HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250528 EB Combined PacketMeeting guidelines on reverse side.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
Broadcast on Cable TV Channel 16
and northmetrotv.com/lino-lakes-stream
ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 6:30 P.M.
Council Chambers (televised)
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Public Comment (sign-in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum)
4. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
5. Approval of Minutes: April 30, 2025
6. Action Items
A. Northwest Main AUAR Draft Update and Public Comment
B. Erickson Property Preliminary Plat
7. Discussion Items
A. Recycling Updates
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ADVISORY BOARD MEETING GUIDELINES
Advisory boards are fact-finding bodies established to aid the City Council in specific areas. The
decisions of any board are considered advisory only and all final decisions rest with the City Council.
Board meetings shall operate in accordance with the procedures established by the City Council.
The following meeting guidelines are derived from the City Council Rules of Decorum.
Members of the Audience – No person in the audience shall engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct such as audible commentary during a meeting, hand clapping, stamping of feet, whistling,
using profane language, yelling and similar demonstrations, which conduct disturbs the peace and
good order of the meeting.
Public Comment– Comments from the public will be accepted on any matter, whether on the
agenda or not. Comments will not be accepted during specific agenda items unless a Public Hearing
has been noticed. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the following
guidelines:
• Sign-in prior to the start of the meeting
• Step up to the microphone when recognized by the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair)
• State your name and address for the record
• State the subject to be discussed
• Limit comments to 4 minutes
• Address comments to the board as a whole, not any specific member
• No question may be asked of a board member or staff member without the permission of
the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair)
• Elect a spokesperson for a group of persons who wish to address the board on the same
subject
Public Hearing – A public hearing is a separate item of business on the agenda. It gives the public
an opportunity to comment on the topic identified. Please remember to be courteous and
respectful and abide by the guidelines outlined for public comment (although no sign-in required).
Typically, a public hearing proceeds as follows:
1. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the agenda item and staff will
present their report.
2. Board members have the opportunity to ask staff questions about the item.
3. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) opens the public hearing and will recognize those
who want to speak.
4. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall close the public hearing.
5. The Board will then discuss the item. No further public comments are allowed.
6. The Board will make a recommendation and/or decision.
After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall
address the board from the audience on the matter under consideration. The Presiding Officer
(Chair or Vice-Chair) shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings.
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 1
DRAFT MINUTES
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Schwartz called the Environmental meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on April 30,
2025.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC COMMENT (sign in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum)
Chair Schwartz opened public comment at 6:30 p.m.
Mary Kay Sell, 564 Lonesome Pine Trail, spoke about the pond treatment. Ms. Sell and
her neighbors plan to pay for the treatment themselves. Ms. Sell has worked with Lakes
Management, Inc. and city staff to try to come to an agreement on treatment.
Chair Schwartz closed public comment at 6:33 p.m.
4. SETTING THE AGENDA: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items
Chair Schwartz approved the agenda as provided.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 24, 2024
Ms. Buchmeier made a motion to approve the March 26, 2025 minutes. Ms. Stevenson
seconded. Motion carried 6 – 0.
DATE: April 30, 2025
TIME STARTED: 6:30 p.m.
TIME ENDED: 8:53 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Alex Schwartz, Julia Nelson, Elizabeth Larkin,
Mary Jo Stevenson, Lindsay Buchmeier,
Jonathan Parsons
MEMBERS ABSENT: Shawn Holmes
STAFF PRESENT: Tom Hoffman, Marissa Ertel
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 2
DRAFT MINUTES
6. ACTION ITEMS
A. Birchwood Acres Pond Treatment Proposal
City staff has received feedback from concerned residents regarding the aesthetic
quality of storm pond RLA-010-B located in Birchwood Acres Park. This pond treats
stormwater runoff from nearly 70 properties located primarily on Hawthorn Road and
Lonesome Pine Trail in the Park Grove development.
The main concerns include the vegetation that covers the surface of the pond and odor.
The vegetation present on this pond is primarily duckweed, which provides water
purification by incorporating nutrients. It is also an important food source for wildlife.
The odor is primarily due to decomposition of plants and algae.
Residents have expressed interest in treating this pond, citing the aesthetic quality of
two ponds on private land nearby that receive treatments with algaecide and herbicide.
These are storm pond RLA-013-A, located south of the Red Hawk Trail cul-de-sac, and an
unnamed pond located directly north of Birchwood Acres Park ballfield.
Residents have petitioned 100% of the adjacent private property of the pond and
agreed to share in the cost of treatments privately. There would be no cost to the city
for the residents to privately treat the pond.
Ms. Nelson had questions about whether this would be an acceptable treatment with
Mr. Hoffman’s professional experience. Mr. Hoffman stated that this treatment has
worked previously, but Lake Management has stated that no other city owned pond has
been treated by them before.
Ms. Nelson had questions about the legality of the pond treatment and whether the City
would be held liable for any issues. Mr. Hoffman stated that the City attorney would
draft a document regarding this treatment and would have to be approved through the
City Council.
Ms. Larkin asked what would happen if treatment needed to stop and what the impact
to the pond would be. Mr. Hoffman stated that there would be no negative impact to
the pond.
Mr. Schwartz asked how this would impact our MS4 permit, and how often we would be
monitoring the water quality. Mr. Hoffman stated that the City would be liable, the City
attorney would have to review the contract.
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 3
DRAFT MINUTES
Ms. Buchmeier asked whether there was a City Code regarding the treatment of the
pond. Mr. Hoffman stated there is under the storm water pond section.
Mr. Parsons asked whether there might be issues in the future with chemicals in the
soil. Mr. Hoffman stated that there would have to be testing and there could be
potential impacts to the soil. Mr. Hoffman stated that the size of the treatment would
not have much of an impact on the sediment. Mr. Hoffman stated that the compound
that is used is meant to make the soil heavier to not go down stream.
Mr. Schwartz stated that he liked the idea of revisiting this topic after two years to make
sure there haven’t been environmental impacts. Mr. Schwartz also would like to make
sure that the insurance for Lakes Management would cover any fines.
Ms. Buchmeier had concerns about whether this would then allow all ponds in Lino
Lakes to be treated. Ms. Buchmeier was concerned that we do not know how this would
affect the environment in the long term for multiple ponds. Mr. Hoffman stated that
this circumstance would most likely not be something that comes up often with the
costs.
Mr. Schwartz asked whether this would be the start of the pilot project. Mr. Hoffman
stated this discussion is just for the pond in Birchwood Acres, and that a pilot project
would be presented at a later date.
Ms. Larkin stated that this should come back in two years to check in and see the
impacts of treatment. Mr. Schwartz would like there to be water testing before and
after the first treatment but is unsure of how long between testing’s would be the most
beneficial. Mr. Hoffman stated that water testing can be costly, and the pond would
need testing prior to treatment to get a baseline to better understand what is
happening to the water with the treatment through Lakes Management.
Ms. Buchmeier had concerns about the precedent this would be setting for the City. Ms.
Buchmeier worried that this is being rushed and would not recommend that this go
forward.
Mr. Schwartz considered tabling this topic and instead moving forward with a pilot
program and bring this topic back once a pilot program has been fully discussed.
Mr. Schwartz made a motion to table this discussion for a further date and discuss this
item again once a pilot program has been put in place. Ms. Nelson seconded. Motion
carried 5 – 1.
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 4
DRAFT MINUTES
B. Nelson Rehbein Properties PUD Concept Plan
Nelson Rehbein Properties is a proposed residential subdivision on approximately 24.55
acres located north of Nadeau Acres development, west by existing farm fields, north by
existing industrial buildings, and easterly along 20th Avenue S.
The site is comprised of three (3) land parcels, one (1) single family home on the
southern portion (Nelson’s parcel), a wooded swale that runs through the middle of the
site that is shown as wetlands within the exhibits, along with the rest of the site as
agricultural fields.
Ms. Larkin would like a better understanding of how this development would reuse
stormwater for irrigation. Mr. Hoffman stated this would depend on the site itself, such
as soil types. Ms. Larkin wanted to verify that having the ponds in the development
would be part of the best practices. Mr. Hoffman stated that it is a good first step that
the developer is showing ponds.
Mr. Schwartz would like to know whether the ponds would be city owned or owned
privately. Mr. Hoffman stated that the ponds shown would be city owned. The ponds
located closer to the townhomes would potentially be private depending on where the
water flows.
Ms. Larkin would like to know with the townhomes would they be under an association
and if they were, would they be held to a standard to make sure they are maintaining
the landscaping. Mr. Hoffman stated that the developer would be responsible for
meeting landscaping requirements and there are city codes that would be able to be
enforced if weeds started to become overgrown.
Ms. Buchmeier made a motion to approve the recommendations by staff. Mr. Parsons
seconded. Motion carried 6 – 0.
C. Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat
The applicant, Capital Real Estate, Inc., submitted a land use application for Clearwater
Commons preliminary plat and vacation. The preliminary plat is for three (3)
commercial lots north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of I-35E, east of 21st Avenue
North and south of the park and ride.
The owner, ALino, LLC, is proposing a 3-lot commercial development located on the NW
corner of I-35 and Main Street. The 14-acre site is one existing lot legally described as
Outlot A, Alino Addition. Per the December 19, 2024 Preliminary Report of Geotechnical
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 5
DRAFT MINUTES
Exploration prepared by American Engineering Testing, the site is an existing agricultural
2 property with fairly flat terrain towards the center and higher banks on the northwest
and southeast corners. Elevations at the soil borings ranged from 911 feet to 904 feet.
Wetlands exist on site.
Mr. Parsons had questions about where the proposed road would be located on site
regarding the wetlands. Mr. Hoffman showed the board where the road would be
located and explained it would be right-in. Ms. Larkin asked what the impact would be
to the existing wetlands. Mr. Hoffman stated we are waiting on their wetland mitigation
reports.
Ms. Larkin would like to see more green space on the site. Mr. Hoffman stated they will
have to meet the city landscaping requirements, and since this is a preliminary plat the
developer has not submitted their landscaping plans. Ms. Larkin had questions about
the screening on site and making sure there is more greenery. Mr. Hoffman stated that
the screening would be landscaped with plants.
Ms. Nelson made a motion to approve/reject the recommendations by staff. Ms.
Buchmeier seconded. Motion carried 6 – 0.
D. Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat
Java Lino Lakes 2.0 was brought to the Environmental Board on October 30, 2024 for
Preliminary Plat. The applicant is now proposing to split the two lots on the north side
of the road into three commercial lots. The lot on the south side of the road is to
remain the same per the original plans.
The 5-acre site includes the redevelopment of six (6) existing lots along the west side of
Lake Drive. The lots south of 77th Street are commercially zoned lots that either had or
currently have single family dwellings. The developer will be removing the existing
dwellings as part of the project. Tree removal within the proposed road right-of-way
and utility easements was completed by the City in spring of 2024.
Ms. Nelson asked whether there were wetland impacts to this portion of the site. Mr.
Hoffman stated there are no impacts to this portion.
Ms. Larkin had concerns about the blandings turtle and whether there would be enough
space for the turtles to move freely. Mr. Hoffman stated that they are meeting
requirements to allow for free movement of the blandings turtles.
Environmental Board
April 30, 2025
Page 6
DRAFT MINUTES
Ms. Buchmeier made a motion to approve the recommendations by staff and board
recommendation of finding a new site for a community garden. Mr. Parsons seconded.
Motion carried 6 – 0.
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Recycling Updates
Mr. Hoffman provided recycling updates.
B. Earth Day Update
8. ADJOURN
Ms. Nelson made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:53 p.m.
Motion was seconded by Ms. Buchmeier. Motion carried 6 – 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Marissa Ertel – Community Development Administrative Assistant
1
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
MEETING DATE: May 28, 2025
TOPIC: Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), Mapping NW Main
Draft Comment
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
In September of 2024, the City Council approved a professional services contract with Kimley
Horn to prepare a master plan and complete an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR).
The study area includes 980 acres of the northwest portion of Lino Lakes. The process has
included multiple community outreach opportunities, involvement of study area stakeholders
and review by the City advisory boards and City Council.
Three development scenarios originally emerged, one being the existing 2040 Comprehensive
Plan. Each scenario maintained essentially the same residential unit count with a mix of land
use types but provided for different design alternatives. Through the design process scenarios
2 and 3 merged into Scenario 2.1, which establishes a gateway into the City at the border with
Blaine. Scenario 1 and Scenario 2.1 are proposed to be carried through the environmental
review process.
Resolution No. 25-51 authorized the preparation of the draft AUAR document. The
development scenarios will be analyzed for potential environmental impacts. A mitigation plan
will be created to address the environmental impacts.
Once it is prepared, the draft AUAR will be brought to the Environmental Board and City Council
for discussion and revisions. The City Council will authorize the distribution of the draft for
public comment. This will begin a 30-day public comment period.
The draft AUAR will be available for public comment and the document will be available for
download on Tuesday May 27th. The document will be available online at
https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/eqb-monitor as well as posted on the City website under public
notices. The document can be viewed be using the following link until the website goes live for
public comment Lino Lakes Main Street Draft AUAR
2
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
1. Scenario 1
2. Scenario 2.1
SCENARIO 1: “COMPREHENSIVE PLAN”
Land Use
NORTH OF MAIN STREET Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528
High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533
SOUTH OF MAIN STREET Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360
High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492
Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236
TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404
City Comprehensive Plan
Full Build Out
Scenario
Gateway Village
Scenario 2.1
PREFERRED SCENARIO 2.1: “GATEWAY VILLAGE”
Land Use
NORTH OF MAIN STREET Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528
High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533
SOUTH OF MAIN STREET Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360
High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492
Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236
TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404
City Comprehensive Plan
Full Build Out
Scenario
Gateway Village
Scenario 2.1Land Use
NORTH OF MAIN STREETGross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
SF of
Commercial
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528
High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533
SOUTH OF MAIN STREETGross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Gross
Acres
Approx
net acres
w/o
wetlands
and open
water
Approx #
of Units
Low
Approx #
of Units
High
Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327
Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360
High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352
Planned Resi / Com (R5)
Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112
Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492
Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9
Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236
TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404
City Comprehensive Plan
Full Build Out
Scenario
Gateway Village
Scenario 2.1
1
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
May 28, 2025
Erickson Property Preliminary Plat Plan
Hampton Companies
Karina J. Erickson
BACKGROUND
Hampton Companies has submitted an application for a Preliminary Plat to allow the
construction of 14 single-family homes at 7590 20th Avenue in Lino Lakes. The current
5.15-acre parcel contains an existing home and numerous outbuildings. The site is
surrounded by the Watermark PUD development by Lennar to the North, East and
South. Our plan is to extend the existing street grid planned for the Watermark
development and provide another housing option.
The site is comprised of one (1) land parcels, one (1) single family home on the
northwest portion (Erickson’s parcel), one (1) shed in the center, and one (1) wooded
barn on the southwest corner.
The land parcel is currently owned by the Erickson family.
Hampton Companies is currently proposing a 14- residential lot subdivision that:
1.Provides 14 single-family homes
This staff report is based on the following information:
•Civil Plan Set prepared by Landform dated May 12, 2025
•Haugo Geotechnical Services dated May 6, 2025
•Landform Stormwater Surface Water Management plan dated May 12, 2025
ANALYSIS
2
The 2040 Future Land Use Map displays this area as low density mixed residential that
allows for 3.0–4.0 units per acre. We are proposing R1 – Single Family Residential Lots for
the 60’ single-family to meet the allowed density requirement. Planning and zoning will
review density calculations to ensure appliance with R1 zoning requirements.
The Erickson Preliminary Plat Concept Plan displays a total of 14 residential lots that
consist of the following:
• 14 Single-Family
Rare, Unique, or Significant Resources
An initial habitat assessment has not been conducted, One may be completed if there is
alteration to significant resources.
Federal Rare Species Considerations
Review of the USFWS information for planning and Consultation (IpaC) website identified
the following species for review.
There are no critical habitats identified at this location.
Species Classification Disturbance
Monarch Butterfly Candidate No Effect
Salamander Mussel Endangered No Effect
Tricolored Bat Endangered Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Whooping Crane Experimental No Effect
A Blanding’s turtle avoidance plan will be submitted as part of the future replacement
plan application. Surmountable curb is being proposed throughout the development to
allow turtles access to the boulevards without trapping them in the curb line.
The developer will be required to make sure there are no impacts associated with the
project to federally protected species.
Stormwater Management
City Engineer to review stormwater management. The current plan shows one proposed
stormwater pond. Modeling and calculations will be required with future submittals. The
Soil report should be submitted to verify soil types and potential stormwater BMP
facilities.
