HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-12-2018 Council Meeting Packet EXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 12, 2018
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Councilmembers Maher, Manthey, Rafferty and Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
SPECIAL COUNCIL SESSION, 5:15 P.M.
Interview Advisory Board Applicants – Council Work Room
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA), 6:15 P.M.
See separate agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Roll Call - Council Members Rafferty, Stoesz, Manthey, Maher, and Mayor Reinert were
present
Pledge of Allegiance
Open Mike / Public Comment - none
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
The agenda was approved as presented
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Lou Masonick – Recognition Award – EDAC Member February 2010 – December 2017
& Planning & Zoning Board Member February 2012 – December 2017
Emily Parker – Special City of Lino Lakes Recognition Award
& American Legion presentation
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 12, 2018 (Check No. 107597 through 107688) in the
amount of $381,879.35.
B) Consider approval of January 22, 2018 Work Session Minutes
C) Consider approval of January 22, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve
Consent Agenda Items 1A through 1C as presented was adopted
Council Agenda -2- February 12, 2018
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 18-11, Authorizing the Issuance of 2018 Certificates of
Indebtedness, Sarah Cotton
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Stoesz, to approve Resolution
No. 18-11, as presented was adopted
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Appointment of Parks Maintenance Worker, Jeff Karlson
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Manthey, to approve the
appointment of Taylor Drahota, as recommended was adopted
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution 18-12, Authorizing Construction Activity in Support of Target
Remodel, John Swenson
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Manthey, to approve Resolution
No. 18-12, as amended to change construction dates to February 20th & 21st was
adopted
B) Consider Approval of the Sale of Fire Rescue Pumper and Deposit of Proceeds,
John Swenson
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Stoesz, to approve the sale as
recommended, was adopted
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Public Hearing: Consider Ordinance No. 02-18, Vacating Drainage and Utility
Easement Lot 15, Block 2 of NorthPointe 2nd Addition, Diane Hankee \
Action Taken: Motion by Stoesz, seconded by Manthey, to approve the 1st
Reading of Ordinance No. 02-18, as presented was adopted
B) Pavement Management Program, Diane Hankee
i. Consider Resolution 18-13, Accepting 2017 Pavement Management Report
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve Resolution
No. 18-13, as presented was adopted
ii. Consider Resolution 18-14, Authorize the Preparation of Plans and
Specifications, 2018 Mill and Overlay Project
Action Taken: Motion by Maher, seconded by Rafferty, to approve Resolution
No. 18-11, as presented was adopted
Council Agenda -3- February 12, 2018
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. on a motion by Rafferty, seconded by Stoesz
Following adjournment of the regular council meeting, a closed meeting of the EDA will be
in the Council Work Room regarding Legacy Land Sale Negotiations
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead
February 12, 2018 through February 26, 2018
Monday, February 19 CLOSED PRESIDENTS’ DAY
Monday, February 26 5:00 pm, Council Work Room Interview Bd Applicants
Monday, February 26 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session
Monday, February 26 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 22, 2018
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : January 22, 2018 4
TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 6:25 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7
Manthey, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 11
Swenson; City Engineer Diane Hankee; City Clerk Julie Bartell. 12
13
1. Public Safety Department Quarterly Update – Public Safety Director Swenson 14
reviewed a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation is on file. 15
16
Highlighted: 17
- Medical call numbers are driven by services to the city’s assisted living facilities; 18
Director Swenson explained that he is researching further the data on those calls; 19
Mayor offered comments regarding the need to careful plan for additional senior 20
facilities into the future; 21
- Mutual aid given and received; 22
- Regarding criminal offense numbers, Director Swenson noted that the numbers 23
could be in flux based on changing factors; 24
- Increase in domestic assaults; discussions underway to work in that area; 25
- DWI is up probably just because of more stops; the department is working toward 26
utilizing forfeiture funds for a safe ride home program for residents; 27
- Clearance rate is high and that indicates good work by the department staff; 28
- Notable events. 29
30
The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 31
32
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 33
February 12, 2018. 34
35
36
37
38
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 39
40
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES 1
MINUTES 2
3
DATE : January 22, 2018 4
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 5
TIME ENDED : 7:55 p.m. 6
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Maher, 7
Manthey, Stoesz and Mayor Reinert 8
MEMBERS ABSENT : 9
10
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Director of 11
Public Safety John Swenson; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 12
13
PUBLIC COMMENT 14
15
No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 16
17
SETTING THE AGENDA 18
19
The agenda was approved as presented. Administrator Karlson noted that the closed meeting 20
scheduled after the meeting has been cancelled due to weather. 21
22
SPECIAL PRESENTATION 23
24
The special presentation was postponed to February 12. 25
26
CONSENT AGENDA 27
28
Council Member Stoesz moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1F as presented. 29
Council Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 30
31
ITEM ACTION 32
33
Consideration of Expenditures: 34
35
January 22, 2018 (Check No. 107489 – 36
107596, $502,645.01) Approved 37
38
January 2, 2018 Council Work Session Minutes Approved 39
40
January 8, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes Approved 41
42
Consider Resolution No. 18-06, Authorizing Issuance 43
Of a Special Event Permit to hold the annual Snow 44
Golf Event at Trapper’s Bar & Grill Approved 45
46
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
2
Consider Resolution No. 18-07, Authorizing Issuance 47
Of a Special Event Permit to hold the annual Centennial 48
Lions Ice Fishing Contest on Centerville Lake Approved 49
50
Consider Resolution No. 18-08, Approving a Peddler 51
License for Edward Jones Financial Approved 52
53
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 54
55
There was no report from the Finance Department. 56
57
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 58
59
3A) Consider Resolution No. 18-09, Approving an On-Sale Liquor with Sunday Sales 60
License for Katana Sushi - City Clerk Bartell reported that the city has received an application for 61
an On-Sale with Sunday Sales liquor license for a new restaurant called Katana Sushi that plans to 62
open about March 1 at 730 Apollo Drive. Their application process is complete, the related fees have 63
been paid and insurance information has been provided to the City as required. In accordance with 64
the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances, this application requires approval by the City Council. 65
66
Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 18-09 as presented. Council Member 67
Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 68
69
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 70
71
There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 72
73
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 74
75
There was no report from the Public Services Department. 76
77
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 78
79
6A) Public Hearing: West Shadow Lake Area Municipal Utility Extension – City Engineer 80
Diane Hankee reviewed a PowerPoint presentation that included information on the following: 81
82
- Map showing project area; 83
- Neighborhood meeting was held at which details were discussed; 84
- Staff is ready to submit permits to watershed and Army Corps of Engineers; 85
- Council will receive an update on designs at next work session; 86
- With roadway project under consideration, it is appropriate to consider the addition of 87
municipal utilities; the area includes some aged systems; 88
- Review of proposed improvements; 89
- Water and sewer lines proposed drawn on a map; 90
- Project costs; 91
- Assessment analysis; 92
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
3
- Other costs (city trunk connection fee, Met Council Environmental Services fee and cost to 93
connect to house from property line); 94
- Survey Results reviewed; 95
- Project schedule and process reviewed, including petition period of 60 days. 96
97
Council Member Rafferty noted that some additional costs were pointed out in the presentation. Ms. 98
Hankee explained the portion that the city pays, the amounts assessed and the ability for people to 99
choose to hook up right away or later. The additional costs would be assessed, with a payment 100
period available. Council Member Rafferty recommends that staff give residents as much 101
information as possible about their exposure to costs. Mayor Reinert suggested that proposed costs 102
could be compared to past proposed costs for this project and he believes they would overall be lower 103
cost to the residents. 104
105
Mayor Reinert opened the public hearing. 106
107
Greg Olson, 6916 West Shadow Lake Drive, longtime resident. He originally purchased a lot and 108
had to attend a Planning and Zoning Board meeting at which problems with building were brought 109
up. That was 1982 and at that time they were assured that sewer and water was going to be put in. 110
Additionally the road is in terrible condition. The numbers are high but he recognizes that the work 111
must be done. He thanks the council for moving this forward. 112
113
Lynn Francis, 6961 West Shadow Lake Drive, asked about the additional cost to bring the services to 114
the home. Ms. Hankee said there will be different situations based on settings; she predicts that the 115
cost will be between $5,000 and $10,000. Mayor Reinert remarked that each time this is discussed, 116
there can be some sticker shock but later on those numbers continue to go up. 117
118
The council asked if the value of the home will reflect the cost of these improvements and several 119
residents said they believe so. 120
121
Council Member Manthey remarked that he has public water and sewer and has been told by realtors 122
that the value is there. 123
124
Marg Penn, 7002 West Shadow Lake Drive, asked if there is any chance that the city could have 125
residents get work done in aggregate to get better prices and Ms. Hankee said that is possible. 126
127
Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court. Mr. Trehus remarked that deciding the project is up to the city 128
council and the residents of the area. That means that the minority must live with the majority’s 129
decision. He reviewed costs that he’s heard. He noted his research on grinder pumps and sewer 130
costs. He noted that he has brought information to share on good septic systems which can be very 131
low cost to operate and very reliable. He also provided information on water services. He noted 132
that the neighborhood has a big decision to make. He stated that they do not need municipal water 133
but he is acceptable to the sewer services. Based on his question, there was also discussion about 134
areas where the water will be extended. Mayor Reinert said he isn’t convinced at this point that the 135
extension is needed and continues to receive data. 136
137
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
4
John Bergeson, 6996 West Shadow Lake Drive, spoke in support of extending sewer and water. He 138
is thankful for the road improvements and it makes no sense to put the road in without the sewer and 139
water. One point that has been missed is that if you have a functioning well and sewer, you don’t 140
have to hook up to municipal utilities; you can keep the well and septic if they are maintained. He 141
feels that hooking up does make a positive difference when it comes time to sell a home. 142
143
Charles Puskas, 6994 West Shadow Lake Drive. He thanked Ms. Hankee for working with the 144
neighborhood; she has fielded a lot of questions and discussed a lot of concerns. He supports the 145
direction this is going and he encourages the council to proceed with the project. 146
147
Donnell Hansen, 6710 West Shadow Lake Drive. She has a newer septic system but she respects 148
other’s needs and desires. She wants to know if people with septic systems will be asked to change. 149
Ms. Hankee said that septic systems must be compliant to remain. A building official determination 150
may be involved. Mayor Reinert said it’s an important question. He feels that having a 151
noncompliant system would probably mean the system would have to be replaced anyway. People 152
should be able to know as much about that as possible ahead of the project. Council Member Maher 153
discussed with staff the threshold of “failure” that would be used. 154
155
Council Member Rafferty said he assumes that new development would be required to connect to 156
utilities; staff concurred. He also noted the survey numbers presented; it seems that only 33 people 157
responded out of 73 158
159
Pete Anderson, 6769 West Shadow Lake Drive, reported that he moved to the street in May. While 160
he did answer no to getting both utilities, he has heard the argument in favor of sewer. He has a 161
young family including four children and the cost is a big concern for him. He thinks he will have 162
costs even if he doesn’t connect and down the line he knows there will be a connection requirement. 163
He also asked if this improvement will impact his property taxation as well. City Administrator 164
Karlson said he will check with the city assessor. The council said all information should be shared 165
with all interested parties. 166
167
There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. 168
169
6B) Public Hearing: LaMotte Area Water System Extension – City Engineer Hankee 170
reviewed a PowerPoint presentation that including information on: 171
- Project area reviewed on a map; 172
- Neighborhood meeting was held and roadway components were reviewed; sanitary sewer 173
improvement and repair is already included in the project; 174
- There is a proposed water system extension included (shown on a map); 175
- Overall costs reviewed (utility); 176
- Proposed assessments were reviewed; other costs (trunk utility connection and cost of 177
connection from property line to house); 178
- Survey results; 179
- Proposed project schedule. 180
181
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
5
Council Member Stoesz asked about a delayed connection (such as someone connecting in Year 12) 182
and impact on how long someone would pay. Ms. Hankee said the cost would be whatever the city 183
charges for connection are at that time. 184
185
Mayor Reinert opened the public hearing. 186
187
Ms. Hankee presented a comment that was submitted in writing. Richard and Emily Biske, 1559 188
LaMotte Circle (letter on the file). Mayor Reinert recalled that in the past the issue of connection 189
would be forced by the city with certain road improvements. That situation has been reconsidered 190
and the forced element is no longer present. When a road is improved is decidedly a good time to 191
install utilities but he doesn’t believe in pushing things on people. He doesn’t see the interest here. 192
193
Joe Cameron, 1572 LaMotte Circle. He feels the neighborhood doesn’t want water. Will a petition 194
be required? Ms. Hankee said she’s received a few calls from the LaMotte area for the petition form. 195
Within 60 days the neighborhood can submit a petition. 196
197
Bernard Ward, 1549 LaMotte Drive. He is vehemently opposed to the water improvement. He 198
agrees with the roadway. To put water in where people don’t want it is foolish. He will sign the 199
petition and he feels the overwhelming majority of residents do not want the water. They have great 200
water. 201
202
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:49 p.m. 203
204
6C) SS Properties Addition/All Seasons Rental (7932 Lake Drive) Drainage and Utility 205
Easement Vacation – City Engineer Hankee reviewed the written staff report. This a requested 206
second reading of the ordinance. Council Member Stoesz asked there has been any phone calls or 207
other communication in opposition to this vacation; Ms. Hankee said no. 208
209
i) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 01-18, Vacating Drainage and Utility 210
Easement for Lot 1, Block 1 of Pine Glen 211
212
Council Member Rafferty moved to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 01-18 as presented. 213
Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 214
215
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 01-18 216
as presented. Council Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried; Yeas, 5; Nays none. 217
218
ii) Consider Resolution No. 18-05, Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance 219
No. 01-18 220
221
Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 18-05 as presented. Council Member 222
Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 223
224
6D) SS Properties Addition/All Seasons Rental (7932 Lake Drive) – City Engineer Hankee 225
reviewed the written staff report. 226
227
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
6
i) Consider Resolution No. 18-03, Approving the Final Plat; 228
229
Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 18-03 as presented. Council Member 230
Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 231
232
ii) Consider Resolution No. 18-04, Approving Development Agreement. 233
234
Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 18-04 as presented. Council Member 235
Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 236
237
UNFINISHED BUSINESS 238
239
There was no Unfinished Business. 240
241
NEW BUSINESS 242
243
There was no New Business. 244
245
COMMUNITY CALENDAR EVENTS 246
247
18TH ANNUAL SNOW DAY - This is a FREE event that will be held on Saturday, January 27 at 248
Wargo Nature Center from 1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Ice Fishing, cross country skiing, kicksledding, 249
snowshoeing and more. For more information contact the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation 250
Department. 251
TRAPPER’S BAR & GRILL ANNUAL SNOW GOLF ON THE LAKE Trapper will hold their 252
annual Snow Golf on the Lake event on Saturday, February 10. For more information contact 253
Trapper’s at 651-784-7474. 254
255
COMMUNITY CALENDAR 256
257
Community Calendar – A Look Ahead 258
January 22, 2018 through February 12, 2018 259
Wednesday, January 31 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board 260
Monday, February 5 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Park Board 261
Monday, February 5 6:00 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 262
Thursday, February 8 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 263
Monday, February 12 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting 264
265
ADJOURN 266
267
There being no further business, Council Member Rafferty moved to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Council 268
Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 269
270
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, February 12, 2018. 271
272
COUNCIL MINUTES January 22, 2018
DRAFT
7
273
274
275
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 276
277
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 2A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 18-11, Authorizing the Issuance of 2018
Certificates of Indebtedness
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The 2018 Adopted Budget – Amended Capital Equipment Replacement Schedule calls for the
issuance of Certificates of Indebtedness in the amount of $303,900 to be used for the purchase of
capital equipment as part of our equipment replacement program. The interest rate on the certificates
will be 1.00%.
The Area and Unit Fund (406) has sufficient reserves to issue a loan to finance these purchases.
A special levy will pay for this certificate in 2019, 2020 and 2021 and the levy proceeds will be
credited to the Area and Unit Fund.
The equipment to be funded with the 2018 Certificates of Indebtedness is listed on the attached
schedule.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 18-11.
