The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-07-25 - Council Work Session Agenda CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Updated 04/03/25 Monday, April 7, 2025 City Council: Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz Interim City Administrator: Dave Pecchia COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers (Not televised) | No Public Comment allowed per the Rules of Decorum Item # Topic Time (Estimated) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 6:00 PM 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 6:00 PM 3. Administration Update 6:00 PM – 6:20 PM 4. Even-Year Elections 6:20 PM – 7:00 PM 5. Joint Meeting with the Charter Commission Overview 7:00 PM – 7:10 PM 6. Main Street Master Plan & AUAR Update 7:10 PM – 7:30 PM 7. Otter Crossing South Preliminary Plat 7:30 PM – 7:40 PM 8. Lake Ameila Ditch Study Update 7:40 PM – 7:50 PM 9. Water Treatment Plant Construction –Building Setback 7:50 PM – 8:05 PM 10. Notices and Communications, City Council 8:05 PM – 8:15 PM ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk WORK SESSION DATE: April 7, 2025 TOPIC: Even-Year Elections Background At the December 2, 2024 City Council Work Session staff requested that the City Council consider the option of moving to even-year elections to improve voter engagement and to reduce costs. There is a trend away from odd-year elections across the state as well for these reasons. At the December meeting it was the consensus of the City Council to direct the City Attorney to research the legal steps and considerations to move to an even-year election for municipal officers, for future consideration. Voter engagement is one consideration in reviewing the option to move to even-year elections. The number of registered voters at 7 a.m. on Election Day in 2024 was 15,322. • 1,785 voters participated in the last odd-year municipal election (2023) • 14,135 voters participated in the last even-year general election (2024) The cost to run an election is covered primarily by the city, with county and state costs also part of the total public cost to run and election The City of Lino Lakes budget for the 2025 municipal election is $21,367. There are some ongoing annual costs regardless of if an election is held or not and the decision to move absentee voting for 2025 to Anoka County will also reduce the City’s 2025 actual costs, however, the majority of the budget would be saved as direct result of moving to even-year elections. There has been a move by cities that have had odd-year elections in the past to transition to even-year elections. According to the Secretary of State’s Office of the 856 cities, only 18 will be conducting an odd-year election in 2025 (see the attached list of 18 cities and one township that are conducting an election in 2025). There are options for the City to consider in moving to an even-year election regarding the terms of office and maintaining the staggered terms of office. If the amendment is made effective this year and we do not hold a 2025 election the terms of office of incumbents would be extended by one year. However, if the amendment is set to become effective for a future date, then the terms of those elected in the first cycles would be adjusted to maintain the stagged dates that the different terms expire. There are two City Council seats and the office of Mayor on the municipal ballot each municipal election. Terms of office are staggered with the following current terms: • Mayor (two-year term ending 2025), • Council Member (four-year term ending 2025), • Council Member (four-year term ending 2025), • Council Member (four-year term ending 2027), and • Council Member (four-year term ending 2027). The City Attorney has stated that “One possible way to address this would be to set the effective date of the change further out in the future so that voters in the next municipal election(s) can account for a varied term length when voting on their elected officials. For example, if the change becomes effective in 2028, meaning November 2028 is the first time the City holds an even-year election, the Charter amendment could specify that Council members elected in the November 2025 election will hold their seats through 2028 (serving a three-year term – 2026-2028) and that Council members elected in the November 2027 election will hold their seats through 2030 (also serving a three-year term – 2027-2030), and that all members elected in even-year elections will hold four-year terms.” Requested Council Direction 1. Decision regarding support for a city code charter amendment to move to even- year elections. 2. If there is support for amending the city code to establish even-year elections. Make a recommendation regarding the effective date of the amendment, either 2025 or a future year. 3. Provide direction regarding City Council sponsorship of the amendment and/or submitting a request to the Charter Commission to sponsor the amendment. Attachments Secretary of State – List of Cities with Odd-Year Elections (2025) Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State–Elections Division Regularly Scheduled 2025 Elections The jurisdictions listed below will all have a regularly scheduled general election on November 4, 2025. Jurisdictions marked with an asterisk below will have a primary on August 12, 2025 if enough candidates file. The Special Elections webpage lists other elections happening on these dates. Municipal •Aurora (FIPS 2872) •Bloomington (FIPS 