Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/13/2023 P&Z Combined Packet
CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, September 13, 2023 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 9, 2023 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Synthetic Grass B. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage at 2300 Main Street (Glamos Wire, Inc.) C. PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-General Updates 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates 8. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike – The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more – groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing – Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on August 9, 2023. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Kohler moved to approve the July 12, 2023 meeting minutes with one correction to Mr. Root’s title. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 6 – 0. Mr. Wipperfurth abstained. 5. OPEN MIKE Mr. Root declared open mike at 6:32 p.m. There were no public comments. Mr. Wipperfurth moved to close open mike. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 7 – 0. Open mike was closed at 6:32 p.m. DATE: August 9, 2023 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 6:42 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech Michael Root, Perry Laden, Neil Evenson, Patrick Kohler, SaraJo Stewart MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Katie Larsen, Julie Whitney Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2023 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Milestones Addition Final Plat Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. The applicant, MEP Lino Lakes, submitted a land use application for Milestones Addition final plat. The plat creates 2 commercial lots. Lot 1 is 1.86 acres for the purpose of constructing a 16,941 sf commercial day care facility called Lil’ Explorers Childcare Center. Outlot A will be a future commercial development and a formal site plan will be reviewed at later date. Jennifer Schultz, representing Milestones, was in attendance. She had no questions or comments. Mr. Root questioned if the Engineer staff report contained open items. Ms. Larsen said there were some minor items they were working through, but it did not affect the final plat. Mr. Laden moved to approve the Milestones Addition Final Plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Motion carried 7-0. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Ms. Larsen provided an update on projects. Mr. Laden questioned if Sadder Automotive was going to be recognized by the City and if it was added to the City Council agenda. Ms. Larsen believes it is still part of the narrative and that she will look into it. Mr. Vojtech moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Meeting adjourned at 6:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Julie Whitney – Community Development Administrative Assistant 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: September 13, 2023 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Synthetic Grass CASE NUMBER: TA2023-008 APPLICANT: ForeverLawn Minnesota Inc. Attn: Troy Johnson 23255 Woodland Road Lakeville, MN 55044 OWNER: Jon Lipinski 75 Robinson Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: August 18, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline: October 17, 2023 120-Day Review Deadline: December 16, 2023 Environmental Board Meeting: August 30, 2023 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 13, 2023 Tentative City Council Work Session: October 2, 2023 Tentative City Council Meeting: October 9, 2023 BACKGROUND The applicant, Troy Johnson of ForeverLawn Minnesota Inc., submitted a Land Use Application on behalf of Jon Lipinski, 75 Robinson Drive, for a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to allow synthetic grass/artificial turf as an approved ground cover. 2 ANALYSIS Background On August 10, 2023 a crew performing landscaping work at 75 Robinson Drive had removed turf grass and soil and added rock in preparation for installation of synthetic grass that would cover a large portion of the lot. A stop work order was issued for the site at that time due to the violation of City Code requirements. Currently, the zoning ordinance requires sod or seed as ground cover. There is no exception for synthetic grass. City Code Section 1007.043(17): (h) Sod and Ground Cover. All areas not otherwise improved in compliance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of four (4) inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Exceptions to these criteria may be approved by the Zoning Administrator as follows: 1. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in any of the following cases: a. Where the seed is applied to future expansion areas as shown on the approved plans, or b. Where the seed is applied adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Seed mixture shall be approved by the City, or c. For single-family and two family residential properties, proper erosion control measures shall be implemented and maintained until vegetation is established. Sod may be required in areas subject to erosion as determined by the Building Official or City Engineer. 2. Undisturbed areas containing existing viable natural vegetation which can be maintained free of foreign and noxious plant materials. 3. Areas designated as open space or future expansion areas properly planted and maintained with native grasses or wild flowers indigenous to Minnesota. Seed mixture shall be approved by the City. 4. Use of mulch materials such as bark, wood chips, and decorative rock in support of shrubs and foundation plantings. 5. Natural Prairie Restoration Areas. Native grasses and wild flowers indigenous to Minnesota, planted and maintained on any occupied lot or parcel of land, setback a minimum of 20 feet from the front lot line and/or side lot line abutting a public street, as part of a garden or landscape treatment. 3 Environmental Board Due to the environmental concerns regarding the proposed use of synthetic grass as an alternative ground cover, the Environmental Board was presented the proposed text amendment for comment. Per the August 30, 2023 Environmental Board staff report: Potential benefits of synthetic turf: • No water required for irrigation • No pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers are needed • Less fuel emissions from lawn equipment • Product is made from plastic bottles and “technology created from soybean plants” Areas of concern: • Staff is not aware of any cities in the area that have amended their ordinances to allow for the widespread use this product. • Hazardous products are released if the product catches fire. • Permeability of synthetic turf may be an issue. Even if the product is 100% permeable, this doesn’t take into account the permeability of the underlying soil. • Evapotranspiration has a cooling effect. Water uptake by plants also contributes to stormwater management. • The product may contribute byproducts to surface and groundwater supplies as it decomposes. The polyurethane and polyurethane that it is made of has hazardous decomposition products. • Use in easement areas and rights-of-way should be prohibited. These areas require access for maintenance of utilities and management of stormwater systems and are frequently disturbed. • Examples of installations provided were for small portions of yards, not whole yards. • Expected life span of the product is 15-20 years. At that time, the material must be removed and landfilled. The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed text amendment at the August 30, 2023 meeting and provided the following comments: • Other alternative lawn types are available that are better choices for limiting water, pesticide, and fertilizer use • Hazardous byproducts leaching into ground and surface waters • Hazardous byproducts when product is exposed to fire • Soil health impacts • Losing the water uptake and cooling effect of evapotranspiration from plants • Impacts on resale value of homes 4 The Board voted 1 “no” for any use of the product and 3 “noes” for widespread use but may be allowed in certain limited, clearly defined small areas such as high traffic or erosion areas. City Engineer The attached City Engineer’s Memo provides the following comments: • Drainage and Infiltration Concerns-need more conclusive evidence. If product is going to allowed in small applications, treat it as an impervious surface. Residential lots are allowed up to 65% maximum impervious surface coverage. • Unknown potential environmental and health impacts. • Synthetic grass should not be allowed in drainage and utility easements due to potential restoration costs as a result of future City utility maintenance and replacement activities. 75 Robinson Drive The property owner states in the attached narrative letter some of the reasons for installing artificial turf/synthetic grass is that traditional turf grass lawns are biological deserts, reducing carbon footprint, water conservation, no fertilizers, low maintenance option, no noise or air pollution from lawn equipment etc. The property owner also noted difficulty in growing/maintaining sod or seed on the site. Staff notes these same outcomes can be achieved by installing Native Landscapes as allowed by State Statute 412.926. Synthetic grass does require the use of lawn equipment such as leaf blowers or sweepers. Synthetic grass creates more of a biological desert. The other properties along Robinson Drive have been able to grow/maintain sod or seed on their properties. It should be noted that a zoning ordinance amendment would apply to all properties in the City, not just 75 Robinson Drive. Other Communities Staff reached out to other communities to see if or how they deal with synthetic grass. The responses differed with some communities saying it would not be allowed at all and some would allow it in small applications. Several communities noted concerns regarding product permeability and runoff. Findings of Fact The zoning ordinance amendment submitted by the applicant to allow for the widespread use of synthetic grass does not meet findings of fact criteria for a zoning ordinance text amendment. 5 Per City Code Section 1007.015(4) (e) The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed action is not consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan goals of addressing water rate and quantity, water quality, or groundwater management. 2.The proposed action is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed action would not be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3.The proposed action conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed action does not conform with all performance standards. 4.The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. 5.Traffic generation by the proposed action is within capabilities of streets serving the property as described in City Code Section 1007.020(4)(d). Traffic generation is not applicable to the proposed action. RECOMMENDATION Staff does not support widespread use of synthetic grass and recommends denial of the applicant’s proposed ordinance amendment. If the Board supports limited use of synthetic grass, staff suggests the following: 1. Synthetic grass would only be allowed in side and rear yards, not in front yards. 2. Synthetic grass would not be allowed in drainage and utility easements. 3. Synthetic grass would be treated as an impervious surface and zoning district Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage regulations would apply. Question: If Board supports limited use, should there be standards for: 6 1. Color? 2.Pile height? a. Would synthetic carpet (low pile height) be acceptable? ATTACHMENTS 1.Applicant’s Narrative 2.Applicant’s Proposed Ordinance Amendment 3.ForeverLawn Landscape System Drawing 4.Environmental Coordinator Memo dated September 5, 2023 5.Engineer Memo dated September 6, 2023 I "1 L 1 ·1·1 :111 11 \ I 11111l , I,,. 111c 23255 Woodland Rel Lakeville MN 55044 612-246-3002 www.mn.forcvcrlawn.com To whom it may concern. I wanted lo address the concerns in the e111ail. I. Per111eabilily oflhc product. 2.Constrnclion specifications 3.Maintenance rcquirc111ents 4.Fire ratings 5.Im pacts 011 public utility easements and responsibility for damages associated with use of the easements 6. Drainage/grading concerns First I wanted to share some ol'lhe reasons my customer choose to invest in synthetic grass. This is from his email this morning. Our Reason for using eco-friendly aiiilicial turf: •Traditional turf grass lawns are biological deserts. •Reducing carbon footprint (water conservation (est. 55-gallons saved per SF per year), no fertilizers and chemicals, no noise or air pollution !i·om lawn equipment); •Health issues requiring the need for a low maintenance option. •Using I 00% recycled and renewable anti-microbial infill. •No crumb rubber infill, using an environmentally friendly anti-microbial infill. •Permeable and the sub-base porous rock acts as a better filtration system for groundwater, considering our issues with manganese in t_he Lino Lakes public well system. •Beautify our property and neighborhood. Lino Lakes Ordinance References: The City may allow flexibility in landscape standards if there w·e conflicts with solar power, wind power, waler hw·vesting, food production, or other innovative measures proposed for the site. I.Permeablity of the product. See attached permeability reports. Permeability or the turf itsel r is 30 inches to over 3000 inches for K9Grass. There is a test attached that includes permeabi li ty over a class v and 3/8 minus base that still drains 12 inches per hour. We use a¾" clew· base with 3/8" clear limestone. The idea here is to rcchw·ge the water tables buy allowing as much rain lo infiltrate back through the soils w1d reduce runoff. The results show less runoff that a natural grass system. 