ATTACHMENTS
2018 Amended Capital Equipment Replacement Schedule
Resolution No. 18-11, Authorizing the Issuance of 2018 Certificates of Indebtedness
City of Lino Lakes
2018 Capital Equipment Replacement - Amended
Department Description Amount
Police CSO Vehicle $37,700
Investigations Vehicle 25,200
Total Police 62,900
Fleet Flusher Truck
$178,000
Ford Escape AWD 25,000
¾ Ton Pickup w/ Plow 38,000
Total Fleet 241,000
Total $303,900
Equipment Levy 0
Capital Equipment Fund 0
Certificates to be Issued $303,900
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-11
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 2018 CERTIFICATES OF
INDEBTEDNESS
WHEREAS, the amended 2018 Capital Equipment Replacement Schedule calls for the issuance
of certificates amounting to $303,900, and
WHEREAS, the Area and Unit Fund (406) has sufficient reserves to issue a loan, and
WHEREAS, a special levy will pay for the certificates in 2019, 2020, and 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes,
that:
1. It is hereby found and determined that it is necessary and expedient for the City to issue
a Certificate of Indebtedness for the purpose of financing the purchase of capital equipment, in
accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; and that the sale of said
Certificates to the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund (402), on terms hereinafter set forth, is hereby
ordered.
2. The City shall issue a Certificate of Indebtedness in the amount of $303,900.00 authorized
by the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; for the
purpose of financing the purchase of capital equipment. Said Certificate shall be dated on February1,
2018 and shall be payable to the Area and Unit Fund of the City of Lino Lakes.
3. Said Certificate shall be as follows:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2018 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS
Know All Men By These Presents that the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota,
hereby acknowledge the Capital Equipment Fund to be indebted and for values received promises
to pay the Area and Unit Fund of the City of Lino Lakes, the sum of $303,900 plus interest at 1.0%
per annum in three installments in 2019, 2020, and 2021 per attached schedule.
This Certificate is issued for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for the City and is
authorized by a duly adopted resolution of the City Council of Lino Lakes, dated February 12, 2018
and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301, and is to
be effective as of February 1, 2018.
It is hereby certified and recited, that all acts, conditions and things required by law to be
done, to exist, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Certificate
have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and
manner; that a direct, annual, irrepealable ad valorem tax will be duly levied by said City in an
amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest on this Certificate, together with all other existing
indebtedness of the said City, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation on
indebtedness.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
2018 CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS
FEBRUARY 1, 2018
PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
December 31, 2019 $ 103,900.00 $ 5,825.00 $109,725.00
December 31, 2020 100,000.00 2,000.00 102,000.00
December 31, 2021 100,000.00 1,000.00 101,000.00
Total $ 303,900.00 $ 8,825.00 $312,725.00
Interest Rate – 1.0%
Levy 2018 Payable 2019 $115,211.00 (includes required 5% overlevy)
Levy 2019 Payable 2020 107,100.00
Levy 2020 Payable 2021 106,050.00
Total $328,361.00
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Karissa Bartholomew, Human Resources Manager
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: Appointment of Parks Maintenance Worker
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to approve the appointment of Taylor Drahota for the vacant Parks
Maintenance Worker position in the Public Services Department.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Drahota holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Natural Resource Management, has interned for
Anoka County Parks as a maintenance worker, and is experienced in the construction trades.
The hourly rate of pay would be $21.73, which is step 1 of the union wage schedule. Mr. Drahota
would begin employment on March 5, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the appointment of Taylor Drahota for the Parks Maintenance Worker position.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: Approval of Resolution 18-12 Authorizing Construction Activity
in Support of Target Remodel
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
Ryan Companies has requested to conduct construction activity outside of the hours outlined
in Lino Lakes City Ordinance 903.03.
BACKGROUND
The Target Store located at 749 Apollo Dr. is currently being remodeled, which has resulted in
some construction activity taking place outside the hours outlined in Lino Lakes Ordinance
901.03 (4) b1. This City ordinance restricts construction activity as outlined below.
No person shall engage in or permit construction activity involving the use of any kind of
electric, pneumatic, diesel or gas-powered machine or other power equipment except as
follows:
7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday
No construction activity allowed Sunday and Federal Holidays
Police staff have responded to noise complaints for construction activity taking place outside
the authorized times on January 16, 2018 at 2:45 AM (CN 18-011796) and January 23, 2018 at
11:53 PM (CN 18-017761). Police staff spoke with the construction staff at Target and
informed them of the complaints. Construction workers altered or ended their activity once
police staff spoke with them and no further complaints were received those nights. Police staff
did not take any enforcement action in response to either incident.
The Project Manager, Brita Ryan, for Ryan Companies has contacted staff and requested that
they be allowed to conduct construction activity on February 19, 2018 and February 20, 2018
starting at 9:30 PM and ending at 7:00 AM. This overnight work will remove and replace two
large rooftop HVAC units. Ryan Companies current plan to complete this works is:
Night of 2/19
9:30 pm to 11:00 pm- begin crane set up at back of store
11:00 pm- 11:30 pm- fly old curb and unit off roof at back of store
11:30 pm-1:30 am- break down crane, move to front of store, and set up
1:30 am to 2:00 am- fly old curb and unit off roof at front of store
2:00 am-4:00 am- break down crane and set in parking lot near construction storage
4:00 am-7:00 am- crews will continue prepping the old openings for the new rooftop unit curb
and new rooftop unit
Night of 2/20
9:30 pm to 11:00 pm- begin crane set up at back of store
11:00 pm- 11:30 pm- fly new curb and new RTU on roof at back of store
11:30 pm-1:30 am- break down crane, move to front of store, and set up
1:30 am to 2:00 am- fly new curb and new RTU on roof at front of store
2:00 am-4:00 am- break down crane and drive off site
4:00 am-unknown - crews will proceed with installation of new curbs and units
The City ordinance does not allow for this type construction activity during the articulated
timeline.
This item was discussed at the February 5th Council Work Session. Representatives from Ryan
Companies were on hand to speak with the Council at the Work Session and indicated
that Ryan Companies had sent a letter to houses surrounding the Target store and three houses
back into the neighborhood. That letter is attached for your review. Ms. Britta Ryan
indicated that the neighborhood meeting took place on February 6th at 5:30 PM. Ms. Britta
Ryan informed staff that no residents attended the neighborhood meeting and they closed the
meeting at 6:15 PM.
As directed by Council, staff has developed a Resolution for Council consideration related to
the requested construction activity.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has prepared a resolution for Council consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 18-12
Lino Lakes City Ordinance 901.03
Ryan Companies letter dated February 2, 2018 to surrounding homes
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-12
AUTORIZING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN SUPPORT OF TARGET REMODEL
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes wishes to support the remodel of the Target store located at
749 Apollo Dr. in Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, in order to safely conduct installation of rooftop HVAC units in a manner that will
not have adverse economic impacts on the store, construction activity must take place during
hours the store is not open for business; and
WHEREAS, Ryan Companies, who is serving as the General Construction Contractor has
requested accommodation to Lino Lakes City Ordinance 901.03 to allow construction activity
after 7:00 PM and before 7:00 AM;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
the City does hereby authorize Ryan Companies and their sub-contractors to perform
construction activity on February 19, 2018 beginning at 9:30 PM and ending on February 20,
2018 at 7:00 AM; and again on February 20, 2018 beginning at 9:30 PM and ending on February
21, 2018 at 7:00 AM. The construction activity authorized is only for work related to the
removal of existing HVAC units from the rooftop and installation of new HVAC rooftop units.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member _________ and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_____________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Lino Lakes City Ordinance 901.03
§ 901.03 PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING PEACE AND SAFETY.
The following are declared to be nuisances affecting public peace and safety:
(1)All snow and ice not removed from public sidewalks 12 hours after the snow or other
precipitation causing the condition has ceased to fall;
(2)All trees, hedges, billboards or other obstructions which prevent persons from having a
clear view of all traffic approaching an intersection;
(3)All wires and limbs of trees which are so close to the surface of a sidewalk or street as to
constitute a danger to pedestrians or vehicles;
(4)(a) Noise emanating from any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State
of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minn. Rules Ch. 7030, as it may be amended from
time to time;
(b)1. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any
kind of electric, pneumatic, diesel or gas-powered machine or other power equipment except as
follows:
7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday
No construction activity allowed Sunday and federal holidays
2.The restriction on working hours in this § 901.03(4)(b)1. does not apply to persons
working on their own existing private residences;
(Am. Ord. 11-03, passed 4-28-2003)
(5)Obstructions and excavations affecting the ordinary use by the public of streets, alleys,
sidewalks or public grounds except under conditions as are permitted by this code or other
applicable law;
(6)Radio aerials or television antennae erected or maintained in a dangerous manner;
(7)Any use of property abutting on a public street or sidewalk or any use of a public street or
sidewalk which causes large crowds of people to gather, obstructing traffic and the free use of
the street or sidewalk;
(8)All hanging signs, awnings and other similar structures over streets and sidewalks or so
situated so as to endanger public safety, or not constructed and maintained in a sound condition;
(9)The allowing of rain water, ice or snow to fall from any building or structure upon any
street or sidewalk or to flow across any sidewalk;
(10)Any barbed wire fence less than six feet above the ground and within ten feet of a public
sidewalk or way;
(11)All dangerous, unguarded machinery in any public place or so situated or operated on
private property as to attract the public;
(12)Waste water cast upon or permitted to flow upon streets or other public property;
(13)Accumulations in the open of discarded or disused machinery, household appliances,
automobile bodies, lumber, wood or other material, or the rank growth of vegetation among the
items so accumulated, in a manner conducive to the harboring of rats, mice, snakes or vermin, or
in a manner creating fire, health or safety hazards from the accumulation;
(14)Any well, hole or similar excavation which is left uncovered or in other condition as to
constitute a hazard to any child or other person coming on the premises where it is located;
(15)Obstruction to the free flow of water in a natural waterway or a public street drain, gutter
or ditch through accumulation of trash or other materials;
(16)The placing or throwing on any street, sidewalk or other public property of any glass,
tacks, nails, bottles or other substances which may injure any person or animal or damage any
pneumatic tire when passing over the substances;
(17)The depositing of paper, litter, debris, garbage or refuse on a public right-of-way or on
adjacent private property or the throwing of any matter from a motor vehicle;
(18)(a) The parking, keeping, or storing of, or the permitting of junk cars on a public street
or alley or on any private land, or premises which are owned, occupied or controlled by the one
so doing or so permitting except where such is being pursued in accordance with existing zoning.
(b)This shall also apply to anyone who shall park, keep or place a vehicle even if he or she
is not the owner of the land upon which the vehicle is parked, kept or placed.
(c)For the purpose of this section, a JUNK CAR means any motor vehicle which is not in
operating condition, or which is partially dismantled, or which is used for sale of parts or as a
source of repair or replacement parts for other vehicles, or which is kept for scrapping,
dismantling or salvage of any kind, or is not properly and currently licensed for operation within
the State of Minnesota; and
(19)All other conditions or things which are likely to cause injury to the person or property of
anyone.
(Prior Code, § 901.03)
February 2, 2018
Britta Ryan, Senior Project Engineer
Ryan Companies
533 S 3rd Street, Suite 100
Minneapolis, MN 55415
612-492-4945
Re: T1448 Target Lino Lakes
To the Community Members of Lino Lakes:
My name is Britta Ryan and I am one of the Project Managers on the renovation of Target Lino
Lakes. In the last year, Target has made a large effort to rebrand their stores and improve
customer experience across the country. Although we are confident you will enjoy the final
product, we understand the inconveniences that come with a live remodel-especially one that is
happening in your backyard.
The remodel of your Target started the last week of December and we expect it to be completed
in early May. Until then, we are reaching out to receive feedback on how to make these next few
months a more favorable experience for your neighborhood. We will be holding a meeting for
your neighborhood next Tuesday, February 6th at 5:30 PM. If you know of other neighbors who
would be interested in attending, please feel free to pass this invite on to them as well. If you are
able to attend we will be meeting in Guest Services. If your schedule will not allow you to attend,
but you are still willing to provide feedback and ideas for improvement, please send me an email
at britta.ryan@ryancompanies.com or give me a call at 651-245-8780.
We appreciate your time and valuable input.
Kind regards,
Britta M.S. Ryan
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 4B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Swenson, Public Safety Director
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: Sale of Fire Apparatus
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department is requesting Council authorization sell a 1995
Custom Fire Rescue Pumper (1FDYS82E2SVA72033) to the Central Lakes Fire Department
(CLFD) for $30,000.00.
BACKGROUND
During the 2017 fire apparatus discussions, it was decided to sell both 1995 Fire Custom Fire
Rescue Pumpers. On July 24, 2017, the Council authorized the sale of one of the 1995 Fire
Custom Fire Rescue Pumpers to Ellsburg Volunteer Fire Department for $33,500.00.
Staff listed the other fire engine on six fire industry sites and the League of MN Cities website.
Since the sale of the first engine in July of 2017, staff has had two inquires on this fire engine.
Attached to this staff report is a letter from CLFD Fire Chief Jason Doughty providing the
details of their offer and their organization.
CLFD is offering the City of Lino Lakes $30,000.00 for the purchase of 1995 Custom Fire
Rescue Pumper contingent upon a current fire pump certification.
It should be noted that the City of Lino Lakes purchased this piece of apparatus from the City
of Woodbury in 2014 at a cost of $15,000.00, installed upgraded emergency lighting and
graphics for a total investment of $28,285.65.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the sale of the 1995 Custom Fire Rescue Pumper
(1FDYS82E2SVA72033) for $30,000.00 and deposit the proceeds from the sale of this fire
apparatus into the Fire Apparatus Replacement Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
Central Lakes Fire Department letter, dated February 8, 2018
Photo of 1995 Custom Fire Rescue Pumper
Central Lakes Fire Department
7562 Murphy Lake Rd
Eleveth, MN. 55734
Lino Lakes Public Safety Department February 8, 2018
Attn: Director John Swenson
640 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55115
Public Safety Director Swenson,
On behalf of the Central Lakes Fire Department, I would like to offer you $30,000.00 for the 1995 Ford
L8000 fire engine you have listed for sale. This offer is contingent upon the testing and certification of
the fire pump.
Central Lakes Fire Department became aware of the engine you have for sale through the Ellsburg
Volunteer Fire Department. As you know, Ellsburg purchased a fire engine from Lino Lakes in July of
2017.
The Central Lakes Fire Department provides fire and rescue services to 36 square mile area out of two
fire stations. This engine would replace 1981 Seagrave Pumper, which we are not able to get parts for
any longer nor are we able to get the fire pump certified. As you know this is critical safety concern for
our staff and community.
The purchase of the 1995 Ford L8000 fire engine would also enhance our department’s interoperability
with the Ellsburg Volunteer Fire Department. As mutual aid partners and neighboring jurisdictions in a
rural setting the ability to have the same fire engine is vitally important.
Thank you for considering this offer.
Respectfully submitted,
Jason Doughty
Fire Chief
1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No.
02-18, Vacating Drainage & Utility Easement, Lot 15, Block 2,
NorthPointe 2nd Addition
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5
INTRODUCTION
Staff is requesting City Council consideration of the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 02-18,
vacating Drainage and Utility easement, Lot 15, Block 2, Northpointe 2nd Addition.
BACKGROUND
6743 Palm Street is a residential parcel located on the north side of Palm Street. The property
owners, Mike and Shelby Piette, have submitted a land use application requesting the vacation,
of a portion, of a drainage easement on the property.
The drainage and utility easement was dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes in 2014 with the
NorthPointe 2nd Addition plat. The easement overlaps an existing Northern States Power Co.
(Xcel Energy) gas and electric easement located on the property. The current owners, Mike and
Shelby Piette, would like to construct a deck on the rear of their home into the easement area.
The applicant is requesting that a portion of the drainage easement be vacated to allow for the
construction of a deck.
Xcel Energy has issued a Consent to Improvements approving alterations of the gas and electric
easements for the proposed deck, enclosed. The Drainage and Utility easement was placed
over the Xcel Energy easement, and thus vacating with the consent of Xcel Energy, is not an
encumbrance to the City. The proposed deck does not impact City utilities or drainage.
The Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation Description Sketch prepared by Carlson McCain
on December 14, 2017 detailing the proposed drainage and utility area to be vacated and the
proposed location of the deck is enclosed.
The second reading of the ordinance is scheduled for February 26, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 02-18 Vacating Drainage
& Utility Easements, Lot 15, Block 2, NorthPointe 2nd Addition.
