Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240228 Enivronmental Board Packet Combined CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING Wednesday, February 28, 2024 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 31, 2024 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. 440 Park Court(Lino Lakes Tech Center and Storage Facility) Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review B. 2024 Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List—2nd Draft 8. RECYCLING UPDATES 9. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike—The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more—groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember,the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing—Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer(Chair or Vice-Chair)will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four(4)minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments,the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s)and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Environmental Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. Environmental Board January 31,2024 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE: January 31, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:30 p.m. TIME ENDED: 7:37 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Sullivan, Cassie Cavegn, Shawn Holmes,Julia Nelson,Alex Schwartz Lindsay Buchmeier,Jonathan Parsons MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Andrew Nelson,Dana Rozan 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Sullivan called the Environmental meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on January 31, 2024. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Buchmeier made a motion to approve the December 27, 2023 meeting minutes. Motion was seconded by Ms. Cavegn. Motion carried 7—0. Chair Sullivan addressed the question Ms. Buchmeier had regarding if residents receive ads in the water bills sent electronically; the answer is no. 5. OPEN MIKE Chair Sullivan declared open mike at 6:32 p.m. There was no one present for open mike therefore it was closed at 6:32 p.m. 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Centerville Lake Alum Treatment Environmental Board January 31,2024 Page 2 Mr. Nelson, Environmental Coordinator,presented the staff report and introduced Matt Kocian, Lake and Stream Manager with Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Mr. Kocian presented his report regarding the Centerville Water Quality Updates. The main cause of high phosphorus loading in Centerville Lake is due to internal sediment recycling, which fuels algae blooms. The most commonly used tool to mitigate internal phosphorus loading is called Aluminum Sulfate ("Alum"). Alum permanently binds phosphorus in the sediments. In an effort to address algae bloom issues in Centerville Lake, RCWD requested a financial contribution of approximately 3% of the total project budget from each local partner to match the Clean Water Fund grant that will be funding the aluminum sulfate treatments. Ms. Nelson asked what are the conditions in order to start treatment in the Spring of 2024. Mr. Kocian replied that they would have to complete grant paper work and getting approval, as well as lining up contractors to do the work, which typically takes time. Ms. Holmes asked if they can start in the Summer of 2024. Mr. Kocian replied no because alum is best to apply in the spring when the water is the clearest and has less algae and nutrients in order for the alum to reach the bottom of the lake as quickly as possible. Mr. Kocian added that alum would only be applied to areas of the lake that are 10 feet or deeper where there is less oxygen. Additionally, as alum settles to the bottom of the lake, it is not a barrier and does not inhibit plant growth. Mr. Schwartz asked if there are more permanent solutions available, as opposed to expensive alum treatments every 15-20 years. Mr. Kocian responded that there are other seemingly permanent solutions to sediment phosphorus such as dredging or pumping high phosphorus water out of the bottom of the lake, but the cost of those tools are many times more expensive then alum in the long run. Chair Sullivan accepted to take public comments from those who came after open mic. Christopher Stowe, 426 Pine St, expressed concerns regarding exotic plants that may arise when phosphates are removed and allow for plant growth, such as Eurasian Watermilfoil. He also expressed concerns regarding taxpayers potentially contributing to several of the partner contributions,paying to RCWD and the City they live in. Catherine Decker, 614 Pine St, expressed concerns about the statement that a majority of the funding would pay for the alum treatment, noting that this would leave 49% of the DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board January 31,2024 Page 3 grant funding to RCWD's discretion as to how it would be spent. She was also opposed to residents paying increased taxes for the project. Ms. Holmes clarified that outreach programs are a key mechanism for residents to understand the importance of the treatment and have accurate information. She also asked if the grant required a match for the project. Mr. Kocian replied yes, 10%matching funds are required from RCWD and/or partners. Mr. Schwartz asked what percentage of the total project cost will be allocated towards the treatment project, contractors, and materials. Mr. Kocian replied the vast majority of the cost wArld towards the alum application. Ms. Nelson asked how badly of a problem Eurasian Watermilfoil is and if it does show up after the alum treatment. Mr. Kocian said Eurasian Watermilfoil has not been as much a problem in recent years, but pondweed, which is an invasive species, has been a problem in lakes. Mr. Kocian clarified that the Lake Association collaborated with RCWD for the past 3-4 years to map and treat pondweed and other invasive species. Ms. Nelson clarified