HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01-2024 Park Board Packet
PARK BOARD MEETING
Monday, April 1, 2024
6:30 pm
*******************
Lino Lakes Civic Complex-Blue Heron Room
Park Board Members: Pat Huelman (Chair), Clark Gooder, William Kusterman,
Julie Ann Cutts, Kellie Schmidt, Kathy Ballering, and Jason Spitzer
Public Services Director: Rick DeGardner
Administrative Assistant: Angela Thorson
AGENDA
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Swearing in of Park Board Members
4. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
5. Approval of the Agenda
6. Open Mike
7. Approval of March 6, 2024 Minutes
8. Review Park Dedication Fee Study
9. Next Scheduled Park Board Meeting - Monday, May 6, 2024
10. Adjourn
Park Board
March 6, 2024
pg. 1
DRAFT MINUTES
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PARK BOARD MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Huelman called the Lino Lakes Park Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on March
6, 2024.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
4. OPEN MIKE
Pat Mahr, President of the Centennial Little League discussed the progress on Sunrise
Field dugouts and moving the fences. Discussed the potential new ball field, parking lot
ideas, and the number of ball players for the 2024 season.
Mr. Kusterman expressed his concern that the balls in the parking lot will strike the cars.
Mr. Mahr said that to prevent the cars from being struck, they could let the smaller
children play on such fields.
5. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6, 2023 AND JANUARY 3, 2024 MINUTES
Mrs. Schmidt moved to approve the December 6, 2023 meeting minutes. Motion
seconded by Mr. Gooder. Mr. Kusterman abstained Motion carried 4 – 0.
Mr. Kusterman moved to approve the January 3, 2024 meeting minutes. Motion
seconded by Mrs. Ballering. Mr. Gooder abstained Motion carried 4 – 0.
DATE: March 6, 2024
TIME STARTED: 6:32 p.m.
TIME ENDED: 8:18 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Patrick Huelman, Clark Gooder,
Kellie Schmidt, William Kusterman,
Kathy Ballering,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Julie Cutts
STAFF PRESENT: Rick DeGardner, Angela Thorson
Park Board
March 6, 2024
pg. 2
DRAFT MINUTES
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Pheasant Hills Park Email Request
Mr. Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director gave a summary that he and Pat Huelman
received an email on February 27, 2024, from Mr. Marciano requesting the City consider
converting the existing ½ court basketball court to pickleball at Pheasant Hills Park. If the
Park Board decides to change to pickleball courts, they will have to address that there is
no parking except for on-street parking. Mr. DeGardner discussed the locations of
pickleball courts in Lino Lakes.
Mr. Huelman discussed that the ½ court basketball court will not be able to be a duel
court.
Mrs. Schmidt stated she has seen children using the basketball courts at the parks.
Mr. Huelman doesn’t like to remove assets from the park system, especially from the age
groups that use the basketball courts.
Mr. Kusterman stated he would not like to remove an existing asset from the park. Also,
stated destination pickleball courts make more sense than placing pickleball courts in
neighborhood parks.
7. CONTINUE PARK BOARD DISCUSSION
Mr. DeGardner gave a summary that the Park Board continues to gather information and
discuss several topics related to the development and redevelopment of the parks and
trails system.
Mr. Huelman wants to discuss the trail system, what the outstanding trail needs are, and
would like to get in front of the City Council sooner rather than later.
Mr. DeGardner discussed the plan for future trails.
Mrs. Schmidt discussed how the parks are for the children and the trails are for the adults.
Trails are an important part of our community.
Mr. DeGardner asked if there are certain trials that the Park Board wants to prioritize.
Mr. Kusterman appreciates dedicating more funds to the trail system. Mr. Kusterman
asked if we could piggyback off the transportation department funds for trails.
Mr. DeGardner discussed trail development with county road projects.
Mr. Huelman discussed the trail on the south side of Birch Street.
Park Board
March 6, 2024
pg. 3
DRAFT MINUTES
Mr. Gooder stated that the focus should be on the parks.
Mr. Huelman discussed the park and trail asset summary.
Mr. Kusterman discussed giving the City Council a storyline.
Mrs. Ballering stated that the City Council should be told what happens if we don’t
receive more funding for the park system.
Mr. Gooder discussed touching base with City Council members before the work session.
Mrs. Schmidt identified three high-priority parks on her list: Marshan Park, Highland
Meadow Park, and Behm’s Park.
Mr. Gooder discussed moving Marshan Park further down on the list for replacement.
Mr. Kusterman discussed how Wenzel Park has an older community but could turn into a
younger community. What happens if the park is removed? What happens to that area?
Mr. Huelman would like a nice park shelter at Lino Park, an update to City Hall Park, and
Pheasant Hills Park.
