HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-01-2018 Council Work Session PacketCITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday, October 1, 2018
Community Room
6:00 P.M.
1. Watermark, Michael Grochala
a. First Addition Final Plat, Katie Larsen
b. Master Development Agreement, Jay Squires and Mike Grochala To Follow
c. Plans & Specs for NE Peltier Drainage Outlet, Diane Hankee and Mike Grochala
To Follow
2. Residents Request for 12th Avenue Trail, Rick DeGardner
2a. Kids Cooking School, Tiffany Cavegn
3. 49 & J Trunk Utility Improvements – Easement Acquisition, Michael Grochala
4. Lake & Market Place Drive – Land Acquisition, Michael Grochala
5. Comprehensive Plan Update, Michael Grochala
6. Anoka County Regional Economic Development MOU, Michael Grochala
7. Arena Acres Park Update, Rick DeGardner
8. West Shadow Lake Drive Rezoning, Katie Larsen
9. City Council Compensation, Jeff Karlson
10. Council Updates on Boards/Commissions, City Council
11. Monthly Progress Report, Jeff Karlson
12. Review Regular Agenda
13. Adjourn
WS – Item 1
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 1
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: Watermark
Background
Watermark is a master planned residential community located in the northwest quadrant
of I-35E and CSAH 14/Main Street. The development is 372 gross acres and consists of
a residential mix of 706 single family lots and 165 townhome units totaling 864 housing
units. On June 13, 2016, the City Council approved the PUD Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat with Resolution No. 16-51. On September 10, 2018, Lennar
submitted a Land Use Application for Watermark 1st Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat.
At the Work Session, staff will review with Council the following items:
1. Watermark First Addition Final Plat, Katie Larsen
The 1st Addition proposes 93 townhome units and 100 single family lots for a total of 193
housing units.
2. Master Development Agreement, Jay Squires
3. Plans & Specs for NE Peltier Drainage Outlet, Diane Hankee and Mike Grochala
The tentative schedule for the 1st Addition is October 10th Planning & Zoning Board
recommendation and October 22nd City Council approval.
Attachments
1. Watermark 1st Addition Final Plat
2. Draft Master Development Agreement (To Follow)
3. WSB Proposal for Plans and Specifications (To Follow)
Requested Council Direction
None. Discussion Only.
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING
WATERMARK
INSET 'A'
See Detail
Detail
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
.
(C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
INSET 'B'
WATERMARK
HA
R
R
I
E
T
L
A
N
E
GE
N
E
V
A
DI
A
M
O
N
D
LA
N
E
CR
A
N
E
DR
I
V
E
CO
U
R
T
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING
INSET 'C'
WATERMARK
HA
R
R
I
E
T
WAT
E
R
M
A
R
K
WA
Y
LANE
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING
INSET 'D'
WATERMARK
ENVIRONMENTAL ◦ ENGINEERING ◦ SURVEYING
INSET 'E'
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
.
(C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
WATERMARK
B
A
L
S
A
M
W
A
Y
B
A
L
S
A
M
W
A
Y
21ST
A
V
E
N
U
E
NO
R
T
H
CR
A
N
E
DR
I
V
E
WAT
E
R
M
A
R
K
WAY
BAL
S
A
M
W
A
Y
WS – Item 2
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 2
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
Re: Residents Request for 12th Avenue Trail
Background
Mrs. Ashley Swenson and some area residents addressed the Park Board last month
regarding accessibility issues for residents in the Trappers Crossing development. The
primary concern expressed was the lack of the pedestrian trail connection along 12th
Avenue. This creates an unsafe situation and hinders pedestrian access to Brandywood
Park.
Completion of the 12th Avenue trail is identified within the Comprehensive Parks and
Trails System Capital Improvement Plan. The Park Board considered this particular
project while developing their 2018 Parks and Trails Capital Projects recommendation,
but was not included in their final recommendation presented to the City Council at the
May 7, 2018 work session.
Mrs. Swenson has requested the opportunity to address the City Council regarding the
12th Avenue Trail.
Attachments
Parks and Trails Map – Trappers Crossing Area
Ashley Swenson Letter
Parks & Trails - Trappers Crossing Area
Ashley Swenson
1186 Durango Point
Lino Lakes, MN 55038
September 25, 2018
To Whom it May Concern:
We recently moved into the area and we love Lino Lakes! This is a wonderful area with so much
to offer including so many wonderful parks and trails. We live in Trapper’s Crossing off of Holly. There
are 2 parks near our house-Birch and Brandywood Park- but as a family, we cannot visit either safely
without a car because my young son is in a wheelchair. Birch Park has 25 stairs making it completely
inaccessible. The path to Brandywood Park is incomplete for .1 mile- a very short, but dangerous section
of road. In this section, the path ends abruptly and spits out onto 12th Avenue where there is little to no
shoulder. When our family rides their bikes, our young children have to ride on the road. Cars zip by
very fast and it is very dangerous. The speed limit on that road is 45 mph.
I have spoken with several other neighbors that share this same concern for safety on that
section of incomplete path on 12th Ave. Many residents walk their dogs, ride bikes, run or go on family
walks in our neighborhood. The shoulder on 12th Ave is very narrow and the speed limit is so fast. So
many residents and families use this trail. If that .1 mile section is completed, that path links with the
Rice Creek Chain of which would make that whole Rice Creek Reserve accessible to our neighborhood as
well as surrounding neighborhoods.
Bonnie Moore, a resident in Trapper’s Crossing of 19 years, said “I walk my dogs nearly every
day along 12th Avenue and have had to stand in the ditch to allow cars to pass that don’t wait for
oncoming cars to pass. There are always a few who think it’s funny to come right at me and veer off at
the end. This is not possible to maneuver if I had a stroller or bicycle or kiddos with me… If I’m walking
against traffic then it is difficult to see cars that are turning into the lane because the ditch is deep and
the weeds are tall. Drivers are not looking for pedestrians to be around the corner. Continuous
accessible paths for the many pedestrians is imperative for our development before an accident or
worse happens.”
Heather Hoecke said “12th Avenue has always been a dangerous place for kids to ride their bikes
from Peregrine Circle to White Oak Road. The path is incomplete between the two roads. Cars
continually speed down 12th Avenue, which has a 45 mph speed limit to start with, especially young
drivers. Cars drag race. Drivers are distracted while driving. And our children are expected to share the
road with these drivers. Our children should be given a safe alternative in the form of a completed bike
path along 12th Avenue.”
