HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240424 Environmental Board Packet Combined CITY OF LINO LAKES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
6:30 p.m.
Council Chambers
Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. SWEARING IN OF BOARD MEMBERS
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 28, 2024
6. OPEN MIKE
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Natures Refuge North — Restoration and Tree Mitigation Plan
8. ACTION ITEMS
A. Linda Avenue Addition - Preliminary Plat
9. UPDATES
10. RECYCLING UPDATES
11. ADJOURN
Meeting guidelines on reverse side.
City of lino lakes Environmental Board
MEETING GUIDELINES
Open Mike—The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When
presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful and follow these guidelines:
• Please address the meeting chair.
• State your name and address for the record.
• Please observe a 4-minute limit.
• The topic must relate to city business.
• Open Mike is for items not on the agenda.
• A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more—groups will have 8 minutes.
• The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations.
• Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only.
Public Hearing—Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your
opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing
follows these steps:
• The Presiding Officer(Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for
the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings.
• Staff will present their report on the proposal.
• Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal.
• The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to
comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions
about the proposal.
Comments should be limited to four(4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding
Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board
Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person
shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the
Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer.
• After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments,the Presiding
Officer shall close the public hearing.
• The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed.
• The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision.
When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state
your name and address for the record.
Occasionally,the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action.
Meeting Etiquette
The Environmental Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A
resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of
the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of
the Board.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING
DATE: February 28, 2024
TIME STARTED: 6:30 p.m.
TIME ENDED: 7:37 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Sullivan, Cassie Cavegn, Lindsay
Buchmeier, Shawn Holmes, Jonathan
Parsons, Julia Nelson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alex Schwartz
STAFF PRESENT: Andrew Nelson, Rebekah Olinger,Julie
Whitney
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Sullivan called the Environmental meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on February 28,
2024.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ms. Holmes made a motion to approve the January 31, 2024 meeting minutes. Motion
was seconded by Mr. Parsons. Motion carried 6-0.
5. OPEN MIKE
Chair Sullivan declared open mike at 6:32 p.m. There was no one present for open mike
therefore it was closed at 6:32 p.m.
Environmental Board
February 28,2024
Page 2
6. ACTION ITEMS
A. 440 Park Court (Lino Lakes Tech Center and Storage Facility) Conditional Use
Permit and Site Plan Review
Mr. Nelson presented the staff report.
The applicant, Lariat Companies, Inc., submitted a land use application for conditional
use permit and site plan review. The development proposes a 36,000 sf multi-tenant
industrial and indoor self-storage building on the south end of the site. The north end
of the site is the existing Lino Lakes Storage. The architect, Greg Kinney with Amcon
Construction was in attendance with no comments or questions asked.
The Board discussed the proposed 440 Park Court Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan
Review and requested to add the 71" recommendation that was not in the staff report
but was on the slide show concerning perimeter control near the wetland.
Motion was made by Ms. Buchmeier and seconded by Ms. Cavegn to approve the
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review with the addition to the 71n
recommendation. Motion carried 6-0.
B. 2024 Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Tasks List—2nd Draft
Mr. Nelson presented the staff report.
The Environmental Board serves to provide aid and advice to the Council in its efforts to
encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between people and their environment;
to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and
stimulate the health and welfare of people; to enrich the understanding of the
ecological systems and natural resources important to the city; to advise the city in the
use and management of its natural resources in order to preserve and enhance the
environmental amenities for present and future residents, and to improve and ensure a
lasting quality of life within the City. (City Code Chapter 217.01).
Chair Sullivan mentioned that the term 'biodiversity' didn't appear in the work plan.
Ms. Holmes stated that the term wasn't included but that the concept was covered.
Chair Sullivan also pointed out a typo on the numbering of the ongoing tasks list under
natural resources. Number "3" should be changed to number "1".
Mr. Nelson responded that the typo would be corrected.
DRAFT MINUTES
Environmental Board
February 28,2024
Page 3
Motion was made by Ms. Holmes and seconded by Ms. Nelson to approve the 2024
Annual Work Plan and Ongoing Task List. Motion carried 6—0.
7. UPDATES
A. Recycling Updates
Ms. Rebekah Olinger, Recycling Intern, presented the recycling updates.
8. ADJOURN
Ms. Buchmeier made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:37 p.m.
Motion was seconded by Ms. Cavegn. Motion carried 6—0.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Whitney, Community Development Administrative Assistant
DRAFT MINUTES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 7A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator
MEETING DATE: April 24th, 2024
REQUEST: Discussion only.
TOPIC: Natures Refuge North—Restoration and Tree Mitigation Plan
BACKGROUND
Natures Refuge North is a proposed subdivision with 99 single-family residential lots on an
approximately 59.3 acres site located just north of the Natures Refuge development on Main Street.
The Environmental Board first reviewed a concept plan for the Natures Refuge North project at the
October 25th, 2023 meeting. Since the initial meetings with the Environmental Board and Planning and
Zoning Board,the developer, M/1 Homes, has been working through the recommendations and
requirements to further explore the feasibility of the project.
A tree inventory has been completed that identified 6,400 trees on the site, with approximately 4,600
removals. The developer's estimate for replacement trees required is 3,900 trees. This would equate to
a tree mitigation cost ranging from $1.3-$2.3 million dollars. While all of these numbers are
approximate and refinement of the project plan is ongoing, these numbers could impact the feasibility
of the project. The developer has reached out to the City in the hopes of finding a collaborative solution
that may lead to a better long-term outcome for the outlots and natural areas. Additionally,the
developer continues to find ways to minimize impacts to existing trees.
