HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-14-2022 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, March 14, 2022
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Sarah Cotton
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers (not televised)
1. Strategic Planning/Goal Setting, Sarah Cotton
2. Oak Wilt Abatement Order, Andy Nelson
3. Rookery Murals, Lisa Lamey
4. Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call - Ruhland, Stoesz, Cavegn, Lyden, Rafferty were present
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment (in person or received in writing prior to meeting)
There were no comments
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
The agenda was accepted as presented
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) March 14, 2022 (Check No. 116006 through 116098 in amt of $906,480.82
B) Consider Approval of February 28, 2022 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider Approval of February 28, 2022 Council Meeting Minutes
D) Consider Resolution No. 22-27, Reestablishing Precincts and Polling Locations
E) Consider Resolution No. 22-32 Accepting Water Treatment Pilot Study
F) Consider Approval of March 7, 2022 Special Council Meeting Minutes
G) Consider Approval of March 7, 2022 Work Session Minutes
H) Consider Resolution No. 22-34, Supporting Legislative Efforts Ensuring
Sustainable, Safe, and Reliable Water Supply, Michael Grochala
I) Approve Application for Aquinas Roman Catholic Home Education Services to
Conduct Excluded Bingo Event
J) Approve Application for St. Joseph of the Lakes Catholic Church for an Exempt
Permit for Lawful Gambling
Council Agenda -2-
Action Taken: Motion by Cavegn, seconded by Ruhland, to approve
Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1J, as presented, was adopted
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Appointment of Activity Center Coordinator, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Lyden, seconded by Cavegn, to approve the
appointment of Ben Natzke as recommended, was adopted
B) Consider Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Cavegn, to approve the
appointment of Kyle Dubois as recommended, was adopted
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Rehbeins Black Dirt (21st Avenue S), Kelsey Gelhar
i) Consider Resolution No. 22-30 Approving Conditional Use Permit
ii) Consider Resolution No. 22-31 Approving Site Improvement Performance
Agreement
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Cavegn, to approve
Resolutions No. 22-30 and Resolution No. 22-31 as presented, was adopted
B) Consider Resolution No. 22-33, Approving Agreement with Rice Creek Watershed
District, Shenandoah Park BMP Feasibility Study, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Ruhland, seconded by Lyden, to approve
Resolution No. 22-33, as presented, was adopted
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
March 14, 2022 through March 28, 2022
Monday, March 28 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, March 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting
Updated 3/11/2022
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, March 14, 2022
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
City Administrator: Sarah Cotton
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers (not televised)
1.Strategic Planning/Goal Setting, Sarah Cotton
2.Oak Wilt Abatement Order, Andy Nelson
3.Rookery Murals, Lisa Lamey
4.Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment (in person or received in writing prior to meeting)
Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
1.CONSENT AGENDA
A)Consideration of Expenditures:
i)March 14, 2022 (Check No. 116006 through 116098 in the Amount of
$906,480.82
B)Consider Approval of February 28, 2022 Work Session Minutes
C)Consider Approval of February 28, 2022 Council Meeting Minutes
D)Consider Resolution No. 22-27, Reestablishing Precincts and Polling Locations
E)Consider Resolution 22-32 Accepting Water Treatment Pilot Study, Michael
Grochala
F)Consider Approval of March 7, 2022 Special Council Meeting Minutes
G)Consider Approval of March 7, 2022 Work Session Minutes
H)Consider Resolution No. 22-34, Supporting Legislative Efforts Ensuring
Sustainable, Safe, and Reliable Water Supply, Michael Grochala
I)Consider Approval of Application for Aquinas Roman Catholic Home
Education Services to Conduct Excluded Bingo Event
J)Consider Approval of Application for St. Joseph of the Lakes Catholic Church
for an Exempt Permit for Lawful Gambling.
Council Agenda -2-
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Appointment of Activity Center Coordinator, Sarah Cotton
B) Consider Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker, Sarah Cotton
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Rehbeins Black Dirt (21st Avenue S), Kelsey Gelhar
i) Consider Resolution No. 22-30 Approving Conditional Use Permit
ii) Consider Resolution No. 22-31 Approving Site Improvement Performance
Agreement
B) Consider Resolution No. 22-33, Approving Agreement with Rice Creek Watershed
District, Shenandoah Park BMP Feasibility Study, Michael Grochala
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
March 14, 2022 through March 28, 2022
Monday, March 28 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, March 28 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting
WS – Item 1
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 1
Date: March 14, 2022
To: City Council
From: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator
Re: Strategic Planning/Goal Setting
Background
At the February 7, 2022, City Council Work Session, the City Council discussed
scheduling a strategic planning/goal setting session and reviewed the process last
completed in 2017. The Council expressed support for bringing in a facilitator in 2022
and directed staff to bring forward recommendations to support the effort.
Staff contacted two meeting facilitators who were recommended by other cities.
Proposals were received from Craig Rapp, President of Craig Rapp LLC/Rapp
Consulting Group, and Craig Waldron, Owner of The Waldron Company. Both
facilitators outline a similar approach commencing with a planning meeting with staff to
learn about the current operating environment, projects, and potential concerns or issues
that need to be addressed. Both facilitators propose utilizing a SWOT analysis to get
visibility into the current state of the City and help develop strategic, high level priorities
for the coming year. A summary report detailing the process, outcomes, targets, and
action plan will be prepared and submitted to the City for use in implementing “the plan”.
Craig Waldron Proposal – One 8-Hour Session, prefers offsite meeting location. Can
accommodate two 4-hour sessions, but then prefers an evening session and following
morning. Proposed fee of $160 per hour, plus mileage. Estimate of $2,000-$3,000 for
entire project.
Craig Rapp Proposal – Two 4-Hour Sessions or One 8-Hour Session – The 4-hour
sessions are typically held on consecutive weekday evenings. Proposed fee of $14,250.
The 2022 Budget includes $4,000 for a Strategic Planning/Goal Setting Facilitator.
Requested Council Direction
Consider selecting a facilitator and discuss tentative dates/times for the session(s).
Attachments
None
WS – Item 2
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 2
Date: March 14th, 2022
To: City Council
From: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator
Re: Oak Wilt Abatement Order
Background
Oak wilt is a fungal disease that kills large numbers of oak trees every year in Minnesota.
The disease is transmitted to new sites by beetles that are attracted both to the fungus
itself and to wounds on oak trees. Without proper management, the disease can then
spread to other oaks in the vicinity of an infected tree, ultimately resulting in the loss of
many more trees. The impact of this disease can be minimized through proper
management techniques.
Minnesota Statute 18G addresses local pest control and grants the authority to local
governments to adopt and enforce regulations to control and prevent the spread of plant
pests and diseases. These regulations authorize entering and inspecting public and
private places that might harbor plant pests, requiring owners to destroy or treat diseased
plants, or providing for the work at the expense of the owner.
Chapter 902 of the City Code addresses tree disease management. The city forester is
authorized by this chapter to enter private property to inspect and diagnose tree disease.
If infection exists, the tree is marked and a letter is sent to the owner outlining action
steps required with a deadline to abate the nuisance. If the tree has not been removed by
the deadline, the tree may then be removed by a contractor working for the city, at the
homeowner’s expense.
A majority of the 47 trees marked for oak wilt last fall have been removed. There are,
however, a few properties that have failed to meet the deadline. The removals are time
sensitive, and must be accomplished by the end of March to ensure that spread of the
disease is minimized. Impacted residents that have not met the removal deadline will be
receiving a follow-up notice informing them that the contracted removals will be
occurring later in March.
Requested Council Direction
Information only. Staff will be available for any Council questions or concerns.
Attachments
1. Notice Regarding Diseased Trees
NOTICE REGARDING DISEASED TREES
Dear Homeowner,
In accordance with Chapter 902 of the Municipal Code and as granted by statutory law, the City
of Lino Lakes conducts a program of shade tree disease and pest control that focuses on Dutch
elm disease fungus, elm bark beetles, oak wilt fungus, emerald ash borer, and other potentially
non-native invasive pests and pathogens that affect trees. Chapter 902 also establishes abatement
procedures, deadlines, and other regulatory requirements associated with the program.
One or more tree(s) located on your property were recently inspected and marked as diseased or
pest infested by the Certified City tree inspector. This letter serves as written notice from the
City of Lino Lakes that requires corrective action by the property owner to remove the marked
tree(s).
Tree Details:
Property owners are responsible for removing diseased and/or pest infested tree(s) located on
private property. Vibratory plowing to sever root grafts may also be required if the city forester
deems it likely that the disease could leave your property and impact other trees in the area.
Please remove the marked tree(s) by February 1st, 2022. The City recommends removal of
infected oaks after November 1st. Please be advised that trees that have not been removed,
or felled and properly covered by February 1st 2022 may be removed by a contractor
working for the city. These contracted removals will be performed at the homeowner’s
expense.
Homeowners may keep the wood provided that it is completely covered with plastic 4 mils or
greater in thickness and sealed to the ground to prevent beetles from accessing or vacating the
wood. Firewood must remain covered from March 31st of 2022 until October 1st of 2022.
Thank you for helping us to manage tree disease in Lino Lakes.
Respectfully,
Andy Nelson Office 651-982-2465
Environmental Coordinator, City of Lino Lakes ANelson3@linolakes.us
ISA Certified Arborist
WS – Item 3
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 3
Date: March 14, 2022
To: City Council
From: Lisa Lamey, Rookery Activity Center Manager
Re: Mural in the Aquatic Area
Background
In January 2022 a local muralist/artist contacted staff about the desire and/or need for
painted murals in The Rookery Activity Center. Staff determined that the north wall near
the lap pool is a large expanse of wall that would be a good space for a mural. In January
designs that included the logo were brought to council for consideration. Since then, staff
has had the artist prepare a few other designs including different logos options and a
scenic mural. Staff has also researched other community center indoor pool walls for
comparison.
Staff has attached a number of pictures of other community center indoor pools and new
designs that have been rendered for the Rookery pool area by the previously mentioned
artist.
Requested Council Direction
Consider a theme and/or design for wall mural in the Aquatic Area.
Attachment
Example of Pool Murals
Maplewood YMCA
Maple Grove Community Center
Shoreview Community Center
Chaska Community Center
Inver Grove Heights Community Center
Overland Park Community Center (Kansas City)
Shakopee Community Center
Expenditures
March 14, 2022
Check #116006 to #116098
$906,480.82
City of Lino Lakes
Activity Codes
Code Description Code Description
401 Mayor/Council 817 Spring Fling
402 Administration 818 Winter Festival
403 Elections 819 Community Gardens
404 Cable TV 822 Family Corn Roast
405 Charter Administration 827 Gobbler Games
407 Finance 830 Adult Golf Lessons
414 Legal Consultants 835 Youth Skating Class
415 Economic Development 850 Golf Academy
416 Planning & Zoning 856 Youth Soccer
417 Engineering 857 Soccer Fundamentals
418 Community Development 860 Secret Shop
420 Police Protection 864 Preschool Playtime
421 Fire Protection 868 Little Goblins Party
422 Building Inspections 871 Flag Football
430 Streets 875 Snow Day
431 Fleet Management 876 Kite Day
432 Government Buildings 877 Rockin' in the Park
450 Parks 879 Movies in the Park
451 Recreation 890 Senior Programs
461 Environmental
462 Solid Waste Abatement
463 Forestry
494 Water
495 Sanitary Sewer
499 Other
802 Dodgeball Camp
806 Youth T-Ball
808 Youth Baseball Camp
810 Youth Playground
811 Youth Safety Camp
812 Youth Art Camps
814 Senior Programs/Book Club
AP Checks by Account Number
3/14/2022 City Council Meeting
Vendor Fund/Dept Account Amount Check # Description
AFSCME Council #5 101-000 101-000-2040-000 483.84 116006 PR Batch 00002.03.2022 Union Dues AFSCME
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-000 101-000-2040-000 370.46 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
International Union 101-000 101-000-2040-000 525.00 116008 PR Batch 00002.03.2022 Union Dues 49ers
Law Enforcement Labor Services 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,495.00 116009 PR Batch 00002.03.2022 Union Dues LELS
Medica 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,690.72 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,346.80 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,346.80 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-2040-000 1,346.80 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Medica 101-000 101-000-2041-000 8,364.90 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-000 101-000-2044-000 972.80 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. 101-000 101-000-2048-000 100.69 116055 March Vision Insurance
Anoka County Central Communications 101-000 101-000-2080-000 2,225.65 116013 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
Centennial Lakes Police Department 101-000 101-000-2080-000 2,133.69 116032 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Anoka 101-000 101-000-2080-000 767.37 116035 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Blaine 101-000 101-000-2080-000 2,827.71 116036 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Columbia Heights 101-000 101-000-2080-000 758.60 116037 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Coon Rapids 101-000 101-000-2080-000 3,226.34 116038 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Fridley 101-000 101-000-2080-000 1,786.95 116039 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of Ramsey 101-000 101-000-2080-000 1,827.20 116040 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
City of St. Francis 101-000 101-000-2080-000 673.27 116042 Q4 2021 TZD Grant
Met Council Environmental Services (SAC) 101-000 101-000-2120-000 27,335.00 116075 February 2022 SAC
Met Council Environmental Services (SAC) 101-000 101-000-3414-000 -273.35 116075 February 2022 SAC
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-3730-000 0.14 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-3730-000 0.14 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-000 101-000-3730-000 0.14 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
101-000 Total 61,332.66
Dan McMahon Photography 101-401 101-401-4200-000 20.00 116048 Council Photo - Copy
Erickson Marsha 101-401 101-401-4343-000 2,000.00 116054 Lino Lakes Spring 2022 Newsletter
101-401 Total 2,020.00
Medica 101-402 101-402-4131-000 570.73 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 6.25 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 87.74 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 87.74 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 6.25 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 6.25 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-402 101-402-4133-000 87.74 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-402 101-402-4134-000 89.86 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
First Advantage Occ. 101-402 101-402-4300-000 102.57 116056 Annual Enrollment - D. Jensen B. Olander & S. Poundstone
Occupational Health Centers of MN P.C. 101-402 101-402-4300-000 240.00 116083 New Hire Testing
Metropolitan Area Management Association 101-402 101-402-4330-000 25.00 116077 February MAMA Meeting - Legislature Update
Minnesota Society of CPAs 101-402 101-402-4452-000 340.00 116079 CPA Membership - S. Cotton
101-402 Total 1,650.13
Medica 101-407 101-407-4131-000 2,206.76 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 49.35 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 3.88 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 49.35 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 3.88 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 49.35 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-407 101-407-4133-000 3.88 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-407 101-407-4134-000 101.11 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
City of Roseville 101-407 101-407-4310-000 14,030.73 116041 March IT Services
Springbrook Holding Company LLC 101-407 101-407-4345-000 0.50 116088 February Civic Pay Credit Card Fees
101-407 Total 16,498.79
GDO Law 101-414 101-414-4303-000 8,750.00 116058 March Prosecutor Contract
GDO Law 101-414 101-414-4303-000 304.50 116058 November Forfeitures
101-414 Total 9,054.50
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 101-415 101-415-4300-000 865.63 116017 Services rendered in connection to American Rescue Plan funds
101-415 Total 865.63
Medica 101-416 101-416-4131-000 570.72 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 1.25 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 19.80 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 1.25 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 19.80 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 1.25 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-416 101-416-4133-000 19.80 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-416 101-416-4134-000 44.94 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-416 Total 678.81
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 292.00 116097 January 2022 Miscellaneous Escrow Account
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 1,204.00 116097 January 2022 Private Utility Permits
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4300-000 625.00 116097 January 2022 GPS/GIS Miscellaneous Assistance
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-417 101-417-4410-000 4,113.75 116097 January 2022 General Engineering Services
101-417 Total 6,234.75
Medica 101-418 101-418-4131-000 570.73 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 26.18 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 2.11 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 2.11 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 26.18 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 26.18 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-418 101-418-4133-000 2.11 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-418 101-418-4134-000 44.94 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-418 101-418-4300-000 125.00 116097 January 2022 GPS/GIS Miscellaneous Assistance
101-418 Total 825.54
Medica 101-420 101-420-4131-000 18,457.34 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 511.14 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 35.68 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 511.14 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 35.68 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 511.14 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-420 101-420-4133-000 35.68 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-420 101-420-4134-000 1,058.37 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Henry Schein Inc. 101-420 101-420-4211-000 87.96 116063 Spur resuscitators & non-rebreather masks
Intoximeters Inc. 101-420 101-420-4211-000 46.00 116067 Mouthpieces
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-420 101-420-4300-000 176.13 116014 January 2022 Language Line
UPS/United Parcel Service 101-420 101-420-4322-000 180.21 116095 Postage
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 225.00 116015 Uniform Allowance - New Hire K. Tracy
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 314.65 116015 Uniform Allowance - R. Strub
Aspen Mills Inc. 101-420 101-420-4370-000 39.99 116015 Uniform Allowance - C. Boehme
Connexus Energy 101-420 101-420-4381-000 30.35 116045 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-420 101-420-4381-000 4.15 116098 Electric
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-420 101-420-4410-000 19,681.00 116014 JLEC 2022 Shared Costs
101-420 Total 41,941.61
Medica 101-421 101-421-4131-000 1,451.64 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 2.45 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 37.62 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 2.45 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 37.62 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 46.23 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-421 101-421-4133-000 3.07 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-421 101-421-4134-000 65.16 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Minnesota Fire Service Certification Board 101-421 101-421-4300-000 120.00 116078 Fire Officer I Exam - D. Riley
Macqueen Equipment Inc. 101-421 101-421-4370-000 13,876.89 116070 4 sets of structural firefighting turn out gear
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116019 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116020 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116021 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116022 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116023 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116024 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116025 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116026 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116027 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116028 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116029 PT Firefighter background check
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension 101-421 101-421-4410-000 33.25 116030 PT Firefighter background check
101-421 Total 16,042.13
Medica 101-422 101-422-4131-000 2,375.70 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 4.37 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 57.12 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 4.37 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 57.12 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 3.75 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-422 101-422-4133-000 48.51 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-422 101-422-4134-000 89.88 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Avon Business Forms & Promotions 101-422 101-422-4200-000 257.29 116016 500 Correction Notices
101-422 Total 2,898.11
Medica 101-430 101-430-4131-000 2,460.61 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 7.35 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 84.55 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 84.55 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 7.35 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 88.29 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-430 101-430-4133-000 7.60 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-430 101-430-4134-000 188.75 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Hardwood Creek Lumber Inc. 101-430 101-430-4211-000 176.40 116061 Snowstake materials
Hardwood Creek Lumber Inc. 101-430 101-430-4211-000 63.20 116061 Snowstake materials
Menards - Forest Lake 101-430 101-430-4211-000 66.42 116072 Cedar lumber for mailbox repair
Earl F. Andersen 101-430 101-430-4223-000 877.10 116051 Street name signs right only & stop
Cargill Inc. 101-430 101-430-4228-000 6,338.45 116031 Deicer - 113 460 LB
Bluetarp Financial Inc. 101-430 101-430-4240-000 128.97 116018 Pneumatic roller seat & socket sets
Safe-Fast Inc. 101-430 101-430-4370-000 49.95 116087 Uniform Allowance - C. Miller
Connexus Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 1,632.67 116045 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 804.61 116098 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-430 101-430-4385-000 4,749.86 116098 Electric
101-430 Total 17,816.68
Medica 101-431 101-431-4131-000 1,933.24 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 31.38 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 2.75 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 31.38 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 2.75 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 35.12 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-431 101-431-4133-000 3.00 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-431 101-431-4134-000 98.88 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Hydraulics Plus & Consulting 101-431 101-431-4221-000 209.18 116065 2 replacement hydraulic hoses #200
Lano Equipment 101-431 101-431-4221-000 195.28 116069 Stock filter & oil
O'Reilly Automotive Stores 101-431 101-431-4221-000 145.75 116084 Stock Filters
Bluetarp Financial Inc. 101-431 101-431-4240-000 -54.03 116018 Exchanged transfer pump for smaller model
101-431 Total 2,634.68
Crown Marking Inc. 101-432 101-432-4200-000 23.50 116046 Name Plate - B. LaCroix
Image Printing & Graphics Inc 101-432 101-432-4200-000 31.50 116066 Business cards - J. Williams
Dalco Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-000 28.00 116047 Sanitary liner
Hotsy Minnesota 101-432 101-432-4211-000 141.40 116064 Pump siphon & bulk car wash soap
ACE Supply Company Inc. 101-432 101-432-4211-500 2,327.49 116010 2 Shop heaters
Menards - Forest Lake 101-432 101-432-4211-500 149.92 116072 Supplies for shop heaters
Aid Electric Corporation 101-432 101-432-4211-503 2,377.82 116011 Lamps & ballast for PD
Anoka County Treasury Office 101-432 101-432-4300-000 225.00 116014 Sites 115 116 & 117 MAR 2022 CAC Fiber
NAC Mechanical & Electrical 101-432 101-432-4300-502 211.00 116080 Replace ignitor's and flame sensors at Well #5 & Fire Station 2
NAC Mechanical & Electrical 101-432 101-432-4300-503 841.68 116080 Replaced leaking fitting in childcare