2.Construction Specifications. See attached specs on turf and CS! specs for ins talling. 3.Maintenance Requirements. Sec attached maintenw1ce recommendation s. We have more specific requirements for K9G rass. 4.Fire Ratings. See attached pill tlwrnnability tests. 5.lnpacls on public utility easements and responsibility for damages associated with use of the ease111ents. If homeowner installs in easement, homeowner is responsible lo pulling back or replacing turf. I have only seen 2 times on commercial properties where the turf had lo be pulled back in 18 yew·s. 6. Drainage/grading concerns. Installing synthetic grass does not lix drainage issues, these issues need lo be addressed before i nstalling synthetic grass. The grading is the saJ11e as it was before, we just remove the grass (i r any remaining) to a depth of 4 inches to allow for the installation or our dynamic drainage base. This allows the water to percolate into the natural soils and back lo the waler table. As the waler fillers through the stone it cleans the water much like a septic system filtration bed docs. I have addressed the swne concerns with other cities, such as Minneapolis, Orono and others. To my knowledge alkr reviewing 1he permeability tests, it was enough lo allow ii. In my opinion, lhe low percentage of customers installing synlhetic grass die! not warrant a change in ordinances al the 1i111e. Attachment 1: Applicant's Narrative Attachment 2: Applicant's Proposed Ordinance Drawing Attachment 3: ForeverLawn Landscape System Drawing Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: 9/05/23 Re: Environmental Comments/9-05-23/Synthetic Grass The Environmental Board had the following comments at the 8-30-23 EB meeting: Votes: One “no” for any use of the product. Three “noes” for widespread use, may be allowable in certain limited, clearly defined areas. Overall, the Board had concerns related to: •Other alternative lawn types are available that are better choices for limiting water, pesticide, and fertilizer use •Hazardous byproducts leaching into ground and surface waters •Hazardous byproducts when product is exposed to fire •Soil health impacts •Losing the water uptake and cooling effect of evapotranspiration from plants •Impacts on resale value of homes Environmental staff does not support use of this product. Environmental Memo Attachment 4: Environmental Coordinator Memo dated September 5, 2023 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller, WSB Engineering Date: September 6, 2023 Re: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment for Synthetic Grass – Engineering Review WSB reviewed the submitted information pertaining to the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZOTA) for Synthetic Grass in Lino Lakes, MN, as submitted by ForeverLawn. We have the following comments and recommendations. We recommend that synthetic grass be treated as impervious surface until more conclusive evidence can be provided as to the consistent infiltration rates that can be achieved over various installations and maintained over an extended period of time. It could therefore be installed up to established limits for impervious surfaces on lots. We have reservations as to the unknown potential environmental and health impacts regarding biproducts from the materials leaching into the underlying soils and water runoff. We recommend that synthetic grass be used more sparingly such as in smaller high traffic areas where traditional turf may be excessively worn and eroded to a point of being bare. We recommend that synthetic grass be kept out of drainage and utility easements due to the potential restoration costs as a result of future City utility maintenance and replacement activities. We recommend with future pervious submittal considerations, that they should include; o Calculations and testing for the proposed infiltration rates that are signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State o Details on the impact on infiltration due to the variability of installation methods o Details on the impact on infiltration due to clogging over time and the required maintenance. o Details on the water and soil quality with extended exposure to the synthetic grass materials If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Attachment 5: Engineer Memo dated September 6, 2023 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: September 13, 2023 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Outdoor Storage at 2300 Main Street (Glamos Wire, Inc.) CASE NUMBER: CU2023-004 APPLICANT: Steve Tomas Tomas Companies/Glamos Wire, Inc. 2300 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 OWNER: Same REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: August 21, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline: October 20, 2023 120-Day Review Deadline: December 19, 2023 Environmental Board Meeting: August 30, 2023 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 13, 2023 Tentative City Council Work Session: October 2, 2023 Tentative City Council Meeting: October 9, 2023 BACKGROUND The applicant, Steve Tomas of Tomas Companies/Glamos Wire, Inc., submitted a Land Use Application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment for Outdoor Storage at their facility located at 2300 Main Street. This staff report is based on the following information: • Narrative prepared by Bolton & Menk dated August 14, 2023 • Certificate of Survey prepared by Bolton & Menk dated July 25, 2023 2 • Site Development Plans for Tomas Companies prepared by Bolton & Menk revision dated August 14, 2023 • ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated July 2, 2020 • Impervious Areas Exhibit prepared by Bolton & Menk dated August 2023 • Stormwater Drainage Report, Drainage Maps & Modeling prepared by Bolton & Menk dated August 1, 2023 • Geotechnical Report prepared by Braun Intertec Corporation dated March 29, 1996 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Bolton & Menk dated April 25, 2023 ANALYSIS Background In July 2020, staff observed illegal outdoor storage of semi-trailers, signage, and construction without a permit at 2300 Main Street, Glamos Wire, Inc. Staff reached out to the property owner in August 2020 with a courtesy call and email. After no response, staff followed up with letters and emails in September, October and November 2020. In December 2020 and March 2021, the applicant submitted incomplete land use applications. Staff continued to work with the property owner until a complete land use application was submitted in May 2021. In July 2021, Council passed Resolution No. 21- 69 approving a conditional use permit for open and outdoor storage for Glamos Wire, Inc. (2300 Main St). In October 2022, the owner disturbed/graded land and filled in a stormwater basin south of the outdoor storage area without permit and began storing items outside, a violation of the approved conditional use permit and city ordinance. In November 2022, staff met with owner and explained the conditional use permit needs to be amended and a formal land use application is required. In August 2023, the land use application was received. Zoning The property is zoned LI, Light Industrial. Outdoor storage (previously called open and outdoor storage) is allowed with an approved conditional use permit. Conditions of the outdoor storage use are detailed below. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North GB, General Business Commercial (McDonald’s & Main Street Shoppes) Commercial South LI, Light Industrial Vacant Industrial Industrial 3 East LI, Light Industrial Industrial (Laborers Training Center) Industrial West GB, General Business Vacant Commercial Commercial This I-35E, Main Street and Otter Lake Road corridor has been the focus of high value, high quality commercial and industrial development for both the City and property owners. The City should be cognizant of outdoor storage and its limited increase in land value. Site Plan The parcel is approximately 18 acres. The main building and associated parking lots are located on the north half of the site. The south half of the site consists of trees, wetlands and agricultural crop land. The applicant’s site plan shows a new 2.06 acre outdoor storage area just south of the existing outdoor storage area. The new area would be connected to the existing area by two existing gates on the east half of the south border of the existing storage area. There is a new vehicle access gate on the west side of the storage between the existing and proposed storage areas. The proposed storage area would be enclosed by a 6 ft. tall chain linked fence and be paved with asphalt. The project would also entail grading, curb and gutter, connection to existing storm sewer, lighting, landscaping, and stormwater management/treatment. Screening requirements and building footprint to outdoor storage area ratio limits are not met as detailed below. Lighting The plans show three (3) light fixtures for the new storage area: placed on the west, north, and east sides of the storage area. These fixtures will have a thirty (30) ft. mounting height, be LED, and be downwards facing. The photometric plan shall be revised to clearly show foot candle measurements along the west, south and east lot lines. Off-Street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements were analyzed and met with the original CUP. Additional off-street parking is not required for the proposed outdoor storage area. Grading Plan and Stormwater Management The stormwater management for the outdoor storage expansion consists of an existing rain garden and proposed sedimentation basin. Based on the provided HydroCAD 4 modeling and water quality calculations in the stormwater report, this project meets City requirements for rate control and water quality treatment. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 18.98 30.11 58.70 Not provided Proposed 17.22 26.86 51.29 Not provided Public Utilities Public utilities exist along CR 84 (Otter Lake Road). Water and sanitary sewer are not impacted by the outdoor storage area. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards A tree survey was performed that identified: Of the 210 trees surveyed, 92 will be removed. 61 of these trees are in the Basic Use Area (within the outdoor storage area or within 20 feet of it). 31 of the tree removals that are located near the proposed stormwater basin will require mitigation trees to be planted. 32 mitigation trees are required because one of the trees is large enough to require two trees planted in its place. There are 18 trees that will be preserved near the disturbance area. These trees will provide 43 trees worth of existing tree credit. There are numerous ash trees on the site that have been infested with Emerald ash borer. The following emerald ash borer infested trees must be removed: • 11 trees along Otter Lake Road east of the sidewalk. • Trees 208-215 in the northeast corner of the property. These trees have the potential to impact public safety and cause off-site property damage. All other ash trees on the site that have not been treated to prevent emerald ash borer infestation should be removed as well, but their removal will not be a requirement of this project. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have been met. Total Trees Surveyed 210 Total Trees Removed 92 Trees Removed in Basic Use Area 61 Mitigation Trees Required 32 5 Open Areas Landscape Standards Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. Required for 32,000 square feet of open space: 13 large trees 26 large shrubs Provided: 75 large trees 0 large shrubs Existing trees that will be preserved southwest of the proposed storage area provide 43 trees worth of credit. There are also 32 new trees planned for the open space area. 75 total large trees were provided. One large tree can be substituted for 2 large shrubs. There are enough large trees provided to also meet the large shrub requirement. Open Areas Landscape Standards have been met. Buffer and Screen Standards Outdoor storage yards require a 10 foot high screen, though the City Council may approve a modification or waiver from these standards if the affected lot line adjoins another industrial property. The current plan set includes inconsistent information about the height and materials for the proposed fence. The fence plan submitted should be consistent across all plan sheets. The west perimeter of the storage area abuts Otter Lake Road and will require a 10 foot opaque fence (ex: vinyl) with shrub cover for 50 percent of the wall. The shrub cover required for the west section of fence has not been provided. Additionally, trees are required along the length of the screen at intervals determined by size (large trees every 50 linear feet, medium trees every 35 linear feet, or small trees every 25 linear feet). Between the existing trees that will be preserved and the new trees planned for the west perimeter, the tree requirement for the west fence perimeter is met. The south and east perimeters of the storage area abut industrial properties. For these perimeters, staff is recommending 8 foot high vinyl fencing to match the existing fence on the storage area to the north. Trees planted along the south perimeter will meet tree and shrub requirements for the south perimeter fence. The east perimeter fence should not require additional shrubs or trees due to screening provided by the berm that abuts the property line. Buffer and screen requirements have not been met. 6 Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards do not apply to permitted outdoor storage areas in Industrial Districts. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. All disturbed areas outside of the paved areas will receive 6” of topsoil and be seeded with MN DOT seed mix 35-241, a mesic prairie seed mix. The unpermitted grading that created the berm running along the south and east perimeters of the proposed storage area would have resulted in exposed soil. Exposed soil is prone to colonization by invasive, weedy plant species. A vegetation management plan will be required for the berm and any additional exposed soil around it that will not be paved for the storage area. This must include a vegetation assessment that identifies the plant species present. Depending on the results of the assessment, a plan to prepare the site for native seeding may also be required. Signage New signage is not proposed. A separate Sign Permit Application with detailed sign information would be required for any permanent or temporary signage. Impervious Surface Coverage The allowed maximum impervious surface coverage per lot in the LI, Light Industrial District is 75%. Per the Impervious Areas Exhibit, the site will have 56% impervious surface and is compliant. Traffic Study CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) is a Minor Arterial road. A traffic study is not required for the outdoor storage area. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Considerations The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR identified this site as industrial in the land use scenarios. The outdoor storage project is consistent with industrial development. No further environmental assessment is required. 7 Wetlands A 0.81 acre area of wetland was delineated within the parcel boundaries. This shallow marsh and seasonally flooded fringe are located on the southeast corner of the parcel. Two additional wetlands just south of the proposed outdoor storage area were deemed incidental by Rice Creek Watershed District in 2007. Impacts to these wetlands will not require mitigation. No additional wetland impacts that would require mitigation are proposed for this project. Sheet C3.01, Grading and Drainage Plan, shows a Wetland Buffer Line. The City of Lino Lakes and RCWD shall be listed as benefactors to any wetland declarations or easements. Shoreland District The site is not located in the Shoreland District. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department was not requested to review the outdoor storage application. Public Safety Comments Fire Division Deputy Director L’Allier did not have any issues with the proposed outdoor storage area. Lino Lakes Public Safety Department-Police Division did not express any concerns with the proposed outdoor storage area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their August 30, 2023 meeting and supported the project with some with minor revisions as summarized in the attached September 5, 2023 Environmental Coordinator memo. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement 8 The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Site Improvement Performance Agreement A Site Improvement Performance Agreement and securities are required. Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage City Code Section 1007.120(9) details the following conditions of approval for outdoor storage: (e) Outdoor storage (not outdoor sales lots) as an accessory use provided that: 1. The designated storage area shall comply with all building setback requirements for the district. Outdoor storage is prohibited between the principal structure and any public right-of-way. The required building setback along CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) is 50 feet. The proposed outdoor storage and fence setback is 160 ft. This requirement is met. The required building setback along the rear lot line is 15 feet. The proposed outdoor storage and fence setback is 250 ft. This requirement is met. The required building setback along the side lot line is 10 feet. The proposed outdoor storage and fence is 18 ft. This requirement is met. No outdoor storage area is proposed between the principal structure and the public right-of-way. 2. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of adjacent uses and public rights-of-way via a fence and greenbelt planting strip, in compliance with City Code Section 1007.043(17)(f). City Code Section 1007.043(17)(f) Buffer and Screen Standards for outdoor storage yards requires a 10 foot screen height and a wall or fence of permanent materials and plantings shall provide shrub cover for 50 percent of the wall or fence on the exterior side. Additionally, at its discretion, the City Council may approve a modification or waiver from these standards where the affected lot line adjoins another industrial property. Sheet C1.01, Site Plan states “Proposed Chain Linked (Match Existing)”and details a 6 ft tall chain link fence. The existing fence is an 8ft tall opaque white vinyl privacy fence, not a 6ft chain link. Screening requirements along CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) are not met. Plans shall be revised to provide 10ft tall opaque white vinyl privacy fence similar to existing and include landscaping per ordinance. 9 The south and east lot lines adjoin other industrial properties. Staff recommends an 8ft tall opaque white vinyl privacy fence to match existing be installed along the south and east perimeters of the outdoor storage area. The existing 8ft tall fence along the south side of the existing outdoor storage could be relocated further south to save costs. Staff would support waiving the additional planting requirements. 3. The entire storage area is fenced and secured in an appropriate manner. The proposed storage area is fenced and secured by a 6 ft tall fence; however, the plans shall be revised per comments detailed in this staff report. 4. The storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced. The proposed outdoor storage area will be paved with asphalt. 5. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this ordinance and is not located in the front yard. The proposed outdoor storage area does not impact off-street parking requirements. 6. The property shall not abut I-35W or I-35E. The property does not abut I-35W or I-35E. 7. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 1:1. The building footprint is 3.22 acres; therefore, a maximum 3.22 acres of storage area is allowed. The current outdoor storage area is 1.29 acres and the proposed outdoor storage area is 2.06 acres. This would bring the total outdoor storage area for the site to 3.35 acres, which is larger than what is currently allowed. The plans, narrative, drainage calculations, etc. shall be revised. 8. All parking, loading and truck staging activities shall occur on site. On- street parking and loading associated with the use is prohibited. No on-street parking or loading is proposed. 9. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. No additional comment. 10 10. The outdoor storage items or materials shall be directly related to the principal industrial user. No off-site user storage shall be allowed. No additional comment. Findings of Fact-Conditional Use Permit The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: 1. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: a. Land Use Plan. b. Transportation Plan. c. Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans. d. Local Water Management Plan. e. Capital Improvement Plan. f. Policy Plan. g. Natural Environment Plan. The outdoor storage area is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The property is guided industrial and outdoor storage as an accessory to the industrial user is consistent with that land use. The development is also consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to resource management, transportation, utilities and local water management plan. 2. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Present and future land uses in the area include commercial and industrial. The outdoor storage area is compatible with these uses if proper screening and compliance with the conditional use permit and City ordinances is maintained. 3. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. The outdoor storage area will conform to performance standards with site plan revisions as detailed in this staff report. 11 4. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: a. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. b. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange. h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Traffic generated by Glamos Wire, Inc. and the outdoor storage area are within capabilities of the streets serving the property. CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) and CSAH 14 (Main Street) are arterial and A-Minor Connector roads respectively. 5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. The principal building, Glamos Wire, Inc. has an adequate water supply. The outdoor storage area does not impact the water supply. 12 6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. The principal building, Glamos Wire, Inc. has an adequate sanitary sewer system. The outdoor storage area does not impact the sanitary sewer system. 7. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. No City funds are being expended on this project. 8. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. The outdoor storage of materials that cause excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors is not allowed. 9. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. There are no natural, scenic or historic features on the existing site. Planning& Zoning Board Input Staff requests input from the Planning & Zoning Board on the following items: 1. Does the Board support the 8ft tall privacy fence along the south and east lot lines vs a 10ft tall privacy fence? 2. Does the Board support waiving the landscaping/shrub planting requirements along the south and east lot lines? RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit amendment for outdoor storage for Glamos Wire, Inc. located at 2300 Main Street subject to the following conditions: 1. The outdoor storage of any semi-trailers, vehicles, equipment, materials etc. shall be accessory to the principal use. No off-site user storage shall be allowed. 2. The fence and/or outdoor storage items shall not impede or impair the function of the drainage or stormwater management system. 3. The only items and equipment allowed in the outdoor storage area are as follows: a. Semi-trailers, utility trailers, and company vehicles b. Wire stems 13 c. Steel scrap bin d. Bales of cardboard e. Overflow pallets f. Snow plow and sanding equipment g. One (1) eight (8) yard trash bin 4. All outdoor storage shall be located within the approved outdoor storage area. No items or equipment shall be stored on the grass or landscaped area. 5. No outside storage shall be located between the principal structure and any public right-of-way. 6. No outdoor storage shall occur within 10 ft. of the east lot line within the outdoor storage area. 7. The landscape planting requirement along the south fence and east fence is waived; however, the existing trees and landscaping shall not be removed or they shall be replaced to provide sufficient screening in accordance with City Code. 8. A Site Performance Agreement and securities are required. 9. A building permit for the fence installation is required. 10. Failure to comply with any of the above listed conditions may result in revocation of the conditional use permit. The following items shall be addressed prior to City Council consideration: 1. All plan sheets and submittals shall show a solid line for the Property Line. The property line does not extend into the CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) street right-of- way easement. 2. All plan sheets and submittals shall reference the correct lot area. 3. All plan sheets and submittals shall be revised to show a compliant ratio of storage area to building footprint not exceeding 1:1. 4. A revised cost estimate shall be submitted. 5. Certificate of Survey: a. The lot line shall extend only to the CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) street right- of-way easement. b. The lot area shall not include the CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) street right-of- way easement. i. Include on the survey: Boundary Area – ROW Area = Lot Area. c. All lot areas referenced throughout all plan sets and supporting documents (e.g. stormwater management plan) shall be based and calculated on the correct lot area. 6. Site Development Plans for Tomas Companies: 14 a. All plan sheets shall show a solid line for the Property Line. The property line does not extend into the CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) street right-of-way easement. b. Sheet C1.01, Site Plan: i. Setback measurements shall be provided from the property lines to the fences. ii. Hydrants, utility mains, and symbols shall be shown and labeled. iii. Ten (10) ft tall opaque white vinyl privacy fence matching existing and landscaping/shrubs shall be provided along west side of the outdoor storage area. iv. Eight (8) ft tall opaque white vinyl privacy fence matching existing shall be provided along south and east side of the outdoor storage area. v. Plan sheet callouts shall correctly note 10ft and 8ft fences and not mention chain link fence. vi. Permanent fences shall be offset by a minimum two (2) ft at intervals of 75 ft maximum length. This shall be clearly shown on the site plan. vii. What is the purpose of Vehicle Access Gate shown on the west side that leads into the drainage swale? viii. The area acre calculations shown on the Impervious Surface Exhibit shall also be included on this plan sheet. c. Sheet L2.02, Fence Details: i. Plan sheet shall correctly show required eight (8) and ten (10) ft opaque white vinyl privacy fence. ii. The Section of Screening notes an existing 10’ vinyl fence but an 8’ vinyl fence was approved in June 2022. Please confirm height and revise plan sheet accordingly. iii. The Section of Screening notes Proposed 10’ chain link fence. Plan shall be revised accordingly. iv. Are the trees shown on the Section of Screening actual tree locations? v. A gate detail shall be provided. d. Electrical Photometric Plan: i. The west property lot line shall be clearly shown (not including the street right-of-way). ii. Foot candle measurements shall be shown extending beyond the west, south, and east lot lines. 