HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/13/2024 PZ Combined Packet
Meeting guidelines on reverse side.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Broadcast on Cable TV Channel 16
and northmetrotv.com/lino-lakes-stream
ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Council Chambers (televised)
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Public Comment (sign-in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum)
4. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
5. Approval of Minutes: October 9, 2024
6. Action Items
A. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat and Variance
B. PUBLIC HEARING: Colonial Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment
C. Lyngblomsten PUD Concept Plan #2-Skilled Nursing Home
7. Discussion Items
A. Project Updates
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ADVISORY BOARD MEETING GUIDELINES
Advisory boards are fact-finding bodies established to aid the City Council in specific areas. The
decisions of any board are considered advisory only and all final decisions rest with the City
Council. Board meetings shall operate in accordance with the procedures established by the
City Council. The following meeting guidelines are derived from the City Council Rules of
Decorum.
Members of the Audience – No person in the audience shall engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct such as audible commentary during a meeting, hand clapping, stamping of feet,
whistling, using profane language, yelling and similar demonstrations, which conduct disturbs
the peace and good order of the meeting.
Public Comment– Comments from the public will be accepted on any matter, whether on the
agenda or not. Comments will not be accepted during specific agenda items unless a Public
Hearing has been noticed. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the
following guidelines:
• Sign-in prior to the start of the meeting
• Step up to the microphone when recognized by the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-
Chair)
• State your name and address for the record
• State the subject to be discussed
• Limit comments to 4 minutes
• Address comments to the board as a whole, not any specific member
• No question may be asked of a board member or staff member without the permission
of the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair)
• Elect a spokesperson for a group of persons who wish to address the board on the same
subject
Public Hearing – A public hearing is a separate item of business on the agenda. It gives the
public an opportunity to comment on the topic identified. Please remember to be courteous
and respectful and abide by the guidelines outlined for public comment (although no sign-in
required). Typically, a public hearing proceeds as follows:
1. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the agenda item and staff will
present their report.
2. Board members have the opportunity to ask staff questions about the item.
3. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) opens the public hearing and will recognize
those who want to speak.
4. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall close the public hearing.
5. The Board will then discuss the item. No further public comments are allowed.
6. The Board will make a recommendation and/or decision.
After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public
shall address the board from the audience on the matter under consideration. The Presiding
Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings.
DRAFT MINUTES
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
on October 9, 2024.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Root declared public comment open at 6:32 p.m.
Sam Bennett, 6841 Lakeview Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, Mr. Bennett wanted to
speak about the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He disagrees about the intention of the
plan and thinks the plan should promote more sense of community, support businesses
and benefit the residents of Lino Lakes. He does not understand why Town Center was
zoned industrial and thinks it would be a good opportunity for residential housing. He
also thinks the comp plan makes it difficult for residents to enjoy amenities in the City
and thinks Town Center would be a good opportunity for residential housing. He does
not feel that there is a Town Center. Mr. Bennett disagrees how some areas were
labeled and thinks there should be a limitation on the building sizes with restrictions on
width and height. He thinks when low rise and mid-rise apartments fall in disrepair it
affects a large amount of people. He thinks density using a four plex or smaller allows
the resident to own their lots and the density is still achieved. He does not want to see
large companies coming in building the same houses. He would like to see duplexes
DATE: October 9, 2024
TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M.
TIME ENDED: 8:26 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Michael Root
Suzy Guthmueller, Perry Laden, Patrick Kohler
MEMBERS ABSENT: Nathan Vojtech, Neil Evenson
STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee
Julie Whitney
Planning & Zoning Board
October 9, 2024
Page 2
DRAFT MINUTES
that appear as individual structures that are so mixed in you would not be able to
identify that it is a duplex. He would like to see more architectural interest.
Mr. Laden encouraged Mr. Bennett to become involved in the comp plan process and
thought he had some good ideas. Mr. Root informed everyone that to change the comp
plan now would require it to be amended.
Mr. Kohler moved to close public comment. Motion seconded by Mr. Guthmueller.
Public comment was closed at 6:38 p.m.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Wipperfurth moved to approve the September 11, 2024 meeting minutes with one
change. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 – 0.
6. ACTION ITEMS
A. Public Hearing: Lino Retail 2.0 Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit
and Site & Building Plan Review
Ms. Larsen presented the staff report.
The applicant, Java Companies, LLC, is proposing to plat and develop three (3)
commercial lots near Lake Drive, Marketplace Drive, and 77th Street. The Land Use
Application is for Rezoning NB (Neighborhood Business) to GB (General Business),
Preliminary Plat for 3 commercial lots, Conditional Use Permit for an Auto repair-major
and minor for fast oil change facility, Site & Building Plan Review and Vacation for a
portion of 77th Street.
Mrs. Hankee, City Engineer, noted in 2020 Anoka County completed a corridor study
from Hodgson to Main Street and provided potential improvements along the corridor
that have been concerns for the residents. The traffic study showed no significant
changes.
Mr. Laden had concerns regarding the fenestration and would like to see glass wrap
around the east side of the auto parts building. He is in favor of the connection to the
American Legion.
Planning & Zoning Board
October 9, 2024
Page 3
DRAFT MINUTES
Mr. Wipperfurth questioned why so many of the retail buildings back up to Lake Drive
instead of facing it. Ms. Larsen said there is nothing in the ordinance dictating the
direction of the building. Ms. Larsen said due to the where the residential area is it
makes sense the direction of the building. Mr. Wipperfurth also questioned how the
American Legion reacted to this business accessing their parking lot. Mr. Grochala said
when the property was sold to the legion by the City, the City reserved the right to go
over the legion parking lot to connect to Lake Drive if an access was needed. Mr.
Grochala added that Lake Drive was proposed to be a four-lane divided roadway, but
the County has changed the concept to a three lane design so the median will not block
the Legion parking lot. Mr. Wipperfurth suggested the developer be mindful of the light
that could go over the fence and that it should provide adequate height to block the
light out.
Ms. Guthmueller questioned if 7671 was included in the proposal as listed on page 22.
Ms. Larsen said it should be 7691 and will make the correction. Ms. Guthmueller
questioned if there was going to be enough parking spots if for example a restaurant
was brought into this space. Ms. Larsen said they review parking during the application
process and the applicant would need to demonstrate they can meet the parking
requirements per the zoning ordinance. She also said the area east of Lake Drive also
met the requirements for what was being proposed at the time.
Mr. Root expressed support of the fence and would also like to see vegetation within
the islands on building A and B. Mr. Root questioned if the business comes in as a minor
repair and turns into a major repair service would the new business require a full
amendment. Ms. Larsen said it could be written that way. Mr. Root recommended that
change be made for the CUP requirement. He would also like it specified no overnight
parking regardless of the reason. Mr. Grochala said it could be a 24-hour limit for the
parking.
The applicant, Mark Krough with Java Companies, introduced himself and was available
for questions.
Mr. Wipperfurth expressed concern for the parking at these businesses. Mr. Krough
said these tenants are National Credit tenants and the process to get operations to sign
off is more intense to meet the requirements. Mr. Wipperfurth inquired who the
tenants were. Mr. Krough said one applicant was a quick service restaurant and the
other is medical retail. Mr. Wipperfurth said if the businesses are open at different
times they can share parking. Ms. Larsen said they do account for joint parking between
different owners. Ms. Guthmueller thought it would be detrimental to limit the type of
Planning & Zoning Board
October 9, 2024
Page 4
DRAFT MINUTES
tenant and believes restrictions will come if there is a parking issue. Mr. Krough said
there is a risk analysis that is completed and if there was a concern they would not
move forward. Ms. Larsen said all the buildings are meeting the requirements. Mr.
Grochala said the City does not want to maximize impervious surface if not needed as it
could have detrimental impacts.
Mr. Laden requested the developer to add windows to the Lake Drive side of the
building. Mr. Krough said they would take it into consideration. Mr. Grochala added that
it could also be faux windows.
Mr. Root opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m.
Mr. Bennett, 6841 Lakeview Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, the town center should be
the most valuable part of the City but does not think the location is right for this project.
He would like to see locally owned and not a larger chain business come in. He would
like to see restaurants or cafes or even chiropractors in the space which he feels is a
more responsible use of the space.
Mr. Laden moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth.
The public hearing was closed at 7:40 p.m.
Mr. Laden moved to approve the land use application subject to the conditions listed in
the staff reporting adding that the CUP be limited to minor repairs only and maximum of
24 hour storage of vehicles outside. Mr. Laden also wanted to add the requirement of
fenestration to the east side of building C to be more consistent with the other buildings
facing Lake Drive. Mr. Laden moved to approve the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat,
Conditional Use Permit and the Site and Building Plan with the Staff and Board
recommendations. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Motion carried 5 - 0.
B. Public Hearing: Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat & Variance
Ms. Larsen presented the staff report.
The applicant, Mespargur Inc, submitted a land use application for variances and
preliminary plat for Spargur Estates. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing
parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into four (4) single family lots for the purpose of
constructing three (3) new single family homes. The lot is 1.11 gross acres (48,510 sf).
Mr. Laden questioned what they were approving now if it was requested of the
developer to reconfigure the area to three lots instead of four. Ms. Larsen said the
public hearing could be continued and the recommendation would be for the developer
to revise the plan.
Planning & Zoning Board
October 9, 2024
Page 5
DRAFT MINUTES
Mr. Root initiated a discussion regarding lot size and density and thought in the future
when the requirements change that the larger third lot could be divided. Ms. Larsen said
they calculated the area, and it did not meet the range for a four lot division. Perhaps in
the future it will.
Mr. Guthmueller did not think they should approve without seeing the 3 lot plan. Ms.
Larsen said there were two options, approve it with the conditions that they make all
the revisions that they are required to do or continue the public hearing. Ms. Larsen
said they could also deny the Preliminary Plan and Variance but is not recommended as
she feels they can meet the requirements.
The applicant Mr. Mithcell Spargur, 12952 96th Street NE, Otsego, MN 55330. Mr.
Spargur said there is already sewer and water for each lot on the property. Mr. Spargur
thought the lot should be divided into three lots and farther down the road they could
possibly create a fourth lot. Their dilemma was how to break up the lots as to not
abandon the sewer and water that is available along with the park dedication fees, the
$35,000 assessment on that lot, plus a $400 to $450,000 tax base. It only makes sense
to do a four-lot split. If he is not able to, he would abandon the one on Lois Lane
because it is financially less expensive to leave the sewer and water.
Mr. Root opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
No public comments were made.
Mr. Wipperfurth moved to continue the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden.
The public hearing will be continued at the November meeting. Motion carried 5 - 0.
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Project Updates
Mr. Grochala provided project updates.
Mr. Wipperfurth moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler.
Meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Whitney – Community Development Administrative Assistant
1
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
P & Z MEETING DATE: November 13, 2024
REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING Continued for Spargur Estates
1.Variance
2.Preliminary Plat
CASE NUMBER: VR2024-001
PP2024-004
APPLICANT: Mespargur Inc.
