The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-05-25 - Council Work Session Agenda CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, May 5, 2025 Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz Interim City Administrator: Dave Pecchia COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (Not televised) | No Public Comment allowed per the Rules of Decorum Item # Topic Time (Estimated) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 6:00 PM 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 6:00 PM 3. Option to hold Local Board of Appeal & Equalization or 6:00 – 6:20 PM Open Book Meeting, Alex Guggenberger, Anoka Co. Assessor 4. Natures Refuge North PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 6:20 - 6:50 PM 5. Wilkinson Waters PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 6:50 - 7:20 PM 6. Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant 7:20 – 7:35 PM 7. Birchwood Acres Pond Treatment 7:35 – 7:50 PM 8. I-35E Joint Powers Agreement 7:50 – 8:00 PM 9. Special Assessment Senior Deferral Code Update 8:00 – 8:10 PM 10. Liquor License Fees 8:10 - 8:20 PM 11. Administration Update 8:20 – 8:35 PM 12. Notices and Communications, City Council 8:35 – 8:45 PM ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Item 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Local Board of Appeal & Equalization / Open Book Meeting ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION This evening the City Council is scheduled to hold the Local Board of Appeal & Equalization prior to the City Council Work Session. There is another alternative to this meeting, the Open Book meeting. The County Assessor has been invited to attend tonight’s Work Session to review the two options for the consideration of the City Council. Several cities in Anoka County have moved to the Open Book format. BACKGROUND The Local Board of Appeal & Equalization is a forum for property owners to appeal their valuation or classification. It operates at the city level, and appeals must be made to the Local Board before proceeding to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The Open Book meeting is hosted by the County and the Assessing Department meets with property owners as part of this process. The advantage of the Open Book meeting is that property owners can attend the County Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting without having to attend the Open Book meeting, thereby extending the time for property owners to submit their next level of appeal. They are otherwise required to attend the date specific Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting to appeal the decision to the County Board of Appeal & Equalization. If there is interest in moving to an Open Book meeting format, Council action preferably by resolution, is required to designate an Open Book meeting format for future years. If after moving to an Open Book meeting the Council would like to return to holding a Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting, that can be re-established at the request of the City. The County Assessor has indicated that a valuation report can be submitted and/or presented to the City Council, at the request of the Council, if we move to an Open Book meeting format. RECOMMENDATIONS Review options for holding a Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting or an Open Book meeting. ATTACHMENTS None 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 4 STAFF ORGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director DATE OF WORK SESSION: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Natures Refuge North ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND At the Work Session, staff will present the May 12, 2025, Council staff report, attached in draft form. The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, has submitted an application for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD), PUD Preliminary Plan (PPP), Preliminary Plat (PP) approvals. The project proposes to create 93 lots on 60 acres located north of Natures Refuge and is called Natures Refuge North. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025, and recommended approval with several conditions. Primary discussion at the work session will be recommendations regarding: 1. Building Design flexibility 2. Connection to Andall Street. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. May 12, 2025 draft Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: May 12, 2025 TOPIC: Natures Refuge North i. Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. XX-25, Rezoning Property from R-X, Rural Executive to PUD, Planned Unit Development ii. Consider Resolution No. 25-XX, Approving PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat, Natures Refuge North VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. XX-25 from R-X, Rural Executive to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Resolution No. XX-25, PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat approval. Review schedule: Complete Application Date: March 12, 2025 60-Day Review Deadline: May 11, 2025 60-Day Extension Deadline: July 10, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: March 26, 2025 Park Board Meeting: April 2, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: April 9, 2025 City Council Work Session: May 5, 2025 City Council Meeting: May 12, 2025 BACKGROUND 2 The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, originally submitted a land application for PUD Concept Plan (“concept plan”) review in October of 2023. The proposed development, called Natures Refuge North, includes 2 parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres located immediately north of the Natures Refuge development. In addition to advisory board and City Council review a neighborhood meeting was held on February 6, 2024. Concerns raised during the review process included development density, proximity of new housing to existing Arena Acres neighborhood, traffic and safety concerns with connection to Andall Street, impact on trees, wetlands and wildlife and garage sizes. Based on comments received from advisory boards, City Council review and the neighborhood meeting a revised concept was received in July of 2024. The revised concept plan application reduced the number of lots by 16 (converting them all to 60-foot-wide villa lots), increased the buffer to Arena Acres by at least 110 feet, reduced the proposed tree removal, and reduced the net density by 0.38 units per acre. The concept plan was reviewed by the City’s Advisory Boards and City Council. The applicant has now submitted a PUD Preliminary Plan (PPP), Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD for consideration. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Narrative prepared by M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul dated March 5, 2025 • Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated April 25, 2025 • Land Use Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Sanitary Sewer Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Net Area Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Phasing Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Surface Water Area Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Ghost Plat unnamed and undated ANALYSIS Current Proposal The proposed development includes 93 villa home lots designed for empty nesters and seniors looking for single level living with association maintenance. Project Phasing The project is proposed to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 includes approximately XX lots with the extension of Haywood Drive and Street D. Phase 2 will include the balance of the development along Street A, northwest of the pipeline. Existing Conditions 3 The property is wooded with aspens dominating the canopy intermixed with birch, oak, maple, and red pine. Approximately 10 acres remain in agricultural use. Wetlands are located on site, including wetlands located withing the Rice Creek Watershed District Wetland Management Corridor. A natural gas pipeline crosses the property diagonally from the northeast corner to the southwest. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve South PUD, Planned Unit Development Single Family Residential Low Density Residential East R-1, Single Family Residential Undeveloped Low Density Residential West R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve Comprehensive Plan Per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan the site is guided for low density residential. This land use provides for housing at densities ranging from 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre that is served by municipal sewer and water services. The proposed net density is 2.99 units per acre, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s guided land use and density range. The following chart implements Met Council’s formula for calculating net density. Apr 2025 Gross Area (acres) 59.30 Wetlands & Water Bodies (5.31) Public Parks & Open Space (19.14) Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (3.38) Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 31.47 4 # of Units 94* Gross Density (units/acre) 1.59 Net Density (units/acre) 2.99 *Assumes conversion of Outlot E to a single family lot Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R-X, Rural Executive Current Land Use Agricultural/woodland Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Low Density Residential Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) The property is currently zoned R-X, Rural Executive. The R-X zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to develop the site. The property will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development to implement a conservation development by allowing for zoning flexibility. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Conventional Zoning Requirements vs. PUD Guidelines Per City Code Section 1007.024(4) for PUD, Planned Unit Development, the development guidelines for land guided low density residential development are either R-1, R-1X, or R-2. The following chart compares the R-2, Two Family Residential zoning requirements to the proposed development. Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Proposed Villa Lots PUD Flexibility Requested? Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet 7,651 square feet (Average lot size is 9,266 SF) No 5 Minimum Lot Width (interior lot) 60 feet 60 feet No Minimum Lot Width (corner lot) 80 feet 70 feet Yes Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125-165 feet No Minimum Front Setback 25 feet 25 feet No Minimum Side Setback 10 feet (5 feet for Attached Garage) 7.5 feet Yes Minimum ROW Setback (corner lots) 25 feet 20 feet Yes Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet No Impervious Surface 65% 65% No Collector Road Right- of-Way Width 80 feet 60 feet Yes Garage Size Minimum 20 feet in width and 520 square feet in size 21 – 24 and 528 to 600 SF No Garage Design Garage shall not protrude forward of the front wall of the house, unless the house includes a front porch that is unenclosed, a minimum of six (6) feet in depth, and extends across 100 percent of the front façade of the house. The garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch. The applicant is requesting allowance to protrude up to 5’ in front of the house. Of the 34 house elevations proposed by the applicant – 6 elevations protrude in front of house. Yes Garage Design The length of the garage wall facing the street shall not be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front façade of the structure for street- facing garage doors Garage walls shall not be greater than 58 percent of the length of the entire front facade. Yes PUD Flexibility Provided: 6 Collector road right of way. The right-of-way width of Haywood drive (Street C) will be reduced from 80’ to 60’ along Haywood Drive (Street C). This is consistent with previous flexibility to applied to the Natures Refuge to the south. The reduction in width minimizes the development footprint and increases the area of preservation. Sidewalk will still be included within the 60’ right-of-way to accommodate pedestrians. Cul de sac length. The cul de sac length of Street D is proposed at 620’. 500’ is the maximum length allowed. The street will be 32 feet wide instead of typical 30’ and include hydrants and midpoint and end of cul de sac. Corner Lot width and Corner Setback. The applicant has requested a reduction in Corner Lot width from the required 80’ to 70’ and Corner Lot setback from 25’ to 20’. Corner lot widths are generally wider to accommodate building setbacks from both streets and provide uniformity between lots fronting different streets. The city has generally allowed for reduced width and setback where corner lots back up to another corner lot or open space. Staff is supportive of this request. Side Setbacks. Side yard setbacks will be 7.5’ instead of the typical 10’ and 5. This maintains a uniform side yard setback between homes. Garage Requirements. The applicant originally requested flexibility from the garage area (520 SF), width (20’), and garage architectural design standards. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended that no flexibility be granted. The applicant has revised plans to meet or exceed both the garage area and garage width requirements. However, they continue to request flexibility to allow the garage to protrude 5’ in front of the house without the front porch requirement. They also request flexibility on the maximum length of the garage wall facing the street from 50% of the front façade width to a maximum of 57%. The garage architectural requirements are intended to minimize the visual impact of garage dominated streetscapes and avoid monotony on narrow lots of the R-2 zoning district. Of the 34 home different elevations proposed by M/I, only six include the protruding garage. Given the number of architectural choices the concern over a repetitive layouts being used throughout the development is minimized. However, there is no specific requirement that would prevent this. With the expansion of the maximum garage width percentage all of the houses to accommodate the garage size adjustments. The villas are intended to provide single level living so a majority of units do not provide the 2nd level living space required to exceed the 50% maximum garage length. With the increase to 57% all products would comply and the developer would agree to meet all the same requirements including: 7 • Decorative garage doors with a strip of windows • Garage width in excess of two stalls will be recessed two feet from the main garage facade. • Total garage width will not exceed 32 feet. Subdivision Ordinance Conservation Development Per City Code Section 1007.007: Subdivision Ordinance Definitions CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT. The development pattern and technique whereby lots are arranged in closely related groups to preserve the natural amenities of the land through the creation of common open space. Natures Refuge North is a proposed conservation development. The villa lots preserve woodland and wetland areas, create more protected accessible public open space and establish the greenway corridor. The trail system is also incorporated into the greenway system vs. along the street creating a more enjoyable, safer, and valued recreational experience. The purpose of using the PUD zoning is to create a conservation development that establishes the defined public values of preserving and enhancing the on-site natural resources. The PUD also creates and enhances the greenway corridor and trails that are accessible to the public. Blocks and Lots The proposed development contains 93 single family lots and 5 outlots. The outlots contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Outlot E, located on the northern end of the plat, meets the size requirement of an R-2 lot but cannot be constructed upon without a grading easement from the property to the north. This outlot shall be platted as a lot bringing the total single family lot count to 94. Staff Comments: 1. City Code Section 1007.024 (5)(c) requires that if a PUD includes preservation of natural habitat those areas shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement with the City. The proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. 2. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. 8 Streets and Alleys Haywood Drive is identified as a minor collector road in the Transportation Plan and provides a north-south corridor from CSAH 14 (Main Street) to eventually Pine Street. All proposed street right-of-way widths are 60ft and the street is proposed to be 32ft wide from back of curb to back of curb. Street B is recommended to connect to Andall Street. Arena Acres was platted in 1981 and a 60 ft wide Outlot B was platted for future road connection to the east. This outlot is owned by the City. The extension will connect the neighborhoods and transportation system. This street connection is further supported by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. This standard transportation practice has been implemented throughout the City such as the Foxbourough connection to Fox Road, Saddle Club connection to Fox Road and the St. Clair Estates connection to Hokah Drive and Sioux Lane. The Andall Street connection is supported by Lino Lakes Public Safety-Police Division and Fire Division in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response to the entire area. The connection is also supported by Public Works to provide better efficiency for street maintenance and snow plowing. Sidewalks are proposed on the east side of Haywood Drive and Street A and the south side of Street C. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D. A trail is proposed to connect to the trail in Natures Reserve to the south through the stormwater ponds south of Street D to the eastern edge of the property across Street C and then north between the wetlands and across the gas easement to the northern property line. Before the trail reaches the northern property line, a trail connection is constructed west to Street A between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2. The maximum length of a cul-de-sac is 500 ft. Street D cul de sac is 620 ft. The street will be 32 ft wide (vs 30 ft wide) and a sidewalk shall be installed. Public safety is in approval with the cul de sac length. 9 Staff Comments: 1. A temporary turnaround will be required at the north end of Street A. 2. Sidewalks shall be included on Street B and Street D. 3. The trail corridor between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 and east of Lots 1-4 Block 4 shall be widened to 30 feet wide. 4. Andall Street connection can be reduced to 24 feet wide. Easements and Outlots The applicant has provided 10 feet wide drainage and utility easements along the right-of-ways and along the rear property lines. 5 feet wide drainage and utility easements are provided along the side property lines to provide a total easement wide of 10 feet through both side yard easements, while where a stormwater utility pipe will be located between two lots, the applicant has provided 10 feet wide drainage and utility easements to accommodate the infrastructure. Drainage and utility easements will be dedicated over Outlots A, B, C and D. Outlots A, B, C and D will be owned and maintained by the development homeowner’s association (HOA). As stated above, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. There is a 100-foot-wide gas line easement that runs from southwest to northeast through Outlots A and C. A city lift station will be located with a portion of Outlot D at the intersection of Street C and Street D. Since the lift station will be owned and maintained by the City, this area should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. A conservation easement will be required for all protected open space areas (Outlots a, b, c and d). 10 Staff Comments: 1. The portion Outlot D that is occupied by the lift station should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. 2. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over Outlots a, b, c and d. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The Preliminary Plat shows three stormwater ponds, one within Outlot C to the east of Block 2 and two located within Outlot D located to the south Block 4. The proposed trail runs between the two stormwater ponds within Outlot D and the southern of the two ponds will connect and expand the existing stormwater pond within Natures Reserve. Revisions submitted on April 28th show the addition of a stormwater retention area northwest of Street A to address Rice Creek Watershed and City Engineer comments. Utilities Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. Water and sanitary will extend north along Haywood Drive. Water main is also proposed to be extended to Andall Street as part of the road construction. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub-district 2K). Flow is collected southward to MCES Meter M211 and Gravity Interceptor 8361 along North Road which passes southwest through Circle Pines. PID# 05-31-22-42-0003 is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and PID#05-31-22-13- 0001 is located in 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the one (1) parcel from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025). A sanitary sewer lift station is located along Haywood Street, east of Street D. This will provide service to the development as well as future service to the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. Proposed water use is within the capabilities of the City’s existing water supply. The project will include a stormwater reuse irrigation system that will significantly reduce water use and impact on maximum day demands. Weekly summer water savings are estimated at 487,000 gallons. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan 11 Per the City’s 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan, this development is within the Arena Acres and Wollan Park service areas. Arena Acres is a smaller 1-acre neighborhood park. Wollan’s Park is an 18-acre open space wetland and not an active park. The Plan indicates a Future Neighborhood Park centrally located within the service area. Greenway corridors exist on site. Linear trails are proposed to provide connectivity to the existing Nature’s Refuge trail to the south and a future trail connection when the property to the north is developed. The trail locations through open space and stormwater provide for a multifunctional greenway corridor. Staff Comments: 1. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30ft wide. Tree Preservation and Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and vegetation stands while not interfering with landowners’ reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey was performed that identified: April 2025- PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat Total Trees Surveyed 6009 Trees Removed (BUA) 2234 Trees Removed (non-BUA) 1262 Trees Preserved 2375 Mitigation Trees Required 292 The majority of trees on site are aspen with a mix of birch, oak, maple, and red pine. As discussed at the October 2024 meeting the applicant is proposing to dedicate approximately 34 acres of open space for tree preservation and future management. The applicant agrees to plant a minimum of 3 trees per lot throughout the development. One boulevard tree is required per lot. Staff will work with the developer on the two remaining trees to ensure that there isn’t conflict with infrastructure and overplanting. 12 Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have been met with the dedication of open space for preservation. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. Topsoil salvaged from the area prior to construction will be spread over the new ponds and open space. The established seed bank should provide native species to thrive along with native seed mix. To allow sunlight and promote growth of the existing rare and unique species onsite, minimal tree planting is being requested throughout the open space. Sparce plantings of oaks will be planted within open space areas adjacent to the stormwater ponds. A revised landscape plan will be required detailing location and species. No planting within the existing pipeline easement and proposed storm sewer pipe locations are allowed. Rare, Unique, or Significant Resources An initial habitat assessment was conducted by MNR in September 2023 after which follow-up surveys for the 2024 field season were recommended. Accordingly, MNR completed surveys in May and July 2024 resulting in observations during the early and mid-growing seasons. In total six species of threatened or endangered species were found onsite and are listed in the table below: Species Classification Rubus fulleri Threatened Rubus semisetosus Threatened Trichophorum clintonii Threatened Viola lanceolata Threatened Rubus stipulates Endangered Carex pallescens Endangered A take permit application has been submitted to DNR for proposed impacts to onsite protected plant species. Opportunities for transplant of some species to the adjacent Wollan’s Park wetland bank with approval from the DNR. Stockpiling and using existing topsoil onsite will help preserve native plant communities and possibly extend the range of threatened species. Environmental Review Record 13 As previously noted, in 2006 a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the original Natures Refuge concept because the proposed 278 housing units exceeded the 250 housing unit threshold. The EAW thoroughly analyzed potential impacts to wetlands, rare plant and animal species, floodplain, water quality, noise, traffic and archeology. It was determined the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects and the Council passed Resolution No. 07-06 making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an EIS. The scope and size of the existing Natures Refuge and revised Natures Refuge North (152 housing units on 155 gross acres) is smaller than the original 2006 proposal (278 housing units on 232 gross acres). A revised EAW is not required because the 152 housing units do not exceed the 250 housing unit threshold. # Lots Acres Natures Refuge 60 95 Natures Refuge North 94 60 TOTAL 154 155 Wetlands Per the Wetland Delineation Report, sixteen (16) wetlands were delineated on site, totaling 7.17 acres. As shown within the Preliminary Plat: April 2025 Total Wetlands 7.17 acres Total Wetland Impacts 1.93 acres WMC Wetland Buffer (Ave. 50ft) 4.54 acres City Wetland Buffer (10ft min.) 0.64 acres For the 1.93 acres of wetland impact, the developer will need to obtain 2.43 acres of wetland replacement. Some of the delineated wetlands are in the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Wetland Management Corridor. Wetlands preserved on site will have to meet RCWD and City buffer requirements. Impacts will require mitigation and will be reviewed by RCWD. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. 14 Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by SSTS, dated October 15, 2024, and revised March 28, 2025. The study analyzed two design years: • Year 2027 to correspond to the year after completion of the Proposed Project with full construction of the original Nature’s Refuge site (61 single family homes) assumed. The following access scenarios are considered: o Two Access Scenario - Access at the existing Main St/Glenwood Dr intersection and access at a proposed Andall St connection. o Single Access Scenario – Access only via the existing Main St/Glenwood Dr intersection. • Year 2040 to correspond with a planning year horizon. In year 2040 the Pine Oaks Addition development, adjacent to the east side of the Proposed Project, is assumed to be developed. Two additional access points are considered, a northern connection to Pine St through the future Pine Oaks Addition and a connection of Haywood Dr to Wood Duck Tr. Due to the feasibility concerns with the Andall St Access, access scenarios with and without the Andall St connection are considered. This study focuses on the roads and intersections that provide direct and indirect access to and from the site and details the existing and future roadway conditions at studied intersections and access points and includes traffic volumes, lane geometrics and traffic operational analysis results. The intersections reviewed included: • Main Street/Glenwood Drive • Main Street/Woodduck Trail • 4th Avenue/Andall Street • Andall St/Proposed Access The study results indicate there is little to no significant impact on the adjacent streets and intersections due to trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. Trip generation for the proposed development is estimated at 868 daily. Approximately 8% or 70 vehicles a day is expected to use the Andall Street connection. This is well within the capacity of Andall Street and Woodduck Trail based on the engineering review. Per City Code Section 1001.013(2)(c)4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the 15 subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. Based on the study Level of service requirements are met for both the 2027 and 2040 Build Scenarios with LOS maintained at C or better. Homeowners Association A homeowner’s association will be established and provide both association maintained yards and snow removal. Staff is also recommending that the open space be owned by the association with the City retaining a Conservation Easement over the property. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety The Police Division supports connection to Andall Street. The connection is important for public safety response to and from the development. The Fire Division also supports the Andall Street connection to improve response times to the entire area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the PUD and Preliminary Plat on March 26, 2025. Their comments are provided in the attached memo dated March 27, 2025. Park Board The Park Board reviewed the Preliminary Plat on April 2, 2025. The Board recommends cash fee in lieu of land dedication. The amount of cash dedication would be $329,000 ($3,500 per lot times 94 lots) minus the cost of trail construction. As discussed during concept plan review, the Park Board recommended designating the remaining cash dedication balances from Natures Refuge and Natures Refuge North to explore providing trails and leisure opportunities at Lino Lakes Elementary School. A collaborative arrangement with the Forest Lake School District to share resources could provide tremendous benefits for the students and general public. Planning and Zoning Board The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 14, 2025. The board debated various aspects of the development resulting in two failed motions. The board approved a 16 motion on a 5-1 vote to recommend approval with the conditions included in the staff recommendation, no flexibility from the garage requirements, and 24’ foot connection of the road for emergency access only. City Engineer The City Engineer provided comments in the attached memo. Developer responses received following the Planning and Zoning board have been included. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The need for a formal master plan was not identified for this area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the 2006 EAW concept plan for low density single family residential conservation development. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The applicant is proposing a conservation development. The villas provide a housing option with main-level living with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The conservation development preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics by minimizing wetland, woodland, and rare plant species impacts. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 17 The revised plan shifts the villas to the east and creates a 160-390 buffer along the west lot line near the existing Arena Acres neighborhood. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. The configuration of the lots preserves as many wetlands as possible and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally which results in a smaller network of utilities and streets. (f) Mix of land use types. There is no mix of land use types. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The villas provide a housing option with main-level living with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. • Planning District 2 identifies Woolan Park as a natural resource that should be protected. The proposed development strategically includes a stormwater pond/open space buffer near the Woolan Park wetland complex. This is a critical link to protecting this sensitive natural resource area. • A goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to provide service and capacity to developed areas of the city currently served by on-site systems. Municipal sanitary sewer and water also gets extended north which will eventually serve the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. • A goal of the Parks, Greenways & Trails Plan is to established greenway corridors. A multi-functional greenway corridor incorporating stormwater management, trails and open space is established with the development. Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Conservation development that protects and enhances the on-site natural resources such as wetlands, woodlands, rare plant species, and open space that are accessible to the general public. 18 2. Main-level living villa homes with association-maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life-cycle housing. 3. Preserved wetlands and established wetland buffers/conservation easements 4. Orderly transition from existing large lot single family Arena Acres neighborhood to smaller single family detached lots. 5. Efficient use of land resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets 6. Protection of Woolan Park wetland complex. 7. Extension of sanitary sewer to eventually serve Olive and Orange Street neighborhood currently served by on-site systems. 8. Establish multi-functional greenway corridor and trail system that is accessible to the public. 9. Parkland payment in lieu of dedication fees will be collected in addition to the open space set aside under conservation easement or City ownership. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval with the following conditions (items with strike through have been addressed by the applicant with 4/25/25 submittal): 1. Flexibility be provided to allow the garage to protrude 5’ in front of the house without the front porch requirement provided no such floor plans shall be allowed on adjacent lots. 2. Flexibility be provided to change the maximum length of the garage wall facing the street from 50% of the front facade width to a maximum of 57% subject to the following: (a) Decorative garage doors with a strip of windows are required. (b) Garage width in excess of two stalls will be recessed two feet from the main garage façade. (c) Total garage width will not exceed 32 feet. 3. That Street B connect to Andall Street with a minimum width of 24’. 4. Proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. Wetland buffers shall be provided around wetlands as required by RCWD. 5. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. 6. A temporary turn around will be required at the north end of Street A. 7. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D 8. The trail corridor between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 and east of Lots 1-4 Block 4 shall be widened to 30 feet wide. 9. The portion of Outlot D that is occupied by the lift station should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. 10. Cash fee in lieu of land dedication in the amount of $329,000 minus the cost of trail construction. 19 11. Compliance with the City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 12. Compliance with the Environmental Memo dated March 27, 2025 13. A stormwater reuse irrigation system is required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. XX-25 (to follow) 2. Resolution No. 25-XX (to follow) 3. Narrative prepared by M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul dated April 22, 2025 4. Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated April 25, 2025 5. Land Use Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 6. Phasing Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 7. Ghost Plat unnamed and undated 8. Response Comment to City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 9. Response Comments to Environmental Memo dated March 26, 2025 10. April 25, 2025 Response Comments to April 14,2025 P&Z staff report recommendations. 20 Attachment 1 Ordinance No. XX-25 TO BE INSERTED 21 Attachment 2 Resolution No. 25-XX TO BE INSERTED NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 1 INTRODUCTION M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (M/I Homes) is submitting an application for a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for land north of Natures Refuge. The proposed plan includes 93 villa homes on an approximately 59.30-acre site. The original concept plan for this development was reviewed at by the City in late 2023, and a neighborhood meeting was held in February 2024. With feedback received from both city staff and officials as well as the neighborhood meeting, M/I Homes presented a revised concept plan, consistent with the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD plan. This revised concept plan was reviewed by the Environmental Board, Planning Commission and City Council in late 2024. That revised concept plan and this proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD Plan accomplish the following: • Approximately 8.5 acres of open space adjacent to the Arena Acres neighborhood. o We revised the original concept plan to pull back lots from Arena Acres to the center of the development, increasing the buffer width from Arena Acres from 50 feet to 160-400 feet, and reduced the number of lots from 108 to 93 homes. • Approximately 34 acres of open space (58% of the site) and preserves natural features. o We provided 4 more acres of open space from the original concept plan. Providing this additional open space reduced the number of trees removed by 1,400. The site plan also takes care to avoid as many wetland impacts as possible. • A neighborhood plan and homes designed for empty nesters and seniors looking for single level living with association maintenance. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT We are requesting a PUD for this development to introduce a villa home option to the Natures Refuge neighborhood. Villa homes offer single level living and provide a low maintenance living option for older adults. Natures Refuge, to the south of this proposed neighborhood, has 80-foot-wide lots with traditional single-family homes. This neighborhood is proposed to introduce all 60-foot-wide villa lots with main-level living with association-maintained yards and snow removal. The City of Lino Lakes allows for development through a PUD if it results in public benefit as outlined in the City’s PUD ordinance. Nature Refuge North provides the following public benefits: • Addressing growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. o The single level living provided by villa homes include association-maintained yards and snow removal and therefore are popular with our senior buyers who are looking for a low maintenance home. It is not financially feasible to offer association-maintained yards and snow removal in the current neighborhood given the size of the lots. o The configuration of the lots works to preserve as many wetlands and trees as possible, and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally. • Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. As mentioned, the site design preserves over half the acreage in open space, which preserves as many wetlands and trees as possible. • Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. o The development abuts rural lots, and smaller lots allow a significant buffer from the rural lots while continuing to meet density requirements. • Provision of a housing type that is desirable to the city. Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 2 o The villa target buyers are older adults who value low maintenance living. It is not viable for an association to maintain a larger lot. • Other public benefits and values as recognized in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. o The proposed development will provide a lift station that is able to serve homes in the Stage 1B Planned Service Area as outlined in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. We believe the general requirements for a PUD are met in the following ways: • Public or common open space to meet minimum requirements established in the ordinance. The site provides approximately 34 acres of open space. • If PUD includes preservation of natural habitat, those habitats shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement. We have preserved approximately 58% open space within the site in order to preserve natural habitat. We are proposing to deed these outlots to the City as permanent open space to be preserved in perpetuity as public park. If the City elects not to accept the land as parkland, the HOA will own the land. Deed restrictions or restrictive covenants will preserve the land as open space. • Homeowners Association Required. The lots will be governed by a homeowner’s association (HOA) as further explained below. • Recreational open space or trail corridors intended as public parks or public trails shall be dedicated to the city or granted through an easement. o We intend to grant an easement over the public trails once built as was done in Natures Refuge. We will either dedicate the open space to the city or place deed restrictions over the lots. SITE PLAN There are four proposed street connections. One connecting from the south from Natures Refuge via Haywood Drive and connecting to future development to the north, one to the west to Arena Acres, and one to the east for future development. If the City desires, M/I Homes would be open to options to provide connections to Andall Street. The proposed development has a total of 93 60-foot-wide villa lots. The following table compares the proposed standards to the Two Family Residential (R-2) zoning district. The site is currently zoned Rural Executive (R-X). Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Villa Lots Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet 7,500 square feet (Average lot size is 9,266 square feet) Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125 feet Minimum Front Setback 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Side Setback 10 feet (5 feet for Attached Garage) 7.5 feet** Minimum Corner Side Setback 25 feet 20 feet Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet Impervious Surface 65% 65% Collector Road Right-of-Way Width 80 feet 60 feet* Garage Size Minimum 20 feet in width and 520 square feet in size We agree to adhere to these requirements. Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 3 Garage Design Garage shall not protrude forward of the front wall of the house, unless the house includes a front porch that is unenclosed, a minimum of six (6) feet in depth, and extends across 100 percent of the front façade of the house. The garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch. We are requesting this be waived but agree that the garage cannot protrude more than five feet forward the house (further explanation in the paragraph below). Garage Design The length of the garage wall facing the street shall not be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front façade of the structure for street-facing garage doors Garage walls shall not be greater than 58 percent of the length of the entire front façade (further explanation in the paragraph below). *This flexibility was granted for Natures Refuge. Haywood Drive from Natures Refuge was granted this flexibility, and the proposed development will extend Haywood Drive to the north. This flexibility is being requested for both Haywood Drive and Street A. **We will provide at least 15 feet between homes. The City currently allows a five-foot setback for garages and ten feet for homes, so this is generally consistent with R-2 zoning. GARAGE DESIGN STANDARDS In order to minimize impacts to trees, wetlands, and wildlife, we are proposing lot sizes consistent with the R-2 zoning standard with a lot width of 60 feet. R-2 zoning has different garage design requirements than the R- 1 zoning district and does not allow the length of the garage to be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front façade unless the second floor living space extends over the two-car portion of the garage; the garage doors are decorative and have a strip of windows; garages in excess of two stalls are broken up so the additional stalls are recessed two feet from the main garage stall; and garage width does not exceed 32 feet. We are proposing to be allowed garages that are up to 58 percent of the length of the entire façade. We agree to provide decorative garages with a strip of windows; not exceed two stalls or 32 feet in width; and to recess the garage doors two feet from the front of the garage. Some of our plans have living space above the garage, and we will provide a window above the garage where there is faux living space. This is further explained in the illustrations below. Because villas provide single-level living, we cannot provide the living space above the garage on all plans; we only have a few villa plans that are one and a half stories. We are also requesting that we be allowed some flexibility for some of our plans to have garages that protrude no more than five feet forward the house façade. The reason for these requests in flexibility is we cannot get to the 520 square foot garage size with meeting the design standards that are currently in place with single level living homes. In order to meet these requirements, we would need to make the house wider, and we cannot do that with the smaller lots we are proposing in order to conserve as much open space as possible. Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 4 Plans with Living Space Above Garage Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 5 Windows in Faux Living Space Above Garage Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 6 DENSITY The total site area is 59.30 acres with 5.62 acres of wetlands and 5.18 acres of wetland buffers. The planned density for this area is 1.6-3 units per acre. Netting out wetlands and wetland buffers, we are proposing a density of 1.98 units per acre, well below the maximum-allowed density. PUD flexibility and the R-2 zoning lot standards are necessary to meet the minimum density allowed in the City’s Comprehensive Plan and to minimize tree removal. It is not possible to meet the minimum density with 80-foot lots given the wetlands and their required buffers, as well as the gas line easement. With this site plan, 80-foot lots would yield 69 lots as shown in the Yield Plan Density Exhibit, which would result in a density of 1.41 units per acre, which is well below the minimum density planned for this area. Furthermore, these larger lots would result in greater tree removal. TREE PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE As mentioned above, we have designed our neighborhood plan to conserve as many trees as possible. Of the 6,494 trees on the site, we are saving 3,060 trees: almost 50%. We are proposing to preserve these trees in permanent open space to be dedicated to the City for public park, or as open space to be owned by the HOA. Given the extensive dedication of open space/park for permanent tree preservation, we are requesting that the City accept the land dedication and tree preservations areas or allow the space to be owned by the HOA and protected by a conservation easement and left natural in lieu of paying tree restitution. As part of this request, M/I Homes will agree to plant three trees per home for a total tree replacement of 279 trees. The Environmental Board, Planning Commission, and Council agreed during the revised concept plan review that this flexibility should be granted. We are proposing this for a number of reasons. First, the proposed plan preserves a little over 58% open space, conserving as many trees as possible. This is a heavily wooded site that is guided for a density of 1.6- 3 units per acre, and we are proposing a very low density, almost near the lowest density allowed. Additionally, almost 50% of the trees on site are Quaking Aspen, which do not survive long due to Cankers, which will kill the trees in 3-8 years. Finally, we have received extensive feedback from the residents of Arena Acres regarding the preservation of trees on this land. The dedication of public land would allow them to enjoy this land and the trees that are being preserved. If the City chooses not to accept the land dedication, an alternative option would be to place a deed restriction on the open space area prohibiting the removal of trees, and the land would be left in its natural state. The HOA would own the open space property. ELEVATIONS Example elevations of our villa product have been provided. These are just an example of the many elevations we offer. We also have anti-monotony requirements to ensure that very similar elevations are not adjacent to one another within the community to preserve visual interest. TIMING We plan to begin grading the site in late spring/early summer after approval of preliminary plat and other applicable agency approvals. We understand a grading-only development agreement will be required in order to accomplish this and therefore request that this agreement be reviewed concurrently with this Preliminary Plat and PUD application. Installation of utilities will occur when final plat has been approved and all conditions of final plat approval have been met. A phasing plan has been provided and is in draft form. The phasing plan will ensure that the lift station is up and running with the first phase of the development. Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 7 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS The development will have an HOA that will provide for the maintenance of the overall common elements in the community, including landscaping of the common areas as applicable and management of the natural resources. The HOA will also provide lawn care and snow removal for villa lots. Additionally, restrictions will be placed on outdoor storage and parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) in order to keep the community looking orderly and well maintained. Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 8 E XAMPLE ELEVATIONS – VILLAS The Willow The Cedarwood Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Page 9 Elmwood Aspen COVER 1 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R VICINITY MAP 35W Natures Refuge North Lino Lakes, Minnesota ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_cover.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 N A T U R E S R E F U G E A R E N A A C R E S OWNER:OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OWNER : OWNER: OWNER :OWNER : OWNER: OWNER : OWNER : OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : HA Y W O O D D R I V E ANDALL STREET OW N E R : OW N E R : f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_xcon.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 2 LEGEND bjs 3/4/2025 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:3/4/2025 40361 D R A F T EXISTING CONDITIONS OWNER:OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OWNER : OWNER: OWNER :OWNER : OWNER: OWNER : OWNER : OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : HA Y W O O D D R I V E ANDALL STREET OW N E R : ST R E E T C H A Y W O O D STREET D ST R E E T B STREET A DRIVE f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat index.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 3 LEGEND NJS 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:40361 SITE DATA SEE SH E E T 7 SETBACK DATA SEE SH E E T 5 SEE SH E E T 4 SEE SH E E T 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX3/4/2025 3/4/2025 OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : OWNER: ST R E E T C HAY W O O D DRIVE f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 4NJS 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:40361 3/4/2025 3/4/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT OWNER: OWNER:OWNER:OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OWNER: S T R E E T C STREET D S T R E E T C f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 5NJS 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:40361 PRELIMINARY PLAT3/4/2025 3/4/2025 OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OWNER: OWNER: OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : S T R E E T C ST R E E T B STREET A f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 6NJS 3/4/2025 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:40361 PRELIMINARY PLAT 3/4/2025 OW N E R : OW N E R : OW N E R : OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER:OWNER:OWNER: ST R E E T C STREET D STREET A S T R E E T C f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 of DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: FILE NO: Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments 15 7NJS 957 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date:License #:40361 PRELIMINARY PLAT3/4/2025 3/4/2025 SITE PLAN LEGEND ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_site.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 8 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15GRADING INDEX 9 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 10 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 12 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 13 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_details.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15DETAILS14 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_details.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15DETAILS15 FRAME CURB FRA M E ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_resource inventory exhibit.dwgSave Date:03/03/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 152 R1RESOURCE INVENTORY A R E N A A C R E S ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_resource inventory exhibit.dwgSave Date:03/03/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 152 R2RESOURCE INVENTORY WITH AERIAL IMAGERY N A T U R E S R E F U G E TREE PRESERVATION INDEX T5ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan - new tree rules.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota M/I HOMES 5354 Parkdale Drive St. Louis Park, MN 55416 I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 56346 JJO 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA RJR T1 BENCHMARK Know what's below.before you dig.Call R VICINITY MAP 35W TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T5ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan - new tree rules.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota M/I HOMES 5354 Parkdale Drive St. Louis Park, MN 55416 I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 56346 JJO 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA RJR T2 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T5ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan - new tree rules.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota M/I HOMES 5354 Parkdale Drive St. Louis Park, MN 55416 I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 56346 JJO 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA RJR T3 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T5ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan - new tree rules.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota M/I HOMES 5354 Parkdale Drive St. Louis Park, MN 55416 I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 56346 JJO 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA RJR T4 T5ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412.03_tree_mitigation - new tree rules.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota M/I HOMES 5354 Parkdale Drive St. Louis Park, MN 55416 I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 56346 JJO 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA RJR TREE MITIGATION BENCHMARK T5 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 04/25/25 - Per City CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 RJR 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 RJR #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 2 PP 1 OB 2 JL 4 RM 6 BB 8 HB 1 OB 3 CA 3 FM 3 OB 4 SB2 JL5 RM 3 WP 2 RB 3 KC 2 BF 2 BH 2 BF 3 KC 4 WP 3 FM 1 PP 5 WO 3 CA 2 PP 1 HO 5 BH 4 JL 3 RM 4 SB 5 WO 3 WP 3 HT 7 HL 2 OB 4 CA 4 JL 4 FM 5 BL 5 BB 4 RM 4 AE 3 SB 4 JL 3 CA 4 FM 10 AE 6 HT 5 JL 11 BL 2 OB 4 BB 4 SB 2 CA 2 FM 1 WP 1 HO 2 RB 4 BF 4 WO 4 WP 4 KC 2 BF 4 KC 2 RB 3 PP 1 HO 6 BF 6 BH 2 WO 6 RB 3 PP 1 HO 2 WO 2 HO 1 HO 1 HO 10 WO 1 WO ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 04/25/25 - Per City CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 RJR 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 RJR #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L2 1 WP 2 HL 2 PP 2 CA 2 FM 3 SB 8 WO 4 HT 1 OB 2 JL 4 RM 6 BB 8 HB 1 OB 3 CA 3 FM 3 OB 4 SB 2 JL5 RM 3 WP 2 RB 3 KC 2 BF 2 BH 1 WP 3 HL 2 BF 3 KC 4 WP 2 HL 2 BH 4 JL 3 RM 4 SB 5 WO 3 WP 3 HT 7 HL 2 OB 4 CA 4 JL 4 FM 5 BL 5 BB 4 RM 4 AE 3 SB 4 JL 3 CA 4 FM 10 AE 6 HT 5 JL 1 HO 2 RB 4 WP 4 KC 2 BF 1 HO 6 BF 6 BH 2 WO 1 HO 2 WO 1 WO PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L3 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 04/25/25 - Per City CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 RJR 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 RJR #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 EXISTING GRADE GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.) MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL 4"-6" SHREDDED BARK MULCH UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SUBSOIL NOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP) DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-7" ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MnDOT 3401) @ 180° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LINES AND STAKES 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BACKFILL SOIL. 7. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. 8. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 1. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING PLAN TREE WRAP BACKFILL MIX PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE 8" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS 8' STEEL TEE POST- 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 12" 6" 2' ( M I N . ) 6" 6"3 REQUIRED AT 120 SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER TREES RM 16 Acer rubrum `Northwood`Northwood Red Maple 2" Cal. B&B FM 18 Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 2" Cal. B&B RB 12 Betula nigra Clump Form, 2" Cal Equivalent River Birch Multi-Trunk 8` Ht.B&B HB 8 Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 2" Cal. B&B HL 14 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve`Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 2" Cal. B&B KC 14 Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Cal.B&B WO 37 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" Cal.B&B HO 8 Quercus x macdanielii `Clemons` TM Heritage Oak 2" Cal.B&B BL 16 Tilia americana `Boulevard`Boulevard Linden 2" Cal.B&B AE 14 Ulmus americana `Princeton`American Elm 2" Cal.B&B CONIFEROUS TREES BF 16 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6` Ht.B&B BH 15 Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6` Ht.B&B PP 11 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine 6` Ht.B&B WP 17 Pinus strobus White Pine 6` Ht.B&B ORNAMENTAL TREES OB 9 Aesculus glabra 'JN Select' TM Early Glow Ohio Buckeye 1.5" Cal.B&B SB 18 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` Clump Form, 1.5" Cal Equivalent Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7` Ht.B&B BB 15 Carpinus caroliniana Native Blue Beech 1.5" Cal.B&B HT 13 Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis`Thornless Hawthorn 1.5" Cal. B&B CA 17 Malus x `Prairifire` Red Flowers Prairifire Crabapple 1.5" Cal. B&B JL 21 Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` White Flowers Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal. B&B GROUND COVERS SOD 88,633 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod TI 79,793 sf Type I - Turf Seed Mix Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods Seeding Rate 160 lb/ac MnDOT Southern Boulevard (SB)seed TII 105,301 sf Type II - Native Seed Mix (Buffer) Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods Seeding Rate 39 lb/ac MnDOT Southern Tallgrass Roadside (STR)seed TIII 103,774 sf Type III - Stormwater Seed Mix Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods Seeding Rate 30 lb/ac MnDOT Wet Ditch (WD)seed PLANT SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L4 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 04/25/25 - Per City CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 RJR 3/4/25 Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 RJR #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4 ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_floodplain exhibit.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 151FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT F1 Know what's below.before you dig.Call R · · ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_wetland buffer ex.dwgSave Date:04/25/25 Revisions:1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed CommentsPrint Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 151 W1WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT LAND USE PLAN Natures Refuge North Lino Lakes, Minnesota ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\exhibits\5412-03_land use.dwgSave Date:03/13/25 Revisions:1.Print Name: Signature: Date:License #: Drawn: Designed: Date: I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 KRO 3/4/25 Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. 25063 BJK #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 N A T U R E S R E F U G E A R E N A A C R E S 1 1 ADB 3/4/25 LEGEND SITE DATA SOIL BORINGS WETLANDS VICINITY MAP 35W OWNER CONTACT Attachment 3. Land Use Plan 2 34567 8 9 10 111213 14 15161719 20 21 22 232425 26272829 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 81 80 79 1 37 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 626160 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 78 18 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT D 58 59 STR E E T A POND STREET B STREET A ANDALL STREET POND HAYWOO D D R I V E H A Y W O O D DR I V E OU T L O T POND LIFT STATIONPROPOSED TRAIL PROPOSED TRAIL PHASE I PHASE I PHASE II ST R E E T C (F U T U R E ) ofof f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\exhibits\5412.03 phasing exhibit.dwgSave Date:03/04/25 Revisions:1.Drawn: Designed: Date: #5412-03 M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15PHASING PLAN 1 13/4/25 JJO Attachment 4. Phasing Plan Attachment 5. Ghost Plat Memorandum To: Eric Zweber, WSB Cc: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 4, 2025 Re: Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat - Engineering Review 023898-000 WSB’s review of the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Natures Refuge North development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Carlson McCain and received March 10 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat Submittal prepared by Carlson McCain, dated March 4, 2025. • Natures Refuge North Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated March 4, 2025. • Natures Refuge North Traffic Impact Study prepared by S2 Traffic Solutions, dated March 28, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Responses Carlson Engineering 4/25/2025 Engineering • General The Natures Refuge North Addition is the second phase of the overall Natures Refuge development which includes 60 acres north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of CSAH 23 (Lake Street) and east of Wood Duck Trail. The project proposes 92 villa lots and associated infrastructure. This property was originally part of a larger development of which an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared. The evaluation concluded that the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects. • Grading The Natures Refuge North Addition includes site grading for the 92 units as well as extensions of Haywood Drive and three local streets that are yet to be named. Comments: 1. Show EOF elevations , locations, and routes for all low points in the paved and green spaces. EOF’s have been added to all low points and ponds. a. EOF elevations must meet minimum freeboard requirements with building lowest opening elevations (LOEs) EOF’s elevation have been verified to meet freeboard requirements. 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | S U I T E 2 0 0 | S A I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | W S B E N G . C O M Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 2 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Natures Refuge North Addition consists of storm sewer draining streets and yards, two sedimentation basins, and a large basin excavated for fill material. The stormwater systems shall meet the City’s and Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) Stormwater Management requirements. All proposed future public streets must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 0.27 1.25 9.48 Needed if basins landlocked Proposed 0.68 2.85 12.81 Needed if basins landlocked Comments: 1. Outflow rates increase for all modeled storm events beyond what can be attributed to model accuracy. Further attempts at providing rate control must be made. For example, ditching flows from back yards to the inlets routing to BMPs, lowering the FES north of Wetland 50 to better route flows into Pond 500, or small rate-control basins at areas that cannot reasonably be routed into a BMP. a. If increases cannot be avoided, it must be demonstrated that they will not cause an adverse downstream impact. Flows have been adjusted and plans modified. 2. The SWMP water quality calculations show 0.90 acres of existing impervious, however the HydroCAD existing modeling has 3.57 acres of unconnected roof land cover. Please clarify these differences. Existing impervious adjusted within water quality calculations. 3. Please revise the Water Quality calculations in the SWMP as they do not match HydroCAD modeling. For instance, HydroCAD modeling shows 16.86 total acres and 7.52 acres of impervious routed to Pond 600, but the SWMP has a total area of 9.77 acres and 0.196 acres of impervious. Water quality calculation updated. 4. NURP criteria specify a maximum depth of 10’. Pond 500 has a depth of 11’, raising the bottom elevation to 10’ will bring it into NURP compliance and still keep the majority of its dead volume. Pond 500 has been revised to a depth of 10’ 5. Per new RCWD standards, any new impervious flowing to a pond designed in accordance with NURP criteria counts as full water quality treatment, therefore the full volume credit can be claimed for new impervious flowing to Pond 500 and 600 if properly designed. Water quality revised. 6. Pond 300 should be renamed to Lake 300 as its depth is well in excess of the 10’ max depth outlined in NURP criteria. Additionally, it cannot be counted as providing water quality treatment. Note has been revised. 7. Please clarify why drainage area 26S is modeled. It is offsite and has no change from existing to proposed conditions. 26S was modeled assuming the Street B connection to Andall may occur. We are assuming the new street will have ribbon curb and there will be no drainage increase to 26 (for now) 8. The 2.5” event should be modeled in HydroCAD to determine runoff volumes needed for pond dead storage. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 3 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review The 2.5” event is calculated within our pond spreadsheet which gives us our required dead storage through calculations within this spreadsheet. 9. As many wetlands receiving runoff are Type 1, they are classified as highly susceptible and therefore must have no increase in bounce or inundation period for the 2- and 10-year events. Kjolhaug environmental reviewed the wetland susceptibility and all wetlands were adjusted. No wetlands are considered highly susceptible. 10. Detailed storm sewer plans, profiles, and calculations will be needed in future submittals. This should include all utility crossings to confirm constructability and any need for insulation. It should also include structure type and sizing to confirm constructability with pipe alignments. It is likely that more storm sewer design comments will be generated at that time. The plan and profiles will be provided with final plans. Design spreadsheet and structure map provided until final plans are made. a. The pipe run from FES to 503 as shown has a velocity under the minimum of 3 ft/s. FES removed as it does not provide a benefit. No surface water can be directed towards pond 500 in this location. 11. All proposed storm sewer serving public roads must be a minimum 15” diameter and consist of RCP. Noted. 12. Inlet spread and run calculations, especially at sag points, will be needed to confirm public roads are designed in accordance with City standards of maintaining an 8’ drivable lane during the 3-year storm event. Spread calcs added – based on 3-year event. 13. Erosion control blankets must be shown on slopes 4:1 and steeper, such as around proposed basins. Erosion control blanket added where necessary. • Water Supply The development will include a water system with 8 to 16 inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot. Comments: 1. Connect to existing 16" DIP Watermain Note added 2. Identify on all plans coordinating with utility (gas) provider for utility installation, grading, and street construction Note added. 3. Verify potential conflicts at all utility crossings a. Maintain minimum 18" separation from watermain/services Watermain will be adjusted (lowered) as needed to maintain separation from service crossings. This will be determined with final plans. b. Insulate when separation between storm sewer and watermain or forcemain is less than 36" Noted. To be shown on final plans. 4. Provide barricades to protect the temporary hydrant at the ends of Street A and Street C Barricades added and called out on site plan. 5. Add a gate valve to the western leg of the Street C/D tee Valve added 6. Extend watermain and hydrant with Street B to Andall Street with this development Street added and grading as been adjusted. • Sanitary Sewer Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 4 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review The site will be served by 8- inch diameter main along with 4-inch Schedule 40 PVC service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the north, and east. A lift station is proposed to serve the development and future sewer districts to the east in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Comments: 1. Connect to existing 10" PVC SDR 35 sanitary sewer main a. Match existing slope Note added. Existing invert and slope based on proposed stub elevation from Natures Refuge. 2. [Lift Station] a. The lift station can be raised by 2 feet. Per discussion, the lift station was raised 4-feet. b. Projected peak hourly flow from 228 residential units is about 120 gpm, so 8” sewers shown are sufficient. Noted. i. Forcemain will be 4”. Noted. c. Deep 35’ build at the lift station, but looks like it’s needed to serve the northeast corner by gravity. Noted. i. Looks like about 50’ radius around wet well for excavation during construction, hopefully enough unless Geotech requires shallower embankment. Noted. Assuming sandy soils – 1:1 minimum will be needed. Easement does cover a 50’ radius from the center of lift station. Future maintenance should be covered. Sheet piling or trench box should cover any embankment issues along the street side if for some reason the lift station needed to be repaired. d. Can the 12’ build at the northwest corner serve the street extending north outside the service area if desired? No. Currently it does not. Please advise if this sanitary line needs to service the area to the north. 3. Insulate all sewer with less than 7' cover a. Consider lowering the watermain to limit conflicts between services and mains Watermain will be lowered as-needed for service conflicts – this will be shown with final plans. • Transportation The proposed development will have a primary access from Haywood and Glenwood Drives. Which is the shortest route out the proposed neighborhood. The City also requires a connection to Andall St. to the existing Arena Acers Development. The City has an existing right of way to provide access to the easterly property. Per the traffic study the connection to Andall St will receive minimal traffic, however it will provide connectivity for public safety and the neighborhoods it serves. This connection is in conformance with the City’s Ordinances for adjoining adjacent subdivision for reasonable circulation of traffic. The City of Lino Lakes’ Comprehensive Plan requires neighborhood street connections for reduced travel times and linking neighborhoods together. The City’s Engineering and Public Safety departments submit that the roadway connection to Andall Street shall be constructed as detailed below. Trails and sidewalks Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 5 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review A trail is proposed extending from the south end of the development at the connection with Natures Refuge, to the north end of the development and branching west to one of the new streets. Reference the City Planner’s report for trail and sidewalk detail. Comments: 1. There is little to no significant impact on the adjacent streets and intersections due to the trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. Noted. 2. There is no difference in operations with or without the Andall Street access. The benefits of connecting the development to Andall Street are: a) Improving Fire and Life Safety response to both neighborhoods (providing additional means of access). b) Connectivity of neighborhoods which generally results in a reduction of overall vehicle miles traveled. c) Provides access for the existing neighborhood to sidewalks and trail system. Also, can provide a safer route to/from the school with almost no need to walk/bike on CSAH 14. Noted. Street added. 3. It may be beneficial to look into providing a trail extension from the school to Basswood to provide a non-motorized connection to the school completely independent from CSAH 14. Noted. 4. The CSAH 14/Wood Duck intersection is expected to operate acceptably during full- build scenarios. In the future the City should consider working with Anoka County to providing exclusive left-turn lanes on CSAH 14. Noted. 5. Andall Street should be constructed as a 24 foot wide roadway within the cleared path from the watermain / fire hydrant extension to the Arena Acres Development. The City will consider a sidewalk on one side of the roadway during the final plat review. It is anticipated that approximately 15 trees will be removed with the construction of the watermain and roadway. There will also be wetland impacts that will need to be mitigated. Street has been adjusted. 6. Provide a striped crosswalk at the east end of Street C instead of having the trail cross the road Trail adjusted. Markings to be provided with final plans a. Provide pedestrian crossing and advanced pedestrian crossing signs Pedestrian crossing will be shown with final plans. b. Provide pedestrian ramps Trail adjusted in order for pedestrian ramps to be installed c. Realign trail to cross Street C at a perpendicular angle Revised. 7. Provide barricades to protect the temporary hydrant Barricades added and called out on site plan. 8. Provide a separate trail easement for the public trail crossing Outlot D This will be provided with final plans – once trail is built 9. Provide road profiles meeting 30 MPH horizontal and vertical design curves Speed limit reduction signs will be provided in lieu of meeting 30 MPH horizontal and Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 6 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review vertical curves. These will be provided with final plans. • Wetlands and Environment The project proposes approximately 1.62 acres of wetland impact. A wetland replacement plan will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through RCWD and the City. The current WCA NOD document states they are avoiding impacts to wetland 8 however, wetland 8 will be impacted with the connection to Andall Street and should be included with the impacts. Review of the MnDNR’s Natural Heritage Information System database indicates the potential presence of several protected species within and near the project area, including protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for additional studies or surveys. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. Any disturbed buffer areas should be seeded with a seed mix containing native, non-invasive, species. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Natures Refuge North Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The Natures Refuge North Addition does not impact the existing floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features. Comments: 1. More detailed storm sewer plans must be submitted to sufficiently review required drainage and utility easements over pipes. a. This could potentially impact lot widths of existing parcels Design spreadsheet provided – storm depths verified easements verified. 2. Provide a separate trail easement for the public trail crossing Outlot D Trail easement will be provided after trail is constructed. • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 7 Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Natures Refuge North Addition will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Borrow areas / Lakes area will be maintained by the HOA. • Permits Required Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit To be acquired prior to grading – will be acquired with final plans 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction To be acquired with final plans 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be acquired with final plans 4. Minnesota Department of Health To be acquired with final plans 5. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit To be acquired prior to grading 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit 7. To be acquired prior to grading If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Page 1 Environmental Memo Attachment7.EnvironmentalMemo To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments – Natures Refuge North PPP PP 04/25/25 – Carlson Engineering Responses Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1. Coordinate with the Rare Plant Rescue group (contact Carrie Taylor at Anoka Conservation District) to allow for transport of any rare plants for which impact is unavoidable to a donor site, such as Wollan’s Park Wetland Bank in Lino Lakes. Noted, this will be coordinated with developer. 2. Show minimal plantings of oaks along the two stormwater ponds. These areas are to remain largely unplanted to encourage native plant species. A few oaks should be scattered around the basin to provide soil stabilization and screening. Revised landscape plan includes additional open space trees. 3. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse. Re-use system incorporated into site. b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA Additional groundwater information provided. Page 2 c. Stormwater Pond 500 and 600 are shown to be collecting drainage from wetland overflows. Verify basins are sized to handle additional runoff Basins are modeled to include the drainage from wetlands. Note that the wetlands are modeled with both a flow into the pond as well as any existing overland flows. i. Credit is not given for drainage from the wetlands that is directed to the stormwater ponds Noted. 4. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27 Tree protection fence is not necessary as all areas outside of the grading limits will be protected by silt fence. 5. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. Noted. See comment above regarding silt fence. 6. Ash trees preserved will not provide any existing tree credit. All ash trees should be removed unless noted they are and will continue to be treated for EAB on two-year rotations Noted. All ash trees will be removed. 7. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site-specific mixes for each location. Currently showing wet ditch planting for stormwater areas and tall grass roadside mix for buffer locations. Seed mixes are consistent with approved WMC Seeding and Maintenance Plan for Natures Refuge (south), and 2024 MnDOT Seeding Manual. Note as of 2024 MnDOT seed mixes are no longer numbered and have been updated / replaced with new mix designs designated by letter. 8. Low maintenance turf should be evaluated through out the development. Ground covers should be drought resistant to reduce the need for irrigation use. Noted. 9. Add a note to the landscape plan to stockpile topsoil and preserve during the project. Topsoil should be spread over the open space and natural areas to promote the existing seed bank and encourage native plants. Noted, landscape specifications for Soil Preparation and Topsoil Material on sheet L4. Page 3 10. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. Noted, this will be provided. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 SWPPP provided b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals Noted. 11. Wetlands 30 and 35 are outside of the WMC buffer area. These wetlands appear to be outside of the area of disturbance. Staff recommends extending buffers around both wetlands as much as possible. Combining the buffer between the two wetlands would add the most protection and add additional wildlife benefits. Noted. 12. Confirm wetland outlets are above the HWL for the wetlands and will not affect hydrology during final design. Wetland bounce and inundation verified within the storm water management plan. 13. The Andall St connection should have the minimum width as derived from the traffic study and allowed by city ordinance to allow for emergency services and public street connection. Reduction of the road width will preserve wetlands and trees through the corridor. Noted. Street width adjusted to 24-feet back to back with ribbon curb. a. Trail connections should be provided along with water stubs for fire prevention. Sidewalk added 14. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations Noted. – to be coordinated with developer 15. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb is provided to allow turtles access off of the roads. Noted, turtle mitigation plan to be provided by developer. Surmountable curb installed where possible. 16. Submit the approved MN DNR Take Permit Noted, to be provided by Kjolhaug. Responses 04/25/2025 Carlson Engineering RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the Planning & Zoning Board: 1. Are there other Benefits Gained or Flexibility Provided? 2. Thoughts on requested PUD flexibility? a. If garage forward of house is acceptable, should there be a limit on how far? Additional Staff Comments: 1. Proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. Noted. This will be provided. 2. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. This lot is unbuildable until either parcel to the north develops, or a grading easement is provided. 3. A temporary turn around will be required at the north end of Street A. Turn around will be provided and shown on final plans. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D Sidewalk added to street B. Street D sidewalk to be verified – cul-de-sac 5. The trail corridor between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 and east of Lots 1-4 Block 4 shall be widened to 30 feet wide. Revised. 8. The portion Outlot D that is occupied by the lift station should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. Outlot added. 9. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands and greenway corridors. Easements and buffers will be provided per city & RCWD rules. 10. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30ft wide. Noted. A separate 30-foot easement will be provided. 11. Cash fee in lieu of land dedication in the amount of $329,000 minus the cost of trail construction. Noted. 12. Compliance with the City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 Responses to city engineer comments attached. 13. Compliance with the Environmental Memo dated March 27, 2025 Responses to environmental comments attached. 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Wilkinson Waters ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The applicant, Wilkinson Waters LLC, is proposing a master planned development located on North Oaks Company Inc. property south of County Road J/Ash Street/CSAH 32, west of Centerville Road/CSAH 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. The development contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 76 gross acres and consists of a mix of 340 unit residential housing types and commercial development. The proposed development is called Wilkinson Waters. Tentative Review Schedule: Complete Application Date: March 12, 2025 60-Day Deadline: May 11, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: March 26, 2025 Park Board Meeting: April 2, 2025 EDAC Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: April 9, 2025 and May 14, 2025 City Council Work Session: May 5, 2025 City Council Meeting: May 27, 2025 The Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires notice to affected jurisdictions. They have 60 days to review and comment. The 60 day deadline is May 17, 2025 so the City Council meeting date for consideration is May 27, 2025. The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025. Unfortunately, the notice was not mailed to all property owners within 600ft of the development boundary so a second hearing will be held on May 14th. 2 One concern brought up during the April 9th meeting was vehicle headlights entering or exiting the underground parking lot shining into adjacent houses along Ash St. A five (5) ft tall privacy fence is proposed to be installed along the drive lanes to screen the headlights. Staff recommends the fence be 6ft tall and another fence be installed along the east side to benefit the house at 6102 Centerville Road. This staff report provides edits to the April 9, 2025 Planning & Zoning staff report. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). BACKGROUND The Land Use Application is for the following: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning • PUD Preliminary Plan • Preliminary Plat • Site & Building Plan Review This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Maps prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Ash Street Traffic Impact Study prepared by ISG dated October 14, 2024 • Wetland Replacement Plan prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services dated March 2, 2025 • Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Plan prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Stormwater Management Report prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Traffic Noise Analysis prepared by ESI Engineering dated March 11, 2025 • Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec dated February 11, 2025 • Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines and Statement of Intent received on March 10, 2025 ANALYSIS History In September 2015, North Oaks Company LLC submitted a PUD Concept Plan for Advisory Board and Council review. The concept plan included two (2) parcels totaling 46 gross acres. It consisted of a residential mix of single family homes, twin homes, and senior housing rentals 3 totaling 136-161 housing units. The proposed development did not meet density requirements and did not move forward. In August 2024, the current developer submitted a PUD Concept Plan for advisory board and council input for a 356 housing unit and commercial development. The concept plan did not meet density requirements and the plans were revised to the current submittal. Current Proposal Please see the attached applicant’s Design Guidelines booklet for a detailed description of the project. Per the narrative, “The proposed land uses include 34,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) – three story 100 unit market rate multi-family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 40 townhome units, and one (1) – 100 unit senior living facility. In addition to these land uses there will be a regional stormwater management system that will be integrated into the natural landscape North of Wilkinson Lake.” Residential The following chart compares the August 2024 PUD Concept Plan with the proposed March 2025 PUD Preliminary Plan. The applicant is proposing the following mix and number of housing types: August 2024 Concept March 2025 PUD Plan Housing Type # Units # Units 4-plex Townhomes = 20 (5 buildings) 40 (10 buildings) 6-plex Townhomes = 36 (6 buildings) 0 Market Rate Multi-Family = (2 buildings x 100 units) 200 200 Senior Living Multi-Family = 100 100 356 340 The residential development transitions from townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and CSAH 32 (Ash Street) to the apartments adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road). The senior living building is also near Wilkinson Lakes. Trails, sidewalks and stormwater ponds are included throughout the development. 4 Commercial The applicant is proposing approximately 5 acres of commercial development in the southeast quadrant of the site adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) and Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. Sheet C3-10 Overall Site Plan shows three (3) commercial building pads (5,488-18,012sf footprint). Phasing The development is proposed to be built out in 4 phases: the 2 multiple family buildings, the townhome buildings, senior building, and commercial. See attached Phasing Plan. Existing Conditions The predominant existing land use is agricultural. MLCCS classifications include cattail marsh, saturated altered/non-native dominated vegetation, grasslands, deciduous trees and agriculture. Soil types include hydric, predominantly hydric, predominately non-hydric and non-hydric. Wetlands and floodplain exist on the west portion of the site. Several utility easements bisect the site. Current site grades range from about 904 to 929 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and generally slopes down to the west to the wetland area. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Low Density Residential South City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens Senior Living Community) East R-X, Rural Executive Rural Residential Permanent Rural West R, Rural Agriculture Medium Density Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5 The site contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 76 gross acres and has 3 land use designations: medium density, high density, and signature gateway. One parcel (PID# 34-31-22- 44-0008) will be re-guided from high density to signature gateway. See attached Existing Land Use Plan and Proposed Land Use Plan. Per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the areas are not intended to be strict land use and density boundaries but should be considered somewhat flexible to accommodate development. The Met Council requires a formal comprehensive plan amendment to adjust the land use boundaries. The proposed amendment slightly increases the allowed number of housing units; however, the proposed development of 340 units falls within both ranges. Existing Comp Plan Proposed Comp Plan Range of Allowed # of Housing Units 234 to 404 252 to 467 The Comprehensive Plan Amendment was mailed on March 18, 2025 to affected jurisdictions for their review and comment. The 60 day comment period ends May 17, 2025. At the April 9, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, Board Member Guthmueller asked what the definition of Signature Gateway is. Page 3-10 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan states: “Signature Gateway This Land Use Plan identifies 73 acres for Signature Gateway development, which accounts for 0.5% of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). The Signature Gateway District is reserved for high visibility, high traffic corridors serving as an entrance to the Community. The district allows residential at a density of 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre with 15 units per acre allowed if the project meets the City's housing goals. The district allows for development of multiple complementary uses on a single site including a combination of higher density residential, commercial services, and employment opportunities. This district incorporates planning parameters estimating the ratio of the residential and commercial mix. These ranges are flexible and may change based on a specific development proposal.” Planning District #4 further details this areas Signature Gateway Area. Planning District #4 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is located in Planning District 4. The Comprehensive Plan states: 6 Land Use • A gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning guide was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. Financing is now needed to implement the plan. • Planning District 4 includes one area designated Signature Gateway Area (Centerville Road/County Road J). o This site is located at the intersection of two county roads, near an I-35E interchange. The site is expected to develop as an extension of the multi-family and commercial development south of the municipal boundary in the City of North Oaks. Approximately 80 percent of the area is expected to accommodate residential development at 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre. The City Council may allow up to 15 units per acre for projects that meet specific city housing goals. It is important to note the 80/20 percent residential/commercial mix is related only to the 45 acres of land guided for Signature Gateway (based on the proposed Comp Plan Amendment). These 45 acres could support 9 acres of commercial development (45 acres x 20% = 9 acres.) The proposed Wilkinson Waters development includes 5 acres of commercial which is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Infrastructure & Public Facilities • Recommended sanitary sewer improvements in this area are based on connecting to the White Bear Township sewer in Centerville Road. Local sewers will discharge to at least two lift stations which will pump by force main to the White Bear Township facility. • The White Bear Township trunk sewer, constructed in the late 1980’s, has capacity to serve portions of North Oaks and Lino Lakes in addition to White Bear Township’s needs. North Oaks, by written agreement with White Bear Township, has purchased the right to use some of this capacity. The agreement has been modified, and North Oaks has made additional payments to the township as North Oaks’ service needs have increased. A review of the current utilization of this facility indicates that there is still capacity available to serve at least a portion of the projected development in District 4. However, no formal agreement exists between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township. It 7 is recommended that the city commence negotiations with White Bear Township to secure the right to discharge to this facility. Negotiations are in process to include both sanitary sewer and water supply. • Pursue a full interchange at I-35E and County Road J (Ash Street). Ramsey County is finalizing design for the I-35E and CR J (Ash St) Interchange with construction proposed for Summer of 2025. • Work with Anoka County and Ramsey County to ensure appropriate access management on County Road J (Ash Street). MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway and access management improvement plans and financing for the I-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. Anoka County is designing the Ash Street (CSAH 32) and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) improvements with construction proposed for Summer of 2026. Density For this development, density requirements are regulated by both the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and City Chapter 1102: Shoreland Management Overlay. Where the requirements are more or less restrictive, the more restrictive standards shall apply. In this case, it appears the 2040 Comprehensive Plan density requirements are more restrictive and shall be applied. • 2040 Comprehensive Plan See attached Land Use and Density Plan. The following chart is a summary of the site’s general housing unit range and density using Met Council’s density formula assuming approval of the comprehensive plan amendment: 8 The Signature Gateway district allows for up to 15 units per net acre if the project meets the City’s housing goals. These goals are provided in the attachments. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 194 to 363 housing units. The proposed 340 housing units is within the allowed the density range. • Shoreland Management Overlay Ordinance City Code Section 1102.13(4) details Shoreland PUD density requirements. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 262 to 452 housing units. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan density range is more restrictive and shall be applied. Growth Management Strategy PID #34-31-22-43-0006 PID #34-31-22-44-0001 PID#34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 Southwest Parcel Northwest Parcel Middle Parcel New Signature Gateway Parcel Total Gross Area (acres)15.21 15.13 0.00 45.55 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.21 12.06 0.00 9.41 36.68 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 3.07 0.00 0.81 3.88 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.12 4.12 Other (UPA Powerline Easement)0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 2.09 Other (Commercial)0.00 0.00 0.00 4.90 4.90 Net Area (acres)0.00 0.00 0.00 24.22 24.22 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 0 0 194 194 High 0 0 0 242 242 High + Signature Gateway -Max 15 0 0 0 363 363 Proposed # Housing Units 340 Gross Density (units/acre)4.48 Net Density (units/acre)14.04 Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Signature Gateway Signature Gateway Residential Use Net Area (acres) Net Area (sf) Lot Area Per Section 1102.13(4)(b) Range of Total # Housing Units Allowed Townhomes 24.23 1,055,459 5,000 211 Apartment 24.23 1,055,459 2,900 364 9 Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City’s Growth Management Strategy. The strategy works in conjunction with the City’s utility staging plan. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5-year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2024, the City’s average annual number of units is 123. This is less the allowed 230 unit annual allocation. With existing projects underway the project will be phased over multiple years to meet growth management requirements. Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Medium Density and Signature Gateway Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in having the property developed. The property will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Signature Gateway land use and allow for multi-family development in the shoreland district, zoning flexibility and create a mixed used development. Shoreland District The subject property is located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. They are both classified as Natural Environment lakes. Multi- family apartments are only allowed in the shoreland district by PUD. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. These are detailed below and throughout this staff report. Impervious Surface Coverage Maximum allowed townhome impervious coverage is 35% and commercial/multi-family is 60%. Per Sheet A0-12, Land Use & Density Plan, the total aggregate impervious coverage is 24.6%, which is less than the minimum 35% allowed. 10 Open space requirements At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. Per Sheet A0-12, Land Use & Density Plan, there are approximately 41 acres of public open space. This divided by the 76 acre total site equals 53% open space. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. The purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be departed from to accomplish public value purposes. The proposed conventional zoning districts used for this project are R-4, High Density Residential for the townhomes and apartments and GB, General Business for the commercial. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Residential Lot Size and Width The attached PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations Chart details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district and shoreland requirements. The chart also compares the proposed development to these guidelines. Overall, the senior living and apartments appear to meet minimum R-4, High Density lot size and width requirements as detailed on the chart. PUD flexibility is required for the townhome lot width and sizes. Setbacks The following chart compares the conventional R-4, High Density zoning ordinance and shoreland requirements to the proposed setbacks. 11 Multifamily Apartments City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW (Arterial St- Centerville Road) Building = 40 ft Parking Lot = 15 ft 40+ ft 15+ ft No Street ROW (Arterial St- Ash Street) Building = 40 ft Parking Lot = 15 ft 40+ ft 15+ ft No Rear Lot Line Building = 30 ft Parking Lot = 5 ft 30+ ft 5+ft No Side Lot Line Building = 20 ft Parking Lot = 5ft 15 ft 5 ft Yes Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 750 ft No PUD flexibility is required for multifamily side lot line building setbacks. Townhomes Townhomes City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW (Arterial St- Ash Street) Building = 40 ft 40 ft No Street ROW (Local St- Wilkinson Way) Building = 30 ft 30 ft No Rear Lot Line Building = 30 ft 15 fta 30 fta Yes No Side Lot Line Building = 20 ft 10 ft Yes Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 430ft No aThe rear lot line setbacks of the townhomes east of Wilkinson Way are 15ft. The rear lot line setbacks of the townhomes west of Wilkinson Way meet the required 30ft. PUD flexibility is required for townhome rear and side lot line building setbacks. Senior Living Senior Living City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? 12 Street ROW (Local St- Wilkinson way) Building = 30 ft Parking Lot = 15 ft 30+ ft 10 ft Yes Rear Lot Line Building = 30 ft Parking Lot = 5 ft 30+ ft NA No Side Lot Line Building = 20 ft Parking Lot = 5ft 20 ft NA No Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 440 ft No PUD flexibility is requested for senior living parking lot setbacks. Staff Comment: 1. Staff does not support this parking lot setback flexibility. Commercial City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district Development Standards. The development proposes to use the GB, General Business zoning district as guidelines. Per City Code Section 1007.132 GB, General Business, Commercial City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW (Arterial St- Centerville Road) Building = 40 ft Parking Lot = 15 ft 40 ft 40 ft No Street ROW (Local St- Wilkinson Way) Building = 30 ft Parking Lot = 15 ft 30 ft 15+ ft No Street ROW (Wilkinson Lake Blvd) Building = 30 ft Parking Lot = 10 ft 30+ ft 5+ft No Side Lot Line Building = 10 ft Parking Lot = 10ft 15 ft 10+ ft No Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 1,000 ft No PUD flexibility is not required for the commercial development. 13 Staff Comments: 1. The Site Plan in the Design Guidelines booklet shall clearly show the approved building and parking lot setbacks for the entire development. This will establish the baseline setbacks for all development. Yield Plan As required per City Code Section 1001.026(4), the applicant submitted the attached yield plan. The yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters. The submitted yield plan indicates 13 separate residential buildings with a total of 394 housing units and no commercial component. The proposed concept plan is 340 housing units. Site Plan Review This site plan review is applicable only to the two (2) multifamily buildings site. In general, performance standards are met. Site plan review for the commercial and senior living buildings will be completed in the future upon their construction. The multifamily lot contains two (2), 100 unit buildings, a clubhouse with amenities such as a swimming pool, walking paths, pavilions, pickleball courts, surface parking spaces, etc. Lot sizes and setbacks were discussed above. Refuse and recyclable material enclosures will be located inside the garage level. Outdoor lighting meets the photometric foot candle and pole height requirements. Parking spaces requirements are 2 rent-free spaces per unit. A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be within the building. The 200 units require 400 parking spaces. 191 surface parking spaces and 210 covered parking spaces are proposed for a total of 401 parking spaces. Ten spaces are ADA complaint. Parking space requirements are met. Building Design Requirements City Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential and commercial building design standard requirements. The R-4 residential zoning districts also provide addition requirements. 14 The Design Guideline booklet details architecture standards. The multi-family apartments, clubhouse, and townhomes use exterior materials of wood finish accents, stone, and stucco. The color palette is brown and tan. Exterior elevations and materials were not included for the future senior living building or commercial but we anticipate material color themes to extend throughout the development. The townhome units are 29ft wide with 600sf garage sizes. The booklet includes several renderings and data tables showing compliance with general building provisions and exterior material requirements. Staff Comments: 1. One multifamily dwelling requirement that is not met is, “Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective.” 2. Staff recommends the townhomes include a stone base around all elevations. Per the Design Guidelines booklet, the applicant is requesting building design PUD flexibility for: 1. At multi- family buildings, the applicant will request the flexibility to be the greater of 4 stories or 55’ from grade to mid-rake of slope roof or top of parapet of flat roof. City Code Section 1007.114(8) of the R-4 District allows for a maximum building height of the greater of 3 stories or 40ft. City Code Section 1102.07(2)(c) of the Shoreland District allows for a maximum building height of 36ft. Height is measured as the average height of the highest gable or a pitch or hipped roof. The multifamily apartments are 3 stories with a mid-rake or building height of 39ft. The senior living building is proposed 4 stories with a mid-rake or building height of 55ft. Staff Comments: 1. Staff has concerns regarding the proposed 4 stories, 55ft building height from grade to mid-rake. The concept plan proposed 4 stories with a mid-rake or building height of 48ft for the senior living building. 2. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code 1007.114 R-4(5). 15 City Code Section 1007.114(4) of the R-4 District requires the minimum livable floor area for each multiple-family dwelling unit shall be 700 square feet plus 100 additional square feet for each bedroom. During concept plan review, there was general support for the 15% of the units being studio apartments. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of residential and commercial lots and blocks. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Lot or Outlot Purpose Ownership Lots 1-5, Block 1 Townhomes Private Lots 1-5, Block 2 Townhomes Private Lot 6, Block 2 2 multifamily buildings Private A Open space, wetlands, buffer, lake HOA B Open space, wetland buffer, stormwater ponds HOA C Trail corridor HOA D Future senior living building Private E Future commercial Private Staff Comments: 1. An outlot shall be created for the upland area of the public park to the west that will be used for passive recreation. The outlot will be owned by the City. Streets and Alleys CSAH 32 (Ash Street) and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) are A-Minor Arterial Expander roads. Internal streets consist of local streets and private driveways intended to serve the site. Wilkinson Way is a local street with 60ft of right-of-way and paved 30ft back to back. Sidewalk is provided along the east side of Wilkson Way. 16 MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway improvement plans and financing for the I-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. These improvements are tentatively scheduled for 2025 and 2026. Road easements 33ft wide are being dedicated along Ash Street and Centerville Road. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided along all lot lines. Staff Comments: 1. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. 2. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands, ditches, and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The grading plans show four (4) rain gardens and one (1) stormwater management facility. A multi-purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space have been incorporated into the development. Per the WSB Engineering Memo dated April 2, 2025, stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 Needed if basins landlocked Currently Proposed 17.76 45.54 117.14 Needed if basins landlocked Utilities Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. 17 The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District (Sub-district 4A). Flows from this area will be conveyed to the southeast through the White Bear Township sanitary sewer system. The site is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). The two (2) easterly lots containing the residential and commercial development are within Utility Staging Area 1A. By resolution, the Council may move the two (2) other parcels from Stage 1B (2025- 2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025) but there is no development proposed in this area. The site is proposed to be served by White Bear Township’s municipal water system. A joint powers agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township for sanitary sewer and water shall be completed prior to approval of the final plat. The site proposes a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system shall be evaluated and implemented to the extent it is feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. The attached WSB City Engineer memo details additional information. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the March 26, 2025 Environmental Board staff report: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan does show areas of value for natural resource conservation related to wetlands on the site. The greenway system consists of a Natural Resource Conservation area running along the wetland and lake complex. Trails should be included along Centerville Road and Ash Street and be incorporated into the development along the wetland through the greenway corridor. This should be designed as a multifunction greenway corridor addressing water quality, passive recreation and wildlife habitat. Connectivity should be provided to the north, east, south, and west of the project site. The proposed trail should be looped and connect back in the new proposed road instead of dead ending in the wetland. Staff Comment: 1. A minimum 30-40ft wide pedestrian way/trail loop with minimum 8.5 ft wide trail shall be made from Centerville Road, along Wilkison Way, to the public open space and loop back to the Ash Street trail. This creates a multi-functional greenway corridor. 18 Tree Preservation and Landscaping Per the March 26, 2025 Environmental Board staff report: A tree survey was performed that identified: There were 196 trees surveyed on the site. Tree species present include maple, cottonwood, whit spruce, crab apple, boxelder, pussy willow, aspen, oaks, red pine, and elm. There is a diversity of trees scattered throughout the site based on topography and past land uses. Future submittals should include a table of the species being removed referencing tag number to verify health, size, species, and location. Trees outside of the basic use area will be required to be mitigated. Additionally, all removals should state the management zone in which the tree resides. Non- ESA, Natural Resource Enhancement Area, and Natural Resource Conservation area. Based on the location mitigation requirements vary. It appears there are several trees outside of the basic use area and within the 30’ buffer of the wetland. An updated mitigation plan will be required and evaluated with future submissions to confirm tree replacement and mitigation are being met. Trees that are planned for preservation will require tree protection fence installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence detail. Include a list of species to be planted and number of each species to be planted. Current plans just show large, medium, and large tree totals and aren’t broken down to species. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met. Additional information required to verify mitigation requirements. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. Total Trees Surveyed 196 Trees Removed 38 Significant Trees Removed 30 Basic Use Area Trees Preserved 158 Mitigation Trees Required 19 Required for 409,393 square feet of open space: 164 large trees 328 large shrubs Provided: 164 large trees 328 large shrubs Open Areas Landscape Standards have been met. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. New trees may fulfill canopy coverage, foundation landscape, landscape screen, and open space standards simultaneously if applicable by location. Screening is being provided by a combination of large shrubs (6’), small shrubs (30”), and large tree plantings Buffer and Screen Standards have been met. Additional detail on exact species and locations will be required before final approval. Canopy Cover Canopy cover requirements are a minimum canopy cover of 40% for areas outside of single family and multi-family residential. The total hardscape coverage is 217,670X.04= 87,068 SF. The applicant is proposing to plant 182 trees for canopy coverage. Based on the location each size tree gets a SF credit associated with the planting. The applicant is showing a proposed 87,175 SF of coverage meeting the requirements. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. It does apply to all other uses. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 LF of building. Trees planted within 30’ of the building shall be considered within the foundation landscape zone. Foundation landscaping is required at the front of the building and adjacent to public/private streets. 20 The proposed project has 8,000 linear feet of proposed building subject to the foundation landscape standards. Requirements of 160 large trees and 480 large shrubs are currently being provided. Standards for this section are being met. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Native weed free seed mixes should be shown in stormwater and open space areas to mitigate for the removal of native vegetation with the development. Native vegetation will help establish deeper roots, limit erosion, reduction of irrigation, and provide pollinator habitat. Low maintenance turf grass should be proposed in order to conserve water throughout the site. Additionally native seed mixes should be proposed to create habitat and reduce strain on the water supply system. Plantings adjacent to the buildings should also be drought tolerant to reduce the need for irrigation. If irrigation is not being proposed through reuse native species should be planted where feasible. Environmental Review Record An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed. On February 10, 2025, the City Council passed Resolution No. 25-12 approving the Record of Decision and Making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the North Oaks Mixed Use Development. Wetlands Per the March 3, 2025 Wetland Replacement Plan, there are three (3) wetlands on the site. Wetland Name Area Management Class Base Buffer Width Min Buffer Width Wetland 1 7.95 acres Manage 2 30 ft 24 ft 21 Wetland 7 0.38 acres Manage 3 10 ft 10 ft Wetland 10 0.13 acres Manage 3 10 ft 10 ft TOTALa 8.46 acres aThe wetland replacement plan only includes 8.46 acres that is closest to the development site. The total onsite wetlands are 17.4 acres. Thirty (30) ft wide wetland buffers and conservation easement with wetland signage are required around Wetland 1. There are no wetland impacts to the larger Wetland 1. Wetland 7 and Wetland 10 will be filled and mitigated for by purchasing 0.51 acres of wetland credits. Staff Comment: 1. Wetland buffer signage shall be included on the Site Plans and the City sign detail shall be included to the detail sheets. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain over the large wetland on the west side of the site. It does not appear there are any floodplain impacts. Any floodplain impacts are subject to City requirements per City Code Chapter 1103. Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by ISG in October 2024 as part of the North Oaks Development EAW. Related to the Wilkinson Waters development, the intersections of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH J/Ash Street (Intersection #1) and CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH 32/Ash Street (Intersection #2) were analyzed. Intersection #1 currently operates at a level of service F. Intersection #2 operates at a level of service D. Reconstruction of these major intersections is planned for 2025 and 2026 by Ramsey and Anoka Counties. Intersection 1 and Intersection 2 are proposed to be converted to roundabouts. With these improvements and the proposed Wilkinson Waters development, the level of service will increase to a C. Per City Code Section 1001.013(2)(c)4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. Level of service requirements are met. Noise Study 22 A noise study was prepared by esi engineering dated April 3, 2025. The results of the analysis are based on Minnesota Rule 7030 requirements. Where levels exceeded the residential noise level requirements, recommendations were developed for the building exterior facades to provide the required minimum noise reduction of 30 dBA to 37 dBA. This can be accomplished with higher construction standards for walls, windows, and sliding patios. Additional Review Comments • Anoka County Highway Department notes the proposed ROW line shown should be sufficient. The access on Ash St. will need a right turn lane and will be a right in/right out access. • Ramsey County Public Works will review and provide comments. • MnDNR reviewed the concept plan and noted Shoreland PUD requirements apply including but not limited to density, open space, and impervious surface coverage. No additional comments were provided for the preliminary plat. • City of North Oaks did not provide comments. • White Bear Township did not provide comments. • White Bear Lake ISD#624 did not provide comments. • Lino Lakes Police Division had no concerns with the proposed development. • Lino Lakes Fire Division requests the fire hydrant on the east side of Building B be located south closer to the garage entrance. • City Engineer comments are provided in the attached memo. Park Board Per the April 2, 2025 Park Board staff report, staff recommends 100% cash dedication in lieu of land. The developer will be credited to construct a minimum 8.5 ft wide public trail (depicted in green) from Wilkinson Way to the public open space property and extending the trail to Ash Street. This creates a multi-functional greenway corridor. Future passive amenities including a pavilion and benches could be considered for the public open space property. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the proposal on March 26, 2025. Their comments are attached. Neighborhood Meeting 23 As required, the developer held a neighborhood meeting on February 4, 2025. Their comments are attached. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025. There were two (2) public comments. Concerns included car headlights, building heights, traffic, and open space. The Board’s first motion to deny the project failed 3-3. The second motion included all staff conditions plus headlight screening related to the underground garages passed 4-2. The Board supported the 55ft senior building height. A second public hearing will be held on May 14, 2025. Findings of Fact PUD, Planned Unit Development Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A master plan for this area is not required per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan-Planning District 4. Per Planning District 4, a gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning manual was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The commercial component supports economic expansion. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life-cycle housing. 24 The flexible site design configuration allows for the creation of a multi-functional greenway corridor that incorporates storm water management, wetlands, open space, and trails. The development also promotes conservation and a more efficient use of land. (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The site is within the shoreland districts of Lake Wilkinson and Lake Amelia and adjacent to a large wetland complex. The large wetland will be preserved and enhanced into a multi-purpose greenway corridor and storm water management system. The corridor will also be protected by a vegetative buffer that provides additional protection to the natural resources. A stormwater reuse system will be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The development transitions from low intense townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and the wetland to higher intense apartments near the arterial roads. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. Private streets result in efficient, smaller networks of utilities and streets. This lowers development costs and public investments. (f) Mix of land use types. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types and commercial development. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life-cycle housing that is desirable to the City. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 25 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, page 3-3 of the Land Use Plan: Goal 1, Policy e. details the following additional public values that may be achieved in the Wilkinson Waters concept plan: • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System o 53% open space > than minimum 50% required by Shoreland PUD • Using “Green” building and low impact development techniques • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches • Providing life-cycle and affordable housing • Diversifying the tax base to lessen the tax burden on residential properties Rezoning The four (4) parcels shall be rezoned from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Per City Code Section 1007.015 (4): (e) The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The PUD rezoning is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as amended. The development area is guided Signature Gateway which allows for a mix of higher density residential, commercial services and employment opportunities. 2. The proposed action is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The PUD rezoning is compatible with present and future residential land uses of the area. 3. The proposed action conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed master planned development conforms with all performance standards with minor revisions as noted. 26 4. The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city’s service capacity. The proposed master planned development can be accommodated with White Bear Township’s existing public services and will not overburden the township’s service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed action is within capabilities of streets serving the property as described in § 1007.020(4)(d) of this chapter. Traffic generated by the proposed master planned development is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. Preliminary Plat Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Wilkinson Waters is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; 27 b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Wilkinson Waters is consistent with infill policies. The two (2) easterly lots containing the residential and commercial development are within Utility Staging Area 1A. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, 28 including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Wilkinson Waters meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision will have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision upon completion of Ramsey and Anoka County intersections improvement. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Wilkinson Waters will have an adequate water supply served by White Bear Township. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Wilkinson Waters will be served with an adequate waste disposal system through White Bear Township. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary 29 Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Economic expansion 2. Greater variety of housing types such as townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living that support life-cycle housing 3. Multi-functional greenway corridor and storm water management system 4. Transition from low intense residential development near natural resource to higher intense development near arterial roads 5. Efficient use of land and private streets resulting in a smaller network of utilities and streets 6. Diversified tax base through a mix of residential and commercial land uses 7. Creation and preservation of open space that is accessible to the public 8. More parkland dedication fees available for park/trail development 9. Wider landscape buffers and trail corridors Flexibility Provided: 1. Building height: 40 feet (3-story) and 55 feet (4-story) > allowed 36 feet height in shoreland district. 2. Floor Area: 550 square foot studio apartment unit < required 700 square feet with an additional 100 square feet per bedroom a. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be studio apartments. 3. Townhomes o Base Lot Width: 142ft < 150ft Shoreland PUD requirement o Base Lot Size: 18,239sf < 20,000sf R-4 requirement 4. Multifamily Buildings o Multifamily dwellings do not meet, “Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective.” 5. Setbacks o Multifamily  Building Side Lot Line: 15ft < 20ft requirement o Townhomes  Building Rear Lot Line: 15ft < 30ft requirement  Building Side Lot Line: 10ft < 20ft requirement 30 REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff seeks input regarding proposed 55ft senior building height and other requested PUD flexibility. For the May 27, 2025 Council meeting, staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Site & Building Plan Review for Wilkinson Waters subject to the following conditions: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall be approved by Met Council prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A joint powers agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township for sanitary sewer and water shall be approved prior to approval of the final plat. 3. A Homeowner’s Association shall own and maintain the outlots containing open space, wetlands, buffer, and lake. 4. A Homeowner’s Association shall maintain the landscaped road medians. 5. An outlot shall be created for the upland area of the public park to the west that will be used for passive recreation. a. The outlot shall be deeded to the City. 6. In lieu of public land dedication, the City will collect cash fee. a. Credit will be given for trail construction costs. 7. A trail easement shall cover the trail corridor on Outlot F. 8. A Conservation Easement and/or Wetland Buffer Declaration shall be recorded over the wetlands and buffer. 9. The underlying conventional zoning districts shall be R-4, High Density Residential for the townhomes, apartments, and senior living building and GB, General Business for the commercial. 10. Architecture and building design standards shall meet noise study requirements. 11. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units may be studio apartments. The following items shall be addressed prior to City Council approval of the final plat: 1. All comments from City Engineer memo dated April 2, 2025 2. All comment from Environmental Coordinator memo dated March 26, 2025 3. All comments from Anoka County Highway Department email dated March 27, 2025 4. All comments from Ramsey County Public Works to follow. 5. All lot lines, proposed ROW, etc. on all plan sheets shall be a solid line, not dashed. 6. All Wilkinson Way street right-of-way parking lot setbacks shall be a minimum of 15ft. a. All plan sheets and Design Guidelines shall be revised. 7. A wetland buffer signage location plan shall be created that includes the City sign detail. 31 8. Sheet A0-11, Phasing Plan: a. Delete chart titled Devoted Area. b. The phasing narrative does not match the Design Guidelines narrative. c. Delete density chart d. Move Site Summary chart to Site Plan sheets e. Impervious surface calculations only need to be provided on Land Use & Density Plan. 9. Sheet A0-12, Land Use Plan: a. Insert revised Land Use and Density Plan 10. Sheet A0-16, Preliminary Plat: a. Standard 10ft drainage and utility easement detail shall be included. b. Drainage and utility easements shall be labeled. c. Drainage and utility easement needed over stormwater ponds. d. Outlot D and E shall be lots and blocks on the preliminary plat. i. They can be final platted as outlots. e. Delete setbacks, height requirements, proposed zoning, etc. and just say, “See Design Guidelines for setbacks and building heights”. 11. Sheets AA-20 and AA-21, Apartment Elevations: a. On all elevations, include callouts identifying each material. i. For example, where are the wood finish accents? b. On all elevations, add the building height elevation line. 12. Sheet AC-20, Clubhouse Elevations: a. Add building heights. b. Add exterior materials % and callouts. 13. Sheet AT-20, Townhome Elevations: a. Add stone base around entire buildings. 14. Sheet C3-10, Overall Site Plan: a. Building ID 14 should be senior housing b. Show trail looping through public park to Ash Street. c. The “greenway corridor” sidewalk along Wilkinson Way adjacent to the commercial shall be minimum 8.5ft wide to match trail width. 15. Sheet C3-11, Site Plan: a. On multifamily lot, i. Along the south lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 30ft rear setback. ii. Along the west lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 15ft side setback. b. On the commercial lot, i. Along the north lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 10ft side setback 16. Sheet C3-12, Site Plan: a. Label the lines. b. Label parking lot setback lines. 17. Sheet C3-13, Site Plan: 32 a. Trail shall be minimum 8.5ft wide. 18. Sheet C3-14, Site Plan: a. Label the lines. b. Label parking lot setback lines. 19. Sheet C3-21, Utility Plan: a. The fire hydrant on the east side of Building B shall be located south closer to the garage entrance. 20. Sheet E1-02, Photometric Plan: a. Photometric plans shall be required with future commercial and senior building development. 21. Sheet E1-05, Lighting Cut Sheets and Schedule: a. Light fixture labels shall be clearly noted on the photometric plans. 22. Design Guidelines booklet comments will be provided separately. 23. Six (6) ft tall privacy fences shall be installed along the underground parking lot drive lanes along Ash Street and Centerville Road to screen vehicle headlights. ATTACHMENTS 1. Design Guidelines Booklet with project narrative 2. Phasing Plan 3. Site Plans 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Existing Land Use 5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Proposed Land Use 6. Land Use & Density Plan 7. Housing Goals per 2040 Comprehensive Plan 8. PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Chart 9. Yield Plan 10. Architectural Plans 11. Preliminary Plat 12. Overall Civil and Landscape Plans 13. City Engineer Memo dated April 2, 2025 14. Anoka County Highway Department Email dated March 27, 2025 15. Environmental Board Memo dated March 26, 2025 16. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Attachment 1. Design Guidelines Booklet with project narrative Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES – DESIGN GUIDELINES & STATEMENT OF INTENT WILKINSON WATERS Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 3 Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City of Lino Lakes Rob Rafferty, Mayor Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Katie Larsen, City Panner Diane Hankee, City Engineer, WSB Kendra Lindahl, Landform ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC Mark Houge Lauren Grouws ISG, inc. Jerremy Foss TJ Wells CRW architects and designers Teresa McCormack Savanna Designs, Inc. Jim Hagstrom Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & STATEMENT OF INTENT • Zoning and Planned Land Use • Transportation Systems • Proposed Zoning and Yield Plan • Phasing and Dedication A. Site Plan • Building Setbacks • Parking Setbacks B. Gateway Elements C. Architectural Standards D. Proposed Materials E. Building Heights F. Floor Plan Requirements G. Landscaping H. Signage I. Renderings Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 6 INTRODUCTION & STATEMENT OF INTENT ISG is submitting this PUD Preliminary Plan and Plat Development package on behalf of Anoka Holdings, llc., developer, and North Oaks Farms, Inc., the land owner, for approximately 75.89 acres of land within the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County. The property is generally located at the southwest corner of Centerville Road (County Road 21) and Ash Street (County Road 32), situated in the southeast portion of the City. This project will provide multiple land uses but will be considered as a comprehensive development plan, rather than isolated parcels of development. The proposed land uses include 34,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) – three story 100 unit market rate multi- family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 40 townhome units, and one (1) – 100 unit senior living facility. In addition to these land uses there will be a regional stormwater management system that will be integrated into the natural landscape North of Wilkinson Lake. ZONING AND 2040 PLANNED LAND USE The current property is zoned as Rural according to the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Map. Figure 1 below depicts an aerial with the approximate development property outlined in red. This existing zoning district is guided by the City of Lino Lakes 2024 Comprehensive Plan for a mix of Signature Gateway, High Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential. A snip of the future land use map is below in Figure 2. Additionally, Figure 3 below is a snippet of the Land Use Designation table from the Comprehensive Plan to describe the three uses identified for the proposed parcels. Figure 1: Aerial of Proposed Property Figure 2: Future Land Use Plan (Excerpt) Figure 3: Future Land Use Description Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 7 In addition to the Future Land Use Plan the proposed development also lies within the Shoreland Overlay Zone of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. The shoreland overlay boundary can be seen on the associated submittal plan documents and is governed by a 1,000-foot radius from the ordinary high water level of the associated lakes. The high-water level for Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake are 895.2 and 908.1, respectively. In addition to this Preliminary PUD and Plat submittal Anoka Holdings, llc. is also submitting a concurrent Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow for the orderly development of the parcels, to align with the overall objective of ensuring the Signature Gateway is a welcoming corridor to the City of Lino Lakes. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The transportation network surrounding the proposed development is well established and is also undergoing substantial improvements. These roadway improvements are being completed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County and are currently in the design phase. The easterly frontage of the property is Centerville Road which is currently a rural section two lane road with roadside ditches and no pedestrian paths. The proposed Anoka County Project will improve the road to an urban curb and gutter cross section maintaining two travel lanes, one in each direction, and providing a 10’ pedestrian trail on the westerly side of the right-of-way. The northern frontage is Ash Street which is currently a two-lane rural section roadway with roadside ditches and no pedestrian access, Ash Street will remain in its current condition after development. In addition to the pedestrian and road section improvements along Centerville Road (County Road 21), the intersections of Centerville Road with both Wilkinson Lake Blvd/County Road J and Ash Street (County Road 32) are being improved. Currently, both intersections are controlled with stop signs, Wilkinson Lake Blvd with a 4-way stop and Ash Street with a 1-way stop (this is an existing T- Intersection). The new intersection control, at both intersections, will be a roundabout design and executed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County. Additionally, this new traffic control pattern will help moving traffic from the City of Lino Lake to I-35E directly to the east. The new roundabout at the Wilkinson Lake Blvd and Centerville Road intersection will also assist in providing the proposed development to serve as the Signature Gateway destination as planned in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Both Centerville Road and Ash Street are both functionally classified as Minor Arterials. The existing average annual daily traffic on Ash Street and Centerville Road is 5,100 vehicles per day and 10,700 vehicles per day, respectively (MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application, 2022). Traffic Study has been completed and processed as part of the EAW submittal. Internally, to the proposed development a new street, Wilkinson Way, will be constructed, making a loop connection to the Centerville Road to the East and Ash Street to the north. This proposed ROW will be 60’ wide and will be constructed to the standards of a public street in the City of Lino Lakes. This roadway may be Private or Public and will be determined during the Development Agreement process. If Wilkinson Way remains a private street, a public access and utility easement will be placed overtop to ensure the City of Lino Lakes has access and authority to maintain and operate the proposed public Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 8 utilities. All other roads internal to the development will be private drives and maintained by the development. PROPOSED ZONING & YIELD PLAN This project is being submitted as Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the City of Lino Lakes, a change from the existing zoning classification of Rural. The development team has had multiple meetings with the City Staff to confirm interpretation of the Cities’ Zoning Ordinances, 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and submittal requirements. It has been determined that this project be submitted as PUD with a base zoning of R-4 – High Density Residential and GB – General Business, for the residential and commercial developments, respectively. These parcel zones will lie predominately within the Shoreland Overlay of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake and are also identified to be in the Signature Gateway District, High Density and Medium Density residential districts as indicated on the 2040 comprehensive plan. As such there are a few flexibilities that are being requested to be included as part of the PUD process: Maximum building height to be up to 55 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade, or a maximum of 4 stories, whichever is greater. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi-family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code (1007.114 R-4(5)). In regards to the overall development the below table outlines the described allowable density and the proposed density of the development: Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 9 As shown by the above table, the project is above the maximum unit density by right, however, it is requested that the density of the Signature Gateway be extended to a maximum of 15 units/acre. This request is within the maximum 15 units/acre allowed per the Signature Gateway definition, with City approval, within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. PHASING AND LAND DEDICATION The proposed development will be executed in multiple phases. The initial phase will be the mutli-family residential buildings with an associated clubhouse, followed by a phase of the townhome units. With this initial phasing work, it is the intent of the development to construct the public improvements within the public right-of-way including paving, utilities, and storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the site. The right-of-way will be dedicated back to the City of Lino Lakes along with any public easements needed for utility extensions. Additionally, the regional stormwater management basins will be constructed which will also be utilized as re-use irrigation system for the common spaces throughout the PUD development. All the natural resources that exist, Wilkinson Lake and the wetlands, will be dedicated to the City as Park to be a new amenity to the City. The newly constructed stormwater management ponds will also be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes for Ownership and Maintenance, as a regional solution to stormwater for the development adjacent to Wilkinson Lake, in lieu of multiple smaller stormwater basins that incur additional maintenance cost to the City. All equipment, piping, etc required for the re-use irrigation system will be privately owned and maintained by the developer. The next phases of development will consist of the remaining town home units and retail/commercial development at the southeast corner of the site. Following that would be the construction of the senior living residential building. The final timing and phasing pattern will be coordinated with the City and will be dependent upon the market demand, but the general pattern will follow residential units first followed by the commercial use at the end. We appreciate the opportunity to bring this submittal package before the City of Lino Lakes Staff, Boards and the City of Lino Lakes Council. We look forward to work with the City to bring a development to the community that will make an impact and statement as the southeast entrance into the community. Sincerely, Jerremy Foss, PE Civil Engineering Practice Group Leader Jerremy.Foss@ISGInc.com Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 10 A. SITE PLAN R-4 SETBACKS PER ZONING: From Street Right-of-way Major Collector or arterial street – 40 feet Local or minor collector street – 30 feet Parking lot – 15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Rear lot line Principal Building – 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory building – 5 feet Parking lot – 5 feet Side lot line Principal Building – 20 feet Requesting a flexibility to 10 feet Accessory Building – 5 feet Parking lot – 5 feet Zero lot line- Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied to a common wall of multi-family dwelling units. General Business Setbacks per Zoning ( future ): From Street Right-of-way Major Collector or arterial street – 40 feet Local or minor collector street – 30 feet Parking lot – 15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Rear lot line Principal Building – 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory Building - 5 feet Parking lot – 10 feet Side lot line Principal Building – 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory Building – 10 feet Parking lot – 10 feet Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 10 B. GATEWAY ELEMENTS The Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies Signature Gateway requirements. The Intersection of Centerville Road and Wilkinson Boulevard will serve as the primary entrance to this development. The retail and business center will provide the first impressions and contribute to the character of the community. The architectural standards acknowledged below are the parameters for the design of building and supporting site components. A pallet of materials for the building façades basis of design is included. The landscape and site development will be integrated into the approach and design of the buildings. Exterior Mechanical and Electrical equipment will be screened from view. Signage will be owner provided and maintained. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 11 Proposed Gateway sign theme will be compatible with established tradition of neighboring North Oaks and Waverly Gardens. C. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Wilkinson Waters is planned in accordance with the four-sided architecture as noted in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. All facades will be articulated with a variety of material, glazing, overhangs and details that are engaging to the community and provide visual interest. Street facing facades incorporate offsets in either recesses or projections that support the program of the building at least every 50 feet along the facade. Building design elements should express vertical articulation to support a series of building areas, supported by the offsets and variation in materials. The linear design of the buildings and definition of stories should be supported by the repetition of fenestration heights and alignment, strong repetitive balcony/ canopy lines, Neighborhood connection and pedestrian scale- Materials compatible with natural stone, water, and vegetation. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 12 and accented eaves or cornices. Roof details and eave, cornice lines are to remain consistent on all sides of the building. Architectural Standards. • The exterior walls shall include a variation in building materials distributed throughout the building and coordinated into the design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. • At least 33% of each exterior wall at Multi- Family and Commercial structures shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. • Townhouse and Single-family structures will be composed of a minimum of 25% brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. This is calculated over the combination of all facades. A single façade will not contain more than 75% of a single finish, unless it is brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. • For the purposes of this section, the area of each exterior wall shall not include areas devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. Commercial buildings, if added, will be calculated with Glazing as a finish. • Each exterior wall shall be articulated to add visual interest. Large blank exterior walls should be prohibited. Variation in exterior walls can be accomplished with projections or recesses, material changes, or other methods of building articulation. • Minimum overhang. All dwellings with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12- inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. • All sloped roofs shall be covered with shingles, tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 13 D. PROPOSED MATERIALS Wilkinson Waters will have a pallet of exterior materials that reflect and complement the nature surrounding the site. The pallet below is compatible with the neighboring Waverly Gardens neighborhood. Materials will comply with the Classes of Primary Materials noted in 1007.043. The Elevations will comply with Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 materials as noted in the standards and zoning requirements. See attached spreadsheet noting material calculations. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 14 E. BUILDING HEIGHTS Wilkinson Waters will have a variety of building heights that are reflective of the use and density. Measurement and story determination will be consistent with Minnesota State Building Code for determination of actual dimensions. At Multi- family buildings, the applicant will request the flexibility to be the greater of 4 stories or 55’ from grade to mid-rake of slope roof or top of parapet of flat roof. This language is consistent with1007.115 R-5, (8). The apartments shown below and proposed in this phase are 3 stories with a mid-rake or building height of 3 stories and 39’ mid rake. The multi-family buildings will be the have greater than 33% Class 1 materials on each façade. Visual interest is developed with façade offsets and recessed decks, these elements are further emphasized with roof articulations. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 15 TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS The townhome will be the have greater than 25% Class 1 materials on the combined façade area. Visual interest is developed with façade offsets and recessed decks CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS The Clubhouse will be the have greater than 25% Class 1 materials on the combined façade area. Visual interest is developed with porches and overhangs. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 16 F. FLOOR PLAN REQUIREMENTS Wilkinson Waters is planned in accordance with the Lino Lakes General Building and Use Provisions for the building types proposed. Two Family Dwellings and Townhouses. · Unit width will be a minimum of 24’. · The living area will be greater than 800 sf on the main floor, · An additional 100 sf shall be accounted for to cover utility space and each bedroom. · The attached Garage will be greater than 20’ wide with a minimum footprint of 520 sq.ft. · Decks and patios are included in the initial floor plans. · Storm shelters will be included in the plan, integrated within the usable space. Multi Family Dwellings and Townhouses. · Unit width will be a minimum of 700 sf. With an additional 100 sf. Per each bedroom. · Utility space will be incorporated within each living unit as well as building wide. · Recycling and garbage collection will be within the main building structure. · One parking stall will be provided for each unit in the lower-level parking garage. The plan for this parking garage will conform to 1007.052 Off street parking. Designed as a 90-degree car park stall, a minimum of 9 feet wide and 18’ in length with a minimum aisle of 24’ in width. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 17 G. LANDSCAPING The landscaping concept will support the community aspect of this residential development. Walking paths will connect the residential buildings with the community center and central recreation area. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 18 H. SIGNAGE: DESCRIPTION Signage will be compatible with the buildings and attached pallet, utilizing similar colors and materials. It is understood that exterior sign structures will be individually permitted with the City of Lino Lakes. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 19 I. RENDERINGS ENTRANCE TO APARTMENT EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN VIEW OF APARTMENTS Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 20 EXTERIOR STREET VIEW OF TOWNHOMES Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page | 21 EXTERIOR STREET VIEW OF TOWNHOMES & APARTMENTS RECREATION AND COMMUNITY CENTER Architectural Standards: Multiple-Family Dwellings Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Elevation 1 (Entrance) % Elevation 2 (End) % Elevation 3 (Street Face) % Elevation 4 (End) % Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 34.8%Artificial stone 46.0%Artificial stone 34.0%Artificial stone 33.7% Metal Panel 17.0%Metal Panel 15.0%Metal Panel 14.0%Metal Panel 16.3% Stucco 48.2%Stucco 39.0%Stucco 52.0%Stucco 50.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =34.8%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =46.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =34.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =33.7% TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0% See tables above. REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(c) Parking below building will meet or exceed 1 space per unit. All roof overhangs are 24" with an enclosed soffit. Continous overhang at balconies are 7'. NOTES 1. The exterior walls shall include a variation in building materials distributed throughout the building and coordinated into the design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. 2. At least 33% of each exterior wall shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. 4. Each exterior wall shall be articulated to add visual interest. Large blank exterior walls shall be prohibited. Variation in exterior walls can be accomplished with projections or recesses, material changes, or other methods of building articulation. 5. Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective. Design is artculated to complement the neigbhoring Waverly Gardens. Materials and massing is organized to emphasize the individual living units. Horizontal elements are supported with the strong line and shodow line of the balconies. Recessed Decks provided for each living unit. Areas calculated based on wall area, no doors or windows included Materials Distributed in a consistent patern throughout the façade Sloped roofs will be a textured shingle. 3. For the purposes of this section, the area of each exterior wall shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. 6. Minimum overhang. All dwellings with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12- inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. 7. All sloped roofs shall be covered with shingles, tiles or a standing seam metal roof. 8. A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be in an underground parking area or in a parking area below the building. Architectural Standards: Two Family Dwellings and Townhouse Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Street Elevation % Greenway Elevation % End Elevation North % End Elevation South % Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 42.0%Artificial stone 32.0%Artificial stone 29.0%Artificial stone 29.0% Stucco 58.0%Stucco 68.0%Stucco 71.0%Stucco 71.0% [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =42.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =32.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =29.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =29.0% TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0% Units are 29' wide See tables above. Sloped roof will have textured shingles Garages are 22' wide and exceed 600 sf. 6. Homeowners association. A homeowners association shall be established for all townhouses, multiple-family and townhouse developments subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall be responsible for all exterior building maintenance, approval of any exterior architectural modifications, landscaping, snow clearing and regular maintenance of private streets and other areas owned in common when there is more than one individual property owner having interest within the development. 1. Unit width. The minimum width of a two-family or townhouse dwelling unit shall be 24 feet. The minimum footprint per unit shall be established within the zoning district. iii. For the purpose of this section, the area of the building walls shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. e. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall be covered with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. 3. Storm shelter. In cases where dwelling units are constructed slab on-grade, provisions shall be made to provide for storm protection either internally to the unit or in a separate storm shelter structure. Compliance with this requirement shall be based upon Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines and standards which are on file with the City Building Official. 4. Garages. Each dwelling unit shall have a garage that is a minimum of 20 feet in width and has a minimum footprint of 520 square feet. 5. Utilities. a. Public utility service. Separate public utility services shall be provided to each unit unless exempted by the City Engineer. c. Minimum overhang. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12 inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. d. Exterior building finish. The exterior of townhouse dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades on all sides and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhouse dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: i. A minimum of 25% of the combined area of all building walls shall have an exterior finish of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. ii. Except for brick, natural stone, or artificial stone, no single building wall shall have more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. 2. Unit construction. a. Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished illustrating exterior building materials and colors to demonstrate compliance with division (2)(b)2.d. below. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. b. Decks or porches. Provisions shall be made for possible decks, porches, or additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. Overhangs are 24" and have enclosed soffits REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(b) NOTES See tables above.- Aggregate of all elevations provides 25% stone and 75% Stucco with decorative trim b. Sewer connection. Where more than one unit is served by a sanitary sewer service, all maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owners. Architectural Standards: Two Family Dwellings and Townhouse Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Entry / West Elevation % Pool Side/ East Elevation % South Elevation % North Elevation % Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 53.0%Artificial stone 42.0%Artificial stone 64.0%Artificial stone 31.0% Stucco 47.0%Stucco 58.0%Stucco 36.0%Stucco 69.0% [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =53.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =42.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =64.0%TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % =31.0% TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0%TOTAL Elevation % =100.0% NA See tables above. See tables above. Sloped roof will have textured shingles No garage on this stsructure REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(b) NOTES 1. Unit width. The minimum width of a two-family or townhouse dwelling unit shall be 24 feet. The minimum footprint per unit shall be established within the zoning district. 2. Unit construction. a. Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished illustrating exterior building materials and colors to demonstrate compliance with division (2)(b)2.d. below. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. 6. Homeowners association. A homeowners association shall be established for all townhouses, multiple-family and townhouse developments subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall be responsible for all exterior building maintenance, approval of any exterior architectural modifications, landscaping, snow clearing and regular maintenance of private streets and other areas owned in common when there is more than one individual property owner having interest within the development. Clubhouse is of similar architecture to townhouses and apartment building Porches and exterior structures are a part of the original design. e. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall be covered with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. 3. Storm shelter. In cases where dwelling units are constructed slab on-grade, provisions shall be made to provide for storm protection either internally to the unit or in a separate storm shelter structure. Compliance with this requirement shall be based upon Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines and standards which are on file with the City Building Official. 4. Garages. Each dwelling unit shall have a garage that is a minimum of 20 feet in width and has a minimum footprint of 520 square feet. 5. Utilities. a. Public utility service. Separate public utility services shall be provided to each unit unless exempted by the City Engineer. b. Sewer connection. Where more than one unit is served by a sanitary sewer service, all maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owners. c. Minimum overhang. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12 inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit.Overhangs are 24" and have enclosed soffits d. Exterior building finish. The exterior of townhouse dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades on all sides and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhouse dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: i. A minimum of 25% of the combined area of all building walls shall have an exterior finish of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. ii. Except for brick, natural stone, or artificial stone, no single building wall shall have more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. iii. For the purpose of this section, the area of the building walls shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. b. Decks or porches. Provisions shall be made for possible decks, porches, or additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 U FO UFO FO U UFO MB V EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX SB-st-13 U U G U U UG U V WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WE T WET WET WET WET WE T WET 30 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P WA T E R A N D S E W E R E A S M E N T AP P R O X . O R D I N A R Y HIG H W A T E R L E V E L 89 5 . 2 NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 0 0 0 1 NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 0 0 0 8 NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 0 0 0 2 CO U N T Y O F A N O K A 61 0 1 C E N T E R V I L L E R D 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 4 BIRC H E R A L E C 1613 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 GRO V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1605 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 ROD E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1603 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 SAG D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1601 A S H S T 35-31 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 25 ' W A T E R A N D S E W E R EA S E M E N T SHOR E L A N D OVERL A Y (AME L I A L A K E ) (WILKI N S O N L A K E ) 1000' SHORE L A N D OVERL A Y WIL K I N S O N L A K E O R D I N A R Y H I G H W A T E R L I N E EM LS Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 PR E S B Y T E R I A N H O M E S O F N O R T H O A K S I N C 59 1 9 C E N T E R V I L L E R D 04 3 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 9 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY ' BUILDING SETBACK40 ' PARKING SETBACK15 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 ' BUILDING SETBACK 30 ' BUIL D I N G S E T B A C K 30 ' BUILDING SETBACK40 XX X X 5 11 X X X X X ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 40 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 ' BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K 30 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 9 2 0 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 W PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924.0 1 WILKI N S O N W A Y PROPOSED BAS I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 1.47 m p h Faste s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) West L e g ( W e s t ) North L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 9 2 2 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X 30671 C3-SITE-OVERALL DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \ \ I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E - O V E R A L L . D W G S A V E D B Y : T J . W E L L S WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 A0-11 PHASING PLAN A0-11 PHASING PLAN 300 30671 A0-11 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 DEVOTED AREA TOTAL SITE AREA:75.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USES:56 AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USES:18.5 AC (24%) AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USE BY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TYPE OR USE TYPE (PROPOSED RANGE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING SIZES): TOWNHOUSE:7,500 SF APARTMENT / SENIOR LIVING:43,500 - 46,000 COMMERCIAL:5,500 - 18,050 AREA DEVOTED TO COMMON OPEN SPACE:0.0 AC AREA DEVOTED TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:45.5 AC (60%) AREA DEVOTED TO STREETS:6.7 AC (9%) AREA DEVOTED TO COMMERCIAL USES:5.2 AC (7%) AREA DEVOTED TO INDUSTRIAL OR OFFICE USES:0.0 AC PHASE 1A PHASE 1B PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PROJECT PHASES PHASE USE DWELLING UNITS GROSS PARCEL AREA (ACRE) DEVELOPABLE AREA (ACRE) RIGHT-OF-WAY (ACRE) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (ACRE) PHASE 1A RESIDENTIAL 200 75.9 9.3 6.7 45.9 PHASE 1B RESIDENTIAL 20 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 20 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 PHASE 3 SENIOR RESIDENTIAL 100 3.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 PHASE 4 COMMERCIAL -5.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 PHASE 1 WILL INCLUDE MASS GRADING OF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AREA AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FEATURES FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS WILKINSON LAKE. PHASE 1A WILL CONSIST OF THE MARKET RATE RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDINGS. EACH BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO HAVE 100 UNITS. THESE BUILDINGS WILL BE STAGGERED IN CONSTRUCTION STAGING. PHASE 1B WILL CONSIST OF HALF OF THE TOWNHOME UNITS AND THESE WILL COME ONLINE TOWARDS THE END OF COMPLETION OF THE MARKET RATE APARTMENT UNITS. PHASE 2 WILL CONSIST OF THE WESTERN HALF OF THE TOWNHOME UNITS. PHASE 3 WILL BE SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS. PHASE 4 WILL BE THE COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENT AND THESE BUILDINGS MAY COME ONLINE AT MULTIPLE INDIVIDUAL PHASES AS WELL. *ALL PHASING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS AND DEPENDENT ON MARKET CONDITIONS SITE SUMMARY PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: S34 T31N R22W LINO LAKES, MN EXISTING ZONING:R ZONING PUD SITE/LOT AREA:3,305,769 SF (75.9 AC) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS:0 SF (0.0 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:641,203 SF (14.7 AC) DISTURBED AREA:1,310,712 SF (30.1 AC) PARKING STALLS PROVIDED MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT SURFACE PARKING 191 COVERED PARKING 210 TOTAL 401 (400 REQUIRED) PARKING STALLS PROVIDED TOWNHOMES SURFACE PARKING 40 COVERED PARKING 40 TOTAL 80 (80 REQUIRED) PARKING TOTALS ARE ONLY REFLECTIVE OF THE MARKET RATE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT SITE AND TOWNHOMES. REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SITE ARE 2 PARKING UNITS PER UNIT WITH AT LEAST HALF OF THE UNITS BEING COVERED PARKING SPACES. COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE 1 SPACE PER 200 SQ FEET. THE FINAL PARKING COUNTS WILL BE PROVIDED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SENIOR FAMILY PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE 1.5 PER UNIT WITH AT HALF OF THE SPACES PROVIDED BEING UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS. FINAL PARKING COUNTS WILL BE PROVIDED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE SENIOR APARTMENTS. GARBAGE WASTE AND RECYCLING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING LEVEL OF THE BUILDING. NOTE: BELOW CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON REVISED CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT APPLICATION - SUBMITTED SEPARATELY TO THIS APPLICATION. PROPOSED PUBLIC TRAIL THROUGH WETLANDS AND CONNECTED TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLIC TRAIL CONSTRUCTED WITH RAMSEY COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS TO CENTERVILLE ROAD FUTURE ANOKA COUNTY TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ASH STREET IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO CONNECT ALL THREE PUBLIC TRAILS Attachment 2. Phasing Plan BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 FO UFO FO U UFO MB V U G U U G UUUGU G U V WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T W E T WET W E T WET WET WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET WET 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 50 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R 34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 WRUCK, GARY D 1443 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 1465 ASH ST 34-31-22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D & A 1487 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J 1509 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0001 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 LANZ KENT C & JEANNINE A 1579 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 BI R C H E R A L E C 16 1 3 A S H S T 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1 6 0 5 A S H S T 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 16 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 16 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (WILKENSON LAKE) 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (A M E L I A L A K E ) ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE EM LS Easement per Doc. No. 252087 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (W I L K E N S O N L A K E ) 13 19 15 13 PROP O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 2 100 YR H W L = 922.16 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X 13 4 9 14 10 14 13 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 W I L K I N S O N W A Y 5 11 X X X W W I L K I N S O N W A Y 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WE T W E T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WE T WE T ASH STREET C E N T E R V I L L E R D 30671 C3-SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \ \ I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : T J . W E L L S WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-10 OVERALL SITE PLAN C3-10 OVERALL SITE PLAN 300 30671 C3-10 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 120 240 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY 100 UNITS WETLAND 1 MANAGE 2 WETLAND 10 (TO BE MITIGATED) WETLAND 7 (TO BE MITIGATED) 30' WETLAND BUFFER & CONSERVATION EASEMENT 30' WETLAND BUFFER & CONSERVATION EASEMENT FUTURE ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION BY ANOKA COUNTY GREENWA Y C O R R I D O R G R E E N W A Y C O R R I D O R P R O P O S E D P U B L I C S I D E W A L K P R O P O S E D T R A I L ( B Y C O U N T Y ) PROPOSED TRAIL (BY COUNTY) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 15 17 BUILDING ID NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE 1 100 -APARTMENTS 2 100 -APARTMENTS 3 --CLUBHOUSE 4 4 -TOWNHOME 5 4 -TOWNHOME 6 4 -TOWNHOME 7 4 -TOWNHOME BUILDING ID NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE 8 4 -TOWNHOME 9 4 -TOWNHOME 10 4 -TOWNHOME 11 4 -TOWNHOME 12 4 -TOWNHOME 13 4 -TOWNHOME 14 100 -TOWNHOME BUILDING ID NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE 15 -10,500 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL 16 -5,488 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL 17 -18,012 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL NOTE: DETAILED SITE PLAN SHEETS ARE LOCATED ON SHEETS C3-11 TO C3-14 LAKE AMELIA Attachment 3. Site Plans FO U UFO MB UU U G U V CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 0 0 0 2 CO U N T Y O F A N O K A 61 0 1 C E N T E R V I L L E R D 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 4 BIRC H E R A L E C 1613 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 32 X X X X X X X X PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY ' BUILDING SETBACK40 ' PARKING SETBACK15 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 X X X X X X X X X X X X BUILDING A FFE = 934 LFE = 923 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 927 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 40 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 20 ' 20 ' 24 ' 7' 10' 39 . 5 5 ' 26.83' R 2 5 ' R 5 0 ' R3'R3'R 1 0 ' R2 5 ' R5 0 ' 40.34' 27 . 3 3 ' R20' R20'R 2 0 ' R3' R1 5 ' R3' R 3 ' R3' R10' R38.33' 27.33' 27.33 ' R20' R1 5 ' R5' R3' R53 . 3 3 ' R2 5 ' 27.33 ' 39 . 5 5 ' 40.34' 2 3 ' 10' 10'R5' R 2 3 5 ' R 2 3 5 ' 8' 20' R3 ' 24'24' 24 ' 7' 5'5' 5. 3 3 ' 5' 5' R 3 ' R25 ' R3' R 3 ' R2 0 0 'R200' R3' R181.67' R234.33' R10' R2 3 4 . 3 3 ' R10' R5' R6 6 ' R4 2 ' R 6 8 . 8 3 ' R 4 4 . 8 3 ' 5' 10' 10' 33.33 ' R3' R176.67' R3' 10' 10 ' R20' R20 ' 1.47 m p h Fast e s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) Wes t L e g ( W e s t ) Nort h L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 60 ' RO W 30 ' B- B 5' 16 ' 16.03' 7' 20' TYP 16 . 1 ' 16' 34.24' 2. 6 4 ' 15 . 7 5 ' 18 . 3 9 ' 10' 5' 16 . 1 1 ' 2. 6 4 ' 10' 18 . 3 9 ' 12 4 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 10 ' ( T Y P ) 60 ' RO W 30 ' B- B R50' 32.11' 8' 8 ' 19' R3' R 3 ' 28' R5' R3' 30671 C3-SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-11 SITE PLAN C3-11 SITE PLAN 300 30671 C3-11 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 4" WIDE WHITE SOLID STALL (TYP) ACCESSIBLE PARKING MARKING (TYP) PROPOSED ROW (TYP) EXISTING ROW (TYP) PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP) CONCRETE WALK (TYP) FENCE (TYP) R 1 0 ' 7' RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE (TYP) PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP) 10' UTILITY EASEMENTS 10' UTILITY EASEMENTS 40' S E T B A C K 15 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 15' REAR SETBACK 15' REAR SETBACK 15' REAR SETBACK 15 ' R E A R S E T B A C K 15 ' R E A R S E T B A C K PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MONUMENT LOCATION FUTURE AMENITY FUTURE AMENITY 5' RETAINING WALL (TYP) RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL (TYP) RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETATINING WALL RETAINING WALL FDC CONNECTION FDC CONNECTION 5' 25' 34 ' 5' U U FO FO U FO V V WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X X X X X X PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 934.52 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 929.58 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 ' PARKING SETBACK15 ' BUILD I N G S E T B A C K 30 ' BUILDING SETBACK40 X X X X X X 11 ' BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K 30 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 WILKI N S O N W A Y 40.34' 30' R 2 3 5 ' R 2 3 5 ' R20 ' R20' R234.5' R200' R20 ' R20' R169.09' R200' R3' R181.67' 5' 33.33 ' R3' R176.67' 10 ' R20' R20 ' R 1 1 . 5 4 ' R11.54 ' 34.24' 16' B- B 16' B- B 76' R O W 14' R 3 0 ' R30' R3' R30' R 3 0 ' R3' R3 0 ' R3 0 ' R3' R2 5 ' R26.33 ' 32. 6 7 ' 19.98' B-B 19.69' B-B 23.01' 45.98' B-B 9 1 0 11 12 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 18 18 31.04' 32.11' 9.82' 8' 8' 8' 27 . 3 3 ' 27 . 3 3 ' 27 . 3 3 ' 19 ' 19 ' 12' 19 ' 27.33'19' 19 ' 19'19' 29.25 ' 12 ' 19 ' 19 ' 19 ' 19' 27.33' 27.33' R12. 8 3 ' R 3 ' R1 2 . 8 3 ' R2.8 3 ' R15' R 1 5 ' R3' R 1 2 . 8 3 ' R3' R15' R3 ' R1 5 ' R3' R15' R 3 ' R1 5 ' R3 ' R 3 ' R2 3 ' R 3 ' R3'R 1 5 ' R15' R 3 ' R3' R1 5 ' R 3 ' R15' R15' R3 ' R3' R3 ' 19 ' 27.34' 19' 19' 1 9 ' 2 7 . 3 4 ' 1 9 ' 27.34' 28' R5' R3' R3' R5' R3' R4' R5' R 5 ' R16.09' R3 1 . 3 9 ' R10 . 5 ' R 3 0 ' R4 2 . 8 ' 2 7 . 3 4 ' 27. 2 6 ' 15.84' 30671 C3-SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-12 SITE PLAN C3-12 SITE PLAN 300 30671 C3-12 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 PROPOSED ROW (TYP) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TYP) EXISTING ROW (TYP) PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP) PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK PROPOSED LANDCAPE MONUMENT LOCATION FUTURE AMENITY PROPOSED SWALE (TYP) U G U G U X AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WE T NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 0 0 0 8 WO O D S T R O M , J E R R Y A 15 9 1 A S H S T . 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 1 - 0 0 0 1 SAGD A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1601 A S H S T 35-31 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 WILKINSON WAY ' BUILDING SETBACK30 ' BUILDING SETBACK 30 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L1 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 916.6 L2 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.9 L3 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.7 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 39 . 5 5 ' 8' 5' R 3 ' R3' 60 ' RO W 30 ' B- B 2. 6 4 ' 15 . 7 5 ' 18 . 3 9 ' 10' 30 ' 16 . 1 1 ' 2.6 4 ' 10' 18 . 3 9 ' R25' R 2 5 ' 20' 30 ' 20' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 30671 C3-SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-13 SITE PLAN C3-13 SITE PLAN 300 30671 C3-13 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500SWALE (TYP) HYDRANT (TYP) EXISTING ROW (TYP) RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK 10' UTILITY EASEMENTS 10' UTILITY EASEMENTS 15' REAR SETBACK 10 ' S I D E S E T B A C K 30" WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING MANAGE 2 WETLAND RETAINING WALL BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D W W W W W W W W W W W W WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T 30 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P WA T E R A N D S E W E R E A S M E N T AP P R O X . O R D I N A R Y HIG H W A T E R L E V E L 895 . 2 EM LS 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 2 . 1 6 PROP O S E D B U I L D I N G FFE = 925 WILKINSON WAY ' BUILDING SETBACK 30 5 TOWNHOUSE L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 ' BUILDING SETBACK30 ' BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K 30 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924 . 0 1 PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 39 . 5 5 ' 30' R 2 3 5 ' R 2 3 5 ' 8' 20' 8' 5'5' R20' R 3 ' R3' R 3 ' R20 0 'R200' R3' R181.67' R234.33' R2 3 4 . 3 3 ' R10' R5' R6 6 ' R4 2 ' 33.33 ' R176.67' R20' R20 ' 5' 2. 6 4 ' 15 . 7 5 ' 18 . 3 9 ' 10' 5' 16' B- B 16' B- B 76' RO W 14' R 3 0 ' R30' R3' R30' R 3 0 ' R3' 19.98' B-B 16.37' 20' 20' 30 ' 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 1 3 60 ' RO W 30 ' B- B R50' 8' 8' 27.34' 19' 19' 1 9 ' 2 7 . 3 4 ' 1 9 ' 27.34' 28' R5' R3' R3' R5' R3' R4' R5' R 5 ' R16.09' R3 1 . 3 9 ' R10. 5 ' R 3 0 ' 2 7 . 3 4 ' 27 . 2 6 ' 15.84' 30671 C3-SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-14 SITE PLAN C3-14 SITE PLAN 300 30671 C3-14 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 8' PROPOSED ROW (TYP) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TYP) RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL HYDRANT (TYP) PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP) PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP) PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK 10' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T S 10' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T S PROPOSED STORMWATER RE-USE IRRIGATION WELL 30" WETLAND BUFFER & CONSERVATION EASEMENT RETAINING WALL EXISTING MANAGE 2 WETLAND G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V O H L V O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G G G G G F B O F B O F B O F B O EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- OHL OHL G O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G EX SB-st-13 U U G UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM STM OHL OHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WET WE T WET WE T WET WE T W E T WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE <II <II <II<II<II <II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T W E T WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70 ' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 5 0 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R 34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 WRUCK, GARY D 1443 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0003 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST. 34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-34-0001 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 1465 ASH ST 34-31-22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D & A 1487 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J 1509 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0001 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 LANZ KENT C & JEANNINE A 1579 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 16 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T EM LS Easement per Doc. No. 252087 >>>>>>>> <II<II<II<II<II > > > > > > ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\DENSITY CALCS\30671 CONCEPT 11 - EXISTING COMP PLAN MAP-NOSITE PLAN.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS EXISTING CITY OF LINO LKAES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 02/10/2025 MEDIUM DENSITY WILKINSON LAKE 13 4 9 14 10 14 13 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 5 11 X X W 13 19 15 13 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X RAMSEY COUNTY EXISTING CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION POINT SIGNATURE GATEWAY HIGH DENSITY ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 03102025 ELECTRICAL EASEMENT ARTERIAL ROW PROPOS E D G R E E N W A Y C O O R I R D O R T R A I L PID #34-31-22-43-0006 PID #34-31-22-44-0001 PID #34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 Attachment 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Existing Land Use G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V O H L V O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G G G G G F B O F B O F B O F B O EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- OHL OHL G O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L G G EX SB-st-13 U U G UUUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM STM OHL OHLOHLOHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WET WE T WET WE T WET WE T W E T WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE <II <II <II<II<II <II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET W E T WE T W E T WE T WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70 ' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 5 0 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R 34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 WRUCK, GARY D 1443 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0003 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST. 34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-34-0001 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 1465 ASH ST 34-31-22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D & A 1487 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J 1509 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0001 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 LANZ KENT C & JEANNINE A 1579 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 16 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T EM LS Easement per Doc. No. 252087 >>>>>>>> <II<II<II<II<II > > > > > > ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 5 11 PR O P O S E D P O N D ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\30000 PROJ\30600-30699\30671 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENTMASTER P-LINO LAKES MN\30671 PRODUCTION FILES\30671 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\DENSITY CALCS\30671 PROPOSED COMP PLAN MAP.DWG SAVED BY: TJ.WELLS PROPOSED CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 02/10/2025 MEDIUM DENSITY WILKINSON LAKE 13 4 9 14 10 14 13 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 5 11 X X W 13 19 15 13 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X RAMSEY COUNTY SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION POINT SIGNATURE GATEWAY ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 03102025 ELECTRICAL EASEMENT ARTERIAL ROW PROPOSE D G R E E N W A Y C O O R I R D O R T R A I L PID #34-31-22-43-0006 PID #34-31-22-44-0001 PID #34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 Attachment 5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Proposed Land Use 13 4 9 14 10 14 13 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 W I L K I N S O N W A Y ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 4 0 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 0 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 0 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 30 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 4 0 5 11 X X ' BUILDING SETBACK40 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 0 ' BUIL D I N G S E T B A C K 30 W W I L K I N S O N W A Y BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V V I=907.79I=908.98 EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- G G EX SB-st-13 U U G UUUGU G U V WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WE T WET WE T WET WE T W E T WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WE T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WE T WETWET W E T WE T WET WET 5 0 ' C I T Y O F S T . P A U L W A T E R L I N E R O W 70' O V E R H E A D E L E C T R I C UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 50 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P W A T E R A N D S E W E R E A S E M E N T 30' WHITE B E A R T O W N S H I P WATER AND S E W E R E A S M E N T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0010 SHEAREN, WILLIAM R 34-31-22-43-0013 BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 WRUCK, GARY D 1443 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0003 EDDY, ROGER B 6097 ASH ST. 34-31-22-34-0003 EDDY, VICTORIA A 34-31-22-43-0002 ROGALLA, SARA R 6063 ASH ST 34-31-22-34-0006 HANSON, SCOTT B 34-31-22-34-0005 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-34-0001 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 1465 ASH ST 34-31-22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D & A 1487 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J 1509 ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0001 MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 LANZ KENT C & JEANNINE A 1579 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 16 1 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 1 6 0 5 A S H S T 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 COUNTY OF ANOKA 1697 ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 25' WA T E R A N D S E W E R EASEM E N T YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (WILKENSON LAKE) 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y 10 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (A M E L I A L A K E ) ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y WILKINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE EM LS PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 YALREVO DNALEROHS '0001 (W I L K E N S O N L A K E ) WILKINSON LAKE AMELIA LAKE 13 19 15 13 PROP O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 2 100 YR H W L = 922.16 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X 30671 C3-LAND USE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : S : \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - L A N D U S E . D W G S A V E D B Y : D A Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 A0-12 LAND USE & DENSITY PLAN A0-12 LAND USE & DENSITY PLAN 300 30671 A0-12 MINNESOTALINO LAKES0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION AREA MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING 3.8 AC COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 4.9 AC SENIOR LIVING BUILDING 1.0 AC PRIVATE ROADWAY 4.2 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 3.9 AC PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 11.1 AC LAKE (NWL)16.7 AC STORM PONDS 1.8 AC WETLANDS (REMAINING)20.0 AC PUBLIC ROW (ARTERIAL)4.1 AC PUBLIC ROW (DEVELOPMENT)2.3 AC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EASEMENT 2.1 AC SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA:75.9 AC TOTAL R.O.W. AREA:6.4 AC RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA:21.9 AC COMMERCIAL LOT AREA:4.9 AC TOTAL PUBLIC WATER AREA:36.7 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:3.9 AC EASEMENT AREA 2.1 AC SITE DATA TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS:340 APARTMENTS:200 SENIOR LIVING:100 TOWNHOMES:40 SOIL BORINGS: BRAUN INTERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 952-995-2000 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. L1 B1 L2 B1 L3 B1 L4 B1 L5 B1 L5 B2 L4 B2 L3 B2 L2 B2 L1 B2 L6 B2 OUTLOT E OUTLOT D NOTE: PER SHORELAND OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE SHALL BE 35% FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND 60% FOR COMMERCIAL USES. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTING A FLEXIBILITY TO CONSIDER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA BASED ON THE AGGREGATE AREA OF THE ENTIRE PLATTED LAND. THIS IS SHOWN IN THE ADJACENT TABLE. NOTE: THIS TABLE IS THE SUM OF ALL TABULATED RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TABLE ON THE LEFT. A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH IN REGARDS WITH THE ROW IS TAKEN ASSUMING THAT 100% OF THE ROW IS IMPERVIOUS. WITH THIS APPROACH IT CAN BE FOUND THAT THE AGGREGATE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE IS BELOW THE RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE THRESHOLD OF 35%. WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THE FLEXIBILITY FOR IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT BE CONSIDERED BASED OFF OF THE ENTIRETY OF THE PLATTED AREA AND NOT BASED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL SUBDIVIDED PARCEL. PLEASE NOTE THAT OUTLOT D AND OUTLOT E ARE NOT THE FINAL PLAN ALIGNMENTS BUT A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT OF THOSE PARCELS, HOWEVER EVEN IF THE ENTIRE PARCEL AREA WAS INCLUDED IN THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE COLUMN THE AGGREGATE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE WOULD STILL BE BELOW THE 35% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE THRESHOLD. OUTLOT F 3/20/2025 TABLE AND CALCULATION REVISIONSTJW OUTLOT G WETLANDS: KJOLHAUG ENVRIONMENTAL SERVICES 2500 SHADYWOOD RD SUITE 130 MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 952-401-8757 Attachment 6. Land Use & Density Plan Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 4: Housing 4-2 • Goals and Policies The vision statement, as described in Chapter 1, defines what Lino Lakes should look like in the future. The goals and policies guide the Housing Plan to help achieve that vision for housing development. The goals and policies that follow were established in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reaffirmed as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan process. Goal 1: Improve availability of affordable and life-cycle housing� Policies: a�Work with developers to identify innovative strategies for providing entry-level and life cycle housing� b�Use redevelopment tools to revitalize aging residential properties, made possible by various federal, state, local government, and non-profit programs. c�Provide expanded opportunities for housing ownership made available by various federal, state, local government and non-profit agencies. d�Provide for and designate appropriate areas for high-density development� e�Strive to integrate affordable housing in all residential land use districts� Goal 2: Enhance opportunities for senior housing� Policies: a� Develop partnerships with non-profit and private sector groups who assist in the creation of senior housing. b� Coordinate development of housing with retail accessibility (restaurants, shops, groceries)� Goal 3: Maintain existing housing stock to insure a high-quality environment in all residential neighborhoods� Policies: a� Promote the improvement of the existing housing stock, and to encourage the rehabilitation or redevelopment of substandard housing b� Encourage in-fill housing where appropriate. Goal 4: The City will consider all widely accepted housing tools, as appropriate on an individual basis, including: • Housing Bonds • Tax Abatement • Consolidated Request for Proposals from Minnesota Housing • Site Assembly • Livable Communities Act programs • CDBG and HOME through Anoka County • Adopting a Local Fair Housing Policy • Participation in housing related organizations, partnerships, and initiatives • Preservation of existing Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) units • Community Land Trust • Manufactured Home Park Preservation • Tools that preserve private unsubsidized affordable housing (including but not limited to a local 4d program, tax incentives, etc�) 1,2,3 1,2,3:Tools in this list will be considered for housing goals numbered elsewhere in the plan 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,3 1,3 1,2 1,2 1 Attachment 7. Housing Goals per 2040 Comprehensive Plan WILKINSON WATERS PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations Sheets A0-16 Preliminary Plat dated February 10, 2025 Correlating Conventional Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Zoning District Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Medium Density Res R-2, Two Family Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot)50 150 7,500 R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family (unit lot)50 NA 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome (base)100 NA 24,000 Signature Gateway R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family or max. 8 unit townhome 100 NA 24,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome 150a NA 20,000 142 NA 18,239 Yes R-4, High Density Residential multi-family (base)150a NA 20,000 487 NA 9.3 acres No R-4, High Density Residential senior living (base)150a NA 20,000 750 NA 3.9 acres No NB, Neighborhood Business Commercial 100 NA 11,250 GB, General Business Commercial 100 NA 20,000 620 NA 5 acres No aShoreland PUD requires 150ft wide lot width for townhomes and apartments NA-proposing GB guidelines NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA-no two-family proposed 3/26/2025 City of Lino Lakes PUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan Attachment 8. PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines and Shoreland Chart 4 P R O P O S E D S T R E E T 12 12 2 0 U N I T S 10 10 10 102 8 U N I T S 10 10 10 10 28 UNI T S 24 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 9 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1.47 mph Fastest Line Entry Speed too large South Leg (South) West Leg (West) North Leg (North) Ash / Centerville Roundabout STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 1.0 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.6 ACRES 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 6 11 10 10 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 28 U N I T S 10 10 1010 10 4 8 10 14 10 1 0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = .2 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.8 ACRES 2 4 U N I T S 10 9 2 4 U N I T S 9 9 10 10 10 6 6 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.2 ACRES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.8 ACRES 16 UNITS 9 9 8 8 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = 0.45 ACRES WE T WE T W E T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T 10 10 10 10 2 8 U N I T S 9 8 U N I T S 2 8 U N I T S BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 FO UFO FO U UFO MB V EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX SB-st-13 U U G U UUGU G U V WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R D ASH STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WET W E T WE T WE T W E T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET W E T WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T W E T WE T WE T WET WET WET WET W E T WE T WET W E T APPROX. ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL 895.2 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0001 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-43-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0008 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J MALLMAN, KELSEY M 1557 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0008 HALL, LAWRENCE M 1565 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0004 CERONSKY, CAROLYN M 1573 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 34-31-22-41-0006 WOODSTROM, JERRY A 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 COUNTY OF ANOKA 6101 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-32-0004 B I R C H E R A L E C 1 6 1 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 G R O V E B R A D & J A W O R S K I M 16 0 5 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 R O D E N , N O E L L E K A T H E R I N E 1 6 0 3 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 6 S A G D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1 6 0 1 A S H S T 3 5 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 DONLIN AMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-33-0005 GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTERVILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 043022320002 1 0 0 0 ' S H O R E L A N D O V E R L A Y (A M E L I A L A K E ) ( W I L K I N S O N L A K E ) ( A M E L I A L A K E ) 10 0 0 ' SH O R E L A N D OV E R L A Y EM LS Easement per Doc. No. 252087 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF NORTH OAKS INC 5919 CENTERVILLE RD 043022210019 30671 C3-SITE-YIELD DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \ \ I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - S I T E - Y I E L D . D W G S A V E D B Y : T J . W E L L S WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 A0-13 YIELD PLAN A0-13 YIELD PLAN 300 30671 A0-13 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) GARAGE (TYP.) 100 UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 Attachment 9. Yield Plan NUMBER DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / S t a l l a n d L i n o L a k e s / A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g 1 0 . 2 8 . 2 4 . r v t 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 1 0 : 5 7 A M A0 01/19/2021 PROJECT IMAGERY AND MATERIALS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA WILKINSON WATERS 24-027 01/19/2021 Author Checker Checker 24-027 NO.REVISIONS DATE Attachment 10. Architectural Plans LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2111' - 2 5/8" ROOF132' - 5 1/4" LEVEL 3122' - 5 1/4" PARKING88' - 10" 6 37 LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2111' - 2 5/8" ROOF132' - 5 1/4" LEVEL 3122' - 5 1/4" PARKING88' - 10" 6 3 736 7 733 NUMBER DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.© 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / S t a l l a n d L i n o L a k e s / A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g 1 0 . 2 8 . 2 4 .r v t 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 2 : 1 6 P M AA-20 01/19/2021 APARTMENT ELEVATIONS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA WILKINSON WATERS 24-027 01/19/2021 Author Checker Checker 24-027 1/16" = 1'-0"1 ENTRY ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 END ELEVATION AT GARAGE ENTRY NO.REVISIONS DATE LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2111' - 2 5/8" ROOF132' - 5 1/4" LEVEL 3122' - 5 1/4" PARKING88' - 10" 6 3 7 7 3 6 39 ' - 8 3 / 4 " LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2111' - 2 5/8" ROOF132' - 5 1/4" LEVEL 3122' - 5 1/4" PARKING88' - 10" 3 3 67 7 6 NUMBER DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.© 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / S t a l l a n d L i n o L a k e s / A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g 1 0 . 2 8 . 2 4 .r v t 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 2 : 4 3 P M AA-21 01/19/2021 APARTMENT ELEVATIONS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA WILKINSON WATERS 24-027 01/19/2021 Author Checker Checker 24-027 1/16" = 1'-0"1 STREET & GREENWAY ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 END ELEVATION @ PROPERTY LINE NO.REVISIONS DATE NUMBER DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.© 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / S t a l l a n d L i n o L a k e s / A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g 1 0 . 2 8 . 2 4 .r v t 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 2 : 4 6 P M AC-20 01/19/2021 CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA WILKINSON WATERS 24-027 01/19/2021 Author Checker Checker 24-027 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Elevation 6 - a A-PUD 1/8" = 1'-0"2 Elevation 7 - a A-PUD 1/8" = 1'-0"3 Elevation 8 - a A-PUD 1/8" = 1'-0"4 Elevation 9 - a A-PUD NO.REVISIONS DATE NUMBER DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.© 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / S t a l l a n d L i n o L a k e s / T o w n h o u s e M o d e l . r v t 2/ 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 2 4 : 2 7 P M AT-20 2/10/2025 TOWNHOUSE ELEVATION Enter address here TOWNHOMES Project Number 2/10/2025 Author Checker Checker Project Number 1/8" = 1'-0"1 END ELEVATION @ TOWN HOUSES 1/8" = 1'-0"2 STREET ELEVATION @ TOWNHOUSES 1/8" = 1'-0"3 GREENWAY ELEVATION @TOWNHOUSES NO.REVISIONS DATE BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB WILKINSON LAKE BLVD C E N T E R V I L L E R O A D C S A H NO. 32 OHLVOHL O H L O H L O H L V OH L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G G G G G G G G G G FBO FBO FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O FB O U G G OHL OHL OHL G GG OH L OH L OH L OH L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L O H L OH L OH L O H L O H L OH L O H L O H L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L U U G U UUGU G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL V G G ACACACEM LS >>> MB MB SW Corner Sec. 35-31-22 CIM S. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-31-22 W. L i n e - G o v ' t L o t 5 Se c . 3 5 - T 3 1 - R 2 2 E. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - T 3 1 - R 2 2 SE Corner Sec. 34-31-22 CIM S. Line Sec. 34-T31-R22 Easement per Doc. No. 252087 3 3 ' R o a d w a y E a s e m e n t N. Line - Gov't Lot 5 Sec. 35-T31-R22N. Line SE 1/4 - SE 1/4 Sec. 34-T31-R22 Eas e m e n t p e r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 33' Roadway Easement W W W W W W W W W W. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - T 3 1 - R 2 2 Approximate OHW Line from others 895.2 (NGVD29) 2 1/2" Brass Disc Flood Zone A per FEMA FIRM map Flood Zone A per FEMA FIRM map 66 66 USGS Brass Disc 659.97 N89°12'14"W 1063.34 N 1 8 ° 5 2 ' 4 2 " W 1 4 0 6 . 1 2 S89°19'02"E 617.78 S0 0 ° 2 4 ' 3 6 " E 1 3 2 3 . 1 1 N0 0 ° 2 0 ' 5 4 " W 1 2 5 3 . 8 2 N89°32'07"E 560.69 N53° 5 0 ' 1 7 " E 416. 3 5 Flood Zone A per FEMA FIRM map ASH STREET 19 . 3 2 107.75 1 6 5 . 5 4 128.39 6 1 . 7 5 L = 12 2.92 Δ =19 ° 0 2' 0 5 " 128.39 1 4 2 . 0 6 1 4 2 . 0 6 1 4 2 . 0 6 128.39 1 4 2 . 0 6 190.21 19 . 3 1 L =14 0.0 9 Δ = 18 °3 9 '58" 150.01 2 1 7 . 7 6 2 1 7 . 7 6 L=2.77 Δ=0°22'07" 1 5 9 . 3 0 150.00 1 6 2 . 0 6 1 6 2 . 0 6 150.00 1 6 2 . 0 6 1 6 2 . 0 6 159.47 6 3 . 7 5 9 9 . 0 2 1 4 2 . 0 6 128.39 1 4 2 . 0 6 1 6 0 . 7 4 L=1.33 Δ=0°15'13" 183.82 N70°39 ' 1 8 " E 16 3 . 8 8 1 4 2 . 0 6 128.39 1 4 2 . 0 6 S 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 4 2 " E 6 3 3 . 5 1 N 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 4 2 " W 6 4 4 . 1 6 304.5156.1 8 606.65 409.32 L=317.5 6 Δ=70°04'0 5 " 1 1 9 0 . 5 2 L = 8.4 6 Δ = 1° 4 0'58" 3 0 6 . 3 6 S 4 6 ° 5 3 ' 5 7 " E L=78.13 Δ=21°06'5 2" 172. 8 8S68 ° 0 0 ' 4 9 " E L=60.18 Δ=11°58'20" L = 1 6 1.5 0 Δ = 3 7 ° 0 0 '4 4 " L = 8 . 9 5 Δ = 2 ° 0 3 ' 0 1" L=11.06 Δ=2°06'45" 159.47 3 . 5 1 L = 1 8 6.8 7 Δ = 4 8 ° 4 0'0 7" 48.1 3 131. 7 9 L=106.13 Δ=21°06'52" 3 0 6 . 3 6 N 4 6 ° 5 3 ' 5 7 " W L=119.72 Δ =32°21'21"45.32 79.31 44 . 7 1 L = 11 7 . 9 4 Δ = 2 ° 0 0 ' 4 9 " 5 0 3 . 5 2 S 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 4 2 " E 3 6 9 . 2 0 S 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 4 2 " E L = 1 7 4 . 6 2 Δ = 1 3 ° 0 8 ' 5 0 " 9 6 . 5 1 S 3 8 ° 3 9 ' 2 7 " E 71.0 8 S64 ° 4 9 ' 5 3 " E 132.19 S84°31'17"E N89°41'16"E 301.05 2 8 1 . 2 0 S 4 6 ° 0 5 ' 5 8 " E 14 3 . 2 4 S1 0 ° 4 7 ' 5 7 " E 186.37S70°39 ' 1 8 " W 476.76 S89°18'07"E 1 0 4 . 3 0 S 4 6 ° 0 5 ' 5 8 " E N 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 4 2 " W 5 6 7 . 3 3 127.17 327. 1 3 71 . 6 6 20.22 9.9 5 10 9 . 2 7 13 4 . 7 4 1 2 3 . 7 4 66 . 1 2 72 . 5 3 56 . 4 2 42.31 79.9 5 38.40 96 . 9 2 6 5 . 1 8 4 6 . 9 2 75 . 0 6 64 . 5 8 N49 ° 5 4 ' 5 1 " E 216. 2 6 S70°31 ' 1 3 " W 320.65 N21°43'18"E 30.80 N 4 6 ° 0 5 ' 5 8 " W 3 8 5 . 5 0 N 1 0 ° 4 7 ' 5 7 " W 3 9 1 . 1 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 2 6 18,239 SQ FT 0.42 AC 18,239 SQ FT 0.42 AC 171,814 SQ FT 3.94 AC 3,702 SQ FT 0.08 AC 27,818 SQ FT 0.64 AC 24,608 SQ FT 0.56 AC 24,310 SQ FT 0.56 AC 24,310 SQ FT 0.56 AC 30,510 SQ FT 0.70 AC 18,239 SQ FT 0.42 AC 18,239 SQ FT 0.42 AC 22,744 SQ FT 0.52 AC 224,862 SQ FT 5.16 AC201,115 SQ FT 4.62 AC 198,004 SQ FT 4.55 AC OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT E OUTLOT D 405,180 SQ FT 9.30 AC 76 60 SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE W I L K I N S O N W A Y WI L K I N S O N W A Y W E T W E T WE T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WE T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WE T W E T W E T W E T WET WET WET W E T WE T WET CONSERVATION EASEMENT S89°13'30"E 209.34 N40°20'07"E 23.40 N72°01'26"E 32.69 N89°13'30"W 213.61 S02°29'48"E 37.62 351.52 PROPOSED SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT 10 10 10 10 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER N79°17'1 6 " W 473.00 S86°12'44"W 265.00 N 1 0 ° 4 7 ' 1 6 " W 3 2 5 . 0 0 N4 6 ° 0 5 ' 1 6 " W 37 3 . 0 0 N86°52'16"W ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT 15 15 30671 PPLAT DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET TITLE PROJECT PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : S : \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ S U R V E Y P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ 3 0 6 7 1 P P L A T . D W G S A V E D B Y : M A R K . S C H W A N Z THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. 2OF 1 - --/--/-- PROJ. NO XX-XX SHEET TITLE 300 PROJ. NO (no year) XX-XX LINO LAKES MN PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 SCALE IN FEET 100 200 --- --- --- WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PROPOSED ZONING: Base Residential Zoning:Base Commercial Zoning: R-4 SETBACKS PER ZONING:General Business Setbacks per Zoning From Street Right-of-way From Street Right-of-way Major Collector or arterial street - 40 feet Major Collector or arterial street - 40 feet Local or minor collector street - 30 feet Local or minor collector street - 30 feet Parking lot - 15 feet Parking lot - 15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Rear lot line Rear lot line Principal Building - 30 feet Principal Building - 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory building - 5 feet Accessory building - 5 feet Parking lot - 5 feet Parking lot - 10 feet Side lot line Side lot line Principal Building - 20 feet Principal Building - 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 10 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory Building - 5 feet Accessory Building - 10 feet Parking lot - 5 feet Parking lot - 10 feet Zero lot line - Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied to a common wall of multi-family dwelling units Building Height Flexibility: To be greater of 4 Stories or 55' from grade to mid-rake. BENCHMARK: Onsite benchmark is top nut fire hydrant located along the westerly side of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard approximately 154 feet south of the southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota - Elev = 919.06 feet. Offsite benchmark is MnDot Geodetic Monument OTTER MNDT RESET - Elev = 941.081 feet. FLOOD ZONE: The surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone A, according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27003C0365E, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015 and Flood Zone X, according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27003C0370E, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. NOTES: 1. This survey does not purport to show land ownership or all easements or encumbrances that affect the described property. 2. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are approximate, based on Gopher State One Call. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are based on visible surface identification, and/or drawings provided by utility companies contacted by the Gopher State One Call. Utility lines in street right-of-way are not necessarily complete. Private utility lines, may not be located per the Gopher State One Call, available record drawings were used in preparing the location of these lines. Excavations were not made during the process of this survey to locate underground utilities and/or structures. Additional underground utilities and/or structures may be encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Center for verification of utility type and field location, prior to excavation. 3. Survey work was completed on June 4, 2024. LS LEGEND > SAN I UE UTL MB EM GM F C E U T FO Bituminous Surface Concrete Surface Gravel Surface Sanitary Sewer Line Sanitary Line from others Storm Sewer Line Storm Line from others Water Line Water Line from others Forcemain line from others Wetland line from others Underground Gas Line Underground Electric Line Underground Utility Line Underground Fiber Optic Line Overhead Utility Line Landscaping Edge Field Edge Water's Edge Treeline Deciduous Tree Utility Marker Soil Boring Iron Monument Found Indicates Mag Nail Found Indicates Cast Iron Monument Found Indicates Concrete Stone "X" Found Electric Meter Utility Vault Gas Meter Ground Light Light Pole Transformer Utility Pedestal Utility Pole/Guy Wire Curb Stop Hydrant Water Valve Benchmark Cleanout Drop Intake Manhole/Catch Basin Lift Station Mailbox Post Sign Street Sign Coniferous Tree >> STM SANF WAT WET W OHL FBO G V I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO.2/10/25 45817 MARK A. SCHWANZ WILKINSON WATERS ADDITIONEXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (E1/2 SE1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, East of St. Paul Water Works, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That portion of Government Lot 5, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22 West, lying west of the Centerville Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The South 300 feet thereof, and except the North 170 feet of the South 470 feet of the East 870 feet thereof, that part of the West three-quarters of the South Half of the Southeast one-quarter (W 3/4 S 1/2 SE 1/4) Section 34, Township 31, Range 22 lying southeasterly of the presently existing Water Department right-of-way (meaning thereby the right-of-way easement for conduit purposes of the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners), Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section Thirty-four (34), Township Thirty-one (31) North, Range Twenty-two (22) West and also the South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34); and also, except the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet, all that part of the South Three Hundred (300) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of St. Paul Water Works right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying westerly of said right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter (SE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of the County Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. BASIS OF BEARING: The orientation of this bearing system is based on the east line of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Said line bears South 00 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East. AREA TABLE: OVERALL SITE = 3,303,390 sq. ft. - 75.835 acres EXISTING PROPERTY: ZONED: R (Rural) (Per City of Lino Lakes City Code and Zoning Ordinances) Setbacks Building Right of Way (Local or Minor Collector Street) = 30 feet Right of Way (Major Collector or Arterial Street) = 40 feet Rear (Principal Building) = 30 feet Rear (Accessory Building) = 30 feet Side (Principal Building) = 10 feet Side (Accessory Building) = 5 feet Parking Lots for non-residential uses: 15 feet from all lot lines Height Requirements Maximum Height = 40 feet (Except as allowed by City Code Section 1007.043(3) A0-16 Attachment 11. Preliminary Plat OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM STM STM OHLOHL OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL STM STM OHL OHL OHL STM STM STM STM STM STM MB MB MB S. Line Sec. 34-T31-R22 W. L i n e SE 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - 3 1 - 2 2 Eas e m e n t p e r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 Eas e m e n t p e r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 S 1/4 Corner Sec. 34-31-22 Found CIM W W W W. L i n e E 1 / 2 - S E 1 / 4 - S E 1 / 4 Se c . 3 4 - T 3 1 - R 2 2 Approximate OHW Line from others 895.2 (NGVD29) 66 N0 0 ° 2 0 ' 5 4 " W 1 2 5 3 . 8 2 1905.73 N89°26'17"E 2565.70 N53° 5 0 ' 1 7 " E 416. 3 5 L=55.70 R=124.82 Δ=25°34'00" N79°24'17"E 250.16 L =1 8 7 .7 8 R =3 8 4 .2 6 Δ =2 8 °0 0 '0 0 " N51° 2 4 ' 1 7 " E 1 5 2 7 . 2 4 1/2" Iron Pipe RLS 22440 Flood Zone A per FEMA FIRM map 47 0 30 0 870 S. Line Sec. 34-T31-R22 C.S.A.H NO. 32 (ASH STREET) 1/2" Iron Pipe RLS 16113 56.1 8 1,782,738 SQ FT 40.93 AC OUTLOT A W E T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET CONSERVATION EASEMENT S86°12'44"W 265.00N86°52'16"W 130.00 N6 3 ° 1 4 ' 1 6 " W 24 1 . 0 0 S89°31'44"W 652.00 S 2 2 ° 0 9 ' 0 2 " E 2 0 3 . 6 8 S 1 3 ° 3 8 ' 3 2 " E 3 6 1 . 4 1 15 15 25 25 25 2 5 ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT S64°36 ' 4 4 " W 120.00 S42°41 ' 4 4 " W 4 2 5 . 0 0 S40 ° 0 2 ' 1 8 " W 6 1 4 . 4 0 30671 PPLAT DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET TITLE PROJECT PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : S:\ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ S U R V E Y P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ 3 0 6 7 1 P P L A T . D W G S A V E D B Y : MA R K . S C H W A N Z THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. 2OF 1 - --/--/-- PROJ. NO XX-XX SHEET TITLE 300 PROJ. NO (no year) XX-XX LINO LAKES MN PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 SCALE IN FEET 100 200 --- --- --- WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC LS LEGEND > SAN I UE UTL MB EM GM F C E U T FO Bituminous Surface Concrete Surface Gravel Surface Sanitary Sewer Line Sanitary Line from others Storm Sewer Line Storm Line from others Water Line Water Line from others Forcemain line from others Wetland line from others Underground Gas Line Underground Electric Line Underground Utility Line Underground Fiber Optic Line Overhead Utility Line Landscaping Edge Field Edge Water's Edge Treeline Iron Monument Found Indicates Mag Nail Found Indicates Cast Iron Monument Found Indicates Concrete Stone "X" Found Electric Meter Utility Vault Gas Meter Ground Light Light Pole Transformer Utility Pedestal Utility Pole/Guy Wire Curb Stop Hydrant Water Valve Benchmark Cleanout Drop Intake Manhole/Catch Basin Lift Station Mailbox Post Sign Street Sign Coniferous Tree Deciduous Tree Utility Marker Soil Boring >> STM SANF WAT WET W OHL FBO G V I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO.2/10/25 45817 MARK A. SCHWANZ WILKINSON WATERS ADDITION A0-17 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 9 2 2 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OH L V OH L OHL OHL V OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G G G G G G G G G FB O FB O FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO U GG UTV UTV UTV FBO FB O G UTV OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL U U G U U U G U G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L V G G WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WET WET WET AM E L I <II <II <II <II <II <II <II II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WE T WET WET WET WET WE T WET I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EM LS Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > >> > > > > > > > > > 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY XX X X 5 11 X X X X X PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 W PR O P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924. 0 1 WILKI N S O N W A Y PROPOSED BASI N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 1.47 m p h Faste s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sout h L e g ( S o u t h ) West L e g ( W e s t ) North L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I IIIII I I I I I I I > > > >> > > > >>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I S-6 MH-18 MH-15 MH-16 MH-17 MH-19 MH-10 MH-12 MH-8 MH-7 MH-13 S-5 S-4 S-2 S-1 S-3S-3A ST-108 ST-2 ST-106A ST-106 ST-107 ST-105A ST-105 ST-104ST-102 ST-102A ST-101 ST-202 ST-202A ST-201 ST-203 ST-203A ST-205 ST-204 FES-1 FES-1A FES-201 FES-101 ST-116 ST-117 ST-113 ST-114A ST-114 ST-303 ST-302 ST-301 FES-301 ST-402 ST-106B ST-401 FES-401 ST-110 ST-111 ST-112 ST-213 ST-212 ST-211 ST-210 ST-206 ST-208 ST-209ST-207 FES-4 FES-4A ST-109 FES-109 FES-6A OCS-2 FES-6 ST-115 ST-302A ST-108A 30671 C3-UTILITY-OVERALL DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \ \ I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - U T I L I T Y - O V E R A L L . D W G S A V E D B Y : D A Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-20 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C3-20 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 300 30671 C3-20 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. C3-23 C3-21 C3-22 C3-24 Attachment 12. Overall Civil and Landscape Plans PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 32 X X X X X X X X PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 FO U UFO MB OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G G G G G FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO EX SB-aet U EX SB- EX SB- OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL U U G I=914.67 U OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L V >> G G G G G CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II >> >> >> > I I 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 X X X X X X X X X X X X BUILDING A FFE = 934 LFE = 923 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 927 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 P- 3 ( 5 2 ) 7 2 ' x 1 5 " @ 3 . 0 0 % P-3 0 3 9 0 ' x 1 5 " @ 0 . 2 5 % I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II >> >> >> > I I ST-105A R=923.03 I=916.48 ST-105 R=923.02 I=915.84 ST-104 R=921.56 I=913.92ST-102 R=921.37 I=913.03 ST-102A R=921.61 I=913.54 ST-202 R=917.95 I=904.68 ST-203 R=915.00 I=906.75 ST-205 R=911.68 I=907.58 ST-202A R=917.95 I=907.26 ST-203A R=914.98 I=909.12 P-104 1 3 7 ' x 2 4 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-103 55'x 24" @ 1.25% P-105A 45'x 18" @ 1.00% P-102A 32'x 24" @ 1.00% P-2 0 5 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 2 5 % P-204 145'x 3 0 " @ 0 . 2 5 %P-203 162'x 30" @ 0.15% P- 2 0 2 A 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % P- 2 0 3 A 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 1 . 0 0 % SP - 1 4 A 4 6 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % MH-13 R=932.49 I=917.77 MH-12 R=926.25 I=913.96 S P - 1 1 8 0 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-10 R=926.49 I=911.97 SP - 1 5 6 9 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % SP-9 1 6 3 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-8 R=924.42 I=909.31 S P - 8 9 2 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-7 R=923.05 I=907.73 SP - 7 9 8 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-15 R=925.33 I=910.91 S P - 1 6 1 0 0 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % MH-16 R=926.52 I=913.11 S P - 1 7 1 0 0 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % MH-17 R=928.73 I=915.31 MH-18 R=932.16 I=917.29 SP - 1 8 8 9 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % SP-19 61'x 8" @ 2.00%MH-19 R=931.94 I=918.72 SP - 1 9 A 5 6 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % SP-12 241'x 8" @ 1.50% SP - 5 A 3 6 ' x 6 " @ 2 . 0 0 % SP-5 1 4 6 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % SP-6A 70'x 6" @ 2.00% S-4 R=921.70 I=905.78 S-3A R=913.01 I=903.43 SP-3 89'x 8" @ 0.65 % S-2 R=920.90 I=900.77 SP-2 313'x 8" @ 0.60% SP-4 393'x 8" @ 1.25% 10 ' 1.47 m p h Fast e s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) Wes t L e g ( W e s t ) Nort h L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t ST-213 R=922.98 I=918.75 P-213 349'x 12" @ 0.50% ST-212 R=920.95 I=916.80 P-212 113'x 15 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-211 R=923.87 I=916.03 P-21 1 3 0 0 ' x 1 8 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-210 R=924.68 I=914.34 P-2 1 0 2 9 6 ' x 2 1 " @ 2 . 0 4 % ST-206 R=912.00 I=908.10 P-207 153'x 18" @ 2.00% ST-207 R=917.06 I=911.35 P-208 142'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-208 R=919.55 I=912.26 P-209 142'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-209 R=922.04 I=913.17 ST-110 R=924.25 I=913.79 P- 1 1 0 3 0 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % ST-111 R=925.04 I=914.19 P-1 1 1 4 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % P-1 1 2 7 1 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-112 R=926.24 I=914.71 P - 1 1 3 1 4 2 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-113 R=925.48 I=915.65 P-114 100'x 24" @ 0.50% ST-114 R=928.48 I=916.35 P- 1 1 5 1 1 4 ' x 1 5 " @ 1 . 1 7 % P-1 1 4 A 8 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-114A R=926.50 I=917.00P-116 72'x 15" @ 1.02% ST-115 R=928.23 I=920.46ST-116 R=930.01 I=921.94 P- 1 1 7 1 7 ' x 1 2 " @ 1 . 0 0 % ST-117 R=929.48 I=921.40 ST-302A R=924.47 I=922.00 P- 3 0 2 A 8 1 ' x 1 2 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-302 R=925.68 I=921.40 P- 3 0 2 8 0 ' x 1 8 " @ 0 . 2 5 % ST-301 R=924.89 I=921.00 P - 3 0 1 8 9 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 1 3 % FES-301 I=920.00 ST-106B R=920.00 I=916.85 P-106B 34'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-402 R=923.69 I=919.16 P-402 33'x 18" @ 0.25% ST-401 R=923.32 I=918.58P-401 32'x 18" @ 0.25% FES-401 I=919.00 ST-102B R=920.00 I=914.09 P-102B 35'x 24" @ 1.00% ST-303 R=927.10 I=921.82 P - 3 ( 5 3 ) 7 7 ' x 1 5 " @ 2 . 0 0 % ST-3 (72) R=928.90 I=923.55 P-2 0 6 1 2 8 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 2 5 % ST-3 (73) R=932.99 I=925.92 S-3 R=915.35 I=902.75 STUB-104A I=914.17 (18") 30671 C3-UTILITY DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - U T I L I T Y . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-21 UTILITY PLAN C3-21 UTILITY PLAN 300 30671 C3-21 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >> <II II> I I G G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO CONSTRUCT SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES TO WITHIN 5' OF BUILDING - CONTINUATION TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCT SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES TO WITHIN 5' OF BUILDING - CONTINUATION TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR 8"x45° PVC BEND 8"x45° PVC BEND 8"x6" PVC TEE 8"x45° PVC BEND 8"x8" PVC TEE 8"x6" PVC TEE 8" P V C W A T E R M A I N 8" P V C W A T E R M A I N 8"x45° PVC BEND 8" PVC WATERMAIN 8"x45° PVC BEND 8"x8" PVC TEE 8" PVC WATERMAIN 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12" PVC WATERMAIN 8"x8" PVC TEE 8"x6" PVC TEE 6"x45° PVC BEND 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=930.72 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=930.52 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=931.07 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=923.39 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=919.17 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=913.52 8"x6" PVC TEE 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=926.17 EX 24" CMP CULVERT 6" SAN STUB 4" WATER SERVICE 6" SAN STUB RETAINING WALL 1" WATER SERVICE (TYP)4" SANITARY SERVICE (TYP) FDC CONNECTION FDC CONNECTION 12"x8" CROSS 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 1 - 6" GV 12" PVC WATERMAIN 12"X8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X X X X X X PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 934.52 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 929.58 POSE D B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 U U FO FO U FO OH L V OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL V OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G FB O FBO FB O FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO EX GGV G G G G G UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV FBO FBO FBO FB O FB O UE GGG UTV UTV UTV FBO G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I T/C=921.43 EX CB I=909.79 (30" RCP) W I=909.75 (30" RCP) E T/C=923.58 EX CB I=910.19 (30" RCP) W I=910.16 (30" RCP) E R=928.61 EX STM MH I=912.23 (12" RCP) E SANITARY I=912.21 (12" RCP) W SANITARY I=922.41 (12" RCP) N STORM I=921.46 (12" RCP) S STORM T/C=930.39 EX CB I=926.88 (12" RCP) E T/C=931.33 EX CB I=915.19 (30" RCP) W I=915.29 (30" RCP) S R=931.93 EX STM MH I=925.08 (12" RCP) S STORM I=924.92 (12" RCP) N STORM I=914.21 (12" RCP) E SANITARY I=914.12 (12" RCP) W SANITARY T/C=923.68 EX CB I=919.33 (12" RCP) S R=930.71 EX SAN MH I=918.46 (UNKNOWN" UNKNOWN) SW HARD TO SEE PIPE SEEMED LIKE AT LEAST A 12 I=918.26 (?" UNKNOWN) NE BIG? I=919.46 (UNKNOWN" PVC) W 8 OR 10 I=924.01 (8" PVC) W Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > > > > I > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I > > > > > >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> X X X X X X 11 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 WILK I N S O N W A Y P-3 0 3 9 0 ' x 1 5 " @ 0 . 2 5 % I > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I > > > > > >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ST-2 R=927.13 I=921.00 ST-108 R=929.54 I=923.50 ST-106 R=925.24 I=918.83 ST-106A R=926.56 I=919.48 ST-107 R=927.34 I=921.42 ST-105A R=923.03 I=916.48 ST-105 R=923.02 I=915.84 ST-104 R=921.56 I=913.92ST-102 R=921.37 I=913.03 ST-102A R=921.61 I=913.54 P-10 5 2 2 4 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-104 1 3 7 ' x 2 4 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-103 55'x 24" @ 1.25% P-106A 45'x 15" @ 1.00% P-105A 45'x 18" @ 1.00% P-108 1 6 6 ' x 1 5 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-107 1 9 2 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-2 31'x 1 2 " @ 3 . 2 6 % SP - 1 5 6 9 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % S P - 8 9 2 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-7 R=923.05 I=907.73 SP - 7 9 8 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % SP - 5 A 3 6 ' x 6 " @ 2 . 0 0 % STUB-5A I=908.92 S-5 R=923.01 I=907.70 SP-6 1 7 6 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % SP-5 1 4 6 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % SP-6A 70'x 6" @ 2.00% S-6 R=924.80 I=909.99 STUB-6A I=911.90 S-4 R=921.70 I=905.78 8" CAP I=919.14 SP-1 96 ' x 8 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-213 R=922.98 I=918.75 ST-302A R=924.47 I=922.00 P- 3 0 2 A 8 1 ' x 1 2 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-302 R=925.68 I=921.40 P- 3 0 2 8 0 ' x 1 8 " @ 0 . 2 5 % ST-301 R=924.89 I=921.00 P - 3 0 1 8 9 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 1 3 % FES-301 I=920.00 ST-106B R=920.00 I=916.85 P-106B 34'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-402 R=923.69 I=919.16 P-402 33'x 18" @ 0.25% ST-401 R=923.32 I=918.58 ST-108A R=925.85 I=923.93 P - 1 0 8 A 4 5 ' x 1 2 " @ 0 . 5 0 % STUB-104A I=914.17 (18") 30671 C3-UTILITY DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - U T I L I T Y . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-22 UTILITY PLAN C3-22 UTILITY PLAN 300 30671 C3-22 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >> <II II> I I G G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN 12" 45° BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER (VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH, AND LOCATION) 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 12" PV C W A T E R M A I N 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK= 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK= 8"x8" PVC TEE 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV FUTURE INTERCONNECT VAULT FOR CONNECTION BETWEEN WHITE BREAR TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. VAULT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH DEVELOPMENT, BUT APPURTENCES WILL BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS IN THE FUTURE FUTURE STORM BY OTHERS (TYP) 12"X12" TEE 2 - 12" GV 12" 45° BEND CAP 12" WATERMAIN STUB >> OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL I=901.82 I=901.80 U G U G U OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L X AS H S T R E E W W W W W W <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I> > > R=912.44 I=896.35 EX SAN MH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I IIIIIIIIIII I I II > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WILKINSON WAY BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L1 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 916.6 L2 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.9 L3 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.7 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I IIIIIIIIIII I I II > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ST-202 R=917.95 I=904.68 ST-201 W/ SAFL BAFFLE SEE DETAIL SHEET C0-26 R=915.91 I=903.24 S=899.24 ST-203 R=915.00 I=906.75 ST-205 R=911.68 I=907.58 ST-204 R=911.68 I=907.31 FES-1 I=909.22 FES-1A I=908.98 FES-201 I=905.66 ST-202A R=917.95 I=907.26 ST-203A R=914.98 I=909.12 P-2 0 5 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 2 5 % P-204 145'x 3 0 " @ 0 . 2 5 % P-203 162'x 30" @ 0.15% P- 2 0 2 1 6 5 ' x 3 6 " @ 0 . 1 5 % P-2 0 1 1 3 1 ' x 3 6 " @ 0 . 1 5 % P- 2 0 2 A 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % P- 2 0 3 A 2 9 ' x 2 4 " @ 1 . 0 0 % P-1 9 6 ' x 1 2 " @ 0 . 2 5 % 11 8 0 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-10 R=926.49 I=911.97 S-3A R=913.01 I=903.43 SP-3 89'x 8" @ 0.65 % S-2 R=920.90 I=900.77 SP-2 313'x 8" @ 0.60% SP - 1 1 8 3 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % S-1 R=917.94 I=898.38 SP-1A 70'x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB I=897.40 10 ' ST-206 R=912.00 I=908.10 P-207 153'x 18" @ 2.00% ST-207 R=917.06 I=911.35 P-208 142'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-208 R=919.55 I=912.26 P-209 142'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-209 R=922.04 I=913.17 ST-110 R=924.25 I=913.79 P- 1 1 0 3 0 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % ST-111 R=925.04 I=914.19 P-1 1 1 4 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % P-1 1 2 7 1 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % P- 1 0 9 9 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % FES-109 I=902.00 FES-4A I=904.50 FES-4 I=904.66 P-4 66'x 3 6 " @ 0 . 2 5 % P-2 0 6 1 2 8 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 2 5 % SP-3B 22'x 8" @ 0.65% STUB-3B I=904.09 S-3B R=915.72 I=903.85 S-3 R=915.35 I=902.75 30671 C3-UTILITY DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - U T I L I T Y . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-23 UTILITY PLAN C3-23 UTILITY PLAN 300 30671 C3-23 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >> <II II> I I G G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING 8" WATERLINE 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=923.39 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=919.17 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=913.52 RETAINING WALL 1" WATER SERVICE (TYP)4" SANITARY SERVICE (TYP) SANITARY SEWER CAP 12"x8" CROSS 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 1 - 6" GV 12" PLUG 8" 45° BEND 8" 22.5° BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB 1 - 8" GV 8" 22.5° BEND 8" PVC WATERMAIN 12" PVC WATERMAIN 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 2 . 1 6 PROP O S E D B U I L D I N G FFE = 925 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 R=911.71 I=894.95? EX SAN MH R=919.88 I=893.60? EX OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D W W W W W W W W W W W W <II <II <II <II <II <II I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EM LS T/C=916.54 EX CB I=907.08 (30" RCP) S I=907.03 (30" RCP) NE T/C=919.33 EX CB I=908.50 (30" RCP) SW I=908.49 (30" RCP) E I=910.19 (18" RCP) S T/C=921.43 EX CB I=909.79 (30" RCP) W I=909.75 (30" RCP) E I=900.58 (30" RCP) W I THINK 30 I=900.88 (30" RCP) E I THINK 30 T/C=919.55 EX CB I=914.75 (12" RCP) S T/C=923.68 EX CB I=919.33 (12" RCP) S >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > R=912.44 I=896.35 EX SAN MH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> I IIIIIII > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I WILKINSON WAY 5 TOWNHOUSE 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924 . 0 1 PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> I IIIIIII > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I ST-106 R=925.24 I=918.83 ST-105A R=923.03 I=916.48 ST-105 R=923.02 I=915.84 ST-104 R=921.56 I=913.92ST-102 R=921.37 I=913.03 ST-102A R=921.61 I=913.54 ST-101 W/ SAFL BAFFLE SEE DETAIL SHEET C0-26 R=917.15 I=905.41 SUMP=901.41 FES-201 I=905.66 FES-101 I=902.00 P-10 5 2 2 4 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-104 1 3 7 ' x 2 4 " @ 1 . 2 5 % P-103 55'x 24" @ 1.25% P-105A 45'x 18" @ 1.00% P-102A 32'x 24" @ 1.00% P- 1 0 2 1 3 6 ' x 3 0 " @ 4 . 5 0 % P- 1 0 1 1 3 2 ' x 3 0 " @ 2 . 5 8 % P-107 1 9 2 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % 11 8 0 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-10 R=926.49 I=911.97 SP - 1 5 6 9 ' x 8 " @ 2 . 0 0 % SP-9 1 6 3 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-8 R=924.42 I=909.31 S P - 8 9 2 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-7 R=923.05 I=907.73 SP - 7 9 8 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 5 0 % MH-15 R=925.33 I=910.91 S P - 5 A 3 6 ' x 6 " @ 2 . 0 0 % STUB-5A I=908.92 S-5 R=923.01 I=907.70 SP-6 1 7 6 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % SP-5 1 4 6 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % SP-6A 70'x 6" @ 2.00% S-6 R=924.80 I=909.99 S-4 R=921.70 I=905.78 SP-4 393'x 8" @ 1.25% SP - 1 1 8 3 ' x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % S-1 R=917.94 I=898.38 SP-1A 70'x 8 " @ 1 . 2 5 % CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB I=897.40 10 ' P-209 142'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-209 R=922.04 I=913.17 ST-110 R=924.25 I=913.79 P- 1 1 0 3 0 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % ST-111 R=925.04 I=914.19 P-1 1 1 4 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % P-1 1 2 7 1 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 5 0 % ST-112 R=926.24 I=914.71 P- 3 0 2 8 0 ' x 1 8 " @ 0 ST-301 R=924.89 I=921.00 P - 3 0 1 8 9 ' x 1 8 " @ 1 . 1 3 % FES-301 I=920.00 ST-106B R=920.00 I=916.85 P-106B 34'x 18" @ 0.50% ST-402 R=923.69 I=919.16 P-402 33'x 18" @ 0.25% ST-401 R=923.32 I=918.58P-401 32'x 18" @ 0.25% FES-401 I=919.00 ST-102B R=920.00 I=914.09 P-102B 35'x 24" @ 1.00% ST-109 W/ SAFL BAFFLE SEE DETAIL SHEET C0-26 R=920.60 I=902.45 SUMP=898.45 P- 1 0 9 9 0 ' x 2 4 " @ 2 . 0 0 % FES-109 I=902.00 FES-4A I=904.50 FES-4 I=904.66 P-4 66'x 3 6 " @ 0 . 2 5 % FES-6A I=902.50 P-6 A 3 3 ' x 2 4 " @ 0 . 0 0 % OCS-2 R=908.00 I=901.00 P-6 3 3 ' x 3 0 " @ 0 . 9 2 % FES-6 I=900.70 STUB-104A I=914.17 (18") STUB-101A I=905.67 (18") 30671 C3-UTILITY DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 3 - U T I L I T Y . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C3-24 UTILITY PLAN C3-24 UTILITY PLAN 300 30671 C3-24 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >> <II II> I I G G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING 8" WATERLINE EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING 8" WATERLINE 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=923.39 1" WATER SERVICE (TYP)4" SANITARY (TYP) 12"x6" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 6" GV 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV 5"x 7'-6" HYDRANT BREAK=8"x8" PVC TEE 12"x8" TEE 1 - 12" GV 1 - 8" GV PROPOSED STORMWATER RE-USE IRRIGATION WELLCONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB 1 - 8" GV8" PVC WATERMAIN 12" PVC WATERMAIN 8" WATER SERVICE STUB 8" WATER SERVICE PLUG 6" WATER SERVICE PLUG 8" WATER SERVICE STUB 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922. 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY XX X X 5 11 X X X X X PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 W PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924 . 0 1 WILKIN S O N W A Y PROPOSED BASIN 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB OH L V OH L OHL OHL V OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G G G G G G G G G FB O FB O FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX GGV GG UTV UTV UTV FBO FB O G UTV OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL EX SB-st-13 U U G U U U G U G U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L V G G WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W E T WET WET WET WET WET <II <II <II <II <II II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WET WE T WET WET WET WET WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EM LS Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > >> > > > > > > > > > 900 898 902 904 906 908 920 918 922 924 910 902 904 906 908 9 2 0918 926 928 930 924 926 928 9 1 2 9 2 2 9 2 4 924 924 92 2 91 6 91 8 1.47 m p h Faste s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sout h L e g ( S o u t h ) West L e g ( W e s t ) North L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I IIIII I I I I I I I > > > >> > > > >>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I 920914916918922 924 900 910 896898 902904906 908 91291 2912 920914 916 918 922 92 2 924 924 92 0 92 2 92 4 92 6 900 91 0 896 8 9 8 8 9 8 902 906 902 91 0 916 918 932 910 904900898 902 908 908 906 910906908912 914 9 1 0 91 6 92 0 92 2 9 2 4 92 0 916 924 922 924 9 2 6 92 8 924926926 922 920 924 920 926 91 4 92 0 92 6 920 922 924 926 920 916 922 924 924 30671 C4-GRADING-OVERALL DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G - O V E R A L L . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-10 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET ##### DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) C4-13 C4-11 C4-12 C4-14 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 X X X X X X X X X X X X BUILDING A FFE = 934 LFE = 923 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 927 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 FO U UFO MB OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G G G G G FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO U OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL U U G U OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L V >> G G G G G CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 0 0 0 2 CO U N T Y O F A N O K A 61 0 1 C E N T E R V I L L E R D 35 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 4 BIRC H E R A L E C 1613 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 8 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 5 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 32 X X X X X X X X PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II >> >> >> > I I 1.47 m p h Fast e s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) Wes t L e g ( W e s t ) Nort h L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t ST-105A T/C=923.03 ST-105 T/C=923.02 ST-104 R=921.56 ST-102 T/C=921.37 ST-102A T/C=921.61 ST-202 T/C=917.95 ST-202A T/C=917.95 ST-203 T/C=915.00 ST-203A T/C=914.98 MH-13 R=932.49 MH-18 R=932.16 MH-19 R=931.94 MH-17 R=928.73 MH-10 R=926.49 MH-16 R=926.52 MH-15 R=925.33 MH-12 R=926.25 MH-8 R=924.42 MH-7 R=923.05 S-5 R=923.01 S-4 R=921.70 S-2 R=920.90S-3 R=915.35 S-3A R=913.01 922 923 924 9 2 0 91 7 918 91 9 925 926 927 928 9 2 9 9 2 1 9 2 2 925 9 2 3 9 2 4 925 925 924 924 9 2 1 92 2 92 3 91 5 91 6 91 7 91 8 9 1 9 922 923 915 920 913 914 91 6 91 7 9 1 8 919 921 922 923 922 930 928 929 915 913 914 917 920 921 923 92 0 93 0 930 916 91 6 91 8 92 2 92 292 2 92 4 92 4 92 4 92 6 92 6 92 6 92 8 92 8 92 8 93 2 93 2 930 928 928 929 931 932 927 92 5 923 924 926 925 923 924 925 922 923 924 920 921 922 923 920 917 918 919 921 91 5 91 4 91 6 91 7 91 8 920919 921 922 924 926 925 922 922 923 923 924 926 93 0 920918 919 921 922 923 -2.7% -3.2% -3 . 2 % -4 . 3 % -1. 4 % -1. 5 % -1.3 % -2.4 % -2.8% -3 . 9 % - 5 . 3 % -2. 9 % -3 . 0 % -8 . 2 % -4.7% -9.0% -8 . 7 % -0 . 9 % -1.5% -1 . 5 % -25.0% -2 5 . 0 % -1 6 . 9 % -2 0 . 9 % -15.5% -15.5% -27.2% -2 . 3 % -31.4% -2 2 . 7 % -1 6 . 6 % - 1 4 . 3 % -2.7% -1.9% -11 . 4 % -2 0 . 1 % -0 . 4 % -8.5% -6.5% -2 . 0 % -9 . 1 % -1 1 . 3 % -1 1 . 4 % -1 3 . 6 % -5 . 3 % -24.8% -0.9% -0.4% 922.95 927.05 931.19 9 3 2 . 1 3 93 0 . 7 5 930.35 930. 8 4 930. 8 3929.40 925.46 927.42 929.88 930.43 931.99 929.99 930.40 930.19 930.19 929. 9 7 929. 4 7 929.9 5 930.50 930.95 929.65 933.38 933.61 93 3 . 7 5 933.50 930.74 930.51 929.49 929.42 928.00 931.7 6 92 8 . 0 0 9 2 6 . 7 8 9 2 7 . 0 4 927.40 926.89 927.65 927.5 0 928.94 928.64 931.42 930.62 929.98 928.78 929.38 933. 3 0 931.64 928.98 929. 2 4 929.96 930.50 930. 7 3 931 . 1 1 930.62 929.86 929.25 930.6 3 930.5 1 9 2 9 . 9 4 932.26 929.3 5 92 9 . 0 4 930.81930. 4 5 930 . 3 8 932.98 932.22 93 2 . 6 8 932.21 931.63 931.64 931.3 5 93 1 . 0 5 930.9 6 9 3 1 . 4 6 929 . 0 3 930.47 930.24 933.67 932.35 933.27 933.34 932.68 928 . 9 6 930.15 9 2 3 . 5 0 928.00 92 8 . 0 0 925.38 925.38 928.00928.0 0 925.06925 . 0 6 928.00928.00 9 3 4 . 0 0 9 3 4 . 0 0 932.7 5 93 4 . 0 0 93 4 . 0 0 928.00 926.94 922.00 926.56 929.41 9 2 9 . 4 1 923.95 9 2 8 . 3 2 92 8 . 4 0 9 2 8 . 7 4 928.53 928.00 928.00 928.00 928.00 92 8 . 0 0 927 . 7 9 925.52 9 2 7 . 8 4 92 8 . 0 0 932.59 932.75 93 4 . 0 0 933 . 9 5 934.00 934.00 928 . 5 5 927 . 9 8 927.61 928.6 2927. 8 8 927.80 926.76 926.84 9 2 7 . 4 0 928 . 0 0 918. 6 6 918. 6 3 918 . 6 5 921 . 1 3 918 . 1 6 921. 1 4 920 . 6 4 923 . 6 1 923 . 6 2 923 . 1 3 925 . 3 5 925 . 3 5 924 . 8 6 925 . 3 6 925. 3 6 924 . 2 9 925 . 3 6 925 . 3 6 925 . 3 6 925 . 3 6 923 . 6 3 921 . 1 4 923 . 6 3 921 . 1 4 918 . 6 6 9 2 6 . 0 1 92 6 . 1 9 925 . 8 0 925.5 3 926.03 925.72 932.30 929.33929.97 931.50 925.94 926.62 926.11 926.12 925.78 925.37 925.00 924.61 923.32 923.04 924.07 T / W 924.00 T / W 923.00 T / W 917.00 920.00 922.07 923.86 T / W 930.40 T / W 928.79 T / W 925.08 T / W 920.77 926.79 927.40 920.60 928.73 92 2 . 9 8 920.95 912 . 0 0 9 2 7 . 3 0 9 2 8 . 5 7 926 . 0 6 92 7 . 6 4 930. 3 9 925.99 927.6 6 926.98 924.96 9 2 5 . 5 3 9 2 5 . 8 2 926.63 923. 0 0 926.36 926.33 92 6 . 8 6 9 2 6 . 8 8 926.8 3 927. 0 0 927 . 0 0 92 7 . 0 0 92 7 . 0 0 927.00 926.9 2 927.04 926.9 2 92 6 . 9 2 926.52 926.47 927.18 926 . 9 6 926 . 8 2 926.84 926.5 8 926 . 4 5 926 . 8 3 92 5 . 7 2 92 5 . 5 8 931. 7 4 T / W 928.7 9 B / W 932. 4 0 T / W 930.1 8 B / W 93 1 . 5 9 T / W 9 3 0 . 0 9 B / W 93 1 . 7 4 T / W 9 2 8 . 9 1 B / W 93 3 . 8 0 T / W 9 3 3 . 3 0 B / W 931. 7 4 T / W 928. 8 6 B / W 932. 4 5 T / W 930. 5 7 B / W 93 3 . 9 0 T / W 93 3 . 4 0 B / W 9 3 1 . 7 4 T / W 9 2 8 . 8 6 B / W 928. 2 4 T / W 927. 7 4 B / W 929 . 0 0 T / W 923 . 0 0 B / W 929.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 928.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 92 8 . 0 0 T / W 92 3 . 0 0 B / W 93 2 . 5 0 T / W 92 3 . 0 0 B / W 933.0 0 T / W 923. 0 0 B / W 928.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 923 . 3 9 923 . 4 9 923.65 923 . 3 0 923 . 0 5 922 . 8 7 922.44 923 92 9 9 2 5 9 2 6 92 7 92 8 928.51 929. 6 1 929 . 4 0 927.94 930.08930.08 930.08 930.08 929.20 929.20 927.79 922 92 4 30671 C4-GRADING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-11 GRADING PLAN C4-11 GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-11 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. 