Stormwater ponding is proposed on site with water reuse for irrigation. Water quality
treatment will be met through the stormwater reuse final calculations. Final calculations
will be required with future submittals.
3
Rate control is being met through the storm water basin for all storm events. Storm water
rates are going to be lower than existing conditions with the proposed conditions.
Flood Plain
The site does not fall within a flood management zone
Shoreland District
The site does not fall within the Shoreland District.
Wetlands
There are no known wetlands on site. Wetland delineation may be required if wetland
characteristics are found on site.
Greenway System, Parks and Trails
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan does not show this area as having a park or part of the
greenway system. Trails and pedestrian facilities will be looked into with the development
of making connections to existing neighborhoods adjacent to the site.
There is a neighborhood park located within the neighboring development that will be
utilized as a part of this development. The city will collect park dedication fees as a part
of the development. The existing trail along 20th avenue will be extended north as part of
the development.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Considerations
The site is within an I-35E corridor boundary. All future development will be required to
meet the AUAR mitigation measures. Staff will use the AUAR checklist to verify
compliance with future submittals.
Drinking Water Protection
The site is not within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The project
location is within the utility staging area 1B (2025-2030). The project will be served by
municipal sewer and water.
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards
The purpose of these standards is to protect valuable trees and stands of vegetation
while not interfering with landowners’ reasonable use and development of property.
4
The goal is to minimize unnecessary loss of habitat, biodiversity, and forest resources
and to replace removed trees in areas where tree cover is most critical.
A tree survey has been provided. Most of the trees on site are oak, pine, maple.
Majority of the trees were planted as windbreaks from the adjacent agricultural use.
The tree inventory will need to be updated to only include significant trees and trees
within the project location. The coniferous trees will need to be included by height.
The site falls primarily withing the basic use area. No mitigation is required within this
area. Twelve trees are being proposed for removal within the stormwater management
area. Storm water ponding is not included within the basic use area. Mitigation will be
required at a 1 to 1 ratio.
There are currently ninety (90) significant trees identified on site. Thirteen (13) are
proposed to be preserved as a part of the development.
The developer is proposing planting 14 boulevard trees, one for each proposed lot. An
additional 7 rear yard trees are being proposed within block 1. Staff recommends
adding additional rear yard trees within block 2 to provide additional plantings and
screening from the existing development.
Tree Preservation and Mitigation Standards will need to be met with future submittals.
Open Areas Landscape Standards
The developer will be required to meet open area landscape standards as part of the
proposed project. Open area standards are to provide one large tree and two large
shrubs per every 2500 square feet of open space. Final calculations for open area
plantings will be calculated with final plat submittal to confirm final open space.
Currently the proposal does not show open space landscaping.
Buffer and Screen Standards
There is no official requirements, but city staff are looking at providing additional
plantings in the rear yards for screenings from existing properties.
Double planted screening is being proposed with shrubs along the back of the property
lines for block one as screening from 20th Ave. Screening should be provided on the
property lines. Currently showing plantings within the outlot, this will likely cause
maintenance issues in the future.
Canopy Cover
5
Canopy cover requirements do not apply to single-family residential developments.
Foundation Landscaping
Foundation landscaping standards do not apply to single family residential development
Sod and Ground Cover Standards
All areas not otherwise improved in accordance with the approved site plans shall have
a minimum depth of 4 inches of topsoil and be sodded including boulevard areas. Seed
may be provided in lieu of sod in certain cases, including when the area is adjacent to
natural areas or wetlands.
Low maintenance turf should be evaluated throughout development. Ground covers
should be drought resistant to reduce the need for irrigation use.
Lighting
The purpose of the lighting requirements in the Zoning Code is to reduce light pollution,
promote energy conservation, and increase nighttime safety, utility, security, and
productivity. Lighting is reviewed by the City Planner.
Per Section 1007.043(6)(d), no light source shall exceed 1.0-foot candle onto right of
way or 0.4-foot candle onto adjacent property.
Recycling
Curbside solid waste and recycling will be required for new homes within the
development.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Erickson Property Preliminary Plat be forwarded to the
Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following comments:
1. Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer
a. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated
and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater
ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse.
b. Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings.
If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards
(MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA
6
2. EOF should be shown as stabilized rock to prevent erosion of the stormwater pond.
3. Low maintenance turf should be evaluated throughout development. Ground
covers should be drought resistant to reduce the need for irrigation use.
4. Provide a tree inventory for the site showing only significant deciduous trees of 6” in
dbh or larger. Coniferous trees are measured by height, coniferous trees over 12’ would
be considered significant.
a. Coniferous trees should be measured by height not DBH.
b. Remove off-site trees from the final tree inventory
c. Mitigation table provided for trees outside of basic use.
5. On section 4.1, bold or change the color of the tree tags to be visible.
6. Current plans show Twelve (12) trees being removed for storm water ponding.
Stormwater ponding is not included under the basic use area and therefore mitigation
will be required of those removals.
7. Sheet L7.1 shows coniferous tree planting detail. No coniferous trees are being shown
on the planting tables. Remove this detail if not in use.
8. On Block one lot one and block two lot seven, the trees are planted outside of the
boulevard. The city is okay but noted there will not be future planting there.
9. Trees that are to be preserved should show tree protection (snow fence or silt fence)
around the trees during construction.
10. Provide plantings in the rear of block two for screening from adjacent existing homes.
11. Provide calculations for open space requirements. 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs are
required for every 2,500sf of open space.
12. Shrubs located in the rear lots of block 1 should be planted within the property
boundaries for screening. Open space requirements will require the planting of shrubs
within the outlot as well.
13. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final plans.
Please provide more site-specific mixes for each location
14. Add inlet protection to catch basins on corner of Osakis and Norway lane
15. Add inlet protection to storm manholes adjacent to project site.
7
16. Provide redundant perimeter control along east boundary of project site adjacent to
existing storm sewer.
17. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an
NPDES permit. Proof of permit should be required before construction.
a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the
MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26
b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future
submittals
18. The project site falls within the I-35E AUAR study area. The proposed development will
be required to meet all requirements of the AUAR including mitigation measures.
19. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to migrating
or nesting bat populations
20. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb is provided to allow
turtles access off of the roads.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Location
2. Erickson Preliminary Plan
3. Project Narrative
4. Geotechnical Report
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C0.1CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEETC001HAC003.DWGLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAERICKSON PROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTANORTHNO SCALEAREA LOCATION MAPSHEETS ISSUED BY DATECOMPOST/BIO LOGDAngle&And@At100 YR.100 Year Flood ElevationA.B.Anchor BoltA.D.Area DrainA/CAir Conditioning UnitADD.AddendumADDL.AdditionalADJ.Adjacent / AdjustAHUAir Handling UnitALT.AlternateALUM.AluminumANOD.AnodizedAPPROX.ApproximateARCHArchitect / ArchitecturalAUTO.AutomaticAVG.AverageB.C.Back of CurbB/WBottom of WallBFEBasement Floor ElevationBITBituminous (Asphaltic)BLDGBuildingBMBenchmarkBSMT.BasementC.F.Cubic FeetC.F.S.Cubic Feet Per SecondC.G.Corner GuardC.J.Control JointC.L.CenterlineC.M.U.Concrete Masonry UnitC.O.CleanoutC.O.E.U.S. Army Corps Of EngineersC.Y.Cubic YardsCBCatch BasinCBMHCatch Basin ManholeCEM.CementCIPCast Iron PipeCMPCorrugated Metal PipeCONC.Concrete (Portland)CONN.ConnectionCONST.ConstructionCONT.ContinuousCONTR.ContractorCOP.CopperCU.CubicD.S.Down SpoutDEG.DegreeDEMO.Demolition / DemolishDEPT.DepartmentDET.DetailDIA.DiameterDIAG.DiagonalDIM.DimensionDIPDuctile Iron PipeDNDownDWG.DrawingE.EastE.J.Expansion JointE.O.Emergency OverflowE.O.S.Emergency Overflow SwaleE.W.Each WayEA.Each EL.ElevationELEC.ElectricalELEV.ElevationEMER.EmergencyENGR.EngineerENTR.EntranceEQ.EqualEQUIP.EquipmentEQUIV.EquivalentEXIST.ExistingEXP.ExpansionF & IFurnish and InstallF.B.O.Furnished by OthersF.C.Face of CurbF.D.Floor DrainF.D.C.Fire Department ConnectionF.V.Field VerifyFBFull BasementFBWOFull Basement Walk OutFBLOFull Basement Look OutFDN.FoundationFESFlared End SectionFFEFinished Floor ElevationFLR.FloorFT. OR (')FootFUT.FutureG.B.Grade BreakG.C.General ContractorGAL.GallonGALV.GalvanizedGFEGarage Floor ElevationGL.GlassGR.GradeH.HeightH.P.High PointHDPEPHigh Density Polyethylene PipeHGT.HeightHORIZ.HorizontalHVACHeating, Ventilation, Air ConditioningHYDHydrantI.D.Inside Dimension OR IdentificationI.E. or IEInvert ElevationIN. OR (")InchesINFO.InformationINL.Inlet ElevationINSUL.InsulationINV.Invert ElevationJT.JointL.F.Linear FeetL.P.Low Point / Liquid PetroleumLB.PoundLGULocal Government UnitLB.PoundLB.LongitudinalLT.Light / LightingMAINT.MaintenanceMAS.MasonryMATL.MaterialMAX.MaximumMECHMechanicalMED.MediumMFR.ManufacturerMHManholeMIN.Minimum / MinuteMISC.MiscellaneousMNDOTMinnesota Department Of TransportationMOD.Module / ModularMUL.MullionN.NorthN.I.C.Not In ContractNO. OR #NumberNOMNominalNTSNot to ScaleNWENormal Water ElevationNWLNormal Water LevelO.F.On CenterO.G.Outside DimensionO.H.Overhead ElectricOH.OverheadOHWLOrdinary High Water LevelOPNG.OpeningORIG.OriginalP.C.Point of CurvatureP.I.Point of IntersectionPIVPost Indicator ValveP.L. OR P/LProperty LineP.O.B.Point of BeginningP.S.F.Pounds Per Square FootP.S.I.Pounds Per Square InchP.T.Point of TangencyP.V.C.Point of Vertical CurvatureP.V.I.Point of Vertical IntersectionP.V.T.Point of Vertical TangencyPEPolyethylenePED.Pedestal / PedestrianPERF.PerforatedPREP.PreparationPROJ.ProjectPROP.ProposedPVCPoly-Vinyl-Chloride (Piping)PVMT.PavementQTR.QuarterQTY.QuantityRRadiusRAD.RadiusRERim Elevation (Casting)R.D.Roof DrainR.E.Remove ExistingR.O.Rough OpeningR.P.Radius PointRCReinforced Concrete PipeR.S.Rough SlabRSDRoof Storm DrainRE.RegardingREINF.ReinforcedREQ'DRequiredREV.Revision / RevisedRGURegulatory Government UnitROW OR R/WRight of WayS.SouthS.F.Square FeetSAN.Sanitary SewerSECT.SectionSESplit Entry /Side ExitSEWOSplit Entry Walk Out /Side Exit Walk OutSHT.SheetSIM.SimilarSLNT.SealantSPEC.SpecificationSQ.SquareSSDSubsurface drainSTMHStorm Sewer ManholeSTD.StandardSTRUCT.StructuralSYM.SymmetricalTThicknessT/RTop of RimT/WTop of WallTEMP.TemporaryTHK.Thick / ThicknessT.J.Tooled JointTNHTop Nut HydrantTYP.TypicalU.N.O.Unless Noted OtherwiseV.B.Vapor BarrierV.C.Vertical CurveV.I.F.Verify In FieldVER.VerifyVER.VerticalVEST.VestibuleWWidthW.PT.Working PointW.W.F.Welded Wire FabricW/WithW/OWithoutWOWalk OutVER.WetlandWPWaterproofWETL.WeightYD.YardYR.YearEROSION CONTROL BLANKETABBREVIATIONSSILT FENCESYMBOLDESCRIPTIONREVISED AREA (THIS ISSUE)REVISION - ADDENDUM, BULLETIN, ETC.NOTE REFERENCELARGE SHEET DETAILCOORDINATE POINTPARKING STALL COUNTDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLEROSION CONTROL SYMBOLSDRAWING SYMBOLSLEGAL DESCRIPTIONBENCHMARKINLET PROTECTIONC21C7.31122Project Benchmark:MNDOT GSID Station #92391Station Name: 0282 LLocation: In Lino Lakes, 1.4 miles North along interstate highway 35E from the junction of interstate highway 35E and County 14, atinterstate highway 35E milepoint 124.80, 93.1 feet west of southbound interstate highway 35E, 7.0 feet east of a fence line, 1.3 feet eastof a witness post.Elevation = 909.47 (NAVD 88)Site Benchmark:Type: SpikeLocation = Spike in East face of pole, located on West side of property.Elevation = 904.23 (NAVD 88)The North 660 feet of the West 440 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 31, Range 22,except the North 150 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.3HAMPTON COMPANIES1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL 651-295-2459EMAIL DAN@HAMPTONCOS.COMCONTACT: DAN BROWNDESCRIPTIONSHEET NO.CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEETEXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLANNEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PLANPRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLANGRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING& EROSION CONTROL PLANSANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN& STORM SEWER PLANSTREET PROFILE PLANCIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSCIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSCIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSCIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSCIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSTREE PRESERVATION & MITIGATION PLANLANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANLANDSCAPE DETAILSCIVIL / LANDSCAPE SHEET INDEX & REVISION MATRIXOWNERC0.1C1.1C1.2C2.1C3.1C4.1C6.1C7.1C7.2C7.3C7.4C7.5L1.1L2.1L7.1LANDFORM105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401TEL 612-252-9070CONTACT: ERIC LUTHPROJECT CONTACTSCIVIL ENGINEERLANDFORM105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401TEL 612-252-9070CONTACT: JERROD G. LESAVAGESURVEYORLANDFORM105 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 513MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401TEL 612-252-9070CONTACT: JOHN ORTIZLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT05.12.25XXXXXXXXXXXUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICFOMODULAR RETAINING WALLFIELDSTONE RETAINING WALLNEWCATVUNDERGROUND CABLE/TVEXISTING DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONSTORM SEWER WATERMAINFORCE MAIN SANITARY SEWER-WASTEROOF DRAIN SYSTEMGAS LINE-UNDERGROUNDFIRE LINE (IF SEPARATE) FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONSOIL SUBDRAINTELEPHONE-UNDERGROUNDELECTRIC-UNDERGROUNDLAWN SPRINKLER SLEEVEBLDG.GASTELEELECLSSC.O.MAJOR CONTOURBUILDINGSPOT ELEVATION120CONCRETE SLOPE DIRECTIONCONCRETE CURBGUARD RAILFENCINGCONCRETE RETAINING WALLHEIGHT, TYPEPOWER POLELIGHT STANDARDEXIT LOCATIONUNDERGROUND STRUCTUREEDGE OF PAVEMENTBOLLARDCANOPY / OVERHANGBIT. EDGECATCH BASINMANHOLESYMBOLSLANDSCAPINGGRAVELFLAG POLE>>>POWERPOLEGUARD POSTGAS METERTREESTRAFFIC SIGNWATER MAINSANITARY SEWER LINESTORM SEWER LINEOVERHEAD ELECTRICMAJOR CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONCONCRETE BUILDINGCANOPY / OVERHANG12012"STS8"SANFENCINGCONCRETE CURBRETAINING WALL OESTORM MANHOLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTFLARED END SECTIONCATCH BASIN6"WTRXXHEIGHT, TYPE1NOTE NUMBERGUY WIREIRON MONUMENT FOUNDWATER SHUT-OFF VALVEllMEASURED DISTANCEDISTANCE PER RECORDED PLATUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUTUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUEGAS LINEGPAVING BLOCKPAVING BLOCKSET 1/2" X 14" IRON PIPETRANSFORMERTREE LINEMAILBOXSURVEY DISK (BENCHMARK)WSOBITUMINOUSSOIL BORING123.45%1.00234.5LIGHT POLEMINOR CONTOUR123MINOR CONTOUR123GMSTSSSANITARY MANHOLETNHMBB#PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025RELEVANT SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDER OF PRECEDENCEIf there is a conflict between or among any of the terms or provisions of the Contract Documents, the Contract Documents shall be generallyconstrued as being complementary with one another with the intent of providing the highest quality to the CLIENT. However, if a conflict cannot bereconciled the ENGINEER shall be consulted and their written directions shall be followed. In general, unless otherwise directed in writing by theENGINEER the following order of precedence shall apply from highest precedence (“1”) to lowest (“7”).1.Agreement between OWNER and CONTRACTOR2.City Standard Specifications and Detail Plates3.MnDOT Specifications for Construction4.City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Specifications5.Conditions of the Contract6.Plans7.Digital Model8.Bid ProposalIRIPRAPGATE VALVEHYDFES>>>>>>>>>>>>IFMRDFIRE35W35E61165th Street N.Main St.Main St.Frenchman Rd.20th Ave. N.24th Ave. N.73rd St.21st Ave. N.Peltier Lake Dr.77th St. E.Rehbein St.Rainy Ln.Norway Ln.WatermarkWay170th Street N.80th Street E.Peltier LakeCenterville Lake George Watch LakeSITE20th Ave. N.OtterLake Rd.XXXX
STSTST660.00150.00440.00SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 660 FEETSOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 150 FEETNORTH LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22WEST LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22
EAST LINE OF THE