Liz and Mike Kaufenburg said “My husband and I moved to Lino Lakes 4 years ago. One of the
things that drew us here is the extensive parks and trails network. We frequently bike, walk, and run
through the neighborhoods of Trapper’s Crossing, 12th Avenue and Birch Park. We have never felt as
comfortable along 12th Ave along the section with no path. And since having our daughter, 18 months
ago, I won’t use 12th Avenue during rush hour due to how dangerous it is with the lack of trail and traffic.
This is especially difficult as we work full time so our opportunity to get outside is somewhat limited. In
addition, we have greatly enjoyed Birch Park, but find it difficult to use with a stroller due to the steps.”
On any given summer night, particularly on the weekends, there will be a couple dozen people
that traverse the road on 12th Ave. which often results in dangerous interactions between cars, joggers,
children, and bikers. The neighborhoods in this area are completely disconnected and the walkability is
greatly limited.
As residents in this area of Lino Lakes, we would love to see the path completed on 12th Avenue
because it would not only open up Brandywood Park, but the entire Rice Creek Chain of Lakes to bikes,
strollers, runners, wheelchairs, couples and families that want to SAFELY use the trails to run or walk
their dogs.
Thank you,
Ashley Swenson
1. Here is a picture of where the path on
12th avenue abruptly ends.
2. This is where the path ends and spits out onto
the road on 12th Avenue with very little
shoulder. Definitely not wide enough for a
wheelchair or bike trailer and not safe for
children to ride, even closely supervised.
The trail is only discontinued for .1 mile.
3. Here is where the trail continues across the street on
the north side of the road. There is no trail on the south side of the
road for .1 mile. Only that tiny shoulder. To get to Brandywood Park
you would turn right here on White Oak Drive and continue on the
neighborhood streets to the park. This path that you see on the
north side continues and connects with the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes
by crossing Birch Street.
4. For reference, here is a picture of the beginning of
the trail from the Trappers Crossing Neighborhood
to Birch Park. It is a beautiful trail, but completely
inaccessible to wheelchairs, bikes or strollers with
25 steps.
Thank you so much for your consideration. Please let
me know if there is anything we can do to help make these
parks and trails more accessible and safe.
ashley.swenson@gmail.com 801-971-9670
WS – Item 3
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 3
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: 49 & J Trunk Utility Improvements – Easement Acquisition
Background
The City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications to for the CRJ/CSAH 49
Trunk Utility Improvements in March of 2018. The purpose of the improvement is to provide
sanitary sewer and water main to services to approximately 60 acres of property surrounding the
J and 49 intersection. The project also includes reversing existing sewer flow for 12 Lino Lakes
properties that are currently serviced by Shoreview.
WSB is nearing completion of the plan preparation and has identified potential areas where
easement acquisition would be required to facilitate the improvements. There are three
properties that will be potentially affected by the improvements. These include two single
family properties located east of Woodridge Lane and a portion of the 49 Club property.
Staff has had some initial discussion with the property owners to provide information about the
project and discuss the easement acquisition process. We have reached a point in the design
process where property acquisition could have an impact on the design process. We are also
aware that one of the properties will be listed for sale in the next week. As a result staff is
seeking some additional guidance from the City Council.
Parcel #1, 255 Ash Street
Sanitary sewer force main and trunk water main are proposed to be extended across the rear of
this property. A 20’wide easement will required across the rear of this property. The owner is
has been willing to work with the City but is in the process of selling the property at this time.
• Staff is requesting council authorization to acquire the easement prior to the property
selling and a new owner entering the discussion. If desired, WSB will complete the
Minimum Damage Acquisition Report for City Council approval.
• Staff is also requesting consideration by the Council to purchase the property in its
entirety. This would provide redevelopment options and include the ability to put the
property back on the market after our improvement project is completed. If desired, WSB
will complete an acquisition appraisal for the property.
Parcel #2, 275 Ash Street
Sanitary sewer force main and trunk water main are proposed to be extended across the rear of
this property. A 20’wide easement will required. An additional easement may be needed across
the front of the property to facilitate the sewer reversal.
Due to the additional easement acquisition, staff has discussed, with the property owner, the
possibility of acquiring the entire property. This would allow for some design changes that
would minimize easement acquisition to the east. This may also allow for different street and
access routing in conjunction with future redevelopment. The owner, while interested in staying
on the property, is willing to discuss the options.
• Staff is proposing preparation of an acquisition report for review by the City Council and
property owner to evaluate possible acquisition of the property. If the property is
purchased the City would have the option of retaining for future redevelopment or
placing it back on the market with the required easements in place.
Funding for acquisition would be from the Trunk Area and Unit fund.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting council direction regarding acquisition of properties as noted.
Attachments
1. Trunk Utility service area
2. Parcel Map.
Shoreview Sanitary Sewer Connection
Approximate Lift Station Service Area
Site Location Map
Legend
Address Labels
Sewer Gravity Mains
Water Mains March 21, 2018
Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates
1 in = 400 ft
±
WS – Item 4
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 4
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: 77th Street Realignment – 7685 Lake Drive Parcel
Background
In 2002, in conjunction with the construction of the MarketPlace development (Target/Kohl’s), a
new signalized intersection was created at Marketplace Drive and Lake Drive. At the same time
the existing 77th Street/Lake Drive intersection was converted to a right-in, right-out only
intersection. In consideration of the access closure the City envisioned the potential future
realignment of 77th Street, west of Lake Drive, with the new Market Place intersection.
In 2007, as part of a potential redevelopment plan for City owned property, a feasibility study
was completed for realigning 77th. The realignment was intended to restore full access to Lake
Drive for properties northwest of the 77th/Lake intersection. Additionally, the project would aid
in development of City owned properties north of 77th Street and properties to the south.
The study identified the properties that would need to be obtained to complete the improvements.
One of the properties is a single family home immediately adjacent to the intersection. Staff has
recently been contacted by the owner of the property inquiring as to the City’s interest in the
property.
As mentioned, the extension of 77th is both a transportation improvement as well as a potential
economic development catalyst. Staff is proposing acquisition of the property at this time to
obtain control of the property. This would eliminate one major impediment to redevelop and/or
transportation improvements in the future.
The house would likely be demolished. The acquisition would be eligible for municipal state aid
funding. Use of the proceeds from the property sale to the American Legion could also be
considered for this purpose.
If the council would like to proceed staff recommends preparation of an appraisal for the
property. The owner has not provided an asking price at this time. The current county market
value is $131,000. Total taxes payable in 2018 are $1,324.00.