101 100 101 100 XXX X . X X XXX . X X XXX . X X XX X . X X T / W XX X . X X B / W -X.X% 3' WIDE CURB CUT 3' WIDE CURB CUT X X X X X X 11 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 WILK I N S O N W A Y U U FO FO U FO OH L V OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL V OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G FB O FBO FB O FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO EX SB- EX GGV G G G G G UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV UTV FBO FBO FBO FB O FB O UE GGG UTV UTV UTV FBO G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > > > > OM E S O F N O R T H O A K S I N C 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X X X X X X PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 934.52 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 929.58 POSE D B U I L D I N G PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 I > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I > > > > > >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ST-108 T/C=929.54 ST-2 R=927.13 ST-106A T/C=926.56 ST-106 T/C=925.24 ST-107 T/C=927.34 ST-105A T/C=923.03 ST-105 T/C=923.02 ST-104 R=921.56 S-6 R=924.80 MH-7 R=923.05 S-5 R=923.01 S-4 R=921.70 922 923 924 926 927 928 9 2 9 925 930 924 926 927 928 929 931 925 925 924 924 92 1 921 92 2 92 2 92 3 924 925 924 926 927 928 922 923 92 0 92 5 9 2 1 92 2 9 2 3 9 2 4 92 6 920 920920 91 9 921 922 92 5 92 3 92 4 92 6 927 92 8 92 9 9 2 992 9 930 928 929 92 5 923 924 926 931931 931 932 932932 933934 -8 . 7 % -0 . 9 % -1 . 5 % -2 5 . 0 % -2 0 . 1 % -0 . 4 % -8.5% -6.5% -2 . 0 % -24.8% -1.1% -1.0% -0.9% -1.1% -1.1 % -1.1 % -0.9% -0.4% 2 . 3 % 9 2 3 . 5 0 926.94 922.00 926.56 929.41 9 2 9 . 4 1 923.95 9 2 8 . 3 2 92 8 . 4 0 9 2 8 . 7 4 928.53 ??? ??? 926.62 926.11 926.12 925.78 925.37 925.00 923.32 923.04 92 2 . 9 8 923. 0 0 926.33 926.8 3 9 2 5 . 9 3 9 2 6 . 2 9 9 2 5 . 5 3 9 2 5 . 3 3 926.91 927. 6 0 928.90 929.34 927.90 923 . 3 9 923 . 4 9 923.65 923 . 3 0 923 . 0 5 922 . 8 7 922.44 921 . 8 0 921 . 9 6 921.56 921.91 9 2 1 . 4 7 9 2 1 . 2 3 9 2 1 . 5 2 9 2 1 . 3 8 9 2 2 . 5 8 9 2 2 . 4 7 922. 5 9 922 . 6 7 922.19 921.71 9 2 2 . 0 7 9 2 1 . 9 8 9 2 2 . 2 6 9 2 1 . 9 6 925 921 921 922 922 923 923 924 92 292 392 4 9 2 0 9 2 1 92 2 9 2 3 9 2 4 92 2 923 922 923 9 2 5 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 914.00 924.50 925.00 925.00 924.50 924.50 924.5 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 930 928 929 926 927 928 93 092 9 93 1 9 3 2 9 3 0 9 2 9 9 3 1 9 3 2 93 0 92 9 92 9 93 1 93 2 93 3 93 4 93 4 930 928 929 931 926 927 928 928 92 9 930 9 3 0 9 3 0 93 1 93 2 9 3 3 93 3 93 3 93 4 9 2 5 9 2 6 92 7 92 8 9 3 0 929 93 1 93 2 9 3 3 928 928.51 933.95 934.32 934 . 3 2 9 3 3 . 5 1 934.09 933.87 933.57 934.04 929. 6 1 929 . 4 0 927.94 930.08930.08 930.08 930.08 929.20 929.20 928. 8 6 92 8 . 8 6 92 8 . 7 0 928.64 928. 7 0 928.65 92 8 . 8 0 92 8 . 8 9 928. 8 6 93 1 . 5 4 93 2 . 7 9 92 9 . 1 0 9 2 8 . 1 4 9 2 7 . 3 3 93 1 . 9 8 928.3 9 928.9 3 929.1 0 928.8 0 932 . 0 2 931 . 9 8 934 . 0 1 934 . 0 2 93 3 . 4 8 92 8 . 7 8 92 8 . 7 1 92 9 . 2 0 92 9 . 3 0 933.4 2 933.3 0 932.9 4 932.9 8 928.8 8 928.9 1 928.6 1 928.6 4 9 2 7 . 5 4 93 1 . 8 6 932.2 6 933.2 2 932 . 4 3 928 . 9 2 928.85 929.58 92 9 . 5 8 9 2 9 . 5 8 929.5 8 929.53 929. 4 1 928. 7 4 929. 0 3 927.79 928.50 928.5 0 93 4 . 5 2 934.5 2 934.52 934.52 934.52 934.52 93 4 . 5 2 934.5 2 934.5 2 922 92 4 30671 C4-GRADING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-12 GRADING PLAN C4-12 GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-12 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. 101 100 101 100 XXX X . X X XXX . X X XXX . X X XX X . X X T / W XX X . X X B / W -X.X% WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) WILKINSON WAY BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L1 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 916.6 L2 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.9 L3 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.7 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- >> OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL U G U G U OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L X AS H S T R E E W W W W W W <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 0 0 0 8 WO O D S T R O M , J E R R Y A 15 9 1 A S H S T . 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 1 - 0 0 0 1 SAG D A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1601 A S H S T 35-3 1 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 > > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I IIIIIIIIIII I I II > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ST-202 T/C=917.95 ST-202A T/C=917.95 ST-201 R=915.91 ST-203 T/C=915.00 ST-203A T/C=914.98 ST-205 T/C=911.68 ST-204 T/C=911.68 FES-1 R=910.53 FES-1A R=910.29 FES-201 R=909.14 MH-10 R=926.49 S-2 R=920.90 S-1 R=917.94 S-3 R=915.35 S-3A R=913.01 905 910 902 903 904 906 907 908 909 9 1 1 9 1 2 9 1 3 9 2 1 92 2 92 3 91 5 91 6 91 7 91 8 9 1 9 915 920 913 914 91 6 91 7 9 1 8 919 921 922 923 915 913 914 916 917 918 920 921 923 924 91 0 90 9 91 1 910 911 915 906909912 918 906906 906 909 909 909 909 9 0 9 915 906 909 912 918 921 903 906 909 925 922 923 924 920 921 922 923 920 917 918 919 921 91 5 91 4 91 6 91 7 91 8 920919 921 922 924 -9.0% -1 6 . 9 % -2 0 . 9 % -15.5% -9 . 1 % -1 1 . 3 % -1 1 . 4 % -1 3 . 6 % -5 . 3 % -1 3 . 6 % -2 3 . 9 % -2 5 . 8 % -33 . 2 % -2 4 . 1 % -1 0 . 0 % -1 6 . 3 % -1 6 . 1 % -6 . 3 % -1 6 . 9 % -7 . 0 % -5 . 6 % -6 . 3 % -6 . 7 % -16.2% -27.1% 900 901 902 900 905 898 899 901 902 903 904 900 896 897 898 899 927 . 7 9 925.52 9 2 7 . 8 4 92 8 . 0 0 932.75 93 4 . 0 0 934.00 928 . 5 5 927 . 9 8 9 2 7 . 4 0 928 . 0 0 91 6 . 6 3 91 6 . 6 3 9 1 3 . 4 4 91 5 . 1 3 9 1 4 . 6 4 9 1 6 . 6 3 9 1 5 . 0 1 9 1 9 . 4 5 9 1 7 . 8 0 9 2 2 . 2 8 9 1 9 . 8 6 9 2 2 . 2 8 9 2 0 . 6 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 2 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 0 . 8 5 9 1 4 . 8 8 9 1 4 . 0 1 9 1 8 . 2 0 91 8 . 6 1 9 1 6 . 5 5 9 2 0 . 4 4 9 2 0 . 4 4 9 1 9 . 3 9 8 9 9 . 4 2 899.30 9 0 1 . 3 6 901.24 9 1 1 . 8 3 9 1 1 . 7 1 9 1 2 . 3 4 9 1 2 . 3 7 9 1 2 . 4 6 9 1 2 . 4 9 92 1 . 7 2 92 4 . 4 4 92 4 . 4 4 92 3 . 8 9 92 4 . 4 4 91 6 . 6 3 91 6 . 1 0 91 9 . 4 5 91 8 . 8 9 92 2 . 2 8 91 9 . 4 5 9 2 2 . 2 8 918 . 6 6 918 . 6 3 918 . 6 5 921 . 1 3 918 . 1 6 921. 1 4 920 . 6 4 923 . 6 1 923. 6 2 923. 1 3 925 . 3 5 925. 3 5 924. 8 6 925 . 3 6 925. 3 6 925 . 3 6 925 . 3 6 923. 6 3 921. 1 4 923 . 6 3 921 . 1 4 918 . 6 6 925. 5 3 926.03 924.07 T / W 924.00 T / W 923.00 T / W 917.00 920.00 922.07 912 . 0 0 9 2 3 . 0 1 T / W 9 2 2 . 8 7 B / W 9 2 2 . 9 9 T / W 9 1 3 . 4 5 B / W 9 2 3 . 0 0 T / W 9 1 8 . 7 1 B / W 9 1 4 . 8 5 B / W 9 2 1 . 3 7 T / W 9 2 5 . 5 3 9 2 5 . 8 2 926.63 931. 7 4 T / W 928. 8 6 B / W 932. 4 5 T / W 930. 5 7 B / W 9 3 3 . 9 0 T / W 93 3 . 4 0 B / W 9 3 1 . 7 4 T / W 9 2 8 . 8 6 B / W 928. 2 4 T / W 927. 7 4 B / W 929.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 928.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 908 . 4 5 T / W 908 . 1 5 B / W 911 . 7 9 T / W 911 . 7 9 B / W 913 . 2 3 T / W 904 . 6 2 B / W 914 . 4 2 T / W 904 . 4 3 B / W 912 . 5 1 T / W 905 . 4 8 B / W 9 1 0 . 0 0 909. 5 0 9 1 2 . 1 9 912.19 914.3 8 914 . 3 8 FES-4 R=908.14 FES-4A R=907.98 30671 C4-GRADING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-13 GRADING PLAN C4-13 GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-13 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. 101 100 101 100 XXX X . X X XXX . X X XXX . X X XX X . X X T / W XX X . X X B / W -X.X% PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTING FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA WILKINSON LAKE OHWL ELEV. 895.2 30" WETLAND BUFFER 30' WETLAND BUFFER 30' WETLAND BUFER EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND WILKINSON WAY 5 TOWNHOUSE 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924 . 0 1 PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D W W W W W W W W W W W W <II <II <II <II <II <II I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AP P R O X . O R D I N A R Y HIG H W A T E R L E V E L 89 5 . 2 EM LS >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 2 . 1 6 PROP O S E D B U I L D I N G FFE = 925 EO F 90 9 . 2 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> I IIIIIII > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I ST-106 T/C=925.24 ST-105A T/C=923.03 ST-105 T/C=923.02 ST-104 R=921.56 ST-102 T/C=921.37 ST-102A T/C=921.61 ST-101 R=917.15 FES-101 R=904.94 MH-10 R=926.49 MH-15 R=925.33 S-6 R=924.80 MH-8 R=924.42 MH-7 R=923.05 S-5 R=923.01 S-4 R=921.70 S-2 R=920.90 S-1 R=917.94 900 905 897 898 899 901 902 903 904 906 907 908 920 917 918 919 921 922 923 924 910 906 907 908 909 925 924 925 924 9 2 1 92 2 92 3 92 1 921 922 92 2 92 3 924 925 924 922 923 92 0 92 5 92 1 9 2 2 92 3 9 2 4 92 6 920 920920 91 9 921 922 92 6 921 922 923 922 923 924 906 909 909 909 9 0 9 915 906 909 912 918 921 903 906 909 918921924 900 897 903 906 909 912 9 1 8 92 1 92 4 92 5 923 924 925 923 924 925 922 923 924 922 924 926 -9.0% - 0 . 9 % -1.5% -1 . 5 % -25.0% -2 5 . 0 % -1 6 . 9 % -2 . 0 % -9 . 1 % -5 . 3 % -24.8% -1.1% -1.1 % -1.1 % -0.9% -0.4% -1 3 . 6 % -2 3 . 9 % -33 . 2 % -2 4 . 1 % -1 0 . 0 % -1 6 . 3 % -1 6 . 1 % -6 . 3 % -1 6 . 9 % -5 . 6 % -46 . 8 % -20. 9 % 1.9 % - 2 9 . 7 % - 1 3 . 0 % - 4 8 . 0 % -29.0% -14.9% -1 0 . 4 % -4 . 0 % -3 . 0 % 900 896 897 898 899 928 . 5 5 927 . 9 8 9 2 7 . 4 0 928 . 0 0 9 2 0 . 6 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 2 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 0 . 8 5 9 1 9 . 3 9 901.24 9 1 1 . 8 3 9 1 1 . 7 1 9 1 2 . 3 4 9 1 2 . 3 7 9 1 2 . 4 6 9 1 2 . 4 9 913.00 912.88 914. 8 3 914.8 0 920.5 6 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 3 . 1 9 9 2 1 . 7 2 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 3 . 8 9 9 2 4 . 4 4 9 2 4 . 4 4 913.8 6 912.1 3 912 . 3 1 91 4 . 0 8 91 8 . 1 7 916 . 6 3 91 6 . 9 4 916 . 0 2 91 2 . 7 5 911 . 0 4 911.0 2 910.7 9 923 . 6 2 923. 1 3 925 . 3 5 925. 3 5 924 . 8 6 925. 3 6 925 . 3 6 924 . 2 9 925 . 3 6 925. 3 6 925. 3 6 925 . 3 6 923. 6 3 ??? 9 2 6 . 0 1 926 . 1 9 925 . 8 0 925. 5 3 926.03 925.72 925.78 925.37 925.00 924.61 923.32 923.04 924.07 T / W 922.07 9 2 3 . 0 1 T / W 9 2 2 . 8 7 B / W 9 2 2 . 9 9 T / W 9 1 3 . 4 5 B / W 9 2 3 . 0 0 T / W 9 1 8 . 7 1 B / W 9 1 9 . 8 1 T / W 9 1 4 . 9 8 B / W 9 1 4 . 8 5 B / W 9 2 1 . 3 7 T / W 9 2 0 . 6 3 T / W 9 1 9 . 1 9 B / W 9 1 6 . 3 6 B / W 9 2 0 . 1 7 T / W 9 2 5 . 5 3 9 2 5 . 8 2 926.63 926.9 2 927.04 926 . 8 2 926.84 926.5 8 926 . 4 5 92 5 . 7 2 92 5 . 5 8 9 2 5 . 5 3 931. 7 4 T / W 928. 8 6 B / W 932. 4 5 T / W 930. 5 7 B / W 9 3 1 . 7 4 T / W 9 2 8 . 8 6 B / W 928. 2 4 T / W 927 . 7 4 B / W 929.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 928.00 T/W 923.00 B/W 9 1 0 . 0 0 909. 5 0 FES-4 R=908.14 FES-4A R=907.98 922 . 9 1 923 . 3 9 923 . 4 9 923.65 923 . 3 0 923 . 0 5 922 . 8 7 922.44 921 . 8 0 921 . 9 6 921.56 921.91 9 2 1 . 4 7 9 2 1 . 2 3 9 2 1 . 5 2 9 2 1 . 3 8 9 2 2 . 5 8 9 2 2 . 4 7 922. 5 9 922 . 6 7 922.19 921.71 9 2 2 . 0 7 9 2 1 . 9 8 9 2 2 . 2 6 9 2 1 . 9 6 925 921 921 922 922 923 923 924 92 292 3924 92 0 9 2 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 9 2 4 92 2 923 922 923 924 924 9 2 5 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 9 1 4 . 0 0 914.00 924.50 925.00 925.00 924.50 924.50 924.5 0 924.50 924.50 924.50 924.75 924.50924.75 924.50924.75 924.75 92 4 . 7 5 92 4 . 7 5 92 4 . 7 5 92 4 . 7 5 92 4 . 7 5 92 4 . 8 0 92 4 . 7 5 924.75 924.7 5 924.75 924.75 924.7 5 924.7 5 924.7 5 924.7 5 924.7 5 924.7 5 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 925.0 0 928.50 FES-6A R=904.90 FES-6 R=903.64 OCS-2 T/C=908.00 922 92 4 30671 C4-GRADING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-14 GRADING PLAN C4-14 GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-14 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. 101 100 101 100 XXX X . X X XXX . X X XXX . X X XX X . X X T / W XX X . X X B / W -X.X% EXISTING FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA WILKINSON LAKE OHWL ELEV. 895.2 30" WETLAND BUFFER 30' WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922.1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE = 934.52 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE = 929.58 PROPO S E D B U I L D I N G FFE = 925 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO UFO FO U UFO MB V V EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX SB-st-13 U U G U U UG U G U V WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E T WET WET WET WET WET W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T WET WE T WET WET WET WET WE T WET 30 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P WA T E R A N D S E W E R E A S M E N T EM LS Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY XX X X 5 11 X X X X X BUILDING A FFE = 934 LFE = 923 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L1 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 916.6 L2 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.9 L3 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.7 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 927 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920.4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924.0 1 WILKI N S O N W A Y PROPOSED BAS I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 1.47 m p h Faste s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) West L e g ( W e s t ) North L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I IIIII I I I I I I I > > > >> > > > >>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0 1 2 2 >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I 0 1 1 0 1 1 PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT 214 LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT 221 MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST 91 SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS 860 LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. 1,461 SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL QTY DESCRIPTION SEEDING 44,557 SF BASIN SEED MIX 334,660 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX 423,365 SF MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF 20,387 SF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER 4,885 LANDSCAPE EDGING 30671 C5-LAND DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : AL I N A . E L T A M I M I WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C5-10 OVERALL PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN C5-10 OVERALL PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN 300 30671 C5-10 MINNESOTALINO LAKES DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 0 SCALE IN FEET 80 160 C5-13 C5-11 C5-14 C5-12 NOTE: FOR SPECIES LIST REEFER TO SHEET C5-15 X X X X X PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 EX SB- U AS H S T R E E T 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 X X X X X X X X X X X X BUILDING A FFE = 934 LFE = 923 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 CLU B H O U S E FFE = 927 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) Wes t L e g ( W e s t ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP) LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 0 1 2 2 > > > > I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II > I I SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SEEDING BASIN SEED MIX FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER LANDSCAPE EDGING PLANT SCHEDULE 30671 C5-LAND DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : AL I N A . E L T A M I M I WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C5-11 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN C5-11 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN 300 30671 C5-11 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ·EXISTING TREES CAN BE USED TO FULFILL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ·STANDARDS MAY BE MET WITH DIFFERENT SIZES OF TREES AND SHRUBS ·NEW TREES MAY FULFILL CANOPY COVERAGE, FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE, LANDSCAPE SCREEN AND OPEN SPACE STANDARDS SIMULTANEOUSLY IF APPLICABLE BY LOCATION. CANOPY COVER REQUIREMENTS: THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE BY ESTABLISHING TREE CANOPY COVER TO INTERCEPT RAINFALL, PROTECT PAVEMENT FROM SUN DETERIORATION, REDUCE THE HEAT ISLAND AFFECT, AND IMPROVE AESTHETICS. THE REQUIRED MINIMUM COVERAGE FOR ALL USES IS 40% EQUATION: VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE (SF) X CANOPY COVER PERCENT = REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVER SQUARE FEET. ·217,670 x 0.4 = 87,068 ·LARGE TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 25 X 950 SF = 23,750 ·MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 4 X 500 SF = 2,000 ·LARGE TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 65 X 600 SF = 39,000 ·MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 57 X 250 SF = 14,250 ·SMALL TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 4 X 125 SF = 750 ·LARGE TREES PROPOSED WITHIN (7) - (12) FEET OF VEHICULAR EDGE = 16 X 300 SF = 4,800 ·MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED WITHIN (7) - (12) FEET OF VEHICULAR EDGE = 21 X 125 SF = 2,625 / TOTAL PROPOSED: 87,175 FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: TREES PLANTED WITHIN (30) FEET OF BUILDING SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHIN FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE ZONE. SMALLER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: 1 LARGE TREE = 1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS OR 3 SMALL SHRUBS OR 2 SMALL TREES. FOR EVERY 100 LF OF BUILDING 2 LARGE TREES OR 6 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. ·8,000 LF / 100 X 2 = 160 LARGE TREES REQUIRED / 160 LARGE TREES PROPOSED / 67 SMALL TREES & 291 SMALL SHRUBS IN SUBSTITUTION ·8,000 LF / 100 X 6 = 480 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 480 LARGE TREES PROPOSED OPEN AREA REQUIREMENTS: FOR EVERY 2500 SF PF OPEN AREA 1 LARGE TREES OR 2 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. SMALLER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: 1 LARGE TREE = 1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS OR 3 SMALL SHRUBS OR 2 SMALL TREES. ·409,393 / 2500 = 164 LARGE TREES REQUIRED / 164 LARGE TREES PROPOSED 409,393 / 2500 X 2 = 328 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 328 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED BOULEVARD TREE REQUIREMENTS: BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT THE RATE OF (1) TREE PER EVERY (70) FT LF OF LOT FRONTAGE ·3,448 LF / 70 LF = 50 TREES REQUIRED / 50 TREES PROPOSED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES AND ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREETS TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS: ·85 TREES TO BE REMOVED. ·57 OUT OF 85 SIGNIFICANT TREES IN GOOD/FAIR CONDITION TO BE REPLACE / 57 TREES PROPOSED. NOTE: FOR QUANTITIES REFER TO THE SCHEDULE ON C5-10. FOR SPECIES LIST REFER TO SHEET C5-15 13 19 15 13 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X X X X X X PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 934.52 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 929.58 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E = 93 0 . 0 8 U U FO FO U FO V V WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 X X X X X X 11 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PRO P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 100 Y R H W L = 920 . 4 8 PRO P O S E D RAI N G A R D E N 2 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 WILKI N S O N W A Y I > > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I > > > > > >> >> > > >> 0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SEEDING BASIN SEED MIX FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER LANDSCAPE EDGING PLANT SCHEDULE FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT 46 LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT 25 MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST 9 SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SHRUB AREAS 241 LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 386 SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT SYMBOL QTY DESCRIPTION SEEDING 4,737 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BASIN SEED MIX 82,97 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX 2,950 LF LANDSCAPE EDGING 30671 C5-LAND DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : AL I N A . E L T A M I M I WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C5-12 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN C5-12 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN 300 30671 C5-12 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 NOTE: FOR QUANTITIES REFER TO THE SCHEDULE ON C5-10. FOR SPECIES LIST REFER TO SHEET C5-15 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. OPEN AREA SF NOT COUNTED TOWARDS REQUIRED TREES FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CANOPY COVER REQUIREMENTS: EQUATION: VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE (SF) X CANOPY COVER PERCENT = REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVER SQUARE FEET. ·95,230 x 0.4 = 38,093 ·LARGE TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 25 X 950 SF = 23,750 ·MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 7 X 500 SF =3,500 ·LARGE TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 16 X 600 SF = 9,600 ·MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 16 X 250 SF = 4,000 / TOTAL PROPOSED: 40,850 FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: FOR EVERY 100 LF OF BUILDING 2 LARGE TREES OR 6 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. ·3,323 LF / 100 X 2 = 65 LARGE TREES / 30 LARGE TREES AND 90 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED ·8,000 LF / 100 X 6 = 480 200 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 200 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED PEN AREA REQUIREMENTS: FOR EVERY 2500 SF PF OPEN AREA 1 LARGE TREES OR 2 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. SMALLER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: 1 LARGE TREE = 1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS OR 3 SMALL SHRUBS OR 2 SMALL TREES. ·94,969 / 2500 = 38 LARGE TREES REQUIRED / 38 LARGE TREES PROPOSED ·94,969 / 2500 X 2 = 76 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 76 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES AND ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREETS U G U G U X AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W WWET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET W E T WET WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WE T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T 30 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P WA T E R A N D S E W E R E A S M E N T NO R T H O A K S F A R M S I N C 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 4 - 0 0 0 8 WO O D S T R O M , J E R R Y A 15 9 1 A S H S T . 34 - 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 1 - 0 0 0 1 SAGD A L E N A L A N D & N A T A L I E R 1601 A S H S T 35-31 - 2 2 - 3 2 - 0 0 0 7 WILKINSON WAY 5 BUILDING B FFE = 934 LFE = 923 L1 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.7 L2 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.1 L3 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 923.6 L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L1 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 916.6 L2 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 918.9 L3 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 921.7 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 1 1 0 1 1 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SEEDING BASIN SEED MIX FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER LANDSCAPE EDGING PLANT SCHEDULE EXISTING ROW PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED TOWNHOME 30671 C5-LAND DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : AL I N A . E L T A M I M I WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C5-13 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN C5-13 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN 300 30671 C5-13 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 NOTE: FOR QUANTITIES REFER TO THE SCHEDULE ON C5-10. FOR SPECIES LIST REFER TO SHEET C5-15 ASH STREET VEGETATIVE BUFFER SECTION ELEVATION SCALE = 1" - 20' ASH STREET VEGETATIVE BUFFER SECTION CUT 58'35' 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 92 2 . 1 6 PROP O S E D B U I L D I N G FFE = 925 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 WI L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D W W W W W W W W W W W W WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET W E T 30 ' W H I T E B E A R T O W N S H I P WA T E R A N D S E W E R E A S M E N T AP P R O X . O R D I N A R Y HIG H W A T E R L E V E L 895 . 2 EM LS WILKINSON WAY 5 TOWNHOUSE L4 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L5 B2 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 925.4 L4 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.8 L5 B1 TOWNHOUSE FFE = 924.7 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RAIN G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 924 . 0 1 PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > I I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I I I > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> I IIIIIII > > > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SEEDING BASIN SEED MIX FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER LANDSCAPE EDGING PLANT SCHEDULE FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT 46 LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT)2.5" CAL B & B MT 25 MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT)2" CAL B & B ST 9 SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER)1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SHRUB AREAS 241 LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT)5 GAL CONT 386 SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER)2 GAL CONT SYMBOL QTY DESCRIPTION SEEDING 4,737 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BASIN SEED MIX 82,97 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX 2,950 LF LANDSCAPE EDGING 30671 C5-LAND DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : AL I N A . E L T A M I M I WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C5-14 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN C5-14 PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN 300 30671 C5-14 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET 40 80 DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 8' NOTE: FOR QUANTITIES REFER TO THE SCHEDULE ON C5-10. FOR SPECIES LIST REFER TO SHEET C5-15 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. OPEN AREA SF NOT COUNTED TOWARDS REQUIRED TREES 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 2, 2025 Re: Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Review 026515-000 WSB’s review of the Preliminary Plat for the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by ISG and received March 20, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plan and Plat prepared by ISG, dated March 10, 2025. • Wilkinson Waters Stormwater Report prepared by ISG, dated March 20, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Wilkinson Waters Development includes 76 acres south of Ash Street/County Road 32, West of Centerville Road/County Road 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, the border with the City of North Oaks. The project proposes 56 Townhome units, two (2) 100-unit apartments, one (1) 100-unit senior living facility and 33,000 square feet of commercial retail space. • Grading The Wilkinson Waters Development includes site grading for the townhomes, apartments, and retail space as well as the connecting roads, driveways, and parking areas. The proposed site grades will raise the site 5 to 10 feet. The proposed site grade and the addition of building heights will be very high comparatively. It appears that the site elevations are based on the underground parking and groundwater elevations. Comments: 1. Site should be designed to better match existing grades. Lowering the site approximately 5 feet from than what is proposed. The applicant should consider an underground subsurface drainage system. 2. Provide EOF elevations, locations and routes for all low points in the paved and greenspaces. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 2 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 3. Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a Minnesota licensed structural engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance a. Provide top and bottom of wall elevations at beginning and end of wall, at point of maximum height, and at points along the length of wall to adequately describe the retaining wall and to display final grading accurately. b. Retaining walls are not allowed in easements or public rights-of-way c. Provide fences for safety as required 4. Show all high and break points 5. Label all inlet elevations 6. Provide slopes across parking areas and along curbs 7. Minimize drainage areas to all underground parking entrances a. Provide overflow options • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 Needed if basins landlocked Currently Proposed 17.76 45.54 117.14 Needed if basins landlocked Comments: 1. Compliance with stormwater requirements will be reviewed by the City. However, any wetland impacts must be permitted through the LGU for the site, VLAWMO. 2. Per NURP design criteria, sedimentation basins must provide dead storage of at least the 2.5” storm event volume of runoff from the tributary area. The 2.5” storm event must be provided in future modeling to ensure compliance with this standard. a. If this standard is met, additional pretreatment such as the SAFL Baffles and rain gardens are not needed. These pretreatment BMPs are recommended to be removed if Basin 1 is sufficiently sized so as to reduce future maintenance needs. MIDS modeling is also not needed if Basin 1 is demonstrated as meeting NURP design criteria. 3. A surfacewater reuse system is required. Rice Creek Watershed District staff may be able to supply a water reuse spreadsheet for use in calculating water reuse rates and areas for the site. 4. The steepest allowable slope below the 10’ aquatic bench is 3:1. Current grading of 2:1 is too steep and must be revised. 5. The outlet pipe for Basin 1 must be submerged at least 1’ below the NWL. a. Considering this basin is intended for irrigation reuse, the outlet pipe should be set such that it is submerged even at the lowest planned water elevation. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 3 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 6. An impervious clay liner may be required below Basin 1 as geotech borings in and around the pond show some sandy/silty soils that may infiltrate water meant for irrigation reuse. This will be evaluated with the next submittal. 7. Tree plantings are not recommended on the Basin 1 berm as root growth may weaken its integrity over time. 8. All BMPs and site depressions need to show EOF locations and elevations. 9. Curb cuts must have rock stabilization over the flow path to BMPs. 10. Wilkinson Way will be a public road so inlet spread and run calcs, in particular at sag points, must be provided and ensure an 8’ drivable lane during the 3-year storm event. 11. All proposed pipe serving Wilkinson Way must have supporting calculations to ensure there is capacity for conveying the 10-year storm event. 12. The maximum pipe velocity is 10 ft/sec and the minimum is 3 ft/sec. 13. The City minimum storm sewer size for public roads is 15” and must be RCP. Include storm sewer pipe material on utilities sheets. a. Pipe from ST-108A to ST-108 must be increased to 15” diameter. 14. Structure types and sizes should be called out for Wilkinson Way storm sewer. 15. Show storm sewer in profile view along Wilkinson Way to ensure there are no utility conflicts. a. Utility crossings should be checked across the site to ensure there are no conflicts and to call out insulation as needed. 16. Ensure structure diameters are sized properly for alignments with pipes at acute angles or with large diameter pipes. 17. What is the purpose for structure ST-2? 18. How will the low points at driveways into Buildings A and B be drained? 19. Indicate tip-out gutter as needed to ensure pooling is avoided in upgradient portions of parking lots. 20. ST-3(72) should be moved to the corner of the nearest parking stall rather than on the curb radius. 21. It is recommended to route ST-201 directly to FES-4A to avoid daylighting drainage and potentially flooding onto the proposed trail. 22. The OCS details on sheet C0-26 do not match HydroCAD modeling. 23. HydroCAD modeling has a 36” pipe from OCS-2 to FES-6, however this is shown as a 30” pipe in the plans. 24. HydroCAD modeling of OCS-2 has a 5’ wide weir, but a 6’ wide grate. Please reconcile these differences. 25. Use native prairie seed mix on Basin 1 slopes. 26. Deconflict storm sewer and proposed trees to the extent practical, overlap of planting can result in root intrusion long-term, especially where trees are proposed near structures. • Water Supply The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area being served by Lino Lakes via a 12” trunk water line. Lino Lakes City water is about 1.5 miles away and the City is not considering an extension at this time. In the interim the site is planned to be supplied by the existing White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes and into the north end of North Oaks. This will require a Joint Powers Agreement between all of the Cities involved. The development proposes two connections. A 12” connection at the south end on the west side of the proposed roundabout which will be extended along Wilkinson Way north to the Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 4 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review north end for a future connection to Ash Street (CR 32) to meet the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The second connection will utilize the existing 8” stub as part of the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes . Otherwise, the development will include a water system with 8- inch diameter water main and various stub sizes being extended to each lot depending on its use. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Comments: 1. Remove the proposed 12” gate valve on the north leg of the tee. The gate valve will be installed with the future extension of the line to the north. 2. The existing watermain stub at the roundabout is 12” not 8” 3. Locate proposed gate valves consistently on all water service stubs 4. Label all water service stub size, length, and material 5. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) 6. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 7. Shift gate valve from northern leg to southern leg of 12” x 8” cross 8. Maintain minimum required 10’ horizontal separation between watermain and storm sewer alignments 9. Note separation between sanitary sewer and water services across Wilkinson Way a. Some services will need to be shifted to maintain separation. • Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Wilkinson Waters Development is proposed to connect to the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes. There is also an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 that is believed to be owned and maintained by White Bear Township as well and is planned to serve Lino Lakes sewer district 4. This will require a Joint Powers Agreements between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Per the Centerville Road Sanitary Sewer memo updated 4/22/21, the City of Lino Lakes service district 4 has 354 GPM capacity reserved in the Centerville Road trunk line. There is an additional lift station planned in the future to serve the remainder of district 4 that will pump into the 18” line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. This forcemain can be drilled within City or County right of way in the future. The 8 inch line that is being required to extend to Ash Street would only serve a small localized area of sewer district 4. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with various sized service pipes being extended to each lot depending on its use. An additional sanitary sewer stub will be extended to the north at Ash Street (CR 32) for future connections. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Additionally calculations will need to be made for the increased flows to the existing lift station in North Oaks and whether upgrading of the pumps will need to occur. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 5 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Comments: 1. Extend the existing 18" sanitary sewer stub outside the roadway into right of way as shown in the attached redlines 2. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) a. The sanitary sewer between Lots 3 and 4 Block 1 would require a 40’ total easement 3. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 4. Maintain sanitary sewer manholes on road centerlines 5. Applicant to verify the existing Lift Station has capacity for the proposed project. • Transportation Ensure City parking space requirements are met and ADA spaces are all marked on the site plan. Townhouses project with 8+ units require guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units. Include lighting unit type and mounting on the Photometric Plan. Trails and sidewalks Show the sidewalk/trail connection at the Ash Street and Wilkinson Way intersection. Comments: 1. See comments provided on the Wilkinson Waters TIS, major comments include: a. Review trip generation b. Verify most recent site plan is incorporated into the study c. Forecast traffic on Wilkinson Way d. Review trip distribution and turning movement exhibits, volumes are missing e. Revise LOS and turn lane analysis based on revised turning movement calculations 2. The intersection at Wilkinson Way and Ash St/CR 32 will need to be right in right out a. Turn lane plans shall be submitted with final plat. They will require Anoka County approval. • Wetlands and Mitigation Plan The Vadnais Lake Area WMO (VLAWMO) (WCA LGU) issued a Notice of Decision (NOD) (LGU No. 14.2021) approving the wetland boundaries on March 17, 2022 (Appendix A). The decision is valid for 5 years. The WCA NOD also confirmed that Wetland 7 is an incidental wetland and therefore not regulated-under WCA. The USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) on April 6, 2022 for Wetlands 8, 9 and 10 (File No. MVP-2015-03940-SSC) (Appendix A). The AJD is valid for 5 years. A map of the site location is provided in Figure 1. Three wetlands (Wetlands 1, 7, and 10) were delineated within the current project area in September 2021 by KES (Figure 2). Previously submitted information discussed the delineation in more detail and included the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and soil survey mapping. A copy of the previously Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 6 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review submitted delineation report (Hawkins-Rogalla Lino Lakes Wetland Delineation Report) is available upon request. A wetland replacement plan and no loss request (for incidental wetland) was submitted, reviewed, and approved through VLAWMO and the City. The TEP in its WCA Notice of Decision agreed that WL7 is incidental per WCA rules, WL10 is wetland based on new guidance and the WL5 boundary was extended to the northwest. Per aerial photos in 3-9- 2022 addendum, WL9 and WL8 are wetland. No other changes were directed to all other delineated wetland boundaries in the project area. Approved wetland boundaries are shown in the 3-10-2022 Rogalla and Hawkins surveys from Kurth Surveying, Inc. The proposed WCA-regulated 0.13 ac of impact to Wetland 10 will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio via the debiting of wetland bank credits from the Rapp Farm and Anderson Slough wetland bank (#170) located within major watershed 20 and Bank Service Area 7, which is the same major watershed and Bank Service Area as the project location. This bank is owned by the project applicant. A draft Standard Credit Withdrawal Form is included. Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for USACE-regulated Wetland 7. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Wilkinson Waters Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The proposed pond berm and trail grading appears to result in floodplain fill. Calculation of compensatory cut must be provided to ensure there is no net fill in the floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features The plan shows White Bear Lake Township easements (30’ and 50’) with the existing sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the site. White Bear Lake Township has commented that the Township has no easement and that the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. Please update the linework or provide a record showing the easements. Comments: 1. For pipe within drainage and utility easements that is greater than 10’ deep, easements must be set with a width equal to the pipe depth. For example, a 20’ deep pipe would require 20’ wide easements on either side of the alignment. a. This appears to be needed for P-101, P-102, P-111, P-110, and P-202. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 7 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 2. Drainage and utility easements are needed for all proposed rain gardens up to the extents of the 100-year HWL. 3. Provide existing easement figure showing all ownership 4. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be dedicated over wetlands, ditches, and the greenway • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Private stormwater facilities will be maintained through a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities. The City of Lino Lakes shall be party to the Declaration. City Engineer to provide template. • Permits Required Required permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Permit 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 2, 2025 Re: Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Review 026515-000 WSB’s review of the Preliminary Plat for the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by ISG and received March 20, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: •Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plan and Plat prepared by ISG, dated March 10, 2025. •Wilkinson Waters Stormwater Report prepared by ISG, dated March 20, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering •General The Wilkinson Waters Development includes 76 acres south of Ash Street/County Road 32, West of Centerville Road/County Road 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, the border with the City of North Oaks. The project proposes 56 Townhome units, two (2) 100-unit apartments, one (1) 100-unit senior living facility and 33,000 square feet of commercial retail space. •Grading The Wilkinson Waters Development includes site grading for the townhomes, apartments, and retail space as well as the connecting roads, driveways, and parking areas. The proposed site grades will raise the site 5 to 10 feet. The proposed site grade and the addition of building heights will be very high comparatively. It appears that the site elevations are based on the underground parking and groundwater elevations. Comments: 1.Site should be designed to better match existing grades. Lowering the siteapproximately 5 feet from than what is proposed. The applicant shouldconsider an underground subsurface drainage system. 2.Provide EOF elevations, locations and routes for all low points in the paved andgreenspaces. Attachment 13. City Engineer Memo Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 2 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 3.Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a Minnesotalicensed structural engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Officialprior to permit issuance a.Provide top and bottom of wall elevations at beginning and end of wall, atpoint of maximum height, and at points along the length of wall to adequatelydescribe the retaining wall and to display final grading accurately.b.Retaining walls are not allowed in easements or public rights-of-wayc.Provide fences for safety as required4.Show all high and break points 5.Label all inlet elevations6.Provide slopes across parking areas and along curbs7.Minimize drainage areas to all underground parking entrancesa.Provide overflow options •Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 Needed if basins landlocked Currently Proposed 17.76 45.54 117.14 Needed if basins landlocked Comments: 1.Compliance with stormwater requirements will be reviewed by the City. However, anywetland impacts must be permitted through the LGU for the site, VLAWMO.2.Per NURP design criteria, sedimentation basins must provide dead storage of at least the 2.5” storm event volume of runoff from the tributary area. The 2.5” stormevent must be provided in future modeling to ensure compliance with this standard.a.If this standard is met, additional pretreatment such as the SAFL Baffles andrain gardens are not needed. These pretreatment BMPs are recommendedto be removed if Basin 1 is sufficiently sized so as to reduce futuremaintenance needs. MIDS modeling is also not needed if Basin 1 is demonstrated as meeting NURP design criteria.3.A surfacewater reuse system is required. Rice Creek Watershed District staff may beable to supply a water reuse spreadsheet for use in calculating water reuse rates andareas for the site.4.The steepest allowable slope below the 10’ aquatic bench is 3:1. Current grading of2:1 is too steep and must be revised.5.The outlet pipe for Basin 1 must be submerged at least 1’ below the NWL.a.Considering this basin is intended for irrigation reuse, the outlet pipe shouldbe set such that it is submerged even at the lowest planned water elevation. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 3 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 6.An impervious clay liner may be required below Basin 1 as geotech borings in andaround the pond show some sandy/silty soils that may infiltrate water meant forirrigation reuse. This will be evaluated with the next submittal. 7.Tree plantings are not recommended on the Basin 1 berm as root growth mayweaken its integrity over time.8.All BMPs and site depressions need to show EOF locations and elevations.9.Curb cuts must have rock stabilization over the flow path to BMPs.10.Wilkinson Way will be a public road so inlet spread and run calcs, in particular at sagpoints, must be provided and ensure an 8’ drivable lane during the 3-year storm event.11.All proposed pipe serving Wilkinson Way must have supporting calculations toensure there is capacity for conveying the 10-year storm event.12.The maximum pipe velocity is 10 ft/sec and the minimum is 3 ft/sec. 13.The City minimum storm sewer size for public roads is 15” and must be RCP. Includestorm sewer pipe material on utilities sheets. a.Pipe from ST-108A to ST-108 must be increased to 15” diameter.14.Structure types and sizes should be called out for Wilkinson Way storm sewer.15.Show storm sewer in profile view along Wilkinson Way to ensure there are no utilityconflicts. a.Utility crossings should be checked across the site to ensure there are noconflicts and to call out insulation as needed. 16.Ensure structure diameters are sized properly for alignments with pipes at acuteangles or with large diameter pipes. 17.What is the purpose for structure ST-2?18.How will the low points at driveways into Buildings A and B be drained? 19.Indicate tip-out gutter as needed to ensure pooling is avoided in upgradient portionsof parking lots. 20.ST-3(72) should be moved to the corner of the nearest parking stall rather than onthe curb radius. 21.It is recommended to route ST-201 directly to FES-4A to avoid daylighting drainageand potentially flooding onto the proposed trail. 22.The OCS details on sheet C0-26 do not match HydroCAD modeling.23. HydroCAD modeling has a 36” pipe from OCS-2 to FES-6, however this is shown as a 30” pipe in the plans.24.HydroCAD modeling of OCS-2 has a 5’ wide weir, but a 6’ wide grate. Please reconcile these differences.25.Use native prairie seed mix on Basin 1 slopes. 26.Deconflict storm sewer and proposed trees to the extent practical, overlap of plantingcan result in root intrusion long-term, especially where trees are proposed near structures. •Water Supply The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area being served by Lino Lakes via a 12” trunk water line. Lino Lakes City water is about 1.5 miles away and the City is not considering an extension at this time. In the interim the site is planned to be supplied by the existing White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes and into the north end of North Oaks. This will require a Joint Powers Agreement between all of the Cities involved. The development proposes two connections. A 12” connection at the south end on the west side of the proposed roundabout which will be extended along Wilkinson Way north to the Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 4 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review north end for a future connection to Ash Street (CR 32) to meet the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The second connection will utilize the existing 8” stub as part of the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes . Otherwise, the development will include a water system with 8- inch diameter water main and various stub sizes being extended to each lot depending on its use. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Comments: 1.Remove the proposed 12” gate valve on the north leg of the tee. The gate valve willbe installed with the future extension of the line to the north.2.The existing watermain stub at the roundabout is 12” not 8”3. Locate proposed gate valves consistently on all water service stubs4.Label all water service stub size, length, and material5.Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20'centered on the utility)6.Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection7.Shift gate valve from northern leg to southern leg of 12” x 8” cross8.Maintain minimum required 10’ horizontal separation between watermain and stormsewer alignments9.Note separation between sanitary sewer and water services across Wilkinson Waya.Some services will need to be shifted to maintain separation. •Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Wilkinson Waters Development is proposed to connect to the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes. There is also an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 that is believed to be owned and maintained by White Bear Township as well and is planned to serve Lino Lakes sewer district 4. This will require a Joint Powers Agreements between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Per the Centerville Road Sanitary Sewer memo updated 4/22/21, the City of Lino Lakes service district 4 has 354 GPM capacity reserved in the Centerville Road trunk line. There is an additional lift station planned in the future to serve the remainder of district 4 that will pump into the 18” line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. This forcemain can be drilled within City or County right of way in the future. The 8 inch line that is being required to extend to Ash Street would only serve a small localized area of sewer district 4. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with various sized service pipes being extended to each lot depending on its use. An additional sanitary sewer stub will be extended to the north at Ash Street (CR 32) for future connections. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Additionally calculations will need to be made for the increased flows to the existing lift station in North Oaks and whether upgrading of the pumps will need to occur. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 5 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Comments: 1. Extend the existing 18" sanitary sewer stub outside the roadway into right of way as shown in the attached redlines2.Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20'centered on the utility)a.The sanitary sewer between Lots 3 and 4 Block 1 would require a 40’ totaleasement3.Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 4.Maintain sanitary sewer manholes on road centerlines5.Applicant to verify the existing Lift Station has capacity for the proposed project. •Transportation Ensure City parking space requirements are met and ADA spaces are all marked on the site plan. Townhouses project with 8+ units require guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units. Include lighting unit type and mounting on the Photometric Plan. Trails and sidewalks Show the sidewalk/trail connection at the Ash Street and Wilkinson Way intersection. Comments: 1.See comments provided on the Wilkinson Waters TIS, major comments include: a.Review trip generation b.Verify most recent site plan is incorporated into the study c.Forecast traffic on Wilkinson Way d.Review trip distribution and turning movement exhibits, volumes are missing e.Revise LOS and turn lane analysis based on revised turning movement calculations 2.The intersection at Wilkinson Way and Ash St/CR 32 will need to be right in right out a.Turn lane plans shall be submitted with final plat. They will require Anoka County approval. •Wetlands and Mitigation Plan The Vadnais Lake Area WMO (VLAWMO) (WCA LGU) issued a Notice of Decision (NOD) (LGU No. 14.2021) approving the wetland boundaries on March 17, 2022 (Appendix A). The decision is valid for 5 years. The WCA NOD also confirmed that Wetland 7 is an incidental wetland and therefore not regulated-under WCA. The USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) on April 6, 2022 for Wetlands 8, 9 and 10 (File No. MVP-2015-03940-SSC) (Appendix A). The AJD is valid for 5 years. A map of the site location is provided in Figure 1. Three wetlands (Wetlands 1, 7, and 10) were delineated within the current project area in September 2021 by KES (Figure 2). Previously submitted information discussed the delineation in more detail and included the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and soil survey mapping. A copy of the previously Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 6 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review submitted delineation report (Hawkins-Rogalla Lino Lakes Wetland Delineation Report) is available upon request. A wetland replacement plan and no loss request (for incidental wetland) was submitted, reviewed, and approved through VLAWMO and the City. The TEP in its WCA Notice of Decision agreed that WL7 is incidental per WCA rules, WL10 is wetland based on new guidance and the WL5 boundary was extended to the northwest. Per aerial photos in 3-9- 2022 addendum, WL9 and WL8 are wetland. No other changes were directed to all other delineated wetland boundaries in the project area. Approved wetland boundaries are shown in the 3-10-2022 Rogalla and Hawkins surveys from Kurth Surveying, Inc. The proposed WCA-regulated 0.13 ac of impact to Wetland 10 will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio via the debiting of wetland bank credits from the Rapp Farm and Anderson Slough wetland bank (#170) located within major watershed 20 and Bank Service Area 7, which is the same major watershed and Bank Service Area as the project location. This bank is owned by the project applicant. A draft Standard Credit Withdrawal Form is included. Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for USACE-regulated Wetland 7. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. •Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Wilkinson Waters Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. •Floodplain The proposed pond berm and trail grading appears to result in floodplain fill. Calculation of compensatory cut must be provided to ensure there is no net fill in the floodplain. •Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features The plan shows White Bear Lake Township easements (30’ and 50’) with the existing sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the site. White Bear Lake Township has commented that the Township has no easement and that the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. Please update the linework or provide a record showing the easements. Comments: 1.For pipe within drainage and utility easements that is greater than 10’ deep, easements must be set with a width equal to the pipe depth. For example, a 20’ deeppipe would require 20’ wide easements on either side of the alignment.a.This appears to be needed for P-101, P-102, P-111, P-110, and P-202. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 7 Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review 2.Drainage and utility easements are needed for all proposed rain gardens up to theextents of the 100-year HWL.3. Provide existing easement figure showing all ownership 4.Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be dedicated over wetlands,ditches, and the greenway •Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. •Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. •Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Private stormwater facilities will be maintained through a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities. The City of Lino Lakes shall be party to the Declaration. City Engineer to provide template. •Permits Required Required permits may include some of the following and others: 1.NPDES General Construction Permit2.City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction3.Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit4.Minnesota Department of Health5.Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Permit 6.US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. You don't often get email from mertel@linolakes.us. Learn why this is important From:Logan Keehr To:Katie Larsen Subject:RE: Wilkinson Waters Submittals Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:19:59 AM Attachments:image001.jpg Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hi Katie, The proposed ROW line shown should be sufficient. The access on Ash St. will need a right turn lane and will be a right in/right out access. Let me know if you have any questions. Logan Keehr, PE Traffic Engineer II Anoka County Transportation Division Highway-Transit-Fleet-Surveyor-GIS 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 www.anokacountymn.gov Office: 763-324-3100 Direct: 763-324-3183 Fax: 763-324-3020 Our passion is your safe way home! From: Marissa Ertel <MErtel@linolakes.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 2:08 PM To: Logan Keehr <Logan.Keehr@anokacountymn.gov>; Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; pchaffey@isd12.org; mgrossklaus@isd12.org; smassey@flaschools.org; crehnberg@flaschools.org; timothy.wald@isd624.org; Kevin Kress <KKress@northoaksmn.gov>; pwplanreview@ramseycounty.us; brian.corcoran@vlamo.org Cc: Katie Larsen <KLarsen@linolakes.us> Subject: Wilkinson Waters Submittals EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This message originated from outside the Anoka County email Attachment 14. Anoka County Highway Department Email To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments – Wilkinson Waters PPP PP Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1. Complete the noise mitigation study and submit findings if any additional berming or screening is required. 2. Building setbacks to Wilkinson Lake as proposed should be maintained. 3. Work with planning and zoning on building heights. Currently building heights exceed the requirements for the shoreland district. a. Board recommends additional overstory planted adjacent to buildings that exceed the requirements for additional screening and sight lines. 4. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. i. Water balance study is being conducted b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA i. Infiltration basins are shown for pretreatment of parking lot runoff. c. Currently private drainage from parking lots is by passing pre-treatment basins within the parking lot and discharging into the stormwater basins. Any private drainage must first be treated prior to discharge into a public stormwater basin. Environmental Memo Page 2 i. If private drainage cannot be treated prior to discharge the basins shall be privately maintained. 5. Storm sewer between town homes should discharge between the buildings into a swale before continuing west to the drainage swale and entering the storm basin. a. Creating water features between the buildings with native plantings and vegetation will provide a higher level of stormwater treatment and create “fingers of green” running through the site to enhance wildlife habitat. 6. The project should include expanded buffers adjacent to Wetland 1. A restoration and management plan should be developed for upland buffer areas consistent with pre-settlement vegetation. 7. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27. 8. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations. 9. Provide ESA classification and basic use designation for the 57 trees being removed. It appears that several of the trees will be larger than 12” in diameter and would require a 2:1 replacement planting. a. b. Plans show removal of 38 trees of which 30 are significant. Clarify total number of removals. c. On the removal plans add the tree identification number so we can correlate it with the tree inventory. Page 3 d. Coniferous trees are shown as measured by DBH, city standards measure coniferous trees by height. Please provide height measurements for all coniferous trees planned to be removed. 10. Plant additional “large” canopy trees on the backside of the proposed senior living building within the shoreland district. a. Increased heights of proposed building should include additional screening on the backside of the building to break up the outline from the lake. 11. Sheet C5.13 should include the species of trees proposed to be planted instead of large, medium, and small. a. Provide numbers for each species of tree to be planted. 12. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site-specific mixes for each location. a. Low maintenance and drought resistant species should be proposed throughout the development to reduce the need for irrigation. 13. 4” minimum of topsoil is required for final planting of all ground covers, seed, and sod. Soil shall be loosened and prepped to a minimum depth of 4” to reduce compaction and allow for root growth. 14. The proposed trail should make a loop in the open space area and run along ash street before connecting back into Wilkinson way. a. Currently the trail is proposed to dead end in the park/open space. Opportunities for additional trail exist throughout the park. Potentially linking the trail system through any future proposed bmp as part of the VLAWMO BMP study. 15. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals 16. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb should be proposed within the roadway to allow turtles access off the road for travel. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments – Wilkinson Waters PPP PP Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1.Complete the noise mitigation study and submit findings if any additional berming or screening is required. 2.Building setbacks to Wilkinson Lake as proposed should be maintained. 3.Work with planning and zoning on building heights. Currently building heights exceed the requirements for the shoreland district. a.Board recommends additional overstory planted adjacent to buildings that exceed the requirements for additional screening and sight lines. 4.Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a.Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. i.Water balance study is being conducted b.Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA i.Infiltration basins are shown for pretreatment of parking lot runoff. c.Currently private drainage from parking lots is by passing pre-treatment basins within the parking lot and discharging into the stormwater basins. Any private drainage must first be treated prior to discharge into a public stormwater basin. Environmental Memo Attachment 15. Environmental Board Memo Page 2 i. If private drainage cannot be treated prior to discharge the basins shall be privately maintained. 5. Storm sewer between town homes should discharge between the buildings into a swale before continuing west to the drainage swale and entering the storm basin. a. Creating water features between the buildings with native plantings and vegetation will provide a higher level of stormwater treatment and create “fingers of green” running through the site to enhance wildlife habitat. 6. The project should include expanded buffers adjacent to Wetland 1. A restoration and management plan should be developed for upland buffer areas consistent with pre-settlement vegetation. 7. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27. 8. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations. 9. Provide ESA classification and basic use designation for the 57 trees being removed. It appears that several of the trees will be larger than 12” in diameter and would require a 2:1 replacement planting. a. b. Plans show removal of 38 trees of which 30 are significant. Clarify total number of removals. c. On the removal plans add the tree identification number so we can correlate it with the tree inventory. Page 3 d. Coniferous trees are shown as measured by DBH, city standards measure coniferous trees by height. Please provide height measurements for all coniferous trees planned to be removed. 10. Plant additional “large” canopy trees on the backside of the proposed senior living building within the shoreland district. a. Increased heights of proposed building should include additional screening on the backside of the building to break up the outline from the lake. 11. Sheet C5.13 should include the species of trees proposed to be planted instead of large, medium, and small. a. Provide numbers for each species of tree to be planted. 12. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site-specific mixes for each location. a. Low maintenance and drought resistant species should be proposed throughout the development to reduce the need for irrigation. 13. 4” minimum of topsoil is required for final planting of all ground covers, seed, and sod. Soil shall be loosened and prepped to a minimum depth of 4” to reduce compaction and allow for root growth. 14. The proposed trail should make a loop in the open space area and run along ash street before connecting back into Wilkinson way. a. Currently the trail is proposed to dead end in the park/open space. Opportunities for additional trail exist throughout the park. Potentially linking the trail system through any future proposed bmp as part of the VLAWMO BMP study. 15. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals 16. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb should be proposed within the roadway to allow turtles access off the road for travel. Wilkinson Waters PUD Preliminary Plan Submittal 2/10/2025 Neighborhood Meeting Summary A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, February 4, 2025 from 4-6PM at the Jerome Room at 5959 Centerville Road, North Oaks. MN 55127. Residents within 600’ of the property were invited to attend and were notified via a direct mailing postcard to their addresses listed on Anoka County’s website. Attendees signed in and provided their addresses for reference. A short presentation was prepared to share the project with residents and comment cards were circulated to attendees. Questions and comments of the residents were answered at the event. After the event the presentation was emailed to attendees as requested. Attachments: 1. Mailer 2. Mailing List 3. Sign In Sheet 4. Presentation 5. Comment Card Responses Attachment 16. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Rapp Farm HOA 0 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Scott Armstrong 14 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Robert Braga Henson Tr 15 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Aaron Perkins 16 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Justin Messner 17 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Timothy Kappers Tr 18 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Sama Sandy 19 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Anne Mohns 20 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Francis Ngwa 22 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 Sabry Sharara 24 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks Homeowners Association 100 Village Center Drive Suite 240 North Oaks, MN 55127 Drake Properties LLC 1150 County Road J White Bear Township, MN 55127 County of Anoka 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Kevin Burns 1440 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 William R Shearen 1458 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Warren D Bachman, Sr 1487 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Lowel J Crandall Sander 1509 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Kelsey M Mallman 1557 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Lawrence M Hall 1565 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Carolyn M Ceronsky 1573 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Kent and Jeannine Lanz 1579 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Jerry A Wooodstrom 1591 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Alan and Natalie Sagdalen 1601 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Noelle Katherine Roden 1603 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Grove Brad & Jaworski M 1605 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Omar Molinos 1613 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 City of St. Paul 1900 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 Prebyterian Homes of North Oaks 2845 Hamline Avenue North Suite 200 Roseville, MN 55113 Schwing America Inc 5900 Centerville Road White Bear Township, MN 55128 Sara Rogalla 6063 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Roger Eddy 6097 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Victoria Eddy 6097 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Amy Donlin 6100 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Gallop Trustee, Debra A 6102 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Jennifer M Kasten 6151 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Thomas Stanley Laumeyer 6174 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Spirit Master Funding X LLC 6632 Telegraph Road Unit 193 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301 Gary D Wruck 6637 Marbella Lane Naples, FL 34105 Scott Hanson 12922 Keller Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 , 2/4/2025 1 WILKINSON WATERS Neighborhood Meeting February 4, 2025 Jerome Room 5959 Centerville Road North Oaks, MN 55127 Project Partners Land Owner ◦Lauren Grouws lauren@northoaks.com 651-484-3361 ◦Mark Houge mark@northoaks.com 651-484-3361 1 2 2/4/2025 2 2040 Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use/Signature Gateway (8-10 units/ac, up to 15 units/ac) High Density Residential (20-25 units/ac) Medium Density Residential (4-6 units/ac) ◦A Comprehensive Plan Amendment through the Metropolitan Council is required to blend the densities across the lots. County Road J, Centerville Road and 35E 3 4 2/4/2025 3 Wilkinson Waters Proposal 200 apartment units 40 townhome units (4-plexes) 100 senior living units Commercial/Retail Road, Sidewalks and Trails Water and Sewer Utilities Stormwater Treatment and Conveyance Stormwater Reuse for Irrigation Commercial/ Retail Senior Living Improvements ◦Sidewalk and trail amenities for public use ◦Road access ◦Increased tax dollars for the community ◦Water quality runoff improvements to Wilkinson Lake ◦Additional tree coverage ◦Utility trunk extensions to serve north in the future ◦High-end market rate apartments 5 6 2/4/2025 4 Project Schedule Apartment and Townhome Construction Entitlements Construction Road Work Environmental Assessment Concept Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plan August-October 2024 October 2024 - February 2025 February – April 2025 May – August 2025 Site Grading May – August 2025 Road and Utilities August - November 2025 Q3 2025 – Q4 2026 Country Road J/Centerville/35E Road Construction June 2025 – Q2 2026? Neighborhood Meeting Please provide comments and let’s stay connected! ◦Please provide your comments and questions on the project on one side of the notecard. ◦On the other, please provide your name, address, email and phone number (able to receive text messages) so that we can keep you updated on the project. 7 8 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND In 2022 the City Council authorized a partnership with the Rice Creek Watershed District to identify potential water quality improvements to reduce volume and sediment/nutrient loading to Rice Lake. Rice Lake is designated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as an impaired water. The study evaluated potential improvements to Shenandoah Park. A private ditch system maintained by the city runs through the park, under Birch Street, and discharges into Rice Lake. The ditch serves as the primary stormwater outlet for the residential neighborhood extending south to Coyote Trail. Most of the park area is comprised of partially drained wetland. Staff are of the opinion that the opportunity exists for a restoration project that would enhance water quality and provide an improved greenway element to the park. The City partnered with Rice Creek Watershed District to fund the final report, which was completed in December of 2022. The report included four alternatives of which two, options 3 and 4, were recommended by the Environmental Board for future consideration at the January 25th, 2023 meeting. Each of the concepts provided water quality and volume improvements, ecological restoration, and floodplain mitigation. Options for future trail connections were also evaluated. Due to the estimated cost of the projects, it was recommended that the City pursue grant funding through RCWD or other agencies. The City’s 5-year Capital Improvement Plan identified this project for implementation in 2025. The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) has established the Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant Program. The grant program allocates funding to each watershed area for allocation in a collaborative local process. City staff and RCWD have proposed the Shenandoah project for funding through this program. The City of Lino Lakes was selected as one of the projects moving forward as part of the grant program. The grant in the amount of $52,650 is to complete plans and specs for the above 2 referenced stormwater improvement project. Grants must be completed and signed no later than June 1, 2025. Grant documents should be available for final signature at the May 12, 2025 City Council meeting. Once the design is completed the City and RCWD will pursue additional construction funding through the program to complete the proposed project. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Project update, no action requited. ATTACHMENTS 1. Shenandoah Feasibility Study 2. Shenandoah Drainage Concept Plan Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report December 7, 2022 Prepared for: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 WSB PROJECT NO. 018901-000 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 2.0 Project Location ....................................................................................... 1 3.0 Site Description ....................................................................................... 1 4.0 Identification of Issues.............................................................................. 4 4.1 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL ............................................................ 4 4.2 Invasive/Nuisance Vegetation ................................................................. 4 4.3 Inefficient Use of Space ......................................................................... 4 4.4 Floodplain ............................................................................................ 4 5.0 Modeling Methodology .............................................................................. 5 6.0 Concept 1 ................................................................................................ 7 6.1 Modeling Results ................................................................................... 9 6.2 Construction Estimate ............................................................................ 9 6.3 Permit Table ........................................................................................ 10 7.0 Concept 2 ............................................................................................... 10 7.1 Modeling Results .................................................................................. 12 7.2 Construction Estimate ........................................................................... 12 7.3 Permit Table ........................................................................................ 13 8.0 Concept 3 ............................................................................................... 13 8.1 Modeling Results .................................................................................. 15 8.2 Construction Estimate ........................................................................... 15 8.3 Permit Table ........................................................................................ 16 9.0 Concept 4 ............................................................................................... 16 9.1 Modeling Results .................................................................................. 18 9.2 Construction Estimate ........................................................................... 18 9.3 Permit Table ........................................................................................ 19 10.0 Summary/Recommendation .................................................................... 19 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 1 1.0 Introduction This report provides the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) with a series of four (4) conceptual designs and associated water quantity and quality models for implementation of best management practices (BMPs) within Shenandoah Park. These designs address water quality within an aged part of the City of Lino Lakes’ stormwater conveyance system draining to Rice Lake (AUID 02- 0008-00) which was listed as impaired for nutrients (total phosphorous) in 2010. Shenandoah Park was identified as a location for the installation of BMP retrofits to improve stormwater quality and reduce the volume of stormwater runoff as part of the Rice Lake Subwatershed Stormwater Retrofit Assessment completed in 2010. While this assessment provided site specific information and load reductions, the assessment report indicated that additional modeling was required for the Shenandoah Park stormwater improvements. In addition to developing the conceptual designs discussed in this report, WSB also updated the existing InfoSWMM model used by RCWD, developed a P8 model, generated construction estimates for each of the four (4) concepts, and drafted a list of required permits from local, state, and federal entities. Through a series of meetings with City and Watershed District staff, WSB developed the four (4) concepts discussed in this report to meet the following goals: 1. Reduce total phosphorous (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) loading within the ditch system and to downstream waterbodies, specifically Rice Lake . 2. Enhance the amenities, aesthetics, and recreational opportunities within the park. 3. Increase floodplain volume within the subwatershed. 4. Restore and rehabilitate park vegetation that w ill provide wetland functional lift. 2.0 Project Location The proposed improvements are located within the City owned parcels for Shenandoah Park, in the southwestern corner of Lino Lakes. The street addresses for the parcels containing the proposed work are 4 75 Arrowhead Dr on the south and 498 Birch St on the north. The surrounding properties are either residential or public right of way, with the exception of an existing stormwater pond east of the park. The project location is within the watershed for Rice Lake, which is situated approximately 1,800 feet north of the park. 3.0 Site Description The project is proposed on City park property. Currently the southern portion of the site is largely mowed turfgrass with a play area to the east and a grove of trees to the north. Beyond this grove of trees, the majority of the site is vegetated with reed canary grass and nettle. A stormwater BMP was constructed in the upland northern portion of the project location to treat runoff from the reconstruction of Birch St in 2021. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 2 The site is relatively flat, with an elevation difference of approximately 4 feet across the areas of proposed work. A main feature of the site, and driver of this project, is a drainage ditch that flows across the site from south to north. The ditch c omes in from a culvert under Arrowhead Dr and takes multiple 90 degree turns, running north, east, north, west, and finally north to a culvert under Birch St. The channel is well vegetated and there don’t appear to be any major areas of slope failure or excessive erosion. The upstream culvert from Arrowhead Dr comes in at an elevation of 886.15 feet while the downstream culvert under Birch St has an elevation of 886.05 feet . The 0.1 foot elevation difference across the ditch means it functionally behaves as flat and the drainage in it is essentially ponded and draws down as such. A site visit in September 2022 was used to record the existing natural resources and vegetation conditions of the site. The land north of the east-west portion of the ditch within the project area consists of a Type 2 Fresh Wet Meadow wetland dominated by cattails, likely narrow -leaved (Typha angustifolia ). Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea ) is dominant along the ditch and banks. The land south of the east-west portion of the ditch within the project area is a Type 1/2 Seasonally Flooded/Fresh Wet Meadow wetland dominated by stinging nettle (Urtica dioica ). An Aster spp. was also observed in low abundance throughout the site. The southeast stretch of the ditch has native red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) along it in moderate density. Overall, the herbaceous layer within the project area has little diversity. A map of the delineated wetland is below. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 3 The very south end of the project area consists of a manicured turf area adjacent to a play structure. Just north of the play structure is an area of mounded soil (of an unknown origin) and mature tree growth. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 4 To the west of this mound is an area containing tree species typical of a transition zone such as aspen (Populus tremuloides). These trees are distressed and rotting. The west side of the turf area has large conifers that provide a screen from the adjacent residential home. Along the west edge of the project area are some existing box elder trees (Acer negundo) and silver maple (Acer saccharinum ) and other small to medium sized diverse trees in good condition. 4.0 Identification of Issues The project area is sited at the intersection of a number of issues facing the City and RCWD. The proposed improvements can be leveraged to address multiple problems at once, the solutions provided by the project will balance the needs of these issues and provide a well-rounded benefit. 4.1 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Many of the lakes connected by Rice Creek in Lino Lakes fall under a TMDL for excess nutrients. This includes a 2010 TMDL for Rice Lake, the receiving water downstream of the project location. This TMDL estimates a 68-80 percent reduction in TP loading to meet desired nutrient levels. This comes to an approximate reduction of over 9,300 pounds of TP. Much of this loading improvement may come from addressing upstream or internal phosphorous loading, however any reduction in TP is a net positive. As proposed, this project will result in a considerable reduction of TP loading to Rice Lake. 4.2 Invasive/Nuisance Vegetation The existing wetlands within the project area are domina ted by monotypic stands of cattails (likely invasive or hybrid) or stinging nettle with very low diversity and species richness. Along the ditch, invasive reed canary grass has prevented the growth of native vegetation. 4.3 Inefficient Use of Space The project space is currently very segmented, with the ditch, wetland, and park components separate from each other. There exists a great opportunity for a multifaceted approach at this site for water quality, ecological, floodplain, recreational, and educational benefits. However, these benefits are either not being realized or only realized on an individual basis as -is. One major issue outlined by the City is a lack of connection between the well- developed trail system to the south and the trail system along Birch St to the north. Connecting these systems would also allow for better pedestrian access through the City and help to achieve its planning goals. 4.4 Floodplain As the downstream end of a stormwater system serving over 200 acres of drainage area, the site has h igh potential for flooding. As modeled in existing conditions, the 100-year flood elevation is 892.15 feet. This high-water level approaches the lowest floor elevations of homes on Totem Trl. and Arrowhead Dr., putting these homes at risk of flooding. Prop osed project basins would lower this high -water level and decrease the risk of homes flooding. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 5 5.0 Modeling Methodology One of the major components of stormwater design for this project is hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. This consists of modeling to understand how much water is flowing through the site, what the peak rates and velocities of the flow reaches are, and how high flood levels will be. InfoSWMM software was used for this modeling in the project. RCWD has developed an InfoSWMM model for the project location and upstream stormwater infrastructure. A part of this project was updating the model based on City as -builts and stormwater system updates since its original creation. There were two existing ponds added to the model. BAL-012-A and an unnamed pond in Birchwood Acres Park. BAL-012-A was assumed to flow west to Baldwin Lake but based on City as -builts it actually outlets south to pond RLA-012-A and ultimately reaches Shenandoah Park and Rice Lake. The unnamed pond does not have as -built documents, so storage was estimated based on Anoka County LiDAR data flown in 2011. Another update to model existing conditions was a change to the outlet of the Shenandoah ditch under Birch St. The 36 inch RCP in the model was changed to reflect the 24 inch RCP that is there currently. Other smaller changes included updating basin storage based on as-built contours if available or 2011 LiDAR data otherwise. An overview map of the model area in question is below. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 6 InfoSWMM modeling was also generated for the proposed project improvements. This was done to understand the benefits to outflow rates and flood levels in the pond system that may be realized as a result of this project. Generally, it was found that adding storage d ownstream in Shenandoah Park resulted in flow rate decreases under Birch St and reductions in flood levels through the system. These flood Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 7 elevation reductions were greatest at the project location but decreased in effect for ponds further upstream. The other major component of stormwater design for this project was in water quality improvements. This modeling seeks to understand what pollutant loading and removals can be expected based on the watershed characteristics and stormwater basins in the system. P 8 software was used for water quality modeling. This involved creating an existing conditions P8 model from scratch as there was not one already generated for this drainage area. Pollutant loading was determined based on subwatershed areas and impervious surface fractions. Pollutant removals were determined based on pond as -built conditions. Under existing conditions, the drainage system upstream of the ditch removes nearly 22,500 lb of TSS and approximately 48.5 lb of TP each year. For proposed conditions, the P8 models were updated to include the proposed improvements with each concept. For the sake of water quality modeling, these BMPs were assumed to function as infiltration basins, where captured pollutant volumes are fully removed from the stormwater s ystem. Existing soils onsite are likely silty sands, providing an infiltration rate of approximately 0.45 in/hr based on the MN Stormwater Manual. However, based on past soil borings and County groundwater data, it is assumed inconsistent and minimal infiltration will be achievable in the basins due to the shallow depth of the water table in the area. Modeling conservatively assumed an infiltration rate of 0.01 in/hr, the minimum allowable in P8. Actual infiltration averaged over the year may be higher than this based on water table fluctuations. Additionally, P8 modeling does not factor in pollutant removals from evapotranspiration and vegetation uptake, both of which will be emphasized with proposed improvements. Therefore, it is likely that pollutant removals, TP in particular, will be higher than the results given but are difficult to quantify. The results of the modeling described above are summarized in the proposed concepts below. 6.0 Concept 1 Concept 1 is based directly on the proposed improvements from the 2010 Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment developed by the Anoka Conservation District. There are three wetland basins of roughly similar sizes that receive water from the ditch during medium to high flow events. Water is allowed to equalize between the basins and draws down very slowly over time via evapotranspiration and slow infiltration through the hydric soils. Captured water is kept in the basins after ditch levels draw down by virtue of one-way flap gates or duckbill valves on the inlets from the ditch. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 8 This system is not optimized for the full benefits that the site has to offer. It does not use all the space available that the City has to work with and does not provide any improvements to the ditch system. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 9 Construction Cost - Option 1 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,000 $10,000 ~10% of total budget COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 3000 $17.50 $52,500 Essentially all cut and removal from site RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets 12" RCP L F 190 $90 $17,100 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 2.00 $1,500 $3,000 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 2.00 $3,000 $6,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE L F 810 $3.50 $2,835 Need around grading + 40' to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 3000 $3 $9,000 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 1.4 $2,000 $2,800 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 24 $10 $240 Seeding over access road SEED MIX 34-261 LB 40 $75 $3,000 Seeding wetland/pond areas 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 60 $400 $24,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 20% Contingency $28,375 Total:$170,250 It does afford space for a pathway between the wetlands and educational interaction points. Concept 1 generally works , but can be improved upon to achieve the greatest site benefits. 6.1 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 758 4.21 891.43 0.72 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 1 shows the least benefits of all options due to its smaller basin footprint. 6.2 Construction Estimate The main driver of costs for all the provided concepts are excavation costs. Concept 1 calls for approximately 3000 cubic yards of excavation, driving about 50 percent of the construction costs. Other major costs include the construction of associated storm sewer and vegetation restoration across the site. T he total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $170,250. Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 10 6.3 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days 7.0 Concept 2 Concept 2 builds on the wetland basins described in Concept 1, but with an emphasis on maximizing water quality benefits. The proposed basins are maximized to fill as much of the available space and provide the largest area for evapotranspiration and infiltration. One-way inlets are again proposed to allow water to flow in from the ditch but prevent backflow once water levels draw back down in it. The ditch channel is not proposed to be shifted in this concept. This concept results in the greatest pollutant removal and increase in floodplain capacity. However, that comes at the cost of losing educational and recreational opportunities with the basins. In addition, maximizing basin volume does not provide much diversity in potential wetland improvements as much of it will consist of wet marsh conditions. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 11 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 12 Construction Cost - Option 2 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $20,000 $20,000 ~10% of total budget, slightly lower b/c simpler COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 14750 $17.50 $258,125 Essentially all cut and removal from site RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 10 $120.00 $1,200 For inlets 12" RCP L F 70 $90 $6,300 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 2.00 $1,500 $3,000 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 2.00 $3,000 $6,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE L F 1,060 $3.50 $3,710 Need around grading + 40' to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 3620 $3 $10,860 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 2.6 $2,000 $5,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 24 $10 $240 Seeding over access road, 120 lb/ac SEED MIX 34-261 LB 80 $75 $6,000 Seeding wetland/pond areas, 31.5 lb/ac 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 30 $400 $12,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 20% Contingency $68,327 Total:$409,962 7.1 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 1,416 9.05 891.28 0.87 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 2 shows the greatest benefits of all options due to its largest basin footprint. 7.2 Construction Estimate Again, the main driver of costs is excavation, even more so for this concept since basin size is maximized . Concept 2 calls for nearly 15,000 cubic yards of excavation, driving about 80 percent of the construction costs. As with Concept 1, other major costs include the construction of associated storm sewer and vegetation restoration across the site. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $410,000. Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenan ce. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 13 7.3 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days 8.0 Concept 3 Concept 3 involves the most holistic improvements for the project, providing benefits to water quality, floodplain management, site ecology, recreation, and education. There are four proposed basins of varying size and depth, providing a variety of wetland environments and water levels. As with the other concepts, water is proposed to enter the basins via one -way inlets. The larger bas ins are proposed to be of greater depth, allowing for increased water quality volumes to be treated and further reductions in flood elevations. Another major component of this concept is the realignment of the ditch channel through the park. The proposed channel would be approximately the same length, but follow a more natural and winding route instead of the sharp 90 degree turns, reducing drastic velocity changes and the associated potential erosion. Concept 3 would also allow for the playground area in the park to be more easily accessible to Arrowhead Trail and also potentially afford some parking spaces in the space freed up by the ditch realignment. The concept also has potential space for boardwalks or trails through much of the park, provid ing recreational and educational opportunities through the large and varying spaces of restored wetlands, and providing a pedestrian connection from Arrowhead Tr. to Birch St. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 14 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 15 Construction Cost - Option 3 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $30,000 $30,000 ~10% of total budget COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 12500 $17.50 $218,750 Essentially all cut and removal from site COMMON EMBANKMENT C Y 600 $17.50 $10,500 Fill old channel RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets 12" RCP L F 240 $90 $21,600 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 5.00 $1,500 $7,500 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 4.00 $3,000 $12,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE L F 400 $3.50 $1,400 Need around grading + 40' to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 9500 $3 $28,500 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 3.6 $2,000 $7,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 55 $10 $550 Seeding over access road and old channel, 120 lb/ac SEED MIX 34-261 LB 100 $75 $7,500 Seeding wetland/pond/channel areas, 31.5 lb/ac LIVE STAKES EACH 210 $3 $544 Stabilization along erosive edge of realigned ditch 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 55 $400 $22,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 20% Contingency $75,889 Total:$455,333 8.1 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 1,297 8.37 891.30 0.85 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 3 shows the slightly decreased benefits compared to Concept 2, but they are still significant. 