HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-14-2022 Council Packet EXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 14, 2022
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Sarah Cotton
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers (not televised)
1. Review Regular Agenda
2. The Rookery Hiring Update, Meg Sawyer
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call - Ruhland, Stoesz, Cavegn, Lyden, Rafferty were present
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment (in person or received in writing prior to meeting)
There were no comments
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
The agenda was accepted as presented
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 14, 2022 (Check No. 115813 through 115920) in the Amount of
$962,072.38
B) Consider Approval of January 24, 2022 Council Work Session Minutes
C) Consider Approval of January 24, 2022 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider Resolution No. 22-XX, Approving Settlement Agreement with Peltier
Lake LLC, NE Lino Drainage Area Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
E) Consider Resolution No. 22-22, Electing the Standard Allowance Available under
the Revenue Loss Provision of the American Rescue Plan Act
F) Consider Adopting Capital Asset Policy
G) Consider Approval of Operating Hours and Membership Rates for The Rookery
Activity Center
H) Consider Approval of Settlement Agreement, St. Clair Land Company
I) Consider Approval of Monetary Donation from Coss Family Foundation
J) Consider Approval of Blakely LaCroix to the Economic Development Advisory
Committee
Council Agenda -2-
K) Consider Approval of Resolution 22-25, Individual Massage License for Chanel
Littleton, Allure Salon
L) Consider Approval of Civic Complex Renovation Expenditures
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Cavegn, to approve
Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1L, as presented, was adopted
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Approval of the 2022 Pay Equity Report, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Lyden, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
the report as presented, was adopted
B) Consider the Appointment of Community Service Officer, Meg Sawyer
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
the appointment of Amanda Ulvenes as recommended, was adopted
C) Consider the Appointment of Public Works Superintendent, Meg Sawyer
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Cavegn, to approve
the appointment of Justin Williams as recommended, was adopted
D) Consider the Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker, Meg Sawyer
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Lyden, to approve
the appointment of Gavin Anderson as recommended, was adopted
E) Consider the Appointment of Police Officer, Meg Sawyer
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Lyden, to approve
the appointment of Matthew Reineke as recommended, was adopted
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider acceptance of Shield 616 Donation, John Swenson
Action Taken: Motion by Lyden, seconded by Stoesz, to accept the donation
as requested, was adopted
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-24, Accepting bids, Awarding a
Construction Contract, Water Tower No. 2 Reconditioning Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
Resolution No. 22-24 as recommended, was adopted
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates, Katie Larsen
i) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-16 Approving PUD Final Plan/Final
Plat
Council Agenda -3-
ii) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-17 Approving Development
Agreement
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Lyden, to approve
Resolution No. 22-16 as presented, was adopted
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Lyden, to approve
Resolution No. 22-17 as presented, was adopted
B) 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project, Diane Hankee
i) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-20, Accepting bids, Awarding a
Construction Contract
ii) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-21, Approving Construction Services
Contract with WSB & Associates
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
Resolution No. 22-20 as presented, was adopted
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
Resolution No. 22-21 as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-23, Order Project, Approve the Plans and
Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility
Project, Diane Hankee
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
Resolution No. 22-23 including seeking an alternate in the bidding process,
was adopted
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
Update on The Rookery Activity Center, Sarah Cotton
Adjournment
Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Lyden, to adjourn at 7:25 p.m. was adopted
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
February 14, 2022 through February 28, 2022
Monday, February 21 CITY HALL CLOSED President’s Day
Wednesday, February 23 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board
Monday, February 28 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, February 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting
Updated 2/11/2022
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 14, 2022
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Sarah Cotton
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers (not televised)
1. Review Regular Agenda
2. The Rookery Hiring Update, Meg Sawyer
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment (in person or received in writing prior to meeting)
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 14, 2022 (Check No. 115813 through 115920) in the Amount of
$962,072.38
B) Consider Approval of January 24, 2022 Council Work Session Minutes
C) Consider Approval of January 24, 2022 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider Resolution No. 22-XX, Approving Settlement Agreement with Peltier Lake
LLC, NE Lino Drainage Area Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
E) Consider Resolution No. 22-22, Electing the Standard Allowance Available under
the Revenue Loss Provision of the American Rescue Plan Act
F) Consider Adopting Capital Asset Policy
G) Consider Approval of Operating Hours and Membership Rates for The Rookery
Activity Center
H) Consider Approval of Settlement Agreement, St. Clair Land Company
I) Consider Approval of Monetary Donation from Coss Family Foundation
J) Consider Approval of Blakely LaCroix to the Economic Development Advisory
Committee
Council Agenda -2-
K) Consider Approval of Resolution 22-25, Individual Massage License for Chanel
Littleton, Allure Salon
L) Consider Approval of Civic Complex Renovation Expenditures
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Approval of the 2022 Pay Equity Report, Sarah Cotton
B) Consider the Appointment of Community Service Officer, Meg Sawyer
C) Consider the Appointment of Public Works Superintendent, Meg Sawyer
D) Consider the Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker, Meg Sawyer
E) Consider the Appointment of Police Officer, Meg Sawyer
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider acceptance of Shield 616 Donation, John Swenson
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-24, Accepting bids, Awarding a
Construction Contract, Water Tower No. 2 Reconditioning Project, Diane Hankee
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates, Katie Larsen
i) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-16 Approving PUD Final Plan/Final
Plat
ii) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-17 Approving Development
Agreement
B) 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project, Diane Hankee
i) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-20, Accepting bids, Awarding a
Construction Contract
ii) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-21, Approving Construction Services
Contract with WSB & Associates
C) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-23, Order Project, Approve the Plans and
Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility
Project, Diane Hankee
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Council Agenda -3-
Adjournment
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
February 14, 2022 through February 28, 2022
Monday, February 21 CITY HALL CLOSED President’s Day
Wednesday, February 23 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board
Monday, February 28 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, February 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting
WS – Item 2
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 2
Date: February 14, 2022
To: City Council
From: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
Re: The Rookery Hiring Update
Background
Staff has been working to identify key positions for the Rookery Activity Center. With
the assistance of the Isaac Sports Group’s Feasibility Study, we were able to develop a
list of key full time positions to hire:
Activity Center Manager – Lisa Lamey
Activity Center Coordinator (2)
Aquatics Supervisor
Admin/Accounting/Human Resources
Building Maintenance/Operations Supervisor
Building Maintenance/Custodial Worker (2)
We are currently interviewing six candidates for the Aquatics Supervisor. We are
accepting applications for two Activity Center Coordinator positions. We are in the
process of developing positions descriptions and wage scales for the rest of the full time
positions.
In addition to those full-time positions, we are also developing positions descriptions and
wage scales for the following part-time positions:
Front Desk Worker(s)
Child Watch Lead
Child Watch Worker(s)
Recreation Programming
Custodial/Maintenance Worker(s)
Head Lifeguard
Lifeguards
Swim Instructors
Requested Council Direction
For discussion purposes only
Expenditures
February 14, 2022
Check #115813 to #115920
$962,072.38
City of Lino Lakes
Activity Codes
Code Description Code Description
401 Mayor/Council 817 Spring Fling
402 Administration 818 Winter Festival
403 Elections 819 Community Gardens
404 Cable TV 822 Family Corn Roast
405 Charter Administration 827 Gobbler Games
407 Finance 830 Adult Golf Lessons
414 Legal Consultants 835 Youth Skating Class
415 Economic Development 850 Golf Academy
416 Planning & Zoning 856 Youth Soccer
417 Engineering 857 Soccer Fundamentals
418 Community Development 860 Secret Shop
420 Police Protection 864 Preschool Playtime
421 Fire Protection 868 Little Goblins Party
422 Building Inspections 871 Flag Football
430 Streets 875 Snow Day
431 Fleet Management 876 Kite Day
432 Government Buildings 877 Rockin' in the Park
450 Parks 879 Movies in the Park
451 Recreation 890 Senior Programs
461 Environmental
462 Solid Waste Abatement
463 Forestry
494 Water
495 Sanitary Sewer
499 Other
802 Dodgeball Camp
806 Youth T-Ball
808 Youth Baseball Camp
810 Youth Playground
811 Youth Safety Camp
812 Youth Art Camps
814 Senior Programs/Book Club
AP Checks by Account Number
2/14/2022 City Council Meeting
Vendor Fund/Dept Account Amount Check # Description
AFLAC 101-000 101-000-2040-000 310.22 115823 Insurance Premiums
AFSCME Council #5 101-000 101-000-2040-000 537.60 115815 PR Batch 00001.02.2022 Union Dues AFSCME
Central Pension Fund 101-000 101-000-2040-000 4,992.00 115813 January Central Pension Fund
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-000 101-000-2040-000 370.46 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
International Union 101-000 101-000-2040-000 560.00 115816 PR Batch 00001.02.2022 Union Dues 49ers
Law Enforcement Labor Services 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,430.00 115817 PR Batch 00001.02.2022 Union Dues LELS
Medica 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,690.72 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
NCPERS Group Life Insurance 101-000 101-000-2040-000 272.00 115814 January Insurance Premiums
Medica 101-000 101-000-2041-000 8,410.34 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-000 101-000-2044-000 1,163.48 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. 101-000 101-000-2048-000 100.69 115854 February Vision Insurance
Met Council Environmental Services (SAC) 101-000 101-000-2120-000 258,440.00 115889 Jan 2022 SAC
SMC Construction LLC 101-000 101-000-3250-000 63.20 115908 Refund for Permit #2022-00044
Bonfe's Plumbing Heating & Air Service 101-000 101-000-3253-000 55.20 115833 Voided permit and issued refund for 80% of permit
Met Council Environmental Services (SAC) 101-000 101-000-3414-000 -2,584.40 115889 Jan 2022 SAC
101-000 Total 275,811.51
Medica 101-402 101-402-4131-000 570.73 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-402 101-402-4134-000 89.89 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
First Advantage Occ. 101-402 101-402-4300-000 75.26 115856 Drug Testing
Martin-McAllister 101-402 101-402-4300-000 1,100.00 115883 Public Safety Assessment - M. DuBois & B. Kisch
Occupational Health Centers of MN P.C. 101-402 101-402-4300-000 31.50 115897 New Hire Testing
Occupational Health Centers of MN P.C. 101-402 101-402-4300-000 31.50 115897 New Hire Testing
MRPA 101-402 101-402-4340-000 225.00 115895 Job Posting - Activity Center Manager
MRPA 101-402 101-402-4340-000 225.00 115895 Job Posting - Aquatics Supervisor
GovOffice LLC 101-402 101-402-4410-000 2,425.00 115862 Annual Hosting Fee
Shred-it c/o Stericycle Inc. 101-402 101-402-4410-000 28.05 115906 Document destruction
101-402 Total 4,801.93
Medica 101-407 101-407-4131-000 2,206.76 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-407 101-407-4134-000 101.11 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Storey Kenworthy/Matt Parrott 101-407 101-407-4200-000 254.70 115910 2021 W-2's & 1099's
City of Roseville 101-407 101-407-4310-000 14,030.73 115841 February IT Services
101-407 Total 16,593.30
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-414 101-414-4301-000 499.60 115903 October Legal - Miscellaneous
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-414 101-414-4301-000 2,293.00 115903 November Legal - Miscellaneous
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-414 101-414-4301-000 187.60 115903 December Legal - Miscellaneous
GDO Law 101-414 101-414-4303-000 8,750.00 115859 February Prosecutor Contract
101-414 Total 11,730.20
Kennedy & Graven Chartered 101-415 101-415-4300-000 41.00 115874 Data Practices
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-415 101-415-4300-000 48.00 115903 December Legal - Vaquero Ventures Land Sale
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-415 101-415-4300-000 48.00 115903 October Legal - Vaquero Ventures Land Sale
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 101-415 101-415-4300-000 16.00 115903 November Legal - Vaquera Ventures Land Sale
MN Metro North Tourism Board 101-415 101-415-4900-000 4,950.00 115893 95% of Hampton Inn Check
101-415 Total 5,103.00
Medica 101-416 101-416-4131-000 570.72 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-416 101-416-4134-000 44.94 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-416 101-416-4300-000 363.00 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-416 101-416-4300-000 302.50 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-416 101-416-4300-000 363.00 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
101-416 Total 1,644.16
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 302.50 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 61.00 115918 December Traffic Safety Committee
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 3,981.00 115918 December Stormwater Management Utility Credits
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 302.50 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 451.00 115918 December Miscellaneous Escrow Account
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 2,051.00 115918 December 2022 Standard Specification Update
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4410-000 5,180.00 115918 December General Engineering Services
101-417 Total 12,329.00
Medica 101-418 101-418-4131-000 570.73 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-418 101-418-4134-000 44.94 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-418 Total 615.67
Medica 101-420 101-420-4131-000 17,757.67 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-420 101-420-4134-000 1,058.36 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-420 101-420-4200-000 321.04 115873 Toner tape scissor pen
Carlson Matthew 101-420 101-420-4211-000 27.83 115837 Oil for patrol snowmobile for safety training
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-420 101-420-4211-000 32.14 115873 Hand sanitizer
Nardini Fire Equipment Co 101-420 101-420-4211-000 177.46 115896 Fire extinguisher maintenance
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4213-000 61.95 115829 Uniform allowance - Explorers
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-420 101-420-4300-000 16.48 115827 Dec 2021 Language Line
LEAST Services/Counseling LLC 101-420 101-420-4300-000 75.00 115879 Counseling Services - December
Anoka County Chiefs of Police Association 101-420 101-420-4330-000 215.40 115826 2021 Meeting Expenses
League of Minnesota Cities 101-420 101-420-4330-000 2,340.00 115878 PATROL Subscription
Menards - Forest Lake 101-420 101-420-4330-000 81.18 115887 Training supplies
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 849.00 115829 Uniform allowance - Department expense
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 245.00 115829 Uniform allowance - K. Kraemer
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 219.00 115829 Uniform allowance - A. Hallin
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 6.00 115829 Uniform allowance - New Hire S. Bonczek
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 154.94 115829 Uniform allowance - A. Riehm
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 666.54 115829 Uniform allowance - New Hire CSO
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 18.85 115829 Uniform allowance - W. Owens
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 225.00 115829 Uniform allowance - K. Mobraten
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 153.85 115829 Uniform allowance - N. Hamann
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 15.00 115829 Uniform allowance - A. Hallin
Streicher's Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 157.97 115911 Uniform Allowance - K. Sinna
Streicher's Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 368.96 115911 Uniform Allowance - K. Sinna
Streicher's Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 336.93 115911 Uniform Allowance - M. Carlson
Xcel Energy 101-420 101-420-4381-000 4.34 115919 Electric
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4386-000 93.65 115829 Uniform allowance - Reserves
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4386-000 189.55 115829 Uniform allowance - Reserves
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-420 101-420-4410-000 900.00 115827 4th Quarter State Access Fee
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-420 101-420-4410-000 390.00 115834 Replace Check #115730 - CJDN Access Fee
HMS Health LLC 101-420 101-420-4410-000 330.00 115868 PM services on 9 AED's and 1 Cardiac Monitor
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-420 101-420-4410-000 36.00 115890 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/MP 4055SP Copier
Shred-it c/o Stericycle Inc. 101-420 101-420-4410-000 56.10 115906 Document destruction
Trans Union LLC 101-420 101-420-4410-000 32.34 115914 Background Checks
101-420 Total 27,613.53
Medica 101-421 101-421-4131-000 1,537.25 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-421 101-421-4134-000 65.16 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-421 101-421-4211-000 682.17 115880 Head harness SCBA quick fill adapter
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-421 101-421-4211-000 950.00 115880 Firefighting foam
Menards - Forest Lake 101-421 101-421-4211-000 3.48 115887 Bolts for hanging equipment
LEAST Services/Counseling LLC 101-421 101-421-4300-000 75.00 115879 Counseling Services - December
Minnesota Fire Service Certification Board 101-421 101-421-4300-000 360.00 115892 Instructor 1 Certification Exam - L. Evens C. Menne D. Riley
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-421 101-421-4370-000 1,943.34 115880 Firefighter boots
Active911 Inc 101-421 101-421-4410-000 507.00 115821 Traditional subscription for an agency
HMS Health LLC 101-421 101-421-4410-000 330.00 115868 PM services on 9 AED's and 1 Cardiac Monitor
Capital City Firefighter's Association 101-421 101-421-4452-000 50.00 115835 2022 Membership dues - D. L'Allier
101-421 Total 6,503.40
Medica 101-422 101-422-4131-000 2,375.70 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-422 101-422-4134-000 89.88 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Grochala Michael 101-422 101-422-4300-000 415.00 115864 U.S. CAD Bluebeam license for Building Inspector
T-Mobile USA Inc 101-422 101-422-4321-000 148.82 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
101-422 Total 3,029.40
Medica 101-430 101-430-4131-000 2,552.72 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-430 101-430-4134-000 188.75 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Hugo Equipment Company 101-430 101-430-4211-000 37.98 115871 Chainsaw chain
Earl F. Andersen 101-430 101-430-4223-000 141.25 115849 Blind Child Area Sign
City of St. Paul 101-430 101-430-4224-000 195.42 115842 Asphalt Mix
Cargill Inc. 101-430 101-430-4228-000 9,252.36 115836 Deicer 165 620 LB
Cargill Inc. 101-430 101-430-4228-000 14,606.46 115836 Deicer 261 460 LB
T-Mobile USA Inc 101-430 101-430-4321-000 92.39 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
Meridian Energy Products 101-430 101-430-4385-000 112.00 115888 Disconnect and cover wiring for downed street light
Xcel Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 4,492.92 115919 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 865.26 115919 Electric
Olson's Sewer Service Inc. 101-430 101-430-4410-000 539.00 115898 Wastewater removal - 1189 Main Street Holding Tank
101-430 Total 33,076.51
Medica 101-431 101-431-4131-000 2,025.35 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-431 101-431-4134-000 98.88 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Hotsy Equipment of Minnesota 101-431 101-431-4211-000 193.05 115869 Bulk soap
Hotsy Equipment of Minnesota 101-431 101-431-4211-000 437.84 115869 Bulk soap thermostat nozzle clamp hose
Huebsch Services 101-431 101-431-4211-000 161.00 115870 Shop Towels
Safety-Kleen Systems Inc. 101-431 101-431-4211-000 50.42 115904 Solvent
Mansfield Oil Company 101-431 101-431-4212-000 4,600.84 115881 Gasoline - 1 601 gallons
Mansfield Oil Company 101-431 101-431-4212-000 4,637.96 115881 Gasoline - 1 697 gallons
Mansfield Oil Company 101-431 101-431-4212-000 3,510.62 115881 Diesel - 1201 gallons
Aspen Equipment Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 424.60 115828 Cutting edge kit #259
Aspen Equipment Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 253.11 115828 Headlamp control #506
Aspen Equipment Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 -525.90 115828 Western Warranty Credit for Misc. Parts & Labor #268
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 16.00 115853 Poly-V Belts #600
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 277.00 115853 Battery #413
Factory Motor Parts Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 -14.43 115853 Returned control part #600
Gillund Enterprises Inc. 101-431 101-431-4221-000 251.96 115860 Rust penetrant carb cleaner
H&L Mesabi Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 1,100.00 115865 Plow wing cutting edges
Hugo Equipment Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 5.99 115871 Air filter for pole saw
Lano Equipment 101-431 101-431-4221-000 210.56 115877 BPA - Rod
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-431 101-431-4221-000 123.98 115880 Right dirt shoe/clamp #252
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-431 101-431-4221-000 11.31 115880 Hub cap #252
Midway Ford Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 150.31 115891 Mud flaps #512
Midway Ford Company 101-431 101-431-4221-000 22.26 115891 Part #600
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 33.22 115899 Fuel Filter #413
Silver Star Industries 101-431 101-431-4221-000 271.95 115907 Seat covers for truck #512
Silver Star Industries 101-431 101-431-4221-000 98.96 115907 Floor mats for truck #512
Bluetarp Financial Inc. 101-431 101-431-4240-000 864.97 115832 Diesel Transfer Pump Milwaukee Batteries
Advanced Graphix Inc. 101-431 101-431-4300-000 600.00 115822 Removal charges #393 394 396 617
Ziegler Inc. 101-431 101-431-5000-000 4,680.00 115920 Compact Track Loader Trade-in
101-431 Total 24,571.81
Dalco Inc. 101-432 101-432-4200-000 1,472.40 115846 Toilet tissue face tissue garbage can liners
Image Printing & Graphics Inc 101-432 101-432-4200-000 31.50 115872 Business Cards - R. DeGardner
Winnick Supply Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-503 33.00 115916
Nardini Fire Equipment Co 101-432 101-432-4300-000 91.52 115896 Fire extinguisher inspection
Nardini Fire Equipment Co 101-432 101-432-4300-000 1,148.45 115896 Fire extinguisher inspection and recharge
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-500 75.00 115827 Site 115 Jan 2022 CAC FIber
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-500 75.00 115827 Site 115 Feb 2022 CAC FIber
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-501 75.00 115827 Site 116 Feb 2022 CAC FIber
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-501 75.00 115827 Site 116 Jan 2022 CAC FIber
Aid Electric Corporation 101-432 101-432-4300-503 215.78 115824 Repair lights in PD
Aid Electric Corporation 101-432 101-432-4300-503 267.00 115824 Repair lights in Burster room
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-503 75.00 115827 Site 117 Jan 2022 CAC FIber
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-503 75.00 115827 Site 117 Feb 2022 CAC FIber
TDS Metrocom MN 101-432 101-432-4321-000 200.67 115912 Phone Services
CenturyLink 101-432 101-432-4321-503 60.22 115839 Phone & Internet Services
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-501 575.21 115919 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-502 1,335.15 115919 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-503 5,791.50 115919 Electric
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-432 101-432-4384-500 248.47 115915 Trash & Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-432 101-432-4384-501 34.51 115915 Trash & Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-432 101-432-4384-502 99.40 115915 Trash & Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-432 101-432-4384-503 343.12 115915 Trash & Recycling
Marsden Bldg Maintenance LLC 101-432 101-432-4410-500 1,096.83 115882 January Janitorial Services
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-500 88.53 115890 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/MP C307 Color Copier
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-500 90.44 115890 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/MP C307 Color Copier
Premium Waters Inc. 101-432 101-432-4410-500 38.29 115900 Kandiyohi water
Huebsch Services 101-432 101-432-4410-501 264.45 115870 Mats
Marsden Bldg Maintenance LLC 101-432 101-432-4410-501 663.16 115882 January Janitorial Services
Huebsch Services 101-432 101-432-4410-502 116.14 115870 Mats
Marsden Bldg Maintenance LLC 101-432 101-432-4410-502 726.41 115882 January Janitorial Services
Huebsch Services 101-432 101-432-4410-503 496.89 115870 Mats
Marsden Bldg Maintenance LLC 101-432 101-432-4410-503 4,048.80 115882 January Janitorial Services
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-503 189.05 115890 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/IM C2500 Color Copier
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-503 475.10 115890 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/IM C6000 Color Copier
101-432 Total 20,691.99
Medica 101-450 101-450-4131-000 1,366.32 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-450 101-450-4134-000 147.19 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Frattallone's/Circle Pines Ace 101-450 101-450-4211-000 19.56 115857 Toilet bowl cleaner
Wipers & Wipes Inc. 101-450 101-450-4211-000 149.70 115917 Can Liners
T-Mobile USA Inc 101-450 101-450-4321-000 50.13 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
Xcel Energy 101-450 101-450-4381-000 190.14 115919 Electric
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-450 101-450-4384-000 0.00 115915 Trash & Recycling
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-450 101-450-5000-000 2,094.25 115918 December Tower Park Site Improvements
101-450 Total 4,017.29
Medica 101-451 101-451-4131-000 224.86 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-451 101-451-4134-000 10.11 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-451 Total 234.97
Medica 101-461 101-461-4131-000 171.22 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-461 101-461-4134-000 13.47 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
T-Mobile USA Inc 101-461 101-461-4321-000 29.00 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
101-461 Total 213.69