EDAC Recommendation
EDAC recommended pursuing acquisition of the property at its September 6 meeting.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting council direction to pursue acquisition of the property located at 7685 Lake
Drive.
Attachments
1. General Location Map
2. 77th Street Realignment Concept
3. Redevelopment Concept including city property.
General Location Map
Legend
Address Labels
September 26, 2018
Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates
1 in = 376 ft
±
WS – Item 5
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 5
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: Comprehensive Plan Update
Background
The draft Comprehensive Plan was completed in March of 2018. The City Council expressed
some concern about the Mixed Use land classification and had questions regarding residential
densities. Staff was asked to provide additional information and alternatives to eliminate the
Mixed Use category.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2011, included areas guided as “Mixed Use”. Mixed
Use is defined in the plan as:
“Mix of residential, retail, and office uses either within one building, structure or
development. Residential development may include higher density housing options.” Page 3-8.
The Mixed Use areas vary in allowable density but are predominately guided at 8-15 units per
acre. The exceptions are the Legacy at Woods Edge development (10-24 units per acre) and the
Watermark Area (up to 4.5 units per acre).
As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the P&Z and the council recommended that two
new Mixed Use areas be added to the nine existing areas:
1. The Winter Property; and
2. 80th Street (west of I-35E and south of Hardwood Creek)
As a result the draft plan now includes 12 Mixed Use areas.
City Council concerns included 1) the density range allowed in Mixed Use Districts and whether
it was appropriate in all areas; 2) uncertainty of the development parameters/outcomes for each
site; and 3) use of the PUD process for all Mixed Use areas.
The existing Mixed Use districts serve a number of purposes, both locally and regionally.
Locally, the Mixed Use districts were intended to create and strengthen the appearance of the
city’s gateways, provide higher density residential areas to promote affordable and life cycle
housing goals and provide opportunities for neighborhood based goods and services. The
emphasis is on design of compact walkable development, high architectural standards. subject to
a City approved master plan, at key intersections in the City. The use of the Planned Unit
Development process was intended to drive collaboration between the City and Developer and
give the City more control over the development outcome.
Proposed Changes
To address concerns raised by City Council and better differentiate the the differenct
development areas. staff is recommending a number of proposed changes. They include:
1. Eliminate the four acre Mixed Use area at Lake and Vicky (area D). This area is
proposed to be reclassified as Medium Density Residential.
2. Establish a new Low Density Mixed Residential District (3.0 to 4.5 units per acre).
a. Low Density Mixed Residential provides for residential development between 3.0
and 4.5 units per acre. The category would allow inclusion of both attached and
detached housing types including single family detached, two-family homes,
townhomes and detached townhomes. Pedestrian and open space connections
should be provided to achieve a relationship with the larger community.
b. Reclassify the Watermark Development (area I) as Low Density Mixed
Residential.
3. Establish a new Planned Residential/Commercial District (8-10 units per acre).
a. Planned Residential/Commercial provides a setting for high density development
to accommodate affordable and life cycle housing choices with opportunities for
neighborhood scale retail, service and office uses. Located in areas along high
traffic corridors the district provides a transition to lower density residential uses.
b. Residential development is the primary emphasis with requirements comparable
to the City’s R-4, Multi-family residential zoning district. Housing types in this
district would include townhomes, condominiums and potentially apartment
developments in an attached or stacked configuration. Emphasis on high quality
architecture with building heights of 2 to 3 stories maximum.
c. Compatible commercial uses allowed by Conditional Use Permit consistent with
the NB, Neighborhood Business and LB, Limited Business Districts.
d. Reclassify and include the following Mixed Use districts:
i. Robinson Farm/Main Street
ii. Lake Drive/77th (already developed – may need special consideration)
iii. Waldoch Farms
iv. Centerville Road/Birch Street
v. 80th Street West of I-35E
vi. Lake Drive and 77th – Gracewood Assisted Living
4. Establish a new Signature Gateway District (8-10 units per acre; 10 -24 in the Town
Center)
a. The Signature Gateway District is reserved for high visibility, high traffic
corridors serving as an entrance to the Community. The district allows for
development of multiple complementary uses on a single site including a
combination of higher density residential, commercial services, and employment
opportunities.
b. Residential densities of 8-10 units an acre provide for both affordable and life
cycle housing opportunities. District would include ability for the Council to
approve up to 15 units/acre. The Legacy at Woods Edge (Town Center) area
allows for 10-24 units per acre consistent with the existing approved PUD.
c. Development requires City approval of a master plan. Master plans have been
approved for both the Town Center and 49/J areas.
d. Strong emphasis on high quality architecture and design standards.
e. Development will include City signature elements including decorative lighting
and entrance signage.
f. Reclassify the following Mixed Use districts:
i. CR J & CR 49 (Item A)
ii. Lake Drive/ Main Street (Item C
iii. Town Center/Legacy (Item F)
iv. Centerville Road/CR J (Item J on table 3-4)
5. Establish an Office/Medium Density Residential District (4 to 6 units per acre).
a. Provides for office and business uses and residential units at a density of 4 to 6
units per acre. Residential development is not required but should not exceed
50% of the land area.
b. Residential development should incorporate open space preservation, and expand
trail linkages.
c. Office uses include administrative, professional or clerical services including
medical clinics. Limited retail or services may be included.
d. Reclassify Winter Property from Mixed Use.
With the proposed district changes staff is also recommending the following modifications to
residential density ranges:
Land Use Category 2030 Plan
Units Per Acre
Proposed 2040
Units Per Acre
Low Density Residential 1.6 to 3.9 1.6 to 3.0
Low Density Mixed Residential N/A 3.0 to 4.5
Medium Density Residential 4.0 to 5.9 4.0 to 6.0
High Density Residential 6.0 to 10 6.0 to 8.0
Planned Residential/Commercial N/A 8.0 to 10
Signature Gateway N/A 8.0 to 10; max 15
10-24 Town Center
Mixed Use 8-15; 10-24 N/A
Office- Medium Density Residential N/A 4.0 to 6.0
The proposed changes reflect and initial outline of changes. Goals and policies for each
individual district may be modified through discussion with Planning & Zoning Board, City
Council and receipt of public comment.
Planned Unit Developments
Staff is also proposing to modify the Implementation Chapter to propose additional guidance for
the use of Planned Unit Developments. This will include:
• provisions for future ordinance amendments that better define applicability of PUD’s
• minimum thresholds for residential PUD’s
• identification of allowed flexibilities.