WEST 440 FEETDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WATERMARK 5TH ADDITIONDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 5TH ADDITION DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 6TH ADDITION 6060 PID: 12-31-22-33-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0032MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0059MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0060MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0061MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0062MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0063MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0034MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0035MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0038MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0039MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0040US HOME LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0050WATERMARK MASTER HOAPID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)PID: 13-31-22-22-0002KOMINSKI LUTHERTBXGMFES 36 RCPRE=901.36FES 36 RCPRE=901.40185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313WH
YDSTHYDSS910.1903.6904.8903.1908.7X XSITE BENCHMARKSPIKE IN EAST FACE OF POLEELEV.=904.23OTVOTVOTVOTVOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOECIVIL DEFENSE SIRENG G G G G G G G GGGIIIIIII
IOE OEHOUSEGARAGESHEDSHEDCONC.FOUNDATIONCONC. FOUNDATIONCOLLAPSED SILO FOUNDATIONCOLLAPSED SILO FOUNDATIONBRICK FOUNDATIONBRICK FOUNDATION900902904906908910 910912912914914916916900902904906
908
910912
906 906908908 910912906906908908910910912912906906906906908908908910910
908
908910
910
912
914916916
904
906
908
910
912
914
916
90
6
908
910
912
914908 908
90
8
9109109109
1
0912 912912912914914914914906906908 910910906906908908 906906908910910
91491
69169049049069069089109089109129149169009029049069089109069069
0
8
910
912
914
91691091
2
91
4 910910 910912914906906
908
9
0
8
910
912
914908908910906906908
9
0
4904 9069069089
1
0910910 PID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL LEXISTING SITE AREA = 5.15 ACRESOR 224395 SF333333603333333349.7760.00GARAGEHOUSESTSTSTINV=898.88SSST>>>>>>EXCEPTIONN00°22'33"W 150.00 ANOKA COUNTY CIM AT THE NW CORNEROF SEC. 13 TWP. 31, RNG. 22, ANOKACOUNTY, MINNESOTA>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>STMHRIM: 912.60INL (NE): 899.18INL (N): 899.18INV: 899.18STMHRIM: 912.97INL (SE): 899.37INL (N): 899.64INV: 899.37STMHRIM: 913.52INL (SW): 909.26INL (SE): 899.61INV: 899.70STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.42INL (SE): 899.84INL (NE): 909.24INV: 899.84STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.87INV: 909.81STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 914.00INL (NW): 909.88INV: 909.86STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.79INV: 910.10STMHRIM: 904.98INL (N): 900.02INV: 900.02STMHRIM: 908.32INV: 904.90STMHRIM: 904.42INV: 902.90STMHRIM: 906.32INL (W): 902.57INL (N): 900.52INV: 900.52>>>>>>STMHRIM: 904.96INL (N): 900.84INV: 900.84STMHRIM: 904.75INV: 901.17STMHRIM: 905.78INV=901.98STMHRIM: 906.38INV=902.78SS>>>STMHRIM: 914.62INV: 893.29>>51313551113131313717131010PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONNORTH050100 :Curb Removal:Tree Removal:Structure and / or Pavement Removal:Construction Limits:Tree Protection:Soil BoringBORING-ELEV.Obtain permits for demolition, clearing, and disposal prior to beginning.Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning demolition and clearing.See Sheet C3.1 for erosion prevention and sediment control measures that must be in place prior to disturbances to site.Building demolition: verify with owner that building has been cleared of regulated materials requiring special handling or disposal.Remove structure, columns, canopies, footings, foundations, and any associated construction in its entirety. Refer to Architecturaland Structural for removal limits.Dimensions shown for removal are approximate. Coordinate with new construction to ensure appropriate removal of existing facilities.Pavement sawcut. Remove concrete walks and curbing to the nearest existing joint beyond construction limits.Complete demolition with minimal disruption of traffic. Coordinate lane closures with the regulatory authority and provide advancenotification to affected emergency response providers.Provide barricades, lights, signs, traffic control, and other measures necessary for protection and safety of the public and maintainthroughout construction.Protect structures, utilities, trees, plant material, sod, and adjacent property from damage during construction unless noted forremoval. Damage shall be repaired to equal or better condition at no additional cost. Refer to detail #2, sheet C7.1 for tree protection.Abandon wells and remove on site sewage facilities prior to any other demolition in accordance with requirements of regulatoryauthorities.Refer to tree preservation plan for additional information.Remove existing site features including, but not limited to, underground utilities, paving, curbing, walkways, fencing, retaining walls,screen walls, aprons, lighting, related foundations, signage, bollards, landscaping, and stairways within the construction limits unlessnoted otherwise.Coordinate removal, relocation, termination, and re-use of existing private utility services and appurtenances with the utilitycompanies. Restore electric handholes, pullboxes, powerpoles, guylines, and structures disturbed by construction in accordance withutility owner requirements.Existing piping and conduits may be abandoned in-place if filled with sand and if not in location of proposed building or in conflict withproposed utilities or structures. Terminate existing services at the supply side in conformance with provider's standards.Haul demolition debris off-site to a facility approved by regulatory authorities for the handling of demolition debris, unless notedotherwise.Existing hydrant and gate valve to be relocated.2.3.4.6.8.9.12.14.15.16.GENERAL NOTESLEGENDDEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTESFor construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.:Utility Line Removal:Mass Tree Removal--------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C1.1EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITIONC100HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 20255.7.11.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONBENCHMARKProject Benchmark:MNDOT GSID Station #92391Station Name: 0282 LLocation: In Lino Lakes, 1.4 miles North along interstate highway 35E from the junction of interstate highway 35E and County 14, atinterstate highway 35E milepoint 124.80, 93.1 feet west of southbound interstate highway 35E, 7.0 feet east of a fence line, 1.3 feet eastof a witness post.Elevation = 909.47 (NAVD 88)Site Benchmark:Type: SpikeLocation = Spike in East face of pole, located on West side of property.Elevation = 904.23 (NAVD 88)The North 660 feet of the West 440 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 31, Range 22,except the North 150 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION DEVICES PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURBANCE.MAINTAIN UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE.8' O.C.2.5'4'(TYP)NO SCALETREE PROTECTION1DRIPLINEPOLYETHYLENE SAFETY NETTING, COLOR: ORANGE.THREE TIES PER POST.DRIPLINE
6.5' STEEL T-POST, 1.25 lb/LF, POSITION AT DRIPLINE,SPACED EIGHT (8) FEET ON CENTER.5" MULCH LAYER13.10.17.
STSTST660.00150.00440.00SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 660 FEETSOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 150 FEETNORTH LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22WEST LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22
EAST LINE OF THE
WEST 440 FEETDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WATERMARK 5TH ADDITIONDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 5TH ADDITION DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 6TH ADDITION 6060 PID: 12-31-22-33-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0032MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0059MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0060MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0061MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0062MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0063MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0034MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0035MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0038MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0039MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0040US HOME LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0050WATERMARK MASTER HOAPID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)PID: 13-31-22-22-0002KOMINSKI LUTHERTBXGMFES 36 RCPRE=901.36FES 36 RCPRE=901.40185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313WH
YDSTH
YDSS910.1903.6904.8903.1908.7X XSITE BENCHMARKSPIKE IN EAST FACE OF POLEELEV.=904.23OTVOTVOTVOTVOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE OECIVIL DEFENSE SIRENG G G G G G G G GGGIIIIIII
IOE OEHOUSEGARAGE
SHEDSHEDCONC.FOUNDATIONCONC. FOUNDATIONCOLLAPSED SILO FOUNDATIONCOLLAPSED SILO FOUNDATIONBRICK FOUNDATIONBRICK FOUNDATION90
0
902904906908910 910912912914914916916
900
902
904
906
908 900902
904
906
908
910912
906 906908908 910912906906908908910910912912906906906906908908908
910
910
908
908910
910
912
914916916
904
906
908
910
912
914
916
90
6
908
910
912
914908 908
90
8
9109109109
1
0912 912912912914914914914906906908 910910906906908908900902904906908908908910910910910910912912914914 906906 908908908910910 91091491
69169049049069069089109089109129149169009029049069089109069069
0
8
910
912
914
91691091
2
91
4 910910 910912914906906
908
9
0
8
910
912
914908908910
9069069089
0
4904 9069069089
1
0910910 PID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL LEXISTING SITE AREA = 5.15 ACRESOR 224395 SF333333603333333349.7760.00GARAGEHOUSESTSTSTINV=898.88SSSSSTINV=900.36>>>>>>SSMHRE=915.06INV=892.08EXCEPTIONN00°22'33"W 150.00 ANOKA COUNTY CIM AT THE NW CORNEROF SEC. 13 TWP. 31, RNG. 22, ANOKACOUNTY, MINNESOTA>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>STMHRIM: 912.60INL (NE): 899.18INL (N): 899.18INV: 899.18STMHRIM: 912.97INL (SE): 899.37INL (N): 899.64INV: 899.37STMHRIM: 913.52INL (SW): 909.26INL (SE): 899.61INV: 899.70STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.42INL (SE): 899.84INL (NE): 909.24INV: 899.84STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.87INV: 909.81STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 914.00INL (NW): 909.88INV: 909.86STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.79INV: 910.10STMHRIM: 904.98INL (N): 900.02INV: 900.02STMHRIM: 908.32INV: 904.90STMHRIM: 904.42INV: 902.90STMHRIM: 906.32INL (W): 902.57INL (N): 900.52INV: 900.52>>>>>>STMHRIM: 904.96INL (N): 900.84INV: 900.84STMHRIM: 904.75INV: 901.17STMHRIM: 905.78INV=901.98STMHRIM: 906.38INV=902.78SSSS>>>>STMHRIM: 914.62INV: 893.29STMHRIM: 915.06>>PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONNORTH050100 GENERAL NOTESFor construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.--------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C1.2NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT PLANC102HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025LEGAL DESCRIPTIONBENCHMARKProject Benchmark:MNDOT GSID Station #92391Station Name: 0282 LLocation: In Lino Lakes, 1.4 miles North along interstate highway 35E from the junction of interstate highway 35E and County 14, atinterstate highway 35E milepoint 124.80, 93.1 feet west of southbound interstate highway 35E, 7.0 feet east of a fence line, 1.3 feet eastof a witness post.Elevation = 909.47 (NAVD 88)Site Benchmark:Type: SpikeLocation = Spike in East face of pole, located on West side of property.Elevation = 904.23 (NAVD 88)The North 660 feet of the West 440 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 31, Range 22,except the North 150 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
STSTST660.00150.00440.00SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 660 FEETSOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 150 FEETNORTH LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22WEST LINE OF SECTION 13, TWP. 31, RNG. 22
EAST LINE OF THE
WEST 440 FEETDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF WATERMARK 5TH ADDITIONDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 5TH ADDITION DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER WATERMARK 6TH ADDITION 6060 PID: 12-31-22-33-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0032MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0059MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0060MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0061MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0062MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0063MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0034MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0035MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0038MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0039MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0040US HOME LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0050WATERMARK MASTER HOAPID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)PID: 13-31-22-22-0002KOMINSKI LUTHERTBXH
YDSTHYDSS910.1903.6904.8903.1908.7SITE BENCHMARKSPIKE IN EAST FACE OF POLEELEV.=904.23OTVOTVOTVOTVOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOECIVIL DEFENSE SIRENG G G G G G G G GIIIIIII
IPID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L3333336033333333STSTSTSSST>>>>>>EXCEPTIONANOKA COUNTY CIM AT THE NW CORNEROF SEC. 13 TWP. 31, RNG. 22, ANOKACOUNTY, MINNESOTA>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SS>>>>>-0+27.260+000+501+001+502+002+503+003+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+43.61LP:909.242+15.02913.07909.37911.74913.64 914.24 914.84 915.44
911.40909.94913.24 913.94 914.54 915.147632 SQ. FT.0.18 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.11506 SQ. FT.0.26 Ac.30600 SQ. FT.0.70 Ac.47666 SQ. FT.1.09 Ac.7619 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.60.0127.0127.060.060.060.060.060.060.060.0128.82 0 .1 40.0 60.0127.0127.0127.060.0 127.060.0 127.060.0 60.0 60.0
127.060.0127.0127.0127.0127.060.060.060.060.0
60.060.060.060.060.0115.1 127.0127.060.040.078.558.919.0152.7303.0510.0 66.018.234.958.87623 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.12345671234567BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2OUTLOT AFFE=917.5LFE=910.0FFE=917.2LFE=909.7FFE=918.0LFE=910.5FFE=918.4LFE=910.9FFE=918.7LFE=911.2FFE=918.5LFE=911.0FFE=918.0LFE=910.5FFE=917.7LFE=910.2FFE=917.3LFE=909.8FFE=917.3LFE=909.8FFE=917.0LFE=909.5BUILDING SETBACKOSAKIS STREET 7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.7620 SQ. FT.0.17 Ac.BUILDING SETBACKEOF8" W.M. DIPNWLBTM100 YR-HWL100 YR-HWLNWLNWL100 YR-HWLEOF EOFR80'
R80'R.O.W. 60'B to B 32'25'25'10'10'25'25'RIGHT-OF-WAYDEDICATIONDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTR46'R25'RETAINING WALLRETAINING WALLSIDEWALKSIDEWALKRETAINING WALLTEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENTTEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENTS00°22'33"E 2645.55
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONNORTH050100 --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C2.1PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLANC200HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025The Property is Zoned R-2 Zone (Two Family Residential District)Adjacent Properties Zoning:North: R-RuralSouth: PUDEast: PUDWest: Right-of-way - Arterial StreetAdjacent Properties Land Use:North: Rural ResidentialSouth: Single Family ResidentialEast: Single Family ResidentialWest: Right-of-way - Arterial StreetBuilding Setback Information is as follows:Front Yard (Local or Minor Collector Street) = 25 ft.Rear Yard = 25 ft.Side Yard = 10 ft.Side Yard Zero lot line = Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied to a common wall of a two family dwelling unit.Buffer = Where a side or rear lot line abuts a collector or arterial street a 15 foot wide buffer shall be providedArterial Street = 40 ft.Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage = 65%Lot Coverage Information is as follows:Lot Area Minimum = 15,000 s.f. = 0.34 ac.Lot Width Minimum = 50 ft.Lot Depth Minimum = 125 ft.Total Existing Site Area = 224,395 s.f. = 5.15 ac.Right-of-way Dedication = 30,600 s.f. = 0.7 ac.Total Net Site Area = 193,795 s.f. = 4.45 ac.ImperviousPerviousTotal224,395157,71166,684s.fs.f.s.f.ImperviousProposed:TotalPerviousExisting:224,39515,464208,931s.f.s.f.s.f.5.153.621.535.150.3554.80Obtain all necessary permits for construction within, or use of, public right-of-way.The digital file, which can be obtained from the Engineer, shall be used for staking. Discrepancies between the drawings and thedigital file shall be reported to the Engineer. The building footprint, as shown on these drawings, and the digital file, shall becompared to the structural drawings prior to staking.Building layout angles are parallel with or perpendicular to the property line at the location indicated.Dimensions shown are to back of curb and exterior face of building unless noted otherwise.2.3.4.5.GENERAL NOTESAREA SUMMARYZONING AND SETBACK SUMMARYSITE PLAN NOTESFor construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.100.0%70.3%29.7%100.0%6.8%93.2%ac.ac.ac.ac.ac.ac.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONBENCHMARKProject Benchmark:MNDOT GSID Station #92391Station Name: 0282 LLocation: In Lino Lakes, 1.4 miles North along interstate highway 35E from the junction of interstate highway 35E and County 14, atinterstate highway 35E milepoint 124.80, 93.1 feet west of southbound interstate highway 35E, 7.0 feet east of a fence line, 1.3 feet eastof a witness post.Elevation = 909.47 (NAVD 88)Site Benchmark:Type: SpikeLocation = Spike in East face of pole, located on West side of property.Elevation = 904.23 (NAVD 88)The North 660 feet of the West 440 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 31, Range 22,except the North 150 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.LEGENDLOT DATA TABLEARE SHOWN THUS:DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSBeing 10 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwiseshown and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines asshown on the plat.10(Not to Scale)101010Existing EasementProposed EasementProposed SetbackProperty LineUnderlying Parcel LineInterior Lot LineParcelArea (SF)Area (Acres)R.O.W. Dedication 20th Avenue (C.S.A.H. No. 54) 30,6000.70Block1, Lot1 7,6230.18Block1, Lot2 7,6200.17Block1, Lot3 7,6200.17Block1, Lot4 7,6200.17Block1, Lot5 7,6200.17Block1, Lot6 7,6200.17Block1, Lot7 7,6320.18Block2, Lot1 11,5060.26Block2, Lot2 7,6200.17Block2, Lot3 7,6200.17Block2, Lot4 7,6200.17Block2, Lot5 7,6200.17Block2, Lot6 7,6200.17Block2, Lot7 7,6190.17Outlot A 47,6661.09
