The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-09-2024 Council Meeting Agenda Packet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Updated 12/6/24 Monday, December 9, 2024 Broadcast on Cable TV Channel 16 and northmetrotv.com/lino-lakes-stream City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz Interim City Administrator: Dave Pecchia CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (Not televised) | No Public Comment allowed per the Rules of Decorum 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 3. City Administrator and Finance Director Hiring Update 4. Review Regular Agenda 5. Adjournment CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M. Council Chambers | Televised  Call to Order and Roll Call  Pledge of Allegiance  Public Comment Sign-in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum  Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 1. CONSENT AGENDA A. Consider Approval of Expenditures for December 9, 2024 (Check No. 121843 through 121897) in the Amount of $361,506.82 B. Consider Hiring Part-Time Rookery Activity Center Staff C. Consider Resolution No. 24-159, Approving Payment No. 2 (Final), Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Water Service Project, Diane Hankee D. Consider Resolution No. 24-162, Establishing Polling and Absentee Voting Locations for the 2025 Election Council Agenda -2- E. Consider Resolution No. 24-163, Approving Payment No. 1 (Final), 2024 Surface Water Management Project City Hall, Diane Hankee F. Consider Approval of Aug. 12, 2024 Council Work Session Minutes G. Consider Approval of Aug. 12, 2024 Council Meeting Minutes H. Consider Approval of Aug. 12, 2024 Special Budget Work Session Minutes I. Consider Approval of Nov. 21, 2024 Special Joint Work Session w/Committees J. Consider Approval of Nov. 25, 2024 Work Session Minutes K. Consider Approval of Nov. 25, 2024 Closed Meeting Minutes L. Consider Approval of Dec. 2, 2024 Work Session Minutes M. Consider Approval of Dec. 2, 2024 Closed Meeting Minutes N. Consider Approval of Nov. 25, 2024 Council Meeting Minutes O. Consider Approval of Resolution 24-172 Authorizing the Issuance of a Special Event Permit: Centerville Lions Club, Annual Ice Fishing Contest (2/15/25) P. Consider Resolution No. 24-165 Accepting the Allocation of Fire State Aid for the Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT A. Public Hearing – 2025 Budget and Tax Levy, Hannah Lynch i. Consider Resolution No. 24-168, Adopting the 2025 Final Budget and Levy B. Public Hearing – 2025-2029 Financial Plan, Hannah Lynch i. Consider Resolution No. 24-169, Accepting the 2025-2029 Financial Plan C. Consider Resolution No.24-170, Committing General Fund Balance, Hannah Lynch 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT No Report 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT No Report 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT No Report 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT A. Spargur Estates, Katie Larsen i. Consider Resolution No. 24-156 Approving Variances ii. Consider Resolution No. 24-157 Approving Preliminary Plat Council Agenda -3- B. Consider Resolution No. 24-160, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project, Diane Hankee C. Consider Resolution No. 24-161, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project, Diane Hankee D. Consider Resolution No. 24-164, Approving Memorandum of Understanding with Vadnais Lakes Water Management Organization and the North Oaks Company, Wilkinson Lake Water Quality Feasibility Study, Tom Hoffman E. Consider Resolution No. 24-166, Approving Distribution of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for North Oaks Mixed Use Development, Tom Hoffman F. Consider Resolution No. 24-167, Approving Professional Services Agreement with WSB, Winter Wetland Bank Application, Michael Grochala G. Consider Resolution No. 24-171, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Construction Contract, Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project, Diane Hankee 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS No Report 8. NEW BUSINESS No Report 9. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Community Calendar: A Look Ahead i. Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, December 11, 2024 at 6:30 PM ii. The City Council Work Session and Regular Meetings for December 23rd have been cancelled. iii. City Council Work Session, January 6, 2025 at 6 PM in the Community Room ADJOURNMENT + Expenditures December 9, 2024 Check #121843 to #121897 $361,506.82 Electronic Funds Transfer MN Statute 471.38 Subd. 3 Council Meeting December 9, 2024 Transfer In/(Out) 12/2/2024 Anoka County Tax Settlement 7,072,872.03 12/2/2024 Transfer to FRB Money Market (9,500,000.00) 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Hiring Part-Time Rookery Activity Center Staff VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The Council is being asked to approve the hiring of part-time Rookery Activity Center staff. BACKGROUND The recruiting process has identified candidates who will be a great addition to the staff at the Rookery. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council approve the hiring of the part-time Rookery Activity Center staff listed below: First Name Last Name Position Maxwell Rome Child Watch Attendant Anaeya Lucas Child Watch Attendant Corrin Hammer Child Watch Attendant Emerson Jennings Child Watch Attendant Start dates vary based on position and training schedule. ATTACHMENTS None CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE, City Engineer MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-159, Approving Payment No. 2 (Final), Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting council consideration to finalize the Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation Project. BACKGROUND On May 13, 2024 the City Council accepted quotes for the Hodgson Road and County Road J, Streetscape Improvements including the installation of plantings and an irrigation line within the roundabout. This in conformance with The City’s Gateway Design for the CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CR J (Ash Street) intersection. The low quote was awarded to Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design of Centerville, Minnesota, in the amount of $38,144.31. During the project additional landscaping was included to create a maintenance surface around the center landscaping in the amount of $5,162.66. The overall contract amount is $43,306.97. The project is funded through State Aid funds and the City of Shoreview cost share. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 24-159, Approving Payment No. 2 (Final), Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation Project in the amount of $5,650.14 to Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 24-159 2. Pay Request No. 2 (Final) – Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-159 APPROVING PAYMENT NO. 2 AND FINAL FOR HODGSON ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD J ROUNDABOUT LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PROJECT WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, the City Council passed resolution 24-51, awarding the contract for the Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation Project to Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design in the amount of $38,144.31; and WHEREAS, the cost for adding a maintenance surface resulted in Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5,162.66; and WHEREAS, a complete summary of costs are detailed in Payment No. 2 (Final) where the final amount of the Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Water Service Project was $43,306.97; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes that Payment Request No. 2 (Final) is approved for a final payment amount of $5,650.14 for the Hodgson Road and County Road J Roundabout Landscaping and Irrigation Project to Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Roberta Colotti, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Resolution 24-162 Establishing Polling and Absentee Voting Locations for the 2025 Election VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Minnesota Statute 204 B.16, subd. 1 requires the governing body of each municipality to designate by ordinance or resolution polling places for each election precinct each year no later than December 31st. Furthermore, the responsible authority and location for absentee voting is to be established by the city and the county. BACKGROUND The City of Lino Lakes Charter, Chapter 4 “Nominations and Elections”, Section 4.01 “The Regular Municipal Election”, calls for a regular municipal election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd numbered year commencing in 1983 at such places as the City Council shall designate. The 2025 Municipal Election will be held on Tuesday, November 4th. The City of Lino Lakes has seven precincts. The City Council can combine polling locations or authorize use of all seven sites. In the last municipal election 1,785 people voted. This is substantially less then the number of voters in the 2024 General Election, which was 14,135. Lino Lakes has three School Districts. Centennial Independent School District 12 and White Bear Lake School District 624 have shared that they do not plan to hold a bond referendum in 2025. Forest Lake School District 831 will be considering the renewal of an existing operating levy at their January 2025 Board Meeting. Speaking with the County historically there has been 10% to 20% voter turnout for a school board special election. School District 831 includes 2,600 of our registered voters. So, in the event they hold a bond referendum we could expect 260 to 520 voters, of which a percentage would be already accounted for in our estimate based on 2023 turnout for the municipal election. 2 Absentee voting begins 46 days prior to each election. This takes significant staff time, expense and resources. Anoka County provided in-person and mail absentee voting services in 2024, and the City provided an additional in-person site at City Hall. Given the limited turnout in 2023, it is recommended that Anoka County be designated exclusively as the absentee polling location for 2025. The City website will continue to link voters to the absentee ballot application and information in 2025, with the County mailing requested ballots. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 24-162 Establishing Polling and Absentee Voting Locations for the 2025 Election. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 24-162 2023 Municipal Election Roster Name Registered Voter Count Ballots Cast LINO LAKES P-1 1,984 234 LINO LAKES P-2 2,189 229 LINO LAKES P-3 1,567 222 LINO LAKES P-4 2,447 288 LINO LAKES P-5 1,581 234 LINO LAKES P-6 2,653 261 LINO LAKES P-7 2,414 317 Total 14,835 1,785 Precinct Total 2024 General Election Regis @ 7 am Total Persons Voting LINO LAKES P1 2,258 2,085 LINO LAKES P2 2,199 2,057 LINO LAKES P3 1,579 1,458 LINO LAKES P4 2,489 2,235 LINO LAKES P5 1,689 1,592 LINO LAKES P6 2,671 2,448 LINO LAKES P7 2,437 2,260 15,322 14,135 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-162 ESTABLISHING POLLING AND ABSENTEE VOTING LOCATIONS FOR THE 2025 ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 204 B.16, subd. 1 requires the governing body of each municipality to designate by ordinance or resolution polling places for each election precinct each year no later than December 31st; and WHEREAS, the polling places designated by resolution in December of each year are the polling places to be used for elections in the following calendar year; and WHEREAS, the City is to establish the responsible authority and location for absentee voting for the 2025 election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes that the following polling locations are designated for use in calendar year 2025: • Precinct #1 – Lino Lakes Senior Center, 1189 Main Street • Precinct #2 – Lino Lakes Fire Station #1, 7741 Lake Drive • Precinct #3 – St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street • Precinct #4 - City Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway • Precinct #5 – Rice Creek Covenant Church, 125 Ash Street • Precinct #6 – Lino Lakes Fire Station #2, 1710 Birch Street • Precinct #7 – Living Water Lutheran Church, 865 Birch Street BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Anoka County is designated as the responsible authority for absentee voting with the Anoka County Government Center, located at 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303, designated as the mail and in-person absentee voting location for the City of Lino Lakes in 2025. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC City Clerk CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE, City Engineer MEETING DATE: October 14, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-163, Approving Payment No. 1 (Final), 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting council consideration to finalize the 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project located behind City Hall. BACKGROUND On October 14, 2024, the City Council passed resolution 24-137, awarding the contract for the 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall to Dimke Excavating of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, in the amount of $47,790.55. Construction of the project began in November of 2024. The total contract amount is $56,002.05 which over the original estimate due to additional restoration and erosion control. The project is now complete and is recommended for final payment. Funding for the project is through the Surface Water Utility fund. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 24-163, Approving Payment No. 1 and Final, 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall in the amount of $56,002.05 to Dimke Excavating, LLC. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 24-163 2. Pay Request No. 1 & Final – 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-163 APPROVING PAYMENT NO. 1 AND FINAL FOR THE 2024 SURFACE WATER MAINTENANCE PROJECT AT CITY HALL WHEREAS, on October 14, 2024, the City Council passed resolution 24-137, awarding the contract for the 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall to Dimke Excavating of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, in the amount of $47,790.55; and WHEREAS, a complete summary of costs are detailed in Payment No. 1 (Final) where the final amount of the 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall was $56,002.05 which over the original estimate due to additional restoration and erosion control; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes that Payment Request No. 1 (Final) is approved for a final payment amount of $56,002.05 for the 2024 Surface Water Maintenance Project City Hall to Dimke Excavating, LLC. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Roberta Colotti, City Clerk Page 1 of 2 Lino Lakes City Council Work Session Minutes DATE: August 12, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:00 P.M. TIME ENDED: 6:23 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton, HR & Communications Manager Meg Sawyer, Deputy Director/Fire Dan L’Allier, City Engineer Diane Hanke and Community Development Director Michael Grochala 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items The agenda was adopted as presented. 3. Review Regular Agenda Councilmember Ruhland stated that in relation to Item 3A Resolution Regarding Legal Validity of Initiative and Charter Amendment Petitions, that the proposed request to seek the Attorney General’s review of the City Attorney’s opinion be struck from the resolution. He stated that he does not believe the City Attorney’s opinion will be overturned. The City Administrator stated that when the resolution is presented at the Regular Meeting that the procedural steps for the motion would be to adopt the resolution with the amendment as proposed. Mayor Rafferty noted that the City Attorney would be available at the Regular Meeting to answer any questions regarding the option of forwarding the matter to the Attorney General. The HR & Communications Manager reviewed the staff report regarding the request to appoint a Building Permit Technician. She stated that the recommended candidate is the current Office Specialist. The Deputy Director/Fire provided an overview of the proposed promotion of a Paid On- Call Fire Lieutenant at Station #1. Page 2 of 2 The Mayor asked for clarification on the firefighter equipment purchase of new helmets as outlined in the budget. The Deputy Director/Fire reviewed the advantages of the proposed equipment over other options. He reviewed the meaning of the color coding in relation to training levels and rank on the scene of an incident. The City Engineer provided an overview of the 2024 Woods Edge Street Scape Rejuvenation Project, scheduled for formal action this evening. She stated that the City received two quotes for the project and both contractors are qualified to complete the project. As a result, staff is recommending awarding the project to the company providing the low quote. The City Engineer stated that the property owners at 904 Kelly Street would like to build a pool. She reported that there is a drainage and utility easement restricting their ability to construct the pool. Upon review the easements can be vacated. This evening the Council is being asked to provide first reading to an ordinance vacating the drainage and utility easement. The City Engineer provided an overview of Item 6B Approval of Payment No. 4 and Final, 2022 Surface Water Maintenance Project. The City Engineer stated the City Council is being asked to approve the quote for the 2024 Rejuvenator Project this evening. She highlighted that additional contractors were eligible to provide a quote for service with this most recent process. 4. Adjournment Mayor Rafferty adjourned meeting at 6:23 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DATE: August 12, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:30 PM TIME ENDED: 7:01 PM LOCATION: City Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, City Engineer Diane Hankee, Public Works Superintendent Justin Williams, HR & Communications Manager Meg Sawyer, Deputy Director/Fire Dan L’Allier, Public Safety Director John Swenson, and City Attorney Jay Squires. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rafferty at 6:30 PM. Mayor Rafferty provided an overview of the Rules of Decorum and provided first warning regarding enforcement of the rules. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Rafferty stated that before opening the public comment period, he wanted to state that the City is in receipt of a complaint regarding an email response sent by a Council member. The statements made do not reflect or represent the views of the City Council as a whole. He stated that the City Council takes the complaint seriously and is reviewing the matter in accordance with the City Council Code of Conduct. Mayor Rafferty opened the public comment period at 6:34 p.m. Jameel Ahmed, 12142 Bataan Street NE. Blaine, stated that regarding the email identified by the Mayor, he requests that the Council demand the immediate resignation of the Councilmember that sent the email. He requested that the Council issue a public apology to the Muslim community, CAIR-MN and Zikar Holdings. He stated that it's about the future of our community, a future that every resident, regardless of race, religion or background feels safe, respected and valued. He stated that we cannot allow hate to fester in our community, nor can we ignore when it rears its ugly head from a position of power. He concluded by submitted documents for the public record. Randy Rennaker, 379 Carl Street, stated that he represented the committee submitting the three petitions. He recognized that this evening the City Council is scheduled to adopt a resolution regarding the legal validity of the proposed Initiative and Charter amendments. He requested that if determined to not meet the legal validity standards, that they not be forward to the Attorney General, as drafted in the proposed resolution. He requested instead that the City Council provide advice to the committee and community on what options are available and how they can assist in planning the northwest quadrant. Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 2 of 6 The City Administrator announced that concludes the list of people present at this time, who requested to speak at public comment. Motion to close the public comment period at 6:40 p.m. Councilmember Lyden requested a moment to provide a response to CAIR’s letter and the discussion regarding the email. He stated that to clarify matters, no amount of tactics, intimidation or bullying will taint this Council's work. He reiterated that he has no ill will against Muslims or any other religion or race. He stated that as he said before Martin Luther King, said it best people should be judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. He stated that his concern is with an organization, the organization of the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR), period. Councilmember Lyden referenced a US News article dated February 11, 2024 regarding CAIR. He stated that the article is long, but it reads like this, a controversial Muslim civil rights advocacy organization experienced a major blow to its reputation last week after the Florida House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution to denounce the Council of American Islamic Relations, introduced by Senator Randy Fine. The Senator encourages all state and local government agencies in Florida to suspend contact and outreach activities with CAIR, citing the group's extensive history of terror connections and anti-Jewish bigotry. It has been stated that seven CAIR officials have been arrested, convicted and deported for related actions. Councilmember Lyden stated what is important to understand here is that the turmoil and unrest that CAIR subjected Lino Lakes to, can happen to any community across the State of Minnesota. SETTING THE AGENDA The Agenda was adopted as presented. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Items #1A, 1C through 1F as presented. 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 3 of 6 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 3A, Resolution No. 24-107, Legal Validity of Initiative and Charter Amendment Petitions. The City Attorney provided an overview of his opinion, stating that the Initiative and Charter Amendment Petitions were discussed at the July 22nd meeting and the Council requested at that time that a resolution be drafted reflecting his opinion that they did not meet the legal validity requirements for formal action. At that time the option of forwarding the matter to the Attorney General was presented as an option for a second opinion. Tonight, there has been discussion about removing that section from the resolution and if there is interest in removing that section, the motion would be to adopt the resolution, striking Item #4. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-107, Legal Validity of Initiative and Charter Amendment Petitions, striking Item #4 related to the State Attorney General Opinion. 3B, Appointment of Building Permit Technician Motion to approve the appointment of Dana Rozan to the Building Permit Technician position within the Community Development Department, at step 1 of the wage scale. 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT 4A, Promotion of Paid-On Call District Chief Firefighter Motion to appoint Vincent Kasprowicz for the Paid On-Call Fire Lieutenant position at Fire Station #1, as presented. RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 4 of 6 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 5A, Resolution 24-108, 2024 Woods Edge Street Scape Rejuvenation Project Motion to adopt Resolution 24-108, Accepting Quotes, 2024 Woods Edge Streetscape Rejuvenation Project 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 6A, Public Hearing – Vacating Drainage & Utility Easement, 904 Kelly Street The City stated that the property owners at 904 Kelly Street are requesting the vacation of a drainage and utility easement to install a pool on their property. The easement was dedicated to the City over the Great River Energy power line easement. The City does not allow for structures (i.e. pools) to be constructed within easements. They have an encroachment agreement with Great River Energy, and they also have coordinated setbacks of the pool from the power lines. With that the vacation of the drainage and utility easement is recommended for approval. Motion to open the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. No public comments were presented. Motion to close the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. First Reading of Ordinance No. 12-24 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation (904 Kelly Street, Lot 11, Block 3, Pine Glen 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota) RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 5 of 6 Motion to dispense with the full reading of Ordinance No. 12-24 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation (904 Kelly Street, Lot 11, Block 3, Pine Glen 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota) Motion to provide first reading of Ordinance No. 12-24 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation (904 Kelly Street, Lot 11, Block 3, Pine Glen 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota) 6B, Resolution No. 24-104 – Payment No 4 and Final, 2022 Surface Water Maintenance Project Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-104, Approving Payment No. 4 and Final, 2022 Surface Water Maintenance Project. 6C, Resolution No. 24-105 Accepting Quotes, 2024 Rejuvenator Project Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 24-105 Accepting Quotes, 2024 Rejuvenator Project. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 6 of 6 8. NEW BUSINESS None 9. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS Community Calendar: A Look Ahead a. 2024 State Primary Election, Tuesday, August 13th from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., polling location information is available on the City website. b. Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, August 14th at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Rafferty adjourned the meeting at 7:01 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. _________________________ _________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor Page 1 of 4 Lino Lakes City Council Special Work Session Minutes DATE: August 12, 2024 TIME STARTED: 7:11 P.M. TIME ENDED: 8:43 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton, Finance Director Hannah Lynch, HR & Communications Manager Meg Sawyer, Deputy Director/Fire Dan L’Allier, City Engineer Diane Hanke, and Community Development Director Michael Grochala 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items The agenda was adopted as presented. The Finance Director provided a review of the presentation schedule for this evening. 3. 2025 Annual Budget and 2025-2029 Financial Plan The Finance Director stated that a 2025 Annual Budget and 2025-2029 Financial Plan are being provided for the City Council’s review this evening. The drafts were prepared by department directors and reviewed by the City Administrator with the intention of providing the resources needed to continue city services at their current levels. The 2025 Annual Budget includes a total tax levy of $15,906,535 which represents a $1,785,607 or 12.65% increase. With a smaller increase in tax capacity values, the city tax rate is proposed to increase from 36.098% in 2024 to 39.857% in 2025. Detail behind the total tax levy increase can be found in the draft 2025 Annual Budget. The 2025-2029 Financial Plan was prepared in compliance to and in accordance with the Lino Lakes City Charter Section 7.05. The Transmittal Letter, included in the report, gives a full overview of the Plan. The Financial Section focuses on all city funds, while the Capital Improvement Program (including Appendix A and B) focuses on the capital project and enterprise funds. The Project Detail in Appendix A appears as follows: 1. Project Type 2. Project Year 3. Project Name The Plan has two Capital Improvement Programs: Citywide and Community Development. Citywide capital expenditures are reviewed during the annual budget Page 2 of 4 process and approved when the plan is accepted by the City Council. Community Development projects are brought to the City Council as projects occur and may go through the competitive bidding process. General Fund Total 2025 base budget adjustments amount to $741,441 as detailed in the draft 2025 Annual Budget. The base budget increase of $218,051 is the result of existing personnel wages and benefits which include the following assumptions for 2025: • Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) • 7.50% estimated increase in health insurance premiums (employer’s share) • 2.00% estimated increase in dental insurance premiums (employer’s share) • 6.00% estimated increase in workers compensation insurance premiums • Wage & benefit assumptions for vacant positions Non-property tax general fund revenues decreased $16,462 which increases the need for tax levy dollars. The decrease can primarily be attributed to the decrease in building permits and plan inspections fees, partially offset by increases in state aid, interest on investments, and refunds & reimbursements. The transfer in of $20,000 from the Cable TV & Communications Fund has been discontinued. The transfer previously supported the cost of the Communications Specialist position within the Administration Department. Rookery Activity Center The Rookery Activity Center tax levy is not proposed to increase, although the proposed 2025 budget includes a $99,123 deficit. The Rookery Activity Center began operations in Spring 2022 and completed its first full fiscal year in 2023. The 2024 budget included a $500,000 tax levy which brought tax levy support for recreation funding back to pre- pandemic levels. Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic and the opening of the Rookery, the tax levy supported the YMCA facility and recreation programming at roughly $490,000 annually. Capital Equipment Replacement In line with 2024-2028 Financial Plan, a $210,000 increase in the Capital Equipment Replacement Levy is proposed for 2025, for a total levy of $810,000. Citywide capital expenditures proposed to be funded with the levy in 2025 are included in the 2025- 2029 Financial Plan. The levy increase continues to facilitate transitioning away from Certificates of Indebtedness and towards a Pay-As-You-Go approach to capital equipment financing. The impact of that levy can be seen on the Projected Cash Balance statement for the Page 3 of 4 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund presented within the draft 2025-2029 Financial Plan. Capital Fire Water Tender Replacement In September 2022, the Council approved a contract with Custom Fire for the purchase of two water tenders at a total cost of $2,262,000. The funding was provided through an interfund loan to be paid back with a tax levy over 10 years. In December 2023, Public Safety Aid in the amount of $229,294 was used to buy down the interfund loan and decrease the annual payment/tax levy. The levy commenced in 2024 and will go through taxes payable 2033. Street Maintenance The Street Maintenance Levy has increased $148,500 or 15.00%. The $1,138,500 levy will be used in combination with $120,000 from the Water Fund to complete a street preservation project in line with the City’s Pavement Management Plan. The 2023 Pavement Management Plan recommended increased funding to maintain a target street condition rating of 73. Historical street maintenance funding is as follows: • $661,500 in 2020 (5.00% annual increase) • $711,113 in 2021 (7.50% annual increase) • $782,224 in 2022 (10.00% annual increase) • $860,446 in 2023 (10.00% annual increase) • $990,000 in 2024 (15.00% annual increase) A decline in the street condition rating is predicted in future years with an increase less than 15.00%. Debt Levy The significant change to the debt levy is the addition for the 2024 Street Reconstruction of Colonial Woods and Pine Haven. Bonds are anticipated to be sold in late 2024 for construction in 2025. The Finance Director stated that Council action is requested by the September 23rd meeting in order to set the preliminary tax levy and schedule a public hearing date. The preliminary levy set at the September meeting may not be increased thereafter but may be lowered before approving the final budget and levy in December. Council Discussion The City Council reviewed the draft 2025 Preliminary Budget and 2025-2029 Financial Plan. They provided direction to the Finance Director regarding the proposed budget for inclusion in future discussions and to prepare for the September 23rd Preliminary Budget and Levy Adoption. Page 4 of 4 4. Adjournment Mayor Rafferty adjourned meeting at 8:43 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor Page 1 of 2 Lino Lakes City Council Special Work Session Minutes DATE: November 21, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:02 P.M. TIME ENDED: 7:36 P.M. LOCATION: Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Dave Pecchia, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, City Planner Katie Larsen, Environmental Coordinator Tom Hoffman and City Clerk Roberta Colotti. Consultants Attending: Kimley Horn Representatives, Brian Adams and Leila Bunge. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items The agenda was adopted as presented. 3. Main Street Corridor Master Plan and AUAR Mayor Rafferty welcomed the City committee members who were present this evening representing the Planning & Zoning Board, Park & Recreation Board, Economic Development Advisory Committee, and Environmental Board. The Community Development Director introduced Brian Adams and Leila Bunge, consultants with Kimley Horn. He stated that Kimley Horn was retained by the City to lead the Main Street Corridor Master Plan and Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process. The planning area is defined by Sunset Avenue on the west, 4th Avenue to the east, Pine Street on the north, and Century Trail/Carl Street on the south. The area encompasses approximately 980 acres. He reviewed the regional planning requirements of the Metropolitan Council for the City of Lino Lakes. Brian Adams and Leila Bunge reviewed the planning process and provided background information. They facilitated a question-and-answer period with the Council and City Committee representatives. The discussion was focused on development, land use, and design alternatives. The information gathered will be incorporated into the Mapping Northwest Main planning materials. Page 2 of 2 The Community Development Director announced that the next step is a Community Meeting. This will be held on December 4, 2024 from 6-8 p.m. at the Rookery and the public is encouraged to attend. 4. Adjournment Mayor Rafferty adjourned meeting at 7:36 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor Page 1 of 3 Lino Lakes City Council Work Session Minutes DATE: November 25, 2024 TIME STARTED: 5:30 P.M. | Recessed: 6:34 P.M. and Reconvened 7:23 P.M. TIME ENDED: 7:50 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty (arrived 6:27 P.M.), Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Dave Pecchia, HR & Communications Manager Meg Sawyer, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, and Police Captain Willaim Owens. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Acting Mayor Stoesz called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items The agenda was adopted as presented. 3. Closed Session Acting Mayor Stoesz stated that pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) Attorney-Client Privilege, the meeting will be closed to discuss the Zikar Holdings LLC vs. City of Lino Lakes lawsuit. Motion to close the meeting at 5:32 p.m. pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) Attorney-Client Privilege, the meeting will be closed to discuss the Zikar Holdings LLC vs. City of Lino Lakes lawsuit. Mayor Rafferty arrived at 6:27 p.m. Mayor Rafferty announced that the closed meeting was concluded and re-opened the Work Session. RESULT: CARRIED [4-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None ABSENT: Rafferty Roll Call Vote Page 2 of 3 4. Recess and Reconvene Mayor Rafferty announced that there was a Regular Council meeting scheduled for 6:30 p.m. this evening and requested a motion to recess the Work Session until immediately following the Regular Meeting. Motion to recess the Work Session at 6:34 p.m., until immediately following the Regular City Council meeting this evening. Mayor Rafferty reconvened the Work Session meeting at 7:23 p.m. All members of the Council were present. 5. Update and Discussion on City Administrator Position The HR & Communications Manager provided an overview of the City Administrator search process. She provided an overview of the current City Administrator vacancies in Minnesota and the Midwest area. She reviewed the estimated cost to hire an executive search firm. The Interim City Administrator stated that he has been speaking with area professionals and given the competitive market, he anticipates that the recruitment process will be difficult. He stated that with the current slate of projects for the incoming City Administrator a person with significant experience is recommended. He recommended contracting with a search firm given the limited candidate pool and competitive hiring market. Council Consensus It was the consensus of the City Council to move forward with using an executive search firm to facilitate the hiring of the next City Administrator. The HR & Communications Manager summarized that the next steps are to contact executive search firms for price quotes, contact the individual identified by the Mayor that may have a list of possible candidates, and conduct an updated market study for the salary range of the City Administrator position. The Interim City Administrator stated that three executive search firms would be contacted and provided with the details needed about the process in order to provide a quote. The selected search firm will be provided with any names generated by the individual identified by the Mayor. RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Cavegn SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Page 3 of 3 The Council discussed the hiring process for the Public Safety Department in 2025. They considered the Citygate study as it relates to the hiring timeline. The Interim City Administrator reported that Citygate has begun the employee interview/information gathering process and SWAT analysis as part of their study. He anticipated that a rough draft of the report would be available in the next few weeks. 6. Adjournment Motion to Adjourn at 7:50 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Page 1 of 1 Lino Lakes City Council Closed Meeting Minutes DATE: November 25, 2024 TIME STARTED: 5:32 P.M. TIME ENDED: 6:33 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Present: City Administrator Dave Pecchia, City Clerk Roberta Colotti, and Community Development Director Michael Grochala. Also Attending: Attorney’s John Baker and Kate Swenson 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. 2. Closed Session – Attorney-Client Privilege Mayor Rafferty reviewed that Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) Attorney-Client Privilege, the meeting has been closed to discuss the Zikar Holdings, LLC vs. City of Lino Lakes lawsuit. The City Council discussed the lawsuit with the assigned attorneys and LMCIT representatives. 3. Adjournment Motion to return to Open Session at 6:33 p.m. Mayor Rafferty adjourned the meeting at 6:33 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Cavegn SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote Page 1 of 6 Lino Lakes City Council Work Session Minutes DATE: December 2, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:00 P.M. TIME ENDED: 9:49 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Dave Pecchia, City Clerk Roberta Colotti, Deputy Public Safety Director Kyle Leibel, Police Captain William Owens, Deputy Director/Fire Dan L’Allier, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, City Planner Katie Larson, and Public Services Director Rick DeGardner. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items The agenda was adopted as presented. 3. Spargur Estates Variances and Preliminary Plat The City Planner provided an overview of the Spargur Estates application which will be presented for formal action on December 9th. She stated that the applicant, Mespargur Inc. submitted a land use application for variances and preliminary plant for Spargur Estates. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into three single family lots for the purpose of constructing two new single family detached dwellings. The Council reviewed the requested setback and area utilities. The City Planner confirmed that the 2024 rate for park dedication fees would be applied to this property as they completed the Preliminary Plat in 2024. Council Consensus The City Council was in support of the project as presented. 4. Lyngblomsten PUD Concept Plan #2 The City Planner stated that Lyngblomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan #2. They are requesting an amendment to the PUD Development Stage Plan and PUD Final Plan to change the planned 2-story skilled nursing home to a three-story building. The property address is 6070 Blanchard Blvd. This is a concept plan review only. If the Planning & Zoning Board Page 2 of 6 and City Council support the proposed amendment, the applicant will formally submit an amendment to the PUD Plan. The City Planner stated that this project will have the same number of units, a smaller footprint with three vs. two levels, and increased parking. The applicant was present to speak to the proposed project modification. The applicant reviewed the State of MN requirements related to skilled nursing homes. The interest in creating a better view for residents with the modification to a three-story building and the comparison to the existing building which is three stories. They stated that they expect to hire 150-175 employees with this project. With Nursing Assistants as the main job category, with a pay range of $22-$24 per hour, and Nurses as the second largest job category, at an approximate pay rate of $40 per hour. They expect to begin construction in the fall of 2025 with a 10-month construction timeline. In response to the Council question regarding the commercial development project identified at this site, the representative stated that they have begun marketing the site to service orientated retail developers. They have been receiving a positive response to this effort. They anticipate construction in 2025. Councilmember Lyden stated that he was recently at the current Lyngblomsten building and the quality of the facility was commendable. Council Consensus The City Council was in support of the project as presented. 5. 2025 Municipal Election The Clerk presented information on the 2025 Municipal Election. She reported that there were 15,322 registered voters as of 7 a.m. on the day of the November 2024 General Election and a voter turnout of 14,135 voters for the General Election. For comparison the last municipal election, held in 2023, had a voter turnout of 1,785 voters. She reviewed the budgeted costs for the 2025 election. The City Clerk presented three items for the consideration of the City Council. The first being to move to even year elections, the second to combine polling locations for the 2025 municipal election, and the third to designate Anoka County as the site for absentee voting for 2025. It was noted that Anoka County provided all absentee mailed ballot processing in 2024 and provided in-person absentee voting that was replicated at City Hall in 2024. There would be no additional cost to designating Anoka County as the single site in 2025 for absentee voting. Page 3 of 6 Council Consensus • It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to research the legal steps and considerations to move to an even year election for municipal officers, for future consideration of the Charter Commission and/or City Council as appropriate. • It was the consensus of the Council to designate all seven polling locations that were used in 2024 for the 2025 Municipal Election and to designate Anoka County as the absentee voting site for 2025. The City Clerk stated that the research question regarding odd/even year elections would be brought back at a future meeting once completed. The resolution setting the polling and absentee voting locations would be brought back for formal action at the December 9, 2024 meeting, as there is as December 31st deadline designating polling locations. 6. 2025 State Licensing of Cannabis Sales and Associated City Registration Regulations Police Captain Owens reported that the State of Minnesota, Office of Cannabis Management is working on rules to begin licensing business under several different categories after January 1, 2025, when the new state licensing laws go in to affect. The City of Lino Lakes will be asked to register the businesses under the state licensing rules. The City can adopt an ordinance further regulating the businesses but must allow for a minimum number of businesses under state law. The minimum is one per 12,500 people. So, Lino Lakes would be required to allow two businesses at this time. There is also a County minimum which the City could cross-reference in any adopted ordinance. Captain Owens asked if the Council was interested in drafting an ordinance to further regulate business operations. Specific regulations for the consideration of the Council include limiting the number of businesses, creating buffer zones between the businesses and other uses (i.e. schools), and hours of operation. He suggested modeling the license requirements after the current liquor licensing regulations adopted by the City. He noted that there are sample ordinances and information from the State and League of Minnesota Cities that can be used in drafting an ordinance. He confirmed that the City can charge a fee for the registration. The Community Development Director stated that the timeline for drafting an ordinance would include presenting the land use ordinance amendments to the Planning & Zoning Board. It is anticipated that a draft could be prepared for consideration in January with final approval by the end of the first quarter. Council Consensus It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to draft an ordinance regulating cannabis sales and setting a fee for license registration for consideration by the City Council at a future meeting. Page 4 of 6 7. Response to 11/12/24 City Council Meeting, Public Comment Regarding Panhandling Police Captain Owens provided background information related to the November 12, 2024 Council Meeting, public comment period, request to adopt an ordinance limiting panhandling to areas set away from daycares and schools. He stated that panhandling is a legal activity and can not be prohibited by ordinance. However, the person that is panhandling cannot have disorderly conduct, impede traffic and must leave when asked if panhandling on private property. He stated that the site that was identified at public comment, Birch & Hodgson has had 20 police calls since November 3rd and before that there were two calls in the last two years. He stated that other than that site, there is one other site that has had a couple of calls. He noted that the person that is panhandling at Birch & Hodgson is not disorderly, does not impede traffic and is not on private property. So, while they have offered resource information to the individual, he is not breaking any laws. Captain Owens shared the City of Woodbury information regarding panhandling, posted on their website. The website identifies that panhandling is a legal activity and asks residents to contribute to local resource centers to best help people. He said that a further option would be to install signs regarding panhandling and directing readers to contribute to local resource centers. He stated that although there are examples of other cities that have signs, that is not immediately recommended for Lino Lakes. Council Consensus It was the consensus of the City Council to monitor the calls for service and direct the Public Safety Department to report back, if call numbers remain high after 30-days. 8. 3rd Quarter Public Safety Update Deputy Public Safety Director Leibel provided the 3rd Quarter Public Safety Update. The police and fire divisions reviewed future reporting changes that will impact the titles and data sources for future reports, noting that may impact the comparison of calls for service and other numbers. Police Captain Owens reviewed the details of the police department calls for service by type. He reviewed response times. He reviewed current and projected staffing levels and the hiring process. Deputy Public Safety Director/Fire Dan L’Allier reviewed the fire department total number of calls for 3rd Quarter-24 and YTD. He reviewed the number of medical calls. He presented response times. He provided an overview of the duty crew responsibilities. The Council discussed the ambulance service in the area and regulations for operating an ambulance service. Page 5 of 6 The Mayor discussed the current study by Citygate and their use of the numbers, noting that accuracy of the numbers will be important for that study. Councilmember Ruhland requested additional future report details such as a breakdown of the average response times by fire station and a percent change column on the police department Group A & B crimes report. He also requested a report on the prosecution conviction rate compared to submitted felony cases, from past years (i.e. 2022). Police Captain Owens cautioned that when reviewing a report of conviction rates that the Lino Lakes public safety department works to ensure a strong case before submitting, however, once submitted, felony cases are then outside their control as far as decisions/convictions by the court system. Deputy Public Safety Director Leibel highlighted the many community events the department participated in during the 3rd Quarter. Deputy Public Safety Director Leibel reviewed the status of the fleet and requested to swap vehicle #315 with #302 on the replacement schedule. He stated that there would be not impact on the budget with this change. Council Consensus It was the consensus authorize exchanging public safety vehicle #315 with #302 on the replacement schedule, as requested. 9. Public Works Facility Project – Design Review Committee Mayor Rafferty asked the Council’s interest in establishing a Design Review Committee for the Public Works Facility project. He stated that the purpose of the committee would be to review and report back to the full Council on the project. Also, to work with the selected architect to review design samples, etc. Council Consensus It was the consensus of the City Council to create a Design Review Committee for the Public Works Facility project and to appoint Mayor Rafferty and Council Member Ruhland to the committee. 10. Future Meeting Schedule The City Clerk reported that staff was surveyed regarding pending matters for the December 23rd Council Meeting and January 6th Work Session and there were items that required reviewed in January but that the second meeting in December could be cancelled without impacting any projects. Council Consensus It was the consensus of the City Council to cancel the regularly scheduled, December 23, 2024 Work Session (6 PM) and Regular Meeting (6:30 PM). Page 6 of 6 11. Notices and Communications Councilmember Stoesz reported that North Metro TV has not held any further discussion on the proposed merger with another cable consortium. Councilmember Ruhland reported that Anoka County has invited him to serve on the 2025 Board of Appeals. 12. Closed Session Mayor Rafferty stated that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c)(3), the meeting will be closed to discuss offers for the purchase of real property by the City Council, the property is located at 7473 24th Avenue. Motion to close the meeting at 9:15 p.m. pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(c)(3), to discuss offers for the purchase of real property by the City Council, the property is located at 7473 24th Avenue. Mayor Rafferty reconvened the Work Session at 9:48 p.m. The Community Development Director provided a re-cap of the Closed Meeting. He reported that the Council provided direction on the proposed offer for the purchase of 7473 24th Avenue and that formal action is anticipated to be taken at a regular meeting in January 2025. 13. Adjournment Mayor Rafferty adjourned meeting at 9:49 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Cavegn SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote Page 1 of 1 Lino Lakes City Council Closed Meeting Minutes DATE: December 2, 2024 TIME STARTED: 9:15 P.M. TIME ENDED: 9:48 P.M. LOCATION: Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz and Ruhland MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Present: City Administrator David Pecchia, City Clerk Roberta Colotti, and Community Development Director Michael Grochala. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Rafferty called the meeting to order at 9:15 p.m. 2. Closed Session – Land Purchase Mayor Rafferty reviewed that Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 13D.05, Subdivision 3(c)(3), the meeting was closed to discuss offers for the purchase of real property, located at 7473 24th Avenue. The City Council reviewed the offers/counteroffers to date and provided direction to the Community Development Director regarding the City’s offer for the purchase of property. 3. Adjournment Motion to return to Open Session at 8:48 p.m. Mayor Rafferty adjourned the meeting at 8:48 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. ___________________________ ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES DATE: November 25, 2024 TIME STARTED: 6:40 PM TIME ENDED: 7:17 PM LOCATION: City Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz MEMBERS ABSENT: None Staff Members Present: City Administrator Dave Pecchia, Community Development Director Michael Grochala, City Engineer Diane Hankee, City Planner Katie Larsen, HR & Communications Manager Meg Sawyer, and Police Captain William Owens. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rafferty at 6:40 p.m. Mayor Rafferty provided an overview of the Rules of Decorum. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Rafferty opened the public comment period at 6:43 p.m. Sam Bennett, 6841 Lakeview Drive, Lino Lakes, requested that a multi-use path be constructed along the roadway if it is realigned. He stated that it is difficult to get to the existing trails and suggested adding a bike path to connect amenities. He stated that park dedication fees should include trail development and noted that the current fees seem low. He suggested that the four area communities of Columbus, Lexington, Circle Pines and Lino Lakes, work together on the multi-use bike path system. Chris Stowe, 426 Pine Street, Lino Lakes, reviewed his presentations to the Rice Creek Watershed, regarding the 10-22-32 pipe. He outlined his concerns with the drainage and proposed solutions. He expressed his concerns with the Watershed and City procedures in responding to this matter. He submitted a written report to accompany his comments. Motion to close the public comment period at 6:50 p.m. SETTING THE AGENDA The Agenda was adopted as presented. RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 2 of 7 1. CONSENT AGENDA Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Items #1A through 1Q as presented. 2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT None 3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 3A, 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with LELS Local No 260 Motion to approve the 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with LELS Local No 260 as presented. 3B, 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with LELS Local No 299 Motion to approve the 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with LELS Local No 299 as presented. 3C, 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with I.U.O.E. Local No. 49 Motion to approve the 2025-2026 Labor Agreement with I.U.O.E. Local No. 49 as presented. RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 3 of 7 3D, 2025-2026 Non-Union Compensation Plan Motion to approve the 2025-2026 Non-Union Compensation Plan as presented. 3E, Appointment of Activity Center Coordinator Motion to approve the appointment of Calvin Joustra to the full-time Activity Center Coordinator (Membership) position at the Rookery Activity Center at step 6 of the wage scale for the position. 4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT No Report 5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT No Report 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 6A, Vacating Drainage & Utility Easement, 1057 Black Duck Court Motion to dispense with the full reading of Ordinance No. 15-24 RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 4 of 7 Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 15-24 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation (1057 Black Duck Ct, Lot 14, Block 2, Black Duck Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-152, Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 15-24 6B, Lino Retail 2.0 Motion to dispense with the full reading of Ordinance No. 17-24 Motion to adopt Ordinance No. of Ordinance No. 17-24 Approving Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment (Rezoning) from NB, Neighborhood Business to GB, General Business RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Stoesz Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Cavegn SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Stoesz AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-155 Approving Summary Publication of Ordiannce No. 17-24 6C, Vacating a Portion of 77th Street Motion to dispense with the full reading of Ordinance No. 14-24 Motion to provide second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 14-24 Vacating a Portion of 77th Street (Between Marilyn Drive and CSAH 23 (Lake Drive), Anoka County, Minnesota.) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-151, Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 14-24 RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Cavegn SECONDER: Lyden AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Roll Call Vote RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Lyden SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7 6D, Resolution No. 24-153 – Utility Repair Project Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-153, Awarding Quote for the Utility Repair Project 6E, Resolution No. 24-158 – Colonial Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment Motion to adopt Resolution No. 24-158, Approving Colonial Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None 9. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Rafferty welcomed Interim City Administrator Dave Pecchia, stating that he had served for 17 years in the public safety department and previously as Interim City Administrator. Community Calendar: A Look Ahead i. Environmental Board Meeting, November 26th at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. Please note that this is a date change from November 27th. ii. City Council Work Session, December 2nd at 6 p.m. at City Hall. iii. Park Board Meeting, December 4th at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. iv. Mapping Northwest Main, Community Meeting #1, December 4th at 6 p.m. at the Rookery, 7690 Village Drive in Lino Lakes. RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Ruhland SECONDER: Cavegn AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None RESULT: CARRIED [5-0] MOVER: Stoesz SECONDER: Ruhland AYES: Rafferty, Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz NAYS: None Lino Lakes City Council Minutes Page 7 of 7 v. Economic Development Advisory Committee Meeting, December 5th at 8 a.m. at City Hall. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Rafferty adjourned the meeting at 7:17 p.m. These minutes were approved at the regular Council Meeting on December 9, 2024. _________________________ _________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC Rob Rafferty, City Clerk Mayor CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1O STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Approval of Resolution 24-172 Authorizing the Issuance of a Special Event Permit: Centerville Lions Club, Annual Ice Fishing Contest (2/15/25) VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority INTRODUCTION The Centerville Lions host an annual Ice Fishing contest on Centerville Lake each winter. The contestants, volunteers, and observers enter and exit the lake via access which lies within the City of Lino Lakes; thus, permits are required. BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to host the annual contest on February 15, 2025. Set-up is scheduled for the day before. Lions Club members and other community volunteers will be on hand to assist with clean-up. Food and beverages will be available for purchase and the Lions Club will be responsible for securing a Temporary Food and Beverage Establishment License issued by Anoka County to allow serving of food. The following applications are being presented for the consideration of the City Council: - City of Lino Lakes, Special Event Permit Application - State of Minnesota, Temporary On-Sale Liquor License Application / City Approval - State of Minnesota, Exempt Gambling Permit (Raffle) / City Approval The Centerville Lions Club has successfully hosted this event over the past several years and it is recommended that their applications be approved as presented. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 24-172 Authorizing the Issuance of a Special Event Permit: Centerville Lions Club, Annual Ice Fishing Contest (2/15/25) ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 24-172 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-172 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT: CENTERVILLE LIONS CLUB, ANNUAL ICE FISHING CONTEST (2/15/25) WHERAS, the Centerville Lions Club has applied for a Special Event Permit, a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, and an Exempt Gambling Permit for the club’s annual fishing contest on Centerville Lake; and, WHERAS, the event plan includes ice fishing, service of food and beverages, and a raffle on February 15, 2025; and, WHEREAS, the required applications for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License and Exempt Gambling Permit have been submitted by the Centerville Lions Club for the ice fishing contest on February 15, 2025; and, WHEREAS, the club will be responsible for securing any necessary permits from Anoka County, including the water use permit and the temporary food establishment license; and, WHEREAS, the permit applications and plan for the event will be required to be in compliance with city code and regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, that the City Council authorizes issuance of a Special Event Permit and approval of a Temporary Liquor License and Exempt Gambling Permit for the Centerville Lions Club for their Annual Ice Fishing Contest on Centerville Lake on February 15, 2025. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024 Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: Roberta Colotti, CMC City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 1P STAFF ORIGINATOR: Meg Sawyer, Human Resources and Communications Manager MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-165, Accepting the Allocation of Fire State Aid for the Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The City Council is being asked to consider Resolution 24-165, authorizing the City to accept the allocation of Fire State Aid to cover employee contributions to the PERA Police and Fire Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan. BACKGROUND Staff has reviewed recent legislative changes related to the Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan and the City’s ability to seek reimbursement for pension related costs to full-time personnel. The City of Lino Lakes Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan meets the requirements of a combined fire department as defined in Minn. Stat. § 477B.041. As a result, the governing body is eligible to allocate a portion of fire state aid for employer contributions to the PERA Police and Fire Plan. Statute governs the process of allocating fire state aid and the amount of fire state aid that may be allocated, and impacts fire state aid payable beginning in 2025. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-165. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 24-165 Aid Allocation Plan CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-165 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF FIRE STATE AID FOR THE STATEWIDE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER (SVF) PLAN WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes previously authorized the fire department to join the Voluntary Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Retirement Plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA); and WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes’ Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan meets the requirements of a combined fire department as defined in Minn. Stat. 477B.041. WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes highly values the contributions of City Fire Department members to the safety and well-being of our community and wishes to safeguard their pension investments in a prudent manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota: 1. The City hereby approves the terms of the aid allocation plan; and 2. The City Clerk and Mayor are hereby authorized to execute all documents necessary to effectuate the intent of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk Your Statewide Volunteer Firefighter (SVF) Plan meets the requirements of a combined fire department as defined in Minn. Stat. 477B.041. As a result, the governing body and fire department are eligible to share fire state aid. The provision is effec- tive for Fire State Aid estimated payable next October. To share state aid, law requires that you have an allocation plan. You may use this completed form as your allocation plan. After it is complete, return it to PERA. STATEWIDE VOLUNTARY FIREFIGHTER (SVF) PLAN ALLOCATION PLAN TEMPLATEPERA 1. Municipality: 2. Are you a combined department: r Yes r No STOP. If you answered NO, you are NOT eligible to share state aid. Number of Active Firefighters in Police & Fire Plan and SVF Plan as of December 31. 3. Distribution method of fire state aid: r Percent of Fire State Aid paid to City % r Dollar amount paid to City $ r Transfer formula selected: Specify Formula 4. Length of allocation plan: Start Date End Date 5. Date allocation plan approved by governing body: 6. Notice given to SVF Firefighters: r Yes. Date delivered to SVF Firefighters r Provide a copy of notice to PERA 7. Signature of municipal clerk or secretary: Name (please print) Signature Title Or mail to: PERA, ATTN: SVF 60 Empire Drive, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55103-2088 A closer look at your numbers:Here’s how we arrived at the amount of state aid you have to share. The law requires the maximum amount of state aid that may be shared is the lessor of these three calculations: 1. Employer contributions for firefighters paid proceeding calendar year .............................. 2. Amount of Fire State Aid estimated due October 1 .......................................................... 3. Fire State Aid plus Supplemental Aid less Financial Requirement ..................................... See the email for the explanation of what each of these terms mean. RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO: Email: PERASVF@mnpera.org X 2 22 X Employer Contributions for firefighters paid proceeding calendar year. 1/1/2025 12/31/2027 12/9/24 X 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Public Hearing - 2025 Budget and Tax Levy i. Consider Resolution No. 24-168, Adopting the 2025 Final Budget and Levy VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Minnesota Statutes require the City of Lino Lakes to hold a public hearing and adopt and certify a final property tax levy for taxes payable in the following year on or before five working days after December 20th. The 2025 final levy of $15,591,090 represents a $1,470,162 or 10.41% increase over the 2024 levy. With the net tax capacity value increasing only 1.53%, the tax rate is anticipated to increase to 39.065% from 36.098%. BACKGROUND The City Council discussed the 2025 budget and levy at multiple work sessions: • August 12, 2024 • August 26, 2024 • September 9, 2024 • November 4, 2024 The proposed 2025 final levy maintains essential services and programs while the city continues to experience rising costs in the current inflationary environment. Highlights of the levy increase from the 2024 levy are depicted in the following graph. 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 24-168, Adopting the 2025 Final Budget and Levy. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-168 2. 2025 Annual Budget – Final Adoption General Fund software and equipment, professional and contracted services, and insurance premiums 29% General Fund wages and benefits 34% Rookery Activity Center7% Capital equipment replacement 14% Park and trail improvements 6% Street maintenance and reconstruction 10% 2025 Final Levy Increase CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-168 ADOPTING THE 2025 FINAL BUDGET AND LEVY WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has developed a 2025 budget and resulting tax levy for taxes payable 2025; and WHEREAS, after holding budget work sessions, the City Council adopted a 2025 preliminary levy on September 23, 2024, and certified such levy to the County Auditor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has continued to meet and refine the 2025 budget and levy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes require the final adopted levy be certified to the County Auditor on or before five working days after December 20. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that a 2025 budget for the following funds be adopted as presented: Fund Revenues Expenditures General Fund $14,050,323 $14,050,323 Rookery Activity Center $1,932,569 $1,861,747 Water Fund $3,069,832 $3,069,832 Sewer Fund $3,845,752 $3,845,752 Storm Water Fund $554,540 $512,098 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $15,591,090 be levied and spread for taxes payable 2025. The amount levied is for the following purposes: Operating Levy $ 14,308,879 Debt Levy G.O. Bond 2015A 269,864 EDA Lease Revenue Bond 2015 318,557 G.O. Bond 2018A 484,215 G.O. Bond 2021A 209,575 $1,282,211 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 2025 ANNUAL BUDGET Final Adoption – December 9, 2024 MINNESOTA 1 Adopted Adopted $ % 2024 2025 Change Change Tax Levy Operating Levy 12,833,204 14,308,879 1,475,675 11.50% Debt Levy 1,287,724 1,282,211 (5,513) -0.43% Total Tax Levy 14,120,928 15,591,090 1,470,162 10.41% General Fund Budget Revenues Property Taxes 10,429,606 11,349,814 920,208 8.82% Other Taxes 185,000 155,000 (30,000) -16.22% Business Licenses and Permits 72,225 80,748 8,523 11.80% Non-Business Licenses and Permits 1,025,190 892,961 (132,229) -12.90% Intergovernmental 692,622 921,804 229,182 33.09% Charges for Services 456,325 450,996 (5,329) -1.17% Fines and Forfeits 76,000 76,000 - 0.00% Investment Earnings 30,000 75,000 45,000 150.00% Miscellaneous 32,000 48,000 16,000 50.00% Use of Reserves 150,000 - (150,000)0.00% Transfer From Other Funds 20,000 - (20,000) -100.00% Total Revenues 13,168,968 14,050,323 881,355 6.69% Expenditures Administration 1,766,798 1,896,895 130,097 7.36% Community Development 923,264 1,000,359 77,095 8.35% Public Safety 6,693,725 7,245,187 551,462 8.24% Public Services 3,555,934 3,832,882 276,948 7.79% Other 229,247 75,000 (154,247) -67.28% Total Expenditures 13,168,968 14,050,323 881,355 6.69% Tax Rate 36.098% 39.065% CITY OF LINO LAKES 2024-2025 BUDGET SUMMARY 2 Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted 2022 2023 2024 2025 $ Change % ChangeOperating Levy Fund General Fund 101 8,748,619 9,694,085 10,394,606 11,323,814 929,208 8.94% Rookery Activity Center 202 - 325,000 500,000 600,000 100,000 20.00% Blue Heron Days 205 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 - 0.00% Capital Equipment Replacement 402 150,000 325,000 600,000 810,000 210,000 35.00% Capital Fire Water Tender Replacement 402 - - 223,598 221,565 (2,033) (0.91%) Office Equipment Replacement 403 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - 0.00% Street Maintenance 421 782,224 860,446 990,000 1,138,500 148,500 15.00% Park and Trail Improvements 425 75,000 90,000 90,000 180,000 90,000 100.00% Total Operating Levy 9,790,843 11,319,531 12,833,204 14,308,879 1,475,675 11.50% Debt Levy Final Levy Year Purpose Certificate of Indebtedness 2019 2022 Police/Fleet Capital Equipment 139,493 - - - - 0.00%Certificate of Indebtedness 2020 2023 Police/Fleet Capital Equipment 106,042 106,299 - - - 0.00% G.O. Bond 2012A (1)2023 Main St/Lake Dr & Birch St/Ware Rd Traffic Signals/Refund 2003A Series Bonds (Elm Street, Twilight Acres Water Main, Century Farm Lift Station)178,794 176,109 - - - 0.00% G.O. Bond 2015A (1)2030 Shenandoah Area Street Reconstruction Improv 216,497 223,532 219,857 216,182 (3,675) (1.67%) G.O. Bond 2015A - Abatement Portion 2026 Birch Street Sanitary Sewer Ext & Turn Lanes 51,372 50,427 54,732 53,682 (1,050) (1.92%)EDA Lease/Revenue Bond 2015 2035 Fire Station #2 316,300 320,815 319,765 318,557 (1,208) (0.38%) G.O. Tax Abatement Refunding Bond 2016C 2022 City's Participation in YMCA Project 325,054 - - - - 0.00% G.O Bond 2018A 2033 West Shadow Lake Dr & LaMotte Area Street Reconstruction Improv/Lake Dr Watermain/Trl 485,212 485,737 485,475 484,215 (1,260) (0.26%) G.O Bond 2021A 2031 4th Ave, Joyer Ln, Karth Rd, Talle Ln, Canfield Rd, and Gaage Ln Street Reconstruction Improv 209,680 211,465 207,895 209,575 1,680 0.81% G.O. Bond 2025A 2040 Colonial Woods and Pine Haven Street Reconstruction Improv - - - - - 0.00% Total Debt Levy 2,028,444 1,574,384 1,287,724 1,282,211 (5,513) (0.43%) Total Levy 11,819,287 12,893,915 14,120,928 15,591,090 1,470,162 10.41% (1) Levy result of Voter-Approved Referendum CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED TAX LEVY 2024-2025 3 Actual Actual Adopted Actual Adopted 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 Taxable Market Value 2,587,650,762 3,287,882,335 3,544,111,404 3,539,171,941 3,581,879,847 * Annual % Change 6.26% 27.06% 7.79% 7.64% 1.21% Actual Actual Adopted Actual Adopted 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 Total Tax Capacity Value 27,908,349 35,452,015 38,860,006 38,846,166 39,533,445 * Less FD Contribution in Value (1,643,524) (1,502,577) (1,820,393) (1,820,393) (2,342,867) Less Captured Value for Tax Increment (783,140) (1,041,739) (1,399,316) (1,399,596) (1,017,937) * Total Net Tax Capacity Value 25,481,685 32,907,699 35,640,297 35,626,177 36,172,641 Annual % Change 5.70% 29.14% 8.30% 8.26% 1.53% Total Levy 11,819,287 12,893,915 14,120,928 14,120,928 15,591,090 Less FD Distribution (1,587,612) (1,384,776) (1,260,837) (1,260,837) (1,460,414) Total Net Levy for Tax Rate 10,231,675 11,509,139 12,860,091 12,860,091 14,130,676 Annual % Change 5.81% 12.49% 11.74% 11.74% 9.88% City Tax Capacity Rate 40.154%34.974%36.084%36.098%39.065% *Anoka County payable 2025 proposed values as of 11/13/2024. Final values are subject to change. CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED TAX CAPACITY RATE 4 September Base Adjustments $% Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Increase/Increase/ 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Decrease Decrease Property Taxes 8,759,777 9,666,211 10,429,606 5,479,482 10,429,606 920,208 11,349,814 920,208 8.82% Other Taxes 152,971 147,131 185,000 84,300 185,000 (30,000) 155,000 (30,000) (16.22%) Special Assessments 0 1,185 0 287 0 0 0 0 *** Business Licenses and Permits 28,894 72,610 72,225 76,724 72,225 8,523 80,748 8,523 11.80% Non-Business Licenses and Permits 1,247,111 901,042 1,025,190 678,495 1,025,190 (132,229) 892,961 (132,229) (12.90%) Intergovernmental 700,740 908,267 692,622 749,490 692,622 229,182 921,804 229,182 33.09% Charges for Services 479,721 442,560 456,325 374,505 456,325 (5,329) 450,996 (5,329) (1.17%) Fines and Forfeits 61,141 85,400 76,000 73,467 76,000 0 76,000 0 0.00% Investment Earnings (163,143) 307,403 30,000 240,200 30,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 150.00% Miscellaneous 55,049 50,285 32,000 17,096 32,000 16,000 48,000 16,000 50.00% Other Financing Sources 40,000 21,213 170,000 22,040 20,000 (20,000) 0 (170,000) (100.00%) TOTAL REVENUES 11,362,261 12,603,307 13,168,968 7,796,087 13,018,968 1,031,355 14,050,323 881,355 6.69% CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 5 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail Property Taxes Current Taxes 101-000-3010-000 8,702,091 9,623,450 10,394,606 5,436,217 10,394,606 929,208 11,323,814 Levy for General Operations Delinquent Taxes 101-000-3020-000 31,359 19,968 30,000 39,286 30,000 (5,000) 25,000 Prior Year(s) Delinquencies Excess Tax Increments 101-000-3050-000 20,448 21,567 0 0 0 0 0 Tax Forfeits 101-000-3060-000 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 Penalties & Interest 101-000-3150-000 5,577 1,226 5,000 3,979 5,000 (4,000) 1,000 8,759,777 9,666,211 10,429,606 5,479,482 10,429,606 920,208 11,349,814 Other Taxes Lodging Tax 101-000-3225-000 72,907 79,581 85,000 51,107 85,000 0 85,000 Twin Cities Gateway Pass-Through Circle Pines Gas Franchise 101-000-3350-000 80,064 67,550 100,000 33,193 100,000 (30,000) 70,000 152,971 147,131 185,000 84,300 185,000 (30,000) 155,000 Special Assessments Current Assessments 101-000-3110-000 0 968 0 287 0 0 0 Delinquent Assessments 101-000-3120-000 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,185 0 287 0 0 0 Business Licenses and Permits Liquor License - Bar 101-000-3201-000 3,720 42,200 42,000 41,440 42,000 0 42,000 License to Sell Liquor for On-Premises Consumption Liquor License - Beer 101-000-3202-000 0 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 License to Sell Packaged Liquor for Off-Premises Consumption Off-Sale Liquor 101-000-3203-000 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,400 0 1,400 License to Sell Packaged Liquor for Off-Premises Consumption Sunday Liquor License 101-000-3204-000 190 1,800 1,800 2,000 1,800 0 1,800 License to Sell Liquor for On-Premises Consumption on Sunday Club Liquor License 101-000-3205-000 0 500 500 300 500 0 500 Beer Permit 101-000-3206-000 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investigation Fee 101-000-3208-000 1,223 3,779 3,000 3,675 3,000 500 3,500 Fee to Perform Background Investigation for License Applicants Garbage Removal License 101-000-3209-000 2,200 2,155 2,000 3,145 2,000 750 2,750 Annual License to Collect Refuse in the City Temporary Consumption Permit 101-000-3210-000 200 100 300 100 300 (100) 200 Tobacco License 101-000-3211-000 650 742 600 3,500 600 2,900 3,500 Annual License to Sell Tobacco in the City Cannabinoid License 101-000-3212-000 0 950 600 1,900 600 1,300 1,900 Contractor's License 101-000-3213-000 11,280 8,080 11,890 8,995 11,890 2,968 14,858 Rental Housing License 101-000-3215-000 5,991 8,329 5,900 5,851 5,900 205 6,105 Dance License 101-000-3219-000 105 35 35 35 35 0 35 Fireworks License 101-000-3220-000 200 200 200 100 200 0 200 Mobile Food Vendor Permit 101-000-3221-000 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 Massage License 101-000-3222-000 902 1,141 1,000 1,384 1,000 0 1,000 Peddlers License 101-000-3223-000 605 1,000 1,000 1,750 1,000 0 1,000 License for Door-to-Door Sales 28,894 72,610 72,225 76,724 72,225 8,523 80,748 Non-Business Licenses and Permits Building Permits 101-000-3250-000 628,685 448,045 588,135 354,480 588,135 (92,892) 495,243 Value-Based Fee-Covers the Cost of Inspec. & Code Compl. Plan Inspection Fees 101-000-3251-000 364,451 259,455 258,325 198,923 258,325 (34,155) 224,170 65% of Bldg Permit Fee to Cover Cost of Plan Review Erosion Control Permits 101-000-3252-000 22,720 18,880 32,000 13,920 32,000 (8,000) 24,000 Plumbing Permits 101-000-3253-000 49,994 30,554 33,710 28,630 33,710 (314) 33,396 Mechanical Permits 101-000-3254-000 105,910 85,327 69,195 45,856 69,195 1,609 70,804 Septic Plumbing Permit 101-000-3255-000 5,410 5,890 5,680 3,530 5,680 14 5,694 Septic System Permit 101-000-3256-000 7,750 6,500 7,100 4,750 7,100 (65) 7,035 Fence Permit 101-000-3259-000 7,590 6,624 5,000 5,467 5,000 189 5,189 Dog License 101-000-3260-000 967 720 1,000 627 1,000 0 1,000 Sign Permit 101-000-3262-000 1,145 1,085 1,025 50 1,025 (84) 941 Road Overweight Permit 101-000-3263-000 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 Underground Utility Permit 101-000-3264-000 36,161 32,462 18,020 18,270 18,020 1,469 19,489 Miscellaneous Permits 101-000-3266-000 16,328 5,350 6,000 3,993 6,000 0 6,000 1,247,111 901,042 1,025,190 678,495 1,025,190 (132,229) 892,961 Intergovernmental TZD Safe Roads Grant 101-000-3314-000 25,537 37,515 25,000 11,971 25,000 5,000 30,000 Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant Funding Other Federal Revenue 101-000-3319-000 0 0 0 21,496 0 0 0 Local Government Aid 101-000-3340-000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Market Value Homestead Credit 101-000-3341-000 6,556 3,788 3,500 0 3,500 0 3,500 Municipal State Aid 101-000-3345-000 276,074 266,516 275,000 294,114 275,000 20,000 295,000 For Maintenance of City-Designated State-Aid Roads Police State Aid 101-000-3346-000 258,907 299,203 260,000 341,688 260,000 40,000 300,000 Aid for Police Retirement Plan and POST Training Other State Revenue 101-000-3348-000 30,386 3,291 0 13,353 0 0 0 Fire State Aid 101-000-3349-000 21,703 169,000 21,705 0 21,705 158,295 180,000 PERA SVF Contribution of $139,631, Net Revenue $40,369 Other Fire Aid 101-000-3351-000 13,408 30,255 20,000 28,493 20,000 0 20,000 Fire Training/Ed Anoka County Solid Waste 101-000-3360-000 68,169 98,699 87,417 38,375 87,417 5,887 93,304 SCORE Grant for Recycling Efforts 700,740 908,267 692,622 749,490 692,622 229,182 921,804 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 6 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE Charges for Services Land Use Fee 101-000-3265-000 19,240 16,699 10,225 13,906 10,225 635 10,860 Sale of Supplies 101-000-3404-000 12 294 25 615 25 175 200 Incudes Data Request Searches & Retrieval of Responsive Data Fee Assessment Searches 101-000-3405-000 7,940 5,560 8,000 3,900 8,000 (3,500) 4,500 Election Filing Fees 101-000-3409-000 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 SAC/Surcharge Fee 101-000-3414-000 9,298 5,524 6,000 3,143 6,000 (2,000) 4,000 Aerial Map Fee 101-000-3417-000 23,670 4,410 20,000 9,540 20,000 (5,000) 15,000 Police Reports 101-000-3420-000 797 975 800 201 800 0 800 Police Other Revenues 101-000-3422-000 184,795 171,820 190,000 146,531 190,000 0 190,000 Public Works Fees 101-000-3433-000 4,902 11,299 8,000 2,833 8,000 0 8,000 Other Park Revenues 101-000-3470-000 6,399 5,787 5,000 5,171 5,000 0 5,000 Engineering/Planning Charges 101-000-3492-000 53,911 48,751 34,000 54,491 34,000 1,486 35,486 Investment Management Charge 101-000-3494-000 50,000 50,000 50,000 33,333 50,000 0 50,000 Building Rents 101-000-3640-000 200 125 200 25 200 0 200 Bldg Lease Revenue 101-000-3740-000 118,557 121,291 124,075 100,817 124,075 2,875 126,950 New Creations Child Care 479,721 442,560 456,325 374,505 456,325 (5,329) 450,996 Fines and Forfeits Fines & Forfeits 101-000-3510-000 61,041 84,800 75,000 72,867 75,000 0 75,000 Driving Diversion Program (DDP) 101-000-3512-000 100 600 1,000 600 1,000 0 1,000 61,141 85,400 76,000 73,467 76,000 0 76,000 Investment Earnings Interest on Investments 101-000-3620-000 (163,143) 163,200 30,000 114,073 30,000 45,000 75,000 2.00% Interest Rate Assumption Change in Fair Value of Investments101-000-3621-000 0 144,203 0 126,127 0 0 0 Included in Interest on Investments in 2022 (163,143) 307,403 30,000 240,200 30,000 45,000 75,000 Miscellaneous Donations 101-000-3720-000 200 1,000 0 55 0 0 0 Refunds & Reimbursements 101-000-3730-000 52,769 48,841 30,000 14,678 30,000 16,000 46,000 Purchasing Card Rebates, LMC Insurance Dividend, Peace Officer Benefit, Police Vest Reimbursement Cash Over/Short 101-000-3800-000 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 101-000-3810-000 2,080 442 2,000 2,364 2,000 0 2,000 55,049 50,285 32,000 17,096 32,000 16,000 48,000 Other Financing Sources Use of Fund Reserves 101-000-3900-000 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 Sale of Fixed Assets 101-000-3910-000 0 1,213 0 2,040 0 0 0 Transfer From Other Funds 101-000-3920-000 40,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 (20,000)0 40,000 21,213 170,000 22,040 20,000 (20,000)0 Total Revenues 11,362,261 12,603,307 13,168,968 7,796,087 13,018,968 1,031,355 14,050,323 7 DEPARTMENT ACCT # NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Mayor and Council 4300 Professional Services Conduct Community Survey 45,000$ Mayor and Council 4321 Telephone Councilmember cellular phones 3,000$ Mayor and Council 4343 Newsletter Newsletter Design and Printing - quantity increase 510$ Mayor and Council 4452 Subscriptions & Dues League of MN Cities (LMC) dues increase 980$ Administration 41XX Personal Services Eliminate vacant Deputy City Clerk position (89,683)$ Administration 4300 Professional Services Pre-Employment Assessments - increased recruitment activities and vendor cost increases 6,072$ Administration 4321 Telephone Staff cellular phones 895$ Administration 4410 Contracted Services CivicClerk Agenda and Meeting Mmgt. Software annual maint.5,035$ Administration 4410 Contracted Services BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - HR Module 6,955$ Administration 4410 Contracted Services CivicEngage website annual maintenance increase 1,515$ Administration 4452 Subscriptions & Dues Dropbox large file sharing subscription 700$ Elections 4340 Printing & Publishing Cost of publishing required election notices; cost of printing election ballots (municipal expense in odd years)1,900$ Elections 4410 Contracted Services Voting Equipment System per Anoka County Agreement covered by grant funds in 2025 (6,500)$ Charter 3900 Professional Services Charter Commission Directed Expenses increase per MN Statute 410.06 (0.07% of 2024 general property tax levy)1,060$ Finance 4308 Auditor Account for 2024 actuals and 2025 projected 9.00% fee increase 4,000$ Finance 4310 Other Consultants Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support 10.00% fee increase 25,000$ Finance 4310 Other Consultants BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - Financial Modules; increase from Springbrook annual maintenance 17,580$ Finance 4310 Other Consultants Remainder of Springbrook Annual Maintenance Contract 20,382$ Finance 4310 Other Consultants EasyCIP Annual Maintenance (previously funded through Office Equipment Replacement Fund) 4,862$ Finance 4340 Printing & Publishing Increase for required publications in Quad Community Press 400$ Finance 4342 Truth In Taxation City's share of Anoka County truth in taxation/proposed tax notices mailed in November each year. The cost increases with the number of new parcels each year. 200$ Finance 4345 Payment Processing Credit Card Processing Fees - decrease to reflect passing fees onto the customer (2,000)$ Finance 4410 Contracted Services Assessment contract with Anoka County. Increase to reflect increased number of parcels assessed. 3,000$ Legal 4301 Municipal Attorney Increased activity requiring the support of the city attorney 10,000$ Economic Development 4300 Professional Services Reclassify ACRED Contribution (1,500)$ Economic Development 4410 Contracted Services Reclassify ACRED Contribution 1,500$ Economic Development 4452 Subscriptions & Dues Increase in membership costs 225$ Planning 4410 Contracted Services Increase in Comp Plan Update set aside; 35E AUAR 5,000$ Planning 4410 Contracted Services BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - CD Module 1,660$ Engineering 4410 Engineering Consultant WSB Retainer increase 2,996$ Community Development 4321 Telephone Staff cellular phone 600$ Community Development 4330 Travel & Tuition Compass Peer Group 1,600$ Solid Waste 4330 Travel & Tuition Conference fee 80$ Solid Waste 4340 Printing and Publishing Reclassify costs to newsletter and contracted services (4,000)$ Solid Waste 4343 Newsletter Reclassify newsletter costs from Printing and Publishing 3,100$ Solid Waste 4410 Contracted Services Increased cost for monthly recycling day 3,040$ Forestry 4410 Contracted Services Increase in EAB Tree Replacement Program 25,000$ Police 4211 Maintenance Supplies Increase in the numbers of battery replacements for portable radios 800$ Police 4240 Small Tools Mandated emergency siren upgrades 12,000$ Police 4240 Small Tools Tasers 1,198$ Police 4300 Professional Services Mandated biennial video audit does not occur in 2025 (1,470)$ Police 4321 Telephone Change in cell phone vendor resulting in cost savings (760)$ Police 4322 Postage Decrease due to digital evidence sharing (500)$ Police 4360 Insurance Police liability insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the ranges of 5-9%. An 8% increase has been assumed. (375)$ Police 4370 Uniforms Upgrading police officer ballistic vests (7) from level 2 to level 3 9,300$ Police 4381 Electricity Increase in electricity cost for emergency sirens 80$ Police 4410 Contracted Services JLEC - RMS ($2,415), Virtra Annual Plan ($4,800), LEADS ($272), Lexipol ($474), Vector Solutions ($600), 3SI ($470), SWAT JPA ($4,500), Archive Social ($1,194), Health Strategies FIT ($60) 14,785$ 2025 BASE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES GENERAL FUND 8 DEPARTMENT ACCT # NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Police 4410 Contracted Services Vehicle Towing, Dekota County Detox Facility, Dakota County CJN (3,588)$ Fire 4321 Telephone Change in cell phone vendor resulting in cost savings (340)$ Fire 4330 Travel & Tuition Restoring training capacity to 2023 budgeted amount 10,000$ Fire 4370 Uniforms Replacement of expiring fire turn-out gear 24,400$ Fire 4410 Contracted Services Ground ladder annual testing ($640), SCBA annual testing ($20), ACFPC RMS ($223), Lexipol ($162), Vector Solutions ($800), air compressor & bottles annual service/testing ($350), Health Strategies FIT ($240), Archive Social ($1,194) 3,629$ Fire 4410 Contracted Services NFPA Inspection Requirements (1,170)$ Fire 4452 Subscriptions & Dues NFPA annual dues 175$ Building Inspections 4200 Office Supplies Reduction (200)$ Building Inspections 4300 Professional Services BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - CD Module 11,000$ Streets 4224 Patching Materials Increase in bituminous due to addition of Tailgate Paver in 2023 12,500$ Streets 4321 Telephone Increase to account for actual costs incurred 450$ Streets 4385 Street Lights New Light Pole at Sioux Ln and Hokah Dr ($9,000), Upgrade 10 Lighting Fixtures and Underground Conduit and Wiring on Fawn Ln ($55,000), Legacy Light Post Painting 114 Light Poles ($45,000) 109,000$ Fleet 4212 Fuels Decrease in the price of fuel (10,000)$ Fleet 4321 Telephone Increase to account for actual costs incurred 60$ Fleet 4363 Auto Insurance Auto insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-10%. A 5% increase has been assumed ($11,055). An additional assumption of three $1,000 deductibles ($3,000) has been added based on an historical average. 14,055$ Fleet 4410 Contracted Services Increase to account for actual costs of maintaining and repairing fire equipment 64,000$ Fleet 4452 Subscriptions & Dues Increase to account for Used Oil Class License Fee 100$ Govt Buildings 4240 Small Tools Portable Kaivak Machine (total cost $4,900) 2,500$ Govt Buildings 4361 Insurance General liability, property, and excess liability insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-9%. An 8% increase has been assumed. 