2
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 02-18
2. Xcel Energy Consent to Improvements
3. Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation Description Sketch
1
1st Reading: 2/12/2018 Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 02-18
ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
(Lot 15, Block 2, NorthPointe 2nd Addition)
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains:
Section 1: Findings of Fact
1. The City Council of Lino Lakes has determined to vacate a portion of the
drainage and utility easement dedicated over, under, and across Lot 15, Block 2,
NORTHPOINTE 2ND ADDITION, as shown in Exhibit A and legally described
as follows:
Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 15; thence South 33 degrees
15 minutes 59 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northeasterly line of said
Lot 15, a distance of 66.14 feet; thence South 52 degrees 57 minutes 05 seconds
West, 43.87 feet to the point of beginning of the area to be described; thence
continuing South 52 degrees 57 minutes 05 seconds West, 32.13 feet; thence
North 55 degrees 23 minutes 12 seconds West, 4.62 feet; thence North 34 degrees
36 minutes 48 seconds East, 30.50 feet; thence South 55 degrees 23 minutes 12
seconds East, 14.73 feet to the point of beginning.
Said described area contains ±295 sq. ft.; and
2. A public hearing was held on February 12, 2018 before the City Council in the
City Hall Council Chambers after due published and posted notice had been given
and reasonable attempts were made to give personal notice to all affected property
owners, and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and
3. It appears to be in the best interest of the City to vacate such drainage and utility
easements; and
4. The Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation shall be recorded through Anoka
County Recorder’s Office; and
5. Four-fifths of all members of the City Council concur with this ordinance.
Section 2: Easement Vacated
The drainage and utility easement described herein is hereby vacated.
2
Section 3: Effect
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter and upon filing of the Drainage and Utility
Easement Vacation for Lot 15, Block 2, NORTHPOINTE 2ND ADDITION.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council
Member_____________and was duly seconded by Council Member ___________ and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
____________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee
C. C. MEETING DATE: February 12, 2018
TOPIC: Pavement Management Program
i. Consider Resolution 18-13, Accepting 2017 Pavement
Management Report
ii. Consider Resolution 18-14, Authorize the Preparation
of Plans and Specifications, 2018 Mill and Overlay
Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council authorized the 2017 Pavement Management Report on September 25, 2017 to
evaluate the current condition of the City’s roadway system and to generate a 5-year Capital
Improvement Plan. The 2017 Pavement Management Report was presented at the Council on
February 5, 2018 along with the proposed 5-year Capital Improvement Plan.
The proposed 2018 Mill and Overlay project includes Ware Road and the Brandywood
neighborhood. After further evaluation of pavement ratings and pavement core data completed
in the Brandywood area it was determined that this was a priority. The estimated project cost is
$715,000. The project would be funded through the pavement management budget and state aid
funds. The project includes the following roadways:
Ware Road (Ash Street to 300’ south of Birch Street)
Buckthorn Lane
White Oak Road
Whitetail Trail
Chokecherry Road
Velvetleaf Lane
The proposed schedule for this project is as follows:
City Council Authorizes Plans and Spec’s Feb. 12, 2018
City Council Orders Project & Approves Plans and Specifications Mar. 12, 2018
City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids Mar. 12, 2018
City Open Bids April 16, 2018
City Council Awards Contract April 23, 2018
Construction Begins May, 2018
Final Completion August 31, 2018
WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, have submitted a proposal to complete the plans and
specifications, and provide bid documents, for an amount not to exceed $43,978.00 based actual
time spent on the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of:
i. Resolution No. 18-13, Accepting 2017 Pavement Management Report
ii. Resolution No. 18-14, Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications, 2018 Mill
and Overlay Project
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 18-13
2. Resolution No. 18-14
3. Pavement Management Report
4. WSB Proposal
5. Project Location Map
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-13
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 17-109 Authorizing the Update of the Pavement Management
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2017 Pavement Management Report was completed and presented to Council;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the City to accept the
2017 Pavement Management Report,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the
Mayor and Clerk are do hereby accept the 2017 Pavement Management Report.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 18-14
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE 2018 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to perform mill and overlay on recommended street segments, and
WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering the project finding that it would be in the best interest of
the city to proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, WSB and Associates, the City Engineer, has submitted a proposal to prepare plans
and specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes:
1. Authorizes the Preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the 2018 Mill and
Overlay Project.
2. WSB and Associates are designated as the engineer for this improvement and directed
to prepare plans and specifications for the 2018 Mill & Overlay Project for an amount
not to exceed $43,978.00.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2018.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
_______________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
_______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
WSB Project No. 010884
1/8/2018
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
Lino Lakes, MN
Prepared for City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Pavement Management Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1
II. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 2
What is a Pavement Management Program? ........................................................................................................... 2
Why establish a Pavement Management Program? ................................................................................................. 2
What is Pavement Forensics? ................................................................................................................................... 2
III. Pavement Condition Report ................................................................................................................................. 3
EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION ............................................................................................................................. 3
Pavement Rating Examples ................................................................................................................................... 5
IV. Pavement Management Report ........................................................................................................................... 9
Special Maintenance Actions Recommended ........................................................................................................... 9
Preventative Maintenance.................................................................................................................................... 9
Preservation ........................................................................................................................................................ 11
Reclamation ........................................................................................................................................................ 11
Reconstruction .................................................................................................................................................... 11
PAVER Modeling and Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 12
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 12
PCI Deterioration Models ................................................................................................................................... 12
Condition Performance Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 13
Work Planning Models ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Recommendations and 5-year CIP ...................................................................................................................... 22
Appendices .................................................................................................................................................................. 23
Appendix A .............................................................................................................................................................. 24
Pavement PCI Map .............................................................................................................................................. 24
Appendix B .............................................................................................................................................................. 25
Pavement PCI Ratings ......................................................................................................................................... 25
Pavement Management Report
Page | 1
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the findings for the pavement inspection of the road segments performed by WSB &
Associates in the city of Lino Lakes completed in October 2017. This report gives an overview of the road condition
in the city and provides recommendations on pavement management.
Per the City plan, pavement conditions for one-fourth of the City roadways are rated annually. Roadways not
rated in the current year are then projected using the PAVER software. The projections are based on past
inspection ratings and decreased based on a deterioration curve. Recent roadway improvement projects were
updated in the condition ratings. Private roadways and gravel roadways were not evaluated.
A summary of the pavement condition findings are as follows:
• WSB’s GIS system states that there are currently 97 miles of bituminous roadways in Lino Lakes,
which 22 miles were inspected in 2017.
• The current weighted average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for bituminous roads in Lino Lakes is
71.32. The PCI is based on a 0 to 100 scale, with increasing PCI as better condition roadways. This
weighted average is taken from the PCI values generated on each segment based on the distresses
identified in the field, and averaged depending on the area of each segment. Any type of road
maintenance (i.e. patching or crack sealing) done prior to inspections would be accounted for in each
PCI value.
• Percentage of bituminous roadways in respective category, in terms of area, are as follows:
o “Adequate” category requiring preventative maintenance – 62.8%
o “Marginal” category requiring preservation – 22.8%
o “Problem” category requiring reconstruction – 14.4%
• There are 3.99 miles of gravel roadways and 3.67 miles of private roadways within Lino Lakes, which
are not included in the pavement management.
A majority of the roadways within the City are currently in adequate condition. The City has been adding new
roadways constructed with development, and has also completed roadway maintenance/reconstruction on
existing roadways.
In modeling the pavement condition over 20 years, it was found that the marginal category roadways drop into
problem category roadways if not preserved within a certain time frame. A budget driven model and a target PCI
model were analyzed to determine the level of funding needed to cost effectively maintain the roadways. An
analysis of the preservation budget showed an 8 to 10 percent per year increase matched the maintenance needs.
It was also concluded that if funding is available in the near future, the City should consider a larger preservation
project to keep marginal roadways from becoming problem roadways.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 2
II. INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?
A pavement management program includes a systematic method of inspecting and rating the pavement condition
of roads in a network, followed by performing a cost-effective analysis of various maintenance and rehabilitation
strategies, which assists decision makers in making the best decision on the use of available resources. The
pavement management ideology, if successfully implemented, can result in drastic improvement of the life cycle
costs, performance, and life of roads. The main objectives of a pavement management program are to maintain a
high-level network, evaluate the effectiveness of different alternatives, and optimize timing of maintenance and
construction activities. These objectives can be met by routinely inspecting the road conditions. The data is
typically managed with pavement management software that can manage, sort, and store the collected data.
Using the software, various models can be generated that allows the user to run different budget scenarios.
WHY ESTABLISH A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?
A Pavement Management Program can serve as a good guide for the City to make strategic and appropriate
decisions relating in maintenance and reconstruction activities to maximize the life cycle of the pavements. The
program will also provide some financial strategies to help the City to allocate available resources in an efficient
manner.
WHAT IS PAVEMENT FORENSICS?
Pavement forensics involves taking cores on the roadways to identify the pavement structure and condition under
the visible layer of the pavement, such as the depths of pavement layers, signs of bonding or de-bonding, and
distresses that might not be visible from the surface. Recommendations can then be made on certain
maintenance or reconstruction activity is best suited for the roadway. Several factors should be considered when
determining the number of cores to be taken, which include the pavement condition or visible distresses present
on the pavement and the variability in the pavement depth as the cores are being taken. The findings from the
pavement forensic have been proven to lead to cost savings and better solutions for roadway maintenance.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 3
III. PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT
EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was used to measure pavement condition on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being
a perfect roadway with no distress. This report provides the latest pavement conditions. PAVER, which is an asset
management software, was used to record and estimate the conditions of the roadways. The software calculates
the PCI using the deduct values, which are based on the distress type, distress severity, and distress quantity.
Examples of distress type are alligator cracking, pothole, and rutting. Distress severity is divided into low, medium,
and high. Distress quantity is either the number of counts, length, or area depending on the distress type.
Majority of the bituminous roadway systems at the time of inspection are in good condition, and are in need of
maintenance to preserve the road structure. The following is the breakdown of the pavement overall condition in
the City:
Pavement Condition Index Mileage Percent of System
Adequate Category (70.01 – 100.00) 59.8 62.8
Marginal Category (40.01 – 70.00) 21.9 22.8
Problem Category (0.00 – 40.00) 15.6 14.4
Pavements that fall into the adequate category are recommended to have surface treatment preventative
maintenance performed. The lower the PCI, the less effective a preventative maintenance activity is in preserving
the life of the roadways. Each type of preventative maintenance serves its own function, and project selection
depends on the type and severity of distresses observed on the surface of the road. Streets that fall into the lower
range of the adequate category, with PCI in low the 70s, may be prompted to perform a Texas Underseal or mill
and overlay in order to extend the life of the road. It is recommended to evaluate the road condition prior to
project selection to determine the appropriate type of construction for the roadways.
Pavement preservation is recommended to be conducted on roadways that fall into the marginal category. Some
of the pavement preservation methods are partial and full depth mill and overlay. Roadways that fall into the
lower range of the marginal category, with PCI in the 40s, may be monitored without performing any maintenance
activities since they have degraded to the point that pavement preservation methods are no longer effective and
the roadways still have another few years’ time before a reconstruction is needed. Prior to any mill and overlay or
full depth bituminous removal and replacement, coring is strongly recommended to determine if the bituminous
layer thickness is sufficient and underlying pavement is in good condition. If there are issues in the base and
subgrade layers, pavement preservation methods are not recommended and those roadways would fall into the
problem category that a reclamation or reconstruction needs to be done.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 4
Reclamation or reconstruction is recommended to be performed on streets that fall into the problem category.
Reclamation can only be done if there is enough gravel underneath the bituminous layer. Thus, coring would be
recommended prior to any design work to determine the appropriate improvement.
The PCI values obtained were based on visual inspection and the recommended strategies for each category shall
only be used as guidelines. Recommended maintenance activities are further explained in the Pavement
Management Report.
Appendix A includes maps of all the pavements in the City showing their PCI classification. The specific PCI rating
for each pavement segment is included in Appendix B.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 5
PAVEMENT RATING EXAMPLES
PCI Rating = 27
Talle Lane (Segment ID: 541)
Detailed Distresses:
• Patching, Low Severity, 50.17%
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 10.03%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 1.00%
• Alligator Cracking, High Severity, 10.05%
Pavement Management Report
Page | 6
PCI Rating = 43
Timberwolf Trail (Segment ID: 564)
Detailed Distresses:
• Patching, Low Severity, 3.94%
• Patching, Medium Severity, 7.87%
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 10.01%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 0.98%
• Block Cracking, Medium Severity, 10.03%
Pavement Management Report
Page | 7
PCI Rating = 77
Tele Drive (Segment ID: 553)
Detailed Distresses:
• Alligator Cracking, Low Severity, 2.83%
• Alligator Cracking, Medium Severity, 0.28%
• Linear Cracking, Low Severity, 0.02%
Pavement Management Report
Page | 8
PCI Rating = 97
Rolling Hills Drive (Segment ID: 454)
Detailed Distresses:
• Linear Cracking, Low Severity, 0.04%
Pavement Management Report
Page | 9
IV. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT
This pavement management report includes a systematic method of inspecting and rating the pavement condition
of roads in a network, followed by performing a cost-effective analysis of various maintenance and rehabilitation
strategies, which assists decision makers in making the best decision on the use of available resources. It is also
used to supply updated information regarding the current management plan.
S PECIAL MAINTENANCE A CTIONS RECOMMENDED
Lino Lakes has many options available for pavement preventative maintenance, preservation, and reconstruction
including reclamation, mill and overlays, and Texas underseal to extend the life of a roadway. These maintenance
actions are anticipated to last several years and be cost effective.
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Preventative maintenance can be defined as a treatment to an existing road that will help preserve and protect the
road, while also slow future deterioration. This type of maintenance will improve the condition of the system
without increasing its structural capacity.
Implementing a preventative maintenance strategy is both cost effective and appropriate since maintenance costs
increase with pavement age. Preventative maintenance actions can be completed at a much lower cost than
preservation actions such as mill and overlays. By applying the appropriate preventative maintenance strategy at
the right time, it can keep the good roads in good condition at a lower cost, which is a better strategy than waiting
for the road to deteriorate before applying an improvement. With preventative maintenance techniques, you can
extend the life of a pavement from 20 years to close to 50 years if the maintenance is done at the correct time.
Preventative maintenance is best performed on newer pavements prior to the appearance of significant and/or
severe distresses. Types of preventative maintenance include crack sealing, fog sealing, chip sealing, micro
surfacing.
Crack Seal
Crack sealing is a type of preventative maintenance done to prevent the intrusion of water and incompressible
materials into cracks. When water enters the cracks, it can soften the sub-base and base layers and lead to further
cracking and the development of more severe alligator cracking and subsequently the formation of potholes. In
Minnesota where freeze/thaw cycles exist, the water that enters the system through cracks can lead to frost
heaving issue. Crack sealing should be completed as preventative maintenance early in the life of a new pavement
or overlay, typically in 2 to 4 years, and roughly every 7 years or as determined to be necessary. This technique
will not improve the structural capacity of the pavement but will slow down future structural deterioration that
could be caused when water enters the system. It is recommended that crack sealing is done prior to either fog
sealing or chip sealing.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 10
Chip Seal
Chip sealing process involves an application of a uniform layer of emulsified asphalt followed immediately by a
layer of cover aggregate across the pavement surface. Pre-sweeping and filling of all cracks shall be done prior to
the chip seal application. Chip sealing creates a waterproof surface membrane to the existing membrane, which
helps to slow down the deterioration of the pavement from oxidation as well as to prevent the intrusion of water.
Chip sealing is typically completed one year after crack sealing. Normally, a good chip seal placed on a newer road
can last 5 to 10 years. This assumes the chip seal is protected during placement to allow proper time to cure.
Other factors which affect a chip seals performance include the type of binder that is used, the condition of the
underlying road and external factors such as plow damage. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that
these external factors do not contribute to premature failure of a chip seal. It is important to note that chip seals
can be effective if constructed properly and if placed on a road that is a good candidate for chip seal. Field surveys
will assist in determining which roads are candidates for a chip seal.
WSB would recommend the City to reference MnDOT Spec 2356 or the 2006 Minnesota Chip Seal Handbook for
guidelines to use when chip sealing. It would be our recommendation that on residential streets, the City use CRS-
2 oil with 1/8” Dresser Trap Rock at a rate of .24 to .26 gallons per square yard. On arterials with no bike traffic, it
would be our recommendation to use FA-2 aggregate with CRS-2P emulsion at a rate of .26 to .28 gallons per
square yard. On heavy commercial streets, it would be our recommendation to use FA-3 aggregate with CRS-2P
emulsion at a rate of .35 to .4 gallons per square yard. The larger size aggregate will withstand the heavier vehicle
traffic.
