Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/12/2020 P&Z PacketHow to Join the Meeting Phone: Dial 1-312-626-6799 Meeting ID: 856 9920 3307 Weblink: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85699203307 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, August 12, 2020 6:30 p.m. Meeting to be held electronically Pursuant to MN Statute 13D. 021 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 8, 2020 & July 15, 2020 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review B. Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat C. 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive Variance 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Update 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : July 8, 2020 TIME STARTED : 6:33 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:44 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Paul Tralle (Chair), Neil Evenson, Michael Root Perry Laden, Sue Peacock, Jeff Reinert, Nathan Vojtech STAFF PRESENT : Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Janele Waterman I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. on July 8, 2020. IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Agenda was approved as presented. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ms. Peacock made a MOTION to approve the June 10, 2020 Meeting Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. V. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Reinert. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 8, 2020 Page 2 VI. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit Amendment for All Seasons Rental (7932 Lake Drive) Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicants, Scott and Shelly Carlson, own All Seasons Rental located at 7932 Lake Drive. They are requesting an amendment to the conditional use permit to allow for outdoor storage of rental equipment. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for outdoor storage of rental equipment. Board Comments Mr. Laden stated if the applicants are going to store equipment outside, the equipment should be screened from Lake Dr. Mr. Root agreed with Mr. Laden. He recommended the applicant use a sufficient number of plantings to screen the equipment. Mr. Evenson suggested planting evergreens since space is limited between the existing fence and Lake Dr. He questioned why only a 4 ft. tall fence would be allowed to screen the equipment. Ms. Larsen explained the City ordinance allows a 6 ft. fence with the condition that it cannot be forward of the building towards the street. All Seasons Rental was not able to place the fence in line with the building because they need the space behind the building for storage. Therefore, they would only be allowed to install a 4ft. tall fence. Ms. Larsen reiterated the applicants also have the option to plant a triangulated row of coniferous trees in lieu of a fence. Mr. Laden commented if the landscaping is consistent and the applicants are able to achieve the same screening typically required by the City, landscaping would be a good option. Mr. Vojtech remarked if the trees are used for screening, the driveway will be left open. He questioned if leaving the driveway open would be an issue. Ms. Larsen stated the driveway is used for deliveries and not for public use. Mr. Laden asked if a gate is there currently. Ms. Larsen said there is an existing gate. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 8, 2020 Page 3 Chair Tralle liked the idea of the coniferous trees as a screen. Ms. Peacock suggested arborvitaes be planted since they are more resilient than other conifers. Chair Tralle explained the applicants will receive a list of trees from the City which they will pick from. Ms. Peacock asked why the applicant did not understand that the conditional use permit did not allow them to store equipment outside. Chair Tralle said he, too, assumed the applicant would be allowed to store equipment outside. Ms. Peacock questioned whether the applicant needs a lot of outdoor storage. Chair Tralle assured Ms. Peacock the applicant does need a lot of outdoor storage. Mr. Reinert inquired if the building is sold to a new owner and they have nothing to display, at what point would the display become a storage area. Ms. Larsen clarified they would not be allowed to place anything there unless they were displaying equipment for rent. Mr. Reinert asked if that would be a part of staff s consideration in the conditional use permit that is issued. Ms. Larsen stated yes, it would be taken into consideration by City staff. Chair Tralle said that is why we should reevaluate the conditional use permit when a building is sold. Applicants Comments Chair Tralle asked the applicant, Scott Carlson, if he liked the idea of the evergreens as a screen. Mr. Carlson stated he likes greenery and he thought the evergreens would provide good shielding. He clarified why he misunderstood the conditional use permit stating he was under the assumption that 25% or 1,900 sq. ft. of storage space was permitted in addition to the display area. He also informed the board All Seasons Rental is no longer a Penske truck rental agent since the trucks took up a lot of their display area and he noted the Kelly St. neighborhood would rather not see the trucks there. He further stated unless All Seasons Rental obtains a new piece of equipment they would like to display, the display area would not be utilized often and all the remaining equipment will be behind the building or behind the screen. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 8, 2020 Page 4 Chair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7:06 p.m. There were no public comments. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:07 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. Board Discussion Mr. Laden asked Ms. Larsen if she needed clarification on the board's landscaping requirement and if she had an idea of how to word the requirement into a condition. Ms. Larsen stated the screening requirement will be a triangulated coniferous row along the north section of Lake Dr. Mr. Laden asked if there would be a height requirement for the coniferous trees. Ms. Larsen explained the ordinance requirement for a screen is 6 ft. and at a minimum, the plantings have to be at a height of 6 ft. within 5 years of growth. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for All Seasons Rental with the condition outdoor storage be screened by landscaping. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. B. Nadeau Acres Final Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicant, BL Holdings, LLC, submitted a final plat land use application for Nadeau Acres. The R-1, Single Family residential development has a total of 68 lots. The final plat for the first phase contains 35 lots. Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat of Nadeau Acres subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Board Comments Mr. Root asked if the storm water runoff is higher than expected, what would the recourse be for the neighboring properties. Diane Hankee, City Engineer, stated the storm water management design is a standard design. The storm water runoff has met the requirements for the standard agencies and pollution control agencies. Ms. Hankee expressed confidence in the design stating this type of storm water management system is found throughout the City in similar soils and it functions properly. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 8, 2020 Page 5 Mr. Root inquired of the storm water management capacity considering nature is unpredictable and it can be difficult to plan for every weather scenario. Ms. Hankee explained in the event we receive a significant storm, the pond is equipped with an emergency overflow system. Chair Tralle wondered if a major catastrophe were to occur, can the Vickers be assured that the City would repair the pond. Ms. Hankee reminded the board the City has a drainage and utility easement on the Vickers' property and the City owns the storm water pond; therefore, the City is responsible for maintaining it. If a catastrophe were to occur, ideally it would be contained within the easement and the City would fix any downstream erosion issues. In order to protect all City and private property owners, baseline data was gathered for existing ditches as well. She also noted data was gathered for the Nelson property. Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat of Nadeau Acres subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. C. Poehlin Addition Final Plat Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicants, Jerome and Mona Poehling, submitted a land use application for the final plat of Poehling Addition. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel into 2 single family lots for the purpose of constructing one (1) new single family home. The lot is located at 6790 West Shadow Lake Drive and is 0.78 gross acres (34,023 sf) as measured above the OHWL. Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat for Poehling Addition. Board Comments Mr. Reinert commented on the shoreline buffer requirements of the new lot being imposed on the existing lot. He asked if the shoreline buffer requirements are going to cause a lot of construction for the homeowner. Ms. Larsen stated a planting of native grasses will be required for the shoreline buffer. She also mentioned an equal amount of excavation will occur on the existing and new lot for the mitigation area. Mr. Reinert asked the Poehlings if they had any issues with the shoreline buffer requirements. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 8, 2020 Page 6 Mr. Poehling explained they do not have any issue with the shoreline buffer requirements nor do they see the work being arduous because there is a partial buffer current in place. Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Poehling Addition Final Plat. Motion was supported by Ms. Peacock. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. VIL DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Proiect Updates Staff provided verbal updates to the Board on current City projects. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:44 p.m. Motion was supported by Ms. Peacock. Motion carried 6 - 0. Chair Tralle abstained. Respectfully submitted, Janele Waterman, Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD WORK SESSION MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT I. DISCUSSION ITEMS : July 15, 2020 . 3:01 P.M. . 3:50 P.M. : Paul Tralle (Chair), Neil Evenson, Michael Root Perry Laden, Sue Peacock, Jeff Reinert, Nathan Vojtech : Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Janele Waterman A. Lyn2blomsten at Lino Lakes — Presentation by Wold Architects and Engineers Brian Prunty, from Wold Architects and Engineers, delivered the presentation. Board Comments Mr. Root questioned why the building design changed from the October submittal to the May submittal. Mr. Prunty explained the October submittal simply displayed the concept for the development, but it did not include the mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, and civil elements. Therefore, once those components were added to the design plan, the floor plan and roof components changed. Mr. Root expressed his appreciation for the original design from October. He further clarified, the aesthetics of the design were appealing and it seemed to mimic the design of the City Center. He acknowledged the design changes that had been made since the May submittal, but was concerned the design appears to look like a large hotel or corporate headquarters. Mr. Root also remarked on Lyngblomsten's signage on the exterior of the building. He stated the monument sign would be sufficient for informing passersby what the building is and therefore, the signage on the exterior of the building is not necessary. Ms. Peacock liked the three color schemes for the townhomes. She said the main building's windows in this submittal were boxy and reminiscent of an institution whereas the windows in the plan from October were more narrow, longer, and gave more differentiation to the building's design. Mr. Reinert said the design changes made since May's presentation were much improved. He clarified this presentation had more depth and he remarked the Wold team is moving in the right direction. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 15, 2020 Page 2 Mr. Laden stated the design has improved greatly from the previous design, but he was concerned about the Hodgson elevation since the building is a four story building and it will be close to the sidewalk. He specified the cap gives an impression the building is top heavy on the side of the building facing Hodgson. He suggested Lyngblomsten add a cornice at the top of the first story to make the building appear less grandiose in height. Mr. Laden asked Ms. Larsen, the City Planner, what the purpose of a cornice is. Ms. Larsen explained cornices are architectural decorative features and are not necessarily functional. Mr. Evenson said the plans presented were a big improvement from the last design. He remarked he is not opposed to the exterior signage on the building. He said he did not like the color scheme of the building particularly the blue color. He wondered if Lyngblomsten had addressed the board's concern with utilizing the artic white color on the building's exterior. Mr. Vojtech commented on the signage and explained since elderly citizens will be visiting the building often, it may be beneficial to have the exterior signage on the building to assist those who are trying to find it on a busy road. He also remarked it is hard to know where the monument sign will be placed and how visible it will be when traveling in either direction on Hodgson. Chair Tralle liked the color schemes for the townhomes and the overall design changes. He appreciated the removal of one of the signs from the building's exterior and said one sign is adequate as opposed to two. Tu-Ahn Bui Johnson, from Wold Architects and Engineers, informed the board it was a conscious decision from the owners' to bring the mechanical outward instead of inside the units. She explained by moving the mechanical outward it makes the units bigger and more pleasant. However, she clarified, by doing so, this creates the vertical elements on the exterior and that played a major role in the changes of the exterior design of the building. Mr. Reinert stated the windows appear to be all the same shape and size. He acknowledged the expense of custom windows, but suggested if the windows could be altered, it would be an improvement to the overall design of the building. Mr. Laden asked if there is a way to set the windows or get a product that sets the windows in deeper so there is more of a shadow line. Mr. Prunty explained there are a few options for setting the windows. If the board would like to see the windows set in a couple of inches only detailing around the windows would be required. If the board would like to box in or recess the windows, the floorplan will be impacted. He assured the board, if they would like to recess the windows, he and his team would explore a few options. He also stated the DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 15, 2020 Page 3 windows may appear small in comparison to the grand scale of the building, but the windows are a good size. Mr. Reinert inquired what the rough measurements of the windows were. Ms. Bui Johnson specified the windows are 3 ft. by 6 ft. separately, but together 6 ft. by 6 ft. or 5 ft. by 6 ft. Rick Moore, from Wold Architects and Engineers, explained in order to recess the windows, they would have to recess the framing around the window, then sheath, and side all the way back in. He furthered clarified, this creates a lot of pockets that could potentially leak and it would be a very expensive process to recess all of the windows. Another option, he shared, would utilize a non -nailing flange which would set the windows back and they would have to caulk and seal the windows. He acknowledged, however, the team at Wold decided not to pursue this option because they felt the seal was not as good for the building in the long term. Mr. Evenson agreed with Mr. Reinert the original design had variation in window size and the differentiation improved the aesthetics of the building. Ms. Peacock concurred. She expressed concern with the normal, square window design and suggested the windows be differentiated in order to create a more impressive exterior. Judd Fenlon, from Grand Real Estate Advisors, informed the board the window sizes are comparable to what is used in other multi -family projects. He further noted the board would see differentiation in window size in the community room, the restaurant, the pool, and the multi -purpose room. He also clarified the courtyard will be unique in design with a balcony hanging over the courtyard and, in the summer months, it will be full of tables, umbrellas, and a stage for music. He said he would continue to talk to the design team regarding the board's feedback. Mr. Fenlon addressed Lyngblomsten's budget and stated the underwriters have been giving Lyngblomsten grief because of the project's per square foot and per unit cost. He explained Lyngblomsten's construction costs are $208 per square foot and Northland Securities is comparing them to three other projects whose construction costs are $191, $170, and $168 per square foot. Furthermore, Lyngblomsten's cost per unit is $335,000 and those comparable to Lyngblomsten cost $247,000, $264,000, and $259,000 per unit. Because of these comparables, he stated Lyngblomsten does not believe they are being stingy with the budget. Lastly, he assured the board the amenities package offered and the building in its entirety will be very attractive. Mr. Reinert asked what the year is of the comparables. Mr. Fenlon explained two of the projects are under construction and Lyngblomsten received the comparables 60 days ago. The third project had not yet closed. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 15, 2020 Page 4 Mr. Moore remarked the renderings for the project are generated by a computer at a distance, but once construction begins, the detail and texture of the exterior products will be noticeable, especially when walking along Hodgson. Chair Tralle asked what kind of siding will be used on the exterior, how good is the product's quality, and if it is prone to leaking. Mr. Prunty expounded the siding is a hardie siding that Wold has used on other projects very successfully. He clarified, when products leak, it is usually due to the poor installation of the weather barrier, the scratch coat, and the flashing, but it is not a fault of the siding product. Ms. Larsen questioned if the board was okay with the height variations of the roof. Mr. Evenson said it is difficult to tell what 1 or 2 feet of height differentiation will do for the overall design, but the renderings look good. Mr. Grochala, Community Development Director, remarked the height variation provides visual interest and breaks up the building lengths. Chair Tralle asked Mike Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane, if he had any questions. Mr. Witham wondered if the outside trash area would be addressed. Chair Tralle clarified the outside trash area was addressed at the previous meeting and it was decided the outside trash area would be permitted since it will be enclosed with fencing and screened by trees. Mr. Laden suggested cornices be added around the whole building wherever the stone meets the siding. He clarified, with the addition of the cornices, he would be willing to move forward with the Lyngblomsten project. He also asked if more detail regarding the recess of the windows could be provided at the next Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Prunty assured Mr. Laden the window detail would be provided at the next meeting. II. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Reinert made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 3:50 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6-0. Chair Tralle abstained. Respectfully submitted, Janele Waterman, Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE Katie Larsen, City Planner August 12, 2020 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Otter Crossing 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Site Plan Review CASE NUMBER: PP2020-001 SP2020-002 APPLICANT: Tyme Properties, LLC Attn: Paul Schreier 3435 Labore Road Suite 150 Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 OWNER: Same REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: July 21, 2020 60-Day Review Deadline: September 19, 2020 120-Day Review Deadline: November 18, 2020 Environmental Board Meeting: July 29, 2020 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: August 12, 2020 City Council Work Session: September 8, 2020 City Council Meeting: September 14, 2020 BACKGROUND The applicant, Tyme Properties, LLC, is creating a 1.43 acre parcel for the purpose of constructing a 7,800 sf commercial retail building. The name of the preliminary plat is Otter Crossing. The Land Use Application is for the following: • Preliminary Plat o Lot 1 and Outlots A-F, Otter Crossing 1 • Site Plan Review o Commercial retail building This staff report is based on the following information: • Narrative prepared by applicant dated July 17, 2020 • Civil and Architectural Plan Set prepared by Edward Farr Architects and Pioneer Engineering dated July 13, 2020 • Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020 • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated June 26, 2020 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated February 7, 2020 • Wetland Permit Application prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated July 13, 2020 ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions The 29 acre site is located in the northwest quadrant of Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street). The site is currently vacant commercial land that is being used for agricultural row crops. The soils range from lean clay to poorly graded sand clay. Hydrologic soil groups consist of a combination of B/D, B, C and B/D. Groundwater was encountered at 3 to 12.5 ft below ground surface. Topography is general flat. Wetlands exist on the site. Zoning and Land Use The parcel is zoned GB, General Business and allows for retail business as a permitted use. Current Zoning GB, General Business Current Land Use Vacant Commercial Future Land Use per CP Commercial Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use 2 Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use R-BR North Rural Business Agricultural Commercial Reserve South Vacant Commercial Commercial GeneraGBusiness East GB Commercial Commercial General Business West Vacant Commercial Commercial GeneraGBusiness Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development and zoning code requirements for GB, General Business as detailed below. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat contains Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A-F, Otter Crossing. The outlots are for future development and private road (Outlot D). Parcel r Acres Purpose Lot 1, Block 1 1.4275 Retail building Outlot A 19.125 Future development & stormwater pond Outlot B 1.437 Future development Outlot C 2.2782 Future development Outlot D 0.6687 Private Road Outlot E 1.1566 Future development Outlot F 1.1946 Future development TOTAL 27.2876 Since there are no underlying preliminary plat and development plans for Outlots A, B, C, E and F, they shall be platted as one outlot until time of future development. The outlot will then be preliminary and final platted. This will be similar to the development of Main Street Shoppes to the east of Otter Lake Road. The preliminary plat shall show the delineated wetland and acreage. Streets and Alleys A private road from Otter Lake Road extends west across the north boundary of Lot 1, Block 1. The private road is proposed within Outlot D. Outlot D shall be incorporated into Outlot A and a private road easement agreement or Operating, Easements and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) recorded over it. This will avoid any issues with future ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the private road. The developer is proposing to record an OEM after ownership of the outlots is transferred; however, staff has concerns regarding future ownership of the outlot. No public street improvements are required except for a southbound right turn lane from Otter Lake Road onto CSAH 14 (Main Street). The private road is proposed at 28ft wide back to back. To be consistent with Main Street Shoppes, it shall be revised to 30ft. An additional 60 ft of road right-of-way is being dedicated along Otter Lake Road except for a 35 ft wide strip that was acquired by the City in 2013 for the purpose of constructing Otter Lake Road. Similar to Main Street Shoppes, a Declaration of Access Control will be required. The Declaration shall state the private access road to the development will have full access to Otter Lake Road upon completion, but such full access must be reduced to right -in, right - out access upon further extension of the Otter Lake Road to the north. Staff notes the private road shall extend north to serve future development and eventually connect to the future full access at Otter Lake Road. The stormwater pond located at the west end of the private road would require the future road extension to impact a wider section of wetland. The developer may want to consider a redesign of the pond to allow for future private road extension with less wetland impacts. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided on Lot 1, Block 1 except for the west lot line. An easement shall be provided there. A drainage and utility easement is required over the private road and the stormwater pond facilities. Previously recorded highway easements and utility easements along CSAH 14 (Main Street) exist on site. Public Land Dedication The City will collect a cash fee of $3,603 minus trail construction credits in lieu of land dedication for commercial development for Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Crossing. A trail shall be constructed along the west side of Otter Lake Drive and construction costs credited to the developer. Otter Crossing 1.43 acres x $2,520 per acre = $3,603 Trail Construction Costs = TBD TOTAL = TBD Site and Building Plan Review Site Plan The applicant is proposing to construct a 7,800 sf commercial retail building with 6 units on Lot 1, Block 1, Otter Crossing. The site plan indicates a drive -through service on the east side of the building which is allowed as an accessory use in the GB, General Business district. The site plan provides an area on the southwest and southeast corner of the building for accessory outdoor dining or seating facility. This will require an Administrative Permit to be submitted by the future tenant. As discussed with the developer in previous meetings, staff is recommending the building be shifted towards CSAH 14 (Main Street) to mirror Main Street Shoppes. The intent is to create the private road as the "Main Street" to the development with commercial buildings and parking lots fronting the street. This will also be a similar to the commercial development on CSAH 14 (Main Street) as it extends into the City of Hugo. The developer's reasons for locating the building on the north side are as follows: "The developer's reasoning for the building being located on the north side of the lot is multi faceted. A building located on the south side of the lot as you are suggesting would mean the storefront entrances and the sidewalks would be on the north facing side of the building. The north facing side of the building does not receive direct sun. The lack of sun to help dry sidewalks after rains and aid in melting snow and ice buildup in the winter leads to increased maintenance costs, prolonged moisture resulting in building discoloration, and increased use of ice melt that deteriorates sidewalks and the building. There is also an increased risk of "slip and falls "for customers and businesses as a result of potential ice buildup. This increased risk leads to higher insurance costs and thus, higher operating costs for businesses and building owners. A north facing building does not benefit from increased natural solar gain through the storefront either. Again, that increases heating costs and operating costs in the winter months. Tyme Properties LLC manages other north facing buildings and has experienced these very issues and costs. One of the aforementioned buildings had to have the storefront and blockwork that supported it completely replaced far before its expected useful life due to salt and moisture deterioration that was mentioned earlier. 5 Furthermore, a north facing building located on the southern portion of the lot would require tenant signage on the front and back of the building in order for customers to find our tenant's businesses. Visibility is a key component of a tenant's business being successful and plays a significant role in leasing space in a building. Tenants willing and able to pay new construction rents, (high rents), depend on visibility and need to face the busy roadways. Our submission promotes visibility, efficiency, and the optimal use of the site. We have already received feedback from one of our promising national anchor tenants that our site plan is "great" and they "love it. " Our proposed site plan and building location is similar to the McDonald's site. It preserves intersection sight lines and visibility to the remaining outlots to the west. We have put a lot of thought and experience into our site plan and as far as we know, it fully complies with the city's requirements as submitted. " A 5 ft wide concrete sidewalk is shown along the north lot line. A trail shall be constructed on the west side of Otter Lake Road with connection to the development and pedestrian crossing at the CSAH 14 intersection. Overall, the proposed commercial building meets ordinance and performance standard requirements unless otherwise noted. Lot Size and Setbacks The front lot line is along CSAH 14 (Main Street) because it is the public road right-of- way. The rear lot line is along the private road. GB Re uirements Lot 1, Block 1 Otter Crossing Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 62,181 sf Min Lot Width 100 ft 240 ft Setbacks -Street Required Proposed Principal Building-CSAH 14 (arterial) 40 ft 110 ft Principal Building -Otter Lake Road collector 40 ft 45 ft Parking Lot 15 ft 15 and 20 ft Setbacks -Side Yard (west) Required Proposed IN Principal Building loft 50 ft Accessory Building loft NA Parking Lot/Driveway loft 5ft1 Setbacks -Rear Yard (Private Road) Required Proposed Principal Building 30 ft 50 ft Accessory Building (trash enclosure) 5 ft 18 ft Parking Lot/Driveway loft 15 ft This shall be revised to 10 feet. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials The retail building is single story with exterior materials consisting of brick, glass and EIFS. The color palette consists of earth tone dark gray, brown, light tan brick and light gray, medium gray, dark bronze and teal EIFS. Metal canopy and fabric awnings also accent the building. The ordinance allows for stucco or EIFS on no more than 30% of the primary front building elevation and no more than 60% of any side or rear building elevation. The primary front elevation has 14% EIFS and rear elevation has 47% EIFS and the sides have 26% and 19%. The materials and percentages are compliant with performance standards. The building height is 23' 8" which is less than that maximum 45 ft allowed. A trash enclosure is proposed on the north side of building. Construction details provided on Sheet A3 indicate light tan and brown utility brick over concrete block. The gate is painted metal deck swing gate that has 100% opacity. The enclosure is 7' 6" in height. The trash enclosure meets performance standards. Per Sheet A3, the mechanical equipment is located on the rooftop and screened by parapets. The building will be sprinkled for fire suppression. Drive -through The east end cap suite is proposed to have a drive -through for a coffee shop or fast food restaurant. Drive -through service facilities are allowed accessory uses in the GB, General 7 Business District. The drive -through meets the performance standards except for the following comments that shall be addressed: 1. Details of order board intercom shall be provided with the building permit. 2. Photometric plan shall include service lane lighting. 3. Additional 30 inch high coniferous landscape screening shall be provided along the Otter Lake Road right-of-way to screen the drive -through. Outdoor Lighting Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. Sheet Sl-1, Site Photometric Plan indicates light sources exceeding these limits and shall be revised. Light fixtures on the both the building and 28ft high poles are down lit and cutoff as required by city code. Architectural entry access lights are allowed on the front and side elevations. Off -Street Parking Requirements Sheet Al indicates 6 potential tenant spaces (5 retail and 1 restaurant/drive-through). Per Section 1007.044(6), retail stores require 1 space per 200 sf of floor area and fast food requires 15 spaces per 1,000 sf gross floor area. This would require 26 retail parking stalls and 27 restaurant parking stalls for a total of 53 stalls required. The site plan provides 71 parking stalls so this requirement is met. It should be noted that any retail space proposed for any use other than retail (i.e. restaurant) shall meet the parking requirement ordinance. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management Per the Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020, the existing topography can be divided into 3 portions. The northern section of the property is generally flat agricultural land used for row crops. This area drains to the northeast to an existing wetland area which then flows to the north. The southern portion of the property is made up of primarily flat agricultural land that is used for row crops. This area drains to a large wetland toward the center which outlets at the southwest corner through a culvert under CSAH 14. The last portion of the property is a small portion on the east side of the property that drains to the existing storm sewer on Otter Lake Road. The glacial till soils consisted of lean clay, sandy lean clay, clayey sand, silty sand, and poorly graded sand with silt. Groundwater was encountered in six of the soil borings ranging from 3 to 9 feet below the surface. N. The parking lot for this commercial development will be collected in a storm sewer system which will connect to the proposed private road to the north. This storm sewer will be routed to the west where a basin with connected filtration cell will be constructed to abut the existing wetland. This basin will outlet to the existing Wetland A. This wetland will outlet through the culvert located at the southwest, which drains under CSAH 14. The pond is sized for Lot 1 and the private road and may be expanded to accommodate future development. The proposed stormwater management facility shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and RCWD to determine compliance for rate control, water quality and volume control. Public Utilities The new retail building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along the private road that extend from Otter Lake Road. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The Environmental Coordinator and Environment Board reviewed the tree preservation and landscaping requirements. The following comments are from the July 29, 2020 Environmental Board staff report. The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey will not be required for this site, because there are no trees over 6 inch DBH to survey. Preservation and mitigation standards do not apply to this site. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2000 sq.ft. If the storm water pond area is going to be permanent, open space plantings will be required. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. X This project calls for a 30 inch high planting screen. Continuous screen is not present on the north perimeter. Planning staff also notes the 30 inch screen is required to provide year round screening and therefore, should be coniferous shrubs. Buffer and screen standards have not been met. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Canopy coverage values are calculated per tree based on the anticipated size 15 years after planting, and the distance to hardscape edge from the planting location. Vehicular hardscape planned: 34,276 sq ft Canopy cover requirement: 13,710 sq ft Canopy cover provided: 8,675 sq ft Canopy cover requirements have not been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree = 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs For 320 linear feet of applicable foundation, 7 large trees and 20 large shrubs (or acceptable substitutes) are required for the north, east, and south building faces. The plans indicate: These substitutions are equivalent to 3 medium trees 14 medium shrubs 25 small shrubs 1 large tree 17 large shrubs The foundation landscape requirements have not been met in terms of numbers or with respect to placement. Sod and Ground Cover Standards 10 All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Area around the storm water pond from normal water level to high water level will be seeded with MnDOT 33-261, Stormwater South and West, which is a native mix of grasses, forbs, sedges, and rushes for stormwater pond edges. Above high water level in the storm water pond area calls for 35-621 Dry Prairie Southeast. The area north of Lot 1 will also have MnDot 35-621 to create a buffer strip for Wetland A near the impacted portion of the wetland. The remainder of the site will be seeded with MnDot 25-141 Mesic Roadside General or sodded. The Seeding Plan indicates this mix covering areas of the site that call for sod on the Landscape Plan. These two plan sheets should match. Sheet L1, Landscape Plan notes irrigation designed by others. An irrigation plan shall be submitted. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are not required for commercial developments. Signage A comprehensive sign plan for the entire building is required for multi -occupancy business buildings. The comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted with the sign permit application for all wall and monument signs. Preliminary review of the ground monument signs indicates they meet size and height requirements. The northeast sign does not meet the 30ft clear vision triangle and shall be relocated. Ground signs are only allowed along public road frontage i.e. CSAH 14 (Main Street) and Otter Lake Road. The ground sign in the northwest corner of the site shall be omitted. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage in the GB, General Business District is 75%. The lot area of Lot 1 is 1.43 acres with 1.05 acres impervious which equals 75%. The proposed post -development impervious surface coverage is compliant. Traffic Study 11 A formal traffic study is not required. The updated 2020 I-35E Corridor AUAR analyzed traffic impacts for commercial development along this entire corridor. The proposed retail building is consistent with AUAR Land Use Scenarios #1 and #2 for commercial development. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Reliever and A Minor Collector roads, respectively, and have structural capacity to handle the commercial traffic. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identifies this site as commercial in the land use scenarios. The Otter Crossing project is consistent with commercial development. No further environmental assessment is required. Wetlands A wetland delineation report was completed by Midwest Natural Resources on September 4, 2019. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 9, 2019. Two wetlands were delineated. Wetland A is 2.59 acres and Wetland B is 1.19 acres. This project as proposed will involve impacts to Wetland A, which include 3,600 sq ft (0.0826 acre) of fill to allow for grading and construction of Street A, and 1,670 sq ft (0.0383 acre) of excavation that will allow for construction of an outlet pipe to discharge water from the storm water pond to the southwestern portion of Wetland A. There are no proposed impacts to Wetland B. Wetland mitigation being proposed for permanently impacting Wetland A will involve the purchase of 7,200 sq. ft. of Type 2, CORP-approved wetland banking credits from wetland bank #1522 which is located within the same Major Watershed (Mississippi Metro — 20) and Bank Service Area (7) as the subject property. The wetlands are not within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) so a WMC wetland buffer is not required. A drainage & utility easement is being dedicated over the stormwater pond and a portion of the wetland. Additional easements will be dedicated in conjunction with future development of the outlots. Shoreland District The development is not located in the Shoreland District. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. 12 Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department is reviewing the development and will provide comment. Public Safety Comments Deputy Director L'Allier notes a hydrant shall be located closer to the Fire Department Connector (FDC) on the north side of the building near the transformer. The Police Division reviewed the plans and had no issues that needed to be addressed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their July 29, 2020 meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City's Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement. The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. Final Plat and Development Agreement The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Resource Management System The Resource Management System Plan goal of preserving surface water quality is supported by the construction of stormwater management BMP's such as curb, gutter, and stormwater pond. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The proposed retail building is consistent with commercial land use. Housing Plan 13 The goals and policies of Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the commercial retail development. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Arterial Expander and A Minor Arterial Connector roads, respectively, and have structural capacity to handle the traffic volume of the commercial retail building. Sanitary Sewer and Water Supply Plan The new retail building will be municipally served by an 8" PVC sanitary sewer and an 8" DIP watermain located along the private road that extends from Otter Lake Road. The existing sanitary sewer and water supply system have capacity for the new development. Findings of Fact Preliminary Plat Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision maybe deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Otter Crossing is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 14 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Otter Crossing is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area IA=2008-2015. The cost of utility and private road extensions are being privately financed by the developer. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)l. to 4. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic 15 generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Otter Crossing meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). The I-35E Corridor AUAR analyzed traffic impacts for commercial development of this entire corridor. The proposed retail building is consistent with the AUAR Land Use Scenarios for commercial development. Otter Lake Road and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are A Minor Arterial Expander and A Minor Arterial Connector roads, respectively and have structural capacity to handle the traffic volume of the commercial retail building. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City's capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Otter Crossing will have an adequate water supply. An 8 " DIP watermain along the private road extending from Otter Lake Road will serve the development. The City's water system has capacity to accommodate the commercial development. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Otter Crossing will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area IA=2008-2015 and will be served by an 8" 16 PVC sewer main along the private road extending from Otter Lake Road. The sanitary sewer system has capacity to accommodate the commercial development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and site plan review for Otter Crossing with the following conditions: 1. A private road easement and maintenance agreement or Operating, Easements, and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) shall be recorded for the private road. 2. Details of the drive -through order board intercom shall be provided with the building permit for that unit. 3. An Administrative Permit is required for any outdoor dining. 4. The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. The following comments shall be addressed at the time of final plat submittal: 1. All comments from the City Engineer letter dated August 6, 2020 shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 4, 2020 shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Anoka County Highway Department letter dated (to follow) shall be addressed. 4. Deputy Director L'Allier notes a hydrant shall be located closer to the Fire Department Connector (FDC) on the north side of the building near the transformer. 5. A draft private road easement and maintenance agreement or Operating, Easements, and Maintenance Agreement (OEM) shall be provided for City review and approval. 6. A comprehensive sign plan for the entire building is required. 7. All applicable plan sheets: a. A trail on the west side of Otter Lake Road and a pedestrian cross walk with signal improvements at the CSAH 14 and Otter Lake Road intersection shall be provided. Construction costs shall also be provided. 8. Sheet 1. 1, Exiting Conditions: a. The acreage of the each wetland shall be included. 9. Sheet 3. 1, Preliminary Plat: a. Outlots A thru D shall be one (1) outlot. b. Outlot D shall be incorporated into the outlot and a private road easement and maintenance agreement recorded over it. c. A drainage and utility easement shall be platted over the private road. d. The delineated wetland boundary and acreages shall be included. e. The chart shall reflect data for the entire 29 acre parcel and include the wetland acreage. 17 f. A standard drainage and utility easement is required along the west lot line of Lot 1. 10. Sheet 3.2 Preliminary Site Plan: a. This plan sheet shall be consistent with Sheet Al, Site Plan. Staff suggests creating only one (1) Site Plan Sheet with all pertinent information to avoid conflicting information and confusion. b. The parking lot setback along the west lot line shall be 10 feet. c. The drive -through lane at the south entrance shall be a minimum 12 feet wide. d. Actual building setback dimensions shall be shown on all four (4) sides. e. Locations of the two (2) ground signs shall be shown outside of the 30 ft vision triangle. f. The developer may want to consider a redesign of the stormwater pond to allow for future private road extension with less wetland impacts. 11. Sheet L.1, Landscape Plan: a. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated August 4, 2020 shall be addressed. b. Planning staff also notes the 30 inch screen around the parking lot and drive -through lane is required to provide year round screening and therefore, should be coniferous shrubs. c. The ground sign in the northwest corner of the site shall be removed. 12. Sheet Al, Architectural Site and Signage Plan: a. This plan sheet shall be consistent with 3.2 Preliminary Site Plan. Staff suggests creating only one (1) Site Plan Sheet with all pertinent information to avoid conflicting information and confusion. b. The northwest monument shall be omitted. c. The northeast monument shall be located outside the 30ft vision triangle. d. The parking calculation chart is incorrect and shall be revised. 13. Sheet SL-1,Site Photometric Plan: a. Light sources exceed 1.0 fc onto right-of-way and 0.4 fc onto adjacent property limits and shall be revised ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location and Aerial Map 2. City Engineer letter dated August 6, 2020 3. Environmental Coordinator letter August 4, 2020 4. Applicant Narrative 5. Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat, Civil Plans and Architectural Plans Otter Crossing 1 in = 400 ft N A July 22, 2020 C I T O F Map Powered By DataLink 11N LAKES wsb 7. 0 U z w m U) 0 04 0 V) z J D a a z a U) 0 0 w U) w w F- U) x w 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Date: August 6, 2020 Re: Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat Review 16587-000 WSB has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Utility Plans for the Otter Crossing development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Pioneer Engineering received on July 20, 2020. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. These comments are based on review of the following plan sets and documents: • Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat & Site Plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020 • Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated July 6, 2020 • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated June 26, 2020 • Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated February 7, 2020 Engineering • Grading The Otter Crossing development includes site grading for the private street, the proposed building and parking lot, and the stormwater basin. Comments: 1. Applicant to confirm that the proposed 918 contour connects into the existing 918 contour on the east side of the building. 