Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-05-25 - Council Work Session AgendaCITY IN KE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, May 5, 2025 Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz Interim City Administrator: Dave Pecchia COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 6:00 P.M. Community Room (Not televised) I No Public Comment allowed per the Rules of Decorum Item # Topic Time (Estimated) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 6:00 PM 2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 6:00 PM 3. Option to hold Local Board of Appeal & Equalization or 6:00 — 6:20 PM Open Book Meeting, Alex Guggenberger, Anoka Co. Assessor 4. Natures Refuge North PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 6:20 - 6:50 PM 5. Wilkinson Waters PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat 6:50 - 7:20 PM 6. Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant 7:20 — 7:35 PM 7. Birchwood Acres Pond Treatment 7:35 — 7:50 PM 8. 1-35E Joint Powers Agreement 7:50 — 8:00 PM 9. Special Assessment Senior Deferral Code Update 8:00 — 8:10 PM 10. Liquor License Fees 8:10 - 8:20 PM 11. Administration Update 8:20 — 8:35 PM 12. Notices and Communications, City Council 8:35 — 8:45 PM ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Item 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CIVIC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Local Board of Appeal & Equalization / Open Book Meeting INTRODUCTION This evening the City Council is scheduled to hold the Local Board of Appeal & Equalization prior to the City Council Work Session. There is another alternative to this meeting, the Open Book meeting. The County Assessor has been invited to attend tonight's Work Session to review the two options for the consideration of the City Council. Several cities in Anoka County have moved to the Open Book format. BACKGROUND The Local Board of Appeal & Equalization is a forum for property owners to appeal their valuation or classification. It operates at the city level, and appeals must be made to the Local Board before proceeding to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The Open Book meeting is hosted by the County and the Assessing Department meets with property owners as part of this process. The advantage of the Open Book meeting is that property owners can attend the County Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting without having to attend the Open Book meeting, thereby extending the time for property owners to submit their next level of appeal. They are otherwise required to attend the date specific Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting to appeal the decision to the County Board of Appeal & Equalization. If there is interest in moving to an Open Book meeting format, Council action preferably by resolution, is required to designate an Open Book meeting format for future years. If after moving to an Open Book meeting the Council would like to return to holding a Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting, that can be re-established at the request of the City. The County Assessor has indicated that a valuation report can be submitted and/or presented to the City Council, at the request of the Council, if we move to an Open Book meeting format. RECOMMENDATIONS Review options for holding a Local Board of Appeal & Equalization meeting or an Open Book meeting. ATTACHMENTS ►MAN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 4 STAFF ORGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director DATE OF WORK SESSION: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Natures Refuge North BACKGROUND At the Work Session, staff will present the May 12, 2025, Council staff report, attached in draft form. The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, has submitted an application for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD), PUD Preliminary Plan (PPP), Preliminary Plat (PP) approvals. The project proposes to create 93 lots on 60 acres located north of Natures Refuge and is called Natures Refuge North. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025, and recommended approval with several conditions. Primary discussion at the work session will be recommendations regarding: 1. Building Design flexibility 2. Connection to Andall Street. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION None. Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS 1. May 12, 2025 draft Council Staff Report 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: May 12, 2025 TOPIC: Natures Refuge North Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. XX-25, Rezoning Property from R-X, Rural Executive to PUD, Planned Unit Development ii. Consider Resolution No. 25-XX, Approving PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat, Natures Refuge North VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting City Council consideration to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. XX-25 from R-X, Rural Executive to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Resolution No. XX-25, PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat approval. Review schedule: Complete Application Date: March 12, 2025 60-Day Review Deadline: May 11, 2025 60-Day Extension Deadline: July 10, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: March 26, 2025 Park Board Meeting: April 2, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: April 9, 2025 City Council Work Session: May 5, 2025 City Council Meeting: May 12, 2025 BACKGROUND 1 The applicant, M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC, originally submitted a land application for PUD Concept Plan ("concept plan") review in October of 2023. The proposed development, called Natures Refuge North, includes 2 parcels totaling approximately 60 gross acres located immediately north of the Natures Refuge development. In addition to advisory board and City Council review a neighborhood meeting was held on February 6, 2024. Concerns raised during the review process included development density, proximity of new housing to existing Arena Acres neighborhood, traffic and safety concerns with connection to Andall Street, impact on trees, wetlands and wildlife and garage sizes. Based on comments received from advisory boards, City Council review and the neighborhood meeting a revised concept was received in July of 2024. The revised concept plan application reduced the number of lots by 16 (converting them all to 60-foot-wide villa lots), increased the buffer to Arena Acres by at least 110 feet, reduced the proposed tree removal, and reduced the net density by 0.38 units per acre. The concept plan was reviewed by the City's Advisory Boards and City Council. The applicant has now submitted a PUD Preliminary Plan (PPP), Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to PUD for consideration. This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Narrative prepared by M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul dated March 5, 2025 • Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated April 25, 2025 • Land Use Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Sanitary Sewer Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Net Area Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Phasing Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Surface Water Area Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 • Ghost Plat unnamed and undated ANALYSIS Current Proposal The proposed development includes 93 villa home lots designed for empty nesters and seniors looking for single level living with association maintenance. Project Phasing The project is proposed to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 includes approximately XX lots with the extension of Haywood Drive and Street D. Phase 2 will include the balance of the development along Street A, northwest of the pipeline. Existing Conditions The property is wooded with aspens dominating the canopy intermixed with birch, oak, maple, and red pine. Approximately 10 acres remain in agricultural use. Wetlands are located on site, including wetlands located withing the Rice Creek Watershed District Wetland Management Corridor. A natural gas pipeline crosses the property diagonally from the northeast corner to the southwest. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use 2040 Future Direction Zoning Current Land Use Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve PUD, Planned Unit Single Family Low Density South Development Residential Residential R-1, Single Family Low Density East Undeveloped Residential Residential West R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve Comprehensive Plan Per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan the site is guided for low density residential. This land use provides for housing at densities ranging from 1.6 to 3.0 units per net acre that is served by municipal sewer and water services. The proposed net density is 2.99 units per acre, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's guided land use and density range. The following chart implements Met Council's formula for calculating net density. Apr 2025 Gross Area (acres) 59.30 Wetlands & Water Bodies (5.31) Public Parks & Open Space (19.14) Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (3.38) Other (Wetland Buffer Area) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 31.47 # of Units 94* Gross Density (units/acre) 1.59 Net Density (units/acre) 2.99 *Assumes conversion of Outlot E to a single family lot Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R-X, Rural Executive Current Land Use Agricultural/woodland Future Land Use per Low Density Residential 2040 Comp Plan Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) The property is currently zoned R-X, Rural Executive. The R-X zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to develop the site. The property will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development to implement a conservation development by allowing for zoning flexibility. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Conventional Zoning Requirements vs. PUD Guidelines Per City Code Section 1007.024(4) for PUD, Planned Unit Development, the development guidelines for land guided low density residential development are either R-1, R-1X, or R-2. The following chart compares the R-2, Two Family Residential zoning requirements to the proposed development. PUD Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Proposed Villa Lots Flexibility Requested? 7,651 square feet Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet (Average lot size is No 9,266 SF) I] Minimum Lot Width (interior lot) 60 feet 60 feet No Minimum Lot Width (corner lot) 80 feet 70 feet Yes Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125-165 feet No Minimum Front 25 feet 25 feet No Setback Minimum Side 10 feet (5 feet for Setback Attached Garage) 7.5feet Yes Minimum ROW 25 feet 20 feet Yes Setback (corner lots) Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet No Impervious Surface 65% 65% No Collector Road Right- of -Way Width 80 feet 60 feet Yes Minimum 20 feet in Garage Size width and 520 square 21— 24 and 528 to No feet in size 600 SF Garage shall not protrude forward of the front wall of the The applicant is house, unless the house includes a front requesting allowance to porch that is unenclosed, a protrude up to 5' in Garage Design minimum of six (6) feet front of the house. Yes in depth, and extends Of the 34 house across 100 percent of elevations proposed the front facade of the by the applicant — 6 house. The garage shall elevations protrude then not protrude in front of house. forward of the front porch. The length of the garage wall facing the street shall not be Garage walls shall not be greater than Garage Design greater than 50 percent 58 percent of the Yes of the length of the length of the entire entire front facade of front facade. the structure for street - facing garage doors PUD Flexibility Provided: Collector road right of way. The right-of-way width of Haywood drive (Street C) will be reduced from 80' to 60' along Haywood Drive (Street Q. This is consistent with previous flexibility to applied to the Natures Refuge to the south. The reduction in width minimizes the development footprint and increases the area of preservation. Sidewalk will still be included within the 60' right-of-way to accommodate pedestrians. Cul de sac length. The cul de sac length of Street D is proposed at 620'. 500' is the maximum length allowed. The street will be 32 feet wide instead of typical 30' and include hydrants and midpoint and end of cul de sac. Corner Lot width and Corner Setback. The applicant has requested a reduction in Corner Lot width from the required 80' to 70' and Corner Lot setback from 25' to 20'. Corner lot widths are generally wider to accommodate building setbacks from both streets and provide uniformity between lots fronting different streets. The city has generally allowed for reduced width and setback where corner lots back up to another corner lot or open space. Staff is supportive of this request. Side Setbacks. Side yard setbacks will be 7.5' instead of the typical 10' and 5. This maintains a uniform side yard setback between homes. Garage Requirements. The applicant originally requested flexibility from the garage area (520 SF), width (20'), and garage architectural design standards. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended that no flexibility be granted. The applicant has revised plans to meet or exceed both the garage area and garage width requirements. However, they continue to request flexibility to allow the garage to protrude 5' in front of the house without the front porch requirement. They also request flexibility on the maximum length of the garage wall facing the street from 50% of the front fagade width to a maximum of 57%. The garage architectural requirements are intended to minimize the visual impact of garage dominated streetscapes and avoid monotony on narrow lots of the R-2 zoning district. Of the 34 home different elevations proposed by M/I, only six include the protruding garage. Given the number of architectural choices the concern over a repetitive layouts being used throughout the development is minimized. However, there is no specific requirement that would prevent this. With the expansion of the maximum garage width percentage all of the houses to accommodate the garage size adjustments. The villas are intended to provide single level living so a majority of units do not provide the 2nd level living space required to exceed the 50% maximum garage length. With the increase to 57% all products would comply and the developer would agree to meet all the same requirements including: 11 • Decorative garage doors with a strip of windows • Garage width in excess of two stalls will be recessed two feet from the main garage facade. • Total garage width will not exceed 32 feet. Subdivision Ordinance Conservation Development Per City Code Section 1007.007: Subdivision Ordinance Definitions CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT. The development pattern and technique whereby lots are arranged in closely related groups to preserve the natural amenities of the land through the creation of common open space. Natures Refuge North is a proposed conservation development. The villa lots preserve woodland and wetland areas, create more protected accessible public open space and establish the greenway corridor. The trail system is also incorporated into the greenway system vs. along the street creating a more enjoyable, safer, and valued recreational experience. The purpose of using the PUD zoning is to create a conservation development that establishes the defined public values of preserving and enhancing the on -site natural resources. The PUD also creates and enhances the greenway corridor and trails that are accessible to the public. Blocks and Lots The proposed development contains 93 single family lots and 5 outlots. The outlots contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Outlot E, located on the northern end of the plat, meets the size requirement of an R-2 lot but cannot be constructed upon without a grading easement from the property to the north. This outlot shall be platted as a lot bringing the total single family lot count to 94. Staff Comments: 1. City Code Section 1007.024 (5)(c) requires that if a PUD includes preservation of natural habitat those areas shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement with the City. The proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. 2. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. 7 Streets and Alleys Haywood Drive is identified as a minor collector road in the Transportation Plan and provides a north -south corridor from CSAH 14 (Main Street) to eventually Pine Street. All proposed street right-of-way widths are 60ft and the street is proposed to be 32ft wide from back of curb to back of curb. Street B is recommended to connect to Andall Street. Arena Acres was platted in 1981 and a 60 ft wide Outlot B was platted for future road connection to the east. This outlot is owned by the City. The extension will connect the neighborhoods and transportation system. This street connection is further supported by the following City Code Sections: § 1001.100 STREETS AND ALLEYS. (3) Streets, continuous. Except for cul-de-sacs, streets shall connect with streets already dedicated in adjoining or adjacent subdivisions or provide for future connections to adjoining unsubdivided tracts, or shall be a reasonable projection of streets in the nearest subdivided tracts. The arrangement of thoroughfares and collector streets shall be considered in their relation to the reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served. This standard transportation practice has been implemented throughout the City such as the Foxbourough connection to Fox Road, Saddle Club connection to Fox Road and the St. Clair Estates connection to Hokah Drive and Sioux Lane. The Andall Street connection is supported by Lino Lakes Public Safety -Police Division and Fire Division in order to provide faster and more direct emergency response to the entire area. The connection is also supported by Public Works to provide better efficiency for street maintenance and snow plowing. Sidewalks are proposed on the east side of Haywood Drive and Street A and the south side of Street C. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D. A trail is proposed to connect to the trail in Natures Reserve to the south through the stormwater ponds south of Street D to the eastern edge of the property across Street C and then north between the wetlands and across the gas easement to the northern property line. Before the trail reaches the northern property line, a trail connection is constructed west to Street A between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2. The maximum length of a cul-de-sac is 500 ft. Street D cul de sac is 620 ft. The street will be 32 ft wide (vs 30 ft wide) and a sidewalk shall be installed. Public safety is in approval with the cul de sac length. H., Staff Comments: 1. A temporary turnaround will be required at the north end of Street A. 2. Sidewalks shall be included on Street B and Street D. 3. The trail corridor between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 and east of Lots 1-4 Block 4 shall be widened to 30 feet wide. 4. Andall Street connection can be reduced to 24 feet wide. Easements and Outlots The applicant has provided 10 feet wide drainage and utility easements along the right-of-ways and along the rear property lines. 5 feet wide drainage and utility easements are provided along the side property lines to provide a total easement wide of 10 feet through both side yard easements, while where a stormwater utility pipe will be located between two lots, the applicant has provided 10 feet wide drainage and utility easements to accommodate the infrastructure. Drainage and utility easements will be dedicated over Outlots A, B, C and D. Outlots A, B, C and D will be owned and maintained by the development homeowner's association (HOA). As stated above, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. There is a 100-foot-wide gas line easement that runs from southwest to northeast through Outlots A and C. A city lift station will be located with a portion of Outlot D at the intersection of Street C and Street D. Since the lift station will be owned and maintained by the City, this area should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. 60.076d2oa-2 07 .4 'P New Outlot for City Lin Station sW Ig 12 :A126 .q,R'1 AA46.aR�llI .079 qR I 11 �� So \ -.2L Bo.O —J L— 82.5— Ito 10 l8.651 p R \ R STREET D 1 A conservation easement will be required for all protected open space areas (Outlots a, b, c and d). O] Staff Comments: 1. The portion Outlot D that is occupied by the lift station should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. 2. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over Outlots a, b, c and d. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The Preliminary Plat shows three stormwater ponds, one within Outlot C to the east of Block 2 and two located within Outlot D located to the south Block 4. The proposed trail runs between the two stormwater ponds within Outlot D and the southern of the two ponds will connect and expand the existing stormwater pond within Natures Reserve. Revisions submitted on April 28t" show the addition of a stormwater retention area northwest of Street A to address Rice Creek Watershed and City Engineer comments. Utilities Public water, sanitary and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. Water and sanitary will extend north along Haywood Drive. Water main is also proposed to be extended to Andall Street as part of the road construction. The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District 2 (Sub -district 2K). Flow is collected southward to MCES Meter M211 and Gravity Interceptor 8361 along North Road which passes southwest through Circle Pines. PID# 05-31-22-42-0003 is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and PID#05-31-22-13- 0001 is located in 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the one (1) parcel from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025). A sanitary sewer lift station is located along Haywood Street, east of Street D. This will provide service to the development as well as future service to the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. Proposed water use is within the capabilities of the City's existing water supply. The project will include a stormwater reuse irrigation system that will significantly reduce water use and impact on maximum day demands. Weekly summer water savings are estimated at 487,000 gallons. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan 10 Per the City's 2040 Parks, Greenways and Trails Plan, this development is within the Arena Acres and Wollan Park service areas. Arena Acres is a smaller 1-acre neighborhood park. Wollan's Park is an 18-acre open space wetland and not an active park. The Plan indicates a Future Neighborhood Park centrally located within the service area. Greenway corridors exist on site. Linear trails are proposed to provide connectivity to the existing Nature's Refuge trail to the south and a future trail connection when the property to the north is developed. The trail locations through open space and stormwater provide for a multifunctional greenway corridor. Staff Comments: 1. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30ft wide. Tree Preservation and Landscaping The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and vegetation stands while not interfering with landowners' reasonable use and development of property. The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical. A tree survey was performed that identified: April 2025- PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat Total Trees Surveyed 6009 Trees Removed (BUA) 2234 Trees Removed (non-BUA) 1262 Trees Preserved 2375 Mitigation Trees Required 292 The majority of trees on site are aspen with a mix of birch, oak, maple, and red pine. As discussed at the October 2024 meeting the applicant is proposing to dedicate approximately 34 acres of open space for tree preservation and future management. The applicant agrees to plant a minimum of 3 trees per lot throughout the development. One boulevard tree is required per lot. Staff will work with the developer on the two remaining trees to ensure that there isn't conflict with infrastructure and overplanting. 11 Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have been met with the dedication of open space for preservation. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. Topsoil salvaged from the area prior to construction will be spread over the new ponds and open space. The established seed bank should provide native species to thrive along with native seed mix. To allow sunlight and promote growth of the existing rare and unique species onsite, minimal tree planting is being requested throughout the open space. Sparce plantings of oaks will be planted within open space areas adjacent to the stormwater ponds. A revised landscape plan will be required detailing location and species. No planting within the existing pipeline easement and proposed storm sewer pipe locations are allowed. Rare, Unique, or Significant Resources An initial habitat assessment was conducted by MNR in September 2023 after which follow-up surveys for the 2024 field season were recommended. Accordingly, MNR completed surveys in May and July 2024 resulting in observations during the early and mid -growing seasons. In total six species of threatened or endangered species were found onsite and are listed in the table below: Species Classification Rubus fulled Threatened Rubus semisetosus Threatened Trichophorum clintonii Threatened Viola lanceolata Threatened Rubus stipulates Endangered Carex pallescens Endangered A take permit application has been submitted to DNR for proposed impacts to onsite protected plant species. Opportunities for transplant of some species to the adjacent Wollan's Park wetland bank with approval from the DNR. Stockpiling and using existing topsoil onsite will help preserve native plant communities and possibly extend the range of threatened species. Environmental Review Record 12 As previously noted, in 2006 a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the original Natures Refuge concept because the proposed 278 housing units exceeded the 250 housing unit threshold. The EAW thoroughly analyzed potential impacts to wetlands, rare plant and animal species, floodplain, water quality, noise, traffic and archeology. It was determined the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects and the Council passed Resolution No. 07-06 making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an EIS. The scope and size of the existing Natures Refuge and revised Natures Refuge North (152 housing units on 155 gross acres) is smaller than the original 2006 proposal (278 housing units on 232 gross acres). A revised EAW is not required because the 152 housing units do not exceed the 250 housing unit threshold. # Lots Acres Natures Refuge 60 95 Natures Refuge North 94 60 TOTAL 154 155 Wetlands Per the Wetland Delineation Report, sixteen (16) wetlands were delineated on site, totaling 7.17 acres. As shown within the Preliminary Plat: April 2025 Total Wetlands 7.17 acres Total Wetland Impacts 1.93 acres WMC Wetland Buffer (Ave. 4.54 acres 50ft) City Wetland Buffer (10ft 0.64 acres min.) For the 1.93 acres of wetland impact, the developer will need to obtain 2.43 acres of wetland replacement. Some of the delineated wetlands are in the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Wetland Management Corridor. Wetlands preserved on site will have to meet RCWD and City buffer requirements. Impacts will require mitigation and will be reviewed by RCWD. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. 13 Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by SSTS, dated October 15, 2024, and revised March 28, 2025. The study analyzed two design years: • Year 2027 to correspond to the year after completion of the Proposed Project with full construction of the original Nature's Refuge site (61 single family homes) assumed. The following access scenarios are considered: o Two Access Scenario - Access at the existing Main St/Glenwood Dr intersection and access at a proposed Andall St connection. o Single Access Scenario —Access only via the existing Main St/Glenwood Dr intersection. • Year 2040 to correspond with a planning year horizon. In year 2040 the Pine Oaks Addition development, adjacent to the east side of the Proposed Project, is assumed to be developed. Two additional access points are considered, a northern connection to Pine St through the future Pine Oaks Addition and a connection of Haywood Dr to Wood Duck Tr. Due to the feasibility concerns with the Andall St Access, access scenarios with and without the Andall St connection are considered. This study focuses on the roads and intersections that provide direct and indirect access to and from the site and details the existing and future roadway conditions at studied intersections and access points and includes traffic volumes, lane geometrics and traffic operational analysis results. The intersections reviewed included: • Main Street/Glenwood Drive • Main Street/Woodduck Trail • 4th Avenue/Andall Street • Andall St/Proposed Access The study results indicate there is little to no significant impact on the adjacent streets and intersections due to trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. Trip generation for the proposed development is estimated at 868 daily. Approximately 8% or 70 vehicles a day is expected to use the Andall Street connection. This is well within the capacity of Andall Street and Woodduck Trail based on the engineering review. Per City Code Section 1001.013(2)(c)4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the 14 subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. Based on the study Level of service requirements are met for both the 2027 and 2040 Build Scenarios with LOS maintained at C or better. Homeowners Association A homeowner's association will be established and provide both association maintained yards and snow removal. Staff is also recommending that the open space be owned by the association with the City retaining a Conservation Easement over the property. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments Lino Lakes Public Safety The Police Division supports connection to Andall Street. The connection is important for public safety response to and from the development. The Fire Division also supports the Andall Street connection to improve response times to the entire area. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the PUD and Preliminary Plat on March 26, 2025. Their comments are provided in the attached memo dated March 27, 2025. Park Board The Park Board reviewed the Preliminary Plat on April 2, 2025. The Board recommends cash fee in lieu of land dedication. The amount of cash dedication would be $329,000 ($3,500 per lot times 94 lots) minus the cost of trail construction. As discussed during concept plan review, the Park Board recommended designating the remaining cash dedication balances from Natures Refuge and Natures Refuge North to explore providing trails and leisure opportunities at Lino Lakes Elementary School. A collaborative arrangement with the Forest Lake School District to share resources could provide tremendous benefits for the students and general public. Planning and Zoning Board The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 14, 2025. The board debated various aspects of the development resulting in two failed motions. The board approved a 15 motion on a 5-1 vote to recommend approval with the conditions included in the staff recommendation, no flexibility from the garage requirements, and 24' foot connection of the road for emergency access only. City Engineer The City Engineer provided comments in the attached memo. Developer responses received following the Planning and Zoning board have been included. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The need for a formal master plan was not identified for this area in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the 2006 EA concept plan for low density single family residential conservation development. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The applicant is proposing a conservation development. The villas provide a housing option with main -level living with association -maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life -cycle housing. (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The conservation development preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics by minimizing wetland, woodland, and rare plant species impacts. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The revised plan shifts the villas to the east and creates a 160-390 buffer along the west lot line near the existing Arena Acres neighborhood. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. The configuration of the lots preserves as many wetlands as possible and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally which results in a smaller network of utilities and streets. (f) Mix of land use types. There is no mix of land use types. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The villas provide a housing option with main -level living with association -maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life -cycle housing. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City's Comprehensive Plan. • Planning District 2 identifies Woolan Park as a natural resource that should be protected. The proposed development strategically includes a stormwater pond/open space buffer near the Woolan Park wetland complex. This is a critical link to protecting this sensitive natural resource area. • A goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to provide service and capacity to developed areas of the city currently served by on -site systems. Municipal sanitary sewer and water also gets extended north which will eventually serve the Olive and Orange Street neighborhood which are smaller (<0.5 acre) lots on private septic systems and wells. • A goal of the Parks, Greenways & Trails Plan is to established greenway corridors. A multi functional greenway corridor incorporating stormwater management, trails and open space is established with the development. Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Conservation development that protects and enhances the on -site natural resources such as wetlands, woodlands, rare plant species, and open space that are accessible to the general public. 17 2. Main -level living villa homes with association -maintain yards and snow removal which addresses life -cycle housing. 3. Preserved wetlands and established wetland buffers/conservation easements 4. Orderly transition from existing large lot single family Arena Acres neighborhood to smaller single family detached lots. 5. Efficient use of land resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets 6. Protection of Woolan Park wetland complex. 7. Extension of sanitary sewer to eventually serve Olive and Orange Street neighborhood currently served by on -site systems. 8. Establish multi -functional greenway corridor and trail system that is accessible to the public. 9. Parkland payment in lieu of dedication fees will be collected in addition to the open space set aside under conservation easement or City ownership. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval with the following conditions (items with strike through have been addressed by the applicant with 4/25/25 submittal): 1. Flexibility be provided to allow the garage to protrude 5' in front of the house without the front porch requirement provided no such floor plans shall be allowed on adjacent lots. 2. Flexibility be provided to change the maximum length of the garage wall facing the street from 50% of the front facade width to a maximum of 57% subject to the following: (a) Decorative garage doors with a strip of windows are required. (b) Garage width in excess of two stalls will be recessed two feet from the main garage facade. (c) Total garage width will not exceed 32 feet. 3. That Street B connect to Andall Street with a minimum width of 24'. 4. Proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. Wetland buffers shall be provided around wetlands as required by RCWD. 5. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. ti A tE?mn.,r-,r" +61rA -, nH_I.A.90II be r e d -,+ +hP, n.,r+h oral .,f C+roo+ A 7. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D 9 rho +r-,il r„d.,r ho+R.,00n I A+ n R'A- -k I -,n.J '-At- II RIA-ek 2- -,n.J PA t Af 1 At,; 9.— The -pvFtiGR ^rrGf Q''A_t _D t h-t IS 9GG61poed by the loft StcatiA_n I.J ho r-,+r,d fr.,M Q1 4I.,+ n +hr.,61gh the ,-ro_A+i.,n .,f -, RP -I..., .,1 4+I.,+ +h-,+ .,., I.d ho .do l ,+ ,.J +., +ho Qty. 10. Cash fee in lieu of land dedication in the amount of $329,000 minus the cost of trail construction. I 11. Compliance with the City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 12. Compliance with the Environmental Memo dated March 27, 2025 13. A stormwater reuse irrigation system is required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. XX-25 (to follow) 2. Resolution No. 25-XX (to follow) 3. Narrative prepared by M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul dated April 22, 2025 4. Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated April 25, 2025 5. Land Use Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 6. Phasing Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 4, 2025 7. Ghost Plat unnamed and undated 8. Response Comment to City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 9. Response Comments to Environmental Memo dated March 26, 2025 10. April 25, 2025 Response Comments to April 14,2025 P&Z staff report recommendations. 19 Attachment 1 Ordinance No. XX-25 TO BE INSERTED 20 Attachment 2 Resolution No. 25-XX TO BE INSERTED 21 NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal INTRODUCTION M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC (M/I Homes) is submitting an application for a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for land north of Natures Refuge. The proposed plan includes 93 villa homes on an approximately 59.30-acre site. The original concept plan for this development was reviewed at by the City in late 2023, and a neighborhood meeting was held in February 2024. With feedback received from both city staff and officials as well as the neighborhood meeting, M/I Homes presented a revised concept plan, consistent with the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD plan. This revised concept plan was reviewed by the Environmental Board, Planning Commission and City Council in late 2024. That revised concept plan and this proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD Plan accomplish the following: Approximately 8.5 acres of open space adjacent to the Arena Acres neighborhood. o We revised the original concept plan to pull back lots from Arena Acres to the center of the development, increasing the buffer width from Arena Acres from 50 feet to 1 60-400 feet, and reduced the number of lots from 108 to 93 homes. • Approximately 34 acres of open space (58% of the site) and preserves natural features. o We provided 4 more acres of open space from the original concept plan. Providing this additional open space reduced the number of trees removed by 1,400. The site plan also takes care to avoid as many wetland impacts as possible. • A neighborhood plan and homes designed for empty nesters and seniors looking for single level living with association maintenance. We are requesting a PUD for this development to introduce a villa home option to the Natures Refuge neighborhood. Villa homes offer single level living and provide a low maintenance living option for older adults. Natures Refuge, to the south of this proposed neighborhood, has 80-foot-wide lots with traditional single-family homes. This neighborhood is proposed to introduce all 60-foot-wide villa lots with main -level living with association -maintained yards and snow removal. The City of Lino Lakes allows for development through a PUD if it results in public benefit as outlined in the City's PUD ordinance. Nature Refuge North provides the following public benefits: • Addressing growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. o The single level living provided by villa homes include association -maintained yards and snow removal and therefore are popular with our senior buyers who are looking for a low maintenance home. It is not financially feasible to offer association -maintained yards and snow removal in the current neighborhood given the size of the lots. o The configuration of the lots works to preserve as many wetlands and trees as possible, and avoids a gas line easement that spans the site diagonally. Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. As mentioned, the site design preserves over half the acreage in open space, which preserves as many wetlands and trees as possible. Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. o The development abuts rural lots, and smaller lots allow a significant buffer from the rural lots while continuing to meet density requirements. • Provision of a housing type that is desirable to the city. Page 1 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal o The villa target buyers are older adults who value low maintenance living. It is not viable for an association to maintain a larger lot. • Other public benefits and values as recognized in the city's Comprehensive Plan. o The proposed development will provide a lift station that is able to serve homes in the Stage 1 B Planned Service Area as outlined in the City's Comprehensive Plan. We believe the general requirements for a PUD are met in the following ways: • Public or common open space to meet minimum requirements established in the ordinance. The site provides approximately 34 acres of open space. • If PUD includes preservation of natural habitat, those habitats shall be permanently protected through a conservation easement or other legally binding agreement. We have preserved approximately 58% open space within the site in order to preserve natural habitat. We are proposing to deed these outlots to the City as permanent open space to be preserved in perpetuity as public park. If the City elects not to accept the land as parkland, the HOA will own the land. Deed restrictions or restrictive covenants will preserve the land as open space. Homeowners Association Required. The lots will be governed by a homeowner's association (HOA) as further explained below. Recreational open space or trail corridors intended as public parks or public trails shall be dedicated to the city or granted through an easement. o We intend to grant an easement over the public trails once built as was done in Natures Refuge. We will either dedicate the open space to the city or place deed restrictions over the lots. 409=»_\Z There are four proposed street connections. One connecting from the south from Natures Refuge via Haywood Drive and connecting to future development to the north, one to the west to Arena Acres, and one to the east for future development. If the City desires, M/I Homes would be open to options to provide connections to Andall Street. The proposed development has a total of 93 60-foot-wide villa lots. The following table compares the proposed standards to the Two Family Residential (R-2) zoning district. The site is currently zoned Rural Executive (R-X). Standard R-2 Zoning Standard Villa Lots Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet 7,500 square feet (Average lot size is 9,266 square feet) Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet 125 feet Minimum Front Setback 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Side Setback 10 feet (5 feet for Attached Garage) 7.5 feet** Minimum Corner Side Setback 25 feet 20 feet Rear Setback 25 feet 25 feet Impervious Surface 65% 65% Collector Road Right -of -Way Width 80 feet 60 feet* Garage Size Minimum 20 feet in width and 520 square feet in size We agree to adhere to these requirements. Page 2 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Garage Design Garage shall not protrude We are requesting this be waived forward of the front wall of but agree that the garage cannot the house, unless the house protrude more than five feet forward includes a front porch that is the house (further explanation in the unenclosed, a minimum of paragraph below). six (6) feet in depth, and extends across 100 percent of the front fa4ade of the house. The garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch. Garage Design The length of the garage Garage walls shall not be greater wall facing the street shall than 58 percent of the length of the not be greater than 50 entire front fagade (further percent of the length of the explanation in the paragraph below). entire front fagade of the structure for street -facing garage doors *This flexibility was granted for Natures Refuge. Haywood Drive from Natures Refuge was granted this flexibility, and the proposed development will extend Haywood Drive to the north. This flexibility is being requested for both Haywood Drive and Street A. **We will provide at least 15 feet between homes. The City currently allows a five-foot setback for garages and ten feet for homes, so this is generally consistent with R-2 zoning. GARAGE DESIGN STANDARDS In order to minimize impacts to trees, wetlands, and wildlife, we are proposing lot sizes consistent with the R-2 zoning standard with a lot width of 60 feet. R-2 zoning has different garage design requirements than the R- 1 zoning district and does not allow the length of the garage to be greater than 50 percent of the length of the entire front facade unless the second floor living space extends over the two -car portion of the garage; the garage doors are decorative and have a strip of windows; garages in excess of two stalls are broken up so the additional stalls are recessed two feet from the main garage stall; and garage width does not exceed 32 feet. We are proposing to be allowed garages that are up to 58 percent of the length of the entire facade. We agree to provide decorative garages with a strip of windows; not exceed two stalls or 32 feet in width; and to recess the garage doors two feet from the front of the garage. Some of our plans have living space above the garage, and we will provide a window above the garage where there is faux living space. This is further explained in the illustrations below. Because villas provide single -level living, we cannot provide the living space above the garage on all plans; we only have a few villa plans that are one and a half stories. We are also requesting that we be allowed some flexibility for some of our plans to have garages that protrude no more than five feet forward the house facade. The reason for these requests in flexibility is we cannot get to the 520 square foot garage size with meeting the design standards that are currently in place with single level living homes. In order to meet these requirements, we would need to make the house wider, and we cannot do that with the smaller lots we are proposing in order to conserve as much open space as possible. Page 3 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Plans with Living Space Above Garage Page 4 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal Windows in Faux Living Space Above Garage Page 5 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal DENSITY The total site area is 59.30 acres with 5.62 acres of wetlands and 5.18 acres of wetland buffers. The planned density for this area is 1.6-3 units per acre. Netting out wetlands and wetland buffers, we are proposing a density of 1.98 units per acre, well below the maximum -allowed density. PUD flexibility and the R-2 zoning lot standards are necessary to meet the minimum density allowed in the City's Comprehensive Plan and to minimize tree removal. It is not possible to meet the minimum density with 80-foot lots given the wetlands and their required buffers, as well as the gas line easement. With this site plan, 80-foot lots would yield 69 lots as shown in the Yield Plan Density Exhibit, which would result in a density of 1.41 units per acre, which is well below the minimum density planned for this area. Furthermore, these larger lots would result in greater tree removal. TREE PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE As mentioned above, we have designed our neighborhood plan to conserve as many trees as possible. Of the 6,494 trees on the site, we are saving 3,060 trees: almost 50%. We are proposing to preserve these trees in permanent open space to be dedicated to the City for public park, or as open space to be owned by the HOA. Given the extensive dedication of open space/park for permanent tree preservation, we are requesting that the City accept the land dedication and tree preservations areas or allow the space to be owned by the HOA and protected by a conservation easement and left natural in lieu of paying tree restitution. As part of this request, M/I Homes will agree to plant three trees per home for a total tree replacement of 279 trees. The Environmental Board, Planning Commission, and Council agreed during the revised concept plan review that this flexibility should be granted. We are proposing this for a number of reasons. First, the proposed plan preserves a little over 58% open space, conserving as many trees as possible. This is a heavily wooded site that is guided for a density of 1.6- 3 units per acre, and we are proposing a very low density, almost near the lowest density allowed. Additionally, almost 50% of the trees on site are Quaking Aspen, which do not survive long due to Cankers, which will kill the trees in 3-8 years. Finally, we have received extensive feedback from the residents of Arena Acres regarding the preservation of trees on this land. The dedication of public land would allow them to enjoy this land and the trees that are being preserved. If the City chooses not to accept the land dedication, an alternative option would be to place a deed restriction on the open space area prohibiting the removal of trees, and the land would be left in its natural state. The HOA would own the open space property. ELEVATIONS Example elevations of our villa product have been provided. These are just an example of the many elevations we offer. We also have anti -monotony requirements to ensure that very similar elevations are not adjacent to one another within the community to preserve visual interest. TIMING We plan to begin grading the site in late spring/early summer after approval of preliminary plat and other applicable agency approvals. We understand a grading -only development agreement will be required in order to accomplish this and therefore request that this agreement be reviewed concurrently with this Preliminary Plat and PUD application. Installation of utilities will occur when final plat has been approved and all conditions of final plat approval have been met. A phasing plan has been provided and is in draft form. The phasing plan will ensure that the lift station is up and running with the first phase of the development. Page 6 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal A*2CA[469VA:KOKOIL llZI_\Z0W The development will have an HOA that will provide for the maintenance of the overall common elements in the community, including landscaping of the common areas as applicable and management of the natural resources. The HOA will also provide lawn care and snow removal for villa lots. Additionally, restrictions will be placed on outdoor storage and parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) in order to keep the community looking orderly and well maintained. Page 7 Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Plan Submittal The Willow The Cedarwood f I Idd IMIN am mmvw- am I I ;Ja NATURES REFUGE NORTH LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA I Y S 0 0 MAIN STREET (CSAH 14) 0 z ¢ w N v Z F 5 LILAC ST. N APOLLO DR. NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP ,, 5 SHEET INDEX ' 1. COVER 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX 4-7. PRELIMINARY PLAT 8. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 9. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN INDEX C 10-13. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 14-15. DETAILS - R1—R2. RESOURCE INVENTORY T1—T5. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3 L1—L4. LANDSCAPE PLAN F1. FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT W1. WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT z 0 50 100 200 --- (IN FEET) BENCHMARK _j 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 — Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 — Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) ENGINEERING CARLSON PFIE,45ANTII3NE SITE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH 1 SURVEYING , MIN iBLAMNE TELL.~. direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: � //� , ^� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 COVER of ENGINEERING �`NNIN€' Fax 7W. Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 / CA►RLSON-ENSNEEFINGDO14 the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 1 1 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_cover.dwg # 5412-03 1 1\ I r Up O J WI 0Cq Z( WO °-c U ZQ �� 1/2 inchopen iron pipe -- ug- u9 - Fence post (no fence) lies t0.7 ft.- North of property line Fence post (no fence) lies t1.1 ft. South of property line 0 C O O U 3 N (n N Ld 111.0 rn00 PO k 0) M ° co 00 T­ ° o N C__ I WN O Wo C� I N zQN °zM �o UW S01 °54'53"W 1/2 inch open iron pe 1252.48 (S-f0'4 ^ barbed wire fencd I N ° � N c 0 oo� n`i m o °�� W �o t �.a) o I 0 0 Z m Z�: WAN �o o W a o � I I G° n n Lu oo F, 61) C \ •/-1 LJ LJ I 1 I l / I V Val? 0 I A'1 0�Q'•\,0Q�Dt'p,° ��F' OQ���0°1 s1�����'O�Q'���` 01° ��0\���•\,0e D�.° 0GOi p \`' I G�O nVl /-1 I -On ° �p\ 00p Qp Northeast comer of the �� 5� F.��j�' G�5' �i -. \ 0 0�`1'�' 0� F' `L' East line of the North 1 2 of OWNER: z Southwest 1/4 of the pGj G�y P p PGOca I �5 y,�i �0 ��, / PREFERRED PROPERTIES AND MANAGEMENT INC 0 __ the Northwest 1/4 of the P 0 \� Q\0� � p G� � I �� '�'� PID:05-31-22-41-0004 - Northeast 1/4 of Q\��Q\0' Q\r\F'Q\0' Q Q\� Q\ P' 0� �' /'� Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, I P Section 5, Township 31, Q\��Q\0 Q\r\�'Q\0' Township 31, Range 22 Southeast corner of the North Range 22 S01053'15"W I 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of- 1310.67 ° �� the Southeast 1/4 of Section I S01 53 42 W 5, Township 31, Range 22 \ \ Fence p st (no fence) lies '�` � 659.98 �- f0.2 ft. youth and t0.4 ft. — \West of property line I I1 3/4 inch AI/ � open iron pipe ' I 7 n /n % T► / �, / 1/2 inch iron pipe \ \ \ \ \ WETLAND / ��_ East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast n (broken cap) ILI/ I VL/�\ I r� 1/ `'9 \ \ \ % 1 4 of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 \ \ 1 WETLAND I z WETLAND ll W� CL Uj I � o 9 ��— Fence postfence) p (no l lies f 1.0 ft. South of property line r— T ► ►r— o \ I _ a + z 1 r ll_ 0 / q i I existing gas line as field —�� \ \ �o o,. \ o CN U �— Fence post (no fence) lies marked and located \ s \\ ��2 0 \ 7^ _ — — I \ f0.1 ft. South of property line \ 00 V ° ° N CN I n 0 ^ Ori 0 co °'"' iZ°ink Qo ° ILIJ a� o 771 \\ P�a�9PP\ WETLAND �,o�z�� l `y ¢N I\ —Fence post (no fence) lies I \ 09 \°� Qo P, \ / Y � f0.5 ft. South of property line \ \ 1 \ ` � O a I 'IL I \ \ `9\ c odPo \l\ � \ z F°- o ° c J� o o OI J 8s \ \1 0� mN°�� `Zaa W� ILI \ / o uiQ l° c W N WETLAND \ s �� \ �. ZE >ILL IL C) I �IL WETLAND - - - - - - - - - - o _WETLAND (// _- ILL �� Q W� 0 Q \ T► ►I A /r-� T ��/ ov Imo -WETLAND U►r Tr1L \ \ 9 \\ \ \ \ �i ao I \ \ V I WETLAND Imo -WETLAND I \ g\ V A\ WETLAND I \ \ \ \ \ I m \ WETLAND \ \ \ \\ \ - _ _ I IJ AImo\ / L, i existing gas line as field — J marked and located I ILL\\ \ \ Qo N � cno J - WETLAND \ \ \ Y /ICq 1 Vl/�\ 1 _/1"l`: 'u� ILr1L\ I o9\ \ I of 1 West line of the North 1 2 / 'IL WETLAND zwN mi' of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, I \ \ \ // W Northwest corner of the Southwest Township 31, Range 22 � ''� � CL -1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of WETLAND AND- WETL I 7 Fence ' Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 I post ( o fence) lies / I - -WETLAND Fence post (no fence) lies / t0.1 ft. Eastl of property line_, r\\/\ \ \ \\ \ 0 ' t0.8 ft. East of property line —\ i Fence post (no fence) lies \ / 1 \ cos \ / � 1 i t0.2 ft. East of property line- \ ' \ \ fence) lies OWNER: \ / L_ /--1 N01 °54f 3 ft'53"E �-. East F47ce post (no of property line \ \ I r7 \ 1315.28 ` x _ 09 z S01 '54'53"W WADE M & HEIDI M HALLSTROM \ OWNER: I c� o I x � 1983.42 \ PID: 05-31-22-24-0009 SCOTT W & CAROL A FEATHERSTONE Y Oj I / `woven wire fence (Unreadable inch iron pipe N01 °54'53"E X RLS 41578 \ West line Of the Southwest 1/4 of_�� (unreadoble cap) barbed wire fence end 9 661.14 \ PID:05-31-22-24-0010 JN the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, barbed wire fence (lying -mil I \ I 0 1 I Township 31, Range 22 OWNER: I -Fence post (no fence) on or west of propoerty \ z Z N / RAYMOND H & JUDITH K STADUM line more or less) Southwest corner North 1/2 j \ o L N c \ A L% r n/ n p li OWNER: \ 1\ L_ \ 1 V /-� I 0 1 I ROD W KUKONEN / > o PID: 05-31-22-24-0016 -a OWNER:CD / \ JOHN ED KIN JOHNSON / AN D A L L STREET PID: 05-31-22-24-0008 PID: 05-31-22-24- 0015 / I of the Northwest 1/4 of the --I o a, Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, \ E ° o \ Township 31, Range 22 ° o ° ° V) lr OWNER: " DEBORAH J SCHULTZ OWNER: on � o PID: 05-31-22-31-0001 JOHN L BURCH \ a0 \ PID: 05-31-22-31-0007 \ ° I° \ `o z PARCEL DESCR/P7701V. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment File No. 59590, with a commitment date of August 22, 2023 at 7:00 A.M., prepared by CBH Title, LLC as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company) The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, and the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. (abstract property) GENERAL NOTES.' 1) The field work was completed on September 12, 2023. 2) Bearings shown hereon are based on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, which is assumed to bear S01 °53'15"W. 3) Above ground utilities have been field located as shown. All underground locations shown hereon are APPROXIMATE. Prior to any excavations or digging, contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (651-454-0002). LEGEND - Denotes Anoka Section Monument, as noted • - Denotes Found Iron Monument - Denotes Light Pole - Denotes Miscellaneous Sign CP Q - Denotes Guard Post O - Denotes Sanitary Manhole SMH HYD \� - Denotes Fire Hydrant cv X - Denotes Gate Valve — U9 U9 — - Denotes Underground Gas ufo - Denotes Underground Fiber Optic - Denotes Watermain ->>- - Denotes Sanitary Sewer x x - Denotes Existing Fence as noted - Denotes Bituminous Surface jI - Denotes wetlands delineated by Kjolhoug Environmental services in 2023. - Denotes Existing 2 Ft. Contour - Denotes Existing 10 Ft. Contour z 0 50 100 200 ( SCALE IN FEET ) CARLSONSURVEYINGENGINEERING PHEASANT RIDGE DR NE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this survey, plan Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. or report was prepared by me or under my DRAWN BY: bjs Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments M / I HOMES O F M I N N EAPO LI S, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTHT��.55449 2 OXNN direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: ��/ ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 EXISTING CONDITIONS of ENGINEERING :PLANNING FAX ��� �N-ENONEEMIN113 M Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 e St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Lino Lakes, Minnesota / / 15 Save Date: 04/25/25If:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_xcon.dwg 1 n I r Up 0 J W1 0 �W^ OVA Q I 0 W zo a� 1/2 inch open iron pipe 0 in_o O U (n N Lv L0 0)06 �O �� 0)V) ° oo T­ ° o N C__ O` I WN O Wo C� I N Q ZQN �Z UW o I O I G o^ �� 0 Lu 0 GO OC3N rll? /�y'�' lCN�O9 ct p5 k 0 c0.: 0 0 Q Q / I Northeast corner of the l�L�,'S� Z Southwest 1/4 of the PGph -� Northeast 114 of Section 5, Township 31, '\ Range 22 n l I �—� r� n /—I LJ LJ I 1 I I U I v GO GO I OO 40 ON1 F.��'�`� I G° 0 OR 0 0 ON 5 /� GAF' /'j F.5 ^a1 0 OF, �,' ��i1 � Oy Q' PGpO/ I G�`L Q Q\� Q�0 P OO S01 053'15"W 1310.67 ILL IiL LLL l �� I \\ East line of the Southwest 1/4 of _ \ I ILL � 7/ �- the Northeast 1/4 of Section 51 \ \ WETLAND LL/ Township 31, Range 22 ILL 13 `,WETLAND �� \\ ^/11 ►TI ►IA/r-�T /,I 12 \ 1� 'Jul Al, WETLAND ► ®1 19 c 8 0 UTLO T C \ ' \ /-� r- T ► ►r- i �► \ \ \ \ WETLAND 11 6 \ \� ; WETLAND Al 7 \ AL a \ \ \ IA/N I�I II�� i 4 ... 1 2 3 4 \ \\®®IR\ ®i® ®® ®® 13 I East line of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 114 of the i' Southeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 1 I r- F- L - I PREFERRED PROPERTIES AND MANAGEMENT INC PID: 05-31-22-41-0004 Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of--, the Southeast 1/4 of Section S01 053'42"W 5, Township 31, Range 22 659.98 3/4 inch open iron pipe I 2 4 / 5 STREET D 1� I WW 1� 16 20 15 21 4 ___ X 114 22 23 / Y � 24 : .: 1 26 13 112 1/2 inch iron pipe (broken cap) N O Q 0_ U 3O� QO 4 �, W N a z � o= r� WI U � r II O 18 0 UTLOT D I Q \i Z /1 r- T► ►r- I _ Li 10 I LI_ � o o OZ I I I L I o Q) o �� W� �z o,a Z 2 O I zWN ILI \ I 2 M / WETLANDS/ -' W "� ,_- �CL �: 0 Q .. ®®®®®®®■f®®®®®®®..®®®® Q n 1/1 jTl II A/r-^T .1 /^ �� O Q Z \ ® c 2 1 Vl/ I r1 vvL_.: I I/ `t M0) 1 2 3 6 \\ ® 2 �QN� 0 28 �z 20 \ o a o o cn N 36 j / \ 30 4 35 \=�= 34 STREET A _� 31 33 / r 5 4 �. ° o az��"' �Y� 32 f o 10 11 ® ` 12 11 o N o 3 10 9 ® 7\ O�Q�I° 10 C ----- ® \ �° G,) 8 2 �— ® 17 3 6 5 4 LI J\ ILL 2 \ /� `\ / Z �•� \� ® / `\ •\%� \\ 0UTLOT A nr- -7-1 ►r-No �o WETLAND \ � (\ Pd `\ vi I r1L_ ' � w � i- — 1 \\ I � 'moo \ � . ��- . O� �O1 �Y1 / \ cos` n��7L_ LL ' WETLAND oN <� �6N /IiL® \ \ Imi 1/2 inch open (IiL iron pipe WETLAND S01 °54'S3"W 1 \ \Lb 1252.48 (s-f°.4 -- w-f o.2) , WETLAND 0 ® 7 SV A \LLJ - ' \ i `� \ ^/l► SIT► Ir- A ^T N01 054'53"E AL AL 1315.28 `� \ / VRL sot °54'53"w \ OWNER: 1983.42 o N i WADE M& HEIDI M HALLSTROM \ OWNER: I cn o I - _ PID:05-31-22-24-0009 I _ o a \ \ COTT W & CAROL A FEATHERSTONE Y Oj 1 1/2 inch iron pipe N 01 °54'53"E _- West line of the Southwest 1/4 of —_'(Unreadable Cap) 661.14 1578 o o �\ Northwest corner of the Southwest PID:05-31-22-24-0010 JN the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, West line of the North 1/2 of of the Northeast 1/4 of I o I Township 31, Range 22 OWNER: i \ i / RAYMOND H & JUDITH K STADUM the Northwest 1/4 of the i Southwest corner of the North I \ o `d N W o of 5, Township 31, Range 22 J N PID: 05-31-22-24-0015 Southeast 114 of Section 5, --� 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of--/ o o the Southeast 1 4 of Section E \ o ci Oj n L% r n/ n p W^ OWNER: o c N \ /-1 1 \ L_ \ 1 V /-1 I �,r) I PID: 05D3 22Iff K�4EN / r_ \ p 9 / g on cLi ° c o Township 31, Range 22 c t \ 5, Township31, Range 22 ° o ° j N \ U p OWNER:o o p a / DEBORAH J SCHULTZ OWNER: \ o z / \ PID: 05-31-22-31-0001 \ JOHN L BURCH \ a� � OWNER: \ / l � / I \ PID: 05-31-22-31-0007 0� a JOHN EDWIN JOHNSON \ / o A N D A L L STREET \ / \ ) I2 PID: 05-31-22-24-0008 o 91818 1119'T NO: W C� I I 4 6 PARCEL DESCR/PT10M. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment File No. 59590, with a commitment date of August 22, 2023 at 7:00 A.M., prepared by CBH Title, LLC as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company) The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, and the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±59.30 AC. TOTAL ROW AREA f5.59 AC. TOTAL OUTLOT AREA ±33.94 AC. OUTLOT A ±7.91 AC. OUTLOT B ±4.50 AC. OUTLOT C ±14.33 AC. OUTLOT D ±6.75 AC. OUTLOT E ±0.20 AC. OUTLOT F ±0.25 AC. TOTAL LOT AREA ±19.77 AC. SMALLEST LOT ±7,800 S.F. LARGEST LOT ±12,996 S.F. AVERAGE LOT ±9,253 S.F. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 93 GROSS DENSITY 1.57 LOTS/AC. EXISTING ZONING R-X PROPOSED ZONING PUD UTILITIES AVAILABLE SETBACK DATA MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: FRONT 25 FT. SIDE 7.5 FT. SIDE CORNER 20 FT. REAR SETBACK 30 FT. PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: being 5 feet in width, and adjoining side lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on this plat. LEGEND - Denotes Anoka Section Monument, as noted 0 - Denotes Found Iron Monument - Denotes wetlands delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental services in 2023. z 0 50 100 200 ( SCALE IN FEET ) CARLSONSURVEYINGENCSINEE�tING PHEASANT RMSE DR NE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this survey, plan Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. or report was prepared by me or under my DRAWN BY: N]S Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments M / I HOMES OF M I N N EAPO LI S, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTHT�I� 3 MN 55449 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: A��/ ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX of :PL'�� ENGINEERING ANNINE< FAX �� �N-ENONEEi�NOMM Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 c St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Lino Lakes, Minnesota / / 15 Save Date: 04/25/25If:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03—preplatindex.dwg I 1 - - - - co I 21 t9,912 sq.ft. / I ! I 1 ' °o � ao � f10,550 sq.ft. /� / I �50'6 � � � - � � / I / / L , l� 0 UTLOT D 6 _ - - - L I J WETLAND / I V '� I Drainage and - - � 1 I f9,288 sq.ft. I, � I /'Utility Easement l / L � � I \ �o \ � \2g 9 /� f294,211 sq.ft. \ ' ' I I e and I- - -I - 155.9 1 \ M \ / Drainage and Utility Easement o TDrainag \ \ ' I - Utility Easement_ o - - - - ` ��/ \ L I � o � \ � \ ^ (Over all of Outlot D) i \ // co - -1 133.0 O - - - - \.0 3 275.2 �, o t10,879 sq.ft. / / e 41 3 / \ o o °� / - _ 11 / C _ \ �w I 22 �\ \ / / \ \ o Nr 0 c,+ I / f 10, 886 sq.ft. / \ o �N 1 ±10,459 sq.ft. , , i \Q� �j\ �`0 / \ \ 4 ( r o Of 5 \ o N\ 1j 9 �' \� .61 \\ ///// I I \\ \�`'Q �/ , z a I LI_ I t9,647 sq.ft. \ /, / \ I/ , 13 I 1 \ \`� / o \ ' �" I \ / / \Rid \ / / ±11,696 sq.ft. I I 12 \ \ / 3 I I 23 / / / �cP \1� o I I f11,934 sq.ft. \ \ / o �� U _� \ i i f9,993 sq.ft. Q �6,"� co �/ \ t�S \ // O� / 0 J �c/7O o \o / aao/ ro9s RS O/ \ \ I �5e�' > 0� e en z v>^ 09 C 4 \ \ \ f10,678 sq.ft. . \ \/ �8.4 -7 --- o� 820 s 600 o ',f. r 8.1 3 / / A S SV / / t9,806 sq.ft. / // / // / / S3) / / \S \ / / 26 / / �O i \ \ �\ f10,675 sq.ft. / / \� ;' O 6 M / / / / \ \ \ < / ^> > \ / f8,002 sq.ft. ►y / / `t o \ O%/ / \ 72 \S 26� �70/ l of l 2! l l / �� 6 O N \ \ a�o \ �% / \� / /� ^�/ / f8,253 sq.ft. / / �Op A//'1'7r► IIA/1-�-r 1 /� rn \ ,� \ ss \ / / l / 22 I VV� 1 hVvCZ) 1 I/ �t 146.3 r- c0 - // /�\ \\ ,�' `. a/7o S9� / // // �\ S �� \ / // / // /l / 28 / // ?`3 g3.5 - z \0 \ �' \ O \ / / 2 .7 8j / f8,683 sq.ft. �, sq.ft. / / S \ / f9,045 sq.ft. / ;' O st 4 / / / / S __ 8 i �- \ `� / \ / / / �\ / / 6 62- /`� °s / 0/ �t8,145 sq.ft. t°. / 1S S0\ 51.2 •5o5 3,'fie p\7 ry 6 m I I I I I I I I A2//so/ CIP�10/ N f7,860 sq.ft. \0t9,812 sq.ft. 36 I -10 30 _11010 \ w '6 �- PS I t9,932 sq.ft. \�NoWNERO012 NoME'I35f9,035 sq.ft. w h / / A o Y f8,110 sq.ft. �I I I I I I I I oI vn F,P Ip 0`5� "\RE348 531 t8,472 sq.ft.A, f7,860 sq.ft. / / // 02.6 300 6V /.5 >> t9,469 sq.ft. Co 33 °� 6332 I 1 I� f8,952 sq.ft. of9 433 sq.ft. - p 60.3 9 13 59'5 6-< V L-0f8 930 sq.ft. t12,996 sq.ft. A0 8 r7 ,rin °�' 10 12 o \ 8,ot9,752 sq.ft. ,.. ;O 6 10 10 o ±11,219 sq.ft. f8,800 sq.ft. L------ -. o �c" 83.3 A10 .9 WOOD / /\ / 79.4 79. 4 Drainage f8,547 sq.ft . // DRIVE \ and Utility 33000 L0 N N i>asemen �9 �27.9 _ l rn/ IIlk L \ 9 / 1 \� 70.6 65 C // / f8,078 sq.ft^ / / �S�.g \ 3� r0 v�yV A 2 / / �^ / / / / 54.9 55.5 1 1 I I t9,500 sq.ft. 4' „o \_,, R_ '/ �o �qi��o \ o \\ " �/ / / / /�--_ 54.9 _1 1 1 I I �I ��N I \ / 3 250.0 -/ \ `. S \ / / 8 / i-- --� r \ 1 2 M / 0 _ 347.5 5.0 \ 9 J / f8,187 sq.ft. / / / \ 1 I I ro / 3 �_ \ \ 7 \ \ 1 / I I I \ 290.2 �� o \ \ \ \ 40 \ \ \ \ / \ \/ // // i I II I \I 11 3 11 1 8,s88 sq.ft. I III z o \ / \ \ / t8,059 sq.ft. \ • I = _ 70 \ \ / / % / I I I \ \ cr o E o �� \ \ 1 \\ 6 �\ / / / I 4 \ 1 I I \ / \ / _ 55.0 55.0 \ \ \ \ i \ I 0/ / / f8,809 sq.ft. / / 6 I 1 I I f8,556 sq.ft. - - - \ \ t9,367 sq.ft. \ \ / / ^/ / �1 1 5 I I, - / -I r - 55.0 - � r \ \\ \ \vp \ \ / \� 1 �\ 6)� / / / / t8,610 sq.ft. CN 1 t9,031 sq.ft. I I� 1 \ \ I \ / _ �// / / I I I 'i \ \ \ \\ // \ �� �' I\ •6��J / / / �1 I I I`° o „( / / I I I \ \ ,`� 6 I I I \ \ f8,703 sq.ft. \opo5 f11,263 sq.ft. // os ao 3 0��o\ 1 \ -592,4 .2 51 J 1- 5g.8 Lll L J3I 4 I \_ f8,70sq.ft. 6 f8,703 sq.ft. 76 8--L J1--- -oI I f8,703 sq.ft. �4'g / � � \ / / I I I I \ \\ � � � •\�\ \� S�� ' \ 167.2 50.2- 3 S OUTLOT A 4 " / \ 1 / \ ±344,400 sq.ft. Q i\ -- 80.4 80.4 -- WETLAND \\ Y\ \\ Drainage and Utility Easement �� C7L / / J \ -- � \ \ (Over all of Outlot A) 30 --- i Q tD I � ILL ILL ILL ILL�c AI\ I ` A\ � I LIJ rn w0N ZWN ILL ILL LLL 0 0 UTLOT A v V LID vv �� t344,400 sq.ft. I South line of the Southwest 1/4 of I \ WETLAND � - Drainage and Utility Easement �LL �LL �LLI the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, \ `� \\ / �LL �LL �LL �LL LL31 0 25 50 100 (Over all of Outlot A) / I Township 31, Range 22 \ _ \ ~ C Also the North line of the North 1/2 z of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast ,\\\ �� \ \ (SCALE IN FEET ) \ I 1 1/4, Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 � � \ j \ _ 7 30 \ � LLLL LLLL 1 /' V A\ �` A\ LLL LLLL LLLL 111L < \ ` \ITI ir- A ^-r q / A 1 0.0 �' 1 \ .)VV 1 r1e_r,`) 1 1/ `t South 1/4 corner of /1�✓ETLAN D � \ I 643.0 / \ h° \ \ l Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,_ 1354'53 � \ \ � � � � Township 31, Range 22 01 54 53"E West line of the Southwest 1/4 of � __ �\ the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,---/ 1/2 inch iron pipe I SOI054'53"W (cast iron Monument) 661.14 1983.42 Township 31, Range 22 I (Unreadable Cap) West line of the North 1/2 of the _" - - _ _ _ - Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4--' N01054'53"E RLS 41578 \ �� - - OWNER: OWNER: / / RAYMOND H & JUDITH K STADUM of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 JOHN L BURCH Southwest corner of the North 1/2 / OWNER: PID:05-31-22-24-0015 of the Northwest 1/4 of the / \ ROD W K2-24- PID: 05-31-22-31-0007 i PID:05-31-22-24-0016 / OWNER: Southeast 1/4 of Section 5,- DEBORAH J SCHULTZ Township 31, Range 22 \ / PID: 05-31-22-31-0001 PHEASANT RWCxE DR NE I hereby certify that this survey, plan Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: NJS Revisions: M / I HOMES OF M I N N EAPO LI S, L LC 4 CARLSONSUPIVEYINGENSINEERINts E 100 or report was prepared by me or under my 1. 