Fog Seal
WSB would recommend the City reference MnDOT Spec 2355 for more information on fog sealing guidelines. Fog
sealing is typically completed one year after crack sealing. Typically, a fog seal will last 3 to 5 years. It is important
to note that while the color of a fog seal may fade as early as a year after its application, a fog seal remains
effective for as many as 2 to 4 years. Fog sealing is another type of preventative maintenance in which only the
asphalt emulsion is applied to the roadway to protect the roadway surface from environmental aging, moisture
damage, and oxidation. This preventative maintenance technique will not add any strength to the pavement.
Micro surfacing
WSB would recommend the City reference MnDOT Spec 2354 for more information on micro surfacing guidelines.
Micro surfacing is a mix of crushed aggregate, mineral filler, and latex-modified emulsified asphalt. It is applied by
a truck equipped with a squeegee or spreader box. Micro surfacing can be applied in multiple layers. It is effective
at sealing low-severity cracks, including fatigue cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. It also
addresses raveling, friction loss, moisture infiltration, bleeding, and roughness. Micro surfacing is often selected to
inhibit raveling and oxidation, as well as improving surface friction and filling minor irregularities and rutting in a
roadway. A micro surfacing treatment can be expected to extend a roadway’s life by 3 to 6 years, depending on
the number of layers applied.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 11
This treatment provides resurfacing from 3/8″ to 3/4″ thick and returns traffic use in one hour under average
conditions. This can be applied in multiple applications and provide minor reprofiling. Micro surfacing can also fill
wheel ruts up to 1 1/2″ in depth in one pass and produces high surface friction.
PRESERVATION
An overlay involves placing a new layer of bituminous material on top of an existing asphalt surface. A mill and
overlay involves grinding all or a portion of the in-place asphalt surface and topping it with a bituminous wearing
course over the entire surface. This type of action provides a structural improvement to the roadway. We
recommended pavement coring to evaluate the subsurface conditions. Information such as depths of pavement
layers, signs of bonding and de-bonding, and distresses that are not visible from the road surface can be obtained
through pavement coring.
Texas underseal is a non-conventional pavement preservation method, which a chip seal is placed under an
overlay. The chip seal layer acts as stress relief membrane providing a crack resistance asphalt layer. We
recommend that the City consider Texas underseal for overlay projects.
RECLAMATION
There are two conventional types of reclamation, which are full depth reclamation (FDR) and stabilized full depth
reclamation (SFDR). FDR involves grinding the asphalt pavement with a portion of the underlying base, followed
by an overlay or a surface treatment. SFDR is FDR with the addition of stabilizing additive, which are asphalt
based, chemical based, or compaction aids. The asphalt additives can be foamed asphalt or asphalt emulsion.
Reclamation brings the pavement condition back to a 100 (perfect condition) rating.
RECONSTRUCTION
Reconstruction includes removing and replacing the existing pavement and subgrade. Subsurface water
management is a significant component of a reconstruction project. Thus, addressing roadway drainage is
included in roadway reconstruction projects. Reconstruction also brings the pavement condition back to a 100
(perfect condition) rating.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 12
PAVER MODELING AND ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
PAVER software was utilized in the pavement management for the streets in the City of Lino Lakes. First step in
the pavement management process was to develop a pavement deterioration curve for bituminous roadways.
Next step was to apply the deterioration curve to all the roadways, and run the 20-year design model. Two main
models of interest were budget driven model and target PCI driven model. A curve was also generated when there
will not be any maintenance activities done over the years to show the importance of performing maintenance
actions to prolong the life of pavements.
PCI DETERIORATION MODELS
Pavement performance curve, which was based on the Army Corps of Engineer data (Figure IVa), was used to
estimate pavement performance for roadways that were not inspected this year. The graph below represents
typical pavement deterioration rate, and it may varies depending on the type of maintenance activities done over
the period of pavement life. In order to predict pavement performance, all the bituminous roadways were
assigned to the following deterioration curve.
Figure IVa. Pavement performance curve applied to all bituminous roadways in Lino Lakes.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
PC
I
Years in Service (Age)
PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE CURVE
Pavement Management Report
Page | 13
CONDITION PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Work history obtained from the City was included in the model to accurately portray the condition of the streets
with respect to the year since construction. The three main inputs for the model were chip seal, mill and overlay,
and reclamation / reconstruction. Chip seal was treated as a surface treatment and it does not affect the
structural capacity of the pavement, while mill and overlay was treated as major maintenance and repair activity
since it improves the structural capacity of the pavement. Reclamation and reconstruction were input as new
construction. A condition performance analysis was performed to predict the PCI ratings for the roadways that
were not inspected this year.
WORK PLANNING MODELS
Maintenance cost increases considerably with the age of pavement. Thus, implementing a preventative
maintenance strategy proves to be both cost effective and appropriate. Preventative maintenance activities such
as crack seal, fog seal, chip seal, and micro surfacing are done at a much lower cost compared to preservation
actions such as mill and overlay. The main idea behind the preventative maintenance strategy is that applying the
appropriate maintenance action at the right time will keep the good roads in good condition at a lower cost. This
is often a better strategy than leaving the road to deteriorate over time before performing maintenance. With the
application of proper preventative techniques, the pavement life often can be extended from 20 years to up to 50
years, provided the maintenance is done at the correct time frame.
In PAVER, Preventive Maintenance involves crack seal, patching, and joint seal, along with surface treatments such
as chip seal, fog seal, and micro surfacing. The critical condition index used was 70 PCI, which is the threshold that
mill and overlay, surface reconstruction, reclamation, and complete reconstruction or new construction will be
carried out.
Using PAVER, the funding level needed to maintain the current weighted average PCI can be predicted. This dollar
budget will continue to expand if a pavement management plan is not implemented. A good pavement
management plan will budget for preventative maintenance to maintain the pavements in good condition, and
preservation to improve the structural capacity of the existing roadway.
Figure IVb shows the pavement condition over a course of 20 years, with a variable annual budget available.
Figure IVc shows the budget required to maintain various PCI levels for the pavements, including the weighted
average PCI of 71.32 at the time of inspection, with no condition tolerance. These scenarios include maintenance
activities listed above to be performed, which are Preventative Maintenance, Preservation and Reconstruction.
These models also accounted for an inflation rate of 3%. Preservation was set to only be done when the PCI
ranges from 70 to 100, when the roads are still in adequate condition. Re-planning of projects was set to every 3
years after recommended maintenance activities were performed since routine inspection and planning help to
keep track of the condition of the streets thus appropriate maintenance can be applied.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 14
Unit pricing for the maintenance activities that were included in the 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and
PAVER analysis were provided by the City, which were obtained from recent project costs. The unit pricing
includes engineering, legal, financial, and administrative costs. Following are the unit pricing for each type of
maintenance activity.
Type of Activity Unit Pricing (Per Linear Foot)
Mill and overlay $ 65
Full depth reclamation $ 95
Reconstruction $ 235
Under the 5-year CIP, reconstruction costs were used to evaluate all the projects that fall under the “problem”
category. Although some of the roadway segments may be a candidate for full depth reclamation, further
investigation such as pavement forensics needs to be performed on the roadways to determine if there are
enough underlying good materials for a full depth reclamation. Thus, a more conservative approach was
conducted by applying the reconstruction costs than to utilizing the reclamation costs.
PAVER runs the analysis using unit pricing for all the maintenance activities in terms of square foot instead of linear
foot. All the unit pricing listed above was converted to the unit pricing that PAVER uses. An average road width of
32-feet was used to run the model.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 15
BUDGET DRIVEN MODEL
Two scenarios were analyzed to determine if the current City budget is sufficient to maintain the streets in a cost-
effective manner. The City’s Preservation “Mill and Overlay” budget was specifically reviewed. These marginal
roadways are the focus due to the aging infrastructure in this category and the time dependent structural
maintenance.
A model was analyzed with the existing funding and another one where the Preservation funding was increased.
The first model was based on:
• Existing budget for Preventative $50,000 (crack fill, pothole patching) + $80,000 (chip seal, other)
• Existing budget for Preservation $580,000 (2018 budget, increase 5% per year)
• Proposed budget for Reconstruction including $5,200,000 allocated in 2018 and $2,600,000 allocated in
2021. After that $3,250,000 was programed in every 3 years.
A second model was performed with:
• Existing budget for Preventative $50,000 (crack fill, pothole patching) + $80,000 (chip seal, other)
• Increase budget for Preservation $580,000 (2018 budget, increase 10% per year)
• Proposed budget for Reconstruction as in the first model
Pavement Management Report
Page | 16
Table IVa. Existing Annual budget
Year Preventative
Budget
Preservation
Budget
Reconstruction
Budget Total Existing Annual Budget
2018 $130,000 $580,000 $5,200,000 $5,910,000
2019 $130,000 $609,000 $739,000
2020 $130,000 $639,450 $769,450
2021 $130,000 $671,423 $2,600,000 $3,401,423
2022 $130,000 $704,994 $834,994
2023 $130,000 $740,243 $870,243
2024 $130,000 $777,255 $3,250,000 $4,157,255
2025 $130,000 $816,118 $946,118
2026 $130,000 $856,924 $986,924
2027 $130,000 $899,770 $3,250,000 $4,279,770
2028 $130,000 $944,759 $1,074,759
2029 $130,000 $991,997 $1,121,997
2030 $130,000 $1,041,597 $3,250,000 $4,421,597
2031 $130,000 $1,093,677 $1,223,677
2032 $130,000 $1,148,360 $1,278,360
2033 $130,000 $1,205,778 $3,250,000 $4,585,778
2034 $130,000 $1,266,067 $1,396,067
2035 $130,000 $1,329,371 $1,459,371
2036 $130,000 $1,395,839 $3,250,000 $4,775,839
2037 $130,000 $1,465,631 $1,595,631
Average $130,000 $958,913 $3,435,714 $2,291,413
Total $2,600,000 $19,178,253 $24,050,000 $45,828,253
Pavement Management Report
Page | 17
Table IVb. 10 % Increase Per Year in Budget for Preservation
Year Preventative
Budget
Preservation
Budget
Reconstruction
Budget
Total Annual Budget with
10% Increase Per Year
2018 $130,000 $580,000 $5,200,000 $5,910,000
2019 $130,000 $638,000 $768,000
2020 $130,000 $701,800 $831,800
2021 $130,000 $771,980 $2,600,000 $3,501,980
2022 $130,000 $849,178 $979,178
2023 $130,000 $934,096 $1,064,096
2024 $130,000 $1,027,505 $3,250,000 $4,407,505
2025 $130,000 $1,130,256 $1,260,256
2026 $130,000 $1,243,282 $1,373,282
2027 $130,000 $1,367,610 $3,250,000 $4,747,610
2028 $130,000 $1,504,371 $1,634,371
2029 $130,000 $1,654,808 $1,784,808
2030 $130,000 $1,820,288 $3,250,000 $5,200,288
2031 $130,000 $2,002,317 $2,132,317
2032 $130,000 $2,202,549 $2,332,549
2033 $130,000 $2,422,804 $3,250,000 $5,802,804
2034 $130,000 $2,665,084 $2,795,084
2035 $130,000 $2,931,593 $3,061,593
2036 $130,000 $3,224,752 $3,250,000 $6,604,752
2037 $130,000 $3,547,227 $3,677,227
Average $130,000 $1,660,975 $3,435,714 $2,993,475
Total $2,600,000 $33,219,500 $24,050,000 $59,869,500
Pavement Management Report
Page | 18
Figure IVc. Annual weighted average PCI with different budget available.
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
We
i
g
h
t
e
d
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
P
C
I
Years
Budget Driven Annual Condition
Current Budget 10% Increase for Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 19
As shown in Figure IVc, if the City maintains its current budget for pavement management it will result in a
pavement condition difference of approximately 10 PCI in 20 years. By increasing the Preservation budget by 10%
per year the City can maintain a more reasonable PCI. The Reconstruction budget could also be reviewed to
increase the PCI however that has been modeled at this time.
Initially, the weighted average PCI drops and that is due to a significant number of roadways deteriorating before
Preservation and Reconstruction activities are performed. The drop is then followed by a gradual increase after
appropriate maintenance activities are carried out. Figure IVc shows that by increasing the annual budget for
Preservation, the City would be able to maintain their roadway condition over time. Since there will be an increase
in the percentage of roadways that falls under the marginal category in a few years, we would recommend the City
consider a larger scale of mill and overlay project in the near future to address the roadways before needing a
reclamation or reconstruction.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 20
TARGET PCI DRIVEN MODEL
Three scenarios were run to determine the budget required to maintain or achieve a certain target PCI. Models
ran include decreasing to a PCI of 65, maintaining current PCI (71.32), increasing to a PCI of 75. Maximum iteration
was employed for each model to achieve the most accurate results, with no condition tolerance.
Table IVc. Annual budget required to maintain desired condition rating.
Year 65 PCI Maintain Current PCI 75 PCI
2018 $2,164,204 $2,596,375 $2,975,384
2019 $2,164,705 $2,591,058 $2,977,368
2020 $2,159,715 $2,589,842 $2,976,986
2021 $2,158,969 $2,593,401 $2,976,239
2022 $2,155,974 $2,562,111 $2,948,787
2023 $2,157,451 $2,577,644 $2,939,425
2024 $2,120,846 $2,554,443 $2,974,845
2025 $2,164,801 $2,596,961 $2,975,335
2026 $2,159,990 $2,579,632 $2,966,675
2027 $2,150,392 $2,595,832 $2,973,715
2028 $2,160,778 $2,587,333 $2,976,734
2029 $2,163,895 $2,593,600 $2,974,830
2030 $2,151,566 $2,583,764 $2,939,283
2031 $2,164,796 $2,596,533 $2,981,384
2032 $2,162,524 $2,596,594 $2,981,519
2033 $2,164,330 $2,596,774 $2,981,235
2034 $2,161,290 $2,596,781 $2,979,862
2035 $2,164,013 $2,596,995 $2,981,382
2036 $2,163,878 $2,597,268 $2,981,718
2037 $2,162,397 $2,596,801 $2,978,314
Average $2,158,826 $2,588,987 $2,972,051
Total $43,176,513 $51,779,743 $59,441,020
The results above show budget representation annually and that differs from the City’s reconstruction budget that
is bonded every 3 years. Although the budgets could not be compared directly, the average and total annual
budget over a period of 20 years could be compared to determine if the City’s current funding is sufficient to
maintain and improve the condition of the roadways.
The current annual budget is insufficient to maintain the current weighted average PCI. Based on an iterative
review of the total budget it shows that a budget increase of 8 to 10 percent per year would better match the
maintenance needs.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 21
Figure IVc. Annual funding required to maintain desired weighted average PCI.
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 Average
WE
I
G
H
T
E
D
A
V
E
R
A
G
E
P
C
I
YEARS
TARGET PCI DRIVEN ANNUAL FUNDING
65 PCI Maintain Current PCI 75 PCI
Pavement Management Report
Page | 22
RECOMMENDATIONS AND 5-YEAR CIP
Using the PAVER software analysis, different alternatives were run to determine the optimal actions to extend the
pavement life in a most cost-effective manner. The key to achieving that goal is performing maintenance when it
is required to preserve the road structure.
It is recommended to maintain a roadway network condition under PCI rating of at least 70 in the long term. To
achieve this goal, the funding of maintenance activities should be increased by 8 to 10 percent per year. It is
recommended to allocate additional funding to preserve “marginal” roadways such as mill and overlay and Texas
Underseal. These maintenance activities are cost effective and increase the pavement life if applied at the
appropriate time. Roadways that are in need of reconstruction prior to the City being able to fund could be
considered with a temporary solution such as chip sealing to hold the pavement together. WSB recommended the
City perform preventative maintenance treatments in the early life of the pavement, normally within the first 5
years, as it would be the optimum time frame to maximize its performance.
A 5-year CIP from 2018 to 2022 was developed based on the funding information provided by the City. Upon
reviewing the roadways that are currently under the “problem” category, it would take the City roughly 15 years to
reconstruct all these roadways. There would also be roadways that are currently under the “marginal” category
that will be gradually deteriorating into the “problem” category if there is no increase in funding to lengthen the
service life of these streets.
A map showing the 5-year project areas and a spreadsheet presenting the respective project cost are attached to
the report. This is intended to be used as a guide and assist engineers in decision making on road maintenance.