since RCWD and the Lake Association monitored Eurasian Watermilfoil, then the main concern for residents would be the costs because there are already steps being taken to try to control invasive exotic water plants. Mr. Stowe replied that as a resident he would be paying the 3%through the contribution of Lino Lakes, Anoka County and RCWD. He also expressed that the Lake Association should be the only partner for the project. Mr. Schwartz clarified that whether or not the Board makes a motion to approve the project the project would still progress. He noted that the Environmental Board is not the best forum for discussing the financial and tax implications of the project. Ms. Cavegn agreed with Mr. Schwartz. She continued to say that the role of the Environmental Board is to proceed with what is most environmentally responsible. She also suggested bringing financial concerns up to City Council as the Environmental Board does not have input on financial aspects. Motion was made by Chair Sullivan and seconded by Ms. Nelson. Motion carried 7—0. B. 2024 Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List Mr. Nelson, Environmental Coordinator,presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES Environmental Board January 31,2024 Page 4 Chair Sullivan stated that the annual work plan and ongoing tasks list was under the purview of the Environmental Board and that the topic would not be opened to additional public comment at this time. The Board discussed the topics on the Annual Work Plan for 2024. Ms. Holmes recommended adding a statement specific to benefiting wildlife. Mr. Schwartz agreed. Greenway systems, wildlife protection, biodiversity and other elements regarding that should be highlighted as its own category/statement. Mr. Nelson responded that he could make a sixth category that highlights wildlife protection. He will present a new list for the next Environmental Board meeting. No motion was made on the Annual Work Plan 2024. The Board discussed the topics on the Ongoing Tasks List for 2024. Chair Sullivan and Ms. Holmes would like to see more public held events on the list for clarification, such as Blue Heron Days and other events the Board participates in. Mr. Schwartz suggested to broaden the statement regarding the Natural Resources category number 2 to include"and other natural areas". It was agreed that a motion would be made at the next Environmental Board meeting when a second draft will be reviewed. 7. GENERAL UPDATES None. .� 8. ADJOURN Mr. Schwartz made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:37 p.m. Motion was seconded by Ms. Holmes. Motion carried 7—0. Respectfully submitted, Dana Rozan—Office Specialist DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: February 281h, 2024 REQUEST: 440 Park Court—Lino Lakes Tech Center and Storage Facility Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review APPLICANT: Lariat Companies, Inc. 8345 Crystal View Road, Suite 200 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 OWNER: Same. BACKGROUND The applicant, Lariat Companies, Inc., submitted a land use application for conditional use permit and site plan review. The development proposes a 36,000 sf multi-tenant industrial and indoor self-storage building on the south end of the site. The north end of the site is the existing Lino Lakes Storage. This staff report is based on a review of the following documents: • Applicant Narrative dated January 8, 2023 • Civil and Landscape Plan Set prepared by Elan Design Lab dated January 25, 2024 • Photometric Plan and Lighting Details prepared by AID Electric Corporation dated January 4, 2024 • ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by E.G. Rud& Sons, Inc. dated January 26, 2024 • Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Elan Design Lab dated January 26, 2024 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC dated May 11, 2023 1 ANALYSIS General Site Characteristics There are currently 12 storage buildings on the north portion of the 5.74 acre parcel 440 Park Court. The proposed project includes construction of a 36,040 sf building on the southern portion of the parcel. The building will have 11 divided business suites for office/warehouse tenants, and a larger indoor self-storage area. 31 parking stalls are provided, with proof of parking for an additional 11 stalls should the need for additional parking arise in the future. Stormwater will be managed with a bio-filtration basin on the west portion of the site that will overflow to an existing basin to the north. Runoff from the southern portion of the site will flow to an existing wetland on the west perimeter. Land Cover Pre-settlement land cover (Marschner) was oak openings and barrens, a fire-dependent savanna dominated by oaks with an understory of forbs and grasses. Current land cover (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System) data on the site includes mostly seasonally flooded cattail marsh and an area of 51-75% impervious cover with perennial grasses in the south portion of the site. In recent years, mitigation work was performed to remove fill (mostly concrete). After removing the fill, the site was graded and seeded. Minimal maintenance was performed after seeding, so the current site vegetation is mostly non-native vegetation common to disturbed sites. The tree survey indicates a mix of cottonwood, aspen, and boxelder along the west portion of the site. Rare, Unique, or Significant Resources Forster's tern (Sterna forsteri) has been identified within a mile of the project site. This species utilizes open water and marsh for feeding and breeding habitat. The project is not expected to impact this species. A rare plant survey must be completed, with any required impact mitigation coordinated with the MN DNR. The project site is within a mile of, and drains to, Marshan Lake, which is an impaired water. This will impact timelines on soil stabilization and is noted in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 2 Soils The Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey notes the following soil types on the project site: Isanti fine sandy loam: hydrologic group B/D soil, hydric, moderately rapid to rapid permeability, and very poorly drained. Lino loamy fine sand: hydrologic group A, non-hydric, and somewhat poorly drained. Zimmerman fine sand: hydrologic group A soil, non-hydric, and excessively drained with rapid permeability and negligible to low surface runoff. Five soil borings to depths of 14.5 feet are planned. One of these borings will be in the location of the infiltration basin, the other four at building corners. The area of the stormwater infiltration basin appears to have rapid permeability and is not in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The site should be suitable for infiltration, but this will be reviewed further by the City Engineer and RCWD. Stormwater Management A stormwater management plan has been submitted and is being reviewed by the City Engineer. The following summary review is based upon the Stormwater Management Site Plan Review. Existing Conditions Runoff from the 12 storage buildings and paved drives on the north portion of the site is currently managed by an infiltration basin on the west portion of the site, and a wetland along the west perimeter. Proposed Conditions Under the proposed conditions, there will be an additional 57,954 sf feet (1.33 acres) of impervious surface. This will bring the total impervious surface at the site to 147,885 sf (3.39 acres). The total site area is 249,763 sf(5.73 acres). This is approximately 59% impervious surface. The L1-Light Industrial zoning district allows for 75% impervious surface,but Shoreland District allows for 60% impervious surface. The site appears meet these requirements. The runoff from the additional impervious surface will be managed with a bio-filtration basin on the west portion of the site abutting the wetland. The new basin will overflow to 3 the exiting pond to the north. The south portion of the site will continue to drain to the wetland as it does under existing conditions. Peak runoff rates do not exceed existing conditions for the 2- or 100-year storm events, with a small increase to the 10-year storm event runoff that the applicant's engineer deems negligible. The City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District will review. Stormwater Pollution Prevention The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan calls for inlet protections, silt fence around the construction limit perimeter, a rumble rack for the construction exit, natural net erosion blanket for the slopes on the berm and stormwater pond, and riprap for energy dissipation at outfalls to the stormwater pond. The site drains to an impaired water, so stabilization of soils must occur within 7 days of construction activity ceasing. This is noted in the project SWPPP. A concrete washout location must be shown on the Site Plan. Clarification is needed on access points for construction work. It appears that all access is planned to be through a single center drive lane. If construction traffic will access other drive lanes, they will also need construction exits. Flood Plain Site does not fall within the flood management zone. Shoreland District The eastern portion of the site does fall within the Shoreland District. This may impact vegetation clearing related to views to or from a lake, suitability of a site for onsite sewage or wells, impervious surface limits, shoreline alteration limitations, and site setbacks. The proposed project appears to be in compliance with any Shoreland District implications that would fall under the purview of the Environmental Board. The City Planner will be reviewing any additional Shoreland District implications for this site. Wetlands Per the wetland delineation report, there were two wetlands delineated on the site. 4 Wetland 1 was a 0.19 acre exempt storm pond wetland dominated by narrowleaf cattail and reed canary grass. Wetland 2 was an approximately 0.34 acre ditched wet meadow wetland dominated by reed canary grass. No wetland impacts are proposed for this project. A 10-foot wetland buffer is indicated on the plans. Portions of this buffer will be graded, then seeded with a native seed mix. Greenway System, Parks and Trails The Greenway System does indicate the drainage way on the west portion of the site. There are no impacts to the wetland proposed for the project, and the buffer area will be seeded with a native seed mix. No additional Greenway System measures are necessary. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Considerations The site is not within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. Drinking Water Protection The site is not within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area(DWSMA). The site will be connected to City sewer and water. Stormwater infiltration is planned. LANDSCAPE PLAN Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat,biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey was performed that identified: Total Trees Removed 37 Trees Preserved 60 Trees Planted 56 Total Trees Planted or 116 Preserved In addition to the 56 large trees planted for the site, there will be 10 trees spaded and moved, and 50 trees preserved with Tree Protection Fence. The majority of the trees planned for removal are in the Basic Use Area, not in Environmentally Sensitive Areas, and will not require mitigation trees. 5 Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. Required for 29,175 square feet of open space: 12 large trees 24 large shrubs Or 24 large trees Provided: 125 large trees Total provided trees includes 35 planted in open space and 37 existing trees along the west perimeter provide approximately 90 large trees of credit for this category. Open Areas Landscape Standards have been met. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. A 6-foot high continuous planting screen will be required for the east perimeter(along Lake Drive). This requirement will be met with a combination of 4-foot berm, trees and shrubs planted in triangulated double row, and a fence on the downslope side of the berm closer to the parking lot. Buffer and Screen Standards have been met. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards call for a minimum of 40% canopy coverage. Canopy coverage values are calculated per tree based on the anticipated size 15 years after planting, and the distance to hardscape edge from the planting location. Vehicular hardscape planned: 21,765 sq. ft. Canopy cover requirement: 8,706 sq. ft. Canopy cover provided: 7,200 sq. ft. 6 Canopy cover credit is given for 7 deciduous trees along the east parking lot perimeter and 5 deciduous trees along the perimeter of the proof of parking area. Replacing the 3 conifers on the east parking lot perimeter and 2 conifers on the proof of parking area perimeter with deciduous tree species will provide additional canopy cover credit to meet the standard. Canopy cover requirements have not been met. Foundation Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to soften and enhance building architecture, define access points, add color and seasonal interest, and to blend buildings in with the natural environment. These standards apply to building fronts and sides facing public or private streets. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 linear feet of building. These plants should be within 30 feet of the building. The following substitutions are allowable: 1 large tree= 1.5 medium or 2 small trees 1 large shrub = 1.5 medium or 3 small shrubs Also, one large tree may be substituted for every 2 large shrubs in lieu of the shrub requirement at the discretion of the City. The applicable building faces requiring foundation landscaping for this project are the north and east sides. Large Trees Large Shrubs (or equivalents) Required-North 2 6 Provided-North 2 6 Required-East 2 5 Provided-East 2 6 The north building face (the front)will have 5 large trees planted near the northwest corner of the building. This will provide the 2 large trees required, with the remaining 3 large trees substituting for the required 6 large shrubs. The east building face (along Lake Drive)will have 5 large trees planted near the southwest building corner. This will provide the 2 large trees required, with the remaining 3 large trees substituting for the 6 large shrubs. The foundation landscape requirements have been met. 7 Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The grading and landscape plans note the following cover types and quantities for disturbed areas: Sod 4,350 sf Turf at proof of parking area 6,280 sf No Mow Fescue Mix 21,805 sf Native Seeding 7,257 sf Stormwater Seeding 4,185 sf The stabilization plan includes 76% either native species or low-maintenance alternative turf varieties. This includes Mn DOT 33-261 for the stormwater basin area, a mesic prairie mix for the upland areas around the stormwater basin, and a low-maintenance fescue mix for the berm that runs along Lake Drive. A cover type should be specified for the proof of parking area. The landscape plan notes irrigation in front of buildings and boulevard areas. Lighting The purpose of the lighting requirements in the Zoning Code is to reduce light pollution, promote energy conservation, and increase night time safety, utility, security, and productivity. Lighting is reviewed by the City Planner. Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4 foot candle onto adjacent property. It appears that lighting from P 1 and the southeastern-most W2 light may exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way. This will be reviewed by the City Planner. Light fixtures are down lit and cutoff as required by city code. Recycling A trash and recycling room is noted on the site plan. 8 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the 440 Park Court Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following comments: 1. Trees that were planned for preservation on the west perimeter show grading encroaching on the Tree Protection Zones (TPZs). These trees should be removed and mitigated for if TPZs cannot be maintained at the proper dimension of 1 foot per inch Diameter at Breast Height(DBH). 2. Tree Protection Zones (TPZs)must be shown on the Grading Plan(Sheet C-201). 3. Rare plant species have been observed within a mile of the project site. A a rare plant survey must be completed, with any impact mitigation coordinated with the MN DNR. 4. Canopy cover requirements are not currently met. Replacing 5 conifers (3 on east parking lot perimeter and 2 along proof of parking area) with 5 deciduous trees will meet requirements. 5. Clarification is needed on access points for construction work. It appears that all access is planned to be through a single center drive lane. If construction traffic will access other drive lanes, they will also need construction exits. 6. A concrete washout location must be shown on the Site Plan(sheet C-101). ATTACHMENTS 1. Cover Sheet(Sheet A001) 2. Grading Plan (Sheet C-201) 3. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan(Sheet C-203) 4. Tree Preservation Plan (Sheet L-010) 5. Landscape Summary(Sheet L-101) 6. Landscape Plan (Sheet L-102) 9 cD z U Q H Z 2 ,0 E FACILITY < LINO LAKES TECH CENTER AND STORAG Of U � J O 0 O W Z ? W V O L X ZLU PARKCOURT LINOLAKES MN55014 2 ~ H LL Q O O Q ne 2 CD O Q z Uj zCn M � � Z � Z LLI O z U O A.. Q a _j M � 14 0] i {� * Z LINO LAKES � AIM s � = W .TECH C�ENT \\\1 E r o d. Z L d n w w LL ��J� o W 0 U =� Q� o Q o V U U-J 6 W N =� O o 6 r L N d N W _ C, cn nm3c z � CV V � zzzww W U Z pi wUZz Q L U Z O o p d Q W W Q N Q =w w is- SHEET INDEX DEVELOPMENT TEAM ARCHITECTURAL CIVIL OWNER APPLICANT CIVIL ENGINEER \• /' I i, / LARIAT COMPANIES INC. ELAN DESIGN LAB \ '�, / Q A001 Cover Sheet - ALTA/ NSPS Land Title Survey 8345 CRYSTAL VIEW RD STE 200 310 4TH AVE S, SUITE#1006 A011 Architectural Site Plan & Site Data C-010 Demolition Plan EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 `.