Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-07-2023 Council Work Session Packet
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, August 7, 2023 Community Room 6:00 P.M. 1. Watermark PUD Amendment #4-PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, Katie Larsen 2. 440 Park Court-Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan, Katie Larsen 3. Otter Lake Road Extension Plans & Specs, Michael Grochala 4. Apollo Business Park Business Expansion, Michael Grochala 5. Cannabis in Public Spaces, Kyle Leibel 6. Q1 and Q2 Public Safety Update, Kyle Leibel 7. Fire Services Discussion, Councilmember Lyden/Cavegn 8. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council 9. Driveway Access Agreement Insurance Requirements, Michael Grochala 10. Carole Estates 2nd Addition Land Sale (Closed Discussion), Michael Grochala 11. Adjourn WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 1 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen, City Planner Re: Watermark PUD Amendment #4-PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Background At the Work Session, staff will present the August 14, 2023 Council staff report. The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for Watermark PUD Amendment #4 - PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat hereafter referred to as PUD Amendment #4. They are proposing an amendment to the north end of Watermark residential development in regards to lot sizes and housing products. The total number of housing units remains 864 and does not change. Staff, Boards, and Council provided feedback on three (3) different Concept Plans from October 2022 to April 2023. Requested Council Direction None, discussion only. Attachments 1. August 14, 2023 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: August 14, 2023 TOPIC: Watermark PUD Amendment #4-PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat i.Consider Resolution No. 23-77 Approving PUD Amendment#4 to PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat ii.Consider Resolution No. 23-78 Approving First Amendment to Master Development Agreement VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration of the above noted resolutions. Complete Application Date: June 21, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline:August 20, 2023 120-Day Review Deadline:October 19, 2023 City Council Work Session: August 7, 2023 City Council Meeting: August 14, 2023 This Council staff report provides updates to the July 12, 2023 Planning & Zoning staff report. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). BACKGROUND The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for Watermark PUD Amendment #4 - PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat hereafter referred to as PUD Amendment #4. They are proposing an amendment to the north end of Watermark residential development in regards to lot sizes and housing products. The total number of housing units remains 864 and does not change. Staff, Boards, and Council provided feedback on three (3) different Concept Plans from October 2022 to April 2023. Attachment 1: August 14, 2023 Council Staff Report 2 The following Council approvals related to the PUD Development Stage Plan are still in effect: • June 13, 2016: Resolution No. 16-51 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat • October 9, 2017: Resolution No. 17-95 approving Amendment #1 to Land Use Plan • December 11, 2017: Resolution No. 17-133 approving Amendment #2 to Architectural Design Standards • October 14, 2019: Resolution No. 19-131 approving Amendment #3 to Architectural Design Standards This staff report is based on review the following plan sets and documents: • Land Use Plan revision date June 2, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark Civil Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark PUD Booklet dated June 12, 2023 prepared by Lennar • Stormwater Management Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain ANALYSIS Watermark is a 372 acre master planned residential community consisting of 692 single family lots and 172 townhome units totaling 864 housing units. Lennar is proposing an amendment to the north end of the Watermark PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan to modify lot sizes and housing product types to address demand changes in the housing market. The proposed amendment does not change any architectural requirements or the total number of housing units. Current Land Use Plan dated August 27, 2018 The current Land Use Plan details 55ft, 60ft, 65ft and 75ft lot widths and associated housing products on the north end of the site. • 94 lots @ 65 ft • 67 lots @ 55-60 ft • 1.05 acre private park PUD Amendment Concept Plans The applicant submitted three (3) concept plans that were reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board and City Council from October 2022 to April 2023. At the April 3, 2023 Work Session, the City Council generally supported Concept Plan A dated Feb 10, 2023 with 55, 60 and 65ft wide lots and with the removal of the townhomes. Lot Size Summary The following table is a summary of just the north end of the development and the current land use plan, 3 proposed concept plans and PUD Amendment #4. 3 Current Land Use Plan (August 2018) Original Concept (Sept 2022) Concept A (Feb 2023) Concept B (Feb 2023) PUD Amend #4 (July 2023) Townhomes 0 74 57 68 0 65-foot lots 94 6 6 6 6 60-foot lots 67 37 37 37 63 55-foot lots 26 40 33 92 50-foot lots 0 0 21 17 0 45-foot lots 0 18 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 161 161 161 161 161 Additional Open Space 0 acres 14.7 acres 12.6 acres 14.3 acres 3.8 acres Private Park 1.05 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 1.06 acres Density The following table is a density comparison of the current and proposed PUD Amendment #4 Land Use Plans for the entire development. Current PUD Amend #4 Aug 2018 June 2023 Gross Area (acres) 372.24 372.24 Wetlands & Water Bodies 45.09 45.09 Public Parks & Open Space 66.25 69.27 Arterial ROW 5.46 5.46 Other (Undevelopable) 0.62 0.62 Net Area (acres) 254.82 251.80 # of Housing Units 864 864 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.32 2.32 Net Density (units/acre) 3.39 3.43 The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was in effect at the time of original approval. The Plan guided the area for mixed use and required a density of 3.0 to 4.5 dwelling units per net acre. The current 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the area for Low Density Mixed Residential and requires a density of 3.0 to 4.0 units per net acre. The proposed amendment meets both density requirements. Zoning 4 In June 2016, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 04-16 approving rezoning of the development to PUD, Planned Unit Development. PUD Amendment #4 will utilize the same setbacks as originally approved. Setbacks Front 25 feet Side (garage) 7.5 feet Side (house) 7.5 feet Side (corner lot) 20-25 feet Rear 25 feet Building Design and Architectural Standards There are no changes to architectural standards. Resolution No. 17-133 and No. 19-131 will still be in effect. Subdivision Ordinance The proposed street layouts and widths, stormwater management facilities, drainage & utility easements, watermain, and sanitary sewer design meet subdivision ordinance requirements. Street right-of-way width is 60ft and the paved street is 30ft back to back. The proposed cul de sacs are less than 500ft in length. Sidewalks are incorporated in the plans. Resolution No. 17-133 details that the minimum lot size for single family lots shall be the Lot Width x 130ft. The proposed amended lots meet or exceed these requirements. The outlots are for wetlands, open space, trail corridors and private park. Parks and Trails The original Land Use Plan proposed a 1.05 acre Private Park in the northeast neighborhood. The amended plan proposes a 1.06 Private Park at the south end of the cul de sac adjacent to the public open space and tying into the trail system. This park is intended for passive recreation and will not have playground amenities. The park will also be owned and maintained by the HOA. Land dedication for the private park and trail construction costs will be credited from the total payment in lieu of land dedication. Comprehensive Plan Lennar’s proposed PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with the approved PUD Development Stage Plan and Comprehensive Plan in regards to resource management system plan, housing plan, economic development, transportation plan and utility plans. Wetlands 5 There are no changes to the wetland mitigation plan. Open Space Easements will be obtained over wetlands and open space areas. Open Space/Wetland Buffer signs shall be installed per Sheet L12. Floodplain There are no changes to the FEMA floodplain. PUD Final Stage Plan/Final Plat Land use applications for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat shall be required. Findings of Fact The Findings of Fact for Watermark PUD Amendment #4 are detailed in Resolution No. 23-77. RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing regarding Watermark PUD Amendment #4 on July 12, 2023. There were no public comments. The Board recommended approval with a 5-0 vote. ATTACHMENTS 1. Current Land Use Plan 2. Resolution No. 23-77 3. Amended Land Use Plan and Preliminary Plat Plan Sheets 16-18 4. Resolution No. 23-78 5. First Amendment to Master Development Agreement >20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35E73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN WATERMARKLAND USE PLANf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\6731_sba land use plan revd4.dwgSave Date:08/29/18Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.1of1WATERMARKLino Lakes, MinnesotaI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:25063Drawn:Designed:Date:06/19/17BJKC#Revisions:1. 