Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/12/2023 P & Z Combined Packet CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, July 12, 2023 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 14, 2023 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for Watermark PUD Amendment #4- PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan B. 440 Park Court-Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Update 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike – The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more – groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing – Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on June 14, 2023. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Vojtech moved to approve the May 10, 2023 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 7 – 0. 5. OPEN MIKE Mr. Root declared open mike at 6:32 p.m. There were no public comments. Mr. Vojtech moved to close open mike at 6:33 p.m. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 7 – 0. DATE: June 14, 2023 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 6:57 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Root, Perry Laden, Neil Evenson, SaraJo Stewart, Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech, Patrick Kohler MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Diane Hankee, Julie Whitney Planning & Zoning Board June 14, 2023 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Bluebill Ponds Second Addition Final Plat Mr. Grochala presented the staff report. The applicants, Steve and Rye Gustad, represent House of Praise, Inc. They are final platting a one (1) acre outlot into a lot for the purpose of constructing one (1) single family house. The name of the final plat is Bluebill Ponds Second Addition. The Board had no questions for staff. The applicant was present and had no comment. Mr. Kohler moved to approve the final plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 7 – 0. B. Watermark 6th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat Watermark is a 372 acre master planned residential community consisting of 692 single family lots and 172 townhome units totaling 864 housing units. U.S. Home, LLC (aka Lennar) submitted a Land Use Application for Watermark 6th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat. The plat proposes 48 single family lots and 2 outlots. Mr. Evenson inquired at what point the home buyer would be informed of the limited ability to build accessory structures on lots 2-8 block one (1). Mr. Grochala said the real estate agent and Lennar should be disclosing this at the time of closing but an additional declaration in the title work was added to keep the potential homebuyer informed. This limitation is due to the 40 ft utility easement at the back of the property. Mr. Grochala emphasized they are not prohibited from having an accessory structure, just limited where they can put it. Mr. Evenson asked if the area could be mowed by the homeowner. Mr. Grochala said they could. The only caveat is the homeowner cannot put any structure in that area. Mr. Vojtech asked if the clubhouse was located in this area. Mr. Grochala said it was not. Mr. Vojtech asked if the clubhouse would be finished or at least started before this phase would begin. Mr. Grochala stated it should be finished concurrently with this phase of the development. Mr. Vojtech asked about the open space and if the City has input on what that is supposed to look like. Mr. Grochala said there is a wetland and some buffer areas. Mr. Kohler asked if the future traffic noise in the Anoka County report has been addressed by the City. Mr. Grochala said it is Anoka County’s standard language for development along country roads. Mr. Grochala said they have addressed it by an Planning & Zoning Board June 14, 2023 Page 3 DRAFT MINUTES increased setback from the highway. He also added that the houses in that area are constructed with a higher level of noise abatement. Other than the landscaping and screening and adjusting the distance, no other steps have been taken. Mr. Root wanted to know if the required open space was adjusted with the agreement. Mr. Grochala stated that a blanket easement was provided with the original plat and the legal is redefined at the time of the final plat. Mr. Evenson moved to approve the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 7 – 0. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Staff provided an update on projects. Mr. Vojtech moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Julie Whitney – Community Development Administrative Assistant 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: July 12, 2023 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Watermark PUD Amendment #4- PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan CASE NUMBER: PD2023-001 PP2023-002 APPLICANT: U.S. Home, LLC Attn: Josh Metzer 16305 36th Avenue N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: June 21, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline: August 20, 2023 120-Day Review Deadline: October 19, 2023 Environmental Board Meeting: June 28, 2023 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: July 12, 2023 Tentative City Council Work Session: August 7, 2023 Tentative City Council Meeting: August 14, 2023 BACKGROUND The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for Watermark PUD Amendment #4 - PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan hereafter referred to as PUD Amendment #4. They are proposing an amendment to the north end of Watermark residential development in regards to lot sizes and housing products. The total number of housing units remains 864 and does not change. Staff, Boards, and Council provided feedback on three (3) different Concept Plans from October 2022 to April 2023. The following Council approvals related to the PUD Development Stage Plan are still in effect: 2 • June 13, 2016: Resolution No. 16-51 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat • October 9, 2017: Resolution No. 17-95 approving Amendment #1 to Land Use Plan • December 11, 2017: Resolution No. 17-133 approving Amendment #2 to Architectural