Attn: Mitch Spargur
12952 96th St NE
Otsego, MN 55330
REVIEW DEADLINE:
Complete Application Date: September 9, 2024
60-Day Deadline:November 8, 2024
60-Day Extension:January 7, 2024
Environmental Board Meeting: September 25, 2024
Park Board Meeting: NA
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: October 9, 2024
November 13, 2024
City Council Work Session: December 2, 2024
City Council Meeting: December 9, 2024
INTRODUCTION
On September 9, 2024, the applicant, Mespargur Inc, submitted a complete land use
application for variances and preliminary plat for Spargur Estates. The applicant
proposed to subdivide the existing parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into four (4) single
family lots for the purpose of constructing three (3) new single family detached
dwellings. The preliminary plat did not meet density requirements. On October 9,
2024, the Planning & Zoning Board opened and motioned to continue the public hearing
to allow the applicant time to revise the plans.
2
This staff report is based on the following submittal information:
•Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision
date October 15, 2024
•Drainage Report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. revision date October 15,
2024
•Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
dated August 23, 2024
•Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated
October 2, 2024
BACKGROUND
The lot is legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mar Don Acres.
History
Mar Don Acres
Mar Don Acres was originally platted in 1978. As part of that plat, eight (8) lots were
created north of Lois Lane with each lot being 294.00 feet in depth and approximately
165 feet in width with lot sizes of 48,510 sq. ft. Houses were purposely located on the
lots in a manner so that the lot could further subdivided when public water and sewer
become available. Three (3) other residential subdivisions similar to the proposed
Spargur Estates have since been approved from these 8 lots.
Hailey Manor
Hailey Manor subdivided Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 12 single family
residential lots (3 original lots subdivided into 4 lots each for a total of 12 lots). The
parcel was rezoned and variances were allowed for 132 foot lot depths vs 135 foot
required due to required 30 foot right of way dedication along Arlo Lane.
The following actions were approved in 2006/2007 by City Council regarding Hailey
Manor:
•Resolution No. 03-120 for Variance and Preliminary Plat
•Ordinance No. 16-03 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family
•Resolution No. 03-208 for Final Plat
This plat is directly east of the proposed Spargur Estates.
Isabell Estates
3
Isabell Estates subdivided Lot 3, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential
lots.
The following actions were approved by the City Council in 2014 regarding Isabell
Estates:
• Resolution No. 14-66 approving variances for lot depth, lot width and side
setback
• Resolution No. 14-67 approving the Preliminary Plat
• Resolution No. 14-114 approving the Final Plat
This plat is west of the proposed Spargur Estates.
Golden Acre
Golden Acre subdivided Lot 4, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential
lots. The parcel was rezoned and variances were also approved allowing for 132 foot
deep lots, lot width reduction and side yard setback reduction due to required right of
way dedication and location of existing house on the lot.
The following actions were approved by City Council regarding Golden Acre:
• Resolution No. 06-181 for Variances and Preliminary Plat
• Ordinance No. 11-06 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family
• Resolution No. 07-103 for Final Plat
This plat is immediately west of the proposed Spargur Estates.
Existing Site Conditions
The 1 acre site is a residential lot containing a single family detached dwelling and
attached garage. Other than trees and shrubs, there are no significant natural resources
on site. The Certificate of Survey indicates a Soderville fine sand and Zimmerman fine
sand on the property.
Zoning
Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential
Current Land Use Rural Residential
Future Land Use per CP Low Density Sewered Residential
(1.6 to 3.0 units per acre)
Utility Staging Area 1A = 2018-2025
4
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use
North R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density
Sewered Residential
East R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density
Sewered Residential
South R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density
Sewered Residential
West R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density
Sewered Residential
ANALYSIS
Density and Land Area Calculations
The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density.
Gross Area (acres) 1.11
Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00
Public Parks & Open Space 0.00
Arterial ROW 0.00
Other 0.00
Net Area (acres) 1.11
# of Units 3
Gross Density (units/acre) 2.70
Net Density (units/acre) 2.70
Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential
development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of
2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning Requirements
Zoning requirements and standards of the R-1 Single Family Residential District apply to
this subdivision.
5
R-1
Requirements
Proposed
Lot 1
(existing
house)
Lot 2 Lot 3
Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 21,780 sf 10,890 sf 10,890 sf
Min. Lot Width 80 ft 165 ft 82.50 ft 82.50 ft
Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 132a ft 132a ft 132a ft
Building Setback
-From Streets
Lois Ln and Arlo Ln
(Both Minor Collector) 30 ft 38.9 ft 30 ft 30 ft
-Rear
--Principal 30 ft 49.3 ft 30 ft 30 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 23 ft 5 ft 5 ft
-Side
--Principal 10 ft 90 ft 10 ft 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 7.3 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Impervious Surface 65% 17.6%
TBD w/
building
permit
TBD w/
building
permit
aVariances are required for the lot depths.
Building Requirements
At the time of building permit, the single family detached dwellings proposed on Lot 2
and Lot 3 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building
footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards.
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
The preliminary plat has been reviewed for compliance with the comprehensive plan,
zoning and subdivision ordinance. The subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive
6
plan. It does meet the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance
with the approved variances.
Blocks and Lots
The proposed preliminary plat creates 1 block with 3 lots. Lot 1, Block 1 will contain the
existing house which will remain on site. Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be developed with single
family detached dwellings.
Streets and Alleys
Arlo Lane is a minor collector road and is capable of handling two (2) additional single
family detached dwellings.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements are being dedicated along the lot lines.
Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control
The proposed development does not require a stormwater management plan under City
Code Chapter 1011. Per the Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations report revision
date October 15, 2024, a small rear yard depression is shown to help get drainage from
west to east. This basin overflows to the east to match existing conditions. It is assumed
the basin will drain dry between storm events.
Public Utilities
The existing house at 559 Lois Lane is connected to public watermain and sanitary
sewer. The two (2) new lots will also be connected to public water and sanitary which is
capable of handling two (2) single family detached dwellings. Water and sanitary sewer
laterals are already stubbed into the two (2) proposed lots.
Public Land Dedication
The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area.
The development is not within the greenway system. Arlo Lane is identified as a future
trail corridor that is proposed to extend from Highland Meadows Park to Woodduck Trail
and eventually to 4th Avenue.
The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 1 with
the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee.
7
Park Dedication Fees
Total # of Lots = 2
x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300
= Total Due $6,600
Tree Preservation and Landscaping
A tree survey was performed that identified:
19 trees were identified in the tree inventory, with 2 proposed for removal. 7 or the
remaining 17 are located off site along the western property line of lot 3.
The 17 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in
accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. The Tree Protection Zones need
to be shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Landscape Plan.
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met.
Open Areas Landscape Standards
Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots.
Buffer and Screen Standards
The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types,
screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and
surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply.
Canopy Cover
Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development.
Foundation Landscaping
Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential
development.
Total Trees 19
Total Trees Removed 2
Total Trees Preserved 17
Mitigation Trees Required 0
8
Sod and Ground Cover Standards
All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have
a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed
may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to
natural areas or wetlands.
The ground cover types and locations must be added to the Grading Drainage and
Erosion Control Plan and the Landscape Plan.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached
residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory
EAW.
Wetlands
There are no wetlands on site.
FEMA Floodplain
There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
Shoreland Management Overlay
The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district.
Impervious Surface Coverage
The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 1 (existing house)
is at 17.6% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lots 2 and 3 will be evaluated
with those individual building permits and surveys.
Traffic Study
A traffic study is not required for two (2) new single family lots on Arlo Lane. It is a minor
collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached dwellings.
Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments
Public Safety Comments
9
Lino Lakes Public Safety Department-Police Division and Fire Division reviewed the
preliminary plat and had no comments.
Environmental Board
The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their September 25,
2024 meeting and noted some with minor revisions are needed. The Environmental
Coordinator reviewed the revised plans. Comments are summarized in the attached
November 1, 2024 Environmental memo.
Agreements
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management
plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010.
Development Agreement and Final Plat
The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat
approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final
plat application.
Comprehensive Plan
Spargur Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan
regarding land use, density, housing, economic development, transportation, local
water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails.
Land Use Plan
Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential
development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of
2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The site is in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development.
There are no specific planning recommendations for this site.
Housing Plan
A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality
environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing
where appropriate.
10
Spargur Estates meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing.
Economic Development
The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the
City’s economic development plan.
Transportation Plan
A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Arlo
Lane is a minor collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached
dwellings.
Local Water Management Plan
The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural
surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into
surface water systems.
Spargur Estates protects the natural surface and groundwater storage with the
construction of a small rear yard depression. Erosion and sediment control practices will
also be implemented.
Sanitary Sewer Plan
The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses
with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system.
The existing house is served by an 8” municipal sanitary sewer main along Lois Lane. The
two (2) new lots will be served by 8” municipal sanitary sewer along Arlo Lane.
The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached
dwellings.
Water Supply Plan
A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable
potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand.
The existing house is served by an 8” municipal watermain along Lois Lane. The two (2)
new lots will be served by 8” municipal watermain along Arlo Lane.
The existing water supply system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached
dwellings.
11
Parks, Greenways and Trails
A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development
and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land
dedication for the two (2) new lots.
Findings of Fact-Variances
The lots are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District. The required R-1 lot depth is
135 ft. The following variances are required for the Spargur Estates preliminary plat:
•Lots 1, 2, and 3:
o A three (3) foot variance to reduce the required lot depth from 135 feet
to 132 feet.
All lot areas exceed the minimum 10,800sf. As previously noted, similar lot depth
variances were approved for Hailey Manor, Isabell Estates, and Golden Acre.
Per City Code Section 1007.018(3):
(a)Criteria and findings of fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the
criteria in divisions 1. through 6. below, or unless division 7. below applies. The city shall
make findings regarding compliance with these criteria.
1.The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this
chapter.
The general purpose and intent of the R-1, Single Family Residential District is to provide
a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a
suburban density. The district is intended for development of single family detached
homes on lots served with public sanitary sewer and water.
The three (3) lot residential subdivision proposed for Spargur Estates meets the general
purpose and intent of providing single family housing. All three (3) lots will be served by
public water and sanitary sewer. The development will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood.
2.The variance shall be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The variance is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
12
3.There shall be practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. “Practical
difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that
the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by this chapter. Economic considerations alone do not constitute
practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to,
inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
The subdivision of an existing parcel and creation of three (3) residential lots are
reasonable uses of the property. The practical difficulty in complying with the lot depth,
lot width and setback standards of the zoning ordinance would only allow for the
creation of two (2) lots. This would not be consistent with the intent of the Mar Don
Acres plat or the previously approved Hailey Manor and Isabell Estates subdivisions.
4.The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the
property not created by the landowner.
The plight of the landowner is created by the requirement to dedicate 30 feet of road
right-of-way on Arlo Lane which reduces the lot depths to 132 feet. The need for the
variances was not created by the landowner.
5.The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality.
