The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/11/2024 PZ Combined Packet Meeting guidelines on reverse side. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, December 11, 2024 Broadcast on Cable TV Channel 16 and northmetrotv.com/lino-lakes-stream ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 6:30 P.M. Council Chambers (televised) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Public Comment (sign-in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum) 4. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 5. Approval of Minutes: November 13, 2024 6. Action Items A. Slater Addition Final Plat B. Spargur Estates Final Plat C. Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan 7. Discussion Items A. Cannabis Ordinance B. Project Updates ADJOURNMENT DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on November 13, 2024. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Root declared public comment open at 6:32 p.m. Sam Bennett, 6841 Lakeview Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, Mr. Bennett thinks the City is lacking identity and is moving in the wrong direction. He would like to see Lino Lakes be known for more than just the prison. He thinks there are things we can do to showcase our City by using the features we have here. He feels there is no cornerstone development and believes we are missing the potential for the City. He thinks having all of the drive through’s is going to be detrimental to the City and thinks we should make the City more of a destination rather than a place to drive through. He expressed he is a small business owner and would not invest in Lino Lakes. He wants to see foot traffic and pride with people engaging in the community and thinks the national chains coming into the City squash that. He thinks we should put more focus on Lino Lakes becoming a destination where people spend their time and money. To create something that we invest in to make it more genuine. He believes by allowing the national chains into the City, we are stepping away from that direction. He questioned if that is the kind of growth we want to have. DATE: November 13, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 7:24 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech, Neil Evenson Michael Root, Suzy Guthmueller, Perry Laden, Patrick Kohler MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee Julie Whitney Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2024 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Evenson moved to close public comment. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Public comment was closed at 6:37 p.m. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr.Kohler moved to approve the October 9, 2024 meeting minutes with two corrections. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Mr. Evenson and Mr. Vojtech abstained. Motion carried 5 – 0. 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Public Hearing Continued: Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat and Variance Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. On September 9, 2024, the applicant, Mespargur Inc, submitted a complete land use application for variances and preliminary plat for Spargur Estates. The applicant proposed to subdivide the existing parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into four (4) single family lots for the purpose of constructing three (3) new single family detached dwellings. The preliminary plat did not meet density requirements. On October 9, 2024, the Planning & Zoning Board opened and motioned to continue the public hearing to allow the applicant time to revise the plans. Staff questioned the lot sizes and Mr. Laden expressed disappointment that they could not separate the lot into 4 lots that is consistent with the rest of the neighborhood. He thinks it should be addressed in future comp plans. He said when the density requirements were changed, they did not consider what it would do to existing neighborhoods that can be further subdivided. He would like to look at this in the future so this lot can be further subdivided. The applicant, Mr. Spargur was acknowledged to be in attendance and had nothing further to add to the discussion. Mr. Root continued the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. No public comments were made. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2024 Page 3 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Wipperfurth moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. The public hearing was closed at 6:46 p.m. Mr. Root agreed with Mr. Laden and reiterated they were bound by the comp plan but said it does get revised at times and it is something they will consider during the revision. Mr. Laden moved to approve the preliminary plat and variance subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Whipperfurth. Motion carried 7-0. B. Public Hearing: Colonial Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ms. Kendra Lindahl, Planning Consultant with Landform, presented the staff report. The City of Lino Lakes has initiated a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for land located east of Hodgson Road, north of 62nd Street North and south of Birch Street. The area is an existing residential neighborhood with 29 homes known as Colonial Woods. Many of the property owners petitioned for the extension of sewer service, which requires a comprehensive plan amendment, as part of the City’s proposed street reconstruction project. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes a Full Build Land Use Plan and a 2040 Land Use plan. The Full Build plan guides the area as low density residential, and the 2040 Future Land Use plan shows the area as Urban Reserve. To provide sanitary sewer, the 2040 Land Use plan will need to be amended to match the Full Build Land Use Plan. The 2040 Utility Staging Plan also needs to be amended to change from Stage 3 Planned Service Area to Stage 1A Planned Service Area. Mr. Evenson requested more information on the Metropolitan Council’s formula for calculating compliance with regional density. Ms. Lindahl explained the Met Council, when completing the comprehensive plan, regulates regional sewer systems and ensure they are cost effective by using land density. Met Council then establishes a minimum density that is intended to ensure efficient use of the sanitary sewer system. There is a three acre per unit minimum that needs to be met on average across the community during development. The formula changes every ten years and some parcels are exempt. She said it requires them to submit to the Met Council even though they do not have the approval authority. They do have the authority however, to ensure it is compliant with the regional system policies. Mr. Root opened the public hearing at 6:54 p.m. No public comments were made. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2024 Page 4 DRAFT MINUTES Mr. Vojtech moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. The public hearing was closed at 6:55 p.m. Mr. Laden inquired what the cost was per property for sewer and water connection. Ms. Hankee said the initial capital cost is $18,000 per residence. They do not have to connect initially, but it they choose to connect there are additional connection fees. Ms. Hankee said the average connection fee is $7,500 per property. Met Council has a $2,500 fee due to our sewer system flowing into theirs, so that is $10,000 total. There is also an additional connection fee of approximately $7,500 for the neighborhood connection. These costs can be assessed to the property for 15 years at 5%. Mr. Vojtech asked if anyone was against the extension. Ms. Hankee said there were two that had new systems who were not in favor. She said there is a petition process, but they did not receive a valid 51% against the project. Mr. Vojtech asked if a residence is put on City water and sewer on a one-acre lot, would they be able to subdivide from 1.7 to 3 per acre. Mr. Grochala said they could but the City is not providing additional services for future subdivisions. Mr. Evenson asked if residents were notified. Mr. Grochala said there was a feasibility study completed and a public hearing that was held. He also added in this case there were two open houses. He said when the assessment is adopted, the residents will receive another round of notifications. Mr. Wipperfurth asked when bringing the utilities in, if there are additional fees from the right of way to the residence. Ms. Hankee confirmed that it would be an additional cost but added it would be around the same amount if they needed a new system. Ms. Guthmueller asked if a resident’s system is not failing, could they still hook up to City water and sewer. Mr. Grochala stated they could. He said typically before extending into an area that is lower than our typical sewer density, council usually wants to demonstrate there is a reason for doing that. Some either have a failing system or non- compliant and do not meet the groundwater separation so those requirements are generally satisfied for the area. Mr. Vojtech moved to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 7-0. C. Lyngblomsten PUD Concept Plan #2 - Skilled Nursing Home Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2024 Page 5 DRAFT MINUTES The applicant, Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for PUD Amendment #2 to the PUD Preliminary Plan and Final Plan. They are requesting the proposed fence along the north lot line not be required. They are also requesting a pickleball court be constructed in the southwest corner of the development. Part of the amendment would be to change the skilled nursing wing from a 2 story building to a 3 story building. They would also be adding additional parking on site. Mr. Laden asked if there was a story requirement for the commercial part of the development. Ms. Larsen said they would have put a maximum height but does not know what that was. Mr. Laden requested looking into the minimum height requirement. He also requested Council request relocation of the pickle ball court with this proposal. Mr. Evenson is in favor of the building. Judd Fenlon, 90 Dale St S, St Paul, MN 55102, is a real estate advisor who works with Lyngblomsten. Mr. Fenlon said the skilled nursing unit is an important component to the facility. He discussed the decision to reconfigure the size and location of the building to accommodate the needs of the residents and their visiting families. Mr. Fenlon said in addition to the additional parking lot outside, there would be a parking garage under the building. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Ms. Larsen provided project updates. Mr. Laden moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Wipperfurth. Meeting adjourned at 7:24 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Julie Whitney – Community Development Administrative Assistant CITY OF LINO LAKES ADVISORY BOARD MEETING GUIDELINES Advisory boards are fact-finding bodies established to aid the City Council in specific areas. The decisions of any board are considered advisory only and all final decisions rest with the City Council. Board meetings shall operate in accordance with the procedures established by the City Council. The following meeting guidelines are derived from the City Council Rules of Decorum. Members of the Audience – No person in the audience shall engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct such as audible commentary during a meeting, hand clapping, stamping of feet, whistling, using profane language, yelling and similar demonstrations, which conduct disturbs the peace and good order of the meeting. Public Comment– Comments from the public will be accepted on any matter, whether on the agenda or not. Comments will not be accepted during specific agenda items unless a Public Hearing has been noticed. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the following guidelines: • Sign-in prior to the start of the meeting • Step up to the microphone when recognized by the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice- Chair) • State your name and address for the record • State the subject to be discussed • Limit comments to 4 minutes • Address comments to the board as a whole, not any specific member • No question may be asked of a board member or staff member without the permission of the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) • Elect a spokesperson for a group of persons who wish to address the board on the same subject Public Hearing – A public hearing is a separate item of business on the agenda. It gives the public an opportunity to comment on the topic identified. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the guidelines outlined for public comment (although no sign-in required). Typically, a public hearing proceeds as follows: 1. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the agenda item and staff will present their report. 2. Board members have the opportunity to ask staff questions about the item. 3. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) opens the public hearing and will recognize those who want to speak. 4. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall close the public hearing. 5. The Board will then discuss the item. No further public comments are allowed. 6. The Board will make a recommendation and/or decision. After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall address the board from the audience on the matter under consideration. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: December 11, 2024 REQUEST: Slater Addition Final Plat CASE NUMBER: FP2024-006 APPLICANT: Boulder Contracting Attn: Brian Jansen 16522 Wake Street NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: November 13, 2024 60-Day Deadline: January 12, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: January 13, 2025 City Council Meeting: January 13, 2025 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Boulder Contracting, submitted a land use application for final plat for Slater Addition. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 7869 Meadow View Trail into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family homes. The lot is 1.41 gross acres (61,294 sf). The Land Use Application is: • Final Plat o 3 lots This staff report is based on the following information: 2 • Slater Addition plan set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated July 31, 2024 November 8, 2024 • Slater Addition final plat dated October 23, 2024 • Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance dated October 11, 2024 Previous Council Actions: • October 14, 2024: Resolution No. 24-134 approving Preliminary Plat This staff report provides updates to the October 14, 2024 Council staff report related to the preliminary plat. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). BACKGROUND Existing Site Conditions The 1.41 acre lot is legally described as Lot 1, Block 4, Mar Don Acres. It contains an existing house, attached garage, deck, and fence. The house was built in 1982. The Certificate of Survey indicates Zimmerman Fine Sand and Soderville Fine Sand. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 5 to 7.5 feet. Zoning Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential 2040 Comp Plan Land Use Low Density Sewered Residential Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North R-1, Single Family Residential Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve East R-1, Single Family Residential Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R, Rural Rural Residential Low Density Sewered Residential 3 ANALYSIS Density The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 1.41 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) 0.00 Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 1.41 # of Units 3 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.13 Net Density (units/acre) 2.13 Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.13 units per acre is consistent with density requirements. Zoning Requirements The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Lot 3 will contain the existing single family house. Lots 1 and 2 are being created for the purpose of constructing two (2) single family homes. R-1 Requirements Lot 1 (Proposed House) Lot 2 (Proposed House) Lot 3 (Existing House) Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 17,200 sf 17,200 sf 26,895 sf 4 Min. Lot Width --Corner Lot 100 ft NA NA 125 ft --Interior Lot 80 ft 80 ft 80 ft NA Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 215 ft 215 ft 215 ft Building Setback (ft) -From Street 30 ft 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft (Lois & Meadow View) -Rear Yard --Principal 30 ft 115 ft 115 ft 16.3 fta -Accessory 5 ft Future Future 16.3 fta -Side Yard --Principal 10 ft 10-15 ft 10 ft 60 ft --Accessory 5 ft 10 ft 10.6 ft 40 ft Impervious Surface 65% TBD w/ building permit TBD w/ building permit 9.4% aThe existing house will become legal non-conforming. The proposed lots meet zoning requirements. Lot Frontage and Front Lot Line The current lot frontage and front lot line for the existing lot is along Meadow View Trail. The preliminary plat creates a 125ft lot width along Lois Lane for Lot 3 (existing house). The lot frontage and front lot line for Lot 3 (existing house) is now along Lois Lane. The rear lot line is opposite the front lot line which is the south lot line. The existing house is 16.3ft from the rear lot line making it legal non-conforming. The house address, driveway access, etc. does not change and will remain on Meadow View Trail. Per Zoning Ordinance Section 1007.001 Rules and Definitions: LOT FRONTAGE. The narrowest lot boundary abutting a public street or street easement that meets minimum lot width requirements. If none of the boundaries abutting a public street or street easement meet minimum lot width requirements, then the lot frontage is the widest boundary abutting a street. LOT LINE, FRONT. The lot line separating a lot from the street right-of-way along the lot frontage. 5 LOT LINE, REAR. The lot line opposite and most distant from the lot frontage which connects the side lot lines. For the purposes of this chapter, the rear lot line of a triangular lot shall be a line entirely within the lot at least ten feet long and parallel to and most distance point from the front lot line. If the front lot line on such a lot is curved, the rear lot line shall be parallel to a line tangent to the front lot line. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family houses proposed on Lots 1 and 2 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards. Subdivision Ordinance The legal description of the existing lot is Lot 1, Block 4, Mar Don Acres and was platted in 1978. Similar residential subdivisions of Mar Don Acres lots have been approved in previous years (Cavegn Estates-2006, Hailey Manor-2007, Isabell Estates-2014, Golden Acre-2017, Butler Addition-2021). Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat and final plat are consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential development and zoning code requirements for R-1, Single Family Residential as discussed above. Blocks and Lots The final plat contains Lots 1-3, Block 1, Slater Addition. As noted above, Lot 3 contains the existing house and Lots 1 and 2 propose new single family homes. Streets and Alleys Lots 1 and 2 are served by Lois Lane which is a minor collector road. The existing road right-of- way width is 60 ft which is consistent with previously approved plats in the area. No additional road right-of-way is needed. Lot 3 is served by Meadow View Trail which is a local road. The existing road right-of-way width is 60 ft. No additional road right-of-way is needed. In 2021, the City vacated the cul de sac road right-of-way and related drainage and utility easement that existed on the west end of the lot. The recorded document number is 2320299.001. 