15 e. Wetland Buffer: i.A separate plan sheet shall be included showing the wetland buffer, area square footage, monument sign locations, and City detail for the monument sign. ii.The City of Lino Lakes and RCWD shall be listed as benefactors to any wetland declarations or easements. 7. Impervious Areas Exhibit: a.Show actual impervious surface calculations and percentages. ATTACHMENTS 1.Site Location and Aerial Map 2.Applicant Narrative 3.Certificate of Survey 4.Site Development Plans 5. Impervious Area Exhibit 6. City Engineer Memo dated August 30, 2023 7. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated September 5, 2023 14 70th St 84 Legend Address Labels Parcels August 30, 2023 Map Powered By Datafi ± 1 in = 250 Ft 2300 Main St-Glamos WireAttachment 1: Site Location and Aerial Map H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx August 14, 2023 M. Grochala, Community Development Director; and K. Larsen, City Planner City of Lino Lakes, MN 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Tomas Companies, Inc./Glamos Wire, Inc. Open and Outdoor Storage Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review 2300 Main St., Lino Lakes, MN 55038 BMI Project No.: 0T7129812 Dear Mr. Grochala and Ms. Larsen: Tomas Companies/Glamos Wire has applied to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for an after- the-fact permit (#22-097) to establish an outdoor storage space at their factory site in Lino Lakes. Figure 1 shows the project parcel in Lino Lakes at the southeast corner of Main Street and Otter Lake Road. Glamos Wire, now, is applying to the City of Lino Lakes to amend their existing Conditional Use Permit approved by the City Council on July 12, 2021 (Res. No. 21-69) and to review the Site Plan for their proposed outdoor storage area expansion. The proposal expands Glamos Wire’s outdoor storage area, as shown in the attached plans. In 2021, Glamos Wire was approved for a conditional use permit to develop the land south of the primary structure with areas for truck maneuvering, and open and outdoor storage. Since those approvals, grading work was done to level a soil stockpile to construct a supplemental outdoor storage area for pallets of products (wire stems for tomato plants). This soil stockpile, shown in Figure 2, existed on the site since the construction of the original building on the parcel. This supplemental storage area is currently unpaved and incompliant with the standards of the City Code and the rules of the RCWD. The proposed project seeks to bring the property and uses incompliance with all City and RCWD standards while also addressing the present and future growth of the business and its storage needs for products. This project includes grading, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, connection to existing storm sewer, lighting, landscaping, and stormwater management/treatment. City land use requirements for outdoor storage areas call for pavement, curb and gutter, lights, fencing and associated features. These requirements are met, as demonstrated in the attachments to this application. As designed, the proposed expansion of the outdoor storage area meets the standards outlined in the Code of the City of Lino Lakes, § 1007.121 of: GI, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; (9) Conditional Use: Attachment 2: Applicant Narrative Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 2 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx (h) Outdoor storage (not outdoor sales lots) as an accessory use provided that: 1. The designated storage area shall comply with all building setback requirements for the district. Outdoor storage is prohibited between the principal structure and any public right of-way. 2. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of adjacent uses and public rights-of-way via a fence and greenbelt planting strip, in compliance with City Code Section 1007.043(17)(f). 3. The entire storage area is fenced and secured in an appropriate manner. 4. The storage area is blacktopped, concrete surfaced, or class 5 gravel unless an alternative wear-resistant material is determined by the City Engineer to be suitable to control dust and drainage and is specifically approved by the City Council. 5. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this ordinance and is not located in the front yard. 6. The property shall not abut I-35W or I-35E. 7. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 1:1. 8. All parking, loading and truck staging activities shall occur on site. On-street parking and loading associated with the use is prohibited. 9. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. 10. The outdoor storage items or materials shall be directly related to the principal industrial user. No off-site user storage shall be allowed. Additionally, the only items Glamos Wire seeks to store in this expanded area are those previously approved for the existing storage area’s CUP in 2021; these include: 1. Semi-trailers, utility trailers and company vehicles 2. Wire stems for tomato plants (the company’s primary product) 3. Steel scrap bin 4. Bales of cardboard 5. Overflow pallets 6. Snow plow and sanding equipment 7. Eight (8) yard trash bins Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 3 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx Figure 1. Project Parcel. Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 4 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx Figure 2. Showing Parcel and LiDAR Contours of Soil Stockpile Before Leveling for Outdoor Storage Area Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 5 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx Existing Conditions In 2007, RCWD Permit #07-066 was issued for the expansion of an existing parking area and the addition of two rain gardens. The two rain gardens were built to treat the 0.34” rain event over new impervious area, which worked in concert with a shallow “dry” impoundment to treat stormwater quality and rate on site. Grading work was done in recent years to level the soil stockpile, and a gravel surface outdoor storage area was constructed for storing pallets of product (wire stems for tomato plants). The eastern rain garden was filled when the stockpile was leveled. A 0.8-acre area in the southeast corner of the site has been delineated as a Type 1/3 Wetland and details on the methods and results of the delineation can be found in the Wetland Delineation Report. The WCA Boundary Decision #23-083R was issued on 6-1-2023 (attached). Proposed Conditions City land use requirements for outdoor storage areas call for pavement, curb and gutter, lights, fencing and associated features. The current proposal expands the outdoor storage area as shown in the attached plans. This project includes grading, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, connection to existing storm sewer, lighting, landscaping, and stormwater management and treatment. The proposed storage area will expand the existing impervious footprint and include stormwater treatment for the new impervious area. The treatment capacity of the rain garden that was filled in is included in the required treatment volume. The detention provided by the existing shallow “dry” impoundment will also be replaced in the new stormwater pond. See attached Existing and Proposed Drainage Figures for drainage patterns of the existing and proposed site. Floodplain As shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 370 of 450 (Map number 27003C0370E Effective date December 16, 2015), there are no mapped FEMA flood zones within the Tomas Company Parcel. In addition, as shown on the Rice Creek Watershed District viewer there are no RCWD mapped floodplains (2022) within the Tomas Company parcel. Impervious Surface Calculations The full buildout of the 17.93-acre site, as shown in the Anoka County Parcel Viewer ( ID #24-31-22-14- 0002) for the parcel outside of the existing roadway easements on Otter Lake Road and Main Street, must not exceed 14.5 acres of impervious to conform with the regional pond design assumptions of a commercial/industrial site with hydrologic curve number of 91. This curve number has a corresponding impervious percentage of 81%. Existing conditions and proposed conditions include 8.5 acres and 10.8 acres of impervious surfaces, respectively, leaving up to 3.7 acres of impervious surface remaining for future expansion to the full build impervious design. Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 6 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx Preliminary Estimate of Probable Cost Table 1 is a preliminary estimate of quantities and opinion of probable cost. Table 1 ESTIMATE FINAL BASE BID 1 - MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 - CURB AND GUTTER LF 1115 35.00$ 39,025.00$ 3 -TURF ESTABLISHMENT LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4 - CLASS V AGGREGATE CY 2715 35.00$ 95,025.00$ 5 - BITUMINOUS TON 2249 100.00$ 224,900.00$ 6 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 7 - LANDSCAPING LS 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 8 - REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 9 - COMMON EXCAVATION CY 255 8.00$ 2,040.00$ 10 - CLASS III RIP RAP CY 95 100.00$ 9,500.00$ 11 - TOP SOIL CY 50 100.00$ 5,000.00$ 12 - FENCE 6' CHAIN LINK LF 880 55.00$ 48,400.00$ 13 - LIGHTING LS 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 14 84" OCS STRUCTURE EA 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 15 18" RCP LF 144 80.00$ 11,520.00$ SUBT OT AL 508,410.00$ PRELIMINARY ST AT EMENT OF EST IMAT ED QUANT IT IES UNIT PRICE COST NO. NOTES ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Application Narrative Date: 8/14/2023 Page: 7 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\5_Permits\City\3_Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Stormwater Narrative_City of Lino Lakes.docx If you have any questions, feel free to call or email me at (612) 834-2909 or Brent.Johnson@bolton- menk.com Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brent Johnson, PE Water Resources Project Manager Attachments: - Tomas Companies Outdoor Storage Plan Set - Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Application and Attachments - Certificate of Survey and copy of ALTA - Existing and Proposed Drainage Figures - Existing and Proposed HydroCAD Modeling Results for 24-Hour 2-, 10-, and 100-Year Storm Events - 2023 Wetland Boundary Notice of Decision - 1996 Soil Borings - 1998 Otter Lake Road Improvements Project Drainage Computations (Applicable Sections) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X OTTER LAKE ROAD CLVT CLVT CLVTS 00°06'05" E 1269.15 S 88°22'05" W 645.68N 00°52'47" W 1275.33N 88°55'54" E 662.87S160.1 159.6 79.9 39.9 39.9 79.9 240.3439.639.478.2163.718.919.0119.1>>>>>>>>D50.0'MAIN ST.90991 0 9 1 5 9 1 4 91 3 91 191291391 4 910 915916914913910915 920920 915914913912911 915915916 916915 914ll l l l l l l l 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BUILDING 1 - SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MN 55128 (651) 704-9970 R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 H:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\CAD\C3D\129812_V_BASE_E1.dwg 7/25/2023 5:21 PM ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reserved JOB NUMBER:FIELD BOOK:DRAWN BY: FOR: R CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 2300 MAIN STREET, LINO LAKES, MN PART OF: W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 SEC. 24, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MN TOMAS COMPANIES, INC. ARK LOT AREA: 832,279 SQ. FT. ALL BOUNDARIES AND AREA ARE ACCORDING TO THE E.G. RUD & SONS INC. ALTA SURVEY (DOCUMENT 4) PROPERTY INFORMATION AS SHOWN BASED ON ALTA SURVEY PREPARED BY E.G. RUD AND SONS, INC. DATED 7/02/2020. STREET FRONTAGE: 1269.15 FEET, BASED ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY DATUMS: VERTICAL - NAVD88 HORIZONTAL - AMOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM BENCHMARK: MNDOT MONUMENT GSID STATION NO. 92399 "0282 S" ELEVATION = 931.46 NAVD88 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM E.G. RUD AND SONS INC. ALTA SURVEY (DOCUMENT 4): "That part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, lying East of a line described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said West half of Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter; thence Northerly to a point on the North line of said West Half of Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter distant 20 feet West from the Northeast corner of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and there terminating, Except Parcel 10, Anoka County Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 65, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of Anoka County Recorder. NOTES:SOUTH LINE OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 24STREET UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1308846 NORTH LINE OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 24E LINE OF THE W 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 24 EDGE OF WATER (LOCATED: 4/22/23) DELINEATED WETLAND BOUNDARY BUILDING CORNER LIES 1.3' (PER ALTA SURVEY BY RUD) BUILDING LINEAR FOOTAGE AND LOCATION BASED ON E.G. RUD & SONS INC. ALTA (DOCUMENT 4) WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 24 TRAIL, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1976889.002 8.0 55.0 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________ Date _______________________________ Ron P. Alwin License Number 17765 7/25/2023 VINYL FENCE MINOR CONTOURS MAJOR CONTOURS STORM SEWER>> l WATER SYSTEM X X FENCE Attachment 3: Certificate of Survey XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXOTTER LAKE ROADCLVTELEV=911.10CLVTELEV=911.65CLVTELEV=910.60CBR=913.05I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.44I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.34I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.38I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.12I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.08I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=913.88I=I=I=I=I=I=SMH SSWRR=916.84I=I=I=I=I=I=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DMAIN ST.909 910915914913911912913914910915916914913910915920920 915914913912911 915 915916916915914llllllllllllllllll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XXXXXXXREMOVE STORMCULVERTREMOVE STORMSEWERREMOVE STORMCULVERTREMOVE STORMSEWERREMOVE STORMSTRUCTUREPROTECT STORM STRUCTURE.REFER TO SHEET C3.01 FORTREATMENTPROTECT STORM SEWERPROTECT EXISTING FENCERSHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812C001.dwg 8/14/2023 12:36:18 PM DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDCLIENT PROJ. NO.ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTAOUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION0T7.129812DATELIC. NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPAREDBY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.BRENT H. JOHNSON 2037808/14/2023MJIMAMBHJC0.01REMOVALS PLANFEETSCALE050100HORZ.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXLEGENDUNDERGROUND UTILITY REMOVALSSAWCUTMASS TREE AND SHRUB REMOVALSPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET G0.01, TITLE SHEET, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES (CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING, ROADWAYS, ETC.)WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS AND VEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.4. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED ORANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE CHARACTERISTICS.5. THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TO LOCATE ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.6. MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, AND SIMILAR. DO NOT REMOVEEXISTING STORM SEWER UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR,MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.NOTESRAttachment 4: Site Development Plans XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXOTTER LAKE ROADS160.1159.679.939.939.979.9240.3439.639.478.2163.718.919.0119.150.0'MAIN ST.10C4.016C4.01CURB CUTCURB CUT7C4.017C4.01PROPOSED CHAIN LINKED (MATCH EXISTING)CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGSDEMONSTRATING PROPOSED FENCE MATCHES EXISTINGPROPOSED CHAIN LINKED (MATCH EXISTING)CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGSDEMONSTRATING PROPOSED FENCE MATCHES EXISTINGVEHICLE ACCESSGATEAPPROXIMATELOCATION OF EXISTING GATE9C4.019C4.016C4.016C4.018C4.0110C4.01STORMWATER PONDGATEAPPROXIMATELOCATION OF EXISTING GATE10' SIDE SETBACK10' REAR SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACKEXISTING PONDEXISTING BUILDINGEXISTING WETLANDEXISTING PARKING LOTRSHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812C101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:36:28 PM DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDCLIENT PROJ. NO.ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTAOUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION0T7.129812DATELIC. NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPAREDBY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.BRENT H. JOHNSON 2037808/14/2023MJIMAMBHJC1.01SITE PLANFEETSCALE050100HORZ.6'VLF1C4.01LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENTPROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACEPROPOSED CHAIN LINKED FENCINGFENCING KEY NOTE - 6' HEIGHT FENCEPROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET G0.01, TITLE SHEET, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.3. INSTALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES BEHIND BACK OF CURB.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BESEEDED. ALL AREAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A SPECIFIC SEED MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIX35-241.5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM, AND STRAIGHT JOINT BETWEEN NEW SODAND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTINGTURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, ATNO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.NOTES225.48'425.34'10C4.016'VLF10C4.016'VLFR XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXCLVTELEV=911.10CLVTELEV=911.65CLVTELEV=910.60CBR=913.05I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.44I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.34I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.38I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.12I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.08I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=913.88I=I=I=I=I=I=S>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D909 910915914913911912913914910915916914913910915920920 915914913912911 915 915916916915914llllllllllllllllll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CONCRETE WASHOUT2C4.011C4.01SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFIPIP4C4.01SFSFSFSF915 913914 915 915914916 910908908909 909IPIPSFTEMPORARYBIOLOG (TYP.)4C4.01SFSFSFSFRSHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812C201.dwg 8/14/2023 12:36:42 PM DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDCLIENT PROJ. NO.ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTAOUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION0T7.129812DATELIC. NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPAREDBY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.BRENT H. JOHNSON 2037808/14/2023MJIMAMBHJSEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLANFEETSCALE050100HORZ.IP1C4.01912910>>>>SFSFREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTUREINLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETPROPOSED SILT FENCEPROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGPROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKETPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET G0.01, TITLE SHEET, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE, SHEET C202, FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.3. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTIONRELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.4. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCAL REGULATIONS.5. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT IN DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENTATION, CLEAN OUT DOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AND OTHER CONVEYANCE DEVICES ASNECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED RESTORATION.6. INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, PROVIDE A PRODUCT FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST OF APPROVED PRODUCTS (a-h):a) ROAD DRAIN "TOP SLAB", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO b) ROAD DRAIN "CURB & GUTTER", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO c) INFRASAFE "SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTALSYSTEMS, INC. d) INFRASAFE "DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. e) INFRASAFE "CULVERT INLET PROTECTOR", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTALSYSTEMS, INC. f) DANDY SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC. g) DANDY CURB SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC. h) OR APPROVED EQUAL.7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DELINEATE TURF AND VEGETATED AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITH ORANGE SNOW FENCE. DO NOT ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT, OR MATERIALS TO UTILIZE, ACCESS, OROTHERWISE ENTER THE DELINEATED AREAS. MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND DISRUPTION OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO COMPLY WITH THE MN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT.NOTESC2.011C4.013C4.012C4.014C4.01RLEGEND >>>>912.34913.10912.55911.65911.48912.50912.63911.41912.68912.31913.47913.00913.56915.18915.03914.97914.09915.05913.33913.96915.27914.76914.87915.62915.15915.95918.329 1 8 . 6 8 9 1 7 . 6 8916.88917.049 1 7 . 0 4916.69916.65916.25926.17916.34916.43922.08915.75921.98914.47920.40920.23920.71 919.30919.39 920.44 921.87921.30 919.84918.07918.02918.48917.59916.73914.36913.95915.32914.55915.95915.79915.18913.73914.42914.10913.97913.47913.91913.93912.79912.27 911.26911.11910.90911.04 910.78911.31911.62910.24909.59909.57909.92909.83910.39910.24911.15912.44912.91913.73912.17 912.01912.90913.57914. 2 0914.28914.539 1 4 . 9 1915.19915.42914.74914.76915.20915.02914.889 1 5 . 1 0915.36915.439 1 4 . 9 7914.98915.05915.47915.15914.74915.84915.34914.07913.51913.22912.96912.96913.48918.70919.92920.95921.42921.25920.61920.64914 . 8 2912.31912.74912.52912.72913.16912.62911.77911.77911.93913.18913.14913.09912.40912.57912.83911.59911.60911.86912.27 912.67912.84913.05913.23913.21914.02911.84911.40911.37911.03910.64911.20 911.21910.46 909.93 909.79909.76 910.32909.70 909.86909.79909.87909.61909.78909.16909.16909.18909.25909.38909.74909.75909.70909.92910.24910.55911.06910.96910.97913.97 914.07912.21912.13913.59914.01911.11910.76 914.55 914.37911.48914.00 914.56914.57911.41 911.63 912.29 913.43913.88915.14915.58 915.05915.06913.35912.67912.92912.46912.02911.90912.16911.75911.05912.02912.22911.94911.52911.01911.58911.03911.18911.43 911.28911.23 910.91910.97910.75910.89 910.79 910.71911.10 910.74 910.63910.78911.29910.87 910.75910.96 911.14 913.62913.48912.99 914.14914.97915.00915.24915.24914.68915.39915.72915.95 915.69915.64915.22914.69 914.42914.529 1 4 . 5 8914.93915.33 917.26918.49918.34916.66912.99913.75 913.17913.91914.47913.80914.26914.88914.32914.44914.57914.75915.25914.70914.94915.55915.04915.26915.87915.28 9 1 6 . 2 5 917.509 1 5 . 5 6 9 1 6 . 1 9 9 1 5 . 5 6 9 1 5 . 8 9 9 1 6 . 4 0 9 1 5 . 7 2 9 1 6 . 7 0 9 1 5 . 6 6 916.529 1 6 . 7 4 9 1 6 . 0 1 9 1 5 . 8 1 916.679 1 6 . 3 9 9 1 6 . 8 6916.32915.32915.06914.709 1 4 . 2 2914.149 1 3 . 9 5 9 1 3 . 9 9914.149 1 4 . 2 7 914.86915.75916.16916.38916.679 1 6 . 7 2 9 1 5 . 1 5 9 1 5 . 2 1 915.01914.419 1 4 . 3 1 9 1 4 . 4 7 915.16915.009 1 4 . 9 8 9 1 5 . 0 3 914.949 1 5 . 0 3 9 1 4 . 9 3 9 1 5 . 7 8XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX OTTER LAKE ROADCLVTELEV=911.10CLVTELEV=911.65CLVTELEV=910.60CBR=913.05I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.44I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.34I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=914.38I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.12I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=916.08I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=913.88I=I=I=I=I=I=SMH SSWRR=916.84I=I=I=I=I=I=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dllllllllllllllllll6651CBC914.14>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.5%1.7%1.6%1.5%915 912913914 907910 908909911899899907910 908909911 11.411.511.710.612.916.2ME14.311.511.4909912 O.C.S. 1RIM: 908.10INV (IN): 904.60INV (OUT): 907.1048" DIA26' - 18"RCP @0.00%CONNECT TO EX. MH- 18"INV: 906.80118' - 18" RCP @ 0.25%915915915915915 914 914 916 91 6 910908909 909909 910911912913910911911912913915913914916 91591691091117.7ME12.413.311.815.1ME15.014.9913912911914 913 15.7ME12.112.011.511.511.411.911.514.4ME14.2ME13.413.5ME13.0ME7.9ME16.4MEDELINEATED WETLANDWETLAND BUFFER LINEGRADING LIMITSRSHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812C301.dwg 8/14/2023 12:37:28 PM DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDCLIENT PROJ. NO.ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTAOUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION0T7.129812DATELIC. NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPAREDBY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.BRENT H. JOHNSON 2037808/14/2023MJIMAMBHJC3.01GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANFEETSCALE050100HORZ.R1C4.0191212.6910910.55LEGENDREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP) DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONME = MATCH EXISTINGEOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOWTC = TOP OF CURBPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTUREPROPOSED RIP RAPPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET G0.01, TITLE SHEET, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. WETLAND BUFFER IS BASED OFF A 25' MIN, 50' AVERAGE. THE 50' OFFSET EQUATES TO 26,229 SQ FT. THE MODIFIED 50' AVERAGEEQUATES TO 27,279 SQ FT.NOTES>>>>9C4.0111C4.015C4.01 R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812L101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:37:56 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION 0T7.129812DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KATHERINE A. GOULD, PLA 58699 08/14/2023 KAG KAG KAG L1.01 SIGNIFICANT TREE TABLE SIGNIFICANT TREE SURVEY DATA: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X CLVT CLVT CLVT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D90991 0 9 1 5 9 1 4 91 391 1 91291391 4 910 915916914913910915 920920 915 914913912911915915916 916915 914llll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X S1 2 6 24 26 66 71 75 94 140 147 148 168 170 190 191 193 194 195 196 197 198 201 241 242243 253 267 268 0 18 28 30 32 37 25 22 31 36 39 41 42 43 46 4748 49 50 51 54 57 58 55 59 61 65 63 67 171 172 169 173 174 175 89 90 91 9596 99 117 129 131 133 135 146 176 3 4 9 13 20 35 77 161 165 10 12 14 162 186 192 206 207 235 237 239 240 179 180 181 183 184 185 202 203 204 205 222223 224 225 226 227 228 232 233 234 238 238 244 245 246 247 248 249250252 261 262 264 178 166 167 115 116 119 139 269 87 132 82 83 84 85 86 236 