HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-04-2020 Council Work Session Minutes CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
1 CITY OF LINO LAKES
2 MINUTES
3
4 DATE May 4 , 2020
5 TIME STARTED 6 : 00 p .m .
6 TIME ENDED : 11 : 00 P . M .
7 MEMBERS PRESENT Council Member Stoesz, Lyden , Ruhland,
8 Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty
9 MEMBERS ABSENT None
10 Staff members present : City Administrator Jeff Karlson ; Community Development
11 Director Michael Grochala; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; Finance Director
12 Sarah Cotton; City Planner Katie Larsen ; Human Resources Manager Karissa
13 Bartholomew; Public Services Director DeGardner; and City Clerk Julie Bartell
14
15 The council meeting was held electronically on the Zoom Meeting platform and as
16 allowed by Minnesota Statutes 13D . 021 .
17
18 Annual Board of Appeal and Equalization Hearing, Council Chambers (see separate
19 minutes)
20 1 . Item 1 was deleted from the agenda prior to the meeting .
21 2 . Nadeau Acres — City Planner Larsen reviewed a PowerPoint presentation
22 including information on the following :
23 - Review of Rezoning and Preliminary Plats in March ;
24 - Questions on rezoning , future park development and stormwater management;
25 revised plans have been submitted;
26 - Review of Original Preliminary Plat;
27 - Review of Zoning Requirements ;
28 - Rezoning from Rural to Single Family Residential ;
29 - Guided to low density ;
30 - Staff encouraged R- 1 ( Single Family Residential ) based on locale and future
31 consideration ;
32 - Physical characteristics of the site ;
33 - Future park (not in Nadeau Acres) and where that is planned;
34 - Drainage summary — stormwater management plan (what ' s included, what ' s
35 considered, design) ; Plan has been reviewed by City and Rice Creek Watershed
36 District;
37 - A map showing the original stormwater management plan;
38 - A map and information on the revised stormwater management plan ;
39 - The watershed district gave conditional approval to the stormwater management
40 plan ;
41 - Adjacent property owner concerns on drainage addressed through communication ;
1
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
42 - Review of existing ditch system (on map) and summary of drainage plans ;
43 - Council action requested and advisory board actions and public comments .
44 Mayor Rafferty asked about the 2 - 1 vote of the Planning and Zoning Board . Ms . Larsen
45 noted that the board is at 5 members and 2 were absent. Ms . Larsen said the nay voter
46 didn' t make specific comments .
47
48 Mayor Rafferty noted the NE corner and the possibility of the culvert. Is staff concerned
49 that the culvert wasn ' t possible due to an easement situation . Ms . Hankee explained the
50 plunge pool dissipater and, after review, staff doesn' t have concerns about the design .
51 Council Member Stoesz asked about the width of the road and how it compares to
52 NorthPoine roadways ; will there be any parking restrictions? Ms . Hankee noted that
53 nearby Red Oak has a landscaped median but that is not planned for this development.
54 Staff has ensured that streets will align . Ms . Hankee also noted traffic restrictions that
55 will be included. There will be no parking in the area of the turn lanes . Ms . Larsen
56 added that the roads in general are 32 ' wide and here is no variance planned for this
57 development.
58 Council Member Lyden noted that there are legitimate concerns that need to be heard.
59 There are eight total acres being drained by rocks to a ditch . It bothers him that it will be
60 drained to a private ditch and therefore some responsibility falls to the owner of that
61 ditch . He has looked at elevations in the area and how that will drain . He hears
62 engineers speak about rate of drain but he prefers to discuss volume . This involves a
63 field and it ' s important to consider the volume of water proposed and the distance over
64 which the drop will occur . Considering those elements , this should be a drop of about
65 eleven feet rather than close to one foot . If that property was to flood, it ' s private
66 property so it would be the owner ' s responsibility . He has other concerns as well .
67 Mayor Rafferty asked about the source of Mr . Lyden ' s technical information .
68 Councilmember Lyden noted the information is based on what he believes is an
69 engineer ' s standard.