6 Easements The Mar Don Acres final plat has existing drainage and utility easements dedicated per the plat. These easements will remain in place. Standard drainage and utility easements at least ten (10) feet wide have been provided along all other lot lines within the proposed Slater Addition. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The proposed development does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. Public Utilities A 2” pressurized sanitary sewer main exists along this section of Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house on Lot 3 is connected to municipal sanitary sewer. The new houses shall connect to municipal sanitary sewer. An 8” watermain exists along Lois Lane and laterals are stubbed to the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The existing house on Lot 3 is connected to the municipal watermain. A private well exists near the driveway and may continue to be used for irrigation or it shall be abandoned. The new houses shall connect to the municipal watermain. Public Land Dedication The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area. The development is not within the greenway system. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 3 with the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 2 x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300 = Total Due $6,600 Screening, Landscaping, Buffer Yards and Tree Preservation Per the August 28, 2024 Environmental Board staff report: Canopy Cover 7 Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply. Boulevard Trees Standards Boulevard trees are required for all new residential subdivisions at a rate of one tree per lot frontage. A 26” caliper oak tree is being preserved in the front yard of Lot 1. No additional boulevard tree is proposed for this lot or recommended. A boulevard tree is shown on the landscape plan for lot 2. This tree should be has been relocated to the right-of-way. The existing house (lot 3) has a tree in the right-of-way area and will not require an additional boulevard tree. Boulevard tree requirements are met provided the boulevard tree is relocated to the right-of- way. Sod and Ground Cover All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards A tree survey was performed that identified: 8 Of the 67 total trees in the inventory, 30 trees will be removed, 37 will be preserved. The 37 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. 29 of the tree removals are in the Basic Use Area (BUA) and do not require mitigation. One tree planned for removal is in a non-BUA and non-ESA (14” maple on Lot 2). This tree will require mitigation at a one to one ratio. Overall, for the 30 removals, 1 mitigation trees will be required. This tree must be has been added to the Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards are met with the addition of 1 mitigation tree. EQB Environmental Review An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Wetlands There are no wetlands on site. FEMA Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district. Impervious Surface Coverage The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 3 (existing house) is at 9.4% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lot 1 and 2 will be evaluated with those individual building permits and surveys. Traffic Study Total Trees 67 Total Trees Removed 30 Total Trees Preserved 37 Mitigation Trees Required 2 1 9 A traffic study was not required for two (2) new single family lots on the Lois Lane. The street is a minor collector and has capacity for two (2) additional single family homes. Title Commitment The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment and final plat and noted mortgage consent is required. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010. Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall has submitted a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Slater Addition is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the parcel is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed three (3) single family and net density of 2.13 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. Housing Plan A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Slater Addition meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing. 10 Economic Development The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the City’s economic development plan. Transportation Plan A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Lois Lane is a minor collector road and has capacity to accommodate two (2) new single family homes. Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems. Slater Addition does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan calls for silt fence and a rock construction exit. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The existing house is connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. The two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 2” pressurized system. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for two (2) additional single family houses. Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The existing house is connected to the municipal water supply system. The two (2) new houses will be municipally served by 8” watermain. The existing water supply system has capacity for two (2) additional single family houses. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. 11 FINDINGS OF FACT-FINAL PLAT Per Section 1001.057 Review, Approval or Denial: (1) The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: (a) The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan; The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. (b) For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and This is a three (3) lot single family residential subdivision and will be platted in one (1) phase. (c) Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Slater Addition final plat with the following conditions: 1. The new houses on proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Slater Addition shall connect to municipal watermain and municipal sanitary sewer main. The following items shall be addressed prior to release of the final plat mylars: 1. Comments from City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024. 2. Comments from Environmental Memo dated November 14, 2024. 3. The existing pavers shall be removed. 4. The existing fence proposed Lot 2, Block 1, Slater Addition shall be removed. The following items shall be addressed prior to issuing building permits for Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1, Slater Addition: 12 1.Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan, notes the existing septic and existing well to be removed per local and state regulations. a.The developer shall submit to the City the MPCA SSTA Abandonment Reporting Form as proof that the private septic system has been properly removed. b.The developer shall submit to the City the MDH Well and Boring Sealing Record as proof that the private well has been properly capped. ATTACHMENTS 1.Slater Addition Preliminary Plat 2.Slater Addition Final Plat 3.City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024 4.Environmental Memo dated November 14, 2024 Attachment 1: Slater Addition Preliminary Plat Attachment 2: Slater Addition Final Plat 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: December 4, 2024 Re: Slater Addition Final Plat & Civil Plan Review 026378-000 As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Final Plat and Civil Plans for the Slater Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received April 12, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Slater Addition – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated November 8, 2024. •Slater Addition – Certificate of Survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, dated November 8, 2024. •Slater Addition – Site Drainage and Narrative Calculations prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated November 5, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. Plowe (11/7/2024) Responses in red. WSB (12/4/2024) responses and new comments in blue. Engineering •Grading The Slater Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to create three (3)single-family lots. There are urban sections along both Lois Lane and Meadowview Trail. An existing drainage swale generally flows counterclockwise around the lots at minimal grade discharging to the northwest. Comments: 1.Provide existing contours and/or spot elevations on and adjacent to the west property line to show match elevations and directions of flow (Plowe 11/7/24) Additional topo has been collected and added to the plan set. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete Attachment 3: City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024 Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04//2024 Page 2 Slater Addition Engineering Review 2.Currently there is a large low area on the northern half of Lot 3 that receives a large area of drainage from these and adjacent lots but does not drain out •Show the 907.6 HWL limits of this area (Plowe 11/7/24) The 907.6 contour has been added. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 3.Provide high points for where the drainage breaks in the back adjacent to Lot 2. (Plowe 11/7/24) A high point has been added showing the grade break. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 4.Provide drainage and utility easements for surface drainage from one lot to another. Plowe 11/7/24) Additional easement has been granted. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 5.Call out the rear berm. Plowe 11/7/24) Note added as requested (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 6.Hold down grades at the front house corners of Lots 1 and 2 as necessary to maintain maximum 3:1 slopes. •Increase frost depths as necessary Plowe 11/7/24) A note has been added indicating the extra depth footings with exposed foundation may be necessary for future building construction. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 7.Provide spot elevations of rear swale from south including all property lines •Show proposed slopes Plowe 11/7/24) The slope of the swale has been added to the plan (1.2%). (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Try to increase rear swale by adjusting proposed 908 contour line (Plowe 11/7/24) Per 7(b) above, the swale has been adjusted as requested to provide better slope. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Stormwater Management Stormwater management is not required under City ordinance. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04//2024 Page 3 Slater Addition Engineering Review •Water Supply The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services extended to the lots from Lois Lane. Comments: 1.City records show that the utilities to the existing house (Lot 3) are already connected to the City system •Show existing water service alignment (Plowe 11/7/24) The applicant and property owner have confirmed that the house is connected to city water. The property owner only knew that they are connected on the north side of the house. An estimated route for the services is shown on the plans. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Otherwise, show connecting the existing house (Lot 3) to the provided water service stub with construction (Plowe 11/7/24) See above. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 3 per MDH requirements with construction i.Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation use if MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services (Plowe 11/7/24) A note has been added to verify that the well is to be sealed if not done so already. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 2.Keep utility services for Lot 3 out of the low area HWL (Plowe 11/7/24) Per above 1(a) above, it is unclear where the existing services are located. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by three 1¼” diameter Schedule 40 PVC low pressure service pipes extended to the lots from Lois Lane. All lots will require E-One or approved equal grinder pump stations to connect to the City system. Comments: 1.City records show that the utilities to the existing house (Lot 3) are already connected to the City system •Verify whether a low pressure grinder station is currently connected to the City system as shown on the existing conditions plan sheet (Plowe 11/7/24) The applicant and property owner have confirmed that the house is connected to city sewer. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04//2024 Page 4 Slater Addition Engineering Review (WSB 12/4/24) Complete i.Show sanitary sewer alignment (Plowe 11/7/24) Similar to the existing water service, it is unclear where the existing services are located. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete ii.Clarify how the existing sanitary sewer manhole to be removed is incorporated into the current system (Plowe 11/7/24) - A note has been added indicating that if the existing septic system is in place, it must be removed per local and state requirements. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Show septic system for existing house (Lot 3) if present i.Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with construction and show connecting to the provided sanitary sewer stubs with construction (Plowe 11/7/24) Per above, this house is already connected to city sewer and the septic system has been removed. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 1.Sanitary sewer service stub is 1 1/4" PVC SCH 40 (Plowe 11/7/24) Applicant noted (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 2.Show installation of E-One or equivalent grinder pump station (Plowe 11/7/24) N/A (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 3.Keep utility services for Lot 3 out of the low area HWL (Plowe 11/7/24) Per 1(a)above, it is unclear where the existing services are located. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Transportation There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing single-family lot into three smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly more traffic. •Trails and sidewalks Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04//2024 Page 5 Slater Addition Engineering Review There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with none being proposed •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no wetlands identified on the site •Landscaping The Slater Addition Site Landscape Plan will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. •Floodplain The Slater Addition does not impact floodplain. •Drainage and Utility Easements The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single- family corner lot (10’ front (Meadow View Trail) and back; 10’ north side (Lois Lane), 5’ south side). Additional easements have been added around the perimeter of the smaller lots resulting in; •The proposed Lot 1 will have 10’ in the front (north), 10’ on the west side, 5’ on the east side, and 5’ easement in the back (south). •The proposed Lot 2 will have 10’ in the front (north), 5’ on the sides, and 5’ easement in the back (south). •The proposed Lot 3 will have 10’ in the front (east), 10’ on the north side, 5’ on the south side, and 5’ easement in the back (west). Comments: 1. Provide additional drainage and utility easement that completely contains the 907.6 HWL of the low area in the northern portion of Lot 3. (Plowe 11/7/24) Additional easement has been granted to cover the HWL of the low area. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement No grading agreement is required for this site. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04//2024 Page 6 Slater Addition Engineering Review No stormwater maintenance declaration agreement is required for this site. •Permits Required 1.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction (Plowe 11/7/24) Applicant noted (WSB 12/4/24) Complete 2.NPDES General Construction Permit (Plowe 11/7/24) Because the disturbed area is less than one (1) acre, an NPDES permit should not be required. (WSB 12/4/24) Complete If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: November 14, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments – Slater Addition Environmental Board had recommended the following at their August 28, 2024 meeting: 1.Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) for the 37 trees scheduled for preservation must be shown to scale on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1), Removals Plan (Sheet C1.2), and the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of sediment and erosion control measures. 2.Replace note on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan about installing tree protection with “Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail”. 3.The Landscape Plan (Sheet L1) should include a note that “Existing Trees shall be protected in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail. City Tree Protection Fence Detail should be added to Sheet C3.1. 4.The tree planting detail shall include comments about exposing root flare so it is visibly at grade to ensure trees are installed at proper depth, and that mulch is pulled back 3 inches from the trunk (mulch is not left touching the trunk). 5.2 mitigation trees are required. These trees must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). At least one tree shall be included on Lot 2, Block 1. 6.The boulevard tree shown for Lot 1 must be moved north into the right-of-way. 7.Ground cover types must be added to the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). This includes cover type for all exposed soil areas (ex: sod for the lots) Environmental Memo Attachment 4: Environmental Memo dated November 14, 2024 Page 2 8.Rock construction entrance only shown for one of the homes. Rock entrance should be shown on both lots. Include entrance on lot 1 and add symbol to legend. 9.Add note on C1.1 to sweep adjacent impervious surfaces as directed by city engineer. 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: December 11, 2024 REQUEST: Spargur Estates Final Plat CASE NUMBER: FP2024-007 APPLICANT: Mespargur Inc. Attn: Mitch Spargur 12952 96th St NE Otsego, MN 55330 OWNER: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: November 15, 2024 60-Day Deadline:January 14, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: January 13, 2025 City Council Meeting: January 13, 2025 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Mespargur Inc., submitted a land use application for final plat for Spargur Estates. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family homes. The lot is 1.11 gross acres (48,510 sf). The Land Use Application is: •Final Plat o 3 lots This staff report is based on the following information: 2 • Spargur Estates Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 November 14, 2024 • Drainage Report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 November 14, 2024 • Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company dated August 23, 2024 • Spargur Estates Final Plat Previous Council Actions: • December 9, 2024: Resolution No. 24-156 approving Variances • December 9, 2024: Resolution No. 24-157 approving Preliminary Plat This staff report provides updates to the December 9, 2024 Council staff report related to the preliminary plat. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). BACKGROUND Existing Site Conditions The 1.11 acre lot is legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mar Don Acres. It contains a single family detached dwelling and attached garage. The house was built in 1982. Other than trees and shrubs, there are no significant natural resources on site. The Certificate of Survey indicates a Soderville fine sand and Zimmerman fine sand on the property. Zoning Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential Future Land Use per CP Low Density Sewered Residential (1.6 to 3.0 units per acre) Utility Staging Area 1A = 2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential 3 East R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential ANALYSIS Density The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 1.11 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other 0.00 Net Area (acres) 1.11 # of Units 3 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.70 Net Density (units/acre) 2.70 Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with density requirements. Zoning Requirements Zoning requirements and standards of the R-1 Single Family Residential District apply to this subdivision. R-1 Requirements Proposed Lot 1 (existing house) Lot 2 Lot 3 4 Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 21,780 sf 10,890 sf 10,890 sf Min. Lot Width 80 ft 165 ft 82.50 ft 82.50 ft Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 132a ft 132a ft 132a ft Building Setback -From Streets Lois Ln and Arlo Ln (Both Minor Collector) 30 ft 38.9 ft 30 ft 30 ft -Rear --Principal 30 ft 49.3 ft 30 ft 30 ft --Accessory 5 ft 23 ft 5 ft 5 ft -Side --Principal 10 ft 90 ft 10 ft 10 ft --Accessory 5 ft 7.3 ft 5 ft 5 ft Impervious Surface 65% 17.6% TBD w/ building permit TBD w/ building permit aVariances for the lot depths were approved with Resolution No. 24-156. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family detached dwellings proposed on Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards. Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat and final plat are consistent with the comprehensive plan for low density residential development and zoning code requirements for R-1, Single Family Residential. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat creates 1 block with 3 lots. Lot 1, Block 1 will contain the existing house which will remain on site. Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be developed with single family detached dwellings. 5 Streets and Alleys Arlo Lane is a minor collector road and is capable of handling two (2) additional single family detached dwellings. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements are being dedicated along the lot lines. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The proposed development does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. Per the Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations report revision date November 14, 2024, a small rear yard depression is shown to help get drainage from west to east. This basin overflows to the east to match existing conditions. It is assumed the basin will drain dry between storm events. Public Utilities The existing house at 559 Lois Lane is connected to public watermain and sanitary sewer. The two (2) new lots will also be connected to public water and sanitary which is capable of handling two (2) single family detached dwellings. Water and sanitary sewer laterals are already stubbed into the two (2) proposed lots. Public Land Dedication The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area. The development is not within the greenway system. Arlo Lane is identified as a future trail corridor that is proposed to extend from Highland Meadows Park to Woodduck Trail and eventually to 4th Avenue. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 1 with the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 2 x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300 = Total Due $6,600 Screening, Landscaping, Buffer Yards and Tree Preservation 6 Per the September 25, 2024 Environmental Board staff report: Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply. Boulevard Trees Standards Boulevard trees are required for all new residential subdivisions at a rate of one tree per lot frontage. Lots 1 and 2 have existing trees that will remain in place. The landscape plan shows one boulevard tree proposed for both Lot 3 and lot 4. Boulevard tree requirements is being met. Sod and Ground Cover All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The ground cover types and locations must be have been added to the Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and the Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards A tree survey was performed that identified: 7 19 trees were identified in the tree inventory, with 2 proposed for removal. Seven (7) or the remaining 17 are located off site along the western property line of lot 3. The 17 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. The Tree Protection Zones need to be are shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met. EQB Environmental Review An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Wetlands There are no wetlands on site. FEMA Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district. Impervious Surface Coverage The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 1 (existing house) is at 17.6% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lots 2 and 3 will be evaluated with those individual building permits and surveys. Traffic Study A traffic study is not required for two (2) new single family lots on Arlo Lane. It is a minor collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached dwellings. Title Commitment Total Trees 19 Total Trees Removed 2 Total Trees Preserved 17 Mitigation Trees Required 0 8 The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment and final plat. The title commitment needs to match the signer of the plat and the mortgage needs to be released. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010. Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall has submitted a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Spargur Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding land use, density, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. Housing Plan A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Spargur Estates meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing. Economic Development The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the City’s economic development plan. 9 Transportation Plan A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Arlo Lane is a minor collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached dwellings. Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems. Spargur Estates protects the natural surface and groundwater storage with the construction of a small rear yard depression. Erosion and sediment control practices will also be implemented. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The existing house is served by an 8” municipal sanitary sewer main along Lois Lane. The two (2) new lots will be served by 8” municipal sanitary sewer along Arlo Lane. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached dwellings. Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The existing house is served by an 8” municipal watermain along Lois Lane. The two (2) new lots will be served by 8” municipal watermain along Arlo Lane. The existing water supply system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached dwellings. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. FINDINGS OF FACT-FINAL PLAT 10 Per Section 1001.057 Review, Approval or Denial: (1) The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider the final plat and the Community Development Department shall forward the Planning and Zoning Board recommendations to the City Council. The following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board: (a) The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan; The final plat substantially conforms with the preliminary plat. (b) For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for 40% of lots in the preceding phase. This division applies only when the preceding phase consists of 40 or more lots; and This is a three (3) lot single family residential subdivision and will be platted in one (1) phase. (c) Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be substantially fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. The conditions of the preliminary plat have been substantially fulfilled. Securities will be required with a Development Agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Spargur Estates final plat with the following conditions: 1. Comments from City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024 shall be addressed. The following items shall be addressed prior to November 30, 2025 or at time of building permit issuance: 1. As shown on Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan: a. The existing fence and pavers shall be removed. b. The old gravel area now overgrown with grass adjacent to the existing driveway off Lois Lane, the random dirt piles, and the gravel driveway off Arlo Lane shall be restored with proper ground cover in compliance with City Code Section 1007.049(8). ATTACHMENTS 1. Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat 11 2. Spargur Estates Final Plat 3. City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024 Attachment 1: Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat Attachment 2: Spargur Estates Final Plat 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: December 4, 2024 Re: Spargur Estates Final Plat & Civil Plan Review 026728-000 As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans for Spargur Estates Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received November 15, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Spargur Estates – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated November 15, 2024. •Spargur Estates – Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations prepared by Plowe Engineering, revised November 14, 2024. •Spargur Estates – Final Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated November 15, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. Plowe (10/15/2024) Responses in red. WSB (11/6/2024) responses and new comments in blue. Plowe (11/15/2024) Responses in orange. WSB (12/4/2024) responses and new comments in green. Engineering •Grading The Spargur Estates Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to create three (3) single-family lots and a narrow infiltration basin. The infiltration basin treats the rear and some front drainage from the four lots while the remaining drainage flows to Arlo Lane to the north or Lois Lane to the south. Comments: 1.Maintain 2% positive slope through Arlo Lane boulevard/right of way (Plowe 10/15//24) The grading plan has been revised to show a positive slope (2%) to the curb line through the Arlo Ln R/W and most of the lot frontages (WSB 11/6/24) Complete Attachment 3: City Engineer Memo dated December 4, 2024 Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 2 Spargur Estates Engineering Review 2.There is an existing low area at the northeast rear corner of Lot 1 near the fire pit •Consider filling low area to reduce standing water in a rain event (Plowe 10/15//24) It appears that with some revised grading, there is a positive slope to the east. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 3. Provide information or a detail for any special construction or soil information for 2’ drainage ditches (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is to be removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend. (WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment (Plowe 11/15/24) Extents of soil amendment area now shown on the grading plan (WSB 12/4/24) Verify that removals are down to existing permeable soils •Ditches will need to demonstrate permeable material (Plowe 10/15//24) A boring in the ditch location shows SP-SM soils which are generally silty sands. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Recommend digging down to permeable soils and installing sand/compost mix to final grade to better promote infiltration and reduce standing water in a rain event (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is to be removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend. (WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment (Plowe 11/15/24) Extents of soil amendment area now shown on the grading plan (WSB 12/4/24) Verify that removals are down to existing permeable soils 4.Provide ditch High Water Level (HWL) on plans (Plowe 10/15//24) The basin’s HWL has been noted on the plans. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 5.Relocate existing shed outside of 5' easement/setback (Plowe 10/15//24) It is noted that the shed (a portable smokehouse) will be moved outside of the drainage and utility easement and 5-ft setback. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 6.Relocate existing fire pit outside of 20' distance from property line and 25' distance from structures (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the fire pit should be moved to meet the above required distances. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 3 Spargur Estates Engineering Review 7. The current 906.8 'berm' near the southeast corner of Lot 4 would spill over the 906.5 spot elevation on the eastern property line • Raise berm and initial EOF to east to 907.2 (Basin to the east is 'land- locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west) (Plowe 10/15//24) Berm has been raised as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete • EOF for basin to the east is towards this development and would be at 907.2 (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted (WSB 11/6/24) Complete • The highpoint on the east side at the front of Lot 4 would become the secondary EOF for the existing basin to the east when inundated. (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted (WSB 11/6/24) Previous 908.7 EOF acted as a secondary EOF for the adjacent developments to the east and west and must be maintained (Basin to the east is 'land-locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west). 1 Areas along the side property line can be filled to improve drainage swales but the 908.7 EOF must be maintained (Plowe 11/15/24) Extents A second basin has been added at this location to help drainage get to the east and still maintain the critical 908.7 EOF along near the NE corner of Spargur Estates. (WSB 12/4/24) Create minimal drainage swale instead of basin draining from the 908.7 EOF to the 906.5 southeast corner. 2 Adjacent grading should be contained to drainage and utility easements (Plowe 11/15/24) Noted. No work anticipated to west as it appears that this EOF is already 908.7 or lower. (WSB 12/4/24) When creating a minimal swale from the EOF to the southeast corner there will be minimal fill on the adjacent property that should be contained within the existing 5’ drainage and utility easement 3 Grading on adjacent property must be coordinated and approved by the adjacent property owner (Plowe 11/15/24) Grading on east side of Spargur Estates has been adjusted so that no work on adjacent property is required. (WSB 12/4/24) Applicant to coordinate with adjacent property owner and City for grading within the drainage and utility easement Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 4 Spargur Estates Engineering Review 4 Provide written documentation to the City prior to construction (Plowe 11/15/24) See #3 above (WSB 12/4/24) - Complete •(WSB 11/6/24) The Lowest Opening Elevation (LOE) of Lots 2 and 3 must be at least 910.7 to maintain minimum freeboard with the EOF (908.7) 1 The Lowest Floor elevation must be a minimum 909.4 (SELO) (Plowe 11/15/24) See #3 above Low floors are 2-feet above the two basins’ HWLs; low openings are 1-foot above the EOF (908.7). (WSB 12/4/24) Low openings (currently 909.7) need to be 2’ above the EOF (908.7) •Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the site consists of a small read yard depression. However, based on site layout, stormwater management is not required under City ordinance. Comments on the proposed stormwater design are offered below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 0.66 1.80 4.92 Not required Proposed 0.59 1.85 4.81 Not required Comments: 1.There are minor increases in site runoff rates due to the new impervious. However, as stormwater management requirements are not triggered, these increases are not regulated. Runoff to the north and south will be captured by storm sewer routing to City ponds. (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.Sufficient freeboard is available between the depression modeled HWL and the proposed household low floors/low entries. (Plowe 10/15//24) Per client request, the units shown are now split-entry walkouts; these low floors had to be raised to meet the 2-ft freeboard requirement. (WSB 11/6/24) The revised lowest openings for Lots 2 and 3 no longer meet minimum freeboard requirements with the adjacent EOFs (909.5+). It is necessary to maintain (Plowe 11/15/24) Lowest openings have been raised to be 1-ft above the ultimate EOF of 908.7. (WSB 12/4/24) Low openings (909.7) need to be 2’ above the EOF (908.7) Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 5 Spargur Estates Engineering Review 3.Silt fence or bioroll is recommended around the rear yard depression to maintain infiltration capacity and reduce likelihood of excess ponding in the future. (Plowe 10/15//24) Biorolls have been added as suggested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Water Supply The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services extended to the lots. Comments: 1.Show the existing well for Lot 1 if present •Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 1 per MDH requirements with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) The existing well was sealed multiple years ago. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation use if MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services (Plowe 10/15//24) N/A (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewer and water service stubs with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate locations have been shown. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Water service stub is 1" copper (Type K) •Show existing water service from main to house if present 3.Show existing water stubs to all lots as 1" copper (Type K) (Plowe 10/15//24) Water services have been labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by existing 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC gravity service pipes extended to the lots from Arlo Lane (Lots 2 and 3). The existing lot (Lot 1) has been previously connected to a service in Lois Lane. Comments: 1.Show septic system for existing house (Lot 1) if present •Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) The septic system was removed multiple years ago. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 6 Spargur Estates Engineering Review 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewer and water service stubs with construction •Sanitary sewer service stub is 4" PVC SCH 40 (Plowe 10/15//24) Labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Show existing sanitary sewer service from main to house if present (Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate location has been shown. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 3.Show existing sanitary sewer stubs to all lots as 4” PVC Schedule 40 (Plowe 10/15//24) Sewer services have been labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 4.Provide low floor information for all lots on utility plan (Plowe 10/15//24) Low floor information has been added to the plan. Note that the existing house low floor was estimated based on known first floor elevation. A Darcy’s Law calculation has been added to the drainage narrative to demonstrate that the low floor is protected. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 5.Add note that the sanitary sewer service may require insulation at the time of building construction and connection (Plowe 10/15//24) Note added as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Transportation There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing single-family lot into four smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly more traffic. •Trails and sidewalks There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with none being proposed •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no wetlands identified on the site •Landscaping The Spargus Estates Landscape Plan has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. •Floodplain The Spargus Estates subdivision does not impact floodplain. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/4/2024 Page 7 Spargur Estates Engineering Review •Drainage and Utility Easements The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single- family lot (10’ front; 5’ sides). Additional easements need to be added around the perimeter of the smaller lots (10’ front and back; 5’ sides). •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement No grading agreement is required for this site. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement No stormwater maintenance agreement is required for this site. •Permits Required 1.Rice Creek Watershed District Erosion Control Permit 2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: December 11, 2024 REQUEST: Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan CASE NUMBER: PC2024-004 CR2024-004 APPLICANT: U.S. Home, LLC Attn: Josh Metzer 16355 36th Avenue N, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55446 OWNER: Hal and Pam Leibel 7566 Peltier Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55038 REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: November 14, 2024 60-Day Deadline: January 13, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: November 26, 2024 Park Board Meeting: January 2, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: December 11, 2024 City Council Work Session: January 6, 2025 City Council Meeting: N/A INTRODUCTION The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC (aka Lennar), is proposing a master planned residential development located west of CSAH 54 (20th Ave N) across from Watermark, east of Peltier Lake, and north of the City of Centerville border. The development contains four (4) parcels totaling approximately 125 gross acres and 262 housing units. The proposed development is called Peltier Ponds. 2 The Land Use Application is for the following: • PUD Concept Plan/Concept Plan (“concept plan”) Future land use applications may include: • Rezone property from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development • PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat • PUD Final Plan/Final Plat This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Applicant Narrative prepared by Lennar received on November 12, 2024 • Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plans and Plan Sheets prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. dated November 8, 2024 • Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Bruan Intertec dated October 1, 2024 • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Bruan Intertec dated August 14, 2024 • Rare Plant Survey Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources dated October 21, 2024 • Resource Inventory Report prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Traffic Impact Group, Inc. dated October 11, 2024 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. dated June 13, 2022 BACKGROUND Current Proposal Peltier Ponds will consist of single-family homes and townhomes with a similar variety to those built in Watermark. The total number of housing units is 262. See the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed description of the development. Housing Products 3 The residential development transitions from larger 90ft wide single family lots near Peltier Lake and to 80ft wide lots near Rehbein’s Peltier View platted neighborhood on the north to 65ft, 55ft, and townhomes adjacent to CSAH 54 (20th Ave N.). Land Use and Open Space The attached Land Use Plan details the proposed land uses and acres. The following table includes those land uses, acres and %. Land Use Acres % Townhomes 2.9 2.3% Single Family 80ft 9.6 7.7% Single Family 65ft 11.3 9.0% Single Family 55ft 14.4 11.5% Private Drive 3.2 2.6% Public Road Right-of-Way 19.2 15.4% Private Open Space 6.0 4.8% Public Open Space 21.0 16.8% Public Park 11.5 9.2% Stormwater Ponds 11.2 9.0% Wetlands 14.7 11.8% TOTAL 125.0 100.0% An 11 acre public park, trails, sidewalks, open space and stormwater ponds are included throughout the development creating a multi-functional greenway corridor. Public open space (public open space + public park + stormwater ponds + wetlands) is 58.4 acres or 46.7% of the entire development. Private open space is 6.0 acres or 49.6% of the townhome development. 4 Staff Comments: 1. The 90ft wide lots shall be added to all plan sheet data as another land use and house type product. ANALYSIS Existing Conditions Per the Wetland Delineation Report, the site consists primarily of row crop land with scattered farmed wetlands. A single-family home and outbuildings are located along the west central border. Wooded areas with wetlands/drainageways are in the southwest and southeast portions of the site. Topography on the site varies with high elevations at ~910 to 912 ft MSL and low elevations at ~902-904 ft MSL. A 70ft wide transmission line runs north-south through the site. A 50ft wide drainage & utility easement and stormwater pipe runs west-east through the site. Approximately the west quarter of the development is in the Shoreland Management Overlay District of Peltier Lake. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve South R, Rural and City of Centerville Rural Residential and single family dwellings Medium Density and City of Centerville East PUD (Watermark Development) Residential Low Density Mixed West Peltier Lake Peltier Lake Peltier Lake Comprehensive Plan Land Use The 125 acre site has three (3) land use designations per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan: low density, medium density, and high density. The areas are not intended to be strict land use and density boundaries but should be considered somewhat flexible to accommodate development. Met Council will require a formal comprehensive plan amendment to adjust the land use boundaries. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is in Planning District 3. The Comprehensive Plan states: 5 • Land Use o Much of District 3 was included in the I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) completed in 2005. o All development within the AUAR study area must comply with the mitigation plan that forms a part of the AUAR. Staff Comments: 1. If the project moves forward, the applicant shall show compliance with the AUAR mitigation plan. 2. Met Council will require a formal comprehensive plan amendment to adjust the land use boundaries. Density The following chart is a preliminary summary of the site’s general housing unit range and density using Met Council’s density formula: The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 221 to 342. The proposed 262 housing units meets the allowed the density range. The development’s overall net density is 3.74 units per acre. Growth Management Strategy Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City’s Growth Management Strategy. The strategy works in conjunction with the City’s utility staging plan. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5- year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2023, the City’s average annual number of units is 118. This is less the allowed 230 unit annual allocation. Gross Area Wetlands &Public Park & Arterial Other Easements Net Density Range Units Land Use Acres Buffers Open Space ROW (Transmission)Area Low High Low High Low Density Residential 40.68 2.60 4.46 1.14 1.06 31.42 1.6 3.0 50 94 Medium Density 44.33 2.65 8.80 1.14 1.06 30.68 4.0 6.0 123 184 High Density 40.01 16.69 12.12 2.28 1.00 7.92 6.0 8.0 48 63 125.02 21.94 25.38 4.56 3.12 70.02 221 342 6 With existing projects underway the project may need to be phased over multiple years to meeting growth management requirements. Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Low Density, Medium Density, High Density Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in having the property developed. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development to allow for zoning and shoreland district flexibility. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. The purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be departed from to accomplish public value purposes. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Conventional Zoning District Guidelines and PUD Flexibility Lot Width and Lot Sizes The attached PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district requirements. The chart also compares the proposed development to these guidelines. 7 The development proposes R-1X, Single Family Executive (90ft), R-1, Single Family (80ft) and R-2, Two Family single family lots (65ft) and 55ft wide lots. It also proposes R-3, Medium Density and R-4, High Density townhomes. PUD flexibility is required for the 55ft wide single family lots and high density townhome base lots. Staff Comments: 1. Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. The minimum lot areas shall also consist of buildable land exclusive of oversized easements or buffers. 2. Staff suggests the 55ft wide lots be at least 130ft deep. This would be consistent with Watermark. Setbacks The following charts compare the conventional City ordinance requirements to the proposed setbacks. Residential Single Family City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW R-1X & R-1 = 30 ft R-2 = 25 ft 30 ft 25 ft No Rear Lot Line R-1X & R-1 = 30 ft R-2 = 25 ft 30 ft 25 ft No Side Lot Line R-1X, R-1 & R-2 = 5 ft garage/ 10 ft house 80ft: 10ft and 10ft 55-65ft: 7.5 ft and 7.5 ft Yes Townhomes City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Public Street (from lot line) R3 = 30 ft R4 = 30 ft 30ft 30ft No Private Street (from back of curb) R3 = 25 ft R4 = 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft No Rear Lot Line R3 = 30 ft R4 = 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft No Side Lot Line R3 =10 ft R4 = 20 ft 10 ft 10 ft Yes 8 PUD flexibility is required for side lot line setbacks. Staff Comments: 1. Townhome deck/patio minimum setbacks: a. Main Entrance Public Street: 25ft b. CSAH 54 (20th Ave N): 40ft c. Other Public Streets: 20ft d. Main North-South Private Street: 20ft e. Individual West-East Private Streets: 15ft f. Side and Rear: 15ft 2. Townhome driveway lengths onto private driveways shall be a minimum 25ft. 3. A minimum 20-foot wide buffer in compliance with §1007.049 shall be required along CSAH 54 (20th Ave N). 4. City Code Section 1007.024(6) further details Urban Residential Planned Unit Development requirements regarding municipal water and sanitary sewer services, density, open space, neighborhood performance standards and yards. The applicant shall demonstrate these requirements are met. Shoreland Management Overlay A portion of the development is within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of Pelter Lake which is classified as a natural environment lake. Within the shoreland district, land is guided both low density and medium density. Single family dwellings are allowed in the shoreland district. These lots are non-riparian because they do not directly abut the lake due to Peltier Lake Drive and a strip of land owned by the Board of Water Commission-St. Paul. The townhomes are not in the shoreland district and therefore are not subject to shoreland PUD requirements. Lot Width and Lot Sizes The attached PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulation Chart that summarizes lot width, lot depth and lot sizes requirements. The shoreland ordinance allows for a minimum 80ft wide single family lots, two-family/duplex and triplex/quad/townhomes. The development proposes single family dwellings and townhomes; however, some of the single family lots are 65ft wide x 125ft deep. The two-family/duplex requirements are a minimum lot size of 8,775 sf and 130ft lot width. This would equate to a single family lot 65ft wide x 135ft deep. Staff Comments: 1. Staff supports PUD flexibility for the 65ft wide single family lots as long as the lot depth is 135ft and shoreland lot size requirements are met. 2. The shoreland district boundary line shall be added to all plan sheets. 9 3. Impervious surface coverage of lots in the shoreland district shall not exceed 30%. Setbacks The setback from the OHWL 884.7 EL is 150ft. This setback would only be applicable to the three (3) lots near Peltier Lake. Staff Comment: 1. The 884.7EL OHWL shall be shown on future plan sets. Building Design Standards and Other Performance Standards Building and architectural design standard review is not required at concept plan level. City Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential building design standard requirements. The conventional residential zoning districts also provide addition requirements. Staff Comments: 1. The end townhome units (1R and 5R) abutting the public street shall incorporate higher architectural standards similar to the Watermark townhomes along 21st Ave N. 2. Performance standards (architecture, parking spaces, lighting, landscaping, etc.) will be fully evaluated in with the complete submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. 3. Higher architectural standards may be required for PUD flexibility. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of residential lots and blocks. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Staff Comments: 1. The property owner’s house at 7566 Peltier Lake Drive shall be incorporated into the plat. 2. Driveway access to 7566 Peltier Lake Drive (applicant) and 7542 Peltier Lake Drive (adjacent property) shall be redesigned and redirected to the new streets. a. The applicant and/or property owner shall communicate with 7542 Peltier Lake Drive. 10 3. The section of Peltier Lake Drive adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2 shall be removed and a trail constructed. 4. A ghost plat shall be submitted as part of the preliminary plat process incorporating the two Exception lots and the property to the south. 5. The lots in Block 3 shall be reconfigured to eliminate the double frontage lots. 6. Irregular shaped lots such as Lot 10, Block 3 shall be reconfigured. 7. Lots shall not contain wetlands, buffers, or stormwater ponds. a. Block 4 shall be revised. Streets and Alleys CSAH 54 (20th Ave N) is an A-Minor Arterial Reliever road. Seventy-five (75) feet of road right-of-way is being dedicated along CSAH 54. Internal streets consist of local streets and private streets intended to serve the site. Sidewalks are provided along the streets. Peltier Lake Drive will be relocated to the east and serve as the north-south street connection. The public right-of-way will remain and a trail installed to provide public enjoyment of the lake amenity. An emergency access at the north end of the townhome private street to CSAH 54 is proposed. Anoka County Highway Department and the City Engineer generally support the access. Staff Comments: 1. Peltier Lake Drive shall be temporarily connected to the street at 7482 Peltier Lake Drive. Future development of that property will require the street to be relocated east. 2. Private streets shall be a minimum of 26 ft wide back to back. 3. Townhome driveway lengths shall be a minimum 25ft. 4. Townhome driveways shall not ingress/egress directly onto the local public street. a. The townhomes in the high density area will need to be redesigned. 5. Sidewalk shall be installed on both sides on the main east-west street. 6. The traffic study shall evaluate the need for a roundabout or traffic signal at CSAH 54 and Watermark Way. 7. Driveway access onto main street for Lots 1-3, Block 10 and Lots 13-15, Block 12 shall be re-evaluated. 8. A noise study shall be required. Easements Staff Comments: 11 1. Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all lot lines. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. 3. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands, ditches, and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The concept plan shows ten (10) stormwater ponds throughout the development. They are part of the multi-purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, and open space. Public Utilities Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. The site is in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-district 3H). Flow from these areas, including that from Centerville, is collected along East Cedar Street and conveyed east to MCES Meter M220 and Gravity Interceptor 802325. The site is in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the parcels from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025). Per the City Engineer’s Memo, the City’s water supply system well firm capacity is currently constrained by poor water quality in some wells, the White Bear Lake court orders and ongoing litigation, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors. Based on the water supply capacity and well trigger analysis completed in April 2024, the city may need to add an additional well to accommodate this development or the development may be deemed premature. The City is currently working through this process with MNDNR. The site provides opportunity to implement a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system should be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. Staff Comments: 1. The water supply issue needs to be addressed prior to PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat submittal. Yield Plan 12 As required per City Code Section 1001.026(4), the applicant submitted the attached yield plan. The yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters. The submitted yield plan indicates single family lots and townhomes totaling of 504 housing units; however, the plan does not accurately reflect allowed shoreland lot sizes and shall be revised. The proposed concept plan is 262 housing units. Phasing Plan The phasing plan indicates four (4) phases of development. Staff Comment: 1. The timing of park dedication and park and trail construction shall be further evaluated. Traffic Study Although a traffic study is not required at the time of concept plan review, one was submitted. The study states the intersections are projected to operate acceptably. A northbound left turn lane is required. Staff Comments: 1. The traffic study will be fully evaluated upon submission of the preliminary plat. 2. Anoka County requires the traffic study to analyze roundabout or traffic signal warrants at CSAH 54 and Watermark Way. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan The Park Board will review the concept plan in January 2025. Figure 10-2 of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan identifies the need for a future Neighborhood Park Area F centrally located within the service area. The proposed development includes an 11.5 acre public park and trails. Staff Comments: 1. Only land that is reasonably suitable for park use and location shall be credited for parkland dedication. 13 2. Within the public park, the land north of the trail and near the NSP easement will be dedicated to the City but park dedication will not be credited. 3. The trail near the townhomes 22R-25R and 21R-18R shall be moved over the stormwater pipe easement. 4. A trail shall be constructed along CSAH 54 (20th Ave N.). 5. Additional trails south of the wetland shall be considered. 6. Trail corridors should be a minimum 30-40 feet in width above the high water level. a. Block 11 shall be re-evaluated. Tree Preservation and Landscaping A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043(17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted. Additional landscaping may be required as a condition of the PUD. Staff Comments: 1. A landscaping screen and minimum 20ft wide buffer will be required along the CSAH 54 (20th Ave N). 