257 200 208209 210211212213214 215 118 97 98 157 160 158 153156 154 156 100 101 102 103 221 113112 114 111 104 105 108 106 107 110 111 263 136 137 138 127 126 122 121 123 145 141 144 143 142 68 69 70 93 130 134 149150 92 R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812L101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:37:59 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION 0T7.129812DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KATHERINE A. GOULD, PLA 58699 08/14/2023 KAG KAG KAG L1.02 TREE SURVEYFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.RNOTE: SEE SHEET L1.01 - SIGNIFICANT TREE TABLE FOR INFORMATION ON EXISTING TREES SHOWN. LEGEND EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE PRESERVED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X XXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXXX XX X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X CLVT CLVT CLVT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D90991 0 9 1 5 9 1 4 91 391 1 91291391 4 910 915916914913910915 920920 915 914913912911915915916 916915 914llll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X S1 2 6 24 26 66 71 75 94 140 147 148 168 170 190 191 193 194 195 196 197 198 201 241 242243 253 267 268 0 18 28 30 32 37 25 22 31 36 39 41 42 43 46 4748 49 50 51 54 57 58 55 59 61 65 63 67 171 172 169 173 174 175 89 90 91 9596 99 117 129 131 133 135 146 176 3 4 9 13 20 35 77 161 165 10 12 14 162 186 192 206 207 235 237 239 240 179 180 181 183 184 185 202 203 204 205 222223 224 225 226 227 228 232 233 234 238 238 244 245 246 247 248 249250252 261 262 264 178 166 167 115 116 119 139 269 87 132 82 83 84 85 86 236 257 200 208209 210211212213214 215 118 97 98 157 160 158 153156 154 156 100 101 102 103 221 113112 114 111 104 105 108 106 107 110 111 263 136 137 138 127 126 122 121 123 145 141 144 143 142 68 69 70 93 130 134 149150 92 R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812L101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:38:01 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION 0T7.129812DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KATHERINE A. GOULD, PLA 58699 08/14/2023 KAG KAG KAG L1.03 TREE PRESERVATION PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.RNOTE: SEE SHEET L1.01 - SIGNIFICANT TREE TABLE FOR INFORMATION ON EXISTING TREES SHOWN. LEGEND EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE PRESERVED EXISTING TREE PROTECTION FENCING APPROXIMATE PLACEMENT - SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET L2.01 X X X (3) ULPR (1) CASP (1) CASP (3) CEOC (3) BENI (3) QUBI (3) LALA (3) QUBI (3) LALA (3) BENI (3) OSVI (3) CASP XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X CLVT CLVT CLVT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D90991 0 9 1 5 9 1 4 91 391 1 91291391 4 910 915916914913910920920 915 914913912911915915916 916915 914llll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X SCANOPY TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CALIPER CONTAINER BENI 6 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH 2" CAL.B&B CASP 5 CATALPA SPECIOSA NORTHERN CATALPA 2" CAL.B&B CEOC 3 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2" CAL.B&B LALA 6 LARIX LARICINA TAMARACK 2" CAL.B&B OSVI 3 OSTRYA VIRGINIANA AMERICAN HOPHORNBEAM 2" CAL.B&B QUBI 6 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2" CAL.B&B ULPR 3 ULMUS AMERICANA 'PRINCETON' PRINCETON ELM 2" CAL.B&B PLANT SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES: LANDSCAPE PLANTING 1. MASTER PLANT SCHEDULE: ALL TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS ARE LISTED IN THE MASTER PLANT SCHEDULE. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE, THE PLAN QUANTITIES SHALL PREVAIL. 2. PROVIDE PLANT MATERIAL OF SIZE, GENUS, SPECIES, AND VARIETY SHOWN AND COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS OF 2014 ANSI Z60.1 "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK." ALL PLANTING MATERIAL SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3. PLANTING LAYOUT: STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLANTING. PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON THE LOCATION OF EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE PRESERVED. IF PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS CONFLICT WITH NON-SIGNIFICANT TREES NOT INCLUDED IN TREE SURVEY, OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALTERNATE TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. TREES LOCATED IN TURF AREA SHALL BE MULCHED TO 18 INCHES FROM TRUNK (36" DIA RING) IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND INSTALLED TO A DEPTH OF 3". 5. WHERE ADJACENT TO A PAVED SURFACE, FINISHED PLANTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING PAVEMENT. 6. IN ALL LOCATIONS WHERE EXISTING TURF AND VEGETATION IS DISTURBED, SEED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 (MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL). 7. SEE SHEETS L1.01 - L1.03 FOR INFORMATION ON EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES. R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812L101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:38:03 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION 0T7.129812DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KATHERINE A. GOULD, PLA 58699 08/14/2023 KAG KAG KAG L1.04 TREE MITIGATION & LANDSCAPE PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.RLEGEND EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE PRESERVED CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIREMENT: CANOPY COVERAGE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(17).(a).1.(c) CANOPY COVER STANDARDS, WHICH STATES "CANOPY COVER REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT SURFACE PARKING OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL UNIT DRIVEWAYS, AND PERMITTED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS." TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENT: FOR TREES REMOVED OUTSIDE THE BASIC USE AREA (20' BEYOND FOOTPRINT OF IMPROVEMENTS), TREES MUST BE MITIGATED AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: ·FOR DECIDUOUS TREES 6-12" DBH OR EVERGREEN TREES BETWEEN 12-20' TALL, PROVIDE ONE TREE PER TREE REMOVED. (30 REQUIRED) ·FOR DECIDUOUS TREES OVER 12" DBH OR EVERGREEN TREES OVER 20' TALL, PROVIDE TWO TREES PER TREE REMOVED. (2 REQUIRED) ·30 + 2 = 32 REQUIRED MITIGATION TREES 10' HEIGHTNOTES: 1.POST SPACING FOR 10' HIGH FENCING SHALL NOT EXCEED 8' O.C. 2.BOTTOM RAIL SHALL BE PLACED NO MORE THAN 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 3.POSTS NOT REQUIRING FOOTINGS MAY BE AIR DRIVEN.6"1 5/8" TOP RAIL CHAIN LINK FENCE 1 5/8" BOTTOM RAIL FINISH GRADE CONCRETE MAINTENANCE STRIP 1'-3" WIDE & 12" DEPTH CONCRETE FOOTING 12" x 48" FOR END, CORNER, GATE AND PULL POSTS 1 5/8" MIDDLE RAIL (10' FENCE) CHAIN LINK FENCE01 L2.02 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE BETWEEN GATE POST AND GATE SUCH THAT GATE IS IN LINE WITH FENCING WHEN FULLY CLOSED AND LATCHED. 1 1/2" LONG HANDLE (ONE ON EACH SIDE OF LATCH) LATCH RECEIVER (ONE EACH SIDE OF LATCH) LATCH ARM (ONE ON EACH SIDE OF GATE) LATCH HINGE SECURE LATCH TO GATE PROVIDE MECHANISM TO ALLOW GATE TO BE SECURED WITH PAD LOCK SECURE LATCH RECEIVER TO GATE DOUBLE SWING GATE LATCH02 L2.02 NOT TO SCALE R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights Reservedch:\tomascom_pr\0t7129812\CAD\C3D\129812L101.dwg 8/14/2023 12:38:05 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSION 0T7.129812DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KATHERINE A. GOULD, PLA 58699 08/14/2023 KAG KAG KAG L2.02 FENCE DETAILS SECTION OF SCREENING FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST03 L2.02 NOT TO SCALE SECTION CUT ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE (FACING WEST) SOUTHERN LIMITS OF EAST PROPERTY LINE NORTHERN LIMITS OF EAST PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 10' VINYL FENCE PROPOSED 10' CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING 3-4' METAL FENCE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING TREE, TYP. AAMH: 30AAMH: 30BBMH: 30PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PARKING LOTEXISTING BUILDINGNEW STORAGE LOTSTORM PONDOTTER LAKE ROAD0.10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.00.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.10.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.30.8 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.61.4 1.10.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.41.1 1.41.22.01.41.0 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.3 1.9 1.93.2 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.51.72.8 3.24.2 2.31.40.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.8 3.1 3.73.0 1.9 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.51.52.4 2.61.91.41.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.21.7 1.51.31.10.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.21.41.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.90.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.01.51.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.40.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.84.13.4 2.11.50.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.21.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.3 0.1 0.0 0.00.8 0.2 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.00.7 0.2 0.0 0.00.3 0.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULETYPE AA: 21,000 LUMEN, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTIONTYPE BB: 21,000 LUMEN, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, HOUSE SIDE SHIELDMH = MOUNTING HEIGHT IN FEET OF LIGHTING FIXTURE ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE. (3' CONCRETE BASE WITH 27' SQUARE STEEL POLE)1ELECTRICAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1"=30'-0"ELECTRICAL EP1.0LIGHTING FIXTURE TYPES AA & BBCopyright c 2023 by Hallberg Engineering, Inc.SHEET NO. :DATE :REG. NO.:08/11/2023SHEET TITLE :NO.DATEREVISIONSDESCRIPTIONDATE :PROJECT NO.:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:R23-4574.00008/11/2023FaxPhoneH A L L B E R GMechanical/Electrical Consulting EngineersWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110ENGINEERING1750 Commerce CourtPAUL J. FETTINGER43079I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of MINNESOTA.(651) 748-9370(651) 748-1100DJKJWVLINO LAKES, MN OUTDOOR STORAGE EXPANSIONNPHOTOMETRIC PLAN XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X CLVT CLVT CLVT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D50.0'90991 0 9 1 5 9 1 4 91 391 1 91291391 4 910 915916914913910915 920920 915 914913912911915915916 916915 914llll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.RH:\TOMASCOM_PR\0T7129812\CAD\C3D\FIGR-129812-IMPERVIOUSAREAS.dwg 8/15/2023 3:29:29 PMR OUTDOOR STORAGE TOMAS COMPANIES IMPERVIOUS AREAS AUGUST 2023 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 3.22 ACRES EXISTING STORAGE 1.29 ACRES NEW STORAGE 2.06 ACRES EXISTING PARKING, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS 3.25 ACRES TOTAL AREA 19.11 ACRES - CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.46 ACRES SITE 17.65 ACRES Attachment 5: Impervious Surface Exhibit 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: August 30, 2023 Re: Glamos Wire Storage Expansion CUP Plan Review 023534-000 WSB reviewed the plans for the Glamos Wire Storage Expansion site in Lino Lakes, MN, received August 14, 2023. The site is 17.93 acres and located at 2300 Main Street South of County Road 14 and east of County Road 84. Comments were made on the following documents: •Glamos Wire Outdoor Expansion plans prepared by Bolton & Menk, dated August 14, 2023 The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering •Grading A grading plan was provided for the storage expansion including paved areas, curb, and a basin. Water from the previous storage area to the north is collected in a drainage swale that runs around the outside of the curbed area (western) or sheet flows through this paved area (eastern) Comments: 1. The applicant shall clarify the proposed rim elevation of the pond OCS. The detail shows an elevation of 910.4 and the drainage plan sheet shows 908.1. 2.Call out the EOF for basin 3.Eliminate the southwestern curb cut and direct drainage from northwestern corner to southern curb cut to minimize short circuiting of basin for treatment (0.8% slope) 4.Existing spot elevations do not appear to match the existing contours in the previous storage area in the northeast corner. 5.Verify whether there is an existing storm sewer structure east of what is shown on the plans. The storm sewer is not shown starting at a structure. 6.The fence and vehicle gate are shown crossing the drainage swale at the northwest corner of the storage area. Verify that these do not impede drainage or will collect debris that would impede drainage. •Stormwater Management The stormwater management for the storage expansion consists of an existing rain garden and proposed sedimentation basin. Based on the provided HydroCAD modeling and water quality calculations in the stormwater report, this project meets City requirements for rate control and water quality treatment. Attachment 6: Engineering Review Memo - 2300 Glamos Wire Storage Ms. Katie Larsen 08/30/2023 Page 2 Glamos Wire Storage Expansion Engineering Review Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 18.98 30.11 58.70 Not provided Proposed 17.22 26.86 51.29 Not provided Comments: 1.The applicant shall clarify the proposed rim elevation of the pond OCS. The detail shows an elevation of 910.4 and the drainage plan sheet shows 908.1. 