70 Linda Broussard and David Vickers , own and live on the farm west of the
71 development. Ms . Broussard asked the City Engineer if she is aware of the holding
72 volume of the pond. She ' s noted that the original plan called for a deeper and smaller
73 pond . Total square footage was increased in the new ponds . Another question she has ,
74 looking at the 2030 Comprehensive Plan , she believes their acreage is supposed to be
75 staged for sewer in 2030 (they own all of the property on the western side of the proposed
76 development) . Their primary concern is to lose production in the field (due to water) and
77 additional cost to them if there is erosion . They have about 40 or 50 feet where the water
78 flows over the ground and over years the pond will not stay the same depth ; pond
79 cleaning is very expensive and a difference will impact water on their property . While
80 the water naturally flows to their property , currently it comes from a large area rather than
81 the proposed ditch.
82
2
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
83 City Engineer Hankee explained that the drainage areas to pond remain the same . She
84 doesn ' t have the numbers tonight on volume change but the way the pond works is that
85 you have acres of impervious surface being added that will cause the water to flow more
86 quickly ; it moves to a pond and it leaves the site from there ; a larger pond lowers the rate .
87 Ms . Broussard asked at what point the water starts moving toward the dissipater Ms .
88 Hankee explained at what point the water would flow from the pond (as indicated in the
89 plans) . Ms . Broussard wondered if they will have constant flow to their property .
90 City Planner Larsen noted, regarding the utility staging, that the property would be
91 included in the 2025 to 2030 area.
92 Councilmember Cavegn noted the issue of erosion that lays with the property owner . He
93 sees that as a burden and perhaps unfair . He wonders if there are other options . City
94 Engineer Hankee explained that the applicant has met the requirements for storm water
95 management ; the runoff rates to that site are being reduced . She wants to better
96 understand the concern. Councilmember Cavegn explained that there is a large amount
97 of water flowing to a certain amount of property and he believes that the concentration of
98 the flow will cause erosion . Ms . Hankee said the rate will be controlled with the ponding
99 system whereas currently it would come all at once ; there shouldn ' t be a large surface
100 flow . Councilmember Cavegn asked if there are currently erosion issues and Mr .
101 Vickers explained the current situation and his concern about where the dirt will land and
102 he believes that it will be in the ditch and in turn the water in the ditch will be elevated.
103 The impact will be on the yield of crops planted on his property . It isn ' t right for him to
104 incur the cost of maintenance . Ms . Hankee explained that the dissipater will take out the
105 sediment, noting that is what has happened in fact in the NorthPointe area. Community
106 Development Director Grochala said he believes the concern is erosion caused from the
107 dissipater to the ditch and will that cause erosion ; he believes there can be information
108 provided to ensure that isn ' t a problem . Mr . Grochala suggested an easement in a certain
109 area to the City of Lino Lakes to ensure that maintenance occurs . Ms . Broussard
110 explained that any easement has to receive consent of Xcel Energy as well as the
111 watershed district; past that, she thinks that something they would discuss .
112 Mayor Rafferty noted that the developer has an engineer providing information that is
113 reviewed by the City ' s engineer . Staff is suggesting an easement agreement to ensure
114 certain maintenance . He is interested in seeing the resident ' s concerns addressed .
115 Community Development Director Grochala said staff will explore the easement and
116 address the residents ' concerns .
117 Councilmember Lyden wondered if this development would be a better quality of
118 neighborhood if it were zoned Rlx ; his personal preference is that. Also , on the park , he
119 doesn ' t think it ' s realistic for kids to travel across 201h Street to a park. His suggestion is ,
120 in the first staging area, leave a couple of pads as open space initially and until
121 development of a park . Another concern is that cul de sacs are limited in length by city
122 ordinance and he believes this development is in violation . Mayor Rafferty noted that
3
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
123 the lots average about 12 , 000 square feet and that is larger than his home . He appreciates
124 Councilmember Lyden ' s comments .
125 City Planner Larsen clarified that the cul de sac is temporary . City Planner Larsen also
126 explained the staging situation. Currently the area is zoned rural , guided for low density
127 residential at which time rezoning occurs . Staff reviewed square footages for R- 1 versus
128 R- lx zoning .
129 Mayor Rafferty echoed concerns about the lack of park development . Councilmember
130 Cavegn suggested that there are four or five outlots but it was pointed out that they are
131 not of any scale and are in fact mainly ponds or trails .
132
133 Mayor Rafferty asked that staff continue to meet with the Broussard-Vickers and attempt
134 to address their concerns .