Mr. Gooder agrees with updating City Hall Park.
Mr. Kusterman would like to recommend five replacement parks to the City Council.
Mr. Huelman also wants to include Highland Meadows Park on the list.
9. NEXT SCHEDULED PARK BOARD MEETING
Wednesday, April 1, 2024
10. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Gooder moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Kusterman. Meeting
adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Angela Thorson, Public Services Administrative Assistant
DATE: April 1, 2024
TO: Park Board
FROM: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
RE: Park Dedication Fee Study
Staff will provide a walk-through of the draft Park Dedication Fee Study (see attached) in
preparation of our meeting with the City Council on May 6. Pat Huelman will also share a draft of
his presentation.
Park Dedication Fee Study
November 2023
DRAFT
Introduction
Main Purpose
The natural open space in Lino Lakes is a key resource to the City and its identity. Developing
in a way that is in harmony with existing natural landscape and fosters a high quality of life for
residents is driving force behind the work the City does, especially in regards to its parks,
greenways, and trails.
The Park Dedication Fee Study seeks to analyze the costs of park system development in order
to better determine funding sources, with a particular focus on new development and park
dedication fees. This process is guided by the Park, Greenways and Trails Plan established in
the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The results of analysis will show breakdowns of
costs related to parks, trails, and the recreation complex, as well as show the projected revenue
from park dedication fees related to residential and commercial development. With this
information, the City can assess its funding structure and make recommendations for the future
in order to best carrying out the plan.
Background
Chapter 10 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan presents the Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan,
which brings together previous studies into a cohesive plan regarding parks, greenways, trail
systems, and preserving the natural open space character of the city. It aims to meet a wide
variety of recreational needs.
The primary sections utilized for this study are the Parks, Greenways & Trail System;
Neighborhood Service Areas; and Park Evaluations. The Parks, Greenway & Trail System map
shows existing parks within the system, as well as the general areas where future parks will be
developed. The Neighborhood Service Areas map conveys the additional information of
neighborhood park service areas. Together, these items are used to create an inventory of
existing and planned parks and group them together based on timing of development and
service area. The Park Evaluations section assesses existing parks in the City looking at current
development, age, condition, accessibility and design, and discusses future development and
redevelopment. Cost estimates for developing and maintaining each park at its optimum
condition are covered as well. This information is used to determine future costs for new
development and improvements. Details regarding the trail system and recreation complex are
present in the mentioned sections and other portions of the Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan.
The complete Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan can be found at the following web address:
https://linolakes.us/DocumentCenter/View/436/2040-Comprehensive-Plan-PDF
This analysis helps properly determine a park dedication fee for the City of Lino Lakes.
Minnesota Statute § 462.358 provides the statutory authority for municipalities to require either
a land dedication or payment in lieu of land dedication at the time of property subdivision. The
City must demonstrate that is an essential nexus between the fees or dedication imposed under
subdivision 2b and the municipal purpose sought to be achieved by the fee or dedication. The
fee or dedication must bear a rough proportionality to the need created by the proposed
subdivision or development.
DRAFT
10-5
Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½
¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½
¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kjkj
kj
kj
kj
ú
úúBaldwin Lake
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilkinson
Lake
Otter Lake
Amelia
Lake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
Centerville
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
Lilac
St
20th Ave S456721
456749
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456754
456754
456714456714
20thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")140
")84
")84
Main
StMainStMain St
Cedar
St
HodgsonRdLake DrElm St
Birch St
Birch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr62nd St N
Ash St RondeauLakeRd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th St
A
B C
D
E
I
J
H
F GK
L
M
N
White Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of Columbus
City of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview
!2
!3
!4
!5
!7
!10
!11 !12 !13 !14
!15
!16
!17
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!18
!1
!6
!8
!9
´
Figure 10-1
Parks, Greenways & Trail System
Legend
City of Centerville
kj Future Neighborhood Park
Search Area's
ú Existing Tunnel
ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge
Water Trail
NE Drainage Outlet
Existing Asphalt
Existing Concrete Trail
Existing Boardwalk Trail
Proposed Trails
!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route
Existing Regional Trail
Proposed Regional Trail
Greenway System
Undeveloped Park
City Parks
Regional Parks
Open Water
Municipal Boundary
Parcels
Streams
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019
1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres
2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S
3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S
4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park
5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park
6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex
7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park
8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park
9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park
11/9/2020
DRAFT
10-10
Figure 10-2� Park Service Areas
kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kjkj