Nardini Fire Equipment Co 101-432 101-432-4300-503 79.50 116081 Recharge fire extinguisher & inspection
CenturyLink 101-432 101-432-4321-503 60.22 116034 Phone & Internet Services
Connexus Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-500 1,147.90 116045 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-501 559.33 116098 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-502 1,298.87 116098 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-432 101-432-4381-503 5,587.42 116098 Electric
CenterPoint Energy 101-432 101-432-4383-500 2,132.64 116033 Natural Gas
CenterPoint Energy 101-432 101-432-4383-501 920.48 116033 Natural Gas
CenterPoint Energy 101-432 101-432-4383-502 1,433.56 116033 Natural Gas
Metro Sales Incorporated 101-432 101-432-4410-500 95.02 116076 Copier Maintenance Contract Ricoh/MP C307 Color Copier
101-432 Total 19,672.25
Medica 101-450 101-450-4131-000 1,289.56 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 5.35 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 64.71 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 5.35 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 64.71 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 5.35 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-450 101-450-4133-000 64.71 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-450 101-450-4134-000 147.19 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Safe-Fast Inc. 101-450 101-450-4370-000 70.90 116087 Uniform Allowance - D. Jensen
Connexus Energy 101-450 101-450-4381-000 66.20 116045 Electric
Xcel Energy 101-450 101-450-4381-000 419.25 116098 Electric
CenterPoint Energy 101-450 101-450-4383-000 239.92 116033 Natural Gas
WSB & Associates Inc. 101-450 101-450-5000-000 215.75 116097 January 2021 Tower Park Site Improvements
101-450 Total 2,658.95
Medica 101-451 101-451-4131-000 148.10 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 0.29 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 3.61 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 3.61 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 0.29 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 0.29 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-451 101-451-4133-000 3.61 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-451 101-451-4134-000 10.11 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-451 Total 169.91
Medica 101-461 101-461-4131-000 171.22 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 5.16 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 0.38 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 0.38 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 5.16 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 0.38 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-461 101-461-4133-000 5.16 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-461 101-461-4134-000 13.47 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-461 Total 201.31
Medica 101-462 101-462-4131-000 114.15 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 3.45 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 0.25 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 3.45 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 0.25 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 0.25 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-462 101-462-4133-000 3.45 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-462 101-462-4134-000 8.99 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
101-462 Total 134.24
Medica 101-463 101-463-4131-000 142.68 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 0.31 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 4.31 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 4.31 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 0.31 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 4.31 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 101-463 101-463-4133-000 0.31 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 101-463 101-463-4134-000 11.24 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Gerten Greenhouses & Garden Center Inc. 101-463 101-463-4211-000 108.90 116059 Tree stump treating chemicals
Upper Cut Tree Service 101-463 101-463-4410-000 3,200.00 116094 Tree Removal - 171 Elm St
101-463 Total 3,476.68
Medica 202-451 202-451-4131-000 177.72 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 0.82 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 12.25 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 0.82 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 12.25 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 0.82 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 202-451 202-451-4133-000 12.25 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 202-451 202-451-4134-000 29.21 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Frattallone's/Circle Pines Ace 202-451 202-451-4211-000 50.72 116057 5 gallon buckets w/lids
ULine 202-451 202-451-4211-301 780.08 116093 Storage racks
Indigo Signs 202-451 202-451-4240-301 7,975.00 116007 The Rookery Activity Center sign and installation - 50% down
Aid Electric Corporation 202-451 202-451-4300-301 580.13 116011 Wire washer & dryer at the Rookery
Aid Electric Corporation 202-451 202-451-4300-301 10,040.74 116011 Lighting upgrades fan install & outlets for lights
Aid Electric Corporation 202-451 202-451-4300-301 1,123.42 116011 Pool exit signs & installation
Aid Electric Corporation 202-451 202-451-4300-301 235.49 116011 Add circuit for dehumidification system in Rookery studio
CivicPlus 202-451 202-451-4300-301 2,625.00 116043 GIS Integration
Meridian Energy Products 202-451 202-451-4300-301 4,886.00 116073 Upgrade to LED lighting in kids room & hallways
Meridian Energy Products 202-451 202-451-4300-301 175.00 116073 Remove 120V outlets at Rookery near entry door
WSB & Associates Inc. 202-451 202-451-4300-301 3,009.25 116097 January RAC
City of Roseville 202-451 202-451-4310-000 273.00 116041 NetMotion License - L. Lamey
CenturyLink 202-451 202-451-4321-000 68.06 116034 Phone & Internet Services
Press Publications Inc. 202-451 202-451-4340-301 256.00 116085 AFB - Rookery
Xcel Energy 202-451 202-451-4381-000 3,390.28 116098 Electric
Endurance Fitness of MN LLC 202-451 202-451-4410-000 12,500.00 116053 March 2022 EF Monthly Fee
All Seasons Rental Inc. 202-451 202-451-4415-301 747.36 116012 Scissor lift rental
202-451 Total 48,961.67
U.S. Bank 332-470 332-470-6030-000 500.00 116092 2007A Paying Agent Fee
332-470 Total 500.00
Emergency Automotive Technologies 402-420 402-420-5000-000 524.60 116052 Installed external light sensor & radar #320
402-420 Total 524.60
WSB & Associates Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-143 4,787.25 116097 January Watermark Park
WSB & Associates Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-144 3,622.00 116097 November Woods of Baldwin Lake Final Design
WSB & Associates Inc. 405-499 405-499-5000-144 5,303.25 116097 January Woods of Baldwin Lake Final Design
405-499 Total 13,712.50
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-000 1,450.25 116097 January Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-123 1,588.00 116097 January 49 & J Lift Station Sewer and Water Extension
WSB & Associates Inc. 406-499 406-499-4304-136 1,266.50 116097 January 2021 Birch Street Watermain Improvements
Northdale Construction Company Inc. 406-499 406-499-4400-123 34,771.61 116082 49 & J Lift Station Sewer & Water Extension
406-499 Total 39,076.36
Commercial Partners Title LLC 411-499 411-499-4410-000 344,000.00 116044 Lyngblomsten TIF Pooling
411-499 Total 344,000.00
WSB & Associates Inc. 420-499 420-499-4304-000 3,363.75 116097 January NE Development Master Plan
WSB & Associates Inc. 420-499 420-499-4304-141 4,643.00 116097 January Market Place Dr Realignment
420-499 Total 8,006.75
WSB & Associates Inc. 421-499 421-499-4304-137 2,621.50 116097 January 2021 Street Improvement Projects
WSB & Associates Inc. 421-499 421-499-4304-142 9,150.75 116097 January 2022 Street Rehab Project
421-499 Total 11,772.25
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 602.00 116097 January Stormwater Ordinance Update
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 8,217.50 116097 January East Region Plan - NE Drainage Area
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 542.00 116097 January East Region NE Drainage Area Wetland Delineation
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 3,102.00 116097 January Stormwater Management Utility Credits
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-000 2,503.50 116097 January Winters Wetland Bank
WSB & Associates Inc. 422-499 422-499-4304-145 3,473.00 116097 January 2022 I35E Pipe Crossing Project
422-499 Total 18,440.00
WSB & Associates Inc. 424-499 424-499-4304-000 1,024.00 116097 January 2022 Surface Water Management Project
WSB & Associates Inc. 424-499 424-499-4304-000 992.25 116097 January 2021 Surface Water Maintenance Project
Dimke Excavating Inc. 424-499 424-499-4400-000 38,321.00 116050 2021 Surface Water Maintenance Project
424-499 Total 40,337.25
Landform 484-499 484-499-4300-000 9,230.00 116068 Zoning Ordinance & Map Update
484-499 Total 9,230.00
Medica 601-494 601-494-4131-000 1,972.85 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 3.46 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 40.97 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 3.46 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 40.97 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 36.29 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 601-494 601-494-4133-000 3.14 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 601-494 601-494-4134-000 160.67 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Hach Company 601-494 601-494-4211-000 828.00 116060 Water Spectrophometer bench service & calibration
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4211-000 1,801.95 116062 Booster pump for Well #4
Menards - Forest Lake 601-494 601-494-4211-000 27.43 116072 Pro gas cylinder & flint striker
Menards - Forest Lake 601-494 601-494-4211-000 36.86 116072 Screws & plumbing supplies
Winnick Supply Inc. 601-494 601-494-4211-000 514.41 116096 Well #6 Faucet
Hach Company 601-494 601-494-4222-000 222.22 116060 Reagents for sampling
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4222-000 90.00 116062 150 LB Chlorine Cylinder
Hawkins Inc. 601-494 601-494-4222-000 5,369.89 116062 Chlorine & LPC-5
Aid Electric Corporation 601-494 601-494-4300-000 206.50 116011 Re-wire Well #4 Cholorine Booster Pump
NAC Mechanical & Electrical 601-494 601-494-4300-000 211.00 116080 Replace ignitor's and flame sensors at Well #5 & Fire Station 2
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 1,122.09 116097 January 2022 General Engineering Services
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 128.00 116097 Jan 2021 Water Service Condition Review (Hawthorn & W Shadow)
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-4304-000 309.00 116097 January 2022 Miscellaneous Escrow Account
City of Roseville 601-494 601-494-4310-000 1,781.52 116041 March IT Services
Springbrook Holding Company LLC 601-494 601-494-4345-000 268.66 116088 February Civic Pay Credit Card Fees
Safe-Fast Inc. 601-494 601-494-4370-000 30.99 116087 Uniform Allowance - T. Paulno
Connexus Energy 601-494 601-494-4381-000 733.65 116045 Electric
Xcel Energy 601-494 601-494-4381-000 6,410.62 116098 Electric
CenterPoint Energy 601-494 601-494-4383-000 571.68 116033 Natural Gas
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-5000-000 3,662.75 116097 January Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation
WSB & Associates Inc. 601-494 601-494-5000-000 753.50 116097 November Water Tower No. 2 Rehabilitation
601-494 Total 27,342.53
Medica 602-495 602-495-4131-000 1,972.84 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 3.42 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 40.93 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 40.93 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 3.42 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 36.26 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 602-495 602-495-4133-000 3.11 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 602-495 602-495-4134-000 160.67 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
Menards - Forest Lake 602-495 602-495-4211-000 27.44 116072 Pro gas cylinder & flint striker
WSB & Associates Inc. 602-495 602-495-4304-000 1,122.08 116097 January 2022 General Engineering Services
WSB & Associates Inc. 602-495 602-495-4304-146 7,505.75 116097 January 2021 East Shadow Lake Dr I&I Project
City of Roseville 602-495 602-495-4310-000 1,781.52 116041 March IT Services
Springbrook Holding Company LLC 602-495 602-495-4345-000 268.66 116088 February Civic Pay Credit Card Fees
Safe-Fast Inc. 602-495 602-495-4370-000 31.00 116087 Uniform Allowance - T. Paulno
Connexus Energy 602-495 602-495-4381-000 772.28 116045 Electric
602-495 Total 13,770.31
Grand Total 782,481.58
Xcel Energy 602-495 602-495-4381-000 2,260.83 116098 Electric
CenterPoint Energy 602-495 602-495-4383-000 131.05 116033 Natural Gas
Met Council Environmental Services 602-495 602-495-4405-000 90,644.91 116074 April Waste Water Services
602-495 Total 106,807.10
Medica 603-496 603-496-4131-000 142.68 116071 Health Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 0.88 116089 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 13.04 116089 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 13.04 116090 Disability Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 0.88 116090 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 1.01 116091 Life Insurance Premiums
Standard Insurance Company 603-496 603-496-4133-000 14.91 116091 Disability Insurance Premiums
Delta Dental of Minnesota 603-496 603-496-4134-000 13.49 116049 Dental Insurance Premiums
WSB & Associates Inc. 603-496 603-496-4304-000 1,122.08 116097 January 2022 General Engineering Services
City of Roseville 603-496 603-496-4310-000 712.61 116041 March IT Services
Springbrook Holding Company LLC 603-496 603-496-4345-000 268.68 116088 February Civic Pay Credit Card Fees
Rice Creek Watershed District 603-496 603-496-4382-000 161.57 116086 Anoka County Ditch 53-62 Water Management District Charge
603-496 Total 2,464.87
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 2,322.00 116097 January Natures Refuge M&I
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 3,005.00 116097 January NorthPointe Gardens Estates
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 172.00 116097 January MTO Properties - Thrivent Financial
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 1,466.00 116097 January Lake Amelia Woods
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 1,763.50 116097 January Belland Farms Final Plat
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 802.50 116097 January Associated Eye Care Partners
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 1,287.00 116097 January Robinson Property Concept Plan
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 2,856.00 116097 January Precision Tune
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2300-000 2,764.00 116097 January Rehbein Black Dirt
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2315-102 150.00 116097 January Nadeau Acres 2nd Addition
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2321-102 382.00 116097 January Otter Crossing
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2327-102 4,965.50 116097 January Watermark 4th Addition
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2338-102 286.00 116097 January Nadeau Acres
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2355-102 786.50 116097 January Watermark 3rd Addition
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2363-102 2,004.00 116097 January Lyngblomsten Senior Housing Site Study
Baker Tilly Municipal Advisors LLC 801-000 801-000-2363-103 3,199.58 116017 Lyngblomsten TIF
WSB & Associates Inc. 801-000 801-000-2388-102 286.00 116097 January Watermark 2nd Addition
801-000 Total 28,497.58
Grand Total 906,480.82
Electronic Funds Transfer
MN Statute 471.38 Subd. 3
Council Meeting March 14, 2022 Transfer In/(Out)
2/25/2022 Payroll Replacement Check - Berg 1,123.57
3/1/2022 HSA Bank ER Contribution (5,874.85)
HSA Bank ER Contribution (Tracy) (208.33)
HSA Bank ER Contribution (Reineke) (83.33)
3/4/2022 Council #03 Payroll (3,486.69)
3/4/2022 Council #03 Federal Deposit (202.30)
3/4/2022 Council #03 PERA (387.16)
3/4/2022 Council #03 State (45.08)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 (152,814.38)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 Federal Deposit (47,288.63)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 PERA (49,009.16)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 State (10,773.85)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 Child Support (284.77)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 H.S.A. Bank Pretax (4,205.22)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 TASC Pretax (901.16)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 ICMA 457 Def. Comp #301596 (10,081.00)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 ICMA Roth IRA #706155 (905.75)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 MSRS HCSP #98946-01 (2,748.02)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 MSRS Def. Comp #98945-01 (4,987.00)
3/4/2022 Payroll #05 MSRS Roth IRA #98945-01 (765.00)
3/4/2022 Wire from MCM - ARPA Account 1,208,794.71
3/15/2022 Building Permit Surcharge (1,763.87)
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : February 28, 2022 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 6:20 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Lyden, Ruhland, 7
Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : Councilmember Stoesz 9
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Community Development 10
Director Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Director of Public Safety John 11
Swenson; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Clerk Julie Bartell 12
1. Review Regular Agenda – 13
14
Expenditures – Mayor Rafferty noted the general sprinkler five year inspection costs. 15
He explained that this is a regular inspection to make sure operations are appropriate. 16
17
Mayor Rafferty noted the Marsden charges for The Rookery and that they are necessary 18
because of Endurance Fitness operating in the building now. He noted that there is some 19
interest in joining the custodial services for The Rookery and other City facilities 20
(currently provided by Marsden). Administrator Cotton explained that the ultimate goal 21
is to have in house services if that is possible when hiring at the Rookery is complete. 22
23
Item 1D – Peltier Lake LLC, NE Drainage Project – Community Development Director 24
Grochala recalled the project and the need for land acquisitions and court involvement. 25
He noted the settlement amount. Mayor Rafferty remarked that the project also provides 26
drainage for the Watermark development. 27
28
Item 6A – Precision Tune – City Planner Larsen explained that the business owners are 29
interested in moving from their current space to a new stand-alone auto services facility to 30
be developed on Lake Drive. 31
32
Councilmember Lyden remarked that this will cost a lot and he wonders about the 33
motive. The business owner was present and indicated that they would like to develop 34
more business; also he is ready to move away from his current rental situation. 35
36
Councilmember Cavegn remarked that there was one nay vote at the Planning and Zoning 37
review. Ms. Larsen explained that there were a few design changes called for at that 38
time and that have since occurred. 39
40
Item 6B – Memo of Understanding with VLAWMO, Lake Amelia – Community 41
Development Director Grochala noted a private ditch that is experiencing some back up; 42
private crossings are involved. The ditch feeds into Lake Amelia thus requiring some 43
improvement prior to move in. He reviewed the purpose and what is included in the 44
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
2
agreement. Bids were sought and WSB & Associates did come through with the best bid; 45
VLAWMO has approved of the agreement as well as the City’s Environmental Board. 46
2. Adjourn 47
48
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20p.m. 49
50
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 51
March 14, 2022. 52
53
54
55
56
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 57
58
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
1
1
LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL 2
REGULAR MEETING 3
MINUTES 4
5
DATE : February 28, 2022 6
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 7
TIME ENDED : 7:00 p.m. 8
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Lyden, 9
Ruhland, Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 10
MEMBERS ABSENT : Councilmember Stoesz 11
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Community Development Director 12
Michael Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; City Clerk 13
Julie Bartell 14
15
PUBLIC COMMENT 16
Aaron Sherer, 7132 Grey Heron Drive, noted a problem that occurs on his block around 3:00 p.m. 17
every school day. Parents picking up middle schoolers are lining the street and causing some 18
issues. 19
SETTING THE AGENDA 20
The agenda was approved as presented. 21
SPECIAL PRESENTATION 22
Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Eagle Scout CJ Sherer – Mayor Rafferty and Anoka 23
County Commissioner Jeff Reinert honored Mr. Sherer with comments and certificates. 24
CONSENT AGENDA 25
Councilmember Ruhland moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1G as 26
presented. Councilmember Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 27
28
ITEM ACTION 29
Consideration of Expenditures: 30
A) February 28, 2022 (Check No. 115921 through 116004) in the 31
Amount of $380,084.89 Approved 32
B) Consider Approval of February 14, 2022 Council 33
Work Session Minutes Approved 34
C) Consider Approval of February 14, 2022 Council 35
Minutes Approved 36
D) Consider Resolution No. 22-28, Approving Settlement Agreement 37
with Peltier Lake LLC, NE Lino Drainage Area Improvement 38
Project Approved 39
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
2
E) Consider Approval of Resolution 22-26, Individual Massage 40
License for Melissa Olson, Lyssa’s Whole Life Wellness, 41
Wellness Circle Approved 42
F) Consider Approval of February 7, 2022 Work Session Minutes Approved 43
G) Consider Approval of Rookery Activity Center Expenditures Approved 44
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 45
There was no report from the Finance Department. 46
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 47
There was no report from the Administration Department. 48
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 49
There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 50
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 51
There was no report from the Public Services Department. 52
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 53
6A) Precision Tune Auto Care (7910 Lake Drive): i. Consider Resolution No. 22-01 54
Approving Conditional Use Permit; and ii. Consider Resolution No. 22-02 Approving Site 55
Improvement Performance Agreement – City Planner Larsen reviewed a PowerPoint presentation 56
that included information on the following: 57
- Land Use Application- new facility (relocation in City) at 7910 Lake Drive; 58
- Site Location and Aerial Map; 59
- Site Plan – setbacks, trash enclosure, parking stalls; 60
- Architectural Plan; 61
- Floor Plan; 62
- Stormwater and Drainage Plan; 63
- Landscape Plan; 64
- Planning & Zoning Board approval; 65
- Requested counci action including Findings of Fact. 66
Councilmember Ruhland asked about the adjacent residential property mentioned. Ms. Larsen pointed 67
out one property on the site map; screening for that area is planned. When additional development 68
comes to the area, additional screening will be discussed. 69
70
Councilmember Lyden asked about the one dissenting vote from the Planning and Zoning Board. Ms. 71
Larsen explained that there have been changes from the original architectural plans and the vote 72
reflected a concern about the original plan. 73
74
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
3
Councilmember Lyden asked why not have all the bay doors facing the south for winter use; the 75
applicant explained that experience has proven that doors on both sides provides good ventilation. 76
Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 22-01 and Resolution No. 22-02 as 77
presented. Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 78
6B) Consider Resolution No. 22-29, Approving Memorandum of Understanding with 79
VLAWMO, Lake Ameila Subwatershed Management Plan – Community Development Director 80
Grochala noted that the resolution would approve an agreement related to plans for water management 81
from a private ditch. He noted that the MOU has been approved by the City’s Environmental Board 82
and VLAWMO. 83
Mayor Rafferty noted his involvement on the VLAWMO Board for many years; he’s glad to see 84
projects coming forward. 85
Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 22-29 as presented. Councilmember 86
Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 87
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 88
There was no Unfinished Business. 89
90
NEW BUSINESS 91
There was no New Business. 92
93
COMMUNITY EVENTS 94
There were no events announced. 95
COMMUNITY CALENDAR 96
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 97
February 28, 2022 through March 14, 2022 98
Thursday, March 3 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 99
Monday, March 7 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 100
Monday, March 14 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 101
Monday, March 14 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 102
103
ADJOURN 104
105
There being no further business, Councilmember Ruhland moved to adjourn at 7:00 p.m. 106
Councilmember Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 107
108
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on March 14, 2022. 109
110
111
112
113
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 114
115
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Julie Bartell, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 22-27, Reestablishing Precincts and
Polling Locations
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 vote)
INTRODUCTION
Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of election districts after completion of
the decennial Census. The purpose of redistricting is to ensure that people are equally
represented.
Municipalities can be impacted by the redrawing of lines because legislative boundaries (state
and federal) can change and municipal voting precincts boundaries must coincide with those
lines.
The Special Redistricting Panel appointed by the Minnesota Supreme Court released a
redistricting plan/map in February. In effect, the plan includes no impact to Lino Lakes’
congressional and legislative voting districts. The City remains in the 6th District (Congress)
and is fully included in one state legislative district now numbered as 36(A).
BACKGROUND
Municipalities are required to review voting districts after redistricting and prior to March 28th.