06/22/17 Revise Legend.2. 07/10/17 Revise layout.3. 04/30/18 Revise layout.4. 06/01/18 Revise layout.5. 08/27/18 Per City comments.environmentalengineeringsurveying···Cente rv i l leLake Pel t ie r LakeRice C reekChain o f lakesReserveLakeReshanau Ci ty o f Cente rv i l le RondeauLake LOCATION MAP 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comLENNAR16305 - 36TH Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, Minnesota 55446 LEGEND 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN SITE DATA SOIL BORINGS WETLANDS OWNER CONTACT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 23-77 RESOLUTION APPROVING WATERMARK PUD AMENDMENT #4-PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Watermark PUD Amendment #4-PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat approval hereafter referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the proposed Development based on the following plans and information: • Land Use Plan revision date June 2, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark Civil Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain • Watermark PUD Booklet dated June 12, 2023 prepared by Lennar • Stormwater Management Plan revision date June 12, 2023 prepared by Carlson McCain; and WHEREAS, the City Council the approved the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat with Resolution No. 16-51 on June 13, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the Development on July 12, 2023; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes: FINDINGS OF FACT (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, land use, housing, transportation, 2 utilities, local water management, capital improvements and growth management. The development is consistent with residential land use and density requirements. Safe transportation corridors and public utilities also serve the development. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the 2040 Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 will not negatively impact the transportation system. Level of Service (LOS) requirement is met. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 has an adequate water supply. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems. The proposed Watermark PUD Amendment #4 has an adequate waste disposal system. The number of housing units does not change from the original approved PUD. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the proposed Development is not considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the following Council approvals are still in effect: • June 13, 2016: Resolution No. 16-51 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat • October 9, 2017: Resolution No. 17-95 approving Amendment #1 to Land Use Plan • December 11, 2017: Resolution No. 17-133 approving Amendment #2 to Architectural Design Standards • October 14, 2019: Resolution No. 19-131 approving Amendment #3 to Architectural Design Standards 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of August 2023. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Jolleen Chaika, City Clerk 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35E73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN WATERMARKLAND USE PLANf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\6731_sba land use plan revd5.dwgSave Date:06/02/23Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.1of1WATERMARKLino Lakes, MinnesotaI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:25063Drawn:Designed:Date:06/19/17BJKC#Revisions:1. 06/22/17 Revise Legend.2. 07/10/17 Revise layout.3. 04/30/18 Revise layout.4. 06/01/18 Revise layout.5. 08/27/18 Per City comments.environmentalengineeringsurveying···Cente rv i l le Lake Pel t ie rLakeRi ce C reekChain o f lake sReserveLakeReshanau Ci ty o f Cente rv i l le RondeauLake LOCATION MAP 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comLENNAR16305 - 36TH Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, Minnesota 55446 LEGEND 20TH AVENUE NORTH (CSAH 54)73RD ST. ST.REHBEIN SITE DATA SOIL BORINGS WETLANDS OWNER CONTACT 6. 08/16/2022 Revise layout.7. 09/09/2022 Revise SITE DATA.8. 11/29/2022 Revise layout.9. 05/15/2023 Revise layout.10. 05/23/2023 Revise layout.11. 06/02/2023 Revise layout. 20TH AVENUE NORTH (C.S.A.H. NO. 54) NORWAY LANERAINY LANEOSAKIS STREETVICTORIA CIRCLE SEE SHEET 15 OF 45 SHEETS SEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4516LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revision SWAN STREETRAINY LANETRAVERSE DRIVELOTUS LANE PEPIN DRIVESEE SHEET 16 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 18 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 14 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4517LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revision SWAN STREETTRAVERSE DRIVE TRAVERSE DRIVE PEPIN DRIVE SEE SHEET 13 OF 45 SHEETSSEE SHEET 17 OF 45 SHEETS3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comWATERMARKLino Lakes, Minnesotaf:\jobs\6721 - 6740\6731 - watermark\cad c3d\survey\prel. plat\6731_prp.dwgSave Date:06/12/23Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:environmentalengineeringsurveying···I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPRELIMINARY PLATof4518LENNAR16305 - 36th Avenue N. Suite 600Plymouth, MN 55446Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.40361TRBJAB3/23/183/23/18Revisions:06/01/18 Revise Block 2108/07/18 City Comments08/27/18 Update Street Names per City Comments6/12/23 Update Per NE layout revision CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 23-78 RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO WATERMARK MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 13, 20118 the City Council passed Resolution No. 18-144 approving Watermark Master Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, an amendment has been made to the Master Development Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes approves the First Amendment to Master Development Agreement between U.S. Home, LLC and the City of Lino Lakes and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of August 2023. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Jolleen Chaika, City Clerk FIRST AMENDMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on this ____ day of ________, 2023, by and between the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and U.S. Home, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer“). This Agreement amends the March 7, 2019 Master Development Agreement (the “MDA”) between the parties hereto. WHEREAS, under the MDA the City approved an initial Development Stage Plan for the Development governed by the MDA. WHEREAS, the Development is legally described on the attached Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the City and Developer have agreed via Resolution Numbers 17-95, 17-133, and 19-131 to varied modifications in the Development Stage Plan, which amendments are hereby ratified to be a part of the MDA. WHEREAS, the City and Developer wish to amend the Development Stage Plan again as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City and Developer agree to further amend the Development Stage Plan as follows: Resolution Number 23-77 amending preliminary plat lot sizes and housing products. 2. Except as expressly provided for herein, all other terms of the MDA shall remain in full force and effect. 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES By _________________________ Mayor ATTEST By _________________________ City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2023, by Rob Rafferty as Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City. _______________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________ day of ____________, 2023, by Jolleen Chaika as City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of said City. _______________________________ Notary Public 3 DEVELOPER By ______________________ Jon Aune Its Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF __________ ) On this _______ day of _______________, 2023, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Jon Aune, Vice President of U.S. Home, LLC. (Developer), who executed the foregoing instrument. ______________________________ Notary Public This instrument was drafted by Squires, Waldspurger & Mace 333 South 7th St., Ste 2800 Minneapolis, MN 55402 RASW: 120051 4 Exhibit A Legal Description (To Follow) Watermark PUD Amendment #4 Work Session August 7, 2023 1 Land Use Application•Amendment #4-PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Land Use Plan •Lot Sizes •Housing products •Meet changes in housing market demand •No change in architectural design stands or overall total # housing units (864) •3 different concept plans reviewed from Oct 2022 to April 2023 •This is formal land use application to amend the plan.2 3 Current Land Use Plan Aug 2018 •94 lots @ 65 ft •67 lots @ 55-60 ft •1.05 acre private park 4 PUD Concept Plan A February 10, 2023 •50, 55, 60, and 65ft wide lots and townhomes •Council generally supported Concept Plan A •Omit 50ft wide lots •Omit townhome units •Additional open space •Trail connections 5 PUD Amend #4-Land Use Plan •65ft lots (orange) = 6 •60ft lots (brown) = 63 •55ft lots (tan) = 92 •Additional Open Space = 4 acres •Private Park = 1.06 acres •Passive recreation •HOA owned and maintained •Land dedication and trail construction costs will be credited •Trail corridors •No changes to wetland mitigation plan Summary 6 Current Land Use Plan (August 2018) Original Concept (Sept 2022) Concept A (Feb 2023) Concept B (Feb 2023) PUD Amend #4 (July 2023) Townhomes 0 