4/25/25 Per City& Watershed Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTHBLA""., p y g 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 PRELIMINARY PLAT of MN 55449 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 ENGINEERING PLANNING ���4 Licensed Land Surveyor under Lino Lakes, Minnesota �N-ENSINEERIN�COM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 15 Save Date: 04/25/251 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwg i AI V V A _F z \.7 L_ 0 25 50 100 I I OWNER: I ( SCALE IN FEET ) PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO PID: 05-31-22-14-0011 IOWNER: M/I HOMES OF OWNER: LLC OWNER: I I PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO OWNER; PID: 05-31-22-41-0004 PID:05-31-22-14-0012 PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO OWNER: I PID:05-31-22-14-0013 PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO East line of the North 1/2 of the S01053'15"W PID:05-31-22-14-0014 /----Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 1310.67 / of Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of 38.8 S01 the Southeast 1/4 of Section 51`\ 297.3 °53'42"W Township 31, Range 22 38.8 � \� 98 I� East line of the Southwest 1/4 of �O �O 3/4 inch open 659.11/2 inch iron pipe �--the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, L n pipe (broken cap) 336.2 - -- -- Township 31, Range 22 125? 128.8 __ \ - 60.0 62.5 22.4 108.01 ?' x I----- 62.5 - \ ems d 0 -I - - - FF - {- 1 F_ g \ �' I I I 10 10 s.s1 vvI \ ► r7 1� \ 13 \ �� \ I I I � T_ i- l i I I .� f8,334 sq.ft. O 0�� I I I 39.4 - o\ c� 0 UTLOT F I I I C3*_ t10,806 sq.ft. I I 6 o 30UTLro \ \ LJ OT C 12 f8,126 sq.ft.I 1 f8,465 sq.f.I f623,126 sq.ft. fg�46sq.f1 II 1 II t94 sq.ft. /cn' Drainage and Utility Easement ,sq.. 5(Over all of Outlot C) / / / /�27\•S \ M I. / f9,917 sq.ft. cp 11 \ 30 \ 60.0 62.5 62.5 17.7 3- � \ t8,551 sq.ft. /u \ 6 '' / M STREET D o ±10,074 sq.ft. I`----� a Z� 269.9 M I mil/ /� r' O �i I �I 10 I �o o� 1 �\ 1 P - U,\ f8,735 sq.ft. I or ---- - 167_3------ 67.8 I� WETLAND _ _ o - _ 130.p 1 I / / \ /0 \ ±10,074 sq.ft. I I ILL ILL/---__ ---� �I 18 / / \ o 1-21 _ fl)v wl z C'v/ - ^ 1 t12,211 sq.ft. /Co / , 17 I hN/ 9 I^ 1 / \ / / I f11,315 sq.ft. I �----132.2- -� I I \ //C t7,830 sq.ft. _ 149.4 // / ao---------- \ � � � 135 co / - -/ - I ----------- - ^ r - �_ � ----- --------_---__------JN 30 30 8 �o w I / J �O/ ! /- - - - - - 1 t8,304 sq.ft. w 00 CO 8 t8,921 sq.ft. I __1457 15` 0 1C L f8,441 sq.ft. � 16 I -_ ---- - -- - - OL 151.3 30 J N f9,642 sq.ft. 30 1 13T1 V/ Co9 -7 1450 t8,975 sqft. o 1-7L 20 Alla-) ,I \/ / 0/ t9,542 sq.ft. 0�_?� 145.2I =6. II _ r� 1 co / �- ---- \IA/n\� \FIJI- L% I� /� I t8,265 sq.ft. /� 161.2 15 - - / I/ � � � � � - 129. I � - - -- - - - - - - -1 c\i 11 f11,366 sq.ft. lv� 6'pO r---- - 6_-_ -- / ----- UI 10 1 I - o I 21 /� / t9,912 sq.ft. 4 _ I / .01 I co ±10,550 sq.ft. 'N 150.6 \ 1 6 /� O UTLOT D / � I ro I 1 Drainage and / / \ I WETLAND / 1 f9,288 sq.ft. 1 I 'Utility Easement - - -/ L - - _ - -' \ �6, 126 9LO /�`� ±294,211 sq.ft. \ i 1 e and _ - 11 / - \ / \ / Drainage and Utility Easement O \ I / �Drainag - L 155.9 - i Utility Easement J I \� � I \ o - - - o J ^ (Over all of Outlot D) a) \ i 133.0 - - - \ .o \ / /\ 3 275.2 \ \ o o \ ±10,879 sq.ft. / / 9 4 q�.3 \ 11 / 0 0 o) 110 I CE 22 �\ \ \ N� \(Ai / t10 886 sq.ft. oco a 1 f10,459 sq.ft. / j \Q� �� °/ / / 1 i \ \ q' o \ L V) Lo 5 CA03 O r7 �I f9,647 sq.ft. 1 C� N\\ ,� �� /> \ /// 13 I I \ \9 // '� °' o / / / / \�� \ / r / f11,696 sq.ft. 1 I 12 \ \ 2 23 / / 00 \� 0'1 1 ±11,934 sq.ft. \ \ / o \1 4 a� Li 1� \ � \� � , � t9,993 sq.ft. / / / ���„\ � �I 1 \\ \\ / �0 c a`�i �o 70 \ \ \ \ \ / / n <v / / \ \ 1 1 ale Q5e / / V) z cn \ 9 \ / / 24 1 / \ \ t10,678 sq.ft. A 88. q• i � / / f9,820 sq.ft. � � i � 60. \•0 / 0 68.7 3 / t9,806 sq.ft. / / \ sr� \ / / o / 26 \ \ ±10,675 sq.ft. vi/ / / o <� // // \� ' s�� \\ /'o / �'/ / f8,o02 sq.fo/ // \� __ of p• / \ 7 / 7 l /� "0 \ \\ / / ��� 6) 0 f8,2 sq.ft. / / / / \\�Q h1/1 )TI IIA/[-;.-1 .1 /it M \ A / / 7 O / / \ 22 I V V �� 1 r 1 V V L_ 00 ��++ / �\ \ ,,� , a�Q �9; / // <11 28 // z 3,518 sq.ft. / / / / \ S \ \ '� \ 0 \ \ / 2 8 j / / / t8,683 sq.ft.- / / \ Q \ / / f9,045 sq.ft. / / \ „�O Rg` 4 __ / / / / 9 rol �/ 7°c�1o267 / / '_1 g 121 g1 9` 60 33.2 J 29 S\ �S�osSO t8 145 sq.ft. \ 4 "V 51.2 553 \ ��f7,860 sq.ft. / / > 2 sq.ft. 1��1 125�1 I 1 I II I I l I I 1 I II 367 e t9,811 / 4 00�I1 3 10 1�0 30 ' I W t9,932 sq.ft E h� f9,035 sq.ft. // 1 (1)3I -70 0 162S0 1W,f8,11osq.ft.348 6\1 LLJ n \ / / 1-7 Ocn __ CL i i \ \ / 3.4 \ / .71I f8.472 sa.ft I I I PHEASANT PJDGE DR NE I hereby certify that this survey, plan Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: NJS Revisions: M / I HOMES O F M I N N EAPO LI S, LLC �AIML�N ENGINEERINts E 100 or report was prepared by me or under my 1. 4/25/25 Per City& Watershed Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTH LI_ LI_ <I � SSOCIP 100 00 4mvER 0012 / S REFS 05 N j i / NP�URE PID/ BLA"",6& ., 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 PRELIMINARY PLAT SiJRVEYING direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: � z� ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 ENGINEERING PLANNING F-AX �. Licensed Land Surveyor under Lino Lakes, Minnesota CARLSON-ENIONEERINMCOM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 1 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwg 5 � of �15 21 41 1 � m ±10,55d0 sq.ft. c0 6 r� 1 Drainage an - ` I WETLAND - \ \ , I f9,288 sq.ft. I � 1 /'Utility Easement - - - � / % L \ I-\�---- o v' / Drainage and 155.9 \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ I / / co - -rt Utility Easement o - - - - - � 0 OUTLOT C \ \ \ I �,L \ 133.0 - o a - - _ - - - -N� \ t101814sq.ft. /,/� 3' I ±645,265 sq.ft. \ \ \ 22 Drainage and Utility Easement (Over all of Outlot C) \ \ \ \ / r I C"N 1 t10,459 sq.ft. ILL ILL ILL ILL ILLv` o v � 5 1w \ �06� ��� v / // WETLAND ` v f9,647 sq.ft. N \ / v / / 13 23 \17D / f11,696 sq.ft. ,IL / 81.0 81.3 `\ ` `\ I �� \ \ i t9,993 sq.ft. o�\�\ ' i g1• /� -- --- -� �\ 73 \ \ \moo o�9` /0 Ld 1 ` may/ �� \\ \� \ I f10,678 sq.ft. i�>� \ s`�Q / /24 8 \\ 1 \ \ \ / 8.4 o O \ � / - I / / � \ � 8Qg \ \ \ t9,820 sq.ft. % 60 C. o i 1 \� f8,907 sq.ft.n1 1 t8,976 sq.ft. �°I I 4 / /l \ \ \ \ \ \ o I i \\ ' V L 134.0 /' 6 < �� 1 1 1� \ �I I / \ ` I i i > %O ` / / 25 c i \ � \1 f8 896 sq.ft. t8,986 sq.ft. tq/ / � / > \ \ \ , , / '`� S>\ / .0 60.0 56.1 17.9 \ c� 1 1 I / \ ,- -1 3 /� S\ / / t9,806 sq.ft. 1 I / / \ f10 675 sq.ft. ,� ) \ / / �? / / t8 002 sq.ft. F -1 F----� - \ �� 1 I26 CP 0 o N \ / t8,893 sq.ft. �/ / \ \ A \ Otx / / ` \S 2 0 /' / o/ I I \ 4 1 1 _ J �11 / �• / s o/ l 2"r \ L--- --J / \'o/ / > \ °oo \ �/ / \� / / �/ / f8,253 0 f7,896 sq.ft. ` 55.0 55.0 \ \ \o\ � F9 5. s.o / o 20 o 50 6 \ to 0 f8,518 sq.ft. t9 045 sq.ft. 0 2 2 f9,069 sq ft. R=2500 CQs/ (0/ /° `v � Z t7,800 sq.ft. f8,255 sq.ft. _57o 6 s0 9 O \srstS 4 \J 2 s.�z�0 STREET Ah243345 7 O Sq. f\ O 0f7,860 sq.ft. t9,812 sq.ft. _ / / S> > _\ / / 0 I R� `�/ / \ -10 `� 23.6 60.0 57.5 U �\ o I I /��^; col • i Q6 / tL o 0 8 00 M ; 0 1 � R 15 'S� 5$\ \ \ I I /` \ / / t7,860 sq.ft. / / ` \ �� / / 35.8 c� 141.2 \ / / 2.6 0 \ 5 f8,491 //0lI II 5 0l � �/zo10 ��� a 0 t9,468 sq.ft.( I I SOt9,525 sq.fto 13 55'0 M 9 // I I / / `01 61.0 \ f8 930 sq.ft. 760.0 ±12,996 sq.ft. F 20.67 o 8,4�sq'ft\ 3 , O \w t8,794 sq.ft. 10 12 61. % fft9,752 sq.ft. f11,219 sq.ft. f9r209 sq.ft. 0t8,800 sq.ft. f8,096 sq.ft. / / / / i 7 aN I I I I I \`�`S / /���8 2 Drainage f8,5 o O 00 0 10 0 9 f9,544 sq.ft. f7,802 sq.ft. 19 � di � oa N cUtility w t8,700 sq.ft. t9,696 sq.ft. �and Co ; I \ '5o \ / // %(0 3 0 ,` `\� �. 70.6 s5.2 I I I I00 I � 9 / f11,211 sq.ft. / '., 3 ^5 _ R=250.0 - / , � �• \ h � \ I . S9 � / 290.2 p\ V A O i 61.0 60.0 76.3 ,�. \ \ 197.3 - \ i `30 R 00 \ \ 55.0 55.0 -\ \ \ \ / / - - - r \ \ \� f9,367 sq.ft. \ V / / oNf „0 I Il\ \\ \o\ 2 No ,03 sq.ft. o \ f11,263 sq.ft. °oaseaYC) �70, f8,703 sq.ft. \�p t8,70sq.ft. \ ` CA / 1 I f8,703 sq.ft. C co LU wo I 96s \� L I I I I '��� \\ e� � 7 Qe ---J L------� - \ / o - 0 UTLOT B ±195,878 sq.ft. ---- 30---- - 80.4 80.4 - WETLAND \ \ (y \ Drainage and Utility Easement 30 �! \`I \ (Over all of Outlot B) \ I \ I \ 'L 'L / ' /\ w 0 UTLOT A W L / \ \ o Northwest corner of the Southwest ±344,400 sq.ft. South line of the Southwest 1/4 of \ \ / 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of - Drainage and Utility Easement the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 \ � i � (Over all of Outlot A) /' Township 31, Range 22 I Also the North line of the North 1/2 -� � S01 054'53"W of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast '�I I'� 1252.48 1/4, Section 5, Township 31, Range 22 �\ - - n � � / 1/2 inch 612.3 30 1 30 �' � ILL open iron \ = pipe 30.0 30.0 1 i 643.0 ETLAND\ North 1/4 corner of Northeast W (S-t0.4 \ 1315.28 \_1/4 of Section 5, Township 31, v� o W-f0.2) Range 22 0 \ I I (cast iron Monument) OWNER: N01 054'53"E West line of the Southwest 1/4 of \ \ the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,--/ 1/2 inch iron pipe W N WADE M & HEIDI M HALLSTROM Co o Townshi 31, Range w c� PID: 05-31-22-24-0009 OWNER: I too p g 22 j `� \ SCOTT W& CAROL A FEATHERSTONE I l Y I I (Unreadable Cap) J N / OWNER: RAYMOND H & JUDITH K STADUM o \ \ PID: 05-31-22-24-0010 I � z I OWNER: PID: 05-31-22-24-0015 I z Q \ J N PID: 05D31 22-f 0 016 / 0 25 50 100 \ o SCALE IN FEET) ( CARLSONSURVEYINGENGINEERING PHEASANT PJDGE DR NE E 100 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: NJS Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City& Watershed Comments M / I HOMES O F M I N N EAPO LI S, L LC NATURES REFUGE NORTHBLA"NSF.., MN 55449 direct supervision and that I am a duly p y Signature: g ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 PRELIMINARY PLAT of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX �. Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws the State Minnesota Lino Lakes, Minnesota / 15 �N-ENONEEMN CEiM of of Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04/25/251 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwg O N U C I WI O AWN Q I Z6 I a: E I Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, `\ Township 31, Range 22 \ I I o I U �C) oW o PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO irk I 1\ I r- / 1 n I I PID: 05-31-22-14-0008 I 1 V L_ L/ /-1 C\ A n n I T I 1\ 1 w ;i!QN °LIJ L� I CC': OWNER: I _z PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO a OWNER: PID: 05-31-22-14-0011 I PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO OWNER: PID:05-31-22-14-0009 PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO PID: 05-31-22-14-0010 OWNER: I PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO PID: 05-31-22-14-0012 1/2 inch / \ S01 053'15"W I open iron ' \ 1310.67 pipe , � � 935.9 �]L 11L OWNER: PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO OWNER: PID:05-31-22-14-0013 PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT CO PID: 05-31-22-14-0014 \ 38.8 38.8 r � I \ ^ - jam T I I n N I �I I WETLAND East line of the Southwest 1/4 of .y0 .y0 V --the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, \ Township 31, Range 22 125 ' \ j 128.8 13 \ I f8,334 sq.ft. 0, I 0 UTLOT F o \I 1521\ \ \ �\ \ ±10,806 sq.ft. �O t9,079 sq.ft. \WETLAND I \ ��\ \ \ ^/l DTI 1"1 vvC.: 1 �� �t \ , - p JO V \� \ �i� ' \� � 11 30 \ 44.2 \ t8,551 sq.ft. \ LLJ ° Coll) �J) ` \ �� ���1 O wo \�� \\ \ `\ 0UTLOT C l I �� �' \ \ ±624,258 sq.ft. / P I 10 I o o°ol I I z 0 25 50 100 I ( SCALE IN FEET ) I I East line of t ----Northwest 1/, / of Section 5, I I I 297.3 \�T 3/4 inch open 336.2 iron pipe 6062.5 r-- .0 .0 ---- 62.5 - - -- 22.4 10 686 80 0 i \ \\ Vi10 I I I (D >,� I I 6� I 39 2 I 1 3 I f8,126 sq.ft�l I t8,465 sq.ft. `- 1±8,465 �,I sq.ft. I 1 f9,419 4 I I i sq.ft. f9,917 I------ L---- J10 10L- 60.0 62.5 -J 62.5 L 17.7 _ 34.8 STREET D I M � �93 - 269.9 I � C)f U, t8,735 sq.ft. 0 167.3 _ 67.8 �o Drainage and Utility Easement / I I I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ (Over all of Outlot C) / WETLAND / L _ 1 /- - \ \ \ raga \ \ - 18 l °� - -� I / v• sea \ / / - - - - - ^ I ±12,211 sq.ft. Co / 17 \ \ \ �00 \ �/ 9 I 4 / / f11,315 sq.ft. \I rn t7,830 sq.ft. L\ \ - - _ 4 - - ------- - 149. / I _- \ � �� 13 /`o --- ----/------- . e \ /1r- _ I it �7 ---- L-- � � � 5. I 146.5 I �O 30 19 \ \ 8 1` 3 / t8,921 sq.ft. \ / 1� • . 0 Co of \ � I t8,441 sq.ft. / i 3 - - _ 151. / 1 °j 0 - - 3 - - - - l l t9,642 sq.ft. 30 3 CIV I Nry/ ---- L --- 145. 0 r- \ _ -IF 111- _ C I 7 / \ / 20 t9,542 sq.ft. / / R=60.0_ / - n I A / I� I I I I �� `/ I �� 1 I 3 f8,265 sq.ft. /� L - - - 161.2 // -- _ -- _ 115 - 1,3sq.ft. ---_j , I ---7 �/ I '6c 21 I I00±10,550 sq.ft. cn 150.6 \ \ (0I Ira I Drainage and _ ---- -- -- ---_- \ � \ WETLAND _� \ ` \ I f9 288 sq.ft. I,� I i 'Utility Easement _ i L I \ 18, \ \ I e and L� � -I � - � I Drainage 155.9 tUtility Easement -- --_i- \ I � 4/ (OL/� 39 275 2 O 133.t10,8sq.ft. `t 22 413 wN� C� `o cn ±10,459 sq.ft.- \\ V \\ I o i \ \ WETLAND `\ � `� � � III f9,647 sq.ft. I i� \ / 13 I I / \c� \ / / ±11,696 sq.ft. I I 1 \V ` AV � I 1412�'��� \ i� i� 23 // / \d' �� of I f11,9: / .0 81.` i f9,993 sq.ft. / .Ili .Ili .Ili .Ili 813 � \/ / / --7 �\ 813 \ ` \\ I�\p \ C ���•/ // o�aa�°tc// 0/0 LLJ ,n / 1 / \ \ I 24 0) 00t10,678 sq.ft. i O / fg,820 sq.ft. I � I I \ i i \ \ • / / / ,60.0 `\�9�� 6°N Nr 2 0 3 �I I / / �� \\ \ \\ c°°ol 16�? �i/ \�O \ \ / /h^ \ / // �� 681 58.9 o i \ I t8 907 sq.ft.to f8,976 sq.ft. r,l / o I ` - y� - 134.0 / 6 <� \ 1 I 1� ' q I I 4 / / i vv �� vv I �� ��� \> o v // 25 / / / / �� 1 t8,896 sq.ft. 1 I f8,986 sq.ft. h />V 0 _ \ \ \\ q' I I I I Mo / l / / \ \ �� \ \ I 3 / /� �\ / / t9,806 sq.ft. 0 60.0 56.1 17.9 i a \ o \ I I l / / \ \ V / / \A� ; ' \ / / �/ l 26 / l l l �' \ ±10,675 sq.ft. / d' O 6' / -� r----� \ 1 I / \ N I I I I I \ \ \\ \ 1 I I I / / 5 / / \ \ \ ` < / / � \ ; / / f8,002 sq.ft. N ° I I I I I \ \ 4 \ I I _ L I I / / ts,893 sq.ft. / / \ \ , A \\ \ �° j / / �� \� 26u o 70 / l o l / 27 - - - // f8,253 sq.ft. t o I I \ o f7,896 sq.ft. \ \ J 55.0 55.0 L / / \ e / / � \ \0 / / / / / sal 9A / // ���° �� / 2 0 0 I I \ 55 SS.0 / 6 / / \ 6 \ \ 00 , / / f9 045 sq.ft. / // \ S\ / / / 2 / / \s� 8� l I / / / f8,683 ° 0'� 6 I Ic I 3 \ \ 4 / / t8,518 sq.ft. / / S a r7 1 1 \ / // o \ / (o / \ 3 0 _j L 1 1 l ° o 0 2 I I� f9,069 sq.ft. \\ 2 2 R=250.0 \ / �L \ cs \� / // / 357 SS / / / / \ O r z I t7,800 sq.ft. I I t8,255 sq.ft. I I \ \ i�� ' _ - - �2 _ 0 / `^�/ / 9 \ \ '�e ��q/ / �60 R. 33 2 - J / z 1 I I \\ \ / / STREET A ,,\ < / / / \ Fose \ \ / / / / / S4 0 I' 26•7 f243,345 \r.. / / / / �� aan e„ f+ \ \OQ \ \ ' >> \ / / 0 7 �o , % sq. ft. \ \ o ANT PJDGE DR NE I hereby certify that this survey, plan Print Name: Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: NJS Revisions: M / I HOMES OF M I N N EAPO LI S, L LC � CARLSONSURVEYINGENCSINEE1tINts or report was prepared by me or under my 1. 4/25/25 Per City& Watershed Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTHI MN 55449 p y g 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 PRELIMINARY PLAT of direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: ISSUE DATE: 3/4/2025 ENGINEERING PLANNING F-AX �. Licensed Land Surveyor under Lino Lakes, Minnesota i �N-ENI INEMNMCOM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/2025 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 957 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 / 15 Save Date: 04/25/251 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\survey\pre-plat\5412-03_preplat.dwg SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SANITARY MANHOLE O SMH MISCELLANEOUS SIGN -� EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION x0000.0 EXISTING TREE >� TELEVISION BOX Tv ❑o HYD FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE GV N H CLEANOUT co OEB I)• ELECTRIC BOX ❑ GAS METER GM O CATCH BASIN ® or ® ® or RAIN GUARDIAN EM R G ELECTRIC METER O TB TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE Im FLARED END SECTION FD HH STORM MANHOLE O 0 STMH SERVICE SRV o SOIL BORING/TEST HOLE TH STREET LIGHT RETAINING WALL WATERMAIN(- SANITARY SEWER ---- >----- > ----- > —��>— STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE CURB WETLAND ------------- ------------- DITCH UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS�- UNDERGROUND FIBEROPTIC- FENCE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE — I I L SINGE FAMILY 60 MIN. WIDE LOT PROPERTY LIN 25' COF SETBAC 30' E J-------------- 110' 1 BLDG 60' PAD NER -- 5, -----�*45' REAR SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKS GARAGE: 7.5 FT. HOUSE: 7.5 FT. CORNER: 25 FT. 25' FRONT SETBACK L1-4131, L1-11132, L1-13133, L1-23B4, L1-6135, L1-10136 30' FRONT SETBACK L24-35134 & L1-13135 - ;/W \ / v v I J to 1! \ a \\ 12 \ I \ MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE ID N \ \\ CURB & GUTTER O \ ANDALL STREET \ 5 / / / SAWCUT, MILL & MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS I I I DEVELOPER TO OBTAIN EASEMENT FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS I� / IE 880.70-NE IE 880.60-W MAINTENANCE .____ DRIVEWAY l I I I I 6 L-- / 5 / , I I \ / I \ � I I I /- I I , � I I I I I � \ I I I ----------- I \ I i \ I \ \ REMOVE PLUG & CONNECT p 0 EXISTING 16" DIP WATERMAIN W/16" G.V. & BOX MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXISTING TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC o,- SAWCUT, MIL & MATCH \ EXISTING BIT�JMINOUS \ FAMATCH \EXISTING CONCRETE \ 2 \ CURB &\ GUTTER \ \ y 5 4 \ 4 \ REMOVE & wISPOSE OF TEMPORARY \CLEAN OUT \ CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" PVC SDk 35 SAN -SWR EX. IE 901.961�FII`LD VERIFY) OUTLOT D I \ I \ I\ � I \\ I \ z I \ \ \ 0 50 100 200 I \ \ (IN FEET) I \ \ r-)rr. ir-Ni I d A r-ii EN%sINEEi�Mc; CARLSON �9FE10� ASANTi11 3 NE sITE1a I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE & 8 su�rvEYING IBLAM �L.48�.7 MIN 7s44 `W� direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: � //� - Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 Of ENGINEERING PLANNIN6 Fax 7W. 7 Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota UTILITY PLAN 1 5 CMfl-WNW-EN>�NEE�INGMM- the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 1 Save Date: 04 25 25 1 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_site.dwg # 5412-03 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE - - - EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE ____----___ BITUMINOUS CONCRETE �d SANITARY SEWER ---->-----> STORM SEWER WATER MAIN -- -I- -I DENOTES INLET PROTECTION OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 0 MANHOLE O HYDRANT HYD rnH 1 Gv GATE VALVE N ry TELEVISION BOX C TELEPHONE BOX UTILITY POLE n, RETAINING WALL FENCE x 10' CONTOUR -- 2' CONTOUR --- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE ---------- USACE WETLAND LINE ----------- vv.v 00.0 SPOT ELEVATION e x _e x - E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 43 03 x 000.0.... SILT FENCE •••• TREEFENCE ............ GRADING LIMITS AAAAAAAAAAAA - TREELINE SOIL BORING TP FEMA FLOODPLAIN FP FP RCWD FLOODPLAIN fP fP -w ro- I NOTE: ALL TOPSOILS REMOVED FROM BUFFER AREAS MUST BE STOCKPILED AND RETURNED AS CLOSE TO THE ORIGINAL LOCATION AS POSSIBLE. WETLAND SUMMARY WETLAND FILL = 84,479 SF (1.94 AC) WMC WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 197,699 SF (4.54 AC) REQUIRED WMC WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 18 4,3 01 S.F. (4.23 AC) CITY WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 21,895 SF (0.50 AC) REQUIRED CITY WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 11,311 S.F. (0.26 AC) WMC BUFFER WIDTH: AVERAGE WIDTH 50' (ft) *MINIMUM WIDTH 25' (ft) NOTE: ALL AREAS EXCLUDE PAVED TRAIL SURFACES) ) * UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CITY BUFFER WIDTH: 10' (ft) (NO AVERAGING) CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know what's below. Call before you dig. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level was determined according to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." // //'� \\ 13I \ \\\ / / ........ ........... C WETLAND BUFFER i ' \ / 1.........: ' 11.677 S.F. PRP. / ..ice'-�.'.'.'.'. . - 9 dNfilC WE BUFFER--, : %':':':•: \ �• 633 S.F. \ � RE , •'I 6.' / / Q• t•: 28 875 S.F RP. 6 / '.T \ / _ •.»'Y f.. r'•• i .i. � 27 fT�S.F. RE >- Q. 0 s. `11.3 2 i \ vv o� 1 s. d' \ rC - 5 I 'Y r 90fi '2 - - r � s o \ O, �'. 158 •.,_ 1 902 16 \ O II 8 I .s •.� 11 9 I I \ /i I� a � i I I0 I c HW �-0 161 R T1CAL 905 \ I \ - \ \, s O/ o890 OG } G S \\ / `� r.•.•.•.•.•.•``'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'• ...�. \ M , \ 914.0 G 914. G 914'0 / \\ 880 \ 4? y T: :;"y'+��� �. • ` 155 \ �N C WETLAND BUFFER 1 /'t \ N 12 v /.•.. A co z�x o. ox .... , �.... 3 336 S.F. PRP. 7 o. 1 8 sox oso a QB' V o o II s ...X......:, • 24,E 5 S.F. REQ. � :�:' �o�� ) I I WETLAND 30 i T ��A \\ -� I I Y rn Jo CRITICAL HWL 906.0� :;:�;:; :•i�•: :.:,. \ / (SNOWMELT) _ 2+ ' I --------- � t 9,� 3a � 'S o � 1'�3 I :� I� a � � Z�o \ \ \ 10 FOOT MIN. ;•, h - 3 _ > r s O m o J , I I o I ^. - oQ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' CIITY BUFFER NON WMC / •' °° / \ 12,118 S.F. PRP. (5,741 S.F. REQ.) / \ _ \ \ ..� �:.:.:,:,:;• � / O j��ii I- __ � / 73' I '-01 v b' I w / - -- �$ / o a COORDINATE TH GAS COMPANY / _ 194 4 \ \ / \• To� of I- UK' 82 UTILITY �r: "FF/`r \ s. "- / C� -, -1- --� y/ Ian aoo$ 9 IN5fA TION MUST HAVE 4 T:•' / ( /� O r- --_ I oin + I 9ozo I I•:• 1 _ 09 \ F T OF VEg, FOR STREET 521 O --, / 1 175 / I /+ " - - J Y & � I \ s \ CFOSSING ANA 2-FEET OF \ h/ -� ( O �/, / \\ EPARATION F ANY PIPE t • o°< i s J-✓ ; ^�' \O rn Ice --- - I \ SING �0ss c5 L S n sos\ 'b \ - - 10 FOOT MIN I I TOP OF \BUFFER \� i • C9 � \ CITY NON WMC BERM o /\ \ b '•J �i• I 1 � / / 1 I h � ce � \ ��•' _ � I 9 � 7 S.F. PRP. 1 _ N L 1 \ - \ a' �. 5 57� S.F. RE _ _ I I aQ• s \ ) ( I \ \ � \ I o L_ _ / � ---- o �-�-- /1 o I I`LAKE 300 w '•:��: •.RIP -RAP AT I 1 \ \ � �. - -_ / - ,no I ' • v OUT r� 'PfP. I \ \ \ r- _ -,zs-- I 1 a ° O m I NWL = 902.0 ':�:':':':�:�'�'�'•'•'•' =�T /;•'••••.s! \ \ \ \ ,+• 11':� ___ 1 1 •cp\ o fI o I I I � \ / ' CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 I ° WETLAND 35 - c� to I ,� O o _ _ \ - \ SNOWMELT {CRITICAL HWL = 906.1 (SNOWMELT) WMC WETLAND BUFFER I I -POND �9 \ \ %.1' /:'' 1 0, � \ a / ° }_ c \ \ r l (SNOWMELT) / N rig' L� - 9 66/ s 32,222 S.F. PRP. \ \ e\°x o s� z �o00 5. (32,188 S.F. R�,�- _ \ \ -- ---- � _- \ -_-r• / m J ° ° ,• • I (CRITICAL HWL 906.6 \ \ \ \` ::� • r`•' of aw _ - 17 \ ' ` \ '� 0 6 o s , es��\ WETLAND 55 � 90 u.: I I (SNOWMELT) \\ ° \ \ \\ �� •'s.3 �----,z.o _ o \ a r� � _,�'� \ � /o � ss � CRITICAL HWL = 904 �;� I I. _ \\ r \ or__ �R (!1p �\ \ �p / ss \ °' o°o °'0 RIP -RAP AT as -e s----- \ . • •.ti . r w p / o h >� / \ TOP OF OUTLETS TYP. /. RIP -RAP AT \ \ . ••/ N i g16.o \ o BERM ( ) (100 YR) / t.• \ TOP OF '•r. _ i EOF / I OUTLETS (TYP.) \ BERM � '� �;;'y!: I / �, \ '.�, `:..•.' 1149, o \ , / .� \ , / I �Q 't /�P /_ o>o � D :;y y',..•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•., °'•'•'•�'�-------------- ___ �h •, \ •�ry I .1 ,z�' I. \ / �.q ., /, \, (gOgS I 2,297 F // � \ ;/ ;:•.•.. / I _ / ^ \ o. !' ao / \\ :�'• . I � ! /i `.' / s �i i 1, I gp8.5 \ , / \ 'mil=-� pp ' .•, �/ r.•.•.•.•. •. "''''•T P OF os.o J • WEND FILL ,os of 09.0 P.'.'.'.'.'. / t RP r------ r - . -- 5 6,1 SF �\ \ ( \ �!� SO(,1 / i' / ^ 1 \ / \\ I t 1 \> 06° ° s Tfps'• •'r if. �•. •'•: �`5 �/ , _______ \' \\ `\ I 4$ y�, s ►;. °5 134,= \. ; " \l ' �_ • • . • \ v \ / I ^�. \ , s r' - 6 / / y% WETLAND FILL p • o \ \ \ o ` Joa. 1 q \ roP of 11,565 SF ' °° \ OG\ a 1 / ^.� 38 e. • \\ I sO; g /$- - / \ - \\ BERM �_ 06 `..... �.;.;.;.;. 9 . �::.;.;.• t.•.•.'.• t''•'•' sr \ --- r g ` 0 / / \•• •• \\ \ I o�/�\ O \ sib' �� / SOOT (908S g ', 1,87 SF._�\a ?'� O ��� 906o i.'.'. js� / \13 0 • w 147 \ / / M L s \ s s S �]', 90 (JI .;./RIP-RAPINSTALL EROSION \ , •S / o o AT oa o / \\ O `�� so: s G s , sa p s sp OUTLETS (TYP.) - - ��/ CONTROL CAT. 20�::: �QORDINATE WIT"AS CO NY a O'�'I } «, ALONG SLOPES SOG SOG N i / /s G' L__06p r ! 1 1 �� P i INSTALL EROSION ' c ,� ,• FOR SiT & UTILT� ,� 1 / 8� - 7 gog / 18g _i �191 \I r } 1 8 / 1 \ 10o`�x o�6-ox 10 e / / 1`,i o• INSTALLATION -MUSST HAVE 4 ° \ 1 46 CONTROL CAT. 20 91 0 -- 8 I o / G 914.3 G 914.3 I i., G - \ v N SF fM s+75 �! \ y. / ' / ••�• a / t� PP M � G �" 1 1 ,..•r.•.'.•.•.•.•.•.• •... o l -r ALONG SLOPES � � -� a o. \ c, / tr / / FEET\OF COVE FOfi�TREET 1 `/ , O / ,.,o' �y o,so zo+� A .., < ry \°e? oso.�fLp, � 1 (�08.5 I �•« �'' �' ' S a�NrA� j �� • v.o. Y\ CROS�NG AND 2-FEF/ OF 31 f• ,� r / 9 ON F \CROS�� ,p 6� / t:G G/ / -- I (g0a5 1 .•.,%��:•� / \ ` 1 • •SEPAR W ,moo e ' - '( 3.2 R� \ • \ / '• 145 1 I WO I 1 916.0 ° !` -st g13 _ \ C'ti;(� / / • • `� Y / \/1 \ G O ( O8. / I 1 G • ,1too .tQ` 91ti \ a I 2 /\ ` \ V - / • • • • . • \ / ' ,�' / / / \ \ \ 0 918.G _ _-_ _ / // 6 ,a�\-- � �•G TS 5 tl 91 It s�a_J �/• � � � �� \,. sox /osox 123 �i 6 / \, / • nooa 6 (9 ) g.0 (' {' .\ / / .i _ y. \ G+•y. / 1 43 !1 44 \ oi` %o'•�''a / j S 4 / s _� `s�.. \ \ G 7� I I I 91s.5 .o ; / 3' / , o \ 1 5 \ \ / 7? \ S / i --_-_ \ \ •• ` \ S �J./ 7S 09 9 W 6 % ✓� / 1R. G N \ 913• \ 1 1 .' I I "; •• Q OCi /^ �" 0 � � v S I I 1 I - - �' , 1 Oi �.'s� � gx I I � \ \ o`A \ , ' S �a 123� J 1 art \\ / / OCate" G 914.4 \ \ S -' \ ---/ ` •o \\ c • / SOG I I SOG ( � / x J � S 1 g 5 ' _ G � 5 OG - I S °` .., \ yam_ 91 w 0 / t' \ // iQ g S \ ~• `tieoo `sroo_ °6 in r G g °m9 \/ G _ 4.3 I ' G _ g1-k _ � '•• `.i / 112 i 11,' / / e ° s / l� ' 1/ '\ C � � .c• //'' � G SOG I `\126/ °ae oo' \\ \ sip / rR �^ ��\440• `-1 _ \ rr.E I \ ``�� \ \ \ � ..• ••. \\ / \\, � _J L - '"�� \ oze s,o -_ �Q 27 � �-' � •' ,�\ r � � o ��8� ,�� ..,. ; ., i1'�• � oB \I0 /'� fr • • ° \ '2 / Or1 /o"h• o' M N�o * •r'oaio • \ • .:.. Di.. 2 \ / �O° / l�S G. g17.0 1 1 WO mo gOG� o 8 / W O i3.o I Iz.o rp�p BUFFER p�?;.;:;ti.'e;•;•:.� s•� • / / / / G 97 / /� '- \ \ 97.01 11 � I \ \ /,�; .;�.,.; / O L \129 _ 128 5 a9 J o \ \ g 1 yo/. . st_2 2% :\ \\mp s mo t / 1 � ) \..�.• \`�.' y : •t // ` 0 / / / 917I I I I 917. t 1 O (90 i I „, \s // M k\ G G \ /,;..•.,.,...•.;,. I t;..• / 0 G 917.0 9.5) 909.- i\ � / \ soa \LOW AREA• %� \ \ a / _ - 71 9 \ S \' i s Z s� ) _ _ 1 \ _J o5�r............. i- / c /- # \ .'a,.......•.� \ �... �8 •, / 00 / 1 909.5 `-- 1 1 I __05_- y. o ... CRITIC LHWL = 906.2 •.\\ \ / / % 43 0l L 1 G ) %::: :, WETL 25-B .. • a • I •\ \ '^ 913� \ -\ \ �y ,.p . - ITICAL H - 905. :�::'• - - \ L_ ' \ % SNOWMELT 9 , G G \ \ v \S sos. S \ (SNOWMELT) I . L ( �\ 1 3 540 SF 0 � 1 - \ / / •o I 1 I I - / I I L / / 9 \ / •',+ .I� �19 _III I - " \ �.;:;.;. \ N S �> WETLAND BUFFER - --- I •: ��' �. �' SIGN TYP. / m os.> > °y--\ y...... WMC WETLAND BUFFE \ 1'''''' soa , .« \ �. �.. \ 19,529 S.F. PRP. • ... / (19,238 S.F. REQ.)LLJ a' 1 • \ L . C WETLAND BLIFFER I W � / .e-�� \ 70,060 S.F. PRP. / •''f•.•.v ,.�� v•.•.•.•.•.•.• \ (69,58RS.F. REQ) �.....;.... 1 / WETLAND 15 a \ C CRITICAL HWL 904.7 es� \ WETLAND FILL ' \ I :;:;: ; .;:;:;: / r........\\ \ \� / 00 H J \ 13.84i SF:� ' (SNOWMELT) N z of I / / /✓ .....'..... J WETLAND 25- I' ' '• 1 CRITICAL HWL 9 .5 t'•'. • .' ��t;.;;;:: �\ \ / \ rr •, N \ ------ \ / EOF (SNOWMELT) �1 WETLAND tom \ \ \ o - ---- , CRITICAL HWL = 907 t -\ (SNOWMELT) SHEET 12 \ IL_J / I I I �_ \`� \ /10 Ir CqLJ NQ 1 12w 1 ... z 0 50 100 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK =j 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 - Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 - Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) ENGINEERING CARLSON 3#PHEASANT iilli[RNE SUITE =I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH 9 SURVEYING BLAINE, MIN 55449 TEL7W.4M79M direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: //� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 GRADING INDEX of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX �. Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 15 CARLSON the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03-grade.dwg A 4 , ,,,, 7r J`71 G-U I"' •w � - - = f -� ' ' /I v 1 � 1 / / h _' �- \ I. +lam . ,�, 1 1i 5 "�' CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 ' I o •• \ �' p / / 171 _ - , SEE SHEET 11 I++' '♦'irf+i 35 •• �n , o (SNOWMELT) •.• ♦. •,.,f, •• I 1 V (j/ O I V 1 I / N / 906.1 �'.i 0 I I-�U / p 0� Ic9 II _ 1 _ t�J \ U O •i fii �+J i LO ELT)I cn Nam- NI� �� 12.9 \ �° / O 166 s, �� ago ' 4�1 • 1 - - • • • L_ 5J� r �� / \ • • - - EOF o_ w I - 0000 - - - - - �\ \ I \ \\7A� �\ o� o ��s •• °q5.3 O - - 12.0 - N I � \\ 17 �lo� \ \ IJ / \\ ` 14.5 _/�\ \ � `�O �, /0 1p \ O, 96 2 ` ap ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ +,+,+ •' �''' '' o - - - - - co vv vQ / / 9 6 i �� o v> / ° '° RIP -RAP AT a a ♦ .... . ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + I 0TOP OF , • •�•� .• . • I I W O // (A � / // I O� \ / / 16.0 \ ` O /' / BERM o OUTLETS (TYP., ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �.... G� 79 / \ / / `0 WETLAND FILL./'167� _ - ago ,♦,♦,.,,,,, •� v / I ono o y • I �� _ l \ / e,.. \ 9 \\/ / 19Q I 2,297 (iF / -�\ �° I> ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 /% 0./ 8.S / 1^\ , ♦ + r + r + r + . + . + • CO \ I / 6 V ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 0 / / �J \ 6� / / ^ F�F ♦ ir• +rf++r + r 0 ♦•♦i♦� i++.i++.i+ + `169 9�0.� ` o, RIP -RAP AT \ 90 02 �' + + • . • . • ♦ • ♦ •♦ • + + + + + + \ �'\ O /� OUTLETS (TYP.) \ k° ••,.+.,.,.,.,., ,�� 1..... S� s 9 /�, �Ii \ WETLAND FILL '♦'+'.'♦'.'♦'����/// �+'♦'+'♦'+ ♦', , 08.5 I y \ 11,565 SF F`,+++++•••+••• +.'+'+'+'+'+ +'•'+ '0 \� 2 / 0° % / / / \ h8 0�1 / ` V \ TOP OF 906 • , ♦ . • • �♦ . ♦ . ♦i0 \\ I / / / i %% O 2 \%Q. ^' l l BERM • '♦','.',' ♦,'♦','♦','♦ '. , ,(ter+ . + + f+♦+f \ 09 I I ( 0 �i / /'� O \ •� / / 911 0 //�����` / TLAN FILL O "/-% O� ` \ k°'° k° • a♦+.i♦•y ,'.'+'.'+'.'+ . , • , • '. • .'• .'•'+'♦'+'♦'+ O / / / / f \\ 9% 0 6 \ / O l �9Q` • S l l 7 1 , 877 SIF \ � I O • O \ O� • , . , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ . . _ , ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , \ /i\ � /1 \\ V / / �j9'�•` � ^ � �\\ 9 � O � \ � 906� i�♦+i./ i.♦+i.♦+i.♦+i.♦•i.♦•i.♦•i.♦•i.♦•i.♦•i.♦•i+♦♦i+♦♦ + V06, g \ \ 147� \/ / \ �J %j, Q M \ � I �� 8ag6+ . � � -� °% • •+. ' __r . f . f . f , , , , , , , , , , , , , , + , + , l9%�� i.� p6•p • + ►+�rf++rf++rf++rf+. .+i..+i.. +.. +.i++.i++. + . A ` / \ _ RIP -RAP AT -� •• NSTALL EROSION �,..,i�.♦fi.♦fi.♦R` ♦fi.♦fi.♦fi.♦, . i.♦,i. , . O �� \ \ 5 Q M l / q/ %Nk \ \ _ G / �� 8 G�� //^�\ 9°8 / ,°`9 ` i OUTLETS TYP 06'p ' - - • • CONTROL CAT. 20 I�'f++rf++rf++rf++rf++rf++rf+�r ++rf++r ++ ♦++.♦+ ( J -q� + ♦ f ♦ f ♦ f . f . f . f . COORDINATE WITFI\GAS COMPANY\'s 9, \ / 1 91s. , / ' / °� _ _ _ - - _ , - - r\� `" 1 �� •� ALONG SLOPES • • • • • • • �4 \ FOR SIRE T & UTILITY , \ 1 �� �R \'s X°cy 2' - 9� �9Q99 / 18 \> p �191 I I I � .♦..+.+...+.,., ,., . INSTALLATION - MUST HAVE 4 146 \ , / / hoo �2s / / / / 190� I �I I 9os.o O ,�... + + + + + . + . . + . pis �R / •. FEES\OF COVER FOf� TREET / \ sO / qo"o �;;�° \ ' J c ,l, \06 p6 p - ,� I I (g0g.5) ,�, «,++ ++ +++♦ ♦�♦+++.. •.♦.. \�M\N / -Y • / / sog\+oo 29 / Gl/ 9 &7 2--a111ETLA L 1 g0$.o i.♦+. .+. .+. +iy�+♦+i+ +� 5 e / �k 00 CROS�NG AND 2-FEET OF / , (� / / o®o o� �` �� p� � 9>> / 9 9 / / - - 15 312 gps.5) �. "� Q� r ...... 3 f ♦ r + r + + r + •.SEPARATION FOR ANY PIPE %\` ,�� / / �� 7, - Fo 3 Q -� .o l \ I I 188 I 1189 I �0$.0 w0+ ''6.�,�. 222 \ I '� 1 } . • + Jar + + + • / • + ' CROSSI N % � � I Op / V u / \ •° • • \ 4 145 \v / �O / \ \ ®= �� \ sc2 \ f / /,,' \�i , I I �♦+ems/♦ a%9 _ / / i�i i% / �\°• ♦♦'.'♦ • ' • • • : • ' . T\ o / O\°� / p 12.0 \ A c l�Q i 9Q9S /I-------� g0$•5 I WO I I G 916.0 �t ♦ / / ___� \� ,�� ',�+�,♦+ \ \ • • uT \' \ �° h / / - - 123 ' 2®\9\ F� ��, J / 97 91�0 9.0 I �g09'0� I G g16.0 w - --- - / / / / �•-`%�� ,,�� 1� i.♦. 4 ,o. ,moo• / 9�3 1 / / X, I I _ 10.o joo . • \ 4 71004 • \/ \ / •8 \� \ /8 O•`22 S j 'S (9 .5) I g16 0 I ,� F_g14 \ \ 906.10 • C / 914 \ \ ,3 °°\ C, `S `S6 \ / I G \ o_ J - �� i �� / 0 ♦' . \ / / • e" PIPE • % off° o \ N g / 2 1� l O I W O I i I I _ . 9 PY 12+75 144 •. o X�ryo / ,� �� �s �. �, I I 12. EL. 9,�.75 >r,; .0 __ �,2,, �2• , _ I I \ • T • �'�,�o,� / \ SO / 97 p \ 90\ W0 I 916.5 I 5 ' .- �' p % f 0 G ' V ) / Ir - \ \ \ / (� / `� M. / S Q �/ / \° F ►� • S I c; - I �3•a _ - '6�° / g1 / ` \ • . e`�,`j`'° / /°s\ So•9js 2s _-I \ G 917(0 W c5 \ • • • E ' p� �`� \ c0 / h V / 9%% \� \ \ C �� g16 I �1[< / 70%� W N •• • oo /\N / 0 / 0 1 / �,� I L_ %=�I-� �{°jp- = S� I I OG • \ r / < / C / / c / / x°° 15 3 ' - 14.7 1�k°\ y G I I S \ '\` e• IPE • • • 113 / // �� \ / /\ / 0 / y\ 'S8 ST/QFc ��' \ �� 6 �3k1 5 12.2 W I w 4 0 / ��� • • • r \ IC �� 0 6� E g13 C 9\ 91 \ V V O g0 W G / / > 914 3 I G 9 / 9 loci • • \ / / 112 / / 1 1 / 9 09 S S \ / \ 9, ��,s+oo 15+00 cwn 9j i / G !77-7- -1 - ad�.4s - - - _ _ / < 2. Q G /\ \ �s 1. - - - �'- I I _ _ - C3 ' �/ S ,� f I PIPE • - / 14•gQl 0 \ ^ I O�♦•,+♦♦,+♦ ,+ 1 C J � V /� • T 71008 \ • > ..•. . 8�\ / "970 14.3 917 •0 I I 9,° 1Z J0�' 0 ! p�8 ♦ .'♦'.'♦'.'♦'.'♦'.'♦ . ♦ '♦'.'♦ .' \/ / • 9°4.,° -�\, .•�;�,�. •. 06,,' �\ / // 9p9.0� / •`� �- 14.9 14.6 - - IA I G ••O °8 1�\ g�� C.�• + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + S+oO /•• LO BUFFER Q�• • •>la'y� / / \� / / G / \ 1 -/ O I I I 9 °$� • + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + . + . + .U. + + + - 4+00 0 �, >',�.,�.',�.• < v 9 / I 917 I 0 I , r r + r + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �2. - - �� v�' • SIGN TYP.� ��.�.�.�.�.�.�. � '�� °6 1 0� / 1�S / I I �/ G I 4. /f . . f . f . f . i� , . , . , . , . , + , + , + r + r + + r + r + r + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + G v/'�� v A �� • ��, vv / / / J / 7•0 G 917.0 I gp9.5i 909• �I %�\ OEl • • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + . + . + + + + + + + + 12.6 J' O • \ 1 ' ' ' S �J� 5 + . • . • . • . • . • + • . • , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + + + ♦ ♦ . ♦ + - 12.3 �• \ \ \ . . .. . . . •' A 1 . . • • 108 \ / / / QQ� 0� I / I I �g��'� I I 1 01 ao6�� /�• + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + . + . + . • . . • . + . • , ♦ , ♦ , G v • o v I I .'+'+'+'+'+'+'+'+'•'+'•'+'•' . .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.� (� 1 �\ WETLA 25 B o g13 � - • • . 908\ \ / / < �,,, S �9p9.5 9og•5� 1 09' ; I 1 02 EX. .-�.-�-....- ................. . . . ♦ , ♦ , ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ � . . (� 1 \^' ITICAL H 905. • / n I + r + r + r + r + r + . + . + . + . • . . • . • . • . • . • + • + • + • Q + 9 .3 914.0 G \� r` v \ / • . i . \ \ I • \ / 909. Q (909.5) g09 •o I J 05 % + . + . + . • . . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . ♦ + + ♦ + . + . + . + . + . + . + . Ld • + 14. �G W \ "✓1� -�14 :;:;:;:a;. / I _ Ex, ♦„ ,,,,.,.,., ♦,♦,♦,♦,♦,♦,. ................ o , j \ �T (SNOWMEL\ ,°' 9090 \ 103 ,..,♦,♦,.,...... ,.,......... ............... ' i T� J • . + • + + • + r + r + r + r + r r + r + . + . + . . • . • . • . • . • . • . • + P \ \ / • \ l I. . • • \1 �7 L -_�I I I I I t02\ _ X p(j 3 . . + . + . + . , . , . , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 J lI ♦ . ♦ , ♦ ♦ , . . . . . . , . . , , , . . ♦ . Q U / I V \ / • • > T V • • ° S V 1 0 6 I I gpa V p6 4 s ' + + + + + + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + . + / SSG I I I I \ ` ,�.��:�'�'�'� \ v�,;.a.�.a��.�.ay. 105 EX. , ,,,.,.,.,♦,♦,♦,♦,♦,♦,♦,.,.,.,. Qo ' ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . SO 115 > ���� �� .... EXo _ + + + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + r + r + r + r + r + r + r + . + . + v • �� ,�, �9 1\' a' • • • 7.2 - \ i , . , f ♦ f ♦ f . f . f . f . f . f . f . f . , I I I I A / / • . . > , . \ ��• EX J X'p6.9 + + ♦ + r + r + r + r + r + r + r + r + . /J I I I � J V A / • • °.� A o ���� �6.8 p6•C•i L � .♦. �. . •f.�ff.�ff.��f.�ff.��f���f.�• . / ------ I I ------ ' 116��- I I \ • • .. �/� v �' .. ��' �' . • - \ WETLAND BUFFER 118 � --� . • ..°� vv \�9 .:��'�� sicN TYP. .... ....... •�-�' �-----� �/---�v� � 05.7 ••••• �� / / v 10.0 • • _'� � � vv 4 WMC WETLAND BUFFE • • • .. 908 • .. • • . • �- \ \ \ i .�. / \ 19,529 S.F. PRP. \n • • • v �l �,/ I v v • • • • • • (19,238 S.F. REQ.) 9'' C WETLAND BUFFER-- v 70,060 S.F. PRP. ' w z . . . �� �s • 7�1► \ �.. T A 907.0 �m m \\� \ (69,587 S.F. REQ.) SB 1 /00, .. . . . . . . . .. \ . . . . . .I 1 WETLAND 15 Q / / CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 M I 05 CV (SNOWMELT) N z OI I .�'.. WETLAND 25-A �\ v "' °' v v .... -� _ " ..a �................... �.. v V `� v�. 1 N v CRITICAL HWL 905.5 N v EOF (SNOWMELT)a. \v x O \ V" COX Cox Ai�x�X� \\\ ` `T \ �/ QQ\� 0 0 0 25� 5\\� 100 -x�x for^ xU'0 \' (IN FEET) x 0 -- -- -- - \ BENCHMAR�I 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 - Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) \J N 2. - oka Coun y Bend rk No. 2012 Elevation 911.80 ft. 88) d;­ 3 #PHEASANT RIMIGE DR NE Revisions: i CARLSON SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Drawn: KRO 1. 4/25/25 Per City & Watershed Comments M / I HOMES OF M I N N EAPO LI S, L LC 1 0 ENGINEERING SLAINEsMN or report was prepared by me or under my NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY GRADING SURVEYING direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: BJK TEL�.4� p y 2 -� g 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 0 ENGINEERING PLANNING IFAX� � Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CAM-SQN-ENiINEEMN65MM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 15 5 Save Date: 04/25/251 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwg # 5412-03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • r • r • r • r • r • r • r ♦ ♦ r I . . . . . . • . • . ♦ . • . r . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . . r • . • ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . r ♦ r ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ • . • . • . • . r ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ I • , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , , , , , • , • , • , • , • , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , , , , , , , , , • , .♦ r� • r. r. r. r. r. r r r r r♦ r♦ r r• r• r• r• r• r♦ r r r r r r ♦ W r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ • r• r• r• r r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦ r♦♦• r• r • . r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r • . • . • . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . • . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ '. ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . r ♦ r ♦ r I ♦ . ♦ ♦ • ♦ , . , . , . , . , . , . ♦ . ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • , . , . , . , . , . ♦ . ♦ ♦ . ♦ • ♦ , . , . , . , . , . ♦ . ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ , . , . , . , . , . , . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ • ♦ f ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r • r • r • r • r • • r • r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ . • . r . r . r . . . . . . • . • . • r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r . . . . . . • . • . • . • . ♦ . . ♦ . • . • . • . r . r . / • r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r • r • r • r • r • r • • r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r \ \ ♦ . r r r r r r r r r r r r ♦ . • . r . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . • . • . • . ♦ . . • . • . • . r . r . r \ • r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r • r • r • r ♦ r • r • r • ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ . • . r . . . . . . . . . . . r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r . • . • . • . • . • . • . ♦ . . • . • . r . r . r . . . . I , ♦ , . , , • , • , • , • , • , • , • . , . , . , ♦ , ♦ , . , . , , . • , • , • , • , • , • , "7906- -� • . • . • . . . . . . . . OS • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . \ / ♦ . ♦ . • ♦ . \. ♦ ♦ , C WETLAND BUFFER / • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . . . . . ♦ . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . r ♦ . . • . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ r .-._, ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦? 1 6 7 7 S• F. P R P • ♦ . ♦ . r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ T�r�-r �--r-♦-it ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦ r llliii ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦ 1,633 S.F.REQ• J ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' ♦ ' is t ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦�i1- r a i ♦ i ♦ i ♦ ♦ ♦ . . ♦ ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ -♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ , . r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • j�� \ 11.3 _"11.8 i ••�. • • .• . •. • • a ♦ ♦ .11.5 1.5 ., � 1.0 .2 '• ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ .10 r . . . . . . ♦ . 9..♦I.4♦pQ. r . r - 10.5 -- --o. • ♦ ♦ ♦ [\ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r • r • r • r • r ♦ r • r • r • r • r • • �,I �, o ` >> � ��5 A� � � 1 9 160 o8s /158 902-- r. r. r.. .... .•.•.•.•.•.•.\♦. ♦♦ . r. r.... a ' a • . r ♦ r ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . • • cn , �------1 ; Ir-- -- �- �- / � ,,i. i. o . , .♦,♦ ♦, ♦♦,,♦♦,,.♦,♦♦♦,,.♦,,.♦♦,,.♦ ,i.,,i.,,i•,,i•,,i 900 • I / ��" O \ �� I I / / y161` • . r . •�.i♦�.i♦�.i♦�.i♦\r� r♦.ir♦.i.♦.i.♦.i.♦.i.♦ 890 0 SqG SOG • . • . • . f . . . , . , . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . . . . . . . . . . . •• `\ 156 \\1 V 1 / J I I _M I l 0 90,�/ / \ s . ♦ ♦ . ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ +I ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . . 914.0 �L��77_ � _� 914.0 ` . ♦.♦♦r♦r♦r♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ • - �, \ _� G 914. G 914' 0 G / / / \ sso ........... ... . ••y O�� \ \ 12.2 11.8 L -T- �4S / 162 \ 11.5 11.1 • r r r r r r♦ r r r =;•;>;�;a;�;a� • �s. 1 0 \� G.B.0+50 P� 11.3 i \ \ 870 ♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦.♦.♦..♦.♦.♦ • . • . • . • i y ��•�> , '� ` 15 5 \1 (l NP EL. 911.65 EL. 910.75 �� �' i9p �- _ r r r r r r r r r ♦ r . .........♦♦♦♦♦♦ / • ♦ 01 r ♦ r • r • r • r • r ♦ r ♦ ♦ r • I 1_20% I 0.60%0.60 % \xo✓ '' cS �J ♦ , o �� (� / O r . ♦ AND 30 • �� 0 I O, I ®_� 11.3� / • �Q�W . . • . • . • . • . • . • �I 0 to p0 STR T °9 \ / I . •. L`] �� 0\ '.'... ♦. ♦. HWL = 906.0 .. 54 I +N> 912- Fie. 3�°° �/ I Y �� _ �o ♦ •• I V' ! O� - - N r �a.' •• N�o - - --- - - -_ - - 11.1 \�63 I .♦'. QJ O_ Z WMELT) '♦ ♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦' co 0♦ z Wa'' 00 • • / \ N o - I 174 -•CN c� O a �N � ' • / � O I N / N � �-_JI / / rnII r� i cr I �.♦ II O a �' 7\300) 0 0 + 4 • of U' _ L L - Cn • � � 3.4 V - - - - - �- �•�i cn164 o I I w • • � / _�� ^cV � I _ / y-- - - - - I � O U1 +a � 907.0 � •.' I Q • . 52/ •�• LL / I \ I (P ♦.• ,. ,.,,�.. ♦•,�.. ♦,,�. I VI . ♦,f.♦,f. �♦♦ i♦♦•O�•i♦♦♦•♦r•+♦ ♦ . , ♦ , , • � '� � N I t '- W O � � 1 t0 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ l ♦ O . . . . • • of l _ 0 M °' _ _ 12.9- - - _ _ / o) �l 70)1, �: •. o -\__ _ _ �2.s- -�- / _---____ a rn /I r� in LAKE 300 b i.♦ I a Wz 0 ' �• �' ••; --_� � o _ - NWL = 902.0 ► CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 r_J35 _ I ,'♦ ; a° ♦'.:;'♦:,'. ' CD 0 �y SNOWMELT 06.1 a,, a ♦. ,�,,,, • • �15 01 0 0 1 L c� ELT) 1 (n r) �0> , �'� _---- O - ° ^� 166/ �� o o •' •' • • 1 NO� 12.9 - . . . . •• _ - - of � I - - - - - - �-\\ \ \ \\ (flJ'(,17 %R3 ��' � o) � � O �9 8(96 8� ' ♦ +♦ •+♦♦♦+ •• 05.3 O 12.0 - \\ 17 �I o� / \ ` 14.5 / \ `�V , / o o O) 96 ` a0 •'♦ •'♦'•' • • _ _ _ _ - - - N o \\ \� / 9 - \ o \� / o� o RIP -RAP AT a o ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ z . . . . . . . . •. • i o W I CO� / W 0 \ / % \ p9\ \ / 6 _ \ O Dcb / TOP OF o 4 . . . ♦ . ♦ . �.' , .' • . I ' it I �� ,, �/ ,/ BERM OUTLETS (TYP.) • • • I 0 \•� / I \ �� / ` G \ / - - - ♦ Q ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 0 25 50 100 179 / \ / WETLAND FILL' $ r ♦♦♦♦♦r.r.r. r.r.r♦ • 11 0 / \\ / \ \ / / n 0(9 2 297 `�F / �6. o> . . ..y . . . . . IN FEET S) $•5 \ \ \ / / / / - ♦ D p D . ♦ . . ' 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ / .• ...... •.•.• • O I �� o i / \ / / xos 9p0 . �p per. .�.�.�.� r.�♦�.�♦�.�, \ 169 s,°., o RIP RAP AT o 02 .•••.•.•.,. ♦♦ ,♦♦♦ ♦ r . r . . 0 j \ 1;00 OUTLETS (TYP.)OF \� ko� ••.,,.,.,.,,,�,�� �,,,♦, ♦ S� °8'S s 41 WETLAND FILL >,•.,.,� �`,,•, �I 08.5 11,565 SF 04, �♦>♦•••r•••r•• >•'•'•'•'•'• •'•'• ♦ • �O9\2x )�� TOP OF906 • •p♦>♦•••r•• ••••♦•••♦ • •'•' 0ry�/// BERM • >♦'•'♦'•' �•'♦'•'♦'•'♦ '♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦♦♦•♦ 0 \ 9 / / /�����` TLAN FILL O X°� k♦♦♦•♦'••� •♦♦♦•♦♦♦•♦♦♦ ♦ • r • • '• • •'•'•'•'•'•'•'• °6, / Dc / <9o8s � � 1,877 sF. �" O D �,� °� >•♦•♦� •♦•♦•♦•••• '••♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦• ^ J • ♦ • • • • ♦ , ♦ , ♦ , ♦ ♦ ♦ y\ 0 Ni ` ..♦.♦.......♦>>♦ r . . . . . . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . . . . . . R \ / \ � � s� � � L l �' �� o 1 \°o ` RIP -RAP AT � _ , -i � NSTALL EROSION \\ / / S �� ° \� �� ` \ \ \\ _ s.o / �� / /gb8s �/ sob �o� \� s.o - - • • / CONTROL CAT. 20 •♦'••♦'••♦'••♦'•,` ♦••♦♦••♦♦••♦♦. ♦ •♦♦.•♦ . \ /x so,9i� e 9 \ OUTLETS (TYP.) - ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „♦ s 5.�, /o T / o i - _ - _ _ - - �� �f • •� ALONG SLOPES �'............... • , COORDINATE WITFGASCOMPANY ' _ 06. _ '� •.•.•.•.•♦•♦•♦•♦ ♦• FOR STREET & UTILITY \\ �/ �' �� 2� (90o o / 18��° - ��191� ,�`♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦ ♦•♦ INSTALLATION - MU HAVE 4 ° 146 / O O /�� ° \ \ / 60 - O p6 / I 11 I 9VCl.Q Ox :► r�.i.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' '• •'•' '• •'•' ' �RP�� ���.50•' .P / \S / �o� \ 2'S / SEE SHEET10 / - 1900� I ,,,,,,•,•,• •., ,., os •. FEE�OF COVER FOI�STREET / / 0 / / ao"o /��° 0 20 �2� c , ,�, 8.� \°62 p6-°-�111ETLAL I I I o (so8.5) / 4♦ «,••>•••>♦•••♦♦• .�i♦••♦• •♦•. ♦ \�```A�N / • / / �� / ��°�� \ 0 60g\Xoa s P / VQ 1 9 •i,•••�•••�•i• .iy�.�.i. •i✓• 5' 6 0 3�QPHEASANT RME DR NE 1.4Revisions: 2M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 11 CARLSON SUITE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Drawn: KRO 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY GRADING ENGINEERING RLAINEs MN or report was prepared by me or under my SURVEYING direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: �_ /L Designed: B]K of TEL7�3.4�7 -� 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 ENGINEERING PLANNING IFAx� � Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CARLSQN-ENQNEEfflIN,=M the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 15 Save Date: 04/25/25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwg A 4 7t J) t1G-V - _ T \ _ �• I 06.6\ \ �.�. ETJ cD � 17\ 1 SEE SHE3 Og RITICAL HWL9061 WETLAND 35 lc(3x) II ,>O t? _ . nWMC WETLAND BUFFEpGND 500 \ 5 a.• I32 222 S.F. PRP. t- WAR- \ ) 12.9 I 61 ICRITICAL HWL 9(32,188 S.F. REQ. O\ �R (SNOWMELT WETLAND 55 12. 14. . CRI. iICAL HWL - 904� _ --- \ - �� p -895- - \ I 04.1 , •' ' RIP -RAP AT \ \ �� �:•' '•' • I (� `� o ' /� /� - 43<3 x �� 100 YR .. � \ \ / EOF ) ,ii > I OUTLETS (TYP.) \ ' B°RM°F 9 \ i ;� • _ O \ \ ... I \ ii.. 14 79 i 908 / O°• \ 09 !' , �1299'1• T P OF 0 09.0 os.o . WETLAND FILLSO ERM • � 6,132, SF • •' •>• 1�x'`��� Og 513,. \ t.o 4/ 095� • -4 148 �J08. �I SOG\ , ,�� 38 •. \ �\ ?° xo 0 10.2 / \ \ �- \ S \ r'P I ^ " Spy, / is / / . `\ `9 \ I \ \ I / / O / ,•81 \� \ •O / / � / S OO 9103.0130 G \ I <,3 ,�pG/ g1�13 147 c11• , '• \\ \ 9 \ ' 3 cob IV j j I I ('�,G \ \� G 9 1 e >>.� c/ / SQ / /. ` '• COORDINATE WI4"GAS COMr NY °�,�o / SOG SOG I S N / \� 10+00 ,� , /9 c / / `140 +- - - - 9 \ FOR S� T & U l L T� , ,� 61 N STALL EROSION - +oo i S X CONTROL CAT. 20 �f I 1�8 "\ p F� o� , 11pg / / y`,/s �'o INST-ALLA110N MUST HAVE 4 0 146 / o �/ �'`� , G 914.3 I N G 9 \ / '�Lp`% SF ,Pvl s+75 \� , \ .y. / / \ / / s x �° !° �° ALONG SLOPES G 914.3 ,�19 WEo - g09 EL. 910.35 \ c, / S / / FEES\OF COVE FOR -,STREET / / O /' i o° /� o6og\moo ,29 `` 50• V.C.1o.s / O CROS��NG AND 2-FEET OF ° L -, J �- L- - - ' - 1'�• - -- °1 • ,SEPARATION FOR ANY PIPE PVI �%+50 12.9 12.5 6 . �� , ; oo 9 / �\ �° • • \ CROSSI N �°' / or ,5/i O • • \ \ \ 00 \v oo \ \ ®= \ / ` � / 145� / I \2+00/' Q V 1fL I }I 9�32 �S ` \ ':. \ \ / � // // \ • • • i • • • • \ / / o // 2.p 9 O -� 13i00 - -_ _ .\1•� 16 N I / \ O / /^•, / �� / 91 607 a60% 12.3 �� r / �. / \ e �_\ \ - g1 \� \ OCj I I �� ,�N \ A2 / `\ / O • • 4 906.10 • o a: / G / 914 \ ,3 w G S OG, / // �,� \ \ / 143 144 •, e 6• PIPE o°� ^xhtio / 9,� / > w 1 / / 9 12.5 12.2 _ cr \ \ 913'S \ \ \ i // % \ \ \ S / _ I I \ �, \ 119 • \ Qs °b§,J'/ -I w -� G \ \ SOG \ \ I / o / ,��, '�, x -� / OG> / I I ` \ \ \ � , • E 0 °. w G 1\.� Soo G 914.4 \ SO \ -'' / it V / G s1 . N SOG v v v 125 0 122�`, ' s > >� ��\ / I /�� 8. PIPE ,. • 113 / / p / I I G I 7\ \CIA _ /G I I I I `"� __ \ \ �/-' / / \ 0 a , ' • , • o • �-•' _\ \ �i / \�� 0R \ `/\ 1 '1 `/' / �i /�.�"��'l� /X,09� :' \2s �O�F </'`'� sC j � 91I -- - �k�'�j� � '•' • �, \ • • \ 0e7- '6/ 19110 2 / / -11 / 9' \0\9SOG 20 / 8 PIPE ' \ \ , _- J _ A 12.3 .I f0 -----c % 0\ °8� 27 , 90410 `1_L i / 06 \ • I \ /Q o ° o•w \ YE LMI) BUFFER 12.0O +00 SIG(`sue' ��.13 4 NT lagi 2 • 910�� . • • LOW AREA' i • • • \ 1 20 / / / 12.6 _ \ 1�' �O , \ 1'> • t' • 6 f ' 908 _ • \\ \ o / / _ _ 12.3 1 9' , \ li i i i • ' ' • • • 906 • •�' ' CRITICAL HWL = 906.2 .\� \ // / / '43 � r - - NG �� , I • I ... 'WETLA 25-B ' • • I �SNOWMELT / '• \ 90 /� G -� g13 , G o�'. \ 9. ITICAL H I = 905. \ I l ) TLAN �_Ij\ \ \, S 914.3 914.o W G \ / (SN OWM EL\ s , SOG I I SOG I I S \ ,-'��� •' �:.��° �`�' '907.5 � / / 9 �. ... .. 19 Jtq N • • '. i \ I Q 9 • I •, 05.7 100 ,•••• % I o \a. �? o °o Wi i \i i I W \ \ JJ IWO- Cq WETLAND FILL � ... :%'.�: .:/ r':::.,.:::::�:�:�:::::::':":::::::jr•:j:\\ ` y \ / WETLAND 25-A ..i.. ' - ` ! :::''''':':':':::'::'.►� CRITICAL HWL = 905.5 " : '�':i::i:':a:':'{':'{':'{':':':07 a:':':':.a�.l 1,',•, , / 1 EOF a, (SNOWMELT) .i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i., 1�. 0 25 50 100 \ -902\ \ \ 1 0 x_x_ f \ WETLA D`58- - ) \ l f / �o �o - (IN FEET) \ CRITICAL H = 904.7 j ' SNOWMELT lm / BENCHMARK \ �f 90 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 - Elevation 894.88 ft. NAVD88 ' I 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 \ i - Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) \ ♦ l I \ I L-J \ o 0 0 SUITiIPFIEASANTI�II NE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC 12 CARLSON SUITE 10S0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Drawn: KRO 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments ENGINEERING ILAINE,MNW449 or report was prepared by me or under my � NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY GRADING SURVEYING direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: BJK TEL7f3.-08�7i p y 2 ,. � g 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 0 ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX W. Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1 CARLSON the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-037grade.dwg ­ 4 , 7t J`71 G-1 ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + ♦ + • • ♦ • ♦ • ♦ • I + , ♦ , , ♦ , , , , ♦ • ♦ ♦ + , ♦ •ram♦ I I i.♦♦ I ♦ + + + + + , , + ♦ + + / ♦ • • + + + + ♦ ♦ + ♦ + Oa ' • , , , , , t , , ,fit , , , , u u9 -- u8 �VMC WETLAND BUFFS. • °S ,� . +♦ ♦• ..�.�, ug 9 \ 28,875 S.F. PRP. r/ •• 0>>`�°�� k11.8 10.2T1.5♦• •• •'• �•i'•'i'•k \ \ .(27,270 S.F. REQ.) ,i,i, k 1.0-� \ • 11.3 09.2 - 10 - 09.5 �, -- ---- 10.5 e I 14 \ WETLAND 65 \ CRITICAL \ o j(SNOWMELT) \ \ '.•,. 6'• I I I / .,iiiiiii,................................ s\ O o O I �x S G �i SOG ''`•�. 'a' :, , , ,,\ �\ ; , - ' M \ N \N •0 G - 914.G 11.1 Pw 9_ 14_'0 GI 1I1.39- 14.-0 x O � i12.2 11.8 11.5 0O G.B. 0+5E910.75155 0 EL. 911.65 , G/ / / 1 , C WETLAND BUFFER L : ;r , , 12. 1.20� - - ' °° - -- - i _ +�00 \ , \ \ c� I I o. I - -o3 ,336 S.F. PRP. 5 S.F. REQ.) WETLAND 30 0 (24, �is I 39 RITICAL HWL = 906.0 5 �/'� +N; s12 4r e. 3�° \ • I V1 �� - - N-------- X is \ \\ (SNOWMELT) .• rn N�'� - - --- ,1., 9''3s r, \ 10 FOOT MIN. 1- IoDCITY BUFFER NON WMC :.\ 12,118 S.F.PRP. .0 ! - ' 174 NCV N� �(5,741 S.F. REQ.) �t I '� ,7 •-• �'� \ Ii -� L - / � � / . • � 9 COORDINATE WITH GAS COMPANY i � i ,i.i,i.°,i.° • • `',� � �� � � / _ _ _ - - o� -� / • • • \ • • T� of FOR STREET &UTILITY __ /r' L cn BERM? INc FALL TION -• MUST HAVE 4 I ;ii iii ii, . • / ^� C� / r= - ---_ Lv 1 \ 9 FEET OF COVER FOR STREET \ •; / 52' 0 / / U) 4 Ld - °9 • . \ CROSSING AND 2-FEET OF ; . �, / , ���; "' / / rn 175 // / / \\ • . • \SEPARATION F"OR ANY PIPE �oF ��L _ /� �� _ 1 ,4 _� rn o, \O rn I m l I •• , - - --- .,__� Via/ --___ _ o , 1 J �f, \\ 8 s • • / \ 10-FOOT MIN. • • I - - - _ N p i `� o� - - _ - .'S� \ TOP BERM o I 90 \ 9°s • • \ 9 \ \ CITY BUFFER NON-WMC _.i, •; \/- .......... . . . . . ..... I \ ° \\ • . \ \ 9,777 S.F. PRP. ;�,� ==i= I / ^� / o� \1 �\6 \ / I ,Vii iiiiiii•i':°:RIP-RAP AT •• o I I \\ 90� \\ �o°� \ \ (5,570 S.F. REQ.) I o L �_ co/°' I \ % , • OUTLETS �TYP. L Lot , I \ \ \ �'' I _-� "I '� / `n 'Ito 17 WETLAND 35 '=='::33-_--- ' �•;':II I I , _ `/�0 , �CRITICAL HWL = 906.1 I�,,, o 'mWMC WETLAND BUFFS _ I I + ., POND 50(SNOWMELT) 1n 32,222 S.F. PRP. 12.9NWL = 905 0 �(32188 S.F. REQ.) ICRITICAL HWL = 906.\ \ � v \ �o °N 00 T WETLAND 55 90� �;; I (SNOWMELT) \\ R \\ `9\ \ �', . • 05.3 _ _ _ 12.0 _ N \\ ' o� \ / ,4. �s CRITICAL ICAL HWL = 904, ��, I ! _ --- `. •' •: o -- `� �� p `� v �- -895- - 0� 4.1 �! I RIP RAP AT - v A �� • •� ;.�. , • I i 0 �, II ��- (100 YR) �° OUTLETS (TYP.) v BERM F \ / , . , O ��7 9 / v °�° 1149i 0 • ---� o • V 09 ��• I --12� j90(9 �I • ofl 908 \ PERM TOPF °' 09.0_ - - - - - 09.0 - - • WE AND FILL \ c9 \� I `�\ `'' , V / / / 6,13 , • � o g5, I I 1136 • \ `9 \ !��\ / �1 169 • B -� 00 25 50 100 0 35 137 .p,a __ \ 09.5- �0•�•� 148 (IN FEET)��� ,fit- • •'• • • i 5 1 4,_-'� 7 • • \ V \ \ O ARK 11:0 1X o��\ ` I I , l 80 • •\`9°. 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 =BENCHMSOG , �38� . \ \ \ G d - Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 11' \ \ / N cv x / / \ • • s O �� 9 �• r 0.0 10.2 SO o v / �` / S /� / �90' 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 \ \ I� I �) 913.0 ` / / / • • \ \ \ 09 Olj / l Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) 13 O p 131 13 2 \ \ \ 913.0 , , 9, \ \ / P' 147 ` \� v v �N v� / G / 0 SSG \ '�� L 10.9 / \ \ \ \ \ W11, �� o I I I \ \ \ 11.0 112 l' 9�'a / , / • 0 \ 4.9 \ / / / A0 / /� \ I I �� \ \> 91 r 1� �' � \ „� / 610, // /��\ , • 09 � \ / / � O^ Dc� � \ �°%j �\1s 912 , Jl l i 91S•(l /O SO \ 4 �// COORDINATE WITF�GAS COMPANY •� _ / / G / / SOG SOG N G / ,°+°° _ - , /9 / xi 40STREETo 12� INSTALL EROSION I I \ 11. � - 91'00 /' �� / / >> s X 76 \ 10 5 0. o% p \ FOR &UTILITY \ �\ • 9� % - - r, 8 F I o INSTALLATION MUS HAVE 4 p / o o �\ / \ _ o. �' T 146 1 CONTROL CAT. 20 w 91 \ � NO F - 8 � \ o �` / s G 914.3 G 914.3 I N G -� 9 �-P/9 S ,wl 9+75 / i \ FEET\OF COVER FO TREET / / O ALONG SLOPES _ _ - 11• V 90 EL. 910.35 SEE SHEET 12 / S , , AK N/ / �� / / �'oo sog\; 00 2s p R EN%sINEEi�MCs CARLSON PHEASANT RIMIGE DR NE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO .4/2 /2 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY GRADING 13 SURVEYING �AIN� MN TEL7�3.4�7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: �_ /L -� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX � Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 15 CAMISQN-ENSINEEMINEM114 the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04/25/25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_grade.dwg A 4 . ^ . 7t J) t1G-V SINGLE FAMILY HOLDOWNS 60 LOTS *30' FRONT SETBACK FOR LOTS 101-113 & 181-192 SLAB ON GRADE R/W NO SCALE *25' 60' 1 (FRONT SETBACK) FINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE SOG I In 0.2' TOPSOIL 10, In 1 0 10' �r 1.0' 1 WALKOUT R/W NO SCALE *25' 60' (FRONT SETBACK) 25' wo 10, I I ----------- -- - ---- in x I I 2.5' 0.5' TOPSOIL t 1 0.5' MIN. TOPSOIL t FINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE 1 I 0 I n 10' i i 1 0.5' MIN. 1 �T0PS01L 1 MODIFIED WALKOUT R/W *25' 60' (FRONT SETBACK) 25' I I IWO 2) 0 10' I --- 0.5' TOPSOIL LOOKOUT R/W NO SCALE *25' 60' 1(FRONT SETBACK) 25' I I LO 1 � 10, I i I I I 2.5' 0.5' TOPSOIL t FINISHED GRADE I GRADING GRADE 1 I 0 I �n 10' i i TOPSOIL 1 �1 -FINISHED GRADE -GRADING GRADE in 1 o 0 Lon r0.5' MIN. i TOPSOIL MODIFIED LOOKOUT R/W NO SCALE *25' 60' 1(FRONT SETBACK) 25' I 0.5' TOPSOIL _ 2' -hl _-II-III- ll \ 7 ? I SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL II l =i i i ITi COMPACTED BACKFILL NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL J SUBGRADE CORRECTION (60' LOTS) - *60 on *UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN 0.5' TOPSOIL ARIES GRADING GRADE 3.0' 10' PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE SELECT BACKFILL _ MATERIAL �<opF q MAXI'Q MAX. 10.0 I I MIN. BOTTOM OF UNSTABLE MATERIAL GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 59.4 - 60.5 I LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL -1I I-1I Ii it I I� I I I-1I I-1I I - DRAINAGE & UTILITY 2U] GRADING LOT NUMBER EASEMENT SURFACE DRAINAGE LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION ADDITIONAL CORRECTION AREA HOUSE TYPES R RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO -RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT © BUILDING 96r2) ENTRY WALKOUT WO RAMBLER WALKOUT 0 SE SPLIT ENTRY RECOMMENDED SEWO-SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT GARAGE SIDE G 68.0 CG CUSTOM GRADING SOGDENOTES SLAB ON GRADE FINISHED ELEVATION © LOT CORNER � � - - - - - - J FA ^ DENOTES STEP CONDITION (IN 6" STEPS) ISTREET I I TREE FENCE ANCHC T-POS 2"X2" NOTES: TYPICAL LAKE SECTION POND 300 4 4 �1 1� N . W. L. 10:1 ---- 10'1 3 3 1 Q 1 20' BOTTOM 20 VARIES TYPICAL POND SECTION POND 500, 600 1 1 -111I N.W.LE 3 n 3 1 LLJ Q 1 10' 10' BOTTOM VARIES BARRIER FENCING REED SOIL 1. TREE FENCING SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT PER CALIPER INCH OF TREE DIAMETER FROM TREE(S) THAT IS/ARE TO BE SAVED. 2. ANCHOR POST MAY BE SPACED UP TO 10 FEET APART. 3. SECURELY ATTACH TREE FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF TWO ATTACHMENTS PER POST. 4. SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2572. w z J 0 J LOT BENCHING DETAIL w w w z z z J J J 0 0 0 J J J LOT PROFILE _ DIRECTION OF FLOW (LOT) STREET PROFILE - �_ DIRECTION OF FLOW (STREET) 0.5'- 0.5' 0.5' SILT FENCE 0 0 ANCHOR W/ METAL T-POST OR WOOD 0 2"X2" STAKE 0 0 DIRECTION OF FLOW ° �:-- ° z ��-III-III N ° III' it III - NOTES: TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 25-141 AT 60 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPLIED AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 1 10-10-10 AT 200 POUNDS PER ACRE. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FILTER FABRIC (36" MAX. HEIGHT) OPENING IN FABRIC WEAVE < 212 pm 6"X6" TRENCH (COMPACTED BACKFILL) UNDISTURBED SOIL 1. DIG A 6"X6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED SILT FENCE LINE. 2. DRIVE ALL ANCHOR POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. 3. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART. 4. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE ANCHOR POSTS AND BACK FILL 6"X6" TRENCH. 5. SECURELY ATTACH SILT FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF THREE ATTACHMENTS PER POST. 6. SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 & 3886. 0 .EAR (MIN.) 1 6" MIN. T CARLSONSURVEYING�ITE1°Q #PHEASANT IRNE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed CommentsENfiINEE�IN>s M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH 14 CNN ISLAINF. MN TEL7�3.48�7 direct supervision and that I am a duly p y Signature: �- 2 -� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 DETAILS of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX 76' 4W79M Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota / 15 GAIN-ENI�NEERIN1ftiM the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 554161 1 Save Date: 04/25/25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_detaiIs. dwg , � A 4 . ^ . 7t J`t1G-V OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE POND 600 LAKE 300 901.5 898.0 TYPICAL STREET SECTION STREET B 60' R/W — 24' B/B R/W 30' 18' 12' h� 6' 4.0% 82.0% 2.5% MIN SOD W/4" OF TOPSOIL N SEED & MULCH REMAINING R/W 1 �; 6' SIDEWALK - 4" CONCRETE (3A32) 4" FINE FILTERED AGGREGATE OR CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR RECYCLED EQUAL (MNDOT 3138) (SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION) R/W 1 ' r5' 0.04 5' SIDEWALK 4" CONCRETE (3A32) 4" FINE FILTERED AGGREGATE OR CLASS 5 RECYCLED AGGREGATE BASE OR EQUAL (MNDOT 3138) (SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION) MODIFIED S CONCRETE CURB GUTTER T/C = q-.06 R/W \-- 20" CONCRETE RIBBON CURB 6" TOPSOIL & SOD OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE POND 500 WETLAND R/W 30' 12' 18' 2' 4.0% *PAVEMENT SECTION —SEE GEN-1 DETAIL TYPICAL STREET SECTION 60 R/W — 32 B/B (STREET D) 16' 16' 2.0% MIN - 20" CONCRETE RIBBON CURB B /C = - .40 14' 0.04' /FT PROPERTY LINE L SOD W/4" OF TOPSOIL 4' BEHIND CURB SEED & MULCH REMAINING R/W *PAVEMENT SECTION PROVIDE MASTIC ALONG CURB LINE BEFORE SEE GEN-1 DETAIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED TYPICAL STREET SECTION 14' 0.04'/F SOD W/4" OF TOPSOIL 4' BEHIND CURB SEED & MULCH REMAINING R/W MODIFIED S CONCRETE CURB GUTTER T/C = (�-.06 TYPICAL STREET SECTION 60 R/W — 32 B/B (STREET A 8c C) z n' 16' 16' 2.0% MIN *PAVEMENT SECTION —SEE GEN-1 DETAIL R/W - 85' 1' 0.04'/FT — 1— 5' SIDEWALK 4" CONCRETE (3A32) SOD W/4" 4" FINE FILTERED AGGREGATE OF TOPSOIL OR CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR RECYCLED EQUAL (MNDOT 3138) PROVIDE MASTIC ALONG CURB LINE BEFORE WEAR COURSE IS PAVED 898.0 9 .0 " ORIFICE INFRASAFE - 2'x3' DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 2'x3' HDPE FRAME INSERT) SEED & MULCH REMAINING R I RAW INSERT BASKETS N W/OUT FILTER BAGS MICRON FILTER BAGS RED INSIDE BASKETS EMERGENCY-/ \O OVERFLOW PORTS - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.E "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R-3067 OR R-3290 SERIES 16' ' I 16' • I 6" TYP y JOINT ADHESIVE (MASTIC) J SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL INSET A • ROAD WIDTH DIMENSION M 1.5" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C) SPEC 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 3" SPEC 2360 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 4" 69 9C4 GRAD a AR 69RROW 24' APPROVED SUBGRADE •• 2.0= SEE GEN 4 STD PLATE TO BACK OF CURB R/W VARIES MAx. SLOPE 3:1 MIN. SLOPE 4" TOPSOIL dr SOD 1.5" C 2360 TYPE SP 9.5 NG COURSE (SPWEA240C) C 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 3" S C 2360 TYPE SP 12.5 NON W ING COURSE (SPNWB230C) 8" AGGREG BASE, CL 5 *SELECT GRANULAR NOT \ NEEDED. ONSITE SANDS ARE •• THIS WORK SHALL INCLUDE OVER TURNING THE ACCEPTABLE. SOIL IN WET CONDITIONS TO DRY SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND PASSING ROLL TEST (INCIDENTAL). TYPICAL SECTION 1A I��IAw, 2o2n It (URBAN STREET) 17 Y' � O F GEN-1 LNOL_KEr INFRASAFE - 27" DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES W///),rHDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN W/OUT FILTER BAGS 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERTS `l� � `EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.E "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R-3250-A OR R-3250-1 (MNDOT 801) FRAME CASTING SPECIFICATIONS: MONUMENT CONSISTS OF A POST AND A PROTECTED OPEN SPACE SIGN aheratlous such as dumping filling, plowing, I MOUNTED FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF THE POST FASTENED WITH mowing nad yard taaslc dispo..nl are prohibilcd. I NON -REMOVABLE SCREWS OR RIVETS SIZE: 5.5" H x 3.75" W ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY. GAUGE '� SHALL BE 0.080 4JLc 4f LND 0KKES I SIGN COLOR III" COLOR SHALL BE GREEN AND BLUE LETTERS ON u y,w hm c yueamic nn the ryrnecdon ut hi+mi nml al�x:nu w.i�rna n varm, plcyw: amuclfiO IIalf A WHITE BACKGROUND. of Ipsl f va:-:•un POST MATERIALS 4" X 4" SQUARE TREATED WOOD OR OTHER CITY APPROVED MATERIAL POST INSTALLATION MOUNTED TO A HEIGHT OF FOUR FEET ABOVE GRADE SET AT LEAST 42 INCHES IN THE GROUND INSTALLED AT EACH LOT LINE WHERE IT CROSSES A WETLAND BUFFER WITH A MAXIMUM 4 X 4 TFEATED POST I SPACING OF 300 FEET BETWEEN SIGNS ( IF NO BUFFER IS REQUIRED THE MONUMENT SHALL BE AT THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND). PLACE ADDITIONAL POSTS AS NECESSARY TO FOLLOW BUFFER CONTOUR LINE JDIGITAL COPY OF SIGN AVAILABLE FROM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY' +t lUF LNOL KES CARLSONSURVEYING�ITE1°Q 3I�QPHEASANT RME DR NE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO 1.4Revisions: /2M/I 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed CommentsEN>sINEERIN>� HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH 15 CNN SLAINEs MN TEL7�3.48�7 direct supervision and that I am a duly p y Signature: �- 2 -� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 DETAILS of PLANNING ENGINEERING FAx7 Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes Minnesota 15 I GAIN-ENI�NEERINII�t M the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04/25/25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_details.dwg A 4 tt J) t1G—V. LEGEND SITE BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SECTION LINE - - - - 1/4 SECTION LINE -------- 1/16 SECTION LINE -------- - - - 2' CONTOUR---------- 10' CONTOUR —---— WETLAND------------- WATER—•—•—•—•—•— TREE LINE FENCE LINE --------- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ——� ——� — — UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE — — — — MANHOLEMH O HYDRANT "YD '0 GATE VALVE cv FLARED END SECTION 0 POWER POLE 10, TB TELEPHONE BOX ❑ TELEVISION BOX TV Fol MAIL BOX MB o SIGN SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 59.3 AC. EXISTING ZONING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1) NOTES 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY. SOIL TYPES w Isanti fine sandy loam Ma Markey muck, Ocassionally ponded SoA Solderville fine sand ZmB Zimmerman fine sand - I • •• 100 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 — Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 — Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) —i----/T-------- - - / SoA ' / IW I I SoA Ma WETLAND IW \ ---- °�`- WETLAND10 ------------ / \A`-\--�---� i \ \\\ Imo!/A 1 \ / I I \ \ ♦♦♦ \ ' \\ i I w -----� , 1 W \, I, AW WETLAND \\\ /I ,// - - - - - - - ! - - ' // \\ o\ ` \I ♦♦♦ ZmB ♦♦♦♦t I \\9 I \ / \ ♦♦ \ ♦♦ III / I II � — ♦ I ♦♦v�����1����r���� I I I II \ ♦♦ o, \\.\\ // \�\ I WETLAND // ♦i ��� SOA i�11 11 I � --� ♦f♦ ��� I III �� \ •♦♦♦ - ' /�/ ♦vu��i i���M�,� ,� l\ /' \ �,�- \ \ I SOA ♦♦ �� I I POND \ ♦ / �� ♦ /� \�i� \ \ / �'" / I ♦ ♦ - ICI \ ♦♦ � / -���♦♦♦♦ -9907.0 —1 ,� / I �♦i �� - III �I ♦♦♦♦ sets%$*�♦♦♦ /// \ \ \\ \\���•• / ���� sos_ IWft \^� \ \ \ \ r / ♦♦♦♦♦�I��I,.L., ` _ - I I i II / / ---------------- - - - \ "\ V � I♦ - - I I ------------ AND \, ,�/ - I~ I,, _ I'♦♦♦ z ZmB -------- WETLAND '� ♦ \ \, \ - % ♦ ♦ 1 \ II / ---t-- �I \` — 'L — \, `\ ( 909.E ♦ I \ -_ ) I I / I / , ` �WETLAN U : \\ SB 6 \ \ ,;♦♦♦♦ / WE j1 j j I , - \`\ `�� �-- �► ♦ i/ % I ; �/ /WETLANDiiA IW°\`\` i♦ I \� �/J �— --_- I ------- °�--------- WETLAND ��♦��♦ .��.1. \\�\\\ ♦♦♦ DRAINAGE \ /�VG 0 / --� ��♦♦ �����. \\ �\ ♦♦♦ BREAK SOA-------------------� '�� �\ ,9$_ ♦Xv- ♦ ••#, \ ♦♦♦ ��y \ •♦ ♦♦♦\\\ �S�.PI�E������������������������... , x ` ♦♦ L��. ♦♦♦ �- ♦♦ ♦♦♦ �� \� \'� 00s \ \ 1�1��. I' WETLAND ♦i' ♦♦♦♦♦ ' I' �. �� ♦♦♦♦9® oar \ \ ♦i♦i _ \ i \ 3 \ ♦♦ ♦♦ \ '► SOIL DELINEATION °,�9a45 ♦♦ �I ♦ \ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ -71008 WETLAND LINE (TYP) TO\P 8\PIPE - -- ♦♦ �. ,/ .... I ..•• \ s0 WE 0 SOIL TYPE / \� \\`\ ' /' \ - - ♦♦♦♦� _ — / (TYP) \ \ . , _ , - ♦ , 907.5 / f �'\ I - ■111111■ ♦ — , OU TOOT D \ \ IW s7 I WETLAND \ 10 \, \\\ WA 907.0 1 I WETLAND 10 44 'SOA I\�,\� ���!l��..j\\\ /I WETLAND 1 \ WETLAN�,11 \ • 1, ► / — —•, \ / \ _ \ _ - ---- v \ : I ►� 12 i OA IW ANDAL W=TREE A i SoA ENGINEERING CARLSON 3tPHEASANT NIEDRNE SUITE 1ES# I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH R1 SU VEYIN CNN BLAINE. MN TEL7�3.4+'�7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: ���__ //� /� ,-� Designed: BJK g 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 RESOURCE INVENTORY of ENGINEERING PLANNING' FAX �. � Licensed Professional Engineer under 3/4/25 25063 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2 CU&SON-ENGINEEMNSMM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: License #: Date: St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 03 03 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03-resource inventory exhibit.dwg A 4 7t J) t1G-V- ' I ' II I I I II I, I 1, ��' LEGEND I SoA �, j Ma SITE BOUNDARY LINE SoA EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SECTION LINE WETLAND 1 4 SECTION LINE ( � 1/16 SECTION LINE ------ \ ` \ 2' CONTOUR - - - - - - - - - - W 10' CONTOUR ----- - WETLAND WATER — • - • - • - • - —----------------- -0- I\ II \ \ TREE LINE FENCE LINE - -•-•- -•- - ---- \ `� ` __-_ OVERHEAD ELECTRIC-�.-�.-�.-�.-.^•-------==-9 s-� � �`� � � WETLAND UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE — MANHOLE O \�• �11-------------------------- MH HYDRANT "�YD - \ �`\ \�\\� y`\ '�---�, �\ SoA I \ \ \\' •�♦. •C \\ \ \ - \ GATE VALVE D4 ` \ I W `�-----I ` ' W \♦. AW� \ FLARED END SECTION 0 POWER POLE /11WTB, �\ '�\� ti `\ � � �'� \ Mt TELEPHONE BOX ❑ WETLAND\` \�\ __ - - - - - �� ♦♦♦ m '��4�`� I \ \ \ TELEVISION BOX �� \� \'� •1' �• I MB MAIL BOX o ``�.\ ,/' ` '\9� I Ir 1 - ••�� \I '�r���N������N���*'' SIGN / `\ �� �`�• C� A b SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 59.3 AC. EXISTING ZONING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1) NOTES 1. SOIL DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE WEB SOIL SURVEY. SOIL TYPES Iw Isanti fine sandy loam Ma Markey muck, Ocassionally ponded SoA Solderville fine sand ZmB Zimmerman fine sand - I • •• 100 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 — Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 — Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) / / / / / SoA jib\ I=W / / OU TLOT B I - IW I W •• j TLAfD _------------ WETLAND ♦♦ \\ __--- ----- ���•�� �1�� vvv �♦♦♦ v`vv DRAINAGE ����� \ / ��� �I �. `\ �. ♦ BREAK � - ---- SoA \ 90 �� ��, \ ♦ WETLAND - SoA 2 ♦♦1♦������i �, v v �, ♦♦j ��•�� 1®P� 'PIPE vvv j v ♦♦♦1 - � -�L 3 �� ♦♦ ��� '► SOIL DELINEATION 07 x9a4�45 `\ ♦♦ c� ♦♦ ��• WETLAND LINE (TYP) �O� oas \\`' ♦i� ' \ —_,� ������ ����4 \ ►J O4 y ♦ ` ` \ PAP RIPE \ \` �.\ '• Al ♦ `� : SOIL TYPE- '� : (TYP) 1�♦907.5 ♦♦ vvi AV' 7 i `v 7 �� \ ' / S♦fit �' '=\i \\\ �i •• ••111111111111f►�'' OU TLOT D , ♦ IW 9CM7 WETLAND*A SBW 907.0 so1# 41t `v � l SoA ZmB IW i �. ;) WETLAND I, O \\\` \ ���..I \\ /�� WETLAND • ' 4i3 LI m B WETLAND \\10 � ' l I / - -`-` - - \\\ \\\ 1., 0/'V / \ (D Oil All, an '. . , OA NDALw=TREE / 4 , ENGINEERING CARLSON �9E#PHEASANT iIEI3NE SUITE I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO Revisions: 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH RESOURCE INVENTORY R2 SURVEYING kNNN IE, MN 7s44 iBLAMNE TEL7W.485.79W direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: `� //� , ^� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 of ENGINEERING �`NNIN€' Fax 7W. Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: License #: 25063 Lino Lakes, Minnesota WITH AERIAL IMAGERY 2 I CAM-SON-ENGNEEFIN�1t=M the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/4/25 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 03 03 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_resource inventory exhibit.dwg — 4 ,, „.-, 7t J`71 G—%J_ VICINITY MAP I D V o �P 0 0 MAIN STREET (CSAH 14) 0 z a O� w w a z = v z � 5 LILAC ST. N APOLLO DR. NOT TO SCALE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE — — BITUMINOUS CONCRETE [,: , ' — - SANITARY SEWER > STORM SEWER >� WATER MAIN OVERHEAD UTILITY UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE MANHOLE O HYDRANT HYD MH I�C? GATE VALVE Gv X T TELEVISION BOX ❑ TB TELEPHONE BOX ::1 UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — 2' CONTOUR — FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE SPOT ELEVATION LL:J x---- EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS TREELINE SOIL BORING SHEET INDEX T1. TREE PRESERVATION INDEX T2—T4. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T5. TREE MITIGATION NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTinCA110N AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMA110N. the guidelines of GI/AS;UL 68—U2, entitled --Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." DENOTES INLET PROTECTION O 00.0 -a x E.O.F. �0343 x E>E�> 000.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- ,AAAAA+ 0 50 100 200 (IN FEET) 11 BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set in the ground in a covered tube located 150 feet westerly of the centerline of Rondeau Road West and 40 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S.A.H. No. 14. Elevation=894.88 (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.01 (NAVD 88) EN%sINEERMc; CARLSON PHEASANT MIDGE IR NE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: 330 Revisions: �. M / I HOMES NATURES REFUGE NORTH T 1 SURVEYING CNNN BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL7f3.48�7�I3 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive TREE PRESERVATION INDEX of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX fM Licensed Landscape Architect under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota T5 LSON-ENGINEERING01=M the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_pIan - new tree rules.dwg Tr J`71 G—VJ \ ° 1 0^ /Z' ? JBeR 39 , M�o (0 o III'' / /♦ so,�°°9'`k0��j�°/0j�^�S°/j m'✓ 8E5 d�c �° o� �/ry /N „/m"' �hry / 23233ti9AA1° y •r ' . ti'Ye / v y \at�ot d?A \^�s^�CC' \ yk�'S$" x a � IR I101 ti� 0221 494 / ?�(D 401 ° > e 911.50 O�p ° s 1 ' I (909.0) I -------- 039 y� o // _ 21 0 - s • • 248 x `� / ry / `�° <o N ' I I I _ • • • / u �( \ i `.��' G I I co I I I • .�° N \/ / 9160 . 0 I / ` / • M w ^/ R O O O p?� • / 3j1 N / x �— \ 1) m� k< I I I j O �� / ? •• ' 9 ` N x / `° co o° t6 6x / M % I I G 915.5 / / a0 3g5, Sp O'.j 0 c / �h pg23 1 2474x 1�69 1 2 ♦ M L / / -7 \ \ • >t� 0 3947 945 ° 23 M 1g 4+ 7 \ \ 3g � 6 / ti 2 '?040 • � e'v. \ xz3g@x � 16 o / 2 01 SIV > \ \ • / - 01g4g♦ O / � o 02301 0 \ 23 ' �t�y > �o I /\ ° \ �i,° /� •r 1 o • I I / • 0' p 154 �p 1� • ���/ � / k \ \ 2 \ � � � � ^ / ��ro \ �/ • I ' / M 0 2C \ I / c 102 • ` 91 /i • 1 ° p 1567Lo62 01561 O, � \ \ ,8 — 0 9�6 / I . I � 6�\ 41 G L 6 5 ^ t/m \ ` \ \ \ \ \ / / � /\\ \ \ \ v /\ \ / \ �, 9°� �O•S� / G 09816.5.0 I I I II (907.8 I I 06 ) I I I gLo066� \ \\ \ \ �0� N/ / / \ ••• / ° � 8 p15 908.3) o• NNe153s 1s3o 2A3 O'906 "0*'q° N' O°�0''? 0 ltN 74oR II I I I y10 `w -710 s• _AD 0I . Jdev4ry 1N �'wN // 16 x♦ > \ \ � o 6 IV 0151"S1 °o'0 1619 01780 2° �o670 ®^o •01516o1� r.0 II I I —--� / •- • I / 1712 " 17@g o0 1IQ ^ 1 �k 6 _ 6j / �o-�.rS ^ I / / / • I 1 / 01748 1763 yo > y o O� — h°' / / � �+� '°�� a / 0 6 — �• �.° 01 09L 1762 1777 1 e10 77 'g8 N' ti / I • \ /0 0 _ p 175P o �00 B M ° Cow — > `0 0 h"� h�, — d•°` 17 ,1,0 0 p1776 ®>' ^�'� I - I ,jm�( g� 1BO rsm� O`L 01�(�° y9 q 868 • /0 y , F QD o _ 01 po81 ® g2® o ,q� 0 0 9� 986 9p °O x x M x @ 1598\ / �cO • 0 0985 0 90� cb >� 2 ? �t L8 • N ry� 8 0� O 900 O 8 \ p 980 �T� y }S, p v / � \ / �o O 198 x9 5 0979 �i o k 0 0 988�j.`9 g poi 6' 7 18 0 0996 099 0 -', x 96 9 77 0 ,T?°' x959 7 9 g 0 910�0 @O o \ geB0 ` x9 0\Comb) a 10 970 oo ` W%1 � 9 091� cc'��p O9� \ x30 4 \ (" Jeff 0h x }(51 d 0 2@ � r' 7 1 I N OWE �'ry � fie( m 6 I I I 02001 ° > x5 e� CD 9O 90 Ox a'1 g x5764-y-A JeE O 0 03 01' I n6d �1 I I g 1x x 6 a 000 o 04°'1 ` A8 11 a 610 461 V F? @ . � 81� 1 � g5 � '3j g01 J Ar 248 / \ 0 0904 'be • 685x 6 s2 m \ _ ro • • • • N 906— --_— <I cv •!•�.i. w i i .•ri. !•• •�.�. .•.'. .'.'` — — — . Q4- �. ._�.�T•�T.�; .'_'.�•_•. l •672 • b+ • -v-r I @ y �so� tee• — -_. / / I I I �' b I I S +• \ @810 0 +96 0� -900— _ LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UTILITY POLE EASEMENT LINE RETAINING WALL KEY N CURB LINE - - FENCE 10' CONTOUR OUTSIDE INSIDE BITUMINOUS [ _ _ _ _ ] — GAS EASEMENT GAS EASEMENT CONCRETE ]:___•] 2' CONTOUR — - DENOTES TREE 20650 2065 SANITARY SEWER ----> FEMA FLOOD PLAIN TO BE SAVED WETLAND LINE STORM SEWER - - - - ->>- >> 00. 0 DENOTES TREE TO toss > 2065 x WATER MAIN DENOTES INLET SPOT ELEVATION-E3---- x----E3- ax �- - PROTECTION E. 0. F. BE REMOVED TREE LOCATION OVERHEAD UTILITY -one ... EMERGENCY OVERFLOW � � x r> r> TREE TAG # STORM CATCH BASIN ® 1. 000.0 STORM MANHOLE r oSILT FENCE -0 • • • • • - NOTE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O TREE FENCE o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 50 100 MANHOLE O GRADING LIMITS A A A A A A- IDENTIFlCAT10N AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT HYD MH INFORMATION. GV HYDRANT � TREELINE �1� (IN FEET) GATE VALVE T x TELEVISION BOX ElSOIL BORING TELEPHONE BOX Revisions: CARLSONSURVEYINC&ENSINEERINS 3 # PHEASANT MDGE DR NE SUITE100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan 3. Ruttger, RLA or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: 330 1, M / I HOMES NATURES REFUGE NORTHTEL76BLAINF,MN7900 T2 TEL7fif.4:7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: g � Designed: RJR g 5354 Parkdale DriveTREE PRESERVATION PLAN of ENGINEERING RLANNIN�s FAx7�.7sM Licensed Landscape Architect under p Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 c� Lino Lakes Minnesota , T5 1CARL.SON-ENQNEERINrCDM the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan - new tree rules.dwg A 4 , ^ n o 2 N N NN o ^`v �`1• T� O 7233 p n t- O 7227 7228 SRO Q 8673 I °� \ % Og O 4 9S 9? S / p 4357 A41 k38 0 B k �• 1! 9 \ 5312 y S y p� O': O O ry`l� ° ry ` r 8684 3 J6(8666 p(8159 6` �j'� 6' S ' 0 g ° / S 4368 ° 4391 9° 1 \ O p 0 p p O O 238 \ A S O \ R O R s p R�p 1 �6 1 ( ' p ---- �� _ /o e°ss o • ? 4399 0 .> O 4126 o h ,. M" we_ > ler �9 ^`° S � / 5 `� � / 2010 Ac�O o � � Zg$ k rot,r��1op O xj of o, s \ S S of p ° _' m MH d0725j O 225 0906 07232 0723 ;: 3 k q�O �0� °8 2 h 9 / S cP0 04396 ° o y O ?@ O 4810 °� o O o O > •-• �- - - p7231 ^ 0 6 IIeE pi8, S `� 3@ � Oki. 2p ° �9 99 4 R\� x O y `L 37 \ k 9iq �•- • -�♦ Sss8 m �0 0 / om / B� 9 \ \ e �' le( iN $0 • 59 S o° / o °' 4981 0 2) b o 4192° '� yry s ° 53 ° 5318 o p ° @¢ o to• �t • fo o`OK ®h 81 18511 1 1v N k°� @98 A \ O °� i'A / W O O° 0 4209 426g 6k A� k�°' h O r'? `'O a v I WEL is t1� • �o q� • ° / \ ` / P FE rti / R /. `J9 9 M `(�� o ° 0�0 ) p p o o p S S, S- S S S �/ ro / 9 tP .�'SF _ �J IIO k`L O M S S 7 \ ? S o �O865500N \ 9 4i O O O A 4 00 coB o 9 0 1S18i .� < N • O / 0 8 g kg 2° 6 O �6 w o S O °� O o • �O ' �! O 410 4354 x 9 9 18 4 9 4232 0 ° 86560 0 o i o o �i 1 tm o e v 0/ 20 So s kL k'L p0 4j o o@\ p 3 E> o g6Sg o g1866p ° �y'j hh a N ^� '� ♦ D 2oE N O B • 3P 0 v 00 S ^ O S� O 5317 o S \ @ S O 00 h / ti 2 M 0 N 4g o 04271 o k% e� S 2S 01 ,� 98 v� o S ?� $6 i W 0 B B Sj >� = 85 N 9 S o y9 k'� T(� T(" N 9 S 4289 y 1 � 9 O 86 a y", h r \ O 0> ° B �� s O m • 9B O ^o J 4 9 4o P o x O 70 4P ry o 0 \ L e' 1 53 s 9 \ ky 2 4 > S A5 8 i • m o o > 222 k II 6T pT O 4rtwt� y 40 rp > N X 3 O 'j6 y h R w °1 2� J p O ° °de �3A -0-- �4 _y A O j SS V ``„ ° \ , B •s /� o,'b° `L, 0 `1/ 4339 gg3 ® R� 93o o R2� `'S k ° 51 o Sic _ p hw !� o p ° O O f 2 / / S / I�? 8 S Nc� 0 1 O h h t� S u� 2 5224 5 I \ \ 00 O O°`S( 0 .- n N B2BS85� g gTry 699 1x� °'c S gj 6� / /� R `'O R p 4287-gyp— 51 O O '7 5223� g9 p 5136 8@430 B RS `>? oS ^ w K ` 00 • 0° 6 m ' so "� 190 _ 7o O d' 0 427 o O `� '� o �PO 5182 o S ti 9 0 QT B p � O ♦ O 1 JB( O O __ 9 cP �' 10 O O �L O 2 `fit O xao ♦ \ 42 d24 O N ^ 5!!82 / 4325 9 a �' Z 520 O O > 9 9 k3 O kti ^ o ¢ d R� �4.4�E eo o, 9 —� / 6 6 6+ � R 3 � °� 'S O J9 51 ,�°� O 0 ? S d m ro .� ♦ ?x �p 9a a jb, s ^ 1� 7�(6 1 • 5 'o w o SY I ;5 � --I- •"88 O 2 ro 0o h 4769 a M p m 90 ? • 01 iBi \ 1 g$ ��� 4 9S 9� h ti s O� / �n 43N O f8 4 8 Volc4B � i ` p 5173 h� o S h'` e� 5189 ° O c p 203 co $637 ry O a ` 893 / nc+. �so� s�°Je� >2 x�oo m °�b�° Q 59�J° / / 9 / �,�' 0y °p v 04290 ♦ y1�� hwh R o h" S O o ', 00 \ .g m ro o N g ' B 82 0 °�° �r ` 9 00 / 9 c` _ 4805 '1 1 O v 193 0, '� ►� 202 �o 'N-, � • k o cr c) 4291 p 284 O O_ 1 'b 0 5 0 o a1 O a 0 �h �+ •} ) m 1 \ h �je( 3"111E 'O 5 9�� g0, \ / �810 / x R 5 ° may— Oyu O �° h�j�y1 uT t� O O 86 o ee o /0`1' B23 �� s O / 00 / 04315 R9 o `� ?y �9� ?� 1 0 0 s '1 \ b g w, af824? 6 �[ • c� O' �431;4 B b o o ® R 4804 0 �' y o .� k203g 23o 0 9 • W Oti ' $9 "� a"N695 hoc fin' 696 ry ios �, N" I^ O o ' g3 4 gS 1 O 6 h S h O O 5152 NBw s lR '° '1 $°%°OOk2 R0 y.�O c s5153 O p O _O� O �? �! a �o W`V �') 6g�o^/O p ro Kry kry 83 N ry6 S hro iT OS, V p 1 `�5 5 47 p '9l j 0 St O W O ^i 22� �eE`1e( �i`� d O \ O 9, S S91 h 8 497 ry k� $o60986010 o O > $ m �o 06966 > S �� / 4 8� ,y96 ° OO �l`L 0 1�' 5154 S n $ o oe 88 m �,+ N3 3 cv h N6g6° • s 0 ^ / 0� k N k o 0 5 O Ocy o > er �p o �� f O 8925 �8b28 ,y,0 1qq l - `" 1 �, ��o°j ao 3e(46�J70 54 0%068 a �o "O? ^6 S • . ° `9) n m ` p 4943 0'`0o c°Dv by ° �y� ♦ y,�Oy Sl0 o / Rio ° j$ p m ® '. �m� ^� w T, > 604 ?� c� bO O a m p 5 kti o d �'1 ?�8 py ♦ y O ?O o 51 m IJ 00 °° o O @61g 88 9 0 / 31 0 ry�� l i��� 69k O�(@ �06 ,� om °T '° 60 �h k9 o y10k 51Cr 01 05109 9y1- o O 8815 A C n ryry�h � yL o M i' g1 O °60 O / c L°Q' / k'41 a N 2 O p y in 0 p 8832 g1 O • 19 oT S k 0 9 �9 �n g � O o ro R� 96 o O p Gp p 4427 0 0 (bWw, ° c� 0 476 O / k �' O ( �iP OS S B / 49 ti b m / 9 m o i °° 218 223 I/ 1• M •< < cc 9 ?090 O @ O p 4279 ♦ srR o o O 1 J ��6915 ° @psis 0J8 0 o q�` k9 ,q3.� ^ P k 15+� 00 SO Asr o h ao oy 0 4� III ro o �h • Jelyw _ a as 31 ev 9 `� O @ O 2j Ry / x o x 2� ci p 5234 �4�W5 °C ° 0 44g0 ..`ti y 82 / f 0008849 ° • oqT 8 ^� .319 3 23821�o 0 026 60 9 hoh 047s x S�� • • Di • 4942 4202 ° o 5233 04425 sr�? 44go °93 4489 0 05117 4761 I o� O 8824 ® g I N pg896 I pq g 11 • O o & 4447 0 3 I 0 h \ ry $ M312 0 6 rn rn 6 @ k i .�� 4225 1 %` 44O o 13 ♦ 4449 0 513 O 8848 O 0h a p 8823 h ��2�( �e(8 p -0, M 3002 I$ i° 9 �( l @, le(89 \ `v °7 �o' o� 4 / 0� • • g8 O ^ ° N� n 8 4412 O O p 4446 °' ro ^� °S�2 h^No 0 5118 0 51 p 4760 v p 0 B 9 y1 N Hf III h o o m . 9> o, h • `Oo,`v Oh • 4233 h .% ° RRB ° • • N 54 / o k o 0 202 ? 4448 Q � ° n ° N O\� $ s- V - -1 95 ro j�3120 1eE89 / 9JeCo �� 9°4 �O oy m @m o� / �• - ` ` ° rn -4.4 . 10 J— ,p 4423 ^O •i_ .�o L o O • v ry ba s �o o, v a x M h �p 1 n .�F 1 e 9114� • 'P $$39 p1q� @ a — $ M . 1 ^� el, J� 7° p p e ° / • • O d A w ao y - J `o "?^ ' @ ' , ��' 69 . 6 3J� -� • • IN • 49_29 �" eP` p 4405 p ♦ Op S♦ O O : • 5 I w ao 0 hh 4ii o O > • 9 - 6'O @� hh 9 - @ 3 k 0 L493 93 0 422122 0 4@ ° 4682 M ° 44°4 . ♦ 1 .�° 0 W O9 • N 69 OS f 69 0 8855 ° °( °j aOo °' 9 9 ° 8 • J o 'b • • ; �311��' '� 3 1 0 ° 8 p R w 1 0 ry• 4420 4@g o s448 o O o ? 4 2 -i ° O° • S°� w - o m • 9 0 00 901 2? •o,`• ry 21� • • • • • • • • °� • • O • .685 ° o ►f' .a459x pq -1e( ►P O 1 °aa /oy 97�� `L• • • ZI' 0 0 O o�(� 473 08 ^ �6 °�� O •1 S 11� pIg - - 85 lr w �° 9 1 p o • • °` • • • • • • • °O 7 ° \ \ B 0 0 88640 ti 0 I Je(30131157 9 O �11' 60 \ ,O 0 • o / • uT - - 44 1 �j•0 84797 ° p �° p ^ oO t°` 3037 ip O �� l M S _ �t / \ p 888 0888 m ��y ° o M .ate 2�9 19T _ _ NAP( a w I I,i4 - • . o �qs p k10 \ • M t •G ( J1(47s2 p�4 43 p 8891 O \ O AigBB1 30 �- xv° B� e: M 1di' • yy 1 o o \ \ A ow I I 9�, r48�12 \ • • x: O + : p 4�gh O � 9� ; • 4k�� 3 p(47 1 00 BO 0 0 `o ^°j N 310 0 7 T@ / \ ry r ry - - - - N I 5 • !6 0• e 8 ` 47� 30 .886 � ssoo,°a w°o °� � • ° ^ � "' � / � \ 9�s � �-- t � � I 1 ----- � \ % K� o � 4747 O9 a�' i9� M3 1 1�t �36 hy� O88 �09Q� M •y1 'b/ 1 � R / O i2 N 9s O 03gg O 09 • 1 ? 32p2P( k`y18( la( / / A1Cl' °j49µn 38 09 °;9°p o NO o 85 k� OP`;@/d a 3ORaD, o h �,I p�3 �g 9) ♦ °38s O \ "T `ASS °I 0 ''T ° 92 • 30 8 3203, / 57 / / ��63 1eE366$`�4 O� S8� S 0 • 9 2,?8 of 'p� / • 4 9 1 i \ %� 491� t9 I w0/ ' - - I I �a0 1 ? 471 ds'3Bi " r°�_O 38 O • 1' T"� "� Er ° \ S -"s / / . 31 c < / / .yr°6 \ ' 9°S c� E \ 9 I 0 2108 'L'0 yt�E I M �17 / 0357 ry 1 9 1�� Je(3316 \ ryR o 2B� 26 'I w 9yy _ - - 1 Sg p S o Oi , • \p( 4614 2 f 3g58° ♦ moo °ss �? 8 O m d324 / ti� 30 3 / • 93 oN / 367 \ ��y \ 2j�eE?d',fl n 2 ? 9�148 I 'ts 46 "2 I 07 1 \ I ^T M rn ?9� 0 • ° / \ 39 2 ,o `, a p 324i , O \ 0 306 3 • 9 a / >'Ei� 3 \ 2858 Op ^ • ti O V ii M'� ; �S � � "10 "��v°: O 32 • 323 M � �j e� `O%/,�� �• q„� ' Kij) �3360 �.9�3\ \ 09 � �0i' O YS ° Dom° o ti ^ 71 ° • • �yO S J !i / M r' ^ �"`� 18 3361 c�� N > 1 26� 9 N ' h 205 46630 �� 0 `g ♦ n 3232�,4 ds \ 8 3 O 2Z$ / O� a 0 I 45 4594) 1 h a m 38s6 �? `S>aE�< ? 21 \2 1eE336 p(2250 298 o S) r 4583 3�E 1 `off ^, ♦ h N • ry M M 1 / 0 m 0 2628 hN Tb leE I 1 1 0 \ A "' cP • Je( 33 J\ ^��� \ / 'Lti M227g ?@ Zg ti6 s I l a I a .r S ry N o, h. N s ^ 3366 os • \ \\ ry Jeff / / / \ 321 • Y�� ~'��s3e "��S� g • %�Nq 3 2\ 3 yyc� sSA3370 oo h/o `` 2267 1 Qr m N 29 8 �5� 0 1 5 . 4) • / x(,2 gXX 9 • L�3G53� ^O" 'y SM M\9 oJ,y/ / M 1k(2 6 m N n 2m( �2 N 1 o I I ASp • '-t7 B / r y o m • M J c 3 10 `y1 ,�`'� 0 • x j / M k\ • A 'L 3837 0 oS •• yry as e 0 yb / i o \ \ s3 9°�i3 80 M wO `L2 m N• 6 F 2 N N 1 / gh1 ®s TiO, • 2 2 `�Je(32 p(3677/ "3303 \ \r 9 98g g� '\ �O Mi d 0• o \ k(3;1873/ 3 '3302�f M 33 S°� J 3�E �d'e(N 6 M A� ry 2 4 y i g �, 9� QQ�' S 2289 12629 / 8 qT°j ,I 66 p N ao � �.�5 SS �0 'L �� 6 �6' 6k � O � c I•, 2944 � f�'� � 8 `kp( \ � 03403 R�3�y • `� 6 'n J m R 9 � B ! 2288Je(. _ s 0 rr k > a, � � A•� o A 81a( X • w, -' 'T �eEM l S0 iS83 \ 226 2 B<d' 3 N m 0 383 �34j2 mho O / • O 4 J RSa�R? . 3 en W J�( Z66� I �O N \ 'Bj 1 9M - 4534 / O 4 • 71 • 38gg 8 "' 334 3R vT 498/.t 3 75 / \ 27$�a •o leE 'o M w `1 I 2g6 i 0 ) >� o kyk ^ xy, 82 ham,, p 3833 34 �00 ' y�� d • • 2 g �� 41Si,'°�33 U'N 6 / M „i` 08 / \ \ 8a0 °j Ifm� N v e 38 M2 I I 29 I \ < 2 1 5 Iro ° 4 r 3@ • m °��R�9o g ^ Oy• $ ' MDj N � O �� �µ�9\Y^ ?\\ \ ?9N Je�, ,� I,I m I e -- �• I I I'� I I I 1g �� ryMF286 12 ^ ry1 I � �\` 0 '� 2837 209��2j[ 28 2 6 o 11 �(p ry`ko ue 03825 rn ` N N 28 p3831`1404 8j8Je2810 (a0 0 / 0\ c / N o+ y° o° O ♦ ` $° c s/Z\6 ,-12@o I ° ° ,1p o ?O♦ �Oy° ; 1 2 �'' I N $1 6 00 1 I — S \ 381 ° ,'c ,$ N ^ J,I \ \ �3k a \ \ \ \ J I J I I I I h� ,s'Se � � 4J � 4. `� \ � I J I I J L---- -� I m R � � �'� � � 2 _j ° o38 /1 v° 4�ik1 o k k� / .ry�ry• o ' \' \ \\ \ �o ^� \ ' i i� \\ \ \ / / \ // / l 1 1 J 5 h �O�._ I NnN L L_ O l>0 1NN /O 0w yn 0 3ss1 \ yZ \�g0 bo J890 o c / `l i M o O p rya • \ 34S71eE 99 N ,20$2 .. D \ 9 38 O m / ° • • N \ \ v ^ .:' 3RS jek M u. i�2°Be`'O°B p \ \ \ \ ry n I / - JI I 2 9 0 It, S) , 99 O� O c // ^ > 11[ C\ ^w 3k5� 7�E3g5j 24g / o i`�cY ^yc ('l� q L $ - - J \ A 9 0 q / O RO N a JeE3 ao A `� J0F J"S O 39 `so @°� ° O k / / O?sb • 2 J� - o N,. 9? 39B 39 /c, X `°pS� 9"3' g m o S v / . y 2 tik 249 °421eE N N 01 0 "' 0)I / ti a 4 I 0° -,Pew 101 0�03 9 ��o��y , ^O)m° ? _ ♦ Om)'h �?� 2_01 ^h 2/1 /2',A1/6N9^/ry°� N ^ R�9,w 3�. �• / i 0� ? r1 V 248 �N M/$ �'�O2\ 2�' 0\3Je) 2°k/ II I I(990119.50- — — — — — 1 �0 O —---- -- -- —_ ° O 'so O� -I1 •••• I I � 021 • / 3jf �� �, 9 N / �- fi m k I O 00 ti . • 3 ' s� ��e( N N )K •.. " / `° co �0 1 s s� / % I I G 915.5 /1 1 85� QO - 230 \ 2;� / 23@ N �b� 1667 1�69 1 2 ♦�_ - jI / LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED KEY PROPERTY LINE UTILITY POLE OUTSIDE INSIDE EASEMENT LINE RETAINING WALL GAS EASEMENT GAS EASEMENT N CURB LINE - - FENCE DENOTES TREE 20650 2065 BITUMINOUS [ _ _ _ _ ] 10' CONTOUR TO BE SAVED CONCRETE 2' CONTOUR — — [7. ° �] FEMA FLOOD PLAIN DENOTES TREE TO 2065 2065 X SANITARY SEWER ----> WETLAND LINE BE REMOVED ) TREE LOCATION STORM SEWER ----->>- >> L`L`.0 00.0 TREE TAG # WATER MAIN DENOTES INLET SPOT ELEVATION-E3---- x----e3- a x - PROTECTION E.O.F. OVERHEAD UTILITY -one NOTE: ...� EMERGENCY OVERFLOW � � X E> � STORM CATCH BASIN ® ®. 000.0 REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE STORM MANHOLE o SILT FENCE -0 • • • • • - IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O TREE FENCE o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- INFORMATION. 0 25 50 100 MANHOLE O GRADING LIMITS k\A A A A A HYD MH HYDRANT GV TREELINE GATE VALVE T x (IN FEET) TELEVISION BOX ElSOIL BORING TELEPHONE BOX 313F# PHEASANT Itil1[E I31 NE Revisions: M / I HOMES T3 CARLSON sUITE1� I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan ]. Ruttger, RLA Drawn: JJO 1. NATURES REFUGE NORTH ENfiMEE�iING BLAINE, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my SURVEYINC& TEL7fif.4 :7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of ENGINEERING RLANNINCs FAX 76&AM79M Licensed Landscape Architect under Lino Lakes, Minnesota T5 CAM-WN-ENGNEEMNISECQM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_tree_plan -new tree rules.dwg A 4 ,, „ ,, L L L L�_ L L [,�_ Le,,,,, ��0 6406 0 o l06326 06,362 ° 6271 6201 O 202 / L77"'o j961 9° g1900 ,�k 87510 0 6747 06 44 p 6402 o k 794 g 0 6 520 ° s�R906153 61 °11 6407 0k • p r e' g3� i 6ti 6105 O o 62 O 6793 O • 910 N g2 06788 e h O 06795 20 0 1� oe °?` d' )E8 - - 27 6 — — — — • °�°s O %0 m '� 'S 677 067s '0�" so>>8 r h eRR ro g •) 45 32 �• 63g �co 6268)( O • '� ,a / I 0 6800° O 0 0 ° ° 6�1ry �� 6� '� A N •r `s is � O O .' or'm o°'rn Oi�� � �'rr,6 7� h I `�� / / a3°po ° 61 °,�y;1 60742 ° ^No 39 / P L 0 798 O , OS,Si9 ro g kry 1 r -g — -r> — h V yp I N 6�� ry� )BF 7'? hry I N 1 aQa 2� aE 0 181' Ol A8 0 1S ro °° 1q,1 ° 06707 ? e' � I > h m }� ti ti / 61 61 1 ro�00 COF 00 ` -1 • w m v 0y �, `�aE r)V" - - - 0 1140 6 84 67620 e O N �, g40g ° 0eR 4?7• L0h� I N k h e37SjaE )Ee l h S h' . ti �_ h /o ro As yy° h 6 7 t0 SO ° • � 6 I 3 g 7 80 `380 ° o h 5 8 6 46 w 1� R N h S ml m / 66a9 6690 p 67 9� ,,O o 737 ° °s �O�1P 616 po i O p 4j O • 9 e L — — -0 J — V f o d'S tp QD u, �f 0 6g1 e' ohm �`4m0 g 6769 6 b ��s °ems? k` x>> 0 -- 90 0 — —m — — — — S o� I s? 6 / 010� SO 00 S� 0 8) R �BR m ^ o 86�( Zk )iS? h 6 ft / 8g88 ° 6 °6'a, 66g O �O °0 07g1 66° 61 ?60 6415 0 'R l Q I rho I Ti9 m A 'SI 1 �''� 63 • • ft K 1� W 8 rr RiaE h 221 066� 6 8 4° 7 0 c' n 0 �x kky ¢4T 8 e 8 315y,�, 'fs �sSR9 tee, g ' -g2 BE N _ _ o •'� 0 _ 9 06� g4ai` o �� k 0 h,�hpg731 fO.10 'so 66443: Jai' $r / J kE N V • , / hN� b 6'1 h IQO 6 2 R, 348pi 8 6? • h h o ^ m $+��'S °e o 6-1010 O S 6 7 L ?S (�1 • ° 12° �O O o ?@O o e?mom 861gO°ge R _ 6y 388 S w m� °° ° ^h do 0 °0 o g61 • �h- ` _ 88 C� 83 7 �aE / • 61 6g28 0 qO 2 • 00 ye p(8170 OfO h 0 02o h 6 ec 0 O 66 6 1 rO gad 0r Z° o g 34 CO'6 1 6 Ohh 496 • - 893 6 78 6 O eg 9 5° r gg66 ° 0 6 31 O o 807ohhOh �° O 9 O O )rt6878 6879 6 \ g 66W / gg1 S90 o g6�1 ° „� og6 m �� ° m • )rt6877@ g6 g66pA1 0 ° m °- ho^o j 0 1 -p � 9 II pE8876 , 6 'l� / � / / I L °L ° g0� COG �( I O �AL90 ao� ° h `O h� 0°c1h °p 66 `�0°0+ °D co ^K h \ oo h° o o m o OA • i / / 2 )E68S\7 6832 N \ -0- � A a O ° p 55 �Sr 2°4531 ° 551 J514 S 0 N xO yy'�k° 0 5526 �'' ° O / ° -, °%t p 5278 S OS? 0 5 72 05 05525 5 10 \ 0 51 ^o d 550 0,5501 04820 / 0 0� 5288 � oS ' 0 / 5? Ory A I °S hN o^ ° O 483® 29 / \ yti41 �g l 0k� -0 ° ° 0 \20 48264�� 4 , / 5'83 8 � 1 � O I 55090 ° lg 4833 S4) 4� ° X',, h�hN h�oy ° 92 �- —908— p 4818 ♦%?o/3SR)° ' , °�O 2g / \ 21 O �� / o° ° 3p 0 54g O O P I p 96 rn� �� I v <o �� og'a^'q 0 59 0° 5 y49 y44g ®M 54 6 ° h0� O \ N g° 0 0 0 '� 3 0 o '� h^� `yg34 Ao / / - �/ _AA5 D r °� 461064ji 1 O o / S 546 0 5' 9�� O2 SSO 1D� ° = 4843 °o O O 5 6 0° ryp / ry O 5438 ° SR? a� °O� • �` ♦' I • • • p 57 2 �> ° 2 n t j O �46 / 48 c 9 y yyp�`'L� ?R d` �1 cP 'O • % p• • • i i1n f' •' • • ' • • S OOy�� �^ OO o / / �h h �p°`yc�ry t� D-OSy�\ ,fit O • • •�• • 'i • 1�k • 5711 Ste? �GS7 • • 5744 0 57 9 �j� ' O, o ti6 0 ?O ° > k F4 ) • 5747 40 0, 1ki 37 $ o� h� S \ S y1k � �k0 0^ 7 / / 3 0." OPO�pOOh k1 O 0 .'` ,�0 05 434 S� L ss o o y ° 0 0 °S t 80048 h ti� ? M `e' 57 O o g1x x �j ao / p / 73 ro `� .0 0 871 6 d' / 7 0 h`g' 6pa hh 0g S m 6, o p �y 0 )E6 9 fie( ,� — — — _ — 75 0 4091 40 y 9 ? / ° O� • 6 �` _ y�y �O_ — S!'- — — OO S7 V• N ° p O / O ° 6 h O 0 AO �. huh t`�6 •�� \ 7 / �683 `� , 6 ' 12 JaE 6' , 515 8 S7S O �3 ° O 6 O Fib 0 5403 ° 5408 O 620 �y0 O c O 880% ?� N '1 00 g g / 1 / o S 561 Sj off o � `�� O 23 p 185 Sg07O ko6 N �/ p � 0 0 °� O 6 �pEBg iE 3� 6 ?? R 01g S7 04089 54040 o 0 Q� p 0 N ° ro d ® • 6828 \ 1 x /O RO O 60 - ® �O 8 ° ? 0 900 1 g 1 h^ g1 —41 — 1 �$ k 9 p 10 ?O y eA6 40 8 83g7 M °s _VO ° 0 0 ao O • �( 824 0� Y 145 h his °^° Sg )g5778 / x / �� / 408,3 8R0 ° o o a� 0 841 • 6 7 yam' > yE 1 O/ O 0 / O6 h°o O \ o ° o °8 '�h //11 • 88 �0 le(6823� '` 61 )E61� I 5649 N O co 5775 / / o/ 1p 9 4O O hh ro rn � 8402°D 8 .9 ROS 84 4 p [ J 80010 • B 0 �`�' X6820 6808 1 - $S, X 56 `� �o ° )E / a / y08 1082 ° �00` o p84 3 � 22 � )E `� 'n_)E O RO / 0 ' w "m 9`pg �9 8412 8006� S i 151 / 3 • ?s ° ? M 4 S 482 O O O O -0 ° O O °� O / �O O ° Op ay I`) 23 ?) Or,, 40 °�S 0 p° 0 005 0 S• h \ 7 66� i i 61 1 °j�_ i �'> cP / ! • y 01 O c�013 5083 n?,O / q �9 e�j4 �50 g�W 8 "`,� O o O S e+> 1 J 9� ' ga36- a let hh / 5 / k. / �72 0 °7j'OSi` 0 0 0 ° Roj 0 O ti / s 0 n O ° '� 05 O O^ 801 y x, 1 _ ti ? k'`� h �� 4074 s 0 )9 p ° i O 4g N � )E6804 '� • ? S o p �s � o � � _ x `1' I g I ,�a� `�+ / O1aE �n x / y0� 05041 � p 31 4073 ro ° ° , ` 11 Op Go 0 0 �P O 0 8333 g,,_ °B°. ° 8011 h0% • 6 U 11 ` h aN " 5 O / o° R R> O /O 71 8359 SOS �6 00 o SO 2 x 6803 I >,5 119M o� y� I w I �o �y x� ? 0 'e[ 63 3 / 0 2 p 5070 0 4033 �3 4072 4069 x4900 \ 70 °° g351 O O O o 0 2 p O0 0 O 8041 00 12 �.'` a11p� �0 5 y / �Ocb 7�5 �i �o ^ 4> 05097 d ®x I \ 6337 N '�i 8332' o h0' hp'' 1 ° cpo 0 1 O�eE 7 x 111 611 x 1 U )E5997� O 2 0° O 1 O g go �5\ aD� O " � o � �P '€� N �o� • O? � � O 5g� ? oSm � a °� 9)E s x/ 4' • 4 g5g 0 °x o� 9 I \ / 0 61 — J 5643 0 78 ) n OHO • / °6 ��^ / S 5044 O ° 8348®833 p \ O O o 8330 p ° S� • • • I S 6 )E / ,'� SS O o° / 1y1 ' n �h0 oS 'O 0 �° O 83240 w - h �y gS o Sj 0 8793 a o • / ? — _ _ 6 ; > — — — x 56 6 k I r • oR oR o 1 / 324 $0\ O ` — — ' 679Xx klyry O S OSS y Y �' 1y h \ o oh O °�'S�o 4`o / 31 hh 6 57)K6 )E S 9 5 k1 b 5 8 • o° °0 0' `� SO o 9 o N ry p cV m > > e 4066 <o o N > n 6 45 1�A 58 9 ► 6 x o S° 0 p g k o >S >� d' .� 1° 0 $ • 3 24 �tp y'10 x 0 oq99 f� 5 • i�0 008 6�h0opcpS2 ,O ^ 1 dj p8794 )�0 Jg65 �. 1K i 59 I I 1 k� / ° 41 �9� o 2�,. 0 4058 I �b O v 4� p\ r° 0/ �m M \ 6583 0 0 ♦ 8 97 • • c ° 04171 p 5009 p 4064 0 0cb,,W °R°S� O M p p i Oj OD 4 • 6� N Q V 50 4 of �i O 1 p O cb 539 O % O rr S /'m0yti p 10 °S� p by h o a� • / 1 5 6537 i 5/ 4 R, k,�Ok 4 04151 O0 �S3p ° k� •o i vn 01 '1 O16°� 8768 h� roo • �/ �� ^ a+ x 578 L _ o� I 5 x 2 O / R1. 41 �110 0 5046 0 / 8787C6 oS g20 9 0 0 ` h� O�°% 5 _ x eA k � N h0 �je 7 p 8773 6'` ro ° O 7'n / ^ \ h� e h °? I 1 • • 4Zg1 / �° 4 12 p 0 ° 4043 I o O OS SRC[9 h^ 08j) �p �� 775 8 C 8732 / O^ O ' �' N �. J 8g5 x • o° O ry c 0 g?7� 4 p0 148 58130 yn �9� 44048k°, 04041 e o Igo 0 o8j \ ° 8733 O� } h ` \ 4 / 259 / R `' 0 4 ,4 148 ° °RJR h 0 n O8 0 g 1g ?S R O 74gp o O 580 �O 08 °4244 oS, • 8 / \ // 6533 s e / ° °R! R so 0 0^ ODO g O ) O O p a1 Se • / ( a0\ 653 �� �( I Rl p 42S 4r p �y' N I O i O p 87 p 8728 O 08729 0811 / \ _ _ \ g O� 6532 6522 , f�yo1 % o ' x 05$ / o ox 6 R 112 38 q0 O O h ° Oh ro O h O 1 ro g ° 8738 8714 0 8727 g7'�O /• 8 / y1 g656 g %aE� 8282 \ ry y� k�Lk°j / `O c'oi� °q II 01 p 8722 ® 0°O ^d p p 8737 ° 8�' 0'�`1 �'` o� / �j o �0 6 46 m 6'? / ^ O 4 4114 ° 1'1° 9b�° If I 403 081 °j h^ ro 87 3 ° p 8715 N 6125 d • \ e g �52 �IaE }� 1 J \ / o ti� O O O 4184 h 50 O \ O o ) / 106 $1 0 wj , O / 4 52 4240 p 4116 c g6 p h O o O h d'j O O / 0 ^h ? �01 0� rn0 87 0 0 $ O n l8 ^ l O 8724 x 9 � 213 k1 R. 8124 l��/ / / �� � e O /'� 4a 5111 ^ ry 1 O > \ / -. >� 194 °, o )E65 23 )K617, 41 / � � � � � m� � 08 ° �� • � �� // h N Moro �? • \ 6030 % O O �g O 1 1 �8 $ \ o BYO � ry •-�-•.43 -� g ,0 07 +- j _-__4 7 �q So • • • N �� $'L6 Sep S IB' 'he( >9 \ \ \ 07�1? 906 y 1 °9� �` 8 / 82 h \ 27 •g�`' 7p� OS °Si \ \ \ JK6099 lryyk �.h /0 80 81 )E81 ! \ \ \/ / !( 29 6 dy S \ \ / �? ^N N � 07224^Fy^y $ ♦ 7233 p I x o�OrO•i \ `�� °`34 r?� `r9 Sig n �- `y o 7227 7229 'hh 8673 S B \ S 0 6' \ SA q O 0 p ay`t d> O ti 8684 )a(8666 l ` fn x 03� 6• O p o 21 z26 xsls ��t , .1 \ a e 26785g$9� �4r°; >� M 37 6 3 /O 1 \ 6 S2 h0 rnH ♦� _>d_0725j _ 0 225 0906 0723 )� ^ ... `h �k1 q pgg259 h ss�sOgs ho )KN g03S 5g •�- • s��_ - �,-� 8�1 4pq 8165 1) � \ 1 $ c� �°r cj1 g8g O \ p � // •Ja�` / O h tO h • • ,� ` �. ° N w lei°° \ / / -P0 055� 0 0 °�'-�- �0 0 1 • �i ,�1a ,`�E t`3n s • o / 885657866pa°�I' �h�kN S,S'So ,o'er, y. / =D $5 2 N �('. h`h�\ \\g9-6)K �k h0 6 ••S9 y9 of L — J ° o ° off_ ag31 0� q�d L 2455� V 53N 1p"6 9'Y i 6+ ° / / \ •kp Oho \ \ �' Qc�prd o R � ^h c�S o nit Nrn �e ♦ x�g5 °jo� 99, ��� \ / S $ 5— / o t000`°�o O O �N >• ao y^/ w 1 .�A9 44pn�2�tO; a , }°od`�24� Nao o,9�S h hoc�\ `b �_L/ �/601 �6 1 9•0DSO� h 8 37 N �0-"- '&• 5°'6g° y/ 6 et�73'bi_� LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UTILITY POLE EASEMENT LINE RETAINING WALL CURB LINE - - - = FENCE BITUMINOUS [ - - - ] 10' CONTOUR — — 2' CONTOUR — — - DEN CONCRETE [ - _—:1 FEMA FLOOD PLAIN SANITARY SEWER ----> WETLAND LINE STORM SEWER - - - - ->>- >> 00. 0 "" •" DEN WATER MAIN ---- DENOTES INLET SPOT ELEVATION -=3---- X - r-- .a x -- A -" PROTECTION E.O.F. OVERHEAD UTILITY ohe EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 41 43 X STORM CATCH BASIN ® ® ;r , IF 000.0 STORM MANHOLE ® SILT FENCE + • • • • • - OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O TREE FENCE ®o 0 0 0 0 0 0 MANHOLE O GRADING LIMITS HYD 0 0 0 0 HYDRANT 1 MH TREELINE (__Y__Y_'Y�. GV GATE VALVE x TP TV TELEVISION BOX ❑ SOIL BORING TB TELEPHONE BOX ❑ R 5570 5584 / 4\ O° O S2yrgg 0 ?So� 0 718s��,° 0 8', 8 0 5587 O �iS S O b S? 70 0 y `�° k p S2 54 yti 1 ° ?B g�yZ'I° ? aS h 5574„®� 5556° °c� ° 9 ti o / iS' S43/`N" 0 p 258 SsO ' 8 0 o SS \ 270 730 555 0h crcS O8 ® O ?j0 O 05518 5515 / cS p`P'6, IS2S :?6, cPo SO 55 SS SSj o 0 O 1 005 411 k 01 �8 0 ° °os 7 o S� JK59�1� • g313 79 42/p ��O 41930 4185 Ory^) 0 17 °k$ kg `9 a ° ° 0 04875 I 1& o o '`�? p411 ?S® o`v0 � oy°o 05°5 O°' °' �°'O \ 0192 �r10 k.�rL"� 41 g O hq-O 8 0 50 48 O g ° �7j0 OD 4874 / 0ve O / 194 ko Rj �: p 4188 R�9 \ g4 �O `� Op O o 4 01 412 '� K� O o 505 o p'� OSo o ° 2� rag ei O 4374 o 4383 0 o O h1ip 4814 °° O ° 0 0° 0 0 4246 '?,9 k'` ,Ly6° ° p 51 �0� 0 ti^., ♦ ?? ti 92 �� ° 4369 R p 47 p° 86 y p 2 307 O °SS h O'1 S � 4357 43g-1 ° 4ga90 0 k1`�o R�?) O 4189 ^Oh O�! ° 08° \ 4368 ° 20j o 4399 ° 0 9190 1° \ ogg26 8y °o O oR ° 0 ° p 238 9° �10° h o^ 00 2jS 1 ^ 52060 / �--� `L k 1 'p�j�\ cS 7 9 / ° ° � `9A O ' s� , °0439 ° �g ? �� ?� \?sue ° 0 0 4810 �9 Se Oc o 4981 0 O �4 7 4192 s 0 S ° 53 ° p 531 pS OS oS sy� Oa y000 O 40209 42808 klgk 9j k19 O �h M �SO �`js 0 -¢ w 20 SO 4 4 06 ktio, k� � � y 3 ° p 42 1 O tl oft, S '1 O S78 h 0 05317 %N R 40 S 04 9 A cb O�SOSSIp G 1g y1�01 ,�� SO O 1 �? \ 49 98 � R c �, 0 0 1 O�05224 4339 3 ® 3p O ?1?0 S° kry�Sr74 0���� 0 0 0 �Sp ° 0 222 bt - O O 4325 9g x S 0 428— y ,��, 37o O O 50 �L O 520 0`'2 5136 2 �19° o _ _ S OR 4273 Oo '�` 00 �0 51 ° S�9 ti 5192 10� O 0 4317 o3j8 84 $ ` O ?Ss p 5173 ,,� O S y'`h 5189 ° 4 °O o o O p 203 4769 \ 9gy ♦ 0 y L429O 4805 y11,� Ro 0 5130 '`9 p 202 Lhhk o 0 429O 284 O o1 os�0 1 OUTSIDE INSIDE N GAS EASEMENT GAS EASEMENT OTES TREE 20650 2065 TO BE SAVED OTES TREE TO 2065 2065 x BE REMOVED TREE LOCATION TREE TAG # WTA REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT 0 25 50 100 INFORMATION. (IN FEET) ENfiMEE1iIN�i �A�L�N 3690 PHEASANT RIDGE I� NE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan ]. Ruttger, RLA or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: JJO evlslons. 1, M / I HOME S �LAINE, MN �445 MN BLAITEL �� SURVEYING NF direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive ENGINEERING PLANNING s FAX76MAM7 Licensed Landscape Architect under �N-ENQNEIIfIN iCDM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 c� St. Louis Park, MN 55416 \ Date: 04/25/251f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03-tree-plan - new tree rules.dwg NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T4 of / T5 7t J`71 G—VJ LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE ------ BITUMINOUS CONCRETE [ SANITARY SEWER > STORM SEWER >>— >> WATER MAIN --- DENOTES INLET PROTECTION OVERHEAD UTILITY ohe — STORM CATCH BASIN �" STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE O HYDRANT � MH cv GATE VALVE D4 TV TELEVISION BOX TELEPHONE BOX UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — 2' CONTOUR — FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE 00.0 SPOT ELEVATION -Ea---- x ----ram- x — E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 43 �*3 X Ej> 000.0 SILT FENCE -0 0 0 0 0 0- TREE FENCE o0000000 - GRADING LIMITS A A A TREELINE SOIL BORING TIP / Q i I - I � I I 9 Ug 9 `1Q0 I� 1-11-1-1-1-1 NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. _ Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards I \ (Non —ESA) NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AREA (NREA) NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA (NRCA) Tree Tree Location: not Location: within Basic Use Area within Basic Use Environmentally Area deciduous deciduous deciduous Sensitive Area (ESA) Category trees 6" dbh trees 6-12" trees over and over or dbh or 12" dbh or evergreen evergreen evergreen trees trees trees over between between 20' tall 12'-20' tall 12'-20' tall Nan -ESA provide provide no mitigation one tree two trees required per tree per tree removed removed tural Resou onse n provide provide provide Ar tural one tree per two trees three trees Reso ridor four trees per tree per tree hanc nt removed removed removed A ral Res provide one provide provide rea tree per two two trees three trees trees per tree per tree removed removed removed LEGEND PROPOSED NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AREA BASIC -USE AREA BOUNDARY _ GAS EASEMENT AREA (TREES NOT SIGNIFICANT IN THIS AREA) 9p 6 I I I III I I II I I. I I II I I I I II � 000 00 R C 9p6 I I I II I� II I II A�l /JA -1 1 --1-1 1-1 J1 -1 -1 -1� UFVFO (1) (2) (3) REPLACEMENT RATIO J� `x Non -Basic Use Non -Basic Use Environmentaly Area (6-12" dbh Area (over 12" Basic Use Sensitive Area (ESA) deciduous or dbh deciduous Area Category 12 - 20' or over 20' evergreen) evergreen) Non -ESA 457.0 98.98 33.66 Natural source 0.0 13.26 1-3 Conservation Area Natural Fbsource 1777.444 9861972 1972 131 - 393 Enhancement Area x \ 96 \ IL J `o 'Non -Significant Trees Removed: 138 Total Replacement Trees Required: 3002 trees \ \ +_906 / ' Non significant trees are defined as: Quality> 1, Diameter-6. Green Ash, White Ash, Amur Maple, Norway Maple, SiNer Maple, Siberian Elm, / Olin-- - BLn 6 — rb 907.79 Cottonwood. and Colorado Spruce. \ �YV n =^�° \ / 3t3 tPHEASANT N DR NE Revisions: M/I HOMES CARLSON SUITE 10 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Drawn: JJO 1, ENGINEERING BLAINE. MN or report was prepared by me or under my SURVEYING TEL76&4M7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive ENGINEERING PLANNING' FAX76&4W79M Licensed Landscape Architect under CARLS€IrN-ENGlNEEMNrMM the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 o 912�\ 0 100 200 400 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK i. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 set in the ground in a covered tube located 150 feet westerly of the centerline of Rondeau Road West and \ \ 40 feet northerly of the centerline of C.S.A.H. No. 14. Elevation-894.88 \ (NAVD 88) 2. Top Nut Hydrant East of the Southeast \ entrance to Lino Lakes Elementary School. Elevation=920.01 (NAVD 88) NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota T5 TREE MITIGATION of T5 11 r A 4 � ^ � Date: 04/25/251 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412.03—tree—mitigation - new tree rules.dwg tt J`t1G—VJ CITY OF LINO LAKES LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ♦ s I I 1. BOULEVARD TREE STANDARDS. BOULEVARD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT THE RATE OF ONE TREE PER LOT FRONTAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO—FAMILY LOTS. BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE PLANTED S ♦ y�� / \ \ I \ WITHIN 14 FEET OF THE CURB LINE OR AS OTHERWISE DETERMINED BY THE CITY FORESTER. 9 TREES REQUIRED = 99 (93 LOTS, INCLUDING 6 CORNER LOTS) sy �. gas--\ o - / TREES PROVIDED 309 (MIN 3 TREES PER LOT) 13 I 3 6 �L J / I ANDALL STREETitff o \ I \ � I U I I I IT/ NI ij F I11 M 111011�11116, �1 Yi10■0'" i1A:�\I OUTLOT B II 1 � 1 I / WETLAND 1 I �7 U9 \m I \ 5 \ 4 , 4 \/ obi A _ / OUTLOT D LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION START. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND THAT AFFECT THE WORK SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING OR APPROVING ANY ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED. 2. UTILITY LOCATES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND VERIFYING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW. IN MINNESOTA, CALL GOPHER STATE ONE —CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. ALL LOCATES AND ITEMS NOTED AS 'FIELD VERIFY' ON THE PLANS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE. 3. PERMITS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THAT THE REQUIRED PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 4. EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, TREES, SITE AMENITIES, ETC. THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY DAMAGE (AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE) TO EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN. 5. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND ACCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SITE ACCESS WITH THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE ACCESS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LONG—TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON —SITE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. ALL WASTE AND/OR UNUSED MATERIAL SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 6. SITE REMOVALS. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR GENERAL SITE REMOVALS. ALL ITEMS NOTED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND IMMEDIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF —SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE WITH OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR ANY ITEMS NOTED AS 'REMOVED BY OTHERS' OR 'REMOVE AND SALVAGE.' 7. UTILITY COORDINATION. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO PROPOSED UTILITIES. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS FOR SITE ELECTRICAL WORK AND SITE LIGHTING. 8. CONSTRUCTION STAKING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING CONTROL POINTS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION FIELD STAKING DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. 9. DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT/WALKWAY, OR OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. PLAN QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL MATERIAL QUANTITIES PER PLAN. MATERIAL SCHEDULES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. 11. REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN THIS PROJECT ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING ORDER: 1. ADDENDA, WITH THOSE OF A LATER DATE HAVING PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE OF AN EARLIER DATE. 2. LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PLAN DRAWINGS. 4. PLANT / MATERIAL SCHEDULES. 5. CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. 6. MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. 00 \ C) / 1 / I OUTLOT A / ' WETLAND ���\ \ 9\ ♦ �� rn f� ♦ _ -A \ s� ♦ s� CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 0 50 100 200 (IN FEET) Know what's below. Call before you dig. ENGMEEflIN£s CARLSON 31lPHEASANT RIDGEDRNE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: RJR Revisions: 1. 04/25/25 -Per City Comments M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY L1 SLJ VEYING $LAINE, MN 55449 TEL763.4W7900 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: 64—@#K7 Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 of ENGINEERING :PLANNING FAX763.4W7� Licensed Landscape Architect under Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 Lino Lakes, Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 €ARLS€�N-ENGNEEENGMP4 the laws of the State of Minnesota St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 save Date: 04 25 25 1 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwgA 4 7t J`71 L—U— FM I I — \ _ —904 � \ \ + - - - _ 3 - + I �� os—_ -- -- — I }+ 1 � +- + J + + + + + + + + + --� + 9 / \ WETLAND + I - - - • o I + - — — } I \ _ } + • + +++ � I I 2 4 \ 902 ` } ++ \ PP II IIII— II }+ 1 _ I I — +}+ II + + } � ► � + � 1 � �� — IIII +} }„` I , I I� � I -- ---i I I � --_i / � soo } }FWo1 T ++ } 5 , +++\G �I I J 4} +} + �� •+}+ 2 4 2 }++ } 890 "2 (980S 14.0 G 91410 GI '914.0 880 + _ �� \ + \ \ WETLAND BUFFER �� / / � 1 1 U, `97 /\ 870 \ \ SIGN TYP. � / / � �—��� \ 3 � � IIII I _ 1 - \ , �� I I-I-I-I-�-I °cP • s > } I I I I \ \\ ✓/ \ _ � \ ,,,JL < SB \ \ \ co I II 4 \ \ I I II 3 3 III � 1 I - - I I \ \ \ \ I r II \ II IIIRM TT�� �� =T—I +} + \}} ++++ + }+}+}+} + + / IHL 1� 3 7 ++ I WETLAND � � oo � I O ......XY\\� y/ilMi a ~qi 'NY P� � \ ____ —_—_ IIII III I `t h %" � � 9 II •`�, •o�' � � °m° 0U TOOT C / v? / --- III 18 / / �, ` �I� I I I Ex. POND � B F / I � I � � � � I— OB — I I 2 -� ++ r I OUTLCT cn °�� rnl 1+ I o , I LAKE 1� / I J WO / I ��I c� I li o�n o 11� —_—� + IIII BL � co ICI III + I � I of m \ I�I 00 ;2 r oe I I II ��9osBF — \\ —° IIIII BB --- �1- 1 I oo I IIII + m } N 1 I — I -� I � 6 / 1 0/� O \ \\ �/ 4 \ o no I� + \ \ � —�, '°i 21 \\\ \ \ WETLAND /' I 6% \ \ \ I I i IIII ——f,,,,, o - / O 3 \ + t + 9j ems? gio 4%� — \off' H O / 3 I 22 � 2 3 ` A , 91 KC + \ / o 0 HoHO 24 r 1 .o \ ! 4 19, POND sos wo \ II \i ' ++} 10 A / o ++}+++ 1 v I 3 �� vo / / / 977.0 / / / - \I 25 / <908s / r\, / \ \� WETLAND ° / / (9o8�s�, l ���•>\% 8 92 RB 2 \ ° / / II \ IIIIII iI ` ,\� , .° / o / J / \\ r 908.0 3 " G 9 g08 0 (908.5) /9\ 90g 5) / (9 o9S l I I /go - _ \ 0 7 \ 0 � 0) / , , 1 41 gob 3 6 ---- 1 g08.5 I 97> (9700� 909.o I I y g16.o I IIII } + 71 G 916.5 u9 �q -I-I-I �. I= 7 � -I-II �-�� =1 = 11 � FBL SB -j j -I 9 FM > OB BB �s 4 2 II I -I -I- � _III ; � I G I \ 906 9 7�° / / 97)8 -IIIII IIIII G g17,0 I I 912— � 910- \ \ \ \ \ ' RB • • �� / (97° / / G 0 G I (909.5) \ \ \ / 90 0 / 917, g 17 I G 917.0 I I G \ \ 3 Cg09.5) 90g•o WP / 9.o <97 90* d\ W TLAND eon / 9S (909. I 5 909.0 I, 90g 0� (909.5) \g.0 I \ `,,__,-�I ' \J L 4 ` •��-+ •-- u \ \ \ I I rn / / 909.0 - L------� I I I 9p8 1 4', I _.j OUTLU u 0 30 60 120 +44% LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT SOUTH 40B42) (IN FEET) x� _ 3 PHEASANT RIDGE DR NE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC L2 CARLSON SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Drawn: RJR 1. 04/25/25 -Per City Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY EN�MEEflIN£s or report was prepared by me or under my SLJ VEYINC BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL763.4W7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 Of ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX76&4W7� Licensed Landscape Architect under Lino Lakes, Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 €ARLS€�N-ENIGINEE�iING.t�M the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwg � A 4 .� ^ n 7t JY1L— �9 Y PLAN 5" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TT-P.) TREE WRAP 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER 5' STEEL TEE POST- 3 REQUIRED AT 120 5ACKFILL MIX UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REMOVE BURLAP � ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 1�/ DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL � NOT TO SCALE I. SCARIFY 50TTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE 501L OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 5ACKFILL SOIL INSTALL PLANT $O THE ROOT FLARE 15 AT OR UP TO 2" A50VE THE FINISHED GRADE. 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT 5ACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATS REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE. 5. PLUMB AND 5ACKFILL WITH 5ACKFILL SOIL. 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 1. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST 5E SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE z ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. _ 6. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 46 HOURS OF III THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE n CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL JL7 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- Iro' POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MID I-1/2' WIDE STRAP (TYP) DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-1" ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MNDOT 3401) 0 160° O.G. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE 2 12 UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY 12 LINES AND STAKES -GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE 4'-6' SHREDDED BARK MULCH EXISTING GRADE --MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.) UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SU5601L \ 910 \ ,, 3 `r4MYlYb l4 — ` \\ • a 908 \ 9j4 WP '— HL 3 .0 I l woe �/ c 914 13 \ i / I 0 914\ � � \\ 60 U TtQ T B + ++ ' o+-- 0)1: sos WETLAND \ +�� HL BH �� \�\ \ I �_Q\ 1 2 2 ++ °8 04TL4 A\ \ ++ \\ I \ I I \\\ \\ NDSC ]PE ]PLAN ENS R E ENT e N®RTE 0 30 60 120 43) (IN FEET) 3 PHEASANT ROGE DR NE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC L3 CARLSON SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Drawn: RJR 1. 04/25/25 -Per City Comments NATURES REFUGE NORTH PRELIMINARY ENGMEEflIN£s or report was prepared by me or under my SLJ VEYINC BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL763.4W7 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: Designed: RJR 5354 Parkdale Drive # 100 Of ENGINEERING PLANNI NC. FAX 763.4 79 Licensed Landscape Architect under Lino Lakes, Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN III €AMKMN-ENGNEEWN==p4 the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwg 4 . ^ n 7t J`71 L—VJ CARLSON ENGINEERING PHEASANT RODE DR NE SUITE 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my $LAINF. MN SFA49 SURVEYING TEL 76K4M791 direct supervision and that I am a duly ENGINEERING PLANNING FAX763.4W75� Licensed Landscape Architect under CAARLSON-ENGNEERINGMM the laws of the State of Minnesota LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS 1. TREE PROTECTION. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR MARKED ON SITE FOR REMOVAL SHALL REMAIN PROTECTED AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND TO THE DRIP LINE, WITHIN WHICH NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MATERIAL STORAGE, OR VEHICLE PARKING SHALL BE PERMITTED. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START PER PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND SHALL CONSIST OF 4' TALL HEAVY DUTY ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH 6' STEEL FENCE POSTS SPACED 6' O.C. MAX. 2. EROSION CONTROL. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP), AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER BMPS, INCLUDING SILT FENCE, BIO—ROLLS, INLET PROTECTION, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETING, DUST CONTROL, SWEEPING AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE PERMANENT STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE DISTURBED AREA HAS CEASED. IN THE EVENT PERMANENT STABILIZATION CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 7 DAYS, TEMPORARY STABILIZATION BMPS MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 7 DAYS USING RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3. 3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL AREAS INDICATED AS BEING DISTURBED OR OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, STUMPS, BRUSH, GRASS, ROOTS AND OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL AT AN APPROVED OFF —SITE DISPOSAL LOCATION. 4. SOIL PREPARATION. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY REQUIRED SOIL CORRECTIONS, AMENDMENTS OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (IF APPLICABLE). EXISTING TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED FROM ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILED IN AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR RE —SPREAD. ALL AREAS WHERE SOIL HAS BEEN COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND THAT ARE INDICATED TO BE SODDED, SEEDED OR PLANTING BED SHALL BE DE —COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES BY SOIL RIPPING, TILLING OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL LOOSENING METHOD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY IRRIGATION, SEEDING, PLANTING, SODDING, ETC. 5. TOPSOIL MATERIAL. ALL EXISTING, AMENDED OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT TOPSOIL TYPE A. A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE RE —SPREAD OR PLACED ON ALL AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, INCLUDING DISTURBED OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE FINE GRADED, RAKED AND DRAGGED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. TOPSOIL GRADES SHALL BE WITHIN .1 FEET OF INDICATED FINISHED GRADE AND SHALL BE TRUE TO GRADIENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR FILTRATION BASIN SOIL REQUIREMENTS (IF APPLICABLE). 6. SEEDING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES AND TOPSOIL PREP PRIOR TO SEEDING. APPLY 10-10-10 TYPE I STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 200 LBS PER ACRE PRIOR TO SEEDING. SEEDS SHALL BE SOWED AT THE INDICATED RATE, VIA BROADCAST SPREADER, DROP SEEDER OR DRILL SEEDER. FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION, INSTALL CATEGORY 20 — STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH NATURAL NETTING ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1. IN ALL OTHER AREAS, APPLY DISC —ANCHORED TYPE 3 MULCH (MCIA CERTIFIED WEED FREE GRAIN STRAW) AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SOIL SHALL BE KEPT MOIST DURING ESTABLISHMENT WITH ADDITIONAL RE —SEEDING AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE A HEALTHY, UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS, FREE OF WEEDS AND WITH COVERAGE EXCEEDING 75% IN ANY 10'x10' AREA PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 7. SODDING. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES AND TOPSOIL PREP PRIOR TO SODDING. APPLY 10-10-10 TYPE I STARTER FERTILIZER AT A RATE OF 200 LBS PER ACRE PRIOR TO SODDING AND ROLL TOPSOIL TO CREATE A UNIFORM SURFACE FOR LAYING SOD. SOD SHALL NOT BE CUT MORE THAN 24—HOURS IN ADVANCE OF INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP SOD MOIST FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SOD UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 8. PLANT MATERIAL. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," ANSI—Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. NO SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS. ALL REQUESTS FOR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING TO THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. 10. PLANT INSTALLATION AND ESTABLISHMENT. REFER TO STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE. 11. MULCH MATERIAL. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR ROCK MULCH AS INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS, SOIL, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER A NON —WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (INCIDENTAL) OR OTHER APPROVED WEED BARRIER TO A MINIMUM SETTLED DEPTH OF 4". MULCH SHALL BE HELD BACK FROM PLANT STEMS/TRUNKS A MINIMUM OF Y. WOOD MULCH SHALL BE PLACED AROUND INDIVIDUAL TREES TO A 4' MINIMUM DIAMETER. MULCH SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 48—HOURS OF PLANT INSTALLATION. 12. MAINTENANCE. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE MOWING, TRIMMING, WATERING, FERTILIZING, WEED AND PESTICIDE CONTROL, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE —SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 13. WATERING. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF SEED AND INSTALLATION OF PLANTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS AND TURF AREAS A MINIMUM OF ONCE A WEEK. MORE FREQUENT WATERING MAY BE REQUIRED DURING PERIODS OF HOT, DRY WEATHER. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. IN THE ABSENCE OF PERMANENT IRRIGATION, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION, TREE WATERING BAGS, OR HAND —WATERING ARE ACCEPTABLE. 14. NATIVE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. THIS PROJECT INCLUDES ONE OR MORE NATIVE PLANT SEED MIXES CONSISTING OF A VARIETY OF GRASSES, SEDGES AND FLOWERING FORBS. BECAUSE THESE PLANTS TYPICALLY HAVE A LONGER GERMINATION PERIOD, A COVER CROP SPECIES IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER AND STABILIZATION. MAINTENANCE OF THESE SEEDED AREAS IS CRITICAL DURING THE FIRST SEVERAL YEARS TO ESTABLISH A SUCCESSFUL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED / WEED —WHIPPED TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES IN MID—JULY AND EARLY SEPTEMBER DURING THE FIRST 2-3 YEARS OF ESTABLISHMENT. IN ADDITION, ALL NON—NATIVE SPECIES / WEEDS SHALL BE SPOT SPRAYED NO LESS THAN 3 TIMES A YEAR WITH HERBICIDE BY A LICENSED APPLICATOR. RE —SEEDING AS NECESSARY SHALL OCCUR IN MAY. A NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED NO SOONER THAT 3 YEARS AFTER INITIAL SEEDING — ONCE THE COVER CROP HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY REPLACED BY NATIVE PLANTS AND THE AREA IS FREE OF ALL NON—NATIVE AND INVASIVE SPECIES. AT THIS TIME, MAINTENANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO MOWING / WEED —WHIPPING TO A HEIGHT OF 6-10 INCHES ONCE A YEAR IN EARLY SEPTEMBER AND SPOT SPRAYING OF HERBACIDE ONLY AS NEEDED. 15. FINAL ACCEPTANCE. UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK IN WRITING BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF ANY WORK IS FOUND TO BE INCOMPLETE OR UNSATISFACTORY IN THE OPINION OF THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, A WRITTEN PUNCH LIST WILL BE PREPARED LISTING ALL ITEMS THAT REQUIRE COMPLETING OR CORRECTING BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 16. WARRANTY. ALL PLANTS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND MATERIAL. Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA Drawn: RJR Signature: Designed: RJR Date: 3/4/25 License #: 56346 1 Date: 3/4/25 Revisions: 1. 04/25/25 - Per City Comments PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME �COMMONNAME SIZE CONTAINER TREES • RM 16 Acer rubrum 'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2" Cal. B&B • FM 18 Acer x freemanii 'Sienna' Sienna Glen Maple 2" Cal. B&B 0 RB 12 Betula nigra Clump Form, 2" Cal Equivalent River Birch Multi -Trunk 8' Ht. B&B • HB 8 Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 2" Cal. B&B • HL 14 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ' Harve' Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 2" Cal. B&B • KC 14 Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso' Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Cal. B&B • WO 37 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" Cal. B&B • HO 8 Quercus x macdanielii 'Clemons' TM Heritage Oak 2" Cal. B&B • BL 16 Tilia americana 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden 2" Cal. B&B • AE 14 Ulmus americana 'Princeton' American Elm 2" Cal. B&B CONIFEROUS TREES BF 16 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6' Ht. B&B • BH 15 Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6' Ht. B&B Q) PP 11 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine 6' Ht. B&B NWiuriu tivw` a • WP 17 Pinus strobus White Pine 6' Ht. B&B ORNAMENTAL TREES OB 9 Aesculus glabra 'JN Select' TM Early Glow Ohio Buckeye 1.5" Cal. B&B SIB 18 Amelanchier x grandiflora Autumn Brilliance' Clump Form, 1.5" Cal Equivalent Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7' Ht. B&B BB 15 Carpinus caroliniana Native Blue Beech 1.5" Cal. B&B HT 13 Crataegus crus-galli ' Inermis' Thornless Hawthorn 1.5" Cal. B&B CA 17 Malus x ' Prairifire' Red Flowers Prairifire Crabapple 1.5" Cal. B&B JL 21 Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' White Flowers Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal. B&B GROUND COVERS SOD 88,633 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod Type I - Turf Seed Mix TI 79,793 sf Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods MnDOT Southern Boulevard (SB) seed Seeding Rate 160 Ib/ac Type II - Native Seed Mix (Buffer) TII 105,301 sf Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods MnDOT Southern Tallgrass Roadside (STR) seed Seeding Rate 39 Ib/ac Type III - Stormwater Seed Mix TIII 103,774 sf Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods MnDOT Wet Ditch (WD) seed Seeding Rate 30 Ib/ac M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L4 of 4 #5412-03 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\landscape\5412-03_landscape.dwg LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE ----------- ----------- CURB LINE ___________ ------------- ------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER ------- STORM SEWER---->r---->� -> >� �----------I---------� I I 1 \ WATER MAIN----I-----I DENOTES INLET I OVERHEAD UTILITY PROTECTION ,� STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE I I I \ / �/ / / OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE I I i �/ /� d // \ ' \• i\`•� MANHOLE HYD MH I I / / °°6 HYDRANT �C? cv GATE VALVE T TELEVISION BOX ❑ TB -906--J TELEPHONE BOX ❑ /� I I FEMA ZONE A FLOODPLAIN LINE / \ \ UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL 90 906---�\ \ \ \� WETLAND AI 6 \ Cr \ FENCE ----0- ----` / \ ' i-- \ 100 YR HWL = 904.1 \ RCWD FLOODPLAIN �- Q DAY SNOWMELT 904.5 �- J \ ` 10' CONTOUR - -- \ r \ \\ �` , --904 LINE (904.5) -� ---- - `- 1= \ \ de 2' CONTOUR �- •� \\ 9 // -� --sos--------- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN - - - - �\ \\\ \�---/ / o o ,*� - -51.3 WETLAND LINE ------- \� \\ `\ , `\��72\�---- -F_' ros \ -sos ° --- ---i---------- SPOT ELEVATION /� �� vvA 00.0 _ l o i \ E.O.F. W TL -\------- \ - l � 900 / •/ -- • - s\ \� EMERGENCY OVERFLOW �03 x E CRT-qCA- WH L F'�9105.0 \ \-----� \ - 1.s \ -- - --- •\ \\` 000.0-(SNOWMELAI� .............. SILT FENCE TREE FENCE ................ _ \ / \ � '\ \\ e° �•, \ ULAJ' Il / \-_----- \ a a TREELINEv \ ��vvv o� -�_ o ti`'�• \ � �� � � � I vv vv'� x -� / V0 `.� vvv �� \�� -� vvv /�// / �' • �� ��3 SOIL BORING \, \ \ L �\ -- 1 s I I• �° o �� , v � V \,\ \ � � v � � . �- � I � i � � '\ s o ' \ I � � o o�� s�, oo • `'off A TH / ••' xo FEMA FLOODPLAIN FP v WETLAND 30 I - CRITICAL HWL = 906.0 D \ � I I I � g \ DITCH RCWD FLOODPLAIN fp fp -ro fi- �--��� v v�� I I P vv v (SNOWMELT) - _ - _ mo� 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.5 �2 7 it � 100 YR HWL 904.1 �� ✓ �� vv oa a POND 300 \ �a (PER RCWD MODEL oa' --� a NWL = 902.0 CRITICAL HWL = 904.6 /� ' • �' • A' O� �v A \ �` / / / 21� i / �6 T -- --- ° a. �..a (SNOWMELT) .• I o a a� I \ 1'Vol /. ��o (-906\ I I I ,eq2•' ---�-_�� 1�� ./ �\ ``� v•o'eo A� / �� v_ 906� �� \ .rn A - � - _ -/ 4 / o I I �b .•goo- ��� [�Tp j/ BOO v • ' �' A' v v \ I / / / / / 73 - -� s I °,', ' v • s <V -tea--= ' / - �!" I LAKE 300 NWL = 902.0/ CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 I I 05s - \ WETLAND 35 �. - _� l / / / / •�oss�, - ��-- •,: • ' ----------- �• o \ / N - L \ (SNOWMELT) O� I I l 'I� /I// i _ \\ • �\ \'\ \ \ CRITICAL HWL = 906.1 \ - s � \\ •. `� \ �\ `\ , i (SNOWMELT) \ NWL i.• CRITICAL HWL = 906.6 \ o ` \\'. \ \ \\\I/ • • ----- eoF' -- ---- _- T\ n 1tt 1q 1 / o ao oes a i dj \ WETLAND 55 (SNOWMELT) �� '•; \�� v� •� 2.0 _ r v o \ �s v v V '\ \ � vos.3• - �� e i v � o�° o g80 l i . I I CRITICAL HWL = 904.3 �•• �V v� . A V� v�� • • or-- _ �- \ I �/ / (100 YR)EOF I ' 11)7 / / . \ - 908 • 09.0 09.0 � \\ \ `\• \ - \ / • I -- / •• m J • �`� i I i •o � r- --1 f - i --� �s � �� vvv V A \ � v � ; � ,, \ V 1.4 � •*110 °ys I I ---- l �---- / / to.o ' �� \\ \ \ �"/ �\ \\ I I � �� <\ i .J/ ��`� oe.b -,_ /' co i� �� �.\e � - *o °'�. � �t � �� � \\ 7 . s•• ��o o A 7__� %� 17 ••.0g0 vvv \�\�\\ wvv II ���`, �� \ �� 1.6 22�i �� o�s �, s�moo. l ���Cy��� i `� � `�� � \�. . T y sos ♦ 11.3 \ U 7 i '•. v A, �� > �� '� / / �-sos • .. ti5 - /� 90 � � � � i AA '•••'• eoo ���*e`�i - I I -- \ �N J L�-fir � _/ / \ o � \ s ♦, \ �\ ' i � `9 �\ 1.7 / �' 7 � 0 1 * �o.• i � ••�• � • \ \ \ , r� ,0' P I / / / . \ y \• �\ 2 i 8 / /. / / / / ` / °o '�.. _// o, - --i • -�-- / F +-,, \ it o I I I I A \ \ 'v°. ---��. /// // ••• wvv V� \\\ �w i y�z �9_/ I- �/ � �o� //0�oos - ,,��� pea,, �� � �f ����i � /- ••••• �•;:•' � .���\ 1 si \ ll y / I it I RB \ I � � \ V O � y� • •• � \ \ vv i / / / � oc ---� e0 I 1 1 �, � i�::: �i •�� � � MONO \A� \ • tih • \ \ / 9� r- l\ / � � - - .o \ \ \ \ lib?/ � 1, i \ 3. < \ / I I � �' a I I \b ,�•� 74\004 / / / _ 906V0 /--s,a=<, a� /�_ 9An-� �.o �' �� q ICI �v. / ' � v � � i v I ' 11 d 8�.PIPE v % fj vL• o� NWL 100 YR HWL = 903.8 10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904. "�e - sF• ° v A • L_ _ ( vnor- z PER RCWD MODEL) 0 50 100 200 F- I f �, / / ' ��i �� /� i I � / I \ ,-,'V � i ,ye. � � 2.4 �� 3�1 / �����A I � � � � �� 907 v v / i /, i , / / i. \ � --- - � �% ; A - - ,/✓• . as 5 o s e • �� �A o -1 ,�5 •'•.• \ _ _ /� / / / yv L ice-'- �E \ V OHO A A �Vo o-. EX. _ U i (IN FEET - �_ e •. • / o �A\ ♦ '---J L---" v / • TQ� 87\ PIPE ohs s,o B � � • . � i y > 1008 904.10 / 13.0 i2.0 �b5� rn �� ��, / A'• \ •V• • A - I a PIPE / •�. �� woe / `ti�9� �\ `� v��v `� �(\ f �� �v �• / / / / ��I \I �, I Ii �� \ I\ ✓,� ✓,.• /--� '�� \ 9,0� ••' • - T � � / � � col ,� A � � v � �� v � 1 ss � d I ' -'-- 1 �I I / �g06 ,y .b-oy5• \ �� I 9os LOW AREA' • v v / � / _ _ _ o, � � v � \ � � , 2 / �-- rn - � �� ----- / I .•E+. a , .°:. ...�' CRITICAL HWL 906.2 / F-- V 5v T�C�AL H�905. �(SNOWMELT) (II• �v J �, - - _�v /_- J I, ' - \ A(SNOTELT)� II • • • oa � / - -_ I I ,i i � v _� �-',i-�� •��� � / \ l / /i l ; I I I \ A A A � i •. v vv � � � ••••'••.off - t _ I � I � ape � L--' � /' � �� FLOODPLAIN SUMMARY �• / Tn NO ASSUMED FLOODPLAIN WITHIN ..J /-- ���` / '�.� �� I - I /---- •. NWL 901.8 \ �. 10.. = J L - 9 0 -/ \ \ \\/ / \ / / -/ I 100 YR HWL = 903.8 THE SITE BOUNDARY. �� °Fh� �/ 1 f ,1 °----- .. '•�•' ----\� `\\ / ` �y ; - ` 10 = o • / -/- I DAY SNOWMELT 9 4. \ i A - • • ..:°:. ... ��v / �� v / / /- (PER RCWD MODEL) ' \ °Fj 1 �• - Xa` \woo % �v l mw • V / v� IIIL-LI 'yo O TL N 15 / 1 \ \� WETLAND D f \ CRITICAL HWL - 904. \ \` (SNOWMELT) WETLAND 25-A NO FLOODPLAIN STORAGE / CRITICAL HWL = 905.5 WITHIN SITE BOUNDARY \ / t EOF �(SNOWMELT) � �� ' t \\\v AAV�°u ��v�V�• - _ _ \ - - / \ , 1 WETLAND 50 ) I V � I t �\-- \ CRITICAL HWL = 904.7 (SNOWMELT) \ �t•' I � / 8r \ / Q � � I 100 YR HWL = 903.8 \ --10 DAY SNOWMELT = 904.2 (PER RCWD _MODEL) 1 01 -wr-ew = g - - - - - - / �9E#PFIEASANTi13NE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC F1 CARLSON I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Drawn: KRO 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments ENi INEEi� N SUITE i� or report was prepared by me or under my � NATURES REFUGE NORTH iBLAMNE� MN 7s44 su�rvEYING TEL�. direct supervision and that am a duly Signature: � //� , ^� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT of ENGINEERING PLANNIN6 Fax 7W. Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 CAW-WN-ENGlNEEt?INGWNF the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03-floodplain exhibit.dwg 1- A 4 -, 7t J`71 G-I. LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE BITUMINOUS [ ] CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER > STORM SEWER - >>- >> WATER MAIN ---- DENOTES INLET PROTECTION OVERHEAD UTILITY ohe STORM CATCH BASIN 1 1 1 1 STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT HYD MH 1�__? Gv GATE VALVE N ry TELEVISION BOX L Te TELEPHONE BOX UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR - 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN FP WETLAND LINE - - USACE WETLAND LINE - - - - - - CC.0 00.0 SPOT ELEVATION �_3- -- X E_- X � E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW x 000.0 SILT FENCE • • • • • • - TREE FENCE ®0000000 - GRADING LIMITS TREELINE SOIL BORING TP FEMA FLOODPLAIN FP RCWD FLOODPLAIN fp fp • SPECIFICATIONS: PROTECTED OPEN SPACE AREA I MONUMENT Heyond this marker is a protuctcd wen of \ CONSISTS OF A POST AND A PROTECTED OPEN SPACE SIGN n%otuce management 11e:uures and nanind prmtnd cover abutting a wMervourw. weilund or r 1 ` open . c. Pcdrtul Statc and local laws r n u� • WETLAND BUFFER SIGNS prohibit avi es thatcould dt turh iliti nalu ril u auand adjoining w tet hudi�h A o Y alterations such as dumping, tilling, plowing.. MOUNTED FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF THE POST FASTENED WITH lowing and yard waste disposal am prohibited NON -REMOVABLE SCREWS OR RIVETS SIZE: 5.5" H x 3.75" W ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY. GAUGE "+ SHALL BE 0.080 SIT nr LINES I SIGN COLOR COLOR SHALL BE GREEN AND BLUE LETTERS ON It •:nu luau ryucfUnu<nn IILpn44qm nl Iln+o,cn onJ 11» r. Icr r•.m 1•I.•oaclU I I .dl1anl r . In,•al.•1»,pu m I> to A WHITE BACKGROUND. ni Ins 1 I oy±-_ u11 POST MATERIALS 4" X 4" SQUARE TREATED WOOD OR OTHER CITY APPROVED MATERIAL POST INSTALLATION MOUNTED TO A HEIGHT OF FOUR FEET ABOVE GRADE SET AT LEAST 42 INCHES IN THE GROUND INSTALLED AT EACH LOT LINE WHERE IT CROSSES A WETLAND BUFFER WITH A MAXIMUM 4 X 4 TFEAT® F'OBT SPACING OF 300 FEET BETWEEN SIGNS ( IF NO BUFFER IS REQUIRED THE MONUMENT SHALL BE AT THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND). PLACE ADDITIONAL POSTS AS NECESSARY TO FOLLOW BUFFER CONTOUR LINE I- J DIGITAL COPY OF SIGN AVAILABLE FROM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WETLAND BUFFER SIGN JANUARY, 2024 J, Cl T Y' O F GEN-22 LNCKES ... ........ ....... ... .............. I.............. I... ............. ............. .. %%*.%%%* ........ ....... WMC WETL ND BUFFER ,8FEXISTING WMC 28 �5 S.. PRP. l WETLAND BUFFER ••9 I / O 90 - � � \ 27 27 S.F. REQ. � s � s ( ) _ . o I -0 - - WMC WETLAND BUFFER \ / 11 677 PRP. -s 0 4 � 0 - � 4 ] o -.'. - \ - 11 63 S. RE - Q. u \ D .:I - 4 - .......... ..............: ... ........... 9 .......... ................+. ter'' '. ............ $ �, \ 8 ............ � N ...y. I ° .•. .•. •. •.•ter .rr r r • r r r r r r r ••r, •, • r r r r r r r r r r r r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr ^ � rrrrrrr \ ................... .... -I'- - \ %..................................... - _ o _. _. - / wETLA D 5 \ - , \ 00 - 9 CR ICAL HV�L -� 05.0 '�. . e-c I I I I \. - ........... ..rr. I 1,= \\ NOWMEL "' I _ o ::: ' :::•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. '.....: I ..... ` ............ I I -- � 890 o r..119 I r9 s --- I - ......................: .......... II - - 6 � ---- --- \ 90 - \ o < - / 9 ... .. .. .. ... ..... / • 1.-� ��y. I 0 I 9140 'I V � 880 --- � ••',.......... , .. \ \ may.. �:.. / •�-' \.. o 9 ®/ V p 10 FO T M CITY -lb 0 - 6 \ !A( WETLAND BUFFER < 0, -<- - - !/ s \ a q.. W T�A UFFER I a ' - :::.. 35�3 S.F. PRP. :� �..... ,,•..• • , � WETLAND 30 !':•'•• _ � e� c \\ - I \ I 4 :::::: ' ON WMC - \ o I TREE ° o 'dRITICAL HwL - 906-0 1; :' \ F �o 9 8 S.F. PRP. � SNOVVMELT r 1 -- a f I 9 � I - o a �J \ 41 S.F. RE - 7 \ Q. - ....................... l , MCvW��L ND IiFF Rv v �i \ - a 9 � � I I I'.• O6 \ 32,222 PR \� �\ \ : • .-.� �,/ h \�90\ \ V 00 p'• ''''''• ''' / J o - SB 2 0b o - y \ o Y a / I 9 o J J s� I - I c� I 9 m T� O� 9 o - � I 9 O O O I J s s \ �CITY4 �m r 0 00� �TN + T�P ofI I o a \ \ 9 v s I I C B i O b\° I I a p WETLAND B F ER - / T 3 \ i' o - op a 00 - - 9 9 � \ N0 0 \ -W - f ° - LAKE 300 9 - � a I m �r - N - - 7 l \ - I m -rz < _ I 9.7 77 SF RRP. N L 902 0 \ � a - I � I 1 9 d � I \O O J \ 5 � 0\S. F. / I \ s s7 R'F WETLAND 35 L I / 1- , I' 1 � "r � \ \ RITICAL HWL 906.1 O s • �av�oo p \ I - WETLAND FILL \ \ \ \ (SNOWMELT) �I U) rs � - - � o% NWL 905.0 \ \ \ `9 \ \\ L�� \ - °� 11,565 SF - - - 4 ^� a �� 1 , e o � n CRITICAL HWL = 906.6\ eoA \ • WETLAND 55� �� WETT AND\ FILL\ \ o O s \ a \ (•; SNOWMELT) \ \ _ - - P / � •' S.3 B -90 oaR ICAL HWL = 904 r:; _ - - - \ ":�:\ �� r 1- 9 O / / 9 oE° o 0°40 /t / \\ / i Q 4. (100 YR) \ EOF - BE (i \ '. - 1 09.0&04- �- \ I o x0 \ / > 9p2 • Vic, S I J ::. \ / / EXISTING WMC 1 WETLAND BUFFER .. ---------- -J / o \\ 9 / __t_. T °h° - � � `00 \� �, �/ ; - -. " ��_,�.;, o�o� �\ 1�/ / �`�6 / � \�� op \ \ \\\ 'oo \ � r� ,. i ., � � � � / / 1 ��I'J \ �-------- �06, 06.0 / /1 9 8.0 .•/ � 10.4 i / npch SOG G r. 914.3 I G \ \ 9 ° \ \ 9 \ \ w vO // �/ \y/ ^ 06 \ �} r OS 5) .I / '.'.'.'.'''''''•''� `V V \ - o. 1 / o R - -J - o 12 ��V 9 \ g13. I tl °j3z V \ �' S / A V A \ V A 1 /;•� //� o //c (9�og / I 1 �� 916.01 ° / 916 0 •,• 14 goy so% 913 1!� o�`90°04 0 x, a \ �"���. r` S /�/ I \ \ "'I - i �/ / � / / / / 9j?� \ � - -1 J ' L� / - � /`Y/�'I'•�� 14. is 1'�,- , /IPV// I \ 6- f�N p )EO 7 G 0 _ - " / \ - // ma`s ,�;•:•:•: � / c � M- Ski \ VPIPE o � �/ % ��� \ I a 913.o WETLAND L v o - 9 �1008 / x. z I p - �912� o q 9p\ / / c ha, 0 97> - r g1 .ol G I /.............. \X I I 32,540, / i �P s+ ,- �/ \10 0� < // S/ / - 1 1 I h W _9oa \ w 4,00 j� s /� .) \ I I V.) k G I slo .� \LOW AREA - \ / \ - �r � ... :•:• / / 1 1 - ' 1 \ \ 5 \ �... so - - I I I J ............................ . 1 \ . c SNO MEL � I I � / "•• •••'• .... ........ ........o ..... .............. o rn .I 11 �, I K I I \ ........ '•.Y WETLAND FILL PROTECTED OPEN AREA SPACE 13,847SF '•1- I 8c WMC EXISTING WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER SIGN y \ \\ WETLABUFFER \ j•;•;•:':•;• WMC WETLAND BUFFER ,> ... r r . . ' '� 70,b S.F. PRP. n 907.0 _ _ / \ \ \ \ y .. \`� 9 SB 1 - l: ':: 69 58 S. RE \' \ a . \:.:,:,:.:':;`''::;:;:::' . \ \\ WETLAND 15 I I :•:°:•:•:•••••:/:r:.............:..r..•.:..r..• • \ \\ •:1 CRITICAL HWL - 904 7 Beyond this marker is a protected area of resource management features and natural ground cover abutting a watercourse, wetland or open space. Federal, State and local laws prohibit activities that could disturb this natural area and adjoining water bodies. Any alterations such as dumping, tilling, plowing, mowing and yard waste disposal are prohibited. --v CITY OF RNOL KES If you have questions on the protection of this area and the adjacent water resource areas, please contact City Hall at (651) 982-2400. / WLILAND 2�D i.......:•.:•:•: \\\ \\ ......''� CRITICAL HWL = 905.5 1::.'................... ::'>/�'::.:::\\ osi� (SNOWMELT) m o r / + o � WMC WETLAND BUFFER 19,529 S.F. PRP. � I 4� I ,S.F. .\ WETLAND SUMMARY \ `n PLACE SIGN ON A WETLAND FILL = 84,479 SF (1.94 AC) 4"X4" TREATED WOOD WMC WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 197,699 SF (4.54 AC) POST WITH SIGN A REQUIRED WMC WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 18 4,3 01 S.F. (4.23 AC) MINIMUM OF 4' ABOVE CITY WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 21,895 SF (0.50 AC) GRADE REQUIRED CITY WETLAND BUFFER AREA = 11,311 S.F. (0.26 AC) • COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR SIGN LAYOUT AND PRINTING. DENOTES OPEN SPACE AREA / WETLAND SIGN WMC BUFFER WIDTH: AVERAGE WIDTH 50' (ft) *MINIMUM WIDTH 25' (ft) (NOTE: ALL AREAS EXCLUDE PAVED TRAIL SURFACES) * UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CITY BUFFER WIDTH: 10' (ft) (NO AVERAGING) � I \\\ \\\ 1 - � / � 1 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG torn 0 Q Know what's below. Call before you dig. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level was determined according to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." / I z 0 50 100 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 - Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 - Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) PFIE,45ANTII3NE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC W1 CARLSON I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Drawn: KRO 1. 4/25/25 Per City &Watershed Comments ENisINEEi� N s>tLAI ia� or report was prepared by me or under my � NATURES REFUGE NORTH WETLAND BUFFER IBLAINE� MNs44 suRVEYING TEL7W. direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: � //�� Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive, # 100 of ENGINEERING PLANNING Fax 7W. Licensed Professional Engineer under Lino Lakes, Minnesota EXHIBIT 1 CA►i I-WN-ENSINEE IN NF the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 3/4/25 License #: 25063 Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Save Date: 04 25 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\5412-03_wetland buffer ex.dwg A 4 -M J`t1G-V• Attachment 3. Land Use Plan NATURES REFUGE NIORTH LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ARF'i- 6 � S AGR 1 FC;FND 0 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 0 LAKE/BORROW AREA (NWL) 0 STORM PONDS STTF DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±59.30 AC. TOTAL ROW AREA f5.59 AC. WATER AREA ±10.94 AC. ANDALL STREET WETLANDS (REMAINING) f5.31 AC. FRONT 25 OR ------- _ -T 0 WETLANDS (REMAIN;ING) LAKE/BORROW AREA (NWL) f4.02 AC. SIDE STORM PONDS f1.61 AC. SIDE CORNER 20 or w SINGLE FAMILY LO IS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE f22.97 AC. II I I I I I i OUTLOT B I I G 3 OUTLOT D TOTAL LOT AREA f19.80 AC. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS/UNITS 93 MINIMUM HOUSE SETBACK DATA: 30 FT.* 7.5 FT. 25 FT.* REAR SETBACK 30 FT. *30 FT. FRONT SETBACK FOR LOTS 25-36 BLOCK 4 & LOTS 1-12 BLOCK 5 o �P 0 0 MAIN STREET (CSAH 14) Lo < Q� Q LJ W Q Q U7 = v Z � 5 LILAC ST. N APOLLO DR. NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) SOIL BORINGS HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 2825 CEDAR AVE. S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 (612)729-2959 WETLANDS KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 26105 WILD ROSE LANE SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 (952)401-8757 OWNER CONTACT M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC. 5354 PARKDALE DRIVE #100 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (763)586-7200 0 50 100 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 1. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2011 — Elevation 894.88 ft. (NAVD88) 2. Anoka County Benchmark No. 2012 — Elevation 911.80 ft. (NAVD88) NTRIEDRNE Revisions: M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC 1 CARLSON ENGINEERING;SUITE100 Drawn: ADB , �AINE�MN�449 NATURES REFUGE NORTH swrvEYIN Designed: BJK 5354 Parkdale Drive #100 LAND USE PLAN of TEL753.4M73 ENGINEERING PLANNINS FAXWMA89.7 CLino Lakes, Minnesota NNN I LS0N-EN61NEEMNrmC0M Date: 3/4/25 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 1 Save Date: 03 13 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 -natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\exhibits\5412-03_land use.dwg # 5412-03 Attachment 4. Phasing Plan ug � ug — J L _D r — I AI � I T I / 1 n I — - I - r I � -) I^� r- , r- LJ 1 \ i 1 j \ \ PROP — \ 57 LIFT TATION I I I 1 I I \ \ v 56 58 59 �0 11 61 / / T11 t i\ \ I \ 55 _� L__� L_ L�i�� \ �� N v� 63 STREET B / 54 I v r N vv OUTLOT D �� �//- - y - _ , / �\ \ 64_ - D \vv Z- 53 L-_ -_ / / 74 _--- y111 P°N </, V vv J 65 I 4 \ 76 9 \ / 52 L_ / /-_-_-_--- u-__ -� II L 51 ?2 Y\ —�—I L, / ` OUTLOT A \ \ I 50 I Li — - -71 � 79 68 PR—OPO—SED TRAIL L�� 49 i 70 80/48 81 / / I OND I/ / // �/'` / P , \ \ 1 35 I 36 34 J11 ` / 1,�37 47 � 82 mJ 38 T// // 83////// / /�\ �84�-�. I 30 131 I I 32i\� EET p`% \�� 3 /i %� </ �i� L—JL 11 $5/// 45 �. ` // 86 40///87 93 91 \ I I 1////�// /2��/i\ ✓ U41, r�/i �/�//j1 49 488i II1I II 190 24 II 123 89,1I II I I ,II N P13 42 /12 �F 26 43 �� L 1028 29 // \ 20 g \`9 \\ ` �` \ < / 8 /�/ 2 5 II 4 I\ I 19 15 18 11 17 1116 �� >�� \ 1/ \; \�\ LL--JI�--�\- / SUMMARY OUTLOT C - -i I- v , PHASE I TOTAL: 62 LOTS OUT�OT B / PHASE II TOTAL: 31 LOTS w ,' / '- �_-�_v \ �g �� SITE TOTAL: 93 LOTS LL \ \ NOTE: 1.) THE ENTIRE SITE WILL BE - \ I GRADED IN ONE PHASE. \ / LL STREET AND \ / \ z 0 50 100 200 ( SCALE IN FEET ) i PHEASANT RII3GE DR NE CARLSONSURVEYING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING PLANNING SUITE 100 BLAINE, MN 5544:IE TEL76MASM7 FAX 76'FA .7 CARLSON-ENIMNEERIN€AN M Save Date: 03 04 25 f:\jobs\5401 - 5420\5412-03 - natures refuge north\cad c3d\engineering\exhibits\5412.03 phasing exhibit.dwg Drawn: JJO Designed: Date: 3/4/25 Revisions: 1. M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, #100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 NATURES REFUGE NORTH Lino Lakes, Minnesota PHASING PLAN Attachment 5. Ghost Plat O 12 OUTLOT BAP.—.' 13 OUTLOT B FLITURE STRET B 6 O.L E --------------------------- 10 2; -- - --------- G -------- - --------- 9 ------ - ---- ------ -------------- I ------------ 8 4 - -------------- --------- ------ 2 5 --------- ---- --------------- M---------------------- ----------------------- 1 3 > 4 -- ----------- ---- ------- -------- ------ 4 2 > 7 6 --- - -- -------- ---------- 10 -------------------- i F9 --------------------- rri ---- ------ ----------------- "j 4 i > -------------------------- ----------- - --------------- -- ------ 11 ------- . .............. .. ----- --------- -- - ----- ---- I . , 13 ......... 1, 3 5 12 4 2 10 OUTLOT A 2 L ---------------- ------------ C --- ks X 20 - ------------ 1 --------------------- - 22 18 WL ------------------------ 23 ------------------------ L------------------------ 24 ------------------------ \ ---------------- ------------ -- --------- I ---------------------- 2 25 16 ----------------------- ----------------------- 3 12 10 -------------- " ' 7 4 STREET D \ ----------- ----- --- 5 10 6 9 8 7 29 ZY 7 --- -- -------- OUTLOT C ------- — ----- ---------- 30 6 OUTLOT A ----------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- j ---------------------- 1 31 5 I -------------------------- ----------------------- -----------------I ------------------------- 4 32 -5- - ---- ----------- \ ------- ---- - ------ 33 0 ----------- ----- -- ---- ---- --- ----- 34 -- ------- ---------- ----- ---------- 35 ------------------------- OUTLOT B OUTLOT D 5 ---------------------------------- O 4 3 wMC wMC SAVED OUTLOT C wMC wMC wMC 7 0 U 0 z W m 0 Lo 00 00 Lo Ln Ln z D a a z z a CO 0 W W W Of co W 00 WSI� Memorandum To: Eric Zweber, WSB Cc: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 4, 2025 Re: Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat - Engineering Review 023898-000 WSB's review of the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Natures Refuge North development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by Carlson McCain and received March 10 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Natures Refuge North Preliminary Plat Submittal prepared by Carlson McCain, dated March 4, 2025. • Natures Refuge North Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Carlson McCain, dated March 4, 2025. • Natures Refuge North Traffic Impact Study prepared by S2Traffic Solutions, dated March 28, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Responses Carlson Engineering 4/25/2025 • General The Natures Refuge North Addition is the second phase of the overall Natures Refuge development which includes 60 acres north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of CSAH 23 (Lake Street) and east of Wood Duck Trail. The project proposes 92 villa lots and associated infrastructure. This property was originally part of a larger development of which an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared. The evaluation concluded that the project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects. • Grading The Natures Refuge North Addition includes site grading for the 92 units as well as extensions of Haywood Drive and three local streets that are yet to be named. Comments: 1. Show EOF elevations , locations, and routes for all low points in the paved and green spaces. EOF's have been added to all low points and ponds. a. EOF elevations must meet minimum freeboard requirements with building lowest opening elevations (LOEs) EOF's elevation have been verified to meet freeboard requirements. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 2 • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Natures Refuge North Addition consists of storm sewer draining streets and yards, two sedimentation basins, and a large basin excavated for fill material. The stormwater systems shall meet the City's and Rice Creek Watershed District's (RCWD) Stormwater Management requirements. All proposed future public streets must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Needed if basins Existing 0.27 1.25 9.48 landlocked Needed if basins Proposed 0.68 2.85 12.81 landlocked Comments: 1. Outflow rates increase for all modeled storm events beyond what can be attributed to model accuracy. Further attempts at providing rate control must be made. For example, ditching flows from back yards to the inlets routing to BMPs, lowering the FES north of Wetland 50 to better route flows into Pond 500, or small rate -control basins at areas that cannot reasonably be routed into a BMP. a. If increases cannot be avoided, it must be demonstrated that they will not cause an adverse downstream impact. Flows have been adjusted and plans modified. 2. The SWMP water quality calculations show 0.90 acres of existing impervious, however the HydroCAD existing modeling has 3.57 acres of unconnected roof land cover. Please clarify these differences. Existing impervious adjusted within water quality calculations. 3. Please revise the Water Quality calculations in the SWMP as they do not match HydroCAD modeling. For instance, HydroCAD modeling shows 16.86 total acres and 7.52 acres of impervious routed to Pond 600, but the SWMP has a total area of 9.77 acres and 0.196 acres of impervious. Water quality calculation updated. 4. NURP criteria specify a maximum depth of 10'. Pond 500 has a depth of 11', raising the bottom elevation to 10' will bring it into NURP compliance and still keep the majority of its dead volume. Pond 500 has been revised to a depth of 10' 5. Per new RCWD standards, any new impervious flowing to a pond designed in accordance with NURP criteria counts as full water quality treatment, therefore the full volume credit can be claimed for new impervious flowing to Pond 500 and 600 if properly designed. Water quality revised. 6. Pond 300 should be renamed to Lake 300 as its depth is well in excess of the 10' max depth outlined in NURP criteria. Additionally, it cannot be counted asproviding water quality treatment. Note has been revised. 7. Please clarify why drainage area 26S is modeled. It is offsite and has no changefrom existing to proposed conditions. 26S was modeled assuming the Street B connection to Andall may occur. We are assuming the new street will have ribbon curb and there will be no drainage increase to 26 (for now) 8. The 2.5" event should be modeled in HydroCAD to determine runoff volumes needed for pond dead storage. Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 3 The 2.5" event is calculated within our pond spreadsheet which gives us our required dead storage through calculations within this spreadsheet. 9. As many wetlands receiving runoff are Type 1, they are classified as highly susceptible and therefore must have no increase in bounce or inundation periodfor the 2- and 10-year events. Kjolhaug environmental reviewed the wetland susceptibility and all wetlands were adjusted. No wetlands are considered highly susceptible. 10. Detailed storm sewer plans, profiles, and calculations will be needed in future submittals. This should include all utility crossings to confirm constructability and any need for insulation. It should also include structure type and sizing to confirm constructability with pipe alignments. It is likely that more storm sewer design comments will be generated at that time. The plan and profiles will be provided with final plans. Design spreadsheet and structure map provided until final plans are made. a. The pipe run from FES to 503 as shown has a velocity under the minimum of 3 ft/s. FES removed as it does not provide a benefit. No surface water can be directed towards pond 500 in this location. 11. All proposed storm sewer serving public roads must be a minimum 15" diameterand consist of RCP. Noted. 12. Inlet spread and run calculations, especially at sag points, will be needed toconfirm public roads are designed in accordance with City standards of maintaining an 8' drivable lane during the 3-year storm event. Spread calcs added — based on 3-year event. 13. Erosion control blankets must be shown on slopes 4:1 and steeper, such as around proposed basins. Erosion control blanket added where necessary. • Water Supply The development will include a water system with 8 to 16 inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot. Comments: 1. Connect to existing 16" DIP Watermain Note added 2. Identify on all plans coordinating with utility (gas) provider for utility installation, grading, and street construction Note added. 3. Verify potential conflicts at all utility crossings a. Maintain minimum 18" separation from watermain/services Watermain will be adjusted (lowered) as needed to maintain separation from service crossings. This will be determined with final plans. b. Insulate when separation between storm sewer and watermain orforcemain is less than 36" Noted. To be shown on final plans. 4. Provide barricades to protect the temporary hydrant at the ends of Street A and Street C Barricades added and called out on site plan. 5. Add a gate valve to the western leg of the Street C/D tee Valve added 6. Extend watermain and hydrant with Street B to Andall Street with this development Street added and grading as been adjusted. • Sanitary Sewer Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 4 The site will be served by 8- inch diameter main along with 4-inch Schedule 40 PVC service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the north, and east. A lift station is proposed to serve the development and future sewer districts to the east in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Comments: 1. Connect to existing 10" PVC SDR 35 sanitary sewer main a. Match existing slope Note added. Existing invert and slope based on proposed stub elevation from Natures Refuge. 2. [Lift Station] a. The lift station can be raised by 2 feet. Per discussion, the lift station was raised 4-feet. b. Projected peak hourly flow from 228 residential units is about 120 gpm, so8" sewers shown are sufficient. Noted. i. Forcemain will be 4". Noted. c. Deep 35' build at the lift station, but looks like it's needed to servethe northeast corner by gravity. Noted. i. Looks like about 50' radius around wet well for excavation during construction, hopefully enough unless Geotech requires shallower embankment. Noted. Assuming sandy soils — 1:1 minimum will be needed. Easement does cover a 50' radius from the center of lift station. Future maintenance should be covered. Sheet piling or trench box should cover any embankment issues along the street side if for some reason the lift station needed to be repaired. d. Can the 12' build at the northwest corner serve the street extending north outside the service area if desired? No. Currently it does not. Please advise if this sanitary line needs to service the area to the north. Insulate all sewer with less than T cover a. Consider lowering the watermain to limit conflicts between services and mains Watermain will be lowered as -needed for service conflicts — this will be shown with final plans. Transportation The proposed development will have a primary access from Haywood and Glenwood Drives. Which is the shortest route out the proposed neighborhood. The City also requires a connection to Andall St. to the existing Arena Acers Development.The City has an existing right of way to provide access to the easterly property. Per the traffic study the connection to Andall St will receive minimal traffic, however it will provide connectivity for public safety and the neighborhoods it serves. This connection is in conformance with the City's Ordinances for adjoining adjacent subdivision for reasonable circulation of traffic. The City of Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan requires neighborhood street connections for reduced travel times and linking neighborhoods together. The City's Engineering and Public Safety departments submit that the roadway connection to Andall Street shall be constructed as detailed below. Trails and sidewalks Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 5 A trail is proposed extending from the south end of the development at the connection with Natures Refuge, to the north end of the development and branching west to one of the new streets. Reference the City Planner's report for trail and sidewalk detail. Comments: 1. There is little to no significant impact on the adjacent streets and intersections dueto the trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. Noted. There is no difference in operations with or without the Andall Street access. The benefits of connecting the development to Andall Street are: a) Improving Fire and Life Safety response to both neighborhoods (providing additional means of access). b) Connectivity of neighborhoods which generally results in a reduction of overall vehicle miles traveled. c) Provides access for the existing neighborhood to sidewalks and trail system. Also, can provide a safer route to/from the school with almost no need to walk/bike on CSAH 14. Noted. Street added. 3. It may be beneficial to look into providing a trail extension from the school to Basswood to provide a non -motorized connection to the school completely independent from CSAH 14. Noted. 4. The CSAH 14/Wood Duck intersection is expected to operate acceptably during full - build scenarios. In the future the City should consider working with Anoka County to providing exclusive left -turn lanes on CSAH 14. Noted. 5. Andall Street should be constructed as a 24 foot wide roadway within the cleared path from the watermain / fire hydrant extension to the Arena Acres Development. The City will consider a sidewalk on one side of the roadway during the final plat review. It is anticipated that approximately 15 trees will be removed with the construction of the watermain and roadway. There will also be wetland impacts that will need to be mitigated. Street has been adjusted. 6. Provide a striped crosswalk at the east end of Street C instead of having thetrail cross the road Trail adjusted. Markings to be provided with final plans a. Provide pedestrian crossing and advanced pedestrian crossing signs Pedestrian crossing will be shown with final plans. b. Provide pedestrian ramps Trail adjusted in order for pedestrian ramps to be installed c. Realign trail to cross Street C at a perpendicular angle Revised. 7. Provide barricades to protect the temporary hydrant Barricades added and called out on site plan. 8. Provide a separate trail easement for the public trail crossing Outlot D This will be provided with final plans — once trail is built 9. Provide road profiles meeting 30 MPH horizontal and vertical design curves Speed limit reduction signs will be provided in lieu of meeting 30 MPH horizontal and Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 6 vertical curves. These will be provided with final plans. • Wetlands and Environment The project proposes approximately 1.62 acres of wetland impact. A wetland replacement plan will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through RCWD and the City. The current WCA NOD document states they are avoiding impacts to wetland 8 however, wetland 8 will be impacted with the connection to Andall Street and should be included with the impacts. Review of the MnDNR's Natural Heritage Information System database indicates the potential presence of several protected species within and near the project area, including protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for additional studies or surveys. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. Any disturbed buffer areas should be seeded with a seed mix containing native, non-invasive, species. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Natures Refuge North Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City's Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The Natures Refuge North Addition does not impact the existing floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features. Comments: 1. More detailed storm sewer plans must be submitted to sufficiently reviewrequired drainage and utility easements over pipes. a. This could potentially impact lot widths of existing parcels Design spreadsheet provided — storm depths verified easements verified. 2. Provide a separate trail easement for the public trail crossing Outlot D Trail easement will be provided after trail is constructed. • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/04/2025 Page 7 • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Natures Refuge North Addition will be covered under the City's Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Borrow areas / Lakes area will be maintained by the HOA. • Permits Required Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit To be acquired prior to grading — will be acquired with final plans 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction To be acquired with final plans 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be acquired with final plans 4. Minnesota Department of Health To be acquired with final plans 5. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit To be acquired prior to grading 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit 7. To be acquired prior to grading If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Nature Refuge North Addition Engineering Review Attachment7. EnvironmentalMemo i C I T Y Environmental Memo N KEG To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments— Natures Refuge North PPP PP 04/25/25 — Carlson Engineering Responses Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1. Coordinate with the Rare Plant Rescue group (contact Carrie Taylor at Anoka Conservation District) to allow for transport of any rare plants for which impact is unavoidable to a donor site, such as Wollan's Park Wetland Bank in Lino Lakes. Noted, this will be coordinated with developer. Show minimal plantings of oaks along the two stormwater ponds. These areas are to remain largely unplanted to encourage native plant species. A few oaks should be scattered around the basin to provide soil stabilization and screening. Revised landscape plan includes additional open space trees. 3. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger Stormwater ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse. Re -use system incorporated into site. b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed bythe MPCA Additional groundwater information provided. Page 1 c. Stormwater Pond 500 and 600 are shown to be collecting drainage from wetland overflows. Verify basins are sized to handle additional runoff Basins are modeled to include the drainage from wetlands. Note that the wetlands are modeled with both a flow into the pond as well as any existing overland flows. Credit is not given for drainage from the wetlands that is directed to the stormwater ponds Noted. 4. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27 Tree protection fence is not necessary as all areas outside of the grading limits will be protected by silt fence. 5. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. Noted. See comment above regarding silt fence. 6. Ash trees preserved will not provide any existing tree credit. All ash trees should be removed unless noted they are and will continue to be treated for EAB on two-year rotations Noted. All ash trees will be removed. 7. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site -specific mixes for each location. Currently showing wet ditch planting for Stormwater areas and tall grass roadside mix for buffer locations. Seed mixes are consistent with approved WMC Seeding and Maintenance Plan for Natures Refuge (south), and 2024 MnDOT Seeding Manual. Note as of 2024 MnDOT seed mixes are no longer numbered and have been updated / replaced with new mix designs designated by letter. 8. Low maintenance turf should be evaluated throughout the development. Ground covers should be drought resistant to reduce the need forirrigation use. Noted. 9. Add a note to the landscape plan to stockpile topsoil and preserve during the project. Topsoil should be spread over the open space and natural areas to promote the existing seed bank and encourage native plants. Noted, landscape specifications for Soil Preparation and Topsoil Material on sheet L4. Page 2 10. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. Noted, this will be provided. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 SWPPP provided b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals Noted. 11. Wetlands 30 and 35 are outside of the WMC buffer area. These wetlands appear to be outside of the area of disturbance. Staff recommends extending buffers around both wetlands as much as possible. Combining the buffer between the two wetlands would add the most protection and add additional wildlife benefits. Noted. 12. Confirm wetland outlets are above the HWL for the wetlands and will not affect hydrology during final design. Wetland bounce and inundation verified within the storm water management plan. 13. The Andall St connection should have the minimum width as derived from the traffic study and allowed by city ordinance to allow for emergency services and public street connection. Reduction of the road width will preserve wetlands and trees through the corridor. Noted. Street width adjusted to 24-feet back to back with ribbon curb. a. Trail connections should be provided along with water stubs for fire prevention. Sidewalk added 14. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations Noted. —to be coordinated with developer 15. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb is provided to allow turtles access off of the roads. Noted, turtle mitigation plan to be provided by developer. Surmountable curb installed where possible. 16. Submit the approved MN DNR Take Permit Noted, to be provided by Kjolhaug. Page 3 Responses 04/25/2025 Carlson Engineering RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting feedback from the Planning & Zoning Board: 1. Are there other Benefits Gained or Flexibility Provided? 2. Thoughts on requested PUD flexibility? a. If garage forward of house is acceptable, should there be a limit on how far? Additional Staff Comments: 1. Proposed open space areas should remain in the ownership of the HOA with a conservation easement granted to the City. Noted. This will be provided. 2. Since Outlot E meets the R-2 lot size requirements, Outlot E should be converted into Lot 11, Block 7. This lot is unbuildable until either parcel to the north develops, or a grading easement is provided. 3. A temporary turn around will be required at the north end of Street A. Turn around will be provided and shown on final plans. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Street B and Street D Sidewalk added to street B. Street D sidewalk to be verified — cul-de-sac 5. The trail corridor between Lot 4 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 and east of Lots 1-4 Block 4 shall be widened to 30 feet wide. Revised. 8. The portion Outlot D that is occupied by the lift station should be separated from Outlot D through the creation of a new outlot that would be dedicated to the City. Outlot added. 9. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands and greenway corridors. Easements and buffers will be provided per city & RCWD rules. 10. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30ft wide. Noted. A separate 30-foot easement will be provided. 11. Cash fee in lieu of land dedication in the amount of $329,000 minus the cost of trail construction. Noted. 12. Compliance with the City Engineer Memo dated April 4, 2025 Responses to city engineer comments attached. 13. Compliance with the Environmental Memo dated March 27, 2025 Responses to environmental comments attached. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Wilkinson Waters INTRODUCTION The applicant, Wilkinson Waters LLC, is proposing a master planned development located on North Oaks Company Inc. property south of County Road J/Ash Street/CSAH 32, west of Centerville Road/CSAH 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. The development contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 76 gross acres and consists of a mix of 340 unit residential housing types and commercial development. The proposed development is called Wilkinson Waters. Tentative Review Schedule: Complete Application Date: March 12, 2025 60-Day Deadline: May 11, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: March 26, 2025 Park Board Meeting: April 2, 2025 EDAC Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: April 9, 2025 and May 14, 2025 City Council Work Session: May 5, 2025 City Council Meeting: May 27, 2025 The Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires notice to affected jurisdictions. They have 60 days to review and comment. The 60 day deadline is May 17, 2025 so the City Council meeting date for consideration is May 27, 2025 The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025. Unfortunately, the notice was not mailed to all property owners within 600ft of the development boundary so a second hearing will be held on May 141n 1 One concern brought up during the April 9th meeting was vehicle headlights entering or exiting the underground parking lot shining into adjacent houses along Ash St. A five (5) ft tall privacy fence is proposed to be installed along the drive lanes to screen the headlights. Staff recommends the fence be 6ft tall and another fence be installed along the east side to benefit the house at 6102 Centerville Road. This staff report provides edits to the April 9, 2025 Planning & Zoning staff report. Changes are either narratively described or shown as strikethrough (deletions) or underline (additions). BACKGROUND The Land Use Application is for the following: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning • PUD Preliminary Plan • Preliminary Plat • Site & Building Plan Review This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Maps prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Ash Street Traffic Impact Study prepared by ISG dated October 14, 2024 • Wetland Replacement Plan prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services dated March 2, 2025 • Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Plan prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Stormwater Management Report prepared by ISG dated March 10, 2025 • Traffic Noise Analysis prepared by ESI Engineering dated March 11, 2025 • Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec dated February 11, 2025 • Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines and Statement of Intent received on March 10, 2025 ANALYSIS History In September 2015, North Oaks Company LLC submitted a PUD Concept Plan for Advisory Board and Council review. The concept plan included two (2) parcels totaling 46 gross acres. It consisted of a residential mix of single family homes, twin homes, and senior housing rentals K totaling 136-161 housing units. The proposed development did not meet density requirements and did not move forward. In August 2024, the current developer submitted a PUD Concept Plan for advisory board and council input for a 356 housing unit and commercial development. The concept plan did not meet density requirements and the plans were revised to the current submittal. Current Proposal Please see the attached applicant's Design Guidelines booklet for a detailed description of the project. Per the narrative, "The proposed land uses include 34,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) —three story 100 unit market rate multi -family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 40 townhome units, and one (1) —100 unit senior living facility. In addition to these land uses there will be a regional stormwater management system that will be integrated into the natural landscape North of Wilkinson Lake." Residential The following chart compares the August 2024 PUD Concept Plan with the proposed March 2025 PUD Preliminary Plan. The applicant is proposing the following mix and number of housing types: August 2024 March 2025 Concept PUD Plan Housing Type # Units # Units 20 40 4-plex Townhomes = (5 buildings) (10 buildings) 36 6-plex Townhomes = 0 (6 buildings) Market Rate Multi -Family = (2 buildings x 100 units) 200 200 Senior Living Multi -Family = 100 100 356 340 The residential development transitions from townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and CSAH 32 (Ash Street) to the apartments adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road). The senior living building is also near Wilkinson Lakes. Trails, sidewalks and stormwater ponds are included throughout the development. Commercial The applicant is proposing approximately 5 acres of commercial development in the southeast quadrant of the site adjacent to CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) and Wilkinson Lake Boulevard. Sheet C3-10 Overall Site Plan shows three (3) commercial building pads (5,488-18,012sf footprint). Phasing The development is proposed to be built out in 4 phases: the 2 multiple family buildings, the townhome buildings, senior building, and commercial. See attached Phasing Plan. Existing Conditions The predominant existing land use is agricultural. MLCCS classifications include cattail marsh, saturated altered/non-native dominated vegetation, grasslands, deciduous trees and agriculture. Soil types include hydric, predominantly hydric, predominately non-hydric and non-hydric. Wetlands and floodplain exist on the west portion of the site. Several utility easements bisect the site. Current site grades range from about 904 to 929 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and generally slopes down to the west to the wetland area. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use 2040 Future Direction Zoning Current Land Use Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Low Density Residential City of North Oaks City of North Oaks City of North Oaks (Waverly Gardens (Waverly Gardens (Waverly Gardens South Senior Living Senior Living Senior Living Community) Community) Community) R-X, Rural East Rural Residential Permanent Rural Executive West R, Rural Agriculture Medium Density Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4 The site contains 4 parcels totaling approximately 76 gross acres and has 3 land use designations: medium density, high density, and signature gateway. One parcel (PID# 34-31-22- 44-0008) will be re -guided from high density to signature gateway. See attached Existing Land Use Plan and Proposed Land Use Plan. Per the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the areas are not intended to be strict land use and density boundaries but should be considered somewhat flexible to accommodate development. The Met Council requires a formal comprehensive plan amendment to adjust the land use boundaries. The proposed amendment slightly increases the allowed number of housing units; however, the proposed development of 340 units falls within both ranges. Existing Comp Plan Proposed Comp Plan Range of Allowed # of Housing Units 234 to 404 252 to 467 The Comprehensive Plan Amendment was mailed on March 18, 2025 to affected jurisdictions for their review and comment. The 60 day comment period ends May 17, 2025. At the April 9, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, Board Member Guthmueller asked what the definition of Signature Gateway is. Page 3-10 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan states: "Signature Gateway This Land Use Plan identifies 73 acres for Signature Gateway development, which accounts for 0.5% of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). The Signature Gateway District is reserved for high visibility, high traffic corridors serving as an entrance to the Community. The district allows residential at a density of 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre with 15 units per acre allowed if the project meets the City's housing goals. The district allows for development of multiple complementary uses on a single site including a combination of higher density residential, commercial services, and employment opportunities. This district incoraorates DlanninR Darameters estimatinE the ratio of the residential and commercial mix. These ranges are flexible and may change based on a specific development proposal." Planning District #4 further details this areas Signature Gateway Area. Planning District #4 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is located in Planning District 4. The Comprehensive Plan states: 5 Land Use • A gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning guide was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. Financing is now needed to implement the plan. • Planning District 4 includes one area designated Signature Gateway Area (Centerville Road/County Road J). o This site is located at the intersection of two county roads, near an 1-35E interchange. The site is expected to develop as an extension of the multi -family and commercial development south of the municipal boundary in the City of North Oaks. Approximately 80 percent of the area is expected to accommodate residential development at 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre. The City Council may allow up to 15 units per acre for projects that meet specific city housing goals. It is important to note the 80120 percent residential/commercial mix is related only to the 45 acres of land guided for Signature Gateway (based on the proposed Comp Plan Amendment). These 45 acres could support 9 acres of commercial development (45 acres x 20% = 9 acres.) The proposed Wilkinson Waters development includes 5 acres of commercial which is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Infrastructure & Public Facilities • Recommended sanitary sewer improvements in this area are based on connecting to the White Bear Township sewer in Centerville Road. Local sewers will discharge to at least two lift stations which will pump by force main to the White Bear Township facility. • The White Bear Township trunk sewer, constructed in the late 1980's, has capacity to serve portions of North Oaks and Lino Lakes in addition to White Bear Township's needs. North Oaks, by written agreement with White Bear Township, has purchased the right to use some of this capacity. The agreement has been modified, and North Oaks has made additional payments to the township as North Oaks' service needs have increased. A review of the current utilization of this facility indicates that there is still capacity available to serve at least a portion of the projected development in District 4. However, no formal agreement exists between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township. It 1.1 is recommended that the city commence negotiations with White Bear Township to secure the right to discharge to this facility. Negotiations are in process to include both sanitary sewer and water supply. • Pursue a full interchange at 1-35E and County Road J (Ash Street). Ramsey County is finalizing design for the 1-35E and CR J (Ash St) Interchange with construction proposed for Summer of 2025. • Work with Anoka County and Ramsey County to ensure appropriate access management on County Road J (Ash Street). MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway and access management improvement plans and financing for the 1-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. Anoka County is designing the Ash Street (CSAH 32) and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) improvements with construction proposed for Summer of 2026. Density For this development, density requirements are regulated by both the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and City Chapter 1102: Shoreland Management Overlay. Where the requirements are more or less restrictive, the more restrictive standards shall apply. In this case, it appears the 2040 Comprehensive Plan density requirements are more restrictive and shall be applied. • 2040 Comprehensive Plan See attached Land Use and Density Plan. The following chart is a summary of the site's general housing unit range and density using Met Council's density formula assuming approval of the comprehensive plan amendment: 7 PID #34-31-22-43-0006 Southwest Parcel PID #34-31-22-44-0001 Northwest Parcel Middle Parcel PID#34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 New Signature Gateway Parcel Total Gross Area (acres) 15.21 15.13 0.00 45.55 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.21 12.06 0.00 9.41 36.68 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 3.07 0.00 0.81 3.88 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.12 4.12 Other (UPA Powerline Easement) 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 2.09 Other (Commercial) 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.90 4.90 Net Area (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.22 24.22 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Signature Gateway Signature Gateway Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 0 0 194 194 High 0 0 0 242 242 High + Signature Gateway -Max 15 0 0 0 363 363 Proposed # Housing Units 340 Gross Density (units/acre) 4.48 Net Density (units/acre) 14.04 The Signature Gateway district allows for up to 15 units per net acre if the project meets the City's housing goals. These goals are provided in the attachments. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 194 to 363 housing units. The proposed 340 housing units is within the allowed the density range. • Shoreland Management Overlay Ordinance City Code Section 1102.13(4) details Shoreland PUD density requirements. The preliminary range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 262 to 452 housing units. Lot Area Per Range of Total # Section Housing Units Residential Use Net Area (acres) Net Area (sf) 1102.13(4)(b) Allowed Townhomes 24.23 1,055,459 5,000 211 Apartment 24.23 1,055,459 2,900 364 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan density range is more restrictive and shall be applied. Growth Management Strategy H., Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City's Growth Management Strategy. The strategy works in conjunction with the City's utility staging plan. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5-year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2024, the City's average annual number of units is 123. This is less the allowed 230 unit annual allocation. With existing projects underway the project will be phased over multiple years to meet growth management requirements. Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per Medium Density and 2040 Comp Plan Signature Gateway Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in having the property developed. The property will be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development in order to implement the Signature Gateway land use and allow for multi -family development in the shoreland district, zoning flexibility and create a mixed used development. Shoreland District The subject property is located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. They are both classified as Natural Environment lakes. Multi- family apartments are only allowed in the shoreland district by PUD. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. These are detailed below and throughout this staff report. Impervious Surface Coverage Maximum allowed townhome impervious coverage is 35% and commercial/multi-family is 60%. Per Sheet AO-12, Land Use & Density Plan, the total aggregate impervious coverage is 24.6%, which is less than the minimum 35% allowed. Open space requirements At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. Per Sheet AO-12, Land Use & Density Plan, there are approximately 41 acres of public open space. This divided by the 76 acre total site equals 53% open space. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. City Code Section 1102.13 details additional Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. The purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be departed from to accomplish public value purposes. The proposed conventional zoning districts used for this project are R-4, High Density Residential for the townhomes and apartments and GB, General Business for the commercial. A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Residential Lot Size and Width The attached PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations Chart details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district and shoreland requirements. The chart also compares the proposed development to these guidelines. Overall, the senior living and apartments appear to meet minimum R-4, High Density lot size and width requirements as detailed on the chart. PUD flexibility is required for the townhome lot width and sizes. Setbacks The following chart compares the conventional R-4, High Density zoning ordinance and Shoreland requirements to the proposed setbacks. 10 Multifamily City Ordinance Proposed PUD Flexibility Apartments Requirement Setbacks Required? Street ROW Building = 40 ft 40+ ft (Arterial St- No Parking Lot = 15 ft 15+ ft Centerville Road) Street ROW Building = 40 ft 40+ ft (Arterial St- No Parking Lot = 15 ft 15+ ft Ash Street) Building = 30 ft 30+ ft Rear Lot Line No Parking Lot = 5 ft 5+ft Building = 20 ft 15 ft Side Lot Line Yes Parking Lot = 5ft 5 ft Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 750 ft No PUD flexibility is required for multifamily side lot line building setbacks. Townhomes City Ordinance Proposed PUD Flexibility Townhomes Requirement Setbacks Required? Street ROW (Arterial St- Building = 40 ft 40 ft No Ash Street) Street ROW (Local St- Building = 30 ft 30 ft No Wilkinson Way) 15 fta Yes Rear Lot Line Building = 30 ft 30 fta No Side Lot Line Building = 20 ft 10 ft Yes Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 430ft No 'The rear lot line setbacks of the townhomes east of Wilkinson Way are 15ft. The rear lot line setbacks of the townhomes west of Wilkinson Way meet the required 30ft. PUD flexibility is required for townhome rear and side lot line building setbacks. Senior Living Senior Living City Ordinance Proposed PUD Flexibility Requirement Setbacks Required? 11 Street ROW Building = 30 ft 30+ ft (Local St- Yes Parking Lot = 15 ft 10 ft Wilkinson way) Building = 30 ft 30+ ft Rear Lot Line No Parking Lot = 5 ft NA Building = 20 ft 20 ft Side Lot Line No Parking Lot = 5ft NA Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 440 ft No PUD flexibility is requested for senior living parking lot setbacks. Staff Comment: 1. Staff does not support this parking lot setback flexibility. Commercial City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district Development Standards. The development proposes to use the GB, General Business zoning district as guidelines. Per City Code Section 1007.132 GB, General Business, City Ordinance Proposed PUD Flexibility Commercial Requirement Setbacks Required? Street ROW Building = 40 ft 40 ft (Arterial St- No Parking Lot = 15 ft 40 ft Centerville Road) Street ROW Building = 30 ft 30 ft (Local St- No Parking Lot = 15 ft 15+ ft Wilkinson Way) Street ROW Building = 30 ft 30+ ft (Wilkinson Lake Blvd) Parking Lot = 10 ft 5+ft No Building = 10 ft 15 ft Side Lot Line No Parking Lot = 10ft 10+ ft Wilkinson Lake OHWL 150 ft 1,000 ft No PUD flexibility is not required for the commercial development. 12 Staff Comments: 1. The Site Plan in the Design Guidelines booklet shall clearly show the approved building and parking lot setbacks for the entire development. This will establish the baseline setbacks for all development. Yield Plan As required per City Code Section 1001.026(4), the applicant submitted the attached yield plan. The yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters. The submitted yield plan indicates 13 separate residential buildings with a total of 394 housing units and no commercial component. The proposed concept plan is 340 housing units. Site Plan Review This site plan review is applicable only to the two (2) multifamily buildings site. In general, performance standards are met. Site plan review for the commercial and senior living buildings will be completed in the future upon their construction. The multifamily lot contains two (2), 100 unit buildings, a clubhouse with amenities such as a swimming pool, walking paths, pavilions, pickleball courts, surface parking spaces, etc. Lot sizes and setbacks were discussed above. Refuse and recyclable material enclosures will be located inside the garage level. Outdoor lighting meets the photometric foot candle and pole height requirements. Parking spaces requirements are 2 rent-free spaces per unit. A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be within the building. The 200 units require 400 parking spaces. 191 surface parking spaces and 210 covered parking spaces are proposed for a total of 401 parking spaces. Ten spaces are ADA complaint. Parking space requirements are met. Building Design Requirements City Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential and commercial building design standard requirements. The R-4 residential zoning districts also provide addition requirements. 13 The Design Guideline booklet details architecture standards. The multi -family apartments, clubhouse, and townhomes use exterior materials of wood finish accents, stone, and stucco. The color palette is brown and tan. Exterior elevations and materials were not included for the future senior living building or commercial but we anticipate material color themes to extend throughout the development. The townhome units are 29ft wide with 600sf garage sizes. The booklet includes several renderings and data tables showing compliance with general building provisions and exterior material requirements. Staff Comments: 1. One multifamily dwelling requirement that is not met is, "Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective." 2. Staff recommends the townhomes include a stone base around all elevations. Per the Design Guidelines booklet, the applicant is requesting building design PUD flexibility for: 1. At multi- family buildings, the applicant will request the flexibility to be the greater of 4 stories or 55' from grade to mid -rake of slope roof or top of parapet of flat roof. City Code Section 1007.114(8) of the R-4 District allows for a maximum building height of the greater of 3 stories or 40ft. City Code Section 1102.07(2)(c) of the Shoreland District allows for a maximum building height of 36ft. Height is measured as the average height of the highest gable or a pitch or hipped roof. The multifamily apartments are 3 stories with a mid -rake or building height of 39ft. The senior living building is proposed 4 stories with a mid -rake or building height of 55ft. Staff Comments: 1. Staff has concerns regarding the proposed 4 stories, 55ft building height from grade to mid -rake. The concept plan proposed 4 stories with a mid -rake or building height of 48ft for the senior living building. 2. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi -family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code 1007.114 R-4(5). 14 City Code Section 1007.114(4) of the R-4 District requires the minimum livable floor area for each multiple family dwelling unit shall be 700 square feet plus 100 additional square feet for each bedroom. During concept plan review, there was general support for the 15% of the units being studio apartments. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of residential and commercial lots and blocks. Outlots would contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Lot or Outlot Purpose Ownership Lots 1-5, Block 1 Townhomes Private Lots 1-5, Block 2 Townhomes Private Lot 6, Block 2 2 multifamily buildings Private A Open space, wetlands, buffer, lake HOA B Open space, wetland buffer, stormwater ponds HOA C Trail corridor HOA D Future senior living building Private E Future commercial Private Staff Comments: 1. An outlot shall be created for the upland area of the public park to the west that will be used for passive recreation. The outlot will be owned by the City. Streets and Alleys CSAH 32 (Ash Street) and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) are A -Minor Arterial Expander roads. Internal streets consist of local streets and private driveways intended to serve the site. Wilkinson Way is a local street with 60ft of right-of-way and paved 30ft back to back. Sidewalk is provided along the east side of Wilkson Way. 15 MnDOT, Anoka County, Ramsey County, and adjacent communities have worked jointly on roadway improvement plans and financing for the 1-35E interchange and CSAH 32 and CSAH 21 intersections. These improvements are tentatively scheduled for 2025 and 2026. Road easements 33ft wide are being dedicated along Ash Street and Centerville Road. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide are provided along all lot lines. Staff Comments: 1. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management facilities. 2. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands, ditches, and greenway corridors. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The grading plans show four (4) rain gardens and one (1) stormwater management facility. A multi -purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, open space have been incorporated into the development. Per the WSB Engineering Memo dated April 2, 2025, stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Needed if basins Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 landlocked Currently Needed if basins 17.76 45.54 117.14 Proposed landlocked Utilities Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. 16 The site is located in Sanitary Sewer District (Sub -district 4A). Flows from this area will be conveyed to the southeast through the White Bear Township sanitary sewer system. The site is located in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). The two (2) easterly lots containing the residential and commercial development are within Utility Staging Area 1A. By resolution, the Council may move the two (2) other parcels from Stage 1B (2025- 2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025) but there is no development proposed in this area. The site is proposed to be served by White Bear Township's municipal water system. A joint powers agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township for sanitary sewer and water shall be completed prior to approval of the final plat. The site proposes a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. The system shall be evaluated and implemented to the extent it is feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. The attached WSB City Engineer memo details additional information. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan Per the March 26, 2025 Environmental Board staff report: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan does show areas of value for natural resource conservation related to wetlands on the site. The greenway system consists of a Natural Resource Conservation area running along the wetland and lake complex. Trails should be included along Centerville Road and Ash Street and be incorporated into the development along the wetland through the greenway corridor. This should be designed as a multifunction greenway corridor addressing water quality, passive recreation and wildlife habitat. Connectivity should be provided to the north, east, south, and west of the project site. The proposed trail should be looped and connect back in the new proposed road instead of dead ending in the wetland. Staff Comment: 1. A minimum 30-40ft wide pedestrian way/trail loop with minimum 8.5 ft wide trail shall be made from Centerville Road, along Wilkison Way, to the public open space and loop back to the Ash Street trail. This creates a multi -functional greenway corridor. 17 Tree Preservation and Landscaping Per the March 26, 2025 Environmental Board staff report: A tree survey was performed that identified: Total Trees Surveyed 196 Trees Removed 38 Significant Trees Removed 30 Basic Use Area Trees Preserved 158 Mitigation Trees Required There were 196 trees surveyed on the site. Tree species present include maple, cottonwood, whit spruce, crab apple, boxelder, pussy willow, aspen, oaks, red pine, and elm. There is a diversity of trees scattered throughout the site based on topography and past land uses. Future submittals should include a table of the species being removed referencing tag number to verify health, size, species, and location. Trees outside of the basic use area will be required to be mitigated. Additionally, all removals should state the management zone in which the tree resides. Non - ESA, Natural Resource Enhancement Area, and Natural Resource Conservation area. Based on the location mitigation requirements vary. It appears there are several trees outside of the basic use area and within the 30' buffer of the wetland. An updated mitigation plan will be required and evaluated with future submissions to confirm tree replacement and mitigation are being met. Trees that are planned for preservation will require tree protection fence installed in accordance with the City Tree Protection Fence detail. Include a list of species to be planted and number of each species to be planted. Current plans just show large, medium, and large tree totals and aren't broken down to species. Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards have not been met. Additional information required to verify mitigation requirements. Open Areas Landscape Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide general site beautification and high aesthetic quality with a mix of plant materials in open areas. Open area landscape standards call for 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 sf. W Required for 409,393 square feet of open space: 164 large trees 328 large shrubs Provided: 164 large trees 328 large shrubs Open Areas Landscape Standards have been met. Buffer and Screen Standards The purpose of this requirement is to separate and buffer different land use types, screen roads and parking, and screen utility and loading areas. Continuous, year-round planting screens require, at the minimum, a double row of plants with triangulated spacing. New trees may fulfill canopy coverage, foundation landscape, landscape screen, and open space standards simultaneously if applicable by location. Screening is being provided by a combination of large shrubs (6'), small shrubs (30"), and large tree plantings Buffer and Screen Standards have been met. Additional detail on exact species and locations will be required before final approval. Canopy Cover Canopy cover requirements are a minimum canopy cover of 40% for areas outside of single family and multi -family residential. The total hardscape coverage is 217,670X.04= 87,068 SF. The applicant is proposing to plant 182 trees for canopy coverage. Based on the location each size tree gets a SF credit associated with the planting. The applicant is showing a proposed 87,175 SF of coverage meeting the requirements. Foundation Landscaping Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development. It does apply to all other uses. 2 large trees and 6 large shrubs are required per 100 LF of building. Trees planted within 30' of the building shall be considered within the foundation landscape zone. Foundation landscaping is required at the front of the building and adjacent to public/private streets. 19 The proposed project has 8,000 linear feet of proposed building subject to the foundation landscape standards. Requirements of 160 large trees and 480 large shrubs are currently being provided. Standards for this section are being met. Sod and Ground Cover Standards All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to natural areas or wetlands. Native weed free seed mixes should be shown in stormwater and open space areas to mitigate for the removal of native vegetation with the development. Native vegetation will help establish deeper roots, limit erosion, reduction of irrigation, and provide pollinator habitat. Low maintenance turf grass should be proposed in order to conserve water throughout the site. Additionally native seed mixes should be proposed to create habitat and reduce strain on the water supply system. Plantings adjacent to the buildings should also be drought tolerant to reduce the need for irrigation. If irrigation is not being proposed through reuse native species should be planted where feasible. Environmental Review Record An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed. On February 10, 2025, the City Council passed Resolution No. 25-12 approving the Record of Decision and Making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the North Oaks Mixed Use Development. Wetlands Per the March 3, 2025 Wetland Replacement Plan, there are three (3) wetlands on the site. Wetland Name Area Management Class Base Buffer Width Min Buffer Width Wetland 1 7.95 acres Manage 2 30 ft 24 ft 20 Wetland 7 0.38 acres Manage 3 10 ft 10 ft Wetland 10 0.13 acres Manage 3 10 ft 10 ft TOTAL 8.46 acres 'The wetland replacement plan only includes 8.46 acres that is closest to the development site. The total onsite wetlands are 17.4 acres. Thirty (30) ft wide wetland buffers and conservation easement with wetland signage are required around Wetland 1. There are no wetland impacts to the larger Wetland 1. Wetland 7 and Wetland 10 will be filled and mitigated for by purchasing 0.51 acres of wetland credits. Staff Comment: 1. Wetland buffer signage shall be included on the Site Plans and the City sign detail shall be included to the detail sheets. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain over the large wetland on the west side of the site. It does not appear there are any floodplain impacts. Any floodplain impacts are subject to City requirements per City Code Chapter 1103. Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by ISG in October 2024 as part of the North Oaks Development EAW. Related to the Wilkinson Waters development, the intersections of CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH J/Ash Street (Intersection #1) and CSAH 21/Centerville Road and CSAH 32/Ash Street (Intersection #2) were analyzed. Intersection #1 currently operates at a level of service F. Intersection #2 operates at a level of service D. Reconstruction of these major intersections is planned for 2025 and 2026 by Ramsey and Anoka Counties. Intersection 1 and Intersection 2 are proposed to be converted to roundabouts. With these improvements and the proposed Wilkinson Waters development, the level of service will increase to a C. Per City Code Section 1001.013(2)(c)4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. Level of service requirements are met. Noise Study 21 A noise study was prepared by esi engineering dated April 3, 2025. The results of the analysis are based on Minnesota Rule 7030 requirements. Where levels exceeded the residential noise level requirements, recommendations were developed for the building exterior facades to provide the required minimum noise reduction of 30 dBA to 37 dBA. This can be accomplished with higher construction standards for walls, windows, and sliding patios. Additional Review Comments • Anoka County Highway Department notes the proposed ROW line shown should be sufficient. The access on Ash St. will need a right turn lane and will be a right in/right out access. • Ramsey County Public Works will review and provide comments. • MnDNR reviewed the concept plan and noted Shoreland PUD requirements apply including but not limited to density, open space, and impervious surface coverage. No additional comments were provided for the preliminary plat. • City of North Oaks did not provide comments. • White Bear Township did not provide comments. • White Bear Lake ISD#624 did not provide comments. • Lino Lakes Police Division had no concerns with the proposed development. • Lino Lakes Fire Division requests the fire hydrant on the east side of Building B be located south closer to the garage entrance. • City Engineer comments are provided in the attached memo. Park Board Per the April 2, 2025 Park Board staff report, staff recommends 100% cash dedication in lieu of land. The developer will be credited to construct a minimum 8.5 ft wide public trail (depicted in green) from Wilkinson Way to the public open space property and extending the trail to Ash Street. This creates a multi -functional greenway corridor. Future passive amenities including a pavilion and benches could be considered for the public open space property. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the proposal on March 26, 2025. Their comments are attached. Neighborhood Meeting 22 As required, the developer held a neighborhood meeting on February 4, 2025. Their comments are attached. Planning & Zoning Board The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on April 9, 2025. There were two (2) public comments. Concerns included car headlights, building heights, traffic, and open space. The Board's first motion to deny the project failed 3-3. The second motion included all staff conditions plus headlight screening related to the underground garages passed 4-2. The Board supported the 55ft senior building height. A second public hearing will be held on May 14, 2025. Findings of Fact PUD, Planned Unit Development Per City Code Section 1007.024: (2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the City when it would result in one or more of the following public benefits: (a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A master plan for this area is not required per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan -Planning District 4. Per Planning District 4, a gateway should be planned at the intersection of Centerville Road and County Road J (Ash Street). The Lino Lakes Gateway Planning manual was prepared in June 2024 and includes this area. (b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. The commercial component supports economic expansion. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life -cycle housing. 23 The flexible site design configuration allows for the creation of a multi functional greenway corridor that incorporates storm water management, wetlands, open space, and trails. The development also promotes conservation and a more efficient use of land. (c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat, unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and reduction of negative impacts on the environment. The site is within the shoreland districts of Lake Wilkinson and Lake Amelia and adjacent to a large wetland complex. The large wetland will be preserved and enhanced into a multi -purpose greenway corridor and storm water management system. The corridor will also be protected by a vegetative buffer that provides additional protection to the natural resources. A stormwater reuse system will be evaluated and implemented to the extent feasible to offset the use of municipal water for irrigation. (d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. The development transitions from low intense townhomes near Wilkinson Lake and the wetland to higher intense apartments near the arterial roads. (e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. Private streets result in efficient, smaller networks of utilities and streets. This lowers development costs and public investments. (f) Mix of land use types. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types and commercial development. (g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the City. The development proposes a mix of residential housing types consisting of townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living. This variety in housing types supports life -cycle housing that is desirable to the City. (h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 24 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, page 3-3 of the Land Use Plan: Goal 1, Policy e. details the following additional public values that may be achieved in the Wilkinson Waters concept plan: • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System o 53% open space > than minimum 50% required by Shoreland PUD • Using "Green" building and low impact development techniques • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches • Providing life -cycle and affordable housing • Diversifying the tax base to lessen the tax burden on residential properties Rezoning The four (4) parcels shall be rezoned from R, Rural to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Per City Code Section 1007.015 (4): (e) The Planning and Zoning Board shall hold the public hearing and consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The PUD rezoning is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as amended. The development area is guided Signature Gateway which allows for a mix of higher density residential, commercial services and employment opportunities. 2. The proposed action is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The PUD rezoning is compatible with present and future residential land uses of the area. 3. The proposed action conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed master planned development conforms with all performance standards with minor revisions as noted. 25 4. The proposed action can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. The proposed master planned development can be accommodated with White Bear Township's existing public services and will not overburden the township's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed action is within capabilities of streets serving the property as described in § 1007.020(4)(d) of this chapter. Traffic generated by the proposed master planned development is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. Preliminary Plat Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision: (1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council. (2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision maybe deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met. (a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following: 1. Land use plan; 2. Transportation plan; 3. Utility (sewer and water) plans; 4. Local water management plan; 5. Capital improvement plan; and 6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria. Wilkinson Waters is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan regarding resource management, land use, housing, transportation and utilities. The development is also consistent with the local water management plan, capital improvement plans and growth management policies. (b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill policies: 1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the following: a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision; N3: b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer; c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available city trunk funds; and d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's capital improvement plan. 3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and 4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Wilkinson Waters is consistent with infill policies. The two (2) easterly lots containing the residential and commercial development are within Utility Staging Area 1A. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No future utility costs are proposed. (c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual: 1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade; 2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; 3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; 4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better; 5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; 6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer -financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies; 7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, 27 including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; and 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. Wilkinson Waters meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision will have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision upon completion of Ramsey and Anoka County intersections improvement. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City"s capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. (d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: 1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision; 2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision; 3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use and fire protection; and 4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. Wilkinson Waters will have an adequate water supply served by White Bear Township. (e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: 1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria; 2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density; 3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan and capital improvement plan; 4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system; and 5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing. Wilkinson Waters will be served with an adequate waste disposal system through White Bear Township. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary W Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Economic expansion 2. Greater variety of housing types such as townhomes, market rate apartments, and senior living that support life -cycle housing 3. Multi -functional greenway corridor and storm water management system 4. Transition from low intense residential development near natural resource to higher intense development near arterial roads 5. Efficient use of land and private streets resulting in a smaller network of utilities and streets 6. Diversified tax base through a mix of residential and commercial land uses 7. Creation and preservation of open space that is accessible to the public 8. More parkland dedication fees available for park/trail development 9. Wider landscape buffers and trail corridors Flexibility Provided: 1. Building height: 40 feet (3-story) and 55 feet (4-story) > allowed 36 feet height in shoreland district. 2. Floor Area: 550 square foot studio apartment unit < required 700 square feet with an additional 100 square feet per bedroom a. A maximum of 15% of all multi -family units can be studio apartments. 3. Townhomes o Base Lot Width: 142ft < 150ft Shoreland PUD requirement o Base Lot Size: 18,239sf < 20,000sf R-4 requirement 4. Multifamily Buildings o Multifamily dwellings do not meet, "Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective." 5. Setbacks o Multifamily ■ Building Side Lot Line: 15ft < 20ft requirement o Townhomes ■ Building Rear Lot Line: 15ft < 30ft requirement ■ Building Side Lot Line: 10ft < 20ft requirement 29 REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff seeks input regarding proposed 55ft senior building height and other requested PUD flexibility. For the May 27, 2025 Council meeting, staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Site & Building Plan Review for Wilkinson Waters subject to the following conditions: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall be approved by Met Council prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A joint powers agreement between Lino Lakes and White Bear Township for sanitary sewer and water shall be approved prior to approval of the final plat. 3. A Homeowner's Association shall own and maintain the outlots containing open space, wetlands, buffer, and lake. 4. A Homeowner's Association shall maintain the landscaped road medians. 5. An outlot shall be created for the upland area of the public park to the west that will be used for passive recreation. a. The outlot shall be deeded to the City. 6. In lieu of public land dedication, the City will collect cash fee. a. Credit will be given for trail construction costs. 7. A trail easement shall cover the trail corridor on Outlot F. 8. A Conservation Easement and/or Wetland Buffer Declaration shall be recorded over the wetlands and buffer. 9. The underlying conventional zoning districts shall be R-4, High Density Residential for the townhomes, apartments, and senior living building and GB, General Business for the commercial. 10. Architecture and building design standards shall meet noise study requirements. 11. A maximum of 15% of all multi -family units may be studio apartments. The following items shall be addressed prior to City Council approval of the final plat: 1. All comments from City Engineer memo dated April 2, 2025 2. All comment from Environmental Coordinator memo dated March 26, 2025 3. All comments from Anoka County Highway Department email dated March 27, 2025 4. All comments from Ramsey County Public Works to follow. 5. All lot lines, proposed ROW, etc. on all plan sheets shall be a solid line, not dashed. 6. All Wilkinson Way street right-of-way parking lot setbacks shall be a minimum of 15ft. a. All plan sheets and Design Guidelines shall be revised. 7. A wetland buffer signage location plan shall be created that includes the City sign detail. 30 8. Sheet AO-11, Phasing Plan: a. Delete chart titled Devoted Area. b. The phasing narrative does not match the Design Guidelines narrative. c. Delete density chart d. Move Site Summary chart to Site Plan sheets e. Impervious surface calculations only need to be provided on Land Use & Density Plan. 9. Sheet AO-12, Land Use Plan: a. Insert revised Land Use and Density Plan 10. Sheet AO-16, Preliminary Plat: a. Standard 10ft drainage and utility easement detail shall be included. b. Drainage and utility easements shall be labeled. c. Drainage and utility easement needed over stormwater ponds. d. Outlot D and E shall be lots and blocks on the preliminary plat. i. They can be final platted as outlots. e. Delete setbacks, height requirements, proposed zoning, etc. and just say, "See Design Guidelines for setbacks and building heights". 11. Sheets AA-20 and AA-21, Apartment Elevations: a. On all elevations, include callouts identifying each material. i. For example, where are the wood finish accents? b. On all elevations, add the building height elevation line. 12. Sheet AC-20, Clubhouse Elevations: a. Add building heights. b. Add exterior materials % and callouts. 13. Sheet AT-20, Townhome Elevations: a. Add stone base around entire buildings. 14. Sheet C3-10, Overall Site Plan: a. Building ID 14 should be senior housing b. Show trail looping through public park to Ash Street. c. The "greenway corridor" sidewalk along Wilkinson Way adjacent to the commercial shall be minimum 8.5ft wide to match trail width. 15. Sheet C3-11, Site Plan: a. On multifamily lot, i. Along the south lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 30ft rear setback. ii. Along the west lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 15ft side setback. b. On the commercial lot, i. Along the north lot line, change 15ft rear setback to 10ft side setback 16. Sheet C3-12, Site Plan: a. Label the lines. b. Label parking lot setback lines. 17. Sheet C3-13, Site Plan: 31 a. Trail shall be minimum 8.5ft wide. 18. Sheet C3-14, Site Plan: a. Label the lines. b. Label parking lot setback lines. 19. Sheet C3-21, Utility Plan: a. The fire hydrant on the east side of Building B shall be located south closer to the garage entrance. 20. Sheet E1-02, Photometric Plan: a. Photometric plans shall be required with future commercial and senior building development. 21. Sheet E1-05, Lighting Cut Sheets and Schedule: a. Light fixture labels shall be clearly noted on the photometric plans. 22. Design Guidelines booklet comments will be provided separately. 23. Six (6) ft tall privacy fences shall be installed along the underground parking lot drive lanes along Ash Street and Centerville Road to screen vehicle headlights. ATTACHMENTS 1. Design Guidelines Booklet with project narrative 2. Phasing Plan 3. Site Plans 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Existing Land Use 5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Proposed Land Use 6. Land Use & Density Plan 7. Housing Goals per 2040 Comprehensive Plan 8. PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Chart 9. Yield Plan 10. Architectural Plans 11. Preliminary Plat 12. Overall Civil and Landscape Plans 13. City Engineer Memo dated April 2, 2025 14. Anoka County Highway Department Email dated March 27, 2025 15. Environmental Board Memo dated March 26, 2025 16. Neighborhood Meeting Summary 32 too 'T 7.t lea Oro 4w. y as •�9^'"` �w., ��. �.� ��.'H'�'N'l.+ .t.. �-0 CITV,�,�,, nF I-NO�1iKE$ CITY OF LINO LAKES - DESIGN GUIDELINES & STATEMENT OF INTENT WILKINSON WATERS Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 2 Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City of Lino Lakes Rob Rafferty, Mayor Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Katie Larsen, City Panner Diane Hankee, City Engineer, WSB Kendra Lindahl, Landform ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC Mark Houge Lauren G ro u ws ISG, inc. Jerremy Foss TJ Wells CRW architects and desiizners Teresa McCormack Savanna Designs, Inc. Jim Hagstrom Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & STATEMENT OF INTENT • Zoning and Planned Land Use • Transportation Systems • Proposed Zoning and Yield Plan • Phasing and Dedication A. Site Plan • Building Setbacks • Parking Setbacks B. Gateway Elements C. Architectural Standards D. Proposed Materials E. Building Heights F. Floor Plan Requirements G. Landscaping H. Signage I. Renderings Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 5 INTRODUCTION & STATEMENT OF INTENT ISG is submitting this PUD Preliminary Plan and Plat Development package on behalf of Anoka Holdings, llc., developer, and North Oaks Farms, Inc., the land owner, for approximately 75.89 acres of land within the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County. The property is generally located at the southwest corner of Centerville Road (County Road 21) and Ash Street (County Road 32), situated in the southeast portion of the City. This project will provide multiple land uses but will be considered as a comprehensive development plan, rather than isolated parcels of development. The proposed land uses include 34,000 square feet, approximately, of commercial retail space, two (2) — three story 100 unit market rate multi- family building (including clubhouse, large communal green space, and additional amenities), 40 townhome units, and one (1) —100 unit senior living facility. In addition to these land uses there will be a regional stormwater management system that will be integrated into the natural landscape North of Wilkinson Lake. ZONING AND 2040 PLANNED LAND USE The current property is zoned as Rural according to the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Map. Figure 1 below depicts an aerial with the approximate development property outlined in red. This existing zoning district is guided by the City of Lino Lakes 2024 Comprehensive Plan for a mix of Signature Gateway, High Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential. A snip of the future land use map is below in Figure 2. Additionally, Figure 3 below is a snippet of the Land Use Designation table from the Comprehensive Plan to describe the three uses identified for the proposed parcels. w Figure 1: Aerial of Proposed Property 2040 Future Land Use Ash St Lake \ Ml Signature Gateway Dismct Filkinso M Medium Densty Residential High Density Residenbal City of North Oaks Figure 2: Future Land Use Plan (Excerpt) Am. n Medium Density Residential development at 4.0 to 6.0 dwelling units per Residential acre High Density Residential Residential development at 6.0 to 8 0 units per acre A mix of higher density residential, commercial services Signature Gateway and employment opportunities. Residential densities of 8.0 District to 10.0 units per acre are permitted and the Council may approve up to 15 units per acre Figure 3: Future Land Use Description Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 16 In addition to the Future Land Use Plan the proposed development also lies within the Shoreland Overlay Zone of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake. The shoreland overlay boundary can be seen on the associated submittal plan documents and is governed by a 1,000-foot radius from the ordinary high water level of the associated lakes. The high-water level for Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake are 895.2 and 908.1, respectively. In addition to this Preliminary PUD and Plat submittal Anoka Holdings, Ilc. is also submitting a concurrent Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow for the orderly development of the parcels, to align with the overall objective of ensuring the Signature Gateway is a welcoming corridor to the City of Lino Lakes. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS The transportation network surrounding the proposed development is well established and is also undergoing substantial improvements. These roadway improvements are being completed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County and are currently in the design phase. The easterly frontage of the property is Centerville Road which is currently a rural section two lane road with roadside ditches and no pedestrian paths. The proposed Anoka County Project will improve the road to an urban curb and gutter cross section maintaining two travel lanes, one in each direction, and providing a 10' pedestrian trail on the westerly side of the right-of-way. The northern frontage is Ash Street which is currently a two-lane rural section roadway with roadside ditches and no pedestrian access, Ash Street will remain in its current condition after development. In addition to the pedestrian and road section improvements along Centerville Road (County Road 21), the intersections of Centerville Road with both Wilkinson Lake Blvd/County Road J and Ash Street (County Road 32) are being improved. Currently, both intersections are controlled with stop signs, Wilkinson Lake Blvd with a 4-way stop and Ash Street with a 1-way stop (this is an existing T- Intersection). The new intersection control, at both intersections, will be a roundabout design and executed by both Anoka County and Ramsey County. Additionally, this new traffic control pattern will help moving traffic from the City of Lino Lake to 1-35E directly to the east. The new roundabout at the Wilkinson Lake Blvd and Centerville Road intersection will also assist in providing the proposed development to serve as the Signature Gateway destination as planned in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Both Centerville Road and Ash Street are both functionally classified as Minor Arterials. The existing average annual daily traffic on Ash Street and Centerville Road is 5,100 vehicles per day and 10,700 vehicles per day, respectively (MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application, 2022). Traffic Study has been completed and processed as part of the EAW submittal. Internally, to the proposed development a new street, Wilkinson Way, will be constructed, making a loop connection to the Centerville Road to the East and Ash Street to the north. This proposed ROW will be 60' wide and will be constructed to the standards of a public street in the City of Lino Lakes. This roadway may be Private or Public and will be determined during the Development Agreement process. If Wilkinson Way remains a private street, a public access and utility easement will be placed overtop to ensure the City of Lino Lakes has access and authority to maintain and operate the proposed public Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 17 utilities. All other roads internal to the development will be private drives and maintained by the development. PROPOSED ZONING & YIELD PLAN This project is being submitted as Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the City of Lino Lakes, a change from the existing zoning classification of Rural. The development team has had multiple meetings with the City Staff to confirm interpretation of the Cities' Zoning Ordinances, 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and submittal requirements. It has been determined that this project be submitted as PUD with a base zoning of R-4 — High Density Residential and GB — General Business, for the residential and commercial developments, respectively. These parcel zones will lie predominately within the Shoreland Overlay of both Wilkinson Lake and Amelia Lake and are also identified to be in the Signature Gateway District, High Density and Medium Density residential districts as indicated on the 2040 comprehensive plan. As such there are a few flexibilities that are being requested to be included as part of the PUD process: Maximum building height to be up to 55 feet in height, at the mid rake for the average of the grade, or a maximum of 4 stories, whichever is greater. Minimum square footage, of 550 square feet for units to allow studio apartments. A maximum of 15% of all multi -family units can be Studio apartments. For Apartments with bedrooms would have a minimum of 700 square feet with additional 100 square feet per bedroom, as stated in the Code (1007.114 R-4(5)). In regards to the overall development the below table outlines the described allowable density and the proposed density of the development: \lediumDen-it, \IeditunDensit, High Densit, SigtiutmeGatetsac \paitutenn. Toanhotnes. Southnest Parcel Nottheest Parcel Conntetcial and Seniot 1.Mng Total Wetlattds&WaterBodes 15.20 0.00 36.6- Public Parks 5 Open Space 0.00 0.00 96 369 -%neral RO\\' 0.00 000 0.00 3.12 412 Easements 0.00 0.00 279 3.13 CommerctalLand 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.90 490 Per tttm AledGuided Siprrre Gateway Total 61 R�cid�r�nl 261 R�ciil—�l p�cid�eti6l 3040 Co tehemse Plato Required Net Dram 10 to 6 0 upa 10 to 6 0 upa 6 0 to 3 0 upa 8.0-10.0 WK tax. 15 Required - Housu¢ Units Loa 0 13' is- I*h 0 351 351 DUA based an i;rets DUA-Loa 000 3.00 3.00 DUA-Hi¢ 15.00 15.00 Pr sed . Houstne Units 0 0 340 340 ProposedGrossDetauc(units+actr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.46 4.43 Proposed Net Densin (units acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.54 14.54 Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 18 As shown by the above table, the project is above the maximum unit density by right, however, it is requested that the density of the Signature Gateway be extended to a maximum of 15 units/acre. This request is within the maximum 15 units/acre allowed per the Signature Gateway definition, with City approval, within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. PHASING AND LAND DEDICATION The proposed development will be executed in multiple phases. The initial phase will be the mutli-family residential buildings with an associated clubhouse, followed by a phase of the townhome units. With this initial phasing work, it is the intent of the development to construct the public improvements within the public right-of-way including paving, utilities, and storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the site. The right-of-way will be dedicated back to the City of Lino Lakes along with any public easements needed for utility extensions. Additionally, the regional stormwater management basins will be constructed which will also be utilized as re -use irrigation system for the common spaces throughout the PUD development. All the natural resources that exist, Wilkinson Lake and the wetlands, will be dedicated to the City as Park to be a new amenity to the City. The newly constructed stormwater management ponds will also be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes for Ownership and Maintenance, as a regional solution to stormwater for the development adjacent to Wilkinson Lake, in lieu of multiple smaller stormwater basins that incur additional maintenance cost to the City. All equipment, piping, etc required for the re -use irrigation system will be privately owned and maintained by the developer. The next phases of development will consist of the remaining town home units and retail/commercial development at the southeast corner of the site. Following that would be the construction of the senior living residential building. The final timing and phasing pattern will be coordinated with the City and will be dependent upon the market demand, but the general pattern will follow residential units first followed by the commercial use at the end. We appreciate the opportunity to bring this submittal package before the City of Lino Lakes Staff, Boards and the City of Lino Lakes Council. We look forward to work with the City to bring a development to the community that will make an impact and statement as the southeast entrance into the community. Sincerely, 2�y Jerremy Foss, PE Civil Engineering Practice Group Leader Jerremy.Foss@ISGlnc.com Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 19 A. SITE PLAN R-4 SETBACKS PER ZONING: From Street Right-of-way Major Collector or arterial street — 40 feet Local or minor collector street — 30 feet Parking lot —15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Rear lot line Principal Building — 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory building — 5 feet Parking lot — 5 feet Side lot line Principal Building — 20 feet Requesting a flexibility to 10 feet Accessory Building-5 feet Parking lot — 5 feet Zero lot line- Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied to a common wall of multifamily dwelling units. •6 ` * -- 5d�, c i General Business Setbacks per Zoning ( future ): From Street Right-of-way Major Collector or arterial street — 40 feet Local or minor collector street — 30 feet Parking lot —15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Rear lot line Principal Building — 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory Building - 5 feet Parking lot —10 feet Side lot line Principal Building — 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Accessory Building —10 feet Parking lot —10 feet Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 10 B. GATEWAY ELEMENTS The Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies Signature Gateway requirements. The Intersection of Centerville Road and Wilkinson Boulevard will serve as the primary entrance to this development. The retail and business center will provide the first impressions and contribute to the character of the community. The architectural standards acknowledged below are the parameters for the design of building and supporting site components. A pallet of materials for the building fagades basis of design is included. The landscape and site development will be integrated into the approach and design of the buildings. Exterior Mechanical and Electrical equipment will be screened from view. Signage will be owner provided and maintained. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 10 Proposed Gateway sign theme will be compatible with established tradition of neighboring North Oaks and Waverly Gardens. Neighborhood connection and pedestrian scale - Materials compatible with natural stone, water, and vegetation. C. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Wilkinson Waters is planned in accordance with the four-sided architecture as noted in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. All facades will be articulated with a variety of material, glazing, overhangs and details that are engaging to the community and provide visual interest. Street facing facades incorporate offsets in either recesses or projections that support the program of the building at least every 50 feet along the facade. Building design elements should express vertical articulation to support a series of building areas, supported by the offsets and variation in materials. The linear design of the buildings and definition of stories should be supported by the repetition of fenestration heights and alignment, strong repetitive balcony/ canopy lines, Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 11 and accented eaves or cornices. Roof details and eave, cornice lines are to remain consistent on all sides of the building. Architectural Standards. • The exterior walls shall include a variation in building materials distributed throughout the building and coordinated into the design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. • At least 33% of each exterior wall at Multi- Family and Commercial structures shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. • Townhouse and Single-family structures will be composed of a minimum of 25% brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. This is calculated over the combination of all facades. A single facade will not contain more than 75% of a single finish, unless it is brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. • For the purposes of this section, the area of each exterior wall shall not include areas devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. Commercial buildings, if added, will be calculated with Glazing as a finish. • Each exterior wall shall be articulated to add visual interest. Large blank exterior walls should be prohibited. Variation in exterior walls can be accomplished with projections or recesses, material changes, or other methods of building articulation. • Minimum overhang. All dwellings with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12- inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. • All sloped roofs shall be covered with shingles, tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 12 D. PROPOSED MATERIALS Wilkinson Waters will have a pallet of exterior materials that reflect and complement the nature surrounding the site. The pallet below is compatible with the neighboring Waverly Gardens neighborhood. Materials will comply with the Classes of Primary Materials noted in 1007.043. The Elevations will comply with Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 materials as noted in the standards and zoning requirements. See attached spreadsheet noting material calculations. WOOD FINISH ACCENTS ASPHALT SHINGLES WINDOW TRIM FACADE ACCENT sINN 1►..J� �►. `� 4 -Ljius. mfta.. ASHLAR STONF FXTFRIOR STUCCO Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 13 E. BUILDING HEIGHTS Wilkinson Waters will have a variety of building heights that are reflective of the use and density. Measurement and story determination will be consistent with Minnesota State Building Code for determination of actual dimensions. At Multi- family buildings, the applicant will request the flexibility to be the greater of 4 stories or 55' from grade to mid -rake of slope roof or top of parapet of flat roof. This language is consistent withl007.115 R-5, (8). The apartments shown below and proposed in this phase are 3 stories with a mid -rake or building height of 3 stories and 39' mid rake. ®I ■ ■ 1■ n ■ n n il.l u I 1 ■ :: 771n n : 1 u u. tlt n : 'In� , n 1■ n I :... ■ : ;: 1 n ; : u :r ■ ■I E�Itu■ , , n ■ p ■ CJ ■ ■ 1■ ■ The multi -family buildings will be the have greater than 33% Class 1 materials on each fagade. Visual interest is developed with fagade offsets and recessed decks, these elements are further emphasized with roof articulations. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 14 TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS The townhome will m m m m m m�Mm be the have greater than 25% Class 1 materials on the CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS --- ---------- combined fagade area. Visual interest is developed with fagade offsets and recessed decks The Clubhouse will be the have greater than 25% Class 1 materials on the combined fagade area. Visual interest is developed with porches and overhangs. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 15 F. FLOOR PLAN REQUIREMENTS Wilkinson Waters is planned in accordance with the Lino Lakes General Building and Use Provisions for the building types proposed. Two Family Dwellings and Townhouses. Unit width will be a minimum of 24'. The living area will be greater than 800 sf on the main floor, An additional 100 sf shall be accounted for to cover utility space and each bedroom. The attached Garage will be greater than 20' wide with a minimum footprint of 520 sq.ft. Decks and patios are included in the initial floor plans. Storm shelters will be included in the plan, integrated within the usable space. Multi Family Dwellings and Townhouses. Unit width will be a minimum of 700 sf. With an additional 100 A Per each bedroom. Utility space will be incorporated within each living unit as well as building wide. Recycling and garbage collection will be within the main building structure. One parking stall will be provided for each unit in the lower -level parking garage. The plan for this parking garage will conform to 1007.052 Off street parking. Designed as a 90-degree car park stall, a minimum of 9 feet wide and 18' in length with a minimum aisle of 24' in width. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 16 G. LANDSCAPING The landscaping concept will support the community aspect of this residential development. Walking paths will connect the residential buildings with the community center and central recreation area. Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 17 H. SIGNAGE: DESCRIPTION Signage will be compatible with the buildings and attached pallet, utilizing similar colors and materials. It is understood that exterior sign structures will be individually permitted with the City of Lino Lakes. ..r Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 18 I. RENDERINGS ENTRANCE TO APARTMENT EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN VIEW OF APARTMENTS Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 19 W14mr"Ilk Ir ���i�ll��i�L�]�C�]�i�l�l:[O ►] EMI Wilkinson Waters Design Guidelines Page 1 20 a -low EVEN t I ITrrt- . IIII -- I�lf�lb ��- �S I. . ;% Architectural Standards: Multiple -Family Dwellings Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Elevation 1 (Entrance) % N Elevation 2 (End) % Elevation 3 (Street Face) % Elevation 4 (End) % Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 34.8% Artificial stone 46.0% Artificial stone 34.0% Artificial stone 33.7% Metal Panel 17.0% Metal Panel 15.0% Metal Panel 14.0% Metal Panel 16.3% Stucco 48.2% Stucco 39.0% Stucco 52.0% Stucco 50.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 34.8% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 46.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 34.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 33.7% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(c) ff NOTES 1. The exterior walls shall include a variation in building materials distributed throughout the building and coordinated into the design of the structure to create ar Materials Distributed in a consistent patern architecturally balanced appearance. throughout the facade 2. At least 33% of each exterior wall shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. See tables above. 3. For the purposes of this section, the area of each exterior wall shall not include Areas calculated based on wall area, no doo lor area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. windows included 4. Each exterior wall shall be articulated to add visual interest. Large blank exterior walls shall be prohibited. Variation in exterior walls can be accomplished with projections or recesses, material changes, or other methods of building articulation. Recessed Decks provided for each living unit. 5. Distinct ground level(s). The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two Design is artculated to complement the stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper neigbhoring Waverly Gardens. Materials and stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an massing is organized to emphasize the intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building individual living units. Horizontal elements materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other are supported with the strong line and shodo elements which meet the objective. line of the balconies. All roof overhangs are 24" with an enclosed 6. Minimum overhang. All dwellings with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12- soffit. Continous overhang at balconies are inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. 7'. 7. All sloped roofs shall be covered with shingles, tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Sloped roofs will be a textured shingle. 8. A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be in an undergroun Parking below building will meet or exceed 1 parking area or in a parking area below the building. Ispace per unit. Architectural Standards: Two Family Dwellings and Townhouse Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Street Elevation % Greenway Elevation End Elevation North ° End Elevation South % Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 42.0% Artificial stone 32.0% Artificial stone 29.0% Artificial stone 29.0% Stucco 58.0% Stucco 68.0% Stucco 71.0% Stucco 71.0% [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 42.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 32.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 29.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 29.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(b) K NOTES 1. Unit width. The minimum width of a two-family or townhouse dwelling unit shall be 24 feet. The minimum footprint per unit shall be established within the zoning district. Units are 29' wide 2. Unit construction. a. Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished illustrating exterior buildin materials and colors to demonstrate compliance with division (2)(b)2.d. below. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. b. Decks or porches. Provisions shall be made for possible decks, porches, or additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. c. Minimum overhang. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12 inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. Overhangs are 24" and have enclosed soffits d. Exterior building finish. The exterior of townhouse dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades on all sides and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhouse dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: See tables above: Aggregate of all elevations I. A minimum of 25% of the combined area of all building walls shall have an provides 25% stone and 75% Stucco with exterior finish of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. decorative trim ii. Except for brick, natural stone, or artificial stone, no single building wall shall have more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. See tables above. iii. For the purpose of this section, the area of the building walls shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. e. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall be covere with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Sloped roof will have textured shingles 3. Storm shelter. In cases where dwelling units are constructed slab on -grade, provisions shall be made to provide for storm protection either internally to the unit or in a separate storm shelter structure. Compliance with this requirement shall be based upon Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines and standards which are on file with the City Building Official. 4. Garages. Each dwelling unit shall have a garage that is a minimum of 20 feet i width and has a minimum footprint of 520 square feet. Garages are 22' wide and exceed 600 sf. 5. Utilities. a. Public utility service. Separate public utility services shall be provided to each unit unless exempted by the City Engineer. b. Sewer connection. Where more than one unit is served by a sanitary sewer service, all maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owners. 6. Homeowners association. A homeowners association shall be established for all townhouses, multiple -family and townhouse developments subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall be responsible for all exterior building maintenance, approval of any exterior architectural modifications, landscaping, snow clearing and regular maintenance of private streets and other areas owned in common when there is more than one individual property owner having interest within the development. Architectural Standards: Two Family Dwellings and Townhouse Information to be filled in Information to be corrected Entry / West Elevation % Pool Side/ East Elevation % N South Elevation ° North Elevation ° Brick Brick Brick Brick Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Natural stone Artificial stone 53.0% Artificial stone 42.0% Artificial stone 64.0% Artificial stone 31.0% Stucco 47.0% Stucco 58.0% Stucco 36.0% Stucco 69.0% [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] [Insert Other Materials] TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 53.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 42.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 64.0% TOTAL Brick and/or Stone % = 31.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% TOTAL Elevation % = 100.0% REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE SECTION 1007.043(2)(b) 1. Unit width. The minimum width of a two-family or townhouse dwelling unit shall be 24 feet. The minimum footprint per unit shall be established within the zoning district. NA 2. Unit construction. a. Building elevations and floor plans shall be furnished illustrating exterior buildin materials and colors to demonstrate compliance with division (2)(b)2.d. below. Building floor plans shall identify the interior storage space within each unit. b. Decks or porches. Provisions shall be made for possible decks, porches, or Porches and exterior structures are a part of additions as part of the initial dwelling unit building plans. the original design. c. Minimum overhang. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall have a minimum 12 inch roof overhang and enclosed soffit. Overhangs are 24" and have enclosed soffits d. Exterior building finish. The exterior of townhouse dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades on all sides and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhouse dwelling Clubhouse is of similar architecture to structures shall comply with the following requirements: townhouses and apartment building i. A minimum of 25% of the combined area of all building walls shall have an exterior finish of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. See tables above. ii. Except for brick, natural stone, or artificial stone, no single building wall shall have more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. See tables above. III. For the purpose of this section, the area of the building walls shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. e. All dwellings, including an attached garage, with a sloped roof shall be covere with shingles or tiles or a standing seam metal roof. Sloped roof will have textured shingles 3. Storm shelter. In cases where dwelling units are constructed slab on -grade, provisions shall be made to provide for storm protection either internally to the unit or in a separate storm shelter structure. Compliance with this requirement shall be based upon Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines and standards which are on file with the City Building Official. 4. Garages. Each dwelling unit shall have a garage that is a minimum of 20 feet i width and has a minimum footprint of 520 square feet. No garage on this stsructure 5. Utilities. a. Public utility service. Separate public utility services shall be provided to each unit unless exempted by the City Engineer. b. Sewer connection. Where more than one unit is served by a sanitary sewer service, all maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owners. 6. Homeowners association. A homeowners association shall be established for all townhouses, multiple -family and townhouse developments subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. The homeowners' association shall be responsible for all exterior building maintenance, approval of any exterior architectural modifications, landscaping, snow clearing and regular maintenance of private streets and other areas owned in common when there is more than one individual property owner having interest within the development. Attachment 2. Phasing Plan PUBLIC TRAIL CONSTRUCTED WITH c - , RA MSEY COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS - 7T; -� ENTERI//LLERD TO CENTERVILLE ROAD - a t ' / ------------------ Q - r------- _ - - - - - _____________--- PHASE 1A-.--------------------�- �inlr, sFTRar.r< ------ 40' BUILDING SETBACK I • - I - � p �� PHASE 4 i I / / I ...:.:.:./41 . .. .. .. .. .. ...:.:.:,.,....:.:.:.: I 8000, / IBA , FUTURE ANOKA COUNTY / .� IIJ PROPOSED + I / .. 7111 RAIN GARDENSrI ,• I %' ."'•',v \ TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED i/ ''°°''%` J i I X / %' WITH ASH STREET / ' �% / .. IMPROVEMENTS / + iLxj I 1� F� 9p0 / l / Z \ \ cal 14 x / �000", F// / ll o v t ti • \\\\ \\\\ Ilr,gitir ttq �� / / \ \ 77111 III •.tlllt EX SB- • \ \ riit4iu�" + r+1iJ /' : l r: • \� 7,r+;�1r 7rtt • , 1. 1 .............., / // f __ �� .. \\\\ \\ a tttr �,' / / � • / � // � / / IllltOypO��O� GARDEN 2J•,1 ' / .1LKINSO N WAY 71 ---� -- --- -- --- --� r-- --- --- --- ---I r-- --- -- --- --� -- --- --- --- --� / 0 u �S'J IQ'I _ I u 1 PHASE 3 /� � Pig .009 PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO CONNECT -- l - , I ;� C ALL THREE PUBLIC TRAILS ------------------------------------ ---- PHASE 2 ,I EX SB-st5 OQ i : = - ��% // I,Jltti7±it7 0 +IIr11117r +tttt / 77771 ��� / 1 7�111tJ,��7771111 �J,illtllftt / 1111J r+ 71 r111tt1ttt711J171 tltlltr7+777111+ 1 1 1777 1+t Itt 7 �� 17777ttttJJ tt +Itttll t71t7ttJJ \ o � 7J,11177711t11 7,111171t77111J 77711111 �.. rl 17 1 77 tt +1 77 r / JJlttltt Ittttr+117 1111 ,JJ 111 +1 11777„tlJttlJ lttt +11 11, 7111 +777 17771111JJ1717tJtII1111J��11111t1lllltt1t11 111 77711 11777 J+ 11117 111 Ill I77 17 Illl Itt rt711 l777111 1 Ji�1,, � 13/ l�( � � s / / / 71+t1111ii iJlrrti 1111rt lr 1� r1t +1 1 tl +1t +r rt 111 + 1 0 / M r ! r / 111111711171 77 ��1111 tJl 7I11177 illll 17)•11 11 71117 1111 7 7111 +1J 111t J, 111111171t771117J17r111 I777 rltttJltttttJJr11J1 +11JJtr111JJJ7+71 t7111J77771t 1+777171 -- 1 rr 1 t7�y�-' 17 . �."',_.. , \ // \ ++1tt11,11"7t171111 Illl 1111171771111+LYjj1+1r1111IIIr11t11I11t7I1rJROh„•1111L.J 1777111111777111111771t7111111771111 1171111rJ771111JJ111t7Jl+llJttl tT11J IIII (� I 11 77 1J 11 1 7 11 17 tt t1 I7 r 11 7 7 J, 1,11 f`� 1� R .o G"" l / \ JII J17771 tJl+llt tt1111 J It 171 + +tttt77 tI11f1JJt771tJJU Nw°ISE9oaes SIN itlll I +11 7711 t + 11111111 J Ilt J 777 t 111 JJ 11 11 +1! +t 71 77 11 +° - Ilt IJ 11 11 71 I77 4 11 777 11 11 7 / o -------, L------------ --- r=------- -----� %`�-------_ PHASE 1 B I ; / I I I I I r,l titti?tt, , RAIN \` II N II II u u II I+ u u ---- - ---- J ----- - ----- J ----- - ----- ----- - ----- J ----- - ----- J--- SITE SUMMARY PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: S34 T31 N R22W LINO LAKES, MN EXISTING ZONING: R ZONING PUD SITE/LOT AREA: 3,305,769 SF (75.9 AC) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS. 0 SF (0.0 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 641,203 SF (14.7 AC) DISTURBED AREA: 1,310,712 SF (30.1 AC) PARKING STALLS PROVIDED MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENT SURFACE PARKING 191 COVERED PARKING 210 TOTAL 401 (400 REQUIRED) PARKING STALLS PROVIDED TOWNHOMES SURFACE PARKING 40 COVERED PARKING 40 TOTAL 80 (80 REQUIRED) \ \ /' / \\ +JtII111tJt71711+11 I;,it71+1111+I11It 7111117 JI1711�7r+I77171177��111JJJII7111J1IIII-11111r771t11r111777111117711111171771111JJI71171�llrllllll+JJtttlr7 • o it 7 11 11 Il 11 1711 1177 1111 l7711 11t77 J1117 tIJ111JJI7711JJJ1r711 JJI+/1J 111JJ77771t / / ��" 1 t 1 1111777J1r1117711tlttttt77+111171771„7 71,J 111777111i11ut1ii11utiJii+itrtlii+ilrttii1t+117iitti+11+JJJt711111±tt?17 7 777 777 +177 r+11 1717 1177 +117 1117 +Ill Il 1177 ---------- / u,-- .i1 \ _ �_ 17J71 111+IIt77177111JJI1771 t711111Jt771r7171t771111177711t11 J17711r77 rr7 117 / / Errlttl tttt77 Ilrltt Wr1111177til1111 17711171 Irrr I7 / ` 11177711111�1111,111J1JJJ++IIlJJr771tr \ / / +I,IlIJ7111,1�77 S -st-1 / BENC MARK HYDRANT DEVOTED AREA TOTAL SITE AREA: 75.9 AC AREA DEVOTED TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: 56AC AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USES: 18.5 AC (24%) AREA DEVOTED TO RESIDENTIAL USE BY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE TYPE OR USE TYPE (PROPOSED RANGE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING SIZES): TOWNHOUSE: 7,500 SF APARTMENT / SENIOR LIVING: 43,500-46,000 COMMERCIAL: 5,500-18,050 AREA DEVOTED TO COMMON OPEN SPACE: 0.0 AC AREA DEVOTED TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: 45.5 AC (60%) AREA DEVOTED TO STREETS: 6.7 AC (9%) AREA DEVOTED TO COMMERCIAL USES: 5.2 AC (7%) AREA DEVOTED TO INDUSTRIAL OR OFFICE USES: 0.0 AC PROJECT PHASES GROSS PHASE USE DWELLING PARCEL DEVELOPABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLIC OPEN UNITS AREA (ACRE) AREA (ACRE) (ACRE) SPACE (ACRE) PHASE 1A RESIDENTIAL 200 75.9 9.3 6.7 45.9 PHASE 1B RESIDENTIAL 20 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 20 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 SENIOR PHASE 3 100 3.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 RESIDENTIAL PHASE 4 COMMERCIAL - 5.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 PHASE 1 WILL INCLUDE MASS GRADING OF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AREA AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FEATURES FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS WILKINSON LAKE. PHASE 1A WILL CONSIST OF THE MARKET RATE RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDINGS. EACH BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO HAVE 100 UNITS. THESE BUILDINGS WILL BE STAGGERED IN CONSTRUCTION STAGING. PHASE 1 B WILL CONSIST OF HALF OF THE TOWNHOME UNITS AND THESE WILL COME ONLINE TOWARDS THE END OF COMPLETION OF THE MARKET RATE APARTMENT UNITS. PHASE 2 WILL CONSIST OF THE WESTERN HALF OF THE TOWNHOME UNITS. PHASE 3 WILL BE SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS. PHASE 4 WILL BE THE COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENT AND THESE BUILDINGS MAY COME ONLINE AT MULTIPLE INDIVIDUAL PHASES AS WELL. ALL PHASING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS AND DEPENDENT ON MARKET CONDITIONS ' ��- 11,t l NOTE: BELOW CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON REVISED CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE \\ ; /J1� �� �� �/ TNFH = 919.06 AMENDMENT APPLICATION - SUBMITTED SEPARATELY TO THIS APPLICATION. a -- � r O 0�1t1� � �Q PROPOSED PUBLIC TRAIL THROUGH WETLANDS AND CONNECTED TO /' CO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY W-- r r ♦ '► / ' / r ' r r r �_/ OF l � � PARKING TOTALS ARE ONLY REFLECTIVE OF THE MARKET RATE MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENT SITE AND TOWNHOMES. REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SITE ARE 2 PARKING UNITS PER UNIT WITH AT LEAST HALF OF THE UNITS BEING COVERED PARKING SPACES. r , r COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE 1 SPACE PER 200 SQ FEET. THE FINAL PARKING COUNTS WILL BE PROVIDED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. SENIOR FAMILY PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE 1.5 PER UNIT WITH AT HALF OF THE SPACES , PROVIDED BEING UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS. FINAL PARKING COUNTS WILL BE PROVIDED AT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE SENIOR APARTMENTS. 0 80 160 Y r r ' � � r ' � i GARBAGE WASTE AND RECYCLING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN THE UNDERGROUND SCALE IN FEET PARKING LEVEL OF THE BUILDING ' Medium Density Southwest Parcel Medium Density Northwest Parcel High Density - Signature Gateway Apartments, Townhomes, Commercial, and Senior Living Total Gross Area (acres) 15.20 15.13 0.00 45.55 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.20 12.06 0.00 9.41 36.67 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 2.73 0.00 0.80 3.53 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.12 4.12 Easements 0.00 0.35 0.00 2.79 3.13 Commercial Land 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.90 4.90 Net Area (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.54 23.54 Guided Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan MediumDensity Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Signature Gateway Total Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 6.0 to 8.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max 15 Required # Housing Units Low 0 0 0 188 188 High 0 0 0 353 353 DUA based on Units DUA- Low 0 4.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 DUA-High 0 6.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 Proposed # Housing Units 0 0 0 340 340 Proposed Gross Density (units/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.46 4.48 Proposed Net Density (units/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.44 14.44 z 0 FM V FM Cl) 0 V 1 architecture 0 + design group u FM 0 z z I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE Uj FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY W DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. No. E-39500 am SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. O © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT FM ANOKA C.) HOLDINGS, LLC D W WILKINSON FM WATERS Cl) z LINO LAKES MINNESOTA 0 REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 u FM PROJECT NO. 24-30671 O FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE-OVERALL DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 >= CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE Q z PHASING PLAN J LU SHEET A0=1 I a Attachment 3. Site Plans SpN LAKE) lw ILKEN PNO 1000' SH RE ND OV 4000, BACHMAN SR, WARREN D r 0000, 1465ASH ST 34-3122-42-0004 WRUCK, CARYD BACHMAN SR, WARREND&A CRANDALL SANDER, LOWEL J MALLMAN, KELSEYM HALL, LAWRENCEM 1443ASHST. 1487ASHST. 1509ASHST. 1557ASHST. >565ASHST. 34-31-22-42-0003 34-31-22-42-0005 34-31-22-42-0001 34-3122-41-0008 34-3122-41-0004 BUILDING ID NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE 1 100 APARTMENTS 2 100 APARTMENTS 3 - CLUBHOUSE 4 4 TOWNHOME 5 4 TOWNHOME 6 4 TOWNHOME 7 4 TOWNHOME .'MLgKE. LANZKENT C & ✓EANN/NEA ` 1579 ASH ST. 1-000ti CERONSKY, CAROL YN M y O O O WOODSTROM, ✓ERF 1573ASH ST. G O 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0005 34-31-22-41-0001 BUILDING ID 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE BUILDING ID NO. UNITS BUILDING SQ. FOOTAGE BUILDING USE 4 TOWNHOME 15 10,500 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL 4 TOWNHOME 16 5,488 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL 4 TOWNHOME 17 18,012 SQ. FT COMMERCIAL RETAIL 4 TOWNHOME NOTE: DETAILED SITE PLAN SHEETS ARE LOCATED ON SHEETS C3-11 TO C3-14 4 TOWNHOME 4 TOWNHOME 100 TOWNHOME- - LAKE AMELIA V W W O ? ^ W cp � o Wy Zy ro N 2^� OEM ,ems ORIAA �it _ - = I ASH STREET 0002 WET 77�-- -.1Y 1 -� — — __ IN - _ \\\ w — — — — — — OF_OS`ED TRAIL �C — 1 � BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43--0012 � � �T ` \� � Nl �-� � � \V 11 \V A \ 1 AV A SHEAREN, W/LLIAMR - - - - - - - 1` \ 3ORTH 44-SFARMS/NC � \ 34-31-22-43-0013 � \\ 0006 - - . . . . . . . ...... �- - - - - -- f- . . . . . . . . - 30' WETLAND BUFFER / . . . . . . - - & CONSERVATION EASEMENT . . . . . . . . . v NORTH OAKS FARMS INC . . ~ 2 . . . . . . . . . . . \ \\ �\ O \ \\ 34-31-22-4!�-0008' �r J 1 \ (J� \ \ f \ . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \\� 9 \ \ i /.• . . . . . . . . . . . ./' .i . . . . . . . . . / NORTH OAKS FARMS INC �� `� \ Q' - - • - — 34-31-22-44-0001 \\ \\ \\ - -<---- .� I \ \ . . . . . . . . . . . . . NORTHOAKSF �Sj-w- . ... . . . . . �icT ` I .� 34-31-22-44-0008 w. �, a �- - - - - - - - GREENW 10 \ , 2 NORTHOAKS FARMS /NC ��ti 9'A - - - - - - - - . �� . �/ . .I �.� w. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RIDpR 11 \\ 34-31-22-43 0010 T / . . . . .. . .. \ : . . . \ : . . \ a� ` . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` v`��'� r 1 �' C - . . . - - - /� - ,� WI�KINSON LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATFINE - �,� \ .p e I 1 �' , 1 13 383 83 3_ —w II �� �® -- --- --- I vi v v v --- gig O- % d> �1. -- -- / !� s� - �2 o E 1 \ .Q C"'u. . . . . . . .> . . . . J,7 t . . . . . . III ` . f . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . .Z---^ .. . . . oII , I 1 ��................. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. . . . . . . . ` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .--------_ 1 I \ / - NORTH OAKS FARMS lN. - \ � /. '34-3122-43-b006 - I I ==� w\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . - % � -------------- ---14 - / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I WETLAND 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Ed- . • WETLAND 7 � ' w / - - - - - - - - - - J- . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •MANAGE 2 - - - - - - m (TO BE MITIGATED) � w `�- / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 \ � /- - - - - - - - - - - - - i/ . - - • • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APIOX. ORDINARY 30' WETLAND BUFFER / HH WATER LEVEL00/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . - - 8 5.z & CONSERVATION EASEMENT •a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I. 100 UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r BENCHMARK HYDRAN I \ wF COUNTYOFANOKA \ 6101 CEN TER VIL L E RD 35-31-22-32-0004 •` t 9 to ilkkylyi architecture + design group FUTURE ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION BY ANOKA COUNTY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. DONL/NA 6100cEN THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, 35-31-22- INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT WETLAND 10 (TO BE MITIGATED) ° WILK/NS01V LAKEBL IADa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TNFH=919.06 cn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII n n III II II IIIIIII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OFNORTHOAKS INC NORTH OAKS . . 04302232U002FARM . 2210019 LERD O S /NC I PRESBYTERIAN HOMES 5919 CENTERVIL I � / 04302 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LGJ 0 . . . . . . . . . . I L_ N 0 120 240 SCALE IN FEET ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET C3=1 0 z O Fm U Fm N z 0 U 0� LL Fm 0 z } a z J W w am z 0 U Fm cl) z O U O LL Fm 0 Q Z J W Q.' am 9 e CENTER I//LLERD o---------- a f f EXISTING ROW (TYP)- PROPOSED ROW (TYP) _- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----15'PARKINGSETBACK— I I -------- ------------------------------ __---__—___-------------------------------------------------� ;�-------------- 40' BUILDING SETBACK -- PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP) ' ::�TAINING WALL 32. 1' I I I BUILDING A I FIFE = 934_Z RETAINING WALL / LFE = 923 i l RETAINING WALL I I i I l o ® FU RE/KME T� Y + ��S I_ — — RETAINING WALL (TYP) J -1 10 14 1 Q' N 10' 13 M j0 ACCESSIBLE PARKING MARKING (TYP) J� 4" WIDE WHITE SOLID STALL (TYP) .d . 16' / / RETATININ 40.34' ' ' 1 II PROPOSED WALL 242411 j(oo RIGI RDE 117111 s RETAINING WALL REJAINIDJG FENCE (TYP) 16.03' . 5` 20' TYP '' + 5' 7' '+ co / � O :v O M M � / � I L 5 •f-f-f-f f-f-f-f-� •f �f %��% MEN • ;ffff ffffl .;ffff; • I � I � � ,••f••f•• /• • .fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff,.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•.•.,.,.•. ■-f-f-f--f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-fff-f-f• • • ff-ffff-.-f-f-f-•-f-f-f-•-f-f-f-•-f-f-f-•-f-f-f-•-f-f-f-•-f-f' ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•ff•• ', � • :•:❖:•❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:•:•:•:•:•:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:� •i-i-i-i-i-i-ii �/ / • • ••�i�i�iffffffffffff•fff•fff ffff•fff•fff•ff••••••••f•f•f•fff•••••••f••ff••••••ffffff.DWHO! ffff•fff...f•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•f........ff•fffffffffff•ff•......f•f.f•......f•f.f•f..•f• f f f f f f••• f•• f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f••••••• f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f••••••• f•• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f•• f f•• f l f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f• f f f• f f•• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f•• f f f f• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f •fffffffffffffffffffffff•ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•f• • •••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f•••f••••ff••fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fl ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•ff f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•ff..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f. -- - f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f•• f f••• f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• f f f• .fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff...•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f..•f.. •.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••ff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff. .—.—•-1 •—•—•—•—•—•—• fff-a 401 ■-f-f-� � � • •—•—•—•—•—•—• � � � f-f-f-a ■-f-f � � P• •—•—•—•—•—•—• � Pf-f-f-f-a ■-f-f-� P� � •—•—•—•—•—•—• � � f-f-f-fa ■-f-f-� f � • f-f-a •• f••• 1 •• f •• f f•• f••• f• 1 1•• f f•• f f•• f f ■•• f••• 1 I f f f• f f f• f f f• f••• f• 1 1•• f f f• f f f• f f f f 4-f•f- • f-� ■-f-f-i-f-f-f-i 1 f f f-f-•-fa 1 •f-f-•-f-f-f-� ■-i-f-f-f-i-f-� ►-f-f-•-f-f-f� •f-•-f-f-•-f-� ■-f-f-i-f-f-f-i 1-f-f-f-f-•-fa •f-f-•-f-f-f� ■-f-ff-f-f-f-� 1-f-••ff-f-f� ••-f-f-f-f-f-� ■ f fi�i 1 f f f f-•-fa .•••-.•• ••••••• ••••••a .•••••• ••••••• ••••••a .•••••• ••••••• ••••••a .•••••• ••••••• ••••••a .•••••• ••••••• ••••••a •fff••. ■••f•••1 Ifff•ff ••fff•� ■f•••f•1 1••fff• •ff•ff� ■••f••fl Ifff•ff f•fff•� ■f•••f•1 If••••• fff•ff� ■••f•••1 Ifff•ff ■ff••f-� f••ff•f fff•••a ■••ff•f fff•• • f••ff•a ■•f••ff f•f •fff•fa .•••••• ••••••• ff••••a .•••••• ••••• • •ff••fa 4-f-.-fbb-.-.-.-f-f-f-fb-f-f-.-.-.-.bb-f-fb-fa '.-fbb-f-f-.-.-.-•-fb-f- .-.-.-.-f-fbb-f-fa 'f-f-f-fbb-.-.-.-f-f-f--.-.-.-fbb-f-fba b-f-fbb-f-.-.-.-•-fbb-f-fb-.-.-.-.-.•ff-f-ffa � !.�fb-f-fb-.-.-.-fb-f-fb .-.-.-.-f-f-f-f-f-fa .�•,•�•�f�•,•�•�f,•�.�•�f,.�•�•�f,•�•�•�f�•,•�•�f�f�. .�•�f�•,•�•�f,•�•�•�f,•�•�• •�f�•,•�•�f�•,•�f•� .•f�•�•�f�•,•�•�f�•�•�•�• ■�•�•�•�•,•,•�•�•,�.••••••••••••f•••••••f•••••••f•••••••f•••ff•••••ff�-•-••,•�•�•,•,•�•�•�•�•�•�• •�•�•�•�•,•,•�•�•,� ■ff•ff• ••ffff•••a ■•fff•f,. i, it i i. i . i i.iii i�ffffff•a ■•f•fff• iii ii ii i i �fffffa ■••ff••f•••f•••�•••f••••••a ■•f••f• •fff••1 fff•ff ff•ff••f• ••ff•f iff••fff• ff••ff�•ff•ff f•fff•fff•fff.f.�•ffff•••• •ff•fff fff•ff offTOWNHOUSE -f•� ■•�- • • -f-� ��,•,�,1717 = WR_�. -f • ff-fb f-f-f• ■-f-f-f • f-f-f-� ■-�-fb ... _ a � i • • • ff�f� i • ffa 40.34' I I I o I I a � I °° O U) I cn w Q II Q a I I I'I I I III II I I I I I I I I I II I x I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 34.4' I x I I I I I I RETAINING WALL 9 it x x II i I � II \\ \ \\ FUTURE AMENITY 5' \\ \ \\ x \ PROPOSED LANDSCAPE \\ \\ MONUMENT LOCATION x \\ \ CONCRETE WALK (TYP) R181.67' I1 R176.67 \ \\ \ \ 11 111�11 0 R3, 0 611 11 /11 1 \\ \ \ 1111111111 1111 111 111 \ \ 11 1 1 or N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 00 \ \ 111 1 .. �, v v 1111 //• 111. o p oti , I1 j" Pt 11 / �,.. I Q �e��1,,111 / / � • tzoJ'111 i / o, . 1 / 11 / / • .:z PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 0 0 CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK :❖•••••••••••••❖: :❖•••••••••••••❖: :•:••?::�•••�•••❖: •••••••••••••❖: :❖•••••••••••••❖: :❖••••••••f••••❖: :❖••••••f••••••❖: :❖••ff•••••ff❖: ❖••f•••••••f•• •••••••f••••❖: ' ' :0 10'UTILITY EASEMENTS ■no SCALE IN FEET NAM q IN lktTlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE DRAWN BY DWG /TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C3=1 I /.:7 i i a CENTER I//LLERD ' EXISTING ROW (TYP) ---� -- h PROPOSED ROW (TYP) / TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __ 15' PARKING SETBACK — — ------------ -----------------� — — ——/. �.sr -— — — — — — — — — — — ------------------------------- ---- 40'BUILDINGSETBACK ►wwwwwwwwww• . . . . ® � ��•w • iw iwiw�wiwi iwi iw�iw�iw�iw�iw�iw�iw•w- • w� iw�iw�iw�i• •wwwww www • • • w•w� � w•w • ► •w•w•w•w•i wwww• w 4�• w•w�•ww•wwi ••wwwww' �•ww•w ••w•• I � � I w• •ww� • • • i www�www� �•��•w �•��•. •w ww•� • iwiwiwi� % �i��w w��i�•� �� iw� • w • • • ♦ • • • • w iw�iw�iw•i�� •w•w•w•� �••w•• wwwww I I•�••iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw•iw •ww•ww•iw•' "All •,�•i �J •ice wiwiwiwi iw�i��� w��iw�� - - � • .. • wwwwwww� �•�w•w �•w�•w, w•ww • • 1 ww•f www. • • • • • • wwwwwww� ►� wi•� � wiii•� ��� �����— � ��—� iii w��i w�w�w�w� �•�y� wwwww• I � � wwy www wwww � • � •• • � I I '� - � •w� w•w•w•w� 4�•w� � ' •i�•i�� I �w�• �•ii iwiwiwi� i�•i�• %ice• v `� `. �••w ww•. •w•w•w•. �w•iw•i w•iw•i I � iwii i��� wiwiwiwi ►iw�• �•w�•� .�•w •w�•, •••• .www • wwww, �ww www w�w�wiwi •�ww�w • w�ww�w I www ww�� ywwwww� w�yw• wwy�� �y ww�� ww•. �ww•ww• 10111141�w• w•w•� �•w •w •wwwwwwi . ww ww ww w •••• •w•w I 'I www • w•w•w•w� . • •w � �w • • wwwww�w� w��w•� yw • �w�w�wi� �•iw•i w•iw•i ,® I �•iw iw wwww w• w••••w ww••w, I I ►w•w • • www . •w •w •w •w •� wwwwwww� yw�•w w��ww� �ww� �� w w• w•w••w •wwww• I I ••• • �® wiwiwiwi i��i��i�•ww•�w•ww•i�•iw�iw�i i��i i �•�•�•�� �%•i�•i�•i�•yi�•i�•%•ice' I I �i�• �• www . �� ww ww ww w� ww ww ww w� ww w� w� w� ww ww w� w� • •iwiwiwi �!i:!i:!i:!i:!i:!iti:!i:!i ���� ���--�������---- 'iw�i��i�iiw�iw�i��i��i��i wwwwwww� I —� I •.�w��w� w� w� w� w� w �w-- w�w�w�w�- wwwwwww� wwwwwww� wwww•w•� wwwwwww� � �-� ✓ � ��_ wwww•w•� wwwwwww� •w•w•w•. I I � wwwwwww� wwwwwww• •w•w•w•i wwwwwww� I � •, •w•w•w•i ►wwwwwwwwww. I ►wwww• ll ►w�wwwww�!•� •www-. ►wwww - _----- I I ► I I I I \ \ \ FUTURE AMENITY 5 \ \ \ /'' / / 5 x / �/ / `-\ o \\ \ �\ PROPOSED LOT LINE (TYP)0001* 00, / \ x tol / w / R181.67' \ \ 11111111111 � 11111111 \ \ 111111111)��e��o^111111 \\ \\ \\ 1111111)Qo�o`�� i 1111111 �' �► / Ft3 �s�, 230j, \\ /� / .,•: B��'' � , Rap i R5 / / �' , B•B `� �> Q- C3 111 OfOf OF 1 �111111i1,11t>11 1 �t 11 ppOSED ,A RcpRD9 04111 �11.�111j1�111�11 �� �' / I � / 2;34. P � ' 1- / / [Al #;Z&:, a PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL I DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK O 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET ILISM I'livil architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C3=12 z O Fm U Fm N z 0 U 0� LL Fm 0 z } a z J W w am z 0 U H cl) z O U O LL Fm 0 z Q z J W Q.' am \ "000�� 6,5+ 0 ,P Z rco o oe ti^ i . • . • • • • ••-•-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-•-f-f-•-•-•-f-• •-•f-•-•-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-•-f-f-f-•-•-•-f-•-f-•-f-•-•-•-f-•-f-•-f-•-f-f-f-•-•-f f-•-f f-f-•-•-f-f- FA ffff•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. �` PAVEMENT DESCRIPTION .ffffff fff�•� .�f�•�f� f�f�f� i Iffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff•�• �f�f•�•�•�•f• �ff�fffffffffffffffff•�•�f�•�•�•�f�•ff�•ff�•ff�• ��•f•�•ff�•ff�•ff�•ff�•ff�•�•�•���•ff ����•f• �fi�ifi�i�i�• • wifif��ififif��ififif��ififif��i�i�if��i�i�if��i�i�if��i�ifif��i�ifif��i�ifif��i�ifif��i�ifif���fififi��fififi��fififi��fififi��fififi��fi�ifi��fi�ifi��fi�ifi��fi�if%��•, ��f�•ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff� - - BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT .•-�••••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff••ff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•fff•ff• • • • • • • • ••�f�f_f_•�f�•�f�•_f_•�f�•�f�•�f�•�f_•_f�•_f_•�f�•�f • • • • • ••�f_•�f�•�f�•�f�•�f�•_f_•�f�•�f_•_f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f • • • • • • f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f_f_f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f_f_f�f�f� ------------------ fETE PAVEMENT �-f-f-1 •-f-f-� .-f-f-1 •-f-f-� •-f-f-� •-f-f- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••-r.-.-rr.-. ��••••1 .•••P�•-.-rr.-.-r. �•••••1 .••••�•-r.-.-rrr..•••P�•-.-rrr.-r. 1 .•• • � 1 i 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 �f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�•�f�f�f�f�f�f� � O �f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�•�f�f�f�f�f�f1 �f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�•�•�•�f�f�f�f� �•�•�•�•�•�•�.�.�.�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�r�.�.�.�•�•�•�•�• ' �• EXISTING .ffffff• •ffffffff1 .fffffffff •••••••••••••••••••1 .ffffffffff •••••••••••••• .ffffffffffff •••• •f• •f• • • .• •. .. .1 .•TOWNHOUSETOWNHOUSE •!•ff• •ffffff• •f•�.�. .�.�fff •fffff�fff�• fff.�. •!•ff� •fffff•�• •�• •••• •f•�•f•�•f•�• •�•�.�. .�•��� �•�• •�•� �•�• •�•f ���� f�•� .off ���� ��•� ���� .�•� f��� ��•� �•�i .��� ���� ��• 4- HYDRANT • 1`• •' , , 1`• •' , , , 1`• •' ZZ— _ _ _ WILKINSON WA' _ — + — i / --___— — 10' UTILITY EASEMENTS i -� r----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- � �----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ ------ ------ ----- I I I I I I �w ias 0 iailna F j / -1 IF I I I i I I I I I W I I I L1 1131 L2 1131 w TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE I o TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE I FIFE = 916.6 I I FFE = 918_9 cn FG — 1. I I FIFE = 924.8 15' REAR SETBACK I _ iL-------------------------------------------------J L-------------------------------------� L-----------------------------------J L--------------------- / SWALE (TYP) L-- RETAINING WALL D° RETAINING WALL / /y 7 0 --- 0 I'll ell WET 1111 j 1�11 / /\ 0 W \ / I1I111111111111111�111�11111 � � � �' E � / 11111�1jj1111111111jj111111j11 30 WETLAND BUFFER / 1111 j111 1111111�1 1 11 • '� I 1� � � �111 111 11111 1�11111111111 \ 111�111111111111 1111111111111jj11 1111�11111�1111111111 11 \ �', i 1�111111111111111111111, EXISTING MANAGE 2 WETLAND 1 111�111 �� \ 0 \ I 0 0 f if\ \ 0 y 0 / /0 ',Ooe WE-- f y \ \ # \ — 13M 1 i 4 f / # # / f y i 4i / # CONCRETE WALK 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET lkiTlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C3=1 3 :❖: • / ` .❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.•. co .. .. ..TOWNHOUSE.. we ❖: ❖ ❖i i❖ ❖i i❖ ❖i i❖ ❖: � • �• . / �••••••• •••• JIM TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TYP) rmteM PROPOSED ROW (TYP) L LL7 WILKINSON WAY man pop Im pop 1011 TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE / .••yyb•••• •�••�••� r-------�—r-------r� �� - ----�—r-------ram—r-------�—r------_� �r-------�—r-------r •• •• • ♦ •• •• •• • ❖•••••i•••••••❖i i❖•••••••••••••❖i ❖•••••••••••••❖i i❖•••••••••••••❖i • • 1 • ••%:•%:•••• •••••• •• •• •• •• O i•:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:•i � i•:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖ 924.7 :❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖: ��:�•:; •:••:•• •••:••:• � i�:�:�:�:�:�:�-----�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�-----,ice:�:�:�:�:�i i�:�:�:�:�:�:�-----�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�-----,ice:�:�:�:�:� •%:%%:•�:•::•%:•::%::• •:•%:•• , ;%:;% ;%:;%i �i is � • : 60 o / � � � / 11 11�11�111111111111 � � 11 llll llll �11 � � az / / / 111111111jj11111111111111111 \ / 1 111111 1111 / / 11 111111 1j111111t1111 t1 1j111111111 / / o 111 11 111 11 W � � 11 111 111 1 I1 �11 / 11111t111111t1�111ttt1111ttt1111 1111 � w � �' / / 1 I111111111111t11 1 111tt1 1ltttllltt / 1111 llll 1111 1111 1�11 �111 1111 11 � � � I1 1�1111 1111 11 �111 t1 11 t1111 / 1�11 1�1 1 11111 111111 11111 �1111 11111 1111�1 1 � / 1111 1111�1 11 111 11111 1l 111 11111 / / / o 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 � / 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1111 1l 1 1�11 l�11 1111 111 111 11 111 1 11 1111 111 1 1111 1111 11 111 � � tl t1 t1 �1 t1 ttl t�1 �11 ttll 1l1 t111 ll1 11 1111 1l1 1 1111 1111 l 11 t1111 / llttl111 t1 ttllll t1�111 tt1111 111 �11 t11111 _ 11 �1111 t1111 I111 1111 1111 �111 111 111�1 111 111111111111111111111 111111�11 ltll ltll 1l �111 lttl 1�11 ltll 11 t tltll 1t111 tt111 11t111 ltll�1 �11111 tt1111 t11111 1 111 t111111t1111 1t 1 t1111 t�111 t1111 1 11 1111 11�1 1111 11 111�1 1�111 1111 11�1 I�11 �1 11 1111 11�1 1111 1111 1111 1111 1�11 1111 1 111 1111 111 11 11�1 1111 1111 ll 1 �111 tlllltttlll �111 ttt lltttlllltttlllltttlllltttlll 1t11111 t11111 11 tttl 11t111 11t111 11t111 It1111 tt1111 t1111 t111111t1111 1t1 1 tl�1lttt11111tt1111tt11111t111 11�11111t 11 11 11 11 1�1 111 11 �11 1111 11 11 11 1111 1111 1111 1�11 1111 1111 111 �1 11111 11111 11111 11111 111 1 1�111 / \ 1111 1111 1111 1111 1 1111 11�111 1111 11111 t11111 t1111 IPROP i�, till 11111 �1111 11111 111 11 1111 1111 1111 �111 111 l�11 \ \ 111111jj1�11�1jj11111jj111111j1111111 �11 111�11111111111�11111j�111111 NOSED BASIN 11t1111 11111 t1111 1111 t 111111111�11111j1j11111j111111j1111111j111 jj1111�1l1 till t�11 llll 1111 �111 11 111 111 100 y - 904.50 11111 11111 1111 111 11 1111 1111 11 111 111 111 1 11 / \ 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 R 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 t1111 11�11 11111 11111 11111 11411 ,��11 HWL = 11 111 1111 111 11 111 �1t 111 11�1 1111 111 1 �11 < 909.08 11�1 1111 1111 1111 1�11 11�1 1111 1111 1�11 �111 11 1111 11 t1l�11 t1�111111jj1111jjj111111jj11 1jj11 111 1111 �1111 1c� 1j�11 11�11 11jj11 11�111 11jj11 111j�1 11j11111t1jj1 11111 I t 1 1111jj1111t1t1 / 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 / \ 1t1�111�1t1111111jlllllt111111t11111tt1111tt11111t1tt111t11111t11111III 111I111111111111till111�11111tt11111 t11111t1111t1tt1 \ � 1 111111 111�11111111111�11�11 1111111j1111111111�1�111111�1�111�1111�1 1 tllll�11111�1 / \ � ____ � � t1l t111111j1j1111111111111 1111 j1111 jjj11 jjj11 11 1 j�11 111 / 11 11 11 11 11 111 a � � 11111111 j1 j���j j1 j1��1t 1111 ��lllll�t It 111 111���111 jlllll // / r \ tt1�1l�111j1j1111111 11j1j1111j11 tt / // � , � \ 1111 11�1 11111 1 BENCHMARK HYDRANT / / ` T \ / inn ,nlrTi nan ni irrrn o / / # f / f f tl �VFT EXISTING MANAGE 2 WETLAND w,Er � air N / f f / fNN PAVEMENT LEGEND DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK O 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET I Ikkylyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C3=14 Attachment 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Existing Land Use PID #34-31-22-43-0006 Southwest Parcel PID #34-31-22-44-0001 Northwest Parcel PID#34-31-22-44-0008 Middle Parcel PID #35-31-22-33-0002 East Parcel Total Gross Area (acres) 15.21 15.13 19.96 25.59 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.21 0.00 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.41 0.00 0.93 0.52 0.00 0.00 36.68 0.00 4.12 2.09 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 3.19 1.57 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 Other (UPA Powerline Easement) 0.00 Other (Commercial) 0.00 Net Area (acres) 0.00 3.07 9.10 20.83 33.00 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Signature Gateway Required Net Density 4.0to6.0upa 4.0to6.0upa 6.0to8.0upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 12 55 167 234 High 0 18 73 208 300 High + Signature Gateway -Max 15 0 18 73 312 404 Proposed # Housing Units 340 Gross Density (units/acre) 4.48 Net Density (units/acre) 10.30 NORTH OAKS FARM_ S INC 34-31-2243-0008 � ,ply ROGALLA, SARA R GG� Sp,/ - ��_ -. 6063ASH ST T /i hi i k _ _ --- - - � �- 34-31-22-34-0006 WEB NORTH OAKS FARMS INC�'1'j 34-31-22-43-0010 HANSOM, SCOTTB 34-31-22-34-0005 i / i t/ �---.-.-.