Medica 101-462 101-462-4131-000 114.15 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-462 101-462-4134-000 8.99 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
1st Choice Document Destruction 101-462 101-462-4410-000 600.00 115819 3800 pounds of paper & cardboard recycled
Freimuth Enterprises LLC 101-462 101-462-4410-000 375.00 115858 Nov 2021 Recycling Saturday - 28919 LBS
Freimuth Enterprises LLC 101-462 101-462-4410-000 375.00 115858 Dec 2021 Recycling Saturday - 20341 LBS
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-462 101-462-4410-000 64.90 115915 Organic Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-462 101-462-4410-000 61.36 115915 Organic Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-462 101-462-4410-000 76.70 115915 Organic Recycling
Walters Recycling & Refuse 101-462 101-462-4410-000 76.70 115915 Organic Recycling
101-462 Total 1,752.80
Medica 101-463 101-463-4131-000 142.68 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-463 101-463-4134-000 11.24 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-463 Total 153.92
Medica 202-451 202-451-4131-000 269.83 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 202-451 202-451-4134-000 29.21 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Dalco Inc. 202-451 202-451-4211-000 546.13 115846 Hand wash can liners sanitary liners
Frattallone's/Circle Pines Ace 202-451 202-451-4211-301 33.94 115857 Batteries for door alarms
Menards - Blaine 202-451 202-451-4211-301 35.41 115886 Lubricants for Rookery
Menards - Forest Lake 202-451 202-451-4211-301 142.89 115887 Hole saw drillbit adhesice
BDS Laundry Systems 202-451 202-451-4240-301 15,256.00 115831 Washer and Dryer for Rookery
Recreation Supply Co. Inc 202-451 202-451-4240-301 6,835.38 115902 Racing lane line lane reel clock
Recreation Supply Co. Inc 202-451 202-451-4240-301 242.25 115902 U.S.C.G Ring Buoy
All State Communications Inc 202-451 202-451-4300-301 2,853.00 115825 Fiber installation
Cornerstone Utility Construction Inc 202-451 202-451-4300-301 45,650.00 115845 Fiber Extension
DSGW 202-451 202-451-4300-301 1,605.00 115848 RAC Renovation Consultation Services
Edina Painting Company 202-451 202-451-4300-301 29,100.00 115850 Paint gym activity center kids area
Edina Painting Company 202-451 202-451-4300-301 17,850.00 115850 Paint office area common areas
Hauglies Inc. 202-451 202-451-4300-301 37,968.60 115866 Removed and replaced carpet - Fitness area
L J Level Construction Inc 202-451 202-451-4300-301 8,613.50 115875 Birthday Party Room - Charge Order #1
WSB & Associates Inc. 202-451 202-451-4300-301 6,126.50 115918 December Rookery Activity Center
SHI International Corp 202-451 202-451-4310-301 1,072.00 115905 Microsoft Office Licenses - Rookery Staff
CenturyLink 202-451 202-451-4321-000 63.57 115839 Phone & Internet Services
Finance & Commerce Inc. 202-451 202-451-4340-000 243.78 115855 Rookery Improvement Project Bids/Construction
Xcel Energy 202-451 202-451-4381-000 3,751.74 115919 Electric
Walters Recycling & Refuse 202-451 202-451-4384-000 129.42 115915 Trash & Recycling
Endurance Fitness of MN LLC 202-451 202-451-4410-000 12,500.00 115852 February 2022 EF Monthly Fee
Huebsch Services 202-451 202-451-4410-000 398.04 115870 Mats
202-451 Total 191,316.19
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 332-470 332-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
332-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 335-470 335-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
335-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 336-470 336-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
336-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 337-470 337-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
337-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 338-470 338-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
338-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 339-470 339-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
339-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 341-470 341-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
341-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 343-470 343-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
343-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 344-470 344-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
344-470 Total 200.00
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 345-470 345-470-4300-000 200.00 115830 2021 Continuing Disclosure Services
345-470 Total 200.00
Emergency Automotive Technologies 402-421 402-421-5000-000 9,671.12 115851 Build-out #623
402-421 Total 9,671.12
City of Roseville 403-407 403-407-4240-000 891.00 115841 NetMotion Licenses - Christofferson Thoma Eller
City of Roseville 403-407 403-407-4240-000 964.68 115841 Laserfiche License - J. Eller
403-407 Total 1,855.68
SHI International Corp 403-422 403-422-4240-000 268.00 115905 Microsoft Office License - Building Inspector
403-422 Total 268.00
City of Roseville 403-450 403-450-4240-000 297.00 115841 NetMotion Licenses - Schmidt
403-450 Total 297.00
WSB & Associates Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-143 5,067.25 115918 December Watermark Park
WSB & Associates Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-144 9,474.50 115918 December Woods of Baldwin Lake Final Design
405-499 Total 14,541.75
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 406-499 406-499-4301-000 620.00 115903 November Legal - DNR Water Appropriation Permit Contested
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 406-499 406-499-4301-000 280.00 115903 December Legal - DNR Water Appropriation Permit Contested
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-000 1,279.00 115918 December Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-127 846.00 115918 December Water Tower No. 3
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-136 164.00 115918 December Birch Street Watermain Improvements
Press Publications Inc. 406-499 406-499-4340-000 193.50 115901 AFB Water Tower
406-499 Total 3,382.50
Kennedy & Graven Chartered 417-499 417-499-4301-000 112.75 115874 TIF Special Legislation Review
417-499 Total 112.75
Kennedy & Graven Chartered 418-499 418-499-4301-000 112.75 115874 TIF Special Legislation Review
418-499 Total 112.75
A.X. Lino Lakes L.P. 419-531 419-531-4404-000 102,095.00 115820 TIF Pay-As-You-Go 2nd Half Settlement 2021
419-531 Total 102,095.00
WSB & Associates Inc. 420-499 420-499-4304-141 1,880.00 115918 December Market Place Dr Realignment
420-499 Total 1,880.00
WSB & Associates Inc. 421-499 421-499-4304-137 8,164.75 115918 December 2021 Street Improvements Project
WSB & Associates Inc. 421-499 421-499-4304-142 8,147.50 115918 December 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project
Finance & Commerce Inc. 421-499 421-499-4340-142 246.20 115855 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project Bids/Construction
Press Publications Inc. 421-499 421-499-4340-142 258.00 115901 AFB Street Rehab
421-499 Total 16,816.45
League of Minnesota Cities 422-499 422-499-4300-000 1,000.00 115878 MN Cities Stormwater Coalition Contributions
Springbrook Holding Company LLC 422-499 422-499-4300-000 1,924.25 115909 Import New Storm Water Utility Accounts
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 422-499 422-499-4301-125 32.00 115903 November Legal - NE Drainage Area Phase 1
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 422-499 422-499-4301-125 64.00 115903 October Legal - NE Drainage Area Phase 1
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 422-499 422-499-4301-125 224.00 115903 December Legal - NE Drainage Area Phase 1
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 242.00 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 533.75 115918 December East Region NE Drainage Area Wetland Delineation
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 2,330.00 115918 December East Region Plan - NE Drainage Area
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 2,906.00 115918 December Stormwater Ordinance Update
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 740.50 115918 December Winters Wetland Bank
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-145 1,178.00 115918 December 2022 I35E Pipe Crossing Project
422-499 Total 11,174.50
WSB & Associates Inc. 424-499 424-499-4304-000 2,535.75 115918 December Surface Water Maintenance Project
424-499 Total 2,535.75
MOSENG DEAN 601-000 601-000-2020-000 2.43 115894 Refund Check 011573-000 6315 W SHADOW LAKE DR
MOSENG DEAN 601-000 601-000-2020-000 47.80 115894 Refund Check 011573-000 6315 W SHADOW LAKE DR
MOSENG DEAN 601-000 601-000-2020-000 10.00 115894 Refund Check 011573-000 6315 W SHADOW LAKE DR
City of Blaine 601-000 601-000-2140-000 70.47 115840 1st Quarter 2022 Utilities
McGough Construction Co. LLC 601-000 601-000-3714-000 -175.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Return - Meter #60597242
McGough Construction Co. LLC 601-000 601-000-3714-000 -150.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Refund - Meter #70257939
McGough Construction Co. LLC 601-000 601-000-3855-000 -180.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Return - Meter #60597242
McGough Construction Co. LLC 601-000 601-000-3855-000 -135.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Refund - Meter #70257939
601-000 Total -509.30
Medica 601-494 601-494-4131-000 1,494.23 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 601-494 601-494-4134-000 115.73 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
Menards - Blaine 601-494 601-494-4211-000 37.41 115886 Thermometer entry mat
Menards - Forest Lake 601-494 601-494-4211-000 56.50 115887 Pipe and wrench ring set
Core & Main LP 601-494 601-494-4215-000 602.00 115844 Meters
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4222-000 5,457.37 115867 Chlorine and LPC-5
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4222-000 85.00 115867 Chlorine Cylinders
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 601-494 601-494-4300-000 1,240.00 115903 October Legal - DNR Water Appropriation Permit Contested
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4300-000 5,818.00 115918 December Risk Assessment and Emergency Response Plan
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 907.50 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 8,994.50 115918 December Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 1,110.00 115918 December General Engineering Services
City of Roseville 601-494 601-494-4310-000 1,781.52 115841 February IT Services
Comcast 601-494 601-494-4321-000 115.75 115843 Telephone Services
TDS Metrocom MN 601-494 601-494-4321-000 39.12 115912 Phone Services
T-Mobile USA Inc 601-494 601-494-4321-000 83.06 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
Xcel Energy 601-494 601-494-4381-000 6,856.09 115919 Electric
Centennial Utilities 601-494 601-494-4382-000 469.95 115838 1st Quarter 2022 Utilities
City of Blaine 601-494 601-494-4382-000 768.07 115840 1st Quarter 2022 Utilities
Gopher State One-Call 601-494 601-494-4410-000 25.00 115861 2022 Annual Facility Operator Fee
Aspen Equipment Company 601-494 601-494-5000-000 4,054.50 115828 Plow installation #512
Boyer Trucks Inc. 601-494 601-494-5000-000 28,808.69 115818 2022 Ford F250 #512
Grainger 601-494 601-494-5000-000 305.71 115863 Toolbox for new utilities truck #512
601-494 Total 69,225.70
MOSENG DEAN 602-000 602-000-2020-000 55.70 115894 Refund Check 011573-000 6315 W SHADOW LAKE DR
MOSENG DEAN 602-000 602-000-2020-000 17.12 115894 Refund Check 011573-000 6315 W SHADOW LAKE DR
602-000 Total 72.82
Medica 602-495 602-495-4131-000 1,494.22 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 602-495 602-495-4134-000 115.73 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
WSB & Associates Inc. 602-495 602-495-4304-000 602.00 115918 December East Shadow Lake Drive I&I Project
WSB & Associates Inc. 602-495 602-495-4304-000 60.50 115918 December GPS/GIS Assistances
WSB & Associates Inc. 602-495 602-495-4304-000 1,110.00 115918 December General Engineering Services
City of Roseville 602-495 602-495-4310-000 1,781.52 115841 February IT Services
T-Mobile USA Inc 602-495 602-495-4321-000 83.07 115913 Cell Phone/Wi-Fi Service
Xcel Energy 602-495 602-495-4381-000 2,335.81 115919 Electric
Centennial Utilities 602-495 602-495-4382-000 207.48 115838 1st Quarter 2022 Utilities
City of Blaine 602-495 602-495-4382-000 1,860.00 115840 1st Quarter 2022 Utilities
Gopher State One-Call 602-495 602-495-4410-000 25.00 115861 2022 Annual Facility Operator Fee
Aspen Equipment Company 602-495 602-495-5000-000 4,054.50 115828 Plow installation #512
Boyer Trucks Inc. 602-495 602-495-5000-000 28,808.69 115818 2022 Ford F250 #512
Grainger 602-495 602-495-5000-000 305.71 115863 Toolbox for new utilities truck #512
602-495 Total 42,844.23
Medica 603-496 603-496-4131-000 142.68 115885 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 603-496 603-496-4134-000 13.49 115847 Dental Insurance Premiums
City of Roseville 603-496 603-496-4310-000 712.61 115841 February IT Services
603-496 Total 868.78
Press Publications Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 37.63 115901 Rehbein Public Hearing Notice
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 990.00 115903 December Legal - Lake Amelia Woods MTO Properties Garden Apts
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 630.00 115903 November Legal - Belland Farms
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 959.00 115918 December Associated Eye Care Partners
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 1,959.00 115918 December Belland Farms
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 1,925.00 115918 December NorthPointe Gardens Estates
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 366.00 115918 December Lake Amelia Woods
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 797.00 115918 December Precision Tune
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 970.50 115918 December MTO Properties - Thrivent Financial
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 2,260.50 115918 December Robinson Concept Plan
McGough Construction Co. LLC 801-000 801-000-2301-000 100.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Return - Meter #60597242
McGough Construction Co. LLC 801-000 801-000-2301-000 600.00 115884 Water Meter Rental Refund - Meter #70257939
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2327-102 18,371.50 115918 December Watermark 4th Addition
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 801-000 801-000-2327-103 67.50 115903 December Legal - Watermark 4th Addition
Rupp Anderson Squires & Waldspurger P.A. 801-000 801-000-2327-103 450.00 115903 November Legal - Watermark 4th Addition
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2338-102 371.00 115918 December Nadeau Acres
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2344-103 164.00 115918 December Lino Lakes Storage Admin
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2359-102 138.00 115918 December Saddle Club 4th Addition
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2363-102 1,176.00 115918 December Lyngblomsten Senior Housing
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2388-102 276.00 115918 December Watermark 2nd Addition
801-000 Total 32,608.63
Landbridge Ecological 810-499 810-499-4410-000 8,414.00 115876 Foxborough 2021 Mgmt
810-499 Total 8,414.00
Grand Total 962,072.38
Electronic Funds Transfer
MN Statute 471.38 Subd. 3
Council Meeting February 14, 2022 Transfer In/(Out)
1/19/2022 Transfer from Money Market 500,000.00
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 (145,774.90)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 Federal Deposit (43,977.67)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 PERA (47,139.59)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 State (10,212.19)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 Child Support (284.77)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 H.S.A. Bank Pretax (4,084.05)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 TASC Pretax (744.17)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 ICMA 457 Def. Comp #301596 (4,470.00)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 ICMA Roth IRA #706155 (905.75)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS HCSP #98946-01 (1,792.12)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS Def. Comp #98945-01 (3,878.00)
1/21/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS Roth IRA #98945-01 (765.00)
1/28/2022 2021 PD Holiday Pay (79,070.05)
1/28/2022 2021 PD Holiday Pay Federal Deposit (18,733.61)
1/28/2022 2021 PD Holiday Pay PERA (34,174.92)
1/28/2022 2021 PD Holiday Pay State (6,053.25)
1/24/2022 Anoka County Tax Settlement - Final 155,222.37
2/1/2022 HSA Bank ER Contribution (5,791.52)
HSA Bank ER Contribution (Eller) (83.33)
2/4/2022 Council #02 Payroll (3,636.37)
2/4/2022 Council #02 Federal Deposit (206.94)
2/4/2022 Council #02 PERA (403.16)
2/4/2022 Council #02 State (45.08)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 (143,020.66)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 Federal Deposit (44,457.59)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 PERA (47,080.51)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 State (10,318.44)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 Child Support (284.77)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 H.S.A. Bank Pretax (4,084.05)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 TASC Pretax (744.17)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 ICMA 457 Def. Comp #301596 (4,470.00)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 ICMA Roth IRA #706155 (905.75)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS HCSP #98946-01 (1,813.52)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS Def. Comp #98945-01 (3,878.00)
2/4/2022 Payroll #02 MSRS Roth IRA #98945-01 (765.00)
2/15/2022 Building Permit Surcharge (4,473.12)
2/18/2022 Sales & Use Tax (1,527.00)
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : January 24, 2022 4
TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 6:25 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, 7
Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Human Resources and 10
Communications Coordinator Meg Sawyer; Community Development Director Michael 11
Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Public Safety Director 12
John Swenson; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Clerk Julie Bartell 13
14
1. Preliminary Design for the Hodgson/CR J Improvements – Community 15
Development Director Grochala introduced representatives from Anoka County and WSB 16
and Associates who are working on the project. Anoka County staff reviewed a 17
PowerPoint presentation that included information on the following: 18
19
- Challenges – traffic operations, closeness of adjacent properties, skew of existing 20
intersection, right of way impact; 21
- Options – roundabout, signal; 22
- Overall Layouts – each option; 23
- Traffic Comparisons – looking ahead as well; 24
- Alternative Comparisons (charted); more benefits at this point for the roundabout; 25
- Next steps – sharing with jurisdictions and public (including website comments 26
and live open house); 27
- 2023 Construction is envisioned. 28
29
Mayor Rafferty remarked that the open house held for Birch Street improvements was 30
well received and well handled. 31
32
Councilmember Cavegn remarked that there is more space available to the east and he 33
wonders why that isn’t being utilized. County staff explained that they weighed options 34
and are initially presenting a plan they feel is fair and works well with properties. Staff 35
then clarified that they are in the process of setting up meetings with the property owners. 36
37
Councilmember Stoesz noted north to south direction and that in the SE quadrant it seems 38
impossible to get into the gas station without a roundabout. Staff explained how access 39
could be provided. Councilmember Stoesz asked about barriers to prevent certain 40
movements around the intersection; staff has not looked at that possibility at this point. 41
Pedestrian access (with roundabout) would be handled with ramps, similar to what was 42
done on Birch Street. Is fixing the trail part of the project? Staff said they are working 43
on getting that done. 44
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
2
45
Councilmember Lyden echoed that the process and product for Birch Street was well 46
done. One improvement would be adding pedestrian crossing signals. He sees that staff 47
prefers a roundabout and also has a schedule to follow. He wonders if the necessary 48
conversations with property owners has begun; staff indicated some discussion is 49
underway. 50
51
Mayor Rafferty asked about costs involved with a signal. Staff said, in general, the 52
signal represents added costs. The mayor said he will be very interested to hear what the 53
area property owners have to say. 54
55
2. Redistricting and Voting Precincts – City Clerk Bartell reviewed a PowerPoint 56
presentation that included information on the following 57
- Overview of redistricting process; 58
- Possible impact on City voting districts; 59
- Timeline for consideration. 60
61
City Clerk Bartell then reviewed the City’s current voting precinct map and discussed 62
possible changes. 63
64
Information on city precincts, including a map with a change proposed to Precinct 5, was 65
reviewed. The council directed staff to prepare for the change to Precinct 5 while 66
awaiting redistricting information. 67
68
3. Review Regular Agenda 69
70
The agenda was reviewed and there were no changes. 71
72
The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 73
74
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 75
February 14, 2022. 76
77
78
79
80
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 81
82
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
1
1
LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL 2
REGULAR MEETING 3
MINUTES 4
5
DATE : January 24, 2022 6
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 7
TIME ENDED : 7:00 p.m. 8
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, 9
Ruhland, Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 10
MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Lyden 11
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Human Resources and Communications 12
Manager Meg Sawyer; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie 13
Larsen; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; Public Services 14
Director Rick DeGardner; City Clerk Julie Bartell 15
16
PUBLIC COMMENT 17
There were no public comments. 18
SETTING THE AGENDA 19
The agenda was approved as presented. 20
SPECIAL PRESENTATION 21
Presentation of plaque to Richard Jensen for 14 years of service on the Park Board. 22
CONSENT AGENDA 23
Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1D as presented. 24
Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 25
26
ITEM ACTION 27
Consideration of Expenditures: 28
A) January 24, 2022 (Check No. 115718 through 115812) 29
in the Amount of $619,666.06 Approved 30
B) Consider Approval of January 3, 2022 Council 31
Work Session Minutes Approved 32
C) Consider Approval of January 10, 2022 Council 33
Minutes Approved 34
D) Consider Approval of January 10, 2022 Council 35
Work Session Minutes Approved 36
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 37
There was no report from the Finance Department. 38
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
2
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 39
3A) Consider Appointment of Fire Lieutenant/Fire Inspector – Human Resources and 40
Communications Manager Sawyer reviewed her written report that included information on the 41
qualifications and background of candidate Brian Finke. Staff is recommending the appointment of 42
Mr. Finke. 43
Councilmember Ruhland noted that he met Mr. Finke and found him very knowledgeable; he feels 44
this position will be a great fit. 45
Councilmember Stoesz confirmed that the position’s education requirement is met with an 46
Associates Degree (along with Mr. Finke’s current studies). 47
Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve the appointment of Brian Finke as recommended. 48
Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 49
3B) Consider Approval of Employee Fitness Membership Policy– Human Resources and 50
Communications Manager Sawyer reported that staff has prepared a policy based on research and 51
other considerations; the policy was reviewed by The Rec Center Advisory Committee. 52
Councilmember Ruhland asked if there is a requirement for miminum attendance, as is the case with 53
healthcare reimbursement. 54
Administrator Cotton explained that since employees wouldn’t have any cost, they would not qualify 55
for any health care reimbursement. 56
Councilmember Cavegn asked if there would be a discount for family membership as well. Ms. 57
Sawyer said the cost of a single membership would be deducted from the family (or dual) membership 58
cost. 59
Resident Richard Jenson asked if there will be a senior rate? Ms. Cotton said there will be a senior 60
rate as well as a Silver Sneakers options (through health care). 61
Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve the Employee Fitness Policy as presented. 62
Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 63
3C) Consider Appointment of Police Officer – Human Resources and Communications Manager 64
Sawyer reviewed her written report that included information on applicant Kevin Tracy’s education, 65
training and qualifications. Staff is recommending appointment of Mr. Tracy. 66
Public Safety Director Swenson clarified sworn strength for the department after this hire. He also 67
noted that the start date may have to be pushed forward slightly depending on circumstances. 68
Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve the appointment of Kevin Tracy as recommended. 69
Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 70
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 71
There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 72
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 73
5A) Consider Resolution No. 22-15, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Contract for Rookery 74
Flooring and Tiling Improvements – Public Services Director DeGardner reviewed his written 75
report. He reviewed the scope of the project and noted that bids for the work were received recently. 76
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
3
The low bid is recommended and work is proposed to be funded through American Rescue Plan Act 77
(ARPA) dollars. 78
Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 22-15 as presented. Councilmember 79
Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 80
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 81
6A) Natures Refuge: i. Consider Resolution No. 22-13 approving PUD Final Plan/Final 82
Plan; ii. Consider Resolution No. 22-14 approving Development Agreement – City Planner Larsen 83
reviewed a PowerPoint presentation that included information on the following: 84
- 61 lot subdivision, 94 acre parcel (shown on map); 85
- Previous preliminary approvals; 86
- Revision to final plat is minor lot line requirement only; 87
- Original plat (shown); 88
- Approvals requested. 89
At the council’s request, staff reviewed the trails planned within the development. The council and 90
staff also discussed roadway connections for the future (some are stubbed). The park dedication 91
revenue from the development will provide for new trails. 92
Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 22-13 and Resolution No. 22-14 as 93
presented. Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 94
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 95
There was no Unfinished Business. 96
97
NEW BUSINESS 98
There was no New Business. 99
100
COMMUNITY EVENTS 101
There were no events announced. 102
COMMUNITY CALENDAR 103
104
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 105
January 24, 2022 through February 14, 2022 106
Wednesday, January 26 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board 107
Wednesday, February 2 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Park Board 108
Thursday, February 3 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 109
Monday, February 7 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 110
Monday, February 14 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 111
Monday, February 14 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 112
113
ADJOURN 114
115
There being no further business, Councilmember Ruhland moved to adjourn at 7:00 p.m. 116
Councilmember Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 117
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
4
The Economic Development Authority (EDA) meeting followed the regular city council meeting. 118
(see separate minutes) 119
120
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on February 14, 2022. 121
122
123
124
125
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 126
127
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 22-22, Electing the Standard Allowance
Available under the Revenue Loss Provision of the American
Rescue Plan Act
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City has been allocated $2,417,213.82 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. The
funds have been accepted and are planned to be used in a manner consistent with guidance
adopted by the United States Department of Treasury.