8,655$ Govt Buildings 4382 Utilities Increase to account for actual costs incurred 4,000$ Govt Buildings 4410 Contracted Services Increase to account for actual costs incurred 7,000$ Govt Buildings 4410 Contracted Services S2 Door System Subscripton 3,840$ Parks 4240 Small Tools Battery Powered Tools ($1,000), Tool Cat Attachments - 74" Snowblower ($8,000) and 68" Angle Broom ($7,000) 16,000$ Parks 4382 Utilities Increase to account for actual costs incurred 8,000$ Other 4905 Contingency Unknown events or circumstances (4,247)$ Total 2025 Adjustments Requested 415,041$ Increase in General Fund Base Budget 476,682$ Decrease in Non-Property Tax General Fund Revenues 17,485$ Decrease in General Fund Transfers In 20,000$ Increase in Rookery Activity Center Levy 100,000$ Increase in Capital Equipment Levy 210,000$ Decrease in Capital Fire Water Tender Levy (2,033)$ Increase in Pavement Management Levy 148,500$ Increase in Park and Trail Improvements Levy 90,000$ Decrease in Existing Debt Levies (5,513)$ Total 2025 Tax Levy Increase 1,470,162$ 9 September Base Adjustments $% Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Increase/ Increase/ DEPT#DESCRIPTION 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Decrease Decrease ADMINISTRATION 401 MAYOR AND COUNCIL 106,237 97,952 109,274 68,862 109,085 49,490 158,575 49,301 45.12% 402 ADMINISTRATION 650,970 561,264 712,764 455,463 786,944 (68,511) 718,433 5,669 0.80% 403 ELECTIONS 36,374 15,383 49,000 37,963 25,967 (4,600) 21,367 (27,633) (56.39%) 405 CHARTER ADMINISTRATION 191 668 8,920 0 8,920 1,060 9,980 1,060 11.88% 407 FINANCE 621,219 667,663 748,840 591,835 767,116 73,424 840,540 91,700 12.25% 414 LEGAL CONSULTANTS 117,340 189,796 138,000 104,458 138,000 10,000 148,000 10,000 7.25% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 1,532,331 1,532,725 1,766,798 1,258,581 1,836,032 60,863 1,896,895 130,097 7.36% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 415 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 89,317 94,697 98,135 49,740 98,134 225 98,359 224 0.23% 416 PLANNING AND ZONING 130,356 146,769 181,529 111,681 188,416 6,660 195,076 13,547 7.46% 417 ENGINEERING 99,888 103,120 97,463 65,936 97,463 2,996 100,459 2,996 3.07% 418 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 187,960 204,692 308,682 159,960 326,045 2,200 328,245 19,563 6.34% 461 ENVIRONMENTAL 50,394 46,772 65,523 40,438 71,060 0 71,060 5,537 8.45% 462 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT 61,290 98,726 87,417 46,153 91,084 2,220 93,304 5,887 6.73% 463 FORESTRY 109,054 92,487 84,515 73,549 88,856 25,000 113,856 29,341 34.72% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 728,259 787,263 923,264 547,458 961,058 39,301 1,000,359 77,095 8.35% PUBLIC SAFETY 420 POLICE PROTECTION 4,460,383 4,581,552 5,062,622 3,521,175 5,341,878 31,470 5,373,348 310,726 6.14% 421 FIRE PROTECTION 848,628 1,029,456 1,094,025 798,581 1,270,201 36,694 1,306,895 212,870 19.46% 422 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 420,178 487,252 537,078 336,516 554,144 10,800 564,944 27,866 5.19% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 5,729,189 6,098,260 6,693,725 4,656,273 7,166,223 78,964 7,245,187 551,462 8.24% PUBLIC SERVICES 430 STREETS 1,021,982 939,447 1,146,013 794,323 1,162,127 121,950 1,284,077 138,064 12.05% 431 FLEET MANAGEMENT 724,128 778,513 704,061 607,148 722,512 68,215 790,727 86,666 12.31% 432 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 580,010 578,975 624,081 451,770 628,751 25,995 654,746 30,665 4.91% 450 PARKS 740,757 924,207 1,081,779 729,534 1,079,332 24,000 1,103,332 21,553 1.99% 451 RECREATION 45,093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES 3,111,970 3,221,142 3,555,934 2,582,775 3,592,722 240,160 3,832,882 276,948 7.79% OTHERS 499 CONTINGENCY/TRANSFERS/OTHERS 321,750 466,554 229,247 250,000 79,247 (4,247) 75,000 (154,247) (67.28%) TOTAL OTHERS 321,750 466,554 229,247 250,000 79,247 (4,247) 75,000 (154,247) (67.28%) TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 11,423,499 12,105,945 13,168,968 9,295,086 13,635,281 415,041 14,050,323 881,355 6.69% CITY OF LINO LAKES 2025 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 10 Actual Actual Adopted Adopted 2022 2023 2024 2025 ADMINISTRATION 5.000 4.000 5.000 4.000 FINANCE 2.600 2.600 2.600 2.600 PLANNING & ZONING 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.700 1.700 2.700 2.700 ENVIRONMENTAL 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 SOLID WASTE 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 FORESTRY 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 POLICE 33.050 33.050 33.050 33.050 FIRE 6.950 6.950 6.950 6.950 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 STREETS 6.150 6.250 6.250 6.250 FLEET 2.450 2.550 2.550 2.550 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS - 0.150 0.150 0.150 PARKS 5.350 5.600 5.600 5.600 RECREATION 0.100 - - - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 69.600 69.100 71.100 70.100 ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER FUND 7.500 7.000 7.000 6.000 WATER FUND 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 SEWER FUND 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 STORM WATER FUND 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 GRAND TOTAL 87.000 86.000 88.000 86.000 Personnel are shown as Full Time Equivalents (FTE) PERSONNEL TOTALS CITY OF LINO LAKES 11 MAYOR AND COUNCIL (101-401)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 46,458 46,458 49,286 36,965 49,286 0 49,286 PERA 4121-000 2,323 2,323 2,464 1,848 2,464 0 2,464 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 674 709 715 561 715 0 715 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 81 95 269 87 80 0 80 49,536 49,585 52,734 39,461 52,545 0 52,545 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 20 0 0 19 0 0 0 20 0 0 19 0 0 0 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 0 0 4,000 0 4,000 45,000 49,000 Strategic Planning/Goal Setting Facilitator, Community Survey TELEPHONE 4321-000 0 0 0 1,375 0 3,000 3,000 Cellular Phones TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,012 0 1,500 13 1,500 0 1,500 LMC Conference, Elected Officials Conference PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 129 113 200 0 200 0 200 Meeting Notices NEWSLETTER 4343-000 30,726 22,991 24,690 15,938 24,690 510 25,200 Spring/Summer, Fall & Winter Newsletters 31,867 23,104 30,390 17,326 30,390 48,510 78,900 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 0000000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 19,107 20,034 20,650 7,186 20,650 980 21,630 League of MN Cities, MN Mayors Association CITY MARKETING 4900-000 5,707 5,230 5,500 4,869 5,500 0 5,500 Awards & Plaques, Employee Recognition & Appreciation, Lino Lakes Ambassadors, Job Fair Supplies 24,814 25,264 26,150 12,055 26,150 980 27,130 TOTAL MAYOR AND COUNCIL 106,237 97,952 109,274 68,862 109,085 49,490 158,575 CITY OF LINO LAKES 100% Mayor 4 - 100% Councilmembers 12 ADMINISTRATION (101-402)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 495,424 414,232 532,813 325,189 572,384 (68,971) 503,413 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 14,540 000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 34,315 31,018 39,961 25,338 42,929 (5,173) 37,756 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 35,673 31,377 40,760 24,364 43,787 (5,276) 38,511 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 1,725 000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 19,987 13,200 22,853 14,782 52,093 (8,901) 43,192 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 1,088 886 1,175 699 1,209 (187) 1,022 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 944 408 3,062 357 3,124 (625) 2,499 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 4135-000 0000000 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 3,280 3,341 4,360 3,795 3,638 (550) 3,088 606,976 494,462 644,984 394,525 719,164 (89,683) 629,481 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 11 000000 11000000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 18,243 20,591 13,900 13,047 13,900 6,072 19,972 Drug/Alcohol Testing, Pre-employment Assessments, Citywide Training LABOR CONSULTANTS 4310-000 2,279 3,421 9,000 4,098 9,000 0 9,000 Labor Relations, Employment Law, Contract Negotiations, Arbitration, Compensation Consultant TELEPHONE 4321-000 1,035 1,141 1,080 1,036 1,080 895 1,975 Cellular Phones TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 7,688 6,082 8,500 8,449 8,500 0 8,500 LMC Conference, ICMA Conference, MAMA Meetings, MCMA Conference, MPELRA Conferences, TCHRA Conference, NPELRA Webinars, City Clerk Certification, MCFOA Conference, Tuition Reimbursement PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 2,313 2,860 2,500 1,138 2,500 0 2,500 Legal Publications, Job Postings 31,558 34,096 34,980 27,768 34,980 6,967 41,947 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 10,037 29,097 29,800 31,261 29,800 13,505 43,305 CivicEngage, CivicClerk, American Legal Online City Code, Document Destruction, TASC, NeoGov, BS&A HR SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 2,388 3,608 3,000 1,910 3,000 700 3,700 MAMA, ICMA, MCMA, MCFOA, SHRM, GFOA, MNGFOA, MNCPA, Chain of Lakes Rotary, Dropbox, Notary 12,425 32,705 32,800 33,171 32,800 14,205 47,005 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 650,970 561,264 712,764 455,463 786,944 (68,511) 718,433 CITY OF LINO LAKES 100% City Administrator 100% Human Resources and Communications Manager100% Communications Specialist100% City Clerk 13 ELECTIONS (101-403)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 30,321 8,034 41,000 26,487 12,750 0 12,750 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0 0 0 7,725 5,000 0 5,000 PERA 4121-000 38 0 50 0 0 0 0 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 47 0 100 591 383 0 383 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 145 230 150 222 134 0 134 30,551 8,264 41,300 35,025 18,267 0 18,267 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 1,006 159 1,000 239 1,000 0 1,000 Supplies for Elections 1,006 159 1,000 239 1,000 0 1,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES POSTAGE 4322-000 0400000 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 284 168 0 297 0 0 0 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 108 2,081 200 53 200 1,900 2,100 Election Ballots (Odd years - City pays cost of municipal election ballots); Public Notices 392 2,252 200 351 200 1,900 2,100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 4,425 4,708 6,500 2,348 6,500 (6,500) 0 Voting Equipment System per Anoka County Agreement 4,425 4,708 6,500 2,348 6,500 (6,500) 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL ELECTIONS 36,374 15,383 49,000 37,963 25,967 (4,600) 21,367 CITY OF LINO LAKES Primary and General Election Judges (Even Years) General Election Judges (Odd Years) Temporaries: Election Assistant 14 CHARTER ADMINISTRATION (101-405)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail OTHER SERVICES AND SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 191 318 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 Time Savers - Minutes PROF SERVICES - CHARTER COMM 4300-999 0 350 7,920 0 7,920 1,060 8,980 Charter Commission Directed Expenses 191 668 8,920 0 8,920 1,060 9,980 TOTAL CHARTER ADMINISTRATION 191 668 8,920 0 8,920 1,060 9,980 CITY OF LINO LAKES 15 FINANCE (101-407)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 239,279 233,292 258,774 186,745 280,485 0 280,485 OVERTIME 4102-000 464 302 00000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 203 000000 PERA 4121-000 17,727 17,477 19,408 14,712 21,036 0 21,036 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 17,464 17,527 19,796 13,877 21,457 0 21,457 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 28,456 21,049 24,715 20,075 18,344 0 18,344 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 591 553 659 457 645 0 645 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,034 995 1,592 804 1,624 0 1,624 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 1,508 1,758 2,086 1,851 1,715 0 1,715 306,726 292,952 327,030 238,521 345,306 0 345,306 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 987 289 1,000 840 1,000 0 1,000 Accounts Payable Checks, W-2 Forms, 1099 Forms, Other Financial Forms 987 289 1,000 840 1,000 0 1,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 500 1,030 00000 AUDITOR 4308-000 14,666 22,775 17,500 19,630 17,500 4,000 21,500 General Fund Portion of Independent Annual Audit OTHER CONSULTANTS 4310-000 196,225 246,839 290,310 225,918 290,310 67,824 358,134 Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support BS&A Software Annual Maintenance (Financial Modules) Remainder of Springbrook Annual Maintenance ($20,382) EasyCIP Annual Maintenance TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,756 1,022 6,000 866 6,000 0 6,000 MNGFOA Conference, Continuing Professional Education, Other Finance Trainings PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 1,064 1,209 1,100 1,089 1,100 400 1,500 Publish Budget and Financial Reports TRUTH IN TAXATION 4342-000 2,079 2,295 2,500 2,473 2,500 200 2,700 City Share of Property Specific Notices PAYMENT PROCESSING 4345-000 1,037 1,014 2,000 1,053 2,000 (2,000) 0 Credit Card Processing Fees and Other Finance Charges 217,327 276,184 319,410 251,029 319,410 70,424 389,834 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 94,937 97,030 100,000 100,378 100,000 3,000 103,000 Assessing Services - Anoka County - Based on Number of Parcels, Classification, and (Un)/Improved SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 1,242 1,207 1,400 1,067 1,400 0 1,400 MNGFOA Membership, GFOA Membership, MN Board of Accountancy, MNCPA Membership, GFOA Certificate of Achievement (COA) Program 96,179 98,237 101,400 101,445 101,400 3,000 104,400 TOTAL FINANCE 621,219 667,663 748,840 591,835 767,116 73,424 840,540 85% Finance Director100% Accountant 75% Accounting Clerk II CITY OF LINO LAKES 16 LEGAL CONSULTANTS (101-414)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY 4301-000 12,264 83,568 30,000 25,110 30,000 10,000 40,000 Consulting Attorney to City Council & Staff CRIMINAL ATTORNEY 4303-000 105,076 106,229 108,000 79,349 108,000 0 108,000 Consulting Services for Criminal Prosecutions 117,340 189,796 138,000 104,458 138,000 10,000 148,000 TOTAL LEGAL CONSULTANTS 117,340 189,796 138,000 104,458 138,000 10,000 148,000 CITY OF LINO LAKES 17 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT (101-462)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 16,157 17,224 18,500 14,955 20,102 0 20,102 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 16,554 18,519 28,652 11,552 28,652 0 28,652 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 1,711 2,022 1,388 895 1,508 0 1,508 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 2,485 2,726 3,607 2,016 3,730 0 3,730 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 1,570 1,613 1,691 1,127 3,599 0 3,599 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 44 45 61 32 53 0 53 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 108 123 122 82 125 0 125 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 210 298 376 319 295 0 295 38,839 42,569 54,397 30,978 58,064 0 58,064 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 922 846 1,100 116 1,100 0 1,100 Recycling Supplies, Compostable Products MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 0000000 922 846 1,100 116 1,100 0 1,100 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 POSTAGE 4322-000 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 398 0 220 0 220 80 300 Association of Recycling Managers Workshops PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 2,327 5,373 7,000 0 7,000 (4,000) 3,000 Notices for Recycling Days, Earth Day, Etc. NEWSLETTER 4343-000 1,739 792 2,000 226 2,000 3,100 5,100 4,464 6,166 9,220 437 9,220 (820) 8,400 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 17,065 49,146 22,700 14,622 22,700 3,040 25,740 Recycling & Earth Day Vendors, Organics Service 17,065 49,146 22,700 14,622 22,700 3,040 25,740 TOTAL SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT 61,290 98,726 87,417 46,153 91,084 2,220 93,304 Note: Solid Waste Expenditures are reimbursed from Anoka County through the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board (SCORE) grant. CITY OF LINO LAKES 20% Environmental Coordinator Temporaries: Recycling Intern 18 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (101-415)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 0 10,496 400 200 400 0 400 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 9,352 000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 50 64 20 10 20 0 20 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 715 803 63606 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 0000000 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 0000000 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 0000000 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 85 130 4 168 3 0 3 10,202 11,493 430 381 429 0 429 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0 135 180 97 180 0 180 EDAC Meeting Supplies 0 135 180 97 180 0 180 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 8,785 6,547 15,350 8,184 15,350 (1,500) 13,850 Marketing Materials/Proposal Assistance - $4,500 BRE Program Assistance - 10 hrs @ $175/hr Pre Application Assistance - 40 hrs @ $190/hr TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 315 350 400 350 400 400 Econ Workshops/EDAM Annual Conference PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 59 0 300 118 300 0 300 Marketing Brochure - Notices - Advertising 9,159 6,897 16,050 8,652 16,050 (1,500) 14,550 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 000001,500 1,500 ACRED Contribution SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 695 570 725 930 725 225 950 EDAM, Sensible Land Use Coalition, Chamber of Commerce, Memberships CITY MARKETING 4900-000 69,261 75,602 80,750 39,680 80,750 0 80,750 Lodging Tax Remittals - Pass through to Twin Cities Gateway Convention and Tourism Bureau 69,956 76,172 81,475 40,610 81,475 1,725 83,200 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 89,317 94,697 98,135 49,740 98,134 225 98,359 CITY OF LINO LAKES EDA Board Stipends 19 PLANNING AND ZONING (101-416)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 95,035 101,088 105,686 76,638 111,594 0 111,594 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 7,115 7,564 7,926 6,039 8,370 0 8,370 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 7,010 7,419 8,085 5,615 8,537 0 8,537 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 7,849 8,064 8,453 6,961 8,734 0 8,734 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 253 262 265 199 265 0 265 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 539 612 612 459 625 0 625 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 615 811 1,052 938 841 0 841 118,416 125,820 132,079 96,850 138,966 0 138,966 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0 0 200 0 200 0 200 Public/Advisory Meeting Supplies 0 0 200 0 200 0 200 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 3,275 6,299 7,950 1,606 7,950 0 7,950 Legal Assistance - Ordinance Updates, GIS Mapping Updates - FEMA/Zoning/Other TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 119 1,859 1,450 135 1,450 0 1,450 Workshops - $250 MnAPA Conference - $500 P&Z Workshops (7 Members) - $400 Misc Mileage - $150 Computer Training - $150 BOARD STIPEND 4331-000 4,775 5,375 6,600 4,025 6,600 0 6,600 Commissioners - 6 @ $75 x 12 mtgs, Chair $100 x 12 mtgs PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 32 116 250 468 250 0 250 Maps, Non-Chargeable Hearing Notices 8,201 13,649 16,250 6,233 16,250 0 16,250 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 3,045 7,300 32,300 7,915 32,300 6,660 38,960 Ord Updates - Comp Plan Update - $25,000 BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - $4,060 ArcGIS & Blue Beam Annual Maintenance - $610 Misc Deliveries/Other - $290 Consultant Services - Small Area Plans - 50 hrs @ $180/hr - $9,000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 694 0 700 683 700 0 700 APA Membership, Misc Reference Materials 3,739 7,300 33,000 8,598 33,000 6,660 39,660 TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING 130,356 146,769 181,529 111,681 188,416 6,660 195,076 CITY OF LINO LAKES 100% Planner 20 ENGINEERING (101-417)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 0 3,676 00000 0 3,676 00000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 44,991 45,179 45,500 34,894 45,500 0 45,500 Traffic Counts - $3,500 Engineering Consultant (Hourly) - $42,000 44,991 45,179 45,500 34,894 45,500 0 45,500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 4410-000 54,397 52,212 50,354 29,373 50,354 2,996 53,350 Engineering Consultant (Retainer) - $97,000 CD (55%) - $53,350 Sewer Utility (15%) - $14,550 Water Utility (15%) - $14,550 Storm Utility (15%) - $14,550 CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 500 2,053 1,609 1,669 1,609 0 1,609 ArcGIS Annual Maintenance - $500 Bluebeam Annual Maintenance - $109 Aerial Photo - $1,000 54,897 54,265 51,963 31,042 51,963 2,996 54,959 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL ENGINEERING 99,888 103,120 97,463 65,936 97,463 2,996 100,459 CITY OF LINO LAKES 21 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (101-418)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 145,467 157,356 236,753 122,227 251,770 0 251,770 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 504 504 504 0 504 0 504 PERA 4121-000 10,910 11,774 17,756 9,624 18,883 0 18,883 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 11,076 12,066 18,112 9,347 19,260 0 19,260 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0 0 0 703 0 0 0 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 10,795 11,664 19,426 9,661 19,987 0 19,987 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 325 340 617 262 560 0 560 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 494 612 1,654 459 1,687 0 1,687 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 955 1,415 2,383 1,667 1,917 0 1,917 180,526 195,730 297,205 153,949 314,568 0 314,568 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 176 45 100 0 100 0 100 176 45 100 0 100 0 100 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 6,161 7,003 7,000 4,153 7,000 0 7,000 DataLink (GIS) Annual Service and Maintenance - $5,000 Mapping and Database Design - $2,000 TELEPHONE 4321-000 0 0 0 226 0 600 600 Staff Cell Phone TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 214 679 1,600 694 1,600 1,600 3,200 Seminars, Conference, Training & Mileage PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 161 203 0 95 0 0 0 6,536 7,885 8,600 5,168 8,600 2,200 10,800 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 0 109 1,352 119 1,352 0 1,352 Bluebeam Annual Maintenance, ESRI SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 722 922 1,425 724 1,425 0 1,425 APA/AICP Membership 722 1,031 2,777 843 2,777 0 2,777 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 187,960 204,692 308,682 159,960 326,045 2,200 328,245 CITY OF LINO LAKES 70% Community Development Director 100% Community Development Specialist100% Administrative Assistant 22 ENVIRONMENTAL (101-461)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 24,236 25,835 27,751 22,432 30,153 0 30,153 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 11,228 4,480 17,100 7,776 17,100 0 17,100 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 1,832 1,933 2,081 1,343 2,261 0 2,261 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 2,687 2,306 3,431 2,293 3,615 0 3,615 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 2,355 2,419 2,536 1,691 5,399 0 5,399 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 66 68 84 49 80 0 80 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 162 184 184 122 187 0 187 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 228 268 447 387 356 0 356 42,794 37,493 53,614 36,093 59,151 0 59,151 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0000000 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 0 536 700 11 700 0 700 Chemicals, Seed, etc. (Includes Blue Heron Rookery Supplies) SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 66 223 300 0 300 0 300 Sprayers, Soil Probes, etc. 66 759 1,000 11 1,000 0 1,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 447 1,262 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 Ecologist, Hydrologist - Environmental Reviews/Research & Development, Resource Management Planning TELEPHONE 4321-000 349 368 400 443 400 0 400 Staff Cell Phone TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,243 1,136 1,500 610 1,500 0 1,500 Various Training Seminars, Conferences, Mileage - 1 Staff & Environmental Board, Wetland Delineation Training BOARD STIPEND 4331-000 4,525 4,525 6,600 1,975 6,600 0 6,600 Commissioners - 6 @ $75 x 12 mtgs, Chair $100 x 12 mtgs 6,564 7,292 9,500 3,027 9,500 0 9,500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 919 1,028 1,109 1,132 1,109 0 1,109 ArcGIS Annual Maintenance - $1,000 Bluebeam Annual Maintenance - $109 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 51 201 300 175 300 0 300 Professional Memberships - ISA, MWPA, Tree Care 970 1,229 1,409 1,307 1,409 0 1,409 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 50,394 46,772 65,523 40,438 71,060 0 71,060 CITY OF LINO LAKES 30% Environmental Coordinator Temporaries: Seasonal Position 23 FORESTRY (101-463)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 20,197 21,530 23,125 18,694 25,127 0 25,127 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 1,540 1,611 1,734 1,119 1,885 0 1,885 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 1,523 1,636 1,769 1,415 1,922 0 1,922 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 1,962 2,016 2,113 1,409 4,499 0 4,499 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 54 57 73 40 66 0 66 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 135 153 153 102 156 0 156 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 1,160 1,659 1,918 1,719 1,571 0 1,571 26,571 28,661 30,885 24,498 35,226 0 35,226 SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 2,655 2,129 3,000 1,248 3,000 0 3,000 Fertilizers, Staking Material, EAB Chemicals - Treat 100 Ash Annually - 3 Yr Cycle SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 329 184 250 0 250 0 250 2,984 2,313 3,250 1,248 3,250 0 3,250 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES UNIFORMS 4370-000 373 378 380 162 380 0 380 373 378 380 162 380 0 380 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 78,938 61,135 50,000 47,642 50,000 25,000 75,000 Damaged/Diseased Tree Removal/Oakwilt Control - $7,500 Emerald Ash Borer Tree Replacement Program - $60,000 Blvd Tree Replacement - $7,500 RENTED EQUIPMENT 4415-000 188 000000 79,126 61,135 50,000 47,642 50,000 25,000 75,000 TOTAL FORESTRY 109,054 92,487 84,515 73,549 88,856 25,000 113,856 CITY OF LINO LAKES 25% Environmental Coordinator 24 POLICE (101-420)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 2,952,116 2,957,286 3,276,864 2,125,099 3,440,871 0 3,440,871 OVERTIME 4102-000 121,915 130,091 100,000 102,819 100,000 0 100,000 PART-TIME WAGES 4103-000 000099,801 0 99,801 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 11,524 18,708 15,600 15,024 0 0 0 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 1,003 1,094 1,500 0 1,203 0 1,203 PERA 4121-000 498,793 509,856 565,743 404,775 605,273 0 605,273 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 61,470 61,757 69,586 43,618 75,861 0 75,861 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 4,133 1,652 0 1,438 0 0 0 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 294,892 288,910 325,916 255,978 377,872 0 377,872 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 6,789 6,793 7,876 5,166 8,038 0 8,038 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 13,381 15,956 19,324 11,855 19,710 0 19,710 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 193,324 290,198 335,197 295,696 268,233 0 268,233 4,159,340 4,282,300 4,717,606 3,261,467 4,996,862 0 4,996,862 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 6,085 6,567 8,100 3,667 8,100 0 8,100 Business Cards, Letterhead and Envelopes, Toner/Printer Cartridges, Paper, DVD Discs, Misc Supplies, Ticketwriter Paper Rolls MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 15,419 16,662 19,200 16,670 19,200 800 20,000 Ammo, Taser Supplies, Range Supplies, Simunition, DMT Gas, Property Evidence Supplies, N95 Masks, Portable Radio Batteries YOUTH PROGRAMS 4213-000 2,856 2,279 3,310 2,084 3,310 0 3,310 Supplies, Youth Safety Camp, Firearms Safety Camp, Snowmobile Safety, Explorers, Junior Citizen's Academy CRIME PREVENTION/SAFETY 4214-000 3,869 5,230 6,400 5,023 6,400 0 6,400 Night to Unite, Volunteer Appreciation, Open House, Promotional Materials, Volunteer Clothing, Citizens Academy Supplies and Shirts, CERT SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 30,520 33,399 45,502 31,032 45,502 13,198 58,700 Tasers, Computers & Peripherals, UAS Ground Station, Gas Masks, Emergency Warning System Equipment Upgrade & Replacement 58,749 64,138 82,512 58,477 82,512 13,998 96,510 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 11,626 9,642 11,670 6,098 11,670 (1,470) 10,200 Critical Incident Debriefing, POST License Renewal, Employee Mental Health Program TELEPHONE 4321-000 23,015 21,006 24,760 14,986 24,760 (760) 24,000 Cell Phones, Mobile Hot Spot POSTAGE 4322-000 809 973 1,000 58 1,000 (500) 500 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 45,325 45,609 48,755 28,080 48,755 0 48,755 Anoka Chief, POST Mandate, Range Fees, Conference, IACP, Instructor Training, K-9 Conference, EMR Training, Tuition Reimbursement, LMC Patrol INSURANCE 4360-000 52,897 60,033 64,250 62,460 64,250 (375) 63,875 Police Liability Insurance UNIFORMS 4370-000 40,231 35,387 40,023 24,477 40,023 9,300 49,323 Uniform Allowance (Officers, Sergeants, Admin), CSO Uniforms, Ballistic Vests, Replacement Uniforms ELECTRICITY 4381-000 417 434 420 288 420 80 500 Emergency Siren Electricity RESERVES 4386-000 2,297 1,235 2,000 853 2,000 0 2,000 Uniforms, Equipment, Training, Supplies 176,617 174,319 192,878 137,300 192,878 6,275 199,153 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 64,102 58,727 67,932 62,105 67,932 11,197 79,129 RMS - JLEC, 800 MHz Contract, State of MN CJDN, Virtra Annual Contract, Emergency Sirens, LEXIPOL, Vector Solutions, Shredding, Otter Lake Animal Hospital, Video Redaction Subscription, DETOX Dakota County, Metro Sales, Schedule Anywhere, 3SI Security, Midwest Radar, LEADS, Archive Social, Health Strategies FIT SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 1,575 2,068 1,694 1,827 1,694 0 1,694 Professional Memberships & Subscriptions: IACP, MCPA, MN Criminal Intelligence Association, MAPET, MACIA, PLEAA, Tri-County, PERF 65,677 60,795 69,626 63,931 69,626 11,197 80,823 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 4,460,383 4,581,552 5,062,622 3,521,175 5,341,878 31,470 5,373,348 CITY OF LINO LAKES 85% Public Safety Director 100% Deputy Director Police 85% Public Safety Captain 5 - 100% Sergeants 20 - 100% Patrol Officers 2 - 100% Records Techs 85% Administrative Assistant 100% Investigative Assistant Overtime: Patrol, Court, Training, Special Events, DWI Enforcement Part-time: 3 - 0.5 FTE Community Service Officers, 1 - Background Investigator 25 FIRE (101-421)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 263,467 284,680 294,952 212,258 314,612 0 314,612 OVERTIME 4102-000 257 581 500 818 500 0 500 PART-TIME WAGES 4103-000 102,779 135,325 244,814 174,760 281,178 0 281,178 PAID ON CALL FIREFIGHTERS 4104-000 101,647 99,638 137,000 85,452 134,000 0 134,000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 FIRE STIPEND 4109-000 10,047 7,652 10,234 5,059 10,541 0 10,541 PERA 4121-000 52,920 59,970 71,480 53,642 77,643 0 77,643 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 20,606 22,843 34,242 23,225 37,143 0 37,143 PERA SVF CONTRIBUTION 4124-000 0 147,297 0 0 139,631 0 139,631 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 24,430 25,633 25,651 20,474 26,145 0 26,145 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 575 596 709 456 651 0 651 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 775 888 1,501 651 1,531 0 1,531 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 60,752 63,726 84,318 74,445 58,002 0 58,002 638,255 848,829 905,401 651,240 1,081,577 0 1,081,577 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 1,637 1,086 1,600 717 1,600 0 1,600 Paper, Toner/Printer Cartridges, Business Cards, Pens MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 3,052 7,550 7,675 1,451 7,675 0 7,675 Foam, Saw Blades, Floor Dry, Batteries, N95 Masks YOUTH PROGRAM 4213-000 1,360 196 1,000 260 1,000 0 1,000 Safety Camp FIRE PREVENTION 4214-000 3,150 2,863 3,000 2,532 3,000 0 3,000 Citizen Academy, Marketing Materials SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 12,462 44,985 18,750 1,958 18,750 0 18,750 Tool Replacement and Repairs, Outfit Vehicles 21,661 56,679 32,025 6,917 32,025 0 32,025 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 5,879 7,045 9,525 3,204 9,525 0 9,525 FF Certification, FF Licensure, Hepatitis Vaccination Series, Medical/Drug Exam, Employee Mental Health Program TELEPHONE 4321-000 2,775 4,118 4,450 2,833 4,450 (340) 4,110 Cell Phones, Mobile Hot Spot, Cell Stipend, Air Cards POSTAGE 4322-000 1,333 1,620 1,000 18 1,000 0 1,000 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 38,024 40,700 30,000 26,387 30,000 10,000 40,000 Fire Inc., Training Supplies, Medical Training, AWAIR/OSHA Training Staff Development, Conference, FF1, FF2, HazMat Initial Training PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 500 3,150 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 Marketing Materials UNIFORMS 4370-000 99,450 31,324 61,500 38,049 61,500 24,400 85,900 New Hire Turn-out & Wildland Fire Gear, Misc Uniform Items, Turn-out Gear Replacement 147,961 87,956 107,475 70,491 107,475 34,060 141,535 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 39,396 34,371 47,604 68,529 47,604 2,459 50,063 Ladder Testing, SCBA Flow Testing, PSDS, Dispatch Application, Foam System Service, Pump Testing, Pump Service, Aerial Service, LEXIPOL, Vector, Accessory Svc for Fans, Generators, Extraction, Saws, Alex Air Compressor Annual Maintenance & Test, Transunion Backgrounds, Motorola 800 MHz Contract, Archive Social, Health Strategies FIT SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 1,355 1,620 1,520 1,405 1,520 175 1,695 MN IAAI, Metro Fire Chiefs, Anoka Co. Fire Protection Assn, MSFCA, International Assn, NFPA 40,751 35,991 49,124 69,934 49,124 2,634 51,758 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT 848,628 1,029,456 1,094,025 798,581 1,270,201 36,694 1,306,895 CITY OF LINO LAKES 15% Public Safety Director 100% Deputy Director Fire 15% Public Safety Captain 15% Administrative Assistant 100% Fire Lieutenant/Fire Inspector Part-time Daytime Duty Crew Firefighters - 12 hr shifts, 5 days/week Paid-On-Call Firefighters - Calls/Training Drills/Command Stipends Stipend: Cross-trained Fire/Rescue 26 BUILDING INSPECTIONS (101-422)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 291,149 340,924 376,353 221,228 396,504 0 396,504 OVERTIME SALARIES 4102-000 201 000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 400 410 0 0 418 0 418 PERA 4121-000 21,664 25,507 28,227 17,511 29,738 0 29,738 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 21,253 25,476 28,791 16,319 30,333 0 30,333 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 41,904 42,478 44,204 26,718 38,296 0 38,296 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 769 919 977 548 1,011 0 1,011 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,416 2,144 2,756 944 2,811 0 2,811 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 2,034 3,106 3,640 3,193 2,903 0 2,903 380,790 440,964 484,948 286,461 502,014 0 502,014 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 1,706 1,223 1,500 683 1,500 (200) 1,300 Card Stock for Building Permits, Correction Notice Forms, Septic System Pumping Forms, Code Books SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 3,429 935 250 0 250 0 250 Gas Monitor Calibration, Shovels, Tapes etc. 5,135 2,158 1,750 683 1,750 (200) 1,550 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 6,478 4,700 6,000 0 6,000 11,000 17,000 BS&A Software Annual Maintenance TELEPHONE 4321-000 2,083 2,019 2,200 1,328 2,200 0 2,200 Inspections Cell Phones & Wi-Fi TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,060 1,660 3,300 1,685 3,300 0 3,300 Staff Training & Mileage, SSTS Cert UNIFORMS 4370-000 985 902 1,140 233 1,140 0 1,140 Building Inspections Staff 10,606 9,281 12,640 3,246 12,640 11,000 23,640 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 23,467 34,850 37,220 45,781 37,220 0 37,220 Large Format Scanning - $500 Back-Up Inspection Services - $36,720 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 180 0 520 345 520 0 520 AMBO - $200, 10K Lakes Chapter - $125, Inspector Certs 23,647 34,850 37,740 46,126 37,740 0 37,740 TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTIONS 420,178 487,252 537,078 336,516 554,144 10,800 564,944 CITY OF LINO LAKES 100% Building Official 2 - 100% Building Inspectors 100% Building Permit Technician 50% Office Specialist 27 STREETS (101-430)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 418,333 428,536 488,150 314,573 510,321 0 510,321 OVERTIME 4102-000 11,162 7,574 12,000 2,618 12,000 0 12,000 ON CALL/PAGER 4105-000 6,074 6,049 6,000 15,112 6,000 0 6,000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 36,329 24,367 43,320 17,820 43,320 0 43,320 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 33,785 34,027 37,961 26,122 39,624 0 39,624 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 34,914 34,228 42,034 25,156 43,731 0 43,731 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 101 000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 43,265 45,772 50,293 35,831 51,817 0 51,817 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 1,145 1,142 1,348 831 1,338 0 1,338 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 2,296 3,144 3,828 2,090 3,905 0 3,905 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 845 000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 37,152 37,523 50,529 43,705 39,521 0 39,521 625,401 622,361 735,463 483,858 751,577 0 751,577 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 9,050 8,048 12,000 6,163 12,000 0 12,000 Boulevard & Median Maintenance Materials: Geo-fabric, Fertilizers, Pesticides, Irrigation Components, Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Products, Grass Seed/Sod. Construction Materials: Lumber, Plywood, Screws, Nails, Nuts/Bolts/Washers, Bagged Concrete, Grout, Bentonite, Stakes/Lathe. Equipment Wear Items: Street Sweeper Center Brooms and Gutter Brooms, Plow Blades/Cutting Edges, Ditch Mower Blades, Saw Blades. Safety Items: High Visibility Vests, Shirts, Eye Protection, Ear Protection, Insect Repellent, Sunscreen, Hardhats, Chainsaw PPE. Any Products or Parts Intended for Streets Maintenance and Equipment Electrical Cords, Batteries, Rope, Tape, Cable, Glue, Paints & Solvents, Plumbing STREET SIGNS 4223-000 7,967 7,160 15,000 14,465 15,000 0 15,000 Traffic Regulatory Signs, Parking Signs, Warning Signs, Construction Signs, Work Zone Signs, Public Awareness Signs, School Signs, Trail Signs, Reflective Tape/Sheeting, Barricades, Traffic Cones, Sign Posts, Hardware, Any Materials and Supplies Purchased Specifically for the Construction or Maintenance of Signs & Barricades PATCHING MATERIALS 4224-000 62,698 51,404 87,500 84,378 87,500 12,500 100,000 Hot Asphalt, Cold Asphalt (i.e. UPM Bagged and Bulk), Asphalt Emulsion (tack), Crack Fill Material, Detackifier (for Crack Fill Operations) SALT/SAND 4228-000 57,021 73,333 97,500 59,558 97,500 0 97,500 Regular Road Salt, Treated Road Salt, Bagged Sidewalk Salt, Sand used for Snow and Ice Management, Any Materials and Supplies Purchased Specifically to Facilitate the use of Salt (Brine or Solid) for Snow and Ice GRAVEL AND MISCELLANEOUS 4229-000 5,482 1,713 7,000 973 7,000 0 7,000 Class V, Sand (not for Winter Operations), Rock, Chip Rock, Rip-rap, Topsoil, Compost, Mulch, and Woodchips SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 1,883 2,973 4,000 380 4,000 0 4,000 Rakes, Snow Shovels, Flat Shovels, Spades, Loots, Sprayers, Pitch Forks, Push Brooms, Hand Tools, Power Tools, Tool Boxes & Containers, Jacks, Trailer Jacks, Winches, Chains/Binders, Ratchet Straps, Ladders, Chainsaws, Chainsaw Sharpeners, Weed Whips, Manual/Electric/Gas Engine Pumps, Locks 144,101 144,632 223,000 166,118 223,000 12,500 235,500 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 12,300 9,064 12,450 10,597 12,450 0 12,450 Consulting, Engineering, Hazardous Waste Recycling, Cartegraph TELEPHONE 4321-000 1,147 1,390 1,000 1,016 1,000 450 1,450 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 2,945 5,593 5,000 2,075 5,000 0 5,000 Staff Training & Mileage UNIFORMS 4370-000 1,880 1,857 2,600 323 2,600 0 2,600 STREET LIGHTS 4385-000 88,760 97,009 95,000 77,095 95,000 109,000 204,000 Electricity & Repair of City-Owned Street Lights, 2025 - New Light Pole at Sioux Ln and Hokah Dr ($9,000), Upgrade 10 Lighting Fixtures and Underground Conduit & Wiring on Fawn Ln ($55,000), Legacy Light Post Painting 114 Light Poles ($45,000) 107,032 114,913 116,050 91,107 116,050 109,450 225,500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 55,609 57,541 70,500 47,320 70,500 0 70,500 Patching/Spray Patching, Dead Deer Removal, Signal Maintenance, Contract Median and Round-A-Bout Maintenance RENTED EQUIPMENT 4415-000 739 0 1,000 5,919 1,000 0 1,000 Traffic Control Sign Rental, Crack Fill Kettle, Rented Skid Steer/Toolcat Attachments, Tools, Vehicles, Equipment SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 0000000 56,348 57,541 71,500 53,239 71,500 0 71,500 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 89,100 000000 89,100 000000 TOTAL STREETS 1,021,982 939,447 1,146,013 794,323 1,162,127 121,950 1,284,077 CITY OF LINO LAKES 15% Public Services Director 20% Public Services Superintendent 70% Streets Supervisor 5 - 100% General Maintenance Workers 20% Administrative Assistant Overtime: Snowplowing, Street Repairs, Unforeseen Emergencies Temporaries: Seasonal Positions 28 FLEET MANAGEMENT (101-431)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 168,525 202,988 219,874 158,796 236,932 0 236,932 OVERTIME 4102-000 2,326 1,680 3,000 3,660 3,000 0 3,000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 12,213 15,070 16,716 12,773 17,995 0 17,995 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 10,901 15,045 17,050 11,802 18,355 0 18,355 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 101 000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 24,672 16,578 17,561 14,049 17,963 0 17,963 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 420 509 622 413 605 0 605 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,083 1,511 1,562 1,171 1,593 0 1,593 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 6,178 6,523 8,556 7,500 6,949 0 6,949 226,419 259,904 284,941 210,163 303,392 0 303,392 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0 77 00000 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 10,297 12,260 9,300 6,034 9,300 0 9,300 Shop Supplies (Brake Clean, Windex, Paper Towels, Spray Bottles, Penetrating Oils, WD40), Vehicle Washes ($7,300 - 2 Times/Month Apr-Oct, 4 Times/Month Nov-Mar) FUELS 4212-000 191,879 164,103 160,000 116,467 160,000 (10,000) 150,000 Gasoline & Diesel for all City Vehicles (Includes Police/Fire & Equipment) SHOP PARTS 4221-000 55,911 92,148 70,000 35,315 70,000 0 70,000 All Replacement Parts to Repair Vehicles, All Maintenance Parts (Including Filters, Bulk Lubricants, Engine Oils, ATF's, Gear Lubes, Coolants, etc.) SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 10,395 5,118 7,000 6,027 7,000 0 7,000 New and/or Replacement Tools for the Shop (Hand tools, Battery Powered Tools, Specialty Tools, etc.) 268,482 273,706 246,300 163,844 246,300 (10,000) 236,300 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 55,890 42,783 60,500 44,000 60,500 0 60,500 Annual DOT Inspections, Annual Boom/Hoist Inspections, Alignments, Repairs, Cartegraph TELEPHONE 4321-000 20 53 1,920 1,161 1,920 60 1,980 GPS Service for Pace Controls POSTAGE 4322-000 0 11 00000 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 248 1,816 1,500 1,133 1,500 0 1,500 Training & Testing to Maintain Required Licenses and Certificates (ASE Certification & Testing, Automotive Training Classes or Seminars) AUTO INSURANCE 4363-000 43,266 45,778 40,640 51,167 40,640 14,055 54,695 Insurance for Entire Fleet, Including Police & Fire UNIFORMS 4370-000 673 560 760 159 760 0 760 100,097 91,001 105,320 97,620 105,320 14,115 119,435 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 107,045 152,302 66,000 135,421 66,000 64,000 130,000 Maintain & Repair Fire Equipment SUBSCRIPTIONS AND DUES 4452-000 1,500 1,600 1,500 100 1,500 100 1,600 ALLData Online Repair Manual Subscription, Used Oil Class License Fee 108,545 153,902 67,500 135,521 67,500 64,100 131,600 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 20,585 000000 20,585 000000 TOTAL FLEET MANAGEMENT 724,128 778,513 704,061 607,148 722,512 68,215 790,727 CITY OF LINO LAKES 15% Public Services Director 20% Public Services Superintendent2 - 100% Mechanic20% Administrative Assistant Overtime: Emergency Repairs, Snowplowing 29 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS (101-432)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 1,720 23,559 25,184 18,236 26,478 0 26,478 OVERTIME SALARIES 4102-000 0000000 PART-TIME WAGES 4103-000 0 24,792 53,820 22,871 57,528 0 57,528 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 6,930 9,594 9,880 9,639 9,880 0 9,880 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 129 3,419 5,925 2,810 6,300 0 6,300 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 654 4,316 6,800 3,798 7,182 0 7,182 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 0000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 0 1,210 1,268 1,044 1,310 0 1,310 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 0 40 73 30 40 0 40 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 0 92 92 69 94 0 94 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 674 3,374 5,429 4,758 4,329 0 4,329 10,107 70,395 108,471 63,254 113,141 0 113,141 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 10,192 8,209 10,000 4,863 10,000 0 10,000 Supplies for Office Operations MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 30,129 32,334 35,000 23,178 35,000 0 35,000 Replacement Parts, Janitorial Supplies, Landscaping Materials SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 6,874 21,306 2,400 2,090 2,400 2,500 4,900 2025 - Portable Kaivac Machine 47,195 61,849 47,400 30,131 47,400 2,500 49,900 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 53,136 43,475 59,000 42,062 59,000 0 59,000 Repair/Calibration of HVAC System, Repairs in City Buildings, Safety Systems Monitoring TELEPHONE 4321-000 7,440 6,302 8,000 4,398 8,000 0 8,000 Telephone & Internet Service Charges POSTAGE 4322-000 5,079 4,682 5,500 5,500 5,500 0 5,500 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 479 000000 INSURANCE 4361-000 132,613 140,365 160,310 159,665 160,310 8,655 168,965 General Liability, Property, Excess Liability ELECTRICITY 4381-000 121,019 114,198 125,000 68,208 125,000 0 125,000 For All City Facilities UTILITIES 4382-000 20,338 23,634 18,000 16,556 18,000 4,000 22,000 Sewer, Water, Irrigation HEAT 4383-000 56,423 48,934 54,000 28,499 54,000 0 54,000 Civic Complex & Other City Facilities SANITATION 4384-000 11,655 12,384 15,000 11,039 15,000 0 15,000 Refuse Collection for City Complex & Other City Facilities 408,181 393,974 444,810 335,926 444,810 12,655 457,465 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 114,163 52,464 23,000 22,165 23,000 10,840 33,840 Pest Control, Copier Maintenance, Fire Extinguisher Maintenance, Postage Machine Rental, Shredder, Roof Inspections, Read/Calibrate Scales, Garage Door Maintenance SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 364 294 400 294 400 0 400 Newspaper 114,527 52,758 23,400 22,459 23,400 10,840 34,240 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 580,010 578,975 624,081 451,770 628,751 25,995 654,746 CITY OF LINO LAKES 15% Public Services Director Boiler Tech Endorsement Part-Time: Custodial Maintenance - Civic Complex, Fire #1, Fire #2, Public Works Temporaries: Seasonal Position 30 PARKS (101-450)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 340,035 426,348 464,222 335,678 492,871 0 492,871 OVERTIME 4102-000 1,128 1,611 2,000 396 2,000 0 2,000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 29,780 52,003 78,080 37,664 53,568 0 53,568 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 25,465 30,769 34,967 26,476 37,115 0 37,115 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 27,056 33,590 41,639 27,108 41,956 0 41,956 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 1,413 1,46600000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 30,906 41,112 43,757 34,667 44,622 0 44,622 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 898 1,021 1,263 880 1,257 0 1,257 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,939 3,022 3,430 2,113 3,498 0 3,498 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0003000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 19,830 32,601 40,621 33,567 30,645 0 30,645 478,450 623,544 709,979 498,552 707,532 0 707,532 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0 0 0 200000 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 74,253 45,670 47,000 38,712 47,000 0 47,000 Engineered Wood Fiber, Fencing & Netting, Trees, Plantings, Rock, Ag-Lime, Pea Rock, Class V, Fertilizer, Seed, Herbicides, Line Chalk, Field Marking Paint, Clay, Sod, Irrigation System Maint/Repair/Upgrade, Paint, Lumber, Dog Waste Bags SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 5,589 2,673 3,000 2,319 3,000 16,000 19,000 Hand Tools, Small Power Tools, Mowers, Chain Saws, Weed Whips, 2025 - Battery Powered Tools ($1,000), Tool Cat Attachments - 74" Snowblower ($8,000) & 68" Angle Broom ($7,000) 79,842 48,343 50,000 41,231 50,000 16,000 66,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 8,867 17,362 8,150 15,866 8,150 0 8,150 Cartegraph, Engineering, Electrical TELEPHONE 4321-000 675 696 1,000 706 1,000 0 1,000 Cell Phones, iPads TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,948 3,302 3,000 2,364 3,000 0 3,000 Certification Training, Seminars, Computer Training, Mileage BOARD STIPEND 4331-000 2,100 3,425 2,750 2,150 2,750 0 2,750 Board Members - 6 @ $75 x 5 mtgs; Chair $100 x 5 mtgs ADVERTISING 4340-000 0 0 0 136000 UNIFORMS 4370-000 1,520 1,462 1,900 1,022 1,900 0 1,900 ELECTRICITY 4381-000 3,293 3,178 3,500 1,500 3,500 0 3,500 Park Buildings and Shelters, Security Lighting, Hockey Rink Lights UTILITIES (WATER/SEWER) 4382-000 35,305 51,299 40,000 14,549 40,000 8,000 48,000 Irrigation HEAT 4383-000 4,803 4,416 5,000 2,357 5,000 0 5,000 SANITATION 4384-000 991 1,090 1,800 1,165 1,800 0 1,800 Trash/Recycling 59,502 86,229 67,100 41,814 67,100 8,000 75,100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 117,438 165,225 254,000 147,927 254,000 0 254,000 Portable Restrooms, Weed Control, Tree/Stump Removal, Trail Construction/Repair/Maint, Irrigation Systems, 2025 - Replace Birch Park Boardwalk 305' ($10,000), Foxborough Center Boardwalk 240' ($15,000), Replace The Preserve Boardwalk 430' ($27,000), Crackfill and Chip Seal Birch Park Parking lot ($8,000), Mill and Overlay Trail 2000'-2500' of Failing Trail ($116,000) RENTED EQUIPMENT 4415-000 (147) 790 500 0 500 0 500 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 106 75 200 10 200 0 200 Professional Memberships & Subscriptions 117,397 166,090 254,700 147,937 254,700 0 254,700 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 5,566000000 5,566000000 TOTAL PARKS 740,757 924,207 1,081,779 729,534 1,079,332 24,000 1,103,332 CITY OF LINO LAKES 40% Public Services Director 100% Parks Supervisor 4 - 100% General Maintenance Workers 20% Administrative Assistant Temporaries: Summer Seasonal PositionsWinter Warming House Attendants 31 RECREATION (101-451)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 17,591 000000 OVERTIME 4102-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 8,250 000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 1,275 000000 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 1,950 000000 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 203 000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 1,390 000000 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 38 000000 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 88 000000 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 13,665 000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 608 000000 45,058 000000 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0000000 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 0000000 0000000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 0000000 TELEPHONE 4321-000 35 000000 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 0000000 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 0000000 NEWSLETTER - PROGRAM SCHEDULE 4343-000 0000000 35000000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 0000000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL RECREATION 45,093 000000 CITY OF LINO LAKES 32 OTHERS (101-499)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail CONTINGENCY 4905-000 0 0 79,247 0 79,247 (4,247) 75,000 Operating Contingency OPERATING TRANSFERS 4910-000 321,750 466,554 150,000 250,000 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHERS 321,750 466,554 229,247 250,000 79,247 (4,247) 75,000 SUMMARY BY CATEGORY PERSONAL SERVICES 7,974,957 8,435,327 9,581,467 6,505,278 10,197,780 (89,683) 10,108,098 SUPPLIES 631,337 659,727 690,817 469,970 690,817 34,798 725,615 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES 1,488,994 1,571,217 1,683,673 1,237,009 1,683,673 334,296 2,017,969 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 891,210 973,119 983,764 832,830 983,764 139,877 1,123,641 CAPITAL OUTLAY 115,251 - - - - - - OTHERS 321,750 466,554 229,247 250,000 79,247 (4,247) 75,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,423,499 12,105,945 13,168,968 9,295,086 13,635,281 415,041 14,050,323 CITY OF LINO LAKES 33 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail Property Taxes General Property Tax 202-000-3010-000 0 325,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 100,000 600,000 0 325,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 100,000 600,000 Intergovernmental Other Federal Revenue 202-000-3319-000 500,000 270,354 00000American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds Other Grants 202-000-3372-000 7,935 8,381 0 8,825 0 8,000 8,000 Twin Cities Gateway (TCG) Grant Funds 507,935 278,735 0 8,825 0 8,000 8,000 Charges For Services Annual Membership Fees 202-000-3470-000 60,966 110,456 208,000 98,969 208,000 (69,042) 138,958 Increase in 2025 Rates and 5% Membership Increase Monthly Membership Fees 202-000-3471-000 217,629 507,519 655,200 441,779 655,200 (68,553) 586,647 Increase in 2025 Rates and 5% Membership Increase Daily Use Fees 202-000-3472-000 25,638 53,191 80,600 41,694 80,600 (21,600) 59,000 EF Basic Classes/Programs 202-000-3473-000 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 Revenue Shared per Professional Service Agreement EF Personal & Specialty Train 202-000-3474-000 25,470 20,664 75,000 20,741 75,000 (50,000) 25,000 Revenue Shared per Professional Service Agreement EF Spinning Classes 202-000-3475-000 0 2,941 25,000 2,987 25,000 (22,000) 3,000 Revenue Shared per Professional Service Agreement Gym Rentals 202-000-3476-000 1,200 1,018 5,000 4,448 5,000 3,000 8,000 Pool Rentals 202-000-3477-000 2,560 8,956 15,000 28,825 15,000 35,000 50,000 Room Rentals 202-000-3478-000 1,585 4,077 7,500 8,767 7,500 4,500 12,000 Birthday Party Rentals 202-000-3479-000 4,825 000000Accounted for in Program Revenue Beginning in 2023 Retail Sales 202-000-3480-000 137 1,478 3,000 932 3,000 (1,500) 1,500 Enrollment Fees 202-000-3481-000 14,001 15,834 30,000 7,293 30,000 (20,000) 10,000 Locker Rental 202-000-3482-000 193 1,536 4,500 900 4,500 (3,300) 1,200 Towel Service 202-000-3483-000 1,099 3,539 7,000 3,280 7,000 (2,000) 5,000 Child Watch 202-000-3484-000 763 1,272 1,000 1,272 1,000 0 1,000 Non-Member Daily Fees Program Revenue 202-000-3485-000 39,678 198,120 250,020 316,074 250,020 93,644 343,664 See Program Budget Detail 395,744 930,601 1,366,820 978,102 1,366,820 (121,851) 1,244,969 Investment Earnings Interest On Investments 202-000-3620-000 0 0 0 1,642 0 500 500 Change in Fair Value of Investments 202-000-3621-000 0 0 0 2,651 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,294 0 500 500 Miscellaneous Refunds & Reimbursements 202-000-3730-000 15 500 00000 Silver Sneakers 202-000-3731-000 13,755 31,889 42,100 26,725 42,100 (3,000) 39,100 Renew Active/One Pass 202-000-3732-000 13,664 31,094 53,000 25,120 53,000 (13,000) 40,000 Cash Over (Short)202-000-3800-000 58 98 0 73 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 202-000-3810-000 0000000 27,492 63,582 95,100 51,917 95,100 (16,000) 79,100 Other Operating Transfers 202-000-3920-000 20,626 593,777 00000 20,626 593,777 00000 Total Revenues 951,797 2,191,694 1,961,920 1,293,138 1,961,920 (29,351) 1,932,569 CITY OF LINO LAKES THE ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER FUND (202) 2025 ADOPTED BUDGET 34 DEPARTMENT ACCT # NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Rookery 41XX Personal Services Remove Activity Center Manager Position (111,424)$ Rookery 41XX Personal Services Increase Part-Time budget for current positions 66,550$ Rookery 4205 Program Supplies Increase priarily due to increase in Summer Camp supplies offset by a decrease in Community Program supplies 2,338$ Rookery 4211 Maintenance Supplies Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (9,300)$ Rookery 4222 Chemicals Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (2,000)$ Rookery 4235 Resale Items Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (2,000)$ Rookery 4240 Small Tools Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (3,000)$ Rookery 4300 Professional Services Increase to account for actual costs incurred 20,000$ Rookery 4310 Other Consultant Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support 10.00% fee increase 3,125$ Rookery 4310 Other Consultant CivicRec Annual Maintenance 5.00% fee increase 1,045$ Rookery 4321 Telephone Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (900)$ Rookery 4322 Postage Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (500)$ Rookery 4330 Travel & Tuition Increase to account for actual costs incurred 2,000$ Rookery 4361 Insurance General liability, property, and excess liability insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-9%. An 8% increase has been assumed. (2,048)$ Rookery 4370 Uniforms Increase to account for actual costs incurred 2,500$ Rookery 4381 Electricity Increase to account for actual costs incurred 2,000$ Rookery 4382 Utilities Increase to account for actual costs incurred 4,000$ Rookery 4383 Heat Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (5,750)$ Rookery 4384 Sanitation Decrease to account for actual costs incurred (1,800)$ Rookery 4411 Cont Srvs - Fitness ProvDecrease in revenue share resulting from decrease in budgeted revenue for personal/specialty training and spinning classes (54,000)$ Rookery 4412 Cont Srvs - Programs Increase primarily due to Summer Camp contracted services 20,394$ Rookery 4418 Special Projects Decrease in Scholarship/Financial Aid funding as 2022 amount to start the Rookery Scholarship Program has gone unused (5,000)$ Rookery 4900 Marketing Increase to account for the spend of TCG Grant Funds 8,000$ Total Rookery Activity Center Fund 2025 Adjustments Requested (65,770)$ CITY OF LINO LAKES THE ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER FUND (202) 2025 BASE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 35 THE ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER (202-451)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 370,709 431,840 556,367 295,927 548,720 (85,746) 462,974 OVERTIME 4102-000 452 1,180 0 928 0 0 0 PART-TIME 4103-000 299,936 586,456 500,000 426,710 500,000 66,115 566,115 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 3,803 000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 0000000 PERA 4121-000 34,198 49,591 60,478 34,264 59,904 (12,443) 47,461 SOCIAL SECURITY 4122-000 49,593 76,136 80,812 54,520 80,227 (1,502) 78,725 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 1,015 000000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 40,365 45,931 58,057 29,762 51,159 (10,030) 41,129 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 903 1,134 1,495 725 1,477 (230) 1,247 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,569 2,756 4,287 1,838 4,373 (625) 3,748 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0 20,005 0 1,449 0 0 0 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 12,367 27,181 29,858 25,890 22,357 (413) 21,944 814,910 1,242,210 1,291,354 872,014 1,268,217 (44,874) 1,223,343 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 11,285 16,903 7,000 13,788 7,000 0 7,000 General and Office Supplies PROGRAM SUPPLIES 4205-000 4,753 11,820 24,062 9,261 24,062 2,338 26,400 See Program Budget Detail MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 22,735 30,141 44,300 21,571 44,300 (9,300) 35,000 Cleaning Supplies, Paper Products, Soap, Pool/Sauna Parts and Pumps, Water Filters, Air Filters, Paint and Hardware, Water Fountains, Miscellaneous Building Supplies CHEMICALS 4222-000 5,527 9,567 12,000 7,443 12,000 (2,000) 10,000 Pool Testing Supplies, Chlorine, Acid, Bicarbonate RESALE ITEMS 4235-000 139 990 2,500 104 2,500 (2,000) 500 Locks, Diapers, Swim Caps, Hair Ties, Socks SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 15,710 3,786 9,000 11,208 9,000 (3,000) 6,000 Tools, Equipment, and Furniture 60,149 73,206 98,862 63,374 98,862 (13,962) 84,900 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 30,887 68,000 10,000 10,794 10,000 20,000 30,000 Repair/Calibration of HVAC and Electrical Systems, Safety Systems Monitoring OTHER CONSULTANT 4310-000 4,204 52,193 59,000 49,036 59,000 4,170 63,170 Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support, CivicRec Annual Maintenance, WheniWork Scheduling Software TELEPHONE 4321-000 2,572 3,929 5,400 2,647 5,400 (900) 4,500 Emergency Phone Services, Cell Phone Stipends POSTAGE 4322-000 154 0 500 0 500 (500)0 TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 4,963 7,921 6,000 4,584 6,000 2,000 8,000 MRPA Annual Conference, Mileage Reimbursement, Professional Development/Training, Lifeguard & Instructor Certifications PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 597 420 00000 PAYMENT PROCESSING 4345-000 13,103 23,594 30,000 21,702 30,000 0 30,000 Credit Card and Healthy Contribution Processing Fees INSURANCE 4361-000 14,372 26,839 30,458 28,984 30,458 (2,048) 28,410 General Liability & Property Insurance UNIFORMS 4370-000 1,901 3,543 2,000 3,493 2,000 2,500 4,500 ELECTRICITY 4381-000 74,474 101,502 88,000 75,660 88,000 2,000 90,000 UTILITIES 4382-000 12,677 18,767 14,000 12,302 14,000 4,000 18,000 Water & Sewer Service HEAT 4383-000 30,434 40,703 55,750 27,068 55,750 (5,750) 50,000 SANITATION 4384-000 5,363 3,740 6,000 3,149 6,000 (1,800) 4,200 Refuse Collection 195,701 351,150 307,108 239,417 307,108 23,672 330,780 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 17,122 10,862 14,000 370 14,000 0 14,000 Copier Maintenance, Rug Service, Pest Control, Annual Inspections (Alarm, Elevator, Fire Extinguishers), Irrigation Service CONT SRVS - FITNESS PROVIDER 4411-000 162,802 157,684 214,980 120,970 214,980 (54,000) 160,980 Endurance Fitness Monthly Fee and Share of Program Revenue CONT SRVS - PROGRAMS 4412-000 2,635 10,013 6,350 22,410 6,350 20,394 26,744 See Program Budget Detail RENTAL EQUIPMENT 4415-000 0 682 00000 SPECIAL PROJECTS 4418-000 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 (5,000)0 Scholarship/Financial Aid SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 1,486 1,240 2,000 140 2,000 0 2,000 MRPA Membership, Pool Certification Fee MARKETING 4900-000 16,091 16,070 11,000 7,558 11,000 8,000 19,000 Includes Spending of TCG Grant Funds 205,136 196,551 253,330 151,449 253,330 (30,606) 222,724 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000 0000000 TOTAL ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER 1,275,896 1,863,117 1,950,654 1,326,254 1,927,517 (65,770) 1,861,747 CITY OF LINO LAKES 3 - 100% Activity Center Coordinator 100% HR Assistant100% Bldg Custodial/Maintenance Supervisor 100% Bldg Custodial/Maintenance Worker Part-time: Aquatics Fitness Instructor, Aquatics Lead, Child Watch Attendant, Custodial Worker, Guest Services Representative, Lifeguard, Manager On Duty, Recreation Attendant, Program Staff 36 Personal Contracted Program Revenue Services Supplies Services Total Net +/- Swim Lessons Winter Swim Lessons 43,311 27,960 400 - 28,360 14,951 Winter Monthly Programs 800 - - - - 800 Spring Swim Lessons 43,311 27,960 400 - 28,360 14,951 Spring Monthly Programs 700 - - - - 700 Summer Swim Lessons 43,311 27,960 300 - 28,260 15,051 Summer Monthly Programs - - - - - - Fall Swim Lessons 43,311 27,960 400 - 28,360 14,951 Fall Monthly Programs 1,100 - - - - 1,100 175,844 111,840 1,500 - 113,340 62,504 Youth Programs School Out Programs/Non School Day 6,000 2,000 800 - 2,800 3,200 Cheerleading 2,150 - - 1,896 1,896 254 Teen Take Over 200 50 150 - 200 - Santa Letters 210 - 150 - 150 60 Contracted Programs 1,000 - - 900 900 100 9,560 2,050 1,100 2,796 5,946 3,614 Gym Programs Adult Pickleball Lessons 2,160 1,920 200 - 2,120 40 Tot Time 1,680 - - - - 1,680 Kids Kraze 275 - - - - 275 Preschool Programs (Sports Sampler) 1,000 - - 900 900 100 Other Kids Sports 1,500 350 150 - 500 1,000 6,615 2,270 350 900 3,520 3,095 Aquatics Programs Aquatic Special Events 3,000 1,000 2,000 - 3,000 - Red Cross Certification 1,000 - - - - 1,000 Mermaiding 725 - - - - 725 4,725 1,000 2,000 - 3,000 1,725 Active Adult Programs AARP Classes 1,500 - - 1,200 1,200 300 Adult Day Trips 2,500 - 200 2,200 2,400 100 Lunch and Learn 500 - 200 - 200 300 Card Games - - 500 - 500 (500) 4,500 - 900 3,400 4,300 200 Community Programs CPR Training Classes 1,200 600 400 - 1,000 200 Valentine's Dance/Royal Ball 1,200 400 300 - 700 500 Egg Hunt 400 120 200 - 320 80 Wellness Fair 1,000 - 300 - 300 700 Bobbing for Pumpkins 1,000 300 650 - 950 50 Scarecrow Crawl - - 200 - 200 (200) Secret Holiday Shop 3,200 160 200 2,200 2,560 640 8,000 1,580 2,250 2,200 6,030 1,970 Birthday Parties - Birthday Parties 20,000 2,500 5,000 - 7,500 12,500 20,000 2,500 5,000 - 7,500 12,500 Summer Camps Summer Camp 67,000 38,000 6,500 13,000 57,500 9,500 Mini Summer Camp 31,000 17,000 4,000 3,500 24,500 6,500 Aquatics Camp 7,440 5,890 750 - 6,640 800 Summer Trips - Not Regular Camp 900 400 50 - 450 450 Ooey, Gooey and Ick Camp 7,000 2,300 2,000 - 4,300 2,700 Contracted Services Camp 1,080 - - 948 948 132 114,420 63,590 13,300 17,448 94,338 20,082 GRAND TOTALS 343,664 184,830 26,400 26,744 237,974 105,690 Expenditures CITY OF LINO LAKES THE ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER 2025 PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL 37 Fund Department Description Amount 401 Fire Fire Station #1 - Generator 52,000$ Fund 401 Total 52,000$ 402 Fleet #117 Tractor 206,000$ 402 Fleet #239 Bucket Truck 190,000 402 Fleet #251 Backhoe 170,000 402 Fleet #NEW Lawn Mower 18,500 402 Fire Extrication Sets (2)68,175 402 Fire Lift Bag (1)24,040 402 Fire LUCAS Chest Compression System 18,000 Fund 402 Total 694,715$ 403 Multiple Computer Replacements 15,300$ 403 Multiple Network Access Devices 15,000 Fund 403 Total 30,300$ 601 Water #505 Truck 41,000$ Fund 601 Total 41,000$ 602 Sewer #505 Truck 41,000$ 602 Sewer #NEW Vac/Jetter Combo Truck 650,000 602 Sewer Lift Station #53 Restoration 130,000 Fund 602 Total 821,000$ Grand Total 1,639,015$ City of Lino Lakes 2025 Citywide Capital Expenditures The 2025-2029 Financial Plan has two Capital Improvement Programs: Citywide and Community Development. Citywide capital expenditures are shown above, reviewed during the annual budget process, and approved when the plan is accepted by the City Council. Community Development projects are brought to Council as projects occur and may go through the competitive bidding process. Refer to the 2025-2029 Financial Plan for Community Development capital expenditure detail. 38 DEPARTMENT ACCT # NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Water 4200 Office Supplies Utility billing statement paper and envelopes; computer replacement 1,000$ Water 4215 Meters Increase frequency of meter and MXU upgrades 50,000$ Water 4300 Professional Services Addition of Tower Base Station with Analytics and Integration 137,500$ Water 4308 Auditor Account for 2024 actuals and 2025 projected 9.00% fee increase 1,000$ Water 4310 Other Consultants Customer Portal with support and integration 40,000$ Water 4310 Other Consultants Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support 10.00% fee increase 1,559$ Water 4310 Other Consultants BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - UB Module; increase from Springbrook annual maintenance 1,460$ Water 4310 Other Consultants Remainder of Springbrook Annual Maintenance - UB Module 2,275$ Water 4310 Other Consultants Meter reading software annual support 2,900$ Water 4322 Postage Increase due to cost of postage and increase in UB customers 2,000$ Water 4345 Payment Processing Credit Card Processing Fees - decrease to reflect passing fees onto the customer (13,000)$ Water 4360 Insurance General liability, property, and excess liability insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-9%. An 8% increase has been assumed. 5,987$ Water 4363 Auto Insurance Auto insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-10%. A 5% increase has been assumed. 347$ Water 4381 Electricity Increase in the cost of electricity for well house lighting and 10,000$ Water 4382 Utilities Increase in the cost of JPA utility service 1,000$ Water 4910 Operating Transfers Increase in Flat Water Charge transferred to Area and Unit Fund 166,940$ Water 4910 Operating Transfers Decrease in waters portion of the annual Street Rehabilitation Program (10,000)$ Water 5000 Capital Outlay Truck #505 Replacement (split 50/50 with Sewer)41,000$ Water 5000 Capital Outlay Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions 700,000$ Total Water Fund 2025 Adjustments Requested 1,141,968$ Sewer 4200 Office Supplies Utility billing statement paper and envelopes; computer replacement 1,000$ Sewer 4308 Auditor Account for 2024 actuals and 2025 projected 9.00% fee increase 1,770$ Sewer 4310 Other Consultants Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support 10.00% fee increase 1,559$ Sewer 4310 Other Consultants BS&A Software Annual Maintenance - UB Module; increase from Springbrook annual maintenance 1,460$ Sewer 4310 Other Consultants Remainder of Springbrook Annual Maintenance - UB Module 2,275$ Sewer 4322 Postage Increase due to cost of postage and increase in UB customers 2,000$ Sewer 4345 Payment Processing Credit Card Processing Fees - decrease to reflect passing fees onto the customer (13,000)$ Sewer 4360 Insurance General liability, property, and excess liability insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-9%. An 8% increase has been assumed. 2,481$ Sewer 4363 Auto Insurance Auto insurance premium. LMCIT suggests cities allow for possible rate increases in the range of 5-10%. A 5% increase has been assumed. 347$ Sewer 4381 Electricity Increase in the cost of electricity for well house lighting and 7,000$ Sewer 4382 Utilities Increase in the cost of JPA utility service 1,000$ Sewer 4383 Heat Increase in the cost of natural gas for on-site generators 400$ Sewer 4405 MCES Treatment ChargMet Council Municipal Wastewater Charge. The fee is based on the portion of wastewater flow discharged from the community to the regional system in the past year (2023) multiplied by the regional wastewater charge for the next year (2025). Year-to-year changes are affected by growth, water conservation, and inflow and infiltration. 53,817$ Sewer 4410 Contracted Services Sanitary Sewer Lining Project from Birch/West Shadow to Ware Road Lift Station ($700,000) 700,000$ Sewer 5000 Capital Outlay Truck #505 Replacement (split 50/50 with Sewer) 41,000$ Sewer 5000 Capital Outlay Vac/Jetter Combo Truck - new to fleet 650,000$ Sewer 5000 Capital Outlay Lift 53 Wetwell Rehab for I/I Reduction 130,000$ Total Sewer Fund 2025 Adjustments Requested 1,583,109$ CITY OF LINO LAKES ENTERPRISE FUNDS 2025 BASE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 39 DEPARTMENT ACCT # NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Storm Water 4304 Municipal Engineer Increase in retainer and project development services 2,550$ Storm Water 4330 Travel & Tuition Increase to account for actual costs incurred 1,300$ Storm Water 4360 Auto Insurance Street Sweeper covered under unscheduled mobile property (95)$ Total Storm Water Fund 2025 Adjustments Requested 3,755$ 40 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail Operating Revenue Penalties & Interest 601-000-3150-000 139 262 0 299 0 0 0 Water Hook-Up Charge 601-000-3248-000 37,030 30,000 41,250 23,750 41,250 0 41,250 Other Grants 601-000-3372-000 0 7,079 0 4,945 0 0 0 Water Meter Sales 601-000-3406-000 80,900 92,262 100,000 62,607 100,000 (15,000) 85,000 Irrigation Controller Sales 601-000-3407-000 3,690 3,850 5,000 2,880 5,000 0 5,000 Interest on Investments 601-000-3620-000 (246,188) 120,048 50,000 100,618 50,000 10,000 60,000 2.00% Interest Rate Assumption Change in Fair Value of Investments 601-000-3621-000 0 160,634 0 109,106 0 0 0 Included in Interest on Investments in 2022 Miscellaneous Revenue 601-000-3714-000 1,199 3,860 1,800 1,160 1,800 0 1,800 Contributions/Donations 601-000-3720-000 0 360 00000 Refunds and Reimbursements 601-000-3730-000 10,894 247 00000 Flat Water Charge 601-000-3850-000 288,630 435,329 601,760 446,070 601,760 166,940 768,700 Quarterly Base Fee - $5/quarter YoY Increase Water Sales 601-000-3855-000 1,389,467 1,711,197 1,450,533 811,304 1,450,533 88,241 1,538,774 Volume Charges - 4.0% YoY Increase Water Penalties 601-000-3858-000 33,363 45,779 34,000 34,325 34,000 6,000 40,000 Sale of Capital Assets 601-000-3910-000 0 977 00000 1,599,124 2,611,884 2,284,343 1,597,063 2,284,343 256,181 2,540,524 Other Sources Use of Reserves 00000529,308 529,308 00000529,308 529,308 Total Operating Revenue & Other Sources 1,599,124 2,611,884 2,284,343 1,597,063 2,284,343 785,489 3,069,832 CITY OF LINO LAKES WATER OPERATING FUND (601) 2025 ADOPTED BUDGET 41 WATER (601-494)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 228,337 238,194 298,975 197,256 321,162 0 321,162 OVERTIME 4102-000 6,928 5,764 7,000 3,005 7,000 0 7,000 ON CALL 4105-000 6,074 6,049 6,000 0 6,000 0 6,000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 3,755 4,813 9,880 9,227 9,880 0 9,880 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 99 72 72 0 72 0 72 PERA 4121-000 17,132 17,957 23,398 15,761 25,062 0 25,062 FICA/MEDICARE 4122-000 17,459 18,347 24,622 15,355 26,319 0 26,319 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 101 0 0 100000 PENSION EXPENSE 4125-000 15,190 16,77800000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 22,330 33,859 31,506 21,616 32,475 0 32,475 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 579 601 941 511 896 0 896 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,544 1,876 2,481 1,601 2,530 0 2,530 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0 3,256 0 4,686000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 7,391 6,769 10,503 9,240 8,456 0 8,456 326,919 354,334 415,378 278,357 439,852 0 439,852 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 1,348 3,304 2,500 5,275 2,500 1,000 3,500 Utility Billing Statement Paper and Envelopes, Computers, General Clerical Supplies MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 39,458 15,834 45,000 19,650 45,000 0 45,000 Fire Hydrants, Hydrant Hoses, Flushing Equipment, Gate Valves, Hardware for Repairs, Replacement Plumbing Supplies, Heaters, Dehumidifiers, Locate Paint and Flags, Gravel, Rock, Sand, Property Maintenance Supplies FUELS 4212-000 10,000 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 0 12,000 METERS 4215-000 116,959 63,817 150,000 172,165 150,000 50,000 200,000 New/Replacement Meters and MXU'S, Irrigation Meters, Meter Technology Upgrades $50,000 IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS 4216-000 19,799 29,878 20,000 0 20,000 0 20,000 CHEMICALS 4222-000 154,190 191,062 155,000 80,652 155,000 0 155,000 Polyphosphate, Fluoride, Chlorine, Chemical Pumps, Chemical Containment, Reagents for Water Sampling SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 3,603 1,746 2,500 980 2,500 0 2,500 Wrenches, Drills, Saws 345,357 317,642 387,000 278,722 387,000 51,000 438,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 120,528 130,226 103,300 44,165 103,300 137,500 240,800 Water Main Breaks, Well/Tower Maintenance, Scada Maintenance/Upgrades, Fire Hydrant Painting, RPZ Testing, Cartegraph, DNR Appropriations Permit, 2025 - Tower Base Station w/ Analytics & Integration $137,500 MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY 4301-000 5,691 108,811 5,000 22,447 5,000 0 5,000 MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 4304-000 20,346 32,640 25,000 9,940 25,000 0 25,000 AUDITOR 4308-000 0 6,761 7,000 7,361 7,000 1,000 8,000 Water Fund Portion of Independent Annual Audit OTHER CONSULTANT 4310-000 24,375 16,527 19,286 15,290 19,286 48,194 67,480 Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support, BS&A Software Annual Maintenance, Customer Portal & Support, Meter Software Annual Maintenance TELEPHONE 4321-000 3,700 3,881 5,000 3,662 5,000 0 5,000 Cellular Phones, Well House Land Line Back-up POSTAGE 4322-000 5,075 6,407 6,000 5,043 6,000 2,000 8,000 Utility Billing Postage TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 2,009 2,262 4,500 2,716 4,500 0 4,500 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 3,238 2,260 5,000 1,671 5,000 0 5,000 Water Quality Report PAYMENT PROCESSING 4345-000 11,303 13,492 13,000 9,346 13,000 (13,000) 0 INSURANCE 4360-000 16,303 26,107 27,078 28,319 27,078 5,987 33,065 AUTO INSURANCE 4363-000 951 954 953 1,042 953 347 1,300 UNIFORMS 4370-000 751 548 1,140 350 1,140 0 1,140 Clothing Allowance ELECTRICITY 4381-000 117,240 123,678 120,000 61,618 120,000 10,000 130,000 Well House Lighting and Pump Usage UTILITIES (WATER/SEWER) 4382-000 7,217 8,051 9,000 8,475 9,000 1,000 10,000 Blaine, Shoreview, and Centennial Utilities - Utility Connections HEAT 4383-000 2,952 2,759 5,000 2,361 5,000 0 5,000 Well House Heating 341,679 485,362 356,257 223,807 356,257 193,028 549,285 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 9,327 62,239 11,995 15,495 11,995 0 11,995 Gopher One-Call, Monthly Lab Testing, Utility Statement Processing RENTAL EQUIPMENT 4415-000 0 0 0 114000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 638 904 1,000 1,550 1,000 0 1,000 AWWA, Water Operators Licenses 9,965 63,143 12,995 17,159 12,995 0 12,995 DEPRECIATION ASSET DEPRECIATION 4510-000 789,106 796,58700000Annual Depreciation Expense - Water Infrastructure & Equip 789,106 796,58700000 OTHER OPERATING TRANSFERS 4910-000 573,283 954,910 731,760 0 731,760 156,940 888,700 Flat Water Charge Transferred to Area and Unit Fund ($768,700), Water Fund Portion of 2025 Street Rehabilitation ($120,000) 573,283 954,910 731,760 0 731,760 156,940 888,700 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 1,206,321 10,034 157,500 64,742 0 741,000 741,000 Truck #505 Replacement ($41,000), Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions ($700,000) 1,206,321 10,034 157,500 64,742 0 741,000 741,000 TOTAL WATER FUND 3,592,630 2,982,012 2,060,890 862,787 1,927,864 1,141,968 3,069,832 CITY OF LINO LAKES 5% Public Services Director10% Community Development Director 25% Public Works Superintendent5 - 50% General Maintenance Workers 20% Administrative Assistant7.5% Finance Director 12.5% Accounting Clerk II50% Accounting Clerk I 25% Office Specialist Temporaries: Seasonal Positions 42 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail Operating Revenue Current Assessments 602-000-3110-000 0000000 Delinquent Assessments 602-000-3120-000 0000000 Penalties & Interest 602-000-3150-000 139 274 0 318 0 0 0 Sewer Hook-Up Charge 602-000-3249-000 29,860 25,040 33,000 20,080 33,000 0 33,000 Other Grants 602-000-3372-000 0 51,953 00000 Interest on Investments 602-000-3620-000 (398,835) 198,596 80,000 134,818 80,000 (10,000) 70,000 2.00% Interest Rate Assumption Change in Fair Value of Investments 602-000-3621-000 0 231,133 0 143,811 0 0 0 Included in Interest on Investments in 2022 Contributions/Donations 602-000-3720-000 0 8,185 00000 Refunds and Reimbursements 602-000-3730-000 22 0 0 602 0 0 0 Sewer Sales 602-000-3856-000 1,892,537 2,015,484 1,979,432 1,572,742 1,979,432 92,493 2,071,925 2.5% YoY Increase Sewer Penalties 602-000-3858-000 29,741 37,986 30,000 31,889 30,000 5,000 35,000 Sale of Capital Assets 602-000-3910-000 0 977 00000 Operating Transfers 602-000-3920-000 0000000 1,553,464 2,569,626 2,122,432 1,904,259 2,122,432 87,493 2,209,925 Other Sources 0 Use of Reserves 0 0 275,833 0 0 1,635,827 1,635,827 0 0 275,833 0 0 1,635,827 1,635,827 Total Operating Revenue & Other Sources 1,553,464 2,569,626 2,398,265 1,904,259 2,122,432 1,723,320 3,845,752 CITY OF LINO LAKES SEWER OPERATING FUND (602) 2025 ADOPTED BUDGET 43 SEWER (602-495)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 228,338 238,194 298,975 197,256 321,162 0 321,162 OVERTIME 4102-000 6,928 5,763 7,000 3,004 7,000 0 7,000 ON CALL 4105-000 6,074 6,049 6,000 0 6,000 0 6,000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 3,755 4,813 9,880 9,227 9,880 0 9,880 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 99 72 72 0 72 0 72 PERA 4121-000 17,133 17,957 23,398 15,761 25,062 0 25,062 FICA/MEDICARE 4122-000 17,459 18,346 24,622 15,355 26,319 0 26,319 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 101 0 0 100 0 0 0 PENSION EXPENSE 4125-000 15,190 16,778 00000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 22,330 33,859 31,506 21,616 32,475 0 32,475 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 578 600 941 510 896 0 896 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 1,544 1,876 2,481 1,601 2,530 0 2,530 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0 3,256 0 4,686 0 0 0 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 15,729 16,273 23,839 20,970 19,196 0 19,196 335,258 363,836 428,714 290,087 450,592 0 450,592 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 1,319 3,257 2,500 5,275 2,500 1,000 3,500 Utility Billing Statement Paper and Envelopes, Computers, General Clerical Supplies MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 54,204 7,666 45,000 3,548 45,000 0 45,000 Impellers, Screens, UPS, Heaters, Batteries, Manhole Repair Supplies, Check Valves, Gate Valves, Road Repair Materials FUELS 4212-000 10,000 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 0 12,000 SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 3,390 1,922 30,700 17,047 30,700 0 30,700 Valve Keys, Locators, Wrenches, Plumbing Tools, Lift Station Pump Replacements 68,913 24,845 90,200 25,870 90,200 1,000 91,200 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 116,948 164,039 185,300 135,782 185,300 0 185,300 Lift Station Cleaning, Lift Station Repairs/Upgrades, Sewer Line Cleaning/Camera, Sycom, Generator Maintenance/Inspection, Pump Repair/Service, Sewer Line Breaks, Cartegraph MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY 4301-000 0000000 MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 4304-000 18,278 15,918 25,000 9,512 25,000 0 25,000 AUDITOR 4308-000 0 10,366 10,000 10,797 10,000 1,770 11,770 Sewer Fund Portion of Independent Annual Audit OTHER CONSULTANTS 4310-000 24,375 16,527 19,286 15,290 19,286 5,294 24,580 Metro-INET Services, Programs & Support, BS&A Software Annual Maintenance TELEPHONE 4321-000 1,789 1,412 2,000 1,010 2,000 0 2,000 Cellular Phones, Lift Stations POSTAGE 4322-000 5,075 6,183 6,000 3,484 6,000 2,000 8,000 Utility Billing Postage TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 2,701 2,828 4,500 2,277 4,500 0 4,500 OSHA Compliance Safety Training PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 0 0 500 0 500 0 500 PAYMENT PROCESSING 4345-000 11,303 13,492 13,000 9,346 13,000 (13,000)0 INSURANCE 4360-000 19,454 25,587 28,634 28,715 28,634 2,481 31,115 AUTO INSURANCE 4363-000 951 954 953 1,042 953 347 1,300 UNIFORMS 4370-000 751 548 1,140 350 1,140 0 1,140 Clothing Allowance ELECTRICITY 4381-000 36,256 36,841 38,000 23,680 38,000 7,000 45,000 Power to Run Lift Station Pumps and Controls UTILITIES (WATER/SEWER) 4382-000 12,834 11,276 12,000 8,442 12,000 1,000 13,000 Blaine, Shoreview, and Centennial Utilities - Utility Connections HEAT 4383-000 1,898 1,951 1,800 1,469 1,800 400 2,200 Natural Gas for On-site Generators 252,613 307,921 348,113 251,196 348,113 7,292 355,405 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MCES TREATMENT CHARGES 4405-000 1,087,739 1,165,548 1,291,178 1,075,982 1,291,178 53,817 1,344,995 MCES Sewer Treatment Costs CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 5,063 60,778 81,560 10,762 81,560 700,000 781,560 Gopher One-Call, Utility Statement Processing, Sanitary Sewer Lining Project ($75,000), 2025 - Sanitary Sewer Lining Project from Birch/West Shadow to Ware Road Lift Station ($700,000) RENTED EQUIPMENT 4415-000 0 321 00000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 243 886 1,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 Sewer Operators Licenses, APWA Membership 1,093,045 1,227,534 1,373,738 1,086,744 1,373,738 753,817 2,127,555 DEPRECIATION ASSET DEPRECIATION 4510-000 597,713 611,106 00000Annual Depreciation Expense - Sewer Infrastructure & Equip 597,713 611,106 00000 OTHER OPERATING TRANSFERS 4910-000 0 134,474 00000 0 134,474 00000 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0 0 157,500 64,742 0 821,000 821,000 Truck #505 Replacement ($41,000), Vac/Jetter Combo Truck ($650,000), Lift 53 Wetwell Rehab for I/I Reduction $130,000 0 0 157,500 64,742 0 821,000 821,000 TOTAL SEWER FUND 2,347,542 2,669,715 2,398,265 1,718,640 2,262,643 1,583,109 3,845,752 CITY OF LINO LAKES 5% Public Services Director 10% Community Development Director 25% Public Works Superintendent 5 - 50% General Maintenance Workers 20% Administrative Assistant 7.5% Finance Director 12.5% Accounting Clerk II 50% Accounting Clerk I 25% Office Specialist Temporaries: Seasonal Positions 44 September Base Adjustments Account Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Number 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail Operating Revenue Penalties & Interest 603-000-3150-000 0 48 0 81 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 603-000-3620-000 (895) 7,794 3,000 8,014 3,000 0 3,000 2.00% Interest Rate Assumption Change in Fair Value of Investments 603-000-3621-000 0 9,805 0 9,880 0 0 0 Included in Interest on Investments in 2022 Storm Water Penalties 603-000-3858-000 5,342 11,569 10,000 8,359 10,000 0 10,000 Storm Water Fee 603-000-3859-000 480,727 540,504 536,470 429,027 536,470 5,070 541,540 485,174 569,720 549,470 455,360 549,470 5,070 554,540 Other Sources 0 Use of Reserves 0000000 Operating Transfers 76,620 000000 76,620 000000 Total Operating Revenue & Other Sources 561,794 569,720 549,470 455,360 549,470 5,070 554,540 CITY OF LINO LAKES STORM WATER OPERATING FUND (603) 2025 ADOPTED BUDGET 45 STORM WATER (603-496)September Base Adjustments Object Actual Actual Adopted YTD Budget Requested Adopted Description Code 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 Budget Detail PERSONAL SERVICES SALARIES 4101-000 124,652 103,156 150,060 110,605 161,468 0 161,468 OVERTIME 4102-000 2,772 2,074 0 721 3,000 0 3,000 ON CALL 4105-000 0000000 TEMPORARIES 4106-000 0000000 WELLNESS PROGRAM 4108-000 72 72 72 0 72 0 72 PERA 4121-000 7,515 7,752 11,255 8,422 12,335 0 12,335 FICA/MEDICARE 4122-000 9,582 7,774 11,480 8,065 12,582 0 12,582 DEFERRED COMP EMPLOYER 4123-000 101 0 0 100 0 0 0 PENSION EXPENSE 4125-000 6,663 6,576 00000 HEALTH INSURANCE 4131-000 6,393 25,926 12,789 8,988 10,336 0 10,336 LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE 4133-000 254 239 465 275 398 0 398 DENTAL INSURANCE 4134-000 387 347 1,102 630 1,124 0 1,124 REEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 4141-000 0000000 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 4151-000 6,596 7,720 12,138 10,858 10,378 0 10,378 164,987 161,636 199,361 148,663 211,693 0 211,693 SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 4200-000 0000000 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4211-000 11,467 0 17,000 1,611 17,000 0 17,000 FUELS 4212-000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 4,000 0 4,000 SMALL TOOLS 4240-000 0 413 3,000 43 3,000 0 3,000 15,467 4,413 24,000 1,654 24,000 0 24,000 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4300-000 0 0 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 Public Education, Consultant Services MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 4304-000 32,780 56,522 37,000 16,785 37,000 2,550 39,550 Retainer ($14,550), Project Development ($25,000) OTHER CONSULTANTS 4310-000 8,551 000000 TELEPHONE 4321-000 17 18 20 14 20 0 20 Allocated Cell Phone Stipend POSTAGE 4322-000 764 841 955 868 955 0 955 Annual Utility Billing Postage TRAVEL & TUITION 4330-000 1,712 1,990 1,700 2,954 1,700 1,300 3,000 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4340-000 0000000 PAYMENT PROCESSING 4345-000 0000000 INSURANCE 4360-000 14 60 95 62 95 (95) 0 Mobile Property Insurance AUTO INSURANCE 4363-000 0000000 UNIFORMS 4370-000 114 0 380 0 380 0 380 Uniform Allowance ELECTRICITY 4381-000 0000000 UTILITIES (WATER/SEWER) 4382-000 348 000000 HEAT 4383-000 0000000 44,300 59,431 45,150 20,682 45,150 3,755 48,905 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTED SERVICES 4410-000 26,383 351,136 227,000 72,866 227,000 0 227,000 Sweeping/Repairs, Tree Removal, SWMP (Ditch, Pipe, Pond) Cleaning, Annual Utility Statement Processing ($300) RENTED EQUIPMENT 4415-000 0 422 00000 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 4452-000 340 365 500 362 500 0 500 26,723 351,923 227,500 73,229 227,500 0 227,500 DEPRECIATION ASSET DEPRECIATION 4510-000 0000000 0000000 OTHER OPERATING TRANSFERS 4910-000 0000000 0000000 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT 5000-000 0000000Capital Equipment Reserve 0000000 TOTAL STORM WATER FUND 251,477 577,403 496,011 244,228 508,343 3,755 512,098 CITY OF LINO LAKES 5% Public Services Director 10% Community Development Director 10% Public Works Superintendent 30% Streets Supervisor 25% Environmental Coordinator 1 - 100% General Maintenance Worker 46 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: 2025-2029 Financial Plan VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The City Council will hold a public hearing on the 2025-2029 Financial Plan. The Plan is a guiding document and is updated on an annual basis. BACKGROUND The City Council reviewed drafts of the 2025-2029 Financial Plan during each budget work session and most recently at the November 4, 2024 Work Session. The Plan was prepared by staff in compliance to and in accordance with the Lino Lakes City Charter Section 7.05. The Transmittal Letter on page 3 gives a full overview of the Plan. The Financial Section of the Plan focuses on all city funds, while the Capital Improvement Program (including Appendix A and B) focuses on the capital project and enterprise funds. The Project Detail in Appendix A appears in the following order: 1. Project Type 2. Project Year 3. Project Name There are two specific programs within the Capital Improvement Program, Community Development and Citywide. Community Development projects are individually approved by Council through the competitive bidding process while Citywide projects are approved as part of the budgeting process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 24-169, Accepting the 2025-2029 Financial Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-169 2. 2025-2029 Financial Plan CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-169 ACCEPTING THE 2025-2029 FINANCIAL PLAN WHEREAS, a Five-Year Financial Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Lino Lakes City Charter Section 7.05; and WHEREAS, the Financial Plan is a guiding document to be used for decision making; and WHEREAS, projects and financing sources outlined in the Financial Plan are not authorized until approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: 1. A public hearing was held on the 2025-2029 Financial Plan. 2. The 2025-2029 Financial Plan is accepted as presented. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED all 2025 Citywide projects have been reviewed during the budget process and are approved as presented in the Plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 2025 – 2029 FINANCIAL PLAN Accepted December 9, 2024 1 Table of Contents Transmittal Letter……………………………………………………........3 Financial Section………………………………………………………….9 Tax Summary…………………………………………………………………………….10 Cash Balance Summary………………………………………………………………...11 Debt Summary……………………………………………………………………………12 Transfers Summary…………………………………………………………………...…13 Capital Improvement Program Section……………………………….14 Overview………………………………………………………………………………….15 Department Summary…………………………………………………………….……. 16 Funding Summary…………………………………………………………………….… 17 Projects by Funding………………………………………………………………………18 Projects by Program……………………………………………………………………...21 Projects by Type…………………………………………………………………………. 23 Appendix A……………………………………………………..…………. 26 Project Detail Appendix B……………………………………………………..…………. 137 Projected Cash Balances by Fund (Capital Project and Enterprise Funds) 2 December 9, 2024 Honorable Mayor Members of the City Council City of Lino Lakes Introduction The 2025-2029 Financial Plan (the Plan) has been prepared by Management to give a five-year financial outlook for the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the City). The Plan includes assumptions to project operations, capital, and debt over the next five years to continue to maintain essential services and programs including: Public safety (police and fire services) Street maintenance and construction Park maintenance and improvements Community and economic development Rookery Activity Center operations Capital equipment replacement Capital infrastructure debt service repayment The Plan is just that, a plan. Adoption of the Plan does not signify approval of the assumptions represented in the following pages. The Plan is intended to be used as a guiding document for decision making. It allows the City to see the bigger picture in order to manage limited resources and achieve its goals. Key Highlights The tax levy is projected to increase from $15.6 million to $21.5 million over the duration of the Plan. The tax rate is projected to increase from 39.065% in 2025 to 45.487% in 2029. The tax rate increase can be attributed to: Minimal increase in tax capacity for taxes payable 2026. Annual increases to the Capital Equipment Replacement (Fund 402) operating tax levy to continue pay-as-you-go funding for the replacement and addition of equipment and vehicles. Annual increases to the Park & Trail Improvements (Fund 425) operating tax levy to replace and upgrade current park and trail system assets. 3 Annual increases to the Pavement Management (Fund 421) operating tax levy to complete street preservation projects to maintain a target street condition rating. Addition of a debt service tax levy for the 2024/2025 Street Reconstruction Project. Addition of a debt service tax levy for the 2027 Street Reconstruction Project. A pay-as-you-go methodology was applied to the capital needs in the Plan. Tax levies were increased to support future capital needs and to avoid issuance of debt in future years. To provide stabilization in the tax rate and utility rates, however, debt was modeled into the plan: 2024/2025 Street Reconstruction ($4,575,000 issued in 2025) o 15-year obligation at 4.00% interest to be paid back by a debt service tax levy Otter Lake Road Extension ($8,692,500 issued in 2025) o 20-year obligation at 3.00% interest to be paid back by Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406), Municipal State Aid (420), and Surface Water Management (422) revenues Public Works Facility ($13,600,000 issued in 2026) o 20-year obligation at 3.00% interest to be paid back by Antenna Lease Revenues within the Building and Facilities Fund (401), Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) revenues, and Water & Sewer User Fees 2027 Street Reconstruction ($4,450,500 issued in 2027) o 15-year obligation at 3.00% interest to be paid back by a debt service tax levy West Side Relief Sewer ($3,891,600 issued in 2027) o 15-year obligation at 3.00% interest to be paid back by Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) revenues Construction of a new Public Works Facility has been discussed by the City Council for many years and the Plan includes the project in 2026. Dollars are requested in 2025 from Building and Facilities Fund reserves for initial project development and feasibility studies. The current cost estimate and funding allocation developed by Management do not result in a tax levy impact due to annual revenue sources available for debt service repayment within each funding source. If the City wishes to move forward with this project the cost estimate and funding allocation, along with if the tax levy is impacted, will need to continue to be refined. Assumptions The assumptions developed by Management are conservative and will continue to be evaluated on an annual basis. Residential development is estimated at 160 homes per year while no commercial development is estimated in the Plan. The value and timing of commercial/industrial is difficult to predict and thus any additional tax capacity brought by non-residential properties will further bring down the projected tax rate. 4 Additional high-level assumptions built in to the Financial Section are as follows:  3.00% annual tax capacity growth rate o The tax capacity growth rate for taxes payable 2026 has been lowered to 0.50%, excluding new construction, based on indications from Anoka County o The average increase in tax capacity over the last eight years has been 10.00%, which includes new construction  $396,400 estimated market value of the average value residential home o Value from Anoka County for taxes payable 2025  1.00% interest earnings on ending cash balances  Tax Increment Financing (T.I.F) revenues for certified T.I.F districts as of 8/31/2024 include: o T.I.F District 1-11 Legacy at Woods Edge Development o T.I.F District 1-13 Lyngblomsten Senior Housing Project  General Fund o 5.00% annual increase in expenditures o 3.00% annual increase in non-tax levy revenue o Balanced budget with property taxes o No planned use of reserves/fund balance  Fund balance in 2029 is estimated at 47.00% of expenditures which is consistent with the current Fund Balance Policy  Special Revenue Funds o Rookery Activity Center  2023 was the first full fiscal year of operation  4.00% annual increase in expenditures  5.00% annual increase in non-tax levy revenue  Continuation of $600,000 operating tax levy o Other special revenue funds  Recurring revenue and expenditures have been projected. The projected cash balance can be used as a guide on how unanticipated revenue and expenditures would affect the fund.  Debt Service Funds o Current outstanding bonded indebtedness is forecasted based on debt service schedules and pledged revenue outlined in the bond documents. Capital Project Funds Appendix B incorporates the Capital Improvement Program into Projected Cash Balance statements for each capital project fund. The ending cash balance for each fiscal year, by fund, is also carried forward and represented on the Cash Balance Summary within the Financial Section of the Plan. Specific assumptions and details surrounding each capital project fund are as follows: 5  Fund 401, Building and Facilities, accounts for the maintenance and construction of municipal buildings and facilities. The main revenue source, charges for services, is cell tower antenna and ambulance lease revenue. The interfund loan activity represents payback from the T.I.F District 1-11 Fund (418) for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development. The interfund loan activity allows for fund reserves to be used as one of the funding sources for the Public Works Facility. Bond proceeds are projected in 2026 for the remainder of the Public Works Facility funding.  Fund 402, Capital Equipment Replacement, accounts for the purchase of capital equipment (including vehicles) for governmental functions, primarily Public Safety and Public Services. The main source of revenue is property taxes. To meet pay- as-you-go capital outlay needs, the tax levy is estimated to increase 20% annually until a $1,500,000 levy is reached in 2029. The specific property tax levy for the fire water tenders funds the annual principal and interest on an interfund loan from the Sewer Fund. Finally, proceeds from the sale of capital assets is assumed at 10.00% of the previous year’s capital outlay expenditures.  Fund 403, Office Equipment Replacement, accounts for the purchase of office equipment for governmental functions. The equipment is non-capital in nature (the City’s capital asset threshold for equipment is $10,000) and is not individually detailed in the Capital Improvement Program. The annual tax levy funds council technology stipends, computer replacements, other equipment (monitors, printers, scanners, etc.), and network access devices.  Fund 405, Park Dedication, is a statutorily required fund. State law requires park dedication fees to be placed in a special fund. The fund may be used only for acquisition or improvement or parks and recreational facilities. It may not be used for their ongoing operation or maintenance. Park Dedication Fees are outlined in the City Fee Schedule. Outside of the Main Street Trail primarily funded through grants in 2026, no other revenue or expenditures have been assumed. As park dedication fees from future developments are collected, park plans will be developed.  Fund 406, Area & Unit Trunk, accounts for new sewer and water infrastructure. City Trunk Utility Connection Fees are outlined in the City Fee Schedule and are represented as special assessment revenue. Bond proceeds are projected for Otter Lake Road Extension in 2025, Public Works Facility in 2026, and West Side Relief Sewer in 2027. Current debt service payments are represented as transfers out to the respective debt service fund which make the principal and interest payments while future debt service is shown as debt service expenditures. Water utility base fees are transferred in from the Water Operating 6 Fund. Recent increases in the base fee are directly related to the Water Treatment Plant project to support the projected annual debt service payment.  Fund 418, T.I.F District 1-11 Legacy at Woods Edge Development, accounts for tax increment revenues collected within the district. The district was certified in 2005 and will decertify by 2031. The tax increment will pay off the interfund loan from the Building and Facilities Fund (401) for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development by 2026 and in the same fiscal year start paying off an interfund loan from the Sewer Fund (602) for the same development. The interfund loan from the Sewer Fund is projected to be paid off in 2027.  Fund 419, T.I.F District 1-12 Clearwater Creek Business Park, accounts for the tax increment revenues collected within the district. The district was certified in 2017 and decertified in 2024. The tax increment paid off a PAYGO Financing Note issued to Distribution Alternatives in 2017. The note was paid off in 2024 and the balance left in the fund is anticipated to be used for a future project.  Fund 420, Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction, accounts for the construction, repair and maintenance of MSA eligible city streets. Municipal State Aid grant dollars are assumed to be requested as eligible projects occur with a goal of getting the City’s total allotment each year. Bond proceeds are projected for Otter Lake Road Extension in 2025.  Fund 421, Pavement Management, accounts for street rehabilitation (not full depth reconstruction) of non-MSA eligible city streets. The fund is entirely funded with an operating tax levy. Water and sewer infrastructure repair and maintenance done in conjunction with street rehabilitation are paid for out of the respective enterprise fund(s).  Fund 422, Surface Water Management, accounts for new surface water infrastructure as well as wetland bank activity. Surface Water Management Fees are outlined in the City Fee Schedule and are collected in full as charges for services or collected over time as a special assessment. If the Wetland Bank No. 3 project moves forward, wetland credit sales will eventually be realized from that project, although no assumptions have been made regarding future wetland credit sales. Wetland Bank No. 3 is currently proposed to be funded with an interfund loan from the Sewer Fund (602). Bond proceeds are projected in 2025 for Otter Lake Road Extension.  Fund 423, Street Reconstruction, accounts for street reconstruction of non-MSA eligible city streets. Street reconstruction projects are completed every 3 years and funded with bond proceeds. A new capital project fund is created for each 7 project to track the expenditure of bond proceeds. These funds are available to supplement bond proceeds or other funding sources.  Fund 425, Park & Trail Improvements, accounts for the improvement of current city parks and trails. The fund is entirely funded with an operating tax levy. To provide for additional funding the tax levy was doubled in 2025 and is assumed to increase by 40.00% starting in 2027 until a $500,000 tax levy is reached in 2029. The Park Board makes project recommendations to the City Council once funding is available.  Fund 430, T.I.F District 1-13 Lyngblomsten Senior Housing Project, accounts for the tax increment revenues collected within the district. The district was certified in 2022 and will decertify by 2047. The tax increment pays off a PAYGO Financing Note issued to Lyngblomsten in 2024.  