6616) •Circle Pines (FIPS 11494) •Duluth (FIPS 17000)* •Falcon Heights (FIPS 20420) •Golden Valley (FIPS 24308) •Hopkins (FIPS 30140) •Lino Lakes (FIPS 37322) •Mahtomedi (FIPS 39428) •Minneapolis (FIPS 43000) •Minnetonka (FIPS 43252) •Rushford (FIPS 56284) •St. Anthony (FIPS 56680) •St. Louis Park (FIPS 57220) •St. Paul (FIPS 58000) •St. Paul Park (FIPS 58018) •St. Peter (FIPS 58036) •White Bear Lake (FIPS 69970)* •White Twp (FIPS 69898) *Primary Possible Last Updated 01/28/25 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: April 7, 2025 TOPIC: Main Street Master Plan & AUAR Update ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND On March 19th the City held the 3rd Community Open House for the Mapping NW Main project. Based on comments received staff and the project team are preparing to move forward with the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) portion of the project. Two scenarios are proposed to be carried through the study. Scenario 1 is based on the existing 2040 Comprehensive Plan and is required under the AUAR process. Scenario 2.1, which focuses on the “Gateway” into Lino Lakes at the Sunset and Main Street, is also proposed for study. Kimley-Horn will present an update of the Main Street Master Plan process, and the land use scenarios proposed for AUAR review. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None requested. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. Scenario 1 2. Scenario 2.1 SCENARIO 1: “COMPREHENSIVE PLAN” Land Use NORTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528 High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533 SOUTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360 High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492 Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236 TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404 City Comprehensive Plan Full Build Out Scenario Gateway Village Scenario 2.1 PREFERRED SCENARIO 2.1: “GATEWAY VILLAGE” Land Use NORTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528 High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533 SOUTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360 High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492 Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236 TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404 City Comprehensive Plan Full Build Out Scenario Gateway Village Scenario 2.1Land Use NORTH OF MAIN STREETGross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528 High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533 SOUTH OF MAIN STREETGross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360 High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492 Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236 TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404 City Comprehensive Plan Full Build Out Scenario Gateway Village Scenario 2.1 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7 STAFF ORGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner DATE OF WORK SESSION: April 7, 2025 TOPIC: Otter Crossing South Preliminary Plat ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND At the Work Session, staff will present the April 14, 2025 Council staff report. The applicant, TYME Properties LLC, is proposing to preliminary plat one (1) commercial lot south of CSAH 14 (Main Street), east of I-35E and west of CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) for the purpose of constructing an ALDI’s grocery store. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. April 14, 2025 Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: April 14, 2025 TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 25-43 Approving Otter Crossing South Preliminary Plat VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The applicant, TYME Properties LLC, is proposing to preliminary plat one (1) commercial lot south of CSAH 14 (Main Street), east of I-35E and west of CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) for the purpose of constructing an ALDI’s grocery store. BACKGROUND The Land Use Application is for the following: • Preliminary Plat (Otter Crossing South) o 1 commercial lot This staff report is based on the following information: • Preliminary Plat Plan Set prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 18, 2025 • Vacation Exhibits prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 5, 2025 • Geotechnical Evaluation Reports prepared by Braun Intertec dated April 7, 2006, September 21, 2007 and November 4, 2024 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. dated December 7, 2022 • Traffic Study prepared by SSTS Traffic Solutions dated February 16, 2024 • Boundary/Easement Exhibit prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 6, 2023 • Certificate of Survey prepared by ISG dated January 8, 2025 • Right Turn Lane Exhibit prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 18, 2025 ANALYSIS Existing Site Conditions 2 The 28 acre site includes three (3) existing lots. One of the lots was a former bank which has been recently demolished. Per the November 4, 2024 Braun Intertec report, the site currently exists as an agricultural land, predominantly covered with grass and topsoil at the time of our borings. The site features a generally flat to gently undulating topography, with ground elevations ranging from approximately 912 feet at Boring ST-10 to 920 feet at ST-13. The slope rises gently from west to east. Historical aerial imagery indicates that the parcel has primarily been used for agricultural purposes, with no evidence of structures having been present on the site. Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The site is guided commercial per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and zoned GB, General Business. An ALDI grocery store is proposed on Lot 1/1A. A grocery store is a retail business which is a permitted use. The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development and zoning code requirements for GB, General Business with minor revisions as detailed in this staff report. Blocks and Lots The proposed preliminary plat contains the following areas: Parcel Acres Purpose Lot 1, Block 1a 1.32 acres Grocery Store Lot 1A, Block 1a 2.76 acres Grocery Store Outlot A 23.19 acres Future development Outlot B 2.23 acres Future development CR 84 (Otter Lake Rd) 0.26 acres Dedicated road right-of-way TOTAL 29.76 acres a Lot 1 is abstract property and Lot 1A is torrens property. The grocery store will be constructed on both Lots 1 and 1A and it will be treated as one lot. An additional 10ft of road right-of-way along CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) is being dedicated on the plat as required. 3 Streets and Alleys CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an A-Minor Arterial Connector county road. An existing right-in only lane will access the site from Main Street. No additional access points or driveways are allowed along this section of Main Street. CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) is a minor arterial county road. The north access into the site is 70th Street which is a private street. This will be a temporary full access road until future development of Outlot A. Then this north access will be right-in/right out and full access will be to the south. Document #487862.011 is a 60 ft wide Grant of Permanent Easement over the private street and conveyed to the City for ingress and egress, drainage and utility purposes. This easement will be vacated by separate Council action and drainage and utility easements will be provided on the final plat. Otter Lake Service Road is a public local road that will provide future access to Outlot A. There are no public streets being constructed within the development. The internal system will be private streets and drive lanes. Document #1271202.0 recorded against the property dedicates a 60ft wide public street and utility easement east-west across the property. This easement will be vacated by separate Council action. The City Council will hold the public hearing which is tentatively scheduled for April 14, 2025. A shared driveway and maintenance agreement will be required for all private streets and/or shared driveways. An access control agreement will be required for the future right-in/right-out only for the north access on Otter Lake Road. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided on the preliminary plat over Lot 1 and Lot 1A lot lines, Lot 1 and Lot 1A wetland #3 and stormwater management facilities. Public Land Dedication The City will collect cash fee in lieu of land dedication for commercial development at the time of final plat. Otter Crossing South 4.08 acres x $2,600 per acre = $10,608 4 Site and Building Plan Review A grocery store is a permitted retail use. Site and building plan review for permitted uses are completed at a staff level. The March 12, 2025 Planning & Zoning report details the review. The ALDI grocery store meets zoning code requirements regarding lot sizes, setbacks, architecture, lighting, off-street parking, and other performance standards with minor revisions. Traffic Study A Traffic Study was prepared by SSTS dated February 16, 2024. The study analyzed the following intersections: • Main St (CSAH 14) & I-35E SB Ramps • Main St (CSAH 14) & I-35E NB Ramps • Main St (CSAH 14) & Otter Lake Rd (CR 84) • Main St/Frenchman Rd/CSAH 8 & Victor Hugo Blvd • Otter Lake Rd (CR 84) & Gymnastics/Industrial Building Access • Access Locations for Build Conditions Trip Generation The study analyzed a Phase 1 development scenario that included a supermarket, fast food, and retail. The Phase 1 development is expected to generate 1,658 new weekday daily trips. The AM peak is 7:15am to 8:15am and PM peak is 4:15pm to 5:15pm. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of land use, shared trips, and pass-by trips. Pass-by trips occur when motorists already on the highway system stop at the development site prior to continuing their intended route. Level of Service 5 Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions and driver delay (measured in seconds) of an intersection. Operations are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions). City Code Section 1007.020, Site Plan Review and Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the traffic generated by the proposed development is within the capabilities of the City. EQB Environmental Review The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identifies this site as commercial in the land use scenarios. The proposed ALDI’s grocery store is consistent with commercial development. No further environmental assessment is required. Wetlands 6 The preliminary plat includes four (4) wetlands totally approximately 5.94 acres. These wetlands do not appear to be impacted and do not appear to be within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easements are required over Wetland 3 on Lot 1 and Lot 1A. The applicant will need to work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act regulations. Shoreland District The preliminary plat is not located in the Shoreland District. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Anoka County Highway Department Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the preliminary plat and their comments have been addressed. Public Safety Comments The Lino Lakes Fire Division had no comments on the preliminary plat. The Lino Lakes Police Division had no comments on the preliminary plat. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the project at their February 26, 2025 meeting. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on March 12, 2025. There were no public comments. The Board recommended approval with a 6-0 vote. Agreements Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained, and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration. 7 Development Agreement and Final Plat The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Site Improvement Performance Agreements will be required for construction of the ALDI grocery store. Comprehensive Plan The Otter Crossing South preliminary plat and commercial development are consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails. Land Use Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The preliminary plat and proposed grocery store are consistent with commercial land use. Housing Plan The goals and policies of Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the commercial development. Economic Development The commercial development supports the City’s economic development plan. Transportation Plan Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and to reduce unnecessary traffic. CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an A-Minor Arterial Connector county road. CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) is a minor arterial county road. The exiting road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the commercial development. Local Water Management Plan The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water 8 systems. The commercial development will construct stormwater management BMP’s such as curb, gutter, and stormwater ponds. Sanitary Sewer Plan The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The commercial development will be served by an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. Water Supply Plan A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The commercial development will be served with a safe and high quality water supply. Parks, Greenways and Trails A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for the one (1) new commercial lot. Findings of Fact The findings of fact are detailed in the attached resolution. Vacations Document #1271202.0 regarding the permanent easement for public streets and utility purposes and Document #487862.011 regarding the grant of permanent easement for construction purposes shall be vacated contingent upon filing of the final plat. Theses vacations will be processed in a separate staff report. The City Council will hold the public hearing on April 14, 2025. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Otter Crossing South preliminary plat. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Otter Crossing South Preliminary Plat 3. City Engineer Memo-Otter Crossing South dated April 2, 2025 (To Follow) 4. Resolution No. 25-43 Approving Preliminary Plat 35E 14 70th St 84 14 Legend Address Labels Parcels March 5, 2025m Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 300 Ft Site Location & Aerial Map-Otter Crossing SouthAttachPent 1 c 7OFOTTER CROSSING SOUTH LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TYME PROPERTIES 3435 LABORE ROAD SUITE 150 02-10-2025 PJC NJK,JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 03-18-2025 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2025 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 02-10-2024 VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 Peter J. Hawkinson 00-SURV-119015-BASE.DWG 6PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 25-43 RESOLUTION APPROVING OTTER CROSSING SOUTH PRELIMINARY PLAT WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Otter Crossing South preliminary plat (“Development”); and WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the Development based on the following submittals: • Preliminary Plat Plan Set prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 18, 2025 • Vacation Exhibits prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 5, 2025 • Geotechnical Evaluation Reports prepared by Braun Intertec dated April 7, 2006, September 21, 2007 and November 4, 2024 • Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. dated December 7, 2022 • Traffic Study prepared by SSTS Traffic Solutions dated February 16, 2024 • Boundary/Easement Exhibit prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 6, 2023 • Certificate of Survey prepared by ISG dated January 8, 2025 • Right Turn Lane Exhibit prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated March 18, 2025; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on March 12, 2025 and the Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat with a 6-0 vote. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that: FINDINGS OF FACT Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. 2 Otter Crossing South preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Otter Crossing South preliminary plat is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025). The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city’s capital improvement plan. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary rate study. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 3 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Otter Crossing South preliminary plat meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Intersections currently operate at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. Build condition overall LOS will continue to operate at a level A. The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the development is not considered premature. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Otter Crossing South preliminary plat will have an adequate water supply. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 4 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Otter Crossing South preliminary plat will be served with an adequate waste disposal system. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Otter Crossing South preliminary plat is not a premature subdivision; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Otter Crossing South preliminary plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A declaration stating Lot 1 and Lot 1A, Otter Crossing South shall be maintained together for the purposes of sale and development. 2. A shared access, parking, and maintenance agreement and exhibit shall be recorded. 3. A declaration of access control along CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) and exhibit shall be recorded. 4. Document #1271202.0 regarding the permanent easement for public streets and utility purposes shall be vacated contingent upon filing of the final plat. 5. A Quit Claim Deed related to the vacation of Document #1271202.0 shall be recorded. 6. Document #487862.011 regarding the grant of permanent easement for construction purposes shall be vacated contingent upon filing of the final plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following items shall be addressed prior to City Council approval of the Otter Crossing South final plat: 1. All comments from the City Engineer memos dated April 2, 2025. 2. A draft of the Lot 1 and Lot 1A declaration shall be submitted to the City. 3. The City Attorney shall draft the quit claim deed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________, 2025. 5 ___________________________ Rob Rafferty, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: April 7, 2025 TOPIC: Lake Ameila Ditch Study Update ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND In 2023 the City completed the Ameilia Lake Ditch study. The goal of the project was to analyze the existing drainage conditions and proposed improvement to the ditch draining to Lake Amelia. The ditch has a drainage area of approximately 255 acres. It is a private ditch, meaning that maintaining the ditch is the responsibility of the individual property owners. Based on the existing concerns and anticipated future changes to the area, two phases of work were recommended. The initial phase consisted of conveyance improvements to the ditch. The long-term phase envisioned development of a greenway and trail corridor alongside eventual development. In March, city staff met with the 6 property owners to discuss the potential for the city taking over maintenance responsibilities of the ditch and completing a maintenance project to remove accumulated sediment and removal of lower quality trees and shrubs along the banks. The overall intent of maintenance is to maintain/improve conveyance capacity and improve water quality entering Ameila Lake. City maintenance would be subject to provision of easements, by the owners, at no cost to the City. Property owners expressed some interest in the exchange but wanted some time to consider. There is currently no urgency in the matter. Staff will reach out to property owners in 2 to 3 months to gauge interest. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None requested. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. Amelia Lake Study Figures " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " "" " "" """ " "" " " " " #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( Do c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 0 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ W R M a p \ E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s D a t e S a v e d : 6 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 ¯1 inch = 500 feet 0 500FeetAmelia Ditch Drainage Study City of Lino Lakes Figure 2: Existing Conditions Existing 100-yr HWL Subcatchments Lake Amelia 100-yr HWL Contour 10 ft 2 ft 3DJH " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " "" " "" """ " "" " " " " #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( Do c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 0 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ W R M a p \ P r o p o s e d S h o r t T e r m D a t e S a v e d : 8 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 3 ¯1 inch = 500 feet 0 500FeetAmelia Ditch Drainage Study City of Lino Lakes Figure 4: Proposed Conditions - Short-Term Subcatchments Lake Amelia 100-yr HWL Settling Basin Contour 10 ft 2 ft Replace with 36" RCP Culvert and Excavate Settling Basin 3.4' HWL Decrease 0.5' HWL Decrease No HWL Decrease 0.2' HWL Decrease 0.2' HWL Decrease Remove 0.9' of Sediment from Channel Bottom Remove 0.6' of Sediment from Channel Bottom Remove 0.5' of Sediment