In May 2021, the Treasury published the Interim Final Rule describing eligible and ineligible
uses of funds as well as other program provisions. Under that guidance the City adopted a
spending plan on December 13, 2021.
On January 6, 2022, Treasury issued the Final Rule delivering broader flexibility and greater
simplicity in the program. The Final Rule offers a standard allowance for revenue loss of up to
$10 million, allowing recipients to select between a standard amount of revenue loss or
complete a full revenue loss calculation. Recipients that elect the standard allowance may use
that amount, in many cases their full award, for government services, with streamlined
reporting requirements.
By electing the standard allowance available under the revenue loss provision of ARPA in the
amount of $2,417,213.82, the City may spend all allocated ARPA funds for the provision of
government services.
Similar to the initial spending plan, the City intends to use the revenue loss funds for the
provision of government services to re-open the Rookery Activity Center and, if needed, other
pay-go spending for capital improvements and purchases.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 22-22, Electing the Standard Allowance
Available under the Revenue Loss Provision of the American Rescue Plan Act.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 22-22
League of Minnesota Cities
American Rescue Plan Act Resolution Page 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-22
RESOLUTION ELECTING THE STANDARD ALLOWANCE
AVAILABLE UNDER THE REVENUE LOSS PROVISION OF THE
CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND
ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
WHEREAS, Congress adopted the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021 (“ARPA”) which
included $65 billion in recovery funds for cities across the country.
WHEREAS, ARPA funds are intended to provide support to state, local, and tribal governments
in responding to the impact of COVID-19 and in their efforts to contain COVID-19 in their
communities, residents, and businesses.
WHEREAS, The Fiscal Recovery Funds provides for $19.53 billion in payments to be made to
States and territories which will distribute the funds to nonentitlement units of local government
(NEUs).
WHEREAS, The ARPA requires that States and territories allocate funding to NEUs in an
amount that bears the same proportion as the population of the NEU bears to the total population
of all NEUs in the State or territory.
WHEREAS, $2,417,213.82 has been allocated to the City of Lino Lakes (“City”) pursuant to the
ARPA.
WHEREAS, The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ensures that governments
have the resources needed to fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling
with its public health and economic impacts, maintain vital public services, even amid declines
in revenue, and build a strong, resilient, and equitable recovery by making investments that
support long-term growth and opportunity.
WHEREAS, In May 2021, the US Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) published the Interim
Final Rule describing eligible and ineligible uses of funds as well as other program provisions,
sought feedback from the public on these program rules, and began to distribute funds.
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2022, Treasury issued the final rule. The final rule delivers broader
flexibility and greater simplicity in the program, responsive to feedback in the comment process.
WHEREAS, the final rule offers a standard allowance for revenue loss of up to $10 million,
allowing recipients to select between a standard amount of revenue loss or complete a full
revenue loss calculation.
WHEREAS, recipients that select the standard allowance may use that amount, in many cases
their full award, for government services, with streamlined reporting requirements.
League of Minnesota Cities
American Rescue Plan Act Resolution Page 2
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the
City elects the standard allowance available under the revenue loss provision of the American
Rescue Plan Act in the amount of $2,417,213.82 to be used for the general provision of
government services.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember
_______________and was duly seconded by Councilmember ________________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Adopting Capital Asset Policy
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City has previously followed an informal Capital Asset Policy. A Capital Asset Policy
does not affect the budgeting or purchasing of capital assets, it is strictly used for financial
reporting purposes.
The attached Capital Asset Policy provides guidance to meet financial reporting requirements.
When preparing for the annual audit, staff is guided by the policy in regards to what is
considered a capital asset, the cost that should be assigned to it, and the useful life in which the
asset is depreciated.
Previously, the City used a $2,500 capitalization threshold for all asset classes. The Capital
Asset Policy assigns a capitalization threshold to each asset class. This practice is widely used
by other local government units.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adopting the Capital Asset Policy.
ATTACHMENTS
Capital Asset Policy
CAPITAL ASSET POLICY
January 1, 2021
INTRODUCTION
The City of Lino Lakes was required to implement Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003. Statement No. 34 established new financial reporting requirements
for state and local governments throughout the United States. Statement No. 34 created
new information and restructured much of the information that the City of Lino Lakes
had presented in its annual reports prior to implementation. The intent of those new
requirements was to make annual reports more comprehensive and easier to
understand and use.
Two key components of Statement No. 34 required governments to report capital assets
and the capital assets depreciation over their estimated useful lives. Though the City
has informally followed a policy since the introduction of the new standards, it is
necessary for the City to formally develop and implement a Capital Asset Policy that
meets the financial statement reporting requirements.
While the Capital Asset Policy is not all encompassing, it will provide guidance for the
City to meet the reporting requirements, i.e., meeting the primary objective of financial
reporting as it pertains to valuation, allocation, presentation and disclosure; therefore,
this policy will not be used for property control purposes.
This policy was approved 2/14/2022 and is effective retroactively to 1/1/2021.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose 1
Section I Define Capital Assets and Capitalization Thresholds 1
Section II Reporting Capital Assets 1
Section III Major Asset Classes 2
Section IV Depreciating Capital Assets 6
Section V Capital Assets Estimated Useful Life 7
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
CAPITAL ASSET POLICY
Purpose
It is the policy of the City of Lino Lakes to maintain appropriate procedures regarding the
procurement, management, and disposal of all capital assets in accordance with
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 (GASB 34). This Capital Assets
Policy establishes criteria for reporting capital assets within the City’s financial statements in
order to provide users with consistent and comparable information for the current and all future
fiscal periods.
Section I: Define Capital Assets and Capitalization Thresholds
Capital assets are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns
in the City’s government-wide financial statements.
A capital asset is real or personal property used in operations which has an individual value
equal to or greater than the capitalization threshold set forth by the City, for that specific asset
classification, and has an estimated useful life greater than one year. For financial reporting
purposes only, the City will classify and establish capitalization thresholds for each asset class
as follows:
Land $10,000
Buildings and building improvements $50,000
Improvements other than buildings (land improvements) $25,000
Machinery and equipment $10,000
Infrastructure and other improvements $100,000
Other assets $10,000
Construction in progress ***
***Accumulate all costs and capitalize if over the capitalization threshold for the applicable asset class.
Section II: Reporting Capital Assets
Capital assets are reported at their historical cost. The historical cost of a capital asset should
include the cost of the asset itself and the following:
Ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended location (e.g., freight
charges)
Ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended condition for use (e.g.,
installation and site preparation charges)
A cost should only be capitalized if it is (1) directly identifiable with a specific asset and (2) only
if it is incurred after the acquisition of the related asset has come to be considered probable
(i.e., “likely to occur”). For example, a study to determine the best location for a building or a
2
feasibly study would not be capitalized while legal costs to acquire property would be
capitalized.
The historical cost of a capital asset should include the cost of any subsequent additions or
improvements but exclude the cost of repairs and maintenance. An addition or improvement,
unlike a repair, either enhances a capital asset’s functionality (effectiveness or efficiency), or it
extends a capital asset’s expected useful life. For example, mill and overlays or periodically
resurfacing a new road would be treated as a repair (the cost would not be capitalized), while
reconstructing a road or adding a new lane constitutes an addition (a cost that would be
capitalized).
In the event the historical cost of a capital asset is not practically determinable, it will be
necessary to record an estimated historical cost of the asset using alternative methods.
Alternative methods include standard costing and normal costing. Standard costing estimates
the historical cost of a capital asset by establishing the average cost of obtaining the same or a
similar asset at the time of acquisition. Normal costing estimates historical cost based on the
current cost to either reproduce or replace the capital asset, indexed by a reciprocal factor
from the estimated acquisition date, i.e., taking the value of acquiring the asset new today and
then discounting that amount by an appropriate inflation factor back to the date of acquisition.
Assets that the City purchases at a nominal amount or are given by another party are to be
recorded as donations rather than using the actual nominal cost to the City. Donated capital
assets should be reported at their estimated fair value at the time of acquisition plus ancillary
charges, if any. Fair value is the amount at which an asset could be exchanged in a current
transfer at arm’s length between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. For
assets that do not have easily obtainable fair market values, the City should use the amount it
would cost them to purchase or contract the asset in question. Donations are defined as
voluntary contributions of resources to the City by a non-governmental entity. A voluntary
contribution of resources between governmental entities is not a donation.
Section III: Major Asset Classes
Governments commonly report seven or more major classes of capital assets:
1. Land
Land is generally characterized by an indefinite useful life; therefore, it is not depreciated.
The cost of land should not only include its acquisition price, but also the cost of initially
preparing the land for its intended use (excavation, fill, grading). Land frequently is closely
associated with some other assets (e.g., land under a building or road). No matter how
close this relationship may be, land should always be treated separately. Examples of
items to be capitalized as land and land improvements include:
Purchase price or fair value at time of gift
Commissions
3
Professional fees, including title searches, architect, legal, engineering, appraisal,
surveying, environmental assessments, etc.
Land excavation, fill, grading, and drainage
Demolition of existing buildings and improvements (less salvage value)
Removal, relocation, or reconstruction of property owned by others such as power,
telephone, and railroad lines
Interest on mortgages accrued at the date of purchase
Accrued and unpaid taxes at the date of purchase
Other costs incurred in acquiring the land
Water wells, including initial cost for drilling, the pump, and its casing
Permanent right-of-way
2. Buildings and Building Improvements
Buildings. All permanent structures that are attached to land, have a roof, are partially or
completely enclosed by walls, and are not intended to be transportable or moveable are
included in this asset class. The City can elect to report major components of buildings as
separate capital assets in their own right, when these components have a significantly
shorter estimated useful life than the structure to which they relate (e.g., HVAC). Examples
of items to be capitalized as buildings include:
Purchased Buildings
Original purchase price
Expenses for remodeling, reconditioning, or altering a purchased building to make it
ready for its intended purpose
Environmental compliance, i.e., asbestos abatement
Professional fees, includes architectural, engineering, management fees for design
and supervision, and legal fees
Cancellation or buyout of existing leases
Other costs required to place or render the asset into operation
Constructed Buildings
Completed project costs
Cost of excavation, grading, or filling of land for a specific building
Expenses incurred for the preparation of plans, specifications, and blueprints
Building permits
Costs of temporary buildings used during construction
Additions to buildings, i.e., expansions, extensions, or enlargements
Building Improvements. Building improvements include capitalized costs that materially
extend the useful life of a building, increase the value of a building, or both. Building
improvements should not include maintenance and repairs done in the normal course of
4
business. If practical, the costs of an improvement are normally added to the cost of the
related structure, rather than treating it as a separate asset.
Examples of items to be capitalized as building improvements include:
Installation or upgrade of heating and cooling systems, including ceiling fans and
attic fans
Original installation or upgrade of wall or ceiling covering such as carpeting, tiles,
paneling, or parquet
Structural changes such as reinforcement of floors or walls, installation or
replacement of beams, rafters, joists, steel grids, or other interior framing
Installation or upgrade of window or door-frames, upgrading windows or doors, built-
in closet and cabinets
Interior renovation of casings, baseboards, light fixtures, and ceiling trim
Installation or upgrade of plumbing and electrical wiring
Installation or upgrade of telecommunication systems
Examples of items considered repairs or maintenance in nature and should not be
capitalized as buildings or building improvements include:
Adding, removing and/or moving of walls relating to renovation projects that are not
considered major rehabilitation projects and do not increase the value of the building
Improvement projects of minimal or no added life expectancy and/or value to the
building
Plumbing or electrical repairs
Cleaning, pest extermination, or other periodic maintenance
Interior decoration, i.e., draperies, blinds, curtain roads, wallpaper
Exterior decoration, i.e., detachable awnings, uncovered porches, decorative fences
Maintenance-type interior renovation including repainting, touch-up plastering,
replacement of carpet, tile, or pane sections, and refinishing of sinks and fixtures
Replacement of a part or component of a building with a new part of the same type
and performance capabilities, e.g., replacement of an old boiler with a new one of
the same type and performance capabilities
Any other maintenance-related expenditure which does not increase the value of the
building
3. Improvements Other Than Buildings (Land Improvements)
This asset class is used for permanent (i.e., non-moveable) improvements, other than
buildings, that add value to land but do not have an indefinite useful life (i.e. fences, parking
lots, retaining walls). Moveable items should be classified as machinery and equipment.
4. Machinery and Equipment
5
This asset class includes vehicles, furnishings, and similar moveable items used for
operations for which the benefit extends beyond one year from the date of receipt.
Examples of expenditures to be capitalized as machinery and equipment include:
Original contract or invoice price
Freight charges
Handling and storage charges
In-transit insurance charges
Sales, use and other taxes imposed on the acquisition
Installation charges
Charges for testing and preparation for use
Cost of reconditioning used items
Parts and labor associated with the construction of equipment, machinery, or
vehicles
Note that the cost of extended warranties and/or maintenance agreements, which can be
separately identified from the cost of the equipment, machinery, or vehicle, shall not be
capitalized.
5. Infrastructure
Infrastructure assets are long-lived capital assets that normally are stationary in nature and
normally can be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital
assets (i.e. roads, bridges, tunnels, drainage systems, water and sewer systems, dams,
and lighting systems). As a general rule, the cost of buildings associated with infrastructure
should be reported separately as buildings rather than as part of the cost of the
infrastructure. The exception to this rule is buildings that are purely ancillary to a network or
subsystem of infrastructure (e.g., road maintenance structures such as shops and garages
associated with a highway system and water pumping stations associated with water
systems).
Examples of infrastructure assets include:
Roads, streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks
Bridges
Water and sanitary sewer systems
Drainage and storm water systems
Street light systems
Signage
6
6. Other assets
This asset class is used for assets that do not fit into one of the other major asset classes.
It also includes computer software that is either purchased or developed for internal use,
which should be capitalized if the cost of the software exceeds the capitalization threshold
and is depreciated over the software’s estimated useful life. Capitalization of computer
software includes software license fees if the total dollar amount of the fee divided by the
number of units or terminals exceeds the threshold.
Examples of expenditures to be capitalized as computer software include:
External direct costs of materials and services, i.e., third-party fees for services
Costs to obtain software from third parties
Travel costs incurred by employees in their duties directly associated with
development
Payroll and payroll-related costs of employees directly associated with or devoting
time to encoding, installing, or testing
Costs to develop or obtain software that allows for access or conversion of old data
by new information systems
Note that upgrades and enhancements should only be capitalized to the extent that they
increase the functionality of the product.
7. Construction in progress
This asset class is used for costs incurred to construct or develop an asset before it is
substantially ready to be placed into service (at which time it is reclassified into the
appropriate major asset class).
Section IV: Depreciating Capital Assets
Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of a tangible asset to the periods of benefit.
Capital assets shall be depreciated over their estimated useful live with exception of the
following:
Inexhaustible assets, i.e., land, and land improvements that do not require maintenance
or replacement, e.g., certain works of art and historical treasures
Construction work-in-progress
For financial purposes, the City will use the straight-line method of depreciation, which
allocates the cost evenly over the life of the asset. Generally, at the end of an asset’s life, the
sum of the amounts charged for depreciation in each accounting period, or accumulated
depreciation, will equal the original cost less salvage value.
7
Section V: Capital Assets Estimated Useful Life
The City’s capital assets are depreciated over the following estimated useful lives derived from
the Internal Revenue Service Alternative Depreciation System (ADS):
Land Indefinite life, not depreciated
Buildings and Building Improvements
Buildings 40 years
Temporary and portable buildings 25 years
Roof 20 years
HVAC (heating, ventilation, air conditioning) 20 years
Electrical 20 years
Plumbing 20 years
Sprinkler system 20 years
Elevators 20 years
Floor covering other than carpet 15 years
Interior construction 15 years
Security and fire alarm system 10 years
Cabling 10 years
Interior renovation 10 years
Carpeting 7 years
Other buildings and building improvements not listed above 7-40 years
Improvements Other Than Buildings (Land Improvements)
Fencing and gates 20 years
Landscaping 20 years
Outdoor sprinkler and irrigation systems 20 years
Golf courses 20 years
Swimming pools, tennis and basketball courts, skate parks 20 years
Fountains 20 years
Retaining walls 20 years
Outdoor lighting 20 years
Recreation areas and athletic fields, including bleachers 15 years
Paths and trails 15 years
Septic systems 15 years
Other improvements not listed above 15-20 years
Machinery and Equipment
Outdoor equipment (playgrounds, scoreboards) 15 years
Firefighting trucks 15 years
Athletic equipment 10 years
Telecommunications equipment 10 years
Fire department equipment 10 years
Furniture and fixtures (excluding structural components) 10 years
Grounds equipment (mowers, tractors, bobcats) 10 years
Kitchen equipment (appliances) 10 years
Lab equipment 10 years
Law enforcement equipment 10 years
Custodial equipment 10 years
Business machines and office equipment 7 years
Audio visual equipment 6 years
8
Heavy general purpose truck and equipment (weight > 13,000lbs) 6 years
Cars, light general purpose trucks (weight < 13,000lbs) 5 years
Photocopiers 5 years
Computer equipment and software (servers, network equipment,
large software packages such as document management software) 5 years
Machinery, tools, and other equipment not listed above 5 years
Infrastructure and Other Improvements
Water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer systems 50 years
Roads, streets, curb, and gutter 20 years
Sidewalks 20 years
Bridges 20 years
Parking lots, driveways, and parking barriers 15 years
Other infrastructure and improvements not listed above 15-50 years
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Approval of Settlement Agreement, St. Clair Land
Company
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve a Settlement Agreement and Release between St. Clair
Land Company and the City of Lino Lakes.
BACKGROUND
The City of Lino Lakes and St. Clair Land Company are parties to a civil action captioned St.
Clair Land Company v. City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Court File No. 02-CV-20-4137,
relating to St. Clair’s breach of contract claims against the City. A court trial was held on
October 4 and 5, 2021, and the Court issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order
for Judgment on February 3, 2022. The Parties wish to resolve all Claims between them in the
Full and Final Settlement Agreement and Release (attached).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the Settlement Agreement and Release.
ATTACHMENTS
Final Settlement Agreement and Release
1
FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
This Full and Final Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”) is entered
into by and between St. Clair Land Company (“St. Clair”) and the City of Lino Lakes
(“City”) (each is a “Party,” and collectively they are the “Parties”).
The Parties are parties to a civil action captioned St. Clair Land Company v. City of
Lino Lakes, Anoka County Court File No. 02-CV-20-4137 (the “Action”), relating to St.
Clair’s breach of contract claims against the City. A court trial was held on October 4 and
5, 2021, and the Court issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for
Judgment on February 3, 2022. The Parties wish to resolve all Claims (defined below)
between them in this Agreement.
For and in consideration of the mutual releases, covenants, and undertakings in
this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, which each Party
acknowledges, the Parties incorporate the above Recitals and agree as follows:
1. Settlement Terms. The City and St. Clair agree to the following settlement
terms:
a. St. Clair will dismiss its claim related to the Driveway Repair at 6575
Enid Trail. The amount of this claim is $2,645.00
b. St. Clair will waive its appeal rights to any and all claims assert in this
Action.
c. The City will not petition the Court for its attorney’s fees and costs as
allowed by Paragraph 17(e) of the Development Agreement and the
Court’s February 3, 2022 Order for Judgment.
d. Both parties waive their right to pursue any statutorily available fees or
costs.
2. Mutual Release of Claims.
(a) Mutual Release. In consideration of the promises contained herein, the City
and St. Clair, for themselves, their successors, assigns, owners, agents, officers, directors
and anyone else acting on their behalf, release, waive, surrender, and forever discharge
one another and their successors, assigns, owners, agents, officers and directors from all
claims, actions, causes of action, suits, debts, damages, liabilities, claims for attorneys’
fees, costs, expenses, counterclaims, cross-claims, injunctive relief, declaratory relief,
claims for contribution, claims for indemnity, claims for subrogation, claims on surety or
other bonds, judgments, and demands, in law or equity, of whatever kind or nature,
whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent, apparent or
concealed (collectively, “Claims”), which were asserted or could have been asserted in
the Action.
Full and Final Settlement Agreement: St. Clair Land Company v. City of Lino Lakes
Page 2 of 3
3. Dismissal of Action with Prejudice. Upon execution of this Agreement, the
Parties will execute and file a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and Order,
dismissing the Action with prejudice, on the merits, and without fees or costs to any
Party.
4. Non-Admission. The Parties agree nothing in this Agreement is an
admission by any Party of any wrongdoing or violation of any law, and nothing in this
Agreement shall be so construed by anyone. Each Party denies liability on every Claim
that was or could have been asserted by any other Party.
5. Costs and Fees. Each Party shall bear its own respective costs and
attorneys’ fees.
6. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the Parties and their respective agents, servants, employees, officers,
directors, principals, affiliated entities, shareholders, successors, insurers and assigns.
7. Entire Agreement and Severability. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement regarding the subject matter of the Agreement and was jointly drafted by the
Parties. Any ambiguity in this Agreement shall not be construed against any one of the
Parties. Any modification or addition to this Agreement must be in writing and signed
by each Party. If any part of this Agreement is invalid or cannot be enforced, such part
will be deleted or modified so it is enforceable, and the other parts of this Agreement will
remain in effect.
8. Choice of Law. The parties agree this Agreement is governed by the laws
of the State of Minnesota without regard to conflicts of law principles, and any dispute
about any aspect of this Agreement or its terms may be decided only in a court of
competent jurisdiction in Minnesota.
9. Parties Represented by Counsel. Each Party was represented by counsel
through the negotiations leading to the resolution embodied in this Agreement. Each
Party has signed this Agreement as a free and voluntary act.