2.The applicant shall revise the BMP design in the northwest corner of the basin. Locating an inlet that flows over the OCS and into the basin will result in flow shortcutting and potential long-term damage to the structure. It is recommended to shift the inlet location, OCS, or both to avoid this risk. 3.The applicant shall revise the riprap shown on the plans to cover the surface down to the normal water level of the pond. Current plans limit riprap to an elevation of 908, leaving approximately 10’ of unarmored ground at risk of erosion from flows into the basin. a.It is also recommended that the NWL and 100-yr HWL footprint of the BMP be shown on the plans. 4.As proposed, the swale routed to the inlet at the northwest corner of the pond flows through a fence. The applicant shall revise the fence design at this location to ensure flows can pass freely and without risk of clogging from debris. •Water Supply Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. Comments: 1.We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the proposed plan to verify fire protection •Sanitary Sewer Utilities are not proposed or shown for the site. •Transportation Vehicle access will occur through the existing storage area south of the building. No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated and a traffic study is not required. Comments: 1.A vehicle access gate is shown on the northwest corner of the proposed lot, but it is not evident how this gate will be used considering the proposed swale in that location and lack of impervious for driving. The applicant shall clarify this gate design. Ms. Katie Larsen 08/30/2023 Page 3 Glamos Wire Storage Expansion Engineering Review •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan Wetlands are shown on the existing survey for the site. RCWD issued a decision in 2007 which found two incidental wetland areas on the property. Comments: a.Applicant to verify that wetland buffer requirements are being met. i.Rice Creek Watershed District to review •Landscaping Landscaping plans were provided as part of the submittal. The City’s Environmental Coordinator to review landscaping and provide in-depth comments. •Floodplain No floodplain impacts are proposed on site. RCWD to review whether RCWD floodplains are impacted with the project. •Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are required over stormwater management areas (pipe and basin). •Development Agreement A Development Agreement is not applicable for this application. •Grading Agreement A Grading Agreement is not applicable for this application. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained, and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration. Ms. Katie Larsen 08/30/2023 Page 4 Glamos Wire Storage Expansion Engineering Review •Permits Required 1.NPDES General Construction Permit 2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for construction 3.Rice Creek Watershed Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: 9/05/23 Re: Environmental Comments/8-30-23/Glamos Wire Outdoor Storage-Amend CUP Environmental Board had the following comments at the 8-30-23 EB meeting: 1. The following emerald ash borer infested trees must be removed: •11 trees along Otter Lake Road east of the sidewalk. •Trees 208-215 in the northeast corner of the property. These trees have the potential to impact public safety and cause off-site property damage. All other ash trees on the site that have not been treated to prevent emerald ash borer infestation should be removed as well. 2. Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) has been observed within a one-mile radius of the site. The MN DNR flyer and factsheet on this turtle must be provided to all contractors working on the site. Any sightings of this species should be reported to City staff so that the turtles can be safely relocated. 3. A vegetation management plan will be required for the berm and any additional exposed soil resulting from the unpermitted grading activities. This will include a vegetation assessment that identifies the plant species currently present. Depending on the results of the assessment, a plan to prepare the site for native seeding may also be required. 4.Erosion blanket must be a natural net variety. A note stating this should be added to the Sediment and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C2.01), the Erosion Control Blanket Detail (Sheet C4.01), and the BMP Quantity Summary (Sheet C2.02). Environmental Memo Attachment 7: Environmental Coordinator Memo - Glamos Wire Page 2 5.Buffer and Screen comments: •West perimeter: 10 foot high fence; additional shrubs required to cover 50% of the west perimeter fence that faces Otter Lake Road •South perimeter: 8 foot high fence •East perimeter: 8 foot high fence 6. The provided Tree Protection Detail must be replaced with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail on Sheet L2.01. All trees planned for preservation will require tree protection fence to be installed in accordance with this detail. Also, the Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) must be shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C3.01). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of sediment and erosion control measures. 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: September 13, 2023 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-General Updates CASE NUMBER: TA2023-007 APPLICANTS: City of Lino Lakes REVIEW SCHEDULE: Not Applicable-City Initiated INTRODUCTION Ordinance No. 08-22 amending City Code Chapter 1007: Zoning Code was adopted in November 2022 and went into effect in January 2023. When administering a new zoning code, it is not uncommon to find language that needs to be amended or typos that need to be corrected. The following is a summary of proposed zoning code amendments. Strikethrough is deleted text, underline is new text. ANALYSIS Recreational Businesses The new ordinance only allows for indoor recreational businesses as permitted uses in the GB, General Business and LI, Light Industrial districts. Staff recommends these permitted uses also be allowed in all business districts and the GI, General Industrial district. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.110 NB, Neighborhood Business District. (6) Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in the NB District: (a) Adult use – accessory. (b) Office business – clinic. (c) Office business – general. 2 (d) Personal services (subject to any licensing requirements of City Code, County, or State). (e) Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building. (e)(f) Restaurants. (f)(g) Retail business. (g)(h) Service business – on-site. (h)(i) Liquor sales: on-sale. (i)(j) Community gardens operated by the City. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.111 LB, Limited Business District. (6) Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in the LB District: (a) Adult use – accessory. (b) Liquor sales – on and off sale. (c) Office business – clinic. (d) Office business – general. (e) Personal services (subject to any licensing requirements of City Code, County, or State). (e)(f) Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building. (f)(g) Residential extended care facilities such as nursing homes. (g)(h) Restaurants. (h)(i) Retail business. (i)(j) Service business – off-site. (j)(k) Service business – on-site. (k)(l) Community Gardens operated by the City. 3 • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.121 GI, General Industrial District (7) Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in the GI District: (a) Beverage production and bottling, including public tours of the facilities and gift shops containing merchandise directly related to the facility. (b) Building material sales. (c) Commercial (production) bakery. (d) Community gardens operated by the City. (e) Construction-related businesses, including contractor storage of equipment and building materials if enclosed within a building, but not storage yards. (f) Feed and seed sales. (g) Greenhouses, nurseries. (h) Indoor Self-Storage. (i) Laundry, dry cleaning or dying plant. (j) Manufacturing or assembly of a wide variety of products that produces no exterior noise, glare, fumes, noxious products, by-products, or wastes, or creates other objectionable impact on the environment, including the generation of large volumes of traffic. (k) Mass transit terminals. (l) Office business—clinic and general. (m) Radio and television stations. (m)(n) Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building. (n)(o) Warehousing and distribution facilities, but not including trucking terminal or mini self-storage facilities. (o)(p) Wholesale businesses/showrooms. PSP, Public and Semi-Public Street Right-of-Way Parking Lot & Recreation Facilities Setback 4 The new ordinance does not include a street parking lot setback. Staff recommends 15ft which is consistent with the business and industrial zoning districts. The ordinance also does not address recreation facility/athletic field setbacks. Staff recommends 15ft consistent with parking lot setbacks. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.130 PSP, Public and Semi-Public District. (2) Lot and Setback Requirements. (c) Setbacks. 1. From Street Right-of-Way. a. Local or Minor Collector Street. 50 feet. b. Major Collector or Arterial Street. 50 feet. c. Parking Lot. 15 feet. b.d. Recreation Facilities/Athletic Fields. 15 feet. Data Centers The new ordinance only allows data centers as permitted uses in the BC, Business Campus district. Staff recommends also allowing them in the LI, Light Industrial and GI, General Industrial districts. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.120 Light Industrial District. (7) Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in the LI District: (a) Beverage production and bottling, including public tours of the facilities and gift shops containing merchandise directly related to the facility. (b) Building material sales. (c) Carpet and rug cleaning. (d) Community gardens operated by the City. 5 (e) Construction-related businesses, including contractor storage of equipment and building materials if enclosed within a building, but not storage yards. (e)(f) Data centers. (f)(g) Feed and seed sales. (g)(h) Greenhouses, nurseries. (h)(i) Indoor Self-Storage. (i)(j) Laundry, dry cleaning, or dying plant. (j)(k) Manufacturing or assembly of a wide variety of products that produces no exterior noise, glare, fumes, noxious products, by-products, or wastes, or creates other objectionable impact on the environment, including the generation of large volumes of traffic. (k)(l) Mass transit terminals. (l)(m) Office business—clinic and general. (m)(n) Radio and television stations. (n)(o) Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building. (o)(p) Research laboratories (p)(q) Trade or business schools. (q)(r) Warehousing and distribution facilities, but not including trucking terminal or mini self-storage facilities per City Code Section 1007.001(2). (r)(s) Wholesale businesses/showrooms. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.121 GI, General Industrial District. (7) Permitted Uses. The following are permitted uses in the GI District: (a) Beverage production and bottling, including public tours of the facilities and gift shops containing merchandise directly related to the facility. (b) Building material sales. (c) Commercial (production) bakery. 6 (d) Community gardens operated by the City. (e) Construction-related businesses, including contractor storage of equipment and building materials if enclosed within a building, but not storage yards. (e)(f) Data centers. (f)(g) Feed and seed sales. (g)(h) Greenhouses, nurseries. (h)(i) Indoor Self-Storage. (i)(j) Laundry, dry cleaning or dying plant. (j)(k) Manufacturing or assembly of a wide variety of products that produces no exterior noise, glare, fumes, noxious products, by-products, or wastes, or creates other objectionable impact on the environment, including the generation of large volumes of traffic. (k)(l) Mass transit terminals. (l)(m) Office business—clinic and general. (m)(n) Radio and television stations. (n)(o) Warehousing and distribution facilities, but not including trucking terminal or mini self-storage facilities. (o)(p) Wholesale businesses/showrooms. General Building and Use Provisions The following general revisions need to be made to better clarify intent of the ordinance. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.043 General Building and Use Provisions. (2) Building Type and Construction. (a) Single Family Detached Dwellings. All single family detached dwellings shall meet the following design criteria: 5. All dwellings and any attached garage, excluding porches, shall have a minimum 4/12 roof pitch and shall be covered with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. 7 5. All dwellings and any attached garage, excluding porches, shall have a minimum 4/12 roof pitch. 6. All dwellings and any attached garage shall be covered with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. 6.7. All dwellings shall be built in compliance with the Minnesota State Building Code. 8. The exterior walls of all single family dwellings shall be similar in appearance to standard wood or masonry residential construction. Any metal siding upon single family residence structures shall have a vertical dimension no greater than 12 inches. Sheet metal siding shall not be permitted. 7. (d) Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional. All buildings constructed on land within commercial, industrial, public and semi-public zoning districts, and all institutional buildings (such as public, education, and religious buildings) in residential and rural zoning districts shall conform with the following: 7. Any wall facing a public right-of-way shall not have an uninterrupted length exceeding 100 feet without including at least two of the following: change in plane, change in texture or masonry pattern, two (2) class 1 materials, windows in a manner that is impactful to the design, or an equivalent element that subdivides the wall into human scale proportions. This shall only apply to commercial, public, educational, and religious buildings. 