74 57 68 0 65-foot lots 94 6 6 6 6 60-foot lots 67 37 37 37 63 55-foot lots 26 40 33 92 50-foot lots 0 0 21 17 0 45-foot lots 0 18 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 161 161 161 161 161 Additional Open Space 0 acres 14.7 acres 12.6 acres 14.3 acres 3.8 acres Private Park 1.05 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 1.06 acres 7 PUD Amend #4Current Land Use Plan Density 8 Current PUD Amend #4 Aug 2018 June 2023 Gross Area (acres)372.24 372.24 Wetlands & Water Bodies 45.09 45.09 Public Parks & Open Space 66.25 69.27 Arterial ROW 5.46 5.46 Other (Undevelopable)0.62 0.62 Net Area (acres)254.82 251.80 # of Housing Units 864 864 Gross Density (units/acre)2.32 2.32 Net Density (units/acre)3.39 3.43 •2030 Comprehensive Plan required a density of 3.0 to 4.5 units per net acre. •2040 Comprehensive Plan requires a density of 3.0 to 4.0 units per net acre. •The proposed amendment meets both density requirements. Zoning•PUD, Planned Unit Development per Ordinance No. 04-16 •Resolution No. 17-133 details lot size and architectural standards •Minimize Lot Size = Lot Width x 130ft •Lot Size Range: = 7,150sf (55’ x 130’) to 8,450sf (65’ x 130ft) •Setbacks will remain the same •Front = 25ft •Side = 7.5 ft •Rear = 25ft •All housing products shall meet approved Watermark architectural standards 9 10 Preliminary Plat •60ft wide ROW •30ft paved street •Cul de sacs < 500ft •Sidewalks •Outlots •Wetlands •Open space •Trail corridors •Private park •Preliminary plat meets subdivision ordinance requirements •Consistent with PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Findings of Fact-Preliminary Plat•Consistency with Comprehensive Plan •Consistency with infill policies •Roads or highways to serve the subdivision •Water supply •Waste disposal systems •Finding = Not a premature subdivision 11 Planning & Zoning Board•Board held a public hearing regarding Watermark PUD Amendment #4 on July 12, 2023. •There were no public comments. •Board recommended approval with a 5-0 vote. 12 Council Action•Consider Resolution No. 23-77 Approving PUD Amendment #4 to PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat •Consider Resolution No. 23-78 Approving First Amendment to Master Development Agreement 13 1 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Katie Larsen, City Planner Re: 440 Park Court-Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review BACKGROUND This Work Session staff report provides updates to the July 12, 2023 Planning & Zoning staff report. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). The applicant, Lariat Companies Inc. submitted a Land Use Application for a Concept Plan for a proposed multi-tenant industrial and indoor self-storage building at 440 Park Court. The applicant proposes to construct a 36,000sf building on the south end of the site. The north end of the site is the existing Lino Lakes Storage. Future Land Use Applications may include: •Conditional Use Permit for two (2) or more principal buildings •Site and Building Plan Review This staff report is based on the followings plan sets: •ALTA Survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated June 8, 2023 •Site Plan prepared by Amcon dated June 6, 2023 •Revised Site Plan prepared by Amcon dated June 6, 2023 received July 12, 2023 •Floor Plan and Building Elevations prepared by Amcon dated June 6, 2023 •Applicant Narrative prepared by Bruce Hellier dated June 13, 2023 •Trip General Statement prepared by Traffic Impact Group, LLC dated June 13, 2023 •Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC dated May 11, 2023 ANALYSIS History 2 On September 10, 2018, the City Council passed Resolution No. 18-103 approving a conditional use permit for the mini self-storage facility located on the Phase I, the north half of the 440 Park Court site. Phase II, the south half of the site, was intended for additional mini self-storage facilities; however, in January 2023, the new zoning ordinance was adopted and mini self-storage facilities are no longer allowed in the LI, Light Industrial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct an industrial building with eleven (11) multi-tenant industrial units to be used by construction related businesses (Building 1) and indoor self-storage (Building 2). The revised site plan omits the reference to Building 1 and Building 2. See the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed project description. Zoning and Land Use The subject site is zoned LI, Light Industrial. Construction related business and indoor self-storage are permitted uses; however, a conditional use permit would be needed to allow for two (2) or more principal buildings on site (existing mini-storage facilities and industrialbuilding/storage). Staff Comments: 1. Staff recommends only permitted uses listed in the LI, Light Industrial zoning district beallowed to operate in the multi-tenant industrial building units. Conditional uses would not be allowed. a.For example, auto repair or restoration would not be allowed.b. At the Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the applicant’s representativesupported this.2. Indoor self-storage or storage of personal items in the multi-tenant industrial building units/bays would not be allowed. a.The intent of the units is to provide a location for smaller industrial users tooperate.b. Per City Code Section 1007.001 Definitions, outdoor access to individual units isprohibited for indoor self-storage. SELF-STORAGE, INDOOR. A fully enclosed, climate-controlled building that contains separate, individual and private storage spaces of varying sizes, leased or rented on an individual basis for the storage of personal property. Individual renters’ control and access individual storage spaces and each unit must be directly accessed from the interior of the building via its own access door. Outdoor access to individual units is prohibited. Ancillary retail sales of related items, such as moving supplies, and facility offices may also be included. Such facilities to be used for storage only. c.At the Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the applicant’s representative supported this. 3 Site and Building Plan Review The total site is 5.74 acres. The Phase II area is approximately 2.5 acres. Per the site plan, Building 1 the building has eight (8) 25’ x 60’(1,500sf) industrial units along the north side of the building. On the east side, there are three (3) 25’ x 40’ (1,000sf) industrial units. Building 2 It also has a 120’ x 160’ (19,200sf) indoor self-storage area. There is one (1) mechanical room. The total building is 36,000sf. The site plan shows 18 parking stalls. The existing stormwater pond is proposed to be expanded. Total site impervious coverage is 56% which is less than the maximum 75% allowed. Access to Phase 2 is proposed through the Phase I mini self-storage private driveways. No additional access onto CSAH 23(Lake Drive) is allowed. An 8ft privacy fence and landscaping is shown along the east lot line. Staff Comments: 1. The site and building plan shall meet the performance standards of the City zoning ordinance. 2. The front lot line is along Park Court; therefore, the rear lot line is along the south lot line and the side lot line is along the west lot line. The site plan shall has been revised. 3. Per the June 23, 2023 Lino Lakes Public Safety Memo, Deputy Director Dan L’Allier has concerns about movability of fire apparatus to the access the buildings. A turning radius study is required using Lino Lakes apparatus templates. 4. How do emergency vehicles access the industrial building? a. Discussed the possibility of an emergency access drive along the west side of the existing mini self-storage building. This will still need to be evaluated. 5. How does the general public and employees access the industrial building through the locked gate of the mini self-storage? a. The applicant’s representative stated tenants would be given the gate code and customers were by appointment only. 6. Parking spaces were calculated as warehousing at 1 space for each 2,000sf of gross floor area. 36,000sf gross floor area/2,000sf = 18 spaces. a. City ordinance requires 2 spaces for each employee for Contractor’s Offices and 1 space for each 500 sf of gross floor area for Light Manufacturing. b. Per the applicant’s narrative, a variety of industrial uses are proposed on site other than just warehousing. c. Parking space requirements shall be re-evaluated. d. The revise site plan shows proof of parking to the west of the building. Parking space requirements shall still be evaluated. 7. Wetlands exist along the west lot line and appear to be impacted by the proposed expanded stormwater pond. The revised site plan proposes a separate stormwater pond to the west of the building. 8. More information is needed on the intended use and build out of Building 2 the indoor storage. a. The applicant’s representative explained the indoor storage has permanent storage pods that are rented for personal storage. 9. The site plan shall accurately depict the actual construction of the mini self-storage facility. 4 10. To avoid future confusion, if the project moves forward, the project name should bechanged from Tech Center since this isn’t a technology center proposal. Architectural Plans and Exterior Building Materials Per the applicant’s narrative, the proposed exterior materials consist of rock faced block, glass, hollow metal doors, and prefinished overhead doors. Three (3) colors are shown on the elevations (red, tan and gray). Each unit has a window. The proposed building height is 18’ 2” to the top of the wall. The proposed height is less than the maximum allowed 45ft. Staff Comments 1. The building shall meet the minimum 75% exterior materials of at least two differentclass 1 or class 2 materials.a.To be counted as a primary material, the product must comprise at least 5% of the wall surface. b. Actual material percentages shall be provided to confirm to the proposed class 1glass material and class 2 rock faced block material).2.Restroom facilities are required based on the tenant user examples.a. Per the applicant’s representative, restrooms are provided. 