10. Execution. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, all of which
together shall constitute one Agreement, and copies of signatures delivered electronically
or by facsimile shall be deemed the same as original signatures.
Full and Final Settlement Agreement: St. Clair Land Company v. City of Lino Lakes
Page 3 of 3
_____________________________
Date
For St. Clair Land Company
By:
Jamie Jensen
_____________________________
Date
For City of Lino Lakes
By:
Rob Rafferty
Its: Mayor
_____________________________
Date
For City of Lino Lakes
By:
Julie Bartell
Its: City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1I
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Acceptance Monetary Donation for Police Equipment
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting council approval to accept a monetary
donation from the Coss Family Foundation for the purchase of police equipment.
BACKGROUND
The Coss Family Foundation has made previous monetary donation to the City of Lino Lakes in
support of the police canine program within the Public Safety Department. This foundation would
like to donate $20,000 for the purchase of needed police equipment.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council accept a monetary donation in the amount of $20,000 for the purchase
of police equipment.
ATTACHMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1J
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy Clerk
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Advisory Board Appointment
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Each year, the City council appoints or reappoints citizens to serve on council advisory
boards/committee.
BACKGROUND
An Interview was conducted with the following results:
Economic Development Advisory Committee – 1 Seat – 1 Applicant
Blakely LaCroix 3 Year Term
RECOMMENDATION
Approve advisory committee appointment as listed above.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1K
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Approval of Resolution No. 22-25,
Individual Massage License for Chanel Littleton, Allure
Salon
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
Chanel Littleton has applied for an Individual Massage License to work at Allure Salon located
at 6511 Ward Road, Suite 190. Allure Salon currently holds an Enterprise Massage License
and has other massage therapists on staff.
Chanel Littleton has met the requirements to be licensed in the city as a massage therapist.
Under city policy, applicants applying for a massage license are required to undergo a
background investigation. The Lino Lakes Public Services Department performs the
investigations and reports any information that would make applicants ineligible for the license.
The background investigation has been completed and the Public Safety Department reports no
reason to deny the license for Chanel Littleton.
Licensee is required to provide identification, to submit verification of proof of accreditation,
work comp insurance if applicable as well as pay appropriate fees. No license will be released
until all requirements are met.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution 22-25 approving an individual massage license for Chanel Littleton for a
period of February 15, 2022 through June 30, 2022.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 22-25
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-25
Approving Individual Massage License
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved regulations that license the practice of massage
therapy in the City.
WHEREAS, the licensing period for Massage Enterprise and Individual Licenses in the City of
Lino Lakes is one year, commencing on July 1 and ending on June 30 the following year;
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed a new application for Individual Massage Therapist from
Chanel Littleton and has verified that local licensing regulations are met;
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Public Service Department has conducted the required background
investigations for the massage therapist license and has found no reason to deny;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the individual massage licenses for Chanel Littleton,
Allure Salon. Approval contingent upon applicants meeting all city and state requirements for
said licenses.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member _____________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1L
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Approval of Civic Complex Renovation Expenditures
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to consider approval of Civic Complex Renovation Expenditures.
BACKGROUND
On September 21, 2020, the City Council awarded bids for the 2020 City Hall Renovation
Project including General Construction, Flooring, and Interior Furnishings to address COVID-19
related short comings with the existing configuration of the Public Services and Community
Development end of City Hall.
Staff has obtained quotes to extend the carpet and office furnishings utilized within the 2020
project to the Administrative end of the City Hall, including office spaces and meeting rooms.
Funding for this project would be provided through the Bldg & Facilities Fund at a not to exceed
amount of $75,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the Civic Complex Renovation Expenditures.
ATTACHMENTS
Flooring Estimate
Work Station Estimate & Layout
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 1 of 19
BILL TO
CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
600 TOWN CENTER PKWY
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
ATTN: RICK DEGARDNER
Phone: 651-982-2444
Email: Rick.degardner@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us
SHIP TO
CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN
600 TOWN CENTER PKWY
LINO LAKES, MN 55014-1182
ATTN: RICK DEGARDNER
Phone: 651-982-2444
Email: Rick.degardner@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us
Teknion CPC contract CPCTEKN.JP.MN.031424
GROUP DESCRIPTION EXTENDED AMOUNT
Workstations 35,540.79
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY LIST UNIT PRICE EXTENDED AMOUNT
TEKNION LLC
BLGC--7
Rectangular Grommet
7:Platinum (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 61.00
12.00
Each
24.00 9.36 112.32
TEKNION LLC
CT22L--~Foundat-J
Cantilever, 22"d
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
15.00
Each
67.00 20.55 308.25
TEKNION LLC
CT22R--~Foundat-J
Cantilever, 22"d
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
15.00
Each
67.00 20.55 308.25
TEKNION LLC
EBFQC--YN
Communications Base Feed
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
1.00
Each
43.00 13.19 13.19
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 2 of 19
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
EKBF8T72--A
Base Feed, 8-Wire Isolated Ground, 72" long
A:Canada/USA
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
1.00
Each
331.00 101.52 101.52
TEKNION LLC
EKBH8T072--A
Power Harness, 8-Wire Isolated Ground, 72" long
A:Canada/USA
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
1.00
Each
210.00 64.41 64.41
TEKNION LLC
EKBH8T096--A
Power Harness, 8-Wire Isolated Ground, 96" long
A:Canada/USA
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
238.00 72.99 437.94
TEKNION LLC
EKBH8T144--A
Power Harness, 8-Wire Isolated Ground, 144" long
A:Canada/USA
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
5.00
Each
306.00 93.85 469.25
TEKNION LLC
EKQPD--8T-00R-A
Power Box, Double Length
8T:8-Wire Isolated Ground
00R:Standard Bracket
A:Canada/USA
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
9.00
Each
214.00 65.63 590.67
TEKNION LLC
EKROS--1-A-YN
Receptacle Outlet, Standard 15 Amp
1:Single, Circuit 1
A:Canada/USA
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
4.00
Each
36.00 11.04 44.16
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 3 of 19
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
EKROS--2-A-YN
Receptacle Outlet, Standard 15 Amp
2:Single, Circuit 2
A:Canada/USA
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
36.00 11.04 44.16
TEKNION LLC
EKROS--3-A-YN
Receptacle Outlet, Standard 15 Amp
3:Single, Circuit 3 (use with 8T)
A:Canada/USA
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
36.00 11.04 44.16
TEKNION LLC
EKROS--5-A-YN
Receptacle Outlet, Standard 15 Amp
5:Single, Circuit 5
A:Canada/USA
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
36.00 11.04 44.16
ESI ERGONOMIC SOLUTIONS - FELLOWES (ISG - ESI)
EVOLVE2-MS--SLV
Evolve Series Dual Monitor Arm w/ 2 motion limbs & 2 sliders
SLV:Silver
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 46.67
6.00
Each
930.00 496.00 2,976.00
TEKNION LLC
KBC--~Foundat-J
Corner Bracket
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
12.00
Each
40.00 12.27 147.24
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 4 of 19
% Off List: 69.32
TEKNION LLC
KCC423--~Foundat-J
Three-Way Connector, 42"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
105.00 32.20 193.20
TEKNION LLC
KCC424--~Foundat-J
Four-Way Connector, 42"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
82.00 25.15 50.30
TEKNION LLC
KCCN4290--~Foundat-J-~
Two-Way Connector 90 Degree, 42"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
157.00 48.15 192.60
TEKNION LLC
KCI303--~Foundat-J-~
Three-Way Intermediate Connector, 30"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
104.00 31.90 191.40
TEKNION LLC
KCI304--~Foundat-J-~
Four-Way Intermediate Connector, 30"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
99.00 30.36 60.72
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 5 of 19
TEKNION LLC
KCIN3090--~Foundat-J
Two-Way Intermediate Connector 90 Degree, 30"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
107.00 32.82 131.28
TEKNION LLC
KDNBBF2215--~Foundat-J-K-1-~
Pedestal, Box, Box, File, 22"d
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
K:Key Alike
1:Yes
~:No Counterweight
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
660.00 202.42 1,214.52
TEKNION LLC
KDNLF2215--~Foundat-J-K-1-~
Pedestal, Large File, File, 22"d
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
K:Key Alike
1:Yes
~:No Counterweight
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
617.00 189.23 1,135.38
TEKNION LLC
KECS13648--~1-~12-T727-YN
Acoustic Power/Comm. Element, Standard Width, Power only, 36"h
x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
3.00
Each
330.00 101.21 303.63
TEKNION LLC
KECS13648--~1-~12-T727-YN
Acoustic Power/Comm. Element, Standard Width, Power only, 36"h
3.00
Each
330.00 101.21 303.63
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 6 of 19
x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KECS23636--~1-~12-T727-YN
Acoustic Power/Comm. Element, Standard Width, Power & Comm.,
36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
277.00 84.96 169.92
TEKNION LLC
KECS23636--~1-~12-T727-YN
Acoustic Power/Comm. Element, Standard Width, Power & Comm.,
36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
YN:Platinum Grey Coordinate
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
277.00 84.96 339.84
TEKNION LLC
KESS3036--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
172.00 52.75 211.00
TEKNION LLC
KESS3036--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
4.00
Each
172.00 52.75 211.00
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 7 of 19
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KESS3036--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
8.00
Each
172.00 52.75 422.00
TEKNION LLC
KESS3036--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
8.00
Each
172.00 52.75 422.00
TEKNION LLC
KESS3048--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
207.00 63.49 380.94
TEKNION LLC
KESS3048--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 30"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
207.00 63.49 380.94
TEKNION LLC
KESS3624--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 24"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
12.00
Each
168.00 51.53 618.36
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 8 of 19
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KESS3624--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 24"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
12.00
Each
168.00 51.53 618.36
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
228.00 69.93 139.86
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
228.00 69.93 139.86
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
228.00 69.93 139.86
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
4.00
Each
228.00 69.93 279.72
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 9 of 19
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
8.00
Each
228.00 69.93 559.44
TEKNION LLC
KESS3636--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 36"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
8.00
Each
228.00 69.93 559.44
TEKNION LLC
KESS3648--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
5.00
Each
280.00 85.88 429.40
TEKNION LLC
KESS3648--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
5.00
Each
280.00 85.88 429.40
TEKNION LLC
KESS3648--~1-~12-T727
6.00
Each
280.00 85.88 515.28
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 10 of 19
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KESS3648--~1-~12-T727
Acoustic Element, Standard Width, 36"h x 48"w
~1:Teknion Fabric Gr.1
~12:Emit
T727:Watt
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
280.00 85.88 515.28
TEKNION LLC
KPOF3036--~Foundat-J-~-~
Panel Add-On, 30"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
146.00 44.78 179.12
TEKNION LLC
KPOF3036--~Foundat-J-~-~
Panel Add-On, 30"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
8.00
Each
146.00 44.78 358.24
TEKNION LLC
KPOF3048--~Foundat-J-~-~
Panel Add-On, 30"h x 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
6.00
Each
162.00 49.69 298.14
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 11 of 19
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KPOGS3024--5-~Foundat-J-~
Panel Add-On - Single Glass, 30"h x 24"w
5:Clear
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
12.00
Each
708.00 217.14 2,605.68
TEKNION LLC
KPOGS3048--5-~Foundat-J-~
Panel Add-On - Single Glass, 30"h x 48"w
5:Clear
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
935.00 286.76 573.52
TEKNION LLC
KPOGS3072--5-~Foundat-J-~
Panel Add-On - Single Glass, 30"h x 72"w
5:Clear
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
1,230.00 377.24 754.48
TEKNION LLC
KPOGS3096--5-~Foundat-J-~
Panel Add-On - Single Glass, 30"h x 96"w
5:Clear
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
3.00
Each
1,527.00 468.33 1,404.99
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4224--~Foundat-J-~-~
12.00
Each
158.00 48.46 581.52
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 12 of 19
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 24"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4236--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
178.00 54.59 109.18
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4236--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
178.00 54.59 109.18
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4236--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
178.00 54.59 218.36
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4236--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
8.00
Each
178.00 54.59 436.72
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 13 of 19
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4248--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
5.00
Each
203.00 62.26 311.30
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4248--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
3.00
Each
203.00 62.26 186.78
TEKNION LLC
KPWT4248--~Foundat-J-~-~
Conventional Panel - Standard, 42"h x 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
~:Bare Frame
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
203.00 62.26 373.56
TEKNION LLC
KTE42--~Foundat-J-~
Panel End Trim, 42"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.34
12.00
Each
35.00 10.73 128.76
TEKNION LLC 12.00 31.00 9.51 114.12
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 14 of 19
KTI30--~Foundat-J-~
Intermediate Panel End Trim, 30"h
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
~:Wide Gasket
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.32
Each
TEKNION LLC
KTR24--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 24"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.32
12.00
Each
34.00 10.43 125.16
TEKNION LLC
KTR36--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
42.00 12.88 25.76
TEKNION LLC
KTR36--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
2.00
Each
42.00 12.88 25.76
TEKNION LLC
KTR36--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
4.00
Each
42.00 12.88 51.52
TEKNION LLC
KTR36--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 36"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
8.00
Each
42.00 12.88 103.04
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 15 of 19
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
KTR48--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
5.00
Each
49.00 15.03 75.15
TEKNION LLC
KTR48--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
3.00
Each
49.00 15.03 45.09
TEKNION LLC
KTR48--~Foundat-J
Top Trim, 48"w
~Foundat:Foundation Colors
J:Granite (Satin)
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
49.00 15.03 90.18
TEKNION LLC
KWS2472--~A-JG-8-SV
Rectangular Worksurface, 24"d x 72"w
~A:Foundation Laminate
JG:Stainless
8:Flat Edge Trim
SV:Stainless
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
568.00 174.21 1,045.26
TEKNION LLC
KWSC244824--~A-JG-8-SV
Curved Corner Worksurface, 24"dA x 48"w x 24"dB
~A:Foundation Laminate
JG:Stainless
8:Flat Edge Trim
12.00
Each
904.00 277.26 3,327.12
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 16 of 19
SV:Stainless
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
TEKNION LLC
SOKL02
Set of Keys Alike, 2 Sets of Cores
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 0.00
6.00
Each
0.00 0.00 0.00
TEKNION LLC
WBX92370NRB--~A-JG-6-SV-60
Rect HA WS w/Conn Kit for hiSpace QuickConnect,Extd Elec,
23"dx70"w,No Screen Frm,Rect,L & R
~A:Foundation Laminate
JG:Stainless
6:Straight Trim
SV:Stainless
60:Platinum
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
736.00 225.73 1,354.38
TEKNION LLC
YSX92370N--60-D-1-3-N
hiSpace QuickConnect HA Freestanding Table Mech,Extd Elec
(22.6"-48"7),23"dx70"w,No Scrn Frm Prov
60:Platinum
D:Display with Up/Down Memory
1:Cable Organizer with Felt Cover
3:Dual Plastic Trays + Powerbar
N:None
Tag: Tag L1: Workstations
% Off List: 69.33
6.00
Each
1,937.00 594.08 3,564.48
GROUP DESCRIPTION EXTENDED AMOUNT
Z Services Installation and design 6,015.00
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY LIST UNIT PRICE EXTENDED AMOUNT
INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS (IOS)
FURNDESIGN
Furniture Design Services
Tag: Tag L1: z services
% Off List: 0.00
1.00
Each
0.00 525.00 525.00
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 17 of 19
ODYSSEY COMMERCIAL INTERIORS INC.
FURNINSTALL
Furniture Installation of new Teknion workstations, quote 11244
Tag: Tag L1: z services
% Off List: 0.00
1.00
Each
0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
ODYSSEY COMMERCIAL INTERIORS INC.
FURNINSTALL
Furniture Installation - Teardown and disposal of existing
workstations, quote 11244
Tag: Tag L1: z services
% Off List: 0.00
1.00
Each
0.00 1,490.00 1,490.00
Remit to address for deposits:
INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS –
LOCKBOX # 131434
PO BOX 1414
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55480 – 1414
PROPOSAL VALID FOR 14 DAYS
SUBTOTAL $41,555.79
TOTAL $41,555.79
REQUIRED DEPOSIT 50.0%$20,777.90
Thank you for the opportunity to partner together. Please review the quotation and let us know if you have any questions.
Signature: _________________________Name:_______________________ Title:___________________ Date: ___________
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 18 of 19
THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY
We are thrilled for the opportunity to partner together on your project. The terms and conditions below outline a working understanding for the
project journey and is intended to set both organizations up for success. If you have questions or concerns, please contact us directly.
QUOTES AND PRICING
Please review your final project plan and quote to confirm it will fit your space and workplace needs. Quoted prices are good for 14 days from
the date of the proposal. Due to the volatile transportation conditions in 2021, freight will be billed based upon actual. Unless otherwise noted,
prices quoted do not include sales, use, excise, or other applicable taxes. Any applicable taxes will be added or adjusted on the invoice at the
time of billing. Buyers exempt from taxes should provide Innovative with copies of exemption certificates prior to placing the order.
DESIGN AND ORDERING
Innovative’s Design team will work with you and/or your team to design a space that is customized to your budget, style and unique needs to
transform your space/s and bring your vision to life. If you do not want to move forward with us on a project, the design work remains the
exclusive property of Innovative Office Solutions and we reserve the right to invoice you for the design costs incurred.
NEED FOR DEPOSITS
A deposit of 50% of the order is required on all projects in excess of $5,000. The deposit is essential as our vendor partners require payment
from us when placing orders. Once the deposit is received, we will place your order. Payments must be in the form of check, ACH or wire
transfer. Credit cards are not accepted for deposits or other furniture payments over $5,000.
PAYMENT TERMS
Our Innovative team will send invoices following delivery and installation completion. To ensure a seamless accounting experience, please send
payment within 30 days of the invoice date. It is not uncommon for a project to be substantially complete, except for a few punch list items. We
appreciate you paying your invoice in full. Innovative will complete your project when outstanding items and/or parts become available.
CHANGES
Once we receive the sign off on design plan and proposed budget, your order will be placed. Due to the customization of many projects, once
orders are placed, most products are not returnable. Modifications or cancellations may result in cancellation or restocking charges by our
manufacturer partners. Unfortunately, we will need to invoice you if such charges are incurred. Where a Scope of Work is included with this
Agreement, costs resulting from changes in the scope of the project, including any additional requirements or restrictions placed on Innovative
will be added to the project price. When Innovative becomes aware of the nature and impact of the change, you will be notified, and all project
paperwork will be updated as necessary. In this instance, a revised quote will be generated for signoff.
PROJECT DELAYS AND STORAGE
We understand projects are occasionally delayed. This may mean you are unable to accept product from us as scheduled. When this occurs,
Innovative will store your items at no charge for up to 30 days to provide you with additional time to ensure your space is ready for installation.
After 30 days, we will provide a quote to continue to store your product, as we want to make sure it is safe and in a secure location.
DELIVERY AND RECEIPT OF PRODUCT
We will contact you once we are notified your product has been shipped and is on its way. Your product will be delivered during regular
business hours. In order to provide an exceptional delivery experience, we ask that you inform us of any unique circumstances that a driver or
install team may face during a delivery. This may include such challenges as a downtown location or the need for a liftgate. Providing us with
this information ensures that product is delivered to the proper location within your facility and will reduce the I chances of damage to any of
the items.
952.808.9900 | 866.574.5389
INNOVATIVEOS.COM
SALES PERSON Chris Foss
651-486-1231
cfoss@innovativeos.com
FURNITURE PROPOSAL -
DEPOSIT INVOICE
DATE 02/10/2022
CUSTOMER NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES - FURN ACCT
CUSTOMER NUMBER C110752
CUSTOMER PO phase 2
ORDER NAME Phase II Tek stations
ORDER NUMBER 204911
PROJECT NUMBER
TERMS NET30
Page 19 of 19
We kindly ask you to inspect all product directly shipped and/or delivered and brought onto the job site as scheduled. If you discover product
has been damaged or shipped in error during the receiving process, please notify us within 24 hours to ensure that appropriate claims can be
filed. After product arrives at your site, any loss or damage caused by other trades or by weather, fire or other elements is your responsibility.
INSTALLATION PREMISES CONDITIONS
It is our sincere priority to make sure the installation of your product is timely, professional, and as efficient as possible. To facilitate this, we ask
the site to be clean, clear, and free of debris prior to installation. The jobsite should have proper lighting, heat, power source, hoisting and/or
elevator service and suitable unobstructed dock space and a secured staging area. The job site shall also be free of the interference of other
trades in the area where installation is taking place.
We understand in certain situations spaces are not ready for installation when the initial date was scheduled. If this is the case, please provide at
least a 48-hour notice so we can keep your project on track to the best of our ability. If proper, timely communication does not occur,
unfortunately additional charges may be invoiced to cover costs incurred. Our Installation Team installs product based on the final approved
layout. If there are any changes to the final plan, please make sure these are addressed prior to the installation date.
WARRANTY
Each manufacturing partner of Innovative has a warranty standard. For more information on warranty details, reach out to your Innovative
Account Executive. Warrantied product replacements may require billable installation services.
CLAIMS
Innovative will help resolve claims concerning damaged and/or defective product, materials and/or workmanship made within the warranty
period as stated by the manufacturer, supplier, or fabricator. We will arrange for the repair or replacement of any damaged or defective items
and/or installation to make sure the project is successful.
FORCE MAJEURE
We will do our absolute best to ensure we can secure and install your product, but if there are reasons beyond our control, Innovative will not be
liable. Reasons include but are not limited to, strikes, pandemics, embargos, war or other breakout of hostilities, acts of God, machinery
breakdowns, delays of carriers or suppliers, and domestic or foreign governmental acts or regulations.
GOVERNING LAW
This agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota.
ARBITRATION
We want to make this a true partnership and resolve any issues that may occur. Any controversies or claims arising relating to this contract will
be settled by arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association. They will fall under its commercial rules, and judgment on the
award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court with authority. The award shall include the costs of arbitration and the legal
fees of the prevailing party.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTNERSHIP
Innovative Office Solutions is built upon a “relationships matter” belief system, and every project matters to us. We are thankful for the
opportunity to partner together and we look forward to serving you!
___________________________________Authorized Signature _________________Date
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Approval of the 2022 Pay Equity Report
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to consider approval of the 2022 Pay Equity Report.
BACKGROUND
The Local Government Pay Equity Act, M.S. 471.991-471.999 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter
3920 require local government jurisdictions to submit a Pay Equity Report to the State of
Minnesota every three years. The City is required to report in 2022. This report must show wages
in place as of December 31, 2021.
The Minnesota Pay Equity Act was passed by the legislature in 1984. Pay Equity is a method of
eliminating discrimination against women who are paid less than men for jobs requiring
comparable levels of expertise. Pay Equity attempts to eliminate gender-based inequalities.
Minnesota Rules, Chapter 3920 specify the procedure for measuring and reporting compliance.
Staff has conducted the required statistical analysis for the 2022 Pay Equity Report. The City
was found to be in compliance with the Act.
The Council is required to accept this report, which will then be forwarded to the Pay Equity
Office of Minnesota Management & Budget for review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the 2022 Pay Equity Report.