Staff is presenting a resolution reestablishing municipal precinct lines and polling places for
Lino Lakes, including the precinct line change requested by the council at the January 24th
work session.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 22-27.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2022 Voting Precinct Map with Polling Locations
2. Resolution No. 22-27
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
S±
S±
SÓ
¬«34
¬«14
¬«23
¬«21
¬«23
¬«49
¬«32
¬«34 ¬«54
¬«54
¬«1
¬«12
¬«14
¬«14
PELTIER LAKE
RICE LAKE
CENTERVILLE LAKE
GEORGE WATCH LAKE
RESHANAU LAKE
MARSHAN LAKE
BALDWIN LAKE
OTTER LAKE
RONDEAU LAKE
AMELIA LAKE
WARDS LAKE
UNNAMED
SHERMAN LAKE
UNNAMED
UNNAMED
Lino Lakes P-1
Senior Center
Lino Lakes P-4
City Hall
Lino Lakes P-6
Fire Station No. 1
Lino Lakes P-2
Fire Station No. 1
Lino Lakes P-7
Living Waters Church
Lino Lakes P-5
Rice Creek
Covenant Church
Lino Lakes P-3
St. Joseph's Chruch
!Polling Places
Road Centerlines
Lakes
Precincts
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
:
City of Lino Lakes
2022 Redistricting
02/17/22
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-27
REESTABLISHING PRECINCT LINES AND POLLING PLACES
WHEREAS, the legislature of the State of Minnesota has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute section 204B.14, subd. 3(d) requires that precinct boundaries
must be reestablished within 60 days of when the legislature has been redistricted or at least 19
weeks before the state primary election, whichever comes first;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
State of Minnesota hereby reestablishes the boundaries of the voting precincts and polling places
as follows:
Precinct 1 (Lino Lakes Senior Center, 1189 Main Street)
That part of the City lying south on 4th Avenue from Pine Street on the north to Main Street on
the south, east on Main Street to Lake Drive, south on Lake Drive to I-35W, northeast on I-35W
to Main Street, south on Main Street to Centerville boundary, follow Centerville boundary east
and south to Main Street, east on Main Street to 24th Avenue, our eastern boundary, north on 24th
Avenue to northern boundary, west on northern boundary to 4th Avenue.
Precinct 2 (Lino Lakes Fire Station No. 1, 7741 Lake Drive)
That part of the City lying south on 4th Avenue from Pine Street on the north to Main Street on
the south, east on Main Street to Lake Drive, south on Lake Drive to the eastern extension of
Lilac Street, west on the eastern extension of Lilac Street to Apollo Drive, south and west on
Apollo Drive to Sunset Road, north on Sunset Road to northern boundary, east on northern
boundary to 4th Avenue.
Precinct 3 (St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street)
That part of the City lying east and north on Apollo Drive from Sunset Avenue to Lilac Street,
east on Lilac Street extending to the center of Lake Drive, southwest on Lake Drive to the north
City boundary, west to North Road, west on North Road to Sunset Avenue, north on Sunset
Avenue to Apollo Drive.
Precinct 4 (Lino Lakes City Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway)
That part of the City lying north on Lake Drive from Hodgson Road to I-35W, northeast on 1-
35W to Main Street, south on Main Street to Centerville boundary, follow Centerville boundary
west and south, continue east on Centerville’s southern boundary to 20th Avenue, south on 20th
Avenue to Birch Street, west on Birch Street to the easterly boundary of St. Clair Estates plat to
its northwest terminus then southwesterly on the western boundary of the Spirit Hills plat to
Hodgson Road, northwest on Hodgson Road to Lake Drive.
Precinct 5 (Rice Creek Covenant Church, 125 Ash Street)
That part of the City lying north on Ware Road from Ash Street on the south to Birch Street, east
on Birch Street to the easterly boundary of St. Clair Estates plat to its northwest terminus then
southwesterly on the western boundary of the Spirit Hills plat to Hodgson Road, northwest on
Hodgson Road to Lake Drive, southwest on Lake Drive to city boundary, south on western
boundary to the northern shore of Baldwin Lake to western boundary, south on western boundary
to Ash Street, east on Ash Street to Ware Road.
Precinct 6 (Lino Lakes Fire Station No. 2, 1710 Birch Street)
That part of the City lying south on 12th Avenue from Birch Street to Holly Drive, west and then
south on Holly Drive to Ash Street, our southern boundary, east on our southern boundary to our
eastern boundary, north on our eastern boundary to Main Street, west on Main Street to 21st
Avenue, our boundary street with Centerville, follow Centerville boundary south to Cedar Street,
west on Cedar Street to 20th Avenue, south on 20th Avenue to Birch Street, west on Birch Street
to 12th Avenue.
Precinct 7 (Living Waters Lutheran Church, 865 Birch Street)
That part of the City lying south on Ware Road from Birch Street on the north to Ash Street, east
on Ash Street to Holly Drive, Holly Drive north and east to 12th Avenue, north on 12th Avenue to
Birch Street, west on Birch Street to Ware Road.
Attached to this resolution, for illustrative purposes, is a map showing said precincts and the
location of each polling place.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember
Cavegn and was duly seconded by Councilmember Ruhland and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof: Cavegn, Ruhland, Lyden, Stoesz, Rafferty
The following voted against same: None
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 22-32, Accepting Water
Treatment Pilot Study
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting council acceptance of the Water Treatment Pilot Study.
BACKGROUND
In 2019, the Minnesota Department of Health tested the City’s manganese levels in each of the
City’s wells as part of the EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 4 (UCMR4). The
water quality testing data from MDH indicated that five of the City’s six wells exceed the
maximum recommended manganese level for infants, and three of the wells exceeds the
maximum recommend level for adults and children.
A Water Treatment Plant feasibility study was completed in June of 2020 to evaluate options for
addressing the manganese issue. A Utility Rate study, evaluating funding for the improvement,
was completed by Baker Tilly and accepted by the City Council on May 10, 2021.
On June 14, 2021, the City Council authorized WSB to complete the Water Treatment Pilot
Study to verify the effectiveness of biological filtration to remove manganese, iron, and ammonia
from the City’s well water. The purpose of the study was to provide the City with critical
information required to design and size a water treatment plant to address the manganese and
iron levels in its drinking water.
The attached report recommends construction of a conventional gravity filtration system using
biological filtration with an initial treatment capacity of 6,000 gallons per minute (gpm).
Biological filtration is promoted by the Minnesota Department of Health and is currently being
used by the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, St. Cloud, and other communities in Minnesota to
effectively treat their drinking water. Biological filtration could potentially save the City almost
$1 million in chemical costs and save millions of gallons of water over the first 20 years of plant
operation.
With the completion of the Pilot Study the City is in a position to move forward with design of
the Water Treatment Plant should the City Council decide to do so. Staff is planning to bring
forth discussion on next steps at the April 4, 2022 work session.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 22-32 Accepting Water Treatment Pilot
Study.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 22-32
2. Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-32
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WATER TREATMENT PILOT STUDY
WHEREAS, the City Council is evaluating the construction of a Water Treatment Plant to
reduce manganese, iron, and ammonia from the City’s well water, and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2021 the City Council authorized a Water Treatment Pilot Study, and
WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, has completed the Water Treatment Pilot
Study and is on file at the City of Lino Lakes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
the Water Treatment Pilot Study is hereby accepted.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
WATER TREATMENT PILOT
STUDY REPORT
BIOLOGICAL REMOVAL OF AMMONIA,
IRON, AND MAGANESE
CITY OF LINO LAKES | ANOKA COUNTY | MINNESOTA
February 28, 2022
Prepared for:
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway,
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
WSB PROJECT NO. 018601-000
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000
WATER TREATMENT PILOT STUDY REPORT
BIOLOGICAL REMOVAL OF AMMONIA, IRON AND MANGANESE
AT WELL HOUSE NO. 6
FOR THE
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
February 28, 2022
Prepared By:
February 28, 2022
Mr. Justin Williams
Public Works Superintendent
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000
Dear Mr. Williams:
WSB is pleased to provide you with this pilot study report for the biological r emoval of ammonia,
iron, and manganese completed at the Lino Lakes’ Well House No. 6. The assistance provided by
city staff during the pilot study contributed to the success of the study. Staff’s knowledge of the raw
water quality conditions and commitment to conducting water testing throughout the study was
extremely helpful.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Lino Lakes and we look forward to
assisting you when this project proceeds to the next phase. Please feel free to contact us if you
have any questions or if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
WSB
Greg F. Johnson, PE
Director of Water/Wastewater
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Greg F. Johnson, PE
Date: February 28, 2022 License No. 26430
Ursinio Puga, PE
Date: February 28, 2022 License No. 59303
Ray Theiler, PE
Date: February 28, 2022 License No. 57772
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2
1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................ 2
1.1 Effects of Iron ..................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Effects of Manganese ........................................................................................ 2
1.3 Effects of Ammonia ............................................................................................ 3
1.4 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 3
2. RAW WATER QUALITY AND TREATMENT GOALS ............................................... 4
2.1 City-Wide Raw Water Quality ............................................................................. 4
2.2 Well 6 Raw Water Quality and Treatment Objectives ......................................... 4
3. PILOT EQUIPMENT AND SETUP ............................................................................. 5
4. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW ..................................................................................... 6
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................... 7
5.1 Aeration Requirements ...................................................................................... 7
5.2 Iron Removal ...................................................................................................... 8
5.3 Manganese Removal ......................................................................................... 8
5.4 Ammonia Removal ............................................................................................. 9
5.5 Nutrient Requirements ..................................................................................... 10
5.6 Miscellaneous Water Quality Parameters ........................................................ 11
5.7 Filter Backwash Frequency .............................................................................. 11
5.8 Filter Performance Testing ............................................................................... 13
5.8.1 Backwash Recovery Test ...................................................................... 13
5.8.2 Shutdown Recovery Test ...................................................................... 13
6. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 15
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION ........................................................... 16
7.1 Performance Takeaways.................................................................................. 16
7.2 Financial Takeaways ........................................................................................ 16
7.3 Recommendation ............................................................................................. 16
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Lino Lakes completed a Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study in 2020 that recommended
conducting a water treatment pilot study to test the effectiveness of biological filtration to remov e
manganese from the City’s drinking water. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) considers biological
filtration to be an efficient and effective treatment method remove a wide variety of contaminants including
manganese, ammonia, and iron.
WSB’s pilot trailer was mobilized to Well House No. 6 towards the end of September 2021 to start a
biological filtration pilot study that ended on November 26, 2021. WSB’s pilot skid tested two types of filter
media to identify the best media type to remove manganese biologically. Although both media types had
similar removal performance, gravity filters with silica sand and anthracite filter media are recommended
for the proposed water treatment plant since the silica sand filter had a lower rate of headloss than the
greensand filter and silica sand media is less expensive. The silica sand filter column also showed faster
performance recovery in the backwash and shutdown recovery tests. The silica sand filter produced treated
water with an average iron concentration of 0.02 mg/L, an average manganese concentration of 0.040
mg/L, and an average ammonia concentration of 0.02 mg/L, all of which are below the target treatment
goals set for this pilot study. In addition to achieving excellent removal performance, the silica sand filter
column achieved filter run times longer than one week before filter backwashing was required, which is
exceptional for water filtration.
Implementing biological filtration at the proposed water treatment plant will eliminate the need to
prechlorinate the water and to feed sodium or potassium permanganate to oxidize iron, ammonia, and
manganese. These chemicals are required in conventional filtration facilities and are costly to feed. The
reduction in chemical usage is projected to generate approximately $950,000 in operational savings over
the next 20 years when compared to a conventional filtration facility in Lino Lakes. In addition to generating
operational savings, utilizing fewer chemicals produces less processed and more sustainable water.
Based on the treatment results obtained in this pilot study and the projected operational savings, it is
recommended to design and construct a gravity filtration water treatment plant that utilizes biological
filtration to remove manganese in Lino Lakes. Data collected in this pilot study will aid in the design of the
future facility.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 2
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of Study
WSB was authorized to complete this water treatment pilot study as the first step to verify the effectiveness
of a full-scale gravity biological filtration water treatment plant to remove ammonia, iron, and manganese
from the City’s water. Conducting this pilot study was recommended in the City’s Water Treatment Plant
Feasibility Study completed in June 2020.
The MDH considers biological filtration to be an efficient and effective treatment method to remove
ammonia, iron, manganese, and other contaminants in public drinking water supplies. The purpose of the
pilot study is to provide the City with critical information that is required to design and construct a water
treatment plant if the City decides to address the high manganese levels in its drinking water. It was decided
to conduct the pilot study with groundwater pumped by Well 6 because it contains the highest levels of
manganese and iron in comparison to the City’s other wells.
1.1 Effects of Iron
Iron in drinking water is regulated by the Secondary Drinking Water Standards (SDWS) set by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Unlike with the Primary Drinking Wat er Standards, the SDWS are
not enforced since they are not considered to be a health risk. The SDWS are guidelines to assist public
water systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations. The SDWS for iron is 0.30
mg/L. Iron concentrations above the SDWS can stain household fixtures and clothing, cause water
discoloration, coat pipes within water distribution systems, and cause unpleasant taste and odors.
Dissolved iron can be treated by oxidizing it to its insoluble form and removing it by filtration. Iron is usually
oxidized with aeration, chlorine, or a combination of the two.
1.2 Effects of Manganese
Manganese is a common, naturally occurring mineral found in rocks, soil, groundwater, and surface water.
The SDWS include a recommended limit for manganese since manganese causes physical and aesthetic
effects on drinking water such as staining, taste, and color. Manganese in water can stain laundry, cause
scaling on plumbing, and cause water to look, smell, or taste bad. Additionally, manganese can create a
brownish-black or black stain on toilets, showers, bathtubs, and sinks. The SDWS recommended limit for
manganese in drinking water is 0.05 mg/L.
The EPA is in the process of determining if a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) should be established
for manganese due to updated research on its health effects. As such, the EPA included manganese in the
Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR4), which requires all public drinking water
systems serving over 10,000 people and randomly selected small systems to monitor for manganese. The
EPA will also consider the health effects of manganese in their regulatory determination and evaluate
potential risks to adults, children, and infants.
The MDH, in conjunction with studies conducted by others, has determined that children and adults who
drink water with high levels of manganese for an extended period of time may experience problems with
memory, attention, and motor skills. These side effects are more acute in infant s (babies under the age of
one), as they may result in long term learning and behavioral problems. Therefore, the MDH has established
a maximum recommended manganese concentration in drinking water of 0.10 mg/L for infants and 0.30
mg/L for adults and children.
Similar to iron, dissolved manganese can be treated in drinking water by oxidizing it to its insoluble form
and removing it by filtration. Manganese is usually oxidized with potassium or sodium permanganate.
However, manganese can also be removed biologically from w ater using naturally occurring
microorganisms.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 3
1.3 Effects of Ammonia
Many groundwater sources throughout the United States have elevated levels of ammonia due to natural
processes, agricultural runoff or animal feeding operations. Although ammonia is not currently regulated by
the EPA, elevated levels of ammonia will pose operational and health concerns if nitrification takes place
in the distribution system. Nitrification is the conversion of ammonia to nitrite and nitrate, which can lead to
potential corrosion issues, taste and odor concerns, and ultimately, elevated nitrite and nitrate levels
throughout the distribution system. Nitrite and nitrate are regulated under the PDWS since they are known
to have significant effects on human health.
Ammonia is typically treated with the formation of monochloramine and breakpoint chlorination, which
results in the removal of ammonia by a chemical reaction with chlorine. Other conventional methods to treat
ammonia include advanced oxidation, air stripping, or reverse osmosis. Similar to treating manganese,
ammonia can be removed from water biologically. Biological ammonia removal relies on naturally occurring
microorganisms to convert ammonia to nitrite and nitrate. Biological ammonia removal at the treatment
plant eliminates the likelihood of nitrification taking place in the distribution system and potentially lowers
the chlorine dosages needed to maintain adequate free chlorine residuals in the treated water.
1.4 Goals and Objectives
The main objective of this pilot study is to evaluate whether ammonia, iron and manganese can be removed
biologically without the use of prechlorination and potassium or sodium permanganate. Another main
objective of this study is to obtain data that can be used to design, construct, and operate a gravity filtration
water treatment plant utilizing biological filtration in Lino Lakes.
The specific goals of this pilot study are described below:
1. Evaluate if biological filtration can meet the treatment goals set in this study;
2. Compare the biological filtration efficiency of various types of filter media;
3. Evaluate the duration of the biological acclimation process;
4. Evaluate the dissolved oxygen concentration needed to enhance biological filtration;
5. Establish a backwash procedure that effectively cleans the biological filters;
6. Evaluate the filter runtime of each filter media type;
7. Determine if nutrients are needed to enhance the performance of biological filtration;
8. Evaluate whether microorganisms remain effective in colder water temperatures;
9. Evaluate the performance of the biological filters following a backwash; and
10. Evaluate the performance of the biological filters following a period of shutdown.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 4
2. RAW WATER QUALITY AND TREATMENT GOALS
2.1 City-Wide Raw Water Quality
The raw water pumped from each municipal well in the City of Lino Lakes was tested as part of the Water
Treatment Plant Feasibility Study completed in 2020. A summary of the raw water manganese, iron, and
ammonia concentrations in each well are shown in Table 2-1. Well 6 was used to conduct the pilot study
due to its high combined concentrations of iron and manganese.
Table 2-1. Existing Water Supply
Well
Name
Total Iron
(mg/L)
Dissolved
Iron (mg/L)
Total Manganese
(mg/L)
Dissolved
Manganese (mg/L)
Ammonia
(mg/L)
Well 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Well 2 0.181 0.323 0.249 0.256 ND
Well 3 ND ND 0.383 0.395 0.28
Well 4 0.105 0.084 0.086 0.093 0.21
Well 5 0.310 0.290 0.152 0.151 0.14
Well 6 0.050 ND 0.376 0.357 0.21
N/A – Not Applicable; ND – Non-Detect
2.2 Well 6 Raw Water Quality and Treatment Objectives
The raw water quality measured during the pilot study is presented in Table 2-2. Also shown in Table 2-2
are the target effluent or treatment goal concentrations for the pilot study.
Table 2-2. Raw Water Quality
Parameter Unit Raw Water Quality Target Effluent
Concentration Average Range
Total Iron mg/L 0.05 0.00 – 0.17 < 0.30
Total Manganese mg/L 0.410 0.40 – 0.45 < 0.050
Ammonia-N mg/L 0.35 0.30 – 0.40 < 0.10
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) mg/L 1.60 0.71 – 3.20 > 4.0
Orthophosphate mg/L 0.13 0.07 – 0.23 N/A
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/L 2.6 1.6 – 3.5 N/A
Alkalinity mg/L CaCO3 254 252 – 255 N/A
pH SU 7.03 6.4 – 7.9 7.0 – 8.0
Temperature Degrees F 51.6 50.2 – 53.4 N/A
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 5
3. PILOT EQUIPMENT AND SETUP
A small portion of the groundwater pumped by Well 6 was routed to WSB’s pilot skid for treatment, which
was located inside the pilot trailer parked next to Well House No. 6. The treatment equipment used in the
pilot skid is described below.
Detention Basin: The first treatment unit of the pilot skid was a detention basin. Compressed air
was introduced upstream of the detention basin at various flow rates to increase the dissolved
oxygen (DO) concentration of the raw water to promote biological growth. A 30-minute detention
time was targeted in the detention basin.
Transfer Pump: The transfer pump was located downstream of the detention basin and was used
to pump water from the detention basin into the filter columns. A pressure reducing valve (PRV)
was installed downstream of the pump to maintain an optimal water pressure upstream of the filter
columns.
Media Filters: Two 6-inch diameter filter columns were operated in parallel and downstream of the
transfer pump. The filter media in Filter 1 consisted of 18 inches of silica sand and 12 inches of
anthracite, and the filter media in Filter 2 consisted of 18 inches of greensand and 12 inches of
anthracite. Both filters had an underdrain system with reverse graded gravel and torpedo sand.
Treated water from each filter was discharged near Well House No. 6.
Other Equipment: The pilot plant was equipped with flowmeters (air and water), a flow totalizer,
pressure gauges, sample taps, an air compressor, and a HACH DR900 colorimeter to test water
quality.
A flow schematic and photo of WSB’s pilot trailer are shown below.
Figure 3-1. WSB’s Pilot Trailer at Lino Lakes’ Well House No. 6
Well 6 Raw
Water
Detention
Basin
Transfer
Pump
Filter 1
Filter 2
Filter 1
Effluent
Filter 2
Effluent
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 6
4. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW
Influent flow to the pilot skid was maintained at 1.2 gallons per minute (GPM). From there, water was
pumped into each filter at a flow rate of 0.6 GPM per filter to achieve a filter loading rate of 3.0 GPM per
square foot (SF) of filter media per recommended Ten States Standards. The above water flow rates
achieved a 30-minute detention time in the detention basin and an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 6.2
minutes in each filter column. The filters were backwashed with raw water when a terminal headloss of 120
inches was achieved.
Following set up and staff training, this pilot study was conducted in tw o operational phases, the microbial
acclimation phase and the treatment efficiency phase. The microbial acclimation phase consisted of
adjusting the aeration flow rate to promote rapid biological growth. Nutrients were not required in this pilot
study as it was determined that the natural orthophosphate concentration in the raw water was sufficient to
promote biological filtration. The second phase of the study (treatment efficiency phase) started when the
filters were fully acclimated and removing the majority of the manganese. Towards the end of this phase,
biological filter performance was measured following a backwash and a 1-week shutdown period.