from Channel Bottom 3DJH 35E 35E 35E " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " "" " "" """ " "" " " " " #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( 912 926 908 930 92 8 922 9 24 92 0 916 918 920 908 926 92 6 92 0 90 8 91 6 942 92 2 92 2 922 91 2 908 92 4 930 92 0 936 928 936 928 900 932 9 0 8 9 34 92 4 910 906 9 1 4 92 4 9 3 0 910 932 926 898 92 6 9 2 2 9 24 9 2 8 952 9 2 0 930 914 9 3 0 912 914 91 4 92 6 91 2 912 910 93 4 93 2 91 0 90 4 9 2 6 918 92 8 92 8 91 0 93 2 926 90 0 90 2 910 91 0 92 0 9 24 914 92 8 938 93 4 918 91 4 92 6 92 8 9 08 92 4 91 0 94 4 940 924 9 1 6 9 2 4 9 5 4 92 8 91 6 9 1 6 9 1 8 908 9 3 4 924 93 0 9 22 922 9 14 93 4 91 6 91 4 904 92 0 9 3 2 9 1 8 918 9 3 2 93 4 92 6 94 2 9 2 8 92 4 918 92 2 92 8 9 3 0 93 6 95 0 92 6 922 91 8 91 6 93 0 934 9 3 2 924 920 906 9 1 8 9 3 6 900 9 30 934 930 926 92 2 92 2 92 4 924 92 8 930 926 928 898 928 908 9 2 6 926 928 91 8 92 4 928 91 8 912 912 928 918 9 3 2 91 0 92 4 9 24 91 6 924 924 926 932 942 9 1 6 92 8 934 934 926 93 0 924 93 2 9 02 924 92 6 912 94 8 924 92 2 91 8 91 8 940 922 9 2 2 91 2 934 932 926 918 93 8 908 908 93 8 912 926 912 928 92 8 928 93 0 926 932 91 0 93 2 930 9 1 8 9 2 2 92 6 9 2 4 916 9 0 4 9 24 916 926 928 938 946 90 0 942 916 94 8 928 93 0 9 24 9 1 2 9 28 922 924 91 6 912 910 930 930 9 3 0 9 28 900 91 4 942 922 9 24 930 9 3 2 916 93 4 934 918 930 9 32 936 930 938 9 26 912 9 1 0 920 9 26 924 93 8 914 930 914 926 94 0 928 9 3 4 924 924 898 9 2 6 932 932 916 938 920 90 4 9 2 8 924 926 920 916 922 92 8 9 1 4 93 2 93 4 92 0 932 9 34 910 930 916 922 930 92 8 926 916 9 14 9 2 8 900 930 91 2 940 928 91 8 920 914 9 3 0 934 9 22 934 94 0 9 5 4 944 914 928 9 28 908 940 9 22 912 9 2 4 9 1 4 930 926 9 2 2 912 926 918 9 30 94 0 910 9 1 2 938 924 922 920 912 9 28 930 910 912 9 4 4 910 924 918 91 4 938 920 92 4 9 30 928 92 8 92 0 912 918 9 02 918 926 902 9 3 6 932 92 2 932 928 934 93 0 910 934 930 9 3 4 932 9 2 4 9 2 4 926 916 91 4 928 932 948 92 4 9 2 0 930 928 900 91 4 928 928 926 914 92 2 926 912 94 0 916 9 2 8 9 3 6 928 914 9 2 4 912 93 0 918 93 2 9 1 2 92 2 92 0 932 926 91 4 9 14 920 9 2 4 926 910 918 9 2 8 9 3 4 918 932 938 928 9 2 4 922 9 26 920 9 38 924 934 92 2924 930 9 3 6 926 936 928 930 9 1 6 92 6 926 902 914 928 930 920 924 9 2 0 930 918 91 6 928 930 926 930 9 2 4 9 1 6 914 930 928 9 28 924 9 2 8 9 22 914 910 928 952 916 924 9 2 6 9 2 2 9 1 6 9 1 4 934 926 926 9 4 2 920 940 912 93 2 932 914 920930 914 9 2 2 934 93 8 926 9 1 4 924 944 92 4 910 918 936 92 2 928 922 92 8 928 916 924 946 924 93 2 936 93 2 9 2 6 922 9 2 6 9 3 4 910 91 8 9 42 918 918 934 930 928 9 5 0 9 32 9 4 0 908 926 9 3 2 9 2 2 91 8 926 932 93 2 91 0 93 0 924 900 924 916 948 93 0 93 0 932 924 9 46 918 92 0 922 92 8 916 914 930 91 6 9 44 930 930 928 930 93 2 92 8 932 902 9 3 0 930 926 9 42 920 9 40 918 926 91 2 908 906 934 908 93 4 9 3 8 91 8 924 938 936 926 928 910 9 1 0 920 926 93 6 90 8 910 928 920 912 904 934 914 9 2 6 930 930 928 926 916 9 3 2 9 1 8 928 928 920 922 910 9 1 0 9 1 2 922 920 918 9 1 0 918 924 914 916 926 928 916 924 92 2 914 914 9 1 6 920 9 18 922 926 912 924 Do c u m e n t P a t h : K : \ 0 2 0 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 \ G I S \ M a p s \ W R M a p \ P r o p o s e d L o n g T e r m D a t e S a v e d : 6 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 3 ¯1 inch = 500 feet 0 500FeetAmelia Ditch Drainage Study City of Lino Lakes Figure 5: Proposed Conditions - Long-Term Proposed BMPs Proposed Meandered Channel Subcatchments Proposed 100-yr HWL Lake Amelia 100-yr HWL Contour 10 ft 2 ft South Filtration Basin North Filtration Basin Wetland 1 Wetland 2 Wetland 3 Page 15 K: \ 0 2 0 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 \ G r a p h i c s \ 0 2 0 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 A m e l i a D i t c h Amelia Ditch Concept Plan Lino Lakes, MN July 21, 2023 | WSB Project number: 020018-000 Scale in Feet 0’400’200’ AMELIA LAKE PROPOSED TRAIL PROPOSED CHANNEL ROUTE PLUNGE POOL OT T E R L A K E R D 20 T H A V E S BIRCH STREET PROPOSED WETLAND PROPOSED FILTRATION BASIN EXISTING FLOOD PLAIN EXISTING WETLAND TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION 10’ TRAIL DISTANCE VARIES WATER CHANNEL 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 9 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: April 7, 2025 TOPIC: Water Treatment Plant Construction - North Building Setback. ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND Construction of the Water Treatment Plant has been progressing steadily over the past six months. To date, the raw water mains along Birch Street have been installed and relocation of the sanitary sewer and water main across the site has been completed. Construction of the clearwell tank and backwash tanks are nearly complete. However, WSB has informed staff that do to a coordinate error the clearwell structure encroaches approximately 4 feet into the Birch Street front yard setback. This reduced the building setback from 50’ to 46’ from the Birch Street right-of-way. Approximately 36’ of building remains to be constructed along this same line to the west. The balance of the building to the east jogs to the south and will meet the 50’ setback. Upon notification of the error, City staff requested WSB complete an additional Quality Assurance/Quality Control review of all plans to ensure that no additional complications would result from the shift. A memo from WSB outlining how the error originated and how it impacts site development is