ft., 55 ft. and 65 ft. The proposed townhome lot widths are 24 ft. PUD flexibility would be required for the 50 ft. and 55 ft. wide single family lots. Setbacks The following chart compares the standard City ordinance requirements to the proposed setbacks. Residential Singl City Ordinance Proposed Setbacks Family Requirement Front Yard R-1 = 30 ft. 25 ft. R-2 = 25 ft. R-1 & R-2 = 5 ft. garage / 10 ft. Side Yard 5 ft. garage/ house 10 ft. house or 7.5 ft./7.5 ft. Side Yard Setback to R-1 = 30 ft. 25 ft. Right of Way R-2 = 25 ft. Setback to County Road 40 ft. 50 ft. Townhomes City Ordinance Proposed Distance Private driveway length 25 ft.a 22 ft. Private driveway width 26 ft. 24 ft. back to back Building separation 10 ft. 20 ft. 'The R-2 district requires a 25ft house setback which would provide a 25ft long driveway More detailed information is required to analyze each lot in regards to lot sizes, lot widths and depths and setbacks. PUD flexibility would be required to allow for reduced setbacks. Building Design Standards The applicant's narrative includes renderings of the proposed housing products. More detailed information will be required to fully analyze each housing product. The building design standards of the residential zoning districts shall be used as the starting baseline for each housing product in regards to floor area, utility area, garages etc. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of single family lots, townhome lots and multi -family building lots. The lots vary in width, depth and lot size as may be allowed per the PUD flexibility. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Per City Code Section 1001.097 (1) Length. The maximum length of blocks shall be 1,500 feet and the minimum length 400 feet. Blocks over 900 feet long may require pedestrianways at least ten feet wide at their approximate center. The use of additional pedestrianways to schools, parks and other destinations may be required. Per the 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails System Plan, local and regional trails are proposed along both the north and south side of CSAH 14 (Main Street). Additional pedestrian ways shall be included to CSAH 14 (Main Street) to provide connectivity to the development. Pedestrian connection and trails to Sunset Avenue are provided at the street and northwest corner of the site. The existing house at 7902 Sunset Avenue should be incorporated into the development as large 2 acre lot. A ghost plat shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat process. Connection of the existing house to municipal utilities shall be evaluated. Streets and Alleys CSAH 14 (Main Street) is Principal Arterial road. CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) is a Major Collector road. Internal roads are local roads intended to serve the site. 2 Per the City's 2040 Transportation Plan and Planning District 2: oo Plan for the extension of Sunset Road (CR 53) north to Pine Street. Development of the Robinson property to the north of Main Street will need to consider this extension. oo Continue to implement the Main Street (CSAH 14) Access Management Study. oo Work with Anoka County on the creation of a new full -access intersection on Main Street at a new road at the 200 block. The concept plan provides a new Main Street full access near the 200 block and is consistent with Access Management Study and the City's Transportation Plan. oo An east/west minor collector road extending to 4th Avenue is required. Per the 2040 Transportation Plan and the Access Management Plan, Robinson Drive is shown to extend east to 4th Avenue as the east/west minor collector. This serves as an important backage road to Main Street (CSAH 14), provides connectivity and efficient emergency response between neighborhoods, and distributes traffic throughout the area. The concept plan shows Robinson Drive extending to the east lot line; however, due a large wetland complex, connection to 4th Avenue at this location may not be viable and it may have to shift north or south. An additional east/west connection to 4th Avenue shall be made at Carl Street. The proposed development shall provide a road connection south to Carl Street and the 2 cul de sacs shall be connected. This would be similar transportation design practices implemented with the Saddle Club development and the connection of Fox Road and the St. Clair Estates connection to Hokah Drive and Sioux Lane. The Carl Street connection is also supported by Lino Lakes Public Safety -Police Division and Fire Division in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response to the entire area. This street connection is required by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.096 LAND REQUIREMENTS. (2) Proposed subdivisions shall be coordinated with surrounding properties and/or neighborhoods so that the city as a whole may develop efficiently and harmoniously. § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. 7 The access road onto CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) shall be evaluated by Anoka County. Staff Comments: oo Local road right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60 ft. wide. oo Cul de sacs shall not exceed 500 ft. in length and bulbs shall meet City standards. oo Additional road right of way along CSAH 14 and CR 53 may be required. oo Access and connection to Carl Street shall be evaluated. oo A traffic study shall be required. oo Anoka County Highway Department is in receipt of the concept plan and will provide additional comments on the development. oo More trails shall be incorporated throughout the development. oo Noise impacts shall be evaluated as part of an EAW. Easements Staff Comments: oo Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. oo Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. oo Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The concept plan shows several stormwater management facilities and ponds throughout the development. A stronger multi -purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space shall be incorporated into the development. Pedestrian ways/sidewalks/trails shall be included throughout the development, to CSAH 14 (Main Street) and to CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) to provide connectivity throughout the development. The existing trail in Century Farm North near 7836 Century Trail shall extend to the east into the development. Deeper rear yard buffers along the stormwater ponds and lake shall be incorporated. Utilities Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub -district 2I). Flow is collected southward to MCES Meter M211 and Gravity Interceptor 8361 along North Road which passes southwest through Circle Pines. The site is located in Utility Staging Area IA (2018-2025) and 113 (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the one (1) parcel from Stage 113 (2025-2030) to Stage IA (2018-2025) Municipal water and sanitary sewer utilities to serve the development exist along Robinson Drive and Century Trail in Century Trail North. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the City's 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan, this development is within the Century Farm and Behm's Park service areas. A trail to Robinson Drive currently exists between proposed Lots 30-31. A greenway corridor is required along the north -south ditch and an east -west section. The City's Park Plan and Central Anoka County Regional Trail Plan require a regional trail along the south side of CSAH 14 (Main Street). This shall be provided. A proposed on -street bike route is shown along CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue). The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Any required trail construction costs will be credited from the total payment in lieu. A stronger multi -purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space shall be incorporated into the development especially leading into Century Farm park. Pedestrian ways/sidewalks/trails shall be included throughout the development, at a midway point to CSAH 14 (Main Street) and to CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) to provide connectivity throughout the development. The existing trail in Century Farm North near 7836 Century Trail shall extend to the east into the development. A regional trail shall be constructed along the south side of CSAH 14 (Main St). Tree Preservation and Landscaping A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted. Additional landscaping may be required as a condition of the PUD. Environmental Review Record An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required. The threshold computation of unattached units (263) and attached units (444) is greater than one (1). Wetlands Wetlands appear exist along the ditches. A wetland delineation report is required with a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat submittal. Wetland buffers consistent with RCWD regulations (50 ft wide average, monument signs etc.) may be required as part of the PUD. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain on a large portion of the site. Floodplain management shall be incorporated into the overall design of the site. 0 Staff Comments: oo A Base Flood Elevation is required to be determined, using detailed methods acceptable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). oo A FEMA CLOMR and LOMR are required for this site. oo The CLOMR shall be submitted with a PUD Development Stage Plan application. Shoreland District The subject property is not located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Anoka County Highway Department provided comments in the attached email. Anoka County Parks Department recommends the regional trail along the south side of Main Street be installed with this development. Lino Lakes Public Safety The Police Division supports connection of Carl Street, recommends a traffic study, turn lanes and reduction in speed limit along Main Street. The Fire Division also supports the Carl Street connection to improve response times to the entire area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the PUD concept plan on January 4, 2022. General comments included the need for multi -functional greenway system, wider wetland buffers and diverse mix of native plants. City Engineer The City Engineer provided comments in the attached letter dated January 5, 2022. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the PUD concept plan on January 12, 2022. The following are some bullet points of their discussion: oo Include more larger single family home lots oo Provide more trail connectivity and public access to lakes, ponds and open space oo Landscape screening and buffers are required oo Need for more affordable housing oo High end of the density range 10 oo What is the City getting out of the PUD? oo Support for trail along Main Street and Sunset Avenue oo Should there be a commercial component? PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat The City's review and comments on the concept plan's relation to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. A land use application for PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be required. The developer should have a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the City Council. 1. Should a Master Plan for the Main Street Corridor between Sunset Avenue and 4th Avenue be required? 2. Thoughts on PUD flexibility for lot widths, lot sizes, and setbacks? ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. 2040 Future Land Use Plan Map 3. 2006 Robinson Lakes Concept Plan 4. 2021 Concept Plan Submittal Narrative 5. ALTA Survey 6. Concept Plan 7. Concept Plan -Graphic Rendering 8. Concept Plan and Surrounding Area 9. WSB City Engineer Memo dated January 5, 2022 10. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated January 5, 2022 11. Anoka County Highway Department email dated January 7, 2022 11 Robinson Property -Site Location &Aerial Map nQ 41, dfl . nom _00 4 It I -4 4, 4 pfy 4,N/ . . . . . . . .... !F AW k ry AL 44*1 Parcels A • CITY 0 F LN0OL 0 KES A -A JO 7 .ADM ir I i n = 600 ft N A December 21, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink vvsb Robinson Property-2040 Land Use Plan C .'Q Q7 m 125th Ave NE r 1241h Ln NE Ll' m c _P.1 z x m � z 4n m a Aft Ln a m E Robinson Dr 123rd Ln n w r z m b�$ a c a N � �= r° Q � ar Carl St Sherwood Ln 121 st Ave N E Greenwood Ln A• GjrQ � prairie View PI f ¢ Century �t WSB & Associates �r C 1 T F D F LINOLAKES Parcels Land Use - 2040 Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Residential / Commercial Office Residential Signature Gateway District Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial Civic and Institutional Parks and Open Space Private Airfield 1 i n = 600 ft N A December 21, 2021 Map Powered By DataLink WSb ..�,. •; ",i. t 4 L F �. . ,u .�� ;-� e .' °. � WETLAND WF. TLAND ;�t � W ' 6' Y. j, � a �� v �)�� u�'::, • E \ WE Y WE (LAND ' �1 !-1 SINGLE FAMILY �. LAKE SINGLE FAMILY LAKE MULn FAMILY oft 1 ;l .Y MULn t� FAMILY INGLE AMILY SINGLE FAMILY POND •, �'',. SINGLE ,u,, _ � F^AHK FAMILY -�. a �,,,.,-' :' !. I' SINGLE `'� FARK 31NGLE - FAMILY "AMILY - FAMILY 1 r S LAKE LAKE SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY �.,-� r �, � _ I v i eC I`G�'/4� ' I t �� ti L � �. a y ti', i '>` � �� I �� i, , 1'I{I I .. di 1 � 3-i-��rL* k'�—I I : I*�' GROSS AREA: f 80 ACRES L,,. �' � PROPOSED ZONING: PUD �`, PROPOSED LAND USE: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ''j F PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS: t1,300-1,700 I PROPOSED GROSS DENSITY: 2-3 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED NET DENSITY: 3-4 UNITS/ACRE ,I L ��: ',_, "I OPEN SPACE DATA: �, . PROPOSED UPLAND OPEN SPACE/PARK AREAS: f65-75 ACRES��i IL.,, . I PROPOSED PONDING: t725-140 ACRES ' n ( '�, LARGE ERISnNG WETLAND AREAS: t20 ACRES ;j^• �. CLUBHOUSE AND NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION AREA: f4 ACRES . '� TOTAL OPEN SPACE: f215-240 ACRES (32-35% OF SITE) I I •� " ,d PROPOSED TRAIL• t7 MILES I:7 ` � R ' . _ _ r Arnv� AnuLr � 1+''�- �nvE A ULT ' POND FUND MULn FAMILY - � - F'APIc -�, �C � POND 1 { - `, ,. I . t,.r I I , n 17 C �.I _ _ I I, .,. AC .. ADULT 1 ? I - ��� � ��'. �_c i I Fn ,r 1- ,•� �I, �� (�:. I! � it , 4' I �� I. '�. , I I � �, +' �a i ! tl, I" I�. �� 7.. . CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE ROBINSON PROPERTY Lino Lakes, Minnesota December 13, 2021 -- a�ill, 1--/ it-�4 �2 .., 27 z� 9 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 1 of 13 Integrate Properties, LLC is pleased to submit the Concept Plan for the Robinson Property south of Main Street. We are interested in obtaining feedback and direction from the Commissions, City Council and City Staff as the development of this property will leave a legacy in the community. Included in this narrative are key items from the City Checklist. DEVELOPMENT TEAM / CONSULTANTS: Attorney: Mr. Jeremy Duehr Fredikson & Byron, PA 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Surveyor: Mr. Peter Goers, PLS Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Land Planning: Mr. Mark Rausch, PE Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Engineering: Mr. Mark Rausch, PE Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Wetlands: Mr. Mark Kjolhaug, PWS Kjolhaug Environmental Services, Inc. 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130 Orono, MN 55331 Environmental: Mr. Kevin Hoffinan Braun Intertec 11001 Hampshire Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55438 Geotechnical: Mr. Henry Vloo, PE Braun Intertec 11001 Hampshire Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55438 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 2 of 13 PROPERTY / DEVELOPMENT SITE INFORMATION: Legal Description: Parcel A The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, EXCEPT the south 250 of the west 250 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Parcel B The south 250 of the west 250 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Address: 310 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN. PIDs: Parcel A: 073122220001 = 37.5115 acres 073122210001 = 39.8440 acres 073122120001 = 39.7865 acres 073122130001 = 39.9127 acres Total Acres "A": = 157.055 acres Parcel B: 073122220002 = 1.4356 acres Total Acres. 