8.2 Construction Estimate Excavation costs still dominate the estimate project total under this concept, but less so than Concept 2. 12,500 cubic yards of excavation are proposed, but this would be slightly offset with the proposed embankment volumes to fill in the old ditch channel. Earthwork estimates account for about 70 percent of total improvement costs. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $455,350. It should be noted the construction estimate does not include potential recreational improvements such as a boardwalk or trail. Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 16 8.3 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days 9.0 Concept 4 Concept 4 would consist of improvements largely focused on water quality benefits. Improvements would involve construction of an iron -enhanced sand filter (IESF) to treat the currently untreated runoff from Totem Tr., Hokah Dr., and Rice Ct., west of Shenandoah Park. This concept is proposed in conjunction with Concept 3, but it could also work in a modified capacity on its own or with Concept 1 or 2. All removals, floodplain benefits, and cost estimates factor in Concept 3 base elements and the IESF. As proposed, the IESF BMP would cover approximately 5,000 square feet with a basin bottom elevation of 887.4 feet . This elevation is based on a slightly raised invert of the outlet pipe for drainage coming off the roadway. Incoming stormwater would gravity flow through the filter media and outlet to the ditch via draintile. The manhole upstream of this outlet pipe is proposed with a 3 feet sump to provide pretreatment prior to flows reaching the IESF. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 17 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 18 9.1 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 5,688 19.75 891.30 0.85 The results above are based on the P8 modeling for this project. The IESF is proposed primarily for water quality benefits, as proposed it would have a negligible impact on floodplain volumes and water levels and therefore, they were unchanged from Concept 3. As shown in the results, this concept would greatly increase TSS and TP removals while taking up a relatively small footprint within the overall project area. Combined with Concept 3, TP removals are near 20 pounds per year. 9.2 Construction Estimate As with Concept 3, excavation costs still dominate the estimated project. Earthwork quantities are slightly increased with the proposed IESF, but its volume is much less than the other wetland basins. Other major costs include the specialized iron - enhanced filter media and replacement of storm sewer. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $601,000. Again, this construction estimate does not include potential recreational improvements such as a boardwalk or trail. Refer to the budget table at the end of this section for the base construction cost line item breakdown. Monitoring and maintenance of the site’s natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Current design standards assume an approximate 10-year lifespan for effective pollutant capture of an I ESF BMP. This lifespan can be extended with filter media replacement. The estimated cost of replacement is $45,000. This includes costs for removal of old media, installation of new iron-enhanced sand, and a 20 percent contingency. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 19 9.3 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act De Minimis Exemption and No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days 10.0 Summary/Recommendation All concepts described in this report provide improvements to the existing site vegetation, water quality, and floodplain levels. However, each concept strikes a difference balance of the above in addition to providing potential consideration to recreational benefits for residents on Lino Lakes. The site stormwater benefits are summarized for consideration in the table below. Construction Cost - Option 4 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 ~10% of total budget COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 13000 $17.50 $227,500 Essentially all cut and removal from site COMMON EMBANKMENT C Y 850 $17.50 $14,875 Berm and old channel fill SELECT GRANULAR BORROW C Y 100 $30.00 $3,000 Filter sand FILTER MEDIA SPECIAL C Y 170 $175.00 $29,750 5% by weight iron enhanced sand RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 30 $120.00 $3,600 For inlets/outlets 6" PERF HDPE PIPE LF 250 $24.00 $6,000 BMP underdrain 6" PERF HDPE PIPE CLEANOUT EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000 Underdrain cleanout 12" RCP L F 250 $90 $22,500 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 6 $1,500 $9,000 Based on OneOffice 30" RCP L F 148 $150.00 $22,200 Based on OneOffice, replace pipe from Totem 30" RCP APRON EACH 1 $2,500 $2,500 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 4 $3,000 $12,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate 48" OCS EACH 1 $7,500 $7,500 Based on OneOffice, IESF outlet 60" MH L F 7 $1,000 $7,000 Based on OneOffice, replace in Totem GEOTEXTILE FABRIC S Y 800.00 $3 $2,400 Between IE sand and regular sand STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE L F 900 $3.50 $3,150 Around filter and downstream of grading EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 10000 $3 $30,000 Placed on graded slopes SEEDING ACRE 3.6 $2,000 $7,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 55 $10 $550 Seeding over access road and old channel, 120 SEED MIX 34-261 LB 100 $75 $7,500 Seeding wetland/pond/channel areas, 31.5 lb/ac LIVE STAKES EACH 210 $3 $544 Stabilization along erosive edge of realigned ditch 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 55 $400 $22,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 20% Contingency $100,154 Total:$600,923 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 20 BMP Option Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Existing 892.15 N/A N/A N/A Concept 1 891.44 0.72 758 4.21 Concept 2 891.29 0.87 1,416 9.05 Concept 3 891.31 0.85 1,297 8.37 Concept 4 891.31 0.85 5,688 19.75 A major component of assessing BMP cost efficiency is the estimated cost divided by the provided pounds of TP removal. The proposed improvements were evaluated with a 25-year lifespan. Costs over the lifetime included full construction cost, 5 years of vegetation maintenance, annual BMP maintenance, and any major maintenance costs. These costs and the price per pound of TP are summarized in the table below. BMP Option Annual TP Removal (lb) Construction Cost 5-year Vegetation Maintenance Cost Annual BMP Maintenance Cost Major O&M Cost 25-year Cost/Pound TP Concept 1 4.21 $170,250 $42,880 $100 $0 $2,049 Concept 2 9.05 $410,000 $42,880 $200 $0 $2,024 Concept 3 8.37 $455,350 $42,880 $200 $0 $2,405 Concept 4 19.75 $601,000 $42,880 $300 $45,000 $1,410 All concepts proposed provide improvements in varying degrees. Concept 1 provides lower benefits but comes at a lower cost and would entail a smaller amount of disturbance to existing site conditions. Concept 2 maximizes basin size and associated pollutant removals, but at an increased cost and with no broader improvements to the park. Concept 3 provides large basin sizes, ditch realignment similar to a natural channel, and potential recreational benefits, but with a greater cost and major site disturbance. Concept 4 provides similar benefits in addition to the best cost per pound of TP removal, but at a significant upfront cost and higher long term maintenance needs. This report recommends the City consider the improvements in Concept 4. The proposed work w ould allow for high degrees of wetland improvements in large basins that would also serve to reduce flood levels. Ditch realignment would further serve to enhance these natural resources benefits while also providing options for a greenway trail system and educational opportunities around the merits of stormwater treatment and wetland ecosystems. Finally, the proposed IESF would provide exceptional pollutant treatment and the best price per pound of TP removed. With the wide degree of benefits and greatest price-quantified water quality improvement, Concept 4 would also be a strong candidate to receive grant funding to help the City offset its construction costs. However, WSB will be happy to support the City in pursuing further design of any concept proposed. K: \ 0 1 8 9 0 1 - 0 0 0 \ G r a p h i c s \ 0 1 8 9 0 1 - 0 0 0 S h e n a n d o a h Shenandoah Drainage Concept Plan Lino Lakes, MN September 15, 2023 | WSB Project number: 018901-000 Scale in Feet 0’100’50’25’ ARROWHEAD DRIVE TO T E M T R A I L BIRCH STREET RICE C T HOKAH D R PROPOSED HIGH WATER LEVEL ELEVATION 891.31 WETLAND BASIN (TYP) COUNTY STORM WATER BASIN PROPOSED CHANNEL ROUTE EXISTING POND EXISTING PLAY AREA SHENANDOAH PARK IRON ENHANCED SAND FILTER TRAIL TRAIL BOARDWALK CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Birchwood Acres Pond Treatment Background Staff has received feedback from concerned residents regarding the aesthetic quality of storm pond RLA-010-B located in Birchwood Acres Park. This pond treats stormwater runoff from nearly 70 properties located primarily on Hawthorn Road and Lonesome Pine Trail in the Park Grove development. Communication has gone back several years to deal with concerns of vegetation, smell, and stormwater management. The main concerns include the vegetation that covers the surface of the pond and odor. The vegetation present on this pond is primarily duckweed, which provides water purification by incorporating nutrients. It is also an important food source for wildlife. The odor is primarily due to decomposition of plants and algae. In response to residents’ concerns, city staff took steps to ensure the pond was functioning properly. The city also initiated water quality sampling to check phosphorous levels in September of 2020. The phosphorous detected was at levels typical for stormwater ponds. The pond was also surveyed in July of 2021 to determine its functionality in terms of stormwater management. The survey and associated analysis found that the pond is functional and does not require additional maintenance at this time. The maintenance recommendation from WSB, the City’s Engineer, was to maintain this pond at its current level. The inlet and outlet structures were deemed functional and not in need of additional maintenance at this time. Staff provided residents with other alternatives to improve water quality and aesthetics of the pond. 1. Good landscaping and yard care habits remain the best tool at the residents’ disposal to limit pollutant loading in the pond. These practices include limiting fertilizer use in lawns, cleaning up after pets, washing vehicles on the lawn rather than the driveway, reducing deicing salt use, and preventing grass and leaves from entering the stormwater system. Most residents living with back yards abutting the pond do have some vegetative buffers in place, which should help limit nutrients from the closest back yards from reaching the lake 2. Mechanical removal of vegetation would involve the physical removal of vegetation with a skimming device or nets. This would remove some of the nutrients from the pond, and it would have similar results to herbicide and algaecide application without the negative impacts associated with chemical use. Residents have expressed interest in treating this pond, citing the aesthetic quality of two ponds on private land nearby that receive treatments with algaecide and herbicide. These are storm pond RLA-013-A, located south of the Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, and an unnamed pond located directly north of Birchwood Acres Park ballfield. Residents have petitioned 100% of the adjacent private property of the pond and agreed to share in the cost of treatments privately. There would be no cost to the city for the residents to privately treat the pond. They have received a proposal from Lake Management, Inc. to complete the treatment. The proposal is attached. ANALYSIS The City of Lino Lakes is permitted as a Municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). In order to discharge stormwater into the storm sewer system and ultimately into surface waters the city is required to meet six minimum control measures (MCM). MCM 5 requires post construction stormwater management. This relates to the water entering the storm sewer and being treated by city bmp’s or in this case stormwater ponds. Stormwater ponds are designed to capture sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants to settle them out of the water column before discharging to adjacent wetlands, lakes, and streams. Stormwater ponds contain nutrients and through plant growth helps to absorb the phosphorus. This is typical of stormwater ponds and an indication that the pond is performing as intended and capturing pollutants that would otherwise reach surface waters. The concern of treating a city owned pond is that the treatment could have a negative impact of the stormwater leaving the pond. This could lead to pollution and sedimentation downstream. The city would be liable for any impacts caused by the treatment to the cities stormwater management system. Requested Council Direction Discussion Attachments 1. Project Location 2. Petition on signatures 3. Letter to residents 4. Proposal Pond at Birchwood Park – List of Residents Karen Jamison & Gunilla Ekeling 526 Linden Lane KJAMI@comcast.net 651-231-4712 Jim & Cindy Sandberg 530 Linden Lane JJSandberg@q.com ? Leo & Jean Dehmer 534 Linden Lane Leo_Dehmer@hotmail.com 651-769-4215 Robert & Mary Olson 538 Linden Lane bertmaryolson@comcast.net 651-486-9892 Aleksey Kurdyumov 542 Linden Lane ALKurdyumov@gmail.com 651-793-8053 Hope & Kim Kuck 546 Linden Lane kimskuck@gmail.com ? Shelly Stetson 550 Linden Lane liveformypatio@yahoo.com 612-859-1833 Jim and Cathey Schorzmann 552 Linden Lane waldo55014@yahoo.com 651-366-7002 John Gray 556 Lonesome Pine Trail ? 651-414-0933 Tom & Julie Cutts 560 Lonesome Pine Trail trcutts@gmail.com 612-655-5575 Curt & Mary Sell 564 Lonesome Pine Trail mkaysell@msn.com 612-802-0877 Pat & Kathy Huelman 570 Lonesome Pine Trail phuelman@umn.edu 651-484-1427 Memorandum To: Residents Near Birchwood Acres Pond From: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator Date: 5/16/22 Re: Birchwood Acres Pond Stormwater ponds are designed to provide water quality and water quantity treatment for stormwater runoff to prevent pollutants from reaching lakes, rivers, and streams. When these ponds are first constructed, the water will be relatively clear because there are initially few pollutants. As fertilizer, salt, pet waste, and other pollutants accumulate over time, the ponds can become green and may have an odor. This is typical of stormwater ponds and an indication that the pond is performing as intended and capturing pollutants that would otherwise head to surface waters. City staff have received feedback from concerned residents regarding the aesthetic quality of storm pond RLA-010-B located in Birchwood Acres Park. This pond treats stormwater runoff from nearly 70 properties located primarily on Hawthorn Road and Lonesome Pine Trail in the Park Grove development. The main concerns include the vegetation that covers the surface of the pond and odor. The vegetation present on this pond is primarily duckweed, which provides water purification by incorporating nutrients. It is also an important food source for wildlife. The odor is primarily due to decomposition of plants and algae. In response to residents’ concerns, city staff took steps to ensure the pond was functioning properly. The city also initiated water quality sampling to check phosphorous levels in September of 2020. The phosphorous detected was at levels typical for stormwater ponds. The pond was also surveyed in July of 2021 to determine its functionality in terms of stormwater management. The survey and associated analysis found that the pond is functional and does not require additional maintenance at this time. The maintenance recommendation from WSB, the City’s Engineer, was to maintain this pond at its current level. The inlet and outlet structures were deemed functional and not in need of additional maintenance at this time. Residents have expressed interest in treating this pond, citing the aesthetic quality of two ponds on private land nearby that receive treatments with algaecide and herbicide. These are storm pond RLA-013-A, located south of the Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, and an unnamed pond located directly north of Birchwood Acres Park ballfield. Staff is not in favor of chemical treatment of the pond for the following reasons: 1. Copper is a common component of many chemicals used to treat ponds. When copper accumulates in sediment it may have to be disposed of at a landfill, which increases cost to the city. 2. Herbicides and algaecides have negative impacts on wildlife. Even if acute toxicity may be limited for certain chemicals, chronic, long-term wildlife impacts are more uncertain. 3. The treatments do not reduce the pollutant load in the stormwater ponds. Stormwater management function of ponds is not improved through algaecide/herbicide treatments. 4. The plants that grow in these ponds are incorporating pollutants, such as phosphorous, into their tissues. To kill these plants would eliminate the positive water purification impact. Staff have provided a few options that residents could undertake to improve the aesthetics of the pond: 1. Good landscaping and yard care habits remain the best tool at the residents’ disposal to limit pollutant loading in the pond. These practices include limiting fertilizer use in lawns, cleaning up after pets, washing vehicles on the lawn rather than the driveway, reducing deicing salt use, and preventing grass and leaves from entering the stormwater system. Most residents living with back yards abutting the pond do have some vegetative buffers in place, which should help limit nutrients from the closest back yards from reaching the lake. 2. Install an aerator to improve circulation of water and aid decomposition of organic matter. 3. Mechanical removal of vegetation would involve the physical removal of vegetation with a skimming device or nets. This would remove some of the nutrients from the pond, and it would have similar results to herbicide and algaecide application without the negative impacts associated with chemical use. If residents are still interested in chemical treatments of this pond, this may be an option on a pilot basis, pending City Council approval, given the following conditions: 1. Treatments will be 100% funded by residents choosing to participate. 2. A majority of residents abutting the pond must be in agreement. If residents are in favor of pursuing the option of chemical treatments, please send a form with signatures of all residents who are in favor to: Andy Nelson Environmental Coordinator ANelson3@linolakes.us LAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. Minnesota Operations 10400 185th Street North Marine on St. Croix, MN 55047 (651) 433-3283 Phone Fax # (651) 433-5316 Email: info@lakemanagementinc.com PROPOSAL FOR AQUATIC NUISANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2025 Submitted to: Date: September 11, 2024 Mary Sell 564 Lonesome Pine Trail Phone: (612) 802-0877 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Email: mkaysell@msn.com Lake Management, Inc. proposes to furnish at its expense, all of the necessary materials, subject to state and federal regulations, equipment and labor as well as to direct and administer treatment as needed for the control of the excessive growth of submerged and floating aquatic weeds and algae in the water area described as follows: 2025 Aquatic Management Program – Pond (2.5a) located at 564 Lonesome Pine Trail, Lino Lakes, MN Seasonal Maintenance Program…………………………………………………………….$2,038.00 Two-week inspection/application intervals, mid-May through mid-September. Includes phosphorus binding applications for nutrient reduction. Bio-augmentation applications included for sediment reduction and water clarity. Aquatic colorants/dyes included and applied upon request. Lake Management uses only EPA approved, Minnesota DNR allowed products. In consideration of the goods and materials furnished, use of equipment and services rendered, payment is to be: Two Thousand Thirty-Eight and 00/100 Dollars ($2,038.00) Terms: Net April 1, 2025 Note: Our seasonal contract begins approximately May 15th and ends September 15th. If applications are required outside of seasonal contract dates or an additional treatment is requested, a minimum $249.00 charge may apply. Questions about our program or special requests should be directed to: Mike O’Connell at (651) 433-3283. In rare cases, large amounts of decomposing algae could cause a reduction in dissolved oxygen, placing fish at risk. While loss of fish is extremely rare, Lake Management Inc. cannot be responsible for such an occurrence. Please notify Lake Management if fish are present. Lake Management, Inc. carries insurance for both liability and property damage and workers’ compensation and will, upon request, confirm that coverage by certificates issued to the customer. This proposal may be withdrawn by Lake Management, Inc. if not accepted within 30 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above payment and conditions are satisfactory and are accepted. Lake Management, Inc. is authorized to conduct the management program described above. Payment will be made as indicated above. Signature Date Representing 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: I-35E & CR J Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND Ramsey County is preparing to solicit bids and award a contract for the improvements for I- 35E/CR J interchange improvements. The overall project cost is estimated at $23,761,410.60. Federal funds are available for the Project and are capped at $19,000,000.00. The City’s share of the proposed improvements is $318,509.60. This includes pro rata share of right-of-way, drainage, utility and roadway improvements. The City’s share is funded primarily from Municipal State Aid Street funds with a small portion of funding from the Area and Unit Trunk Utility funds. Area and Unit funds will be reimbursed from developer fees charged with development of the northwest quadrant of the Centerville Road/CRJ intersection. Under the terms of the agreement the City is responsible for maintenance of the storm water pond in the NE quadrant of Centerville Road/CRJ intersection, the cost of which is split between City and Ramsey County based on contributing area. Lino Lakes will also be responsible for the trail on the west side of Centerville Road along with the crosswalk pavement markings on City streets, if applicable. The City will be responsible for maintenance of Centerville Road/CRJ roundabout. Staff is still reviewing responsibilities with maintenance of the interchange roundabouts and street lighting. The City will be entering into the agreement with Anoka County. Anoka County and Ramsey County will have a master agreement in place covering the overall project costs. Landscaping improvements to the Centerville/CRJ roundabout are in addition to these costs. The portion of the project will likely be bid in 2026. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Council direction to place approval of the JPA on the May 12, 2025 meeting agenda pending resolution of the interchange roundabout and street lighting maintenance and electric costs. 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft JPA Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 1 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY (CSAH) 21 (CENTERVILLE ROAD), CSAH 54 (20TH AVE S) AND COUNTY ROAD 84 (OTTER LAKE ROAD) AS PART OF THE COUNTY J AND I-35E INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN Minnesota Department of Transportation SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47 Ramsey County Project Nos. SP 062-601-017 and SP 062-659-020 Anoka County Project Nos. SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005 and SP 210-020-015 THIS AGREEMENT is made by the parties on the last date executed below, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, hereinafter referred to as "City". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement agree it is in the best interest of the traveling public to reconstruct CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Ave S) and CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) as part of the County Road J and I-35E interchange project led by Ramsey County and, WHEREAS, said parties mutually agree that CSAH 21, CSAH 54 and CR 84 are in need of reconstruction; and, WHEREAS, Ramsey County as the lead agency of the County Road J and I-35Interchange project has prepared preliminary design plans for the reconstruction of CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Avenue S.) and CR84 (Otter Lake Road) in accordance with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards to a staff approved layout condition; and, WHEREAS, Anoka County has jurisdiction over CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Avenue S.) and CR86 (Otter Lake Road) and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be shared; and, WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions of the state to enter into joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: I. PURPOSE The parties have joined together for the purpose of reconstructing the roadway, drainage and trail as well as other utilities for County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) from Centerville Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 51/Anoka County State Aid Highway 21) to Otter Lake Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 60/Anoka County Road 84) including the I-35E interchange and intersection of County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) and 20th Avenue South (Anoka Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 2 County State Aid Highway 54). The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) state project numbers are SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47; the Ramsey County project numbers are SP 062-601-017, SP 062-659-020; the Anoka County project numbers are SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005 and the Lino Lakes project number is SP 210-020-015 (collectively the “Project”). Said engineering plans are filed in the office of the Ramsey County Public Works Department and Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference. The parties to this Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) agree in principle that the Project is in the best interest of the traveling public and that the Construction Plan Title Sheet as shown in Exhibit "A" defines the final design of the Project. All Exhibits attached to or referred to in this JPA are incorporated by reference and made part of this Agreement. II. METHOD Ramsey County as lead agency for the project shall cause the construction of State Project number SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47 Anoka County Project CP21-15-00, SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005, Ramsey County Project SP 062-601-017 and 062-659-020 and City project number SP 210-020-015. IMPROVEMENTS: It is agreed by the parties that in 2025/2026, County Road J will be reconstructed from Centerville Road (Anoka County State Aid Highway 21, Ramsey County State Aid Highway 59) to Otter Lake Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 60/Anoka County Road 84)including the I-35E interchange and intersection of County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) and 20th Avenue South (Anoka County State Aid Highway 54), as shown in "Exhibit A". Improvements include, but are not limited to: roadway widening, roundabout construction, bridge construction, concrete median, storm sewer and associated ponding, turn lanes, shoulders, lighting, bituminous trails, retaining walls and concrete curb & gutter. . INTERSECTIONS: As agreed by the parties, improvements to the following intersections have been incorporated in the Exhibit "A" design: Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 60 / Anoka County Road 84 / I-35E east ramps: Roundabout Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 54 / I-35E west ramps: Roundabout Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Ramsey County State Aid Highway 59 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 21 /: Roundabout RIGHT OF WAY: The parties agree that the County will acquire all necessary right-of-way and easements for the Project. Acquisition of any additional right-of-way and/or easements needed for improvements to the city street Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 3 intersections beyond what is defined in the Exhibit “A” Layout will be the responsibility of the city. It is agreed by the parties that all necessary right of way and easements will be in legal possession of the County lead agency prior to acceptance of bids for the project. Any City owned property or easements required for the construction will be conveyed to the County at no cost. DRAINAGE: The City shall pay for a percentage of the cost of the storm sewer system, including the detention basins and their outlet structures. The city portion of the cost is based on contributing flow through the storm sewer system to the detention basin determined by contributing area. The City of Lino Lakes shall pay Anoka County for a portion of the costs of the areas in the properties acquired by Anoka County specifically for ponding for the project, the costs will be determined based on contributing flows at the following percentages for the Centerville Pond Property. Contributing Flow Percentage: Anoka County 40%, Lino Lakes 7%, Ramsey County 53% Anoka County: $126,829.18 Lino Lakes: $22,195.11 Ramsey County: $168,048.66 SIDEWALK: The parties agree that the construction of the sidewalk along the west side of Centerville Road (CSAH 21) and within the Roundabout in the Anoka County side of the intersection is eligible for federal funds and that the City will be responsible for the local match in areas where no sidewalk exists, and the County will be responsible for the local match where a sidewalk currently exists. This sidewalk location has been agreed to by the city. The parties understand that the cost for the sidewalk includes concrete surfacing, aggregate base, excavation (including muck excavation), borrow material (granular and topsoil), and turf establishment. TRAFFIC CONTROL: The parties understand and agree that portions of CSAH 21 will be closed to thru traffic during construction. The parties agree and understand the cost share for traffic control for the city shall be a prorated share based on the city project cost divided by the total project cost. III. COSTS The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work, shall constitute the “actual construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated construction costs" are good faith projections of the costs, which will be incurred for this project. Actual costs will vary and those will be the costs for which the relevant parties will be responsible. The estimated construction cost of the total project is $23,761,410.60. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 4 Federal funds available for the Project are capped at $19,000,000.00. The federal funds shall be split based on the ratio of eligible cost incurred by each party to the total eligible project cost. Eligible costs are the costs of items that can participate in federal funding as shown on Exhibit B. Any overruns in quantities beyond the federal funds will be charged to the local entities who are contributing to that portion of the project. After federal funding percentage is applied, the cost to the city for their share of the construction items of the Project is $274,365.27 The City participation in construction engineering will be at a rate of eight percent (8%) of their designated construction share of $274,365.27. The estimated cost to the City for construction engineering is $21,949,22. The total construction cost to the city after federal funds have been applied including construction engineering is $296,314.49 In summary, the total Lino Lakes Cost share of this project is $318,509.60 (Includes construction and Lino Lakes contribution for ponding properties in Anoka County) Upon award of the contract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, ninety five percent (95%) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $302,584.12 Prior to billing, this estimate will be updated by the County to reflect the actual bid prices as awarded. An updated cost estimate shall be provided to the City at the time of billing. The City's share of the cost of the project shall include only construction and construction engineering expense and does not include engineering design and administrative expenses incurred by the County. After final completion of the project, the City's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. If necessary, adjustments to the initial ninety five percent (95%) charged will be made in the form of credit or additional charges to the City's share. Also, the remaining five percent (5%) of the City's portion of the construction costs shall be paid at that time. The County agrees to submit to the city for review final quantities and cost within one year of project substantial completion. IV. TERM / TERMINATION This Agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution and will remain in effect until the Project and all restoration activities are completed, with exception of the ownership and maintenance provisions within this Agreement which shall continue indefinitely. V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County in conformance to the State laws. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 5 VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and shall be made upon request by either party. Prior to city payment to the County, Anoka County shall provide the City a copy of all cost participation documents submitted to MnDOT State Aid to assist the city in their application for MSA funding. IX. MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance of the completed watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer (except catch basins and catch basin leads), and detention basins (including ponds and their outlet structures and grit chambers/collectors) shall be the sole obligation of the City. a. The City shall maintain the components of the storm sewer system. b. The cost for maintenance of trunk line outfalls and BMPs shall be distributed as follows: Centerville Wet Pond, City of Lino Lakes 47 %, Ramsey County 53 %, MnDOT 0%. c. The City of Lino Lakes shall notify Anoka County and Ramsey County of upcoming maintenance one year in advance to allow for proper notice and budgeting to Ramsey County. d. Within 30 days of completion of the maintenance, submit invoices to Ramsey County setting forth the share of the maintenance expense. Which invoice shall be paid within 30 days of submission. B. Maintenance of the bituminous trail on the west side of CSAH 21 shall be the responsibility of the City. The City shall be responsible for general routine maintenance, such as sweeping, clearing, plowing, trash removal and other incidental items. C. Maintenance of crosswalk pavement markings shall be the responsibility of the City and the County. The County will be responsible for the maintenance of the crosswalk pavement marking for the crossings at the Roundabout intersections. The City will be responsible for all crosswalk pavement markings for any trail/sidewalk crossings at all city streets. D. Maintenance of streetlights, including Roundabout lights and cost of electrical power to the streetlights shall be the sole obligation of the City. The City will be responsible for long-term maintenance and replacement of the complete street light system including items such as: poles, fixtures, luminaires, and control cabinets. E. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance and up-keep of the center islands located within the roundabout(s). X. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices herein, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, on behalf of the County, and to the City Administrator of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, on behalf of the City. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 6 XI. INDEMNIFICATION The City and County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. XIII. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By: By: Jim Dickinson Rob Rafferty County Administrator Mayor Dated: By: David Pecchia Interim City Administrator Dated: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Joseph J. MacPherson, P.E. Transportation Division Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: By: By: Christine V. Carney First Name Last Name Assistant County Attorney City Attorney Dated: Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 8 EXHIBIT “A” Project Title Sheet Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 9 EXHIBIT “B” Cost Distribution Spreadsheet Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 10 EXHIBIT “C” FOR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED IN ANOKA COUNTY ITEMS COUNTY SHARE CITY SHARE Concrete Curb & Gutter 50% 50% Concrete Curb & Gutter for Median and Center Island Construction 100% 0% Concrete Median 100% 0*1 Concrete Sidewalk 0% 100% Concrete Sidewalk Replacement 100% 0% Bikeways 0% 100% Bikeway Replacement 100%, 0% Unless existing trail not placed at edge of R/W Construction or Adjustment of Local Utilities 0% 100% Grading, Base and Bituminous 100% 0% Storm Sewer based on state aid letter*2 based on state aid letter*2 Driveway Upgrades 100%, in-kind 100%, of up-grades Traffic Signals, new (communities larger than 5,000) ½ the cost of its the cost of its legs of w/ State Aid approved SJR legs of the intersection the intersection plus ½ the cost of the County legs of the intersection Traffic Signals, replacement (communities larger than 5,000) the cost of its legs of the cost of its legs of w/ State Aid approved SJR the intersection the intersection Traffic Signals, new & replacements (communities less than 5,000) 100% 0% w/ State Aid approved SJR Traffic Signal, w/o State Aid approved SJR 0% 100% EVP 0% 100% Engineering Services *3 *3 Right-of-Way 100%*4 0% Street Lights 0% 100% Noise Walls 100%, if not previously notified*5 100%, if previously notified*5 *1 The County pays for 100% of Standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a local unit of government requests decorative median such as brick, stamped concrete, or landscaping, the local unit will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard median. *2 In the event no State Aid is being used, or in the event the state aid letter does not determine cost split percentages, drainage cost shares will be computed by the proportion of contributing flow outside the County right of way to the total contributing flow. *3 Engineering shall be paid by the Lead Agency except that any participating agency will pay construction engineering in the amount of 8% of the construction costs paid by that agency. *4 In the event that the Township or City requests purchase of right-of-way in excess of those right-of-ways required by County construction, the Township or City participates to the extent an agreement can be reached in these properties. For instance, a Township or City may request a sidewalk be constructed alongside a County roadway which would require additional right-of-way, in which case the Township or City may pay for that portion of the right-of-way. Acquisition of right-of-way for new alignments shall be the responsibility of the Township or City in which the alignment is located. This provision may be waived by agreement with the County Board if the roadway replaces an existing alignment and the local unit of government takes jurisdiction of that existing alignment. In addition, any costs, including right-of-way costs, incurred by the County because a Township or City did not acquire sufficient right-of-way during the platting process or redevelopment process as requested by the County shall be paid by the Township or City. *5 Notification includes any letter to the agency indicating that noise will potentially be an issue in the future, likely received during the Plat Review Process. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the agency paying for the initial installation. When the County is the responsible agency, it shall pay 100% of Standard Noise Wall Cost. If a local agency requests decorative noise walls, the requesting agency will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard noise wall. 1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 9 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Special Assessment Senior Citizen Deferral ______________________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND Minnesota Statutes Chapter 435.193 allows cities to provide a hardship assessment deferral provided standards are adopted establishing guidelines for determining the existence of hardship. City Code section 303.10 allows for the City Council to defer payment of special assessments on homestead property owned by a person that is 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of permanent and total disability. The deferment is subject to certain income- related conditions. To be eligible a property owner must meet the following income-related requirements: 1) The owner’s shall not have an annual gross income in excess of Section 8, low-income limits in effect at the time of the application. This number is set annually for the metro area. 2) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have gross assets (excluding the homestead property) in excess of $50,000. 3) The Assessor’s Market Value of the applicant’s homestead parcel shall not exceed $60,000. Items 2 & 3 above have not been adjusted since 1983. The code allows for the Council, on the recommendation of the City Administrator, to adjust the asset and market value requirements by motion. However, staff are proposing deletion of the gross assets and market value requirements. This would leave the low-income limits that are regionally established each year ($78,250 for a two-person household). Alternatively, some cities use a formula determination based on the annual assessment amount as a percentage of annual gross income. For example, the hardship determination could be established when the annual assessment rate exceeds 2% of total adjusted gross incomes. This would allow for a more flexible policy based on assessment amounts. 2 REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff is requesting Council direction to prepare an amendment to City Code Section 303.10 for consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Code section 303.10 § 303.10 DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. (1) The Council may defer the payment of any special assessments on homestead property owned by a person who is 65 years of age or older, or who is retired by virtue of permanent and total disability, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record the deferment of special assessments where the following conditions are met; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the determination of such a hardship on the basis of exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by these standards and guidelines where the determination made by the City Council in a nondiscriminatory manner will give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants: (a) Any applicant must be 65 years of age or older, or retired by virtue of permanent and total disability, and must own a legal or equitable interest in the property applied for which must be the homestead of the applicant. (b) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have an annual gross income in excess of the Section 8, low income limits in effect at the time of the application (as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development). Income specified in the application should be the income of the year preceding the year in which the application is made, or the average income of the three years prior to the year in which the application is made. (c) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have gross assets (excluding the homestead property) in excess of $50,000. (d) The Assessor’s Market Value of the applicant’s homestead parcel shall not exceed $60,000. (e) The limitations on an applicant’s assets and property market value may be adjusted on an annual basis upon recommendation of the City Administrator and motion of the City Council. (f) Unless otherwise provided under the resolution adopting the assessment, all such deferred assessments shall bear interest at the rate of two percent above the city’s borrowing rate. (g) This procedure shall not apply to any assessment of $100 or less. (2) The deferment shall be granted for as long a period of time as the hardship exists and the conditions as aforementioned have been met. However, it shall be the duty of the applicant to notify the City Clerk of any change in his status that would affect eligibility for deferment. (3) The entire amount of deferred special assessments shall be due within 60 days after the loss of eligibility by the applicant. If the special assessment is not paid within 60 days, the City Clerk shall add thereto interest at two percent above the city’s borrowing rate from date assessments were adopted through December 31 of the following year and the total amount of principal and interest shall be certified to the County Auditor for collection with taxes the following year. Should the applicant plead and prove, to the satisfaction of the Council, that full repayment of the deferred special assessment would cause the applicant particular undue hardship, the Council may order that the applicant pay within 60 days a sum equal to the number of installments of deferred special assessments outstanding and unpaid to date (including principal and interest) with the balance thereafter paid according to the terms and condition of the original special assessment. (4) The option to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due upon the occurrence of any one of the following: (a) The death of the owner when there is no spouse who is eligible for deferment. (b) The sale, transfer or subdivision of all or any part of the property. (c) Loss of homestead status on the property. (d) Determination by the Council for any reason that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. (5) Notice of the special assessment deferral shall be filed by the City Clerk with the Anoka County Recorder as provided by law. Failure to record such notice, however, shall not affect the validity of the special assessments. (6) Any person, firm, entity or corporation who shall provide false information in application for a deferral under this provision or shall violate any term or condition contained herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor as defined by state law. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Item 10 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Liquor License Fees ______________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Business license renewal time is approaching, and the City has received a request from a local restaurant to split the payment of the annual license fee. The City Attorney has advised that the City Council can provide consensus direction regarding the timing of the payment and as long as the payment amount is not amended the fee chart does not need to be revised. BACKGROUND Liquor licenses run from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. The On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License fee is $4,500 per year and the Sunday Sales license fee is $200 per year. It is requested that applicants for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales licenses be allowed to make payment at the time of application of half of the amount due with final payment of the remaining balance by or before December 31, 2025. The original invoice will be sent with the total amount due, and the split payment will be made available upon request. This option has been reviewed by the City Finance Department and is acceptable. This option is being requested to support our local businesses. RECOMMENDATIONS Consensus direction to approve a split payment for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales licenses with half payment due at the time of application and half payment due by or before December 31, 2025, upon request of the applicant. ATTACHMENTS None