Planning and Zoning Board Review
The Planning and Zoning Board discussed the proposed changes at their September 12, 2018
regular meeting. They had a number of comments and requested further discussion. Key
discussion points included:
• Generally supportive of density and establishment of proposed districts.
• Require a minimum percentage of commercial in Planned Residential/Commerical areas
• Maintain flexibility in PUD’s
• Create a separate Town Center District for Legacy at Woods Edge.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting comment on the proposed changes.
Attachments
1. Proposed Mixed Use Changes
3-5
Figure 3-1� Full Build Land Use
Baldw in Lak e
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilk inson
Lake
Ot ter Lake
Amel ia
Lake
Reshanau Lak eRice Lake
Centervil le
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lak e
Li l a c S t
20
th Ave
S
456721
456749
456754
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456721
456721
456714456714
20th Ave
20th Ave
§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")153
")140
")84
")84
M ai n S t
Main St
M ai n St
Cedar St
Hodgson
Rd
Lake Dr
Elm S t
Birc h St
Birch St
Lake Dr
Sunset Ave
Rondeau
Lake Dr E
As h St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr
62nd St N
Ash St
Rondeau
Lake Rd W
Ce
nte
rvi
ll
e
Rd
Holly
Dr
4th Ave
Holly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th St
City of Blaine
City of Col umbus
City of Hugo
City of North Oaks White Bear Township ´
Fig ure 3-1
Full B uild Out Land Use
Lege nd
City of Centerville
Permanent Rural
Low Density Residential
Medium De nsi ty Residential
Hig h Den sity Reside ntial
Mixed Use
Commercia l
Business Campus
Industria l
Civic and Institutional
Parks and O pen Space
Private Airfield
Open Water
Rig ht-of-Way
Mu nicipal Bou ndary
Parcels
Stre ams
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/8/2018
DRAFT Mar13-18
for review only
WS – Item 6
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 6
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Re: Anoka County Regional Economic Development Initiative
Background
In December of 2017 Anoka County, in partnership with Connexus Energy and the North
Metro Chamber of Commerce, completed the “Economic Development Business
Recruitment Roadmap”. The study was prepared by Ady Advantage, a national
economic development and site selection consultant. The study included a broad range of
research and survey information across Anoka County leading to compilation of a county
wide action plan.
In July of this year the City Council concurred with EDAC’s recommendation for the
City to partner in the Anoka County Regional Economic Development Imitative. As part
of the ongoing process development the group has drafted a Memorandum Of
Understanding (MOU) to establish the organizational structure, goals, reporting and
financial considerations.
Funding for ongoing activities will be decided by a separate agreement based on a
proposed annual budget. Services will include website, MnCAR access, broker events
and other marketing activities approved by the Executive Committee. A voluntary cost
sharing agreement will be distributed for approval by each community. The City’s initial
contribution for 2018 was $1,134.
EDAC reviewed the proposed MOU at its September 6 meeting was provided comments
and recommended the City’s participation.
Anoka County will be hosting a Local Government Officials meeting at the end of
October 30th with a presentation and review of the proposed 2019 activities.
Requested Council Direction
Discussion Only. Staff is anticipating City Council consideration of the MOU at the
October 24, 2019 regular meeting.
Attachments
1. Draft Memorandum of Understanding
2. Proposed Activity Options
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR ANOKA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
By and Among
THE COUNTY OF ANOKA, CONNEXUS ENERGY, METRONORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,
AND PARTICIPATING MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN ANOKA COUNTY
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is by, between, and among the County of Anoka, a
political subdivision of the state of Minnesota, (hereinafter “the County”); Connexus Energy, a
Minnesota corporation in Ramsey, Minnesota; MetroNorth Chamber of Commerce, a Minnesota
nonprofit organization; and participating Municipalities located within Anoka County, Minnesota
(See Exhibit A). For purposes of this MOU, the aforementioned are referred to collectively as the
“Hosting Agencies” for the Anoka County economic development initiative.
WHEREAS, a research study was completed by a Consultant, Ady Advantage, in December 2017
(“the Study”) for a market research analysis and evaluation of business opportunities, targets, and
strategies for economic development within Anoka County; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the Study, the Hosting Agencies plan to gather with one another as well as
other community partners to develop a vision, create an action plan, and set realistic goals to
implement shared objectives for economic development and business recruitment within Anoka
County; and
WHEREAS, the Hosting Agencies wish to enter into this MOU to establish organizational structures
and to develop specific goals and objectives for the collaboration;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
A. Purpose. The purpose of this MOU is to set a framework for the Hosting Agencies and other
participating entities, to further the goals of the economic development collaboration by:
(a) outlining general objectives, (b) defining mutual responsibilities, and (c) setting goals,
timelines, communication, and other details necessary to achieve the desired outcomes.
B. Term. This Memorandum of Understanding is effective upon execution and will continue in
effect for five (5) years, or until completion and implementation of a Final Action Plan, as
determined by the Executive Committee. The term of this MOU may be renewed for
subsequent five (5) year terms upon written agreement of the parties.
C. Executive Committee. For purposes of this MOU, the Executive Committee for the Anoka
County economic development initiative is comprised of representatives from Anoka
County, Connexus Energy, Metro North Chamber, and up to four participating cities (“City
members”). City members of the Executive Committee shall have staggered, rotating terms
as addressed below. A Chairperson may be selected by the members of the Executive
Committee to set and conduct meetings and be the primary point of contact between the
Executive Committee and any subcommittees.
2
The names and contact information for the initial Executive Committee members are listed
in the attached Exhibit B to this Agreement.
1. Executive Committee Members’ Terms, Election, and Appointment:
• The members of the Executive Committee shall serve for initial terms of eighteen
(18) and twenty four (24) months, as designated on Exhibit B. Certain Executive
Committee members’ terms may be renewed, as appropriate, to fulfill the
objectives set forth in this MOU.
• No more than two County representatives may be designated as “voting
members” on the Executive Committee. Other County representatives serving on
the Executive Committee, in excess of two voting members, shall participate as
non-voting members.
• The four City members of the Executive Committee shall have staggered, rotating
terms to enable other participating municipalities to serve on the Executive
Committee, as desired. City members may serve a maximum of two (2)
consecutive terms.
• As City members’ terms expire, the Executive Committee shall survey interest
among all participating cities and elect new City members to the Executive
Committee to fill expired or vacant terms. The Committee’s selection of new City
members shall take into consideration such factors as the size of each
municipality, and location, to ensure that the Executive Committee constitutes a
diverse geographic representation of Anoka County.