The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposal to create
three (3) single family residential lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single
family detached dwellings is compatible with the surrounding existing single family
detached dwellings. Similar variances were approved for the two adjacent subdivisions,
Hailey Manor and Golden Acre.
6.A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the
ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located.
Single family detached dwellings are permitted uses in the R-1, Single Family Residential
District.
7.In accordance with M.S. § 462.357, Subd. 6, variances shall be granted for earth
sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in
harmony with the zoning ordinance.
Not applicable.
Findings of Fact-Preliminary Plat
Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
13
(1)General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature
pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2)Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a)Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
1.Land use plan;
2.Transportation plan;
3.Utility (sewer and water) plans;
4.Local water management plan;
5.Capital improvement plan; and
6.Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
Spargur Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive regarding
resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development
is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and
growth management policies.
(b)Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the
city's infill policies:
1.The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive
Plan;
2.The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of
the following:
a.An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision;
b.One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by
the developer;
c.The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with
available city trunk funds; and
d.The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the
city's capital improvement plan.
3.The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with
the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and
4.The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or
future operation and maintenance.
Spargur Estates is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the
current Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. No new utility or street extensions are
required. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with
the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility
costs are proposed.
14
(c)Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet
the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway
Capacity Manual:
1.If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or
B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service
more than one grade;
2.If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by
a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C;
3.If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by
a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D;
4.The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing
access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision
developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to
ensure a level of service D or better;
5.Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have
the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed
subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies;
6.The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street
improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan.
However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed
improvements to correct any street deficiencies;
7.The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-
35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange
impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine
improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic
generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total
traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine
financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other
jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and
8.The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
Spargur Estates meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Arlo Lane is a minor
collector road and has structural capacity to handle two (2) additional single family
detached dwellings. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the
City’s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local
determination.
(d)Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate
water supply when:
1.The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the
subdivision;
2.The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and
offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision;
15
3.The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for
personal use and fire protection; and
4.The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be
provided with a potable water supply.
Spargur Estates will have an adequate water supply. The subject site is served by an 8”
DIP watermain along Lois Land and Arlo Lane. The water supply system has capacity to
handle two (2) new single family detached dwellings.
(e)Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate
waste disposal systems when:
1.The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent
with the MUSA allocation criteria;
2.The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if
developed to its maximum density;
3.The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes
sewer plan and capital improvement plan;
4.A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an
adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and
5.A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system
has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper
financing.
Spargur Estates will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The subject site
is in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub-district 2B) and is served by MCES Interceptor 83-61, a
24 inch gravity sewer located in North Road. The subject site is also in the current 1A
(2018-2025) Utility Staging Area. An 8” PVC sanitary sewer main exists along both Lois
Lane and Arlo Lane. The sanitary system has capacity to handle two (2) new single family
detached dwellings.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of variances and preliminary plat for Spargur Estates subject
to the following conditions:
1.Comments from City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024 shall be
addressed.
2.Comments from Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024 shall be
addressed.
3.Sheet S2, Preliminary Plat:
a.The gross and net density information under Area is incorrect and shall
be revised. The public right of way is not subtracted when calculating
density. Please see the staff report for the correct information.
4.Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan:
16
a.The area east of the existing driveway off Lois Lane labeled “Remnants of
Old Gravel Area Now Overgrown with Grass” shall be shown as being
removed.
The following items shall be addressed prior to November 30, 2025 or at time of
building permit issuance:
1.As shown on Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan:
a.The existing fence and pavers shall be removed.
b.The old gravel area now overgrown with grass adjacent to the existing
driveway off Lois Lane, the random dirt piles, and the gravel driveway off
Arlo Lane shall be restored with proper ground cover in compliance with
City Code Section 1007.049(8).
ATTACHMENTS
1.Site Location & Aerial Map
2.Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision
date October 15, 2024
3.City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024
4.Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024
W o o dd uc kTr lMy
r
t
l
e
L
n
Lois Ln
Nottingham Ln
Arlo Ln
MeadowView TrlJoseph CtHighland Trl
Myrtle Ln
Highland Meadows
Park
LoisLnArlo L n
Country Ln
Legend
Address Labels
Parcels
October 2, 2024
±
Map Powered By Datafi
1 in = 200 Ft
Spargur EstatesAttachment 1: Site Location & Aerial Map
HOUSEGARAGE60 CANT.EXISTING909.1909.0MBOX5911.1910.1SIGN30 30
30 30HOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEGARAGEHOUSEEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGESHEDEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEPORTABLESMOKE HOUSE38.9 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTPER THE PLAT OF MAR DON ACRES30
3055
5510
10
D
E
C
K
STEPS
907.1SB#4907.9SB#3907.5SB#2909.2SB#1(22" x 34")S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM1 INCH = 30 FEETHORIZONTAL300 15 3060VICINITY MAP ( NOT TO SCALE )DEVELOPERME SPARGUR INC.12952 96TH ST NEOTSEGO, MN 55330MITCH SPARGUR952-412-6760MITCH@MITCHSPARGUR.COMENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC.6776 LAKE DRIVELINO LAKES, MN 55014ADAM GINKEL, P.E.651-361-8234ADAM@PLOWE.COMTITLE SHEETSPARGUR ESTATESLINO LAKES, MINNESOTASURVEYOR E.G. RUD & SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC.6776 LAKE DRIVELINO LAKES, MN 55014JASON RUD651-361-8225JRUD@EGRUD.COMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC0Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY
NORTH
24-2164SHEET INDEXCOTITLE SHEETGRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC PLANC1.1S1CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY WITH RESOURCE INVENTORY MAPS2PRELIMINARY PLATC1.2UTILITY PLANC1.3C2.1REMOVALS PLANLANDSCAPE PLANALL PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERMITSFROM CITY OF LINO LAKES, MNDOT, AND THE MINNESOTADEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, SHALL BEOBTAINED PRIOR TO ORDERING OF MATERIAL ANDSTARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. NO INSTALLATION OFUTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED UNTIL ALL APPLICABLEPERMITS ARE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. INSTALLATIONOF UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MINNESOTADEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS ANDCITY STANDARDS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PUBLICWORKS/ENGINEERING STANDARDS.S3TREE INVENTORY WITH REMOVALSDETAILSC3.1SITEDESCRIPTION10.15.24 Attachment 2: 2. Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024
HOUSEGARAGE60
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
909.3909.6908.0907.8908.2908.9909.5912.2EXISTING909.1909.2904.7906.9909.60TC909.6909.2909.3909.3907.5907.3907.2907.0906.5906.9908.3909.6906.9
907.4
909.1909.7909.0 909.1
907.0 907.2
908.7
910.9 910.0
908.7
907.0 907.7
908.8
909.5 908.7909.0MBOX5908.70TC908.66TC909.1910.4911.9911.9911.9910.1908.42EBIT TC908.44TC908.87TC909.0CS
907.6907.1906.6906.8906.8907.0906.9907.1907.5908.9908.9908.95TC909.17TC909.3908.0907.0907.3907.1907.4907.7909.30TC909.12TC909.40TC909.5908.5908.0907.3907.2907.1907.5907.9908.0908.2907.7907.3907.0907.6908.3909.1909.8909.50TC909.68TC909.6909.5908.6908.2908.1908.1908.3908.0908.6909.2909.2909.1909.1908.9909.3909.66TC909.37TC909.47TC909.7909.32TC909.3909.9909.1908.8 909.2
909.4910.3910.2910.0910.0
909.1
909.4 909.5
909.5910.3910.7909.5
909.3
909.4 909.1
909.0909.0908.5908.2908.1908.0907.2907.0907.4907.9908.1907.7907.0907.0908.1907.1907.9908.3908.6908.2908.1908.6910.9910.2908.3908.0908.2
908.3
908.5910.8911.1911.6910.73212908.9SPRUCE 6911.3 911.9909.9
908.8
3217908.8OAK 63218908.9OAK 63219909.2ASH 10908.9
909.0911.0910.2CS910.2909.94EBIT TC909.81TC910.1SIGN3231909.5PINE 63232909.4COTTONWOOD 163233909.4OAK 8909.9909.89TC908.8908.1908.6908.6910.6909.2906.3909.46TCCS
909.4CS909.0CS909.3907.2907.1907.23500909.9MAPLE30909.3909.5909.9910.4909.5909.4910.03508910.3MAPLE22910.0908.93511907.8PINE16907.2907.1907.1907.1907.0907.23520907.2SPRUCE12906.8906.93523907.5SPRUCE163524909.1CRAB9909.2
910.4908.8909.4
9
1
0
.
9
909.9910.2 909.9910.9 910.0911.09
1
0
.
2910.7910.4910.0909.9910.4910.6910.3910.5910.7910.8910.8910.7
910.9910.8910.9910.5
910.1909.7910.4910.6910.9910.9916.8FFE3571908.9MAPLE183572908.1MAPLE18908.3907.0EFIREPIT907.2EFIREPIT3578910.7MAPLE34909.8909.4909.3909.
3
911.3910.2909.25TC909.08TC909.05TC909.18TC909.18TC909.3910.0910.3911.2FFE-GAR910.8910.5909.63610910.2CRAB10911.9911.2911.0910.8910.9911.9912.3DOOR-FFE+-910.4 910.9
911.1
910.2910.2
910.9
910.2
911.0910.3909.991
0
.