Fund 484, Comp Plan Updates, accounts for the resources needed to update the City’s comprehensive plan every 10 years. Unused Planning and Zoning dollars from the General Fund (101) are transferred to this fund on an annual basis. Work on the 2050 Comprehensive Plan will begin in 2027. Enterprise Funds The City operates water, sewer, and storm water utilities each accounted for in a separate enterprise fund. Utility rates are charged as outlined in the City Fee Schedule. Each fund has been recently analyzed in a utility rate or feasibility study and the revenue and current expenditure assumptions from those studies have been represented on the Projected Cash Balance statements along with capital outlay expenditures from the Capital Improvement Program. The ending cash balance for each fiscal year, by fund, is also carried forward and represented on the Cash Balance Summary within the Financial Section of the Plan. Conclusion The Plan is a work in progress and must be reviewed and revised in order to stay viable. While it is a guide, it does portray an overview of what the financial needs of the City are anticipated to be over the five years presented. As conditions change, the City must accommodate such changes. Actual performance will vary from the results modeled in the Plan. Respectfully submitted, Hannah Lynch Finance Director 8 FINANCIAL SECTION 9 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Operating Levy 101 General Fund 11,323,814$ 12,506,548$ 13,188,041$ 13,905,294$ 14,660,146$ 202 Rookery Activity Center 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 205 Blue Heron Days 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 402 Capital Equipment Replacement 810,000 972,000 1,166,400 1,399,680 1,500,000 402 Capital Fire Water Tender Replacement 221,565 219,533 217,500 215,467 213,435 403 Office Equipment Replacement 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 421 Pavement Management 1,138,500 1,309,300 1,505,700 1,731,500 1,991,225 425 Park & Trail Improvements 180,000 180,000 252,000 352,800 500,000 Total Operating Levy 14,308,879 15,822,381 16,964,641 18,239,741 19,499,806 Annual % Change 11%11%7%8%7% Debt Levy 338 2015A G.O. Bonds 216,182 269,798 222,364 222,626 222,758 338 2015A G.O. Bonds - Abatement Portion 53,682 - - - - 339 2015 EDA Lease Revenue Bonds 318,557 317,192 315,669 319,239 317,244 344 2018A G.O. Bond 484,215 482,640 485,527 482,114 480,644 346 2021A G.O. Bond 209,575 211,150 207,370 208,840 211,570 New 2024/2025 Street Reconstruction Funding - 438,699 438,115 438,839 434,049 New 2027 Street Reconstruction Funding - - - 391,443 391,443 Total Debt Levy 1,282,211 1,719,479 1,669,045 2,063,101 2,057,708 Annual % Change 0%34%-3%24%0% Total Tax Levy 15,591,090 17,541,860 18,633,686 20,302,842 21,557,514 Less: Fiscal Disparities Distribution (1,460,414) (1,627,875) (1,851,605) (1,920,097) (2,042,561) Net Tax Levy 14,130,676 15,913,985 16,782,081 18,382,745 19,514,953 Annual % Change 10%13%5%10%6% 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Tax Capacity Personal and Real Estate 39,533,445$ 39,731,112$ 40,923,046$ 42,150,737$ 43,415,259$ Assumed New Growth - Residential - 620,298 1,282,283 1,987,831 2,738,892 Assumed New Growth - Commercial - - - - - Total Tax Capacity 39,533,445 40,351,410 42,205,329 44,138,568 46,154,151 Less: Fiscal Disparities Contribution (2,342,867) (2,413,153) (2,485,548) (2,560,114) (2,636,917) Less: Tax Increment Captured Value (1,017,937) (1,048,475) (1,079,929) (597,184) (615,100) Net Tax Capacity 36,172,641 36,889,782 38,639,852 40,981,269 42,902,134 1%2%5%6%5% 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 City Tax Rate 39.065% 43.139% 43.432% 44.856% 45.487% City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Tax Levy Summary Tax Capacity Summary Tax Rate Summary 10 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 General Fund 101 General Fund 8,333,880$ 8,333,880$ 8,333,880$ 8,333,880$ 8,333,880$ Special Revenue Funds 202 Rookery Activity Center 84,221 148,043 205,016 255,469 299,789 203 Economic Development Authority 252,206 254,729 257,276 259,849 262,447 204 Cable TV & Communications 306,011 342,072 378,492 415,277 452,430 205 Blue Heron Days 5,553 5,609 5,665 5,722 5,779 207 State Narcotics Forfeiture 32,326 32,649 32,976 33,305 33,639 208 DUI Forfeitures 54,441 54,985 55,535 56,090 56,651 209 Other Forfeitures 1,528 1,543 1,559 1,574 1,590 210 Federal Forfeiture - Treasury 7,832 7,910 7,989 8,069 8,150 211 K9 Unit 9,008 7,098 5,169 3,221 1,253 214 Public Safety Aid 336,666 340,033 343,433 346,867 350,336 Debt Service Funds 301 Closed Bond 326,446 534,455 534,800 535,148 535,499 337 2014A G.O. Bonds 243,710 - - - - 338 2015A G.O. Bonds 734,331 755,991 730,552 750,083 769,754 339 2015 EDA Lease Revenue Bonds 420,251 440,408 460,619 486,127 506,645 341 2016A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 268,463 270,148 - - - 344 2018A G.O. Bonds 1,470,051 1,373,063 1,275,620 1,172,667 1,061,941 345 2020A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 232,160 233,482 234,817 236,165 237,527 346 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 231,974 246,599 256,139 270,846 288,929 Capital Project Funds 401 Building and Facilities 2,660,828 790,332 768,423 758,576 755,634 402 Capital Equipment Replacement 563,353 301,658 107,655 825,241 1,386,054 403 Office Equipment Replacement 50,395 50,749 57,206 68,228 78,610 405 Park Dedication 744,462 544,907 550,356 555,860 561,418 406 Area & Unit Trunk 6,515,466 5,749,888 4,942,251 3,671,567 3,382,416 418 T.I.F District 1-11 - - - - - (1) 419 T.I.F District 1-12 406,104 406,165 406,226 406,289 406,351 420 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction 5,045,068 5,690,976 5,219,705 5,838,114 6,480,294 421 Pavement Management 174,326 176,069 177,830 179,608 181,404 422 Surface Water Management 1,452,240 1,122,190 832,003 438,631 159,037 423 Street Reconstruction 482,464 488,028 492,908 497,837 502,816 425 Park & Trail Improvements 239,755 422,152 678,374 1,037,958 1,548,337 430 T.I.F District 1-13 35,282 56,269 77,959 100,368 123,513 484 Comp Plan Updates 68,622 94,308 (3,749) 1,214 6,226 Enterprise Funds 601 Water Operating 5,146,930 5,364,276 5,158,816 5,069,359 5,238,833 602 Sewer Operating 2,702,413 3,306,510 3,875,930 3,945,841 4,010,736 603 Storm Water Operating 390,100 100,760 125,383 141,634 148,939 Total Cash Balance, December 31 40,028,866$ 38,047,935$ 36,586,813$ 36,706,684$ 38,176,859$ (1) Cash balance at December 31 is zero, although the fund is shown due to financial activity identified prior to December 31. City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Cash Balance Summary 11 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 337 2014A G.O. Bonds 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 338 2015A G.O. Bonds 1,245,000 1,020,000 790,000 600,000 405,000 339 2015 EDA Lease Revenue Bonds 2,705,000 2,495,000 2,280,000 2,060,000 1,830,000 341 2016A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 300,000 150,000 - - - 344 2018A G.O. Bonds 4,770,000 4,305,000 3,815,000 3,300,000 2,760,000 345 2020A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 3,090,000 2,825,000 2,550,000 2,260,000 1,960,000 346 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 1,310,000 1,135,000 955,000 775,000 590,000 3XX 2024 G.O. Water Revenue Note (MN PFA) 15,647,000 14,959,000 14,257,000 13,541,000 12,812,000 * Total Current Debt 29,102,000$ 26,889,000$ 24,647,000$ 22,536,000$ 20,357,000$ New 2024/2025 Street Reconstruction Funding 4,575,000$ 4,390,000$ 4,145,000$ 3,890,000$ 3,630,000$ New 2025 Otter Lake Rd Extension Funding 8,692,500 8,369,002 8,035,800 7,692,601 7,339,107 New 2026 Public Works Facility Funding - 13,600,000 13,093,866 12,572,549 12,035,592 New 2027 Street Reconstruction Funding - - 4,450,500 4,211,212 3,964,745 New 2027 West Side Relief Sewer Funding - - 3,891,600 3,682,362 3,466,847 Total Future Debt 13,267,500$ 26,359,002$ 33,616,766$ 32,048,724$ 30,436,291$ Total Debt 42,369,500$ 53,248,002$ 58,263,766$ 54,584,724$ 50,793,291$ *The note was issued on 10/15/2024, although the disbursment and repayment schedules have yet to be determined. Current Debt Outstanding Future Debt Outstanding City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Debt Summary 12 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 301 Closed Bond -$ 209,745$ -$ -$ -$ 337 2014A G.O. Bonds 126,438 - - - - 341 2016A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 152,450 154,500 - - - 345 2020A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 344,500 344,100 343,300 347,000 345,200 406 Area & Unit Trunk 768,700 785,200 919,348 818,200 834,700 484 Comp Plan Updates 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Total Transfers In 1,417,088$ 1,518,545$ 1,287,648$ 1,190,200$ 1,204,900$ 101 General Fund 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 337 2014A G.O. Bonds - 209,745 - - - 341 2016A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds - - 117,648 - - 406 Area & Unit Trunk 623,388 498,600 343,300 347,000 345,200 601 Water Operating 768,700 785,200 801,700 818,200 834,700 Total Transfers Out 1,417,088$ 1,518,545$ 1,287,648$ 1,190,200$ 1,204,900$ Transfers In Transfers Out City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Transfers Summary 13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SECTION 14 City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Overview 21 18 15 12 11 10 7 552 111 # of Projects By Department 25 27 24 19 14 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 # of Projects By Year $41,375,515 $22,787,728 $19,231,595 $4,574,150 $3,781,225 $41,375,515 $22,787,728 $19,231,595 $4,574,150 $3,781,225 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Cost vs. Funding by Year Cost Funding 15 Department 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Administration/Finance 30,300$ 25,150$ 19,050$ 14,550$ 15,300$ 104,350$ Building Inspections -$ 33,000$ -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ Environmental -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ Fire 162,215$ 190,600$ 93,700$ 125,000$ 364,000$ 935,515$ Fleet 566,000$ 470,000$ 1,016,000$ 624,000$ 409,000$ 3,085,000$ Government Buildings 400,000$ 16,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16,400,000$ Parks 18,500$ 2,198,000$ 25,000$ 18,000$ -$ 2,259,500$ Police -$ 432,200$ 359,600$ 65,600$ 257,700$ 1,115,100$ Sewer 2,566,750$ 887,978$ 113,000$ 160,000$ 307,000$ 4,034,728$ Storm Water 3,960,000$ 746,000$ 381,000$ 494,500$ 370,000$ 5,951,500$ Streets 31,889,750$ 1,439,300$ 12,321,450$ 1,961,500$ 1,991,225$ 49,603,225$ Utilities 232,000$ -$ 3,891,600$ 1,111,000$ 67,000$ 5,301,600$ Water 1,550,000$ 310,500$ 1,011,195$ -$ -$ 2,871,695$ Total 41,375,515$ 22,787,728$ 19,231,595$ 4,574,150$ 3,781,225$ 91,750,213$ City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Department Summary 16 Type 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Anoka County 7,245,000$ 207,000$ 4,916,250$ -$ -$ 12,368,250$ Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406)4,508,750$ 4,103,038$ 4,902,795$ 1,035,000$ 60,000$ 14,609,583$ Assessments 258,750$ 190,440$ -$ -$ 124,000$ 573,190$ Bond Proceeds -$ -$ 4,450,500$ -$ -$ 4,450,500$ Building and Facilities Fund (401)452,000$ 6,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,852,000$ Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402)694,715$ 1,308,800$ 1,494,300$ 832,600$ 1,030,700$ 5,361,115$ Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) 5,892,500$ -$ 1,086,750$ -$ -$ 6,979,250$ Office Equipment Replacement Fund (403)30,300$ 25,150$ 19,050$ 14,550$ 15,300$ 104,350$ Other 13,985,000$ 1,656,000$ -$ -$ -$ 15,641,000$ Park Dedication Fund (405)-$ 207,000$ -$ -$ -$ 207,000$ Pavement Management Fund (421)1,138,500$ 1,309,300$ 1,505,700$ 1,731,500$ 1,991,225$ 7,676,225$ Sewer Operating Fund (602)1,521,000$ 3,305,000$ 113,000$ 198,000$ 156,500$ 5,293,500$ Storm Water Operating Fund (603)220,000$ 545,000$ 220,000$ 230,000$ 220,000$ 1,435,000$ Surface Water Management Fund (422)4,568,000$ 201,000$ 161,000$ 264,500$ 150,000$ 5,344,500$ Water Operating Fund (601)861,000$ 3,330,000$ 362,250$ 268,000$ 33,500$ 4,854,750$ Total 41,375,515$ 22,787,728$ 19,231,595$ 4,574,150$ 3,781,225$ 91,750,213$ City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Funding Summary 17 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Anoka County County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 7,245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,245,000$ CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Reconstruction -$ -$ 4,916,250$ -$ -$ 4,916,250$ Main Street Trail -$ 207,000$ -$ -$ -$ 207,000$ Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) Birch Sanitary Trunk Crossing Upgrade 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Gravity Sewer 77th to Country Lane Swr Distr 2B -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ Lake Drive Trunk Watermain -$ -$ 648,945$ -$ -$ 648,945$ Lift Station #10 Upgrade -$ 76,073$ -$ -$ -$ 76,073$ Lift Station and Forcemain -$ 326,025$ -$ -$ -$ 326,025$ Main Street Trunk Water Connection -$ -$ -$ 1,035,000$ -$ 1,035,000$ Market Place Dr Realignment 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Otter Lake Road Extension 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,000,000$ Public Works Facility -$ 3,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,200,000$ Robinson Drive Street and Utility Extension -$ -$ 362,250$ -$ -$ 362,250$ Sewer District 3H Trunk Improvements -$ 190,440$ -$ -$ -$ 190,440$ Trunk Sewer 258,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 258,750$ Well #7 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ Well #7 Raw Watermain to Water Treatment Pla -$ 310,500$ -$ -$ -$ 310,500$ West Side Relief Sewer to Lakeview Dr and sew -$ -$ 3,891,600$ -$ -$ 3,891,600$ Assessments County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 258,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 258,750$ Gravity Sewer 77th to Country Lane Swr Distr 2B -$ -$ -$ -$ 124,000$ 124,000$ Sewer District 3H Trunk Improvements -$ 190,440$ -$ -$ -$ 190,440$ Bond Proceeds 2027 Street Reconstruction Project -$ -$ 4,450,500$ -$ -$ 4,450,500$ Building and Facilities Fund (401) Fire Station #1 - Generator 52,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 52,000$ Public Works Facility 400,000$ 6,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,800,000$ Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) #117 Tractor 206,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 206,000$ #140 Tractor -$ 128,000$ -$ -$ -$ 128,000$ #210 Mack Truck -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ #215 Plow Truck -$ 345,000$ -$ -$ -$ 345,000$ #218 Plow Truck -$ -$ 358,000$ -$ -$ 358,000$ #225 Truck -$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ #239 Bucket Truck 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ #251 Backhoe 170,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 170,000$ #255 Truck -$ -$ 169,000$ -$ -$ 169,000$ #256 Truck - Asphalt Hotbox -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #259 Truck -$ -$ 67,000$ -$ -$ 67,000$ #262 Truck -$ -$ -$ 158,000$ -$ 158,000$ #263 Truck -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #267 Truck -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ #268 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 95,000$ 95,000$ #306 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #307 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 65,600$ -$ 65,600$ #308 CSO Vehicle -$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ 70,000$ #309 Investigation Vehicle -$ 60,100$ -$ -$ -$ 60,100$ #311 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #314 Marked Patrol Vehicle - Canine -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #318 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #319 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #320 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #321 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #322 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #323 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #328 Unmarked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Funding 18 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Funding #329 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #330 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #409 Lawn Mower Pull Behind -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ #411 RTV -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ -$ 18,000$ #412 Truck -$ -$ 72,000$ -$ -$ 72,000$ #416 Truck -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ -$ 82,000$ #417 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,000$ 68,000$ #418 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ #606 Truck -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ #607 Truck -$ -$ 93,700$ -$ -$ 93,700$ #623 Fire Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #803 Environmental Vehicle -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ #804 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ 33,000$ -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ #805 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ 32,000$ -$ -$ 32,000$ #806 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ 34,000$ #807 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 86,000$ 86,000$ #NEW Lawn Mower 18,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,500$ Extrication Sets (2)68,175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,175$ Gas/Electric Ventilation Fans (4)-$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Bag (1)24,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,040$ LUCAS Chest Compression System 18,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ Rescue Boat -$ 65,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ SCBA Cascade Trailer (1)-$ 20,900$ -$ -$ -$ 20,900$ Turnout Gear -$ -$ -$ -$ 364,000$ 364,000$ Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 1,035,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,035,000$ CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Reconstruction -$ -$ 258,750$ -$ -$ 258,750$ Market Place Dr Realignment 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ Otter Lake Road Extension 4,657,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,657,500$ Robinson Drive Street and Utility Extension -$ -$ 828,000$ -$ -$ 828,000$ Office Equipment Replacement Fund (403) Computer Replacements 15,300$ 14,650$ 13,050$ 14,550$ 15,300$ 72,850$ Network Access Devices 15,000$ 10,500$ 6,000$ -$ -$ 31,500$ Other County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 12,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,400,000$ Main Street Trail -$ 1,656,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,656,000$ Market Place Dr Realignment 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ Shenandoah Park Surface Water BMP 207,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 207,000$ Trunk Sewer 828,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 828,000$ Park Dedication Fund (405) Main Street Trail -$ 207,000$ -$ -$ -$ 207,000$ Pavement Management Fund (421) 2025 Street Rehabilitation Program 1,138,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,138,500$ 2026 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ 1,309,300$ -$ -$ -$ 1,309,300$ 2027 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ 1,505,700$ -$ -$ 1,505,700$ 2028 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ 1,731,500$ -$ 1,731,500$ 2029 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,991,225$ 1,991,225$ Sewer Operating Fund (602) #505 Truck 41,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,000$ #506 Truck -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ -$ 33,000$ #507 Mower -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ -$ 5,000$ #508 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 33,500$ 33,500$ #NEW Vac/Jetter Combo Truck 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000$ 2025 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 2026 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 2027 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 2028 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ 75,000$ 2029 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 19 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Funding Generator Lift Station #5 -$ -$ -$ -$ 48,000$ 48,000$ Lift Station #4 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ Lift Station #53 - Generator -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #53 Restoration 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130,000$ Lift Station #6 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #6 - Pumps -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ 15,000$ Lift Station #9 - Pumps -$ -$ 13,000$ -$ -$ 13,000$ Public Works Facility -$ 3,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,200,000$ Storm Water Operating Fund (603) #252 Street Sweeper -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ 2025 Surface Water Management Project 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2026 Surface Water Management Project -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2027 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2028 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ -$ 230,000$ 2029 Surface Water Management Project.-$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 220,000$ Surface Water Management Fund (422) 2026 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ 103,500$ -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ 2028 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ -$ 103,500$ Otter Lake Road Extension 1,035,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,035,000$ Shenandoah Park Surface Water BMP 207,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 207,000$ Wetland Bank #3 3,326,000$ 97,500$ 161,000$ 161,000$ 150,000$ 3,895,500$ Water Operating Fund (601) #505 Truck 41,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,000$ #506 Truck -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ -$ 33,000$ #507 Mower -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ -$ 5,000$ #508 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 33,500$ 33,500$ 2025 Street Rehabilitation Program 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ 2026 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ 130,000$ 2028 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ 130,000$ -$ 130,000$ Public Works Facility -$ 3,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,200,000$ Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ Well #3 Pumphouse Revisions -$ -$ 362,250$ -$ -$ 362,250$ Well No. 5 Rehab -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ Total 41,375,515$ 22,787,728$ 19,231,595$ 4,574,150$ 3,781,225$ 91,750,213$ 20 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Citywide #117 Tractor 206,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 206,000$ #140 Tractor -$ 128,000$ -$ -$ -$ 128,000$ #210 Mack Truck -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ #215 Plow Truck -$ 345,000$ -$ -$ -$ 345,000$ #218 Plow Truck -$ -$ 358,000$ -$ -$ 358,000$ #225 Truck -$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ #239 Bucket Truck 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ #251 Backhoe 170,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 170,000$ #252 Street Sweeper -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ #255 Truck -$ -$ 169,000$ -$ -$ 169,000$ #256 Truck - Asphalt Hotbox -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #259 Truck -$ -$ 67,000$ -$ -$ 67,000$ #262 Truck -$ -$ -$ 158,000$ -$ 158,000$ #263 Truck -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #267 Truck -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ #268 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 95,000$ 95,000$ #306 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #307 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 65,600$ -$ 65,600$ #308 CSO Vehicle -$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ 70,000$ #309 Investigation Vehicle -$ 60,100$ -$ -$ -$ 60,100$ #311 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #314 Marked Patrol Vehicle - Canine -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #318 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #319 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #320 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #321 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #322 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #323 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #328 Unmarked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #329 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #330 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #409 Lawn Mower Pull Behind -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ #411 RTV -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ -$ 18,000$ #412 Truck -$ -$ 72,000$ -$ -$ 72,000$ #415 Ferris Mower 18,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,500$ #416 Truck -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ -$ 82,000$ #417 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,000$ 68,000$ #418 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ #505 Truck 82,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ #506 Truck -$ -$ -$ 66,000$ -$ 66,000$ #507 Mower -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ #508 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 67,000$ 67,000$ #606 Truck -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ #607 Truck -$ -$ 93,700$ -$ -$ 93,700$ #623 Fire Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #803 Environmental Vehicle -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ #804 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ 33,000$ -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ #805 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ 32,000$ -$ -$ 32,000$ #806 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ 34,000$ #807 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 86,000$ 86,000$ #NEW Vac/Jetter Combo Truck 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000$ Computer Replacements 15,300$ 14,650$ 13,050$ 14,550$ 15,300$ 72,850$ Extrication Sets (2)68,175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,175$ Fire Station #1 - Generator 52,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 52,000$ Gas/Electric Ventilation Fans (4)-$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Generator Lift Station #5 -$ -$ -$ -$ 48,000$ 48,000$ Lift Bag (1)24,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,040$ City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Program 21 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Program Lift Station #4 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ Lift Station #53 - Generator -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #53 Restoration 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130,000$ Lift Station #6 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #6 - Pumps -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ 15,000$ Lift Station #9 - Pumps -$ -$ 13,000$ -$ -$ 13,000$ LUCAS Chest Compression System 18,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ Network Access Devices 15,000$ 10,500$ 6,000$ -$ -$ 31,500$ Rescue Boat -$ 65,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ SCBA Cascade Trailer (1)-$ 20,900$ -$ -$ -$ 20,900$ Turnout Gear -$ -$ -$ -$ 364,000$ 364,000$ Community Development 2025 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 2025 Street Rehabilitation Program 1,258,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,258,500$ 2025 Surface Water Management Project 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2026 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 2026 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ 1,439,300$ -$ -$ -$ 1,439,300$ 2026 Surface Water Management Project -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2026 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ 103,500$ -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ 2027 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 2027 Street Reconstruction Project -$ -$ 4,450,500$ -$ -$ 4,450,500$ 2027 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ 1,505,700$ -$ -$ 1,505,700$ 2027 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2028 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ 75,000$ 2028 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ 1,861,500$ -$ 1,861,500$ 2028 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ -$ 230,000$ 2028 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ -$ 103,500$ 2029 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 2029 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,991,225$ 1,991,225$ 2029 Surface Water Management Project.-$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 220,000$ Birch Sanitary Trunk Crossing Upgrade 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 20,938,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,938,750$ CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Reconstruction -$ -$ 5,175,000$ -$ -$ 5,175,000$ Gravity Sewer 77th to Country Lane Swr Distr 2B -$ -$ -$ -$ 184,000$ 184,000$ Lake Drive Trunk Watermain -$ -$ 648,945$ -$ -$ 648,945$ Lift Station #10 Upgrade -$ 76,073$ -$ -$ -$ 76,073$ Lift Station and Forcemain -$ 326,025$ -$ -$ -$ 326,025$ Main Street Trail -$ 2,070,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,070,000$ Main Street Trunk Water Connection -$ -$ -$ 1,035,000$ -$ 1,035,000$ Market Place Dr Realignment 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Otter Lake Road Extension 8,692,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,692,500$ Public Works Facility 400,000$ 16,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16,400,000$ Robinson Drive Street and Utility Extension -$ -$ 1,190,250$ -$ -$ 1,190,250$ Sewer District 3H Trunk Improvements -$ 380,880$ -$ -$ -$ 380,880$ Shenandoah Park Surface Water BMP 414,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 414,000$ Trunk Sewer 1,086,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,086,750$ Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ Well #3 Pumphouse Revisions -$ -$ 362,250$ -$ -$ 362,250$ Well #7 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ Well #7 Raw Watermain to Water Treatment Pla -$ 310,500$ -$ -$ -$ 310,500$ Well No. 5 Rehab -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ West Side Relief Sewer to Lakeview Dr and sew -$ -$ 3,891,600$ -$ -$ 3,891,600$ Wetland Bank #3 3,326,000$ 97,500$ 161,000$ 161,000$ 150,000$ 3,895,500$ Total 41,375,515$ 22,787,728$ 19,231,595$ 4,574,150$ 3,781,225$ 91,750,213$ 22 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Buildings Public Works Facility 400,000$ 16,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16,400,000$ Machinery and Shop Equipment #117 Tractor 206,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 206,000$ #140 Tractor -$ 128,000$ -$ -$ -$ 128,000$ #210 Mack Truck -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ #251 Backhoe 170,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 170,000$ #252 Street Sweeper -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ #409 Lawn Mower Pull Behind -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ #411 RTV -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ -$ 18,000$ #507 Mower -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ #NEW Lawn Mower 18,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,500$ Generator Lift Station #5 -$ -$ -$ -$ 48,000$ 48,000$ Lift Station #4 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ Lift Station #53 - Generator -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #6 - Generator -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Station #6 - Pumps -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ 15,000$ Office Equipment and Furniture Computer Replacements 15,300$ 14,650$ 13,050$ 14,550$ 15,300$ 72,850$ Network Access Devices 15,000$ 10,500$ 6,000$ -$ -$ 31,500$ Other Equipment Extrication Sets (2)68,175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,175$ Fire Station #1 - Generator 52,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 52,000$ Gas/Electric Ventilation Fans (4)-$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Lift Bag (1)24,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,040$ LUCAS Chest Compression System 18,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ Rescue Boat -$ 65,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ SCBA Cascade Trailer (1)-$ 20,900$ -$ -$ -$ 20,900$ Turnout Gear -$ -$ -$ -$ 364,000$ 364,000$ Streets 2025 Street Rehabilitation Program 1,258,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,258,500$ 2026 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ 1,439,300$ -$ -$ -$ 1,439,300$ 2027 Street Reconstruction Project -$ -$ 4,450,500$ -$ -$ 4,450,500$ 2027 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ 1,505,700$ -$ -$ 1,505,700$ 2028 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ 1,861,500$ -$ 1,861,500$ 2029 Street Rehabilitation Program -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,991,225$ 1,991,225$ County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 In 20,938,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,938,750$ CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Reconstruction -$ -$ 5,175,000$ -$ -$ 5,175,000$ Market Place Dr Realignment 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Otter Lake Road Extension 8,692,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,692,500$ Robinson Drive Street and Utility Extension -$ -$ 1,190,250$ -$ -$ 1,190,250$ Trail Main Street Trail -$ 2,070,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,070,000$ Utility Rehab 2025 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 2025 Surface Water Management Project 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2026 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 2026 Surface Water Management Project -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2027 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 2027 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ 220,000$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 2028 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ 75,000$ 2028 Surface Water Management Project -$ -$ -$ 230,000$ -$ 230,000$ 2029 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 2029 Surface Water Management Project.-$ -$ -$ -$ 220,000$ 220,000$ Lift Station #10 Upgrade -$ 76,073$ -$ -$ -$ 76,073$ Lift Station #53 Restoration 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130,000$ Lift Station #9 - Pumps -$ -$ 13,000$ -$ -$ 13,000$ Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Type 23 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Type Well #3 Pumphouse Revisions -$ -$ 362,250$ -$ -$ 362,250$ Well No. 5 Rehab -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ Utility Trunk 2026 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ 103,500$ -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ 2028 Surface Water Quality Improvement Proje -$ -$ -$ 103,500$ -$ 103,500$ Birch Sanitary Trunk Crossing Upgrade 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Gravity Sewer 77th to Country Lane Swr Distr 2B -$ -$ -$ -$ 184,000$ 184,000$ Lake Drive Trunk Watermain -$ -$ 648,945$ -$ -$ 648,945$ Lift Station and Forcemain -$ 326,025$ -$ -$ -$ 326,025$ Main Street Trunk Water Connection -$ -$ -$ 1,035,000$ -$ 1,035,000$ Sewer District 3H Trunk Improvements -$ 380,880$ -$ -$ -$ 380,880$ Shenandoah Park Surface Water BMP 414,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 414,000$ Trunk Sewer 1,086,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,086,750$ Well #7 850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ Well #7 Raw Watermain to Water Treatment Pla -$ 310,500$ -$ -$ -$ 310,500$ West Side Relief Sewer to Lakeview Dr and sew -$ -$ 3,891,600$ -$ -$ 3,891,600$ Wetland Bank #3 3,326,000$ 97,500$ 161,000$ 161,000$ 150,000$ 3,895,500$ Vehicles #215 Plow Truck -$ 345,000$ -$ -$ -$ 345,000$ #218 Plow Truck -$ -$ 358,000$ -$ -$ 358,000$ #225 Truck -$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ #239 Bucket Truck 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ #255 Truck -$ -$ 169,000$ -$ -$ 169,000$ #256 Truck - Asphalt Hotbox -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #259 Truck -$ -$ 67,000$ -$ -$ 67,000$ #262 Truck -$ -$ -$ 158,000$ -$ 158,000$ #263 Truck -$ -$ 159,000$ -$ -$ 159,000$ #267 Truck -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ #268 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 95,000$ 95,000$ #306 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #307 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 65,600$ -$ 65,600$ #308 CSO Vehicle -$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ 70,000$ #309 Investigation Vehicle -$ 60,100$ -$ -$ -$ 60,100$ #311 Investigation Vehicle -$ -$ 62,800$ -$ -$ 62,800$ #314 Marked Patrol Vehicle - Canine -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #318 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #319 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #320 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #321 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #322 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #323 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ 78,000$ -$ -$ 78,000$ #328 Unmarked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #329 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #330 Marked Patrol Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ 85,900$ 85,900$ #412 Truck -$ -$ 72,000$ -$ -$ 72,000$ #416 Truck -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ -$ 82,000$ #417 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 68,000$ 68,000$ #418 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ #505 Truck 82,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ #506 Truck -$ -$ -$ 66,000$ -$ 66,000$ #508 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 67,000$ 67,000$ #606 Truck -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ #607 Truck -$ -$ 93,700$ -$ -$ 93,700$ #623 Fire Vehicle -$ 74,700$ -$ -$ -$ 74,700$ #803 Environmental Vehicle -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ #804 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ 33,000$ -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ #805 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ 32,000$ -$ -$ 32,000$ #806 Building Inspection Vehicle -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ 34,000$ 24 Project Name 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total City of Lino Lakes FY 2025 through FY 2029 Projects by Type #807 Truck -$ -$ -$ -$ 86,000$ 86,000$ #NEW Vac/Jetter Combo Truck 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000$ Total 41,375,515$ 22,787,728$ 19,231,595$ 4,574,150$ 3,781,225$ 91,750,213$ 25 APPENDIX A Project Detail 26 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-225 PROJECT NAME: Public Works Facility Project Year: 2026 Department: Government Buildings Program: Community Development Project Type: Buildings Useful Life (Years): 40 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Construct new Public Works Facility Project Justification: The existing facility was constructed in 1971 and does not meet current standards for codes, safety, facility maintenance and vehicle storage needs. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Building and Facilities Fund (401)$400,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,800,000 Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Water Operating Fund (601)$0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Total $400,000 $16,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,400,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Facility Construction $400,000 $16,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,400,000 Total $400,000 $16,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,400,000 27 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-58 PROJECT NAME: #117 Tractor Project Year: 2025 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2002 John Deere 6410 Tractor. Project Justification: Primary use is mowing ditches, plowing snow, and brush mowing. Purchased in 2002 the JD Tractor has surpassed its estimated useful life in the Capital Asset Policy of 10 years. This piece of equipment has been bumped from year to year and is in need of replacement with over 5,500 hours on the machine. Replacement would be a tractor comparable in size, power and capability. New attachments for this equipment will be included in the purchase. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 Total $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 Total $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 28 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-2 PROJECT NAME: #251 Backhoe Project Year: 2025 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2011 Caterpillar 420E Backhoe Project Justification: 2011 Caterpillar 420E Backhoe used in road maintenance, loading trucks, park maintenance, utility repairs, snow and ice removal, and storm cleanup. The machine has 2800 hours of use on it and is starting to require more replacement parts needed to stay in operation. Recommendation is to replace the 2011 Caterpillar 420E Backhoe with a machine of similar size, power, and capabilities. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Total $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Total $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 29 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-27 PROJECT NAME: #NEW Lawn Mower Project Year: 2025 Department: Parks Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: *2019 Ferris Zero Turn Mower*. This was originally a request to replace a 2019 Ferris Zero Turn Mower. The request has been changed to increase the fleet of Zero Turn Mowers while increasing the duration of the replacement schedule from 6 years to 8 years. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 Total $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 Total $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 30 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-61 PROJECT NAME: #140 Tractor Project Year: 2026 Department: Parks Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2007 John Deere 5525 Tractor Project Justification: The 2007 JD 5525 tractor is primarily used to mow parks. To quickly mow broad open spaces, the tractor employs a progressive mower with a 16' wide cut that is used in all city parks. Other functions of the tractor include brooming offroad debris to aid in street sweeping and sweeping hockey rinks. Purchased in 2007 with over 6100 hours of use, the tractor has surpassed its useful life of 10 years per the Capital Asset Policy. A new purchase would be a tractor of similar size, power, and capacity. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 Total $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 Total $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 31 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-56 PROJECT NAME: #252 Street Sweeper Project Year: 2026 Department: Storm Water Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2012 Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper Project Justification: Purchased in 2012 the Elgin pelican street sweeper has been used primarily in spring and fall sweeping of debris from the winter plowing season and fall cleanup of leaves and sand from the summer. This piece of equipment is primarily used to protect our stormwater ponds, structures, and pipes and to keep the streets clean. Replacement is recommended based on hours 2900 and years of service. In the 2022 season the sweep has spent significant time being repaired. Replacement would be a sweeper with similar power, capabilities, and size. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Total $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $ $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Total $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 32 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-145 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #53 - Generator Project Year: 2026 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement of 2006 Generator at Lift Station 53 (LS53) Project Justification: Generator becomes unreliable after 20yrs and replacement parts are hard find if not discontinued. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 33 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-214 PROJECT NAME: #409 Lawn Mower Pull Behind Project Year: 2027 Department: Parks Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2017 Progressive Mower Pull Behind. Mows open park spaces, tractor PTO powered. Project Justification: Replacement is recommended due to wear and tear of the heavy daily use of this attachment. Bearings, PTO boxes, wheels, and hydraulics have been recent failures of the attachment. Recommended replacement is a similar pull behind mower in size, power, and capacity. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 Total $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 Total $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 34 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-168 PROJECT NAME: #210 Mack Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2015 Mack Truck Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 35 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-215 PROJECT NAME: #411 RTV Project Year: 2028 Department: Parks Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2017 Kubota RTV Project Justification: Used in controlled burns, trail maint., and park maint. With only 147 hours consider moving replacement out or removing from replacement schedule Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $18,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $18,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $18,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $18,000 36 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-131 PROJECT NAME: #507 Mower Project Year: 2028 Department: Utilities Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2018 Ferris Mower 400S with bagger system Project Justification: Mower #405 with 208 hours of operation in mowing and trim mowing utilities lift stations, well houses, and water tower sites. Replacement of 2018 Ferris Zero Turn Mower is recommended in 2028. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 37 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-141 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #4 - Generator Project Year: 2028 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement for 2008 Generator for Lift Station 4 (LS4GEN) Project Justification: Generator becomes unreliable after 20yrs and replacement parts are hard find if not discontinued. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 38 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-143 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #6 - Generator Project Year: 2028 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement of 2008 Generator at Lift Station 6 (LS6GEN) Project Justification: Generator becomes unreliable after 20yrs and replacement parts are hard find if not discontinued. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 39 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-170 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #6 - Pumps Project Year: 2028 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement of Lift Station #6 Pumps 2 Pumps X $7,500 = $15,000 Project Justification: Pumps become unreliable after 20yrs Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Small Tools/Equipment $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 40 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-142 PROJECT NAME: Generator Lift Station #5 Project Year: 2029 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Machinery and Shop Equipment Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement for 2009 Generator for Lift Station 5 (LS5GEN) Project Justification: Generator becomes unreliable after 20yrs and replacement parts are hard find if not discontinued. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $48,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $48,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $48,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $48,000 41 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-345 PROJECT NAME: Computer Replacements Project Year: 2025 Department: Administration/Finance Program: Citywide Project Type: Office Equipment and Furniture Useful Life (Years): 4 Contact Person: Finance Director Project Description: Replacement of governmental fund employees' computers and related hardware. Includes annual City Council Technology Stipends. Replacement of computers and related hardware for Rookery and Enterprise Fund employees' is accounted for in the annual adopted budget. Project Justification: Industry standard is to replace computers and hardware every 3-5 years. The older a computer gets, the slower and more problematic it becomes which can hinder productivity as well as the safety of the network it is connected to. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Office Equipment Replacement Fund (403) $15,300 $14,650 $13,050 $14,550 $15,300 $72,850 Total $15,300 $14,650 $13,050 $14,550 $15,300 $72,850 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Office Equipment/Software $15,300 $14,650 $13,050 $14,550 $15,300 $72,850 Total $15,300 $14,650 $13,050 $14,550 $15,300 $72,850 42 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-344 PROJECT NAME: Network Access Devices Project Year: 2025 Department: Administration/Finance Program: Citywide Project Type: Office Equipment and Furniture Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Finance Director Project Description: Replacement of network switches, routers, firewalls, and wireless access points per Metro-iNet's Capital Replacement Program. Project Justification: Maintain the integrity of the City's network. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Office Equipment Replacement Fund (403) $15,000 $10,500 $6,000 $0 $0 $31,500 Total $15,000 $10,500 $6,000 $0 $0 $31,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Office Equipment/Software $15,000 $10,500 $6,000 $0 $0 $31,500 Total $15,000 $10,500 $6,000 $0 $0 $31,500 43 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-97 PROJECT NAME: Extrication Sets (2) Project Year: 2025 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: These are gas engine that uses hydraulic power to spread, lift and cut to extricate trapped people from vehicle crashes. These are located on both engines. Project Justification: In having a significant length of both I-35E and I-35W in our City, the exposure to high speed motor vehicle crashes are significant. With high speed crashes the likelihood of patient or victim entrapment greatly increases. From January 2016 to April 2022 we responded to over 830 calls for Rescue Services. We responded to motor vehicle crashes more than any other calls for service. Sometimes more than one at a time. We can be dealing with a serious crash on I-35E and then receive another crash on I-35W at the same time. This increases the need to have two sets of equipment. The two sets of extrication equipment we have are the same brand and model. This makes operating them, when time is critical, more efficient. It also makes the training easier. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $68,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,175 Total $68,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,175 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $68,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,175 Total $68,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,175 44 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-224 PROJECT NAME: Fire Station #1 - Generator Project Year: 2025 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2000 Generac Generator Fire Station 1 Project Justification: Replacement dictated by the capital asset policy. Generator was purchased in 2000 and is starting to become unreliable with many parts being replaced or needing service. Critical in power failures to operate fire station and garage doors. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Building and Facilities Fund (401) $52,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,000 Total $52,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $52,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,000 Total $52,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,000 45 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-98 PROJECT NAME: Lift Bag (1) Project Year: 2025 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Pneumatic bags that can lift vehicles or machinery to free trapped patients. These are located in Rescue 11. Project Justification: In having a significant length of both I-35E and I-35W in our City, the exposure to high speed motor vehicle crashes is significant. With high speed crashes, the likelihood of patient or victim entrapment greatly increases. From January 2016 to April 2022 we responded to over 830 calls for Rescue Services . We responded to motor vehicle crashes more than any other calls for service. Sometimes more than one at a time. We can be dealing with a serious crash on I-35E and then receive another crash on I-35W at the same time. We use the lift bags to lift vehicles or heavy equipment to make room to remove a trapped person. We have only used these a few times in the last six years, but this was the only tool that would work to free them. Two of the times that we needed to use the lift bags involved people in motor vehicle crashes. Both patients were ejected and their vehicles rolled over on them. We currently have one set of lift bags. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $24,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,040 Total $24,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,040 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $24,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,040 Total $24,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,040 46 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-355 PROJECT NAME: LUCAS Chest Compression System Project Year: 2025 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: The LUCAS Chest Compression System is designed to provide effective, consistent, and uninterrupted chest compressions during cardiac arrest. Project Justification: The mechanic compressions are more effective than human compressions during CPR. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Total $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Total $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 47 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-108 PROJECT NAME: Gas/Electric Ventilation Fans (4) Project Year: 2026 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: We use these fans to remove smoke or odors from a structure when it is or has been on fire. This equipment is on both engines and aerials. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Total $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 48 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-50 PROJECT NAME: Rescue Boat Project Year: 2026 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: B21 14' Zodiac boat Project Justification: Many people come to Lino Lakes to enjoy the many perks of Anoka County’s largest park and Lino Lakes’ residents pride themselves on having such a beautiful natural resource in their back yards. With having this vast natural resource in the middle of our city, comes the great responsibility of the Public Safety Department to have adequate equipment to respond to a variety of calls within in the County Park and waterways. Being able to reach the public in the event of an emergency while they are stranded on the water is currently a great burden on our Public Safety staff. Most of the lakes in the County Park are very shallow and with shallow water comes the issue of vegetation growing to the surface the lakes throughout the park very quickly every spring. The boat we received from the split with Centennial Fire is an inadequate piece of rescue equipment for the type of waterways located throughout Lino Lakes. The current Zodiac boat is sufficient for accessing 90% of Centerville Lake and 50% of Peltier Lake. Once the high water in the spring resides and the weeds have grown to the surface of our waters (typically in May), the Zodiac boat cannot access any waterway that does not have a DNR maintained boat launch (Centerville and Peltier Lakes). The Zodiac boat needs at least 18”-24” of water to operate (depending on the amount of people in the boat) and cannot be used in most of our neighborhood holding ponds either. The 14’ Zodiac boat does not have enough space to transport a back boarded patient (unless placed on top of the sides of the boat), the staff needed to get the patient into the boat and is initiate for delivering patient care. Our Public Safety personnel had two calls, for three stranded victims in the last year where they were unable to reach the patients with the current Zodiac boat. One call was on Marshan Lake, neither our Zodiac boat nor Forest Lake’s fan boat was able to reach the victim and a citizen in a canoe was the one who rescued the victim an hour after the original call to 911. The second call was for two victims stranded on a jet ski at the far North end of Peltier Lake; Forest Lake, Washington County, Anoka County and the DNR was not able to assist our staff with the proper equipment to make the rescue. Our personnel were able to get within 100 yards of the two victims with the Zodiac boat and had to swim in water rescue suits (not designed for long swims) to reach the victims. Once our staff reached the victims, they had to then swim the victims back to the boat and where able to return the victims to the boat launch an hour and a half after the original call was made to 911. If either of these calls were a life or death situation, we would have lost three lives due to insufficient rescue equipment. 49 As our community and the communities around us continue to grow, more of our residents and the public will be introduced to our County Park. With larger amounts of public using the park, the Public Safety Department will be called to a larger volume of difficult to reach calls. This is why I am asking for $55,000 to purchase an 18’ Gator Tail Boat, motor, trailer, fire pump and equipment. Gator Tail Boats were originally designed for the use of duck hunters to use in the muddy slews of Louisiana. Overtime departments have seen the value of having these boats as fire rescue boats. These boats are a flat bottom boat with a specifically designed motor to operate in mere inches of water and weigh much less. The vegetation that fills our waterways, low water levels and the many low clearance bridges that cross the water will be no problem for a Gator Tail Boat (a fan boat cannot fit under the bridges). By equipping the Gator Tail boat with a fire pump, this will allow personnel to fight wild fires safely from the water without the worry of running out of water and the pump can also provide an endless supply of water to personnel fighting the fire on shore. With the use of a UTV, the Gator Tail boat can easily be deployed into most of our holding ponds in the event of an emergency as well. The yearly maintenance of having a new boat is very minimal once the factory warranty expires, the estimated cost would be $500 per year. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 Total $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 Total $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 50 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-103 PROJECT NAME: SCBA Cascade Trailer (1) Project Year: 2026 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: This trailer can be brought to the scene of a fire to fill our SCBA's bottles on scene. This trailer is kept at Fire Station 1. Fire Station 1 does not have a compressor so we use this trailer to keep the SCBA bottles at Station 1 filled. Project Justification: We currently have an SCBA(Self-contained Breathing Apparatus)trailer. This trailer is located at Fire Station 1. It has five large E cylinders that are connected by a manifold. We use this trailer to refill the SCBA bottles on all the fire apparatus at Fire Station 1. Fire Station 1 does not have an SCBA compressor. To be able to refill these bottles without loading them into a vehicle and driving to Station 2 to fill them saves time and is much safer. Transporting SCBA bottles in a motor vehicle is dangerous. By having a trailer that is designed to move large tanks that are secure, is much safer. We purchased this used trailer from the Virginia Fire Department. The trailer is home made and has been repaired over the years. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $20,900 $0 $0 $0 $20,900 Total $0 $20,900 $0 $0 $0 $20,900 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $20,900 $0 $0 $0 $20,900 Total $0 $20,900 $0 $0 $0 $20,900 51 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-106 PROJECT NAME: Turnout Gear Project Year: 2029 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Other Equipment Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace 40 Sets of Turnout Gear Project Justification: This gear is the first line of protection for our staff when responding to emergency calls. The turnout gear is issued to each firefighter. Per state law passed in 2024 no PFAS are allowed to be in fire turn out gear. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,000 $364,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,000 $364,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Small Tools/Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,000 $364,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,000 $364,000 52 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-88 PROJECT NAME: 2025 Street Rehabilitation Program Project Year: 2025 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Mill and Overlay Fawn Lane, Beaver Tr, Muskrat Run, Coyote Trl, Coyote Ct. Project Justification: Planned maintenance required to maintain Overall Condition Index (OCI) in accordance with Pavement Management Program. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Pavement Management Fund (421) $1,138,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,138,500 Water Operating Fund (601) $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Total $1,258,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,258,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $1,258,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,258,500 Total $1,258,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,258,500 53 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-7 PROJECT NAME: County Road J/Centerville Rd Intersection/35 Interchange Project Year: 2025 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Intersection improvements at CRJ, bridge ramps and bridge replacement over 35E Project Justification: Intersections are exceeding capacity. State Bonding dollars were obtained to prepare design and environmental documentation in 2020. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Anoka County $7,245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,245,000 Assessments $258,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $258,750 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) $1,035,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 Other $12,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,400,000 Total $20,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,938,750 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $20,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,938,750 Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $20,938,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,938,750 54 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-84 PROJECT NAME: Market Place Dr Realignment Project Year: 2025 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Realign 77th Street to connect Maryland and MarketPlace Drive. Project Justification: Provides for redevelopment of properties north and south of new location and full access to residential neighborhoods west of Lake Drive. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Other $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 Total $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 55 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-45 PROJECT NAME: Otter Lake Road Extension Project Year: 2025 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Extension of Otter Lake Road from Main to Elmcrest. Includes Trunk Sewer NE Area SD 5A, trunk water and surface water. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) $4,657,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,657,500 Surface Water Management Fund (422) $1,035,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 Total $8,692,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,692,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $8,692,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,692,500 Total $8,692,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,692,500 56 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-114 PROJECT NAME: 2026 Street Rehabilitation Program Project Year: 2026 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual mill & overlay project. Approximately 1.5 miles. Lonesome Pine, Country Lakes Drive, Lindon Ln and Red Hawk Trail Project Justification: Planned maintenance required to maintain Overall Condition Index (OCI) in accordance with Pavement Management Program. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Pavement Management Fund (421) $0 $1,309,300 $0 $0 $0 $1,309,300 Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Total $0 $1,439,300 $0 $0 $0 $1,439,300 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $1,439,300 $0 $0 $0 $1,439,300 Total $0 $1,439,300 $0 $0 $0 $1,439,300 57 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-184 PROJECT NAME: 2027 Street Reconstruction Project Project Year: 2027 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Reconstruction of streets including Lakeview Dr. from Elm Street to Glenview. Includes side streets of Fairview Dr, and Gladstone. Includes stormwater retrofit and West Relief Sanitary Sewer Interceptor project. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Bond Proceeds $0 $0 $4,450,500 $0 $0 $4,450,500 Total $0 $0 $4,450,500 $0 $0 $4,450,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $4,450,500 $0 $0 $4,450,500 Total $0 $0 $4,450,500 $0 $0 $4,450,500 58 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-183 PROJECT NAME: 2027 Street Rehabilitation Program Project Year: 2027 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual mill & overlay project. Approximately 1.5 miles. Project area TBD. Project Justification: Planned maintenance required to maintain Overall Condition Index (OCI) in accordance with Pavement Management Program. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Pavement Management Fund (421) $0 $0 $1,505,700 $0 $0 $1,505,700 Total $0 $0 $1,505,700 $0 $0 $1,505,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $1,505,700 $0 $0 $1,505,700 Total $0 $0 $1,505,700 $0 $0 $1,505,700 59 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-346 PROJECT NAME: CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Reconstruction Project Year: 2027 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 40 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Anoka County is reconstruction Sunset Avenue from 109th Street to Main Street. Project will include sanitary sewer and water main were necessary. Project Justification: Anoka County has identified increased traffic and safety concerns along the corridor. Public comment recieved as part of the Main and Sunset RAB process also identified safety and speed concerns with this corridor. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Anoka County $0 $0 $4,916,250 $0 $0 $4,916,250 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) $0 $0 $258,750 $0 $0 $258,750 Total $0 $0 $5,175,000 $0 $0 $5,175,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $5,175,000 $0 $0 $5,175,000 Total $0 $0 $5,175,000 $0 $0 $5,175,000 60 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-339 PROJECT NAME: Robinson Drive Street and Utility Extension Project Year: 2027 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Extension of Robinson Drive Collector Road from proposed Promenade Development to 4th Avenue. Provides east-west connectivity between Sunset and 4th Avenue. Project Justification: This is a planned collector road in the City's Comprehensive Transportation plan. The connection will distribute traffic more effectively from the development to the west. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $ $0 $362,250 $0 $0 $362,250 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund (420) $ $0 $828,000 $0 $0 $828,000 Total $0 $0 $1,190,250 $0 $0 $1,190,250 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $ $0 $1,190,250 $0 $0 $1,190,250 Total $0 $0 $1,190,250 $0 $0 $1,190,250 61 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-336 PROJECT NAME: 2028 Street Rehabilitation Program Project Year: 2028 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual mill & overlay project. Approximately 1.5 miles. Project area TBD. Project Justification: Planned maintenance required to maintain Overall Condition Index (OCI) in accordance with Pavement Management Program. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Pavement Management Fund (421) $0 $0 $ $1,731,500 $0 $1,731,500 Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,861,500 $0 $1,861,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $1,861,500 $0 $1,861,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,861,500 $0 $1,861,500 62 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-348 PROJECT NAME: 2029 Street Rehabilitation Program Project Year: 2029 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Streets Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual mill & overlay project. Approximately 1.5 miles. Streets to be determined Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Pavement Management Fund (421) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,991,225 $1,991,225 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,991,225 $1,991,225 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,991,225 $1,991,225 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,991,225 $1,991,225 63 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-31 PROJECT NAME: Main Street Trail Project Year: 2026 Department: Parks Program: Community Development Project Type: Trail Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Extend Bituminous Trail along Main Street from Lino Lakes Elementary to 35W crossing Project Justification: Expansion of regional trail system in accordance with City and County Comprehensive Trail Plans. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Anoka County $0 $207,000 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 Other $0 $1,656,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,656,000 Park Dedication Fund (405) $0 $207,000 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 Total $0 $2,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,070,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $2,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,070,000 Total $0 $2,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,070,000 64 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-122 PROJECT NAME: 2025 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Project Year: 2025 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Line Sanitary Sewer main lines from Birch/West Shadow to Ware Road Lift Station Project Justification: Seepage of ground water into sanitary sewer system increases discharge to Met Council system resulting in higher sewer charges and need for additional capacity downstream. This is a main trunk line with high flows and requires bypass pumping. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Total $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Total $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 65 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-117 PROJECT NAME: 2025 Surface Water Management Project Project Year: 2025 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual storm pond, pipe, and outlet cleaning and maintenance Project Justification: Maintenance of storm facilities to meet rate and water quality requirements Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 66 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-354 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #53 Restoration Project Year: 2025 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Lift #53 Wet Well Restoration and Bypass Pumping Project Justification: Well #53 walls sealed from I and I, force main piping and check valves replaced, guiderails replaced with SS dual rail system and bypass pumping the stations flow to allow for access into the wet well to conduct repairs. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Total $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Total $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 67 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-48 PROJECT NAME: Well #2 Pumphouse Revisions Project Year: 2025 Department: Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Well No. 2 refurbish well and add chemical treatment rooms if well is kept in service. Well may be capped to allow for construction of Well No. 7. Project Justification: Well No. 2 is aging and does not have separated chemical rooms. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Water Operating Fund (601) $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Total $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Total $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 68 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-123 PROJECT NAME: 2026 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Project Year: 2026 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Line Sanitary Sewer main lines and manholes to reduce inflow and infiltration into the system. Project Justification: Seepage of ground water into sanitary sewer system increases discharge to Met Council system resulting in higher sewer charges and need for additional capacity downstream. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Total $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Total $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 69 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-119 PROJECT NAME: 2026 Surface Water Management Project Project Year: 2026 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual storm pond, pipe, and outlet cleaning and maintenance Project Justification: Maintenance of storm facilities to meet rate and water quality requirements Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 70 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-126 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #10 Upgrade Project Year: 2026 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Upgrade Lift Station 10 (Century Trail) - pump addition to list station serving sewer district 2I north of Century Farm North development Project Justification: Add additional pump to increase capacity to accommodate new growth in subdistrict Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $76,073 $0 $0 $0 $76,073 Total $0 $76,073 $0 $0 $0 $76,073 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $76,073 $0 $0 $0 $76,073 Total $0 $76,073 $0 $0 $0 $76,073 71 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-186 PROJECT NAME: 2027 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Project Year: 2027 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Line Sanitary Sewer main lines and manholes to reduce inflow and infiltration into the system. Project Justification: Seepage of ground water into sanitary sewer system increases discharge to Met Council system resulting in higher sewer charges and need for additional capacity downstream. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 Total $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 Total $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 72 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-118 PROJECT NAME: 2027 Surface Water Management Project Project Year: 2027 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual storm pond, pipe, and outlet cleaning and maintenance Project Justification: Maintenance of storm facilities to meet rate and water quality requirements Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $220,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $220,000 Total $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $220,000 73 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-177 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station #9 - Pumps Project Year: 2027 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement of Lift Station #9 Pumps 2pumps X $6,500 = $13,000 Project Justification: Pumps become old and unreliable. Cheaper to replace than to repair. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 Total $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Small Tools/Equipment $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 Total $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 74 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-128 PROJECT NAME: Well #3 Pumphouse Revisions Project Year: 2027 Department: Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Upgrade of well house to meet current requirements. Includes roofing, electrical and mechanical revisions. Project Justification: Building is nearing 50 years old and in need of updates. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Water Operating Fund (601) $ $0 $362,250 $0 $0 $362,250 Total $0 $0 $362,250 $0 $0 $362,250 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $ $0 $362,250 $0 $0 $362,250 Total $0 $0 $362,250 $0 $0 $362,250 75 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-338 PROJECT NAME: 2028 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Project Year: 2028 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 30 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Line Sanitary Sewer main lines and manholes to reduce inflow and infiltration into the system. Project Justification: Seepage of ground water into sanitary sewer system increases discharge to Met Council system resulting in higher sewer charges and need for additional capacity downstream. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 76 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-337 PROJECT NAME: 2028 Surface Water Management Project Project Year: 2028 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 30 Contact Person: Project Description: Annual storm pond, pipe, and outlet cleaning and maintenance Project Justification: Maintenance of storm facilities to meet rate and water quality requirement Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $230,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $230,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $230,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $230,000 77 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-335 PROJECT NAME: Well No. 5 Rehab Project Year: 2028 Department: Streets Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Replace roof and mechanical equipment Project Justification: Building was constructed in 2005 and nearing 25 years of age. Maintenance is required to maintain operational functionality of building. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 78 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-350 PROJECT NAME: 2029 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project Project Year: 2029 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 30 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual lining project to reduce inflow and infiltration. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 79 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-349 PROJECT NAME: 2029 Surface Water Management Project. Project Year: 2029 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Rehab Useful Life (Years): 30 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Annual Surface Water Management Project. Clean and repair drainage swales, ponding , and structures. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Storm Water Operating Fund (603) $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 80 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-347 PROJECT NAME: Birch Sanitary Trunk Crossing Upgrade Project Year: 2025 Department: Utilities Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 75 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Redundant Xing and capacity increase related to Accommodate Water Treatment Plant flows Project Justification: Additional capacity is needed in service line to accommodate increased sewer flows. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 81 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-187 PROJECT NAME: Shenandoah Park Surface Water BMP Project Year: 2025 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Construct storm water Best Management Project at Shenandoah Park per 2022 Feasibility Study. 50% cost share with RCWD. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Other $207,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 Surface Water Management Fund (422) $207,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 Total $414,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $414,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,000 Total $414,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,000 82 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-65 PROJECT NAME: Trunk Sewer Project Year: 2025 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Century Farm North SD 2I. Extension of sanitary sewer north of Robinson Drive to service sod farms. Improvements will be developer installed. Trunk Utility charges will be credited for oversizing and overdepth. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $258,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $258,750 Other $828,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $828,000 Total $1,086,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,086,750 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $1,086,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,086,750 Total $1,086,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,086,750 83 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-74 PROJECT NAME: Well #7 Project Year: 2025 Department: Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Construction of Well No. 7 and Pumphouse to provide additional water production. Preliminary Well site is proposed to be located adjacent to Rice Creek Elementary on property currently owned by Anoka County or WTP site. . Demo Well No. 2 pumphouse and cap well no. 2 Project Justification: Well 7 is proposed to replace well no. 2. If Well No. 2 is reconstructed and remains in use. Programmed dollars for well 7 would be applied to for raw water line supply to WTP site. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 Total $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 Total $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 84 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-201 PROJECT NAME: Wetland Bank #3 Project Year: 2025 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 30 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Land acquisition and Construction Project Justification: Establish wetland bank for preservation of open space, credit sale and use on City projects. Credit sales used to offset project costs as part of Natural Resource Revolving Fund. Also serves as stormwater/flood mitigation retention area for NE Drainage Area Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Surface Water Management Fund (422) $3,326,000 $97,500 $161,000 $161,000 $150,000 $3,895,500 Total $3,326,000 $97,500 $161,000 $161,000 $150,000 $3,895,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $3,326,000 $97,500 $161,000 $161,000 $150,000 $3,895,500 Total $3,326,000 $97,500 $161,000 $161,000 $150,000 $3,895,500 85 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-202 PROJECT NAME: 2026 Surface Water Quality Improvement Project Project Year: 2026 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Wilkenson Lake Water Quality Improvement Project. Project designed to address impaired waters phosphorus load reductions in a designated subwatershed Project Justification: City is required under it's MS4 permit to reducing pollutant loading in impaired waters by reducing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) limits. Wilkinson Lake pretreatment Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Surface Water Management Fund (422) $ $103,500 $0 $0 $0 $103,500 Total $0 $103,500 $0 $0 $0 $103,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $ $103,500 $0 $0 $0 $103,500 Total $0 $103,500 $0 $0 $0 $103,500 86 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-28 PROJECT NAME: Lift Station and Forcemain Project Year: 2026 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Haywood Drive LS and Forcemain for Sewer District 2K (Maple Street) Project Justification: Provide sanitary sewer to small lot area with failing subsurface sewage treatment systems Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $326,025 $0 $0 $0 $326,025 Total $0 $326,025 $0 $0 $0 $326,025 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $326,025 $0 $0 $0 $326,025 Total $0 $326,025 $0 $0 $0 $326,025 87 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-127 PROJECT NAME: Sewer District 3H Trunk Improvements Project Year: 2026 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Construction of Lift Station and forecemain to serve sewer subdistrict 3H (west of 20th Avenue). Liebel and Salo properties located in utility staging areas 1A and 1B. Project Justification: Property is guided for sewered residential growth in utility staging area 1A and 1B (2020-2030). Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $ $190,440 $0 $0 $0 $190,440 Assessments $ $190,440 $0 $0 $0 $190,440 Total $0 $380,880 $0 $0 $0 $380,880 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $ $380,880 $0 $0 $0 $380,880 Total $0 $380,880 $0 $0 $0 $380,880 88 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-125 PROJECT NAME: Well #7 Raw Watermain to Water Treatment Plant Project Year: 2026 Department: Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Construct a raw water main to water treatment plant Project Justification: Need to connect additional production to treatment plant to meet water supply demand. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $310,500 $0 $0 $0 $310,500 Total $0 $310,500 $0 $0 $0 $310,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $310,500 $0 $0 $0 $310,500 Total $0 $310,500 $0 $0 $0 $310,500 89 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-25 PROJECT NAME: Lake Drive Trunk Watermain Project Year: 2027 Department: Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Phase 3 - 2nd Ave to Ivy Ridge Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $0 $648,945 $0 $0 $648,945 Total $0 $0 $648,945 $0 $0 $648,945 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $648,945 $0 $0 $648,945 Total $0 $0 $648,945 $0 $0 $648,945 90 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-185 PROJECT NAME: West Side Relief Sewer to Lakeview Dr and sewer districts 2E, 2F, 2I, 2J Project Year: 2027 Department: Utilities Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Provides sewer service to Lakeview Drive and new trunk capacity for sewer districts north 35w and west of 4th Avenue. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $0 $3,891,600 $0 $0 $3,891,600 Total $0 $0 $3,891,600 $0 $0 $3,891,600 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $3,891,600 $0 $0 $3,891,600 Total $0 $0 $3,891,600 $0 $0 $3,891,600 91 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-203 PROJECT NAME: 2028 Surface Water Quality Improvement Project Project Year: 2028 Department: Storm Water Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 25 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Installation of Water Quality BMP's to reduce contaminants entering public waters Project Justification: City is required under MS4 permit to meeting TMDL loading restrictions. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Surface Water Management Fund (422) $0 $0 $0 $103,500 $0 $103,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $103,500 $0 $103,500 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $103,500 $0 $103,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $103,500 $0 $103,500 92 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-340 PROJECT NAME: Main Street Trunk Water Connection Project Year: 2028 Department: Utilities Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Trunk watermain extension to complete northern water loop. Project involves extension of 16" watermain from Robinson Dr/4th Avenue to Woodduck/Main Street Project Justification: The northern trunk water main is necessary to provide a looped system to support adequate water supply and pressure. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $0 $1,035,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $0 $1,035,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $0 $1,035,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $0 $1,035,000 93 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CD-351 PROJECT NAME: Gravity Sewer 77th to Country Lane Swr Distr 2B Project Year: 2029 Department: Sewer Program: Community Development Project Type: Utility Trunk Useful Life (Years): 50 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: Sanitary Sewer extension to existing neighborhood. Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Area & Unit Trunk Fund (406) $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 Assessments $0 $0 $0 $0 $124,000 $124,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $184,000 $184,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $184,000 $184,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $184,000 $184,000 94 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-5 PROJECT NAME: #239 Bucket Truck Project Year: 2025 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 1993 Ford L8000 Bucket Truck Project Justification: 1993 Ford L8000 Bucket Truck is a repurposed plow truck that was fitted with a bucket and boom platform. It has 105,000 miles on the truck. Replacement truck recommendation is smaller size truck but comparable boom and bucket capabilities. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 Total $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 Total $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 95 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-133 PROJECT NAME: #505 Truck Project Year: 2025 Department: Utilities Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2016 Ford F250 Super Cab Project Justification: Truck #505 purchased in 2016 is a utilities vehicle. This vehicle is assigned to one employee in the utilities department as their primary vehicle. The truck is used in the daily operations of the utilities department for station checks, locates, water shut offs, hauling large equipment, and the snow removal operations primarily plowing cul-de-sacs and utilities lots. This vehicle has 82,000 miles on it (12/2022) and is not the right truck for utilities operations. Replacement recommendation is a four door pickup which fits the operations and usage these trucks receive. Truck #505 is starting to need repairs such as alignments, tie rods, and has had issues starting. Vehicle replacement is recommended based on the capital asset policy, wear and tear, and vehicle purpose. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $41,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 Water Operating Fund (601) $41,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 Total $82,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $82,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,000 Total $82,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,000 96 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-136 PROJECT NAME: #NEW Vac/Jetter Combo Truck Project Year: 2025 Department: Sewer Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: New Request- Vac/Jetter Combo Truck Project Justification: Equipment to clean 20% of all sewer and storm sewer lines in the city annually. The current fair rate for contracted cleaning is $1.12 per foot. In Lino Lakes, there are currently 53 miles of storm sewer lines and over 100 miles of sanitary sewer lines that belong to the city, which are increasing every year. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 Total $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 Total $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 97 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-47 PROJECT NAME: #215 Plow Truck Project Year: 2026 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2008 Ford Sterling Dump Truck Project Justification: Purchased in 2008 this plow truck has served its purpose. The plow truck has been pushed out for replacement over the last few years. This is a critical piece of equipment in the snow removal process and is responsible for clearing 1/5 of city roads of snow. The operation conditions of the power truck are consistently in the ice, salt, and snow. The trucks are operated under heavy working loads with full dump boxes, plow, and wing. The trucks are operated in a constant working condition while pushing snow. Truck breakdowns and unreliability of the equipment are becoming concerns especially during snow emergencies. Truck #215 has over 28,000 miles the body is showing signs of age and failure in the near future. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000 Total $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000 Total $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000 98 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-159 PROJECT NAME: #225 Truck Project Year: 2026 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2012 Ford F-350 4X4 Pickup Project Justification: Truck #225 is a 1 Ton single rear wheel vehicle with a crane and utility box. It is primarily used for sign work. The truck and utility box that are married together are not compatible and make the use of the truck limited. The replacement truck must be more purpose built. Replacement is recommended because of years of service and the limited function. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Total $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 Total $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 99 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-8 PROJECT NAME: #308 CSO Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 6 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2018 GMC Sierra Crew Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are routinely driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and our staff. Police staff are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. This vehicle is routinely used to transport prisoners. Consideration of prisoner safety needs to be a factor when considering the replacement of this vehicle. Original scheduled for replacement in 2025 but did not meet replacement requirements. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $ $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Total $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Total $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 100 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-32 PROJECT NAME: #309 Investigation Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 8 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2018 Ford Escape Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are routinely driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and our staff. Police staff are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $60,100 $0 $0 $0 $60,100 Total $0 $60,100 $0 $0 $0 $60,100 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $60,100 $0 $0 $0 $60,100 Total $0 $60,100 $0 $0 $0 $60,100 101 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-37 PROJECT NAME: #314 Marked Patrol Vehicle - Canine Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2020 Ford Explorer Project Justification: Original scheduled for replacement in 2025 but squad did not meet mileage requirements for replacement. Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 102 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-43 PROJECT NAME: #318 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace Chevy Tahoe patrol #318 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 103 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-42 PROJECT NAME: #319 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace 2021 Chevy Tahoe patrol vehicle #319 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 104 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-44 PROJECT NAME: #320 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace 2021 Chevy Tahoe patrol vehicle #320 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 105 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-197 PROJECT NAME: #623 Fire Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2021 Chevy Tahoe Project Justification: Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 Total $0 $74,700 $0 $0 $0 $74,700 106 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-64 PROJECT NAME: #803 Environmental Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Environmental Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2015 GMC Sierra 4WD Reg Cab Pickup Project Justification: Truck #803 is used in the forestry department and has 68,000 miles (12/2022). This truck is primarily used in the transport of staff. Replacement is recommended based on the capital asset policies useful life of the vehicle. Recommended replacement is a light truck, Ranger or Colorado. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Total $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Total $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 107 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-221 PROJECT NAME: #804 Building Inspection Vehicle Project Year: 2026 Department: Building Inspections Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Community Development Director Project Description: 2017 Ford Interceptor 4 Door Project Justification: Vehicle #804 is used in the transportation of inspectors to and from the inspection site. The vehicle has 30,000 miles (12/2022). Replacement is recommended by the capital asset policy based on years in service. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 Total $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 Total $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 108 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-146 PROJECT NAME: #218 Plow Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2010 Sterling L8500 Single Axle Dump Truck Project Justification: Purchased in 2009 this plow truck has served its purpose. The plow truck has been pushed out for replacement over the last few years. This is a critical piece of equipment in the snow removal process and is responsible for clearing 1/5 of city roads of snow. The operation conditions of the power truck are consistently in the ice, salt, and snow. The trucks are operated under heavy working loads with full dump boxes, plow, and wing. The trucks are operated in a constant working condition while pushing snow. Truck breakdowns and unreliability of the equipment are becoming concerns especially during snow emergencies. Truck #218 has over 48,000 miles the body is showing signs of age and failure in the near future. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $358,000 $0 $0 $358,000 Total $0 $0 $358,000 $0 $0 $358,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $358,000 $0 $0 $358,000 Total $0 $0 $358,000 $0 $0 $358,000 109 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-160 PROJECT NAME: #255 Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2015 F350 4X4 Reg Chas Cab DRW Project Justification: Truck #255 a Ford 1 Ton with dump box was purchased in 2015. The trucks winter priority is salting and plowing parking lots and cul-de-sacs. Replacement truck would be a truck, plow and salt dogg with similar capabilities, power, and larger size (F-550) or comparable. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $169,000 Total $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $169,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $169,000 Total $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $169,000 110 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-161 PROJECT NAME: #256 Truck - Asphalt Hotbox Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 13 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: Replacement for 2015 F550 4X4 Reg Chas Cab Cab DRW - Asphalt Hotbox Project Justification: Truck #256 is an F-550. This is primarily used as the asphalt truck. It is used in patching operations year round. It is also a truck that is used in snow removal operations. With over 91000 miles on this truck it receives heavy use and is important to the summer patching operations. In 2027 it will be up for replacement according to the Capital Asset Policy and is recommended to be replaced with a vehicle of similar size, capabilities, and power. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 111 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-137 PROJECT NAME: #259 Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2016 GMC Sierra 4WD Reg Cab Project Justification: Truck #259 is a Parks vehicle that was purchased to accommodate narrow trails, tight turns, and general park maintenance. It has a 7'6" plow and 62,000 miles of service on the truck. When not being used for park maintenance it is used in plowing cul-de-sacs and parking lots. Operations of a plow on a 1/2 ton truck is hard on the equipment and will lead to an early failure of the truck. Recommended replacement is a short wheel base pickup truck for the purpose of navigating the trail system. 1/2 ton truck or smaller. Consider earlier replacement of this vehicle in replacement schedule. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $67,000 $0 $0 $67,000 Total $0 $0 $67,000 $0 $0 $67,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $67,000 $0 $0 $67,000 Total $0 $0 $67,000 $0 $0 $67,000 112 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-164 PROJECT NAME: #263 Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2017 F550 4X4 with Plow Project Justification: Truck #263 is an F-550 used in the streets department. It is used year-round in asphalt maintenance, plowing operations, and is generally a versatile truck in the public works operations. The truck currently has 59,000 miles on it and is scheduled for replacement in 2027 according to the capital asset policy. Recommended replacement is an F-550 or comparably sized truck with the swap loader function also called a roll off truck. By purchasing the truck this way the truck will be able to use any of the previously purchased swap loader/roll off skids allowing the truck to satisfy several needs. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 113 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-69 PROJECT NAME: #306 Investigation Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 8 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2017 Ford Fusion Project Justification: Originally scheduled for replacement in 2025 but did not meet mileage requirements. Emergency vehicles are routinely driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance- driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and our staff. Police staff are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Total $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Total $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 114 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-33 PROJECT NAME: #311 Investigation Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 8 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2017 Jeep Cherokee Project Justification: Originally scheduled for replacement in 2025 but did not meet mileage requirements. Emergency vehicles are routinely driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and our staff. Police staff are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Total $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 Total $0 $0 $62,800 $0 $0 $62,800 115 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-293 PROJECT NAME: #321 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to help ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to Ford Motor Company, each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car has approximately 5900 idle hours, which equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 116 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-294 PROJECT NAME: #322 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to help ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to Ford Motor Company, each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car has approximately 5900 idle hours, which equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 117 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-295 PROJECT NAME: #323 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to help ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to Ford Motor Company, each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car has approximately 5900 idle hours, which equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Total $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 118 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-155 PROJECT NAME: #412 Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2018 Ford F-250 Project Justification: Truck #412 purchased in 2018 is a Parks vehicle that is used in the maintenance of the parks, trails, and snow removal operations. In the summer months it hauls a trailer with a mower, weed whips, mulch, and other larger construction equipment (Skid steer/tool cat). Currently (12/2022) truck #412 has 27,000 miles and will be in need of replacement according to the capital asset policy and wear and tear on the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $72,000 Total $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $72,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $72,000 Total $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $72,000 119 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-353 PROJECT NAME: #607 Truck Project Year: 2027 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 10 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace vehicle #607 (Rescue 1) 2013 Ford F250 Project Justification: Rescue 1 is currently undersized and not able to pull wildland fire suppression equipment. Current use is soiled/contaminated fire equipment. Need to replace with at least 1 ton capacity 4-wheel drive 4 door truck. Cost reduction option would be to transition a City owned vehicle with no more than 60,000 miles to serve this role in fire fleet. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $93,700 $0 $0 $93,700 Total $0 $0 $93,700 $0 $0 $93,700 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $93,700 $0 $0 $93,700 Total $0 $0 $93,700 $0 $0 $93,700 120 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-92 PROJECT NAME: #805 Building Inspection Vehicle Project Year: 2027 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2018 Ford Escape Project Justification: Vehicle #805 is used in the transportation of inspectors to and from the inspection site. The vehicle has 39,000 miles (12/2022). Replacement is recommended by the capital asset policy based on years in service. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $32,000 Total $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $32,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $32,000 Total $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $32,000 121 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-163 PROJECT NAME: #262 Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2017 F-550 Hook Truck Project Justification: Truck #262 is an F-550 Hook Truck. Meaning the truck has the ability to switch what kind of box is on the back of the truck. Boxes or skids available for use are a standard dump box, chipper box, and brine tank which keeps the truck very versatile. Truck #262 is used in city maintenance operations year-round With 38,000 miles on the truck it is not yet showing signs or a need for replacement but according to the capital asset policy the useful life of the truck will be used up and ready for replacement in 2027. Recommended replacement is a vehicle of similar size, capabilities, and power. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $158,000 $0 $158,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $158,000 $0 $158,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $158,000 $0 $158,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $158,000 $0 $158,000 122 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-165 PROJECT NAME: #267 Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2019 Ford F250 Reg Cab 4X4 Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 123 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-70 PROJECT NAME: #307 Investigation Vehicle Project Year: 2028 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 8 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: 2017 Ford Fusion Project Justification: Originally scheduled for replacement in 2025 but did not meet mileage requirements. Emergency vehicles are routinely driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and our staff. Police staff are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $65,600 $0 $65,600 Total $0 $0 $0 $65,600 $0 $65,600 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $65,600 $0 $65,600 Total $0 $0 $0 $65,600 $0 $65,600 124 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-157 PROJECT NAME: #416 Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2019 Ford F-350 with Dumpbox Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $82,000 $0 $82,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $82,000 $0 $82,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $82,000 $0 $82,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $82,000 $0 $82,000 125 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-134 PROJECT NAME: #506 Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Utilities Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2019 Ford F250 Crew Cab Project Justification: Estimated Life: 9yrs Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $33,000 $0 $33,000 Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $0 $0 $33,000 $0 $33,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $66,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $66,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $66,000 126 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-21 PROJECT NAME: #606 Truck Project Year: 2028 Department: Fire Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Replace 1993 GMC full-size 4X4 (G21) pickup with UTV outfitted with wildland fire suppression equipment Project Justification: The current GMC 3500 grass truck was built in 1993. The use of this vehicle is to operate off road and access wild land interface fires remotely. The focus of this apparatus has changed to being used to pull a trailer with a UTV. This UTV is used to access remote areas. We need a vehicle to pull and hand well while pulling the trailer with the UTV on the trailer emergent. The replacement vehicle needs to be a one ton vehicle with a 4 person crew cab with 4 wheel drive. This four person crew would transition from the truck to the UTV to access remote fires and to use the UTV to operate from. This vehicle would also be used to haul contaminated hose and equipment from fire scene to locations were this equipment would be decontaminated. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000 127 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-93 PROJECT NAME: #806 Building Inspection Vehicle Project Year: 2028 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2019 Ford Escape Project Justification: Vehicle #806 is used in the transportation of inspectors to and from the inspection site. The vehicle has 40,XXX miles (07/2023). Replacement is recommended by the capital asset policy based on years in service. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $34,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $34,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $34,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $34,000 128 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-166 PROJECT NAME: #268 Truck Project Year: 2029 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2020 Ford F350 w/ Dumpbox Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $95,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $95,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $95,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $95,000 129 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-329 PROJECT NAME: #328 Unmarked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2029 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Ordered 2024 anticipated delivery 2025 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $ $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $ $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 130 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-330 PROJECT NAME: #329 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2029 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Ordered in 2024 anticipated delivery 2025 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 131 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-332 PROJECT NAME: #330 Marked Patrol Vehicle Project Year: 2029 Department: Police Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 5 Contact Person: Public Safety Director Project Description: Ordered 2024 anticipated delivery 2025 Project Justification: Emergency vehicles are regularly driven at the upper performance levels. Vehicles with over 100,000 miles are more likely to have transmission, suspension and engine problems. Each of these repairs increases the cost per mile to operate the vehicle. Peak mechanical and structural condition of performance-driven emergency vehicles is essential to ensure the safety of the public and officers. Officers are expected to respond to emergencies quickly, with constant due regard for public safety. As such, our emergency vehicles cannot fail. With vehicle age, comes increased risk to the driver and public due to mechanical wear, weathering from exterior parking/storage, and the effects of prolonged salt exposure. Police patrol vehicles often need to idle when in-service and not parked in an area with shore power due to the temperature sensitive medical equipment and supplies the officers carry, as well as to ensure adequate charging of the squad computer. According to General Motors (2022 Chev Tahoe owner's manual, pg. 391 - extended idle use) each hour of idling is equal to 33 miles . A five year old squad car which has approximately 5900 idle hours, equates to approximately 194,700 additional miles added to the vehicle. Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,900 $85,900 132 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-167 PROJECT NAME: #417 Truck Project Year: 2029 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2020 GMC Sierra 1500 Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 133 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-158 PROJECT NAME: #418 Truck Project Year: 2029 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 20 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2020 Ford F550 Roll-off Project Justification: After normal wear & tear it can be costly to repair Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 134 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-135 PROJECT NAME: #508 Truck Project Year: 2029 Department: Utilities Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 Crew Cab Project Justification: Estimated Life: 9yrs Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Sewer Operating Fund (602) $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,500 $33,500 Water Operating Fund (601) $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,500 $33,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $67,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $67,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $67,000 135 Capital Improvement Project 2025 through 2029 PROJECT # CW-147 PROJECT NAME: #807 Truck Project Year: 2029 Department: Fleet Program: Citywide Project Type: Vehicles Useful Life (Years): 9 Contact Person: Public Services Director Project Description: 2020 Ford F250 Project Justification: Estimated Life: 9yrs Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (402) $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $86,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $86,000 Expenditures FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total Capital Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $86,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $86,000 136 APPENDIX B Projected Cash Balance by Fund 137 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Charges for services 224,825$ 232,253$ 239,050$ 251,330$ 258,335$ Investment earnings 24,098 26,608 7,903 7,684 7,586 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 248,923 258,861 246,953 259,014 265,921 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay 452,000 6,400,000 - - - Debt service Principal - - 148,862 153,328 157,928 Interest - - 120,000 115,534 110,934 Total Expenditures 452,000 6,400,000 268,862 268,862 268,862 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (203,077) (6,141,139) (21,909) (9,848) (2,941) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - Bond proceeds - 4,000,000 - - - Sale of capital assets --- - - Interfund loan activity 454,151 270,643 - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)454,151 4,270,643 - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 251,074 (1,870,496) (21,909) (9,848) (2,941) Cash Balances, January 1 2,409,754 2,660,828 790,332 768,423 758,576 Cash Balances, December 31 2,660,828$ 790,332$ 768,423$ 758,576$ 755,634$ City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Building and Facilities Fund Fund 401 138 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes 810,000$ 972,000$ 1,166,400$ 1,399,680$ 1,500,000$ Property taxes - fire water tenders 221,565 219,533 217,500 215,467 213,435 Investment earnings 2,882 5,634 3,017 1,077 8,252 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 1,034,447 1,197,167 1,386,917 1,616,224 1,721,687 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay 694,715 1,308,800 1,494,300 832,600 1,030,700 Fire water tenders - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 694,715 1,308,800 1,494,300 832,600 1,030,700 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 339,732 (111,633) (107,383) 783,624 690,987 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets 157,033 69,472 130,880 149,430 83,260 Interfund loan activity (221,565) (219,533) (217,500) (215,467) (213,435) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)(64,532) (150,062) (86,620) (66,037) (130,175) Net Change in Cash Balance 275,200 (261,695) (194,003) 717,587 560,812 Cash Balances, January 1 288,154 563,353 301,658 107,655 825,241 Cash Balances, December 31 563,353$ 301,658$ 107,655$ 825,241$ 1,386,054$ City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Capital Equipment Replacement Fund Fund 402 139 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ Investment earnings 551 504 507 572 682 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 25,551 25,504 25,507 25,572 25,682 Expenditures Current 30,300 25,150 19,050 14,550 15,300 Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 30,300 25,150 19,050 14,550 15,300 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (4,749) 354 6,457 11,022 10,382 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance (4,749) 354 6,457 11,022 10,382 Cash Balances, January 1 55,143 50,395 50,749 57,206 68,228 Cash Balances, December 31 50,395$ 50,749$ 57,206$ 68,228$ 78,610$ City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Office Equipment Replacement Fund Fund 403 140 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Intergovernmental -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Charges for services - - - - - Investment earnings 7,371 7,445 5,449 5,504 5,559 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 7,371 7,445 5,449 5,504 5,559 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay - 207,000 - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures - 207,000 - - - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 7,371 (199,555) 5,449 5,504 5,559 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 7,371 (199,555) 5,449 5,504 5,559 Cash Balances, January 1 737,091 744,462 544,907 550,356 555,860 Cash Balances, December 31 744,462$ 544,907$ 550,356$ 555,860$ 561,418$ City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Park Dedication Fund Fund 405 141 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Area & Unit Trunk Fund Fund 406 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Special assessments 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Intergovernmental - - - - - Charges for services - - - - - Investment earnings 74,931 65,155 57,499 49,423 36,716 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 1,074,931 1,065,155 1,057,499 1,049,423 1,036,716 Expenditures Current 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Capital outlay 4,508,750 4,103,038 4,902,795 1,035,000 60,000 Debt service Principal 349,190 799,647 936,087 1,166,347 1,192,858 Interest 319,924 394,647 473,902 569,960 542,509 Total Expenditures 5,197,864 5,317,332 6,332,784 2,791,307 1,815,367 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (4,122,933) (4,252,177) (5,275,285) (1,741,884) (778,651) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in 768,700 785,200 919,348 818,200 834,700 Transfers out (623,388) (498,600) (343,300) (347,000) (345,200) Bond proceeds (1)3,000,000 3,200,000 3,891,600 - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)3,145,312 3,486,600 4,467,648 471,200 489,500 Net Change in Cash Balance (977,621) (765,577) (807,637) (1,270,684) (289,151) Cash Balances, January 1 7,493,087 6,515,466 5,749,888 4,942,251 3,671,567 Cash Balances, December 31 6,515,466$ 5,749,888$ 4,942,251$ 3,671,567$ 3,382,416$ (1) Bond proceeds for: 2025 - Otter Lake Road Extension 2026 - Public Works Facility 2027 - West Side Relief to Lakeview Drive and Sewer Districts 2E, 2F, 2I, 2J 142 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance T.I.F District 1-11 Fund Fund 418 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Tax increment 458,151$ 467,314$ 476,661$ -$ -$ Investment earnings - - - - - Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 458,151 467,314 476,661 - - Expenditures Current 4,000 4,000 110,222 - - Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 4,000 4,000 110,222 - - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 454,151 463,314 366,439 - - Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity (454,151) (463,314) (366,439) - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)(454,151) (463,314) (366,439) - - Net Change in Cash Balance - - - - - Cash Balances, January 10 0 0 0 0 Cash Balances, December 31 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 143 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance T.I.F District 1-12 Fund Fund 419 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Tax increment -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Investment earnings 4,060 4,061 4,062 4,062 4,063 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 4,060 4,061 4,062 4,062 4,063 Expenditures Current 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 60 61 62 62 63 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Developer PAYGO activity - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 60 61 62 62 63 Cash Balances, January 1 406,043 406,104 406,165 406,226 406,289 Cash Balances, December 31 406,104$ 406,165$ 406,226$ 406,289$ 406,351$ 144 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Municipal State Aid (MSA) Construction Fund Fund 420 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Special assessments 66,328$ 63,388$ 9,597$ -$ -$ Intergovernmental MSA 828,555 845,126 862,029 879,269 896,855 Other federal/state funding - - - - - Charges for services - - - - - Investment earnings 53,319 50,451 56,910 52,197 58,381 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 948,202 958,965 928,536 931,466 955,236 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay 5,892,500 - 1,086,750 - - Debt service Principal - 173,332 178,532 183,888 189,404 Interest - 139,725 134,525 129,169 123,652 Total Expenditures 5,892,500 313,057 1,399,807 313,057 313,056 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (4,944,298) 645,908 (471,271) 618,409 642,180 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds 4,657,500 - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)4,657,500 - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance (286,798) 645,908 (471,271) 618,409 642,180 Cash Balances, January 1 5,331,867 5,045,068 5,690,976 5,219,705 5,838,114 Cash Balances, December 31 5,045,068$ 5,690,976$ 5,219,705$ 5,838,114$ 6,480,294$ 145 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Pavement Management Fund Fund 421 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes 1,138,500$ 1,309,300$ 1,505,700$ 1,731,500$ 1,991,225$ Investment earnings 1,726 1,743 1,761 1,778 1,796 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 1,140,226 1,311,043 1,507,461 1,733,278 1,993,021 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay 1,138,500 1,309,300 1,505,700 1,731,500 1,991,225 Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,138,500 1,309,300 1,505,700 1,731,500 1,991,225 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,726 1,743 1,761 1,778 1,796 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 1,726 1,743 1,761 1,778 1,796 Cash Balances, January 1 172,600 174,326 176,069 177,830 179,608 Cash Balances, December 31 174,326$ 176,069$ 177,830$ 179,608$ 181,404$ 146 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Surface Water Management Fund Fund 422 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Special assessments 98,533$ 95,115$ 91,626$ 88,192$ 84,751$ Intergovernmental - - - - - Charges for services 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Investment earnings 13,175 14,522 11,222 8,320 4,386 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 361,709 359,638 352,848 346,512 339,137 Expenditures Current 20,000 123,500 20,000 123,500 20,000 Capital outlay 4,568,000 97,500 161,000 161,000 150,000 Debt service Principal - 38,518 39,673 40,864 42,089 Interest - 31,050 29,894 28,704 27,478 Total Expenditures 4,588,000 290,568 250,567 354,068 239,567 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (4,226,291) 69,070 102,281 (7,556) 99,570 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds 1,035,000 - - - - Sale of capital assets (1)- - - - - Interfund loan activity (2)3,326,000 (399,120) (392,468) (385,816) (379,164) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)4,361,000 (399,120) (392,468) (385,816) (379,164) Net Change in Cash Balance 134,709 (330,050) (290,187) (393,372) (279,594) Cash Balances, January 1 1,317,531 1,452,240 1,122,190 832,003 438,631 Cash Balances, December 31 1,452,240$ 1,122,190$ 832,003$ 438,631$ 159,037$ (1) No assumptions have been made in regards to the sale of wetland credits. (2) An interfund loan may be considered to help fund Wetland Bank No. 3 in 2025. 147 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Special assessments 10,610$ 740$ -$ -$ -$ Intergovernmental - - - - - Investment earnings 4,672 4,825 4,880 4,929 4,978 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 15,282 5,564 4,880 4,929 4,978 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 15,282 5,564 4,880 4,929 4,978 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 15,282 5,564 4,880 4,929 4,978 Cash Balances, January 1 467,181 482,464 488,028 492,908 497,837 Cash Balances, December 31 482,464$ 488,028$ 492,908$ 497,837$ 502,816$ City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Street Reconstruction Fund Fund 423 148 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Park & Trail Improvements Fund Fund 425 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes 90,000$ 180,000$ 252,000$ 352,800$ 500,000$ Investment earnings 1,483 2,398 4,222 6,784 10,380 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 91,483 182,398 256,222 359,584 510,380 Expenditures Current - - - - - Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - - Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 91,483 182,398 256,222 359,584 510,380 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 91,483 182,398 256,222 359,584 510,380 Cash Balances, January 1 148,272 239,755 422,152 678,374 1,037,958 Cash Balances, December 31 239,755$ 422,152$ 678,374$ 1,037,958$ 1,548,337$ 149 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance T.I.F District 1-13 Fund Fund 430 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Tax increment 483,022$ 492,682$ 502,536$ 512,587$ 522,838$ Investment earnings 150 353 563 780 1,004 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 483,172 493,035 503,099 513,366 523,842 Expenditures Current 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 479,172 489,035 499,099 509,366 519,842 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Developer PAYGO activity (458,871) (468,048) (477,409) (486,957) (496,696) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)(458,871) (468,048) (477,409) (486,957) (496,696) Net Change in Cash Balance 20,301 20,987 21,689 22,409 23,146 Cash Balances, January 1 14,981 35,282 56,269 77,959 100,368 Cash Balances, December 31 35,282$ 56,269$ 77,959$ 100,368$ 123,513$ 150 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Comp Plan Updates Fund Fund 484 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Property taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Intergovernmental - - 16,000 - - Investment earnings 432 686 943 (37) 12 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 432 686 16,943 (37) 12 Expenditures Current - - 140,000 20,000 20,000 Capital outlay - - - - - Debt service Principal - - - - - Interest - - - - - Total Expenditures - - 140,000 20,000 20,000 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 432 686 (123,057) (20,037) (19,988) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Net Change in Cash Balance 25,432 25,686 (98,057) 4,963 5,012 Cash Balances, January 1 43,190 68,622 94,308 (3,749) 1,214 Cash Balances, December 31 68,622$ 94,308$ (3,749)$ 1,214$ 6,226$ 151 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Water Operating Fund Fund 601 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Charges for services (fixed/REU)768,700$ 785,200$ 801,700$ 818,200$ 834,700$ Charges for services (volume)1,578,774 1,671,765 1,769,733 1,872,928 1,981,610 Hook-up charges 41,250 41,250 41,250 41,250 41,250 Water meter sales 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 Investment earnings 60,000 51,469 53,643 51,588 50,694 Miscellaneous 6,800 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total Revenues 2,540,524 2,644,684 2,761,326 2,878,966 3,003,254 Expenditures Current 1,440,132 1,512,139 1,587,746 1,667,133 1,750,489 Capital outlay 861,000 3,330,000 362,250 268,000 33,500 Debt service Principal - - 119,090 122,663 126,343 Interest - - 96,000 92,427 88,747 Total Expenditures 2,301,132 4,842,139 2,165,086 2,150,223 1,999,079 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 239,392 (2,197,454) 596,240 728,743 1,004,174 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out (768,700) (785,200) (801,700) (818,200) (834,700) Bond proceeds - 3,200,000 - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)(768,700) 2,414,800 (801,700) (818,200) (834,700) Net Change in Cash Balance (529,308) 217,346 (205,460) (89,457) 169,474 Cash Balances, January 1 5,676,238 5,146,930 5,364,276 5,158,816 5,069,359 Cash Balances, December 31 5,146,930$ 5,364,276$ 5,158,816$ 5,069,359$ 5,238,833$ 152 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Sewer Operating Fund Fund 602 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Charges for services 2,106,925$ 2,203,739$ 2,305,077$ 2,411,150$ 2,522,179$ Hook-up charges 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Investment earnings 70,000 27,024 33,065 38,759 39,458 Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Revenues 2,209,925 2,263,763 2,371,142 2,482,909 2,594,637 Expenditures Current 2,324,752 2,440,990 2,563,039 2,691,191 2,825,751 Capital outlay 1,521,000 3,230,000 - 108,000 81,500 Debt service Principal - - 119,090 122,663 126,343 Interest - - 96,000 92,427 88,747 Total Expenditures 3,845,752 5,670,990 2,778,129 3,014,281 3,122,341 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,635,827) (3,407,226) (406,987) (531,372) (527,703) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Bond proceeds - 3,200,000 - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - - Interfund loan activity (3,104,435) 811,324 976,407 601,283 592,599 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)(3,104,435) 4,011,324 976,407 601,283 592,599 Net Change in Cash Balance (4,740,262) 604,097 569,420 69,911 64,895 Cash Balances, January 1 7,442,674 2,702,413 3,306,510 3,875,930 3,945,841 Cash Balances, December 31 2,702,413$ 3,306,510$ 3,875,930$ 3,945,841$ 4,010,736$ 153 City of Lino Lakes 2025-2029 Financial Plan Projected Cash Balance Storm Water Operating Fund Fund 603 2025 2026 2027 2028 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Revenues Charges for services 551,540$ 559,220$ 566,900$ 574,580$ Investment earnings 3,000 3,901 1,008 1,254 Miscellaneous - - - - Total Revenues 554,540 563,121 567,908 575,834 Expenditures Current 512,098 527,461 543,285 559,583 Capital outlay - 325,000 - - Debt service Principal - - - - Interest - - - - Total Expenditures 512,098 852,461 543,285 559,583 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 42,442 (289,340) 24,623 16,251 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - Transfers out - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - Sale of capital assets - - - - Interfund loan activity - - - - Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)- - - - Net Change in Cash Balance 42,442 (289,340) 24,623 16,251 Cash Balances, January 1 347,658 390,100 100,760 125,383 Cash Balances, December 31 390,100$ 100,760$ 125,383$ 141,634$ 154 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Hannah Lynch, Finance Director MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-170, Committing General Fund Balance VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The Council is being asked to commit unspent and available General Fund budget dollars from 2024 to be used in 2025. BACKGROUND The 2024 General Fund Budget includes $17,500 within Fire Uniforms for three sets of fire turn out protective gear. An order for the turn out gear was placed in early fall 2024, although staff has been informed by the vendor, MacQueen Equipment, that delivery will not be made until February 2025. Staff recommends committing the funds within the General Fund. Committed funds will allow the use of the 2024 budgeted funds in fiscal year 2025 without having a 2025 budget impact. Funds can only be spent for the reason specified. Any unspent funds will no longer be committed after the expenditure for turn out gear has been made. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 24-170, Committing General Fund Balance. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 24-170 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-170 COMMITTING GENERAL FUND BALANCE WHEREAS, fund balance is comprised of distinct components with distinct purposes. Under GASB 54, cities need to report five different components of fund balance to the Office of the State Auditor each year; a) nonspendable, b) restricted, c) committed, d) assigned, and e) unassigned; and WHEREAS, the City Council may set aside funds for a specific purpose by committing funds; and WHEREAS, funds were budgeted, but left unspent in the General Fund in 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that $17,500 will be committed within the General Fund for fire turn out gear ordered in 2024, but not anticipated to be received until February 2025. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Spargur Estates i. Consider Resolution No. 24-156 Approving Variances ii. Consider Resolution No. 24-157 Approving Preliminary Plat VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration of the above noted items. Review Deadline: Complete Application Date: September 9, 2024 60-Day Deadline: November 8, 2024 60-Day Extension: January 7, 2024 Environmental Board Meeting: September 25, 2024 Park Board Meeting: NA Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: October 9, 2024 November 13, 2024 City Council Work Session: December 2, 2024 City Council Meeting: December 9, 2024 The applicant, Mespargur Inc, submitted a complete land use application for variances and preliminary plat for Spargur Estates. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel located at 559 Lois Lane into three (3) single family lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family detached dwellings. This staff report is based on the following submittal information: • Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 2 • Drainage Report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 • Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company dated August 23, 2024 • Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated October 2, 2024 BACKGROUND The lot is legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Mar Don Acres. History Mar Don Acres Mar Don Acres was originally platted in 1978. As part of that plat, eight (8) lots were created north of Lois Lane with each lot being 294.00 feet in depth and approximately 165 feet in width with lot sizes of 48,510 sq. ft. Houses were purposely located on the lots in a manner so that the lot could further subdivided when public water and sewer become available. Three (3) other residential subdivisions similar to the proposed Spargur Estates have since been approved from these 8 lots. Hailey Manor Hailey Manor subdivided Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 12 single family residential lots (3 original lots subdivided into 4 lots each for a total of 12 lots). The parcel was rezoned and variances were allowed for 132 foot lot depths vs 135 foot required due to required 30 foot right of way dedication along Arlo Lane. The following actions were approved in 2006/2007 by City Council regarding Hailey Manor: • Resolution No. 03-120 for Variance and Preliminary Plat • Ordinance No. 16-03 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family • Resolution No. 03-208 for Final Plat This plat is directly east of the proposed Spargur Estates. Isabell Estates Isabell Estates subdivided Lot 3, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential lots. The following actions were approved by the City Council in 2014 regarding Isabell Estates: • Resolution No. 14-66 approving variances for lot depth, lot width and side setback • Resolution No. 14-67 approving the Preliminary Plat • Resolution No. 14-114 approving the Final Plat 3 This plat is west of the proposed Spargur Estates. Golden Acre Golden Acre subdivided Lot 4, Block 1, Mar Don Acres into 4 single family residential lots. The parcel was rezoned and variances were also approved allowing for 132 foot deep lots, lot width reduction and side yard setback reduction due to required right of way dedication and location of existing house on the lot. The following actions were approved by City Council regarding Golden Acre: • Resolution No. 06-181 for Variances and Preliminary Plat • Ordinance No. 11-06 for Rezoning from R, Rural to R-1, Single Family • Resolution No. 07-103 for Final Plat This plat is immediately west of the proposed Spargur Estates. Existing Site Conditions The 1 acre site is a residential lot containing a single family detached dwelling and attached garage. Other than trees and shrubs, there are no significant natural resources on site. The Certificate of Survey indicates a Soderville fine sand and Zimmerman fine sand on the property. Zoning Current Zoning R-1, Single Family Residential Current Land Use Rural Residential Future Land Use per CP Low Density Sewered Residential (1.6 to 3.0 units per acre) Utility Staging Area 1A = 2018-2025 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use North R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential South R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential West R-1, Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential 4 ANALYSIS Density and Land Area Calculations The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Gross Area (acres) 1.11 Wetlands & Water Bodies 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other 0.00 Net Area (acres) 1.11 # of Units 3 Gross Density (units/acre) 2.70 Net Density (units/acre) 2.70 Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Requirements Zoning requirements and standards of the R-1 Single Family Residential District apply to this subdivision. R-1 Requirements Proposed Lot 1 (existing house) Lot 2 Lot 3 Min. Lot Size 10,800 sf 21,780 sf 10,890 sf 10,890 sf Min. Lot Width 80 ft 165 ft 82.50 ft 82.50 ft Min. Lot Depth 135 ft 132a ft 132a ft 132a ft Building Setback -From Streets 30 ft 38.9 ft 30 ft 30 ft 5 Lois Ln and Arlo Ln (Both Minor Collector) -Rear --Principal 30 ft 49.3 ft 30 ft 30 ft --Accessory 5 ft 23 ft 5 ft 5 ft -Side --Principal 10 ft 90 ft 10 ft 10 ft --Accessory 5 ft 7.3 ft 5 ft 5 ft Impervious Surface 65% 17.6% TBD w/ building permit TBD w/ building permit aVariances are required for the lot depths. Building Requirements At the time of building permit, the single family detached dwellings proposed on Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be reviewed for compliance regarding impervious surface, building footprint area, garage size, and design and construction standards. Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The preliminary plat has been reviewed for compliance with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan. It does meet the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance with the approved variances. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat creates 1 block with 3 lots. Lot 1, Block 1 will contain the existing house which will remain on site. Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be developed with single family detached dwellings. Streets and Alleys Arlo Lane is a minor collector road and is capable of handling two (2) additional single family detached dwellings. 6 Easements Standard drainage and utility easements are being dedicated along the lot lines. Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The proposed development does not require a stormwater management plan under City Code Chapter 1011. Per the Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations report revision date October 15, 2024, a small rear yard depression is shown to help get drainage from west to east. This basin overflows to the east to match existing conditions. It is assumed the basin will drain dry between storm events. Public Utilities The existing house at 559 Lois Lane is connected to public watermain and sanitary sewer. The two (2) new lots will also be connected to public water and sanitary which is capable of handling two (2) single family detached dwellings. Water and sanitary sewer laterals are already stubbed into the two (2) proposed lots. Public Land Dedication The proposed subdivision is within the Highland Meadow Park neighborhood service area. The development is not within the greenway system. Arlo Lane is identified as a future trail corridor that is proposed to extend from Highland Meadows Park to Woodduck Trail and eventually to 4th Avenue. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Lot 1 with the existing house will not be charged a park dedication fee. Park Dedication Fees Total # of Lots = 2 x 2024 Park Dedication Fee $3,300 = Total Due $6,600 Tree Preservation and Landscaping A tree survey was performed that identified: Total Trees 19 Total Trees Removed 2 Total Trees Preserved 17 Mitigation Trees Required 0 7 19 trees were identified in the tree inventory, with 2 proposed for removal. Seven (7) or the remaining 17 are located off site along the western property line of lot 3. The 17 trees planned for preservation must have Tree Protection Zones installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence Detail. The Tree Protection Zones need to be shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Landscape Plan. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met. Open Areas Landscape Standards Open areas standards do not apply to single family residential lots. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. The project property and surrounding properties are zoned R1, so buffer and screen standards do not apply. Canopy Cover Canopy cover standards to not apply to single family residential development. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. The ground cover types and locations must be added to the Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and the Landscape Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The three (3) unattached residential units are under the 250 unattached unit threshold required for a mandatory EAW. Wetlands 8 There are no wetlands on site. FEMA Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Shoreland Management Overlay The parcel is not located within a Shoreland Management Overly district. Impervious Surface Coverage The maximum allowed impervious surface coverage per lot is 65%. Lot 1 (existing house) is at 17.6% and compliant. The impervious coverage for Lots 2 and 3 will be evaluated with those individual building permits and surveys. Traffic Study A traffic study is not required for two (2) new single family lots on Arlo Lane. It is a minor collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached dwellings. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Public Safety Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety Department-Police Division and Fire Division reviewed the preliminary plat and had no comments. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their September 25, 2024 meeting and noted some with minor revisions are needed. The Environmental Coordinator reviewed the revised plans. Comments are summarized in the attached November 1, 2024 Environmental memo. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on October 9, 2024. The original preliminary plat proposed four (4) lots; however, it did not meet density requirements. The Board continued the hearing to November 14, 2024 to allow the applicant time to revise the plans to three (3) lots. There were no public comments. The Board recommended approval of the variances and preliminary plat. Agreements 9 Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A stormwater maintenance agreement is not required since a stormwater management plan is not required per City Code Chapter 1010. Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Comprehensive Plan Spargur Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding land use, density, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan Per the current 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided low density residential development and allows for 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre. The proposed net density of 2.70 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is in Planning District 2 and is guided for low density residential development. There are no specific planning recommendations for this site. Housing Plan A goal of the housing plan is to maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. It is a policy to encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Spargur Estates meets the goals of the housing plan by supporting in-fill housing. Economic Development The three (3) lot single family residential development does not negatively impact the City’s economic development plan. Transportation Plan A goal of the transportation plan is to ensure that streets are as safe as possible. Arlo Lane is a minor collector street and has capacity for two (2) single family detached dwellings. 10 Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems. Spargur Estates protects the natural surface and groundwater storage with the construction of a small rear yard depression. Erosion and sediment control practices will also be implemented. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The existing house is served by an 8” municipal sanitary sewer main along Lois Lane. The two (2) new lots will be served by 8” municipal sanitary sewer along Arlo Lane. The existing sanitary sewer system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached dwellings. Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The existing house is served by an 8” municipal watermain along Lois Lane. The two (2) new lots will be served by 8” municipal watermain along Arlo Lane. The existing water supply system has capacity for two (2) new single family detached dwellings. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the two (2) new lots. Findings of Fact Resolution No. 24-156 details the findings of fact for the variances. Resolution No. 24-157 details the findings of fact for the preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATION Staff and Boards recommend approval of the Spargur Estates variances and preliminary plat. 11 ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 3. City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024 4. Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024 5. Resolution No. 24-156 6. Resolution No. 24-157 W o o dd uc k Trl M y r t l e L n Lois Ln No tting h am L n Arlo Ln Meadow View T rl Jo s e p h C t Highland Trl Myrtle Ln Highland Meadows Park Lois Ln Arlo Ln Co u n t ry L n Legend Address Labels Parcels October 2, 2024m Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 200 Ft Spargur EstatesƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ ϭ͗ ^ŝƚĞ >ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ Θ ĞƌŝĂů aĂƉ HOUSE GARAGE 60 CANT. EXISTING 909.1 909.0 MBOX5 911.1 910.1 SIGN 30 30 30 30 HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE GARAGEHOUSEEXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE SHED EXISTING HOUSEEXISTING GARAGE PORTABLE SMOKE HOUSE 38 . 9 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLAT OF MAR DON ACRES 30 30 5 5 5 5 1010 DEC K ST E P S 907.1 SB#4 907.9 SB#3 907.5 SB#2 909.2 SB#1 (22" x 34") S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM 1 INCH = 30 FEET HORIZONTAL 30 0 15 30 60 VICINITY MAP ( NOT TO SCALE ) DEVELOPER ME SPARGUR INC. 12952 96TH ST NE OTSEGO, MN 55330 MITCH SPARGUR 952-412-6760 MITCH@MITCHSPARGUR.COM ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. 651-361-8234 ADAM@PLOWE.COM TITLE SHEET SPARGUR ESTATES LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA SURVEYOR E.G. RUD & SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 JASON RUD 651-361-8225 JRUD@EGRUD.COM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C0 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . TI T L E S H E E T PR E L I M I N A R Y NO R T H 24-2164 SHEET INDEX CO TITLE SHEET GRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC PLANC1.1 S1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY WITH RESOURCE INVENTORY MAP S2 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1.2 UTILITY PLAN C1.3 C2.1 REMOVALS PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN ALL PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERMITS FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES, MNDOT, AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ORDERING OF MATERIAL AND STARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. NO INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED UNTIL ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS ARE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND CITY STANDARDS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING STANDARDS. S3 TREE INVENTORY WITH REMOVALS DETAILSC3.1 SITE DE S C R I P T I O N 10 . 1 5 . 2 4 Attachment 2: Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 HOUSE GARAGE 60 EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 909.3 909.6 908.0 907.8 908.2 908.9 909.5 912.2 EXISTING 909.1 909.2 904.7 906.9 909.60 TC 909.6 909.2 909.3 909.3 907.5 907.3 907.2 907.0 906.5 906.9 908.3 909.690 6 . 9 90 7 . 4 909.1 909.7 90 9 . 0 90 9 . 1 90 7 . 0 90 7 . 2 90 8 . 7 91 0 . 9 91 0 . 0 90 8 . 7 90 7 . 0 90 7 . 7 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 5 908.7 909.0 MBOX5 908.70 TC 908.66 TC 909.1 910.4 911.9 911.9 911.9 910.1 908.42 EBIT TC 908.44 TC 908.87 TC 909.0 CS 907.6 907.1 906.6 906.8 906.8 907.0 906.9 907.1 907.5 908.9908.9 908.95 TC 909.17 TC 909.3 908.0 907.0 907.3 907.1 907.4 907.7 909.30 TC 909.12 TC 909.40 TC 909.5 908.5 908.0 907.3 907.2 907.1 907.5 907.9 908.0 908.2 907.7 907.3 907.0 907.6 908.3 909.1 909.8 909.50 TC 909.68 TC 909.6 909.5 908.6 908.2 908.1 908.1 908.3 908.0 908.6 909.2 909.2 909.1 909.1908.9 909.3 909.66 TC 909.37 TC 909.47 TC 909.7 909.32 TC 909.3 909.9 909.1 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 2 90 9 . 4 910.3 910.2 910.0 91 0 . 0 90 9 . 1 90 9 . 4 90 9 . 5 90 9 . 5 910.3 910.7 90 9 . 5 90 9 . 3 90 9 . 4 90 9 . 1 90 9 . 0 909.0 90 8 . 5 908.2 908.1 908.0 907.2 907.0 907.4 907.9 908.1 907.7 907.0 907.0 908.1 907.1 907.9 908.3 908.6 908.2 908.1 908.6 910.9 910.2 90 8 . 3 908.0 90 8 . 2 90 8 . 3 90 8 . 5 910.8 911.1 911.6 910.7 3212 908.9 SPRUCE 6 91 1 . 3 911.9 90 9 . 9 90 8 . 8 3217 908.8 OAK 6 3218 908.9 OAK 6 3219 909.2 ASH 10 90 8 . 9 90 9 . 0 911.0 91 0 . 2 CS910.2 909.94 EBIT TC 909.81 TC 910.1 SIGN 3231 909.5 PINE 6 3232 909.4 COTTONWOOD 16 3233 909.4 OAK 8 909.9 909.89 TC 908.8 90 8 . 1 908.6 908.6 910.6 909.2 906.3 909.46 TC CS 909.4 CS909.0 CS 909.3 907.2 907.1 907.2 3500 909.9 MAPLE30 909.3 909.5 909.9 910.4 909.5 909.4 910.0 3508 910.3 MAPLE22 910.0 908.9 3511 907.8 PINE16 907.2 907.1 907.1 907.1 907.0 907.2 3520 907.2 SPRUCE12 90 6 . 8 906.9 3523 907.5 SPRUCE16 3524 909.1 CRAB9 90 9 . 2 9 1 0 . 4 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 4 910 . 9 90 9 . 9 91 0 . 2 909.9 91 0 . 9 910.0 911.0 910. 2 910.7 910.4 910.0 909.9 910.4 910.6910.3 910.5 910.7 910.8910.8 91 0 . 7 910.9 910.8 910.9 91 0 . 5 910.1 909.7 910.4 910.6 910.9 9 1 0 . 9 916.8 FFE 3571 908.9 MAPLE18 3572 908.1 MAPLE18 908.3 907.0 EFIREPIT 907.2 EFIREPIT 3578 910.7 MAPLE34 909.8 909.4 909.3909 . 3 911.3910.2 909.25 TC 909.08 TC 909.05 TC 909.18 TC 909.18 TC 909.3 910.0 910.3 911.2 FFE-GAR 910.8 910.5 909.6 3610 910.2 CRAB10 911.9 911.2 911.0 910.8 910.9 911.9 912.3 DOOR-FFE+- 91 0 . 4 91 0 . 9 91 1 . 1 91 0 . 2 91 0 . 2 91 0 . 9 91 0 . 2 9 1 1 . 0 91 0 . 3 909.9910 . 6 91 0 . 1 90 9 . 9 90 9 . 6 90 9 . 2 909.1 909.4 91 0 . 4 91 1 . 3 910.8 91 0 . 4 90 9 . 7 91 0 . 1 91 1 . 6 911.0 910.0 909.3909.14 EBIT-TC 909.01 TC 90 9 9 1 0 909 908 907 907 908 909 91 0 90 9 907 908 91 0 91 1 91 0 908 907 90 9 9 0 8 911 910 909 CO 909.54 SANSVC 909.46 MHSAN HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE GARAGEHOUSE EXISTING 90 5 906 907 908 908 909 906 907 908 909 908 909 910 HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE 908.90 MHSAN SHED EXISTING 91 0 909 908 904 HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE PORTABLE SMOKE HOUSE EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 0.6 0.5 3.5 WEST FACE OF RETAINING WALL ON OR NEAR LOT LINE 6.0 9.1 3.2 FENCE 907.1 SB#4 907.9 SB#3 907.5 SB#2 909.2 SB#1 8.3 7.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE 909.2 909.3 EDGE OF LANDSCAPING 910.7 910.8 REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA. NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS. S.E.W.O. LOW ENTRY = 909.4 LOW FLOOR = 909.4 60.00 60 . 0 0 60 . 0 0 60.00 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 1. 5 % PROVIDE EXTRA DEPTH FOOTINGS AND EXPOSE FOUNDATION (TYP) EOF: 907.2 1. 5 % HWL 907.4 DW Y 6. 7 % DW Y 7. 6 % FRONT GAR 912.5 909 LOW ENTRY = 909.4 LOW FLOOR = 909.4 FRONT GAR 912.5 9 1 0 91 0 S.E.W.O. 906.8906.8 FILL FRONTAGE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO CURB MOVE BUILDING TO BE AT LEAST 5-FT FROM PROPERTY LINE RELOCATE FIRE PIT TO BE: (A) AT LEAST 20-FT FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES (B) AT LEAST 25-FT FROM ALL STRUCTURES 1. 5 % RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY SEED MIX - ONCE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, LOT TO BE PROVIDED WITH SOD TREE PROTECTION FENCING (TYP) EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL (GEN-27) - TYP. REMOVE TOPSOIL AND REPLACE WITH MIX OF 70% SAND / 30% TOPSOIL PROVIDE BIOROLLS TO PROTECT BASIN FROM SEDIMENT 907 907 90 7 90 7 2. 0 % 908908 909 909 9 1 0 90 9 908 90 7 91 0 912 912 908 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 909.65 908.50 909.00 910.00 908.00 907.50 910.30 909.10 910.40 2. 0 % 910 GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBL DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W LEGEND DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES PAVER SURFACE S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.1 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E & E S C P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2164 (22" x 34") NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. PHASE I: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 2. PROVIDE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 3.1. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. 3.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 3.3. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN-PLACE UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 3.4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL FOR ANY SLOPES THAT APPEAR TO BE FAILING. (NOTE: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MUST HAVE NON-FIXED JOINTS AND BE FULLY BIODEGRADABLE; ANY BLANKET NETTING MUST BE LOOSE-WEAVE.) 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 5. PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FENCING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL (GEN-27). 6. PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA-BY-AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. 6.1. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 7. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES TO ENSURE THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INPLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 8. STABILIZE SOIL STOCKPILES; STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY. 9. FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SWEEP/SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS WHEN MATERIALS OR DEBRIS HAVE WASHED/FLOWED ONTO ADJACENT STREETS OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. PHASE II: 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEED FOR DISTURBED AREAS. 2. INSTALL RIP-RAP AT FLARED-END SECTIONS (AS APPLICABLE). 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLET STRUCTURES IN PAVING AREAS (AS APPLICABLE.) 4. INSTALL UTILITIES INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, STORM SEWER. 5. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND/OR SOD. 6. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONLY AFTER SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. ** SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY BIODEGRADABLE, NON FIXED JOINT FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. * MOW A MINIMUM OF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - ONCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF - ONCE PER 4 WEEKS 3885 (CATEGORY 2)WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3881FERTILIZER 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED)MULCH * FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT ITEM 3876SEED ** 3878SOD MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY MNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE)FALL COVER MNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE)SPRING/SUMMER MNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE)1-2 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE)2-5 YEARS COVER COMMERCIAL TURF RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE)SOIL-BUILDING COVER 3884HYDROMULCH REVEGETATION SPECIFICATIONS TIMING FOR EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL R Call before you dig. below.Know what's SITE AREA = 48,510 SF AREA OF DISTURBANCE = 27,000 SF = 0.62 ACRES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 6,258 SF * NEW & RECONSTRUCTED IMPERVIOUS LOT 2 DRIVEWAY *= 1,210 SF LOT 2 HOUSE / PATIO = 2,000 SF LOT 3 DRIVEWAY *= 1,210 SF LOT 3 HOUSE / PATIO = 2,000 SF TOTAL = 6,420 SF * INCLUDES INSIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY GRADING INFORMATION DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION909.65 DE S C R I P T I O N 10 . 1 5 . 2 4 HOUSE GARAGE 60 EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 909.3 909.6 908.0 907.8 908.2 908.9 909.5 912.2 EXISTING 909.1 909.2 909.05 FNDIP1/2 908.69 FNDIP1/2 904.7 906.9 906.84 FNDIP12294 907.3 5 FND I P C A P - U N D E R R O O T 909.48 FNDIP17765 908.52 FNDIP17765 909.60 TC 909.6 909.2 909.3 909.3 907.5 907.3 907.2 907.0 906.5 906.9 908.3 909.690 6 . 9 90 7 . 4 909.1 909.7 90 9 . 0 90 9 . 1 90 7 . 0 90 7 . 2 90 8 . 7 91 0 . 9 91 0 . 0 90 8 . 7 90 7 . 0 90 7 . 7 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 5 908.7 909.0 MBOX5 908.70 TC 908.66 TC 909.1 910.4 911.9 911.9 911.9 910.1 908.42 EBIT TC 908.44 TC 908.87 TC 909.0 CS 907.6 907.1 906.6 906.8 906.8 907.0 906.9 907.1 907.5 908.9908.9 908.95 TC 909.17 TC 909.3 908.0 907.0 907.3 907.1 907.4 907.7 3106 908.5 MAPLE 6 909.30 TC 909.12 TC 3111 908.5 MAPLE 6 909.40 TC 909.5 908.5 908.0 907.3 907.2 907.1 907.5 907.9 908.0 908.2 907.7 907.3 907.0 907.6 908.3 909.1 909.8 909.50 TC 909.68 TC 909.6 909.5 908.6 908.2 908.1 908.1 908.3 908.0 908.6 909.2 909.2 909.1 909.1908.9 909.3 909.66 TC 909.37 TC 909.47 TC 909.7 909.32 TC 909.3 909.9 909.1 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 2 90 9 . 4 910.3 910.2 910.0 91 0 . 0 90 9 . 1 90 9 . 4 90 9 . 5 90 9 . 5 910.3 910.7 90 9 . 5 90 9 . 3 90 9 . 4 90 9 . 1 90 9 . 0 909.0 90 8 . 5 908.2 908.1 908.0 907.2 907.0 907.4 907.9 908.1 907.7 907.0 907.0 908.1 907.1 907.9 908.3 908.6 908.2 908.1 908.6 910.9 910.2 90 8 . 3 908.0 90 8 . 2 90 8 . 3 90 8 . 5 910.8 911.1 911.6 910.7 3212 908.9 SPRUCE 6 91 1 . 3 911.9 90 9 . 9 90 8 . 8 3217 908.8 OAK 6 3218 908.9 OAK 6 3219 909.2 ASH 10 90 8 . 9 90 9 . 0 911.0 91 0 . 2 CS910.2 909.94 EBIT TC 909.81 TC 910.1 SIGN 3231 909.5 PINE 6 3232 909.4 COTTONWOOD 16 3233 909.4 OAK 8 909.9 909.89 TC 908.8 90 8 . 1 908.6 908.6 910.6 909.2 906.3 909.46 TC CS 909.4 CS909.0 CS 909.3 907.2 907.1 907.2 3500 909.9 MAPLE30 909.3 909.5 909.9 910.4 909.5 909.4 910.0 3508 910.3 MAPLE22 910.0 908.9 3511 907.8 PINE16 907.2 907.1 907.1 907.1 907.0 907.2 3520 907.2 SPRUCE12 90 6 . 8 906.9 3523 907.5 SPRUCE16 3524 909.1 CRAB9 90 9 . 2 9 1 0 . 4 90 8 . 8 90 9 . 4 910 . 9 90 9 . 9 91 0 . 2 909.9 91 0 . 9 910.0 911.0 910. 2 910.7 910.4 910.0 909.9 910.4 910.6910.3 910.5 910.7 910.8910.8 91 0 . 7 910.9 910.8 910.9 91 0 . 5 910.1 909.7 910.4 910.6 910.9 9 1 0 . 9 916.8 FFE 3571 908.9 MAPLE18 3572 908.1 MAPLE18 908.3 907.0 EFIREPIT 907.2 EFIREPIT 3578 910.7 MAPLE34 909.8 909.4 909.3909 . 3 911.3910.2 909.25 TC 909.08 TC 909.05 TC 909.18 TC 909.18 TC 909.3 910.0 910.3 911.2 FFE-GAR 910.8 910.5 909.6 3610 910.2 CRAB10 911.9 911.2 911.0 910.8 910.9 911.9 912.3 DOOR-FFE+- 91 0 . 4 91 0 . 9 91 1 . 1 91 0 . 2 91 0 . 2 91 0 . 9 91 0 . 2 9 1 1 . 0 91 0 . 3 909.9910 . 6 91 0 . 1 90 9 . 9 90 9 . 6 90 9 . 2 909.1 909.4 91 0 . 4 91 1 . 3 910.8 91 0 . 4 90 9 . 7 91 0 . 1 91 1 . 6 911.0 910.0 909.3909.14 EBIT-TC 909.01 TC CO 909.54 SANSVC 909.46 MHSAN HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE GARAGEHOUSE EXISTING PERIMETER OF RANDOM DIRT PILES HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE 908.90 MHSAN SHED EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE PORTABLE SMOKE HOUSE EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y GR A V E L DR I V E W A Y 0.6 0.5 3.5 WEST FACE OF RETAINING WALL ON OR NEAR LOT LINE 6.0 9.1 908.97 FNDIP 3.2 FENCE 907.1 SB#4 907.9 SB#3 907.5 SB#2 909.2 SB#1 8.3 7.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE 909.2 909.3 EDGE OF LANDSCAPING 910.7 910.8 REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA. NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS. REMOVE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY REMOVE FENCE EXISTING SOIL STOCKPILE TO BE USED FOR ONSITE GRADING REMOVE PAVERS REMOVE TREE (TYP) GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBL DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W LEGEND DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES PAVER SURFACE S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.2 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . RE M O V A L S P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2164 (22" x 34") NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 R Call before you dig. below.Know what's HOUSE GARAGE 60 EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 909.3 912.2 EXISTING 909.1 909.2 909.1 909.0 MBOX5 CS 907.6 911.1 3212 908.9 SPRUCE 6 3217 908.8 OAK 6 3218 908.9 OAK 6 3219 909.2 ASH 10 CS910.2 910.1 SIGN 3231 909.5 PINE 6 3232 909.4 COTTONWOOD 16 3233 909.4 OAK 8 CS 909.4 CS909.0 CS 909.3 3500 909.9 MAPLE30 3508 910.3 MAPLE22 3511 907.8 PINE16 3520 907.2 SPRUCE12 3523 907.5 SPRUCE16 3524 909.1 CRAB9 3571 908.9 MAPLE18 3572 908.1 MAPLE18 3578 910.7 MAPLE34 3610 910.2 CRAB10 CO 909.54 SANSVC 909.46 MHSAN HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE GARAGEHOUSE EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE 908.90 MHSAN SHED EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE PORTABLE SMOKE HOUSE EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 0.6 0.5 3.5 WEST FACE OF RETAINING WALL ON OR NEAR LOT LINE 6.0 9.1 3.2 FENCE 8.3 7.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE 909.2 909.3 EDGE OF LANDSCAPING 910.7 910.8 REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA. NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS. NEW BOULEVARD TREE (SEE SPECIES LIST FOR SUITABLE TREES) NEW BOULEVARD TREE (SEE SPECIES LIST FOR SUITABLE TREES) EXISTING BOULEVARD TREE TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCING (TYP) EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL (GEN-27) - TYP. RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TEMPORARY SEED MIX - ONCE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, LOT TO BE PROVIDED WITH SOD GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBL DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W LEGEND DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES PAVER SURFACE S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C1.3 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . LA N D S C A P E P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2164 (22" x 34") NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 R Call before you dig. below.Know what's BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS. a. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. b. BOULEVARD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT THE RATE OF ONE TREE PER LOT FRONTAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY LOTS. TOWNHOME AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES SHALL PROVIDE BOULEVARD TREES AT A RATE OF ONE TREE PER 70 LINEAR FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE WHERE PROPERTY FRONTS ANY PUBLIC STREET. c. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 14 FEET OF THE CURB LINE OR AS OTHERWISE DETERMINED BY THE CITY FORESTER. d. EXISTING TREES MAY BE USED TO FULFILL BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS AT THE CITY'S DISCRETION. e. THE CITY MAY, AT ITS DISCRETION, PURCHASE AND INSTALL THE REQUIRED BOULEVARD TREES. IN SUCH CASE, THE CITY SHALL COLLECT A STANDARD FEE PER TREE. SAID FEE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND BASED ON THE ESTIMATED MARKET RATE COST TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL TREES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS SOD AND GROUND COVER a. SEED MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF SOD IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CASES: a.1. WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED TO FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS, OR a.2. WHERE THE SEED IS APPLIED ADJACENT TO NATURAL AREAS OR WETLANDS. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY, OR a.3. FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. SOD MAY BE REQUIRED IN AREAS SUBJECT TO EROSION AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR CITY ENGINEER. b. UNDISTURBED AREAS CONTAINING EXISTING VIABLE NATURAL VEGETATION WHICH CAN BE MAINTAINED FREE OF FOREIGN AND NOXIOUS PLANT MATERIALS. c. AREAS DESIGNATED AS OPEN SPACE OR FUTURE EXPANSION AREAS PROPERLY PLANTED AND MAINTAINED WITH NATIVE GRASSES OR WILD FLOWERS INDIGENOUS TO MINNESOTA. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. d. USE OF MULCH MATERIALS SUCH AS BARK, WOOD CHIPS, AND DECORATIVE ROCK IN SUPPORT OF SHRUBS AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS. e. NATIVE LANDSCAPES IN COMPLIANCE WITH M.S. § 412.925. Large Deciduous Trees: Common Name: Scientific Name: Oak Quercus (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties except Eastern p.worth) Maple Acer (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties) Hackberry (Thornless)Celtis occidentalis Birch Betula (all climatic Zone 3 varieties) Honeylocust (Thornless) Gleditsia tricanthos Linden/Basswood (American and Little Leaf) Tilia (americana) Ginkgo (male tree only) Ginkgo biloba Kentucky Coffee Tree Gymnocladus dioicus Delaware American Elm Ulmus americana “Delaware” Robusta Poplar Populus X robusta Niobe Weeping Willow Salix X blanda Hickory (Butternut) Carya cordiformis Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba Elm (Disease resistant) Ulmus (Disease resistant varieties) Medium Deciduous Trees: Amur Cork Phellodendron amurense Ohio Buckeye Aesculus glabra Small Deciduous Trees: Amur Chokecherry Prunus maackii Crabapple Malus spp. Hawthorn Crataegus Ironwood Ostrya virginiana American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Evergreen Trees: Fir Abies (all climatic Zone 3 varieties / Pseudotsuga) Spruce Picea (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties) Pine Pinus (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties) Canadian Hemlock Tsuga canadensis European Larch Larix decidua Cedar Cedrus (all climatic Zone 4b or less varieties) Eastern Larch Larix laricina THE TREE PROTECTION ZONES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY STAFF CONCURRENTLY WITH INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. DE S C R I P T I O N 10 . 1 5 . 2 4 HOUSE GARAGE 60 EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 909.3 912.2 EXISTING 909.1 909.2 909.1 909.0 MBOX5 CS 907.6 911.1 CS910.2 910.1 SIGN CS 909.4 CS909.0 CS 909.3 CO 909.54 SANSVC 909.46 MHSAN HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE GARAGEHOUSE EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE 908.90 MHSAN SHED EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE PORTABLE SMOKE HOUSE EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G DR I V E W A Y 0.6 0.5 3.5 WEST FACE OF RETAINING WALL ON OR NEAR LOT LINE 6.0 9.1 3.2 FENCE 8.3 7.3 TO FACE OF BRICK LEDGE 909.2 909.3 EDGE OF LANDSCAPING 910.7 910.8 REMNANTS OF OLD GRAVEL AREA. NOW OVERGROWN WITH GRASS. RAISE CURB STOP TO MATCH NEW GROUND ELEVATION RAISE CURB STOP TO MATCH NEW GROUND ELEVATION LOTS 2 AND 3 TO USE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES PROVIDED IN ARLO LANE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING HYDRANT EXIST SAN MH RE 908.90 IE 902.29 (NOT FIELD VER.) EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" PVC SAN. EXIST 8" WATERMAIN EXIST SAN MH RE 909.46 IE 902.35 (NOT FIELD VER.) EXIST 8" PVC SAN.EXIST 8" PVC SAN. EXIST 8" WATERMAIN EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATER SERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SEWER SERVICE (APPROX. LOC.) EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATER SERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SEWER SERVICE (~INV 904.0) EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATER SERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SEWER SERVICE (~INV 903.7) EXISTING 1" COPPER (TYPE K) WATER SERVICE AND 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SEWER SERVICE LOW FLOOR 909.40 LOW FLOOR 909.40 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE MAY NEED INSULATION AT TIME OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SANITARY SEWER SERVICE MAY NEED INSULATION AT TIME OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION LOW FLOOR ~908.8 GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. 2. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY AND STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY APPROVED WORKING HOURS. 6. PARKING, EQUIPMENT STORAGE OR MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL, SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS, AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC. DENOTES FENCE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE XX GAS E DENOTES UNDERGROUND CABLE LINECBL DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES SIGN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES CABLE PEDESTAL DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WELL DENOTES MAILBOX DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES SOIL BORING. (BY OTHERS) DENOTES AIR CONDITIONING UNIT DENOTES CLEAN OUT DENOTES CURB STOP DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE X 952.36 C E CO CS S T W LEGEND DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES PAVER SURFACE S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C2.1 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . UT I L I T Y P L A N PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2164 (22" x 34") NO R T H 1 INCH = 20 FEET HORIZONTAL 20 0 10 20 40 R Call before you dig. below.Know what's DE S C R I P T I O N 10 . 1 5 . 2 4 S:\PLOWE\CAD\24PROJ\2164 559 LOIS LANE (LINO LAKES)\2164 CAD\2164 BASE 2.DWG Tuesday, October 15, 2024 5:23:38 PM FA X : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 7 0 1 PH O N E : ( 6 5 1 ) 3 6 1 - 8 2 1 0 LI N O L A K E S , M N 5 5 0 1 4 67 7 6 L A K E D R I V E SU I T E 1 1 0 SI T E P L A N N I N G & E N G I N E E R I N G PL O W E EN G I N E E R I N G , I N C . PR E P A R E D F O R : M E S P A R G U R I N C . SP A R G U R E S T A T E S LI N O L A K E S , M N 1 2 4 5 6 7 83 MQ A AG CH E C K B Y : DR A W N B Y : 24 - 2 1 6 4 DA T E : JO B N O : 09 / 0 6 / 2 4 DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E NO . SHEET C3.1 Da t e : L i c e n s e N o . 4 3 9 6 3 AD A M G I N K E L 10 . 1 5 . 2 0 2 4 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y li c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f th e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . DE T A I L S PR E L I M I N A R Y 24-2164 2' ( M I N . ) WHITE FLAGGING (TYP) PLAN DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. NOTES: 1. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO KEEP TREE STRAIGHT AND PLUM. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" WHITE PVC TRUNK GUARD AT TIME OF PLANTING MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: 1. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP-HALF OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. 2. REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. 3. EXPOSE ROOT FLARE SO THAT IT IS VISIBLY AT GRADE TO ENSURE TREES ARE INSTALLED AT PROPER DEPTH, AND THAT MULCH IS PULLED BACK 3 INCHES FROM THE TRUCK (I.E. MULCH IS NOT TOUCHING THE TRUNK.) 4. IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET OFF AND REMOVE. DISPOSE OFF OFF-SITE 5. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE ON 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOW DRAINING SOILS. 6. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASS TREE STAKES, 11/16" X 6'-0" 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. ENSURE NEW PLANT HOLES PASS THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. DOUBLE STAKE WITH POLYPROPYLENE WEBBING THROUGH THE EYE OF THE CINCH-TIE RUBBER SUPPORT. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT BALL WITH SUPPORT STAKES DE S C R I P T I O N 10 . 1 5 . 2 4 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: November 6, 2024 Re: Spargur Estates Preliminary Plat & Civil Plan Review 026728-000 As requested by City staff, WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans for Spargur Estates Addition in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Plowe Engineering and received October 15, 2024. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Spargur Estates – Civil Plans prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated October 15, 2024. •Spargur Estates – Site Drainage Narrative and Calculations prepared by PloweEngineering, revised October 15, 2024. •Spargur Estates – Certificate of Survey prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated October 15,2024. •Spargur Estates – Preliminary Plat prepared by EG Rud & Sons, dated October 15, 2024. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. Plowe (10/15//2024) Responses in red. WSB (11/6/2024) responses and new comments in blue. Engineering •Grading The Spargur Estates Addition grading consists of grading the original single-family lot to create three (3) single-family lots and a narrow infiltration basin. The infiltration basin treats the rear and some front drainage from the four lots while the remaining drainage flows to Arlo Lane to the north or Lois Lane to the south. Comments: 1.Maintain 2% positive slope through Arlo Lane boulevard/right of way (Plowe 10/15//24) The grading plan has been revised to show a positive slope (2%) to the curb line through the Arlo Ln R/W and most of the lot frontages (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.There is an existing low area at the northeast rear corner of Lot 1 near thefire pit Attachment 3: City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024 Ms. Katie Larsen 11/6/2024 Page 2 Spargur Estates Engineering Review •Consider filling low area to reduce standing water in a rain event (Plowe 10/15//24) It appears that with some revised grading, there is apositive slope to the east.(WSB 11/6/24) Complete 3. Provide information or a detail for any special construction or soil information for 2’ drainage ditches (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is to be removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend. (WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment •Ditches will need to demonstrate permeable material (Plowe 10/15//24) A boring in the ditch location shows SP-SM soils whichare generally silty sands. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Recommend digging down to permeable soils and installing sand/compost mix to final grade to better promote infiltration and reduce standing water in a rain event (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the topsoil is to be removed and replaced with a sand/topsoil blend. (WSB 11/6/24) Provide detail showing the extents of the soils amendment 4.Provide ditch High Water Level (HWL) on plans (Plowe 10/15//24) The basin’s HWL has been noted on the plans. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 5.Relocate existing shed outside of 5' easement/setback (Plowe 10/15//24) It is noted that the shed (a portable smokehouse) will be moved outside of the drainage and utility easement and 5-ft setback. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 6.Relocate existing fire pit outside of 20' distance from property line and 25' distance from structures (Plowe 10/15//24) A note has been added indicating that the fire pit should be moved to meet the above required distances. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 7.The current 906.8 'berm' near the southeast corner of Lot 4 would spill over the 906.5 spot elevation on the eastern property line •Raise berm and initial EOF to east to 907.2 (Basin to the east is 'land- locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west) (Plowe 10/15//24) Berm has been raised as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •EOF for basin to the east is towards this development and would be at 907.2 Ms. Katie Larsen 11/6/2024 Page 3 Spargur Estates Engineering Review (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •The highpoint on the east side at the front of Lot 4 would become the secondary EOF for the existing basin to the east when inundated. (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted (WSB 11/6/24) Previous 908.7 EOF acted as a secondary EOF for the adjacent developments to the east and west and must be maintained (Basin to the east is 'land-locked' and will ultimately flow back to the west). 1 Areas along the side property line can be filled to improve drainage swales but the 908.7 EOF must be maintained 2 Adjacent grading should be contained to drainage and utility easements 3 Grading on adjacent property must be coordinated and approved by the adjacent property owner 4 Provide written documentation to the City prior to construction •(WSB 11/6/24) The Lowest Opening Elevation (LOE) of Lots 2 and 3 mustbe at least 910.7 to maintain minimum freeboard with the EOF (908.7) 1 The Lowest Floor elevation must be a minimum 909.4 (SELO) •Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the site consists of a small read yard depression. However, based on site layout, stormwater management is not required under City ordinance. Comments on the proposed stormwater design are offered below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 0.62 1.70 4.17 Not required Proposed 1.27 2.80 6.43 Not required Comments: 1.There are minor increases in site runoff rates due to the new impervious. However, as stormwater management requirements are not triggered, these increases are not regulated. Runoff to the north and south will be captured by storm sewer routing to City ponds. (Plowe 10/15//24) Noted. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.Sufficient freeboard is available between the depression modeled HWL and the proposed household low floors/low entries. Ms. Katie Larsen 11/6/2024 Page 4 Spargur Estates Engineering Review (Plowe 10/15//24) Per client request, the units shown are now split-entry walkouts; these low floors had to be raised to meet the 2-ft freeboard requirement. (WSB 11/6/24) The revised lowest openings for Lots 2 and 3 no longer meet minimum freeboard requirements with the adjacent EOFs (909.5+). It is necessary to maintain 3.Silt fence or bioroll is recommended around the rear yard depression tomaintain infiltration capacity and reduce likelihood of excess ponding in thefuture.(Plowe 10/15//24) Biorolls have been added as suggested.(WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Water Supply The proposed water will be supplied by three existing 1-inch Type K copper services extended to the lots. Comments: 1.Show the existing well for Lot 1 if present •Abandon/seal the existing well for Lot 1 per MDH requirements with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) The existing well was sealed multiple years ago. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Note the existing well may be left in place for non-potable irrigation useif MDH setbacks can be met from the proposed utility services (Plowe 10/15//24) N/A (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewer and water service stubs with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate locations have been shown. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Water service stub is 1" copper (Type K) •Show existing water service from main to house if present 3.Show existing water stubs to all lots as 1" copper (Type K)(Plowe 10/15//24) Water services have been labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer will be supplied by existing 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC gravity service pipes extended to the lots from Arlo Lane (Lots 2 and 3). The existing lot (Lot 1) has been previously connected to a service in Lois Lane. Ms. Katie Larsen 11/6/2024 Page 5 Spargur Estates Engineering Review Comments: 1.Show septic system for existing house (Lot 1) if present •Remove existing septic system per Anoka County requirements with construction (Plowe 10/15//24) The septic system was removed multiple years ago. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 2.Show connecting the existing house (Lot 1) to the provided sanitary sewerand water service stubs with construction •Sanitary sewer service stub is 4" PVC SCH 40 (Plowe 10/15//24) Labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Show existing sanitary sewer service from main to house if present (Plowe 10/15//24) Approximate location has been shown. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 3.Show existing sanitary sewer stubs to all lots as 4” PVC Schedule 40(Plowe 10/15//24) Sewer services have been labeled as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 4.Provide low floor information for all lots on utility plan (Plowe 10/15//24) Low floor information has been added to the plan. Note that the existing house low floor was estimated based on known first floor elevation. A Darcy’s Law calculation has been added to the drainage narrative to demonstrate that the low floor is protected. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete 5.Add note that the sanitary sewer service may require insulation at the time ofbuilding construction and connection(Plowe 10/15//24) Note added as requested. (WSB 11/6/24) Complete •Transportation There is minimal impact to traffic or roads as this development simply splits the existing single-family lot into four smaller single family lots which will not generate significantly more traffic. •Trails and sidewalks There are no existing trails or sidewalks adjacent to the proposed development with none being proposed •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan There are no wetlands identified on the site Ms. Katie Larsen 11/6/2024 Page 6 Spargur Estates Engineering Review •Landscaping The Spargus Estates Landscape Plan has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. •Floodplain The Spargus Estates subdivision does not impact floodplain. •Drainage and Utility Easements The current drainage and utility easements are being maintained from the original single-family lot (10’ front; 5’ sides). Additional easements need to be added around the perimeter of the smaller lots (10’ front and back; 5’ sides). •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement No grading agreement is required for this site. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement No stormwater maintenance agreement is required for this site. •Permits Required 1.Rice Creek Watershed District Erosion Control Permit 2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: November 1, 2024 Re: Environmental Comments – Spargur Estates Environmental Board had recommended the following at their September 25, 2024 meeting: 1.Tree Protection Zones (TPZs) for the 17 trees scheduled for preservation must be shown to scale on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.1), and the Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). The TPZs must be in place prior to issuance of grading permit and will be reviewed by staff concurrently with inspection of sediment and erosion control measures. 2.Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (C1.1) should be updated to identify location of rock construction entrance(s) and silt fence around perimeter of site unless otherwise directed by City Engineer. a.Rock construction entrance not shown for lot 3. Update sheet C1.1 to identify rock construction entrance. b.Add a note to phase 1 on C1.1 to include street sweeping of adjacent impervious as directed by the city engineer. c.Provide inlet protect on the 2 catch basin on Arlo Ln adjacent to the project location. d.Plan currently shows silt fence extending through lot three and onto neighboring property. Confirm appropriate permissions have been granted to install the fence on this property or remove the silt fence past the property line. 3.Replace note on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan about installing “Tree Protection as Applicable” with “Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail”. Environmental Memo Attachment 4: Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024 Page 2 4.The Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3) should include a note regarding protecting trees in accordance with City Tree Protection Fence Detail. City Tree Protection detail should be added to Sheet C1.3. 5.Ground cover type locations must be added to the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (C1.1) and Landscape Plan (Sheet C1.3). This includes cover type for all exposed soil areas (ex: sod for the lots,). a.Call seed mix type and stabilization method for temporary stabilization as called out in the plans. Plans state temporary stabilization to be completed. b.On sheet C1.3 provide crossing hatching or shading to show which areas are receiving each type of seed mix or sod. i.Remove seed mixes from legend that are not being proposed. c.Provide seeding information for the proposed infiltration basin. 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-156 RESOLUTION APPROVING SPARGUR ESTATES VARIANCES WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for variances for Spargur Estates also referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the proposed Development based on the following submittals: •Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 •Drainage Report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 •Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company dated August 23, 2024 •Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated October 2, 2024; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the lots will be Lots 1-3, Block 1, Spargur Estates upon filing of the final plat; and WHEREAS, the lots are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 1007.110(2)(c) requires a minimum lot depth 135 feet; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a three (3) foot variance from the lot depth requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the variances on November 13, 2024. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: FINDINGS OF FACT Per City Code Section 1007.018(3): (a)Criteria and findings of fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in divisions 1. through 6. below, or unless division 7. below applies. The city shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. Attachment 5: Resolution No. 24-156 2 1.The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. The general purpose and intent of the R-1, Single Family Residential District is to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. The district is intended for development of single family detached homes on lots served with public sanitary sewer and water. The three (3) lot residential subdivision proposed for Spargur Estates meets the general purpose and intent of providing single family housing. All three (3) lots will be served by public water and sanitary sewer. The Development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood. 2.The variance shall be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The variance is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. 3.There shall be practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The subdivision of an existing parcel and creation of three (3) residential lots are reasonable uses of the property. The practical difficulty in complying with the lot depth requirements of the zoning ordinance would only allow for the creation of two (2) lots. This would not be consistent with the intent of the Mar Don Acres plat or the previously approved Hailey Manor and Isabell Estates subdivisions. 4.The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is created by the requirement to dedicate 30 feet of road right-of- way on Arlo Lane which reduces the lot depths to 132 feet. The need for the variances was not created by the landowner. 5.The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposal to create three (3) single family residential lots for the purpose of constructing two (2) new single family detached dwellings is compatible with the surrounding existing single family detached dwellings. Similar variances were approved for the two adjacent subdivisions, Hailey Manor and Golden Acre. 3 6.A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Single family detached dwellings are permitted uses in the R-1, Single Family Residential District. 7.In accordance with M.S. § 462.357, Subd. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following Spargur Estates variances are approved: •Lots 1-3, Block 1, Spargur Estates o A three (3) foot variance to reduce the required lot depths from 135 feet to 132 feet. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-157 RESOLUTION APPROVING SPARGUR ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Spargur Estates preliminary plat also referred to as Development; and WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the Development based on the following submittals: •Plan Set prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 •Drainage Report prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. revision date October 15, 2024 •Title Commitment prepared by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company dated August 23, 2024 •Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated October 2, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on October 9, 2024 and November 13, 2024 and the Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: FINDINGS OF FACT Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1)General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2)Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a)Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1.Land use plan; 2.Transportation plan; 3.Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4.Local water management plan; 5.Capital improvement plan; and 6.Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Attachment 6: Resolution No. 24-157 2 Spargur Estates is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive regarding resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The Development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Spargur Estates is consistent with infill policies. The Development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025. No new utility or street extensions are required. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 3 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Spargur Estates meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Arlo Lane is a minor collector road and has structural capacity to handle two (2) additional single family detached dwellings. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Spargur Estates will have an adequate water supply. The subject site is served by an 8” DIP watermain along Lois Land and Arlo Lane. The water supply system has capacity to handle two (2) new single family detached dwellings. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Spargur Estates will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. The subject site is in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub-district 2B) and is served by MCES Interceptor 83-61, a 24 inch 4 gravity sewer located in North Road. The subject site is also in the current 1A (2018-2025) Utility Staging Area. An 8” PVC sanitary sewer main exists along both Lois Lane and Arlo Lane. The sanitary system has capacity to handle two (2) new single family detached dwellings. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Spargur Estates preliminary plat is not a premature subdivision; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Spargur Estates preliminary plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Comments from City Engineer Memo dated November 6, 2024 shall be addressed. 2. Comments from Environmental Memo dated November 1, 2024 shall be addressed. 3. Sheet S2, Preliminary Plat: a. The gross and net density information under Area is incorrect and shall be revised. The public right of way is not subtracted when calculating density. Please see the staff report for the correct information. 4. Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan: a. The area east of the existing driveway off Lois Lane labeled “Remnants of Old Gravel Area Now Overgrown with Grass” shall be shown as being removed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following items shall be addressed prior to November 30, 2025 or at time of building permit issuance: 1. As shown on Sheet C1.2, Removals Plan: a. The existing fence and pavers shall be removed. b. The old gravel area now overgrown with grass adjacent to the existing driveway off Lois Lane, the random dirt piles, and the gravel driveway off Arlo Lane shall be restored with proper ground cover in compliance with City Code Section 1007.049(8). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE City Engineer MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution 24-160, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ___________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting Council approval to order the project and authorize the ad for bid for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. BACKGROUND On October 14, 2024, the City Council approved the preparation of the plans and specifications for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. The 2025 Street Rehabilitation improvements are part of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan which is based off the City’s Pavement Management Program. The Pavement Management Program evaluates the condition of the roadways and provides recommendations for maintenance for the City’s entire network of roadways. The proposed 2025 Street Rehabilitation Improvements Project includes the following: Mill and Overlay (approximately 1.25 miles) • Coyote Trl and Ct • Fawn Ln (south of Birch), Beaver Trl, and Muskrat Run • E. Shadow Lake Ct, White Birch Ct, and Red Birch Ct Bid Alternate 1. Linden Ln (0.3 miles) 2. Red Hawk Trl (0.1 miles) 3. Thin Overlay of Orange St, Eva St, Olive St, and Maple St (0.82 miles) The bid alternate is advancing part of the 2026 Street Rehabilitation project. If funding allows, the City Council may consider awarding these areas in with the 2025 project. Throughout the project area, gate valves will be replaced if they have not been previously repaired. The estimated total project cost is $1,200,000.00. Funding for the project is expected to be from the Pavement Management Fund, Storm Water Utility fund, and Water Operating Fund. The project schedule: Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications October 14, 2024 Order Improvement, Approve Plans and Specs, Authorize Ad for Bids December 9, 2024 City Opens Bids February 4, 2025 City Council Awards Contract February 10, 2025 Construction Begins April-May, 2025 Final Completion August 30, 2025 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-160, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-160 2. Construction Plans CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-160 ORDER PROJECT, APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR 2025 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. Project plans and specifications have been presented to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes: 1.Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2.The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance and Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be publicly opened at the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on February 10th, 2025, in the Council chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December 2024. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 14 14 35E 14 Amelia AN O K A CO U N T Y CO U N T Y RICE CREEK - CHAIN OF LAKES RESERVE REGIONAL PARK T31N R22W R21W13182419 35W 18171920 35W 35W 14 14 140 140 T31N R22W 4 3109 T31N R22W 8 9 1716 T31N T31N R23W R22W127 13 8 T31N R22W 6 5 7 8 35E MAI N ST. N. MAIN ST. GO I F F O N RD. DR. RD . TO U R V I L L E CIR . HERIT AGE ST. MAI N ST. DR. CIR . MALLARD L A . BIRCH ST. JO Y E R LA . KARTH RD.TAL L E L A . HILL S DR. ST. TR. RD. CIR. F ST. PHE A S A N T RUN BLA C K DUC K HOLLY CT. TAMARACK LA. DR . KILL D E E R LA. RUN S. BLA C K D U C K DR . S. CIR . 64th ST. CRYSTA L C T . RID G E WH I T E T A I L RD. RD. CT. VELVETLEAF LA. LAK E DEER PASSCIR. LA. PEL T I E R HILLS C I R . PHEA S A N T TR. GO O S E SN O W CIR . HAW K RUF F E D EGIDRTRPAPL. BLA C K DUC K LANTERN LA. LANTERN DR.LLS OLDBIR C H ST. NE AS P CT. CHOKECHERRY WHITE OAK AIL WH I T E T OLD MILL RD. RAELC 20t h AVE . S. 20t h AVE . TETLAMO ETTO SUM A C C T . ING LLRO REILING PRO GRE SS OAK LA.KNOL L DR. OLE DR. CAR VICKY LA. 80th ST. ELM C R E S T AV E . N. 81st ST. E. . TR. GOR D O N A V E . H ST. EVERGREEN 81st ST. W. DR. DR. ST. LAKE THOMAS ST. ANDALL ANDALL ST. ST. WOO D D U C K TR. LA. BLA C K B I R D BLU E B I L L L A . 77th ST. ST.MAIN 4th AVE . N. W. ST. LEO N A R D AVE . ST.JON AV E . GLEN VIEW DR. LA K E V I E W DR . SU N R I S E AVE . RIC E AQUA LA. LA.LAKE DR. NORTH RD. ELM ST. DR . LA. MARCIA LA. BIRCH ST. R I C E L A K E C T . RIC E L A K E D R . BRAD AV E . TR . 74th PAT T I DR. ULMER DR. GRE Y AN T E L O P E DR . GLAD STONE DR. CONNIE WHI P P O O R W I L L LA. GRAY JEA N N E GLE N V I E W L A . RUSTIC AVE. DR. WILDFLOWERDR. HO K A H RIC E CT. TR. TOT E M CT. TO MA HCIPPE OW H E A D ARR CT. LONE RED H A W K TR. PAI N T E D TUR T L E VE RCH PL. DR. KIN G F I S H E R CT. FAWN TR. HAWTHORN RD. R BI IR LA . COUNTRY LAKES DR. FAIR DR. SUNFLOWERLA. SQU I R R E L RD. SU NF ISH C T . LAK E LA. SNO W OW L LA. CIR . CAR I B O U MEA D O W CT . TER R A CT.CT. DR. MARVY MAIN RON D E A U 77th ST. E. 21st AVE. N. ELM C R E S T AVE . 14 HEA T H E R CT. KILLDEER WA TR. BEAVER WHITE OWLDR. LAKE TR.PINE SOME LINDENLA. R.T TEO CO Y 1. PRAIRIE FLOWER RD. MAPLE LA. HU G O HU G O CI R C L E P I N E S BL A I N E CENTERVILLE CIR.B SHA D OW RED DR.LA. LA. IARGREENBR CLOVER 4A 8 LEA T31NR22W MONT 1.2. SU N S E T AV E . LEY ST. 1318 127R22W T31N R21W SU N S E T AVE . RID G E EAS T LAK E CT. MOU R N I N G DOV E RD . SMOKETREE 4. WILLOW PONDS TR. 4.4. IVY RID G E SNOW OW L CIR. HER O N DR. RIDGE IVYCT. 5. COYOTE TR. CT.COY O T E DR. HOLLY DR. 5. CINNAMON TEAL CT. 23 49 49 23 GE 12 t h A V E . S . BUCKTHORN RID MUS T A N G N. CT. APP CAS S I O P E I A CT. TRAPPERS S. CRO SSING TR ERSTRAPP DURANGOPT. CH EROK E E T R . HUDSON TR. ERS PEREGRINE CIR. LA 6. CLEARWATER CREEK CIR. 2. IRONWOOD CIR. 3. HICKORY PL. MUSTANG PONY LA. PALOMINO LA. HUNTERS TR. CT. DEE R EA GLE FAIRVIEW ST. WESTVIEWST. PELTIER RD . CE N TE R V ILLE LAND LAKECIR. LAKE ST. REVOIR 21 CREEK PASS CREE K CRIP P L E CT.CRIP P L E MERGANSERCT. OAK CT. BROKEN SHER CIR. MAN KERD. TEAL CT. CT. MEA D O W LARK SHERMAN RD. PONDVIEWCIR. T31N R22W R21W2530 36 31 DR. ARTHUR CT. CT. CRE E K CREEK DR . CIR . TELEDR. La CASS E ELLE N CT.TEL E La IVERSON CT.CA I N E CT.ATER TART RD. FLORA LAN G E R CIR. CT. LA.TA R T C T . LAKE CL EAR W DELINA CIR. CASSE CT. 65th ST.LA. LANGER GREENWOOD PRAIRIE VIEW PL. BARBARA LA. LA. LA. NOT T I N G H A M L A . MEA D O W V I E W T R . CO U NTRY 79th ST. LA. OAK OAK LA. CT. MAR I L Y N DR. ARLO WOODDUCK TR. LA. HEN RY LA. CT. MY R TLE JO SEP H APOLLO DR. AP MARSH A N LA. HOLLOW GROUSE C ROSSING RO Y A L P I N E S PL. LETSAU GHART LANGER LA.LA US T CIR . FO R D CIR. CIR. ST ELLA LO CEDAR ST.CEDAR ST.CLEAR WATER PARK W A Y RD. MOUND TRAIL CT . MO U N D PELTIER CI R . CLE A R W A T E R DR. GATEWAY CIR. LA . CENTER ST. IVY C T . ST. CENTER ST. A PH E SAN T MEADOWLA. MEADOW MEA D O W CIR. CT. MAL L A R D WA Y YAW OJIB DR. OA K CIR . AVOY CT. GEIDTR AR P SHORT PO R T AGEWAY G ER DUPRE RD.PIONEER LA. NORTHERN LIGHTSBLVD. OTTER RD . PIN T O LA. PINTO LA. HOL L O W LA. GLEN TR. SH A DOW WHI T E OW L DR. W. MUSKRAT RUN CIR.RWOODEDE LA . FOX BEAVERCIR DEE R WOOD WOODERDE LA. T31N R22W 27 263435 DR.HOLLY SH ER MAN GOLD E N ROD CIR. HILL S DR. CT.OAKVIEW VIE WCT . WODAEM DR. STO N E Y B R O O K SEDGE CT. PHELPS RD. 4th A V E . PARK GLEN GLAD STONE VIEW VIEW 2nd A V E . PHEASANT TIMBERWOLF CIR. RWOLF TR. HI TI MB E OSP R E Y CT. KELATR. TIM B E R W O L F WOLF CIR. HUNTERS SHADOW WHITE BIRCH CT.RED BIR C H CT.CT. GROUSE RD. TR . EYK TU R WIL D EA PH SA NTGAA G E L A . CANFIELD RD. LAKE DR. CT. SHADOW CIR. WARERD. SIOUX SIOUX CT. KOOLLA. WARE OUT SIO U X RD. DR.RD. ARROWHEAD OJI B W A Y PA T HTR.KOTA LA LINDA LINDA CIR. HO D G S O N DR.HI L LHERO N BLU E DR.R. EGRET LA. PELICA N PL. CHERRY LA. PLUM L WI CourtTrailer NDA SA N D LA. STALLION CEN TURY ARA B I A N CIR . LA. CARL ST. LA. SHERLO I S WOOD WI OWC R. LL I CIR. CIR. AQU A AQU A DR. LOIS LA. LA. HIGHLAND DR.CT. HIGHLANDHIGHLAND TR.LA. FOXFOXCOVEHOLLOWRED FOX RD . RD.FOX FOX RD. DR. NAN C Y T31NR22W2728 33 34 VAUGH A N CT. RD . BEA V E R WIDGEON CIR. HUNTERS RID G E LA . POND WAY DUPRE RD. CE N T E R V I L L E CT.SHERMANLAKERD. DR.MOLITOR BLOOM CT. WA S H I N G T O N PINE ROBINSON DR.RO B I N S O N AV E . CLY D E S D A L E CIR . 21s t AVE . REHBEIN ST. RON D E A U LAK E RD . W. RONDEAU LAKE RD. W. PA R T R I D G E 34 3434 54 54 54 84 84 84 DR . CIR. RD. FOX RUN PRAIRIE DR. TR. MIL L R D . VIE W LA. BRI A N WAY LA. 73rd ST. 72 72nd ST. QUEBECST. ST EVEN TW I N LA K E S R D . ROBINN.HAYFIELD PETE R SO N LEUOH UN I T Y AVE. S. ROBINLA.RO B I N LA . W. DINALCAR DR. DEE R P A S S D R . RID G E SHA D A V E . TR.CT. BRI A N CO T T O N W O O D CT. CO T T O N W O O D CT.BR I A N ST. LAKE LAKE RD. PAR K W A Y RD. POST RD. LAKE DR. FORSHAM CT. SHAN CT. PARK MAR TR PKW WOO D S ED G E CEN DR. Y. E TECKLACT. LA . LA.LA. LILAC APPALOO SA PALOMINO APPALOOSA CT. QU A R T E R HOR S E CT. LA. BE H M OM I N O CT. PAL CT. MORGAN LA. SHET LAND LA. LOIS LA. KELLY THY CT. WA Y N E CIR . JA N E AVE . SHE I L A AV E . TIM O ST. 54 34 DR. 49 49 PL. 154 154 MINNESOTA CORRECTIONALFACILITY- LINO LAKES STA G E COACH TR . 