STSTST6060 PID: 12-31-22-33-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0032MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 12-31-22-33-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0059MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0060MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0061MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0062MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0063MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0034MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0035MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0036MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0037MILLROSE PROPERTIESMINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0038MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0039MILLROSE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0040US HOME LLCPID: 13-31-22-22-0050WATERMARK MASTER HOAPID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)PID: 13-31-22-22-0002KOMINSKI LUTHERTBXFES 36 RCPRE=901.36FES 36 RCPRE=901.40H
YDSTHYDSS910.1903.6904.8903.1908.7OTVOTVOTVOTVOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEGGGGGGGGGIIIIIII
I900902904906908910 910912912914914916916900902904906
908
910912
906 906908908 910912906906908908910910912912906906906906908908908910910
908
908910
910
912
914916916
904
906
908
910
912
914
916
90
6
908
910
912
914908 908
90
8
9109109109
1
0912 912912912914914914914906906908 910910906906908908 906906908910910904904906906908910908910912914916900902904906908910
9069069
0
8
910
912
914
91691091
2
91
4 910910 910912914906906
908
9
0
8
910
912
914908908910906906908
9
0
4904 9069069089
1
0910910 PID: 14-31-22-21-0002LEIBEL HAL L3333336033333333STSTSTINV=898.88ST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>STMHRIM: 912.60INL (NE): 899.18INL (N): 899.18INV: 899.18STMHRIM: 912.97INL (SE): 899.37INL (N): 899.64INV: 899.37STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.42INL (SE): 899.84INL (NE): 909.24INV: 899.84STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.87INV: 909.81STMHRIM: 904.98INL (N): 900.02INV: 900.02STMHRIM: 908.32INV: 904.90STMHRIM: 904.42INV: 902.90STMHRIM: 906.32INL (W): 902.57INL (N): 900.52INV: 900.52>>>>>>STMHRIM: 904.96INL (N): 900.84INV: 900.84STMHRIM: 904.75INV: 901.17STMHRIM: 905.78INV=901.98STMHRIM: 906.38INV=902.78>>>>>-0+27.260+000+501+001+502+002+503+003+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+43.61LP:909.242+15.02913.07909.37911.74913.64 914.24 914.84 915.44
911.40909.94913.24 913.94 914.54 915.14 6.4%5.2%5.8%5.7%6.0%((908.9))
8' BF 909.4
WO
TF 917.7GF 917.4((908.9))8' BF 909.4WOTF 917.7GF 917.4
((909.1))
8' BF 909.6
WO*TF 917.9GF* 916.6 ((908.5))8' BF 909.0WOTF 917.3GF 917.0((908.1))8' BF 908.6WOTF 916.9GF 916.6((907.7))8' BF 908.2WOTF 916.5GF 916.2((908.3))8' BF 908.8WO*TF 917.1GF* 915.8((907.9))8' BF 908.4WO*TF 916.7GF* 915.4((907.5))8' BF 908.0WO*TF 916.3GF* 915.0
((908.5))
8' BF 909.0
WO**TF 917.3GF** 915.0
((908.9))
8' BF 909.4
WO**TF 917.7GF** 915.4
((909.3))
8' BF 909.8
WO**TF 918.1GF** 915.8
((908.7))
8' BF 909.2
WO*TF 917.5GF* 916.2
((908.5))
8' BF 909.0
WO
TF 917.3GF 917.05.4%5.5%5.4%5.5%5.7%5.8%6.0%6.6%5.1%12345671234567BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2OUTLOT AFFE=917.5LFE=910.0FFE=917.2LFE=909.7FFE=918.0LFE=910.5FFE=918.4LFE=910.9FFE=918.7LFE=911.2FFE=918.5LFE=911.0FFE=918.0LFE=910.5FFE=917.7LFE=910.2FFE=917.3LFE=909.8FFE=917.3LFE=909.8FFE=917.0LFE=909.5OSAKIS STREET>>>>>>>>>>>>904902898896902906908
908912914914
908904904
904904 9089
0
8
9
1
0
9
1
2
9
1
4
9
1
6
906908912
914916916916914
912
904906908912
914
908
908908914908904 902904902 904906908910912914914908910912914914912908904908910912914914908910912914908910908910912914916916916 908908910912914916908910912914916 912914910
916
906
908902898 904 906906906908906908
912
914 15.26.08.510.26.06.06.06.06.06.015.214.914.514.113.813.09.69.17.69.215.215.214.914.514.113.86.46.76.95.33.45.38.811.6POND 9P100-YR HWL= 905.57NWL = 904.00OUT = 904.00BTM = 896.00906
906
908
910
912
914910912914
908
910
912
914
916
916EOFEOF THROUGH36" PIPEINV=901.36EOF THROUGH 36" PIPEINV=904.90EOF= 905.578" W.M. DIP NWLBTM100 YR-HWL100 YR-HWLNWLNWL100 YR-HWL05.57910912914EOF EOFDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTC7.11C7.13C7.11C7.51C7.51C7.14C7.143310' AQUATIC BENCH10' AQUATICBENCH10' AQUATICBENCH16.50 TW17.00 TW08.80 TW13.40 TW14.00 TW08.70 TW14.00 BW11.00 BW14.00 BW11.00 BW08.70 BW08.80 BW08.80 TW16.70 TW13.60 TW08.60 TW17.40 TW14.40 TW13.70 BW10.60 BW14.40 BW08.50 BW08.70 BW08.50 BWPROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONNORTH050100 --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C3.1GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING &EROSION CONTROL PLANC300HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025T/W XXX.XX :Top of WallB/W XXX.XX :Bottom of WallContact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning grading.Refer to the Geotechnical Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical Services, Dated 05/06/2025, for additional information on backfillmaterial and groundwater conditions.Remove topsoil from grading areas and stockpile sufficient quantity for reuse. Materials may be mined from landscape areas for useon site and replaced with excess organic material with prior Owner approval.Remove surface and ground water from excavations. Provide initial lifts of stable foundation material if exposed soils are wet andunstable.Rough grade Building Pad to 12 Inches below Finished Floor Elevation (FFE).Refer to Structural Specifications for earthwork requirements for building pads.An Independent Testing Firm shall verify the removal of organic and unsuitable soils, soil correction, and compaction and provideperiodic reports to the Owner.Place and compact fill using lift thicknesses matched to soil type and compaction equipment to obtain specified compactionthroughout the lift.Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet whichshall be compacted to 100%. Compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimummoisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified ProctorDensity (ASTM D1557).Coordinate with Architectural for building stoop locations. Slopes shown on adjacent walks and pavements should continue overstoops.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.Install perimeter sediment controls prior to beginning work and maintain for duration of construction. Remove controls after areascontributing runoff are permanently stabilized and dispose of off site.Install inlet protection: Wimco RD or CG models as appropriate, or approved equal. Maintain protection until project is stabilized.Limit soil disturbance to the grading limits shown. Schedule operations to minimize length of exposure of disturbed areas.Management practices shown are the minimum requirement. Install and maintain additional controls as work proceeds to preventerosion and control sediment carried by wind or water.Refer to SWPPP Notes on Sheet C3.3 for additional requirements.Excavate ponds early in the construction sequence. Remove sediment from ponds periodically and after areas contributing runoffare permanently stabilized.Contractor shall prevent sediment laden water from entering the filtration / infiltration system until the site is completely stabilized.Stabilization must be started immediately to limit soil erosion when the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarilyor permanently ceased and will not resume for 14 calendar days.Seed, Sod, Mulch, Erosion Control Blanket, and Fertilizer shall meet the following Specifications, as modified. Seeded areas withouterosion control blanket shall be disc mulched.ItemSpecification NumberSodMNDOT 3878SeedMNDOT 3876 MN Type 21-111 @ 100 lb./ac. - Temporary Erosion Control - Temporary Erosion Control, May 1 - Jul 31MN Type 21-112 @ 100 lb./ac. - Temporary Erosion Control - Temporary Erosion Control, Aug 1 - Oct 31MN Type (25-141 @ 59 lbs./ac. for General Roadside, 25-151 @ 120 lb./ac. for Residential Turf) - Permanent TurfMulchMNDOT 3882(MNDOT Type 1 @ 2 ton/ac., Disc Anchored)Erosion Control BlanketMNDOT 3885(MNDOT 4N (for 24 mo.))FertilizerMNDOT 3881General PlacementMNDOT 2575See Landscape Sheets for permanent turf and landscape establishment.Scrape adjacent streets clean daily and sweep clean weekly.2.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.GRADING NOTESGENERAL NOTESLEGEND:Inlet Protection:Tip Out Curb:Silt Fence:Pavement Sawcut:Construction Limits:Vehicle Tracking PadESTIMATED QUANTITY2 ea.1 ea.1940 ft.SYMBOLDESCRIPTIONEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTESFor construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.:Compost or Bio LogX ft.:Erosion Control Blanket9,140 SF3NO SCALETYPICAL LOT DETAIL1NOTES:1. GARAGE LOCATION INDICATED BY DRIVEWAY.:TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION:FRONT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION:* DENOTES 1' DISTANCE GARAGE FLOOR DEVIATES (DROPS) FROM TYPICALMAIN STREETBLK 15X 105.0X 105.0X106.5X106.5DENOTES PROPOSED LOT CORNERELEVATIONSDENOTES DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT SIDE YARDDENOTES BUILDINGSETBACKS BUILDING TYPES:FB = FULL BASEMENTWO = WALK OUTLO = LOOK OUTSOG = SLAB ON GRADE* = 1 FOOT GFO DROP** =2 FOOT GFO DROPDENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW4.5%DENOTES DRIVEWAY SLOPEAND LOCATION:REAR ELEVATION:BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATIONGF=108.0*TF=109.3*8' BF 101.3((100.8))WO25'5'25'35'FIRST FLOOR1.0' TOPSOIL MAX.113.0' HOLD DOWN1.0' TOPSOIL MAX.1315'7.5'PER PLAN'111R/WLCNO SCALEFULL BASEMENT WALK OUT(FBWO)2ANY FILL MUST LIE ON SUITABLE BEARING SOIL. (BOTTOMMUST BE APPROVED BY SOILS ENGINEER.)5'.5'2%
M
IN
3
3%
MAXSTRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP)5'ANY AVAILABLESOIL MATERIALUNLESSOTHERWISEDIRECTEDBY ENG.ANY AVAILABLESOIL MATERIALUNLESS OTHERWISEDIRECTED BY ENG.BASEMENT FLOOR= 92.0GARAGE FLOOR= 100.00.67' HOLD DOWN
1 MilePROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C3.3SWPPPC303HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURESEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLSITE EVALUATION / ASSESSMENT / PLANNINGOperator must develop pollution prevention management measures, implement good housekeeping BMPs, must follow allapplicable federal, state, and local building codes, Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), and the general conditionsand general requirements of the construction contract.The Operator shall minimize the exposure to stormwater of any of the products, material, or wastes stored on site that may washdownstream or contaminate stormwater.Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants must be under cover.Chemicals and landscape materials shall be under cover to prevent the discharge of pollutants.Operator to track progress of the following items on site maps: portable toilets, material storage areas, vehicle and equipment fuelingand maintenance areas, concrete washouts, paint and stucco washouts, dumpsters or other trash and debris containers, spill kits,stockpiles, any other non-structural non-storm water management BMPs, any temporarily removed structural BMPs, any changes tothe structural BMPs.Solid waste: collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolitiondebris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements.Hazardous waste: oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills,leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal ofhazardous waste or materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. Ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable.Portable toilets must be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over.Concrete and other washout waste: operator must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washoutoperations. The liquid and solid wastes must not contact the ground, and the containment must be designed so that it does not resultin runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCArules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposalof concrete and other washout wastes.External vehicle washing: external washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site.Runoff must be contained and waste properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowed on site.Operator shall take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area wherethey will be loaded or unloaded as detailed in the Permit.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.See Grading, Drainage, Paving and Erosion Control sheets for the location and type of temporary erosion prevention and sedimentcontrol BMPs. See Grading and Drainage, Utility, and Landscape sheets for the location and type of permanent erosion preventionand sediment control BMPs.Minimize Disturbed Areas and Protect Natural Features and SoilAppropriate construction practices (e.g. construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading) shall be used tominimize erosion.Areas not to be disturbed (buffers, infiltration basins, etc.) shall be protected with construction or silt fence before work begins.Operator shall develop methods to minimize soil compaction outside of building pads, pavement areas and utility trenches and shalluse tracked equipment wherever practicable.Topsoil shall be salvaged and reused to the extent practicable.Phase Construction ActivityOperator must not disturb more land than can be effectively inspected and maintained.Sediment control practices shall be established on all down gradient perimeters before any upgradient land disturbing activities begin.These practices shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established in accordance with the Permit.The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted to accommodate short-term activities such as clearing orgrubbing, or passage of vehicles. Any short-term activity must be completed as quickly as possible and the sediment controlpractices shall be installed immediately after the activity is completed. However, sediment control practices shall be installed beforethe next precipitation event even if the activity is not complete.Control Stormwater Flowing onto and Through the ProjectThe normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of theconstruction site, or diverts water around the site, shall be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point ofdischarge into any surface water.Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet shall be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water.Stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditches or swales shall be complete within 14 days afterconnecting to a surface water and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased.Temporary or permanent ditches or swales that are being used as a sediment containment system (with properly designed rock ditchchecks, bio rolls, silt dikes etc.) do not need to be stabilized. These areas shall be stabilized within 24 hours after no longer beingused as a sediment containment system.Stabilize SoilsAll exposed soil areas, including stockpiles, must be stabilized.Stabilization must be started immediately to limit soil erosion when the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarilyor permanently ceased and will not resume for 14 calendar days. Stabilization must be complete within 14 days of cessation ofconstruction activity.Temporary soil stockpiles shall have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot be placed in surface waters, includingstorm water conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater.Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g. clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concretestockpiles, sand stockpiles) and the constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces, are exempt from thisrequirement.Perimeter sediment control measures must be in place prior to the placement of any stockpiles.Any erosion control netting shall be "wildlife friendly" and of a natural type that can decompose and shall have non-welded moveablejoints.Any sediment control device made of soil must be stabilized within 24 hours.Protect SlopesOperator shall avoid work on slopes with a grade of 3:1 or greater when practicable. Grading on slopes with a grade of 3:1 or steeperwill require techniques such as phasing and stabilization practices designed for steep slopes(e.g. slope draining and terracing).Protect Storm Drain InletsAll storm drain inlets shall be protected by appropriate BMPs during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to theinlet have been stabilized. Inlet protection may be temporarily removed if a specific safety concern has been identified.Provide Energy Dissipation at all Pipe Outlets within 24 HoursAfter connection to a surface water or permanent stormwater treatment system.Establish Perimeter Controls and Sediment BarriersPrior to disturbing soils on a project site, establish sediment control BMPs on all down-gradient perimeters and where site dischargesto public waters.Retain Sediment On-site and Control Dewatering PracticesDischarge shall not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels, adversely affect receiving water or impact wetlands, ordownstream properties. Discharge points shall be adequately protected from erosion and scour by accepted energy dissipationmeasures.Discharge water containing oil or grease shall be treated to remove oil or grease prior to discharge to surface waters.Refer to Permit requirements for temporary or permanent sediment basins.Discharge shall be photographed at the beginning of discharge and at least every 24 hours afterward, while discharge is occurring.If nuisance conditions result from dewatering, dewatering shall be stopped until nuisance condition can be remedied.Establish Stabilized Construction ExitsVehicle tracking pads shall be established as shown on the Grading, Drainage, Paving and Erosion Control sheet(s) to minimizetracking of sediment from the construction site onto adjacent streets.Infiltration Basin ProtectionOperator must not excavate infiltration systems to final grade or within three (3) feet of final grade until the contributing drainage areahas been constructed and fully stabilized unless rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls have been installed.When excavating an infiltration system to within three (3) feet of final grade, operator shall mark off and protect the area from heavyconstruction equipment to prevent compaction of soils.Dewatering and Basin DrainingPermittees must discharge turbid or sediment-laden waters related to dewatering or basin draining to a temporary or permanentsediment basin. Discharges must not cause erosion or scour near the discharge points.Remove Sediment from Surface WatersAll sediment deposits and deltas must be removed from surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainagesystems, and the removal areas restabilized within seven (7) days.