158.4903 ac CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 3 of 13 Existing Site Description The development site is currently in use as part of the Robinson Landscaping, Inc. sod farm agricultural use. The property also includes a residence and buildings used for operation of the sod farm. The site topography is very flat with multiple ditches to provide drainage and an irrigation source. The property is bound by Main Street (CSAH 14) to the north and Sunset Ave (CR 53) to the west. We have been working with the Anoka County Highway Department regarding their right of way needs for each roadway and to request preliminary feedback on potential roadway access points. The County has indicated roadway access will be made available to the property, and provided a general guideline for locating new access points as depicted on the Concept Plan. Additionally, the County has requested 75-feet of Right of Way dedication from the centerline of Main Street and 60-feet of Right of Way dedication from the centerline of Sunset Avenue; both requests are depicted on the Concept Plan. Other roadway access points have been provided to the property through the Century Farm development to the south at Cardinal Way, Robinson Drive, and Century Trail. Additionally, a pedestrian trail has been stubbed to the property from Century Farm Addition to the south, just west of the Cardinal Way street connection. Adequate public water and sanitary sewer is available to the property from Century Farm development to the south at Cardinal Way, Robinson Drive, and Century Trail. The development site has been historically used for agriculture and currently has no significant tree removal required to construct the development. Braun Intertec performed a Geotechnical Evaluation Report, dated November 29, 2021, on the site. The results are summarized below, with peat levels ranging from 0.5-feet to 8-feet in depth and water levels ranging from 4-feet to 9-feet in depth. Table 1. Subsurface Profile Summary. Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration ftesistaroms Commentaryand Details Mostly peat with lesser amounts of organic clay, lean Topsoil j clay, and silty sand. Swamp PT, QL, CL, NIA Thicknesses at boring locations ranged from alaout SM 112 to 81/2 feet, Deposits Black and dark brown in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist_ ■ Mixture of poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand Alluvial 5Pr SP-SK 2 to 14 BPF with silt, silty sandy sandy silt, and siIt- Deposits SM, ML Generally brawn to gray in color. ■ Moisture condition generally moist to wet_ "Abbrevlations deflned in the attached Descriptive Term Inology of Sall sheet. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 4 of 13 Land use and Zoning Designations tions The development property is guided for several different land uses within the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan including: • Low Density Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential • Planned Residential/Commercial. Land uses for properties adjacent to the site are guided with consistent uses: • To West: City limits with Blaine (Lino Lakes land use N/A) • To North: Includes a similar combination of all 4 land uses on the development site • To East: High density residential and low density residential • To South: Medium density residential and low density residential. The development site is currently zoned entirely as R - Rural. The requested zoning for the site will establish a PUD zoning for the entire development site, compatible and consistent with the City's goals and objectives for the property. The zoning for the properties abutting the site include: • To West: City limits with Blaine (Lino Lakes zoning N/A) • To North: R - Rural • To East: R - Rural • To South: PUD (mixed residential neighborhood) DEVELOPMENT FEEDBACK REQUEST The applicant proposes to provide the City of Lino Lakes with a residential development that includes a variety of housing options catering to all spectrums of consumers from millennials to empty nesters to satisfy the market demand. These housing styles will be grouped together within clusters or pods as follows: • 50-feet wide single-family lots • 55-feet wide single-family lots • 65-feet wide single-family lots • Row style townhomes • Back-to-back style townhomes • Structured multi -family housing The development will create substantial ponding and lake areas that will be an amenity to the various housing types proposed within the project. The main County ditch system will be preserved and protected while the newly created ponding and lakes will provide for stormwater management goals and infrastructure improvements to the adjacent offsite roadway. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 5 of 13 The allowable density range for the property is depicted below in the table by both Property ID and by the Comprehensive Plan Guidance. The density ranges from a minimum of 531 units to a maximum of 764 units at full development. R=NSON FARM: 501-11TH OF MAIN STREET ZPQQCWlPr@h*nSiVr Plan • ig-nd 11$* DMSkVAl 210S 0RGANIIFV 8Y Pi0 PID 11511apAl Zoning Comp Plan GI Acres NekAaea Ili}wo Uniks per Acne Allowed A Un& Low High 1pw High 07-31-22-22 0001 1 A, Rural Law Density Res 37.5115 32 44SI -.5 3.0 -.2 17 p7-31-22 Z1 1 d R Rarst n+6edWm oenso lies 25L76 9.9610 9.9795 c.,:} r.i; 54 2 R. Rural High Density Res SCOA 19.9220 17-9571 6.0 v C :;R 144 .1 R, RuriI Plpaneok4g1(:amm (2596f 9.9610 $.)784 ;{.r} 67-31-22.1Z•0001 7 IC Rural Medium DenSO Res (25%1 9.9466 8.8574 C ? 53 o Ik Purse High dense 11es -W%) 19.8933 17-7149 f,,:} ;; r, 142 5 R. Rural Planned ties j Comm 25961 9,9466 8,874 S : 0 ] 89 -31-22-i3-0001 d R, Rural Low Density Res 39-9127 32-0610 LU % NIFF OFFAL 257,11W 13SJ4499 431 764 GROSS DENSITY 3 , 4,9 NET DENSITY 3y 5.6 aRCAN=8YC126980#,A IVEPL N GLJOVANCE pPlan GFossAcres Net Acres Allowed Units per Acre Allowed it Units Low High Low High Law Density Res 77.4 64.5 1.b 3-0 1.03 194 MCdiumPCnSikxRcs 19,9 17.8 4,0 6.13 71 1137 High Density Res 31.8 35-7 6.0 $_U 214 285 PIa nned Rus I Comm 1.9,9 17,8 6,0 10.0 143 178 11 AL 157.1 135A 531 7ti+1 GROSS DENSITY 3 a {, NET DENSITY R9 5.E DMft r moos arc boWd upon Wet Ao" #Grass ACIP5 - ROW - WE E1045) The proposed Concept Plan provides for a total of 710 units on the site, which falls within the density range for the property provided in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Concept Plan provides for the following diversification of housing types totaling the 710 units: • 65-feet wide Single Family Lots: 98 • 55-feet wide Single Family Lots: 82 • 50-feet wide Single Family Lots: 83 • Row Townhomes: 100 • Rowhomes (Back to Back & Row): 64 • Structured Multi Family Housing: 280 • TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: 710 UNITS We believe the proposed development plan is consistent with the City of Lino Lakes goals for the property. The following is a summary of primary project elements currently proposed: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 6 of 13 • 710 new housing units with a variety of types, sizes and affordability. • Infrastructure improvements to adjacent County roadways. • Public right of way dedication for Main St (CSAH 14) and Sunset Ave (CR 53). • Preservation of most of the onsite ditch/wetland areas. • Wetland buffer creation in accordance with requirements where necessary. • HOA maintained community. • Extension of sanitary sewer and water main for future development to the north and east. • Installation of stormwater management facilities to provide volume control, water quality and rate control for runoff from the new roadway surfaces prior to discharge. • Extension of public trailways and sidewalks for pedestrian connectivity. • Extension of collector roadways for regional transportation use. • Comprehensive development landscape plan with perimeter fencing and landscaping. HOUSING TYPE EXAMPLES 50' wide sinizle-family lots CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 7 of 13 55' wide single-family lots: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 8 of 13 65' wide single-family lots: CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 9 of 13 Row style townhomes: 11 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL ROBINSON PROPERTY -mw-- -*A December 13, 2021 Page 10 of 13 11= ,Il`! �1= F'IV ., -:�._,. `'ram � • _ TIMING/PHASING/STAGING The entire site will be mass graded in one phase to allow for the creation of the storm water ponds and lakes. Development of the neighborhood clusters with utilities and streets will be completed in multiple phases based on market demand. Mass grading is anticipated to begin Winter 2023 with the first phase of utilities and streets completed by July 2023. Home construction is anticipated to begin July 2023 with a full build out of the community taking place over four to five years. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully requests feedback and direction on the concept plan and planned unit development from the Commissions, City Council and City Staff. We believe the concept plan will allow for a residential land use consistent with City's goals and objectives for this area and create a community that will enhance Lino Lakes and the surrounding area. CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL December 13, 2021 ROBINSON PROPERTY Page 13 of 13 ou -Q°- ou -ter- err- -O UU N I%4 CD COR. SEC 7, n0 I T. 3/, R. 22 n0 as . as8.o _ n0®- n0 - - �897 897.9 _- 899.0 �98.9 - - - XBW6- =n0 n0 n0 ' - - -- 988 - 9.4 - 9.2 L 899.3 899.4 / �900.3 �900.2 �y00.1- �900.1 90o.0 - - - - -- - I I - PUBLIC ° 11 598.53 BIT SURFACE 900 S -G �901.2�9012 �901- -G _ 00.9 -- - - - - - MAIN STREET C.S.A.H. NO. 14 0 c9 3 896.9 F § T' 48" RCP BIT SURFACE I ti NVVCOR. SEC 7 T N 900 - - - 895. 894.8 95.2 895.1 95.1 4 3 F �'R` 595.OF0 FO FO 895.8 - I I 1917 g I 894-r--�� R. 22 o �900.2 - 0 �(1f�F0 894.9 FO FO FO FOR FO u X�94.9 jwn*7 as4.5 - gg�` • I r900.6 P`G - - - - F asa.a -\-894 8 - Xssa q �� ay��� 30"_CMP I I C� .7 �900.8 - -- r900.8 �900.8 - - Fo FO 898 FO9 895.0 a 8sa.7 ass.1 may . �"' - L �E l/4OF 896 - _ 3 % � I S9�. M v-89�.877.3 Nm-5 897.3 ?CMP X897.z X� %'o 89� �(F�� .894` sus X894.8 X894.8 895_I 5. 4F 4. X894.8 8 X894.6 X894.8 X894.8 X894.7 X894.6 X894.6 X895.5 896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.3 X8 C P� I I NV=893.09-Fo FoFo F �ass.3 8 NW l 4 OF EC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 IN 92. 3 ag I co \ ..a�7.6 �ass.z 895.3- - _ - - Sg2.a - asa s - ss.1 N LINE OF W 114 OF THE . 0 - H o fi - __ _-- PL /��4 - - - - - T _ _ _ \ _ - - - - - - �`' ' / 241' CM 4"-CMP_- _N W 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 899 I X896.9 Xa96.9 00 X897.7 - �� X895.5 X895.7 ITCH- 896.0 89� S TRA TT B D L X896.0 X895.�4" 8.1 8 '696.5 INV= 91.33 -891 X89 .2 X4895.8 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.2 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.3 X895.1 X894.9 X894.8 X895.0 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X894.9 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X894.8 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.0 X 5.7 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.5 1 X896.9 X897.1 III-896.0 III - � PER W JI 0 I 1EASEMENT DOC. NO. X895 3 325474 Y896.3 X895 5 X895 8 X896 X896 2 X896 3 X896 1 X895 9 X89 9 8959 X895 7 X895 5 X895 4 X895 5 X895 4 X895 3 X895 3 X895 4 X895 3 X895 4 X895 5 X895 3 X895 2 X895 0 X895I X895 2 X895 2 X895 0 X895 X895 0 X895 3 X895 2 X895 I X895 0 X894 8 X895 0 X895 2 X895 2 X895I X895 4 X895 5 X89 8 X896 2 X896 3 X896 2 X896 X896 2 X896 4 J = 6 896 5 8 5 X 896.8 X 896.8 X 896.9 X 897,81 �I �61 I II X895.2 X895.5 X895.6 X895. X895.9 896.1 X896.2 X896.1 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.1 X894.9 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.9 X896.1 X896 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 896.1 4 $g6 896 N I X895.3 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.0 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X8 6.I 6.0 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X 5.9 I I � I I181 CL 00 5. 1 1 1 z 1 5. Ili W N X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X-895.5 '>(895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.4 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.5 896.0 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 8960' X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 61_0. I LO z o I O ": X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 Xx$ V SA_. X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X 5.9 896.0 X896.1 X896\1 895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.8 �86, C I � -mil � I s . \ ti O O J \ P 5. �43 X895.3 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 XX8s5 895.5 895.6 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.7 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.4 X.6 X895.8 X895.9 X895.9 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 @86 1 o, s Q I I NO BUILDINGS OBSERVED `\ Z c� 39�, III O X895.1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.7 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.6 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.8 X895.8 896.0 X895.8 X895.4 X895.2 X\895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 89 X895.8 X 9519 \ I' W \ w " I Z �5.6 I Z X895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.7 X895.8 X895.6 X895.4 X895.3 X895.3 X�95.3 X895.4 X895.4 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.1 X895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X894.9 X895.0 X895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X8 .0 X8 .1 X895.9 X895.4 X894.9 • X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.7 X8 5.8 X8'I _Ias4.7 1 _I 896 - < U) 8/ 897.4 �o I I X895.0 X895.2 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.4 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.8 X895.4 X-895.'f (895.2 X895.2 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.2 X895.4 ( v I X895.4 ��9_,S�EL X894.8 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.5 X895.8 X896.0 X896.2 X896.1 X895.9 X895.1/ X894.6 X894.5 X894.4 X894.8 X895.0 X895.2 X895.4 X895.5 X895.3 X895.3 K?{ - X89 .5 i / � d30"_CMP a%6 9 I2 ( 894.9 NV=892.44i X895.0 895.1 895.0 X894.9 894.8 894.9 895.1 895.3 895.3 895.3 895.2 5.1 895.0 895.1 895.0 594.7 894.6 894.5 894.3 894.4 894.4 X894.6 X894.8 895.0 895.1 895.1 894.6 894. 894.3 894.7 895.0 895.E 895.9 896.0 8 896.2 895.9 1 8 5.6 X895.1 894.5 943 893.9 894.3 894.4 �894.7 - 895.1 _ X X X X X X X X X� X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DII� X X I \ �895.5 _ 895.7 _ - - - - ----- --- _ g s _ ss.'s 1 o I 894.6 �894.3 ---= r895.0 =--- ---- ---\ -- --- 892.2� ----- ---- - ---- - -894.6 900.9 I - 894.7 - - - _ - - - - - - -_-_ `895.1 1 U1 1 24°_RCP 894.1� DITCH 894.2 - - - 93.8 - - - - r - - --_8s2.5 -89L4 - - - - - - - -�958 - - �894.6 893.9 I III i IN892.60 X894.8 X894.8 X894.7 X894.6 X894.8 X895.1 X895.1 X895.2 X895.21 x8 5.1 �894.6 X894.8 9 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 895.4 X 5.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X885.6 I X895.6 X895.5 X895.1 X894.8 X894.4 X894.4 X894.4 X894.8 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.3 L 8 9 4.7 _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I `` I II ii 894.9 - 894.5- - 894.4- - --8 - - - - - - - - - 894.9 �894.4 L-894.3 L894.6 894.6 1 I )3. 