HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-02-1993 Charter Agenda r
tAJ
"1 ;
AGENDA
LINO LAKES CHARTER COMMISSION
Thursday, December 2, 1993
7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2 . Adopt Minutes:
A. October 27, 1993
3 . Consider Amending By-Laws
4. Review of Apollo Drive Project to Determine How the Project
Worked in Relationship to the Existing City Charter
5. Consider 1994 Charter Commission Budget
6. Consider Additional Topics for Charter Commission Review in
1994, Darrell Schneider
7 . Set Agenda for Next Meeting
8. Adjourn
INCLUDED IN PACKET:
A. Minutes, October 27, 1993
B. Proposed 1994 Charter Commission Budget.
C. Detail of Charter Commission expenditures for 1993 .
D. Additional Billing from Ron Batty, Holmes & Graven, not
yet paid.
MINUTES
CHARTER COMMISSION OF LINO LAKES, MN
OCTOBER 27, 1993
LINO LAKES CITY HALL
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 pm by Chair Patrick Smith
2. Roll Call
Present were Mark Benson, William Bohjanen, Steven Bruns, Robert Doocy, William Houle,
Jennifer Karmann, Richard Lafond, Judith Michaud, Joyce Scharpen, Patrick Smith, Ronald Solfest
Also present was Brian Wessel, Chair, Economic Development Authority Advisory Board
(EDAAB)
3. Adopt Minutes
Minutes of September 1, September 14 and September 15 meetings were approved as
presented.
4. New Officers
Officers of the Commission were elected: Patrick Smith, Chair; Ronald Solfest, Vice Chair;
Robert Doocy, Secretary
5. A copy of the Mounds View charter's by-laws, with "Lino Lakes" inserted where Mounds View
was indicated, was presented. The by-laws were approved as presented.
fi. Old Business
Invoice from Holmes & Graven, bond attorneys, could not be negotiated. Payment of the
invoice, held over from the September 1 meeting, was approved.
Amendment to the City Charter, dated 27 October 1993, was presented by EDAAB Chair
Brian Wessel. Amendment was approved as presented with the request to City Council that they
personally contact each affected homeowner on an individual basis to mitigate any tax ramification
that the homeowner might have, at the Council's discretion.
7. New Business
Charter members requested the Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary to gather information on the
Apollo Park development to see how petitions were handled and financing secured and report at the
next meeting.
Next meeting will be Thursday, December 2, 1993, 7:00 pm, Lino Lakes City Hall
The Agenda for the next meeting was discussed
8. Adjourn
Meeting was adjourned at 9:25 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Robert Doocy, Secretary
/I qL�
ACTUAL 1993 RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION 10/31/93 BUDGET Difference BUDGET
41950 CHARTER COMMISSION
SUPPLIES
200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 100 94 100
6 100 100
OTHER SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
170 TRAVEL AND TUITION 10 0 (10) 0
201 SALES TAX 10 0 (10) 0
300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,776 2,000 224 1,000
320 COMMUNICATIONS 28 50 22 50
340 ADVERTISING 1,234 1,100 (134) 100
341 LEGAL NOTICES 12 100 88 100
3,070 3,250 180 1,250
TOTAL CHARTER COMMISSION 3,077 3,350 273 1,350
This reports reflects expenditures as of 10-31 -93. Not reflected in this report are
expenditures paid as of November 8, 1993. They are as follows:
Holmes and Graven—Attorney Costs $639.00
ECM—Advertising Costs 11.20
Circulating Pines—Advertising Costs 11.25
Press Publications—Advertising Costs 6.00
Total November Costs $667.45
Page 1
HOLMES & GRAVENCHARTERED
"�Pillsbury Center,����Minnesota 5501
Telephone wo2/xm-9mm ~
, -c{�
��, _ � v �n.
-^/ �O� -°u
'~' 4/�/ `
.,��/ �
CLI ENT SUMMARY -=
CITY OF LIN0 LAKES October 22, 1993-1
1189 MAIN ST
LINO LAKES MN 55014-2123
FED. I. D. 41-1225694
_________________________________________________________________________
Matter Services Disb. Total
---------------------------------------------------------_________________
Client LN140 Totals : $1. 118. 50 $1 50 $1, 120' 80
'
/-\
~ {�J
�.�-
�^`-^�/��^~v-�
\ |�� �-'
|dc:��un'depeia�cfbm
rc co��dumnrd+mnn
}u�tan�cz,n�a�d���:npa�
�
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55M
Telephone 011/337-9300
October 22, 1993
INVOICE tf 43598
CITY OF L I N€3 LAMES LN 140: v
1189 MAIN ST
LINO LAMES MN 55014-2123
Re: Special Assaa-sment Rroced sre-s
For All Legal Services Rendered Through September 30, 1993 As Follows:
09/10/93 Phone call with B Wessel re charter 0 24
amendment
09/1.3/93 Phone tall with B Wessel; office 1. 40
conference with C LeFevere; draft
contract
09/14/93 Draft documents for tB Wessel and fax Ir. 15 f
09/15/93 Phone tall with B Wessel re amendment O_ 40
09/23/93 Phone call with u Wessel re charter; 1. 50
phone calls with Hawkins and
Schumacher; work on amendments
QR 24/93 Phone call with Schumacher; revise 1. 00
charter amendment
Total Services: 5, 10
For All Diibursements As Fallows:
Fax 1- 50
T�t.aa I}islzurse:�en�:s: �Z._ `pis
ADDITIONAL TOPICS
FOR CHARTER COMMISSION REVIEW IN 1994
1. Section 8.04 - "A period of 60 days shall lapse after the
public hearing before any further action shall be taken by the
City Council on the proposed improvement" .
This is a long period of time and stops a project completely
during that time. A 30 day waiting period would allow
sufficient time for any petitions against an improvement.
2 . Section 8 . 04 - "All improvements to be paid for by special
assessments against the benefitted property shall be
instituted by either, (1) a petition of at least twenty-five
percent (25%) in number of the benefitted property
owners. . . . . . . . " .
The Charter does not provide for a fee for the cost of
obtaining a project cost estimate (feasibility study) .
Sometimes the fee for the cost estimate can be as much as
twenty-five hundred dollars ($2, 500. 00) . When the costs are
known and the public hearing is conducted, the landowners can
petition against the project. If they petition against the
improvement, there are no assessments or any other funds to
pay for the feasibility study. The Charter says such costs
cannot come from the General Fund. The suggestion is to amend
the City Charter to include a certain fee for a feasibility
study.
3 . Section 4. 05, Subd. 2 This subdivision requires that the
Clerk-Treasurer give 60 days published notice prior to a special
election. Subd. 1 requires that the election be held within 90
days. This allows less than 30 days for absentee balloting. Also
state statutes require that there be eight (8) weeks between the
last day for filing affidavits of candidacy for office and the
actual election day. This requirement cannot be met if current
Charter requirements are enforced. A proposal for Charter
amendment could be as follows:
1. Once a vacancy occurs, the special election shall be set 100
days from the date of vacancy.
2 . The City Clerk-Treasurer shall give immediate notice of the
special election.
3 . The Clerk-Treasurer shall give published notice that candidate
affidavits shall be accepted no earlier than 70 days and no
later than 56 days before the election. (Per state statute)
This allows for a 30 day notice of special election.
4. The Clerk-Treasurer shall publish the notice of special
election and a sample ballots twice in the legal newspaper
with the last notice no earlier than two (2) weeks prior to
the special election. (State statute requires that two (2)
weeks' published notice, and also ten days' posted notice of
the election be given. )
other suggestions to meet the required absentee balloting period
would be acceptable.