2. A noise study will be required with the PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. 3. Berm and/or any noise mitigation requirements shall be measured from side or rear yard ground elevations to top of berm or fence. 4. Additional landscaping and buffer are required along the north lot line between the trail and townhome private drive. EQB Environmental Review The development is in the I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) which was completed in 2005 and subsequently updated. All development within the study area must comply with the AUAR mitigation plan. Staff Comment: 1. The applicant shall show compliance with the AUAR mitigation plan. Wetlands There are nineteen (19) wetlands indicated on the proposed project site. A majority of the wetlands (13) are shown within the currently farmed area of the parcel. These wetlands are considered degraded and have a lower biological value. Any wetlands that are impacted will need to meet mitigation requirements. Larger wetlands on the south side are within the RCWD wetland management corridor and will require a 50’ buffer. 14 Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain over the large wetland on the south side of the site. It does not appear there are any floodplain impacts. Any floodplain impacts are subject to City requirements per City Code Chapter 1103. Staff Comments: 1. A Base Flood Elevation is required to be determined, using detailed methods acceptable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2. A FEMA CLOMR and LOMR may be required for development if there are floodplain impacts. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Anoka County Highway Department comments are provided in the attached memo. City of Centerville The City of Centerville provided the following comments: 1. A trail should be considered along the west side of 20th Avenue between the southern border of Lino Lakes and the entrance road to the development. 2. The east-west road through the high density townhome area should be designed to handle traffic from the future development area directly to the west. 3. Further information on the uses proposed for the lakeside park should be provided. 4. It is assumed that Gordon Ave. North will connect to Mill Road, through the undeveloped area, at some point in the future. A trail connection through that area should be planned as well. It should be clarified what happens to Peltier Lake Drive in the interim (i.e. will it be dead ended?). School District Centennial ISD#12 did not provide comments. Lino Lakes Public Safety Police Division had no comments. 15 Fire Division notes the need for temporary cul de sacs on future street extensions and a future north-south street connection from Gordon Avenue to Peltier Lake Drive/Old Mill Road. Fire Division also has concerns regarding emergency access drive onto CSAH 54 and future staff not knowing the emergency access exists. They suggest a right in/right out turn lane at this access. These concerns shall be addressed prior to preliminary plat submittal. City Engineer City Engineer comments are provided in the attached memo. Environmental Board Environmental Board comments are provided in the attached memo. Park Board The Park Board will review the concept plan in January 2025. PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the property as depicted by the concept plan. A land use application for PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat shall be required. If required by the City Council, the developer shall have a neighborhood meeting prior to submittal of a PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 16 A master plan for this area is not required per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan-Planning District 3. (b) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The site is within the shoreland district of Peltier Lake and adjacent to a large wetland complex. The development transitions from larger single family lots near Peltier Lake to townhomes near the arterial road. The large wetland will be preserved and enhanced into a multi-purpose greenway corridor and storm water management system. The corridor will also be protected by a vegetative buffer that provides additional protection to the natural resources. The site provides opportunity to implement a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system should be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. (c) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The development transitions from larger single family lots near Peltier Lake to townhomes near the arterial road. (d) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. Private streets result in efficient, smaller networks of utilities and streets. This lowers development costs and public investments. (e) Mix of land use types. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types within low, medium and high density land uses. (f) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes and varying single family lot sizes. This variety in housing types supports life-cycle housing that is desirable to the City. 17 (g) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, page 3-3 of the Land Use Plan: Goal 1, Policy e. details the following additional public values that may be achieved in the Peltier Ponds concept plan: • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System • Using “Green” building and low impact development techniques • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches • Providing life-cycle and affordable housing • Providing infrastructure that benefits community beyond the project site that would otherwise not be financially feasible Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Variety of housing types and lot sizes from larger single family lots to townhomes. 2. Multi-functional greenway corridor and storm water management system. 3. Preservation and protection of lake and wetland natural resources. 4. Transition from low intense residential development near natural resource/lake to higher intense development near arterial roads. 5. Efficient use of land and private streets resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets. 6. Life-cycle housing. 7. Creation and preservation of open space that is accessible to the public. 8. Creation of trail corridor along Peltier Lake that is accessible to the public. 9. More parkland dedication fees available for park development. 10. Wider landscape buffers and trail corridors. 11. Detached 65ft wide single family lots vs. two family lots in the shoreland district. 12. Increased side yard setbacks from 5ft to 10ft on 80ft and 90ft wide lots. 13. Single family detached housing product vs. two-family/duplex in shoreland district. Flexibility Provided: 1. 55ft wide single family lots vs 60ft wide single family lots. 18 2. Townhome base lot size 16,620sf vs. 20,000sf. 3. Detached 65ft wide single family lots vs. two family lots in the shoreland district. 4. Decreased side yard setbacks from 10ft to 7.5ft for 55ft and 65ft wide single family lots. 5. Decreased side yard setbacks from 20ft to 10ft on townhomes in high density land use area. 6. Single family detached housing product vs. two-family/duplex in shoreland district. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the Planning & Zoning Board: 1. Are there other Benefits Gained or Flexibility Provided? 2. Should the applicant provide additional public benefits to be considered for PUD zoning? a. Examples could be more open space, enhanced greenway corridor, wetland restoration, additional wetland buffers, higher architectural & building standards, additional landscaping etc. 3. Should the applicant hold a neighborhood meeting prior to PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat submittal? Additional Staff Comments: 1. A PUD Design Guidelines Booklet shall be drafted detailing the entire development’s regulations such as building and parking setbacks, architectural standards, building heights, landscaping, signage, etc. 2. A Homeowner’s Association (HOA) will own and maintain the outlots containing public and private open space, private streets, storm ponds, landscaping, etc. 3. The City will maintain the public park, public street, trails, and stormwater ponds. 4. All plan sheets: a. Show shoreland district boundary. b. Revise Existing Zoning to R, Rural. 5. Aerial Photo Plan Sheet: a. Re-title Aerial Photo Concept Exhibit. b. Show proposed trails. 6. Concept Plan: a. Re-title Concept Plan-Density. b. Create a legend labeling red line = trail and green line = sidewalk. c. The density chart shall be consistent on all plan sheets. It is different on the two concept plan sheets. 7. Concept Plan: a. Re-title Concept Plan-Site Plan. 19 b. Create a Single Family – 90’ category. c. Add corresponding color legend to the data. d. Delete comment (*Front and Rear Stoops/Cantilever Portions/Decks/Patios of Building Are Allowed Exceptions into Setback). e. Add comment from page 8 regarding townhome patio setbacks. f. Add townhome rear setbacks. 8. Land Use Plan: a. Re-title Concept Plan-Land Use Plan. 9. Concept Plan: a. Re-title Concept Plan-Phasing Plan. b. Delete density chart. 10. Yield Plan: a. Re-title Concept Plan-Yield Plan b. Colors shall match City’s land use colors. c. Shoreland lot sizes shall meet shoreland ordinance requirements. d. Side yard setbacks (garage) shall be revised to 5ft. e. Stormwater management shall be shown. f. The total number of units shall be shown. g. No lots abut the lake. The data chart shall be revised. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Applicant’s Narrative 3. Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan Set 4. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart 5. PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart 6. City Engineer Memo dated September 5, 2024 7. Environmental Memo dated November 26, 2024 8. Anoka County Letter dated December 3, 2024 Peltier Lake Dr Rehbein StGordon AvePeltierLakeDrOld Mill Ct Rehbein St ForestLnWat e r m ark W a y 54 Legend Parcels December 5, 2024 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 500 Ft Peltier Ponds Site Location & Aerial MapAttachment 1: Site Location & Aerial Map NARRATIVE: Peltier Ponds - Single-Family & Townhome Residential Community U.S. Home, LLC, dba Lennar, is pleased to submit this request for Sketch Plat Review for a proposed single- family and townhome community composed of 262 homes. Existing Conditions The subject property is located on the west side of 20th Ave N (CSAH 54) just across from Watermark, east of Peltier Lake Drive, and north of the Centerville city border. The site is 125.02 gross acres (79.21 net developable acres) in size and is currently farmed agricultural land with wetlands and pockets of wooded upland and lowland. The site is currently guided Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential. Nineteen wetlands have been delineated on the site totaling 15.66 acres in size. Guided Land Uses and (current use of land) surrounding the subject property include: •North – Guided Urban Reserve (single-family residential – Rehbein’s Peltier View); •West – Guided Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Open Water (two single-family homesteads and Peltier Lake); •Southwest – Guided Medium Density Residential (50-acre single-family homestead) •South – City of Centerville (single-family residential and open space); •East – Guided Low Density Mixed Residential (20th Ave N & Watermark). Description of Requests Lennar is requesting Sketch Plat Review of the proposed single family and townhome community named Peltier Ponds. Eventually we will request a rezoning of the subject property from Rural to PUD to align with the guided Land Use of the property and will be submitting a Preliminary Plat application upon completion of the Sketch Plat process. Proposed Homes and Architecture Peltier Ponds will consist of single-family homes and townhomes with a similar variety to those built in Watermark. CMA back-to-back townhome CMS row townhome 55-foot single-family lots 65-foot single-family lots 80-foot single-family lots Bedrooms 3 3 2 to 4 3 to 5 3 to 5 Home Sq Ft 1770-1800 1800-1900 942-2400 1920-3876 1920-3876 Garage Stalls 2 2 2 to 3 3 3 to 4 Garage Sq Ft 405 379-388 396-744 634-731 634-951 Price Range TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Unit Count 74 39 75 49 25 262 Infrastructure Peltier Ponds is located adjacent to existing residential developments. As a result, infrastructure is readily available for extension to serve this development. Attachment 2: Applicant’s Narrative Access for the new neighborhood will be provided through the westward extension of Watermark Way and a southward extension of Gordon Ave. Access will also be provided from Peltier Lake Drive on the north, however, from this point Peltier Lake Drive will be moved away from the lake and redirected internally into the new neighborhood. The existing Peltier Lake Drive will be abandoned and possibly turned into a trail in the future. The single-family homes and all but four of the row townhomes will be served by public streets with a curb-to-curb street width of 32 feet. The back-to-back townhomes will all be served by private streets. Public Park, Open Space, Trails, and Sidewalks Lennar is proposing the dedication of 11.14 acres of land in the central and west portions of the site intended for a City park. Approximately 7.7 acres of the site is being preserved in open space. When including the park, ponding areas, and wetlands 58.3 acres will be open space which constitutes 47% of the site. We intend to include a series of trails within the community, final locations and alignment will be determined as we move further along with grading and stormwater design, but at this point there are 1.08 miles of trails proposed. Sidewalks will be constructed on one side of each public street. The public park areas will be deeded to the City and trails within the park will be maintained by the City. Common open spaces will likely be owned by the HOA and trails outside of park maintained by the HOA. Trees and Landscape Buffers Given the long-term agricultural use of the property, and large presence of wetlands, much of the site is void of trees. There are, however, a few large clusters of trees in the southern wetlands, along the north property line, near the homesteads by the lake, and around the creek in the center of the site where the park is proposed to be located. There was a total of 2,190 trees were inventoried. As with most new residential developments Lennar is proposing the removal of 318 trees from the site, which means roughly 85.5% will be preserved. Lennar will be planting trees in accordance with City Code requirements. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goals The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan guides the subject properties Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential. This is a complicated site to design to meet density requirements given the scattered location of wetlands and the need to provide ponding, but PUD zoning would provide the flexibility to offer the proposed mix of townhomes and three base lot width standards for the single-family homes to achieve the density required by the Comp Plan. The proposed plan meets density requirements in the Low Density area but is below minimum density in the Medium Density area and High Density areas. However, as the tables below demonstrate, the overall minimum density range needed (3.0 units/acre) can be reached when combining Low, Medium, and High Density calculations together. This, along with 18.84 acres being preserved in park/open space, the preservation of wetlands and trees, and the creation of a public park, the proposed concept plan aligns with goals outlined in the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Leibel Property Use Net Acres Density Unit Range Proposed Units Density LDR (1.6 - 3.0 units/acre) 35.69 58 - 108 99 2.77 units/acre (within density requirements) MDR (4.0 - 6.0 units/acre) 28.53 114 – 172 112 3.93 units/acre (below minimum density required) HDR (6.0 - 8.0 units/acre) 15.00 90 - 120 51 3.40 units/acre (below density requirements) 79.21 222 - 344 262 3.31 units/acre Goal 1: Create a unified vision and future for the city, promote a well-planned community, prevent fragmented development, address the impacts of development and redevelopment on natural resources, aesthetics and view corridors, and provide balanced land use and connectivity that ensures the integration of both sides of the regional park. • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System and Rice Creek Watershed District’s Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan. • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems. • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches. • Providing life-cycle and affordable housing. Peltier Ponds will be preserving 18.84 acres of upland open space (58.3 acres of open space if ponding and wetland areas were included) which is 47% of the site. This plan proposes the dedication of a 11.14-acre park at the west side of the community near Peltier Lake. Of the 15.58 acres of wetland located on the site 14.55 acres will be preserved along with the creation of 6.35 acres of wetland buffers. Five of the wetlands (2.44 acres combined) on site are being restored from their current farmed agricultural state to revitalized wetlands. As mentioned, there will be nine (9) stormwater ponds constructed which will treat stormwater runoff prior to it entering the natural systems of wetlands, creeks, and lakes. By offering two types of townhomes and the various floorplans that can be built on 55-foot, 65-foot, and 80-foot wide lots Peltier Ponds will certainly provide Lino Lakes residents options for life-cycle housing. Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. • Link trails to parks, lakes, and schools. • Encourage pedestrian activity in residential areas by providing sidewalks and trails as well as connections to existing and future pedestrian or transit facilities. We are working to define the final layout for trails, but the goal will be to provide connections between the Peltier Ponds park, Peltier Lake, and 20thAve/Hwy 54 which would provide a connection to Watermark trails and Watermark Park. Sidewalks will also be provided on all public streets. Goal 4: Maintain safe neighborhoods and community areas. • Develop neighborhoods with mixed housing styles that promote diversity and attract all age groups. The proposed mix of homes should attract buyers of all ages and demographics from young single first-time buyers, couples, families with children, empty-nesters, and retirees. Goal 7: Sustain Lino Lakes’ Natural Resources which make it such a desirable place to live. • Protect and preserve the natural resources throughout the city. • Continue to promote the use of Planned Unit Developments (PUD) as the city’s preferred development process to implement the Greenway System. Please see comments provided for Goal 1 and Goal 3 above. In addition, 1,872 trees will be preserved out of the 2,190 trees existing on site today. Many of which are located in the proposed park and open spaces. Comprehensive Plan Parks, Open Space, and Trail Goals Goal 1: Continue development and maintenance of an appropriate balance of active and passive recreational activities to serve the diverse needs of the community for people of all ages and abilities, including, where possible, neighborhood parks, larger multi-use community parks and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park). •Acquire, reserve, develop and maintain sufficient park and open space land to fulfill the identified and projected needs of the present and future populations. •Continue, whenever possible, inclusion of neighborhood parks in future developments and planned redevelopments. •Direct and manage activities in an appropriate manner by balancing the use of programming activities in the neighborhood parks. As mentioned in the response for Land Use Goal 1, this plan proposes the dedication of an 11.14- acre park near the center and west area of the community. Goal 2: Collaborate with Anoka County to guarantee and improve public access of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park) waterways for recreational use and enjoyment of the community. •Identify, develop and maintain new public access points to area lakes and waterways so that residents can enjoy these unique recreational opportunities. There is an opportunity for the City to create and offer a new public access point to Peltier Lake at the western edge of the proposed park dedication area. Goal 3: Develop, maintain and connect the current and proposed trails and greenway systems in the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park) in a manner that preserves and sustains the natural environment. •Preserve the open character of Lino Lakes through the preservation of natural open space and the establishment of greenway corridors. •To the extent possible, require an interconnected trail system to be developed concurrently with the infrastructure of the subdivision or new development. Please see comments provided for Land Use Goal 3 above. Goal 4: Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological and aquatic resources of the community. •Where possible, restore damaged or misused natural and ecologically significant areas to their original state. •Require natural space buffers, where appropriate, around wetlands to preserve their function and value. Please see wetland comments provided for Land Use Goal 1 above. Goal 5: To provide city residents with parks, trails, greenways and natural areas for protection of the natural environment, recreational uses, as visual/physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban development, and as a means to maintain the character, ambiance, appearance and history of the community. •The city shall reserve the right to acquire land within all development areas for park, natural open space, greenways and trail purposes. •Parkland dedication policies and ordinances shall be used by the city to require each developer (of all land use categories) to dedicate land, or at the discretion of the city provide a payment in lieu for all or part, for parks, trails, greenways and open space acquisition and development. •Alternatives to direct acquisition of property, such as conservation easements, shall be used where appropriate to set aside land for park and open space purposes. Please see comments provided for Land Use Goal 1 and Goal 3 above. The proposed open spaces would be placed under conservation easements. Goal 7: Identify important existing natural resources for protection and work cooperatively with developers and landowners to encourage healthy natural resource systems to retain the existing natural character of the community through education. •Encourage the preservation of natural vegetation including plants of oak savannas, prairies, woodlands, wetlands and aquatic vegetation to be a design consideration for new subdivisions. As mentioned above, this plan will restore and preserve 2.44 acres of wetlands, preserve trees, and create new open spaces for natural vegetation to grow. Schedule Land development work (grading) would begin in Spring 2025 with continued grading and utility/street construction getting started in Summer 2025. The overall project will likely be developed in four phases. Lennar estimates full occupancy of the community will occur approximately 5 years from the date sales begin. Lennar has a long-standing history of building successful communities throughout the Twin Cities, including similar such as Watermark (Lino Lakes), North Meadows (Blaine), and Willowbrooke (Oakdale). We invite you to visit any of these communities and our website at lennar.com/new- homes/minnesota/minneapolis-st-paul. We look forward to this opportunity to continue working with the City of Lino Lakes and thank the City for its support. Regards, Josh Metzer Land Entitlement Manager Lennar Minnesota CITY OF CENTERVILLER2A - HIGH-DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL (CENTERVILLE)PELTIER LAKE (2-4)OHWL 884.7FIRM BFE 888.0FIS BFE 887.7R2 - SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL (CENTERVILLE)PUD - ORD. 04-16(WATERMARK DEVELOPMENT)R - RURALR - RURALR - RURALR - RURALCITY OF LINO LAKESPELTIER LAKE DROLD MILL CT20TH AVE N (CSAH NO 54)WATERMARK WAYREHBEIN STGORDON AVE N PELTIER LAKE DR EXISTING ZONINGR - RURALEXISTING ZONINGR - RURALEXISTING ZONINGR - RURALEXISTING ZONINGR - RURALR2 - SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL (CENTERVILLE)R - RURALR - RURALR - RURALR - RURALR - RURALZONING PER ZONING MAP EFFECTIVEJANUARY 5,2023Attachment 3: Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan Set 9 11 11 10 VICINITY MAP & SHEET INDEX LEGEND FOUND CIM FOUND IRON PIPE SET IRON PIPE MAILBOX SIGN TELEPHONE BOX TELEVISION BOX OVERHEAD UTILITY GUY WIRE POWER POLE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER FENCE FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE VAULT DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS CAD FILE PROJECT NO. FILE NO. To U.S. Home, LLC; and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7(a), 8, 11(a), 13, 15, and 18 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on July 22, 2024. Date of Plat or Map: July 24, 2024 James R. Hill, Inc. Marcus F. Hampton, Land Surveyor, MN License No. 47481 CERTIFICATION WEST C.R. S8ITE 1 B8RNSVILLE 0N 3PHONE .. PKDPSWRQ#MUKLQF.FRPPLANNERS EN*INEERS S8RVEYORSZZZ.MUKLQF.FRPJames R. Hill, Inc.NOT TO SCALE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE SEE SHEET 2 OF 3PELTIER LAKE20TH AVE N24TH AVE NMAIN ST 170TH ST N 61 35W 35E 1 0FH V.GZJ 1 SHEET 1 OF 3LEIBEL PROPERTYLINO LA.ES 0INNESOTAALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYFORLENNAR2 3 FLOOD ZONE A SCHEDULE B EXCEPTION NO.# 1.The bearing system is based on the Anoka County Coordinate System. The east line of Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 22 minutes 33 seconds East. SURVEY NOTES Description per Title Commitment: Parcel 1 The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2 The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property Per Title Commitment No. ORTE749988, dated 06/24/2024, issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. Easements and servitudes benefiting or burdening the surveyed property, listed in Schedule B-II of the Commitment, are listed below using the same numbering system as in said Schedule B-II. Items 1-8 are not survey-related items and are not listed below. 9. Terms and conditions of Easement in favor of The Rural Cooperative Power Association as created in document filed December 10, 1963, as Document No. 256008. The easement is shown on the survey. 10. Terms and conditions set forth in Drainage and Utility Easement Agreement dated April 12, 2021, filed May 6, 2021, as Document No. 2317274.001. The permanent easements are shown on the survey. The temporary easements have expired. 11. Right of way for Peltier Lake Drive as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 12. Subject to 20th Ave North aka County State Aid Highway No. 54 as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 13. Rights of Anoka County for Branch No. 1 of County Ditch No. 72 as shown on available County Maps over the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. The approximate location of the, per available maps, is shown on the survey. There was no observed evidence of a ditch at the time of the field survey. SURVEYED PROPERTY 1.Monuments have been placed at all corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses in close proximity to the corner, as shown on the survey. 2.The subject property addresses are unassigned, and its property identification numbers are 14.31.22.12.0002, 14.31.22.11.0001, 14.31.22.11.0002, and 14.31.22.14.0001. 3.The subject property lies within Flood Plain Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain) and Zone A (no base flood elevations determined) per Federal Insurance Rate Map No. 27003C0366E dated 12/16/2015. 4.The gross area of the surveyed property is 125.03 Acres or 5,446,073 Sq. Ft. The overall net area is 122.20 Acres or 5,322,859 Sq. Ft. 5.Vertical relief shown hereon was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources mapping application, MnTOPO. 7.There are no buildings present on the surveyed property. 8.Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork are shown on the survey. 11.a) Source information from plans and markings has been combined with observed evidence of utilities to to develop a view of underground utilities. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, some utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. The surveyor has compiled the markings made on the ground, the maps provided, and the observed evidence to show utilities hereon. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation and/or a private utility locate request may be necessary. Pursuant to MS 216.D contact Gopher State One Call at 651-454-0002 prior to any excavation. 13.The names, address and property identification numbers of adjoining owners according to current public records are shown on the survey. 18.Plottable offsite easements disclosed in documents provided to the surveyor are shown on the survey. "TABLE A" NOTES 9 12 13 LEGEND DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS CAD FILE PROJECT NO. FILE NO.2 WEST C.R. 2 S8ITE B8RNSVILLE 0N 3PHONE 2.. PKDPSWRQ#MUKLQF.FRPPLANNERS EN*INEERS S8RVEYORSZZZ.MUKLQF.FRPJames R. Hill, Inc.NOT TO SCALE SEE SHEET 1 OF 3SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 PELTIER LAKE20TH AVE N24TH AVE NMAIN ST 170TH ST N 61 35W 35E 0FH 22 SHEET 2 OF 3LEIBEL PROPERTYLINO LA.ES 0INNESOTAALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYFORVICINITY MAP & SHEET INDEX 1 2 3 FOUND CIM FOUND IRON PIPE SET IRON PIPE MAILBOX SIGN TELEPHONE BOX TELEVISION BOX OVERHEAD UTILITY GUY WIRE POWER POLE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER FENCE FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE VAULT BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE FLOOD ZONE A SCHEDULE B EXCEPTION NO.# 1.The bearing system is based on the Anoka County Coordinate System. The east line of Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 22 minutes 33 seconds East. SURVEY NOTES Description per Title Commitment: Parcel 1 The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2 The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property Per Title Commitment No. ORTE749988, dated 06/24/2024, issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. Easements and servitudes benefiting or burdening the surveyed property, listed in Schedule B-II of the Commitment, are listed below using the same numbering system as in said Schedule B-II. Items 1-8 are not survey-related items and are not listed below. 9. Terms and conditions of Easement in favor of The Rural Cooperative Power Association as created in document filed December 10, 1963, as Document No. 256008. The easement is shown on the survey. 10. Terms and conditions set forth in Drainage and Utility Easement Agreement dated April 12, 2021, filed May 6, 2021, as Document No. 2317274.001. The permanent easements are shown on the survey. The temporary easements have expired. 11. Right of way for Peltier Lake Drive as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 12. Subject to 20th Ave North aka County State Aid Highway No. 54 as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 13. Rights of Anoka County for Branch No. 1 of County Ditch No. 72 as shown on available County Maps over the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. The approximate location of the, per available maps, is shown on the survey. There was no observed evidence of a ditch at the time of the field survey. SURVEYED PROPERTY 1.Monuments have been placed at all corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses in close proximity to the corner, as shown on the survey. 2.The subject property addresses are unassigned, and its property identification numbers are 14.31.22.12.0002, 14.31.22.11.0001, 14.31.22.11.0002, and 14.31.22.14.0001. 3.The subject property lies within Flood Plain Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain) and Zone A (no base flood elevations determined) per Federal Insurance Rate Map No. 27003C0366D dated 12/16/2015. 4.The gross area of the surveyed property is 125.03 Acres or 5,446,073 Sq. Ft. The overall net area is 122.20 Acres or 5,322,859 Sq. Ft. 5.Vertical relief shown hereon was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources mapping application, MnTOPO. 7.There are no buildings present on the surveyed property. 8.Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork are shown on the survey. 11.a) Source information from plans and markings has been combined with observed evidence of utilities to to develop a view of underground utilities. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, some utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. The surveyor has compiled the markings made on the ground, the maps provided, and the observed evidence to show utilities hereon. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation and/or a private utility locate request may be necessary. Pursuant to MS 216.D contact Gopher State One Call at 651-454-0002 prior to any excavation. 13.The names, address and property identification numbers of adjoining owners according to current public records are shown on the survey. 18.Plottable offsite easements disclosed in documents provided to the surveyor are shown on the survey. "TABLE A" NOTES 2222 22V.GZJ 22LENNAR FLOOD ZONE A NO %ASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETER0INED 12 10 9 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS 0FH CAD FILE PROJECT NO. FILE NO. SHEET 3 OF 3LEIBEL PROPERTYLINO LA.ES 0INNESOTAALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYFOR WEST C.R. S8ITE B8RNSVILLE 0N 3PHONE .. PKDPSWRQ#MUKLQF.FRPPLANNERS EN*INEERS S8RVEYORSZZZ.MUKLQF.FRPJames R. Hill, Inc.SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 LEGEND NOT TO SCALE PELTIER LAKE20TH AVE N24TH AVE NMAIN ST 170TH ST N 61 35W 35E VICINITY MAP & SHEET INDEX 1 2 3 FOUND CIM FOUND IRON PIPE SET IRON PIPE MAILBOX SIGN TELEPHONE BOX TELEVISION BOX OVERHEAD UTILITY GUY WIRE POWER POLE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER FENCE FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE VAULT BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE FLOOD ZONE A SCHEDULE B EXCEPTION NO.# V.GZJ LENNAR1.The bearing system is based on the Anoka County Coordinate System. The east line of Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 22 minutes 33 seconds East. SURVEY NOTES Description per Title Commitment: Parcel 1 The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2 The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property Per Title Commitment No. ORTE749988, dated 06/24/2024, issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. Easements and servitudes benefiting or burdening the surveyed property, listed in Schedule B-II of the Commitment, are listed below using the same numbering system as in said Schedule B-II. Items 1-8 are not survey-related items and are not listed below. 9. Terms and conditions of Easement in favor of The Rural Cooperative Power Association as created in document filed December 10, 1963, as Document No. 256008. The easement is shown on the survey. 10. Terms and conditions set forth in Drainage and Utility Easement Agreement dated April 12, 2021, filed May 6, 2021, as Document No. 2317274.001. The permanent easements are shown on the survey. The temporary easements have expired. 11. Right of way for Peltier Lake Drive as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 12. Subject to 20th Ave North aka County State Aid Highway No. 54 as laid out and traveled. The right of way is shown on the survey. 13. Rights of Anoka County for Branch No. 1 of County Ditch No. 72 as shown on available County Maps over the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. The approximate location of the, per available maps, is shown on the survey. There was no observed evidence of a ditch at the time of the field survey. SURVEYED PROPERTY 1.Monuments have been placed at all corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses in close proximity to the corner, as shown on the survey. 2.The subject property addresses are unassigned, and its property identification numbers are 14.31.22.12.0002, 14.31.22.11.0001, 14.31.22.11.0002, and 14.31.22.14.0001. 3.The subject property lies within Flood Plain Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain) and Zone A (no base flood elevations determined) per Federal Insurance Rate Map No. 27003C0366D dated 12/16/2015. 4.The gross area of the surveyed property is 125.03 Acres or 5,446,073 Sq. Ft. The overall net area is 122.20 Acres or 5,322,859 Sq. Ft. 5.Vertical relief shown hereon was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources mapping application, MnTOPO. 7.There are no buildings present on the surveyed property. 8.Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork are shown on the survey. 11.a) Source information from plans and markings has been combined with observed evidence of utilities to to develop a view of underground utilities. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely, and reliably depicted. In addition, some utility locate requests from surveyors may be ignored or result in an incomplete response. The surveyor has compiled the markings made on the ground, the maps provided, and the observed evidence to show utilities hereon. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation and/or a private utility locate request may be necessary. Pursuant to MS 216.D contact Gopher State One Call at 651-454-0002 prior to any excavation. 13.The names, address and property identification numbers of adjoining owners according to current public records are shown on the survey. 18.Plottable offsite easements disclosed in documents provided to the surveyor are shown on the survey. "TABLE A" NOTES 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORSDRAWN BYDATEREVISIONSPLM7/29/24CAD FILE24205cp.dwgPRO-ECT NO.24205-00SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.PELTIER PONDS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA CONCEPT PLAN FOR LENNARThe Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, MinnesotaANDThe South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31,Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’sSubdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner ofsaid Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Sectionline for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West,following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of saidGovernment Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East,along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaidpublic road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, toaforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerlinefor 22 feet to the point of beginning.ANDThe Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.ANDThe North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota describedas follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet tothe actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersectionwith the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thenceSouth 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet;thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONA. 8/14/24: Updated layoutB. 8/27/24: Updated layoutC. 