ATTACHMENTS
1) 2022 Pay Equity Report
2) Guide to Understanding Pay Equity
Pay Equity Implementation Report
Part A: Jurisdiction Identification
Jurisdiction:Lino Lakes Jurisdiction Type:City
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Contact:Sarah Cotton Phone:(651) 982-2410 E-Mail:scotton@linolakes.us
Part B: Official Verification
1.The job evaluation system used measured
skill, effort responsibility and working
conditions and the same system was used for
all classes of employees.
The system was used: Consultant
Description:
The City of Lino Lakes adopted a new job
evaluation system effective January 1, 2021.
The City has implemented the Keystone
Compensation Classification System, as
approved by the City Council on December
14, 2020.
2.Health Insurance benefits for male and
female classes of comparable value have
been evaluated and:
There is no difference and female classes are
not at a disadvantage.
3.An official notice has been posted at:
City Hall, Public Safety & Public Works
Facilities
(prominent location)
informing employees that the Pay Equity
Implementation Report has been filed and is
available to employees upon request. A copy
of the notice has been sent to each exclusive
representative, if any, and also to the public
library.
The report was approved by:
Lino Lakes City Council
(governing body)
Rob Rafferty
(chief elected official)
Mayor
(title)
Part C: Total Payroll
$6039017.12
is the annual payroll for the calendar year just
ended December 31.
[ ]Checking this box indicates the following:
- signature of chief elected official
- approval by governing body
- all information is complete and accurate,
and
- all employees over which the jurisdiction has
final budgetary authority are included
Date Submitted:2/8/2022
Page 1 of 1 2/8/2022 12:14:11 PM
Compliance Report
Jurisdiction:Lino Lakes Report Year:2022
600 Town Center Parkway Case:5 - 2021PayEquityReporting
(Shared (Jur and MMB))
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Contact:Sarah Cotton Phone:(651) 982-2410 E-Mail:scotton@linolakes.us
The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information
from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results.
For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports.
I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION
Male Classes Female Classes Balanced Classes All Job Classes
# Job Classes 14 16 2 32
# Employees 31 18 21 70
Avg. Max Monthly Pay per employee 7526.45 6551.94 7133.19
II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST
A. Underpayment Ratio = 76.19048 *
Male Classes Female Classes
a. # At or above Predicted Pay 8 7
b. # Below Predicted Pay 6 9
c. TOTAL 14 16
d. % Below Predicted Pay (b divided by c = d)42.86 56.25
*(Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.)
B. T-test Results
Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 47 Value of T = 0.642
a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = 23
b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = -4
III. SALARY RANGE TEST = 111.11 (Result is A divided by B)
A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 7.50
B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = 6.75
IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = 0.00 (Result is B divided by A)
A. % of male classes receiving ESP = 0.00 *
B. % of female classes receiving ESP = 0.00
*(If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00)
Page 1 of 1 2/8/2022 12:04:26 PM
Job Class Data Entry Verification ListCase:2021PayEquityReportingLino LakesLGID:671Job NbrClass TitleNbrMalesNbrFemalesNon-BinaryClassTypeJobsPointsMin MoSalaryMax Mo SalaryYrs to Max SalaryYrs ofServiceExceptional Service Pay1Office Specialist010F2523901.004589.006.000.002PT Community Service Officer110B2693901.004589.006.000.003Accounting Clerk I010F2804293.005050.006.000.004Police Records Technician020F2814293.005050.006.000.005Deputy City Clerk010F2854293.005050.006.000.006Public Safety Admin Assistant010F2854293.005050.006.000.007Investigative Assistant010F2854293.005050.006.000.008Administrative Assistant020F2904293.005050.006.000.009Building Permit Technician010F2904293.005050.006.000.0032Parks Maintenance Worker300M2994707.005537.006.000.0010Streets Maintenance Worker600M3034707.005537.006.000.0012Accounting Clerk II010F3054707.005537.006.000.0011Utilities Maintenance Worker300M3084707.005537.006.000.0013Communications Specialist010F3235196.006114.006.000.0014Mechanic100M3405196.006114.006.000.0015Building Inspector200M3675724.006734.006.000.0017City Clerk010F3766213.007310.006.000.0016Police Officer1360B3856213.007310.006.000.0018Public Works Supervisor300M3906213.007310.006.000.0020Accountant010F3906213.007310.006.000.0019Environmental Coordinator100M3936213.007310.006.000.0021City Planner010F4146351.007939.009.000.0022Sergeant410M4526946.008682.009.000.0023Building Official100M4666946.008682.009.000.0024HR and Communications Manager010F4877386.009232.009.000.0025Public Safety Captain100M5297831.009790.009.000.0026Deputy Public Safety Director200M5768336.0010419.009.000.0027Finance Director010F6188790.0010987.009.000.0028Public Services Director100M6869258.0011571.009.000.0029Community Development Director100M6959258.0011571.009.000.0030Public Safety Director100M7559753.0012192.009.000.00Page 1 of 22/8/2022 12:04:28 PM
Job Class Data Entry Verification ListCase:2021PayEquityReportingLino LakesLGID:671Job NbrClass TitleNbrMalesNbrFemalesNon-BinaryClassTypeJobsPointsMin MoSalaryMax Mo SalaryYrs to Max SalaryYrs ofServiceExceptional Service Pay31City Administrator010F84010774.0013467.009.000.00Job Number Count: 32Page 2 of 22/8/2022 12:04:28 PM
Predicted Pay Report for: Lino LakesCase:2021PayEquityReportingPage 1 of 32/8/2022 12:04:30 PM
Predicted Pay Report for: Lino LakesCase:2021PayEquityReportingJob NbrJob TitleNbrMalesNbrFemalesNon-BinaryTotalNbrJob TypeJobPointsMax Mo SalaryPredicted PayPay Difference1Office Specialist0101Female2524589.00004609.1695-20.16952PT Community Service Officer1102Balanced2694589.00004916.8615-327.86153Accounting Clerk I0101Female2805050.00005115.9563-65.95634Police Records Technician0202Female2815050.00005134.0558-84.05585Deputy City Clerk0101Female2855050.00005206.4539-156.45396Public Safety Admin Assistant0101Female2855050.00005206.4539-156.45397Investigative Assistant0101Female2855050.00005206.4539-156.45398Administrative Assistant0202Female2905050.00005296.9516-246.95169Building Permit Technician0101Female2905050.00005296.9516-246.951632Parks Maintenance Worker3003Male2995537.00005459.847377.152710Streets Maintenance Worker6006Male3035537.00005532.24554.754512Accounting Clerk II0101Female3055537.00005568.4445-31.444511Utilities Maintenance Worker3003Male3085537.00005622.7431-85.743113Communications Specialist0101Female3236114.00005894.2361219.763914Mechanic1001Male3406114.00006259.0410-145.041015Building Inspector2002Male3676734.00006744.9833-10.983317City Clerk0101Female3767310.00006957.6900352.310016Police Officer136019Balanced3857310.00007170.3966139.603420Accountant0101Female3907310.00007288.566921.433118Public Works Supervisor3003Male3907310.00007288.566921.433119Environmental Coordinator1001Male3937310.00007359.4691-49.469121City Planner0101Female4147939.00007800.6464138.353622Sergeant4105Male4528682.00008540.3386141.661423Building Official1001Male4668682.00008814.9738-132.973824HR and Communications Manager0101Female4879232.00009156.205975.794125Public Safety Captain1001Male5299790.00009751.477638.522426Deputy Public Safety Director2002Male57610419.000010297.9134121.086627Finance Director0101Female61810987.000010841.8807145.119328Public Services Director1001Male68611571.000011531.169039.831029Community Development Director1001Male69511571.000011616.8251-45.825130Public Safety Director1001Male75512192.000012186.00585.994231City Administrator0101Female84013467.000012992.9032474.0968Page 2 of 32/8/2022 12:04:30 PM
Predicted Pay Report for: Lino LakesCase:2021PayEquityReportingJob NbrJob TitleNbrMalesNbrFemalesNon-BinaryTotalNbrJob TypeJobPointsMax Mo SalaryPredicted PayPay DifferenceJob Number Count: 32Page 3 of 32/8/2022 12:04:30 PM
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance – 10/16
Guide to Understanding
Pay Equity
Compliance
Pay Equity Office
Minnesota Management & Budget
400 Centennial Office Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155
Local Government Pay Equity Webpage
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance – 10/16
Table of Contents
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance ......................................................................................... 1
Tests for Compliance .................................................................................................................................... 2
Compliance Report ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Method Used for Predicted Pay Calculation ............................................................................................. 8
Alternative Analysis Test ............................................................................................................................ 12
Salary Range Test ....................................................................................................................................... 16
Exceptional Service Pay Test...................................................................................................................... 17
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 1
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance
This booklet gives a general overview of how data from the local government reports is analyzed and how
the tests for compliance are conducted. Complete details of compliance requirements are in Minnesota
Rules Chapter 3920.
This booklet also describes the computer software developed by MMB. This software calculates several
of the tests for compliance and the reports produced by the software are explained on pages three through
five.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 2
Tests for Compliance
1. Completeness and Accuracy Test -
determines whether jurisdictions have filed
reports on time, included correct data and
supplied all required information.
2. Statistical Analysis Test - described on
pages three through five, compares salary
data to determine if female classes are paid
consistently below male classes of
comparable work value (job points). MMB
has developed software that calculates the
results for this test. This test is generally
applied to larger jurisdictions. For smaller
jurisdictions, the alternative analysis is used.
3. Alternative Analysis Test - described on
pages 14 through 17, compares salary data
to determine if female classes are paid
below male classes even though the female
classes have similar or greater work value
(job points). The software is not used for
this test.
4. Salary Range Test - described on page 18,
compares the average number of years it
takes for individuals to move through salary
ranges established for female classes
compared to male classes. This test only
applies to jurisdictions that have a system
where there is an established number of
years to move through salary ranges.
5. Exceptional Service Pay Test - described
on page 19, compares how often individuals
in male classes receive longevity or
performance pay above the normal salary
range compared to how often individuals in
female classes receive this type of pay. This
test applies only to jurisdictions that have a
system that includes exceptional service pay.
Determining Whether the Alternative or
Statistical Analysis Will Be Used
1. Alternative analysis - jurisdiction has:
• Three or fewer male classes.
NOTE: Jurisdictions with three or
fewer male classes may want to skip
over the information on pages two
through seven describing the statistical
analysis and computer reports.
2. Statistical analysis - jurisdiction has:
• Six or more male classes and at least
one class with an established salary
range, or
• Four or five male classes and an
underpayment ratio of 80% or more.
May or may not have classes with an
established salary range.
3. Start in statistical analysis but go to
alternative analysis - jurisdiction has:
• Four or five male classes and an
underpayment ratio below 80%, or
• An underpayment ratio below 80%, six
or more male classes, but no classes
with a salary range.
Explanation of Computer Reports
Information contained in the next few pages is
intended to explain the three reports produced by
the Pay Equity Management System Software.
Look at the sample reports as you read the
following explanations. Each numbered
explanation corresponds to a shaded number on
the examples on pages three, five and six. For
informational purposes, a sample of a graph
produced with the Pay Equity Analysis software
is shown on page seven.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 3
Compliance Report
The statistical analysis, salary range and
exceptional service pay test results are shown
below. Part I is general information from the
Pay Equity Implementation Report data. Parts
II, III and IV of the Compliance Report give test
results. For more detail on each test, refer to
Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 4
Compliance Report
Explanations below correspond to shaded
numbers on page three.
1. Average Maximum Monthly Salary for
Employees in Male Classes
2. Average Maximum Monthly Salary for
Employees in Female Classes
3. Overall Average Maximum Monthly
Salary for an Employee
4. Underpayment Ratio
The minimum requirement to pass the
statistical analysis test is an underpayment
ratio of 80%. The underpayment ratio is
calculated by dividing the percentage of
male classes below predicted pay (item five)
by the percentage of female classes below
predicted pay (item six). In the example on
page three, 37.5 ÷ 25 = 150%. Jurisdictions
with an underpayment ratio below 80% can
improve their score by increasing salaries
for female classes to at or above predicted
pay. More details regarding predicted pay
are on pages six through 13.
If the underpayment ratio is less than 80%, a
jurisdiction may still pass the statistical
analysis test if the t-test results (explained in
item 7) are not statistically significant. The
t-test measures the average dollar difference
from predicted pay for male and female
classes.
5. Percentage of Male Classes Below
Predicted Pay
This percentage is calculated by dividing the
number of male classes below predicted pay
by the overall total of male classes. In the
example on page three, the total of male
classes is eight, and three fall below
predicted pay. Therefore, 3 ÷ 8 = 37.50%.
6. Percentage of Female Classes Below
Predicted Pay
This percentage is calculated by dividing the
number of female classes below predicted
pay by the overall total of female classes. In
the example on page three, the total of
female classes is four and one of those falls
below predicted pay. Therefore, 1 ÷ 4 =
25%.
7. T-Test & Degrees of Freedom
These numbers are used only for
jurisdictions with an underpayment ratio
below 80%, at least six male classes and at
least one class with a salary range. If the
underpayment ratio is 80% or more, these
numbers are not used nor are they used for
jurisdictions in the alternative analysis.
These numbers show the average dollar
amount that males and females are from
predicted pay and answer the question: Are
females paid less than males on average and,
is the underpayment of females statistically
significant?
To determine if these numbers show
statistical significance, they must be checked
against the table on page five. Find the DF
number in the “Degrees of Freedom”
column and then look across for the “Value
of T.” If the “value of t” on the compliance
report is less than the “value of t” on the
table, it means that either there is no
underpayment of female classes or that the
underpayment is not statistically significant.
If the t-test number is the same or more than
the “value of t” on the table, the
underpayment for female classes is
statistically significant and the jurisdiction
would not pass the test.
Salary increases for female classes sufficient
to eliminate statistical significance would
allow a jurisdiction to pass the statistical
analysis test even with an underpayment
ratio below 80%.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 5
In the example on page three, t-test results
would not be used because the
underpayment ratio is above 80%, but let's
assume we needed to check these results.
First, we would find 16 in the DF column
and then look across to find the value of t at
1.746. Since our t-test number is -3.732,
well below the value of t on the table, these
results would show that on average, females
are not underpaid compared to males.
T-Test Table (5% Significance)
DF Value of t DF Value of t DF Value of t
1 6.314 12 1.782 23 1.714 2 2.920 13 1.771 24 1.711 3 2.353 14 1.761 25 1.708 4 2.132 15 1.753 26 1.706 5 2.015 16 1.746 27 1.703 6 1.943 17 1.740 28 1.701 7 1.895 18 1.734 29 1.699 8 1.860 19 1.729 30 1.697 9 1.833 20 1.725 40 1.684 10 1.812 21 1.721 60 1.671 11 1.796 22 1.717 120 1.658
Infinity 1.645
While the entire method for calculating t-test
results cannot be explained here, it is a
commonly accepted mathematical technique
for measuring statistical significance. The
formula is fairly complex, but basically it
factors in predicted pay, the dollar
difference from predicted pay and the
number of employees. The DF number is
the total number of employees in male or
female dominated classes only, minus two.
8. Average Dollar Amount Male Classes are
Above or Below Predicted Pay
In the example on page three, the maximum
monthly salary for male classes, on average,
is $2 above predicted pay.
9. Average Dollar Amount Female Classes
are Above or Below Predicted Pay
In the example on page three, the maximum
monthly salary for female classes, on
average, is $75 above predicted pay.
10. Salary Range Test
This number must be either 0% or 80% or
more to pass this test. In the example on
page three, 105.71% is passing.
Jurisdictions not passing this test can pass it
by reducing the number of years it takes for
female classes to reach maximum salaries,
increasing the number of years for males to
reach maximum salaries, or some
combination of both. A result of 0% would
mean that either there are no male classes
with an established number of years to move
through a salary range, no female classes
with an established number of years to move
through a salary range, or both. A
description of how the salary range test is
calculated is on page 18.
11. Exceptional Service Pay Test
This number must be either 0% or 80% or
more to pass this test. In the example on
page three, 50% is not passing. Jurisdictions
not passing this test can pass it by either
increasing the number of female classes that
receive exceptional service pay, decreasing
the number of male classes that receive
exceptional service pay, or some
combination of both. A result of 0% could
mean that fewer than 20% of male classes
receive exceptional service pay or that no
female classes receive exceptional service
pay. A description of how the exceptional
service pay test is calculated is on page 19.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 6
1 2
Statistical Analysis
Explanations correspond to shaded numbers below.
This report can be printed after the results are computed. The predicted pay and pay difference columns
are helpful in analyzing the cost of adjusting the salary for any given class.
1. Predicted Pay
The most simplistic definition of predicted pay is that it is the average pay of male classes at any
given point value. Predicted pay is calculated by averaging the maximum monthly salaries for male
classes in the jurisdiction. It is the standard for comparing how males and females are compensated.
Predicted pay is a mirror, or reflection, of the current compensation practice within a jurisdiction for
male classes, but is not necessarily the salary that "should" be paid at any particular point level.
Specific details of the method used to calculate predicted pay is explained in pages eight through 13.
The graph on page seven shows a “predicted pay line” and how male and female classes scatter
around that line. Predicted pay amounts are determined only from the jurisdiction itself, not from any
external factors or salaries.
2. Pay Difference
Shows the dollar amount that maximum monthly salaries fall above or below predicted pay. If a
jurisdiction does not pass the statistical test and needs to increase salaries for female classes, either to
reach an underpayment ratio of 80% or eliminate the statistical significance of the t-test, this
information is useful in calculating the cost. For example, the cost to increase the female class of
“stage manager” to predicted pay would be $6.20 per month.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 7
Predicted Pay Graph
.
Job Class Data Entry List Report
Shows the data that has been entered for computation. This report should be carefully reviewed before
computing the results. If any errors are found, they must be corrected before computing results.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 8
Method Used for Predicted Pay Calculation in the Statistical Analysis
The following explanation is a general description of how predicted pay is calculated but does not include
all details of the formula in Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920.
Basis of the Statistical Analysis
The definition in the Local Government Pay Equity Act for equitable compensation relationship says
“...compensation for female-dominated classes is not consistently below the compensation for male-
dominated classes of comparable value...”
The formula for the statistical analysis is based on three concepts found in the above definition:
comparable value, male compensation and consistently below.
I. Defining “Comparable Value”
Except for classes in the lower and upper 10% of the point range, comparable value is defined by
drawing a 20% window around the job class being analyzed. Each window extends 10% of the range
of points on each side of the class. In the example, there is a range of 200 points from lowest to
highest, so 10% would be 20 points. Each window must have at least three male classes (two of
which have different points) and must include at least 20% of all male classes in the jurisdiction. If
this criteria is not met, the window will expand at 5% increments on either side until the required
number of male classes are included. The drawing below shows one window for one class.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 9
II. Defining “Male Compensation” or “Predicted Pay
A. The first step in defining male compensation is to draw a "mini" regression line through the male
classes in the window.
B. The second step in defining male compensation is to look at the class being analyzed and the
same point on the mini regression line. This point is called predicted pay.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 10
III. Defining “Consistently Below”
A. A determination is made as to whether the class being analyzed falls above or below predicted
pay. In the example, the female class being analyzed is above predicted pay.
B. A new window is drawn when the next class is analyzed. This continues until all classes have
been analyzed.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 11
C. When all the classes have been analyzed, a predicted pay line is drawn.
D. The tabulation of the number of male and female classes above and below the predicted pay line is
made.
For example:
F above = 3 M above = 5
F below = 1 M below = 3
Total = 4 Total = 8
E. The percentage of male and female classes below predicted pay is calculated by dividing the number
of classes below by the total number of classes in each group.
Female classes: 1 ÷ 4 = 25.00%
Male classes: 3 ÷ 8 = 37.50%
F. The percentage of male classes below predicted pay is divided by the percentage of female classes
below predicted pay. This produces the “underpayment ratio.”
37.50% ÷ 25.00% = 150.00%
G. An underpayment ratio below 80% shows that female classes are compensated “consistently below”
male classes of comparable value. If the underpayment ratio is below 80%, further analysis is done to
determine if the underpayment of females is statistically significant. Using the t-test, a determination
is made whether or not the dollar difference is statistically significant. Details of the t-test can be
found on page four.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 12
Alternative Analysis Test
The minimum requirement to pass this test is that:
a. there is no compensation disadvantage for at least 80% of female classes compared to male
classes; or,
b. compensation differences can be accounted for by years of service or performance.
On the next few pages the four possibilities that exist for inequities or a compensation disadvantage are
described.
1. A female class with higher points has less compensation than a male class with lower points.
Example: In this case, the female job class of city clerk has more points but less pay than the male
job class of maintenance supervisor.
Job Title
Type
Class
Points
Max.
Monthly
Salary
City Clerk F 275 $1665
Maint. Sup. M 171 $1925
The minimum requirement to correct this inequity is that the female class must have a salary at least equal
to that of the male class.
Graph illustrating inequity for female job class.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 13
2. A female class has the same points as a male class but less compensation.
Example: In this case, the female job class of secretary and the male job class of maintenance have the
same points but the secretary receives less pay.
Job Title
Type
Class
Points
Max.
Monthly
Salary
City Clerk F 275 $2265
Maintenance M 171 $1900
Secretary F 171 $1630
The minimum requirement to correct this inequity is that the female class must have a salary at least equal
to the male class.
Graph illustrating inequity for female job class.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 14
3. A female class has points between two male classes but compensation is not between or above
the two male classes.
Example: In this case, the female job class of receptionist has points between two male classes but
receives less pay than either of them.
Job Title
Type
Class
Points
Max.
Monthly
Salary
City Clerk F 275 $2370
Maintenance M 171 $1900
Receptionist F 141 $1250
Custodian M 111 $1500
The minimum requirement to correct this inequity is that the female class must have a salary somewhere
between the two male classes.
Graph illustrating inequity for female job class.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 15
4. A female class, rated lower than all male classes, is not compensated as reasonably
proportionate to points as other classes.
Example: In this case, the retail clerk has a salary of $700 per month below the custodian but only six
fewer points. For all other job classes where there is a salary difference, there is a larger difference in
points. For example, the maintenance supervisor’s salary is $300/month less than the police officer and
there is a difference of 23 points.
Job Title
Type
Class
Points
Max.
Monthly
Salary City Clerk/Admin F 275 $3800
Police Officer M 236 $3200
Maintenance Sup M 213 $2900
Admin. Sec. F 173 $2400
Custodian M 111 $1800
Retail Clerk F 105 $1100
While some difference in salary is acceptable due to the point difference, the salary for the retail clerk
with 105 points must be much closer to the salary for the custodian with 111 points. When there is a
question regarding the salary for female class or classes rated lower than all male classes, the judgment is
made on a case-by-case basis, and the main considerations are the relationship of points and pay between
other classes in the jurisdiction and past history of pay relationships that were previously in compliance.
In this case, the minimum requirement to correct this inequity would be that the salary for the retail clerk
would be approximately $1,650/month.
Graph illustrating inequity for female class.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 16
Salary Range Test
This is an example to show how the salary range test is calculated. It is not necessary to calculate this test
manually if the software is being used. If the software is not being used, the following steps will produce
a result for this test. Information is recorded for male or female classes only, not balanced classes. The
information for this example is taken from the Data Entry List Report on page seven.