Emily Becker, Land Development and Entitlements Manager with M/l Homes, will be present at tonight's
meeting to discuss the development and potential alternatives/supplements to the tree mitigation.
While the tree mitigation section of the landscape ordinance works well for most projects, there are
sites for which strict adherence to mitigation numbers may not lead to the best outcome from the
perspective of native plant communities. Natures Refuge North, for example, is located in an area with
many rare and protected species of plants and animals that rely on certain habitat conditions for their
survival. Many wetland plants are adapted to full sunlight and may not persist beneath heavy tree
canopy. Oak savanna habitat, which was also common in the area historically, is characterized by sparse
tree canopy cover(5-50%)with prairie grasses and forbs in the understory. Wetlands and oak savanna
ecosystems both exhibit higher biodiversity than the closed-canopy woodland currently on the site.
The restoration of these historic and rare ecosystems may be preferable to strict adherence to the tree
mitigation numbers required by the Zoning Ordinance. Flexibility is provided for in the ordinance
language and supported by precedence set by other sites (including Natures Refuge).
• City Code Section 1007.049 (10)(e) states "Areas where trees are being removed for ecological
restoration in accordance with a city approved restoration plan are not subject to the tree
preservation and mitigation."
1
Sites that have higher restoration potential, long-term management agreements, or connectivity with
high-value greenway corridor components may all be areas for which alternatives to tree mitigation
numbers may be acceptable. Also, alternatives considered should exhibit some higher value results than
the tree planting alone would provide. Increased biodiversity; habitat enhancement for rare,
threatened, endangered, or special concern species; and expansion and/or creation of key habitats, such
as oak savanna; are all benefits that could be weighed against strict adherence to tree mitigation
numbers.
Alternatives to the tree mitigation described in ordinance have been utilized in the Foxborough, Saddle
Club, and Preserve conservation developments. In these areas, long-term stewardship plans were
prepared to achieve a more ecologically sound outcome. In these cases, planting the required amount
of trees would have been detrimental to the goals of restoring the native plant communities that were
historically present on the land.
In the Natures Refuge development,which is currently under construction just south of the proposed
project site, the mitigation requirement for removal of aspens in wetland buffer areas was waived in
recognition of the fact that native wetland plants would not be able to thrive under aspen canopy. The
same situation occurred in Saddle Club, with aspen removals in wetland buffers not subject to
mitigation.
Some ideas for consideration:
• Restoring/establishing native plant communities that resemble historical conditions would be
beneficial to rare plants and animals on or near the site and beneficial to biodiversity on the site
in general.
• Long-term management and stewardship would bring about a better result than would be
typical of natural areas or outlots in sites with less restoration potential. Establishment of a
stewardship fund would promote active management to benefit the land over time, as opposed
to installation of a manicured landscape that would provide minimal environmental benefit.
• Other aspects of the landscape ordinance will still be in effect. Highly valued landscape
components for the site, such as buffers in the northwest corner,will still be required.
• Baseline conditions of the site (current species list and abundance) should be gathered to
measure the outcome of management activities and gage success.
• The idea is not to eliminate mitigation tree planting, but to supplement tree planting with more
focus on native plant community restoration and establishment. This is particularly important in
areas that have connectivity with the larger wetland complex that extends from the site to the
northeast to the Wollan Park wetland bank.
At this point, staff would like to gather feedback from the Board on your willingness to support an
alternative to the estimated tree mitigation numbers for this site. Staff is recommending a collaboration
with the developer in the interest of achieving a final product that supports native plant communities,
rare plants and animals, and the historically significant ecosystem types that would have been present
on the land. If the Board is in favor of the latter option, a collaborative process will begin with
opportunities for input as the project progresses.
2
ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTION
Discussion only.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial Photo
2. Vegetated Areas Plan
3. Concept Plan/Aerial Photo Overlay
4. 2006 Concept Plan
5. Development Suitability Map
3
Natures Refuge North Aerial Photo
6!14M
Mi
r--
AV
.� �,;�, ,;,� _ �� \.- `�•� , � I����!. I!�'��� 1. ti`. ?. _ ��.
`,` _�. 'f. ,� .'f � r, _ E'S�''�,'�.` •�__ _ '., -yet•
.� fT •ti `- y1"-1. �f`�`.; � 'yam -'l '�{1,� I_�_.; r 4,= -
� •', ..''YJ .�N ice' �P". '-F_� v,i' � 'i� '��. ,a�
Y• y?Sn.�.1 .+•" 'x '� *, ��r*� r' �"r. - - ��-� � `� it. �' •i � *'�i
lY+ 99 •+! r• .h
10
Ear
' r1��z'*�.y'T� � ,•y ,���f, > i't � 7� ty� r _ \• ,�-k •FH. � �1
R.#`.�!, ^�.'• ''34"' r� i h'y is'� .,P 1111M,
.F a d. - r f
)FT IL
,;y3
r
{�_ ,P. -�. ''rf'���ff#1__ + �5.. •tt�J � Ru":•1 •«4 ":�t i�'. � fit' �'�'I��_T•_�,Y`t"--.