2. Applicant shall show the location of the HWL of Basin 1 P. • Stormwater Management The stormwater on the site flows to three different locations from the site. The northern section of the property drains to the northeast to an existing wetland area which then flows to the north. The southern portion of the property drains to a large wetland toward the center of the property which outlets at the southwest corner through a culvert under CSAH 14. A small portion of the east side of the property drains to an existing storm sewer on Otter Lake Road. Ms. Katie Larsen 8/6/2020 Page 2 The surface water will flow to a new stormwater basin. Storm sewer is proposed to collect water from the parking lot and private road and then direct it via overland flow to the proposed Basin 1 P. Basin 1 P is designed to discharge southwest to the existing wetland, Wetland A. Basin 1 P is designed to meet City requirements for water quality, volume control and rate control. After the project is completed, the site will include approximately 1.3 acres of new impervious surfaces including the streets, paths, parking lots, and rooftops. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 3 to 9 feet below the ground surface. Approximately 1" to 1.5" of topsoil was encountered. Below the topsoil, soils consist of native glacial till with lean clay, sandy lean clay, clayey sand, silty sand, and poorly graded sand with silt. The applicant used a HydroCAD model based on the Atlas 14, 24-hour storms to design the storm sewer conveyance system and basin. The site is designed to reduce site runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year rainfall events. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year Condition North South North South North South Pre- 0.32 2.72 0.70 6.62 1.65 12.18 Development Post- 0.27 2.38 0.40 6.00 0.69 11.86 Development Post -development stormwater discharge rates are less than the pre -development rates. Comments: 1. The City does not allow 12-inch diameter storm sewer as part of the public system due to maintenance concerns. Applicant shall update pipes within Outlot D to a minimum 15-inch diameter pipe. 2. Basin 1 P is assumed to be temporary based on the proposed location and concept plans for this area. What is the applicant's ultimate stormwater management plan for this site? • Water Supply There is existing 16-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain along Otter Lake Road east of the site. There is an existing 8-inch diameter DIP watermain stub at the intersection of Otter Lake Road and the existing private road. The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan does not designate any trunk watermain going through this site. The applicant is proposing an 8-inch diameter PVC watermain to serve the development. The watermain will extend from the east (Otter Lake Road) along Street A (the private road) and dead end at the end of the proposed private road. A 6-inch diameter PVC watermain service is proposed to service the building. Comments: Otter Crossing Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 8/6/2020 Page 3 1. The Deputy Director of Public Safety - Fire division has reviewed the hydrant layout and has suggested moving the proposed hydrant on the east side of the building to the north side of the building in the seeded area between parking stalls. • Sanitary Sewer There is an existing 8-inch diameter poly -vinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer stub at the intersection of Otter Lake Road and existing private road. The invert of the stub is approximately 898.04 and is to be field verified. The applicant is proposing to serve the development with 8-inch diameter PVC sanitary sewer. A 6-inch diameter schedule 40 service pipe is proposed for the proposed building. Comments: 1. Applicant shall consider a cleanout for the sanitary service. • Transportation A specific Traffic Study was not completed for the proposed Otter Creek (Lot 1) site. However, the 1-35E Corridor AUAR completed an analysis for the impacts of the anticipated development of the entire corridor including the Otter Lake Road commercial area. Based on ITE 10th Addition Trip Generation rates the proposed Otter Crossing (Lot 1) would generate approximately 1,114 daily trips, 79 AM peak hour trips and 81 PM peak hour trips. Otter Lake Road is currently classified as an A -Minor Collector roadway and is proposed as a future A- Minor Arterial Expander roadway in the 2040 City Comprehensive Plan. Main Street (CSAH 14) is classified as an A -Minor Arterial Connector roadway now and in the 2040 City Comprehensive Plan. Based on the AUAR and the City's 2040 Transportation Plan, Otter Lake Road is proposed to be extended north to 80th Street as development occurs in the area. In addition, a southbound right turn lane approaching Main Street (CSAH 14) was identified as a mitigation measure in the AUAR. The addition of the right turn lane will add necessary intersection capacity for the proposed Otter Crossing development. With the proposed improvement all intersections and roadways are anticipated to meet the City's Ordinance requirements for Level of Service and would have the structural capacity to accommodate the proposed Otter Crossing (Lot 1) development. Additional analysis will be required as development continues and Otter Lake Road is extended. Street A is proposed to be 28-ft wide from the back of curb to the back of curb. The entrance to the parking lot is proposed at 24-ft wide from the face of the curb to the face of the curb. The Street A used to access the site will be accessed from Otter Lake Road. As discussed above, the applicant is proposing widening Otter Lake Road to allow for a right turn lane (to westbound Main Street (CSAH 14)), a through lane, and a left turn lane (to eastbound Main Street (CSAH 14)). Comments: 1. The private drive to the new Otter Crossing will be a right in/right out in the future when Otter Lake Road is extended. The full access will be 660' north of Otter Crossing Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 8/6/2020 Page 4 Main Street (CSAH 14). With future development, Street A will need to have access to this full access intersection. 2. Applicant shall update the width of Street A to match the width of the existing private road to the east of Otter Lake Road (30' F-F). 3. Applicant shall provide geotechnical recommendation for private road section or use current City of Lino Lakes standards. See detail GEN-1 updated in 2020. Public roads shall use the City of Lino Lakes standards (4.5" bituminous, 8" aggregate, 24" select granular). 4. Applicant to review how right turn lane radius ties into the existing Main Street (CSAH 14) intersection. The pedestrian ramp and traffic signal system will also require revisions. Coordinate intersection improvements impacting Main Street (CSAH 14) with Anoka County. 5. Applicant shall show proposed southbound Otter Lake Road layout (right turn arrow, thru arrow, left turn arrow) on the site plan and include length and width of lanes. 6. Applicant to install an 8.5-ft wide trail between the private road and Main Street (CSAH 14). A striped pedestrian crossing shall be installed across Otter Lake Rd at Main Street (CSAH 14). Applicant shall work with Anoka County to address associated signal updates. 7. Applicant shall provide an ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramp at the intersection of Street A and Otter Lake Road. 8. Applicant shall provide widths of the drive-thru and through lanes on the site plan. Staff recommends 12-ft wide lanes. 9. Applicant to review garbage truck access to enclosure with current layout. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Midwest Natural Resources prepared a Wetland Delineation Report dated September 4, 2019. A Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on December 12, 2019. Per the report, two wetlands were delineated on site totaling 4.29 acres. Wetland A is a Type 1/2/3 seasonally flooded basin/fresh wet meadow/shallow marsh wetland complex and is approximately 2.59 acres. Wetland B is a Type 1/2/3 seasonally flooded basin/fresh wet meadow/shallow marsh wetland complex and is approximately 1.70 acres. Wetland A is located in the center of the site and Wetland B is located in the northeastern part of the property. Both wetlands extend off of the property. The project area is not located within the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan (CWPMP). The applicant is proposing 0.12 acres of disturbance to Wetland A and will be purchasing wetland banking credits. Comments: 1. Applicant to confirm if 10-ft buffer easement required from wetland boundaries. • Landscaping The applicant is proposing to plant overstory trees, ornamental trees, shrubs, and perennials to meet planning and zoning requirements and to provide screening of the parking lot and drive -through. Seeding is proposed to restore all disturbed areas. Otter Crossing Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 8/6/2020 Page 5 Comments: 1. Sight distance from the intersection of Otter Lake Rd and Main Street (CSAH 14) shall be provided or labelled on the plan to determine if it is acceptable. The City's ordinance requires a 30 ft clear zone from the back of the curb at intersections. The applicant shall provide a clear (no vegetation or other) triangular sight line of 100 feet at intersections with County roadways. • Floodplain There are no existing floodplains on Otter Crossing. • Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are proposed within the site where there is proposed storm sewer and stormwater management facilities, proposed watermain, and proposed sanitary sewer. The applicant is proposing to include Drainage and Utility easements over all of Outlot D and a portion of Outlot A. The comments below are based on the knowledge that the plat will be revised so that Outlots A, B, C, E and F, shall be platted as one outlot until time of future development. The applicant is dedicating a 60-ft right-of-way along Otter Lake Road. The southern 56 ft of the right-of-way being dedicated is 66-ft wide. Comments: 1. Applicant shall include a trail, drainage, and utility easement over the 8.5-ft wide trail along Otter Lake Road. 2. The drainage and utility easement over Basin 1 P must extend 10-ft beyond the HWL. See Comment 2 under the Grading section. • Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities will be covered under the City's Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement. The applicant will be required to have their own declaration for stormwater maintenance for the private storm sewer. • Permits Required 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed Permit Otter Crossing Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 8/6/2020 Page 6 6. Anoka County Right -of -Way Permit If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. Otter Crossing Engineering Review C Memo To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: 8/04/20 Re: Otter Crossing Environmental Comments RECOMMENDATIONS F Environmental The following recommendations were made by Lino Lakes Environmental Board and Environmental Coordinator on Wednesday, July 291h, 2020 for the Otter Crossing Preliminary Plat. 1. Canopy cover standards have not been met. More trees will be required. 2. Foundation landscape standards have not been met in terms of numbers or with respect to placement. More plants will be required. 3. Open space plantings will be required in the storm water pond area if this is intended to be a permanent feature. 4. Buffer screen will need to be added for the north perimeter. 5. Clarify areas to be seeded with MnDOT 25-141 or sodded. The Landscape Plan and Seeding Plan do not currently match. 6. The wetland does not appear to be in the Wetland Management Corridor. A wetland buffer of 10 feet would meet City ordinance. 7. Applicant may want to consider replacing Autumn Blaze maples with another suitable species due to the many structural problems that are common to Autumn Blaze. • Page 1 8. Recommend including some native shrub and herbaceous plant species in the landscapes. 9. Include a smart irrigation controller in the irrigation plan for the site. • Page 2 Otter Crossing Speculative Retail Development Main St (Co. Rd. 14) at Otter Lake Road July 17, 2020 Overview: A new multi -tenant, single story retail building on undeveloped property. Development Team: Developer/Owner: Architect: Civil / Landscape: Tyme Properties Edward Farr Architects Pioneer Engineering Retail Project At -A -Glance: Site Area, for Lot 1: 62,181 sq ft / 1.42 acres Zoning: GB —General Business Proposed Development: New 7,800 sq ft single story retail building, approx. 24 ft high. Proposed Parking: 71 Stalls. Land Development Overview: Tyme Properties owns approximately 30 acres of undeveloped land at the northeast quadrant of 1-35E and C.S.A.H. 14 (Main Street). The property is being subdivided into a series of Outlots, one Lot, and road R.O.W. per the proposed Preliminary Plat and as follows: - Lot 1 is being proposed as a new retail building development, called Otter Crossing. - 'Street A' will be built in Outlot D for access into Lot 1. - A regional storm water basin is proposed in the southwest corner of Outlot A, protected by a new Drainage and Utility Easement. - Right -Of -Ways are being dedicated for public purpose for Otter Lake Rd. and C.S.A.H. No. 14. Vehicular Access: The property is accessed from Otter Lake Road. A new road is proposed within Outlot D to provide direct access to Lot 1 and other future development sites. The intersection of Otter Lake Rd and Main Street has already been improved with traffic signals and turn lanes in anticipation of future development in this area. Retail Development Proposal: A new 7,800 square foot, single story retail building is proposed on Lot 1. This will be a multi -tenant building leased to typical small retail shops. The east end cap suite is proposed to have a drive-thru lane for a coffee shop or fast food restaurant user. Parking and Circulation: 71 parking stalls are proposed, more than the 45 minimum stalls required for general retail and fast food uses. A generous queueing lane and circular route is provided for the drive-thru lane without blocking parking stalls. Further, a couple of stalls can be dedicated in the northeast corner for drive-thru order waiting to keep the drive-thru lane moving quickly. A bike rack will be provided to encourage ridership. 1 Building Design: The building has a contemporary design using three colors of face brick, plus accent areas of EIFS, colored fabric awnings and metal sunscreen features. Energy efficient glass is in thermally broken aluminum storefront frames. The parapet wall of the building has been extended up vertically to naturally screen the rooftop HVAC units. The building will be of Type II-B, non-combustible construction, fully sprinklered, with Group M occupancies. Setbacks: The development complies with all parking setbacks and building setback requirements. Site and Building Signage: We are proposing one freestanding ground sign at the corner of Main Street and Otter Lake Rd.; and another ground sign at the driveway entrance off 'Street A'. Tenant wall signs will consist of internally illuminated signs on wiring raceways. Directional signage for internal circulation will be ground mounted metal signs on metal posts. Storm Water Utility: Lot 1 slopes from the southeast to the northwest, where catch basins are located to pick up the storm water and convey out to a new local storm sewer collection pipe under 'Street A'. Prior to 'Street A' being extended, the storm pipe will temporarily discharge into a swale that leads to the regional storm water basin in the southwest corner of the overall development. Storm water management will be significantly improved by this addition of the storm water treatment system for water quality and rate control, in compliance with local requirements. Sanitary Sewer Utility: Sewer service will be extended under 'Street A' from Otter Lake Rd. to serve new development sites. A service line will be brought in to serve Lot development as needed. Water Supply Utility: Water service will be extended under 'Street A' from Otter Lake Rd. to serve new development sites. Separate service lines will be brought into Lot 1 for domestic water supply and fire hydrant service as shown on the Utility Plan. Electric and Gas Utilities: Electric and gas services will be brought in by those service providers. Landscaping: A pleasing variety of overstory trees, plantings and ground cover will be provided on Lot 1 development to meet city standards. An automatic lawn irrigation system will be installed. Remaining disturbed areas on the Outlots will be seeded to prevent erosion. End of narrative 2 LO 0 CV C) CV rl- Otter Cross ing Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN DEVELOPER.- TYME PROPERTIES LLC 3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150 VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN - %: .c ,,.�_ �..� r• . - � � �- � rt . ARCHITECT- EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS 7710 GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PHONE: 952-943-9660 CONTACT: DON ANDERSEN -4 � r SOUTHWEST VIEW SOUTHEAST VIEW I. L CIVIL ENGINEER. - PIONEER ENGINEERING 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 PHONE: 651-681-1914 CONTACT: PAUL J. CHERNE LANDSCAPING: PIONEER ENGINEERING 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 PHONE: 651-681-1914 CONTACT: JENNIFER THOMPSON - -�� --7 A NORTHEAST VIEW 4r VICINITYMAP o. •—. —. 114(12 z ■�- � mA+ess aYIN logo Farnham Ave5. Unity Ave N Robin Ln 45. Rosemary WAY CJ 4 ¢ 46. Empress AVE N 1 ,113 _ . 13 18 HUGO 124 2 19 rSi N l G d� p SITE a m �' Y3�� e►h W r � - r Main $t Main St aln St n 118 Clear,ater l4l �, 1 Flan hymn �dN INV QQWMAMB ■ o an ar on n z 37. Elmsrest Aw nlI 38. Mercantile OR r� 39. 142nd St N 40. Cottonwood AVE SHEETINDEX AO TITLE SHEET 1-Ill 0.1 COVER SHEET 0.2 LEGEND 1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 RESOURCE INVENTORY 3.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 3.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 3.3 PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN 4.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4.2 SEEDING PLAN 5.1 GRADING DETAILS 6.1 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION 7.1 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 7.2 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 8.1 STREET CONSTRUCTION 9.1 WETLAND PLAN 10.1 CITY DETAILS 10.2 CITY DETAILS 10.3 CITY DETAILS 10.4tITY DETAILS L1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL Al ARCHITECTURAL SITE & SIGNAGE PLAN A2 FLOOR PLAN A3 ELEVATIONS SL-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SL-2 SITE LIGHT FIXTURES I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr Date Date Reg. No. 16362 Proiect Manager DLA ©COPYRIGHT 2020 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Tel: 952.943.9660 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 aim.edfarrarch.corn Client Proiect Otter Crossing Location Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN Issuer Date SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020 Sheet Title TITLE SHEET Proiect Number Sheet Number 20.001 AO OTTER CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLANS LINO LAKES, MINN S OTA P19NEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS — - — . 114 120 �e c i Zi Z y> T a i ¢ MPmss ay i L Q LU u r 42. Farnham Ave Z ■ 43. Unity Ave 44. N Robin Ln Q: M 45. Rosemary WAY LL 4 46. Empress AVE N L ■ LU i 3 � � ■ X 1i, 1 ■L13 _ — . 1_ 18 st N HUGO 124 2 19 i I 1 `m 6❑ $ i 4c1TC IJ m c0 �' Sefi a 1NA 1- T M � Main St Main St - Main St z 178 Clearyvater a� ! �h Northern gq French�a magR�M n Rd m (i 3 N L � D � spy J ■ 64 y 2 o �G 0< ■ m < age co 0 age�G Q o ■a �n Q o 7 z ar en Ln ■ 37. Elmcrest Ave NI 38. Mercantile DR N39. 142nd St N ■ 40. Cottonwood AV LOCATION MAP 0 37.5 75 150 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET INDEX 0.1 COVER SHEET 0.2 LEGEND 1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 RESOURCE INVENTORY 3.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 3.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 3.3 PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN 4.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4.2 SEEDING PLAN 5.1 GRADING DETAILS 6.1 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRRCTION 7.1-7.2 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 8.1 STREET CONSTRUCTION 9.1 WETLAND PLAN 10.1-10.4 CITY DETAILS L 1. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Know what's below. Call before you dig. 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-COVER 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. N LI€ °�57OF THE NW 1/4 OF NE�1/4 SEC. 24,1`tNP. 31 �GE. 22 N88''2t"&& n d 1198. ��. , o ^ �✓ ��� — NI I �' u - Fo r� �> CW 1 3 w WETLAND B w 1 ,Ld ( V� oLd f 60 NINE OF THE S 627 FT. OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4L0 35 I r d \ l V W J 1 1 I'\�— _ --� \ \ ^�WETLAND A �\,�, 0 j W LINE OF THE E 35 FT. OF - WETLAND NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 /41 Ld ri q -L OV SAP PEr J LI 60 ��• �/ /% I I I I \ J \ ` "Ql�TO . K TAKIV PROVISION PURSUANT' I 4" ���I I ` I C MFICA�E 538060.004 PER FyPIAL_ < L— I i �J ///(1 r II FTHE J I /I �I I � �� N JEOSOH 1 T FT. >_ r� I/ll< A / ill IA IT\/ L)I/ll Ivf rVy' I I I •r•�rlr OF if I� ISI �L' nr- rnrn\, �I nT nl/l �LINE E E 66 FT.\I�20 \\--r\vvrlI J 88023'21" 2�2.3�Q% WAY EA��MENT PER %TdLITY ASEMENTCJER_ S ANOKA COUN�Y�HIGHWAY �\ DOC.\�10 484213.�06 � /'rg_0.0_ �/4 �RIGHT—OF —WA�AT NO. W.So8 835 �R=13�5E 517."' Lo 175_89 nA l� vI/V\Ir<\n^ v\VlVIAIVITI \I/ LI)1/\I IT Vr �g$ �1 ' SGQgX �5'E ��0 9•7� C.S.A.H.<Nd- 14(MAIN STREET) �0 o3g 35 „-7 15p ol N 1 LINE OF THE NW __�' o ' " 69O/47 SE CORNER OF 4E W J� 1 ©/ OF THE NE 1/4 S8$ 56 41 W 690.47 �FT� 1 / 41 n n l/ll< ^ IT\/ L)I/.I IT nr- n \ I 1 /4= THE E� L4 _� -- I Li Q) II , P18NEERenginee7ing CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS _J I I I \ I C.S.A.H. NO 14 (MAIN STREET) I I r C.S.A.H. NO 14 (MAIN STREET) I r ' I I 0 w Y Q I J I w o— I r ' \ I I SECTION 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND Denotes concrete Denotes bituminous Denotes utility pole Denotes found iron pipe ® Denotes pk nail Denotes light pole �C? Denotes hydrant ® Denotes mailbox 0 Denotes restricted access oh Denotes overhead utility lines 9 Denotes underground gas line # Denotes fence (chain) ---->>—Denotes storm sewer line O Denotes sanitary or storm manhole ® Denotes catch basin beehive Denotes catch basin 0 Denotes flared end section Denotes sign sa Denotes Test hole EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) PROPOSED LEGAL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT PURPOSES ONLY: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly and Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 51 minutes 09 seconds East, along the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 118.28 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 12 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 143.13 feet; thence South 8 degrees 26 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 279.89 feet; thence Southerly along a non —tangential curve, concave to the East having a central angle of 22 degrees 32 minutes, a radius of 866.93 feet and an arc distance of 340.95 feet, the chord of said curve bears South 6 degrees 16 minutes 09 seconds East; thence South 17 degrees 32 minutes 09 seconds East and tangent to last described curve a distance of 357.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 431.60 feet; thence South 0 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 230.93 feet, to a point on the South line of said Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter, distant 690.47 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said line there terminating, Anoka County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: Parcels 10A, and IOB, Anoka County Highway Right —of —Way Plat No. 75. 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. EX-SURV- 118283-BASE.DWG V, f SO E PROPERTES Ill it � � rl�— c � � / � � � � � MAP UNIT HYDROLOGIC SOIL HYDRIC SOIL �/ � � � 1 � , � �'� \ � � J MAP UNIT NAME SYMBOL GROUP RATING Cb Cath ro muck B/D 100 Du Dundas loam B/D 95 Gc Glencoe loam B/D 95 s L � %l / �;,� �'' ` 11 Hayden f ' n e 1 � z; ���� _ --- ��., /�� / HdB sandy loam 2 to B 5 j Cb -�, f M6 percent slopes / 1 .� -� - _ r, f--�� — — — Nessel fine 1. : �- - -- - - -- — ---- ---- - - -- --- —p , —� _ z- 7,� NeA sandy o a m 1 t o C 7 t! '4 percent slopes E L It>I� �, r:n ^ - Y ��, �1� , ✓ Wb Webster Loam B/D 100 Wb y f \_ NeA le WETLAND I J � � , `, ,' •• I � \ WETLAND B OUTLOT A Du Du L Al go V e WbWETLAND (\ ( �` t/ ` 1 , ` '•, —\ A WETLAND A \A NeA WETLAND A 4 r 1 1LL1JWb EX. 100-YR HWL 910 0 Yr I ; , j � � � � J. �• � �//`� , ` � � � I, , �� -�, ��, ..3 ;max, �� . � y , .! �.. _ I Ali—_— .� = - - =v � '' %/ \ I I I/ �\ \\`.,U``'�r `,�' x"` ��! i . ` , '•\. \ I I �_.i — : , ''l— _ 1 — )/ I ► ( I, I I ,� N — - � u Ili L J� r: _ .s. ! f i�` F fl ` -•� I / � PICNEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-ENG-1 18283-SHEET-RES-INV 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. I I I I F P18NEERenginee7ing CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ZONING: R—BR RURAL/BUSINESS RESERVE FUTURE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL K In A /\ I \.L_.— I VVJ. Z_ ZONING: GB GENERAL BUSINESS FUTURE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL I <I LIJ C�\Y� <I 170 J l­- Li LIJ I (i ) L � ZONING: GB GENERAL BUSINESS FUTURE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL ZONING: LI LIGHT INDUSTIAL FUTURE LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL JI � I I \ I C.S.A.H. NO 14 (MAIN STREET) I I r V� / w I��\\< �� 0 ff)I wl ~I Q I— I In W z C.S.A.H. NO 14 (MAIN STREET) I I I I w Y < J h, w o- I r I I I J I I II I I SECTION 24, TWP. 31, RCE. 22 LOCATION MAP N OT TO SCALE 000Z0llo�y9IN1196Y67004101to] IE90100aN004901MAIIV_1mormNW:1IMall 0041o]69��e]IIW,I That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly and Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 51 minutes 09 seconds East, along the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 118.28 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 12 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 143.13 feet; thence South 8 degrees 26 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 279.89 feet; thence Southerly along a non —tangential curve, concave to the East having a central angle of 22 degrees 32 minutes, a radius of 866.93 feet and an arc distance of 340.95 feet, the chord of said curve bears South 6 degrees 16 minutes 09 seconds East; thence South 17 degrees 32 minutes 09 seconds East and tangent to last described curve a distance of 357.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 431.60 feet; thence South 0 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 230.93 feet, to a point on the South line of said Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter, distant 690.47 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said line there terminating, Anoka County, Minnesota. EXCEPT: Parcels 10A, and 10B, Anoka County Highway Right —of —Way Plat No. 75. EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) PROPOSED ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) FUTURE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL TOTAL GROSS AREA 29.61 ACRES TOTAL LOT AREA 1.43 ACRES TOTAL UPLAND LOT AREA 1.43 ACRES TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA 1.43 ACRES TOTAL WETLAND AREA 0.00 ACRES LOTS 1 NUMBER OF OUTLOTS 6 TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 25.86 ACRES TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY AREA OF OTTER LAKE ROAD 0.84 ACRES TOTAL C.S.A.H. NO. 14 1.48 ACRES 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 88 www.pioneereng.creng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 00-SURV- 118283-BASE.DWG P19NEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ZONING: GB -GENERAL BUSINESS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:20,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH:100 FT. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM STREETS PRINCIPAL BUILDING -LOCAL STREET 30' PRINCIPAL BUILDING -COLLECTOR 40' PARKING LOT/DRIVEWAY 15' PARKING SUMMARY HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 4 STANDARD PARKING STALLS 67 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 71 LOT 1 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS = 75% LOT LOT AREA = 1.43 AC MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS = 1.07 AC TOTAL IMPERVIOUS = 1.05 AC AREA (1.43 x 0.75) 0 10 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-ENG-I 18283-SHEET-SITE 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. —_ -- -- I v y PI CNEERen ineerin CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS i >h 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-EN G-118283-SHEET-PHASE 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. t1l I' �— —914— \\ OUTLOT/A WETLAND A 1- HWL=909.9 I I \ F C'V I \ I I I WETLAND A/ 1 Co ( 1 1 I I I I 00 CD 0 ohm oho -< \ ` ----\�- 0 c0 \� \ Y \ 0 / , i 9-1 PICNEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS / 6� I � p --- 8'1 PVC / A \ / LEGEND 00000000000 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 00000000000 INSTALL BEFORE START OF GRADING 00000000000 PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL FENCE. INSTALL BEFORE START OF GRADING SECONDARY EROSION CONTROL FENCE. TO BE INSTALLED 48 HOURS AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING. EROSION CONTROL AT BACK OF CURB. TO BE INSTALLED AFTER COMPLETION OF CURB CONSTRUCTION. SUMPED RIP RAP PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATER, INSTALL WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. MNDOT CAT 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. INSTALL WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION El TO BE INSTALLED BEFORE GRADING BEGINS. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION O TO BE INSTALLED AFTER 1ST LIFT OF BITUMINOUS. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION TO BE INSTALLED WITH CATCH BASIN GRATE. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS LOW OPENING HWL + 2' EOF + 1' 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-GRAD 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. SEEDING NOTES: USE TEMPORARY SEED MIX 22-111 FOR PONDS AND OPEN SPACE TO STABILIZE OUTSIDE OF NATIVE SEEDING DATES: \ I J MINNESOTA STATE SEED MIXTURE 22-111 ® 40 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT DOUBLE SEED RATE FOR DORMANT SEEDING AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. /1 0 MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 ® 2 TONS PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR �— —914— — \ 1 / APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED TO MINIMU, 90% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBED • TYPE 1 FERTILIZER, 10-10-20 ® 200 LBS. PER ACRE OU TLOT A ' OPEN SPACE AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITH MIX 35-621 (FORMERLY U6) OR EQUIVALENT + + + INFILTRATION BASINS AND POND ABOVE NWL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIX 33-261 OR EQUIVALENT. SEE GRADING PLANS FOR MORE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DETAILS \V i \< I \ \ r WETLAND A HWL=909.9 I I \+ \ I 1 \ 11 +cy+ ++ + ICI + + III + + I \ I I I WETLAND A/ 00 ( 1 1 I I I I 00 I I IIl/lI CD 0 =— L ohm ohof \ ` ----\�- o 0 \� c\ Y \ 0 / , i P19NEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I 8' P VC ® PERMANENT SEEDING AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITH MN MIX 25-141 / 6� 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-GRAD 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. a I WETLAND A /f HYDRANT 8"X6"TEE W/6"GV 9'-6"DIP CL52 \ _ GND. ELEV.=917.8 — - - - — I - ---------------- STA:3+17.8 - - - — ----------- ------------------------- -------------- EX —STUB- 6000 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — STUB-1W 8— —----MH-1------ --- --"X6 —"TEE 0+52.82 +32.31 2+67.81 ° STREET A PRIVATE 8"X6"TEE oTLOT D - Q OU / 8" PVC C�00 WM //BASIN 1P �'` ,� �il 6+50 6+00 5+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 -- 1 « --- ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ----------- - - - _-_ - ------------------------------------------ - — — — — — — — — -------- --------__ OVC C900 WM 0 SERVICE PIPE � I WETLAND A � " scH . ` SERVICE PIPE i we] 925 920 915 A OU TLOT E 0 I TA:9+ 0 6'-45 END OU TLOT FCL to HYDRANT W/6"GV _ GND. ELEV.=919.4 I � I 6"-45'BEND o ' I LOT 1 U� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------- - - __=­ _i� ------------------------------------------ lq- N STREET A (PRIVATE) w 00 00 0000 0000 cy)c6 od00 N co m 00 H �rn00ZO _ �>> m Z Z PROPOSED GRADE HYDRANT W/6"GV GND. ELEV.=918.1 � w I 00 00 00 O co00� CD Q0 0 0) 00 ��co 00 X�� .. ..� LLJ CN z o >>> :5wmmz zz Z I II :2; II 0 ;n EXISTING II GROUND II �' �00 WM � j DP zX 8 \NM X — _ � [!!L CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" D.I.P. WM CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION & ELEVATION m 00 CONNECT TO EXISTING > > J SANITARY SEWER Vj z w M CONTRACTOR TO U) ± FIELD VERIFY 900 w Q LOCATION & ELEVATION .� OiEn 4+50 PIONEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 65' 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 215' 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% MH—EX-6C 0+15.11 �I -^ S" DIP WIV 1. TRACER WIRE REQUIRED ON ALL NON-CONDUCTIVE MAINLINE PIPE, LATERALS, SERVICES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, STUBS, UTILITY LOCATION BOXES AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE PVC C900 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL FITTINGS SHALL MEET AWWA C153 REQUIRMENTS. 3. TRACER WIRE REQUIRED ON ALL NON-CONDUCTIVE PIPE PER CITY SPEC. 4. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. SERVICE NOTES: 1. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYES ARE STATIONED FROM DOWN STREAM MANHOLES. 2. SANITARY SEWER INVERTS ARE SHOWN AT THE CURB STOP. 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ti I 925 920 915 A I 900 — — --LTJ EX. 38' 8" PVC SDR 26 895 @ 0.40% 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 —0+50 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-SSWR 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com @ 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. we] 925 920 915 A OU TLOT E 0 I TA:9+ 0 6'-45 END OU TLOT FCL to HYDRANT W/6"GV _ GND. ELEV.=919.4 I � I 6"-45'BEND o ' I LOT 1 U� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------- - - __=­ _i� ------------------------------------------ lq- N STREET A (PRIVATE) w 00 00 0000 0000 cy)c6 od00 N co m 00 H �rn00ZO _ �>> m Z Z PROPOSED GRADE HYDRANT W/6"GV GND. ELEV.=918.1 � w I 00 00 00 O co00� CD Q0 0 0) 00 ��co 00 X�� .. ..� LLJ CN z o >>> :5wmmz zz Z I II :2; II 0 ;n EXISTING II GROUND II �' �00 WM � j DP zX 8 \NM X — _ � [!!L CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" D.I.P. WM CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION & ELEVATION m 00 CONNECT TO EXISTING > > J SANITARY SEWER Vj z w M CONTRACTOR TO U) ± FIELD VERIFY 900 w Q LOCATION & ELEVATION .� OiEn 4+50 PIONEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 65' 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% 215' 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.40% MH—EX-6C 0+15.11 �I -^ S" DIP WIV 1. TRACER WIRE REQUIRED ON ALL NON-CONDUCTIVE MAINLINE PIPE, LATERALS, SERVICES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, STUBS, UTILITY LOCATION BOXES AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE PVC C900 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL FITTINGS SHALL MEET AWWA C153 REQUIRMENTS. 3. TRACER WIRE REQUIRED ON ALL NON-CONDUCTIVE PIPE PER CITY SPEC. 4. WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. SERVICE NOTES: 1. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYES ARE STATIONED FROM DOWN STREAM MANHOLES. 2. SANITARY SEWER INVERTS ARE SHOWN AT THE CURB STOP. 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ti I 925 920 915 A I 900 — — --LTJ EX. 38' 8" PVC SDR 26 895 @ 0.40% 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 —0+50 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-SSWR 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com @ 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. GRATE PER CIT" STANDARD DETA HWL:912.5 � �6"� 48" � ELEV: 6„ 912.1 INV: 911.1 INV:908. fill INV:908.0 15" RCP ;n 15" RCP OUTLET EL: 907.0 INLET PIPE 0 • e • e e • d• 6" D.T. INV:908.0 PRECAST CONCRETE SLAB BASE POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE OCS-100 (NOT TO SCALE) 930 925 915 r•,'y P19NEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS WETLAND A 15" F.E.S. 2.9 C.Y.— CLAII RIP RAP W/GEOTEXTILE FILTER BLANKET TIE LAST 3 JOINTS 0 0 0 \I 6" D.T., \�\ WETLAND A ,f — — INV=908.0 1 / 6 D.T. INV=908.0 F CB-121 I ------ -- 4" D.T. C.O.--------j1+01 _ �-/ 4" D.T. C.O. 0 3+07.81 STREET A PRIVATE / o OU TLOT D BASIN 1 Piq 6+50 6+00 5+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 1 00 FES-100A C6MH-103 / \ \ — — — 4" D.T. --- OCS-100 ---------------------------------------------------- -- ---- ------ -- ---- ---- ------ / FES-101 3+42.81 CBMH-102 i CBMH-7 141 3+07.81 � FES-100B OU TLOT E OU TLOT F ; - WETLAND A CBMH-131 • I 4" D.T. C.O. I r I FES—EX-1 INV:907.62 I EX. 258' — 24" RCP CL3 @ 0.19% El __ ck� � � 4" D.T. C.O. LOT 1 , I 1 I I I I - — —----------------------------------------- -----_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ----------------- — — - ----- CB-133 ---------------- 4" D.T. C.O. oh oh oh oh oh oh o oh —oh —oh —oh— h W N Z _I r O O O coo O CO (U) C NLo _I 0) —0 > > O EMZZ p 18" F.E.S. Q 0) W/ TRASH GUARD, 0 � 3.6 C.Y.— CLAII j O RIP RAP W/GEOTEXTILE w > FILTER BLANKET Z TIE LAST 3 JOINTS BASIN 1P 24' --/ 15" RCP CL5 20' @ 0.84% 15" RCP CL5 @ 0.00% 15" F.E.S. TIE LAST 3 JOINTS N O m U cn z Ld _I I I 100 00 N In r r r r rN0 7 rorN O N r7 N p� N (D r r I�00) 0)(3)I— �L6Z Z Zo 'E»» 1Kmz z zz PROPOSED GRADE 20 ' » „ �� �_15 CP CL5 18 RCP CL5 @ 0.35% @ 0.40% �z EXISTING 1 GROUND X — 23' 12 RCP CL5 12" RCP CL5 @ 0.85% @ 0.45% U :2z 3::_1 X PM I RELOCATE EXISTING CATCH BASIN 5 TO NEW CURB LOCATION & EXTEND EX. 15" RCP 5" 4" D.T. 4" D.T. C.O. j II I I I � I I I I I I I I I 4" D.T. C.O. I I I I I I I I l I U w 1 z N _I CV 1 1 i() r N N r rr4l) r r N 00 p �0) n� = O > > 'Z OPOSED ADE `—EXISTING — 26' GROUND 12" RCP CL5 @ 0.45% c� �z 3: T X zz z U) l X STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME TYPE STRUCTURE SIZE NEENAH CASTING OR EQUAL NOTES 100 OCS 48" DIA. SPECIAL 102 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 103 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 104 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 105 CBMH 48" DIA. R-4342 111 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 1 121 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 1 131 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 132 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 133 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 141 1 CBMH i 48" DIA. R-3067 V STORM STRUCTURE TABLE NOTES: 1. WATER TIGHT STRUCTURES A. STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN INTEGRAL BASE B. PIPE CONNECTION TO STRUCTURE WITH PRESS —SEAL WATER STOP GROUT RING OR APPROVED EQUAL. C. PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF WATERMAIN WILL BE TONGUE AND GROOVE WITH A HAMILTON KENT SUPERSEAL GASKET OR APPROVED EQUAL MEETING ASTM-443 D. ALL MH JOINTS WILL BE TONGUE AND GROOVE WITH A HAMILTON KENT SUPERSEAL GASKET OR APPROVED EQUAL MEETING ASTM-443. 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 930 925 915 r•,'y 00-ENG- 118283-SHEET-STRM 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 930 ' z N N Z L'i_1 N w=1 p I I I ap OONII)� o� Lr)N 925 '' ���� ��'o Cn I'7 O N (.0cfl N� f) I� N ap I- - N 04 ��~ N p N Vi N OS ON(p� �� N C O pry �rn � p O —� 0 0 0 0 H =mL6Z Z Zpp �� 0-) H =mLoZ zp U�mZ�Z Z ZZmEZ UEm--—m--- ZZmUY-J920 915 26' 12" RCP CL5 01t�l 0 Z Z N I x i•� PICNEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 24" RCP CL3 @ 0.19% PROPOSED GRADE 184' 62' '15" RCP CL5 —18"#RCP =-5— @ 0.40% @ 0.40% EXISTING GROUND 0— -� RELOCATE EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO NEW CURB LOCATION & EXTEND EX. 15" RCP N/ F- 1'I STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME TYPE STRUCTURE SIZE NEENAH CASTING OR EQUAL NOTES 100 OCS 48" DIA. SPECIAL 102 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 103 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 104 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 105 CBMH 48" DIA. R-4342 111 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 1 121 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 1 131 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 132 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V 133 CB 36"X24" R-3067 V 141 CBMH 48" DIA. R-3067 V STORM STRUCTURE TABLE NOTES: 1. WATER TIGHT STRUCTURES A. STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN INTEGRAL BASE B. PIPE CONNECTION TO STRUCTURE WITH PRESS —SEAL WATER STOP GROUT RING OR APPROVED EQUAL. C. PIPE JOINTS WITHIN 10' OF WATERMAIN WILL BE TONGUE AND GROOVE WITH A HAMILTON KENT SUPERSEAL GASKET OR APPROVED EQUAL MEETING ASTM-443 D. ALL MH JOINTS WILL BE TONGUE AND GROOVE WITH A HAMILTON KENT SUPERSEAL GASKET OR APPROVED EQUAL MEETING ASTM-443. 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 930 z � `I 1 Ld Z 1 pp N Q W W wl N if) N U I - I r 0') O w LO U-) �p O co ��LO � oN 925 00� NO n0O �2 O oLO O cfl r7 v-p O O nm�H —Z Z LO H p�O 0�` 2rn O p r7 — O IOn00 CO nLO co 0�� D �I 0)LOO m�m»> > X-MmXo�� FN oO��J� C 0� EmZ ZZ mZ O w O » � m PROPOSED j mz zmzz 920 GRADE II II 915 90' -----u 18 12" RCP CL5 12" RCP CL5 RELOCATE & ADJUST 11' EXISTING CATCH BASIN 15" RCP CL5 EX. 54' @ 0.60% ��,�5% & EXTEND STORM SEWER @ 1.07% 15" RCP CL5 1.07% 910 3: Z EXISTING 1 GROUND �CD �Iz SIX x ZU z Ni x i•� 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-STRM 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 50' OUTLOT 11' 28' B—B 11' 14' 14' 2.0% 4" TOPSOIL & SODJ SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL 930 925 r• , 915 910 r• • PICNEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2.0% INSET A 2.0% B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSET A 1.5" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) SPEC 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) 28' B—B PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL SECTION (N.T.S.) PARKING LOT SECTION 1.5" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 NEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) SPEC 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 12.5 LION WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C) 3" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) 2.0% 6" 1--4" TOPSOIL & SOD JRN LANE SECTION i" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 ARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) EC 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 12.5 IN WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C) AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW OTEXTILE FABRIC (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) 2— BAR OU TLOT D 4+00 3+05.31 ------------- 17.69 - ----------2+87.63 — OU TLOT F --------------------------- oh o oh oh It � 00 00 00 PVI STA: 2+44.00 PVI ELEV: 917.97 K: 99.48 LVC: 100.00 3+ 50 0 O O + N > Q- ., cnor HIGH PT. STA: 2+43.79 HIGH PT ELEV: 917.850 O N 't O + O J i W a_ N 0) J W 3+00 2+50 2+00 STREET A NO PVI STA: 0+82.07 PVI ELEV: 917.16 K: 6 0.7 6 LVC: 100.00 n c ., n. 1 +50 LOW PT. STA: 1 +01.66 LOW PT ELEV: 917.34. O It 04 n O O W 0- 1 +00 0+50 J W REMOVE 320 SY EXISTING BITUINOUS r-I� ----<I--�—� I A I I RELOCATE ELECTRIC & TELEPHO N„ TO EASMENT (BY OTHERS) REMOVE 350 LF EXISTING CURB & GUTTER SAWCUT 380LF BITUMINOUS REMOVE EXISTING THROUGH & TURN ARROWS AND REPLACE WITH THROUGH ARROW oh � I V CURB LEGEND 08.32 = GUTTER LINE ELEVATION FOR B618 & B612 CURB 07.82 = BITUMINOUS ELEVATION = B612 CURB & GUTTER = B618 CURB & GUTTER = BITUMINOUS EDGE 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 06 930 0 0 00 O- 0 00 II rn Q II H J (n W —0+50 925 r• , 915 910 r• • 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-ROAD 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. --914— ^ TLO- 5- Ile /10.00 \\\QA I I I I I J 1,670 SF WETLAND � I I I Ilr IIIII �. ' OV B 0{ EXCAVATION -\ 1 � \ LO \ \ N 0 / 1 I �— -�4-- -- -- GA-- PICNEERengineering CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS i I � I > i /(,N' N V I I I I �--7 o f /,- —922 v ( �� / \9 �O a r---920-- — �—'�— �= 9 -7T /�—---924----- I / —926— WETLAND EXCAVATION (1,670 SF) WETLAND IMPACT (3,600 SF) WETLAND BUFFER MINIMUM REQ'D — — WETLAND BUFFER AVG REQ'D (0.560 AC) LJ WETLAND BUFFER PROPOSED (0.706 AC) 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00-ENG-118283-SHEET-WETLAND 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com © 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. CP 1 I I I v � 916 —L— _7- 7fI J � > > > > > KF � — SDD-14 )OD _ 0 , SSC-3 19.04 Er - N___ / 18.28 / x GFS-16 OD F L— — I I 18.66 x 18.37 x WLC-10 1 � KL-9 t °I I I I c c d ° Al ° ° d 4 ° ° d ° ° ° ° 4 / ° d d O ti 14 ° ° d ° C> °° ° O iol 18.66 — / x /x ilV V 10 KF 10 18.0,e \ K F 17 56 — �VLC-13 SOD16 l \ 9 8 \ \\ \ x 17.88 \ � 1 i NFS-15 TWN-1 —oh—oh—oh �Qh oh —oh —oh —oh ah -/ 918 SOD V PI�NEERerg ineerin CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS WLC-1 18.63 KF-4.G 70 SOD 1$ I I I I -- -I---I�----I-�-I-----I----- I JTL 1 ; � I I I I KF-6 I I I I I i I SDD-12 �I NFS —13 \-- —-- i I I S � i I I I I I I I I I —� WN-13 I I I I I I I I � I )--NFS-15 I I Go Q I I I I I I I I v I I I rn II I I S D I I I I � I I I WN-13 I I I I I I j v I I I I I I I NFS-5— I I AST— 24� I SOD v I I I J TL — 2 WN-7 NFS-15 � I / �� / hyd i I oh —oh—oh— _ -- oh oh fo o T o fo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 40% OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE COVERAGE WITH CANOPY. VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: APPROX. 34,276 SQ FT 40% REQUIREMENT=13,710 SQ FT PROPOSED=9,150 SQ FT (8,400 OVERSTORY AND 750 ORNAMENTAL) 20 TREES PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND RIGHT OF WAY. CREATE A CONTINUOUS SCREEN AT A HEIGHT OF 30". DOUBLE ROW OF PLANTS WITH TRIANGULATED SPACING. NOTES: 1. PERENNIAL AREAS TO BE AMENDED WITH COMPOST/PLANTING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 6" 2. PLANTING BEDS THAT ABUT SOD SHALL BE EDGED WITH STEEL EDGER 3. PLANTING BEDS TO BE MULCHED WITH 1.25-1.5" RIVER ROCK TO A DEPTH OF 3" 4. RIVER ROCK LAID OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER 5. SODDED AREAS AS NOTED ON PLAN TO BE IRRIGATED. 6. SOD USED BETWEEN PLANTING BEDS AND ADJACENT STREET CURBS. 7. IRRIGATION DESIGNED BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE NOTES PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ROOT QUANTITY OVERSTORY TREES THORNLESS HONEYLOCUST/GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR INEMIS 2.5" B&B 4 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE/ACER X FREEMANII 2.5" B&B 6 SENTRY LINDEN/TILIA AMERICANA 'SENTRY 2.5" B&B 4 ORNAMENTAL TREES JTL JAPANESE TREE LILAC/SYRINGA RETICULATA #3 POT 3 SSC SPRING SNOW CRAB/MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' #3 POT 3 SHRUBS NFS NEON FLASH SPIREA/SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'NEON FLASH' #3 POT 63 TWN TINY WINE NINEBARK/PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS 'SMPOTW #3 POT 52 GFS GOLDFLAME SPIREA/SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'GOLDFLAME' #3 POT 16 DKL DWARF KOREAN LILAC/SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN' #3 POT 9 EMH EMERALD MOUND HONEYSUCKLE/LONICERA XYLOSTEUM 'E.M.' #3 POT 11 RPW RED PRINCE WEIGELA/WEIGELA FLORIDA 'RED PRINCE' #3 POT 5 JWS JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA/SPIRAEA ALBIFLORA #3 POT 18 PERENNIALS SDD STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY/HEMORCALIS 'STELLA D'ORO' #1 POT 31 AST FANAL ASTILBE/ASTILBE ARENDSII 'FANAL' #1 POT 50 KF KARL FOERSTER GRASS/CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'K.F.' #1 POT 35 WLC WALKERS LOW CATMINT/NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKERS LOW #1 POT 41 - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE PROJECT SITE TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF PROPOSED PHYSICAL START DATE AT LEAST 7 DAYS IN ADVANCE. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ON THE PROJECT SITE WITH GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1-800-252-1166 PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. - GRADING TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. - NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. - ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN-AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. - ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL TO BE GROWN IN THE CONTAINER A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) MONTHS PRIOR TO PLANTING ON SITE. - DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL NOT BE STAKED, BUT THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST GUARANTEE STANDABILITY TO A WIND SPEED OF 60 M.P.H. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM GUARANTEE OF ONE YEAR ONE TIME REPLACEMENT ON NEW PLANT MATERIALS. GUARANTEE SHALL BE AGREED UPON BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. - THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER INSTALLATION. - IF THERE IS A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST, THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. -THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE. - COMMERCIAL GRADE POLY LAWN EDGING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NOTED. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE CAUSED BY THE PLANTING OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS CLEAN UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. - STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 0 10 20 40 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES a PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. o BACKFILL SOIL. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND a WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED o gyp° o AND FILL VOIDS. TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A ° o LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. ,, WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF o INSTALLATION. WATERING SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED ;" o °• o MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY a a o THOROUGHLY SATURATE COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL. ROOT BALL AND PLANTING INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT HOLE. FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" __— I I- ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. -1 —_—_—PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 I I —III —III I I I I -I I=1 HOURS OF THE SECOND REMOVE PLASTIC, METAL, I —I I —I I I I—� WATERING UNLESS SOIL 1 WOOD OR FIBER CONTAINER =III —III -I _ I I -I I MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS WITH SHARP KNIFE. —III-I I —III—III—III—III—III-I I III—� I SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MAX. PLANTS CAN BE PLANTED IN 1—III I IT I ITT—TI I ITT—TI I ITT—TI I ITT—TI I I -I ITT—�I I I- 3" DEEP (DO NOT PLACE A DEGRADABLE POT, THE =III=III=III=III=III= III= MULCH AGAINST STEM OF CONTAINER MUST BE SLIT SHRUB). VERTICALLY AT 6" INTERVALS. 2-3 TIMES BALL DIAMETER DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL p p44 p 4 o TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND a WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED p p FILL VOIDS. TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A ° o LEADER. DO NOT PAINT p 4 WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF CUTS. p 4 p INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST p 4 a °p p BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SET PLANT ON p p SATURATE ROOT BALL AND UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL p o PLANTING HOLE. OR THOROUGHLY o p ° PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO op p p 4 4 ° 4 4 OF THE SECOND WATERING THE ROOT FLARE IS AT p 4yp UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE as o 4 apo EXCESSIVE. FINISHED GRADE. 4 SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MIN. 3" PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING ppp o� DEEP (DO NOT PLACE MULCH HOLE WITH BURLAP AND AGAINST TRUNK OF TREE). WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. BACKFILL WITHIN PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BACKFILL SOIL. BREAK DOWN THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, SIDES OF HOLE WHEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE BACKFILLING. TOP )j OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS I III -I I —I III —I I —I GREATER. REMOVE ALL II BURLAP AND NAILS FROM 1 �r II TOP OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. III I I=III-I III— I I I II TTT TTT�TT TTT�TT TTT _T I =1 I -I I -III -I I -III -III -I I �I I I II SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO ;1I�I1 IIII�I PLANTING. IIIIIIIIIII�II�IIIII�III�III 2-3 TIMES BALL DIAMETER 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com 2 Al m co 0 N O N O N ti MM OTTER CROSSING TENANT NAME CV " T TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME - TENANT NAME TENANT NAME _ _ TENANT NAME 01, 010 GROUND SIGN S-1 (S-2 SIM. Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" GROUND SIGN S-3 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" BUILDING TENANT SIGNAGE Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" ---- DEVELOPMENT NAME - LIGHT TAN FACE BRICK. -- INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED METAL SIGN BOX. DOUBLE SIDED. SIGNAGE AREA 200 sf MAXIMUM -- BUILDING ADDRESS (TBD) - DARK GRAY FACE BRICK DEVELOPMENT JAM E TRASH GROUND SIGN S-3 5' MIN. OFF P.L. NTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN BOX. DOUBLE SIDED. SIGN AREA ?00 sf MAXIMUM \NCHOR TENANT SIGNAGE. 3UILDING ADDRESS (TBD) a RAY FACE BRICK BRICK or EIFS. SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED TENANT SIGNAGE. 100 sf MAXIMUM ELECTRICAL RACEWAY TO MATCH BUILDING FINISH PARKING CALCULATION RETAIL 4,800 / 1 per 200 = 24 FAST FOOD 1,000 (dining area - est.) / 15 per 1,000 = 15 1 per EMPLOYEE (est) = 6 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED = 45 TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 71 OUTDO( SEATIf LIGHT PO ARCHITECTURAL SITE and SIGNAGE PLAN Scale: 1" = 20'-0" MAIN STREET CR #14 P.L. 0 Q O W Q J W O N (1) 0' 10' 20' 40' I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr Date Date Reg. No. 16362 Proiect Manager DLA ©COPYRIGHT 2020 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Tel: 952.943.9660 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 wwwedfarrarch.carn Client Proiect Otter Crossing Location Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN Issuer Date SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020 Sheet Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE and SIGNAGE PLAN Proiect Number Sheet Number 20.001 Al FACE BRICK/ 8" CMU i p A3 LIGHTING POLE A3 e CONCRETE T a APRON TRANSFORMER as ° o o TRA►SH,: ENCLOSU.: E' a Q, ' BUILDIN SETBACK 1 y' 2 3 4 5 6 7 DIRECTIONAL 130'-0" 20'-nil 20'-nil 20'-nil 20'-nil 20'-nil 30'-nil ZDIUNAUt LFDC I.. GAS AMETERS , q 41 LIGHT POLE UTILITY SEATING AREA 00 N C6 ch ti O N O N O N ti 1 FLOOR 1 A2 ,, Scale: 1 /8" = 1'-0" DRIVE—THRU BY —PAS aI AISLE LANE LIGHT POLE I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr Date Date Reg. No. 16362 Proiect Manager DLA ©COPYRIGHT 2020 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Tel: 952.943.9660 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 wwwedfarrarch.carn ient oiect fitter Crossing Location Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN Issuer Date SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020 Sheet Title FLOOR PLAN Proiect Number Sheet Number monow- 20.001 A2 jk-!IWALL 123'-8" T/WALL _ 121' - 0" FLOOR 1 100'-0" T T I T //,@ T f ELEVATION SOUTH Scale: 1 /8" = V-0" T/WALL 123'-8" oL T/WALL 121'-0" C FLOOR 1 -100' = 0"- 3 A3 5 A3 00 ti co ti 0 N 0 N O N ti ELEVATION NORTH Scale: 1/8" = V-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOFTOP SCREENING Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" PAINTED 8" TUBE POST. GATE HINGE PAINTED METAL DECK SWING GATE. 100% OPACITY DECK/INSUL - BAR JOIST m TRASH ENCLOSURE BACK Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOFTOP MECHANICAL o in 0 r N 7 A3 00 N ELEVATION WEST Scale: 1 /8" = 1'-0" Q � Q ELEVATION EAST Scale: 1 /8" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE Scale: 1 /4" = 1'-0" MATERIALS LEGEND DARK GRAY UTILITY BRICK BROWN UTILITY BRICK f LIGHT TAN UTILITY BRICK LIGHT GRAY EIFS MEDIUM GRAY EIFS . DARK BRONZE EIFS TEAL EIFS U 1 yl10I�Z�����1 ELEVATION NOTES A TENANT SIGN B ENTRY ACCESS LIGHTING C DARK BRONZE METAL CANOPY D FABRIC AWNING E ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR F 1" LOW E CLEAR GLASS IN ANODIZED ALUMINUM THERMAL BREAK FRAME G INSULATED HOLLOW METAL DOCK DOORS, PAINTED H PRE -FINISHED METAL THRU-WALL SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT 1 6" PROTECTIVE PIPE BOLLARD, PAINT J WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURE K FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION L FIRE DEPARTMENT ALARM / STROBE M GAS METER/SERVICE, PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT SPACE N NOTUSED P PRE -FINISHED METAL COPING WALL AREA TOTAL AREA BRICK GLASS EIFS HM DOORS SOUTH 2,889 sf 55% 31 % 14% - NORTH 2,730 sf 53% - 47% .05% EAST 1,318 sf 60% 14% 26% - WEST 1,342 sf 66% 15% 19% - I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr Date Date Reg. No. 16362 Proiect Manager DLA ©COPYRIGHT 2020 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Tel: 952.943.9660 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 wwwedfarrarch.carn Client Proiect Otter Crossing Location Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN Issuer Date SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/13/2020 Sheet Title ELEVATIONS Proiect Number Sheet Number 20.001 A3 U.0 UA UA U.0 UA U.0 U.G U.0 UA UA GA UA UA U.0 U.0 U.0 U.0 U.1 U.1 U.1 U.1 U.I U.1 U.2 We U:2 U.2 U.2 U.d UA U.3 U.2 [1.2 U.1 U.2 U.1 U.1 U.I U.I U.I U.I U.1 U.'2 U.2 U.2 U.3 U.3 U.4 {U.4 UA U.4 UA U.3 U.3 U.3 U.2 U.2 U.2 U.2 U.'1 U.'L We U.'L U.I U.I U.1 UA UA UA U.0 U.0 U.0 U.0 UA GA UA UA U.0 U.0 U.0 0.0 ._ n❑ ao 0A OA OA 3.0 OA bA bA b.D O.0 OA O.D OA 0.0 O.i 6.1 2" 0.1 0.1 02 02 0.2 0.2 b3 03 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 b2 0.2 02 0.1 O.f O.S 0.1 0.1 b.2 0.2 02 0.3 0.4 0.4 5 q,A,� OS 0 OS 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 03 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 02 0.2 0.1 O.i 0.1 OA bA 0.0 OA OA OA OA OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA OA ° d J° 0.0 0.o OA o.0 b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '_.: ' A OA o.0 4A 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1 .1 0.1 02 ° d 5.2 V° b3 0 bA OA 0 ., ., ' .D ao bA 0A OA on bA oA 0.0 ao T� R PROPERTY LINE 0.0 0A 0A oA O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0A OA O.D 0A 0.0 D.1 _ 0.1 0-1 b.l 0.1 0 02 2 0.3 0.3 A 0.5 0.5 as 03 0.3 0.2 0.2�0.2' I' 10. 2 0- 3 0. o-a 0.5 0.7 0.8 a4 0.9 08 0.7 oh 0.5 0.5 •� S ,.?.0 a0 OA bA o.D bA O.D 0.0 a0 ° d 0-0 0-o 0-0 0A O-0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0-0 OA 0A 0-0 OA 0-0 0,1 0.1 0-1 0-1 Os 2'+ •nn 0-1 0-1 0-1 0.k O.D OA O.o D-o OA OA 0A 0.0 0-0 pA O-0 0-0 0A OA 0.0 0-Q pA 0-❑ OA OA 0-1 b-I 0,1 0,1 0,1 02 02 03 b-3 OA .5 0-6 G-6 Q- -8 •.9 0-8 0-7 0-6 0- - 0.5 ❑.5 0-5 - - S 19.6•� 0.7 b,8 •I,0 13 •I-d 1-d 13 1A 0-P 0.8 0.8 0-9 0-9 b-9 - 0.9 0.8 0-6 0-4 03 02 0-1 0-1 p,t `01. p-❑ 0- OA 0A OA OA O.p 0.0 0-❑ n_ 1 .5 _ OA OA a❑ OA OA 0.0 O.0 OA OA 0.1 0.1 al al 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0-3 0-d .5 0.6 0.7 - •. v. 1.2 1.3 lA 1.3 1.2-j-0-----• 0 0.9 0.9 �.P •1_I.1.2.x 1.4 •1.6 __Ip •Y�' •I-5 1-3 •12 #Il1�f r •1 �'-Y•i 0 +a r+.1''•^ -- -' - 0.3 .2 02 CA S ❑.} 0.1 UA ❑A DA ❑.0 ❑.0 On �- a o .• •! • • • • • • • ---a" 0.0 OA OA OA UA ❑.G ❑.G 0.0 0.1 0.! G.1 0.1 ❑.I ❑2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0-5 0-6 O.$• L1 1.3 1.6 .._lam- iw 2A 2.2 2:3 2.2 iI-----1.7._ 1-d 1.hw..W�1L 1,5 1.4 1.3 1.3 !A 1-5 1-6 1.7 L9 2.�1 :-12.3 r25 d• - 2.❑ 1.9 1.8 •1 l'I 'i.l 0.8 0.6 0-d 03 0 al 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 , A 0A 0A 0A 0.0 0.0 0A BB ._ 2- - - - - y ao bo 0A OA 0A 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.l 03 02 0.3 0.4 OS 0.7 0.8 1,1 1 lh 23 2.7 3.0 'U 3A 37 3.9 3.7 '.d 3.1 .d 2.3 \--,1.9 1.8 1.8 13 2.0 2.2 2.5 2A 3,8, : d2 4 43 3.9 3. 2yt `� 2.3 2 2.1 2.0 18 1. 1.3 O 0.7 S .4 0.2 02 b.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D.1 0.1 OA OA 0.0 O.D OA 'y • �• 0.0 0A 0A OA 0A O.D 0.a 0.1 0.1 b.! 0.7 0.1 b.2 0.3 0.3 0. O.d b.8 i.1 1A 1.7 2.i .5 3.0 3.d 4.1 4.d 5 5.7Rt1 f1� 5.3 4. 4A 3.5, 3.0 2. 2.4 3 22 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.9 4. 5. .6 .9 5.8 5-3 4.6 '�T 3.0 2. 2.d 2.4 2. 2.2 �'13. 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.0 u� '', H:$ �11 WAIT\ WAIT 0.0 0A OA oA O.D 0.0 0.a 0.1 a1 b.i 0.I o2 0.2 0.3 0.4 55 0.7 lA i3 1.7 2.1 2.5 D 3.d 4,a 5.1 5.d 53 5:� 7.D 6.a 5 4.4 '+i 3.7 33 3.D ?. 2.6 2. 3A 3 3.7 4.a 4,9 S.d 5.8 5-9 .5 4.9 a,4 4 1 3.6 33 3.1 3-t 4� 2STA 1.9 1,5 1, 0.7 055 03 0.2 022 02 01 51 i b.l 0.1 OA 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 OA bA 0A 0.0 0.a 0.1 5.1 5.1 0.1 O.i 02 0.2 0.3 0.4 /,,. idd 0.8 l.i 1.5 1 2A 2.9 .4 4.0 4,7 S.a 62 •7A 7, 8.a 7.B 6,y 5S 4.s �,t42 3.9 3.6 3.a 3.3 3.3 3.a 3- 3.9 4; 4,9 5.6 S.d 5. 4,8 d 4,1 :9 3.8 3.7 3-6 3-7 3S 33 2. 2. 1�8 s` 1,3 0,9 0A OS 02 02 0.2 5.1 .I 0.1 O.I 0.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 V J �a pA O-0 0-0 0A 0-0 O.G 0,1 p,1 0.1 0-1 0-1 02 b3 0-3 0 0-6 0- 12 - 1-6 - +2A 2S - 3.0 .7 - 4-3 - S-p - SA d-d 4 _ 8.0 - -'.1 �I-7� 6-9 - 6A - 52 - d$ - 4A - 4.2 3.9 3-7 3-7 - 3-8 _ aA - 42 4S - 4,7 - 5-0 - 52 = 5-3 - 52 5-0 - 4-6 42 4.2 4.2 �.2 3_. � 4s 4.2 4A 3 2.9 I-6 ❑ OS 0A 03 0.3 02 p2 0.1 p-I 0-E 0-1 p-I 0,} 0.0 0-0 - - - - - j 0-0 ail) 0A 0A OA O.0 O-1 0.1 0-1 O-! 0-I 02 03 O.4 0 0-7 0-9 12 1-6 2A 2S 3.1 3.8 4-4 52 6-0 6-6 7-1 7s 7-1 63 5-7 53 5-1 5.G 4.7 4_1 4-3 4-6 4-9 5A 5.G 5.0 53 5-5 5-5 53 4-8 45 4.6 5.G 53 53 5-4 5.3 5:1 4-8 4. 3A 2.7 l Is 0-9 G-6 CA 0.3 0.3 02 b-2 .I 0-E b-I 0-1 O-1 0.1 0-0 I OA 0-0 OA OA OA O.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.! m 02 02 0.3 0.4 0A 02 i.2 1A 2A 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.5 5.1 5-3 6-3 6.7 72 7.7 3.3 &5 7.7 6-7 6.1 5.9 6.2 6.5 &1 SA 5.0 52 5.8 63 62 5.7 5.5 53 6A 6A 6-4 5.6 52 5.5 6.4 7.1 7.2 63 6B 6.a 53 5., 4.3 3.0� -�I 1.8 't-0 0.7 bd 0.5 0A 0.3 0.2 0.2 G2 0. I' 0.1 b.l 0.1 0.1 0.D No 0A 0-0 OA 0A 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0J 0.i 02 02 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 l.i i.5 2.1 2.7 32 3.9 4.6 5-1 5.7 6.1 65 718.0 9.3 1G-0 93 7-6 65 S.d 7-8 9.G 8.4 6.7 5.6 6-1 7.4 B-S BA 6.9 6.0 6.4 7-8 9.1 8A 6.7 5.9 6_9 8 9. 9.d &9 82 7.7 , 7A 6. 4.9 3.3 '�, 1.8 1-2 0.7 0-5 0.4 0.3 0.3 a2 b,2 0.2 0.1 a 0.1 0.} 0.1 OA 0A bA OA 0.0 O.t 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.l 0.{ Oa 02 0.3 0.3 0. 0.7 b l.4 1.0 2.6 3.3 4.0 4.d 52 5.7 6.1 d.dd.0 77 9,8 •I i.l 1 S 7. 6.1 6.4 B 5 i A V.9 7.1 PA I N 6L•� •1'-.5 9 4 2 5.7 6.1 & 1� 10h 9 8 ]A 5.3 5. V2 12A 1 10.1 V.I VA 82 7. 3.6 '2.1 l.3 1 A 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 .2 b2 b.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 b.0 0A bA bA b.6 a} 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.2 0.2 b3 0.4 0.6 08 1.3 1.9 26 3.3 4.0 4,6 5.3 5.7 5.2 6.2 62 ` 62 7 •4.1,•."'•„ 0.o 0.0 bo 0A oA 0.D O.l 5.1 b.l b.1 b.l 0.1 02 02 0.3 0.3 0. 0.7 i.1 1 LLL 26 32 43 5.0 5.5 5.9 b.275.8•• ' a0 bo bo OA OA 0.0 0.1 al al b.! b.l 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 a3 0.3 0-6 4.2 5.3 6.0 6.4 6-4 5.7 5 41) 3.0 3.0 0-0 OA OA bA OA 0.G b-1 0.1 0-1 OJ 0-I 0-I 0-1 b.2 0.2 02 0-3 0-5 {-❑ 1,6 27 S.d 4.5 5.6 A7 5-9 7A 6,6 5-I 3.0 2.1 0-0 G-0 oil)OA U0.0 0.1 0-1 b-1 0-I Q-I 0-1 0.1 0,1 0.2 b-2 R3 -5 a.8 6.2 7-3 7,6 7.6 7:1 5,5 3.2 2.2 1-I 19 2.7 3.d 0-0 0A 0-0 OA bA 0.0 O.l 0.1 0.1 O.i 0.! 0.1 0.1 O.l 0.2 0.2 0.3 -5 1.0 1 2.7 3.6 4.9 6.3 7h 7.8 7 4.a 3.d 2.9 ■ A~ 0.0 OA OA 0A 0A 0.0 O.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.! O.1 O.1 0.1 02 0.2 03 0-5 1-1 1.p 2.7 3.5 4.8 6.2 7.d 7.5 7-5 4 ! 11�H: 2$ 3-d 4. 0.0 b.0 0A bA bA O.o 0.1 0.1 0.1 'D.1 0.1 b.l b.l 0.2 0.2 02 0.3 0.5 t,0 1.8 2.6 3.4 4.5 5.8 6.8 63 6.7 53 4,❑ 2..3 OA 0.0 0A ao OA b.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.! 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 a2 0.3 ,OS I.0 1.7'', 2A 3.i 4.} 5.1 5.9 6A 5.9 '53 4,0 2.2 1.5 a0 bo 0o 'onoA 0.1 0.1 al al b.! b.! O.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 a2 0.3 004 o 1,6 '', 2.3 2.8 3A 4.5 4,9 5.1 5.! %=ag 1'33 2.IL. 13 0.0 bo bo OA OA 0.1 0.1 0-1 0-1 b-I al 0-1 b-! 0.2 0.2 0-2 70-3 bS 4 15 2-I 2.5 3.2 3.8 4-2 4-3 4-3 'i.4 0-0 0A 0-0 OA bA O.k 0-1 0-1 R1 0-! 0-1 0-I 02 0.2 0.2 02 0.3 -5 - - - - - - 2.7 32 3.5 3-6 3-4 2A 2t _ 1.7 7 O ll MH: 14 MH: 14 1 V ' MH: 14 1,20 SF MH. 14 M111 FF MH: 14 FF 74 MH: 14 RETAI CENT R CARIBOL- 7)800 sf 1.200 SF 1,200 SF 1,200 SF 1,200 SF 1,080 SF 1,800 SF 5. 9A VA BA 7. �. -:, 6.0 3.9� 2.d 1.5 •1 1 0.8 0.4 •5 0.d 0.3 0.3 .2 0.2 b.l 'a.1 0.1 b.f 0.1 7. 7h 8.3 8,6 8. _6 iA 2.5 1.6 1.1 0A 0.7 0. 0.4 0.3 0.3 .2 0-2 0.l 0.1 0.1 O.l 5.1 I 7.2 8A 8.6 7, r.. >� 2.4 '1-5 i. 0b bh ' 5 0.4 a3 b3 -2 b-2 0.1 b.l 0.1 O.f al I` -t MH: 2P l i1 8.5 8-4 7. 5.a 3.6. 2-1 1-4 1-❑ O-8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0-3 b-3 2 0-2 O-I 0-I b.l 0.1 b-1 '7$ 7-$ 6. 52 33 1.9 12 0-9 0-7 O 0.4 0.4 0-3 b-2 2 Q-2 0-1 0-I 0.1 O,i 0-1 ,I [ 61) 6.1 5.i 4.5 3.1 'I 7 l A Ds Oh 05 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 .2 b.2 03 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 6 SA. 1 4.a 5.1 4. 3.9 2.s%" 1 1-8 0-8 0-6 OS 9.4 0.3 O.3 0.2 0.2 2 O.1 O.1 (.1 0.} O.t 0.1 3. � 4.4 4S 4. 3.2 2.5.E -+1 -'1.7 0.9 0.6 V n. A. JCA. bS 0.3 b,2 a2 '0.2 .2 b] �0.1 b.l 0.} O.F 0.1 2 .. 4.2 4.0 3. 27 2.a}!+�+`�••,1.5 0.9 .5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 .1 0.f 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.t 0.1 2 I -3A=-. 74 3A 2. 2.3 ',.7 1,2 I b-9 S 0.3 OS 0.2 0.2 a2 a1 .! b.[ 0.1 0.1 0.5 O.f al 2 2-d.. 2$ 2.8 2. 2.1 'I 6:. •, •1 1 0-7 S b3 02 0.2 0.2 0-1 0-1 -! b.t 0-1 b-I 0-1 0.1 0.0 2-3 f14 2-3 2-4 2A 2.1 1.8 1A 1-0 b-6 5-5 0.3 .0-2 0.2 0.2 0-1 b,l ,! 0- 0-1 0-I 0-1 0.1 b.9 p-0 D-0 0A OA OA 0,t 0.1 bo 0.1 0-! 0-1 b-I b-2 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.3 G-5 ❑- 1-3 17 2.0 2.4 2.8 3A 3-p 2-8 2A 1.-9- - '1,4 1.0 0-3 - 0-d 0-4 0A 0 0.4 pA 0.4 p,d 0-4 O-3 0.3 O 0.3 0.3 0.3 p- 0-3 ❑-3 03 0- /J O.d 07 07 ,'L7 - 1- 2-1 F� 3-2 2-I 1. 1.6 1-3 '0.90-6 b-d 03 02 0,2 0.1 0.1 0.1 -i O. O-I 0-I 0.1 0.0 0-0 OA OA 0.0 bA bA 0.I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b2 b.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0A 2.1 2.4 2.5 2-6 2.3 i. .R_1� � 22 2 �1 1. 1.5 13 0.9 0-6 OA 03 02 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 .1 O. O.1 O.1 0.1 0.0 0A 09 13 1.6 1.8 2-0 1-6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0-4 0 4 G-5 OS ❑-5 ❑.5 ❑.5 0-d 0.4 G.4 0.d CA 0.4 ❑.4 ❑.4 O.d 0.d 0-3 GA DA O� ❑.d ❑ .9 '0.10.1 •1.1 •1A •k�.,_�°` i• 1.2 'al '0.1 0-0 0-0 0A OA bA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0-1 02 02 02 0.3 03 0.d 0-d 0-9 'IA 1.8 20 22 .,..,,.,.1.9 2.2/2'A - - --- - 1.. �r 22 2 1. 1.5 0.9 0- D A 0.3 b2 0.i 0.1 0.1 0.1 .l 0-F 0.1 0.0 0A U. ao b.0 0.o 0.0 OA b.l 0.1 ai a1 0.! 0.1 02 0.2 02 0.3 O.d O.d �.d 0a 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.6 19 t.9 1B •Ld 1.3 '! 1 0.4 A 0.7 b.d b.6 0.7. 0.7 0.7 0. O.d d b.d b.6 0.6 0h O.d 0.6 0. 05 �S 0S Oh 1�• 2.2 2I1\ 1. 1.5 '1� 08 0 0.4 0.3 01 0.1 0.1 01 01 I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0A 0A On bA O.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 02 0.2 0.3 0.3 O.d 0. O.d 0.8 1.0 12 1.4 l.d 1.7 lA 1A 'L7 1.5 1.3 1 2 1.0 .9 0.9 0A 08 OH 0.8 0.8 0. O.r ,7 b.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.a 0.7 0.7 - .4.7 07 2 22. ��, 2a 2.1 '. 1. •1.5 '12 '0.8 0. 0.4 0.3 02 O.l 0.1 a] 0.1 .I 0.E 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o bo OA 0A 0.1 0.1 0-1 0-1 0J b.2 02 02 0.3 0.3 0-a $ 0-6 0-8 -�1A 1-2 'L4 'L5 'V '1,8 1.3 1-7 1. 1`a 1 � '!,1 .0 1}p 1.o b.9 0-9 0-9 0.P 0. 0.9 -9 bs b-8 0-9 b.9 0.9 0.9 b- 0-9 5-8 b-8 0-9 2A 2- U4 24 23 2. 1.6 1.3 0.9 bA as b2 02 O.i 0.1 al a1 LI b. 0-1 b-I O.Q 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0A bo 0A OA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D.1 b.l 02 02 0.3 0.3 0,4 0.5 0-7 0-9 1.1 1.2 YA Y5 1.7 1,8 1.s 1.7 1,6 1.5 1A '1.3 1,2 1,1 1.1 1.0 '1A 1A 'I.0 'I.Q 'I,Q '1.0 1.0 1A 1A 1A 'Lk 'lli 1,1 1,1 '1.0 '!A 1 2- �I 2.7 16 2. 11A 1.4 ,D bA bA 0.2 02 0.1 0.1 0.1 al XI b. 0.[ b.l 0.0 0.0 0.0 I _ 0-0 O.a bA '01) OA 0-p 0,1 0.1 0.1 0-I 0-! 02 02 0.3 0.3 '0A 0h O-7 0-9 1-I 12 •1.4 'IS 1.7 '1 'is 't 1-8 11 'IA '1.5 13 1-3 12 12 1-1 '1-1 •!.f •I-1 I,I •1-1 1-I 1J '1Z 12 •1-3 1,3 •1-3 13 1-2 1-2 1)_213 )A 12A i 2-3 2 2 ,�iP�. 3.1 � 3A 2. 2.1 1-6 1.1 03 O-3 02 02 0.2 0.1 0.1 0,1 ,I 0-[ b-I 0-I 0.1 0.0 0-0 0A bo bo OA OD 0.0 0-1 p,1 0.1 O.I 0-1 0.2 0-2 0.3 O.A D.$ 0-6 0-7 1.5 17 1-8 1-9 1-9 •1,9, •1$ •1,7 "IA 1-5 1A 1-d 13 1-2 12 1.2 1-2 1-2 1.2 12 13 13 •1_4 1-5 'IA 1,6 1-$ iS 1-4 •1_4 '1-5 3-1 ;iNL.3-4 3h 3A 3.1 s 2.0 '1-3 Q7 O-d 03 022 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 .I b-E 0-1 0-1 0-1 0.0 0.0 1,8 2.2 2-5 0-0 0-0 0A OA bA 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.I 0-1 02 02 0.3 0.4 0-5 0.6 07 0-9 •l A •12 '1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2 2A 2.1 2A 19 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1-4 13 13 1.2 'L2 1.2 •1.3 13 '1A •1 S 1 A 'L7 1.8 •1.8 1.8 1.7 1 A •1 A 'I .7 � .9 2.4 2-8 1 3. •, 4-0 4.1 41) 3. -3.1 23 'I.d IDA • -d 0.3 b3 L2 02 0.1 0.1 LI 0-I b.l O.1 0.1 0.0 0-0 --47 0-O 0A OA OA 0A 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 O.I 0.1 O2 02 0.3 O.d 0.5 d 0-7 0-9 1.0 12 IA 1.6 1.7 1.P r12.1 L 22 22 22 2.i 2R •LP 1.7 1-d iS 1.4 1.3 •1.3 1.3 1.3 l.d lA 1S 1.6 1E 1.9 2❑ 2❑ •2.0�- 1.9 1E 1E 1.8 21 2.d 3-1 4- 4.9 4E 4. 3.6 2S '1-3 0.7 d.4 03 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 .I GA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0-9 0.0 OA 0.0 bA bA 0.a 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.! 0.! Oa 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.d 07 0,9 1.1 1.2 1 A 1.6 1.8 2A 2.2 2. 2A A 2.3 22 � 1.9 1. 1.6 '1A 3 1.3 1.4 'Ld 1S 1 19 '.2 . �'22 22 22 '2A � 1.9 A 22 2.8 3.3 4. 5.3 4 5.8 5h 5. d.2 2.7 'L5 OA 0 d OS 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 b.2 .I 0.1 0.1 O.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 '1.5 ,.. 2 11 0.0 0A 0A OA OA 0.❑ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0., 0.1 0.2 b2 03 0.4 0. 0.6 07 0,9 1.1 13 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2: '}2S 2.4 2A 22 2A 1 t.7 l A A 1 A 1.d t.d 1 1.9 1 2,2 ,d 2.d 2d 23 2.2 2.1 2.1 2A 2.9 3.5 4. ,:1 5.9 5.6 6A 5. a,9 : .150 ', 1.6 A O OA 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 .I 0.{ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 bo bo 0A 1W 0.0 0.} 0.1 0.1 D.i 0.1 02 0.2 0.3 0.4 0. 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 13 1.5 1.7 2 2.2 2-a 2. 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 \ 2.1 1. 1.7 1S A 1A 1,5 'L6 1.7 i 2A 1 2 2.4 .5 2.5 2.5 2-5 2-a - -2.2 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.6 a. II 5- I '••.d:3 -' 7-2 7,0 6. ".'s.i •4 as 1I, � 9 1.1 0•B 0h bA. 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 .I 0.� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 FffiT.- jjjLLL 0.0 OA OA OA OA 0.0 0.0 0.1 01 0.! b.! 02 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 06 0.7 0.9 1.1 13 1.5 '1.7 22 2,d 2- .5 .6 2.d 2-5 2.a 23 23 2.5 3.D 3.d a. 5. 6-a } 73 7.2 6. 3.2 '2,1) 08 Oh 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 52 I 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 AA 1 0-0 QA OA OA OA p.Q O.p 0,1 0.1 0.1 b-I O2 02 0.3 0.4 D.5 0.6 0.7 b-9 1-1 13 1.5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2-d 2- 2-d� 7 2,d 2.5 2-4 22 2- 1s 1S 1.4 •1.4 1-5 1,6 13 1- 2A 2 2A .5 2.d 2.d 2S 2-d 2-3 23 4.1 5 1� 6.9 6A 6. so AM: 2$ 13 0-7 O O-d 0.3 0.3 0-2 b-2 -1 0-1 0-1 Q-I 0-1 0.❑ 0.9 - ,\ / /C 0-0 D-0 O-0 b-0 bA 0.0 0.p 0-1 0.1 0-1 0-1 O-2 02 0.3 0.4 '0-5 CA DJ b-9 'I 12 )A 'I -6 1,8 \ 2-1 23 2- y� ,2-6M e�p 62$ 2.5 2d 2-3 21 1- 1-7 6 1S 1A '1 .4 1.5 '1-$ 1-6 i 2 I 2.3 :d•y '�� np 228 2-d 2A 22 22 2.d 2,P 3A 4- {{��' 62 6-1 1$- A.5 2.8 1-d D-9, 0-6 C �.5 p-4 0.3 0.3 0-2 0-2 -1 Q-i p-I 0-I 0-I 0.0 OA 0.0 0A O.❑ OA OA 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.! 'a1 02 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 'U Ys 1.7 �� 2.1 2. -2A •_d 2.4 2.3 22 1 1.7 1A 1A 'IA 1.4 •L5 '1.61 . 1E 23 .3 14� 2.d 23 22 2.1 2.1 23 2.8 4 SA SA 52 4. 3.P 2S 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 .I ❑.E 0.1 0.1 03 0.0 0.0 •@d '12 L '1.9 '13 '13 '1.3 •Ld �22 'I-3 0.0 OA 00 OA bA 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 OJ 0.2 02 0.3 0.3 0.d 0.5 0.7 b.8 0.P 1.1 l.d 1.6 lA 21D�\ I 23 23 22 2, j 2A 1.7 1.d 1.4 1.4 1S 1.6 1.7 15 0 22 22 2.1 ��12.8, 1.9 2.2 2.d 29 .7 43 4S 4A .1 3.3 2.3 O-d 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 I 0. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA bo 0.0 OA bA b.❑ b.0 0.1 0.1 0., 0.1 0.2 02 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.d 0 .9 1A 12 13 1.4 '1.d 1A 1.9 \'2A T;6---- 2.0 5.9 1.8 1.7 •IA 1S '1A 'iZ 5.3 13 '1.3 '1.3 lA 1S lh 1.7 1.8 1.9 -�---'gyp----4..o 1.9 1.8 1$ 1 Z..❑ Ij�jlj ;2.a 4 2.d 2.9 32 3.d 3.7 3.6 A 2.8 2.0 1. 0 0.3 0.3 b.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 .I 0. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.❑ 0.o 0.0 OA OA OD OA O.D 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 b.3 0.4 .5 O.d 0. 0.8 '1 'i.1 '1.2 12 1.5 1A '1.7 1.8 1S '1.8 '1.7 1.6 'L6 1S 'IA 1.3 1.2 1.2 12 'L2 'L2 1.3 1.3 1A 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.0 'IA 1.7 1.6 1.6 1 - -'1 :9 2.1� 2A 2A 3A 31 'A.: 2.7 2.2 1.7 11 0. 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.) 0.1 0.1 1 0. 'D.1 OA 0.0 0.0 0.Q 0.0 OA 0A oA OA 0.0 0.0 0.1 51 0.1 b.l 02 0.2 0.3 0.3 04 0 b.q b.7 b.8 b.9 'i, 'Lt 1.2 1,3 1-4 tS 1S 1h 'I.5 'I.5 1,5 1,4 1A 13 12 2 )A '1,1 1,1 '1,2 1.2 11 1S 1A )A 'iS '1,5 '1,5 1.5 1.d 1A 1S 'i.7 2.D 2.2 2.3 2A 2.d '.7 2h 1.8 'I,a 0.9 b 0.3 0.2 O.I O.S 0.1 0.1 ai ! b. OA bA O.D 0.0 OA b.0 0A bo aD OA O.D OA al a1 0.I b.l 02 0.2 02 0.3 Oa 0.5 0-5 0.6 0.7 08 0.4 0.9 '. 1,1 1.2 12 1.3 1.3 '13 13 1.3 1,2 12 1.2 1.1 1.1 'L} '1,1 1,1 'L1 1.1 1,I 1.1 12 1.2 '1.2 '1.3 1,3 1.2 t.2 13 13 'I,5 'LB 1.9 _ 2 2.2 2.Y 'I,5 'I. D8 S 0.3 bl b.l O.t 0.1 a a b.1 0A bA bA O.D O.D DA 0-0 0A DA b-0 OA 0.0 0.0 0-1 0.1 p-! 0-1 02 02 02 0.3 0A 0.4 GA 10.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 -�0.9 b-9 1W 11 - !-I }-1. _ .-. 1.C� 1.a- '1.0 -'9-9--'0[9- O-9 O-9 i7-P 1-0 I.D I.G I-0 kA i-❑ 1.1 '1,3 'I,$ 1-6 1,7 i$ 1A 1.P 1R 1.2 0.9 p-6 .[;»4 4-S 0-I 0-I 0.1 0.1 p-1 OA 0A OA OA 0.0 0.0 m 0A 0.o 0-0 0.0 0-I 0-I 0-1 0-2 0.3 0. "0A 0.6 0.7 0.7 0-7 a8 O.a - - 0.8 0.a 0.9 0.9 a9 0-9 0.9 0.8 0 AR K IN G - E K-8 0.8 '1.1 •1,2 1-3 1,d 1-5 1-5 1.6 *1 •1,3 DA GL3 02 0-I b-0 bo O-0 0.0 OA 0A 0A 0A 0.0 0-1 0.1 0.2 D3 0-5 Oh O,d 08 0-.?0,9 D-a-8 p-✓�AC o-9 _5 !,Q 5 0-1 0.1 0 - i 0-o OA 0A 0.0 0-0 0A OA 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 O.I O.I O.1 b2 02 b3 0.3 03 0-4 0.4 0.4 bL5 0.5 0. 0.6 0.6 10A 10-6 0.6 '0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0-7 0.7 0.7 b.7 '02 0.7 0.7 0.6 GA bA 0.6 b.6 b.d O.d 0.6 0.6 b.d O.d U b.7 0.9 1.1 •1.2 'T 13 1.3 12 0.9 07 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.I 0.D 0 0.0 0-❑ 0-0 0A bA '0.0 0.0 0A 0-0 OA 0-❑ OA 'an'0.0'0.00.1 0.1 O.I O.! 'alO.I 02 03 02 0.3 03 0.3 03 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.d O.d �4'� 0-5 0S OS 0-5 Oh 0-6 0.5 OS 0-5.5 0.6 O.7 0.8 lA 1.! 1.! 12 ' A 03 0.7 0, 0A 03 02 01 al O.G 0.p 0-O 0-0 0-0 OA OA a❑ 0.0 0-O Q.� 0.$ TO .1 0.1 5.1 C., 0.1 0.} 2 0.2 02 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0A O.d ' .d O.d 0.4 0.4 b.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 O.d O.d 0.4 0A OA 0.4 O.d O.d O.d 0.3 0.3 0A 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 Os 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 b., 0.1 0.1 O.D 0. 0.0 0.0 0A OA 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA bA OA 0.0 OA 0.0 0.❑ *ao 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.l ' .1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 03 02 0.3 0.3 ' .3 0.3 0.3 DA 0A 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 03 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0. 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 CA 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.5 0A 0.3 0.2 0.i 0.1 0.1 0.❑ 0.0 0.0 0.D 0.0 0A bA 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.0 bA bo 0,0 bA O.D OA 0.0 0.0 b.i b.1 b.l 0 1 1 1 G 2 PROPERTY L I N E 03 03 0-3 03 03 0.3 0.3 a3 03 0.2 0.2 0-2 0.2 02 02 02 02 0.2 0.2 03 03 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 bA oh 6.� 0.4 O.a 03 0.2 0.2 0.1 A O.D o.D o.D 0.0 OA 04 oA OA 0.0 0.0 00 ao 0.o 0.o oA b.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.! 0.1 b.l 0.1 0.1 aI a1 0,1 O.t b.1 0-: 'Q.k 0.1 Q.1 ai b.! a! b.l 0.2 02 02 0.2 0-2 b-2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 b2 b.2 02 b.2 02 O.i 0.1 b.l b-2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 b.a 0.4 0-4 0.4 0.4 oA 0.3 0.3 a0.2 0.2 O.I .I 0.1 oA 0.0 0.0 0.0 DA 0A OA oA OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 d a d 0-0 0A 0-0 0A OA O.Q 0.0 0-0 0-O 0-0 0-0 0-I 0.1 0-} O.t a1 0.1 O-i O-] 0,1 0-I '0.1,t O,1 0.1 0.1 O-1 0-! 0-I 0-I '0.1,1 0-1 0.1 0-1 0-1 02 02 O-2 0.2 0.2 02 5.1 b-3 0-! 0-I O-I 0.1 0,1 5.1 0-1 O-! 0-! b.l 02 0,2 02 0-3 0-3 0-3 03 03 03 b.z ° DC.2. sa.1 D b.l OA OA 0.0 O.Q 0-0 0.0 O-0 0-0 OA OA O.Q O.G 0.0 R0 0.o O.a OA On 0.0 O.D 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 OD 0.1 03 03 0.1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 b,l 0.1 b.l 0-1 0,1 0-I 0-I b.1 b,l 0.1 0.1 a1 0-1 b-] 0-3 O,I 0-I 0-1 0,1 0.1 0,1 0-3 O-! 0-1 •0-I 0.1 b-[ 0-1 0.1 O-! a -I b-1 0.1 0.1 02 02 0-2 02 02 022 02 02d b2 d0' 1 ---Oi 0-I 0-0 bA O.Q 0.Q 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0A 0-0 0.0 0.0 0-0 �.❑ -%D- b.G_ 0e On nn '❑A b.8 9B pA OA A 00 00 R D O1 B1 061 01 0.1 b.l b.l o.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.I O.I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 b.l O.i o.l o.l 0.1 022 02 02 03 0y - -�Q2 a1 0.1 0.1 0-1 oA dA oA 0.0 oA o.0 0-0 0A dA OA 0A 0.0 *D-o 1. Standard Reflectance of 80/50/20 unless noted otherwise 2. Not a Construction Document, for Design purposes only 3. Standard indoor calc points @ 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise 4. Standard outdoor calc points @ Grade unless noted otherwise 5. Mlazgar Associates assumes no responsibility for installed light levels due to field conditions, etc. Calculation Summary Label CalcT e Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min CalcPts_I Illuminance I Fc 1.11 12.0 10.0 N.A. N.A. Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Description Arrangement Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts LLF �] 4 AA ALM 210 T3 G3 4K SINGLE 21600 146.839 0.900 �] 1 1 BB alm21 Ot4g4k (I 2)_ alm210t5 4k 3 SINGLE 20700 153.1 145.8 0.900 0.900 2 CC SINGLE 21274 D 5 DD wfm49q 14k 7 SINGLE 4900 45 0.900 D 4 FF TRP 1-121-20-41(7-4 SINGLE 2151 19.9 0.900 LU co I- U0 Q ❑ 7� L CO c❑ U v 0 uMMicoo 00 I..fi co C 0 VJ V , L.L CN - E N LU c ua l E1V< H Q PV U Q O J " E!1 t C E U 0] 0 Revisions V 00 00 I- o v °O o '0 •o m a: F n, ❑ ❑ cn V z V 1 L/) Oz� oc U w rC � W Q O z O= SL-1 00 M ti O N O N O N ti 0 S L G LIGHTING AL Area Light Generation 3 ALL Large ALM Medium Imvges era shown {or iilusrmlalion purpose Doty. The AL Series Area Light Gera 3 comes in 2 sizes medium and large with a lumen output between 14,460 to 50,350 lumens. This versatile luminaire has different mounting options, photocell, and motion sensors for efficiency and greater energy savings. APPLICATIONS Auto Dealerships, Parking Lots, Walkways, Roadways, and other Public Areas, etc. REPLACEMENT ALM: 40OW MH ALL. i0OOW+ MH PROJECT: CATALOG #: FIXTURE TYPE: AA; BB; CC NOTES: 0�c ary 0Lt pry . , • r�rrao Ilfli� PREMIi1M SERIES NUMBER ALM 140 T3 G3 4K ®® 10OW 14,460 Type III 4000K ALM 140 T3 G3 5K 100W 14,538 Type III 5000K ALM 210 T3 G3 4K 150W 21,600 Type III 4000K ALM 210 T3 G3 5K 750W 22,000 Type III 5000K ALM 280 T3 G3 5K* 20OW 28,000 Type III 5000K ALL 430 T3 G3 4K 30OW 42,815 Type III 4000K ALL 430 T3 G3 5K 30OW 44,000 Type III 5000K ALL 510 T3 G3 4K 350W 49,904 Type III 4000K ALL 510 T3 G3 5K 350W 50,350 Type III 5000K MOUNTING & OPTIONS Fa AL -SPAR AL-WM AL•SFD AL•T ALG2•Y PGl PC-2 *LAC cerfiFcotion pending S LG:` LIGHTING W F Full Cutoff gall Paick Series Gen 3 INk 06k WFL G3 Large _ t RVH S KC IMOMM COMPLIANT WFM G3 Medium PERFORMANCE INFORMATION The next generation WF Full Cutoff Wall Pack Series Gen 3 comes with newly designed Optics for increased beam angle and illumination. This versatile iuminoire provides excellent uniformity and full cutoff light distribution and is available in medium and large for varied mounting heights. This con be used in a variety of Commercial, Industrial, and Security applications. PROJECT: CATALOG #: FIXTURE TYPE: DD NOTES: APPLICATIONS Security Lighting, Perimeter Lighting, Building Entrances, Walkways, etc. REPLACEMENT 15OW - 40OW MH i OPTIONS MS-FSP-212 1_3/1_7 ORDERING GUIDE EXAMPLE: ALM 140 T3 G3 5K Luminaire Lumen Clulpul Dist- Type Generation Voltage CCT Finish Mount Options Type m ALM ❑ 1140 14,460 Lumens ®T3= Z G3 [ifl BLANK= m 4K m BLANK= Z AL -SPAR= ❑ PC- 1 =Tw ist- loc k Photocell Area Light 0 210 21,600 Lumens Type III 120-277V 4000K Dark Bronze Square and (120-277V) Medium ❑ 280 28,000 Lumens �T4-_ ❑HVU= El 5K [I C- Round Pole Mount ❑ PC-2=Twist-lock Photocell Type IV 5000K Custom— (347-48OV) 347-480V ❑ AL-WM= ZTS= Type V PALM Ian Not Included for HVU) Well Mount ❑ Al ❑ PC-3=7-Pin receptacle ❑ M5-FSP-212=Motion ❑ ALL ❑ 430 44,000 Lumens Area Light ❑ 510 50,350 Lumens Slipfiltef Mount Sensor (Choose 1 ] Large ❑ AL-SFD-Pl= SlipFilter Mount ❑ L3=40' diameter lens with PC-1 ❑L7=100' diameter lens ❑ AL-T= Trunnion Mount ❑ ALG2-Y= Yoke Mount (ALL only) * * For a custom color, please call to place your order Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. Airpurt 8ouIeYard, Suite 1400 1 Houston, Texos 1 713-389-5680 1 sok9slgus-tom rs]2019 Spring Ughfing Group. All Righls Resarred- Page 1 /6 ALG3.20.01 SSS-H SERIES Gat# "'" ` HUBBELL HlJE3BELl� Outdoor L.igFtrting POLES Job Type ` Approvals 3QUARE STRAIGHT STEEL AA; BB; CC Overall Height 10' - 40' Handhole : APPUCATIONS • Lighting installations for side and top mounting of luminaires with effective projected area (EPA) not exceeding maximum allowable loading of the specified pole in its installed geographic location CONSTRUCTION • SHAFT: One-piece straight steel with square cross section, flat sides and minimum 0.23" radius on all comers; Minimum yield of 46,000 psi (ASTM-A500, Grade B); Longitudinal weld seam to appear flush with shaft side wall; Steel base plate with axial bolt circle slots welded to pole shaft Having minimum yield of 36,000 psi (ASTM A36) • BASE COVER: Two-piece square aluminum base cover included standard • POLE CAP: Pole shaft supplied with removable cover when applicable; Tenon and post -top configurations also available • HAND HOLE: Rectangular 3x5 steel hand hole frame (2.38" x 4.38" opening); Mounting provisions for grounding lug located behind gasketed cover • ANCHOR BOLTS: Four galvanized anchor baits provided per pole with minimum yield of 55,000 psi (ASTM F1554). Galvanized hardware with two washers and two nuts per bolt for leveling Anchor bolt part numbers: 3/4 x 30 x 3 — TAB- 30-M38 1 x 36 x 4 — TAB-36-M38 FINISH • Durable thermoset polyester powder coat paint finish with nominal 3.0 mil thickness • Powder paint prime applied over "white metal" steel substrate cleaned via mechanical shot blast method • Decorative finish coat available in seven standard colors; Custom colors available; fiAL number preferable; Internal protective coating available WAREHOUSE `STOCKED' PULES., ■ SSSH20-40A-4-HV-DB-RDC,SSSH25-40A-4-HV-DB-RDC and 5SSH30-508-4-HV-DB-RDC • The HV designation in the above catalog numbers is a combination of the S2 pattern and the B3 pattern 18" POLE CAP TENON BASE COVER BASE DETAIL 1 — Anchor Bolt 1 Hex Nut aplr Square (ourer) Flat Washer + Base Prate o — sort Square Slnnerl bolt Projection 'aoR Ciate [outer} Fiat washer — Hex Nut.-� 270H90' Groutwithdraint Solt Clyde[inner) '- - — optional /� Engineering of iKc Level Foundation footing by others ORDERING INFORMATION Reference page 2 for available configurations ORDERING EXAMPLE: SSS - H - 25 - 40 - AIBIC - 2L - S2 - DBT - UL SSS-H Square Straight Reference page 2 Reference page 2 Reference 1 Single arm mount BLT Black Matte Textured GFI' 2DAmp GFCI Steel Pole Ordering matrix Ordering matrix page 2 2 Two fixtures at 180' BLS Black Gloss Smooth Receptacle and Cover Hubbell Outdoor Ordering matrix 2L Two fixtures at 90° DBT Dark Bronze Matte Textured EHH, Extra Handhole MOUNTING ORIENTATION 3T Three fixtures DBS Dark Bronze Gloss Smooth COS' .Y Coupling penates handhoie location at 90• GTT Graphite Matte Textured COT -75" Coupling 1 2 2L 3T 4 4 Four fixtures at 90' LG5 Light Grey Glass Smooth 0207 2" Coupling TA Tenon (2.38" OD PSS Platinum Silver Smooth MPB' Mid -pole Luminaire x 4" Tall) INHT White Matte Textured Bracket TB Tenon (2.88" OD WHS White Glass Smooth VM2 2nd mode vibration x 4" Tall) damper VGT Verde Green Textured 1 kwevable tenon used In conjunction with sidearm mounting. First specify desired arm TC Tenon (3.5" OD LAB Less Anchor Bolts configuration followed by the "TR" nalalion- Example: SSS-11-25.404-1-S2-TR•0111 x 6" Tall) r 1 UL UL Certified 2 Specify optima lion using logic found on page 2 (Option stlon) T'R' Removable Tenon CC Custom Color 3 VM1 recommendende d an pates 20'and taller Wtib EPA al less tha0nn 1.1. (2.38" x 4") ACCESSORIES- Order Separately OT Open Top (in- DRILL Catalog Number I Description cludes pole cap) 81 Cruzer, "AM" arm YM1' 1 st mode vibration damper B3 2 bolt (2-V2" spacing), Viper "A" arm VM2S%X 2nd made vibration damper S2 2 bait (3-Y2" spacing), Viper "AD" arm HUBBELL Hubbell Outdoor Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard ■ Greenville, SC 296G7 • Phone: 864-678-1000 HUBBELL HueeFt 1 rlueeEL.L Outdoor Lighting Due to our continued efforts t0 improve our products, prod afe subject to change Without notice. Lighting 0 2020 HUBBELL OUTDOOR LIGHTING, AI Rights Reserved • For more information visit our WCWte: WWW-hu4WlWdoorxw • Prinled in USA SWH POLES -SPEC 031M MS•FSP-212 L311_7 4 �j PC UNV 63 EL 11NV-8W SERIES NUMBER WFM 40 G3 5K MC)UNTING HEIGHT 8-20 ft 27W =E 3,800 5000K WFM 65 G3 5K 12-20 ft 45W 6,300 5000K WFM 100 G3 5K 12-30 ft 7OW 9,750 5000K WFL 125 G3 5K 15-30 ft 90W 12,300 5000K WFL 180 G3 5K 15-30 ft 135W 18,000 5000K ORDERING GUIDE EXAMPLE: WFM 40 G3 4K Luminaire Type Lumen Output Generation Voltage CCT Finish Options Rl WFM (71 40 3,800 Lumens Z G3 Z BLANK= 94K Z BLANK• m BLANK -No Option Full Cutoff Wall Pack ❑ 65 6,300 Lumens 120-277V 4000K park Bronze ❑ PC UNV 83=Button Photocell Medium ❑ 100 9,750 Lumens ❑ 5K 5000K ❑ C= Custom' ❑ WFL ❑ 125 12,300 Lumens ❑ BLANK= ❑ BLANK -No Option Full Cutoff Well Pack ❑ 180 18,000 Lumens 120-277V ❑ PC UNV B3=Button Photocell Large ❑ HVU= ❑ M5451P•212=Motion Sensor (Choose 1) 347-488V ❑ L3=40' diameter lens ❑ L7=100' diameter lens ❑ EL UNV-8W=Emergency Backup Kit "For a custom color, please call to place your order Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. Airpurt 8oulerard, Suite 9400 1 Houston, Texos 1 713-389-5680 1soles�slgus.torn Page 1 �5 q)2019 Spring Lighting Group. All Righls Resefred- WF G3.20-01 TRP1/RD11/QSP1 FF GeoPak Architectural Wallpacks Small sized architectural wallpacls in three styl- • Zero uptight (0), dark sky, neighbor friendly io ish shapes accentuate building architecture and optics provide excellent illumination and uniformity • Drivers IP66 and ROHS compliant c C�-PA, ~` ■ Back box accessory available for surface conduit � ry ■ Design Lights Consortiums {DLCJ qualified. __ application Please refer to the DLC website for specific a ■ Die-cast aluminum with a hinged back -plate for product qualifications at wVyw.designliohts.ora Trapezoid ease of installation and maintenance. Battery Backup: d - The LED bezel and trim -plate are made of stain- • Less steel Optional Battery Backup provides emergency r� lighting for the required 90 minute path of - Wet Location Listed to UL924 and UL1598 Stan- egress Radius dard - Includes a long4ife Lithium Iron Phosphate Cs PowereclW - 0-10V dimming driver standard battery and optional battery heater for cold IR s Dl1AL LfIE • - 10kA surge protector temperature application Quartersphere ■ universal spider plate for mounting to standard • Spectrons' self-testing/self-diagnostic electron- 3 1/2" and 4" square electrical boxes ics are included standard �arnl�trarlalla:aORDERING INFORMATION FRD11 - 12L - 20 1-14K7 - �4 [67'- FD E3 - - n ' �� ® r r �® r 'r r• r r• t TRPI Trapezoid 12L 12 LEDS 15 15 watts 31<7 3000K, 2 Type II U 120V-277V Bl. Black PCU Button F4 Fusing ROI1 Radius 20 20 watts 70CRI 3 Type III 1 126V pg Bronze PhotocontrolE1 Battery Pack 41<7 4000K, SCP2.3 Programmable (00 C) QSPI -Sphere 30 30 watts 70CRI 4 Type IV 2 208V GR Gray motion sensor Battery Park 5K7 5000K, 3 240V P5 Platinum EH1 (-30° C) 70CRI 4 277V WH White with heater CC Custom r Color 8F Up to 8ft mount height 20F Up to 20ft Voltage specific (120 or 277V only) mount height 2 Must order minimum of one remote control to program dimming settings, 0-10V fully adjustable dimming with autpmatic daylight °a librati an and different time delay settings, 12D-277V only PCu option not applicable, rnduded in sensor 4 Must specify input voltage (120, 2a8, 240 or 277) ACCESSORIES (ORDER SEPARATELY) Catalog Number 1 Description ;CP-REMOTE I Remote control for SCP option. Order at Least one per project to program and control dimming settings SB-GEG-XX I Black box with 4 - 1 2" threaded conduit holes, specify finish by replacing "xX" with finish selection, e . Dark Bronze "DB" PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DIMENSIONS Cse• 77 TRP1-EH 6.ss- RDIl-EH (1d7 mmj Weight: [IB7 mm] Weight: 11.5 lbs [5.2 kg) 11.5 lbs [5.2 kg) 5.49" 13.14" 7.8 Y' 1 1 73.m9" {216 mm}� you mm]� I r198 mm] {332 mm] ■" QSP3-EH (l72 mm] Weight: 10.5 lbs (4-7 kg) HUBBELL _ 7.81- 73.09' HueeEtt Qutdaar Lighting [79e run){332 mm] 190 Visit www.hubbetioutdoor.com/products for up-to-date availability information 1 hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr Date Date Reg. No. 16362 Proiect Manager DLA ©COPYRIGHT 2020 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Tel: 952.943.9660 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 taiv .edfarrarch.com Client Proiect Otter Crossing Location Main Street & Otter Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN Issued or Date I 77E PL7REviEw 0ra Sheet Title SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES Proiect Number Sheet Number 20.001 SL-2 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: August 12, 2020 REQUEST: Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat CASE NUMBER: PF2019-005 FP2019-006 APPLICANT: Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC Attn: Jeff Heinecke 1415 Almond Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 OWNER: Same REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: May 18, 2020 60-Day Review Deadline: July 17, 2020 Extension Deadline: November 14, 2020 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: June 10, 2020 July 15, 2020 August 12, 2020 Tentative City Council Work Session: September 8, 2020 Tentative City Council Meeting: September 14, 2020 BACKGROUND The applicant, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC has submitted a land use application for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat for development of Phase 1, the senior living community. Future PUD Final Plans/Final Plats will be required for development of the future commercial phases. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Revised PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Submittal (78 plan sheets) prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers, Loucks and AJA, Inc. received May 11, 2020 • PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Submittal (130 plan sheets) prepared by Wold, Loucks and AJA, Inc. received May 11, 2020 • Sub -Slab Drainage System Design Report prepared by Braun Intertec dated October 11, 2019 • Plan and Profiles Sheets (40 sheets) prepared by Wold, Loucks and AJA, Inc. dated May 11, 2020 • Road Cross Section Sheets (40 sheets) prepared by Wold, Loucks and AJA, Inc. dated May 11, 2020 • 49 & J Road Concept Layout prepared by SEH dated June 11, 2020 • Revised Storm Water Management Report, prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates dated July 13, 2020 • Design Guidelines prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers received on May 11, 2020 • Exterior Elevations prepared by Wold received August 6, 2020 Previous Council Action • August 6, 2018: Council review of PUD Concept Plan • April 8, 2019: Ordinance No. 07-19 Rezoning Property from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development o Details permitted, accessory, conditional and administrative uses specific to the 20 acre site • April 8, 2019: Resolution No. 19-42 Approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat o Establishes development's framework in regards to lot and yard requirements, height regulations, impervious surface and design guidelines • May 11, 2020: Resolution No. 20-44 approving PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan SUMMARY On June 10, 2020, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat and motioned to postpone recommendation to allow Lyngblomsten time to address some of the Boards concerns. On July 15, 2020, the Planning & Zoning Board held a special work session to review Lyngblomsten's response. The following is a summary of discussion points from the June loth and July 15th meetings: Architecture and Exterior Elevations • Cottage Homes The Board requested an additional color scheme be added to the palette. A gray slate color was added for a total of 3 different color schemes (blue, sage and gray). 2 • Senior Living Building The color palette was revised to include siding colors more similar to the original plan. The blue lap siding and white board 'n batten were applied differently to modify the overall exterior composition. A stone cap/ledge was better defined in the renderings between the stone and the siding to better differentiate between the materials. The heights of the parapets and main entrance were increased to provide more building variation and interest. The stone was removed from the exterior HVAC columns and utilized at grade to a minimum second floor height. There are no longer any (4) story elevations with siding only. The "eyebrow" elements are clad in the wood look fiberon product. The vertical signage at Gateway/Hodgson was removed from the East side (remains on North and will be internally lit at night). • Height The following is a summary of the senior building height comparisons: April 2019 � May 2020 August 2020 Change Top of Wall + (May 2020 Parapet = Top of Wall + Parapet = Top of Wall + Parapet = to August Md is Total Total Total 2020) 2 story-SC/MC 23' + 2' = 25' 25'3"+ 2' 11"=28'2" 25'3"+ 2' 11"= 28'2" 0 3 story -AL 33' + 4' = 37' 35' 10"+1'5" = 37'3" 35' 10" + 2'4" = 38'2" +0' 11" 4 story -IL 43' + 3' = 46' 4696" + 296" = 4990" 4656" + 4' 0" = 5096" +1' 6" Main Entrance 43' + 5' = 48' 4696" + 296" = 4990" 5096" + 1' 8" = 52' 2" +3' 2" • Building Footprint The building footprint increased 2,805 sf. The total floor area decreased 5,407 sf due to design development. The preliminary floor area calculations included potential rooftop patios and fourth floor pub with outdoor dining spaces. or r Building PFFootprint Total Floor Area Senior Living Building 76,713 79,518 sf 292,462 287,055 sf It should also be noted the first floor Town Center increased from 13,227sf to 18,160sf to house amenities from the omitted clubhouse. The clubhouse was programmed for 4,450 sf of amenity space. Future Development of Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot C The Board requested the future development of Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot C be required to be reviewed by the Planning& Zoning Board. This will be presented to the Council for consideration. Signs It is not uncommon for residential care facilities and multi -family building to have wall signs. The senior building proposes a vertical wall sign on north side of the building. The applicant has expressed a strong interest in "branding" the development. Monuments signs are also common features in campus settings such as Lyngblomsten. Trash and Service Areas The Woodridge neighborhood expressed concerns regarding the fact that the trash and services are not incorporated within the buildings as required in the Master Plan. • Commercial buildings must incorporate trash and service areas within the buildings rather than utilizing outdoor enclosures. This will conserve land and maximize the potential for outdoor seating and pedestrian friendly amenities. The general intent of any trash enclosure requirement is to screen dumpsters, recyclable materials and necessary handling equipment from public view. The generator, trash compactor and dumpsters are located at the bottom of the parking garage entry and loading dock approximately 7 ft below grade. Decorative fencing, coniferous trees, landscaping and senior living building will provide additional screening. The Master Plan specifically references "commercial buildings" with the intent to conserve land and maximize outdoor seating. The commercial buildings for the development are located near the intersection of CSAH 49 and CR J. The senior living building is a residential independent living and care facility and would not be subject to this commercial building requirement. The remainder of this is staff report is an update to the June 10, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board report and incorporates applicable revisions. BACKGROUND This staff report provides a comparison of the approved PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Changes in the plans are either narratively described or shown as st-Fikethfeiigk (deletions) or underline (additions). Overall, the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. General Site Plan Overview NI Lyngblomsten is proposing a 3 4 phased approach to redevelopment of g 7 parcels totaling 20 acres located in the northwest quadrant of CSAH49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street). • Phase 1 is the senior living community consisting of the following housing options: tinL Development Stage Plan (April 2019 Final Plan (May 2020) Difference # Units # Units # Units Cottage Homes 20 20 0 Senior Living Campus • Independent Living 100 96 -4 • Assisted -Living 50 35 -15 • Skilled Care 48 56 +8 • Memory Care 0 16 +16 TOTAL 218 The market rate cottage homes are 44, N sf 1,480 sf single level homes with 2 bedrooms and an attached i'�r 20' 10" x 20' 10" garage. The houses include a 6 ft deep porch across the front of the house and a 10' x 10' patio in the rear. The senior living community independent and assisted -living units are market -rate and mid -range in price with a variety of 1- and 2-bedroom units and heated underground parking. Through final design, the number of units shifted between uses. Memory care units are now incorporated into the Assisted Living wing. The Skilled Nursing Facility is now referred to as Skilled Care and will be constructed in a future phase of development. As approved by Resolution No. 20-44, the clubhouse and associated parking lot have been omitted from the original plans in order to provide additional stormwater management. The amenities proposed with the clubhouse have now been incorporated into the Town Center of the main senior living building. The size of the first floor Town Center has increased from 10,200 13,227sf to 1 Q� 18,160 sf to accommodate the amenities. • Phase 2 is a stand-alone 6,000 sf restaurant with outdoor patio • Phase 3 is future commercial development • Phase 4 is the skilled care wing The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 6 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently demolished 49 Club. The development order of the future phases may vary. 5 The development is accessed from CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) via an internal public road and two private roads. Zoning, Land Use and Density Current Zoning r_u General a„s;ross PUD, Planned Unit Development Current Land Use Rural Residential and Commercial Mixed Use (Master Planning Study- 2030 Future Land Use Hodgson Road and CR J) Density = 8-15 units per acre Proposed 2040 Future Signature Gateway District Land Use Density = 8-10 units per acre Utility Staging Area Stage IA (2008-2015) Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the site is guided mixed use and per the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan, it is guided Signature Gateway. The parcels have been rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Planning Study -Hodgson Road & CR J. The Master Plan covers approximately 60 acres of land on both the west and east sides of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent with the Master Plan. It assumed that approximately half of the 60 acre area would develop with residential uses at approximately 10 units per acre overall. The Comprehensive Plan identifies a density range from 8 to 15 units per acre for the Mixed Use District portion. The proposed development would have a net density of 946 8.09 units per acre on site, which is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan. Dev Final Stage Plan Plan Gross Area (acres) 20.47 21.0 Wetlands & Water Bodies (0.28) (0.28) Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW (1.79) (1.83) Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) (0.24) (0.24) Eff7 =NetArea acres) 18.16 18.67 6 # of Units' 170 151 Gross Density (units/acre) 8.30 7.18 Net Density (units/acre) 9.36 8.09 'Per Met Council, skilled nursing facilities/units are not counted toward a community's net residential density. 