Regardless of the operational phase, day to day monitoring procedures and water quality sampling
remained the same throughout the study. Daily operations included monitoring the flow rates (air and water)
and water pressure. Water quality sampling consisted of testing the water at various treatment stages
throughout the pilot skid. The majority of the water qu ality sampling and testing was completed on site by
City staff with some samples being shipped to a certified laboratory for testing and QA/QC purposes. City
staff were also responsible for daily monitoring of the pilot skid.
Filter backwashing was accomplished using a combination of air and raw water. The duration of the entire
backwash was approximately 12 to 15 minutes (for each filter). After draining the filter columns for about a
minute, air was introduced through the underdrain system for 5 minutes. The air scouring loading rate was
maintained at 2 cubic feet per minute per square foot of filter media (CFM/SF) for the first 3 minutes and
then increased to 3 CFM/SF for the following 2 minutes. After the initial 5 minutes of air scouring, a
simultaneous air and water backwash took place for 2 minutes. During that time, the air scouring loading
rate was reduced to 1 CFM/SF and the water loading rate was maintained at 8 GPM/SF. Following the
simultaneous backwash, the filter columns were backwashed with water for a period of 4 minutes. During
the water-only backwash, the water loading rate was varied from 8 GPM/SF to 15 GPM/SF. The backwash
water flow was stopped when the filter media achieved 50-percent stratification for approximately 1 minute.
Following the backwash, the media was allowed to settle for a short period (3 to 5 minutes) to ensure that
no media was lost when normal filter operation resumed. This backwashing strategy was effective removing
particle clusters without losing a significant quantity of microorganisms. WSB staff conducted all
backwashes.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 7
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The pilot study was conducted for nine weeks beginning on September 22, 2021 and ending on November
26, 2021. The microbial acclimation phase took place over the initial three weeks and the treatment
efficiency phase continued until the study was completed. A backwash recovery test was completed during
the eighth week and a 1-week shutdown test took place during the last week of the study. Individual
treatment results are summarized in the following sections.
5.1 Aeration Requirements
Atmospheric air was fed upstream of the detention basin to promote biological growth in the filter columns
and to oxidize the dissolved iron present in the raw water. The air flow rate was optimized during the
microbial acclimation phase with the goal of maintaining a pre-filtration DO concentration of 6 to 8 mg/L and
a post-filtration DO concentration above 4 mg/L. The final air flowrate used in this study was 0.50 CFM,
which generated an air flow and water flow rate relationship of approximately 0.40 CFM/GPM (concurrent
air and water flow). It is possible that a full-scale biological filtration facility in Lino Lakes will require a lower
air to water flow rate ratio than used in this study to effectively treat ammonia, iron, and manganese. The
DO concentration change through the pilot skid is shown in Figure 5-1. As shown in the figure below, the
raw water DO concentration increased from an average of 1.6 mg/L to an average of 6.7 mg/L after aeration
and then decreased to an average of 5.9 mg/L after filtration. Both biological filters consumed a similar
amount of DO regardless of the media type.
Figure 5-1. DO Concentration Change in the Pilot Skid
The DO consumed by the filters increased significantly during the treatment efficiency phase when
compared to the acclimation phase due to the larger microorganism population in the filters at that time.
Table 5-1 below summarizes the average DO consumed by the filters during both phases of the study.
Table 5-1. Changes to DO Consumption
Phase Avg. DO Consumption
Filter 1 Filter 2
Acclimation 7% 3%
Treatment Efficiency 14% 13%
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
09/22/21 09/29/21 10/06/21 10/13/21 10/21/21 10/28/21 11/04/21 11/11/21 11/19/21Concentration (mg/L)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Raw Influent Post-Detention Filter 1 Effluent Filter 2 Effluent
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 8
5.2 Iron Removal
The iron removal results obtained in this pilot study are shown in Figure 5-2. The figure below shows the
raw water iron concentration, the effluent iron concentration (Filter 1 and Filter 2), and the effluent target
iron concentration. The iron concentration in the water was reduced from an average of 0.05 mg/L to an
average of 0.02 mg/L. Both biological filters produced similar effluent iron concentrations throughout the
pilot study. The average filter effluent concentration is approximately 93-percent below the EPA SDWS for
iron.
Figure 5-2. Biological Iron Removal
The iron removed by the filters increased during the treatment efficiency phase when compared to the
acclimation phase. Although Filter 2 had a better removal performance than Filter 1, the difference in
effluent iron concentration between the two filters during the treatment efficiency phase was only 0.01 mg/L.
Table 5-2 below summarizes the average iron removed by the filters during both phases of the study.
Table 5-2. Iron Removal Efficiency
Phase Avg. Iron Removal
Filter 1 Filter 2
Acclimation 24% 32%
Treatment Efficiency 63% 82%
5.3 Manganese Removal
The manganese removal results obtained in this pilot study are shown in Figure 5-3. The figure below
shows the raw water manganese concentration, the effluent manganese concentration (Filter 1 and Filter
2), and the effluent target manganese concentration. The manganese concentration in the water was
reduced from an average of 0.410 mg/L to an average of 0.040 mg/L in Filter 1 and 0.023 mg/L in Filter 2
during the treatment efficiency phase. Although Filter 2 produced water with lower manganese
concentrations, the effluent manganese concentrations from both filters were almost identical towards the
end of the study. All effluent manganese concentrations during the treatment efficiency phase were below
EPA’s SDWS for manganese and the MDH’s guidance values of 0.10 mg/L for infants and 0.30 mg/L for
children and adults.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
09/22/21 09/29/21 10/06/21 10/13/21 10/21/21 10/28/21 11/04/21 11/11/21 11/19/21Concentration (mg/L)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Raw Influent Filter 1 Effluent Filter 2 Effluent Effluent Target Conc.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 9
Figure 5-3. Biological Manganese Removal
Similar to the iron removal results, the manganese removed by the filters increased significantly during the
treatment efficiency phase when compared to the acclimation phase. Filter 1 performed significantly better
during the acclimation phase, but Filter 2 ended up removing slightly more manganese than Filter 1 towards
the end of the study. Table 5-3 below summarizes the average manganese removed by the filters during
both phases of the study.
Table 5-3. Manganese Removal Efficiency
Phase Avg. Manganese Removal
Filter 1 Filter 2
Acclimation 43% 26%
Treatment Efficiency 91% 95%
5.4 Ammonia Removal
The ammonia removal results obtained in this pilot study are shown in Figure 5-4. The figure below shows
the raw water ammonia concentration, the effluent ammonia concentration (Filter 1 and Filter 2), and the
effluent target ammonia concentration. The filters’ effluent ammonia concentrations were almost identical
towards the end of the study and all effluent ammonia concentrations during the treatment efficiency phase
were below the target effluent concentration of 0.10 mg/L. It should be noted that the raw water ammonia
concentration in Well 6 was higher than expected when compared to the water quality testing completed in
2020 as part of the City’s Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study (see Table 2-1 for the 2020 sampling
results).
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
09/22/21 09/29/21 10/06/21 10/13/21 10/21/21 10/28/21 11/04/21 11/11/21 11/19/21Concentration (mg/L)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Raw Influent Filter 1 Effluent Filter 2 Effluent Effluent Target Conc.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 10
Figure 5-4. Biological Ammonia Removal
Ammonia is removed biologically from the water u sing a two-step process called nitrification. First,
Nitrosomonas microorganisms convert ammonia to nitrite, then Nitrobacter microorganisms convert nitrite
into nitrate. The effluent nitrite concentrations increase during the first step of nitrification until the
Nitrobacter microorganisms are acclimated, which usually takes 2 to 3 weeks. Due to the expected low
concentration of ammonia in the raw water, the MDH did not require monitoring for nitrite or nitrate in Lino
Lakes’ study. However, since the raw water ammonia was over 0.20 mg/L, randomized testing was
completed for nitrite and nitrate by WSB staff to monitor the effluent concentrations. Effluent nitrite and
nitrate concentrations were maintained below 0.30 mg/L and around 1 mg/L, respectively, which is
significantly below the MLC established by the EPA for each contaminant. Towards the end of the study,
the nitrite concentrations were reduced to near zero and almost all the ammonia was converted to nitrate.
Filter 1 performed significantly better than Filter 2 during the acclimation phase. However, both filters
achieved similar levels of performance towards the end of the study during the treatment efficiency phase.
Table 5-4 below summarizes the average ammonia removed by the filters during both phases of the study.
Table 5-4. Ammonia Removal Efficiency
Phase Avg. Ammonia Removal
Filter 1 Filter 2
Acclimation 50% 37%
Treatment Efficiency 94% 93%
5.5 Nutrient Requirements
Orthophosphate is a form of phosphorus that is dissolved in the water. Because it is dissolved, it is
immediately available to be consumed by microorganisms for growth. Since orthophosphate is consumed
by the microorganisms, it is important to maintain an adequate conce ntration upstream of the filters. The
natural raw water orthophosphate concentration from Well 6 averaged 0.13 mg/L. This concentration was
sufficient to promote rapid biological growth, so additional nutrients were not required during the pilot study.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
09/22/21 09/29/21 10/06/21 10/13/21 10/21/21 10/28/21 11/04/21 11/11/21 11/19/21Concentration (mg/L)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Raw Influent Filter 1 Effluent Filter 2 Effluent Effluent Target Conc.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 11
5.6 Miscellaneous Water Quality Parameters
Other parameters that were monitored during this study included alkalinity, pH, water temperature, total
organic carbon (TOC), and coliform bacteria. Water temperature and pH were tested on site while alkalinity,
TOC, and coliform bacteria samples were shipped to a certified laboratory for testing.
Alkalinity: Raw water alkalinity averaged 255 mg/L as CaCO3 during the pilot study. Biological
filtration had minor impacts on alkalinity as the effluent concentrations were maintained around 250
mg/L as CaCO3 during the treatment performance phase.
pH: Raw water pH averaged 7.0 SU during the pilot study. Effluent average pH concentrations for
Filter 1 and Filter 2 were 7.2 SU and 7.3 SU, respectively. The slight increase in pH is due to the
water being aerated. When water is aerated, it creates a turbulence which causes the dissolved
carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbonic acid in the water to outgas. Outgasification of CO2 and carbonic
acid from water results in pH increase. Effluent pH concentrations were maintained within the range
set by the treatment goals.
Water Temperature: Raw water temperature ranged from 50.2 ⁰F to 53.4 ⁰F and effluent water
temperatures averaged 53.9 ⁰F. Microorganisms thrive in warmer and stable environments and the
lower water temperatures experienced during the winter months did not affect the perform ance of
the biological filters. Water temperature increased in the pilot skid since the ambient temperature
in the pilot trailer ranged between 50 ⁰F and 60 ⁰F on most days.
TOC: The raw water TOC concentration averaged 2.6 mg/L during the stu dy. Filter 1 and Filter 2
removed on average 14-percent and 16-percent of the influent TOC, respectively. Both removal
performances are on par with results obtained in other biological filtration applications. TOC
sampling was conducted both during the microbial acclimation and the treatment efficiency phases.
Coliform Bacteria: Coliform bacteria were tested during both phases of the study. All laboratory
results, both influent and effluent, returned absent E.Coli results.
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM): Organic carbon in groundwater is predominantly natural organic
matter, which is typically derived from living or decayed vegetation. Natural organic matter can be
present in particulate, dissolved, and colloidal forms, and it is usually assessed w hen TOC exists
in the raw water. Disinfection byproducts (DBPs), which are suspected by the EPA to cause cancer,
can form in the drinking water when natural organic matter is present along with chlorine. This
occurs when chlorine is added to the drinking water for treatment. Higher chlorine doses and TOC
concentrations will lead to more DBPs being formed. DBPs can be assessed based on the TTHM
concentration in the water. The MDH waived the requirement to test for TTHMs during this study
as historically, the TTHM concentrations in Lino Lakes raw water have ranged from 94-percent to
99-percent below EPA’s MCL. The future TTHM concentrations in Lino Lakes are expected to be
even lower if a water treatment plant is constructed as some of the TOC in the raw water will be
removed at the treatment plant. In addition, the TTHMs should become even lower with biological
filtration since prechlorination would not be used in the filtration process.
5.7 Filter Backwash Frequency
Obstruction to water flowing through a filter increases as contaminants are removed from the water and
accumulate in the media over time. This phenomenon is referred to as headloss through the filter. Headloss
will eventually reach a point known as terminal headloss, at which time the filter must be backwashed. If a
filter does not reach terminal headloss to initiate a backwash, weekly backwashes are still recommended
to avoid channeling and breakthrough of contaminants. The terminal headloss was set to 120 inches.
It is not uncommon for conventional water filtration facilities that treat groundwater to be backwashed every
2 to 3 days. On the contrary, biological filtration facilities tend to experience longer filter run times of 3 to 7
days. Usually, the main groundwater contaminant affecting headloss buildup is iron, and water treatment
facilities with high raw water iron concentrations may have to backwash their filters as often as once per
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 12
day. Backwashing impacts the production capacity of a filter as it cannot treat water when being
backwashed. Consequently, it is the goal of any utility to reduce backwashes as much as possible.
The headloss buildup in Filter 1 is shown in Figure 5-5 and the headloss buildup in Filter 2 is shown in
Figure 5-6. The pilot filters were not backwash for a period of 3 to 4 weeks at the beginning of the study to
minimize media disturbance during the acclimation phase and to analyze if terminal headloss could be
reached. However, since the raw water iron concentration was very low, the biological filters never reached
terminal headloss. Consequently, the filters were backwashed every 7 to 15 days after the first month of
the study following the procedure described in Section 4. The rate of headloss buildup was slightly higher
in Filter 2 since greensand media is smaller than silica sand media and can obstruct more water flow. Also,
headloss data collected for Filter 2 in November 2021 is inaccurate. It is suspected that media blocked the
pressure gauge pipe assembly during this month and then dislodged from the pressure gauge.
Figure 5-5. Filter 1 Headloss
Figure 5-6. Filter 2 Headloss
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
09/09/21 09/18/21 09/28/21 10/07/21 10/17/21 10/26/21 11/05/21 11/14/21 11/24/21Headloss (inches)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Terminal Headloss Filter 1 Headloss Backwash Event
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
09/09/21 09/18/21 09/28/21 10/07/21 10/17/21 10/26/21 11/05/21 11/14/21 11/24/21Headloss (inches)Date (mm/dd/yy)
Terminal Headloss Filter 2 Headloss Backwash Event
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 13
5.8 Filter Performance Testing
The MDH biological filtration pilot protocol requires two performance tests to be completed when the filters
are fully acclimated with microorganisms. The first performance test is a backwash recovery test which is
used to evaluate the filtration efficiency of the biological filters immediately after a backwash. The second
performance test is a shutdown recovery test which his used to evaluate the filtration efficiency of the
biological filters after the filters are out of service for one week.
5.8.1 Backwash Recovery Test
It is almost inevitable that some microorganisms will be washed away when backwashing a
biological filter. Therefore, it is important to utilize a backwash strategy that effectively cleans the
filters while minimizing the loss of microorganisms. In order to assess the biological filter recovery,
water quality samples were obtained in 15-minute intervals following a backwash for 30 to 45
minutes. Prior to sampling the post backwash effluent water, the media was allowed to settle for 5
minutes in each filter. The post backwash results were compared to the pre backwash results to
determine how long it required the filter to recover its pre backwash performance. The backwash
recovery test results are summarized in Table 5-5. The backwash recovery test was completed
during the eighth week of the pilot study.
Table 5-5. Backwash Recovery Test Results
Filter
No. Contaminant Pre-Backwash
Conc. (mg/L)
Post Backwash Conc. (mg/L) Target Effluent
Conc. (mg/L) 15-min 30-min 45-min
1
Iron 0.00 0.02 0.02 N/A 0.30
Manganese 0.029 0.032 0.032 0.023 0.050
Ammonia 0.03 0.01 0.03 N/A 0.10
2
Iron 0.01 0.03 0.01 N/A 0.30
Manganese 0.021 0.030 0.036 0.033 0.050
Ammonia 0.03 0.12 0.03 N/A 0.10
All post backwash concentrations for Filter 1 were below the ta rget effluent concentrations set for
this pilot study within 15 minutes of conduc ting a backwash. The pre backwash iron concentration
was not recovered within 45 minutes of the backwash. This is not a concern as the effluent iron
concentration was maintained below the target effluent goal following the backwash.
All post backwash concentrations for Filter 2 were below the target effluent concentrations set for
this pilot study within 30 minutes of conducting a backwash. The pre backwash manganese
concentration was not recovered within 45 minutes of the backwash. This is not a concern as the
effluent manganese concentration was maintained below the target effluent goal following the
backwash.
5.8.2 Shutdown Recovery Test
Microorganisms need “food” (oxygen, nutrients, and contaminants) in order to survive. Therefore,
a portion of the microorganisms may not survive if water flow is stopped and “food” is not available.
In order to test the survivability of the microorganisms, both filters were shut down for a peri od of
one week. Similar to the backwash recovery test, the performance of each filter was measured
before and after the shutdown to determine the recovery time of each filter for up to 24 hours. The
shutdown recovery test results are summarized in Table 5-6. The shutdown recovery test was
completed during the last week of the pilot study.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 14
Table 5-6. Shutdown Recovery Test Results
Filter
No. Contaminant Pre-Shutdown
Conc. (mg/L)
Post Shutdown Conc. (mg/L) Target Effluent
Conc. (mg/L) 30-min 1-hour 2-hour 24-hour
1
Iron 0.01 0.01 N/A N/A N/A 0.30
Manganese 0.017 0.092 0.023 0.022 0.026 0.050
Ammonia 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.01 0.20
2
Iron 0.01 0.02 0.01 N/A N/A 0.30
Manganese 0.015 0.087 0.025 0.027 0.022 0.050
Ammonia 0.02 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.04 0.20
All post shutdown concentrations for Filter 1 were below the target effluent concentrations set for
this pilot study within 1 hour of re-starting the filter. The pre shutdown manganese concentration
was not recovered within 24 hours of the re-startup. This is not a concern as the effluent manganese
concentration was below the MDH guidance value for infants within 30 minutes of filter startup.
All post shutdown concentrations for Filter 2 were below the target effluent concentrations set for
this pilot study within 1 hour of re-starting the filter. The pre shutdown ammonia and manganese
concentrations were not recovered within 24 hours of the re-startup. This is not a concern as the
effluent manganese concentration was below the MDH guidance value for infants within 30 minutes
of filter startup and the effluent ammonia concentration was maintained below the target treated
goal following the shutdown period.
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 15
6. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Instead of relying heavily on chemicals like other treatment methods, biological filtration relies on naturally
occurring microorganisms to treat water. Therefore, one of the main advantages of biological filtration is the
reduction of chemical usage which can result in significant chemical savings over time. In addition,
biological filtration produces less processed and more sustainable water due to the reduction of chemical
use. Biological filtration eliminates the need to feed chlorine upstream of the filters (p rechlorination) to
oxidize iron and ammonia and the need to feed permanganate (potassium or sodium permanganate) to
oxidize manganese. Similar to conventional filtration, chlorine is still needed downstream of the filters for
disinfection purposes. In addition to chlorine, fluoride is also needed in the finished water. Orthophosphate
is sometimes also needed in the plant effluent for lead and copper corrosion control in the water distribution
system.
Figure 6-1 shows a 20-year projection of the annual water treatment chemical costs in Lino Lakes for a
conventional filtration facility and a biological filtration facility. Che micals included in this analysis consist of
permanganate and chlorine. Fluoride and orthophosphate were not included in this analysis as both
chemicals may be needed in the same amount regardless of the treatment type used. The chemical cost
projection below includes a 3-percent inflation rate.
Figure 6-1. Chemical Cost Projection for Water Treatment
The chemical cost projection shown in Figure 6-1 is summarized in Table 6-1 below. As shown in the table
below, biological filtration has the potential of generating almost $950,000 in chemical savings over the next
20 years by eliminating the use of permanganate and prechlorination.
Table 6-1. Cumulative Chemical Cost Projection
Year Conventional
Treatment
Biological
Treatment
Cumulative
Savings
2020 $ 34,405 $ 6,738 $ 27,667
2030 $ 476,597 $ 96,718 $ 379,879
2040 $ 1,192,271 $ 242,339 $ 949,932
$-
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040Chemical Costs ($)Date (yyyy)
Conventional Filtration Biological Filtration
Water Treatment Pilot Study Report
Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6
City of Lino Lakes, MN
WSB Project No. 018601-000 Page 16
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
The final conclusions and recommendations from this pilot study to assess the feasibility of biological
filtration as a water treatment method in Lino Lakes are summarized as follows:
7.1 Performance Takeaways
Aeration Requirements: An air flow rate to water flow rate ratio of 0.40 CFM/GPM was sufficient
to promote rapid biological growth and to maintain an effluent DO concentration above 4 mg/L.
Iron Removal: The iron concentration in the raw water was reduced from an average of 0.05 mg/L
to an average 0.02 mg/L, which is 93-percent below the EPA Secondary Standard for iron. Both
biological filters produced similar effluent iron concentrations throughout the pilot study.
Manganese Removal: The manganese concentration in the raw water was reduced from an
average of 0.410 mg/L to an average of 0.040 mg/L in Filter 1 and 0.023 mg/L in Filter 2. All effluent
manganese concentrations during the treatment efficiency phase were bel ow EPA’s Secondary
Standard and MDH’s guidance values for manganese.
Ammonia Removal: The ammonia concentration in the raw water was reduced from an average
of 0.35 mg/L to an average 0.02 mg/L in Filter 1 and 0.03 mg/L in Filter 2. All effluent concentrations
during the treatment efficiency phase were below the target concentration of 0.10 mg/L.