Design Standards • October 14, 2019: Resolution No. 19-131 approving Amendment #3 to Architectural Design Standards This staff report is based on review the following plan sets and documents: • Land Use Plan revision date June 2, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark Civil Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark PUD Booklet dated June 12, 2023 prepared by Lennar • Stormwater Management Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain ANALYSIS Watermark is a 372 acre master planned residential community consisting of 692 single family lots and 172 townhome units totaling 864 housing units. Lennar is proposing an amendment to the north end of the Watermark PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan to modify lot sizes and housing product types to address demand changes in the housing market. The proposed amendment does not change any architectural requirements or the total number of housing units. Current Land Use Plan dated August 27, 2018 The current Land Use Plan details 55ft, 60ft, 65ft and 75ft lot widths and associated housing products on the north end of the site. • 94 lots @ 65 ft • 67 lots @ 55-60 ft • 1.05 acre private park PUD Amendment Concept Plans The applicant submitted three (3) concept plans that were reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board and City Council from October 2022 to April 2023. At the April 3, 2023 Work Session, the City Council generally supported Concept Plan A dated Feb 10, 2023 with 55, 60 and 65ft wide lots and with the removal of the townhomes. Lot Size Summary The following table is a summary of just the north end of the development and the current land use plan, 3 proposed concept plans and PUD Amendment #4. 3 Current Land Use Plan (August 2018) Original Concept (Sept 2022) Concept A (Feb 2023) Concept B (Feb 2023) PUD Amend #4 (July 2023) Townhomes 0 74 57 68 0 65-foot lots 94 6 6 6 6 60-foot lots 67 37 37 37 63 55-foot lots 26 40 33 92 50-foot lots 0 0 21 17 0 45-foot lots 0 18 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 161 161 161 161 161 Additional Open Space 0 acres 14.7 acres 12.6 acres 14.3 acres 3.8 acres Private Park 1.05 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 1.06 acres Density The following table is a density comparison of the current and proposed PUD Amendment #4 Land Use Plans for the entire development. Current PUD Amend #4 Aug 2018 June 2023 Gross Area (acres) 372.24 372.24 Wetlands & Water Bodies 45.09 45.09 Public Parks & Open Space 66.25 69.27 Arterial ROW 5.46 5.46 Other (Undevelopable) 0.62 0.62 Net Area (acres) 254.82 251.80 # of Housing Units 864 864 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.32 2.32 Net Density (units/acre) 3.39 3.43 The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was in effect at the time of original approval. The Plan guided the area for mixed use and required a density of 3.0 to 4.5 dwelling units per net acre. The current 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the area for Low Density Mixed Residential and requires a density of 3.0 to 4.0 units per net acre. The proposed amendment meets both density requirements. Zoning In June 2016, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 04-16 approving rezoning of the development to PUD, Planned Unit Development. PUD Amendment #4 will utilize the same setbacks as originally approved. 4 Setbacks Front 25 feet Side (garage) 7.5 feet Side (house) 7.5 feet Side (corner lot) 20-25 feet Rear 25 feet Building Design and Architectural Standards There are no changes to architectural standards. Resolution No. 17-133 and No. 19-131 will still be in effect. Subdivision Ordinance The proposed street layouts and widths, stormwater management facilities, drainage & utility easements, watermain, and sanitary sewer design meet subdivision ordinance requirements. Street right-of-way width is 60ft and the paved street is 30ft back to back. The proposed cul de sacs are less than 500ft in length. Sidewalks are incorporated in the plans. Resolution No. 17-133 details that the minimum lot size for single family lots shall be the Lot Width x 130ft. The proposed amended lots meet or exceed these requirements. The outlots are for wetlands, open space, trail corridors and private park. Parks and Trails The original Land Use Plan proposed a 1.05 acre Private Park in the northeast neighborhood. The amended plan proposes a 1.06 Private Park at the south end of the cul de sac adjacent to the public open space and tying into the trail system. This park is intended for passive recreation and will not have playground amenities. The park will also be owned and maintained by the HOA. Land dedication for the private park and trail construction costs will be credited from the total payment in lieu of land dedication. Comprehensive Plan Lennar’s proposed PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with the approved PUD Development Stage Plan and Comprehensive Plan in regards to resource management system plan, housing plan, economic development, transportation plan and utility plans. Wetlands There are no changes to the wetland mitigation plan. Open Space Easements will be obtained over wetlands and open space areas. Open Space/Wetland Buffer signs shall be installed per Sheet L12. 5 Floodplain There are no changes to the FEMA floodplain. PUD Final Stage Plan/Final Plat Land use applications for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat shall be required. Findings of Fact Preliminary Plat The Planning & Zoning Board shall evaluate the requested preliminary plat against the premature subdivision ordinance. Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation, utilities, local water management, capital improvements and growth management. The development is consistent with residential land use and density requirements. Safe transportation corridors and public utilities also serve the development. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the 2040 Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual. 6 The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 will not negatively impact the transportation system. Level of Service (LOS) requirement is met. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 has an adequate water supply. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 has an adequate waste disposal system. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Watermark PUD Amendment #4 to the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan and subject to the following conditions: The following Council approvals are still in effect: • June 13, 2016: Resolution No. 16-51 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat • October 9, 2017: Resolution No. 17-95 approving Amendment #1 to Land Use Plan • December 11, 2017: Resolution No. 17-133 approving Amendment #2 to Architectural Design Standards • October 14, 2019: Resolution No. 19-131 approving Amendment #3 to Architectural Design Standards The following items shall be addressed prior to Council approval: 1. The Watermark Master Development Agreement shall be amended accordingly. 2. The PUD Master Plan Booklet dated August 31, 2018 shall be amended accordingly. 3. Land Use Plan a. The Site Data-Park Area calculations shall be reviewed and revised accordingly. b. A sketch of the proposed amended area (similar to the concept plan) shall be submitted. 4. Comments from the City Engineer Memo dated July 5, 2023 shall be addressed. 5. Comments from the Environmental Coordinator Memo dated June 28, 2023 shall be addressed. ATTACHMENTS 7 1.Current Land Use Plan dated August 27, 2018 2. Concept Plan A dated February 10, 2023 3.Amended Land Use Plan revision date June 2, 2023 4.Current Preliminary Plat Plan Sheets 16-18 dated August 27, 2018 5.Amended Preliminary Plat Plan Sheets 16-18 dated June 12, 2023 6. City Engineer Memo dated July 5, 2023 7. Environment Coordinator Memo dated June 28, 2023 >20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35E73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN WATERMARKLAND USE PLANf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\6731_sba land use plan revd4.dwgSave Date:08/29/18Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.1of1WATERMARKLino Lakes, MinnesotaI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:25063Drawn:Designed:Date:06/19/17BJKC#Revisions:1. 06/22/17 Revise Legend.2. 07/10/17 Revise layout.3. 04/30/18 Revise layout.4. 06/01/18 Revise layout.5. 08/27/18 Per City comments.environmentalengineeringsurveying···Cente rv i l leLake Pel t ie rLakeRice C reekChain o f lakesReserveLakeReshanau Ci ty o f Cente rv i l le RondeauLake LOCATION MAP 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comLENNAR16305 - 36TH Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, Minnesota 55446 LEGEND 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN SITE DATA SOIL BORINGS WETLANDS OWNER CONTACT Attachment 1: Current Land Use Plan dated August 27, 2018 W A T E R M A R K 2023 CONCEPT PLAN A LAND USE PLAN f:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\ne revision exhibits\6731_exhibit 3 - 2023 concept plan a.dwgSave Date:02/07/23 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.1 of 1 WATERMARK Lino Lakes, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:25063 Drawn: Designed: Date:02/10/23 BJK C# environmental engineering surveying · · · 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax: (763) 489-7959 www.carlsonmccain.com LENNAR 16305 - 36TH Avenue N. Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnesota 55446 Revisions: LEGEND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35E20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)ST. REHBEIN TOT LOT TO B E C O N V E R T E D TO O P E N S P A C E TO BE CONVERTED TO OPEN SPACE Attachment 2: Concept Plan A dated February 10, 2023 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35E73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN WATERMARKLAND USE PLANf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\6731_sba land use plan revd5.dwgSave Date:06/02/23Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.1of1WATERMARKLino Lakes, MinnesotaI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:25063Drawn:Designed:Date:06/19/17BJKC#Revisions:1. 06/22/17 Revise Legend.2. 07/10/17 Revise layout.3. 04/30/18 Revise layout.4. 06/01/18 Revise layout.5. 08/27/18 Per City comments.environmentalengineeringsurveying···Cente rv i l leLake Pel t ie rLakeRice C reekChain o f lakesReserveLakeReshanau Ci ty o f Cente rv i l le RondeauLake LOCATION MAP 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comLENNAR16305 - 36TH Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, Minnesota 55446 LEGEND 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN SITE DATA SOIL BORINGS WETLANDS OWNER CONTACT 6. 08/16/2022 Revise layout.7. 09/09/2022 Revise SITE DATA.8. 11/29/2022 Revise layout.9. 05/15/2023 Revise layout.10. 05/23/2023 Revise layout.11. 06/02/2023 Revise layout.Attachment 3: Amended Land Use Plan revision date June 2, 2023 20TH AVENUE NORTH (C.S.A.H. NO. 54) NORWAY LANERAINY LANEOSAKIS STREETVICTORIA CIRCLE SEE SHEET 15 OF 45 SHEETS SEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:08/27/18Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4516LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 21.08/07/18 City Comments.08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Attachment 4: Current Preliminary Plat Plan Sheets 16-18 dated August 27, 2018 SWAN STREETRAINY LANETRAVERSE DRIVELOTUS LANE PEPIN DRIVESEE SHEET 16 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 18 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 14 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:08/27/18Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4517LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 21.08/07/18 City Comments.08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments. SWAN STREETTRAVERSE DRIVE TRAVERSE DRIVE PEPIN DRIVESWAN STREET PEPIN DRIVE SEE SHEET 13 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:08/27/18Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4518LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:08/07/18 City Comments.08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments. 