43 895.6J �894.9 L894.8 894.6 894.5 OVER DITCH I� R``4"_f-R-895.2 X895.1 X895.0 X895.0 X895.1 X894.8 X895.1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X894.6 X894.6 X894.8 X894.6 X894.4 X894.4 X894.4 X894.5 X894.8 X895.0 X895.2 X895.2 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.5 X895.8 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895X895.7 X895.6 X895.5 X895.2 X895.1 X894.9 X894.9 X894.9 X895.0 X895.3 X895.5 95.9 X89. X896. X896.4 6. U I 1895.3INV=892.51 �I \ NI CV)X 9 °895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.2 `, <895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.0 X895.1 X895.0 X895.1 X895.3 X895.3 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.1 X895.3 X895.5 X895.6 X895.5 X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.4 X895.6 X895.8 X895.5 X895.4 X895.4 X895.6 896.0 X896.3 X896.4 XBoa z \l aoa s 96. ~ 95.9 < m I I asz8 NO BUILD S OI R \ I 0 8 .1 II 891. X89 7 Xass.a Xass.7 X897.1 X897s 894.9 892.0 X895.0 I X895.6 X896.2 X896.8 Xas7.1 001 rn rn alyol 00 N 8.71 I X 896.3 _--_><�86.0 X896.2 X896.9 896.2 X896.7 X896.7 X896.7 Xsss. X896.2 X896.6 X896.9 X896.9 X89 5.7 191.9 X 896.4 X896.6 X897.2 X896.8 X8 I� I X896.2 X896.6 X897.0 X897.0 X I X896.2 „ X896.6 X897.0 30 CMP X897.0 ; INV=891- _ jr MP X896.3 X 896.7 X897.0 X896.9 X 896.4 X 896.7 X896.8 g I I N X895.2 X895. X896.2 8 I I X 896.3 1 X895.4 X895.5 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 \V/� 95.Y X895.6 X895.6 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.8 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895. X895.8 X895.6 X895.3 X895.4 X895.3 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 X89 7 X895.7 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X89. X896.1 X896.3 X896.2 896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.3 X896.4 X896.4 X896.3 X896.6 I gg 894.9 X895.4 X895.6 1 O 3 p I %F •` I 89.9 X 895.7 M Y� .5 \ ` , 896.9 I I Q I93.0 90�� q I 1 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 ��95X I .7 X895.8 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.8 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.9 I�8?5.6 X895.8 95.9 X895.8 X895.6 X895.7 X8 5.9 X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.6 Q I 96.6 I X894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X895.7 II I III - 896 X895.1 X895.5 X895.7 X895.8895.9 X895.9 896.0 896.1 X896.4 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.3 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.4 X896.5 X896.3 X896.1 896.0 X895.9 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896. X895.9 I X895.9 X89 9 X896.2 X896.2 X89 2 X895.9 X895.9 X895. X896.3 X896.5 X896.7 X896.8 X896.9 X896.9 X896.8 X896.8 X896.8 X896.8 X896.5 ? I 96.5 900.4 I \� I r\ I J 3892. I 1394.5 r \ 1 \ $�2.8 92.;1�895.3 I I S. X896.1 X896.2 II X896. _ X895.0 X895.4 X895.9, X896.0 896.1 X896.3 X896.3 X896.3 X896.6 X896.9 X897.1 X896.9 X896.7 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.3 X896.1 X895.9 X895.9 X895.9 X89 .0 X896.2 X896.4 X896.4 X896.4<' X896.3 X89 0 X896.0 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.8 X896.9 X897.0 X897.1 X897.1 X897.1 X897.0 X897.0 X897.0 X896.8 >1896.6 1 11 00 9 0.6 4 89f I l \ \ c\�� \i X 895 X 896.3 X896.3 X 89( I I X895.4 X1195.7 c 896.2 X1196.6 X896.7 X896.7 X1196.8 X897.2 X897.1 X1197.1 X897.2 X897.2 X897.1 X897,0 X1197.0 X1196.9 X896.8 X1196.7 X896.4 X8 .I X 896.0 X X896. 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X89 0 X895.9 X89 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.3 X896.4 X896.7 X897.0 X897.1 X897.2 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.3 X897.2 X896.8 I 895.9 _ 895.8 .X896.1 X8963 X8S I I � 896 V II X895.7 896.1 X897.1 898.0 X898.2 .SgSX898.3 /\898. X897.5 X897.1 X897.1 X897.3 X897.5 X897.5 X897.3 X897.1 X896.9 X896.5 X .I 896f X X896.0 X895.9 X895. X896.0 896.0 X896.2 896.0 0 896.1 89 X895.9 X895.8 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896.6 X896.9 X897.2 X897.3 X897.4 X897.4 X897.6 X897.8 X897.7 X897.5 X896.9 1 V I 95.0 N8 'n611 4 25D<I4 898.1 X899.1 X899.1 X898.7 X898.9 X89 .4 X897.3 X896.9N X896.8 X897.1 X897.4 X897.4 X897.2 X897.0 X896.6 X896.2 896.0 X896.0 X895.9 X895.9 896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X 96.1 X895.8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.1 X896.1 X896.3 X896.8 X897.2 X897.4 X897.8 898.0 X 98.0 X897.8 9 .9 897.9 X897.1 LQ N 33L 9 s 8sa.7 250 i 897.7 ---- - --------� X898.5 X897.7 X896.9 X866.8� X896.8 X897.0 X897.2 X897.1 X896.8 X896.5 X8 .2 X 6.0 X89. X896.0 X895.9 X 6.0 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 X896.0 X896.1 896.0 X895.8 X895.7 X895.5 X895.4 X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X 95.9 X896.1 X896.3 X896.9 X897.4 X897.8 X898.1 X898.3 898.0 X8 .0 X898.1 898.0 X897 1.8 _ 898.s 1 s 8.6 8 897.6 ty- 9 I. 99.7 1 h O 99 8.0 97. I� 896 896 / 00. I 90 .9 GARAG I P 898.5 98.1 97.2 � � I O X 1 ) ,,,,I, O N X896.7 X8W.7 X896.8 X897.0 X896.9 X896.9 X896.7 X896.4 896.0 XS .8 X896.1 896.0 X895.8 X895.9 X895.9 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895.7 X895.7 X895.8 X895.8 X895.4 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.3 X895.4 X895.7 XS .0 X896.5 X897.0 X897.4 97.9 X898.2 X898.3 X898.3 X898.2 898.0 X897.8 X 7. Q6 i�9A U 00.9�--1-- 8. 897.0 �I O I O CE cgu RIM=_902._32 I N s� �I Xso0.7� Xas9.a � En 9 I. O1901.3 ---I -� -DECK N lL Mw O c 93.1 900.7 .J i (Vw Z INV 5=897.62 902. 90 O w N X896.8 X8�50 X896.4 X.8W.4 X896.6 X896.6 X896.5 X8 X895.7 X895.5 �jP.9 XU5,Y X89' .5 X89 .2 X895.0 X894.9 X894.9 X895.2 X895.6 X895.4 X894.9 X895.0 X895.0 895.1 895.1 895.1 35.1 L/ 895.3 T 9'5".� / 89 T 97.1 15° PVC SAN UB W - EM 989 3.4 900.X gg, 901.1 900.6 9 0.1 w J U Z M 03 / H S96 _ - - - -_-r 7_-F - - 91 9 3.4 901.0 Y � L3 EM -RETAIN II�OaNhPX gb X X X Xa x X897.6 898.0 X898.3 X898.5 N 80X4i 897.IXa 9T.7 1 GM o X 0 00 � � Zd C.L. FENCE 0.3' N NW l 4 OF SE 7, T. 3/, R. 22 - - � _ s2.1 _ ❑ w w v Z w ao 1,, 11, P � �' a j OF PROP. LINE s 4.g C.L. FENCE 0.4' S C.L. FENCE 0.3' N _C.L. FENCE ON �sss_z / - - _ _ - s RETAINING_ @❑ SEPTIC pZ 898. Zd w� -- N- X o0.5 as z o J a d a J �e9s.o C.L. FENCE 1.5' S 894.c - - -0 LINE - _ -OF-PROP, LINE �__ _ - = P&02 DITCH - 894 9 895.6 2.� G �ou 0 aX896.7 X8 � X�es.l X896.3 CX09FENCE 0.3' S 89�.4 95.4- _ __ U 0. - _ .- -894,--i�PR-OP - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - 0 89Y 3- gg66 _894 1.9 O U d J uJ O L - . SINE ---. - - - - �- s.l 2 O _ O) CONC. �A^TIO 12 8 6gg�.0- ->� -1-T - - - - 89 --`IQ'9Dt�- - 900 y6 S=8EiZ •5 .7 902. I. d Xsl2. /-8.9' N Of'0 fx 6xE GARDEN 00- 89 � �X -� 97.9 898 - - - - - - - rr - �E g 9 �go3. PROPXLINE \ a .2 _ - - r - N o- - N N\ 900 0 2.0 902.9 s" Pv - -- 9 29 .2 1 901.7 `-901.4 x 4.9 >16.14 �895.1 6.26`� Q� 99. _ _ - -- I� I� l� I� O rh O 94.8 95.7 903.1 D S 12�DI S 90 898.. - - 90o Z - a 5. z 1,i8°06'3 25 0.67 s 4 \ • p0 - -- -( - L2 - a __12 "_FES ` _ N J \ I \ L894.8 INV E-880.48 D CE I 902.2 903.1 L6 w 901.0 a 7902.1 J WV=884. 24� I JI J _ I N Q 894.8 \ RIM=90313 - IT SURD _ /-- _ N � z w d � NV=898.10 n I _ I� � I J I J - \ \ INV W=880.58 O d ( N RIM-903.03 z I- J 0 .4 L------- .psol.a d g o. X s.l - \ n.0 J N - \ EDGE OF WATER RI_M=902.74J = 901.9 <h V 3 . TNH=904.09 - INV=880.22 NV=898.53 a __ELEVATION=894.8 2" RCP s 2 s 2 p n J J J u I AS OF 10-12-21 BUILDING � J va J CL J - I / NIV=880.37 -CORNER 1.6' S w I I I I I 901.7- 19 w�` RIM=900 92 1III X896.1 X896.3 X896.2 XI X896.6 X896.7 X896.5 892.4 k 896.6 X897.0 X896.7 X896.5 SW COR. OF THE NW X/a�4.3 OF THE NE 114 OF 93.4 SEO 7, XT896,3/, R.X2S�s.8 X896.2 X896.2 X89 5" PVC SAN STU INV=880.49 891.8 X895.7 X895.7 Xe r.o X895.7 X895.5 X OF PROP. LINE o _ _ NV N=897.52 \ m 60 NV E-897.36 CARDINAL WAY ROBINSON DR (PUBLIC) / 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED n r r -I- l i\ n (PUBLIC) \ n -I r r- n r n n i\ r -I- I� -I- I /\ I I I I I I I \ 12 10 2021: PARCEL B ADDED Y F-- /-\ I F-< I �� F% i ��I �-\ l PROPERTY R•P DESCRIPTION I Parcel A 1. The basis of bearings based on Anoka County Coordinate System NAD (96 Adj.) O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 0 WELL G GAS The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. • FOUND IRON MONUMENT EM ELECTRIC METER D SANITARY SEWER 2. All distances are in feet. AND A SET NAIL 44110 GM GAS METER >> STORM SEWER 3. The property has vehicular access to Main Street via gravel drives. Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. EM ELECTRIC METER I WATERMAIN The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, EXCEPT the south 250 of © COMMUNICATION BOX FH1 HAND HOLE `0 FIBER OPTIC the west 250 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. 4. The locations of existing public utilities on or serving the property are depicted based on Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 212651615, 212651616, 212651617 & 212651618, available city maps, records and observed evidence OS SANITARY MANHOLE ❑F FIBER OPTIC BOX ou OVERHEAD UTILITY AND locations. Lacking excavation, underground utility locations may not be exact. Verify critical utilities prior to construction ❑ CATCH BASIN O SANITARY CLEAN OUT E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. or design. -& POWER POLE ) SIGN -X-X- FENCE AND 5. Benchmark: Anoka County benchmark no. 2009, located in the NE 1/4 of Sec. 7, T. 31, R. 22, on the SW corner of C-- GUY WIRE EM ELECTRIC METER GRAVEL Main Street (C.S.A.H. No. 14) and Fourth Ave located on the NE corner of the fiberglass pad for the electric box and GUY POLE a CULVERT - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. has an elevation of 902.805 ft (NAVD 88). LIGHT POLE MAILBOX EDGE OF TREES Abstract Property 6. The area of the above described property is: X WATER VALVE ® BOLLARD :; '•• ; CONCRETE 6,903,837 square feet or 158.490 acres -6- FIRE HYDRANT - - TOP OF DITCH Parcel B Area minue R/W: 6,627,639 square feet or 152.150 acres The south 250 of the west 250 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. 1 NY 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET Q N N SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS LEGEND O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 • FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET NAIL 44110 Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. © COMMUNICATION BOX �S SANITARY MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN POWER POLE GUY WIRE GUY POLE LIGHT POLE X WATER VALVE � FIRE HYDRANT WELL EM ELECTRIC METER GM GAS METER EM ELECTRIC METER 0 HAND HOLE 0 FIBER OPTIC BOX O SANITARY CLEAN OUT ) SIGN FE -ml ELECTRIC METER a CULVERT F�-1 MAILBOX ® BOLLARD GAS D SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER WATERMAIN F0 FIBER OPTIC ou OVERHEAD UTILITY E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -X-X- FENCE GRAVEL - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH EDGE OF TREES CONCRETE - TOP OF DITCH o� ou ou R. SEC 7, � 0u Ou 31, R. 22' - - - - - 10'59"W 1307.90 - BIT SURFACE 902 �14 • - .9 " 148" RCP ,...., - - - -�NO 07-- ou - -� NE COR. OF THE NW -___ 18" CMP �11 14 OF THE N 114 OF_ - vv=S9s.is 902.5 - - - - - o o SEC 7, T. Lj- 0OA• 902.s Ls - I " CMP - 00 �-O FACE o 902.3 902.47 INV=897. 902. so2a- 902.5 t5lCESS902'2rs02.31 CCESS902 yo18"-CMp--- 020 -� INV=896.04 S V .4_ T ry r�-__._ ��___._ - T•a -ice.... 897.1 X896.4n .W03.1 X I5MP 904� PL 4 E FO 96.6 Xa96.7 896.7 SIGN- E 00.1 INV=89 .98 \I0' GRAVEL SURFACE 901.5 1 16.9 F § I 1. \ a ass.7 ass I 894-� soo.o o / ;�so2. 01.7 15.8 91 7 1 894 _ 896 p�0� 2s X899.1 X9oo. 2'� 902_ •X49 .7-X 1 I as s $ - - - 7 C- I� HF l�4 0 X 7'X soa4s so3.7 s .3 2.0rg 01. MP 0II MP I 2 �• ,\ =-- 899.2 901.0 90 .6905.E X9 I. X899.0 897' AS TRAVELED) NE l/4 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 Ssss CO C. STORA E BINS i I 1 �9.=89h 97.3. Xa97.3 X X 897.3 F EL 19 903.7 1 899.1 w z ry O i I V=89 7 ``S� CMP_ 897.2 XS 8.2 X X896.9 I I 27 6� 96.3 8 _ C P/ 1 X896.5 X897.6 X898.3 STO AGE- 01 8 OFFIC 903.1� X 900. V - R0 .3 X_ INV=893.09 I I X Z o O INV= 92. 3 89 1 00 899.4 900.9J _ - RE PROPA E s'7+ so$.o 0 ANK 90 9 ridO.3 899 00 901.� m I TA K O903.7 0 .4 Cam X I. 596.9 _ X 9 2.5 _ 57.0 X896.9 96.4 896.5 X897.0 898.0 I GRAV L SURFACE 899.2 X903.0 X899.5 X 896.9 X 897.1 X 897.7 1 X 98.1 X896.4 X897.1 X897.6 Xa98.1�a9s.2 9I)_0. 904.0 05.2 X X9oo. q � 905.2 SILO I I W I qp �X 9.Q0.9 302` 902.9 � SE P IC1:3902.5 33. X90 X 0J Z U I 896.5 896.8 X896.9 X 9-�900.8 902.3� 2.9 96.2 X896.4 J �- 8 56 X896.8 X X897.8 X897.0 Z 898.0 898.1 902. w Z 902.3 00 X899.2 99.8 X89 1 896.9 1 8 .1 898.0 X896.5 X897.3 X X X898.2 99.6 X900.9 X -gym O X9o1.s 900 1� I soo.sJ d m X 89: 899.4 9.0 8.8 891. I 900.0 X900.6 902.8 s5s 896.1 � I Xs9 7 Xsss.a Xass.? Xas7.l X897.6 Xsoo.3 so. Xass.s Xa s � I \ 894.9 X897.2 X897.0 899.4 I I 900.2 900.9 X900.8 X900.8 592.0 X896.8 X897.9 X 97.9 X898.8 > X X900.4 X90 .4 ass. 899.7 X898.5 I I 1 1 t ^ 96.5 1 N I Xass.a Xasz1 aszo I Xsoo.s Xso1.o p I � / X900.2 899 898. � '�95.7 X 5.9 X895.0 X895.6 Xa96.2 X901.1 899.E X 90 .4 RR!I�� X 896.7 897.0 X 898.2 7I 899.8 900.0 I' / ` 9 '2 Z D X Xss8.3 Xasa.s X898.s X X soo.s 0 1) 00 00 X901.2 I Q > 892.1 195.76I0• 89�895.7 X896.3 6.0 X896.2 X901.3 < < O Xass.s Xas7.o Xsoo.a X9oo.2 ass.1 I o o w 8.71 1 Xs96.9 1 Xspo.s Xs .2 1 - L w Z N I X897.4 X898.3 X898.6 X898.4 X89 .9 r N � H X898.3 `�8*299.7 X900.3 1 N � V) 395.8 61� 891 I I X901.3� _L X40 7 899. 1 IW X 896.2 XE96.7 X896.7 X896.7 I I X901.1 Z X900.3 = cv IIooXas6.9 X897.0 Xa97.6 Xaszs 900.0 X900.1 OZ � X898.4 X .0 Xa97.eo XasB.l o Xa s X900.3 a o 395.8 @6 X896.6 X896.9 \>(901.7Xso1.7 X896..X896.9 X897.3 ,A X899.7 XSss.s I� Ssss 5.7 X 897.6 X897.5 1 < \ X 900.5 X1$99.80- 1 Z 891.9 X 898.0 3ss.a X sss as ' Xas7s XSszs X898.3 9T X90o.a Xsmo.z Xsoo.s X900.8 � iE899 9s.s X896.4 Xass.s X8s7.2 XSss.B I I - X9 .2 \ 6 X897.0 X897.2 X897.2 X899.1 X897.4 I Xass.o X9 ass. 1 i sss.l 395.7 X8 5.8 X8 6. X897.4 X898.0 97.9 X89 I X9*j-(*30,7 <� Z I ( X,9o1.2 X900.5 X899.6 I X896.2 X896.6 X897.0 X897.0 I �_) X899.6 X899.3 X900.4 � � I 897.4- I 8959 X897.1 X897.0 X897.1 X897.0 I I X899.2 X 99. ass. 1 395.3 X89 .5 I I I 391.8 I I X897.0 X897.4 898.0 X 9�l1""s�(so1.1 Xass.a X900. o o I I I X900.8 X899.9 X900.3 O W d _ 30°_CMP I X896.2 �� X896.6 X897.0 < I X898.1 O ? 898. 898.7 NV=892441 I )0_ C_MPX897.0 X897.0 I O J 895.1 I 1 L ,, INV=891.81 X897.0 X896.8 �( w t X900.3 9 �99.7 X 896.6 I 0 X898.1 X900. X 8@W•c1i�II` P95.9 _ 3 MP X896.9 X897.4 X898.4\ _ 901.3 96.5 9 X900.7 X899.1 X900.8 \�00 X896.3 X896.7 X897.0 X896.9 X896.7 X896.7 3 \\ K i; i X897.7 897.9 X899.3 898.I DO 4 X 896.9 895.7 X896.3 X896.4 X896.9 1 1 X900.6 X899.4 89� 3 X898. X901.11f,901.6 X901.0 900.1 X900.2 1 I 1 II .7 X8 .2 X897.5 I 5'9 X896X896.4 X896.8 X896.9 � � I 898. 896. X896.4 I I X896.6 �I X896.8 X896.3 X896.T \ � � I 900.0 X899.0 N 1 97.7 Xsoo.s Xso2I 898.5 o � X sss.o . � 9j��1.8 X901.2 900.2 896.0 Xsss.z XSss. Xass.2 897.9 X897. 898.4 Cfl1 asa.s co X896 896.3 X896.5 C i X896.3 .6 X896.6 � I I X899.0 �I X896.7 X896.6'TwX896.9 X899.7 X898.5 $ 897.9 X898.2 902.1 X902.6 �g i X9 9ID2.0 X901.0 \ 899.9 897.9 X8 .5 a 896.3 X896.6894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X896.2 X899. 9 (V i � I i � I v y L L J gg 891Q XX897.6 LC)l 896.9 X896.5 X86.7 X897.2 Xa98.9 X897.2 < L L 1 J _ X 898.2 902.1 X902.61 X901.2 897.0 M 9` 2.3 X899.8 0 896.E - T - 896.4 X896.6 96.E I X898. XS 7.6 895.8 - 1 - X894.9 X895.4 X895.6 X896.1 I I X899.4 897.1 X 895.7 X896\6 X896.6 X897.3 I I X8 .2 X897.4 X897.0 I - - I \ , X896.7 897.9 902.2 96.1 �' I 1 � Xso2.2,`,ks�so .2 Xsol.s soo.o �- 896.5 .Z I; g96.5 I II VV j` I 98.1 X897.5 p895.3 I X897.8 X897.2 L 1�6U2.8 I 92.J`X896.1 X896.2 X896.3 X896.3 902 I X897.1 X 9 0 6O 1 0 \ X996.4 X896.7 X896.7 X897.4 OA L 1 - 1 (p 897.8 X 900.8 co 1 I 1 � \, X901.6 �2'0 X902.0 900.1 X897.7 X8s7.1 X897.5 4.1 �89s 8 897.0 896.8 896.E / - I I Xass c I X897.3 X897.2 - 896, 7 894.8 \ X896.3 X896.3 X896.4 �896.3 1 X897.1 97. 7.�r - 894.7 I X896.4 X896.5 897.5 I O• 8 •8 897.6 897.2 X896.8 X896.8 X 897.9 X899.1 `I, �/ (���b 11 1 894.8 Xsoo.*9�($01•7 X901.6 soo.o 1 891.9 I 898.0 I X897.2 Xas7.4 X897.6 `o I 1 895.9 2.9 895.8 X896.3 X896.1 X896.4 X897.���c897. X 97 I I \ X 896.5 X 896.E I \ X 896.9 I X 897.0 X 897.6 X QQ�O. 897.5 X 896.3 0) 1 I 7.8 X898.7 X899.3 � � \ X 899.71 (9390.5 X9 .3 X897.3 > co 896.3 897.9 X897.2 X897.69 897.5 897.3 I 1 Q- 11 X896.1 X X896.2 X896.3 I I Q 894.3 W X 896.5 897.5 � ;897.9 X897.1 l i i X896.4 X896.7 X897.2 X897.7 X897.7 8.2 I I 4� X 97 1 8j- 1 1 X897.8 �Q 11 � � Q 8.2 X898. X 898.3 X897.7 X896.9 X897.2 X897.5 1 897.3 00 0) Q L 1 -1897.7 i 11 X896.6 X896.7 X896.5 I \ Xgq •3 X 1 1 I- 0) Z _- X896.3 X �I 1 O 8892.4 Xa96.5 X896.6 n .896.E X896.9 X897.6 X897.6 X897.4 1 .. %K8�1397.2 X897.8 X897.2 1� W X896.6 X 896.9 X897.5 X896.5 X896.8 X896.8 X 894.5 1 I o � W ;aszs X 9 I o I I X897.0 Xass.7 Xesss 1 1 X896.9 X896.8 ass.s as7.zX 1 1 /�� o Xass.a Xsss.s �p 11 X896.3 X896.7 897.E Q0 X897.1 X897.5 X 1 32 I N SW COR. OF THE NW S LINE OF THE NW l/4FsssTdlE X896.77.o Xs97•z Xas6.? Xass.3 I11 97.62 EM 1 891 I __ � OF THE NE 114 OF / NE 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3/, R. 22 I XSs7.1 MATCH LINE PLS l2'��� I - ��,Aq77 �E 8.X/$"9�3 / I / 393.4/ g93.4 SEC 7, XT896.31/, R. 2g / `X'a9896.7 X8996.1 896.3 X896.3 X896.5 X897.5 I I 1 - - - / 92•I 1 X8 X896.5 X896.4 X896.8 897.3 896.5 -� X896.3 X896.5 X896.8 X896.9 X897.0 X896.5 III - I 1 894.2 _ a .6 ,I 1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.9 X897.2 X896.9 X896.4 X896.2 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896. X896.0 X89 .I X896.2 X896.3 X896.7 897. I 02.5 8948 902 I1 15" PVC SAN STU II I INV=880.49 11 1 I c9 891.8 X895.7 X895.7 X895.9 X895. X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.5 X896.3 896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.2 896.0 896.0 X896.1 X896.3 X896.7 X897.5 I1 I 903.1 895.5 103.03 i 1 i�RQF �QR )� 0 50 100 200 NSCALE IN FEET 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED 12-10-2021: PARCEL B ADDED E Q N Ln I N O N C v N 0 O 00 N / O / L 0 00 0 N N CD N 011 a� 0 0 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS O SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 44110 GAS • FOUND IRON MONUMENT D SANITARY SEWER A SET NAIL 44110 >> STORM SEWER Q ANOKA CO. C.I.M. WATERMAIN © COMMUNICATION BOX FO FIBER OPTIC �S SANITARY MANHOLE 0u OVERHEAD UTILITY ❑ CATCH BASIN E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -0- POWER POLE -X-X- FENCE GUY WIRE GRAVEL GUY POLE - - - - - - - EDGE OF WATER/DITCH LIGHT POLE EDGE OF TREES X WATER VALVE CONCRETE -6- FIRE HYDRANT - - TOP OF DITCH O WELL FE MI ELECTRIC METER GM GAS METER EM ELECTRIC METER 0 HAND HOLE 0 FIBER OPTIC BOX O SANITARY CLEAN OUT a-� 0 SIGN EM ELECTRIC METER a CULVERT 7-1 MAILBOX ® BOLLARD 896.6 894.5 I I 1 O � Z na9i.o x896.5 I X X I� O I I X896.7 X896.4 3.2 898.0- X897.8 X 7. I O I I X896.3 X896.7 X897.1 X897.5 X897.6 I X896.5 X896.9 X896.8 897.2 I a-Q O RIM=902.32 I N SW COR. OF THE NW S LINE OF THE NW //4 RW96TO/E Xe96.7� 70 XSs".2 Xass.7 Xas6.3 III � PL S /2��4I Nv s=897.62 EM I I _ $/ OF THE NE l/4 OF ' NE 114 OF SEC. 7, T. 3I, R. 22 I I Xasz1 MATCH LINE - iINV W- %�7� `. �.. 