\ / I `\�. ;/ '` z A012 Site Photos & Rendering C-101 Site Plan CONTACT: STEVE JOHNSTON A101 Building Floor Plan & Code Data C-201 Grading Plan BUILDING CONTRACTOR PHONE: 612-260-7982 �AMCON CONSTRUCTION SJOHNSTON@ELANLAB.COM \ I a / A301 Colored Exterior Elevations C-202 SWPPP \, C-203 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan 6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE#101 - A302 Comprehensive Signage Plan MINNETONKA, MN 55345 C-301 Utility Plan CONTACT: WAYDE JOHNSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ELAN DESIGN LAB C-501 Details PHONE: 651-379-9016 310 4TH AVE S, SUITE#1006 \ A S M O D E E ;/ ELECTRICAL C-502 Details WJOHNSON@AMCONCONSTRUCTION.COM MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 %\` ,/ I �/ �/ r CD E-0.1 Site Plan- Lighting C-503 Details CONTACT: PILAR SARAITHONG / I / / +. z � C-504 Details ARCHITECT PHONE: 612-260-7980 `\ Lr) AMCON CONSTRUCTION / W PSARAITHONG@ELANLAB.COM \ � / / Z 6121 BAKER ROAD SUITE#101 LANDSCAPE MINNETONKA, M 55345 ^ L-010 Tree Preservation Plan CONTACT: GREG KINNEY SURVEYORN � PHONE: 651-379-9021 E.G. RUD & SONS INC. L-101 Landscape Summary GKINNEY@AMCONCONSTRUCTION.COM 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110 ,\. KL M B / I,' w L-102 Landscape Plan LINO LAKES, MN 55014 \%% '� V ;/ V J L-501 Landscape Details CONTACT: JASON RUD \ TRANSPORTATION / i z Q PHONE: 651-361-8200 / / — W r 1 WWW.EGRUD.COM \. i' 0 O v / Q z S C H WA N S -------------- / m LL -- -- -- -- i �- W z 00 W L O W % O 0 O ' SCRUB ` � I 0- � BRUSH i' O Z CD BLUE HERO 40 PARK COURT ,- � J POND TORA GE -/ i ��. ELEMENTAR -/ i �� ASH, BIRCH, / ISSUES/REVISIONS: SCHOOL COTTONWOOD ' CONCEPT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 11.13.2023 MATURE TREES Site & Building Plan Submittal 01.08.2024 i I/ Response: Submittal Comments 01.26.2024 i r m • ! .• -- - ' i' RESIDENTIAL T O /f SINGLE FAMILY ASH, BIRCH, L W ' COTTONWOOD CR B I ZONING - R-6 Manufactured Home MATURE TREES ' B S / ' NB Neighborhood Busin /% , N R-X Rural Executive R Rural LB Limited Business y R-1 Single Family Residential N g GB General Business / R-1X Single Family Executive LI Light Industrial ----- R-2 Two Family Residential GI General Industrial U R-3 Medium Density Residential g y BC Business Campus � I NEW IMAGE R-4 High Density Residential PSP Public Semi-Public ' COATING R-5 High Density Residential and Business PUD Planned Unit Devel COVER SHEET a L- J —J--------------------- ------ NORTH NORTH A001 a ZONING MAP AERIAL MAP I " _ 00ff PROJECT NUMBER 21036 _J z I a n I a I 6 I GRADING NOTES — 11 T 1 11.GZ CI�T INAUT N�UT 1�1�1�%�EUNOAN C, INTRAGINGRAGINTS—FACCE.—H-1,AU.BUNR TOM— I.R. IS STARRoMBIHIT SINUS BRALL I�ITINHEAE ARROUT BEENTEATION AT ME 111111a RATE TO THE INTIS 11—G OR IMNmwTElr NOnHm. uxomnrlMPncTDmwry DalMPNacaumucrrorv,THE EncwEER AnoowrvER sxoumEE �oscwECUI=v ol TO irv�ar%eur°Prsarsixw�soeir_°csw.saacxunaamnuslau�ae�inlaecreo avaiaaciinean oma vm ,a rcoxcae0.�rlrvsruun usxuING M-1 r"axr°auwlrxxx°°rzv,. I rea rrarsAwnvIENLIae,°1111 1.nexaeU,11 xx a�� LARIAT COMPANIES INC. x. FOR NEx6TaUCTIC UIITICUIRSUIxu'aa NO,ED, xxEaorn DEaAHNaOn OFTRAxaaoRTAnox lMxoOrlarAxOAND aFEOFlCnrwrva NEWwIxGUNILTHE7LACE SOL CUSRV Ia—Too,GREATER THAN THE CMTENIA ErABUBHER WITHIN THE a FENCE,MVE BOXED off OTHER F"ED smucTURE.S. ETIICIPImafSEHOYM ON mEPENa.iHE Eaen5 aCrst—.T:1-00 IIIHI —44 a TYPE OFCONsmuarox coMP ONCNTE raox oFnRum RECONmFT"'ANCE PROOMR) TOTE mlaxms OF Au SRUNlxauscouasEsE' aED' uzlrvcI. DENT rzxpo)FomsEacsTEucErExEmExsuxE""ix�ENNEEs lxovn"uATwx,e. Av. w xDNENaxEERm HuIcaEEx saACEI w sxucxEnsEusRoaEUEo aroHE"avmm wnTER�s°Eva"sEREn'sIHOE.xaowsurE°Ea�aunu uoTs"�°w PRONDEDTO-FOR SAND ART G—FL e]as FOUND THE WORK WLL BE ATTLE BASE or FOORNSEORTL CRENEDSLAaSHAILBE CCW_EGToae PERCENTPaaxDR DRY SENUTY DWE). w oaervseromeowxea. rvswERm As urvnccEPrAELEAxDwuBE RmuIREDroBE REMOVED AND FFPucmAT no M�owED. AMCON ANDNDDasATcuMATE SE.RCLEUImxc I TO IT.1%TO.FOR DENY sa M.us B—FL BONS z uxDOmEzwxrre NCMFN,ED,SIR DOE m. TAcxcOATaxAlLconroNAroxxoorzTsrsA 1. ,s<II TTTO;EEm�;I"aD 1GUREAc'E 11T11 FUN A�"wi nx NENHICTIANGEA°MNISHwG THE11NUR11ITRFACER.WHEN : ro Esux °m O-FOR GAND ADD acursas cR VEL ata ca RuoR ACGREGATF AND IFUIlxouaTEAING.THE COST 01ALL FAILING TEa,SNAVBE B.CKCHANDERTOT MInrvET s— Assaas I I d@I - I DAS PAEVENT , RA1 Ea THE COMPOUNDSHAL APPEAR AS WHITE ASAa`--T1PAPERArmRAPPuanDrv°x THECDrvcRnE - , I I AxaaxEE-BASSEPuca Icu NCTACCEPrnELE)E�a aoxo nAu eE,soaDUARa II II/III ! jl I I\1 8EL-AvEMENTAGvGGREGATESAGE aFEET ss FOREANatscRAv ADD �a SOON ING AND END OF DGUTTERR"awIN.WHER°EWCONCREM SURNOUNDSFnnaarva ORAACUTEANYExicrwc % aRN,scT �II7r II I i aMFORCIAEaIb �DDNSCONCR CUR AND EVERr",oFr Si�E �ElowgNGID ; LINO LAKES ST:CTO�IIIII 1 J 1 I / IELOWPAVEMENTADDREGAEBASE GRAVEL Mats B EACH LOAD OF OFNERSTE WHENE REQUIRED ATASPAc"DOF,a FEET ON CURB ADDDUTFERANDON / INDUSTRIAL AND '` 7 I I om I 1 / Foacuveasµ0 Rncnau aaxrswlu eECurrDADEarH,nmETxciaEssD / 141 '; III I / 11 ,. aDEwM�BSHMUm�olxEoeExcHmoRaEDaEDroaRDVIDESAFEWONaxc°ox°m°rvs.mEfAxTEOTaTIsaOIEEv =AN RAcn°x,DlrvTsaHaLDxFITACCE—ATNDS'1"NARDFR` \ / i//// STORAGE CENTER REsaDNRSE mRACSEsx EFORCDusTRDCTINGCDNTw,cnDN 11INTSTHAT / / , / \ y/,/// ax IEIG:sumRESPo 6I IORNAMIxGTHE co"P-NTIND"DVAE ASPERsu°PAIPOFzs-11.a PREVENr mxcR6TE FRoNCRAcSIR AT OTHERtOcsnorva. cH LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA _ I 6¢DERuamis,ea-asnA)rvs� ErEcurlNG aROaEcr ExcnvATpxsusxcsnFE A/�/ i /� —I I I S. cax-OR ISRPSPORSIS.FORTHEDESIDN—OIL unrrvANDaLINFING RETENTION sysTEMG. ,aCRT IEASTecuNcrnaos.AN ADDITCH ER P aANENExr SEE DErMIs sHEErcaB,HAS BITUMINOUS ANDc°xcRErE arvEMErsEcnou SHML BE 11REaRNm FOR ECH,BD cuBIc1. OHaoRnON THEREOF. sxFFT ixRSR a NlcoxcRFm PDURSO i a i ' i I i NEroRDSDxwNME DECO,CONCRETE MN C NO DEOCPEFTIONa " o:"SOAVEFlHS a agrv° HeMLEEuamFORHANDPACESFORRmGURNANDDUTTER.SEaw,CRID s "EN ES xRF EDFmEa ESHMFaHDwND RESPONSE TO CITY AD 1VANNINGN GREATER THAN a D COMMENTS \ / / 0 /i !