135 Councilmember Ruhland suggested that the council may want to check out the
136 NorthPointe system that is similar to what is proposed . Ms . Hankee offered to provide
137 more information, including the local of a dissipater that is in place .
138 3 . Lyngblomsten PUD Amendment # 1 — City Planner Larsen reviewed a
139 Powerpoint presentation including information on the following :
140 - History of the Lyngblomsten project and the master planning for the area;
141 - In 2019 the council approved the PUD for the phased Lyngblomsten proposal ;
142 - Elements included in the developments (cottage homes , senior campus , club house,
143 restaurant and commercial development) ;
144 - Buffer provided for adjacent residential properties ;
145 - Architectural element overview;
146 - As final plans came together, developer sees the need for additional stormwater
147 ponding ; looking at the elimination of the clubhouse and associated parking lot;
148 - The clubhouse was planned for use by residents and others and Lyngblomsten is
149 proposing to add 8 , 000 square feet to the common area in the senior living facility ;
150 - Planning & Zoning Board review and comments heard on landscaping, an element
151 that staff will continue to work on in final planning ; board recommended approval of
152 the clubhouse change ;
153 - Actions requested of council (amending plans to remove clubhouse and enlarge
154 stormwater) .
155 Councilmember Lyden received clarification that there is some underground parking .
156 Also he is interested in seeing a "welcome to Lino Lakes sign" in the area and Ms . Larsen
157 said there is a monument sign included in the development plans .
158
159 Councilmember Stoesz asked about the trail in the area that stubs to nothing; who will
160 maintain that trail . Director Grochala said maintenance falls to the City .
161 Councilmember Stoesz also received an explanation of what roads will be private and
162 which will be public and how they will be signed. He also received verification that
4
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
163 elimination of the clubhouse will not change the tax increment financing plan proposed .
164
165 Mayor Rafferty remarked that he ' s watched this development come forward, it ' s a quality
166 project and the developers (architects) are top notch. The council will consider action at
167 the upcoming council meeting .
168 4 . City Administrator Hiring Process — Human Resources Manager Bartholomew
169 reviewed the process proposed to fill the City Administrator position when current
17o Administrator Jeff Karlson retires in August. She reviewed, item by item, the tentative
171 employment agreement. Much of what is included mirrors the current administrator ' s
172 contract and the City ' s personnel policies . She is looking for direction on compensation .
173
174 Mayor Rafferty asked staff to research what other cities are providing in the area of the
175 car allowance . Ms . Bartholomew noted that information she ' s seen shows the auto
176 allowance is pretty standard; Mr . Karlson concurred adding that the amount may be low
177 since it hasn ' t changed for many years .
178
179 Councilmember Stoesz remarked that in the private sector cell phone allowance is
180 unusual because the phones are now so prevalent and use unlimited. Mayor Rafferty
181 suggested that it could be seen as reimbursement for the portion of your phone that you
182 use for business .
183
184 Councilmember Stoesz wondered if it ' s appropriate to include language on inappropriate
185 activities such as on social media. Ms . Bartholomew suggested that falls under other
186 policy such as the City ' s social media policy .
187
188 Councilmember Cavegn asked about the compensation steps ; Ms . Bartholomew indicated
189 that steps moving forward would be based on performance and council authorization .
190 Councilmember Ruhland asked Mr . Karlson if he has any recommendations .
191 Administrator Karlson said that feedback is very important; expectations are important to
192 understand . Also it ' s important for the council to hear the administrator ' s opinion .
193
194 Councilmember Lyden noted how excited he is that Ms . Cotton will apply for this job ;
195 it ' s a wonderful opportunity for the City . He is respectful of the Mayor ' s role in working
196 the most with the administrator.
197
198 Mayor Rafferty said he isn ' t comfortable talking about compensation at this point. He
199 would like to have more time to review and to also to hear from Ms . Cotton.
200
201 Mayor Rafferty asked for more information on accrued time . It would be beneficial for
202 the council to understand that element also . He feels it ' s important to use vacation time
203 in the manner that it ' s intended; important for employees to have breaks . He also
204 recommends that councilmembers contact staff individually for questions that may be
205 easier answered in that way .