JURISDICTION: Stageville Theatre
Step 1
Look at the “years to max” column and identify male classes with an established number of years to
move through a salary range.
Title Years to Max
Stage Crew 5
Props Chief 5
Set Tech 5
Lighting Tech 6
Effects Tech 6
Writer 6
Marketing Director 4
7 total classes 37 total years
Step 2
Calculate the average years to reach maximum salary for male classes:
A. Total years from Step 1 37
B. Total classes from Step 1 7
C. Divide 2A by 2B 37 ÷ 7 = 5.28 average years to max
Step 3
Look at the “years to max” column and identify female classes with an established number of years
to move through a salary range.
Title Years to Max
Costume Designer 5
Stage Manager 5
2 total classes 10 total years
Step 4
Calculate the average years to reach maximum salary for female classes:
A. Total years from Step 3 10
B. Total classes from Step 3 2
C. Divide 4A by 4B 10 ÷ 2 = 5 average years to max
Step 5
Divide 2C by 4C and multiply by 100. 5.28 ÷ 5 = 1.05 x 100 = 105%
Enter this result in Part C of the Pay Equity Implementation Report.
Guide to Understanding Pay Equity Compliance Tests – 10/16 Page 17
Exceptional Service Pay Test
This is an example to show how the exceptional service pay test is calculated. It is not necessary to
calculate this test manually if the software is being used. If the software is not being used, the following
steps will produce a result for this test. The information for this example is taken from the Data Entry
List Report on page seven. Information is recorded for male or female classes only, not balanced classes.
Step 1
Look at the “exceptional service pay” column and calculate the percentage of male classes receiving
exceptional service pay.
A. Total number of male classes where an employee
receives exceptional service pay.
4
B. Total number of male classes in the jurisdiction. 8
C. Divide 1A by 1B and multiply by 100. 4 ÷ 8 = .50 x 100 = 50%
If result of 1C is 20% or less, stop here and check appropriate box in Part D of report form.
If result is more than 20%, go on to Step 2.
Step 2
Look at the “exceptional service pay” column and calculate the percentage of female classes
receiving exceptional service pay.
A. Total number of female classes where an employee
receives exceptional service pay.
1
B. Total number of female classes. 4
C. Divide 2A by 2B and multiply by 100. 1 ÷ 4 = .25 x 100 = 25%
Step 3
Calculate the ratio of female/male classes receiving exceptional service pay.
Divide 2C by 1C and multiply by 100. .25 ÷ .50 = .50 x 100 = 50%
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Appointment of Community Service Officer
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Amanda Ulvenes for the vacant
Community Service Officer position.
BACKGROUND
There is currently a Community Service Officer vacancy within the Public Safety Department.
At this time, staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer, and is
recommending the approval of Ulvenes for the position.
Ulvenes is working towards a Bachelor’s Degree in Criminal Justice, is currently a Police
Explorer for the City of Lino Lakes, enlisted in the MN Army National Guard serving as a
Military Police (MP).
The hourly rate would be $23.02, which is the starting rate of the AFSCME Labor Contract. The
wage schedule has six steps. With the Council’s approval, Ulvenes would start in the position of
Community Service Officer on March 1, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Amanda Ulvenes to the Community Service Officer position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Appointment of Public Works Superintendent
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Justin Williams for the Superintendent
position in the Public Works Department.
BACKGROUND
Williams has worked for the City, in various positions within the Public Works department, since
2006. He was promoted to Utilities Supervisor in the fall of 2018.
Williams is currently working towards his Bachelor Degree in Public Administration. Williams
has proven his ability to perform for the City and comes highly recommended.
The hourly rate of pay would be $49.33, which is Step 5 of a 9 step wage scale. With the
Council’s approval, William’s would start in the position immediately.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Justin William’s for the Public Works Superintendent position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Gavin Anderson to the vacant
Utilities Maintenance Worker position in the Public Works department.
BACKGROUND
Staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer, and is recommending
the approval of Gavin Anderson for the position.
Anderson graduated from Coon Rapids High School and has previous Public Works experience
at the City of Brooklyn Center.
The hourly rate of pay would be $28.53, which is Step 1 of the current 6 step wage schedule.
With Council’s approval, Anderson would start in the position on March 1, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Gavin Anderson to the Utilities Maintenance Worker position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Appointment of Police Officer
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Matthew Reineke to a vacant Police
Officer position in the Public Safety Department.
BACKGROUND
There is currently one vacant Police Officer positions within the Public Safety Department. At
this time, staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer, and is
recommending the approval of Matthew Reineke for the position.
Reineke has an Associate’s Degree in Law Enforcement from Century College and Bachelor’s
Degree in Environment Science from St. Thomas University. He has met all POST mandates.
The hourly rate of pay would be $36.66 which is the Starting wage of the union wage schedule.
The wage schedule has six steps.
With the Council’s approval, Reineke would start in the position of Police Officer on February
28, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Matthew Reineke for the Police Officer position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Acceptance Equipment Donation from Shield 616
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting council approval to accept a donation
protective equipment from Shield 616 for police officers and firefighters.
BACKGROUND
Shield 616 is a non-profit out of Colorado that fund raises and purchases rifle rated ballistic body
armor and donates these items to police and firefighters throughout the nation.
Lino Lakes Volunteers in Public Safety (LLVIPS) is partnering with Shield 616 as the benefactor
of this years “Guns and Hoses” hockey game. As reminder LLVIPS is also registered non-profit
with a board consisting of individuals that volunteer in various roles in the Lino Lakes
community.
LLVIPS and Shield 616 plan to use the Guns and Hoses fundraiser to outfit police and firefighters
with rifle rated ballistic armor for agencies participating in the Guns and Hoses fundraiser. At this
point, they believe they have received enough donation to outfit every police and firefighter that
will play in the hockey game on February 25th as well as start to outfit other police and firefighters
from agencies that have players skating in the game.
There are three police officers and three firefighters from Lino Lakes skating in the Guns and
Hoses game on February 25th. If the City Council accepts the donation from Shield 616 for rifle
rated ballistic armor, these six individuals would be the first to be outfitted with the ballistic armor
package. The ballistic armor package includes Angel Armor RISE 2.0 level IIIa body armor with
rifle rated Truth SNAP plates and Galvion’s level IIIa helmet with upgraded harness system. The
cost of the armor package is $2,300 per package.
Here are the links to Shield 616 and Guns-n-Hoses event for additional details.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council accept the donation of ballistic protective equipment in the amount of
$2,300 each for police officer and firefighters.
ATTACHMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 5A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 22-24, Accepting bids, Awarding a
Construction Contract, Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting council’s consideration to accept bids and award a construction contract for
the Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation Project.
BACKGROUND
On January 10, 2022, the City Council ordered the project and authorized the ad for bid for the
Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation Project located at 7001 Otter Lake Road. This tower was
constructed in 1996. The water tower inspection report identified several structural and coating
issues that need to be addressed. In addition, the exterior and interior dry coatings are over 24
years old and have surpassed their life expectancy. Coatings on water towers are typically
replaced every 20 years, or more frequently to protect the underlying steel surfaces from
corrosion.
This is a 14-16 week project. The tower will be taken out service for a period of time while they
work on the inside of the bowl. The completion date for this project is fall of 2022.
Bids were received on Tuesday, February 8, 2022. A total of 3 bids were received and are
summarized below:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE
BID
Classic Protective Coatings, Inc $1,188,857.80
Viking Industrial Painting $1,428,600.00
TMI Coatings, Inc. $1,637,000.00
The low bid was submitted by Classic Protective Coatings, Inc. in the amount of
$1,188,857.00. The engineer’s estimate was $1,536,000. Funding for the project is through the
Water Operating Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 22-24, Accepting the Bid and Awarding a
Construction Contract for the Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation Project in the amount of
$1,188,857.80 to Classic Protective Coatings, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolutions 22-24
2. Bid Tabulation
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-24
ACCEPTING BASE BID AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WATER TOWER NO. 2 REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Water Tower No. 2
Reconditioning Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement; and
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE
BID
Classic Protective Coatings, Inc. $1,188,857.80
Viking Industrial Painting $1,428,600.00
TMI Coatings, Inc. $1,637,000.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Classic Protective Coatings, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interest of the city to proceed with
Base Bid,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
Classic Protective Coatings, Inc., in the amount of $1,188,857.80 by the name of the City
of Lino Lakes for the Base Bid construction of the Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation
Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidder the Bid
Bonds made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
PROJECT:
OWNER:
City of Lino Lakes
WSB PROJECT NO.:
019414-000
Bids Opened: Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 11:00 am
Contractor Bid Security (5%) Total Bid
1 Classic Protective Coatings, Inc. X $1,188,857.80
2 Viking Industrial Painting X $1,428,600.00
3 TMI Coatings, Inc. X $1,637,000.00
Denotes corrected figure
Greg Johnson, PE Director of Water/Wastewater
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on February 8, 2022.
Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation
K:\019414-000\Admin\Construction Admin\Bidding\019414-000 Bid Tab Summary 020822
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates
i. Consider Resolution No. 22-16 Approving PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat
ii. Consider Resolution No. 22-17 Approving Development
Agreement
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
REVIEW DEADLINE:
Complete Application Date: December 16, 2021
60-Day Review Deadline: February 14, 2022
60-Day Extension Deadline: April 15, 2022
Environmental Board Meeting: January 4, 2022
Park Board Meeting: N/A
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 12, 2022
City Council Work Session: February 7, 2022
City Council Meeting: February 14, 2022
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Lino Lakes 72, LLC, is final platting a 4.5 acre parcel for the purpose of
constructing a 72 unit, 55+ age restricted independent senior housing building called
NorthPointe Garden Estates. It is important to note this is not an assisted-living or senior care
facility. This is an age-restricted multi-family building for seniors. The name of the final plat
is NorthPointe 8th Addition.
The Land Use Application is for the following:
• PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
o Outlot A, NorthPointe 5th Addition to Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 8th Addition
• Site & Building Plan Review
o Independent senior housing building
This staff report is based on the following information:
2
• INH Project Description
• ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021
• Final Plat for NorthPointe 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received December
13, 2021
• Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson McCain
dated December 10, 2021
• Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021
• Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23, 2021
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10, 2021
• Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company,
Inc. dated September 8, 2021
• Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions dated December 13,
2021
• Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. dated January 5,
2022
ANALYSIS
History
The subject site is legally described as Outlot A, NorthPointe 5th Addition and is part of the
NorthPointe residential housing development. Per the 2014 Council Resolution No. 14-21
approving the entire NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, this outlot is
required to be developed as an age restricted (55+) multiple family dwelling consistent with the
regulations of the R-4, High Density Residential District with underground parking for 50% of
the required stalls and at a density of 20 to 25 dwelling units per acre. Future development of
this outlot shall require a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, Development Contract and Site Plan
Review. The Developer shall record against the outlot a declaration or other document stating
these requirements.
Proposed Project
Per the Applicant’s Project Description, the improvements will consist of a 3 story 72 unit
building, constructed over a one story at-grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling
a 4 story building. The project will be constructed out of wood framing with the use of varying
pitched roofs to give architectural appeal to the area. The use of varying styles of stone/brick
help the building meet the 33% material requirements, while giving an aesthetic feel to the
façade. Varying siding and decorative elements make up the rest of the building design.
Multiple amenity spaces are incorporated within the building enhancing the overall experience
for the residents of this project. Featured amenities will include: On-site Management Office,
Community Room, Fitness Center, Mail and Package Lockers, Woodshop, Game Room and
Salon. A variety of floor plans will include One Bedroom, One Bedroom + Den, Two
Bedroom and Two Bedroom + Den options for residents to select.
A tentative 15 month construction schedule is May/June 2022 start and August 2023
completion and occupancy.
3
Existing Site Conditions
Per the December 10, 2021 Stormwater Management Plan, the 4.5 acre site is bounded on the
north by wetland, on the east by Interstate 35E, on the south by agricultural property, and on
the west by Chestnut Street. The site was previously partially graded as part of the overall
mass grading for the NorthPointe master plan of development. As part of the master plan of
development, two wet sedimentation basins were constructed on or adjacent to the site to
provide rate control and water quality treatment for the proposed site.
The NorthPointe residential development consists of 216 single family detached homes.
Zoning and Land Use
In 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 02-14 rezoning the entire NorthPointe
development including this outlot from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development.
Current Zoning PUD, Planned Unit Development
Current Land Use Vacant Residential
Future Land Use per CP Medium Density Residential
Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025
Density
Density calculations are based on the entire NorthPointe residential development. The
following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density.
Gross Area (acres) 94.09
Wetlands (9.21)
Public Parks & Open Space (5.28)
Arterial ROW (0.26)
Other (Floodplain) (3.14)
Other (Wetland Buffer-Conservation Easement Area) (5.72)
Net Area (acres) 70.48
# of Units 299
Gross Density (units/acre) 3.18
Net Density (units/acre) 4.24
4
The 299 housing units consists of the 215 existing NorthPointe single family homes, 1 existing
house at 2162 Cedar Street, 11 future single homes and the proposed 72 unit independent senior
building.
The NorthPointe residential development was approved in 2014 under the land use control of
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The development was guided medium density residential and
required 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre. The developer wanted to build single family detached homes
and in order to meet density requirement, this outlot was created and reserved for the purpose
of constructing a higher density, age restricted, multi-family building.
Under today’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the entire development is still guided medium
density residential which requires 4.0 to 6.0 units per net acre.
The proposed net density of the entire development is 4.24 units per net acre which is
consistent with the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan and NorthPointe PUD Development
Stage Plan guided land use and density.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future 2040
Land Use
North PUD, Planned Unit
Development NorthPointe Park Park & Open Space
South R, Rural Agricultural Low Density
Residential
East
I-35E and R-1,
Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential
Low Density
Residential
West PUD, Planned Unit
Development
Open Space, Wetland
& Single Family
Residential
Open Space &
Single Family
Residential
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
The PUD Final Plan/Final Plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for medium density
development & the NorthPointe PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat. The
development also conforms with the zoning code requirements for R-4, High Density
Residential District as detailed below.
Blocks and Lots
The NorthPointe preliminary plat was approved in March 2014. The final plat for Outlot A,
NorthPointe 5th Addition was approved in April 2017. This outlot is being re-platted for this
project as Lot 1, Block 1, NorthPointe 8th Addition.
5
Parcel Acres Purpose
Lot 1, Block 1 4.5 Independent Senior Housing Building
Streets and Alleys
No new streets are required for the independent senior housing building. Driveway
ingress/egress will be from Chestnut Street, a local road. The existing temporary cul de sac
will remain for emergency vehicle turnaround. This cul de sac will be removed in the future
when Chestnut Street extends to the south.
No additional street right-of-way is required.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along the lot
lines. A minimum 10 ft. wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated
wetland and stormwater pond facility and is provided on the final plat.
A separate trail easement for the existing trail on the northwest end of the lot has been
recorded.
Public Land Dedication
The City will collect a cash fee of $227,520 in lieu of land dedication for NorthPointe 8th
Addition. The independent senior housing building is within the NorthPointe park service area
and no additional park land dedication is required.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
# Units = 72
Residential Park Dedication Fee = $3,160
TOTAL = $227,520
Site and Building Plan Review
Site Plan
The applicant is proposing to construct a 3 story, 72 unit building, constructed over a one story
at-grade parking garage (with 1:1 stalls per unit), totaling a 4 story building. The site plan
includes a paved parking lot, detached garage, senior building, landscaped courtyard with fire
pit and gazebo, dog park area, sidewalk connection to existing trail, wetland and stormwater
pond open space. The building footprint is 36,677 sf.
The January 12, 2022 Planning & Zoning staff report details the projects compliance with
zoning setbacks, building design criteria, height, lighting and parking requirements. Overall,
6
the proposed independent senior housing building meets ordinance and performance standard
requirements unless otherwise noted.
Setbacks
The R-4, High Density Residential District zoning requirements apply to this project. The Site
Plan Review Worksheet details setback requirements. The principal building 30 ft. setback is
met along the Chestnut Street front lot line. The 20 ft. north and south side yard setbacks are
also met.
Staff notes the detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street and shall
be omitted.
PUD Flexibility
The required building setback along an arterial street (I-35E) is 40 ft. The applicant is
requesting PUD flexibility to reduce this setback from 40 ft. to 20 ft. to allow for the proposed
building footprint and development of the courtyard amenities. The building will be 100-110
ft. from the pavement of the southbound lane of I-35E and 330 ft. from the nearest house in
NorthPointe. Shifting the building east also provides additional separation from the
NorthPointe single family detached homes.
Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials
Per City Code Section 1007.043(2), General Building and Use Provisions:
(c) Multiple Family Apartments Construction Standards:
1. The exterior of multiple family dwelling structures shall include a variation in
building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated
into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance.
In addition, multiple family dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements:
a. A minimum of thirty-three (33) percent of the combined area of all building
exterior walls of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco, and/or natural or
artificial stone.
b. For the purposes of this section, the area of the building facade shall not
include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas.
Exterior materials consist of stone veneer, brick veneer, LP lap siding and asphalt shingles.
The building includes decorative trim board, stone band, stone cap, 4” window trim, horizontal
LP lap siding, vertical board and batten and decorative gable corbels. This variety of materials
and accents provide visual interest, articulation and depth to the building. The color palette
consists of greys (carbon, driftwood gray), black, white and browns (java and wood grain
siding).
7
The building has 41% masonry stone and brick. The materials and percentages are compliant
with performance standards.
Per City Code Section 1007.095 R-4, High Density Residential District:
(1) Height Regulation. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty-
five (45) feet in height—or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4)
stories or forty-five (45) feet—except as allowed by §1007.043 (3).
The R-4 zoning district allows for 4 story multiple dwelling buildings. The proposed senior
building is 4 stories (52 ft. measured to the roof midpoint) and is compliant with performance
standards.
Trash/recycling enclosure and mechanical equipment are located inside the building in the
garage level.
The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression.
The following chart is a summary of the bedroom and unit mix:
# of Bedrooms # of Units
One bedroom = 3
One bedroom with den = 10
Two bedrooms = 47
Two bedrooms with den = 12
TOTAL = 72
City Code Section 1007.095(5) states the minimum livable floor area for each multiple family
dwelling unit shall be 700 sf plus 100 ft. additional square feet for each bedroom. This would
require the one bedroom units to be a minimum 800 sf and the two bedroom units to be a
minimum of 900 sf. Sheets A102-A104 provides a summary chart of the unit sizes ranging
from 792 sf to 1,284 sf. The A.1 one bedroom units are less than 800 sf and shall be revised.
Outdoor Lighting
Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or
0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. The site photometric plan shows 5 light poles in the
parking lot that are 25 ft. tall with downlit and cutoff light fixtures.
The foot candle measurements, light poles and fixtures meet ordinance requirements.
Off-Street Parking Requirements
Per City Code Section 1007.044(6),
(d) Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking
space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2)
8
space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City
Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated.
In addition to the City ordinance, PUD Resolution No. 14-21 requires 50% of the parking stalls
to be underground.
The 72 unit senior building requires 72 parking spaces with at least 36 underground. Sheet C3,
Site Plan indicates 62 surface stalls, 2 handicap surface stalls and 72 interior (underground) for
a total of 136 parking spaces. The 9 stall detached garage will be omitted.
Five (5) handicap parking stalls are required per ADA for parking facilities with 101-150
parking stalls. The proposed development has 2 handicap surface stalls and 2 handicap interior
stalls for a total of four (4). It was directed at February 7, 2022 Council Work Session to
provide more handicap surface parking stalls because this is a senior building. As part of the
PUD, two (2) additional handicap surface parking stalls are required. This would bring the
total to six (6) handicap parking stalls (4 surface + 2 interior).
Grading Plan and Stormwater Management
Per the Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10 2021,
the drainage boundary being considered is 113.810 acres, which includes all drainage from the
overall NorthPointe development. Drainage areas affected by the proposed construction
include the stormwater pond 300P located in the northern portion of the site, the stormwater
pond 200P just outside the west‐northwest property boundary (Pond 200P), Catchment 33S and
12S to Wetland 1P, which also receives stormwater from the outlets of Ponds 200P and 300P,
and Catchment 11S to Ditch 3P, which is the receiving body for Wetland 1P. The proposed
site will only affect drainage to these areas. The majority of the site flows to Ponds 200P and
300P. The remaining stormwater drains between Ponds 200P and 300P to Wetland 1P or to
Ditch 3P. All stormwater, ultimately flows to Ditch 3P.
The proposed construction will maintain the drainage areas provided in the overall NorthPointe
master development plan to the maximum extent possible. The proposed apartment lot will
meet the overall stormwater treatment requirements from the MPCA Construction Stormwater
Permit. Adequate water quality treatment and rate control is provided by the existing regional
ponds, wetlands, and ditches. All storm sewers have been sized to accommodate a 10‐year
storm at a minimum. The proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the
existing stormwater infrastructure originally planned for the development of the site.
The City Engineer and RCWD have reviewed the stormwater management plan.
Public Utilities
The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8” PVC
sanitary sewer and an 8” DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street.
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards
Per the January 4, 2022 Environmental Board staff report:
9
The Tree Inventory identifies 55 trees of which 22 will be preserved and 33 will be removed.
Of the 33 removals, 27 trees are in Basic Use Area and non-environmentally sensitive areas.
These removals will not require mitigation trees.
The other 6 removals are in Basic Use Area and Natural Resource Protected Area. Three (3) of
these trees are undesirable, due to being in poor condition or being an invasive species and do
not require mitigation. The other 3 trees require mitigation at the rate of 1 mitigation tree per 2
trees removed, resulting in 2 mitigation trees being required for the project.
Mitigation trees have been credited through open space plantings. Preservation and mitigation
standards have been met.
Open Areas Landscape Standards
Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq. ft.
109,831 sq. ft. of open space requires: 55 large trees
165 large shrubs
Provided: 61 large trees or large tree equivalents
115 large shrubs or large shrub equivalents
Open areas landscape standards have not been met. 50 additional shrubs will be needed in
open space areas.
Buffer and Screen Standards
Buffer and/or screen will be required along the east lot line. The retaining wall will satisfy part
of the requirements. Planting an additional 4 trees and 5 large shrubs will satisfy the
requirements. Additional coniferous trees are required along the west lot line.
Buffers and screens as planned do not meet the requirements.
Canopy Cover
Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage.
Vehicular hardscape planned: 37,779 sq. ft.
Canopy cover requirement: 15,112 sq. ft.
Canopy cover provided: 15,425 sq. ft.
Canopy cover requirements have been met.
Foundation Landscaping
Two (2) large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building abutting a
public or private street. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building.
10
The foundation plantings required for the Chestnut Street southwest side:
Required: 2 large trees 7 large shrubs
Provided: 4 large tree equivalents 23 large shrub equivalents
The foundation plantings required for the I-35E east side:
Required: 6 large trees 19 large shrubs
Provided: 2 large tree equivalents 14 large shrubs equivalents
Four (4) large trees and 5 large shrubs should be planted east of the retaining wall along the
northeast section of building that runs parallel with the lot line.
The foundation landscape requirements have not been met for the east building face.