12 ST. APOLLO DR. OL SAVANNA CT. SOREL GR A N G E - 6. W.E. R. T VILLAGE DR.TOWN MAPLE ST. NOR D I N S T . OLIVE ST. ORANGE ST. DIA N E ST. ST. WOODLAND D R . G ST.77th ST. ST. DAN U B E ST.ST . ELB E ST.81st LAK E JAMES E 53 14 23 CIR. 53 23 HAW K 53 53 RUFFED G R O U S E LA . La C A S S E DR. AENON PL. 23 LA. CT.BIR CH MINERAL POINT RD. AN T PH E A S TR. LAK E 53 CIR. 12 12 23 T31N R22W 1211 2 1 21 Baldwin Lake Rice Lake Marshan Lake Reshanau Lake GeorgeWatch Lake LA AVLLE DR. MAL Centerville Lake Wards Lake ShermanLake Clearwater Creek Lake Peltier Peltier Lake Hardwood Creek Creek Rice Rondeau Lake SANDPIPER EAST SHA D O W LAKE DR. WEST APPLE 2526 23 24 T31N R22W EV A ST. LI N O L A K E S City Hall C: \ A C C \ A C C D o c s \ W S B \ 0 2 6 8 9 1 - 0 0 0 \ P r o j e c t F i l e s \ 0 5 _ D i s c i p l i n e \ R o a d w a y \ 0 3 _ S h e e t s \ 0 2 3 8 9 1 - 0 0 0 - C - T T B L - 0 0 0 1 . d w g 12 / 4 / 2 0 2 4 1 2 : 2 1 : 5 0 P M 2025 REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN MILL & OVERLAY AND GATE VALVE REPLACEMENTCONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR LOCATED ON RED BIRCH COURT MUSKRAT RUN COYOTE TRAIL PROJECT LOCATION MAPCOUNTY:ANOKA SECT X, TWP XXX, RNG XX PROJECT LOCATION THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." GOPHER ONE CALL TICKET NUMBER: 243052200, 243060719, 243052148, 243052330, 243052231, 243052166, 243051818, 243052113, 243052404, 243052276, 2430523386 UTILITY COORDINATION MEETING HELD ON: XXXXXXXXXXXX APPROVED BYSHEET NO.DATE PLAN REVISIONS ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES WILL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 21 SHEETS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LICENSE NUMBER:DATE:12/13/2023 43338 DIANE L. HANKEE, PE, P.E. SHEET 39 OFWSB PROJ. NO. 026891-000 WHITE BIRCH COURT FAWN LANE COYOTE COURT ---- THIS PLAN SET HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR: CITY OF LINO LAKES 600 TOWN CENTER PARKWAY LINO LAKES, MN 55014 (651) 982-2400 A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (651-454-0002) IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS UTILITY INFORMATION N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 2500 5000 HORIZONTAL DATUM: VERTICAL DATUM: PLAN SET INDEX THIS WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2023 EDITION OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES "GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION." THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE LATEST FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. EAST SHADOW LAKE CTBEAVER TRAIL LINDEN LANE RED HAWK TRAIL MAPLE STREET ORANGE STREET OLIVE STREET EAST LAKE SHADOW COURT WHITE BIRCH COURT RED BIRCH COURT FAWN LANE BEAVER TRAIL MUSKRAT RUNCOYOTE TRAIL COYOTE COURT LINDEN LANE ("BID ALTERNATE") RED HAWK TRAIL ("BID ALTERNATE") OLIVE STREET ("BID ALTERNATE") ORANGE STREET ("BID ALTERNATE") MAPLE STREET ("BID ALTERNATE") CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, PE City Engineer MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution 24-161, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid, 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ___________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting Council approval order the project, and authorize the ad for bid for the 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project. BACKGROUND On September 23, 2024, the City Council approved the preparation of the plans and specifications for the 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project. The 2025 Street Reconstruction Project includes the Colonial Woods neighborhood including 62nd Street and Red Maple Lane as well as the Pine Haven neighborhood including 81st Street, Elbe Street, and Danube Street. Diane Street and Evergreen Trail are also included as overlay projects. The next step in the process is to complete the final design and bidding of the project. Once the project is bid the Council will consider award of a contract. The Council may wish to consider holding the Assessment Hearing prior to contract award. The estimated schedule for the project: Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications September 23, 2024 Order Improvement, Approve Plans and Specs, Authorize Ad for Bids December 9, 2024 City Opens Bids February 4, 2025 Assessment Hearing *Tentative Date February 10, 2025 City Council Awards Contract March 24, 2025 Construction Begins April-May, 2025 Substantial Completion November 30, 2025 The estimated project costs including contingencies and overhead are as follows: Colonial Woods $4,024,209.00 Pine Haven $3,336,193.00 Diane Street and Evergreen Trail $327,000.00 Total $7,687,402.00 Funding for the project will be from property tax levy, the City’s Area & Unit Trunk Fund, Storm Water Utility fund, and special assessments. The project will be financed by the issuance of Street Reconstruction and Utility Revenue Bonds. Special assessments to the benefitting properties are for a portion of the sewer and water extension cost as presented in the Colonial Woods and Pine Haven Feasibility Studies. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-161, Order Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bid for the 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-161 2. Construction Plans CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-161 ORDER PROJECT, APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR 2025 STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND SEWER AND WATER EXTENSION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2025 Street Reconstruction and Sewer and Water Extension Project. Project plans and specifications have been presented to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance and Commerce an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be publicly opened at the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on March 24th, 2025, in the Council chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December 2024. _______________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-164, Approving MOU with VLAWMO, Wilkinson Lake Stormwater BMP Feasibility Study VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Vadnais Lakes Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) and North Oaks Company (NOC) for the preparation of a feasibility study for stormwater treatment for Wilkinson Lake. BACKGROUND Wilkinson Lake is a natural environment lake located in the southeast portion of Lino Lakes. The watershed area is approximately 1,000 acres. Approximately 300 acres of the watershed are located within the City of Lino Lakes. Wilkinson lake is within resource management unit 4 in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Wilkinson Lake is listed as an impaired waterbody by the MPCA. The lake is listed as impaired for nutrients (phosphorus) limiting the use of aquatic recreation. As part of the TMDL each MS- 4 is given a load allocation to reduce nutrient loading to the waterbody. Lino Lakes has a TMDL reduction of 1.2 lbs/yr to meet the requirements. Most of the land within the Lino lakes portion of the sub watershed is currently agricultural and low density residential. The lack of development and infrastructure within the City boundary limits the City’s ability and opportunities to reduce pollutants. As agricultural land redevelops it will be required to meet the City’s MS-4 requirements which will limit sediment and nutrient runoff. Because of the limited opportunities within the watershed to implement stormwater BMP’s the City is looking to partner with VLAWMO and NOC to complete a feasibility study in this location. With adjacent future development this presents an opportunity to work with stakeholders (VLAWMO and NOC) to provide additional stormwater treatment. 2 The partnership with VLAWMO and NOC will include a cost match for professional services required to complete the feasibility study, with the City, VLAWMO, and NOC contributing to the total not to exceed cost of $38,780. The City portion will be split amongst the tasks within the proposal that relate directly to stormwater BMP’s and nutrient reduction. The total cost of the City portion is $11,061. City staff will also be working with the consultant developing the study. The City’s Environmental Board recommended approval of the proposal at their November 26, 2024 meeting. VLWAMO will be bringing the MOU to their board meeting on December 11, 2024 for approval. Funding for the City’s share of the project will come from the Surface Water Management Fund. This fund was established in 1992 to cover the costs of surface water planning and trunk facility improvements. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-164. ATTACHMENTS 1. Study area map 2. Resolution No. 24-164 3. VLAWMO MOU 4. ISG Scope of Work CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-164 RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND WITH VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION AND NORTH OAKS COMPANY FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE WILKINSON LAKE FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, Wilkinson Lake has been identified by the MPCA to be impaired for excess nutrient loading; and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is proposing to partner with the land owner adjacent to Wilkinson Lake and Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO) to complete a feasibility study of stormwater best management practices (BMP’) for nutrient reduction; and WHEREAS, the VLAWMO has funding available to assist with the study; and WHEREAS, the North Oaks Company (NOC), property owner, has funding and land available to assist with the study and future BMP construction; and WHEREAS, ISG, inc has submitted a proposal to complete the study for a not to exceed amount of $38, 780.00; and WHEREAS, the City proposed share of the project cost is $11,061; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that hereby approves the MOU with the VLAWMO and NOC and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk Nov. 26, 2024 DRAFT #2- Memorandum of Understanding- ISG Feasibility Study Memorandum of Understanding Between North Oaks Company (NOC), Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization (VLAWMO) and City of Lino Lakes (City) This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is made and entered into by and between the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization ("VLAWMO") and City of Lino Lakes ("City") and North Oaks Company (NOC) each acting by and through its duly authorized governing bodies. Whereas, NOC, VLAWMO and the City mutually desire to partner on a feasibility study ("Study") to assess and evaluate three key components related to the potential water quality treatment practice within the Wilkinson Lake Subwatershed in the City of Lino Lakes and the VLAWMO watershed; Whereas, the NOC is considering development of its property located Northeast of Wilkinson Lake within the City of Lino Lakes which directly drains to the Lake; Whereas, Wilkinson Lake has been identified by the MPCA to be impaired for excess nutrient loading; Whereas, this Study is separate from the NOC development itself, synergies may be leveraged in terms of construction timing and cost reduction for mobilization and contracting. Projects considered in the Study must exceed the NOC development requirements; Whereas, An area adjacent to the NOC proposed development site holds potential for implementing “above and beyond” water quality treatment practice to address these concerns prior to discharge; Whereas, the Study partners including the NOC, City and VLAWMO have reviewed the request for services for development of the Study from ISG Inc. dated (Attachment 1) and find that it provides the necessary work items to achieve its desired Study outcomes; Whereas, participation in financial partnership in the development of this Study does not commit any of the partners to further fund implementation of any practices identified in Study; Whereas, the parties wish to clearly define their respective roles in the development and completion of this Study; Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree to enter into this MOU and to comply with the following processes with respect to the Study: Nov. 26, 2024 DRAFT #2- Memorandum of Understanding- ISG Feasibility Study 1. NOC Responsibilities. NOC agrees to do each of the following: a. Coordinate the consultant hiring process for completion of the Study. b. Share the professional services costs with the VLAWMO to complete the Study. c. Invoice VLAWMO for reimbursements at completion of study for its share of the cost for professional services. d. Provide for management and oversight of the Study. e. Participate in the development of the Study and schedule partner meetings with VLAWMO and The City when needed. f. Provide required notices to affected property owners and other stakeholders as may be necessary. g. Allow the VLAWMO and the City to review and comment on a draft of the Study before finalizing the document. h. Share and distribute results and deliverables of the final Study to the VLAWMO and the City. 2. VLA WMO Responsibilities. VLAWMO agrees to do each of the following: a. Share 66.66 % of the professional services costs to complete the Study with NOC not to exceed $24,912,000. b. Pay invoices received from NOC for reimbursement of professional services costs within 30 days of receipt. c. Attend meetings and participate in discussion related to the development of the Study. d. Provide background information or data (if any) necessary for the preparation of the Study. e. Invoice the City at regular intervals in the Study development process for its share of the cost for professional services. 3. City Responsibilities. The City agrees to do the following: a. Share the professional services costs to complete the Study with VLAWMO, not to exceed $11,061.00. b. Pay invoices received from VLAWMO for reimbursement of professional services costs within 30 days of receipt. c. Attend meetings and participate in discussion related to the development of the Study. d. Provide background information or data (if any) necessary for the preparation of the Study. e. Assist NOC with required notices to affected property owners and other stakeholders as may be necessary. 4. Use of Study. The reports or documents produced in whole or in part under this Nov. 26, 2024 DRAFT #2- Memorandum of Understanding- ISG Feasibility Study MOU will be subject to fair use and may not be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of the NOC, City or VLAWMO. The NOC, City and VLAWMO may use, without restriction, the work products of the Study including, but not limited to, any associated reports and documents. 5. Term. This MOU is effective on the date of the last party to execute it. This MOU shall terminate upon completion of the Study and payment for the professional services costs incurred as provided herein. 6. Termination. Each party has the right to terminate this MOU at any time and for any reason by submitting written notice of the intention to do so to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the specified effective date of such termination. 7. Entire Agreement: Amendments. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding this matter. No amendments to this MOU are valid unless they are in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and is effective as of the date of the last party to execute it. North Oaks Company Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization City of Lino Lakes 6465 Wayzata Boulevard + Suite 970 + St. Louis Park, MN 55426 + 952.426.0699 | ISGInc.com Page 1 RE: Professional Services Proposal for North Oaks Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed Management Organization Feasibility Study Lino Lakes, Minnesota Mark, North Oaks Company, LLC is partnering with ISG on the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, Minnesota within the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization (VLAWMO). The City of Lino Lakes and VLAWMO (the partners) have expressed interest in a partnership to identify opportunities to reduce nutrient loading to Wilkinson Lake, an impaired lake west of the North Oaks’ development site. Projects considered must exceed the development requirements, focus on improving the water quality of Wilkinson Lake, and leverage the design, permitting, and construction timelines resulting in project implementation efficiencies and reduced costs when compared to a stand-alone project. An area adjacent to the site holds potential for implementing a water quality treatment practice to address these concerns prior to discharge. While this project is separate from the development itself, synergies may be leveraged in terms of construction timing and cost reduction for mobilization and contracting. This proposal addresses the discussions held during our meeting on March 26, 2024, involving representatives from North Oaks Company, VLAWMO, and the City of Lino Lakes. ISG was asked to conduct a feasibility study to assess and evaluate three key components related to the potential water quality treatment practice: •Regional Best Management Practice (BMP) for Stormwater: Assess BMP design to provide treatment to reduce nutrients and sediment loading to Wilkinson Lake. •Water Reuse: Evaluate the feasibility of reusing water for irrigation on the proposed development site in lieu of potable groundwater. Identify consistent volumes for decreased strain on infrastructure. •Smart Irrigation Controllers Technology: The implementation of electronic equipment in ground to monitor the soil to utilize less water for irrigation of vegetation. The study would assess what could be accomplished from a reuse water source. Vegetation types are also part of the solution that can be accommodated as part of the design. Based on our understanding, ISG will provide the following scope of services to complete the feasibility study. SCOPE OF SERVICES Feasibility Study for Water Quality Treatment Task 1: Assess Regional Stormwater BMP Opportunities To protect Wilkinson Lake, ISG will use and build off of the previous work of SEH to enhance the feasibility level of design,including soil borings and topographic survey completed by North Oaks Company. ISG will assess the BMP that will most reduce sediment and nutrients given the area’s conditions for flow and constraints of the site. The regional BMP will be generally located to maximize treatment for the water flow north to south crossing Ash Street. November 19, 2024 Mark Houge President North Oaks Company, LLC 5959 Centerville Road North Oaks, MN 55127 651.484.3361 ext. 405 mark@northoaks.com Attachment 1 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com Page 2 November 19, 2024 Geotechnical Evaluation This proposal includes subcontracting with a geotechnical consultant to obtain and evaluate three (3) additional soil borings that will be needed to determine site suitability. ISG will coordinate with the selected consultant to identify appropriate soil boring locations. ISG will review all available data and reports, including the feasibility study that was completed by SEH. Upon review, ISG will assess potential alternatives to reduce loading into Lake Wilkinson to determine opportunities to address TMDL goals. Preliminary costs, permitting requirements, and feasibility for each alternative will be evaluated. It is assumed that the original model will be provided by the watershed. Deliverable (Water Quality) • Summary of preliminary review and evaluation of two (2) alternatives; each alternative will including maintenance schedule and access routes • Site plan with BMP opportunities • Prepare P8 Model for the two (2) alternatives to evaluate water quality • Engineer’s opinion of probable costs • Evaluation of project outcomes that advance progress on TMDL goals • Permit matrix • One (1) meeting with the partners to discuss results Task 2: Evaluate Water Reuse in the North Oaks Development Detention Basins + Stormwater BMPs ISG will review the potential of water reuse from multiple sources in the area. This includes consideration of rainwater captured by the proposed stormwater BMP in Task 1 from runoff to the north of Wilkinson Lake and the proposed stormwater management infrastructure needed for the proposed private development at the southwest corner of Ash Street and Centerville Street. The stormwater BMP option will also include evaluating the quantity of water tributary to the proposed BMP location and the pollutant loads to confirm that the water is suitable as irrigation water for vegetation. The proposed North Oaks Development will be evaluated for volume of water needed for the proposed green space, the necessary detention volume needed, and if a stormwater detention basin can be sized appropriately to draw captured stormwater, the necessary equipment to pump water from the basin to the irrigation system, and potential costs associated with the equipment. Water in Motion will partner with ISG to identify the necessary water quantities on an average annual basis and help select the appropriate equipment and associated pricing at a conceptual pricing level. Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com Page 3 November 19, 2024 Deliverables (Options) • Summary of data collection and review • Summary of ability to reuse water from the three (3) sources mentioned • Reuse concept development and optimization • Conceptual level equipment needs and pricing for each source, if the source is found to be a viable reuse option Task 3: Evaluate Smart Irrigation Controls for the North Oaks Development ISG and Water in Motion will evaluate the possibility of utilizing smart irrigation controller options to manage the use of captured water on proposed irrigation areas and the equipment options available. The review will include a preliminary feasibility study, specifications, estimated potable groundwater reductions, general water use reduction, analysis of appropriate irrigation zones ,irrigation wiring and valve setup, sprinkler head distribution, scheduling and cost estimates. This will consider the use of flow sensors over soil moisture sensors for tracking water use. Deliverable (Options) • A summary of smart irrigation control options for each water source, if the source is found to be a viable reuse option Task 4: Assess Nutrient + Sediment Reduction Loading to Wilkinson Lake ISG will evaluate the combined impacts of the smart irrigation and the regional storm water BMP. In addition to evaluating the combined BMPs, ISG will identify where the most efficient and effective location would be to reduce the nutrient and sediment loading to Wilkinson Lake, specifically in the Wilkinson to Amelia subwatershed. This assumes that general research information states 90–100% of nutrient reduction is occurring with recycled water. This task does not include P8 water quality modeling to substantiate the nutrient reduction. Deliverable (Location) • Identification of the BMP type and optimal location for reducing nutrient and sediment loading to Wilkinson Lake. This is supported by an assessment of the combined effects of smart irrigation and regional stormwater BMPs. Task 5: Feasibility Report Preparation ISG will prepare a feasibility report with findings from the review and evaluation. We will identify potential local, state, and federal grant and funding resources and provide recommendations on the most suitable funding options. Any required permits will be identified within a permit matrix, along with required meetings. A draft of the feasibility report will be provided for review and comment. Feedback will then be incorporated into the final report. Deliverables • Draft feasibility report for review and comment • Partner meeting to make final refinements • Final feasibility report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com Page 4 November 19, 2024 ASSUMPTIONS The North Oaks Company will be responsible for developing a joint powers agreement between the City and VLAWMO. This proposal assumes the St. Paul Regional Water property is not part of this project since it is under a different ownership group. SCHEDULE Regular project team meetings will be scheduled to ensure that the project is being proceeding in a manner that is satisfactory of all parties. The frequency and timing of the regular meetings is yet to be determined. COMPENSATION ISG proposes to provide the scope of work described within this proposal for compensation in the amount listed below, which includes a 20% contingency for unanticipated needs. Anticipated reimbursable expenses such as travel, mileage, and printing are included. Sales tax is excluded from the compensation. Graduate Engineer Civil Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Water in Motion Total Billing Rate (per hour)$135 $165 $185 $165 Effort Per Person $12,150 $8,250 $2,775 $6,105 Task 1: Assess Regional Stormwater BMP Opportunities 30 15 5 0 $7,450 Task 2: Evaluate Water Reuse 20 10 0 18 $7,320 Task 3: Evaluate Smart Irrigation Controls 5 5 0 19 $4,635 Task 4: Assess Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Loading 20 10 5 0 $5,275 Task 5: Feasibility Report Preparation 15 10 5 0 $4,600 Three (3), 10-Foot Soil Borings $9,500 Total $38,780 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com Page 5 November 19, 2024 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ISG’s goal for this proposal, like its services, is to be flexible with accommodating the requirements of this project. Upon request, ISG is able to provide a subsequent proposal to assist with additional professional design and construction phase services that will be necessary to facilitate this project as it moves forward. ISG appreciates the opportunity to provide a solution tailored to the needs of North Oaks Company. Upon acceptance of this proposal, please sign the acknowledgment box and return a copy of the proposal to our office. We look forward to providing you with responsive service, a collaborative approach, and timely delivery. Sincerely, Julie Blackburn, CFM Jerremy Foss, PE, CNU-A Water Business Unit Leader Civil Engineering Group Leader Applicable Contract The General Terms and Conditions applicable to this Proposal are available at the link below and are hereby accepted and incorporated herein by reference. Upon acceptance of this Proposal, the parties can proceed with the project based on this signed Proposal, per its General Terms and Conditions, or for more complex projects, ISG, at its discretion, will prepare and require the use of an AIA or EJCDC Contract that will govern the project. General Terms + Conditions bit.ly/termsconditions_isg Acknowledgment of Acceptance This proposal is valid for 30 days. Accepted this _______ day of _____________, 2024. Company: ____________ Name: ______________ Title: _______________ Signature: ____________ Print Print Print 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-166, Approving Distribution of Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for North Oaks Mixed Use Development VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to distribute the North Oaks Mixed Use Development EAW for public comment. BACKGROUND North Oaks Company, LLC (Developer) is proposing a mixed-use development project on approximately 120 acres abutting Centerville Road and Ash St in the southcentral quadrant of the City. The property is guided for low, medium and high-density residential uses in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Due to the proposed number of residential units, preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required by Minnesota Rules. The process operates according to rules adopted by the state’s Environmental Quality Board (EQB). The EAW document is designed to provide a brief analysis and overview of the potential environmental impacts for a specific project and to help the City, referred to as the Responsible Government Unit (RGU), determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary. The questions contained within the document are established by the EQB. The EAW is not meant to approve or disapprove a project but is simply a source of information to guide other approvals and permitting decisions. In fact, it is one of the advantages to larger scale development projects. Preparation of the EAW will help inform the design of the project before the submittal of a formal development application. The information provided in the EAW was prepared by the development team and reviewed by City Staff and the City’s Engineer WSB and Associates and determined to be complete. The next 2 step in the process is for the City Council to authorize distribution of the document for public comment. A notice of the documents availability will be published in the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor and notification sent to specified public agencies. The document will be available on the City website for review. The public comment period lasts for 30 days. During that period all interested parties may submit written comments to the City. At the end of the 30-day period, the City reviews all of the public comments, as well as the content of the EAW to determine whether the project needs further changes or analysis. The City will prepare a written response to all substantive comments received during the public comment period. Once completed the City Council will determine if potential impacts of the project are significant enough to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. If not, the Council will adopt a finding of no significant impact, and the environmental review process ends. The developer may then begin to prepare the design of the project and the land use application information. Again, the decision to distribute the EAW for public comment or any future decision regarding the need for an EIS is not an approval or disapproval of the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-166. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-166 2. North Oaks Mixed Land Use Development EAW CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-166 RESOLUTION APPROVING DISTRIBUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR NORTH OAKS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Rules Chapter 4410 establishes the requirements for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW); and WHEREAS, North Oaks Company , LLC is proposing a mixed use development that would require an EAW based on its proposed number of dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the City has initiated an environmental review to determine if a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, as required by 4410.1000, Subpart 2; and WHEREAS, the project proposer has submitted data for an EAW and the City has reviewed the submitted data and determined to the best of the City’s knowledge that the EAW is complete and accurate; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that hereby approves the distribution of the North Oaks Mixed Use Development EAW for public comment as required by MN Rules 4410.1500. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk Page 1 Environmental Assessment Worksheet This most recent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and guidance documents are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/ The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Guidance documents provide additional detail and links to resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 21. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: North Oaks Mixed Use Development 2. Proposer: North Oaks Company LLC 3. RGU: City of Lino Lakes Contact person: Lauren Grouws Contact person: Katie Larsen Title: VP Development Title: City Planner Address: 5959 Centerville Road, Suite 200 Address: 600 Town Center Parkway City, State, ZIP: North Oaks, MN 55127 City, State, ZIP: Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Phone: 253.312.6913 Phone: 651.982.2426 Fax: Fax: Email: Lauren@northoaks.com Email: klarsen@linolakes.us 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): MN Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 19 5. Project Location:  County: Anoka  City/Township: Lino Lakes  PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): Secs 34 & 35, T31N, R22W  Watershed (81 major watershed scale): 20 – Mississippi River – Twin Cities  GPS Coordinates: 45° 7'33.52"N, 93° 4'16.09"W Page 2  Tax Parcel Number: 34-31-22-34-0001, 34-31-22-43-0006, 34-31-22-43-0007, 34-31-22-43-0008, 34- 31-22-43-0010, 34-31-22-44-0001, 34-31-22-44-0006, 34-31-22-44-0008, 35-31-22-33-0002. At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW:  County map showing the general location of the project; (See Appendix A – Figure 1)  U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); (See Appendix A – Figure 2)  Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post-construction site plan. (See Exhibit A)  List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the project during the life of the project (as detailed below in item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience). 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The North Oaks Company LLC is proposing construction of a mixed-use development located in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. The project will include the construction of senior housing, market-rate apartments, affordable housing, commercial space, and single-family lots. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities The Project will consist of the construction of a new mixed-use development. This will consist of a combination of single family residential homes, townhomes, apartment complexes, senior living, and retail space. 1) Construction activities that will manipulate the environment will include tree removals, site preparation and earthwork, utility installation, and the construction of new structures including housing units and retail stores as well as the construction of roads, walks/trails, and stormwater ponds. See Appendix B for the current site plan of the project. Construction wastes will be generated during the project construction. 2) N/A, there are no existing equipment or industrial processes located within the project area. 3) N/A, there are no existing structures located within the project area. 4) Site preparation work is anticipated to begin as soon as spring 2025. Site construction is anticipated to take place over the course of multiple phases which will occur over the course of several years dependent upon market conditions. Page 3 c. Project magnitude: Description Number Total Project Acreage 120.0 Linear project length N/A Number and type of residential units Single Family: 71 Lots (71 Units) 4-Plex: 5 Buildings (20 Units) 6-Plex: 6 Buildings (36 Units) Apartment: 2 Buildings (200 Units) Senior Living: 1 Building (100 Units) Residential building area (in square feet) 38.2 Acres Commercial building area (in square feet) 4.1 Acres (178,596 SF) Industrial building area (in square feet) 0.00 Institutional building area (in square feet) 0.00 Other uses – (in square feet) 0.00 Structure height(s) Apartments = 40’ Townhomes = 35’ Single Family Home = 35’ Retail = 30’ d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of this project is to create new housing opportunities within the City of Lino Lakes, as well as the construction of new retail opportunities. This project is not being carried out by a governmental unit. The need for this project is demonstrated by the following goal of the Housing Plan laid out in The City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan (November 9, 2020), hereinafter referred to as The 2040 Plan: “Improve availability of affordable and life-cycle housing”. Development of this project would help the city meet these goals by providing new housing opportunities for existing and future residents of Lino Lakes looking for single-family or multi- family housing options. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. Construction of this project will occur in phases. Additionally, one ghost plat is included in the project area that may or may not end up as part of the project (See Concept 1 within Appendix B). This EAW is covering the project as a whole and includes the ghost plat area in order to incorporate all potential future impacts. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. N/A Page 4 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience: a. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the project. Climate trends in Minnesota have included warmer temperatures and increased rainfall. According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) climate trends webpage1 between 1895 and 2020 average temperatures have warmed by 3.0 degrees Fahrenheit and annual precipitation has increased by an average of 3.4 inches. The local trends within Anoka County have been consistent with the statewide trends as evidenced from the graphs below. These upward trends in average temperature and precipitation are expected to continue at the project site over the life of the Project. Projected climate graphs are included below. 1 https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/climateexplorer/main/historical Page 5 Page 6 b. For each Resource Category in the table below: Describe how the project’s proposed activities and how the project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the project effects identified. Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Adaptations Project Design Development may negatively affect urban heat island conditions in the area. Climate change risks and vulnerabilities identified include:  Roofing materials and asphalt will absorb heat during the day and radiate it at night, which increases the urban heat island effect Landscaping and greenspace will reduce heat island effect. Land Use Land use conversion will increase the amount of impervious surface area. Climate change risks and vulnerabilities identified include:  Approximately 18 acres of impervious surface will be created from the project. The project includes nine stormwater ponds designed to store and treat stormwater generated from the site. Page 7 Water Resources Address in item 12 Address in item 12 Address in item 12 Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/Wastes Waste materials will be generated from the construction of the Project. Climate change risks and vulnerabilities identified include:  Wastes generated from construction will likely include solid waste and washout water. Any hazardous waste products generated or stored within the project area during construction will be properly contained and disposed of. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) Address in item 14. Address in item 14. Address in item 14. 8. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Cover Types Before (acres) After (acres) Wetlands and shallow lakes (<2 meters deep) 44.1 43.4 Deep lakes (>2 meters deep) 0.0 0.0 Wooded/forest 11.2 8.3 Rivers/streams 0.0 0.0 Brush/Grassland 8.1 10.6 Cropland 55.6 0.0 Livestock rangeland/pastureland 0.0 0.0 Lawn/landscaping 1.0 27.1 Green infrastructure TOTAL (from table below*) 0.0 0.0 Impervious surface 0.0 25.9 Stormwater Pond (wet sedimentation basin) 0.0 4.7 Other 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 120.0 120.0 *Existing land cover can be seen in Appendix A – Figure 3. Proposed land cover can be seen in Appendix A – Figure 4. Page 8 Green Infrastructure* Before (acreage) After (acreage) Constructed infiltration systems (infiltration basins/infiltration trenches/rainwater gardens/ bioretention areas without underdrains/swales with impermeable check dams) 0.0 0.0 Constructed tree trenches and tree boxes 0.0 0.0 Constructed wetlands 0.0 0.0 Constructed green roofs 0.0 0.0 Constructed permeable pavements 0.0 0.0 Other (describe) 0.0 0.0 TOTAL* 0.0 0.0 Trees Percent Number Percent tree canopy removed or number of mature trees removed during development 25% Undetermined at this time Number of new trees planted N/A Undetermined at this time 9. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Unit of Government Type of Application Status U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit To be Submitted Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Watermain Extension Permit To be Submitted Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Water Appropriation Permit (Construction Dewatering) To be Submitted, if necessary Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) General Permit To be Submitted Sanitary Sewer Extension Approval To be Submitted Section 401 Water Quality Certification or Waiver To be Submitted Page 9 Unit of Government Type of Application Status Rice Creek Watershed District Wetland Conservation Act Delineation Boundary Concurrence Approved Wetland Mitigation Plan To be Submitted Stormwater Management Permit To be Submitted Erosion and Sediment Control Plan To be Submitted Floodplain Alteration Permit To be Submitted Wetland Alteration Permit To be Submitted Anoka County Access Permit(s) To be Submitted Right-of-Way Permit(s) To be Submitted City of Lino Lakes Rezoning To be Submitted Plat To be Submitted Municipal Water Connection Permit To be Submitted Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit To be Submitted Grading Permit To be Submitted Building Permit To be Submitted Stormwater Management Permit To be Submitted Erosion and Sediment Control Plan To be Submitted Floodplain Alteration Permit To be Submitted Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10-20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. 10. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks and open space, cemeteries, trails, prime or unique farmlands. Existing land use of the site consists primarily of cultivated agricultural fields and wetland areas. The Existing Land Use Map within The 2040 Plan has the Project site mapped as Agricultural and Open Water (Appendix C). Existing land cover on site can be seen in Appendix A – Figure 3. Page 10 Adjacent land consists primarily of similar land uses, such as agricultural, open water/wetland areas, rural residential lots, as well as single family residential to the south. The Project site as well as adjacent farmland to the west, include mapped soils considered prime farmland. There are no parks and open space, cemeteries, trails located adjacent to the Project site. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The Future Land Use Plan within The 2040 Plan has portions of the Project site listed for primarily residential land use. This includes areas of low, medium, and high density residential (Appendix C). These are defined within The 2040 Plan as 1.6 to 3, 4 to 6, and 6 to 8 dwellings per acre respectively. A portion of the Project site was also mapped as a Signature Gateway District. This district is defined in The 2040 Plan as follows: “The Signature Gateway District is reserved for high visibility, high traffic corridors serving as an entrance to the Community. The district allows residential at a density of 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre with 15 units per acre allowed if the project meets the City's housing goals. The district allows for development of multiple complementary uses on a single site including a combination of higher density residential, commercial services, and employment opportunities. This district incorporates planning parameters estimating the ratio of the residential and commercial mix. These ranges are flexible and may change based on a specific development proposal.” iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The Project site is currently zoned as R – Rural per the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Map (January 5, 2023). There are areas of FEMA Zone A Floodplain mapped within the project site (See FEMA FIRM in Appendix C). There are no wild and scenic river segments, critical areas, agricultural preserves, or airport safety zones located within or adjacent to the project site. iv. If any critical facilities (i.e. facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. The are no critical facilities currently located within the Project site or proposed to be constructed as part of the project. b. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. There are no identified compatibility conflicts between the proposed project and nearby land uses or any local or regional plans. The existing zoning, however, is not compatible with the proposed land use. Page 11 c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 10b above and any risk potential. The Project site will be rezoned with the City of Lino Lakes to bring it in line with the Future Land Use Map (Appendix C) within The 2040 Plan. Impacts within the floodplain will be permitted through the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 11. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. Minnesota Geological Survey data within the Project site lists the bedrock geology as St. Peter sandstone and Prairie du Chien Group. Depths to the bedrock ranged from approximately 90 to 180 feet. There are no known or mapped sinkholes, shallow limestone, shallow aquifers, or karst features identified within or near the project area. Karst features are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 5. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 12.b.ii. NRCS soil classifications with the Project Site and are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 6, soils unit characteristics are provided in the following table. Map Symbol Soil Unit Name Slopes (%) HEL* Hydrologic Group** Hydric Rating*** Farmland Classification AnC Anoka loamy fine sand 6-12 NHEL A Non-Hydric Not prime farmland Bm Blomford loamy fine sand - NHEL B/D Predominately Hydric Not prime farmland BtB Braham loamy fine sand 2-6 NHEL A Predominately Non-Hydric Farmland of statewide importance Cb Cathro muck - NHEL B/D Hydric Not prime farmland Page 12 Map Symbol Soil Unit Name Slopes (%) HEL* Hydrologic Group** Hydric Rating*** Farmland Classification Du Dundas loam - NHEL B/D Predominately Hydric Prime farmland if drained HdB Hayden fine sandy loam 2-6 NHEL B Predominately Non-Hydric All areas are prime farmland HdC2 Hayden fine sandy loam, eroded 6-12 PHEL B Non-Hydric Farmland of statewide importance Iw Isanti fine sandy loam - NHEL A/D Predominately Hydric Not prime farmland Kr Kratka loamy fine sand - NHEL B/D Hydric Not prime farmland Lb Lake beaches - NHEL A/D Predominately Non-Hydric Not prime farmland Lw Loamy wet land - NHEL B/D Hydric Prime farmland if drained Ma Markey muck, occasionally ponded 0-1 NHEL A/D Hydric Not prime farmland Mc Marsh - NHEL A/D Hydric Not prime farmland NeA Nessel fine sandy loam 1-4 NHEL C Predominately Non-Hydric All areas are prime farmland Rf Rifle mucky peat - NHEL A/D Hydric Not prime farmland SoA Soderville fine sand 0-3 NHEL A/D Predominately Non-Hydric Farmland of statewide importance ZmB Zimmerman fine sand 1-6 NHEL A Predominately Non-Hydric Not prime farmland ZmC Zimmerman fine sand 6-12 NHEL A Predominately Non-Hydric Not prime farmland *Highly Erodible Land **Infiltration Rate ***Percent Hydric Rating HEL: Highly Erodible Land A: >0.30 in/hr Hydric: 100% PHEL: Potentially Highly Erodible Land B: 0.15-0.30 in/hr Predominately Hydric: ≥ 67% & <100% NHEL: Not Highly Erodible Land C: 0.05-0.15 ins/hr Partially Hydric: ≥ 33% & <67% D: <0.05 in/hr Predominately Non-Hydric: ≤ 1% & <33% Not Hydric: 0% The erosion capabilities of the soils are susceptible as described by the NRCS Soil Erodibility (Kw) Factor rating which ranges across the site from 0.10 to 0.32. Construction activities will temporarily expose soils to an increased risk of erosion from wind and precipitation. Appropriate erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will be selected based on current site conditions and maintained through the duration of each construction phase to reduce the potential of sedimentation occurring to surface water resources or migrating offsite. Temporary BMPs will be inspected and maintained (per the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit) until permanent vegetation and stabilization has occurred. Permanent BMPs will be incorporated into project design to minimize erosion during routine operational activities (post-construction). Page 13 A geotechnical evaluation of the site has been completed which included 16 soil borings across the site. A map of the boring locations and detailed description of the soils observed at each is included in Exhibit D – Geotechnical Report. Recommendation provided within the report for design and consideration have been taken into account including performing soil corrections during subgrade preparation and performing dewatering during excavations. Topography of the Project site, collected via LiDAR, is illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 7. Site elevations were shown ranging from 894 to 932 msl. Site topography generally slopes northwest towards Cedar Lake within the western half of the site and south toward Wilkinson Lake within the eastern half. Some areas of steep slopes (12% or greater) are present within the site.  NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 12 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 11. 12. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, shoreland classification and floodway/floodplain, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include the presence of aquatic invasive species and the water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. There are two DNR Public Waters Basins, Cedar Lake (02001200) and Wilkinson Lake (62004300) located partially within the project area. Cedar Lake is located within the western half of the Project site and continues offsite to the north; Wilkinson Lake is located within the east half and continues offsite to the south. There are no DNR Public Waters watercourses, designated wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting areas, trout streams/lakes, MPCA or MDNR listed calcareous fens, outstanding resource value waters, and county or jurisdictional ditches within or adjacent to the project area. Ten wetland areas have been delineated within the Project site totally approximately 44.1 acres. These wetlands include 2, 3, and 6 wetlands with Wet Meadow, Shallow Marsh, and Shrub-carr plant communities as well as Type 1 farmed wetland areas. Prominent water features located within 1 mile of the project site include the aforementioned Cedar and Wilkinson Lakes, fourteen additional DNR Public Waters Basins, as well as one DNR Public Waters Watercourse. Refer to the table below for a list of the waterbodies. Page 14 Waterbody Name PWI Label PWI Number Distance from Site Shoreland Classification Impairments Cedar Public Water Basin 2001200 0.00 Mi Natural Environment None Wilkinson Public Water Basin 62004300 0.00 Mi Natural Environment Nutrients Amelia Public Water Basin 2001400 0.06 Mi NE Natural Environment None Unnamed Public Water Watercourse M-053.5-006 0.36 Mi S None None Otter Public Water Basin 2000300 0.46 Mi E Recreational Development Hg-F Unnamed Public Water Wetland 2056400 0.52 Mi NW None None Deep Public Water Basin 62001800 0.53 Mi SW Recreational Development None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 2056300 0.76 Mi N None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 62009302 0.81 Mi S None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 62009100 0.82 Mi SE None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 62009301 0.84 Mi S None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 2056200 0.93 M NE None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 62009200 0.94 Mi S None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 2055500 0.95 Mi N None None Unnamed Public Water Basin 2056500 0.96 Mi NW None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 62009000 0.98 Mi SE None None Unnamed Public Water Wetland 2057000 0.99 Mi NE None None There are two MPCA Section 303d listed impaired waters located within a 1-mile radius of the project site. This included a deep-water portion of Wilkinson Lake mapped outside of the Project site as well as Otter Lake. Wilkinson Lake was listed for Aquatic Recreation due to Nutrients while Otter Lake was listed for Aquatic Consumption due to Mercury in Fish Tissue (Hg-F). Surface water resources located within and adjacent to the Project site are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 8. Page 15 ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. 1) The depth to ground water appears to vary greatly across the site. During the geotechnical evaluation of the site 16 soil borings were completed across the site. Water tables, when they were observed, ranged from 894.9’ to 919.1’ MSL. A map of the boring locations and boring logs documenting water tables observed is included in Appendix D – Geotechnical Report. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Cooperative Groundwater Monitoring Website maintains data on ground water levels. The closest, actively read, observation well to the Project site is DNR Observation Well #02012 (MDH #208573), which is located approximately 2 miles north of the Project site. The water level in the most recent data record (September 27, 2024) was measured at 890.57’ MSL. 2) The Project site is not located within any Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). However, the Project site is located within close proximity to the Lino Lakes East WHPA. The boundary of the Lino Lakes East WHPA is illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 9. Per the City’s 2015 Wellhead Protection Plan, the Project site is located within the moderate vulnerability portion of the City’s 2020 Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) Evaluation that incorporated Well No. 6, which will appear in the City’s next Wellhead Protection Plan update around 2025. 3) According to the Minnesota Department of Health – Minnesota Well Index, there is one identified well located within the Project site. This was Well #420603, a domestic well. Groundwater resources located within and adjacent to the Project site are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 9. b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. The Project site is located within the City of Lino Lakes’ Sewer District 4. Per The 2040 Plan, future improvements within this district will discharge to the White Bear Township trunk sanitary sewer in Centerville Road, then to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) regional interceptor collection system, and ultimately to the MCES Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Page 16 Construction of new sanitary sewer lines will be required to service the project. The projected wastewater flow rate for the site following construction is an average flow rate of 88,800 gallons per day with a peak flow rate of 199,700 gallons per day. The City of Lino Lakes and White Bear Township will execute an agreement for the utilization of a portion of the capacity in the White Bear Township trunk sanitary sewer. The proposed residential and retail land uses are expected to generate wastewater of typical domestic strength and character. The location of the Metro WWTP and existing interceptors are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 10. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. If septic systems are part of the project, describe the availability of septage disposal options within the region to handle the ongoing amounts generated as a result of the project. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. N/A. Currently none of the parcels that comprise the project site utilize subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS). Several of the adjacent properties currently utilize a SSTS. These properties will be unaffected by the Project. The locations of the adjacent properties with existing SSTS are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 10. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. N/A ii. Stormwater - Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post construction including how the project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. For projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. Page 17 The quality of existing stormwater runoff from the project is typical of agricultural land. Stormwater runoff flows from upland areas to lower elevations on site as sheet flow where it generally gets conveyed into either Cedar or Wilkinson Lake. Up to approximately 60 acres of land are expected to be impacted during construction. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed for the project to ensure protection of water resources during construction. Due to the adjacent Wilkinson Lake, an impaired water, the special provisions for impaired waters included within the Minnesota Construction Stormwater General Permit will be included within the SWPPP. Temporary erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will initially be installed (per the project’s SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended throughout the construction phases as required to remain compliant with the applicant’s NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. BMPs may include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock construction entrances, mulch/hydro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. The quality of stormwater runoff from the project post construction will be typical of an urban land use with impervious surfaces and lawn/landscaping generally generating higher concentrations of total suspended solids and total phosphorus. Stormwater runoff is proposed to be conveyed into permanent constructed stormwater treatment infrastructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated swales, etc.) across the site for treatment prior to discharge. These features will be designed to reduce flows to receiving waters and to accommodate for the increased precipitation projected to occur based on climate trends. Flow reductions will be calculated and included within the required stormwater management permits. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. No appropriations of surface waters are proposed as part of the Project. Water will be sourced from the City of Lino Lakes’s existing public water supply system (PWS # 1020023) and/or the White Bear Township existing public water supply system (PWS # 1620025). The Lino Lakes PWS is currently sourced from five groundwater wells (MDH #s 240171, 559373, 554207, 722629, and 767887). Construction of new watermains will be required to service the project. . The projected water demand for the site is an average flow rate per capita of 88,800 gallons per day with a peak flow rate per capita of 199,700 gallons per day. Page 18 Short-term temporary construction dewatering of surface or ground waters may be required at the time of construction (depending on current field conditions) to facilitate construction activities (e.g., utility installation, etc.). If dewatering is anticipated to exceed 10,000 gallons per day or 1,000,000 gallons per year, the contractor will be required to obtain a Water Appropriations Permit from the Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Division of Waters prior to initiating such activities. Measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the environmental effects from construction related to dewatering are unknown at this time, and therefore will be determined when developing the dewatering plan as required by a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan amendment of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. Approximately 44 acres of wetland are located throughout the Project site. The site was field delineated in 2022 by Kjolhaug Environmental Services. Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (Appendix B). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be determined by the proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. Page 19 No other surface water features (lakes, streams, intermittent channels, or county/jurisdictional ditches) will be physically or indirectly altered during the construction or operation of the proposed project. Cedar and Wilkinson Lakes were avoided during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (Appendix B). Temporary erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will initially be installed (per the project’s SWPPP), maintained/repaired, and amended throughout the construction phases to avoid indirect impacts to water resources. BMPs may include (but are not limited to) silt fence, bio-rolls/filter logs, rock construction entrances, mulch/hydro mulch, and permanent native seeding or turf seeding in appropriate areas. Following construction, permanent constructed stormwater treatment infrastructure (e.g. infiltration basins, filtration basins, holding ponds, vegetated swales, etc.) will help protect and provide storage and treatment to waters prior to discharging into water resources. 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) records do not indicate any current or former contamination sites within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The MPCA’s What’s In My Neighborhood database of known sites within proximity of the project area is illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 11. There were two documented petroleum leaks within close proximity to the project site. These leaks occurred at the Biolab Corporation and Holiday Stationstore #3567 sites, both of which were located approximately 0.07 miles southeast of the project site. The Biolab site had a release documented on March 6, 1990, which was issued regulatory site closure on January 15, 1991. The Holiday site had releases documented on October 11, 2007 and April 7, 2017. These releases were issued regulatory site closures on July 7, 2008, and December 21, 2017 respectively. The project proposer anticipates a minimal risk of encountering contaminated materials or groundwater during construction based on the lack of past land uses and due to geographic location of the listed leak sites in relation to the project area. Project construction and operation is not expected to cause or exacerbate a pre-project contaminated condition(s); therefore, no measures are planned to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. If potentially contaminated materials (or other environmental hazards) are discovered during construction activities, the project proposer/contractor will immediately cease activities in the area, then take appropriate and reasonable actions to contain and reduce the human health/environmental risk prior to contacting the State of Minnesota Duty Officer, Anoka County, and project proposer’s representative. The development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan will be initiated if analytical results characterize the discovered materials as a regulated contaminated waste. Page 20 b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Solid and liquid wastes generated from construction materials and equipment are expected in minimal amounts during periods of active construction. Wastes may include sediment laden construction dewatering or typical construction debris associated with residential development (lumber, siding, roofing materials, etc.). The contractor will be required to immediately haul offsite and/or temporarily store and dispose (or recycle) of all waste in accordance with MPCA regulations and the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any new above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Indicate the number, location, size and age of existing tanks on the property that the project will use. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Hazardous materials (portable fuel tanks and lubricants) may be used for equipment operations during construction and temporarily placed onsite in sealed containers (at all times) and under secured restricted access during non-working hours. These materials will only be used during active construction for refueling and maintenance of construction equipment. To ensure that fuel spills do not contaminate surface and ground waters, construction and maintenance activities would occur at reasonable distances from surface waters and steep sloped areas. The contractor will be required to abide by the Pollution Prevention Management Measures (Part IV.F.2) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. All hazardous materials will be removed from the Project site upon completion of construction. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling Hazardous waste storage and disposal associated with construction activities will comply with the NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan during periods of construction. Following construction, the development is not anticipated to generate significant volumes of hazardous wastes. 14. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. Page 21 Ecological land units for the project area have been mapped and defined in the Ecological Classification System (ECS), which has been adopted by the Minnesota DNR. The project location occurs in the St. Paul Baldwin Plains and Moraines subsection (222Md). The St. Paul Baldwin Plains and Moraines subsection largely consists of the eastern half of Twin Cities metropolitan area and is dominated by urban land use. The Project site itself largely consists of agricultural and wetland areas. Wetlands comprise approximately 44 acres of the site. This includes multiple wetland plant communities including Type 1 – Seasonally Flooded Basin, Type 2 – Fresh (wet) Meadow, Type 3 – Shallow Marsh, and Type 6 – Shrub- carr. b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- ) and/or correspondence number (MCE ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage Review letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. There were no mapped Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) Sites of Biodiversity Significance or native plant communities located within the Project site. MCBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance and native plant communities are present adjacent to the Project site within Wilkinson Lake. This included the North Oaks Natural Area MCBS site which has biodiversity significance rating of Outstanding. Within this MCBS site were two MnDNR mapped native plant communities, a Marsh system and a Wet Meadow/Carr system. These were mapped approximately 80’ to the south of the Project site. MBS sites and Native Plant Communities are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 12. Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) data for Anoka County has been obtained by ISG via a license agreement with the Minnesota DNR (2023-018). A review of the database identified 1 rare feature within the Project site that could have the potential to be adversely affected by the proposed project. This rare feature was the Blanding’s Turtle. The were two mapped element occurrences of the Blanding’s Turtle that overlapped with the Project site. An official NHIS Review of the project was completed (MCE-2024-00460). A copy of the review letter is included within Appendix C. In addition to the Blanding’s Turtle this letter identified the Forster’s tern and tricolored bat in the vicinity of the Project site. A U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Official Species List for the Project site, generated from the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)2, listed one federally listed endangered species, the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (RPBB). There was one species, the Salamander Mussel, listed as Proposed Endangered, one species, the Western Regal Fritillary, listed as Proposed Threatened, as well a one Candidate species, the Monarch Butterfly. There was one additional species listed, the Whooping Crane, which had a designation of Non-essential Experimental Population. There were no critical habitats mapped within the project site. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Official Species List can be seen in Exhibit C. 2 https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/ Page 22 c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project including how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Existing plant communities will be affected by the change in land use. The prominent land use that will be converted is active agricultural land which provides poor habitat for wildlife. Impacts to more sensitive natural areas including Wilkinson and Cedar lakes were avoided and minimized to the extent feasible. An approximate 0.7 acres of unavoidable permanent wetland impacts are anticipated to occur as a result of the construction of the Project. Wetland impacts were limited to currently farmed wetland areas. Additionally, approximately 2.9 acres of wooded land will be removed. The habitat of the RPBB varies throughout the year. Per the DNR NHIS Letter “April through October this species uses underground nests in upland grasslands, shrublands, and forest edges, and forages where nectar and pollen are available. From October through April the species overwinters under tree litter in upland forests and woodlands.” Due to several of these habitats being present within the Project site, it was determined that the project will result in a “May Effect” for the RPBB. Monarch butterfly’s live in a variety of habitats but need nectar sources for food and can only lay eggs on milkweed plants. There is potential for Monarch Butterfly to be located at the Project site. Due to this, it was determined that the project will result in a “May Effect” for the Monarch butterfly. Salamander Mussels inhabits rivers, streams, and in some cases lakes with natural flow regimes. None of these habitats will be impacted by the Project. As a result, it was determined that the project will result in a “No Effect” determination to the Salamander Mussel. Measures to prevent the spread of invasive species during construction include working in non-infested areas first before moving to infested areas, thoroughly cleaning equipment after working in infested areas and before mobilizing to a different portion of the project site or a different project and revegetating disturbed areas as soon as possible after construction is completed in an area. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, ecosystems, and sensitive ecological resources. Unavoidable wetland impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent feasible, considering the site constraints of each proposed wetland impact and surrounding area (such as special considerations per MN Rules 8420.0515). Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (Appendix B). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be determined by the proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. Page 23 Recommendations and requirements provided by the DNR within the NHIS review letter will be implemented into the project. This includes preparing a Blanding’s Turtle Avoidance Plan, which will be submitted to the NHIS team for review and approval, avoiding initial disturbance to wetland area between April 15-July 15, and avoiding tree removal between June 1-August 15. Additional consultation will be held with the USFWS regarding the Rusty Patch Bumble Bee. 15. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. An Official Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) review of the project was requested. The following response was received: “Due to limited staff and resources, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office is no longer able to provide formal responses to technical assistance requests”. A review of the Minnesota’s Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP) in lieu of the formal review, was recommended within the SHPO correspondence. No known historic features were mapped within the Project site. The entirety of the Project site was within an area mapped as “Restricted” with a Historic Inventory Number of AN-LKC-00013. In addition, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and Minnesota Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) Portal were reviewed with no known historic or archaeological features mapped within the Project site. No impacted to any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties are anticipated to occur as part of the project. A copy of the SHPO correspondence can be seen in Appendix F. MnSHIP and NRHP resources are illustrated on Appendix A – Figure 13. 16. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. There are portions of Cedar and Wilkinson Lakes located within the Project site. These water bodies are currently landlocked within private property and is not visible to the public from existing Rights-of-Way. Development of the Project will avoid impacting these areas to the extent feasible and will provide scenic views of the water body within the future neighborhood from roads, sidewalks, homes, and yards. The completed Project will not create any significant visual nuisances such as intense light pollution or vapor plumes. Visual impacts will consist of nighttime lighting consisting of streetlamps and yard lights typical of residential development and required for public safety reasons. Page 24 17. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. The Project is not anticipated to result in any temporary or permanent stationary sources of air emissions. There are no existing permitted air facilities or sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the proposed Project. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. The project will result in an increase to local traffic. This will result in an increase to local vehicle air emissions. A number of recommended improvements to the public roadway network have been included within the Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Examples include adding dedicated turn lanes to intersections and reevaluating posted speed limits to aid in traffic circulation and reduce stationary idling times. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report is included in Appendix H – Traffic Impact Study. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. Dust common to construction and earth moving practices is expected (in the form of fugitive dust) during periods of dry weather. Dust will be visually monitored and recorded in conjunction with the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit inspections. Appropriate dust control best management practices (such as soil wetting, misting/water vapor, and hydraulic additives) may be implemented (upon inspection or public complaint) by the contractor as necessary to control dust from leaving the Project site during all phases of construction. Specific dust control best management practices will be determined based on severity, weather conditions (i.e. wind speed), and current site conditions. Dust and odors caused from vehicles parked within driveways and along streets will vary depending on the number and types of vehicles actively moving in one area and current weather conditions. Pollutants generated from vehicle exhausts may concentrate and linger (possibly where vehicles congregate) which may cause a short-term odor that eventually dissipates. Page 25 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project-specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. Two phases of the project need to be quantified, the construction phase and the operation phase. Greenhouse gases (GHGs) commonly include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), fluorinated gases (chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)). There are three types of emissions: Scope 1, 2, and 3. All estimated/projected GHG emissions are provided on an average lifetime (50- year) annualized basis using the CO2 equivalent (CO2eq). Construction Emissions GHGs emitted during the construction phase are primarily from mobile equipment (passenger cars, trucks, and construction equipment). The U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors for GHG inventories was used to calculate emissions from ‘mobile sources’ during the construction phase. It was assumed the construction would last for approximately 72 weeks (6-day weeks). Emissions were divided by the project timeline (50 years) to get annualized emissions. Operation Emission – Mobile Sources A total of 3054 trips per day are estimated to be generated by the project (See Appendix H). This included 1527 trips entering and leaving. To estimate traffic emissions, it was assumed that this was 1527 unique passenger vehicles. It was assumed each vehicle travels 12,000 miles per year or 33 miles per day. The fuel efficiency of said vehicles was estimated at 25 miles per gallon (based on the average for model year 2015 and 2020 to incorporate varying vehicle ages). It was also assumed future residents drive gasoline-powered, light duty vehicles. Off-site Electricity Production Emissions from electricity production offsite were based on the U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors for GHG Inventories based on the upper Midwest (MRO West) Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) subregion. To estimate annual energy usage, data from the Minnesota Energy Data Dashboard was utilized. Specifically, the electric demand per single family residential unit of 800KWh/month and the demand per apartment unit of 550KWh/month. Off-site Waste Management Emission factors from U.S. EPA’s Center for Corporate Climate Leadership (CCCL) GHG Emission Hub were utilized to provide estimates of offsite waste management emissions. According to the U.S. EPA, in 2018 292.4 million short tons of municipal solid waste was generated (4.9 pounds per person per day). With 327 living units with an estimated 2 persons per unit, as well ass 100 senior living units a total of 754 persons was estimated for the site GHG calculations were conducted using the ISG Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator (ISGHG). The ISGGHG is similar to the EPA’s Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (SGEC) and is based on the Revised Environmental Assessment Worksheet Guidance (EQB, 2022). Refer to Appendix G for GHG calculations. Page 26 The following tables are examples; other layouts are acceptable for providing GHG quantification results. Construction Emissions Scope Type of Emission Emission Sub-type Project-related CO2e Emissions (tons/year) Calculation method(s) Scope 1 Combustion Mobile Equipment 4.62 ISGHG Scope 1 Land Use Conversion N/A N/A Scope 1 Land Use Carbon Sink N/A N/A TOTAL 4.62 ISGHG Operational Emissions Scope Type of Emission Emission Sub-type Existing facility CO2e Emissions (tons/year) Project- related CO2e Emissions (tons/year) Total CO2e Emissions (tons/year) Calculation method(s) Scope 1 Combustion Mobile Equipment 0 6,829.24 6,829.24 ISGHG Scope 1 Combustion Stationary Equipment 0 0 0 N/A Scope 1 Combustion Area 0 0 0 N/A Scope 1 Non- Combustion Stationary Equipment 0 0 0 N/A Scope 1 Land Use Carbon Sink 0 0 0 N/A Scope 2 Off-site Electricity Grid-based 0 1,577.82 1,577.82 ISGHG Scope 2 Off-site Steam Production Not applicable 0 0 0 N/A Scope 3 Off-site Waste Management Area 0 386.34 386.34 ISGHG TOTAL 0 8,793.40 8,793.40 ISGHG b. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Due to the minimal emissions that will result from the project (<25,000 TPY CO2e Emitted) no mitigation measures were deemed necessary. However, tree plantings will be a part of the project which will provide carbon sequestration. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. N/A. Page 27 iii. Quantify the proposed projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/#of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. Utilizing ISGHG the projected annual CO2e emissions from the operation of the project was 8,793 tons/year. With a projected project life of 50 years the net CO2e emissions are 439,670 tons. This represents a very small amount when compared to state-wide GHG emissions and would have minimal effect on the State of Minnesota’s or the local area’s GHG reduction goals. 19. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. 1) Existing noise in the Project area includes vehicle traffic from adjacent roads. 2) Sensitive receptors located within proximity to the project site include adjacent residential homes. 3) Exterior noise while construction is taking place may range from 65-95 dBA. Post-construction exterior noise is anticipated to be generated from intermittent traffic and recreational activities. All exterior noise is expected to be less than the State of Minnesota noise rules in a residential land use setting (<65 dBA daytime & <55 dBA nighttime). 4) Nearby residential homes may experience a temporary increase in noise duration and frequency during construction; however, these noises will be conducted during restricted hours. Post construction noise will be typical of surrounding residential areas and will not exceed the State of Minnesota statutory limits for residential receptors (NAC 1), Minnesota Rules 7030.0040, therefore, any noise anticipated from standard operations and construction activities will not result in a decreased quality of life. 20. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. 1) Currently the site has no designated parking stalls. Post construction there will be, 803 parking stalls across the site. Additionally, street parking will be available across much of the rural residential portions of the site. 2) The estimated total average daily traffic generated is approximately 3,790 vehicle trips per day. A detailed breakdown of site traffic is available in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report included in Appendix H – Traffic Impact Analysis. Page 28 3) The project is estimated to generate 279 vehicle trips at peak hour of adjacent street traffic on weekday mornings (7:30 AM to 8:30 AM) and 519 vehicle trips at peak hour of adjacent street traffic on weekday afternoons (4:15 PM to 5:15 PM). See table below for reference. 4) Estimates were generated utilizing the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). 5) Alternative methods of transportation include public transportation via Anoka County’s Travel Transit Link, a regional service connecting customers from Lino Lakes to fixed-route transit services. Additionally, trails are proposed as part of the upcoming intersection reconstruction project for the intersections of CSAH J / Ash Street, CSAH 21 / Centerville Road, and CSAH 32 / Ash Street. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance, The project will result in an increase to local traffic. Recommended improvements to the roadway network have been included within the Traffic Impact Analysis Report, including adding sidewalks or shared use paths to the development roadway network and ensuring highway easements are planned within the development for future roadway realignment. Below, is a summary table showing the difference in delays between the build and no build scenarios for the PM 2045 Design Year. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report is included in Appendix H – Traffic Impact Analysis. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. Total New Trips Entering Exiting Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic) 279 107 172 Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator) 408 164 244 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic) 519 282 237 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Generator) 608 344 264 Weekday 3790 1895 1895 Intersection 2045 No Build 2045 Build CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St 11.9 17.8 CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 9.2 10.2 CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way 0.5 1.1 CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd 0.8 0.7 CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N 1.5 1.5 Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson 0 2.5 Design Year PM Delay (sec) Page 29 Recommended improvements to the roadway network have been described within the Traffic Impact Analysis Report, including adding sidewalks or shared use paths to development roadways and ensuring the highway easements are planned within the development for future roadway realignment. CSAH 32/Ash Street suggest a need for roadway geometry changes between Monarch Way and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd, and a suggested design speed of 45 MPH. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report is included in Appendix H – Traffic Impact Analysis. 21. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Site preparation work is anticipated to begin as soon as the Spring of 2025. Site construction will take place over the course of phases which may last up to multiple years dependent upon market conditions. Construction activities will include tree removals, site earthwork, utility installation, and the construction of housing units, roads, walks/trails, and stormwater ponds. It is estimated that the project may result in up to approximately 0.7 acres of permanent wetland impacts that will occur as a result of construction of the Project including the ghost plat areas. This includes the following: Wetland impacts were avoided to the extent possible during the preliminary design phase of the overall site plan (Appendix B). The final design will attempt to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the extent possible. Should unavoidable impacts remain, the proper permitting processes will be followed in accordance with the WCA and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as applicable. This process would involve applying for a replacement plan potentially requiring compensatory mitigation. The area of wetland impact and jurisdictional status of the wetlands will be determined by the proper governmental agency during the permitting process following conclusion of the environmental review process. An estimated 2.9 acres of wooded land will be cleared to allow for construction of the Project. A tree preservation plan will be submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for approval prior to commencing construction. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. Reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed Project potentially include adjacent residential developments. The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan projects the city to experience consistent population growth through the year of 2035. The growing population will result in an increased need for housing. Properties adjacent to the Project site are currently zoned for single-family residential use and as a result will likely be looked at as potential sites for development. Due to the lengths of planning and design any adjacent developments likely will not occur during the same timeframe as the construction of the Project. Page 30 c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Following construction, the Project is not anticipated to contribute to any additional environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to contribute to any significant environmental effects due to cumulative effects. In addition to the potential environmental impacts addressed by items 1 to 20, the economic and sociological impacts of the project were considered. The economic and social impacts of the project on the local community are anticipated to be beneficial by bringing additional housing opportunities and property/sales tax income following construction. 22. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 21, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. There are no other known or potential environmental effects that were not discussed in EAW items 1 to 21. Page 31 RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that:  The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.  The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively.  Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix A – GIS Figures Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix B – Site Plan 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 PR O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6 - P L E X 1 1 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. FT . RE T A I L 9,1 0 0 SQ . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = 2.3 ACRES ST O R M W A T E R MA N A G E M E N T P O N D AP P R O X = . 9 A C R E S STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PONDAPPROX = .3 ACRES BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OHLVOHL O H L O H L V OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O R=911.71I=894.95? EX SAN MH I=907.79 I=908.98 EX SB-st R=919.88I=893.60? EX EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX GGV G G UT V UT V UT V FB O FBO G UT V OHL OHL OHL OHL G GG OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L EX SB-st-13 I=901.82 I=901.80 U U G I=914.67UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WE T WET WILKINSON LAKE > > > > > > > > > <II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II <II <II EX SAN MH R=912.07? I=896.35? > I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WET WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T WE T W E T WET WET I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE 2 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 100 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y LOT 3 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:5.2 AC LOT WIDTH:835' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 1 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:12.4 AC LOT WIDTH:1051' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\PUD CONCEPT PLAN\30671 C3-SITE.DWG SAVED BY: SCOTT.KLINKEL PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DEDICATION - INTEGRITY - STEWARDSHIP - COLLABORATION - CREATIVITY 3 DEVOTED AREA TOTAL SITE AREA:75.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USES:56 AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USES:19.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USE BY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TYPE OR USE TYPE (PROPOSED RANGE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING SIZES): TOWNHOUSE:7,480 SF - 11,256 SF APARTMENT / SENIOR LIVING:41,014 SF - 45,895 SF COMMERCIAL:9,100 SF - 10,850 SF AREA DEVOTED TO COMMON OPEN SPACE:0.0 AC AREA DEVOTED TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:49.7 AC AREA DEVOTED TO STREETS:2.2 AC AREA DEVOTED TO COMMERCIAL USES:4.1 AC AREA DEVOTED TO INDUSTRIAL OR OFFICE USES:0.0 AC 32' 32' 2 4 ' 24 ' 18' 2 4 ' 18' 18' 20 ' 26' 24' 2 4 ' 24 ' 24' 24' 24 ' 24' 24' 24'24' 2 4 ' 24' 24' PROJECT PHASES PHASE 1A LOT 1 PHASE 1B LOT 1 PHASE 2 LOTS 4-7 PHASE 3 LOT 3 PHASE 4 LOT 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MN - 08/12/24 60' R.O.W. 60' R.O . W . LOT 2 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION GB : GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOT AREA:4.1 AC LOT WIDTH:682' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 4 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.6 AC LOT WIDTH:151' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 5 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.7 AC LOT WIDTH:208' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 6 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.7 AC LOT WIDTH:208' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 7 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION R-4 : HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT AREA:0.9 AC LOT WIDTH:216' MIN LOT AREA:0.5 AC MIN LOT WIDTH:100' LOT 8 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OPEN SPACE LOT AREA:49.7 AC LOT WIDTH:N / A MIN LOT AREA:N / A MIN LOT WIDTH:N / A WET WET WET W E T W E T W E T WET WET WE T W E T WET W E T W E T WET WET WE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T WE T WE T WE T G G I=895.23 I=895.22 OHL OHL STM STM STM STM OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL W W W W W W W W W W WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WET WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 50 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN34-31-22-43-0012 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST.34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC34-31-22-34-0001 10 0 ' 60' 60 ' 80'65' 130' 60 ' 60' 60 ' 65 ' 80' 130' ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\NORTH OAKS FARMS\30671 NORTH OAKS FARMS CONCEPT 1.DWG SAVED BY: LOGAN.HARMS ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 NORTH OAKS FARMS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/02/24 CONCEPT 1 N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Exhibit A - Site PlanAppendix C – Zoning and Land Use Figure 2-17� 2017 Existing Land Use 2-17 Baldwin Lake RondeauLake BaldEagle Lake WilkinsonLake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake CentervilleLake Marshan Lake GeorgeWatch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake LilacSt 20th Ave S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 20th Ave 20th Ave §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Lake Dr N MainSt Main St Main St CedarSt Hodgson Rd Lake Dr Elm St Birch St Birch St Lake Dr Sunset Ave Rondeau Lake Dr E Ash St Oak Ln Apollo Dr 62nd St N Ash St Rondeau Lake Rd W Centerville Rd Holly Dr 4th Ave Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township City of Blaine City of Circle Pines City of Columbus City of Hugo City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 2-172017 Existing Land Use Legend City of Centerville Agricultural Rural Residential Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial Industrial Utility County Park and Recreation City Park and Recreation Open Space and Conservation Public/Semi-Public Private Airfield Vacant-Commercial Vacant-Industrial Vacant-Residential Vacant-Rural Residential Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 2/6/2018Project Site 3-6 Figure 3-2� 2040 Future Land Use Baldwin Lake RondeauLake Bald EagleLake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake AmeliaLake Reshanau LakeRice Lake CentervilleLake Marshan Lake GeorgeWatchLake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake LilacSt 20th Ave S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 20th Ave 20th Ave §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 MainSt Main St Main St CedarSt Hodgson Rd Lake Dr Elm St Birch St Birch St Lake Dr Sunset Ave Rondeau Lake Dr E Ash St Oak Ln Apollo Dr 62nd St N Ash St Rondeau Lake Rd W Centerville Rd Holly Dr 4th Ave Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St City of Blaine City of Circle Pines City of Columbus City of Hugo City of North OaksCity of Shoreview White Bear Township ´ Figure 3-22040 Future Land Use Legend City of Centerville Permanent Rural Urban Reserve Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Residential / Commercial Office Residential Signature Gateway District Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial Civic and Institutional Parks and Open Space Private Airfield Right-of-Way Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 2/4/201911/9/2020Project Site LacasseCourt CedarStW LacasseCircle KilldeerDrive DelinaCircle PonyCourt GlenCircle AlbertCourt RedHawkTrail VelvetleafLane LamotteDrShadowCourt AquaCir PintoLane ElmcrestAveN FoxCove BehmLane KellySt OakviewCourt MustangCourt ArabianCircle TecklaCourt BlackDuckCourt EvaSt TrappersCourt GrayHeronDrive MuskratRun JosephCourt HighlandCourt WoodDuckTrail CoyoteCourt MallardLane StagecoachTrl TartCourt CarpenterPlace TownCenter Parkway GladstoneCircle PeregrineCircle FloraCourt SiouxLane PalominoLane SouthGlenTrail CassiopeiaCourt LeaCourt CaribouCircle TerraCourt AppaloosaCourt ParkCt OakCourt TeleLane 20thAveS SnowOwlCircle RiceCourt TimberwolfTrailBlackDuckCircle 81stStW PondviewCircle ApolloCt TrappersCrossingS JamesStreet PostRoad SunflowerLane PartridgeCourt LoisLane GordonAvenueN CenturyTrl ShetlandLn PaintedTurtleRoad EgretLane BloomCourt LindaCourt DurangoPoint NorthernLightsBlvd ChokecherryRoad RohavicLane HeatherCourtN SchlavinCourt 4thAve 2ndAvenue AntelopeDrive SheliaAve MourningDoveRoad OakHollowLane KingfisherCourt SherwoodLane GlenviewAvenue BuckthornLane ParkviewDrive DanubeStreet ElmStreet SunriseRoad FoxRoad DianeStreet CherokeeTrail OspreyCourt DeerPassTrail StellaLane RiceLakeCourt BeaverCircle RavensCourt RoyalPinesPlace TomahawkTrail BeaverTrail TotemTrail BarbaraLane 4thAve ArthurCt MerganserCourt LanternLane WhitetailTrail MorganLn CanfieldRoad OakwoodDrive TamarackLane WoodchuckCourt LoisLane PrairieFlowerRoad GreenwoodLane RedBirchCourt WhiteBirchCourt PraireViewPlace LanternCircle HollyDriveN BlackDuckDriveS MeadowCourt OakwoodLane PineSt ElmStreet ElmcrestAveN RedCloverLane IversonCourt SmoketreeLane WildflowerDrive BradleyStreet CenturyTrl FairmontDrive MainSt 74thStreet RuffedGrouseRoad TeleDrive 2ndAvenue BlueHeronDrive AspenLane PalominoLane GladstoneDrive TealCourt GlenviewDrive PeltierLakeDrive HollowLane JonAvenue ConnieLane HighlandTrail NordinSt HudsonTrail LaureneAvenue BirchCourt WareRoad RondeauLakeRdW ForshamLakeDrive BlackDuckDrive WildTurkeyTrail 64thStreet PartridgePlace StellaCircle HollyDriveE WhiteOwlDrive CedarStE ShermanLakeRoad SiouxLookout CoyoteTrail 77thStreetW MarciaLane 65thStreet BlackbirdLane LakotaTrl ChippewaTrail 79thStreetW LacasseDrive MyrtleLane RiverBirchPlace CarlStreet MolitorDr RusticLane CrippleCreekPass AndallStreet MustangLane TrappersXingN WoodsEdgeBlvd FawnLane WareRoad FoxtailCourt HokahDrive HighlandDrive CountryLane ArloLane WoodchuckCircle GlenviewLane LamotteCir GaageLane KellySt OakLane ShadowLakeDriveW WhiteOakRoad LonesomePine Trail ElbeStreetNE SunriseRoad ReilingRoad BluebillLane BaldwinLakeRd SandhillDrive LilacSt TimberwolfTrail GreenBriarDrive SargentCourtN TartLakeRoad MapleSt UlmerDrive HokahDrive LindaAvenue ClearwaterCreekDr MarshanLane FoxtailDrive PheasantRunS 62ndSt HuntersRidge DeerwoodLane OrangeSt KnollDrive 81stStE LindaLane AugustCircle OjibwayPa RedMapleLane AenonPlace FoxRoad TalleLane PheasantHillsDrive EvergreenTrail FoxCircle ArrowheadDrive BaldEagleBoulevard NancyDrive CountyRdJ Villiage Drive 12thAveS AppaloosaLane WhitePineRoad KarthRoad ClearwaterCreekDr DeerwoodLane JeanneDrive 81stStE 77thStreetW OliveSt PattiDrive MarilynDrive LakeviewDrive JaneAve SunriseDrive LindenLane PhelpsRoad NottinghamLane LakeviewDrive WhippoorwillLane HickoryPlace CrystalCourt VickyLane RondeauLakeRdW ThomasStreet OtterLakeDrive HenryLane StallionLane SnowOwlLane 4thAve Woodland Drive PelicanPlace EllenCourt BaldEagleBoulevard CountryLakesDrive WoodridgeLane TimothyCt 2ndAvenue WareRoad MeadowviewTrail CaroleDrive LindaCircle RondeauLake RdE MarketPlaceDrive RedFoxRd RobinsonDr ShermanLakeRoad ShadowLake DriveW StoneybrookDrive PineSt BlackDuckDrive RollingHillsDrive RondeauLakeRdE LangerLane LeonardAvenue RiceLakeLane RiceLakeDrive DianeCourt HollyCourtE ApolloDr ServiceRoad MarvyStreet JoyerLane HawthornRoad RehbeinStreet 77thStreetE ShadowLakeDriveE OakLane OldBirchStreet 62ndStN ElmcrestAveN CountyRd53 4thAve VaughanCourt WoodDuckTrail ShadowLakeDriveW HollyDriveN 4thAve HollyDriveE AquaLn MeadowviewCourt MeadowlarkCourt GoldenrodCircle Woodridge Court SunfishCourt QuarterHorseCourt BrokenOakCourt ClydesdaleCircle WolfCircle GreySquirrelRoad SandpiperDrive CrippleCreekCourt SedgeCourt RuffedGrouseCourt Tomahawk C o u r t Timberwolf Circle ShadowLakeCourtE WhitetailRidge MineralPoint CountyRdJ DeerwoodCircle HighlandCircle KilldeerCourt HartfordCircle LangerCircle ClearwaterCreekCircl ArrowheadCourt IronwoodCircle 20thAveN AshStW 80thStE SunsetAve MainSt 20thAveS GoiffonRd SunsetAve MainSt LakeDrNE CentervilleRd LilacSt MainSt LilacSt BirchSt NorthRd 20thAveS AshSt AshSt Ho dgson Rd BirchSt HodgsonRd ApolloDr LakeDrNE LakeDr CentervilleRd 20thAveN ApolloDr LakeDr CountyRdJ SunsetAve Birch St OtterLakeDrive Otter Lake Drive MainSt AshSt MainSt BirchSt Sno w G o o s e T r a i l Marshan Ct Sav. Ct RICE C R E E K C H A I N O F L A K E S R E G I O N A L P A R K R E S E R V E Cit y o f Ce n t e r v i l l e RONDEAU LAKE (2-15)FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.6 OTTER LAKE (2-3)OHWL 911.5FIRM BFE 913FIS BFE 912.7 BALD EAGLE LAKE (62-2)OHWL 911.0FIRM BFE 913FIS BFE 912.5 AMELIA LAKE (2-14)OHWL 908.1FIRM BFE 910FIS BFE 910.2 BALDWIN LAKE (2-13) OHWL 883.1FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 RESHANAU LAKE (2-9) OHWL 883.5FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 RICE LAKE (2-8)OHWL 883.1FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 CENTERVILLE LAKE (2-6)OHWL 885.0FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.9 MARSHAN LAKE (2-7)OHWL 883.3FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 PELTIER LAKE (2-4)OHWL 884.7FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.7 WARDS LAKE (2-10) OHWL 883.7 CEDAR LAKE (2-12) OHWL 892.9 WILKINSON LAKE (62-43) OHWL 895.2 SHERMAN LAKE (2-11) GEORGE WATCH LAKE (2-5) UNNAMED (2-1) Ord. 11-95 Ord. 22-97 Ord.08-95 Ord. 17-03 Ord.04-04 Ord. 09-88 Ord.12-03 Ord. 93-10 Ord.08-90 Ord. 94-14 Ord.08-02 Ord. 01-14 Ord.12-04 Ord. 07-16 Ord. 92-15 Ord. 04-16 Ord. 05-18 Ord. 08-99 Ord. 12-18 Ord. 20-03 Ord.14-99 Ord.09-99 Ord. 06-14 Ord. 06-91 Ord. 02-14 Ord. 16-01 Ord. 03-05 Ord. 05-03Ord.26-04 Ord. 03-00 Ord.06-18 PSP PSP PSP PSP PSP GI LI LI GB GB GB R-6 R-4 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-2 R-1X R-1X R-1X R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-X R-X R R R R R R R R PSPOrd. 12-99 456721 456749 456754 456723 456749 456714 456754 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 ")53 ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 §¨¦35E §¨¦35W 6300 6400 6600 6500 7100 6700 8400 8300 6800 8200 8100 6900 7600 7700 7500 7300 7800 7400 7900 7000 7200 8000 6100 6700 7100 6300 6500 8400 6600 8300 8200 6200 6900 7800 6000 6800 6400 8100 7600 7700 7500 7300 7400 7900 7000 7200 8000 90 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 0 0 16 0 0 70 0 11 0 0 40 0 10 0 0 60 0 50 0 80 0 17 0 0 18 0 0 19 0 0 20 0 030 0 21 0 0 20 0 0 22 0 0 10 0 23 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 22 0 0 21 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 0 16 0 0 14 0 0 12 0 0 10 0 0 80 0 60 0 40 0 30 0 20 0 10 0 0 23 0 0 20 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 90 0 70 0 50 0 Zoning Map of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Community Development 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Phone (651) 982-2400 City of Shoreview City of North Oaks White Bear Township City of Columbus Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f H u g o : Legend ZONING R Rural R-X Rural Executive R-1 Single Family Residential R-1X Single Family Executive R-2 Two Family Residential R-3 Medium Density Residential R-4 High Density Residential R-5 High Density Residential and Business R-6 Manufactured Home Park NB Neighborhood Business LB Limited Business GB General Business LI Light Industrial GI General Industrial BC Business Campus PSP Public Semi-Public PUD Planned Unit Development Maps are for illustrative purposes only. Recent changes may not be included. Land Use and Zoning Information should be verified with City Staff. 