Other factors such as scheduling of other projects, use of the road, expected life, cost, public perception should
also be considered.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 23
A PPENDICES
Pavement Management Report
Page | 24
APPENDIX A
PAVEMENT PCI MAP
Figure A.1. Map showing PCI category and recommended maintenance activity for all the roadways in the City of
Lino Lakes.
Pavement Management Report
Page | 25
APPENDIX B
PAVEMENT PCI RATINGS
Table B.1. PCI ratings for each bituminous segment, recommended maintenance activity for each segment was
based on visual inspection. Streets with Section ID “TBD” are newer roadways that do not have Section ID
assigned to them yet.
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
81st Stree 49 1,034.25 24. 24,822.02 .00 Reconstruction
Diane Cour 192 46. 30. 1,380.00 .00 Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr 342 281.22 28. 7,874.25 .00 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 463 1,966.13 24. 47,187.11 .00 Reconstruction
Shadow Lak 494 3,327.36 24. 79,856.69 .00 Reconstruction
Woodland D 636 1,363.65 22. 30,000.38 .00 Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr 978 839.32 28. 23,501.00 .00 Reconstruction
Lamotte Ci 1221 825.63 28. 23,117.68 .00 Reconstruction
Shadow Cou 480 281.94 28. 7,894.29 .29 Reconstruction
Shadow Lak 485 3,362.7 24. 80,704.83 2.44 Reconstruction
Diane Cour 191 213.71 30. 6,411.27 4.23 Reconstruction
Danube Str 177 502.41 30. 15,072.20 5.23 Reconstruction
Shadow Lak 493 846.5 24. 20,315.95 5.66 Reconstruction
Carl Stree 132 1,315.64 24. 31,575.40 6.22 Reconstruction
4th Avenue 22 1,363.48 24. 32,723.57 8.28 Reconstruction
Evergreen 215 1,135.21 28. 31,785.92 8.28 Reconstruction
Orange Str 674 827.17 28. 23,160.69 8.28 Reconstruction
Sandpiper 473 333.47 22. 7,336.28 9.08 Reconstruction
4th Avenue 20 3,837.56 24. 92,101.38 9.31 Reconstruction
Shadow Lak 487 330.57 24. 7,933.69 11.45 Reconstruction
Rehbein St 443 2,080.78 30. 62,423.29 11.51 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 465 1,349.3 24. 32,383.19 11.51 Reconstruction
Red Maple 439 431.72 28. 12,088.14 12.69 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 455 1,682.02 24. 40,368.41 12.72 Reconstruction
Karth Road 317 1,220.16 30. 36,604.77 12.99 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 464 2,602.66 24. 62,463.92 13.93 Reconstruction
81st Stree 1000 1,252.54 24. 30,060.85 13.93 Reconstruction
Evergreen 214 884.24 30. 26,527.32 14.52 Reconstruction
Red Maple 441 1,110.58 28. 31,096.32 14.92 Reconstruction
Peltier La 408 2,901.63 22. 63,835.82 16.42 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 462 1,293.84 24. 31,052.16 16.42 Reconstruction
Olive Stre 673 799.32 24. 19,183.66 16.64 Reconstruction
Nordin Str 1261 221.45 28. 6,200.48 16.64 Reconstruction
Oak Lane 663 2,256.07 18. 40,609.26 16.66 Reconstruction
Joyer Lane 316 1,971.86 30. 59,155.73 16.99 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 456 2,471.38 24. 59,313.17 17.68 Reconstruction
Main St 1260 623.84 22. 13,724.41 17.68 Reconstruction
Pavement Management Report
Page | 26
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Red Maple 438 1,514.78 28. 42,413.94 18.31 Reconstruction
Gaage Lane 235 831.47 30. 24,944.13 18.99 Reconstruction
Diane Stre 193 1,549.55 30. 46,486.35 19.85 Reconstruction
64th Stree 30 708.41 24. 17,001.94 19.99 Reconstruction
Rondeau La 458 1,505.11 24. 36,122.74 20.25 Reconstruction
Canfield R 128 562.4 30. 16,872.13 20.99 Reconstruction
Gladstone 1020 643.49 22. 14,156.73 21.55 Reconstruction
Olive Stre 672 498.4 24. 11,961.64 22.00 Reconstruction
Gordon Ave 249 452.92 30. 13,587.58 22.88 Reconstruction
Lamotte Dr 344 306.84 28. 8,591.39 22.88 Reconstruction
Diane Stre 194 510.87 30. 15,326.12 25.26 Reconstruction
Rustic Lan 471 784.51 18. 14,121.26 25.54 Reconstruction
Otter Lake 679 1,242.77 24. 29,826.47 25.99 Reconstruction
64th Stree 1001 374.3 24. 8,983.14 25.99 Reconstruction
Evergreen 213 502.57 28. 14,071.87 26.35 Reconstruction
Gordon Ave 250 224.41 30. 6,732.44 26.91 Reconstruction
Talle Lane 541 1,129.55 30. 33,886.43 26.99 Reconstruction
Holly Driv 1008 3,893.9 24. 93,453.50 27.99 Reconstruction
James Stre 307 2,202.17 28. 61,660.81 28.55 Reconstruction
Knoll Driv 989 1,018.61 28. 28,520.95 30.76 Reconstruction
Fairmont D 216 603.96 22. 13,287.12 30.99 Reconstruction
77th Stree 37 2,086.95 22. 45,912.94 31.04 Reconstruction
Lakeview D 1042 1,307.31 24. 31,375.34 32.39 Reconstruction
Old Birch 671a 900. 24. 21,600.00 33.74 Reconstruction
Cedar Stre 135 727.81 28. 20,378.54 33.98 Reconstruction
Barbara La 994 542.71 28. 15,195.98 35.18 Reconstruction
Lakeview D 1045 1,316.06 24. 31,585.36 36.63 Reconstruction
77th Stree 38 623.83 22. 13,724.31 38.03 Reconstruction
Glenview D 244 629.58 22. 13,850.70 38.03 Reconstruction
Karth Road 318 454.09 30. 13,622.73 38.99 Reconstruction
Timberwolf 563 260.05 32. 8,321.73 38.99 Reconstruction
Gladstone 239 619.12 22. 13,620.61 39.39 Reconstruction
Oak Lane 662 2,012.74 24. 48,305.77 39.67 Reconstruction
Holly Driv 1012 725.8 18. 13,064.38 39.99 Reconstruction
Fairmont D 217 620.08 22. 13,641.83 40.75 Preservation
Buckthorn 127 499.75 28. 13,992.97 40.99 Preservation
Ware Road 597 2,630.32 35. 92,061.03 41.06 Preservation
81st Stree 50 414.95 30. 12,448.61 41.89 Preservation
Maple Stre 389 926.16 24. 22,227.85 41.89 Preservation
Timberwolf 564 423.35 30. 12,700.56 42.99 Preservation
77th Stree 40 1,264.26 24. 30,342.29 43.01 Preservation
Glenview D 1098 654.96 22. 14,409.20 43.45 Preservation
Orange Str 675 1,017.34 24. 24,416.21 44.10 Preservation
Black Duck 111 498.04 28. 13,945.05 44.68 Preservation
Shadow Lak 491 498. 40. 19,920.01 44.69 Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 27
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
White Owl 612 726.1 28. 20,330.73 44.69 Preservation
Lakeview D 1044 1,324.03 24. 31,776.80 44.74 Preservation
Merganser 642 552.48 28. 15,469.31 44.99 Preservation
Terra Cour 556 365.9 28. 10,245.23 45.20 Preservation
Fox Road 228 634.26 28. 17,759.20 45.85 Preservation
Hickory Pl 269 184.68 28. 5,171.18 45.85 Preservation
Shadow Lak 489 157.15 40. 6,286.14 45.85 Preservation
Pondview C 426 425.13 28. 11,903.77 46.00 Preservation
Black Duck 109 327.33 28. 9,165.35 46.99 Preservation
Black Duck 112 149.05 28. 4,173.46 46.99 Preservation
Pheasant R 418 505.22 28. 14,146.15 46.99 Preservation
Pheasant H 412 323.44 28. 9,056.46 47.00 Preservation
Whitetail 618 335.73 28. 9,400.42 47.00 Preservation
Whitetail 619 555.9 28. 15,565.07 47.00 Preservation
Painted Tu 681 475.27 28. 13,307.45 47.00 Preservation
Glenview D 245 475.3 22. 10,456.61 47.17 Preservation
Service Ro 477 459.65 24. 11,031.54 47.18 Preservation
81st Stree 51 348.44 30. 10,453.14 47.37 Preservation
Sherman La 504 481.81 28. 13,490.76 48.00 Preservation
Sherman La 506 458.41 28. 12,835.48 48.00 Preservation
Timberwolf 565 468.54 28. 13,119.00 48.00 Preservation
White Oak 608 496.75 28. 13,908.99 48.00 Preservation
White Oak 611 851.52 28. 23,842.47 48.00 Preservation
Fox Road 229 1,056.47 28. 29,581.07 48.11 Preservation
Shadow Lak 488 212.57 44. 9,353.15 48.11 Preservation
Gladstone 236 345.46 27. 9,327.45 48.32 Preservation
Chokecherr 146 425.07 28. 11,902.09 49.00 Preservation
Chokecherr 147 476.68 28. 13,347.18 49.00 Preservation
Sherman La 505 611.38 28. 17,118.68 49.00 Preservation
Linda Lane 371 331.96 28. 9,294.90 49.18 Preservation
Shadow Lak 495 387.87 40. 15,514.99 49.20 Preservation
Green Bria 254 909.65 27. 24,560.61 49.42 Preservation
Ulmer Driv 588 928.32 27. 25,064.77 49.42 Preservation
Bloom Cour 121 471.38 24. 11,313.02 50.00 Preservation
Sherman La 498 228.81 28. 6,406.61 50.00 Preservation
White Pine 616 907.32 28. 25,404.83 50.24 Preservation
Lonesome P 384 333.82 28. 9,347.08 50.26 Preservation
Post Road 429 845.27 27. 22,822.36 50.45 Preservation
Stage Coac 524 589.36 28. 16,502.16 50.45 Preservation
Nancy Driv 963 1,156.26 30. 34,687.86 50.51 Preservation
Meadow Cou 403 585.34 28. 16,389.56 50.52 Preservation
Sherman La 503 515.82 28. 14,442.98 51.00 Preservation
Timberwolf 558 212.71 48. 10,210.19 51.00 Preservation
White Oak 610 232.67 28. 6,514.75 51.00 Preservation
Black Duck 113 1,651.78 28. 46,249.76 51.29 Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 28
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Deerwood L 182 988.09 28. 27,666.55 51.29 Preservation
Hawthorn R 263 595.49 28. 16,673.86 51.29 Preservation
River Birc 450 769.47 28. 21,545.14 51.29 Preservation
Shadow Lak 490 417.52 40. 16,700.79 51.29 Preservation
77th Stree 39 551.34 24. 13,232.15 51.54 Preservation
Elbe Stree 203 864.09 30. 25,922.68 51.55 Preservation
White Oak 609 452.9 28. 12,681.25 52.00 Preservation
Linda Lane 372 1,038.94 28. 29,090.32 52.28 Preservation
Lantern La 356 555.84 28. 15,563.47 52.30 Preservation
Elbe Stree 202 176.81 30. 5,304.16 52.55 Preservation
Sherman La 501 1,077.87 28. 30,180.40 53.00 Preservation
Timberwolf 560 585.73 28. 16,400.32 53.00 Preservation
Kingfisher 324 489.63 28. 13,709.73 53.29 Preservation
Lonesome P 386 523.07 28. 14,646.07 53.29 Preservation
Stage Coac 525 290.98 28. 8,147.39 53.39 Preservation
Antelope D 62 333.29 27. 8,998.79 53.41 Preservation
Heather Co 265 477.66 28. 13,374.47 53.55 Preservation
Timberwolf 559 268.49 28. 7,517.74 54.00 Preservation
Black Duck 117 487.35 28. 13,645.91 54.25 Preservation
Shadow Lak 482 558.28 28. 15,631.90 54.25 Preservation
Fox Circle 970 172.58 28. 4,832.27 54.25 Preservation
Stage Coac 527 344.65 28. 9,650.09 54.32 Preservation
Lakeview D 1043 1,324.57 24. 31,789.58 54.32 Preservation
Rondeau La 461 678.16 24. 16,275.86 54.34 Preservation
Snow Owl C 518 393.24 28. 11,010.71 54.34 Preservation
Shadow Lak 496 538.01 40. 21,520.27 55.21 Preservation
Green Bria 255 383.98 27. 10,367.36 55.25 Preservation
Sherman La 497 101.66 50. 5,083.17 56.00 Preservation
Fawn Lane 218 801.77 28. 22,449.59 56.15 Preservation
Linden Lan 373 1,317.35 28. 36,885.74 56.15 Preservation
Painted Tu 682 462.93 28. 12,961.91 56.15 Preservation
Coyote Tra 990 746.54 28. 20,903.23 56.15 Preservation
Eva Street 212 325.3 30. 9,758.88 56.48 Preservation
Velvetleaf 591 277.51 28. 7,770.18 57.00 Preservation
Hunters Ri 1019 983.24 28. 27,530.59 57.00 Preservation
Antelope D 61 176.27 27. 4,759.28 57.04 Preservation
Caribou Ci 130 363.44 27. 9,812.89 57.04 Preservation
Wildflower 622 603.94 27. 16,306.30 57.04 Preservation
Sandhill D 472 891.46 28. 24,960.97 57.07 Preservation
Fox Road 225 164.01 28. 4,592.39 57.09 Preservation
Ironwood C 301 220.62 28. 6,177.37 57.09 Preservation
Gladstone 237 383.23 28. 10,730.46 57.93 Preservation
Beaver Tra 99 533.67 28. 14,942.84 58.02 Preservation
Black Duck 119 583.36 28. 16,333.97 58.02 Preservation
Coyote Tra 169 377.63 28. 10,573.72 58.02 Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 29
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
River Birc 449 651.6 28. 18,244.72 58.02 Preservation
Shadow Lak 492 330.6 40. 13,224.00 58.02 Preservation
Coyote Tra 991 773.45 28. 21,656.68 58.02 Preservation
Cinnamon T 148 340.37 28. 9,530.36 58.81 Preservation
Gray Heron 252 1,159.3 28. 32,460.27 58.81 Preservation
Sunfish Co 529 265.92 27. 7,179.95 58.81 Preservation
White Pine 613 208.48 28. 5,837.45 58.93 Preservation
Birch Cour 104 128.65 28. 3,602.09 58.95 Preservation
Fox Road 231 341.13 28. 9,551.61 58.95 Preservation
Lonesome P 385 861.99 28. 24,135.75 58.95 Preservation
James Stre 308 441.9 28. 12,373.22 59.38 Preservation
Antelope D 63 483.83 27. 13,063.48 59.70 Preservation
Ware Road 601 1,461.14 35. 51,139.83 59.85 Preservation
Linda Circ 368 204.02 28. 5,712.59 59.86 Preservation
Linda Cour 369 471.93 28. 13,214.00 59.86 Preservation
Black Duck 108 1,146.55 28. 32,103.31 59.88 Preservation
Coyote Cou 166 335.28 28. 9,387.98 59.88 Preservation
Deerwood L 184 230.13 28. 6,443.58 59.88 Preservation
Fawn Lane 219 222.84 28. 6,239.49 59.88 Preservation
Lonesome P 387 586.24 28. 16,414.79 59.88 Preservation
Coyote Tra 992 337.94 28. 9,462.24 59.88 Preservation
Sherman La 507 323.88 28. 9,068.54 60.00 Preservation
Elm Street 1034 342.61 28. 9,592.96 60.56 Preservation
Pelican Pl 406 1,381.83 28. 38,691.31 60.78 Preservation
Black Duck 114 695.19 28. 19,465.39 60.81 Preservation
Deerwood L 188 484.75 28. 13,573.02 60.81 Preservation
Red Hawk T 436 296.05 28. 8,289.35 60.81 Preservation
Ruffed Gro 469 630.7 28. 17,659.64 61.00 Preservation
Lea Court 361 360.56 28. 10,095.67 61.29 Preservation
Grey Squir 259 336.03 27. 9,072.79 61.48 Preservation
Snow Owl L 519 1,361.26 28. 38,115.25 61.48 Preservation
Sunflower 531 208.05 27. 5,617.41 61.48 Preservation
Ware Road 603 309.33 35. 10,826.59 61.71 Preservation
Ware Road 944 541.64 35. 18,957.30 61.71 Preservation
Deerwood L 183 222.91 28. 6,241.45 61.74 Preservation
Cedar Stre 136 646.25 28. 18,095.02 61.99 Preservation
Sunrise Dr 535 1,002.59 24. 24,062.24 62.36 Preservation
Sunrise Ro 537 316.38 24. 7,593.19 62.36 Preservation
Smoketree 515 603.1 27. 16,283.63 62.38 Preservation
Snow Owl L 520 355.28 28. 9,947.87 62.38 Preservation
Ruffed Gro 468 356.88 28. 9,992.67 63.00 Preservation
4th Avenue 24 1,327. 36. 47,771.89 63.22 Preservation
Forsham La 223 678.22 28. 18,990.06 63.25 Preservation
62nd Avenu 28 404.34 22. 8,895.52 63.61 Preservation
Deerwood L 187 488.17 28. 13,668.72 63.61 Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 30
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Killdeer D 321 157.83 28. 4,419.34 63.61 Preservation
White Birc 607 578.28 28. 16,191.97 63.61 Preservation
Painted Tu 680 152.35 28. 4,265.75 63.61 Preservation
Ruffed Gro 470 269.59 28. 7,548.39 64.00 Preservation
Wildflower 621 332.98 27. 8,990.56 64.18 Preservation
Linda Aven 366 182.4 28. 5,107.30 64.53 Preservation
Black Duck 105 408.99 28. 11,451.61 64.55 Preservation
Black Duck 116 426.27 28. 11,935.69 64.55 Preservation
Deerwood C 180 118.79 28. 3,326.12 64.55 Preservation
Deerwood C 181 278.92 60. 16,735.12 64.55 Preservation
Deerwood L 186 441.88 28. 12,372.67 64.55 Preservation
Hawthorn R 262 1,981.44 28. 55,480.19 64.55 Preservation
Pheasant R 420 961.49 28. 26,921.76 64.55 Preservation
Lacasse Dr 330 505.51 28. 14,154.39 64.99 Preservation
Wild Turke 620 699.72 28. 19,592.09 65.00 Preservation
Grey Squir 257 269.67 27. 7,281.13 65.10 Preservation
Sunflower 532 445.65 27. 12,032.56 65.10 Preservation
4th Avenue 19 479.09 41. 19,642.58 65.15 Preservation
77th Stree 41 747.25 24. 17,934.05 65.15 Preservation
77th Stree 43 494.79 24. 11,875.02 65.15 Preservation
Egret Lane 198 183.77 28. 5,145.53 65.47 Preservation
Black Duck 106 318.12 28. 8,907.46 65.49 Preservation
Deerwood L 185 1,241.63 28. 34,765.53 65.49 Preservation
Hawthorn R 264 383.2 28. 10,729.48 65.50 Preservation
Elm Street 1037 361.28 28. 10,115.85 65.99 Preservation
Ruffed Gro 467 362.32 28. 10,145.08 66.00 Preservation
Phelps Roa 421 1,317.58 28. 36,892.35 66.02 Preservation
Egret Lane 199 449.97 28. 12,599.19 66.41 Preservation
White Pine 615 576.51 27. 15,565.79 66.42 Preservation
Killdeer D 1342 561.96 28. 15,734.91 66.44 Preservation
Sunrise Dr 536 1,317.04 24. 31,608.98 66.91 Preservation
Mourning D 644 334.37 27. 9,027.95 66.93 Preservation
Blue Heron 123 639.44 28. 17,904.43 67.36 Preservation
Woodridge 227 262.11 27. 7,076.91 67.37 Preservation
Laurene Av 357 674.81 24. 16,195.42 67.37 Preservation
Linda Aven 367 379.91 28. 10,637.47 67.37 Preservation
Black Duck 110 249.71 28. 6,991.89 67.39 Preservation
Pheasant R 995 398.79 28. 11,166.25 67.39 Preservation
Sunrise Dr 533 586.04 24. 14,064.88 67.83 Preservation
Sunrise Ro 539 505.07 24. 12,121.72 67.83 Preservation
Red Clover 435 593.99 27. 16,037.72 67.85 Preservation
Timberwolf 566 461.78 28. 12,929.75 67.99 Preservation
Egret Lane 200 418.81 28. 11,726.56 68.31 Preservation
Baldwin La 95 557.36 28. 15,606.20 68.32 Preservation
Beaver Cir 98 528.5 28. 14,798.07 68.34 Preservation
Pavement Management Report
Page | 31
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Red Hawk T 437 267.34 28. 7,485.63 68.34 Preservation
Shadow Lak 481 407.5 28. 11,409.94 68.34 Preservation
Robinson D 1163 40. 32. 1,279.99 68.50 Preservation
Stage Coac 526 251.53 28. 7,042.93 68.75 Preservation
Antelope D 60 167.45 27. 4,521.09 68.78 Preservation
Glenview D 243 363.24 28. 10,170.76 68.78 Preservation
Whippoorwi 606 1,328.92 28. 37,209.62 68.78 Preservation
Lacasse Co 326 236.65 28. 6,626.17 68.99 Preservation
Timberwolf 562 900.02 28. 25,200.68 68.99 Preservation
Marilyn Dr 396 1,043.5 28. 29,217.87 69.03 Preservation
Blue Heron 122 474.95 28. 13,298.57 69.27 Preservation
Egret Lane 201 463.8 28. 12,986.38 69.27 Preservation
Laurene Av 358 285.07 24. 6,841.74 69.27 Preservation
Laurene Av 360 469.8 24. 11,275.31 69.27 Preservation
Mallard La 388 336.68 28. 9,427.15 69.29 Preservation
Sioux Cour 509 167.97 28. 4,703.11 69.61 Preservation
Post Road 428 442.11 27. 11,936.89 69.68 Preservation
Gray Heron 253 374.16 28. 10,476.60 69.70 Preservation
Teal Court 551 649.85 28. 18,195.77 69.99 Preservation
Cripple Cr 174 281.38 28. 7,878.69 70.00 Preservation
Oakwood La 669 586.89 28. 16,433.03 70.23 Preventative Maintenance
Crystal Co 176 188.57 28. 5,279.89 70.25 Preventative Maintenance
Fawn Lane 221 698.35 28. 19,553.70 70.25 Preventative Maintenance
Shadow Lak 483 2,166.98 28. 60,675.46 70.25 Preventative Maintenance
Partridge 694 798.56 28. 22,359.54 70.25 Preventative Maintenance
Gray Heron 251 328.72 28. 9,204.05 70.63 Preventative Maintenance
Tele Lane 555 377.34 28. 10,565.59 70.99 Preventative Maintenance
Laurene Av 359 558.16 24. 13,395.79 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Linda Aven 365 935.44 24. 22,450.60 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Rohavic La 452 477.35 30. 14,320.42 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Schlavin C 476 478.18 30. 14,345.44 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge 638 1,058.86 27. 28,589.13 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge 640 1,442.32 27. 38,942.53 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Baldwin La 1139 1,802.72 21. 37,857.03 71.18 Preventative Maintenance
Lantern Ci 354 582.03 28. 16,296.81 71.20 Preventative Maintenance
Lantern La 355 527.05 28. 14,757.53 71.20 Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane 1004 450. 36. 16,200.15 71.53 Preventative Maintenance
Mourning D 646 486.18 27. 13,126.76 71.55 Preventative Maintenance
Royal Pine 1179 531.68 24. 12,760.24 71.99 Preventative Maintenance
Rohavic La 451 445.45 30. 13,363.43 72.14 Preventative Maintenance
Black Duck 115 311.55 28. 8,723.35 72.16 Preventative Maintenance
Red Birch 434 575.19 28. 16,105.19 72.16 Preventative Maintenance
Muskrat Ru 647 330.87 28. 9,264.38 72.16 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 149 213.72 28. 5,984.29 72.99 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road 942 624.98 35. 21,874.40 73.08 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 32