3. Upon further review, staff recommends the building be “flipped” so the unit and self- storage doors are facing west and not Lake Drive. This would give opportunity to createa stronger building façade along Lake Drive. Other City Ordinance and Site Performance Standards Other applicable City ordinances include but are not limited to: •Parking •Grading Plan and Stormwater Management •Public UtilitiesoMunicipal water and sanitary sewer shall be extended to the building. •Landscaping and Tree Preservation •Signage Wetlands Per the Wetland Delineation Report dated May 11, 2023, there are 2 wetland basins on site totaling 0.53 acres. A WCA Notice of Decision approving the delineation is required. An approved wetland mitigation plan is required if the wetlands will be impacted. Staff Comments: 5 1. Staff does not support wetland impacts for stormwater management. The stormwater pond was moved to the west of the proposed building. Floodplain The site is not within a floodplain. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement may be required. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required. Concept Plan The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. Planning & Zoning Board Comments The Board reviewed the concept plan on July 12, 2023 and had the following comments: 1. More information is needed on how the indoor storage functions and operates. 2. Only LI, Light Industrial permitted uses should be allowed in multi-tenant industrial units. 3. The multi-tenant industrial units shall not be used for personal storage. 4. Multi-tenant industrial units were a good use and generally supported. 5. Asked if there would be an onsite manager. Applicant representative stated probably not. 6. Berm along Lake Drive should continue south. 7. The zig zag pattern on the south and west elevations should be omitted. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting Council feedback on the proposed concept plan. Attachments 1. Applicant Narrative 2. Concept Plan, Building Floor Plan & Elevations and ALTA Survey 3. Lino Lakes Fire Division Memo dated June 23, 2023 4. City Engineer Memo dated July 5, 2023 5. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated July 5, 2023 06.13.2023 Katie Larson ACIP City Planner 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Lino Lakes Tech Center New Building Narrative Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Katie, Below is a brief narrative of the proposed building design, image, and material section for the proposed new Lino Lakes Tech Center located at 440 Park Court. The attached application and associated materials are for the Concept Plan Review. The information is based on the enclosed site plans, floor plans, renderings, and elevations. BACKGROUND FOR LINO LAKES PROJECT Lariat Companies, Inc. was formed in 1989 by owner and founder, Ed Flaherty. He has a significant business background that includes starting four companies that grew to over $100M in sales. Applebee’s and Rapid Oil Change are companies that Ed started which you would recognize. As part of his investment strategy, he started Lariat as a family office and real estate company. In 1990 he purchased 40+ acres around the Eden Prairie Center. He built that out over a period of 10 years (all speculative buildings) and owns and manages seven buildings today on that land, Lariat has been a long-term owner of real estate and has mostly done speculative development as an owner and rehab/turnaround of troubled real estate. Currently, lariat owns and manages approximately 1M square feet of retail, industrial, commercial office-warehouse, and self-storage. All this real estate is in Minnesota. As a small business owner, Ed has seen the need for commercial small tenant space and is now creating a number of projects addressing this need. Most office/warehouse for lease space starts at 5,000 square feet and increases from there. That size space is too large for emerging business. Current Lariat projects include buildings in Waconia, Coon Rapids and in Chaska. There are three buildings in Waconia; one building is 12,000 square feet, one building is 9,000 square feet and a third building is 8,000 square feet. There are also two buildings in Bloomington near the Mall of America. The tenant mix in Waconia includes the following uses: plumbing contractor, manufacturer’s rep/showroom, auto restoration, environmental company, flooring distribution and installation, small parts manufacturer, on-line retailer (e-trailer), dry wall contractor, aviation equipment, repair and sales and disaster repair contractor. All of these tenants, but one, came out of operating in their home and/or self-storage spaces. We also have two buildings in Bloomington which have larger bays (2,200 – 2,800 square feet). The tenant mix in these two buildings include granite showroom and fabricator, internet contractor, kitchen cabinet showroom and distributor, apparel goods wholesaler and retailer, printer, small parts manufacturer, CPA, Hispanic spice distributor, T-Shirt screen printer, overhead garage door company, photographer, industrial tool repair and distributor, HVAC contractor, audio visual contractor and distributor, and orthopedic appliance fabricator and repair. Most of these businesses in Bloomington were mature enough they just needed larger space. Lariat has developed management systems that allow us to manage these small users efficiently and effectively. Attachment 1: Applicant Narrative With the “GIG” economy claiming 25% of Americans have a side business or “GIG” and the younger generation expecting to have up to a dozen jobs in a lifetime, the days of a person working for one larger company is less likely. The younger generation have unfavorable attitudes towards large companies and hence some of the impetus to the “GIG”. LINO LAKES CORE VALUES Minimize Light Pollution The nature of the project is small in height, therefore the amount of light emitted will be close to the ground with the minimum of site lighting, the amount of light spillage will be minimal. Welcoming Building This project is accessed on one level and that is the street level only, there are 11 entry doors, one for each suite. Zoning The current zoning is L1 and will not be changed. Sustainable Initiatives The building will be in full compliance with the Minnesota Energy Code requirements. Metering Each suite will have a separate gas, water, and electric meter. TRAFFIC Please see the traffic study. SIGNAGE See existing site signage. MATERIALS Building Façade -Rock faced block, glass, hollow metal doors,Prefinished overhead doors.Roof -Rubber membrane Roof Structure -Wood trussesFloor Structure -Slab on GradeWindows -Vinyl double hungMan Doors -Hollow MetalOverhead Doors -Aluminum prefinished Please contact me if you have any questions or need any clarifications or additional information. Sincerely Bruce Hellier Amcon Construction CONCEPT SITE PLAN 1"=50'36,000 BUILDING S.F.24,256 s.f.PHASE ONEEXISTING BLDGSPHASE TWO15' REAR YARD SET BACK50' F R O N T Y A R D S E T B A C K NE W 5 0 ' B E R M T O M A T C H E X I S T I N G PR O P E R T Y L I N EPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPARK COURTLA K E D R I V E RELOCATEHYDRANT8' W O O D P R I V A C Y F E N C E 249,763 TOTAL S.F. LOTPHASE ONE 91,461 S.F.= 36% SURFACE COVERAGEPHASE TWO 49,443 S.F.= 20% SURFACE COVERAGETOTAL COVERAGE = 140,904 = 56%75% ALLOWED18 PARKING STALLS SHOWN18 REQUIREDEXISTINGON SITEPONDING 120'X160'12,000 sf TOTAL10' SIDE YARD SET BACK 1018 PARKINGSTALLSPHASE TWO NEW BUILDING PHASE ONE EXIST. BUILDINGS8-25'X60' BAYS 1,500 sf EACH3 25x40 BAYS1,000 SF EACH3,000 sf TOTALMECH RMEXPANDEDPONDING182 34 56791,461 s.f.CONCEPT PLANSITE PHOTOSBUILDING ELEVATIONSBUILDING FLOOR PLANSHEET INDEX4,391± S.F.4,398± S.F.4,370± S.F.4,335± S.F. 4,403± S.F.4,003± S.F. 1,196± S.F. 3,0 0 0 ± S . F . 4,386± S.F.2.794± S.F.1,204± S.F.2,198± S.F.16PROOF OF PARKING 14 STALLS AERIAL MAP 1"=100'PROJECTLOCATIONPHASE 2SCHWANSASMODEENEW IMAGECOATINGRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYKLMBTRANSPORTATIONBLUE HERONELEMENTARYSCHOOL440 PARK COURTSTORAGEASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESLOWSCRUBBRUSHPONDLOWSCRUBBRUSHZONEDL IPROJECT NAME: 440 PARKS STORAGE PHASE 2SITE ADDRESS: 440 PARK COURTLINO LAKES, MN 55014TOTAL PARCEL: 5.73 ACZONING: L-I LIGHT INDUSTRIALTAX PARCEL #: 17-31-22-32-0019INTENDED USE: LIGHT INDUST. STORAGEEXISTING USE: VACANT LOT, GRASS COVEREDSETBACKSREQUIREDFRONT50'SIDE10'REAR15'PARKING 1 SPACE PER 2,000 SF18 REQ. 18 PROVIDEDBUILDING CONTRACTORAMCON CONSTRUCTION6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE #101MINNETONKA, MN 55345CONTACT: WAYDE JOHNSONPHONE: 651-379-9016WJOHNSON@AMCONCONSTRUCTION.COMOWNER APPLICANTLARIAT COMPANIES INC.8345 CRYSTAL VIEW RD STE 200EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344ARCHITECTAMCON CONSTRUCTION6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE #101MINNETONKA, MN 55345SURVEYORE.G. RUD & SONS INC.6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONTACT: JASON RUDPHONE: 651-361-8200WWW.EGRUD.COMSEE THE PHASE ONE SITE STUDY FOR THE HISTORY OF THE SITE, ANDANY HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT FEATURES.SEE THE WETLANDS STUDY FOR ALL DELINEATED WETLAND ON SITE.ZONING MAPLINO LAKES TECH CENTER440 PARK COURT LINO LAKES MN 