206
5
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
207 Councilmember Lyden asked for Ms . Cotton ' s perspective on the position. That will be
208 clarified with the next agenda item .
209 5 . Review of Finance Director Position — Human Resources Manager
210 Bartholomew reviewed her written report, including options for hiring a new Finance
211 Director (option one) or the reorganization of job duties (option two) . Option two
212 represents what Ms . Cotton would envision as necessary if the Finance Director position
213 were not filled . The report also revisits the possibility of adding a Communications
214 Specialist position . She reviewed cost impacts (savings) related to the reorganization
215 option.
216
217 Finance Director Cotton explained her thoughts about the second option . She feels that
218 it is feasible but with reorganization. She explained the functions that she feels could be
219 transferred to a finance manager position and the experience of one current employee that
220 would make it feasible . She has prepared job descriptions redistributing duties . Option
221 two would create a weave that in the long term would have an administrator position that
222 could require skills that may be hard to find.
223
224 Mayor Rafferty said he doesn ' t want the administrator to be overburdened but also
225 understands that you don ' t take the finance out of someone coming from that background .
226 It ' s important to hear Ms . Cotton ' s opinion . He has some concern about the
227 Communications positions being brought in again ; the council discussed those duties
228 being handled by current staff.
229
230 Councilmember Stoesz noted that Ms . Cotton has served as the IT manager for the City
231 as well and he ' d like to understand that commitment. Ms . Cotton explained the duties
232 and suggested it probably takes about 10 percent of her time ; she would intend that the
233 finance manager would take over that duty .
234
235 Councilmember Ruhland echoed the Mayor ' s remark about handling communications
236 with current staff. He asked for Ms . Cotton ' s opinion on the options . Ms . Cotton said
237 the reason the council is seeing the communications piece is that it is a component of the
238 proposed reorganization; her opinion is that in order to be successful , all the pieces would
239 have to be in place . She explained the value of a communications position and
240 specifically that is creating content.
241
242 Councilmember Cavegn said he recognizes the appeal of the savings but pointed out the
243 difficulty of replacement and also that the ease of this transition is really about having a
244 finance director that moves ahead; that wouldn ' t be the case .
245
246 Administrator Karlson added that in Tracy Thouma and Karissa Bartholomew, the City
247 would have people who could certainly have come up the pipeline .
248
249 Mayor Rafferty remarked that it ' s a compliment to Ms . Cotton that the council considers
250 her so capable to consider dual roles . He thinks the communications position as well as
6
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
251 the option of reorganization are things to continue discussing .
252
253 Councilmember Ruhland mentioned the issue of compensation and how that would
254 reflect dual roles . Administrator Karlson remarked that for an individual taking on more
255 responsibility, the increase is generally in the range of ten percent.
256
257 Councilmember Stoesz asked if a base plus bonus option would be appropriate , with the
258 bonus tied to metrics . Ms . Bartholomew said she hasn ' t heard of a city administrator
259 salary bonus system . Administrator Karlson explained that you cannot offer a bonus in a
260 public employee system ; you can offer merit pay but it ' s very unusual and would
261 normally be a lump sum in a performance program .
262
263 Councilmember Lyden asked for a recommendation from Ms . Bartholomew for an
264 appropriate salary for the administrator position ; she responded that she concurs with Mr.
265 Karlson that the ten percent range is appropriate .
266
267 Mayor Rafferty said the discussion has been valuable and questions have been asked . At
268 this point, he ' d like to stop negotiating and move to thought process and eventually come
269 back to it . When asked about a delay, Ms . Cotton noted her concern about the need to
270 either seek a finance officer or start a reorganization . Mayor Rafferty noted that he has
271 no interest in the first option so that is information that may assist in planning for the next
272 discussion .
273 6 . Ambulance Service — Public Safety Director Swenson explained that staff is
274 ready to bring a recommendation forward on this matter and the background is included
275 in the staff report . On June 1 , 2020 the current ambulance provider (North Memorial)
276 will no longer be providing services in this area. The ESAB has not rendered a decision
277 on the type of change the City faces but the City must move . Staff has found that there is
278 an ambulance service overlap which means the City can choose from two available
279 providers , M Health Fairview and Allina. Staff is recommending Allina services
280 effective June 1 . Allina Ambulance Service has a long history in the area and has
281 received positive comments from cities they serve throughout the county . Their dispatch
282 services will work well . The City has conversed with Allina on the matters of: 1 )
283 training they will provide ; and 2) lease of space for an ambulance and crew out of Fire
284 Station No . 1 . There will be some positive redundancy in ambulance presence due to
285 their services in other areas of the county. He noted the lease fee proposed.