6
910.1909.9
909.6
909.2909.1909.4910.4
911.3
910.8910.4
909.7910.1
911.6911.0910.0909.3909.14EBIT-TC909.01TC909910909908907907908909910
909907908910
911 910
908907909908
911910909CO909.54SANSVC909.46MHSANHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEGARAGEHOUSEEXISTING90
5 906907908908909906907908909908909910HOUSEEXISTINGGARAGE908.90MHSANSHEDEXISTING91
0
9099089
0
4HOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEPORTABLESMOKE HOUSEEXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
0.60.53.5WEST FACE OFRETAINING WALL ONOR NEAR LOT LINE6.09.13.2FENCE907.1SB#4907.9SB#3907.5SB#2909.2SB#18.37.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE909.2909.3EDGE OFLANDSCAPING910.7910.8REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA.NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS.S.E.W.O.LOW ENTRY = 909.4LOW FLOOR = 909.460.0060.00
60.00
60.002.0%2.0%
1.5%PROVIDE EXTRA DEPTHFOOTINGS AND EXPOSEFOUNDATION (TYP)EOF: 907.21.5%HWL 907.4DWY
6.7%
DWY
7.6%FRONT GAR912.5909LOW ENTRY = 909.4LOW FLOOR = 909.4FRONT GAR912.5910910S.E.W.O.906.8906.8FILL FRONTAGE TOPROVIDE POSITIVEDRAINAGE TO CURBMOVE BUILDING TO BEAT LEAST 5-FT FROMPROPERTY LINERELOCATE FIRE PIT TO BE: (A) AT LEAST 20-FT FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES (B) AT LEAST 25-FT FROM ALL STRUCTURES1.5%RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITHTEMPORARY SEED MIX - ONCE BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, LOTTO BE PROVIDED WITH SODTREE PROTECTIONFENCING (TYP)EXISTING TREES SHALL BEPROTECTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH CITY TREE PROTECTIONFENCE DETAIL (GEN-27) - TYP.REMOVE TOPSOIL ANDREPLACE WITH MIX OF 70%SAND / 30% TOPSOILPROVIDE BIOROLLS TO PROTECTBASIN FROM SEDIMENT907907907
907 2.0%908908909909910909908907 910912912908ROCKCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE909.65908.50909.00910.00908.00907.50910.30909.10910.402.0%
9
1
0 GENERAL NOTES1.THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TOTYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESEUTILITIES.2.CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONSFOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THESTART OF INSTALLATIONS.4.ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES.5.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS.6.PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ONPUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.7.NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION.8.ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALLUTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITYCOMPANY.9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC.DENOTES FENCEDENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWERDENOTES EXISTING WATER MAINDENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEDENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEXXGASEDENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBLDENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEDENOTES HYDRANTDENOTES GAS METERDENOTES SIGNDENOTES CONCRETE SURFACEDENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACEDENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTALDENOTES CABLE PEDESTALDENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONDENOTES WELLDENOTES MAILBOXDENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXDENOTES ELECTRICAL BOXDENOTES EXISTING CONTOURSDENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNITDENOTES CLEAN OUTDENOTES CURB STOPDENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEX 952.36CECOCSSTWLEGENDDENOTES RETAINING WALLDENOTES PAVER SURFACES:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC1.1Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
GRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC PLAN PRELIMINARY24-2164(22" x 34")NORTH1 INCH = 20 FEETHORIZONTAL200102040ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ORIMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS.PHASE I:1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.2.PROVIDE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.3.INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN.3.1.ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE.3.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OFACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION.3.3.SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN-PLACE UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED.3.4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET, OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL FOR ANY SLOPES THATAPPEAR TO BE FAILING. (NOTE: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MUST HAVENON-FIXED JOINTS AND BE FULLY BIODEGRADABLE; ANY BLANKET NETTINGMUST BE LOOSE-WEAVE.)4.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.5.PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FENCING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY TREEPROTECTION FENCE DETAIL (GEN-27).6.PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA-BY-AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZEDAREAS.6.1.CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOILAREAS, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYSAFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITETEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.7.PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES TO ENSURE THE EROSIONCONTROL PRACTICES INPLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENTONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.8.STABILIZE SOIL STOCKPILES; STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY.9.FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SWEEP/SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETSWHEN MATERIALS OR DEBRIS HAVE WASHED/FLOWED ONTO ADJACENT STREETS ORAS DIRECTED BY CITY.PHASE II:1.PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEED FOR DISTURBED AREAS.2.INSTALL RIP-RAP AT FLARED-END SECTIONS (AS APPLICABLE).3.INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETSTRUCTURES IN PAVING AREAS (AS APPLICABLE.)4.INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, STORM SEWER.5.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND/OR SOD.6.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONLY AFTERSITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED.** SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY BIODEGRADABLE, NONFIXED JOINT FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION.* MOW A MINIMUM OF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - ONCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF - ONCE PER 4 WEEKS3885 (CATEGORY 2)WOOD FIBER BLANKET3881FERTILIZER3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED)MULCH* FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENTITEM3876SEED **3878SODMNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTESMNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE)MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE)TEMPORARYMNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE)FALL COVERMNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE)SPRING/SUMMERMNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE)1-2 YEARS COVERMNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE)2-5 YEARS COVERCOMMERCIAL TURFRESIDENTIAL TURFMNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE)SOIL-BUILDING COVER3884HYDROMULCHREVEGETATION SPECIFICATIONSTIMING FOR EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROLRCallbefore you dig.below.Know what'sSITE AREA= 48,510 SFAREA OF DISTURBANCE= 27,000 SF= 0.62 ACRESEXISTING IMPERVIOUS= 6,258 SF *NEW & RECONSTRUCTED IMPERVIOUSLOT 2 DRIVEWAY *= 1,210 SFLOT 2 HOUSE / PATIO= 2,000 SFLOT 3 DRIVEWAY *= 1,210 SFLOT 3 HOUSE / PATIO= 2,000 SF TOTAL= 6,420 SF* INCLUDES INSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAYGRADING INFORMATIONDENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURSDENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION909.65DESCRIPTION10.15.24
HOUSEGARAGE60
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
909.3909.6908.0907.8908.2908.9909.5912.2EXISTING909.1909.2909.05FNDIP1/2908.69FNDIP1/2904.7906.9906.84FNDIP12294907.35FNDIPCAP
-UNDERROOT909.48FNDIP17765908.52FNDIP17765909.60TC909.6909.2909.3909.3907.5907.3907.2907.0906.5906.9908.3909.6906.9
907.4
909.1909.7909.0 909.1
907.0 907.2
908.7
910.9 910.0
908.7
907.0 907.7
908.8
909.5 908.7909.0MBOX5908.70TC908.66TC909.1910.4911.9911.9911.9910.1908.42EBIT TC908.44TC908.87TC909.0CS
907.6907.1906.6906.8906.8907.0906.9907.1907.5908.9908.9908.95TC909.17TC909.3908.0907.0907.3907.1907.4907.73106908.5MAPLE 6909.30TC909.12TC3111908.5MAPLE 6909.40TC909.5908.5908.0907.3907.2907.1907.5907.9908.0908.2907.7907.3907.0907.6908.3909.1909.8909.50TC909.68TC909.6909.5908.6908.2908.1908.1908.3908.0908.6909.2909.2909.1909.1908.9909.3909.66TC909.37TC909.47TC909.7909.32TC909.3909.9909.1908.8 909.2
909.4910.3910.2910.0910.0
909.1
909.4 909.5
909.5910.3910.7909.5
909.3
909.4 909.1
909.0909.0908.5908.2908.1908.0907.2907.0907.4907.9908.1907.7907.0907.0908.1907.1907.9908.3908.6908.2908.1908.6910.9910.2908.3908.0908.2
908.3
908.5910.8911.1911.6910.73212908.9SPRUCE 6911.3 911.9909.9
908.8
3217908.8OAK 63218908.9OAK 63219909.2ASH 10908.9
909.0911.0910.2CS910.2909.94EBIT TC909.81TC910.1SIGN3231909.5PINE 63232909.4COTTONWOOD 163233909.4OAK 8909.9909.89TC908.8908.1908.6908.6910.6909.2906.3909.46TCCS
909.4CS909.0CS909.3907.2907.1907.23500909.9MAPLE30909.3909.5909.9910.4909.5909.4910.03508910.3MAPLE22910.0908.93511907.8PINE16907.2907.1907.1907.1907.0907.23520907.2SPRUCE12906.8906.93523907.5SPRUCE163524909.1CRAB9909.2
910.4908.8909.4
9
1
0
.
9
909.9910.2 909.9910.9 910.0911.09
1
0
.
2910.7910.4910.0909.9910.4910.6910.3910.5910.7910.8910.8910.7
910.9910.8910.9910.5
910.1909.7910.4910.6910.9910.9916.8FFE3571908.9MAPLE183572908.1MAPLE18908.3907.0EFIREPIT907.2EFIREPIT3578910.7MAPLE34909.8909.4909.3909.
3
911.3910.2909.25TC909.08TC909.05TC909.18TC909.18TC909.3910.0910.3911.2FFE-GAR910.8910.5909.63610910.2CRAB10911.9911.2911.0910.8910.9911.9912.3DOOR-FFE+-910.4 910.9
911.1
910.2910.2
910.9
910.2
911.0910.3909.991
0
.
6
910.1909.9
909.6
909.2909.1909.4910.4
911.3
910.8910.4
909.7910.1
911.6911.0910.0909.3909.14EBIT-TC909.01TCCO909.54SANSVC909.46MHSANHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEGARAGEHOUSEEXISTINGPERIMETER OF RANDOMDIRT PILESHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGE908.90MHSANSHEDEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEPORTABLESMOKE HOUSEEXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY0.60.53.5WEST FACE OFRETAINING WALL ONOR NEAR LOT LINE6.09.1908.97FNDIP3.2FENCE907.1SB#4907.9SB#3907.5SB#2909.2SB#18.37.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE909.2909.3EDGE OFLANDSCAPING910.7910.8REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA.NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS.REMOVE GRAVELDRIVEWAYREMOVE FENCEEXISTING SOIL STOCKPILETO BE USED FOR ONSITEGRADINGREMOVEPAVERSREMOVETREE (TYP)GENERAL NOTES1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TOTYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESEUTILITIES.2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONSFOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THESTART OF INSTALLATIONS.4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES.5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS.6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ONPUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION.8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALLUTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITYCOMPANY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC.DENOTES FENCEDENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWERDENOTES EXISTING WATER MAINDENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEDENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEXXGASEDENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBLDENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEDENOTES HYDRANTDENOTES GAS METERDENOTES SIGNDENOTES CONCRETE SURFACEDENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACEDENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTALDENOTES CABLE PEDESTALDENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONDENOTES WELLDENOTES MAILBOXDENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXDENOTES ELECTRICAL BOXDENOTES EXISTING CONTOURSDENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNITDENOTES CLEAN OUTDENOTES CURB STOPDENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEX 952.36CECOCSSTWLEGENDDENOTES RETAINING WALLDENOTES PAVER SURFACES:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC1.2Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
REMOVALS PLAN PRELIMINARY24-2164(22" x 34")NORTH1 INCH = 20 FEETHORIZONTAL200 10 2040RCallbefore you dig.below.Know what's
HOUSEGARAGE60
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
909.3912.2EXISTING909.1909.2909.1909.0MBOX5CS
907.6911.13212908.9SPRUCE 63217908.8OAK 63218908.9OAK 63219909.2ASH 10CS910.2910.1SIGN3231909.5PINE 63232909.4COTTONWOOD 163233909.4OAK 8CS
909.4CS909.0CS909.33500909.9MAPLE303508910.3MAPLE223511907.8PINE163520907.2SPRUCE123523907.5SPRUCE163524909.1CRAB93571908.9MAPLE183572908.1MAPLE183578910.7MAPLE343610910.2CRAB10CO909.54SANSVC909.46MHSANHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEGARAGEHOUSEEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGE908.90MHSANSHEDEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEPORTABLESMOKE HOUSEEXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