55014© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23C.P.Attachment 2: Concept Plan, Building Floor Plan & Elevations and ALTA Survey PROJECTLOCATIONPHASE 2SCHWANSRESIDENTIALSINGLE FAMILYTRANSPORTATIONBLUE HERONELEMENTARYSCHOOL440 PARK COURTSTORAGEASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESASH, BIRCH,COTTONWOODMATURE TREESLOWSCRUBBRUSHPONDLOWSCRUBBRUSHSITE IMAGES NO SCALESITE PHOTOS© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23 118'-11 1/2"40'-0"59'-4 1/2"24'-3 1/4"19'-4"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-7"24'-2"200'-2"0'-7 1/2"0'-5"0'-5"0'-5"0'-5"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"3'-4"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"1'-3"2'-0"3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"0'-8"0'-10 1/4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"FLOOR PLAN1A101SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0" 0'-8" 3'-4" 2'-0" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-0"3'-4" 25'-0"24'-0"24'-0 1/2" 0'-6"0'-6"180'-0"0'-7 1/2" 24'-6 3/4" 60'-2 1/2"158'-3 1/2"A101© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23 EAST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION© ISSUES / REVISIONS:DESIGN/BUILD | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | GENERAL CONTRACTING 6121 BAKER ROAD, SUITE 101 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 651-379-9090 FAX: 651-379-9091 CERTIFICATION LINO LAKES TECH CENTER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 440 PARK COURT, LINO LAKES, MN 55014CONCEPT PLAN 06.06.23ELEV. ONE VISION. ONE MISSION. LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT. Lino Lakes Public Safety Department Memo , DATE: June 23, 2023 TO: Katie Larsen, City Planner CC: John Swenson, Public Safety Director FROM: Dan LAllier, Deputy Director RE: 440 Park Court Project Proposal After reviewing the conceptual plan for 440 Park Court, I have serious concerns about the movability for fire apparatus to access the buildings indicated in the project proposal. My recommendation would be to complete a turning study, using our apparatus. I will include the wheelbase of our apparatus with this memo. Attachment 3: Lino Lakes Fire Division Memo dated June 23, 2023 APPARATUS MODEL CONSTRUCTION:PUMP MAKE/MODEL/CAP.:TANK CAP.: DRAWN BY: REV. STAGE/DATE Osceola, WI 54020 -- (715) 294-2555 NOTE: Detailed specifications for this apparatus supersede this presentation drawing. Items shown on this drawing but not detailed within the specifications maybe optional add-on features. This drawing is proprietary and confidential. SPARTAN GLADIATOR LFD 24" RR TME TANDEM 450.5"BOLTED STAINLESS STEEL BODY 2000GPM WATEROUS CSU + CPK 300GPM PTO 2200 WMK PRE-CONTRACTSALES REP: WMK PROJECT ENGR: TBD REV. STAGE/DATE FINAL PROPOSAL REV. STAGE/DATE POST PREBUILD REV. STAGE/DATE ENGINEERING CUSTOMER TITLE/LEAD: DAN L'ALLIER7.26.22 NA NA NA FIRE CHIEF FINAL DESIGN CUSTOMER SIGN OFF date: OAL:WB:OAH: 223"132" Reference Scale (inches) 120 3624 Each increment eTuals one inch at full scale. 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 5"5" 5"5"5" 5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5" 5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5" 5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5" 5" 5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5"5" 5"5"5"5" 5"5"5"5" 2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5" 2.5" 2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5" 2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5" 2.5" 2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5"2.5" Reference Scale (inches) 120 3624 Each increment eTuals one inch at full scale. pack floor dry 2 ext with fuel fill cabinet cabinet cabinet cabinet suctiondischarge 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75"1.75" 3 bottlefloor dry3 bottle STIHL TS 420 STIHL STIHLMS 361 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: July 5, 2023 Re: Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review 023187-000 WSB reviewed the concept plans for the Lino Lakes Tech Center site in Lino Lakes, MN, received June 22, 2023. The site is 2.34 acres and located at 440 Park Court west of Lake Drive (CSAH 23). The lot has frontage along Lake Drive (CSAH 23). Comments were made on the following documents: •Lino Lakes Tech Center plans prepared by Amcon, dated June 6, 2023, received June22, 2023. •Geotechnical Report prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering, Inc., dated October 4, 2017,received April 10, 2023. •Trip Generation Statement, dated June 13, 2023. •Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, dated May 11, 2023. •Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared American Engineering and Testing,Inc. dated January 8, 2018 The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering •Grading The plans at this time do not include a specific site grading plan for the proposed parking lot, storm water basins, and tech center. The area proposed for the Lino Lakes Tech Center has previously been identified to contain construction debris materials buried underneath the existing site. A Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP) have been drafted to include that grading of the site proposes capping or necessary removal of the debris as part of the site preparation. An expansion is proposed on the west side of the existing pond to provide treatment and storage for the site. This expansion will need to remain outside the delineated wetland. Comments: 1. Provide a grading plan meeting City requirements. 2.The applicant shall note that site grading work shall be done in accordance with theapproved MPCA Response Action Plan (RAP) and Contingency Construction Plan (CCP). Provide updated documentation regarding the current state of the RAP. Attachment 4: City Engineer Memo dated July 5,2023 Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 2 Lino Lake Tech Center Engineering Review •Stormwater Management The stormwater management for Lino Lakes Tech Center consists of a pond expansion on the west side of the parcel. Comments: 1.The applicant shall provide an updated Stormwater Management Reportdemonstrating the appropriate sizing and treatment for the expansion. •Water Supply Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. The applicant will be required to extend water from the adjacent site. Comments: 1.Applicant to provide a utility plan for the site meeting City requirements.2.We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review theproposed plan when submitted •Sanitary Sewer Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. Sanitary sewer maybe required depending on use. •Transportation Lino Lakes Tech Center proposes connecting to the existing storage site to the north for access off of Park Court with paved private access to each of the units throughout the site. The 2003 EAW analyzed this parcel as a light industrial user with two (2) professional office buildings totally 28,800 sf. The existing mini self-storage facility together with the Tech Center will produce less traffic than two professional office buildings and therefore, is consistent with the EAW findings. No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated and a traffic study is not required. There should be no site access off o Lake Drive per Anoka County Access Policy. Comments: 1.Vehicle access through the existing storage facility is a concern. We recommendadditional evaluation.2.The applicant shall provide a pavement removal/replacement and site plans3.The applicant shall note if curb & gutter will be used •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Wetlands are shown on the existing survey for the site. Comments: 1.The existing wetland is not in the Wetland Mapping Corridor (WMC)a.Show and call out the required minimum 10' wetland buffer size. •Landscaping Ms. Katie Larsen 07/05/2023 Page 3 Lino Lake Tech Center Engineering Review Landscaping plans were not provided as part of the submittal. The City’s Environmental Coordinator to review landscaping and provide in-depth comments when provided •Floodplain No floodplain impacts are proposed on site. •Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are required for stormwater systems. •Development Agreement A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration. •Permits Required 1.NPDES General Construction Permit2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for construction3.Rice Creek Watershed Permit4.Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – approvedRAP and CCP5.Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit if grading work extends into their right of way. If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: July 5th, 2023 Re: Environmental Staff Comments/July 5th, 2023/440 Park Court RECOMMENDATIONS 1.A landscaping plan must be submitted that complies with city landscapingrequirements which are detailed on pgs. 102-117 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2.There is a Natural Resources Conservation Area on the west portion of the site.Any trees removed from this area will have higher mitigation plantingrequirements. Preserving as many of the trees in this area would be preferable.Trees preserved must be protected with Tree Protection Fence installed inaccordance with the city detail. 3.Swamp blackberry (Rubus semisitosus), a threatened plant in Minnesota, has beenfound on or near the proposed project site. A rare species survey must be completedfor the site. A permit from the Minnesota DNR may be required for any impacts to this species. 4.Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii), a threatened species in Minnesota, has beenfound within a mile of the project site. MN DNR flyer and factsheet must be providedto all contractors working on the site. Environmental Memo Attachment 5: Environmental Coordinator Memo dated July 5, 2023 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 3 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Otter Lake Road Extension Plans and Specifications Background The Otter Lake Road Master Plan study was completed and presented to the City Council in December of 2022. The study identified the preferred alignment for the extension of Otter Lake Road from Main Street (CSAH 14) to its intersection with 24th Avenue. With the current need for regional stormwater management improvements to support development along the corridor along with an arterial transportation corridor, staff is proposing to begin preparation of plans and specifications. The project is currently identified in the City’s long range financial plan for construction in 2025. Phase 1 stormwater improvements are also scheduled for construction in 2024. The project would include the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and water main, storm sewer and regional ponding, pedestrian/bicycle facilities along with the roadway. The project length is approximately ¾ of a mile. The preliminary estimated cost is $8.4 million. WSB and Associates have submitted a proposal to complete the plans and specification in the amount of $468,258. Funding for the project is anticipated primarily from, municipal state aid, trunk utility fund, and surface water management fund. Staff will be exploring grant opportunities through the State of Minnesota as well. Funding will be partially offset by future connection charges as development take place along the corridor. Initiating the design will assist in refining the project costs, identifying funding sources, along with solidifying the preferred alignment and identifying right-of-way needs. WSB will be holding two open houses and along with individual property owner meetings as part of the project development. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting City Council direction to place the authorization for preparation of plans and specification on the August 14, 2023 agenda. Attachments 1. Otter Lake Road Preferred Alignment 440 Park Court-Lino Lakes Tech Center Concept Plan Review Work Session August 7, 2023 Land Use Application•Applicant: Lariat Companies Inc •Concept Plan Review •Multi-tenant industrial & indoor self-storage building •Future Land Use Applications may include: •Conditional Use Permit for two (2) or more principal buildings •Existing mini self-storage facilities + proposed industrial/storage building •Site and Building Plan Review 2 3 History •September 10, 2018: Res. No. 18-103 passed CUP for mini self-storage facility •Phase I (north): mini self-storage facility •Phase II (south): potential future mini self- storage facility •January 2023: •New zoning ordinance adopted •Mini self-storage no longer allowed in LI •Indoor self-storage facility is allowed •Total site = 5.74 acres •Phase II = 2.5 acres 4 •Zoning = LI, Light Industrial •Construction related business and indoor self-storage are permitted uses •Only LI permitted uses allowed in units/bays. •No CUP uses e.g. auto repair, outdoor storage •No indoor self-storage or personal item storage in units/bays •Intent is to provide location for smaller industrial users to operate •Job creation •Access to Phase 2 is proposed through the Phase I mini self-storage private driveways. •No additional access onto CSAH 23(Lake Drive) is allowed. 5 Site & Building Plan Review •Industrial Units: •8 along north side: •25’ x 60’(1,500sf) •3 along east side: •25’ x 40’ (1,000sf) •Indoor self-storage area : •120’ x 160’ (19,200sf). •Total building is 36,000sf. •18 parking stalls. •16 proof of parking added •8ft privacy fence and landscaping is shown along the east lot line. •Public Safety expressed concerns about access to building. •How do employees and customers access thru locked gate? 6 Architectural Plans •rock faced block •glass windows •hollow metal doors •prefinished overhead doors •3 colors •Red, tan, gray •Height: 18’2” < 45’ •75% exterior materials must be least two different class 1 or class 2 materials. •Class 1 = glass •Must be at 5% •Class 2 = rock faced block •Restrooms = Yes Other City Ordinances & Regulations•Parking •Warehousing: 1 space per 2,000sf gross floor (36,000sf/2,000sf = 18 spaces) •City ordinance requires 2 spaces for each employee for Contractor’s Offices and 1 space for each 500 sf of gross floor area for Light Manufacturing. •16 proof of parking added. Still needs to be evaluated. •Grading Plan and Stormwater Management •Staff does not support wetland impacts for stormwater management •SW pond relocated to west of building •Public Utilities •Municipal water and sanitary sewer shall be extended to the building. 7 Planning & Zoning Board CommentsBoard reviewed on July 12, 2023 and had the following comments: 1.More information is needed on how indoor self-storage functions and operates. 2.Only LI, Light Industrial permitted uses should be allowed in multi-tenant industrial units. 3.The multi-tenant industrial units shall not be used for personal storage. 4.Multi-tenant industrial units were a good use and generally supported. 5.Asked if there would be an onsite manager. Applicant representative stated probably not. 6.Berm along Lake Drive should continue south. 7.The zig zag pattern on the south and west elevations should be omitted.8 Requested Council DirectionStaff is requesting Council feedback on the proposed concept plan. 9 MAIN STREETROSEMARY WAYHERI TAGE PARKWAY158TH STREET NE MP R E S S A VE N U E N 165TH STREET N170TH STREET N80TH STREET ELINO LAKES HUGO Legend ROADWAY SHOULDERS (PAVED) CURB SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WETLAND BOUNDARY PARCEL LINES SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 INTERSTATE 35 K:\015120-000\Cad\Layout\015120-000_loAll.dgn AND THE NEW CONNECTION TO ELMCREST REMOVING ELMCREST BETWEEN HERITAGE WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 4 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Apollo Business Park Business Expansion Background The Apollo Business Park was established in the early 1990’s to provide land for economic development and expand the City’s tax base. Over the past year staff has been working with two of the local businesses on expansion opportunities. Both companies are long term occupants of the park in need of additional space. In both cases expansion area on the sites is not large enough to accommodate the user’s needs. Both users prefer to stay at their current locations. As a potential solution staff is evaluating the use of adjacent city owned and state owned (tax forfeit) properties. These properties where originally created as borrow pits for grading in the development and subsequently used for stormwater runoff. We believe there is capacity in the lots that would allow for some building expansion and/or use for additional stormwater from new construction. If it is determined that the properties could be used for expansion purposes, staff is proposing transfer of the currently tax exempt properties to the industrial users. The state owned properties would need to be obtained through Anoka County. Any costs associated with this would be the responsibility of the end user. The City would retain drainage and utility easements over the ponding areas. Staff would suggest a nominal fee for the city property since it would still be encumbered by stormwater facilities and easements. However, that would be further evaluated if the projects move forward. The EDAC is discussing the item at their August 3, 2023 regular meeting. Their recommendation will be forwarded to the Council at the work session. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting discussion on the City Council’s receptiveness to the City facilitating land transfers to accommodate manufacturing expansion. Attachments 1.Site Location Map 4thAve74th St 12 MarshanLn 35W 23 ParkCt Legend Address Labels Parcels July 27, 2023± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 406 Ft Apollo Business Expansion WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 5 Date: To: From: Re: August 14, 2023 City Council Kyle Leibel, Deputy Public Safety Director, Police Division Consideration of an ordinance prohibiting cannabis use in public Background With the passage of legislation which now legalizes the possession and use of limited amounts of cannabis in Minnesota, there are new concerns, locally, over the use of cannabis in public places and on public property. It is staff’s belief that current Lino Lakes Ordinances do not adequately address the potential problems resulting from the use of cannabis in public places and on public grounds. Through a review of current ordinances, staff has determined that Lino Lakes ordinance pertaining to tobacco (ord. 602) is specific to tobacco and does not address cannabis. Additionally, the ordinance pertaining to the use of alcohol in/on public parks and grounds (ord. 301.05) also fails to address the foreseeable problems with the use of cannabis in such places. Minnesota statutes prohibit smoking via the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (Minn. Stat. 144.414), and this includes the smoking of marijuana/cannabis (Minn. Stat. 144.413, Subd.4) in public places. However, this statute specifically defines public place as indoor areas (Minn. Stat, 144.413, Subd. 2); it does not address outdoor public spaces. Requested Council Direction Staff is asking for Council direction on next steps, if Council opts to restrict or limit the use of cannabis in public places and on public property throughout Lino Lakes. If Council wishes to address use of cannabis in