7. 16. Building foundations not exceeding two (2) feet need not comply with the requirements for the primary water wall treatments or materials. Quasi-Public Structures The following sections were accidently deleted from the previous zoning ordinance and should be added back in. There is no change in the language. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.043 General Building and Use Provisions. (2) Building Type and Construction. (e) Quasi-Public Structures. 1. No quasi-public structure shall be located within the public right-of-way except as approved by the City Council. Such structure shall include but not be limited to trash containers, 8 bicycle racks, benches, planting boxes, awnings, flag poles, light standards, stairs, stoops, light wells, loading wells, signs and others. 2. Public and quasi-public utility poles and underground services may be permitted within public right-of-way provided that: a. A permanent identification tag or marking is affixed to each structure. b. The City is notified as to the location and date of placement of the structure. c. The City is notified of any change of structure ownership, removal or modification. d. Lease or joint use agreements or arrangements applicable to each utility structure are disclosed. (f) Completion of Exterior Improvements. 1. All exterior improvements of a structure, or portion thereof, to single family dwellings, multiple family dwellings of twelve (12) units or less, or any structure accessory to a residential use shall be completed in accordance with City-approved construction plans within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date the City issued the building permit. 2. All exterior improvements of a structure, or portion thereof, to multiple family dwellings of more than twelve (12) units or any commercial, industrial, office, institutional or non- residential structure shall be completed in accordance with City-approved construction plans within one (1) year after the date the City issued the building permit. 3. In all cases, the compliance deadline shall be upheld unless: a. The process for a temporary Certificate of Occupancy is completed as described in the City Fee Schedule, as amended, which would extend the completion date beyond those listed in paragraphs 1. and 2. above; or b. A written extension is submitted and approved by the Building Official. Such an extension may be granted in the event that a natural disaster or a calamitous event occurs which unavoidably delays the completion of the building project. 4. For building permits issued prior to the effective date of the ordinance amendment establishing the time limits in paragraphs 1. and 2. above (Ordinance No. 01-08), the time period for the limits begins with the effective date of the amendment establishing the time limits. Off-Street Parking The old ordinance requirement for Fast Food parking spaces was fifteen (15) spaces per 1,000 sf of gross floor area. The new ordinance is one (1) space per 50sf of floor area plus one (1) space 9 for each employee. Staff recommends going back to the old ordinance. Applying the new ordinance results in an overabundance of parking spaces than needed. For consistency with other parking requirements, staff recommends changing the requirement based on 1 space per 67 gross sf (1,000/15 = 67). • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.044 Off-Street Parking. (6) Number of Spaces Required. The following minimum number of off-street parking spaces shall be provided and maintained by ownership, easement and/or lease for and during the life of the respective uses hereinafter set forth: Fast Food Restaurant 1 space for each 50 67 square feet of gross floor area., plus 1 space for each employee of the maximum work shift. Native Landscapes Minnesota passed a new law effective July 1st that requires municipalities to allow property owners and occupants to install and maintain managed natural landscapes. This statute needs to be adopted into City ordinances. See attached State Statute 412.925 Native Landscapes language. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.043(17) Screening, Landscaping, Buffer Yards and Tree Preservation. (h) Sod and Ground Cover. All areas not otherwise improved in compliance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of four (4) inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Exceptions to these criteria may be approved by the Zoning Administrator as follows: 5. Natural Prairie Restoration Areas. Native grasses and wild flowers indigenous to Minnesota, planted and maintained on any occupied lot or parcel of land, setback a minimum of 20 feet from the front lot line and/or side lot line abutting a public street, as part of a garden or landscape treatment. 5. Native Landscapes in compliance with Minnesota Statute 412.925. General Parcel, Lot and Yard Provisions. Section 1007.082 was the proposed FUD, Future Urban Development District that was not adopted in the new ordinance. This reference under Section 1007.042 shall be deleted. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.042 General Parcel, Lot and Yard Provisions. 10 (2) Unsewered Lots. (a) Except as provided for in City Code Section 1007.042(1)(d), Section 1007.042(2)(b) and , Section 1007.066 and Section 1007.082, the minimum unsewered lot size within any zoning district is 10 acres. Fences The following correction shall be made. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.043(18) Fences and Retaining Walls. (f) Rural and Residential District Fences. 4. Rural and Residential Fences Height Exceptions. a. A fence for a sport court not exceeding 12 feet in height may be located at least 10 foot from side and rear lot lines. b. Residential and rural boundary line fences not exceeding eight (8) feet in height may be located along a lot line abutting a commercial, industrial, or semi-public use or zoning district. I-35W and I-35E Setbacks The current zoning ordinance establishes Street Right-of-Way setbacks. On a double frontage lot, the street right-of-way setback applies to both the front and rear lot lines. For example, the properties 248-400 Apollo Drive are zoned LI, Light Industrial. The street right-of-way setback from both CSAH 12 (Apollo Drive) and I-35W, both arterial streets, is 50 feet. In practice, a 50 foot front setback has been applied along Apollo Drive and a 15-30 foot rear setback has been applied along I-35W. Technically, the rear setback should be 50 feet. This would unnecessarily encumber the rear yard. Staff is proposing parcels abutting I-35W or I-35E that are zoned industrial have a street right-of- way setback along the interstate of 15 feet which is consistent with the required rear lot line setback. • Proposed Amendment (This is just an example of how the LI, Light Industrial District will read. The final amended ordinance will include the same changes for the GI, General Industrial and BC, Business Campus Districts.) Section 1007.120 LI, Light Industrial District. 11 (2) Lot and Setback Requirements. (c) Setbacks. 1. From Street Right-of-Way. a. Local or Minor Collector Street. 30 feet. b. Collector or Arterial Street. 50 feet. b.c. I-35W or I-35E. 15feet. c.d. Parking Lot. 15 feet. 2. Rear Lot Line. a. Principal Building. 15 feet. b. Accessory Building. 10 feet. c. Parking Lot. 5 feet. 3. Side Lot Line. a. Principal Building. 10 feet. b. Accessory Building. 10 feet. c. Parking Lot. 5 feet. 4. From Property Guided by the Comprehensive Plan for Residential Use. 75 feet. (3) Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line in an LI District coincides with an adjacent public road right-of-way or abuts property guided by the comprehensive plan for residential or commercial development, a landscape buffer area shall be provided along such side or rear lot line not less than 40 feet wide and shall contain landscaping, planting, berming, or other effective screening suitable to provide an effective screen in compliance with City Code Section 1007.043(17)(f). Setbacks-Major Collector Streets In all zoning districts, the setback from Street Right-of Way is either from: a. Local or Minor Collector Street. b. Major Collector or Arterial Street. 12 Unfortunately, the word “Major” was accidently left out in some of the zoning districts and will be corrected accordingly. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.110 NB, Neighborhood Business District. (2) Lot and Setback Requirements. (c) Setbacks. 1. From Street Right-of-Way. a. Local or Minor Collector Street. 30 feet. b. Major Collector or Arterial Street. 40 feet. c. Parking Lot. 15 feet. PUD, Planned Unit Development District The following corrections/additions are needed to the PUD zoning district. • Proposed Amendment Section 1007.131 PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (5) List of PUD, Planned Unit Developments. The following is a list of PUD, Planned Unit Developments: (a) Rice Lake Estates. 1. Ord. No. 09-88, Adopted August 8, 1988. (b) Pineridge Addition. 1. Ord. No. 08-90, Adopted September 10, 1990. (c) Wenzel Farms. 1. Ord. No. 04-91, Adopted April 8, 1991. 2. Ord. No. 06-91, Adopted April 8, 1991. (d) Park Grove. 1. Ord. No. 15-92, Adopted August 10, 1992. 13 (e) Quail Ridge. 1. Ord. No. 15-92, Adopted August 10, 1992. (f) Willow Ponds. 1. Ord. No. 17-92, Adopted September 14, 1992. 2. Ord. No. 11-95, Adopted July 10, 1995. (g) Country Lake Estates. 1. Ord. No. 93-10, Adopted July 26, 1993. (h) Trappers Crossing. 1. Ord. No. 14-94, Adopted August 22, 1994. (i) Behms Century Farm. 1. Ord. No. 08-95, Adopted May 8, 1995. (j) Apollo Meadows Townhomes (CIC 34). 1. Adopted December 16, 1996. (k) Surfside Addition. 1. Ord. No. 22-97, Adopted September 8, 1997. 2. Res. No. 99-47, Adopted June 28, 1999. (l) Highland Meadows West. 1. Ord. No. 32-97, Adopted November 10, 1997. 2. Ord. No. 03-00, Adopted February 14, 2000. (m) Clearwater Creek 3rd-5th Addition. 1. Ord. No. 08-99, Adopted April 26, 1999. (n) Apollo Business Park (CIC 224 Lino Lakes Condo). 1. Ord. No. 09-99, Adopted April 26, 1999. (o) Lino Lakes Commercial Development/JADT Addition 1. Ord. No. 12-99, Adopted May 10, 1999. (o)(p) Peregrine Pass. 14 1. Res. No. 99-25, Adopted May 24, 1999. 2. Ord. No. 14-99, Adopted June 14, 1999. (p)(q) Spirit Hills Center. 1. Ord. No. 08-02, Adopted December 9, 2002. (q)(r) Keefe Estates. 1. Ord. No. 05-03, Adopted March 10, 2003. (r)(s) Millers Crossroads. 1. Ord. No. 20-03, Adopted October 13, 2003. (s)(t) Lino Lakes Market Place. 1. Ord. No. 16-01, Adopted August 27, 2001. 1.2.Ord. No. 03-05, Adopted July 11, 2005. 2.3.Ord. No. 04-05, Adopted June 27, 2005. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed zoning ordinance text amendments. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minnesota Statute 412.925 Native Landscapes 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to local government; requiring cities to allow native landscapes on private 1.3 land; prohibiting certain vegetation overgrowth within cities; proposing coding 1.4 for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 412. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. [412.925] NATIVE LANDSCAPES. 1.7 (a) A statutory city or home rule charter city shall allow an owner, authorized agent, or 1.8 authorized occupant of any privately owned lands or premises, to install and maintain a 1.9 managed natural landscape. For purposes of this section, the terms are defined as follows: 1.10 (1) "managed natural landscape" means a planned, intentional, and maintained planting 1.11 of native or nonnative grasses, wildflowers, forbs, ferns, shrubs, or trees, including but not 1.12 limited to rain gardens, meadow vegetation, and ornamental plants. Managed natural 1.13 landscapes does not include turf-grass lawns left unattended for the purpose of returning to 1.14 a natural state; 1.15 (2) "meadow vegetation" means grasses and flowering broad-leaf plants that are native 1.16 to, or adapted to, the state of Minnesota, and that are commonly found in meadow and 1.17 prairie plant communities, not including noxious weeds. Noxious weed shall have the 1.18 meaning assigned by section 18.77, subdivision 8; 1.19 (3) "ornamental plants" means grasses, perennials, annuals, and groundcovers 1.20 purposefully planted for aesthetic reasons; 1Section 1. REVISOR MS/AD 23-0253301/18/23 72Printed Page No.State of MinnesotaThis Document can be made available in alternative formats upon request HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H. F. No. 734NINETY-THIRD SESSION Authored by Hansen, R.; Klevorn; Pursell; Nelson, M.; Fischer and others01/23/2023 The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on State and Local Government Finance and Policy Adoption of Report: Placed on the General Register02/27/2023 Read for the Second Time Attachment 1: Minnesota Statute 412.925 Native Landscapes 2.1 (4) "rain garden" means a native plant garden that is designed not only to aesthetically 2.2 improve properties, but also to reduce the amount of stormwater and accompanying pollutants 2.3 from entering streams, lakes, and rivers; and 2.4 (5) "turf-grass lawn" means a lawn comprised mostly of grasses commonly used in 2.5 regularly cut lawns or play areas, including but not limited to bluegrass, fescue, and ryegrass 2.6 blends, intended to be maintained at a height of no more than eight inches. 2.7 (b) Managed natural landscapes may include plants and grasses in excess of eight inches 2.8 in height and that have gone to seed, but may not include any noxious weeds and must be 2.9 maintained. 2.10 (c) Except as part of a managed natural landscape as defined in this section, any weeds 2.11 or grasses growing upon any lot or parcel of land in a city to a greater height than eight 2.12 inches or that have gone or are about to go to seed are prohibited. 2Section 1. REVISOR MS/AD 23-0253301/18/23