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.Permittees must ensure that a trained person will inspect the entire construction site at least once every seven (7) days during activeconstruction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5-inches in 24 hours.Records of inspections shall include all maintenance activities and must be recorded within 24 hours of the inspection and retainedwith the SWPPP.Inspections shall include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, and infiltration areas. Additionally, areasadjacent to the project shall be inspected.Surface waters on or adjacent to the site must be inspected for evidence of erosion or sediment deposition.Permittees must record all inspection and maintenance activities within 24 hours of being conducted as detailed in the Permit.Inspection Records content shall include:A.Date and time of inspections;B.Name of persons conduction inspections;C.Findings of inspections, including specific locations where corrective actions are needed;D.Corrective actions taken including dates, times, and the party taking the corrective action;E.Dates of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch in 24 hours (refer to Permit for measurement requirements);F.Any discovered discharge must be recorded, including photographs, descriptions of discharge (color, odor, settled orsuspended solids, oil sheen, or other obvious indicators of pollution), and specific location of discharge location;G.Any amendments to the Permit as a result of inspections must be documented within seven calendar days as described in thePermitH.All photographs of dewatering activities and documentation of nuisance conditions resulting from dewatering.BMP Maintenance:A.Nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired or replaced by the end of the next business day after discovery unless a different timeframe is indicated.B.Follow the designer's or manufacturer's recommended maintenance procedures for all BMPs.C.Remove sediment from BMPs when the depth of sediment has reached 1/2 the height of the BMP and properly dispose ofsediment into controlled areas to prevent soil from returning to the BMP during subsequent rain events.D.Remove sediment from paved roadways within one calendar day of discovery.E.Remove sediment from around BMPs protecting storm drain inlets.F.Surface waters with evidence of sediment deposition must be stabilized and sediment removed within seven calendar daysof discovery, or as stated by the Permit.G.Ensure that construction support activities, including borrow areas, waste areas, contractor work areas, and material storageareas and dedicated concrete and asphalt batch plants are cleaned and maintained.H.Replace damaged BMPs that no longer operate effectively.Add BMPs as needed during construction to minimize erosion and prevent sediment from leaving the site.Any basin that has the water quality volume reduced by half shall be drained and have the sediment removed within 72 hours ofdiscovery.Any temporaty or permanent sediment basin that has the water quality volume reduced by half shall be drained and have thesediment removed within 72 hours of discovery.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.RECORD KEEPING / RECORD RETENTIONThe SWPPP (original or copies), including all changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records, shall be kept at the site duringconstruction by the Owner / Operator who has operational control of that portion of the site. The SWPPP can be kept in either thefield office or in an on site vehicle during normal working hours.All Owners(s) must keep the SWPPP, along with the following additional records, on file for three (3) years after submittal of theNotice of Termination (NOT). This does not include any records after submittal of the NOT.The following is a list of records that shall be kept at the project site available for inspectors to review:·Copy of the SWPPP, with any modifications;·Inspection and maintenance records;·Permanent operation and maintenance agreements;·Calculations for the design of temporary and permanent stormwater management systems;·Any other permits required for the project;·Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction; and·All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right-of-way, contracts,covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance1.2.3.LOG OF CHANGES TO THE SWPPP / AMENDMENTSThe Owner / Operator(s) must amend the SWPPP within seven (7) days to include additional requirements, such asadditional or modified BMPs, designs to correct problems identified during inspections, or address situations as detailedin the Permit.1.FINAL STABILIZATIONThe Owner / Operator(s) must ensure final stabilization of the site. Final stabilization includes:A.Ensuring all areas have permanent cover.B.Vegetative areas must have perennial cover with a density of 70% of expected final growth.1.POST CONSTRUCTION / PERMANENT BMPSSee Grading and Drainage, Utility, and Landscape sheets for post construction and permanent stormwater BMPs.1.TERMINATION OF COVERAGEOwner / Operator(s) wishing to terminate coverage under the Permit must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to theMPCA. Compliance with the Permit is required until a NOT is submitted. Refer to the Permit for details. Conditions forsubmitting a NOT include:A.Site must have achieved final stabilization (refer to section above).B.The permanent stormwater treatment and conveyance systems must be clean and all accumulated sediment removed.C.All temporary synthetic erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs must be removed from the site and disposed ofproperly.D.Single Family Residential only - Permit termination on individual lots occurs once building construction is complete, permanent or temporary erosion prevention and downgradient perimeter control is complete, the residence sells to thehomeowner, and the permittee distributes the MPCA's "Homeowner Fact Sheet" to the homeowner.1.The Operator shall have primary responsibility and significant authority for the development, implementation, maintenance, inspectionand amendments to the approved SWPPP. Duties include but are not limited to:·Ensuring full compliance with the SWPPP and the Permit·Implementing all elements of the SWPPP, including but not limited to:··Implementing prompt and effective erosion and sediment control measures··Implementing all non-storm water management, and good housekeeping BMPs ensuring that no materials other thanStorm water are discharged in quantities, which will have an adverse effect on receiving waters or storm drain systems,etc.·Conducting routine inspections and maintenance·Ensuring elimination of all unauthorized discharges·Coordinating to ensure all of the necessary corrections / repairs are made immediately, and that the project complies with theSWPPP, the Permit, and approved plans at all times.1.SWPPP CONTACT AND TRAINING INFORMATIONOwner:Hampton Companiesattn: Dan Brown1824 Buerkle Rd.White Bear Lake, MN 55110Phone: 651-295-2459Email Address: dan@hamptonocs.comOperator:To Be Determined. Contact Owner until Contractor Is Selected.Long Term Maintenance And Operation:To Be Determined. Contact Owner until Contractor Is Selected.SWPPP Designer:John Ortiz, RLALandform Professional Services105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401612-252-9070jortiz@landform.netCertification: U of MN, Design of Construction SWPPP, Exp. May 31, 2027SWPPP Inspector / Manager:To Be Determined. Contact Owner until Contractor And SWPPP Inspector / Manager is selected.BMP Installation And Repair:To Be Determined. Contact Owner until BMP Installer And Maintainer is selected.Certification: , Exp.1.2.3.4.5.6.WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE OF SITESCHEDULE OF BMP INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYInstall perimeter sediment control BMPs prior to start of other site work. Refer to Grading, Drainage, Paving and Erosion Controlsheet(s) for initial locations of BMPs.Protect infiltration areas with construction fencing. Install fencing prior to site grading or within 24-hours of excavating an infiltrationbasin.Construct temporary / permanent sedimentation basins prior to upland disturbance. Install perimeter sediment control BMPs aroundnormal water levels within 48-hours of completion of basin grading.Stabilize outlets from temporary / permanent sedimentation basins within 24-hours of outlet construction.Perform work in phases to minimize disturbed area at any one time. Operator to develop phasing plan prior to start of work. Openwork areas should be limited to those that can be managed and inspected within required time frames.Strip topsoil from areas to be disturbed and stockpile with perimeter sediment control BMPs. Provide stabilization if stockpile is leftlonger than 14 days.Rough grade site.Install utilities.Install small utilities (gas, electric, communications).Final grade pavement areas and compact subgrade.Lay down pavement aggregate and compact.Install curb and gutter. Backfill after a minimum of three days and provide a minimum of two rolls of sod at the back of curb.Construct building and site features.Construct site walks and patios.Provide final stabilization.Connect infiltration / filtration practices to storm sewer inlets.Remove temporary BMPs and dispose of properly.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYConstruction activity includes erosion and sediment control BMPs installation, clearing and grubbing, site grading, utility installation,building construction, paving, and landscaping.1.MN SPECIAL (PROHIBITED, RESTRICTED, OTHER) & IMPAIRED WATERS1.NPDES PERMIT AND SWPPP COMPONENTSThe current Minnesota Construction Stormwater General Permit (Permit) dated August 1, 2018 is referenced in thisdocument as the Permit.The SWPPP includes the following components:·Construction Documents prepared by Landform·Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Landform·Maintenance Plan for permanent stormwater BMPs·Geotechnical Report prepared by Haugo Geotechnical ServicesAll components must be kept onsite, or electronically available onsite, by the Operator during regular work hours. TheOperator shall contact Civil Engineer if they do not have all of the above documents.1.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN(S)This project does not have more than five ( 5) disturbed acres draining to a common location and the site does not drain to animpaired or special water, therefore a temporary sediment basin is not required. Refer to sheet(s) C3.1 for further information.Temporary sediment basins shall provide treatment to runoff before it leaves the construction site or enters surface waters. Thecontractor shall comply with the following requirements:A.Sedimentation basins must provide live storage of runoff resulting from the 2-year 24-hour rainfall event from each acredrained to the basin, with a minimum of 1,800 c.f./acre live storage volume. (Where no calculation has been performed, eachbasin shall provide at least 3,600 c.f./acre live storage.) Sedimentation basins must include a stabilized emergency overflowto prevent basin integrity failure.B.Discharge from temporary sedimentation basins will be withdrawn from the surface in order to minimize the discharge ofpollutants.Discharge from basin draining shall not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream properties. Contractor will visually checkto ensure adequate treatment has been obtained and that nuisance conditions will not result from the discharge.Any discharge observed to be occurring during the inspection shall be recorded, described, and photographed.If any proposed temporary BMPs are not working as intended refer to the "Stormwater Compliance Assistance Toolkit for SmallConstruction Operators", MPCA, 2017 for additional information. Operator shall contact the SWPPP Designer for additionalrequirements and information.1.2.3.4.5.SITE INFORMATIONSite location: Latitude: 45.181105, Longitude: -93.039985Disturbed area = 4.75 ac.Pre-construction impervious area within disturbed area = 0.36 ac.Post-construction impervious area within disturbed area = 1.53 ac.Net change in impervious area within disturbed area = 1.17 ac.Type of stormwater management:·Wet sedimentationErosion prevention and sediment control quantities are on sheets C3.1SURFACE WATER BUFFERSThere are no surface waters within or adjacent to the project boundary, therefore no buffers are required.1.Peltier Lake and Clearwater Creek are impaired based on the current USEPA 303(d) clean water act list and is within 1 mile of thissite and stormwater does not discharge to it. Impairments are for AQC, AQR, and Hg-F (Mercury), and Nutrients.A.TMDLs have been established for this impaired water for Hg-F (Mercury), and Nutrients.B.This site will meet these TMDLs using the following methods: Nothing additional required on site.DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA1.The site is not within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA).
STSTST6060 TBXFES 36 RCPRE=901.36FES 36 RCPRE=901.40STHYDSSOTVOTVOTVOTVOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEGGGGGGGGGIIIIIII
I3333336033333333STSTSTINV=898.88SSST>>>>>>SSMHRE=914.62INV=893.29>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>STMHRIM: 912.60INL (NE): 899.18INL (N): 899.18INV: 899.18STMHRIM: 912.97INL (SE): 899.37INL (N): 899.64INV: 899.37STMHRIM: 913.52INL (SW): 909.26INL (SE): 899.61INV: 899.70STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.42INL (SE): 899.84INL (NE): 909.24INV: 899.84STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.87INV: 909.81STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 914.00INL (NW): 909.88INV: 909.86STMH (PER PLANS)RIM: 913.79INV: 910.10STMHRIM: 904.98INL (N): 900.02INV: 900.02STMHRIM: 908.32INV: 904.90STMHRIM: 904.42INV: 902.90STMHRIM: 906.32INL (W): 902.57INL (N): 900.52INV: 900.52>>>>>>STMHRIM: 904.96INL (N): 900.84INV: 900.84STMHRIM: 904.75INV: 901.17STMHRIM: 905.78INV=901.98STMHRIM: 906.38INV=902.78SS>>>STMHRIM: 914.62INV: 893.29>>-0+27.260+000+501+001+502+002+503+003+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+43.61LP:909.242+15.02913.07909.37911.74913.64 914.24 914.84 915.44
911.40909.94913.24 913.94 914.54 915.14 12345671234567BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2OUTLOT AOSAKIS STREET
IIIIII I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I>I>I>I>I>I>I>>>>>>>>IPOND 9P100-YR HWL= 905.57NWL = 904.00OUT = 904.00BTM = 896.00EOFEOF THROUGH36" PIPEINV=901.36EOF THROUGH 36" PIPEINV=904.90EOF= 905.578" W.M. DIPNWLBTM100 YR-HWL100 YR-HWLNWLNWL100 YR-HWLEOF EOFCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAIN8"X6" TEEMH-115RIM: 911.02INL (NW): 897.62INV: 897.5248" DIAR-1642PER DETAIL C7.X/X62' - 10" PVC @ 0.61%129' - 10" PVC @ 0.43%MH-116RIM: 911.52INL (W): 896.96INV: 896.8648" DIAR-1642PER DETAIL C7.X/X149' - 10" PVC@ 2.66%MH-117RIM: 913.69INL (NW): 892.8948" DIAR-1642PER DETAIL C7.X/X373' - 10" PVC@ 0.35%MH-113RIM: 915.35INV: 899.4048" DIAR-1642PER DETAIL C7.X/XMH-114RIM: 913.13INL (N): 898.10INV: 898.0048" DIAR-1642PER DETAIL C7.X/X8" GV6" GVHYD6" GV10 LF 6" DIPH.B.O.E=913.18" 11.25 BEND8" 22.5 BEND8" 22.5 BEND8"X6" TEEHYD6" GV10 LF 6" DIPH.B.O.E=914.56" GV6" GVHYD6" GV10 LF 6" DIPH.B.O.E=915.88"X6" REDUCERMH-118RIM: 908.95INV: 903.902X3R-3067PER DETAIL C7.X/X31' - 18" Concrete Pipe@ 0.4%MH-119RIM: 908.95INV (N): 903.78INV: 903.472X3R-3067PER DETAIL C7.X/X125' - 15" Concrete Pipe@ 0.4%MH-120INV: 903.00PER DETAIL C7.X/XMH-121RIM: 899.13INV: 898.002X3R-3067PER DETAIL C7.X/XMH-122RIM: 906.50INV (E): 904.00INV: 904.002X3R-3067PER DETAIL C7.X/X22' - 15" Concrete Pipe@ 52.6%MH-123RIM: 893.75INV (E): 892.612X3R-3067PER DETAIL C7.X/X37' - 12" HDPE Pipe@ -16.1%ADJUST EXISTINGSTM STRUCTURERIM: 912.54ADJUST EXSTINGSTM STRUCTURERIM: 912.808" W.M. DIP8" W.M. DIP 126 L.F.8" W.M. DIP 55 L.F.8" W.M. DIP 157 L.F.8" W.M. DIP 214 L.F.PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONNORTH050100 --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C4.1SANITARY SEWER, WATER & STORMSEWER PLANC400HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025Pipe MaterialsWatermainDIP Class 52 (ANSI A21.51/AWWA C151)Water ServiceCopper Type K (ASTM B88)Public Sanitary SewerSDR 26 (ASTM: D3034, F477, & F891)Storm SewerRCP 12"-18" Class 5 (ASTM C76)Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.Contractor to field verify location and elevation of all utility points of connection prior to construction of any proposed utilities.Contractor to notify Engineer immediately if there is any discrepancy.Contractor to pothole all utility crossings prior to construction of new utilities to verify depths of existing lines. Contact Engineerimmediately if any conflicts are discovered.Provide means and measures to protect adjacent property from damage during utility installation.Pipe lengths shown are from center of structure to center of structure or end of end section.Install tracer wire with all non-conductive utilities in accordance with City of Lino Lakes Standards.Connect to City utilities in accordance with City of Lino Lakes Standards.Maintain 7.5 feet of cover on water.Deflect water to maintain 18-inch minimum outside separation at sewer crossings. Center pipe lengths to provide greatest separationbetween joints.Contact Xxx, City of Lino Lakes Department, at ###.###.#### for flushing and pressure test inspections.The water distribution system shall be disinfected per Minnesota Rules, Part 4714.The sanitary sewer system shall be tested per Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4714, Section 712.0.Provide 4-inch rigid foam (ASTM D1621) insulation on sanitary sewer less than X feet deep.All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be gastight or water tight. Approved resilient rubber joints must be used tomake watertight connections to manholes, catch basins, and other structures.Catch basins in curb and gutter are sumped 2 inches below the gutter grade. Refer to Detail X on Sheet C7.X.Irrigation sleeve to be 4 inch Schedule 80 PVC buried 24" below grade. Extend sleeves 3-feet beyond the edge of pavement. Markeach end of sleeve with 3/4-inch rebar 12 inches below finish grade. (Coordinate with irrigation contractor.)Coordinate with Private Utilities to provide electric, natural gas, and communications services to building.Xxxx will furnish and install gas service piping from the mainline to the meter and the meter. Gas service from the meter shall beinstalled by the Mechanical Contractor.Provide one X-inch PVC conduit with pull-string from existing telephone service to building.Provide conduits for cable television and other electronic communication.Coordinate with Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Drawings for locations of service connections and continuation of serviceswithin building.Compact cohesive soils in paved areas to 95% of maximum dry density, Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) except the top 3 feet whichshall be compacted to 100%. compact to 98% density where fill depth exceeds 10 feet. The soils shall be within 3% of optimummoisture content. In granular soils all portions of the embankment shall be compacted to not less than 95% of Modified ProctorDensity (ASTM D1557).Adjust structures to final grade where disturbed. Comply with requirements of Utility. Meet requirements for traffic loading in pavedareas.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.GENERAL NOTESUTILITY NOTESFor construction staking and surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.
ALN-Osakis StreetHORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'VERT. SCALE: 1"=5'895900905910915920925895900905910915920925-0+75-0+50913.70+00913.7913.50+50913.4913.1913.071+00910.8912.46909.5911.401+50909.2910.16909.0909.372+00908.9909.30908.9909.942+50909.0910.84909.1911.743+00909.5912.63909.0913.243+50908.6
913.49
907.7
913.644+00906.7
913.79
905.6
913.944+50904.8
914.09
904.8
914.245+00905.4
914.39
906.6
914.545+50907.5
914.69
908.6
914.846+00909.5
914.99
910.1
915.146+50910.5
915.29
910.4
915.447+00910.1
915.59
7+507+75PVI STA: 2+09.00PVI ELEV: 908.45K: 8.70LVC: 75.00AD: 8.62%BVCS: 1+71.50BVCE: 910.33EVCS: 2+46.50EVCE: 909.81LP STA: 2+15.02LP ELEV: 909.24PVI STA: 1+23.11PVI ELEV: 912.75K: 13.94LVC: 50.00AD: -3.59%BVCS: 0+98.11BVCE: 913.10EVCS: 1+48.11EVCE: 911.50 PVI STA: 3+43.00PVI ELEV: 913.30K: 16.57LVC: 50.00AD: -3.02%BVCS: 3+18BVCE: 912.40
EVCS: 3+68
EVCE: 913.45GRADE BREAK STA = 0+92.82ELEV = 913.175GRADE BREAK STA = 7+43.61ELEV = 915.704-1.41%0.60%-5.00%3.62%PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C6.1STREET PROFILE PLANC600HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C7.1CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC701HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025NO SCALEINLET PROTECTION4NO SCALEROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE3NO SCALETREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL2NO SCALESILT FENCE1NO SCALEPIPE CHECK BIOROLL WEIR6NO SCALEBIOROLL DITCH5RESERVEDRESERVED
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C7.2CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC701HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025NO SCALESANITARY SEWER SERVICE CLEANOUT4NO SCALESANITARY SEWER OUTSIDE DROP3NO SCALESANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 3032NO SCALESANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 3011NO SCALESPECIAL FOUNDATION FORSTABILIZING OR DEWATERING OF TRENCH7NO SCALESERVICE DETAILS6NO SCALESANITARY SEWER SERVICE5RESERVED
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C7.3CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC701HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025NO SCALEGATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATION4NO SCALETYPICAL HYDRANT DETAILS (VALVE IN BOULEVARD)3NO SCALEWATER SERVICE DETAIL2NO SCALEWATER LOWER1NO SCALEPIPE BEDDING DETAILS7NO SCALECOPPER STRAP OVER WATER MAIN FITTINGS6NO SCALEGRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD (FOR PVC)5RESERVED
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C7.4CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC701HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025NO SCALE2 X 3 CATCH BASIN4NO SCALESTORM SEWER MANHOLE 40203NO SCALESTORM SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 4020 30" OR LARGER2NO SCALESTORM SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 4020 27" OR LESS1NO SCALEWRAPPING OF STORM SEWER JOINTS8NO SCALECLEAN / OPEN STORM SEWER OUTFALL7NO SCALERIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS6NO SCALEFES PILING5
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.License No:Date:xx/xx/2025Eric T. Luth, PE50475PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION --------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003C7.5CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC701HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025NO SCALERESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY4NO SCALETYPICAL SECTION (URBAN STREET)3NO SCALEBITUMINOUS TRAIL2NO SCALECONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER1NO SCALEUTILITY LOCATION8NO SCALESTREET SECTION SMALL UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL7NO SCALESTREET MARKING SIGNS6NO SCALESTANDARD CUL-DE-SAC5
STSTST6060
20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)TBX185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313H
YDSTHYDSSOTVOTVOTVOTVOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEGGGGGGGGGIIIIIII
I900902904906908910 910912912914914916916900902904906
908
910912
906 906908908 910912906906908908910910912912906906906906908908908910910
908
908910
910
912
914916916
904
906
908
910
912
914
916
90
6
908
910
912
914908 908
90
8
9109109109
1
0912 912912912914914914914906906908 910910906906908908 906906908910910
91491
69169049049069069089109089109129149169009029049069089109069069
0
8
910
912
914
91691091
2
91
4 910910 910912914906906
908
9
0
8
910
912
914908908910906906908
9
0
4904 9069069089
1
0910910 3333336033333333STSTSTSSST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SS>>>>>12345671234567BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2OUTLOT AOSAKIS STREET
IIIIII I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EOF8" W.M. DIPNWLBTM100 YR-HWL100 YR-HWLNWLNWL100 YR-HWLEOF EOFPROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.John C. OrtizLicense No:62761Date:dd/mm/yyyyNORTH050100--------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003L1.1TREE PRESERVATION & MITIGATIONPLANL100HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.2.3.GENERAL NOTESLANDSCAPE NOTESFor construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.:Tree Removal:Construction Limits:Tree Root Protection Zone LEGEND1.A Root Protection Zone of preserved trees has been identified and represented for trees closest to the limits of grading. Astandard calculation using the City of Lino Lakes Ordiance was used to find the Root Protection Zone:RPZ = DBH x 1.0A Tree is preserved if less than 30% of the Critical Root Zone is disturbed.2.Suitable protective barriers are required around trees scheduled to be preserved and are near grading and constructionactivity. The barriers shall remain in place until they're authorized to be removed by the city or a final certificate of occupancyhas been issued.3.There shall be no movement, clearing, or storage of equipment within a designated tree protection zone.4.All clearing of oak stands shall be performed prior to April 15 or after July 15 of each season.5.If encroachment into a tree preservation area occurs that causes irreparable damage to a tree(s), the tree preservation planshall be revised to compensate for the loss.6.All tree protection areas are recommended to be designated with "Tree Save Area" signs to be posted in addition to therequired protective fencing.7.Signs requesting sub-contractor cooperation and compliance with tree protection standards are recommended for siteentrances.8.Trees shown as protected are not used towards mitigation credit and are electively preserved.PRESERVATION NOTESXXX:Existing Tree with Tree Tag #INSTALL TREE PROTECTION DEVICES PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURBANCE.MAINTAIN UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE.8' O.C.2.5'4'(TYP)NO SCALETREE PROTECTION1DRIPLINEPOLYETHYLENE SAFETY NETTING, COLOR: ORANGE.THREE TIES PER POST.DRIPLINE
6.5' STEEL T-POST, 1.25 lb/LF, POSITION AT DRIPLINE,SPACED EIGHT (8) FEET ON CENTER.5" MULCH LAYER:Silt FenceObtain permits for demolition, clearing, and disposal prior to beginning.Contact utility service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning demolition and clearing.See Sheet C3.1 for erosion prevention and sediment control measures that must be in place prior to disturbances to site.Dimensions shown for removal are approximate. Coordinate with new construction to ensure appropriate removal of existing facilities.Complete demolition with minimal disruption of traffic. Coordinate lane closures with the regulatory authority and provide advancenotification to affected emergency response providers.Provide barricades, lights, signs, traffic control, and other measures necessary for protection and safety of the public and maintainthroughout construction.Protect structures, utilities, trees, plant material, sod, and adjacent property from damage during construction unless noted forremoval. Damage shall be repaired to equal or better condition at no additional cost.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES:Basic Use AreaTag #SpeciesCaliper Inch(measured at DBH)ConditionLocationRemovedPreserved185Burr Oak12GoodOn SiteX186Burr Oak11GoodOn SiteX187Burr Oak10GoodOn SiteX188Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX189Burr Oak11GoodOn SiteX190Burr Oak13GoodOn SiteX191Burr Oak12GoodOn SiteX192Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX193Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX194Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX195Burr Oak10GoodOn SiteX196Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX197Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX198Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX199Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX200Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX201Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX202Cottonwood31GoodOn SiteX203Cottonwood39GoodOn SiteX204Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX205Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX206Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX207Burr Oak11GoodOn SiteX208Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX209Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX210Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX211Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX212Burr Oak7GoodOn SiteX213Cottonwood27GoodOn SiteX214Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX215Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX216Burr Oak13GoodOn SiteX217Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX218Burr Oak11GoodOn SiteX219Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX220Burr Oak36GoodOn SiteX221Burr Oak19GoodOffsite222Burr Oak12GoodOffsite223Burr Oak9GoodOffsite224Burr Oak8GoodOffsite225Burr Oak9GoodOffsite226Burr Oak10GoodOffsite227Burr Oak10GoodOffsite228Burr Oak6GoodOffsite229Burr Oak11GoodOffsite230Burr Oak11GoodOffsite231Burr Oak10GoodOffsite232Burr Oak7GoodOffsite233Burr Oak16GoodOffsite234Burr Oak7GoodOffsite235Burr Oak10GoodOffsite236Burr Oak7GoodOffsite237Burr Oak7GoodOffsite238Burr Oak8GoodOffsite239Spruce11GoodOffsite240Spruce17GoodOffsite241Spruce12GoodOffsite242Spruce12GoodOffsite243Spruce11GoodOffsite244Spruce11GoodOffsite245Burr Oak11GoodOffsite246Spruce11GoodOffsite247Spruce10GoodOffsite248Spruce9GoodOffsite249Spruce9GoodOffsite250Spruce14GoodOffsite251Spruce7GoodOffsite252Spruce13GoodOffsite253Burr Oak9GoodOffsite254Spruce13GoodOffsite255Burr Oak6GoodOffsite256Burr Oak8GoodOffsite257Spruce9GoodOffsite258Pine12GoodOffsite259Spruce10GoodOffsite260Maple14GoodOn SiteX261Maple10GoodOn SiteX262Spruce11GoodROW DedicationX263Spruce12GoodROW DedicationX264Spruce12GoodROW DedicationX265Spruce11GoodROW DedicationX266Spruce8GoodROW DedicationX267Apple7GoodROW DedicationX268Spruce3GoodOn SiteX269Pine6GoodOn SiteX270Maple15GoodOn SiteX271Maple15GoodOn SiteX272Maple15GoodOn SiteX273Maple15GoodOn SiteX274Maple18GoodOn SiteX275Spruce6GoodOn SiteX276Apple13GoodOn SiteX277Tamarack7GoodOn SiteX278Maple13GoodOn SiteX279Spruce4GoodOn SiteX280Spruce3GoodOn SiteX281Burr Oak6GoodOn SiteX282Spruce3GoodOn SiteX283Maple6GoodOn SiteX284Pine6GoodOn SiteX285Pine6GoodOn SiteX286Pine7GoodOn SiteX287Pine5GoodOn SiteX288Pine5GoodOn SiteX289Pine7GoodOn SiteX290Pine7GoodOn SiteX291Pine6GoodOn SiteX292Pine5GoodOn SiteX293Pine5GoodOn SiteX294Pine6GoodOn SiteX295Pine7GoodOn SiteX296Pine7GoodOn SiteX297Pine4GoodOn SiteX298Pine3GoodOn SiteX299Pine4GoodOn SiteX300Pine4GoodOn SiteX301Pine3GoodOn SiteX302Pine7GoodOn SiteX303Pine7GoodOn SiteX304Pine4GoodOn SiteX305Pine6GoodOn SiteX306Spruce3GoodOn SiteX307Burr Oak8GoodOn SiteX308Maple6GoodOn SiteX309Pine3GoodOn SiteX310Pine4GoodOn SiteX311Cedar3GoodOn SiteX312Pine4GoodOn SiteX313Willow11GoodOn SiteXTREE INVENTORYTREE MITIGATION
STSTST6060
20TH AVENUE (C.S.A.H. NO. 54)TBXSTHYDSSOTVOTVOTVOTVOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEGGGGGGGGGIIIIIII
I3333336033333333STSTSTSSST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SS>>>>>(3) CEOC(4) ULAD(4) CEOC(3) ULAD(4) QUBI(3) TIAM(70) SYVU(70) COSA44445555441717171712345671234567BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2OUTLOT ABUILDING SETBACKOSAKIS STREET
BUILDING SETBACK
IIIIII I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EOF8" W.M. DIPNWLBTM100 YR-HWL100 YR-HWLNWLNWL100 YR-HWLEOF EOFSYMBOLCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEMATURE SIZEPLANTING SIZEROOT CONDITIONTREESCEOC7Celtis occidentalis / Common Hackberry65'HX40'W2.5" CAL.B&BQUBI4Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak65'HX40'W2.5" CAL.B&BTIAM3Tilia americana / American Linden65'HX40'W2.5" CAL.B&BULAD7Ulmus americana 'Delaware #2' / Delaware #2 American Elm65'HX40'W2.5" CAL.B&BSHRUBSCOSA70Cornus sanguinea 'Winter Flame' / Winter Flame Bloodtwig Dogwood10'HX6'W3 GAL.POTSYVU70Syringa vulgaris / Common Lilac10'HX6'W3 GAL.POTPROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.John C. OrtizLicense No:62761Date:dd/mm/yyyyNORTH050100--------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003L2.1LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANL200HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025Contact Utility Service providers for field location of services 72 hours prior to beginning.Coordinate installation with Contractors performing related work.Seed mixture MN DOT Sandy Inslope - (SI) and Southern Boulevard - (SB) as defined in current MNDOT Seeding Manual, orapproved equal. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota (or as specified) origin and certified by the Minnesota Crop ImprovementAssociation (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation.Seed mixture BWSR 35-642, Mesic Prairie Southest and BWSR 32-142, Shallow Rooted BMP Mix as defined in current BWSRSeeding Manual, or approved equal. Native Seeds shall be of Minnesota (or as specified) origin and certified by the Minnesota CropImprovement Association (MCIA). Provide verifying documentation to the Owner 30 days minimum prior to installation.Follow MNDOT Seeding Manual for planting instructions for establishment of native seed and provide coordination for requirederosion prevention and sediment control.Spread topsoil to a minimum depth of (4) inches over all proposed seed and sod areas. Coordinate with grading contractor to ensurefinal design grades are met.Repair any and all areas disturbed beyond the project area. Repair with sod if existing area is manicured turf. Repair with seed ifexisting area is unmowed or unmanicured grass. Rake area to be repaired and add topsoil as defined in Note 7 prior to final sod orseed repair.Planting soil shall consist of 4 parts topsoil to 1 part peat humus, with 3 pounds of commercial fertilizer added per cubic yard. Seeplanting details for depth of planting soil.Place plants according to layout with proper nominal spacing. Plants shown on Plant Schedule are total quantities. For discrepancybetween the number of plants on the Schedule and the number shown on the Drawing, the Drawing shall govern.Plant material shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen Standards and be of hardy stock, free from disease,infestation, damage, and disfiguration. The Landscape Architect or designated representative reserves the right to reject any/all plantmaterial not meeting these standards at the Contractor's cost.Any substitutions of plant genus, species and/or variety, or planting size shall be approved by Landscape Architect of record prior topurchase and installation.Install 4 inch depth of triple-shredded hardwood mulch in Shrub Bed Areas.Reserved.Install a 4-foot diameter triple-shredded hardwood mulch dish around trees not placed within a Shrub or Perennial Planting Bed.Edging is not required, unless noted otherwise.Install 2 to 3 inch (nominal size) grey trap rock to a depth of 4 inches in all planting beds unless noted otherwise. Landscape fabricshall be installed under all areas of rock mulch. Secure all edges and seams of fabric with 6-inch landscape staples.Erosion control blanket (MNDOT 3885). Category 3N, straw 2S, erosion control mat.All existing deciduous/coniferous trees are to be trimmed of dead wood and pruned to a natural uniform shape.Irrigation is required. Irrigation shall be designed by irrigation contractor. Contractor shall submit design plan and all shop drawingsand system components to Landscape Architect for review, prior to purchase and installation. Contractor shall follow all applicablecodes and obtain all necessary permits from local jurisdiction.All plant material shall have a 1-year warranty. The warranty shall begin after the last plant has been installed and the LandscapeArchitect has approved the installation. Landscape contractor is responsible for replacing any and all plant material that dies duringthe warranty period. Landscape contractor shall assume all costs to any replacements. All replacements shall be same species andsizes and equal or better vigor as original installation.2.3.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.18.19.20.GENERAL NOTESLANDSCAPE NOTESFor construction Staking and Surveying services contact Landform at 612.252.9070.1.PLANT SCHEDULESeed mix.BWSR 32-142, Shallow Rooted BMP Mix.Seed at rate of 41.31 lbs/acre.With erosion control mat.Seed mix.BWSR 35-642, Mesic Prairie Southest.Seed at rate of 34.25 lbs/acre.With erosion control mat.LEGENDSeed mix.MNDOT Southern Boulevard - SB, (Formerly-MNDOT 25-131, Low Maintenance Turf).Seed at rate of 160 lbs/acre.With erosion control mat.Seed mix.MN DOT Sandy Inslope - SI, (Formerly-MNDOT 25-121, Sandy GeneralRoadside).Seed at rate of 65 lbs/acre.With erosion control mat.Sod17.17.17.17.17.4.5.5.5.4.4.*Screening to consist of; shrub spacing 6 feet on center, and two rows 5 feet apart and offset in order to make a triangle spacing pattern.