89I g93.4 9�3 _ sz:4 / SEC 7, XT896,3I, R. 24 - Xass 3 - X .a X896.5 896.4 896.1 896.3 X896.3 X896.5 X897.5 I 1 X Xss6.a as7.3 I�"ao� a X896.5 X X 896.9 Xasss - 896.3 X896.5 896.8 X X897.0 894.2 02.5 �• 2.0 I X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X896.9 X897.2 X896.9 X896.4 X896.2 X896.3 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896. X896.0 X89 .1 X896.2 X896.3 X896.7 897..894.8 9� �00 1 903. ' 9I 1 15" PVC SAN STU 0)02. II 1 II _ -- - INV=880.49 00 S 511PV S 12 DI 891.8 903.1 8955 X895.7 X895.7 X895.9 X895. X896.1 X896.3 X896.5 X896.5 X896.3 896.1 X896.1 X896.2 X896.5 X896.6 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 X896.4 X896.2 896.0 896.0 X896.1 X896.3 X896.7 X897.5 902.2 I 1.6 I 0.4 �LRIM=903.03 I, 896 12v RCP 53 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X C 999.6 6.0 895.7 895.5 895.6 895.8 896.1 896.2 8 6.1 895.9 895.9 895.9 896.0 896.1 896.4 896.5 896.5 896.3 896.1 896.1 896. 8 895.5 895.8 595.8 89 896.2 897. .3 \ RIM=902.65_; 895.2 .2 \ N V = 880.37 X v 1 896. X895.8 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 896.0 X896.3 X896.3 X8 6.1 X895.9 X895.9 6.0 X895. X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 96.0 8 .0 X895.9 895.7 X895.8 8 1.7 89 8 6 O ^ 896.5 .5 899.1 $Oj V � I 898.1 - 8 .8 X895.7 X895.6 X895.6 X895.6 X895.7 X896.0 X896.2 X896.3 X896. X89 .0 �896.0 X896.0 X 95.9 .0 X896.1 X896.2 X896.4 X896.2 X895.9 ��895Y X895. X896.2 X896.3 X896.4 X896.7 X896.7 I I 894.9 / LO II L1_ - - 5) --� _00 _ U ` X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 896.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 96.0 96.0 896.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.4 X896.6 X896.4 Xs� 895.6 X895.8 X896.1 X896.3 X896.8 X897.2 X897.4 I 36"_CMP__ - / ��� 896.8 i INV=894.95 - - -_ --- a92.2 6 �- 894.4 -c V a96 s�Q<v�36" CMP / 897.4- �$95.2 X895.2 X895.2 X895.3 X895.8 X 96.0 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.1 X896.0 X895.9 896.0 X896.4 X896.4 X896.6 X896." X896.6X895.-8 .9 X89 .0 896.1 X896.5 X897.1 Xa97.s X897 - I a/ - --- a ." LLLJ ' _ L--J III U) < -1\ / \ 1 X894.9 X894.7 X894.7 X895.0 X895.5 896.0 X896.3 X896.3 X896.2 X896.2 X896. X895.9 896.0 X896.4 X896.6 X896.7 X896.8 X896.6 895.7 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X896.5 X897.1 X897.6 X895 I I -D <^ 895.0 1 N 897.5- I\ 4829.8 Q L -L _ - < -1\ a91.6-1�3 8894.5 X894.4 X894.6 X894.8 X895.2 X8 5.8 X896.3 X896.4 X896.3 X 96.1 X895.8 X895.8 896.0 X896.5 X896.5 X896.7 X896.9 P • <896 X895. X896.1 896.0 X896.1 X896.4 X897.1 X897.4 X897. I I W 897.1 as I� NO BUILDI GS OBSERVED �I N >-DLLJ L Q= / L - i I� I\' 895.0 X895.2 X895.3 X895.2 X895.2 X895.5 X896.1 X896.4 X896.4 X89. X895.8 X895.7 896.0 X896.4 X896.6 X896<1 X896.6 896.0 X895.5 X895.8 X895.8 96.0 X896.4 X897.0 X897.2 X897. I � _ 1�� L -L- / �' W / \ CJ O I O�� / \ I ti 0 L I10NN �(n W / LAX 895.4 X895.6 X 5.9 X86.2 X 896.4 X 896.4 X896.2 895.9 896.0 X896.5 X86. \ x896.6 X89 .X 895.7 X 895.4 X895.8 896.0 X896.2 X 896.6 X897.0 O", 2- L 896.6 1 J - T -c J LAX 895.4 X895.6 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.7 X89 .9 X896.1 X896.2 X896.2 X896.2 X 96.1 896.0 X/896.4 IX896.5 X896.3 X 96.1 895.9 X895.4 X89 .9 X896.1 X896.3 X896." X897.1 X896.9 ~ 897. 0 Z I� Z < C' 0- Q O L 1 J -- W d X895.3 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.8 96.0 X896.1 X896 X895.8 X89 . 895.8 /X895.6 -X89 . X896.2 X896.3 X896.2 895.9 X895.3 X895.8 X895. X896.3 X896.8 X897.1 X897.2 J \ c �'� 9.8 L 1 - - ` L L 596.4 < 898.2 Z I I -7- 895 392.1 i \-/ / - 34.8 ( \ 891.9 -900.0 98.6C0-893.7 X895.4 X895.5 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.9 X895.9 X895.9 X895.5 X895.5 X895.4 X895.5 X895 9 X896.2 5�896.3 X896. X895.7 X895.1 X895.6 X 6.0 X896.6 X897.2 X897.6 898.1 X ' 7 d' 893.4,1N + 898.2 � 2k HIGH RIM-897ocs .22� (pI I X895.8 X895.8 X895.6 X895.5 X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X895.7 X895.7 X895.4 r\X8P5.5 X895.4 95.8 X896.4 X 6.7 X896.6 X896.4 X895.8 X895.1 X89. X896.2 X896.9 X897 X898.5 X8989// / \ LOW RIM-896.11 , INV-895.12 \ 00 I r 91.4 96 < / (J 500`- - �� gg p I 95.6 I5 FSS \ \ �D� 901.7 M OUTLET 7i j<a��.�s- ��s.o _Xass.7_ Xass.s-Xass.s Xass.s- �ass_s ass.s -X8sMs, ss� e9s7 - s� (ass. Xss�+ Xes7.� Xa9�a- s s9s. assT-Xass.a �ass.s �a �.7 Xasa.s / ,4� O CONTROL 01 ,- r STRUCTL 7 ' ?� /--� OF POWER INE INPLA E CO 0 7 OU L1J 91 UOU OU OU OU OU OU OU - OU 0 U - OUPOU - 0 U OU OU - OU - .900.9 - - - 8 `.L �99�s �.. 1/ao��®F__Lo�F_�_�oa°,�,,F�--�,,T�tY�BQ5.�- � 0 9 897.5 6.3 X 895. U X 896. 89 - - u ou ou ou • ou oU 0u 0U ou 0 u ou o u 9 �,f) < _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_- -_-_- -_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - I ! - - Xa 892 89621� 3-'y\`89 .-X-n5.8- �895:5-XS95� -X99- .4 �8�5.4v naa5.4 -X895.4 X 5.9 X896.5 X 96.2 6.6-- 89�:2- 97.5 X898.0 X897.8 X8 6.5 95.7 X896.1 X896.3 X896.6 X897.1 -I X89 I 97.9 -_ .3 i .� _ _ - - - - - - I L 1 J �b8.8 8. 898.3 T Lf)I I 11 X895. 895.9 X895.8 X895.5 X895.5 'X895.5 X895.6 X895.7 X8 .8 X896.4 89 X 897.0 X897.3 X897.7 X897.8 X8 6.6 895.8 X896.0 896.0 X896.3 X896.6 8 18 I -- li -<� - `\ CL OF 90 FT EASEMENT ---------- I --- Xo s s".a / - - �- ` PER DOC. NO_325474 - - - I I X .5 0000 X895.7 X895.9 X895.8 X895. X895.6 896.0 X896.2 X896.4 X896.5-X_$968- -X896. 895.6 X895.5 6.0 X896.4 X896.8 X897.0 896.2 X895.7 X895.8 XS 5.9 X896.4 X896.5 X 6. I g .3 On �� 1 891. 892.4 - - -I -� - CD I L 1 L -L _ / - \ r\ I11 I 90 .6 / < - L - J I X895.5 X8s .9 X895.9 X895.6 Xass. X896.2 X896.5 X896.7 X896.6 X896.4 896.5 X895.5 X895.1 X895.4 Xa95.6 X895.8 Xass. 895." X895.6 X895.9 X896.1 X896.5 X896.4 I .7 9a 0 897.2 \ - / X 975 ----I I \ 96.7 L 1 - i \ / \ II X895.7 X866.2_ X896.2 X895.9 X89 9 X896.3 Xa96.8 X897.1 X896.8 8 .0 X895.7 Xa95.2 X895.1 X895.5 X895.8 Xa95.8 X895.7 X895.4 X 95.7 X896.1 X896.2 X896.3 X8 .I I I 3: �+ 897.0 9• Ld I8 III IQ r - - T - 1 00 X896.6 X897.0 X896.9 X896.7 X896.4 X896.5 X896.6 X897.1 X897.1 X89 .4 X895.5 X895.1 X895.1 X895.6 896.0 X89 X895.9 X895.3 X89 6 X896.3 X896.2 X 6.1 X895.9 O m Q - - 891L -L. 1 I I '4 897.3 N O - - X897.2 X897.3 X897.1 X897.0 X897.3 X897.4 X897.2 X897.3 �897.2 X896.8 6.1 X895.2 X895.0 X895.4 X895. X896.3 X896.4 X895.5 895.9 X896.6 X896.4 896.0 X895 1 896.9 0 L 1 J 98.0 L 1_ L- J I I B�J� / < I 898 I 9&2 cl- Q o \ / X897.0 X896.8 X896.5 X896.7 X 97.7 X898.4 X898.3 X 97.8 X897.2 X896.9 X896.5 X895.2 X894.9 X895.2 X895.5 X896.4 X897.0 89 .9 896.5 X897.3 X896.9 X896.5 X896.3 1 I 898.3 9.0 --> 81. 8�1 72" CM_P I I 9 - - INV=889.74, I p L 1 J ` I 896 5Nv=888.84 �9 I 89 5 900.3 8 .5 X895.9 X895.8 X895.8 X896.4 X 97.7 X898.4 X898 X897.6 X897.1 X896.9 X896.5 X895.2 X895.0 X895.4 X895. X896.5 X8�7.3 X89 897. X �" D�X897.4 X896.8--=}>;�s�o � �I. I 12" CM - 12" MP / __18° CMP S LINE OF THE SW l/ OF THE 1.0=891.37, INV- 90.50 _ N��89 . a ,-1-------- _ / 894.4 INV=898.17, - 897.2 ,0 11.8 RIM=_900.92 896 / NE l 4 OF SEA'. _7 - - - - - - _ � � I � �g INV=896.15 - 891.3 ,INV S-896.0 8" RCP____ _ 896. 897.1 " 892 893.2 R1M=_9_0_2.12 \ - =896= _ - - - 94 E E INV=887.59 i soo.5 896 - - 95.9 a• v 98.2 P CMP 898.4 902a _ _ - 2 so s Xas7a w CONNEXUS _ X �V LFC) ��X896. SERF 8'oOMP (PER MAPS) S9s.s I- S S 9 .6 4 _ i �897.4 89 .8 898.1 �898.4 g _ 97' 97.5 8\� 898.3 BIT RFACE INV=900.01 �898.7 �898.8 affi.6 •3 1 896.8 \ 6 12"I DIP 8. 900.1 CARL STRE (PUBLIC) 97.6��6a \ 2.2 \ L902.3 9o1.890L.4� 901.3� / 7�.5 E'RL STREET- \TNH=904_91 - n r n rn 901.9 R=_-(AS TRAVELED) 2'2 I I r 900_82�'2.2 � RIM=901.89 F < F < \ I H < NV N=895.90 _I_8_ RCP,' CONNEXUS INV=888.88 INV S=895.75 15" RCP NV=894.64 (PER MAPS) 0 50 100 200 NSCALE IN FEET 11-9-2021: TOP OF DITCH ADDED 12-10-2021: PARCEL B ADDED E Q IP Ln I N O N O C� N O 0 O O 00 O N / O 0 a� O 00 0 N N O N 011 0 L 0 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS _a r --- - -mac•_. '`- -- -- - --- _� "'"°"\ a Lm ,-T ki , -1a J� AN, Ap.JIP SITE DATA 1 �/1 AREAS: 157.054 acres (Per ALTA Survey) + 1.4356 acres ryio:ms,zzzz000zl LEG EN D TOTAL GROSS AREA OF CONCEPT: 158.490 acres DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY — '� r I • 1 ,� WETLANDS: DITCHES - PUBLIC & PRIVATE PER SURVEY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY N. 1 CONCEPT PLAN DETAILS: PROPOSED LOT uNES •+.7�� - �!- 4 • LOCAL PUBLIC ROAD TYPICAL SECTION = 60' ROW, 30' B-B PROPOSED SETBACK _ PARKWAY TYPICAL SECTION = 1 00'ROW, 20' BB w/ 20 MEDIAN". EAST -WEST COLLECTOR - 66' ROW, 36' BB PUBLIC ROADWAY 1 _ 1,.�,.+•- - - - - - PRIVATE DRIVE ROADS = 24' BB TOP BACK CURB/ROAD EDGE/STRIPING . :+'C" _,• r RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ASSUMPTIONS i-t {�' - ' i a •• 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK PRIVATE ROADWAY •• 5/10 OR 7.5/7.5' SIDE YARD SETBACK TOP BACK OF CURB •• 25SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ROWy- ' L•. - + r - •• 50' SETBACK TO COUNTY ROADS (SINGLE FAMILY) SETBACK 8' PUBLIC TRAIL+ _ WETLAND ONSITE ASSUMED AS HIGHEST CLASSIFICATION • TOWNHOME /ROWHOME DETAILS s' PUBLIC SIDEWALK. �. •• 22. MIN. DRIVEWAY •• 20, MIPROPOSED POND AREAN. BUILDING SEPARTION •• 24' BB PRIVATE DRIVES 65' WIDE LOTS °• s' i. LOT SUMMARY 55LOTS: WIDE - -� 65' WIDE LOTS = 98 50' WIDE LOTS !t ' 55' WIDE LOTS = 82 y •' •. ��' y j r ' 50' WIDE LOTS = 83 BACK -BACK ROWHOMES �. t ^' .-. 1�T" ROWHOMES (BACK TO BACK AND ROW) = 64 ROW TOWNHOMES = 100� Z. �,' ROW TOWNHOMES ► t• MULTI FAMILY HOUSING = 280 - TOTAL HOUSING UNITS = 710 UNITS MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING (CONTINENTAL)Ai ROBINSON PROPERTY - CONCEPT PLAN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA x ;': Ap". _ • 1 e, QO=U��U w ' ® z • 0 75 150 300 e9 SCALE IN FEET N REVISION DATE: 12-13-2021 (>iaMnv 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 MAIN A L L I A N T 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com uq - - -- �~ EXISTING DITCHF-T — 8 7 6 5 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 4 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 42 3 nI — c 2 51 _ _ — — — -- +^ 78 79 80 81 _ 82 — — 59 60 61 fit 63 64 65 66 67 75 76 77 Dc 50 43 44 45 46 47 48 51 1 v I 49 50 fib 74 I 58 49 I 52 r 69 57 73LLJ 1 48 53 + 56 70 72 �n + 52 47 53 54 54 55 71 55 96 97 98 2 95 46 LAKE 3 8.0 ACRES POND t 45 56 POND 2.7 ACRES 94 4 + 59 58 57 .3 ACRE 44 + 93 5 92 43 81 91 I 80 82 6 I 42 fig 70 ' 7 — � _ 60 68 71 79 83 90 / I fit 8 67 72 78 84 89 fit 87 9 s 41 ` 38 37 63 74 75 76 77 85 8fi 88 ,� fi4 65 fib 73 36 10 40 39 — _ -- — ❑� C 35 11 v I 34 13 12 + �n 33 11 18 17 16 15 14 + o j I 32 3111 30 29 28 f 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 POND 11 + + 11 � 0.5 ACR . C CARDINAL WAY ROBINSON DR (PUBLIC) — - (PUBLIC) ........ - - - - - - - - - - AM - - - ' - ram- • . r 'S z �.;i '7 ''f t U - � � �. � � � v � . ova � • ��e�r..=.,�<:�r.: ir.�t�r - _: ©w cc I a 00 0 I 0 I 4 cLuSHOUse — 1 g� 1 im: m f r----1- _r cn �w zcr oQ a- c� t Map I Bills � Qr 46 + — ' 47 1 CLUB 48 2 ' 49 3 CC 50 4 51 Cb 5 82 ' 52 45 6 81 ' 53 44 7 I 80 54 43 1 55 8 79 8 56 42 9 + 78 1 41 �1 9 57 10 77 / 40 11 76 POND 58 39 �+ 5.3 ACRES / 59 38 Q� � 12 I 75 60Crs 37 13 74 AT y Aw 14 73 6116 71 + 15 1 72 62 35 co 17 I 70 / 66 65 64 fi3 fib fi7 / 34 . !` `s� .ter •4 33 Al' 19 32 i 2fi 27 28 29 30 31 w _ off 0 �' 20 21 22 / 23 24 25 It Awl :fir '• .1. i - �,. of '+ `j * ` r r r 4 CARL STREET (PUBLIC) I 9n fe ru fe er6es,UC LINO LAKES,MN r S CARL STREET (PUBLIC) ALLIANT 12-3-Luz E 4 �� m■� iu::r' �,. a �--- l IAII�r u u�t•� 1 ', '',,,.,ram "'0� \ -Y � � i '�+ I 8 "� I-'� �_ •� I t "*5m��ti • y .r I. -a. '7 A: I �I *} o _ @d ii— Tlow, r 41 '�J _ ' ' fie` - .f� +� • �R�+L.+ I I i "o -,X 'I LEGEND ` �� rl► - - _ r I DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY r1 /1 r1 1 w I n /1 \ 1 r1 r1 /1 r1 r• r1 T\/ n I l r% r% o% l I \ I r% 1 01% It I LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA N REVISION DATE: 12-10-2021 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 MAIN A L L I A N T 612.758.3099 FAX EN GIN EERING www.alliant-inc.com wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: January 5, 2022 Re: Robinson Property Concept Plan WSB has reviewed the Robinson Property Concept Plan for a 710 unit PUD prepared by Integrate Properties, LLC and submitted on December 13, 2021. The site is located south of Main Street (CSAH 14), east of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53), and north of Robinson Drive and Carl Street. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was not provided and should be completed for this site. Engineering • Erosion Control & Grading The proposed Robinson Property project would require mass site grading, appurtenant erosion control, and a SWPPP. Stormwater Management The Robinson Property is drained by a series of private ditches and roadway ditches west of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) and south of Main Street (CSAH 14) that tie into Anoka County public ditch 10- 22-32 (ACD 10-22-32). ACD 10-22-32 flows south through the Robinson Property to Carl Street. ACD 10-22-32 continues south under Carl Street and ultimately discharges to Marshan Lake. Anoka County should review the preliminary drainage design and site access concurrent to the City's preliminary plat reviews. Most of the site is within the City's General Floodplain District (FEMA Zone A) and, according to the Geotechnical Evaluation Report cited in the Concept Plan Submittal, groundwater levels range from 4-feet to 9-feet in depth. The applicant will be required to meet all City of Lino Lakes ordinances and RCWD rules for surface water management. The Robinson Property is in the Marshan Resource Management Unit (RMU) according to the City of Lino Lakes 2018 Local Water Management Plan (WMP). The WMP noted several issues within the Marshan RMU, including the following issue pertinent to the Robinson Property: "ACD 10-22-32 is ineffective for future urban runoff volumes." (Appendix B). A strategy for mitigating this issue specific to the Robinson Property noted in the WMP was: "Proposed master community plan for sod fields" (Appendix B). In addition, the WMP identified existing and future flooding and pollutant loading concerns within the RMU, including Marshan Lake and adjacent wetlands and ACD 10-22-32 (Table 2-21). WMP Goal 4.1 is to "Provide adequate storage and conveyance of runoff to protect public safety and minimize property damage." To address the City's flooding concerns in accordance with this goal, implementing stormwater rate and volume control practices where feasible throughout the Robinson Property will be critical. Sufficient freeboard must be provided for proposed structures above the seasonal high groundwater levels and floodplain elevations in compliance with City Ordinance Chapter 1102 (Stormwater, Erosion and Sediment Control) and RCWD Rule C (Stormwater Management). Ditch conveyance capacity along Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) and Main Street (CSAH Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 2 14) should be maintained and street entrance ditch crossings should utilize large and/or multiple pipe or box culverts. City and RCWD regulatory floodplain management requirements will also need to be met (See Floodplain below). WMP Goal 7.2 is to "Ensure that well -planned, quality residential... development accommodates the City's projected growth needs and occurs in a manner that also conserves and enhances the City's natural resources and amenities." To assist the City in meeting this goal, the applicant should provide the following for the proposed stormwater ponds and lakes: 1) shoreline geometry that more closely resembles natural bodies of water, 2) buffers for natural vegetation and high-water level bounce, 3) areas for future maintenance activities (e.g., pond/lake dredge material removal and dewatering) and 4) differentiation of the water quality and quantity function, goal, and design of both. Water Supply The existing properties are identified as a Stage 1A and 1B Planned Service Areas in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There is existing 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main along Robinson Drive and Century Trail south of the site and a 8-inch DIP water main on Carl Street (west cul-de-sac). There is a 10-inch DIP water stub for the Robinson Property off of Cardinal Way and two 12-inch diameter DIP water main stubs at the intersection of Robinson Drive and Century Trail. It is feasible to extend the water main to service the proposed lots. However, the size of the water main will have to be determined and the water main will need to be looped through the site. All proposed units will be required to connect to the City's water system. • Sanitary Sewer The existing properties are identified as a Stage 1A and 1B Planned Service Areas in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and they are located in the 21 sanitary sub -district. There is existing 12-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer along Robinson Drive and 15-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer along Century Trail. A sewer stub extends to the north from the manhole at the intersection of Robinson Drive and Century Trail with an invert of 879.78. There is a sanitary manhole at the north end of Cardinal Way with an invert of 883.18. The sanitary sewer on Cardinal Way is 10- inch diameter PVC. Inverts are according to record plans for the Century Farms North development. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies future 10-inch diameter and 15-inch diameter trunk lines within the site. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also identifies future forcemain along Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) to the west of the site and future 10-inch and 12-inch trunk lines along Main Street (CSAH 14) north of the site. All proposed units will be required to connect to the City's sanitary sewer system. • Transportation The Robinson Property is located south of Main Street (CSAH 14), east of Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) north of Robinson Drive and east of Century Trail. The concept plan includes an extension of Century Trail from Robinson Drive to Main Street (CSAH 14), extension of Robinson Drive to the east property line, a connection from the site to Robinson Drive at Cardinal Way and a new street access to Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) between Robinson Drive and Main Street (CSAH 14). The following summarizes the data and analysis from the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 3 Functional Existing Existing Projected Projected Roadway Classification ADT Roadway 2040 Post Recommended Improvements section ADT 2040 ADT Main St Principal 8,400 2-lane 13,700 28,000 Widen to a 4-Lane section (CSAH 14) Arterial Sunset Ave Major 2,400 2-lane 2,900 9,000 (CSAH 53) Collector Minor Extension as a 2-lane section Robinson Dr Collector na 2-lane na na from Century Trl to 4th Ave to Wood Duck Trl Minor Extension as a 2-lane section Century Trl Collector na 2-lane na na from Robinson Dr to Main St (CSAH 14) Cardinal Local na 2-lane na na Connection to development Way local street Complete east/west connection Carl St Local na 2-lane na na and connection to development local street (currently not included in Concept Plan) Based on the review of the Concept Plan the following was concluded: • The Concept Plan is generally consistent with the Transportation Section of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • The completion of Carl Street and a connection to the proposed site development streets should be included with the development plan. • A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) should be completed to document the traffic operational and safety impacts of the proposed development. The analysis would determine the turn lane and traffic control needs at the adjacent intersections and site access streets. • A second access to the multi -family area should be provided. • The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies two trail segments and a greenway through or adjacent to the proposed development. One provides a connection adjacent to Century Trail from the existing trail along Robinson Drive and the other is a new trail through the site from Century Farms North Park to the Main Street (CSAH 14) at Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) intersection. These trails should be included as part of the Concept Plan. • Wetlands The site includes wetlands along the ditches and in the area north of Carl Street. An approved wetland delineation will be required. The applicant will need to work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act regulations. • Landscaping The landscaping will be reviewed with future submittals. • Floodplain Most of the site is within the City's General Floodplain District (FEMA Zone A). A Base Flood Elevation will need to be determined and approved by FEMA. A LOMR will be required. RCWD will require floodplain mitigation. • Drainage and Utility Easements Per City Code, the City requires 10-ft wide drainage and utility (D&U) easements along plat Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ms. Katie Larsen 1 /5/2022 Page 4 boundaries and along lot lines. Drainage and utility easements along lot lines are allowed to be centered on common rear and side lot lines. All trails will be required to be within D&U easements at the time of platting. Separate trail easements will need to be documented after the plat has been approved. The right-of-way for local collector roadways, Century Trail and Robinson Drive, shall be 66-ft wide. All other local roads shall have designated right-of-way that is 60-ft wide. 00 Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final platting process. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be required with the final plat. Public facilities will be covered by the City's Programmatic Maintenance Agreement. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit 6. Anoka County Right -of -Way and Access Permit 7. USACE for Wetland Alteration 8. FEMA LOMR If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee(a-)linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar(a-)wsbeng.com. Robinson Property Concept Plan Engineering Ile CITY OF LQ� KES To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Environmental Memo Date: January 5tt', 2022 Re: Environmental Board Comments/January 4t', 2022/Robinson Property The Environmental Board, at their January 4t", 2022 meeting, had the following recommendations for Robinson Property Concept Plan: 1. A multi -functional, cohesive Greenway System plan shall be incorporated into the development, including trails, open space, natural areas, wetland and buffers, stormwater management features, and floodplain management. 2. A diverse mix of native plants and plants beneficial to pollinators shall be utilized wherever possible and/or practical. This should include vegetative buffers around wetlands and stormwater management features, and also in required open space and landscape plantings. 3. Wider native vegetation buffers should be included adjacent to ponds, including on rear lot lines. 0 Page 1 From: Brandon T. Ulvenes To: Katie Larsen Cc: Logan J. Keehr; Jane Rose; Nicholas Dobda; Jerry J . Auge; Sean Thiel; Jason Orcutt; Jack Forslund Subject: ACHD Preliminary Comments on Robinson Development Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:24:15 PM Attachments: image001.Dng imaae002.pnna Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Good Afternoon — Per your request, our development review team has a look at the concept plans for the Robinson Property along Main St (CSAH 14). Below are our preliminary comments and thoughts on this site. Please note that when ready, the preliminary plat will still be required to go through the standard formal review process at the County. The County has some concerns with the proposed access points onto CSAH 14 and CSAH 53. Due to the magnitude of the development being proposed, a traffic impact analysis will need to be completed for the development area for Anoka County review and approval. It will need to take into account the directional distribution of the trips to be generated, access spacing, intersection sight distance, intersection operations, safety, intersection control alternatives, recommended geometric improvements, right-of-way needs and impacts, intersection queuing, levels of service, impacts of delays, etc. on the county highways and intersections that will be impacted by this development. The traffic impact analysis should also ensure that the proposed access scheme will be compatible with any potential future development projects north of CSAH 14. The traffic impact study should define a functional intersection control type for the new street access points onto the county highway system, whether they are roundabout, right-in/right-out, three-quarter, or signalized intersection with full turn lanes. (Please note, the County has an unfunded project identified in our 5 Year HIP for the construction of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of CSAH 14 and CR 53, targeted for 2024. We had concerns regarding safety and operations of this intersection, even without the added traffic from this proposed development). Also note that per standard, the costs to implement the recommendations are typically borne by the developer. Some specific concerns and feedback we have are: • The proposed full access onto CR 53 appears to be too close to the existing access for Robinson Dr. It is our recommendation that one of these accesses would need to be a RI/RO. As proposed, the two full access locations do not meet County spacing guidelines. Whether the full access is at Robinson Dr or the newly proposed access is up to the City. Construction of a NB right turn lane and SB left turn lane would be required at the full access intersection on CR 53. 9 The County advises that construction of a trail should be considered along both CSAH 14 and CR 53 for the length of the site and that the City consider further trail construction beyond the limits of this development for logical tie-ins to the existing city street and trail network for users. Depending on the future section of CSAH 14, the trail may need to be located in a separate easement outside of the County R/W. • The City should also give consideration to including sound walls in the development agreement since there is a possibility that CSAH 14 will be reconstructed as a divided 4 lane road at some point in the future, necessitating a noise analysis and likely noise walls if federally funded. • The proposed connection from the ring -road to the extension of Century Trail is likely too close to CSAH 14 and will need to be shifted farther to south, as NB traffic queues at CSAH 14 may back-up through the intersection. The traffic analysis will likely verify this. • As noted above, a roundabout is currently planned for the intersection of CSAH 14 and CR 53. We have placed a few roundabout concept footprints at the intersection and determined that the proposed R/W dedication is not sufficient. From our preliminary review, we recommend the NW corner of the site should include a triangular R/W chamfer with 80' legs from the current proposed ROW intersection. If the traffic study proposes a roundabout at the new, western street access, then we would like a similar dedication on that corner, as well. As depicted on the concept plan, 60' of R/W along CR 53 and 75' along CSAH 14 should be adequate for future County highway reconstruction. • Utility relocation along CSAH 14 and CR 53 should be anticipated, and the County will require that utility coordination and relocation plans be included in the approved development plans for this project. County staff should be included in the utility relocation meetings for this project. • Internal site grading for the development is not to commence until the required ACHD Engineering Plan Review approvals are received and applicable permits can be issued. We appreciate the opportunity to review this development at a concept plan level. Please reach out to Logan Keehr or myself if you have any questions or would like to meet and discuss. We look forward to working with you on this project. Thanks, Brandon T. Ulvenes Anoka County Highway Department Direct — (763) 324 • 3159 Office — (763) 324 • 3100 brandon.ulvenesl@co.anoka.mn.us NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be disclosed to third parties. WS — Item 5 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 5 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: John Swenson, Public Safety Director Re: Fire Division Donation Background During the Council meeting on January 10, 2022 Council accepted an anonymous donation to purchased wildland fire suppression equipment but direct staff not to move forward on the purchasing the purchase until proposed equipment purchase could be discussed at Council Work Session. Attached is the staff report from the January 10, 2022 Council meeting with details on the proposed purchase with some sample photos of wildland fire suppression UTV and photo of Grass 11 (Vehicle #605; 1993 GMC 5-10). Staff is seeking Council direction. Attachments Staff Report from January 10, 2022 CITY COUNCIL 4A AGENDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director MEETING DATE: January 10, 2022 TOPIC: Acceptance Monetary Donation for Fire Division VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting council approval to accept a monetary donation from a resident that wishes to remain anonymous. BACKGROUND A resident, who wishes to remain anonymous, of our community has come forward with a monetary donation of $100,000.00 for the Fire Division to purchase equipment. This resident received public safety services in 2021 and has communicated to staff they are extremely appreciative. If Council approves acceptance of this donation, the funds would be used to purchase a wildland fire suppression utility vehicle (UTV) with a trailer. The UTV will be a Polaris Ranger 1000 (4 door) outfitted with 75 gallon water tank, 5 gallon foam tank, fire suppression pump, and emergency equipment. With the purchase of this UTV wildland fire suppression asset, Grass 11 (Vehicle # 605; 1993 GMC S-10) would be sold and proceeds deposited into the Fleet Capital Replacement. The UTV wildland fire suppression unit would be positioned at Fire Station 1 and when deployed would be pulled by RI I (Vehicle # 607). Item Vendor Cost UTV Lakes Area Power Sports Polaris Ranger $27,000.00 Tracks Lakes Area Power Sports Dura Tracks/ Clutch $15,949.00 Pump/ Tank MacQueen $26,000.00 Emergency Lights MacQueen $6,500.00 Radio Anoka Co $5,700.00 Rear Winch Polaris $1,200.00 Head Sets MacQueen $5 000.00 Graphics Advanced Graphix $600.00 Chain Saw LTG Power $400.00 Trailer Lakes Area Power Sports Floe Versa MAX $6,200.00 Contingence $5 451.00 Total $100,000.00 The purchase of the proposed wildland fire suppress UTV would address an identified need for wildland fire suppression while addressing the need to replace G11. The proposed UTV would improve the Fire Division ability to address wildland fires by increasing the volume of water available, adding the ability to use fire suppressing foam, increase the number of firefighters that can be deployed from two to four, and enhances firefighter safety in the field. Staff is including contingency funds in the proposal to offset cost overages such as. Staff has been informed by two of vendors that supplied pricing for this proposal, that cost have been impacted by supply and demand issues leading to fluctuating pricing based on when orders are placed. If pricing comes in more favorably and there are funds remaining from this donation those funds will be utilized to purchase other fire equipment needs in a manner consistent with the donors' wishes. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council accept a monetary donation in the amount of $100,000 from an anonymous Lino Lakes resident for the purchase of fire suppression equipment. ATTACHMENTS Photos of Polaris UTV M®. go ,�wunuxa�^' a POLRRIS O4i RNN[NrJLocrEiisE .a r � a IF Vr S -__ .ti II �� I � r MM- y.a FIRE 70 (76 trf� n �. Q �. 1 � V . •�©e i 1 1/ 1 Tw� - -- - ,o-,ti�000* F iR �� , osao r I `Gwn�r4 iilq- �.