• Election of Executive Committee members shall be accomplished by majority
vote, to take place at a regular meetings of the Committee, or by electronic
means (email) if a vacancy arises. .
2. Executive Committee Meetings:
• The Executive Committee members will hold regular meetings approximately
every other month, with the first meeting to be scheduled in the fall of 2018.
• At least two times per year, the Executive Committee will schedule broad
based meetings and invite a larger group of City officials and staff, community
partners, and other stakeholders, to provide updates and information
regarding the current priorities of the economic development collaboration.
• The Executive Committee may also communicate electronically (via email) to
review opportunities and give direction to subcommittees as needed.
3. Executive Committee Goals and Objectives:
• Define a Vision: The Executive Committee is responsible for gathering
information from its subcommittees to form a vision for the business climate
and opportunities within Anoka County. The Executive Committee will then
communicate that vision with all Cities, community partners and identified
stakeholders in the County.
3
• Develop a Strategic Plan. The Executive Committee will engage in strategic
planning, to develop goals, interim activities, and a Final Action Plan, within
applicable time frames as set by the Executive Committee.
• Communication. The Executive Committee will ensure that reliable
communication occurs with all subcommittees, and that cities and community
partners are kept informed of the progress and results of the collaboration.
• Review and Contracting. The Executive Committee will continually review its
progress and may enter into contracts with outside partners or private
companies, as required to effectively research and/or implement work
developed over the course of this project.
D. Subcommittees. The purpose of subcommittees is to ensure diversification of ideas and
representation across Anoka County in taking on specific tasks related to economic
development.
• The Executive Committee may, at any time during one of its regular meetings,
seek to establish, modify, or eliminate one or more subcommittees, which may
be comprised of County and City officials/staff, community partners, or other
public or private individuals or entities assisting in the economic development
collaboration.
• Subcommittees may also include additional advisory members with expertise
relevant to the work of the subcommittee.
• As of the date of this MOU, three Subcommittees have been formed: (1)
Alignment/Regionalism; (2) Readiness; (3) Marketing and Differentiation.
• Subcommittees should attempt to meet on a monthly basis if possible.
E. Reporting. The following persons/entities should provide written or oral monthly reports to
the Executive Committee:
a. Subcommittee Reports. All subcommittees shall promptly deliver reports to the
Executive Committee on matters which the subcommittee has addressed.
b. Economic Development Specialist. Anoka County will direct its Economic
Development Specialist (“ED Specialist”) to assist the Executive Committee and
other entities in this collaboration. The ED Specialist will report directly to the
County Administrator regarding day-to-day operations and activities. At the
request of the Executive Committee, the ED Specialist will provide reports to the
Executive Committee as to research outcomes and progress. The ED Specialist
may also be asked to present findings at the broader, semi-annual meetings
attended by cities, community partners, and other stakeholders.
F. Financial Contributions.
a. Economic Development Specialist. The County is subsidizing and monitoring the
activities of the Economic Development Specialist, described herein, to provide direct
project assistance and research in connection with this collaboration.
b. Budget and Cost Sharing. If the Executive Committee seeks continued services for
website and social media support, marketing assistance, or other outside services,
4
the cost allocation among cities and financial responsibilities will require execution of
separate agreements. On or around August of each calendar year, a proposed
budget for the following year will be voted on by the Executive Committee at a
regular meeting, and distributed to the members. An agreement for voluntary cost
sharing among participating municipalities will also be distributed, with the first
agreement effective for year 2019. Negotiation, execution, and administration of any
such cost sharing agreement must comply with applicable statutes and regulations.
Nothing in this MOU shall obligate the agencies or partners to obligate or transfer
any funds absent a separate agreement authorizing such contributions.
G. Modification: Material alternations, modifications, or variations of the terms of this MOU
must be reduced to writing as an amendment and signed by the parties. Election or
appointment of members to the Executive Committee, the formation of subcommittees, and
updates to Exhibits A and B to this MOU do not require formal amendment of this MOU.
H. Authorized Representatives. By signing this MOU, the undersigned certifies that he/she is
authorized to act and carry out the terms of this MOU.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding on
the dates indicated below.
County of Anoka:
_____________________________________
Rhonda Sivarajah, Chair
Anoka County Board of Commissioners
Attest:
Date: ______________________
_____________________________________
Jerry Soma, County Administrator
Date: ______________________
Connexus Energy:
_____________________________________
Bruce Sayler, Principal
Date: ______________________
NorthMetro Chamber of Commerce:
_____________________________________
Lori Higgins, President
Date: ______________________
5
City of Andover:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Anoka:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Bethel:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Blaine:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Centerville:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Circle Pines:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Columbia Heights:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
6
City of Columbus:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Coon Rapids:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of East Bethel:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Fridley:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Ham Lake:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Hilltop:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Lexington:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
7
City of Lino Lakes:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
Linwood Township:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Nowthen:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Oak Grove:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Ramsey:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of St. Francis:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
City of Spring Lake Park:
By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Date: ______________________
EXHIBIT A
“HOSTING AGENCIES”