218 total htnit-s 48 SAT -units. 223 total units — 56 SC-16 MC = 151 units Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve Commercial Commercial Commercial South (City of Shoreview(City of Shoreview(City of Shoreview East GB Commercial Mixed Use General Business R-IX, Single Single Family Low Density West Family Executive Residential Residential Master Planning Study -Hodgson Road & CR J The development of this property is guided by the Master Planning Study -Hodgson Road & CR J ("Master Plan"), which was approved by the City Council in 2007 via Resolution No. 07-21. The Master Plan anticipated a mix of residential and commercial uses on the site, specifically noting that the mixed use district "would allow for, though not mandate, the inclusion of residential units, possibly in multi -story buildings. This would provide customers for the commercial development, and the commercial services would be convenient to the residents." The Master Plan had four objectives: 1. Identify appropriate land uses (present and future) in the study area. 2. Plan for road improvements to provide good access and circulation. 3. Identify routing & phasing solutions for utilities to facilitate future development. 4. Plan for redevelopment while recognizing existing businesses. The Master Plan identifies planning and redevelopment requirements related to site configuration, transportation and access, trails and open space, municipal utilities, site design and urban form and stormwater management that should be incorporated into proposed developments. These requirements are detailed below. 7 Planning and Development Requirements (The following bullets and italicized text are requirements of the Master Plan. Staff comments follow in regular text.) General • This Master Plan is to be incorporated into the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan with an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes amendments to the Proposed Land Use Map: the area east of Hodgson Road should be designated Mixed Use instead of Commercial. Minor inconsistencies in the Proposed Land Use Map should be corrected as well, and zoning amendments should follow if and when appropriate. The Master Plan was adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and will also be incorporated into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • Rezoning as part of new development applications will be examined for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and this 49/JMaster Plan. Per Ordinance No. 07-19, the site was rezoned from GB, General Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Master Plan. • The Master Plan is the guiding plan for development in the area. The Master Plan is intended to show a general land use arrangement with some specific design elements. The individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process, but should be based on the Master Plan, including specific elements noted below. The Master Plan generally envisions townhome housing on the north and west portions of the site with a mix of residential and commercial uses on southern portions of the site. The Master Plan notes that "individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process." The proposed Lyngblomsten senior living community proposes 20 cottage homes on the north end and a senior living campus on the eastern edge along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). Commercial development on the southern portion of the site includes a restaurant and future commercial pad that will be built out in the future. Additionally, this type of senior living campus does serve as an employment center for the staff. The City has previously treated assisted living facilities as commercial uses in both the Legacy development (Lino Lakes Assisted Living) and with Gracewood Assisted Living. • Tax increment financing and tax abatement on qualifying properties should be considered potential tools for implementing the Master Plan. N. The applicant has been approved for tax incremental financing to assist with the development of this project. Overall, the PUD Final Plan is consistent with the general goals of the Master Plan. Transportation and Access • Accesses to Hodgson Road and Co. Rd. J are to be located at the points indicated on the Master Plan. The City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have been working together the with the applicant for the past 2+ years on right-of-way acquisition, access points and intersection improvements. Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection and preliminary concept plans provide for additional turn lanes to mitigate traffic. Both roads are County roads and ultimately fall under their jurisdiction. o There is to be one full access on Hodgson Road, located 990± ft north of the CR J intersection (approx. 330 ft south of the northern edge of the study area). This access is to be centered on the property line east of Hodgson at this location. No other new permanent accesses are to be allowed. As development occurs, the City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along Hodgson. Access to Hodgson Road is proposed at two locations: a full movement access approximately 1000 ft north of CR J that is consistent with the Master Plan and a right- in/right-out access approximately 440 ft north of CR J. This second access will improve circulation and accessibility to the site and is recommended by staff. The north access has a southbound 12 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and a varying width left turn striped median that provides access to 6064 & 6074 Hodgson Road (Rock Gardens). Northbound lanes include a 12 ft left turn lane, 12 ft wide thru lane and the existing right turn paved shoulder. The south access is Right In/Right Out only. It has a southbound 13 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and 12 ft wide left turn striped median that provides access to 6020 & 6034 Hodgson Road (Bob's Auto Ranch). Northbound lanes include a 12 ft wide thru lane and existing right turn paved shoulder. o West of Hodgson Rd., there is to be one access onto CR J, located as far west as possible from the Hodgson/CR J intersection. This new access is to be constructed as right Wright out only. This will be a driveway into the development site, and there will be access easements on that site to provide access to, from, and through property to the north, leading to the full access on X Hodgson. No other new accesses are to be allowed. The City will work toward eliminating all other accesses along CR J. As supported by Resolution No. 19-42, Lyngblomsten acquired the 0.54 acre parcel to the west of their project (275 Ash Street) and has shifted Gateway Drive to the west approximately 50 ft to align with St. Albans Street to the south. Gateway Drive is now approximately 400 ft to the west of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). This provides greater access spacing along CR J (Ash Street) and reduces the previous road off -set between Gateway Drive and St. Albans Street. This intersection access has a westbound 13 ft wide right turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane and 10 ft striped median. Eastbound has a 12 ft wide left turn lane, a 12 ft wide thru lane, and 6 ft wide paved shoulder. The City of Shoreview has expressed concerns regarding cut through traffic south onto St. Albans Street. Currently, there are times when eastbound traffic on CR J turns right onto St. Albans St. to avoid backups at the main CR J & CSAH 49 intersection due to the lack of a dedicated southbound right turn lane onto Hodgson Road. The proposed SEH intersection improvements provide a 12 ft wide right turn lane, 12 ft wide thru lane and 12 ft wide left turn lane at the intersection. These changes will improve traffic circulation through the intersection and minimize the need for cut through traffic. The City of Shoreview is also requesting the intersection at CR J and St. Albans be a 3/4 intersection. This would be supported by Lino Lakes and Anoka County staff. • The access points, right of way, and internal circulation routes noted above are to create a circulation network serving all properties in the study area rather than individual driveways onto arterial and collector roads that serve only individual properties. A public road will extend north -south through the development providing public access to the senior housing complex, restaurant and future commercial development. The road right-of-way is 60 ft wide and the paved road surface is 32 ft back to back. Sidewalk is proposed on both sides of the public road on the north end and on the east side toward the south end closest to the development. On -street parking will be allowed on both sides. A 26 foot wide private road will serve the cottage home neighborhood. Sidewalk is proposed on the south side and will connect to the public road sidewalks. Two parking areas with a total of 11 parking stalls are provided on the west and east ends of the private road for visitors. No parking will be allowed on the private road. The east end cul de sac was flipped to the south to provide more separation between some of the cottage homes. The southerly right in/right out access off of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) will also be a commercial private road. The paved road surface has been reduced from 32 to 26 ft wide back to back. Both private roads will be owned and maintained by the developer. 10 • The Hodgson/CR J intersection is to be signalized prior to or as part of any significant development in the study area. This is to be a cooperative effort of Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers. Specific design requirements are to be determined. Signals were installed at the intersection in 2008 and modified in 2017. • Other road improvement needs such as additional lanes, median, and the like will be designed in cooperation with Anoka and Ramsey Counties, the Cities of Lino Lakes and Shoreview, and developers, as appropriate. Specific design requirements are to be determined. Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection. The proposed improvements have been noted above. Anoka County Highwqy Department is proposing to be the lead agency on design and letting of the CSAH 49 and CR J road and intersection reconstruction project. Cost sharing details between the entities will be finalized when estimates are complete. Potential road reconstruction will be in 2022 to coincide with the Lyngblomsten development. • The quantity of development of the area will be limited to ensure that traffic generation does not exceed the capacities of Hodgson Road, the intersection with Co Rd J, or the new access. Development shall not create the need for a traffic signal at the new full access on Hodgson Road. o Planning for the area must look forward to full development of the study area so as not to allow one project to "use up capacity" so that other sites cannot develop without creating the need for a signal at the new access. As noted, a traffic analysis was completed for the development. Peak trip generation from the proposed development is approximately 1/3 of the trip generation provided for in the Master Plan. No signal is proposed at the new full access. • Right of way will be dedicated with development to ensure adequate right of way for Hodgson and CR J as well as for the internal circulation system, as necessary. The final plat dedicates additional right-of-way ranging from 27 ft to 45 ft along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) creating 60 ft to 75 ft of dedicated right-of-way from section line and/or roadway centerline. The final plat also dedicates an additional 10-17 ft of right-of-way along CR J (Ash Street) to provide a fu1160 ft from section line. The internal public road is dedicated with 60 ft of right-of-way. 11 Overall, the proposed development is consistent with the Transportation and Access goals of the Master Plan. Trails, Open Space • A trail connection, included as an `enhancement corridor' in the Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan, will be established across the study area. This will link to the existing trail connection to Woodridge Lane on the west, cross through the study area, and link to a future trail in Ware Road. The specific alignment of this trail corridor across the Master Plan area will be determined as development occurs. The Lyngblomsten site plan includes an 8.5 foot wide bituminous trail that extends from the existing Woodridge Lane trail to the private cottage home road then to an 8.5 ft wide trail along the full length of Hodgson Road. The trail corridor originally connected to the clubhouse and between the cottage homes but this has been revised when the clubhouse was omitted. An 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail will also be constructed along CRJ/Ash Street and ultimately connect to Woodridge Lane. Sidewalks internal to the development along the public and private roads will also be constructed to provide additional connectivity. • An, open, focal point green space is to be created where the Woodridge Lane trail connection enters the study area. The specific design of this focal point will be reviewed with any development application for the site. The original concept site plan included a community garden and lilac trees adjacent to the wetland that created an open, focal point green space in this location. Due to the need for additional storm water management, the community garden has been replaced by a stormwater pond. The pond and landscaping still creates an open, focal green space as required. The cottage home neighborhood also includes 4.54 aeros (7 ) 4.46 acres (70%) of landscaped common open space that will be maintained by Lyngblomsten or an association. • A trail should be constructed along Hodgson Road in accordance with the City's parks and trails plan. This could be accomplished with sidewalks in the study area. An 9 8.5 ft wide bituminous trail is proposed along the full length of Hodgson Road. Sidewalks are also proposed along the public and private roads. 12 • Greenspace buffering is an important design element for new development along the border with existing neighborhoods such as Woodridge Estates and Rohavic Oaks. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. The property owner at 253 Woodridge Lane noted the buffer behind his parcel tapers from 40 ft to 6 ft. After grading and installation of road improvements, staff and the developer will work with the property owners of 251 and 253 Woodridge to provide acceptable landscape and fence screening from the private commercial road. A triangulated row of coniferous trees will be planted on the west side of Gateway Drive along the rear lot lines of 255 Woodridge Lane and 255 Ash Street to provide screening from the commercial road. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the dry stormwater pond. An existing row of 12'+ tall pine trees will be preserved at the west end of the cottage home private cul de sac as well as additional coniferous trees. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 ft. The landscape plans have been revised to include a 6 foot high wood privacy fence along the lot line. Trees and landscaping are also proposed in the 30 foot buffer. A 40 foot wide berm and landscape buffer is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. Municipal Utilities • All new development must have sanitary sewer and water service. Possible exceptions prior to the availability of utilities include renovation of existing structures if the building code allows it without utilities. However, the preference is for all uses in the study area to have municipal utilities. The entire Lyngblomsten senior living community, cottage homes, restaurant and commercial development will be served by municipal utilities. • Several options exist for utility service, as described in this study document. West of Hodgson, the preference is for connection to the Woodridge Lane sanitary sewer. City watermain and sanitary sewer force main will be extended from Woodridge Lane through a 20 foot wide utility easement obtained by the City over 255 Ash Street, 275 Ash Street (now owned by Lyngblomsten) and a portion of the old 49 Club. A lift station is also being constructed. A 12" watermain extends down the public road and 8" watermain serves the cottage homes, senior living community and commercial areas. The 4" sanitary sewer has been revised to an 8" sanitary sewer main to service the area. 13 Utilities will be stubbed under CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) to serve future development to the east. • Water trunk lines must be looped, and development must provide the looping. Watermain will be extended north along Hodgson Road to connect and loop at Linda Avenue as part of a City trunk watermain project. The watermain is also looped around the senior living campus. Site Design, Urban Form • The intent is to create an urban form for the area. The main senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building have been intentionally pulled towards Hodgson Road and CR J for multiple reasons. One is to create an edge and urban form along the corridor as required by the Master Plan. Two, the building locations were also in response to the Woodridge and Rohavic Oaks neighborhood's concern regarding proximately of the buildings, noise, buffers etc. to their homes. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the north and west to the 2-story skilled care wing with the 3- and 4-story buildings closest to Hodgson Road. Three, the building shift also maximizes site design and efficiency. The senior living campus setback tapers from 30.97 ft to 2-6 33.68 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. The restaurant setback tapers from 35 ft to 15 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. The commercial building and fast food setback is 44 35 ft from the Hodgson Road property line and M 35 ft from the Ash Street property line. These building locations and setbacks are consistent with the Master Plan. • Development layouts are to include buildings at intersection corners to establish the "cornerstones" of the area's urban form. The main senior living campus at the southwest corner of Hodgson Road and the future public road creates a corner stone at that intersection. A Lyngblomsten monument sign at the north side of the public road also creates a strong corner. The future commercial building at the Hodgson Road and CR J intersection is also consistent with the Master Plan's gateway and cornerstone vision by providing the space for a community entrance sign and promenade. • As another means ofpursuing an urban form, development is to avoid lining Hodgson with large parking lots. This could include the following elements. 14 o Buildings fronting along Hodgson in addition to the cornerstone buildings o Extensive landscaping and screening of parking lots will be required along Hodgson and CR J, including boulevard trees and decorative fencing or walls. Landscaping must be included on the street side offences or walls along parking lots. The parking lots for the senior living campus, restaurant and commercial building are internal to the development and not located along Hodgson Road and CR J. They are setback a minimum of 15 ft from the internal public road property line. One larger parking lot with joint parking facilities and cross easements ' has been created between Phase 2 (restaurant) and Phase 3 (commercial building). • Larger parking areas should be planned with internal landscaping, pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible: o Pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a commercial building; o Walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel on the route to an entrance of a commercial building. The senior living parking lot includes landscaped islands and the perimeter along the public road is landscaped and screened with shrubs and trees. The sidewalk along the public road connects to a sidewalk leading to the main building for pedestrian connectivity. Future development of the restaurant and commercial building will require similar connections. • Sidewalks are to be constructed on both sides of Hodgson Road and on the north side of Co. Rd. J to form connections to the trails to the development areas and contribute to the urban form of the area. An 9 8.5 foot wide path is being constructed along the west side of Hodgson Road. A trail and/or sidewalk will be required on the east side of Hodgson Road when that area develops. A trail and/or- ,aoee f-ative sidewalk will also be constructed along CR J in etio,, with development f the eo al bui din- -. in the first phase of development. Upon development of the commercial building and corner gateway, decorative sidewalk may be incorporated into the design in conjunction with the trail. • Pedestrian circulation should be an important design factor within the development areas to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle circulation among businesses and residential sites. Such circulation routes must be safe and aesthetically pleasing. 15 Safe pedestrian corridors are provided throughout the development between the residential and commercial uses via trails and sidewalks. • Design guidelines must be prepared for any new development project in the area. Developers should submit draft guidelines with development applications. Design guidelines for each project must include attention to previous projects in order to coordinate design throughout the study area. After being refined in collaboration with City staff, design requirements shall be incorporated into the approval of the development. Design Guidelines will be have been prepared with the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. Overall development shall be is consistent with the Master Plan. As a starting point, the Lyngblomsten site plan slat has been used to establish the building and parking lot setbacks (i.e. the building envelope). Resolution No. 19-42 details the building and parking setbacks. Other parameters that shall be included in the Design Guidelines include: • Gateway Elements o The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Such elements may include: ■ Community Entrance Sign with City Logo ■ Promenade with seating, public space, decorative pavers or stamped concrete and extensive landscaping ■ Public art • Architectural Standards • Building Heights o To the greatest extent possible, building heights shall be tiered from lowest to highest, west to east towards Hodgson Road. • Master Landscape Plan • Master Signage Plan • Buildings must be designed with `four-sided architecture ", using the same quality materials on all sides. All facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other details to add visual interest. o Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of the building. Roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible 16 o The front fagade may have a unique design or more significant glazing. There have been some changes to exterior materials and design of the senior building; however, the final design meets the Master Plan criteria and is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plans. The senior living campus still incorporates "four-sided architecture". All sides of the building include the same quality stone/masonry, wand horizontal and vertical composite siding and glass. A "wood" composite siding has also been incorporated into the design. A stone ledge cornice element was added between the stone and the siding to better differentiate between the materials. The building layout was designed to limit blank walls facing the street. The separate wings of the building help to break up the massing as well as transition intensity from west to east on the site. The cottage home front fagade includes a front porch, recessed garage, stone base and eempesiEte LP Smartside siding. More architectural detail is provided further in the staff report. Detailed site and building plan review will be required upon development of the restaurant and commercial building. • Commercial buildings must incorporate trash and service areas within the buildings rather than utilizing outdoor enclosures. This will conserve land and maximize the potential for outdoor seating and pedestrian friendly amenities. The original architectural site plan indicated a detached 15' x 20' x 8' trash enclosure structure on the south end of the senior building. The glans have been revised and all The generator, trash compactor and dumpsters are now located at the bottom of the parking garage entry and loading dock approximately 7 ft below grade. Decorative fencing and coniferous trees will provide additional screening. The Master Plan specifically references "commercial buildings" with the intent to conserve land and maximize outdoor seating. The commercial buildings for the development are located near the intersection of CSAH 49 and CR J. The senior living building is a residential independent living and care facility and would not be subject to this requirement. • It is not the intent of this plan to specify housing unit styles. However, garage units must not access directly onto the main access drive or the main public streets through the development. The cottage homes garages access onto a 26 foot wide private drive not the main public street. 17 • The Hodgson/Co Rd J intersection is a gateway and appropriate elements are to be included in the development of the corners of this intersection. Future development of the commercial corner will require these gateway elements. • The interface between new residential and commercial uses should be flexible. For example, new development in central areas can be multi family, commercial, or mixed use. This would be consistent with the flexible land use lines noted above. Maintaining safety and quality of life are important considerations. The site design transitions from single story cottage homes on the west and north to the 2- story skilled care wing with the 3- and 4-story assisted -living and independent living wings closest to Hodgson Road. Intensity of development transitions from low near the existing single family neighborhood to high near the intersection. The senior living complex is also an employment center. • Lighting is to be appropriately scaled to a pedestrian friendly development. Lighting should be directed downward and screened to reduce light pollution, glare, and impacts on adjacent residential areas. Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex. Street lights ranging ffe 12 to 28 25 foot in height with down lit shields will be utilized in the parking lot and near the main entrance and loading area. Foot candles do not exceed 1.0 fc onto right-of-way as required by City performance standards. Two Five 4-5 25 foot pole street lights with down lit shields are proposed along the private road and parking areas in the cottage home neighborhood. The photometric plan indicates zero (0) foot candle levels protruding onto adjacent residential properties as required. The applicant shall work with the local electric company to design a street lighting plan for the public road. • Security or service lighting should be limited in coverage area and designed to reduce glare. Wall mounted down lit lighting is proposed on the exterior of the senior housing complex and clubhouse. Stormwater Management Stormwater management design must incorporate filtration and infiltration elements. This could include such features as rain gardens, swales, dry creeks, infiltration chambers, and other ecologically based methods along with more traditional ponds and pipes. • Stormwater management ponds, if used, should be designed to be a site amenity, including appropriate landscape elements. Per the revised Storm Water Management Report prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates dated Mar -eh July 13, 2020, rate control is being accomplished using a combination of a dry pond and a storm water treatment pond. The dry pond is now located where the original community gardens were proposed. The proposed rate is less than 80% of the existing rate of runoff. Water quality treatment is accomplished at the single stormwater treatment pond. True infiltration was considered during the design phase, but several factors contributed to not pursuing infiltration practices. First, shallow groundwater exists on site. According to the soil borings, groundwater is in the 895 to 897 elevation range. A majority of the low points are around elevation 905 with one parking lot having a low point of about 902.5. This would mean the surface of an infiltration area would need to be at elevation 900 - 901 for effective drainage to occur. Additionally, the site has been maximized and there is not adequate space for effective infiltration practices. Instead, a stormwater pond has been constructed. The stormwater pond, in addition to providing rate control, has been sized to provide adequate dead storage below the normal water level to meet water quality requirements. Finally, an irrigation pumping station will be constructed at the stormwater pond to draw water from the pond to irrigate the surrounding areas. As detailed in the May 11, 2020 Council staff report and Resolution No. 22-44 approving PUD Development Stage Plan Amendment #1 to the site plan and grading & drainage plan, the clubhouse was omitted in order to enlarge to the stormwater pond to provide more capacity. Pond Size Comparison Original Pond 3P Enlarged Pond 3P Surface Area 0.56 acres 1 0.82 acres Volume 2.810 acre ft 3.869 acre ft RCWD issued an amended Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) on March 13, 2020. The District Engineer finds the revised grading and stormwater management plans compliant with RCWD rules. The City's stormwater management ordinance requires 4 ft of separation between low floor freeboard and groundwater. In order to minimize the site being built up to meet this requirement, this separation distance may be reduced upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that 19 potential ground water inflow will be adequately mitigated. Said mitigation shall be approved by the City Engineer. As supported by Resolution No. 19-42, Braun Intertec submitted a Sub -Slab Drainage System Design. The drainage system will mitigate potential future groundwater infiltration into the lowest level of the senior building. The plan is being reviewed by the City Engineer and Building Official. as a site amenity. The clubhouse has been omitted from the project. Additional Site Plan Review Building Footprints and Floor Areas A summary of the building footprints and square footages is as follows: uilding Footpri ML Total Floor Area Cottage Homes 44, N 1,480 sf 'N 1,480sf Clubhouse 34 00-sf Omitted 4,609-s€ Omitted Senior Living Building 76,713 79,518 sf 292,462 287,055 sf Future Restaurant' 6,000 sf 6,000 sf Future Commercial' 16,000 sf 16,000 sf Future Fast Food' 2,000 sf 2,000 sf 'These building footprints and total square footages may change upon final design. Setbacks Cottage Home Neighborhood The cottage home neighborhood consists of 20 single family homes accessed via a 26 foot wide private road. A 5 foot wide sidewalk is shown on the south side of the road. The houses on the north side of the road are setback 23 ft from the curb, 30 ft from the north Rohavic Oaks property line and 40 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. Houses on the south side of the road that have sidewalks are setback 23 ft from the sidewalk. The 23 foot setback allows for the parking of 2 vehicles side by side in the driveway without encroaching into the road or sidewalk. The rear setback of these houses is 25 ft to the public road right-of-way line. It should be noted that during the PUD Development Stage Plan review, the 23 ft setback was measured to the garage, not the house. The cottage homes have a 3 ft recessed garage and a 6 ft deep porch on the front. The front porch shall be at least 14 ft behind either the curb or sidewalk, whichever is closer (23 ft garage — 3 ft house bump out — 6 ft deep porch = 14 ft). ►� 1 It should also be noted the rear patios are at grade concrete slabs and may encroach into the rear setback. This is similar to a single family accessory structure deck or patio. There shall be is a minimum of 10 ft of separation between each house. Each lot is platted to include the building footprint (including front porch and rear patio) plus a 5 foot envelope around the footprint perimeter. The preliminary plat includes a Cottage Detail. Clubhouse eerP�:eerr��ass!�rs►��i�:e��ers_ses!�� s PER- WN As discussed, the clubhouse has been omitted in order to enlarge the stormwater pond to create more storage. Senior Living Campus As previously discussed, the setbacks along Hodgson Road and CR J are driven by the Master Plan's intent to create an urban form for the area. The senior living campus setback varies from 30.97 ft to 26.74 33.68 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. Along the northern boundary of the lot, the building corner is 42 11.53ft from the property line and increases to 45 ft. Along the western boundary, the building corner is also 4-2 14.41 ft from the property line and increases to 45 ft. Along the south boundary, the building setback is 20 ft from the paved private road and 6 ft from the sidewalk. The parking lot is setback 15 ft from the property line. Restaurant and Commercial Development As discussed, full site and building plan review will be required for development of the restaurant and commercial buildings. Per the proposed site plan for Phase 2 and 3, the restaurant setback tapers from 35 ft to 15 ft from the Hodgson Road property line. An outdoor patio is shown adjacent to the property line and 5-10 ft from the paved trail. The commercial building setback is 44 35 ft from the Hodgson Road property line and -30 35 ft from the Ash Street property line. On the PUD Final Plans, a fast food restaurant with a driveway thru is shown to the west of the commercial pad. Per Ordinance No. 07-19, restaurants are allowed uses; however, accessory drive -through facilities require a conditional use permit. A full site and building plan review are required that meet all performance standards of the ordinance, 49/J Master Plan and Design Standards. 21 Architecture Detailed architectural comments were provided by Landform and City staff. The following is a summary. Overall, the proposed development upholds architectural standards envisioned by the Master Plan and is consistent with zoning ordinance performance standards. Cottage Homes The 2 bedroom, single level cottage homes are 4-8 20 ft in height (24 ft to roof peak). The floor area is 44, W 1,480sf. Exterior materials include a stone,.. as nfy manufactured stone base, glass, leemplasite LP Smartside siding and 4" trim, decorative garage door and decorative louver. The 2 Vx 2r 20' 10" x 20' 10" garage is recessed 2.6 ft behind the front facade. The color palette includes -2 3 primary colors, evening blue, mountain sage and g_rgy and an accent color of cobble stone. The Design Standards include an anti - monotony plan. The front porch has been revised to 6 ft deep and the rear patio has been revised to 10' x IWas required. Detailed building plans have been provided with PUD Final Plan. Clubhouse As discussed, the clubhouse has been omitted in order to enlarge the stormwater pond to create more storage. Senior Living Complex In order to address revisions in final building design, structural details and floorplan layout, there have been some changes to exterior elevations, materials and height; however, the final design meets the Master Plan criteria and is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plans. The multi -storied complex has varying heights that tier from the 2-story skilled care wing to the 3-story assisted -living wing to the 4-story independent living wing. Decorative parapets accent the rooflines. In order to achieve desired 9 ft ceilings, the building height (top of wall) has increased 3 ft 6in in the independent living wing. The parapet heights were also increased. The finished floor elevation (FFE) of the first floor (Level 1) is 910.5 EL and that has not changed. Below is a comparison of the preliminary and final building and parapet heights: Building Height Comparison 22 April 2019 May 2020 August 2020 Change Top of Wall + (May 2020 Top of Wall + Parapet = Top of Wall + Parapet = to August Parapet = Total Total 2020) Total 2 story-SC/MC 23' + 2' = 25' 25'3"+ 2' 11"=28'2" 25'3"+ 2' 11"= 28'2" 0 3 story -AL 33' + 4' = 37' 35' 10"+1'5" = 37'3" 35' 10" + 2'4" = 38'2" +0' 11" 4 story -IL 43' + 3' = 46' 4656" + 296" = 4950" 4616" + 4' 0" = 5016" +1' 6" Main Entrance 43' + 5' = 48' 4616" + 216" = 4910" 5056" + 1' 8" = 52' 2" +3' 2" Per Resolution No. 19-42, Section III. Height Regulations: B. Senior Living Campus No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty-five (45) ft in height or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four (4) stories or forty-five (45) ft— except as allowed by § 1007.043 (3). Section 1007.043 (3) allows for parapet walls extending not more than four (4) ft above the limiting height of the building. The 4 story building height (top of wall) is 46' 6" plus 21" 4'0" parapet equals " 50'6". In summary, the building and parapet heights meet the requirements of both the zoning ordinance and Resolution No. 19-42. Exterior materials have been revised from stone/masonry, metal siding, glass and composite siding to manufactured stone veneer, fiber cement siding (2 colors), wood look fiber cement siding and glass. More specifically as detailed in the Design Guidelines: • Manufactured Stone Veneer o Ohio Blue Vein Cut Stone • Hardieplank Siding o Evening Blue o Artic White • Fiberon Siding (wood look) W,,,.,v, Siep , , Ipe • Black window frame, dark bronze storefront, metal parapet cap The blue horizontal siding and white vertical siding provide contrast and the wood horizontal siding provides a natural look. Articulation and depth in the buildings elevations is achieved with vertical bump outs, shadow lines, cornices and decorative parapets. 23 The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 33% of the exterior walls have an exterior finish of brick, stucco or stone. The elevations include stefle4.,,.,sonf . manufactured stone veneer of ranging from 38 430%, 38.60% 35.20,;36.2% which exceeds ordinance requirements. The building has multiple fagades, varying exteriors materials, textures and strong vertical and horizontal lines that provide articulation and depth and break up what could be long monotonous walls. Parkin The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum number of parking stalls per use, as follows: • Townhome, Quadraminium, Manor Home, Multiple Family Dwellings, and Mobile Homes within Mobile Home Parks. At least two and one-fourth (2-1/4) rent-free spaces per unit. In projects involving eight (8) or more units, the City may require additional clustered guest parking spaces based upon calculation of required demand. The cottage home neighborhood is served by a 26 foot wide private road with no on - street parking; therefore, off-street parking has been provided. The 20 cottage homes require 45 parking stalls. Each cottage home has parking for 4 vehicles (2 in the garage and 2 in the driveway) for a total of 80 parking stalls. Two off-street guest parking areas also provide an additional 11 parking stalls for a total of 91 parking stalls. Parking requirements for the cottage home and ehibhettse neighborhoods are met. • Elderly (Senior Citizen) Housing. Reservation of area equal to one (1) parking space per unit. Initial development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2) space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated. There are 4-00 96 independent living units that would require 4-00 96 parking stalls. • Rest Home, Nursing Home, Convalescent Center, or Institution. One (1) space for each six (6) beds based upon maximum design capacity, plus one (1) space for each two (2) employees. There are -50 35 assisted -living beds, 48 56 skilled care beds, 16 memory care beds and 35 employees that would require 35 parking stalls. The Town Center common use area is 7,521 ' 4,' 85 14,596sf. If this were a stand-alone community center, 48 parking stalls would be required. However, these amenities will be used mostly by the Lyngblomsten residents and on occasion, members of the general public; therefore 48 separate parking stalls dedicated to just the Town Center would not be required. 24 The total required number of parking stalls for the senior campus building is 131. There are 159 stalls provided. Assuming 50% general public use of the Town Center amenities at one time (48/2=24), only 155 stalls would be required. Parking requirements are met. Senior Living Campus Parking Stall Summary # Stalls Required # Stalls Provided Elderly Housing (IL units) 96 82 (underground) Nursing Home (AL + SC +MC) 35 77 (surface lot) Subtotal 131 159 Town Center (50%) 24 TOTAL 911F A 159 • Restaurants, Cafes, Private Clubs Serving Food and/or Drinks, Bars, On -Sale Nightclubs. Ten (10) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square ft of dining room, plus one (1) space for each employee of the maximum work shift. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the dining room square footage; however, assuming a 6,000 sf restaurant has 3,000 sf of dining room + 10 employees, 40 parking stalls would be required. The proposed 1,200 sf outdoor dining patio would require an additional 7 stalls for a total of 47 parking stalls. • Retail Store and Service Establishment. At least one (1) off-street parking space for each two hundred (200) square ft of floor area. Detailed building plans will be required to verify the floor area of the proposed commercial building; however, the commercial pad as shown is approximately 16,000sf and 72 parking stalls would be required. • Fast Food Restaurant. Fifteen (15) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square ft of gross floor area. The final plan now includes a potential 2,000 sf fast food restaurant that would require 30 stalls. Future Commercial Development Parkins Stall Summary Use # Stalls Required # Stalls Provided Restaurant (6,000 sf + 1,200 patio) 47 48 (joint) Retail (16,000 sf) 72 59 (joint) 25 The total number of required stalls is 149. The final plan shows 153 stalls. Joint parking facilities with shared curb cuts and access drives have been provided between the restaurant, commercial building and fast food restaurant. Tree Preservation Plan Per the Tree Survey (Sheets 1-2), there are 1,685 significant trees located on the 20 acre site. Sheet L0.1, Tree Preservation Plan identifies the basic use area. Of the 1,685 significant trees, 201 will be preserved and 1,484 will be removed. The majority of the trees being preserved are along the west boundary providing a tree buffer between the Woodridge neighborhood and the development. The Tree Preservation Plan has been revised to exclude the stormwater pond and wetland buffer from the basic use area. There are 4-3q 152 trees being removed in non -environmentally sensitive areas that require 213 trees for mitigation. Trees being removed within the wetland buffer shall be mitigated at the Natural Resource Conservation Area ratio. The Tree Mitigation table shall be has been revised. There are 32 trees in a Natural Resource Conservation Area or Natural Resource Corridor Enhancement area that will require 67 mitigation trees. In summary, 280 (213 + 67) mitigation trees are required and 376 mitigation trees are being planted. Tree Preservation and Mitigation requirements are met. Landscaping Canopy Cover Canopy Cover standards require the minimum canopy cover to be 40% for all uses. Canopy cover is required for the senior living campus, clubhouse, restaurant and commercial development. The restaurant and commercial development will be reviewed upon submission of detailed plans. The senior living campus has 42,956 sf of hardcover which requires 17,182 sf of canopy coverage. 17,900 sf have been provided. The of-iginal Plan Sheet L2.1 indieated 17,450 sf of eever-age provided; however-, the mediumrtfees were insefFeEtly valued at 500 and not '� ccz�v-zae valueshave beeeeffeeted. Plan Sheet L2.1 indieates 17,450 sf of eever-age provided whieh meets meat. 26 ! ee��«rff!�r�esrs�ss!trs. .r_�sWs VA •11 T I Foundation Landscaping Foundation Landscaping standards require 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs per 100 linear ft of the building. The senior living campus has 1,981 linear ft of building fagade requiring 40 large trees and 119 large shrubs. The landscape plan proposes 63 large 4ee !eats and 304 large sh.ub e alen4s whieh o ee ro v en4s 42 large trees equivalents and 387 large shrub equivalents. The landscape plan also provides for several outdoor landscaped courtyards. The trees along Hodgson Road have been relocated out of the road right-of-way and within 30 ft of the building. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas include disturbed site areas, such as cul de sac islands, boulevard medians, storm water management areas, common areas in multifamily sites that are not for recreation facilities, and disturbed areas that are not located within the foundation landscape zone, vehicular hardscape area or the building footprint. Open Space landscaping standards require 1 large tree and 3 large shrubs per 2,000 square ft. Open space plantings are required for the main building, stormwater ponds, and north and south green spaces. Per Sheet L2.1 and L2-4 L2.2, Main Building, there is 45,3 74 45,063 square ft of open space. This would require 23 large trees and 69 large shrubs. The plan proposes 36 large tree equivalents and 155 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met and exceeded. The North East and North West Green Spaces, found on Sheet L2.6, hosts ' (1� 23,000 square ft and 54,073 square ft, respectively. The North East Greenspace requires 4-0 12 large trees and -30 36 large shrubs to meet the open space landscaping standards. The North West Greenspace requires 27 large trees and 80 large shrubs. The landscaping plan provides 4-8 12 large tree equivalents and 97 48 large shrubs equivalents for the North East Green space and 27 large tree equivalents and 80 large shrubs equivalents for the North West Green Space, which meets the open space requirements. Per Sheet L2.7, there is 5 1,926 84,699 square ft of open space in the South West Greenspace. This would require 2-6 43 large trees and 79 127 large shrubs. The plan proposes 2-05 202 large tree equivalents and 4-" 230 large shrub equivalents. Open space requirements are met; however- the ,.la shoot notes 28 t-roos and 84 sh. dbs ., o ,.o,a This shall be , etea 27 In addition to meeting the open space requirements, the developer is including three extensively landscaped courtyard areas around the senior housing building for the enjoyment of the residents. Buffer and Screen Standards Buffer and Screen Standards require a 6 foot high screen between a development and any adjacent, less intense, residential land use. Materials to meet this ordinance can include year round continuous planting screen, a wall or fence and plantings which cover 50% of a wall or fence on the exterior side, or a combination of berm and year round continuous screening. A 50 foot wide buffer of existing trees along the west lot line abutting Woodridge Estates will be preserved. A screen of lilac bushes will be planted at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the stormwater pond. Additional landscape screening shall be planted in the area adjacent to 253 and 255 Woodridge Lane to provide more screening from the road and parking lots. The piibfie read fight of way near- GR i has shifted to the east. approximately 10 nn ft. Gateway Drive has shifted to the west approximately 50 ft to align with St. Albans Street to the south This will allow for- additional landseape buff-e and allow the existing spFuee tree line adjaeent to 275 Ash Stfeet to be preserved.- A triangulated row of coniferous trees will be planted along the east lot line of 275 Ash Street. Along the north property line adjacent to the Rohavic Oaks neighborhood, the cottage homes will be setback a minimum of 30 ft and a 6 foot high wood privacy fence will be located along the north lot line. A 40 foot wide buffer with a 3 foot berm and landscape plantings is also provided in the cottage home neighborhood adjacent to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road). The plan has been revised to include a year round continuous screen on top of the berm. A 30 inch shrub hedge is proposed between the senior living campus parking lot and public road right-of-way as is required by ordinance. A 3 foot berm is located on the north side of the northeast private cottage home parking area. Coniferous trees and shrubs are planted along the top of the berm. Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per 70 linear ft of road frontage where property fronts on any public roads for townhome or multiple family homes. There ee#age home private read has 33 boulevard trees w-hieh exeeed or-dinanee requirements. There is 2,080 linear- ft of publie read (Stfeet A) that abtAs the sellier- living eamptis an ffiture restaufai�A and eemmer-eial. This would require 30 bettlevaM trees. There afe 33 of privatezoad (Street B) that would r-equ r '�Rlevtrees. There a'�betilei The 20 Cottage homes have 1,869 linear ft of frontage. This would require 27 boulevard trees and 35 boulevard trees are provided. Gateway Drive (Street A) has 2,750 linear ft of frontage. This would require 37 boulevard trees and 41 trees have been provided. The private commercial street (Street B) has 789 linear ft of frontage. This would require 11 boulevard trees and 13 trees have been provided. The landscape plan has been revised so trees are not located within the Hodgson Road right-of-way; however, Sheet L2.1 shall be revised so coniferous trees are at least 15 ft from the trail and deciduous trees are at least 10 ft from the trail. Boulevard tree requirements have been met. Side Sheet L2.6, NE Greenspace Plan indicates an entrance monument sign on the north side of the public road. The sign area is landscaped and it outside of the 100 foot vision triangle. Sheet A17, Signage Exterie A5.708 provides detail of a monument sign. The sign is 64n 10'4" high and 23 20' 6" ft long. Materials include sandblasted eo"ere*e an stone stone veneer base, metal "boy blue" face and metal coping to match the senior building color and material palette. A separate Sign Permit Application is required for all wall signs and monument signs. The senior building proposes a vertical wall sign on north side of the building. The applicant has expressed a strong interest in "branding" the development. A master sign plan for the 20 acre site is required and shall be has been incorporated into the Design Standards. This master sign plan should include a City of Lino Lakes gateway sign/monument at the intersection of Hodgson Road and CR J. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed impervious surface coverage in a mixed use area is 75%. The proposed 49.6% post -development impervious surface coverage is compliant. Per the Mar -eh 204-9 May 8, 2020 Storm Water Management Plan: Pre -Development Post -Development 0 aefes 0 Impervious 2.67 acres 10.5% 12.54 acres 49.6% 29 Pervious 0 aer-es0 22.62 acres (89.5%) 12.75 acres (50.4%) 20.73 acres ( 00-1 ) 20.73 acres (1001,46) TOTAL AREA 25.29 acres (100%) 25.29 acres (100%) Traffic Study No changes are required to the traffic study. The proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,473 daily trips. 69 trips are estimated to be generated in the AM peak period (7:00 to 8:00) and 123 trips in the PM peak (4:30 to 5:30). A detailed traffic analysis was completed to describe the operating conditions of intersections surrounding the site in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter designations from "A" (best operating conditions) to "F" (worst conditions). A Level of Service "D" represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection conditions during a peak hour. City Code establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The Code states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision will not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D it will not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. The traffic analysis evaluated four surrounding intersections adjacent to the project area. • Co Rd J at Woodbridge Ln • Co Rd J at St. Albans St • Co Rd J at Hodgson Rd • Hodgson Rd at Rohavic Ln As discussed in the WSB Transportation Memorandum, dated February 6, 2019, all intersections, meet the City Code requirements. However, it was noted that the worst movement at the CR J and Hodgson intersection, during the PM peak period, changed from a LOS D to LOS E. The proposed southbound Hodgson Road right turn lane, at CR J adequately mitigates for this degradation. Additionally, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have been working together the with the applicant or the past 2+ years on right- of-way acquisition, access points and intersection improvements. Lyngblomsten hired SEH to prepare an Intersection Analysis and Alternatives report for the entire CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection and preliminary concept plans provide for additional turn lanes to mitigate traffic and improve overall intersection operations. Both roads are County roads and ultimately fall under their jurisdiction 30 Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat, comprehensive plan and Master Plan. Blocks and Lots Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 5 7 existing parcels (Lyngblomsten purchased 275 Ash Street). These parcels are ' now owned by Lyngblomsten. r . gbl..mste„ , ently has p ,-,.hase agr-eefflen4s ; plaee with all n ewners—.The senior living community and restaurant are located on one existing 17 acre parcel. The future commercial development will be a redevelopment of the remaining 5 6 parcels (3 acres) which is currently occupied by an insurance business, vacant liquor store and recently demolished 49 Club. if tefims o-fpur-ehase-agreement for- tleaer-e eemmer-eial par -eel are not finalized between the private paffies, the pr-efiminafy p! eould be revised and the final plat presented with just the one 17 aer-e par -eel that eentains the senior- living eampus and r-estatwan4. The 3 aer-e par -eel wetild need to pessi* pr-eliminafy plat and final plat at a faffe date-. The revised Leh 11, 2 May 11, 2020 preliminary plat is summarized below. Lot or Outlot Size purpose Ownership Square Ft AkAcre Lots 1-20, Block 1 Typ. 4,161 sf 0.10 acres 20 cottage homes Lyngblomsten Lot 21, Block 1 194,214 sf 4.46 acres Common open Lyngblomsten space Lot 1, Block 2 181,122 sf 4.16 acres Senior living Lyngblomsten campus Lot 2, Block 2 53,044 sf 1.22 acres Future restaurant Lyngblomsten Lot 3, Block 2 30,800 sf 0.71 acres Future skilled Lyngblomsten care win Outlot A 102,547 sf 2.35 acres Stormwater pond Lyngblomsten Outlot B 16,977 sf 0.39 acres Open space/lift Lyngblomsten station Outlot C 93,809 sf 2.15 acres Future commercial Lyngblomsten TOTAL acres 31 Lyngblomsten will be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of the majority of the development. The cottage home common area and senior living grounds will be professionally landscaped and maintained. Final Plat The final plat is being platted in the same lot, block and outlot configuration as the preliminary plat. Streets and Alleys CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) are A Minor Expander arterial roads. The development is served by an internal public road and 2 private roads. The streets and transportation plans are detailed previously in this report. As noted above, the 3 aefe eofmner-eial site is tmder- a separate pufehase agfeement with will tempor-ar-ily tefminate as a eul de sae near- CR i (Ash Street) tffi4iI futufe developmen Lyngblomsten successfully acquired the 3 acre commercial parcels and 275 Ash Street. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 ft wide are provided on Lot 4-7 21, Block 1 and Lots 1-3, Block 2. Drainage and utility easements are provided over Outlot A and Outlot B. Outlot C shall also include the standard 10 ft easement. A separate public trail easement will be provided over the trail, private road and sidewalk in the cottage home neighborhood and over the trail along CR J (Ash Street). The trail along CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) is located within the right-of-way. Powerline A three-phase overhead power line runs along the eastern boundary of the property line within the right-of-way. Another power line runs along the south boundary. Lyngblomsten is working with the electric company to discuss burying the power lines. Public Land Dedication The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication. Per the City's Park, Greenway & Trail System Plan, a neighborhood park is not programmed for this area. Trail construction throughout the development and along Hodgson Road and CR J will be credited. the f edity's resideThe clubhouse has been omitted. The City's current Park Dedication fees are $3,000 $3,150 per residential unit and $2,400 $2,520 per acre for commercial/industrial development. The senior building is a mix of both independent 32 living units (residential) and assisted -living and skilled care facility units (commercial). The cottage home and independent living units will be charged as residential units. The assisted -living units and skilled care facilities will be charged as commercial users. This practice is consistent with previous assisted -living facilities constructed in the City. The assisted -living units and skilled fnemery eafe faeififies occupy approximately half of the 4.47 4.16 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 2) and will be charged at 244 2.08 acres. Fees are collected when land is final platted into lots and blocks. Future development of Outlot C (commercial pad) will be charged park dedication fees on an acreage basis at the time of final plat. Le al Description Total # Units or Acres Fee per Unit or Acre Total Cottage Homes Lots 1-20, Block 1 20 units $3,150 $63,000 Independent Living IL Lot 1, Block 2 96 units $3,150 $302,400 Assisted Living AL & Memory Care MC Lot 1 Block 2 2.08 acres $2,520 $5 242 Skilled Care SC Lot 3, Block 2 0.71 acres $2,520 $1,789 Restaurant Lot 2, Block 2 1.22 acres $2,520 $3,074 Commercial outlot C Future acres $0 $0 Trail Credit TOTAL (39,500) $336,005 Comprehensive Plan Per the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the 20 acre site is located in Planning District 1. As discussed, a Master Plan was prepared for the mixed use area at CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) and approved by Council in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent the Master Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the Master Plan as detailed in this staff report and is therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is not warranted. The threshold computation of unattached units (20 cottage homes) and attached units (100 1L =4 5 0 AE 96 IL +35 AL) is less than one. Wetlands A small 0.28 acre wetland exists in the northwest corner of the site. A wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental in June 2018. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on October 3, 2018. The wetland is not part of the Wetland Management Corridor and formal recorded conservation easement documents or declarations are not required. The City will instead require a minimum 25 foot wide wetland buffer and signage via Council resolution. There are no wetland impacts. 33 Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review As discussed, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have spent several years working with the applicant on right-of-way needs and access points to the development. Adequate right-of-way is being dedicated along both CSAH 49 and CR J. Anoka County and Ramsey County are analyzing turn lane options along these corridors that are outside the scope of the Lyngblomsten project. During the PUD Concept Plan Review, the City of Shoreview commented the development should be served by City of Lino Lakes utilities. This has been accommodated. Shoreview also expressed traffic and access concerns along CR J and recommended a traffic study be required. A traffic study has since been completed and distributed to all agencies. The City also noted the need for trail connections along which has been addressed. Overall land uses are compatible. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the land use application on February 6, 2019. Overall comments were positive. The Board recommended attention be given to the stormwater pond infiltration, wetland buffer signs, landscape buffers and screening. Public Safety Comments The Police Division reviewed the proposed development. With the proposed turn lanes on Hodgson Road and CR J into the site, there does not appear to be any public safety concerns at this time. Further analysis of additional turn lanes along CR J was encouraged and has been provided. The Fire Division reviewed the proposed development and had the following comments: 1. Add a I+ydr-afft to the east side of the of the driveway for- the tMder-gr-etind gafage Hydrant has been added. possibly) Clubhouse has been omitted. ' . Hydrant has been added. Elevators are wide enough. Findings of Fact 34 The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: 1. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. 2. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and Not applicable. The final plat is comprised of a mix of cottage homes, senior living campus building and future commercial development. 3. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat have been substantially fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat for Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall maintain a 25 ft wetland buffer as depicted on Sheet C0.00, Wetland Buffer Map. a. The wetland buffer and upland habitat will consist of vegetated land, consisting primarily of plant species native to this region, that is not cultivated, cropped, pastured, mowed, fertilized, used as a site for depositing snow removed from roads, driveways or parking lots, subject to the placement of mulch or yard waste, or otherwise disturbed, except for periodic cutting or burning that promotes the health of the wetland buffer or upland habitat, actions to address disease or invasive species, or other actions to maintain or improve wetland buffer or upland habitat quality, each as approved in writing by City staff. b. The wetland buffer shall be maintained in accordance with standard vegetation management practices. 2. The developer is responsible for the installation, establishment and future maintenance of all landscaping, vegetation, fences and signage consistent with the approved PUD Final Plan. 35 3. Future development of Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot C, Lyngblomsten shall be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board for recommendation to the Council. 4. Future development of Outlot C, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes Addition shall require final plat and full site plan review. 5. Future development of Outlot C, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes shall be consistent with the 49/J Master Plan, Lyngblomsten Design Standards and city ordinances. 6. After site grading and street construction, City staff, developer and the property owners of 251 Woodridge Lane and 253 Woodridge Lane shall work together to determine the best location for a screening fence between their property and the public road. 7. A shared private road easement agreement for the Cottage Homes and Private Commercial Road shall be recorded. The following conditions/comments shall be addressed prior to Council approval: 1. Comments from WSB City Engineer letter dated August 5, 2020 shall be addressed. 2. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator letter dated June 3, 2020 shall be addressed. 3. A complete PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat plan set (78 sheets) with all correct revision dates shall be submitted to the City. 4. A complete PUD Final Plan/Final Plat plan set (130 sheets) with all correct revision dates shall be submitted to the City. 5. A shared private road easement agreement for the Cottage Homes and Private Commercial Road shall be drafted for City review and approval. 6. A revised SEH Transportation Corridor Concept Plan with 3/4 access at CR J and St. Alban Street and cost estimate breakdown shall be submitted and incorporated into the plans. 7. Design Guidelines: a. All pages shall reflect the revised site plan and building elevations. b. Page 1: Revise to Rob Rafferty, Mayor and Jeff Reinert, Former Mayor c. Page 4: i. Highlight project boundary d. Page 8: i. Legibility is difficult ii. Omit the metes and bounds legal description iii. Legal descriptions shall be revised to match new preliminary plat Lots, Blocks and Outlots e. Page 10 and 12: Legibility is difficult f. Page 11: i. Green box does not include setback from Hodgson Road. ii. Pink box should cover entire commercial pad g. Page 14: i. The gateway monument sign shall include the City's logo. h. Page 15: 36 i. Staff shall further evaluate the proposed Architectural Standards especially the Building Canopy language. i. Page 27: i. The colors on the monument sign do not match Sheet A5.708. ii. Wall signage on the senior building shall be included. j. Please provide a Word document for further City staff editing. 8. Sheet 1, Preliminary Plat: a. Under the Density Chart, the total numbers of units should be revised to 151. b. The proposed trail easement in the Cottage Home Neighborhood shall cover the entire private road and sidewalk. i. A separate recordable Trail Easement and Exhibit shall be drafted by the applicant. 9. Sheet C0.00, Wetland Buffer Map a. The City's wetland buffer sign detail sheet Gen-22 shall be included on the plan sheet. b. The location of the signs shall be revised. i. Signs shall be located at 200 ft intervals and at the edge of the 25 foot wetland buffer. 10. Sheets C1.20-C1.22, Site Plan and all other applicable sheets: a. Street names shall be shown (all private, public streets and County Roads). b. Label future restaurant, commercial and fast food buildings. c. Label and hatch mark trail. d. A 5ft wide sidewalk shall extend on the west side of Gateway Drive from the Cottage Home private road to the south driveway entrance of the senior living building. e. A crosswalk shall be installed from this sidewalk to the eastside. 11. Sheets C 1.23-C 1.25, Geometric Plan: a. Setbacks to restaurant, commercial building and fast food shall be provided. b. Size of restaurant, commercial and fast food shall be provided. c. Distance between each cottage home buildings shall be provided. d. Create a "typical" cottage home footprint with distances from house, porch and garage to street or sidewalk. i. Include notes: 1. Front porch shall be at least 14 ft from curb or sidewalk. 2. 23 ft (garage setback) - 3 ft (house bump out) - 6 ft (porch depth) = 14ft porch setback e. Setback from south side of senior living building to sidewalk and to paved private commercial road shall be provided. 12. Sheet A1.000, Basement Level Overall Floor Plan: a. Number of underground parking stalls shall be provided. 13. Sheets A5.101-A13, Exterior Elevations a. Please include revised plans. b. For the PUD Development Stage Plan, the Key Plan shall include the entire building including the skilled care wing. 37 c. Please review the Key Plan. Some of the references appear to be incorrect. 14. Sheet R3.200-R3.220, Residential (Cottage Homes): a. Air conditioning units shall be located in the rear yards. Please show location on plan sheet. 15. Final Plat: a. The standard 10 ft drainage & utility easement shall be provided over Outlot C. b. Please confirm that a "trail easement" can be dedicated on a final plat. c. The delineated wetland boundary shall be included. ATTACHMENTS 1. WSB City Engineer memo dated August 5, 2020 2. Environmental Coordinator memo dated June 3, 2020 3. Wold Narrative and 3D Color Renderings 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Final Plat 6. Civil Plan Set 7. SEH Road Concept Layout 8. Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan Set 9. Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans 10. Loading Dock Screening 7. 0 U U z w m U) 0 v 00 04 N 0 U) U) z J D a a H z a U) 0 0 w F U) H w w H U) x H rn w 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes From: Diane Hankee, PE, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes Kelsey Gelhar, EIT, WSB & Associates Date: August 5, 2020 Re: Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Plan Review, 7/31/2020 Preliminary Plat & Final Plat Submittals 012365-000 As requested by City Staff, WSB and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat for the Lyngblomsten Senior Communities site in Lino Lakes, MN. The preliminary plat plans were initially received on March 11, 2019. This memorandum is a revised version of the memorandum to Katie Larsen originally dated March 29, 2019 and that was responded to by the applicant. Preliminary and final plans were again submitted on May 11, 2020. The following comments were made on the March 2019 plans, May 2020 plans, and also on the documents below: • Stormwater Management Report prepared by AJA Inc., revised July 13, 2020, received July 31, 2020. • Final Civil Construction plans — including plan and profile views - received July 31, 2020. • SEH Preliminary Concept Plan and Preliminary Drainage plans received July 31, 2020. Applicant responses to previous comments are shown in red. Additional comments from WSB staff are shown in blue. Additional applicant comments are shown in green. The WSB comments are shown in dark blue. AJA Responses Below dated (AJA 7/1112020) in BOLD RED CAPITAL LETTERS. WSB's most recent responses are shown in bold purple letters. The following are our review comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Lyngblomsten project is proposed on a 20.74 acre site at the northwest corner of the Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and Ash Street (CR J) intersection. The City completed a master plan of this area and the area to the east of Hodgson in 2006. This development meets the goals of the master plan. Comments: • Grading Plan Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 2 The Lyngblomsten development is proposing grading of the entire site in one phase. This includes protection of an existing wetland, grading a new storm water pond, and grading roadway and site pads. The applicant shall call out the emergency overland flow (EOF) elevation (with a flow arrow) on the grading plan for the proposed pond and the existing wetland. The EOF should be 1 foot above the HWL and 3.0 feet below the lowest adjacent building opening elevation. EOF and flow arrows have been added to the grading plan. EOT- and high water level elevations hare been verified per the city comment. The low floor/opening elevations need to be labeled on the grading plan. The EOF will need to be further reviewed once other comments are addressed. It appears the trail may be blocking the EOF from the pond and culvert should be considered under the trail. Similar to the utility plan layering comment, we have been told via email to take spot elevations off of the grading plan to help with legibility. For this reason, the overall grading plan has spot elevations on to help with the above comment, but the north and south grading plan sheets do not have spot elevations shown. (AJA 2020-05.08) Low floor elevations and spot elevations should be two different labels. Please add the low floor elevation information to the lots on the north and south grading plan sheets. See Woods Edge example sent previously. AJA 7/11/2020: LOW FLOOR ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED Update C1.30 to match what was sent to Kelsey Gelhar via email on Tuesday, July 28, by Bill Diede, which showed the FFE elevations on the individual townhome lots. The applicant should provide proposed centerline street grades (either grading sheets, or in profile on street plan sheet). Profile sheets will be accomplished in the final plat phase. In the meantime, percent of slope along the gutter or centerline have been shown on the drawings Centerline profile views were not provided with final plat documents. Applicant shall submit centerline profile views that include grade and vertical curve information for review. See Woods Edge example sent via email. AJA 7/11/2020: CENTERLINE PROFILES CREATED FOR ALL STREETS. REFER TO SHEETS C1.98, C1.99, C1.100. Applicant to provide proposed profiles for all proposed streets that show vertical curve information per City ordinance. The SWPPP is being reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator. Please provide the complete SWPPP narrative. The applicant shall clearly label the top and bottom of the retaining wall along the pond. Retaining walls over 4 feet require a licensed engineering design and an approved fence. This information has been provided on sheets C1.30-C1.32. (AJA 2020-05.08) Please provide with the final plat documents a licensed engineering design for the retaining walls over 4-ft in height. Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 3 WOLD 7/11/2020: The is a delegated design item and this information will not be ready for review until this work scope is awarded to the subcontractor. The retaining wall engineering delegated design is a shop drawing requirement per the project specifications. WEIS 7/27/20: Engineering drawings for the retaining walls will be provided. The applicant has included the impervious surface area of the Hodgson turn lanes in the storm water calculations. However, they have not addressed how stormwater will be managed. There is no storm sewer system or ditch system shown, the applicant will need to coordinate the drainage plan with Anoka County also. Turn lane construction plans will be required with the final plat. This is being developed by SEH along with the details of the road design and will be provided as soon as possible. (AJA 2020-05.08) Preliminary grading of the turn lanes shall be included in with preliminary plat submittals. SEE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY GRADING DESIGN SUBMITTED BY SEH. Applicant shall review existing TOPO shots and update existing contours. Currently, the existing contours show a 10-ft hill on the west side of the intersection of Gateway and the private road. This hill does not exist. WOLD 7/11/2020: Loucks has been requested to return to the site to review the area in question. Loucks found some "bad shots" and will update the survey. • Stormwater Management The Lyngblomsten development is 20.74 acres in size, with an existing impervious area of approximately 2 acres. Majority of the site runoff is towards the west where there is an 24 inch diameter pipe outlet and to the existing wetland on site. The proposed impervious area is approximately 9.5 acres. There is a proposed pond located in the middle and east side of the site. The City adopts Rice Creek Watershed District's (RCWD) rules for water quality and quantity requirements. The applicant is proposing a stormwater reuse system that will be further reviewed with the final design. The Gurrent submittal now inGludes rate Gentrol via a combination of a dFy pond (leGated on the northwest) and a stormwater treatment pond. The submittal normal wateF level of the pond is 896, and the 100 year elevation of the p nd is of onn G CAPROC frArn ROOD has hoon nhfo•npd io io 2020_05W Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 4 The Water Reuse system will be supplemented by municipal water in low conditions: a. The applicant shall provide calculations demonstrating the amount of infiltration provided. Standard Rice Creek watershed district water reuse calculations nave been provided. The location of the re -use system pump and connection to city water shall be shown on the utility plan with backflow prevention. The mechanical engineer has been recently hired by the owner and this will be addressed as soon as possible. (AJA 2020-05.08) b. Provide an elevation (below the NWL) that the irrigation system will need to switch to City water during dry periods. The elevation has been labeled on the plan The applicant shall submit their allowable pump down elevation. Please identify where on the plan this is included. If a pond liner is being proposed please include information on the grading plan or other. Pond Liner information can be found on detail 11 on sheet C2.11. (AJA 2020- 05.08) Confirm the allowable pump down elevation. The stormwater reuse system design and details shall be submitted by June 19, 2020 for review prior to final plat approval. AJA 7/11/2020: PUMP DOWN ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN ON LOADING DOCK TANK DETAIL Loading dock tank detail does not control the stormwater pond re -use system. Please show the pump down elevation of the stormwater pond (the lowest the elevation pond will be allowed to be pumped down using the irrigation system) on the plan sheet for the pond. Provide water balance analysis showing how this elevation was determined. C. With the final design additional detail will be required and reviewed. This is noted Wold to provide final design Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 5 The WaR set shall shO-I.A.f the steffn sewer WaR vvei.v aind easement lines nein the same page. This will allnew the f ity to verify all storm earl utility o eRts o GOFFeGt. The plan shoots hero been modified Gaspmpnts ....ill he reviewed with the final rips ign submittal. Easements are not shown with call out on the plans, but the City has verified storm sewer is within drainage and utility easement. The pligant shall verify the rn nhele s es/stormsewer loves it for: a GB 037 tight angle, eensider sterm seweF alignment b GB nnn tight gle larger s+r� �efi ire needed. C. GB 001 tight a gle larger s+rU M ire needed. d. GB 101 tight angle, � �larger s+refi ure needed. e. GB 011, tight a glelarger o+rU GtWe needed. fm GB 013 tight angle, Gensider sewer alignment g GB 008 tight a gle larger s+r� �efi ire needed. h. Additienal GB's r rea between GB 1 & 2 at the rear) bend Gatgh -basin s+ri infi irpcc havp heen re -verified Storm sewer systems and en+eh basin will he reviewed with the final design ihmit+al nrtJitinnal G-R's will her red +o Maintain the s+erm sewer eri+hin 'J fop+ from the r ;;d Noted. (n In 2020 05.08) Storm sewer shall have 15 feet of separation from a structure and include a 20' easement. The applicant should consider a utility and trail corridor between the private road and main road. (between Lots 10-11, Lots 11-12) Noted. (AJA 2020-05.08) This requirement is not met by the storm sewer that runs between Lot 7 and Lot 6. Confirm building footprint shown on plan. Applicant may need to reduce building footprint to meet requirement Our review is based on the assumption that the senior living complex has a finished floor elevation of 910.5 and a 12 foot parking garage below. The ground water in this area is an 897 to 899. They are not meeting the 4 foot of separation from groundwater. It is being proposing to mitigate this with a drain tile and pump system, backup power, and cut off wall. The City could consider reducing the low floor free board requirement of 4 feet separation from groundwater upon submittal of a geotechnical report and design by a licensed engineer. This report shall define ground water level elevations for the senior living complex and include plans demonstrating that potential ground water inflow will adequately be mitigated. The proposed trench grate and draintile will need to be pumped or discharged downstream of the pond. It is recommended to construct an improved outlet for the site, downstream of the pond. It is our understanding that this option would have construction impacts in an existing developed area. This underground dewatering system is being designed by Braun Intertec. Refer to information submitted by Braun. (AJA 2020-05.08) Wold to address The applicant shall show the proposed storm sewer for the turn lanes. We are concerned that there may not be enough grade between the turn lanes and the pond to ensure proper drainage. SEE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY GRADING DESIGN SUBMITTED BY SEH Preliminary grading design shows elevation conflict at MH 106. Final plans from SEH for the turn lanes will be reviewed and must align with Lyngblomsten plans Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 6 .I/S7:tl��IR1�fG1AlRSStGT.TSS�^.L7:�TRSriT!�LLiLfiZ7:T.i�iYir.. -., .Hill . ■- ■ �e�aai�nr.��a��rr.�er�rr.*rlrzs�nssr.*s�sr_�rr.�. . 13. Sheet C1.40 shnwc; thrpp d'ffPrPnt 01 lt'Ptr, di GhaFgmRg eff site. These outlets appear to be: 1 \ c+.,rrn sewer outlet from pond, 71 draintile for pond, Rd groundwater draintile system. The outlet must be limited to one pipe disGharge. DraiRtile Must toe We st0rFn sewer +let A IA 7/11/2020: THE ELEVATION OF THE DRAINITII E INVERT IS LOWER WER THAN THE OUTLET ET CI CVATIONI INICIDFE TYC OC_S NO DI ANI C_HANI(_CC MADE Ok. Note that if there are excessive erosion issues or other problems once constructed, the issue must be addressed with a new design. 17. SUB SLAB DRAINAGE SYSTEM a. Provide invert elevation for tie in locations at storm sewer manholes. AJA 7/11/2020: TIE-IN LOCATION ADDED. REFER TO SHEET C1.45. b. Provide invert elevation, slope, material, and size of pipe. REFER TO BRAUN SSD-1 SUB -SLAB DRAINAGE SYSTEM DRAWING c. Provide a construction detail for draintile installation. REFER TO BRAUN SSD-1 SUB -SLAB DRAINAGE SYSTEM DRAWING d. Include linework for this system on the storm sewer sheet so it can be compared with the other storm system management designs. This system is referred to as the groundwater building mitigation system underslab draintile system in the stormwater narrative. The details in b-d above are not yet available, but shall be provided to the City for review prior to construction. Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 7 a. Provide iRV8Ft elevatiORS, slope, material, and 6iZG Of Pipe. • .. - - An Sterm Sewerwith ether sterm system management design factors. 19. TANK AND TRENCH DRAINTILE SYSTEM: a. Provide updated calculation and details regarding this system from previous comments. b. Show invert elevations, slope, material, and size of pipe on utility plan c. Systems are not allowed to flow into the sanitary in the underground parking during any design event or situation. Install a valve to protect the sanitary sewer system in the parking garage. AJA 7/11/2020: TANK DESIGN HAS BEEN UPDATED/REFLECTED ON THE PLAN. WEIS 7/27/20: MECHANICAL PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED TO SHOW THIS DETAIL. All previous tank and trench drain City comments have been addressed. Note that there is a label conflict on sheet C1.46 for trench drain details. Details regarding the pump control panel and details on electrical configuration will be provided at a later time by Wold. 20. Applicant to update line style for storm pipe between MH 121 and FES 4 so that the arrows point the way the pipe is draining. 21. Anoka County will review the drainage for the turn lanes. City staff anticipates that they will need spread and run by calculations for the storm sewer per state aid standards. City staff strongly recommends that AJA staff work with Anoka County to determine storm sewer needs. • Water Supply The proposed site is currently not served by municipal water and on site wells shall be abandoned per MDH. This area of the City, Woodridge Estates, is currently a low pressure area. The City's Comprehensive Plan and water system model identifies the need for a 12-inch diameter trunk watermain to be looped through the Lyngblomsten development site to serve the fire flow needs for the site, and to improve flow within this area of Lino Lakes. The Lyngblomsten site will also have an 8- inch diameter watermain and service lines throughout the site. Comments: The applicant shall provide profile views of the proposed watermain in the construction plans. Noted, refile plans will beprovided in the final plat doG uments Staffyiill review watermain pre -files atermain layo t r nf; h;;..o hoon n.irlrec sod- and the profile views areupdated. General profile n .info inGl de: a. Ap;l'GaRt shall state popematerialin profile view label (i.e. Y" No I.AIATERMAIN __XC A IA 7 1V20-9fl• DIDC IIAATCCI AI IS CHQ_1A/NI IN' DI ANI AND PROFILE VIEWS AI CA DI CACC N OTC THAT THF_ DIDC MATCCIAI IS 1 ICTF_D ANI NOTE #2 Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 8 e. Applicant shall update the "12"x6" TEE" label on sheet 1.8113 to say "12"x8" TEE" f. Applicant shall use a 12"x8" tee instead of the 12"x8" cross near station 11+00 on sheet C1.82A. Update plan and profile labels accordingly. g. Applicant to confirm that watermain has the proper cover near station 1+30 on sheet C1.83. h. Applicant to add watermain profile labels on sheet C1.83 i. Applicant shall review watermain depth on sheet C1.86D between Stations 204+25 to approximately 204+80 j. Sheet C1.86E is no longer needed. Applicant to remove from plans. 2. Hydrant spacing shall be 200-feet (linear) max. The applicant shall provide detail or a figure of proposed hydrant spacing & coverage. Applicant to add a hydrant at the end of the east the cul-de-sac of the private road, preferably between Lot 1 and the proposed pedestrian ramp. r:r-Usririmm" rmr.�rnnr.�rr�nTrarse�mrsrrar..r..r���.�rssr . . .. .� .srwr:��:erraenrrarsr rar.� . _nrrari s�nrno�rse r. M,, ■- . ■ ■- , " "NI -. WO . ■ Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 9 I e e - . i . 1111 . - . .", I I'll I 1 .11 - -M!" - - .. .............. -., 10. Applicant shall specify material and size of casing pipe on plans for watermain crossings at Hodgson. Per Anoka County, HDPE watermain may be drilled without casing pipe if applicant finds HDPE watermain to be more cost effective for the crossings. THIS WILL BE SUBMITTED BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR. CASING MATERIAL AND SIZE IS DETERMINED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR PER THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. Noted. . :\ItS1:Sl...... .....Of -. • Sanitary Sewer The project site is currently not served by municipal sanitary sewer. The City of Lino Lakes is working on a trunk sanitary sewer project including a Lift Station and forcemain to serve approximately 60 acres. This service area includes the Lyngblomsten site and an unserviced area east of Hodgson Road. The Lyngblomsten project proposes serving the development with municipal sanitary sewer and services extended to each lot. Comments: 1. The applicant shall note the sewer connection location at the lift station will need to be adjust as the City finalizes the construction plans for this project. Noted. The invert at the lift station will need to be modified, it should be at 889.XX. This outlet invert has been labeled. (AJA 2020-05.08) City staff with provide current version of the lift station layout. Please update Lyngblomsten plans accordingly. AJA 7111/2020: LIFT STATION LAYOUT WAS NOT PROVIDED Lift station layout has been provided. Please include a hydrant near the lift station. The applicant shall provide profile views of the proposed sanitary sewer in the construction plans. Pro -files .sill be a pl'ohGd .yith fho final r• nofr Gtie plane and the profile .i ted General profile n nts ipnl, de: a Applinanf shall adjust everlappiRg popeand m nhple lahnlc A IA OVERLAPPING LABELS S REARRANGED TO NOT QC OVERLAPPING. Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 10 b Annl'r nt shall indicate that pope should he S;DR 26 fnr pipesr 20 f+ noon A IA 711112020! SDR 26 PIPE 1 ABE AI DED TO ALL SANITARY SEIA/CO BELOW 20 FT Dl=€IzREFER TOO SHEETS C1 8I n C1 83 PROFILES G. AppliGaRtshall rev't_-;.A.f that all plan view "mets Fnatdh the prefile view lomots en the Profile shoot See sheet G1 ozC ' example. t Pao � sheets. �� � a� a�� �na���p�. Prefile view includes MH 4, buy plan view noes nG+ A IA 711V2020! PLAN AND PROFILE VIEWS UPDATED TO MATCH d Annl'r nt shall reviewmaterial labels r. all profiles +e ensure that the' „Rtcp vmat •'RshAufn in the plaR view. See s#eetC1 82D as an example. The pipe between MH !A and nnu 1 B i shown as PVC in the plan view and RCP in the profile view. A IA 7 1112020: DIDC MATERIAL 1 AR—E S UPDATED-. e. Applicant shall update profile labels to say SDR 26 on sheet C1.83. f. MH 8 to be a drop manhole. Applicant shall update sheets C1.82B & C1.84 and add City Standard Detail SAN-4 in plans. 3. The utility crossings at Hodgson will require casing pipes and Manholes on each side of the roadway. Casing pipes below Hodgson have been provided on the utility plans. (AJA 2020-05.08) Applicant shall specify material and size of casing pipe on plans. Casing pipe for the 8" sanitary sewer shall be at least 20" in diameter. THIS WILL BE SUBMITTED BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR. CASING MATERIAL AND SIZE IS DETERMINED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR PER THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. Noted. 4. Applicant shall consider eliminating MH 6A and MH 4 by moving MH 5 into the center of lane. City would like to reduce the number of deep manholes. 5. Sanitary services over 70-ft long require cleanouts. Applicant to review cul-de-sac service lengths. • Transportation The existing site includes a single family home on the center large parcel and two commercial buildings on the south end of the project. There was also a restaurant on the corner of Hodgson Road and CR J that has been removed. The applicant is proposing to remove existing site accesses from county roads, and off Hodgson Road construct a full access on the north end of the site and a right in/out access at the midpoint of the site. They are also proposing a right in/out access off of CR J. A traffic analysis dated February 6, 2019, was prepared for project and review comments were submitted under a separate review memo from Chuck Rickart of WSB. Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 11 A IA 711112020: THE ROAD WIDTH HAS —BEEN SHOWN TO READ 32' Chuck Rickart of WSB will review turn lane plans once submitted. Anoka County to review turn lane design. Pedestrian crossing location still being identified by staff. Staff will review with next submittal. Review sidewalk detail callouts on Sheets C1.20 to C1.22. It appears that the labels for sidewalk against the curb and sidewalk with a boulevard were reversed. AJA 7/11/2020: THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SIDEWALK DETAIL IS SHOWN IN ALL AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN THE R/W. AJA'S SIDEWALK DETAIL IS SHOWN ON ALL SIDEWALKS THAT ARE PRIVATELY OWNED. Applicant to review AJA detail for sidewalk. It calls to install walk flush with top of curb, but not all walks are against the curb in the private areas. Some have boulevards between walk and back of curb. Final Plat Striping and Signage Plans shall include striping and signage for turn lanes. SEE ATTACHED PLAN FROM SEH. Anoka County to review signing and striping plans. Details 1011, and 17 on G2 13 can he used forsigns On the private portions of the site Signs within pu blip right of .. shall moot n ent MnDQT s sifisations A IA 7111 2020• NOTED Applicant shall show the location of proposed street lights on the roadway construction plans. WEIS: ELECTRICAL PLANS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO SHOW THIS DETAIL. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There is one wetland located on the site. It was delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental on 06/11/18. The Technical Evaluation Panel approved the wetland delineation on 10/3/18. Comments: 1. The appl}eant shall replace detail GEN 22 with the r t The deta'I has been updated. This r6elmllmlelnt still needs to be addressed Gen 77 I ast r ed i lanuar. of 2019 is sheyin as detail 15 ein chant (`7 13 (AAA. 2n0n5 n8) • Landscaping The comments below address engineering related items associated with the landscaping plan. The City's Environmental Coordinator will be submitting a landscape plan review. Comments: 1 . The Gity's ordinanGe requires a 30 foot Glear zone at interseGtiens. in addition the appliGant shall provide a clear (no vegetation or otheF) triangular sight line of 100 feet at with County roadways. 30' sight IOR86 will be provided fer City read iRtGF68GtiGR6. light triaRgleG at G06IRty FE)adS This will he r .ed when t' irn lanes plans are fipalized Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 12 Landscaping being reviewed by City of Lino Lakes Environmental Coordinator. COLBERG TEWS: We did not receive any review or comments from the Environmental Coordinator Staff recommends that no trees are planted on top of storm sewer pipes or other utilities. COLBERG TEWS: Tree locations have been reviewed for conflicts with storm and other utility lines and resolved. Applicant shall review the tree locations as some conflict with the sanitary and water services to the townhomes. It also appears that the boulevard trees near proposed lift station will conflict with the sanitary sewer stubs and the watermain stubs. Review the tree layout near Dry Basin 4P by FES 7 and FES 8. Applicant shall update landscape plan near lift station to provide proper screening. • Geotechnical A geotechnical report was completed by Braun Intertec for the proposed Lyngblomsten development. See PDF named "3.27.20 Letter to Diane Hankee" for additional geotechnical evaluation. • Floodplain Floodplain is not present on this site. • Drainage and Utility Easements Comments: 1. The private readwseuth anness shall h;;vp r1raiRage & utility easemeRt ever readway for the publiG utilities. This i.vidth shaall be A- Fninirnurn ef 2-0- feet A.nd GeRtered n the r ordh +ili+iec Plans have been updated a errdingly The plan set shall show the storm sewer plan view and easement lines on the same page. This will allow the City to verify all storm and utility easements are correct. See sheet C1.41, Utility Easement Plan. • Development Agreement A development agreement is required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Not applicable at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 08/05/2020 Page 13 A stormwater maintenance declaration will be required with the final plat. • Permits Required City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for grading NPDES General Construction Permit MDH Watermain Extension Permit MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit - Received RCWD Permit - CAPROC received Anoka County and Ramsey County Access and Right of Way Permits If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at (612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com. Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review Environmental Memo To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: June 3, 2020 Re: Environmental Coordinator Comments Environmental has the following comments about the Lyngblomsten Preliminary plat dated May 11, 2020: • Irrigation design should consider a valve to shut off native prairie areas if water gets low in the pond. • A maintenance agreement will be required for the pond. • Prairie area plantings should be a lower profile seed mix with enhanced forbs added. Seed mix descriptions needed. See new comments below. • Applicant must have an NPDES permit. Not listed yet • Applicant must have a designated inspector for erosion control who is certified in erosion control from the State of Minnesota. • All erosion control inspections and corrections for non-compliance issues must be sent to the City of Lino Lakes no later than the next business day. New Comments, Andy Nelson 5/07/20 • Consider replacing Little Moses burning bush (Euonymus alatus) with another species. This species is specially regulated now and will be on the Department of Agriculture restricted list in 2023. 0 Page 1 • Describe or provide specs for seed mixes used. On the landscape and planting plans seed mixes are called seed mix A or seed mix B, but an explanation of these mixes could not be found. • Page 2 Wol WHAT WE HEARD: LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING MEETING TOWNHOMES NEED ONE MORE COLOR SCHEME • EXTERIOR OF THE MAIN BUILDINGS COLOR AND PATTERNS NEED MORE VARIATION COLORS SHOULD BE LIGHTER, BUT ARCTIC WHITE IS A CONCERN Wol Residence Material Scheme A While Mission Brown lDoors Winr Asphalt Shingles A A B C B C B B A B C A A C C i Accent Siding ` — Cobble Stone LP Smartside Primary Siding Trim Evening Blue LP Smartside Arctic white LP Smartside l ) Chardonnay Tuscan Ledgestone Residence Material Scheme B LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES TOWNHOMES Residence Material Scheme C White Mission Brown White Windows/Doors Asphalt Shin les Windows/Doors A A B C B C A A B C A B A B C A C C Accent Siding -- Cobble Stone LP Smartside Primary Siding Mountain Sage Trim LP Smartside Arctic White LP Smartside I:r Chardonnay Tuscan Lodgostone Mission Brown Accent Siding Cobble Stone LP Smartside Gray Slate LP Smartside Trim Arctic White LP Smartside 1 Chardonnay Tuscan Lcdgcstone Wol IE� 1 III III III�III -17 �dr Wol LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES PRIMARY BUILDING MATERIAL BOARD Dark Bronze Black Aluminum T-Tone Metal Window Frame Storefront Paravel Cao Evening Blue Arctic White - Board and Batten Hardie Siding Hardieplank Siding ipe Fteron Siding w � Ohia Blue Vein Cut Slane ■ LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES EXTERIOR VIEWS - MAY PROPOSAL Original October 2018 t ffl� n Wol fir Original October 2018 ■ ■ I� LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES EXTERIOR VIEWS - JULY PROPOSAL Wol ■R N� III sa es EE iiii "` Yty °s III :I NJ �G r■ p mi xi 'R is ii Y• oil !!1 .. 1MOW ilia IN oil mom Hi t f 111I Ilk F1 I n 7 � r I N 11 J1 ICI I 11kjjjVWI �IIII„I r f 1 AN y' 11I� I ' r.11 Wol LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES HODGSON ELEVATION Wol LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES Building Height and Stone Percentage Change Building Heights May 2020 Current Change Top of Wall + Parapet = Total Top of Wall + Parapet = Total 2 Story Skilled Care 25-3" + 2'-11" = 28'-2" 25'-3" + 2'-11" = 28'-2" 0 3 Story Assisted Living 35-10" + 1'-5" = 37'-3" 35-10" + 2'-4" = 38'-2" +0'-11" 4 Story Independent Living 46'-6" + 2'-6" = 49'-0" 46'-6" + 4'-0" = 50'-6" +1'-6" Main Entrance 46'-6" + 2'-6" = 49'-0" 50'-6" + 1'-8" = 52'-2" +3'-2" Stone Percentage (Min 33%) 38.6% (exceeds min) 36.2% (exceeds min) -2.4 Stone Percentage 2018 May 2020 Current Stone Percentage (Min 33%) 26% 38% 36% Wol 3 JY- Wol t .�_�t ;ulff, .� Wol :. - t. f.._ •.-ice _ fi w r� DIP ..: •.a • r . 1 Wol • L 1 y N 1 � re man Y * •ram _ - �' ��` , d Y!� I � � I N fl Sri � '_ � _ � ' r -i _s �irV ■M y ■■ _� of '' �� N ��lll�il I j INr , rr B IM, + ii II oil.M s i 7tir� eollk'i'l E.ili- r N �. y i I r. I I A I I I Shed)I I I I I F l I I �� /_\ \ I \/ I I / v I W''ly Ext. of N Line of I r I I I I \ .� 9 O Lot 4, A . NO. 107 � ` I FENCE COR. FALLS 0.1 % SOUTH �\ \ 90% PROP. LINE -\\ I I / L gL J / 9 \\ I I FENCE 2 OR• NORTH -� o �� I I /� I I /- FENCE FALLS I N0°06'25"W , / \ \ - NO°06'25"W S Lihe of ROfVAVIC OAKS I I o I 'w_d CAP#12251 �� �C�P#9 8 0� CAP#9808 y /� -1734 N89 5335 E 1014.46 o.li NORTH - - - - - - - - - - I � - - \ / •-4.30.2�3 � ><~•>i ��^. ,^ _ I ,� _ 520.65 - �� `- 36.58 -' , 27 0Q . 0�� \� - N89°5 '35"E 520.65 I I FENCE COT. FA LS 13 n i \y`^\>,^\% o\�,�,5 / 0.5'/- SOUTH \ �, \ y aacD\ 0, 64.95 57.00 57.00 56.90 57.00 57.00 56.90 56.90 57.00 BS Bit �BLSfz3 BSBL/ - SBL/ BSB BSBL BSBL BSB BSBL BSBL BSBL BSBL BSBL BSBL I I 3 J x / wl - N Lie of Lot 4, Ali Sly N0. 107',' \v;<,�; , .ox.Y � ` q1"� z 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 W \ L-rie of SW 114 of the \, 8 r� / ` , ° \\ ` <\x\: ' y< ag9• s °,o, `\ � � y ,5SE 114 of S. 31T3l R. 22 >r3 g1- ^ 29 oIN` O 0 0 N°c�oo oO X -, �gr'< 10 57.00 57.00 56.90 57.00 57.00 ° 56.90 56.90 57.00 � / ; = Wetland Bufferk' Area:�l S89 053'35 'W 455.70 ° o 54.0 I cc O- --- --\ /908- y"; > \l, C I I\' �x\ o0i J J / �C. o ° o I I I -C \\~X'\, * ,tl --- I I -` O CW z i \� `> - - ��\ ,' N89 °53'35"E 114.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ - 9 °53'35"E 172.00 \ `n I I _ ;_ I °_' \ / \I 57. 00 57. 00 NT 53 35 E 57. 00 � 57. 00 58.00 \ I c 1� � '\c Y\ NI e ;,,1 / 57.6/ o _ 0� Pr osed Trail - '� > k /< > / / 3 I I I >` \X �"I"-, \ �. �\ > \` / �� cV O / V • 1R / 1222 SF 4c R O �� \ A I O I I � �• \\^' T,' y k \ \ �� \1\ / °6�j� cS��?' �r.j NOO Nip N� /V N� `O / /NOO 20 NO O�n \ r . , \ , \ , 6'.. I� EX%S tL ` CO a IQ :k�0 �JO / Z o0 o O Bar. ^ O 15 �`° \ /� \� / \ �, 2300 E / / \ \ 3 / I 4. co I S89 °53'35 "W S89 °5335 "W Sl7%°42'53"E \ 9o�p W ` - , %� j `� oo / 57.00 57.00 l 57.00 57. DO 58.00 / -22. l2 \ o o o Drainage &Utility o a i >�oL�. \ ,� / S89°53'35"W 172.00 `y �� n \ O 3 I 900 900 900 Easement Over °, i 0\ 0 °O E \ h0 \ \ I b -�c 6i11 of Lot 22 Go R6 y96 �6p 9 N �� O�// 2°48 j0 k �� \ l --- / q O `90 S89°25'49"W I I a I CO\O�/ 6 D,5 00 / /i / I i 7 I )„ N7 0 2„ N 1 9 i °. / I 7.1 fl\ 18.00--, w e I 1 3 , I9� a I 6 9 0955„8, / ° yo, OO o F N I� - 1 x ` o j`'"' / cn 1 �' \ %.j00 \ �Ir\ 1 W rn; / \ 1.�2 ,� R� \ J \ ,OH •/" I o w o 9�6• g05' / \ 7 °° \90 / / O� a 5 a/n3.2 O o, r C- I U \ I \ \ /g43.51 ` / c a " N 6 - / 9 \ 1.4 0 2.2 / R=/38.49 90 v o, y6770/ o /' \\ \ \ O 9- '1'S6 , / \ o r " �69 / R�110.� \ 12.I n -- 3f 2% / I' \ b \ \ 9 0 moo, "� , 1 S7 /8'2 E „ \ SE H o / 9• --12.30 u_ \ SEPTIC MH ' �22\� .49 T\ I /�/20 iI' ,J N88 °2339 "E & - \ - - - 51.78 P#12251 ` II . I.'i 1�5 \ I 0/1I \ 9Ro 'a 6�s srsr„ h` 1\ S67°0231 "E O / 4 ILIO I � I I 90 0 i / _ / / \\_ \ 1 / r I _ N -� z / _ �905 I- I I I �I / S88°23'39"WX� X-x 1 11 Ii w 57.00 I I 60 -904 \ 60�1,11 OUTLOT /A o I -N- / / '% oy I vv I I / / d / /\ I I I I IACV / � 0 50 100 A - - = x. \\� - NE'ly Line of Lot 22 \ I NNE �' ^/ / / N \ SW'ly Line of Lot 4 �� h / I I I I I SCALE IN FEET ���\ -Z� / Lila \ s6,. I I W I I THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 2, ROHAVIC / / `\ `- ' \\ - - - - 90j Drainage & Utility OAKS IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF osement Over ^� l - - ^ l I NORTH 89°53'35" EAST �\ \ / / _ s� 1 / \ \ � of Outlot A \ \ � �° I I I \ I INV= ( L-- O DENOTES I/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT 10 892.59 SET, MARKED "LS 17255" DENOTES NAIL SET /�� 9 0 ' 2 ` �90 \ / �\,o /\\ 0 .J • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND / / ?,. C• 2, � ��� � �� � �11k DENOTES REBAR IRON FOUND / / o• or,•o w \ _ I �? J h-- ® DENOTES NAIL FOUND CIOI 3 -g04� I I DENOTES CAST IRON FOUND �'No �\ \ a N905- 6 I wI \ ° M120 3'/-� 05 I X /ICI I ► I SURVEY LEGEND / / - ► I I I X/ I Q w D ELEV @THRESHOLD CATCH BASIN » STORM SEWER ' / / \\ \ / / --- ` /66 / \ \ \ / I I� I I I THSI I W �® \\\ I c I I I I x� 2 CO SAN CLEANOUT STORM MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER I °25 I I 1 I I I o X O \ COL BUILDING COLUMN SANITARY MANHOLE I WATERMAIN \ \ X9 O HAND HOLE HYDRANT CULVERT / / / \ 9cn ----�- / I �O - o \ l � Drai oge &I Utility Easement - I I UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC RD o ROOF DRAIN D4 GATE VALVE ELE l� 0 MAILBOX 0 POWER POLE FO UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC \ I I \ \ I \ / / I `� �O XPCs / to POLE GAS UNDERGROUND GAS I \\- - - - - - - - - XI Oo A�gV) o GUARD POST cn L - --------�--------- I I rgo° I / T \ I I I I ° GUYWIRE TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE +1 I 0 WELL � / -� SIGN OH L x \l f \ \ = OVERHEAD UTI ITY o N \\ I �\ \ rn g x972.5 SPOT ELEVATION -X X-BARBED WIRE FENCE \ II \ N89°2549"E 39/.l8 I ti I I 41 ❑A A/C UNIT -0-0- CHAIN LINK FENCE \\ II I \ ------------ r----------- ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -N-N-SPLIT RAIL FENCE \ - �A I \ 1 I I I I I oU^ $ m OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE -� �- WOOD FENCE _ _`_ - - \\� 90 1 � I 90s\ J \� -- Drainage & Utility Easement Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL - - v I OE ELECTRIC METER CONCRETE CURB \ \\ 6 2 X W I \\\ s I ICI I \I I © GAS METER - - WL- EDGE OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS \ I I -33 -3 BSBL BUILDING SETBACK LINE Existing a House / ►I L=20.98 l\ l \ I I I a CONCRETE c 2 '2 ,� --� p � �4 2709 -- \___---- ► Ion \ g03� \ IN I I w c g�2 CONTOUR \ o �� �� \ \ \ o / / \ Sly Line of Lot 4 & / cS894047E\\ \ NIA„- NLine Lot 5-\ 1/2''OP '- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x - �-� - - - -- 56.71 w o N89040'47"W 356.64-- - - o �3 I PI CHED HOP rn a o "� Shed" Z /32.1 'A I I \ \ S89 40 47 E- _ �\ I 20.3 N N'Gara e I -----W'ly Ext. of S Line of '04- - 250 SF N 713 9 N I I -33-4 w _ Lot 4, Aud. Sub. No. 107 2.1 ` II ON NO \ cy I II J OR. FENCE N� N � ^ O \ v\ = 38.2 C FALLS a N O a s ' S o o, w I c; 0.4N 0.5E- Ni I \ ZN� ^b I Off) ^�\`- �� \ G �w cc'o o,y It Aj S89°44'38"E - / v \ /It g4 47.8 I CAP s 7 1 ` I \ - - 12 - - _ 80.95 _ _ \ \ o k6 ci /34.s W roo �o•y \ �� I 37.2 I I � I O a O I l Story �i w a ' h e d \ ch \I 1 ' M Stucco Building I I O Oui L2675SIF ICCOTTAGE HOME RMH90.25 1 - INV=892.9� o \ CAP#3527 DETAIL , I -� _�_ \�'\ o e -�--- ' :I) M \ I I o J N Line Lot 6 -� I I O J Droinagetility Easement Oder rIJ � 3 All of\0CJ7�bT B 0 o I a 33 33 W 7'-,N3 � \ -O I -- ' \ \\ \ I� 4 I / / I I � p LU 11 : 11 se 2 I,3N ��� ❑�\ , ��/ \ O I / T' I r I I �w op ; \ V _ co 5.8 , - /t / I W \ E d �i 33.I O �' I I I ti °o �' Q. I t N Line of Anoka I 3 Proposed Trail - I I , o -- \ , I T h - T - <----------- �t -- °4�' YI m ° Z _ 1 ICo. Highway ROW o i In ASH STREET a I I I I S89 58 OS W I _ /0 0 1 ' 72.95 i l60 - \ I Xo N89 044'38"W 353.60 I Plot No. 48 89 °44'38 "W '08 "W IN c 3 < _L16 _ ° 2.7i �r - _-sM+- 53 0 0 29.18 �I EXCEPTION' -I N89 4 38 W 527.77 � --' r ` � s�cz,T1 -- -- = S89°44'38"E 113.35 �0 EXCEPTION _0v --- L- RQW �� cn - I� o l I YY�� MH sTM N; I / N-� I I S Line Lot 6� .,L=17. 4-- I I I /`n RIf901.22 RIM=900.96 90) I. ]p� I SMH I/ I h °, I, i I . / n / / I r, 11 , r, I r, CNN=89�.22 CB c0� GA¢ / GAS / �� 1., 1 RIM-9 2.74 I k / O I 11 1 a I I \ 1\ 1 I I-' I i RIN-900.20 r r� "O INV=B 03 ° O u • I Ii o "I-�� o 11 •� GAS / I - u + R=1465. 9 I ° N89 5808 E S89 °44 38 E 1 • 36.85 / 1354.58 • i� S89 4 3� STMH N89 44 38 W 113.35 I - cns P , \ - - - 695, 68 74 I n S \ I r , tRhV_ , (Min. Setback Distance) \` --RIM_=_9O RIM=900.75 I C- r, r r r, r, r o 1 I I r� I I v� r r f r ri�rti ry 11 gF�O , \ „ A I I r, I I -S 114 � INV=897.06(N) I J I I t I G G i 11 ., �i �^ 11 t V �� �� l� r \�� g\ "� / I I i t �-] , 1\ 1 (NOT TO SCALE) S 3/, T. 3l, R. 22 wv=Sssss(E) I (Nubllcly traveled RoadW 906 I I i I 1 SE 114 Corner of S. 3/, T. 3/, R. 22 - ti 1S Lin of Lot 22 per AUD. SUB. NO. 107 i _ r, 0 ' $ i N Line ROW per AtV. SUB. NO. 10 / NE 114 Kner of � C/M 3rd Correction Monument Lirr�of SE�4 oT.3l; R�2 Purposedly Taken as ROW per Prescriptim Right / S. 2, T. 30, R. 23 - (3.38 N LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5. AND All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 21, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. AND All that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line of said Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 22, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. AND That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. Excepting therefrom Parcel 20, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. AND Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; and That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. AND That part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 described as follows: The South 237 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31 North, Range 22 West lying Westerly of the St. Paul Waterworks right-of-way, excepting the West 696.33 feet. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: OWNER/DEVELOPER: Loucks Lyngblomsten 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 1415 Almond Ave. Maple Grove, MN 55330 St. Paul, MN 55108 763-424-5505 651-632-5387 1. Prepared May 11, 2020. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 6075 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN. 3. The bearings for this survey are based on the Anoka County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1996 Adjust). 4. Benchmark: MNDOT monument 0280G located at the southeast quadrant of Sunset Avenue over 35W. Elevation = 929.28 (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located at the southeast quadrant of Ash Street and Albans Street. Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29) 5. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27003CO344E, Community Panel No. 2700150344E effective date of December 16, 2015. ei. The field work was completed on October 10 2019. 7. Buildings on adjacent property are taken from aerial photographs and maps provided by others. ZONING INFORMATION Current Zoning: Zone (GB) General Business District Proposed Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development SITE DATA PROPOSED AREAS Block 1 Lot 1 = 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 2 = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 3 = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 4 = 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 5 = 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot ei = 4,154 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 7 = 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 8 = 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 9 = 4,802 Sq. Ft. or 0.11 Acres Lot 10= 4,q. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 11= 4,1 ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 12= 4,112 Sq. Ft. or 0.09 Acres Lot 13= 4,141 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 14= 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 15= 4,307 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 16= 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 17= 4,1ei1 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 18 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 19 = 4,161 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 20 = 4,234 Sq. Ft. or 0.10 Acres Lot 21 = 1 a4,214 Sq. Ft. or 4.4g Acres Block 2 Lot 1= 181,122 Sq. Ft. or 4.16 Acres Lot 2= 53,044 Sq. Ft. or 1.22 Acres Lot 3= 30,800 Sq. Ft. or 0.71 Acres Outlot A 102,547 Sq. Ft. or 2.35 Acres Outlot B 16,977 Sq. Ft. or 0.39 Acres Outlot C 93,809 Sq. Ft. or 2.15 Acres Gross Plat Area= 915,795 Sq. Ft. or 21.02 Acres Proposed ROW= 79,841 Sq. Ft. or 1.83 Acres Wetland and Wetland Buffer= 22,750 Sq. Ft. or 0.52 Acres Net Plat Area= 813,204 Sq. Ft. or 18.67 Acres DENSITY (Acres) Gross Area 21.02 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.28 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW (CSAH) 1.83 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer) 0.24 Net Area 18.67 # of Units 167 Gross Density 7.94 Net Density 8.94 # of Units (Future) 223 Gross Density (Future) 10.e,1 Net Density (Future) 11.94 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) II -5 II 5 - -1 - 10 I I +I II ---1--J L - ---- BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. OEM LnUCKS PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. 10/03/18 SURVEY ISSUED 10/17/18 REVISED SURVEY 10/19/18 REVISED PER COMMENTS 01/09/1Id ADDED ADJ. EASEMENT 01/10/1Id UPDATED SURVEY 01/12/19 UPDATED SURVEY 01/29/19 REVISED PER COMMENTS 04/15/20 REVISED PER COMMENTS 04/24/20 UPDATED SURVEY 05/08/20 REVISED PER COMMENTS 05/11/20 REVISED PER COMMENTS I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. enry D. Nelson - LS License o. 17255 Date 10/03/18 Loucks Project No. 18268A Project Lead HDN Drawn By SFH Checked By HDN Field Crew SFH, MJA I Trailer ' 49 Court CHERRY LN. ICIR. OPj3%IN APPLE LN. I PLUM LN,I \ _ Q I LINDA N LINDA AVE. LINDA WHITE PINE RD. CT• z a PINE RD. SC HL4 E Iw o °W LN J CT RAVEI a WOODRIDGE D o I a c o o o l? ROHAVIC LN. I Y SITE I T31N R22 31132 o c�° 49 I I \ I T30N R23 ASH T. _ ] COUNTY RD. J W. F1 (49) LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to wit: M041DI AND AND AND AND AND All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5. All that part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot 6, said Subdivision, which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with said South line of said Lot 6, 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and lying Northerly of a line drawn parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 and 72 feet Southerly thereof, as measured along the Easterly line of said Lot 5, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6, 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at a right angle to said South line 289.31 feet to the North line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 21, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. All that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot 6 which is 54.50 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence North at right angles with the South line of said Lot 6 to the North line thereof and there terminating. Excepting therefrom Parcel 22, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 5, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. Excepting therefrom Parcel 20, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 48. Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota; and That part of Lot 22, Auditor's Subdivision No.107, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4, said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. That part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 described as follows: The South 237 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31 North, Range 22 West lying Westerly of the St. Paul Waterworks right-of-way, excepting the West 696.33 feet. Anoka County, Minnesota Abstract Property Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LYNGBL-OMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION, and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way, and does also dedicate the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC SIGNED: as STATE -OF COUNTY -OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by , as Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, My Commission Expires of Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, a Notary Printed Name SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, Henry D. Nelson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this Plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of Henry D. Nelson, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 17255 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY -OF HENNEPIN 20 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Nelson, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires January 31, 2020 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 20 , by Henry D. This plat of LYNGBL-OMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota By , Mayor By COUNTY SURVEYOR Clerk I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Charles F. Gitzen, Anoka County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. a, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of , 20 0 Property Tax Administrator COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA 91 Deputy I hereby certify that this plat of LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of , 20 , at o'clock M. and was duly recorded as Document Number 0 County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By , Deputy .. LOUCKS SHEET 1 DF 2 SHEETS LYNGBLOMSTEN AT LINO LAKES ADDITION City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 ,- E Line of Lot 4 & W Line of Hodgson Rd. per S'ly Extension of E Line of J o N I ROHAVIC OAKS and Monumentation N v V - T E Line of SW 1/4 of the , r - , , A ri I /\ F1\A/\/ /♦AI r+� �� 'h ♦i WIC SE 1/4 S 3/, L 3/, R. 22-� I -\ I vv Y E Line of Anoka Co. SO°0/'52'E Highway ROW Plat No. 48 _ 3300 i SO°34'1l "E 1288.54 \ ---- a 108 w / o I� `-E Line of Lot 4 per S89°5836.'76-- , � -� 'S N HODGSON ROAD N i AUD. SUB. NO, 107 �, _ _ I HODGSON ' ROA D N89 °4438 "W �I 18 _ _ _ 1 SO°34'll"E 269.5/ S89°25 L=148.29 d=s°l3'28"-/3s5.0o 1 - - - - - S0 °34'l l "E 297.90 78./2 S5°39'/8"W I I I L=24.19 I o o i i� / o �� a i N _ -� I -,� 463.67 1 d=0 55 /4 NO 0625 W � SO 0625E , n o o, I - F- - �45.74 _ _ - I ° l7-L=l ° 04 17.34- 73.00 R=1505.5/ I 11 I �0 39 58 25 25 1 I I 1 239.8/ - I R-14165.69 z N Lr)I 1 0 J 1 /o O ` 1 1 J I 1 8 /0 N N i NO°O6'25"W <\ I 1 c z 1 1 I o 0 0 0 - IN i 73.00 I Sl7°42'S3"E °a 1, , � - `. j I .o Un I 1^O _ 2 22.12 6 / I I a I I o , „ / DETAIL As- 1 _ I I 1 wl �III SO 0625E � I ,,\ s° \ � \ -- 1 -- i I I 3x NO°06'25"W 73.00 I ' �, / (Not to Scale) �� �6 ,-\ \\ I i I < awl 33 0 73.00 0 00 o SO°0/'l6"W SO°0/'l6"WCr jl 3 h 20 u° i / 6.4/ 6.76 �/ �S�It, � i 13.35 �, `�1 I 1� -----1-----------"' 2� o o NO°O6'25"W 1 I 05 'j I o , „ j \ v o\ 3 ° , o 41" fig. 3 so o/ is w r�s I _ \ - - _ SEE DETAIL A 1 "' n I ;I; Z .Q NO 06 25 W cV 73.00 I v v L 1 `` 7300 ; o 0 0 ���� << \% I t o �0 I .. 0 g'S3�1� i'' i, m �// N o 0 0 Lo 9 r sus �,� �� I `, �, i \ I N I 10� `� I AIL/���q�I _�C h ^Lr) 4 '� R 11 , O °j 00 , I :11ap 0 2 CY_ 7' 3 , ,, Q Q 0<3 Q NO °06'25 "W - \ d` o , " o 0 o NO °06'25'W 73.00 \� o Q / p� \ SO 0/ l6 W s� 1 I I < '1 z� o �,__- 3 2 o73 00h o ^ O rn � No I ��D �� S_cS° 6� /� I / I I r \ \� 1 / LdJ Ln LA oLo C51 S? u) NO °06'25"W , �, \ �� I I I o o I // w W_ 73.00 No o \ - I I I I z I ` NO °06'25 "W i hLO ?6'y� �o \ O`t' \ ` 73.00 i ^ 6�o S F �j o \ \ ��� \ / \n6, I I I o dot 225 I 0{ ots / (%� 00 I I rn I rn / \ .<C/ i r, 3t W v t 1ne o{ 1 / ,r ^ N 0 1 I 1 S�\/ / P {g�{ 0 9�5�1 Io 3 o I o I i ;� SO°06'25"E 6 /30 50 I I `� 1 /0 I i/ / `- 00 NO 0625 W I' !�� ¢2 rn 11 L=30- 6 I t=87./4 o ' 73.00 I 73.00 3 a.� iS o� - _ I / _ 0 00 00 oo �o%> o % /S° \ \ 1� 25 25 I _ 4=5°I8 23 d-l5 07'45" / / 11 M `I- o ♦ L - ° / 1 /0 a- Q 7 /7 I\ 2S�„ 0 2S0?E I 110.07 L=117.70 _ d=// 2950 < `� % o ��� 2?40j 936p _ 56 d=20°26'08" J 3655E L=54.18 I / / 11 _s_ I Q\ 1� _ _ _ 59. l. 44 1� R=330.00 54. q yD ---- N8 226. `- � „ � NO °06'25 "W moo° � - -� 56.81 °49' 13 W / / III - I 50 I / I NO °0T04 "E 69.29 11 N NO 06 25 W 1 '� 3 i / / / �1, L=96.30�„ `, GA IEWA Y I < \I�,� ,h 73.00 �, 6, S/S?S' L=114.22 II / / I d=20r26 08 \ i / I DR/VE o 1 3 0 J o d, 0 2 /y -24 /4 /6 R= 70.00 , S// ° 0 73.00 0 o 00 0 0. 0 o d , // , I 3' L=66.22 I n o� oo Q o vZ I� �% "' I� ``� ??¢0� �o R=270.00 / 655'�i d-//° j 1 cn o DO I� Q I� I �, "� �+ o� "� / \ L=75� j2 5 . I - 29 50 0 , „ Z h o m ,( / �\ - - ° I A'=330.00 I SO 07 04 W 1 0 rr / - NO 06 25 W I 44 / 20.98 d-l5 5 �77 °¢g'13"E 226. �, " _. / / W 8�58 69.l5 o 0 0o r 73.00 SS / d=4 2709 - 4�/ ^ I rn rn v I 26.4/ � �� 6�io`�� S7°l8'27"E 9.60 d=24°l4'ls" R=330.00 I / / I ,tl� o 'FjOUTLOT l0 /0 Z NO°06'25"W v I I (1 SO006'1 It o6 `s <�-12.30 / / oar °�'d �91�9 9\ -, Trail Easement z I j 42632 -- / 2/ 1 9 y 73.00 co ti6 „ % % N 9 lu Oraina e & Utility oI 1� �O °* 34.75 / s??° OUTLOT • A / / \ 0{ 1 / a0 Easement Over rn Q c» I `7 5R 5 'S �� Ste' S67°023/ "E / e 00 h °d ^ ` N V ` ��z � ��p0� ,� �S�o S�SB /_�`�?s9 �%--9.69 Drainage & Utility / / \ �,{� \ 1�ot 22 o� A// of OUTLOT B 1 I o o Easement Over / 0 ap _ ' �; / N5°13'51 "W 09 \ �o �k `�`� sS9��, S , / _------------------------237 �I- 7------ o \ \ _ 74.80 \n \ �,,,- ti 0 0 Si ao I 177.02 /o o i {0• so ° 0 O p All of Out/ot A / l001 o " \ „ cfl� \ .990� F` ��� 1^] 'S� o B) --\ / / � � � �_ o r u 50.00 NO 06 25 W �ti E �� o, \ �9 /4 ,� ? / 1 �, NO 34 06 W /87.02 I - - - 17.34- x l `sue\ OO t 0 00`L`L ti� S6 `sib , N v / / >" lO. DO-� I SO °l5 22 "W v /O � \ \ \ �F �� ti� �0 1 �hti 1�. /3 \� Nam° o `o / / 565 - �� Ir 1b p / `��q, , `� ���� �- c c / 5� �' SE N Line of Lot 3, i �v W Line of SW 1/4 of the r I / (ko"/ AUD. SUB. N0. 107 - 00 5 / N42°l0'l0'E o F 0�0 �� 0�� 6� ����O%K- \\\ / r \ \ SE l/4 S. 3/, T. 3/, R. 22 - SI 036'21 "E 65.53 - 1 _ ./ \ U\U �� raj ^ NOO / E 5O Sig' i - 2 21 \� �' N / / o{ the ' \ 1° Drainage &Utility o N�o Z NI 036'21 "W / / \-' vot 22'& �E\S�P\ES Easement Over "� 7247 / 5 \O1 4 \ All of Lot 21 I I Otis \ / / \1rt1�.2 �O�OOpR\0 o {g / 0{ S71 °02'23 "E �� 90 9'' 0 1040 � o I 5700 W \\ v41. 44 �I DETAIL B (Not to Scale) \ I I \ I I i L=96.30 d=20026'08" R=270.00 \ 11 d=4 27 09 d=15058'58" v ' L=20.98 L=75.32 I \ Lrj I I Nv 3� o� 0 45 P►, °� 2�•Zg O� W � �� ��^ o� 0 � W1y Ext. of S Line of �21°�19{ \Lot 4, Aud. Sub. No. 107 -� 9 ' / ZZ / 0{ dot Q �o / =' N/0°50�5t _ / / �� \ <I I II' .IIII - - Q ~ Trail Easemen t - I 5700 / 2M • I II 0\ < (INFO) DENOTES INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON 0 60 CITY PLANS. NOT FIELD VERIFIED. z � / / N_ N60 °l6'03'E J DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS 1-24.08 \ �� / ARE SHOWN THUS: I �` SCALE IN FEET A ° I I BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF �- 5 • 00 / / THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, I I , ,� K { C / TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 HAVING A BEARING 5 zuzzu / / 2gg69 OF N89P44'38"W 10 < / O DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON U MONUMENT SET, MARKED "LS 17255" I 1 1 I r\ o 2361\---�--J L - - - - - - - r I Q / Q DENOTES "PK NAIL" SET ' C v, r'- SITE o \ • DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT ' Found Anoka County o I FOUND, CAPPED "LS 12251 ", UNLESS BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE Cast loon Monument- J z I OTHERWISE SHOWN INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND - - - • - • Zt BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE Q. I ` O DENOTES FOUND COUNTY INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22, o CAST IRON MONUMENT LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA �,"K ■■ LnuCKS I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 iI7 MN A B I! 0 E F G H NOTES: 1. REFER RO SHEET C1.11, REMOVALS PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES. 2. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. LEGEND CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALS GRAVEL REMOVALS BUILDING STRUCTURE REMOVALS FENCING REMOVALS ��o o UTILITY REMOVALS X X X RETAINING WALL REMOVALS MASS TREE / SHRUB REMOVALS -- — — —— SAWCUT 8 REMOVALS KEY NOTE PROPERTY LINE KEY NOTE LEGEND R1 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO NEAREST JOINT R2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / VALLEY GUTTER R3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT R4 REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE R5 REMOVE FENCING (INCLUDING FOOTINGS AND GATES) R6 SALVAGE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN. PROVIDE NEW POST. REFER TO SITE PLANS, SHEETS C1.20 - C1.22 FOR RELOCATION. R7 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER Rg REMOVE SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE Rg REMOVE WATERMAIN 10 REMOVE MASS TREE/SHRUB/LANDSCAPING R11 SAWCUT REMOVE RETAINING WALL 13 REMOVE WET WELL 14 REMOVE SEPTIC TANKS AND RELATED SANITARY 15 REMOVE BUILDING AND RELATED (FOOTINGS, STOOPS ETC) 16 REMOVE PAVERS P1 PROTECT CONCRETE PAVEMENT P2 PROTECT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / VALLEY GUTTER P3 PROTECT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT P4 PROTECT GRAVEL SURFACE P5 PROTECT FENCING (INCLUDING FOOTINGS AND GATES) P6 PROTECT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN AND POST P7 PROTECT RETAINING WALL P8 PROTECT STORM SEWER P9 PROTECT STORM SEWER STRUCTURE 10 PROTECT SANITARY SEWER P11 PROTECT SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE P1 PROTECT TREE REFER TO SHEETS C1.40-C1.46 - UTILITY PLANS FOR X1 TREATMENT X2 REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR TREATMENT Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651.227.7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEYROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA 'L),• DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da 10/04/2019 Revisions PUD FINAL PLANS 05/11/2020 1 1 Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawn: BJD Check DAR North REMOVALS PLAN OVERALL 1 CI •1, Scale: 1 "=60' C1010 f 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ID MN C A B C E F G I 211 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 215 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 221 WOOD LINO LAKE 223 LIN NOTES: 1. REFER TO SHEET C1.21, SITE PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES. 2. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. SITE STATISTICS: NORTHEAST PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0 NORTHWEST PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 0 MAIN PARKING TOTAL STALLS = 77 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED = 4 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED = 7 LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS 1 DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) c2.1 DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) C —7PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK 23 24 2.1 2.1 PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB 3 4 5 2.1 2.1 5 PROPOSED BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENT 8 2.1 PROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTO 2.1 PROPOSED URBAN STREET PAVEMENTe 2.1 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 2.1 17 18 PROPOSED DECORATIVE METAL FENCE 2 1 01 PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN 10 11 12 13 14 15 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 O PROPOSED BOLLARD a ® PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL O PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) 24 8 C2.1 2.1 ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) 22 ( c2.1 d PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION FES 1 2 ( ) 2.1 2.1 + PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) ET ►� PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) 0 ® PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) 2 ® PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS • PROPERTY LINE Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651.227.7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. W04j. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEYROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 P IX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA ZL OR DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da 10/04/2019 Revisions Num PUD FINAL PLANS 05/11/2020 1 1 Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawn: BJD Check DAR North SITE PLAN OVERALL Scale: 1 "=60' 0 30 60 C1 ■ 2o 1 2 • 3 4 5 6 MN C A B C C 12 F G 1 WETLAND 1 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 LLS EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 ENE PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 FENCE 1 ' EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 2C17- NORTH-' PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33- _ - ` \ \ 15 15 \ 2 1 25' WETLAND BUFFER 2.1 \ DRY BASIN 4P o Lor10 \ S F •Z� IDGE LANE , MN 55014 1.0' VOODRIDGE LANE LAKES, MN 55014 229 WOODRIDGE LANE-:. LINO LAKES, MN 55014 6 231 WOODRIDGE LAK LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Shed FENCE FALLS O.Ix NORTH LOT 8 11 1 LOT 7 11 1 LOT 6 1 1 1 LOT 5 1 1 1 LOT 4 1 1 1 LOT 3 1 11 LOT 2 LOT 9 FETICE COR, 0.5% SOUTH LOT 1 I 00-- ° 12 -f 13 °. C2.1 A ° 2.1 ° 7 1 15 N LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 19 LOT 20 C2.1 + LOT 15 \ \\ LOT 11 12 2 1 A ° • - a 9'X20' \ \ O O �� 0 STALLS (TYP) a \ 13 4D I `\ 4 C2.1 a c ` \ LOT 14 O + I / ^ ° 9'X20' 4" PAINT STRIPE @ 3' STALLS (TYP) y O.C. WITH WORDS +' "NO PARKING" (TYP) LOT 13--------- O N 12 ,i \ C2.1 .0 op \ LOT 12 -''' \ 9'X20' II \ \ STALLS (TYP) \ \ 4D \\ 20,0 ® . 24.00,1 40 0pti 24 0p ® 10 II POND 3P NORTH POND 1 I H 1R40.00, ,® _ 2.1 2412 20, C2.1 MATCH LINE /- - ` - 233 WOODRIDGE LANE /-' ° LINO LAKES, MN 55014 //-' \ \ � 2'x8' PAINTED CROSSWALK ���� 4" WHITE -��- PANELS @ 4' O.C. I PAINT STRIPE / / \• Z z C 239 WOODRIDGE LANE-/� \ `\ � LINO LAKES, MN 55014 �/� \ \ Z MAIN BUILDING o - J f op 0 O l I 241 WOODRIDGE LAh E$- /-' \ • LINO LAKES, MN 55014 /�' \ • > .0p do 411 .0 ' off_ ��/-' \ 12 1 G 245 WOODRIDGE L���hE -- \ 2.1 I LINO LAKES, MN 55014 /-- \ i 12 2.1 O ° 0 L 6 251 WOODRIDGE LANET:+.o ° `11- = LINO LAKES, MN 55014 -'� 13 w 2.1 4D \ U I 0 ` 1 n I I I I 253 WOODRIDGE LAN F `\ \ ' I I- - - - - - ---- - I -I I I I LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ v I I I I II I I I 4D \� ° I I I -----------I I I I I 255 WOODRIDGE LAN= I\ U U I I LINO LAKES, MN 55C 11-, I \ I I I I \ n nl I I --- ------ . \ I I I II I UI 1 ` `% _ \ r I \ ; I j 255 ASH STREET r I - 1- I SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 co % IL ------- . I W O 676 COUNTY ROAD J WEST 668 COUNTY ROAD J WEST v SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 � Ash Stia(County Road 8 g 10 Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus NOTES: 1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT. 3. SIGNAGE SHALL GENERALLY BE INSTALLED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB. SIGNAGE KEY NOTES O • MnMUTCD R1-1 (30"x30") 12 2.1 B O D O O MnMUTCD R5-1 (30"x30") ENTER 11 12 2.1 2.1 MnMUTCD R3-2 (24"x24") 12 2.1 O MnMUTCD (5411x30") NL ONLYIONLY11 R3-8ACA 12 2.1 O MnMUTCD R3-8AC 12 (36"x30") 2.1 NL ONL O MnMUTCD R3-8CA 12 (36"x30") 2.1 NL ONL AHEAD MnMUTCD W16-9P��J (24"x12 ) 2 1 O MnMUTCD W16-7P (24"x12") 12 2.1 O MnMUTCD W11-2 (24"x24") 12 2.1 LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS 1 DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) c2.1 DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) 10 11 12 13 14 15 d PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 ® PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL /11 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW - LEFT - PER MnDOT PMA-2 (72"x96") OL PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW - RIGHT - PER MnDOT PMA-2 (72"x96") O 2' x 8' CROSSWALK PANELS @ 4' O.C. 4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE @ 3' O.C. PROPERTY LINE d' STRIPING KEY DESCRIPTION E ice A s le 1ST DIGIT DIGIT WIDTH COLOR CO (4", 6", ETC.) W - WHITE 2ND DIGIT Y - YELLOW PATTERN S - SOLID D- DOUBLE EXAMPLE 4D 4" WIDE DOUBLE YELLOW PAINT GENERAL INFORMATION: THE ENGINEER'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIELD CONSULTATION AND INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PLACE NECESSARY "SPOTTING" AT APPROPRIATE POINTS TO PROVIDE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR STRIPING AND TO DETERMINE NECESSARY STARTING AND CUTOFF POINTS. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS, PAVEMENT EDGES AND EXISTING MARKINGS MAY SERVE AS HORIZONTAL CONTROL WHEN SO DIRECTED. EDGE LINES AND LANE LINES ARE TO BE BROKEN ONLY AT INTERSECTIONS WITH PUBLIC ROADS AND AT PRIVATE ENTRANCES IF THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY A YIELD SIGN, STOP SIGN OR TRAFFIC SIGNAL. THE BREAK POINT IS TO BE AT THE START OF THE RADIUS FOR THE INTERSECTION OR AT MARKED STOP LINES OR CROSSWALKS. A TOLERANCE OF 1/4 INCH UNDER OR 1/4 INCH OVER THE SPECIFIED WIDTH WILL BE ALLOWED FOR STRIPING PROVIDED THE VARIATION IS GRADUAL AND DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE GENERAL APPEARANCE. BROKEN LINE SEGMENTS MAY VARY UP TO ONE-HALF FOOT FROM THE SPECIFIED LENGTHS PROVIDED THE OVER AND UNDER VARIATIONS ARE REASONABLY COMPENSATORY, ALIGNMENT DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTROL CUIDE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 INCH. MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE APPLIED OVER LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. ESTABLISHMENT OF APPLICATION TOLERANCES SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY AS CLOSELY AS PRACTICABLE WITH THE PLANNED DIMENSIONS. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT PROJECT LIMITS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS IDENTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER SHALL BE REMOVED BY A METHOD APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651.227,7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 24cfA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA Z �- &" qNW DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da 10/04/2019 Revisions Description Date Num Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawn: BJD Check DAR North STRIPING AND SIGNAGE PLAN OVERALL Scale: 1 "=60' 0 30 60 1m2 10 Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus MN C A \ I Q n u n i rl n A c I I I; I � I NOTES: B C C E F G I.l FENCE FALLS 0.1% SCUM A. IDGE LANE 16* MN 55014 IGN VOODRIDGE LANE LAKES, MN 55014 dui 229 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 231 WOODRIDGE LAN 7 v LINO LAKES, MN 55014 C — — — — — MATCH LINE — — — — - 233 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 /! z g� 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 241 WOODRIDGE LAf LINO LAKES, MN 55014 245 WOODRIDGE U N7 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 Ck 251 WOODRIDGE LANE o LINO LAKES, MN 55014 V \ 253 WOODRIDGE LAHE'stg LINO LAKES, MN 55014 255 WOODRIDGE LAId LINO LAKES, MN 55t,"Irf rd TT o t a �a m 1. REFER TO SHEET C1.23, GEOMETRIC PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES. 2. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. LEGEND BASELINE FOR DIMENSIONS PI POINT OF INTERSECTION PT POINT OF TANGENCY PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPERTY LINE LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651.227.7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 24cfA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA rLL . /)Y" DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da 10/04/2019 Revisions Description jDate Num UD FINAL PLANS 05/11/202 Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawrx BJD Checic DAR North GEOMETRIC PLAN OVERALL Scale: 1 "=60' f 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus MN C A B C C E F M WETLAND 1 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 i t PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 / /J N8 / 9.2- 99. 1 E 00.1 EOFPROPOSED 100YR HWL = 90 00.3 ME \ - - - - 00.4 ME • I / / / / 02l9 I 02.9 02.9 � r 0 .9 12'PO/' �� �� � 7�" 99 8 • 4 4.1 / 1 1 0610 EOF 067ME-[ 10AMEN -.9 6.0 EOP 05.400 p6 05.7 ME - 1 06.7 EOF 1 ME I 07. 07.3 07.2 6.1 ME 06.2 ME 1pE 07.2 EOF O6 1 190� 907 25' WETLAN� BUF i R • / 1 07.6) `07 LOT L JT 707.0 J `07' LOT 6 LOT 5 70� `0 LOT 4 L T 38.2 J 08.7LOT 2 `08.9 LOT + / \ (Jd B \ 9� 1/0T 9 03.3 ME 14 / 14 14 14 14 14 1 14 '. 14 M 14 B-10 o2.s \\ \ / 2.1 a4 C2.1 2.1 C2.1 2.1 2.1 \ 08.7 C2.1 2.1 02.0 EOF - 99.3 ME / 2.1 jO I / 07.6 07.4 v, 7070 �0.0 07.07' f18.2 08.7 's 0.� 08.9 i 1 1 DRY BASIN 4P Oz.9 /\ / Lqf 10 14 9 I I 1 N\ W 1 ME - I 9q+ `09.8 M 2.1 a 90 I 1 \ \ BOTTOM =SLOPED AT 1% 02.9 /•' r /- .... \\ \ HWL = 900.89 / 0 q 1 \\ \ EOF =902.00 I 1 \ • / 07.5 / 08.5-�^ I 07.1 06. 05.6 06.2 05.6 5.5 \ 07.3 07.7 07.5 07.9 tD OLQ / 06.3 06.4 ) 906 06.0 06.5 05.9 8 07.6 O I mole / �/ os.s o&B-7 08.0 ozs 12 01.6 2.1 \\ 99. �E I I 6.5 05.6 05.6 0 .5 07.3 r 07.7 I 07.2 E 1 �\ ,}�/� 15.9 E,,t OL5 �0 08.6 o I \ \ \\ I `� I I I 1 -05.9 / 06.n off, 07.9 0 °� I\ \\ 99.7 ME I 1 06.2OF 05.9 07.0 06.1 06.0 0 0 .0 07.2 08.6 \ 99.8 ME I 4 907 90 / 1 \ \\ ME 98.0 I \ )6.2) 06. 0 06.7 08.4 1 ° 1 07.3 - 07.1 1 07. E I ME� _ I 07.3 / 47 07.1 0 0 07. T '1�.3 07�,3 08.7 08.7 07 \ \ \ •\ / L 16/ ,o ,,, u LOT LOT 20 08.2 14 0 0 0 0 G \0 r 7. 14 D�iii O`07.70 1 2.1 T3 071 054 07.3 0 .6 2.1 8.7 i I \ � h74- 0 07.3 EOF � f 05.6, IDGE LANE 00.9ME ¢ YY`` S7/ ' E / i°�1 / // / 21 \, oys MN 55014 ME \ \ 2 J`\ L0106.3 = / �� / 06.2 / 06.9 / 07.3y y a� ^t 5.7' 06.5 \ \ ` �Di \ \ \ I I I I \ ME 05.7 6 of r�� / 07. E \ 05 3p p, `CO2.1 os.3 os.1 /"I 06.> // // 0 9�_03 �1 / // 05.5 / •-06.8 ,1P / 94� 05.8 07.� I 11 \ \ 05.8 A- 06.0 \ W. .8 ME ` \ / / 06.3 r06.6 > OS `♦ / 06.9 07. 1 / r \ 0 \ \ 04.7 / / 05.3 07.II e 89 • -06.. i o6 05.5 06.6 f n 07. E 1 / 04.5 \ 06.0 _ � O^ 2 \ 06.9 � 07.2 - 06.4 „5 2 \ \ 07.1 14 - `9`z 04.7 \ 2.1 / OB. 1 \ 10.0 \ ZI .5 0g ` err 61 I 07. E \ \ I 04. B- 07.1 6.6 � OflW9 p `a oT 1 07 5 0 1 IVOODRIDGE LANE \ \\ I I \ 05' 5 1 \ 0711 07. II I 1 / \ •. . .o Z6 10.0 � •zl I J LAKES, MN 55014 \ i \ w / \ 08 \\ - ozo ' 07 ° \r \ 'ro oa4 I I \ \ L50T 13 �6.57 \ / 10.0 2.1 i 07. 06.9 ! 15 y \Y \ 2.1 \ 05.6 �� \- •� 007.5 2.1 r�Tc \\-- 1 r 098 0 7 07.1 E I I 1 1 \ E / 06.2 •fl0 q h> 6.3 06.3 ; 0.0 r r r r"FFC`- 898:5� 1 J 06.5 99 D P11.1 I \I \ 7 '-� . 14 '� aRCMas<'a4 D E \ \ /+/ 6.2 �6• OUT C RB 2.1 r r r 2 1 rrr \ \ 229 WOODRIDGE LANE �s 14 g0-os6 06. OF 0, Oss r r r rrr 15 \ LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / (06.2 C2.1 90A ^ IP \ / oa.a- �r r r �14 r 2'1 09.1 \ e \ III \ / • �°j / O TCU 06.1 `� .3 09.2 Cl I 06.7 ' �8. r 2.1 r \ 04.2 / 05.4 07. 08. 09.8 'rrr r r r r r r 06.9 05.0 \ 08.7 08.9� VAZOP-91 07. i BEGIN T 07. E�1� TIP 09.8 �r a -MAR 89L.9' .895 0 07.6 OUTCU UTCURQ� rrrrrr \ 09.0 I II T C R 05.7 906 / D TIP / NO TIP O,W r r r q'}r 1 07.� UT CURB 08.9 1 1I 08.6 09.8 rrrrrr O 1 / EGIN T \ r r r r r 1 o \ rn 9 �LrPrC-"MI 0' r 1 231 WOODRIDGE LANE / A •� Tcu B os✓ r r r r LINO LAKES, MN 55014 i r , go1 BEGIN TIP \ ( � POND 3P NORTH POND � � �� 088 • OUT CUR -xacrrsa-a rr rrr 1 BOTTOM = 886.00 1 ro r r w \ \ ` i ro oz8 o9s 15 • 1 � HWL = 900.73 08.7 � 08EMD TIP / 07.5 08.7 . ���]y, � "•/ 0 1 NWL = 896.00 C 08.3 \ UT CURB ` 08 2 08.5 \ EOF = 901.90 , of P OF p9.1 \ \ 1).0 J os.z I 08.4 p 08.5 - 08.6-I_ \ \ 12 11 08.8 08.( 07.: \ 09.2 09.8 2.1 7. E 2.1 C2.1 09.3 09.7 rrr r \ 08.6 08.0 0 .5 1 08.1 10.1 r 16 r r 2.'I 09.3 1 08." B IN TIP 08.5 1 v, 08.5 OUT RB 08.9 �•6 08.7 09.8 2.1 \ 2 08.2 07.8 01 09.7 � 'rrrrr 1 08. 09. 08.1 5tl@ IP ' y..� OUT CUR 09.5 10.3 r r r1r rrrrr 10 233 WOODRIDGE LANE \ �� \ \ u B 088 �c8.z o r 1-- r r r r r 9 09. 8.5 10.1 i T _ \ I II LINO LAKES, MN 55014\\\ ` \ 0a.6� r \ 8.7 � � U RB r � �5� � r .--EI cv�-= •mom: I /�. \ • � rrr rrrrr r FFt S99.•'•� I1 I I -1 1 r r r rrrr r �ARCN48',9� r Of \ _ 09.8 `- -- 0 16 r-/r r _FF.E.z 00.8 \ 09.2 BEG1 r r �ARCN-Y8' r r r r r r r r \� 111 \ \ o2.s \ to. \\ ouTeu 2.1 rrrr rrrrrr rr o \.� 00.5 �, 0 08.4 16 rr rrrrr/--•rrrrr o r r__ r r r r r r r r r r r INV- 10: SAFETY BENCH << 07. \ 2.1 1 / \� 89259 \ \ 07.7 0• 14 r 15rrrr rrrrrr 2.1 r 09. \\ 2.1 \ \ 2.1 rrrrr rrrrrr rr p 239 WOODRIDGE LANE b \ \ N9.2 \ \ FFE=90 r rrrr 16 rrrrr+ r LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ \\\\� 210 \ e.� \ 10•0� / \=ARCH95'-0\ r o9.s �/o11�I��I�Igl 2.1 \ \ r r r r r r r r r I \ \\\ •8 \p�0�7.8 \ �\ r r r r r 11.1 � 1 \ \ / \ 09.4 \ \ \ T ) 1 10.0 JJJ I I a4! \ \ •1• '" 998 I 10.5 \\ rr�rrrr = 1.0 r09.0 09.9 08. - 09.' \Y• ` 09.0 3 f+31 \ 02.9 699 07.0 ` BEGIN TIP 09.9 ; 10. 09.9 08.9 � o \\ °'bb0 °66F / 909 4 '- ` OUT CURB r r r 10.1 9.8 0 g61 o'-o /�1�YV/i iA �I1i1110.0 / r rrrr. +Jrrr 1 \ \ (9u / /� / 14 98.2 r r rrW�i rr r \ 1 1 241 WOODRIDGE LANE \' •11 02.9 r� 9ab BOTTOM L 9 02 10 / 2.1 • 5r r r 2 1 / 10'WIDE B%MAX 02.i '+1!'' ��� 05.9 / , • r rE -8 35'� 16 I O6. M LONGITUDINAL SLOPE, 2% rr r r 08.5I I LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ m / 105 MAX CROSS SLOPE • - , 0 9 / 98.2 98.. 2.1 MAINTENANCE ACCESS 0 10.5/ 98.5� 985 98. r r PrE , 08.4 I 1 99.2. rr rrrl��r rrr I 03.9 i 99.03 2 14 r To 10.0 99.7 r 1 1 0 \ 10.0 = 1 \ \ 0 \ .B• 10. 99.9 r 1 \\ 9 11 I I oIC.7 E 1 245 WOODRIDGE LANE \ \ \`\\ OUE c TB 901 N os 2.1 r 09.9 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \•\\\\\ \ -015 r 15 _ 9 I \1 G UTI I 01.7 0 2.1 10.0 \ �' I 06.4 / I \I I 01.9 90 P8. r I� / 09 09 06. p 02.2,EOF .5 •90q , S 1 uD IP BOS. � 0 07.1 06. I I / 40 \ \ 9� ' / 903 os.o os. 07.0 II111 \\\ \\\ 903 02.7 oa. 9os �19 TIp __ s 907 11 1 I 1 1\\\\\\\\ \ \ 02.9 02. 02.0 02.6 02.7 3.1 9 03.4 v 5.9 05.5 l 06.2, \ I 06.1 6. ME 1 0-02.3 03.2 04.7 06.4 02.2 01. 01.4 01.7 o'I' 02.0 r 02.5 03.2 03.5 005 6 0 Q2 06.7 O6 0 6 06.3 I \\ \11 \ \ \\ 1 { 9p - 02.3 02.9 04.9 5.3 04.35.3 \�� 6.4 05.9 0 . 06.4 I \ 251 WOODRIDGE LANE \ \\\ ��\ \1 1 01.5 020 02.2 o3.2 b LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ II t Ip 2 02.1 oz.6 3.5 03.8 05 o5s g0 OTC I os. � \ 1 1 3.3 02 ` � .6 03.9 O5. 06 f 05. \ 07.1 08. \ \ % I I 2.1 02.2 06. 06�2 ME \\ I \ I I 1 1 01, 27 1.5 01. 2 \ \ ME M� \ \ 02.2 02. � \ 011. 253 WOODRIDGE LANE /' \ 1 02. ' ��_ / ( 1 I I 1 I I 1 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 S89°40'47"E 0 \n�\ME 1 ` _021 - 1 1 56.71 40 4 E / \ _ _ I I ME1 20.3 / 034 2 I / / 1 y I \ 321 \ I 1 6 / / \\ \03.k p �\ �E 02.7 255 WOODRIDGE LANE �O►� ` 022 � I \ I LINO LAKES, MN 55014 9-0 \ 7.8 I {I yn S89044� 'A `\ �' \ 1 \�� _% l IcyJ - I - \ / 05. 1 80.95 80.95_ 01 015 \\ 1 \ \ \ �/ // w t 02.2. \\ 01.2 1.8 \ \\ I 3 •1 tl� te 3y 02.3 / 1 °, I I I 1 o\i / I I a 02.1 02.3 ME 02.2 .5 \ ® L 05 M C I \ \ 02.1 \ \\� 1n II V� r< 02.5 ME 255 ASH STREET 02.8M�SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 27ME> Z%,\.� 02. \ I 02.4 \ 26.20v/ 02.21 \\I I I I I e1 \ 1 pp I 2 .1 i� I / �s I r o2; 02. �� 1 02.7 \ 1 - - \ i IV I / I I 02.4 ME - �p I Q I 0,28.1 F. 3 02.8 ` -� " \ 1 - - 907 1 90, \ / 01.81IHEY I •l / 9SM OAISS / nn9 90 - 04.8 1�s^• 38 ' NOTES 1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. BENCH MARKS (FIELD VERIFY BEFORE USING) BENCHMARK: MNDOT MONUMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF SUNSET AVENUE OVER 35W Elevation = 929.283 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF ASH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 906.81 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUANDRANT OF ASH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 903.48 (NGVD29) SITE BENCHMARK: THRESHOLD ELEVATION ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING LOCATED AT 6011 HODGSON ROAD. Elevation = 905.36 (NGVD29) LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS 1 DETAIL 1.11) NUMBER (TOP) c2.1 DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) �O$ EXISTING CONTOUR k 909•9 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION `955 - PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 01-954.6 ME = MATCH EXISTING - - - - - - - PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS 16 C2.1 ISS13-1 APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATION 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) C2 .1 2.1 ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) G 4 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES) 211 2.1 PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) 01, N PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) "22 1 ® PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) 2 1 FLOW ARROW PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPERTY LINE FFE LEGEND - r r r r r r I FFE = 898.5 = ARCH 88'-0" BASE 11 IT' FFE = 905.5 = ARCH 95'-0" SLAB ON GRADE FFE = 893.5 = ARCH 83'-0" ELEVATOR PIT LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651.227.7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEYROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 P IX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da 10/04/2019 Revisions Description I Date Num UD FINAL PLANS 05/11/202 Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawn: BJD Check DAR North GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OVERALL Scale: 1 "=60' 0 30 60 f 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 d iD Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus MN C A B C C E F G I.l NOTES 1. REFER TO SHEET C1.41, UTILITY PLAN NORTH WATERMAIN, FOR NOTES. 2. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES. LEGEND 1 REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS C2.1 DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) EXISTING CONTOUR `955 - PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �54.6 ME = MATCH EXISTING - - - - - - - PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER " PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN 16 25 4 PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN (FD) / DRAINTILE (DT) / PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN (PPD) C2.1 C2.1 2.1 r2 4-Y s O PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH) C2.1 2.1 ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB) 22 C2.1 4 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION FES 1 2 ( ) + PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD) 11 N PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV) 12 2.1 ® PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) 13 2.1 OVERTICAL PROVIDE MINIMUM 24" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDE BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH. 15 CENTER ONE LENGTH WATERMAIN PIPE ON CROSSING. 2.1 ® PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS - - - PROPERTY LINE WETLAND 1 EXISTING 2YR HWL = 899.66 PROPOSED 2YR HWL = 899.68 EXISTING 10YR HWL = 900.13 PROPOSED 10YR HWL = 900.03 EXISTING 100YR HWL = 900.72 06.0 EOF 06.7E01 00.1 EOFPROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33 .-�.-■- -.-.---------■-■-.-.