20TH AVENUE NORTH (C.S.A.H. NO. 54) NORWAY LANERAINY LANEOSAKIS STREETVICTORIA CIRCLE SEE SHEET 15 OF 45 SHEETS SEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4516LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revisionAttachment 5: Amended Preliminary Plat Plan Sheets 16-18 SWAN STREETRAINY LANETRAVERSE DRIVELOTUS LANE PEPIN DRIVESEE SHEET 16 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 18 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 14 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4517LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revision SWAN STREETTRAVERSE DRIVE TRAVERSE DRIVE PEPIN DRIVE SEE SHEET 13 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4518LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revision 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: July 5, 2023 Re: Watermark PUD Amendment #4 Preliminary Plat Review 023188-000 WSB reviewed the PUD Amendment #4 for the Watermark Development in Lino Lakes, MN, received June 15, 2023. Following submittals were reviewed. •Watermark Civil Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain •Stormwater Management Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain Engineering •Erosion Control & Grading The Watermark PUD Amendment #4 includes the revised site grading for the proposed streets, homes, and storm water facilities. •Stormwater Management Due to the conversion of residential and street land cover to proposed open space, no adverse impacts to stormwater management facilities are expected as a result of this amended PUD. Comments: 1.Applicant to provide a comparison table of basin HWLs and site outflow rates based on the amended PUD to determine any potential freeboard or rate control changes. •Water Supply The Watermark PUD proposes 16” water main along Lotus Lane, 12” water main along Rainy Lane, and 8” water main on the other streets within the northeast area. PUD Amendment #4 does not propose any changes to the water main at this time other than removing the looped connection between Pepin Drive and Swan Street as they are now two separate cul de sacs. The proposed 8” watermain will be sufficient to serve the proposed homes in PUD Amendment #4. •Sanitary Sewer Attachment 6: Engineering Review Memo - PUD Amendment 4 Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 2 Watermark PUD #4 Engineering Review The Watermark PUD proposes 10” sanitary sewer along Lotus Lane and 8” sanitary sewer on the other streets within the northeast area. PUD Amendment #4 does not propose any changes to the sanitary sewer at this time. The proposed 8” sanitary sewer will be sufficient to serve the proposed homes in PUD Amendment #4. •Transportation The applicant is proposing to eliminate a couple segments of Pepin Drive including the looping intersection with Swan Street which will reduce each street to cul de sacs that meet the City’s maximum 500’ length requirement. Typically, having through roads will allow for better access and ease of maintenance than cul de sacs. The remaining lengths and widths of the city streets have not changed with PUD Amendment #4. •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Wetlands were delineated for the Watermark PUD development. PUD Amendment #4 does not impact the existing wetlands in this area as the street layout near the existing wetlands in not proposed to change. •Landscaping Landscaping to be reviewed with future submittals and shall meet City zoning requirements. Landscaping will be reviewed in depth by the City’s Environmental Coordinator. •Floodplain There is no floodplain on this portion of the plat. Floodplain mitigation for previous development phases has been completed. •Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements are provided over surface water management features as required. Comments: 1.Applicant to provide confirmation that RCWD will allow storm sewer pipe within their draintile easement along the northern development line. 2.The applicant shall submit storm sewer depths. Additional easement width will be required where the pipe is deeper. 3.We recommend a deed restriction on the RCWD/Anoka County ditch easement. 4.Easements will be required over open space, stormwater management area and wetland area (Outlot E). •Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with any final plats of future additions. Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 3 Watermark PUD #4 Engineering Review •Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Stormwater Maintenance Agreements will be required with any final plats of future additions. Public facilities will be covered by the City’s Programmatic Maintenance Agreement. Rear yard sump connections are to be privately maintained. •Permits Required Permit requirements will be reviewed with the Final Plat. Comments: 1.Applicant will be required to amend their RCWD permit for Rule C. If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: June 28th, 2023 Re: Environmental Comments/Watermark PUD Amendment #4 Preliminary Plat 1. All trees added to Outlot E should be changed to fire-tolerant species to allow for future management of native plant areas with fire. Plants within the HOA park area can remain as is because the area will be sodded. 2. For all trees to be preserved, tree protection fence should be installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence detail. This pertains to the line of trees on the east perimeter heading from the northeast corner of the site to the southern tip of Pond 1100. 3. Tree protection fence should be shown on the Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (sheets 35 and 42) and future grading plans. 4. Silt fence is shown for perimeter control along the east perimeter. Biologs should be used for perimeter control along the east tree line heading from the northeast corner of the site south to a point even with the southern tip of Pond 1100. This will minimize impact to the tree roots. 5.Native seeded areas must meet City Native Plant Establishment Requirements. This should be noted in the Site Landscape Plan Details (Sheet L6). 