FOR ANOKA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
County of Anoka Jerry Soma
County Administrator
2100 Third Ave., Ste 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-324-4715 Jerry.Soma@co.anoka.mn.us
County of Anoka Rhonda Sivarajah
Chair, Anoka County Board of
Commissioners
2100 Third Ave., Ste 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-324-4706 Rhonda.Sivarajah@co.anoka.mn.us
County of Anoka Scott Schulte
County Commissioner
2100 Third Ave., Ste 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-324-4712
Scott.Schulte@co.anoka.mn.us
County of Anoka Karen Skepper
Director of Community and
Government Relations
2100 Third Ave., Ste 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-227-5807 Karen.Skepper@co.anoka.mn.us
County of Anoka Jacquel Hajder
Economic Development Specialist
2100 Third Ave., Ste 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-324-4609 Jacquel.Hajder@co.anoka.mn.us
Connexus Energy Bruce Sayler
Principal/ Community Development
Connexus Energy
14601 Ramsey Blvd. NW
Ramsey, MN 55303
763-323-2600 Bruce.sayler@connexusenergy.com
Metro North
Chamber of
Commerce
Lori Higgins
21st Century Bank Building
9380 Central Ave. NE, Ste 320
Blaine, MN 55434
763-783-3553 lori@metronorthchamber.org
CITIES/TOWNSHIPS
Andover Joe Janish
Community Development Director
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
763-767-5140 j.janish@andovermn.gov
Anoka Doug Borglund
Community Development Director
City of Anoka
2015 First Avenue North
Anoka, MN 55303
763-576-2723 dborglunch@ci.anoka.mn.us
Bethel Ginger Berg
City Administrator
763-434-4366 info@bethelmn.govoffice2.com
City of Bethel
23820 Dewey St.
Bethel, MN 55005
Blaine Erik Thorvig
Economic Development Coordinator
City of Blaine
10801 Town Square Drive NE
Blaine, MN 55449
763-785-6147 ethorvig@ci.blaine.mn.us
Centerville Mark Statz
City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
651-429-3232
Ext. 10
mstatz@centervillemn.com
Circle Pines Patrick Antonen
City Administrator
City of Circle Pines
200 Civic Heights Circle
Circle Pines, MN 55014
763-231-2605 pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us
Columbia Heights Keith Dahl
Community Development Manager
City of Columbia Heights
590 40th Avenue NE
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
763-706-3675 kdahl@columbiaheightsmn.gov
Columbus Elizabeth Mursko
City Administrator
City of Columbus
16319 Kettle River Blvd.
Columbus, MN 55025
651-419-9003 cityadministrator@ci.columbus.mn.us
Coon Rapids Matt Brown
Economic Development Coordinator
City of Coon Rapids
11155 Robinson Drive
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
763-767-6451 mbrown@coonrapidsmn.gov
East Bethel Colleen Winter
Community Development Director
City of East Bethel
2241 221st Ave. NE
East Bethel, MN 55011
763-367-7855 colleen.winter@ci.east-bethel.mn.us
Fridley Scott Hickok
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
763-572-3590 Scott.hickok@fridleymn.gov
Ham Lake Denise Webster
City Clerk
City of Ham Lake
15544 Central Avenue NE
Ham Lake, MN 55304
763-235-1680 dwebster@ci.ham-lake.mn.us
Hilltop Ruth Nelson
City Clerk
763-571-2023 rnelson@hilltop.govoffice.com
City of Hilltop
4555 Jackson St. NE
Hilltop, MN 55421
Lexington Bill Petracek
City Administrator
City of Lexington
9180 Lexington Avenue
Lexington, MN 55014
763-784-2792 bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org
Lino Lakes Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
651-982-2427 michael.grochala@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us
Linwood Township Pam Olson
Town Clerk
Linwood Township
22817 Typo Creek Drive NE
Stacy, MN 55079
651-462-2812 pam.olson@linwoodtownship.org
Nowthen _____________
City of Nowthen
8188 199th Avenue NW
Nowthen, MN 55330
763-441-1347 _____________________
Oak Grove Loren Wickham
City Administrator
City of Oak Grove
19900 Nightingale St. NW
Oak Grove, MN 55011-9204
763-404-7075 lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us
Ramsey Tim Gladhill
Community Development Director
City of Ramsey
7550 Sunwood Drive NW
Ramsey, MN 55303
763-433-9826 tgladhill@cityoframsey.com
St. Francis Kate Thunstrom
Community Development Director
City of St. Francis
23340 Cree Street NW
St. Francis, MN 55070
763-267-6191 kthunstrom@stfrancismn.org
Spring Lake Park Dan Buchholtz
City Administrator
City of Spring Lake Park
1301 81st Avenue NE
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
763-784-6491
dbuchholtz@slpmn.org
August 30, 2018
EXHIBIT B
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
ENTITY MEMBER/REPRESENTATIVE INITIAL TERM CONTACTS
County of Anoka Jerry Soma
County Administrator
*Non-voting
member
Jerry.Soma@co.anoka.mn.us
T: 763-324-4715
County of Anoka Jacquel Hajder
Economic Development Specialist
*Non-voting
member
Jacquel.Hajder@co.anoka.mn.us
T: 763-324-4609
County of Anoka Scott Schulte
Anoka County Commissioner
18 months
Or
Non-voting
member
Scott.Schulte@co.anoka.mn.us
T: 763-324-4712
County of Anoka Rhonda Sivarajah
Chair, Anoka County Board of
Commissioners
18 months
Or
Non-voting
member
Rhonda.Sivarajah@co.anoka.mn.us
T: 763-324-4706
County of Anoka Karen Skepper
Director of Community and
Government Relations
24 months Karen.Skepper@co.anoka.mn.us
T: 763-227-5807
Connexus Energy Bruce Sayler
Principal/ Community Development
Connexus Energy
24 months Bruce.sayler@connexusenergy.com
T: 763-323-2600
Metro North
Chamber of
Commerce
Lori Higgins
President
24 months lori@metronorthchamber.org
T: 763-783-3553
CITY MEMBERS
Columbia Heights Keith Dahl
Community Development Manager
City of Columbia Heights
18 months kdahl@columbiaheightsmn.gov
T: 763-706-3675
Coon Rapids Matt Brown
Economic Development Coordinator
City of Coon Rapids
24 months mbrown@coonrapidsmn.gov
T: 763-767-6451
East Bethel Colleen Winter
Community Development Director
City of East Bethel
18 months colleen.winter@ci.east-bethel.mn.us
T: 763-367-7855
Lino Lakes Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
24 months michael.grochala@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us
T: 651-982-2427
September 4, 2018
ACHRA Contract # C0006218A
1
VOLUNTARY COST SHARING AGREEMENT
FOR ANOKA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State
of Minnesota (“County”), and the undersigned participating municipality (“City”), a municipal
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the County and the City, along with other community partners, entered into
a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOU”) on __________________, 2018, to set goals, create an
action plan, and implement shared objectives in promoting economic development within Anoka
County;
WHEREAS, the MOU addresses the need for cost sharing between the County and
municipalities of Anoka County to support continued services for website services, social media
support, marketing assistance, and future services related to the county-wide economic
development initiative;
WHEREAS, an annual budget for the above activities was developed, including a
formula for participating municipalities to provide proportional cost sharing based upon its
population;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties understand and mutually agree as follows:
1. The budget for services related to website services, social media, marketing, and
other supportive activities required for economic development, is currently set at
$20,000.00 for calendar year 2019.
2. For 2019, the City agrees to contribute the sum of $0.057 per individual resident
within its city limits, as a voluntary contribution to the economic development
costs described above.
3. The City shall provide such payment annually, by the end of the first quarter in
each calendar year, beginning in 2019.
4. Each calendar year, the County will provide an annual budget and proposed
formula for the City’s use in calculating its contributions under this Agreement.