286
287 Mayor Rafferty received information clarifying the current leasing situation with North
288 Memorial , allowing space for one ambulance and one crew at either Station No . 1 or
289 Station No . 2 . Allina is not interested in utilizing Station No . 1 as they have facilities in
290 Vadnais Heights . Mayor Rafferty asked to understand better the lease fee and Director
291 Swenson said the lease revenue the City would receive would decrease by around $ 500
292 per month . Mayor Rafferty asked if the remodeling at Station No . 1 is completed and
293 Director Swenson said yes and explained what areas an ambulance crew would use .
294
7
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
295 Councilmember Stoesz asked, is there is a point where the City insists on a higher rent
296 and the provider then could chooses to not cover the area. Director Swenson said the
297 choice to not accept the agreement would mean going with a different provider; he
298 pointed out that the priority has to be having the best service provider. Mayor Rafferty
299 concurred that the best situation for the City and its residents is the goal .
300
301 The council concurred that an action on the matter will be added to the council agenda.
.3 7 . Advisory Board Appointments — Administrator Karlson noted the advisory
303 board information presented in the staff report . Staff is asking if the council is ready to
304 establish a process for filling the positions . The council concurred that they would
305 interview only for boards were there are more applicants than openings (that would be
306 only the Planning and Zoning Board) . Council Member Stoesz added that the council
307 should make themselves available for feedback if applicants would like that contact and
308 also plan to have an all -board/city council joint meeting whenever that becomes feasible .
309 The council is available for a Zoom meeting and staff will set up 20 minute interviews .
310 8 . Annual License Fee Refunds — City Clerk Bartell addressed the council
311 regarding business licenses and fees . The City is currently in the process of renewing
312 licenses and staff has heard from licenses holders about the impact of not being able to
313 operate and use their licenses . State law does allow cities to refund fees under
314 circumstances that are not controlled by the business owners . The options presented are :
315 a) to provide a fee refund on a monthly pro rata basis for months that businesses were not
316 able to operate ; and b) allow businesses to pay one half of their fee upon application and
317 the other half midway into their license period . Ms . Bartell noted the licenses involved.
318
.3 Mayor Rafferty spoke in favor of the fee changes ; it represents doing what is right under
320 the current circumstances .
321
322 Councilmember Cavegn noted that the active peddler license is for tree care and maybe
323 they wouldn ' t benefit from an extension since that activity is seasonal . Ms . Bartell
324 indicated that staff would intend to be flexible and work with licensees so that they can
325 benefit from the spirit these changes .
326
327 Councilmember Lyden asked if this is consistent with what other cities are doing . Ms .
328 Bartell said she ' s checked with other cities and has found that, across the board, there
329 isn ' t a real standard but she ' s seen cities deciding on things that are right for their
330 communities in ways that are similar to what is being presented to the council .
331
332 The council concurred that they support the fee changes and they will consider formal
333 action at the next council meetings .
334 9. 2021 Budget Calendar/Priorities — Finance Director Cotton reviewed a
335 proposed budget calendar. The first budget work session is proposed for July 27tn
336 Another option would be to have it as an item on the August work session but that may be
337 a late start. Secondly , she noted information received from the county indicating an
8
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
338 approximate 5 % increase in the City ' s taxable value , resulting in a preliminary estimate
339 of a levy increase of $ 530 , 000 without raising the tax rate . She noted factors that will
340 have to be considered moving forward to budget consideration (i . e . past use of reserves ,
341 inflationary increases , personnel changes) . This is an opportunity for the council to
342 inform staff of any priorities and strategies for the coming year ' s budget, noting that a
343 previously planned strategy session was cancelled due to the current emergency .
344 The council discussed briefly the general fund reserve and one time funds that were
345 utilized for the 2020 budget.
346
.1 The council concurred that they would plan to have a special session on July 27th
348 following the regular council meeting.