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Oakwood Dr 668 570.25 28. 15,966.90 73.09 Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer C 319 155.02 28. 4,340.44 73.11 Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D 323 331.7 28. 9,287.57 73.11 Preventative Maintenance
Smoketree 516 328.43 27. 8,867.58 73.37 Preventative Maintenance
Mourning D 645 370.89 27. 10,013.93 73.37 Preventative Maintenance
Wolf Circl 623 310.25 28. 8,687.13 73.99 Preventative Maintenance
Black Duck 118 408.25 28. 11,430.97 74.06 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road 230 505.97 28. 14,167.09 74.06 Preventative Maintenance
Partridge 693 719.48 28. 20,145.39 74.06 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1041 1,070.99 28. 29,987.83 74.24 Preventative Maintenance
Sunrise Ro 540 864.64 24. 20,751.27 74.25 Preventative Maintenance
Sunflower 530 319.95 27. 8,638.58 74.27 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road 599 1,044.55 35. 36,559.41 74.97 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 155 936.05 28. 26,209.32 74.99 Preventative Maintenance
Ellen Cour 204 200.22 28. 5,606.18 74.99 Preventative Maintenance
Service Ro 479 1,360.61 24. 32,654.68 75.17 Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue 1169 546.4 24. 13,113.60 75.19 Preventative Maintenance
White Pine 614 1,216.94 27. 32,857.39 75.92 Preventative Maintenance
Woodridge 639 1,378.79 27. 37,227.28 75.92 Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane 85 641.59 28. 17,964.54 75.94 Preventative Maintenance
Tamarack L 542 571.01 28. 15,988.15 75.94 Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane 1220 163.72 28. 4,584.06 75.94 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 584 253.57 28. 7,099.95 76.00 Preventative Maintenance
Sunrise Dr 534 451.15 24. 10,827.66 76.02 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Lane 664 839.41 24. 20,145.84 76.83 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1040 597.38 28. 16,726.67 76.87 Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane 1005 303.17 24. 7,276.01 76.88 Preventative Maintenance
Jane Avenu 1211 182.97 32. 5,855.12 76.93 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 334 200.94 36. 7,233.77 76.99 Preventative Maintenance
Tele Drive 553 630.87 28. 17,664.50 76.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X 579 398.45 28. 11,156.60 76.99 Preventative Maintenance
Oakwood La 670 529.94 28. 14,838.32 77.24 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1036 591.06 28. 16,549.55 77.72 Preventative Maintenance
Grey Squir 258 330.8 27. 8,931.70 77.75 Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D 320 126.84 28. 3,551.58 77.79 Preventative Maintenance
77th Stree 42 1,245.88 24. 29,901.17 77.80 Preventative Maintenance
Glen Circl 240 263.6 28. 7,380.88 77.80 Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La 502 1,593. 28. 44,603.98 77.99 Preventative Maintenance
Tele Lane 554 355. 28. 9,939.93 77.99 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1033 338.98 28. 9,491.36 78.55 Preventative Maintenance
Country La 161 1,410.53 28. 39,494.86 78.71 Preventative Maintenance
South Glen 993 518.93 28. 14,530.10 78.71 Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Cou 1226 432.7 26. 11,250.31 78.74 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 336 418.4 28. 11,715.14 78.99 Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La 500 497.55 28. 13,931.43 78.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 33
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Elmcrest A 1187 914.95 24. 21,958.86 78.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 582 322.35 28. 9,025.91 79.00 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 583 218.77 28. 6,125.43 79.00 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1032 358.5 28. 10,038.09 79.37 Preventative Maintenance
Elmcrest A 1233 5,618.32 28. 157,313.07 79.41 Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane 370 313.36 28. 8,774.20 79.58 Preventative Maintenance
Hollow Lan 286 483.47 28. 13,537.15 79.61 Preventative Maintenance
South Glen 521 134.39 28. 3,763.01 79.61 Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr 391 424.87 28. 11,896.28 79.69 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 331 407.35 28. 11,405.87 79.99 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Ci 981 244.03 28. 6,832.95 79.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 585 402.08 28. 11,258.27 80.00 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 973 583. 24. 13,991.94 80.00 Preventative Maintenance
Marshan Co 1197 142. 24. 3,408.00 80.20 Preventative Maintenance
Northern L 1002 356.47 36. 12,832.98 80.21 Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane 83 581.93 28. 16,293.92 80.50 Preventative Maintenance
Killdeer D 322 259.27 28. 7,259.63 80.50 Preventative Maintenance
Hollow Lan 285 656.85 28. 18,391.71 80.51 Preventative Maintenance
South Glen 522 497.24 28. 13,922.73 80.51 Preventative Maintenance
South Glen 523 360.14 28. 10,083.95 80.51 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1038 973.6 28. 27,260.91 80.95 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 158 679.17 28. 19,016.69 80.99 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Co 980 275.07 28. 7,701.98 80.99 Preventative Maintenance
Country La 160 221.95 28. 6,214.69 81.38 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1035 485.57 28. 13,595.97 81.72 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1039 338.31 28. 9,472.69 81.72 Preventative Maintenance
Ulmer Driv 589 643.14 27. 17,364.71 81.75 Preventative Maintenance
Arthur Cou 82 548.51 28. 15,358.32 81.99 Preventative Maintenance
62nd Avenu 26 962.39 22. 21,172.62 82.25 Preventative Maintenance
Shadow Lak 484 1,614.28 44. 71,028.18 82.25 Preventative Maintenance
Park Court 1198 560.53 32. 17,937.07 82.47 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu 7 908.46 30. 27,253.68 82.51 Preventative Maintenance
Quarter Ho 433 285.91 28. 8,005.42 82.51 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 332 529.47 28. 14,825.11 82.99 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 333 764.35 28. 21,401.89 82.99 Preventative Maintenance
Fawn Lane 220 473.24 28. 13,250.60 83.10 Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D 1168 83.28 24. 1,998.66 83.20 Preventative Maintenance
Ulmer Driv 590 374.1 27. 10,100.58 83.24 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 293 244.96 24. 5,879.01 83.99 Preventative Maintenance
Osprey Cou 676 522.81 28. 14,638.73 83.99 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 972 286.99 24. 6,887.78 83.99 Preventative Maintenance
Cherokee T 142 514.12 28. 14,395.43 84.00 Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac 1202 174.38 32. 5,580.01 84.54 Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac 1218 342.39 32. 10,956.47 84.63 Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake 447 1,775.14 28. 49,703.83 84.66 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 34
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
62nd Avenu 29 2,312.63 22. 50,877.78 84.74 Preventative Maintenance
Prairie Fl 431 573.47 28. 16,057.15 84.74 Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou 1177 472.65 24. 11,343.50 84.75 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Hollow 1178 975.99 24. 23,423.65 84.75 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 152 350.46 28. 9,813.01 84.99 Preventative Maintenance
Mineral Po 643 418.24 28. 11,710.67 85.00 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 974 759.85 24. 18,236.33 85.00 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 1254 155.6 90. 14,003.62 85.00 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 1258 481.23 40. 19,249.26 85.36 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu 6 386.02 34. 13,124.58 85.37 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road 605 570.86 28. 15,984.19 85.56 Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra 1154 553.68 26. 14,395.68 85.56 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Hollow 1256 146.51 24. 3,516.33 85.57 Preventative Maintenance
Country La 162 160.19 28. 4,485.32 85.60 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 546 327.35 28. 9,165.87 85.99 Preventative Maintenance
Meadowlark 641 243.02 28. 6,804.70 85.99 Preventative Maintenance
Cripple Cr 173 785.08 28. 21,982.11 86.00 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 975 899.25 24. 21,582.02 86.00 Preventative Maintenance
Cherokee T 1090 324.38 28. 9,082.66 86.00 Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Circl 1227 2,399.37 24. 57,584.90 86.01 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 574 755.64 44. 33,248.17 86.04 Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr 395 1,313.32 28. 36,772.83 86.17 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 683 358.32 28. 10,033.08 86.17 Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane 511 357.95 28. 10,022.68 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane 512 637.27 28. 17,843.61 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane 513 288.98 28. 8,091.40 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Circl 596 205.75 28. 5,761.12 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Ojibway Pa 1158 1,098.61 26. 28,563.91 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road 1170 677.42 24. 16,258.04 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T 1232 263.44 28. 7,376.25 86.37 Preventative Maintenance
62nd Avenu 27 617.37 22. 13,582.09 86.41 Preventative Maintenance
Aspen Lane 84 183.19 28. 5,129.41 86.41 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R 1341 1,505.62 28. 42,157.34 86.41 Preventative Maintenance
Marshan La 400 937.69 20. 18,753.85 86.71 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 575 343.94 44. 15,133.44 86.71 Preventative Maintenance
Villiage D 595 791.85 22. 17,420.77 86.71 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 150 407.74 32. 13,047.74 86.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X 577 794.74 28. 22,252.78 86.99 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan 1105 700.16 25. 17,504.03 86.99 Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan 1110 527.69 24. 12,664.57 86.99 Preventative Maintenance
Molitor Dr 1133 781.29 28. 21,876.25 86.99 Preventative Maintenance
Cripple Cr 172 345.49 28. 9,673.61 87.00 Preventative Maintenance
Nancy Driv 962 392.88 30. 11,786.51 87.06 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 685 802.71 28. 22,476.00 87.07 Preventative Maintenance
Patti Driv 696 736.81 30. 22,104.16 87.07 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 35
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Lilac Stre 1191 895.31 28. 25,068.75 87.07 Preventative Maintenance
Lilac Stre 1264 1,787.89 28. 50,060.79 87.07 Preventative Maintenance
Prairie Fl 430 243.04 28. 6,805.01 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Look 514 736.32 28. 20,616.83 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Ware Road 947 241.05 28. 6,749.51 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra 1156 223.63 26. 5,814.48 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 1224 276.04 24. 6,625.02 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Sioux Lane 1335 184.82 28. 5,174.96 87.17 Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane 1174 444.2 24. 10,660.69 87.18 Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou 1175 350.55 24. 8,413.10 87.18 Preventative Maintenance
Ravens Cou 1176 530.55 24. 12,733.10 87.18 Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake 446 528.29 28. 14,792.00 87.37 Preventative Maintenance
NULL 1333 527.78 40. 21,111.16 87.37 Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac 1200 132.46 32. 4,238.57 87.49 Preventative Maintenance
79th Stree 46 441.7 28. 12,367.72 87.95 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Court 661 369.63 28. 10,349.73 87.95 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 1222 520.44 30. 15,613.09 87.95 Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane 101 788.39 28. 22,074.81 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Savanna Co 475 423.97 26. 11,023.26 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 1171 186.25 24. 4,470.09 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 1172 759.48 24. 18,227.45 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra 1225 198. 26. 5,148.00 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree 1323 3,845.98 30. 115,379.53 87.96 Preventative Maintenance
Linda Lane 1173 229.38 24. 5,505.16 87.97 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 157 735.8 28. 20,602.44 87.98 Preventative Maintenance
65th Stree 1007 750.34 24. 18,008.13 87.98 Preventative Maintenance
Cassiopeia 134 360.15 28. 10,084.21 88.00 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 292 449.4 24. 10,785.70 88.00 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 581 221.88 28. 6,212.61 88.00 Preventative Maintenance
Hudson Tra 997 673.47 28. 18,857.15 88.00 Preventative Maintenance
Carpenter 1161 343.42 32. 10,989.38 88.00 Preventative Maintenance
Rice Lake 448 1,768.77 28. 49,525.43 88.02 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 1195 618.36 40. 24,734.31 88.02 Preventative Maintenance
Villiage D 1196 863.82 40. 34,552.95 88.02 Preventative Maintenance
Woods Edge 1223 667.74 40. 26,709.71 88.02 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 1337 325.76 28. 9,121.24 88.16 Preventative Maintenance
20th Ave S 1340 1,241.77 28. 34,769.50 88.16 Preventative Maintenance
Otter Lake 1343 599.34 28. 16,781.65 88.16 Preventative Maintenance
Town Cente 1336 598.07 40. 23,922.88 88.66 Preventative Maintenance
Peltier La 409 655.88 22. 14,429.43 88.67 Preventative Maintenance
Rondeau La 457 3,088.24 24. 74,117.72 88.67 Preventative Maintenance
Lakota Tra 1155 61.85 26. 1,608.09 88.75 Preventative Maintenance
79th Stree 45 763.09 28. 21,366.43 88.84 Preventative Maintenance
Highland D 274 488.15 28. 13,668.17 88.84 Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane 1102 441.19 29. 12,794.46 88.84 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 36
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Patti Driv 695 663.19 30. 19,895.59 88.85 Preventative Maintenance
Thomas Str 999 1,349.47 30. 40,484.17 88.85 Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree 1324 1,811.45 30. 54,343.65 88.85 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 151 438.88 28. 12,288.66 88.98 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 1112 740.84 28. 20,743.44 88.98 Preventative Maintenance
Durango Po 197 474.86 28. 13,296.18 89.00 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 587 440.55 28. 12,335.33 89.00 Preventative Maintenance
Bluebill L 968 882.75 28. 24,717.00 89.41 Preventative Maintenance
Stage Coac 1201 336.03 32. 10,752.80 89.45 Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane 75 818.34 28. 22,913.46 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Lane 97 473.06 28. 13,245.67 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Carl Stree 131 773.37 24. 18,560.84 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Highland C 270 128.74 28. 3,604.83 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Highland C 271 333.06 28. 9,325.62 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Highland D 275 146.55 28. 4,103.28 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Highland L 277 196.49 28. 5,501.85 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Joseph Cou 314 225.24 28. 6,306.81 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 374 452.74 30. 13,582.09 89.72 Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue 25 1,317.12 40. 52,684.61 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri 311 720.46 30. 21,613.65 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Marcia Lan 390 750.04 30. 22,501.11 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane 425 403.05 28. 11,285.26 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Teckla Cou 552 315.86 28. 8,844.06 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La 652 498.33 28. 13,953.13 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 684 481.56 28. 13,483.58 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 687 698.19 28. 19,549.19 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Pine Stree 1327 1,542.14 30. 46,264.29 89.73 Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Dri 1259 474.99 36. 17,099.61 89.74 Preventative Maintenance
Iverson Co 302 602.81 28. 16,878.72 89.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Court 543 342.44 28. 9,588.39 89.98 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 411 144.79 28. 4,054.19 89.99 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 971 339.89 24. 8,157.30 89.99 Preventative Maintenance
Oakview Co 1121 311. 28. 8,707.87 89.99 Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane 73 421.9 28. 11,813.29 90.59 Preventative Maintenance
Highland D 272 809.35 28. 22,661.89 90.59 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 383 296.77 30. 8,903.03 90.59 Preventative Maintenance
Vicky Lane 592 1,343.23 30. 40,296.91 90.59 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 626 702.05 28. 19,657.54 90.59 Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa 68 1,199.1 28. 33,574.73 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane 100 152.6 28. 4,272.73 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Connie Lan 159 661.15 30. 19,834.44 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La 651 793. 28. 22,203.95 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 686 784.84 28. 21,975.44 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 688 586.1 28. 16,410.72 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1125 607.2 28. 17,001.65 90.60 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 37
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Albert Cou 54 266.88 24. 6,405.13 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Delina Cir 189 260.25 24. 6,246.06 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan 352 453.86 24. 10,892.61 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 545 173.06 28. 4,845.82 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 548 671.81 28. 18,810.78 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan 1103 455.85 25. 11,396.33 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan 1109 350.89 24. 8,421.41 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Stella Lan 1111 309.62 24. 7,430.90 90.98 Preventative Maintenance
Hawk Ridge 261 163.2 21. 3,427.11 90.99 Preventative Maintenance