5. The City may opt out or cancel this Agreement by providing 30 days’ written
notice to the County Administrator: Jerry Soma, 2100 Third Avenue, Ste. 700,
Anoka, MN 55303.
6. This agreement shall terminate concurrently with the MOU, unless a City chooses
to opt out or cancel this agreement prior to its expiration, as provided above.
ACHRA Contract # C0006218A
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on
the dates written below:
ANOKA COUNTY HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: CITY OF [Enter City Name]:
By: _______________________________ By: _____________________________
Scott Schulte, Board Chair
ACHRA
Dated: _____________________________ Dated: ___________________________
By: ________________________________ By: _____________________________
Karen Skepper , Executive Director
ACHRA
Dated: _____________________________ Dated: ___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ______________________________ By: _____________________________
Christine Carney
Assistant County Attorney
MNCAR Properties Listing - Available site search engine on website,
and access to pull property information for RFP's or pull data for
businesses such as Traffic Counts, area demographics, etc.
$8,200
Minnesota Marketing Partnership - Anoka County will join 50 other
metropolitan economic development leaders to influence Minnesota's
economic development marketing strategy, increase Anoka County's
visibility and brand, bridge Minnesota Marketing with County-wide
marketing, and access to exclusive site selector events.
$625
MN Real Estate Journal - Event sponsorship and panel presentations -
Connect with the regions brokers and developers at events that are
often highly attended and informative. Invite cities as well. Events
could include the office summit, land development summit, etc.
$2,500-$10,000
UpRiver Event - This annual event is for commercial real estate
professionals to learn more about Anoka County, plus offering an
educational piece and 2 hours of CE credits - Cost for breakfast
provided and CE credit application
$1,500
Website Annual Cost to website host $375
Attend events sponsored or paid for in part or full by Greater MSP $0-50 per event
Attend NIOP Events - Commercial Real Estate Professional
Organization - Event topics -
-Big Picture Trends in Real Estate Capital -
Economic Risks & Opportunities for Commercial Real Estate
-Make Way for Gen Z
$25-$50 per event
2019 ACRED Spending Options
With the voluntary cost sharing agreement set at $20,000 there are a variety of options for
spending on marketing funds - options can be seen below. The main expense is the MNCAR
property feed that will be on the Anoka County website. Altough a large expense, the feed
is a landing spot for anyone looking for sites in Anoka County for sale or lease. A majority of
commercial real estate professionals are members. Professional reports can be generated
on any property, along with market reports that can be customized to each municipality.
Not all events or options can fit within the budget, but they are items that would qualify. At
the large group/local officials meeting in October. Cities will approve which items they
would like in the budget and approve a final list of expenditures for the budget in 2019.
Properties in Blue are expenditures that area either fixed cost for the website operation or
annual events that have strong support to continue
Marketing Materials (Banners, pamphlets, etc.) for Trade Shows and to
arm brand ambassadors with materials $1000-2000
Ad Campaigns that are sponsored to target audiences via LinkedIn or
Twitter- Topics could be to attract business, highlight the workforce,
highlight the quality of life, etc. 1. How Anoka
County is the best place to land your business 2. Anoka County
residents could support many more restaurants - here's why
3. Anoka County has the highest workforce participation in the state
$100-$500 per add
campaign
Success Stories - PR about companies that have recently located or
expanded in Anoka County $0
Hold an incentives workshop - determine what types of projects the
County and local EDOs would incent and how NA
Hold a talent strategies workshop - to work through potential
solutions to the issues identified. This workshop should include
employers, workforce development representatives, educational
institutions, etc.
$0
Host a Familiarization Tour with local real estate professionals Cost
would be for organizing transportation and possibly a lunch for those
that attend
$1,000
Attend Business Events and Expos - Entrepreneur Expo, Restaurant
Association Events, Manufacturing Week, Restaurant Innovation
Summit, Hospitality Minnesota, etc.
$0-$100 an event
Conduct Annual Business Summit - engage business leaders in
Economic Development initiative. This meeting should include an
educational piece to update employers on economic development
initiative and programs, but also gain their input into key challenges
they may be facing
$1,300
Summer Familiarization Tour (part of MN Marketing Partnership)
targeting HQ’s, consultants, consulates, prospects
- Depending on location, the cost is solely based upon travel, and if you
want to sponsor a lunch speaker ($1500) - part of MN Marketing
partnership
$500-$1,500
Fall - Minnesota Venture Conference
$400 or
Sponsorship -
$2000
WS – Item 7
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 7
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
Re: Arena Acres Park Update, Rick DeGardner
Background
On September 10, 2018 the Park Board, City staff, and Candace Amberg, Senior
Landscape Architect with WSB Engineering met with area residents of Arena Acres Park
to review conceptual plans and solicit feedback.
Attached is the master plan that was developed as a result of the September 10
discussion. This plan is being presented to the Park Board this evening for approval.
The tennis court amenity was strongly supported by residents attending the September 10
meeting. In order to expedite the construction of the tennis court, staff is recommending
proceeding with the installation of the class 5 aggregate base material and non-wear
course bituminous this Fall. This will allow the base and non-wear course layers to
experience a freeze/thaw cycle prior to the installation of the wear course layer. This
should provide a better end product.
Funding for this project was included in the Park Board’s recommendation of 2018 Parks
and Trails Capital Projects that was presented at the May 7, 2018 work session.
Requested Council Direction
Allow staff to coordinate the grading and installation of the base material this Fall.
Completion of the tennis court would then occur in the Spring of 2019.
Attachments
Arena Acres Master Plan
INSERT CLIENT LOGO ARENA ACRES MASTER PLAN 20’
SCALE IN FEET
10’0’40’
Project Number: 012396-000
September 17, 2018
K:
\
0
1
2
3
9
6
-
0
0
0
\
C
a
d
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
0
1
2
3
9
6
-
0
0
0
A
r
e
n
a
A
c
r
e
s
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
EXISTING
BASKETBALL
COURT
EXISTING
PLAYGROUND
EXISTING
WOODED AREA
OPEN LAWN
6’ CONCRETE WALK
PICNIC SHELTER
PROPOSED
SHADE TREE (TYP)
PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN
TENNIS COURT
PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN SUMMARY
PRIMARY PRIORITIES:
• SINGLE TENNIS COURT
• OPEN LAWN AREA
• BITUMINOUS ACCESS TRAIL
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS
TOTAL: $110,000*
AN
D
A
L
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
WOOD DUCK TRAIL
EXISTING
TREE (TYP)
*ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND BASED ON A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND DO
NOT REFLECT ANY UNKNOWN SITE CONDITIONS
OR POTENTIAL SOIL CORRECTIONS THAT WOULD
AFFECT THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
8’ BITUMINOUS TRAIL
FUTURE PRIORITIES
• PICNIC SHELTER
• CONCRETE WALKS (FORM LOOP)
• REPLACE EXISTING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS
TOTAL: $127,000*
1
WS – Item #8
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 8
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Katie Larsen, City Planner
Re: West Shadow Lake Drive Rezoning
Background
As discussed at the July 2, 2018 Council Work Session, with the extension of public utilities
along West Shadow Lake Drive, larger lots may be able to subdivide subject to City Zoning and
Shoreland Ordinance regulations. Several residents have inquired about the process for doing
this.