/ of/zs/zoza aes.D,B nur x MATcx NA- MArox nwrc H 'T. . I _ r we,� D /// i ,B m�.vnc —TOFOF BFyI2M+.25 1' J / T6^» BORRC�D ze FEEN / _ t TO I I I I I I f mew ^^\\ $ , I i , )! �OVERFLOW 901.5 � j r �NPDES AREA SUMMARY sassU o �eosAs� / / &-26'X56'BA S \ / l i I r B. IS N TDTALIMW SO T-LOSEURE LEGEND I I / AREA —..A zaW / � ,f � HEwDD,rBRDMIxDDBanvEMET� � / I 21 'I\ \ I I Ewxr DUnem,wlx°us EVFMExr m \1 1T. i CHRM E. / ' eDt / �/, concamEPAvanErvr BUILDING , E� D E S \ UMrra / ` ` 3BAYS BSB �� /j , / 310 CTH AVE SOUTH,SUITE 1006 LEE wB.w � _' / U S. N 55415 _ -- — MINN �LwwW.. .Rom r CERTIFITAT- " ------ EXPOSE OUILDING WALL FQUNDATION ` m tDwm R@°°w ;' AssHowN ----- i /% / CONSCR VDwuEeEFowD w,.aa'------ -- ------------------``_` _----- wasoTD _ r�r DATE D°r ,DD To �E -— x /x�x—x —�I- i /i / GRADING PLAN Al GRo DING PLAN below. � 1111Ec z0 fi0 ��CaII Nem,e I' mR. SCALE IN FEET LC23004 J ' ✓ c ' 8 e 1 s I a I EROSION CONTROL NOTES ..NFA RRPFEIRENCEONLr. ------ -- I oUE used FOR ALL orvsmucnaxsTNNrvc nrvosnEu T LARIAT COMPANIES INC. 8G48 Crys[a' RE.p3DO ENGINEERED FIBER 1-1 ANDSEEDED AS FPEGFIEO Etlen Pra nne 34l --._RA_ 1`Cr --- ,_- - wEsa�ENrUEocxEcx DAMsuevECE,IATaxIs oRE \\ \\ r/fir' 'v _ `=3 ��:.� / REMGVED. sI°°fcaAoraLf FlLTEN LOC DOEsxoT HEED 'AMCONca \ ,\ 4y --- � 'cpq v U noun DFca., oNn oEFGx oR,DArso"x r' \ _ RovIDE,EMPDRAN. / -------- -- __'�' \ " --___ ;s COpt -'x�\\ "R `.V s. DEFEarosxEETC. DAAD-ONALSIPPF RLDIIREUEx,s MINNET R A553a5 — / N EFERTO THE,AR SCAPEPLANFORFINALREVIGETAnON �i .3�g;' - -- �� \ °--- REDUIREMExrs - c SPEG'_UNz LINO LAKES Ga UNLSSN D,ING RGORE. ANCESPER E INDUSTRIAL AND w. R MlrvlNum.m[�wfafr nDOPMnrx'm GADG inonu ERasax STORAGE CENTER \ \\ ,/ / '�_/ �� I ;•.') / mEcrTNESREAND NNNTNNVIMPLMNCE LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA / 8 SHEET ixoEx TO THE ABSOLUTE NINIMUM REGUIREDTG CDMPLETE \`, -,i / I / ✓:•:•:•::• 7x RRAGSHOKNONTHESEPLIS. RESPONSE TO CITY •. �1' � I: •• LEGEND COMMENTS ��i�✓�l® �iih i %/ i:.:::: // 01/25/2024 1 1 I I l ii/i�`I ! IV II I ��I j / ✓�, �..�..� ITIENCE TREEPROT pI�I I �l I I\/ II 1 ✓�f• / RUTP�ERRDGSPUMIRNT—TROL 11NSTRUINCIN uMne � Il n i � I I 1 \I l i•r :. II 'q� / 1•/: Ih I/ ,I 1 I I I !'✓ ::.'.• As xnEOE ATE O — TREE / 11/111 I 11 I 1 1 II I / ✓ :::. ITMA / soosu"DscnPE SEEL m'mecn°x G, 1I 11 r^ I 1 0 Ill I I III I /I I II / I •••' TUBE AT PROOF of PARXIxc j \ f✓,,•:•' NOU/ eDUE8NEEPFESCUE,aEwINGS LT cn°n /�� v �Ci��..�•t:•: - xC °G GOER EITI ✓ RCGT GSOUT H PDA osiucn NTRAry TER! 1 R FENCE EeoPwwEssxw uI / v - GEEGING UP..."Ita.. I. INLET TEcnON IxLe ErnO i /"' ..i ::'•'�' / "fILTRAnON PARNS1 Tcx M, 7 mPl y / 4IL7 N. III ,� /i -_ __ IIPRA PML��AE '� \ ��'• :•r•• / B.-28'X56'BAYS \\I /::•. / E JazSNIC vEc nods I •.•✓:.:.•.•: / lGm:(m1Em �'; •'A': / nLTe IN ETPR Cnax •7••' �// 330 ATH AVE SOUTH, 1006 a. f, ,Loc ITrPI c� /F/ f• 9 / G s. N 5541s /i,•,. '.7.'...':: / ' , sfx.aco.Tsso IL G[ MEcx !';• .'.�:f�•..':::•//�/' ti� / nLeo.T www..iaai.e.rom BUILDING / i CEBTIIICATI.N 3 BAVS :'��' ;• i' o / a�aM�amlvrvmm'�:day �a•rewn t1/�I 1 l+l / ________� •.'Y, /r � _ / pweianaativ- P Taiga 7 / \ \ I�t'•' I // :. EROSION—"I NDGT ETM .. N ! 1 I s-_ \\ ���.... ---CATEGDR.zoNVPl..-.. 'y'•'' a CO -------------- �--�� 4d --_ ENC �\ :... - rF,tte�ti-J •::.•:.I:.::•:; . / sxEET , T / I r-- � / < •••••�•'•'•:••••••••• �� / / EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN E%ISIING eDILDIN. PKIFTINGBIIILDING / / C-203 Al/EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN X n.er below. O 30 90 PxD,EC rvO. -30 C Call d[N. SCALE IN FEET AMC23004 Nemr J f L� I 3 < 1 s / I s I TREE PRESERVATION NOTES owNEA I r sf LARIATCOMPANIES INC. T ESE,SHRUES.AND—IGIN—NE NOTED.ON— 34l tl P INEGG + ------ -- �\ ` '_ \ UM FGAAE°GIx�xEa EMEMµG FNANaALPENA . TGRBRES GR - ` An°wxsNERED'LosTRERrxEam srnnDArms AMCON ___ C�\nl = Z E LINGGRA°ING ALINRIES FENGNGroBEPNSIISO AND BEGNEIRE ♦, ,fl1�5!< / / <— �� `M=!�� mEEE ANCUNGTE1SEE DW-E AT MINNET ATEI55305 ADISrANLENFFEiOFl30M O 91GxN93TBEPIACEoucNG FENCEro FAOXIBrtfl+AOING i , i a .XEffxcfuxfsMUN.axffucfsfaxuulwraxof -- SEEDING Rw�"w�FrvNCE�G'Gl of"s�i OFFFFsneiOFroarnNo PA°,Ec. --___ - -- \� iii _\ r * / OMA,E�MEHI NEgOREGUIPMENTDANSESTGRED—IN LINO LAKES 3 TxETaE Ecn° EAs INDUSTRIAL AND /r °^ "ems�n BE G N EGFTxEGTEAL,_71DxPExMI.. STORAGE CENTER v s ssURMEYINcw°ING SNAMPSMcxEERRY Rusus LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA oT uwst�sxAu aEcanPIE,Eoe11RTOAursrtEwoRx. GsuBMITARERMNFRan MluxFsoTAGxF,.FMv IHIIT .y TELE»IEANOOIDEA NFOUND s NAMIILEOFT PRaECIsrtc Mx GxRA HAS aFENFoux°"'lUE-11FORHEEG SPECIE IN a MG�9EP G RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS / LEGEND 01/25/2024 1 FOR MATCONICGC.ETN • / // 0 pxous,aum AR°uxG 9ulwxcnvFXlcuuRx+RGarwaEl wGrrnnONCxrARING REMovETREE T IvoaH_,Mnuellcu RooTZGNE CONSMUCIRONLIMITS ,Ecip1 FENCE GFEGHEFL3 s ON NON py� � TRGcjW /p' gREM� uN 11HY / � r r sEE3HEET i_i,I NF_L_,GNE « !/------ - - ------------------ --- - - - - 4122 /TREE PRESERVATION SUMMARY I PPP / NON Ex AREAIESAI vlaoNMExrAuvsENsmvE RENNARGO REGUIREG RM7HIN SAM C use AREA 11 TRee3 - ' NG - UYTREES /1 P i Y / >tzoEClGu0u4 m1GN1—Ul 1111 xrREE3'I REMOVER=1xiREE3 1xmEES CGTQ Pot 10 « w a� / .sEEsxF£i L-Io1 fORTHEEMNMI.ON �V EYLS..p1•YG.N.o..E.p ,E>,VpE 1 G ------ «7s/N L—TREERfM—F.TREE3.s-FICEGINOMFG-C. 3304Tx AVE 50UTH�SUITE loot 5415 gel ______ \ �f 1RMPOGSTPNDn 163.360., I wW..Na n om I P a / E 11 CALCUL NR NeAsrvsuNceSIRASLEmEEI u�So.r P u P 1�1 —___ / 'ULu T E0.EANa UNF-1 CEx TIFICAA*I*" POti12 —INGAING US,_ FO AREARSPAOm TREES �> Q� y\M / ioiu 11 REMOVED TREES GO-]S REMOVED TREES nerebyo�Natmis pan was�repareaeyma.w M. NIFEROUE M..MNW.PC OF P °° NLMDOD C m� 1 'ELM REMOVED-TREE / / RGPULu3 EAT°Nx°.