Meadowview 1124 232.79 28. 6,518.24 90.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 1137 403.09 28. 11,286.45 90.99 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Cour 287 1,871.99 24. 44,927.75 91.00 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R 1357 1,118.45 28. 31,316.52 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Saddle Clu 1358 182.11 28. 5,099.02 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R 1359 454.69 28. 12,731.23 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road 1360 376.81 28. 10,550.79 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road TBD 645.86 28. 18,084.08 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Black Berry Ct TBD 465.8 28. 13,042.40 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant R 1361 321.41 28. 8,999.53 91.14 Preventative Maintenance
Marshan Co 1203 340.42 32. 10,893.49 91.41 Preventative Maintenance
Highland D 273 662.62 28. 18,553.30 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Highland T 278 661.53 28. 18,522.77 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr 392 213.55 28. 5,979.44 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr 398 457.21 28. 12,801.92 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 624 169.43 28. 4,743.99 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Myrtle Lan 653 766.43 28. 21,459.98 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
Oak Court 660 343.72 28. 9,624.18 91.46 Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue 21 1,299.95 40. 51,998.09 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa 66 367.04 28. 10,277.11 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Appaloosa 67 438.74 28. 12,284.79 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri 312 1,251.98 30. 37,559.27 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Marvy Stre 402 612.67 28. 17,154.89 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La 650 364.66 28. 10,210.34 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Stallion L 1129 1,355.05 28. 37,941.43 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane 1130 290.8 28. 8,142.39 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D 1162 402.93 32. 12,893.67 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Carl Stree 1164 597.37 28. 16,726.26 91.47 Preventative Maintenance
Carole Dri 133 1,483.47 30. 44,503.96 91.49 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 153 214.97 28. 6,019.09 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Clearwater 154 1,235.81 28. 34,602.57 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Lacasse Dr 335 581.21 28. 16,273.90 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan 350 1,712.3 24. 41,095.17 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 547 337.45 28. 9,448.70 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 549 916.3 28. 25,656.48 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 550 615.4 28. 17,231.12 91.98 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 38
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Sherman La 1115 271.45 28. 7,600.72 91.99 Preventative Maintenance
Osprey Cou 1253 122.09 80. 9,766.96 91.99 Preventative Maintenance
4th Avenue 23 2,661.12 40. 106,444.65 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 376 1,428.15 30. 42,844.45 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 381 306.7 30. 9,200.96 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Marilyn Dr 393 327.54 28. 9,171.19 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Meadowview 404 1,461.56 30. 43,846.90 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Nottingham 659 1,319.39 30. 39,581.65 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Arlo Lane 1101 272.02 25. 6,800.45 92.32 Preventative Maintenance
Behm Lane 102 230.59 28. 6,456.55 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Jeanne Dri 310 658.79 30. 19,763.67 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Marvy Stre 401 1,936.98 28. 54,235.53 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Patti Driv 405 1,275.26 30. 38,257.68 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Palomino L 689 642.86 28. 17,999.99 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1127 854.14 28. 23,915.83 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Pinto Lane 1131 550.75 28. 15,421.01 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D 1263 425.67 32. 13,621.57 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Robinson D TBD 1,492.31 32. 47,753.92 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1320 641.64 28. 17,965.78 92.33 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 380 2,168.01 30. 65,040.30 92.34 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 77 217.24 28. 6,082.77 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 78 457.4 28. 12,807.08 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 79 535.87 28. 15,004.49 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 80 580.61 28. 16,257.00 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 81 779.52 28. 21,826.51 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T 144 759.05 28. 21,253.34 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Chippewa T 145 192.67 28. 5,394.70 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 279 152.79 68. 10,389.40 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 280 473.43 28. 13,256.05 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 281 475.65 30. 14,269.44 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 282 664.89 28. 18,616.85 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 283 806.57 30. 24,196.96 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Hokah Driv 284 868.53 30. 26,056.01 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Rice Court 445 404.08 28. 11,314.17 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk C 567 252.83 28. 7,079.32 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T 568 345.27 28. 9,667.67 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T 569 291.52 28. 8,162.63 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Tomahawk T 570 533.61 28. 14,940.97 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai 571 541.86 28. 15,172.13 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai 572 282.02 28. 7,896.63 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Totem Trai 573 325.72 28. 9,120.29 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
Arrowhead 1140 557.38 28. 15,606.66 92.55 Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu 1 783.53 24. 18,804.79 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu 3 309.75 33. 10,221.86 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
12th Avenu 4 1,197.55 24. 28,741.26 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 39
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
12th Avenu 5 337.87 24. 8,108.80 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 413 360.8 28. 10,102.36 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 414 348.85 28. 9,767.93 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 415 245.77 28. 6,881.58 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 416 259.54 28. 7,267.23 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 417 873.78 28. 24,465.86 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers C 576 327.13 28. 9,159.69 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Snow Goose 977 289.34 28. 8,101.39 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La 1116 469.89 28. 13,157.01 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Sedge Cour 1117 352.32 28. 9,865.09 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Stoneybroo 1118 367.78 28. 10,297.81 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Stoneybroo 1119 1,616.37 28. 45,258.24 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Sherman La 1138 729.57 28. 20,427.86 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Trappers X 1255 113.7 90. 10,233.04 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Broken Oak 9778 301.19 28. 8,433.34 92.99 Preventative Maintenance
Country La 163 1,528.81 30. 45,864.43 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Country La 165 811.46 30. 24,343.91 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Greenwood 256 575.02 30. 17,250.72 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Henry Lane 267 450.6 28. 12,616.93 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Highland D 276 386.47 28. 10,821.03 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Joseph Cou 315 332.7 28. 9,315.72 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 375 1,377.21 30. 41,316.31 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Praire Vie 432 578.85 30. 17,365.48 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Sherwood L 508 492.78 38. 18,725.62 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 964 333.44 28. 9,336.45 93.18 Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str 59 1,254.22 30. 37,626.46 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Bradley St 125 605.19 30. 18,155.82 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Jon Avenue 313 658.77 28. 18,445.58 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Leonard Av 362 1,715.67 28. 48,038.85 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Leonard Av 363 1,559.45 28. 43,664.69 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Pony Court 427 262.3 28. 7,344.36 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1126 951.82 28. 26,650.99 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1160 329.76 28. 9,233.18 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Clydesdale 1165 310.01 28. 8,680.34 93.19 Preventative Maintenance
Aenon Plac 53 1,112.89 30. 33,386.81 93.20 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 379 933.73 30. 28,012.04 93.20 Preventative Maintenance
Flora Cour 222 349.98 24. 8,399.43 93.98 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Cir 1104 171.74 60. 10,304.56 93.98 Preventative Maintenance
Hartford C 1106 165.2 43. 7,103.40 93.98 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 1122 982.79 28. 27,518.04 93.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 1136 451.26 28. 12,635.29 93.99 Preventative Maintenance
Henry Lane 266 1,351.33 28. 37,837.21 94.04 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 377 176.72 30. 5,301.53 94.04 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 1214 258.76 30. 7,762.77 94.04 Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str 58 699.31 30. 20,979.23 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 40
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Mustang Co 648 351.73 28. 9,848.31 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 966 3,122.8 28. 87,438.38 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Arabian Ci 1132 314.61 28. 8,808.97 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1159 439.09 28. 12,294.45 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Lilac Stre 1270 5,163.54 28. 144,579.21 94.05 Preventative Maintenance
Park Court 1199 367.61 32. 11,763.62 94.33 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 625 243.51 28. 6,818.26 94.89 Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str 56 791.84 30. 23,755.23 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Andall Str 57 904.84 30. 27,145.32 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Blackbird 120 751.55 28. 21,043.51 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Mustang La 649 479.38 28. 13,422.77 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Wood Duck 967 678.93 28. 19,010.01 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Century Tr 1128 121.45 92. 11,173.74 94.90 Preventative Maintenance
Lois Lane 378 572.66 30. 17,179.80 94.91 Preventative Maintenance
Tart Lake 544 222.79 28. 6,237.98 94.98 Preventative Maintenance
August Cir 1107 169.85 43. 7,303.37 94.98 Preventative Maintenance
Stella Cir 1108 134.57 43. 5,786.42 94.98 Preventative Maintenance
Langer Lan 1134 196.96 25. 4,924.12 94.98 Preventative Maintenance
Butternut 1354 144.75 28. 4,052.89 94.98 Preventative Maintenance
Peregrine 410 345.86 26. 8,992.36 94.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 1120 1,133.62 28. 31,741.34 94.99 Preventative Maintenance
Goldenrod 1123 258.65 28. 7,242.27 94.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pheasant H 1135 297.93 28. 8,341.94 94.99 Preventative Maintenance
Apollo Dri 64 321.09 36. 11,559.12 95.77 Preventative Maintenance
Oakwood La 1250 622.3 28. 17,424.44 95.85 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road 1144 238.99 28. 6,691.66 95.90 Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La 1346 560.17 28. 15,684.66 95.98 Preventative Maintenance
Cottonwood 1347 160.05 28. 4,481.33 95.98 Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La 1348 245.77 28. 6,881.47 95.98 Preventative Maintenance
Red Oak La 1349 190.47 28. 5,333.15 95.98 Preventative Maintenance
Old Birch 671 1,238.86 24. 29,732.66 96.00 Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre 1252 888.22 22. 19,540.80 96.98 Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre 1356 30.19 22. 664.27 96.98 Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi 454 1,657.2 24. 39,772.76 96.99 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road 1145 723.57 26. 18,812.83 97.07 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Road 1146 450.2 26. 11,705.30 97.07 Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro 1147 783.91 26. 20,381.65 97.07 Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro 1148 777.36 26. 20,211.42 97.07 Preventative Maintenance
Bubble 1151 100. 120. 12,000.00 97.07 Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre 1344 1,127.25 22. 24,799.51 97.98 Preventative Maintenance
Cedar Stre 1345 197.3 22. 4,340.70 97.98 Preventative Maintenance
Palm Stree 1350 1,175.03 28. 32,900.89 97.98 Preventative Maintenance
Deer Pass 179 523.35 28. 14,653.84 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Foxtail Co 232 804.12 30. 24,123.52 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Foxtail Dr 233 946.32 30. 28,389.56 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 41
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Foxtail Dr 234 591.78 30. 17,753.41 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Reiling Ro 444 871.78 28. 24,409.79 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi 453 551.1 24. 13,226.47 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Sargent Co 474 910.92 28. 25,505.90 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Whitetail 617 412. 30. 12,359.96 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck 627 821.24 30. 24,637.34 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck 628 588.06 30. 17,641.79 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck 629 764.33 30. 22,929.89 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Woodchuck 630 572.54 30. 17,176.19 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Partridge 691 448.75 28. 12,565.05 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Rolling Hi 982 198.3 20. 3,966.08 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Deer Pass 983 119.75 28. 3,353.04 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle 1180 1,193.72 24. 28,649.29 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle 1181 1,149.8 24. 27,595.11 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle 1182 377.72 24. 9,065.33 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle 1183 1,394.5 24. 33,468.09 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Bald Eagle 1184 643.22 24. 15,437.36 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Ash Street 1338 1,173.25 28. 32,851.13 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Ash Street 1339 888.62 28. 24,881.29 97.99 Preventative Maintenance
Vaughan Co 1167 222.87 28. 6,240.42 98.19 Preventative Maintenance
Holly Driv 976 3,463.97 24. 83,135.40 99.00 Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro 1150 305.39 26. 7,940.26 99.44 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Cove 1152 338. 26. 8,788.00 99.44 Preventative Maintenance
Fox Hollow 1153 163.53 26. 4,251.84 99.44 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 9 338.22 40. 13,528.97 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 10 331.36 40. 13,254.37 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 11 333.44 40. 13,337.58 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 12 1,457.36 40. 58,294.39 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 13 319.66 40. 12,786.35 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 14 343.35 40. 13,733.91 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 15 318.29 40. 12,731.72 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 16 483.67 40. 19,346.81 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 17 342.23 40. 13,689.35 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
2nd Avenue 18 308.67 40. 12,346.71 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Glenview A 242 494.56 27. 13,353.15 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Glenview L 247 324.6 27. 8,764.14 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Parkview D 690 501.41 27. 13,538.14 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Glenview L 984 824.14 27. 22,251.78 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Aqua Lane 1006 650. 24. 15,600.00 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1030 455.49 28. 12,753.62 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Elm Street 1031 411.23 28. 11,514.37 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Red Fox Ro 1149 196.09 26. 5,098.27 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre 1204 832.37 32. 26,635.68 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre 1205 952.53 32. 30,480.99 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Shelia Ave 1206 483.84 32. 15,482.88 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 42
Street Name Section ID Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (ft²) PCI Recommended Maintenance Activity
Timothy Co 1207 201.99 32. 6,463.69 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre 1208 380.12 32. 12,163.84 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Wayne Cour 1209 201.33 32. 6,442.55 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre 1210 620.81 32. 19,865.94 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Kelly Stre 1212 891.1 32. 28,515.28 99.57 Preventative Maintenance
Butternut St TBD 513.45 28. 14,376.60 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
Redwood Ct TBD 344.61 28. 9,649.08 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
Cypress St TBD 2,488.42 28. 69,675.76 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
Rosewood St TBD 1,459.37 28. 40,862.36 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
Rosewood St TBD 1,388.84 28. 38,887.52 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu TBD 471.8 28. 13,210.40 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu TBD 284.42 28. 7963.76 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu 1352 488.71 28. 13,683.94 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
21st Avenu 1355 238.36 28. 6,673.95 99.98 Preventative Maintenance
Pavement Management Report
Page | 43
Table B.2. List of private roadways not inspected.