0 2,000 4,0001,000 DRAWING SCALE IN FEET Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s Updated Through Ord. No. 08-22 Effective January 5, 2023 Coordinate System: Anoka County NAD83 Feet Lambert Conformal Conic od d ev e n odd even HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM Anoka County Parcel Data: April 2023 Release Project Site Project Area Project Area Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix D – Geotechnical Report Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development Southwest of County Road J and Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota Prepared for North Oaks Company LLC Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. John T. Carlson, PE Senior Engineer License Number: 20633 August 22, 2024 Project B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com August 22, 2024 Project B2402335 Ms. Lauren Grouws North Oaks Company LLC 5959 Centerville Road, Suite 200 North Oaks, MN 55127 Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development Southwest of County Road J and Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Ms. Grouws: We are pleased to present this Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the proposed Wilkinson Waters development located in the southwest quadrant of County Road J and Centerville Road in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Please see the attached report for a detailed discussion on the field exploration results and our recommendations. The report should be read in its entirety. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please contact John Carlson at 952.540.7248 (johcarlson@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION John T. Carlson, PE Senior Engineer Henry Vloo, PE Senior Engineer c: Mr. Joseph Westphal, Braun Intertec Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Site Conditions and History ................................................................................................. 3 A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 4 A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 4 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 4 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 5 B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 5 B.2. Boring Results ...................................................................................................................... 5 B.3. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 6 B.4. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 7 C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 8 C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................... 8 C.1.a. Building Subgrade Preparation .............................................................................. 8 C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils ............................................................................................. 8 C.1.c. Effects of Groundwater .......................................................................................... 8 C.1.d. Additional Evaluation ............................................................................................. 9 C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation .............................................................................. 9 C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations ............................................................................... 9 C.2.b. Excavation Oversizing ........................................................................................... 10 C.2.c. Excavated Slopes .................................................................................................. 11 C.2.d. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 12 C.2.e. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction .......................................................... 12 C.2.f. Special Inspections of Soils ................................................................................... 13 C.3. Spread Footings ................................................................................................................. 14 C.4. Below-Grade Walls ............................................................................................................ 14 C.4.a. Drainage Control .................................................................................................. 15 C.4.b. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads............................................................... 16 C.5. Interior Slabs ..................................................................................................................... 17 C.5.a. Moisture Vapor Protection .................................................................................. 17 C.5.b. Radon ................................................................................................................... 17 C.6. Frost Protection ................................................................................................................. 17 C.6.a. Frost Heave Mitigation ......................................................................................... 17 C.7. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 19 C.7.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation ......................................................................... 19 C.7.b. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .............................................................................. 19 C.7.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 20 C.7.d. Bituminous Pavement Materials .......................................................................... 20 C.7.e. Concrete Flatwork ................................................................................................ 20 C.7.f. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 20 C.7.g. Performance and Maintenance ........................................................................... 21 C.8. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 21 C.8.a. Subgrade Stabilization .......................................................................................... 21 C.8.b. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 22 C.9. Stormwater........................................................................................................................ 22 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page C.10. Additional Considerations ................................................................................................. 23 C.10.a. Below Grade Pool ................................................................................................. 23 C.10.b. Equipment Support .............................................................................................. 23 C.10.c. Additional Soil Borings and Piezometers ............................................................. 23 D. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 23 D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 23 D.2. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 24 D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 24 D.2.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 24 D.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 24 D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 24 D.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 24 D.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 25 E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 25 E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 25 E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 25 E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 25 E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 25 E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 25 E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 26 E.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 26 E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 26 Appendix Soil Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets ST-3 through ST-16 Descriptive Terminology of Soil A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the design and construction of the proposed Wilkinson Waters development located in the southwest quadrant of County Road J and Centerville Road in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The Wilkinson Waters development is in the design phase and grading or building plans with proposed floor grades and building foundation loads is not yet available. The project will include the construction of 2 apartment buildings, 1 senior living building, 3 retail buildings, and 11 townhouse buildings, with associated underground utilities, stormwater management, and bituminous drive lanes and parking lots. Tables 1 through 4 provide a summary of project details. The attached Table 1. Apartment and Senior Living Buildings Description Aspect Source Description Below grade levels Assumed 1 Above grade levels Assumed 3 Finished floor elevation Assumed 930 feet Lower-level floor elevation Assumed 920 feet Maximum Column loads Assumed 300 kips Wall loads Assumed 6 to 8 kips/ft Nature of construction Assumed The buildings will be constructed with precast planks and wood framing with typical cast-in-place concrete footings and bearing walls. Site Grading Assumed We anticipate that general exterior site grades will be raised about 5 to 10 feet during grading. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 2 Table 2. Retail Buildings Description Aspect Source Description Below grade levels Assumed 0 (Slab-on-Grade) Above grade levels Assumed 1 Finished floor elevation Assumed 930 feet Maximum Column loads Assumed 100 kips Wall loads Assumed 2 to 4 kips/ft Nature of construction Assumed The buildings will be slab-on-grade, constructed with wood framing, with cast-in-place concrete footings and bearing walls. Site Grading Assumed We anticipate that general exterior site grades will be raised about 5 to 10 feet during grading. Table 3. Townhouse Buildings Description Aspect Source Description Below grade levels Assumed 0 (Slab-on-Grade) Above grade levels Assumed 2 Finished floor elevation Assumed 930 feet Maximum Column loads Assumed 50 kips Wall loads Assumed 1 to 2 kips/ft Nature of construction Assumed The buildings will be slab-on-grade and constructed with wood framing with typical cast-in-place concrete footings and bearing walls. Site Grading Assumed We anticipate that general exterior site grades will be raised about 5 to 10 feet during grading. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 3 Table 4. Site Aspects and Grading Description Aspect Description Pavement type Bituminous drive lanes and parking lots with exterior concrete flatwork Pavement loads Light Duty = 50,000 ESALs (assumed)* Heavy Duty = 200,000 ESALs (assumed)* Stormwater management 4 stormwater ponds with 2 in the west, 1 in the north and 1 in the south Retail area. *Equivalent 18,000-lb single axle loads based on 20-year design. The proposed site layout is shown on the attached Soil Boring Location Sketch. A.2. Site Conditions and History Currently, the site exists as cultivated fields or wetlands with some brush and trees around the margins of the site. The west portion of the site is a wetland associated with Wilkinson Lake. Based on the boring locations, current site grades range from about 904 to 929 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and generally slopes down to the west to the wetland area. The following recent aerial Photograph 1 shows the current site conditions. Photograph 1. Aerial Photograph of the Site Photograph obtained from Google Maps. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 4 A.3. Purpose The purpose of our preliminary geotechnical evaluation is to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of proposed Wilkinson Waters development. A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents We reviewed the following information:  Concept plan 5 dated June 12, 2024, prepared by ISG.  Aerial photographs of the project area using Google Earth®.  The Surficial Geology Map for Anoka County prepared by the University of Minnesota. The map is denoted as Atlas C-27, Plate 3, Surficial Geology, and is dated 2010. We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations. A.5. Scope of Services We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal QTB192060 dated March 18, 2024. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services.  Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited.  Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. We selected and staked the new exploration locations. We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS technology using the State of Minnesota’s permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 5  Performing 16 standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 to ST-16, to nominal depths of 14 1/2 to 21 feet below grade across the site. Borings ST-1 and ST-2 were not drilled due to soft ground conditions.  Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis.  Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, and preliminary recommendations for structure and pavement subgrade preparation and the design of foundations, floor slabs, exterior slabs, utilities, stormwater improvements and pavements. B. Results B.1. Geologic Overview We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic history for the site. B.2. Boring Results Table 5 provides a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in Table 5. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 6 Table 5. Subsurface Profile Summary* Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration Resistances Commentary and Details Topsoil SM, ML N/A  Encountered at the surface of all 14 boring locations and consisted of silty sand and sandy silt.  Thicknesses at boring locations about 1/2 to 1 1/2 feet.  Brown to dark brown in color.  Moisture condition generally moist. Alluvium SP-SM, SM, CL, CH 2 to 15 blows per foot (BPF)  Encountered below the topsoil in most of the borings.  Alluvium varied and extended to depths from about 7 to greater than 14 1/2 feet below grade.  Mostly silty sand and sand with lesser amounts of lean clay and fat clay.  Brown, dark brown, and gray in color.  Moisture condition generally moist to wet. Glacial Till CL, SC, SM, SP-SM 4 to 17 BPF  Encounter below the topsoil and/or alluvium at Borings ST-5, ST-7, ST-9, ST-10 through ST-12, ST-15, and ST-16.  Generally clayey sand and sandy lean clay with lesser amounts of sand and silty sand.  Brown and gray in color.  Moisture condition generally moist to wet. *Abbreviations defined in the attached Descriptive Terminology sheet. B.3. Groundwater Table 6 summarizes the depths where we observed groundwater; the attached Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix also include this information and additional details. Table 6. Groundwater Summary Location Measured Surface Elevation (feet) Measured Depth to Groundwater (feet) Corresponding Groundwater Elevation (feet) ST-3 905.4 9 896 1/2 ST-4 917.5 6 911 1/2 ST-5 905.8 9 1/2 895 1/2 ST-6 915.2 7 908 ST-7 920.9 2 919 ST-8 923.8 5 918 1/2 ST-9 903.9 9 895 North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 7 Location Measured Surface Elevation (feet) Measured Depth to Groundwater (feet) Corresponding Groundwater Elevation (feet) ST-10 924.1 5 919 ST-11 923.8 5 918 1/2 ST-12 924.1 5 919 ST-13 904.1 8 1/2 895 1/2 ST-14 917.7 7 1/2 910 ST-15 925.3 7 918 ST-16 929.6 Not Observed ---- At Borings ST-3, ST-5, ST-9, and ST-13 performed in the west portion of the site adjacent to the wetland, groundwater was encountered between depths of about 8 to 9 feet, which correspond to elevations of about 895 to 896 feet. At Borings ST-4, ST-6 through ST-8, ST-10 through ST-12, ST-14 and ST-15 performed in the central and east portions of the site, groundwater was encountered between depths of about 2 to 7 feet, which correspond to elevations of about 908 to 919 feet. The site is situated between Wilkinson Lake (OHW 895.2 feet) and Amelia Lake (OHW 908.1 feet). The ordinary high water (OHW) levels were obtained from the MN DNR Lake Finder website. Based on the results of the borings, it is our opinion that some of the groundwater encountered in the borings in the higher portion of the site is perched groundwater within granular alluvial soil layers overlying less permeable clayey glacial till soils. We anticipate that seams or zones of perched water will be present at variable elevations across the site and should be expected during construction. Because the apartment and senior buildings will likely have below grade parking as well as an in-ground pool, we recommend that additional soil borings be completed in which we can install piezometers. The piezometers can measure groundwater levels over an extended period of time to assist in establishing low floor grades. Project planning should expect groundwater will fluctuate seasonally and annually. B.4. Laboratory Test Results We performed mechanical analyses through a #200 sieve (P200) and moisture content tests in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures on samples recovered North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 8 from the SPT borings. The P200 and moisture content tests are shown on the Log of Boring Sheets included in the Appendix, across from the associated soil sample. C. Recommendations C.1. Design and Construction Discussion C.1.a. Building Subgrade Preparation The preliminary plans indicate the proposed development will contain 2 apartment buildings and 1 senior living building that will all contain below grade parking levels, 3 slab-on-grade retail buildings and 11 slab-on-grade townhouse buildings. Based on the results of the borings and the anticipated finished floor elevation of 930 feet for the buildings, we anticipate a soil correction will be required for the buildings with fills up to about 10 feet required to establish grade. We anticipate the soil correction will involve removing the topsoil, existing fill and soft/very loose soils. Also, any relic buried structures – such as old pavements, wells, cisterns, utility lines, floor slabs or foundations, etc., should be removed from building pads and paved areas. Any areas of loose or disturbed sands in the excavation bottoms should be moisture conditioned, if necessary, and surface compacted to increase the density and uniformity of the sands prior to footing or fill placement. C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils The on-site native soils, free of organic materials and debris, appear suitable for reuse as engineered fill. Some of the on-site soils will likely require moisture conditioning (drying or wetting) prior to reuse and compaction. However, the higher moisture content lean clay and the fat clay should not be used as structural fill. Any materials to be used as engineered fill should be tested and approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement. C.1.c. Effects of Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in 13 of the 14 soil borings during drilling. At the 4 borings performed in the west portion of the site adjacent to the wetland, groundwater was encountered between depths of about 8 to 9 feet, which correspond to elevations of about 895 to 896 feet. At 9 of the 10 borings performed in the central and east portions of the site, groundwater was encountered between depths of North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 9 about 2 to 7 feet, which correspond to elevations of about 908 to 919 feet. The attached Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix also include this information and additional details. The groundwater levels were highly variable; therefore, it is our opinion that some of the groundwater observed in the borings is perched in permeable sand layers overlying slower draining clay layers. Excavation trenches for utility installation will likely intercept some of these permeable layers creating difficult backfilling conditions. Once the site grading and utility construction is complete, we expect some of the perched water conditions of the site may change. The contractor should immediately remove any collected water within the excavations to facilitate construction and proper backfilling. Project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays and silts. Dewatering of high-permeability soils (e.g., sands) from within the excavation with conventional pumps has the potential to loosen the soils, due to upward flow, and we recommend that well points or dewatering wells be used in these areas. To further evaluate the groundwater conditions on this site, additional soil borings should be completed and piezometers should be installed and monitored. This additional groundwater data would assist in establishing the below grade parking levels of the apartment and senior living buildings. It will also assist with designing the below-grade pool. C.1.d. Additional Evaluation This draft report assumes that the buildings will be supported by spread footing foundations designed for a maximum net allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). As design of the development progresses and the building floor grades and building loads are established, we recommend completing additional soil borings to determine if a higher soil bearing pressure is feasible. C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations We recommend soil corrections to remove any unsuitable materials from the building footprint and oversize area prior to construction. We define unsuitable materials as any existing fill, frozen materials, topsoil, organic soils, existing utilities, building debris, pavements, and/or soft or very loose soils. Table 7 shows the anticipated soil correction excavation depths and associated bottom elevations for each of the borings. We have assumed that structures will be constructed at each boring location. If structures are not planned at individual boring locations, the depth of soil correction work could be reduced. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 10 Table 7. Anticipated Soil Correction Excavation Depths Location Measured Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet) Anticipated Excavation Bottom Elevation (feet) ST-3 905.4 1** 904 1/2 ST-4 917.5 1/2 917 ST-5 905.8 9 897 ST-6 915.2 1/2 914 1/2 ST-7 920.9 1 1/2 919 1/2 ST-8 923.8 1/2 923 ST-9 903.9 1 903 ST-10 924.1 1 923 ST-11 923.8 1 923 ST-12 924.1 1 923 ST-13 904.1 1 903 ST-14 917.7 1 916 1/2 ST-15 925.3 1 924 1/2 ST-16 929.6 1 928 1/2 ** - Recommend moisture conditioning and surface compacting upper looser sands. Note - Borings ST-1 and ST-2 not drilled. Excavation depths will vary between and away from the borings. Portions of the excavations may also extend deeper than indicated by the borings. A geotechnical representative should observe the excavations to make the necessary field judgments regarding the suitability of the exposed soils and to evaluate for additional subcuts are warranted. The contractor should use equipment and techniques to minimize soil disturbance. Loose or disturbed sands should be moisture conditioned, if necessary, and surface compacted to increase their density and uniformity prior to engineered fill and/or concrete placement. C.2.b. Excavation Oversizing When removing unsuitable materials below structures or pavements, we recommend the excavation extend outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. See Figure 1 for an illustration of excavation oversizing. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 11 Figure 1. Generalized Illustration of Oversizing The design team should evaluate that adequate oversizing of soil corrections can be achieved. Additional consideration of this adjacent to the existing building is provided in Section C.4. If adequate oversizing cannot be achieved, we should be consulted as additional recommendations may apply. C.2.c. Excavated Slopes Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations will generally consist of sands and silty sands. These soils are typically considered as Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1 1/2H:1V. 1. Engineered fill as defined in C.2.e. 2. Excavation oversizing minimum of 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope or flatter. 3. Engineered fill as required to meet pavement support or landscaping requirements as defined in C.2.e. 4. Excavation Backslope to OSHA requirements. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 12 An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements. C.2.d. Excavation Dewatering We recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays and silts. Dewatering of high- permeability soils (e.g., sands) from within the excavation with conventional pumps has the potential to loosen the soils, due to upward flow, and we recommend that well points or dewatering wells be used in these areas. C.2.e. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction Table 8 below contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials. Table 8. Engineered Fill Materials* Locations To Be Used Engineered Fill Classification Possible Soil Type Descriptions Gradation Additional Requirements  Below foundations  Below interior slabs Structural fill SP-SM, SM, SC 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 25% passing #200 sieve < 2% Organic Content (OC) Plasticity Index (PI) <20% Any structural fill greater than 8 feet (from slab grade) Deep Structural fills SP, SP-SM 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 12% passing #200 sieve < 2% OC  Drainage layer  Non-frost- susceptible  Free-draining  Non-frost- susceptible fill SP 100% passing 1-inch sieve < 50% passing #40 sieve < 5% passing #200 sieve < 2% OC Behind below- grade walls, beyond drainage layer Retained fill SP-SM, SM, SC 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 2% OC Plasticity Index (PI) < 4% Pavements Pavement fill SP-SM, SM, SC, CL 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 2% OC PI < 20% Below landscaped surfaces, where subsidence is not a concern Non-structural fill SP-SM, SM, SC, CL, OL 100% passing 6-inch sieve < 10% OC *More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve may be needed to accommodate work occurring in periods of wet or freezing weather. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 13 We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 to 12 inches thick. We recommend compacting each lift of engineered fill with a full size, vibrating, sheepsfoot compactor, or similar in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 9. The project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure. Table 9. Compaction Recommendations Summary Reference Relative Compaction, percent (ASTM D698 – Standard Proctor) Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percentage points < 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically SP, SP-SM) > 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically CL, SC, SM) Below bulding pads, less than 10 feet of fill 98 ±3 -1 to +3 Below bulding pads, more than 10 feet of fill 100 ±2 -1 to +2 Within 3 feet of pavement subgrade 100 ±2 -2 to +1 More than 3 feet below pavement subgrade 95 ±3 -1 to +3 Below landscaped surfaces 90 ±5 -1 to +5 The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations during construction. We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively compacting the soil and meeting project requirements. C.2.f. Special Inspections of Soils We recommend including the site grading and placement of engineered fill within the building pad under the requirements of Special Inspections, as provided in Chapter 17 of the International Building Code, which is part of the Minnesota State Building Code. Special Inspection requires observation of soil conditions below engineered fill or footings, evaluations to determine if excavations extend to the anticipated soils, and if engineered fill materials meet requirements for type of engineered fill and compaction condition of engineered fill. A licensed geotechnical engineer should direct the Special Inspections of site grading and engineered fill placement. The purpose of these Special Inspections is to evaluate whether the work is in accordance with the approved Geotechnical Report for the project. Special Inspections should include evaluation of the subgrade, observing preparation of the subgrade North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 14 (surface compaction or dewatering, excavation oversizing, placement procedures and materials used for engineered fill, etc.) and compaction testing of the engineered fill. C.3. Spread Footings Table 10 below contains our recommended parameters for foundation design. Table 10. Recommended Spread Footing Design Parameters Item Description Maximum net allowable bearing pressure (psf) 3,000 Minimum factor of safety for bearing capacity failure 3.0 Minimum width (inches) Strip footing – 24 Column footing – 36 Minimum embedment below final exterior grade for heated structures (inches) 42 Minimum embedment below final exterior grade for unheated structures or for footings not protected from freezing temperatures during construction (inches) 60 Total estimated settlement (inches) Less than 1 inch Differential settlement Typically, about 2/3 of total settlement C.4. Below-Grade Walls Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the surrounding soils transmitted to them. Designs should also consider the slope of any fill and dead or live loads, including equipment and materials, placed within a horizontal distance behind the walls that is equal to the height of the walls. Our recommended values also assume the wall design provides drainage to prevent water from accumulating behind the walls. The construction documents should clearly identify the material properties of the soil the contractor should use for wall fill. The project documents should indicate if walls need bracing prior to filling and allowable unbalanced fill heights. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 15 C.4.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing drain tile to remove water behind the below-grade walls, at the location shown in Figure 2. The below-grade wall drainage system should also incorporate free-draining, engineered fill or a drainage board placed against the wall and connected to the drain tile. Even with the use of free-draining, engineered fill, we recommend general waterproofing of below-grade walls that surround occupied or potentially occupied areas because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. Figure 2. Generalized Illustration of Wall Engineered Fill The materials listed in the sketch should meet the definitions in Section C.2.e. Low-permeability material is capable of directing water away from the wall, like clay, topsoil or pavement. The project documents should indicate if the contractor should brace the walls prior to filling and allowable unbalanced fill heights. 1. 2-foot wide area of Free- Draining Engineered Fill or Drainage Board. 2. Retained Engineered Fill. 3. 1-foot of Low-Permeability Soil or Pavement. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 16 As shown in Figure 3, we recommend Zone 2 consist of retained engineered fill, and this material will control lateral pressures on the wall. C.4.b. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads Below-grade wall design can use active earth pressure conditions, if the walls can rotate slightly. If the wall design cannot tolerate rotation, then design should use at-rest earth pressure conditions. Rotation up to 0.002 times the wall height is generally required for walls supporting sand. Rotation up to 0.02 times the wall height is required when wall supports clay. Table 11 presents our recommended lateral coefficients and equivalent fluid pressures for wall design of active, at-rest and passive earth pressure conditions. The table also provides recommended wet unit weights and internal friction angles. Designs should also consider the slope of any engineered fill and dead or live loads placed behind the walls within a horizontal distance that is equal to the height of the walls. Our recommended values assume the wall design provides drainage so water cannot accumulate behind the walls. The construction documents should clearly identify what soils the contractor should use for engineered fill of walls. Table 11. Recommended Below-Grade Wall Design Parameters – Drained Conditions Retained Soil Wet Unit Weight (pcf) Friction Angle (degrees) Active Equivalent Fluid Pressure (pcf) At-Rest Equivalent Fluid Pressure (pcf) Passive Equivalent Fluid Pressure* (pcf) Clayey soil (CL, SC) 125 26 50 70 320 Silty Sand (SM) 130 30 42 62 390 Sand (SP, SP-SM) 120 34 35 55 N/A *Based on Rankine model for soils in a region behind the wall extending at least 2 horizontal feet beyond the bottom outer edges of the wall footings and then rising up and away from the wall at an angle no steeper than 60 degrees from horizontal. Sliding resistance between the bottom of the footing and the soil can also resist lateral pressures. We recommend assuming a sliding coefficient equal to 0.3 between the concrete and on site soil. The values presented in this section are un-factored. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 17 C.5. Interior Slabs C.5.a. Moisture Vapor Protection Excess transmission of water vapor could cause floor dampness, certain types of floor bonding agents to separate, or mold to form under floor coverings. If project planning includes using floor coverings or coatings, we recommend placing a vapor retarder or vapor barrier immediately beneath the slab. We also recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. C.5.b. Radon We recommend installing a radon mitigation system in accordance with local building code. Our certified and licensed radon mitigation professionals can assist in this design, at your request. C.6. Frost Protection A mixture of clay, silty sand, and sand will underlie exterior slabs (i.e., sidewalks, stoops, etc.). We consider the clay and silty sands to be moderately to highly frost susceptible. Soils of this type can retain moisture and heave upon freezing. In general, this characteristic is not an issue unless these soils become saturated, due to surface runoff or infiltration, or are excessively wet in situ. Once frozen, unfavorable amounts of general and isolated heaving of the soils and the surface structures supported on them could develop. This type of heaving could affect design drainage patterns and the performance of exterior slabs and pavements, as well as any isolated exterior footings and piers. Note that general runoff and infiltration from precipitation are not the only sources of water that can saturate subgrade soils and contribute to frost heave. Roof drainage and irrigation of landscaped areas in close proximity to exterior slabs, pavements, and isolated footings and piers, contribute as well. C.6.a. Frost Heave Mitigation To address most of the heave related issues, we recommend setting general site grades and grades for exterior surface features to direct surface drainage away from buildings, across large, paved areas and away from walkways. Such grading will limit the potential for saturation of the subgrade and subsequent heaving. General grades should also have enough “slope” to tolerate potential larger areas of heave, which may not fully settle after thawing. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 18 Even small amounts of frost-related differential movement at walkway joints or cracks can create tripping hazards. Project planning can explore several subgrade improvement options to address this condition. One of the more conservative subgrade improvement options to mitigate potential heave is removing any frost-susceptible soils present below the exterior slab areas down to a minimum depth of 4 feet below subgrade elevations or to the bottom of adjacent footing grades. We recommend filling the resulting excavation with non-frost-susceptible fill (i.e., clean sand). We also recommend sloping the bottom of the excavation toward one or more collection points to remove any water entering the engineered fill. This approach will not be effective in controlling frost heave without removing the water. An important geometric aspect of the excavation and replacement approach described above is sloping the banks of the excavations to create a more gradual transition between the unexcavated soils considered frost susceptible and the engineered fill in the excavated area, which is not frost susceptible. The slope allows attenuation of differential movement that may occur along the excavation boundary. We recommend slopes that are 3H:1V, or flatter, along transitions between frost-susceptible and non- frost-susceptible soils. Figure 3 shows an illustration summarizing some of the recommendations. Figure 3. Frost Protection Geometry Illustration Another option is to limit frost heave in critical areas, such as doorways and entrances, via frost-depth footings or localized excavations with sloped transitions between frost-susceptible and non-frost- susceptible soils, as described above. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 19 Over the life of slabs, cracks will develop and joints open, which will expose the subgrade and allow water to enter from the surface and either saturate or perch atop the subgrade soils. This water intrusion increases the potential for frost heave or moisture-related distress near the crack or joint. Therefore, we recommend implementing a detailed maintenance program to seal and/or fill any cracks and joints. The maintenance program should give special attention to areas where dissimilar materials abut one another, where construction joints occur and where shrinkage cracks develop. C.7. Pavements C.7.a. Pavement Subgrade Preparation We recommend the following steps for pavement and exterior slab subgrade preparation. Note that project planning may need to require additional subcuts to limit frost heave. 1. Strip unsuitable soils consisting of topsoil, organic soils, and vegetation from the area, within the proposed pavement subgrade area. 2. Have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional subgrade improvements are necessary. 3. Slope subgrade soils to allow the removal of accumulating water. 4. Scarify, moisture condition, and surface compact the subgrade with at least five passes of a large roller with a minimum drum diameter of 3 1/2 feet. 5. Place pavement engineered fill to grade and compact in accordance with Section C.2.e. to bottom of pavement section. See Section C.6 for additional considerations related to frost heave. 6. Proofroll the pavement subgrade as described in Section C.7.b. C.7.b. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work to support pavements. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 20 The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting during the proofroll, as determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and re-compaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, chemical stabilization and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement. C.7.c. Design Sections Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils to determine an R-value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar silty sand soils anticipated at the pavement subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an R-value of 30. Note the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve this value. Table 12 provides recommended pavement sections, based on the soils support and traffic loads. Table 12. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Sections Use Light Duty Heavy Duty Minimum asphalt thickness (inches) 3 1/2 4 Minimum aggregate base thickness (inches) 8 12 C.7.d. Bituminous Pavement Materials Appropriate mix designs are critical to the performance of flexible pavements. We can provide recommendations for pavement material selection during final pavement design. C.7.e. Concrete Flatwork Subgrade preparation for concrete flatwork (aprons, dumpster pads, etc.) should be consistent with those recommendations provided for exterior slabs and bituminous pavements. We anticipate traffic loads on sidewalks will be limited to primarily pedestrian foot traffic. Given the assumed subgrade parameters and loading conditions, we recommend design of concrete flatwork include a minimum 5-inch concrete section over 6 inches of aggregate base. C.7.f. Subgrade Drainage Given the abundance of native silty sands at or near pavement subgrades, we recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch basins, and behind curb in landscaped areas. We also recommend installing drainpipes along pavement and exterior slab edges North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 21 where exterior grades promote drainage toward those edge areas. The contractor should place drainpipes in small trenches, extended at least 8 inches below the aggregate base material. C.7.g. Performance and Maintenance We based the above pavement designs on a 20-year performance life for bituminous. This is the amount of time before we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance life assumes routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to support construction traffic. Many conditions affect the overall performance of the exterior slabs and pavements. Some of these conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. C.8. Utilities C.8.a. Subgrade Stabilization Earthwork activities associated with utility installations located inside the building area should adhere to the recommendations in Section C.2.e. For exterior utilities, we anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However, if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils or perched water at invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with sand or crushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction should not place utilities within the 1H:1V oversizing of foundations. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 22 C.8.b. Corrosion Potential Based on our experience, the sandy soils encountered by the borings are moderately corrosive to metallic conduits, but only marginally corrosive to concrete. We recommend specifying non-corrosive materials or providing corrosion protection, unless project planning chooses to perform additional tests to demonstrate the soils are not corrosive. C.9. Stormwater Based on laboratory tests run on selected samples from the borings we estimated infiltration rates for the soils we encountered, as listed in Table 13. These estimated infiltration rates represent the long-term infiltration capacity of a practice and not the capacity of the soils in their natural state. Field testing, such as with a double-ring infiltrometer (ASTM D3385), may justify the use of higher infiltration rates. However, we recommend adjusting field test rates by the appropriate correction factor, as provided for in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or as allowed by the local watershed. We recommend consulting the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for stormwater design. Table 13. Soil Infiltration Rates Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group Infiltration Rate * (inches/hour) Sands (SP-SM) A 0.8 Silts, very fine sands, silty or clayey fine sands (ML, SM, SC) C 0.2 Sandy clay, silty clay, lean clay, fat clay (CLS, CL-ML, CL, CH) D 0.06 *From Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Rates may differ at individual sites. Fine-grained soils (clays and silts), topsoil, or organic matter that mixes into or washes onto the soil will lower the permeability. The contractor should maintain and protect infiltration areas during construction. Furthermore, organic matter and silt washed into the system after construction can fill the soil pores and reduce permeability over time. Proper maintenance is important for long-term performance of infiltration systems. This geotechnical evaluation does not constitute a review of site suitability for stormwater infiltration or evaluate the potential impacts, if any, from infiltration of large amounts of stormwater. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 23 C.10. Additional Considerations C.10.a. Below Grade Pool Because of the potential for higher perched groundwater on this site, it may be necessary to design the below grade pool to resist buoyancy that could be caused by groundwater, especially if the bottom of the pool is less than 3 feet from groundwater. C.10.b. Equipment Support The recommendations included in the report may not be applicable to equipment used for the construction and maintenance of this project. We recommend evaluating subgrade conditions in areas of shoring, scaffolding, cranes, pumps, lifts and other construction equipment prior to mobilization to determine if the exposed materials are suitable for equipment support or require some form of subgrade improvement. We also recommend project planning consider the effect that loads applied by such equipment may have on structures they bear on or surcharge – including pavements, buried utilities, below-grade walls, etc. We can assist you in this evaluation. C.10.c. Additional Soil Borings and Piezometers When the final site concept plan has been established, we recommend additional soil borings to further define the site soil conditions. Piezometers could then be installed in several of the additional soil borings to further define the site groundwater conditions. D. Procedures D.1. Penetration Test Borings We drilled the penetration test borings between March 25 and April 15, 2024, with an all-terrain- mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151, taking penetration test samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. We sealed penetration test boreholes meeting the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Environmental Borehole criteria in general accordance with MDH procedures. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 24 D.2. Exploration Logs D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the penetrated geologic materials and present the results of penetration resistance and other in-situ tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples and groundwater measurements. We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. D.2.b. Geologic Origins We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance in-situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. D.3. Material Classification and Testing D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used. D.3.b. Laboratory Testing The exploration logs in the Appendix note the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM procedures. North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 25 D.4. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes, as noted on the boring logs. E. Qualifications E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions E.1.a. Material Strata We developed our preliminary evaluation, analyses, and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation and thickness, away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until performing additional exploration work or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them. E.1.b. Groundwater Levels We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility E.2.a. Plan Review We based this preliminary report on a limited amount of information, and we made several assumptions to help us develop our preliminary recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical North Oaks Company LLC Project B2402335 August 22, 2024 Page 26 aspects of the designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations. E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing We recommend retaining Braun Intertec to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of- record responsibilities. E.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. E.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Appendix ELEC KINSON LAKE > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I > > > <II <II<II<II <II<II<II >> > > >>>>>> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE I I I WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET W E T WE T W E T WE T GG G UTV UT V UTV UTV UTV UT V UE G G UT V UTV OHL OHLOHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G F B O F B O OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G GG OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OHL OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OHLGGGG X WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W WET WET KINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE V V V G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB U EX GGV U UG UUUGU G U 24 12 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 1 0 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4- P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 35 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 10 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 9 31 31 19 11 15 21 17 8 RETAIL 9,100 SQ . F T . RE T A I L 9,1 0 0 S Q . F T . R E T A I L 1 0 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 13 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 0.9 AC 0.7 AC 0.7 AC 0.6 AC 4.15 AC 5.1 AC 12.4 AC 4 - P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4 - P L E X 7 , 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD ST-1 ST-2 ST-3 ST-4 ST-8 ST-7 ST-6 ST-5 ST-9 ST-14 ST-12 ST-11 ST-16 ST-10 ST-13 ST-15 AMELIA LAKE F: \ 2 0 2 4 \ B 2 4 0 2 3 3 5 \ C A D \ B 2 4 0 2 3 3 5 . d w g ,Ge o t e c h ,6/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 7 : 5 6 : 5 0 P M braunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2402335 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified:6/27/24 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information B2402335 JAG 3/19/24 JTC Proposed Lino Lakes Development 320 Acres Southwest of Ash Street W. and Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota Soil Boring Location SketchN DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1"= 200' 200'100' Elev./ Depth ft 904.7 0.7 890.9 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, contains lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, very loose to loose (ALLUVIUM) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-2 (4) 3-4-6 (10) 3-5-4 (9) 2-3-3 (6) 2-3-3 (6) qₚtsf MC % 15 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 9.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-3 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133590.8 EASTING:552777.4 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:04/15/24 END DATE:04/15/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:905.4 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Sun, 60°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-3 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 917.2 0.3 907.5 10.0 903.0 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, loose (ALLUVIUM) LEAN CLAY (CL), with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand and Silty Sand, brownish gray, moist, medium to stiff (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-2-4 (6) 16" 3-4-5 (9) 16" 3-4-6 (10) 14" 4-3-3 (6) 16" 5-6-8 (14) 16" qₚtsf MC % 13 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.5 feet while drilling. Water observed at 6.0 feet at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-4 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133672.4 EASTING:553346.0 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/26/24 END DATE:03/26/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:917.5 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, 30°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-4 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 905.2 0.5 901.8 4.0 898.8 7.0 896.8 9.0 892.8 13.0 891.2 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, brown, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, brownish gray, moist, medium dense (ALLUVIUM) FAT CLAY (CH), gray, moist, soft (ALLUVIUM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, gray, wet, very loose (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, moist, medium (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-4-6 (10) 14" 6-6-7 (13) 16" 1-1-1 (2) 18" 1-2-1 (3) 16" 2-3-5 (8) 16" qₚtsf MC % 19 Tests or Remarks P200=8% Water observed at 9.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133278.3 EASTING:552843.5 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:04/15/24 END DATE:04/15/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:905.8 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Sun, 60°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-5 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 914.9 0.3 900.7 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, light brown to brown, moist to wet, very loose to medium dense (ALLUVIUM) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-2-4 (6) 14" 5-6-7 (13) 16" 4-5-4 (9) 18" 3-3-3 (6) 15" 1-1-1 (2) 16" qₚtsf MC % 12 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-6 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133433.6 EASTING:552989.8 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/26/24 END DATE:03/26/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:915.2 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-6 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 919.7 1.2 913.9 7.0 906.4 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, medium dense to loose (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, moist, medium to stiff (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-7-8 (15) 16" 4-4-2 (6) 15" 1-3-3 (6) 16" 2-3-5 (8) 16" 5-6-6 (12) 18" qₚtsf MC % 13 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 2.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-7 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133311.5 EASTING:553301.3 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/26/24 END DATE:03/26/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:920.9 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-7 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 923.5 0.3 910.8 13.0 909.3 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SANDY SILT (ML), trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Grade Sand, brown to grayish brown, moist to wet, loose to medium dense, rust staining (ALLUVIUM) LEAN CLAY (CL), with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brownish gray, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-2-3 (5) 16" 4-6-6 (12) 16" 7-6-4 (10) 16" 2-1-2 (3) 16" 2-4-5 (9) 16" qₚtsf MC % 14 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 5.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-8 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133396.2 EASTING:553720.9 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/26/24 END DATE:03/26/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:923.8 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-8 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 903.2 0.7 899.9 4.0 896.9 7.0 891.9 12.0 889.4 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) CLAYEY SAND (SC), grayish brown, moist, soft (ALLUVIUM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brownish gray, moist to wet, loose (ALLUVIUM) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, grayish brown, wet, loose (ALLUVIUM) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 4-4-5 (9) 14" 4-2-2 (4) 16" 2-3-3 (6) 16" 2-2-3 (5) 16" 2-3-4 (7) 16" qₚtsf MC % 24 Tests or Remarks P200=11% Water observed at 9.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-9 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132990.8 EASTING:552877.8 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:04/15/24 END DATE:04/15/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:903.9 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Sun, 60°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-9 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 923.4 0.7 917.1 7.0 910.1 14.0 903.1 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, loose, rust staining (ALLUVIUM) CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Silty Sand, brownish gray to gray, moist, soft to medium, rust staining (GLACIAL TILL) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, moist, soft to medium (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring immediately grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-3-3 (6) 14" 4-4-5 (9) 16" 2-2-2 (4) 16" 2-2-3 (5) 16" 1-2-2 (4) 17" 2-2-2 (4) 18" 2-3-5 (8) 18" qₚtsf MC % 16 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 5.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-10 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133057.2 EASTING:553272.7 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/25/24 END DATE:03/25/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:924.1 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, Rain, 35°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-10 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 923.1 0.7 916.8 7.0 911.8 12.0 902.8 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, loose (ALLUVIUM) CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, grayish brown, moist, medium (GLACIAL TILL) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, with lenses of Silty Sand, gray, moist, medium (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring immediately grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-3-4 (7) 15" 3-4-4 (8) 16" 1-3-3 (6) 18" 1-3-5 (8) 18" 2-4-4 (8) 18" 3-3-5 (8) 12" 2-3-5 (8) 18" qₚtsf MC % 13 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 5.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-11 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:133107.1 EASTING:553466.5 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/25/24 END DATE:03/25/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:923.8 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, Rain B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-11 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 923.2 0.8 917.1 7.0 903.1 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist to wet, loose to medium dense (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brownish gray to gray, moist, soft to medium (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring immediately grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-4-4 (8) 15" 4-6-6 (12) 16" 1-1-3 (4) 15" 2-3-5 (8) 16" 1-3-4 (7) 18" 2-2-3 (5) 18" 3-4-4 (8) 18" qₚtsf MC % 14 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 5.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-12 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132874.9 EASTING:553426.3 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/25/24 END DATE:03/25/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:924.1 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, Rain B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-12 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 903.4 0.7 895.1 9.0 891.1 13.0 889.6 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, contains lenses of Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, grayish brown, moist to wet, loose (ALLUVIUM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, grayish brown, wet, loose LEAN CLAY (CL), contains lenses of Silty Sand, gray, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-4-4 (8) 16" 4-3-4 (7) 12" 5-4-5 (9) 15" 4-5-5 (10) 15" 4-5-7 (12) 16" qₚtsf MC % 19 Tests or Remarks P200=10% Water observed at 8.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-13 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132637.8 EASTING:552901.3 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:04/15/24 END DATE:04/15/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:904.1 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Sun, 60°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-13 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 916.9 0.8 913.7 4.0 910.7 7.0 903.2 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace roots, brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, contains seams of Clayey Sand, brown, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, grayish brown, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, light brown, wet, medium dense (ALLUVIUM) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-5 (8) 14" 3-4-5 (9) 16" 4-7-7 (14) 15" 4-6-6 (12) 14" 7-7-7 (14) 17" qₚtsf MC % 17 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-14 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132741.4 EASTING:553147.8 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:04/15/24 END DATE:04/15/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:917.7 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Sun, 60°F B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-14 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 924.6 0.7 918.3 7.0 904.3 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brownish gray to gray, moist, soft to stiff (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring immediately grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-4 (7) 16" 4-6-6 (12) 18" 2-2-2 (4) 18" 1-3-5 (8) 18" 4-4-5 (9) 16" 2-3-4 (7) 18" 3-4-4 (8) 18" qₚtsf MC % 15 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.0 feet while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-15 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132576.7 EASTING:553608.4 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/25/24 END DATE:03/25/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:925.3 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, Rain B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-15 page 1 of 1DRAFT Elev./ Depth ft 928.9 0.7 915.1 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, with lenses of Poorly Graded Sand, brown to grayish brown, moist, medium to very stiff, rust staining (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-2 (5) 16" 3-4-4 (8) 16" 3-3-4 (7) 16" 6-6-7 (13) 18" 5-7-10 (17) 18" qₚtsf MC % 15 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2402335 Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Wilkinson Waters Development County Road J & Centerville Road Lino Lakes, Minnesota BORING:ST-16 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Anoka (US Feet) NORTHING:132841.7 EASTING:553883.6 DRILLER:S Hull / A Tross LOGGED BY:J Carlson START DATE:03/25/24 END DATE:03/25/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:929.6 ft RIG:7505 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Field WEATHER:Snow, Rain B2402335 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:08/22/2024 ST-16 page 1 of 1DRAFT Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbol Group NameB Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I CL Lean clayK L M PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M Organic OL CH Fat clayK L M MH Elastic siltK L M Organic OH PT Peat Highly Organic Soils Silts and Clays (Liquid limit less than 50) Silts and Clays (Liquid limit 50 or more) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor Inorganic Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Co a r s e ‐gr a i n e d So i l s (m o r e th a n 50 % re t a i n e d on No . 20 0 sie v e ) Fin e ‐gr a i n e d So i l s (5 0 % or mo r e pa s s e s th e No . 20 0 sie v e ) Sands (50% or more coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% finesC) Gravels with Fines (More than 12% finesC) Clean Sands (Less than 5% finesH) Sands with Fines (More than 12% finesH) Gravels (More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N Organic silt K L M O Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P Organic silt K L M Q ParticleSize Identification Boulders.............. over 12" Cobbles................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay...................... < .005 mm Relative ProportionsL, M trace............................. 0 to 5% little.............................. 6 to 14% with.............................. ≥ 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens............................... 0 to 1/8" seam............................. 1/8" to 1" layer.............................. over 1" Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense.................... over 50 BPF A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve. B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay D. Cu= D60/ D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2/ ሺ𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60) E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay. K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P. PI plots on or above “A” line. Q. PI plots below “A” line. Laboratory Tests DD Dry density,pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf Medium.................... 5to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Drilling Notes: Blows/N‐value: Blows indicatethe driving resistance recorded for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586. PartialPenetration:If the sampler could not be driven through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is reported as "REF" indicating refusal. Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample. WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ), or at some time after drilling ( ). Moisture Content: Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. 5/2021 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix E – Ecological Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 June 21, 2024 Kelly Herfendal ISG RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed North Oaks Mixed Use Development, T31N R22W Sections 33-35; Anoka County Dear Kelly Herfendal, For all correspondence regarding the Natural Heritage Review of this project please include the project ID MCE-2024-00460 in the email subject line. As requested, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System has been reviewed to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact any rare species or other significant natural features. Based on the project details provided with the request, the following rare features may be impacted by the proposed project: Ecologically Significant Areas The Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) has identified a Site of Outstanding Biodiversity Significance in a wetland immediately south of the proposed project. Sites of Biodiversity Significance have varying levels of native biodiversity and are ranked based on the relative significance of this biodiversity at a statewide level. Sites ranked as Outstanding contain the best occurrences of the rarest species, the most outstanding examples of the rarest native plant communities, and/or the largest, most intact functional landscapes present in the state. There are mapped examples of two Native Plant Communities in this Site. They are Northern Mixed Cattail Marsh (MRn83), which has a state conservation rank of Imperiled (S2), and Willow – Dogwood Shrub Swamp (WMn82a), which has a state conservation rank of Secure (S5). The DNR recommends that the project be designed to avoid impacts to these ecologically significant areas. Actions to avoid or minimize disturbance include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o As much as possible, operate within already-disturbed areas. o Retain a buffer between proposed activities and the MBS Site. Page 2 of 5 o When possible, conduct work under frozen ground conditions. o Use effective erosion prevention and sediment control measures. o Inspect and clean equipment prior to operation and follow recommendations to prevent the spread of invasive species. o Revegetate disturbed soil with native species suitable to the local habitat as soon after construction as possible. o Use only weed-free mulches, topsoils, and seed mixes. Of particular concern are birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and crown vetch (Coronilla varia), two invasive species that are sold commercially and are problematic in prairies and disturbed open areas. MBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance and DNR Native Plant Communities can be viewed using the Explore page in Minnesota Conservation Explorer or their GIS shapefiles can be downloaded from the MN Geospatial Commons. Please contact the NH Review Team if you need assistance accessing the data. Reference the MBS Site Biodiversity Significance and Native Plant Community websites for information on interpreting the data. To receive a list of MBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance and DNR Native Plant Communities in the vicinity of your project, create a Conservation Planning Report using the Explore Tab in Minnesota Conservation Explorer. • If the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) is applicable to this project, please note that native plant communities with a Conservation Status Rank of S1 through S3 or wetlands within High or Outstanding MBS Sites of Biodiversity Significance may qualify as Rare Natural Communities (RNC) under WCA. Minnesota Rules, part 8420.0515, subpart 3 states that a wetland replacement plan for activities that modify a RNC must be denied if the local government unit determines the proposed activities will permanently adversely affect the RNC. If the proposed project includes a wetland replacement plan under WCA, please contact your DNR Regional Ecologist for further evaluation. Please visit WCA Program Guidance and Information for additional information, including the Rare Natural Communities Technical Guidance. State-listed Species • Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the direct vicinity of the proposed project. Blanding’s turtles use upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands, waterbodies, and watercourses. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added mortality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding’s turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. This project has the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities and habitat disturbance/destruction due to excavation, fill, and other construction activities associated with Page 3 of 5 the project. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. Given the project details and the potential for a take of a Blanding’s turtle, an avoidance plan is required. We do not currently have a template for avoidance plans. The plan needs to: o Provide a description of the project activities and construction methods, o Identify measures that will be taken to avoid take and minimize disturbance to the species, and o Include a map of disturbance areas. This can include a map of potential Blanding’s turtle summer, winter, and nesting habitat overlayed with timing of project impacts. Measures to avoid or minimize disturbance include, but are not limited to, the following: o Avoidance of suitable habitat, o Timing the impacts to avoid incidental take, o The recommendations listed in the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet, o Training for construction crew. Please submit the completed avoidance plan to the NH Review Team (Reports.NHIS@state.mn.us). • Forster’s tern (Sterna forsteri), a bird species of special concern has been documented nesting in the vicinity of the proposed project. Forster’s terns are found in wetlands with a mixture of emergent vegetation and open water. They nest in colonies on floating vegetation or muskrat houses. Potential concerns include construction disturbance during the breeding season and loss or degradation of habitat. The DNR recommends that initial disturbance to suitable habitat is avoided from April 15-July 15. • The tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), state-listed as a species special concern, has been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. During the active season (approximately April-November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. To minimize these impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. • Please visit the DNR Rare Species Guide for more information on the habitat use of these species and recommended measures to avoid or minimize impacts. Page 4 of 5 Federally Protected Species • The area of interest overlaps with a U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone. The rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) is federally listed as endangered and is likely to be present in suitable habitat within High Potential Zones. From April through October this species uses underground nests in upland grasslands, shrublands, and forest edges, and forages where nectar and pollen are available. From October through April the species overwinters under tree litter in upland forests and woodlands. The rusty patched bumble bee may be impacted by a variety of land management activities including, but not limited to, prescribed fire, tree-removal, haying, grazing, herbicide use, pesticide use, land-clearing, soil disturbance or compaction, or use of non-native bees. If applicable, the DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using BWSR Seed Mixes or MnDOT Seed Mixes. To ensure compliance with federal law, please conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Please note that all projects, regardless of whether there is a federal nexus, are subject to federal take prohibitions. The IPaC review will determine if prohibited take is likely to occur and, if not, will generate an automated letter. The USFWS RPBB guidance provides guidance on avoiding impacts to rusty patched bumble bee and a key for determining if actions are likely to affect the species; the determination key can be found in the appendix. Environmental Review and Permitting • The Environmental Assessment Worksheet should address whether the proposed project has the potential to adversely affect the above rare features and, if so, it should identify specific measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance. Sufficient information should be provided so the DNR can determine whether a takings permit will be needed for any of the above protected species. • Please include a copy of this letter and the MCE-generated Final Project Report in any state or local license or permit application. Please note that measures to avoid or minimize disturbance to the above rare features may be included as restrictions or conditions in any required permits or licenses. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota’s rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If Page 5 of 5 additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and project description provided with the request. If project details change or the project has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review within one year of initiating project activities. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. Visit the Natural Heritage Review website for additional information regarding this process, survey guidance, and other related information. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, you may contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Thank you for consulting us on this matter and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, James Drake Natural Heritage Review Specialist James.F.Drake@state.mn.us Cc: Melissa Collins, Jennie Skancke, Amanda Weise 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2025-0003787 Project Name: North Oaks Mixed Use Development EAW Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: This response has been generated by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) system to provide information on natural resources that could be affected by your project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides this response under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Threatened and Endangered Species The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirement for obtaining a Technical Assistance Letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Consultation Technical Assistance Please refer to refer to our Section 7 website for guidance and technical assistance, including step-by-step instructions for making effects determinations for each species that might be present and for specific guidance on the following types of projects: projects in developed areas, HUD, CDBG, EDA, USDA Rural Development projects, pipelines, buried utilities, telecommunications, and requests for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 2 of 16 1. 2. We recommend running the project (if it qualifies) through our Minnesota-Wisconsin Federal Endangered Species Determination Key (Minnesota-Wisconsin ("D-key")). A demonstration video showing how-to access and use the determination key is available. Please note that the Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key is the third option of 3 available d-keys. D-keys are tools to help Federal agencies and other project proponents determine if their proposed action has the potential to adversely affect federally listed species and designated critical habitat. The Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key includes a structured set of questions that assists a project proponent in determining whether a proposed project qualifies for a certain predetermined consultation outcome for all federally listed species found in Minnesota and Wisconsin (except for the northern long-eared bat- see below), which includes determinations of “no effect” or “may affect, not likely to adversely affect." In each case, the Service has compiled and analyzed the best available information on the species’ biology and the impacts of certain activities to support these determinations. If your completed d-key output letter shows a "No Effect" (NE) determination for all listed species, print your IPaC output letter for your files to document your compliance with the Endangered Species Act. For Federal projects with a “Not Likely to Adversely Affect” (NLAA) determination, our concurrence becomes valid if you do not hear otherwise from us after a 30-day review period, as indicated in your letter. If your d-key output letter indicates additional coordination with the Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office is necessary (i.e., you get a “May Affect” determination), you will be provided additional guidance on contacting the Service to continue ESA coordination outside of the key; ESA compliance cannot be concluded using the key for “May Affect” determinations unless otherwise indicated in your output letter. Note: Once you obtain your official species list, you are not required to continue in IPaC with d-keys, although in most cases these tools should expedite your review. If you choose to make an effects determination on your own, you may do so. If the project is a Federal Action, you may want to review our section 7 step-by-step instructions before making your determinations. Using the IPaC Official Species List to Make No Effect and May Affect Determinations for Listed Species If IPaC returns a result of “There are no listed species found within the vicinity of the project,” then project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on any federally listed species under Service jurisdiction. Concurrence from the Service is not required for no effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. If IPaC returns one or more federally listed, proposed, or candidate species as potentially present in the action area of the proposed project – other than bats (see below) – then project proponents must determine if proposed activities will have no effect on or may affect those species. For assistance in determining if suitable habitat for listed, candidate, or proposed species occurs within your project area or if species may be affected by project activities, you can obtain Life History Information for Listed and Candidate Species on our office website. If no impacts will occur to a species on the IPaC species list (e.g., there is no habitat present in the project area), the appropriate determination is no effect. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 3 of 16 3. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Should you determine that project activities may affect any federally listed, please contact our office for further coordination. Letters with requests for consultation or correspondence about your project should include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header. Electronic submission is preferred. Northern Long-Eared Bats Northern long-eared bats occur throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin and the information below may help in determining if your project may affect these species. Suitable summer habitat for northern long-eared bats consists of a wide variety of forested/wooded habitats where they roost, forage, and travel and may also include some adjacent and interspersed non-forested habitats such as emergent wetlands and adjacent edges of agricultural fields, old fields and pastures. This includes forests and woodlots containing potential roosts (i.e., live trees and/or snags ≥3 inches dbh for northern long- eared bat that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or hollows), as well as linear features such as fencerows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. These wooded areas may be dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy closure. Individual trees may be considered suitable habitat when they exhibit the characteristics of a potential roost tree and are located within 1,000 feet (305 meters) of forested/wooded habitat. Northern long-eared bats have also been observed roosting in human-made structures, such as buildings, barns, bridges, and bat houses; therefore, these structures should also be considered potential summer habitat and evaluated for use by bats. If your project will impact caves or mines or will involve clearing forest or woodland habitat containing suitable roosting habitat, northern long-eared bats could be affected. For bat activity dates, please review Appendix L in the Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long- Eared Bat Survey Guidelines. Examples of unsuitable habitat include: Individual trees that are greater than 1,000 feet from forested or wooded areas, Trees found in highly developed urban areas (e.g., street trees, downtown areas), A pure stand of less than 3-inch dbh trees that are not mixed with larger trees, and A monoculture stand of shrubby vegetation with no potential roost trees. If IPaC returns a result that northern long-eared bats are potentially present in the action area of the proposed project, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities may affect this species IF one or more of the following activities are proposed: Clearing or disturbing suitable roosting habitat, as defined above, at any time of year, Any activity in or near the entrance to a cave or mine, Mining, deep excavation, or underground work within 0.25 miles of a cave or mine, Construction of one or more wind turbines, or Demolition or reconstruction of human-made structures that are known to be used by bats based on observations of roosting bats, bats emerging at dusk, or guano deposits or stains. If none of the above activities are proposed, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on the northern long-eared bat. Concurrence from the Service is not required for No Effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 4 of 16 species list report for your records. If any of the above activities are proposed, and the northern long-eared bat appears on the user’s species list, the federal project user will be directed to either the range-wide northern long-eared bat D-key or the Federal Highways Administration, Federal Railways Administration, and Federal Transit Administration Indiana bat/ Northern long-eared bat D-key, depending on the type of project and federal agency involvement. Similar to the Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key, these d-keys helps to determine if prohibited take might occur and, if not, will generate an automated verification letter. Additional information about available tools can be found on the Service’s northern long-eared bat website. Whooping Crane Whooping crane is designated as a non-essential experimental population in Wisconsin and consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act is only required if project activities will occur within a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park. If project activities are proposed on lands outside of a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park, then you are not required to consult. For additional information on this designation and consultation requirements, please review “Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Whooping Cranes in the Eastern United States.” Other Trust Resources and Activities Bald and Golden Eagles - Although the bald eagle has been removed from the endangered species list, this species and the golden eagle are protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to survey the area for any migratory bird nests. If there is an eagle nest on-site while work is on-going, eagles may be disturbed. We recommend avoiding and minimizing disturbance to eagles whenever practicable. If you cannot avoid eagle disturbance, you may seek a permit. A nest take permit is always required for removal, relocation, or obstruction of an eagle nest. For communication and wind energy projects, please refer to additional guidelines below. Migratory Birds - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Service. The Service has the responsibility under the MBTA to proactively prevent the mortality of migratory birds whenever possible and we encourage implementation of recommendations that minimize potential impacts to migratory birds. Such measures include clearing forested habitat outside the nesting season (generally March 1 to August 31) or conducting nest surveys prior to clearing to avoid injury to eggs or nestlings. Communication Towers - Construction of new communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night-migrating birds. However, the Service has developed voluntary guidelines for minimizing impacts. Transmission Lines - Migratory birds, especially large species with long wingspans, heavy bodies, and poor maneuverability can also collide with power lines. In addition, mortality can occur when birds, particularly hawks, eagles, kites, falcons, and owls, attempt to perch on uninsulated or unguarded power poles. To minimize these risks, please refer to guidelines developed by the Avian Power Line Interaction Committee and the Service. Implementation of these measures is especially important along sections of lines adjacent to wetlands or other areas that support large numbers of raptors and migratory birds. Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 5 of 16 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Wind Energy - To minimize impacts to migratory birds and bats, wind energy projects should follow the Service’s Wind Energy Guidelines. In addition, please refer to the Service's Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, which provides guidance for conserving bald and golden eagles in the course of siting, constructing, and operating wind energy facilities. State Department of Natural Resources Coordination While it is not required for your Federal section 7 consultation, please note that additional state endangered or threatened species may also have the potential to be impacted. Please contact the Minnesota or Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for information on state listed species that may be present in your proposed project area. Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: Review.NHIS@state.mn.us Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: DNRERReview@wi.gov We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. Please feel free to contact our office with questions or for additional information. Attachment(s): Official Species List USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries Bald & Golden Eagles Migratory Birds Wetlands OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 (952) 858-0793 Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 6 of 16 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code:2025-0003787 Project Name:North Oaks Mixed Use Development EAW Project Type:Mixed-Use Construction Project Description:The North Oaks Company LLC is proposing construction of a mixed-use development located at in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. The project will include the construction of senior housing, market-rate apartments, affordable housing, commercial space, and single-family lots. Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@45.12605105,-93.06444056335064,14z Counties:Anoka and Ramsey counties, Minnesota Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 7 of 16 1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. 1 Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 8 of 16 BIRDS NAME STATUS Whooping Crane Grus americana Population: U.S.A. (AL, AR, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NC, NM, OH, SC, TN, UT, VA, WI, WV, western half of WY) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 Experimental Population, Non- Essential CLAMS NAME STATUS Salamander Mussel Simpsonaias ambigua There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6208 Proposed Endangered INSECTS NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Candidate Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383 General project design guidelines: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/project/7E5PWDWKSZFCFNAIJCK3TBXOQU/ documents/generated/5967.pdf Endangered Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/12017 Proposed Threatened CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS AND FISH HATCHERIES Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 9 of 16 1. 2. 3. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or golden eagles, or their habitats , should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles". The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Dec 1 to Aug 31 Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680 Breeds elsewhere PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. 1 2 3 Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 10 of 16 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence Probability of Presence () Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season () Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Golden Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Additional information can be found using the following links: Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- project-action MIGRATORY BIRDS Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . 1 2 Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 11 of 16 1. 2. 3. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles". The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Dec 1 to Aug 31 Black Tern Chlidonias niger surinamenisis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3093 Breeds May 15 to Aug 20 Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399 Breeds May 15 to Oct 10 Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9454 Breeds May 20 to Jul 31 Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9643 Breeds May 20 to Aug 10 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406 Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 3 Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 12 of 16 NAME BREEDING SEASON Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680 Breeds elsewhere Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745 Breeds May 1 to Jul 20 Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8329 Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 20 Henslow's Sparrow Centronyx henslowii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3941 Breeds May 1 to Aug 31 Le Conte's Sparrow Ammospiza leconteii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9469 Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 15 Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 Breeds elsewhere Long-eared Owl asio otus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3631 Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15 Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9561 Breeds elsewhere Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9398 Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9478 Breeds elsewhere Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 13 of 16 no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence NAME BREEDING SEASON Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9603 Breeds elsewhere Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480 Breeds elsewhere Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431 Breeds May 10 to Aug 31 PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season () Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 14 of 16 Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Black Tern BCC Rangewide (CON) Black-billed Cuckoo BCC Rangewide (CON) Bobolink BCC Rangewide (CON) Canada Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide (CON) Golden Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Golden-winged Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Grasshopper Sparrow BCC - BCR Henslow's Sparrow BCC Rangewide (CON) Le Conte's Sparrow BCC Rangewide (CON) Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Long-eared Owl BCC Rangewide (CON) Pectoral Sandpiper BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 15 of 16 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Rusty Blackbird BCC - BCR Semipalmated Sandpiper BCC - BCR Short-billed Dowitcher BCC Rangewide (CON) Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- project-action WETLANDS Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND PEM1C PEM1A PEM1F FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PSS1/EM1C Project code: 2025-0003787 10/09/2024 15:07:50 UTC 16 of 16 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency:ISG Name:Jeremy Groskreutz Address:115 East Hickory Street, Suite 300 City:Mankato State:MN Zip:56001 Email jeremy.groskreutz@isginc.com Phone:5073876651 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Exhibit A - Site PlanAppendix F – SHPO Correspondence From: Kelly Herfendal Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 9:27 AM To: Jeremy Groskreutz Subject: FW: North Oaks Mixed Use Development - Request for Project Review From: Kelly Herfendal <Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 11:45 AM To: Nick McCabe <Nick.McCabe@ISGInc.com>; Paul Marston <Paul.Marston@ISGInc.com> Subject: FW: North Oaks Mixed Use Development - Request for Project Review I received this email in response to the SHPO request for the North Oaks EAW: SHPO will no longer be sending official responses to our project review requests. I emailed DataRequestsSHPO@state.mn.us to get a different response which has been used previously for search requests, but this is the response I received: Thank you for reaching out to the SHPO Research Request Email. Our research request procedures have recently changed because we have launched the Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP)! Please visit MnSHIP and the OSA Portal to perform research yourself. You can also visit https://npgallery.nps.gov/nrhp to obtain National Register of Historic Places nominations and information. If you are a qualified archaeologist requesting other information, please send a new request titled to reflect your request type. Other information that can be requested from SHPO includes: archaeological site eligibility status/determinations, survey reports (architecture-history and archaeology), and restricted property information. You can visit our Research @ SHPO webpage to learn more about how to obtain information you may need for your research: https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/surveyandinventory/research/ Research requests will now be done ourselves through the provided links. From: GraggJohnson, Kelly (ADM) <kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 6:25 PM To: Kelly Herfendal <Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com> Subject: RE: North Oaks Mixed Use Development - Request for Project Review Due to limited staff and resources, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office is no longer able to provide formal responses to technical assistance requests. Instead, we encourage you to use Minnesota’s Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP), which is an online tool that can help you identify any previously identified above-ground historic resources that may be located within your project area. For more information on MnSHIP, please see this link: Minnesota's Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (mn.gov) We also encourage you to visit the Office of the State Archaeologist’s online portal to access the Public Map which may help you identify if there are any previously identified archaeological sites located in your general project area. Archaeological site information is protected, so detailed information on archaeological sites is reserved for qualified archaeologists and historic preservation professionals, tribal historic preservation officers, and the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council. For more information regarding the OSA portal, please see this link: https://osaportal.gisdata.mn.gov/ Qualified archaeologists can request additional information from SHPO about archaeological site eligibility status/determinations, survey reports (architecture-history and archaeology), and restricted property information. You can visit the Research @ SHPO webpage to learn more about how to obtain information you may need for your research to identify historic properties that may be affected by your project: https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/surveyandinventory/research/ It is our understanding that the goal of the EAW is to describe how a proposed project may affect the environment, which includes historic resources. An archaeological assessment of the project (a Phase Ia) will help determine whether the project has the potential to affect known or suspected archaeological sites. A Phase I archaeological survey will provide more information regarding whether known or previously unknown archaeological sites are located within the proposed project area. These studies should be developed and structured to best inform the project’s effects on archaeological resources. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website https://www.mnhs.org/preservation/directory, and select “Archaeologists” in the “Specialties” box. If the proposed project will use federal funds, occur on federal land, or will require a federal permit (such as a USACE 404 permit), it may be subject to review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If the project becomes a federal undertaking, additional consultation between the federal agency and the SHPO will be necessary in order to define an appropriate area of potential effect (APE) for the federal undertaking as well as the necessary historic property identification and evaluation efforts required for a federal review, and this information will be helpful to help the project move forward. Kelly Gragg-Johnson (she/her/hers) | Environmental Review Program Specialist 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3285 | kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us Please reference this SHPO Environmental Review Program Update regarding current project review timelines and staffing changes for the Environmental Review Program. From: Kelly Herfendal <Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 8:49 AM To: MN_ADM_ENV Review SHPO <ENReviewSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: North Oaks Mixed Use Development - Request for Project Review Good morning, Please see the attached request for project review for an EAW for the North Oaks Mixed Use Development project located in Lino Lakes, Anoka County, MN. Let me know if additional information is needed. Thank you, Kelly Herfendal Environmental Scientist Employee Owner P 507.387.6651 E Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com W ISGInc.com You don't often get email from kelly.herfendal@isginc.com. Learn why this is important This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. From: Kelly Herfendal Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 9:28 AM To: Jeremy Groskreutz Subject: FW: Search Request From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 11:34 AM To: Kelly Herfendal <Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com> Subject: RE: Search Request Thank you for reaching out to the SHPO Research Request Email. Our research request procedures have recently changed because we have launched the Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP)! Please visit MnSHIP and the OSA Portal to perform research yourself. You can also visit https://npgallery.nps.gov/nrhp to obtain National Register of Historic Places nominations and information. If you are a qualified archaeologist requesting other information, please send a new request titled to reflect your request type. Other information that can be requested from SHPO includes: archaeological site eligibility status/determinations, survey reports (architecture-history and archaeology), and restricted property information. You can visit our Research @ SHPO webpage to learn more about how to obtain information you may need for your research: https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/surveyandinventory/research/ Thank you, Lucy H. SHPO Research Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 datarequestshpo@state.mn.us From: Kelly Herfendal <Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 10:51 AM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: Search Request Good morning, You don't often get email from kelly.herfendal@isginc.com. Learn why this is important This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. I am writing to inquire about a database search of any archaeological, historical, or architectural resources at the site of a proposed housing development. The site is located within Section 34 of Lino Lakes Township (T31N, R22W) in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, MN. I have attached a shapefile for your reference. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Kelly Herfendal Kelly Herfendal Environmental Scientist Employee Owner P 507.387.6651 E Kelly.Herfendal@ISGInc.com W ISGInc.com Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix G – Greenhouse Gas Calculations Appendix G – Greenhouse Gas Calculations ISGHG Calculator Verion 0.1 Last Updated: 8/3/22 Project Name North Oaks Mixed Use Development Reviewer Jeremy Groskreutz Date 10/14/2024 State MN County Anoka Project Lifespan 50 Emission Sources Greenhouse Gases Emitted CO2e TPY Emitted Stationary Sources -/--/- Mobile Sources CO2, CH4, and N20 6,829.24 Off-Site Purchased Energy CO2, CH4, and N20 1,577.82 Purchased Steam/Heat -/--/- Waste Management CO2 386.34 Purchased Gases -/--/- Mitigation Sources Greenhouse Gases Mitigated CO2e TPY Mitigated Land-Use Mititgation -/--/- Renewable Energy Credits -/--/- Emissions - Mitigations = Total CO2e TPY Emitted 8,793.40 >25,000 TPY CO2e Emitted?No >100,000 TPY CO2e Emitted?No Emission Source Project Phase Emissions Scope Stationary Sources -/--/- Mobile Sources Operations, , , ConstructionConstructionConstructionScope-1 Off-Site Purchased Energy Operations Scope-2 Purchased Steam/Heat -/--/- Waste Management Operations Scope-3 Purchased Gases -/--/- Mitigation Source Project Phase Emissions Scope Land-Use Mititgation -/--/- Renewable Energy Credits -/--/- Known Gases Emitted kg Emitted Yearly Short Tons Emitted Yearly CO2 7,605,873.41 8,384.08 CH4 244.75 0.27 N2O 49.41 0.05 Stationary Source Emissions ID Phase Fuel Type Generator Type Hours Operated Fuel Spent Daily mmBtu Output 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ID Phase kg CO2 Produced kg CH4 Emitted kg N2O Emitted kg CO2e Daily CO2e TPY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Federal Register EPA; 40 CFR Part 98; e-CFR. Table C-1, Table C-2 (as amended at 81 FR 89252, Dec. 9, 2016), Table AA-1 (78 FR 71965, Nov. 29, 2013). Total Stationary Source Emissions Mobile Source Emissions ID Phase Vehicle Type Fuel Type Year Yearly mi MPG Ga Used (Off-Road) 1 Const.Construction/Mining Equipment Diesel 2019 10,950.00 2.5 2 Const.Heavy-Duty Vehicles Diesel 2019 6,480.00 6 3 Const.Light-Duty Trucks Gasoline 2019 10,950.00 25 4 Op.Passenger Cars Gasoline 2019 12,045.00 25 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ID # Veh.kg CO2 Emitted kg CH4 Emitted kg N20 Emitted kg CO2e Yearly CO2e TPY 1 62 55,452.55 --55,452.55 61.13 2 9 1,984.82 0.01 0.05 2,000.08 2.20 3 30 2,187.94 0.05 0.01 2,191.80 2.42 4 1527 6,125,141.95 93.80 27.59 6,135,708.56 6,763.50 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Total Mobile Source Emissions 6,829.24 Offsite Purchased Energy Emissions eGRID Subregion Yrly. Energy Usage kg CO2e Emitted kg CH4 Emitted kg N2O Emitted MROW (MRO West)3199.23 1,421,106.14 150.89 21.76 kg CO2e Emitted CO2e TPY 1,431,363.64 1,577.82 Offsite Steam and Heat Emissions mmBtu Purchased Yrly.kg CO2 Emitted kg CH4 Emitted kg N2O Emitted kg CO2e Emitted CO2e TPY Waste Management Emissions ID Waste Type Disposal Method Tons Disposed Yrly CO2e TPY 1 Mixed MSW Landfilled 674 386.34 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total CO2e TPY 386.34 General/Refidgerative Gases ID Gas Gas (lb)GWP CO2e (lb)CO2e (Tons) 1 2 3 4 5 100yr GWPs from IPCC 4th Assessment Rerport (AR4), 2007. Blended Refridgerative Gases ID Gas Gas (lb)GWP CO2e (lb)CO2e (Tons) 1 2 3 4 5 100yr GWPs from IPCC 4th Assessment Rerport (AR4), 2007. Tot. CO2e TPY Land-based Mitigation ID Restoration Acreage Sequest. Rate (Mton/Acre/Yr)Total Seques. (MTon/Yr)CO2e TPY 1 2 3 4 5 Tot. CO2e TPY Renewable Energy Credits Credits Bought eGrid Subregion kg CO2 Mitigated kg CH4 Mitigated kg N2O Mitigated MROW (MRO West) kg CO2e Mitigated CO2e TPY Mitig. Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning EAW Appendix G – Greenhouse Gas Calculations Appendix H – Traffic Impact Study Ash Street Traffic Impact Study Prepared by: ISG Prepared for: North Oaks Company LLC Submitted to: Anoka County, Minnesota Project No. 24-30671 October 14th, 2024 PREPARED FOR : North Oaks Company LLC Lauren Grouws VP Development 5959 Centerville Road, Suite 200 North Oaks, MN 55127 Lauren@northoaks.com PREPARED BY : ISG Corona Woychik, PE, PTOE Project Engineer 201 Main Street, Suite 1020 La Crosse, WI 54601 Corona.Woychik@ISGInc.com 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page i SIGNATURE SHEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE CALCULATIONS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Corona V. Woychik, PE, PTOE Project Engineer License No. 59049 Documents covered by this seal: Ash Street Traffic Impact Study ISG 201 Main Street, Suite 1020 La Crosse, WI 54601 Ash Street Traffic Impact Study Lino Lakes, Minnesota Engineer's Project Number: 24-30671 Dated this 14th day of October 2024 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary, Conclusions, + Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Findings .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Conclusions + Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Study Objectives .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis of Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Location, Zoning, and Land Use ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Area Roadway System ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Traffic Volumes and Analysis Assumptions ............................................................................................................................ 3 Peak Hourly Factor ............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Crash Analysis .................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Proposed Development ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Site Traffic ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Growth Rate ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Analysis of Future Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Capacity and Level of Service at Studied Intersections – AM and PM Peak Hours ....................................................................... 20 Principal Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Conclusions + Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 57 APPENDICES Appendix A: Wilkinson Preliminary Plan and North Oaks Farms Site Concept ...................................................................................... A Appendix B: Project Location Map ........................................................................................................................................................... B Appendix C: Intersection Map .................................................................................................................................................................. C Appendix D: Existing Zoning and Future Land Use Maps .......................................................................................................................D Appendix E: Existing and Planned Intersection Control Exhibits ............................................................................................................ E Appendix F: Existing (2024) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Diagrams .................................................................................... F Appendix G: Existing (2024) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ...................................................................................................................G Appendix H: Map and Crash Detail Report ..............................................................................................................................................H Appendix I: Internal Capture Charts .......................................................................................................................................................... I Appendix J: Trip Distribution ...................................................................................................................................................................... J Appendix K: Trip Assignment .................................................................................................................................................................... K Appendix L: Future Scenario Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Diagrams ................................................................................... L Appendix M: Opening Year No Build (2025) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ......................................................................................... M Appendix N: Opening Year Build (2025) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ............................................................................................... N Appendix O: Design Year No Build (2045) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ............................................................................................. O Appendix P: Design Year Build (2045) Synchro Analysis Worksheets ................................................................................................... P 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page iii Appendix Q: Right-Turn Warrant Analyses ............................................................................................................................................... Q Appendix R: Left-Turn Warrant Analyses ................................................................................................................................................. R TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 .................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 .................................................................................................................... 5 Table 3: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 .................................................................................................................... 6 Table 4: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 .................................................................................................................... 7 Table 5: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 .................................................................................................................... 8 Table 6: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 .................................................................................................................... 9 Table 7: Crash Locations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 8: Wilkinson Development Trip Generation for Opening Year 2025 ........................................................................................ 13 Table 9: Wilkinson Development Trip Generation for Opening Year 2025 - Adjusted for Internal Capture ..................................... 13 Table 10: North Oaks Farms Trip Generation ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 11: Trip Generation for Design Year 2045 ................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 13: Historical AADT along CSAH 32 / Ash Street ....................................................................................................................... 16 Table 12: Historical AADT along CSAH 21 / Centerville Rd ................................................................................................................. 16 Table 14: Historical Lino Lakes Population Growth ............................................................................................................................. 17 Table 15: Historical Lino Lakes Household .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 16: Growth Rate Sources ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 Table 17: Selected Growth Rates ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 18: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 ...................................................................................... 21 Table 19: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 ...................................................................................... 22 Table 20: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 ...................................................................................... 23 Table 21: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 ...................................................................................... 24 Table 22: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 ...................................................................................... 25 Table 23: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 ...................................................................................... 26 Table 24: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 ............................................................................................ 27 Table 25: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 ............................................................................................ 28 Table 26: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 ............................................................................................ 29 Table 27: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 ............................................................................................ 30 Table 28: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 ............................................................................................ 31 Table 29: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 ............................................................................................ 32 Table 30: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 7 ............................................................................................ 33 Table 31: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 ......................................................................................... 34 Table 32: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 ......................................................................................... 35 Table 33: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 ......................................................................................... 36 Table 34: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 ......................................................................................... 37 Table 35: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 ......................................................................................... 38 Table 36: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 ......................................................................................... 39 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page iv Table 37: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 .............................................................................................. 40 Table 38: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 .............................................................................................. 41 Table 39: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 .............................................................................................. 42 Table 40: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 .............................................................................................. 43 Table 41: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 .............................................................................................. 44 Table 42: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 .............................................................................................. 45 Table 43: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 7 .............................................................................................. 46 Table 44: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 8 .............................................................................................. 47 Table 45: Intersection 1 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 48 Table 46: Intersection 2 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 49 Table 47: Intersection 3 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 50 Table 48: Intersection 4 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 51 Table 49: Intersection 5 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 52 Table 50: Intersection 6 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 53 Table 51: Intersection 7 Scenario Comparison.................................................................................................................................... 54 Table 52: Intersection 8 Scenario Comparison................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 53: Left-Turn Lane Warrant Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 56 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, + RECOMMENDATIONS Summary This study has been prepared in anticipation of two proposed mixed used and residential developments along Ash Street in Lino Lakes, MN. The proposed sites, 116 acres total, are currently vacant and anticipated to be developed in two major phases. The sites are located west of Centerville Road along Ash Street between Centerville Road and Holly Drive. The proposed development will consist of the Wilkinson development and the North Oaks Farms development and will include townhomes, retail, apartments, senior adult housing, and single-family residences. The Wilkinson area, consisting of townhomes, retail, apartments, and senior adult housing, would be the first phase and is anticipated to be fully operational in 2025. The North Oaks Farms area, consisting of single-family residences, would be the next phase, and areas would be fully developed by 2045, the Design Year. See Appendix A for a preliminary site plan for the proposed Wilkison development and a preliminary concept for the North Oaks Farms area. This Traffic Impact Study (TIS) studied current, projected, and future traffic conditions at several locations in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. These locations included in the study area are: • Intersection 1 – The intersection of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH J/Ash Street • Intersection 2 – The intersection of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH 32/Ash Street • Intersection 3 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Monarch Way / the North Oaks Farms area’s South Access • Intersection 4 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Rapp Farm Blvd • Intersection 5 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Holly Drive N • Intersection 6 – The intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd and the Wilkinson area’s South Access • Intersection 7 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and the Wilkinson area’s North Access • Intersection 8 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and the North Oaks Farms area’s East Access Turning movement traffic count data was collected at Intersections 1-5 above from 6:00AM - 9:00AM, and from 3:30PM – 6:30PM on Thursday, July 18th, 2024. Traffic was analyzed based on collected data. Findings In the existing condition, the southbound approach at Intersection 1 operates at a level of service F. All other movements operate at a level of service D or better at the study intersections during the Weekday AM and the Weekday PM peak hours. In the existing condition, all existing major intersections operate as stop-controlled. Reconstruction of major intersections is planned for 2025, and Intersection 1 and Intersection 2 are proposed to be converted to roundabouts. Historical traffic volumes in the area have held steady or decreased over the past 20 years; however, traffic forecasts completed in the last 5 years indicate that traffic growth is expected. The proposed developments will account for much of the traffic growth anticipated over the next 20 years, and growth rates were selected to account for background traffic growth separate from traffic growth attributed to the proposed developments. The assumed average annual traffic growth rates used for the future scenarios were the following: 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 2 of 2 • 0.5% along CSAH 21/Centerville Road south of Intersection 1, • 1.0% along CSAH 21/Centerville Road between Intersections 1 and 2, • 1.0% for CSAH J/Ash Street east of Intersection 1, • 0.8% for CSAH 21/Centerville Road north of Intersection 2, and • 0% for CSAH 32/Ash Stret west of Intersection 2. In the design year, 2045, with construction of the proposed development, all movements are expected to operate at a level of service C or better for the Weekday AM and Weekday PM peak hours. From the completed study, it is found that the proposed mixed used and residential developments along Ash Street will increase vehicular volumes and average delays at the studied intersections, and the planned roadway geometry is able to accommodate the changes in traffic volumes and distribution patterns. Vehicle queue lengths will generally increase but are not expected to impact development site circulation. Conclusions + Recommendations The proposed residential and mixed-use developments along Ash Street are slated to begin operations by 2025, with full completion expected by 2045. Currently, traffic conditions on the southbound approach of the CSAH 21/Centerville Rd and CSAH J/Ash Street intersection are poor, operating at a level of service F. However, planned improvements, including the conversion to roundabouts, are anticipated to enhance traffic flow to a level of service C or better regardless of proposed development construction. While no new right- or left-turn lanes are warranted due to the developments, a left-turn lane at the CSAH 32/Ash Street and Holly Drive intersection is indicated, although safety data shows no significant need for its construction. Additionally, higher-than-average crash rates along CSAH 32/Ash Street suggest a need for roadway geometry changes between Monarch Way and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd. A proposed realignment should meet AASHTO standards and a suggested design speed of 45 MPH. Recommended for the proposed developments, sidewalks and shared-use paths should be incorporated within the developments to enhance pedestrian and bicyclist connectivity. Finally, while the planned intersection geometry and traffic control should accommodate anticipated traffic demands, re-evaluation is recommended if growth projections change. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 1 of 57 INTRODUCTION Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to document the methodologies, findings, recommendations, and conclusions of the Ash Street traffic impact analysis study, including the basis for all assumptions, traffic parameters, and conclusions. This report presents data in a logical format including tables and figures to convey the data and its meaning accurately and clearly. Study Objectives The objectives of this study include the following: • Identify the impacts to the transportation system and immediate area projected for the proposed development. • Recommend necessary improvements to the adjacent transportation system to minimize crash risk and maintain a safe and efficient system. • Protect the safety and functionality of the transportation system while providing sufficient access for the proposed development. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location, Zoning, and Land Use This report studies the projected impacts of two proposed developments in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. Preliminary site plans and concepts can be found in Appendix A, and a project location map is included in Appendix B. The site is currently vacant and will be developed in two phases. Phase 1 consists of Wilkinson development situated northeast of the intersection of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH J/Ash Street. Phase 2 includes the North Oaks Farms development located east of Parcel 3 (Phase 1) between the Wilkinson development and Monarch Way. Intersections 1 – 8, were studied: • Intersection 1 – The intersection of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH J/Ash Street • Intersection 2 – The intersection of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH 32/Ash Street • Intersection 3 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Monarch Way • Intersection 4 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Rapp Farm Blvd • Intersection 5 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Holly Drive N • Intersection 6 – The intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd and the Wilkinson area’s South Access • Intersection 7 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and the Wilkinson area’s North Access • Intersection 8 – The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and the North Oaks Farms area’s East Access The figure in Appendix C identifies these intersections and shows their location within the City of Lino Lakes, which has a population of 21,399 (US Census 2020). Surrounding properties are residential (south) and agricultural (north, east, and west). The proposed sites and surrounding areas are zoned as Rural per the City of Lino Lake’s most recent zoning map (updated January 2023). The proposed sites and surrounding areas are shown as Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 2 of 57 Density Residential, and Signature Gateway District per the City of Lino Lakes Future Land Use Map from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Existing Zoning and Future Land Use maps are provided in Appendix E. Area Roadway System Through the study area: • CSAH J/Ash Street functionally classified as a minor arterial • CSAH 21/Centerville Road classified as a minor arterial • CSAH 32/Ash Street classified as a minor arterial • Monarch Way classified as a local street • Rapp Farm Blvd classified as a local street • Holly Drive N classified as a minor collector • Wilkinson Lake Blvd classified as a local street ROADWAY GEOMETRY Through the study area, Centerville Road also known as CSAH 21, is a north-south highway with a posted speed limit of 50 MPH. The typical roadway section is a two-lane undivided roadway with a northbound right-turn lane at the intersection with CSAH J/Ash Street. It is an asphalt roadway with 7-foot right shoulders and 9-foot left shoulders, and no sidewalk. The existing paved shoulders are suitable bicycle accommodations as they meet the minimum required width of 8’ for this roadway per MnDOT’s Bicycle Facility Design Manual. Within the study area, Ash Street also known as CSAH J, is an east-west street with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. The typical roadway section consists of a two-lane undivided roadway with a westbound right-turn lane at the intersection with CSAH 21/Centerville Road. It is an asphalt roadway with 8-foot shoulders on both sides, and no sidewalk. The existing paved shoulders are suitable bicycle accommodations as they meet the minimum required width of 8’ for this roadway per MnDOT’s Bicycle Facility Design Manual. Ash Street, also known as CSAH 32, is an east-west street with a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. Similarly CSAH J/Ash Street, has a typical roadway section and a two-lane undivided asphalt roadway with 5-foot shoulders on both sides, without sidewalks or bicycle accommodations. Wilkinson Lake Blvd is the west approach on the intersection of CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 21/Centerville Road, Wilkinson Lake Blvd is an east-west street local street that continues the CSAH J segment through the city. The typical roadway section consists of a divided two-lane roadway with variations on the median widths along the segment. It is an asphalt roadway with gutters on both sides, but no sidewalk or bicycle accommodations. Within the study area, Monarch Way is a north-south asphalt roadway with a typical roadway section of two-lane undivided roadway with curb and gutter. It serves the residential area south of the development with no sidewalk or bicycle accommodations. Rapp Farm Blvd is a north-south asphalt roadway serving the residential area south of the development. The typical roadway section consists of two-lane undivided roadway with curb and gutter. At the intersection with CSAH J/Ash Street, Rapp Farm Blvd is divided by 17-foot wide median. No sidewalk or bicycle accommodations are provided. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 3 of 57 Holly Drive N is a north-south roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. The typical roadway section is an asphalt two-lane undivided roadway with no shoulders, sidewalk or bicycle accommodations. TRAFFIC CONTROL The intersection of CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd is all-way-stop controlled. CSAH 32/Ash Street is stop- controlled at its intersection with CSAH 21/Centerville Road, and a northbound left-turn bypass is provided. Monarch Way, Rapp Farm Blvd, and Holly Drive N are stop controlled at their intersections with CSAH 32/Ash Street. There are plans to reconstruct the CSAH 21/Centerville Rd’s intersections with CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 32/Ash Street from stop-controlled intersections into roundabouts, and this is anticipated to be completed in 2025. The intersection of CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Intersection 1) will be a single lane roundabout with 10-foot shared use paths providing bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. The intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street / CSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Intersection 2) will be a single lane roundabout with 8-foot and 10-foot shared use paths providing bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Exhibits showing the existing and planned traffic control are provided in Appendix E. VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION Trucks are expected to use CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 32/Ash Street to access the study area, then use the development driveways to reach the commercial area. Pedestrians and bicyclists, mainly residents in the proposed developments, are anticipated to use any available pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. Existing Traffic Volumes and Analysis Assumptions Traffic count data was collected through video at Intersections 1 through 5 on Thursday July 18th, 2024 from 6:00AM - 9:00AM, and from 3:30PM – 6:30PM. The actual High and Low temperatures for the collection day were 55° and 81°. All roadways were clear and dry. The morning (AM) peak hour of traffic for the study area occurred from 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM. The evening (PM) peak hour of traffic for the study area occurred from 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM. About 60% higher traffic volumes were observed during the weekday PM peak hour than the AM peak hour within the study boundary. Some cyclists and no pedestrians were recorded during the peak hours of traffic. Summary diagrams of the network’s peak hour vehicular traffic counts are provided in Appendix F. Using Synchro version 11.1, multiple delay computation methods are available, including the Percentile Delay Method, the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition methodology, Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Edition methodology, and Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition methodology. To analyze the traffic conditions within the study area for this report, Synchro version 11.1’s Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition delay method was utilized for all intersections. Intersections 1 – 5 were modeled. The resulting Synchro analysis worksheets were prepared for the existing conditions and are provided in Appendix G. Tables 1 – 5 show the existing level of service (LOS) and delay for Intersections 1 – 5 for both peak hour periods. In the existing condition, the southbound approach of Intersection 1 operate at a level of service F in both the AM and PM peak hours and all other movements operate at level of service D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 4 of 57 EXISTING (2024) CONDITION Table 1: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 1 8 3 97 18 141 13 75 26 356 210 10 Queue (ft) 41 58 46 46 41 187 Mvmt Delay (sec) 12.4 10.8 10.8 8.6 Mvmt LOS B B B A Delay (sec) 40.5 10.5 11.5 10.3 60.0 LOS E B B B F Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 18 30 9 54 13 354 19 238 174 329 189 11 Queue (ft) 40 41 117 86 62 404 Mvmt Delay (sec) 12.8 27 20.2 13.3 Mvmt LOS B D C B Delay (sec) 57.3 14.2 24.7 17.4 120.3 LOS F B C C F Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 5 of 57 Table 2: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 25 193 73 139 385 19 Queue (ft) 50 101 75 14 Mvmt Delay (sec) 15.4 13.8 8.7 0.2 Mvmt LOS C B A A Delay (sec) 4.4 14.0 3.1 0.0 LOS A B A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 51 295 192 405 282 22 Queue (ft) 87 142 70 0 Mvmt Delay (sec) 28.2 13.9 8.5 0.5 Mvmt LOS D B A A Delay (sec) 5.9 16.0 3.1 0.0 LOS A C A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 6 of 57 Table 3: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 200 5 7 80 9 20 Queue (ft) 22 48 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 9.9 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 339 14 13 197 6 11 Queue (ft) 29 37 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 11.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 7 of 57 Table 4: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 190 18 11 75 35 19 Queue (ft) 8 51 51 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 336 32 9 194 14 17 Queue (ft) 13 36 36 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.3 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.8 0.0 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 8 of 57 Table 5: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 17 192 107 5 12 26 Queue (ft) 8 53 53 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 79 353 194 16 14 18 Queue (ft) 35 37 37 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 9 of 57 Table 6: Existing (2024) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2024 EXISTING Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 41 12 Queue (ft) 31 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.4 7.3 8.4 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2024 EXISTING Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 43 57 Queue (ft) 41 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.9 7.3 8.5 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 10 of 57 Peak Hourly Factor For the area roadway system of this report, a single Peak Hourly Factor (PHF) was determined for each intersection with traffic count data. PHF was calculated by evaluating the collected traffic counts and comparing the intersection volume during the busiest 15-minutes of the peak hour with the total intersection volume during the peak hour. The PHF was applied to each intersection within Synchro 11 for all existing and future scenarios. Crash Analysis Crash data was obtained from Anoka County for the study area from 2019 to 2024, with the reports provided in Appendix H. A total of twenty-six crashes were recorded during this period. Table 7 summarizes these crashes. No crashes were recorded south of Intersection 2 or west of Intersection 3. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 11 of 57 Table 7: Crash Locations Most of the crashes occurred between 10:00AM to 6:00PM and were attributed to a variety of causes, including single vehicle run-off-road, rear end, other, and angle crash. The average crash rate for the CSAH 32/Ash Street segment from Intersection 2 to Intersection 3 is 1.52 crashes per MVMT, which is about 40% higher than the statewide average crash rate Anoka County highways, 1.09 per MVMT (MnDOT Crash Data Toolkits, Crash rates – CSAH and CR by County). The recorded crash data indicates a current need for geometric changes for CSAH 32/Ash Street between Monarch Way and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Existing traffic volumes were projected with the traffic forecast to create an Opening Year No Build (2025) future scenario and a Design Year No Build (2045) future scenario for the 6:30AM – 9:30AM and the 3:30PM – 6:30PM Weekday peak hours. Then, the proposed trip generation and trip distribution analyses were applied to No Build models to create an Opening Year Build (2025) future scenario and a Design Year Build (2045) future scenario for the Weekday AM and Weekday PM peak hours. Location Date Time Severity Diagram CSAH 32 (Ash St) & CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd)CSAH 21 2/5/2019 17:30 N Angle CSAH 21 8/20/2019 16:16 C Other CSAH 21 2/4/2019 10:16 N Other CSAH 21 10/1/2020 8:09 N SSO CSAH 21 9/8/2023 11:57 C Rear End CSAH 32 10/4/2019 16:00 N SSO CSAH 32 5/12/2021 15:19 N Angle CSAH 32 4/11/2022 17:34 N Angle CSAH 32 9/27/2023 13:03 N Other CSAH 32 1/28/2019 5:30 N SVROR CSAH 32 8/10/2019 12:37 N Rear End CSAH 32 10/4/2019 16:00 N SSO CSAH 32 5/2/2020 12:30 N Angle CSAH 32 10/23/2020 0:02 N SVROR CSAH 32 5/12/2021 15:19 N Angle CSAH 32 8/7/2021 12:07 C SSO CSAH 32 12/6/2021 10:20 N SVROR CSAH 32 12/10/2021 17:18 N SSO CSAH 32 1/22/2022 16:57 C SVROR CSAH 32 4/11/2022 17:34 N Angle CSAH 32 10/25/2022 5:19 N Other CSAH 32 12/17/2022 10:00 N SVROR CSAH 32 6/29/2023 20:35 N Other CSAH 32 9/27/2023 13:53 N Other CSAH 32 10/31/2023 2:30 N SVROR CSAH 32 12/9/2023 3:18 N SVROR CSAH 32 (Ash St) & CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd) to CSAH 32 (Ash St) & Monarch Way 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 12 of 57 Site Traffic TRIP GENERATION + SITE ACCESS Wilkinson Waters Development for the Wilkinson Waters area is anticipated to be complete in 2025. A preliminary plan has been provided for the Wilkinson Waters development. The Wilkinson Waters development plan was used to identify proposed access locations and to estimate trips generated by the parcel. The plan shows six 6-plex townhomes, four 4-plex townhomes, two 100-unit apartment buildings, one 100-unit senior housing facility, and three retail buildings with floor area ranging from 9,000 square feet to 11,000 square feet for each building. Parking lots are provided on-site for vehicular traffic, but no sidewalks or shared use paths are indicated in the preliminary and conceptual site plans. Internal development roadways would have low enough traffic volumes to allow for bicycles to share the roadway without on-street bicycle accommodations. The traffic generated by the Wilkinson Waters area is expected to be primarily new trips with some internally captured trips. For this study, a trip is defined as a one-way movement between an origin and a destination. The expected number of trips the Wilkinson Waters area will generate was estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The Wilkinson Area is best represented by the following ITE Trip Generation Manual’s Land Use Codes: • 215, Single-Family Attached Housing • 221, Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) – Not Close to Rail Transit • 252, Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily • 822, Strip Retail Plaza This area would have one access to Wilkinson Lake Boulevard and one access to Ash Street. No access to CSAH 21/Centerville Road is proposed. The access to Wilkinson Lake Boulevard is aligned to complement existing intersections. The access to Ash Street is located approximately 730 feet from the t-shaped intersection of Centerville Road and Ash Street / CSAH 32. This access point does not meet Anoka County’s access spacing criteria; however, due to the lower travel speeds anticipated in this section of Ash street, the presence of environmentally sensitive areas adjacent to the proposed access point, and the lack of desire to access the more heavily traveled CSAH 21/Centerville Road, the proposed access location is an appropriate location for this parcel. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 13 of 57 The number of new trips introduced by the Wilkinson development are summarized in Table 8 below. Table 8: Wilkinson Development Trip Generation for Opening Year 2025 Internal Capture Because the Wilkinson development will contain multiple land uses, an internal capture analysis was performed for the Wilkinson residential and retail land uses. The internal capture rate is the percentage reduction that can be applied to the trip generation estimates for individual land uses to account for trips internally absorbed. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd edition provides the methodology, and the internal capture rates for the AM and PM peak periods can be found in Appendix I. The internal capture ratios were applied to the values in Table 8 to create Table 9. Table 9: Wilkinson Development Trip Generation for Opening Year 2025 - Adjusted for Internal Capture North Oaks Farms Development for the North Oaks Farms area is anticipated to be complete by 2045. A concept plan has been prepared for the North Oaks Farms development, and the concept was used to estimate trips generated by the development. The concept shows detached single-family residences utilizing two access to Ash Street. The first access would be on the east side of the development where one new intersection between the two Ash Street 90-degree turns would provide access to 17 residences. The second access would be on the west side of the development and would add a north leg to the intersection of CSAH 21 / Ash Street and Monarch Way. Total New Trips Entering Exiting Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)224 93 131 Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator)350 149 201 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)447 237 210 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Generator)532 295 237 Weekday 3054 1527 1527 Total New Trips Entering Exiting Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)222 92 130 Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator)348 148 200 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)343 185 158 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Generator)428 243 185 Weekday 3054 1527 1527 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 14 of 57 The expected number of trips the North Oaks Farms area will generate was estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The North Oaks Farms area is best represented by the following ITE Trip Generation Manual’s Land Use Code 210, Single- Family Detached Housing. The traffic generated by the North Oaks Farms area is expected to be all new trips. The number of new trips introduced by the North Oaks Farms development is summarized in Table 10 below. Table 10: North Oaks Farms Trip Generation Combined Trip Generation The number of new trips introduced by the North Oaks Farms development was added to the Wilkinson development’s new trips adjusted for internal capture to create a combined trip generation for 2045, summarized in Table 11 below. Table 11: Trip Generation for Design Year 2045 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT It is assumed that the proposed development’s trips would follow similar traffic patterns as the existing traffic within the study area. Proposed traffic is expected to be distributed similar to the existing traffic distribution with variations between the two developments. The existing traffic distribution is comparable during both the AM and the PM peak hours for each development with minor variations. A visual of the anticipated trip distribution for entering and exiting new trips for the developments is provided in Appendix J. These trip distributions were applied to the expected traffic generated by the proposed development. A visual summary of the trip assignment for the Opening Year (2025) and Design Year (2045) is provided in Appendix K. The proposed development is expected to increase traffic for many left- and right-turn movements at Intersections 1 – 3 and through movements at Intersections 4 and 5. MODAL SPLIT Some cyclists and no pedestrians were recorded during the peak hour of traffic. Bicyclists and pedestrians, mainly development residents, are anticipated to use available bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Pedestrians and bicyclists who are not residents of the proposed developments may be attracted the proposed developments in the future if pedestrian and bicyclist friendly design elements are incorporated into site plans for area development and once a sidewalk or shared use path network is constructed by the City of Lino Lakes along Ash Street. Total New Trips Entering Exiting Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)55 14 41 Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator)58 15 43 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)72 45 27 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Generator)76 49 27 Weekday 736 368 368 Total New Trips Entering Exiting Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)279 107 172 Weekday AM (AM Peak Hour of Generator)408 164 244 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic)519 282 237 Weekday PM (PM Peak Hour of Generator)608 344 264 Weekday 3790 1895 1895 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 15 of 57 Growth Rate Selected growth rates vary by segment. Several sources were considered when selecting the study growth rates, including historical roadway traffic, historical population growth, historical household growth, and recently completed background growth rate calculations for intersection control evaluation reports. These sources are explored below. ROADWAY HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE Average annual daily traffic (AADT) estimates are available through the MNDOT Traffic Mapping Application. Existing AADT counts from various years between 2003 and 2022 along CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 were analyzed. This data was reviewed for variability and growth trends. It should be noted that traffic counts reflecting changes related to the pandemic of 2020 were not included in the analysis. The growth rate was back calculated using the historical traffic counts along Ash Street in the study area using the following equation: Equation 1 𝐹=𝐶(1 +�ℎ)𝑛 𝑤�𝑎𝑟𝑎: 𝐶=𝑟�𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑟 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝑇 𝐹=𝑟�𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝑇 �ℎ=𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑙𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑤𝑟� �ℎ𝑙 𝑎𝑎𝑎�ℎ𝑙𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑙 𝑙=𝑙𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑎𝑟 𝑙𝑎 𝑦𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑤𝑎𝑎𝑙 𝐶 𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐹 The results are shown in bellow in Figure 1 and 2 and Table 12 and 13. In the past 20 years, traffic volumes have varied on both highways, increasing overall by 0.7% annually along CSAH 21 and decreasing overall by -0.2% annually along CSAH 32. Figure 1: Historical AADT along CSAH 32 / Ash Street 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 AA D T Year Historical AADT Growth CSAH 32 9,000 9,500 10,000 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 13,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 AA D T Year Historical AADT Growth CSAH 21 Figure 2: Historical AADT along CSAH 21 / Centerville Rd 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 16 of 57 Table 13: Historical AADT along CSAH 32 / Ash Street CITY OF LINO LAKES POPULATION GROWTH The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan for 2040 study reviewed the City of Lino Lake’s population growth for variability and trends. US Census data, recorded every 10 years from 1990 through 2020, was used to calculate the city's annualized growth rate, which averaged 1.43% annually between 2000 and 2020. According to the "City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan," adopted in 2020, the population is projected to increase by approximately 3,800 people between 2020 and 2030 and by an additional 4,900 people between 2030 and 2040. Future population estimates vary; however, a conservative future population growth rate of 1.68% annually is being used by the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan for 2040. Figure 3. Historical Lino Lakes Population Year AADT Annualized Growth Year AADT Annualized 2003 6,200 2003 11,200 2005 5,600 -5.0%2005 10,800 -1.8% 2007 5,900 2.6%2007 10,900 0.5% 2009 5,300 -5.2%2009 11,400 2.3% 2011 4,800 -4.8%2011 10,700 -3.1% 2012 5,300 10.4%2012 10,800 0.9% 2014 5,100 -1.9%2014 10,500 -1.4% 2016 5,400 2.9%2016 11,700 5.6% 2018 5,500 0.9%2018 11,100 -2.6% 2022 5,100 -1.9%2019 12,400 11.7% Average Growth -0.2%2022 10,707 -4.8% Average Growth -0.2% CSAH 32 / Ash St (West of Intersection 2)CSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Between Intersections 1 & 2) Historical AADT Growth Historical AADT Growth 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Pe o p l e Year Historical Lino Lakes Population Table 12: Historical AADT along CSAH 21 / Centerville Rd 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 17 of 57 Table 14: Historical Lino Lakes Population Growth Population Growth Lino Lakes Year People Annualized Growth 1990 8807 6.7% 2000 16791 1.9% 2010 20216 1.0% 2020 22300 Average Growth (1990-2020) 3.15% Average Growth (2000-2020) 1.43% CITY OF LINO LAKES HOUSEHOLD GROWTH The "City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan" study also analyzed the household growth. The City of Lino Lakes’ household has grown about 1.84% annually between 2000 and 2020. Future population estimates vary; however, a conservative future household growth rate of 2.10% annually is being used by the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan for 2040. According to the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan and included 2040 Utility Stating Plan, much of the growth will follow sanitary sewer and municipal water service extensions planned along Ash Street within the project area and to the west and along Main Street / CSAH 14 in the northwest part of the City. Table 15: Historical Lino Lakes Household Household Growth Lino Lakes Year People Annualized Growth 1990 2603 6.4% 2000 4857 2.4% 2010 6174 1.3% 2020 7000 Average Growth (1990-2020) 3.35% Average Growth (2000-2020) 1.84% INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATIONS Average annual daily traffic (AADT) estimates and the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) reports for Intersections 1 and 2 were provided by Anoka County. In the ICE reports, 2019 traffic was projected to 2040 and then reported as 2045 volumes. The growth rates for used in the report, calculating using Equation 1, were selected for study roadways: • 1.0% for CSAH 21/Centerville Road south of Intersection 1 (Existing AADT: 5,200; Build 2045 AADT: 7,100) • 1.4% for CSAH 21/Centerville Road between Intersections 1 and 2 (Existing AADT: 12,400; Build 2045 AADT: 17,600) • 1.4% for CSAH J/Ash Street east of Intersection 1 (Existing AADT: 12,000; Build 2045 AADT: 17,100) • 0.9% for CSAH 21/Centerville Road north of Intersection 2 (Existing AADT: 7,100; Build 2045 AADT: 9,000) • 1.5% for CSAH 32/Ash Street west of Intersection 2 (Existing AADT: 5,500; Build 2045 AADT: 8,000) 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 18 of 57 The ICE reports, completed in November 2023, assessed the 2026 construction of roundabouts for each intersection. The reports attached a traffic forecasts memorandum, which summarizes methodology, assumptions, and daily traffic forecast results for the study area’s major roadways. The traffic forecasts were developed based on MET Council’s Activity Based Model. The Wilkinson and North Oaks Farms developments both lie within Metro Council TAZ 165. Metro Council TAZs 165 and 1755 both influence the selected traffic growth rate at the intersection of CSAH 32 and Centerville Road. The details of both Metro TAZs are reported below. Households Retail Jobs Non-Retail Jobs Total Jobs TAZ 2018 2040 Change % 2018 2040 Change % 2018 2040 Change % 2018 2040 Change % 165 366 726 98% 0 17 N/A 37 45 22% 37 62 68% 1755 394 352 -11% 0 10 N/A 25 50 100% 25 60 140% Total 760 1078 42% 0 27 N/A 62 95 53% 62 122 51% This Metro Council data was compared to the anticipated number of households and retail jobs introduced to the area as a result of proposed development. Households Total Jobs Metro Council Data TAZ 165 + TAZ 1755 (Total) 2040 1078 122 After Proposed Development TAZ 165 + TAZ 1755 (Total) 2018 + Proposed Development 760 + 427 = 1187 62 + 35 = 97 The proposed development would introduce more households and less jobs to the area than anticipated by the Metro Council by 2045. Much of the traffic growth generated by the proposed development has been captured in the growth rates identified in the traffic forecast memorandum. This would warrant reducing growth rates reported in the ICE reports, with the most reduction to the growth rate for CSAH 32 / Ash Street. SELECTED BACKGROUND GROWTH RATES The background growth rates for this report is used to add traffic to the roadways. Several sources, including the Comprehensive Plan 2040 and ICE reports, considers development of the proposed site in forecasts. The background growth rate was selected considering all available sources, adjusting where needed when area development has previously been built into forecasts. A review of available sources is provided in Table 16, and a table of selected growth rates is provided as Table 17 . 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 19 of 57 Table 16: Growth Rate Sources Source Growth Rate Historical Traffic Growth CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (south of Intersection 1) 0.1% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (between Intersections 1 and 2) -0.2% CSAH J / Ash Street (east of intersection 1) 1.9% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (north of Intersection 2) -0.2% CSAH 32 / Ash Street (west of Intersection 2) -0.2% Comprehensive Plan 2040 Anticipated Population Growth 1.68% Anticipated Household Growth 2.10% ICE Reports CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (south of Intersection 1) 1.0% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (between Intersections 1 and 2) 1.4% CSAH J / Ash Street (east of intersection 1) 1.4% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (north of Intersection 2) 0.9% CSAH 32 / Ash Street (west of Intersection 2) 1.5% Table 17: Selected Growth Rates Roadway Growth Rate CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (south of Intersection 1) 0.5% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (between Intersections 1 and 2) 1.0% CSAH J / Ash Street (east of intersection 1) 1.0% CSAH 21 / Centerville Road (north of Intersection 2) 0.8% CSAH 32 / Ash Street (west of Intersection 2) 0% 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 20 of 57 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS Capacity and Level of Service at Studied Intersections – AM and PM Peak Hours The existing traffic was analyzed to estimate the trip distribution of the generated trips for the proposed development, including pass-by and non-pass-by trips. The expected proposed trip distribution was applied to the anticipated trip generation for the development. The assigned trips, represented in an exhibit in Appendix K, were added to future No Build scenarios to create future Build scenarios. Each intersection was analyzed within Synchro (HCM 6th Edition delay method) for capacity and LOS for the following future scenarios: • Opening Year No Build (2025) • Opening Year Build (2025) • Design Year No Build (2045) • Design Year Build (2045) The tables on the following pages summarize the movement volumes, level of service, and delay for each of the above future scenario. Diagrams of anticipated turning movement volumes for the future scenarios are provided in Appendix L as visual reference, and Synchro analysis modeling results for each of the above future scenarios are provided in Appendices M – P. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 21 of 57 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD (2025) CONDITION Table 18: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 1 8 3 98 18 142 13 75 26 360 212 10 Queue (ft) 40 63 46 70 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.9 7.4 5.3 5.6 9.6 LOS A A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 18 30 9 55 13 358 19 139 175 332 191 11 Queue (ft) 34 79 133 68 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 9.2 6.0 9.0 11.1 8.0 LOS A A A B A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 22 of 57 Table 19: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 25 193 74 140 388 19 Queue (ft) 78 78 19 48 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 6.1 7.3 4.4 6.4 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 51 295 194 409 284 22 Queue (ft) 127 127 57 66 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.6 7.8 8.3 6.2 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 23 of 57 Table 20: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 200 5 7 80 9 20 Queue (ft) 6 46 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 10.1 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 39 14 13 197 6 11 Queue (ft) 31 39 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 24 of 57 Table 21: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 190 18 11 75 35 19 Queue (ft) 26 52 52 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 336 32 9 194 14 17 Queue (ft) 19 38 38 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.3 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.8 0.0 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 25 of 57 Table 22: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 17 192 107 5 12 26 Queue (ft) 18 53 53 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 79 353 194 16 14 18 Queue (ft) 73 44 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 26 of 57 Table 23: Opening Year No Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 41 12 Queue (ft) 30 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.4 7.3 8.4 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR NO BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 43 57 Queue (ft) 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.9 7.3 8.5 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 27 of 57 OPENING YEAR BUILD (2025) CONDITION Table 24: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 7 59 43 98 55 142 44 75 26 360 212 19 Queue (ft) 41 70 50 74 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 9.3 9.8 6.0 6.8 11.5 LOS A A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 48 93 40 55 66 358 70 239 175 332 191 39 Queue (ft) 34 79 133 68 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 12.1 8.3 11.9 15.8 10.3 LOS B A B C B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 28 of 57 Table 25: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 29 193 74 146 397 20 Queue (ft) 84 84 21 64 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 6.2 7.4 4.5 6.5 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 57 295 194 439 312 28 Queue (ft) 127 127 57 66 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 8.1 8.3 8.8 6.6 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 29 of 57 Table 26: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 213 5 7 106 9 20 Queue (ft) 0 45 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.0 0.0 0.5 10.3 LOS A B A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 384 14 13 224 6 11 Queue (ft) 31 39 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.2 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.4 12.7 LOS A A B A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 30 of 57 Table 27: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 190 18 11 75 35 19 Queue (ft) 25 50 50 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 336 32 9 194 14 17 Queue (ft) 19 38 38 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.3 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.8 0.0 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 31 of 57 Table 28: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 17 192 107 5 12 26 Queue (ft) 21 58 58 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A B A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 79 353 194 16 14 18 Queue (ft) 73 44 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 32 of 57 Table 29: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 97 0 41 77 0 12 Queue (ft) 32 32 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.8 0.0 2.6 8.8 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 124 0 43 132 0 57 Queue (ft) 43 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.6 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 2.4 0.0 1.9 9.2 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 33 of 57 Table 30: Opening Year Build (2025) LOS and Delay for Intersection 7 INTERSECTION 7 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 218 0 1 92 0 4 Queue (ft) Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.7 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.1 9.5 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2025 OPENING YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 346 0 6 214 0 6 Queue (ft) Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.2 10.4 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 34 of 57 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD (2045) CONDITION Table 31: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 1 8 3 120 22 174 14 83 29 439 259 10 Queue (ft) 22 60 60 110 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 10.6 8.8 6.0 6.4 13.5 LOS B A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 18 30 9 67 16 436 21 264 193 405 233 14 Queue (ft) 40 121 147 106 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 11.9 7.0 11.7 14.8 10.3 LOS B A B B B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 35 of 57 Table 32: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 25 193 90 171 455 22 Queue (ft) 76 76 16 67 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 6.9 8.0 4.8 7.4 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 51 295 237 499 333 26 Queue (ft) 107 107 56 50 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 9.2 8.5 10.5 7.4 LOS A A B A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 36 of 57 Table 33: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 200 5 7 80 9 20 Queue (ft) 9 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 10.1 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 339 14 13 197 6 11 Queue (ft) 23 51 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 37 of 57 Table 34: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 190 18 11 75 35 19 Queue (ft) 14 44 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 336 32 9 194 14 17 Queue (ft) 13 52 52 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.3 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.8 0.0 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 38 of 57 Table 35: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 17 192 107 5 12 26 Queue (ft) 11 43 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 79 353 194 16 14 18 Queue (ft) 45 41 41 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 39 of 57 Table 36: Design Year No Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 46 12 Queue (ft) 33 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.4 7.3 8.4 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR NO BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 51 57 Queue (ft) 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.9 7.3 8.5 LOS A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 40 of 57 DESIGN YEAR BUILD (2045) CONDITION Table 37: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 1 INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 7 59 43 120 59 178 45 84 29 452 265 19 Queue (ft) 22 60 60 110 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 13.7 12.5 6.8 8.0 18.3 LOS A B A A C Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 48 93 40 67 69 445 72 269 193 414 238 42 Queue (ft) 54 127 133 133 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 17.8 10.4 17.2 24.8 14.8 LOS C B C C B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 41 of 57 Table 38: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 2 INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 31 212 95 177 464 24 Queue (ft) 76 76 16 67 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 7.1 8.7 4.9 7.6 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 58 309 251 529 361 35 Queue (ft) 113 113 79 70 Mvmt Delay (sec) Mvmt LOS Delay (sec) 10.2 9.3 11.6 8.1 LOS B A B A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 42 of 57 Table 39: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 3 INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 6 215 5 7 110 5 9 0 20 17 0 16 Queue (ft) 9 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A A A Delay (sec) 1.8 0.2 0.5 10.4 10.6 LOS A A A B B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 23 390 14 13 226 13 6 0 11 12 0 9 Queue (ft) 9 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 8.2 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A A A Delay (sec) 1.1 0.4 0.4 13.3 14.3 LOS A A A B B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 43 of 57 Table 40: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 4 INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 198 18 11 95 35 19 Queue (ft) 14 44 44 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.7 0.0 0.8 10.6 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 365 32 9 205 14 17 Queue (ft) 14 38 38 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.4 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.7 0.0 0.4 12.4 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 44 of 57 Table 41: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 5 INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 17 200 126 6 12 26 Queue (ft) 11 43 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.6 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.3 0.6 0.0 10.0 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 79 381 204 17 15 18 Queue (ft) 50 43 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.9 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 13.2 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 45 of 57 Table 42: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 6 INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 97 0 46 77 0 12 Queue (ft) 33 33 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.5 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 2.8 8.8 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 124 0 51 132 0 57 Queue (ft) 43 43 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.6 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 2.5 0.0 2.1 9.2 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 46 of 57 Table 43: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 7 INTERSECTION 7 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 239 0 1 98 0 4 Queue (ft) Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.1 0.0 0.1 9.6 LOS A A A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 361 0 6 231 0 6 Queue (ft) Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.2 10.5 LOS A A A B Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 47 of 57 Table 44: Design Year Build (2045) LOS and Delay for Intersection 8 INTERSECTION 8 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 4 4 237 2 1 92 Queue (ft) 0 0 Mvmt Delay (sec) 7.8 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.3 10.2 0.0 0.1 LOS A B A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). INTERSECTION 8 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 2045 DESIGN YEAR BUILD CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (veh) 2 3 362 6 4 223 Queue (ft) 0 0 Mvmt Delay (sec) 8.1 0.0 Mvmt LOS A A Delay (sec) 0.1 11.7 0.0 0.1 LOS A B A A Source: Data was analyzed using Synchro (HCM 6th Edition) and Sim Traffic (queue). 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 48 of 57 LEVEL OF SERVICE AND DELAY COMPARISON Table 45: Intersection 1 Scenario Comparison Intersection 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 40.5 40.5 11.5 10.3 60.0 LOS E E B B F 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 7.9 7.9 5.3 5.6 9.6 LOS A A A A A 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 9.3 9.3 6.0 6.8 11.5 LOS A A A A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 10.6 10.6 6.0 6.4 13.5 LOS B B A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 13.7 13.7 6.8 8.0 18.3 LOS A A A A C Intersection 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH J/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 57.3 57.3 24.7 17.4 120.3 LOS F F C C F 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 9.2 9.2 9.0 11.1 8.0 LOS A A A B A 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 12.1 12.1 11.9 15.8 10.3 LOS B B B C B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 11.9 11.9 11.7 14.8 10.3 LOS B B B B B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 17.8 17.8 17.2 24.8 14.8 LOS C C C C B 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 49 of 57 Table 46: Intersection 2 Scenario Comparison Intersection 2 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 4.4 14.0 3.1 0.0 LOS A B A A 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 6.1 7.3 4.4 6.4 LOS A A A A 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 6.2 7.4 4.5 6.5 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 6.9 8.0 4.8 7.4 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 7.1 8.7 4.9 7.6 LOS A A A A Intersection 2 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 5.9 16.0 3.1 0.0 LOS A C A A 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 7.6 7.8 8.3 6.2 LOS A A A A 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 8.1 8.3 8.8 6.6 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 9.2 8.5 10.5 7.4 LOS A A B A 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 10.2 9.3 11.6 8.1 LOS B A B A 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 50 of 57 Table 47: Intersection 3 Scenario Comparison Intersection 3 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 9.9 LOS A A A A 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 10.1 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 1.0 0.0 0.5 10.3 LOS A B A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.1 0.0 0.6 10.1 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.8 0.2 0.5 10.4 10.6 LOS A A A B B Intersection 3 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Monarch Way Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 11.6 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 12.0 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.4 12.7 LOS A A B A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 0.5 0.0 0.5 12.0 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.1 0.4 0.4 13.3 14.3 LOS A A A B B 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 51 of 57 Table 48: Intersection 4 Scenario Comparison Intersection 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 1.9 1.9 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.9 1.9 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 1.9 1.9 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.9 1.9 1.0 10.5 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.7 1.7 0.8 10.6 LOS A A A B Intersection 4 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Rapp Farm Blvd Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 0.8 0.8 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 0.8 0.8 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 0.8 0.8 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 0.8 0.8 0.4 12.0 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 0.7 0.7 0.4 12.4 LOS A A A B 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 52 of 57 Table 49: Intersection 5 Scenario Comparison Intersection 5 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A B A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.4 0.6 0.0 9.8 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.3 0.6 0.0 10.0 LOS A A A B Intersection 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Drive N Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.6 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.5 1.4 0.0 13.2 LOS A A A B 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 53 of 57 Table 50: Intersection 6 Scenario Comparison Intersection 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 1.8 0.0 2.6 8.8 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 1.9 0.0 2.8 8.8 LOS A A A A Intersection 6 WEEKDAY PM PEAK Wilkinson Lake Blvd & South Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 2.4 0.0 1.9 9.2 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 2.5 0.0 2.1 9.2 LOS A A A A 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 54 of 57 Table 51: Intersection 7 Scenario Comparison Intersection 7 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.1 9.5 LOS A A A A 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 0.1 0.0 0.1 9.6 LOS A A A A Intersection 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & North Access Wilkinson Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.2 10.4 LOS A A A B 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 0.2 0.0 0.2 10.5 LOS A A A B 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 55 of 57 Table 52: Intersection 8 Scenario Comparison Intersection 8 WEEKDAY AM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 0.3 10.2 0.0 0.1 LOS A B A A Intersection 8 WEEKDAY PM PEAK CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Overall Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing (2024) Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2025 Opening Year Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year No Build Delay (sec) LOS 2045 Design Year Build Delay (sec) 0.1 11.7 0.0 0.1 LOS A B A A Principal Findings As background traffic volumes, calculated using existing traffic volumes and assumed growth rates, increase, delay for most movements is expected to increase. The construction of the planned roundabouts improves operations at Intersections 1 and 2. All movements will experience a level of service of C or better at the study intersections in the future scenarios. RIGHT-TURN WARRANT NCHRP 457 methodology is utilized for the right-turn bay analysis. The warrant determines the need for a right-turn lane based on the major roadway speed, the number of travel lanes, the volume along the major roadway, and the total amount of right- turning vehicles from the major roadway. The need for the following right-turn lanes were evaluated: • Eastbound right-turn lane at the Wilkinson area’s North Access (Intersection 7) 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 56 of 57 • Northbound right-turn lane at the North Oaks Farms area’s East Access (Intersection 8) • Westbound right-turn lane at Monarch Way (Intersection 3) • Eastbound right-turn lane at Monarch Way (Intersection 3) • Westbound right-turn lane at Holly Drive (Intersection 5) None of the above additional right-turn lanes are warranted. Right-turn lane warrant figures that plot expected traffic conditions against warrant curves are provided in the Appendix Q. LEFT-TURN WARRANT NCHRP 457 methodology is also utilized for the left-turn bay analysis. The warrant determines the need of a left-turn lane base on the major roadway speed, the number of travel lanes, the volume along the major roadway, and the total amount of left-turning vehicles from the major roadway. The need for the following left-turn lanes were evaluated: • Westbound left-turn lane at the Wilkinson area’s North Access (Intersection 7) • Southbound left-turn lane at the North Oaks Farms area’s East Access (Intersection 8) • Westbound left-turn lane at Monarch Way (Intersection 3) • Eastbound left-turn lane at Monarch Way (Intersection 3) • Eastbound left-turn lane at Holly Drive (Intersection 5) The results of the warrant analysis is summarized in Table 53 below, and left-turn lane warrant figures that plot expected traffic conditions against warrant curves are provided in the Appendix R. Table 53: Left-Turn Lane Warrant Summary Existing 2024 Design Year 2045 Build Westbound left-turn at Intersection 7 N/A Not Warranted Southbound left-turn at Intersection 8 N/A Not Warranted Westbound left-turn at Intersection 3 N/A Not Warranted Eastbound left-turn at Intersection 3 Not Warranted Not Warranted Eastbound left-turn at Intersection 5 Warranted Warranted 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Page 57 of 57 CONCLUSIONS + RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed residential and mixed-use developments along Ash Street in Anoka County may start operations as early as 2025 and is anticipated to be fully developed by 2045. The development area, 116 acres total, includes the Wilkinson development and the North Oaks Farms development. The proposed development will include new accesses to the CSAH 32/Ash Street and one access point to Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, a private roadway. In the existing condition the southbound approach to the intersection CSAH 21 / Centerville Rd and CSAH J/Ash Street is operating at a level of service F. All other movements are operation at a level of service D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. With the planned reconstructions of CSH 21/Centerville Rd’s intersections with CSAH J/Ash Street and CSAH 32/Ash Street from stop- controlled intersections to roundabouts, level of service improves. Level of service at all approaches in the future scenarios are a level of service C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. An eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and Holly Drive is warranted in all scenarios, including the existing scenario. Although a left-turn lane is warranted, there have been no recorded crashes at that intersection during the time periods reviewed, and therefore constructing a left-turn lane at the Holly Drive is not required due to safety. No other right- or left- turn lanes are warranted. Anoka County is considering Ash Street for realignment. Higher than average crash rates along CSAH 32/Ash Street between Monarch Way and CSAH 21/Centerville Road indicates a need for roadway geometry changes. Roadway realignment should be designed with horizontal geometry, vertical geometry, and superelevation meeting standards provided in AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, current edition. A suggested design speed is 45 MPH to provide a transition between the 50 MPH posted speed limit section to the west on CSAH 32/Ash Street and the roundabout at the intersection of CSAH 32/Ash Street and CSAH 21/Centerville Road. This suggested speed limit would also be consistent with the current speed zone per the Anoka County highway speed zone map. A suggested maximum design superelevation rate (emax) is 6%. Highway easements should be incorporated into proposed development plans for the County’s future use for roadway realignment. The proposed developments should incorporate sidewalks and/or shared use paths within the developments to provide pedestrian and bicyclist connectivity between residences, retail, the planned sidewalk and trail network along CSAH 32/Ash Street and CSAH 21/Centerville Rd, and the future CSAH 32/Ash Street roadway. The planned intersection geometry and traffic control is sufficient to accommodate the opening year and design year vehicular traffic. After the construction of the development, this report recommends that the study area be re-evaluated if growth projections change. 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix A Appendix A: Wilkinson Preliminary Plan and North Oaks Farms Site Concept 10 0 U N I T A P A R T M E N T 24 12 PR O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 29 10 20 9 19 10 5 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6 - P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 3 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 4- P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4- P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4- P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 9 16 6- P L E X 11 , 2 5 6 S Q . F T . 36 RETAIL 9,100 SQ. FT. RE T A I L 9,10 0 SQ . F T . RE T A I L 10 , 8 5 0 S Q . F T . 31 32 1 0 0 U N I T S E N I O R L I V I N G 4- P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . 4- P L E X 7, 8 4 0 S Q . F T . WILKINSON LAKE BLVD >> >> >> WILKINSON LAKE INV 894.60 INV 893.98 40"± RCP ELEC WILKINSON LAKE WILKINSON LAKE > > > > > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > <II <II<II<II<II <II <II<II<II<II <II <II <II <II <II<II<II<II<II > > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE E X I S T I N G P O N D NW L = X 1 0 0 Y R H W L = X I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T W E T WE T WET 1.47 mphFastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFOMB V O H L V OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G G G G FB O FB O FB O FB O U EX GGV OHL OHL G OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L UUG UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM STM exposed storm pipe OHL OHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE > > > > > <II<II<II<II<II <II <II <II<II<II <II EX SAN MHR=912.07?I=896.35? 100 UN I T A P A R T M E N T 15 29 11 26 16 17 21 ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\30671 CONCEPT 7A.DWG SAVED BY: JAMIE.STEINBORN CONCEPT 7A N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 07/22/2024 60' RIGHT OF WAY 15' PARKING SETBACK 40' BUILDING SETBACK 300' OWL SETBACK (WILKINSON LAKE) 300' OWL SETBACK (AMELIA LAKE) 1000' SHORELAND OVERLAY (AMELIA LAKE) 1000' SHORELAND OVERLAY (WILKINSON LAKE) WET WET WET W E T W E T W E T WET WET WE T W E T WET W E T W E T WET WET WE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T WE T WE T WE T G G I=895.23 I=895.22 OHL OHL STM STM STM STM OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL W W W W W W W W W W WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WET WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 50 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN34-31-22-43-0012 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST.34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC34-31-22-34-0001 10 0 ' 60' 60 ' 80'65' 130' 60 ' 60' 60 ' 65 ' 80' 130' ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\NORTH OAKS FARMS\30671 NORTH OAKS FARMS CONCEPT 1.DWG SAVED BY: LOGAN.HARMS ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 NORTH OAKS FARMS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/02/24 CONCEPT 1 N0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 WETWET 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix B Appendix B: Project Location Map T31NR22W ")49 ")84 ")249 ")53 ")81 ")4A")140 56554 56514 5658 56549 56560 56523 5654 56523 5651 56521 56534 56514 56559 56512 56532 Lino Lakes §¨¦35 §¨¦35E §¨¦35W §¨¦35W §¨¦35E 123456 7 8 9 10 11 12 131415161718 19 20 21 22 23 24 252627282930 31 32 33 34 35 36 1 12 13 24 25 36 31 32 33 34 35 3636 2345612 6 7 18 19 30 31 31 Anoka Washington AnokaRamsey AnokaAnokaCountyCounty IsantiCounty ChisagoCountySherburneCounty WrightCounty AnokaCounty WashingtonCounty HennepinCounty RamseyCounty AnokaAnokaCountyCounty 0 0.90.45 Miles ¯Project Location Map Wilkinson Water DevelopmentAnoka County, Minnesota1 in = 1 miles Thursday, July 11, 2024 Source(s):Municipalities (MN DOT, 6/24/2016)Lakes (MN DNR, July, 2008)Counties (MN DNR, July 2013)PLSS (MnGeo/USGS) Project Number 24-30671S:\Projects\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 Lino Lakes DevelopmentMaster P-Lino Lakes MN\30671 Production Files\30671 GIS\30671 MapDocs\30671 Location Map.mxd 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix C Appendix C: Intersection Map H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION MAP N LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 1 2 345 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix D Appendix D: Existing Zoning and Future Land Use Maps LacasseCourt CedarStW LacasseCircle KilldeerDrive DelinaCircle PonyCourt GlenCircle AlbertCourt RedHawkTrail VelvetleafLane LamotteDrShadowCourt AquaCir PintoLane ElmcrestAveN FoxCove BehmLane KellySt OakviewCourt MustangCourt ArabianCircle TecklaCourt BlackDuckCourt EvaSt TrappersCourt GrayHeronDrive MuskratRun JosephCourt HighlandCourt WoodDuckTrail CoyoteCourt MallardLane StagecoachTrl TartCourt CarpenterPlace TownCenter Parkway GladstoneCircle PeregrineCircle FloraCourt SiouxLane PalominoLane SouthGlenTrail CassiopeiaCourt LeaCourt CaribouCircle TerraCourt AppaloosaCourt ParkCt OakCourt TeleLane 20thAveS SnowOwlCircle RiceCourt TimberwolfTrailBlackDuckCircle 81stStW PondviewCircle ApolloCt TrappersCrossingS JamesStreet PostRoad SunflowerLane PartridgeCourt LoisLane GordonAvenueN CenturyTrl ShetlandLn PaintedTurtleRoad EgretLane BloomCourt LindaCourt DurangoPoint NorthernLightsBlvd ChokecherryRoad RohavicLane HeatherCourtN SchlavinCourt 4thAve 2ndAvenue AntelopeDrive SheliaAve MourningDoveRoad OakHollowLane KingfisherCourt SherwoodLane GlenviewAvenue BuckthornLane ParkviewDrive DanubeStreet ElmStreet SunriseRoad FoxRoad DianeStreet CherokeeTrail OspreyCourt DeerPassTrail StellaLane RiceLakeCourt BeaverCircle RavensCourt RoyalPinesPlace TomahawkTrail BeaverTrail TotemTrail BarbaraLane 4thAve ArthurCt MerganserCourt LanternLane WhitetailTrail MorganLn CanfieldRoad OakwoodDrive TamarackLane WoodchuckCourt LoisLane PrairieFlowerRoad GreenwoodLane RedBirchCourt WhiteBirchCourt PraireViewPlace LanternCircle HollyDriveN BlackDuckDriveS MeadowCourt OakwoodLane PineSt ElmStreet ElmcrestAveN RedCloverLane IversonCourt SmoketreeLane WildflowerDrive BradleyStreet CenturyTrl FairmontDrive MainSt 74thStreet RuffedGrouseRoad TeleDrive 2ndAvenue BlueHeronDrive AspenLane PalominoLane GladstoneDrive TealCourt GlenviewDrive PeltierLakeDrive HollowLane JonAvenue ConnieLane HighlandTrail NordinSt HudsonTrail LaureneAvenue BirchCourt WareRoad RondeauLakeRdW ForshamLakeDrive BlackDuckDrive WildTurkeyTrail 64thStreet PartridgePlace StellaCircle HollyDriveE WhiteOwlDrive CedarStE ShermanLakeRoad SiouxLookout CoyoteTrail 77thStreetW MarciaLane 65thStreet BlackbirdLane LakotaTrl ChippewaTrail 79thStreetW LacasseDrive MyrtleLane RiverBirchPlace CarlStreet MolitorDr RusticLane CrippleCreekPass AndallStreet MustangLane TrappersXingN WoodsEdgeBlvd FawnLane WareRoad FoxtailCourt HokahDrive HighlandDrive CountryLane ArloLane WoodchuckCircle GlenviewLane LamotteCir GaageLane KellySt OakLane ShadowLakeDriveW WhiteOakRoad LonesomePine Trail ElbeStreetNE SunriseRoad ReilingRoad BluebillLane BaldwinLakeRd SandhillDrive LilacSt TimberwolfTrail GreenBriarDrive SargentCourtN TartLakeRoad MapleSt UlmerDrive HokahDrive LindaAvenue ClearwaterCreekDr MarshanLane FoxtailDrive PheasantRunS 62ndSt HuntersRidge DeerwoodLane OrangeSt KnollDrive 81stStE LindaLane AugustCircle OjibwayPa RedMapleLane AenonPlace FoxRoad TalleLane PheasantHillsDrive EvergreenTrail FoxCircle ArrowheadDrive BaldEagleBoulevard NancyDrive CountyRdJ Villiage Drive 12thAveS AppaloosaLane WhitePineRoad KarthRoad ClearwaterCreekDr DeerwoodLane JeanneDrive 81stStE 77thStreetW OliveSt PattiDrive MarilynDrive LakeviewDrive JaneAve SunriseDrive LindenLane PhelpsRoad NottinghamLane LakeviewDrive WhippoorwillLane HickoryPlace CrystalCourt VickyLane RondeauLakeRdW ThomasStreet OtterLakeDrive HenryLane StallionLane SnowOwlLane 4thAve Woodland Drive PelicanPlace EllenCourt BaldEagleBoulevard CountryLakesDrive WoodridgeLane TimothyCt 2ndAvenue WareRoad MeadowviewTrail CaroleDrive LindaCircle RondeauLake RdE MarketPlaceDrive RedFoxRd RobinsonDr ShermanLakeRoad ShadowLake DriveW StoneybrookDrive PineSt BlackDuckDrive RollingHillsDrive RondeauLakeRdE LangerLane LeonardAvenue RiceLakeLane RiceLakeDrive DianeCourt HollyCourtE ApolloDr ServiceRoad MarvyStreet JoyerLane HawthornRoad RehbeinStreet 77thStreetE ShadowLakeDriveE OakLane OldBirchStreet 62ndStN ElmcrestAveN CountyRd53 4thAve VaughanCourt WoodDuckTrail ShadowLakeDriveW HollyDriveN 4thAve HollyDriveE AquaLn MeadowviewCourt MeadowlarkCourt GoldenrodCircle Woodridge Court SunfishCourt QuarterHorseCourt BrokenOakCourt ClydesdaleCircle WolfCircle GreySquirrelRoad SandpiperDrive CrippleCreekCourt SedgeCourt RuffedGrouseCourt Tomahawk C o u r t Timberwolf Circle ShadowLakeCourtE WhitetailRidge MineralPoint CountyRdJ DeerwoodCircle HighlandCircle KilldeerCourt HartfordCircle LangerCircle ClearwaterCreekCircl ArrowheadCourt IronwoodCircle 20thAveN AshStW 80thStE SunsetAve MainSt 20thAveS GoiffonRd SunsetAve MainSt LakeDrNE CentervilleRd LilacSt MainSt LilacSt BirchSt NorthRd 20thAveS AshSt AshSt Ho dgson Rd BirchSt HodgsonRd ApolloDr LakeDrNE LakeDr CentervilleRd 20thAveN ApolloDr LakeDr CountyRdJ SunsetAve Birch St OtterLakeDrive Otter Lake Drive MainSt AshSt MainSt BirchSt Sno w G o o s e T r a i l Marshan Ct Sav. Ct RICE C R E E K C H A I N O F L A K E S R E G I O N A L P A R K R E S E R V E Cit y o f Ce n t e r v i l l e RONDEAU LAKE (2-15)FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.6 OTTER LAKE (2-3)OHWL 911.5FIRM BFE 913FIS BFE 912.7 BALD EAGLE LAKE (62-2)OHWL 911.0FIRM BFE 913FIS BFE 912.5 AMELIA LAKE (2-14)OHWL 908.1FIRM BFE 910FIS BFE 910.2 BALDWIN LAKE (2-13) OHWL 883.1FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 RESHANAU LAKE (2-9) OHWL 883.5FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 RICE LAKE (2-8)OHWL 883.1FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 CENTERVILLE LAKE (2-6)OHWL 885.0FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.9 MARSHAN LAKE (2-7)OHWL 883.3FIRM BFE 887FIS BFE 887.0 PELTIER LAKE (2-4)OHWL 884.7FIRM BFE 888FIS BFE 887.7 WARDS LAKE (2-10) OHWL 883.7 CEDAR LAKE (2-12) OHWL 892.9 WILKINSON LAKE (62-43) OHWL 895.2 SHERMAN LAKE (2-11) GEORGE WATCH LAKE (2-5) UNNAMED (2-1) Ord. 11-95 Ord. 22-97 Ord.08-95 Ord. 17-03 Ord.04-04 Ord. 09-88 Ord.12-03 Ord. 93-10 Ord.08-90 Ord. 94-14 Ord.08-02 Ord. 01-14 Ord.12-04 Ord. 07-16 Ord. 92-15 Ord. 04-16 Ord. 05-18 Ord. 08-99 Ord. 12-18 Ord. 20-03 Ord.14-99 Ord.09-99 Ord. 06-14 Ord. 06-91 Ord. 02-14 Ord. 16-01 Ord. 03-05 Ord. 05-03Ord.26-04 Ord. 03-00 Ord.06-18 PSP PSP PSP PSP PSP GI LI LI GB GB GB R-6 R-4 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-2 R-1X R-1X R-1X R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-X R-X R R R R R R R R PSPOrd. 12-99 456721 456749 456754 456723 456749 456714 456754 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 ")53 ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 §¨¦35E §¨¦35W 6300 6400 6600 6500 7100 6700 8400 8300 6800 8200 8100 6900 7600 7700 7500 7300 7800 7400 7900 7000 7200 8000 6100 6700 7100 6300 6500 8400 6600 8300 8200 6200 6900 7800 6000 6800 6400 8100 7600 7700 7500 7300 7400 7900 7000 7200 8000 90 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 0 0 16 0 0 70 0 11 0 0 40 0 10 0 0 60 0 50 0 80 0 17 0 0 18 0 0 19 0 0 20 0 030 0 21 0 0 20 0 0 22 0 0 10 0 23 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 22 0 0 21 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 0 16 0 0 14 0 0 12 0 0 10 0 0 80 0 60 0 40 0 30 0 20 0 10 0 0 23 0 0 20 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 90 0 70 0 50 0 Zoning Map of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Community Development 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Phone (651) 982-2400 City of Shoreview City of North Oaks White Bear Township City of Columbus Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f H u g o : Legend ZONING R Rural R-X Rural Executive R-1 Single Family Residential R-1X Single Family Executive R-2 Two Family Residential R-3 Medium Density Residential R-4 High Density Residential R-5 High Density Residential and Business R-6 Manufactured Home Park NB Neighborhood Business LB Limited Business GB General Business LI Light Industrial GI General Industrial BC Business Campus PSP Public Semi-Public PUD Planned Unit Development Maps are for illustrative purposes only. Recent changes may not be included. Land Use and Zoning Information should be verified with City Staff. 0 2,000 4,0001,000 DRAWING SCALE IN FEET Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s Updated Through Ord. No. 08-22 Effective January 5, 2023 Coordinate System: Anoka County NAD83 Feet Lambert Conformal Conic od d ev e n odd even HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM Anoka County Parcel Data: April 2023 Release Development Area 3-5 Figure 3-1� Full Build Land Use Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake BaldEagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake AmeliaLake Reshanau LakeRice Lake CentervilleLake Marshan Lake GeorgeWatchLake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20th Ave S 456721 456749 456754 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 20th Ave 20th Ave §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Main St Main St Cedar St Hodgson Rd Lake Dr Elm St Birch St Birch St Lake Dr Sunset Ave Rondeau Lake Dr E Ash St Oak Ln Apollo Dr 62nd St N Ash St Rondeau Lake Rd W Centerville Rd Holly Dr 4th Ave Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St City of Blaine City of Columbus City of Hugo City of North Oaks White Bear Township ´ Figure 3-1Full Build Out Land Use Legend City of Centerville Permanent Rural Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Residential / Commercial Office Residential Signature Gateway District Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial Civic and Institutional Parks and Open Space Private Airfield Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 2/7/201911/9/2020 Development Area 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix E Appendix E: Existing and Planned Intersection Control Exhibits H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO EXISTING INTERSECTION CONTROL 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 345 1 2 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO PROPOSED INTERSECTION CONTROL 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 Roundabout Yield Roundabout Yield 345 1 27 6 8 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix F Appendix F: Existing (2024) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Diagrams H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO EXISTING TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 1418 X XX 194 16 X 353 79 X 192 17 X 107 5 X X XX X 1226 X XX X 1714 194 X 9 336 X 32 190 X 18 75 X 11 X 1935 X XX 18932911 23817419 13 354 54 30 18 9 8 1 3 18 141 97 75 2613 21035610 282 X22 405 X192 X X X X 51 295 X 25 193 X X X 139 X73 385 X19 X XX X 116 197 X 13 339 X 14 200 X 5 80 X 7 X 209 X XX 345 1 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678403 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Lino Lakes, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 576 217 10 210 356 41 1 141 256 8 0.920.92 18 12 3 97 390 13 75 26 310 114 Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AMPeak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM 3.1 6.9 10 3.8 2.5 7.3 0 9.9 7.8 37.5 0 25 0 6.2 3.8 15.4 1.3 11.5 4.5 5.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Northbound)(Northbound) CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 6:00 AM 0 11 5 0 48 31 2 0 1 5 1 0 5 3 11 0 123 6:15 AM 3 9 2 0 60 24 3 0 0 2 0 0 18 0 11 0 132 6:30 AM 1 8 6 0 80 36 2 0 1 0 0 0 33 0 13 0 180 6:45 AM 3 19 2 0 86 44 2 0 0 0 0 0 43 2 22 0 223 658 7:00 AM 2 13 5 0 98 41 1 0 0 4 1 0 21 4 23 0 213 748 7:15 AM 2 10 9 0 100 24 5 0 0 3 0 0 15 4 19 0 191 807 7:30 AM 2 17 11 0 107 50 0 0 1 1 0 0 25 3 32 0 249 876 7:45 AM 4 14 7 0 88 61 3 0 0 3 1 0 29 8 42 0 260 913 8:00 AM 4 18 3 0 73 54 6 0 0 2 1 0 18 5 35 0 219 919 8:15 AM 3 26 5 0 88 45 1 0 0 2 1 0 25 2 32 0 230 958 8:30 AM 1 24 9 0 95 37 0 0 2 1 1 0 10 3 35 0 218 927 8:45 AM 3 30 8 0 68 45 2 0 0 0 1 0 16 2 25 0 200 867 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 16 56 28 0 352 244 12 0 0 12 4 0 116 32 168 0 1040 Heavy Trucks 4 0 4 0 12 4 0 4 0 8 0 20 56 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678404 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Lino Lakes, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 529 610 11 189 329 43 18 354 421 30 0.920.92 13 57 9 54 533 19 238 174 252 431 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PMPeak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 2.5 1 0 1.6 3 0 0 1.4 2.1 0 0 0 0 7.4 2.3 0 0.4 1.1 2.8 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Northbound)(Northbound) CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 3:30 PM 4 68 69 0 82 49 2 0 3 6 4 0 15 1 84 0 387 3:45 PM 4 61 32 0 84 50 3 0 2 4 2 0 14 5 87 0 348 4:00 PM 5 63 39 0 81 35 0 0 7 7 8 0 13 7 79 0 344 4:15 PM 5 59 43 0 79 32 1 0 6 9 3 0 13 2 100 0 352 1431 4:30 PM 5 70 59 0 87 45 2 0 5 9 2 0 15 2 89 0 390 1434 4:45 PM 5 46 41 0 83 55 3 0 3 7 3 0 17 4 83 0 350 14365:00 PM 4 63 31 0 80 57 5 0 4 5 1 0 9 5 82 0 346 1438 5:15 PM 2 62 19 0 90 61 3 0 1 3 2 0 6 3 88 0 340 1426 5:30 PM 7 54 18 0 85 47 3 0 2 3 1 0 10 4 84 0 318 13545:45 PM 6 60 22 0 75 52 8 0 5 6 4 0 9 6 92 0 345 1349 6:00 PM 4 44 18 0 63 37 1 0 3 8 3 0 6 4 67 0 258 1261 6:15 PM 3 34 17 0 76 34 5 0 2 6 1 0 10 7 65 0 260 1181 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 20 280 236 0 348 180 8 0 20 36 8 0 60 8 356 0 1560 Heavy Trucks 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 36 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd -- CSAH 32/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678401 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Lino Lakes, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 404 164 19 385 0 92 25 0 0 0 0.950.95 0 218 193 0 0 73 139 0 578 212 Peak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AMPeak-Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM 3.2 3.7 21.1 2.3 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 5 5.2 0 0 11 3.6 0 3.3 6.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Northbound)(Northbound) CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH 32/Ash StCSAH 32/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH 32/Ash StCSAH 32/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 6:00 AM 7 15 0 0 0 53 0 0 1 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 102 6:15 AM 5 17 0 0 0 69 1 0 4 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 118 6:30 AM 4 16 0 0 0 82 3 0 11 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 156 6:45 AM 13 30 0 0 0 79 1 0 9 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 181 557 7:00 AM 12 23 0 0 0 94 1 0 3 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 178 633 7:15 AM 7 25 0 0 0 84 3 0 11 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 172 687 7:30 AM 12 35 0 0 0 114 5 0 6 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 220 751 7:45 AM 23 30 0 0 0 98 5 0 6 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 213 783 8:00 AM 15 40 0 0 0 83 2 0 4 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 196 801 8:15 AM 23 34 0 0 0 90 7 0 9 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 205 834 8:30 AM 18 44 0 0 0 86 3 0 16 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 208 822 8:45 AM 20 32 0 0 0 72 3 0 12 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 180 789 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 48 140 0 0 0 456 20 0 24 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 880 Heavy Trucks 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 24 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd -- CSAH 32/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678402 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Lino Lakes, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 304 456 22 282 0 214 51 0 0 0 0.950.95 0 346 295 0 0 192 405 0 577 597 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PMPeak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 1.3 1.8 4.5 1.1 0 1.4 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1.7 0 1.6 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Northbound)(Northbound) CSAH 21/Centerville RdCSAH 21/Centerville Rd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH 32/Ash StCSAH 32/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH 32/Ash StCSAH 32/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 3:30 PM 48 107 0 0 0 72 6 0 14 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 312 3:45 PM 48 104 0 0 0 73 5 0 14 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 302 4:00 PM 50 98 0 0 0 54 4 0 5 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 277 4:15 PM 41 118 0 0 0 50 7 0 16 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 291 1182 4:30 PM 45 117 0 0 0 64 7 0 13 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 329 1199 4:45 PM 52 82 0 0 0 56 6 0 15 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 281 11785:00 PM 44 106 0 0 0 84 7 0 11 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 329 1230 5:15 PM 51 100 0 0 0 78 2 0 12 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 308 1247 5:30 PM 34 106 0 0 0 64 6 0 21 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 305 12235:45 PM 45 111 0 0 0 72 8 0 15 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 304 1246 6:00 PM 32 85 0 0 0 55 6 0 11 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 237 1154 6:15 PM 27 75 0 0 0 68 3 0 10 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 232 1078 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 180 468 0 0 0 256 28 0 52 0 332 0 0 0 0 0 1316 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 28 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Monarch Way -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678405 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: North Oaks, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 87 200 0.960.96 80 205 5 7 220 9 0 20 12 29 Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AMPeak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM Peak 15-Min: 8:45 AM -- 9:00 AMPeak 15-Min: 8:45 AM -- 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11.2 0 0 11.5 6 11.3 6.3 20 14.3 5.5 11.1 0 0 16.7 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Monarch WayMonarch Way (Northbound)(Northbound) Monarch WayMonarch Way (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 6:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 7 0 0 33 6:15 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 6 0 0 40 6:30 AM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 1 5 0 0 60 6:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 1 13 0 0 70 203 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 0 0 12 0 0 62 232 7:15 AM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 2 11 0 0 68 260 7:30 AM 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 16 0 0 74 274 7:45 AM 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 2 25 0 0 80 2848:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 0 1 16 0 0 77 299 8:15 AM 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 2 0 1 24 0 0 79 310 8:30 AM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 1 0 2 20 0 0 81 317 8:45 AM 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 3 20 0 0 84 321 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 16 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 4 0 12 80 0 0 336 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 4 0 20 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Monarch Way -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678406 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: North Oaks, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 210 339 0.870.87 197 353 14 13 350 6 0 11 27 17 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PMPeak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.4 1.8 1.5 1.7 0 0 2 0 0 9.1 0 5.