Nutrient Requirements: The raw water orthophosphate concentration was sufficient to promote
rapid biological growth, and additional nutrients were not required during the pilot study.
Filter Headloss and Backwash Frequency: Terminal headloss was never reached during the
study and the biological pilot filters were backwashed every 7 to 15 days. The rate of headloss
buildup was slightly higher in Filter 2 when compared to Filter 1.
Filter Performance Testing: Filter performance testing determined that the effluent treatment
goals were met within 30 minutes following a filter backwash and within 1 hour following a 1-week
plant shutdown. Filter 1 recovered slightly faster than Filter 2.
7.2 Financial Takeaways
Implementing biological filtration in Lino Lakes has the potential of generating approximately $950,000 in
chemical savings over the next 20 years when compared to conventional filtration. In addition to generating
operational savings, utilizing fewer chemicals produces less processed and more sustainable water.
7.3 Recommendation
As recommended in the City’s Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study, it is recommended to design and
construct a gravity filtration water treatment plant with biological filtration in Lino Lakes given its piloted
treatment performance and projected operational cost savings. Both media types piloted exhibited similar
removal performance, headloss buildup rates, and responded similarly to filter performance testing.
However, gravity filters with silica sand and anthracite are recommended for Lino Lakes since the silica
sand filter had a lower rate of headloss than the greensand filter and should require less frequent filter
backwashing. In addition, silica sand is less expensive than greensand filter media.
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
1
1
LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL 2
SPECIAL MEETING 3
MINUTES 4
5
DATE : March 7, 2022 6
TIME STARTED : 6:05 p.m. 7
TIME ENDED : 6:12 p.m. 8
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, 9
Ruhland, Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 10
MEMBERS ABSENT : 11
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Human Resources and Communications 12
Manager Meg Sawyer; City Clerk Julie Bartell 13
14
PUBLIC COMMENT 15
There were no public comments. 16
SETTING THE AGENDA 17
The agenda was approved as presented. 18
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 19
1A) Consider Appointment of Aquatics Supervisor - Human Resources and Communications 20
Manager Sawyer reviewed her written report outlining applicant qualifications, the recruitment 21
process and a recommendation to appoint Madeline Rosewood to the new position. 22
Mayor Rafferty asked if this is a union position. Administrator Cotton explained that the City is 23
working with a labor attorney to determine what is appropriate for this position. 24
Councilmember Lyden remarked that this candidate is well qualified according to her resume. 25
Councilmember Lyden moved to approve the appointment of Madeline Rosewood to the position of 26
Aquatics Supervisor. Councilmember Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 27
1B) Consider Appointment of Building Inspector - Human Resources and Communications 28
Manager Sawyer reviewed her written report outlining applicant qualifications, the recruitment 29
process, and a recommendation to appoint Joel McPherson to the vacant position. 30
Mayor Rafferty remarked on the importance of filling this position since the building season is 31
quickly approaching and the City doesn’t want to fall behind with the inspection process. 32
Councilmember Ruhland moved to approve the appointment of Joel McPherson to the position of 33
Building Inspector. Councilmember Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 34
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 35
There was no Unfinished Business. 36
37
NEW BUSINESS 38
There was no New Business. 39
40
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
2
ADJOURN 41
42
There being no further business, Councilmember Lyden moved to adjourn at 6:12 p.m. 43
Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 44
45
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on March 14, 2022. 46
47
48
49
50
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 51
52
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : March 7, 2022 4
TIME STARTED : 6:15 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 7:45 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, 7
Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : 9
Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Community Development 10
Director Michael Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Director of Public Safety John 11
Swenson; City Clerk Julie Bartell 12
13
(5:30 pm) The Rookery Activity Center (visit facility) 14
15
1. Water Treatment Pilot Study, Greg Johnson and Ursinio Puga of WSB and 16
Associates – Mr. Johnson reviewed the written report noting that in 2021 the council had 17
authorized WSB to complete the pilot study. Mr. Johnson added that the biological 18
filtration process being recommended is already being used effectively in several other 19
cities and has been utilized in Europe for decades. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Puga reviewed 20
a PowerPoint presentation that included information on: 21
22
- Raw Water Quality – parameters for monitoring the water for pilot study; 23
focus on removing iron, manganese and ammonia from water; dissolved 24
oxygen and orthophosphate will also be discussed; 25
- What is Biological Filtration – microorganisms are already in the water and 26
need optimum conditions to get to the level to remove; other biological 27
filtration plants in the state; 28
- Conventional Filtration vs. Biological Filtration – comparison table; chemicals 29
are reduced by utilizing biological process; the rest of the process is same 30
minus some of the chemicals; 31
- Pilot Study Goals and Objectives; 32
- Pilot Plant Setup and Operation – view of pilot study testing machine used at 33
Well No. 6; two filter medias were compared; trailer was used for testing; 34
- Pilot Study Results – Found orthophosphate adequate; graph showing aeration 35
requirements; oxygen is added in the form of natural air; iron isn’t a big goal 36
because it is already okay; ammonia results also graphed and reviewed; 37
- Financial Analysis – both treatment options include the same steps of treating 38
the water; with biological treatment chemicals are greatly reduced; graph 39
comparing costs for chemicals (inflated numbers used); Mr. Puga noted 40
information from another city that has already changed from conventional to 41
biological filtration and who experienced savings because of the rise in supply 42
costs; 43
- Conclusions; 44
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
2
- Recommendation – move forward to biological filtration treatment because it 45
has proven performance and operational savings; recommending silica sand as 46
filter media as it is less expensive and less backwash required with similar 47
performance. 48
49
Mr. Johnson remarked that he isn’t aware of any utility that has chosen to switch back to 50
conventional filtering although it is possible to do so. 51
52
Mayor Rafferty asked about future considerations. It was clarified that design is intended 53
for the future and growth as well. When the mayor noted the possibility of biological 54
immunity developing, the engineers gave several examples of plants in place for some 55
time and also noted that biological filtration has been used for waste treatment for a 56
century. 57
58
Councilmember Stoesz asked about the option of adding softening treatment. Mr. 59
Johnson replied that such an option is available but generally it doubles the cost of a 60
plant. 61
62
The council heard about having satellite plants or having a large single plant. 63
Community Development Director Grochala explained how wells could be staged to 64
maximize available plant(s). 65
66
Staff will come back in April to talk about next steps. The council will be asked to 67
accept the report formally at the next council meeting. 68
69
2. WBL – Water Appropriation Permit Appeal Update – Community 70
Development Director Grochala reviewed his written report. He explained that the City 71
is under a court order and he reviewed the requirements of the order. A group of cities, 72
including Lino Lakes, appealed the orders in court and, with a hearing pending on the 73
appeal, attorneys are meeting with the judge to see what can move forward. Of great 74
concern are two conditions – prohibition on new well permits within certain areas; and 75
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is ordered to adjust area 76
withdrawal permits. The DNR, using modeling, indicates a 40% reduction in our existing 77
water use (basically winter use all year and a threat to any water use past domestic use). 78
The DNR has written to the court to discuss the potential ramifications of following 79
through on the court orders. Staff is working with Senator Chamberlain and 80
Representative Raleigh and there is an impactful bill under consideration at the state 81
legislature that would allow cities to continue with their plans while looking at other ways 82
to address the White Bear Lake situation. The discussion is ongoing including with the 83
DNR about trading an older less producing well for a newer better producer. Some of the 84
discussion about where wells could be located has changed because of the treatment 85
option that may occur. Mr. Johnson added that he believes the DNR is gathering 86
information to utilize in discussions with the court. 87
88
Mr. Grochala remarked that there is a lot going and staff may be bringing forward a 89
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
3
resolution in support of legislation. Councilmember Lyden noted the difficulty of 90
regulating private wells. 91
92
The council requests that staff keep them informed. 93
94
3. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council 95
96
NorthMetro Television – Councilmember Stoesz noted that he was elected to the chair 97
position again; 98
VLAWMO – Mayor Rafferty noted a joint effort for a grant. 99
100
4. Adjourn 101
102
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. 103
104
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 105
March 14, 2022. 106
107
108
109
110
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Rob Rafferty, Mayor 111
112
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 22-34, Supporting Legislative Efforts to
Ensure a Sustainable, Safe, and Reliable Water Supply
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting Council consideration to support legislative efforts to that address local
concerns regarding the City’s water supply appropriation.
BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2018, in response to a District Court order, the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources amended the City’s water appropriation permit due to fluctuating lake levels
on White Bear Lake. Lino Lakes, along with several other municipalities, objected to the
conditions and requested a hearing pursuant to state law. The administrative hearing process
was stayed pending completion of the DNR’s appeal of the District Court’s Order. The appeals
process was completed and the DNR provided notice in May of 2021 that the appeals cases
would be reinstituted. The City is currently waiting for scheduling of the hearings.
The DNR has also continued to implement additional components of the Court Order. On
February 7, 2022 the DNR filed a letter with the Court addressing the potential impacts of the
Court’s Order to establish a collective annual withdrawal limit. The DNR acknowledged that
the withdrawal limit would require permit reductions far below the 75 gallon per day per capita
residential water use and 90 gallons per day total per capita water use. DNR has estimated that
a 40% reduction in current water use would be needed to meet the Court Order.
These restrictions would have a significant impact on water access for non domestic use such
as schools, hospitals, churches, new housing and commercial developments, and businesses and
industries located within the City.
The City of Lino Lakes and other affected communities and businesses believe that this is a
regional issue that needs further evaluation, and local input to arrive at a solution.
Accordingly, the affected communities have proposed legislation that:
1. Protects municipal water permits, including those that involve water from the Prairie du
Chien-Jordan Aquifer, from legal challenges.
2. Directs the DNR to explore innovative options for meeting the water needs of our
residents, hospitals, schools, industries, and future development and ensuring the
sustainability and quality of the state's water resources in and around White Bear Lake
and neighboring aquifers.
3. Allows the DNR the discretion to issue and amend groundwater water appropriation
permits as the DNR determines appropriate.
The legislation (SF 3055) was approved by the Senate Environment and Natural Resources
Policy and Legacy Finance Committee and sent to the Senate floor for consideration. The
legislation was also introduced in the House (HF 3880) and is pending a committee hearing.
The proposed resolution indicates support from the City of Lino Lakes for adoption of the
legislation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 22-34.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 22-34
2. SF 3088
220775
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 34
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO ENSURE A
SUSTAINABLE, SAFE, AND RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY
WHEREAS, the City holds a water appropriation permit to draw water from the Prairie du
Chien-Jordan Aquifer, which feeds into White Bear Lake, and this permit allows the City to
provide safe water to its residents, businesses, schools, churches, hospitals, and government
facilities;
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2018, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources amended
the City’s water appropriation permit due to fluctuating lake levels on White Bear Lake and the
resulting advocacy of homeowners on the lake who want sufficient lake levels for recreational
activities; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”), at the direction of a
2021 Ramsey County Court Order in Case File No: 62-CV-13-2414, filed a letter with the Court
on February 7, 2022 illustrating its preparedness to limit the City’s water appropriation permit to
residential use only, and to limit use to 55 gallons of water per day per person on average, along
with other municipalities within a 5 mile range of White Bear Lake in order to comply with the
Court’s Order;
WHEREAS, such proposed restrictions on the City’s water permit present a dire threat to safe
and reliable water access for schools, hospitals, churches, new housing and commercial
developments, and businesses and industries located within the City;
WHEREAS, the DNR’s potential permit amendments threaten the health, welfare, growth, and
prosperity of the City, and surrounding communities, and is an untenable solution to shared use
of the aquifer;
WHEREAS, the issue of groundwater usage from the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer is a
regional concern that involves a significant number of communities across three counties,
including their residents, businesses, schools, hospitals, and numerous other public and private
uses.
WHEREAS, recognizing the importance of conservation and sustainability is best achieved
through localized strategies;
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature is in a position to provide a legislative solution to
groundwater permitting in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer and reinforce the role of the DNR
in engaging in water appropriation based on science and public health.
220775
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
respectfully requests that the legislature enact legislation that accomplishes the following:
1. Protects municipal water permits, including those that involve water from the Prairie du
Chien-Jordan Aquifer, from legal challenges.
2. Directs the DNR to explore innovative options for meeting the water needs of our
residents, hospitals, schools, industries, and future development and ensuring the
sustainability and quality of the state's water resources in and around White Bear Lake
and neighboring aquifers.
3. Allows the DNR the discretion to issue and amend groundwater water appropriation
permits as the DNR determines appropriate.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember
_______________and was duly seconded by Councilmember ________________ and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_____________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
______________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to natural resources; requiring the issuance or modification of groundwater
1.3 appropriation permits near White Bear Lake; requiring the development of
1.4 recommendations to ensure safe drinking water for east metropolitan communities
1.5 in a manner that supports both growth and sustainability; requiring a report;
1.6 amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 103G.211; 103G.285, by adding a
1.7 subdivision; 103G.287, by adding subdivisions; 116B.03, subdivision 1; 116B.10,
1.8 by adding a subdivision.
1.9 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.10 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 103G.211, is amended to read:
1.11 103G.211 DRAINING PUBLIC WATERS PROHIBITED WITHOUT
1.12 REPLACEMENT.
1.13 (a) Except as provided in sections 103G.221 to 103G.235, public waters may not be
1.14 drained, and a permit authorizing drainage of public waters may not be issued, unless the
1.15 public waters to be drained are replaced by public waters that will have equal or greater
1.16 public value.
1.17 (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the commissioner from issuing
1.18 or amending a water-use permit for appropriation from groundwater where:
1.19 (1) the application is for a new groundwater well or to increase appropriation amounts
1.20 under an existing permit;
1.21 (2) the applicant is a municipality wholly or partially located within a five-mile radius
1.22 of White Bear Lake; and
1Section 1.
S3055-1 1st EngrossmentSF3055 REVISOR CKM
SENATE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
S.F. No. 3055NINETY-SECOND SESSION
(SENATE AUTHORS: HOUSLEY, Chamberlain and Wiger)
OFFICIAL STATUSD-PGDATE
Introduction and first reading496802/10/2022
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Legacy Finance
Author added Wiger508902/21/2022
Comm report: To pass as amended5169a03/02/2022
Second reading5175
2.1 (3) the amount of water to be appropriated under the proposal is consistent with the
2.2 amount anticipated to be needed by the applicant each year according to a water supply
2.3 plan approved by the commissioner under section 103G.291 before 2021.
2.4 (c) Paragraph (b) and this paragraph expire on January 1, 2041.
2.5 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
2.6 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
2.7 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 103G.285, is amended by adding a subdivision
2.8 to read:
2.9 Subd. 7.Application.(a) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the
2.10 commissioner from issuing or amending a water-use permit for appropriation from
2.11 groundwater where:
2.12 (1) the application is for a new groundwater well or to increase appropriation amounts
2.13 under an existing permit;
2.14 (2) the applicant is a municipality wholly or partially located within a five-mile radius
2.15 of White Bear Lake; and
2.16 (3) the amount of water to be appropriated under the proposal is consistent with the
2.17 amount anticipated to be needed by the applicant each year according to a water supply
2.18 plan approved by the commissioner under section 103G.291 before 2021.
2.19 (b) This subdivision expires on January 1, 2041.
2.20 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
2.21 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
2.22 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 103G.287, is amended by adding a subdivision
2.23 to read:
2.24 Subd. 6.Application.(a) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the
2.25 commissioner from issuing or amending a water-use permit for appropriation from
2.26 groundwater where:
2.27 (1) the application is for a new groundwater well or to increase appropriation amounts
2.28 under an existing permit;
2.29 (2) the applicant is a municipality wholly or partially located within a five-mile radius
2.30 of White Bear Lake; and
2Sec. 3.
S3055-1 1st EngrossmentSF3055 REVISOR CKM
3.1 (3) the amount of water to be appropriated under the proposal is consistent with the
3.2 amount anticipated to be needed by the applicant each year according to a water supply
3.3 plan approved by the commissioner under section 103G.291 before 2021.
3.4 (b) This subdivision expires on January 1, 2041.
3.5 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
3.6 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
3.7 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 103G.287, is amended by adding a subdivision
3.8 to read:
3.9 Subd. 7.Issuance of certain permits.(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
3.10 the commissioner must issue a water-use permit for appropriation from groundwater that
3.11 meets the criteria of subdivision 6. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prohibit
3.12 the commissioner from imposing conditions on the permit so long as the conditions do not
3.13 prevent the applicant from appropriating the amount of groundwater applied for.
3.14 (b) This subdivision expires on January 1, 2041.
3.15 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
3.16 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
3.17 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 116B.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
3.18 Subdivision 1.Parties.Any person residing within the state; the attorney general; any
3.19 political subdivision of the state; any instrumentality or agency of the state or of a political
3.20 subdivision thereof; or any partnership, corporation, association, organization, or other
3.21 entity having shareholders, members, partners or employees residing within the state may
3.22 maintain a civil action in the district court for declaratory or equitable relief in the name of
3.23 the state of Minnesota against any person, for the protection of the air, water, land, or other
3.24 natural resources located within the state, whether publicly or privately owned, from
3.25 pollution, impairment, or destruction; provided, however, that no action shall be is allowable
3.26 hereunder under this section for:
3.27 (1) acts taken by a person on land leased or owned by said person pursuant to a permit
3.28 or license issued by the owner of the land to said person which do not and can not reasonably
3.29 be expected to pollute, impair, or destroy any other air, water, land, or other natural resources
3.30 located within the state; provided further that no action shall be allowable under this section
3.31 for
3Sec. 5.
S3055-1 1st EngrossmentSF3055 REVISOR CKM
4.1 (2) conduct taken by a person pursuant to any environmental quality standard, limitation,
4.2 rule, order, license, stipulation agreement or permit issued by the Pollution Control Agency,
4.3 Department of Natural Resources, Department of Health or Department of Agriculture.; or
4.4 (3) issuance of a groundwater appropriation permit that meets the criteria under section
4.5 103G.287, subdivision 6, by the Department of Natural Resources. This clause expires on
4.6 January 1, 2041.
4.7 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
4.8 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
4.9 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 116B.10, is amended by adding a subdivision to
4.10 read:
4.11 Subd. 6.Application.No action is allowable under this section for issuance of a
4.12 groundwater appropriation permit that meets the criteria under section 103G.287, subdivision
4.13 6, by the Department of Natural Resources. This subdivision expires on January 1, 2041.
4.14 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment, and
4.15 applies to applications for new or modified permits filed on or after that date.
4.16 Sec. 7. ENSURING SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER LEVELS IN WHITE BEAR
4.17 LAKE AND RELATED AQUIFERS.
4.18 The commissioner of natural resources, in cooperation with the Minnesota Department
4.19 of Health, the Metropolitan Council, and representatives of east metropolitan area
4.20 municipalities, must explore available options for supplying east metropolitan area
4.21 communities with safe drinking water in a manner that allows municipal growth while
4.22 simultaneously ensuring the sustainability and quality of the state's water resources in and
4.23 around White Bear Lake and neighboring aquifers. By October 1, 2023, the commissioner
4.24 must report findings and recommendations to the chairs and ranking minority members of
4.25 the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural
4.26 resources.
4.27 Sec. 8. CONTINUATION OF OTHER WATER APPROPRIATION PERMITS.
4.28 Prior to additional rulemaking or legislative action in response to the findings and
4.29 recommendations submitted pursuant to section 7, the commissioner of natural resources
4.30 shall not reduce appropriations under a groundwater appropriations permit, terminate
4.31 groundwater appropriations authorized by a permit, or decline to renew a groundwater
4.32 appropriations permit where:
4Sec. 8.
S3055-1 1st EngrossmentSF3055 REVISOR CKM
5.1 (1) the permit was in effect as of December 31, 2021;
5.2 (2) the permit authorized appropriation of groundwater from a site located wholly or
5.3 partially within a five-mile radius of White Bear Lake;
5.4 (3) the permittee is in compliance with applicable permit terms; and
5.5 (4) the permittee is not a municipality.
5Sec. 8.
S3055-1 1st EngrossmentSF3055 REVISOR CKM
AGENDA ITEM 1I
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy Clerk
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Approve Application for Aquinas Roman Catholic Home
Education Services to Conduct Excluded Bingo Event
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required)
INTRODUCTION
The City has received an application from the Aquinas Roman Catholic Home Education
Services (ARCHES) organization to conduct an excluded bingo event at St. Joseph’s
Church, 171 Elm Street, Lino Lakes on April 2, 2022.
BACKGROUND
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.166, excluded bingo may be conducted by an
organization that conducts four or fewer bingo occasions in a calendar year, or in
connection with a county fair, the state fair, or a civic celebration if it is not conducted for
more than 12 consecutive days. The Aquinas Roman Catholic Home Education Services
organization meets this requirement. The organization also meets the requirements of the
Lino Lakes City Code since the physical site where the organization regularly conducts
its activities is located within the city (St. Joseph’s Church).
City policy requires a background investigation on the applicant (James Kostick) which
has been successfully completed by the Public Safety Department in the past 12 months.
The Application and a certificate of non-profit status from the Internal Revenue Service
are on file in the city clerk’s office.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the application for the Aquinas Roman Catholic Home Education Services
(ARCHES) to conduct an Excluded Bingo Event on April 2, 2022.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1J
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Lisa Hogstad-Osterhues, Deputy Clerk
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Approving Application for an Exempt Permit for
Lawful Gambling Conducted by St. Joseph of the Lakes
Catholic Church
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote
INTRODUCTION
St. Joseph of the Lakes Catholic Church has applied for an exempt permit to conduct a raffle,
bingo and pull-tabs on Saturday, August 13 and Sunday August 14, 2022.