The first step in this process is to rezone the area from R, Rural to R-1X, Single Family
Executive Residential District as discussed at the July 2nd Work Session. There are
approximately 74 parcels that would be rezoned. The majority of these parcels are currently
legal non-conforming because they do not meet the minimum 10 acre rural lot size requirement.
Rezoning will make these parcels more conforming and consistent with other single family home
lots served by municipal water and sanitary sewer.
The following summarizes the Zoning and Shoreland District requirements for non-riparian and
riparian lots:
• For those non-riparian lots on the west side of West Shadow Lake Drive that do not
directly abut Reshanau Lake:
R-1X Requirements
Min. Lot Size1 12,825 sf
Min. Lot Width Interior Lot = 90 ft
Corner Lot = 115 ft
Min. Lot Depth 135 ft
Building Setback (feet)
-From Local Streets 30 ft
-Rear Yard
2
--Principal 30 ft
-Accessory 5 ft
-Side Yard
--Principal 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft
Impervious Surface2 30%
1Net area required as defined as contiguous buildable land
2Per Shoreland Management Overlay District
Shoreland Management Overlay District (Chapter 1102)
• Reshanau Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Lake per the MNDNR.
• The Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) is 883.5.
• For those riparian lots on the east side of West Shadow Lake Road that directly abut
Reshanau Lake:
R-1X Requirements
Min. Lot Size1 20,000 sf
Min. Lot Width2 90 ft
Min. Lot Depth 135 ft
Building Setback (feet)
-From Local Streets 30 ft
-From OHWL3
--Principal 75 ft
-Accessory 75 ft
-Side Yard
--Principal 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft
Impervious Surface4 30%
1Only land above the OHWL can be used to meet the lot area standards
2Lot width standards must be met at both the OHWL and the building setback line
3One water-oriented accessory structure may be setback 10 feet from the OHWL
4Per Shoreland Management Overlay District
3
Any proposed variances will be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board and City Council on a
case by case basis as property owners goes through the subdivision process.
The following is a tentative schedule for the rezoning:
Planning & Zoning Board Holds
Public Hearing: November 14, 2018
City Council 1st Reading: November 26, 2018
City Council 2nd Reading: December 10, 2018
Ordinance Effective: January 10, 2019
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting Council direction to initiate the rezoning process.
Attachments
1. Zoning Map
0 400 800200
Feet
BI R C H STBIRCH ST
PPAARR
TT
RRIIDDGGEE PPLL
A
Q
U
A
L
N
A
Q
U
A
L
N
LANTERN CIR
LANTERN CIR
BLACK DUCK DR
BLACK DUCK DR
WWEESSTTSSHHAADDOOWWLLAAKKEEDDRR
R-1
R
PSPPSP
R-1R-1
R-1X
PSP
R-1
R
PSP
PSP
R
R-1X
PSP
PSP
R-1
PSP
PSP
WARDS LAKE
RESHANAU LAKEOHWL 883.5FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887
RICE LAKEOHWL 883.1FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887
CENTERVILLE LAKEOHWL 885.0FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.9
Zoning MapWest Shadow Lake Drive µ
Legend
ParcelLinoLakesMN.DBO.ZoningDistrictZoning Description
RuralRural ExecutiveSingle Family ResidentialSingle Family ExecutiveTwo Family ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialHigh Density ResidentialManufactured Hom e ParkLimited BusinessGeneral BusinessNeighborhood BusinessGeneral In dustrialLight IndustrialRural/Business ReservePublic Semi-PublicPUD
WS – Item 9
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 9
Date: October 1, 2018
To: City Council
From: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
Re: Council Compensation
Background
At the last work session on September 4, staff recommended the council adopt an
ordinance that would increase council salaries. The mayor and councilmembers last
received a raise in 2008-2010.
Staff recently conducted a salary survey comparing salaries of mayors and
councilmembers, which showed that Lino Lakes is considerably below the average
compared to cities of similar size. Based on what council salaries are projected to be in
2019 amongst these cities, the mayor is below average by 42% and councilmembers are
nearly 36% below the average.
Mayor Reinert proposed a 39% across-the-board increase. There was also a
recommendation to increase the special meeting stipend from $40 to $60 since the
stipend had not increased in 27 years. The council further agreed to increase the EDA
member meeting stipend from $35 to $40, and to lower the EDA president stipend from
$50 to $40.
After further discussion, staff was directed to gather more information, including the
average number of council meetings per month in the comparison cities and any
additional compensation that other city councils receive for extra meetings.
Staff obtained this information and updated the survey that was previously distributed to
the council.
Attachments
Council Compensation Survey
Item #11
Monthly Progress Report
October 1, 2018
Item Last Action Taken Staff Status
Digital Scanning Project 8/7/17 – City Clerk provided a written
report of what has been completed
Julie Scanning Operator Rusty Ray
submitted his resignation.
Staff will discuss how to
proceed.
White Bear Lake Restoration
Assn. v. Dept. of Natural
Resources (DNR)
5/21/18 – HF 4003 was signed into law
by the governor, which temporarily
suspends enforcement of the water
appropriation permit amendments
Jeff The law is effective through
July 1, 2019
Labor Negotiations Update 6/25/18 – AFSCME contract was
approved by Council
9/10/18 – Local 49 contract was approved
by Council
8/15/18 – Arbitration hearing with LELS
299 (Police Officers) was held
6/25/18 – LELS 260 (Sergeants) filed for
arbitration
Jeff Police Officers – Arbitration
decision expected in October
Sergeants – Arbitration has
been scheduled for November
20th
Employment Update Sept. 2018 – Vacant police officer was
posted
Jeff Staff is anticipating three staff
retirements in the coming
months