�t '*. J •"fir /* ,,� 4'Y'. 1 I�! :'t. J J ♦,�" -,i - a M� u�•
t. '"'S �` eY •r� � r�i ''t t. ^} 'l Rio '� '��i"i � �..-r3- z
4.
��;► . .�. �t ,`1���,T fit. # C � � c��j � '�. --.—
ley
k 'y _ , S j n, t �:P,F� gip' ,`..F ' �7�y� _�•"v�. aw t O A+F
lox
lo
tot
�/ `*• yr# y ` s102
�Ri r-.� �,�` �� ®RZ// �\'Jig ;� � �� - + `•, '�. .�t<'`a'� ..
-
�t ��= - QLS_ —'__rw�if+o___1. 6m7 '•911 '�.a.....—�''�'J••••��A`� ` ___.14-
_ - - -ems r a ,_ i�•
.AIR, . 4 e. � '�� �•'-' � rye
Parcels 1 in = 500 Ft
N
A
C I T Y ' 11 r October 19, 2023
L �j NL KEc Map Powered By Datafi
co
C7
- co
tztz �
_ d ',,-v '.`•r...- ---
a� o3 -a
82
61 m 87? 7675 � Q Q
E33
a�
®�®
V / r�
87
/ :64 7
56
�6755
106 10711061 1U ` _ 90 `\.\ 54
91 s3 1,:2
-�,. -•, 1.92 sz U.
r I \ 51
// / ` / I O a
�� 113L 95 50
96/ r� L_'_ 100 'Ik 94 / � Lo
Cti
97 ^�- `` :. •,�� �� \\l l 4g 4.3 1 47
99 'V.,i" ., f l 44
1 1
0( B x 1 \` \ .\ / /a7
29 32 46 45 1 1 ^Y=NP
1 —...- I I -- 41 /, 12 a
33
28
rz7_ 34 +y IxU
r
3S 36 I.37 11 3a F,j' / 5 `.�]� :7 a
26 �,\'' 14 f / z
fs: p
rj
17
`23
z2 2] 20 /r \ 19 } O FJLjj
� V
\ ANDALL STREET
J
Q
Z M
Z W
f 8
LLI W
Z 1E Z
a! I 1 !a
Z Z Z Z
W W Q
v N 0 W �
7P
\ v - z
\ \ >
LL
\ • W
r •
• 1
; I I
oeo li
\ Q O
\ • Z 4
\ -
\ : • � Z 0
r
o� U.
UJ
._ • • UJ \ li
1 V � J
1 c � °
• I • 11 �
• Z
• I •
• • � I 1 OOO
I I
1
• V O �
• • J
LL
O ,
W J
O a
= Q - a
I • • LV cn
FA \ Z a o
Z � J
1 •• M cn
Ln
•
M
REVISIONS
3
v
1. 09/14/2023 Revise layout.
5
2. 10/02/2023 Revise layout.
3. 10/13/2023 Revise layout. o
4. �
5.
5
I 6. �
, DRAWN BY: C#
ISSUE DATE: 08/28/2023
a
. • FILE NO: XXX
U
C
_YI N
w
Q �
N
O �
16
SITE DATA G
NOTES m
G�
TOTAL SITE AREA ±59.30 AC. 80' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (19-24, 36-38) 65' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (1-18,25-35,39-48) 50' VILLA LOTS (49-108) LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1) Field work completed 10/04/2023. v N
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 108 MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: z J N
80' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 9 FRONT 30 FT. FRONT 30 FT. FRONT 25 FT. The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 5, Township 31, 2) Title Work provided by: Old Republic National Title
65' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 39 SIDE 10 FT. SIDE 7.5 FT. SIDE 5 FT. Insurance Company dated August 22nd, 2023 at 7:00
Range 22, and the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast AM. Title file number 59590. 0 50 100 200
50' VILLA LOTS 60 SIDE CORNER 30 FT. SIDE CORNER 20 FT. SIDE CORNER 20 FT. Quarter Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka county, Minnesota.
REAR SETBACK 30 FT. REAR SETBACK 30 FT. REAR SETBACK 30 FT. 3) Wetlands delineated by: Kjolhaug Environmental M
ROAD LINEAR LENGTH 4,450 L.F. Services. Dated 09/15/2023. ( SCALE IN FEET ) 2
of
2 L
0
v
/ A
r
�U
� gsna
o '
- j r
���\
ji
.
wzz
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 7A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator
MEETING DATE: April 241h, 2024
REQUEST: Linda Avenue Addition Preliminary Plat
APPLICANT: James Christiansen
2 Blue Flag Court
North Oaks, MN 55127
OWNER: Same
INTRODUCTION
The applicant,James Christiansen, is proposing to subdivide the existing lot located at 6217
Hodgson Road into two (2) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single
family houses. The lot is 1.37 gross acres (59,796 sf).
The Land Use Application is for the following:
• Preliminary Plat
o 2lots
This staff report is based on the following information:
• Boundary&Topographic Survey with Resource Inventory prepared by Kurth Surveying,
Inc. dated April 9, 2024
• Boundary&Topographic Survey with Tree Inventory& Removals prepared by Kurth
Surveying, Inc. dated April 9, 2024
• Preliminary Plat prepared by Kurth Surveying, Inc. dated April 9, 2024
• Civil Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated April 9, 2024
• Landscape Plan prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. dated April 9, 2024
• Report of Geotechnical Exploration prepared by ITCO Allied Engineering Company dated
August 22, 2023
• Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company,
Inc. dated August 17, 2023
• WCA Notice of Decision dated October 23, 2023
1
ANALYSIS
General Site Characteristics
The proposed project includes dividing the 1.37 acres parcel into two single family residential
lots. The total impervious area will be 0.115 acres (11.1%), total pervious area 1.22 acres
(88.9%).