Name Section ID Length
82nd St E 1281 914.91
Apollo Ct 1288 1054.37
Apollo Dr 1272 1399.03
Apple Ln 1278 872.36
Aqua Cir 1310 263.75
Baldwin Cr 1279 499.07
Baldwin Cr 1280 196.48
Baldwin Cr 1314 172.64
Baldwin Cr 1315 497.64
Baldwin Cr 1316 171.18
Cherry Ln 1313 642.3
Ivy Ridge Ct 1311 332.41
Ivy Ridge Ct 1312 513.85
Ivy Ridge Ct 1317 188.48
Ivy Ridge Ct 1318 1,532.75
Market Pl 399 241.22
Market Pl 1286 1511.24
Market Pl 1287 794.29
Market Pl 1319 643.49
Morgan Ln 1283 557.86
Morgan Ln 1285 477.05
Nancy Ct 1305 579.09
Otter Lake 1273 1494.06
Plum Ln 1276 925.15
Shetland Ln 1284 461.08
Willow Pond Trl 1271 1,101.64
Willow Pond Trl 1300 304.84
Willow Pond Trl 1301 272.95
Willow Pond Trl 1302 217.39
Willow Pond Trl 1303 315.45
Willow Pond Trl 1304 228.02
Pavement Management Report
Page | 44
Table B.3. List of gravel roadways not inspected.
Name Section ID Length
74th Street 1188 627.95
74th Street 1189 366.98
74th Street 1257 250.94
Cedar Street E 1251 1,302.11
Cedar Street E 1252 888.22
Channel Dr 1277 393.48
Elmcrest Avenue 1185 243.42
Elmcrest Avenue 1186 621.95
Elmcrest Avenue 1330 5,574.6
Elmcrest Avenue 1331 2,602.23
Elmcrest Avenue 1233b 3,553.62
Pine Street 1321 1,629.99
Pine Street 1322 2,997.9
%&d(%&c(
County Hwy 10
County Hwy 14
County Hwy 21
County Hwy 23
County Hwy 14
Hodgson Rd
C o u nty H w y 2 3
County Hwy 21
Mill & Overlay Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
0 4,250Feet¯Figure 2 - Mill and Overlay
Document Path: K:\02029-230\GIS\Maps\MillOverlay2018Updated.mxd Date Saved: 2/1/2018 2:39:59 PM
1 inch = 4,250 f eet
Lino Lakes PMP Lino Lakes, MN
Engineering Planning Environmental Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Minneapolis St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
February 8, 2018
City of Lino Lakes
Mr. Michael Grochala
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Re: Engineering Proposal for the 2018 Mill and Overlay Project
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The City of Lino Lakes has a Pavement Management Plan which recommends preservation of
local roadways based on their OCI ratings. The proposed 2018 Mill and Overlay Project
(roadway preservation) includes:
Mill and Overlay
· Ware Road (6365 LF) Total Estimated Cost - $415,000
- Project scope to include minor curb and gutter replacement and
storm sewer repair
· Brandywood Estates (4610 LF) Total Estimated Cost - $300,000
- Whitetail Trail, White Oak Road, Buckthorn Lane,
Chokecherry Road, Velvetleaf lane
- Project scope to include minor curb and gutter replacement and
storm sewer repair
Based on the City’s existing street maintenance plan and discussions with staff, WSB would
perform the following tasks:
I. Prepare Final Project Plans/Maps
Final construction plans will be prepared for the milling and overlaying of the
above listed roadways. Topographic information will be collected by a
combination of field survey, city parcel map information and Lidar contours.
Construction plans necessary for the contractor to build the roadway to
specifications will be prepared.
RCWD, Ramsey County and Anoka County permits will be obtained for the
project.
Mr. Michael Grochala
February 8, 2018
Page 2
II. Final Quantities
An Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost will be completed on the final
construction plans and specifications.
III. Prepare Permits, Specifications and Bidding Documents
WSB will work with impacted property owners through the project design. WSB
will prepare permit applications and submit to the appropriate regulatory
agencies.
WSB will develop the final project plans/maps and specifications based on the
agency review comments. This task will include an internal QA/QC review of the
final plans, quantities, and specifications.
Upon completion of permitting, and agency review and approval, a final set of
construction documents will be prepared for bidding.
WSB will print, assemble, and submit the final contract documents to the City and
request authorization to advertise the project for bidding. WSB will receive and
respond to bidder inquiries concerning the plans, specifications, and intent of the
project. Logs of all inquiries will be kept and maintained to document inquiries.
WSB will attend the project bid opening with the City.
WSB will review the low bidder’s bid proposal, contractor’s and subcontractor’s
personnel proposed for the project and relative experience, quality and availability
of equipment and performance on similar projects.
The engineering fee to complete the 2018 Mill and Overlay Project is $43,978.00 (not to
exceed).
This letter represents our complete understanding of the 2018 Mill and Overlay Project and the
proposed scope of services. If you are in agreement with the scope of services and proposed fee,
please sign in the appropriate space below and return one copy to us.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to call me at 763-287-7167.
Mr. Michael Grochala
February 8, 2018
Page 3
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Edward C. Youngquist
Project Manager
ACCEPTANCE:
The City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $43,978.00 for all services outlined
in this letter.
City of Lino Lakes
Name
Title
Date
2018 Road Improvement Project
Mill and Overlay-Ware Rd / Brandywood Estates
City of Lino Lakes
Anoka County
Base Estimated Hours
Engineering Graduate
Associate / Project Project Specialist Engineer 2-Person Office Total
Principal RLS Manager Engineer V IV Survey Crew Technician Hours Cost
Task Description
1
A. Kickoff meeting 2 2 2 6 726.00$
B. Assess existing conditions 4 8 8 20 2,332.00$
C. Assess culverts/drainage -$
D. Propose best value solution for pavement & C&G -$
E. Propose best value solution for storm sewer -$
F. Determine potential areas and types of water quality imp.-$
G. Determine if other rehab necessary -$
H. Review televising tapes -$
I. Review soil borings discuss pavement solutions 2 2 4 378.00$
J. Collect background data and private utility info 4 8 12 1,384.00$
K. Prepare preliminary opinion of probable cost 8 8 16 1,512.00$
L. Create funding/assessment roll -$
M. Maps/graphics for meetings/report -$
N. Neigborhood meeting (#1)-$
O. Preliminary (feasibility) Report Preparation -$
Subtotal 6 24 18 10 58 6,332.00$
2
A. Topographic Survey (estimate by others)20 20 3,440.00$
Subtotal 20 20 3,440.00$
3
A. Final Plans
1. Existing Conditions Plan/Topo Base Map 4 32 36 4,408.00$
2. Removals/Demolition Plan -$
3. Traffic Control/Detour Plan 6 10 16 1,824.00$
4. Street Mill/Overlay Plans 10 76 86 10,516.00$
5. Storm Sewer Repair 4 14 18 2,140.00$
6. Sealcoat Plans -$
7. Water Quality Improvement Plan (Infiltration Area)-$
8. Stormwater Modeling (HydroCad)-$
9. Utility Details Plan (Sanitary/Storm)-$
10 Construction Specifications 8 16 12 36 3,916.00$
11 Misc. Sheets (Title/Details/etc)10 10 1,260.00$
B. SWPPP Plan -$
1. Prepare Plan -$
2. Prepare report -$
C. Meetings -$
1. Plan and specification meeting with City (#2)6 6 12 1,422.00$
2. Neighborhood meeting (#2)-$
D. Bidding Administration -$
1. Website creation and maitenance 2 2 2 6 630.00$
2. Advertise bids 2 4 4 10 1,210.00$
3. Create/Distribute Bid Package 2 4 6 736.00$
4. Respond to RFIs from prospective bidders 4 4 8 880.00$
5. Issue addenda, if req'd 4 2 4 10 1,114.00$
6. Bid Opening/Tabulate results 2 4 6 736.00$
7. Letter of Award recommendation to City 2 2 4 462.00$
8 Prepare Notice of Award and Contract 2 2 2 6 748.00$
Subtotal 10 60 148 20 32 270 32,002.00$
8 *All Special Services are categorized as pass through items
A. Permits
1. Anoka County 2 4 6 692.00$
2. Ramsey County 2 4 6 692.00$
B. Soil Borings & Coordination 2 2 4 8 820.00$
C.Materials Testing & Coordination -$
Subtotal 6 10 4 20 2,204.00$
Total Hours 16 90 176 34 20 32 368 43,978.00$
Hourly Costs 160.00 152.00 143.00 94.00 126.00 95.00 172.00 137.00
Total Direct Labor Costs $2,288.00 $8,460.00 $22,176.00 $3,230.00 $3,440.00 $4,384.00
TOTAL BASE PROJECT COST 43,978.00$
Budgeted Hours
Special Services*
Preliminary Design
Preliminary Survey
Design
%&d(%&c(
County Hwy 10
County Hwy 14
County Hwy 21
County Hwy 23
County Hwy 14
Hodgson Rd
C o u nty H w y 2 3
County Hwy 21
Reclaim Year
2018
2021
0 4,250Feet¯Figure 1 - Full Depth Reclaim/Reconstruction
Document Path: K:\02029-230\GIS\Maps\Reclaim2018.mxd Date Saved: 1/8/2018 11:45:27 AM
1 inch = 4,250 f eet
Lino Lakes PMP Lino Lakes, MN
Centerville Lake
Peltier Lake
Reshanau Lake
Rice Lake
Marshan Lake
George Watch Lake
Baldwin Lake
Amelia Lake
Otter Lake
Cedar Lake
Wards Lake
Sherman Lake
CENTERVILLE
%&d(
%&c(
%&c(
GnWX
GwWX
GÀWX
Brandywood Estates
Ware Road
Parkway Rd
Elm St
77th St W
Otter Lake Rd
Killdeer Dr
Stagecoach Tr
Highland Dr
Lake DrPony Ct
Go
rdon Ave
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
D
rF
a
w
n
L
a
A p oll o D r
S
h
e
r
m
a
n
L
a
k
e
R
d
Lamotte Dr
Laurene Ave
O
a
k
C
t
F l o r a C tWhitetail Tr
12th Ave S
Gray Heron Dr
Kelly St
Park Ct
62nd St
F o x R d
Ware Rd
Egret La
79th StHenery La
Black Duck Dr
Karth RdChippewa T r
Marilyn Dr
Bloom Ct
Trappers Cro
Lacasse Dr
Lantern La
Sunris
e Ave
Ceda r St E
Baldwin Lake Rd
Lois La
Ma rvy St
H aw tho r n R d
82nd St E
Foxtail Dr
C e n t u r y T r
H
o
k
a
h
D
r
Sioux La
Jon Ave
W
o
o
d
D
u
c
k
T
r
P
alo
m
in
o L
a
Langer La
Jea
nn
e Dr
Pattie Dr
T o w n C e n t e r P k w y
G St
Molitor Dr
S G l e n T r R e i l i n g R d
21st Ave N
D
e
e
r
w
o
o
d
L
a
Bluebill La
64th St
Pheasant Hills Dr
Orange St
Lilac St
Aenon Pl
Pheasant Run S
Bald Eagle Blvd W
8 1 s t S t W
Otter Lake Dr
Lin den La
Lakeview Dr
T h o m a s S t
Centerville Rd
Vicki La
Birch St
W
oodridge La
Maple La
Carole Dr
Partridge Pl
Country La
ISTH 35E
Hodgson Rd
W Shadow Lake Dr
Ivy Ridge La
Leonard Ave
Elmcrest Ave N
81st St E
22nd Ave S
H o ll y C t
I S T H 3 5 W
W o odlan d Dr
Joy
er La
Andall St
C a r l S t
140th St N
D
i
a
n
e
S
t
Rehbeins St77th St E
Oak La
Old Birch St
R o b i n s o n D r
Evergreen Tr
H St
J a m e s S t
Freeway Dr
20th Ave S
20th Ave N
Pelt
ier L
ake Dr
4th Ave
Rondeau Rd W
F St
Main St
Ash St
Rondeau Lake Rd E
80th St E
A q u a L a
Holly Dr
Document Path: K:\02988-360\GIS\Maps\2018RoadImprovementMap.mxd
Ü
0 3,500Feet
Site Location Map2018 Road Improvement ProjectLino Lakes, MN
2018 Road Improvements
Lino Lakes Boundary