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Monarch WayMonarch Way (Northbound)(Northbound) Monarch WayMonarch Way (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 3:30 PM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 2 0 2 47 0 0 130 3:45 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 4 0 2 42 0 0 119 4:00 PM 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 1 0 4 58 0 0 137 4:15 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 4 0 3 44 0 0 127 513 4:30 PM 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 3 0 2 51 0 0 166 549 4:45 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 3 0 3 52 0 0 138 5685:00 PM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 5 0 2 50 0 0 140 571 5:15 PM 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 0 6 44 0 0 136 580 5:30 PM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 3 0 4 36 0 0 139 5535:45 PM 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 4 0 5 46 0 0 123 538 6:00 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4 0 3 36 0 0 100 498 6:15 PM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 2 0 2 27 0 0 93 455 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 420 12 0 8 204 0 0 664 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Rapp Farm Blvd -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678407 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: North Oaks, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 86 190 0.850.85 75 208 18 11 209 35 0 19 29 54 Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AMPeak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM Peak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 0 0 8.1 6.3 6.7 5.8 0 18.2 5.7 2.9 0 0 6.9 1.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Rapp Farm BlvdRapp Farm Blvd (Northbound)(Northbound) Rapp Farm BlvdRapp Farm Blvd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 6:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 1 5 0 0 29 6:15 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 0 0 10 0 0 45 6:30 AM 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 7 0 0 60 6:45 AM 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 3 0 0 14 0 0 72 206 7:00 AM 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 0 1 13 0 0 68 245 7:15 AM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 3 0 1 12 0 0 65 265 7:30 AM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 1 0 1 19 0 0 75 280 7:45 AM 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 1 0 3 26 0 0 82 2908:00 AM 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 3 0 1 14 0 0 81 303 8:15 AM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 0 4 18 0 0 77 315 8:30 AM 17 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 5 0 3 23 0 0 102 342 8:45 AM 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 8 0 3 20 0 0 88 348 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 68 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 20 0 12 92 0 0 408 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 12 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Rapp Farm Blvd -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678408 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: North Oaks, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 203 336 0.900.90 194 368 32 9 353 14 0 17 41 31 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PMPeak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1.9 0 0 2 2.4 1.5 2.2 0 11.1 2.8 7.1 0 11.8 2.4 9.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Rapp Farm BlvdRapp Farm Blvd (Northbound)(Northbound) Rapp Farm BlvdRapp Farm Blvd (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 3:30 PM 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 4 0 3 46 0 0 132 3:45 PM 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 4 0 1 42 0 0 129 4:00 PM 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 6 0 6 51 0 0 132 4:15 PM 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 5 0 1 49 0 0 138 531 4:30 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 7 0 2 50 0 0 168 567 4:45 PM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 10 0 4 50 0 0 148 5865:00 PM 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 10 0 2 45 0 0 148 602 5:15 PM 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 6 0 9 42 0 0 137 601 5:30 PM 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 7 0 3 38 0 0 146 5795:45 PM 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 9 0 12 36 0 0 132 563 6:00 PM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 5 0 8 33 0 0 109 524 6:15 PM 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 9 0 5 22 0 0 95 482 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 420 28 0 8 200 0 0 672 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Holly Dr -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678409 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Saint Paul, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 38 22 26 0 12 133 17 5 112 192 0.850.85 107 209 0 0 205 0 0 1 0 1 Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AMPeak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM Peak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AM 10.5 4.5 11.5 0 8.3 8.3 5.9 0 7.1 6.3 7.5 6.2 0 0 6.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Holly DrHolly Dr (Northbound)(Northbound) Holly DrHolly Dr (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 3 21 0 0 0 5 0 0 34 6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 27 0 0 0 10 0 0 43 6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 44 0 0 0 11 1 0 64 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 48 0 0 0 15 2 0 75 216 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 4 0 9 0 3 44 0 0 0 15 2 0 78 260 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 0 4 41 0 0 0 14 0 0 73 290 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 14 0 3 45 0 0 0 24 1 0 92 318 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 6 0 9 0 4 34 0 0 0 31 1 0 85 3288:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 44 0 0 0 22 2 0 80 330 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 6 43 0 0 0 22 1 0 80 337 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 5 49 0 0 0 38 1 0 106 351 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 6 56 0 0 0 25 1 0 94 360 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 16 0 36 0 20 196 0 0 0 152 4 0 424 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 8 0 0 4 0 24 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Holly Dr -- CSAH J/Ash St QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 16678410 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Saint Paul, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Jul 18 2024 32 95 18 0 14 212 79 16 210 353 0.900.90 194 432 0 0 367 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PMPeak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1.9 0 0 1.9 2.5 2.1 2.1 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Holly DrHolly Dr (Northbound)(Northbound) Holly DrHolly Dr (Southbound)(Southbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Eastbound)(Eastbound) CSAH J/Ash StCSAH J/Ash St (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 12 73 0 0 1 45 6 0 144 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 7 73 0 0 0 41 7 0 133 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 10 61 0 0 0 51 3 0 133 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 19 78 0 0 0 46 4 0 153 563 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 6 0 17 106 0 0 0 49 4 0 187 606 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 24 82 0 0 0 52 2 0 168 6415:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 19 87 0 0 0 47 6 0 166 674 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 18 75 0 0 1 37 4 0 141 662 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 18 88 0 0 0 39 6 0 160 6355:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 13 67 0 0 0 43 2 0 135 602 6:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 8 58 1 0 0 37 2 0 112 548 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 56 0 0 0 22 3 0 94 501 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-MinFlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 20 0 24 0 68 424 0 0 0 196 16 0 748 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 12 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 7/22/2024 9:00 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix G Appendix G: Existing (2024) Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM 6th AWSC 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 40.5 Intersection LOS E Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 8 3 97 18 141 13 75 26 356 210 10 Future Vol, veh/h 1 8 3 97 18 141 13 75 26 356 210 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 38 0 6 0 10 15 1 12 2 4 10 Mvmt Flow 1 9 3 105 20 153 14 82 28 387 228 11 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 1 HCM Control Delay 10.5 11.5 10.3 60 HCM LOS B B B F Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 15% 0% 8% 84% 0% 62% Vol Thru, % 85% 0% 67% 16% 0% 36% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 25% 0% 100% 2% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 88 26 12 115 141 576 LT Vol 13 0 1 97 0 356 Through Vol 75 0 8 18 0 210 RT Vol 0 26 3 0 141 10 Lane Flow Rate 96 28 13 125 153 626 Geometry Grp 5 5 4b 5 5 4b Degree of Util (X) 0.175 0.044 0.026 0.251 0.255 1.001 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.602 5.57 7.228 7.241 5.996 5.753 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 543 642 493 495 598 632 Service Time 4.348 3.316 5.301 4.992 3.746 3.78 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.044 0.026 0.253 0.256 0.991 HCM Control Delay 10.8 8.6 10.5 12.4 10.8 60 HCM Lane LOS B A B B B F HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.1 0.1 1 1 15.3 HCM 6th TWSC 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 193 73 139 385 19 Future Vol, veh/h 25 193 73 139 385 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 5 11 4 2 21 Mvmt Flow 27 210 79 151 418 21 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 663 429 439 0 - 0 Stage 1 429 - - - - - Stage 2 234 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.66 6.275 4.265 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.46 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.86 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5383.34752.3045 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 617 1065 - - - Stage 1 651 - - - - - Stage 2 778 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 373 617 1065 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 373 - - - - - Stage 1 598 - - - - - Stage 2 778 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14 3.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1065 - 373 617 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 - 0.073 0.34 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 0.2 15.4 13.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.2 1.5 - - HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 200 5 7 80 9 20 Future Vol, veh/h 200 5 7 80 9 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 20 14 11 11 0 Mvmt Flow 217 5 8 87 10 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 222 0 323 220 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 103 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.24 - 6.51 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.326 - 3.599 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1279 - 653 825 Stage 1 - - - - 796 - Stage 2 - - - - 899 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1279 - 648 825 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 648 - Stage 1 - - - - 796 - Stage 2 - - - - 893 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 761 - - 1279 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 - - 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Future Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 0 18 7 3 0 Mvmt Flow 207 20 12 82 38 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 228 0 315 208 Stage 1 - - - - 208 - Stage 2 - - - - 107 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.43 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.527 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 676 837 Stage 1 - - - - 824 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1250 - 668 836 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 668 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 719 - - 1250 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 8 0 8 12 Mvmt Flow 18 209 116 5 13 28 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 121 0 - 0 364 119 Stage 1 - - - - 119 - Stage 2 - - - - 245 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.48 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.48 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.48 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.572 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 624 906 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 615 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 615 - Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1442 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM 7:30 am 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 41 0 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 41 0 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 45 0 0 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 91 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 90 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 909 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 934 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 884 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 884 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 908 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM SimTraffic Report ISG Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LT R LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 60 46 43 38 202 Average Queue (ft) 13 29 25 23 17 101 95th Queue (ft) 41 58 46 46 41 187 Link Distance (ft) 174 1551 2074 904 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 440 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB EB NB SB Directions Served L R LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 45 100 74 9 Average Queue (ft) 18 59 31 1 95th Queue (ft) 50 101 75 14 Link Distance (ft) 2914 298 1724 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 3: Monarch Way & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 20 43 Average Queue (ft) 2 17 95th Queue (ft) 22 48 Link Distance (ft) 1272 638 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 10/10/2024 01 Existing AM SimTraffic Report ISG Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 5 45 Average Queue (ft) 1 27 95th Queue (ft) 8 51 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 5 52 Average Queue (ft) 1 24 95th Queue (ft) 8 53 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 22 Average Queue (ft) 10 95th Queue (ft) 31 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 6th AWSC 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 57.3 Intersection LOS F Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 30 9 54 13 354 19 238 174 329 189 11 Future Vol, veh/h 18 30 9 54 13 354 19 238 174 329 189 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 Mvmt Flow 20 33 10 59 14 385 21 259 189 358 205 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 1 HCM Control Delay 14.2 24.7 17.4 120.3 HCM LOS B C C F Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 32% 81% 0% 62% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 53% 19% 0% 36% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 16% 0% 100% 2% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 257 174 57 67 354 529 LT Vol 19 0 18 54 0 329 Through Vol 238 0 30 13 0 189 RT Vol 0 174 9 0 354 11 Lane Flow Rate 279 189 62 73 385 575 Geometry Grp 5 5 4b 5 5 4b Degree of Util (X) 0.57 0.347 0.152 0.163 0.729 1.166 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.74 6.978 9.539 8.497 7.235 7.3 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 469 518 379 425 504 494 Service Time 5.44 4.678 7.539 6.197 4.935 5.386 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.595 0.365 0.164 0.172 0.764 1.164 HCM Control Delay 20.2 13.3 14.2 12.8 27 120.3 HCM Lane LOS C B B B D F HCM 95th-tile Q 3.5 1.5 0.5 0.6 6 20.5 HCM 6th TWSC 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 295 192 405 282 22 Future Vol, veh/h 51 295 192 405 282 22 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 1 2 1 4 Mvmt Flow 55 321 209 440 307 24 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 957 319 331 0 - 0 Stage 1 319 - - - - - Stage 2 638 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 4.115 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.3192.2095 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 270 721 1233 - - - Stage 1 736 - - - - - Stage 2 489 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 210 721 1233 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 210 - - - - - Stage 1 571 - - - - - Stage 2 489 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16 3.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1233 - 210 721 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.169 - 0.264 0.445 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0.5 28.2 13.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1 2.3 - - HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 339 14 13 197 6 11 Future Vol, veh/h 339 14 13 197 6 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 2 0 9 Mvmt Flow 368 15 14 214 7 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 383 0 618 376 Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 242 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1187 - 456 655 Stage 1 - - - - 699 - Stage 2 - - - - 803 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1187 - 450 655 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 450 - Stage 1 - - - - 699 - Stage 2 - - - - 793 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 11.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 564 - - 1187 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 - - 0.012 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 - - 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Future Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 11 2 7 12 Mvmt Flow 365 35 10 211 15 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 400 0 596 365 Stage 1 - - - - 365 - Stage 2 - - - - 231 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.21 - 6.47 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.47 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.299 - 3.563 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 458 658 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 796 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 454 658 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 454 - Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 547 - - 1111 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Future Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 0 0 2 Mvmt Flow 86 384 211 17 15 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 - 0 776 220 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 556 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 369 820 Stage 1 - - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 339 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 339 - Stage 1 - - - - 754 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 12.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1352 - - - 506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - - 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report ISG Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 43 0 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 43 0 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 47 0 0 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 95 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 94 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 905 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 930 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 879 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 879 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 903 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 - - 0.029 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - - 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM SimTraffic Report ISG Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LT R LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 51 110 82 59 322 Average Queue (ft) 17 20 62 52 39 193 95th Queue (ft) 40 41 117 86 62 404 Link Distance (ft) 174 1551 2074 904 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 440 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB EB NB Directions Served L R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 82 149 66 Average Queue (ft) 30 77 38 95th Queue (ft) 87 142 70 Link Distance (ft) 2914 298 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Intersection: 3: Monarch Way & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 Average Queue (ft) 6 12 95th Queue (ft) 29 37 Link Distance (ft) 1272 638 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 10/10/2024 02 Existing PM SimTraffic Report ISG Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 31 Average Queue (ft) 2 15 95th Queue (ft) 13 36 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 28 Average Queue (ft) 10 17 95th Queue (ft) 35 37 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 28 Average Queue (ft) 20 95th Queue (ft) 41 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix H Appendix H: Map and Crash Detail Report Crash Case Listing Crash Area 1 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: CR J/Ash St @ CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd) Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 Crash Case Listing Crash Area 2.5 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev 04-CSAH 32 7.979 02 Lino Lakes 01140731 10/31/23 0230 TUE SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 7.982 02 Lino Lakes 01001003 01/22/22 1657 SAT SVROR 1 C 04-CSAH 32 7.994 02 Lino Lakes 00977879 12/06/21 1020 MON SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 7.997 02 Lino Lakes 00979834 12/10/21 1718 FRI SSO 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.022 02 Lino Lakes 00849083 10/23/20 0002 FRI SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.025 02 Lino Lakes 01067900 12/17/22 1000 SAT SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.043 02 Lino Lakes 00932906 08/07/21 1207 SAT SSO 2 C 04-CSAH 32 8.107 02 Lino Lakes 01149165 12/09/23 0318 SAT SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.111 02 Lino Lakes 00680160 01/28/19 0530 MON SVROR 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.310 02 Lino Lakes 01053870 10/25/22 0519 TUE Other 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.363 02 Lino Lakes 00739561 08/10/19 1237 SAT Rear End 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.607 02 Lino Lakes 01117465 06/29/23 2035 THU Other 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.773 02 Lino Lakes 00808901 05/02/20 1230 SAT Angle 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.842 02 Lino Lakes 00905478 05/12/21 1519 WED Angle 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.845 02 Lino Lakes 01017077 04/11/22 1734 MON Angle 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.849 02 Lino Lakes 00752249 10/04/19 1600 FRI SSO 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.850 02 Lino Lakes 01134192 09/27/23 1353 WED Other 2 N Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - ROUTE FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: Corridor Between Crash Areas 2 and 3 Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 Crash Case Listing Crash Area 2 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev 04-CSAH 21 0.262 02 Lino Lakes 00684278 02/05/19 1730 TUE Angle 3 N 04-CSAH 21 0.262 02 Lino Lakes 00741687 08/20/19 1616 TUE Other 2 C 04-CSAH 21 0.267 02 Lino Lakes 01130479 09/08/23 1157 FRI Rear End 2 C 04-CSAH 21 0.270 02 Lino Lakes 00843926 10/01/20 0809 THU SSO 2 N 04-CSAH 21 0.294 02 Lino Lakes 00683030 02/04/19 1016 MON Other 1 N 04-CSAH 32 8.842 02 Lino Lakes 00905478 05/12/21 1519 WED Angle 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.845 02 Lino Lakes 01017077 04/11/22 1734 MON Angle 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.849 02 Lino Lakes 00752249 10/04/19 1600 FRI SSO 2 N 04-CSAH 32 8.850 02 Lino Lakes 01134192 09/27/23 1353 WED Other 2 N Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: CSAH 32 (Ash St) @ CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd) Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 Crash Case Listing Crash Area 3 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: CSAH 32 (Ash St) @ Monarch Way Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 Crash Case Listing Crash Area 4 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: CSAH 32 (Ash St) @ Rapp Farm Blvd Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 Crash Case Listing Crash Area 5 Route System Route Number Measure Co City Incident Number Date Time Day of Week Basic Type Num Veh Sev Selection Filter: WORK AREA: County('659447','2') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021','2022','2023','2024') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Andrea Schmid Notes: CSAH 32 (Ash St) @ Holly Dr Report Generated 07/15/2024 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 1 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix I Appendix I: Internal Capture Charts AND AM INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LAND USE A LAND USE B ITE LU Code Varies ITE LU Code 822 Exit to External Size Varies Size <40K Enter from External 88 Total Internal External 2%1 14%6 Total Internal External 62 Enter 30 1 29 Enter 63 1 62 Exit 89 1 88 Exit 42 1 41 29 Total 119 1 118 Total 105 1 104 41 Enter from External 100% 1% 99%1%1 17%11 100% 1% 99%Exit to External RESIDENTIAL 1 MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION RETAIL 1 LAND USE A LAND USE B TOTAL Net External Trips for Mulit-Use Development Exit 88 41 130 Enter 29 62 92 1% Total 118 104 221 INTERNAL CAPTURE Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 119 105 224 AND PM INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LAND USE A LAND USE B ITE LU Code Varies ITE LU Code 822 Exit to External Size Varies Size <40K Enter from External 37 Total Internal External 46%37 26%41 Total Internal External 141 Enter 80 37 43 Enter 157 16 141 Exit 53 16 37 Exit 157 37 120 43 Total 133 53 81 Total 314 53 262 120 Enter from External 100% 39% 61%42%22 10%16 100% 17% 83%Exit to External MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION RESIDENTIAL RETAIL 37 16 Enter 43 141 185 Net External Trips for Mulit-Use Development LAND USE A LAND USE B TOTAL Exit 37 120 158 Total 81 262 342 INTERNAL CAPTURE Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 133 314 447 23% 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix J Appendix J: Trip Distribution H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST3451 27 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 30 % 30 % 40% 70% 70% 40% 30 % 30 % 25% 25% 5% TRIP DISTRIBUTION - WILKINSON RESIDENTIAL AM 5% 5% 5% 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST3451 27 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 20 % 20 % 25% 45% 60% 40% 40 % 55 % 40% 25% 15% TRIP DISTRIBUTION - WILKINSON RESIDENTIAL PM 15% 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX 345 1 27 6 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 35 % 35 % 40% 90% 90% 1 5 % 40% 1 5 % 10 % 10 % 10% 10% 15% 15 % TRIP DISTRIBUTION - WILKINSON RETAIL AM 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST3451 27 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 30 % 20 % 30% 80% 85% 2 5 % 40% 2 0 % 15 % 20 % 20% 15% 25% 20 % TRIP DISTRIBUTION - WILKINSON RETAIL PM 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST3451 27 6 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 10 % 15 % 25% 30% 3 5 % 4 5 % 50% 40% 5% TRIP DISTRIBUTION - NORTH OAKS FARMS AM 5% 50% R 60% 50% 57% 47% 3%3% 50% L 50% R 50% L 840% 60% 40%60% H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST3451 27 6 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES - TRIP DISTRIBUTION.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 ENTERING EXITING LT - LEFT MOVEMENT T - THRU MOVEMENT RT - RIGHT MOVEMENT 10 % 20 % 20% 35% 3 0 % 5 5 % 60% 35% 5% TRIP DISTRIBUTION - NORTH OAKS FARMS PM 5% 65% 40% 62% 37% 3%3% 3 60% R 40% L 40% R 60% L 835% 65% 35%65% 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix K Appendix K: Trip Assignment H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X 60 0 X 6 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 X 1 X 40 X XX X XX X 00 132 X 0 124 X 0 97 X 0 77 X 0 X 00 X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO DEVELOPMENT 2025 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 00 X XX 0 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 X X XX X 00 X XX X 00 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 X 0 X 00 X XX 0 028 0 051 53 0 0 63 30 31 51 6 40 37 0 0 0 031 0 09 28 X6 30 X0 X X X X 6 0 X 4 0 X X X 6 X0 9 X1 X XX X 00 27 X 0 45 X 0 13 X 0 26 X 0 X 00 X XX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 0 XX 0 XX X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 XX 0 XX 345 1 27 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X 60 17 X 6 15 X 0 21 X 0 6 X 1 X 40 X XX X XX X 00 132 X 0 124 X 0 97 X 0 77 X 0 X 00 X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO DEVELOPMENT 2045 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 10 X XX 10 1 X 28 0 X 8 0 X 19 1 X X XX X 00 X XX X 00 11 X 0 29 X 0 8 X 0 20 X 0 X 00 X XX 5 928 5 051 53 9 0 63 30 31 51 6 40 37 4 0 1 031 6 139 28 X9 30 X14 X X X X 7 14 X 6 19 X X X 6 X5 9 X2 0 129 0 00 29 13 0 51 23 0 15 6 0 30 5 0 0 00 0 1716 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 13 4X 12 6X X 3 2 X X X X X X X 4 4 17 2X 5 1X 345 1 27 6 8 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix L Appendix L: Future Scenario Peak Hour Turning Movement Volume Diagrams H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X XX 214 X X 346 X X 218 X X 92 X X X XX X XX X XX X 57X X X 43 X X X X X X X X 41 X 12X X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO NO BUILD 2025 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 1418 X XX 194 16 X 353 79 X 192 17 X 107 5 X X XX X 1226 X XX X 1714 194 X 9 336 X 32 190 X 18 75 X 11 X 1935 X XX 19133211 23917519 13 358 55 30 18 9 8 1 3 18 142 98 75 2613 21236010 284 X22 409 X194 X X X X 51 295 X 25 193 X X X 140 X74 388 X19 X XX X 116 197 X 13 339 X 14 200 X 5 80 X 7 X 209 X XX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 210 XX 350 XX X X X X X X X X X X X X 220 XX 87 XX 345 1 27 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X 60 214 X 6 346 X 0 218 X 0 92 X 1 X 40 X XX X XX X 570 132 X 43 124 X 0 97 X 0 77 X 41 X 120 X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO BUILD 2025 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 1418 X XX 194 16 X 353 79 X 192 17 X 107 5 X X XX X 1226 X XX X 1714 194 X 9 336 X 32 190 X 18 75 X 11 X 1935 X XX 19133239 23917570 66 358 55 93 48 40 59 7 43 55 142 98 75 2644 21236019 312 X28 439 X194 X X X X 57 295 X 29 193 X X X 146 X74 397 X20 X XX X 116 224 X 13 384 X 14 213 X 5 106 X 7 X 209 X XX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 210 XX 350 XX X X X X X X X X X X X X 220 XX 87 XX 345 1 27 6 8 H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X XX 214 X X 346 X X 218 X X 92 X X X XX X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO NO BUILD 2045 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 1418 X XX 194 16 X 353 79 X 192 17 X 107 5 X X XX X 1226 X XX X 1714 194 X 9 336 X 32 190 X 18 75 X 11 X 1935 X XX 23340514 26419321 16 436 67 30 18 9 8 1 3 22 174 120 83 2914 25943910 333 X26 499 X237 X X X X 51 295 X 25 193 X X X 171 X90 455 X22 X XX X 116 197 X 13 339 X 14 200 X 5 80 X 7 X 209 X XX ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 210 XX 350 XX X X X X X X X X X X X X 220 XX 87 XX 345 1 27 6 8 X XX X 57X X X 51 X X X X X X X X 46 X 12X X XX H O L L Y D R N R A P P F A R M B L V D MO N A R C H W A Y CSAH 32/ASH ST CE N T E R V I L L E R D CSAH 32/ASH ST CSAH J/ASH ST X XX X 60 231 X 6 361 X 0 239 X 0 98 X 1 X 40 X XX X XX X 570 132 X 51 124 X 0 97 X 0 77 X 46 X 120 X XX Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\TRAFFIC\30671 APPENDICES.DWG SAVED BY: ROSANNA.NOVELLINO BUILD 2045 - TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM 0 SCALE IN FEET 2000 4000 N STUDY INTERSECTIONX WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY PM X 1518 X XX 204 17 X 381 79 X 200 17 X 126 6 X X XX X 1226 X XX X 1714 205 X 9 365 X 32 198 X 18 95 X 11 X 1935 X XX 23841442 26919372 69 445 67 93 48 40 59 7 43 59 178 120 84 2945 26545219 361 X35 529 X251 X X X X 58 309 X 31 212 X X X 177 X95 464 X24 0 129 0 116 226 13 13 390 23 14 215 6 5 110 5 7 0 209 0 1716 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 10/14/2024 223 4X 362 6X X 3 2 X X X X X X X 4 4 237 2X 92 1X 345 1 27 6 8 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix M Appendix M: Opening Year No Build (2025) Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 13 281 124 632 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 16 302 130 650 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 751 100 412 149 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 48 442 355 253 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.3 5.6 9.6 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 16 302 130 650 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 641 1246 906 1185 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.793 0.930 0.955 0.972 Flow Entry, veh/h 13 281 124 632 Cap Entry, veh/h 509 1159 866 1152 V/C Ratio 0.025 0.242 0.143 0.548 Control Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.3 5.6 9.6 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 1 0 3 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.1 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 237 232 443 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 248 247 455 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 430 28 89 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 114 650 186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.3 4.4 6.4 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 248 247 455 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 890 1341 1260 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.956 0.939 0.973 Flow Entry, veh/h 237 232 443 Cap Entry, veh/h 850 1259 1226 V/C Ratio 0.279 0.184 0.361 Control Delay, s/veh 7.3 4.4 6.4 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/11/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 6 20 14 11 2 11 2 0 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 217 5 8 87 0 10 0 22 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 87 0 0 222 0 0 323 323 220 334 325 87 Stage 1 - - - - - - 220 220 - 103 103 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 103 103 - 231 222 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.24 - - 7.21 6.52 6.2 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.326 - - 3.599 4.018 3.3 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1509 - - 1279 - - 613 595 825 620 593 971 Stage 1 - - - - - - 762 721 - 903 810 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 881 810 - 772 720 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1509 - - 1279 - - 610 591 825 600 589 971 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 610 591 - 600 589 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 762 721 - 903 804 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 875 804 - 752 720 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 10.1 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 744 1509 - - 1279 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.006 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 0 - - 7.8 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/11/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Future Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 0 18 7 3 0 Mvmt Flow 207 20 12 82 38 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 228 0 315 208 Stage 1 - - - - 208 - Stage 2 - - - - 107 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.43 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.527 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 676 837 Stage 1 - - - - 824 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1250 - 668 836 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 668 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 719 - - 1250 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/11/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 8 0 8 12 Mvmt Flow 18 209 116 5 13 28 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 121 0 - 0 364 119 Stage 1 - - - - 119 - Stage 2 - - - - 245 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.48 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.48 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.48 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.572 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 624 906 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 615 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 615 - Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1442 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/11/2024 03 2025 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 41 0 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 41 0 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 45 0 0 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 91 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 90 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 909 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 934 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 884 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 884 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 908 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.027 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.3 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 03 2025 No Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 62 41 66 Average Queue (ft) 7 23 18 33 95th Queue (ft) 40 63 46 70 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 72 16 52 Average Queue (ft) 37 2 15 95th Queue (ft) 78 19 48 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 34 Average Queue (ft) 1 20 95th Queue (ft) 6 46 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 03 2025 No Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 50 Average Queue (ft) 5 26 95th Queue (ft) 26 52 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 49 Average Queue (ft) 2 23 95th Queue (ft) 18 53 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 Average Queue (ft) 9 95th Queue (ft) 30 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.2 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 63 463 471 581 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 63 471 473 596 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 648 301 425 99 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 47 597 286 673 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.0 9.0 11.1 8.0 Approach LOS A A B A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 63 471 473 596 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 713 1015 895 1247 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.983 0.996 0.975 Flow Entry, veh/h 63 463 471 581 Cap Entry, veh/h 713 998 891 1216 V/C Ratio 0.088 0.464 0.529 0.478 Control Delay, s/veh 6.0 9.0 11.1 8.0 LOS A A B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 3 3 3 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.6 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 376 656 333 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 383 667 337 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 312 56 213 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 238 639 510 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 8.3 6.2 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 383 667 337 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1004 1303 1110 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.984 0.988 Flow Entry, veh/h 376 656 333 Cap Entry, veh/h 985 1282 1097 V/C Ratio 0.382 0.512 0.303 Control Delay, s/veh 7.8 8.3 6.2 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 3 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 9 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 368 15 14 214 0 7 0 12 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 214 0 0 383 0 0 618 618 376 624 625 214 Stage 1 - - - - - - 376 376 - 242 242 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 242 242 - 382 383 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.52 6.29 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4.018 3.381 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1356 - - 1187 - - 404 405 655 398 401 826 Stage 1 - - - - - - 649 616 - 762 705 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 766 705 - 640 612 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1356 - - 1187 - - 400 400 655 387 396 826 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 400 400 - 387 396 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 649 616 - 762 696 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 756 696 - 628 612 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 12 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 535 1356 - - 1187 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - - 0.012 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 0 - - 8.1 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Future Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 11 2 7 12 Mvmt Flow 365 35 10 211 15 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 400 0 596 365 Stage 1 - - - - 365 - Stage 2 - - - - 231 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.21 - 6.47 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.47 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.299 - 3.563 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 458 658 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 796 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 454 658 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 454 - Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 547 - - 1111 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Future Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 0 0 2 Mvmt Flow 86 384 211 17 15 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 - 0 776 220 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 556 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 369 820 Stage 1 - - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 339 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 339 - Stage 1 - - - - 754 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 12.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1352 - - - 506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - - 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 43 0 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 43 0 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 47 0 0 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 95 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 94 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 905 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 930 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 879 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 879 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 903 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 - - 0.029 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - - 7.3 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 77 130 76 Average Queue (ft) 10 38 62 26 95th Queue (ft) 34 79 133 68 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 108 52 62 Average Queue (ft) 59 19 26 95th Queue (ft) 127 57 66 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 30 Average Queue (ft) 6 14 95th Queue (ft) 31 39 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 04 2025 No Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 13 34 Average Queue (ft) 2 18 95th Queue (ft) 19 38 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 41 Average Queue (ft) 21 19 95th Queue (ft) 73 44 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix N Appendix N: Opening Year Build (2025) Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 119 321 158 642 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 143 342 169 661 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 751 146 495 228 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 138 518 399 260 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.8 6.0 6.8 11.5 Approach LOS A A A B Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 143 342 169 661 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 641 1189 833 1094 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.831 0.939 0.936 0.971 Flow Entry, veh/h 119 321 158 642 Cap Entry, veh/h 533 1116 780 1062 V/C Ratio 0.223 0.288 0.203 0.604 Control Delay, s/veh 9.8 6.0 6.8 11.5 LOS A A A B 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 1 4 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.2 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 242 239 454 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 253 254 468 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 441 33 89 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 116 661 198 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 4.5 6.5 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 253 254 468 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 880 1334 1260 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.957 0.940 0.971 Flow Entry, veh/h 242 239 454 Cap Entry, veh/h 842 1254 1223 V/C Ratio 0.287 0.190 0.371 Control Delay, s/veh 7.4 4.5 6.5 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 213 5 7 106 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 6 20 14 11 2 11 2 0 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 232 5 8 115 0 10 0 22 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 115 0 0 237 0 0 366 366 235 377 368 115 Stage 1 - - - - - - 235 235 - 131 131 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 131 131 - 246 237 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.24 - - 7.21 6.52 6.2 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.326 - - 3.599 4.018 3.3 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1474 - - 1263 - - 574 562 809 580 561 937 Stage 1 - - - - - - 748 710 - 873 788 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 851 788 - 758 709 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1474 - - 1263 - - 571 558 809 561 557 937 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 571 558 - 561 557 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 748 710 - 873 782 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 845 782 - 738 709 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 10.3 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 716 1474 - - 1263 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 - - - 0.006 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 0 - - 7.9 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Future Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 0 18 7 3 0 Mvmt Flow 207 20 12 82 38 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 228 0 315 208 Stage 1 - - - - 208 - Stage 2 - - - - 107 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.43 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.527 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 676 837 Stage 1 - - - - 824 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1250 - 668 836 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 668 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 719 - - 1250 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 8 0 8 12 Mvmt Flow 18 209 116 5 13 28 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 121 0 - 0 364 119 Stage 1 - - - - 119 - Stage 2 - - - - 245 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.48 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.48 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.48 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.572 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 624 906 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 615 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 615 - Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1442 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 41 0 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 97 0 41 77 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 0 45 84 0 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 105 0 279 105 Stage 1 - - - - 105 - Stage 2 - - - - 174 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1486 - 711 949 Stage 1 - - - - 919 - Stage 2 - - - - 856 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1486 - 690 949 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 690 - Stage 1 - - - - 919 - Stage 2 - - - - 830 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 949 - - 1486 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.03 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - 7.5 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 218 0 0 92 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 218 0 1 92 0 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 237 0 1 100 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 237 0 339 237 Stage 1 - - - - 237 - Stage 2 - - - - 102 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1330 - 657 802 Stage 1 - - - - 802 - Stage 2 - - - - 922 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1330 - 656 802 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 656 - Stage 1 - - - - 802 - Stage 2 - - - - 921 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 802 - - 1330 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 220 0 0 87 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 220 0 0 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 239 0 0 95 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 334 239 0 0 239 0 Stage 1 239 - - - - - Stage 2 95 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 661 800 - - 1328 - Stage 1 801 - - - - - Stage 2 929 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 661 800 - - 1328 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 661 - - - - - Stage 1 801 - - - - - Stage 2 929 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1328 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 68 47 71 Average Queue (ft) 8 28 19 33 95th Queue (ft) 41 70 50 74 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 83 22 69 Average Queue (ft) 32 3 18 95th Queue (ft) 84 21 64 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 34 Average Queue (ft) 0 18 95th Queue (ft) 0 45 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 50 Average Queue (ft) 5 25 95th Queue (ft) 25 50 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 20 59 Average Queue (ft) 4 23 95th Queue (ft) 21 58 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 Average Queue (ft) 10 95th Queue (ft) 32 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 05 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.1 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 196 521 526 611 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 196 529 528 626 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 648 388 525 212 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 190 665 319 705 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.3 11.9 15.8 10.3 Approach LOS A B C B Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 196 529 528 626 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 713 929 808 1112 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.985 0.996 0.976 Flow Entry, veh/h 196 521 526 611 Cap Entry, veh/h 713 915 805 1085 V/C Ratio 0.275 0.569 0.654 0.563 Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 11.9 15.8 10.3 LOS A B C B 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 4 5 4 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.1 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 383 688 369 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 390 700 373 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 342 63 213 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 244 669 550 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.3 8.8 6.6 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 390 700 373 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 974 1294 1110 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.984 0.988 Flow Entry, veh/h 383 688 369 Cap Entry, veh/h 956 1273 1097 V/C Ratio 0.401 0.541 0.336 Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 8.8 6.6 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 3 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 384 14 13 224 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 9 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 417 15 14 243 0 7 0 12 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 243 0 0 432 0 0 696 696 425 702 703 243 Stage 1 - - - - - - 425 425 - 271 271 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 271 271 - 431 432 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.52 6.29 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4.018 3.381 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1323 - - 1138 - - 359 365 615 353 362 796 Stage 1 - - - - - - 611 586 - 735 685 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 739 685 - 603 582 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1323 - - 1138 - - 355 360 615 342 357 796 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 355 360 - 342 357 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 611 586 - 735 675 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 729 675 - 591 582 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12.7 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 489 1323 - - 1138 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.012 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 0 - - 8.2 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Future Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 11 2 7 12 Mvmt Flow 365 35 10 211 15 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 400 0 596 365 Stage 1 - - - - 365 - Stage 2 - - - - 231 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.21 - 6.47 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.47 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.299 - 3.563 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 458 658 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 796 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 454 658 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 454 - Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 547 - - 1111 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Future Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 0 0 2 Mvmt Flow 86 384 211 17 15 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 - 0 776 220 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 556 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 369 820 Stage 1 - - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 339 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 339 - Stage 1 - - - - 754 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 12.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1352 - - - 506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - - 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 43 0 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 124 0 43 132 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 135 0 47 143 0 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 135 0 372 135 Stage 1 - - - - 135 - Stage 2 - - - - 237 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 629 914 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 802 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 609 914 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 609 - Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 776 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.9 9.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 914 - - 1449 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 - - 0.032 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - - 7.6 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 346 0 0 214 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 346 0 6 214 0 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 376 0 7 233 0 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 376 0 623 376 Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 247 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 450 670 Stage 1 - - - - 694 - Stage 2 - - - - 794 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 447 670 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 447 - Stage 1 - - - - 694 - Stage 2 - - - - 788 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 10.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 670 - - 1182 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 - - 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 350 0 0 210 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 350 0 0 210 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 380 0 0 228 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 608 380 0 0 380 0 Stage 1 380 - - - - - Stage 2 228 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 459 667 - - 1178 - Stage 1 691 - - - - - Stage 2 810 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 459 667 - - 1178 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 459 - - - - - Stage 1 691 - - - - - Stage 2 810 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1178 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 77 130 76 Average Queue (ft) 10 38 62 26 95th Queue (ft) 34 79 133 68 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 108 52 62 Average Queue (ft) 59 19 26 95th Queue (ft) 127 57 66 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 30 Average Queue (ft) 6 14 95th Queue (ft) 31 39 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 13 34 Average Queue (ft) 2 18 95th Queue (ft) 19 38 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 41 Average Queue (ft) 21 19 95th Queue (ft) 73 44 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 06 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix O Appendix O: Design Year No Build (2045) Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.6 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 13 343 137 770 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 16 370 144 792 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 918 109 500 179 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 53 535 434 300 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.8 6.0 6.4 13.5 Approach LOS A A A B Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 16 370 144 792 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 541 1235 829 1150 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.793 0.927 0.952 0.972 Flow Entry, veh/h 13 343 137 770 Cap Entry, veh/h 429 1145 789 1117 V/C Ratio 0.030 0.300 0.174 0.689 Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 6.0 6.4 13.5 LOS A A A B 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 1 1 6 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.9 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 237 284 519 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 248 302 534 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 505 28 109 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 138 725 221 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 4.8 7.4 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 248 302 534 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 824 1341 1235 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.956 0.939 0.972 Flow Entry, veh/h 237 284 519 Cap Entry, veh/h 788 1259 1200 V/C Ratio 0.301 0.225 0.433 Control Delay, s/veh 8.0 4.8 7.4 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 6 20 14 11 2 11 2 0 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 217 5 8 87 0 10 0 22 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 87 0 0 222 0 0 323 323 220 334 325 87 Stage 1 - - - - - - 220 220 - 103 103 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 103 103 - 231 222 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.24 - - 7.21 6.52 6.2 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.326 - - 3.599 4.018 3.3 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1509 - - 1279 - - 613 595 825 620 593 971 Stage 1 - - - - - - 762 721 - 903 810 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 881 810 - 772 720 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1509 - - 1279 - - 610 591 825 600 589 971 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 610 591 - 600 589 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 762 721 - 903 804 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 875 804 - 752 720 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 10.1 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 744 1509 - - 1279 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.006 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 0 - - 7.8 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Future Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 0 18 7 3 0 Mvmt Flow 207 20 12 82 38 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 228 0 315 208 Stage 1 - - - - 208 - Stage 2 - - - - 107 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.43 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.527 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 676 837 Stage 1 - - - - 824 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1250 - 668 836 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 668 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 719 - - 1250 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 8 0 8 12 Mvmt Flow 18 209 116 5 13 28 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 121 0 - 0 364 119 Stage 1 - - - - 119 - Stage 2 - - - - 245 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.48 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.48 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.48 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.572 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 624 906 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - - 615 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 615 - Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1442 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 46 0 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 46 0 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 50 0 0 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 101 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 100 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 898 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 924 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 870 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 870 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 895 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.031 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.3 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 17 56 56 101 Average Queue (ft) 3 20 25 56 95th Queue (ft) 22 60 60 110 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 71 12 74 Average Queue (ft) 30 3 25 95th Queue (ft) 76 16 67 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 8 34 Average Queue (ft) 1 21 95th Queue (ft) 9 44 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 07 2045 No Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 36 Average Queue (ft) 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 14 44 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 10 37 Average Queue (ft) 1 23 95th Queue (ft) 11 43 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 23 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 33 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.9 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 63 564 520 708 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 63 574 522 726 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 789 330 506 118 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 55 698 346 786 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.0 11.7 14.8 10.3 Approach LOS A B B B Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 63 574 522 726 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 617 986 824 1223 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.983 0.996 0.975 Flow Entry, veh/h 63 564 520 708 Cap Entry, veh/h 617 968 820 1193 V/C Ratio 0.102 0.582 0.634 0.593 Control Delay, s/veh 7.0 11.7 14.8 10.3 LOS A B B B 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 4 5 4 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.2 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 376 800 390 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 383 814 395 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 366 56 261 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 290 693 609 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 10.5 7.4 Approach LOS A B A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 383 814 395 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 950 1303 1057 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.983 0.988 Flow Entry, veh/h 376 800 390 Cap Entry, veh/h 933 1281 1045 V/C Ratio 0.403 0.625 0.374 Control Delay, s/veh 8.5 10.5 7.4 LOS A B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 5 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 9 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 368 15 14 214 0 7 0 12 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 214 0 0 383 0 0 618 618 376 624 625 214 Stage 1 - - - - - - 376 376 - 242 242 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 242 242 - 382 383 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.52 6.29 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4.018 3.381 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1356 - - 1187 - - 404 405 655 398 401 826 Stage 1 - - - - - - 649 616 - 762 705 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 766 705 - 640 612 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1356 - - 1187 - - 400 400 655 387 396 826 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 400 400 - 387 396 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 649 616 - 762 696 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 756 696 - 628 612 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 12 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 535 1356 - - 1187 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - - 0.012 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 0 - - 8.1 0 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - - HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Future Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 11 2 7 12 Mvmt Flow 365 35 10 211 15 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 400 0 596 365 Stage 1 - - - - 365 - Stage 2 - - - - 231 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.21 - 6.47 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.47 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.299 - 3.563 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 458 658 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 796 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1111 - 454 658 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 454 - Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 547 - - 1111 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Future Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 0 0 2 Mvmt Flow 86 384 211 17 15 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 - 0 776 220 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 556 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 369 820 Stage 1 - - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 339 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 339 - Stage 1 - - - - 754 - Stage 2 - - - - 578 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 12.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1352 - - - 506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - - 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 51 0 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 51 0 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 55 0 0 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 111 1 Stage 1 - - - - 1 - Stage 2 - - - - 110 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 886 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1622 - 856 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 856 - Stage 1 - - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - - - - 884 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.3 8.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - - 7.3 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 110 164 113 Average Queue (ft) 15 52 68 43 95th Queue (ft) 40 121 147 106 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 100 54 56 Average Queue (ft) 51 14 24 95th Queue (ft) 107 56 50 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 23 40 Average Queue (ft) 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 23 51 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 08 2045 No Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 10 58 Average Queue (ft) 2 18 95th Queue (ft) 13 52 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 33 Average Queue (ft) 15 21 95th Queue (ft) 45 41 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 Average Queue (ft) 27 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix P Appendix P: Design Year Build (2045) Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.7 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 119 387 172 800 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 143 414 184 824 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 939 156 597 258 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 143 625 485 312 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.5 6.8 8.0 18.3 Approach LOS B A A C Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 143 414 184 824 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 530 1177 751 1061 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.831 0.935 0.935 0.971 Flow Entry, veh/h 119 387 172 800 Cap Entry, veh/h 440 1100 702 1030 V/C Ratio 0.270 0.352 0.245 0.777 Control Delay, s/veh 12.5 6.8 8.0 18.3 LOS B A A C 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 1 8 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.1 Intersection LOS A Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 264 295 530 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 277 314 545 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 514 35 114 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 145 755 235 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.7 4.9 7.6 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 277 314 545 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 817 1331 1228 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.953 0.940 0.972 Flow Entry, veh/h 264 295 530 Cap Entry, veh/h 779 1252 1194 V/C Ratio 0.339 0.236 0.444 Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 4.9 7.6 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 1 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 200 5 7 80 0 9 0 20 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 6 215 5 7 110 5 9 0 20 17 0 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 6 20 14 11 2 11 2 0 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 234 5 8 120 5 10 0 22 18 0 17 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 125 0 0 239 0 0 398 392 237 401 392 123 Stage 1 - - - - - - 251 251 - 139 139 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 147 141 - 262 253 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.24 - - 7.21 6.52 6.2 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.21 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.326 - - 3.599 4.018 3.3 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1462 - - 1261 - - 546 544 807 560 544 928 Stage 1 - - - - - - 734 699 - 864 782 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 780 - 743 698 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1462 - - 1261 - - 531 537 807 539 537 928 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 531 537 - 539 537 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 730 695 - 859 777 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 814 775 - 719 694 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.5 10.4 10.6 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 695 1462 - - 1261 - - 676 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 0.004 - - 0.006 - - 0.053 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 7.5 0 - 7.9 0 - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 190 18 11 75 35 19 Future Vol, veh/h 198 18 11 95 35 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 0 18 7 3 0 Mvmt Flow 215 20 12 103 38 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 236 0 344 216 Stage 1 - - - - 216 - Stage 2 - - - - 128 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.43 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.527 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1243 - 650 829 Stage 1 - - - - 818 - Stage 2 - - - - 895 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1242 - 642 828 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 642 - Stage 1 - - - - 817 - Stage 2 - - - - 885 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 10.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 697 - - 1242 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.6 - - 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 192 107 5 12 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 200 126 6 12 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 6 8 0 8 12 Mvmt Flow 18 217 137 7 13 28 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 144 0 - 0 394 141 Stage 1 - - - - 141 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - - - 6.48 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.48 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.48 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - - 3.572 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - - 599 881 Stage 1 - - - - 871 - Stage 2 - - - - 775 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - - 591 881 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 591 - Stage 1 - - - - 859 - Stage 2 - - - - 775 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1414 - - - 763 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.054 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 46 0 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 97 0 46 77 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 0 50 84 0 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 105 0 289 105 Stage 1 - - - - 105 - Stage 2 - - - - 184 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1486 - 702 949 Stage 1 - - - - 919 - Stage 2 - - - - 848 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1486 - 678 949 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 678 - Stage 1 - - - - 919 - Stage 2 - - - - 819 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.8 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 949 - - 1486 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - 7.5 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 218 0 0 92 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 239 0 1 98 0 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 260 0 1 107 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 260 0 369 260 Stage 1 - - - - 260 - Stage 2 - - - - 109 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1304 - 631 779 Stage 1 - - - - 783 - Stage 2 - - - - 916 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1304 - 630 779 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 630 - Stage 1 - - - - 783 - Stage 2 - - - - 915 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.6 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 779 - - 1304 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 - - 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM 7:30 am 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 220 0 0 87 Future Vol, veh/h 4 4 237 2 1 92 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 4 258 2 1 100 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 361 259 0 0 260 0 Stage 1 259 - - - - - Stage 2 102 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 638 780 - - 1304 - Stage 1 784 - - - - - Stage 2 922 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 637 780 - - 1304 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 637 - - - - - Stage 1 784 - - - - - Stage 2 921 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 701 1304 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.012 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 10.2 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 17 56 56 101 Average Queue (ft) 3 20 25 56 95th Queue (ft) 22 60 60 110 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 71 12 74 Average Queue (ft) 30 3 25 95th Queue (ft) 76 16 67 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 8 34 Average Queue (ft) 1 21 95th Queue (ft) 9 44 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 36 Average Queue (ft) 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 14 44 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 10 37 Average Queue (ft) 1 23 95th Queue (ft) 11 43 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 23 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 33 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 09 2045 Build AM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 6th Roundabout 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.8 Intersection LOS C Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 196 632 580 755 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 196 642 582 774 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 806 422 617 231 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 199 777 385 833 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 17.2 24.8 14.8 Approach LOS B C C B Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 196 642 582 774 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 607 897 735 1090 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.984 0.997 0.975 Flow Entry, veh/h 196 632 580 755 Cap Entry, veh/h 607 883 733 1063 V/C Ratio 0.323 0.716 0.791 0.710 Control Delay, s/veh 10.4 17.2 24.8 14.8 LOS B C C B 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 6 8 6 HCM 6th Roundabout 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.2 Intersection LOS B Approach EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 399 848 430 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 407 862 436 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 396 64 276 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 316 739 650 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.3 11.6 8.1 Approach LOS A B A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 407 862 436 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 921 1293 1041 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.983 0.986 Flow Entry, veh/h 399 848 430 Cap Entry, veh/h 903 1271 1027 V/C Ratio 0.442 0.667 0.419 Control Delay, s/veh 9.3 11.6 8.1 LOS A B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 5 2 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 339 14 13 197 0 6 0 11 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 23 390 14 13 226 13 6 0 11 12 0 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 9 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 424 15 14 246 14 7 0 12 13 0 10 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 260 0 0 439 0 0 768 770 432 769 770 253 Stage 1 - - - - - - 482 482 - 281 281 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 286 288 - 488 489 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.52 6.29 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4.018 3.381 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1304 - - 1132 - - 321 331 609 318 331 786 Stage 1 - - - - - - 569 553 - 726 678 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 726 674 - 561 549 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1304 - - 1132 - - 308 318 609 302 318 786 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 308 318 - 302 318 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 555 539 - 708 669 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 707 665 - 536 535 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.4 13.3 14.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 453 1304 - - 1132 - - 410 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.019 - - 0.012 - - 0.056 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.3 7.8 0 - 8.2 0 - 14.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 336 32 9 194 14 17 Future Vol, veh/h 365 32 9 205 14 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 300 300 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 11 2 7 12 Mvmt Flow 397 35 10 223 15 18 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 432 0 640 397 Stage 1 - - - - 397 - Stage 2 - - - - 243 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.21 - 6.47 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.47 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.299 - 3.563 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1081 - 432 631 Stage 1 - - - - 668 - Stage 2 - - - - 786 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1081 - 428 631 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 428 - Stage 1 - - - - 668 - Stage 2 - - - - 779 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 12.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 520 - - 1081 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 79 353 194 16 14 18 Future Vol, veh/h 79 381 204 17 15 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 0 0 2 Mvmt Flow 86 414 222 18 16 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 240 0 - 0 817 231 Stage 1 - - - - 231 - Stage 2 - - - - 586 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1339 - - - 349 808 Stage 1 - - - - 812 - Stage 2 - - - - 560 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1339 - - - 320 808 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 320 - Stage 1 - - - - 745 - Stage 2 - - - - 560 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 13.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1339 - - - 477 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - - 0.075 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - - 13.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 51 0 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 124 0 51 132 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 47 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 135 0 55 143 0 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 135 0 388 135 Stage 1 - - - - 135 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 616 914 Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 789 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1449 - 593 914 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 593 - Stage 1 - - - - 891 - Stage 2 - - - - 759 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.1 9.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 914 - - 1449 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 - - 0.038 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - - 7.6 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 346 0 0 214 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 361 0 6 231 0 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 392 0 7 251 0 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 392 0 657 392 Stage 1 - - - - 392 - Stage 2 - - - - 265 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1167 - 430 657 Stage 1 - - - - 683 - Stage 2 - - - - 779 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1167 - 427 657 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 427 - Stage 1 - - - - 683 - Stage 2 - - - - 774 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 657 - - 1167 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM 4:30 pm 07/18/2045 Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 350 0 0 210 Future Vol, veh/h 2 3 362 6 4 223 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 3 393 7 4 242 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 647 397 0 0 400 0 Stage 1 397 - - - - - Stage 2 250 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 436 652 - - 1159 - Stage 1 679 - - - - - Stage 2 792 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 434 652 - - 1159 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 434 - - - - - Stage 1 679 - - - - - Stage 2 789 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.7 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 543 1159 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.01 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.7 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS - - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 Intersection: 1: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CSAH J/Ash St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 106 127 145 Average Queue (ft) 22 59 78 44 95th Queue (ft) 54 127 133 133 Link Distance (ft) 151 1544 2058 882 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: CSAH 21/Centerville Rd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LR LT TR Maximum Queue (ft) 118 82 67 Average Queue (ft) 56 24 33 95th Queue (ft) 113 79 70 Link Distance (ft) 685 270 1709 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Monarch Way/West Access North Oaks Farms & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 37 Average Queue (ft) 1 16 95th Queue (ft) 9 44 Link Distance (ft) 1276 637 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 4: Rapp Farm Blvd & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement WB NB Directions Served L LR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 34 Average Queue (ft) 2 14 95th Queue (ft) 14 38 Link Distance (ft) 352 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: CSAH 32/Ash St & Holly Dr Movement EB SB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 37 Average Queue (ft) 19 20 95th Queue (ft) 50 43 Link Distance (ft) 1395 3443 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: South Access Wilkison/Wilkinson Lake Blvd Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 10/10/2024 10 2045 Build PM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 7: North Access Wilkison & CSAH 32/Ash St Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CSAH 32/Ash St & East Access North Oaks Farms Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix Q Appendix Q: Right-Turn Warrant Analyses Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 427 14 OUTPUT Value 29 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Right Turn Warrant - Intersection 3 EB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 252 13 OUTPUT Value 56 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Right Turn Warrant - Intersection 3 WB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 221 17 OUTPUT Value 65 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Right Turn Warrant - Intersection 5 WB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 361 1 OUTPUT Value 78 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Right Turn Warrant - Intersection 7 EB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 368 6 OUTPUT Value 2416 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Right Turn Warrant - Intersection 8 NB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year 24-30671 ASH STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LINO LAKES, MN Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Appendix R Appendix R: Left-Turn Warrant Analyses Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 5% 427 239 OUTPUT Value 522 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 3 EB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 5% 252 404 OUTPUT Value 437 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 3 WB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 18% 432 210 OUTPUT Value 306 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 5 EB - PM Peak Hour - Existing Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 17% 470 221 OUTPUT Value 309 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 5 EB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 45 1% 237 361 OUTPUT Value 1176 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Variable Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Critical headway, s: Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Average time for making left-turn, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 7 WB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 1% 231 368 OUTPUT Value 1378 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9 Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left Turn Warrant - Intersection 8 SB - PM Peak Hour - Build Year 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-167, Approving Professional Services Agreement with WSB, Winter Wetland Bank Application VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to authorize a Professional Services agreement with WSB to complete the prospectus document for wetland banking application. BACKGROUND The City has been working on the establishment of a wetland bank on approximately 138 acres located east of 35E and north of Main Street, located at 7473 24th Avenue. The council previously authorized preliminary hydrologic, survey and investigative work to develop a portion of the prospectus document. Staff is now requesting council consideration to move forward with phase 3 of the prospectus which will include the development of concept plans, the prospectus document and report along with a Phase 1 archeological assessment. WSB has submitted a proposal to complete the work for a not to exceed amount of $28,762. The project is funded from proceeds of wetland credits sales included in the Surface Water Management Fund. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 24-167. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-167 2. WSB Proposal CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-167 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WSB TO PREPARE WETLAND BANK PROSPECTUS WHEREAS, the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the establishment of wetland banks to assist with natural resource protection and as a priority to implement the goals of the City’s Local Water Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the City is considering the purchase of property located at 7473 24th Avenue for the purpose of establishing a wetland bank, and WHEREAS, preparation of a Prospectus document is a required step in the wetland bank approval process; and WHEREAS, the City previously authorized preparation of portions of the document and is proposing to complete the final phase of the Prospectus document; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the Professional Services agreement with WSB and Associates is hereby approved and authorizes staff to execute the agreement for the work in the amount of $28,762. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Winters Wetland Bank\propsectus_phase3\PROPOSAL_WintersWetlandBank_ProspectusPhase3_111424.docx 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | MI N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | WS B E N G . C O M November 22, 2024 City of Lino Lakes Mr. Michael Grochala 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Proposal for Phase 3 of Winters Wetland Bank Prospectus Dear Mr. Grochala: WSB is providing this proposal to complete the remaining tasks identified in the previous proposal dated May 4, 2023 for the Winters Wetland Bank Prospectus Phase 2 based on the previously submitted draft prospectus, feasibility study, and cost estimate completed in 2022 and the Phase 1 and 2 Prospectus Tasks completed in 2023 and 2024. Phase 1 tasks included: 1. Project management 2. Project kickoff and planning meeting (on-site) 3. Topographic Survey Via Drone/Spot Check w/ 2-person crew 4. NHIS and SHPO Data Review Requests 5. Existing Vegetation Survey/ENRV Existing Veg Releve Survey 6. Hydrology Monitoring (Installation of water level meters/data collection) All tasks were completed and we completed one (1) additional task- Onsite TEP/IRT Review Meeting in Fall of 2023 to allow the Phase 2 tasks to move forward without waiting for field season and scheduling with members of the TEP and IRT. Phase 2 tasks include: 1. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis 2. Project Management 3. 2024 Hydrology Monitoring Hydrology monitoring is nearing completion (loggers to be pulled in the next week) and task 1 is planned to be completed by Mid-November. Tasks proposed for this phase of the prospectus (Phase 3) include: 1. Project Management 2. CAD based concept plans (60%) 3. Prospectus Document Report and Application Submittal 4. Archeological Phase 1a Assessment G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Winters Wetland Bank\propsectus_phase3\PROPOSAL_WintersWetlandBank_ProspectusPhase3_111424.docx Project management includes tracking the project budget, ensuring that project tasks are being completed on time and on budget along with miscellaneous administrative tasks and meetings. Cad-based concept plans (60%) will be developed that provide a plan-based basis for TEP and IRT review and assist the project team in making design changes and modeling in preparation for submittal of the prospectus and to respond to TEP and IRT comments. These plans also form the basis for development of the mitigation banking instrument (MBI) and full bank plan. Prospectus Document Report and Application Submittal are included in one task and will be completed at the conclusion of all phase 2 and 3 tasks. Archeological Phase 1a Assessment- WSB will subcontract a qualified and experienced archeologist to complete this task, and results will be included in the prospectus documents. The Phase 1a assessment will determine if a Phase 1 field assessment needs to be completed. Phase 3 Project Schedule Project Element November December January Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 This schedule assumes that this proposal is accepted in November 2024. Phase 3 Project Budget Project Element Cost Task 1 $ 2,604 Task 2 $ 11,980 Task 3 $ 13,078 Task 4 $1,100 Project Total $28,762 G:\.Clients All\Lino Lakes\Proposals\Winters Wetland Bank\propsectus_phase3\PROPOSAL_WintersWetlandBank_ProspectusPhase3_111424.docx This Phase 3 project total (Tasks 1-4 $28,762) represents a total to be billed hourly and not to exceed unless authorized by the City of Lino Lakes. If you have any questions on this proposal or other questions related to completing the wetland bank prospectus, please email me at thavranek@wsbeng.com or call (715)417- 1190. Thank you for the opportunity to continue to collaborate with you and the City of Lino Lakes on this legacy project. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Tony Havranek Director of Fisheries/Principle ACCEPTANCE: The City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the WSB proposal of $28,762 for all services outlined in Phase 3 of this letter. City of Lino Lakes Name Title Date 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Diane Hankee, City Engineer MEETING DATE: December 9, 2024 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 24-171, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Construction Contract, Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting authorization to accept quotes and award the construction contract for the Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project located on Red Hawk Trail. BACKGROUND The City’s annual Surface Water Management Program (SWMP) addresses areas in need of maintenance, and conforms to the City’s Surface Water Pollution and Prevention Plan. For the Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project, the City will address the erosion and drainage issue on Red Hawk Trail, see enclosed map. Quotes for the project were received on December 2, 2024 and are outlined below: The low quote was submitted by C.W. Houle, Inc. of Shoreview, Minnesota, in the amount of $23,998.00. The completion date for this project is April 30, 2025. Funding for the project is through the Surface Water Utility fund. CONTRACTOR QUOTE C.W. Houle, Inc. $23,998.00 Dimke Excavating $38,350.00 Winberg Companies $34,200.90 Olson’s in the Pink Did Not Quote 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 24-171 accepting quotes and awarding a construction contract for the Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project in the amount of $23,998.00 to C.W. Houle, Inc. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 24-171 2. Project Location Map CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 24-171 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES, AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, RED HAWK TRAIL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for quotes for the construction of the Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project, quotes were received, and tabulated: WHEREAS, the low quote was submitted by C.W. Houle, Inc. of Shoreview, Minnesota, in the amount of $23,998.00; and WHEREAS, the funding for the project is through the Surface Water Utility fund; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with C.W. Houle, Inc. for the construction of the Red Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Improvement Project in the amount of $23,998.00; Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of December, 2024. ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, City Clerk CONTRACTOR QUOTE C.W. Houle, Inc. $23,998.00 Dimke Excavating $38,350.00 Winberg Companies $34,200.90 Olson’s in the Pink Did Not Quote " " " " " " " ! ! 6344 6335 6342 6346 RE D H A W K T R L Do c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 3 9 4 7 - 0 0 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ L i n o L a k e s \ L i n o L a k e s D a t e S a v e d : 1 1 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 4 ¯1 inch = 30 feet 0 30 FeetRed Hawk Trail Storm Sewer Outfall Improvements !Proposed Storm Features Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer Parcel Boundary Drainage and Utility Easement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. REMOVE COTTONWOOD TREE THAT IS LOCATED OVER FES. 2. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 12" FES WITH TRASH GUARD. 3. REMOVE 8 FEET OF 12" RCP CL V STORM SEWER PIPE. 4. INSTALL 4 FEET OF 12" RCP CL V STORM SEWER PIPE. NOTE: COST TO INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS, LABOR AND REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL BMP'S TO PERFORM THE DESCRIBED WORK. REMOVE COTTONWOOD TREE