Sod and Ground Cover Standards
All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a
minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be
provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or
wetlands.
The plan indicates sod in the common area in the center of the building, along the east and west
building faces, and along the south edge of the parking lot and access road. Due to the area
east of the retaining wall being higher in elevation, on sandy soil, and being quite exposed, a
dry prairie mix should be better suited than the wet meadow mix proposed.
Boulevard Trees
Boulevard trees are required for multi-family developments at a rate of 1 tree per 70 linear feet.
The front lot line along Chestnut Street is 173 lf which would require 2 boulevard trees. Five
(5) boulevard trees are proposed and this requirement has been met.
Signage
Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument and wall signs.
Sign permit applications are required for all temporary signs as well.
Impervious Surface Coverage
The R-4 zoning district states the impervious surface of the property shall not exceed 65%.
Plan Sheet C3, Site Plan notes 44% hard/impervious surface. Impervious surface requirements
are met.
Traffic Study
A Traffic Impact Study was completed in November 2013 by Westwood Professional Services
as part of the overall NorthPointe residential development and it included analysis for an 85
11
unit senior apartment. This report detailed compliance with City ordinance level of service
requirements for the entire development.
A Traffic Analysis Memorandum was completed on December 13, 2021 by S2 Traffic
Solutions as an update to the 2013 study reflecting the proposed 72 unit senior building. The
updated analysis takes into account the COVID-19 pandemic and applies a 1.4% growth factor.
Trip Generation
Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) standards and traffic counts collected by
Quality Counts on December 7, 2021, the 72 unit senior building is forecasted to generate
approximately 233 daily trips with 15 peak hour AM trips (7:15-8:15am) and 18 peak hour PM
trips (4:15-5:15pm).
It is important to note that an age-restricted 55+ independent senior housing building will
generate less trips than a multi-family housing building.
Existing Arterial and Collector Roadway AADT & Capacity
Roadway Functional
Class
AADT1
(Year)
Daily Road
Capacity
Main St (CSAH 14) Minor Arterial 16,500 (2018) 32,000
20th Ave S (CSAH 54) Minor Arterial 3,000-6,100
(2018) 15,000
Birch St (CSAH 34) Major Collector 3,150 (2018) 15,000
Ash St (CR J) Minor Arterial 10,500 (2014) 15,000
1Annual Average Daily Traffic
The AADT on the existing arterial and collector roadways are less than daily road capacity.
Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions and driver delay (measured
in seconds) of an intersection. Operations are given letter designations from “A” (best
operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions).
City Code Section 1007.020, Site Plan Review and Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature
Subdivision establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states
that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than
12
one grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or
F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better.
2024 No-Build Overall LOS 2024 Build Overall LOS
Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
20th Ave S & Main St C C C C
20th Ave S & W Cedar St A A A A
20th Ave S & Red Oak Ln A A A A
20th Ave S & Birch St A A A A
20th Ave S & Ash St B B B C
The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the
subdivision is not considered premature and the traffic generated by the senior building is
within the capabilities of the City’s road system.
NorthPointe Road System
Red Oak Lane, Cypress Street and 21st Avenue South are minor collector roads within the
NorthPointe residential development. Minor collector roads are designed and intended to
handle 1,000-3,000 daily trips. Per the original 2013 NorthPointe Traffic Study, the entire
NorthPointe residential development (single family homes and senior apartment) was projected
to have 313 housing units and generate approximately 2,534 daily trips. This is well within the
capacity of the entire NorthPointe road system. The actual housing unit count of 299 is less
than the original 313.
In December 2019, a Traffic Impact Study completed for Nadeau Acres collected existing daily
traffic counts on Red Oak Lane east of 20th Avenue S. at 1,000 ADT. The City also collected
daily traffic counts in August 2021 on Red Oak Lane east of 20th Ave S. at 987 ADT. These
trip counts are consistent and are low for a minor collector road.
Figure 6 of the 2021 Traffic Analysis completed for NorthPointe Garden Estates indicates 10
additional AM peak trips and 8 additional PM peak trips on Red Oak Lane. As noted, level of
service is not impacted.
The 18 existing homes on Chestnut Street generate approximately 180 daily trips. The local
road has capacity for 1,000 daily trips. Chestnut Street has capacity for an additional 233 daily
trips generated by the senior housing building.
It should also be noted that Chestnut Street, 21st Avenue S., Cypress St. and Red Oak Lane all
have sidewalks that provide safe pedestrian corridors in the area. A trail from Chestnut Street
extends to NorthPointe Park.
13
Further, with future development of the property south of NorthPointe, Cypress Street and
Chestnut Street will extend south and Birch Street will extend east providing additional ingress
and egress roads to the development.
Conclusion
The traffic study results are similar and marginally better than predicted in the original analysis.
The proposed development has appropriate access to the site and to the surrounding roadway
network. The traffic operational analysis indicates there is available capacity on the roadways
surrounding the site to accommodate site-generated traffic.
The roadway network has capacity for an additional 233 daily trips generated by the senior
housing building.
Staff will re-evaluate resident concerns regarding current speeding and traffic issues on Red
Oak Lane and Dogwood Court unrelated to the NorthPointe Garden Estates project.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
The site is within the revised 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary.
The project is consistent with Land Use Scenario 1 and 2 for medium density residential
development. No further environmental review is required.
Wetlands
A wetland delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on December
3, 2013 for the entire NorthPointe development. A WCA Notice of Decision (NOD) was
issued by RCWD on April 11, 2014. The NOD is only valid for 5 years so a new wetland
delineation report was completed by Kjolhaug on September 8, 2021 for the one (1) existing
wetland on the senior housing building site. A new WCA NOD approving the wetland
delineation was issued by RCWD on October 21, 2021.
One 0.085 acre wetland area was delineated on the south end the site. The wetland is a Type
3/2 (PEMC/A) shallow marsh and wet meadow wetland. The wetland area (0.085 acre) is
slightly smaller than the original approved wetland area (0.12 acre).
No impacts to this wetland are proposed.
The wetland is part of the Wetland Management Corridor and a conservation easement
currently exists over the wetland as part of the original NorthPointe development. The
easement area may be amended to allow for design of the parking lot with approval from
RCWD. The total area of the easement would remain the same.
A minimum 10 ft. wide drainage and utility easement is required and is provided above the
delineated wetland.
Shoreland District
14
The site is not within a Shoreland District.
Floodplain
The 2015 FEMA floodplain map indicates Zone A floodplain along the west edge of the site.
However, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was obtained on December 21, 2016 for the entire
NorthPointe development. The floodplain boundary was revised and is no longer on the site.
Noise Study
A Traffic Noise Assessment for NorthPointe Garden Estates was completed on January 5, 2022
by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The report evaluated I-35E noise compared to daytime and
nighttime noise standards. Noise standards are met under the following conditions:
1. The building shall be constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level
attenuation is at least 30 dB(A).
2. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control.
3. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows.
4. Per page 8 of the Traffic Noise Assessment, exterior wall construction shall consist of:
a. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior wall.
i. This material will be 7/16” thick and a wood fiber material.
b. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation.
c. The inside finish shall be 5/8” gypsum board.
d. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354” and be of a wood fibrous material.
e. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970” and be of a wood
fibrous material.
Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments
MNDOT
MNDOT provided comments on January 26, 2022. They noted the need for possible noise
mitigation and a drainage permit. Noise mitigation has been addressed with building
construction materials as previously noted. The applicant shall apply for a drainage permit.
Public Safety Comments
The Fire Division reviewed the plans and notes the following:
1. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the building.
a. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to provide emergency
vehicle access.
2. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be added.
3. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance stretchers.
The Police Division reviewed the plans and did not identify any public safety concerns that
should be addressed.
15
Environmental Board
The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their January 4, 2022 meeting.
The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the final plat and site plan on January 12, 2022. Some
residents expressed concerns regarding possible traffic and noise impacts. The Board
recommended approval with a 4-0 vote.
City Attorney
The City Attorney has reviewed the title commitment and final plat. The title commitment
shall be updated and list Lino Lakes 72, LLC as the proposed insured party.
Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)
RCWD issued a CAPROC January 26, 2022.
Agreements
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private stormwater
management facilities is required.
Development Agreement
A Development Agreement will be drafted by the City as it relates to the NorthPointe 8th
Addition final plat.
Site Improvement Performance Agreement
A Site Improvement Performance Agreement may be required by the City as is relates to the
NorthPointe Garden Estates development or the required securities may be collected with the
Development Agreement.
Declaration of Covenants
As required by Resolution No. 14-21, the developer shall record against the property an age-
restriction declaration. The applicant has submitted a declaration and it is under review by the
City Attorney.
16
Comprehensive Plan
Resource Management System
The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported
by the construction of stormwater management BMP’s such as curb, gutter, and stormwater
pond.
Land Use Plan
The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for medium density residential. The proposed
independent senior housing building is consistent with residential density land use.
Housing Plan
The goals and policies of Housing Plan are supported by the independent senior housing
building.
Transportation Plan
Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and
to reduce unnecessary traffic. The arterial, collector and local roads have capacity to handle the
traffic volume of the independent senior housing building. Sidewalks and trails are in place to
provide safe pedestrian corridors.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan
The new independent senior housing building will be municipally served by an 8” PVC
sanitary sewer and an 8” DIP watermain located along Chestnut Street. The existing sanitary
sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development.
Findings of Fact
The Findings of Fact for NorthPointe 8th Addition and NorthPointe Garden Estates PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat are detailed in Resolution No. 22-16.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and Boards recommend approval of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat and Development
Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 22-16
2. Final Plat
3. Resolution No. 22-17
4. Development Agreement
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-16
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION
PUD FINAL PLAN/FINAL PLAT
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD
Final Plan/Final Plat hereafter referred to as Development; and
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the proposed Development based on
the following plans and information:
• INH Project Description
• ALTA Survey prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 12, 2021
• Final Plat for NorthPointe 8th Addition prepared by Carlson McCain received
December 13, 2021
• Civil Plan Set, Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Carlson
McCain dated December 10, 2021
• Lighting Plan prepared by Luma Sales Associates dated December 9, 2021
• Architectural Plan Set prepared by Cole Group Architecture dated December 23,
2021
• Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated December 10,
2021
• Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services
Company, Inc. dated September 8, 2021
• Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions dated December
13, 2021
• Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. dated
January 5, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the NorthPointe PUD Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat on March 10, 2014 with Resolution No. 14-21; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the
Development on January 12, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Development is not considered premature and meets the
performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino
Lakes hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
2
1. The final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat subject to
the conditions listed below.
2. The City Attorney has reviewed the status of title/property ownership related to
the final plat and provided comments as noted below.
3. A Development Agreement has been drafted and shall be executed.
4. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat have been fulfilled or
secured by the Development Agreement.
5. All fees, charges and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat have been
paid in full.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following
conditions:
1. The existing conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration may be
amended with approval from RCWD.
2. A Development Agreement and securities related to the final plat are required.
3. A Site Performance Agreement and securities related to NorthPointe Garden
Estates are required or securities shall be collected with the Development
Agreement.
4. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private
stormwater management facilities is required.
5. A Declaration of Covenants detailing age-restriction is required.
6. A temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit are required over the cul-de-sac.
7. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent monument/pylon
and wall signage.
8. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage.
9. PUD, Planned Unit Development flexibility is provided to reduce the principal
and accessory building setback along I-35E from 40ft to 20ft.
10. All parking stalls (surface, interior garage and detached garage) shall be provided
rent free to all tenants.
11. The following noise mitigation standards apply:
a. The building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior
sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A).
b. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control.
c. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows.
d. Exterior wall construction shall consist of the following or comparable
materials:
i. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior
wall.
1. This material will be 7/16” thick and a wood fiber material.
ii. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation.
iii. The inside finish shall be 5/8” gypsum board.
iv. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354” and be of a wood fibrous
material.
v. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970” and be of
a wood fibrous material.
3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to the following
items being addressed prior to release of the mylars or issuance of a building permit:
1. All comments from the City Engineer memo dated January 5, 2022 shall be
addressed.
2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated January 5, 2022
shall be addressed.
3. All comments from the Lino Lakes Fire Division shall be addressed:
a. An emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the north side of the
building.
i. The developer could potentially upgrade the existing trail to
provide emergency vehicle access.
ii. The developer shall consult with Deputy Director of Public Safety-
Fire and City Engineer.
b. An addition fire hydrant along the emergency vehicle access shall be
added.
c. The elevator cars shall be large enough to accommodate ambulance
stretchers.
4. All comments from the MNDOT letter dated January 26, 2022 shall be addressed.
5. All comments from the City Attorney shall be addressed:
a. The title commitment shall be updated.
b. The title commitment shall list Lino Lakes 72, LLC as the proposed
insured party.
6. The applicant shall draft a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities
for the private stormwater maintenance facility.
7. The applicant shall draft a temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit for the cul-
de-sac.
8. The applicant shall draft an amendment to the existing Conservation Easement
and Wetland Buffer Declaration for City review and comment.
a. The documents shall include both RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes as
parties.
b. The exhibit shall provide location of Protected Open Space Area
monument signs.
9. All applicable plan sheets:
a. All plan sheets shall be dated.
b. The detached garage is not allowed in the front yard along Chestnut Street
and shall be relocated or removed.
10. Sheet C3, Site Plan:
a. Setbacks shall be measured from balcony support beams on the north side
of the building.
b. Two (2) additional handicap surface parking stalls shall be added.
c. The detached garage shall be omitted and replaced with landscaping,
screen and buffer.
11. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan:
a. A landscape screen and buffer are required along the west, east and south
lot lines.
4
12. Sheets A102-A104 Floor Plans:
a. The A.1 one bedroom unit is less than 800sf and shall be revised.
13. Sheet A010, Site Plan:
a. The parking calculations shall be revised to reflect City ordinance
requirements.
b. Setback lines
i. The front building setback line shall note 30ft.
ii. The “25 number note” on the north side near the detached garage
shall point to the 20ft setback line.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member ______________________and was duly seconded by Council Member
______________and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITIONENGINEERINGSURVEYINGENVIRONMENTAL
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-17
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the NorthPointe 8th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
with Resolution No. 22-16 on February 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City’s subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution
of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the Development Agreement between Lino Lakes 72, LLC and the City of Lino
Lakes for NorthPointe 8th Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such
agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
and
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NorthPointe 8th Addition
THIS AGREEMENT is made this _____ day of ____________, 2022, by and between the City
of Lino Lakes (“City”), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Lino Lakes 72, LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company (“Developer”).
1. Subdivision. Developer received preliminary plat approval from the City by Resolution No.
14-21 for a plat known as NorthPointe. The proposed NorthPointe 8th Addition
(“Subdivision”) is part of the original plat of NorthPointe. Unless otherwise stated, all terms
and conditions of this Agreement relate to work within the Subdivision.
2. Final Plat Approval. The City’s approval of the final plat of NorthPointe 8th Addition is
contingent upon execution and delivery of this agreement, all required petitions, bonds,
security, and other documents required by the City, and satisfaction of all conditions of
approval required by Resolution No. 22-17. The Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Developer Plans.
a. The Subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following Developer
Plans, original copies of which are on file with the City Engineer. The Developer
Plans may be prepared and revised after entering into this Agreement but must
be approved by the City before commencement of any work. If the plans vary
from the written terms of this Agreement, this Agreement shall control.
b. The Developer Plans as of the date of this Agreement are the NorthPointe
Garden Estates plan set containing sheets C1-C9, L1-L4, and TP1, prepared by
Carlson McCain, dated December 10, 2021.
4. Permits. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and
development approvals and all other required permits from all appropriate Federal,
State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or
construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public
improvements.
5. Developer Improvements. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install the
improvements described in this paragraph, or otherwise required herein to be installed
by Developer, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements,” which
contractor shall be approved by the City in its absolute and sole discretion. The
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 2
Developer Improvements shall be constructed per the City Standard Specifications for
Construction 2022 current version.
The cost of Developer Improvements is as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. All
Developer Improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where
appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The
Developer shall construct and install at the Developer's expense the following
improvements according to the following terms and conditions:
a. Site Grading
i. No grading shall commence until all requirements of the Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD) have been satisfied.
ii. All site grading shall be conducted in accordance with the grading plan as
approved by the City and in accordance with NPDES and RCWD
requirements. The Developer shall perform the work in accordance with
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements.
b. Grading and Erosion Control
i. The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown
on the approved grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a
revised plan is submitted and approved in writing by the City and all
other regulatory agencies.
ii. The street right-of-way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water
drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility
construction. Four inches of topsoil and a City approved seed mix shall be
installed within disturbed areas, and seed mix information shall be
provided to the City.
iii. The Developer shall be responsible for ascertaining that site geotechnical
and groundwater conditions are adequate and conforming with the
grading and site improvement as proposed. The Developer shall provide
testing from an approved testing company.
iv. The Developer’s engineer shall certify in writing, with an as-built survey,
that all grading complies with the approved grading plan prior to issuance
of any building permits.
v. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris within public rights-of-
way and drainage and utility easements resulting from construction by
the Developer, its purchasers, builders and contractors within five (5)
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 3
days after notification by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for
all necessary street and storm sewer maintenance, including street
sweeping, until all home construction is completed, unless otherwise
released by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards
develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on them, including
detour signs if necessary. If and when the streets become impassable,
such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain
a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary
streets.
c. Final street and parking area grading, subbase, gravel base, concrete curb and
gutter, and bituminous base course and wear course shall be furnished and
installed.
d. Sidewalks, trails and lighting shall be installed within 6 months of the bituminous
base course. Extensions may be approved by the City Engineer, due to weather
conditions, upon receipt of a written request in writing by the Developer to the
City. In no case shall such extension extend beyond one year from the date of
installation of bituminous base course.
e. Storm sewers, when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including
all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances, shall be
furnished and installed.
f. Sanitary sewer mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building
services and other appurtenances, shall be furnished and installed.
g. Water mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services,
hydrants, valves and other appurtenances, shall be furnished and installed.
h. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot, block, and outlot corners
and at all other angle points on boundary lines consistent with the final plat.
Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been
completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot
corner irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the
iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the
approved grading plan. Guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark
these irons.
i. Landscaping shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the approved
plans. The landscaping shall be maintained by the Developer until accepted by
the City’s Environmental Coordinator.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 4
Developer shall be responsible for vegetative restoration of ponding areas,
outlots, wetland mitigation areas, and other native planting areas identified on
the plans in accordance with City Standard Specifications for Construction.
Developer shall provide a contract with a qualified firm for the establishment
and maintenance of all open space / native plant areas. Said contract shall cover
a minimum of the 3 year establishment period, from the date of planting.
j. The Developer shall arrange for all gas, telecommunications, cable, internet,
electric, and other necessary private utility services to the Subdivision in
accordance with City Code and State law. The utilities are required to be located
within a joint trench. Street light installations shall be initiated by the Developer
with City Engineer approval. The Developer is solely responsible for the cost of
private utility and internet installation.
k. The Developer shall install mailboxes in accordance with Federal and Postal
Service regulations.
l. The Developer shall install wetland buffer signs per City standard detail plates
prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements
enumerated in Paragraph 6 by June 30, 2023. The Developer may request a reasonable
extension of time from the City. If the extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon
updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the
extended completion date.
7. City Improvements. No City installed improvements are proposed to be constructed for
this subdivision.
8. Record Drawings.
a. Upon project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings, in electronic
format, of all public and private infrastructure improvements, including grading,
sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer facilities, and roads, constructed by
Developer. The files shall be drawn in Anoka County NAD 83 Coordinate system
and provided in both AutoCAD .dwg and Adobe .pdf file formats. The plans shall
include accurate locations, dimensions, elevations, grades, slopes and all other
pertinent information concerning the complete work.
b. The Developer shall submit certified compaction testing results for the site
grading operations that certify that grading work meets pertinent compaction
requirements for the project.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 5
c. A summary of the record plan attribute data for the storm sewer, watermain,
and sanitary sewer structures and pipes shall be submitted in the form of an
Excel Spreadsheet as provided by the City Engineer.
d. No securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted
and accepted by the City Engineer.
9. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Security.
a. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any
and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction
of all Developer Improvements. Concurrent with the execution hereof by the
Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with
the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on
thirty-five (35%) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Improvements
as determined by the City Engineer.
b. Irrevocable Letter of Credit. If an Irrevocable Letter of Credit is utilized, it shall be
for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state that it is
issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and
conditions of this Development Agreement and construction of all required
improvements referenced therein in accordance with the ordinances and
specifications of the City. The letter shall be in a form, and from a bank, as
approved by the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on
any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the
terms and conditions of this agreement. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be
automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future
expiration dates on an annual basis, unless at least sixty (60) days prior to the
expiration date, the Community Development Director and City Engineer, are
notified by certified mail or overnight courier, that the Letter of Credit will not be
extended.
c. Public Improvement Surety Agreement, not applicable
d. Reduction of Security. The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit
or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements
at the time of the requested reduction.
10. Warranty. The Developer warrants all utility work required to be performed by it against
poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two years after its completion and
acceptance by the City. All new streets shall be warranted by the developer for a period
of one year from the time the final inspection of the street is completed and accepted
by the City Council. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality
and disease free for 12 months after planting. Prior to final acceptance of the Developer
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 6
Improvements the City shall require a Surety Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the warranty
provisions of this Agreement. The amount shall be 20 % of the original cost of construction
identify in Schedule B.
11. Dedication. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, at no cost to the City, any
permanent or temporary easements that may be necessary for the construction and
installation of the Developer Improvements. All such easements required by the City
shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City
shall determine.
12. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and
construction required by this Agreement, the public improvements lying within public
rights-of-way and easements shall become City property without further notice or
action unless the improvements are to be deemed private infrastructure.
13. Recording and Release. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development
Agreement shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The
Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development
Agreement with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and
owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1.
14. Escrow for City’s Costs.
a. The Developer agrees to establish a non-interest bearing escrow account with
the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or their designee for
the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the
Subdivision including, but not limited to, the following (See Exhibit B for
breakdown of costs):
i. Planning/ Review
ii. Administration - 3% of Developer [CITY] Improvement Costs
iii. City Engineering and Legal
iv. Street lighting installation (by utility company, developer to initiate)
v. Traffic signing improvements – Installed by the Developer
vi. Boulevard tree planting– Installed by the Developer
vii. Street, storm sewer and pond maintenance
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 7
viii. Property Taxes. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1st,
any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of
this plat shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
b. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the Developer shall make such
additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to
reimburse itself from the Escrow with suitable documentation supporting the
charges.
15. Developer Fees. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall pay
the following fees related to the development of the Subdivision (See Exhibit B for
breakdown of costs):
a. Park Dedication
The Park Dedication Fee for this site is calculated as follows:
72 units x $3,160 per unit = $227,520.00
b. The Developer shall pay 15 months of maintenance and energy costs for street
lights installed within the Subject Property at the rate of $8/month/light. Not
Applicable.
c. GIS Mapping Fees
d. Trunk Sewer Connection Fees
The City established trunk utility connection fees to uniformly distribute the
costs of public trunk sanitary sewer infrastructure. The Trunk Utility Connection
Fee consists of two components; a Trunk Charge and an Availability Charge.