PROJECT NO.FILE NAMELANDFORMc
IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOTVISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDEDREADABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACTTHE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.PROJECTCERTIFICATIONLandform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.DATEISSUE / REVISIONREVIEWCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORYISSUE / REVISION HISTORYFrom Site to Finish105 South Fifth AvenueSuite 513Minneapolis, MN 55401Tel: 612-252-9070Fax: 612-252-9077Web: landform.netDEVELOPERCITY2025
PRE PLAT SUBMITTALETL12 MAY 2025PRELIM
INARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA.Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file atLandform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request.John C. OrtizLicense No:62761Date:dd/mm/yyyy--------1824 BUERKLE RD.WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110TEL: (651)-295-2459ERICKSONPROPERTYLINO LAKES, MINNESOTAHAC25003L7.1LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILSL700HAC003.DWGPRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALMAY 12, 2025TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH SOIL LINE ORFIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT ONE (1) INCH BELOW SOIL LINE. IFROOT FLARE IS NOT APPARENT IT MAY BE COVERED BY BURLAP ORSOIL. ADJUST PLANT AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE DEPTH.VARIESSCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLEPRIOR TO PLANTING2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLEPLANTING SOIL (SEE PLANS) EDGE CONDITION VARIES (SEE PLANS)CUT TOP OF WIRE BASKET 1/3 (MIN) FROM TOP OF BALL. CUT TWINEFROM AROUND TOP 1/3 (MIN) OF ROOTBALL. CUT AND ROLL BACKBURLAP 1/3 (MIN) FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL.16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE(40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.)FLAGGING: ONE (1) PER WIRE1.INSPECT FOR ENCIRCLING ROOTS TO MITIGATE FUTURE STEMGIRDLING. REJECT ANY TREES THAT ARE SEVERELYAFFECTED.2.TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING AREILLUSTRATED AND TO BE UTILIZED ONLY IF NECESSARY.3.MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THEGUARANTEE PERIOD AS DEFINED ON PLANS AND/ORSPECIFICATIONS.NOTES:NO SCALECONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGEXISTING SUBGRADEAREA DUG/TILLEDTO PROMOTE ROOT GROWTH3-5x DIA. OF SOIL BALLEXISTING SOIL LOOSENEDFOUR (4") INCHES SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.MAINTAIN A TWELVE (12") INCH DIAMETER RING AROUND BASE OFTRUNK, CLEAR OF MULCH.DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE.24"12" DIA.DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA.WIRE.8' STEEL STAKE. PLACETWO (2) INCHES FROMROOT BALL.1SUBGRADEAREA DUG/TILLEDTO PROMOTE ROOT GROWTH3-5 x DIA. OF SOIL BALLAREA DUG FOR PLANTING2-3 x DIA. OF SOIL BALLSCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLEPRIOR TO PLANTINGCUT TOP OF WIRE BASKET 1/3 (MIN.) FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL.CUT TWINE FROM AROUND TOP 1/3 (MIN.) OF ROOTBALL. CUTAND ROLL BACK BURLAP 1/3 (MIN.) FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL.2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLEEXISTING SOIL LOOSENEDPLANTING SOIL (SEE PLANS) EDGE CONDITION VARIES1.INSPECT FOR ENCIRCLING ROOTS TO MITIGATEFUTURE STEM GIRDLING. REJECT ANY TREES THATARE SEVERELY AFFECTED.2.TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING AREILLUSTRATED AND TO BE UTILIZED ONLY IFNECESSARY.3.MAINTAIN TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUTTHE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SEE SPECIFICATIONS.FLAGGING: ONE (1) FLAG PER WIREDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE -3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS (TYP.)TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH SOILLINE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT ONE (1) INCH BELOWSOIL LINE. IF ROOT FLARE IS NOT APPARENT IT MAY BECOVERED BY BURLAP OR SOIL. ADJUST PLANT AS NEEDED TOMAINTAIN APPROPRIATE DEPTH.16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE(40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.)TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH NOTES:8' STEEL STAKE.PLACE WITHINTWO (2) INCHESOF ROOT BALL.NO SCALEDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGVARIES PER SPECIES(SEE PLANS)24" MIN.FOUR (4") INCHES MAX.SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(SEE PLANS)2SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLEPRIOR TO PLANTING.PLACE PLANTWHERE SHOWN ONPLANEXISTING SUBGRADEREFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN(S) FORGROUNDCOVER OUTSIDE SHRUB BED(S)FINISHED GRADE1.IF ROOTS ARE PRESENT AROUND THE EDGES OFROOTBALL, UNCOIL OR CUT AS MANY AS POSSIBLEWITHOUT DESTROYING SOIL MASS.2.DIG PLANTING PIT NO DEEPER THAN HEIGHT OF ROOTBALL.NOTES:TOP OF ROOT MASSSHALL BE LEVEL WITHFINISHED GRADEPLANTING SOIL (SEE PLANS)NO SCALESHRUB PLANTINGDIG PLANTING PIT3X WIDEST DIMENSION OF ROOT BALLROOT BALL SITS ON EXISTING ORRECOMPACTED SUBGRADE.FOUR (4) INCH HIGH SOIL BERMCONSTRUCTED AROUND ENTIREROOT BALL. BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOTBALL EDGE.MULCH (SEE PLANS)EDGING (SEE PLANS)X
ERIKSON PROPERTY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Narrative
Erickson Property
Preliminary Plat and Rezone
Prepared for:
Dan Brown
May 12, 2025
SUBMITTED TO
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
PREPARED BY
Landform Professional Services, LLC
105 5th Ave S, Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Hampton Companies
Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Zoning Map Amendment (Rezone) ............................................................................................................... 1
Preliminary Plat ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2
Contact Information ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Erickson Property, Lino Lakes, MN May 12, 2025
HAC25003 1
Introduction
On behalf of Hampton Companies, Landform is pleased to submit this application for a Zoning Map Amendment and
Preliminary Plat to allow the construction of 14 single-family homes at 7590 20th Avenue in Lino Lakes. The current
5.15-acre parcel contains an existing home and numerous outbuildings. The site is surrounded by the Watermark
PUD development by Lennar to the North, East and South. Our plan is to extend the existing street grid planned for
the Watermark development and provide another housing option. We are excited about the improvements proposed
for this site.
Zoning Map Amendment (Rezone)
In order to facilitate the development of this site, and to match the designation found in the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan for Lino Lakes, this parcel will need to be rezoned. The parcel is currently zoned as “R- Rural” and we are
requesting it be zoned to “R-2 – Two-family Residential”. The R-2 zone will allow us to develop this site in the density
range found in the comprehensive plan and the existing I-35E AUAR over the area. The rezone to R-2 also more
closely matches the PUD zoning and lot standards found in the surrounding Watermark development adjacent to our
site.
Preliminary Plat
We are also requesting approval of a preliminary plat for a 14-lot subdivision with 14 new single-family homes and 1
outlot for stormwater management purposes. This plat would be an extension of the Watermark development that
currently surrounds it, but with a different housing look and design. This plat would not be premature as it is easily
served by existing utilities and surrounded by similar density and development.
The site plan shows compliance with the R-2 zoning lot standards, and meets the other applicable landscaping,
subdivision design and screening requirements. Below are some findings and important information about the plat:
1. 14 new single family home lots that comply with the lot and bulk standards found in the proposed R-2 zone that
would be developed at a density of 3.15 units/acre. We are close to the minimum density due to stormwater
management requirements.
i. Gross Area: 5.15 Acres – ROW to 20th Avenue: 0.7 Acres = Net Area: 4.45 Acres
ii. 14 units / Net Area: 4.45 Acres = 3.15 units/acre (3.146)
2. New dedicated ROW in addition to the existing easement for CSAH 45 (20th Avenue) to allow future road
improvements and the extension of the existing trail on the west side. Additionally, this plat will remove a
driveway onto the CSAH 45 (20th Avenue).
3. Stormwater improvements with plans for rainwater reuse irrigation.
4. Additional landscaping that takes advantage of the required number of trees from the Tree Preservation
ordinance, and screening requirements between the rear of homes and the stormwater facilities to reduce noise
and light impacts from CSAH 45 (20th Avenue).
5. A Homeowners Association (HOA) is anticipated to be created for maintenance purposes of development wide
facilities.
Uniformed traffic access to and from CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) for the development is found in the extension of Osakis
Street into the existing Watermark development. The 10th Edition ITE Manual stated that for Single-Family Detached
Housing (210) use there is an average ADT of 9.43 trips per dwelling unit.
Erickson Property, Lino Lakes, MN May 12, 2025
HAC25003 2
The plat shows 14 single-family homes, meaning an ADT of 132.02 for the entire development. However, it is our
experience with homes of this size that the expected ADT overestimates total trips, and we would expect it to be
closer to 115 ADT for the entire development. There is no additional increase expected for this development as a
single-family home use tends to stay consistent on traffic demand and no additional density is planned or possible on
this site within the next ten years.
Additionally, this project will comply with the same findings of the Watermark Traffic Noise assessment that was
conducted in March of 2016 to fulfill the requirements of the I-35E AUAR. This includes meeting the standards for
noise levels found in the study for homes that are along CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). The project would need to meet the
commercial noise standards (NAC-2) during nighttime hours as allowed by Minnesota Rule 7030.0050. This
exemption will be met by following the three following items for all homes built along CSAH 45 (20th Ave) to meet the
NAC-2 standards, instead of the residential standards (NAC-1), for nighttime hours:
1. The building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30
dB(A);
2. the building has year-round climate control; and
3. The building has no areas or accommodations that are intended for outdoor activities.
Finally, the home pads shown on the plan would meet the garage design standards found in the R-2 zone. We
understand that garage design and placement is a key issue for development in Lino Lakes and want to ensure early
that our lots are buildable given the design requirements. While the specific design will take place following the
completion of the plat process, site plan design choices took into account all standards required for minimum garage
size, shape, and location found in the R-2 zoning standards.
Summary
We respectfully request approval of the Zoning Map Amendment and Preliminary Plat to allow the construction of 14
single-family homes at 7590 20th Avenue in Lino Lakes. We asked to be placed on the June 11th Planning
Commission and July 14th City Council Meeting as found on the 2025 Application Deadline & Meeting schedule. We
are excited to work with you on this project.
Contact Information
This document was prepared by:
Zeke Peters, AICP-C
Landform
105 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 513
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Eric Luth, P.E. at eluth@landform.net or
612.638.0261.
May 6, 2025 HGTS Project Number: 25-0201
Mr. Dan Brown
Hampton Companies
1824 Buerkle Rd.
White Bear Lake MN 55110
Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Proposed Residential Development,
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Brown:
We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed residential
development in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. A brief summary of our results and recommendations
is presented below. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations
follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report.
Five (5) soil borings were completed for this project that encountered about 1 to 7 feet of
topsoil, topsoil/Fill and Fill that was underlain by native glacial till soils that extended to the
termination depths of the borings. Groundwater was encountered in two of the soil borings at
depths of about 7 to 8 feet below the ground surface.
The vegetation, topsoil and Fill are not suitable for foundation support and some corrections
will be needed to remove these materials from within the proposed building and oversize
areas and replace them with suitable compacted engineered fill. It is our opinion that the
underlying native glacial till soils are suitable for foundation support.
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 612-729-2959.
Sincerely,
Haugo GeoTechnical Services
Nic Alfonso, G.I.T. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E.
Project Geologist Senior Engineer
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT
PROJECT:
Proposed Residential Development
7590 20th Avenue
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55038
PREPARED FOR:
Hampton Companies
1824 Buerkle Rd.
White Bear Lake MN 55110
PREPARED BY:
Haugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407
Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 25-0201
May 6, 2025
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Paul Gionfriddo, P.E.
Senior Engineer
License Number: 23093
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Description 1
1.2 Purpose 1
1.3 Site Description 1
1.4 Scope of Services 1
1.5 Documents Provided 1
1.6 Locations and Elevations 2
2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 2
3.0 RESULTS 3
3.1 Soil Conditions 3
3.2 Groundwater 3
3.3 Laboratory Testing 4
3.4 OSHA Soil Classification 4
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4
4.1 Proposed Construction 4
4.2 Discussion 5
4.3 Site Grading Recommendations 6
4.4 Dewatering 7
4.5 Interior Slabs 8
4.6 Below Grade Walls 8
4.7 Retaining Walls 9
4.8 Exterior Slabs 9
4.9 Site Grading and Drainage 10
4.10 Utilities 10
4.11 Bituminous Pavements Recommendations 11
4.12 Materials and Compaction 11
5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 12
5.1 Excavation 12
5.2 Observations 12
5.3 Backfill and Fills 12
5.4 Testing 12
5.5 Winter Construction 13
6.0 PROCEDURES 13
6.1 Soil Classification 13
6.2 Groundwater Observations 13
7.0 GENERAL 13
7.1 Subsurface Variations 13
7.2 Review of Design 14
7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 14
7.4 Use of Report 14
7.5 Level of Care 14
APPENDIX
Boring Location Sketch, Figure 1
Soil Boring Logs, SB-101 thru SB-105
Descriptive Terminology
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
Hampton Companies is proposing to construct a residential development in Lino Lakes,
Minnesota and retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services (HGTS) to perform a geotechnical
exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions to support the proposed
development.
We understand the project will consist of constructing 18 homes along with the associated
underground utilities and street(s).
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for foundation design and
construction.