kj
kj
kj
ú
úúBaldwin Lake
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilkinson
Lake
Otter Lake
Amelia
Lake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
Centerville
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
Lilac
St
20th Ave S456721
456749
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456754
456754
456714456714
20thAve20th Ave§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")140
")84
")84
Main
StMainStMain St
Cedar
St
HodgsonRdLake DrElm St
Birch St
Birch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr62nd St N
Ash St RondeauLakeRd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th St
A
B C
D
E
I
J
H
F GK
L
M
N
White Bear TownshipCity of BlaineCity of Circle PinesCity of Columbus
City of HugoCity of North OaksCity of Shoreview
!2
!3
!4
!5
!7
!10
!11 !12 !13 !14
!15
!16
!17
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!18
!1
!6
!8
!9
´
Figure 10-2
Neighborhood Service Areas
Legend
City of Centerville
kj Future Neighborhood Park
Search Area's
ú Existing Tunnel
ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge
Existing Asphalt
Existing Concrete Trail
Existing Boardwalk Trail
Proposed Trails
Existing Regional Trail
Proposed Regional Trail
Greenway System
Undeveloped Park City
Property
City Parks
Regional Parks
School
Neighborhood Park Service
Area
Open Water
Municipal Boundary
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019
1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres
2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S
3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S
4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park
5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park
6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex
7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park
8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park
9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park
11/9/2020
DRAFT
Analysis
To assess costs and funding for park development, three general steps were carried out:
determining park improvement costs and funding sources, estimating park dedication revenue,
and a comparison of expenditures and revenue.
Determining Park Improvement Costs and Funding Sources
The first step in this process is to break down the costs for each park’s improvements and
development. Parks are divided into two groups: those that currently exist or planned to be
developed by 2040 and those planned to be developed after 2040, as laid out by the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. Parks are further grouped based on which neighborhood park service
area (PSA) they belonged to. The following information is collected for each park:
1. Stage (when it is planned to be developed)
2. Percent Developed
3. Improvements
4. Expenditures — Replacement Cost, New Development Cost, Land Acquisition, and
Trails
5. Funding Source — Park Dedication and General Fund
Total Expenditures, and the Funding Source categories of Park Dedication and General Fund
are totaled to get summary figures for pre 2040 park development and post 2040 park
development. Total Park Dedication, or the total funding needed from park dedication given the
current plan, is what is of most interest and used in the final step of this analysis.
Notes are provided for each park if there are additional pertinent details. More information on
exactly how these figures are determined can be found in Appendix A.
Estimating Residential Park Dedication Revenue
The next step of this analysis is to understand revenue from park dedication given current fees.
A minimum and maximum total expected revenue is calculated based on minimum and
maximum new units that can be developed and the current dedication fee of $3,300 per unit.
This is broken into pre and post 2040 development. More information of how these values are
calculated can be found in Appendix C.
Comparing Expenditures and Revenue
The final step of this process is to compare the expected costs of new development and park
dedication revenue to assess the City’s park dedication fee. This section compares new
development costs, new arterial trails costs, and recreation complex costs to park dedication fee
revenue in order to calculate an estimate for the fee it would take to cover these costs in both
the pre and post 2040 time periods. More information regarding how this was tabulated can be
found in Appendix D.
With the study including estimates for post 2040 development, it assumes the development of a
second recreation complex. Though there is not one planned at this time, the funding that is
being accounted for the additional recreation complex could be used to enhance or expand the
first.
DRAFT
Recommendations
1.Increase park dedication fee to $3,700 per unit for residential development from the
current $3,300 fee.
2.Increase commercial and residential fees annually according to Engineering News
Record (ENR) Index.
3.Distribute park dedication fees by function ratio i.e., park development (73%), arterial
trail (17%) and recreation complex (10%).
4.Establish a policy for interfund loans between neighborhood service areas and functional
categories.
DRAFT
Appendix A
Determining Park Improvement Costs and Funding Sources
Stage refers to what stage each park falls under according to the 2040 Utility Staging Plan. The
Percent Developed is determined by evaluating each park and identifying what is missing or still
needs to be built. Improvements are those that are listed out in the Park Evaluation section of
the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. These improvements include both repairs or replacements and
new development.
Expenditures break down costs into four categories: Replacement Cost, New Development
Cost, Land Acquisition, and Trail. Costs for replacement and new development come from 2040
Comprehensive Plan. When a range of costs is listed in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the
midpoint/average is used. Land Acquisition is mainly relevant to future parks, but is based on
land cost value of $50,000 per acre. Trail costs where determined from WSB estimates and the
lineal feet of proposed trails. More information regarding how this is calculated can be found in
the Appendix B. It is important to note that Trail Expenditures does not include trails that are
within the park as these are considered part of Replacement and New Development Costs.