BACKGROUND
Non-profit organizations are allowed, under the State Gambling Statutes, to apply for an
exemption from a gambling license if they conduct five (5) or fewer gambling occasions per
calendar year. St. Joseph of the Lakes Catholic Church conducts five (5) or less per calendar
year and, therefore, remains exempt from requiring a gambling license.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, Section 349.166, Subd. 2 does, however, require that the non-
profit organizations applying for the exemption permit, notify the city that they are applying for
the exemption and receive local approval.
The application and background materials are on file in City Clerk’s office.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion approving the application for exemption with no waiting period.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Appointment of Activity Center Coordinator
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Ben Natzke to the newly created
Activity Center Coordinator position at the Rookery Activity Center.
BACKGROUND
At this time staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer
contingent upon a complete background check, and is recommending the approval of Ben
Natzke for the position.
Natzke holds a Master’s degree in Sports Management from Minnesota State University,
Mankato. Natzke has over 4 years of community center experience and has been the Manager
on Duty at the New Brighton Community Center and the Shoreview Community Center.
The hourly rate of pay would be $30.66, which is Starting Step of the current 6 step wage
schedule.
With the Council’s approval, Natzke would start in the position of Activity Center Coordinator
on March 28, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Please approve the appointment of Ben Natzke for the Activity Center Coordinator position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Appointment of Utilities Maintenance Worker
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Kyle Dubois to the vacant
Utilities Maintenance Worker position in the Public Works department.
BACKGROUND
Staff has completed the recruitment process, provided a conditional offer, and is recommending
the approval of Kyle Dubois for the position.
Dubois graduated from Forest Lake High School and has previous Public Works experience at
Washington County Highway Department.
The hourly rate of pay would be $29.32, which is Step 2 of the current 6 step wage schedule.
With Council’s approval, Dubois would start in the position on March 28, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Kyle Dubois to the Utilities Maintenance Worker position.
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee P.E., City Engineer
Kelsey Gelhar, Project Engineer
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Rehbeins Black Dirt
i. Consider Resolution No. 22-30 Approving Conditional
Use Permit
ii. Consider Resolution No. 22-31 Approving Site
Improvement Performance Agreement
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting City Council consideration of the Conditional Use Permit for earth moving
and a black dirt stockpile on the properties located on 21st Avenue South (PID #24-31-22-24-
0002, #24-31-22-24-0008, and #24-31-22-24-0009).
Complete Application Date: January 12, 2022
60-Day Review Deadline: NA
120-Day Review Deadline: NA
Environmental Board Meeting: February 9, 2022
Park Board Meeting: NA
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: March 14, 2022
City Council Work Session: March 13, 2022
City Council Meeting: May 12, 2022
BACKGROUND
Gerald Rehbein submitted a Land Use Application for a conditional use permit for earth
moving/black dirt stockpile on the properties located on 21st Avenue South. The black dirt
stockpile operation will replace the existing location at 6921 21st Avenue S, Centerville,
Minnesota. Operations at 6921 21st Avenue S will cease once the Lino Lakes site is
operational. The applicant stated the material from the stockpile will be available for public
and local business use during the summer months from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
This staff report is based on the following plan sets:
2
• ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated December 23,
2021
• Site, Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated
January 10, 2022
• Clearwater Creek Business Center North Wetland Delineation Report prepared by
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc., dated August 5, 2021
• Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Report, Haugo Geotechnical Services, dated
November 26, 2021
• Applicant’s Rice Creek Watershed District permit application, dated January 10, 2022
ANALYSIS
Section 1007.050 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes requirements for earth moving and land
reclamation. Earth removal, land reclamation, material storage or filling is a permitted use in
all zoning districts. A conditional use permit is required when 5,000 cubic yards or more of
material is planned to be removed or deposited on any lot or parcel.
The three parcels are approximately 18.36 acres and are located between 21st Avenue S and I-
35E. The proposed stockpile will be approximately 2.7 acres in area, will have a maximum
height of 40 feet, and will be approximately 100,000 cubic yards of black dirt according to the
plans. The applicant estimates there will be a maximum of 50 trucks per day accessing the site.
Access
The site is located at the intersection of 21st Avenue S and Commerce Drive. The applicant is
currently proposing access to the site from 21st Avenue S via a rock construction entrance that
will be converted to a gravel entrance after the initial import of the black dirt material.
Wetlands
Wetlands are shown on the plan sheet and do not appear to be impacted by the black dirt
stockpile. A wetland delineation was completed onsite in June of 2021 by Kjolhaug
Environmental Services Company, Inc. The Wetland Delineation Report dated August 5, 2021
states there are five (5) wetlands onsite. The estimated wetland boundaries are shown to be at a
sufficient distance from the proposed areas of disturbance. As the proposed, the project will
not impact any wetlands.
Drainage Ditches
Judicial Ditch No. 3 (Clearwater Creek) borders adjacent property to the south of the site and a
private drainage ditch runs on the easterly side of the property. The applicant is not proposing
any changes to the existing drainage patterns to the drainage ditches.
Floodplain
The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone A floodplain on the site. The applicant is not proposing any
impacts to the floodplain on the site.
3
Grading and Drainage
A Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control plan was submitted and has been reviewed by the City
Engineer and Environmental Coordinator. Please see attached comments.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
The parcels are guided for commercial development and are currently zoned GB, General
Business. Section 1007.050, Earth Moving and Land Reclamation states earth removal shall be
permitted in all zoning districts and establishes conditions that must be met.
Tree Preservation Plan
A tree preservation plan is not required. There are no significant trees within the project area.
Surrounding Parcels
Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use
North GB Commercial & Vacant
Commercial Commercial
South GB Vacant Commercial Commercial
East I-35E I-35E I-35E
West 21st Ave S & City
of Centerville
21st Ave S & City of
Centerville
21st Ave S & City of
Centerville
Environmental Review
The Environmental Coordinator has reviewed the proposal and recommendations are attached.
Site Performance Agreement
Site Performance Agreement shall be required. A grading permit and securities shall be
deposited by the applicant.
Planning and Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on February 9, 2022. Representatives of
the applicant introduced themselves to the Planning & Zoning Board. No other public
comments were made at the public hearing. The Board recommended approval with a 4-0 vote
with conditions as detailed in Resolution No. 22-30.
Findings of Fact
Resolution No. 22-30 details the Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact.
4
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the
proposed earth moving operation on 21st Avenue South.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Site, Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
2. City Engineer Memo dated February 4, 2022
3. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated January 18th, 2022
4. Resolution No. 22-30
5. Resolution No. 22-31
6. Site Improvement Performance Agreement
906904904
902
90
2 90490690
6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>FM FM
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>90890490690690890490290
6
904902904906902906906908904904902906908908908908
906
906
906ofREHBEIN BLACK DIRT
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
f:\jobs\9841 - 9860\9860 - rehbein - lino lakes freeway corner\cad\engineering\9860_plan.dwgSave Date:01/10/22 REVISIONSDRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:ISSUE DATE:JTRJTR01/10/22Joseph T. Radach, P.E.Name:Signature:Date:01/10/22License #:45889I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota1. 2SITE, GRADING, EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANC1
REHBEIN PROPERTIES
7625 24th Avenue N
Hugo, MN 55038Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR
178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner, City of Lino Lakes
From: Kelsey Gelhar, EIT, WSB
Diane Hankee, City Engineer, City of Lino Lakes
Date: February 4, 2022
Re: Rehbein Black Dirt CUP
Plan Review
WSB Project Number – 019710-000
WSB has reviewed the final plat for the NorthPointe Garden Estates development in Lino Lakes,
MN, prepared by Carlson McCain, received on January 10, 2022. These comments are based on
the following final plan sets and plat documents:
• Rehbein Black Dirt Site, Grading, Erosion And Sediment Control Plan prepared by
Carlson McCain, dated January 10, 2022, received January 10, 2022.
• ALTA/NPS Land Title Survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated December 23,
2021, received January 10, 2022
Applicant to respond to these comments in writing on this word document. Any changes to the
plans that are not associated with these comments shall be identified by either a summary in the
response or in the plans with a revision cloud or note.
Engineering
• General
The Rehbein Black Dirt development proposes to stockpile black dirt for commercial use.
The site will be accessed from 21st Avenue S and is adjacent to I-35E. The three parcels
being utilized for the black dirt operation are approximately 18.36 acres.
The proposed stockpile will be approximately 2.7 acres in area, will have a maximum height
of 40 feet, and be approximately 103,000 cubic yards of black dirt based on the plans.
Comments:
1. Applicant to update pile location with setbacks of 80-ft from the northern property
line (shared with Dairy Queen) and 50-ft from the 21st Avenue S right-of-way.
2. Applicant to provide details on screening (trees, fences, etc.) needed for onsite
equipment.
• Grading, Erosion Control & Stormwater Management
The Rehbein Black Dirt operation will require site grading for the proposed site entrance
and the proposed black dirt stockpile. The stockpile is proposed to have 3:1 side slopes.
One side of the stockpile is designated as the “working face of pile”. The proposed project
Ms. Katie Larsen
2/4/2022
Page 2
Rehbein Black Dirt CUP Engineering Review
is within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The applicant is proposed sediment
control log to surround the stock pile.
Comments:
1. Applicant to update plans to address comments provided by the City’s
Environmental Coordinator regarding erosion control.
2. Applicant to add turf establishment details to the plans (i.e. seed mix type and
application rate, hydromulch type and application rate, etc.)
3. No work shall be completed until a Rice Creek Watershed District permit has
been obtained.
• Water Supply
There is currently an existing 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main along 21st
Avenue S and existing 16-inch diameter DIP water main in an easement in Outlot A of the
Clearwater Creek Business Center Plat (PID 24-31-22-24-0009).
The applicant is not proposing any connections to the municipal water system with this
plan.
Staff does not have any comments at this time.
• Sanitary Sewer
There is currently an existing 8-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sewer main along
21st Avenue S on the north end of the site and existing 21-inch diameter PVC sanitary
sewer in an easement in Outlot A of the Clearwater Creek Business Center Plat (PID 24-
31-22-24-0009).
The applicant is not proposing any connections to the municipal sanitary sewer system
with this plan.
Comments:
1. Applicant to provide sanitation facilities on site for employees.
• Transportation
The site is located at the intersection 21st Avenue S and Commerce Drive. The applicant is
proposing access the site on 21st Avenue S via a gravel driveway. 21st Avenue S is a local
street on the Centerville/Lino Lakes border. The existing right-of-way along 21st Avenue S
varies in width from 50-ft to 73-ft.
The applicant estimates that the maximum truck traffic will be 50 trucks per day visiting the
site. The applicant has an existing black dirt facility on 21st Avenue S south of this project in
Centerville.
Comments:
1. Tracking on 21st Ave S has been an issue with the existing stock pile operations.
The applicant shall extend the proposed gravel entrance to reduce tracking.
Access should come off of Commerce Drive easterly stub.
Ms. Katie Larsen
2/4/2022
Page 3
Rehbein Black Dirt CUP Engineering Review
2. Applicant to submit truck turning template at access point.
3. Applicant to submit a hauling plan with truck weights and associated volume of
material and the number of trips for the initial pile construction. This plan should
meet the 9 ton road restriction.
• Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
There is five existing wetlands on the site according to the Delineation Report
prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Co. in 2021. The applicant is not
proposing any wetland impacts with this project.
Comments:
1. Applicant to show all wetlands on the site. It appears the Kjolhaug identified a
wetland just south of Northern Lights Blvd that is not shown on the site plan.
2. Applicant to provide double silt fence adjacent to wetlands.
• Landscaping
The applicant did not propose any landscaping at this time. If submitted, landscaping will be
reviewed in depth by the City’s Environmental Coordinator.
• Floodplain
The 2015 DFIRM indicates Zone A floodplain on the site. The applicant is not proposing any
impacts to the floodplain on the site.
• Drainage and Utility Easements
The proposed work is located within Lot 2 Block 2 and Outlot A of the Clearwater Creek
Business Center Plat. Lot 2 Block 2 has a 10-ft wide drainage and utility easement along the
lot lines. There is an existing 60-ft wide drainage and utility easement in Outlot A that
connects the Northern Lights Blvd right-of-way to the south limit of the plat. The applicant is
not proposing any changes to the plat.
• Site Performance Agreement
A Site Performance Agreement will be required.
• Grading Agreement
A Grading Agreement is not applicable at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
A Stormwater Maintenance Declaration is not applicable at this time.
• Permits Required
1. NPDES General Construction Permit
2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading
Ms. Katie Larsen
2/4/2022
Page 4
Rehbein Black Dirt CUP Engineering Review
3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane
Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You may also contact Kelsey Gelhar at
(612) 709-4897 or kgelhar@wsbeng.com.
Page 1
To: Diane Hankee, Kelsey Gelhar
From: Andy Nelson
Date: January 18th, 2022
Re: Environmental Comments/Rehbein black dirt pile
1. A trained individual with current certification in erosion and sediment control
must perform inspections at a minimum every 7 days and within 24 hours
after a rainfall event greater than ½ inch in 24 hours. Inspection records must
be retained with the SWPPP and include information detailed in 11.11 of the
Construction Stormwater General Permit. Contact information for the
inspector must be provided to the city prior to any soil disturbance on the site.
2. Silt fence should be used instead of the sediment control logs shown on the
plan. A trench 1-2’ deep on the stockpile side of the silt fence is
recommended to minimize maintenance of the silt fence.
Note that BMPs that become non-functional or ½ full of sediment must be
repaired, replaced, or supplemented by the end of the next day after
discovery.
3. Street tracking generated must be swept within one calendar day of
discovery.
4. Water suppression, soil binding agents, wind blocks, or other dust
suppression methods may be required if dust leaving the site becomes an
issue as identified by the city.
5. Rock construction entrance will require regular maintenance.
6. Portions of the stockpile that are not in regular use should be stabilized with
seed and hyrdomulch.
Environmental Memo
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-30
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EARTH
MOVING AND STOCKPILING AT REHBEINS BLACK DIRT (PIDS #24-31-22-
24-0002, #24-31-22-24-0008, AND #24-31-22-24-0009)
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for a Conditional Use Permit for
earth moving and stockpiling on properties on 21st Avenue South and hereafter referred
to as “Development”; and
WHEREAS, the properties are zoned GB, General Business, and allow for earth
removal, land reclamation, material storage or filling with a conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, the legal descriptions of the subject properties are as follows:
Lot 2, Block 2, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County,
Minnesota; and,
Outlot A, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County, Minnesota;
and,
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section
24, Township 31, Range 22, described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section 24,
thence running East along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter
(SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 275 feet; thence running North parallel with the West line
of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 375 feet;
thence West parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter
(SW ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 275 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of
Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼); thence running South along the West line of said
Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 375 feet to the
point of beginning; Anoka County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the land use application based on the
following plans:
• ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated
December 23, 2021
• Site, Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by Carlson McCain
dated January 10, 2022
• Clearwater Creek Business Center North Wetland Delineation Report prepared by
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc., dated August 5, 2021
• Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Report, Haugo Geotechnical Services,
dated November 26, 2021
2
• Applicant’s Rice Creek Watershed District permit application, dated January 10,
2022; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February
9, 2022, and the Board recommended approval of the conditional use permit.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby makes the following findings:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the
policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including:
a. Land Use Plan.
b. Transportation Plan.
c. Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans.
d. Local Water Management Plan.
e. Capital Improvement Plan.
f. Policy Plan.
g. Natural Environment Plan.
The proposed earth moving/black dirt stockpile is consistent with the Land Use,
Utility, Local Water Management, Capital Improvement, Policy and Natural
Environmental Plans and recommendations of the comprehensive plan with the
required plan revisions as detailed in February 9, 2022, staff report.
2. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land
uses of the area.
The proposed earth moving/black dirt stockpile is compatible with present and future
land uses of the area. Present land use is vacant commercial and future land use is
commercial. Earth moving is allowed in all zoning districts with conditions.
3. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and
other applicable City Codes.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile conforms to the performance
standards of the City Code with conditions as established. The plans have been
reviewed by City staff and were submitted to the RCWD for review.
3
4. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of
the City when:
a. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A
or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of
service more than one grade.
b. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated
by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C.
c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated
by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D.
d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections
providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F,
the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project,
improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better.
e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have
the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed
subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies.
f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street
improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement
Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed
improvements to correct any street deficiencies.
g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I-
35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion,
interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and
the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to
determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must
determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic
contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The
plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and
cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to
traffic at the interchange.
h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
The black dirt stockpile operation currently exists south of the proposed relocation on
the Centerville side of 21st Avenue S. The applicant estimates a maximum of 50 trucks
per day will access the site. A traffic study was not completed due to the fact that the
existing operation is relocating to a nearby site and the current location will cease
4
operations. Traffic generated by the black dirt operation will not change the traffic
on 21st Avenue S or at the 21st Avenue S/Main Street intersection.
21st Avenue S is a 9-ton design, but during spring road restrictions a 5-ton limit
applies. The truck traffic will be limited to these weight restrictions. The hauling,
dumping and grading of excavated materials shall occur within the project
boundaries as shown on the plans. The site will be limited to one access.
5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply.
The proposed earth moving/black dirt stockpile does not require a water service as
proposed. Municipal water main is located along 21st Avenue S and in the drainage
and utility easement on the properties should the applicant wish to connect in the
future.
6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer
system.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile does not require service by sanitary
sewer. However, facilities should be provided on site for any employees of the black
dirt operation. Municipal sanitary sewer is located along 21st Avenue S and in the
drainage and utility easement on the properties should the applicant wish to connect
in the future.
7. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City
funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile will not expend City funds.
8. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,
property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise,
smoke, fumes, glare, or odors.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile will not be detrimental to any
persons or property. Hours of operation, noise control measures, and erosion/dust
control measures will be enforced.
9. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile should not result in the destruction,
loss or damage of natural, scenic or historic features as no known natural, scenic or
historic features exist in the area. The existing wetlands and floodplain will not be
affected by the activities as currently proposed.
5
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of Lino Lakes in addition to the
administrative requirements of a conditional use permit, the following standards of
Section 1007.050, are being met:
(a) Properly fence any pit or excavation, and barricade entrances to prevent the general
public from depositing garbage or refuse.
The proposed plans indicate earth moving for a stockpile, not a pit. The proposed
plans do not currently show any fencing around the earth moving/black dirt stockpile
operation or any barricades at the entrance. Staff is proposing that silt fence be
placed around the stockpile as a condition of this permit.
(b) Slope the banks, and otherwise guard and keep any pit or excavation in such
condition as not to be dangerous because of sliding or caving banks.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile is proposed with 3:1 side slopes on
all sides, except for the working side, reducing the risk of sliding or caving banks.
Areas not being excavated shall be established with turf within seven (7) days of
placement to avoid sliding.
(c) Properly drain, fill, or level off any pit or excavation so as to make the same safe and
healthful as the permitting authority may determine.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt stockpile site is designed to drain in a similar
manner as the existing conditions. Approximately half of the stockpile will drain
towards the existing wetland east of the site and the other half will drain towards 21st
Avenue S. Erosion control is proposed and will be needed to ensure that sediment is
prevented from entering the wetland and storm sewer systems.
(d) Limit the depth of such excavation to an elevation no lower than the minimum floor
elevation for building construction as established by the City Engineer, so as not to
diminish development potential of the parcel.
Not applicable to this project.
(e) Limit any fill material to clean fill, defined as rock, sand, gravel, clay, or other like
and similar non-decomposable material. Concrete, asphalt, metal, wood, and other
debris shall be prohibited.
The project is only proposing stockpiling black dirt. The site will be limited to this
type of material. The City will reserve the right to test the material.
(f) Require that all decomposable material, or other unsuitable foundation material, be
removed from an area before deposition of fill begins.
Not applicable to this project.
6
(g) Prepare a site plan showing existing and proposed grade elevations and effect of
storm water drainage on adjacent areas.
A site plan showing the existing and proposed grade elevations for the proposed
earth moving/ black dirt stockpile was provided.
(h) Specify a time when the excavation or land reclamation project shall be completed.
The proposed earth moving/ black dirt operations will occur in the summer months.
The conditional use permit will be reviewed every three (3) years for renewal.
Renewal shall be approved by City Council.
(i) Place a minimum of four (4) inches of top soil over the completed project and
establish appropriate ground cover within sixty (60) days of completion, or in a time
period consistent with the City’s stormwater management and pollution prevention
plan.
The proposed black dirt stockpile shall be seeded or hydromulched within seven (7)
days of initial placement. Once the stockpile has been relocated to the site, at least
50% of the stockpile shall be stabilized and remain stabilized with vegetation at all
times.
(j) Reimburse the City for the cost of periodic inspections by the City for the purpose of
determining that the terms under which the permit has been issued are being complied
with.
The City will maintain a $5,000 non-interest bearing escrow account provided by the
owner that shall be reestablished annually by January 15th. This escrow will be for
inspection, erosion control, and other City costs associated with the operation of the
stockpile.
If the above escrow amount is insufficient, the owner shall make such additional
deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from
the Escrow with suitable documentation supporting the charges.
(k) Implement the tree preservation plan.
Not applicable to this site.
(l) In addition to a conditional use permit, the City Engineer may determine that permits
in excess of twenty-five thousand (25,000) cubic yards require the applicant to
conduct a neighborhood meeting and to notify affected property owners within one-
quarter (1/4) mile.
