The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/10/2024 PZ Combined Packet CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, January 10, 2024 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 8, 2023 6. OPEN MIKE 7. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Jansen Addition Preliminary Plat B. PUBLIC HEARING: Water Treatment Plant Property (6590 12th Avenue) Rezoning from R-1X to PSP C. PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Renumeration and Codification 8. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates 9. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike – The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more – groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing – Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on November 8, 2023. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Kohler moved to approve the October 11, 2023 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth. Mr. Vojtech abstained. Motion carried 5 – 0. 5. OPEN MIKE Mr. Root declared open mike at 6:31 p.m. There were no public comments. Mr. Evenson moved to close open mike. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Open mike was closed at 6:32 p.m. 6. ACTION ITEMS DATE: November 8, 2023 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 9:32 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech Michael Root, Perry Laden, Neil Evenson, SaraJo Stewart, Neil Evenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Julie Whitney Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2023 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES A. Lyngblomsten PUD Amendment #2-North Lot Line Fence and Pickleball Court Ms. Katie Larsen presented the staff report. The applicant, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for PUD Amendment #2 to the PUD Preliminary Plan and Final Plan. They are requesting the proposed fence along the north lot line not be required. They are also requesting a pickleball court be constructed in the southwest corner of the development. Mr. Evenson questioned the elevation and Ms. Larsen confirmed that it did vary in elevation. Mr. Evenson asked if the neighbors on Rohavic Lane, due to the variance, would be able to see over the fence? Ms. Larsen stated the developers could address this question further and added the homeowner at 288 Rohavic Lane was in favor of the fence. Mr. Wipperfurth questioned if there were originally any plans in the PUD for the southwest corner. Ms. Larsen said it was going to be open space. Mr. Kohler inquired about the cost for a noise study. Ms. Larsen said she was unsure. Mr. Kohler thought this discussion should be tabled until a noise study could be completed. Mr. Kohler also questioned the definition of mid-size trees that would be used in lieu of the fence. Mr. Grochala stated caliper trees and coniferous trees would be used and could potentially fill in the area within 5 years. Mr. Vojtech wanted to know if the black hills spruce trees would be enough to fill in the space and be a barrier to the street. Ms. Larsen said that it would when mature. Mr. Root wanted to add requirements for use of the court. He thought no lighting should be allowed and restricted hours. Mr. Root also thought the SE corner should have spruce trees wrapped around the corner up against the chain link fence for additional screening. Judd Fenlon, Grand Real Estate Advisors, 90 Dale Street S, St Paul MN 55102. Mr. Fenlon stated the original design does not always align with the as built as is the case with the fence on the north property line. He added the change in grading heading east has a considerable dip. The east end of the property is elevated and he thinks the fence would not be aesthetically appealing and believes trees would serve a better purpose. He also added the pickleball court is considered private and there would only be one court and it would therefore have less traffic. Mr. Fenlon said it would not be illuminated and there will be restricted use to the Lyngblomsten community. Mr. Laden wanted to know if any other areas on the property were considered for the pickleball court? Mr. Root thought that the court could be moved further to the northeast. Mr. Felon said a civil engineer looked at the property and it was determined to be the best area for drainage and enough room for handicapped accessibility. Mr. Root opened the public hearing at 6:58 p.m. Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2023 Page 3 DRAFT MINUTES Courtney Hoadley, 255 Ash Street, Lino Lakes, MN. Ms. Hoadley said when she measured her house to the proposed court it was 12 feet from her fence and 60 feet from her home. She said the court is exposed to her back yard and front yard. She said there is no privacy fence and only some bushes that are there. She said pickleball is a loud sport and the sound hitting the paddle in pickleball is at 70 decibels. She indicated that the City report had 40 to 70 but stated 40 was for tennis. She said 60 decibels was the maximum exposure for baby and toddlers and she has a toddler and a baby on the way and anytime they are outside they will be exposed to the additional noise. There are several townhouses and there is a possibility the game could be played all day. She said another concern is the court is visible from her front and back yard and wherever she is on her property she will be exposed to the court. Mrs. Hoadley thought the least that could be done if they do not move the pickleball court is to provide them with a 6 foot privacy fence that was offered to other residents. Martin Shockency, 255 Woodridge Lane, Lino Lakes MN 55014. Mr. Shockency said his concerns were noise, extra people and that Lyngblomsten did some things that were not good such as removing trees from his property. He said he was reimbursed for them but did not feel it was anywhere near what the trees were worth. He said he appreciated the Hoadley’s as neighbors and feels the treatment done to them is unnecessary. He also said his back yard used to be dark until the dump station came in and the light floods his back yard. Jessica Hidding, 692 County Road J West, Shoreview MN. Ms. Hidding wanted to know why the pickleball court was not in the original plan two years ago. She also said she is kiddy corner from where they are proposing the court go and said that the trees that they are proposing are not going to cover the area. There are trees there now that have been there for years and do not cover it. She feels the best option is to move the court. She has concerns about the noise, hours of operation and access. Ms. Hidding also addressed the buildings and businesses proposed for the property and thinks the pickleball court would be best indoors. She also feels communication from the City could be better. Thomas Dzik, 268 Rohavic