0.60.53.5WEST FACE OFRETAINING WALL ONOR NEAR LOT LINE6.09.13.2FENCE8.37.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE909.2909.3EDGE OFLANDSCAPING910.7910.8REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA.NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS.NEW BOULEVARD TREE(SEE SPECIES LIST FORSUITABLE TREES)NEW BOULEVARD TREE(SEE SPECIES LIST FORSUITABLE TREES)EXISTING BOULEVARDTREE TO REMAINTREE PROTECTIONFENCING (TYP)EXISTING TREES SHALL BEPROTECTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH CITY TREE PROTECTIONFENCE DETAIL (GEN-27) - TYP.RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITHTEMPORARY SEED MIX - ONCE BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, LOTTO BE PROVIDED WITH SODGENERAL NOTES1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TOTYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESEUTILITIES.2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONSFOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THESTART OF INSTALLATIONS.4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES.5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS.6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ONPUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION.8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALLUTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITYCOMPANY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC.DENOTES FENCEDENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWERDENOTES EXISTING WATER MAINDENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEDENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEXXGASEDENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBLDENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEDENOTES HYDRANTDENOTES GAS METERDENOTES SIGNDENOTES CONCRETE SURFACEDENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACEDENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTALDENOTES CABLE PEDESTALDENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONDENOTES WELLDENOTES MAILBOXDENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXDENOTES ELECTRICAL BOXDENOTES EXISTING CONTOURSDENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNITDENOTES CLEAN OUTDENOTES CURB STOPDENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEX 952.36CECOCSSTWLEGENDDENOTES RETAINING WALLDENOTES PAVER SURFACES:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC1.3Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY24-2164(22" x 34")NORTH1 INCH = 20 FEETHORIZONTAL200 10 2040RCallbefore you dig.below.Know what'sBOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS.a. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS.b. BOULEVARD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT THE RATE OF ONE TREE PER LOT FRONTAGEFOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY LOTS. TOWNHOME AND MULTI-FAMILYPROPERTIES SHALL PROVIDE BOULEVARD TREES AT A RATE OF ONE TREE PER 70LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE WHERE PROPERTY FRONTS ANY PUBLICSTREET.c. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 14 FEET OF THE CURB LINE OR ASOTHERWISE DETERMINED BY THE CITY FORESTER.d. EXISTING TREES MAY BE USED TO FULFILL BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS AT THECITY'S DISCRETION.e. THE CITY MAY, AT ITS DISCRETION, PURCHASE AND INSTALL THE REQUIREDBOULEVARD TREES. IN SUCH CASE, THE CITY SHALL COLLECT A STANDARD FEEPER TREE. SAID FEE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND BASED ONTHE ESTIMATED MARKET RATE COST TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL TREES WITHINTHE DEVELOPMENT SITE.LANDSCAPING STANDARDSSOD AND GROUND COVERa. SEED MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF SOD IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CASES:a.1. WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED TO FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS AS SHOWN ONTHE APPROVED PLANS, ORa.2. WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED ADJACENT TO NATURAL AREAS OR WETLANDS.SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY, ORa.3. FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, PROPEREROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINEDUNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. SOD MAY BE REQUIRED IN AREASSUBJECT TO EROSION AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR CITYENGINEER.b. UNDISTURBED AREAS CONTAINING EXISTING VIABLE NATURAL VEGETATION WHICHCAN BE MAINTAINED FREE OF FOREIGN AND NOXIOUS PLANT MATERIALS.c. AREAS DESIGNATED AS OPEN SPACE OR FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS PROPERLYPLANTED AND MAINTAINED WITH NATIVE GRASSES OR WILD FLOWERS INDIGENOUSTO MINNESOTA. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY.d. USE OF MULCH MATERIALS SUCH AS BARK, WOOD CHIPS, AND DECORATIVE ROCKIN SUPPORT OF SHRUBS AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS.e. NATIVE LANDSCAPES IN COMPLIANCE WITH M.S. § 412.925.Large Deciduous Trees:Common Name: Scientific Name:Oak Quercus (all climatic Zone 4b or lessvarieties except Eastern p.worth)Maple Acer (all climatic Zone 4b or lessvarieties)Hackberry (Thornless)Celtis occidentalisBirch Betula (all climatic Zone 3 varieties)Honeylocust (Thornless) Gleditsia tricanthosLinden/Basswood (American and Little Leaf) Tilia (americana)Ginkgo (male tree only) Ginkgo bilobaKentucky Coffee Tree Gymnocladus dioicusDelaware American Elm Ulmus americana “Delaware”Robusta Poplar Populus X robustaNiobe Weeping Willow Salix X blandaHickory (Butternut) Carya cordiformisGinkgo Ginkgo bilobaElm (Disease resistant) Ulmus (Disease resistant varieties)Medium Deciduous Trees:Amur Cork Phellodendron amurenseOhio Buckeye Aesculus glabraSmall Deciduous Trees:Amur Chokecherry Prunus maackiiCrabapple Malus spp.Hawthorn CrataegusIronwood Ostrya virginianaAmerican Hornbeam Carpinus carolinianaEvergreen Trees:Fir Abies (all climatic Zone 3 varieties / Pseudotsuga)Spruce Picea (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties)Pine Pinus (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties)Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensisEuropean Larch Larix deciduaCedar Cedrus (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties)Eastern Larch Larix laricinaTHE TREE PROTECTION ZONES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OFGRADING PERMIT AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY STAFF CONCURRENTLY WITHINSPECTION OF SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.DESCRIPTION10.15.24
HOUSEGARAGE60
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
909.3912.2EXISTING909.1909.2909.1909.0MBOX5CS
907.6911.1CS910.2910.1SIGNCS
909.4CS909.0CS909.3CO909.54SANSVC909.46MHSANHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEGARAGEHOUSEEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGE908.90MHSANSHEDEXISTINGHOUSEEXISTINGGARAGEPORTABLESMOKE HOUSEEXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY
0.60.53.5WEST FACE OFRETAINING WALL ONOR NEAR LOT LINE6.09.13.2FENCE8.37.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE909.2909.3EDGE OFLANDSCAPING910.7910.8REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA.NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS.RAISE CURB STOP TO MATCH NEWGROUND ELEVATIONRAISE CURB STOP TO MATCHNEW GROUND ELEVATIONLOTS 2 AND 3 TO USE EXISTINGSANITARY SEWER AND WATERSERVICES PROVIDED IN ARLO LANEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING HYDRANTEXIST SAN MHRE 908.90IE 902.29(NOT FIELD VER.)EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" WATERMAINEXIST SAN MHRE 909.46IE 902.35(NOT FIELD VER.)EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" WATERMAINEXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATER SERVICE AND 4" PVCSCHEDULE 40 SEWER SERVICE (APPROX. LOC.)EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATERSERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40SEWER SERVICE (~INV 904.0)EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATERSERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40SEWER SERVICE (~INV 903.7)EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATERSERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40SEWER SERVICELOW FLOOR 909.40LOW FLOOR 909.40SANITARY SEWER SERVICE MAYNEED INSULATION AT TIMEOF BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONSANITARY SEWER SERVICE MAYNEED INSULATION AT TIMEOF BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONLOW FLOOR ~908.8GENERAL NOTES1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TOTYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESEUTILITIES.2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONSFOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THESTART OF INSTALLATIONS.4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES.5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS.6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ONPUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION.8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALLUTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITYCOMPANY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC.DENOTES FENCEDENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWERDENOTES EXISTING WATER MAINDENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEDENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEXXGASEDENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBLDENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINEDENOTES HYDRANTDENOTES GAS METERDENOTES SIGNDENOTES CONCRETE SURFACEDENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACEDENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTALDENOTES CABLE PEDESTALDENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONDENOTES WELLDENOTES MAILBOXDENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOXDENOTES ELECTRICAL BOXDENOTES EXISTING CONTOURSDENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNITDENOTES CLEAN OUTDENOTES CURB STOPDENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEX 952.36CECOCSSTWLEGENDDENOTES RETAINING WALLDENOTES PAVER SURFACES:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC2.1Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
UTILITY PLAN PRELIMINARY24-2164(22" x 34")NORTH1 INCH = 20 FEETHORIZONTAL200 10 2040RCallbefore you dig.below.Know what'sDESCRIPTION10.15.24
S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWGTuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PMFAX: (651) 361-8701
PHONE: (651) 361-8210
LINO LAKES, MN 55014
6776 LAKE DRIVE
SUITE 110
SITE PLANNING
& ENGINEERING
PLOWE
ENGINEERING, INC.
PREPARED FOR: ME SPARGUR INC.
SPARGUR ESTATES
LINO LAKES, MN
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
3
MQA
AG
CHECK BY:
DRAWN BY:
24-2164
DATE:
JOB NO:
09/06/24DESCRIPTIONDATENO.SHEETC3.1Date: License No. 43963
ADAM GINKEL
10.15.2024
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
DETAILS PRELIMINARY24-21642' (MIN.)WHITE FLAGGING (TYP)PLANDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILN.T.S.NOTES:1. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLYCROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN ORDEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERALBRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THETERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OFTHE CROWN.2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO KEEP TREESTRAIGHT AND PLUM.3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" WHITE PVC TRUNKGUARD AT TIME OF PLANTINGMARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATETREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLEWOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THEMULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTINGTREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS:1. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP-HALFOF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE.2. REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND HORIZONTAL WIREFROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE.3. EXPOSE ROOT FLARE SO THAT IT IS VISIBLY AT GRADE TO ENSURETREES ARE INSTALLED AT PROPER DEPTH, AND THAT MULCH ISPULLED BACK 3 INCHES FROM THE TRUCK (I.E. MULCH IS NOTTOUCHING THE TRUNK.)4. IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL,CUT THE WIRE BASKET OFF AND REMOVE. DISPOSE OFF OFF-SITE5. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE ON 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWDRAINING SOILS.6. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE ISVISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLAREIS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL WITH SOIL.NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASSTREE STAKES, 11/16" X 6'-0"4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY).REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, ANDBURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALLPLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. ENSURE NEWPLANT HOLES PASS THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION TESTTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOTPRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.DOUBLE STAKE WITH POLYPROPYLENE WEBBING THROUGH THE EYEOF THE CINCH-TIE RUBBER SUPPORT. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOTBALL WITH SUPPORT STAKESDESCRIPTION10.15.24
178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner
From: Kris Keller PE, WSB
Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer
Date: November 6, 2024
Re: Spargur Estates
Preliminary Plat & Civil Plan Review
026728-000
As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans for Spargur
Estates Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received October 15,
2024. Our comments were made on the following documents:
•Spargur Estates – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated October 15, 2024.
•Spargur Estates – Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations prepared by Plowe
Engineering, revised October 15, 2024.
•Spargur Estates – Certificate of Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated October 15,
2024.
•Spargur Estates – Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated October 15, 2024.
The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are
additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline
comments are in the review memo.
Plowe (10/15//2024) Responses in red.
WSB (11/6/2024) responses and new comments in blue.
Engineering
•Grading
The Spargur Estates Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to
create three (3) single-family lots and a narrow infiltration basin. The infiltration basin
treats the rear and some front drainage from the four lots while the remaining drainage
flows to Arlo Lane to the north or Lois Lane to the south.
Comments:
1.Maintain 2% positive slope through Arlo Lane boulevard/right of way
(Plowe 10/15//24) The grading plan has been revised to show a positive
slope (2%) to the curb line through the Arlo Ln R/W and most of the lot
frontages
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
2.There is an existing low area at the northeast rear corner of Lot 1 near the
fire pit
Attachment 3: City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/6/2024
Page 2
Spargur Estates Engineering Review
•Consider filling low area to reduce standing water in a rain event
(Plowe 10/15//24) It appears that with some revised grading, there is a
positive slope to the east.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
3. Provide information or a detail for any special construction or soil information
for 2’ drainage ditches
(Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is
to be removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend.
(WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment
•Ditches will need to demonstrate permeable material
(Plowe 10/15//24) A boring in the ditch location shows SP-SM soils which
are generally silty sands.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Recommend digging down to permeable soils and installing sand/compost
mix to final grade to better promote infiltration and reduce standing water in
a rain event
(Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is to be
removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend.
(WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment
4.Provide ditch High Water Level (HWL) on plans
(Plowe 10/15//24) The basin’s HWL has been noted on the plans.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
5.Relocate existing shed outside of 5' easement/setback
(Plowe 10/15//24) It is noted that the shed (a portable smokehouse) will be
moved outside of the drainage and utility easement and 5-ft setback.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
6.Relocate existing fire pit outside of 20' distance from property line and 25'
distance from structures
(Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the fire pit should
be moved to meet the above required distances.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
7.The current 906.8 'berm' near the southeast corner of Lot 4 would spill over
the 906.5 spot elevation on the eastern property line
•Raise berm and initial EOF to east to 907.2 (Basin to the east is 'land-
locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west)
(Plowe 10/15//24) Berm has been raised as requested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•EOF for basin to the east is towards this development and would be at
907.2
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/6/2024
Page 3
Spargur Estates Engineering Review
(Plowe 10/15//24) Noted
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•The highpoint on the east side at the front of Lot 4 would become the
secondary EOF for the existing basin to the east when inundated.
(Plowe 10/15//24) Noted
(WSB 11/6/24) Previous 908.7 EOF acted as a secondary EOF for the
adjacent developments to the east and west and must be maintained
(Basin to the east is 'land-locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west).
1 Areas along the side property line can be filled to improve
drainage swales but the 908.7 EOF must be maintained
2 Adjacent grading should be contained to drainage and
utility easements
3 Grading on adjacent property must be coordinated and
approved by the adjacent property owner
4 Provide written documentation to the City prior to
construction
•(WSB 11/6/24) The Lowest Opening Elevation (LOE) of Lots 2 and 3 must
be at least 910.7 to maintain minimum freeboard with the EOF (908.7)
1 The Lowest Floor elevation must be a minimum 909.4
(SELO)
•Stormwater Management
Stormwater management for the site consists of a small read yard depression. However,
based on site layout, stormwater management is not required under City ordinance.
Comments on the proposed stormwater design are offered below.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt
Existing 0.62 1.70 4.17 Not required
Proposed 1.27 2.80 6.43 Not required
Comments:
1.There are minor increases in site runoff rates due to the new impervious.
However, as stormwater management requirements are not triggered, these
increases are not regulated. Runoff to the north and south will be captured
by storm sewer routing to City ponds.
(Plowe 10/15//24) Noted.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
2.Sufficient freeboard is available between the depression modeled HWL and
the proposed household low floors/low entries.
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/6/2024
Page 4
Spargur Estates Engineering Review
(Plowe 10/15//24) Per client request, the units shown are now split-entry
walkouts; these low floors had to be raised to meet the 2-ft freeboard
requirement.
(WSB 11/6/24) The revised lowest openings for Lots 2 and 3 no longer meet
minimum freeboard requirements with the adjacent EOFs (909.5+).
It is necessary to maintain
3.Silt fence or bioroll is recommended around the rear yard depression to
maintain infiltration capacity and reduce likelihood of excess ponding in the
future.
(Plowe 10/15//24) Biorolls have been added as suggested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Water Supply
The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services
extended to the lots.
Comments:
1.Show the existing well for Lot 1 if present
•Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 1 per MDH requirements with
construction
(Plowe 10/15//24) The existing well was sealed multiple years ago.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation use
if MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services
(Plowe 10/15//24) N/A
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewer
and water service stubs with construction
(Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate locations have been shown.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Water service stub is 1" copper (Type K)
•Show existing water service from main to house if present
3.Show existing water stubs to all lots as 1" copper (Type K)
(Plowe 10/15//24) Water services have been labeled as requested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Sanitary Sewer
The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by existing 4-inch diameter Schedule 40
PVC gravity service pipes extended to the lots from Arlo Lane (Lots 2 and 3). The existing
lot (Lot 1) has been previously connected to a service in Lois Lane.
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/6/2024
Page 5
Spargur Estates Engineering Review
Comments:
1.Show septic system for existing house (Lot 1) if present
•Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with
construction
(Plowe 10/15//24) The septic system was removed multiple years ago.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewer
and water service stubs with construction
•Sanitary sewer service stub is 4" PVC SCH 40
(Plowe 10/15//24) Labeled as requested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Show existing sanitary sewer service from main to house if present
(Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate location has been shown.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
3.Show existing sanitary sewer stubs to all lots as 4” PVC Schedule 40
(Plowe 10/15//24) Sewer services have been labeled as requested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
4.Provide low floor information for all lots on utility plan
(Plowe 10/15//24) Low floor information has been added to the plan. Note
that the existing house low floor was estimated based on known first floor
elevation. A Darcy’s Law calculation has been added to the drainage
narrative to demonstrate that the low floor is protected.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
5.Add note that the sanitary sewer service may require insulation at the time of
building construction and connection
(Plowe 10/15//24) Note added as requested.
(WSB 11/6/24) Complete
•Transportation
There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing
single-family lot into four smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly
more traffic.
•Trails and sidewalks
There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with
none being proposed
•Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
There are no wetlands identified on the site
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/6/2024
Page 6
Spargur Estates Engineering Review
•Landscaping
The Spargus Estates Landscape Plan has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and
the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate
comments.
•Floodplain
The Spargus Estates subdivision does not impact floodplain.
•Drainage and Utility Easements
The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single-
family lot (10’ front; 5’ sides). Additional easements need to be added around the
perimeter of the smaller lots (10’ front and back; 5’ sides).
•Development Agreement
A development agreement will be required with the final plat.
•Grading Agreement
No grading agreement is required for this site.
•Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
No stormwater maintenance agreement is required for this site.
•Permits Required
1.Rice Creek Watershed District Erosion Control Permit
2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction
If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris
Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner
From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
Date: November 1, 2024
Re: Environmental Comments – Spargur Estates
Environmental Board had recommended the following at their September 25, 2024 meeting:
1.Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) for the 17 trees scheduled for preservation must be
shown to scale on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1),
and the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance
of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of
sediment and erosion control measures.
2.Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (C1.1) should be updated to identify
location of rock construction entrance(s) and silt fence around perimeter of site
unless otherwise directed by City Engineer.
a.Rock construction entrance not shown for lot 3. Update sheet C1.1 to
identify rock construction entrance.
b.Add a note to phase 1 on C1.1 to include street sweeping of adjacent
impervious as directed by the city engineer.
c.Provide inlet protect on the 2 catch basin on Arlo Ln adjacent to the
project location.
d.Plan currently shows silt fence extending through lot three and onto
neighboring property. Confirm appropriate permissions have been
granted to install the fence on this property or remove the silt fence past
the property line.
3.Replace note on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan about installing
“Tree Protection as Applicable” with “Tree Protection Fence installed in
accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail”.
Environmental Memo
Attachment 4: Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024
Page 2
4.The Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3) should include a note regarding protecting trees
in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail. City Tree Protection detail
should be added to Sheet C1.3.
5.Ground cover type locations must be added to the Grading, Drainage, and
Erosion Control Plan (C1.1) and Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). This includes cover
type for all exposed soil areas (ex: sod for the lots,).
a.Call seed mix type and stabilization method for temporary stabilization as
called out in the plans. Plans state temporary stabilization to be
completed.
b.On sheet C1.3 provide crossing hatching or shading to show which areas
are receiving each type of seed mix or sod.
i.Remove seed mixes from legend that are not being proposed.
c.Provide seeding information for the proposed infiltration basin.
1
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Kendra Lindahl and Kevin Shay, Landform
P & Z MEETING DATE: November 13, 2024
REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Colonial Woods Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
CASE NUMBER: CP2024-001
APPLICANTS: City of Lino Lakes
OWNERS: Multiple
REVIEW SCHEDULE:
Complete Application Date: October 14, 2024
P & Z Board Meeting: November 13, 2024
City Council Work Session December 2, 2024
City Council Meeting: December 9, 2024
60-Day Review Date:N/A
BACKGROUND
The City of Lino Lakes has initiated a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for land located east of
Hodgson Road, north of 62nd Street North and south of Birch Street. The area is an existing
residential neighborhood with 29 homes known as Colonial Woods. A majority of the property
owners petitioned for the extension of sewer service, which requires a comprehensive plan
amendment, as part of the City’s proposed street reconstruction project. The 2040
Comprehensive Plan includes a Full Build Land Use Plan and a 2040 Land Use plan. The Full
Build plan guides the area as low density residential, and the 2040 Future Land Use plan shows
the area as Urban Reserve. To provide sanitary sewer, the 2040 Land Use plan will need to be
amended to match the Full Build Land Use Plan. The 2040 Utility Staging Plan also needs to be
amended to change from Stage 3 Planned Service Area to Stage 1A Planned Service Area.
ANALYSIS
We have reviewed the application for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as City
policies.
2
Existing Conditions
The 29 subject parcels are owned by multiple parties. The parcels are developed with single
family homes. The area is currently served by onsite septic systems and private wells. Septic
systems within the project area have an average age of 35 years. Most systems are original to
the construction date of the homes with four replaced in the last 10 years.
The City published notice of the proposed change in the official newspaper and mailed notice to
the property owners whose property is proposed to be reclassified.
Land Use Amendment
One change from the 2040 Land Use Plan is proposed:
1. 39 acres will be reclassified from Urban Reserve to Low Density Residential.
Staging Plan Amendment
One change to the 2040 Staging Plan is proposed:
1. 39 acres will be changed from Stage 3 Planned Service Area to Stage 1A Planned Service
Area on the Utility Staging Map.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed amendments are supported by and consistent with the Land Use
(Chapter 3) goals and policies as noted below:
Existing Unsewered Single-Family Subdivisions
The urbanized area of the City of Lino Lakes surrounds several large-lot single family
subdivisions that are not connected to the public sewer and water systems. These pockets of
homes use subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) and some use private wells. The Utility
Staging Plan maps these areas in Staging Area 3. Even though the staging plan indicates that
these areas will not receive service within the 20-year span of the plan, it is the city’s policy to
extend public utilities to these neighborhoods when either requested by the homeowners or
when necessary to replace failing SSTS, to preserve and maintain existing neighborhoods. The
city’s sewer and water systems have been designed to serve these areas.