Properties within 350 feet, as required for CUP’s, and the City of Centerville were
notified. A neighborhood meeting is not proposed at this time.
7
(m) Post a form of security and sum as the permitted authority may require, running to
the City, conditioned to pay the City the cost and expense of repairing or cleaning any
highways, streets, or other public ways within the City made necessary by the special
burden resulting from transporting thereon by the applicant material to or from the
site, the amount of such cost to be determined by the Council; and conditioned further
to comply with all the requirements of this Ordinance and the particular permit, and
to save the City free and harmless from all suits or claims for damages resulting from
the negligent excavation, removal, storage, or filling of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay,
or other like material within the City.
The City will collect a form of security at the time of approval of the Site Performance
Agreement.
(n) Other conditions deemed appropriate to the application by the permitting authority.
This Conditional Use Permit, if approved by City Council, shall only be valid for
three (3) years and the owner will have to apply for renewal. Renewal must be
approved by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the conditional use permit for earth moving and stockpiling located on 21st
Avenue South (PID #24-31-22-24-0002, #24-31-22-24-0008, and #24-31-22-24-0009)
subject to the following conditions:
1. Stockpile operations shall be limited to the areas identified in the plans prepared
by Carlson McCain, dated January 10, 2022, and any revisions to the plans
approved by the City.
2. Comments from the City Engineer letter dated February 4, 2022, shall be
addressed.
3. Comments from the City Environmental Coordinator letter dated January 18th,
2022, shall be addressed.
4. The vehicles accessing or exiting the site shall not track sediment on 21st Avenue
S. The onsite facilitates and site circulation shall be sufficient to provide sediment
removal prior to accessing City roadways.
5. Stockpile to be at least 80-ft from property lines shared with 2110 Northern
Lights Blvd (currently Dairy Queen).
6. Stockpile shall be at least 50-ft from the road right-of-way.
7. The stockpile shall not exceed 118,000 square feet in area.
8. Silt fence should be used instead of the sediment control logs shown on the plan.
Double silt fence shall be installed where adjacent to wetlands.
9. The type of stockpile material is limited to topsoil borrow as identified in
Minnesota Department of Transportation’s 2020 Standard Specification, Section
3877. Other materials are not allowed and will be required to be removed within
24 hours.
10. Maximum stockpile height is to be limited to 40-ft above the natural grade of the
site.
8
11. Maximum side slope of stockpile to be 3:1, expect for the working face. The
working face shall not be more than 150 ft in length at the base of the stockpile.
12. Maximum stockpile volume to be limited to 100,000 cubic yards.
13. The finished product pile shall not exceed 500 cubic yards in volume and 15-ft in
height.
14. Any erosion control BMP that becomes non-functional or half full of sediment
must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented by the end of the next day after
discovery. BMP’s shall remain in place throughout the duration of the CUP.
15. At least 50% of the stockpile surface area shall be established with vegetation at
all times to prevent erosion.
16. Any street tracking that does occur from vehicles entering or leaving the site must
be swept within one calendar day of discovery. The sediment removal facilities
on site such as the gravel entrance must be maintained to prevent tracking. On
site signage regarding tracking is required.
17. A trained individual with current certification in erosion and sediment control
must perform inspections at a minimum every seven (7) days and within 24 hours
after a rainfall event greater than ½ inch in 24 hours. Inspection records must be
retained with the SWPPP and include information detailed in section 11.11 of the
Construction Stormwater General Permit. Contact information for the inspector
must be provided to the City. Inspection records must be provided to the City
Environmental Coordinator on a monthly basis. Inspection records per NPDES
standards shall be submitted on a monthly basis throughout the duration of the
CUP.
18. Water suppression, soil binding agents, wind blocks, or other dust suppression
methods will be required if dust leaving the site becomes an issue as identified by
the City. Obtaining water to be used for dust control is the responsibility of the
owner.
19. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. during the summer
months (April 1 through November 1).
20. Sanitation facilities must be provided on site. Portable toilets shall be serviced
regularly and screened from visibility of neighboring properties.
21. Equipment on site shall be limited to what is necessary for stockpile operations,
including mobile dirt screener, mobile dirt conveyer, loading and hauling
equipment, and equipment needed for grading. Non-functioning equipment is not
allowed to be stored on site. All equipment shall be screened from public view.
22. Vehicles entering and leaving the site shall adhere to the 9-ton road weight
restriction.
23. Owner to limit speed of trucks entering of leaving the site and along 21st Avenue
to 25 miles per hour.
24. Maximum noise emitted at the property line shall conform to the noise regulations
contained in City Code Section 901.03(4) and the owner shall not violate other
nuisance regulations contained in Chapter 901.
25. Owner shall submit to the City a monthly accounting of material hauled in to the
site and hauled off the site. This accounting of material hauled from the site shall
be in the form of a log of loads hauled out each day and documenting the quantity
of material in each load together with copies of truck load tickets and/or bills of
sale.
9
26. Owner to protect municipal utilities on site from damage. Sanitary sewer main
and water main are located in the drainage and utility easement on the property.
Repair cost shall be the responsibility of the Owner.
27. No fill may be placed in the delineated wetlands or in the FEMA floodplain on
the site. Stockpile shall not encroach within 50-ft of the delineated wetland
boundaries and the FEMA floodplain.
28. Owner will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of Lino
Lakes, Rice Creek Watershed District, Army Corp of Engineers, Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, and any other agency having jurisdiction over the
property and shall secure and file with the City, copies of any permits required by
outside agencies. Owner will file with the City within ten (10) days of receipt,
copies of any permits and/or notice of enforcement actions by these agencies.
29. Owner will permit a City Inspector to view the premises during normal business
hours.
30. The CUP shall only be valid for three (3) years. The permit may be extended by
the City Council following a written request by the applicant submitted at least
three months prior to expiration, and review at a public hearing. A new CUP will
be needed for work (grading, other material stockpiles, excavation of material,
etc.) that is not stated in this CUP.
31. A Site Performance Agreement shall be executed and recorded.
These conditions are to be addressed prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member_______________ and was duly seconded by Council Member
________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-31
RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
WITH REHBEINS BLACK DIRT ((PIDS #24-31-22-24-0002, #24-31-22-24-0008, AND
#24-31-22-24-0009)
WHEREAS, the City has completed review of the site and building plans for Rehbeins Black
Dirt (PIDs #24-31-22-24-0002, #24-31-22-24-0008, and #24-31-22-24-0009); and
WHEREAS, the properties are legally described as:
Lot 2, Block 2, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County, Minnesota;
and,
Outlot A, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County, Minnesota; and,
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section 24,
Township 31, Range 22, described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the Southwest corner of
said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section 24, thence running East
along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance
of 275 feet; thence running North parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of
Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 375 feet; thence West parallel with the South
line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 275 feet to
the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼); thence running
South along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a
distance of 375 feet to the point of beginning; Anoka County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Section 1007.020(5)(d) of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires the execution
of a site performance agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
the Site Improvement Performance Agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and Rehbeins
Black Dirt is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute such
agreements on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member_______________ and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 1 of 9
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made this _______ day of _______________, 2022, is by
and between the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation organized under the laws
of the State of Minnesota, and Rehbeins Black Dirt (PO Box 368, Hugo MN 55038)
(“Developer”).
WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval of a Conditional Use Permit by
Resolution 22-30 and approval of the Site Development Plans, hereinafter called the
"Plans", by the City of Lino Lakes on the 14th day of March, 2022, and in accordance
with the Plans all of which are made a part hereof by reference. In consideration of such
approval, the Developer, its successors and assigns, does covenant and agree to perform
the work as set forth in the Plans, in the aforesaid approval, and as hereinafter set forth
upon the real estate (hereinafter referred to as "Property") described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 2, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County,
Minnesota.; and,
Outlot A, CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER, Anoka County, Minnesota.;
and,
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section
24, Township 31, Range 22, described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) of Section 24,
thence running East along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter
(SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 275 feet; thence running North parallel with the West line
of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 375 feet;
thence West parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter
(SW ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 275 feet to the West line of said Southeast Quarter of
Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼); thence running South along the West line of said
Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SE ¼ of NW ¼) a distance of 375 feet to the
point of beginning; Anoka County, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein,
IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO:
I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS.
A. Improvements on the project site to be installed at the Developer’s
expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred
to as “On-site Work”.
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 2 of 9
B. Improvements off the project site to be installed at the Developer’s
expense, if any, by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter
referred to as “Off-Site Work”.
II. ON-SITE WORK.
A. On-Site Work. The On-Site Work shall consist of the improvements
described in the approved Plans, to include any approved subsequent
amendments, and shall be in compliance with all applicable statutes, codes
and ordinances of the City. The On-Site Work includes but is not limited
to the erosion control, initial material hauling from existing site in
Centerville, access construction and site restoration.
Such improvements shall be completed in accordance with Section IV
herein.
B. Cost Estimates. The Developer shall provide the City with a written
estimate of all applicable costs of the On-Site Work, itemized by type; the
estimates shall be based upon the actual estimates provided by the
contractors who are to do the Work. Said cost estimates shall be reviewed
by the City, and the City shall establish the actual amount of the financial
guarantee. The description and estimated cost of Developer's On-Site
Work are as follows:
Description of Improvements Estimated Costs
1. Lighting $ 0.00
2. Fences / Screen Structures $ 0.00
3. Trash Disposal Structures $ 0.00
4. Curbing / Islands / Delineators $ 0.00
5. Storm Drainage Systems / Sewers / Catch Basins /
Culverts / Swales $ 0.00
6. Public Trails and / or Sidewalk $ 0.00
7. Private Trials and / or Sidewalk $ 0.00
8. Driveway / Curb cut / Parking Lot / Fire Lane $ 12.500
9. Water mains / Hydrants / Sanitary Sewers $ 0.00
10. Landscaping $ 0.00
11. Site Grading $ 7,500
12. Erosion Control $ 7,500
Total Estimated Cost of Developer Improvements $ 27,500
Security Requirement (Total * 35%) $ 9,625
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 3 of 9
III. DEVELOPER FEES. Not Applicable
Acres Fee
1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Unit Fee ($1,630/unit; 2.92 units/Acre) $0
2. City Sewer Availability Fee ($1,525/SAC Unit) $0
3. Water Trunk Unit Fee ($2,341/unit; 2.92 units/Acre) $0
4. City Water Availability Fee ($1,473/SAC Unit) $0
5. City Surface Water Management Fee ($11,073/Acre) $0
Total Estimated (Budget) Developer Fees $0
IV. RECORD DRAWINGS.
a. Upon project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings in
electronic format verifying the location of the black dirt stockpile. The as-built
survey must include, but is not limited to, proposed and final contours with
adequate elevation shots to show conformance, property irons (to be exposed
in field), and the 100-Year High Water Level (HWL) of all ponds, lakes, and
wetland areas. The files shall be drawn in Anoka County NAD 83 Coordinate
system and provided in both AutoCAD .dwg and Adobe .pdf file formats. The
plans shall include accurate locations, dimensions, elevations, grades, slopes and
all other pertinent information concerning the complete work.
b. No securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been
submitted and accepted by the City Engineer.
V. COMPLETION DATE.
If the activities authorized by site plan approval are not initiated within twelve (12)
months from the final execution of this agreement, then Developer will need to start
the site plan approval process from the beginning. The Developer shall complete all
On Site Work as described in Section II A by November 30, 2022.
The Developer may request a reasonable extension of time from the City. If the
extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the
Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date.
VI. GUARANTEE.
A. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and
conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer.
Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer
will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash
deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on thirty-
five (35%) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's On-site
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 4 of 9
Work. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and
benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is
issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the
terms and conditions of this Development Contract, construction of all
required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and
specifications of the City and guarantees the workmanship and materials
for the landscape improvements for a period of one year following the
City’s acceptance of the landscape improvements. The City reserves the
right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter
of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this
contract, if Developer has been found to be in default of this agreement
and only after providing Developer with written notice and opportunity to
cure any default. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically
extended for additional periods of one year from present or future
expiration dates unless sixty (60) days prior to such the City Clerk or
Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail or overnight mail that
the Letter of Credit will not be renewed.
B. Upon written request, The City will grant a reduction of the Letter of
Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed
improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The Developer may
make such requests three times throughout the life of this agreement, with
the third and/or final request being at the completion of the project. The
City will respond to such request within 30 days time. Prior to the final
acceptance of the Developer’s Improvements the City shall require a
Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow to cover the warranty provisions of the
agreement. The amount shall be agreed to by the City Engineer and
Developer and Developer may use the Letter of Credit discussed in
Section VI.A above.
VII. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS.
A. The Developer agrees to establish a non-interest bearing escrow account
with the City in an amount established by the City Engineer or his
designee for the payment of all City fees and costs incurred by the City
related to the On-site Work, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Site Plan Review Fee $1,500.00
2. Administration
(Legal, Engineering, Planning and Contract Administration) $7,500.00
3. Negative Short Term Escrow Balance $0.00
Total Estimated (Budget) Costs for Escrow Account $9,000.00
B. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate or that
the actual costs incurred will be less than the estimate, then Developer and
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 5 of 9
City shall review the costs required to complete the project. In such case,
if the actual costs exceed the estimate, then Developer shall promptly pay
the additional sums to the City to pay for the agreed upon increase.
However, in such case where the actual costs are less than the estimate,
the City shall promptly reimburse to Developer any amounts overpaid by
the Developer. The Developer may request a statement of the account
each month for review.
C. Per the Conditional Use Permit approved by Resolution 22-30, the City
will maintain a $5,000 non-interest bearing escrow account provided by
the owner that shall be reestablished annually by January 15th. This
escrow will be for inspection, erosion control, and other City costs
associated with the operation of the stockpile.
If the above escrow amount is insufficient, the owner shall make such
additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to
reimburse itself from the Escrow with suitable documentation supporting
the charges.
D. Intentionally Deleted.
VIII. REMEDIES FOR BREACH.
A. The City shall give prior written notice to the Developer of any default
hereunder before proceeding to enforce such financial guarantee or before
the City undertakes any work for which the City will be reimbursed
through the financial guarantee. If within twenty (20) days after receipt of
such written notice to it, the Developer has not notified the City by stating
in writing the manner in which the default will be cured and the time
within which such default will be cured, the City will proceed with the
remedy it deems reasonably appropriate.
B. At any time after the completion date and any extensions thereof, if any of
the work is deemed incomplete, the City may proceed in any one or more
of the following ways to enforce the undertakings herein set forth, and to
collect any and all expenses reasonably incurred by the City in connection
therewith, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal, planning and
litigation costs and expense. The enumeration of the remedies hereunder
shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the City.
1. Specific Performance. The City may in writing direct the surety or
the Developer to cause the Work to be undertaken and completed
within a specified reasonable time. If the Developer fails to cause
the Work to be done and completed in a manner and time
reasonably acceptable to the City, the City may proceed to bring an
action for specific performance to require work to be undertaken.
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 6 of 9
2. Completion by the City. The City, after written notice, may enter
the premises and proceed to have the Work done either by contract,
by day labor or by regular City forces. The Developer may not
question the manner of doing such work or the letting of any such
contracts for the doing of any such work; provided that all such
work is performed in a reasonable manner, the costs are reasonable
and the work is completed in a good and workman-like manner
and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Upon completion of such work, the Developer shall promptly pay
the City the full cost thereof as aforesaid.
3. Deposit of Financial Guarantee. In the event the financial
guarantee has been submitted in the form of a Letter of Credit, the
City may draw on the Letter of Credit the sum equal to the
reasonably estimated cost of completing the Work, plus the City's
reasonably estimated expenses as defined herein, including any
other reasonable costs, expenses, and damages for which the surety
may be liable hereunder, but not exceeding the amount set forth on
the Letter of Credit. The money shall be deemed to be held by the
City for the purpose of reimbursing the City for any reasonable
costs incurred in completing the Work as hereinafter specified.
Any funds remaining after completion of the project shall be
promptly returned to the Developer.
IX. OCCUPATION OF PREMISES. Not Applicable.
X. INSURANCE.
Developer or its general contractor shall take out and maintain until one year after
the City accepted the Developer Improvements, public liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for
property damage which may arise out of the Developer's or general contractor’s
work, as the case may be, or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or
indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be
not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one
person and One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence;
limits for property damage shall be not less than One Million and no/100
($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy
of Two Million and no/100 ($2,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its
employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured on the
policy, and the Developer or its general contractor shall file with the City a
certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate
shall provide that the City must be given ten days advance written notice of the
cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for
failure to give the required notice.
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 7 of 9
XI. REIMBURSEMENT FOR LITIGATION EXPENSES.
The City and Developer agree that the prevailing party in any litigation pertaining
to the enforcement of this Agreement shall be entitled to reimbursement from the
non-prevailing party for all reasonable costs incurred by said prevailing party
including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees.
XII. VALIDITY.
If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this
Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of
the Site Improvement Performance Agreement.
XIII. GENERAL.
A. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and
assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of
all or any part of the Property and shall be deemed covenants running with
the land.
B. Notices. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that
notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to
or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally
or (i) mailed by United States mail by certified mail (return receipt
requested) or (ii) sent by nationally recognized overnight carrier to the
addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1. Such notice or demand shall
be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in
the mail or the overnight carrier in accordance with the above. The
addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by
notices given as above.
C. Incorporation by Reference. All plans, special provisions, proposals,
specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let
pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this
Agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full.
E. Hours of Construction Activity. Construction activity shall be limited to
the hours set out as follows:
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 8 of 9
XIV. VIOLATIONS/BUILDING PERMITS.
In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements
contained in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement and to be performed
by the Developer, the City, at its option, and after providing written notice and
opportunity to cure to Developer in addition to the rights and remedies as set out
hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the
development and/or stop building construction within the development until such
time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City.
DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES
By _________________________ By _________________________
Gerald Rehbein Mayor
ATTEST:
By_________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of
____________, 2022, by Rob Rafferty as Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of
said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of
____________, 2022 by Julianne Bartell as City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes on
behalf of said City.
_______________________________
Notary Public
Rehbeins Black Dirt Site Performance Agreement page 9 of 9
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this _______ day of _______________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared, _______________________________,
who executed the foregoing instrument.
______________________________
Notary Public
This instrument was drafted by:
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: March 14, 2022
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 22-33, Approving Agreement with Rice
Creek Watershed District, Shenandoah Park BMP Feasibility
Study, Michael Grochala
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting City Council approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and authorize a professional services agreement with
WSB and Associates to complete a Best Management Practices(BMP) Feasibility Study for
Shenandoah Park.
BACKGROUND
In 2009-2010 the RCWD, in partnership with the Anoka Conservation District, completed a
Subwatershed Assessment focusing on Rice Lake in the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes. The
purpose of the study was to identify potential subwatershed water quality projects to reduce
runoff volume and sediment/nutrient loading to Rice Lake. The study identified Shenandoah
Park as a prime candidate for additional study in advance of developing a large capital
improvement project.
A private ditch system, maintained by the City runs through the park, under Birch Street, and
discharges into Rice Lake. The ditch serves as the primary stormwater outlet for the residential
neighborhood extending south to Coyote Trail. A majority of the park area is comprised of
partially drained wetland. Staff is of the opinion that opportunity exists for a restoration project
that would enhance water quality and provide for an improved greenway element to the park.
WSB and Associates completed a wetland delineation on the park property in 2021. They have
submitted a proposal to complete the feasibility study and corresponding water quality
modeling in the amount of $21,925.
The Rice Creek Watershed District is proposing to participate in the project. The RCWD’s
share is not to exceed $10,962.50 (50%) of the cost. The RCWD is acting on the proposed
MOU at their March 9, 2022 board meeting.