Land Cover
Pre-settlement land cover (Marschner) was oak openings and barrens, an oak-dominated
transitional area between deciduous forest and prairie.
Current land cover (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System) on the site includes 26-50%
impervious cover with coniferous trees.
The tree survey identified a mix of red pine, cedar, ash, elm, and oaks.
Rare, Unique,or Significant Resources
Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) has been observed within a one-mile radius of the site.
Highways, roads, and other development separate the project site from suitable habitat for this
species. Any sightings of this species, while unlikely, should be reported to City staff so that the
turtles can be safely relocated. Project-related impacts to this species are unlikely, and
additional protection measures are not required.
Forster's tern (Sterna forsteri) has been identified within a mile of the project site. This species
utilizes open water and marsh for feeding and breeding habitat. The project is not expected to
impact this species.
Soils
The Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey notes the following soil types on the
project site:
Soderville fine sand on 0-3 % slopes (98.8%). Also a hydrologic group A soil that is moderately
well drained and not hydric. Permeability is rapid to moderately rapid with negligible runoff.
Zimmerman fine sand on 2-6 %slopes (1.2%). This is a hydrologic group A soil that is excessively
drained, not hydric,with rapid permeability and negligible to low surface runoff.
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management will be reviewed by the City Engineer.
2
Stormwater Pollution Prevention
The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan calls for silt fence on the south/down-gradient
perimeter of both lots. A construction exit is shown for Lot 1. A construction exit must be
added for Lot 2 unless all construction traffic will be routed through the exit at Lot 1. Inlet
protections should be added to the up-gradient flared end sections on the west side of both
lots.
Flood Plain
Site does not fall within the flood management zone.
Shoreland District
Site does not fall within the Shoreland District.
Wetlands
There are no wetlands indicated on this site in the National Wetlands Inventory.
A 4,145 square foot wetland was delineated on the east perimeter abutting Hodgson Road. No
impacts are proposed to this wetland.
Greenway System, Parks and Trails
The site is not part of the Greenway System.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR)Considerations
The site is not within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary.
Drinking Water Protection
The site is not within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The site will be
connected to City sewer and water.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Boulevard Trees
Boulevard trees are required for all new residential subdivisions at a rate of one tree per lot
frontage.
Boulevard trees are shown on the landscape plan for both lots.
Boulevard tree requirements have been met.
3
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards
The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not
interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to
minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed
trees in areas where tree cover is most critical.
A tree survey was performed that identified:
Total Trees 45
Total Trees Removed 7
Total Trees Preserved 38
Mitigation Trees Required 0
The trees planned for removal are in the Basic Use Area and will not require mitigation trees to
be planted. An ash tree planned for removal is outside of the Basic Use Area but will not require
mitigation due to the prevalence of Emerald ash borer in the area. There are 7 other infested
ash trees that must be removed from the property as well.
The trees planned for preservation on the west perimeter must have Tree Protection Zones
installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. This is noted on the Grading,
Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1). The same note must be added to the
Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) in place of landscaping note#3.
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have been met.
Open Areas Landscape Standards
Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots.
Buffer and Screen Standards
The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads
and parking, and screen utility and loading areas.
A 6-foot buffer and screen will be required for the east perimeter abutting Hodgson Road. This
screen can be trees, shrubs, a fence, or some combination of these as described in City Code
Section 1007.049 (6)(b).
Buffer and screen standards have not been met.
Canopy Cover
Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development.
4
Foundation Landscaping
Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development.
Sod and Ground Cover Standards
All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a
minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be
provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or
wetlands.
Seed mix for ground cover must be specified on the Landscape Plan and Grading, Drainage, and
Erosion Control Plan.
Sod and Ground Cover Standards have not been met.
Lighting
The purpose of the lighting requirements in the Zoning Code is to reduce light pollution,
promote energy conservation, and increase night time safety, utility, security, and productivity.
Lighting is reviewed by the City Planner.
Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0 foot candle onto right of way or 0.4
foot candle onto adjacent property.
Per Section 1007.043(6)(f), in residential districts, any lighting used to illuminate a structure, an
off-street parking area, or other area shall be arranged as to deflect light away from any
adjoining residential property or from any public right-of-way.
While photometric plans aren't required for single residential houses, City Code requirements
still must be met.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Preliminary Plat for the Linda Avenue Addition be forwarded to the
Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following comments:
1. A 6-foot buffer and screen will be required for the east perimeter abutting Hodgson
Road. This screen can be trees, shrubs, a fence, or some combination of these as
described in City Code Section 1007.049 (6)(b).
2. Remove 7 additional Emerald ash borer infested trees from the site.
3. The trees planned for preservation on the west perimeter must have Tree Protection
Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. This is noted
on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1). The same note must
be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) in place of landscaping note#3.
5
4. The tree planting detail on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) shall include comments about
exposing root flare so it is visibly at grade to ensure trees are installed at proper depth,
and that mulch is pulled back 3 inches from the trunk(mulch is not left touching the
trunk).
5. Seed mix for ground cover must be specified on the Landscape Plan and Grading,
Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan.
6. A construction exit will be required for Lot 2 unless all construction access will be routed
through Lot 1.