- - - 7 06.0 EO 07.2 EOF • W % 06.0 EOF / 1 r, r� / • `0r 6.1 EOF I • 25'WETLAND BUFFER 0763 `07.4 o7.OJ �07.0 07.0� `07.4 08.2J `087 `089 / LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 LOT 1 LOT 9 INV. = 901.4 INV. = 901.0 INV. = 901.0 INV. = 901.0 INV. = 901.4 INV. = 902.2 INV. = 902.7 INV. = 902.9 INV. =901.6 S=27• S=27' S=27' S=27' S=27' S=27' S=27' S=28' S=3dd1QQ' Vy- W=388'' o�W=38' W=38 =06 W= f.738' W=45' 02.0 EOF � / � W - 07� ��.4 0 1 r 07.0 07.4 08.2 off � 08.7 08.9 08.9 07.5 07.6 07.0 07.0 07.0 DRY BASIN 4P / LOT 10 INV. = 901.5 1 BOTTOM =SLOPED AT 1 % I S = 31' HWL =901.00 W=43' 07.52 � EOF = 902.00 7 , i ODRIDGE LANE kKES, MN 55014 231 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ 07.3 07.1 07.3 4701r 17 LOT 16 INV. = 901.3 INV. = 901.1 S=38' S=52' • L 45 W = 29' W = 29' `OX V. = 9411633 EOF 07.31 07.1 S=36' • � W = 30' U LJ rV8.=9800.3 =,..., 07.3 W=88' ^� L 06.3 06.31 7 \ 7 V 233 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 01.9 E-V KV. 10:1 SAFETY M59 241 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 07.1 LOT 14 07.111NV. = 901.1 5=64' W=56' 2 \ �\ 0711 TOPOF AL 07.0 BOTTOM O WA 900 6.06.5 L / 0660T 13 06.5' _ INV. = 900.5 S=73' W=63' 06.2 06.2 oe° LOT 12 INV. = 900.2 06.P/ 64' / = 64' 44' / �i / v 1 OP L909 V BOTT M WALL 900.5 V / \ POND 3P NORTH POND \ J BOTTOM = 886.00 \ \ HWL=900.80 V / \ EOF = 901.90 \ J 11 \ J 07. ��07.6 1 08.7 08.7� I INV. = 901.3 LOT 19 LOT 20 S = 38' INS/. - 901.6 INV. = 902.7 W = 29' is 38' S = 39' ��73,-1 I �07.6 W=29' 08.71 / %10.5 ! \ L 105 N 10.5 10.5-7V�C / FFE = 898.50 10 51 , -10.5 =ARCH 88'-0" 06. EOF �� \ \ tos J 10.5 C\ , ELEVATOR PIT70.5� �\ J FFE C893.-0 I ARCH 83'-0" C\ 10.5� \ � v r\ 11o.s FFE = 898.50 10.5 =ARCH 88'-0" � � I v r\ V r 10.5 L 10.51 \� 10.5 \ 10.5� V 'EOF = 901.90 \ 9­10.5 J \ FFE = 905.5 ARCH 95'-0" ELEVATOR PIT: \ 105 A H TOP W LL 907 \ BOTT M L 10' WIDE 8% MAX \ �� LONGITUDINAL SLOPE, 2% MAX CROSS SLOPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS - \ � � I \/� \ 02.2 O 1� 255 ASH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55126 / FFE 8930' =ARCH 83'-'-0" ` FFE = 898 \ =ARCH 811- 8'-0" 10.5 \ FFE = 905.5 10.5 Z= ARCH 95'-0" \ L 90 .8 10.5 R S y 10.5 / ° 0 G - - - - \ MAIN BUILDING 98.5 �.5 4ELEVATOR PIT: FFE = 893.50' = ARCH 83'-0" FFE = 898.50 qll r- - - - - - - - - - - II rJ U ' I I � I I n � I----------- I J I I fi I U U \ I --- L---------J I I I I I I r------------iII I I 1 I` I\ U U I I I / \v \\lI II II 'I / x V \ / x lawI&OO s 91v-D.ao \ ;--- �-----i- Io��--I-----�--- -- i t- \ PL -Ju // I / I I I I �J _-_j I I \ I I I r�x x \1 J i 1 I I I 161 34 - - 1 rain"-9ol ss I 1 1 p N 11111 It RN-901.22 W-Moo CoS �V 3` � 74 1 I �F L LYNGBLOMSTEN 14115 ALMOND AVE W ST. PAU L, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1651.227.7773 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 24cfA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA DAVID A. REY Registration Number 40180 Da(10/04/2019 Revisions Description jDate Num UD FINAL PLANS 05/11/202 Comm: 196015 Date: 10/04/2019 Drawrx BJD Checic DAR North UTILITY PLAN OVERALL 1 Scale: 1 "=60' 0 30 60 ■ • •y LYNGBLOMSTEN LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENT ACCESS Jd n - i Ma, VI IV WOODRIDGE LANE II .' I ■. . R .. -MININ • • —•. ! .- . . n .. - ■ I ■ fi It Orr Ike 16 I: a t06 I �. W. mr;is _ - IF 09 Orr — looms .ray' J i #' aJ I• _ — — — — — — — — — - ••• -iffia u t ip :: . • _ /i�_1 Cl�c-NOW7 "t �!!■ •r Anp■ It 40 40, low it i monsti -- - ► ■ q _ Is n ONLY ONLY ONLYI Q 4 A cla i Y I OF gum- aft 11I ar jr ONLY ONLY ONLY I - • l ,w w di ' RIGHT LANE MUST RIGHT LANE TURN - ' �A ;I dui 'I Eli Y_ RIGHT ■�I . , -MUST ir w TURN RIGHT PIS M NNINNINNINNNINNINNIIIII - • •• 11 1 1 •• I �. i rt i �" • I ' 1 iME EN � .. _ Ilk, . _ _ _ ��. .--a---■--g--r r — — — I i�a . _ I 1i a . •. .•fir ONLY ONLY ONLY - r r I ' I` y _ J, op Sol z , i ; - l ■ Y n i 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 L0.1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN NOTES Lyngblomsten Senior Communities I_1 A B C D E F FENCE FALLS `� BASIC U S E AREA 0.1± SOUTH ` (- - STORMW�TER DRY BASIN HWL -FENCE FALLS FENCE .1± FALLS I Q F \ \ \ \ \ \ w ,� 1\ 2,t NORTH o° BASIC USE AREA P 77 ^86 1Q o o g °'± NORTH BASIC USE AREA Aki6 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -57- '7E_ 8 I i V� R •-Q� 88 98 * 1 A ,pP -, 8P0-----// 34 \ 4 99 661STURBF P/Q 74 + A 75 �� 79�e80'`,.`85 87 90 /94 96- �.106 107 90 "ISIORBED ARLFA \S2C5 1LS N .2 0 - v 2 2 PO 35 58 64 772 91 92' * 14 105 108 _ 127, 120 0 ,+ 0 Ap 97'\99°� 3 111 114� 117 r \.07`131 124 121 z_ + 0 31 r 55 59, ¢3 2 q 67 2 A8g 906„EL 84 1 104 A * 110p '0 �C 115 129 128 122 „ 38 60 O „pP* '100 A01 1091, 118 �- 123 113 n m PO 9 1�9 �0 41 143.V 61 •� S1 EL 82 O \ 0 9 0 103 `o 116 +20"0 w � 1 R 53 OP 146 1n5 "q � 62 T65"EL 83 102 119 o / 5 ; �� �� � ' �1 � �"EL 19P1 4678- / O 4 /g, P 3 ,� 0 14 14 A 142 140 179\ //,/ 130 � / x P I / 676 6"P 9 10' % 159 158 /i>< 4 + 1 152. PO147 + 25'OA9 +� /q , 150 148 141 ,315•• \l` e ? \ 4675 '\ O .\/ / "�0-151 A` �"PO 266 135- 136 19 4674I I Y'S 'PO 149�' p 264 �\ " E Q 4673- w �• ( . lfif'EL 71 -,9 _� 137 I g \ ^ � J PO 262 �J + 23" 0 I \ O 4672 w / • 8'EL 3 6 a O I QO 256 261 * 12'FR 265 138� 08 II 9 0 / I v , 12 I 258 • 9 PO 263 �� 11 EL , 467E "¢�;65 '�'P° 1 ,, �,1'25 259 ISTURBED AREA 39 4670 40+ 166 �9 P 161 a, -� O 9p6 p / J I»PO 260 > 4 L 4669 g' 1 / / / / • 13"F� 170 16 yO 168 \ c 2538'P0 254 / , 1 „A 466E w, I "PO 167 O, l t O�j ,�' O 8' R 252 �I 287 p� g06 �O • 11' EL p 4667 ., I "" :188 18687 0 / ••Q 199 / 25050 '271P0 27"� 87S I C U S E AREA 4681 908 C63 4664 o I ,1s5 PO 1a9P 1 )'FR 269 107 907 4saz '0 90 20, ,7, 8'� 8'P E °P 272�"PO 26,NETLAND BUFFER �� r>.` 4679 I Q ;)I;; 184 249 TO 275 4683-9'BO 4680 2 »B0 4665. 1 466� �/ w 182 9O O 244 245 248247 O•„ 273 274 i �I LL Pi 1' 183 i 236 „ „POf %'� O 243 P0246b Q� * 15 R 3----�.. ppCO 202 1T 179 O 232e 231 • 9'PO 235� 242 315 k 4662 �I I 174P091S0� 230- 233 J 2 241 / 317 316-0 276 � 285 �p + p0 M -� �- P�240 314 .-284 O 4685 UJ / 229 - ' 3113 29" 0 / 203 � 17 226 0 � 234 _ O 238 239 ' 8'PO � 319 � 9� PI + "E 286 O + 4684 30 OA + " I 1 9' PO 228 •Q N 3 „S\ U e� --moo 310 ,w 20 ,� O 2e 227 CI 9,• O • 334 O • 13" 0 32- 318 j 277 2.80 .9 _ � 0 _ • �anr ��, i ! ,fro OM82 C / / \ 2�296 \ \ „ 1 O : 8� 335 342 F331 332 330 9' PO 326. 3239, PO 322 \� Q\ �,•279E Z283� 9 L 288 06 906 „g0+ 4601IO6 45 O O' ^� U 3 \� 178 337 V O 309' 224 `Z 341' �,�ri 308O� \ `L 99 / � 0 327 / 281 4600`Lc,O 4598 'Lti ' ^ / I340 1 'P0345„ 328 O 1=306�y�Pl 307 y�290 0� + O lO VJ 223 ° 8" 339 '(3) PO "P 324 ,Q 321i %r�\\ 9 g0, / O 3n43,344 "PO 346 O 325 6 P 353 8' 304 „EL 4655 'S 4597 + 911 �J + 4602 4654 v / \ • 8)'EL 302 16, i4653 / �210 2 12'PO348 'PI 351- 303 �, 4652 O8 wl \219 \"PO 347 "PI 349' 8'PO 352 �p •1S 301 »EL 4656 „g 6 OP 1966 ,OP III / -I�211 -?`� • 1 'E 354 0 299 300 7 EL / 1� +0' 4603 1 1y 195E + 1715\.. ,.PI 350^295 298L / » v 9O7 0 00+ 4604 °P �2»CE1965 •• 4660 z 216''. ( 1 297 �+ 4595 9,FIR ?0 9O7 4659 / „ 296'17» 291 6' 95 Y .� „EL 4657 C 4596 9 + I 0 / 90 1987 +21"EL N w 214 S +39"EL 292 ` 1 389 / L 908 1964 15"SP J 362 '1 293 '� ,�v' EL 04594� G 4658 I / / ♦ 1 \ \ BI 408 398 361` , 363 J 909 as / q\ 12 BO 355 7 4605 , I 3610/+40"EL4614 O 00 4606 .1 "BC4593 OAS �\ I / 1 \ 410' 409 �, � 396 / 1212 v� 407 3Pi/ Q\ 358 364 \� 4616 �j 4609 ` 4"0 (� - - - - - - - - /403 395 356 �\�- 'PI w -% 1963� / \ \`414 411 401` -r 357 359, 4617 4611 I- / A � 1"PI 406 , y`� I 36 6 4610 4.5 4 / F 404 402- 39�410�3 7 / /\ 46F2 »BO 4608 1989 +3p"pP P w / 418 ,F`' .F �, t0 '� I`-` q4 \ �� �4613 4607 00196270 �471»PO 479�/��fll 394 36 �C1 `V .,,PI 4623" • 1 'EL 'SpP ' 12'BC _1929q / 469 PO 478 PO 483 OS. \ "PI P 1990 +O 1986 1977� 1928 O 0 \ 1 "B0468 �„ `Y 463311 1 Sg \ C4Y�"P 480'0 482 QO » 393 1991 491 ^Q 4634 12 1985 EL 1978 ��ttn5,�v, B,�O ��1 S56\i 956 •QA / Q Q o T 1983+ »EL ,� 196E 'oA Q 4632 _ \ \ r a4 ,. 1 1996 „ �O / 1970 1957 P 19 948 ' M / 42 �\ 453 461466� 467 � 012" 0 PI I 4629 � ' 1995 1984. 1976 1972 1960 1955 P. 1927 /T 452 _ ���• PC481 486 1' � / \ \ 1992- 1 1878 1"Ph9 1 11 447\ 474 485 C.�EL 4630: 4631 99994 I" »\ 1975•,EL969 gi41959194 9iPl 472i 1, '� 1980 \ I : • 196 1952 / 24. 0 4&3 I 49 I +�� l 1949 / 4 465 6 � // � � �� �� •'E1926 � � w 475 P \ " �9 4636 » 4635 0 1 • 2 4501 PI 1879 0"E� 1973 1953 • 0 2C„ 1932a F'2 1924 I y 1979 "E\- 1947 1931 8 ,•4�V 444\445 .'` V\-515 487 609 07 �� � O „ �1850 1974 L 1944 194�� 1911/_ 3 BASIC USE ARE ������ 2,' - P 517 / 512 11PO `' "F�1943 'E 1945 ,• --\� 11 EL I �� "PC516 1Q 44f ( 513 508 -506 O \ 1934 1921 /1942 1933 1920 / 33 `` 437 519 E514 511 ' POND HWL 6F1940 1g36 9.1935 919 o 4`b•Q6 `435 i'�� .G2 �..... 518 ' �' g9� /1941 8' / y - 438- 522 584 / Q\ „Q\ ' 9' EL _ 1918 1 � 439 - L ° � 585 595 / /440 ..F, 5 520 '583' // 614,> l 1937 6 19�7 I / 524 - �../ 580 ' O 582 589 593 596 / 597 P\ 616 615E»6I 612 « 12' E _. » / * 14" �1939� �4503 1938 a 2' EI 1916 1881 579 r» 581 590 594 611 O O ' 17 E1882 9" 1915I o 1 O * 1 F 610 O -�i% 1913"E ,1 • z 578 588 598599/ O p O'P(4589 �� \'�1914 / \1 ££d,,"r0 C2�/S/Y✓J ^. ( 577 5S7 591 592 N - -_- 907 45 0 ■b o Et1997 / 5:iBl " '�� i - 'E4558 m 533 ` P 577 P 617 4591 O 4559 O L 1910 1912 534� 586 576 6011 60� Q592 . 8'P�4588'e00 20"EL+ ' S L4�557 g E(1998 E4502 • 1 1909 1908 � 1911 o 574 \ 4562 \ / / a • 536 53 7„ 572 573 ` 603O) 11" 0 • 4587 "4560 4561 �� 4564 E4956 O / O EI1999000 0 1907 w 575 602 6 9 P 67 @70 "BO 571 804 / /p,, 4563 ' 8a��F I F'� / / I 9"PO 538 x 569 " '� \\ •• 604 -% E 609 . �..� ., O �. El4506 *4504 10"p "Ci\ 01 J / .•QO q `I 568 E _� ,1904� J/ // 9Pp54 96 563J Q803 �- ALL TREES WITHIN BASIC USE / B1883 4505 i 903 / \ 7"PO 41 \ \ 805 802 2 1 "EL * 1'899D 7 - 2 561 560 ,801 506,,, / '' II 0 \1905 G Y 5 55 557 559, 807 8°6 »P1 6OS � E 607 DISTURBED AREA TO BE REMOVED 45°E PI18861898 1906 / 574�57_5"F 4570 44 P51�4543 65I09 00S29'FPCB/49O8 F4571 15549 0'`18�3 a P68\A6A,�8�1 81E8" 95 96 809 U �4451�2 826 % 84 PI 1 552 672 \828 83574 5,� -5Q84.4 832 4572 1874 548 673r 820 P 454175 185 \674 834333 45 �A1, 811 T608 "45465g 4511859 616` „F4544 P a'4520 4538 4519 870 1860 679 812 823838 6 Po 16"F2\ 7' 454p0 1569 1 »\18 r 669� 1677 683 822\ 843 8 47 .\� 1�4v34 » 4522\ -%/I\\ 1876 k� E1868 \. / - 684 I 1 1 1866 1867. 1856 82111'AS 10 4536 4535� 4523+ 1885 1561 9 / 668, 19 \ 685 817 `Z 820 ////\\\\ 9•, . g' ' S� F4533 4521 1877 \ q� 815 816 Q 847 / 840�x •• 838 1p' (v 4529 ° �, 1864-1862\ 1� 686 818 45, 4532 / 0 666 0" 819 4531 1 "F4524 18650� 18631 1855 w v 1 -687 8.13 814� 844 842,Fi-.i,`\" PI P4527 21"EL 2 + /7• `e 1852�1853 \ 851 Q� 850 846. 1145 841 ///qr 908 9 452E /_ 1 S46 " 1848 18 9� ••1 854 ` »��525 g, \ I� 1851 1841 1840 665F 688 854 853 8491 O� 4 °�1845C 1847 1549 �� I / - yA \ 1/2/'PI 1 9 � 4 cpp/ / _`'i� 19'EL 3+ ,.F. �1844 )'�L\ E,l� I �,\ 848 526 , 2 / 689' 1 1834 , 1839 / 664� 863 880 ,1 •Q� �1843-1842 / Pp6 Pp 66 691 690 855 = O 864 .,� 1807 1817 , 835 �( 661 \ qu \ 1809 1838 w - - / _ 663?O 660 F 2 10 1 6"__.,,859 862 / E (` 181E 1836 C3► 861 S81 1808- 8�,816 1819 1833 / 183 1_ / 659 / \, O• 0 865 ' 8 882 . 1,1519 ' 152�\ 1810 1815 1820 ••P1 0 " 10"P 658 693 857 866 90� 1522 �aS03 V\ 18\3�1821 1822 1824 „ 1830 1804 1831 1825 S85 1520 - k I„ � 6561 65 869 871 879 +15 1523 1805 1814 3 ••1832 1 11 / 657 - -„c S 878 883 1627 'l 1806 1813 \82 826_ 182 694 868 , \� t� 1( 4 1825 ro � O 827 I F 695 696 61 5 887 870 1'877 884 �; • 81524 24"EL 18011802 pi "EL N w L\ �. 872 �. 9A� I\ 1800 i� 97 698 _ = 653 `>, 9 873 V 5' CE 6 tr 887 - 886 V Q 1793 I Cw / 699 701 % S.yO ,1 888 C 626 1799 1789 P700 I _ 902 875 889 / 1•• 171 �'P88 703�9 4 874 890 1764- G1766 798 17941765 1�797 .CF /77� L3»79�EL 705-_: - o892 151E �` 1525 1625 1767 176E / 1791 17 / 7 4 \� ... 7 1526 1625 . 1'1 r 1776 177E �1786 891 I / 1 707 -% 706 90 5 89fi5 „894 \ 1763 �� �17691770 1775 "P\ �,,,lA 14• w / ■ 90\' �Q 1g,pA 1761 70 \1774'�»F1 1VT90� 1785- 908 "`900 2 897 •.�1517 89 ' 1771�1773 P 79 1782 I / 708 -7 1516 9 '1.780 ri KEY / \ 65 709\ 899 898 I / 11760 °1772 1781 3"' / 909 / \ 71 1 "I 711 910 0 � . 81515 � "OA 1783 7F�•• 716 -,I ��121 904 1 1759 1755 °p.�„ '15 911 912 PI 925 /\\ 1 / 1624 1629 1758 ...�. / t \6 b 717 " PI . �� _ 901 �N 10 40 \ 1630 /M 1756 1754 V ,1750 I �w / / \ 14 ...71E 913 9 141513 Cif OOi �'Se\ 1739'y5 1752. 1751 w TREE TO BE PROTECTED - DASHED LINE DENOTES ROOT ZONE / 719 /914 �2 945 1512 511 1736 753 / \ 94\3 /\ `'� g �'O�" / 1633 .,.,.� 1737y 0� c' 9156i 922_ '`� 3C ) 1514 I \ 1631 �$' 1738�C� 1740 gF, •• (� 7 920 923 944 .;1510 1634 909 g \" 173513�1732� /1749 1748` 1747 u J , 1622 1742 0 v 91680919 9 * 2'"CE 959 , ^ 957 1504 1505 1623 1734 rnm\ 1741 15" �L �� 11620 1 173/0 1743 1744 13,E TREE TO BE MITIGATED / / 1 6 9,7 n $v g656 k 1506 1509 - 1621 ,9O 632 727 746� / 47 3, L �' 6 6 �' 9" 1728 1729 �9' OA ��- C �- / \ 918 942 946 _., __ 12Ct 1635 / \ ' 1731 1745 Q w / \l :4� 9415"CE 955 r� 1803 1 '� 1619� _ 1725 v W / \ i TC ��9��48,% 15 1 " . 507 ` 1636� 1638 - \ ' �I41 F 12' PI953' 952 -02 �% / 1637 \ 1726 1722 954�'�I 1508 1618 G 11 1961 - 1 �949 �// 1 1617 161 �6 \g \ I\ L 1714 940 91, J �J /\ \ 1695• .11•F1 172,2 720 1711715 713 p 964 963 �'P 951 972 � 17 1613 %1 1694 „ 1698 •�"� � 1719 171E 13 'PT 950� \' • \ I 22 939 3 969 971 973 - 0 6 1696. 1719 171E 7'I 1712 C y 938 �5 966� 974 1501 �� 560� 615/ �2 9� 693 5 a.- 9 7 970% 976 9 1562 -� 171;- w '"' 1614 169 L' 1697 •��'1706 170E -i / ?v ,Q 1702 • 1710 w 975 a 1561 'I 12 v it z ■ TREE MITIGATION TREE MITIGATION TYPE MITIGATION TREES REQUIRED NOWESA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION DECIDUOUS 6" TO 12" DBH OR CONIFEROUS 12'-20' HT 91 NOWESA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION DECIDUOUS OVER 12"+ DBH OR CONIFEROUS 20'+ HT 122 (2:1 REPLACEMENT RATIO) NRCA / NRCEA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION DECIDUOUS 6: TO 12" DBH OR CONIFEROUS 12'-20' HT 58 (2:1 REPLACEMENT RATIO) NRCA / NRCEA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION DECIDUOUS 12"+ DBH OR CONIFEROUS 20'+ HT 9 (3:1 REPLACEMENT RATIO) NRPA TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRING MITIGATION 280 MITIGATION TREES PROVIDED 376 , __ 1609 639 1709 977 152E » 1527 t6 � 1610 + �n^ 1701 � c+ 1707 y T ,0 978' 1 1563 1608' , 1640 -1691 16998 {,Ir �yJn' 1/ 1641- - rn �"i"1645 936• 6" 1000 1'�'g \\%/'.1607- 1611 Imo/ 9 1705 ph,l - p , �i 23 I'/ 980 79 ,F/ 1557 �� 1564 1604 1603 „Q "ri 1700 1703, '\ 0,• I 9 / /I 98 21 984999 O a' 1559 1565- fig. 159� 1606 1 bU2 1660 O 1690 ? 935 9 981 998_ 1558 1566 r 15 111 0 1601 1689 8 PI 1684 1683682 934 1 r1 1572 98 1 605 / 168E 1686 1679� \ 33 'I EL v �I 15561567 1570 1685 1681' w 1569 7/1596 /595 1642--� 932 6 1551 k \ » 1661 16' 1 1675%ry�,�, J 6 L 1568 1573 \\ N" 1_ 2 11676 167E '\ a31 987 'EL 1552 \� 1594 1645- 1687 8°,�, 7`� 167�i r i` 724 930 "PI .15`53549 I'llGF' 15990 1593 ••OF' 1643 6 15 2 1674167 1672 �L `1 \ /4 1575%. 1652 929 1 1550 1576 158E 589 164g.+ �E� 1651 1654 '�� + 1574 1592 / '\ . 1587 1646 ��• • 1 ,�^ 1653 + 1670 �W=J EL 1577 1647 2 L g 165065' \l /a% a 1658 9 1656.,, E, w 928 988 $ 5'F 1579 &" � \,164E � AS 1669 J 644 M 1 0 0 °F, 1 „ \ ' 15/8 �x v5 16 7/1 `V 166 P 6 643 725 927 `� 0 15814,1583' 1649 1664�\ 989 5 \\\(Yla1S80 �1582 .1T585 �2 1659 �1666;�16671668 i 86 726 5 ,0 1 'Q S PI 786 1 783 781780 778 ,799. 794 787,�• 784 782- -779 777- C5 -4 785 746'Et745 800��2 �`O� „�177775 +23'P768 w r W ,�� \k2� gF774 77s r 773 642 728'' 727 OTC 74�\ \ r748 16 , :y770771 +28"I,. 744 766' \O 767 I � � 743 � P\ 764 "p 769 I ' E1729 \ \O .�763 762 �641 2 730 .1 1 9 735 741 1 742 761 �,' 'b 733 714 �' \ 760 \ , N Line of S 237 Ft. of SW 0 ,F" I �i� of SE 1% 5. 31, N T. 31' F.� +'\ ' 759 s 17, use w,woinocc \ 64 „ 731 0' 1736 �� �srares o 639 14 732 740 \ 757 638 _ ••F,\�749 1 \ SP637 0, E 738 'El \ , 1 F' F,756 T - - - W I ❑ I 750 20" A 753 1 755 TI 8 EI739 J \ 752 w 44""`636 / O� 635 O +48754 C wo 634 � 8 S 633 7 2 + 751 -O 8 3\ � „'632 m J ECP W `0 86630 BASIC USE 629 J 628 DISTURBED A� A " -❑ ❑ N 7627 9 w -C ' c••�� os � w x 626 I �- IO 10"SP 3 I 625 ,n I I 624 \ O 10' 623 `o s Sv �o 622 I w 9p? =�8 y03 „62SP 907 O Ory 620 \ w I - se 4� L SMH RIM=901.21 cevtseoe 616 '9p4 SI N O � L�� 9 1 a w� 618' IGBOX - � I 02 O - GAS - G S - - - - - TO ?F0 i FFFFFffffF Ab--{ MHO . GAS - GAS - GA - F FO F TO 0H TO - �� F EL - - - - - INV-891.1 Ash Street (County Roc J) TEL a_ a_ RIM=900.96 INV=89Z22 SMH (C.S , AS GAS RIM- 02.74 INV= 2.03 SIGNAL B1�VNiXOUS BUTTON ■ qs GAS GAS GAS GAS STMH A s f r e f RIM=900.75 �" J (� ((�ZL�n ty Road INV=89706(N) Nv=a9s.95(E) licly Traveled Roadway) 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 3. SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS Hodgson Road, 4. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 5. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 6. THIS TREE PRESERVATION PLAN IS BASED ON A SITE AND TREE SURVEY PROVIDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. SEE SURVEY AND TREE SURVEY FOR ORIGINAL INFORMATION, TREE INVENTORY, AND BENCHMARKS. 7. ALL ROOT PROTECTION ZONES (5' OUTSIDE DRIPLINE) OF PRESERVED TREES MUST BE PROTECTED WITH MIN. 4' HT. ORANGE SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS MAX. 6' O.C. PRIOR TO AND THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 8. STAGING, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, PARKING OF VEHICLES, FOOT TRAFFIC, CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER ACCESS Lyngblomsten ROUTES, AND ANY FORM OF DISTURBANCE OR ACTIVITIES THAT MAY CAUSE COMPACTION ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN ROOT PROTECTION ZONES AT ALL TIMES. SEE CIVIL FOR LOCATIONS. 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 9. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY 55108 DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 10. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 11. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PRESERVED TREES Tree # Species DBH Condition Stems 1 Oak, red 18.0 Good 1 45 Aspen 10.5 Fair 1 46 Aspen 10.0 Fair 1 157 Aspen 7.0 Gootl 1 170 APP 13.0 Fair 1 201 Spruce, blue 11.0 Good 1 203 Spruce, blue 7.0 Good 1 204 Spruce, white 6.5 Fair 1 205 Elm, Siberian 8.5 Good 1 208 Spruce, white 10.0 Fair 2 207 Spruce, white 9.0 Good 1 208 Elm, Siberian 14.5 Good 1 P09 Spruce, white 7.5 Good 1 210 Fir, balsam 9.0 Good 1 211 Pine, red 10.5 Good 1 212 Willow 12.5 Gootl 1 213 Pine, red 16.0 Gootl 1 214 Pine, red 13.5 Good 1 215 Pine, red 13.5 Good 1 216 Pine, red 14.5 Good 1 217 Pine, red 14.0 Good 1 218 Pine, jack 10.5 Good 1 410 Pine, jack 12.0 Fair 1 411 Pine, jack 15.0 Fair 1 412 Pine, jack 9.0 Good 1 413 Pine, jack 6.5 Good 1 414 Pine, jack 6.5 Good 1 415 Pine, jack 7.5 Good 1 416 Pine, jack 3.0 Fair 1 417 Pine, jack 9.5 Good 1 418 Pine, white 4.5 Good 1 419 Cherry, black 8.5 Good 1 420 Pine, red 8.5 Good 1 421 Boxelder 10.5 Good 1 422 Pine, red 7.0 Good 1 423 Pine, red 6.5 Good 1 424 Pine, red 6.0 Good 1 425 Pine, red 6.0 Good 1 426 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 427 Pine, red 4.0 Fair 1 428 Pine, red 4.0 Fair 1 429 Pine, red 3.5 Fair 1 430 Pine, red 3.0 Good 1 431 Pine, red 5.0 Good 1 432 Pine, red 5.0 Good 1 433 Pine, red 4.0 Good 1 434 Pine, red 4.5 Good 1 435 Aspen 7.5 Good 1 436 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 437 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 438 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 439 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 440 Aspen 8.5 Good 1 441 Aspen 14.0 Fair 2 442 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 443 Birch, paper 6.5 Good 1 444 Aspen 10.5 Good 1 448 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 449 Aspen 17.0 Good 2 450 Aspen 9.5 Good 1 451 Pine, jack 7.0 Good 1 454 Pine, jack 5.5 Fair 1 455 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 456 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 457 Pine, jack 8.5 Good 1 459 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 521 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 522 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 523 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 524 Aspen 8.5 Good 1 525 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 526 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 527 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 528 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 529 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 530 Aspen 9.5 Good 1 531 Oak, red 11.0 Good 1 532 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 533 Pine, jack 12.0 Good 1 534 Pine, jack 12.5 Good 1 535 Cherry, black 6.0 Good 1 536 Pine, jack 14.0 Good 1 537 Aspen 8.5 Good 1 538 Aspen 9.0 Good 1 539 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 540 Aspen 9.0 Good 1 541 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 542 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 543 Aspen 9.5 Fair 1 544 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 545 Aspen 11.0 Good 1 546 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 547 Aspen 8.6 Good 1 548 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 549 Aspen 7.5 Good 1 550 Pine, jack 14.5 Good 1 551 Pine, jack 9.0 Good 1 552 Pine, jack 11.0 Good 1 553 Pine, jack 8.5 Good 1 554 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 555 Pine, jack 12.0 Good 1 556 Pine, jack 10.5 Good 1 562 Pine, jack 11.5 Good 1 563 Pine, jack 8.0 Good 1 564 Pine, jack 7.5 Good 1 565 Pine, jack 13.0 Good 1 566 Pine, jack 11.5 Fair 1 567 Pine, jack 11.0 Good 1 568 Pine, jack 8.0 Good 1 569 Pine, red 6.0 Good 1 570 Pine, red 12.5 Good 1 618 Spruce, blue 11.0 Good 1 619 Spruce, blue 9.0 Fair 1 620 Spruce, blue 7.0 Fair 1 621 Spruce, blue 7,5 Fair 1 622 Spruce blue 7.5 Fair 1 623 Spruce, blue 10.0 Fair 1 624 Spruce, blue 7.5 Fair 1 625 Spruce, blue 9.5 Fair 1 626 Spruce, blue 10.0 Fair 1 627 Spruce, blue 7.0 Fair 1 828 Spruce, blue 7.0 Fair 1 629 Spruce, blue 7.5 Fair 1 630 Spruce, blue 7.5 Fair 1 631 Spruce, blue 7.5 Fair 1 632 Spruce, blue 7.5 Fair 1 633 Spruce, blue 8.0 Fair 1 634 Spruce, blue 8.0 Fair 1 635 Elm, Siberian 8.0 Good 1 636 Spruce, blue 3.5 Fair 1 637 Spruce, blue 6.5 Fair 1 638 Spruce, white 4.5 Fair 1 639 Elm, Siberian 9.0 Good 1 640 Elm, Siberian 11.5 Good 1 642 Elm, Siberian 9.0 Good 1 646 Pine, jack 11.0 Fair 1 647 Pine, jack 13.5 Good 1 648 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 649 Elm, Siberian 10.0 Fair 1 650 Pine, jack 13.0 Good 1 651 Pine, jack 6.0 Fair 1 652 Pine, jack 12.0 Fair 1 653 Boxelder 11.0 Fair 1 654 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 655 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 657 Aspen 10.0 Good 1 658 Aspen 10.0 Good 1 659 Aspen 12.0 Good 1 660 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 661 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 662 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 663 Aspen 9.5 Good 1 664 Aspen 7.0 Good 1 665 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 686 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 687 Aspen 9.5 Fair 1 688 Boxelder 8.0 Good 1 689 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 690 Aspen 6.0 Fair 1 691 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 692 Aspen 9.5 Good 1 693 Aspen 8.5 Good 1 694 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 695 Aspen 6.5 Fair 1 696 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 697 Aspen 8.5 Good 1 698 Aspen 10.0 Good 1 B99 Aspen 10.0 Good 1 700 Aspen 9.5 Good 1 701 Pine, jack 11.0 Good 1 702 Pine, jack 12.5 Good 1 703 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 704 Pine, jack 8.5 Good 1 705 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 706 Pine, jack 8.5 Good 1 707 Aspen 17.0 Fair 1 708 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 709 Pine, jack 10.0 Good 1 710 Pine, jack 12.0 Fair 1 711 Pine, jack 9.5 Good 1 712 Pine, jack 9.0 Fair 1 713 Pine, jack 5.0 Fair 1 714 Pine, jack 10.5 Fair 1 715 Pine, jack 9.0 Good 1 716 Pine, jack 7.5 Fair 1 717 Pine, jack 11.0 Good 1 718 Pine, jack 6.5 Fair 1 719 Pine, jack 6.5 Good 1 720 Pine, jack 14.0 Good 1 857 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 858 Aspen 6.5 Good 1 901 Boxelder 8.0 Fair 1 902 Boxelder 10.0 Fair 1 903 Pine, white 11.0 Good 1 904 Pine, jack 9.5 Good 1 905 Pine, jack 13.5 Good 1 906 Boxelder 17.0 Fair 1 907 Pine, jack 13.0 Good 1 908 Pine, jack 7.5 Good 1 913 Pine, jack 13.5 Good 1 914 Pine, jack 11.0 Good 1 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 COLBERG�TEWS landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota 6� 044 -1 --ti_ License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 F_ Description PUD Submittal PUD Resubmittal PUD Resubmittal DID SET Revisions Date Num 10/08/2018 01/14/2019 03/11/2019 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 10/04/2019 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: Check: North Tree Preservation Plan Scale: 1" - 50' SMH RIM-900.78 r 001 0 \ 1 2 3 4 5 \ I I I I I I I I ,, \ 254' FENCE 114' NO FENCE I I 585' FENCE I NO FENCE I FENCE FALLS \ BEGINNING OF PRIVACY FENCE 0.1± SOUTH _ 6' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCE OPENING IN 6' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SEE DETAIL 1��� ��� PRIVACYFENCE�"c"M11Rs�T��������������������`, ��SEEDETAIL �o1±�NOR� y + 0 ♦ \ FOR WETLAND z.1t NORTH —� I I ICLX X X s II o s. ♦ VAS /- U-7�— � 1 ♦ \ V /;. // EXISTING �� A ♦ \- \ ll. I_ /l l WETLAND 7/I / I I 1 1 IF' STORMWATER BERM AND BUFFER ♦ �,aadi �,id,, DRY BASIN l l 11� ��� 1 1 \ 1 ♦ I III I 1 NW GREENSPACE // I / 1 I 1 PLANTINGS SEE L2.6 I SEE L2.6 y e d ° d � a o� o to 0, 130' SIGHT TRIANGLE 1 o EAST TOWNHOMES SEE L2.8 �� �� ♦ V A �� / ,�� 11 1 � o 1 1\` \ 0 /0_ _ NE GREENSPACE 1 \ \ \ \ I / 1 ♦\\ �� \ // /h 0 \� • SEE L2.6 1 _ I — — I 1 ♦ ��� /, _ _ _,�� i 1 1 =_ _--�� i I� \ I �- —♦ • - - I Soh � -1-- �� � \, MONUMENT SIGN /OODRIDGE LANE ♦ y , LAKES, MN 55014 _ / , ::R� , /y , _ �\� �, i �� 1 SEE ARCH. ♦ /ail ,�C � — 6 %'/q1p���%, i,� 3 ' ,��r"��d11,G,� � _ I� hl,��' `�/ ,� 1 ♦ �\dd�/�� oip � \' �/'lil��\ � � � ` \ • 1 of ��� • / • \\ �I�1\\\ / I T c w w w ♦ WEST \ _— _�■o��-Sd 1 -- _ ♦ � — — - — - — _ = 30' SIGHT TRIANGLE � — \ \ TOWNHOMES .I —_ — , to- 9p6 \ ♦�VJ' \ ♦ SEE L2.9 ♦ � - _ - d1----89543 - ,�, \ - / — / • �•. / 7 / \ 223 WOODRIDGE LANE / / ♦ ° \ldilj,� / 11l 1111 �� /// / LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ♦ % �• _ / // //// / / I / ? �� v - I � / / ♦ 0 \ � � SAS / // /O 229 WOODRIDGE LANE \ / ; _\� yg1�6/, A v v V' • /I1� LINO LAKES, MN 55014 04 �' ♦ \ � � \ l � � -I _ 'i�^ SW POND + i - • -� � ,. �� � I O _ I I GREENSPACE ''►r ♦ \ �� — ; SEE L2.7 / / ® I j• ♦ 906 o 0 _ : /II —; _ , , STORMWATER _ 231 WOODRIDGE LANE i� A yy l o o �/ bt"uiG' � �� � � l 1 � � 1D / of LINOLAKEs,MN55o1a ♦ �� - \ �� - yPOND -SEE CIVL �- o� I — 907 - b ® o •I MAIN BUILDING NORTH i o \ /, A" V \ h o ♦ SEE L2.1 o \ \ ° A\\\\V \\\ 30'SIGHTTRIANGLE C\\ .a �� ♦ \V A\\°A y x \ /lll/l/llll / I� ��_ 11,Gi ---908 �o 233 WOODRIDGE LANE 0 ' LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \X ♦ � v • v� vvvvvill/l/llll - %/'����' �I,�; g I� �\ \ to r � �' ,yid, ;, • , 239 WOODRIDGE LANE ti�_ -- - - LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ♦ \\ • ��� J � 908 - / ♦ 2 l/ I ./ MATC INE °\ \ //° O — ♦ \ �v �'%r'►�r��` � � �v _ _ 8g��� I ���� — "TOWN CENTER COURTYARD 900 \ ♦ \z V - �g9 __/ ♦ _ 1 i,�,� _ _ 1 ♦ � �:\ � g0� ' I i \ ; _,,t�,�,,. 1 SEE L1.4+ L2.3 �,•� I I 906 241 WOODRIDGE LANE ♦ \ � 0�`I - A / / \�A1��� LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ♦ A �� 1 i \ / / /// li i ° 8' WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN FENCE y MAIN / D 245WOODRII SEE DETAIL \ - - BUILDING SOUTH LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ♦ \ ` SEE L2.2 rh p b ' / / ♦ � � • \`� � \ ail \ �' � ��` � �%f, I �� "I = _ I� i W 90 ♦ ■ d° 7111 • 30'SIGHTTRIANGLE �������k=�� 251 WOODRIDGE LANE o , \ \ \ LINO LAKES, MN 55014 O 90 1 i 904 CIP'W,ri V 1 905 / / / I 253 WOODRIDGE LANE ; - LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ♦ fix\ / \ L — — — /------ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- I I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT NOT IN CONTRACT �'_� o ''\ o I I 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 �aa '�timd o \ — — — — — — — — — X";� la — o o� O 255 ASH STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55126= 906 v I I I I i ;902 \ _ / 2 ` 100' SIGHT TRIANGLE \ \ ` —907 901 — Fo Fo — 0 F ? 0 — F FO �FOOH OH�FQ FQj-,— I I I II I II II J� I I I 100' SIGHT TRIANGLE I 1j I I w w / � / I / J I I ' W I w of L'I I W I w I I I III I W i J W I I I I�il I J ;!f 6 7 L1.0 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES 8 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. — — — 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. ALL CEDAR TO BE #2 OR BETTER WITH TIGHT KNOTS, NO HOLES, CHECKS, OR SPLITS. ALL FASTENERS TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS RING SHANK NAILS OR SCREWS. 1x6 NOM. CEDAR FLAT TOP PICKETS ALTERNATING SIDES NO DOG EARS 2x4 NOM. CEDAR RAIL TOP AND BOTTOM MIN. 8' 4x4 NOM. CEDAR POST GRADE 9" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING TYP. 8' O.C. VIEW OF SIDE FACING NEW CONSTRUCTION. FINISHED FACE W/0 POSTS VISIBLE TO FACE NORTH TOWARD EXISTING PROPERTIES. 2 6' orb' CEDAR SCREEN FENCE DETAIL Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1651 227 7773 COLBERGITEWS landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any &all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct super,C�44-- TV ---- vision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North Site Layout Plan SITE PLAN 1"=50' I 0 25 50 100 ill =50' L1.0 0 1 2 II 3 4 5 FENCE FALLS \ FENCE COR. FALLS �I I I 0.1± SOUTH _ \ ON PROP. LINE — I I I —FENCE FALLS I = FENCE COR. FALLS / 0 1 �I 2.1± NORTH 0.1± NORTH / / / _LANE / / A 55014 / / / / / / / )ODRIDGE LANE AKES, MN 55014 / / / B C E F / / / / / / / 221 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / / O / I / / / / / /\ / 223 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / O / / / / / o / / / 229 WOODRIDGE LANE / LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / / / y / o / / 0\ / / 231 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / O O / O / 2 � / 2 233 WOODRIDGE LANE / \ LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / 2 / / C, / 239 WOODRIDGE LANE \ti LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / f\ / / 241 WOODRIDGE LANE / LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / / / / / 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / / / / / / 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 r 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 I I 11, y4F / 1,M 255 ASH STREET " �I\ ST. PAUL, MN 55126 n. 7 8 L1.1 IRRIGATION PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L3.0 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. KEY AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED IRRIGATION NOTES _ 1. ALL SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION 2. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY HEADS OR ROTORS I `go li I MATCHLINE W— — — — — — — — — — O i \ W I W I I I w w I I � I � Q) � I �W I IOW � L e W w I W Iw I L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: e D—,) Check: North Irrigated Areas Plan IRRIGATED AREAS PLAN 1"=50' 2� 100 1"=50' r L 1 01 0 2 J/ C N MATCHLINE 3 4 61 6 E LAYOUT PLAN - MAIN BUILDING NORTH 0 10 20 4 1"=20' ill =20' F J 7 L1.1 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES 8 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota " -- , ". 44 -. T, --- , License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DD SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North Main Building North Layout Plan r Scale: 1" - 20' 1m2 7 8 AI E F L1.0 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. I !I LAYOUT PLAN - MAIN BUILDING SOUTH 0 10 20 4 ill =20' ill =20' M, Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.conn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota � �T License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description PUD Submittal PUD Resubmittal PUD Resubmittal DID SET CD CHECK SET CD QAQC CHECK SET Date Num 10/08/2018 01/14/2019 03/11/2019 06/28/2019 08/30/2019 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North Main Building South Layout Plan r Scale: 1" - 20' 1m3 0 A B 11 1 2 3 4 5 (::iLAYOUT PLAN -TOWN CENTER COURTYARD 001 3'-4" 1'-8" 1-3/8" STL ANGLE BRACKET LIP GAS FIRE UNIT - HPC ROUND BOWL FOR INSERT EA SIDE. INSERT KIT MODEL PENTA37E1-HI/LO. PROVIDE NATURAL GAS CONNECTION AND EMERGENCY SHUTOFF VALVE. VERIFY AND INSURE UNIT VALVE BOX IS 3" STONE CAP TO MATCH INSTALLED ABOVE GRADE WITH WALL STONE PROPER DRAINAGE. PROVIDE PROPER VERIFY HEIGHT TO INSURE ELECTRICAL AND FLEXIBLE GAS FEED a GAS FIRE INSERT UNIT E PROPERLY RATED FOR UNIT PER a a u' VALVE BOX IS INSTALLED MANUFACTURER SPECS. ° �' a- N -I00 ABOVE GRADE. DIMS GIVEN co "' z PER PRODUCT DETAIL 3" x 6" VENT EA. SIDE W/ SS CUSTOM �I00 � GRATE TBD BY LA. RECESS GRATE 1/2" @❑ a IT o SHEET. VERIFY W/ U- MANUFACTURER. INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT OPENINGS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY noa ° o�` o ° a ° MINIMUM SIZE PER MANUFACTURER a �� SPECIFICATIONq. a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a —III IIIIIIIII—III— a CULTURED STONE VENEER TO MATCH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III ARCHITECTURAL VENEER I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII j IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III a a PROVIDE BRICK LEDGE FOR CULTURED 2" MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN UNIT AND III a 4 STONE VENEER TO MATCH SITE WALLS GRADE FOR VENTILATION AND DRAINAGE III I II I II I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III ° ° a POURED CONC. OR CMU WALLS W/ 2" MIN. DRAIN LINE FOR ° ° III —III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III ° ° FILLED CORE. FOR POURED CONC. FIRE PIT TO DAYLIGHT III —III III —III I II I @ O.C. BOTH WALLS #4 REBAR 12" IIIIII—III IIIIIIIIIII—III a a WAYS FREE DRAINING FILL a a a IIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III a IIIIIIIIIIIIIII—III a MIN. 6" COMPACTED SUBGRADE FOOTINGS TO FROST a a I II I II I II I II I II I I —III DEPTH AS REQ'D ,yvIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII a v vv�vZA a IIII��IIII---IIIIIMIIIII��III� 1'-8" 6 7 8 L1.0 LAYOUT PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L200 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 1 4 : 16 :, \I ""^^T" FINISH STONE CAP TO MATCH TURAL WALL CAPS. CAULK JOINTS. STONE VENEER TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL VENEER MSV-1 EXPANSION JOINT WHERE WALL ABUTS CONCRETE PLAZA OR OTHER FIXED OBJECTS PROVIDE BRICK LEDGE FOR CULTURED STONE VENEER TO MATCH SITE WALLS POURED CONC. OR CMU BLOCK W/ FILLED CORES. FOR POURED CONC. WALLS #4 REBAR @ 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS POURED CONC. FOOTING #4 REBAR @ 12" O.C. 6" MIN. COMPACTED FREE DRAINING GRAVEL AROUND WALL ALL SIDES. Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: Check: North Town Center Courtyard Layout Plan 2 GAS FIREPIT WITH ELECTRONIC IGNITION 1 -1-0 3 COURTYARD SEAT WALL 1 -1-0 Scale: 1/8" - 1'-0" L1.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 0 ` I I ` I I \ I I � I I X X X X - �,/ i� �� / w WWWWWWWWWWWW �\ SEE L2.6FOR NW GREENSPACE o /A,: PLANTINGS Q lb W W o W SEE1-2.6FOR a" 0 COMMUNITY GARDEN I� AREA PLANTING 0� IDGE LANE Ili// e O \,Illd S, MN 55014 096 —895 / y \ 1 7? 223 WOODRIDGE LANE / \ • ' LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / o / / I SEE L2.5 FOR SW POND z SEE L2.8 & L2.9 FOR TOWNHOME AREA PLANTINGS ° 1 II.II I—F I II / AND GREENSPACE / / o \ W W W W W . �W s AREA PLANTINGS / \ SEE L2.8 & L2.9 FOR so� TOWNHOME AREA s ° / PLANTINGS / W 229 WOODRIDGE LANE / W LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / \ W \ 04 � W Ib / �W 231 WOODRIDGE LANE ►IiI "El / ■11�5■■Rill■ LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / / �J ��� g01 L2: � , LEVARD / \W 90 8 O �o 233 WOODRIDGE LANE / \\ = _ c 1 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \ W \\ ,Ilrl/illl`��� 17 / WW 239 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 2 W W Og' O / o- / / -SEE L2.7 FORSW�!�"" O _ GREENSPACE AREA ,,q _ ..PLANTINGS 9os 906 �, 1 241 WOODRIDGE LANE / / 0 3 SEE L2.7 FOR SW ' LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / - ° GREENSPACE AREA � % 1� ° PLANTINGS ° d W WWW ° 245 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 / W —t 901 / .. \ .. m Oi oil •00� \�\�Ilb//� I I w / / f _ / Ilia W - / O 907 do d �� d ° O O O / �10 �AY�1/r��\AIl�j� /�I r� 0 AF STREET'B' STREET'B' 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 s 0 908 "0a W 905 w I I FUTURE COMMERCIAL �! 253 WOODRIDGE LANE \'< \ I DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN 55014 1 it W W d 4G% 4. 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 'd �I�i,% 1 255 ASH STREET �I ST. PAUL, MN 55126 (5-4 I Irl ar '_ y I a" zpan --- — — — — — r — — — — — m I ' I ' I I I I I J WL---- _ 907 Ci g r+cv, c W arv£ ° ° d ;am SEE L2.6 FOR N.E. - W GREENSPACE AREA _ 00 PLANTINGS 'rnd ZI J W O I J _ I W - \dlll ' � �•� T 911 I O JI � W ° y". A O F IIII,�� 1.,. Z, ---------- �— o 1 J W ° I I WI w �I I� I • SEE L2.1 & L2.2 ° FOR MAIN BUILDING PLANTINGS o tc r �o a Qa C 0 0 I z� O.,I, 0 1 I o� I II I W I ' SEE L2.3 FOR COURTYARD PLANTINGS ,m O I I Zw w SEE L2.1 & L2.2 I` FOR MAIN BUILDING PLANTINGS I' I ` L------------ J ------- - - J-- / I w \ \ ( I\ I I \ I � I V— — — — ---------- 0 `\ I Ile -- -- -- — o � o cl:) I I QS U I \ 90 �� I \ 6 X • y Z W a� 902a. W W a> I 901 HIGHWAY / & N L— N.o.w. PLAT No. ae— — — CC�R --8 Izs - --- — �w,.er,�y uaKree aaae.aTI Y) I I w w 7 L2.0 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.0 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII AF 20 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER MAPLE 'AUTUMN GLEN' ESPRESSO GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS GD 7 KENTUCKY 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER 'ESPRESSO - JFS' COFFEETREE QB 8 SWAMP WHITE QUERCUS BICOLOR 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER OAK PIN QE 19 NORTHERN QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER ALL BOULEVARD AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. BOULEVARD TREE CALCULATIONS STREET'/' LF FRONTAGE (WEST SIDE) 1,338 LF STREET'A' BLVD. TREES REQUIRED (WEST SIDE) 1,338/70 = 19 STREET'A' BLVD. TREES PROVIDED (WEST SIDE) 22 STREET'/'LF FRONTAGE (EAST SIDE) 1,232 LF STREET'/'BLVD. TREES REQUIRED (EAST SIDE) 1,232/70 = 18 STREET'A' BLVD. TREES PROVIDED (EAST SIDE) 19 STREET'B' LF FRONTAGE (NORTH SIDE) 401 LF STREET'B' BLVD. TREES REQUIRED (NORTH SIDE) 401/70 = 6 STREET'B' BLVD. TREES PROVIDED (NORTH SIDE) 7 STREET'B' LF FRONTAGE (SOUTH SIDE) 388 LF STREET'B' BLVD. TREES REQUIRED (SOUTH SIDE) 388/70 = 6 STREET'B' BLVD. TREES PROVIDED (SOUTH SIDE) 6 COTTAGE HOME BLVD. STREET FRONTAGE (PRIVATE ROAD) 1869 COTTAGE HOME BLVD. TREES REQUIRED 27 COTTAGE HOME BLVD TREES PROVIDED 35 L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: Check: North Boulevard Tree Planting Plan Scale: 1" - 50' 2mO BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING PLAN ill =50' I 25 50 100 ill =50' r 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 ° o \ \q/ 895 o (O o O 3 o SI t� „5(trr° _ ° D/ I 0 o n r0 SODS SOD VL GD 1 1 3 - CP 10 SO TO / 6 HA kF 2 18 = :a S11 4 6 3 7 C/ 9 2JI MA2 \ 1 s 3 0 o� t a >v SOD 7 0 O /JS / 19 3 4F 5H \t, OD � SEE L2.0 FOR BOULEVARD HE I JV2 11 TREE PLANTINGS NF 110 111 SA 4 / GT GT PA =` 7 ,.; 11,,.. PA 12 / SH - _ 5 G�� \ SOD 4 1 �,,, CA \G_AFSA 908 PA,, _ HA O TM E CA 5 34 3 / DL CA 16 18 iv Q / 3PG / 1 �� �� SOD / E BP 1 5 TO / GD JS / 1 SEEDED 5 1 - NF o / TURF = 3 CA SOD 3 / SR vII1/ 1 5 = is PO MATC IN 4 4 O I ° SEE L2.2 FOR SOUTH MAIN • BUILDING PLANTINGS \ PARKING AREA AF � 1 MA 907 17 / F JV2 MAIN BUILDING NORTH PLANTING PLAN 1"=20' PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.1 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII AF 16 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER MAPLE 'AUTUMN GLEN' WHITESPIRE BETULA PLATYPHYLLA BP 8 2.5" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER BIRCH 'WHITESPIRE' ESPRESSO GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS GD 2 KENTUCKY 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER 'ESPRESSO - JFS' COFFEETREE SKYLINE GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT g 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER HONEYLOCUST VAR INERMIS'SKYCOLE' EASTERN RED JV g JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 6' B+B CEDAR ADA MA g MALUS 'ADAMS' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE SPRING SNOW MA2 3 MALUS'SPRING SNOW' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE BLACK HILLS PICEA GLAUCA VAR. PG 6 6' B+B SPRUCE DENSATA QE 1 PIN QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER OAKNORTHERN IVORY SILK SYRINGA RETICULATA SR 7 2" B+B TREE FORM TREE LILAC 'IVORY SILK' SHRUBS IROQUOIS ARONIA MELANOCARPA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. AM 36 BEAUTY #5 CONT 'MORTON' TYP. CHOKEBERRY ARCTIC FIRE CORNUS STOLONIFERA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CS 6 #5 CONT DOGWOOD 'FARROW' TYP. DWARF BUSH SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. DL 74 DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT HONEYSUCKLE . TYP. LITTLE MOSES EUONYMUS ALATUS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. EA 12 #5 CONT. BURNING BUSH 'ODOM' TYP. HYDRANGEA ANNABELLE SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HA 115 ARBORESCENS #5 CONT HYDRANGEA TYP. ANNABELLE SEA GREEN JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS JC 26 #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. JUNIPER 'SEA GREEN' ARCADIA JUNIPERUS SABINA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS 50 #5 CONT JUNIPER 'ARCADIA' TYP. JUNIPERUS BLUE ARROW SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS2 7 SCOPULORUM'BLUE #20 CONT JUNIPER TYP. ARROW' GREY OWL JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JV2 41 #5 CONT JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' TYP. PHYSOCARPUS LITTLE DEVIL SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. PO 25 LIFOLIUS'DONNA #5 CONT. NINEBARK TYP. MAY GRO LOW RHUS AROMATICA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. RA 5 #5 CONT. SUMAC 'GRO-LOW' TYP. 907 TM 3 7 HA 16 5 Js2 MAIN BUILDING 6 7 7 E f » �8 �o o O I B I /S�IIE/1 E L 2.0 FOR BOUL EVARD TREE PLANTINGS S ED 7 HE6 X /II 01 6 3 S ��E9� E�l� cD��E, D 01 TURF MA2 DED o T I � II II 1 I L_L� I II II I I � I I I I � I to J wl O SH 6 II 7 7 10 I I TO 4 1_ � I NF 6 - SEEDED �URF HA 5 T4 JS 5 MA2 1 _ PG 1 I ° SEE L2.3 FOR COURTYARD PLANTINGS TIGER EYES RHUS TYPHINA RT 5 #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. SUMAC 'BAILTIGER' ASH LEAF SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SS 12 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA #5 CONT SPIREA TYP. GOLDFLAME SPIREAEA X BUMALDA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SB 23 #5 CONT. SPIREA 'GOLDFLAME' TYP. TAXUS X MEDIA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TM 29 TAUNTON YEW #5 CONT. TAUNTONII TYP. MR. BOWLING THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TO 32 BALL #5 CONT 'BOBAZAM' TYP. ARBORVITAE GOLDEN GLOBE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. T02 13 #5 CONT ARBORVITAE 'GOLDEN GLOBE' TYP. MOHICAN VIBURNUM LANTANA VL 2 #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. VIBURNUM 'MOHICAN' PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS CA 127 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL 1 GAL -- GRASS FOERSTER' POWWOW WILD ECHINACEA PURPUREA EP 18 BERRY 1 GAL -- 'POWWOW WILD BERRY' CONEFLOWER STELLA HEM EROCALLIS 'STELLA HE 32 SUPREME 1 GAL -- SUPREME' DAYLILY GOLDEN HAKONECHLOA MACRA HM 19 JAPANESE 1 GAL -- 'AUREOLA' FOREST GRASS I I 0 I� w 1 w C I wl J w I wl I wl SEEDED TURF w J w1 I I w J w �I I w1 II w JIw II I w w 11 SEEDED TURF w 'I wl I I I w1 I I I w MAT HLINE w I II I 0 10 20 40 1"=20' 7 , L2.1 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. TOTAL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+L2.2 COMBINED) MAIN BUILDING FOUNDATION- FRONT AND STREET FACING 1,379 LF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 28 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 84 TREES PROVIDED: 30 LG + 17 MED + 8 SM 45 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 490 MED. x .67= 328 LG. TOTAL OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+L2.2 COMBINED) MAIN BUILDING OPEN SPACE 71,070 SF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 36 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 108 TREES PROVIDED: 42 LG + 12 MED 25 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 5 LG + 162 MED X .67= 114 LG. CANOPY COVERAGE CALCULATIONS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+2.2 COMBINED) MAIN PARKING LOT 42,956 SF CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED 17,182 SF ISLAND W/ 3 LARGE TREES 3,600 SF 7 LG ISLAND TREES 6,650 SF 5 LG. TREES WITHIN 7' 3,000 SF 9 MED. TREES WITHIN 7' 2,250 SF 8 LG. TREES WITHIN 7-12' 2,400 SF TOTAL CANOPY COVERAGE PROVIDED 17,900 SF L2.1 + L2.2 TURF / SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL TURF AREA FOR MAIN BUILDING (N+S COMBINED, INCL. BOULEVARDS): 100,558 SF TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR MAIN BUILDING (N+S COMBINED): - WALKER'S LOW NEPETA FAASSENII NF 21 1 GAL -- CATMINT 'WALKER'S LOW' PEROVSKIA LITTLE SPIRE PA 22 ATRIPLICIFOLIA'LITTLE 1 GAL -- RUSSIAN SAGE SPIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE PANICUM VIRGATUM PV 19 1 GAL -- SWITCHGRASS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' GOLDSTURM RG g RUDBECKIA'GOLDSTURM' 1 GAL -- RUDBECKIA AUTUMN FIRE SA 11 SEDUM X'AUTUMN FIRE' 1 GAL -- SEDUM PRAIRIE SPOROBOLUS SH 30 1 GAL -- DROPSEED HETEROLEPIS TURF AREAS TO BE SODDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. TURF AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: Check: North Main Building North Planting Plan Scale: V - 20' ■ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.2 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES AF 1 SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER MAPLE 'AUTUMN GLEN' AUTUMN AMELANCHIER X AG 7 BRILLIANCE GRAND IFLORA'AUTUMN 8' CLUMP CLUMP FORM SERVICEBERRY BRILLIANCE' THORNLESS CRETAEGUS CRUS GALLI CC 7 COCKSPUR 1.5" B+B TREE FORM VAR. INERMIS HAWTHORN ESPRESSO GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS GD 3 KENTUCKY 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER 'ESPRESSO - JFS' _ COFFEETREE SKYLINE GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT 3 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER HONEYLOCUST VAR INERMIS'SKYCOLE' EASTERN RED JV 3 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 6' B+B CEDAR MA 3 ADAMS MALUS'ADAMS' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE MA2 1 SPRING SNOW MALUS'SPRING SNOW' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE PG 9 BLACK HILLS PICEA GLAUCA VAR. 6, B+B SPRUCE DENSATA QE 5 NORTHERN PIN QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER SHRUBS IROQUOIS ARONIA MELANOCARPA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. AM 13 BEAUTY 'MORTON' #5 CONT TYP. CHOKEBERRY ARCTIC FIRE CORNUS STOLONIFERA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CS 28 DOGWOOD 'FARROW' #5 CONT TYP. DL 17 DWARF BUSH DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HONEYSUCKLE TYP. ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HA 7 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS #5 CONT TYP. ANNABELLE SEA GREEN JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS JC JUNIPER 'SEA GREEN' #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. ARCADIA JUNIPERUS SABINA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS 9 JUNIPER 'ARCADIA' #5 CONT TYP. GREY OWL JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JV2 5 JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' #5 CONT TYP. LITTLE DEVIL PHYSOCARPUS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. PO 4 OPULIFOLIUS'DONNA #5 CONT. NINEBARK TYP. MAY SS 2 ASH LEAF SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA #5 CONT SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SPIREA TYP. MR. BOWLING THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TO 21 BALL #5 CONT ARBORVITAE 'BOBAZAM' TYP. RUSHMORE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. T03 8 #20 CONT ARBORVITAE 'RUSHMORE' TYP. MOHICAN VIBURNUM LANTANA VL 1 VIBURNUM 'MOHICAN' #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS CA 7 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL 1 GAL -- GRASS FOERSTER' STELLA HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA HE 6 SUPREME 1 GAL -- SUPREME' DAYLILY WALKER'S LOW NEPETA FAASSENII NF 9 CATMINT 'WALKER'S LOW' 1 GAL -- PRAIRIE FIRE PANICUM VIRGATUM PV 12 SWITCHGRASS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' 1 GAL -- TURF AREAS TO BE SODDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. TURF AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. 7 L2.2 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 8 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. TOTAL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+L2.2 COMBINED) MAIN BUILDING FOUNDATION- FRONT AND STREET FACING 1,379 LF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 28 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 84 TREES PROVIDED: 30 LG + 17 MED + 8 SM 45 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 490 MED. x .67= 328 LG. TOTAL OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+L2.2 COMBINED) MAIN BUILDING OPEN SPACE 71,070 SF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 36 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 108 TREES PROVIDED: 42 LG + 12 MED 25 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 5 LG + 162 MED X .67= 114 LG. CANOPY COVERAGE CALCULATIONS - MAIN BUILDING (L2.1+2.2 COMBINED) MAIN PARKING LOT 42,956 SF CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED 17,182 SF ISLAND W/ 3 LARGE TREES 3,600 SF 7 LG ISLAND TREES 6,650 SF 5 LG. TREES WITHIN 7' 3,000 SF 9 MED. TREES WITHIN 7' 2,250 SF 8 LG. TREES WITHIN 7-12' 2,400 SF TOTAL CANOPY COVERAGE PROVIDED 17,900 SF L2.1 + L2.2 TURF / SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL TURF AREA FOR MAIN BUILDING (N+S COMBINED, INCL. BOULEVARDS): 100,558 SF TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR MAIN BUILDING (N+S COMBINED): - Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DD SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North Main Building South Planting Plan Scale: 1" - 20' L2.