+�*" �� 1 �a -*r •7 �gry ^ i• (/�' ', �,. � 3d4*F'+ '\,f /� �� � � '� � % � \� / � ice:: ��ti / ! s �!1 / t WS — Item 6 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 6 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator Re: Smart Irrigation Controller Program Background In our area, over 60% of water usage for a typical home is used for outdoor irrigation during the growing season. Of that water use, roughly 50% is wasted on overwatering, evaporation, and non -target watering. One of the most impactful and easy to implement options to improve our water conservation efforts in the City involves increasing the efficiency of outdoor irrigation. Smart irrigation controllers have been found to reduce water use by up to 50%. If smart irrigation controllers were installed at all addresses currently connected to municipal water, it could lead to a 20% savings on yearly water pumped in the entire City. The smart irrigation controller program was last discussed at the March 1", 2021 Work Session. After Council approval at that meeting, the City purchased 100 Rachio 3 smart irrigation controllers. This first order of controllers sold out in about three months. Staff is monitoring water usage data for the properties that have installed smart controllers. 2021 was an exceptionally dry year which led to increased irrigation demand city-wide. This may also have impacted the usage data that was gathered, making the benefits of the controllers less clear. Additional data will be needed in the coming years to gage the benefit of the controllers at individual addresses. As part of the City's water conservation efforts, staff is proposing to continue the smart irrigation controller program by purchasing 110 Rachio 3 controllers. $20,000 was budgeted for this program in the 2022 Water Utility budget. Program Details: 1. The City will purchase 110 controllers at $179.99 each using money from the Water Utility Fund. 2. These controllers will be available to residents on a first -come first -served basis at the discounted rate of $45.00 each (25% of the cost). 3. The program will be available for water utility customers that have an existing irrigation system and will be limited to one controller per address. The Environmental Board recommended implementation of the smart irrigation controller program at their January 27, 2021 meeting. The City Council approved implementation of this program at the March lst, 2021 Work Session. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting City Council direction to implement the Smart Irrigation Controller program by purchasing 110 controllers for sale in spring of 2022. WS — Item 7 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 7 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director Re: Capital Asset Policy Background The City has previously followed an informal Capital Asset Policy. A Capital Asset Policy does not affect the budgeting or purchasing of capital assets, it is strictly used for financial reporting purposes. The attached Capital Asset Policy provides guidance to meet financial reporting requirements. When preparing for the annual audit, staff is guided by the policy in regards to what is considered a capital asset, the cost that should be assigned to it, and the useful life in which the asset is depreciated. Previously, the City used a $2,500 capitalization threshold for all asset classes. The Capital Asset Policy assigns a capitalization threshold to each asset class. This practice is widely used by other local government units. Requested Council Direction Consider adoption of the Capital Asset Policy at the February 14, 2022 council meeting with it being retroactively effective for fiscal year beginning January 1, 2021. Attachments Capital Asset Policy CAPITAL ASSET POLICY January 1, 2021 INTRODUCTION The City of Lino Lakes was required to implement Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003. Statement No. 34 established new financial reporting requirements for state and local governments throughout the United States. Statement No. 34 created new information and restructured much of the information that the City of Lino Lakes had presented in its annual reports prior to implementation. The intent of those new requirements was to make annual reports more comprehensive and easier to understand and use. Two key components of Statement No. 34 required governments to report capital assets and the capital assets depreciation over their estimated useful lives. Though the City has informally followed a policy since the introduction of the new standards, it is necessary for the City to formally develop and implement a Capital Asset Policy that meets the financial statement reporting requirements. While the Capital Asset Policy is not all encompassing, it will provide guidance for the City to meet the reporting requirements, i.e., meeting the primary objective of financial reporting as it pertains to valuation, allocation, presentation and disclosure; therefore, this policy will not be used for property control purposes. This policy was approved 2/14/2022 and is effective retroactively to 1/1/2021. TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose 1 Section I Define Capital Assets and Capitalization Thresholds 1 Section 11 Reporting Capital Assets 1 Section III Major Asset Classes 2 Section IV Depreciating Capital Assets 6 Section V Capital Assets Estimated Useful Life 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES CAPITAL ASSET POLICY Purpose It is the policy of the City of Lino Lakes to maintain appropriate procedures regarding the procurement, management, and disposal of all capital assets in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 (GASB 34). This Capital Assets Policy establishes criteria for reporting capital assets within the City's financial statements in order to provide users with consistent and comparable information for the current and all future fiscal periods. Section I: Define Capital Assets and Capitalization Thresholds Capital assets are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the City's government -wide financial statements. A capital asset is real or personal property used in operations which has an individual value equal to or greater than the capitalization threshold set forth by the City, for that specific asset classification, and has an estimated useful life greater than one year. For financial reporting purposes only, the City will classify and establish capitalization thresholds for each asset class as follows: Land $10,000 Buildings and building improvements $50,000 Improvements other than buildings (land improvements) $25,000 Machinery and equipment $10,000 Infrastructure and other improvements $100,000 Other assets $10,000 Construction in progress *** ***Accumulate all costs and capitalize if over the capitalization threshold for the applicable asset class. Section II: Reporting Capital Assets Capital assets are reported at their historical cost. The historical cost of a capital asset should include the cost of the asset itself and the following: • Ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended location (e.g., freight charges) • Ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended condition for use (e.g., installation and site preparation charges) A cost should only be capitalized if it is (1) directly identifiable with a specific asset and (2) only if it is incurred after the acquisition of the related asset has come to be considered probable (i.e., "likely to occur"). For example, a study to determine the best location for a building or a feasibly study would not be capitalized while legal costs to acquire property would be capitalized. The historical cost of a capital asset should include the cost of any subsequent additions or improvements but exclude the cost of repairs and maintenance. An addition or improvement, unlike a repair, either enhances a capital asset's functionality (effectiveness or efficiency), or it extends a capital asset's expected useful life. For example, mill and overlays or periodically resurfacing a new road would be treated as a repair (the cost would not be capitalized), while reconstructing a road or adding a new lane constitutes an addition (a cost that would be capitalized). In the event the historical cost of a capital asset is not practically determinable, it will be necessary to record an estimated historical cost of the asset using alternative methods. Alternative methods include standard costing and normal costing. Standard costing estimates the historical cost of a capital asset by establishing the average cost of obtaining the same or a similar asset at the time of acquisition. Normal costing estimates historical cost based on the current cost to either reproduce or replace the capital asset, indexed by a reciprocal factor from the estimated acquisition date, i.e., taking the value of acquiring the asset new today and then discounting that amount by an appropriate inflation factor back to the date of acquisition. Assets that the City purchases at a nominal amount or are given by another party are to be recorded as donations rather than using the actual nominal cost to the City. Donated capital assets should be reported at their estimated fair value at the time of acquisition plus ancillary charges, if any. Fair value is the amount at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transfer at arm's length between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. For assets that do not have easily obtainable fair market values, the City should use the amount it would cost them to purchase or contract the asset in question. Donations are defined as voluntary contributions of resources to the City by a non -governmental entity. A voluntary contribution of resources between governmental entities is not a donation. Section III: Major Asset Classes Governments commonly report seven or more major classes of capital assets: 1. Land Land is generally characterized by an indefinite useful life; therefore, it is not depreciated. The cost of land should not only include its acquisition price, but also the cost of initially preparing the land for its intended use (excavation, fill, grading). Land frequently is closely associated with some other assets (e.g., land under a building or road). No matter how close this relationship may be, land should always be treated separately. Examples of items to be capitalized as land and land improvements include: Purchase price or fair value at time of gift Commissions • Professional fees, including title searches, architect, legal, engineering, appraisal, surveying, environmental assessments, etc. • Land excavation, fill, grading, and drainage • Demolition of existing buildings and improvements (less salvage value) • Removal, relocation, or reconstruction of property owned by others such as power, telephone, and railroad lines • Interest on mortgages accrued at the date of purchase • Accrued and unpaid taxes at the date of purchase • Other costs incurred in acquiring the land • Water wells, including initial cost for drilling, the pump, and its casing • Permanent right-of-way 2. Buildings and Building Improvements Buildings. All permanent structures that are attached to land, have a roof, are partially or completely enclosed by walls, and are not intended to be transportable or moveable are included in this asset class. The City can elect to report major components of buildings as separate capital assets in their own right, when these components have a significantly shorter estimated useful life than the structure to which they relate (e.g., HVAC). Examples of items to be capitalized as buildings include: Purchased Buildings • Original purchase price • Expenses for remodeling, reconditioning, or altering a purchased building to make it ready for its intended purpose • Environmental compliance, i.e., asbestos abatement • Professional fees, includes architectural, engineering, management fees for design and supervision, and legal fees • Cancellation or buyout of existing leases • Other costs required to place or render the asset into operation Constructed Buildings • Completed project costs • Cost of excavation, grading, or filling of land for a specific building • Expenses incurred for the preparation of plans, specifications, and blueprints • Building permits • Costs of temporary buildings used during construction • Additions to buildings, i.e., expansions, extensions, or enlargements Building Improvements. Building improvements include capitalized costs that materially extend the useful life of a building, increase the value of a building, or both. Building improvements should not include maintenance and repairs done in the normal course of business. If practical, the costs of an improvement are normally added to the cost of the related structure, rather than treating it as a separate asset. Examples of items to be capitalized as building improvements include: • Installation or upgrade of heating and cooling systems, including ceiling fans and attic fans • Original installation or upgrade of wall or ceiling covering such as carpeting, tiles, paneling, or parquet • Structural changes such as reinforcement of floors or walls, installation or replacement of beams, rafters, joists, steel grids, or other interior framing • Installation or upgrade of window or door -frames, upgrading windows or doors, built- in closet and cabinets • Interior renovation of casings, baseboards, light fixtures, and ceiling trim • Installation or upgrade of plumbing and electrical wiring • Installation or upgrade of telecommunication systems Examples of items considered repairs or maintenance in nature and should not be capitalized as buildings or building improvements include: • Adding, removing and/or moving of walls relating to renovation projects that are not considered major rehabilitation projects and do not increase the value of the building • Improvement projects of minimal or no added life expectancy and/or value to the building • Plumbing or electrical repairs • Cleaning, pest extermination, or other periodic maintenance • Interior decoration, i.e., draperies, blinds, curtain roads, wallpaper • Exterior decoration, i.e., detachable awnings, uncovered porches, decorative fences • Maintenance -type interior renovation including repainting, touch-up plastering, replacement of carpet, tile, or pane sections, and refinishing of sinks and fixtures • Replacement of a part or component of a building with a new part of the same type and performance capabilities, e.g., replacement of an old boiler with a new one of the same type and performance capabilities • Any other maintenance -related expenditure which does not increase the value of the building 3. Improvements Other Than Buildings (Land Improvements) This asset class is used for permanent (i.e., non -moveable) improvements, other than buildings, that add value to land but do not have an indefinite useful life (i.e. fences, parking lots, retaining walls). Moveable items should be classified as machinery and equipment. 4. Machinery and Equipment 4 This asset class includes vehicles, furnishings, and similar moveable items used for operations for which the benefit extends beyond one year from the date of receipt. Examples of expenditures to be capitalized as machinery and equipment include: • Original contract or invoice price • Freight charges • Handling and storage charges • In -transit insurance charges • Sales, use and other taxes imposed on the acquisition • Installation charges • Charges for testing and preparation for use • Cost of reconditioning used items • Parts and labor associated with the construction of equipment, machinery, or vehicles Note that the cost of extended warranties and/or maintenance agreements, which can be separately identified from the cost of the equipment, machinery, or vehicle, shall not be capitalized. 