attached. Representatives of WSB will be present at the meeting to discuss the issue. Based on the WSB review it appears that the primary issue will be conformance with the zoning code. The property is in the PSP, Public/Semi Public zoning district. The setback from a major collector or arterial street is 50 feet. Fortunately, the setback encroachment is facing Birch Street, which has a much wider right-of-way than typical local roads. The total right-of-way width for Birch Street is 120’. Additionally, the 46’ is still greater than the typical 40’ arterial road setback required for adjacent properties in the area including Wellhouse No. 3, located immediately to the west. The following options are available to the City to remedy the situation: 2 1) Demo and relocate the structure. Staff does not recommend this option due to the magnitude of the cost and project delay in doing so. Modifying just the unbuilt portion to the west would require major redesign, not only of the building footprint, but reconfiguration of the internal process components and piping. 2) Grant a Variance. The City would need to establish findings meeting the criteria for granting a variance. 3) Amend the Zoning Ordinance requirement in the PSP District. The City could propose and amendment to the PSP Zoning District to reduce the required setback from street right-of-way. Given that the City’s public works facility property is also zoned PSP, along with the County park and campground there may be value in reviewing the district standards to better complement those uses. 4) Modify the County Road easement boundary. The setback line, in this case, is defined as the required minimum distance from the street right-of-way line. The City property extends out into Birch Street. The City has granted a public right-of-way easement to the County over a portion of the property. It may be possible to reduce the right-of-way easement by four feet to reestablish the setback line at 50’. The City could then grant a drainage and utility easement to the County to cover the reduction in right-of-way width. Except for option 4 the City Council is the sole determining party. Staff is continuing to evaluate these options. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff is requesting City Council direction regarding a preferred course of action. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Plan 17 8 E A S T 9 T H S T R E E T | S U I T E 2 0 0 | S T . P A U L , M N | 5 5 1 0 1 | 6 5 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, City of Lino Lakes Dave Pecchia, Interim City Administrator, City of Lino Lakes From: Jon Christensen, PE, WSB Date: March 31, 2025 Re: North Building Setback - Water Treatment Plant WSB Project No. 021336-000 The City’s new Water Treatment Plant (WTP) building, located at 6590 12th Ave S, was intended to have a 50’ setback from the right-of-way boundary on Birch Street and on 12th Ave S. The actual building currently under construction has a 46’ setback from the right-of-way boundary on Birch Street. The purpose of this memo is to outline the cause of the issue and how it impacts site development. Water Treatment Plant Building Setback: The WTP building (and associated sitework) shift was caused by a data conversion process error at the start of the design phase of the project. For the purposes of background information, Minnesota counties use a geographic coordinate system that is different than the geographic coordinate system surveyors use (NAD 1983). In order to align these two different coordinate systems, a custom “geographic transformation” is required. Standard procedure for the survey crew would then be to use the coordinates “transformed” to NAD 1983 and then stake the building corners for construction. For the WTP project, this “geographic transformation” was inadvertently not applied, causing the parcel linework to be shifted in the design files at the beginning of the design process and ultimately staked in the field accordingly. Essentially, this data conversion issue has caused the building and sitework (parking lot, etc.) to be shifted and constructed 4’ to the north and 0.42’ to the east of the original planned location. Thus, impacting the allowable building setback on the north side of the site (46’ vs. 50’). All other setback requirements associated with the site will not be impacted by the coordinate shift. The schedule of events related to the building setback issue are provided as follows: - February 19th - Data inconsistency issue was discovered when WSB staff was developing a plan for a “test well” on the property. Discovery regarding the issue followed. - February 26th - WSB survey crew was sent to the site to collect data and verify the location of the WTP building. Discovery regarding the issue followed. - March 14th - Determined that “geographic transformation” issue discussed above had caused the shift on the WTP Site. - March 19th – Jon Christensen informed Michael Grochala of the issue at the WTP site. Sitework Impact: As part of the proposed WTP construction, a large cast-in-place concrete clearwell tank has already been constructed on the site (below grade). The above grade exterior wall now Michael Grochala and Dave Pecchia 3/31/25 Page 2 constructed and visible on the site is aligned with and set on top of the clearwell tank wall at a 46’ setback from Birch Street. The slope on the north side of the WTP building will be impacted by the coordinate shift. The slope down to the ditch along the south side