7. Inlet protection will be needed for the up-gradient flared-end sections west of the two
driveways.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Preliminary Plat (Sheet S2)
2. Tree Inventory with Removals (Sheet S3)
3. Landscape Plan (Sheet L1)
4. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1)
6
PRELIMINARY PLAT of LINDA AVENUE ADDITION
33 50
OWNER. PROJECT ENGINEER.
MLOWEEd ABuYBez leh,P.E.
Zoned RI I Zoned RI 2 BLUECFLAG COURT PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC.
PID 31-31-22-13-0021 ' PID 31-31-22-14-0053 NORTH OAKS,WIN 55127 6716 LAKE DRIVE
CIRCLE PINES,MN.550t4
1 SURVEYOR: 16511 361-8237(Dirleot)
fiP.
y RANDY SL.URVEYING,
KURTH
U {�'I �•I KURTH SURVEYING, INC.
•'� \ � 1 99 r 4002 JEFFERSON 5T.NE.
.(--��,5 I- IIy ,fix COLUMBIA HEIGHTS,MN.55421
m L I NDA AVGIVL m"" {(A(t R y} m1 CURRENT ON NO.R-1 IRESI ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT\WETLANDS:
-- _._ _yn _; t - - i
KJ
EW
. - -,•���- �� 0 YIN.BUILDING SETBACKS, 61o5 WILD ROSE LAN AL SERVICES COMPANY
_`. 40 E — L I NDA FrsB 30' N.iu3 a
N¢Q 45. 249;A1
T [ - AVENUE COR.-40' 95 1 4oI a757 ct1
� a.�"- ml _ YE ,:I � amxl_erpp;pl Q? SYSB=10'HSE 5'ACC
SHOREWOOD.
-n�-w 2
x ay'a'RPs ,m•m ICI.-•-_I^T- —�—, �� C'T . ` RYSB=30'HSE-5'ACC
,e__�Ty132+_ SITE AREA BREAKDOWN
TT
NORTX LINE.BLOCK 2 mv.� f— s R -- I� a'�ly ~R -I•,}r� ]1 1 Y YIN.LOT WIDTH: TOTAL BOUNDARY 59,795'So.FT.
R �I SIB} S SI A TOTA L WE LAND 41 5•SO.
60' INTERIOR; 100'CORNER(RI) LOT WETLAND 620•SOFT.
---i�-- - 17'ROAR/W = 4,065x SO.FT
I $ mt ly I£ 1 YIN LOT DEPTX, TOTAL LOTSD =55.730=SO.FT.
135' fRtl
\ i• 1111 Q.Lj� IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NOT OT EXCEED 35%
t� ;Zoned 22 04 I I I PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
PID 31 31-22-42-0e I I s%°a"901'6 0 wyoo.I f t I t :1�. �� TO BE 10 ALONG ROAD LINES AND 5 FEET ALONG
L 1 f INTERIOR LOTS LINES ARE SHOWN TINS UNLESS
I. I
oI I
•. 4Q �.NET 1 I ESIfI a 1 i , � ' � NOTED ON THE PLAT:
1. —1 O `
ApSt 11 i�l' �✓.: O 2 I\ z 1
sD.rT`.TOTu. I _
I 1 E I
F-------
m 1 IIXLuoEs;3•evin ,.Ian t
1 - Zoned RI I
m ' 1 (- PID 31-31-22-14-0007 i I
e ; EE
i ® =SANITARY MANHOLE �5 SI
0 N POWER POLE I I
j Z - B LF C KBUILDING WALL
.._..• _
('
' �,+k, I 6 vl-ml.l • B v"mo.y O �. ! x OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
:—
I .BURIED COMMUNICATION
GASSERVIC
=WATER SERVICE\MICE\YAW
isWIM LINE OF uwnm[TROY ACY9m1 +�•PBOP09EDD \ pg 3 —'STORY SEWER 4 FLOW DIRECTION
jAlai SIUIR LINE OF SW 1/4.NEI/4 �4 mA]]=AOE a dfAIH�Yd MID �i i 1 - "rpBBlf 1/4
BT:c.31,T.;I,R.z; IUiILITY FARIIBNT a 35 U _/•(ASEyEM' - ITY EA9EIBBNT gyp , g1�}6j�,6 Razz, =SANITARY SEWER 8 FLOW DIRECTION
1 133 �— °L ""`"'11
CONTOUR LINE-1'INTERVAL
- .,, �-
9� --- - SPOT ELEVATION
-S 89 40 27-W 250.37 :w:A -ITA y .EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
'- Atn=IDRTM LINE „ AS REVISED AND APPROVED 10-23-23 BY YNBWSR
NORTH LII�OF ROIAVICIAOO9
of Txr N4v4, /,,sLx.;t,T•�I.a.xz 35 U.P.A.
EAS
3 j' Zoned RDECIDUOUS TREE-WO=WHITE OAK;RO=RED OAK
PID 31-31-22-41-00007 J^., YPL-MAP POP-POPLAR
Zoned Rl •L O I `t1A••\ _1� ----- —C> =EVERGREEN TREE-RP-RFD PINE,CED=CEDAR
1
PID 31 31 22-42-o0M rCO 1
1 i 7 , `.Y i .%1 C O A , /✓ i 1 ].. =BLACKTOP AREA
/ A $
CONCRETE AREA
PID,31-31-22-42-0002 �:•' "';
�``�•.\\....... NOTES
BURIED UTILITIES SHOWN AS FLAGGED ON SITE. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
NO GOPHER STATE ONE CALL REQUEST WAS MADE
FOR THIS SURVEY. That Pat f Lot.1 and 2,Block 2.