5. Infrastructure Infrastructure assets are long-lived capital assets that normally are stationary in nature and normally can be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital assets (i.e. roads, bridges, tunnels, drainage systems, water and sewer systems, dams, and lighting systems). As a general rule, the cost of buildings associated with infrastructure should be reported separately as buildings rather than as part of the cost of the infrastructure. The exception to this rule is buildings that are purely ancillary to a network or subsystem of infrastructure (e.g., road maintenance structures such as shops and garages associated with a highway system and water pumping stations associated with water systems). Examples of infrastructure assets include: • Roads, streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks • Bridges • Water and sanitary sewer systems • Drainage and storm water systems • Street light systems • Signage 6. Other assets This asset class is used for assets that do not fit into one of the other major asset classes. It also includes computer software that is either purchased or developed for internal use, which should be capitalized if the cost of the software exceeds the capitalization threshold and is depreciated over the software's estimated useful life. Capitalization of computer software includes software license fees if the total dollar amount of the fee divided by the number of units or terminals exceeds the threshold. Examples of expenditures to be capitalized as computer software include: • External direct costs of materials and services, i.e., third -party fees for services • Costs to obtain software from third parties • Travel costs incurred by employees in their duties directly associated with development • Payroll and payroll -related costs of employees directly associated with or devoting time to encoding, installing, or testing • Costs to develop or obtain software that allows for access or conversion of old data by new information systems Note that upgrades and enhancements should only be capitalized to the extent that they increase the functionality of the product. 7. Construction in progress This asset class is used for costs incurred to construct or develop an asset before it is substantially ready to be placed into service (at which time it is reclassified into the appropriate major asset class). Section IV: Depreciating Capital Assets Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of a tangible asset to the periods of benefit. Capital assets shall be depreciated over their estimated useful live with exception of the following: Inexhaustible assets, i.e., land, and land improvements that do not require maintenance or replacement, e.g., certain works of art and historical treasures Construction work -in -progress For financial purposes, the City will use the straight-line method of depreciation, which allocates the cost evenly over the life of the asset. Generally, at the end of an asset's life, the sum of the amounts charged for depreciation in each accounting period, or accumulated depreciation, will equal the original cost less salvage value. 0 Section V: Capital Assets Estimated Useful Life The City's capital assets are depreciated over the following estimated useful lives derived from the Internal Revenue Service Alternative Depreciation System (ADS): Land Indefinite life, not depreciated Buildings and Building Improvements Buildings 40 years Temporary and portable buildings 25 years Roof 20 years HVAC (heating, ventilation, air conditioning) 20 years Electrical 20 years Plumbing 20 years Sprinkler system 20 years Elevators 20 years Floor covering other than carpet 15 years Interior construction 15 years Security and fire alarm system 10 years Cabling 10 years Interior renovation 10 years Carpeting 7 years Other buildings and building improvements not listed above 7-40 years Improvements Other Than Buildings (Land Improvements) Fencing and gates 20 years Landscaping 20 years Outdoor sprinkler and irrigation systems 20 years Golf courses 20 years Swimming pools, tennis and basketball courts, skate parks 20 years Fountains 20 years Retaining walls 20 years Outdoor lighting 20 years Recreation areas and athletic fields, including bleachers 15 years Paths and trails 15 years Septic systems 15 years Other improvements not listed above 15-20 years Machinery and Equipment Outdoor equipment (playgrounds, scoreboards) 15 years Firefighting trucks 15 years Athletic equipment 10 years Telecommunications equipment 10 years Fire department equipment 10 years Furniture and fixtures (excluding structural components) 10 years Grounds equipment (mowers, tractors, bobcats) 10 years Kitchen equipment (appliances) 10 years Lab equipment 10 years Law enforcement equipment 10 years Custodial equipment 10 years Business machines and office equipment 7 years Audio visual equipment 6 years 7 Heavy general purpose truck and equipment (weight > 13,OOOlbs) Cars, light general purpose trucks (weight < 13,OOOlbs) Photocopiers Computer equipment and software (servers, network equipment, large software packages such as document management software) Machinery, tools, and other equipment not listed above Infrastructure and Other Improvements Water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer systems Roads, streets, curb, and gutter Sidewalks Bridges Parking lots, driveways, and parking barriers Other infrastructure and improvements not listed above N 6 years 5 years 5 years 5 years 5 years 50 years 20 years 20 years 20 years 15 years 15-50 years WS — Item 8 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 8 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director Re: Blue Heron Days Discussion Background Last Fall, Councilmember Stoesz and I attended a meeting to recap the 2021 Blue Heron Days events. A common theme among various community leaders and civic organizations was to create a committee to discuss all facets of the 2022 Blue Heron Days celebration. Potential topics include setting the dates, parade route location, identifying potential event along with locations, coordinating all events in a logistical manner, marketing, etc. Staff is requesting feedback on whether the City Council is supportive of forming a Blue Heron Days Committee. If so, appointing one or two council members would be appropriate. Also, any overall direction (i.e. selecting dates, dictating parade route, etc.) would be helpful. WS — Item 9 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 9 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: John Swenson, Public Safety Director Re: Coss Family Foundation Donation Background The Coss Family Foundation has made previous monetary donation to the City of Lino Lakes in support of the police canine program within the Public Safety Department. This foundation would like to donate $20,000 for the purchase of needed police equipment. Staff has evaluated the equipment within the Police Division and determined that patrol rifles currently deployed within our community need to be replaced. These patrol rifles were purchased in November, 2002. Attached is detailed Patrol Rifle Proposal prepared by Public Safety staff. If Council is supportive of accepting this donation and moving forward with the purchase of the patrol rifles, staff will place this on the February 14, 2022 Council agenda for formal acceptance of the donation. Attachments None WS — Item 10 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 10 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: John Swenson, Public Safety Director Re: Shield 616 Donation Background Shield 616 is a non-profit out of Colorado that fundraises and purchases rifle rated ballistic body armor and donates these items to police and firefighters throughout the nation. Lino Lakes Volunteers in Public Safety (LLVIPS) is partnering with Shield 616 as the benefactor of this years "Guns and Hoses" hockey game. As a reminder LLVIPS is also a registered non-profit with a board consisting of individuals that volunteer in various roles in the Lino Lakes community. LLVIPS and Shield 616 plan to use the Guns and Hoses fundraiser to outfit police and firefighters with rifle rated ballistic armor for agencies participating in the Guns and Hoses fundraiser. At this point, they believe they have received enough donations to outfit every police and firefighter that will play in the hockey game on February 25th as well as start to outfit other police and firefighters from agencies that have players skating in the game. There are three police officers and three firefighters from Lino Lakes skating in the Guns and Hoses game on February 25th. If the City Council accepts the donation from Shield 616 for rifle rated ballistic armor, these six individuals would be the first to be outfitted with the ballistic armor package. The ballistic armor package includes Angel Armor RISE 2.0 level IIIa body armor with rifle rated Truth SNAP plates and Galvion's level IIIa helmet with upgraded harness system. The cost of the armor package is $2,300 per package. Here are the links to Shield 616 and Guns-n-Hoses event for additional details. If Council is supportive of accepting this donation, staff will place this on the February 14, 2022 Council agenda for formal acceptance of the donation. Attachments None. WS — Item 11 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 11 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: John Swenson, Public Safety Director Re: Public Safety Update Update Staff will be on hand to present the 41h Quarter 2021 Public Safety Update. Attachments Q4 Quarterly Report Lino Lakes Public �4,yZC SgF�� - C I T Y O F Safety Department QUARTERLY REPORT f RN�L KES N KE 2021 Q4 10/1/2021-12/31/2021 166 RTIv CASE NUMBERS GENERATED YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 2,766 3,027 3,338 3,007 12,138 20210 3,348 3,476 3,422 1 2,968 13,214 STACKED CALLS REPORT Ql I Q2 I Q3 I Q4 TOTAL 2021 9:50:25 22:07:41 33:39:48 46:27:26 112:05:20 • Average Response Time (emergency & non -emergency) 6 minutes and 41 seconds. MEDICAL CALLS FOR SERVICE YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 182 205 201 231 819 2020 219 169 109 121 618 • 2021 Q4 Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes and 51 seconds. • 2021 Q4 Average non -emergency response for medicals, 6 minutes and 13 seconds. • Police staff responded to all 231 medical calls for service (CFS) and POC fire staff responded to 13 medical CFS. FIRE DIVISION 9 FIRE DIVISION NFR'S CODE DESCRIPTION Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 P/FF POC P/FF POC P/FF POC P/FF POC 100 Fire 4 4 10 10 27 27 35 35 200 Overpressure Explosion, Overheat - No Fire 0 01 0 01 2 21 1 1 300 Rescue & EMS Incidents 36 35 43 42 112 109 134 130 400 Hazardous Conditions - No Fire 12 9 8 6 31 21 50 37 500 Service Call 15 10 11 6 78 45 72 49 600 Good Intent Call 5 5 16 14 32 21 35 33 700 False Alarms & False Calls 18 51 14 91 88 231 72 41 800 1 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 900 Special Incident 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 90 68 102 87 371 248 399 326 P/FF = Police/Firefighter POC = Paid On Call Firefighters * Please note no medical CFS are included in this table except motor vehicle accidents. , ,—,8:16AM MUTUAL AID GIVEN Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 7 9 7 2 25 2020 5 10 8 3 26 MUTUAL AID RECEIVED Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 2 2 4 4 12 2020 2 7 5 4 18 POLICE DIVISIONPOLICE 4 a�sir Qtr 4 2020 Qtr 4 2021 2020 2021 NIBRS Description - Group A Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Aggravated Assault 9 7 1 1 41 37 15 15 Simple Assault 9 9 9 8 32 26 28 26 hitimidation 6 4 1 1 15 12 13 13 Burglary/Breaking & Entering 1 0 6 0 16 0 25 5 Counterfeiting/Forgery 3 1 1 1 22 7 12 6 Destruction / Damage / Vandalismof Property 33 2 19 0 102 16 80 10 Drugs/Narcotic Violation 25 18 11 10 119 110 100 99 Drug Equipment Violations 19 12 10 10 93 84 84 84 Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Extortion / Blackmail 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 False Pretenses/Swindle/Con 5 0 3 0 22 2 19 2 Credit Card/Automated Teller Machine Fraud 9 2 2 0 17 2 11 2 Wire Fraud 2 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 Impersonation 0 0 1 1 7 5 10 10 Identity Theft 17 0 9 0 60 0 62 2 Kidnapping/Abduction 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter Person 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Shoplifting 7 4 4 2 26 14 25 11 Theft fromBuilding I 0 1 3 0 11 2 1 14 3 Theft from Motor Vehicle 16 I 15 0 45 1 53 3 Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts or Accessories 4 0 4 1 11 0 29 1 All other Larceny 35 2 24 4 118 7 92 15 Motor Vehicle Theft 4 1 4 1 12 3 18 5 Robbery 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Forcible Rape 3 1 1 0 4 1 4 3 Forcible Sodomy 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 Forcible Fondling 2 0 0 0 4 1 3 3 Stolen Property Offenses 1 1 2 1 6 6 15 1 13 Weapon Law Violations 2 2 4 3 9 9 11 10 TOTAL 213 67 136 44 806 351 729 343 So1NeRate 31% 32% 44% 47% Q4 2020 Qtr 4 2021 2020 2021 NIBRSDescription-GroupB Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Bad Checks 3 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 Curfew/Loitering/Vagrancy Violation 3 2 0 0 17 12 3 0 Disorderly Conduct 9 6 9 7 35 18 31 24 Driving Under Influence 36 1 36 22 1 22 132 1 132 122 1 122 Family Offenses, Nonviolent 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Liquor Law Violations 5 3 2 2 22 18 18 18 Trespass of Real Property 1 0 4 3 12 3 6 3 TOTAL 58 48 38 34 223 184 182 168 SOLVERATE 83% 89% 83% 92% Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 2020/2021 Overall Clearance Rate Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Group A 213 67 136 44 806 351 729 343 Group B 58 48 38 34 223 184 182 168 TOTAL 271 115 174 78 1029 535 911 511 SOLVE RATE 42%, 45'%4 52%) 56% Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 2020/2021 Clearance Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Property Crimes 138 14 10"/. 99 11 11% 481 66 14% 468 88 19% Crimes Against People 23 17 74% 11 9 82% 89 70 79% 53 49 92% FELONY CASE FILE SUBMISSIONS YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 15 19 34 14 82 2020 18 28 10 19 75 �,�yZC SAF� CITYI IN KE A.R Lino Lakes Public Safety One Vision. One Mission. Quarterly Update Ending December 31, 2021 John Swenson Public Safety Director its SA CITYY - OF LNOL KES The mission of the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is to collaborate with the community to provide: . a healthy and safe community; . a focus on prevention; . a commitment to life safety; . aggressive pursuit of criminals; • respectful communication; . encouragement for volunteerism. One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES Fourth Quarter Statistics One Vision. One Mission. ;PC S4\ CASE NUMBERS GENERATED YEAR Q 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 2,766 3,027 3,338 3,007 12,138 F2O20 3,348 3,476 3,422 2,968 13,214 Average Response Time (emergency & non -emergency) 6 minutes, 41 seconds STACKED CALLS REPORT Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 : 0:2 22:07:41 : 9:4 46:27:26 112:05:20 One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES MEDICAL CALLS FOR SERVICE ITAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 1 2 205 201 231 819 2020 219 19 109 121 61 • Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes, 51 seconds • Average non -emergency response for medicals, 6 minutes and 13 seconds. • Police staff responded to all 231 medical calls for service (CFS) and POC fire staff responded to 13 medical CFS. One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES FIRE DIVISION NFR'S CODE DESCRIPTION Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 P/FF I POC P/FF POC P/FF POC P/FF POC 100 Fire 4 4 10 10 27 27 35 35 200 Overpressure Explosion, Overheat - No Fire 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 300 Rescue & EMS Incidents 36 35 43 42 112 109 1341 130 400 Hazardous Conditions - No Fire 12 9 8 61 31 21 50 37 500 Service Call 15 10 11 6 78 45 72 49 600 Good Intent Call 5 5 16 14 32 21 35 33 700 False Alarms & False Calls 18 5 14 9 88 23 72 41 800 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 01 0 0 1 0 0 0 900 Special Incident 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 90 68 102 87 371 1 248 399 326 P/FF = Police/Firefighter POC = Paid On Call Firefighters * Please note no medical CFS are included in this table except motor vehicle accidents. One Vision. One Mission. ;PC S4\ MUTUAL AID GIVEN 1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 7 7 - 2 2020 5 1 10 1 8 1 3 ? MUTUAL AID RECEIVED Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOT_al. 2021 2 2 4 4 12 2020 2 7 5 4 18 One Vision. One Mission. Group A Offenses and Arrests: ;PC S4\ CITY _ OF LNCIL, KES �ARTTIL`/ Qtr 42020 Qtr 42021 2020 2021 NIBRSDescliptiou- GroupA Off Arrest Off Arrest OR Arrest off Arrest Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Agg—ledAssault 9 7 1 1 41 37 15 15 Simple Assault 9 9 9 8 32 26 28 26 Intimidation 6 4 1 1 15 12 13 13 BurglarylBreaId.g&Entering 1 0 6 0 16 0 25 5 Counterfeiting5orgery 3 1 I 1 22 7 12 6 Destmction I Damage/ V dalism of Property 33 2 19 0 102 16 80 10 DmgslNarcotk Volation 25 18 11 IQ 119 LID IOO 99 Drug Equipment Volations 19 12 IO ID 93 84 84 84 Embezzlement 0 O 0 0 2 0 0 O Extortion I BI-email 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 O False Pretens-s SwindlelCon 5 Q 3 0 22 2 19 2 Credit Ca&Automated Teller Machine