6. Three crabapples in the right of way in front of Block 28, lots 3 and 4, should be switched to a single boulevard tree. 7. Protected Open Space Area monument signs should be added to the corners of the private park. Environmental Memo Attachment 7: Environmental Comments PUD Amend #4 PP 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: July 12, 2023 REQUEST: 440 Park Court-Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review CASE NUMBER: CR2023-001 APPLICANT: Lariat Companies Inc. 8345 Crystal View Rd. #200 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 OWNER: Same REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: June 22, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline: August 21, 2023 120-Day Review Deadline: October 20, 2023 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: July 12, 2023 Tentative City Council Work Session: August 7, 2023 Tentative City Council Meeting: N/A BACKGROUND The applicant, Lariat Companies Inc. submitted a Land Use Application for a Concept Plan for a proposed multi-tenant industrial and indoor self-storage building at 440 Park Court. The applicant proposes to construct a 36,000sf building on the south end of the site. The north end of the site is the existing Lino Lakes Storage. Future Land Use Applications may include: • Conditional Use Permit for two (2) or more principal buildings • Site and Building Plan Review This staff report is based on the followings plan sets: 2 • ALTA Survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated June 8, 2023 • Site Plan prepared by Amcon dated June 6, 2023 • Floor Plan and Building Elevations prepared by Amcon dated June 6, 2023 • Applicant Narrative prepared by Bruce Hellier dated June 13, 2023 • Trip General Statement prepared by Traffic Impact Group, LLC dated June 13, 2023 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC dated May 11, 2023 ANALYSIS History On September 10, 2018, the City Council passed Resolution No. 18-103 approving a conditional use permit for the mini self-storage facility located on the Phase I, the north half of the 440 Park Court site. Phase II, the south half of the site, was intended for additional mini self-storage facilities; however, in January 2023, the new zoning ordinance was adopted and mini self-storage facilities are no longer allowed in the LI, Light Industrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct an industrial building with eleven (11) multi- tenant industrial units to be used by construction related businesses (Building 1) and indoor self-storage (Building 2). See the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed project description. Zoning and Land Use The subject site is zoned LI, Light Industrial. Construction related business and indoor self-storage are permitted uses; however, a conditional use permit would be needed to allow for two (2) or more principal buildings on site (existing mini-storage facilities and industrial building/storage). Staff Comments: 1. Staff recommends only permitted uses listed in the LI, Light Industrial zoning district be allowed to operate in the multi-tenant industrial building units. Conditional uses would not be allowed. a. For example, auto repair or restoration would not be allowed. 2. Indoor self-storage or storage of personal items in the multi-tenant industrial building units/bays would not be allowed. a. The intent of the units is to provide a location for smaller industrial users to operate. b. Per City Code Section 1007.001 Definitions, outdoor access to individual units is prohibited for indoor self-storage. 3 SELF-STORAGE, INDOOR. A fully enclosed, climate-controlled building that contains separate, individual and private storage spaces of varying sizes, leased or rented on an individual basis for the storage of personal property. Individual renters’ control and access individual storage spaces and each unit must be directly accessed from the interior of the building via its own access door. Outdoor access to individual units is prohibited. Ancillary retail sales of related items, such as moving supplies, and facility offices may also be included. Such facilities to be used for storage only. Site and Building Plan Review The total site is 5.74 acres. The Phase II area is approximately 2.5 acres. Per the site plan, Building 1 has eight (8) 25’ x 60’(1,500sf) industrial units along the north side of the building. On the east side, there are three (3) 25’ x 40’ (1,000sf) industrial units. Building 2 is a 120’ x 160’ (19,200sf) indoor self-storage area. There is one (1) mechanical room. The total building is 36,000sf. The site plan shows 18 parking stalls. The existing stormwater pond is proposed to be expanded. Total site impervious coverage is 56% which is less than the maximum 75% allowed. Access to Phase 2 is proposed through the Phase I mini self-storage private driveways. No additional access onto CSAH 23(Lake Drive) is allowed. An 8ft privacy fence and landscaping is shown along the east lot line. Staff Comments: 1. The site and building plan shall meet the performance standards of the City zoning ordinance. 2. The front lot line is along Park Court; therefore, the rear lot line is along the south lot line and the side lot line is along the west lot line. The site plan shall be revised. 3. Per the June 23, 2023 Lino Lakes Public Safety Memo, Deputy Director Dan L’Allier has concerns about movability of fire apparatus to the access the buildings. A turning radius study is required using Lino Lakes apparatus templates. 4. How do emergency vehicles access the industrial building? 5. How does the general public and employees access the industrial building through the locked gate of the mini self-storage? 6. Parking spaces were calculated as warehousing at 1 space for each 2,000sf of gross floor area. 36,000sf gross floor area/2,000sf = 18 spaces. a. City ordinance requires 2 spaces for each employee for Contractor’s Offices and 1 space for each 500 sf of gross floor area for Light Manufacturing. b. Per the applicant’s narrative, a variety of industrial uses are proposed on site other than just warehousing. c. Parking space requirements shall be re-evaluated. 7. Wetlands exist along the west lot line and appear to be impacted by the proposed expanded stormwater pond. 8. More information is needed on the intended use and build out of Building 2. 