As part of the Staging Plan update, the city considered changing these neighborhoods to Stage
1A on the 2040 Staging Plan and changing them from “Urban Reserve” to “Low Density
Residential” on the Land Use Plan Maps. Including them in the staging plan would remove an
extra bureaucratic step (a Comprehensive Plan Amendment) from the process of extending
3
utility service. However, the Metropolitan Council’s formulas for calculating compliance with
regional density policies would penalize the city for including these existing neighborhoods
unless there is current documentation of SSTS failures. Therefore, case-by-case plan
amendments will be necessary before service can be extended to these existing neighborhoods.
1. The City will create a fully integrated Comprehensive Plan and keep it up to date with
biannual reviews. The City will perform an intensive review at least once every five years to
ensure the plan addresses changing needs and conditions.
The need for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to provide municipal services has been
petitioned by the residents. The amendment will allow utilities to be provided to replace failing
septic systems and wells.
2. The Comprehensive Plan will include a staging plan defining development staging areas sized
to accommodate forecasted growth.
The proposed amendment to the staging plan will allow the land to be brought into the current
staging plan phase. The adjacent areas to the north, south and east are all in the current staging
area.
3. The City will monitor the ten-year staging areas and annually determine if adequate land
remains available.
The City is comfortable that with the proposed amendment adequate land remain available in
the staging areas.
4. All development must be located within the current ten-year staging area unless a
Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved that redefines the current ten-year staging
area.
If approved as proposed the amendments would bring the area into the current staging area to
allow utility services to be provided.
5. All development must be phased within each ten-year staging area in accordance with the
staging plan unless the City Council determines, by resolution, to redefine the location of the
current five-year phase.
No development is proposed outside of the current staging area.
6. Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next ten-year staging area, or five-year phase
within a ten-year staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will determine
by resolution if the next area is to be opened to development. The following criteria will be
used to determine where and when to open up the next ten-year staging area, or five-year
phase within a staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on the staging plan:
4
a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate
analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions
and transportation improvements are required to support new development. If
infrastructure is not available and cannot be made available in a timely manner to
support expanding into the next ten-year staging area or five year phase within a
staging area, the city may refrain from opening up the next staging area, or portions
thereof.
b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one
area of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the city.
Decisions to open new areas to development should clearly define and map the area
being opened.
c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in
accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan.
Staff finds that adequate infrastructure can be provided to serve these areas in conjunction
with a formal development proposal. Infrastructure and utility improvements as identified in
the Comprehensive Plan will be required to be installed by the developer when development is
proposed following a detailed analysis by City staff as a recommendation to the City Council.
7. The following criteria will be used to determine if the city should allow a specific development
project to occur early in a ten-year staging area, or five-year phase within a staging area, prior
to the timing indicated on the staging plan.
a. The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next ten
year staging area, or five-year phase, or located adjacent to the current staging area.
b. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments
do
not justify redefining the ten-year staging area, or five-year phase.
c. The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values.
d. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate
analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions
and transportation improvements are required to support new development.
e. There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of
infrastructure improvement costs associated with development.
Not applicable.
8.All development must adhere to the Greenway System plan, including all its components, as
this plan provides a conservation design framework for growth within the city.
This request will adhere to the Greenway System Plan.
9. Include standards in subsequent ordinance updates to ensure quality development that
minimizes negative impacts on natural and cultural features of the community.
5
Not applicable.
10. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5 year
phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 year phasing
period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year phase.
Not Applicable. The proposed area includes developed parcels and no new development would
occur with the amendment.
Findings of Fact
The following are Findings of Fact for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
1.The proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendments are needed to provide municipal
services to existing residents of the City.
2.The proposed land use and staging plan changes are consistent with the policy text for
the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
3.The proposed amendment is consistent with Sanitary Sewer Plan planned infrastructure
improvements and simply allows those improvements to occur earlier.
4.The proposed amendment is consistent with Water Supply Plan planned infrastructure
improvements and simply allows those improvements to occur earlier.
Next Steps
1.If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the City, it will be submitted to
the Metropolitan Council for review.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Colonial Woods Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan
Amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
1.Existing and Proposed 2040 Future Land Use Map
2.Existing and Proposed Utility Staging Map
Reshanau LakeReshanau Lake
Birch St
62nd St N
Ash St
City of Shoreview White Bear Township
COLONNIAL WOODS
1,000 0 1,000500
Feet ±
Date: 11/5/2024 Time: 1:16:05 PM User: LPSremote
Permanent Rural
Urban Reserve
Low Density Residential
Low Density Mixed Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Planned Residential / Commercial
Office Residential
Signature Gateway District
Commercial
Town Center
Business Campus
Industrial
Civic and Institutional
Parks and Open Space
Private Airfield
Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014)
Reshanau LakeReshanau Lake
Birch St
62nd St N
Ash St
City of Shoreview White Bear Township
Existing ProposedAttachment 1: Existing & Proposed 2040 Future Land Use Map
Reshanau LakeReshanau Lake
Birch St
62nd St N
Ash St
City of Shoreview White Bear Township
COLONNIAL WOODS
1,000 0 1,000500
Feet ±
Date: 11/5/2024 Time: 12:46:10 PM User: LPSremote
STAGE
Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2018 - 2025)
Stage 1B Planned Service Area (2025 - 2030)
Stage 2A Planned Service Area (2030 - 2035)
Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2035 - 2040)
Stage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2040)
No Service
Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014)
Reshanau LakeReshanau Lake
Birch St
62nd St N
Ash St
City of Shoreview White Bear Township
Existing ProposedAttachment 2: Existing & Proposed Utility Staging Map
1
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
P & Z MEETING DATE: November 13, 2024
REQUEST: Lyngblomsten PUD Concept Plan #2-Skilled Nursing Home
CASE NUMBER: PD2023-002
APPLICANT: Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC
Attn: Jeff Heinecke
1415 Almond Avenue
St Paul, MN 55108
OWNER: Same
REVIEW SCHEDULE:
Complete Application Date: October 11, 2024
60-Day Deadline: December 10, 2024
Environmental Board Meeting: N/A
Park Board Meeting: N/A
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: November 13, 2024
City Council Work Session: December 2, 2024
City Council Meeting: N/A
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for PUD
Concept Plan #2. They are requesting an amendment to the PUD Development Stage Plan and
PUD Final Plan (“PUD Plan”) to change the 2-story skilled nursing home to a 3-story building.
The property address is 6070 Blanchard Boulevard.
This is concept plan review only. If the Board and Council support the proposed amendment,
the applicant will formally submit an amendment to the PUD Plan.
This staff report is based on review the following plan sets and documents:
• Applicant Narrative received October 10, 2024
2
• PUD Concept Plan-Overall Plans
• 3D Rendering
Previous Council Action
• April 8, 2019: Ordinance No. 07-19 rezoning property from GB, General Business to PUD,
Planned Unit Development
o Details permitted, accessory, conditional and administrative uses specific to the
20 acre site
• April 8, 2019: Resolution No. 19-42 approving PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary
Plat
o Establishes development’s framework regarding lot and yard requirements,
height regulations, impervious surface and design guidelines
• May 11, 2020: Resolution No. 20-44 approving PUD Development Stage Plan
Amendment #1-Site Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan
o This amendment omitted the clubhouse and revised the site plan and grading &
drainage plans
• July 26, 2021: Resolution No. 20-94 approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
• December 11, 2023: Resolution No. 23-126 approving PUD Amendment #2-North Lot
Line Fence and Pickleball Court
o This amendment omitted the north lot line fence in lieu of additional landscaping
and allowed for the construction of a pickleball court in the southwest corner of
the site.
ANALYSIS
The following chart compares the Original PUD Plan with the Proposed PUD Amendment
regarding the skilled nursing home. The proposed 3-story building height would be the same as
the existing 3-story assisted living & memory care facility on the south side of the building. The
amendment also includes a new 20 space surface parking lot. See attached Applicant Narrative
for additional information.
Original 2021 PUD Plan Proposed PUD Plan Amendment
Building Height
2-story
23’3” (top of wall) + 4’11”
(parapet) = 28’2” total
3-story
35’10” (top of wall) + 2’4”
(parapet) = 38’2” total
Building Footprint 17,800 sf 12,540 ft
Total Square Footage 51,780 sf 48,888 ft
# Units 56 57
Density
3
Per Met Council, skilled nursing facilities/units are not counted toward a community’s net
residential density so the overall Lyngblomsten development’s density will not change with the
one (1) unit increase.
Setbacks
The skilled nursing home addition and parking lot shall meet setback requirements as detailed
in Resolution No. 19-42. The minimum building setback along Blanchard Boulevard is 10ft. The
proposed addition setback appears to be 6ft and within the existing drainage & utility
easement. The minimum parking lot setback along Blanchard Boulevard is 15ft. The proposed
parking lot setback appears to be 3ft and within the existing drainage & utility easement.
The conditions of previously approved resolutions and ordinances are still in effect.
PUD Concept Plan Review
The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive Plan and
development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as
depicted by the concept plan.
If the Board and Council support the proposed amendment, the applicant will formally submit
an amendment to the PUD Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff seeks input from the Planning & Zoning Board regarding the proposed amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Applicant’s Narrative
2. Original PUD Site Plan
3. Proposed PUD Amendment Site Plan
4. Original 3D Rendering
5. Proposed 3D Rendering
6. Engineering Memo dated November 6, 2024
Introduction
This narrative accompanies an application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
amendment for a skilled nursing home facility located at 6070 Blanchard Boulevard, Lino
Lakes, MN. The amendment seeks approval to modify the original proposal from a two-
story, 51,780 square-foot building with 56 units to a three-story, 48,888 square-foot
building with 57 units. The revised design maintains the essential character and intent of
the original proposal while improving the eMiciency of land use and enhancing the facility’s
capacity to serve the community.
Background
The original PUD, allowed for the development of a two -story skilled nursing home,
providing 56 units across a gross floor area of 51,780 square feet. Since that time, further
design evaluations and market studies have led to the conclusion that a three-story design
oMers significant benefits in terms of operational eMiciency, improved patient care, and
environmental sustainability, while enhancing the quality of life for residents.
Proposed Amendment
This amendment requests the following changes to the original PUD:
•Building Height: Increase from a two-story to a three-story structure.
Despite the increase in height, the total building footprint will be reduced, allowing for
improved land use and the preservation of more open space on the site. The modest
increase in the number of units aligns with the community’s growing demand for skilled
nursing services and is accomplished without compromising privacy, comfort, or
accessibility for residents.
Rationale for the Amendment
1.E;icient Land Use: The three-story structure allows for a more compact building
footprint, reducing the overall land disturbance. This configuration opens up more
area for landscaping, recreational spaces, and other site amenities that will
enhance the quality of life for residents.
2.Sustainability: A smaller footprint reduces impervious surface area, supporting
better stormwater management and potentially lowering energy consumption. The
vertical design also improves natural ventilation and daylighting opportunities within
the building, contributing to energy eMiciency.
3.Improved Operational Flow: The three-story design allows for a more optimized
internal layout, improving operational eMiciency. By stacking the units vertically,
staM can move more eMiciently between floors, enhancing response times and
facilitating patient care.