ARTHU E.THOM ACRES,Anoka Countyy,Yl nneaota,
WATER AND SEWER SERVICES AS SHOWN FROM lyInV east of she weat 190 feet ihareof.
CITY AS BUILT PLANS
BENCHMARK USED WAS AS SHOWN ON THE AS BUILT CERTIFICATION
PLANS,BEING THE TIN AT THE NW CORNER OF THIS SITE
0 30 6 0 1 2 0 v HEREBY OERT I FY THAT THIS Sl1RVEY PLAN OR REPORT
FOR THIS Sl1RVE3Y3..THE SOUTH LINE OF THE AS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER DIIkEtt SUPER s O4
KURTH SURVEYING, I NC. ASSIGNED ANCASSUYED�EARING2OF S 89 HAS E40'27^W E v oCENSE L ND 9URVErO ND R
4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. SCALE I 1 INCH = 30 FEET '7
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 _11.J.11lurFn�•i:i:S NeR02
PHONE: (783)788-9769 0 IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED 20270 usren` 4
E-MAIL:kaiOkurtheurveyinginc.com •_'RON MONUMENT FOUND ,4-9-z4(:.�i 1—�dw)
RI= 3 REBAR SET ON LINE
BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR: JAMES CHRISTIANSEN
TREE INVENTORY & REMOVALS
33 50
RP GOOD x
••� �' I.-.- I. w 113 mE00Dao x
I
., ELN 8
lag 9 10 GOOD
I6. V 12 1A.R
IN
A9w1 18 PAIR X
m L I NDA AVEN � <vt=a w; LINDAIs € m
— 15O f8 11 CLOD
.................................... I6s RP 12 GOOD
—.—. GOOD
g;... ——— I RP 1s GOOD
,x
N 9A 4540 E a49:g1 }ae
'..:'..:'.. '... a Y isv i i
._._..-.».fly- _c? ` GOOD
AVENUE8 4 O
le f8 le GOOD
1.14
yII�. `-fwf.'?ti.,xs f>_; 18� w 8 GOOD
NORTH LINE.eLOIX 1E F$It�.mO 15A b-w v 1 Ya Q;:i .._ lea rs la GOOD
R w w�p RP _
§ 2D 1.
RG U2
2 _ _
2 B 12 GOOD
4� ba Y y I 2J2 'e
\� tie C GOOD
'2 L
OOD
i
FL' F- $' zva C , GOOD
cce,l I'' m za cm a woo
dr" V '
Y 1' roTnL ciLiP�R r�ivtu.lzs•
I
SANITARY MANHOLE
Y1 pO -POWER POLE
BUILDING WALL
x OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
O II BURIED COMMUNICATION
Q -GAS SERVICE\MAIN
��� 1 `', c �w^ a•Aa� � .WATER SERVICE\YAW
, BUCKTHORN ! y i1�
-SOUTH LUTE OF ARxnm[THOM ACRES �9Ot AND BRUSH STORY SEWER 8 FLOW DIRECTION
t —SOUTH LINE OF 9W 1/H.NE1/4 gem �m'� I y YBE
SEC.31,7.31,R.23 e.sa nl u,Pe'A•2VSEMFJ•O �*^;law -� qo I .Aer aiA tc�i:L R_22,' .SANITARY SEWER d FLOW DIRECTION
1 -""" aN,,a�r5 - �.- _- - CONTOUR LINE-1'INTERVAL
.... -epiT _
SPOT ELEVATION
89 40 27"W 250 37-- -•T --- - {gyp>�' �I�I -- —a • .— OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
+-NORTH LIME OF ROHAVIC\ACRES AND NORTH LINE k - - [ EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND BY KJ VIR
OF 1XE uiliN,SF,1/4,�C.1r,T.;rJ,R.22 „, AS REVISED AND APPROVED 10-23-23 BY YNBWSR
3
5'U.P.A. EASEMEN[` I
yA
!IP i� -DECIDUOUS TREE,ID NO 8 512E-WO-WHITE OAK;RO-RED OAK
YPL-MAPLE:POP-P-POPLAR
L 0 1 1 EVERGREEN TREE,ID NO d SIZE-RP-RED PINE.CED=CEDAR
-�
I
' tt� i I —0 =TREE TO BE REMOVED
,``G•,\\.......'`i I L: NOTES
BURIED UTILITIES SHOWN AS FLAGGED ON SITE. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
NO GOPHER STATE ONE CALL REWEST WAS MADE
FOR THIS SURVEY. Thet pet f Lot.1 and 2,Block 2,
ARTHU E.THOM ACRES,Anoke Countyy,Minneeo ta,
WATER AND SEWER SERVICES AS SHOWN FROM lyInV east of she weal 190 feet ihareo1.
CITY AS BUILT PLANS
BENCHMARK USED WAS AS SHOWN ON THE AS BUILT CERTIFICATION
PLANS,BEING THE TNH AT THE NW CORNER OF THIS SITE
D 3 D 6 O 120 v HEREly CERTIFY THAT THIS Sl1RVEY PLAN OR REPOHT
FOR THIS Sl1RVE3Y3..THE SOUTH LINE OF THE AS PREPARED BY HE OR UNDER DIIkEtt SUPERvl31 qV
KURTH SURVEYING, I NC ASSIGNED ANCASSUYED�EARING20F S 89E40'27^W Lv OCENSE L ND 9GRVErOR UNDER
T OF HE AT F TA.