-LLLM - - - ----------------- 1 f bVET --------------- Q I w LANZKENTC Q & JEANNINEA O Q 1579ASHST. o 34-31-22-41-0006 Q o Who Oho o - SANDER, LOWEL J MALLMAN, KELSEYM HALL, LAWRENCEIYYY CERONSKY, CAROLY�VM WOODSTROM, JERRYA COUMTYOFAMO T 1957ASH ST. 1565ASH ST. 1573ASH ST. 1591 ASH ST. M Q Z Q 6909CENTR/lLL '- 0001 34-31-22-41-0008 34-31-22-41-0004 34-31-22-41-0005 34 3122 410001 - D. 35-31-22-32-0004 m � M -== ARTERIAL ROW 1 HIGH DENSITY PID #35-31-22-33-0002 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 34-31-22-44-0006 MEDIUM DENSITY PID #34-31-22-44-0008 A PID #34-31-22-44-0001 AKS FARMS lN� WILKINSON LAKE � ' � ��' � 34-0001 �;� f PID #34-31-22-43-0006 ,� EXISTING CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RAMSEY COUNTY Legend Permanent Rural Civic and Institutional Urban Reserve Parks and Open Space Low Density Residential ro Private Airfield L Low Density Mixed Residential = Right -of -Way Medium Density Residential n Open Water High Density Residential �_ - _ Municipal Boundary Planned Residential / Commercial Parcels Office Residential Streams Signature Gateway District - Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CEN TER VIL L E RD 35-31-22-34-0006 A SIGNATURE GATEWAY ELECTRICAL EASEMENT --------------------- . . . . . . . . . . DONLINAMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLERD 35-31-22-33-0005 COUNTYOFANOKA 1697ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION POINT ir*6 0 150 300 N SCALE IN FEET CPArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 03/10/2025 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 ISGlnc.com Attachment 5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Proposed Land Use PID #34-31-22-43-0006 Southwest Parcel PID #34-31-22-44-0001 Northwest Parcel PID#34-31-22-44-0008 Middle Parcel PID #35-31-22-33-0002 East Parcel Total Gross Area (acres) 15.21 15.13 19.96 25.59 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.21 12.06 0.00 9.41 0.00 0.00 36.68 0.00 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.93 3.19 4.12 Other (UPA Powerline Easement) 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 1.57 2.09 Other (Commercial) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Area (acres) 0.00 3.07 9.10 20.83 33.00 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Signature Gateway Signature Gateway Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 12 73 167 252 LANZKENT C & JEANNINEA 1579ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0006 L SANDER, LOWEL J MALLMAN, KELSEYM HALL, LAWRENCEIYYY CERONSKY, CAROLY�VM ST 1957ASH ST. 1565ASH ST. 1573ASH ST. t2-0001 34-31-22-41-0008 34-31-22-41-0004 34-31-22-41-0005 - _10HL-L I High 0 18 91 208 318 =_ V High + Signature Gateway -Max 15 0 18 137 312 467OH OAKS Proposed # Housing Units 340 - - \`� \�� 3 -3� 2-44-0006RMS INC Gross Density (units/acre) 4.48 . _ Net Density (units/acre) 10.30 NORTH OAKS FARMS INC - 34-31-2243-008 MEDIUM DENSITY ,ply ROGALLA, SARA R GG� SO, 3� j�C-� - - / x----3�-� - - �- 6063ASHST 34-31-22-34-0006 �S' y�T �,' ' �� � � <> < mor- - _. - W. NORTH OAKS FARMS INP�11, . 34-31-22-43-0010 PID #34-31-22-44-0001 HANSON, SCOTTB 34-31-22-34-0005 4KSFARMSIN ;' ,WILKINSON LAKE 34-0001 PID #34-31-22-43-0006 /101 PROPOSED CITY OF LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RAMSEY COUN1 PID #34-31-22-44-0008 WOODSTROM, JERRYA 1591 ASH ST. 34-31-22-41-0001 Legend .".". Permanent Rural \ Civic and Institutional Urban Reserve Parks and Open Space i Low Density Residential \ Private Airfield " . . " " " . " " " Low Density Mixed Residential Right -of -Way . " "rn Medium Density Residential Open Water ' High Density Residential Municipal Boundary ' gHEL j Planned Residential / Commercial Parcels " " ------------------ w-----------------1 .1 - ------------------- � z t o I \ -- � Q OLLJ � O O p U O Q v mN �cZN cZN mZN �ZN COUNTYOFANO 61010ENTERVILLI D. M L M m 35-31-22-32-0004 \ arm,"I" loll ARTERIAL ROW I - - ET � PID #35-31-22-33-0002 \ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTER VILLERD 35-31-22-34-0006 1 -aet ------' 1 ---- \ DONLINAMY T H 6100 CENTERVILLERD \ 35-31-22-33-0005 Or- \ I 11�►�1 COUNTYOFANOKA 1697ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 SIGNATURE GATEWAY SANITARY SEWER EON LECTRICAL EASEMENT POINT **6 0 150 300 N SCALE IN FEET I Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning { WILKINSON WATERS DEVELOPMENT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA - 03/10/2025 ISG PROJECT NO. 24-30671 ISGlnc.com Attachment 6. Land Use & Density Plan I NDIVI DUAL PARCEL I MPERVOUS COVERAGE TABLE Parcel Land Use Impervious Coverage (Sq Ft.) Lot Sze (Sq Ft.) Percent Coverage L1 131 Fbsident ial 11,770 30,510 38.6% L1 B2 Fesi dent i al 11,402 24,310 46.9% L1 B3 Fesi dent i al 11,402 24,310 46.9% L1 134 Residential 11,402 24,608 46.3% L1 B5 Fesidential 11,402 27,818 41.0% L1 B2 Fesi dent ial 10,890 22,744 47.9% L2 B2 Fesi dent ial 10,974 18,239 60.2% L3 132 Fesi dent ial 10,974 18,239 60.2% L4 E32 Residential 10, 974 18,239 60.2% L5 132 Fesident ial 10,974 18,239 60.2% L6 132 Fesi dent i al 231,199 405,180 57.1 % Outlot D Fesi dent ial 74, 099 171,814 43.1 % Outlot E Commercial 102,222 224,862 45.5% Outlot F Fesidential - 180,0731 0.0% Outlot G Public - 1,802,353 0.0% AGGREGATE I MPERVI OUS COVERAGE TABLE Land Use Impervious Coverage (Sq Ft.) Total Plat Area Percent Coverage Fbsidential 417,462 984,323 42.4% Commercial 102,222 224,862 45.5% ROW 291,852 291,852 100. 0% Public - 1,802,353 0.0% Total 811,536 3,303,390 HMAN SR, � D ASH ST 1 22-42-0004 BACHMAN SR, WARREN D 8 A 1467ASH ST. 34-31-22-42-0005 NOTE: THIS TABLE IS THE SUM OF ALL TABULATED RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS AREA FROM THE TABLE ON THE LEFT. A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH IN REGARDS WITH THE ROW IS TAKEN ASSUMING THAT 100% OF THE ROW IS IMPERVIOUS WITH THIS APPROACH IT CAN BE FOUND THAT THE AGGREGATE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE IS BELOW THE RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE THRESHOLD OF 35%. WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THE FLEXIBILITY FOR IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT BE CONSIDERED BASED OFF OF THE ENTIRETY OF THE PLATTED AREA AND NOT BASED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL SUBDIVIDED PARCEL. PLEASE NOTE THAT OUTLOT D AND OUTLOT E ARE NOT THE FINAL PLAN ALIGNMENTS BUT A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT OF THOSE PARCELS, HOWEVER EVEN IF THE ENTIRE PARCEL AREA WAS INCLUDED IN THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE COLUMN THE AGGREGATE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE WOULD STILL BE BELOW THE 35% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE THRESHOLD. .� 1000, SHORELAND OVERLAY �LKENSONI CRAN ALL SANDER, LOWEL ✓ MALLMAN, KELSEYM / HALL, LAWRENCEM 1509AS(/ ST 1557ASH ST. 1565ASH ST 34-312- 2- 0001 134-31-22-41-0008 / 34-3122-41-0004 NOTE: PER SHORELAND OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE SHALL BE 35% FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND 60% FOR COMMERCIAL USES. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTING A FLEXIBILITY TO BURNS, KEVIN 34-31-22-43-0012 ` \� CONSIDER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA BASED ON THE . . . . . . - - `� SHEAREN, WILL/AMR NORTH OAKS FARMS/NC AGGREGATE AREA OF THE ENTIRE PLATTED LAND. THIS 34-3122-43-0013 / �� \ 34-31-22-44-0006, IS SHOWN IN THE ADJACENT TABLE. �W. . . . . . . . . . . - ! - - ................. - \- � - /� / - NORTH OAKS FARMS INC _ \ _ _ . . _ - - 34-31-22434. . - f - 4LLA, SARAR ASHST ------------- -- 22-34-0006 i�/T� . . . . F A. /Y 1NE� / � - . . . . - OUTLOT G NORTH OAKS FARMS /NCI�tij. 34-31-22-43-0010 HANSON, SCOTTB 34-31-22-34-0005 I I / I / / / 'TH OAKS FARMS INC 1-22-34-0001 % ; /' /' - - - . . . - . WILKINSON LAKE SOIL BORINGS: BRAUN INTERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE S. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 952-995-2000 LA KE LANZKENIC 8 JEANNINEA 1579A" T. 34-3122- 0e8,P CERONSKY, CAROL YN M -9 O O p 1573 ASH ST. �� o 34-31-22-41-0005 - - - - - - - ......................................................................... . . . . . . . . . . NORTH OAKS FARMS /NC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0430223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PID #34-31-22-43-0006 Southwest Parcel PID #34-31-22-44-0001 Northwest Parcel Middle Parcel PID#34-31-22-44-0008 PID #35-31-22-33-0002 New Signature Gateway Parcel Total Gross Area (acres) 15.21 15.13 0.00 45.55 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.21 12.06 0.00 9.41 36.68 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 3.07 0.00 0.81 3.88 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.12 4.12 Other (UPA Powerline Easement) 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 2.09 Other (Commercial) 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.90 4.90 Net Area (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.22 24.22 Guided Land Use Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Signature Gateway Signature Gateway Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required Range # Housing Units Total Low 0 0 0 194 194 High 0 0 0 242 242 High + Signature Gateway -Max 15 0 0 0 363 363 Proposed # Housing Units 340 Gross Density (units/acre) 4.48 Net Density (units/acre) 14.04 SITE DATA TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 340 APARTMENTS: 200 SENIOR LIVING: 100 TOWNHOMES: 40 SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA: 75.9 AC TOTAL R.O.W. AREA: 6.4 AC RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA: 21.9 AC COMMERCIAL LOT AREA: 4.9 AC TOTAL PUBLIC WATER AREA: 36.7 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: 3.9 AC EASEMENT AREA 2.1 AC I I I I I G WETLANDS: KJOLHAUG ENVRIONMENTAL SERVICES 2500 SHADYWOOD RD SUITE 130 MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 952-401-8757 W W V Q Z o p zt WOODSTROM, JER W Z Z Z 1591ASHST. OQ� WQ 34-31-22-41-0001 13 o � O o M ��M �M L1 B1 OL1 L2 B1 11 L3 B1 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 L4 B1 L5 B1 VVI 0 Q �s pp U po m Z N Q Z i Q �2 COUNTYOFANOK 6101 CENTERI//LL D � 35-31-22-32-0004 L5 B2 v OUTLOT D �o °WILKIA 2 \ LAKE nllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL LLD PRESBYTER/AN HOMES OFNORTHOAKS INC 5919 CENTER VILLE RD / 043022210019 A AJEL IA 1 OUTLOT E GALLOP TRt 6102 CENTS 35-31-22-34- LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION AREA MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING 3.8 AC COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 4.9 AC SENIOR LIVING BUILDING 1.0 AC PRIVATE ROADWAY 4.2 AC PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 3.9 AC PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 11.1 AC LAKE (NWL) 16.7 AC STORM PONDS 1.8 AC WETLANDS (REMAINING) 20.0 AC PUBLIC ROW (ARTERIAL) 4.1 AC PUBLIC ROW (DEVELOPMENT) 2.3 AC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 2.1 AC EASEMENT COUNTY OFANOKA 1697ASH ST 35-31-22-33-0004 N 0 150 300 SCALE IN FEET architecture + design group SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE I DESCRIPTION BY 3/20/2025 1 TABLE AND CALCULATION REVISIONS I TJW PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-LAND USE DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE LAND USE & DENSITY PLAN SHEET AO=12 z O FM U 7 FM N z 0 U O LL FM 0 z J W a Z 0 O LL FM 0 z J W Q.' a Attachment 7. Housing Goals per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The vision statement, as described in Chapter 1, defines what Lino Lakes should look like in the future. The goals and policies guide the Housing Plan to help achieve that vision for housing development. The goals and policies that follow were established in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reaffirmed as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan process. Goal 1: Improve availability of affordable and life -cycle housing. Policies: a. Work with developers to identify innovative strategies for providing entry-level and life cycle housing. b. Use redevelopment tools to revitalize aging residential properties, made possible by various federal, state, local government, and non-profit programs. c. Provide expanded opportunities for housing ownership made available by various federal, state, local government and non-profit agencies. d. Provide for and designate appropriate areas for high -density development. e. Strive to integrate affordable housing in all residential land use districts. Goal 2: Enhance opportunities for senior housing. Policies: a. Develop partnerships with non-profit and private sector groups who assist in the creation of senior housing. b. Coordinate development of housing with retail accessibility (restaurants, shops, groceries). Goal 3: Maintain existing housing stock to insure a high -quality environment in all residential neighborhoods. Policies: a. Promote the improvement of the existing housing stock, and to encourage the rehabilitation or redevelopment of substandard housing b. Encourage in -fill housing where appropriate. C I TNAWOF IN KES Goal 4: The City will consider all widely accepted housing tools, as appropriate on an individual basis, including: • Housing Bonds 1,2,3 • Tax Abatement 1,2 • Consolidated Request for Proposals from Minnesota Housing 1,2,3 • Site Assembly 1,2 • Livable Communities Act programs 1,2,3 • CDBG and HOME through Anoka County 1,2,3 • Adopting a Local Fair Housing Policy 1,2,3 • Participation in housing related organizations, partnerships, and initiatives 1,2,3 • Preservation of existing Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) units 1 • Community Land Trust 1,2,3 • Manufactured Home Park Preservation 1,3 • Tools that preserve private unsubsidized affordable housing (including but not limited to a local 4d program, tax incentives, etc.)1,3 1,2,3: Tools in this list will be considered for housing goals numbered elsewhere in the plan Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 4: Housing 4-2 Attachment 8. PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines and Shoreland Chart WILKINSON WATERS PUD Land Use, Conventional Zoning District Guidelines & Shoreland Regulations Sheets AO-16 Preliminary Plat dated February 10, 2025 Development Standards/Guidelines PUD Land Use Correlating Conventional Zoning District Housing Type or Use Lot Width (ft) Lot Depth (ft) Lot Size (sf) Medium Density Res R-2, Two Family Residential single family 60 125 7,500 R-2, Two Family Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 150 7,500 R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family (unit lot) 50 NA 7,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential max. 8 unit townhome (base) 100 NA 24,000 Signature Gateway R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family or max. 8 unit townhome 100 NA 24,000 R-4, High Density Residential townhome 150' NA 20,000 R-4, High Density Residential multi -family (base) 150a NA 20,000 R-4, High Density Residential senior living (base) 150' NA 20,000 NB, Neighborhood Business Commercial 100 NA 11,250 GB, General Business Commercial 100 NA 20,000 'Shoreland PUD requires 150ft wide lot width for townhomes and apartments Proposed Development Lot Width (ft) Lot Depth (ft) Lot Size (sf) PUD Flexibility Required? NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA- No development proposed in Medium Density area NA -no two-family proposed 142 NA 18,239 Yes 487 NA 9.3 acres No 750 NA 3.9 acres No NA -proposing GB guidelines 620 NA 1 5 acres I No 3/26/2025 City of Lino Lakes PUD Land Use -Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Wilkinson Waters PUD Concept Plan Attachment 9. Yield Plan tP = z WEL ✓ MALLMAN, KELSEYILI HALL, LAWRENCEM CERONSKY, CAROL YNM 1557ASHST1965ASHST1573ASHST7OO WOO o o hV o COUNTYOFANOKA 34-3122-41-0008 34-31-2241-0004 34-31-2241-0005 G SHST6101 CENTER/ILLERD"34-3122-41-0001 oOo Who 35-31-22-32-0004 ZQ� ` � Oo"' OoM OoM VIM A H T WEB r r r r - r - - - - - GARAGE (TYP.) �/ - 1 I S ORMWATER - GEMENT POND - f AP ROX = 0.6 ACRES r NORTH OAKS FARMS INC 00 r r 34-31-22-44-0006 L r �\ X SB- p 1> � ( I / \ o \w \ G r r ET, I r r r r r r r r r 9 � \ 9 t!N X SB- a I \ W f / o �. - ---r STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND \� APPROX = 0.45 ACRES NORTHOA A \ Q 2-44- \ �. STORM ATER 9 = ES - MS INC ---- _ -- -- _ r ------ IANAGE�EBA BOND , OAKS FAR r r r r r r r „--r - r_ r r r c 53122330002 APPRO \ NAP 3 r_ .� - \ - f --- -WET �- 13M � � \ ---------�------------- ��� ___ __---'-=-____ GARAGE (TYP.) \ 2 rVV"r \ r .\ 0 \\ \ r -ter, •! `�J4 \r I r r r r r \ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r `� •r 1�., - r r r r r C 0 \ \ B- � \ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r \\ Q \ STORMWAT R \ \ MANAGEMENT OND \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ APPROX = 0.8 A RES rrrr_\._rrrr\rrrrrrrrrr rrrr�rrrrr O \ I GARAGE (TYP.) \ r r r r r r Medium Density Southwest Medium Density Northwest High Density West Signature Gateway Eas t Total Gross Area (acres) 15.20 15.13 19.96 25.59 75.89 Wetlands & Water Bodies 15.20 12.06 9.41 0.00 36.67 Public Parks & Open Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arterial ROW 0.00 0.00 0.93 3.19 4.12 Easements 0.00 0.35 1.07 1.72 3.13 Commercial Net Area (acres) 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.00 8.5.5 0.00 20.69 0.00 31.97 Guided Per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Signature Gateway Total Required Net Density 4.0 to 6.0 upa 4.0 to 6.0 upa 6.0 to 8.0 upa 8.0-10.0 upa; max. 15 Required # Housing Units Low 0 11 51 165 228 High 0 16 68 310 395 DUA based on Units DUA-Low 4.00 6.00 8.00 7.12 DUA-High 6.00 8.00 15.00 12.36 Proposed # Housing Units 16 68 310 394 Proposed Gross Density (units/acre) 1.06 3.41 12.11 5.19 Proposed Net Density (units/acre) 1 1 5.86 1 7.95 1 14.99 1 12.32 r SB \\ I I \ r \ I \ APPROX. ORDINARY r y r HIGH WATER LEVEL 1 / 895.2 r r r r r r / ( r r I r rl r � r I I . I I 1 MANAGEMENT PO APPROX = 1.0 ACRE EX S13-st-13 M1 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06� 0 r °fihl \ r r r GALLOP TRUSTEE, DEBRA A 6102 CENTER VILLE RD 35-31-22-34-0006 GARAGE (TYP.) \\ \ EX -aet 2 ` \ � m 100 UNDERGROUND PARKING STALLS \ m \ DONL/N G \ 6100 CE �1 \ 35-31-2� (P \ \ \ \\ \ GARAGE (TYP.) Y \ 2 \\ N \ \ STORMWATER \ \MANAGEMENT POND APPROX = .2 ACRES \ \ STORMWATER \ \ \ MANAGEMENT POND \ \ \ \ APPROX = 0.2 ACRES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O M ° WILK/NSONLAKEEL 14D o �OCn = ,n IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I II LD < PRESBYTER/AN HOMES OFNORTH OAKS INC 9919CENTERVILLERD r O 043/0/22210019 M=Tm I � m %olkiTlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-SITE-YIELD DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. 03/10/25 - TITLE YIELD PLAN M 1 �\ Ak k AO=13 , on Attachment 10. Architectural Plans Q 0 0 LO N O N O Me 1 architecture + design group 211 11 th ave nw rochester, mn 55901 p. 507.206.6201 f. 507.206.4621 www.crwarchitecture.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 01 /19/2021 NUMBER DATE SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA NO. REVISIONS DATE PROJECT NO. 24-027 FILE NAME DRAWN BY Author DESIGNED BY Checker REVIEWED BY Checker ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 01/19/2021 CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-027 TITLE PROJECT IMAGERY AND MATERIALS SHEET A 0 J LLI d I J LLI d ENTRY ELEVATION 1 /16" = 1'-0" ROOF � 2' - 5 1 /4" V LEVEL 2'- 5 1 /4" LEVEL 2 50 1' - 2 5/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" 'ARKING 88, - 10" END ELEVATION AT GARAGE ENTRY 1 /16" = 1'-0" ROOF 132' - 5 1 /4" LEVEL 3 &-� 122' - 5 1 /4" V _LEVEL 2 111, - 2 5/8" LEVEL 1 � 100, - 0" {1Rf\11V V -88' - 10" architecture + design group 211 11 th ave nw rochester, mn 55901 p. 507.206.6201 f. 507.206.4621 www.crwarchitecture.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 01 /19/2021 NUMBER DATE 1 SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR 1 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT WILKINSON LINO LAKES WATERS MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 24-027 FILE NAME DRAWN BY Author DESIGNED BY Checker REVIEWED BY Checker ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 01/19/2021 CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-027 TITLE SHEET APARTMENT ELEVATIONS AA-20 J LU ry I J LU ry n Cl) N N Lr) Lf) N O N N i P I— W-- STREET & GREENWAY ELEVATION 1 / 16" = V-0" END ELEVATION @ PROPERTY LINE 1 /16" = 1'-0" ILI 1011 N F01 101 Ull 1711 11 11 MAIL_ 11 11 11 I;I�I� ,I� 11 ,; Il;:� li. FUll OF mmv- lim, NMI ''LJIIII -■_-'�'LJIII .,Rj TRIP, M mill, IRS III ROO 132' - 5 1 /4" LEVEL 122' - 5 1 /4" _ LEVEL 2 111' - 2 5/8" _ LEVEL 1 AL 100, - 0" PARKING 88' - 10" ROOF 132' - 5 1 /4" ell��m:1y/:lwc? co 122' - 5 1 /4" M LEVEL 2 111' - 2 5/8" LEVEL 1 100'-0" PARKING 88' - 10" architecture + design group 211 11 th ave nw rochester, mn 55901 p. 507.206.6201 f. 507.206.4621 www.crwarchitecture.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 01 /19/2021 NUMBER DATE SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT WILKINSON LINO LAKES WATERS MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 24-027 FILE NAME DRAWN BY Author DESIGNED BY Checker REVIEWED BY Checker ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 01/19/2021 CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-027 TITLE APARTMENT ELEVATIONS SHEET AA-21 n CD N N LO LO N O N 00 N Elevation 6 - a A-PUD 1 /8" = 1'-0" Elevation 7 - a A-PUD 1 /8" = 1'-0" Elevation 8 - a A-PUD 1 /8" = 1'-0" Elevation 9 - a A-PUD 1 /8" = 1'-0" architecture + design group 211 11 th ave nw rochester, mn 55901 p. 507.206.6201 f. 507.206.4621 www.crwarchitecture.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 01 /19/2021 NUMBER DATE 1 SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR 1 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT WILKINSON LINO LAKES WATERS MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 24-027 FILE NAME DRAWN BY Author DESIGNED BY Checker REVIEWED BY Checker ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 01/19/2021 CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-027 TITLE CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS SHEET AC-20 STREET ELEVATION @ TOWNHOUSES 1 /8" = 1'-0" END ELEVATION @ TOWN HOUSES 1 /8" = 1'-0" architecture + design group 211 11 th ave nw rochester, mn 55901 p. 507.206.6201 f. 507.206.4621 www.crwarchitecture.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA McCORMACK, AIA 21247 2/10/2025 NUMBER DATE 1 SHEET NOT VAILD UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR 1 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DULICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT TO WNHOMES Enter address here PROJECT NO. Project Number FILE NAME DRAWN BY Author Ell DESIGNED BY Checker REVIEWED BY Checker ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 2/10/2025 CLIENT PROJECT NO. Project Number TITLE TOWNHOUSE ELEVATION J LU ry I SHEET GREENWAY ELEVATION @ AT�20 TOWNHOUSES 1 /8" = 1'-0" Attachment 11. Preliminary Plat OHL — Me --+ 9 WILKINSON WATERS ADDITION LJ L, F_J I OHL— --OHL— —O _-------OHL——O�iL----- __ i•; • OHL ---- —---Nil----�HL•-----8qL-- y--g��--N89°32'07"E 560.69 T \t-S89°19'02"E 617.78 ---�-- _ EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (E1/2 SE1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, East of St. Paul Water Works, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That portion of Government Lot 5, Section 35, Township 31, Range 22 West, lying west of the Centerville Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The South 300 feet thereof, and except the North 170 feet of the South 470 feet of the East 870 feet thereof, that part of the West three-quarters of the South Half of the Southeast one -quarter (W 3/4 S 1/2 SE 1/4) Section 34, Township 31, Range 22 lying southeasterly of the presently existing Water Department right-of-way (meaning thereby the right-of-way easement for conduit purposes of the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners), Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section Thirty-four (34), Township Thirty-one (31) North, Range Twenty-two (22) West and also the South Four Hundred Seventy (470) feet of the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34); and also, except the East Two Hundred Ten (210) feet, all that part of the South Three Hundred (300) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of St. Paul Water Works right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying westerly of said right of way; and also all that part of the South Twenty-five (25) feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter (SE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of said Section Thirty-four (34) lying Easterly of the County Road, Anoka County, Minnesota. BASIS OF BEARING: The orientation of this bearing system is based on the east line of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Said line bears South 00 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East. -Gov't Lot 5 \ \ AREA TABLE: SE 1/4 - SE 1/4 606.65 i oi 409.32 - \ OVERALL SITE = 3,303,390 sq. ft. - 75.835 acres 33' adway Easement 1 \ ° Sec.34-T31-R22 S84°31'17"E - o y N S `lr 304.51 — — -4-90-2-1-07-.75- — _ 64° d�> \ EXISTING PROPERTY: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — g° 0° \ QO \ \ \ ZONED: R (Rural) (Per City of Lino Lakes City Code and Zoning Ordinances) Setbacks \\\ Building SETBACK-- / 0�c' cA i Right of Way Local or Minor Collector Street 30 feet Right of Way (Major Collector or Arterial Street 40 feet 20' LANDSCAPE �S >, g Y ( ) = 9 Y ( 1 ) _ LINE BUFFER �� \ NC \ Rear (Principal Building) = 30 feet Rear (Accessory Building) = 30 feet 39,,519 SQ FT 11 - \ \ \ \ \ J� 22744SQ T Side (Principal Building) = 10 feet Side (Accessory Building) = 5 feet 0.70AC 0°52ACI \ \ \ \ \ Parking - \ o \ Lots for non-residential uses: 15 feet from all lot lines 4MA,FIRM Floo�d\Zone� °2 Height Requirements ma Y ( � \\ o� _ \aximum Height = 40 feet (Except as allowed by City Code Section 1007.043(3) % FT V h=2.77/ \ rrr111 \ m ( (J ter✓ '0\ \\\ \\\ \ \ PROPOSED ZONING: \ Base Residential Zoning: Base Commercial Zoning: ° 0 R-4 SETBACKS PER ZONING: General Business Setbacks Zoning per 14,239 SQ FT \ \ \ P � � � I� \ N � � 24,3>0 SO FT \ � � 0,42AC � \ \ �\ \ \ \ From Street Right-of-way From Street Right-of-way ' �) ,'r 6'. \ �"• 0°56AC \gam \ \ \ Major Collector or arterial street - 40 feet Major Collector or arterial street - 40 feet Local or minor collector street - 30 feet Local or minor collector street - 30 feet �A, (� �r�� \ \ \ \ \ Parking lot - 15 feet Parking lot - 15 feet 405,180S47FT \ o Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet Requesting a flexibility to 5 feet wM, Lo o� \ \ , \\ 9.30AC \ \\ \\ \\ Rear lot line Rear lot line cn N I (� r' 1\�i 1 10)\ \ \ \ Principal Building - 30 feet Principal Building - 30 feet < `1 I- r Z \ 18,239 SO FT Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet / ✓ \ `O942AC\ N \\ \ -- Accessory building - 5 feet Accessory building - 5 feet _ 24319S47FT \ � \ Y^�I' \ \ ' o Parking lot - 5 feet Parking lot - 10 feet c co Flood Zone A - -- ,LO L) per FEMA FIRM map rn� /-- 0,56AC �' \ r `� Q �, \ \\ Side lot line Side lot line I I w cn / / \\ �� \� \\ �1 , i \\ \\\ \ Principal Building - 20 feet Principal Building - 30 feet Requesting a flexibility to 10 feet Requesting a flexibility to 15 feet a)_I \ \ 'r�``; \ \\ \\\\\ \ Accessory Building - 5 feet Accessory Building - 10 feet / --------______ �� ��, Parking lot - 5 feet Parking lot - 10 feet J y ` 18,239SOFT \ \ �� 1 i` \ \ \ \\ Zero lot line - Side yard setback requirements shall not be ---- --- f------- 42AC \ t9 0, _S86°1244"IN -__�- ` �� %` _ \\ A \ \� \\ y�Y,' \ \ \ \Q \ applied to a common wall of multi -family dwelling units Y \ - / 265.00i= --'- _ �g / \ \\ \\\� \ Building Height Flexibility: To be greater of 4 Stories or 55' from grade to mid -rake. P °1---- N_79°»7----- '1� i\ 24,698SOFT LO 0.56AC � \ 77 BENCHMARK: _ \ �� \ �1 \\ Onsite benchmark is top nut fire hydrant located along the westerly side of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard approximately 154 feet south of the southeast corner of the CONSERVATION -_ ?S 198,004S�FT--- -- I ° \ 0 -� i �'�• � � o \ C \ � � \ \ Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota - Elev = 919.06 feet. EASEMENT �n ---- \ 4,55AC ` Icn \ dD a! i i \ \ CJ \ - \ \\� Offsite benchmark is MnDot Geodetic Monument OTTER MNDT RESET - Elev = 941.081 feet. r /y� 66 Ii i1 \ 18,239 SO FT \ \ ° �=1 � \ \ \\0 \ Approximate OHW Line - o w` _ T ��I _ 8.42AC �aqz-Zp g5 i�� \ \ FLOOD ZONE: from others Z I - _ - w \ i I 1 , 60 �\ \� 3 / NGVD29 ( ) ACCESS AND 895.2 I �_ �' 20' LANDSCAPE �� \ \ The surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone A, according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27003C0365E, published by the \ I \ \ --- _-1 � 5 \ \ � � \� � � � \ \ � \ I UTILITY EASEMENT 11 v� / / BUFFER \ \\\\ \ Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015 and Flood Zone X, according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. �U, 27,818SQF L-1.33\ �. M / / \\ \ \� \ \\ 27003C0370E, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. I > ��� 964AC p= Ion I / /-T- / / / /� -T- !-- o� �S`5g2 E' 06 o cA \ ` k / l_/ NOTES: o =2°0 % Q �\ \ �,°// \\ \ �\ 1. This survey does not purport to show land ownership or all easements or encumbrances that affect the described property. �`\ o° \ /� / \ N \\\ 2. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are approximate, based on Gopher State One Call. Location of all utilities shown and plotted are based on visible surfac( ° / I I 11 p 2 \ �� �� �66�0, \ . \� identification, and/or drawings provided by utility companies contacted by the Gopher State One Call. Utility lines in street right-of-way are not necessarily N< \ I Z �3 \ ors 8�0) \ / / �' o. \ complete. Private utility lines, may not be located per the Gopher State One Call, available record drawings were used in preparing the location of these lines. m \ � � � / / \\ ca p Y� Y p p 9 P p 9 r 'f� I L0 \ oo-`so N21 °43'18"E SETBACK -' �, °\ Excavations were not made during the process of this survey to locate underground utilities and/or structures. Additional underground utilities and/or structures may be \\ Dye\\\ \\ I 0�/�O/'� J_.I 0N \ Rsr,,j��\30.80 u� SINE \\ \\ I \ M N \ � � encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Center for verification of utility type and field location, prior to excavation. °y4 I I 3,702 SO F>ai c9 \ \ I i o \ T� 7� \ 3. Survey work was completed on June 4, 2024. 0,08AC �i �� -' N 1 , 41 0UTL0T E �' Bituminous Surface Oy \ V �� ` C_ ch < S�- 224,862 SQ FT 2 1/2 crass Disc LEGEND m 6� �8 S6 1�2.g � d� 5,18AC �\ \ �\ • Iron Monument Found \ \ U) 8 O0, 8 201,11yf'S7 FT 4 �7°0 \ v\ \ \ °y< ease '� ��� �� _-I 49F Q62AC �7066, 0 \\ Concrete Surface = Indicates Ma Nail Found \ 9 .70 O Flood Zone A �_ ` d �2 �8 ' \ Indicates Cast Iron Monument Founi �` o�N\ c No?S?o8 I per FEMA FIRM map w ��� `�\ 7 067�' \\a O W "' Gravel Surface Indicates Concrete Stone "X" Found �Ni '% �;1Cl4) '\\ � � \ o PROPOSED SEWER \ \\Qs\ \AND WATER EASEMENT-- �� 32j J N 2�6� �`C��j\\ 0�TL�T \\ L'pS�'S \ ,�� i N72°0I26,E\ \ Doti 13 m �oS \\ ` \ \ SQ 00 .06'��\\ \ ,' 32.69��\\ \\ o-� ui w cn 6'° S8, 171,814 SQFT ,�----- ���0 `� 194AC \ 6560 \ N40°2007'E \ \� \ °y�yc SSSp \ \ \�`� \ \0S� \ \ i / 209.34 `� 23.40 `� N �� \ \ - i S89°1330'E ---__ 127.17 �� `�-------------------------— \ \ \ . / °� �' 7o1 Easement _ - _ _ � — 1 SE Corner I SW Corner A N89°1330'W --- > S. Line - i �- S. Line - Gov't Lot 5 �rD No. 252087 �`� \ 213.61 Sec. 34-31-22 OHL-----OHL-----bHL L-----OHL4 -- OHL---- I Sec. 34-T31-R22 I \� CIM I 'IOHL CIM /' --- L-----OHL-----04iL 0=M T'-----OHL -- —--=OHL----- I 476.T 7 �� T - - �o 65 .97 --—�9af867"€ ---- Q•Q6 77921 off- "2 � 3 y - - - 79' 37.62 I BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 63.34 ------- ------ - N 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET EM Electric Meter --- > --- Sanitary Sewer Line v0 Utility Vault — - - SAN - - - — - - >> - - — Sanitary Line from others Storm Sewer Line GM Gas Meter Ground Light - - - - STM - - Storm Line from others Light Pole USGSBrass Disc - - I - - — Water Line Transformer -- wnT— - Water Line from others p©ppp Utility Pedestal — - - SANE - - - Forcemain line from others -__—� Utility Pole/Guy Wire C. \\ _ _ -- — — WET— — - Wetland line from others ® Curb Stop \� G — - - G Underground Gas Line Hydrant \ -- - - uE - Underground Electric Line Water Valve \ \\ - - uTL - - Underground Utility Line Benchmark — - - FBO - - — Underground Fiber Optic Line Q Cleanout \ \---OHL--- Overhead Utility Line 0 Drop Intake Landscaping Edge O 0 Manhole/Catch Basin Field Edge ` ' 1\1 LS; Lift Station - — — w — — - Water's Edge MB Mailbox Treeline � Post 0 Deciduous Tree -� Sign Fo Utility Marker + Street Sign Soil Boring Coniferous Tree I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 11T:.T■1T►1A / 1'" 0'. DATE 2/10/25 LIC. NO.45817 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES 1�� REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. PROS. NO FILE NAME 30671 PPLAT DRAWN BY --- DESIGNED BY --- REVIEWED BY --- ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE --/--/-- CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET AO-16 1 Cf,_%0K1r% 7yo 712" fro Pipe v v o °y( \ v RLS 16113 \ \ \\\ \°y \ \ \ \�\°y4 \moo \ y( ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT , i Sri �i I I i I / A � �- S 1/4 Corner Sec. 34-31-22 Found CIM WILKINSON WATERS ADDITION 0=2 34 00 i \ j✓�� -' ACCESS AND Floo�one\ 4MA --- --5` �1 ` � FIRM map UTILITY EASEMENT `_2GJQ,AG �� E ui� 1— \\ W F Y ---------------------- ------------------ — --W / N VA Z _ ---- --- ��,� boy-- �� \-----------+ S8 °3144 r r /� � in,^I\-------T— -------------N------ 99��� 1,782,738SQFT , \c \ \ I-------------- - �Al - wFi 5.00-------26 a \ \ -� LO OA1o ?52I \ - CONSERVATION / "I // P� \ \ EASEMENT �n ----- f Approximate OHW Line -' o I w_ 0y4 \ \ \ \ from others Z r%� (��Y /✓ \ \ 895.2 (NGVD29) \ i�Dc Jl✓ I \\ oy�\ \\ \ \ \ 01-14\ \\ 7t \ < \ I \ � �Li \ \ I W a> \ I \ I o I \ I � I I I I I I I I I I I — 870 --- I I co o I II I I I I II I I S. Line - j S' I 1- Sec. 34-T31-R22 \ I Sec. 34-T3 Bituminous Surface Concrete Surface Gravel Surface — — — > — — — Sanitary Sewer Line Sanitary Line from others — — — » — — — Storm Sewer Line Storm Line from others -- I --- Water Line Water Line from others Forcemain line from others — — — WET— — — Wetland line from others — — G — — Underground Gas Line — — uE — — Underground Electric Line — — uTL — — Underground Utility Line — — — FBo — — — Underground Fiber Optic Line — — OHL — — Overhead Utility Line Landscaping Edge Field Edge — — — W — — — Water's Edge Treeline I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS • Iron Monument Found PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Indicates Mag Nail Found MINNESOTA. O Indicates Cast Iron Monument Found MARK A. SCHWANZ 38� Indicates Concrete Stone "X" Found 4� /t�k a EM Electric Meter DATE 2/10/25 LIC. NO.45817 0 Utility Vault THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, GM Gas Meter INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. Ground Light © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. Light Pole PROJECT Q Transformer A N O KA ❑F©m©❑T Utility Pedestal Utility Pole/Guy Wire HOLDINGS, L L C ® Curb Stop Hydrant pd Water Valve WILKINSON i(} Benchmark WATERS 4 Cleanout O Drop Intake LINO LAKES MN O 0 Manhole/Catch Basin REVISION SCHEDULE ��LS,- Lift Station DATE DESCRIPTION BY FM_B1 Mailbox Post —� Sign Street Sign Coniferous Tree Deciduous Tree PROJECT NO. PROD. NO Fo Utility Marker FILE NAME 30671 PPLAT Soil Boring DRAWN BY --- DESIGNED BY --- REVIEWED BY --- ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE --/--/-- 1 tl 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET AO=17 Attachment 12. Overall Civil and Landscape Plans I I I I ! , ! , ' '/r ! ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! ! , r r � ! r , \ + r r r ! �— WETC3 21 �— i i i i HL-----OHL-----OHL­---OHL-----qHL----17OHL-----OH -----OHL-----OHL-- - - - - - CENTERI//LLERD I ST 212 _- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - — - - - ST211—-------— — — — — — — — — — — — ------------- —�T �� '�g/, C3m22 JL ST-213 / / i /cw r/ I I I I MH-18 I i za ST 114A / IX x / .. ST-115 ,.:. MH-17 /... / ST-303 L J A.\ �.. /• i i ��'/ �``i ST-108 ST-113 , \ ST-302A ST-2 If /• v v / o / MH-16 \ \ i • / o — � / MH-13I I I I 1 1 U211 MH-12 ST-107 J ST 302 v ST-106A \ / \ MH 15 ./,� i /,•'� O ST-301 \\ r1ii111i; ;l±il' / \ J� 7771 ++n glltl+r i L / \ t '� C3m2 � / MH-10 , ,// � \\ !lll±±iirlilr+ r+t1+++r, S 6C3m24— / � / S�111 MH-8 \\ \ rrlrtlrJllt ' ,..;'�:,- � / i Q / \ tt,lll / FES 301 / / /--------------- r - r - � ST-110 - , I .. � ,li+ ��'� � ST-106 ---------- / ST.206 I I ST-209 ST-207 ST-208 '+'11� ' �� / 01 T-105A ST 402 ,:5 , FES-1 y I I I I I I I I J w I I I I 11 P GARDEN4iJ, L -r l / / \ST 205 I I I I 7 R° "W =szazz MH 7 I I I I oll :ES-401 J L i /// ��__ I I I I I I I I / / O / / // • __ ST-203A I I I I I I : ----- J ----- I - --- -- ----- - ---- ST-202A ----- _ - --- - - - -- - — — ST-102A -F7> 11 MI� I11 ---, ST-203 - --- --� ST 202 - --- --- - r-- --- -- --- --� r- --- - --- ST 102 ST 104 / ST-204 / / / I I T-------J I=--�t------- J I------ - _-__J L- ST 109 ST 101 // /� / // /I / / ST201 ES-201 FES-4 /,/— — // FES-109 P/ _ 0 7 � � t r771111+11 771 +1777 rl � / r /l � ! � ! ! W � \� +7711 Ill ttt1111111++17r111 trtl 77 � / 7711111771 ltrrl t�lll t���t ++�� 177 � � / / +1tt + 1tt11 tt ++ttt / '' + + / r111717+1J rttllll + 1111711117 trll Irtll rill r771111177 lllltr 7 lttlitllltttrJJl tr+ttlli' �� / / �� S-4A rl t+llgl ++±u ++rrl ++ur 1++ 111 / lltiiliriiiiirlttllllrlrirlllltrtrrlq+ rrrltlq � O IV � + / ++11 t + 117111117711 11,7 ++777 ++177 t+11 1 7 ++777 ++17 11117 +71 t 111777 1117 Jll 1J , 1111 / �� ' ! r / / / l+ +lltttt r+++17 111 11111 lttllllttllttt till rt 111 lltttt 11771 +1 111117111 +7771 +177 117 tlll lt�lll 111 ill +17 1J+11 t++11 +ll Ill +1 \ t +rl trll llllrrrlllt +rql rrrll r +trq tr +11 t 7 lr rll / O --- trill roll ++++t 7 � � ! , � / � \ 1ltllliiiili rri+lltttt 117 1ir11117i1rr711171t17 �+11ti71+11+17+r11111+rIt?PROPosEo± 11 FES-101 17+11111117i11tl+trlltttt+Jtttl�lltttllltllttl+lt7711111177J717 l+lrtJt It � / / ��� � � / / �� �J r / / rlrrll+llttttlllrtltrrll l+ttllllltr+rlll,,aora�w:�.,s 17 11 71 1111 1 tt +lltttt 1111 ill+It+tt+lull i+ll tr 11+1 � A o 4L \ / , ! ! + I \ // /� \ r1+11711rr1111717Ir+�t7771f+11r1771lllllttr1777 ttllttilllrtttl+lf 1+111tll+lll117111711771111111r777++111177111+1tt717771t1111171111111 t l +ll 11i +l+Jt lrgtt +tit t rrilill++r1 / / 1 tt +lll'{`rr 1+111717111 11+lltttt+t1t1++771, 1+++717 It+++IJJIt 777111111 It � lull +Jlll rtttt 1r11 +Jul +ttttrtril+ +Illll+++ilt / / / WWI \( J '0 tt +llltttq ++77 ++rtt lltttt 1JJJll+t+tlll +I777 +111 till 11111111 11111 rrJl 71 +llt / `Z` / 1+r 1+11 1111 771 77 ! -- 77111 till 111J17111 trill 1177 77 ++l�7 O llJJllll1+11111111111t++1J 1111111117+ ttlllJtrlllll // ! ! / \ If! ! mtrgllttll ++77 Q \ 1+11I1111771+1ftlJJlt+llllr / /O \\ 11 BENC MARK HYDRANT \0 i /// 0 Q 0 �� - ;t \ \\ / / / TNFH = 919.06 /// OCS-2 0& , \ / /. , ! ' ! ! FES-6 / r ! IF # If If IF + IF I VI/ C4 , IF r, ! /// ! r r r �� r / / If IF IF I IF 0 �2` 0�/ r � \ yz� + + /� /� r + + ! ' / // , �`�� SCALE IN FEET If L4, _1%w W11"Al architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. No. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-UTILITY-OVERALL DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE OVERALL UTILITY I PLAN SHEET C3=20 --OHL-----OHL a----OHL-----OHL-----OHL------L-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL---� -OHL ��---OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL/�- I i CENTER I//LLERD - O - O O / I I FBO-t----FBO- FBO---- -FBO -- __ ► L-----OHL�- i - -- o ----OH ---- - ---OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL----- - =G---G-----G-- G =_---G----G-----G- OHL-----OHL-- ---OHI --OHL---- OHL-----OHL----- ®� r�--- T HL-----OHL---- OH - --- -- --OHL- -- - - - - --- - - ___ ---OHL-- _-- -- --- - =�L -- - - -- - - --- - ---- ^ FAO---- rov- - - Ok'�- - - - rsaLFBD- - c>t%F�O- - - - TJfiLr$0�- --iTF�D-- - - FB9 - OHL---- - OHL- - --'- O �, -- NHL- O/O / - /___------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I I / / P-213 349'x 12" @ 0.50% -- - - - R=923.87 44 1f" 0 '55(r/o ST 212 1=916.03 ,, 'P R-92-212 ST-213 - - - /�/ 1=916.80 R=918.75 OZ� I i I CONSTRUCT SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES BUILDING A TO WITHIN 5' FIFE = 934 OF BUILDING - CONTINUATION TO BUILDING I I Z /q (a!=04.67 EX 24" CMP CULVERT �,' / / BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR LFE = 923 I I I I 00 I I Q mo 0 rJ/ ' / + o / / / 5 x 7-6 HYDRANTLL I I ILL BREAK=930.52 � - ' i i a 13 �v 8"x8 PVC TEE R PVC WATIERMAIN I I I 8"x450 PVC BEND 8"x45° PVC BEND 8"x6" PVC TEE O S / MH 19 SP-19 61'x 8" @ 2.00% o R=931.94 o M .. I=918.72 ia R=932.16 v=00 - 1=917.29 00 /2/ i / t'' 1 1>>.11�..11>> ST3(73) �js�> a 0 0 / 11 PROPOSED 1 R-932.99 �, / / 111 RAI Rey 1 + FDC CONNECTION 1=925.92 t ' 00 R HWL - 926.87 1 / t t � I I 11 t - 5"x T-6" HYDRANT ST-3 (72) R=928.90 v ST-210 BREAK=930.72 o aR=926.50R=929.48 � o I I=923.55 y / R=924.68 P 116 72'x 15" 1.02 /o 1=917.00 . i / 1=921.40 @ ° MH-17 8"x450 PVC BEND 1=914.34 i >> x. ° , R=928.73 A O/O / / t/V 'P'. o •:a., I=915.31 R 924.47 8x6PVC TEE � >> >> N 1=922.00 "" a R=928.23 sr� v 6 SAN STUB ST 303 rn I=920.46 >S� m �>> R=927.10 R=930.01 ��> '''+ moo o I=921.82 1=921.94 3 Q moo` 5"x 7' 6" HYDRANT Z /� i o /o i / - o '� BREAK=926.17 aU P-114100'x 24" @ 0.50% o5 ,03 Sag � 8"x8" PVC TEE, 8"x6" PVC TEE ST 114 ST-113 + o, >S- / ST-11 48 R=925.48 I 8"x45° PVC BEND MH-16 �0? I-916.35 1=915.65 R=926.52� 8"x6" PVC TEE o i� 8"x45° PVC BEND I I I I I I JG, 1=913.11 c o 6"x45° PVC BEND > > > > 6" SAN STUB x x x x •eee eeee - - •wee ♦ ♦ • .eee eeee eee . eee♦ ® � • , .eee eeee t� � • I- ® eee��, ,eee•♦ eeee eeeei • e� .•eee♦ ' .eee eeee • •��- eeee♦ •� - eeee eeee • , • � ♦eel♦ aeeee♦ � • ••••eeee eeeeee•� i��l� �♦•�ee�e�ee�•e�eec ��•e�e��1� .eee eeee �••• eee• t= 1 ••eeee•• eeeeeei ;� �,•eeyeee- .•eee• •eeee � . � % . �•ueeeeeeee- - ' � eeee eeee .� e, • •• .- ;eeee eeee; �;.;.;:;:; � I� � m •:;•:;e;!:; eeee eeee, ..... .•.e•.: '+. .eee eeee eeee• i : - - A eeee eeee. •eeee • 4beeee eeebeee� •eae-ese-e st ,��i`e•,�•,q ® I •eeee eeeeeeieieieiieiiieieieiieieii•�eieii•�•eieii•�i'�ieiiiiiiieiieieiiieiiiiieieiiiiiiiiiiieiiiiiiiieieieeiiiiiieiii � : eeee. • � i .eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee '+.eeri. • eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee • .eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee .eeee e e e e e e e e e e e e e e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee • e• eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee••��eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee � I' .ieieii=•ieiei•=•ieiei•=•ieiei•=•ieieiiieieiiieieiiieieii-�"ieiiieieiiieieiiieieiiieiei•=•ieieieiiieieiiieieiiieieiiieieiiieieiiieieiiieieii � \ `' / ,• '. eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i,eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• �e�e�e�e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ` eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee�e�e�e�. � � I, ' • .••eeee• • • : I • • • : I • � eeeeeeeee� ®j 1 - ee�eeeee eeeeeeeeeee� �- ; .••eeee• . • • . • • yeeeeeeee� • , • ee•�•e•� • ,, eeeeeee•�•� • � - .•eeeeee eeeeeeeee�e. • • � .eee eeee• eee• .eeee• eeee •eeee i .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee� ue•�•e•�•�•�•ee•1•eee•�•�•eee•�•eee••eee•�•eee•�•eee•�•eee•�•eee••eeee••eeee•�•�•�•eee•�•eee•�•eee•�•ee•�•�•�•�•eeee•�•e•�•a•�•�•eeeeee•�•�•�•e•�•e•�•eee•� u•••••a•••eee•••eee•••eee•••••e•••••••eee••••ee•••••ee•••••ee•••••e•••••eee•••eee•••eee•••••ee•••ee•••••••ee•••eee•••eee•••••eee••••ee•••••ee•••••ee•••••ee•••••ee� • . %• ee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee� ne eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee • eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee� ► eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i� eeeeeeeee•••e•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee•••eeee••eeeeeeeeeeeee••eeeeeeeeee•••eeee••eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•�._._. � •eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee , -� 1 : . 11'� � 1: � : . 1 1' � 1' � : • 1 1', � � � ' 1 11 • 1 ►• eee•. � � r � � � eeeee� ►eeeee•� � � r � � � eeeel eeee e•� � � r-�-�-� eeeee� ►eeeee•� � � r �i�e` eeeeee•� � � r � � � eeeee� • ei .��eeeeeeei i•�•�•�•�•�•�•i ►�eeeeeee�eee� •eee�eeeeeee�; i.�.�.�.�.�.�.i ►eeeeeeeeeeee� •eeeeeeeeeeee; i.�.�.�.�.�.�.i ►ee�eeeeeee�e� •e�eeeeeeeeee; i.�.�.�.�.�.�.i ► eee •e�eeeeeee�ee; i.�.�.�.�.�.�.i ►ee�eeeeeeeee� •eee• eeee, eeeeeeeee� ►eeeeeeeeee� .••••eeee••••, eeeeeeeeeeee� ►eeeeeeee•� •eeeeeeee, eeeeeeeee� ►eeeeeeee•� ••�•eeeeee, eeeeeeee� ►. • e•� •eeeeeeeeee� eeeeeeeeee� ►eeeeeeee•� 1•: : • 1 1'� . • • c eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeee ►�eeeeeee�eee� •eee�eeeeeee� e�eeeeeee�eeee� ►eeeeeeeeeeee� .••••••eeee•• eee�e�eeeeeeee� ►ee�eeeeeee�e� •e�eee�eeeeee eee�eeeeeee�ee� eee •e�eeeeeee�ee� eeeee75e�eeeeee� ►eeeeeeee�eee� • . •eeeeeeeeee� •••eeee ••eeee• .••eeee •••eeee ••eeee• .••eeee •••eeee ••eeee• .••eeee •••eeee e• .••eeee •••eeee ••eeee• • •�•, .eeeeeeee' _ --•eeeeeeeee�- --►eeeeee•• .•eeeeee'- --•eeeeeeeeeee�- --►eeeeee•• .••••••••eeee' _ --•eeeeeeee� _ --►eeeeee•• ••eeeeee' _ --eeeeeeee�_ _ ► • • eee ••eeeeee' _ --eeeeeeeeee� _ --►eeeeee•• �• .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee••eeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeee•.•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeee••.eeeeeee••eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•eeiee����ee• .eeee••eeeee•eeeeeeeeee•eeeeeeeeee•• eeeeeeeeee•ee�eeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee •ee••ee••ee••eeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• •••eeee••••••••••••••••••• • /, .eeeeeeeeeMe,,e_•eeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeeeeeeeee�e..eeeeeeeeee• .•••••••••••••e�eeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeee•••••e�ee•e�•••••••••• \ �� I•: � .eeeeeeeeeeeeeee• �a e• -•?e•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee� ►eu; eeee♦�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•.e,.•e �••a•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee• .•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeece!.e �c eeeeeeeeeeeeeee .eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee•• •e-ae .:,c- ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ♦ •' •eeeeeeeeeee��•_..eeeeeeeeeee• •eeeeeeeeeeeee.�e♦�eeeeeeeeeee• •eee••••••••••ee��e,aeeeeeeeeee• eeeeeeeeeeeeeee,• ,.••••eeee• •••eeee••••._• r,eeeeeee•• e e e e e e e e e e e e e e � eeee eeee `= ee � 1 • 1 � � • • 1 11 � eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee e•�e eeee e• • M •e ee •e ee •e ee •e ee •e • eeee • • •eee eee• • • •eee eee• • • •�e� eee• • e�e� •eweTOWNHOUSEee • ' • ee ee ee ee ee •• ee • ee ee•• •e • e� ee •e ee •e ee •e ee •e ee �� �j � 1 ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ♦ • • e e e• e e e• e e e e eee e e e e _ N eeee e e e A e e e e e e e e e e e -, eee .ee eee eee eee eee eee ■� � � eee eee • � eee ♦� �® 1 : • •�,11 •1 eeee aaec�:.•, eeee eeee •-��-e.����u eeee eeee u..sa..� • eee• eeee •aai c,i eee• eeee-�-.c�-e;.• eee• eee ••eeee eee eee • eee-e eee eee e►�aeec eee eee •e a=e�� eee eee a a eee i��e••• •••eee• eeee •eee��i i��eeee eee�eeeeeeeee eee•��i ���eee •••••eeee•••• eeee��i i��eeee eeeee�reeeee• eeee��� _ :�=eeee eee�eeeeeeeee eeee=�� ,1 Gr fee ee•�e�e�•ee eeee eeee eeee�•�•�eeee •eel fee �•e•�e�e�•ee eee• eeee eeee�e�e�eeee eeee eeee �•e•�e�e�•ee eee• i���yRr • . eeee eee• eeee eeee eeee eee• eeee eeee eeee fee• eeee eee• eeee eee• eeee eeee � eeee fee• eeee eee• • • 11 `=!1� 1 eeee eee• eeee eeee e��� eee• eeee eee• eeee eee• eeee eee• e�e� eeee eeee eeee eeee eee• eeee eeee - '1 ' 1 eeee eee• eeee eeee �ee�� eee• eeee eeee eeee eee• eeee eee• eeee eee• eeee eeee eeee eee• eeee eeee • eeee eeee eeee eeee •iie!-._ eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee ;eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee eeee '�•,.• ' • �: ••••••eeee ••••••eeee eeee•�eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee• •••••••eeee ••eeee,•••• •••••••eeee ••••••eeee• •••••••eeee ••••••eeee• •••••••eeee ••••••eeee• ••••••eeee• �eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee eeeeee.-eee ••••••eeee eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee ••••••eeee• •••••••eeee eeeeeeee�e• •••••••eeee ••••••eeee• ••••••eeee• ••••••eeee• •••••••eeee ••••••eeee• ••••••eeee• �eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee �eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee �eeeeeeeeee ••••••eeee / �•�e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�•• e��e�e�e�e���e�e�e�+� �♦�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�.�e• a♦�e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�� �♦�e�e�e�•�'�e�e�e�•• a♦�e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�e� � �♦�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e• a♦�e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�e� � ���e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�•• a♦�e�e�e�e�'�e�e�e�e� -�. C. � /, . _ON = � • 1 S-3A R=913.01 1=903.43 I R=915.00 1=906.75 -LP-20 162'x 30" @ .15% - 313'x 8" (ya 0 -_=111111151 o I - - ST-202 _ - - - - - L - R=917.95 1=904.68 ------ ------ ----- F------ ------ ----- I � I 12"x8" TEE 1-12"GV -1 -6"GV S - 393 x 8" @ 1. % 12"X8" TEE 0 GV eI® - - I 1- 8" GV P-102A 32'x 24" @ 1.00% r- I _<� ST P-103 55'x 24" @ 1.2 '/o i R=921.56 1=913.92 ST-102 S-4 r R=921.37 R=921.70 STUB-104A" 18 � \ 1=913.03 1=905.78 I - ( ) UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - - >> STORM DRAIN - - - > - - - SANITARY SEWER > - - - I I> - - - SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN I I> - - - I - - - WATER MAIN --- G --- GAS G - - OE - - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OE - - - UE - - - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UE - - UT - - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UT - - UTV - - UNDERGROUNDTV - - - OHL - - - OVERHEAD UTILITY - - UTL - - UNDERGROUND UTILITY - - - FBO - - - FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. -I%m w1�1, RAA architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-UTILITY DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE UTILITY PLAN 0 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C3=21 z O Fm U Fm N z 0 U 11113� LL Fm 0 z } a z J W w am z 0 U Fm cl) z O 0� O LL Fm 0 z Q z J W Q.' am OHL----- OHL----- OHL----- OHL-C� - - -- OHL----- OHL----- OHL----- OHL I � I I � • ,j -- +r�zw � 1 UTv - - OHL - - r UTV - - - UTI/ - S? // �� - ---UTV JS l l 0 I VTVT� CENTER I//LLERD I o -- - \_ - G ----- G ----- G - - G ----- G -- G ----- G ----- G ----- G ----- G - /-- _ --- - O Ip / H- - -----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL-----OHL----- -- - _ ---^HL------- _====C1klL�cxT�===C1H1FB0=---nul�----r,� ----- --- - _ ---_-- _-- - -- ----- ----- --- 50=--- rov - -- OHL ---_ OHL --- -- L OHi_ G--OHLC'---- G G i �ON� I - - � L - - - - - �lOHL QHlroy --�Fi*5.r60 dri4 - - -O, - -'T - - - �--SOH.L -- - 9k' ,H- -= OFiL - -ill - - - - -------- OHL - - - .,�„� t E R 3 .vGV 1=918.46 (UNKNOWN" UNKNOWN) SW HARD TU Stt PIP�� : EMF LIKE AT L12 E. T 12 1_9 / I=924 ) 01 (8 1G7 `O F/ �1 J8 R10 I / './cW ___________________________________ FUTURE INTERCONNECT VAULT FOR CONNECTION BETWEEN 8" CAPlik 98 .75 R=924.47 1=922.00 I I I I x x FUTURE STORM BY OTHERS JJ v v - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L Z.L WHITE BREAR TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. 1=919.14 of -� - - VAULT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH DEVELOPMENT, BUT - - - - - - - - T . 'I APPURTENCES WILL BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS IN THE FUTURE 1196X8„ 3n _ .SOo -EX T CC931.33 ( 15.19 (30" RCP) W \ - � � •- , ` / 1=915.29 (30" RCP) S - CAP 12" WATERMAIN STUB / �/, "� v / / v o? , / �'� / - CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER PROPOSED BUILDING 122 TEE / // / / -*x*` / �/ (VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH, AND LOCATION) FFE934.52 I 2 12" GV / PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN - - / /!' / / i-----►--_ _ >- 12" 45° BEND � oz/l ------------------------------------ e V l I EX STM MH R=931.93 / /� •e" 1=925.08 (12" RCP) S STORM 1=924.92 (12" RCP) N STORM / 1914.21 (12" RCP) E SANITARY 1=914.12 (12" RCP) W SANITARY / C / /o/ Ex CB T/C=930.39 / 1=926.88 (12" RCP) E / FD' ST-108A R=925.85 12" 45' BEND 1=923.93 HYDRANT / .�� oy If Jl BREAK= 12"x6" TEE /.. 1 -12" GV / .. 1-6"GV �5 / / R=927.13 << /,. ,�Q / / / o \�1=921.00 ST-107 / / R=927.34 1=921.42 i • e ` � LL / l l l \� ST 106A ,��5°I° v STUB-6A R=919.48 P-106A 45'x 15" @ 1.00% ��8 �' / o / / SP-6A 70'x 6" @ 2.00% / ST 301 \ 1111111. (, , . , 1 12"x8" TEE R=924.89 \ \\ I f l if 1 f� 1�toe�'�o' 1. f 1 j i 1-12" GV \ If 5�.a11 / �� 1=921.00 \\ \ 1 f I f l J1oQo�o 9ti� 11111 f 1 �/ 1- 8 GV ST-106100, J 1 , � R=925.24 1� O / / o \\\ \\\ 11,1,111 f 1 �: �� I-918.83 v 1 5x7-6 HYDRANT U 8"x8" PVC TEE d'9 \\ r' S-6 o BREAK= / ; :< R=924.80 1=909.99 12"x6" TEE 00, FES-301 ��� 1 -12" GV ` / / ,'� -7 1=920.00 1- 6 GV °�o /°�o /' oz s� ST-402 �9 R=923.69 ' oQ°Qo ��� 1=919.16 OF P-106B 34 x 18 @ 0.50 /o or Of ST-401 R1==992183..5328 / v E B s s8 2P) S1=919.33 (1c R-920.00 / l 2 33'x 1 916.85 MH- 7 P-402 33 8 @ 0.25 /o ° P-105A 45'x 18" @ 1.00% � EX CB f 1111, 1 R=923.05 ST 105A ♦ / S 5 / / / / / T/C=923.58 111 1=907.73 R=923.03 R=923.01 / / / / - / / 1=910.19 (30" RCP) N PROS 4 I-916.48 1=907.70 / / 1=910.16 (30" RCP) E IN rm-a,p N 111 / �. 2 / / l RA 920 2z / ,100YRHWL=�1 1 f11 1111,E c t1� I1 v�� 12"x8" TEE �j f Q� 1-12"GV 61 1-8 / L �i ST-102A>v`L5°I° L / 6� R=921.61 g @ S 23 05 1=913.54 �d S�\�6 ° R=923.02 STUB 5A ' 1=915.84 1=908.92 6� G1-100 / ' ST-104 / P-103 55'x 24" @ 1.2 /o i R-921.56 ST-102 S-4 1=913.92 / R=21.3I--913.037 111 0510 STUB 104 781 \ / / / z/ / \EX T/CC921.43 / 1=909.79 (30" RCF) W 1=909.75 (30" RCP) E / / / / / / / v / EX STM MH R=928.61 I-912.23 (12" RCP) E SANITARY -912.21 (12" RCP) W SANITARY 1=922.41 (12" RCP) N STORM 1=921.46 (12" RCP) S STORM 1 UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - >> - - STORM DRAIN - - - > - - - SANITARY SEWER > - - - I I> - - - SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN I I> - - I - - - WATER MAIN --- G --- GAS G - - OE - - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OE - - - UE - - - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LIE - - UT - - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UT - - UTV - - UNDERGROUNDTV - - - OHL - - - OVERHEAD UTILITY - - UTL - - UNDERGROUND UTILITY - - - FBO - - - FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. \�1�A A architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS \ �\ LINO LAKES MINNESOTA \ REVISION SCHEDULE \ \ / DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-UTILITY DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE '�t UTILITY PLAN 0 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C3=22 z O Fm U Fm N z 0 U 0� LL Fm 0 } a z J W w am z H U Fm cl) z O U O LL Fm 0 Q Z J W Q.' am z z / BUILDING B 0 0 / / FFE = 934 / / LFE = 923 R=926.49 1=911.97 ST-207 ST-208 ST-209 ST 111 0 0 / '- R=911.35 --- - R=919.55 R=925.04 -------------------------- ----- -RETAINING WALL ----------- R=922.04 / 1=912.26 --------------------------------1=913.17 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1=914.19------- o -- / ' ° � ° ' ° ST-206 641 P-207153 x 18 @ 2.00 /o P-208142 x 18 @ 0.50 /o P-209142 x 18 @ 0.50 /o N -------------------------------------- r---------- �---------------------------------------- ---- R=912.00 1=908.10 / i i i i ST 110 / / R=924.25 Q 7= /////IiiIIIIIIII1Ii ��IiiIIIIlIIII1IiI / - 1�1_11 1�=11�_1191111111_1t13.1171��1 11_9 TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE 6F .5.4 FES-18-1 1=909.22 11_111 1111_1I11�,11�-111IIiIIIIII .;� 1111 11111111111_�'�11 1 -1 1 j-1- 10 ryC-j 12UG N ST-205 o R=911.68 co1=907.58 5"x 76" HYDRANT 5"x 7-6" HYDRANT YDRANT BREAK=913.52 BREAK=919.17 BREAK=923.39 aSTUB-3B R=914.98 J L-5x 76HL =904.09 12"x8" CROSS 1=909.12- - - - S2 1WATER SERVICE (TYP) 4"SANITARYSERVICE(TYP)1-12"GVQ S-3 R=917.95 R 9 SANITARY SEWER CAP 1- 8" GV R=915.35 1=907.26 1- 6" GV 1=902.75 SP-36 22'x 8@0.65% -3 'x 8"@ 65% A. vP�CWATER ST-204 P-2313'x 8" 0.6 % 12x6TEE 12< R=911.68 X @ .15% 1-12" GV 12"6"TEE - 1-12"GV o FES ST-202 1 6" GV/ 1=903.85 S-3A1=907.31 -3N 1-6"GV> LL . 1=908.98 1=903.43 --_____ R=915.00 R=917.95 v O I 1=906.75 I NI o f I p a I oo M M O cL N TOWTOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE NHOUSE TOWNHOUSE 22.5° BEND0/0,EXISTING 8" ST-201 WATERLINE °/ CONNECTTO q8"45o BEND W/ SAFL BAFFLE 8" 22.50 BEND EXISTING WATER TUBSEE DETAIL SHEET CO-26 --------------------------------- --------- 8'GV- ---- N R=915.91 1=903.24 o S=899.24 7018„@1.25% 1 1=898.38 EX SA -�5 / 0 CONNECT To EXISTING STUB CV 1=897.40 o °/°0 FES-201 EXISTING 8" SANITARY 1=905.66 SEWER LINE °-1-111 1� IiIIIIII1F1 - 111= 111E_1�191_�fI1 1S110-_1211..1_0_0WEr FES-4 =904.66/ 1 WE 0?5°llll 11 1_19 1�11_r1 11 �111._l1 1_1 1 °/j \ /�1 1/4-sol.so 1�11111 1=904.5011�11111111,1 °=s 1.82 0 XDO 018 Cp 0 �/z 0 0 00, \ 0 o%i f w4- ° UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - - >> - - STORM DRAIN - - - > - - - SANITARY SEWER > - - - I I> - - - SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN I I> - - - I - - - WATER MAIN --- G --- GAS G - - - OE - - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OE - - - UE - - - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UE - - - UT - - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UT - - UTV - - UNDERGROUNDTV - - - OHL - - - OVERHEAD UTILITY - - UTL - - UNDERGROUND UTILITY - - - FBO - - - FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. q IN lkiTlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-UTILITY DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE '�t UTILITY PLAN 0 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C3=23 ' 1=914.71 `� 6" WATER SERVICE PLUG \ 8" WATER SERVICE STUB SP-6A 70'x 6" @ 2.00% / / 12"x8" TEE ST-301 MH-15 ` 1�! j11 /' 1-12" GV R=925.33 R=924.89 `� 1111111 t t )' �o?tio Mil t 11 j` // 1=921.00 11 11 t I o`'OQ'ti°' 11111 r' a 1 - 8" GV MH 10 p / 1=910.91 00 111) pQ Q- !11 j 1 r ST-106 / R=926.49 o / R-925.24 Pa��>>,1j11 /: R 1-918.83 �� / / / z �t 1=911.97 ti° o� `� 5"x 7' 6" HYDRANT , S) g /63 N 8 x8 PVC TEE �`�f `� BREAK= ,' ; �;: Y S-6 X 8 cP, < < R=924.80 @ a J �� �� I1j11 <<1 1 ,'� 1=909.99 ST-209 ST-111 ---R1==922.0-- -R=925.04 ------- ----- - - ---------- _ _ _ �\ A, 12"x" TE LIE _,.. -Z913.17 ---------------------------I-914.19o // / O FES-301 1-12" GV -7 MH-8 109 / / 1 6" GV ' L oo r l l R=924.42 ` 1 1 !1�o g �\ ��o �\ /,' LL % / JQ ---------� r----------------------- ----, _----------------------------� s ST-402 11 � �a I 1=909.31 �y 111 0`'o`�ti° ` . / @� @� r / l / / I I � R=923.69 � 1 oQ ST-110 1^ I 1=919.16 �1 Q ' I Q I 1 1 P-106B 34x 18 @ R=924.25 1=913.79 I I ST-401 R=923.32 o ST-106B \ / o T/c_9 .68 P-40132'x 18" @ 0.25% 1=918.58 00 1-919.33 (12" P) S .iE TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE 1=916.85 P-105A 45'x 18"@1.00%�925,4 i i 4 P 402 33'x 18" MH-7 / / 11 R=923.05 0T-105A \ / S-5 I o I 1 1=919.00 111, 11 11 t, N i 11 1PR G � 1=907.73 /� R=923.03 R=923.01 8" WATER SERVICE STUB 1 41 1/ 1=916.48 - 1=90770 I N I 11 1,10o R"N`-9�p2211j1 „ '„ 8" WATER SERVICE PLUG x I I j,, ,�j1ll�t -1-1 v 12 x8 TEE �59 / I o 1 .1�1j1 11 1-12"GV �' / I M I ST-102B 1 �' �6 / / ° 5"x T-6" HYDRANT o i R=920.00 1- 8" GV BREAK=923.39 i a i 1=914.09 - L---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --� I I ------- 2A \ ----- 1" WATER SERVICE TYP - - - 4" SANITARY TYP ST-10N,� P 102B 35 x 24 @ 1.00 /o R=921.61 a 6 �0 / / i # < .. ,.. ;'s S L� 1=915.84 908.92 1913.54� � Q�� o / v 12 PVC WATER o / / // < < 12'I TEE S 393 x 8" @ 1. % < - - - - 1 -12" GV - ST 104 -- I I ----- ------ - I 1-- 6" GV P-11 03S5T5-'x10224"@1.2 S R=921.56 i/ 1=913.92 / E7 T/x CB P-102A 32x 24" @ 1.00% -4 o 921.43 R=921.37 =921.70 STUB-104A 1909.79�30RCF) ---------- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1-913.03 I-905.78 1=914.1718 = " I I I I I I I I i o f •`` O I I I I I v v �] Q`_ ch °r I I o / / EX a I I l / EX \ ZJ � T. R=919.88 /1=914.75 (12" RIC S 3/9oTOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE / / / EX CB \ / T/C=919.33 1-908.50 (30" RCP)SIN =908.49 (30' RCP) E \ STUB-101A / // / / / / \ \ / \ ` , I=9 (18" RCP) S I I I EXISTING 8 I LINE CONNECT TO WATERLINE i ST-109 ( / /\ / PRO OSED STGRMWI �XISTING WATER STUB i i WI SAFL BAFFLE / // / �RE SE IRRIGATVI ELL/ \ a 1 - 8" GV _ I SEE DETAIL SHEET CO-26 \/ ATERMAIN ST-101 I I -----_-__� I R=920.60 �;pIA �O --- 1=902.45 W/ SAFL BAFFLE EXISTING 8 \ // / / / / / 1 / \ o X 8"@ / 25� L -°' 1 _ Ex sA _ SUMP=898.45 SEE DETAIL SHEET CO 26 WATERLINE / -�-R-9a2a4l _ o---- R=917.1500 _ _ N SUMP=901.41 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB / _ - ' - - _ _ _ _ 1=897.40 - o I _ / xjt �A- / / / j111tjjjljll / // ®A 0 FES-201 EXISTING 8 SANITARY _/j \ \ 1 Excs -- _ > - _ - - _ t / / / t 1�111�11111 j11111t111111 / o 0853a'RCP)S 1=905.66 SEWER LINE _ I - - I / / / I j 11 11 11=907.03 (30" RCP) NE / FES 109 11 0 / /,� 1111 - -- _ - > -1�1 / / 1 j j jj111t11111�11111 t 1111t j11 / t� FES 4 i j jl j 1 / 1=902.00 - - - 4.s5� . / / 1 � 111 1111 � 1 11 11111 1 / o \ \ C 1=904.66 / 11 _ / 111 1111 11 j I11 / tljj j111t 1 •`�111 11 1111 11 I1 1 1j 11 I11 P,�66X / 11 11�1 1111 1�11 1111 1111 11 11 �111 I11 11 I111 11 �11 / / � 111 11 �1 11 I1 11 11 I11 1 � / 1 jt111 t1111 1 1 111t11 11j1 j1111 � / / � i i �> �25°° 1111 I111 11111 I1111 � 1111 11111 j� 111 11111 1 / �11 I1 I t 11 1 1 j / 11 FES 4A 11j1 1111 111i �111 IIt1 1�11 11t1 tj1 j 1�11 jt11j 11 �11 1�111 �111 111j t1 / ' ' 11 j1t1j 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 I11 1 11111 111t1 1 1 11111 I1jIt 11j1 1111 I11 / 0 / \ \ / / j 11111 11=904.5011j Ij1j Ij11 11�1 1111 1�11 111j Ij�1 Ijlt 1111 1 1j1111 11 11 Illljt �11j 1 1�11 11�1 11111 1 1jlt I11j / / i / / 111111 Ijtlll " 111111 111111 111�11 11111j 11111 11 11111 11�11j j11111 111�11 �111 1 11�11j 1t 11�1 11111 111 1j1 11111 �11�1 11111 !j�1 111 / �` \ \ / i 1111jj 1 1111t 11111 11111 11�11 jlllj 11111 Ij 11 111 FES-101 111 111�1 11�111 11 111111�1111j11111 11 11j1�11111�11111j11111111111111 11111111 / 0c \ / ' ` 111111�1111jI111t1j111 IIIIIII11111111111111j111111111111�1ljlllllllll111IP 1 1=902.00 :1111Mill 1,1111111111tI�11111t(111111 t 1111t 11�11j I11j11 I11t11111jIt 1 111111 \ �' / / i \ Ij1 111 Ij1 �11 Ij�1 Ijlt 1111 1111j 11111 1 ROPOSEp 111j 1111�111111111111111I11 111j11111j11111ttj�111tj 1�11jt 1111 11�1t 11 / / ��\ \ � / / � \ 111111 I11111 111111111111 lljlll 11 jlj lIj�11 Ijjtll jjlll 1j' - 90BASIN 11 1 11 1 1�11 tlll 11111 I11j �1111 1111 11111111 / / r / 11 11 11 11 11 11 I j I j NWT _ �1 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 \ ' 11 �1 I1 Ij 11 1 11 50 11111t 111111 1�11 111t 111111111�Itj11111�1�111�1j11111j11111t1111 tj111�11 �` / i // �� \ \ 11�11111111111�11�111111111111j111j111111�1111 1 jj 100 YR HW 1111�1I11�111111t �111t 11�11 j1111jjj111tIj11�11�1111111t�1111111 7 909 �11 I11 111 ljjj Ij11 1 1j �1 Ij 1 1 t 11 11 i / 1111 1111111 j111111 j111111111111 j11111111 `1111 < <<I11 j . O8 j1111 1�111 j1111 1�111 �1111 11111 1 j111 1�111 jt111 11111 1�111 1 / / & `` 11 11 11 11 11 I1 11 11 11 11 1 / o i/N/ � IIj11111111j11111111111111111111111j1 1111 111111111111j11111jllllljll�1111jj1j11jjjlllj1j11111jjjjll tlljjjj11j111 j111�1�111111�11 j 111��jl j���lll jljl j11111�111 1jtltjtll�1111jI1111jj1111jtljjjljj11jj1j�1�1jjj1jlj�Iltl���jIt Itjjjjl //Q �� � / i � � �-- 1111�111jj1111�1111 j111111j11 IIt1111j11111 1 / / / oz�, I1111j -6A 11 t 1 I j 1 11I1 It 1 / 1=902.50 lilt j 1 t 11111 t 111111 �1 BENCHMARK HYDRANT _ r � \ �d 1 1 / / / 0 ���� � \ \ \ °& & TNFH = 919.06 1� 900 \ / / OCS-2 \ M\ ✓ / / / / 0 R_908.00 i / W E� FES-6 1=900.70 fl if I 4 tl W 9 wFT / / / / O� / \ 0& / d" ° / 0& \ / O� ~ &/ / f o / O�y I // UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - - >> STORM DRAIN - - - > - - - SANITARY SEWER > - - - I I> - - - SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN I I> - - I - - - WATER MAIN --- G --- GAS G - - OE - - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OE - - - UE - - - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UE - - UT - - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UT - - UTV - - UNDERGROUNDTV - - - OHL - - - OVERHEAD UTILITY - - UTL - - UNDERGROUND UTILITY - - - FBO - - - FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 0 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET i r I� I , 1A A architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. No. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA I REVISION SCHEDULE I DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C3-UTILITY DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE UTILITY PLAN SHEET C3=24 z O Fm U Fm N z 0 U 0� LL Fm 0 z } a z J W w am z H U Fm cl) z O U O LL Fm 0 z >m z J W Q.' am 13 19 15 13 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 100 Y R H W L = 922 . 1 6 23 32 11 23 11 6 10 12 11 6 19 11 X X X 13 4 9 1410 1413 6 10 14 9 13 5 9 5 13 14 WILKINSON WAY XX X X 5 11 X X X X X PROPOSED RAIN GARDE N 4 100 YR HWL = 920.22 PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 3 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 0 . 4 8 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN 5 100 YR HWL = 926.87 W PR O P O S E D RA I N G A R D E N 2 10 0 Y R H W L = 92 4 . 0 1 WILK I N S O N W A Y PROPOSED B A S I N 1 NWL = 904.50100 YR HWL = 909.08 BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 G U U FO FO U FO FO U UFO MB OH L V OH L OHL OHL V OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL G G G G G G G G G G G FB O FB O FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO FBO EX SB-st EX SB-aet U EX SB-st9 EX SB-st5 EX SB-st3 EX SB- EX SB- EX GGV GG UTV UTV UTV FBO FB O G UTV OH L OH L OH L OH L G G G OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHL OHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHLOHL EX SB-st-13 U U G U U U G U G U OH L OH L OHL OH L OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OHL OHL OHL OHL OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L OH L V G G W I L K I N S O N L A K E B L V D CENTERVILLE RD AS H S T R E E T W W W W W W E T WET WET WET WE T WET <II <II <II <II <II II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WET WE T WE T W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET WET WE T WET WE T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EM LS Ea s e m e n t pe r D o c . N o . 2 5 2 0 8 7 >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <II <I I <II <I I <II <II <II <II <II > > >> > > > > > > > > > 900 898 902 904 906 908 920 918 922 924 910 902 904 906 908 9 2 0 918 926 928 930 924 926 928 9 1 2 9 2 2 9 2 4 924 924 92 2 9 1 6 91 8 1.47 m p h Fas t e s t L i n e E n t r y S p e e d t o o l a r g e Sou t h L e g ( S o u t h ) Wes t L e g ( W e s t ) Nor t h L e g ( N o r t h ) Ash / C e n t e r v i l l e R o u n d a b o u t > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I IIIII I I I I I I I > > > >> > > > >>>>>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> I I I I I I I I I 920914916918922 924 900 910 896898 902 904 906 908 91291 2912 920914 916 918 922 92 2 924 924 92 0 9 2 2 9 2 4 9 2 6 900 91 0 896 8 9 8 8 9 8 902 906 902 91 0 916 918 932 910 904 900898 902 908 908 906 910906908912 91 4 9 1 0 91 6 92 0 9 2 2 9 2 4 9 2 0 91 6 924 922 924 9 2 6 92 8 924 926926 922 920 924 92 0 926 91 4 92 0 92 6 920 922 924 926 920 916 922 924 924 30671 C4-GRADING-OVERALL DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : \\ I S G F I L E 1 \ S H A R E D \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 0 6 0 0 - 3 0 6 9 9 \ 3 0 6 7 1 L I N O L A K E S D E V E L O P M E N T M A S T E R P - L I N O L A K E S M N \ 3 0 6 7 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ 3 0 6 7 1 C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A N \ 3 0 6 7 1 C 4 - G R A D I N G - O V E R A L L . D W G S A V E D B Y : DA Y T O N . G O N Y E A WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. - 24-30671 03/10/25 C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN 300 30671 C4-10 MINNESOTALINO LAKES 0 SCALE IN FEET ##### DWG/TW DWG/TW JDF/TW WILKINSON WATERS ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY 3/10/2025 E-39500 EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) C4-13 C4-11 C4-12 C4-14 ISG C� C� REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY c LL PROJECT NO. 24-30671 c FILE NAME 30671 C4-GRADING DRAWN BY DWG/TW z DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 >m CLIENT PROJECT NO. - m i i I I I / 0 — urn \ I UTV - - OHL----- OHL----- OHL - ---944L0-- OHL- CENTERVILL RD OHL----- OHL---- -OHL -- _OHL--- �1 GRADING LEGEND 101 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) 101 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) ++ ++++ x EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION A PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �0 PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION ���� PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (TIW) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) -X•X%� SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. It k Tlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C4-GRADING DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE GRADING PLAN 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C4=12 \ di� �oo/ oo b�bN�oN�6 Sh,S6 � s� �/ l ( 929.00 TIW b I I 926.63 \ 92.00 BohBUIEDING B F 9.0% 15.5LFE = 923 ExSB sMH-1 �s R=926.4 928.00TIW 926.031 / g255L 923.00 BIW EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) o 9;�00 /l - - - - - -- -- - - --- --------- -� ---- g2oQQ--------------------� ------ gZD, Q� ----- ---- ------ -- °�------ ���yo ---- col rz / PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) - - oo� - - ------ 9tig�� �� --- ----- ooh ��o ---- g19------ ����� o`O� 921 922 o�oti �o`' N _ 924�oh boo ' '--------------- ----------- --, --------------- �'� `L' o0, - I I I I I I O� TOWNHOUS �� TOWNHOUSE i TOWN USE TOWNHOUSE FFF �1$..7 F�� _ �.- -1 �?3.6 -H \II /0/ / co I I \ 5. V FES-1 / d a, z /R=910.53 910 921 925 ---- _TICS--T9-2\ 9-2-0 - ----- - ----___----- I2g 2_2_ - ----- ---------- - I924 I I 9_ u 1 01- ST J I 9L1 I 923 - 03 918T.92014.9 917 922° --- -- \--- ------ --- -- -- — — // l pl -91,, `91j `9� > ��' ��O e,`lF o,`L`L < 923 f ME ST-204 S 3A _>> — \ S 2 o/� T/C=911.68 ! 3 R=913.01 S_3 — — — — R-920.90 — — \ // FES-1A / 9� R=915.35• - _ \ ST-202 R-910.29 / 914 ST-203 - T/C=917.95 - — — — — — \ — o -- % T/C=915.00 - - - - \ 9\ --- ---- - - - - ------1-- -- ---920-- -! - - - - - - - - - i i -- - - 9 3- --- -- --�- - V --- OD 915 1 I 918 I I o °,`s1' iis 16.2 9\24 ol9,��916 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TI TOWNHOUSE TOWNHOUSE OWNHUSE F-��-0,1�� ' 01 r rrc -" 1') i -7Is I I dip ^n -27.1% I I I I �`91 I`9� I `99 sr�. \ \ B6, i •8o i •�� •�� i 6'� I rrsr � Q� � $r � �'rr / � I I I � c'� � c•� �� 'c9� �- I I o�O 918- / 8?y 30" WETLAND BD UFFER ���� o,�� o o \ \ ST-201 \ L 91 912.19 R=915.91 a R 17.94 Cb 909— cm :717- � \ � � EXISTING FLOODPLAIN �ET� _C -\ /` \ .