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 O I SEE L2.1 & L2.2 FOR I I MAIN BUILDING PLANTINGS \�1 I I TO ISE 6 3 SR El PV + o 1 3 5 SS 3 JS2 = = BU \I o CA is s / / 3 i� S M SE4 E4 5 1 I I I 5 3 �\ I O RG AF \\ 3 E1 3 2 I � O E1 I I E4 6 I I O SE3 SE3 2 I I 1 / I SEEDED E2 TURF I s � I 4 SE4 SE 9 v 2 S 9 SEEDED C 16 I 3 6 TURF C 4 E2 16 6 1 � I SE 7 11 AF2 O SE4 S 1 6 7 SE2 Ar I0 2 7 7 I TIM 1 ° 15 DL o 7 o I II ° I ° ° l I I� � I io I I � I it l \III I Fli - TOWN SQUARE COURTYARD PLANTING PLAN 1 " = 10' I E F 1 5 10 20�-1 7 8 L2.3 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.3 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES AF2 4 FIREFALL MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII 'AF #1' 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER AUTUMN AMELANCHIER X AG 1 BRILLIANCE GRAN DIFLORA'AUTUMN 8' CLUMP CLUMP FORM SERVICEBERRY BRILLIANCE' SUNBURST GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT 6 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER HONEYLOCUST VAR INERMIS'SUNCOLE' LEONARD MAGNOLIA X LOEBNERI #10 ML 1 MESSEL CLUMP FORM 'LEONARD MESSEL' CLUMP MAGNOLIA IVORY SILK SYRINGA RETICULATA SR 1 2" B+B TREE FORM TREE LILAC 'IVORY SILK' SHRUBS CHICAGOLAND SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. BU 4 GREEN BUXUS 'GLENCOE' #5 CONT. TYP. BOXWOOD DWARF BUSH SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. DL 7 DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT. HONEYSUCKLE TYP. LITTLE MOSES EUONYMUS ALATUS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. EA 7 #5 CONT. BURNING BUSH 'ODOM' TYP. HYDRANGEA ANNABELLE SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HA 13 ARBORESCENS #5 CONT HYDRANGEA TYP. ANNABELLE JUNIPERUS BLUE ARROW SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS2 6 SCOPULORUM'BLUE #20 CONT JUNIPER TYP. ARROW' SUMMER WINE PHYSOCARPUS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. P02 1 #5 CONT. NINEBARK OPULIFOLIUS'SEWARD' TYP. ASH LEAF SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SS 6 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA #5 CONT SPIREA TYP. TAXUS X MEDIA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TM 17 TAUNTON YEW #5 CONT. TAUNTONII TYP. MR. BOWLING THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TO 11 BALL #5 CONT 'BOBAZAM' TYP. ARBORVITAE PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS CA 24 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL 1 GAL -- GRASS FOERSTER' POWWOW WILD ECHINACEA PURPUREA EP 8 BERRY 1 GAL -- 'POWWOW WILD BERRY' CONEFLOWER PEROVSKIA LITTLE SPIRE PA 18 ATRIPLICIFOLIA'LITTLE 1 GAL -- RUSSIAN SAGE SPIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE PANICUM VIRGATUM PV 10 1 GAL -- SWITCHGRASS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' GOLDSTURM RG 2 RUDBECKIA'GOLDSTURM' 1 GAL -- RUDBECKIA FIREGLOW SEDUM SPURIUM SE1 27 1 GAL -- SEDUM TULDAGLUT LEMON BALL SEDUM RUPESTRE SE2 29 1 GAL -- SEDUM 'LEMON BALL' SUNSPARKLER SE3 39 FIRECRACKER SEDUM 'FIRECRACKER' 1 GAL -- SEDUM SUNSPARKLER SEDUM 'SUNSPARKLER SE4 41 LIME ZINGER 1 GAL -- LIME ZINGER' SEDUM TURF AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11 /2020 Drawn: Check: North Town Center Courtyard Planting Plan Scale: V - 10' 2m3 1 2 3 J I I A B C E A J 4 5 6 7 I I I L2.6 PLANTING PLAN NOTES - — -� —Fiv Iq?kJ 907 2 IIIA ylrr;,; � SEE L2.8 & L2.9 FOR FOR TOWNHOME AREA PLANTINGS a -71,6 1 �, SEE L2.8 & L2.9 FOR FOR TOWNHOME AREA PLANTINGS 0 o ° a - 0 o I AF Tr)7 SIR ° s = to GT , C0 TO \� 39 Ci 5 AF I 3 — 00 ��\III/� \ I I PG I /I I� 0 o T( 9 + � - C, 3 3 ---- - Q ril - 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.6 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII AF 5 MAPLE 'AUTUMN GLEN' 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER BN 12 RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA 8' CLUMP CLUMP FORM SKYLINE GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT 4 HONEYLOCUST VAR INERMIS'SKYCOLE' 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER JV 10 EASTERN RED JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 6' B+B CEDAR BLACK HILLS PICEA GLAUCA VAR. PG 8 SPRUCE DENSATA 6' B+B PRAIRIE STATESMAN PC 5 PINUS CEMBRA'HERMAN' 6' B+B STRAIGHT LEADER SWISS STONE PINE QB 8 SWAMP WHITE QUERCUS BICOLOR 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER OAK IVORY SILK SYRINGA RETICULATA SR 3 2" B+B TREE FORM TREE LILAC 'IVORY SILK' SHRUBS ARCTIC FIRE CORNUS STOLONIFERA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CS 18 DOGWOOD 'FARROW' #5 CONT TYP. ARCADIA JUNIPERUS SABINA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS 7 JUNIPER 'ARCADIA' #5 CONT TYP. COMMON WHITE SYRINGA VULGARIS VAR. SV 65 LILAC ALBA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN. EMERALD THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 6' O.C. TO 48 ARBORVITAE 'SMARAGD' #10 CONT. TYP. PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS CA 4 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL 1 GAL -- GRASS FOERSTER' PEROVSKIA LITTLE SPIRE PA 6 RUSSIAN SAGE ATRIPLICIFOLIA'LITTLE 1 GAL -- SPIRE' TURF AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX'TYPE A.' SEE SPECIFICATIONS. OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS - NE GREENSPACE NE GREENSPACE OPEN SPACE 23,000 SF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 12 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 36 TREES PROVIDED: 12 LARGE 12 LIS. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 48 LARGE 48 LG. OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS - NW GREENSPACE OPEN SPACE 54,073 SF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 27 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 80 TREES PROVIDED: 10 PRESERVED + 22 LG. 31 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 80 LG. L2.6TURF /SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL TURF AREA FOR NW GREENSPACE: TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR NW GREENSPACE: TOTAL TURF AREA FOR NE GREENSPACE: TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR NE GREENSPACE: 1,450 SF 40,340 SF 21,590 SF 0 SF L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.conn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota � �T License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description PUD Submittal PUD Resubmittal PUD Resubmittal DID SET CD CHECK SET CD QAQC CHECK SET Date Num 10/08/2018 01/14/2019 03/11/2019 06/28/2019 08/30/2019 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North NE Greenspace & Community Garden Area Planting Plans Scale: SEE DRAWING 2m6 2 NW GREENSPACE PLANTING PLAN 0 10 20 4 1"=20' ill =20' I I I I I r 0 1 I% \� MATCHLINE O PG 10 251 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 SEE L2.0 FOR BOULEVARD TREE PLANTINGS 8' HT. FENCE / \ SEE L1.0 III \ ��� / \��� \ I \ 8' HT. SPRUCE — \ TO O 253 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014\III% \\ ill\ li// \ O\ \ — INSERT DRAWING'A' --- \III/,� ----- IT — — — — ,\t1ib t Ili/,i 0 255 WOODRIDGE LANE LINO LAKES MN 55014 rl1\ I� -� 11 IT /,Pll, 255 ASH STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55126 r941-� o --------Par el 19 ANOKA G0. HIGHWAY R.O.W. PLAT NO. 48— o0 — — — — — — — — — SW POND & GREENSPACE PLANTING PLAN 1"=20' I I 3 4 5 6 7 8 I L L2.7 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.7 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES FREEMAN ACER X FREEMANII AF 4 MAPLE 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 3" B+B BP 3 PAPER BIRCH BETULA PAPYRIFERA 3" B+B THORNLESS CRETAEGUS CRUS GALLI CC 3 HAWTHORN VAR. INERMIS 1.5„ B+B JV 12 EASTERN RED JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 6' B+B CEDAR BLACK HILLS PG 11 PICEA GLAUCA'DENSATA' 8' B+B SPRUCE PT 9 QUAKING ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2" B+B QA 3 WHITE OAK QUERCUS ALBA 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER SHRUBS ISANTI SPACING PER PLAN, 6' O.C. CS 66 CORNUS SERICEA'ISANTI' #5 CONT DOGWOOD TYP. RG 58 SMOOTH SUMAC RHUS GLABRA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 6' O.C. TYP. TO 106 WHITE CEDAR THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 6' HT. SPACING PER PLAN, 10' O.C. OFFSET ROWS L2.7TURF /SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL TURF AREA FOR SW GREENSPACE: TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR SW GREENSPACE: 4,408 SF 35,015 SF TURF AREAS TO BE SEEDED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRASS SEED MIX. AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX'TYPE A.' SEE SPECIFICATIONS. AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX'TYPE B.' SEE SPECIFICATIONS. OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS - SW GREENSPACE OPEN SPACE 84,699 SF TREES REQUIRED (LARGE) 43 SHRUBS REQUIRED (LARGE) 127 TREES PROVIDED: 187 LG (PRESERVED) + 15 LG 202 LG. SHRUBS PROVIDED: 230 LIS. NOTES: ACCESS ROUTE TO POND OVERFLOW STRUCTURE WILL BE COORDINATED WITH CIVIL AND ADEQUATE SPACE WILL BE PROVIDED IN PLANTING PLAN. SEE CIVIL FOR ACCESS ROUTE. r Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota �44--� License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North SW Pond and Greenspace Planting Plan Scale: SEE DRAWING 2m7 8 E A 11 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L2.5 PLANTING PLAN NOTES al � a JS HA 1 3 O OHO o 0 Oo O o i O�. 895 a CA r02 5 1 DL 3 PV 14 AG 1 CS 3 X III/// o NT T � G EAST TOWNHOMES PLANTING PLAN 1"=20' i Q as a O SH 5 907 II MA2 to -, PV 5CA 12 T02 3 I - + JV2 C1 5 HA 1 ",/"\���fii,, c O JS d fiii GD � d d Go 0 SR 0 I f SEE L2.6 FOR N.E. � � PC - 1 ° GREENSPACE AREA PLANTINGS 1 i ETM] CA on TM 5 �dld HA 1 vtaprl;'r 0 10 HA „ 3 L3 / I I GD 2 ISI L BP SC 1 AM 12 3 O I` 0 TT TT 5 .3 .— '/ I \ z1i/l6N%'Ilp I . ° o o 4T �I�OI o Px o 90 o 0 , o 9 o 10 20 � 41 1"=20' CANOPY COVERAGE CALCULATIONS NORTH PARKING SPACES 1,399 SF CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED 560 SF 2 LG TREES WITHIN 7' 1,200 SF TOTAL CANOPY COVERAGE PROVIDED 1,200 SF BOULEVARD TREES EAST TOWNHOME STREET FRONTAGE 816 LF (INCL. CUL-DE-SAC) BOULEVARD TREES REQUIRED 12 BOULEVARD TREES PROVIDED 14 (INCL. NE GREENSPACE) 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.5 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII AF 4 3" B+B MAPLE 'SIENNA' AUTUMN AMELANCHIER X AG 3 BRILLIANCE GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN 6' B+B CLUMP FORM SERVICEBERRY BRILLANCE' BP 2 WHITESPIRE BETULA PLATYPHYLLA 2.5" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER BIRCH 'WHITESPIRE' THORNLESS CC 2 COCKSPUR CRETAEGUS CRUS GALLI 1.5" B+B TREE FORM HAWTHORN VAR. INERMIS ESPRESSO GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS GD 6 KENTUCKY 'ESPRESSO - JFS' 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER COFFEETREE SKYLINE GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT 3 3„ B+B HONEYLOCUST 'SKYCOLE' FASTER RED JV _ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 8' HT CEDAR MA2 3 SPRING SNOW MALUS'SPRING SNOW' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE CHALET SWISS PC 3 STONE PINE PINUS CEMBRA'CHALET 6' B+B BLACK HILLS PICEA GLAUCA VAR. PG 3 SPRUCE DENSATA 6' B+B PR 8 RED PINE PINUS RESINOSA 6' B+B QA 5 WHITE OAK QUERCUS ALBA 3" B+B QB SWAMP WHITE QUERCUS BICOLOR 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER OAK SR 1 IVORY SILK SYRINGA RETICULATA 2" B+B TREE FORM TREE LILAC 'IVORY SILK' SHRUBS IROQUOIS AM 6 BEAUTY ARONIA MELANOCARPA #5 CONT SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CHOKEBERRY 'MORTON' TYP. ARCTIC FIRE CORNUS STOLONIFERA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CS 4 DOGWOOD 'FARROW' #5 CONT TYP. DL 3 DWARF BUSH DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HONEYSUCKLE TYP. HA 8 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS TYP. ARCADIA JUNIPERUS SABINA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JS 7 #5 CONT JUNIPER 'ARCADIA' TYP. GREY OWL JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JV2 4 JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' #5 CONT. TYP. ASH LEAF SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SS 3 SPIREA SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA #5 CONT TYP. TM 7 TAUNTON YEW TAXUS MEDIA'TAUNTONII' #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TYP. MR. BOWLING THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TO 1 BALL #5 CONT ARBORVITAE 'BOBAZAM' TYP. GOLDEN GLOBE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. T02 7 #5 CONT ARBORVITAE 'GOLDEN GLOBE' TYP. TT 12 TECHNY THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 6' B+B ARBORVITAE 'TECHNY' PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS X CA 35 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN GRASS FOERSTER' PV 57 PRAIRIE FIRE PANICUM VIRGATUM #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN SWITCHGRASS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' BLUE HEAVEN SCHYZACHYRIUM SC 36 LITTLE #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN BLUESTEM SCOPARIUM 'MINNBLUE A' PRAIRIE SPOROBOLUS SH 22 DROPSEED HETEROLEPIS #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN L2.4 SOD / SEEDING NOTES: AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ TURF SEED - SEE SPECIFICATIONS w AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX "A" - SEE SPECIFICATIONS L2.4 TURF / SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL SEEDED TURF AREA FOR EAST TOWNHOMES: TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR EAST TOWNHOMES: 26,793 SF L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DD SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North East Townhomes Planting Plan Scale: 1" - 10' 2m8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2F PR i QA J1 QA PR I 1B 0 X — I0 _ — - /III\ ° - - - � - ° QB �� //_ - �� 9 5 + - �/ III \ ;. MA vIII/�� M SH ;FC7A 14 PV CS ' 12 ZG 12 3 TM TM CA 3 1 14 /; SR AM CA L v1 5 3 JS \ 3 HA 3 JS 1 �O 1 CA PC PV 1 TO T02 5 1 5 5 3 3 I 3 DL SS 4 O �H _ a - z C a ° \ I AM a Q' \ ----- a 3 ° ' I 4D to �� T02 % / 4D 16 I 1 ) 06 ; L O � SEE L2.6 FOR NW � � C � � � to � � \� GREENSPACE O CDQB GD / 1 (O PLANTING PLAN / o� a o \\ --- \ � \�,Ffol CC FMAI O 1 a 1 3 1 a _ - - GT 5� GT ° - ° \ CA SC � - 5 5 _ 0 TM HA 3 1 --------- - - 0 2 \ 9 _ / � a TM MA2 - a 9 PV HA 3 � 14 �°. PV JS 5 AG 3 QA O MA2 AM 12 _ ° 5 SC QA 3 i s�, TM �j�l��\C GT 12 2 :;t >,;, ' 1 8 JS DL 3VI 3 S JV - // \� 6 cc O O I \\ / ° 31 1 5 /Viv 0 S4 2 a ° a a j�/ I \\ OF I� Gp / a \ 90 _ -- . ° o 0 ° AM o ° ° T10 1 1 Q 'I a � SH J ` s 5 _ vIII// 3 a o SIC M 12 895 i \ I I \ SR ° �\ 1 - / j %\ a JS / /I I v3 �\ ° SH Y ° 5 JS 50 I� 3 / zi a TM \, o i o GD 1 CC � 1 _ 1 a = DL 1 o � ° I CC 3 SC o / o � \ 1 ° 6 12 ° \ \ A ' 2 O CA 3 \ � � MA2 QA � � � \ \ 5 HA 1 2 /4 5 IVO .001 Sc i AG / \ 1 Q A000, DL LLI to - y04 _ i� \ MA2 / I ° ° ° \ -- ° ° ° O ° \ ° :;1 ��yII — / i �\ j/III\ ��/ SEE L2.6 FOR SW ° ��� \ ° _ / - POND & 0011.01 \ %/ ���� J�/ GREENSPACE AREA O / \ (� / ° I // / PLANTINGS / OW \ e � / ° ° �Ile D 101 \ /i A 1 WEST TOWNHOMES PLANTING PLAN F ill= 20 10,,. 0 1� 4 1"=20' 7 8 L2.5 PLANTING PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHTING SELECTIONS AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING INFORMATION. 4. SEE SHEET L300 FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 6. SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BENCHMARKS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 7. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. 8. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. IF A NECESSARY DIMENSION IS NOT SHOWN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO RELATED WORK. 9. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ELECTRONIC FILES OR COORDINATES WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR SITE LAYOUT/STAKING. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH SITE CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. PLANT SCHEDULE - L2.5 TAG QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TREES SIENNA GLEN ACER X FREEMANII AF 4 MAPLE 'SIENNA' 3"B+B AUTUMN AMELANCHIER X AG 4 BRILLIANCE GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN 6' B+B CLUMP FORM SERVICEBERRY BRILLANCE' THORNLESS CRETAEGUS CRUS GALLI CC 5 COCKSPUR 1.5" B+B TREE FORM HAWTHORN VAR. INERMIS ESPRESSO GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS GD 10 KENTUCKY 'ESPRESSO - JFS' 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER COFFEETREE SKYLINE GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS GT 11 3„ B+B HONEYLOCUST 'SKYCOLE' EASTER RED JV 10 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 8' HT CEDAR ADAMS MA 4 MALUS 'ADAMS' 1.5" B+B CRABAPPLE SPRING SNOW MA2 8 MALUS'SPRING SNOW' 1.5" B+B TREE FORM CRABAPPLE PC 2 CHALET SWISS PINUS CEMBRA'CHALET' 6' B+B STONE PINE PR 4 RED PINE PINUS RESINOSA 6' B+B QA 13 WHITE OAK QUERCUS ALBA 3" B+B QB 4 SWAMP WHITE QUERCUS BICOLOR 3" B+B STRAIGHT LEADER OAK IVORY SILK SYRINGA RETICULATA SR 3 TREE LILAC 'IVORY SILK' 2" B+B TREE FORM SHRUBS IROQUOIS ARONIA MELANOCARPA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. AM 10 BEAUTY #5 CONT CHOKEBERRY 'MORTON' TYP. ARCTIC FIRE CORNUS STOLONIFERA SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. CS 12 DOGWOOD 'FARROW' #5 CONT TYP. DL 15 DWARF BUSH DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HONEYSUCKLE TYP. HA 6 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS TYP. JS 19 ARCADIA JUNIPERUS SABINA #5 CONT SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. JUNIPER 'ARCADIA' TYP. ASH LEAF SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. SS 3 SPIREA SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA #5 CONT TYP. TM 12 TAUNTON YEW TAXUS MEDIA'TAUNTONII' #5 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TYP. MR. BOWLING THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. TO 2 BALL #5 CONT ARBORVITAE 'BOBAZAM' TYP. GOLDEN GLOBE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SPACING PER PLAN, 4' O.C. T02 5 ARBORVITAE 'GOLDEN GLOBE' #5 CONT TYP. PERENNIALS KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS X CA 48 FEATHER REED ACUTIFLORA'KARL #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN GRASS FOERSTER' PV 36 PRAIRIE FIRE PANICUM VIRGATUM #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN SWITCHGRASS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' BLUE HEAVEN SCHYZACHYRIUM SC 86 LITTLE SCOPARIUM WINNBLUE A' #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN BLUESTEM PRAIRIE SPOROBOLUS SH 47 DROPSEED HETEROLEPIS #1 CONT. SPACING PER PLAN L2.5 TURF / SEEDING NOTES: TOTAL SEEDED TURF AREA FOR WEST TOWNHOMES: 48,378 SF TOTAL NATIVE SEEDED AREA FOR WEST TOWNHOMES: 20,190 SF AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ TURF SEED - SEE SPECIFICATIONS w AREAS TO BE SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX "A" - SEE SPECIFICATIONS CANOPY COVERAGE CALCULATIONS WEST TOWNHOME PARKING SPACES 929 SF CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED 372 SF 1 LG TREES WITHIN 7' 600 SF TOTAL CANOPY COVERAGE PROVIDED 600 SF BOULEVARD TREES WEST TOWNHOMES STREET FRONTAGE 1,011 LF BOULEVARD TREES REQUIRED 15 TREES BOULEVARD TREES PROVIDED 20 L Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All Intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota �44-- Tt-, License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North West Town homes Planting Plan Scale: V - 10' 2m9 I I I I I I I I IF 2 3 4 E.7 6 PLANTING NOTES 7 8 A NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE WITH PIN THE ROOT FLARE OF EACH TREE PRIOR TO PLACING TREE IN PLANTING PIT. (THE FLARE IS WHERE THE FIRST HORIZONTAL ROOT COMES OUT FROM THE TREE). THE PLANTING DEPTH OF EACH TREE WILL BE INSPECTED. ANY TREE PLANTED TOO DEEPLY OR WITH FLARE BURIED WILL BE REJECTED. REMOVE SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE (SOMETIMES AS MUCH AS HALF THE ROOTBALL). SET TREE IN PIT SO THAT FLARE IS ONE-TWO INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. IN ALL AREAS WITH HEAVY CLAY OR POORLY DRAINED SOILS (MOTTLING), CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO POSSIBLY RELOCATE TREE OR TO CONFIRM ELEVATED ROOTBALL. IN HEAVY SOILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET THE FLARE OF THE TREE 2"-3" ABOVE GRADE. MN AFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT DEADWOOD AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER. B C E F STAKES AND GUY WIRES MANDATORY ONLY FOR B&B TREES WITH 4" CALIPER OR GREATER AND ALL BARE ROOT TREES OR AS NOTED FLARE, SEE NOTE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. PLANTING HOLE TO BE 2' LARGER THAN ROOTBALL. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE STAKING: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - 4" DEPTH FOR 5 DIAMETER AROUND TREE. PULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. MIX THOROUGHLY. SEE SPEC. AFTER SETTING ROOT BALL IN PIT, BACKFILL TO WITHIN 12" OF TOP OF ROOTBALL AND WATER. CUT AND REMOVE TO BACKFILL LINE ALL TWINE, WIRE AND/OR BURLAP. BACKFILL UNTIL PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN. PULL EXCESS SOIL OFF THE TOP OF BRANCH ROOT SYSTEMS. IF SOIL IN ROOT BALL IS THE CONSISTENCY OF OATMEAL DUE TO EXCESSIVE HANDLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THE TREE. GUY ASSEMBLY: 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRIP- (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES OR SIGN POSTS @ 120 DEG. O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONALkSTAKl'NG BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURAION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. COORDINATE STAKINGTO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LINES AM AND STAKES. TYP. TREE PLANTING DETAIL 4 TYP. TREE PLANTING IN PARKING ISLAND 1/4" = 1'-0" TURF LAWN. TOP OF EDGING TO BE MAX. 1/2" ABOVE FINISHED MATERIAL PERMALOC CLEANLINE 4" X 3/16" ALUMINUM EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIN. (3) 12" STAKES PER 8' SECTION, (5) PER 12' SECTION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. MILL FINISH. PLANTING BED, SEE PLAN. FINISH MULCH BELOW TOP OF EDGING COMPACT GRADES ADJACENT TO EDGING TO PREVENT SETTLING. )NS SOD MAT TOP OF CURB 2 a SPACING SEE PLAN PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TO PREVENT ROTTING 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH FINISH GRADE - PLACE PLANT TO BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AS IN PRIOR GROWING CONDITION PLANTING SOILS PER SPECIFICATIONS. INCORPORATE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER & MIX THOROUGHLY AS REQUIRED. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING UNDISTURBED SOIL OR = j I" 'III" 'III"'III"'III"'- COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2 TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL PRUNE TRIM BROKEN & DEAD STEMS ONLY PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TO PREVENT ROTTING 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH FINISH GRADE - PLACE PLANT TO BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AS IN PRIOR GROWING CONDITION. PLANTING SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS. INCORPORATE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER & MIX THOROUGHLY AS REQUIRED. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE 3 TYP. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 5 TYP. FOUNDATION PLANTING DETAIL BUILDING FACADE 1. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PAPER MANUFACTURED EXPRESSLY FOR THIS ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE 7. ALL PLANTING BEDS NOT CONTAINED BY STRUCTURES, THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST, AND REMOVE ALL ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS CURB, OR PAVING MUST BE EDGED WITH METAL WRAPPING BETWEEN MAY 1 STAND JUNE 1 ST, OR AS OF PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. LANDSCAPE EDGING. PERMALOC'CLEAN LINE' 4" X 3/16", INSTRUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST MILL FINISH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE DELIVERY DATE FOR ALL 15. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY PLANT MATERIALS. 8. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL GRADE OF SOD MUST BE HELD 1 INCH BELOW THE CONDITIONS, OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO TURF SURFACE ELEVATION OF THE PAVED SURFACE. MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, THE 9. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING THESE 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTIED BY THE SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PER SPECIFICATIONS. ANY ACTS OF ARCHITECT. VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO 10. ADJUSTMENT IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT THE OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE MATERIAL MAY BE NEEDED IN THE FIELD. SHOULD AN 16. ALL SINGLE STEM TREES SHALL BE STOCK THAT WAS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT GROWN EXPRESSLY AS SUCH. MULTIPLE STEM STOCK MUST BE NOTIFIED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO WITH STEMS REMOVED WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 4. PROVIDE MIN. 18" PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 1/3 ADJUSTMENT. TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND AND 1/3 ORGANIC MATTER (FULLY 17. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE COMPOSTED ORGANIC COMPOST OR PEAT MOSS) IN 11. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE SHRUB AND PERENNIALS BEDS PER SPECIFICATIONS. (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE WHERE SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS ARE GROUPED, TAG PROVIDED BY NURSERY OR PLANT SOURCE WHICH CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR CREATE ONE CONTINUOUS PLANTING BED. LANDSCAPE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE LANDSCAPE QUOTATION. ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE SOIL MIXTURE PRIOR TO ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL. SPREADING. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT TESTING 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST RESULTS AND FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 12. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPON REVIEW PRIOR TO APPROVAL. INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK. FERTILIZER AS INDICATED MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE THE SOIL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. DECOMPACTED SUBGRADE AFTER DECOMPACTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND PRIOR TO TOPSOIL 13. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER PLACEMENT. PLANTING DETAILS. 6. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE UNCOLORED 4 INCH 14. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE GROUND TO DEPTH OF DOUBLE -SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK THE FIRST BRANCH FOR WINTER. WRAPPING MATERIAL MULCH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE MULCH SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PRUNE TRIM BROKEN AND DEAD STEMS ONLY FINISHED GRADE - PLACE PLANT TO BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS IN PRIOR PLANTING CONDITION PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TO PREVENT ROTTING 4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ALL BED EDGES THAT DO NOT ABUT PERMANENT HARD SURFACES SHALL BE EDGED WITH METAL EDGING. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. PLANTING SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS. INCORPORATE FERTILIZER PER SPECIFICATIONS AND MIX THOROUGHLY. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF EXCAVATION PRIOR TO PLANTING UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE MAINTAIN SLOPES PER GRADING PLAN TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE. SEE CIVIL FOR GRADING. Lyngblomsten Senior Communities Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Ave W, St Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 C 0 L B E R G I T E W S landscape architecture 3101 East Franklin Avenue I Minneapolis MN 55406 colbergtews.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CAD FILE, DIGITAL, AND PRINTED DOCUMENT USAGE CONDITIONS CAD files, digital, and printed documents prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant's professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These files and documents shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CAD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CAD files, digital, or printed documents shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota " -- " 7 44 -. T, --- , License Garrett A. Tews Number: 48408 Date 5/11/2020 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 DID SET 06/28/2019 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 CD SET 10/04/2019 FINAL PLAN/ FINAL PLAT 05/11/2020 Comm: 186024 Date: 05/11/2020 Drawn: Check: North Planting Notes and Details 6 TYP. PLANT BED EDGING DETAIL Scale: NOT TO SCALE L300 2H I1 u ME ME M MOM IN 1IIIII 11,I111111 ���� IIIII IIII! IIII ■ �' R 1111111111 IIIIIIIIII ■ . ■ ■ . ■ i!!! i iM IIIIII II iiiii IIII III IIII � I I I : i iiii IIII on on ;;; IIIIII IIIIII ;;;; : 1111111111 IIIIII111 I■ i iiii IIII i■iii i o • • ■ ■ IIIII IIIIII IIII!! ��� . ■ ■ Jill IIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIII IIIII �Igl IIIII IIII IIII IIIII IIIIII i iii ii ii ii ii ii .V. NMI ON MIM1 IN IN a� wol in �l E E.3 �F �� �G,(G.1) (G.3) ( 5 6 7 ..... ..... B4 B3.6 B3 B2 8 Lyngbiomsten Lino Lakes Campus MN /-1 B C E 9 E Q�—EVEL 4 134'-4 3W LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" o< - CV E N _ CD o$ M LEVEL 2 112'-1" A�VEL 1 _ , F 100'-0" STOP OF W 146'�6" 4145`-3 1 /2" v LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 _ 112'-1 Q� LEVEL 1 100'-0" O Ln (M LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" v LEVEL 3 123'-2 7/8" a v LEVEL 2 112'-v v LEVEL 1 100'-0" INDEPENDENT LIVING SOUTH 1O6OF W.SP �14345'-1 /Z LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3 1-2 522 W LEVEL 2 _ 112'-1" LEVEL 1 100'-0" TOWN CENTER SOUTH LEVEL 4 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 _ 112'-1" LEVEL 1 _ � 100'-0" ASSISTED LIVING NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' J (G.9) (G.3) (G.1) E.3 ASSISTED LIVING NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 6' 12' ■ (G.9) J 16 15.2 15 LEVEL 4_ 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3_ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2_ - 112'-1" LEVEL 1 100'-0" ASSISTED LIVING EAST 1'-0" 0 6' 12' 14.1 � = 11 I■I■ I11■I I■I ■I■I 11■I I I■I I■I ■I■I I■I I I■I I■I ■I■I I■I I I■I 1 11 .� ' ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ �r � � � I1I I 1I� I1I 1I I I 1I I1I I I1 i� r WE 13 12 11.6 11.2 11 (B.2) Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 RC i rLHR I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA License RICK J. MOORE Number: 14836 Date 10/4/19 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DID SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 Comm: 196015 Date: 8/12/2020 - P+Z Drawn: Author Check: BP EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ASSISTED LIVING SOUTH .� ASSISTED LIVING SOUTH 1/8" = 1170" 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' REFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA 1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT S Scale: As indicated ... A5m 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BF BG BH BJ Lyngbiomsten Lino Lakes Campus 11.6 12 13 14 14.1 15 15.2 15.9 I I I I TOP OF 1 A6,�611 - - - - - - - - - - - - �145'-3 1 /2" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I A 134' 4L3/4" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 134' 4L3/4" - - - �134' 4L3/4" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I Lyngblomsten 1415 Almond Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 111111 1111k I FE-11 FE-11 I I LEVEL 3 - - - - - - - - - - - LEVEL 3 - - _ - : -LEVEL 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MN 123 2 7/8" - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ -_ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ 123 2 7/8" 123 2 7/8" -_ _ _ _ _ N - _ _ - _- - - mil_-- -_ -- -- fr �` O - CV - - _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - 00 0? 80 CY) LO FRI FE 11 F051 LEVEL 2 _ _ - - LEVEL 2 _ - LEVEL 2 - - - - - - - - - - -- V - O 1 11 - - - - -- 1 11 - - - - 112 �112-1 - _ • a - - -r Fff - LEF01 I VEL 1 _ _ _ •. - - _,. �. - .. � ,=-,- _ - - _ _ - _ = LEVEL 1 _ - LEV_ EL WOLD ARCHITECTS 1 - D2 A5.504 •�.: _ - AND ENGINEERS `, \ III III -III III III III III III III III -III 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 - D1 D2 �- -�1 I I1 1IIIIIIIIIII1I 1I 11IIII I- Saint Paul, MN 55101 _III-IIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-III-IIIIIIIII-III- . �, � - - - ._, � i 1 5.504 A5.504 BBASEME T - - _ . - - - - - - BASEMENT - - - - \ - - - � � �� ���1�� �l ��1_1 �� l �_1�1 I I i���- I - I-1 � woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 88 -0 88 -0 LOADING DOCK / GARAGE B3 ASSISTED LIVING LOUNGE 65 ASSISTED LIVING WEST OB1 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 /8 = 1 -0 0 6' 12, 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' Exterior Elevation Materials �� �� �� A Cladding Material Area Cladding Material Aro,3 Cladding Material Area Cladding Material Area Cladding Material Area BC BC.4 BC.6 BC. BD A5.101/B1 Siding Total 2,828 A5.102/C1 Siding Total 1715 A5.103/B1 Siding Total 497 AS.104/C2 Siding Total A13/C1 Siding Total 1408 Pc,^ Blue 517 9% Blue 505 10% White 497 17% Blue 627 53% Blue 955 29% Wood 67D 12% Wood 537 11% Stone 1,6215 56% Wood 257 22% Wood 453 14% > White 1,641 28% White 1,210 24% Windows/Doors/Louvers 791.5 27% Windows/Doors/Louvers 302 25% Stone 1,347 41% Stone 1,769 31% Stone 1,707 34% A5.103/63 Stone 22:6 100% A5.104/D5 Siding Total 1395 Windows/Doors/Louvers 554 17% TOP OF WALL D Windows/Doors/Louvers 1172 20% Windows/Doars/Louvers 1023 21% A5.103/65 Siding Total 313.4 Blue 593 36% A13/C5 Siding Total 714 '-T - - - - - - - - O°.o3.. D C A5-101/B4 SidingTotal 4114 AS, Siding Total 878 Blue 140 3% Wood 601 36% Blue 714 36% � P� g 145'-3 1 /2" Blue 844 109D Blue 654 19% Wood 2,237 51% Stone 348 21% Stone 897 46% E Wood 1,337 17% Wood 1,026 29% White 757 17% WindowsMoors/Louvers 112 7% Windows/Doors/Louvers 350 18% 03 White 1,933 24% White 224 6% Stone 53.4 12% A5.104/E2 Siding Total 874 A13/E1 Siding Total 945 0 Stone 2,436 30% Stone 903 26% Windows/Doors/Louvers 737 17% Blue 143 16% Blue 705 36% A I I I V Windows/Doors/Louvers 1496 19% Windows/Doors/Louvers 699 20% A5.103/D4 Siding Total 13417 White 731 81% Wood 240 12% A5.101/D1 Siding Total 7180 A5.102/C7 Siding Total 859 Wood 937 49% Windows/Doors/Louvers 24.25 3% Stone 678 34% A5 103 Blue 3,218 22°% White 859 52% White 4019 21°I° A5.104/F5 Siding Total 0 0°% Windows/Doors/Louvers 350 18% LEVEL 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _LEVEL 4 _ _ _ _ 134'-4 3/4" 134'-4 3/4" B5 / A5.103 Wood 2,030 14°/D Stone 627 27% Stone fi18 31°JD Stone 253 72°/D A13 E4 Siding Total 714 White 1,932 13% Windows/Doc rs/Louvers 172 10% A5.103/E6 Siding Total 1362 Windows/Doors/Louvers 100 28% Blue 714 29% KEY PLAN Stone 4,896 34% AS.102/D1 Siding Total 2559 White 694 49% AS.104/F6 Siding Total 1003 Stone 1273 52% Windows/Doors/Louvers 2308 16% Blue 70 2% Stone 66:6 46% Blue 878 53% Windows/Doors/Louvers 450 18% A5-101/F1 Siding Total 3445 Wood 1,295 33% Windows/Doors/Louvers 75 5% Wood 125 8% A13/F1 Siding Total 774 - N Blue 407 5% White 1,194 30% AS. 103/F1 Siding 1888 Stone 324 19% Wood 774 61% N iv Wood 676 9% Stone 797 20% Blue 1,427 40% Windows/Doors/Louvers 336 20% Stone 404 32% LEVEL 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ cfl LEVEL 3 _ white 2,362 30% Windows/Doors/Louvers 616,75 16% white 278 9% Windows/Doors/Louvers 100 8% �123'-2 7/8" �123'-2 A13 F6 5idin Total 915 Stone 3,0$3 39°� A5.102/D5 Siding Total 1473 Wood 183 5°I� / g - - � Windows/Doors/Louvers 1396 18°�• Blue 247 1296 Stone 981 34°Ip ° - - - -- Blue 511 42% - _ - - F �= g / / Wood 404 339'°----:._ ..�:_,.. A5-101/F5 5idin Total 191S Wood 793 38% Windows Doors Louvers 66.4 19°/ Y.. Blue 359 10% White 433 21% A5.103/F3 Siding 913 Stone 20,117°/D - Wood 897 26% Stone 297 14% Wood 913 74°% Windows/Doors/Louvers 100 8°% White 659 19% Windows/Doors/Louvers 299.25 14% Windows/Doors/Louvers 328.5 26°fD LEVEL 2 - LEVEL 2� Stone 1,010 29% AS.102/F1 Siding Total 2340 A5-103/F5 Siding Total 1838 � - - - - - - - - - - '- Windows/Doors/Louvers 500 15% Blue 309 9% Blue 8913 21% Totals Siding 54532 SF A5-101/F8 wood 299 100% Wood 1,261 36% Wood 472 11% Blue 16,0215E- White 770 22% White 703 1G°ID -. _'.: Wood 19,827 5F - T D Stone 550 16, Stone 1,545 36% White 18,684 5F - -- -.-� _.-:-; _- ...... Windows/Doors/Louvers 622.5 181Windows/Doors/Louvers 653.25 15% Stone 30,949 5�- A5.102/F4 Siding Total 1624 Windows/Doors/Louvers 17018 SF - - - Blue 139 5% Total Including W/D/L 102,499 5F = - Wood 570 2196 Total Not Including W/D/L 85481 5F LEVEL 1 LEVEL White 915 34% Stone % Not including Windows 36.2°I� Stone 620 23% Windows/Doors/Louvers 465 17% A5.102/F6 Siding Total 1778 Blue 455 20°/° Wood 840 36% White 483 21% SKILLED NURSING CONNECTION AT VERTICAL CIRCULATION SKILLED NURSING CONNECTION WALL Stone 322 14% D4 1/8" - 1'-0" E6 1/8" - 1'-0" Windows/boors/Louvers 225 10% 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' p I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by B2 B 3 B 3 B 3.6 B 4 6 5 6 6 B 7 me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed B1 B2 under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA I I I S 6 s 6 r License RICK J. MOORE TOP OF WALL TOP OF WALL _. Number: 14836 Date 10/4/19 y � �145'-3 1 /2" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �145-3 1 /21r -. - - -- - - - - - - - - m> , R F Revisions E 145'-3 1 /2" �I Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 a PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DID SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 E LEVEL 4 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 4 ' CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 a;l i1134'-4 3/4" - - - - - 134'-4 3/4" - - - - - - - - 3134'-4 3/4" - - - - - - - - - _ PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 L. . E N LEVEL 3 _ _ Comm: 196015 - - - _ _ - EL "' EL " "a 123 2 7/8 _ _ - - 1L2E3, 2 7/8 - - - - - - - - - 1L2E3 2 7/8 - - I - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - co c m� II - 00 V �_- n V i_ n - I - - - - - �- 1 - Drawn: Author - - - # EX-W8S EX- 8W. _ _ _ _ Check: BP - MAN ENTRAN i -2 ,I �. - ,EXTERIOR LEVEL 2 v LEVEL 2 - - - - - - -LEVEL 2 - - - - - - - _ _ _� _ _ - - - - ., 112'-1" - - - --'.-.,_:_. �.,... ..... _ J^= _ - - _ _ - _ _- - 112'-1" 112'-1" - -. :.. - r_F ELEVATIONS ,_.: SF2 S 2 - - - - A F Ya - - FR5 - - - - - - I jl LEVEL 1 - . .._ _ - - = LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 _ _ _ - _ 100 -0 100 -0 100 -0 EQ EQ ACCENT WALL IT7 Scale: As indicated TOWN CENTER WEST -SOUTH F 5 118" _ 11-011 -� TOWN CENTER WEST -NORTH TOWN CENTER WEST o 6' 12' F 3 II _III 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' ■ A MN B C 9 E s A BA 66 BC BC.4 BC.6 BC.9 TOWN CENTER CANOPY SOUTH STOP OF WALL_ 146';-6" 1145'-3 1 /2" LEVEL 4_ 134'-4 —3A LEVEL 3_ _ 123'-2 7/8" ROOF DECK NORTH WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-011 0 612' B4 ,TOP OF W 146'-6" 14145'-3 1 /2" LEVEL 4 _ 134'-4 3/4" LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 - 112'-1" LEVEL 1 100'-0" TOWN CENTER NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 0 6' 12' BD BC.6 66 BA STOP OF W 146'-6" 5'-3 1 /2" BD C.9 BC.6 BC.4 BC 0 CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONE WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN S 5101 woldae.com 1 651 227 7773 KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA License RICK J. MOORE Number: 14836 Date 10/4/19 Revisions Description Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubmittal 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28/2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 Comm: 196015 Date: 8/12/2020 - P+Z Drawn: Author Check: BP North EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale: As indicated ... A5ml MN ►_1 LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 _ 112'-1" B C E LEVEL 1 _ 1-011 SKILLED NURSING SOUTH LEVEL 3 12123'-2 7/8" Q LEVEL 2 `S 112'-1" LEVEL 1 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING SOUTH M c0 N ih M N LEVE �123'- Q LEVE 112'- LEVE 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING NORTH 1/8" = 1'-019 0 6' 12' 0 6' 12' t 5 U m N E `t7l15 LEVEL 3 _ - U _ Eo NE i - d = LEVEL 2- �a �112'-1" - E caw :� _ _ •—� ._ U rvU�w LEVEL 1 _ 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING WEST F1 1/8" = 1'-011 _ 1 A F LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" v LEVEL 2 _ 112'-1" 1 lir1111111ii v LEVEL 1 _ 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING WEST 1/8" = 1'-0" _ LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 1_ 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING NORTH 1 /8" — 1'-011 LEVEL 3 _ 123'-2 7/8" LEVEL 2 112'-1" LEVEL 1 100'-0" SKILLED NURSING WEST 0 6' 12' c? M N M M N M M N N 00 N WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 woldae.com f 651 227 7773 KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA License RICK J. MOORE Number: 14836 Date 10/4/19 Revisions beseription Date Num PUD Submittal 10/08/2018 1 PUD Resubmittal 01/14/2019 2 PUD Resubrn a 03/11/2019 3 DD SET 06/28I2019 4 CD CHECK SET 08/30/2019 5 CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/2019 6 CD SET 10/04/2019 7 PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020 8 Comm: 196015 Date: 8/12/2020 - P+Z Drawn: Author Check: Checker North EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale: As indicated ..... REFER TO A5.103 FOR EXTERIOR MATERIAL SF. COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES CS-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING EVENING BLUE CS-2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING ARCTIC WHITE CS-4 WOOD LOOK FIBER CEMENT SIDING WARM SIENNA MSV-1 MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER OHIO BLUE VEIN CUT STONE nwo, Li LOADING DOCK SECTION Lyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus MAY 11, 2020 LOADING DOCK SCREENING Comm No: 196015 nwo, LOADING DOCK SECTION - FACING LOADING DOCK Lyngblomsten Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Campus MAY 11, 2020 LOADING DOCK SCREENING Comm No: 196015 4� PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: August 12, 2020 REQUEST: 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive Building Setback and Fence Height Variances CASE NUMBER: VR2020-001 APPLICANT: Anoka County Highway Department 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd Andover, MN 55304 OWNER: Patrick and Patricia Barry 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: July 10, 2020 60-Day Review Deadline: September 8, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: August 12, 2020 Tentative City Council Meeting: August 24, 2020 BACKGROUND Anoka County Highway Department, on behalf of Patrick and Patricia Barry, submitted a Land Use Application for building setback and fence height variances. This is related to the 2021 reconstruction project of Birch Street from Hokah Drive to Old Birch Street and necessary acquisition of road right-of-way. ANALYSIS Anoka County is proposing to reconstruct Birch Street from Hokah Drive to Old Birch Street in 2021. The improvements include construction of roundabouts at Tomahawk Trail and West Shadow Lake Drive, storm water quality improvements, utility and pedestrian trail improvements and appurtenant work. The roundabout design at West Shadow Lake Drive has been modified to minimize property impacts to the greatest extent possible. Road right-of-way acquisition is necessary which will result in building setbacks along CSAH 34 (Birch Street) being reduced less than required by zoning ordinance. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The lot size outside of the road right-of- way will be 11,214 sf. which exceeds the minimum 10,800 sf requirement. The house was constructed 1935 according to Anoka County GIS Tax Link data. CSAH 34 (Birch Street) is a minor arterial road and West Shadow Lake Drive is a local road. The County initiated talks with the property owners regarding acquisition of the entire property; however, the property owners were not interested. The parties have agreed to the roundabout road right-of-way easements with the condition that variances be granted to make the existing house and deck structures legal conforming. Without the variances, the structures would be considered legal non -conforming and subject to the regulations of the City's Non -Conforming Uses and Structures ordinance. Building Setback Variance Per Section 1007.090(2)(d), the required building setback from a local street (West Shadow Lake Drive) is 30 feet and from an arterial road (Birch Street) is 40 feet. The following chart summarizes the setback variances: Street IF Required Setback Proposed Setback Variance West Shadow Lake 30 ft 34.3 ft No variance needed Drive CSAH 34 (Birch St) 40 ft 28.3 ft-southwest 11.7 ft corner of house CSAH 34 (Birch St) 40 ft 29 ft-southwest corner 11 ft of deck CSAH 34 (Birch St) 40 ft 34 ft-south perimeter 6 ft of deck Fence Height The property owners also requested a berm and 6 ft privacy fence be installed on the southwest section of the property for additional screening. City code Section 1007.043(17)(f)-Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards allows for a 6 ft screen between residential uses and arterial roads. The screen can be a 6 ft fence, berm or a combination of both. Typically, these screens are located along the side or rear lot lines of a residential development, not along the front lot line. Section 1007.043(18)(f)-Fences and Walls does not allow for a fence greater than 4 feet in height in the front yard. A variance to allow for a 6 ft cedar privacy on a 1.5 ft berm in the front yard as shown on the attached Boundary Survey would provide additional screening and privacy and eliminate future any issues or concerns with the screen fence. 2 Driveway There are currently two driveway/curb cuts onto West Shadow Lake Drive. The southern curb cut will be eliminated with the roundabout construction. The northern driveway will remain. No variance is needed. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs 1. through 7. below. The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance is to provide a residential atmosphere for the person desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. Building setbacks provide separation between structures and transportation corridors. The variance to allow for varying building setbacks and 6 foot high fence with berm is harmonious with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided for Low Density Residential land use. The variance request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant's property is intended for single family dwellings with houses, garages, driveways and fences. 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The property owner proposes to continue to use the property as a single family house in a reasonable manner. There are practical difficulties in either redesigning the CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and West Shadow Lake Drive intersection or relocating the house. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to the Anoka County's and the City's interest to improve the CSAH 34 (Birch Street) transportation corridor. The roundabout design at the intersection has been modified to minimize property impacts to the greatest extent possible. The circumstances are not created by the property owner. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. 3 The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality which is a single family residential neighborhood with houses, garages, decks, driveways and fences. 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. The variance will not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and houses, garages, decks, driveways and fences are consistent with residential uses. 7. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the following variances for 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive: • An 11.7 foot variance to reduce the building setback from the southwest corner of the house to CSAH 34 (Birch Street) from 40 feet to 28.3 feet • An 11 foot variance to reduce the building setback from the southwest corner of the deck to CSAH 34 (Birch Street) from 40 feet to 29 feet • A 6 foot variance to reduce the building setback from the south perimeter of the deck to CSAH 34 (Birch Street) from 40 feet to 34 feet • A 2 foot variance to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet as shown on the attached Boundary Survey. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Boundary Survey prepared by Anoka County's Surveyor's Office dated July 10, 2020 M N Aerial Ma o 25 10 ,00 CITYOF W E Feet IN KE 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive s.