4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 65421 w::li'.i lix� i:i:S.ft°iFIU
PHONE: (763)788-9769 0-IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED 20270 Osta,Aprll 9,2024
E-MAIL:kelOkurtheurveyinglne.com •_'RON MONUMENT FOUND
gI= 3 REBAR SET ON LINE
D OA D,M,A,
LANDSCAPING NOTES °^
eRlel�,l�„e
JUNE e.2023
i� 1. STAKE AND/OR MARK ALL PLAN PLANTING LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
OWNER TO APPROVE ALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
_...............—_ L I N D A AVENUE — —_..........-_..-aa,....._o —_..............—..............
--.. o--.... '. 2. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE"AMERICAN
._,,,,,,,,,,.._—................_.__.................. ����� U STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK",AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN,
aH� m I LATESTEDITION RE� .
eo�in.] 3. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL
ea.aa T _ CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WITH APPROVED TREE PROTECTION FENCING.
4. WHEN STAKING OR GUYING OF TREES IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL OCCUR SO AS NOT
TO CREATE ANY HAZARDS UNSIGHTLY OBSTACLES.ALL WIRES SHALL BE
I I—I—I I—I—I I II I II II II II I I—I—I- ENCASED IN HOSE TO PREVENT
BE
TREE DAMAGE.
BENCHMARK 5. ALL PLANTS INSTALLED SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND IDENTIFIED AS HARDY
TOP NUT HrD PLANTS WHICH ARE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL SEASONAL CONDITIONS. -
0
904.43(1929) u
.-_ : .. �9b 42 WIDE..TCH 'gp'�'
-9Q "_m--` ' """"' a.„ -1c 6. ALL PLANTS MUST BE SOUND,HEALTHY,VIGOROUS,AND FREE OF DISEASE, E
...- ........ it
INSECTS EGGS AND LARVAE.
7. WHERE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED,SAID SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE WATE
_ 127RO SENSOR DEVICES TO AVOID OVERWATERING AND TIMING DEVICES TO ENSURE _
RP_^ R IRRIGATION IS CONDUCTED DURING THE HOURS PERMITTED BY THE CITY WATER
R -
....., ------ - -- - -------
P ^ g l I I 17"0 1 1 O7 RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS.
51 g� 0 6 1 10H0; a 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND KEPT
I I 15 51 I NEAT,CLEAN,AND UNCLUTTERED,AND WHERE LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED AS
II I I ^� ^ I I t I PART OF CITY APPROVALS,ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH IS DISEASED OR DIES
PROPOSED I SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LIKE KIND OF THE ORIGINAL SIZE BY THE PROPERTY
I'\ 903'B I 90:B j OWNER. NO LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE USED FOR THE PARKING OF VEHICLES OR
I I I BOULEVARD = O FOR THE STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF MATERIALS,SUPPLIES,OR MERCHANDISE
II I I CII„ AMERICAN N UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY.
\ F.B. LINDEN(TYP.) I i j 8.1, REPLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPE MATERIALS,PLANTINGS AND SCREENING
Q I I TTTT I m }I SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL DESIGN OR AS APPROVED BY
Q 6• LOW FL=�98.9 I I W FL=895.) I I ( I CCfY'
\9' / I I I I 1 = 8.2. ALL REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 45 DAYS OF WRITTEN
PO
0BHa �I 1 I NOTiFICATiON FROM THE CITY. bigIt P9P 06-901.6 ; o e900
I 1 iIY PL 8.3. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREE AND PLANT GROWTH AND MAINTENANCE
SHALL REST UPON THE PROPERTY OWNER. `
903.E 9, APPLY CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS PRIOR TO ANY o
r INSTALLATION.
/ I I - I I Z 10.ALL WORK TO BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT TIME OF
,IYRq • I I' : Q I S I ( 1 ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER.CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS IN A TIMELY
�13rR yua I I I• i g0`' `l MANNER.
_
m a E
2"1P'!L b I Oy 1QD
1"RPI I/ j' _ - --.- r I z :.,..., ..m.:.o..:,a. 2 _
r l E I s 12 6 iV
{ I I v` I;i ��.m.
I I a ALL DISTURBED o�"� Q � � � f'�a���
t I I 0 a 4soo.z I'' PREPARED FOR:
I2 P 0e�so>..1 I I I APPRVX. I AREAS TO BE y (n ems.aw,�... JIM
\\ I 12' H ig I GRADING SEEDED 5 III CHRISTIANSEN
0ECI000US1UEEPIRNIINUDETAIL
\\\ 11"A I6 LM ASH�8" f�'k I I i I
Hwy, + T { t {
B'A 4' 8'ASH 15 5 i 5 ASH B•ASN 14•RP 3•RP 9"RP 11'RP 17'RP
12' a 10"RP
1 15 RP
-991- • 35'P ED BUCKTHO N AND pRopoSED BRUSH lDo, SITE-SPECIFIC snEPaNNn�
fiptQRRqqgg NOTES
9 OEDRAINA'P",ND 35 U.P.A. EAS MENT AGE
1�11 n. �M ....-.12-- pp T-- 1. ONE BOULEVARD TREE IS PROPOSED FOR LOT.12 pLOWE
..............90085 CE015 B Cm 9'ED/g'1 6 CEO gg3 ..05
0
- �..cE6 —�'� —' —* — a. a �— ENGINEERING,INC.