Lane, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Dzik was not in favor of the fence due to his location and that he would see right through it. He said he also does not want to see the wetland boxed in. He is intending to plant trees in the back and would like to see the wildlife remain. Bill Olson, 283 Hammerly Court, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Olson said his patio is 30 ft to the top of the berm which is 4 to 6 ft high. He said if the 6 ft fence were put on the berm it would be a 10 ft block out. Mr. Olson presented a written statement with resident signatures in opposition to the fence height. The received written statement is attached for inclusion in the permanent record. Wallace Guptill, 298 Rohavic Lane, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Guptill had been in favor of the fence, but he lives in a two story house and the fence does not offer any obstruction to the court. He is in favor of using trees to screen the area. He said it is Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2023 Page 4 DRAFT MINUTES private property and if they chose they could cut down the trees. He said it is not their preference and he would like to see more trees added to that area. Mr. Guptill said when they came in and cut trees down to make room for their homes, the red oaks began dying due to the added sunlight and dry weather. Jack Turner, 267 Hammerly Court, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Mr. Turner is in favor of the pickleball court. He understands the resident’s concerns but feels there is value to the residents to have the pickleball court and does not feel the effects of the court would be terrible. He researched pickleball courts and would argue that passing traffic or a toilet flushing is louder than a strike of a paddle from a 70 year old. He has no opinion as to where it is located but feels there is great value in having it and believes it would prolong the life of the residents. Marie Hammond, 263 Hammerly Court, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Ms. Hammond is not in favor of the fence and appreciates being close to nature. She thinks a fence would not be aesthetically appealing or would serve a purpose. Mr. Vojtech moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. The public hearing was closed at 7:23 p.m. Mr. Root summarized resident concerns and asked the representative of Lyngblomsten to answer some concerns. Mr. Root asked about the trees that were taken down by mistake. Mr. Fenlon said the contractor did remove the trees and the resident was compensated. Mr. Root addressed the bright lighting at the lift station and Mr. Grochala said there were things they could do to adjust the lighting and the City would look into it. Mr. Wipperfurth stated he was against the pickleball court and the fence. He is in favor of adding more landscaping than was proposed. Mr. Laden thinks the pickleball court should be placed somewhere else on the property. Mr. Laden would like to see more landscaping on the property of Lyngblomsten so the buffer will stay intact. Mr. Root supported amending the PUD to not have the fence requirement and also agrees with a requirement for additional landscaping. Mr. Root is not in favor of the pickleball court at this time. He added that if it is the Board’s decision to go ahead with the pickleball court that there should be no lighting and controlled access. Mr. Root expressed it was a good amenity, just not at that location. Robert Hulse, 258 Rohavic, Lino Lakes MN 55014. Mr. Hulse said as a homeowner he would be willing to put in additional landscaping on his property. Mr. Root appreciated the idea but said that future homeowners could remove that buffer if it was on their property. Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2023 Page 5 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Wipperfurth moved to amend the PUD amendment #2 subject to the removal of the fence along the north property line and with the condition that we would add landscaping completed by a landscape architect per the recommendation of staff and to not allow the pickleball court in the proposed location. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 7 - 0. B. Natures Refuge North PUD Concept Plan Review Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan review. The proposed residential development is a 108 lot single family conservation subdivision. The development contains 2 parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres. It is located north of Natures Refuge and is called Natures Refuge North. Ms. Emily Baker, MNI Homes, 5354 Parkdale Drive, Suite 000, St Louis Park MN 55416. Ms. Baker covered the reasons for requesting flexibility. She said in terms of smaller lots that they are targeting the empty nesters who do not want larger lots and smaller lots would increase the availability of lower priced homes. Ms. Baker said there is an HOA that is enforced by the builder that prohibits garage use solely for storage and requires trailers and recreational vehicles to be kept in the garage when not in use. The regulation will be the responsibility of the HOA. She did say many of their plans have attic type storage and she addressed architectural features of the houses and the flexibility they were requesting. Mr. Vojtech inquired about the pricing of 80 ft wide lots. Mr. John Rask with M/I Homes stated those lots would start at around $550,000. The villa lots would be base price upper $400,000. Mr. Laden asked if the single family homes would be in the HOA like the villas and Ms. Baker stated they would not. She said they may be in a master HOA just to maintain common areas. Ms. Carol Featherstone, 631 Andall Street, Lino Lakes, MN 55014. Ms. Featherstone said when she purchased the property she knew that the area was going to be developed and that a proposed road would go through her property to Nature’s Point. Ms. Featherstone stated her complaint is that her property will connect to three of the properties in the development. Ms. Featherstone said she enjoys nature and it is difficult to know that will be going away due to the development. She wanted to be sure the City was considering what the people wanted and not just what the developers wanted. She said she is concerned about the increased traffic. Planning & Zoning Board November 8, 2023 Page 6 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Wipperfurth wanted to know if there was intent to develop Wollan park more in the future? Mr. Grochala said it will be a natural open space park to improve the wetlands there and long term to get some trails. Mr. Wipperfurth went on to address concerns with street width reduction and saving trees in the area. He thinks it is an excellent opportunity for trails in that area and a non-traditional park. Mr. Laden questioned if sidewalks are required, and Ms. Larsen stated they were. He also addressed concerns with architectural standards regarding lot sizes. Mr. Laden asked if there was a park planned for this development. Ms. Larsen said there is a plan for a neighborhood park, but the comp plan also discusses an opportunity to have a partnership with the school. If the school is not interested, there would need to be further discussion with the Park Board. Mr. Root thought that the design of the house needed to be looked at more closely and did not like the “all garage” look to the house. Ms. Stewart had concerns regarding the density in the development. Mr. Root summarized that everyone seemed to be in favor of the open space and there were mixed opinions regarding the architectural standards. Ms. Larsen questioned the Board if the developer should be required to hold neighborhood meetings prior to Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat? The Board agreed they should. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 49/J Streetscape Discussion Mr. Grochala presented the concept design for the roundabout at Hodgson Road and County J. B. Project Updates Staff provided an update on projects. Mr. Wipperfurth moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Vojtech. Meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Julie Whitney – Community Development Administrative Assistant 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: January 10, 2024 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Jansen Addition Preliminary Plat CASE NUMBER: PP2023-003 APPLICANT: Boulder Contracting Attn: Brian Jansen 16522 Wake Street NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 OWNER: Louise Kay Fortuna Trustee 500 N. Bryan Road K-15 Mission, TX 78572 REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: December 26, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline:February 24, 2024 120-Day Review Deadline:April 24, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: December 27, 2023 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 10, 2024 City Council Work Session: February 5, 2024 City Council Meeting: February 12, 2024 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Boulder Contracting, submitted a land use application for preliminary plat for Jansen Addition. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 523 Lois Lane into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family homes. The lot is 1.11 gross acres (48,510 sf). The Land Use Application is: •Preliminary Plat 2 o 3 lots This staff report is based on the following information: • Certificate of Survey and Resource Inventory Map prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 • Landscape Plan prepared by Plowe Engineering dated December 7, 2023 • Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 • Tree Inventory/Removals prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 • Civil Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering dated December 7, 2023 • Soil Boring Data prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering Company dated December 18, 2023 • Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 BACKGROUND Existing Site Conditions The residential lot contains an existing house, attached garage, deck, fence, and detached shed. The house was built in 1982. The Certificate of Survey indicates Zimmerman Fine Sand and Soderville Fine Sand. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 7.5 to 9 feet. Zoning Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential 2040 Comp Plan Land Use Low Density Sewered Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North R-1 Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R-1 Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East R-1 Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential 3 West R-1 Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential ANALYSIS Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 1.11 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 1.11 # of Units 3 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.70 Net Density (units/acre) 2.70 The parcel is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Requirements The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Lot 2 will contain the existing single family house. Lots 1 and 3 are being created for the purpose of constructing two (2) single family homes. 4 R-1 Requirements Lot 1 (Proposed House) Lot 2 (Existing House) Lot 3 (Proposed House) Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 10,867 sf 19,425 sf 12,075 sfa Min. Lot Width --Corner Lot 100 ft NA NA NA --Interior Lot 80 ft 80.5 ft 84.5 ft 80.0 ft Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 135.0 ft 135.0 ft 154 ft Building Setback (ft) -From Streets Lois Lane and Arlo Lane (Both Minor Collector) 30 ft 40.0 ft 40.0 ft 40.0 ft -Rear Yard --Principal 30 ft 30.0 ft 70 ft 30.0 ft -Accessory 5 ft Future 50 ft (deck) Future -Side Yard --Principal 10 ft 10 ft 11.6 ft 10.0 ft --Accessory 5 ft 10 ft 10.6 ft 10.0 ft Impervious Surface 65% TBD w/ building permit 21.3% TBD w/ building permit a Lot Size = Gross Area – Oversized Easements = Net Area (23,835 sf – 11,760sf = 12,075 sf) The proposed lots meet zoning requirements. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family houses proposed on Lots 1 and 3 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards. Subdivision Ordinance The legal description of the parcel is Lot 2, Block 1, Mar Don Acres and was platted in 1978. Similar residential subdivisions of Mar Don Acres lots have been approved in previous years (Cavegn Estates-2006, Hailey Manor-2007, Isabell Estates-2014 and Golden Acre-2017). 5 Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential development and zoning code requirements for R-1, Single Family Residential as discussed above. Blocks and Lots The preliminary plat contains Lots 1-3, Block 1, Jansen Addition. As noted above, Lot 2 contains the existing house and Lots 1 and 3 propose new single family homes. Streets and Alleys Lots 1 and 2 are served by Lois Lane which is a minor collector road. The existing road right-of-way width is 60 ft which is consistent with previously approved plats in the area. No additional road right-of-way is needed. Lot 3 is served by Arlo Lane which is a minor collector road. The existing road right-of- way width is 60 ft which is consistent with previously approved plats in the area. No additional road right-of-way is needed. Staff evaluated the need to extend the 30ft wide road right-of-way along the entire north lot line to potentially serve 511 Lois Lane and determined it wasn’t feasible. An additional 30ft of road right-of-way would be needed from 7901 Henry Lane and a public street would need to be constructed to serve the potential one (1) or two (2) additional lots that could be created at 511 Lois Lane. Easements The Mar Don Acres final plat has existing drainage and utility easements dedicated per the plat. These easements will remain in place. Standard drainage and utility easements at least ten (10) feet wide have been provided along all other lot lines. An oversized drainage and utility easement exists on Lot 3 in the rear yard over the stormwater management facility. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Per the December 18, 2023 RCWD CAPROC, the project includes subdivision of an area exceeding one acre, thus triggering Rule C. The single-family residential subdivision does not create a new public road nor a private road serving three or more lots; therefore, Rules C.6 and C.7 do not apply per Rule C.12(d). An infiltration basin is proposed to meet City requirements. The applicant submitted a stormwater drainage report with the application. The proposed BMP and associated stormwater modeling is not required by the District due to the Rule C.12(d) exception and has not been reviewed as part of this application. 6 Utilities Sanitary Sewer A 2” pressurized sanitary sewer main exists along this section of Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house is on private septic system and shall connect to municipal sanitary sewer. The private septic system shall be removed. The new house proposed on Lot 1 will also be connected to municipal sanitary sewer. An 8” sanity sewer main exists along Arlo Lane and two (2) sets of laterals are stubbed to the lot line on Lot 3. The new house will be connected to municipal sanitary sewer. The other lateral shall be removed. Watermain An 8” watermain exists along Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house is currently on a private well and shall connect to the municipal watermain. The private well shall be disconnected from the house. It may be used for irrigation or it shall be abandoned. The new house proposed on Lot 1 will also be connected to the municipal watermain. An 8” watermain exists along Arlo Lane and two (2) sets of laterals are stubbed to the lot line on Lot 3. The new house will be connected to the municipal watermain. The other lateral shall be removed. Public Land Dedication The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area. The development is not within the greenway system. Arlo Lane is identified as a future trail corridor that is proposed to extend from Highland Meadows Park to Woodduck Trail and eventually to 4th Avenue. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 2 with the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 2 x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300 = Total Due $6,600 Landscape Plan Per the December 27, 2023 Environmental Board staff report: 7 Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required for all new residential subdivisions at a rate of one tree per lot frontage. The existing house has trees in the right-of-way area and will not require an additional boulevard tree. Boulevard trees are shown on the landscape plan for lots 1 and 3. The tree on Lot 1 must be moved into the right-of-way area. Boulevard tree requirements are not currently met. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners’ reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey was performed that identified: Of the 49 total trees in the inventory, 24 trees will be removed, 25 will be preserved. The 25 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. 23 of the tree removals are in the Basic Use Area (BUA). 8 of these are in Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) and will require mitigation at a rate of one tree planted for four removed. 15 of the 23 trees in the BUA are in non-ESA and will not require mitigation. One tree planned for removal is in non-BUA and non-ESA. This tree will require mitigation at a one to one ratio. Overall, for the 24 removals, 3 mitigation trees will be required. These trees must be added to the Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met. Total Trees 49 Total Trees Removed 24 Total Trees Preserved 25 Mitigation Trees Required 3 8 Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Mn DOT seed mix (33-261) is noted in the details for the stormwater basin. The ground cover types must be added to the Landscape Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Wetlands There are no wetlands on site. FEMA Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district. Impervious Surface Coverage 9 The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 2 (existing house) is at 21.3% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lot 1 and 3 will be evaluated with those individual building permits and surveys. Traffic Study A traffic study was not required for one (1) new single family lot on the Lois Lane and one (1) single family lot on Arlo Lane. Both streets are minor collectors and have capacity for one (1) additional single family home on each street. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Public Safety Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety Department-Police Division and Fire Division reviewed the preliminary plat and had no comments. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their December 27, 2023 meeting and noted some with minor revisions are needed. These are summarized in the attached December 28, 2023 Environmental Coordinator memo. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010. Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Jansen Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan 10 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the parcel is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed three (3) single family and net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is located in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. Housing Plan A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Jansen Addition meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing. Economic Development The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the City’s economic development plan. Transportation Plan A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Lois Lane and Arlo Lane are minor collector roads and they both have capacity to accommodate one (1) new single family home. Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems. Jansen Addition protects the natural surface and groundwater storage with the construction of a stormwater management infiltration basin. Erosion and sediment control practices will also be implemented. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The existing house and two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 2” pressurized system and 8” sanitary sewer main. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for three (3) single family houses. Water Supply Plan 11 A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The existing house and two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 8” watermain. The existing water supply system has capacity for three (3) single family houses. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. FINDINGS OF FACT-PRELIMINARY PLAT Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Jansen Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and 12 d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Jansen Addition is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. 13 Jansen Addition meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Lois Lane and Arlo Lane are minor collector roads and have capacity to accommodate two (2) new single family homes. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Jansen Addition will have an adequate water supply. The existing house and two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 8” watermain. The existing water supply system has capacity for three (3) single family houses. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Jansen Addition will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The existing house and two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 2” pressurized system and 8” sanitary sewer main. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for three (3) single family houses. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Jansen Addition with the following conditions: 1. The existing house on proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Jansen Addition shall connect to municipal watermain and municipal sanitary sewer. 2. The private septic system located on proposed Lot 2, Block1, Jansen Addition 14 shall be removed. 3. The private well located on proposed Lot 2, Block1, Jansen Addition shall be capped if it cannot be used for private irrigation. 4. The new houses on proposed Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Jansen Addition shall connect to municipal watermain and municipal sanitary sewer main. The following items shall be addressed in conjunction with the final plat submittal: 1.Comments from City Engineer Memo dated January 4, 2024 shall be addressed. 2.Comments from Environmental Coordinator Memo dated December 28, 2023 shall be addressed. 3.Sheet S1, Certificate of Survey: a.Under Building Setbacks: i. Collector street shall be revised to minor collector street. ii.40ft shall be revised to 30ft. b. The location of the private septic system shall be shown. 4. Sheet S2, Preliminary Plat: a.Under Area, the gross density and net density shall be revised to match staff report. b. Under Building Setbacks: i. Collector street shall be revised to minor collector street. ii.40ft shall be revised to 30ft. c.All Building Setbacks (BLDSB) shall be revised accordingly. d. The impervious surface percentage shall be provided for Lot 2. The following items shall be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylars: 1. The existing shed shall be removed. 2. The existing fence shall be relocated onto proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Jansen Addition. a.An approved zoning permit is required to relocate the existing fence. The following items shall be addressed prior to issuing building permits for with Lot 1 or Lot 3, Block 1, Jansen Addition: 1. The existing house on proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Jansen Addition shall connect to municipal watermain and municipal sanitary sewer. 2. Proof that the private septic system on Lot 2, Block 1, Jansen Addition has been properly removed shall be submitted to the City upon completion. 3. If removed, proof that the private well located on Lot 2, Block 1, Jansen Addition has been properly capped shall be submitted to the City upon completion. ATTACHMENTS 1.Site Location & Aerial Map 2. City Engineer Memo dated January 4, 2024 15 3. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated December 28, 2023 4.Certificate of Survey, Preliminary Plat, Civil Plan Set and Landscape Plan prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. and Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 Lois Ln HenryLnArlo L n Legend Address Labels Parcels January 4, 2024 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 200 Ft Jansen AdditionAttachment 1: Site Location & Aerial Map 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: January 4, 2024 Re: Jansen Addition Preliminary Plat & Civil Plan Review 024233-000 As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans for the Jansen Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received December 7, 2023. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Jansen Addition – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated December 7, 2023. •Jansen Addition – Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations prepared by Plowe Engineering, received December 7, 2023. •Jansen Addition – Certificate of Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated December 7, 2023. •Jansen Addition – Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated December 7, 2023. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. Engineering •Grading The Jansen Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to create three (3) single-family lots and an infiltration basin. The infiltration basin treats the rear drainage from the three lots while the remaining drainage flows to Lois Lane to the south. Comments: 1.Call out the proposed high point on the east side of Lot 1 •Adjust proposed contours to maintain minimum 2% slope where possible 2.There is an existing low area at the southeast front corner of Lot 1 •Consider coordinating with the adjacent existing property owner to fill in the low area and prevent it from backing up to the east. •Adjust grading along the eastern side lot line of Lot 1 to allow for drainage to reach the street. Attachment 2: City Engineer Memo Dated January 4, 2024 Ms. Katie Larsen 01/04/2024 Page 2 Jansen Addition Engineering Review 3.Shift the northern limit and overflow weir of the infiltration basin to the south 10' to allow for overflow drainage to be established on this property prior to discharging to the north •Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the site consists of a proposed infiltration basin. However, based on site layout, stormwater management is not required under City ordinance. Comments on the proposed stormwater design are offered below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 0.61 2.01 6.17 Not required Proposed 0.51 1.00 4.46 Not required Comments: 1.To be conservative in HWL modeling, exfiltration cannot be modeled as an outflow. Please remove exfiltration on node P1 of the proposed conditions HydroCAD model and update the 100-yr HWL accordingly. 