Parks that do not exists yet, but are planned, differ slightly from established parks. Their New
Development costs are based on estimates, which have been adjusted for inflation, provided by
WSB for a standard 5-6 acre park. Land Acquisition expenditures is calculated based on the
assumption that each park will be 6 acres.
Funding Source is broken down into two categories: Park Dedication and General Fund. The
values for these indicate how much money is needed from each funding source to cover the
expenditures. Park Dedication can only be used for new development, not on replacements or
repairs. This is the found by summing New Development Cost, Land Acquisition, and Trail
Expenditures. The General Fund can be used for any park improvements and, for the purpose
of this study, is composed of only Replacement Cost expenditures and a portion of the
recreation complex.
DRAFT
3-14
Figure 3-4� 2040 Utility Staging Plan
Baldwin Lake
Rondeau
Lake
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Wilkinson
Lake
Otter Lake
Amelia
Lake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
Centerville
Lake
Marshan Lake
George
Watch
Lake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
Lilac
St
20th Ave S456721
456749
456754
456721
456749
456714
456754
456714
456723
456721
456721
456714456714
20th Ave20th Ave§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
")153
")140
")84
")84
Main StMain StMain St
Cedar St
HodgsonRdLake DrElm St
Birch St
Birch StLake DrSunset AveRondeauLake Dr EAsh St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr62nd St N
Ash St RondeauLake Rd WCentervilleRdHolly Dr4th AveHolly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
64th StCity of BlaineCity of Columbus
City of HugoCity of North Oaks White Bear Township ´
Figure 3-4
2040 Utility Staging Plan
Legend
City of Centerville
Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2018 - 2025)
Stage 1B Planned Service Area (2025 - 2030)
Stage 2A Planned Service Area (2030 - 2035)
Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2035 - 2040)
Stage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2040)
No Service
Open Water
Right-of-Way
Municipal Boundary
Parcels
Streams
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 5/20/201911/9/2020
DRAFT
Appendix B
Calculating Trail Costs
WSB provided total trail mileage for each PSA. This is multiplied by midpoint of the shared use
path cost estimate, also provided by WSB, to find total cost of planned trail development in each
area.
Trail costs are also broken down between pre and post 2040 development. This is done by
multiplying the cost per PSA by the percentage planned to be completed by 2040 and post
2040. The percentage of trails developed in each time period comes from the 2040 Utility
Staging Plan. The pre and post 2040 figures are divided by the number of parks in each PSA to
get a figure for Trail Expenditure for every park.
There are currently no proposed trails in PSAs 8, 20, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 in the Parks,
Greenways and Trails Plan. Additionally, WSB identified 18.74 miles of arterial trails which fall
outside of any PSA. Costs are calculated for this set of arterial trials using the same methods
described above but are not assigned to any park or PSA in particular. These costs are factored
into tabulations comparing total expenditures and revenue.
DRAFT
Appendix C
Estimating Residential Park Dedication Revenue
To calculate the estimated residential park dedication fees, WSB provided a table of every
parcel in the City. Each parcel is then assigned to a PSA. The net acres of these parcels are
split according to the staging area they fall into resulting in two categories: pre 2040 category
(stages 1 and 2) and post 2040 category (stage 3). The minimum and maximum number of units
that can be developed is calculated for each category according to the proposed future land
use. These figures are multiplied by the current park dedication fee ($3,300 per unit) to get a
minimum and maximum total residential park dedication sum for each category in every PSA.
These are totaled to get an overall minimum and maximum park dedication revenue, pre and
post 2040, for the City.
DRAFT
Appendix D
Comparing Expenditures and Revenue
Costs for new development come from three different sources: parks, arterial trails, and the
recreation complex. These values have already been calculated in previous steps of this
analysis and divided into pre 2040 and post 2040. Additional infomration regarding these
calculations can be found in Appendices A and B.
Total revenue from park dedication is composed of residential and commercial/industrial units.
The minimum and mid (average) number units for residential and commercial are used to make
this calculation, each is multiplied by their current respective dedication fee and totaled. These
are summed to get a total revenue for minimum and average number of units pre and post
2040.
More information concerning how the number of residential units and resulting park dedication
revenue is found can be located in Appendix C. Data regarding commercial/industrial units is
based on Datafi data of undeveloped commercial/industrial property along 35E. 20% of this land
is removed from this value to account for arterial roads and wetlands.
Total revenue is subtracted from total cost in order to determine whether there would be a
surplus or deficit given the estimated costs and revenues. Total cost was also divided by the
number of residential units in order to quantify the park dedication fee for residential units
needed to cover all new development costs a part of the Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan. The
number of residential units are the minimum and mid amounts provide by WSB and described in
Appendix C.
DRAFT