8/28/24: Density tableD. 11/11/24: Concept Revision 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORSDRAWN BYDATEREVISIONSPLM7/29/24CAD FILE24205cp.dwgPRO-ECT NO.24205-00SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.PELTIER PONDS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA CONCEPT PLAN FOR LENNARThe Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, MinnesotaANDThe South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31,Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’sSubdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner ofsaid Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Sectionline for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West,following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of saidGovernment Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East,along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaidpublic road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, toaforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerlinefor 22 feet to the point of beginning.ANDThe Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.ANDThe North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota describedas follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet tothe actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersectionwith the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thenceSouth 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet;thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONA. 8/14/24: Updated layoutB. 8/27/24: Updated layoutC. 8/28/24: Density tableD. 11/11/24: Concept Revision 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORSDRAWN BYDATEREVISIONSPLM7/29/24CAD FILE24205cp.dwgPRO-ECT NO.24205-00SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.PELTIER PONDS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA LAND USE PLAN FOR LENNARThe Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, MinnesotaANDThe South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31,Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’sSubdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner ofsaid Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Sectionline for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West,following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of saidGovernment Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East,along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaidpublic road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, toaforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerlinefor 22 feet to the point of beginning.ANDThe Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.ANDThe North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota describedas follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet tothe actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersectionwith the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thenceSouth 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet;thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONA. 8/14/24: Updated layoutB. 8/27/24: Updated layoutC. 8/28/24: Density tableD. 11/11/24: Concept RevisionD. 11/19/24: Land Use Plan 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORSDRAWN BYDATEREVISIONSPLM7/29/24CAD FILE24205cp.dwgPRO-ECT NO.24205-00SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.PELTIER PONDS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA CONCEPT PLAN FOR LENNARThe Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, MinnesotaANDThe South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31,Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’sSubdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner ofsaid Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Sectionline for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West,following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of saidGovernment Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East,along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaidpublic road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, toaforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerlinefor 22 feet to the point of beginning.ANDThe Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.ANDThe North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota describedas follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet tothe actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersectionwith the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thenceSouth 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet;thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONA. 8/14/24: Updated layoutB. 8/27/24: Updated layoutC. 8/28/24: Density tableD. 11/11/24: Concept RevisionPhase 1 - 87 homesPhase 3 - 58 homesPhase 4 - 65 homesPhase 2 - 52 homesPhase 4 trail constructionPhase 3 trail constructionPhase 4 park and trail construction 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.com PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS'RAWN BY'ATEREVISIONSPLM11/8/2024CA' FILE24205yeild.dwgPRO-ECT NO.24205-00SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.LEIBEL SITE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA YEILD PLAN FOR LENNARThe Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, MinnesotaANDThe South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31,Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’sSubdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner ofsaid Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Sectionline for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West,following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of saidGovernment Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East,along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaidpublic road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, toaforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerlinefor 22 feet to the point of beginning.ANDThe Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.ANDThe North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota describedas follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet tothe actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersectionwith the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thenceSouth 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet;thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point ofbeginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, AnokaCounty, Minnesota.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PELTIER PONDS PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart PUD Concept Plan dated November 11, 2024 Correlating Conventional Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Zoning District Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Low Density Res R-1X, Single Family Executive single family 90 135 12,825 90 150 13,500 No R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 65 125 8,125 No R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 55 125 6,875 Yes R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot)50 150 7,500 NA, no two-family dwellings proposed Medium Density Res R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 65 125 8,125 No R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 55 125 6,875 Yes R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family (unit lot)50 NA 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome (base)100 NA 24,000 144 NA 25,000 No High Density Res R-4, High Density Residential two-family (unit lot)50 NA 6,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome or other multi-family (base)100 NA 20,000 128 NA 16,620 Yes Note: Comp Plan Amendment required to change land use boundaries. Currently, townhomes are proposed in low density area. NA-no two-family dwellings proposed NA-no two-family dwellings proposed Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development 12/5/2024 City of Lino Lakes PUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan Attachment 4: PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart PELTIER PONDS PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart PUD Concept Plan dated November 11, 2024 Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Shoreland Regulations Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Low Density Res R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-1X, Single Family Executive single family 90 135 12,825 NA-no R-1X dwellings proposed R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family*65 135 8,775 65 125 8,125 Yes** Medium Density Res R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family*65 135 8,775 65 125 8,125 Yes** *Shoreland ordinance allows for two-family/duplex with a minimum lot size of 8,775 sf and 130ft lot width. This would equate to a single family lot 65ft wide x 135ft deep. ** Staff supports PUD flexibility for the 65ft wide single family lots as long as the lot depth is 135ft and shoreland lot size requirements are met. Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development 12/5/2024 City of Lino LakesPUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan Attachment 5: PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart PELTIER PONDS PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart PUD Concept Plan dated November 11, 2024 Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Shoreland Regulations Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Low Density Res R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-1X, Single Family Executive single family 90 135 12,825 NA-no R-1X dwellings proposed R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family*65 135 8,775 65 125 8,125 Yes** Medium Density Res R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family*65 135 8,775 65 125 8,125 Yes** *Shoreland ordinance allows for two-family/duplex with a minimum lot size of 8,775 sf and 130ft lot width. This would equate to a single family lot 65ft wide x 135ft deep. ** Staff supports PUD flexibility for the 65ft wide single family lots as long as the lot depth is 135ft and shoreland lot size requirements are met. Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development 12/5/2024 City of Lino LakesPUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Peltier Ponds PUD Concept Plan 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: December 4, 2024 Re: Peltier Ponds Concept Plan Review 027404-000 WSB’s review of the Concept Plans for the Peltier Ponds development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by James R. Hill and received November 12, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Peltier Ponds - Concept Plan prepared by James R. Hill, dated November 11, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering •General The Peltier Ponds development includes 125 acres between 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and Peltier Lake, south of Rehbein Street. The current conceptual project proposes 262 units and associated infrastructure. An AUAR was prepared for this area in 2005 and last updated in 2020. The future preliminary plat submittal will need to be in conformance with the AUAR. •Grading The Peltier Ponds Development includes site grading for the 262 units as well as extensions of Peltier Lake Drive, Gordon Avenue, Watermark Way and approximately six local streets that are yet to be named. •Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Peltier Ponds Development has not yet been proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the development will include a storm sewer conveyance, rear yard drainage, and ponding systems. The systems shall meet the City’s and Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) Stormwater Management requirements as well as the Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area Comprehensive Water Surface Management Plan (CWSMP - September 2018) requirements (Chapter 1011.011 Subpart 10b). Stormwater reuse will be required throughout the development for irrigation. Attachment 6: City Engineer Memo dated September 5, 2024 Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04/2024 Page 2 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review •Water Supply The City’s water supply system well firm capacity should meet or exceed its maximum day demand. This criteria is currently constrained by poor water quality in some wells, the White Bear Lake court orders and ongoing litigation, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors. Based on the water supply capacity and well trigger analysis completed in April 2024, excluding Well No. 2 due to poor water quality, if the City is able to add Well No. 7 then the system could serve approximately 7,300 households (about 1,400 households more than the existing 5,900 households) before Well No. 8 is needed. The final number of available households will need to be determined as the project progresses. The City has begun conversations with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) about permitting Well No. 7 and is awaiting confirmation whether it can be constructed at this time given the ongoing White Bear Lake litigation. Applicant to verify water pressure is adequate for all locations within the development. The watermain will need to be looped through the site and will need to include a 12-inch diameter trunk watermain stubbed to the north as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. All proposed units are required to be on the municipal water supply. Water infrastructure for the Peltier Ponds Addition has not yet been designed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the existing 12” DIP trunk main on Watermark Way will need to be extended west through the development northern boundary similar to what is shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A 12” stub will need to be extended to the north towards Rehbein’s Peltier View. Otherwise, the development will include a water system with predominately 8- inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot. Water supply will need to be evaluated in conjunction with current pending DNR water appropriation approvals. Additional water stubs will be extended to the south. The south portion of the development is in the City’s Drinking Water Study Management Area and would be subject to those requirements. •Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Peltier Ponds Development has not yet been proposed and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the existing 10- inch diameter poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) trunk main on Watermark Way will be extended west to serve the proposed addition. The remainder of the addition will need to be evaluated by the applicant as to whether a lift station as shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan is necessary. If necessary, the lift station will need to be oversized to accommodate the remaining sanitary sewer district 3H. Oversizing costs for the lift station will be credited by the City. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with 4-inch Schedule 40 PVC service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the north and south. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04/2024 Page 3 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review •Transportation A general street layout has been proposed with the Concept Plan. The City of Lino Lakes’ Comprehensive Plan requires neighborhood street connections. The applicant is showing connections with the right of way to Peltier Lake Drive and Gordan Avenue in the northwest portion of the development. The City’s Engineering and Public Safety departments submit that the roadway connection to Peltier Lake Drive to the south shall be constructed to maintain continuity. The roads stubbed to the southern development limits will need to be evaluated for feasibility with future connections. A traffic study will be required and reviewed with the preliminary plat. An intersection evaluation for the intersection of Watermark Way and CSAH 54 should be conducted as required by Anoka County. An emergency access to CSAH 54 is proposed to be installed at the north end of the private road stub. This access will be evaluated by the City’s Fire Official for acceptance. Trails and sidewalks Trails are proposed extending from Peltier Lake in the southwest corner to the northeast corner of the development near the multifamily units as well as generally along the existing trunk storm sewer line from CSAH 54 to the center of the development. Sidewalks are shown along one side of all of the public streets on the submitted Concept Plan. The abandoned segment of Peltier Lake Drive along the lake will need to be converted to a City Trail. A City trail will need to be installed along the west side of CSAH 54 for the length of the development. Additional trail and sidewalk segments may need to be included throughout the site at the direction of the City Planner. •Wetlands and Environment The project indicates that there are approximately 15.58 acres of wetland. A wetland replacement plan based on the impacts will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through RCWD and the City. The site is located in the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. Any disturbed buffer areas should be seeded with a seed mix containing native, non-invasive, species. Review of the DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System database indicates the potential presence of several protected species within and near the project area, including protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for additional studies or surveys. The applicant will need to conduct a Cultural Resource Assessment of the development site through SHPO. Ms. Katie Larsen 12/04/2024 Page 4 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review •Landscaping A Landscape Plan for the Peltier Ponds development has not yet been submitted. One will need to be submitted and reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. Screening will need to be provided on the east side of the multi-family units adjacent to CSAH 54. •Floodplain The southern portion of the Peltier Ponds development appears to be in the floodplain however, it does not appear that it is impacted by any proposed construction. •Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features. The western 75’ feet of CSAH 54 should be dedicated as right of way to Anoka County. •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Peltier Ponds development will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Borrow areas / Lakes area will be maintained by the HOA. •Permits Required Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1.NPDES General Construction Permit 2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3.Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5.Rice Creek Watershed District Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: November 26, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments – Peltier Ponds Environmental Board had recommended the following at their November 26, 2024 meeting: 1.The buffer for wetland 10 appears to connect to the rear property line of lots 8 &9 block 12. Where possible ensure buffers are met and expanded prior to private property to limit future encroachment from adjacent property owners. a.Provide increased buffer widths around wetland where the trail is going past these locations. Buffers should be extended throughout the park land to provide pretreat of runoff before discharging to the wetlands. b.Show buffers in between the trail and existing channel shown on the proposed plans. c.All wetlands should be included in conservation easements. d.This area is included in the RCWD wetland corridor plan. With future submittals impacts and mitigation of wetlands will be required. i.Wetlands falling within the wetland corridor will require 50’ buffers 2.The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a.A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b.Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals c.Redundant perimeter control will be required around all wetlands onsite where a 50’ natural buffer cannot be maintained during construction. Redundant perimeter control should be spaced 3-5’ apart. 3.Rice Creek Watershed District shows Anoka County Ditch 72 branch 1 running through the site. Verify the location and use of the ditch with the watershed. Ditch Environmental Memo Attachment 7: Environmental memo dated November 26, 2024 Page 2 location and drainage should be shown on the plan set if it is required to be maintained. 4.The project site is located with the I-35 E corridor AUAR. As part of the planning the AUAR mitigation checklist should be used. a. This area is listed as an area of cultural significance and will need to be investigated. 5.Building setbacks to Peltier Lake should be shown on the plant set to confirm 150’ setback requirements are met. 6.Confirm building heights, open space, and impervious cover within the shoreland area to confirm all requirements are being met. 7.Building height should be limited to a maximum of 36’ or less in the shoreland zone. Confirm heights of buildings on future submittals. 8.Provide conservation easements over all wetland and open space in the development to ensure connectivity with existing and future development. a.A contiguous path should be created from the lake extending east to 35E and beyond. 9.Retain 50’ wide drainage & utility easement over trunk storm sewer. 10.Provide removal of dead ash trees within dedicated park and open space to limit maintenance required by the city once ownership is transferred. 11.Within the tree preservation plan break down the removals between the basic use area and where mitigation is required. a.Stormwater BMP’s are not included in the basic land use area. Currently removal of trees is being shown for stormwater ponding and would require mitigation. 12.Provide additional detail on stormwater management BMP’s. Infiltration should be proposed where feasible based on soil types and depth of groundwater. 13.A stormwater treatment train that filters and treats stormwater runoff as it flows through the site should be developed. Any opportunities to incorporate natural treatment systems into the project should be encouraged. Page 3 14.Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse. 15.The southern portion of the site is within the Lino Lakes drinking water supply management area. a.This area is considered moderately vulnerable, and considerations should be taken into account for the proposed project. Anoka County TRANSPORTATION DIVISION Highway Katie Larson City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Concept Plan -Peltier Ponds Dear Katie, December 3, 2024 We have reviewed the Concept Plan for Peltier Ponds to be located west of CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) across from Watermark Way within the City of Lino Lakes, and I offer the following comments: •The proposed right of way along CSAH 54 is 75 feet west of centerline. There are also chamfers at Watermark Way mirroring the east side. This should be sufficient for future reconstruction purposes. •We would like the traffic study to take a look at whether a roundabouUtraffic signal will be warranted at the intersection of 20th Avenue/Watermark Way using future volumes. •The right of access should be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 54 with exception fpr the proposed City Street and the proposed emergency access. •The proposed emergency access onto CSAH 54 at the north end is acceptable to Anoka County. Exact details will be determined during the Engineering Review process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, �·� Logan Keehr, PE Traffic Engineer II Our Passion Is Your Safe Way Home 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard N.W. .._ Andover, MN 55304-4005 Office: 763-324-3100 .._ Fax: 763-324-3020 ..i. www.anokacounty.us/highway Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer Attachment 8: Anoka County Letter dated December 3, 2024 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: December 11, 2024 REQUEST: Discussion, Adult Use Cannabis Regulations CASE NUMBER: N/A APPLICANT: City of Lino Lakes OWNER: N/A REVIEW SCHEDULE: N/A INTRODUCTION The City is considering adoption of requirements related to the regulation of Adult Use Cannabis as provided for under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. Staff will be providing an overview of the City’s regulatory authority and considerations for discussion. BACKGROUND Chapter 342 of Minnesota law was established by the State Legislature in 2023 and amended in 2024 providing for the cultivation, manufacture and sale of adult use cannabis. The State is currently completing the rulemaking process which will likely be completed after the first of the year (2025). The law created the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to oversee the implementation and regulation of the adult-use cannabis market, the medical cannabis market, and the consumer hemp industry. The OCM will be responsible for licensing Cannabis Businesses. There are 13 different types of business licenses. These include: Microbusiness Mezzobusiness Cultivator Manufacturer Retailer Wholesaler Transporter Testing Facility Event Organizer Delivery Service Medical Cannabis Combo Bus. Lower-Potency Hemp Manuf. Lower-Potency Hemp Retailer 2 Definitions for each business type are include in the attachments. ANALYSIS The law provides certain means of oversight by local units of government. However, the city cannot outright ban a cannabis business, or limit operations in a manner beyond those provided in state law. The City’s oversight includes: Retail Restrictions. The city may limit the number of retailers and businesses with retail endorsements allowed within the community provided there is at least one retail location per 12,500 residents. Lino Lakes is required to provide at least two licenses. The City Council plans to limit licenses to this number. Local Certification of Zoning Compliance. As part of the OCM licensing process the City must certify that the applicant has met compliance with local zoning ordinances. Retail Business Registration. Licensed Cannabis Retailers must register with the City through a formal registration process. Retail Business Hours of Operation. State law allows sales between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday. Sales are allowed on Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. City’s may choose to only allow for sales between 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. daily. Buffers. Cities may choose to prohibit the operation of a cannabis business in the following areas: • School – (0-1,000 feet) • Day care, residential treatment facility, or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors. (0-500 feet). City Code currently prohibits issuance of a liquor license for establishments within 1,000 feet of a school. It specifically excludes day cares from this requirement because children are under constant supervision while at the facility and when traveling to and from the facility. The retail restrictions, hours of operation, and buffers will be incorporated into the establishment of registration requirements within City Code. Planning and Zoning Board Discussion For purposes of the Zoning requirements the primary focus will be on the appropriate districts for each use. It is also necessary to determine whether the use is a permitted or conditional use based on similar uses already established in the districts. 3 The licensed uses fall within the following categories: Cultivation. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for cultivation would be permitted as an agricultural use and would be permitted indoor and outdoor in the R – Rural district. Indoor cultivation would also be considered in Industrial districts. Cannabis Manufacturer. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for cannabis manufacturer would be a permitted manufacturing use in the Light Industrial and General Industrial districts. Consideration should be given to whether this would be a permitted or conditional use in the Business Campus district. Hemp Manufacturer. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for low-potency hemp edible manufacturers permitted as a manufacturing use in the industrial districts. Wholesale. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for wholesale would be permitted as a wholesale sales use in the Light and General Industrial Districts and the Business Campus districts. Cannabis Retail. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for cannabis retail are permitted as retail sales in the Neighborhood Business, Limited Business, and General Business, Light Industrial, General Industrial and Business Campus districts. Cannabis Transportation and Cannabis Delivery. Cannabis business licensed or endorsed for Transportation and Deliver would be permitted as warehousing uses in the Light and General Industrial Districts and the Business Campus District. Timeline Staff is working with the City Attorney, City Clerk, and Public Safety Department to draft the necessary code amendments. We anticipate City Council consideration of the registration requirements in January of 2025. Staff is tentatively planning for consideration of zoning amendments by the Planning and Zoning Board, including public hearing in January. The City Council would consider any proposed zoning amendment in February of 2025. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. Staff is requesting feedback on the proposed uses and applicable zoning districts based on the information above and attached zoning district table. ATTACHMENTS 1. Cannabis Business Definitions 2. Land Use Consideration Table 3. Zoning District Table draft. CANNABIS BUSINESSES DEFINITIONS: A. Cannabis Business. A cannabis microbusiness, cannabis mezzobusiness, cannabis cultivator, cannabis manufacturer, dispensary, cannabis wholesaler, cannabis transporter, cannabis testing facility, cannabis delivery services, or medical cannabis combination business licensed, or any use otherwise authorized, under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. B. Cannabis Cultivation. A cannabis business licensed for planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of cannabis plants, cannabis flower, hemp plants, or hemp plant parts by a business licensed or authorized to cultivate cannabis or medical cannabis pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter,342. C. Cannabis delivery service. A person or entity licensed or otherwise authorized to purchase cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, and hemp-derived consumer products from licensed cannabis microbusinesses with a retail endorsement, cannabis mezzobusinesses with a retail endorsement, dispensaries, medical cannabis dispensaries, and medical cannabis combination businesses; transport and deliver cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, and hemp-derived consumable products to customers; and perform other actions pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. D. Cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible manufacturing. An entity licensed or otherwise authorized for the creation of cannabis concentrate and manufacture of cannabis products and hemp-derived consumer products for public consumption pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342, an entity licensed or authorized to purchase hemp and artificially derived cannabinoids to make hemp concentrate; manufacture artificially derived cannabinoids and hemp edibles for public consumption; package and label lower- potency hemp edibles for sale to customers; sell hemp concentrate, artificially derived cannabinoids, and lower-potency hemp edibles to other cannabis businesses and hemp businesses; and perform other actions pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342, or an entity in possession of a medical cannabis processor license pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. E. Cannabis mezzobusiness. A person or entity licensed to cultivate, manufacture, and sell products containing cannabis and related supplies and products and perform other actions authorized under a cannabis mezzobusiness license pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. F. Cannabis microbusiness. A person or entity licensed to cultivate, manufacture, and sell products containing cannabis and related supplies and products and perform other actions authorized under a cannabis microbusiness license pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. G. Cannabis Retail Business. A state licensed retail location and the retail location(s) of a mezzobusinesses with a retail operations endorsement, microbusinesses with a retail operations endorsement, medical combination businesses operating a retail location, excluding lower-potency hemp edible retailers, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. H. Cannabis Retailer. Any person, partnership, firm, corporation, or association, foreign or domestic, selling cannabis product to a consumer and not for the purpose of resale in any form. I. Cannabis testing facility. A facility licensed to obtain and test immature cannabis plants and seedlings, cannabis flower, cannabis products, hemp plant parts, hemp concentrate, artificially derived cannabinoids, lower-potency hemp edibles, and hemp-derived consumer products from cannabis microbusinesses, cannabis mezzobusinesses, cannabis cultivators, cannabis manufacturers, cannabis wholesalers, lower-potency hemp edible manufacturers, medical cannabis cultivators, medical cannabis processors, medical cannabis combination businesses, and industrial hemp growers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. J. Cannabis transporter. An entity licensed or otherwise authorized to transport immature cannabis plants and seedlings, cannabis flower, cannabis products, artificially derived cannabinoids, hemp plant parts, hemp concentrate, lower-potency hemp edibles, and hemp-derived consumer products from a cannabis business to a cannabis business pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. K. Cannabis wholesaler. An entity licensed or authorized to obtain, store, and sell or otherwise transfer cannabis or hemp seeds, plants, flower, or other products for the purpose of resale or other transfer to a cannabis business, but not to consumers, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. L. Lower-potency hemp edible retailer. A person or entity licensed or authorized to acquire, possess, transfer, sell, dispense, or distribute lower-potency hemp edible products and related supplies and products pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. M. Medical cannabis combination business. An entity authorized to cultivate, manufacture, and sell cannabis, hemp, and cannabis and hemp related supplies and products, and perform other actions authorized under a medical cannabis combination license pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342. Page 16 Zoning and Land Use (cont.) Table 1: Cannabis and Hemp Business Activities Endorsed Activity License Type Eligible to Do Endorsed Activity Description of Activity Comparable Districts Municipal Considerations Cultivation • Cultivator • Mezzobusiness • Microbusiness • Medical Cannabis • Combination “Cultivation” means any activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of cannabis plants, cannabis flower, hemp plants, or hemp plant parts. Indoor: Industrial, Commercial, Production Outdoor: Agricultural • Odor • Potential need for transportation from facility • Waste, water, and energy usage • Security Cannabis Manufacturing, Processing, Extraction • Manufacturer • Mezzobusiness • Medical Cannabis • Combination This group of endorsed activities turn raw, dried cannabis and cannabis parts into other types of cannabis products, e.g. edibles or topicals. Indoor: Industrial, Commercial, Production • Odor • Potential need for transportation from facility • Waste, water, and energy usage • Security Hemp Manufacturing • Lower-Potency Hemp Edible (LPHE) Manufacturing These businesses convert hemp into LPHE edible products. Indoor: Industrial, Commercial, Production • Odor • Waste, water, and energy Wholesale • Wholesale • Cultivator • Manufacturer • Mezzobusiness • Microbusiness • Medical Cannabis • Combination This activity and license type allows a business to purchase from a business growing or manufacturing cannabis or cannabis products and sell to a cannabis business engaged in retail. Indoor: Industrial, Commercial, Production • Need for transportation from facility • Security Page 17 Zoning and Land Use (cont.) Table 1: Cannabis and Hemp Business Activities (continued) Endorsed Activity License Type Eligible to Do Endorsed Activity Description of Activity Comparable Districts Municipal Considerations Cannabis Retail • Retailer • Mezzobusiness • Microbusiness • Medical Cannabis • Combination This endorsed activity and license type allow a business to sell cannabis products directly to consumers. Indoor: Retail, Neighborhood Shopping Districts, Light Industrial, Existing districts where off-sale liquor or tobacco sales are allowed. • Micros may offer onsite consumption, similar to breweries. • Micros and Mezzos may include multiple activities: cultivation, manufacture, and/or retail. Transportation • Cannabis Transporter This license type allows a company to transport products from one license type to another. - • Fleet based businesses that will own multiple vehicles, but not necessarily hold a substantial amount of cannabis or cannabis products. Delivery • Cannabis Delivery This license type allows for transportation to the end consumer. - • Fleet based business that will own multiple vehicles, but not necessarily hold a substantial amount of cannabis or cannabis products. Events • Event Organizer This license entitles license holder to organize a temporary event lasting no more than four days. Anywhere that the city permits events to occur, subject to other restrictions related to cannabis use. • On site consumption. • Retail sales by a licensed or endorsed retail business possible. Rural Commercial District Industrial Districts Notes Cannabis License Type R, Rural NB, Neighborhood Business LB, Limited Business GB, General Business LI, Light Industrial GI, Gen Industrial BC, Business Campus Cannabis Microbusiness C C C indoor cultivation of plants up to 5,000 sq ft or ½ acre outdoors + 1 retail license (same site). Staff proposing (indoor only) Cannabis Mezzobusiness P P P Indoor cultivation of plants up to 15,000 sq ft or up to 1 acre outdoors + 3 retail license (retail use is not on same site) (staff indoor only) Cannabis Cultivator (indoor) P P P P Indoor cultivation of up to 30,000 sq ft plant canopy Cannabis Cultivator (outdoor) P Outdoor cultivation limited to 2 acres Cannabis Manufacturer P P P Manufacture cannabis and hemp products Cannabis Retailer P P P C C C Cannabis retailer (342.27 stipulates display, storage, hrs operation; security) Cannabis Wholesaler P P P BUY and sell immature plants Cannabis Transporter P P P Transport cannabis and hemp products between Cannabis Testing Facility P P P Third-party testing any products grown or manufactured Cannabis Delivery Service C C C Delivery with on-site vehicles Medical Cannabis Cultivator P P P 60,000 sq ft of plant canopy Medical Cannabis Processor P P P Manufacture medical cannabis products Medical Cannabis Retailer P P P Purchase medical cannabis flower and products and sell or distribute Medical Cannabis Combo Business C C C Cultivator, processor, and retailer Lower-potency Hemp Edible Manufacturer P P P Lower-potency Hemp Edible Retail P P P