public places/on public property, staff will present a proposed ordinance for consideration at the August 14, 2023 regular meeting. WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 6 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Kyle Leibel, Public Safety Deputy Director Re: Public Safety Update Update Staff will be on hand to present the 1st and 2nd Quarter 2023 Public Safety Update. Attachments Q1 and Q2 Quarterly Report 8/2/2023 2:12 PM • First Quarter Average Response Time (emergency & non-emergency) 6 minutes and 19 seconds. • Second Quarter Average Response Time (emergency & non-emergency) 6 minutes and 50 seconds. First Quarter • 2023 Q2 Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes and 45 seconds. • 2023 Q2 Average non-emergency response for medicals, 5 minutes and 42 seconds. • Police staff responded Second Quarter • 2023 Q2 Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes and 45 seconds. • 2023 Q2 Average non-emergency response for medicals, 5 minutes and 42 seconds. • Police staff responded to all 294 medical calls for service (CFS) and Fire staff responded to 64 medical CFS. YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 3,144 3,660 6,804 2022 2,531 3,265 5,796 CASE NUMBERS GENERATED Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 13:55:30 23:06:43 37:02:13 2022 11:06:10 15:27:17 26:33:27 STACKED CALLS REPORT YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 300 294 594 2022 222 235 457 MEDICAL CALLS FOR SERVICE Lino Lakes Public Safety Department QUARTERLY REPORT 2023 Q1 & Q2 01/01/2023 – 06/30/2023 FIRE DIVISION NFR'S Q1 2022 Q1 2023 Q2 2022 Q2 2023 Y-to-D 2022 Y-to-D 2023 100 Fire 7 5 14 7 22 12 200 Overpressure Explosion, Overheat - No Fire 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Rescue & EMS Incidents 34 121 48 81 87 202 400 Hazardous Conditions - No Fire 12 15 14 16 23 31 500 Service Call 18 37 27 27 48 64 600 Good Intent Call 4 24 13 35 24 59 700 False Alarms & False Calls 18 17 16 18 38 35 800 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 Special Incident 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 93 219 132 184 242 403 FIRE DIVISION YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 8 51 29 13 126 227 2022 13 45 35 16 0 109 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station Q1 YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 9 43 38 12 91 193 2022 13 40 26 16 32 126 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station Q2 YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 17 94 67 25 217 420 2022 25 85 61 32 32 235 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 16 9 25 2022 16 6 22 MUTUAL AID GIVEN Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 2 2 4 2022 2 5 7 MUTUAL AID RECEIVED POLICE DIVISION NIBRS Description - Group A Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aggravated Assault 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6 3 3 Simple Assault 8 7 18 13 8 7 15 14 16 14 33 27 Intimidation 1 0 4 4 2 2 5 5 3 2 9 9 Burglary/Breaking & Entering 6 1 0 0 3 1 4 1 9 2 4 1 Counterfeiting/Forgery 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 6 5 Destruction / Damage / Vandalism of Property 13 3 4 1 13 4 12 4 26 7 16 5 Drugs/Narcotic Violation 17 15 8 7 8 8 6 5 25 23 14 12 Drug Equipment Violations 11 9 7 6 9 8 6 5 20 17 13 11 Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion / Blackmail 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 4 0 False Pretenses/Swindle/Con 4 2 3 1 7 2 4 1 11 4 7 2 Credit Card/Automated Teller Machine Fraud 1 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 6 0 Wire Fraud 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 Impersonation 0 0 6 6 3 3 5 0 3 3 6 6 Identity Theft 12 0 7 0 12 2 5 1 24 2 12 0 Hacking/Computer Invasion 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Kidnapping/Abduction 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Purse-Snatching 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket-Picking 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Shoplifting 8 6 4 3 2 1 13 11 10 7 17 14 Theft from Building 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 4 2 4 1 Theft from Motor Vehicle 9 0 1 0 9 2 4 0 18 2 5 1 Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts or Accessories 2 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 All other Larceny 52 7 13 7 26 6 22 4 78 13 35 11 Motor Vehicle Theft 1 0 4 4 2 2 0 0 3 2 4 4 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pornography/Obscene Material 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 Forcible Rape 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 Forcible Sodomy 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Forcible Fondling 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 1 Stolen Property Offenses 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 Weapon Law Violations 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 1 3 3 5 1 TOTAL 158 62 98 58 126 56 123 57 284 119 216 116 Solve Rate Qtr 2 2023 46% Y-to-D 2022 42% Qtr 2 2022Qtr 1 2023Qtr 1 2022 39% Y-to-D 2023 54%44%59% 2022/2023 Qtrly Clearance Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Property Crimes 113 23 20%52 26 50%92 27 29%76 24 32% Violent Crimes 12 11 92%23 15 65%13 11 85%18 16 89% 2022/2023 YTD Clearance Rate Property Crimes Violent Crimes 205 25 Arrest 50 22 Solve Rate 24% 88% 40% 78% Off 128 41 Arrest 51 32 Year-to-Date 2023 Solve Rate Year-to-Date 2022 Off Q1 2022 Q1 2023 Q2 2022 Q2 2023 NIBRS Description - Group B Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Bad Checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curfew/Loitering/Vagrancy Violation 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 Disorderly Conduct 12 6 17 13 12 6 15 6 24 12 32 19 Driving Under Influence 34 34 64 64 19 19 51 47 53 53 115 111 Family Offenses, Nonviolent 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 Liquor Law Violations 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 10 10 Trespass of Real Property 6 6 0 0 5 5 4 4 11 11 4 4 TOTAL 54 48 85 81 42 36 81 64 96 84 166 145 SOLVE RATE Y-to-D 2023 87% Qtr 2 2023 79%88% Y-to-D 2022Qtr 1 2023 95% Qtr 2 2022 86%89% Qtr 1 2022 2022/2023 Overall Clearance Rate Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Group A 158 62 98 58 126 56 118 56 284 118 216 116 Group B 54 48 85 81 42 36 81 64 96 84 166 145 TOTAL 212 110 183 139 168 92 199 120 380 202 382 261 SOLVE RATE Q1 2022 Q1 2023 52%76% Q2 2022 Q2 2023 Y-to-D 2022 Y-to-D 2023 55%60%53%68% YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 11 19 30 2022 4 15 19 FELONY CASE FILE SUBMISSIONS Q1 and Q2, 2023 Notable Actions & Events • February 2, Career Fair Alexandria Technical and Community College • February 16, Career Fair Bemidji State University and Northwest Technical College • February 16, Officer Bergeron’s Pink Patch Project Donation of $8,350 to Hope Chest • February 24, 7th Annual Guns N Hoses Charity Classic Hockey game • February 28, Career Fair Minnesota State University Mankato • April 19, Career Fair Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College • May 6, Back Your Buddy Event • May 6, Rice Lake Elementary Truck Day • May 16, Lino Lakes STEM School Track & Field Day • May 19, Blue Heron Elementary School Walk-a-thon Festival • June 29, Centennial Middle School Parade Lino Lakes Public Safety One Vision. One Mission. John Swenson Public Safety Director Quarterly Update June 30, 2023 One Vision. One Mission. The mission of the Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is to collaborate with the community to provide: •a healthy and safe community; •a focus on prevention; •a commitment to life safety; •aggressive pursuit of criminals; •respectful communication; •encouragement for volunteerism. One Vision. One Mission. First and Second Quarter Statistics One Vision. One Mission. First Quarter Average Response Time (emergency & non-emergency) 6 minutes and 19 seconds Second Quarter Average Response Time (emergency & non-emergency) 6 minutes and 50 seconds YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 3,144 3,660 6,804 2022 2,531 3,265 5,796 CASE NUMBERS GENERATED Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 13:55:30 23:06:43 37:02:13 2022 11:06:10 15:27:17 26:33:27 STACKED CALLS REPORT One Vision. One Mission. First Quarter •Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes and 49 seconds. •Average non-emergency response for medicals, 5 minutes and 36 seconds. •Police staff responded to all 300 medical calls for service (CFS) and Fire staff responded to 84 medical CFS. Second Quarter •Average emergency response for medicals, 4 minutes and 45 seconds. •Average non-emergency response for medicals, 5 minutes and 42 seconds. •Police staff responded to all 294 medical calls for service (CFS) and Fire staff responded to 64 medical CFS. YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 300 294 594 2022 222 235 457 MEDICAL CALLS FOR SERVICE One Vision. One Mission. NFR'S Q1 2022 Q1 2023 Q2 2022 Q2 2023 Y-to-D 2022 Y-to-D 2023 100 Fire 7 5 14 7 22 12 200 Overpressure Explosion, Overheat - No Fire 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Rescue & EMS Incidents 34 121 48 81 87 202 400 Hazardous Conditions - No Fire 12 15 14 16 23 31 500 Service Call 18 37 27 27 48 64 600 Good Intent Call 4 24 13 35 24 59 700 False Alarms & False Calls 18 17 16 18 38 35 800 Severe Weather & Natural Disaster 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 Special Incident 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 93 219 132 184 242 403 FIRE DIVISION One Vision. One Mission. YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 17 94 67 25 217 420 2022 25 85 61 32 32 235 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station YTD YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 8 51 29 13 126 227 2022 13 45 35 16 0 109 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station Q1 YEAR Police Staff Station 1 Station 2 Duty Officer Duty Crew Total 2023 9 43 38 12 91 193 2022 13 40 26 16 32 126 Lino Lakes Public Safety Calls by Month and Station Q2 One Vision. One Mission. One Vision. One Mission. One Vision. One Mission. One Vision. One Mission. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 16 9 25 2022 16 6 22 MUTUAL AID GIVEN Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 2 2 4 2022 2 5 7 MUTUAL AID RECEIVED One Vision. One Mission. Group A Offenses and Arrests: NIBRS Description - Group A Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aggravated Assault 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6 3 3 Simple Assault 8 7 18 13 8 7 15 14 16 14 33 27 Intimidation 1 0 4 4 2 2 5 5 3 2 9 9 Burglary/Breaking & Entering 6 1 0 0 3 1 4 1 9 2 4 1 Counterfeiting/Forgery 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 6 5Destruction / Damage / Vandalism of Property 13 3 4 1 13 4 12 4 26 7 16 5 Drugs/Narcotic Violation 17 15 8 7 8 8 6 5 25 23 14 12 Drug Equipment Violations 11 9 7 6 9 8 6 5 20 17 13 11 Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion / Blackmail 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 4 0 False Pretenses/Swindle/Con 4 2 3 1 7 2 4 1 11 4 7 2Credit Card/Automated Teller Machine Fraud 1 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 6 0 Wire Fraud 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 Impersonation 0 0 6 6 3 3 5 0 3 3 6 6 Identity Theft 12 0 7 0 12 2 5 1 24 2 12 0 Hacking/Computer Invasion 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Kidnapping/Abduction 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Purse-Snatching 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket-Picking 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Shoplifting 8 6 4 3 2 1 13 11 10 7 17 14 Theft from Building 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 4 2 4 1 Theft from Motor Vehicle 9 0 1 0 9 2 4 0 18 2 5 1 Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts or Accessories 2 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 All other Larceny 52 7 13 7 26 6 22 4 78 13 35 11 Motor Vehicle Theft 1 0 4 4 2 2 0 0 3 2 4 4 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pornography/Obscene Material 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 Forcible Rape 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 Forcible Sodomy 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Forcible Fondling 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 3 1 Stolen Property Offenses 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 Weapon Law Violations 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 1 3 3 5 1 TOTAL 158 62 98 58 126 56 123 57 284 119 216 116 Solve Rate Qtr 2 2023 46% Y-to-D 2022 42% Qtr 2 2022Qtr 1 2023Qtr 1 2022 39% Y-to-D 2023 54%44%59% One Vision. One Mission. Group B Offenses and Arrests: NIBRS Description - Group B Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Bad Checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curfew/Loitering/Vagrancy Violation 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 Disorderly Conduct 12 6 17 13 12 6 15 6 24 12 32 19 Driving Under Influence 34 34 64 64 19 19 51 47 53 53 115 111 Family Offenses, Nonviolent 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 Liquor Law Violations 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 10 10 Trespass of Real Property 6 6 0 0 5 5 4 4 11 11 4 4 TOTAL 54 48 85 81 42 36 81 64 96 84 166 145 SOLVE RATE Y-to-D 2023 87% Qtr 2 2023 79%88% Y-to-D 2022Qtr 1 2023 95% Qtr 2 2022 86%89% Qtr 1 2022 2022/2023 Overall Clearance Rate Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Off Arrest Group A 158 62 98 58 126 56 118 56 284 118 216 116 Group B 54 48 85 81 42 36 81 64 96 84 166 145 TOTAL 212 110 183 139 168 92 199 120 380 202 382 261 SOLVE RATE Q1 2022 Q1 2023 52%76% Q2 2022 Q2 2023 Y-to-D 2022 Y-to-D 2023 55%60%53%68% One Vision. One Mission. YEAR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL 2023 11 19 30 2022 4 15 19 FELONY CASE FILE SUBMISSIONS 2022/2023 Qtrly Clearance Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Off Arrest Solve Rate Property Crimes 113 23 20%52 26 50%92 27 29%76 24 32% Violent Crimes 12 11 92%23 15 65%13 11 85%18 16 89% 2022/2023 YTD Clearance Rate Property Crimes Violent Crimes 205 25 Arrest 50 22 Solve Rate 24% 88% 40% 78% Off 128 41 Arrest 51 32 Year-to-Date 2023 Solve Rate Year-to-Date 2022 Off Q1 2022 Q1 2023 Q2 2022 Q2 2023 One Vision. One Mission. First and Second Quarter Notable Events February 2, Career Fair Alexandria Technical and Community College February 16, Career Fair Bemidji State University and Northwest Technical College February 16, Officer Bergeron’s Pink Patch Project Donation of $8,350 to Hope Chest February 24, 7th Annual Guns N Hoses Charity Classic Hockey game February 28, Career Fair Minnesota State University Mankato April 19, Career Fair Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College May 6, Back Your Buddy Event May 6, Rice Lake Elementary Truck Day May 16, Lino Lakes STEM School Track & Field Day May 19, Blue Heron Elementary School Walk-a-thon Festival June 29, Centennial Middle School Parade One Vision. One Mission. Public Safety Staff Update Police –26 personnel (authorized 28) Fire –26 personnel (authorized 2 FTE, 40 Paid-on-Call Firefighters, and 15 PT Firefighters) Administration –6 personnel (authorized 4 FTE, 3 part-time) One Police Officer currently in field training. Police Officer Hiring Process –One conditional job offer accepted and currently accepting applications. Part-time Firefighter Hiring Process –Three candidates in background and currently accepting applications. Paid-on-Call Firefighter Hiring Process –Currently accepting applications. One Vision. One Mission. 2023 Areas of Focus UPDATE •Employee Wellness •Firefighter and Police Officer Recruitment •Employee Retention Employee Wellness Update •90 Day Immersion Results: 18 Participants •103 lbs of total weight loss •19% reduction in body fat •Overall increase of 13.3 lbs of muscle. •All 18 had at least one heart disease risk factor improve. •Most had at least three areas of improvement in their health. •All 18 improved their Functional Movement Score, reducing chances for movement-related injuries. Questions WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 9 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Driveway Access Agreement Insurance Requirements Background There are a number of private residential driveways in the city that use unimproved public right-of-way to access city streets. The unimproved right-of-way is land dedicated for use as a public street, typically stubbed to an abutting parcel, with improvements pending future development. In most cases these areas are used by an abutting large residential or rural lots for street access. In two cases that staff is aware of, the City entered into driveway access agreements that included, in part, a requirement for the property owner to indemnify the city against any claims related to the property owner’s use of the right-of-way. Additionally the agreement required the owner to provide evidence of insurance in the amount of $300,000 and name the City as an additional insured. An insurance certificate is typically provided annually. The insurance condition is not uniformly required in all cases where unimproved right-of-way is used for private driveways. In most cases these situations have existed for over 25 years. The insurance certificate has historically only been received from one property. This has routinely required repeated attempts by city staff to obtain the information. After review by the City Attorney we are proposing to drop the requirement to provide insurance naming the City as an additional insured. The driveways have been in place for many years so any likelihood of a liability issue arising is remote. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting concurrence by the City Council to drop the insurance requirement naming the city as an additional insured. Attachments 1. Example driveway location map Legend Address Labels Parcels August 4, 2023± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 51 Ft 6394 Otter Lake Road WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 10 Date: August 7, 2023 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Re: Carole Estates 2nd Addition Land Sale (closed discussion) Background The City Council discussed the possible sale of Lots 12 & 13, Block 2 of Carole Estates 2nd Addition and a remnant of 7685 Lake Drive at a special meeting on July 24, 2023. The City Council directed staff to continue negotiations with the proposed buyer. Staff provided the buyer with a counter offer and continued negotiations. Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c) (3), allows for the meeting to be closed to discuss offers for the sale of property. Staff will provide the City Council with a revised offer for consideration. If acceptable to the City Council staff will work with the City Attorney to prepare a purchase agreement for consideration. The sale of property requires a public hearing and adoption of an ordinance. Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting City Council close the hearing to allow for discussion of the proposed purchase offer. Attachments 1. None City Council Work Session Session Items 3,4,9 & 10 August 7, 2023 2 Item 3 Otter Lake Road Extension 3 Item 4 Apollo Business Park Expansion 4 Item 9 Driveway Access Agreement 5 Item 10 Purchase of Carole Estates Lots 12 & 13, 7685 Lake Drive THANK YOU