2.Permanent turf reinforcement matting such as Armormax is not allowed as a form of stabilization for BMP overflows. Riprap can be extended to cover the overflow weir. 3.While noted in the infiltration basin detail, please show silt fence around the basin on the erosion control plan sheets to ensure proper sediment control is provided. •Water Supply The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services extended to the lots. Comments: 1.An additional water and sanitary sewer service stubbed from Arlo Lane will need to be removed back to the main. Restoration to include; •Roadway section shall be 3.5” bit over 8” class 5 •Curb and gutter - see City standard details. 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 2) to the provided sanitary sewer and water service stubs with construction •Water service stub is 1" copper (Type K) 3.Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 1 per MDH requirements with construction •Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation use if MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services (currently they do not appear to meet setback requirements). Ms. Katie Larsen 01/04/2024 Page 3 Jansen Addition Engineering Review •Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by an existing 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC gravity service pipe (Lot 3) and two 1¼” diameter Schedule 40 PVC low pressure service pipes (Lots 1 & 2) extended to the lots from Arlo Lane and Lois Lane. Lots 1 & 2 will require E-One or approved equal grinder pump stations to connect to the City system. Comments: 1.Show septic system for existing house (Lot 2) •Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with construction 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 2) to the provided sanitary sewer and water service stubs with construction •Sanitary sewer service stub is 1 1/4" PVC SCH 40 •Show installation of E-One or equivalent grinder pump station 3.Show existing sanitary sewer stubs to Lots 1 & 2 as 1¼” diameter Schedule 40 PVC 4.Provide a casting for the cleanout (if necessary) in the driveway •Transportation There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing single-family lot into three smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly more traffic. •Trails and sidewalks There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with none being proposed •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no wetlands identified on the site •Landscaping The Jansen Addition Site Landscape Plan has been reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. •Floodplain The Jansen Addition does not impact floodplain. •Drainage and Utility Easements The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single- family lot (10’ front and 30’ back; 5’ sides). Additional easements have been added around the perimeter of the smaller lots and the infiltration basin (minimum 10’ front and back; 5’ sides). Ms. Katie Larsen 01/04/2024 Page 4 Jansen Addition Engineering Review •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement No grading agreement is required for this site. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement No stormwater maintenance agreement is required for this site. •Permits Required 1.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 2.NPDES General Construction Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 To: Katie Larsen From: Andy Nelson Date: 12/28/23 Re: Environmental Comments/12-27-23/Jansen Addition Preliminary Plat Environmental Board had the following comments at the 12/27/23 EB meeting: 1. Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) for the 25 trees scheduled for preservation must be shown to scale on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1 and C1.2), and the Landscape Plan (Sheet L1). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of sediment and erosion control measures. 2. Replace note on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan about installing “Perimeter Control Devices” for tree protection with “Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail”. 3. The Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) note #3 mentions protecting trees to the dripline. This statement must mention protecting trees in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail provided on Sheet C3.2. 4. The tree planting detail shall include comments about exposing root flare so it is visibly at grade to ensure trees are installed at proper depth, and that mulch is pulled back 3 inches from the trunk (mulch is not left touching the trunk). 5.3 mitigation trees are required. These trees must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet L1). 6. The boulevard tree shown for Lot 1 must be moved south into the right-of-way. Environmental Memo Attachment 3: Environmental Coordinator memo Dated December 28, 2023  Page 2 7. Ground cover types must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet L1). This includes cover type for all exposed soil areas (ex: sod for the lots, specify Mn DOT seed mix for stormwater basin). Attachment 4: Certificate of Survey, Preliminary Plat, Civil Plan Set and Landscape Plan prepared by EG Rud & Sons, Inc. and Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated December 7, 2023 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: January 10, 2024 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Water Treatment Plant Property (6590 12th Avenue) Rezoning from R-1X to PSP CASE NUMBER: RZ2023-001 APPLICANT: City of Lino Lakes OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 10, 2024 City Council Work Session: January 22, 2024 City Council Meeting-1st Reading: January 22, 2024 City Council Meeting-2nd Reading: February 5, 2024 INTRODUCTION The City is rezoning the property located at 6590 12th Avenue from R-1X, Single Family Executive to PSP, Public and Semi-Public for the purpose of constructing the City’s water treatment plant. BACKGROUND The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the need for a City water treatment plant. In June 2020, a water treatment plant feasibility study was completed which recommended the construction of a conventional gravity filtration system. The study identified the southwest intersection of Birch Street and 12th Avenue as the best location. The site is located just east of Well No. 3. and is also within a mile of Well No’s. 1, 3, 5 and 6. Trunk watermain bisects the site and raw watermain can be installed efficiently to treat these four (4) wells at this central location. In May 2023, the City Council authorized purchase of the 6 acre parcel located at 6590 12th Avenue for the purpose of constructing the water treatment plant. The deed was recorded in August 2023. The property is currently zoned R-1X, Single Family Executive and will be rezoned to PSP, Public and Semi-Public to be consistent with the construction of a public building. 