of Birch Street will be slightly steeper than originally planned, yet will be shallower than the City’s maximum allowed 3:1 slope. This will not impact ladder access on the north side of the building. The proposed parking lot for the WTP building is similarly shifted 4’ to the north, however, this will still meet the setback requirement of 15’. The shift to the east was minimal (0.42’) and will not impact allowable setbacks. Verification of WTP Related Exhibits: The following exhibits were prepared separately, using the correct parcel linework, and WSB has verified that they are unaffected by the coordinate shift. • Certificate of Survey • Lot Split • Utility Easement Vacation • Right of Way Easement • Public Drainage System Easement • Conservation Easement • Wetland Buffer • Legal Descriptions • Raw Watermain Plan and Profile A sketch showing the WTP Site and the building shift and setback issues is attached. W E T W E T W E T WE T W E T WET WET W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WETWET WET WE T WET WET MB VLT RIM: 901.76 INV: 881.57 N INV: 881.57 S INV: 881.57 E INV: 894.00 SW (DROP) 44" INV: 882.48 W S RIM: 904.25 INV: 882.41 N INV: 884.50 N-NW INV: 883.64 N-NW INV: 888.89 NW (DROP) INV: 884.65 W INV: 882.41 E S RIM: 908.10 INV: 882.00 S INV: 882.00 W RIM: 897.75 INV: 892.90 N (DROP) INV: 888.60 W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F S S S S S SS OH OH OH E E E OH OH OH F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FF F F F F F F F FFF F F F F F F F F F FFFF F F F F OH F F F G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G GRATE: 906.00 FL SCREEN: 909.75 N (VERT. ELBOW) INV: 890.00 W RIM 904.00 INV: 894.00 S INV: 895.00 E INV: 896.50 NE DTLDTL DT L DT L DT L DT L DT L DTLDTLDTLDTL DTL DTL DT L DT L DTL DTL DT L DTLDTL C.O. INV: 898.30 C.O. INV. 901.50 RIM: 892.30 INV: 888.51 E INV: 888.51 SW ST ST ST OCS RIM: 889.00 DT INV: 885.80 W INV: 885.80 (SEE DETAIL B/CD-04) DT L DTL DTL C.O. INV. 885.80 DTL C.O. INV. 885.80 DTL C.O. INV. 885.80DTL C.O. INV. 885.80 FFE 909.50 FFE 905.50 FFE 905.50ST RIM 905.10 INV: 900.50 N INV: 901.20 E INV: 898.50 SW C.O. INV: 890.20 TOS 904.50 TOS 905.50 C.O. INV. 901.50 C.O. INV. 901.50 RIM 904.50 INV: 899.00 W E E E OH O H 24 7 ' SCALE IN FEET 0 N 8040 BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBIT C-01 STORMWATER POND (SEE DETAIL A/CD-04) WATER FILL STATION SEE DETAIL A/PD-07 WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER REMOVAL (SEE SHEET D-01) PARKING (SEE SHEET C-04) 79'145' PROTECT 44" OAK TREE PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE 05 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 SHOWN 021336-000 WSB PROJECT NO.: SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , OR R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y DI R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y LI C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E LA W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . LI C . N O : DA T E : RE V I S I O N S NO . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N WA T E R T R E A T M E N T PL A N T CI T Y O F L I N O L A K E S , MI N N E S O T A K: \ 0 2 1 3 3 6 - 0 0 0 \ C a d \ E x h i b i t s \ 2 0 2 5 . 0 4 . 0 2 P a r c e l E x h i b i t s \ 0 2 1 3 3 6 - 0 0 0 - C - P R C L - E X B T . d w g 4/ 3 / 2 0 2 5 2 : 0 8 : 1 0 P M JSC SGNWWS 57 8 1 4 JO N A T H A N S . C H R I S T E N S E N , P . E . 1 05 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 4 AD D E N D U M N O . 1 51 ' TRANSFORMER & GENERATOR (SEE SHEET E-01)LEGEND > > EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURE PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURE S S PROPOSED BITUMINOUS (EDGE) EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE>> UTILITY EASEMENT 1200 PROPOSED GRADE LINE CORRECT TRANSFORMED PARCEL UTILITY EASEMENT CENTERLINE EXISTING GRADE LINE EXISTING BITUMINOUS (EDGE)F G C E || E ST EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE EXISTING COMMUNICATION LINE EXISTING ELECTRIC POWER LINE EXISTING GAS LINE 965.77 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION X X EXISTING FENCE EXISTING SANITARY GRAVITY MAIN> PROPOSED SANITARY GRAVITY MAIN EXISTING SANITARY FORCEMAINFM PROPOSED SETBACKS FM SILT FENCESF PROPOSED DRAIN TILE PIPEDTL 50' DELINEATED WETLAND AREA BUFFER 25' DELINEATED WETLAND AREA BUFFER WET WET WETWET DELINEATED WETLAND AREA WITHIN PROPOSED TRACT FEMA FLOODPLAIN AREA RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FLOODPLAIN AREA ||PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED SANITARY FORCEMAIN PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER BIOROLL PROPOSED RIP RAPINCORRECT UNTRANSFORMED PARCEL BOUNDARIES BOUNDARIES 80' ENTRANCE AND DRIVEWAY (SEE SHEET C-04) DRAIN TILE (SEE SHEET C-02) 520' RAW WATERMAIN FROM WELLS 1, 3, 5 & 6 (SEE SHEETS C-08 & C-09) STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C-13) WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER (SEE SHEET C-02) RETAINING WALL 40' PARCEL AREA: 258,104 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA: 38,922 SF (15%) PERVIOUS AREA: 219,182 SF (85%) STORMWATER CONTROL (SEE SHEET C-02) REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE 1 4 07 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 4 PR - 1 4 4 4 6 09 / 1 3 / 2 0 2 4 RF I 0 0 1 6 8 09 / 2 4 / 2 0 2 4 RF I 0 0 5 - G R A D I N G 16 04 / 0 2 / 2 0 2 5 FI E L D O R D E R N O . 5 16 16 0.4' 4.8' 24.8' 18.6' 52.7' 46' PARCEL TRANSFORMATION SETBACK (TYP.)