4 9. The site plan shall accurately depict the actual construction of the mini self- storage facility. 10. To avoid future confusion, if the project moves forward, the project name should be changed from Tech Center since this isn’t a technology center proposal. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials Per the applicant’s narrative, the proposed exterior materials consist of rock faced block, glass, hollow metal doors, and prefinished overhead doors. Three (3) colors are shown on the elevations (red, tan and gray). Each unit has a window. The proposed building height is 18’ 2” to the top of the wall. The proposed height is less than the maximum allowed 45ft. Staff Comments 1. The building shall meet the minimum 75% exterior materials of at least two different class 1 or class 2 materials. a. To be counted as a primary material, the product must comprise at least 5% of the wall surface. b. Actual material percentages shall be provided to confirm to the proposed class 1 glass material and class 2 rock faced block material). 2. Restroom facilities are required based on the tenant user examples. Other City Ordinance and Site Performance Standards Other applicable City ordinances include but are not limited to: • Parking • Grading Plan and Stormwater Management • Public Utilities o Municipal water and sanitary sewer shall be extended to the building. • Landscaping and Tree Preservation • Signage Wetlands Per the Wetland Delineation Report dated May 11, 2023, there are 2 wetland basins on site totaling 0.53 acres. A WCA Notice of Decision approving the delineation is required. An approved wetland mitigation plan is required if the wetlands will be impacted. Staff Comments: 1. Staff does not support wetland impacts for stormwater management. Floodplain 5 The site is not within a floodplain. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement may be required. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required. Concept Plan The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the following input from the Planning & Zoning Board: 1. Does the Board support the proposed multi-tenant industrial and indoor self- storage building? 2. If yes, does the Board have additional site and building review comments? ATTACHMENTS 1.Applicant Narrative 2. Concept Plan, Building Floor Plan & Elevations and ALTA Survey 3.Lino Lakes Fire Division Memo dated June 23, 2023 4. City Engineer Memo dated July 5, 2023 5. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated July 5, 2023 06.13.2023 Katie Larson ACIP City Planner 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Lino Lakes Tech Center New Building Narrative Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Katie, Below is a brief narrative of the proposed building design, image, and material section for the proposed new Lino Lakes Tech Center located at 440 Park Court. The attached application and associated materials are for the Concept Plan Review. The information is based on the enclosed site plans, floor plans, renderings, and elevations. BACKGROUND FOR LINO LAKES PROJECT Lariat Companies, Inc. was formed in 1989 by owner and founder, Ed Flaherty. He has a significant business background that includes starting four companies that grew to over $100M in sales. Applebee’s and Rapid Oil Change are companies that Ed started which you would recognize. As part of his investment strategy, he started Lariat as a family office and real estate company. In 1990 he purchased 40+ acres around the Eden Prairie Center. He built that out over a period of 10 years (all speculative buildings) and owns and manages seven buildings today on that land, Lariat has been a long-term owner of real estate and has mostly done speculative development as an owner and rehab/turnaround of troubled real estate. Currently, lariat owns and manages approximately 1M square feet of retail, industrial, commercial office-warehouse, and self- storage. All this real estate is in Minnesota. As a small business owner, Ed has seen the need for commercial small tenant space and is now creating a number of projects addressing this need. Most office/warehouse for lease space starts at 5,000 square feet and increases from there. That size space is too large for emerging business. Current Lariat projects include buildings in Waconia, Coon Rapids and in Chaska. There are three buildings in Waconia; one building is 12,000 square feet, one building is 9,000 square feet and a third building is 8,000 square feet. There are also two buildings in Bloomington near the Mall of America. The tenant mix in Waconia includes the following uses: plumbing contractor, manufacturer’s rep/showroom, auto restoration, environmental company, flooring distribution and installation, small parts manufacturer, on-line retailer (e-trailer), dry wall contractor, aviation equipment, repair and sales and disaster repair contractor. All of these tenants, but one, came out of operating in their home and/or self-storage spaces. We also have two buildings in Bloomington which have larger bays (2,200 – 2,800 square feet). The tenant mix in these two buildings include granite showroom and fabricator, internet contractor, kitchen cabinet showroom and distributor, apparel goods wholesaler and retailer, printer, small parts manufacturer, CPA, Hispanic spice distributor, T-Shirt screen printer, overhead garage door company, photographer, industrial tool repair and distributor, HVAC contractor, audio visual contractor and distributor, and orthopedic appliance fabricator and repair. Most of these businesses in Bloomington were mature enough they just needed larger space. Lariat has developed management systems that allow us to manage these small users efficiently and effectively. Attachment 1: Applicant Narrative With the “GIG” economy claiming 25% of Americans have a side business or “GIG” and the younger generation expecting to have up to a dozen jobs in a lifetime, the days of a person working for one larger company is less likely. The younger generation have unfavorable attitudes towards large companies and