Trunk Charge
The trunk charge shall be paid at the time of subdivision approval or at the time of
hook-up, whichever is first. Residential trunk charges are based on one unit per
dwelling unit AND/OR Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (CII) trunk charges are
based on a factor of 2.92 units per acre.
Sanitary Sewer $1,630.00 Per Unit
Availability Charge
For residential properties, the availability charge shall be paid at the time of
subdivision approval or at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. AND /OR
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 8
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional availability charges shall be paid at the time
of building permit. Fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge
(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES).
Residential uses shall be assigned one unit per dwelling unit unless otherwise
noted by MCES.
City Sewer (CSAC) $1,525.00 Per SAC Unit
Trunk sewer unit charges addressed under this paragraph are in addition to any
SAC charges imposed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. An
estimate of the total charge and the trunk utility credit for developer installed
trunk oversizing is specified in Exhibit B.
e. Trunk Water Connection Fees
The City established trunk utility connection fees to uniformly distribute the
costs of public trunk water infrastructure. The Trunk Utility Connection Fee
consists of two components; a Trunk Charge and an Availability Charge.
Trunk Charge
The trunk charge shall be paid at the time of subdivision approval or at the time of
hook-up, whichever is first. Residential trunk charges are based on one unit per
dwelling unit. AND /OR Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (CII) trunk charges are
based on a factor of 2.92 units per acre.
Water $2,341.00 Per Unit
Availability Charge
For residential properties, the availability charge shall be paid at the time of
subdivision approval or at the time of hook-up, whichever is first. AND /OR
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional availability charges shall be paid at the time
of building permit. Fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge
(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES).
Residential uses shall be assigned one unit per dwelling unit unless otherwise
noted by MCES.
City Water (CWAC) $1,473.00 Per SAC Unit
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 9
An estimate of the total charge and the trunk utility credit for developer installed
trunk oversizing is specified in Exhibit B.
f. Surface Water Management Area Charges
The City established a trunk area charge to uniformly distribute the costs of
public trunk surface water infrastructure and water quality improvements. The
Surface Water Management Charge shall be based on developable acreage, in
the amount specified in Exhibit B. The charge shall be paid at the time of
subdivision approval.
16. Assessment of Charges and Waiver of Rights.
a. In consideration of the construction of City Improvements listed in Section 7 and
/or provision of sewer, water and storm water services, the Developer agrees
that the costs of City Improvements together with Trunk Sewer Unit Charge,
Trunk Water Unit Charge and the Surface Water Management Area Charge
(collectively, “the Charges”) may be assessed against the Subdivision parcels.
The Developer hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections
to the special assessments, including notice and hearing requirements, any claim
that the assessments exceed the benefit to the properties, and any right to
appeal.
b. Unless the Developer pays the entire balance owed for the Charges
contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall
provide to the City a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit in an amount
equal to 35% of the total assessments for the Charges as estimated by the City
Engineer (see Exhibit B). The letter of credit shall be in a form, and from a bank,
as approved by the City. The letter of credit or cash escrow may be used by the
City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments. The cash
escrow or letter of credit shall remain in place throughout the term of the special
assessments. The letter of credit may not be terminated without the City’s
written consent.
c. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees that within 30 days after the
date of sale of a lot, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, at its own
cost and expense, shall pay the entire unpaid charges assessed or to be assessed
under this Agreement against such property.
d. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been
levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum
of cash equal to 120% of the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for
such Charges that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the
City shall issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 10
Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to
the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus
arising from the payment based upon such estimate.
e. Acceleration of Special Assessments upon Default. In the event the Developer
violates any of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein, violates any
ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or
other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat or development, or
fails to pay when due any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant
to this agreement, or any interest thereon, the City at its option, in addition to its
rights and remedies hereunder, after 10 days written notice to the Developer,
may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or
levied pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City
may seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the
security provided herein. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the
outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest the City
may certify such outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 429.061, subdivision 3, for collection the
following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the
Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then
estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable
attorney's fees, and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if
more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. In addition to any other
rights and remedies upon Developer’s default, the City may refuse to issue
building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for any property within the
Subdivision until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction
of the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by
the City in the enforcement of this agreement, or any portion thereof, including
court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees, if the City prevails in
any enforcement action.
17. Building Permits. No building permits shall be issued until:
a. Site grading, certified compaction testing and approved by the City.
b. Execution of this agreement and receipt of all securities required herein, and
review and approval of building permit application by the Building Official.
18. Special Provisions. Not applicable.
19. Hours of Construction Activity.
All construction activity shall be limited to the hours as follows:
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 11
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed
20. Insurance. Developer or its general contractor shall take out and maintain until one
year after the City accepted the Developer Improvements, public liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property
damage which may arise out of the Developer's or general contractor’s work, as the
case may be, or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed
by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred
Thousand and no/100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and Two Million and no/100
($2,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less
than One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a
combination single limit policy of Two Million and no/100 ($2,000,000.00) Dollars or
more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional
insured on the policy, and the Developer or its general contractor shall file with the City
a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall
provide that the City must be given ten days advance written notice of the cancellation
of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the
required notice.
21. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to
be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the
Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City,
including but not limited to attorney and engineering fees, provided the Developer is
first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This
Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to
seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work,
the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy the cost in whole or in part as a
special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of
hearing and hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429.
22. General.
a. Binding Effect
The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and
shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and
shall be deemed covenants running with the land, unless otherwise released
pursuant to section 14 of this Agreement.
b. Validity.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 12
If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this
agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of
the Development Agreement.
c. Notices
Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or
demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to or on the other
party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally, or mailed by United
States mail to the addresses below, or sent by email to the email address below.
Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally
or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above or when emailed.
The addresses of the parties are as set forth until changed by notice given as
above.
James Illies, VP
INH Property Management, Inc.
175 7th Avenue South
Waite Park, MN 56387
jimjr@inhproperties.com
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
mgrochala@linolakes.us
23. Land Use Controls - Planned Unit Development.
NorthPointe, which includes the Subdivision, is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as
approved by the City Council by Ordinance No. 02-14 and Resolution No. 14-21.
a. The existing conservation easement and wetland buffer declaration may be
amended with approval from RCWD.
b. A Development Agreement and securities related to the final plat are required.
c. A Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities related to the private
stormwater management facilities is required.
d. A temporary cul-de-sac easement and exhibit are required over the cul-de-sac.
e. Separate sign permit applications are required for all permanent
monument/pylon and wall signage.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 13
f. Separate sign permit applications are required for all temporary signage.
g. Planned Unit Development, PUD flexibility is provided to reduce the principal
and accessory building setback along I-35E from 40ft to 20ft.
h. All parking stalls (surface, interior garage and detached garage) shall be provided
rent free to all tenants.
i. The following noise mitigation standards apply:
i. The building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior
sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A).
ii. All housing units shall provide year-round climate control.
iii. STC 30 windows shall be used for all windows.
iv. Exterior wall construction shall consist of:
1. APA rated sheathing located on the exterior side of the exterior
wall. This material will be 7/16” thick and a wood fiber material.
2. Exterior wall shall be 2x6 studs with R-21 batt insulation.
3. The inside finish shall be 5/8” gypsum board.
4. Lap siding shall have a thickness of .354” and be of a wood fibrous
material.
5. Trim around the windows shall have a thickness of .970” and be of
a wood fibrous material.
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have caused this Development Agreement to be
executed in their respective corporate names by their duly authorized officers, all as of the date and
year first written above.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
By _________________________
Mayor
ATTEST
By _________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2022,
by Rob Rafferty as Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2022,
by Julianne Bartell as City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 15
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 16
Execution page of the Developer to the Development Agreement, dated as of the date and year
first written above.
DEVELOPER
By ______________________
Its ______________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF __________ )
On this _______ day of _______________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared ____________, __________________ of
___________________. (Developer), who executed the foregoing instrument.
______________________________
Notary Public
This instrument was drafted by:
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 17
CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION
_____________________________, the holder of a mortgage dated ___________________, filed
for record with the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, on _________________, as
Document No. _____________________, hereby consents to the recording of this Development
Agreement and agrees that its rights in the property affected by the Development Agreement
shall be subordinated thereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, __________________, has caused this Consent and Subordination to
be executed this _____ day of ______________, 2022.
______________________________________
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF __________ )
On this _______ day of _______________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared _______________________, who executed the foregoing
instrument.
______________________________
Notary Public
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 18
EXHIBIT A
Final Plat
NORTHPOINTE 8TH ADDITIONENGINEERINGSURVEYINGENVIRONMENTAL
NorthPointe 8th Addition
Development Agreement
February 14, 2022
page 19
EXHIBIT B
Securities, Escrows & Fees
2/11/2022
EXHIBIT B
Securities, Escrows & Fees
PROJECT: NorthPointe 8th Addition NUMBER OF REU's:72
APPLICANT: INH Property Management, Inc.NO. OF LOT FRONTAGES 0
AREA (ACRES):4.5
IMPROVEMENTS COST
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT COSTS (Private)
SITE GRADING $231,550
EROSION CONTROL $8,800
LANDSCAPING $94,835
PARKING LOT $189,600
STORM SEWER CONST.$95,439
SANITARY SEWER CONST.$21,585
WATERMAIN CONST.$35,925
LIGHTING $20,000
Total $697,734
Letter of Credit Amount X 35%$244,207
ESCROW for CITY'S COSTS
PLANNING/ REVIEW $1,500
ADMINISTRATION $20,940
ENGINEER PLAN REVIEW $2,500
ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $13,955
PROJECT FINAL DOCUMENTS & CITY ENGINEER $5,500
STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION $0
STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE $1,500
PROPERTY TAXES $0
TRAFFIC AND SIGNING IMPROVEMENTS $0
BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $0
Total $45,895
DEVELOPMENT FEES
PARK DEDICATION $227,520
PARK DEDICATION CREDIT $0
Subtotal Park Dedication Fee $227,520
AUAR $0
GIS MAPPING FEE $6,480
STREET LIGHTING OPERATION $0
Total $234,000
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$117,360
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $109,800
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER CREDIT $0
TRUNK WATERMAIN
TRUNK CHARGE PER (ACRE OR UNIT)$168,552
AVAILABILITY CHARGE PER SAC UNIT $106,056
TRUNK WATERMAIN CREDIT $0
TOTAL TRUNK SEWER & WATER FEES $501,768
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT $44,987
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CREDIT $0
TOTAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES $44,987
Total $546,755
SUMMARY OF SECURITIES, ESCROW & FEES
SECURITY: DEVELOPER IMP'MENT COSTS $244,207
ESCROW FOR CITY COSTS $45,895
DEVELOPMENT FEES $234,000
SECURITY CASH: TRUNK FEES $546,755
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project
i.Consider Resolution No. 22-20, Accepting bids, Awarding
a Construction Contract
ii.Consider Resolution No. 22-21, Approving Construction
Services Contract with WSB & Associates
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council’s consideration to accept bids, award a construction contract, and
approve a construction services contract for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 2021, the City Council ordered the project and authorized the advertisement for
bid for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project. The proposed 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project
includes:
Base Bid:
Mill and overlay, spot curb and gutter and storm sewer repairs, water system repairs:
•West Shadow Lake Drive from Birch Street to Fox Road
•Fox Road from West Shadow Lake Drive to the cul-de-sac
•Fox Circle from Fox Road to the cul-de-sac
•White Owl Drive from Fox Road to West Shadow Lake Drive
•River Birch Place from West Shadow Lake Drive to the cul-de-sac
•Ironwood Circle from West Shadow Lake Drive to the cul-de-sac
•Hickory Place from West Shadow Lake Drive to the cul-de-sac
•Painted Turtle Road from West Shadow Lake Drive to Hawthorn Road
•Hawthorn Road from Ware Road to Painted Turtle Road
The project included two alternative bids, in the event bid prices permitted additional work within
budget:
Alternate No. 1 - Bituminous Overlay Rondeau Lake Road W and 81st Street W
Alternate No. 2 - Bituminous Overlay Rondeau Lake Road E
Bids were received on Tuesday, February 8, 2022. A total of 7 bids were received and are
summarized below:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL
BASE BID
TOTAL
BASE BID +
ALT 1
TOTAL
BASE BID +
ALT 2
TOTAL
(BASE BID +
ALT 1 + ALT 2)
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc $762,425.39 $211,188.50 $239,490.50 $1,213,104.39
Valley Paving, Inc. $770,310.18 $213,007.57 $239,767.15 $1,223,084.90
Meyer Contracting, Inc. $791,821.85 $220,512.68 $230,785.31 $1,243,119.84
Northwest Asphalt $815,891.84 $242,190.76 $264,462.12 $1,322,544.72
Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $826,662.75 $197,379.00 $221,614.00 $1,245,655.75
North Valley, Inc. $842,791.51 $196,520.35 $221,577.59 $1,260,899.45
Park Construction Co. $887,593.40 $226,448.60 $250,869.60 $1,364,911.60
The low bid was submitted by T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $1,213,104.39 for
the base bid and the bid alternates. Alternates 1 & 2, in the amounts of $211,188.50 and
$239,490.50 respectively, are under the available budget and are being recommended for
award.
The total estimated project cost for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project, including soft costs
and contingencies, is $1,400,000. The project will be funded through Pavement Management
funds, State Aid funds, and the Water Operating fund.
The completion date for this project is October 31, 2022.
WSB and Associates has submitted a proposal to complete the construction services for the
2022 Street Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $62,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 22-20, Accepting the Bid and Awarding a
Construction Contract for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $1,213,104.39
to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc., and adoption of Resolution No. 22-21, Approving the Construction
Services Contract with WSB for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project, in the amount of
$62,000.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolutions 22-20 & 22-21
2. Bid Tabulation
3. WSB Proposal
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-20
ACCEPTING BASE BID AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
2022 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the 2022 Street
Rehabilitation Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following
bids were received complying with the advertisement; and
CONTRACTOR TOTAL
BASE BID
TOTAL
BASE BID +
ALT 1
TOTAL
BASE BID +
ALT 2
TOTAL
(BASE BID +
ALT 1 + ALT
2)
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc $762,425.39 $211,188.50 $239,490.50 $1,213,104.39
Valley Paving, Inc. $770,310.18 $213,007.57 $239,767.15 $1,223,084.90
Meyer Contracting, Inc. $791,821.85 $220,512.68 $230,785.31 $1,243,119.84
Northwest Asphalt $815,891.84 $242,190.76 $264,462.12 $1,322,544.72
Bituminous Roadways,
Inc. $826,662.75 $197,379.00 $221,614.00 $1,245,655.75
North Valley, Inc. $842,791.51 $196,520.35 $221,577.59 $1,260,899.45
Park Construction Co. $887,593.40 $226,448.60 $250,869.60 $1,364,911.60
WHEREAS, it appears that T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interest of the city to proceed with
Base Bid and Alternates 1 and 2,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cit y Council of the City of Lino Lakes:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with T.A.
Schifsky & Sons, Inc., in the amount of $1,213,104.39 by the name of the City of Lino
Lakes for the Base Bid, Alternate 1, and Alternate 2 construction of the 2022 Street
Rehabilitation Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidder the Bid
Bonds made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-21
APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT
2022 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Council awarding a construction contract to T.A. Schifsky &
Sons, Inc. in the amount of $1,213,104.39, on February 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, WSB and Associates has submitted a proposal to complete the construction
services for the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $62,000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the city to proceed with
the construction oversight and administration,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the
Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with WSB, in the name
of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction services of 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
PROJECT:
S.A.P. SAP 210-107-001
OWNER:
City of Lino Lakes
WSB PROJECT NO.: 019135-000
Bids Opened: Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 10:00 am
Alternate 1 Alternate 2
Contractor
Bid
Security Base Bid
Rondeau Lk Rd W
& 81st St W
Rondeau Lk Rd E
TOTAL BID
1 T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. X $762,425.39 $211,188.50 $239,490.50 $1,213,104.39
2 Valley Paving, Inc. X $770,310.18 $213,007.57 $239,767.15 $1,223,084.90
3 Meyer Contracting, Inc. X $791,821.85 $220,512.68 $230,785.31 $1,243,119.84
4 Northwest X $815,891.84 $242,190.76 $264,462.12 $1,322,544.72
5 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. X $826,662.75 $197,379.00 $221,614.00 $1,245,655.75
6 North Valley, Inc. X $842,791.51 $196,520.35 $221,577.59 $1,260,889.45
7 Park Construction Company X $887,593.40 $226,448.60 $250,869.60 $1,364,911.60
Engineer's Opinion of Cost $780,326.00 $207,824.00 $233,978.00 $1,222,128.00
Denotes corrected figure
Diane Hankee, PE Sr. Project Manager
BID TABULATION SUMMARY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on February 8, 2022
2022 Street Rehabilitation Project
K:\019135-000\Admin\Construction Admin\Bidding\019135-000 Bid Tab Summary 020822
C:\Users\janele.waterman\Desktop\4. Construction Services Proposal.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM February 8, 2022
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Proposal for Construction Services for 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project
WSB Project No. R-019135-000
Dear Mr. Grochala:
WSB & Associates, Inc. is providing a proposal for construction services associated with
the 2022 Street Rehabilitation Project. This construction services proposal would be
subsequent to the City Council awarding the construction contract.
The project includes milling and overlaying the pavement, spot curb and gutter repairs,
and repairs to the water system in the proposed project area. The project area includes
West Shadow Lake Drive, Hawthorn Road, Painted Turtle Road, Hickory Place,
Ironwood Court, River Birch Place, White Owl Drive, Fox Road, and Fox Circle in the
base bid and Rondeau Lake Road W, Rondeau Lake Road E, and 81st Street W as bid
alternates.
Scope of Engineering Services
WSB is pleased to provide professional construction engineering services for the 2022
Street Rehabilitation Project including contract administration, construction observation,
construction staking, and public involvement with project stakeholders. Below is a
detailed description of the engineering services and WSB’s proposed approach.
I. Construction Services
a. Project Management/Contract Administration
Contract Administration includes holding meetings with the contractor & City
of Lino Lakes (preconstruction & weekly construction), processing monthly
quantities for pay vouchers, and communicating with residents on a regular
basis.
b. Construction Observation
WSB will provide an experienced engineering specialist whose
responsibilities will include communicating with the Contactor as an agent of
the City, calculating and keeping track of daily construction quantities and
costs, contact and meet with residents as necessary, and work with the
Contractor to assist with a quality constructed product.
c. Construction Staking (Survey)
Mr. Michael Grochala
February 8, 2022
Page 2
C:\Users\janele.waterman\Desktop\4. Construction Services Proposal.docx
WSB will provide Surveying staff as necessary to provide field staking for
necessary utility alignments, elevations, and any necessary curbing or
structure related information.
Proposed Fee
WSB will complete the scope of work the project discussed herein on hourly basis for a
not-to-exceed amount of $62,000.00. Tasks not shown are considered outside of the
scope of services. If additional work is necessary, we will prepare a detailed scope of
work and include it as an addendum to this agreement.
This letter represents our complete understanding of the 2022 Street Rehabilitation
Project and the proposed scope of services. If you agree with the scope of services and
proposed fee, please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to call me at 763-287-
8536.
Sincerely,
Mark Erichson
Brian Bourassa Mark Erichson
Client Representative Director
ACCEPTANCE:
The City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $62,000.00 for services
outlined in this letter.
City of Lino Lakes
Name
Title
Date
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE City Engineer
C. C. MEETING DATE: February 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution 22-23, Order Project, Approve the Plans
and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2022 East
Shadow Lake Drive Utility Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council approval to authorize the ad for bid for the 2022 East Shadow Lake
Drive Utility Project.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 2021, the City Council approved the preparation of the plans and specifications
for the 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility Project. The proposed improvements will include
replacement of sagging sanitary pipes, manholes, water system replacement, roadway
reconstruction and restoration of adjacent property at and near the intersection of East Shadow
Lake Drive and Lantern Lane. The project will result in reduced inflow and infiltration of
ground water in the sanitary sewer system.
The estimated total project cost is $510,000. The project is funded through the City’s Sewer
Operating Fund.
The estimated schedule for the project:
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications December 13, 2021
Order Improvement, Approve Plans and Specs, Authorize Ad for Bids February 14, 2022
City Opens Bids March 22, 2022
City Council Awards Contract March 28, 2022
Construction Begins April-May, 2022
Final Completion October, 2022
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 22-23, Order Project, Approve the Plans and
Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid for the 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility
Project.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 22-23
2. Construction Plans
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-23
RESOLUTION ORDER PROJECT, APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR 2022 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
UTILITY PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2022 East Shadow
Lake Drive Utility Project. Project plans and specifications have been presented to the City Council
for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are
hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance and
Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which
time they will be publicly opened at the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then
be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on March 28th, 2022, in the
Council chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during
consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond or certified check payable to the
Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of February, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
LANTERN LANEEAST SHADOW LAKE DRBIRCH STREET (CSAH 34)BLACK DUCK DRIVEPHEASANT RUNRED BIRCH CTBIRCH CT
WHITEE SHADOWLAKE CTLANTERNCTPARTR
I
D
G
E
P
L
A
C
E
RESHANAU LAKE
K:\017705-000\Cad\Plan\017705-000-C-TITL-PLAN.dwg 2/7/2022 3:52:52 PM2022 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE UTILITY PROJECT
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN
SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, STORM SEWER, AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTSCONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR
LOCATED ONEAST SHADOW LAKE DRFROM 250' SOUTH OF LANTERN LNTO 123' NORTH OF LANTERN LN
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
F
G
EXISTING PLAN SYMBOLS
PROPERTY LINES/RIGHT-OF-WAY
UTILITY EASEMENT
TREE LINE
SIGN
DECIDUOUS TREE
SHRUB
CONIFEROUS TREE
EXISTING UTILITY SYMBOLS
FIBER OPTIC LINE
GAS LINE
COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL
POWER POLE
ELECTRIC BOX
CATCH BASIN
STORM APRON
CCOMMUNICATION LINE
EELECTRIC POWER LINE
||WATER MAIN
>
>>
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM SEWER MANHOLE
COUNTY:ANOKA
SECT 28, TWP 31, RNG 22
PROJECT LOCATION
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THEGUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA."
GOPHER ONE CALL TICKET NUMBER: 220060200
APPROVED BYSHEET NO.DATE
PLAN REVISIONS
ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL BECOMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.
THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 13 SHEETS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:12/13/2021 43338
DIANE L. HANKEE, P.E.
SHEET
13OFWSB PROJ. NO. 017705-000
BEGIN CONSTRUCTIONEAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
END CONSTRUCTIONEAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
LANTERN LN FROM EAST SHADOW LAKE DR TO 60' EAST OF EAST SHADOW LAKE DR
1
THIS PLAN SET HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
600 TOWN CENTER PARKWAYLINO LAKES, MN 55014
(651) 982-2400
A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (651-454-0002)IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIORTO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION.
EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM
PLAN SET INDEX
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS
UTILITY INFORMATION
THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN.
ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE
LATEST FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.
E
ST
S
N
SCALE IN FEET
0
H:
300 600
HORIZONTAL DATUM:
VERTICAL DATUM: