The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-07-24 - Council Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, October 7, 2024 No Public Comment allowed at Work Sessions per the Rules of Decorum COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (not televised) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 3. Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) Presentation 4. Slater Addition Preliminary Plat, Katie Larsen 5. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Home Occupation Permits, Katie Larsen 6. Natures Refuge North Revised PUD Concept Plan, Katie Larsen 7. Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan, Katie Larsen 8. Imagine 2050 Regional Plan Comments, Michael Grochala 9. Notices and Communications, City Council 10. Closed Session in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c) (3), Discuss Offer for Proposed Land Purchase, 7473 24th Avenue (Winter Property), Michael Grochala ADJOURNMENT 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Sarah Cotton, City Administrator WORK SESSION DATE: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) Presentation ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND At the August 26th City Council meeting, members of the Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) participated in Public Comment, sharing information about their group. They asked the Council to invite them back to discuss the information they highlighted further at a future work session. Mayor Rafferty requested that the City Administrator schedule time at a future work session to further discuss the topic. The Council did not object. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None ATTACHMENTS ACEIT PowerPoint Presentation and Background Information Achieving Locally-Controlled Elections in Anoka County Presented by Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) To City of Lino Lakes October 7,2024 More than 20 highly dedicated individuals meeting weekly since August 2022; researching and identifying non- partisan election reform strategies for Anoka County PRESENTERS PROFILES •Derek Lind—Ramsey, financial analyst •Brenda Miller—Columbus, election judge, occ. Therapist, homeschooler •Paul Berndt—Coon Rapids, Manufacturing engineering •Joe Richardson—Andover, election judge, power/energy industry •Lori Mahowald—Coon Rapids,election judge,operations/project mgmt. Other Contributors •Scott Coggins—Andover, election judge, IT & eLearning, business owner •Troy Cooper—Ramsey, financial services IT mgt. & small business owner •Jeannie Erickson—Coon Rapids, election judge, 30 yrs. Admin assistant • Lisa Henrickson—Linwood Twp.,election judge,37 yrs.state of MN • Gary Kemmetmueller—Coon Rapids,electronics technology • Robert Kirchner—Coon Rapids, 40 yrs., local gov’t admin. • Richard Klabechek—Oak Grove, applied math/manufacturing engineer • Jonathan Liebsch—Ham Lake,election judge,software developer • Sue Peterson—Ham Lake,election judge • Channing Stowell—East Bethel,M.I.T.Sloan School trained data scientist • Davin Tormanen—Vadnais Heights, 25 yrs. electronics technology •Pam Weber—Andover, election judge, physical therapist 2 3 Seven 4 •Election Judges do an excellent job counting ballots. •Elections are complex and outsourced •>60%of voters no longer trust our elections •Transparency issue on actual votes Solutions •Apply existing laws •Focus on what can be done now •Exercise local control Introduction We need to return to a simple,locally controlled and transparent process The purpose of elections is to accurately measure the will of the people 104 5 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOALS 1.Small Voting Precincts 2.Secured Election Judge Data 3.Verified Registered Voters 4.Validated Paper Ballots 5.Paper Poll Books 6.Hand-Counted Paper Ballots ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #1 •Through Local Management Small Voting Precincts 6 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 LINO LAKES, REGISTERED VOTERS PER PRECINCT, 2010-2022 Precint 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 MN SOS Suggested Maximum of 2,000 Registered Voters Per Precinct Note: May be time to add 2 more precincts and rebalance 7 Since 2012 multiple precincts have exceeded Minnesota SOS guidance 8 9 Summary | Recommendations •Cities are authorized to determine precinct size •Precincts with <2,000 registered voters are more manageable ADOPT A RESOLUTION to limit voting districts to 2,000 registered voters or less 10 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #2 •Through Local Management & Storage Secured Election Judge Data Outsourcing =Sharing =Loss of Control Unlimited Risk •Data shared with Modus/InTech,an NGO (Non- Governmental Organization),and cannot be FOIA’d •Data transferred electronically (online)to others is hackable •Data shared/stored in the Cloud and/or on others’PCs or on devices is hackable •Encryption doesn’t eliminate risk;it is hacked every day •3rd Party/Contractors that transfer data know the data is hackable and,thus,infuse language in their contracts that hold them harmless because they know this truth •Data sent/shared cannot be controlled and therefore poses a security threat to the Election Judge Data Security Risks in Outsourcing Inhouse on Local PC Zero to Limited Risk •Save/store file(s)only on a dedicated local PC,not in the AC files in the Cloud 11 12 Summary | Recommendations •There are data security risks in outsourcing •Government has an obligation to protect personal information •Many questions with InTech contract •Good News: Internal management is a viable solution ADOPT A RESOLUTION requesting Anoka County secure election judge personal data by ending the contract with InTech Software Solutions, Inc. and returning to local management and storage 13 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #3 Verified Registered Voters •Through Local Management ACEIT is working with Anoka County Elections to clean up voter rolls by removing voters who have moved out of their precinct Situation •SVRS data is periodically provided to the counties by the SOS •The County Auditor MUST (MS 201.091) update the “Master List” to keep the voter rolls accurate Problem •Duplicate and outdated records in the SVRS •These have the potential to be used by nefarious actors ACEIT Support •ACEIT identified free software to update the Master List – submitting more than 1,800 possible duplicate voter registrations in Anoka County to the A.C. Elections Director •The Anoka County Elections Department sent out 969 Postal Verification Cards of which 263 were returned and the registrations inactivated. 263 duplicate and outdated records in the current SVRS Solution •Our Anoka County Elections Department needs to clean the voter rolls on a regular basis so that people do not appear on the rolls who are not eligible with the address listed 14 Statewide Voter Registration System 15 Summary | Recommendations •County cooperation was excellent, but citizen advocates should not need to do this •The County should fund and use a high-end filter of its own to maintain an accurate Master List as required by Statute 201.091 •Municipalities should insist County maintain accurate Master List ADOPT A RESOLUTION requesting Anoka County fund and execute a high-end filter to maintain an accurate Master List of Voters as required by MN Statute 201.091 16 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #4 •Through Local Management Validated Paper Ballots 17 §Subdivision 1.Generally. The full-time clerk of any city or town shall administer the provisions of sections 203B.04 to 203B.15 and 203B.30 if: (1)the county auditor of that county has designated the clerk to administer them; or (2)the clerk has given the county auditor of that county notice of intention to administer them Municipalities Can Administer Absentee BallotsIncluding Mail-In Ballots MN Statute 203B.05 DESIGNATION OF MUNICIPAL CLERKS TO ADMINISTER ABSENTEE VOTING LAWS 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 CITY OF LINO LAKES, TOTAL NUMBER OF BALLOTS, IN-PERSON ABSENTEE, 2010-2022 In-Person ABMB Linear (ABMB) Note: Trend lines show that Early Voting is growing in proportion to total ballots cast since 2010 Ballots Cast Election Day Early Voting 18 19 Summary | Recommendations •Absentee mail-in ballots have a greater risk of fraud •Counterfeit resistant ballots are available and should be used •The proportion of absentee mail-in ballots is growing •Cities should administer all absentee ballots including mail-in ballots •MN 2022 Absentee Voting Administration Guide ADOPT A RESOLUTION to administer absentee mail-in ballots solely at the city ADOPT A RESOLUTION to create a city Ballot Board to administer mail-in ballots 20 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #5 Paper Poll Books •Through Local Management 28 Counties do not use ePollbooks 16 Counties use in some precincts 45 Counties use in all precincts The use of electronic ePollbooks is optional in Minnesota Counties and Municipalities 21 Online Security Risk Points in Poll Pads Paper •None Electronic •KNOWiNK/BPro/ePulse Cloud INTEGRATED data management •129 Verizon SA2100 hot spot devices •5 Cisco Meraki MR42 routers •22 iSync Cloud drives •Anoka County’s data on Amazon Aurora in Amazon’s GovCloud 22 You Have a Choice 201.225 ELECTRONIC ROSTER AUTHORIZATION. Subdivision 1.Authority. A county,municipality,or school district may use electronic rosters for any election.In a county,municipality, or school district that uses electronic rosters,the head elections official may designate that some or all of the precincts use electronic rosters.An electronic roster must comply with all of the requirements of this section.An electronic roster must include information required in section 201.221,subdivision 3,and any rules adopted pursuant to that section. … Subd.5.Election day. (a)Precincts may use electronic rosters for election day registration,to process preregistered voters,or both. The printed election day registration applications must be reviewed when electronic records are processed in the statewide voter registration system.The election judges shall determine the number of ballots to be counted by counting the number of original voter signature certificates or the number of voter receipts. (b)Each precinct using electronic rosters shall have a paper backup system approved by the secretary of state present at the polling place to use in the event that the election judges are unable to use the electronic roster. 23Source: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/201.225 24 Paper Works! •All of Anoka County precincts used paper poll books until 2018 •Nearby Isanti County still uses paper poll books in 17 of 19 precincts. In fact 29 (1/3rd of)MN counties still use paper poll books today •MN Statute 201.225 Subdivision 5.b.mandates paper poll books at every precinct for every election •They must be available as backup •They are printed before the election for every precinct •Each precinct maintains their copy onsite on election day Paper is More Cost-Effective Paper •Paper and ink (Same as today –as required in MN Statute 201.225) Electronic •Original capital,license,maintenance cost in 2018 •Average annual expenses $602,033 $69,930 •Software license,maintenance fees •Software connectivity license •Verizon Wireless Data Plan (hotspots) $63,125/yr. $1,000/yr. $3870-$7740/yr. •$3,870 in odd years •$7,740 in even years •Total Anoka County cost for 2018-2023 $1,029,353 •NOTE:Need for capital upgrade between 2024-2026 $218,413 Sources:KNOWiNK contract,2018;Property Records &Taxation Committee,July 19,2022 25 26 Summary | Recommendations •Electronic poll pads are not worth the risk •Returning to using ONLY paper poll books is the safe way to check voters in •Paper works and it is cheaper •Many precincts in Minnesota use paper ONLY ADOPT A RESOLUTION to return to paper poll books 27 ELECTION INTEGRITY GOAL #6 Hand-Counted Paper Ballots •Through Local Management •Via Post-Election Review Black Box Voting Keeps Getting Darker in Minnesota 2023 Law Changes Vote tabulation machines mandated if used before in Federal/State elections (MS 206.58) Cast Vote Records rendered useless for audit (MS 206.845) (This federally prescribed auditing tool built into tabulators can not be used to audit elections) 2024 Law Changes Hand counting at the polls rendered impossible (MS 204C.20) No residential address needed to register and vote (MS 201.071) Voting stations at Colleges & Universities authorized (MS 203B.081) Trust Machines Do Not Audit Do Not Hand Count Votes MINNESOTA LAWS = HIDDEN ELECTIONS 28 WHY HAND COUNT?—HIDDEN •Counting of votes is now hidden •Outsourced to NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) •Commercialized—controlled by private companies •Proprietary—electronic source codes hidden •Private—not subject to Freedom of Information requests •Cast Vote Records (the intended audit for tabulators) •MN counties refused to release them (before 2023) •Legislatively deemed non-public by MN law (as of 2023) 29 Most Contests are NEVER VERIFIED/Audited Audited with PER General Election US President US Senate US House Governor Not Regularly Audited Presidential Primary State Primary - many state & local offices General Election - many offices, including: Attorney General Secretary of State State Auditor State Senator State Representative County - commissioner, attorney, sheriff Municipal - mayor, council, town supervisors School Board Ballot Questions Post-Election Review (PER) (MS 206.89) FOR MOST OFFICES—NO AUDITS FOR DECADES 30 Minimum Four Precincts by lot for the county Optional if approved by County Canvassing Board, all races by lot The General Election PER Audit is TOO SMALL •Only two or three of 35-40 offices/races •Only 4 of 128 precincts in Anoka County But it can be increased •# offices/races •# precincts PER uses Hand counts PER Sample Sample No Sample Mandatory PER—SAMPLE TOO SMALL 31< 0.3% sample A FEASIBLE STRATEGY •Use tabulators as mandated by State law •Conduct Expanded Post-Election Review (PER) •Hand count votes only for competitive offices •The time and cost can be calculated 32 (An Excel spreadsheet calculator is provided) CITY OF LINO LAKES HAND COUNT DATA BY PRECINCT Offices # Counts Notes US President, Senate, House 3 Always contested MN Representative 1 Always contested County Board 0 Up in 2026 Mayor 0 Up in 2025 Council (2 at-large) 0 Up in 2025 (count for each candidate) School Board 0 ISD#12, #831, #624; add 6 optional SWCD 0 Not Contested Constitutional Ballot Question 0 Always contested; add one optional Judicial (Supreme, Appeals, District) 0 Usually not contested; add 4 optional Total Offices/Hand Counts 4 Ballots Per Precinct 1,930 Actual 2020 average Hours to Count 13 Based upon 6 seconds per vote Number Hours (2-person teams) 26 Runtime (2 hours = 12 judges; 4 hours = 6 judges) Pay Rate $15.50 Average: EJ = $15; Head Judge = $17 Cost Per Precinct $399 ($1,496 if options added)33 Resolution to request ___ of ___ precincts in City of Lino Lakes be drawn for inclusion in the Post-Election Review (PER) 34 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Local Control through Local Actions 35 City Council votes 5-0 to hand count all four precincts and all competitive offices in November Election under Post-Election Review (PER) April 29, 2024 36 Ramsey City Council voted 7-0 to hand count 2/3 of their 9 precincts under Post-Election Review (PER) for the 2024 General Election. This will include all offices with more than one candidate, with the exception of judicial offices. City of Ramsey seeks to hand count votes during the 2024 Post-Election Review 37 City of Ham Lake seeks to hand count votes during 2024 Post-Election Review The Council voted 5-0 to hand count one of six precincts and all competitive offices, except judicial, after the November election 38 City of East Bethel requests expanded Post-Election Review On September 9, 2024 the East Bethel City Council voted 4-1 to request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board include one of the City’s three precincts in the Post- Election Review and include all competitive offices with a vote margin of 20% or less, but excluding judicial offices. 39 Linwood Township requests expanded Post-Election Review On September 10, 2024 the Linwood Township Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to request that their two precincts be included in the Post-Election Review (PER) for the 2024 General Election. In addition they voted for all competitive offices down the ballot to be included in the hand count. 40 On September 16, 2024 the Anoka City Council voted 3-2 to request that two of their eight precincts be included in the Post-Election Review (PER) in the 2024 General Election including most competitive offices and two ballot questions. They also voted 5-0 to maintain voting precincts below 2,000 registered voters. City of Anoka requests expanded Post-Election Review 41 City of Columbus requests inclusion in the Post-Election Review To Hand Count Votes in 2024 General Election On September 25 the Columbus City Council voted 3-0 to request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board include their voting precinct in the 2024 Post-Election Review. It would include all state, county, and city offices that include more than one candidate, except judicial races. 42 THANK YOU The Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT)thanksyouforthisopportunitytopresentinformationinsupportofsecure,transparent and locally-controlled elections. We stand ready to assist and support local officials inmakingdecisionstofurtherthesegoals. 43 Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) Email address: aceit@aceit.vote Website: www.projectminnesota.com/anoka/ anoka county election integrity team - Search Results | Facebook 44 1 WHY CONDUCT A POST-ELECTION REVIEW (PER)? Mission: To protect the votes of your citizens by checking the accuracy of the machine counts in order to enhance security and transparency and to build voter confidence. What your peers are saying: Weston Rolf, Mayor City of Oak Grove: “Nobody can confirm that the voting machine counted the ballots correctly on Election Day. It is important to me as your mayor that your vote counted.” Deb Musgrove, Ramsey City Council: "We value double checking everything in our society so why wouldn't we double check the counting of our votes." Others are saying: "We spend millions on our budget so we can afford a few thousand dollars to hand count our votes." What is PER? The post-election review (PER) is a manual recount (or “audit”) of the paper ballots of randomly-selected precincts for specific offices following each state general election. It compares the hand count with the results from the machines in order to determine accuracy within defined standards. The precincts and offices to be counted is determined by the County Canvassing Board which meets 3-8 days after the general election. The hand count takes place between 9 and 14 days after the general election (206.89). 2 Municipalities can request to add precincts & offices 1. Determine number of precincts and offices to hand count (see below) 2. Calculate time and cost(see calculator below) based upon: a. number of precincts and offices to be hand counted b. estimated or known number of ballots in each precinct c. hourly rate of pay to election judges if not waived 3. Adopt resolution to request inclusion in PER (see templates below) 4. Send resolution to county auditor or elections manager 5. Provide election judges to hand count 6. Cooperate with county during hand count 7. Pay election judges County can facilitate requests by expanding sample a. This request will be considered by County Canvassing Board. This board consists of five members: two county commissioners, the County Auditor, the County District Administrator, and Mayor of the largest city in the County). There is some flexibility in that each member can appoint a designee to appear for them and/or the County Auditor can appoint an eligible voter in the County to fill any vacancy. (MS 204C.31). b. The Canvassing Board must meet 3 to 8 days after the November 5, 2024 election, so between November 8-13. They make the decision about how many precincts are randomly drawn and how many offices are included (MS 204C.33 as amended in 2024). c. The Post-Election Review (PER) is held 9 to 14 days after the November 5, 2024 elections, so between November 14-19 (MS 206.89). d. Each municipality involved in the hand count provides election judges to conduct the count and pays them (MS 206.89, Subd. 9). e. The County elections department trains and supervises the hand count. f. The method of hand counting is the Piling System (MS 204C.21) and re- count protocols (204C.361). g. There are provisions in Statutes to deal with any deviants between the machine count on Election Day and the hand count under the PER (MS 206.89, Subd. 5). 3 Statutory Authority a. PER authorized & required: Sec. 206.89 MN Statutes i. Option to expand precincts (MS 206.89, Subd. 2) ii. Option to expand offices (MS 206.89, Subd. 3) b. Hand Count Method is Piling System: Sec. 204C.21 MN Statutes c. County Canvassing Board: Sec. 204C.31 MN Statutes d. PER Guide: 2022 Post-Election Review Guide (state.mn.us) e. Sample hand count time & cost calculation (see below) f. Sample resolutions: Oak Grove (4/29/2024) & Ramsey (6/11/2024) g. Sample resolution: City of Lino Lakes SEE LINO LAKES 2024 HAND COUNT CALCULATOR PER PRECINCT BELOW 4 Disclaimer: this estimate reflects an approximate cost for hand counting by election judges and does not include other potential administrative costs. (Upon request, ACEIT will provide this Excel spreadsheet on USB) 5 CITY OF OAK GROVE CITY OF RAMSEY 6 CITY OF OAK GROVE RESOLUTION RESOLUTION 24-055 REQUESTING 2024 GENERAL ELECTION POST-ELECTION REVIEW WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Oak Grove desires to have a Post-Election Review (PER) conducted on the results of all four of its precincts for the 2024 general election pursuant to Minnesota Statute 206.89; and WHEREAS, PER are conducted at precincts that must be chosen by lot by the Anoka County Canvassing Board, but there is not a limit on the number of lot selections that may be performed and there is not a restriction on establishing the lot from which the selection is made; and WHEREAS, a PER is required to include counting the votes for President or Governor, United States Senator, and United State Representative; and the county-appointed post-election review official may conduct a PER of votes cast for additional offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have a PER performed for all four of its precincts and to include all offices for which there is more than one candidate; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. In the event an Oak Grove election precinct is selected for a Post-Election Review (PER) of the 2024 general election, the City Council requests that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only the other three precincts in Oak Grove and select three additional precincts. 2. In the event an Oak Grove election precinct is not selected for a PER of the general election, the City Council request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only the four precincts in Oak Grove and select four precincts. 3. The City Council request that any PER of an Oak Grove precinct include all elections in which there are more than one candidate. Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of April 2024. _________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk (Seal) 7 CITY OF RAMSEY RESOLUTION Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #24-142 RESOLUTION REQUESTING GENERAL ELECTION POST-ELECTION REVIEW WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Ramsey desires to have a Post-Election Review (PER) conducted on the results of two-thirds of its precincts for general elections pursuant to Minnesota Statute 206.89; and WHEREAS, PER are conducted for precincts that must be chosen by lot by the Anoka County Canvassing Board, but there is not a limit on the number of lot selections that may be performed and there is not a restriction on establishing the lot from which the selection is made; and WHEREAS, a PER is required to include counting the votes for President or Governor, United States Senator, and United State Representative; and the county-appointed post-election review official may conduct a PER of votes cast for additional offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have a PER performed for two-thirds of its precincts and to include all offices for which there is more than one candidate but exclude all judicial offices. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. In the event a Ramsey election precinct is selected for a Post-Election Review (PER) of the general election, the City Council requests that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only the other precincts in Ramsey and select additional precincts to reach the threshold of two-thirds. 2. In the event a Ramsey election precinct is not selected for a PER of the general election, the City Council request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only Ramsey precincts and selects two-thirds of the precincts. 3. The City Council request that any PER of a Ramsey precinct include a review of the results of all state, county, and city offices, except judicial races, that include more than one candidate. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the 11 day of June, 2024. _____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk. 8 LINO LAKES SAMPLE RESOLUTION (To select ?? of 7 Precincts) RESOLUTION #_______ RESOLUTION REQUESTING GENERAL ELECTION POST-ELECTION REVIEW WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Lino Lakes desires to have a Post-Election Review (PER) conducted on the results of ___ its seven precincts for general elections pursuant to Minnesota Statute 206.89; and WHEREAS, PER are conducted for precincts that must be chosen by lot by the Anoka County Canvassing Board, but there is not a limit on the number of lot selections that may be performed and there is not a restriction on establishing the lot from which the selection is made; and WHEREAS, a PER is required to include counting the votes for President or Governor, United States Senator, and United State Representative; and the county-appointed post-election review official may conduct a PER of votes cast for additional offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have a PER performed for ___ of its seven precincts and to include all offices for which there is more than one candidate but exclude all judicial offices. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. In the event one Lino Lakes election precinct is selected for a Post-Election Review (PER) of the general election, the City Council requests that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only the other precincts in Lino Lakes and select ___ additional precinct(s). 2. In the event that no Lino Lakes election precincts are selected for a PER of the general election, the City Council request that the Anoka County Canvassing Board perform a second lot selection that includes only Lino Lakes precincts and select ___ of its seven precincts. 3. The City Council request that any PER of a Lino Lakes precinct include a review of the results of all state, county, and city offices, except judicial races, that include more than one candidate. Adopted by the City Council this ____ day of ______ 2024. _________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk (Seal) 9 LINO LAKES 2024 HAND COUNT CALCULATOR PER PRECINCT 1. Determine Number of Offices or Counts # Counts Office PLAN MAX On Ballot Contested or Not US President 1 1 1 Always contested US Senator 1 1 1 Always contested US Representative 1 1 1 Always contested MN Senator 0 0 0 None in 2024 MN Representative 1 1 1 Usually contested County Board 0 0 0 Up in 2026 Mayor 0 0 0 Up in 2025 Council (2)0 0 0 Up in 2025 or 2027 School Board 0 6 6 3 of 4, 4 of 8, 3 of 6 Soil & Water Conservation 0 0 1 Not contested Judicial (Supreme, Appeals, District)0 4 24 Usually not contested Constitutional Question 0 1 1 Always contested Total Number of Counts Per Ballot 4 15 36 *Lino Lakes is served by three school districts: Centennial ISD#12 (3 seats at large in even years; Forest Lake ISD#831 (3 or 4 seats at large in even years); White Bear Lake ISD#624 (3 or 4 seats at large in even years). In all districts the ballots need to be counted for each candidate so total counts can range from 0 to 8. 2. Determine Time and Cost Sources Number of offices or Counts 4 15 Total from estimator above Number of ballots in precinct 1,930 1,930 Average per precinct in 2020 Total votes/sorts (offices x Ballots)7,720 28,950 Calculated Time to process each vote (seconds)6 6 Known from time studies Total Seconds (votes x 6 seconds)46,320 173,700 Calculated Total Hours (total seconds/3600)12.9 48.3 Calculated Number Hours (2-person teams)26 97 Calculated Election Judges hourly rate of pay $15.50 $15.50 EJ= $15; Head Judge = $17 Total Cost (judge team hours x rate)$399 $1,496 *Source: Hands-On Elections , Nancy Tobi, 2010, pp 92-93. This time includes judge training organizing work, sorting, stacking, counting and tallying of votes on all ballots. Directions for use: The calculator above is set up to change based upon your inputs. 1. In Column B Rows 4-15 enter the offices to hand count. 2. In Column B, Row 23 enter the number of ballots in each precinct estimated or known. 3. In Column B, Row 29 enter the election judges hourly rate of pay. This set of data will produce a cost estimate. Disclaimer: This estimate does not include general administrative costs. CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2022 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,857 60 1,917 1,077 234 0 1,311 68.39% 2 2,206 55 2,261 1,272 344 1 1,617 71.52% 3 1,578 46 1,624 1,032 194 0 1,226 75.49% 4 2,429 86 2,515 1,248 566 0 1,814 72.13% 5 1,575 34 1,609 944 258 3 1,205 74.89% 6 2,637 71 2,708 1,559 391 2 1,952 72.08% 7 2,436 71 2,507 1,430 488 0 1,918 76.51% TOTALS 14,718 423 15,141 8,562 2,475 6 11,043 72.93% CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2020 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,375 121 1,496 716 634 0 1,350 90.24% 2 2,174 128 2,302 989 1,082 1 2,072 90.01% 3 1,621 129 1,750 854 708 2 1,564 89.37% 4 2,646 157 2,803 810 1,701 2 2,513 89.65% 5 1,324 63 1,387 561 660 3 1,224 88.25%6 2,575 137 2,712 1,073 1,405 1 2,479 91.41%7 2,382 132 2,514 962 1,340 4 2,306 91.73%TOTALS 14,097 867 14,964 5,965 7,530 13 13,508 90.27% CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERTED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2018 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,269 51 1,320 874 148 0 1,022 77.42% 2 2,031 104 2,135 1,358 305 0 1,663 77.89% 3 1,552 84 1,636 1,102 214 0 1,316 80.44%4 2,358 135 2,493 1,386 597 1 1,984 79.58%5 1,269 63 1,332 805 222 2 1,029 77.25%6 2,160 145 2,305 1,481 351 0 1,832 79.48% 7 2,221 94 2,315 1,496 395 1 1,892 81.73% TOTALS 12,860 676 13,536 8,502 2,232 4 10,738 79.33% CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2016 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,293 125 1,418 1,016 174 0 1,190 83.92%2 1,989 171 2,160 1,515 321 0 1,836 85.00%3 1,557 123 1,680 1,213 201 0 1,414 84.17%4 2,342 137 2,479 1,545 544 1 2,090 84.31% 5 1,287 66 1,353 942 210 2 1,154 85.29% 6 2,035 181 2,216 1,560 338 0 1,898 85.65% 7 2,167 163 2,330 1,599 381 0 1,980 84.98% TOTALS 12,670 966 13,636 9,390 2,169 3 11,562 84.79% 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2014 Total Total H/DPrecinctReg7AMEDRRegisteredInPersonABMBOtherBallotsTurnout 1 1,265 36 1,301 752 43 0 795 61.11% 2 1,927 52 1,979 1,097 62 0 1,159 58.56% 3 1,546 42 1,588 935 35 0 970 61.08% 4 2,237 78 2,315 1,357 140 0 1,497 64.67% 5 1,258 39 1,297 775 61 0 836 64.46% 6 1,899 58 1,957 1,093 79 0 1,172 59.89% 7 2,109 64 2,173 1,348 77 0 1,425 65.58% TOTALS 12,241 369 12,610 7,357 497 0 7,854 62.28% CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2012 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,236 172 1,408 1,116 81 0 1,197 85.01% 2 1,872 298 2,170 1,695 119 0 1,814 83.59% 3 1,522 210 1,732 1,364 102 0 1,466 84.64% 4 2,208 297 2,505 1,900 233 0 2,133 85.15% 5 1,207 180 1,387 1,061 99 0 1,160 83.63% 6 1,813 231 2,044 1,656 156 0 1,812 88.65%7 2,002 230 2,232 1,799 165 0 1,964 87.99%TOTALS 11,860 1,618 13,478 10,591 955 0 11,546 85.67% CITY OF LINO LAKES: REGISTERED VOTERS & BALLOTS CAST, 2010 Total Total H/D Precinct Reg7AM EDR Registered InPerson ABMB Other Ballots Turnout 1 1,219 82 1,301 859 32 0 891 68.49% 2 1,815 123 1,938 1,245 45 0 1,290 66.56% 3 1,519 80 1,599 1,053 35 0 1,088 68.04% 4 2,127 139 2,266 1,504 107 0 1,611 71.09%5 1,139 87 1,226 820 36 1 857 69.90%6 1,842 81 1,923 1,228 82 0 1,310 68.12%7 1,965 94 2,059 1,436 62 0 1,498 72.75% TOTALS 11,626 686 12,312 8,145 399 1 8,545 69.40% CITY OF LINO LAKES: IN-PERSON & ABSENTEE/MAIL-IN BALLOTS, 2010-2022 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 In-Person 8,145 10,591 7,357 9,390 8,502 5,965 8,562 ABMB 400 955 497 2,172 2,236 7,543 2,481 Total 8,545 11,546 7,854 11,562 10,738 13,508 11,043 CITY OF LINO LAKES: NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS PER PRECINCT, 2010-2022 Precinct 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 202211,301 1,408 1,301 1,418 1,320 1,496 1,91721,938 2,170 1,979 2,160 2,135 2,302 2,261 3 1,599 1,732 1,588 1,680 1,636 1,750 1,624 4 2,266 2,505 2,315 2,479 2,493 2,803 2,515 2 5 1,226 1,387 1,297 1,353 1,332 1,387 1,609 6 1,923 2,044 1,957 2,216 2,305 2,712 2,70872,059 2,232 2,173 2,330 2,315 2,514 2,507TOTALS12,312 13,478 12,610 13,636 13,536 14,964 15,141 CITY OF LINO LAKES: ELECTION DATA PROFILES, 2010-2022 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Population 20,216 20,500 20,700 20,900 21,200 21,399 21,973 (another s El Voters (I will estim Reg. Voters 12,312 13,478 12,610 13,636 13,536 14,964 15,141 Ballots 8,545 11,546 7,854 11,562 10,738 13,508 11,043 Avg/RegVoters 560 613 573 620 615 680 688 Avg/Ballots 388 525 357 526 488 614 502 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2 Chart Title In-Person ABMB Linear (ABMB) 3 4 5 2020 2022 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES: NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS PER PRECINCT, 2010-2022 Precinct 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Precint 1 1301 1408 1301 1418 1320 1496 1917 Precinct 2 1938 2170 1979 2160 2135 2302 2261 Precinct 3 1599 1732 1588 1680 1636 1750 1624 Precinct 4 2266 2505 2315 2479 2493 2803 2515 Precinct 5 1226 1387 1297 1353 1332 1387 1609 Precinct 6 1923 2044 1957 2216 2305 2712 2708 Precinct 7 2059 2232 2173 2330 2315 2514 2507 TOTALS 12312 13478 12610 13636 13536 14964 15141 Average 1,759 1,925 1,801 1,948 1,934 2,138 2,163 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Chart Title Precint 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 2 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 4 STAFF ORGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner DATE OF WORK SESSION: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Slater Addition Preliminary Plat ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND At the Work Session, staff will present the October 14, 2024 Council staff report. The applicant, Boulder Contracting, submitted a land use application for preliminary plat for Slater Addition. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 7869 Meadow View Trail into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family homes. The lot is 1.41 gross acres (61,294 sf). REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. October 14, 2024 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: October 14, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-134 Approving Slater Addition Preliminary Plat VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration of Resolution No. 24-134 approving Slater Addition preliminary plat. Review Deadline: Complete Application Date: July 31, 2024 60-Day Review Deadline:September 29, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: August 28, 2024 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: October 7, 2024 City Council Meeting: October 14, 2024 The applicant, Boulder Contracting, submitted a land use application for preliminary plat for Slater Addition. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 7869 Meadow View Trail into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family homes. The lot is 1.41 gross acres (61,294 sf). The Land Use Application is: •Preliminary Plat o 3 lots This staff report is based on the following information: Attachment 1: October 14, 2024 Council Staff Report 2 • Slater Addition plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated July 31, 2024 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated August 5, 2024 • Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations dated July 31, 2024 • Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title dated July 8, 2024. BACKGROUND Existing Site Conditions The residential lot contains an existing house, attached garage, deck, and fence. The house was built in 1982. The Certificate of Survey indicates Zimmerman Fine Sand and Soderville Fine Sand. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 5 to 7.5 feet. Zoning Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential 2040 Comp Plan Land Use Low Density Sewered Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North R-1, Single Family Residential Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve East R-1, Single Family Residential Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R, Rural Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential ANALYSIS Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. 3 Gross Area (acres) 1.41 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 1.41 # of Units 3 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.13 Net Density (units/acre) 2.13 The parcel is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.13 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Requirements The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Lot 3 will contain the existing single family house. Lots 1 and 2 are being created for the purpose of constructing two (2) single family homes. R-1 Requirements Lot 1 (Proposed House) Lot 2 (Proposed House) Lot 3 (Existing House) Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 17,200 sf 17,200 sf 26,895 sf Min. Lot Width --Corner Lot 100 ft NA NA 125 ft --Interior Lot 80 ft 80 ft 80 ft NA Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 215 ft 215 ft 215 ft Building Setback (ft) 4 -From Street 30 ft 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft (Lois & Meadow View) -Rear Yard --Principal 30 ft 115 ft 115 ft 16.3 fta -Accessory 5 ft Future Future 16.3 fta -Side Yard --Principal 10 ft 10-15 ft 10 ft 60 ft --Accessory 5 ft 10 ft 10.6 ft 40 ft Impervious Surface 65% TBD w/ building permit TBD w/ building permit 9.4% aThe existing house will become legal non-conforming. The proposed lots meet zoning requirements. Lot Frontage and Front Lot Line The current lot frontage and front lot line for the existing lot is along Meadow View Trail. The preliminary plat creates a 125ft lot width along Lois Lane for Lot 3 (existing house). The lot frontage and front lot line for Lot 3 (existing house) is now along Lois Lane. The rear lot line is opposite the front lot line which is the south lot line. The existing house is 16.3ft from the rear lot line making it legal non-conforming. The house address, driveway access, etc. does not change and will remain on Meadow View Trail. Per Zoning Ordinance Section 1007.001 Rules and Definitions: LOT FRONTAGE. The narrowest lot boundary abutting a public street or street easement that meets minimum lot width requirements. If none of the boundaries abutting a public street or street easement meet minimum lot width requirements, then the lot frontage is the widest boundary abutting a street. LOT LINE, FRONT. The lot line separating a lot from the street right-of-way along the lot frontage. LOT LINE, REAR. The lot line opposite and most distant from the lot frontage which connects the side lot lines. For the purposes of this chapter, the rear lot line of a triangular lot shall be a line entirely within the lot at least ten feet long and parallel to and most distance point from the front lot line. If the front lot line on such a lot is curved, the rear lot line shall be parallel to a line tangent to the front lot line. Building Requirements 5 At the time of building permit, the single family houses proposed on Lots 1 and 2 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards. Subdivision Ordinance The legal description of the existing lot is Lot 1, Block 4, Mar Don Acres and was platted in 1978. Similar residential subdivisions of Mar Don Acres lots have been approved in previous years (Cavegn Estates-2006, Hailey Manor-2007, Isabell Estates-2014, Golden Acre-2017, Butler Addition-2021). Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential development and zoning code requirements for R-1, Single Family Residential as discussed above. Blocks and Lots The preliminary plat contains Lots 1-3, Block 1, Slater Addition. As noted above, Lot 3 contains the existing house and Lots 1 and 2 propose new single family homes. Streets and Alleys Lots 1 and 2 are served by Lois Lane which is a minor collector road. The existing road right-of- way width is 60 ft which is consistent with previously approved plats in the area. No additional road right-of-way is needed. Lot 3 is served by Meadow View Trail which is a local road. The existing road right-of-way width is 60 ft. No additional road right-of-way is needed. In 2021, the City vacated the cul de sac road right-of-way and related drainage and utility easement that existed on the west end of the lot. The recorded document number is 2320299.001. Easements The Mar Don Acres final plat has existing drainage and utility easements dedicated per the plat. These easements will remain in place. Standard drainage and utility easements at least ten (10) feet wide have been provided along all other lot lines within the proposed Slater Addition. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control 6 The proposed development does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. Utilities Sanitary Sewer A 2” pressurized sanitary sewer main exists along this section of Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house on Lot 3 is connected to municipal sanitary sewer. The new houses shall connect to municipal sanitary sewer. Watermain An 8” watermain exists along Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house on Lot 3 is connected to the municipal watermain. A private well exists new the driveway and may continue to be used for irrigation or it shall be abandoned. The new houses shall connect to the municipal watermain. Public Land Dedication The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area. The development is not within the greenway system. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 3 with the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 2 x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300 = Total Due $6,600 Landscape Plan Per the August 28, 2024 Environmental Board staff report: Boulevard Trees Boulevard trees are required for all new residential subdivisions at a rate of one tree per lot frontage. 7 A 26” caliper oak tree is being preserved in the front yard of Lot 1. No additional boulevard tree is proposed for this lot or recommended. A boulevard tree is shown on the landscape plan for lot 2. This tree should be relocated to the right-of-way. The existing house (lot 3) has a tree in the right-of-way area and will not require an additional boulevard tree. Boulevard tree requirements are met provided the boulevard tree is relocated to the right-of- way. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation while not interfering with landowners’ reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey was performed that identified: Of the 67 total trees in the inventory, 30 trees will be removed, 37 will be preserved. The 37 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. 29 of the tree removals are in the Basic Use Area (BUA) and do not require mitigation. One tree planned for removal is in a non-BUA and non-ESA (14” maple on Lot 2). This tree will require mitigation at a one to one ratio. Overall, for the 30 removals, 1 mitigation trees will be required. This tree must be added to the Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards are met with the addition of 1 mitigation tree. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots. Total Trees 67 Total Trees Removed 30 Total Trees Preserved 37 Mitigation Trees Required 1 8 Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Wetlands There are no wetlands on site. FEMA Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district. Impervious Surface Coverage The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 3 (existing house) is at 9.4% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lot 1 and 2 will be evaluated with those individual building permits and surveys. 9 Traffic Study A traffic study was not required for two (2) new single family lots on the Lois Lane. The street is a minor collector and has capacity for two (2) additional single family homes. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Public Safety Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety Department-Police Division and Fire Division reviewed the preliminary plat and had no comments. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal on August 28, 2024. Their comments are summarized in the attached Environmental Memo dated August 29, 2024. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the development proposal on September 11, 2024 and recommended approval with revisions as noted in the resolution. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010. Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Slater Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the parcel is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed three (3) single family and net density of 2.13 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 10 The site is located in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. Housing Plan A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Slater Addition meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing. Economic Development The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the City’s economic development plan. Transportation Plan A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Lois Lane is a minor collector road and has capacity to accommodate two (2) new single family homes. Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems. Slater Addition does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan calls for silt fence and a rock construction exit. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The existing house is connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. The two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 2” pressurized system. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for two (2) additional single family houses. Water Supply Plan 11 A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The existing house is connected to the municipal water supply system. The two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 8” watermain. The existing water supply system has capacity for two (2) additional single family houses. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Findings of Fact Resolution No. 24-134 details the findings of fact for the Slater Addition preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATION Staff and Boards recommend approval of the Slater Addition preliminary plat. ATTACHMENTS 1. Slater Addition plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. and dated July 31, 2024 2. City Engineer Memo dated September 4, 2024 3. Environmental Memo dated August 29, 2024 4. Resolution No. 24-134 10 10 55 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY EX I S T I N G HO U S E 906.6 SB? 906.9 SB? (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2157 SLATER ADDITION (LINO LAKES)\2157 CAD\2157 BASE 1.DWG Wednesday, July 31, 2024 10:30:21 AM 1 INCH = 50 FEET HORIZONTAL 50 0 25 50 100 SHEET INDEX CO TITLE SHEET VICINITY MAP ( NOT TO SCALE ) DEVELOPER BOULDER CONTRACTING, LLC 16522 WAKE ST NE HAM LAKE, MN 55304 BRIAN JANSEN 612-369-2746 BRIAN@BOULDER CONTRACTINGLLC.COM ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. 651-361-8234 ADAM@PLOWE.COM TITLE SHEET SLATER ADDITION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA AN MPCA NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION SURVEYOR E.G. RUD & SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 JASON RUD 651-361-8225 JRUD@EGRUD.COM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : B O U L D E R C O N T R A C T I N G , L L C SL A T E R A D D I T I O N LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 5 7 DA T E : JO B N O : 07 / 3 1 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET GRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC PLANC1.1 S1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY WITH RESOURCE INVENTORY MAP S2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1.2 UTILITY PLAN C1.3 C2.1 REMOVALS PLAN C0 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 07 . 3 1 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . LANDSCAPE PLAN TI T L E S H E E T , N O T E S & L E G E N D ALL PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERMITS FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES, MNDOT, AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ORDERING OF MATERIAL AND STARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. NO INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED UNTIL ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS ARE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND CITY STANDARDS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING STANDARDS. PR E L I M I N A R Y NO R T H 24-2157 SITE S3 TREE INVENTORY WITH REMOVALS DETAILSC3.1 907.9 907.8 907.70 FNDIP47223 905.96 FNDIP5332 908.09 TC 907.93 TC 907.77 TC 907.58 TC 907.7 907.9 908.0 908.4 908.3 908.1 907.6 907.42 TC 907.6 MB C O 908.05 CO SAN CS907.9 2056 907.9 PINE16 2057 908.0 PINE16 2058 907.9 PINE12 907.16 TC 907.00 TC 907.8 908.4 2073 908.4 POPLAR14 CS 908.3 C O 908.27 CO SAN 908.0 907.9 POLE W/EB 907.6 907.8 908.2 908.1908.1 908.3 SoA 125.0980.00 125.0980.00 215.00 215.00 11001 908.11 TRAVIP 9 0 8 .0 1 F N D I P 9 0 1 8 907.62 FNDIP9018 911.20 FNDIPREBAR23266 906.78 FNDIP9018 910.07 909.78 909.79 9 10 .1 0 9 1 0 .6 9 910.48 910.30 9 1 0 . 5 1 907.6BIR12-8-6 907.9 SPR8 909.2 SPR22 910.25 910.02 9 0 7.8 9 906.9 SPR14 906.6 SPR12 906.4 SPR14 906.7 SPR 14 9 0 6 .7 S PR 1 0 906.5 SPR6 90 6 . 7 PIN 1 6 90 6 . 5 PIN 1 6 9 0 7 .0 9 07.70 9 0 7.3 4 908.03 908.43 908.83 909.68 909.98 910.46910.5 4 909.7 MAP22 910.2 MAP12-8 912.6 BOX10-10-8-8-4 911.4 OAK8 9 11 . 8 B O X 10 911.4 TREE10-DEAD 911.9 TREE8 912.2 BOX12-6-6 906.7 OAK26 910.19 MH-SEP 9 0 9.5 S P R 1 6 907.6 ELM26 907.5 ELM24 906.6 906.9907.1 909 .3 910.1 9 0 9.1 909.4 PIN16 909.0 PIN14 909.4 PIN14 910.2 PIN16 909.1 SPR18 90 9.85 W ELL 908.33 908.05 9 0 8 .1 1 9 07 .7 1 9 0 7.6 2907.40 9 07 .18 907.45 907.31 907.26 907.06 907.23 906.99 9 06 .79 90 6 .6 3 906.83 906.61 906.43906.40 9 0 6.5 9 9 06.68 906.50 906.83 9 0 6 . 8 4 906.88 907.00 9 0 6.8 7 907.06 907.06 9 0 7.1 9 907.44 9 0 7.4 6 907.53 907.42907.39 9 0 7 .6 5 9 0 8 .1 2 907.81 907.61 907.76 907.80 907.75 907.49 907.16 906.97 906.92 906.939 0 6 . 7 0 9 0 6 .3 9CO905.84 905.68 9 0 6 .1 1 906.01 906.23 906.32 9 06.4 0 906.48 9 0 6.8 0 906.70 907.08 907.07 907.8CS 906.9 907.88 907.89 9 0 7.5 5 906 907 9 0 8 9 0 9 9 10 911912 910 909 908 907 908 9 0 8 911 907 907 24.3 64.1 23.9 64.3 907.56 SANSRV CS 907.18 SANSRV 9 0 6 . 6 2 S A N S R V CS 80.00 80.00 215.00 906.6 SB? 906.9 SB? SLAB LOW ENTRY = 911.0 LOW FLOOR = 911.0 2.0% EX. 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 7.3% 55.0 60.0 55.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 SLAB LOW ENTRY = 911.0 LOW FLOOR = 911.0 907 910 910 910 2.0% 7.8% LOW AREA HWL907.6 FM FM FM F M F M FM FM FM FM FM EX-T/C EX-T/C 910 910 910 2.0% 2.0%2.0% 907 9 08 910 9 0 8 9 0 8 9 0 8 908 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 910.20 908.50 906.97 907.42 EOF 906.67 907.11 910.30 910.30 910.30 SILT FENCE (TYP) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINEFIBER DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEBLDSB DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 CO CS S W DENOTES TREE LINE LEGEND (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2157 SLATER ADDITION (LINO LAKES)\2157 CAD\2157 BASE 2.DWG Monday, August 12, 2024 11:08:27 AM NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : B O U L D E R C O N T R A C T I N G , L L C SL A T E R A D D I T I O N LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 5 7 DA T E : JO B N O : 07 / 3 1 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.1 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 08 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E & E S C P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24−2157 ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. PHASE I: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 2. PROVIDE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 3.1. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. 3.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 3.3. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN-PLACE UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 3.4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL FOR ANY SLOPES THAT APPEAR TO BE FAILING. (NOTE: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MUST HAVE NON-FIXED JOINTS AND BE FULLY BIODEGRADABLE; ANY BLANKET NETTING MUST BE LOOSE-WEAVE.) 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 5. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AS APPLICABLE. 6. PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA-BY-AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. 6.1. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 7. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES TO ENSURE THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INPLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 8. STABILIZE SOIL STOCKPILES; STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY. 9. FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SWEEP/SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS WHEN MATERIALS OR DEBRIS HAVE WASHED/FLOWED ONTO ADJACENT STREETS OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. PHASE II: 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEED FOR DISTURBED AREAS. 2. INSTALL RIP-RAP AT FLARED-END SECTIONS (AS APPLICABLE). 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLET STRUCTURES IN PAVING AREAS (AS APPLICABLE.) 4. INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, STORM SEWER. 5. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND/OR SOD. 6. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONLY AFTER SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. ** SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY BIODEGRADABLE, NON FIXED JOINT FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. * MOW A MINIMUM OF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - ONCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF - ONCE PER 4 WEEKS 3885 (CATEGORY 2)WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3881FERTILIZER 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED)MULCH * FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT ITEM 3876SEED ** 3878SOD MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY MNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE)FALL COVER MNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE)SPRING/SUMMER MNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE)1-2 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE)2-5 YEARS COVER COMMERCIAL TURF RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE)SOIL-BUILDING COVER 3884HYDROMULCH REVEGETATION SPECIFICATIONS TIMING FOR EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL R Call before you dig. below.Know what's SITE AREA = 61,295 SF AREA OF DISTURBANCE = 34,680 SF = 0.80 ACRES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 3,304 SF NEW & RECONSTRUCTED IMPERVIOUS LOT 1 DRIVEWAY * = 1,376 SF LOT 1 HOUSE / PATIO = 2,500 SF LOT 2 DRIVEWAY * = 1,372 SF LOT 2 HOUSE / PATIO = 2,500 SF TOTAL = 7,748 SF * INCLUDES INSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY GRADING INFORMATION RC W D R E V I E W C O M M E N T S 08 - 1 2 - 2 4 GENERAL NOTES 1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2.CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4.ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6.PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8.ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. 907.9 907.8 908.3 907.6 MB CO 908.05 CO SAN CS 90 7 . 9 2056 907.9 PINE16 2057 908.0 PINE16 2058 907.9 PINE12 2073 908.4 POPLAR14 CS 908.3 CO 908.27 CO SAN 907.9 POLE W/EB 907.6 125.0980.00 125.0980.00 21 5 . 0 0 21 5 . 0 0 90 7 . 6 BI R 1 2 - 8 - 6 907.9 SPR8 909.2 SPR22 906.9 SPR14 906.6 SPR12 906.4 SPR14 9 0 6 . 7 SP R 1 4 906.7 SPR10 906.5 SPR6 906 . 7 PI N 1 6 906 . 5 PI N 1 6 9 0 6 . 6 PI N 1 0 906 . 7 PI N 1 2 906 . 8 PIN 1 4 906.7 PIN16 906 . 3 SPR 1 6 90 6 . 1 SP R 1 2 90 6 . 3 SPR 1 6 906.4 SPR8 906.6 SPR10 907.1 SPR10 906.6 SPR16 906.3 SPR14 906 . 7 PIN1 4 906.8 PIN16 906.8 PIN18 906.2 SPR18 906.6 SPR10 906 . 9 SPR 6 907.3 SPR6 907.4 SPR6 908.3 OAK10 909. 0 OAK 1 0 90 7 . 9 PI N 1 2 908.5 MAP14 907.7 MAP22 907.6 MAP18 909.7 MAP22 910.2 MAP12-8 912.6 BOX10-10 - 8 - 8 - 4 911.4 OAK8 9 1 1 . 8 B O X 1 0 911.4 TREE10-DEAD 911.9 TREE8 912.2 BOX12-6-6 911.2 OAK32 909.0 ELM14-12 909.9 OAK36 906.7 OAK26 907.2 BOX6 910 . 1 9 MH - S E P 909.5 SPR1 6 907.6 ELM26 907.5 ELM24 909.4 PIN16 909.0 PIN14 909.4 PIN14 910.2 PIN16 909.1 SPR18 90 9 . 8 5 W E L L CO CS 24.3 64 . 1 23.9 64 . 3 907.56 SANSRV CS 907.18SANSRV 9 0 6 . 6 2 S A N S R V CS 80.00 80.00 21 5 . 0 0 906.6 SB? 906.9 SB? EX. 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (RED - TYP) REMOVE FENCE WITHIN LOT 2 LIMITS (VERIFY W/ DEVELOPER) REMOVE PAVERS EXISTING SEPTIC TO BE REMOVED PER LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS EXISTING WELL TO BE SEALED PER LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINEFIBER DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEBLDSB DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W DENOTES TREE LINE LEGEND NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2157 SLATER ADDITION (LINO LAKES)\2157 CAD\2157 BASE 1.DWG Wednesday, July 31, 2024 10:30:21 AM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : B O U L D E R C O N T R A C T I N G , L L C SL A T E R A D D I T I O N LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 5 7 DA T E : JO B N O : 07 / 3 1 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.2 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 07 . 3 1 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . RE M O V A L S P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2157 GENERAL NOTES 1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2.CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4.ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6.PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8.ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. 907.9 907.8 907.70 FNDIP47223 905.96 FNDIP5332 908.3 907.6 MB CO 908.05 CO SAN CS 90 7 . 9 2056 907.9 PINE16 2057 908.0 PINE16 2058 907.9 PINE12 907.8 2073 908.4 POPLAR14 CS 908.3 CO 908.27 CO SAN 908.0 907.9 POLE W/EB 907.6 90 7 . 8 908.2 125.0980.00 125.0980.00 21 5 . 0 0 21 5 . 0 0 11001 908.11 TRAVIP 908.0 1 FNDI P 9 0 1 8 90 7 . 6 2 FN D I P 9 0 1 8 911.20 FNDIPREBAR23266 906.78 FNDIP9018 90 7 . 6 BI R 1 2 - 8 - 6 907.9 SPR8 909.2 SPR22 906.9 SPR14 906.6 SPR12 906.4 SPR14 9 0 6 . 7 SP R 1 4 906.7 SPR10 906.5 SPR6 906 . 7 PI N 1 6 906 . 5 PI N 1 6 909.7 MAP22 910.2 MAP12-8 912.6 BOX10-10 - 8 - 8 - 4 911.4 OAK8 9 1 1 . 8 B O X 1 0 911.4 TREE10-DEAD 911.9 TREE8 912.2 BOX12-6-6 906.7 OAK26 910 . 1 9 MH - S E P 909.5 SPR1 6 907.6 ELM26 907.5 ELM24 909.4 PIN16 909.0 PIN14 909.4 PIN14 910.2 PIN16 909.1 SPR18 90 9 . 8 5 W E L L CO CS 24.3 64 . 1 23.9 64 . 3 907.56 SANSRV CS 907.18SANSRV 9 0 6 . 6 2 S A N S R V CS 80.00 80.00 21 5 . 0 0 906.6 SB? 906.9 SB? SLAB LE = 911.0 LF = 911.0 GARAGE 911.0 EX. 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN SLAB LE = 911.0 LF = 911.0 GARAGE 911.0 EXISTING BOULEVARD TREE TO REMAIN PROPOSED TREE GINKGO BILOBA "GINKGO TREE" EXISTING TREES TO SERVE AS BOULEVARD TREES FOR LOT 3 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP) DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINEFIBER DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEBLDSB DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W DENOTES TREE LINE LEGEND NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2157 SLATER ADDITION (LINO LAKES)\2157 CAD\2157 BASE 1.DWG Wednesday, July 31, 2024 10:30:21 AM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : B O U L D E R C O N T R A C T I N G , L L C SL A T E R A D D I T I O N LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 5 7 DA T E : JO B N O : 07 / 3 1 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.3 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 07 . 3 1 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . LA N D S C A P E P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2157 BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS. a.BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. b.BOULEVARD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT THE RATE OF ONE TREE PER LOT FRONTAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY LOTS. TOWNHOME AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES SHALL PROVIDE BOULEVARD TREES AT A RATE OF ONE TREE PER 70 LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE WHERE PROPERTY FRONTS ANY PUBLIC STREET. c.BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 14 FEET OF THE CURB LINE OR AS OTHERWISE DETERMINED BY THE CITY FORESTER. d.EXISTING TREES MAY BE USED TO FULFILL BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS AT THE CITY'S DISCRETION. e.THE CITY MAY, AT ITS DISCRETION, PURCHASE AND INSTALL THE REQUIRED BOULEVARD TREES. IN SUCH CASE, THE CITY SHALL COLLECT A STANDARD FEE PER TREE. SAID FEE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND BASED ON THE ESTIMATED MARKET RATE COST TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL TREES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS SOD AND GROUND COVER a.SEED MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF SOD IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CASES: a.1.WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED TO FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS, OR a.2.WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED ADJACENT TO NATURAL AREAS OR WETLANDS. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY, OR a.3.FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. SOD MAY BE REQUIRED IN AREAS SUBJECT TO EROSION AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR CITY ENGINEER. b.UNDISTURBED AREAS CONTAINING EXISTING VIABLE NATURAL VEGETATION WHICH CAN BE MAINTAINED FREE OF FOREIGN AND NOXIOUS PLANT MATERIALS. c.AREAS DESIGNATED AS OPEN SPACE OR FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS PROPERLY PLANTED AND MAINTAINED WITH NATIVE GRASSES OR WILD FLOWERS INDIGENOUS TO MINNESOTA. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. d.USE OF MULCH MATERIALS SUCH AS BARK, WOOD CHIPS, AND DECORATIVE ROCK IN SUPPORT OF SHRUBS AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS. e.NATIVE LANDSCAPES IN COMPLIANCE WITH M.S. § 412.925. GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. 1. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE 1.25" DIAMETER HDPE MEETING ASTM d3350 AND CONFORMING TO ASTMD3035, AWWA C-901, AND ASTM F714. PIPE SHALL BE PE 3608 OR PE 4710 WITH A PRESSURE RATING OF 160 PSI OR GREATER. 2. FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 1. WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE 1" COPPER TYPE K, ASTM B88, FROM THE STUB TO THE PROPOSED HOMES. 2. FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING WATERMAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 3. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER OVER ALL WATERMAIN PIPE. 4. WATERMAIN SHUTOFF REQUIRES A MIN. 48 HOUR NOTICE TO CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS. SANITARY SEWER NOTES WATERMAIN NOTES 907.9 907.8 907.70 FNDIP47223 905.96 FNDIP5332 907.6 MB C O 908.05 CO SAN CS907.9 CS 908.3 C O 908.27 CO SAN 907.9 POLE W/EB 907.6 SoA 125.0980.00 125.0980.00 215.00 215.00 9 0 8 .0 1 F N D I P 9 0 1 8 907.62 FNDIP9018 911.20 FNDIPREBAR23266 906.78 FNDIP9018 910.19 MH-SEP CO CS 24.3 64.1 23.9 64.3 907.56 SANSRV CS 907.18 SANSRV 9 0 6 . 6 2 S A N S R V CS 80.00 80.00 215.00 906.6 SB? 906.9 SB? SLAB LOW ENTRY = 911.0 LOW FLOOR = 911.0 EXISTING SANITARY CLEANOUT EXISTING SANITARY AND WATER SERVICE EXISTING SANITARY AND WATER SERVICE EXISTING SANITARY AND WATER SERVICE EX. 2" HDPE DR 21 FORCEMAIN EX. 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN SLAB LOW ENTRY = 911.0 LOW FLOOR = 911.0 RAISE CURB STOP TO MATCH NEW DRIVEWAY GRADE AND PROVIDE FORD A-1 COVER (TYP. FOR LOTS 1 AND 2) FOR ALL LOTS, EACH HOUSE IS TO HAVE A SANITARY GRINDER LIFT STATION (E-ONE OR APPROVED EQUAL) WITH CHECK VALVE - CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE - PROVIDE FORD A-1 COVER FOR CLEANOUTS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS FM FM FM F M F M FM FM FM FM FM FORCEMAIN AND WATER SERVICE ROUTING - VERIFY WITH OWNER DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINEFIBER DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEBLDSB DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 CO CS S W DENOTES TREE LINE LEGEND NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2157 SLATER ADDITION (LINO LAKES)\2157 CAD\2157 BASE 1.DWG Wednesday, July 31, 2024 10:30:21 AM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : B O U L D E R C O N T R A C T I N G , L L C SL A T E R A D D I T I O N LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 5 7 DA T E : JO B N O : 07 / 3 1 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C2.1 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 07 . 3 1 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . UT I L I T Y P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24−2157 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: September 4, 2024 Re: Slater Addition Preliminary Plat & Civil Plan Review 026378-000 As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans for the Slater Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received April 12, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Slater Addition – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated July 31, 2024. • Slater Addition – Certificate of Survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, dated July 30, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. Engineering • Grading The Slater Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to create three (3) single-family lots. There are urban sections along both Lois Lane and Meadowview Trail. An existing drainage swale generally flows counterclockwise around the lots at minimal grade discharging to the northwest. Comments: 1. Provide existing contours and/or spot elevations on and adjacent to the west property line to show match elevations and directions of flow 2. Currently there is a large low area on the northern half of Lot 3 that receives a large area of drainage from these and adjacent lots but does not drain out • Show the 907.6 HWL limits of this area 3. Provide high points for where the drainage breaks in the back adjacent to Lot 2. 4. Provide drainage and utility easements for surface drainage from one lot to another. 5. Call out the rear berm. 6. Hold down grades at the front house corners of Lots 1 and 2 as necessary to maintain maximum 3:1 slopes. • Increase frost depths as necessary Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04//2024 Page 2 Slater Addition Engineering Review 7. Provide spot elevations of rear swale from south including all property lines • Show proposed slopes • Try to increase rear swale by adjusting proposed 908 contour line • Stormwater Management Stormwater management is not required under City ordinance. • Water Supply The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services extended to the lots from Lois Lane. Comments: 1. City records show that the utilities to the existing house (Lot 3) are already connected to the City system • Show existing water service alignment • Otherwise, show connecting the existing house (Lot 3) to the provided water service stub with construction • Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 3 per MDH requirements with construction i. Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation use if MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services 2. Keep utility services for Lot 3 out of the low area HWL • Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by three 1¼” diameter Schedule 40 PVC low pressure service pipes extended to the lots from Lois Lane. All lots will require E-One or approved equal grinder pump stations to connect to the City system. Comments: 1. City records show that the utilities to the existing house (Lot 3) are already connected to the City system • Verify whether a low pressure grinder station is currently connected to the City system as shown on the existing conditions plan sheet i. Show sanitary sewer alignment ii. Clarify how the existing sanitary sewer manhole to be removed is incorporated into the current system • Show septic system for existing house (Lot 3) if present i. Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with construction and show connecting to the provided sanitary sewer stubs with construction 1. Sanitary sewer service stub is 1 1/4" PVC SCH 40 Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04//2024 Page 3 Slater Addition Engineering Review 2. Show installation of E-One or equivalent grinder pump station 3. Keep utility services for Lot 3 out of the low area HWL • Transportation There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing single-family lot into three smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly more traffic. • Trails and sidewalks There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with none being proposed • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no wetlands identified on the site • Landscaping The Slater Addition Site Landscape Plan will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The Slater Addition does not impact floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single- family corner lot (10’ front (Meadow View Trail) and back; 10’ north side (Lois Lane), 5’ south side). Additional easements have been added around the perimeter of the smaller lots resulting in; • The proposed Lot 1 will have 10’ in the front (north), 10’ on the west side, 5’ on the east side, and 5’ easement in the back (south). • The proposed Lot 2 will have 10’ in the front (north), 5’ on the sides, and 5’ easement in the back (south). • The proposed Lot 3 will have 10’ in the front (east), 10’ on the north side, 5’ on the south side, and 5’ easement in the back (west). Comments: 1. Provide additional drainage and utility easement that completely contains the 907.6 HWL of the low area in the northern portion of Lot 3. • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04//2024 Page 4 Slater Addition Engineering Review • Grading Agreement No grading agreement is required for this site. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement No stormwater maintenance declaration agreement is required for this site. • Permits Required 1. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 2. NPDES General Construction Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Date: August 29, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments – Slater Addition Environmental Board had recommended the following at their August 28, 2024 meeting: 1. Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) for the 37 trees scheduled for preservation must be shown to scale on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1), Removals Plan (Sheet C1.2), and the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of sediment and erosion control measures. 2. Replace note on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan about installing tree protection with “Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail”. 3. The Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) should include a note that “Existing Trees shall be protected in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail. City Tree Protection Fence Detail should be added to Sheet C3.1. 4. The tree planting detail shall include comments about exposing root flare so it is visibly at grade to ensure trees are installed at proper depth, and that mulch is pulled back 3 inches from the trunk (mulch is not left touching the trunk). 5. 2 mitigation trees are required. These trees must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). At least one tree shall be included on Lot 2, Block 1. 6. The boulevard tree shown for Lot 1 must be moved north into the right-of-way. 7. Ground cover types must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). This includes cover type for all exposed soil areas (ex: sod for the lots) Environmental Memo 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-134 APPROVING SLATER ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Slater Addition preliminary plat hereafter referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the Development based on the following submittals: • Slater Addition plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated July 31, 2024 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo GeoTechnical Services dated August 5, 2024 • Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations dated July 31, 2024 • Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title dated July 8, 2024; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on September 11, 2024 and the Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat with a 7-0 vote. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: FINDINGS OF FACT Per Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Slater Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan in regards to land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. 2 (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Slater Addition is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. 3 However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Slater Addition meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Lois Lane is a minor collector road and has capacity to accommodate two (2) new single family homes. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Slater Addition will have an adequate water supply. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Slater Addition will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. 4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Slater Addition preliminary plat is not a premature subdivision; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Slater Addition preliminary plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A Land Use Application and submittals are required for final plat after City Council approval of preliminary plat. 2. The new houses on proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Slater Addition shall connect to municipal watermain and municipal sanitary sewer main. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following items shall be addressed at the time of final plat submittal: 1. Comments from City Engineer Memo dated September 4, 2024. 2. Comments from Environmental Memo dated August 29, 2024. 3. The Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations shall note the name and company that prepared the document. 4. All plan sheets shall be signed by a professional. 5. Sheet S1, Certificate of Survey: a. Under Area: i. Shouldn’t the lot area be 1.41 acres? ii. This shall be corrected on all applicable plan sheets. b. Water connection to existing house shall be shown. i. This shall be shown on all applicable plan sheets. 6. Sheet S2, Preliminary Plat: a. Under Area: i. The lot area shall be corrected. ii. The gross density and net density shall be corrected. b. Water connection to existing house shall be shown. The following items shall be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylars: 1. The existing pavers shall be removed. 2. The existing fence proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Slater Addition shall be removed. The following items shall be addressed prior to issuing building permits for with Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1, Slater Addition: 1. Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan, notes the existing septic and existing well to be removed per local and state regulations. a. The developer shall submit to the City the MPCA SSTA Abandonment Reporting Form as proof that the private septic system has been properly removed. 5 b. The developer shall submit to the City the MDH Well and Boring Sealing Record as proof that the private well has been properly capped. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5 STAFF ORGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner DATE OF WORK SESSION: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Home Occupation Permits ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND At the Work Session, staff will present the October 14, 2024 Council staff report. The applicant, Connor Mattioli, submitted a Land Use Application for a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to allow for home occupation businesses related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1.October 14, 2024 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: October 14, 2024 TOPIC: Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 13-24 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment- Home Occupation Permits VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 13-24 approving the 1st reading of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment-Home Occupation Permits. Review Deadline: Complete Application Date: August 2, 2024 60-Day Deadline:October 1, 2024 60-Day Extension:November 30, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: NA Park Board Meeting: NA Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: October 7, 2024 City Council Meeting: 1st Reading: October 14, 2024 2nd Reading: October 28, 2024 BACKGROUND The applicant, Connor Mattioli, submitted a Land Use Application for a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to allow for home occupation businesses related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons. ANALYSIS City Code Section 1007.056 regulates home occupation permits. Per City Code Section 1007.056(6)(a): Attachment 1: October 14, 2024 Council Staff Report 2 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation. The applicant is requesting the ordinance be amended to: 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation. Please review the attached applicant’s narrative for further information. Currently, his business is licensed with ATF and has a Federal Firearms License (FFL) type 7. Previous Zoning Ordinance In 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-10 which amended the zoning ordinance related to home occupation. That ordinance included the language prohibiting any business involving explosives, ammunition or weapons as a home occupation. Staff reviewed previous staff reports and minutes and did not find any particular reason why this language was added. ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) The ATF is the federal agency that regulates explosives, ammunition and weapons. Per their website What We Do | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (atf.gov) and attached, ATF's responsibilities include the investigation and prevention of federal offenses involving the unlawful use, manufacture, and possession of firearms and explosives; acts of arson and bombings; and illegal trafficking of alcohol and tobacco products. The ATF also regulates, via licensing, the sale, possession, and transportation of firearms, ammunition, and explosives in interstate commerce. Public Safety Lino Lakes Public Safety reviewed the proposed text amendment and have no objection. Other Communities Per the applicant’s narrative, neighboring cities do not restrict the use of explosives, ammunition or weapons as part of their home occupation. Planning & Zoning Board 3 The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on September 11, 2024. Public comments included concerns about the number of sales, a neighborhood daycare, cul de sac, ammunition, and explosives. The Board recommended on a 5-2 vote the following amendment: 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, or ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation. In summary, you could have a home occupation business related to weapons but you could not have a home occupation business related to explosives or ammunition. After the Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the applicant requested the language be amended again. His concern is that the Board’s proposed amendment would not allow him to use ammunition to test any firearm he manufactures. Below is the applicant’s proposed language. 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, or manufacturing of ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation. See attached applicant email dated October 2, 2024 for additional information. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting Council consideration of the 1st reading of Ordinance No. 13-24. Please note the ordinance is written using the text amendment language as proposed by the Planning & Zoning Board. ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant’s Narrative and Proposed Ordinance Amendment 2. ATF Website - “What Do We Do” 3. Lino Lakes Public Safety Memo dated August 29, 2024 4. Applicant Email dated October 2, 2024 5. Ordinance No. 13-24 Proposed Text Amendment for Lino Lakes City Code Contents Proposed Text Amendment for Lino Lakes City Code ..................................................................... 1 Current Language ..................................................................................................................... 2 Proposed revision ..................................................................................................................... 2 Current Business Activities and Requirements .............................................................................. 2 Customer Frequency ................................................................................................................ 2 Licensing overview ................................................................................................................... 2 FFL Types ................................................................................................................................. 3 Surrounding Cities Ordinances ..................................................................................................... 4 Blaine ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Columbus ................................................................................................................................ 4 Hugo ........................................................................................................................................ 4 White Bear Township: ............................................................................................................... 4 City of North Oaks .................................................................................................................... 4 City of Shoreview ...................................................................................................................... 4 City of Circle Pins ..................................................................................................................... 4 References .................................................................................................................................. 5 Current Language 1007.056(6)(a) subsection 14: "No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation." (Lakes, 2024) Proposed Revision 1007.056(6)(a) subsection 14: "No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation." (Lakes, 2024) With the removal of explosives, ammunition or weapons, this would allow for the Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to monitor and regulate businesses that choose to work with explosives, ammunition, or weapons. This would subsequently allow the ATF to monitor and revoke any licenses and have more transparency into the business of firearms. The removal of this verbiage would not allow for weapons, explosives, and ammunition to be manufactured or sold without a Federal Firearms License (FFL). Current Business Activities and Requirements Customer Frequency The current frequency of customers at my house is on a scheduled basis where an appointment needs to be setup by the customer to ensure that I would be able to assist in the transfer of a firearm. I have had only a handful of customers but not additional noticeable traffic or pickups would occur at the home due to this change. Licensing overview Currently my business is licensed with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tabacco, Firearms, and Explosives with a type 7 Federal Firearms License. Below I will describe more about what this means. Currently there are no state licenses that I need to obtain other than sustaining my LLC which isn’t necessary for obtaining an FFL. There are more restrictions on my type of FFL specifically with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations or ITAR for short. This regulated the manufacture, sale, and distribution of defense and space-related articles. As well as working with explosive devices as well as items in the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) and the National Firearms Act (NFA), you need to obtain and maintain a Special Occupational Taxpayer (SOT) deal, manufacture, or import items in the NFA/GCA. FFL Types • Type 01 – Firearm Dealer/Gunsmith o May purchase and sell guns as business o Can obtain an SOT • Type 02 – Pawnbroker o May purchase and sell guns as business o Can obtain an SOT • Type 03 – Collector o Can not engage in the business of firearms o Not Applicable for an SOT • Type 06 – Manufacture of Ammunition o Can not work with firearms o Not Applicable for an SOT • Type 07 – Manufacturer of Firearms o Can manufacture firearms and ammunition o Can obtain an SOT • Type 08 – Importer of Firearms o Can import ammunition and firearms and act as a dealer o Requires an SOT • Type 09 – Dealer of “Destructive Devices” o Can deal in explosives, ammunition, and firearms o Requires an SOT • Type 10 – Manufacturer of “Destructive Devices” o Can manufacture explosives, ammunition, firearms, and act as a dealer o Requires an SOT • Type 11 – Importer of “Destructive Devices” o Can import explosives, ammunition, firearms, and act as a dealer o Requires an SOT • More information regarding this can be found at the link below (Cleckner, 2024) Surrounding Cities Ordinances Blaine Blaine has no restrictions on explosives, ammunition, or weapon related business included in any subsections of blain code of ordinances part three chapter 33 section 10. (Blaine, 2024) Columbus Columbus has no restrictions on explosives, ammunition, or weapon related businesses included in any section of Columbus’s city code Section 7A-201(49) or Section 7A-612. (Columbus, 2024) Hugo While Hugo doesn’t have language that prohibits the business to be associated with weapons, Hugo has the following restriction of no assembly, manufacturing, repair, or other business operations are conducted within an accessory structure. Would still be allowed within primary structure on the property. Hugo City Code Chapter 90 Article VI Division 1 Sec. 90-232(C) states the following. White Bear Township: The City of White Bear Township has no provisions in section 1302.120 that would restrict a business that would be related to weapons, explosives, or ammunition. (Lake, 2024) City of North Oaks The City of North Oaks has no provisions in Section 151.050 that would restrict a business that would be related to weapons, explosives, or ammunition. (Oaks, 2024) City of Shoreview The city of Shoreview has no provisions in Section 207.020 that would restrict a business that would be related to weapons, explosives, or ammunition. (Shoreview, 2024) City of Circle Pins The city of Circle Pines has no provisions outlined in Section 1305.01 Subdivision 42 that restricts a business for being related to weapons, explosives, and ammunition (Pines, 2024) References Blaine, C. o. (2024). Municipal Code Online. Retrieved from https://library.municode.com/mn/blaine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIIIBLZOOR _CH33PEST_33.10HOOC Columbus, C. o. (2024). Colimbus, MN Code of Ordinance. Retrieved from American Legal: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/columbusmn/latest/columbus_mn/0-0-0-1428 Hugo, C. o. (2024). Hugo City Code. Retrieved from Municode: https://library.municode.com/mn/hugo/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH90Z OLAUS_ARTVIRESPUSPEST_DIV1GE_S90-232HOOC Lake, C. o. (2024). City of White Bear Lake Full Code. Retrieved from https://www.whitebearlake.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/administration/page/165 1/0_full_code.pdf Lakes, C. o. (2024). Code Library. Retrieved from https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/linolakes/latest/linolakes_mn/0-0-0- 21175#JD_1007.056 Oaks, C. o. (2024). North Oaks City Ordinances. Retrieved from North Oaks Minnesota: https://www.northoaksmn.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif5416/f/uploads/title_xv_15_- _land_usage.pdf Pines, C. o. (2024). City Code of Ordinances. Retrieved from Circle Pines Minnesota: https://www.ci.circle-pines.mn.us/vertical/sites/%7BEF567A3D-21B2-43D8-AD9B- EC198D426DD6%7D/uploads/(13)_CITY_CODE_CHAPTER_THIRTEEN_ZONING.pdf Shoreview, C. o. (2024). City Code. Retrieved from Shoreview: https://www.shoreviewmn.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/14/638265691503370000 From:Connor Mattioli To:Katie Larsen Subject:Re: October 7, 2024 – City Council Work Session Agenda and Staff Report – ZOTA Home Occupation Permits Date:Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:47:55 PM Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Good Afternoon, Katie; thank you for sending this update! I have a question, as I am not completely satisfied with the verbiage of the amendment andwhat is going forward, as it is unclear. Currently, as this proposal is continuing, this provisionwould not allow me to test any firearm I manufacture since I would not be able to work withammunition. I believe what the zoning board was mainly concerned with was themanufacturing of ammunition; would it be possible to consider having the text read thefollowing to clarify this provision? 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food forservice on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, or manufacturingof ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall bepermitted as a home occupation. The main reason for this concern would be, as a private citizen, would it be permissible to takea firearm that I manufacture to a range and test it? If so, why would I be able to do this withoutbeing covered by my business insurance? Or would the testing of any firearm, unless sold to aprivate party, not be allowed even at a legal firing range? To summarize, my main question is, would it be possible to have this text addition consideredbefore the end of this amendment at this point, or would I need to wait until the proposedchange has finished and then submit a subsequent amendment proposal? Thank you in advance,Connor Mattioli 1st Reading: Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 13-24 ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 1007 RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council finds that the zoning ordinance text amendment protects the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare of the residents of the community. Section 2. Amendment. The Lino Lakes City Code Chapter 1007 is hereby amended as follows: • City Code Section 1007.056(6)(a): 14. No motor vehicle repair, paint or body work; commercial preparation of food for service on the premise; business related to or involving explosives, or ammunition or weapons; or ambulance or related emergency services shall be permitted as a home occupation. Section 3. Effect This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ____ day of ________________, 2024. BY: ____________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner WORK SESSION DATE: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Natures Refuge North Revised PUD Concept Plan Review ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND REVIEW DEADLINE: Complete Application Date: August 12, 2024 60-Day Deadline: October 11, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: August 28, 2024 Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: October 7, 2024 City Council Meeting: N/A The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, originally submitted a land use application for PUD Concept Plan (“concept plan”) review in October 2023. The concept plan was reviewed by the City’s Advisory Boards and City Council. The applicant has now submitted a revised concept plan based on public, staff, Board and Council comments for additional review and comment. The development contains 2 parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres. It is located north of Natures Refuge and is called Natures Refuge North. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Narrative prepared by M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul dated August 12, 2024 • Revised Concept Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated July 22, 2024 ANALYSIS 2 The November 8, 2023 Planning & Zoning staff report and December 4, 2023 Council Work Session staff report provide detailed background information and PUD discussion on the project. This staff report will provide a comparison of the 2 concept plans. The attached applicant’s narrative also provided additional information. Comparison The following table provides a comparison of the 2 concept plans. October 2023 PUD Concept Plan July 2024 Revised PUD Concept Plan 80ft wide Single Family Lots 9 0 65ft wide Single Family Lots 39 0 50ft wide Single Family Villa Lots 60 0 60ft wide Single Family Villa Lots 0 92 Total Housing Units 108 92 Buffer from Arena Acres 50ft 160-400 ft Open Space 30 acres (51%) 34 acres (58%) Tree Removal (approx.) 4,700 3,300 Net Density (units per acre) 2.41 2.03 Density Per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan the site is guided for low density sewered residential development which requires 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density is 2.03 units per acre which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s guided land use and density range. The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Oct 2023 July 2024 Gross Area (acres) 59.30 59.30 Wetlands & Water Bodies (6.05) (5.63) Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 3 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (3.45) (3.42) Other (Wetland Buffer Area) (4.91) (4.83) Net Area (acres) 44.89 45.42 # of Units 108 92 Gross Density (units/acre) 1.82 1.55 Net Density (units/acre) 2.41 2.03 Zoning Requirements and Standards The property is currently zoned R-X, Rural Executive. The R-X zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to develop the site. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to allow for zoning flexibility. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Conventional Zoning Requirements vs. PUD Guidelines Per City Code Section 1007.024(4) for PUD, Planned Unit Development, the development guidelines for land guided low density residential development are either R-1, R-1X, or R-2. The following chart compares the R-2, Two Family Residential zoning requirements to the proposed development. Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Proposed Villa Lots PUD Flexibility Required? Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet 7,500 square feet No Minimum Lot Width (interior lot) 60 feet 60 feet No Minimum Lot Width (corner lot) 80 feet 70 feet Yes Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125-165 feet No Minimum Front Setback 25 feet 25 feet No Minimum Side Setback 10 feet (5 feet for Attached Garage) 7.5 feet Yes 4 Minimum Corner Side Setback 25 feet 20 feet Yes Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet No Impervious Surface 65% Further review needs to be done to assess if we will be asking for flexibility on this with the Preliminary PUD application. TBD Collector Road Right- of-Way Width 80 feet 60 feet Yes (consistent with Natures Refuge) Garage Size Minimum 20 feet in width and 520 square feet in size 19.5 feet in width and 400 square feet in size Yes Garage Design Garage shall not protrude forward of the front wall of the house, unless the house includes a front porch that is unenclosed, a minimum of six (6) feet in depth, and extends across 100 percent of the front façade of the house. The garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch. Applicant is requesting this be waived. Yes Garage Design The length of the garage wall facing the street shall not be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front façade of the structure Garage walls shall not be greater than 55 percent of the length of the entire front façade. Yes 5 for street-facing garage doors Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. Building Design Standards The chart above and applicant’s narrative details the requested flexibility from the City’s building design standards. 1. Garage sizes = 400sf < 520sf 2. Garage width = 19.5ft < 20ft 3. Garage forward of house 4. Length of garage wall = 55% > 50% structure facade In discussions with the applicant, they stated there may be opportunities to offer buyers the option to construct larger, wider garages. The applicant narrative also includes 4 example elevations of the villa homes. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development contains 92 single family lots and 4 outlots. The outlots contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Staff Comments: 1. Staff recommends proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. Streets and Alleys 6 Haywood Drive is identified as a minor collector road in the Transportation Plan and provides a north-south corridor from CSAH 14 (Main Street) to eventually Pine Street. All proposed street right-of-way widths are 60ft and the paved surface appears to be 32ft wide. The connection of Street C to Andall Street shall be evaluated. Arena Acres was platted in 1981 and a 60ft wide Outlot B was platted for future road connection to the east. This outlot is owned by the City. The extension will connect the neighborhoods and transportation system. This standard transportation practice has been implemented throughout the City such as the Saddle Club connection to Fox Road and the St. Clair Estates connection to Hokah Drive and Sioux Lane. The Andall Street connection is supported by Lino Lakes Public Safety-Police Division and Fire Division in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response to the entire area. The connection is also supported by Public Works to provide better efficiency for street maintenance and snow plowing. This street connection is further supported by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.096 LAND REQUIREMENTS. (2) Proposed subdivisions shall be coordinated with surrounding properties and/or neighborhoods so that the city as a whole may develop efficiently and harmoniously. § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. Staff Comments: 1. The maximum length of a cu-de-sac shall be 500 feet, measured from the centerline of the street of origin to the end of the right-of-way. a) Street B shall be evaluated. 2. A temporary turn around will be required at the north end of Street A. 3. A traffic study shall be required. 4. Trails and sidewalks shall be incorporated throughout the development. Easements 7 Staff Comments: 1. Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. 3. Oversized easements for stormwater management may not be included in the minimum established lot size. 4. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The concept plan shows several stormwater management facilities, ponds, and wetlands throughout the development creating a multi-functional greenway corridor. Utilities Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. Water and sanitary will extend north along Haywood Drive. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub-district 2K). Flow is collected southward to MCES Meter M211 and Gravity Interceptor 8361 along North Road which passes southwest through Circle Pines. PID# 05-31-22-42-0003 is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and PID#05-31-22-13- 0001 is located in 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the one (1) parcel from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025). Municipal sanitary sewer and water also gets extended closer the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the City’s 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan, this development is within the Arena Acres and Wollan Park service areas. Arena Acres is a smaller 1 acre neighborhood park. Wollan’s Park is an 18 acre open space wetland and not an active park. The Plan indicates a Future Neighborhood Park centrally located within the service area. 8 The Park Board reviewed the concept plan on November 1, 2023. The Board recommended a 100% cash dedication in lieu of dedicating land for a neighborhood park. The cash dedication could be utilized for trails, providing leisure opportunities at Lino Lakes Elementary, and making enhancements to Arena Acres Park. Staff Comments: 1. The multi-functional greenway corridor shall incorporate more trails and open space into the development. The trail shall extend through Outlot C and eventually connect to Andall Street. 2. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30ft wide. Tree Preservation and Landscaping A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted. Additional landscaping may be required as a condition of the PUD. Conservation Development Per City Code Section 1007.007: Subdivision Ordinance Definitions CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT. The development pattern and technique whereby lots are arranged in closely related groups to preserve the natural amenities of the land through the creation of common open space. Natures Refuge North is a proposed conservation development. The villa lots preserve woodland and wetland areas, create more protected accessible public open space and establishes the greenway corridor. The trail system is also incorporated into the greenway system vs. along the street creating a more enjoyable, safer, and valued recreational experience. The purpose of using the PUD zoning is to create a conservation development that establishes the defined public values of preserving and enhancing the on-site natural resources. The PUD also creates and enhances the greenway corridor and trails that are accessible to the public. Environmental Review Record As previously noted, in 2006 a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the original Natures Refuge concept because the proposed 278 housing units exceeded the 250 housing unit threshold. The EAW thoroughly analyzed potential impacts to 9 wetlands, rare plant and animal species, floodplain, water quality, noise, traffic and archeology. It was determined the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects and the Council passed Resolution No. 07-06 making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an EIS. The scope and size of the existing Natures Refuge and revised Natures Refuge North (152 housing units on 155 gross acres) is smaller than the original 2006 proposal (278 housing units on 232 gross acres). A revised EAW is not required because the 152 housing units do not exceed the 250 housing unit threshold. # Lots Acres Natures Refuge 60 95 Natures Refuge North 92 60 TOTAL 152 155 Wetlands Per the Wetland Delineation Report, thirteen (13) wetlands were delineated on site totaling 7.17 acres. As shown on Concept Plan F: October 2023 July 2024 Total Wetlands 7.17 acres 7.17 acres Total Wetland Impacts 1.14 acres 1.62 acres Wetland Buffer (Ave. 50ft) 4.24 acres 4.48 acres Wetland Buffer (10ft min.) 1.32 acres 0.34 acres Some of the delineated wetlands are in the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Wetland Management Corridor. Wetlands preserved on site will have to meet RCWD and City buffer requirements. Impacts will require mitigation and will be reviewed by RCWD. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland District The site is not located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District. 10 Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety The Police Division supports connection to Andall Street. The connection is important for public safety response to and from the development. The Fire Division also supports the Andall Street connection to improve response times to the entire area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the revised PUD concept plan on August 28, 2024. Their comments are provided in the attached memo dated August 29, 2024. Park Board The Park Board reviewed the concept plan on November 1, 2023. The Board recommended a 100% cash dedication in lieu of dedicating land for a neighborhood park. The cash dedication could be utilized for trails, providing leisure opportunities at Lino Lakes Elementary, and making enhancements to Arena Acres Park. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the revised concept plan September 11, 2024. Two neighborhood residents spoke during public comment and do not want Andall Street connected. Board comments include: • No garage forward of house. • Porch forward of house/garage okay • General consensus to connect Andall Street • Increased buffers good • Mixed comments on garage sizes • Mixed comments on all villas but general appreciation the revised plan provides more open space and has less tree impacts City Engineer 11 The City Engineer provided comments in the attached memo. PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. A land use application for PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be required. The developer should have a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of a PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The need for a formal master plan was not identified for this area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the 2006 EAW concept plan for low density single family residential conservation development. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The applicant is proposing a conservation development. The villas provide a housing option with main-level living with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. 12 The conservation development preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics by minimizing wetland, woodland, and rare plant species impacts. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The revised plan shifts the villas to the east and creates a 160-400 buffer along the west lot line near the existing Arena Acres neighborhood. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. The configuration of the lots preserve as many wetlands as possible and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally which results in a smaller network of utilities and streets. (f) Mix of land use types. There is no mix of land use types. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The villas provide a housing option with main-level living with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. • Planning District 2 identifies Woolan Park as a natural resource that should be protected. The proposed development strategically includes a stormwater pond/open space buffer near the Woolan Park wetland complex. • A goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to provide service and capacity to developed areas of the city currently served by on-site systems. Municipal sanitary sewer and water also gets extended north which will eventually serve the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. • A goal of the Parks, Greenways & Trails Plan is to established greenway corridors. A multi-functional greenway corridor incorporating stormwater management, trails and open space is established with the development. Summary Public Benefit Gained: 13 1. Conservation development that protects and enhances the on-site natural resources such as wetlands, woodlands, rare plant species, and open space that are accessible to the general public. 2. Main-level living villa homes with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. 3. Preserved wetlands and established wetland buffers/conservation easements 4. Orderly transition from existing large lot single family Arena Acres neighborhood to smaller single family detached lots. 5. Efficient use of land resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets 6. Protection of Woolan Park wetland complex. 7. Extension of sanitary sewer to eventually serve Olive and Orange Street neighborhood currently served by on-site systems. 8. Establish multi-functional greenway corridor and trail system that is accessible to the public. 9. More parkland dedication fees collected. Flexibility Provided: 1. Corner Lot Width = 70ft < 80ft 2. Side Setbacks = 7.5ft < 10ft 3. Corner Lot Setback = 20ft < 25ft 4. Collector Road right-of-way = 60ft < 80ft 5. Garage sizes = 400sf < 520sf 6. Garage width = 19.5ft < 20ft 7. Garage forward of house 8. Length of garage wall = 55% > 50% structure facade REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff is requesting feedback from the City Council: 1. Are there other Benefits Gained or Flexibility Provided? 2. Thoughts on requested PUD flexibility? ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant Narrative 2. October 2023-Concept Plan A with Aerial 3. October 2023-Wetland Buffer Exhibit 4. July 2024-Revised Concept Plan F with Aerial 14 5. July 2024-Revised Concept Plan F with Wetland Buffers 6. City Engineer Memo dated September 4, 2024 7. Environmental Memo dated August 29, 2024 REVISED CONCEPT PLAN NATURES REFUGE NORTH 8/12/2024 Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 1 INTRODUCTION M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (M/I Homes) is submitting an application for a revised concept plan for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for land north of Natures Refuge. The original concept plan, with 108 proposed single-family and villa lots on an approximately 59.30-acre site, was reviewed by the City at its Planning Commission meeting on November 8, 2023 and City Council meeting on December 4, 2023. The revised concept plan proposes 92 villa lots. The revised plan accomplishes the following: 1. Approximately 8.5 acres of open space adjacent to the Arena Acres neighborhood. 2. Approximately 34 acres of open space to be preserved in perpetuity as public park or private open space, as determined by the City. 3. A neighborhood plan and homes designed for empty nesters and seniors looking for single level living with association maintenance. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT We are requesting a PUD for this development to introduce a villa home option to the Natures Refuge neighborhood. Villa homes offer single level living and provide a low maintenance living option for older adults. Natures Refuge, to the south of this proposed neighborhood, has 80-foot-wide lots with traditional single-family homes. This neighborhood is proposed to include all slab on grade 60-foot-wide villa lots with main-level living with association-maintained yards and snow removal. The City of Lino Lakes allows for development through a PUD if it results in public benefit as outlined in the City’s PUD ordinance. Nature Refuge North provides the following public benefits: • Addressing growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. o The single level living provided by villa homes include association-maintained yards and snow removal and therefore are popular with our senior buyers who are looking for a low maintenance home. It is not financially feasible to offer association-maintained yards and snow removal in the current neighborhood given the size of the lots. o The configuration of the lots works to preserve as many wetlands and trees as possible, and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally. • Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. As mentioned, the site design preserves over half the acreage in open space, which preserves as many wetlands and trees as possible. We believe the general requirements for a PUD are met in the following ways: • Public or common open space to meet minimum requirements established in the ordinance. The site provides approximately 34 acres of open space. • If PUD includes preservation of natural habitat, those habitats shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement. We have preserved approximately 57% open space within the site in order to preserve natural habitat. We are proposing to deed these outlots to the City as permanent open space to be preserved in perpetuity as public park. If the City elects not to accept the land as parkland, the HOA will own the land. Deed restrictions or restrictive covenants will preserve the land as open space. • Homeowners Association Required. The lots will be governed by a homeowner’s association (HOA) as further explained below. Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 2 SITE PLAN There are four proposed street connections. One connecting from the south from Natures Refuge via Haywood Drive and connecting to future development to the north, one to the west to Arena Acres, and one to the east for future development. If the City desires, M/I Homes would be open to other options to provide connections to Andall Street. The proposed development has a total of 92 60-foot-wide villa lots. The following table compares the proposed standards to the Two Family Residential (R-2) zoning district. The site is currently zoned Rural Executive (R-X). Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Villa Lots Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet 7,500 square feet Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125 feet Minimum Front Setback 25 feet 25 feet* Minimum Side Setback 10 feet (5 feet for Attached Garage) 7.5 feet***** Minimum Corner Side Setback 25 feet 20 feet Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet Impervious Surface 65% Further review needs to be done to assess if we will be asking for flexibility on this with the Preliminary PUD application. Collector Road Right-of-Way Width 80 feet 60 feet* Garage Size Minimum 20 feet in width and 520 square feet in size 19.5 feet in width and 400 square feet in size** Garage Design Garage shall not protrude forward of the front wall of the house, unless the house includes a front porch that is unenclosed, a minimum of six (6) feet in depth, and extends across 100 percent of the front façade of the house. The garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch. We are requesting this be waived. *** Garage Design The length of the garage wall facing the street shall not be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front façade of the structure for street-facing garage doors Garage walls shall not be greater than 55 percent of the length of the entire front façade.**** *This flexibility was granted for Natures Refuge. Haywood Drive from Natures Refuge was granted this flexibility, and the proposed development will extend Haywood Drive to the north. This flexibility is being requested for both Haywood Drive and Street A. Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 3 **This was previously requested with the original concept plan. The Homeowners Association (HOA) establishes rules and regulations prohibiting the use of garages solely for storage and requires parking of at least one automobile in the garage and that trailers and other recreational equipment be kept in garages when not in use. Additionally, many of our villa plans have storage in the attics above the garages for additional storage. ***Our homes provide enhanced architectural features that allow for visual interest throughout the community, and we offer a wide variety of materials and colors to break up the façade. Further, this is an extension of the existing Natures Refuge, and we want to create a cohesive neighborhood. Most of our plans are not garage forward, and the garage protrudes less than six feet beyond the front façade. The Watermark development was granted similar flexibility with their garages. ****We are requesting this because we have anti-monotony standards that ensure a wide variety of elevations that result in pleasing streetscapes. The garage doors will be decorative and have a strip of windows. *****We will provide at least 15 feet between homes. The City currently allows a five-foot setback for garages, so this is consistent with R-2 zoning. DENSITY The total site area is 59.30 acres with 5.63 acres of wetlands and 4.83 acres of wetland buffers. The planned density for this area is 1.6-3 units per acre. Netting out wetlands and wetland buffers, we are proposing a density of 1.88 units per acre, well below the maximum-allowed density. PUD flexibility and the R-2 zoning lot standards are necessary to meet the minimum density allowed in the City’s Comprehensive Plan and to minimize tree removal. It is not possible to meet the minimum density with 80-foot lots given the wetlands and their required buffers, as well as the gas line easement. With this site plan, 80-foot lots would yield 67 lots as shown in the Yield Plan Density Exhibit, which would result in a density of 1.37 units per acre, which is well below the minimum density planned for this area. Furthermore, these lots would result in greater tree removal. CHANGES SINCE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CONCEPT PLAN The following changes were made from the previously submitted site plan: • The number of lots has been reduced from 108 to 92. • The buffer from Arena Acres has been significantly increased from 50 feet to over 160 feet at its narrowest, increasing to almost 400 feet to the north of Street C. • Open space was increased from just under 30 acres to over 34 acres (increasing from approximately 50% to approximately 57% of the total area of the site). • There are significantly less trees being removed. The previous layout required removal of 4,702 trees, and this revised layout has reduced that number by approximately 1,400 trees down to 3,309. TREE PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE As mentioned above, we have designed our neighborhood plan to conserve as many trees as possible. Of the 6,494 trees on the site, we are saving 3,185 trees: almost 50%. We are proposing to preserve these trees in permanent open space to be dedicated to the City for public park, or as open space to be owned by the HOA. Given the extensive dedication of open space/park for permanent tree preservation, we are requesting that the City accept the land dedication and tree preservations areas in lieu of paying tree restitution. As part of this request, M/I Homes will agree to plant three trees per home for a total tree replacement of 276 trees. Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 4 We are proposing this for a number of reasons. First, the proposed plan preserves a little over 57% open space, conserving as many trees as possible. This is a heavily wooded site that is guided for a density of 1.6- 3 units per acre, and we are proposing a very low density, almost near the lowest density allowed. Additionally, almost 50% of the trees on site are Quaking Aspen, which do not survive long due to Cankers, which will kill the trees in 3-8 years. Finally, we have received extensive feedback from the residents of Arena Acres regarding the preservation of trees on this land. The dedication of public land would allow them to enjoy this land and the trees that are being preserved. If the City chooses not to accept the land dedication, an alternative option would be to place a deed restriction on the open space area prohibiting the removal of trees, and the land would be left in its natural state. The HOA would own the open space property. ELEVATIONS Example elevations of our villa product have been provided. These are just an example of the many elevations we offer. We also have anti-monotony requirements to ensure that very similar elevations are not adjacent to one another within the community to preserve visual interest. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS The development will have an HOA that will provide for the maintenance of the overall common elements in the community, including landscaping of the common areas as applicable and management of the natural resources. The HOA will also provide lawn care and snow removal for villa lots. Additionally, restrictions will be placed on outdoor storage and parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) in order to keep the community looking orderly and well maintained. REQUEST AND CONCLUSIONS M/I Homes is requesting Board and City Council feedback and direction on the proposed revised concept plan. We believe that the revised concept plan proposes a reasonable use of the property in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. We respectfully request that the City Council provide direction and support of the revised concept plan with the following considerations: 1. The future PUD and neighborhood plan allow for 92 villa lots consistent with the attached concept plan. 2. The minimum lot width requirements conform to the R-2 zoning except as identified in the PUD. 3. In lieu of tree restitution, the City agrees to accept the approximately 34 acres of open space for tree preservation provided that M/I Homes plant a minimum of 3 trees on each lot. 4. The open space property be deeded to the City as park land for the preservation of the open space and wetland, in perpetuity. As an alternative, the open space property can be owned by the HOA and protected by deed restrictions or restrictive covenants. Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 5 E XAMPLE ELEVATIONS – VILLAS The Willow The Cedarwood Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Submittal Page 6 Elmwood Aspen WET L A N D WETL A N D WET L A N D W E T L A N D WE T L A N D WETLAND WETL A N D WETLAND 2 3456 7 8 9 101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819202122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3940 41 4243 44 45 46 4748 1 38 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 7273747576 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91939495 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105106 WTLD WTLD WTL D 107108 92 18 EX. WETLAND WETLA N D WE T L A N D WETL A N D WETLAND STR E E T A R E V I E W C O P Y of CO N C E P T P L A N A W/ A R I A L REVISIONS 3. 10/13/2023 Revise layout. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: NA T U R E S R E F U G E N O R T H Li n o L a k e s , M i n n e s o t a f: \ j o b s \ 5 4 0 1 - 5 4 2 0 \ 5 4 1 2 - 0 3 - n a t u r e s r e f u g e n o r t h \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ l a y o u t s \ 5 4 1 2 . 0 3 l a y o u t 3 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 1 3 / 2 3 FILE NO:XXX 2 2 POND ST R E E T C STREET D STREET B ST R E E T E ANDALL STREET POND POND POND M/ I H O M E S O F MI N N E A P O L I S , L L C 53 5 4 P a r k d a l e D r i v e , # 1 0 0 St . L o u i s P a r k , M N 5 5 4 1 6 HAYWO O D D R I V E C# 08/28/2023 1. 09/14/2023 Revise layout. G A S L I N E E A S E M E N T P R O P O S E D 1 0 0 ' 2. 10/02/2023 Revise layout. SITE DATA NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION WET L A N D WETL A N D WET L A N D W E T L A N D WE T L A N D WETLAND WETL A N D WETLAND 2 3456 7 8 9 101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819202122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3940 41 4243 44 45 46 4748 1 38 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 7273747576 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91939495 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105106 WTLD WTLD WTL D 107108 92 18 EX. WETLAND WETLA N D WE T L A N D WETL A N D WETLAND SITE DATA STR E E T A R E V I E W C O P Y of REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: C# 10/03/2023 f: \ j o b s \ 5 4 0 1 - 5 4 2 0 \ 5 4 1 2 - 0 3 - n a t u r e s r e f u g e n o r t h \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ l a y o u t s \ 5 4 1 2 . 0 3 l a y o u t 3 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 0 3 / 2 3 FILE NO:XXX 1 1 POND NOTES ST R E E T C STREET D STREET B ST R E E T E ANDALL STREET POND POND POND WE T L A N D B U F F E R E X H I B I T NA T U R E S R E F U G E N O R T H Li n o L a k e s , M i n n e s o t a M/ I H O M E S O F MI N N E A P O L I S , L L C 53 5 4 P a r k d a l e D r i v e , # 1 0 0 St . L o u i s P a r k , M N 5 5 4 1 6 HAYWO O D D R I V E G A S L I N E E A S E M E N T P R O P O S E D 1 0 0 ' WETLAND SUMMARY WET L A N D WETL A N D WET L A N D W E T L A N D WE T L A N D WETLAND WETL A N D WETLAND WTLD WTLD WTL D EX. WETLAND WETLA N D WE T L A N D W E T L A N D WETLAND WTL D 2 34567 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 1617 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26272829 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 80 79 78 1 38 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62616059 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 77 30 18 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT D R E V I E W C O P Y of CO N C E P T P L A N F W/ A R I A L REVISIONS 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: NA T U R E S R E F U G E N O R T H Li n o L a k e s , M i n n e s o t a f: \ j o b s \ 5 4 0 1 - 5 4 2 0 \ 5 4 1 2 - 0 3 - n a t u r e s r e f u g e n o r t h \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ l a y o u t s \ 5 4 1 2 . 0 3 c p t p l a n f . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 07 / 1 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:XXX 2 2 ANDALL STREET POND M/ I H O M E S O F MI N N E A P O L I S , L L C 53 5 4 P a r k d a l e D r i v e , # 1 0 0 St . L o u i s P a r k , M N 5 5 4 1 6 HAYWO O D D R I V E C# 07/11/2024 1. G A S L I N E E A S E M E N T P R O P O S E D 1 0 0 ' 2. STR E E T A STREET B STREET A H A Y W O O D D R I V E NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION POND POND LIFT STATION PROPOSED TRAIL PROPOSED TR A I L SITE DATA ST R E E T C WET L A N D WETL A N D WET L A N D W E T L A N D WE T L A N D WETLAND WETL A N D WETLAND WTLD WTLD WTL D EX. WETLAND WETLA N D WE T L A N D W E T L A N D WETLAND WTL D 2 34567 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 1617 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26272829 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 80 79 78 1 38 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62616059 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 77 30 18 ±16 ±2 4 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT D STR E E T A R E V I E W C O P Y of REVISIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: C# 07/11/2024 f: \ j o b s \ 5 4 0 1 - 5 4 2 0 \ 5 4 1 2 - 0 3 - n a t u r e s r e f u g e n o r t h \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ l a y o u t s \ 5 4 1 2 . 0 3 c p t p l a n f . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 07 / 1 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:XXX 2 1 POND STREET B STREET A ANDALL STREET POND CO N C E P T P L A N F NA T U R E S R E F U G E N O R T H Li n o L a k e s , M i n n e s o t a M/ I H O M E S O F MI N N E A P O L I S , L L C 53 5 4 P a r k d a l e D r i v e , # 1 0 0 St . L o u i s P a r k , M N 5 5 4 1 6 HAYWO O D D R I V E G A S L I N E E A S E M E N T P R O P O S E D 1 0 0 ' SITE DATA NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION H A Y W O O D D R I V E WETLAND SUMMARY POND LIFT STATION PROPOSED TRAIL PROPOSED TR A I L ST R E E T C 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: September 4, 2024 Re: Natures Refuge North Concept Plan Review 023898-000 WSB’s review of the Concept Plans for the Natures Refuge North development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Carlson McCain and received August 12, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Natures Refuge North Concept Plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated July 11, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Natures Refuge North Addition is the second phase of the overall Natures Refuge development which includes 60 acres north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of CSAH 23 (Lake Street) and east of Wood Duck Trail. The current conceptual project proposes 92 villa lots and associated infrastructure. This property was originally part of a larger development of which an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared. The evaluation concluded that the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects. • Grading The Natures Refuge North Addition includes site grading for the 92 units as well as extensions of Haywood Drive and three local streets that are yet to be named. • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Natures Refuge North Addition has not yet been proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the development will include a storm sewer conveyance, rear yard drainage, and ponding systems, consistent with the original Natures Refuge development. The systems shall meet the City’s and Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) Stormwater Management requirements. Options should be explored to consolidate stormwater facilities with the original Natures Refuge ponding if feasible as well as stormwater reuse throughout the development for irrigation. Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04/2024 Page 2 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review • Water Supply The City’s water supply system well firm capacity should meet or exceed its maximum day demand. This criteria is currently constrained by poor water quality in some wells, the White Bear Lake court orders and ongoing litigation, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors. Based on the water supply capacity and well trigger analysis completed in April 2024, excluding Well No. 2 due to poor water quality, if the City is able to add Well No. 7 then the system could serve approximately 7,300 households (about 1,400 households more than the existing 5,900 households) before Well No. 8 is needed. The final number of available households will need to be determined as the project progresses. The City has begun conversations with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) about permitting Well No. 7 and is awaiting confirmation whether it can be constructed at this time given the ongoing White Bear Lake litigation. Applicant to verify water pressure is adequate for all locations within the development. The watermain may need to be looped through the site, and the watermain will need to include a 12-inch diameter trunk watermain as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. All proposed units are required to be on the municipal water supply. Water infrastructure for the Natures Refuge North Addition has not yet been designed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the existing 16” DIP trunk main on Haywood Drive will need to be extended north through the development to the eastern boundary similar to what is shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A 12” stub will need to be extended to the west towards Arena Acres and Andall Street. Otherwise, the development will include a water system with predominately 8- inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot, consistent with the original Natures Refuge development. Water supply will need to be evaluated in conjunction with current pending DNR water appropriation approvals. • Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Natures Refuge North Addition has not yet been proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the existing 10- inch diameter poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) trunk main on Haywood Drive will be extended north to serve a portion of the proposed addition. The remainder of the addition will need to be evaluated by the applicant as to whether a lift station as shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan is necessary. If necessary, the lift station will need to be oversized to accommodate the remaining sanitary sewer district 2K and a portion of 2A. Oversizing costs for the lift station will be credited by the City. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with 4-inch Schedule 40 PVC service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the west, north, and east. The proposed sanitary sewer is consistent with the with the original Natures Refuge development. • Transportation A general street layout has been proposed with the Concept Plan. The City of Lino Lakes’ Comprehensive Plan requires neighborhood street connections The applicant is showing Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04/2024 Page 3 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review a connection with right of way to Andall Street in the westerly Arena Acres neighborhood. The City’s Engineering and Public Safety departments submit that the roadway connection to Andall Street shall be constructed as feasible. The roads stubbed to the north and east development limits will need to be evaluated for feasibility with future connections and potential wetland impacts. The Pine Oaks Addition, that will be connected to on the east side of this proposed development, has been previously platted but, is anticipated that it would likely be replatted, as many of the conditions and requirements have changed. A traffic study will be required and reviewed with the preliminary plat. Trails and sidewalks A trail is proposed extending from the south end of the development at the connection with Natures Refuge, to the north end of the development and branching west to one of the new streets. No trails nor sidewalks are shown along any of the streets on the submitted Concept Plan. Additional trail and sidewalk segments may need to be included throughout the site at the direction of the City Planner. • Wetlands and Environment The project proposes approximately 1.62 acres of wetland impact. A wetland replacement plan will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through RCWD and the City. Review of the DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System database indicates the potential presence of several protected species within and near the project area, including protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for additional studies or surveys. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. Any disturbed buffer areas should be seeded with a seed mix containing native, non-invasive, species. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Natures Refuge North Addition has not yet been submitted. One will need to be submitted and reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The Natures Refuge North Addition does not impact the existing floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features • Development Agreement Ms. Katie Larsen 09/04/2024 Page 4 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Natures Refuge North Addition will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Borrow areas / Lakes area will be maintained by the HOA. • Permits Required Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.  Page 1 To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Date: August 29, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments - Natures Refuge North Environmental Board had the following comments at their August 28, 2024 meeting: 1. Consideration should be given to the M/I proposal to retain permanent open space in lieu of tree mitigation subject to the 3 trees per lot requirement. 2. Open area landscape requirements be adhered to in areas around stormwater and borrow ponds. 3. A new rare plant and animal survey must be completed for the project area. 4. If rare species are found on site, design layout should be revised to avoid impacts to these species. 5. If rare species are found on site and impacts are unavoidable, include features that minimize impacts (ex: buffers around rare plant locations for any that can be preserved, surmountable curbs to facilitate Blanding’s turtle movement, restoration of undisturbed project areas). DNR permits may be required for any impacts to rare species. 6. Coordinate with the Rare Plant Rescue group (contact Carrie Taylor at Anoka Conservation District) to allow for transport of any rare plants for which impact is unavoidable to a donor site, such as Wollan’s Park Wetland Bank in Lino Lakes. 7. A final tree survey and inventory must be completed. 8. Tree protection zones in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail must be shown for all trees that are being preserved. These zones must be shown on the Tree Preservation Plan and Grading Plans submitted at the Preliminary Plat phase. 9. Consider extension of trails into the area abutting Andall Street. 10. Consider incorporation of a stormwater reuse system for lawn irrigation. Environmental Memo  Page 2 11. Haywood Drive should be adjusted to minimize potential wetland impacts to the east of the site. Street location entering the site should be shifted to minimize tree impact if possible. 12. Proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a Conservation Easement granted to the City. 13. The Board expressed concern with the wetland and tree impacts associated with extension of Street C to Andall Street. The Board suggested that the street right of way be dedicated to preserve corridor for future use, if necessary, but don’t construct the street with the development. 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner WORK SESSION DATE: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan Review ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND Review Deadline: Complete Application Date: August 19, 2024 60-Day Deadline: October 18, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: September 25, 2024 Park Board Meeting: September 4, 2024 EDAC Meeting: September 5, 2024 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: September 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: October 7, 2024 City Council Meeting: N/A The applicant, Wilkinson Waters LLC, is proposing a master planned development located on North Oaks Company Inc. property located south of County Road J/Ash Street/CSAH 32, west of Centerville Road/CSAH 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. The development contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 76 gross acres and consists of mix of residential housing types and commercial development. The proposed development is called Wilkinson Waters. The Land Use Application is for the following: • PUD Concept Plan/Concept Plan (“concept plan”) Future land use applications may include: • Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) • Rezone property from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development • PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 2 • PUD Final Plan/Final Plat This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Applicant Narrative prepared by ISG dated August 12, 2024 • Wilkinson Waters Development PUD Concept Plan prepared by ISG dated August 12, 2024 ANALYSIS History North Oaks Company PUD Concept Plan Review In September 2015, North Oaks Company LLC submitted a PUD Concept Plan for Advisory Board and Council review. The concept plan included two (2) parcels totaling 46 gross acres. It consisted of a residential mix of single family homes, twin homes, and senior housing rentals totaling 136-161 housing units. The proposed development did not meet density requirements and did not move forward. Current Proposal Please see the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed description of the project. Per the narrative, “The proposed land uses include 33,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) – three story 100 unit market rate multi-family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 34 for rent townhome units, 22 for sale townhome units, and one (1) – 100 unit senior living facility.” Residential The applicant is proposing the following mix and number of housing types: Housing Type # Units 4-plex Townhomes = (5 buildings) 20 6-plex Townhomes = (6 buildings) 36 Market Rate Multi-Family = (2 buildings x 100 units) 200 Senior Living Multi-Family = 100 3 356 The residential development transitions from townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and CSAH 32 (Ash Street) to the apartments adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road). The senior living building is also near Wilkinson Lakes. Trails, sidewalks and stormwater ponds are included throughout the development. Staff Comments: 1. Staff suggests moving the senior living building towards Centerville Road to better transition from low intense townhomes near the lake and wetlands to higher intense apartments near the arterial roads. 2. A stronger multi-functional greenway corridor with trails shall be created. Commercial The applicant is proposing approximately 4.1 acres of commercial development in the south east quadrant of the site adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) and Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. The concept plan shows three (3) commercial building pads (9,100-10,850sf footprint). Existing Conditions The predominant existing land use is agricultural. MLCCS classifications include cattail marsh, saturated altered/non-native dominated vegetation, grasslands, deciduous trees and agriculture. Soil types include hydric, predominantly hydric, predominately non-hydric and non-hydric. Wetlands and floodplain exist on the west portion of the site. Several utility easements bisect the site. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Low Density Residential South City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) East R-X, Rural Executive Rural Residential Permanent Rural 4 West R, Rural Agriculture Medium Density Comprehensive Plan Land Use The 76 acre site has multiple land use designations per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan: medium density, high density, and signature gateway. The areas are not intended to be strict land use and density boundaries but should be considered somewhat flexible in order to accommodate development. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is located in Planning District 4. The Comprehensive Plan states: Land Use • A gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning guide was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. Financing is now needed to implement the plan. • Planning District 4 includes one area designated Signature Gateway Area (Centerville Road/County Road J). o This site is located at the intersection of two county roads, near an I-35E interchange. The site is expected to develop as an extension of the multi-family and commercial development south of the municipal boundary in the City of North Oaks. Approximately 80 percent of the area is expected to accommodate residential development at 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre. The City Council may allow up to 15 units per acre for projects that meet specific city housing goals. It is important to note the 80/20 percent residential/commercial mix is related only to the 24 acres of land guided for Signature Gateway. These 24 acres could support 4.8 acres of commercial development (24 acres x 20% = 4.8 acres.) The proposed Wilkinson Waters development includes 4.1 acres of commercial which is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Infrastructure & Public Facilities • Recommended sanitary sewer improvements in this area are based on 5 connecting to the White Bear Township sewer in Centerville Road. Local sewers will discharge to at least two lift stations which will pump by force main to the White Bear Township facility. • The White Bear Township trunk sewer, constructed in the late 1980’s, has capacity to serve portions of North Oaks and Lino Lakes in addition to White Bear Township’s needs. North Oaks, by written agreement with White Bear Township, has purchased the right to use some of this capacity. The agreement has been modified, and North Oaks has made additional payments to the township as North Oaks’ service needs have increased. A review of the current utilization of this facility indicates that there is still capacity available to serve at least a portion of the projected development in District 4. However, no formal agreement exists between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township. It is recommended that the city commence negotiations with White Bear Township to secure the right to discharge to this facility. Negotiations will need to include both sanitary sewer and water supply. • Pursue a full interchange at I-35E and County Road J (Ash Street). Final design for the I-35E and CR J (Ash St) Interchange is underway with construction proposed for spring of 2025. • Work with Anoka County and Ramsey County to ensure appropriate access management on County Road J (Ash Street). MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway and access management improvement plans and financing for the I-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. These improvements are tentatively scheduled for 2025. Density For this development, density requirements are regulated by both the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and City Chapter 1102: Shoreland Management Overlay. Where the requirements are more or less restrictive, the more restrictive standards shall apply. In this case, it appears the 2040 Comprehensive Plan density requirements are more restrictive and shall be applied. 2040 Comprehensive Plan The following chart is a preliminary summary of the site’s general housing unit range and density using Met Council’s density formula: 6 The Signature Gateway district allows for up to 15 units per net acre if the project meets the City’s housing goals. These goals are provided in the attachments. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 206 to 348 housing units. The proposed 356 housing units exceeds the allowed the density range. Shoreland Management Overlay Ordinance City Code Section 1102.13(4) details Shoreland PUD density requirements. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 262 to 452 housing units. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan density requirements are more restrictive and shall be applied. Staff Comments: PID #34-31-22-43-0006 PID #34-31-22-44-0001 PID#34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 Southwest Parcel Northwest Parcel Middle Parcel East Parcel Total Gross Area (acres)15.20 15.14 19.96 25.59 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.20 10.90 7.92 0.00 34.02 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.93 3.74 4.67 Other (Undevelopable)0.00 0.49 1.22 5.40 7.11 Net Area (acres)0.00 3.75 9.89 16.45 30.09 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 6.0 to 8.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 15 59 132 206 High 0 23 79 165 266 High Range + Signature Gateway Max 15 upa 0 23 79 247 348 Proposed # Housing Units 356 Gross Density (units/acre)4.69 Net Density (units/acre)11.83 Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Signature Gateway Residential Use Net Area (acres) Net Area (sf) Lot Area Per Section 1102.13(4)(b) Range of Total # Housing Units Allowed Townhomes 30.09 1,310,720 5,000 262 Apartment 30.09 1,310,720 2,900 452 7 1. The applicant’s submittal does not appear to subtract out the 4.1 acres of commercial development. 2. Wetland buffers will also need to be subtracted which will change net density. 3. Net acreage will be re-calculated based on post-development during the preliminary plat process. 4. A Density Map that coincides with the Density Chart shall be created that clearly shows what areas are being netted out from the gross. 5. Does this project meet the housing goals to justify allowing for the 15 units per acre Signature Gateway bonus? a. Should the density bonus be required as affordable housing? Growth Management Strategy Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City’s Growth Management Strategy. The strategy works in conjunction with the City’s utility staging plan. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5-year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2023, the City’s average annual number of units is 118. This is less the allowed 230 unit annual allocation. With existing projects underway the project may need to be phased over multiple years to meeting growth management requirements. Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Medium Density, High Density, and Signature Gateway Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in having the property developed. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to allow for multi-family development in the shoreland district, zoning flexibility and create a mixed used development. 8 Shoreland District The subject property is located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. They are both classified as Natural Environment lakes. Multi- family apartments are only allowed in the shoreland district by PUD. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. These are detailed below and throughout this staff report. Open space requirements: At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. Per Sheet 14, Land Use Plan-Legend, there are approximately 59 acres of open space in the 76 acre development which equals 78% open space. Staff Comment: 1. Requirements of City Code Section 1102.13 Shoreland PUD shall be met. 2. Sheet 14, Land Use Plan: a. The data in the Legend and the Site Data shall match and total the same acres. b. Private Roadway is not considered open space. 3. Impervious surface coverage shall be calculated per lot compliant with Shoreland District 35% residential and 60% commercial maximum requirements. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. The purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be departed from to accomplish public value purposes. The proposed conventional zoning districts used for this project are R-4, High Density Residential for the townhomes and apartments and GB, General Business for the commercial. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Residential Lot Size and Width 9 The attached PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations Chart details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district and shoreland requirements. The chart also compares the proposed development to these guidelines. Overall, the proposed townhomes, senior living, and apartments appear to meet minimum R-4, High Density lot size and width requirements as detailed on the chart. PUD flexibility is not required for the residential lot sizes or width. Staff Comments: 1. Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. The minimum lot areas shall also consist of buildable land exclusive of oversized easements or buffers. 2. Lot sizes for the townhomes on Lot 1 need to be broken out. Setbacks The following chart compares the conventional R-4, High Density zoning ordinance and shoreland requirements to the proposed setbacks. Townhomes & Apartments City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW 40 ft (Arterial St) 30ft (Local St) 40 ft 30 ft No Private Street (Driveway Length) 25 ft 18 ft NA-25ft shall be met Private Street (Building Setback) 20ft (back of curb) 10 ft NA-20ft shall be met Rear Lot Line 30 ft 50 ft No Side Lot Line 20 ft 10 ft NA-20ft shall be met Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 450 ft No PUD flexibility is not required for the residential lot setbacks. Staff Comments: 10 1. City Code Section 1007.024(6) further details Urban Residential Planned Unit Development requirements in regards to municipal water and sanitary sewer services, density, open space, neighborhood performance standards and yards. The applicant shall demonstrate these requirements are met. 2. Townhome driveway lengths shall be a minimum 25ft. 3. A minimum 20-foot setback from private street for all buildings is required. 4. A minimum 20-foot wide buffer in compliance with § 1007.049 shall be required along Ash Street and Centerville Road. Commercial City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district Development Standards. The development proposes to use the GB, General Business zoning district as guidelines. Per City Code Section 1007.132 GB, General Business, GB Requirements Commercial Proposed Commercial PUD Flexibility Required? Min. Lot Size 20,000 sf 4.1 acres (base lot) No Min. Lot Width (base lot) 100 ft 682 ft No Min. Lot Depth No minimum NA NA Building Setback From Streets Centerville Rd (Arterial) 40 ft 40 ft No Local Streets 30 ft 30 ft No Private Streets 20 ft 60 ft No Rear Yard 30 ft NA NA Side Yard 10 ft NA NA Impervious Surface (Shoreland) 60% TBD TBD Lot size and setbacks appear to meet requirements. PUD flexibility is not required for the commercial development. 11 Staff Comments: 1. City Code Section 1007.024(7) details Commercial or Industrial Planned Unit Development in regards to municipal water and sanitary sewer services, open space, and design standards that shall be met. 2. Impervious surface data shall be provided for the entire development. 3. Does the Planning & Zoning Board support GB, General Business or NB, Neighborhood Business as the conventional zoning district? Yield Plan As required per City Code Section 1001.026(4), the applicant submitted the attached yield plan. The yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters. The submitted yield plan indicates 13 separate residential buildings with a total of 406 housing units and no commercial component. The proposed concept plan is 356 housing units. Building Design Standards and Other Performance Standards Building and architectural design standard review is not required at concept plan level. City Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential and commercial building design standard requirements. The conventional residential zoning districts also provide addition requirements. The applicant is requesting building design PUD flexibility for: 1. Maximum building height to be up to 40 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade surrounding a 3-story apartment building, or a maximum building height to be up to 48 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade surrounding a 4- story building (senior building). City Code Section 1007.114(8) of the R-4 District allows for a maximum building height of the greater of 3 stories or 40ft. City Code Section 1102.07(2)(c) of the Shoreland District allows for a maximum building height of 36ft. Height is measured as the average height of the highest gable or a pitch or hipped roof. 2. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments 12 with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code 1007.114 R-4(5). City Code Section 1007.114(4) of the R-4 District requires the minimum livable floor area for each multiple-family dwelling unit shall be 700 square feet plus 100 additional square feet for each bedroom. Staff Comment: 1. Performance standards (architecture, parking spaces, lighting, landscaping, etc.) will be fully evaluated in with the complete submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of residential and commercial lots and blocks. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Per City Code Section 1001.097 (1) Length. The maximum length of blocks shall be 1,500 feet and the minimum length 400 feet. Blocks over 900 feet long may require pedestrianways at least ten feet wide at their approximate center. Staff Comments: 1. A minimum 30-40ft wide pedestrianway/trail connection shall be made to Centerville Road, Ash Street, local public street and public open space. Streets and Alleys CSAH 32 (Ash Street) and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) are A-Minor Arterial Expander roads. Internal streets consist of local streets and private streets intended to serve the site. Sidewalks shall be provided along streets. MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway improvement plans and financing for the I-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. These improvements are tentatively scheduled for 2025. Staff Comments: 1. Private streets shall be a minimum of 26 ft wide back to back. 13 2. Private streets shall not exceed 300 ft in length. 3. Townhome driveway lengths shall be a minimum 25ft. 4. Townhome driveways shall not exit directly onto the local public street. 5. Sidewalk shall be installed on the east side of the local public street. 6. A traffic study shall be required. 7. A noise study shall be required. Easements Staff Comments: 1. Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. 3. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands, ditches, and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The concept plan shows four (4) stormwater ponds throughout the development. Staff Comments 1. A stronger multi-purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space shall be incorporated into the development. Utilities Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District (Sub-district 4A). Flows from this area are planned to be conveyed to the southeast through the White Bear Township sanitary sewer system. A joint powers agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township should be completed to ensure that this capacity remains available for Lino Lakes use. If capacity is not available to meet system requirements, the land use, staging, and sewer district service areas will need to be reevaluated. 14 The site is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). The two (2) easterly lots containing the residential and commercial development are within Utility Staging Area 1A. By resolution, the Council may move the two (2) other parcels from Stage 1B (2025- 2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025) but there is no development proposed in this area. The site is proposed to be served by White Bear Township’s municipal water system. The site provides opportunity to implement a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system should be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. The attached WSB City Engineer memo details additional information. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the September 4, 2024 Park Board staff report: Figure 10-2 of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as a Neighborhood Service area, with Neighborhood Park Area C conceptually located on the north side of Ash Street. With 356 residential units in this development and potentially more to the west in the future, the Park Board should consider designating a neighborhood park in this area. A minimum 30-40ft wide pedestrian way/trail connection should be made to Centerville Road, Ash Street, local public street and public open space. In addition, a multi-functional greenway corridor with trails should be created. Tree Preservation and Landscaping A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted. Additional landscaping may be required as a condition of the PUD. Staff Comments: 1. A berm and landscaping buffer will be required along the Centerville Road and Ash Street. 2. A noise study will be required with the PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. 3. Berm and/or any noise mitigation requirements shall be measured from side or rear yard ground elevations to top of berm or fence. Environmental Review Record 15 An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) will be required. The threshold computation of 356 attached units is 0.94 which less than one (1); however, staff recommends preparation of a discretionary EAW as allowed by Mn Admin Rule 4410.1000 Subp. 3 due to the developments proximity to the lakes and wetlands. Wetlands There are three (3) wetlands indicated on the proposed project site. Wetland Name Area Management Class Base Buffer Width Min Buffer Width Wetland 1 33.51 acres Manage 1 40ft 34ft Wetland 7 0.38 acres Incidental 0ft 0ft Wetland 10 0.13 acres Impacted/No Class 0ft 0ft TOTAL 34.02 acres There do not appear to be any wetland impacts to the larger Wetland 1. Any wetland impacts will be mitigated for per WCA regulations as administered by Vadnais Lake Area Water Management (VLAWMO). Wetland 1 is part of the City’s Wetland Management Corridor. A vegetated buffer with an average width of 40ft and a minimum width of 34ft will be required per VLAWMO rules. Staff Comment: 1. An approved wetland delineation report shall be submitted with the PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. 2. The wetland buffers shall be shown on the plans and subtracted from the gross acres to calculate net area and density. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain over the large wetland on the west side of the site. It does not appear there are any floodplain impacts. Any floodplain impacts are subject to City requirements per City Code Chapter 1103. Staff Comments: 1. A Base Flood Elevation is required to be determined, using detailed methods acceptable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 16 2. A FEMA CLOMR and LOMR may be required for development if there are floodplain impacts. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Anoka County Highway Department is evaluating the project and will provide comments at a future date. Ramsey County Ramsey County comments are provided in the attached email. Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT reviewed the concept plan and had no comments. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MnDNR reviewed the concept plan and noted Shoreland PUD requirements apply including but not limited to density, open space, and impervious surface coverage. City of North Oaks The City of North Oaks reviewed the concept plan and had no comments at this time. White Bear Township White Bear Township comments are provided in the attached email. School District White Bear Lake ISD#624 did not provide comments. Lino Lakes Public Safety Police Division had no comments. Fire Division notes the need for hydrant locations near the multi-family and commercial buildings. 17 City Engineer City Engineer comments are provided in the attached memo. Park Board The Park Board reviewed the concept plan on September 4, 2024 and recommended 100% cash dedication in lieu of land. The Park Board considered whether to designate the cash dedication funds for a future park if/when the property to the west develops, future park area C (north side of Ash Street, post 2040) or another purpose. After further discussion with City staff, the Park Board reviewed the concept plan again on October 2, 2024. EDAC The Economic Development Advisory Committee reviewed the concept plan on September 5, 2024. Their comments are attached. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the concept plan on September 11, 2024. Comments include: • Board did not feel the need to move the senior building towards Centerville Road • General support for studio apartments • Mixed support for affordable housing • Building heights okay • Gateway to City should have higher, 4 sided, architectural standards • Higher landscaping requirements • Commercial component is important • GB, General Business supported for underlying commercial zoning • Density was too high Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the concept plan on September 25, 2024. Their comments are attached. PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 18 The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. A land use application for PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be required. If required by the City Council, the developer shall have a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of a PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A master plan for this area is not required per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan-Planning District 4. Per Planning District 4, a gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning manual was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The commercial component supports economic expansion. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes (owner- occupied and renter-occupied), market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life-cycle housing. The flexible site design configuration allows for the creation of a multi-functional greenway corridor that incorporates storm water management, wetlands, open space, and trails. The development also promotes conservation and a more efficient use of land. 19 (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The site is within the shoreland districts of Lake Wilkinson and Lake Amelia and adjacent to a large wetland complex. The development transitions from low intense townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and the wetland to higher intense apartments near the arterial roads. The large wetland will be preserved and enhanced into a multi-purpose greenway corridor and storm water management system. The corridor will also be protected by a vegetative buffer that provides additional protection to the natural resources. The site provides opportunity to implement a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system should be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The development transitions from low intense townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and the wetland to higher intense apartments near the arterial roads. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. Private streets result in efficient, smaller networks of utilities and streets. This lowers development costs and public investments. (f) Mix of land use types. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types and commercial development. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes (owner- occupied and renter-occupied), market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life-cycle housing that is desirable to the City. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, page 3-3 of the Land Use Plan: Goal 1, Policy e. details the following additional public values that may be achieved in the Wilkinson Waters concept plan: 20 • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System • Using “Green” building and low impact development techniques • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches • Providing life-cycle and affordable housing • Diversifying the tax base to lessen the tax burden on residential properties Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Economic expansion 2. Greater variety of housing types such as townhomes (owner-occupied and renter- occupied), market rate apartments, and senior living 3. Multi-functional greenway corridor and storm water management system 4. Preservation and protection of lake and wetland natural resources 5. Transition from low intense residential development near natural resource to higher intense development near arterial roads. 6. Efficient use of land and private streets resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets 7. Mix of residential and commercial land uses 8. Life-cycle housing 9. Preservation of open space that is accessible to the public 10. More parkland dedication fees available for park development 11. Wider landscape buffers and trail corridors 12. Diversified tax base Flexibility Provided: 1. Building height: 40 feet (3-story) or 48 feet (4-story) > allowed 36 feet height in shoreland district. 2. Densities be calculated as a collective rather than on an individual parcel basis. 3. Floor Area: 550 square foot studio apartment unit < required 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom a. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be studio apartments. 21 RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the City Council: 1. Are there other Benefits Gained or Flexibility Provided? 2. Should the applicant provide additional public benefits in order to be considered for PUD zoning? a. Examples could be more open space, enhanced greenway corridor, wetland restoration, additional wetland buffers, higher architectural & building standards, additional landscaping etc. 3. Thoughts on PUD flexibility for building height and studio apartment floor area? 4. Does this project meet the housing goals to justify allowing for the 15 units per acre Signature Gateway bonus? a. Should the density bonus be required as affordable housing? 5. Does the Council support GB, General Business or NB, Neighborhood Business as the conventional zoning district? 6. Should the applicant hold a neighborhood meeting prior to PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat submittal? Additional Staff Comments: 1. Enhanced landscaping/streetscape should be installed at the southeast corner of the site near the commercial development. 2. A PUD Design Guidelines Booklet shall be drafted detailing the entire development’s regulations such as building and parking setbacks, architectural standards, building heights, landscaping, signage, etc. 3. A Homeowner’s Association (HOA) will own and maintain the outlots containing public and private open space, private streets, storm ponds, landscaping, etc. 4. The City will maintain the public street, trails, and stormwater ponds. 5. Sheet 2, Overall Site Plan: a. Legend and Map colors shall coincide with City’s land use colors. i. Medium Density = Brown ii. High Density = Dark Brown 6. Sheet 3, Preliminary Site Plan: a. Label setback lines b. Show proposed trail along Centerville Road 7. Sheet 5, Landscape Concepts: a. Landscape buffer along Centerville Road and Ash Street shall be provided. b. Trails shall be shown. c. Plan is missing a retail building. 8. Sheet 11, Preliminary Utility Plan: 22 a. Under Utility Legend, the proposed lines should match the plan colors. 9. Sheet 14, Land Use Plan: a. The total Site Area under Site Data areas should equal the total of the Legend areas. b. Storm ponds are not water body areas. c. Private Roadway is not open space. ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant’s Narrative 2. Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan 3. PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Chart 4. Housing Goals per 2040 Comprehensive Plan 5. White Bear Township Comments dated August 19, 2024 6. City Engineer Memo dated September 5, 2024 7. Ramsey County Comments dated September 5, 2024 8. EDAC Memo dated September 6, 2024 9. Environmental Board Memo dated October 1, 2024 AUGUST 12, 2024 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 mgrochala@linolakes.us 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Bloomington, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning RE: WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT – PUD CONCEPT PLAN SUBMISSION Mr. Grochala, ISG is submitting this PUD Concept Plan Development package on behalf of Wilkinson Waters, LLC the developer for approximately 75.89 acres of land within the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County. The property is generally located at the southwest corner of Centerville Road (County Road 21) and Ash Street (County Road 32), situated in the southeast portion of the City. This project will provide multiple land uses but will be considered as a comprehensive development plan, rather than isolated parcels of development. The proposed land uses include 33,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) – three story 100 unit market rate multi-family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 34 for rent townhome units, 22 for sale townhome units, and one (1) – 100 unit senior living facility. In addition to these land uses there will be a regional stormwater management system that will be integrated into the natural landscape North of Wilkinson Lake. ZONING AND 2040 PLANNED LAND USE The current property is zoned as Rural according to the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Map. Figure 1 below depicts an aerial with the approximate development property outlined in red. This existing zoning district is guided by the City of Lino Lakes 2024 Comprehensive Plan for a mix of Signature Gateway, High Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential. A snip of the future land use map is below in Figure 2. Additionally, Figure 3 below is a snippet of the Land Use Designation table from the Comprehensive Plan to describe the three uses identified for the proposed parcels. Figure 1: Aerial of Proposed Property Figure 2: Future Land Use Plan (Excerpt) Figure 3: Future Land Use Description Page 2 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com In addition to the Future Land Use Plan the proposed development also lies within the Shoreland Overlay Zone of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. The shoreland overlay boundary can be seen on the associated submittal plan documents and is governed by a 1,000 foot radius from the ordinary high water level of the associated lakes. The high water level for Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake are 895.2 and 908.1, respectively. Within this overlay district a few additional land use restrictions are triggered, City requests all structures shall not exceed 36 feet in heigh vs 40 feet allowed in the R4 zoning district. CULTURAL RESOURCES These four parcels historically have been utilized for agricultural purposes for cultivated row crops or left in their natural state as open water, wetlands, and wooded area. There are no buildings or structurers currently on the property and no known important archeological features. The natural resources of Wilkinson Lake and surrounding wetlands occupies approximately 34 acres of the subject property, thus the proposed development is intended to maintain and preserve these natural resources. There are two uplands wetlands that will be impacted and mitigated appropriately as a part of the proposed project. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The transportation network surrounding the proposed development is well established and is also undergoing substantial improvements. These roadway improvements are being completed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County and are currently in the preliminary design phase. The easterly frontage of the property is Centerville Road which is currently a rural section two lane road with roadside ditches and no pedestrian paths. The proposed Anoka County Project will improve the road to an urban curb and gutter cross section maintaining two travel lanes, one in each direction, and providing a 10’ pedestrian trail on the westerly side of the right-of-way. The northern frontage is Ash Street which is currently a two-lane rural section roadway with roadside ditches and no pedestrian access, Ash Street will remain in its current condition after development. In addition to the pedestrian and road section improvements along Centerville Road (County Road 21), the intersections of Centerville Road with both Wilkinson Lake Blvd/County Road J and Ash Street (County Road 32) are being improved. Currently, both intersections are controlled with stop signs, Wilkinson Lake Blvd with a 4-way stop and Ash Street with a 1-way stop (this is an existing T-Intersection). The new intersection control, at both intersections, will be a roundabout design and executed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County. Additionally, this new traffic control pattern will help moving traffic from the City of Lino Lake to I-35E directly to the east. The new roundabout at the Wilkinson Lake Blvd and Centerville Road intersection will also assist in providing the proposed development to serve as the Signature Gateway destination as planned in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Both Centerville Road and Ash Street are both functionally classified as Minor Arterials. The existing average annual daily traffic on Ash Street and Centerville Road is 5,100 vehicles per day and 10,700 vehicles per day, respectively (MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application, 2022). Future roadway projects will be analyzed in greater detail during the EAW phase of this project and any perimeter roadway improvements required, if any, will be coordinated and permitted with associated jurisdictions. Internally, to the proposed development a new public ROW will be constructed making a loop connection to the Centerville Road to the East and Ash Street to the north. This proposed ROW will be 60’ wide and will be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes. All other roads internal to the development will be private drives and maintained by the development. Page 3 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com PROPOSED ZONING & YIELD PLAN This project is being submitted as Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the City of Lino Lakes, a change from the existing zoning classification of Rural. The development team has had multiple meetings with the City Staff to confirm interpretation of the Cities Zoning Ordinances, 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and submittal requirements. It has been determined that this project be submitted as PUD with a base zoning of R-4 – High Density Residential and GB – General Business, for the residential and commercial developments, respectively. These parcel zones will lie predominately within the Shoreland Overlay of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake and are also identified to be in the Signature Gateway District, High Density and Medium Density residential districts as indicated on the 2040 comprehensive plan. As such there are a few flexibilities that are being requested to be included as part of the PUD process: 1. Maximum building height to be up to 40 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade surrounding a 3- story apartment building, or a maximum building height to be up to 48 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade surrounding a 4-story building. 2. The development’s densities be calculated as a collective rather than on an individual parcel basis. This will allow the greatest opportunity to achieve the desired densities reflected in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, while still preserving existing open space. 3. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code (1007.114 R-4(5) In regards to the overall development the below table outlines the described allowable density and the proposed density of the development: Medium Density Medium Density High Density Signature Gateway Parcel A Southwest Northwest West East Total Gross Area (acres) 15.20 15.14 19.96 25.59 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.20 10.90 7.92 0.00 34.02 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.93 3.74 4.67 Other (Undevelopable) 0.00 0.49 1.22 1.30 3.00 Net Area (acres) 0.00 3.76 9.89 20.56 34.21 Guided Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 6.0 to 8.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required # Housing Units Low 0 15 59 164 239 High 0 23 79 206 307 High + 5 Additional Units Signature Gateway 0 23 79 308 410 DUA based on Units DUA-Low 4.00 6.00 8.00 6.98 DUA-High 6.00 8.00 10.00 8.98 DUA-High + 5 Additional Units Signature Gateway 6.00 8.00 15.00 11.99 Proposed # Housing Units 354 Proposed Gross Density (units/acre)4.66 Proposed Net Density (units/acre)10.35 Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Signature Gateway TotalMedium Density Residential Page 4 of 4 952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com As shown by the above table, the project is above the maximum unit density by right, however, it is requested that the density of the Signature Gateway be extended to a maximum of 12 units/acre when the entire development is observed as a collection of all parcels. This request is within the maximum 15 units/acre allowed per the Signature Gateway definition, with City approval, within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. PHASING AND LAND DEDICATION The proposed development will be executed in multiple phases. The initial phase will be the mutli-family residential buildings with an associated clubhouse, followed by the for-rent townhome units. With this initial phasing work, it is the intent of the development to construct the public improvements within the public right-of-way including paving, utilities, and storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the site. The right-of-way will be dedicated back to the City of Lino Lakes along with any public easements needed for utility extensions. Additionally, the regional stormwater management basins will be constructed which will also be utilized as re-use irrigation system for the common spaces throughout the PUD development. All the natural resources that exist Wilkinson Lake and the wetlands will be dedicated to the City as Public Lands, as a new amenity to the City. The newly constructed stormwater management ponds will also be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes for Ownership and Maintenance, as a regional solution to stormwater for the development adjacent to Wilkinson Lake, in lieu of multiple smaller stormwater basins that incur additional maintenance cost to the City. All equipment, piping, etc required for the re-use irrigation system will be privately owned and maintained by the developer. The next phases of development will consist of the remaining town home units and retail/commercial development at the southeast corner of the site. Following that would be the construction of the senior living residential building. The final timing and phasing pattern will be coordinated with the City and will be dependent upon the market demand, but the general pattern will follow residential units first followed by the commercial use at the end. We appreciate the opportunity to bring this submittal package before the City of Lino Lakes Staff and the City of Lino Lakes Council. We look forward to work with the City to bring a development to the community that will make an impact and statement as the southeast entrance into the community. Sincerely, Jerremy Foss, PE Civil Engineering Practice Group Leader Jerremy.Foss@ISGInc.com N S W E LINO LAKES, MN ISG PROJECT # 24-30671PUD CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 G1-TITLE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL TITLE SHEET N0 SCALE IN FEET #### PROJECT INDEX: PROJECT LOCATION: APPROX. 75.89 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTERVILLE ROAD AND WILKINSON LAKE BLVD. S34 T31N R22W LINO LAKES, MN ENGINEER: PROJECT MANAGER: JERREMY FOSS, PE EMAIL: JERREMY.FOSS@ISGINC.COM 7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SUITE 550 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425 PHONE: 952.426.0699 BLOOMINGTON OFFICE ARCHITECT: PROJECT MANAGER: TERESA THORESON MCCORMACK, AIA EMAIL: TMCCORMACK@CRWARCHITECTURE.COM CRW ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN GROUP 211 11TH AVENUE NW ROCHESTER, MN 55901 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 1 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 PROJECT LOCATION OWNER: CONTACT: LAUREN GROUWS, PE - VICE PRESIDENT DEVELOPMENT EMAIL: LAUREN@NORTHOAKS.COM WILKINSON WATERS, LLC 5959 CENTERVILLE ROAD SUITE 200 NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 PH: 651-484-3361 SHEET INDEX Sheet Number Sheet Title1 TITLE SHEET 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN 3 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 4 ARCHITECTUAL ELEVATIONS 5 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS 6 CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY 7 EXISTING BOUNDARY SURVEY 8 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND SITE 9 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 10 PRELIMINARY AERIAL SITE PLAN 11 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 12 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 13 YIELD PLAN 14 LAND USE PLAN 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. FT . RE T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mphFastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = 2.3 ACRES ST O R M W A T E R MA N A G E M E N T P O N D AP P R O X = . 9 A C R E S STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = .3 ACRES G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V O H L V OH L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L G G G F B O F B O I=907.79I=908.98 U EX GGV OHL O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L G G I=901.82 I=901.80 U UGI=914.67UUUGU G U I=898.35I=898.48I=895.23 I=895.22 OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM OHLOHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WET WE T WET WET W E T W E T WET WET WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE > > > <II<II<II <II <II<II <II > I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WE T W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70 ' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 5 0 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE )EKAL NOSNIKLIW( YALREVO DNALEROHS '001 10 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (A M E L I A L A K E ) WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 7 WETLAND 10 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-OVERALL SITE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL OVERALL SITE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 200 400 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 LEGEND SIGNATURE GATEWAY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING WETLAND INFORMATION WETLAND NAME AREA MANAGEMENT CLASS BASE BUFFER WIDTH MIN BUFFER WIDTH WETLAND 1 33.51 AC MANAGE 1 40'34' WETLAND 7 0.38 AC INCIDENTAL 0'0' WETLAND 10 0.13 AC IMPACTED / NO CLASS 0'0' 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 PR O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. F T . R E T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 2.3 ACRES S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P O N D AP P R O X = . 9 A C R E S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = .3 ACRES BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OHLVOHL O H L O H L V O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O FB O F B O F B O F B O R=911.71 I=894.95? EX SAN MH I=907.79 I=908.98 EX SB-st R=919.88 I=893.60? EX EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX GGV G G UT V UT V UT V F B O FBO G UT V OHL OHL OHL OHL G GG O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L EX SB-st-13 I=901.82 I=901.80 U U G I=914.67U U U GU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WE T WET WILKINSON LAKE > > > > > > > > > <II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II <II <II EX SAN MH R=912.07? I=896.35? > I I I I I I I I I I I I I WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE 2 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y LOT 3 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:5.2 AC LOT WIDTH:835' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 1 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:12.4 AC LOT WIDTH:1051' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-SITE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 3 DEVOTED AREA TOTAL SITE AREA:75.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USES:56 AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USES:19.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USE BY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TYPE OR USE TYPE (PROPOSED RANGE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING SIZES): TOWNHOUSE:7,480 SF - 11,256 SF APARTMENT / SENIOR LIVING:41,014 SF - 45,895 SF COMMERCIAL:9,100 SF - 10,850 SF AREA DEVOTED TO COMMON OPEN SPACE:0.0 AC AREA DEVOTED TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:49.7 AC AREA DEVOTED TO STREETS:2.2 AC AREA DEVOTED TO COMMERCIAL USES:4.1 AC AREA DEVOTED TO INDUSTRIAL OR OFFICE USES:0.0 AC 32' 32' 2 4 ' 2 4 ' 18' 2 4 ' 18' 18' 2 0 ' 26' 24' 2 4 ' 2 4 ' 24' 24' 2 4 ' 24' 24' 24'24' 2 4 ' 24' 24' PROJECT PHASES PHASE 1A LOT 1 PHASE 1B LOT 1 PHASE 2 LOTS 4-7 PHASE 3 LOT 3 PHASE 4 LOT 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 60' R.O.W. 60' R.O . W . LOT 2 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION GB : GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOT AREA:4.1 AC LOT WIDTH:682' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 4 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.6 AC LOT WIDTH:151' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 5 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.7 AC LOT WIDTH:208' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 6 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.7 AC LOT WIDTH:208' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 7 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.9 AC LOT WIDTH:216' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 8 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OPEN SPACE LOT AREA:49.7 AC LOT WIDTH:N / A MIN LOT AREA:N / A MIN LOT WIDTH:N / A N DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 G1-TITLE.DWG SAVED BY: JAMIE.STEINBORN WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES, MN C4-10ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS Typical Side Elevation Apartment Centerville Road Elevation Apartment Typical Front Elevation TownhousesTypical Side Elevation Apartment Centerville Road Elevation Apartment Typical Front Elevation Townhouses 40’ 30’ 40’ 30’ 20’ 9’ DWG LOCATION: C:\USERS\TJ.WELLS\DESKTOP\30671-WILKINSEN WATERS-SHEET TEMPLATE.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS N#### WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN 4ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS Landscape Theme at Enrances and Public Space Landscape Theme at Large Open Spaces Landscape Theme at Internal Walking Path Centerville Road DWG LOCATION: C:\USERS\TJ.WELLS\DESKTOP\30671-WILKINSEN WATERS-SHEET TEMPLATE.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS N#### WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN 5LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS COMMON GREENSPACE CLUBHOUSE AND POOL CENTERVILLE ROAD VIEW DWG LOCATION: C:\USERS\TJ.WELLS\DESKTOP\30671-WILKINSEN WATERS-SHEET TEMPLATE.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS N#### WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN 6CONCEPT IMAGES R=932.10 EX MH BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R O A D C . S . A . H . N O . 2 1 C S A H NO. 32 V O H L O H L V O H L O H L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G G G G G G FBO FB O FB O FB O FB O F B O F B O U EX GGV OHL OHL OHL OHL G G OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G U U G UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL W W W W W W EM LS >>>>>>>>>> OHL R=902.44 EX MH MB MB MB SW Corner Sec. 35-31-22 S. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-31-22 W. L i n e - G o v ' t L o t 5 Se c . 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 E. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 SE Corner Sec. 34-31-22S. Line Sec. 34-31-22 Easement per Doc. No. 252087 30 0 47 0 870 W. L i n e SE 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 3 3 ' R o a d w a y E a s e m e n t N. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-31-22 N. Line SE 1/4 - SE 1/4 Sec. 34-31-22 Ease m e n t per D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 Eas e m e n t per D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 33' Roadway Easement S 1/4 Corner Sec. 34-31-22 210 1/2" Iron PipeRLS 22440 2 1/2" Brass Disc W. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 Easement Ea s e m e n t Easement C S A H NO. 32 WE T > > Approximate OHW Line from others 895.2 (NGVD29) WW W W WE T WET WE T W E T WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: (per File No. 693895) That portion of Government Lot 5, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22 West, lying west of the Centerville Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. (per File No. 693922) The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (E1/2 SE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, East of St. Paul Water Works, Anoka County, Minnesota. (per File No. 693940) The South 300 feet thereof, and except the North 170 feet of the South 470 feet of the East 870 feet thereof, that part of the West three-quarters of the South Half of the Southeast one-quarter (W 3/4 S 1/2 SE 1/4) Section 34, Township 31, Range 22 lying southeasterly of the presently existing Water Department right-of-way (meaning thereby the right-of-way easement for conduit purposes of the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners), Anoka County, Minnesota. (per File No. 693946) The South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section Thirty-four (34), Township Thirty-one (31) North, Range Twenty-two (22) West and also the South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34); and also, except the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet, all that part of the South Three Hundred (300) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of St. Paul Water Works right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying westerly of said right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter (SE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of the County Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. BASIS OF BEARING: The orientation of this bearing system is based on the south line of Section 35, Township 31, Range 22 West. Said line bears North 89 degrees 18 minutes 07 seconds West. BENCHMARK: The benchmark is top nut fire hydrant located. Elevation = feet AREA TABLE: Total Area = 75.89 acres NOTES: 1. Field work was completed on May 29, 2024. 2. This survey does not purport to show land ownership or all easements or encumbrances that affect the described property. 3. No responsibility is accepted for the location of utilities shown hereon. Verification of actual locations should be requested prior to the commencement of construction or the taking of any other action relying on actual utility locations. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are approximate, based on a Gopher State One Call. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are based on visible surface identification, and/or drawings provided by utility companies contacted by the Gopher State One Call. Utility lines in street right-of-way are not necessarily complete. Private utility lines, were not located per the Gopher State One Call, record drawings were used in preparing the location of these lines. Excavations were not made during the process of this survey to locate underground utilities and/or structures. Additional underground utilities and/or structures may be encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Center for verification of utility type and field location, prior to excavation. LS LEGEND > I UE UTL OHL G FBO W MB EM GM F C E U T FO FEMA Flood Zone Bituminous Surface Concrete Surface Gravel Surface Sanitary Sewer Line Sanitary Line from others Storm Sewer Line Storm Line from others Water Line Water Line from others Forcemain line from others Wetland line from others Underground Gas Line Underground Electric Line Underground Utility Line Underground Fiber Optic Line Overhead Utility Line Landscaping Edge Field Edge Water's Edge Treeline Iron Monument Found Indicates Mag Nail Found Indicates Cast Iron Monument Found Indicates Concrete Stone "X" Found Electric Meter Utility Vault Gas Meter Ground Light Light Pole Transformer Utility Pedestal Utility Pole/Guy Wire Curb Stop Hydrant Water Valve Benchmark Cleanout Drop Intake Manhole/Catch Basin Lift Station Mailbox Post Sign Street Sign Coniferous Tree Deciduous Tree Utility Marker Soil Boring V >> WET Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\SURVEY PRODUCTION DWGS\30671 SKETCH OF SURVEY.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL EXISTING BOUNDARY SURVEY N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 7 LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FEMA NOTE: SUBJECT TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) AND IN ZONE A (NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED) ACCORDING TO FEMA FIRM PANEL 27003C0365E AND 27003C0370E. R=932.10 EX MH BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R O A D C . S . A . H . N O . 2 1 C S A H NO. 32 OHLVOHL O H L O H L O H L V OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L G G G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O F B O FB O FB O FB O FB O U EX GGV G G G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L OH L OH L OH L O H L OH L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L U U G UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G G W W W W W W W W W W W EM LS >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R=902.44 EX MH MB MB MB SW Corner Sec. 35-31-22 S. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-31-22 W. L i n e - G o v ' t L o t 5 Se c . 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 E. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 SE Corner Sec. 34-31-22 S. Line Sec. 34-31-22 Easement per Doc. No. 252087 47 0 870 W. L i n e SE 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 3 3 ' R o a d w a y E a s e m e n t N. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-31-22 N. Line SE 1/4 - SE 1/4 Sec. 34-31-22 Eas e m e n t per D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 Eas e m e n t per D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 33' Roadway Easement 210 1/2" Iron Pipe RLS 22440 2 1/2" Brass Disc W. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 Easement Ea s e m e n t Easement 90 0 90 5 91 0 91 5 8 9 9 90 1 9 0 2 9 0 3 90 4 90 6 90 7 90 8 90 9 911 912 913 91 4 91 6 91 7 91 8 919 90 0 90 5 91 0 915 89 9 90 1 9 0 2 90 3 90 4 90 6 90 7 90 8 90 9 91 1 912 913 914 916 917 900 899 9 0 1 WET WE T WE T > > Approximate OHW Line from others 895.2 (NGVD29) LS R=919.07 EX LIFT STATION W WW W W W W W W E T W E T WE T W E T WE T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T WET WET W E T WE T WET W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T 915 915 920 92 0 925 925 925 93 0 916 917 918 919 9 2 1 921 921 9 2 1 9 2 1 922 92 2 92 2 923 9 2 3 923 923 923 924 9 2 4 924 92 6 9 2 7 92 8 9 2 9 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\SURVEY PRODUCTION DWGS\30671 SKETCH OF SURVEY.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND SITE N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 8 SOIL TYPES SYMBOL DESCRIPTION HYDRIC PREDOMINANTLY HYDRIC SOIL PREDOMINANTLY NON-HYDRIC NON-HYDRIC ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 CULTIVATED AREA 23 '' 19 '' 37 '' 23 '' 19.5 '' 50 '' 22.5 '' 34 '' 19 '' 22 '' 22.5 '' 910 91 5 92 0 925 91 1 912 913 914 9 1 6 917 918 919 921 922 923 924 92 6 92 7 92 8 92 9 9 1 5 9 2 0 925 9 2 5 9 2 5 9 3 0 9 1 3 9 1 4 9 1 6 9 1 7 9 1 8 9 1 9 9 2 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 923 923 924 9 2 4 924 9 2 6 927 928 929 90 0 90 5 91 0 915 89 9 9 0 1 90 2 9 0 3 90 4 90 6 90 7 90 8 90 9 91 1 912 913 914 916 917 91 8 90 5 91 0 9 1 5 920 9 0 2 9 0 3 90 4 9 0 6 90 7 90 8 90 9 91 1 9 1 2 9 1 3 91 4 9 1 6 9 1 7 9 1 8 919 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OHLVOHL O H L O H L V O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O FB O F B O F B O F B O U EX GGV G G UT V UT V UT V F B O FBO G UT V OHL OHL OHL OHL G GG O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L U U G U U U GU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WE T WET WE T WE T > > > > > > > > > <II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II <II <II > I I I I I I I I I I I I I WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1 6 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T TREE CONDITION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR DEAD Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C2-TREE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL TREE PRESERVATION PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 9 50 '' TREES 18" AND LARGER ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 NOTE ALL 18" AND LARGER TREES TO REMAIN 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. FT . RE T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mphFastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = 2.3 ACRES ST O R M W A T E R MA N A G E M E N T P O N D AP P R O X = . 9 A C R E S STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = .3 ACRES G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V O H L V OH L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L G G G F B O F B O I=907.79I=908.98 U EX GGV OHL O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L G G I=901.82 I=901.80 U UGI=914.67UUUGU G U I=898.35I=898.48I=895.23 I=895.22 OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM OHLOHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WET WE T WET WET W E T W E T WET WET WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE > > > <II<II<II <II <II<II <II > I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WE T W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70 ' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 5 0 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R 34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 WRUCK, GARY D 1443 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0003 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST. 34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-34-0001 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 1465 ASH ST 34-31-22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D & A 1487 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J 1509 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0001 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 LANZ KENT C & JEANNINE A 1579 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1 6 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (AME L I A L A K E ) YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (WILKENSON LAKE) 10 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) RESIDENTIAL LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AGRICULTURE LAND USE AGRICULTURE LAND USE AGRICULTURE LAND USE AGRICULTURE LAND USE COMMERCIAL LAND USE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-SITE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL PRELIMINARY AERIAL SITE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 200 400 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 10 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. F T . R E T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout G F E = 9 1 5 . 2 5 G F E = 9 1 8 . 5 0 G F E = 9 2 3 . 7 5 G F E = 9 2 4 . 5 0 G F E = 9 2 0 . 5 0 G F E = 9 1 8 . 0 0 G F E = 9 2 4 . 5 0 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 9 3 0 . 0 0 G F E = 9 1 9 . 5 0 G F E = 9 1 9 . 5 0 G F E = 9 1 8 . 0 0 FFE = 9 2 5 . 0 0 FFE = 93 0 . 0 0 F F E = 9 3 0 . 0 0 M A I N F F E = 9 3 1 . 0 0 U N D E R G R O U N D G F E = 9 2 0 . 0 0 MAIN FF E = 9 3 4 . 0 0 UNDERG R O U N D G F E = 9 2 3 . 0 0 FFE = 924.00 GFE=913.00 G F E = 9 2 6 . 0 0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 2.3 ACRES S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P O N D AP P R O X = . 9 A C R E S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = .3 ACRES > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > ELEC WILKINSON LAKE > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE I I I I I I I I I I WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V V U EX GGV U U G U U U GU G U V WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1 6 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T 104' x 8'' 2 9 5 ' x 8 ' ' 7 7 ' x 8 ' ' 2 3 1 ' x 8 ' ' 16 8 ' x 8 ' ' 284 ' x 8 ' ' 1 5 3 ' x 8 ' ' 167' x 8'' 18 4 ' x 8 ' ' 1 1 4 ' x 8 ' ' 8'' STUB I=900.14 8'' STUB I=900.14 8'' STUB I=898.38 8'' STUB I=900.96 8'' STUB I=900.96 8'' STUB I=902.17 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T HYDRANT HYDRAN T HYD R A N T HYD R A N T HYDRANT 8"8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8 " 8 " 8 " 8 " 8" HYDR A N T WILKINSON LAKE BLVD SAN MH R=925.11 I=899.95 SAN MH R=924.87 I=901.95 SAN MH R=923.16 I=900.74 SAN MH R=922.83 I=899.39 SAN MH R=921.73 I=898.37 SAN MH R=917.95 I=898.16 SAN MH R=917.53 I=897.75 SAN MH R=912.54 I=899.96 SAN MH R=911.56 I=899.44 CONNECT TO EX SAN MH SAN MH R=906.61 I=896.98 STUB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB STUB CBCB CB CB CB FES CB FES FES CB FES CB CB CB CB Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-UTILITY.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 11 UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >> <II II> I I G G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C0-LANDSCAPE IMAGERY.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS SITE PHOTOGRAPHS N0 SCALE IN FEET #### DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 12 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 NE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING NORTH TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION OF CENTERVILLE ROAD AND ASH STREET. PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 36' NE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING EAST TOWARDS CENTERVILLE ROAD AND AMELIA LAKE . PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 36' NE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST TOWARDS CENTERVILLE ROAD. PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 36' NE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHWEST TOWARDS WILKINSON LAKE. PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 36' SE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST TOWARDS COUNTY ROAD J AND CENTERVILLE ROAD INTERSECTION. PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 32' SE CORNER OF SITE LOOKING SOUTH TO WILKINSON LAKE BLVD (PRIVATE). PHOTO TAKEN AT A HEIGHT OF 32' 4 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 12 2 8 U N I T S 1 0 10 10 102 8 U N I T S 10 10 10 10 28 UNI T S 24 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 9 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 1.0 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.6 ACRES 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 6 11 10 10 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 28 U N I T S 10 10 1010 10 4 8 10 14 10 10 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = .2 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.8 ACRES 2 4 U N I T S 10 9 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 10 10 10 6 6 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.2 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.8 ACRES 22 UNITS 9 9 8 8 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.45 ACRES W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WE T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T 10 10 10 10 2 8 U N I T S 1 0 0 U N I T S BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OHLVOHL O H L O H L V O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O F B O R=911.71 I=894.95? EX SAN MH I=907.79 I=908.98 EX SB-st R=919.88 I=893.60? EX EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX GGV G G UT V UT V UT V F B O FBO G UT V OHL OHL OHL OHL G GG O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L EX SB-st-13 I=901.82 I=901.80 U U G I=914.67U U U GU G U I=898.35I=898.48 OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WE T WET WILKINSON LAKE > > > > > > > > > <II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II EX SAN MH R=912.07? I=896.35? > I I I I I I I I I I I I I W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WE T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T WET WET W E T WE T WET W E T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C13-SITE-YIELD.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL YIELD PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 13 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) 100 UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. FT . RE T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V V U G G U U G UUUGU G U V WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T W E T WE T WE T YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (WILKENSON LAKE) 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (AME L I A L A K E ) ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-LAND USE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL LAND USE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 14 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION AREA MULTI-FAMILY HOMES 4.3 AC COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 0.7 AC SENIOR LIVING FACILITY 1.1 AC PRIVATE ROADWAY 4.6 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 8.6 AC PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 13 AC LAKE (NWL)16.7 AC STORM PONDS 3.5 AC WETLANDS (REMAINING)17.3 AC SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA:75.9 AC R.O.W. AREA:6.9 AC RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA:20.5 AC COMMERCIAL LOT AREA:4.1 AC TOTAL WATER AREA:37.5 AC WETLANDS (REMAINING):8.6 AC LAKE:16.7 AC STORM PONDS:3.5 AC OPEN SPACE 26.2 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:8.6 AC PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:13 AC PRIVATE ROADWAY:4.6 AC SITE DATA TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS:356 APARTMENTS:200 SENIOR LIVING:100 TOWNHOMES:56 RETAIL SPACE: 3 BUILDINGS - TOTAL SF 29,050 SF RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS R-4 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1. FROM STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY A. LOCAL OR MINOR COLLECTOR STREET 30 FEET B. MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL STREET 40 FEET C. PARKING LOT 15 FEET 2. REAR LOT LINE A. PRINCIPAL BUILDING 30 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FEET C. PARKING LOT 5 FEET 3. SIDE LOT LINE A. PRINCIPAL BUILDING 20 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FEET C. PARKING LOT 5 FEET RETAIL SETBACKS GB GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 1. FROM STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY A. LOCAL OR MINOR COLLECTOR STREET 30 FEET B. MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL STREET 40 FEET C. PARKING LOT 15 FEET 2. REAR LOT LINE A. PRINCIPAL BUILDING 30 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FEET C. PARKING LOT 10 FEET 3. SIDE LOT LINE A. PRINCIPAL BUILDING 10 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDING 10 FEET C. PARKING LOT 10 FEET SOIL BORINGS: BRAUN INTERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 952-995-2000 WETLANDS: JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC 5821 HUMBOLDT AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 612-802-6619 WILKINSON WATERS PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations PUD Concept Plan dated August 12, 2024 Correlating Conventional Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Zoning District Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Medium Density Res R-2, Two Family Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot)50 150 7,500 R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family (unit lot)50 NA 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome (base)100 NA 24,000 High Density Res R-4, High Density Residential two-family (unit lot)50 NA 6,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome or other multi-family (base)150a NA 20,000 200+NA 20,000+b No R-6, Manufactured Home Park Manufactured Homes Signature Gateway R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family or max. 8 unit townhome 100 NA 24,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome or other multi-family (base)150a NA 20,000 1,000+NA 6 acres No NB, Neighborhood Business Commercial 100 NA 11,250 GB, General Business Commercial 100 NA 20,000 680+NA 4 acres No aShoreland PUD requires 150ft wide lot width for townhomes and apartments NA-no two-family proposed NA-proposing GB guidelines NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA-no two-family homes proposed Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA-no manufactured homes proposed 8/28/2024 City of Lino Lakes PUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 4: Housing 4-2 • Goals and Policies The vision statement, as described in Chapter 1, defines what Lino Lakes should look like in the future. The goals and policies guide the Housing Plan to help achieve that vision for housing development. The goals and policies that follow were established in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reaffirmed as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan process. Goal 1: Improve availability of affordable and life-cycle housing� Policies: a� Work with developers to identify innovative strategies for providing entry-level and life cycle housing� b� Use redevelopment tools to revitalize aging residential properties, made possible by various federal, state, local government, and non-profit programs. c� Provide expanded opportunities for housing ownership made available by various federal, state, local government and non-profit agencies. d� Provide for and designate appropriate areas for high-density development� e� Strive to integrate affordable housing in all residential land use districts� Goal 2: Enhance opportunities for senior housing� Policies: a� Develop partnerships with non-profit and private sector groups who assist in the creation of senior housing. b� Coordinate development of housing with retail accessibility (restaurants, shops, groceries)� Goal 3: Maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods� Policies: a� Promote the improvement of the existing housing stock, and to encourage the rehabilitation or redevelopment of substandard housing b� Encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Goal 4: The City will consider all widely accepted housing tools, as appropriate on an individual basis, including: • Housing Bonds • Tax Abatement • Consolidated Request for Proposals from Minnesota Housing • Site Assembly • Livable Communities Act programs • CDBG and HOME through Anoka County • Adopting a Local Fair Housing Policy • Participation in housing related organizations, partnerships, and initiatives • Preservation of existing Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) units • Community Land Trust • Manufactured Home Park Preservation • Tools that preserve private unsubsidized affordable housing (including but not limited to a local 4d program, tax incentives, etc�) 1,2,3 1,2,3:Tools in this list will be considered for housing goals numbered elsewhere in the plan 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,3 1,3 1,2 1,2 1 From:Dale Reed To:Katie Larsen Cc:James E. Studenski; Michael Grochala; Diane Hankee Subject:Comments on Wilkinson Waters Date:Monday, August 19, 2024 10:02:52 AM Katie, My comments are below: 1. In regards to the W&S easement, the Township has no easement, please change the reference in the plan sheets going forward, since the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. The only record we have (after bugging Gary Eagles for years) is a construction plan. No plat showing the easement. I suggest that the City request that record from North Oaks Company. It looks as though they did provide the Developer with the plat, since it is included with their preliminary Utility Plan sheet. 2. The Utility connection point for water will most likely change since there is a portion of the water line on Wilkinson Lake Boulevard that will be required to be moved with the upcoming Co Rd J/35E project. If the Development moves forward in 2025? There will need to be coordination between Ramsey County, the City of North Oaks, North Oaks Company, Lino Lakes, and the Developer. 3. With only a looped water system for a portion of the development there could be water quality issues. Also, if a watermain break should occur in the northerly half of the development beyond the “T” connection, a number of 4 and 6 plexes would be without water. The developer has lots of valves for isolation, but if the break should occur north of the “T” connection this would impact a fair number of users. 4. Would the City want to request a larger service line than 8” if the area north of Ash Street would develop into higher density properties? Maybe the City will expand their water to the south and east by then. 5. I am trying to verify some information on the force main running from North Oaks Lift Station #9 to North Oaks Lift Station #8. Once have completed my review I will share any potential opportunities with the proposed sanitary sewer connection. That is all I have for now. Dale Dale Reed Public Works Director White Bear Township Direct Line = 651-747-2777 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: September 5, 2024 Re: Wilkinson Waters Concept Plan Review 026515-000 WSB’s review of the Concept Plans for the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by ISG and received August 16, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Wilkinson Waters Concept Plan prepared by ISG, dated August 16, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Wilkinson Waters Development includes 76 acres south of Ash Street/County Road 32, West of Centerville Road/County Road 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, the border with the City of North Oaks. The current conceptual project proposes 56 Townhome units, two (2) 100-unit apartments, one (1) 100-unit senior living facility and 33,000 square feet of commercial retail space. • Grading The Wilkinson Waters Development includes site grading for the townhomes, apartments, and retail space as well as the connecting roads, driveways, and parking areas. A grading plan meeting City requirements will need to be submitted as part of the preliminary and final plats. • Stormwater Management Detailed stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters development has not yet been proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. Preliminary utility plans indicate storm sewer conveyance, surface drainage, and ponding systems onsite. The systems shall meet the City’s and Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization’s (VLAWMO) Stormwater Management requirements. Water reuse Ms. Katie Larsen 09/05/2024 Page 2 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review • Water Supply The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area being served by Lino Lakes via a 12” trunk water line. Lino Lakes City water is about 1.5 miles away and the City is not considering an extension at this time. In the interim the site will be supplied by the existing White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes and into the north end of North Oaks. This will require a Joint Powers Agreement between all of the Cities involved. The development is proposing two (2) current 8” connections with an 8” stub at the north end for a future connection to Ash Street (CR 32). The connection at the south end will be required to be a 12” connection and the 12” watermain will be extended to the north end to meet the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Otherwise, the development will include a water system with 8- inch diameter water main and various stub sizes being extended to each lot depending on its use. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. • Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Wilkinson Waters Development is proposed to connect to the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes. There is also an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 that is believed to be owned and maintained by White Bear Township as well and is planned to serve Lino Lakes sewer district 4. This will require a Joint Powers Agreements between developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Per the Centerville Road Sanitary Sewer memo updated 4/22/21, the City of Lino Lakes service district 4 has 354 GPM capacity reserved in the Centerville Road trunk line. There is an additional lift station planned in the future to serve the remainder of district 4 that will pump into the 18” line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. This forcemain can be drilled within City or County right of way in the future. The 8 inch line that is being required to extend to Ash Street would only serve a small localized area of sewer district 4. The City would be open to extending the 18 inch through the site to serve as much of the development as possible. However, due to depth, the senior apartments would still need to be connected to the deeper 8 inch line as proposed. A future forcemain tie in to the 18 inch would need to be accommodated. This will be further evaluated through the preliminary plat process. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with various sized service pipes being extended to each lot depending on its use. An additional sanitary sewer stub will be extended to the north at Ash Street (CR 32) for future connections. Ms. Katie Larsen 09/05/2024 Page 3 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. • Transportation The proposed land uses are expected to generate over 3,500 trips per day. Ensure City parking space requirements are met, site plan does not appear to meet the required surface lot spaces and underground parking spaces or marked ADA spaces. Townhouses project with 8+ units require guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units. Multi-family buildings require 2 spaces per unit with a minimum of half the required parking spaces to be within the building. Senior housing requires 1.5 spaces per unit or 1 per studio apartment, half of the parking spaces are required to be underground. Retail stores require 1 space for each 200 square feet of floor area. Provide turning movement exhibits for the expected design vehicle at site accesses. Turning movement exhibits for the proposed design vehicle will be required at the site accesses. Trails and sidewalks Trails/ sidewalks are not shown on the submitted Concept Plan for the residential area. Provide trail/sidewalk/ramp locations for full site plan. A trail will need to be provided from the roundabout to the west end of the development. Comments: 1. The adjacent intersections of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 and CSAH 32/CSAH 21 were included in a Traffic Study for the Ramsey County SP6281-53 (TH 35E and CR J) project and the ICE Report for Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. The west leg of the Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 proposed roundabout is still being evaluated as to whether it will be located at the existing Wilkinson Lake Blvd alignment or as proposed in the concept plan. The applicant shall provide a traffic study that addresses the City’s ordinance Sections 1001.013 and 1007.0202. The existing traffic studies may be incorporated as following: a. Applicant to verify that their projected trip generation numbers meet or are less than what was used in the Ramsey County Traffic Study and ICE report. If trip generation numbers are greater than those anticipated in the existing study the applicant will need provide a new study meeting city code. b. Evaluate the projected traffic volumes and patterns on the proposed 32 foot wide road. c. Based on proposed traffic volumes it is likely that the 32 foot wide road that extends through the site will be a collector roadway with sidewalks. d. The access to CSAH 32 will need to be evaluated for LOS and Anoka County will review. It is anticipated that the access may be restricted and turn lanes constructed. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan A wetland replacement plan and no loss request (for incidental wetland) will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through VLAWMO and the City. Ms. Katie Larsen 09/05/2024 Page 4 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Natures Refuge North Addition has not yet been submitted. One will need to be submitted and reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The submitted concept plan does not appear to impact floodplain, however FEMA Zone A floodplain extents should be shown on future plans to ensure any potential impacts are understood. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features The plan shows White Bear Lake Township easements (30’ and 50’) with the existing sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the site. White Bear Lake Township has commented that the Township has no easement and that the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. Please update the linework or provide a record showing the easements. • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Wilkinson Waters development will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Stormwater reuse systems will be owned and maintained by the developer. • Permits Required Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction Ms. Katie Larsen 09/05/2024 Page 5 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Permit 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. From:Roggenbuck, Kevin To:PW Plan Review; Julie Whitney; cameron.muhic@state.mn.us; Logan Keehr; Pat Christopherson; Dale Reed;evan.monson@tkda.com; Wes Saunders-Pearce; timothy.wald@isd624.org; brian.cocoran@vlawmo.org;kkress@northoaks.mn.gov Cc:Katie Larsen Subject:Ramsey County Comments - Land Use Application for Wilkinson Waters. Date:Thursday, September 5, 2024 4:15:00 PM Attachments:image001.jpgimage002.jpg Some people who received this message don't often get email from kevin.roggenbuck@co.ramsey.mn.us. Learnwhy this is important Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Julie, Thank you for submitting the Wilkinson Waters PUD to Ramsey County for review and comment. Our comments are below. Luis Flores, Traffic: Trip generation and a traffic study should be performed to understand the traffic impacts of this development. John Mazzitello, Programming: The Centerville Road/Wilkinson Lake Blvd/County Road J intersection is likely going to be constructed in 2026 along with improvements running north up Centerville Road. I notice the plan does not show an intersection improvement at Centerville Road and Ash Street (actually in Anoka County). The project PMT meetings have that improvement being constructed also in 2026, but that would be an Anoka County decision to make, as it would be if any of those improvements would have an effect on the proposed development. Ben Hofschulte, Permitting: Any new accesses (to Ash Street or Centerville Road) need to be permitted through Ramsey County. Thank you, Kevin Kevin Roggenbuck (he, him) Senior Transportation Planner Public Works | Economic Growth and Community Investment Office: 651-266-2790 Cell: 612-518-0138 15 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 210, St. Paul, MN 55102 ramseycounty.us | Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | e-Updates | Privacy notice  Page 1 To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Date: September 6, 2024 Re: Economic Development Advisory Committee – Wilkinson Waters Comments The EDAC discussed the Wilkinson Waters Concept Plan at their September 5, 2024 meeting and had the following comments: 1. Based on developer’s prior projects to the south, which include high architectural standards and emphasis on environmental preservation and restoration, this appears to be an ideal partnership for the City. 2. High Architectural and landscaping standards should be established particularly along Centerville Road and gateway area. 3. Landscaping at gateway 4. Public recreational opportunities should be provided, passive or active. 5. Supports commercial development along the entryway 6. No issue with the inclusion of studio apartments provided number is capped. 7. No need to require a specific affordability component to development. 8. Restoration of natural areas should be incorporated into project 9. Water service agreement with White Bear Township should be long term until Lino Lakes is able to provide service to the area. Economic Development Advisory Committee Memo  Page 1 To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Date: October 1, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments – Wilkinson Waters Environmental Board had the following comments/recommendations at their September 25, 2024 meeting: 1. A new rare plant and animal survey must be completed for the project area. Finds should be used to minimize disturbance and influence the overall project design. Opportunities to provide new or improved habitat should be incorporated into the project. 2. The project should include expanded buffers adjacent to Wetland 1. A restoration and management plan should be developed for upland buffer areas consistent with pre-settlement vegetation. 3. Building setbacks to Wilkinson Lake as proposed should be maintained. 4. Supported of 48’ building height for the senior building if overstory trees plantings are provided between building and lake. 5. The sandy, well drained areas offer the potential for stormwater infiltration. Infiltrations BMPs should be incorporated provided groundwater separation requirements can be met. 6. A stormwater treatment train that filters and treats stormwater runoff as it flows through the site should be developed. Any opportunities to incorporate natural treatment systems into the project should be encouraged. Environmental Memo  Page 2 7. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. 8. Screening/buffer should be incorporated along Ash Street and Centerville Road to provide noise mitigation 9. Trails should be incorporated along Ash Street and Centerville Road and be incorporated into the greenway following the wetland edge. 10. An EAW should be required. 11. A tree preservation plan should be required if any trees are proposed for removal. 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: October 7, 2024 TOPIC: Imagine 2050 Regional Plan Review Comments ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND Lino Lakes, while being an autonomous local government, exists within a larger regional community. This larger community is intricately connected. Most of our residents use the regional transportation system daily to get to work. Our homes and businesses are reliant on the sanitary sewer system that flows for 15 miles to the regional treatment plant. We have convenient access to international and regional airports, and we benefit from one of the Metro’s largest parks. Metropolitan Council is charged with coordinating these regional systems. As required by state statute (MN Stat. §473.145) the Metropolitan Council is required to prepare and adopt a development guide for the metropolitan area. The document includes a compilation of policy statements, goals, standards, programs, and maps prescribing guides for the orderly and economic development of the metropolitan area. The development guide will provide the basis for the preparation of the Regional System Plans - Transportation, Parks, and Water Resources Policy plans. Statutes define these areas as regional systems and direct the Council to plan for them, as well as operate and fund them. Along with the Housing Policy Plan and a Master Water Supply Plan, these documents will provide the regional framework that the City’s next Comprehensive Plan update will need to conform with. Communities in the metropolitan area are required to update their plans, fiscal devices, and official controls so that they are in conformance with the regional plans. Metropolitan Council is nearing completion of Imagine 2050 Policy Plan and has released it for public comment. The draft includes 6 sections: 1. Draft Imagine 2050 Regional Vision, Values & Goals 2. Draft 2050 Land Use Policy 3. Draft 2050 Regional Parks and Trails Policy Plan 2 4. Draft 2050 Housing Policy Plan 5. Draft 2050 Transportation Policy Plan 6. Draft 2050 Water Plan The deadline for comments is October 7, 2024. Staff have already met with both our Met Council sector staff representative as well as our Metropolitan Council Board member to raise our initial concerns. Staff will be providing comments in multiple areas of the document prior to the deadline. The focus for Monday night’s discussion will be four primary areas: 1. Community designation 2. Development density 3. Affordable housing density requirements 4. Forecasts Community Designation To address acknowledge and address differences and needs between cities in the metro area, the Metropolitan Council has developed community designations or classifications. These classifications are then used to group cities similar characteristics. Regional plan requirements or actions are then adjusted to reflect these different categories. Under the existing 2040 plan there are 5 sewered community designations of which Lino Lakes is included in the Emerging Suburban Edge category. Under Imagine 2050 the categories have been condensed to four sewered designations. The Emerging Suburban Edge category has been eliminated and Lino Lakes has been incorporated into the Suburban Edge category. In doing so, opportunities to differentiate are eliminated and a one shoe fits all approach becomes more apparent. Lino Lakes would now share the same designation as more fully developed communities like Maple Grove, Shakopee, and Woodbury. Development Density Since the preparation of the 2020 Plan, started in 1998, the Metropolitan Council has required a minimum average residential development density of 3.0 units per acre in Lino Lakes. The purpose of the requirement has been to ensure efficient and financially sustainable use of the region’s sanitary sewer infrastructure. While challenging, from both cultural and physical characteristics of the area, we have successfully met this requirement over the past 25 years. The City’s trunk sanitary sewer system has been designed to accommodate this density both now and through full build out of the community. 3 Under the Imagine 2050 plan it is proposed to raise this density to 4.0 units/acre average. Staff has not found anything in the document that supports this change from a financial perspective. Responses regarding protecting open space and maximizing efficiency of the existing infrastructure system do not seem to fit within the characteristics of this City. This potential change creates several potential issues: • The local sanitary system may not be able to accommodate the increase density and flows. This may lead to premature replacement and unplanned local costs • Increased density does not in itself preserve open space and natural resources. It just adds more units per acre. It is not clear in the plan whether downstream regional systems can accommodate this increase and larger ultimate population. • This potentially will put an even greater strain on the area’s water supply as we attempt to accommodate the density change. • It is unclear how this average density will be calculated in both the comprehensive plan and actual development. • Lino Lakes is at the end of the line of five sewer interceptors. Regional sewers are not proposed to extend through and service or any new areas outside of Lino Lakes. • The draft Wastewater System Plan notes that the Northeast Area (including Lino Lakes) has the potential to generate flows that slightly exceed the capacity of interceptors servicing this area. • Met Council is not proposing any significant transit investments for the area. Affordable Housing Density Requirements Metropolitan Council is responsible for ensuring the local communities accommodate their share of the regions affordable housing need. The City’s proposed Affordable Housing need for 2031-2040 is estimated at 450 units. While communities are not required to provide affordable housing, they are required to guide enough land at a minimum density to accommodate the housing number. The proposed plan would change how opportunities for affordable housing are provided. Cities have two options: 1. Guide sufficient land at a minimum density of 10 units/acre to meet the city or township’s total Future Need. 2. Guide sufficient land at a minimum density of 12 units/acre to meet the city or township’s Future Need for 30% AMI or less and a minimum density of 8 units per acre to meet the Future Need at 31-60% AMI. 4 The 2040 land use plan allowed areas at 8 units per acre minimum to meet the affordable housing goal. Density alone does not lead to affordable housing and the document provides no empirical evidence to show that this increased density will result in more affordable housing in Lino Lakes. It could be argued that this will not create more affordable housing and that higher density housing opportunities in Lino Lakes are limited due to our geographic location and that high density housing demand is now and is expected to remain limited. Forecasts Preliminary growth forecasts for 2050 have been prepared as part of the Imagine 2050 plan. Recognizing uncertainty over future water supply forecasts for the City of Lino Lakes have remained flat over the 20-year planning period. The 2050 population and household forecasts are lower than what is currently planned for 2040 as shown in the table below: Population 2020 Population 2030 Population 2040 Population 2050 Population Growth 2040 Plan 22,300 26,100 31,100 N/A 8,800 2050 Plan 21,399 24,562 26,548 29,069 7,670 Change (1,130) Households 2020 Households 2030 Households 2040 Households 2050 Households Growth 2040 Plan 7,000 8,600 10,600 N/A 3,600 2050 Plan 6,957 8,301 9,179 10,151 3,194 Change (406) Staff only notes that these figures would still require expansion of the City’s well field to include wells 7, 8, and 9. Without resolution to the White Bear Lake water supply issue the City may not be able to accommodate even the reduced growth expectations. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Discussion only. Staff is requesting feedback on the issues identified. ATTACHMENTS 1. Community Designations 2040_MSP Thrive 2. Community Designations Imagine 2050 95 Community Designations Page - 10 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL | IMAGINE 2050 | 2050 Land Use Policy | Public Comment Draft Figure 2. 2050 Community Designations, Draft for public comment 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 10 STAFF ORIGINATOR: WORK SESSION DATE: TOPIC: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director October 7, 2024 Discuss Offer for Proposed Land Purchase, 7473 24th Avenue (Winter Property), Closed Discussion ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND The City Council discussed the possible purchase of four properties located at 7473 24th Avenue at a special meeting on April 10, 2023. The parcels being considered are identified a Anoka County Parcel Identification Numbers 13-31-22-12-0002, 13-31-22-11-0001, 13-31-22-13-0002 and 13-31-22-14-0001 all located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 13. The property is proposed to be used for the establishment of a certified wetland bank. Portions of the property will also be needed for right-of-way for the Otter Lake Road extension project. In December of 2023 the property owner notified the City and other interested parties that they would be accepting offers on the property. Staff has had continued discussions with the owners since that time. In August, staff provided the owner with an updated appraisal and an outline of an offer as previously discussed with the City Council. Staff will be requesting City Council consideration of the owner’s response and potential counter offers at the meeting. Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c) (3), allows for the meeting to be closed to discuss offers or counter offers for the purchase of property. Staff will provide the City Council with a revised offer for consideration and proposed purchase agreement. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff is requesting City Council close the meeting to allow for discussion of the proposed purchase offer. ATTACHMENTS 1.General Location Map 74737473 Ü0600 1,200300 Feet 10/31/2022 Winter Property Project Area Map 13-31-22-12-0002 13-31-22-11-0001 13-31-22-13-0002 13-31-22-14-0001