<.R,s x, . y. I I NttwltlronLxulS_------ _ Q/^ ` 9 Izrovuws IHEET a , rr — I —BO%DO / POP1 ' / G I �R I '- - `� TREE PRESERVATION X1fi o --- //J / 1:iPPOPUW6 PLAN �'- EASLUNG BUILDING E STINGENILDING . L-01 0 A1'TREE PRES ION PLAN L i io Go PR°,EI "°. R"Calltie ,udlg. GALE IN FEET LC23004 J ' m ' s '_ 4 1 s I 6 I . �� rr •-_•P •••••` _ �°. ri'•- •�- •• ++•P •� LANDSCAPE SUMMARY BEAREA - °E -..' _ '� � �4�RT••`\ - °°; --.''r — ` �•Q/;R;••\ IrvaieiwnLSVARNuxosunDING&VEHcww xnuecnaE LARIAT COMPANIES INC. I • +t— I I • h— aosEo E 834sx •,a G,,t.IV.Rd-OO x\ %%� x ••E° `v i% x ••S cw11—R 111 pEVS -11 ®O � SF x�I • arE • ` • a//H • FGUNDA GNA HE TFULKSTEET cDNER PROPOSED DPLAG,rGE AH�RDINGwEI AMCON DUE II i' • "4 !,)®. • suRCETEEs.,DU�E=„DEE=4TREEs 0 11—TREEsrvnxc 6121 N,INNET A55345 / I eIARCEsxRUxw,UU1F.,:e1F.,DUREsxwxs o,UURGEsxRUis �'"s�°'° I M�I PEN AREAS IA j ' •�•� I'Y i I •�•�° ,'OUTSIDE 29175 SF s P1D1ET FOUxn - M 7Eps "" L INO LAKES,uRDETE.1-1.,3TEES z�Er-1 1Ew • INDUSTRIAL AND ' G.• f _ I / =: RURs O'R . ' s6iixGDiREEssuRCESHRw1ISG11 EMKsTE ° STORAGE CENTER sEEERes EE_ LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA p/� • � e HIGH SCREEN.COMBINATION of BERM eKEEN 4ncn eERm,e mxPavEErvcfe iI F_ ss'ECIU D SRPaA IK) SHEET NOES 1 LARGE TREVe aF(DR MEDIUM LF.ORsmnuC5LF) suxcETREEs RESPONSE TO CITY s DUEE (TEES N�11NDUS 3DNED COMMENTS ' INDUSTRIAL 01/25/2024 FEE RE—MENT TOTu aROPOSEns,TREES(2)0000 ♦i 2 ' / I — -- /! 2 , / SEE SHEET—FOR TREE PRESERVAnON Pux `../^a'� u,DTREES PLANT SCHEDULE m NNAm SCIENHHEN-1 SIE MSNEE NO C1 CANOPYCOVER C3 FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE GLEIDUCLOTREES ' SIENN oa sRENXFREEMANH 20 CAL Rah 4sxxis NNA `` rrr +'PAp„ •••.� 44° /ri r/ +,(xAp�•••,`•,� s GUS m CAL - suxxss i °° c� �o,ar, °a•+--'' ��"h�O�R; CUP DETREE mN rNER ` I Imo•, Y I I • %% 1 •a \ _ '/I%• x!f� +,� RD6UGTA D R RDRUR. x DENGH :A R66 aHxis Td a a% 1E R /Im . ao 6PAOE0, E6 FROM!PHASE I cONGmucnON w« / 0 1 )I T 1ury PFnusv RaxlwA alrt.R. sea 4oHx, I • ,a CAN rvDRsmucE ncFAA DEREA wAr ARE axr. eeR ssHxe c / i/ ,' •� T exr. Ees —2 r� SPAU ) I ,'I-161 .6" — II "®z� /� I•j / ,OS 3104TH AVE SOUTH SUITE 1006 10 ONY vD C ENTALm 3GAL. Po arx6 i , , sax.aso Tsw Ilwww e'Ian ae mom R AE 7E HNY' CERT F CAi oN SHE O x DocwooD P uGEwH.E.o m,—cr ,GAL POT 4xx4 �amdr�mrmmm':FNPwas Preremae.ma.• '± Q ,e EPucEsxxue NaTcx Ensnxc PUT3cu. T m•mxyESpiyy\r G.N�Q su3smunorvs x �R� / U_ET GONS f DATE „D PoGRET CA ANDpRNNNOMAGE,Hox D H 11AAMEPE EEs . s T I LANDSCAPE , i e T OJCC4 OJOJD it � / I � / / SUMMARY / .... T � L-101 Al OPEN AREA LANDSCAPE A3 BUFFER&SCREEN LANDSCAPE • '111Ec ND. O 30 e0 'eG =6O x Hera below. SCALE lu FEET AMC23004 P•Call 6•m,.w�d�N. J ' I s e 1 6 I 6 I LANDSCAPE NOTES w Pos°5nry suREAD DEMNA Hsui"iwLCONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE OEcnvEFaaEncLnnosicisi° LI — ,\ / IxmsOwTELvxonEvuxWCAPEAacxnEcr EORREsoLlmOx. LARIAT COMPANIESOO ® / 8346 ,iF,RlYew RE.MM00 �i? ® oxsru MATBSr"'"'TArvorneaRDARDS M P 3µ w r�` f/R q° Z OxEAULHLANT AIATBEMA1'1Oq YNAFIIRSKK'OU. Tie Mi so oM lu $ a AMCON Y _ 4---��--------- 'O k x I� �a, ,4 ---fix— x—�•_ _ c AR ° urourHcuRRs .""cE"""rs l"PRwERSPACINCEouowxc I ' MIxxET A663A5 ,tr 1 I y C. y '\X '•cz / mnRow x As�EFDA rPLANTREsroPwTON lAYTERQUA nAND ,Ra,ecr nLTRAnW Purvnxc. ronDo11RIOULATORg�"RsnEiICOMPo6FUEN tes°UDo DL LINO LAKES i % 1x/nv DE �a�Ea �R-haa E,`2D TER DF—EMS INDUSTRIAL AND OF—�xG LIBELSRA aEs xanEDrOADEP DF<•aE DRE FFEAT, STORAGE CENTER a \ \ / EExueNx NODE6PxuL LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA \ TiwIORTOixiaaoNE%YMATEN—E70 FACUTAIE co u sOl IOnnON PRIoaroPlnrvTxc.W xorovEAT MP T L. 1—T INDEX HAR ODBAR MULDH pNWEsaezo PErI. "IPP HAM"RMILLO SCR'"°ER.TME° D RESPONSE TO CITY ® i i MP0SVIC1.TNT MATERIAL SHALL �xgKNS—'orco:uNEO IAULY FREE OF ROLE SIR EMMEUST x COMMENTS MATNUFACTURESSOSO NETUNNES ATR`aN o-TICUEBORa°µo"RoM'M of/zs/zoza I / nro1CCAwaR OARIS RFATFnwooD.iNE MATEMu ° SHAM 11TCE-GROUNDO 2 INCHES SNVgHENgON—xOWDMDwL aIE.CI REPLACEss ® // 11LE DATE B.I / MlOUo�rloNCHDEEHHOF�o�DE°IlANDTACCERMA MUCH INPa<I E F N HEC IxuM EOciry c D srANE.uL EnGI c o REWMMER GRAGE./ / 10.APPLY FOURwI INCH DEPTH OFSUREDDEDHAR—C DARK MUL CH lx —s;—ro. .PnVMULcxxAPPLYPREENT DE A NGBED / I 6xlsnrvcTRF6sasn 3s .APPLEGATiOx'R°A;E,C F1.MARCEnURE°,PHDHIaruxEO TREEEavnnory ® / Ao uxMsc.ArEwil°iRnMi,`oAroRa u�°AuwSEMsn;NONE ® , I w sN E .b .,MREEISIxDRDEp1110EZJIrvo,rRAPROc.MDLDHOVEawEEO EMENT6IFR FAERX:IN MPINTENNICEMEAa IND104TEO0N PLAH. I SEE snEEr / RR PLANE / _ RASTINC46C.PROWCrsrOEnmTc°rnPAxvaR API �' SON EFOvmWW LARDSCAPE PLAN TO BE INsrna arLnrvWcea6 AxOREwwAG wAu RR / AcrOR.soorosEMNWT O 0 Ir O 38—DENSE l.—oA MCAIEM MRE EASE orwFEwnrvD DxEASE.=MIwMUM sixl1l1.1—AT ErxE n DH)1lxcxEAEFFORELAYN sc OE.oNCAPECOMLVRWTEO ooEDMULAS x HSAuxvWx . C / i kuu, PE USTReEE — n I � c L / Mwxccao�oREOUIREMENTs. EruWmAxo srnre \ ,.I,R •/ � "R. Fi00 ; Iso,HEawlusErvm�EOEruls EORAUIxsruun0x,uxLEssTu"w xcE m aAnreu /mP) L , / C.HO.ONETWHNANO2TUT OMEN VYIER Is MMrv,E c6srRIP �Pw / =FNrv[Isrsx'AR`—'T'-'C=":TL E�aIU MSAIi['— IG„N.c... � NAN mP,E D ENNE-110-1IxOrEAR 310 CTH AVE SOUTH,SUITE 51006 ________ Emcuxm EEHCE 0 �, / LEGEND I L`""'".`�'"ae mom , / _=_=__=-" W �.r roR O o o �DR...OF aIT ATIw°s" �sPre�ax.�a Al , L° _ o TURF AT PROOF OF PANNING F. aNeol� NOM—NSEEDING2UlC5GE. �.MIx%0ROCNX — RAGE xgIptAM / i NESEENINE1 A'. CONS APAO EE / -a, mP,e,R / ® STORM—SEEDING4IE6sF. mEE aEPucEMErvr D SHEET LPLAN FIR ` REMisrxAnox nD.asoss D�uavea \ — PRESFmAnWSON FIR / — EMING FENCE suMMurr / / sxEET j SEE GHEkT-1 WRSEE TRCHEDUL sEEsnFETL Io,FORPwrt scnEWIE I LANDSCAPE PLAN exlanxG BUILDING ExxONG aMILDING : L-102 Al LANDSCAPE below. O30 90 PRO,EC NO. No Calltiemrew HC seALE IU FEET AMC23004 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: February 281h, 2024 REQUEST: Motion on Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List for 2024 TOPIC: Environmental Board Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List-2"d Draft BACKGROUND The Environmental Board serves to provide aid and advice to the Council in its efforts to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between people and their environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and stimulate the health and welfare of people; to enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the city; to advise the city in the use and management