349 10 . 2021 — 2024 Five-Year Street Reconstruction Plan — Community Development
350 Director Grochala reviewed the three elements of the City ' s pavement management plan
351 - preventive management (funded through the City ' s annual budget) , preservation and
352 rehabilitation (annual overlay projects) and street reconstruction (bigger projects — full
353 reconstruction, funded through bonding) . He is addressing that third element. He
354 explained that the City normally undertakes a project every three years (next one being in
355 2021 ) . In order to use street reconstruction bonds for these projects , plans must be made
356 ahead that allows for required process . A public hearing would be required by July 1 of
357 this year . He noted a plan currently under consideration for 2021 and 2024 (2024 would
358 be revisited) . The recommendations are based on pavement ratings and specifically on
359 streets that are found on the low end of the rating scale . He added that the streets
360 presented may not be possible to accomplish in the two projects but that will be decided
361 as costs become clearer . He is requesting authorization to proceed with the staff work
362 necessary to bring additional information forward in June .
363 Mayor Reinert asked staff, what is the root of the concern that everything can ' t be done
364 and Mr. Grochala explained that it comes down to funds and, with that in mind, he will
365 be working with the City Engineer to make sure costs presented to the public for each
366 project are as accurate as possible . The mayor asked that the council receive a map
367 indicating the location of all proposed projects .
368
369 Councilmember Lyden asked about the streets where sewer doesn ' t exist; is staff
370 considering the possibility that those streets could be dug up in the future ? Community
371 Development Director Grochala said that sewer is considered within each project as
372 information becomes available .
373 Councilmember Ruhland asked how assessments are handled. Mr. Grochala noted that
374 the cost of street construction is not assessed ; sewer and water is assessed and can be
375 spread over a fifteen year period.
376 Councilmember Stoesz asked if home value increase with street reconstruction and Mr .
377 Grochala suggested it is difficult to pinpoint but is possibly in the $ 3 , 000 to $ 5 , 000 range .
9
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
378 Councilmember Cavegn asked if the streets presented are the total of streets in the
379 problem category . Mr. Grochala noted on a city map that there are about 14 miles of
380 streets in poor condition and explained streets that will be receiving overlays and those
381 recommended for reconstruction. The program is basically just over 2 miles each year.
382 The council concurred that staff should move forward with preparing plans .
383 110 Portable Rest Rooms — Councilmember Stoesz explained that he ' s been in the
384 community and has seen many bathrooms closed that were once available to the public .
'I Public Services Director DeGardner recalled that the City ' s contract for portable
386 restrooms was cancelled due to the cancellation of the summer recreation programs that
387 they served. There was also consideration in view of the current virus situation and the
388 need to minimize shared surfaces as would exist in portable rest rooms .
389
390 Mayor Rafferty said he appreciates the thoughts behind eliminating the restrooms but
391 wonders what all the people who are walking about are using instead of the portables ?
392 Councilmember Ruhland asked if portable restroom providers have any best practices
393 these days and Mr . DeGardner remarked that hand sanitizing stations are available for the
394 inside of the units but there could be an issue getting the sanitizer fluid . Mr . DeGardner
395 noted that some areas are still using the portable units with a disclaimer and he also added
396 that the location of these portables are the community parks , which are closed, and not the
397 trail system which has seen an increase in use . Public Safety Director Swenson added
398 that if portables are to be put out, the city is really obligated to provide what ' s needed to
399 keep them safe, i . e . wipes , sanitizers , etc . Chief Swenson also noted his concern about
400 the message sent, during a stay at home order, that portable bathrooms are being made
401 available .
402 A majority of council members concurred that portable restrooms are not a good idea at
403 this time .
404 12 . Council Updates on Boards/Commissions — Mayor Rafferty briefly recalled a
405 recent VLAMO meeting and the addition of their new top notch director.
406 Councilmember Cavegn noted his first Joint Law Enforcement group meeting and that he
407 will be getting some background to assist him as he moves forward with that group .
408 13 . Review Regular Agenda
409 The agenda was briefly reviewed . There were no changes .
410 The meeting was adjourned at 11 : 00 p . m .
411
412 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
413 May 25 , 2020 .
414
415
10
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APPROVED
416
417 C
418 Ju lande Bartell , Ci Cler Rob Rafferty , Mayor
419
11