hence some of the impetus to the “GIG”. LINO LAKES CORE VALUES Minimize Light Pollution The nature of the project is small in height, therefore the amount of light emitted will be close to the ground with the minimum of site lighting, the amount of light spillage will be minimal. Welcoming Building This project is accessed on one level and that is the street level only, there are 11 entry doors, one for each suite. Zoning The current zoning is L1 and will not be changed. Sustainable Initiatives The building will be in full compliance with the Minnesota Energy Code requirements. Metering Each suite will have a separate gas, water, and electric meter. TRAFFIC Please see the traffic study. SIGNAGE See existing site signage. MATERIALS Building Façade -Rock faced block, glass, hollow metal doors, Prefinished overhead doors. Roof -Rubber membrane Roof Structure -Wood trusses Floor Structure -Slab on Grade Windows -Vinyl double hung Man Doors -Hollow Metal Overhead Doors -Aluminum prefinished Please contact me if you have any questions or need any clarifications or additional information. Sincerely Bruce Hellier Amcon Construction CONCEPT SITE PLAN 1"=50'36,000 BUILDING S.F.24,256 s.f.PHASE ONEEXISTING BLDGSPHASE TWO10' SIDE YARD SET BACK50' F R O N T Y A R D S E T B A C K NE W 5 0 ' B E R M T O M A T C H E X I S T I N G PR O P E R T Y L I N EPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPARK COURTLA K E D R I V E RELOCATEHYDRANT8' W O O D P R I V A C Y F E N C E 249,763 TOTAL S.F. LOTPHASE ONE 91,461 S.F.= 36% SURFACE COVERAGEPHASE TWO 49,443 S.F.= 20% SURFACE COVERAGETOTAL COVERAGE = 140,904 = 56%75% ALLOWED18 PARKING STALLS SHOWN18 REQUIREDEXISTINGON SITEPONDINGBLDG 2 120'X160'12,000 sf TOTAL15' REAR YARD SET BACK 1018 PARKINGSTALLSPHASE TWO NEW BUILDINGS PHASE ONE EXIST. BUILDINGSBLDG 1 8-25'X60' BAYS 1,500 sf EACH3 25x40 BAYS1,000 SF EACH3,000 sf TOTALMECH RMEXPANDEDPONDING18'4'9'182 3 4 5 6 722'-10"73,042 s.f.woodlandarea49,443 s.f.91,461 s.f.CONCEPT PLANSITE PHOTOSBUILDING ELEVATIONSBUILDING FLOOR PLANSHEET INDEXAERIAL MAP 1"=100'PROJECTLOCATIONPHASE 2SCHWANSASMODEENEW IMAGECOATINGRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYKLMBTRANSPORTATIONBLUE HERONELEMENTARYSCHOOL440 PARK COURTSTORAGEASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESLOWSCRUBBRUSHPONDLOWSCRUBBRUSHZONEDL IPROJECT NAME: 440 PARKS STORAGE PHASE 2SITE ADDRESS: 440 PARK COURTLINO LAKES, MN 55014TOTAL PARCEL: 5.73 ACZONING: L-I LIGHT INDUSTRIALTAX PARCEL #: 17-31-22-32-0019INTENDED USE: LIGHT INDUST. STORAGEEXISTING USE: VACANT LOT, GRASS COVEREDSETBACKSREQUIREDFRONT50'SIDE10'REAR15'PARKING 1 SPACE PER 2,000 SF18 REQ. 18 PROVIDEDBUILDING CONTRACTORAMCON CONSTRUCTION6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE #101MINNETONKA, MN 55345CONTACT: WAYDE JOHNSONPHONE: 651-379-9016WJOHNSON@AMCONCONSTRUCTION.COMOWNER APPLICANTLARIAT COMPANIES INC.8345 CRYSTAL VIEW RD STE 200EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344ARCHITECTAMCON CONSTRUCTION6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE #101MINNETONKA, MN 55345SURVEYORE.G. RUD & SONS INC.6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONTACT: JASON RUDPHONE: 651-361-8200WWW.EGRUD.COMSEE THE PHASE ONE SITE STUDY FOR THE HISTORY OF THE SITE, ANDANY HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT FEATURES.SEE THE WETLANDS STUDY FOR ALL DELINEATED WETLAND ON SITE.ZONING MAPLINO LAKES TECH CENTER440 PARK COURT LINO LAKES MN 55014© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23C.P.Attachment 2: Concept Plan, Building Floor Plan & Elevations and ALTA Survey PROJECTLOCATIONPHASE 2SCHWANSRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYTRANSPORTATIONBLUE HERONELEMENTARYSCHOOL440 PARK COURTSTORAGEASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESLOWSCRUBBRUSHPONDLOWSCRUBBRUSHSITE IMAGES NO SCALESITE PHOTOS© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23 118'-11 1/2"40'-0"59'-4 1/2"24'-3 1/4"19'-4"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-2"200'-2"0'-7 1/2"0'-5"0'-5"0'-5"0'-5"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"0'-10 1/4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"FLOOR PLAN1A101SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0" 0'-8" 3'-4" 2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 25'-0"24'-0"24'-0 1/2" 0'-6"0'-6"180'-0"0'-7 1/2" 24'-6 3/4" 60'-2 1/2"158'-3 1/2"A101© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23 EAST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23ELEV. ONE VISION. ONE MISSION. LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT. Lino Lakes Public Safety Department Memo , DATE: June 23, 2023 TO: Katie Larsen, City Planner CC: John Swenson, Public Safety Director FROM: Dan LAllier, Deputy Director RE: 440 Park Court Project Proposal After reviewing the conceptual plan for 440 Park Court, I have serious concerns about the movability for fire apparatus to access the buildings indicated in the project proposal. My recommendation would be to complete a turning study, using our apparatus. I will include the wheelbase of our apparatus with this memo. Attachment 3: Lino Lakes Fire Division Memo dated June 23, 2023 APPARATUS MODEL CONSTRUCTION:PUMP MAKE/MODEL/CAP.:TANK CAP.: DRAWN BY: REV. STAGE/DATE Osceola, WI 54020 -- (715) 294-2555 NOTE: Detailed specifications for this apparatus supersede this presentation drawing. Items shown on this drawing but not detailed within the specifications maybe optional add-on features. This drawing is proprietary and confidential. SPARTAN GLADIATOR LFD 24" RR TME TANDEM 450.5"BOLTED STAINLESS STEEL BODY 2000GPM WATEROUS CSU + CPK 300GPM PTO 2200 WMK PRE-CONTRACTSALES REP: WMK PROJECT ENGR: TBD REV. STAGE/DATE FINAL PROPOSAL REV. STAGE/DATE POST PREBUILD REV. STAGE/DATE ENGINEERING CUSTOMER TITLE/LEAD: DAN L'ALLIER7.26.22 NA NA NA FIRE CHIEF FINAL DESIGN CUSTOMER SIGN OFF date: OAL:WB:OAH: 223"132" Reference Scale (inches) 120 3624 Each increment eTuals one inch at full scale. 