« .... ...
-. —_.. -........eyr .... .._ .— ....
O ...... ....... ...... .... ... ....... ........ ..... __...
-�' O 95 d i WIDE OPEN DITCH
w V Es Mess
--- - ".� DECIDUOUS TRE
ES
EES
\ �.9� �\` ON. SYMB. SO CO
CALONAMES SIZE ROOT NORTH
°' I ! / ._, •�........--"' 35' U.P.A. EASEMENT'--,., -"Ii
2 �, LINDEN/BASSWOOD 2.5" BB
.. Tilia a-rica 'Boule-d'
LEGEND
Exrsn„c TREEro REn D
____ RRD�REDRDRD�„EERD R,D„�„� LANDSCAPE PLAN L'
LINDA AVENUE ADDITION
" L DRIVEWAY - -
CO TS�N ACCORDANCE TO CITY 9 im ev
M pMA,
cHc PRa xa
Sr RDS( ) i M pA 23-2999
AVENUE (66 R/W> __ �, _ _ a M NLLR
NJ _-.. -. ____.
N
ROCK -- JUNE a 2023
CONSTRUCTION
RAncE N 89°45'40"E 249.41 -----_ P.
<�—
h�'^A ro I aW I I I I I I � I 1IIII-
ro
._....... ......_... HyCs .- I .. --
_gam....-
- � � _.._ _......._ ....... a 9. -� 1 .....899 ....
........ .I. .._. .... 89b
"N 89'45'43'E 190.00m � _
I
- FES 699.35 2 - '•� FES 899.30 0 BID R L
ES 69R 9 R
SEDIMENT LDGS
(STAKED ,7o °'
FES 899.]0 IN PLACE? TYP. $ O
15 51 S� ,..
9 V
II I I I 1 o
I, 0 I I 903,8 I I I X'
I z
F.B. .;'F.B. 11 'I on '
Q N h 8'a LOW FL $95.9 LOW FL=895.7 °
It 9P 091901.E T *B`H`900.Z h L b I EA9 ry
,I$ T
.I e\�5H 903 8 ' I 903.E I '^ I•:p Pe
e y$
• 12.I i � I i I°' ,m " a �sED
lo
q s J
II aaa
PROP.
FENCE N - n
AD
= r1 I -
N
0
o Q t O
Oo
c�
I�I
2-1° I 11 I !n L1
II� L:
Z _
UNST"EoiH nc�oaoniicE 11 ° i VP i 0 I a 3 _
6- o
WITH CITY TREE PROTECTION 1g e6H-900.2 i =
C u
AP 0 ri 9D1.1 FENCE DETAIL 11 7 APPROX. ,'rj I'. (J-) e
zp
12'ASH Ili GRADING ' 07 r
11'A �$II
I6 8 ASH LIMITS III d I PREPARED FOR O
I 1 (�j 8'ASH 5 ASH 6-ASH 1 O JIM
\\� 12' RPW 4 a'i551 tRP 3.RP s"RP 11'RP I] �10 I CHRISTIANSEN
n'RP
I4 R
..
sal . rip �` AND.... pRoposeD BRUSH a
t1- 35 PA1G ED BUCKTHORN CKTNO N I
"`.., scEpRAw AND �,35' U.P.A. EASEMENT __ e--
SY. SEMM .... ...7ql F(���AA T 5
...... l2-CEo '10�CE1]
- B00 CED158'CER 6'CEO 9"CEal� B"CED
_. -a 899 ax aye rxE wE wE o-¢. we w[... o-a-
1
..... 899 .::. -
900 s�K;�R7o
--- PLOWE
ENGINEERING,INC.
DRAINAGE
T Tv
(RE ER O PRE1 M.PTAT)
2 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION:
LOT NO. LINE roaNATIVE PLANTINGS MUST
PROPERTY xe(as 1ae solo
SITE AREA =59,796 SF(1.373 ACRES) FOLLOW THE CITV'S rvAmE u:(ss11ae1sml
z SURFACE DRAINAGE I I PUVfT ESTABLISHMENT
DICATE5 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS IN THE CITY
FINISHED GRADE LOWEST FLOOR ELEV. STANDARD SPKIFICATIONS. NOFITF'I
a AT REAR OF HOUSE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA =5,000 SF(0.115 ACRES)
s RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPE: .0 1 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY =1,657 SF(0.038 ACRES) 1
PL=95Oz CADRACE COURSESTES (WITHIN PROPERTY LINE) 1
F.B. FULL ASEMEM mmvEwEo�Fle au..�a Know what's below.
TOTALIMPERVIOUSAREA =6,657SF (0.153ACRES) (11.1%) ropmERSEE�µo".R.w�o.. Call before you dig.
PROPOSED ELEVATION
oapBnpx AT Ora 1 TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA =53,139SF(1.220 ACRES) (88.9%)
FRDN)
z 'AT SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING&EROSION CONTROL NOTES
L GORE LUGGESTEDGAMGE
5 �- ---- D= IDN LAND DISTURBANCE AREA =33,448SF(0.788ACRE5) GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1
TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT LINDA AVENUE ADDITION .1