of its natural resources in order to preserve and enhance the environmental amenities for present and future residents, and to improve and ensure a lasting quality of life within the city(City Code Chapter 217.01). Each year, the Environmental Board prepares an annual work plan that will be presented to the City Council for approval. This plan includes a list of initiatives concerning current environmental issues in the major areas of focus of the Environmental Board, including wildlife, forestry, natural resources, water, and solid waste management. Staff also prepares a list of ongoing tasks to highlight the distinction between the Annual Work Plan and standard operating procedures/ongoing tasks. The first draft of these lists were reviewed at the January 31", 2024 Environmental Board meeting. Staff has incorporated Board comments into the second draft that is under review tonight. When the Board has approved the Annual Work Plan, it will be presented to the City Council for their consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTION Staff is seeking Environmental Board approval of the Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List for 2024. Staff recommends approval of these documents. 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. Environmental Board Annual Work Plan 2024 2. Environmental Board Ongoing Tasks List 2024 2 Environmental Board Annual Work Plan 2024 General 1. Continue to review proposed development projects and provide recommendations to the City Council. The recommendations are based upon compliance with the landscaping section of the Zoning Ordinance, and current accepted practices on topics including urban forestry,natural resource conservation,water quality,utilizing native plants where feasible, and protecting wildlife. 2. Improve and enhance environmental content on the City website, social media, and the local newspaper. 3. Promote workshops on water conservation, alternative lawn cover types, and native plants on the city website and social media platforms. Wildlife 1. Continue to support wildlife through utilizing the Natural Heritage Information System to identify rare, endangered,threatened, and special concern species and provide recommendations to minimize impacts to these species and improve habitat. 2. Promote the use of native plants to benefit pollinators and other organisms. 3. Work to improve existing natural areas on City land through restoration efforts with City and volunteer staff. 4. Support the heron rookery on Peltier Island. Forestry 1. Continue implementation of the City's Emerald Ash Borer response. This includes removal of boulevard trees and replacement with a diverse mix of species,a partnership with Rainbow Tree Care to offer a discount rate on private tree injections, and continued removals of ash trees in natural areas and parks. 2. Promote tree planting through the City tree sale and Anoka Conservation District seedling sale. Natural Resources 1. Review proposed changes to Landscaping Ordinance as part of the zoning ordinance update. 2. Support the pursuit of additional opportunities for wetland banks and other natural areas. 3. Improve the Greenway System and expand connectivity of greenspace in development projects. Water 1. Continue to improve educational outreach materials on water conservation,both on the city website and in newsletters. Continue the smart irrigation controller program. Promote the Drive for 75 water conservation initiative. 2. Increase outreach on smart chloride use (deicing salt)use for both residents and commercial properties. Recycling/Solid Waste 1. Identify ways to increase recycling tonnage. This may include expansion of the organics program, addition of programs to accept materials not currently included in city programs, and coupons for items dropped at Recycling Saturdays. Environmental Board Ongoing Tasks List 2024 General 1. Promote environmental stewardship through participation in the Earth Day event held at Wargo Nature Center,Blue Heron Days, and other City and local events. Wildlife 1. Continue to support wildlife through promotion of native plants;promoting the Greenway System and connectivity of habitat;utilizing Natural Heritage Information System to identify protection measures specific to rare,threatened, endangered, and special concern species; restore existing natural areas on City land with the aid of City and volunteer staff; and minimizing habitat impacts where feasible. 2. Monitor the heron rookery on Peltier Lake. Collaborate with volunteers and Anoka County on work to benefit the herons, including flashing trees,performing an annual nest count, managing invasive species such as buckthorn,and planting trees to replace the many ash trees on the island that will succumb to emerald ash borer. Forestry 1. Continue to enhance the urban forest through education and outreach,participation in the Tree City USA program,boulevard tree management and inventory updates, diseased tree management, and the City tree sale. Natural Resources 3. Perform maintenance on conservation easements and wetland bank areas as time and budget permit. Water 1. Collaborate with Rice Creek Watershed District,Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization, and other agencies to promote water conservation,water quality improvements/protections,and native plantings through outreach materials,workshops,and webinars. 2. Distribute outreach and education materials on water conservation,water quality, and stormwater management. 3. Continue to protect water resources through stormwater management, ensuring construction site compliance,and stormwater pollution protection plan reviews. Recycling/Solid Waste Management 1. Participate in and promote monthly Recycling Saturday events. 2. Strive to achieve recycling tonnage goals. 3. Monitor organics sites to determine service levels and potential program expansion needs. 4. Continue to distribute outreach materials related to recycling and organics in collaboration with Anoka County.