2 Tentative schedule is summer 2024 construction and 2026 operation. ANALYSIS This land use application is for rezoning only. An Architectural Design Committee consisting of City staff, two (2) Council members, and Oertel Architects staff have been working on the building design. Staff will complete a full site and building plan review when final plans are complete. Attached is a draft site plan and architectural rendering for reference only. Existing Site Conditions The 6 acre parcel is located at the southwest quadrant of CSAH 34 (Birch Street) and 12th Avenue. A minor subdivision was processed to subdivide this parcel from the larger parcel located at 6510 12th Avenue. Land Use and Zoning The parcel is guided low density residential per the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Per City Code Section 1007.070(5), essential services such as a water treatment plant are permitted in any zoning district. Therefore, a water treatment plant would be allowed in any land use classification. The parcel is currently zoned R-1X, Single Family Executive and will be rezoned to PSP, Public and Semi-Public to be consistent with the construction of the water treatment plant. Public buildings such as a water treatment plant are permitted uses in the PSP district. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North PUD Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R-1X Agricultural Low Density Sewered Residential East R-1X Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R-1X Utility (City Wellhouse) Civic/Institutional (City Wellhouse) FINDINGS OF FACT-REZONING Per City Code Section 1007.015 (4): 3 (d)The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning and future water treatment plant are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan’s Water Supply goal to provide the City’s residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. 2.The proposed action is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed rezoning and future water treatment plant are compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3.The proposed action conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed future water treatment plant shall conform with all performance standards. 4.The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. The proposed future water treatment plant can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. 5.Traffic generation by the proposed action is within capabilities of streets serving the property as described in City Code Section 1007.020(4)(d). The proposed future water treatment plant is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. CSAH 34 (Birch Street) is a minor arterial street. 12th Avenue is a major collector street. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning from R-1X, Single Family Executive to PSP, Public and Semi-Public. ATTACHMENTS 1.Site Location & Aerial Map 2.Current Zoning Map 3.Draft Site and Landscape Plan 4 4.Draft Architectural Rendering Pheasant Run SBlackDuckDr SPheasantRunAs p e n L n WhiteOakRdBuckthorn Ln WhitetailTrlChokecherry R d 12th AveWildTurkeyTr l34 Brandywood Park White O a k R d Legend Address Labels Parcels December 18, 2023 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 400 Ft Site Location Map-Water Treatment Plant RezoningAttachment 1: Site Location & Aerial Map Pheasant Run SBlackDuckDr SPheasantRunAspen L n WhiteOakRdBuckthorn Ln WhitetailTrlChokecherry R d 12th AveWildTurkeyTr l34 Brandywood Park White O a k R d Legend Address Labels Parcels Zoning R-1 - Single Family Residential R-1X - Single Family Executive PUD - Planned Unit Development December 27, 2023 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 400 Ft Current Zoning Map-WTPAttachment 2: Current Zoning Map WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETMBVLT44"SSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFSSSSSSOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OHEEEEEEEE OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FFFFFFFFF F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FF F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF F F F F F F F FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG DTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLDTLBIRCH STREET (COUNTY RD 34)12TH AVE3Kentucky Coffeetree2" Cal B&B3Spring Snow Crabapple1.5" Cal._B&B1Kentucky Coffeetree2" Cal B&BО О О ООООООООООООООООООООО О О 3White Pine8` B&BWATERLINE, SEE UTILITY PLANSSEWER LINE, SEEUTILITY PLANSWATERLINE, SEE UTILITY PLANSSTORM SEWER SEEUTILITY PLANSWATERLINE, SEEUTILITY PLANS3Swamp White Oak2" Cal B&B3Swamp White Oak2" Cal B&B2Street Keeper Honey Locust2" Cal B&B1Street Keeper Honey Locust2" Cal B&B3Red Sunset® Maple2" Cal B&B3Black Hills Spruce8` B&B3White Pine8` B&B3Black Hills Spruce8` B&B2Swamp White Oak2" Cal B&B3Red Sunset® Maple2" Cal B&B1Swamp White Oak2" Cal B&B2Autumn Brilliance Apple Serviceberry1.5" Cal._B&B1Spring Snow Crabapple1.5" Cal._B&B4Norway Spruce8` B&B1Kentucky Coffeetree2" Cal B&BFEET0H:INSCALE3060NOVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN1L-01LEGENDTYPE III SEED MIX (MN DOT WETLAND MIX)TYPE II SEED MIX (MN DOT MESIC PRAIRIE)TYPE I SEED MIX (TURF)PROPOSED CONTOUR965EXISTING CONTOUREXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEEXISTING CONIFER TREECONSTRUCTION LIMITSTYPE III SEED MIX TYP.TYPE II SEED MIX TYP.TYPE I SEED MIX TYP.LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS40% CANOPY COVER- REQUIRED (5,856 SF) = 7,056 SF PROVIDED2 LARGE TREES PER 100 LF- REQUIRED 4.4 = 6 TREES PROVIDED6 LARGE SHRUBS PER 100 LF- REQUIRED 13.2 = 30 SHRUBS OR EQUIV. PROVIDED1 TREE AND 2 SHRUBS PER 2500 SF OPEN LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 25.6 = 26 PROVIDED 6' HEIGHT SCREENING BUFFER REQUIRED = 6 ' HEIGHT PROVIDED50% SCREENING REQUIRED = 80% PROVIDED.OVERALLLANDSCAPEPLANL-01ENLARGEMENT, SEE SHEET L-02SHOWN021336-000WSB PROJECT NO.:SCALE:PLAN BY:DESIGN BY:CHECK BY:SHEETI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LIC. NO:DATE: REVISIONS NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONWATER TREATMENT PLANT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA K:\021336-000\Cad\Proposed\021336-000-LS-CONCEPT-PLAN.dwg 12/8/2023 5:19:19 PM ZHJGZHAttachment: Draft Site & Landscape Plan LINO LAKES WATER TREATMENT PLANTOERTELARCHITECTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL 12/20/2023Attachment 4: Draft Architectural Rendering LINO LAKES WATER TREATMENT PLANTOERTELARCHITECTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL 12/20/2023MANGANESE IRONSPOT BRICKSANDSTONE BRICK SANDSTONE BUFF PRECAST CONCRETEKALWALL DAYLIGHTING PANELCHARCOAL METAL SIDINGDARK CHARCOAL METAL FLASHING 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: January 10, 2024 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Renumeration and Codification CASE NUMBER: TA2023-010 APPLICANT: City of Lino Lakes OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: January 10, 2024 City Council Work Session: January 22, 2024 City Council Meeting-1st Reading: January 22, 2024 City Council Meeting-2nd Reading: February 5, 2024 INTRODUCTION The City is renumbering and codifying the zoning ordinance. BACKGROUND Ordinance No. 08-22 amending City Code Chapter 1007: Zoning Code was adopted in November 2022 and went into effect in January 2023. The City is incorporating the zoning code into the City’s online version Code of Ordinances published by American Legal Publishing. As part of the codification and to make the code easier to read, some section numbers of the zoning code are being renumbered. The content of the zoning code is not changing. ANALYSIS Attached is a table of the current and proposed zoning ordinance text amendment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed zoning ordinance text amendment. ATTACHMENTS 2 1. Table of Current and Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Table of Current and Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 1 CURRENT CITY CODE CHAPTER 1007 PROPOSED CITY CODE CHAPTER 1007 §1007.000 TITLE AND APPLICATION 1007.000 Title and application §1007.001 RULES AND DEFINITIONS 1007.001 Rules and definitions §1007.015 AMENDMENTS: TEXT AND MAP.1007.015 Amendments: text and map. §1007.016 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 1007.016 Conditional use permits §1007.017 INTERIM USE PERMITS 1007.017 Interim use permits §1007.018 VARIANCES AND APPEALS.1007.018 Variances and appeals. §1007.019 ADMINISTRATION: ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS AND APPROVALS. 1007.019 Administration: administrative permits and approvals. §1007.020 SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 1007.020 Site and building plan review §1007.021 DUTIES OF CITY STAFF.1007.021 Duties of city staff. §1007.022 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1007.022 Certificate of occupancy §1007.023 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES 1007.023 Enforcement and penalties §1007.024 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)1007.024 Planned unit development (PUD) §1007.025 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1007.025 Environmental review §1007.040 PURPOSE 1007.040 Purpose §1007.041 NON-CONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES 1007.041 Non-conforming uses and structures §1007.042 GENERAL PARCEL, LOT AND YARD PROVISIONS 1007.042 General parcel, lot and yard provisions §1007.043 GENERAL BUILDING AND USE PROVISIONS 1007.043 General building and use provisions §1007.044 OFF-STREET PARKING 1007.044 Accessory buildings, structures and uses §1007.045 OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES 1007.045 Refuse and recycling §1007.046 PRIVATE STREETS 1007.046 Outdoor lighting §1007.047 RELOCATED STRUCTURES 1007.047 Environmental Provisions §1007.048 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS 1007.048 Outdoor storage §1007.049 ACCESSORY APARTMENTS 1007.049 Screening, landscaping, buffer yards and tree preservation §1007.050 DRAINAGE 1007.050 Fences and retaining walls §1007.051 EARTH MOVING AND LAND RECLAMATION 1007.051 Submission of permit and site plan Attachment 1: Table of Current and Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Table of Current and Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 2 §1007.052 FARMING OPERATIONS 1007.052 Off-street parking §1007.053 ADULT USES 1007.053 Off-street loading spaces §1007.054 ANTENNAS 1007.054 Private streets §1007.055 ACCESSORY OUTDOOR DINING AREAS 1007.055 Relocated structures §1007.056 BATCH PLANTS 1007.056 Home occupation permits §1007.057 OPT OUT OF MINN. STAT. 462.3593 1007.057 Accessory apartments §1007.058 COMMERCIAL STABLES 1007.058 Drainage §1007.059 AGRITOURISM 1007.059 Earth moving and land reclamation §1007.060 WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM (WECS) 1007.060 Farming operations §1007.061 SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM 1007.061 Adult uses §1007.062 MODEL HOMES WITH TEMPORARY REAL ESTATE OFFICES 1007.062 Antennas §1007.063 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES 1007.063 Accessory outdoor dining areas §1007.064 MOTOR FUEL STATIONS 1007.064 Batch plants §1007.065 AIR PARK HANGAR AND ACCESS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 1007.065 Opt out of Minn. Stat. 462.3593 §1007.066 RURAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT. 1007.066 Commercial stables 1007.067 Agritourism 1007.068 Wind energy conversion system (WECS) 1007.069 Solar energy systems 1007.070 Model homes with temporary real estate offices 1007.071 Temporary structures 1007.072 Motor fuel stations 1007.073 Air park hangar and access performance standards 1007.074 Rural cluster development §1007.070 GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT PROVISIONS 1007.090 General zoning district provisions §1007.080 R, RURAL DISTRICT 1007.100 R, Rural District §1007.081 R-X, RURAL EXECUTIVE DISTRICT 1007.101 R-X, Rural Executive District Table of Current and Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment 3 §1007.090 R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1007.110 R-1, Single Family Residential District §1007.091 R-1X, SINGLE FAMILY EXECUTIVE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. 1007.111 R-IX, Single Family Executive Residential District §1007.092 R-2, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1007.112 R-2, Two Family Residential District §1007.093 R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. 1007.113 R-3, Medium Density Residential district §1007.094 R-4, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1007.114 R-4, High Density Residential District §1007.095 R-5, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS DISTRICT. 1007.115 R-5, High Density Residential and Business District §1007.096 R-6, MANUFACTURED HOME PARK DISTRICT 1007.116 R-6, Manufactured Home Park District §1007.110 NB, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT 1007.130 NB, Neighborhood Business District §1007.111 LB, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT 1007.131 LB, Limited Business District §1007.112 GB, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 1007.132 GB, General Business District §1007.120 LI, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 1007.140 LI, Light Industrial District §1007.121 GI, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 1007.141 GI, General Industrial District §1007.122 BC, BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT 1007.142 BC, Business Campus District §1007.130 PSP, PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC DISTRICT 1007.150 PSP, Public and Semi-Public District §1007.131 PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1007.151 PUD, Planned Unit Development