� �\ � -\ FES-201 g09 � 906 � � / FES-4A / I \ 90� - \ PER FEMA WE �sp2 \ R=909.14 N R=907.98 1 � 0 �' \— '�' \ \ � 905�� -Il 11 M soy _ FIE \ - 904 - 906 Z R=908.14 / /I 1 1 1111 _ / i !9 11 \ _ EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND / 903 \ / �9 1 111 30' WETLAND BUFFER \\\ o t 1 902 CN 06 O/p I /o/ 0 30' WETLAND BUFER OIF7A /y 0// i f / 899 30 EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND / \ — 13M WILKINSON LAKE OHWL f ^ ELEV. 895.2 GRADING LEGEND 101 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) 101 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) ++++ x EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �0 PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) -X•X% SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C4-GRADING DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE GRADING PLAN 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C4=1 3 ra WA zid ifs 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ., , �. . �� 1-•-•--•-•-•--•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-0-� ,yiiii-i• •iiyiii•, .yiiiyfi•, ►•iiyiii� •iiiiyi•, .•iiyiii•, ►yyiiyy� ' ,:. • �f '••i••i•••!y!•i• , • . .411, /ffiA ------------------ Jr Lill ••iiiiii===; ;:==•iiiiiiiiiif i•r� . f `;'I fiiiiiii•===; ` •. �==-•••iiiiiiii� if � f ` Lj .iiiiiiii•===; `� � // \ i::i• ::i::.• •:� •• •• •• •• TOWNHOUSE•• • • • .� TOWNHqUSE •ii i••• �i•• ••i• •if �•i• •i•• ••i• •ii � •iliili •• •��i he OAF* uPiS MEW .-f-f-•-•-•-f •) .�•-•-•-i-•-•-•-i-•-• .-•-•-i-•-•-•-•-f-•-• !•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-• .•iiiiiiiiii 1'� ` . •iii ••i--i� • 1" r�• •, '' ',: Ida ., - - �'i>.�- \ • ® • 1 •i••• •••-•!i �`t �■� � � �� �� � � (��� lei �i� � / � � - • ,������! •������iL` � � a -D y r�� ■� _r�� ■� •• •i•- �Oi-ii•• is •: !: is is ��.. , �� • �•�•�•`�ai•�•�•�•�•• ••�•�•�•ia-•�•iii•i `�•ao•=•=+i-:�iii`. .•iiii•i•iiii•i � � � , , •-i�-•c-i-••-• • � -• •! -• •• !. 1��//" •iii•iiiiii• .iiiiiiiii-if �iiiiii•�•ii••� .iiiiiiiiii• �� . � !•� i•!I�•••••!-• ♦ � • • ••••i• • !� l •iii!iiiiii• �iiiiiiiiiif �iiiiiiiii•�. •iiii�iiiiiif i I • • \• �• •• •• •i • • •i••i!.!••i!• � Uiii• •ili1�ir fry •iii� .i�ii• �i� 1_1 •ii•, 1� -r li__-__-_--•�___-_--� -�_•� !i ii ii ii i! i• i• • ••-•!--•-!!i \. U-_•-•-• � •-•-_•-� .-•_ � • 1••I• �•ii11� � � �� , i�•i�iiiiiiiiiii•liiliiiiiiliii!•i!•i••i••i-!i-�••�••��1,��,• C i'' - i-•- -•�• .-•- •i� r� �. i• i• i• i• •• i• i! i! i• i• i• • i! i• i• 1' • i •• •i •i I I' - - � D-' / • � III i 1-f ---•-! 1 -� I • •� '1- --1-• --' •iiii•••, �..•iiiii•� ►•ii0 , 'ii� •�•ii•••i•, �•iiiiiiG, &•i(! • i•, 1� I •I •• �• •E • -!-• • i !• !• ••�,� -•-•-•-•il .•i•iiiifi•, ►•iii. i� ••-•-•-•-1 .--•-•-•-•-•-1 1-•-•-• I I�� ,••••••!• - ••••••••••••/ 1 -41 IA �' �� . \ yi-� --•ice•. ` � 1 17.94 M _ co r / o CID N R=907.98 t l • 0 1 It 906 FES-4 909 1 — II r 906 30"WETLAND BUFFER / \ �1903 r \ EXISTING FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA 1.24 f �WILKINSON LAKE OHWL ELEV. 895.2 i vsx, f / / # i 1 i i _ 1 �f l 1 111 l l l l Ilttll ttltlllttl11111111tI19061111 FES-101 1tI905IIltll�11 R=9�049L`_ 9 1111111111111 Illlll 1168i 111 I /' \ �\ \�� 56 1 111 g — 1 ll It tllllll 1 ll Illtt lllttl Intl Illt ll \/ 1 .04 $ , tlltl �ltl tlllt �1 Illll llll Illll �t 111 2Q90 \ / �. \ 1 111 jllll 1,l�ltllllllltll�llllllllltllltjllllll 903 I 11111j`11�i�,, �Illllt tllllllll 111 t t Igo �` \ / 1 It llllt-�11 tllltllllltltlllltl l / ' � \ \ / / \ � \ \ N o FES-6A \ / BENCHMARK HYDRANT TNFH = 919.06 899 898� �\ T/C=908.00 �/ / / \ / /\ \ \ ✓_ - 897- / FES-6 / \ \ \ \ \ R=903.64 \ 30 MTL a$UF�R —/ EXISTING MANGE 2 WETLAND \ d tit /< /< °�hz�� / 0 / O& w ____w___NN _ ow GRADING LEGEND 101 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) 101 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) ++++ x EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION -4 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION �0 PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION �v PROPOSED TOP OF RETAINING WALL (T/W) AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL (B/W) SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. It i Tlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C4-GRADING DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE GRADING PLAN 0 40 80 SHEET SCALE IN FEET C4=14 ISG 1 C� 1 11 I a 1 1 1 1 a C� C� REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY c LL PROJECT NO. 24-30671 c FILE NAME 30671 C5-LAND DRAWN BY DWG/TW z DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 >0 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - m CEN TER VIL L E RD 77 � h 8 MCA. � �� — ■Ir,�l■I��c 1�1�'�,■Ip /�'�1'��i�l■I■1■It - ..:aiL:L�,�. r ON I -N% _ . rii>[I 11� /i � ruJ/.JJ/ �J/i.r/�//�.1J/�./Jfil • 1�� � 7 �s�� �_ ����. Ji_�•� ,,■i�iiiiiiiii�������������������iiiiiiiiiY■■■■\ , `,•^'� � �I IN FS 1���.■1 I■. � � al y••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••� a ��� � riiiiii i� ■ li' j � ■1 ice•: •:•:•- •- • ■ r b r••••• ■ •i�•i'•i�•i'•i�•i�•i�•i•• Ili �[ ■1 • •• • g g g ■ .1*000 �•••••••• ■� ■ •••• • • • • ••••••• I■ ■1 �•••FIE 934.52 •••�. . ■I�Mons • • • • 1■■ ■ •• ••••••� u / �••• • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• b •• •• •• •• •:••:••:••i u ••••••mil u■ ■ ••• •••••• I■ ��• < .��.1i1�� �t��� _ �ti �'■1•••••••••••yy•••••••••••••••••••y•••••••• • •• •••••� 1■ / •••••••iIon ■ •�•• :••�•� 10 i . - �` S ii �•� • !•� . �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �.�..• ••jam 1�, 1■1• • • • _ ......u.... w..... u....•u....m.... �.u.. r• • • • • ■ • • • II �,, ■I • • 1■ •••••• 1in ■I' ■ •••• .• •••••� III �r ` . � ��I�.,... I ��� ,` 1 ��� I•• •••�in I •••••••� M I ■ •••• •••••• DTI ' �� T� / / ' .■ •• • •� •••••••11■F •••• �• •••••� IA ■I 1••• •••1 IC• •••••••1 1■I I ■ • •• •• •� I G �� r ■. ■I t••• •••� 1■ NONE �•�•�•�il■Ir II II / / x x X x x x x x x K�x x x x x x z x % X x �+T W W L W x X X X X % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % V C % % % X7 M X LT W - �VVV X % X % x x / \ II %xxxxxxxxx%%x %x%xXx x% xx x W iV x z x z x z �✓ X X z X X% x x x ' I xxxxxxxxx%%%% x x x x x x W �Tx,x% %x%x%x xxxl"x x xxxx%xxx xxxx x%xxx W I W x%%%%%%%x LT LT xX / I %I% % x% x% x %xxx x x% /I I x x% t% x X x % % x x x x%%% x% 1 X x xxx XxX X W x%x xxxxxxxxx%%xxx xx Xxxx W T xxl xxxxxx%%%%XXxXx x% xXx x x W v x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxx x x x x x x x x X x X % x xxxxx x W W z x X X X X X X x x V x x x X X z X x x x xxxxxxx xxxxxxx% x xXx % xxx x %x%xX xx xX W W W W W x X X X X% x x x I x x z x x%%% X % x x x x W W W xxxxxxxxx%x%xxxx % %Xxx %x xxxx >`x� LT W W W I x x x x%%%% x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X% x z W' W x x z x% X X x x MTx Xx %x%xx%xx% PROPOSED BUILDING X% Xx xxxxx X W LT W W x x X X %% x x x x x /i% W W W I :%xxx x FIFE =92958 X x x x X�Rxx W W I W I x x x x x .7 E x X x X X X z z x % X PT- xxxx%% x% % xx: x x x x x x x x x%%% X x X x /x�z x•° / `Its x xmm %%% %%% X %J✓X V % X % x % % l%t % x X x - W W % x%% % x xxxx % x X x z x x% z x z x x x x x x x x x x x i x X %% x X x � � W LT v W W W fir. xt\x x x x x x %� GG % x % % % % % X % % x �% % ;a - ` W W LTx xxxx %%xxx%%% %XXXXX XXx XXXXX W X X X % % X x X % % % % % % % X X X X % % % % % X xl % X S IZt� X x x x x x x x x % x x x x x x x% x W -LT W W )V✓/W W W W W x x z x x x X � ` X X X% X X X X X% % x `�+»4 x% %%% z XT x x x x x VV X% % x x x x x x x x x x z % x x x x x W W W W W W W W W W W W X X x X X % x X x x X x X x x x x x x% x x x x x x x x x x x X X X x x 4 i W W ILT .✓ / W W W W W W W\ W W W \ x/ f W W W x X x x x x x x x x z x z x r( x W �y .. M W W W W W\ x% X x X%% X % X X% % x X% X % X x x %j X W W W I W W % % % x x x I X i W r;yT W W W W W W W W W W W \ x x x x z%% x%%% x x x x x x x x x W W W xW \� W x x x x x x z x z x x x x Y/ i W W ! W W W W W W W W W Y x x x X X X X X x x x x W W W W W % x% x x % X x X W �/ \ L x x x x x %\ % / �' W W W W W W W W W \ 1.t �1tt % / W W W / % X x X x x x x W W W W x\7� x x x x z X x X / W W t1L X x x xLtl X � j x x x X x Ix W / ` % x % X x z x X x x� X X X X X W W W W W W x x\x O /y+,) % / % /(� T X (" W W W W W W W % x% J ` • ()It 1 /{t , ` W W W % X X X X x'X Lrt x x W W W W W \\ x '4 x I��I, lI 1 .it W W // x x x x X x% x x W W W W W W %\x x x x I III �1�hJt�I" z x x z x x z x W W W W W %k%% I�Ir%d�d`��-(�IDI� II l �n W W W / X% %x%%%x W W W W W VA'✓ [j( W W W % %% X x X% X%%% W I W W W W x X X%%% z z x W W W W W W \ W %I I)I,I {�1r % x x x x x x z x z X%%% x x x W W W W W W W W x x\z I hI� ' 1OI:jtI� I�� •, W W W �� x x x x z x%%% x x`A x x it z x x x x W W W W W %t,t )IIllhlfffrrr"�o`1z .IN!!••• / %%%xxxxxxxxx x % x x x xjt/xxx xz%z xx/x I W xV I ( I� Illg I `I x x o W W W W W W W • l 1 "III ,X �.°' x W LT W W z x x x x x x x x x x x z z I x % 4�..,i4 iJJJ W W W 11 W W W W W x I I '( �j W I X X% x x x x x x x x x%%% eee W W W vW W W W W W x I�I r) T x x x x z x x x z z W W W W W W W W W W x x x x z% x x x x x x x x x x x % x %�z% % % W W W W W W W W W W W x X x x x x x%�% %% / W W W W W W W W W "It•� x% X x W W x X%%%%%%%% x x % x I W W X �/xt X% / / % % % % % % % x % x x x x t � k % % % % % % % t X x 1/ �••� %%% x x % // � C_ X X x% x //` I l`�.'./J x xf X ?i r \00,W W W � � � W �• � W W W W W W Ll W W W \00, W W W W W W W 400W W W rWr IW W W W W W W W W/ � W •Y W W � W W L I V W W W W W W W LL % x W W x X X 40000 % W W W W W x% W W W W z % W WLTW "' xX%%xxx\ X%Xx x X X x %tlq x x X X % X W LT W W W % X X X x x T W W W W x x x x x x x % x x x x x \ \ \ x W W W W x %%%%%% x x x x % % % x % % % % % % % % % x X x % x % % x % % % % % X x z x X X%% xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%x%xXxXxXxXxxAxxXxX x XX xx x_x �9 a FUTURE CANOPY COVER REQUIREMENTS: EQUATION: VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE (SF) X CANOPY COVER PERCENT = REQUIRED MINIMUM CANOPY COVER SQUARE FEET. • 95,230 x 0.4 = 38,093 • LARGE TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 25 X 950 SF = 23,750 • MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED IN INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 7 X 500 SF =3,500 • LARGE TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 16 X 600 SF = 9,600 • MEDIUM TREES PROPOSED WITHIN LESS THAN (7) FEET OF VEHICULAR HARDSCAPE: 16 X 250 SF = 4,000 / TOTAL PROPOSED: 40,850 FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: FOR EVERY 100 LF OF BUILDING 2 LARGE TREES OR 6 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. • 3,323 LF / 100 X 2 = 65 LARGE TREES / 30 LARGE TREES AND 90 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED • 8,000 LF / 100 X 6 = 480 200 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 200 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED PEN AREA REQUIREMENTS: FOR EVERY 2500 SF PF OPEN AREA 1 LARGE TREES OR 2 LARGE SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED. SMALLER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: 1 LARGE TREE = 1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS OR 3 SMALL SHRUBS OR 2 SMALL TREES. • 94,969 / 2500 = 38 LARGE TREES REQUIRED / 38 LARGE TREES PROPOSED • 94,969 / 2500 X 2 = 76 LARGE SHRUBS REQUIRED / 76 LARGE SHRUBS PROPOSED SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL USES AND ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREETS PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LT LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT) 2.5" CAL B & B MT MT MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT) 2" CAL B & B ST ST SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER) 1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SPACING SHRUB AREAS LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT) 5 GAL CONT 72" o.c. SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER) 2 GAL CONT 60" o.c. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SEEDING BASIN SEED MIX x x x x xxx x x FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX W W W W W W W W W W W W MNDOT --- 25-151 HIGH MAINTENANCE TURF NATIVE PRAIRIE SEED MIX EDGER LANDSCAPE EDGING H FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT TREES LT LT 46 LARGE TREE (40' HEIGHT) 2.5" CAL B & B MT MT 25 MEDIUM TREE (18' - 30' HEIGHT) 2" CAL B & B ST ST 9 SMALL TREE (18' HEIGHT AND UNDER) 1.5" CAL B & B SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SHRUB AREAS 241 LARGE SHRUB (6' HEIGHT) 5 GAL CONT 386 SMALL SHRUB (SHURBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER) 2 GAL CONT SYMBOL QTY DESCRIPTION SEEDING 4,737 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BASIN SEED MIX 82,97 SF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SEED MIX —N-- 2,950 LF LANDSCAPE EDGING NOTE: FOR QUANTITIES REFER TO THE SCHEDULE ON C5-10. FOR SPECIES LIST REFER TO SHEET C5-15 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. OPEN AREA SF NOT COUNTED TOWARDS REQUIRED TREES 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET I ql 1 kiTlyi architecture + design group I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JERREMY D. FOSS, PE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW ONLY DATE 3/10/2025 LIC. NO. E-39500 SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 1 & S GROUP, INC. PROJECT ANOKA HOLDINGS, LLC WILKINSON WATERS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT NO. 24-30671 FILE NAME 30671 C5-LAND DRAWN BY DWG/TW DESIGNED BY DWG/TW REVIEWED BY JDF/TW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 03/10/25 CLIENT PROJECT NO TITLE PLANTING AND RESTORATION PLAN SHEET C5=1 2 ISG 1 C� 1 11 I a 1 1 1 1 a ISG 1 C� 1 11 I a 1 1 1 1 a 2 0 U c� z w m U) to a 00 00 N 0 L0 z J Z) a a z a U) 0 N w Z) U) w w U) 0) w 00 wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 2, 2025 Re: Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Review 026515-000 WSB's review of the Preliminary Plat for the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by ISG and received March 20, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plan and Plat prepared by ISG, dated March 10, 2025. • Wilkinson Waters Stormwater Report prepared by ISG, dated March 20, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Wilkinson Waters Development includes 76 acres south of Ash Street/County Road 32, West of Centerville Road/County Road 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, the border with the City of North Oaks. The project proposes 56 Townhome units, two (2) 100- unit apartments, one (1) 100-unit senior living facility and 33,000 square feet of commercial retail space. • Grading The Wilkinson Waters Development includes site grading for the townhomes, apartments, and retail space as well as the connecting roads, driveways, and parking areas. The proposed site grades will raise the site 5 to 10 feet. The proposed site grade and the addition of building heights will be very high comparatively. It appears that the site elevations are based on the underground parking and groundwater elevations. Comments: 1. Site should be designed to better match existing grades. Lowering the site approximately 5 feet from than what is proposed. The applicant should consider an underground subsurface drainage system. 2. Provide EOF elevations, locations and routes for all low points in the paved and greenspaces. Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 2 3. Retaining walls exceeding 4' in height shall require a plan prepared by a Minnesota licensed structural engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance a. Provide top and bottom of wall elevations at beginning and end of wall, at point of maximum height, and at points along the length of wall to adequately describe the retaining wall and to display final grading accurately. b. Retaining walls are not allowed in easements or public rights -of -way c. Provide fences for safety as required 4. Show all high and break points 5. Label all inlet elevations 6. Provide slopes across parking areas and along curbs 7. Minimize drainage areas to all underground parking entrances a. Provide overflow options • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Needed if basins Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 landlocked Currently Needed if basins 17.76 45.54 117.14 Proposed landlocked Comments: 1. Compliance with stormwater requirements will be reviewed by the City. However, any wetland impacts must be permitted through the LGU for the site, VLAWMO. 2. Per NURP design criteria, sedimentation basins must provide dead storage of at least the 2.5" storm event volume of runoff from the tributary area. The 2.5" storm event must be provided in future modeling to ensure compliance with this standard. a. If this standard is met, additional pretreatment such as the SAFL Baffles and rain gardens are not needed. These pretreatment BMPs are recommended to be removed if Basin 1 is sufficiently sized so as to reduce future maintenance needs. MIDS modeling is also not needed if Basin 1 is demonstrated as meeting NURP design criteria. 3. A surfacewater reuse system is required. Rice Creek Watershed District staff may be able to supply a water reuse spreadsheet for use in calculating water reuse rates and areas for the site. 4. The steepest allowable slope below the 10' aquatic bench is 3: 1. Current grading of 2:1 is too steep and must be revised. 5. The outlet pipe for Basin 1 must be submerged at least 1' below the NWL. a. Considering this basin is intended for irrigation reuse, the outlet pipe should be set such that it is submerged even at the lowest planned water elevation. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 3 6. An impervious clay liner may be required below Basin 1 as geotech borings in and around the pond show some sandy/silty soils that may infiltrate water meant for irrigation reuse. This will be evaluated with the next submittal. 7. Tree plantings are not recommended on the Basin 1 berm as root growth may weaken its integrity over time. 8. All BMPs and site depressions need to show EOF locations and elevations. 9. Curb cuts must have rock stabilization over the flow path to BMPs. 10. Wilkinson Way will be a public road so inlet spread and run calcs, in particular at sag points, must be provided and ensure an 8' drivable lane during the 3-year storm event. 11. All proposed pipe serving Wilkinson Way must have supporting calculations to ensure there is capacity for conveying the 10-year storm event. 12. The maximum pipe velocity is 10 ft/sec and the minimum is 3 ft/sec. 13. The City minimum storm sewer size for public roads is 15" and must be RCP. Include storm sewer pipe material on utilities sheets. a. Pipe from ST-108A to ST-108 must be increased to 15" diameter. 14. Structure types and sizes should be called out for Wilkinson Way storm sewer. 15. Show storm sewer in profile view along Wilkinson Way to ensure there are no utility conflicts. a. Utility crossings should be checked across the site to ensure there are no conflicts and to call out insulation as needed. 16. Ensure structure diameters are sized properly for alignments with pipes at acute angles or with large diameter pipes. 17. What is the purpose for structure ST-2? 18. How will the low points at driveways into Buildings A and B be drained? 19. Indicate tip -out gutter as needed to ensure pooling is avoided in upgradient portions of parking lots. 20. ST-3(72) should be moved to the corner of the nearest parking stall rather than on the curb radius. 21. It is recommended to route ST-201 directly to FES-4A to avoid daylighting drainage and potentially flooding onto the proposed trail. 22. The OCS details on sheet CO-26 do not match HydroCAD modeling. 23. HydroCAD modeling has a 36" pipe from OCS-2 to FES-6, however this is shown as a 30" pipe in the plans. 24. HydroCAD modeling of OCS-2 has a 5' wide weir, but a 6' wide grate. Please reconcile these differences. 25. Use native prairie seed mix on Basin 1 slopes. 26. Deconflict storm sewer and proposed trees to the extent practical, overlap of planting can result in root intrusion long-term, especially where trees are proposed near structures. • Water Supply The City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area being served by Lino Lakes via a 12" trunk water line. Lino Lakes City water is about 1.5 miles away and the City is not considering an extension at this time. In the interim the site is planned to be supplied by the existing White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes and into the north end of North Oaks. This will require a Joint Powers Agreement between all of the Cities involved. The development proposes two connections. A 12" connection at the south end on the west side of the proposed roundabout which will be extended along Wilkinson Way north to the Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 4 north end for a future connection to Ash Street (CR 32) to meet the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The second connection will utilize the existing 8" stub as part of the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes . Otherwise, the development will include a water system with 8- inch diameter water main and various stub sizes being extended to each lot depending on its use. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Comments: 1. Remove the proposed 12" gate valve on the north leg of the tee. The gate valve will be installed with the future extension of the line to the north. 2. The existing watermain stub at the roundabout is 12" not 8" 3. Locate proposed gate valves consistently on all water service stubs 4. Label all water service stub size, length, and material 5. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) 6. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 7. Shift gate valve from northern leg to southern leg of 12" x 8" cross 8. Maintain minimum required 10' horizontal separation between watermain and storm sewer alignments 9. Note separation between sanitary sewer and water services across Wilkinson Way a. Some services will need to be shifted to maintain separation. • Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Wilkinson Waters Development is proposed to connect to the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes. There is also an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 that is believed to be owned and maintained by White Bear Township as well and is planned to serve Lino Lakes sewer district 4. This will require a Joint Powers Agreements between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Per the Centerville Road Sanitary Sewer memo updated 4/22/21, the City of Lino Lakes service district 4 has 354 GPM capacity reserved in the Centerville Road trunk line. There is an additional lift station planned in the future to serve the remainder of district 4 that will pump into the 18" line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. This forcemain can be drilled within City or County right of way in the future. The 8 inch line that is being required to extend to Ash Street would only serve a small localized area of sewer district 4. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with various sized service pipes being extended to each lot depending on its use. An additional sanitary sewer stub will be extended to the north at Ash Street (CR 32) for future connections. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Additionally calculations will need to be made for the increased flows to the existing lift station in North Oaks and whether upgrading of the pumps will need to occur. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 5 Comments: 1. Extend the existing 18" sanitary sewer stub outside the roadway into right of way as shown in the attached redlines 2. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) a. The sanitary sewer between Lots 3 and 4 Block 1 would require a 40' total easement 3. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 4. Maintain sanitary sewer manholes on road centerlines 5. Applicant to verify the existing Lift Station has capacity for the proposed project. • Transportation Ensure City parking space requirements are met and ADA spaces are all marked on the site plan. Townhouses project with 8+ units require guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units. Include lighting unit type and mounting on the Photometric Plan. Trails and sidewalks Show the sidewalk/trail connection at the Ash Street and Wilkinson Way intersection. Comments: 1. See comments provided on the Wilkinson Waters TIS, major comments include: a. Review trip generation b. Verify most recent site plan is incorporated into the study c. Forecast traffic on Wilkinson Way d. Review trip distribution and turning movement exhibits, volumes are missing e. Revise LOS and turn lane analysis based on revised turning movement calculations 2. The intersection at Wilkinson Way and Ash St/CR 32 will need to be right in right out a. Turn lane plans shall be submitted with final plat. They will require Anoka County approval. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan The Vadnais Lake Area WMO (VLAWMO) (WCA LGU) issued a Notice of Decision (NOD) (LGU No. 14.2021) approving the wetland boundaries on March 17, 2022 (Appendix A). The decision is valid for 5 years. The WCA NOD also confirmed that Wetland 7 is an incidental wetland and therefore not regulated -under WCA. The USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) on April 6, 2022 for Wetlands 8, 9 and 10 (File No. MVP-2015-03940-SSC) (Appendix A). The AJD is valid for 5 years. A map of the site location is provided in Figure 1. Three wetlands (Wetlands 1, 7, and 10) were delineated within the current project area in September 2021 by KES (Figure 2). Previously submitted information discussed the delineation in more detail and included the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and soil survey mapping. A copy of the previously Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 6 submitted delineation report (Hawkins-Rogalla Lino Lakes Wetland Delineation Report) is available upon request. A wetland replacement plan and no loss request (for incidental wetland) was submitted, reviewed, and approved through VLAWMO and the City. The TEP in its WCA Notice of Decision agreed that WI-7 is incidental per WCA rules, WL10 is wetland based on new guidance and the WI-5 boundary was extended to the northwest. Per aerial photos in 3-9- 2022 addendum, WI-9 and WI-8 are wetland. No other changes were directed to all other delineated wetland boundaries in the project area. Approved wetland boundaries are shown in the 3-10-2022 Rogalla and Hawkins surveys from Kurth Surveying, Inc. The proposed WCA-regulated 0.13 ac of impact to Wetland 10 will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio via the debiting of wetland bank credits from the Rapp Farm and Anderson Slough wetland bank (#170) located within major watershed 20 and Bank Service Area 7, which is the same major watershed and Bank Service Area as the project location. This bank is owned by the project applicant. A draft Standard Credit Withdrawal Form is included. Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for USACE-regulated Wetland 7. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Wilkinson Waters Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City's Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The proposed pond berm and trail grading appears to result in floodplain fill. Calculation of compensatory cut must be provided to ensure there is no net fill in the floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features The plan shows White Bear Lake Township easements (30' and 50') with the existing sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the site. White Bear Lake Township has commented that the Township has no easement and that the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. Please update the linework or provide a record showing the easements. Comments: 1. For pipe within drainage and utility easements that is greater than 10' deep, easements must be set with a width equal to the pipe depth. For example, a 20' deep pipe would require 20' wide easements on either side of the alignment. a. This appears to be needed for P-101, P-102, P-111, P-110, and P-202. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 7 2. Drainage and utility easements are needed for all proposed rain gardens up to the extents of the 100-year HWL. 3. Provide existing easement figure showing all ownership 4. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be dedicated over wetlands, ditches, and the greenway • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Private stormwater facilities will be maintained through a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities. The City of Lino Lakes shall be party to the Declaration. City Engineer to provide template. • Permits Required Required permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Permit 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Attachment 13. City Engineer Memo wsb Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: April 2, 2025 Re: Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plat Review 026515-000 WSB's review of the Preliminary Plat for the Wilkinson Waters development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by ISG and received March 20, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: 0 U Wilkinson Waters Preliminary Plan and Plat prepared by ISG, dated March 10, 2025. w Wilkinson Waters Stormwater Report prepared by ISG, dated March 20, 2025. m co — The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. 0 a co Engineering co N 0General The Wilkinson Waters Development includes 76 acres south of Ash Street/County Road 32, West of Centerville Road/County Road 21 and north of Wilkinson Lake Boulevard, the U) border with the City of North Oaks. The project proposes 56 Townhome units, two (2) 100- unit apartments, one (1) 100-unit senior living facility and 33,000 square feet of commercial retail space. J Q Grading a_ Z The Wilkinson Waters Development includes site grading for the townhomes, apartments, a U) and retail space as well as the connecting roads, driveways, and parking areas. The proposed site grades will raise the site 5 to 10 feet. The proposed site grade and the N addition of building heights will be very high comparatively. It appears that the site w elevations are based on the underground parking and groundwater elevations. _ Comments: 1. Site should be designed to better match existing grades. Lowering the site w approximately 5 feet from than what is proposed. The applicant should consider an underground subsurface drainage system. = 2. Provide EOF elevations, locations and routes for all low points in the paved and 0) greenspaces. w co Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 2 3. Retaining walls exceeding 4' in height shall require a plan prepared by a Minnesota licensed structural engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance a. Provide top and bottom of wall elevations at beginning and end of wall, at point of maximum height, and at points along the length of wall to adequately describe the retaining wall and to display final grading accurately. b. Retaining walls are not allowed in easements or public rights -of -way c. Provide fences for safety as required 4. Show all high and break points 5. Label all inlet elevations 6. Provide slopes across parking areas and along curbs 7. Minimize drainage areas to all underground parking entrances a. Provide overflow options • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Wilkinson Waters site consists of a large sedimentation basin and various smaller BMPs to provide additional treatment. There is also a proposed future public street that must meet City design standards. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Needed if basins Existing 25.47 55.87 127.68 landlocked Currently Needed if basins 17.76 45.54 117.14 Proposed landlocked Comments: 1. Compliance with stormwater requirements will be reviewed by the City. However, any wetland impacts must be permitted through the LGU for the site, VLAWMO. 2. Per NURP design criteria, sedimentation basins must provide dead storage of at least the 2.5" storm event volume of runoff from the tributary area. The 2.5" storm event must be provided in future modeling to ensure compliance with this standard. a. If this standard is met, additional pretreatment such as the SAFL Baffles and rain gardens are not needed. These pretreatment BMPs are recommended to be removed if Basin 1 is sufficiently sized so as to reduce future maintenance needs. MIDS modeling is also not needed if Basin 1 is demonstrated as meeting NURP design criteria. 3. A surfacewater reuse system is required. Rice Creek Watershed District staff may be able to supply a water reuse spreadsheet for use in calculating water reuse rates and areas for the site. 4. The steepest allowable slope below the 10' aquatic bench is 3: 1. Current grading of 2:1 is too steep and must be revised. 5. The outlet pipe for Basin 1 must be submerged at least 1' below the NWL. a. Considering this basin is intended for irrigation reuse, the outlet pipe should be set such that it is submerged even at the lowest planned water elevation. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 3 6. An impervious clay liner may be required below Basin 1 as geotech borings in and around the pond show some sandy/silty soils that may infiltrate water meant for irrigation reuse. This will be evaluated with the next submittal. 7. Tree plantings are not recommended on the Basin 1 berm as root growth may weaken its integrity over time. 8. All BMPs and site depressions need to show EOF locations and elevations. 9. Curb cuts must have rock stabilization over the flow path to BMPs. 10. Wilkinson Way will be a public road so inlet spread and run calcs, in particular at sag points, must be provided and ensure an 8' drivable lane during the 3-year storm event. 11. All proposed pipe serving Wilkinson Way must have supporting calculations to ensure there is capacity for conveying the 10-year storm event. 12. The maximum pipe velocity is 10 ft/sec and the minimum is 3 ft/sec. 13. The City minimum storm sewer size for public roads is 15" and must be RCP. Include storm sewer pipe material on utilities sheets. a. Pipe from ST-108A to ST-108 must be increased to 15" diameter. 14. Structure types and sizes should be called out for Wilkinson Way storm sewer. 15. Show storm sewer in profile view along Wilkinson Way to ensure there are no utility conflicts. a. Utility crossings should be checked across the site to ensure there are no conflicts and to call out insulation as needed. 16. Ensure structure diameters are sized properly for alignments with pipes at acute angles or with large diameter pipes. 17. What is the purpose for structure ST-2? 18. How will the low points at driveways into Buildings A and B be drained? 19. Indicate tip -out gutter as needed to ensure pooling is avoided in upgradient portions of parking lots. 20. ST-3(72) should be moved to the corner of the nearest parking stall rather than on the curb radius. 21. It is recommended to route ST-201 directly to FES-4A to avoid daylighting drainage and potentially flooding onto the proposed trail. 22. The OCS details on sheet CO-26 do not match HydroCAD modeling. 23. HydroCAD modeling has a 36" pipe from OCS-2 to FES-6, however this is shown as a 30" pipe in the plans. 24. HydroCAD modeling of OCS-2 has a 5' wide weir, but a 6' wide grate. Please reconcile these differences. 25. Use native prairie seed mix on Basin 1 slopes. 26. Deconflict storm sewer and proposed trees to the extent practical, overlap of planting can result in root intrusion long-term, especially where trees are proposed near structures. • Water Supply The City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area being served by Lino Lakes via a 12" trunk water line. Lino Lakes City water is about 1.5 miles away and the City is not considering an extension at this time. In the interim the site is planned to be supplied by the existing White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes and into the north end of North Oaks. This will require a Joint Powers Agreement between all of the Cities involved. The development proposes two connections. A 12" connection at the south end on the west side of the proposed roundabout which will be extended along Wilkinson Way north to the Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 4 north end for a future connection to Ash Street (CR 32) to meet the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The second connection will utilize the existing 8" stub as part of the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes . Otherwise, the development will include a water system with 8- inch diameter water main and various stub sizes being extended to each lot depending on its use. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Comments: 1. Remove the proposed 12" gate valve on the north leg of the tee. The gate valve will be installed with the future extension of the line to the north. 2. The existing watermain stub at the roundabout is 12" not 8" 3. Locate proposed gate valves consistently on all water service stubs 4. Label all water service stub size, length, and material 5. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) 6. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 7. Shift gate valve from northern leg to southern leg of 12" x 8" cross 8. Maintain minimum required 10' horizontal separation between watermain and storm sewer alignments 9. Note separation between sanitary sewer and water services across Wilkinson Way a. Some services will need to be shifted to maintain separation. • Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer collection for the Wilkinson Waters Development is proposed to connect to the existing assumed White Bear Lake Township infrastructure that is located across the Rapp farmland in Lino Lakes. There is also an existing 18 inch sanitary sewer line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21 that is believed to be owned and maintained by White Bear Township as well and is planned to serve Lino Lakes sewer district 4. This will require a Joint Powers Agreements between the developer North Oaks Farms, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Per the Centerville Road Sanitary Sewer memo updated 4/22/21, the City of Lino Lakes service district 4 has 354 GPM capacity reserved in the Centerville Road trunk line. There is an additional lift station planned in the future to serve the remainder of district 4 that will pump into the 18" line located at the intersection of Wilkinson Lake Blvd/CR J (81)/CSAH 21. This forcemain can be drilled within City or County right of way in the future. The 8 inch line that is being required to extend to Ash Street would only serve a small localized area of sewer district 4. The site will otherwise be served by 8- inch diameter main along with various sized service pipes being extended to each lot depending on its use. An additional sanitary sewer stub will be extended to the north at Ash Street (CR 32) for future connections. Current and future ownership and maintenance of all existing utility infrastructure will need to be clarified between the developer, White Bear Lake Township, and the Cities of North Oaks and Lino Lakes. Additionally calculations will need to be made for the increased flows to the existing lift station in North Oaks and whether upgrading of the pumps will need to occur. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 5 Comments: 1. Extend the existing 18" sanitary sewer stub outside the roadway into right of way as shown in the attached redlines 2. Provide minimum 1:1 easement for watermain outside the right of way (minimum 20' centered on the utility) a. The sanitary sewer between Lots 3 and 4 Block 1 would require a 40' total easement 3. Extend utilities a minimum 10' past the storm sewer at the Ash Street intersection 4. Maintain sanitary sewer manholes on road centerlines 5. Applicant to verify the existing Lift Station has capacity for the proposed project. • Transportation Ensure City parking space requirements are met and ADA spaces are all marked on the site plan. Townhouses project with 8+ units require guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units. Include lighting unit type and mounting on the Photometric Plan. Trails and sidewalks Show the sidewalk/trail connection at the Ash Street and Wilkinson Way intersection. Comments: 1. See comments provided on the Wilkinson Waters TIS, major comments include: a. Review trip generation b. Verify most recent site plan is incorporated into the study c. Forecast traffic on Wilkinson Way d. Review trip distribution and turning movement exhibits, volumes are missing e. Revise LOS and turn lane analysis based on revised turning movement calculations 2. The intersection at Wilkinson Way and Ash St/CR 32 will need to be right in right out a. Turn lane plans shall be submitted with final plat. They will require Anoka County approval. Wetlands and Mitigation Plan The Vadnais Lake Area WMO (VLAWMO) (WCA LGU) issued a Notice of Decision (NOD) (LGU No. 14.2021) approving the wetland boundaries on March 17, 2022 (Appendix A). The decision is valid for 5 years. The WCA NOD also confirmed that Wetland 7 is an incidental wetland and therefore not regulated -under WCA. The USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) on April 6, 2022 for Wetlands 8, 9 and 10 (File No. MVP-2015-03940-SSC) (Appendix A). The AJD is valid for 5 years. A map of the site location is provided in Figure 1. Three wetlands (Wetlands 1, 7, and 10) were delineated within the current project area in September 2021 by KES (Figure 2). Previously submitted information discussed the delineation in more detail and included the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and soil survey mapping. A copy of the previously Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 6 submitted delineation report (Hawkins-Rogalla Lino Lakes Wetland Delineation Report) is available upon request. A wetland replacement plan and no loss request (for incidental wetland) was submitted, reviewed, and approved through VLAWMO and the City. The TEP in its WCA Notice of Decision agreed that WI-7 is incidental per WCA rules, WL10 is wetland based on new guidance and the WI-5 boundary was extended to the northwest. Per aerial photos in 3-9- 2022 addendum, WI-9 and WI-8 are wetland. No other changes were directed to all other delineated wetland boundaries in the project area. Approved wetland boundaries are shown in the 3-10-2022 Rogalla and Hawkins surveys from Kurth Surveying, Inc. The proposed WCA-regulated 0.13 ac of impact to Wetland 10 will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio via the debiting of wetland bank credits from the Rapp Farm and Anderson Slough wetland bank (#170) located within major watershed 20 and Bank Service Area 7, which is the same major watershed and Bank Service Area as the project location. This bank is owned by the project applicant. A draft Standard Credit Withdrawal Form is included. Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for USACE-regulated Wetland 7. Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for Wilkinson Waters Addition has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City's Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The proposed pond berm and trail grading appears to result in floodplain fill. Calculation of compensatory cut must be provided to ensure there is no net fill in the floodplain. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features The plan shows White Bear Lake Township easements (30' and 50') with the existing sanitary sewer and watermain crossing the site. White Bear Lake Township has commented that the Township has no easement and that the lines were installed and owned by the North Oaks Company. Please update the linework or provide a record showing the easements. Comments: 1. For pipe within drainage and utility easements that is greater than 10' deep, easements must be set with a width equal to the pipe depth. For example, a 20' deep pipe would require 20' wide easements on either side of the alignment. a. This appears to be needed for P-101, P-102, P-111, P-110, and P-202. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Ms. Katie Larsen 04/02/2025 Page 7 2. Drainage and utility easements are needed for all proposed rain gardens up to the extents of the 100-year HWL. 3. Provide existing easement figure showing all ownership 4. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be dedicated over wetlands, ditches, and the greenway • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement Private stormwater facilities will be maintained through a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities. The City of Lino Lakes shall be party to the Declaration. City Engineer to provide template. • Permits Required Required permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Permit 6. US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. Wilkinson Waters Development - Engineering Review Attachment 14. Anoka County Highway Department Email From: Loaan Keehr To: Katie Larsen Subject: RE: Wilkinson Waters Submittals Date: Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:19:59 AM Attachments: image001.jpg Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hi Katie, The proposed ROW line shown should be sufficient. The access on Ash St. will need a right turn lane and will be a right in/right out access. Let me know if you have any questions. Logan Keehr, PE Traffic Engineer II Anoka County Transportation Division High way- Transit-FI eet-Surveyor-GIS 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 www.anokacountn.gov Office: 763-324-3100 Direct: 763-324-3183 Fax: 763-324-3020 ourp2ssiov,. is i our safe wPU howv.el From: Marissa Ertel <MErtel@linolakes.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 2:08 PM To: Logan Keehr<Logan.Keehr@anokacountymn.gov>; Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; pchaffey@isdl2.org; mgrossklaus@isdl2.org; smassey@flaschools.org; crehnberg@flaschools.org; timothy.wald@isd624.org; Kevin Kress <KKress@northoaksmn.gov>; pwplanreview@ramseycounty.us; brian.corcoran@vlamo.org Cc: Katie Larsen <KLarsen@linolakes.us> Subject: Wilkinson Waters Submittals You don't often get email from mertel(aJinolakes.us. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This message originated from outside the Anoka County email C I T Environmental Memo I N K E To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments— Wilkinson Waters PPP PP Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1. Complete the noise mitigation study and submit findings if any additional berming or screening is required. 2. Building setbacks to Wilkinson Lake as proposed should be maintained. 3. Work with planning and zoning on building heights. Currently building heights exceed the requirements for the shoreland district. a. Board recommends additional overstory planted adjacent to buildings that exceed the requirements for additional screening and sight lines. 4. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. i. Water balance study is being conducted b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA i. Infiltration basins are shown for pretreatment of parking lot runoff. c. Currently private drainage from parking lots is by passing pre-treatment basins within the parking lot and discharging into the stormwater basins. Any private drainage must first be treated prior to discharge into a public stormwater basin. i. If private drainage cannot be treated prior to discharge the basins shall be privately maintained. 5. Storm sewer between town homes should discharge between the buildings into a swale before continuing west to the drainage swale and entering the storm basin. a. Creating water features between the buildings with native plantings and vegetation will provide a higher level of stormwater treatment and create "fingers of green" running through the site to enhance wildlife habitat. 6. The project should include expanded buffers adjacent to Wetland 1. A restoration and management plan should be developed for upland buffer areas consistent with pre -settlement vegetation. 7. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27. 8. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations. 9. Provide ESA classification and basic use designation for the 57 trees being removed. It appears that several of the trees will be larger than 12" in diameter and would require a 2:1 replacement planting. Table 6 Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards Environmentally Sensitive Tree Location: within Basic Use Tree Location: not within Basic Use Area Area (ESA) Category Area deciduous trees 6 inches DBH and deciduous trees 6-12 inches DBH deciduous trees over 12 inches over or evergreen trees between or evergreen trees between 12 and DBH or evergreen trees over 20 12 to 20 feet tall 20 feet tall feet tall Non -ESA no mitigation required provide one tree per tree removed provide two trees per tree removed Natural Resource provide one tree per four trees provide two trees per tree removed provide three trees per tree Enhancement Area removed removed Natural Resource provide one tree per two trees provide two trees per tree removed provide three trees per tree Conservation Area removed removed a. b. Plans show removal of 38 trees of which 30 are significant. Clarify total number of removals. c. On the removal plans add the tree identification number so we can correlate it with the tree inventory. Page 2 d. Coniferous trees are shown as measured by DBH, city standards measure coniferous trees by height. Please provide height measurements for all coniferous trees planned to be removed. 10. Plant additional "large" canopy trees on the backside of the proposed senior living building within the shoreland district. a. Increased heights of proposed building should include additional screening on the backside of the building to break up the outline from the lake. 11. Sheet C5.13 should include the species of trees proposed to be planted instead of large, medium, and small. a. Provide numbers for each species of tree to be planted. 12. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site -specific mixes for each location. a. Low maintenance and drought resistant species should be proposed throughout the development to reduce the need for irrigation. 13. 4" minimum of topsoil is required for final planting of all ground covers, seed, and sod. Soil shall be loosened and prepped to a minimum depth of 4" to reduce compaction and allow for root growth. 14. The proposed trail should make a loop in the open space area and run along ash street before connecting back into Wilkinson way. a. Currently the trail is proposed to dead end in the park/open space. Opportunities for additional trail exist throughout the park. Potentially linking the trail system through any future proposed bmp as part of the VLAWMO BMP study. 15. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals 16. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb should be proposed within the roadway to allow turtles access off the road for travel. Page 3 Attadlunent 15. Environmental BoardMemo C I T Y' ^; O F Environmental Memo 1 IN KES To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: March 26, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments— Wilkinson Waters PPP PP Environmental Board had recommended the following at their March 26, 2025 meeting: 1. Complete the noise mitigation study and submit findings if any additional berming or screening is required. 2. Building setbacks to Wilkinson Lake as proposed should be maintained. 3. Work with planning and zoning on building heights. Currently building heights exceed the requirements for the shoreland district. a. Board recommends additional overstory planted adjacent to buildings that exceed the requirements for additional screening and sight lines. 4. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. i. Water balance study is being conducted b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings. If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards (MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA i. Infiltration basins are shown for pretreatment of parking lot runoff. c. Currently private drainage from parking lots is by passing pre-treatment basins within the parking lot and discharging into the Stormwater basins. Any private drainage must first be treated prior to discharge into a public Stormwater basin. i. If private drainage cannot be treated prior to discharge the basins shall be privately maintained. 5. Storm sewer between town homes should discharge between the buildings into a swale before continuing west to the drainage swale and entering the storm basin. a. Creating water features between the buildings with native plantings and vegetation will provide a higher level of stormwater treatment and create "fingers of green" running through the site to enhance wildlife habitat. 6. The project should include expanded buffers adjacent to Wetland 1. A restoration and management plan should be developed for upland buffer areas consistent with pre -settlement vegetation. 7. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in accordance with City tree protection fence detail. City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard detail Gen-27. 8. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating or nesting bat populations. 9. Provide ESA classification and basic use designation for the 57 trees being removed. It appears that several of the trees will be larger than 12" in diameter and would require a 2:1 replacement planting. Table 6 Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards Environmentally Sensitive Tree Location: within Basic Use Tree Location: not within Basic Use Area Area (ESA) Category Area deciduous trees 6 inches DBH and deciduous trees 6-12 inches DBH deciduous trees over 12 inches over or evergreen trees between or evergreen trees between 12 and DBH or evergreen trees over 20 12 to 20 feet tall 20 feet tall feet tall Non -ESA no mitigation required provide one tree per tree removed provide two trees per tree removed Natural Resource provide one tree per four trees provide two trees per tree removed provide three trees per tree Enhancement Area removed removed Natural Resource provide one tree per two trees provide two trees per tree removed provide three trees per tree Conservation Area removed removed a. b. Plans show removal of 38 trees of which 30 are significant. Clarify total number of removals. c. On the removal plans add the tree identification number so we can correlate it with the tree inventory. Page 2 d. Coniferous trees are shown as measured by DBH, city standards measure coniferous trees by height. Please provide height measurements for all coniferous trees planned to be removed. 10. Plant additional "large" canopy trees on the backside of the proposed senior living building within the shoreland district. a. Increased heights of proposed building should include additional screening on the backside of the building to break up the outline from the lake. 11. Sheet C5.13 should include the species of trees proposed to be planted instead of large, medium, and small. a. Provide numbers for each species of tree to be planted. 12. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans. Please provide more site -specific mixes for each location. a. Low maintenance and drought resistant species should be proposed throughout the development to reduce the need for irrigation. 13. 4" minimum of topsoil is required for final planting of all ground covers, seed, and sod. Soil shall be loosened and prepped to a minimum depth of 4" to reduce compaction and allow for root growth. 14. The proposed trail should make a loop in the open space area and run along ash street before connecting back into Wilkinson way. a. Currently the trail is proposed to dead end in the park/open space. Opportunities for additional trail exist throughout the park. Potentially linking the trail system through any future proposed bmp as part of the VLAWMO BMP study. 15. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals 16. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb should be proposed within the roadway to allow turtles access off the road for travel. Page 3 Attachment 16. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Neighborhood Meeting Summary A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, February 4, 2025 from 4-6PM at the Jerome Room at 5959 Centerville Road, North Oaks. MN 55127. Residents within 600' of the property were invited to attend and were notified via a direct mailing postcard to their addresses listed on Anoka County's website. Attendees signed in and provided their addresses for reference. A short presentation was prepared to share the project with residents and comment cards were circulated to attendees. Questions and comments of the residents were answered at the event. After the event the presentation was emailed to attendees as requested. Attachments: 1. Mailer 2. Mailing List 3. Sign In Sheet 4. Presentation 5. Comment Card Responses Wilkinson Waters PUD Preliminary Plan Submittal 2/10/2025 Rapp Farm HOA Scott Armstrong 0 Leaf Wing Drive 14 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks, MN 55127 Robert Braga Henson Tr Aaron Perkins 15 Leaf Wing Drive 16 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks, MN 55127 Justin Messner Timothy Kappers Tr 17 Leaf Wing Drive 18 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks, MN 55127 Sama Sandy Anne Mohns 19 Leaf Wing Drive 20 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks, MN 55127 Francis Ngwa Sabry Sharara 22 Leaf Wing Drive 24 Leaf Wing Drive North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks, MN 55127 North Oaks Homeowners Association 100 Village Center Drive Suite 240 North Oaks, MN 55127 County of Anoka 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 William R Shearen 1458 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Lowel J Crandall Sander 1509 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Lawrence M Hall 1565 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Drake Properties LLC 1150 County Road J White Bear Township, MN 55127 Kevin Burns 1440 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Warren D Bachman, Sr 1487 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Kelsey M Mallman 1557 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Carolyn M Ceronsky 1573 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Kent and Jeannine Lanz 1579 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Alan and Natalie Sagdalen 1601 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Grove Brad & Jaworski M 1605 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 City of St. Paul 1900 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 Schwing America Inc 5900 Centerville Road White Bear Township, MN 55128 Jerry A W000dstrom 1591 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Noelle Katherine Roden 1603 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Omar Molinos 1613 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Prebyterian Homes of North Oaks 2845 Hamline Avenue North Suite 200 Roseville, MN 55113 Sara Rogalla 6063 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Roger Eddy 6097 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Amy Donlin 6100 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Jennifer M Kasten 6151 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Spirit Master Funding X LLC 6632 Telegraph Road Unit 193 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301 Scott Hanson 12922 Keller Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 Victoria Eddy 6097 Ash Street Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Gallop Trustee, Debra A 6102 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Thomas Stanley Laumeyer 6174 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 Gary D Wruck 6637 Marbella Lane Naples, FL 34105 Wilkinson Waters Neighborhood Meeting Sign -In February 4, 2025 2/4/2025 WILKINSON WATERS Neighborhood Meeting February 4, 2025 Jerome Room 5959 Centerville Road North Oaks, MN 55127 1 Project Partners Lauren Grouws . lauren@northoaks.com 651-484-3361 o Mark Houge mark@northoaks.com 651-484-3361 2 2/4/2025 V 2040 Ash t Comprehensive Plan Ike Mixed Use/Signature Gateway (8-10 units/ac, up to 15 units/ac) ilkinson • High Density Residential (20-25 units/ac) - Medium Density Residential (4-6 units/ac) North s Low Density Residential A Comprehensive Plan Amendment through the Medium Density Residential Metropolitan Council is - High Density Residential required to blend the densities across the lots. Mixed Use Commercial County Road J, Centerville Road and 35E o --- PRITIIVIINARY ' ANOKKA CO�UN W . 1 -" NAMSEY COUNYY •mire eewa row�sx�r �� _/ rRI—F 2/4/2025 ..... . \ . q Commercial/'� L 4 .. Retail ..._..: .. -- .. ;;$` h _,,,'._ ' \!. L X V2S ." LAKE.".".". `` t Senior \ .• : .... ,,, - }, Living ..................... tee' __ _ -__ _ ________________ _ ..................... _ m 5 I Wilkinson Waters Proposal 200 apartment units 40 townhome units (4-plexes) 100 senior living units Commercial/Retail Road, Sidewalks and Trails Water and Sewer Utilities Stormwater Treatment and Conveyance Stormwater Reuse for Irrigation 3 2/4/2025 Project Schedule August-October2024 October 2024 - February 2025 February - April 2025 May - August 2025 May - August 2025 August- November2025 Apartment Q3 2025 - Q4 2026 N Country Road J/Centerville/35E Road Construction June 2025 - Q2 2026? Please provide comments and let's stay connected! o Please provide your comments and questions on the project on one side of the notecard. o On the other, please provide your name, address, email and phone number (able to receive text messages) so that we can keep you updated on the project. so WILKINSON WATERS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD �1 What do you like about the project? What would you like to see in the commercial/retail area of this project? Other comments. ,h Ic� u � �i �, 4A l r PYO, 6�� bC GC. C� k d c s /J �r /'. A/0 1'id �� 0, t) t, 0 L't lze.5 ,ems �6��y m "Y WILKINSON WATERS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD S What do you like about the J ro'ect?` P What would you like to see in the commercial/retail Ad� area of this project? Other comments. 4 Ire) Note{-tc ..-Pr-0 " WILKINSON WATERS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD 7� 1L. -f h 1A What do you like yv%p P 464L `J • about the project? , What would you like O y �.. � to see in the commercial retail .r Lo w �✓�f� area of this project? / 0aJACC grAOSS �. Other comments �CS If l7 77iW. StreA' Loll KNP VYa verb �/70A WILKINSON WATERS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COMMENT CARD I What do you lik about the proje What would you like to see in the 1-11 commercial retail area of this proje Dther comments. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant BACKGROUND In 2022 the City Council authorized a partnership with the Rice Creek Watershed District to identify potential water quality improvements to reduce volume and sediment/nutrient loading to Rice Lake. Rice Lake is designated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as an impaired water. The study evaluated potential improvements to Shenandoah Park. A private ditch system maintained by the city runs through the park, under Birch Street, and discharges into Rice Lake. The ditch serves as the primary stormwater outlet for the residential neighborhood extending south to Coyote Trail. Most of the park area is comprised of partially drained wetland. Staff are of the opinion that the opportunity exists for a restoration project that would enhance water quality and provide an improved greenway element to the park. The City partnered with Rice Creek Watershed District to fund the final report, which was completed in December of 2022. The report included four alternatives of which two, options 3 and 4, were recommended by the Environmental Board for future consideration at the January 25th, 2023 meeting. Each of the concepts provided water quality and volume improvements, ecological restoration, and floodplain mitigation. Options for future trail connections were also evaluated. Due to the estimated cost of the projects, it was recommended that the City pursue grant funding through RCWD or other agencies. The City's 5-year Capital Improvement Plan identified this project for implementation in 2025. The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) has established the Watershed Based Implementation Funding (WBIF) Grant Program. The grant program allocates funding to each watershed area for allocation in a collaborative local process. City staff and RCWD have proposed the Shenandoah project for funding through this program. The City of Lino Lakes was selected as one of the projects moving forward as part of the grant program. The grant in the amount of $52,650 is to complete plans and specs for the above referenced stormwater improvement project. Grants must be completed and signed no later than June 1, 2025. Grant documents should be available for final signature at the May 12, 2025 City Council meeting. Once the design is completed the City and RCWD will pursue additional construction funding through the program to complete the proposed project. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Project update, no action requited. ATTACHMENTS 1. Shenandoah Feasibility Study 2. Shenandoah Drainage Concept Plan wsb, —� CITY0F IINCilAKES Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report December 7, 2022 Prepared for: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 WSB PROJECT NO. 018901-000 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................. 1 2.0 Project Location....................................................................................... 1 3.0 Site Description....................................................................................... 1 4.0 Identification of Issues.............................................................................. 4 4.1 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL............................................................ 4 4.2 Invasive/Nuisance Vegetation................................................................. 4 4.3 Inefficient Use of Space......................................................................... 4 4.4 Flood plain............................................................................................ 4 5.0 Modeling Methodology.............................................................................. 5 6.0 Concept 1................................................................................................ 7 6.1 Modeling Results................................................................................... 9 6.2 Construction Estimate............................................................................ 9 6.3 Permit Table........................................................................................1 0 7.0 Concept 2...............................................................................................1 0 7.1 Modeling Results..................................................................................1 2 7.2 Construction Estimate...........................................................................12 7.3 Permit Table........................................................................................1 3 8.0 Concept 3...............................................................................................1 3 8.1 Modeling Results..................................................................................1 5 8.2 Construction Estimate...........................................................................15 8.3 Permit Table........................................................................................1 6 9.0 Concept 4...............................................................................................1 6 9.1 Modeling Results..................................................................................1 8 9.2 Construction Estimate...........................................................................1 8 9.3 Permit Table........................................................................................1 9 10.0 Summary/Recommendation....................................................................19 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 '� Introductioi. This report provides the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) with a series of four (4) conceptual designs and associated water quantity and quality models for implementation of best management practices (BMPs) within Shenandoah Park. These designs address water quality within an aged part of the City of Lino Lakes' stormwater conveyance system draining to Rice Lake (AUID 02- 0008-00) which was listed as impaired for nutrients (total phosphorous) in 2010. Shenandoah Park was identified as a location for the installation of BMP retrofits to improve stormwater quality and reduce the volume of stormwater runoff as part of the Rice Lake Subwatershed Stormwater Retrofit Assessment completed in 2010. While this assessment provided site specific information and load reductions, the assessment report indicated that additional modeling was required for the Shenandoah Park stormwater improvements. In addition to developing the conceptual designs discussed in this report, WSB also updated the existing InfoSWMM model used by RCWD, developed a P8 model, generated construction estimates for each of the four (4) concepts, and drafted a list of required permits from local, state, and federal entities. Through a series of meetings with City and Watershed District staff, WSB developed the four (4) concepts discussed in this report to meet the following goals: Reduce total phosphorous (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) loading within the ditch system and to downstream waterbodies, specifically Rice Lake. 2. Enhance the amenities, aesthetics, and recreational opportunities within the park. 3. Increase floodplain volume within the subwatershed. 4. Restore and rehabilitate park vegetation that will provide wetland functional lift. �.0 Project Location The proposed improvements are located within the City owned parcels for Shenandoah Park, in the southwestern corner of Lino Lakes. The street addresses for the parcels containing the proposed work are 475 Arrowhead Dr on the south and 498 Birch St on the north. The surrounding properties are either residential or public right of way, with the exception of an existing stormwater pond east of the park. The project location is within the watershed for Rice Lake, which is situated approximately 1,800 feet north of the park. Site Description The project is proposed on City park property. Currently the southern portion of the site is largely mowed turfgrass with a play area to the east and a grove of trees to the north. Beyond this grove of trees, the majority of the site is vegetated with reed canary grass and nettle. A stormwater BMP was constructed in the upland northern portion of the project location to treat runoff from the reconstruction of Birch St in 2021. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 1 The site is relatively flat, with an elevation difference of approximately 4 feet across the areas of proposed work. A main feature of the site, and driver of this project, is a drainage ditch that flows across the site from south to north. The ditch comes in from a culvert under Arrowhead Dr and takes multiple 90 degree turns, running north, east, north, west, and finally north to a culvert under Birch St. The channel is well vegetated and there don't appear to be any major areas of slope failure or excessive erosion. The upstream culvert from Arrowhead Dr comes in at an elevation of 886.15 feet while the downstream culvert under Birch St has an elevation of 886.05 feet. The 0.1 foot elevation difference across the ditch means it functionally behaves as flat and the drainage in it is essentially ponded and draws down as such. A site visit in September 2022 was used to record the existing natural resources and vegetation conditions of the site. The land north of the east -west portion of the ditch within the project area consists of a Type 2 Fresh Wet Meadow wetland dominated by cattails, likely narrow -leaved (Typha angustifolia). Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) is dominant along the ditch and banks. The land south of the east -west portion of the ditch within the project area is a Type 1/2 Seasonally Flooded/Fresh Wet Meadow wetland dominated by stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). An Aster spp. was also observed in low abundance throughout the site. The southeast stretch of the ditch has native red -osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) along it in moderate density. Overall, the herbaceous layer within the project area has little diversity. A map of the delineated wetland is below. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 2 �P''J — 894 u • I r 7-T -7 tg— U M Existing Storm Sewer l I4. ' ■ Existing CB Existing MH L i i Existing FES ��. 2022 Delineated Wetland � A Birch St BMP 0 Parcels Contours loft 2 Is 89R-- ft Wetland Map N i i v c r Shenandoah Drainage Study 0 150 \^ �C IN —ES City of Lino Lakes Feet V V J finch = 750 feett The very south end of the project area consists of a manicured turf area adjacent to a play structure. Just north of the play structure is an area of mounded soil (of an unknown origin) and mature tree growth. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 3 To the west of this mound is an area containing tree species typical of a transition zone such as aspen (Populus tremuloides). These trees are distressed and rotting. The west side of the turf area has large conifers that provide a screen from the adjacent residential home. Along the west edge of the project area are some existing box elder trees (Acer negundo) and silver maple (Acer saccharinum) and other small to medium sized diverse trees in good condition. Identification of Issues The project area is sited at the intersection of a number of issues facing the City and RCWD. The proposed improvements can be leveraged to address multiple problems at once, the solutions provided by the project will balance the needs of these issues and provide a well-rounded benefit. 4.1 Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Many of the lakes connected by Rice Creek in Lino Lakes fall under a TMDL for excess nutrients. This includes a 2010 TMDL for Rice Lake, the receiving water downstream of the project location. This TMDL estimates a 68-80 percent reduction in TP loading to meet desired nutrient levels. This comes to an approximate reduction of over 9,300 pounds of TP. Much of this loading improvement may come from addressing upstream or internal phosphorous loading, however any reduction in TP is a net positive. As proposed, this project will result in a considerable reduction of TP loading to Rice Lake. Invasive/Nuisance Vegetation The existing wetlands within the project area are dominated by monotypic stands of cattails (likely invasive or hybrid) or stinging nettle with very low diversity and species richness. Along the ditch, invasive reed canary grass has prevented the growth of native vegetation. 4.3 Inefficient Use of Space The project space is currently very segmented, with the ditch, wetland, and park components separate from each other. There exists a great opportunity for a multifaceted approach at this site for water quality, ecological, floodplain, recreational, and educational benefits. However, these benefits are either not being realized or only realized on an individual basis as -is. One major issue outlined by the City is a lack of connection between the well - developed trail system to the south and the trail system along Birch St to the north. Connecting these systems would also allow for better pedestrian access through the City and help to achieve its planning goals. 4.4 Floodplain As the downstream end of a stormwater system serving over 200 acres of drainage area, the site has high potential for flooding. As modeled in existing conditions, the 100-year flood elevation is 892.15 feet. This high-water level approaches the lowest floor elevations of homes on Totem Trl. and Arrowhead Dr., putting these homes at risk of flooding. Proposed project basins would lower this high-water level and decrease the risk of homes flooding. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 4 Modeling Methodolog, One of the major components of stormwater design for this project is hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. This consists of modeling to understand how much water is flowing through the site, what the peak rates and velocities of the flow reaches are, and how high flood levels will be. InfoSWMM software was used for this modeling in the project. RCWD has developed an InfoSWMM model for the project location and upstream stormwater infrastructure. A part of this project was updating the model based on City as-builts and stormwater system updates since its original creation. There were two existing ponds added to the model. BAL-012-A and an unnamed pond in Birchwood Acres Park. BAL-012-A was assumed to flow west to Baldwin Lake but based on City as-builts it actually outlets south to pond RLA-012-A and ultimately reaches Shenandoah Park and Rice Lake. The unnamed pond does not have as -built documents, so storage was estimated based on Anoka County LiDAR data flown in 2011. Another update to model existing conditions was a change to the outlet of the Shenandoah ditch under Birch St. The 36 inch RCP in the model was changed to reflect the 24 inch RCP that is there currently. Other smaller changes included updating basin storage based on as -built contours if available or 2011 LiDAR data otherwise. An overview map of the model area in question is below. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 5 Birch St _ -ar�ss w�...�•c-�Bi�cti;St—'��' •�'�' ap -A x=_ • 1" t 54 K 8 IE.J. .""OwheadD e•�j: ,4. 3s .. �: ' .{ • �,fi-. _fir :;�>� " i-t Ir NIM �•��,x sam 3 �,,_ �'►< t 1, fi r "r' S f � : s •J k' 1 ! i. Ir.a 3• 3 ; y 1 . -nCa�.Y2 l � �• D I M1•' i <MEf s1.� �,J ist., tt' v ModelOverview Shenandoah.. - Study 1 A 11 Feet •1 City of Lino Lakes inch 500 feet InfoSWMM modeling was also generated for the proposed project improvements. This was done to understand the benefits to outflow rates and flood levels in the pond system that may be realized as a result of this project. Generally, it was found that adding storage downstream in Shenandoah Park resulted in flow rate decreases under Birch St and reductions in flood levels through the system. These flood Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 6 elevation reductions were greatest at the project location but decreased in effect for ponds further upstream. The other major component of stormwater design for this project was in water quality improvements. This modeling seeks to understand what pollutant loading and removals can be expected based on the watershed characteristics and stormwater basins in the system. P8 software was used for water quality modeling. This involved creating an existing conditions P8 model from scratch as there was not one already generated for this drainage area. Pollutant loading was determined based on subwatershed areas and impervious surface fractions. Pollutant removals were determined based on pond as -built conditions. Under existing conditions, the drainage system upstream of the ditch removes nearly 22,500 lb of TSS and approximately 48.5 lb of TP each year. For proposed conditions, the P8 models were updated to include the proposed improvements with each concept. For the sake of water quality modeling, these BMPs were assumed to function as infiltration basins, where captured pollutant volumes are fully removed from the stormwater system. Existing soils onsite are likely silty sands, providing an infiltration rate of approximately 0.45 in/hr based on the MN Stormwater Manual. However, based on past soil borings and County groundwater data, it is assumed inconsistent and minimal infiltration will be achievable in the basins due to the shallow depth of the water table in the area. Modeling conservatively assumed an infiltration rate of 0.01 in/hr, the minimum allowable in P8. Actual infiltration averaged over the year may be higher than this based on water table fluctuations. Additionally, P8 modeling does not factor in pollutant removals from evapotranspiration and vegetation uptake, both of which will be emphasized with proposed improvements. Therefore, it is likely that pollutant removals, TP in particular, will be higher than the results given but are difficult to quantify. The results of the modeling described above are summarized in the proposed concepts below. 6.P Concept 1 Concept 1 is based directly on the proposed improvements from the 2010 Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment developed by the Anoka Conservation District. There are three wetland basins of roughly similar sizes that receive water from the ditch during medium to high flow events. Water is allowed to equalize between the basins and draws down very slowly over time via evapotranspiration and slow infiltration through the hydric soils. Captured water is kept in the basins after ditch levels draw down by virtue of one-way flap gates or duckbill valves on the inlets from the ditch. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 7 - •`' � A 8 Overflow Weir e Structure Invert 888 A _ �I J[ w A This concept is based on the RCWD 2010 Rice Lake Subwatershed Assessment One way flow structures let water in during increased flow levels and do not allow flows out when the ditch level drops. Water retained in BMP draws down via evapotranspiration. r Proposed Storm Sewer Existing Storm Sewer Existing CB Existing MH Existing FES Wetland Basin Parcels Contours 10 ft 2 It ,1 BMP Map - Concept 1 Shenandoah Drainage Study 0 60 \ /t �C LNGKES City of Lino Lakes Feet V V J 1 inch = 60 feet This system is not optimized for the full benefits that the site has to offer. It does not use all the space available that the City has to work with and does not provide any improvements to the ditch system. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 8 It does afford space for a pathway between the wetlands and educational interaction points. Concept 1 generally works, but can be improved upon to achieve the greatest site benefits. 6.1 Moaelling Kesults TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 758 4.21 891.43 0.72 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 1 shows the least benefits of all options due to its smaller basin footprint. 6.2 Construction tstimate The main driver of costs for all the provided concepts are excavation costs. Concept 1 calls for approximately 3000 cubic yards of excavation, driving about 50 percent of the construction costs. Other major costs include the construction of associated storm sewer and vegetation restoration across the site. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $170,250. Monitoring and maintenance of the site's natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Construction Cost - Option 1 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,000 $10,000 —10•� of total budget COMMON EXCAVATION CY 3000 $17.50 $52,500 Essentially all cut and removal from site RANDOM RIPRAP CL III CY 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets 12" RCP L F 190 $90 $17,100 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 2.00 $1,500 $3,000 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 1 2.00 $3,000 $6,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE LF 810 $3.50 $2,835 Need around grading+40'to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 3000 $3 $9,000 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 1.4 $2,000 $2,800 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 24 $10 $240 Seeding over access road SEED MIX 34-261 LB 40 $75 $3,000 Seeding wetland/pond areas 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED ITREE 60 $400 $24,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT ISHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MON ITORI NG/MAI NTENANCE I LS 1 $42,980 $42,880 20% Contingency 1 $28,375 Total: 1 $170,250 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 9 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days ',0 Concept 2 Concept 2 builds on the wetland basins described in Concept 1, but with an emphasis on maximizing water quality benefits. The proposed basins are maximized to fill as much of the available space and provide the largest area for evapotranspiration and infiltration. One-way inlets are again proposed to allow water to flow in from the ditch but prevent backflow once water levels draw back down in it. The ditch channel is not proposed to be shifted in this concept. This concept results in the greatest pollutant removal and increase in floodplain capacity. However, that comes at the cost of losing educational and recreational opportunities with the basins. In addition, maximizing basin volume does not provide much diversity in potential wetland improvements as much of it will consist of wet marsh conditions. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 10 U N� 0 T y� OVA P. Proposed Storm Sewr Existing Storm Sewer '` ■ Existing CB t • Existing MH Existing FES _ Wetland Basin Birch St BMP Parcels Contours This concept maximizes water quality volume and maintains the one way inlet and ,1 10 ft evapotranspiration drawdown. 1 2 ft BMP Map - Concept 2 C 17 YA90 F Shenandoah Drainage Study 0 100 C Y1 LO NKES City ot ncn = 10o feet f Lino Lakes Feet V V J b 1y � Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 11 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 1,416 9.05 891.28 0.87 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 2 shows the greatest benefits of all options due to its largest basin footprint. 7.2 Construction Estimate Again, the main driver of costs is excavation, even more so for this concept since basin size is maximized. Concept 2 calls for nearly 15,000 cubic yards of excavation, driving about 80 percent of the construction costs. As with Concept 1, other major costs include the construction of associated storm sewer and vegetation restoration across the site. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $410,000. Monitoring and maintenance of the site's natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Construction Cost - Option 2 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $20,000 $20,000 "'10%oftotalbudget, slightly lower b/csimpler COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 14750 $17.50 $258,125 Essentially all cut and removal from site RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 10 $120.00 $1,200 For inlets 12" RCP L F 70 $90 $6,300 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 2.00 $1,500 $3,000 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 2.00 $3,000 $6,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Dr SILT FENCE LF 1,060 $3.50 $3,710 Need around grading + 40'to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 3620 $3 $10,860 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 1 2.6 $2,000 $5,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 24 $10 $240 Seeding over access road, 120 lb/ac SEED MIX 34-261 LB 80 $75 $6,000 Seeding wetland/pond areas, 31.5lb/ac 1.5" CALTREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 30 $400 $12,000 Based on OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 $7,500 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MONITORING/MAINTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 $42,880 20%Contingency 1 68,327 Total: 1 $409,962 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 12 Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days R_n Concept 3 Concept 3 involves the most holistic improvements for the project, providing benefits to water quality, floodplain management, site ecology, recreation, and education. There are four proposed basins of varying size and depth, providing a variety of wetland environments and water levels. As with the other concepts, water is proposed to enter the basins via one-way inlets. The larger basins are proposed to be of greater depth, allowing for increased water quality volumes to be treated and further reductions in flood elevations. Another major component of this concept is the realignment of the ditch channel through the park. The proposed channel would be approximately the same length, but follow a more natural and winding route instead of the sharp 90 degree turns, reducing drastic velocity changes and the associated potential erosion. Concept 3 would also allow for the playground area in the park to be more easily accessible to Arrowhead Trail and also potentially afford some parking spaces in the space freed up by the ditch realignment. The concept also has potential space for boardwalks or trails through much of the park, providing recreational and educational opportunities through the large and varying spaces of restored wetlands, and providing a pedestrian connection from Arrowhead Tr. to Birch St. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 13 • i 89 l_ c 31 a. 902 T. J �r �r Proposed Storm Sewer Existing Storm Sewer s` i' ■ Existing CB -- _ - �' ~ �r • Existing MH • Existing FES �q, a • -- - 8ya Wetland Basin » . , Birch St BMP rAli A W� 4 J 0 Parcels P.- is ` Contours This concept is based around a realignment of the ditch channel to resemble a 10 ft natural stream. Basins around the stream would fill via one way inlet when water .r'yc, levels rise and draw down via evapotranspiration. -22.9 2 ft BMP Map - Concept 3 u t T o f Shenandoah Drainage Study 0 150 \^ �C �N KE City of Lino Lakes � Feet V V J 1 inch = 150 feet Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 14 " " Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 1,297 8.37 891.30 0.85 The results above are based on the P8 and InfoSWMM modeling for this project. The proposed wetland basins provided water quality improvements in accordance with their footprint and volume, TSS and TP removals shown are increases over existing modeled pollutant removals. The drop in ditch high water level is also a function of basin volume. As such, Concept 3 shows the slightly decreased benefits compared to Concept 2, but they are still significant. 8.2 Construction Estimate Excavation costs still dominate the estimate project total under this concept, but less so than Concept 2. 12,500 cubic yards of excavation are proposed, but this would be slightly offset with the proposed embankment volumes to fill in the old ditch channel. Earthwork estimates account for about 70 percent of total improvement costs. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $455,350. It should be noted the construction estimate does not include potential recreational improvements such as a boardwalk or trail. Monitoring and maintenance of the site's natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Construction Cost - Option 3 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $30,000 $30,000 —10%oftotal budget COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 12500 $17.50 $218,750 Essentially all cut and removal from site COMMON EMBANKMENT CY 600 $17.50 $10,500 Fill old channel RANDOM RIPRAP CL III C Y 20 $120.00 $2,400 For inlets 12" RCP L F 240 $90 $21,600 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 5.00 $1,500 $7,500 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 4.00 $3,000 $12,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1.00 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Or SILT FENCE L F 400 $3.50 $1,400 Need around grading + 40'to double up at culvert outlet EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 9500 $3 $28,500 Placed on all pond slopes (top contour area - bottom contour area) SEEDING ACRE 3.6 $2,000 $7,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus over access route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 55 $10 $550 Seeding over access road and old channel, 120 Ib/ac SEED MIX 34-261 LB 100 $75 $7,500 Seeding wetland/pond/channel areas, 31.5lb/ac LIVE STAKES EACH 210 $3 1 $544 iStabilization along erosive edge of realigned ditch 1.5" CAL TREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 55 $400 1 $22,000 113asedon OneOffice SHRUB - 5 GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 1 $7,500 1 Based on OneOffice 5 YEAR MON ITORI NG/MAI NTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 1 $42,880 201/o Contingency $75,889 Total: 1 $455,333 Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 15 " " Permit Table Permit Agency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Rice Creek Watershed District 40 days Wetland Conservation Act No Loss Rice Creek Watershed District 60 days 9.0 Concept A Concept 4 would consist of improvements largely focused on water quality benefits. Improvements would involve construction of an iron -enhanced sand filter (IESF) to treat the currently untreated runoff from Totem Tr., Hokah Dr., and Rice Ct., west of Shenandoah Park. This concept is proposed in conjunction with Concept 3, but it could also work in a modified capacity on its own or with Concept 1 or 2. All removals, floodplain benefits, and cost estimates factor in Concept 3 base elements and the IESF. As proposed, the IESF BMP would cover approximately 5,000 square feet with a basin bottom elevation of 887.4 feet. This elevation is based on a slightly raised invert of the outlet pipe for drainage coming off the roadway. Incoming stormwater would gravity flow through the filter media and outlet to the ditch via draintile. The manhole upstream of this outlet pipe is proposed with a 3 feet sump to provide pretreatment prior to flows reaching the IESF. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 16 i + � a b BMP Outlet Control Structure ` S 4 — Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Draintile „ Existing Storm Sewer ■ Existing CB !` • Existing MH • % ♦ Existing FES Wetland Basin IESF i.� Parcels Contours Runoff from the western roadways would be treated in the proposed iron -enhanced 10 ft sand filter and outlet to the ditch via perforated draintile. This concept is an addition to the wetland basins in Concept 3. 2 ft BMP Map - Concept 4 Shenandoah Drainage Study 0 60 \ /� /C LbKE City of Lino Lakes � Feet V V J 1 inch = 60 feet Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 17 Modeling Results TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) 5,688 19.75 891.30 0.85 The results above are based on the P8 modeling for this project. The IESF is proposed primarily for water quality benefits, as proposed it would have a negligible impact on floodplain volumes and water levels and therefore, they were unchanged from Concept 3. As shown in the results, this concept would greatly increase TSS and TP removals while taking up a relatively small footprint within the overall project area. Combined with Concept 3, TP removals are near 20 pounds per year. 9.2 Construction r-stimate As with Concept 3, excavation costs still dominate the estimated project. Earthwork quantities are slightly increased with the proposed IESF, but its volume is much less than the other wetland basins. Other major costs include the specialized iron - enhanced filter media and replacement of storm sewer. The total estimated concept cost, including a 20 percent cost contingency, is $601,000. Again, this construction estimate does not include potential recreational improvements such as a boardwalk or trail. Refer to the budget table at the end of this section for the base construction cost line item breakdown. Monitoring and maintenance of the site's natural resources will be key to establishing a diverse, native plant community. Site maintenance includes a minimum of two site visits (spring and fall) for five years to conduct mowing and herbicide spot treatments, and supplemental seeding during one of the recommended five years. The cost of maintenance for five years as described is $34,380. Monitoring the vegetation each year would provide the City with an adaptive management approach to maintenance. The cost of monitoring one time per year for five years is $8,500. Current design standards assume an approximate 10-year lifespan for effective pollutant capture of an IESF BMP. This lifespan can be extended with filter media replacement. The estimated cost of replacement is $45,000. This includes costs for removal of old media, installation of new iron -enhanced sand, and a 20 percent contingency. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 18 Construction Cost - Option 4 Description Units Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Price Comments MOBILIZATION LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 " 10%oftotal budget COMMON EXCAVATION CY 13000 $17.50 $227,500 Essentially all cut and removal from site COMMON EMBANKMENT CY 850 $17.50 $14,875 Berm and old channel fill SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CY 100 $30.00 $3,000 Filtersand FILTER MEDIA SPECIAL CY 170 $175.00 $29,750 5% by weight iron enhanced sand RANDOM RIPRAP CL III CY 30 $120.00 $3,600 For inlets/outlets 6" PERF HDPE PIPE LF 250 $24.00 $6,000 BMP underdrain 6" PERF HDPE PIPE CLEANOUT EACH 1 2 $500.00 $1,000 Underdraincleanout 12" RCP L F 250 $90 $22,500 Based on OneOffice 12" RCP APRON EACH 6 $1,500 $9,000 Based on OneOffice 30" RCP L F 148 $150.00 $22,200 Based on OneOffice, replace pipe from Totem 30" RCP APRON EACH 1 $2,500 $2,500 Based on OneOffice FLAP GATE/DUCKBILL VALVE EACH 4 $3,000 $12,000 Based on OneOffice, no duckbill estimate 48" OCS EACH 1 $7,500 $7,500 Based on OneOffice, IESF outlet 60" MH L F 1 7 $1,000 $7,000 Based on OneOffice, replace in Totem GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SY 800.00 $3 $2,400 Between IEsand and regularsand STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1 $1,500 $1,500 Likely off Arrowhead Or SILT FENCE LF 900 $3.50 $3,150 Around filterand downstream of grading EROSION CONTROL BLANKET S Y 10000 $3 $30,000 Placed on graded slopes SEEDING ACRE 3.6 $2,000 $7,200 Assume seeding occurs within full limits of disturbance plus overaccess route SEED MIX 25-151 LB 1 55 $10 $550 Seeding overaccess road and old channel, 120 SEED MIX 34-261 LB 100 $75 $7,500 Seeding wetland/pond/channel areas, 31.5lb/ac LIVE STAKES EACH 210 $3 $544 Stabilization along erosive edge of realigned ditch 1.5" CALTREE - BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREE 55 $400 1 $22,000 lBased on 0 eOffice SHRUB-5GAL POT SHRB 100 $75 1 $7,500 1 Based on OneOffice SYEAR MON ITORING/MAI NTENANCE LS 1 $42,880 1 $42,880 20%Contingency 1 5100,154 Total: 1 $600,923 9.3 Permit Table Permit JAgency Timeline to Approval Federal Section 404 NWP 27 US Army Corps 60-90 days Local Rice Creek Watershed Rice Creek Watershed 40 days District Permit District Wetland Conservation Rice Creek Watershed 60 days Act De Minimis District Exemption and No Loss 10.0 Summary/Recommendation All concepts described in this report provide improvements to the existing site vegetation, water quality, and floodplain levels. However, each concept strikes a difference balance of the above in addition to providing potential consideration to recreational benefits for residents on Lino Lakes. The site stormwater benefits are summarized for consideration in the table below. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 19 BMP Option Ditch 100-yr HWL HWL Decrease (ft) TSS Removal (lb/yr) TP Removal (lb/yr) Existing 892.15 N/A N/A N/A Concept 1 891.44 0.72 758 4.21 Concept 2 891.29 0.87 1,416 9.05 Concept 3 891.31 0.85 1,297 8.37 Concept 4 891.31 0.85 5,688 19.75 A major component of assessing BMP cost efficiency is the estimated cost divided by the provided pounds of TP removal. The proposed improvements were evaluated with a 25-year lifespan. Costs over the lifetime included full construction cost, 5 years of vegetation maintenance, annual BMP maintenance, and any major maintenance costs. These costs and the price per pound of TP are summarized in the table below. Annual TP 5-year Annual BMP Major 25-year BMP Removal Construction Vegetation Maintenance O&M Cost/Pound Option (Ib) Cost Maintenance Cost Cost TP Cost Concept 1 4.21 $170,250 $42,880 $100 $0 $2,049 Concept 2 9.05 $410,000 $42,880 $200 $0 $2,024 Concept 3 8.37 $455,350 $42,880 $200 $0 $2,405 Concept 4 19.75 $601,000 $42,880 $300 $45,000 $1,410 All concepts proposed provide improvements in varying degrees. Concept 1 provides lower benefits but comes at a lower cost and would entail a smaller amount of disturbance to existing site conditions. Concept 2 maximizes basin size and associated pollutant removals, but at an increased cost and with no broader improvements to the park. Concept 3 provides large basin sizes, ditch realignment similar to a natural channel, and potential recreational benefits, but with a greater cost and major site disturbance. Concept 4 provides similar benefits in addition to the best cost per pound of TP removal, but at a significant upfront cost and higher long term maintenance needs. This report recommends the City consider the improvements in Concept 4. The proposed work would allow for high degrees of wetland improvements in large basins that would also serve to reduce flood levels. Ditch realignment would further serve to enhance these natural resources benefits while also providing options for a greenway trail system and educational opportunities around the merits of stormwater treatment and wetland ecosystems. Finally, the proposed IESF would provide exceptional pollutant treatment and the best price per pound of TP removed. With the wide degree of benefits and greatest price -quantified water quality improvement, Concept 4 would also be a strong candidate to receive grant funding to help the City offset its construction costs. However, WSB will be happy to support the City in pursuing further design of any concept proposed. Shenandoah Improvements Feasibility Report City of Lino Lakes, MN WSB Project No. 018901-000 Page 20 .. r L (BIRCH STREET M 1- A a I �1 iri 1 0 CO C- a) U) 0 0 0 00 0 i 1 U Q CD IL ' 0 Shenandoah Drainage Concept Plan 0 s Lino Lakes, MN September 15, 2023 WSB Project number: 018901-000 0' 25' 50' 100' Scale in Feet wsb CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Birchwood Acres Pond Treatment Background Staff has received feedback from concerned residents regarding the aesthetic quality of storm pond RLA-010-B located in Birchwood Acres Park. This pond treats stormwater runoff from nearly 70 properties located primarily on Hawthorn Road and Lonesome Pine Trail in the Park Grove development. Communication has gone back several years to deal with concerns of vegetation, smell, and stormwater management. The main concerns include the vegetation that covers the surface of the pond and odor. The vegetation present on this pond is primarily duckweed, which provides water purification by incorporating nutrients. It is also an important food source for wildlife. The odor is primarily due to decomposition of plants and algae. In response to residents' concerns, city staff took steps to ensure the pond was functioning properly. The city also initiated water quality sampling to check phosphorous levels in September of 2020. The phosphorous detected was at levels typical for stormwater ponds. The pond was also surveyed in July of 2021 to determine its functionality in terms of stormwater management. The survey and associated analysis found that the pond is functional and does not require additional maintenance at this time. The maintenance recommendation from WSB, the City's Engineer, was to maintain this pond at its current level. The inlet and outlet structures were deemed functional and not in need of additional maintenance at this time. Staff provided residents with other alternatives to improve water quality and aesthetics of the pond. 1. Good landscaping and yard care habits remain the best tool at the residents' disposal to limit pollutant loading in the pond. These practices include limiting fertilizer use in lawns, cleaning up after pets, washing vehicles on the lawn rather than the driveway, reducing deicing salt use, and preventing grass and leaves from entering the stormwater system. Most residents living with back yards abutting the pond do have some vegetative buffers in place, which should help limit nutrients from the closest back yards from reaching the lake 2. Mechanical removal of vegetation would involve the physical removal of vegetation with a skimming device or nets. This would remove some of the nutrients from the pond, and it would have similar results to herbicide and algaecide application without the negative impacts associated with chemical use. Residents have expressed interest in treating this pond, citing the aesthetic quality of two ponds on private land nearby that receive treatments with algaecide and herbicide. These are storm pond RLA-013-A, located south of the Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, and an unnamed pond located directly north of Birchwood Acres Park ballfield. Residents have petitioned 100% of the adjacent private property of the pond and agreed to share in the cost of treatments privately. There would be no cost to the city for the residents to privately treat the pond. They have received a proposal from Lake Management, Inc. to complete the treatment. The proposal is attached. ANAI VCIC The City of Lino Lakes is permitted as a Municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). In order to discharge stormwater into the storm sewer system and ultimately into surface waters the city is required to meet six minimum control measures (MCM). MCM 5 requires post construction stormwater management. This relates to the water entering the storm sewer and being treated by city bmp's or in this case stormwater ponds. Stormwater ponds are designed to capture sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants to settle them out of the water column before discharging to adjacent wetlands, lakes, and streams. Stormwater ponds contain nutrients and through plant growth helps to absorb the phosphorus. This is typical of stormwater ponds and an indication that the pond is performing as intended and capturing pollutants that would otherwise reach surface waters. The concern of treating a city owned pond is that the treatment could have a negative impact of the stormwater leaving the pond. This could lead to pollution and sedimentation downstream. The city would be liable for any impacts caused by the treatment to the cities stormwater management system. Requested Council Direction Discussion Attachments 1. Project Location 2. Petition on signatures 3. Letter to residents 4. Proposal Gm w1liv; ►t , 1Am i Lie 3�r _it 1' Ropus w z T, •7 wow 'S !- i I t... •7f s� 41 a� ! - Amak, 7n i Pond at Birchwood Park — List of Residents Karen Jamison & Gunilla Ekeling 526 Linden Lane Jim & Cindy Sandberg 530 Linden Lane Leo & Jean Dehmer 534 Linden Lane Robert & Mary Olson 538 Linden Lane Aleksey Kurdyumov 542 Linden Lane Hope & Kim Kuck 546 Linden Lane Shelly Stetson 550 Linden Lane Jim and Cathey Schorzmann 552 Linden Lane John Gray 556 Lonesome Pine Trail Tom & Julie Cutts 560 Lonesome Pine Trail Curt & Mary Sell 564 Lonesome Pine Trail Pat & Kathy Huelman 570 Lonesome Pine Trail KJAMIA,comcast.net 651-231-4712 JJSandbergkq.com ? Leo Dehmerkhotmail.com 651-769-4215 bertm4aolson(a comcast.net 651-486-9892 ALKurd, u�(@gmail.com 651-793-8053 kimskuckkjzmail.com ? liveformypatio@yahoo.com 612-859-1833 waldo55014kyahoo.com 651-366-7002 ? 651-414-0933 trcutts(d`gmail.com 612-655-5575 mka@kmsn.com 612-802-0877 phuelmangumn.edu 651-484-1427 ram. CITY'{ OF JINOKE Memorandum To: Residents Near Birchwood Acres Pond From: Andy Nelson, Environmental Coordinator Date: 5/16/22 Re: Birchwood Acres Pond Stormwater ponds are designed to provide water quality and water quantity treatment for stormwater runoff to prevent pollutants from reaching lakes, rivers, and streams. When these ponds are first constructed, the water will be relatively clear because there are initially few pollutants. As fertilizer, salt, pet waste, and other pollutants accumulate over time, the ponds can become green and may have an odor. This is typical of stormwater ponds and an indication that the pond is performing as intended and capturing pollutants that would otherwise head to surface waters. City staff have received feedback from concerned residents regarding the aesthetic quality of storm pond RLA-010-B located in Birchwood Acres Park. This pond treats stormwater runoff from nearly 70 properties located primarily on Hawthorn Road and Lonesome Pine Trail in the Park Grove development. The main concerns include the vegetation that covers the surface of the pond and odor. The vegetation present on this pond is primarily duckweed, which provides water purification by incorporating nutrients. It is also an important food source for wildlife. The odor is primarily due to decomposition of plants and algae. In response to residents' concerns, city staff took steps to ensure the pond was functioning properly. The city also initiated water quality sampling to check phosphorous levels in September of 2020. The phosphorous detected was at levels typical for stormwater ponds. The pond was also surveyed in July of 2021 to determine its functionality in terms of stormwater management. The survey and associated analysis found that the pond is functional and does not require additional maintenance at this time. The maintenance recommendation from WSB, the City's Engineer, was to maintain this pond at its current level. The inlet and outlet structures were deemed functional and not in need of additional maintenance at this time. Residents have expressed interest in treating this pond, citing the aesthetic quality of two ponds on private land nearby that receive treatments with algaecide and herbicide. These are storm pond RLA-013-A, located south of the Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, and an unnamed pond located directly north of Birchwood Acres Park ballfield. Staff is not in favor of chemical treatment of the pond for the following reasons: 1. Copper is a common component of many chemicals used to treat ponds. When copper accumulates in sediment it may have to be disposed of at a landfill, which increases cost to the city. 2. Herbicides and algaecides have negative impacts on wildlife. Even if acute toxicity may be limited for certain chemicals, chronic, long-term wildlife impacts are more uncertain. 3. The treatments do not reduce the pollutant load in the stormwater ponds. Stormwater management function of ponds is not improved through algaecide/herbicide treatments. 4. The plants that grow in these ponds are incorporating pollutants, such as phosphorous, into their tissues. To kill these plants would eliminate the positive water purification impact. Staff have provided a few options that residents could undertake to improve the aesthetics of the pond: 1. Good landscaping and yard care habits remain the best tool at the residents' disposal to limit pollutant loading in the pond. These practices include limiting fertilizer use in lawns, cleaning up after pets, washing vehicles on the lawn rather than the driveway, reducing deicing salt use, and preventing grass and leaves from entering the stormwater system. Most residents living with back yards abutting the pond do have some vegetative buffers in place, which should help limit nutrients from the closest back yards from reaching the lake. 2. Install an aerator to improve circulation of water and aid decomposition of organic matter. 3. Mechanical removal of vegetation would involve the physical removal of vegetation with a skimming device or nets. This would remove some of the nutrients from the pond, and it would have similar results to herbicide and algaecide application without the negative impacts associated with chemical use. If residents are still interested in chemical treatments of this pond, this may be an option on a pilot basis, pending City Council approval, given the following conditions: 1. Treatments will be 100% funded by residents choosing to participate. 2. A majority of residents abutting the pond must be in agreement. If residents are in favor of pursuing the option of chemical treatments, please send a form with signatures of all residents who are in favor to: Andy Nelson Environmental Coordinator ANelson3@linolakes.us LAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. Minnesota Operations 10400 1851'' Street North Marine on St. Croix, MN 55047 (651) 433-3283 Phone Fax # (651) 433-5316 Email: infoWakemanagementinc.com PROPOSAL FOR AQUATIC NUISANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2025 Submitted to: Date: September 11, 2024 Mary Sell 564 Lonesome Pine Trail Phone: (612) 802-0877 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Email: mkaysell@msn.com Lake Management, Inc. proposes to furnish at its expense, all of the necessary materials, subject to state and federal regulations, equipment and labor as well as to direct and administer treatment as needed for the control of the excessive growth of submerged and floating aquatic weeds and algae in the water area described as follows: 2025 Aquatic Management Program — Pond (2.5a) located at 564 Lonesome Pine Trail, Lino Lakes, MN Seasonal Maintenance Program......................................................................$2,038.00 Two -week inspection/application intervals, mid -May through mid -September. Includes phosphorus binding applications for nutrient reduction. Bio-augmentation applications included for sediment reduction and water clarity. Aquatic colorants/dyes included and applied upon request. Lake Management uses only EPA approved, Minnesota DNR allowed products. In consideration of the goods and materials furnished, use of equipment and services rendered, payment is to be: Two Thousand Thirty -Eight and 00/100 Dollars ($2,038.00) Terms: Net April 1, 2025 Note: Our seasonal contract begins approximately May 15`h and ends September 15'. If applications are required outside of seasonal contract dates or an additional treatment is requested, a minimum $249.00 charge may apply. Questions about our program or special requests should be directed to: Mike O'Connell at (651) 433-3283. In rare cases, large amounts of decomposing algae could cause a reduction in dissolved oxygen, placing fish at risk. While loss of fish is extremely rare, Lake Management Inc. cannot be responsible for such an occurrence. Please notify Lake Management if fish are present. Lake Management, Inc. carries insurance for both liability and property damage and workers' compensation and will, upon request, confirm that coverage by certificates issued to the customer. This proposal may be withdrawn by Lake Management, Inc. if not accepted within 30 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above payment and conditions are satisfactory and are accepted. Lake Management, Inc. is authorized to conduct the management program described above. Payment will be made as indicated above. Signature Date Representing CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: 1-35E & CR J Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County BACKGROUND Ramsey County is preparing to solicit bids and award a contract for the improvements for I- 35E/CR J interchange improvements. The overall project cost is estimated at $23,761,410.60. Federal funds are available for the Project and are capped at $19,000,000.00. The City's share of the proposed improvements is $318,509.60. This includes pro rata share of right-of-way, drainage, utility and roadway improvements. The City's share is funded primarily from Municipal State Aid Street funds with a small portion of funding from the Area and Unit Trunk Utility funds. Area and Unit funds will be reimbursed from developer fees charged with development of the northwest quadrant of the Centerville Road/CRJ intersection. Under the terms of the agreement the City is responsible for maintenance of the storm water pond in the NE quadrant of Centerville Road/CRJ intersection, the cost of which is split between City and Ramsey County based on contributing area. Lino Lakes will also be responsible for the trail on the west side of Centerville Road along with the crosswalk pavement markings on City streets, if applicable. The City will be responsible for maintenance of Centerville Road/CRJ roundabout. Staff is still reviewing responsibilities with maintenance of the interchange roundabouts and street lighting. The City will be entering into the agreement with Anoka County. Anoka County and Ramsey County will have a master agreement in place covering the overall project costs. Landscaping improvements to the Centerville/CRJ roundabout are in addition to these costs. The portion of the project will likely be bid in 2026. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Council direction to place approval of the JPA on the May 12, 2025 meeting agenda pending resolution of the interchange roundabout and street lighting maintenance and electric costs. ATTACHMENTS Draft JPA Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY (CSAH) 21 (CENTERVILLE ROAD), CSAH 54 (20TH AVE S) AND COUNTY ROAD 84 (OTTER LAKE ROAD) AS PART OF THE COUNTY J AND I-35E INTERCHANGE PROJECT IN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MN Minnesota Department of Transportation SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47 Ramsey County Project Nos. SP 062-601-017 and SP 062-659-020 Anoka County Project Nos. SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005 and SP 210-020-015 THIS AGREEMENT is made by the parties on the last date executed below, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, hereinafter referred to as "City". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement agree it is in the best interest of the traveling public to reconstruct CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Ave S) and CR 84 (Otter Lake Road) as part of the County Road J and I-35E interchange project led by Ramsey County and, WHEREAS, said parties mutually agree that CSAH 21, CSAH 54 and CR 84 are in need of reconstruction; and, WHEREAS, Ramsey County as the lead agency of the County Road J and I-35Interchange project has prepared preliminary design plans for the reconstruction of CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Avenue S.) and CR84 (Otter Lake Road) in accordance with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards to a staff approved layout condition; and, WHEREAS, Anoka County has jurisdiction over CSAH 21 (Centerville Road), CSAH 54 (20th Avenue S.) and CR86 (Otter Lake Road) and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be shared; and, WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions of the state to enter into joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: PTMPOSR The parties have joined together for the purpose of reconstructing the roadway, drainage and trail as well as other utilities for County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) from Centerville Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 51/Anoka County State Aid Highway 21) to Otter Lake Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 60/Anoka County Road 84) including the I-35E interchange and intersection of County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) and 20th Avenue South (Anoka Anoka County Contract No. C00o 11514 County State Aid Highway 54). The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) state project numbers are SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47; the Ramsey County project numbers are SP 062-601-017, SP 062-659-020; the Anoka County project numbers are SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005 and the Lino Lakes project number is SP 210-020-015 (collectively the "Project'). Said engineering plans are filed in the office of the Ramsey County Public Works Department and Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference. The parties to this Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) agree in principle that the Project is in the best interest of the traveling public and that the Construction Plan Title Sheet as shown in Exhibit "A" defines the final design of the Project. All Exhibits attached to or referred to in this JPA are incorporated by reference and made part of this Agreement. II. METHOD Ramsey County as lead agency for the project shall cause the construction of State Project number SP 6281-53 and SP 0282-47 Anoka County Project CP21-15-00, SP 002-621-012, SP 002-654-005, Ramsey County Project SP 062-601-017 and 062-659-020 and City project number SP 210-020-015. IMPROVEMENTS: It is agreed by the parties that in 2025/2026, County Road J will be reconstructed from Centerville Road (Anoka County State Aid Highway 21, Ramsey County State Aid Highway 59) to Otter Lake Road (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 60/Anoka County Road 84)including the I-35E interchange and intersection of County Road J (Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1) and 20th Avenue South (Anoka County State Aid Highway 54), as shown in "Exhibit A". Improvements include, but are not limited to: roadway widening, roundabout construction, bridge construction, concrete median, storm sewer and associated ponding, turn lanes, shoulders, lighting, bituminous trails, retaining walls and concrete curb & gutter. INTERSECTIONS: As agreed by the parties, improvements to the following intersections have been incorporated in the Exhibit "A" design: Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 60 / Anoka County Road 84 / I-35E east ramps: Roundabout Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 54 / I-35E west ramps: Roundabout Ramsey County State Aid Highway 1 / Ramsey County State Aid Highway 59 / Anoka County State Aid Highway 21 /: Roundabout RIGHT OF WAY: The parties agree that the County will acquire all necessary right-of-way and easements for the Project. Acquisition of any additional right-of-way and/or easements needed for improvements to the city street 2 Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 intersections beyond what is defined in the Exhibit "A" Layout will be the responsibility of the city. It is agreed by the parties that all necessary right of way and easements will be in legal possession of the County -lead agency prior to acceptance of bids for the project. Any City owned property or easements required for the construction will be conveyed to the County at no cost. DRAINAGE: The City shall pay for a percentage of the cost of the storm sewer system, including the detention basins and their outlet structures. The city portion of the cost is based on contributing flow through the storm sewer system to the detention basin determined by contributing area. The City of Lino Lakes shall pay Anoka County for a portion of the costs of the areas in the properties acquired by Anoka County specifically for ponding for the project, the costs will be determined based on contributing flows at the following percentages for the Centerville Pond Property. Contributing Flow Percentage: Anoka County 40%, Lino Lakes 7%, Ramsey County 53% Anoka County: $126,829.18 Lino Lakes: $22,195.11 Ramsey County: $168,048.66 SIDEWALK: The parties agree that the construction of the sidewalk along the west side of Centerville Road (CSAH 21) and within the Roundabout in the Anoka County side of the intersection is eligible for federal funds and that the City will be responsible for the local match in areas where no sidewalk exists, and the County will be responsible for the local match where a sidewalk currently exists. This sidewalk location has been agreed to by the city. The parties understand that the cost for the sidewalk includes concrete surfacing, aggregate base, excavation (including muck excavation), borrow material (granular and topsoil), and turf establishment. TRAFFIC CONTROL: The parties understand and agree that portions of CSAH 21 will be closed to thru traffic during construction. The parties agree and understand the cost share for traffic control for the city shall be a prorated share based on the city project cost divided by the total project cost. III. COSTS The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work, shall constitute the "actual construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. 'Estimated construction costs" are good faith projections of the costs, which will be incurred for this project. Actual costs will vary and those will be the costs for which the relevant parties will be responsible. The estimated construction cost of the total project is $23,761,410.60. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 Federal funds available for the Project are capped at $19,000,000.00. The federal funds shall be split based on the ratio of eligible cost incurred by each party to the total eligible project cost. Eligible costs are the costs of items that can participate in federal funding as shown on Exhibit B. Any overruns in quantities beyond the federal funds will be charged to the local entities who are contributing to that portion of the project. After federal funding percentage is applied, the cost to the city for their share of the construction items of the Project is $274,365.27 The City participation in construction engineering will be at a rate of eight percent (8%) of their designated construction share of $274,365.27. The estimated cost to the City for construction engineering is $21,949,22. The total construction cost to the city after federal funds have been applied including construction engineering is $296,314.49 In summary, the total Lino Lakes Cost share of this project is $318,509.60 (Includes construction and Lino Lakes contribution for ponding properties in Anoka County) Upon award of the contract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, ninety five percent (95%) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $302,584.12 Prior to billing, this estimate will be updated by the County to reflect the actual bid prices as awarded. An updated cost estimate shall be provided to the City at the time of billing. The City's share of the cost of the project shall include only construction and construction engineering expense and does not include engineering design and administrative expenses incurred by the County. After final completion of the project, the City's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. If necessary, adjustments to the initial ninety five percent (95%) charged will be made in the form of credit or additional charges to the City's share. Also, the remaining five percent (5%) of the City's portion of the construction costs shall be paid at that time. The County agrees to submit to the city for review final quantities and cost within one year of project substantial completion. IV. TERM / TERMINATION This Agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution and will remain in effect until the Project and all restoration activities are completed, with exception of the ownership and maintenance provisions within this Agreement which shall continue indefinitely. V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County in conformance to the State laws. El Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and shall be made upon request by either party. Prior to city payment to the County, Anoka County shall provide the City a copy of all cost participation documents submitted to MnDOT State Aid to assist the city in their application for MSA funding. IX. MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance of the completed watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer (except catch basins and catch basin leads), and detention basins (including ponds and their outlet structures and grit chambers/collectors) shall be the sole obligation of the City. a. The City shall maintain the components of the storm sewer system. b. The cost for maintenance of trunk line outfalls and BMPs shall be distributed as follows: Centerville Wet Pond, City of Lino Lakes 47 %, Ramsey County 53 %, MnDOT 0%. c. The City of Lino Lakes shall notify Anoka County and Ramsey County of upcoming maintenance one year in advance to allow for proper notice and budgeting to Ramsey County. d. Within 30 days of completion of the maintenance, submit invoices to Ramsey County setting forth the share of the maintenance expense. Which invoice shall be paid within 30 days of submission. B. Maintenance of the bituminous trail on the west side of CSAH 21 shall be the responsibility of the City. The City shall be responsible for general routine maintenance, such as sweeping, clearing, plowing, trash removal and other incidental items. C. Maintenance of crosswalk pavement markings shall be the responsibility of the City and the County. The County will be responsible for the maintenance of the crosswalk pavement marking for the crossings at the Roundabout intersections. The City will be responsible for all crosswalk pavement markings for any trail/sidewalk crossings at all city streets. D. Maintenance of streetlights, including Roundabout lights and cost of electrical power to the streetlights shall be the sole obligation of the City. The City will be responsible for long-term maintenance and replacement of the complete street light system including items such as: poles, fixtures, luminaires, and control cabinets. E. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance and up -keep of the center islands located within the roundabout(s). X. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices herein, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, on behalf of the County, and to the City Administrator of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, on behalf of the City. Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 XI. INDEMNIFICATION The City and County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. XIII. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 0 Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNTY OF ANOKA Jim Dickinson County Administrator RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Joseph J. MacPherson, P.E. Transportation Division Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: Christine V. Carney Assistant County Attorney CITY OF LINO LAKES By: Rob Rafferty Mayor Dated: By: David Pecchia Interim City Administrator Dated: Lo First Name Last Name City Attorney Dated: 7 Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 EXHIBIT "A" Project Title Sheet Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 EXHIBIT "B" Cost Distribution Spreadsheet Anoka County Contract No. C00011514 EXHIBIT "C" FOR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED IN ANOKA COUNTY ITEMS COUNTY SHARE Concrete Curb & Gutter 50% Concrete Curb & Gutter for Median and Center Island Construction 100% Concrete Median Concrete Sidewalk Concrete Sidewalk Replacement Bikeways Bikeway Replacement Construction or Adjustment of Local Utilities Grading, Base and Bituminous Storm Sewer Driveway Upgrades Traffic Signals, new (communities larger than 5,000) w/ State Aid approved SJR Traffic Signals, replacement (communities larger than 5,000) w/ State Aid approved SJR 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%, Unless existing trail not placed at edge of R/W 0% 100% 100% 0% based on state aid letter*2 100%, of up -grades the cost of its legs of the intersection plus''% the cost of the County legs of the intersection Traffic Signals, new & replacements (communities less than 5,000) w/ State Aid approved SJR Traffic Signal, w/o State Aid approved SJR CITY SHARE based on state aid letter*2 100%, in -kind '/2 the cost of its legs of the intersection the cost of its legs of the intersection 100% 0% 50% 0% 0*1 100% 0% 100% 0% the cost of its legs of the intersection 0% 100% EVP 0% 100% Engineering Services *3 *3 Right -of -Way 100%*4 0% Street Lights 0% 100% Noise Walls 100%, if not previously notifiedx5 100%, if previously notified*5 *1 The County pays for 100% of Standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a local unit of government requests decorative median such as brick, stamped concrete, or landscaping, the local unit will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard median. *2 In the event no State Aid is being used, or in the event the state aid letter does not determine cost split percentages, drainage cost shares will be computed by the proportion of contributing flow outside the County right of way to the total contributing flow. *3 Engineering shall be paid by the Lead Agency except that any participating agency will pay construction engineering in the amount of 8% of the construction costs paid by that agency. *4 In the event that the Township or City requests purchase of right-of-way in excess of those right-of-ways required by County construction, the Township or City participates to the extent an agreement can be reached in these properties. For instance, a Township or City may request a sidewalk be constructed alongside a County roadway which would require additional right-of-way, in which case the Township or City may pay for that portion of the right-of-way. Acquisition of right-of-way for new alignments shall be the responsibility of the Township or City in which the alignment is located. This provision may be waived by agreement with the County Board if the roadway replaces an existing alignment and the local unit of government takes jurisdiction of that existing alignment. In addition, any costs, including right-of-way costs, incurred by the County because a Township or City did not acquire sufficient right-of-way during the platting process or redevelopment process as requested by the County shall be paid by the Township or City. *5 Notification includes any letter to the agency indicating that noise will potentially be an issue in the future, likely received during the Plat Review Process. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of the agency paying for the initial installation. When the County is the responsible agency, it shall pay 100% of Standard Noise Wall Cost. If a local agency requests decorative noise walls, the requesting agency will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard noise wall. 10 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 9 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director WORK SESSION DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Special Assessment Senior Citizen Deferral BACKGROUND Minnesota Statutes Chapter 435.193 allows cities to provide a hardship assessment deferral provided standards are adopted establishing guidelines for determining the existence of hardship. City Code section 303.10 allows for the City Council to defer payment of special assessments on homestead property owned by a person that is 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of permanent and total disability. The deferment is subject to certain income - related conditions. To be eligible a property owner must meet the following income -related requirements: 1) The owner's shall not have an annual gross income in excess of Section 8, low-income limits in effect at the time of the application. This number is set annually for the metro area. 2) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have gross assets (excluding the homestead property) in excess of $50,000. 3) The Assessor's Market Value of the applicant's homestead parcel shall not exceed $60,000. Items 2 & 3 above have not been adjusted since 1983. The code allows for the Council, on the recommendation of the City Administrator, to adjust the asset and market value requirements by motion. However, staff are proposing deletion of the gross assets and market value requirements. This would leave the low-income limits that are regionally established each year ($78,250 for a two -person household). Alternatively, some cities use a formula determination based on the annual assessment amount as a percentage of annual gross income. For example, the hardship determination could be established when the annual assessment rate exceeds 2% of total adjusted gross incomes. This would allow for a more flexible policy based on assessment amounts. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION Staff is requesting Council direction to prepare an amendment to City Code Section 303.10 for consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Code section 303.10 § 303.10 DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. (1) The Council may defer the payment of any special assessments on homestead property owned by a person who is 65 years of age or older, or who is retired by virtue of permanent and total disability, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record the deferment of special assessments where the following conditions are met; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the determination of such a hardship on the basis of exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by these standards and guidelines where the determination made by the City Council in a nondiscriminatory manner will give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants: (a) Any applicant must be 65 years of age or older, or retired by virtue of permanent and total disability, and must own a legal or equitable interest in the property applied for which must be the homestead of the applicant. (b) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have an annual gross income in excess of the Section 8, low income limits in effect at the time of the application (as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development). Income specified in the application should be the income of the year preceding the year in which the application is made, or the average income of the three years prior to the year in which the application is made. (c) The applicant and any other owner of the property who resides therein with the applicant shall not have gross assets (excluding the homestead property) in excess of $50,000. (d) The Assessor's Market Value of the applicant's homestead parcel shall not exceed $60,000. (e) The limitations on an applicant's assets and property market value may be adjusted on an annual basis upon recommendation of the City Administrator and motion of the City Council. (f) Unless otherwise provided under the resolution adopting the assessment, all such deferred assessments shall bear interest at the rate of two percent above the city's borrowing rate. (g) This procedure shall not apply to any assessment of $100 or less. (2) The deferment shall be granted for as long a period of time as the hardship exists and the conditions as aforementioned have been met. However, it shall be the duty of the applicant to notify the City Clerk of any change in his status that would affect eligibility for deferment. (3) The entire amount of deferred special assessments shall be due within 60 days after the loss of eligibility by the applicant. If the special assessment is not paid within 60 days, the City Clerk shall add thereto interest at two percent above the city's borrowing rate from date assessments were adopted through December 31 of the following year and the total amount of principal and interest shall be certified to the County Auditor for collection with taxes the following year. Should the applicant plead and prove, to the satisfaction of the Council, that full repayment of the deferred special assessment would cause the applicant particular undue hardship, the Council may order that the applicant pay within 60 days a sum equal to the number of installments of deferred special assessments outstanding and unpaid to date (including principal and interest) with the balance thereafter paid according to the terms and condition of the original special assessment. (4) The option to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest shall become due upon the occurrence of any one of the following: (a) The death of the owner when there is no spouse who is eligible for deferment. (b) The sale, transfer or subdivision of all or any part of the property. (c) Loss of homestead status on the property. (d) Determination by the Council for any reason that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. (5) Notice of the special assessment deferral shall be filed by the City Clerk with the Anoka County Recorder as provided by law. Failure to record such notice, however, shall not affect the validity of the special assessments. (6) Any person, firm, entity or corporation who shall provide false information in application for a deferral under this provision or shall violate any term or condition contained herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor as defined by state law. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Item 10 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Roberta Colotti, CIVIC, City Clerk MEETING DATE: May 5, 2025 TOPIC: Liquor License Fees INTRODUCTION Business license renewal time is approaching, and the City has received a request from a local restaurant to split the payment of the annual license fee. The City Attorney has advised that the City Council can provide consensus direction regarding the timing of the payment and as long as the payment amount is not amended the fee chart does not need to be revised. BACKGROUND Liquor licenses run from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. The On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License fee is $4,500 per year and the Sunday Sales license fee is $200 per year. It is requested that applicants for On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales licenses be allowed to make payment at the time of application of half of the amount due with final payment of the remaining balance by or before December 31, 2025. The original invoice will be sent with the total amount due, and the split payment will be made available upon request. This option has been reviewed by the City Finance Department and is acceptable. This option is being requested to support our local businesses. RECOMMENDATIONS Consensus direction to approve a split payment for On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales licenses with half payment due at the time of application and half payment due by or before December 31, 2025, upon request of the applicant. ATTACHMENTS None