4.Aesthetic and Compatibility: The new design will be carefully integrated into the
surrounding community, with architectural features that blend with the existing
buidling character. The building’s height and massing have been thoughtfully
considered to minimize visual impact, and the reduction in total square footage
further helps in keeping the overall bulk of the building compatible with adjacent
properties.
Impact on Surrounding Areas
The proposed changes will have minimal impact on the surrounding areas:
Attachment 1: Applicant's Narrative
•Tra;ic : The increase in units is modest and will not significantly increase traMic
volumes. Moreover, the new design incorporates better circulation for service
vehicles and staM.
•Utilities: The revised design will not place additional strain on existing
infrastructure. In fact, the reduced square footage may slightly decrease utility
demands.
Conclusion
The proposed amendment to the PUD reflects careful planning and consideration of
community needs, sustainability, and eMicient use of space. The transition to a three-story,
48,888 square-foot facility with 57 units oMers multiple benefits, including enhanced
operational flow, a smaller building footprint, and improved land use. We respectfully
request approval of this amendment, as it will allow us to continue our commitment to
providing high-quality care to our residents while positively contributing to the surrounding
community.
Attachments
•Revised site plan
•Architectural renderings
18"30"24"33"30"30"36"27"18"15"36"18"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"18"36"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"18"30"18"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30" 30"30"30"30"30"33"30" 30"30"30"30"27"15"15"18"18"18"18"18"18" 18"18"18"18"18"18"12"18"33"30"30" 30"30"30"30"30"26272046641226175NOPARKING
NOPARKING
NOPARKING NOPARKING
21.86'103.26'LOT 4LOT 3LOT 1LOT 17LOT12PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33DRY BASIN 4PLOT 6LOT 5LOT 20LOT 2LOT 7LOT 19LOT 14LOT 16LOT 15LOT 8LOT13LOT11POND 3P NORTH PONDLOT 9LOT 10LOT 18E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson RoadAsh Street(County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)Centerline of Hodgson Rd. per MNDOTNotes Project SP 0204-4711 Dated 04-92E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson RoadAsh Street(County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)Centerline of Hodgson Rd. per MNDOTNotes Project SP 0204-4711 Dated 04-92E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson RoadAsh Street(County Road J)Hodgson Road(C.S.A.H. No. 32)(State Trunk Hwy No.49)(FKA Hwy. 29)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)Centerline of Hodgson Rd. per MNDOTNotes Project SP 0204-4711 Dated 04-92SKILLED CARE2 STORYASSISTED LIVING & MEMORY CARE3 STORYTOWN CENTER & INDEPENDENT LIVING4 STORYINDEPENDENT LIVING4 STORYSKILLED CARE ENTRY & TOWN CENTER & INDEPENDENT LIVING4 STORYMAIN ENTRYWELLNESS CENTERCOURTYARDPARKING GARAGE ENTRY & LOADING DOCKRETAILRESTUARANTTOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMEMONUMENT SIGN, SEE SITELAYOUT PLAN - L1.0 FOR LOCATION CAMPUS SUMMARY:96 INDEPENDENT LIVING (IL) UNITS35 ASSISTED LIVING (AL) UNITS16 MEMORY CARE (MC) UNITS56 SKILLED CARE (SNF) UNITS20 TOWNHOMESMAIN BUILDING GSF: 287,055 SF (INCLUDING BASEMENT)TOWNHOME SF: 1,480 SFPARKING STALL COUNTS:REFER TO CIVIL SHEET: SITE PLAN OVERALL - C1.20FAST FOOD RESTUARANT221 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104223 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104229 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104231 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104233 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104239 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104241 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104245 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104251 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104253 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104255 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104255 ASH STREETLINO LAKES, MN 55104MONUMENT SIGNFEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:License Number:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofScale:Date5/11/2020 7:33:40 AMC:\Users\gberens\Documents\186024 - Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central - 2019_CITYSUBMITTAL_gberens@woldae.com.rvt1" = 50'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - LyngblomstenLino Lakes Central - 2019_CITY SUBMITTAL.rvtLyngblomstenLyngblomsten LinoLakes CampusA2SITE PLAN1415 Almond Avenue,Saint Paul, MN 55108CheckerAuthor10/4/19196015MINNESOTA10/4/19RICK J. MOORE14836ARCHITECTRevisionsDescriptionDateNumPUD Submittal10/08/20181PUD Resubmittal01/14/20192PUD Resubmittal03/11/20193DD SET06/28/20194CD CHECK SET08/30/20195CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/20196CD SET10/04/20197PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020801" = 50'-0"SITE PLANF337'-6"75', SEE SHEET SIGNAGE EXTERIOR, A17Attachment 2: Original PUD Site Plan
18"30"24"33"30"30"36"27"18"15"36"18"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"18"36"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"18"30"18"30"30"30"30"30"30"30"30" 30"30"30"30"30"33"30" 30"30"30"30"27"15"15"18"18"18"18"18"18" 18"18"18"18"18"18"12"18"33"30"30" 30"30"30"30"30"26272046641226175NO
PARKING
NOPARKING
NOPARKING NO
PARKING
21.86'103.26'LOT 4LOT 3LOT 1LOT 17LOT12PROPOSED 100YR HWL = 900.33DRY BASIN 4PLOT 6LOT 5LOT 20LOT 2LOT 7LOT 19LOT 14LOT 16LOT 15LOT 8LOT13LOT11POND 3P NORTH PONDLOT 9LOT 10LOT 18E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson Road(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson Road(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)E xisting
H o use
E xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting H o useE xisting
H ou seE xistin gH ou seE xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use
E xistin gH o use ExistingHouseExisting
House Hodgson Road(Publicly Traveled Roadway)(Publicly Traveled Roadway)ASSISTED LIVING & MEMORY CARE3 STORYTOWN CENTER & INDEPENDENT LIVING4 STORYINDEPENDENT LIVING4 STORYMAIN ENTRYWELLNESS CENTERCOURTYARDPARKING GARAGE ENTRY & LOADING DOCKRETAILRESTUARANTTOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMETOWN HOMECAMPUS SUMMARY:96 INDEPENDENT LIVING (IL) UNITS35 ASSISTED LIVING (AL) UNITS16 MEMORY CARE (MC) UNITS20 TOWNHOMESMAIN BUILDING GSF: 287,055 SF (INCLUDING BASEMENT)TOWNHOME SF: 1,480 SFPARKING STALL COUNTS:REFER TO CIVIL SHEET: SITE PLAN OVERALL - C1.20FAST FOOD RESTUARANT221 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104223 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104229 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104231 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104233 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104239 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104241 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104245 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104251 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104253 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104255 WOODRIDGE LANELINO LAKES, MN 55104255 ASH STREETLINO LAKES, MN 55104FEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:5/11/2020 7:33:40 AMC:\Users\gberens\Documents\186024 - Lyngblomsten Lino Lakes Central - 2019_CITYSUBMITTAL_gberens@woldae.com.rvt1" = 50'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\_HCSL\Lyngblomsten\186024 Lino Lakes\_Revit\186024 - LyngblomstenLino Lakes Central - 2019_CITY SUBMITTAL.rvtLyngblomstenLyngblomsten LinoLakes CampusA2SITE PLAN1415 Almond Avenue,Saint Paul, MN 55108CheckerAuthor10/4/19196015RevisionsDescriptionDateNumPUD Submittal10/08/20181PUD Resubmittal01/14/20192PUD Resubmittal03/11/20193DD SET06/28/20194CD CHECK SET08/30/20195CD QAQC CHECK SET 09/22/20196CD SET10/04/20197PUD DEV STAGE RESUB 05/11/2020801" = 50'-0"SITE PLANF337'-6"75'DI22 SFNITSSKILLED CARE 3 STORYNEWSURFACEPARKINGUTILIZE EXISTINGPARKINGENTRANCESKILLEDCARE SITE Attachment 3: Proposed PUD Amendment Site Plan
Attachment 4: Original 3D Rendering
Attachment 5: Proposed 3D Rendering
178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner
From: Kris Keller PE, WSB
Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer
Date: November 6, 2024
Re: Lyngblomsten Nursing Home – Skilled Nursing Addition
Concept Plan Review
027097-000
WSB’s review of the Concept Plans for the Lyngblomsten Nursing Home Addition in Lino Lakes,
MN, prepared by Wold and received October 10, 2024. Our comments were made on the
following documents:
•Lyngblomsten – Skilled Nursing Addition Concept Plan prepared by Wold, dated
September 10, 2024.
The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant.
Engineering
•General
The Lyngblomsten Nursing Home is proposing a skilled nursing wing to their campus
located west of Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and south of Blanchard Boulevard. It is a 12,000
SF addition to their 290,000 SF main building and includes 57 private rooms together with
offices, conference rooms and both an underground and outdoor parking areas.
•Grading
The Lyngblomsten Nursing Home Campus addition includes limited site grading for the
building outdoor parking area and blending into the streets and driveways. The lot was
rough-graded with the grading of the overall campus. A grading plan meeting City
requirements will need to be submitted as part of the preliminary and final plats.
•Stormwater Management
Additional onsite treatment will not be required as the existing ponding areas were designed
for drainage from this area. It is presumed that conveyance to these basins will be through
an internal storm sewer system and overland swales. The system shall meet the City’s and
RCWD Stormwater Management requirements.
Attachment 6: Engineering Memo
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/06/2024
Page 2
Lyngblomsten Nursing Home – Skilled Nursing Addition - Engineering Review
•Water Supply/Sanitary Sewer
A detailed utility plan for the Lyngblomsten Nursing Home Campus addition has not yet been
proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. There are
existing 6” sanitary sewer and water stubs to the lot. The number of units and demand is
within the anticipated capacity of the original campus design for the area and is supported
with the existing infrastructure.
•Transportation
Traffic from the addition is consistent to what was approved with the preliminary plat for
the overall campus traffic study. Underground parking will utilize the existing entrance
drive on the south side of the general building while the outdoor parking area will utilize a
connection to the existing entrance drive off of Blanchard Boulevard on the west side of
the general building.
Trails and sidewalks
Additional trails/ sidewalks are not proposed on the submitted Concept Plan as all
required ones have already been installed with previous phases of the overall campus
construction.
•Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
No wetlands are proposed to be impacted with the proposed addition.
•Landscaping
A Landscape Plan for the Lyngblomsten Nursing Home Campus addition has not yet been
submitted. One will need to be submitted and reviewed by staff and the City’s
Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments.
•Floodplain
The submitted concept plan does not impact floodplain.
•Drainage and Utility Easements
All needed drainage and utility easements have been provided with the approved
preliminary plat.
•Development Agreement
A development agreement will be required with the final plat.
•Grading Agreement
Ms. Katie Larsen
11/06/2024
Page 3
Lyngblomsten Nursing Home – Skilled Nursing Addition - Engineering Review
Grading agreement not required at this time.
•Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater maintenance for public facilities are already in place with the main building.
•Permits Required
Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential
permits may include some of the following and others:
1.NPDES General Construction Permit
2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction
If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris
Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.