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" 2.5" Reference Scale (inches) 120 3624 Each increment eTuals one inch at full scale. pack floor dry 2 ext with fuel fill cabinet cabinet cabinet cabinet suctiondischarge 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 1.75" 3 bottlefloor dry3 bottle STIHL TS 420 STIHL STIHL MS 361 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: July 5, 2023 Re: Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review 023187-000 WSB reviewed the concept plans for the Lino Lakes Tech Center site in Lino Lakes, MN, received June 22, 2023. The site is 2.34 acres and located at 440 Park Court west of Lake Drive (CSAH 23). The lot has frontage along Lake Drive (CSAH 23). Comments were made on the following documents: •Lino Lakes Tech Center plans prepared by Amcon, dated June 6, 2023, received June 22, 2023. •Geotechnical Report prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering, Inc., dated October 4, 2017, received April 10, 2023. •Trip Generation Statement, dated June 13, 2023. •Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, dated May 11, 2023. •Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared American Engineering and Testing, Inc. dated January 8, 2018 The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering •Grading The plans at this time do not include a specific site grading plan for the proposed parking lot, storm water basins, and tech center. The area proposed for the Lino Lakes Tech Center has previously been identified to contain construction debris materials buried underneath the existing site. A Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP) have been drafted to include that grading of the site proposes capping or necessary removal of the debris as part of the site preparation. An expansion is proposed on the west side of the existing pond to provide treatment and storage for the site. This expansion will need to remain outside the delineated wetland. Comments: 1. Provide a grading plan meeting City requirements. 2.The applicant shall note that site grading work shall be done in accordance with the approved MPCA Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP). Provide updated documentation regarding the current state of the RAP. Attachment 4: City Engineer Memo dated July 5, 2023 Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 2 Lino Lake Tech Center Engineering Review •Stormwater Management The stormwater management for Lino Lakes Tech Center consists of a pond expansion on the west side of the parcel. Comments: 1.The applicant shall provide an updated Stormwater Management Report demonstrating the appropriate sizing and treatment for the expansion. •Water Supply Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. The applicant will be required to extend water from the adjacent site. Comments: 1.Applicant to provide a utility plan for the site meeting City requirements. 2.We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the proposed plan when submitted •Sanitary Sewer Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. Sanitary sewer maybe required depending on use. •Transportation Lino Lakes Tech Center proposes connecting to the existing storage site to the north for access off of Park Court with paved private access to each of the units throughout the site. The 2003 EAW analyzed this parcel as a light industrial user with two (2) professional office buildings totally 28,800 sf. The existing mini self-storage facility together with the Tech Center will produce less traffic than two professional office buildings and therefore, is consistent with the EAW findings. No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated and a traffic study is not required. There should be no site access off o Lake Drive per Anoka County Access Policy. Comments: 1.Vehicle access through the existing storage facility is a concern. We recommend additional evaluation. 2.The applicant shall provide a pavement removal/replacement and site plans 3.The applicant shall note if curb & gutter will be used •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Wetlands are shown on the existing survey for the site. Comments: 1.The existing wetland is not in the Wetland Mapping Corridor (WMC) a.Show and call out the required minimum 10' wetland buffer size. •Landscaping Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 3 Lino Lake Tech Center Engineering Review Landscaping plans were not provided as part of the submittal. The City’s Environmental Coordinator to review landscaping and provide in-depth comments when provided •Floodplain No floodplain impacts are proposed on site. •Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are required for stormwater systems. •Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration. •Permits Required 1.NPDES General Construction Permit 2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for construction 3.Rice Creek Watershed Permit 4.Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – approved RAP and CCP 5.Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit if grading work extends into their right of way. If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: July 5th, 2023 Re: Environmental Staff Comments/July 5th, 2023/440 Park Court RECOMMENDATIONS 1.A landscaping plan must be submitted that complies with city landscaping requirements which are detailed on pgs. 102-117 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2.There is a Natural Resources Conservation Area on the west portion of the site. Any trees removed from this area will have higher mitigation planting requirements. Preserving as many of the trees in this area would be preferable. Trees preserved must be protected with Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with the city detail. 3.Swamp blackberry (Rubus semisitosus), a threatened plant in Minnesota, has been found on or near the proposed project site. A rare species survey must be completed for the site. A permit from the Minnesota DNR may be required for any impacts to this species. 4.Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii), a threatened species in Minnesota, has been found within a mile of the project site. MN DNR flyer and factsheet must be provided to all contractors working on the site. Environmental Memo Attachment 5: Environmental Coordinator Memo dated July 5, 2023