Frand 9 2 2 0 17 2 Il 2 WireFraud 2 Q 2 0 2 0 3 0 Impersonation 0 Q I 1 7 5 IQ 10 Identily Theft 17 Q 9 0 60 0 62 2 YidnappinglAbduction 0 Q 0 0 2 1 0 Q Murder& Nonnegligent Manslaughter Person 0 Q 0 0 1 1 0 Q Shopldling 7 4 4 2 26 14 25 11 Th eft from Building 1 0 3 0 11 2 14 3 Th eft from Motor VAide 16 1 15 0 45 1 53 3 Th eft of Motor Vehicle Parts or Accessories 4 0 4 1 11 0 29 1 All oth er Larceny 35 2 24 4 Its 7 92 15 Motor Vehice Th eft 4 1 4 1 12 3 18 5 Robbery 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Q Forcible Rape 3 1 1 0 4 1 4 3 D—ible Sodomy 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 Forcible Fondling 2 0 0 0 4 1 3 3 Stolen Progeny Offenses 1 1 2 1 6 6 15 13 Weapon Law Volations 2 2 4 1 3 1 9 1 9 Il IO TOTAL 213 1 67 136 1 44 806 351 729 1 343 SdreRme 31% 32% 44 One Vision. One Mission. ;PC S4\ CITY _ 0 F LNGL, KES �ARTTI�% Group B Offenses and Arrests: Q4 2020 Qtr 42021 2Q20 2021 TSIBRSDes cription-GroupB Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Bad Checks 3 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 CurfeN 'Loitering:'N agranc-�, 'violation 3 2 0 0 17 12 3 0 Disorderly Conduct 9 6 9 7 35 19 31 24 Driving Under lnfluence 36 36 22 22 132 132 122 12, Family Offenses, Nonviolent 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Liquor Law iriolations 5 3 _ _ 22 is is is Trespass of Real Property 1 0 4 _ 12 1 3 1 6 3 TOTAL 58 48 3 5 34 223 1 s4 182 16SS SOLIT RATE 83% 89% 83% 92% Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 2020/2021 Overall Clearance Rate Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Group A 213 67 136 44 806 351 729 343 Group B 58 48 38 34 223 184 182 168 TOTAL 271 1 115 174 78 1029 535 911 1 511 SOLVE RATE 42% 45% 52% 56% One Vision. One Mission. ;Pc S4 \ CITY _ 0 F LNCIL, KES �ARTTI�% Q4 2020 Q4 2021 2020 2021 2020/2021 Ciearance Rate Off Arrest Sa1TeRate Off Arrest S olve Rate Off Arrest SolveRate Off Arrest S olveRAe Property Crimes 138 14 10% 99 11 11% 481 66 14% 468 88 19% Q'm7es Against People 23 17 74% 11 9 S2% 89 70 79% 53 49 92% FELONY CASE FILE SUBMISSIONS YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2021 15 19 34 14 82 2020 18 28 10 19 75 i� One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES Public Safety Staff Update ■ Police — 25 personnel (authorized 28 as of 7-1-2022) ■ Fire — 22 personnel (authorized 1 FTE, 40 Paid -on -Call Firefighters, FT Lieutenant as of 3-1-2022 and 10 PT Firefighters as of 5-1-2022) ■ Administration — 6 personnel (authorized 4 FTE, 3 part-time) ■ Two Police Officers currently in field training. ■ Police Officer Kevin Tracy will start on February 14, 2022. ■ One Community Service Officer in background investigation. ■ Anticipate seeking Council approval at the February 14th Council meeting to hire one Police Officer and one CSO. One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES Public Safety Staff Update Fire Division Daytime Duty Crew ■ Council approved the promotion of Brian Finke to Fire Lieutenant / Inspector at the January 24, 2022 Council meeting. ■ Part -Time Firefighters: ■ Total # of applicants as of 1/23/2022 was 19. ■ 18 candidates were interviewed. ■ 13 background investigations on -going. ■ Projecting to seek Council hiring authorization by April 11, 2022 with a start date of May 2, 2022. One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITYY - OF LNOL KES 4th Quarter Notable Events ■ Personal Safety & Scam Awareness Event ■ Snowmobile Safety Course ■ Coffee with a Cop — Starbucks ■ Lino Lakes Elementary Truck Tour ■ Fire Sprinkler Demonstration One Vision. One Mission. its SA CITY,r OF LNOL KES 2021 Areas of Focus • Employee Wellness • Fire Prevention Programming • Train all police staff on crisis intervention and de-escalation techniques • Community Communication Strategies One Vision. One Mission. WS — Item 12 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 12 Date: February 7, 2022 To: City Council From: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator Re: Strategic Planning/Goal Setting Background The City Council has expressed interest in scheduling a strategic planning/goal setting session. The last one was conducted in 2017 by Richard Fursman of Hue Life. The Council and staff participated in two workshop sessions and completed the Vision and Environmental Assessment, but the Implementation Plan was not completed (See Attached). In preparation for a goal setting session, staff would prepare to provide their perspective on current and emerging issues within their respective departments. This information may be helpful for the Council for consideration in formulating goals and establishing priorities. Requested Council Direction Consider scheduling tentative dates/times for a goal setting session and discuss whether a facilitator should be brought in to assist. Attachments 2017 Goal Setting Draft Vision, Environmental Scan, and Implementation Plan WE WAIT wV WHAT ►EEZ✓ PL&E in 3-5 }brs hSARtw[IcFoWAclav Ar TK5 RfRMT? r. Contents Page Vision....................................1 Environmental Scan .......... 2 Focus Areas 12-18 months 3 OQrl1�Y Ca µ µwn�c�rt4. 1&rv,e S4% 7a 1,d ton �Pn1oa�TL�Fs �i-,l — 5 Y e� a / PRACTICAL VISION The vision of an organization is held in part by all of its members. This workshop was held with the council and staff to create their shared picture of the future. The practical vision is the responsive statement of hope within the given environment. It provides a sense of the destination of the effort. It tells us where we are going, what the accomplishments, outcomes, changes and results are that we are seeking by our efforts. The vision was set for 2022. In 2022, The City of Lino Lakes has/is.... Will.. -. . Efficiently run Recruit and retain Three strong, Neighborhood Trail system that Develop a 60-acre A variety of city that meets talented workforce attractive enhancement connects parks, recreational community type the needs of that is sized to meet commercial zones program dedicated neighborhoods, complex with a events and the growing community offering a variety to revitalizing and and regional trails multi functional opportunities for community expectations and of activities and maintaining our to create a community center residents to come needs opportunities while aging borderless park together increasing the tax neighborhoods system base - Streamline - Staff recruitment and 49&J redevelopment - Neighborhood - Completion of trail - Develop athletic - More community budget process retention program to Commercial revitalization in oldest from Main Street to complex/community engagement (i.e. town hall - Funding attract and retain top development NE Sector areas Lake Street center meetings) reallocation that is talent of town - Update antiquated - Complete needed - Phase I of Rec - Conduct comprehensive priority based - Correlate staffing with - Develop Legacy playground equipment trails Complex community survey - Define use of development and commercial component - Continuing to expand - Begin develop - Weekly/ monthly music excess reserves community needs - Ash & Hodgson and connect park/rec complex in the park - Plan now for - Complete conversion of development neighborhoods - Development of Rec Freshen Blue Heron days "big" community files to electronic format - Establish business park Build Main Street trail complex War memorial needs/goals - Balance proactive and on 35E Develop parks: - Get our 5-year reactive public safety Increase the tax base Northpointe, Woods CIP in place 49 Club replacement Edge & Century Farms - Implement storm water utility fee Page 1 1 / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - WHAT IS OUR CURRENT REALITY IN RELATIONSHIP TO OUR PRACTICAL VISION? CURRENT REALITY IN THE ARENA • • • Enjoyable, Connected Community Trusting Governance Organization Developing Community Strengths: Weaknesses: Strengths: Weaknesses: Strengths: Weaknesses: -Current Park/Trail - Community -Strong financial - Lack of investment -Improving Economy - Lack of utilities System engagement position - Staff/Council working - Shovel ready - High water table -Growing community - Lack of funding/ - Educational system relationship - Proximity to metro/ - Community - Community commitment - Staff/council work interstate opposition engagement relationship - Land - Market - Environmental - Bond rating attributes - Available labor pool Opportunities: Threats/ Challenges: Opportunities: Threats/ Challenges: Opportunities: Threats/ - Development - Funding - Stronger economy - Weak economy - A lot of interest Challenges: - Maintain/repair - Too many needs - Growing community - Increase in property - Bad economy - Increasing tax values - Improving tax base values - Charter - Land — ability to build - Budget process - Growing community limitations new parks - Geographic division/lakes Page 12 / FOCUSED IMPLEMENTATION 1 12-18 Months Actions In the Focused Implementation workshop, participants are asked to focus on the near future to identify success and practical actions that will move the organization towards its practical vision. By planning strategically, that is, in relation to its real situation and the underlying challenges and its practical vision, the community has a chance to realize its vision. This workshop asks the question: What actions can we take in the next 12-18 months to move us toward success? 12-18 Month Actions 1.1 Prioritize plan for trail connections (including funding) 1.2 Engage champions for the Community Center project - Engage public — people drive conversation - Divide into pieces - Look at other parts of the City (two parts of the City) 1.3 Complete plan for War Memorial, including funding Page 13 2 Years Success - Build Some Trail Connections aLfkt�6 1� 1 - Plan for Community Center 3-A d stmf. in place and presented to public with fiscal plan and get Q>"nerm0N5 it startedn -�.- Cd,,,,.,,,. 46 ENc�t �vblic - Find Funding for War Memorial Park Cemcc'm T!Ace 10liO Rein{ed �`'` limns a�a (w�ixal i (ar } d'V% mic �ece3 Cz S,es �,�a CS,Qms+ Fefi `I UFA. WRe M�r►o�A�'?A2'� WAR MgnoR�P.� r��1Y°j FOCUS AREA: Trusting Governance/Organization Current Reality 12-18 Month Actions 2 Years Success Page 14 Date: To: From: Re: Background WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 13 February 7, 2022 Clty COUnCll Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director Rookery Update WS — Item 13 The Rookery Advisory Board met last week and discussed several items including operating hours, membership fees, administrative office improvements, flooring for multi -purpose room and Childwatch area, LED lighting changeout, waterslide refurbish update, exterior signage update, the Security System Proposal. Staff is recommending the following hours of operation for the Rookery Activity Center, subject to change: Monday — Friday S:OOam - 1 O:OOpm Saturday — Sunday o mam - B : OOpm Staff is also recommending the City Council approve the attached membership rates, subject LU change. ACTIVITY CENTER Services Included in Membership Memberships include full use of the Rookery Activity Center including fitness floor, pool, gymnasium, and locker rooms. Membership also includes access to all basic fitness classes, open gym and open swim, use of a daily locker, and free guest passes. Towel service, drop in child care, premium fitness classes, swim programs, and other recreational programs will be available for an additional cost. Membership Anyone is welcome to join the Rookery Activity Center. Memberships can be purchased via automatic monthly Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) or pay in advance for 1 full year. Membership Definitions —these definitions apply to all memberships, multi -visit passes, or drop -in passes. • Resident —anyone living within the city limits of Lino Lakes. Must provide proof of residency to receive resident rate. Proof could be driver's license, utility bill, or cable bill. • Non -Resident — anyone living outside the city limits of Lino Lakes. • Adult - Anyone ages 18 - 61. • Dual Any 2 individuals living in the same household. Both individuals must provide proof of household. • Senior —Ages 62+, must provide proof of age. • Youth —Ages 18 and under; members age 14 and under require adult supervision. • Family - One or two adults and dependent children age 18 and under who are living in the same household. Parental supervision is required for children age 14 and under. Need to provide proof of family. • Military Active and retired military receive 10% discount on adult, dual, senior, and family membership categories; discount does not apply to daily drop -in or multi -visit passes. Discharge papers, military DD-214, or current military ID are required to receive this discount. Monthly Membership Prices Adult Dual Senior^ Youth Family Military $100 10% off rate $36 $120 % off rate * All rates do not include tax and are subject to change. February 4, 2022 Monthly Membership Information • ASilverSneakers/Optum/other senior fitness benefit programs are eligible at The Rookery Activity Center. Membership includes access to all activity spaces, locker rooms, and basic group fitness classes for all qualifying adults. • Monthly membership requires an electronic payment on file (credit card). A $30 fee will be assessed to any membership payment which is declined or returned. • Monthly membership requires a 3-month minimum term. After 3-months the membership can be cancelled at anytime per the cancellation policy. • Upon signing up to the Rookery Activity Center new members will be charged a prorated fee for the first month of membership based on enrollment date. • Monthly billing will occur on the 1st of each month. • Adult, Dual, Senior, and Youth Monthly Memberships include 1 guest pass per quarter. Family Monthly Memberships include 3 guest passes per quarter, passes must be used within a year of issue date. • Members receive priority registration for swimming lessons, fitness classes and other activity center programming. • Requests to cancel membership must be received in writing by the 15t" of the month to cancel the next month billing. Annual Membership Rates Adult Dual Senior Youth Family $605 $902 $440 $330 $1,100 � Military 10% off rate _10% off rate * All rates do not include tax and are subject to change. Annual Membership Information • Annual memberships require full payment on membership enrollment date. • The rates are priced to receive one month free by purchasing the annual membership. • Memberships are valid for 1 full year from enrollment date. • Adult, dual, senior, and youth memberships include 4 guest passes per year. Family membership includes 12 guest passes per year, passes must be used prior to membership expiration date. • Members receive priority registration for swimming lessons, fitness classes and other activity center programming. • Requests to cancel must be received in writing. Membership cancellations received prior to membership expiration date will incur 3-month termination penalty. Enrollment Fee A one-time $39 Enrollment Fee will be charged upon enrollment. February 4, 2022 Multi -Visit Pass (10 Visits) Rates Senior/Youth Multi -Visit Pass (10 Visits) Information • Multi -Visit passes are good for 10 visits to the Rookery Activity Center. • Multi -Visit passes will expire one-year from the date of purchase. • Multi -Visit passes will provide visitors access to fitness center, basic fitness classes, open gym, and open swim. • Pass holders are required to follow all rules and policies of the Rookery Activity Center. Daily Drop -In Rates 11 wily adult $Zo $1z Youth $7 $8 Daily Drop -In Information • Any non-member is welcome to purchase a Daily Drop -In pass. • The drop -in pass provides access to fitness center, basic fitness classes, open gym, and open swim. • Non-members are required to follow all rules and policies of the Rookery Activity Center. • Non-members may be eligible for premium programming at the non-member rates to join classes or programs when available. • Non -Members also may purchase towel service while in the Rookery. Drop -in Child Watch Program • Childcare is available to members of The Rookery Activity Center. • Rates are per child/stay. • 2 %2 hour maximum stay for any child. • Payment due at drop-off and is non-refundable. • Parent/Guardians must stay inside the Rookery Activity Center while child is in child watch. Towel Service Premium Fitness Classes (i.e. Kettlebells) • Not included with membership. Ron to provide fee schedule. Spinning Classes Not included with membership. Personal and Specialty Training • Not included with membership. Ron to provide fee schedule. Ron to provide fee schedule. February 4, 2022