Funding for the City’s share of the project will come from the Surface Water Management
Fund. This fund was established in 1992 to cover the costs of surface water planning and trunk
facility improvements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 22-33.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Location Map
2. Resolution No. 22-33
3. RCWD MOU
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 22-33
RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH RICE
CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
SHENANDOAH PARK BMP FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, the 2009 Rice Lake Stormwater Retrofit Assessment (SRA), prepared by the Rice
Creek Watershed District and the Anoka Conservation District provided a blueprint to improve
stormwater quality and reduce the volume of runoff entering the stormwater system from
neighborhoods that contribute to the degradation of Rice Lake; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2013 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved the
District’s Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load Study, with the
purpose of quantifying the total phosphorus loading reductions needed for Rice Lake, and others,
to meet state water quality standards; and
WHEREAS, the development of content within the SRA included review and input from other
partners in the Rice Lake Subwatershed, including the City of Lino Lakes and
WHEREAS, the SRA includes a project concept for the City’s Shenandoah Park, suggesting it as
an ideal location to develop a project to improve water quality by reducing total phosphorus
loads and runoff rates, and potentially restoring previously drained wetland areas, collectively
resulting in improvements to Rice Lake; and
WHEREAS, the SRA establishes that a feasibility study including additional engineering and
modeling is required to analyze potential project concepts, and their respective benefits, for
Shenandoah Park (Study); and
WHEREAS, the Study will provide valuable information should either the City or RCWD pursue
external grant funding for a proposed water quality improvement project in Shenandoah Park in
the future; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to proceed with the aforementioned Study to further develop
project concepts for Shenandoah Park; and,
WHEREAS, the RCWD desires to cooperate with the City by providing cost-share assistance for
the Study;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cou ncil of the City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the MOU with the RCWD and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
agreement on behalf of the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City staff are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with WSB for the preparation of the Shenandoah Park BMP Feasibility Study in the
amount of $21,925.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of March, 2022.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
1
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
SHENANDOAH PARK BMP FEASIBILITY STUDY
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) between the Rice Creek Watershed District, 4325
Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611, Blaine, Minnesota 55449 and City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center
Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, in December 2009, the Rice Creek Watershed District (District), in partnership with the Anoka
Conservation District, published the Rice Lake Stormwater Retrofit Assessment (SRA), later revised in
January 2010, with the purpose of providing a blueprint to improve stormwater quality and reduce the
volume of runoff entering the stormwater system from neighborhoods that contribute to the degradation
of Rice Lake;
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved the District’s Lino
Lakes Chain of Lakes Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load Study, with the purpose of quantifying the total
phosphorus loading reductions needed for Rice Lake, and others, to meet state water quality standards;
WHEREAS, the development of content within the SRA included review and input from other partners in
the Rice Lake Subwatershed, including the City of Lino Lakes (City);
WHEREAS, the SRA includes a project concept for the City’s Shenandoah Park, an excerpt of which is
incorporated herein at Attachment A, suggesting it as an ideal location to develop a project to improve
water quality by reducing total phosphorus loads and runoff rates, and potentially restoring previously
drained wetland areas, collectively resulting in improvements to Rice Lake;
WHEREAS, the SRA establishes that a feasibility study including additional engineering and modeling is
required to analyze potential project concepts, and their respective benefits, for Shenandoah Park (Study);
WHEREAS, the Study will provide valuable information should either the City or District pursue external
grant funding for a proposed water quality improvement project in Shenandoah Park in the future;
WHEREAS, the City desires to proceed with the aforementioned Study to further develop project concepts
for Shenandoah Park; and,
WHEREAS, the District desires to cooperate with the City by providing cost-share assistance for the Study;
THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises set forth herein and other good and valuable
consideration, the District and the City agree as follows:
I. GENERAL SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
A. The City agrees to contract for the engineering and modeling work necessary for completion of the
Study. The District agrees to provide partial funding and technical support for this effort.
2
II.SPECIFIC SCOPE OF SERVICES
A.The District and the City agree that it is mutually beneficial to jointly undertake the Study.
1.Specific Tasks Involved. The scope of work will include the specific tasks described in the proposal
provided to the City by WSB & Associate, Inc., dated February 24, 2022, found at Attachment B
to this Agreement (the "Study").
2.Scheduling. All work necessary to carry out the scope of work shall be completed no later than
December 31, 2022.
B.District Responsibilities. The District agrees to:
1.Provide to the City existing reports, surveys, data, and/or models for the Study area and
contributing watershed, pursuant to standard licensing as applicable.
2.Participate in all meetings associated with the Study.
3.Make available its staff to serve as advisors to the Study team.
4.Reimburse the City for a part of the contracted cost of the Study, in an amount equal to 50% of
the cost, not to exceed ten thousand nine hundred sixty-two and 50/100ths dollars ($10,962.50),
upon District acceptance of the Study’s final report content, which will not be unreasonably
withheld.
C.City Responsibilities. The City agrees to:
1.Contract for and manage the necessary professional services to support the Study and the
completion of tasks and subtasks identified in Section II.A.1.
2.Participate in all meetings associated with the Study.
3.Make available its staff to serve as advisors to the Study team.
4.Provide any/all drafts of the Study report to the District for review and comment, including the
final draft of the Study report for District approval.
5.Assume any additional costs required to complete the Study beyond the District contribution
described in Section II.B.4., above.
D.ELIGIBLE COSTS; COMPENSATION; METHOD OF PAYMENT
A.Eligible costs under this Agreement are limited to the cost of the proposal identified in Section II.A.1
(“Eligible Costs”).
B.Upon the District’s acceptance of the Study final report content, and within 30 days of receipt of an
invoice and supporting documentation of Eligible Costs incurred, the District will reimburse the City
for its share of costs incurred for the completion of the Study as identified in Section II.B.4.
3
IV. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective when fully executed by the parties and expires
December 31, 2022.
B. Amendments. The terms of this Agreement may be changed only by execution of written
amendment(s) signed by duly authorized officers of the parties to this Agreement.
C. District Personnel. Kyle Axtell, or such other person as may be designated in writing by the District,
will serve as the District's authorized representative and will assume primary responsibility for
coordinating all services with the City.
D. City Personnel. The City contract manager for purposes of administration of this Agreement is Michael
Grochala (“City Contract Manager”), or such other person as may be designated in writing by the City.
The City Contract Manager will be responsible for coordinating services under this Agreement.
E. Equal Employment Opportunity; Affirmative Action. The City and the District agree to comply with all
applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. In particular, the City and the
District agree not to discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant in
this study because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard
to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or
age; and further agree to take action to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally with
respect to all aspects of employment, including rates of pay, selection for training, and other forms of
compensation.
F. Independent Relationship. No employee, representative, contractor or consultant of either party to
this Agreement acts in any respect as the agent or representative of the other party.
G. Liability. The District will have no role in managing the consultant's contract or directing the
consultant. Neither party shall be liable for the acts or omissions of the other party or the other
party's council or board members, employees or agents, and neither party by this Agreement is
agreeing to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other within the meaning of Minnesota
Statutes §471.59, subdivision 1a(a). Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver or
limitation by either party of any applicable immunity, defense or liability limit under any law including,
without limitation, Minnesota Statutes, section 3.736 (State Tort Claims) and chapter 466 (Municipal
Tort Claims).
H. Copyright. No reports or documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement will be the
subject of an application for or assertion of copyright by or on behalf of the City or District.
I. Use of Work Products. The City and District may use and distribute, without restriction, the work
products resulting from this Agreement, including but not limited to reports and documents. The City
will ensure the consultant's contract stipulates that the raw model products produced by the Study
will comply with the District’s Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Guidelines, dated February 23,
2022, found at Attachment C to this Agreement for incorporation into the District-wide model, and
that the District has a perpetual, cost-free, non-exclusive right to use and distribute those model
products. In addition, the City will provide for the consultant's contract to stipulate, and the City
agrees, that the District has all ownership rights to any derivative products the District produces
therefrom.
4
J. Data Practices. Data provided, produced or obtained under this Agreement shall be administered in
accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.
K. Termination of Agreement. The City and the District will both have the right to terminate this
Agreement at any time and for any reason by submitting written notice of the intention to do so to
the other party. If the City terminates without cause before completion of the work, the District will
not be responsible for any funding obligation under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives on the dates set forth below. This Agreement is effective upon final execution by, and
delivery to, both parties.
Dated: , 2022 CITY OF LINO LAKES
By:
Name:
Its:
Dated: , 2022 RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
By:
Nick Tomczik, Administrator
Rice Lake Subwatershed
Stormwater Retrofit Assessment
Prepared for the Rice Creek Watershed District by
The Anoka Conservation District
With Assistance From:
The Metropolitan Landscape Restoration Program
December, 2009
(Revised January, 2010)
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 38 -
Catchment Summary
Acres 249
Dominant Land Cover Residential, ¼-½ acre lots
Parcels 455
TSS (lb/yr) 39,066
TP (lb/yr) 123.8
Volume (acre-feet/yr) 105.0
Description:
RL-13 is located on the south side of Rice
Lake. The catchment area contains several
developments of single family homes.
Stormwater management in the catchment
area is comprised of a complex network of
catch basins, pipes, ditches and ponds.
Retrofit Recommendation:
Three retrofit possibilities exist in this area:
1. Curb-cut rain gardens: The best option for
treating stormwater in the residential
neighborhoods is with curb-cut rain gardens.
Positioning the rain gardens uphill from the
catch basins will capture stormwater runoff
before it enters ponds, and may improve the
ponds’ ability to treat stormwater by increasing
the residency time.
2. Shenandoah Park: Treatment of ditch water running through the park can be
accomplished by creating a stormwater wetland facility in the unused portion of the
park. Flows from the ditch greater than base conditions could be diverted to the facility
and treated. In addition, the facility could improve the aesthetics of the park and
provide educational opportunities to the public and students at nearby Rice Lake
Elementary. See page 37 for more project details.
3. Pond Modifications: Another retrofit opportunity involves modifying the elevations of
the inlets/outlets of the ponds in the catchment area to provide additional treatment at a
low cost. They could also be assessed for maintenance that could provide additional
storage volume. Due to the interconnectivity of the system and the risk of upland
flooding, pond modifications should be assessed by an engineer.
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 39 -
Treatment Analysis:
The following table summarizes the amount of treatment needed to achieve different
levels of phosphorus reduction. Reductions assume that rain gardens are placed in
ideal locations to capture the maximum amount of stormwater.
70% TP
Reduction
50% TP
Reduction
30% TP
Reduction
10% TP
Reduction
TSS Reduction (lb/yr) 32,477 26,480 19,508 10,193
TSS Reduction (%) 83% 68% 50% 26%
TP Reduction (lb/yr) 86.7 61.9 37.2 12.4
Volume Reduction
(acre-feet/yr) 71.5 53.4 34.1 11.7
Volume Reduction (%) 68% 51% 32% 11%
Live Storage Volume
(cubic feet) 30,511 16,734 7,995 2,187
Rain gardens Needed 305 168 80 22
Materials/Labor $1,067,500 $588,000 $280,000 $77,000
Design Finalization $122,610 $67,536 $32,160 $8,844
Promotion &
Administration Costs $34,815 $19,745 $10,065 $3,685
Total Project Cost $1,224,925 $675,281 $322,225 $89,529
Cost/lb Phosphorus $14,128 $10,909 $8,622 $7,220
Annual O&M $22,875 $12,600 $6,000 $1,650
Term Cost/lb/yr (10 yr) $1,677 $1,294 $1,027 $855
Model Inputs:
Parameter Input
Pervious Curve Number 49
Indirectly Connected Impervious
Fraction
0.12
Directly Connected Impervious
Fraction
0.22
Hydraulic Conductivity 3.39 in/hr
PROJECT 1: Rain Gardens
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 40 -
Site Selection:
In order to maximize the treatment
potential of each rain garden,
properties furthest “downhill” or near a
catch basin should be targeted as high
priority sites. Properties near the high
point in a road or immediately downhill
from a catch basin are low priority
because they will be less likely to
intercept large amounts of stormwater.
The following map highlights high and
low priority properties. Properties not
highlighted can be targeted for rain
garden retrofits if additional treatment
is desired. Lack of landowner
participation and additional site
constraints may eliminate some high
priority properties, and adjacent
upstream properties should be
pursued. See appendix A for curb-cut
rain garden site considerations and
designs.
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 41 -
Description:
The park is located immediately adjacent to
a drainage ditch that drains a large area of
residential properties to the south. The park
is divided into a public space and
playground area in its southern half, and
what appears to be a drained wetland in its
northern half, given the presence of hydric
soils (rapid assessment only) and persistent
vegetation cues.
Retrofit Options:
Restoration of the apparently drained
wetland can provide several benefits
including water quality treatment, rate control, habitat values, potential wetland credit for
the city and public educational and aesthetic benefits. We envision a 3-celled wetland
complex, hydrologically connected to the ditch via 2 adjustable weirs (customized
floatable system) located along the existing ditch channel and with culverts between
cells. Recharge of the wetland will be achieved during medium-to-high ditch flow events
and evapotranspiration will drive drawdown. A secondary component of the design will
include the provision of effective public interfaces that convey information regarding
watershed ecology and human’s place within it. This will include a circuit pathway, node
points for educational interaction and potentially a short section of boardwalk over open
water.
Project Site Summary
Dominant Land Cover Residential
TSS (lb/yr) (Additional modeling
needed)
TP (lb/yr) (Additional modeling
needed)
Volume (acre-feet/yr) (Additional modeling
needed)
PROJECT 2: Shenandoah Park
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 42 -
Treatment/Cost Analysis:
The following table summarizes estimated pollutant load reductions based on the MN
Stormwater Manual.
Pollutant
Removal
Potential
Est. Cost
COST AS DESIGNED $70,000-$80,000
TSS 75%
TP/TN 40%/30%
METALS 40%
BACTERIA 80%
HYDROCARBONS 85%
CATCHMENT PROFILE: RL-13
Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment
- 43 -
Concept Layout
A multiple-celled
wetland
restoration design
that draws and
treats residential
runoff from
neighborhoods to
the south. Self-
adjusting weir
(floats located on
wetland side of
weir adjust to
wetland ponding
elevation) are
located along the
ditch. Culverts will
connect the 3 cells
together with
weirs only being
used along ditch.
G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Shanendoah Park\Phase 2\Proposal_ShenandoahBMP_Phase2_022422final.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM February 24, 2022
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Re: Scope of Work – Shenandoah Park Stormwater Quality BMP Feasibility Study
Dear Mr. Grochala:
WSB is pleased to provide this scope of work and cost estimate to complete a stormwater quality
BMP feasibility study for Shenandoah Park. The goal of the study will be to determine the
feasibility of implementing various stormwater improvements to the existing ditch and drained
wetland area to 1) improve water quality in downstream Rice Lake, 2) enhance the recreational
amenities and educational opportunities within the park and 3) restore and rehabilitate the park
vegetation.
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1: Conceptual Designs Cost: $4,961
WSB will develop schematics for three conceptual-level design options based on discussions with
City staff and using currently available electronic data including storm sewer system GIS
information and as-builts, LiDAR contour data, and the previously completed wetland delineation.
Each design will also include vegetation rehabilitation concepts. One design will be based on the
stormwater wetland concept developed for Shenandoah Park in the 2010 Rice Lake
Subwatershed Stormwater Retrofit Assessment (RLSSR Assessment). At least one other design
concept will incorporate re-meandering of drainage ditch.
Deliverable(s): Conceptual-level GIS figures for three design options.
Task 2: Develop H&H Model Cost: $5,582
An XP-SWMM model will be developed for the drainage area upstream of the culvert crossing at
Birch Street to estimate the impacts to area flood risk and channel hydraulics of the three
conceptual designs developed in Task 1 compared to existing conditions. The XP-SWMM model
will be based on currently available electronic information (LiDAR data, storm sewer as -builts,
and drainage areas from SWAMP). WSB will coordinate with RCWD to ensure the model can be
input into RCWD’s District-wide model and complies with RCWD’s Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Modeling Guidelines (HHMG) dated February 23rd, 2022. This coordination will include “edge-
matching” drainage areas to the RCWD URC (Direct Drainage) boundary per the Catchment
Boundary instructions in the HHMG. In addition, WSB will perform one field visit to measure
existing ditch depth, dimensions and estimate longitudinal slope.
Deliverable(s): Existing and proposed XP-SWMM models for three design options. Shapefile(s)
with subcatchment boundaries and runoff parameters.
Shenandoah Park Stormwater Quality BMP Feasibility Study
February 24, 2022
Page 2
G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Shanendoah Park\Phase
2\Proposal_ShenandoahBMP_Phase2_022422final.docx
Task 3: Develop P8 Models Cost: $3,192
Based on the hydrologic characteristics developed for the XP-SWMM model, P8 models will then
be prepared to estimate pollutant removals for each conceptual design option developed in Task
1. As a foundation, a P8 model will be prepared to estimate existing TP and TSS loads using the
watershed information in the RLSSR Assessment and the pond drainage and pollutant loading
information in the City’s SWAMP system. The existing model will then be modified by
representing the BMP(s) for each proposed design opt ion to quantify annual removal of TP and
TSS. The TP and TSS information generated will be checked against modeling data summarized
in the RLSSR Assessment for RCWD subcatchment RL-13.
Deliverable(s): Existing and proposed P8 Models for three design options.
Task 4: Construction Estimates and Permit Requirements Cost: $3,390
WSB will develop construction cost estimates for each conceptual design option developed in
Task 1. Cost estimates will be developed from previous WSB projects and MnDOT unit pricing.
Permit requirements will also be identified for each option. WSB will calculate the cost per pound
of TP and TSS removed for each of the three options.
Deliverable(s): Cost estimate and permitting requirement tables.
Task 5: Refine Design and Final Feasibility Report Cost: $4,800
After completion of Tasks 1-3, WSB will meet with City and RCWD staff to review the three
design options and select a preferred alternative option. At this meeting, staff will review any
possible improvements to the preferred alternative. Based on the outcome of this meeting, the
information developed for the preferred alternative in Tasks 1-3 will be further refined and
presented in a final feasibility report. Funding opportunities will be identified within the feasibility
study. The study will be submitted to the RCWD for review before finalization. WSB will respond
to one round of RCWD and City comments.
Deliverable(s): Final report.
SCHEDULE AND COST
The cost to complete Tasks 1-5 is not to exceed $21,925. The anticipated work schedule is
assuming a notice to proceed date of March 1st, 2022.
Task Scheduled Completion
1 – Conceptual Designs March 21, 2022
2 – Develop XP-SWMM Model April 15, 2022
3 – Develop P8 Models April 30, 2022
4 – Construction Estimates and
Permit Requirements May 15, 2022
5 – Refine Design and Final
Feasibility Report June 15, 2022
Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me at
(612)246-9346 or thavranek@wsbeng.com if you have any questions or comments.
Shenandoah Park Stormwater Quality BMP Feasibility Study
February 24, 2022
Page 3
G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Shanendoah Park\Phase
2\Proposal_ShenandoahBMP_Phase2_022422final.docx
Sincerely,
Tony Havranek
Director of Fisheries/Principal
PAGE 1 OF 2
Technical Memorandum
To: Rice Creek Watershed District Model User
From: Bret Zimmerman PE; Houston Engineering, Inc.
Through: Chris Otterness PE; Houston Engineering, Inc.
CC: Nick Tomczik; Rice Creek Watershed District Administrator
Subject: Rice Creek Watershed District – Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Guidelines
Date: February 23, 2022
BACKGROUND
The Rice Creek Watershed District (District) currently maintains hydrologic and hydraulic models for the
watershed through the District Wide Modeling Program (DWMP). These models and products were originally
completed in 2011. The initial model development methodology was presented in a 2011 report titled Hydraulic
and Hydrologic Modeling Report Rice Creek1. The original 15 models developed in various modeling software
including InfoSWMM, Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis (ASSA), and HEC-RAS.
The District maintains and updates the models through the DWMP on an annual basis. The main purpose of the
annual updates is to incorporate projects that have been implemented within the watershed. Several other
updates have been made to the models including software conversions, combining smaller models, methodology
updates to conform to industry standards. There are currently a total of 11 hydrologic and hydraulic models that
are maintained as part of the DWMP. Table 1 shows the current modeling software and software version for the
Rice Creek Models.
Table 1: RCWD Models and Modeling Software
Model Modeling Software Software Version
ACD 10-22-32 XPSWMM 2018.1
ACD 31 AutoDesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2020
ACD 46 AutoDesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2020
ACD 15 JD 4 AutoDesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2020
ACD 25 InfoSWMM 13.0 Service Pack 1 Update #2
JD2 (HWC) XPSWMM 2018.1
JD3 (CWC) XPSWMM 2018.1
LRC (Merged) XPSWMM 2018.1
RCD 2345 XPSWMM 2018.1
URC (Direct Drainage) InfoSWMM 13.0 Service Pack 1 Update #2
HEC-RAS HEC-RAS 5.0.6
1 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling Report – Rice Creek; Houston Engineering, Inc.; December 23, 2011
PAGE 2 OF 2
MODELING GUIDELINES
The following set of modeling guidelines has been prepared for reference for partners of the District. The
guidelines provide a description of some of the methodologies used to develop inputs for the maintained DWMP
products. Conforming to the following guidelines will allow RCWD to incorporate relevant third-party changes into
the DWMP.
VERTICAL DATUM
All elevations within the models are in reference to North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88).
CATCHMENT BOUNDARIES
The third-party users shall use the RCWD subcatchments shapefile as an initial starting point. Any subdivision of
catchments will edge match to the RCWD subcatchment shapefile at the outer boundary of the study area.
Per request, the District can provide the following shapefiles:
· Subcatchment boundaries
HYDROLOGY
The SWMM models were developed using SCS hydrology method further defined below.
Time of Concentration
Time of Concentrations were estimated using methods described in Chapter 15, Part 630 Hydrology, National
Engineering Handbook (NRCS, 2010).
Curve Numbers
Land use data and soil data were used to develop pervious Curve Number grids, impervious percentage grids,
and a composite Curve Number grid. Area-weighted calculations using GIS tools can be performed on the
Composite CN grid to develop CN values for each catchment.
Per request, the District can provide the following gridded data sets:
· Pervious Curve Number
· Impervious Percentage
· Composite Curve Number
RAINFALL DATA
NOAA Atlas 14 (Volume 8, NWS; 2013) rainfall depths are used to simulate the 2-year, 10-year, 100-year, and
500-year, 24-hour rainfall events. The rainfall events are simulated with a temporal distribution known as MSE3.
In addition to the Atlas 14 rainfall events, a 10-day event is simulated to represent a runoff condition. The 100-
year, 10-day runoff event is generated using an SCS Type I distribution with a total runoff depth of 7.2”. Models
provided to the District shall be run for the 2-, 10-, 100-, and 500-year rainfall events.
Per request, RCWD can provide
· Atlas 14 Rainfall depths
· MSE3 Temporal distribution
MODEL GEOMETRY
Culverts, channels, and other structures added to the model shall be based on as-built survey data. Points of
overflow for 500-year and lower rainfalls shall be discreetly modeled and may be based on LiDAR elevation data.
STARTING WATER ELEVATION
Starting water elevation in ponds and basins shall be set at the lowest pond outlet elevation, except:
· For locations of HSG A or B soil, starting water elevation may be at the bottom of the basin.
· Historic water level data may be used to establish the starting water level.