1.3 Site Description
The project site is located at 7590 20th Avenue in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The project site is an
approximate 6-acre residential property that contained several structures including a house,
garage and barn. Areas not occupied by the structures were landscaped or lawn covered.
The site topography was relatively flat with the elevations at the soil boring locations ranging
from about 903 to 910 feet above mean sea level (MSL).
1.4 Scope of Services
Our services were performed as requested and authorized by Hampton Companies. Our
services were performed under the terms of our General Conditions and were limited to the
following tasks:
Completing five (5) standard penetration test soil borings and extending to nominal
depths of 20 feet.
Sealing the boring in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health requirements.
Visually/manually classifying samples recovered from the soil boring.
Performing laboratory tests on selected samples.
Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of
groundwater level measurements.
Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions and
providing recommendations for foundation design and construction.
1.5 Documents Provided
We were provided a concept plan prepared by Landform and dated March 21, 2025. The plan
showed the proposed house lots and street along with site information and design criteria
information.
2
We were provided two soil boring exhibits prepared by Landform and dated April 4, 2025
which showed a layout of the proposed development with the proposed soil boring locations.
Other than these provided documents, specific architectural, structural or civil documents
were not provided at the time of this assessment.
1.6 Locations and Elevations
The soil boring locations were selected and staked in the field by Hampton Companies and/or
Landform. The approximate locations of the soil borings are shown on Figure 1, “Soil Boring
Location Sketch,” in the Appendix. The sketch was prepared by HGTS using the provided soil
boring exhibit as a base.
Ground surface elevations at the soil boring locations were provided by Landform.
2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES
The standard penetration test borings were advanced on April 16, 2025 by HGTS with a rotary
drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples
were obtained from the borings, using the split-barrel sampling procedures in general
accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a 2-inch
O.D. split-barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches.
The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch
penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results
of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring logs. The samples were sealed in
containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification.
A field log of each boring was prepared by HGTS. The logs contain visual classifications of the
soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the
subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs
included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include
modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples.
The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and
classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil
boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency
based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, “blows per foot”) and groundwater
observations.
The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The
depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely
transitions; variations can occur beyond the location of the borings.
3
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Soil Conditions
At the surface, the soil borings encountered about 1 to 4 ½ feet of topsoil or topsoil/Fill that
consisted of sandy lean clay that was black in color and contained traces of grass and roots.
Piece(s) of concrete were noted in the topsoil/Fill at boring SB-3.
Below the topsoil, borings SB-101, SB-102 and SB-105 encountered existing Fill that extended
to depths ranging from about 4 ½ to 7 feet below the ground surface. The Fill consisted of
sandy lean clay and silty clayey sand that was black, greyish brown, dark brown and brown
in color. Some pieces of wood were noted in the Fill at boring SB-101.
Penetration resistance values (N-Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs,
within the Fill ranged from 2 to 8 bpf. These values indicate the Fill had a soft to medium
consistency.
Below the topsoil and Fill, the soil borings encountered native glacial till soils that extended
to the termination depths of the borings. The glacial till soils consisted of; sandy lean clay, lean
clay, silty sand and poorly graded sand with silt that was brown or grey in color.
N-Values within the lean clay and sandy lean clay soils ranged from 4 to 13 bpf indicating a
rather soft to stiff consistency.
N-Values within the silty sand and poorly graded sand with silt soils ranged from 5 to 11 bpf
indicating a loose to medium dense relative density.
3.2 Groundwater
Groundwater was encountered in borings SB-103 and SB-105 while drilling and sampling at
about 8 and 7 feet below the ground surface corresponding to elevations of about 897 and 903,
respectively. Groundwater was not encountered in borings SB-101, SB-102 or SB-104. The
observed water levels are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of Groundwater Levels
Boring
Number
Measured Surface
Elevation (feet)
Estimated Depth to
Groundwater
(feet)*
Estimated
Groundwater
Elevation (feet)*
SB-101 908.7 NE -
SB-102 903.6 NE -
SB-103 904.8 8 897
SB-104 903.1 NE -
SB-105 910.1 7 903
* = Depths and elevations were rounded to the nearest ½ foot. NE = Not Encountered
Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water
level observations was relatively short. Given the cohesive nature of the soils encountered in
the borings it is possible there was insufficient time for groundwater to seep into the borings
and rise to its hydrostatic level. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be
4
required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the
groundwater levels should be expected.
3.3 Laboratory Testing
Laboratory moisture content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the
soil borings. Laboratory soil moisture contents ranged from about 11 to 20 percent indicating
that the soils were likely above their assumed optimum moisture content based on the
standard Proctor test. Laboratory tests results are summarized in Table 2 and are shown on
the boring logs adjacent to the samples tested.
Table 2. Summary of Laboratory Tests
Boring Number Sample
Number
Depth
(feet)
Moisture Content
(%) *
SB-101 SS-4 7 ½ 17 ½
SB-102 SS-13 10 18 ½
SB-103 SS-19 5 14 ½
SB-104 SS-26 2 ½ 11
SB-104 SS-29 10 19 ½
SB-105 SS-35 5 20
*Moisture content values rounded to the nearest ½ percent.
3.4 OSHA Soil Classification
The soils encountered in the borings consisted of lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty sand and
poorly graded sand with silt corresponding to the ASTM Classifications of CL, SM and SP-
SM. Soils classified as CL will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines, while soils classified as
SM and SP-SM will generally be Type C soils under OSHA guidelines.
An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field.
Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P,
“Excavations and Trenches.” This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of
the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements.
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Proposed Construction
We understand that the project will consist of preparing lots and house pads for 18 homes
along with the associated street(s) and underground utilities. We were not provided specific
architectural, structural or civil construction plans but we assume the homes will include one
or two stories above grade and be slab on grade structures but could include walkout, lookout
or full basements. We anticipate below grade construction consisting of cast-in-place concrete
foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. The above grade construction is
assumed to consist of wood framing, a pitched roof and asphalt shingles.
5
Based on the assumed construction we estimate wall loadings will range from about 2 to 3
kips (2,000 to 3,000 pounds) per lineal foot and column loads, if any, will be on the order of 75
kips (75,000 pounds).
We anticipate the homes will be constructed at or near existing site grades so that cuts or fill
for permanent grade changes will generally be on the order of 5 feet or less.
We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. If the proposed loads exceed
these values or if the design or location of the proposed development changes, we should be
informed. Additional analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary.
4.2 Discussion
Structures existed on the project site that we anticipate will be removed/demolished to make
way for the proposed development. We recommend that all remnants of the structures
including footings, floor slabs, foundation walls, exterior flatwork and underground utilities
be removed from within the proposed building and oversize areas.
The vegetation and topsoil are not suitable for foundation, roadway or utility support and will
need to be removed from below the building pads, pavements, utilities and oversize areas and
replaced with suitable competed engineered fill, as needed, to attain design grades.
The origin of the Fill encountered in borings SB-101, SB-102 and SB-105 is unknown and we
are not aware of any documentation regarding its placement or compaction. The concern with
undocumented Fill is the potential for unsuitable materials to be buried within it that can settle
unfavorably due to the structural loads associated with the new buildings. Some pieces of
wood were noted in the Fill at boring SB-1. Additionally, portions of the Fill were black in
color which can be indicative of organic material within the Fill. Organic soils or soil
containing organic matter can be compressible and are not suitable for foundation support.
For these reasons we do not recommend supporting the new foundations on the Fill and
recommend it be removed and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill.
It is our opinion that the underlying native glacial till soils are generally suitable for
foundation support. Some softer clays were encountered at boring SB-5 that extended to about
7 feet below the ground surface. Soft clays will need to be removed and replaced with suitable
compacted engineered fill or excavated dried and recompacted.
Groundwater was encountered in borings SB-103 and SB-105 while drilling and sampling at
about 8 and 7 feet below the ground surface corresponding to elevations of about 897 and 903,
respectively. Depending on final site and building grades, there is the potential that
groundwater could be encountered during soil corrections and/or foundation construction
and dewatering could be required.
The following sections provide recommendations for foundation design and construction.
6
4.3 Site Grading Recommendations
Excavation We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil, Fill and any soft or otherwise
unsuitable soils, if encountered, be removed from below the proposed building, roadway,
utility and oversize areas. Likewise, we recommend that all remnants of the structures
including footings, floor slabs, foundation walls, exterior flatwork and underground utilities
be removed from within the proposed building, roadway, utility and oversize areas. Table 3
summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the soil boring locations. Excavation depths
may vary and could be deeper.
Table 3. Anticipated Excavation Depths
Boring
Number
Measured
Surface
Elevation
(feet)
Anticipated
Excavation
Depth (feet)*
Anticipated
Excavation
Elevation (feet)*
Approximate
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)*
SB-101 908.7 7 901 ½ NE
SB-102 903.6 7 896 ½ NE
SB-103 904.8 4 ½ 900 ½ 897
SB-104 903.1 1 902 NE
SB-105 910.1 7 903 903
* = Excavation depths and elevations were rounded to nearest ½ foot. NE = Not Encountered
Oversizing In areas where the excavations for soil corrections extend below the proposed
footing elevations, the excavations require oversizing. We recommend the perimeter of the
excavation be extended a foot outside the proposed footprint for every foot below footing
grade (1H:1V oversizing). The purpose of the oversizing is to provide lateral support of the
foundation.
Fill Material Additional fill required to attain design grades can consist of any mineral soil
provided it is free of debris, organic soil and any soft or otherwise unsuitable materials. Except
we recommend that fill or backfill placed in wet excavations or within 2 feet of the
groundwater table, if encountered, consist of “clean coarse sand” with less than 5 percent
passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve.
The on-site native glacial till soils appear to be suitable for reuse as structural fill or backfill
provided it is free of debris, organic soils or other unsuitable materials. Laboratory soil
moisture contents ranged from about 11 to 20 percent indicating that the soils were likely
above their assumed optimum moisture content based on the standard Proctor test. Soils that
will be excavated and reused as fill and backfill will likely require some moisture conditioning
(drying) to achieve the recommended compaction levels.
Topsoil organic soils or other soils that are black in color are not suitable for reuse as structural
fill or backfill.
Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain site grades be compacted to a
minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified
as SP or SP-SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture
content as determined by the standard Proctor. Other fill soils should be placed within 3
7
percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as
determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted
with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode.
In areas where fill depths will exceed 10 feet, if any, we recommend that compaction levels be
increased to a minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor density. Even with the increased
compaction levels a construction delay may be required to allow for post settlement of the fill
mass.
Fill and backfill placed on slopes, if any, must be “benched” into the underlying suitable soils
to reduce the potential for slip places to develop between the fill and underlying soil. We
recommend “benching” or excavating into the slope at 5 feet vertical intervals to key the fill
into the slope. We recommend each bench be a minimum of 10 feet wide.
Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the
exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the
slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions.
Foundation elements in unheated areas (i.e., deck or porch footings) should bear at least 5 feet
below exterior grade for frost protection.
We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native
glacial till soils. With the building pads prepared as recommended, it is our opinion the
footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 2,000 pounds per square
foot (psf).
We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and
½ inch, respectively, across a 30-foot span.
4.4 Dewatering
Groundwater was encountered in borings SB-103 and SB-105 while drilling and sampling at
about 8 and 7 feet below the ground surface corresponding to elevations of about 897 and 903,
respectively. Depending on final site and building grades, there is the potential that
groundwater could be encountered during soil corrections and/or foundation construction
and dewatering could be required.
In the event dewatering is required, we recommend the groundwater level be temporarily
lowered to a minimum of 2 feet below the lowest anticipated excavation elevation to allow for
construction. In sand soils, we do not recommend attempting to dewater from within the
excavation. Upward seepage will loosen and disturb the excavation, resulting in a “quick
condition.” Rather, we recommend groundwater to be drawn down below the anticipated
excavation bottom.
If dewatering is required, it may be appropriate for a dewatering contractor to review the soil
boring logs, develop a dewatering plan and evaluate the impact of dewatering on adjacent
structures.
8
4.5 Interior Slabs
The anticipated floor subgrade will consist of compacted clayey engineered fill or clayey
native glacial till soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 50 pounds per
square inch per inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor.
If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we
recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab.
Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to
reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor
retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we
recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use
and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty.
We recommend following all state and local building codes with regards to a radon mitigation
plan beneath interior slabs.
4.6 Below Grade Walls
We recommend general waterproofing of the below grade walls. We recommend either
placing drainage composite against the backs of the exterior walls or backfilling adjacent to
the walls with sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the #40 sieve
and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. The sand backfill
should be placed within 2 feet horizontally of the wall. We recommend the balance of the
backfill for the walls consist of sand however the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the
particles by weight passing the #200 sieve.
We recommend installing drain tile behind the below grade walls, adjacent to the wall footing
and below the slab elevation. Preferably the drain tile should consist of perforated pipe
embedded in gravel. A geotextile filter fabric should encase the pipe and gravel. The drain
tile should be routed to a storm sewer, sump pump or other suitable disposal site.
Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the
surrounding soil transmitted to them. Active earth pressures can be used to design the below
grade walls if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If wall rotation cannot be tolerated, then
below grade wall design should be based on at-rest earth pressures. It is our opinion that the
estimated soil parameters presented in Table 4 can be used for below grade wall design. These
estimated parameters are based on the assumptions that the walls are drained, there are no
surcharge loads within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall and the backfill is
level.
9
Table 4. Estimated Soil Parameters
Soil Type
Estimated
Unit
Weight
(pcf)
Estimated
Friction
Angle
(degrees)
At-Rest
Pressure
(pcf)
Active
Soil
Pressure
(pcf)
Passive Soil
Pressure
(pcf)
Sand
(SP & SP-SM) 120 32 55 35 390
Other Soils
(CL, SM, SC-SM,
SC)
135 28 70 50 375
Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall
footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a
sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety.
4.7 Retaining Walls
We are not aware of any retaining walls proposed for this project and were not provided any
information regarding any proposed retaining walls. Retaining wall designers/installers
should be aware that soil borings for any retaining walls were not completed as part of this
evaluation. Because of that, additional geotechnical explorations (soil borings) could be
required to determine and evaluate the suitability and/or stability of site soil conditions to
support their design(s). Retaining wall designers and/or installers will be solely responsible
to conduct additional geotechnical evaluation(s) as needed.
In addition, HGTS does not practice in retaining wall design. Retaining wall designers will be
solely responsible for retaining wall design and construction.
4.8 Exterior Slabs
Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by clayey soils which are considered to be moderately
to highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, frost heave may occur.
This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to
help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost-susceptible soils below the slabs
down to bottom of footing grades and replace them with non-frost-susceptible backfill
consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number
200 sieve.
If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non-free draining granular
soil, we recommend a drain tile be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to
collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The bottom of the
excavation should be graded away from the building.
If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost-susceptible soils are not sloped, abrupt
transitions between the frost-susceptible and non-frost-susceptible backfill will exist along
which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist
between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the
slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address
10
this issue, we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils at a
minimum 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) gradient.
An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded
polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs.
The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to
twelve inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during
construction.
Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A
void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to
allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs.
4.9 Site Grading and Drainage
We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed homes.
We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the
building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition, we recommend downspouts
with long splash blocks or extensions.
We recommend the lowest floor grades be constructed to meet City of Lino Lakes
requirements with respect to groundwater separation distances. In the absence of city
requirements, we recommend maintaining at least a 4-foot separation between the lowest floor
slab and the observed groundwater levels and at least a 2-foot separation between the lowest
floor slab and the 100-year flood level of nearby wetlands, storm water ponds or other surface
water features.
4.10 Utilities
We anticipate that new utilities will be installed as part of this project. We further anticipate
that new utilities will bear at depths ranging from about 7 to 10 feet below the ground surface.
At these depths, we anticipate that the pipes will bear on compacted engineered fill or native
glacial till soils, which in our opinion are suitable for pipe support. We recommend removing
all vegetation, topsoil, Fill and any soft or otherwise unsuitable soils, if any, beneath utilities
prior to placement.
We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend
trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and
pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100
percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas, we recommend a
minimum compaction of 90 percent.
Groundwater was encountered in two of the soil borings at about 7 to 8 feet below the ground
surface. We anticipate that groundwater could be encountered during utility construction and
dewatering could be required. See Section 4.4 for dewatering considerations.
11
4.11 Bituminous Pavements Recommendations
General The City of Lino Lakes may have standard plates that dictate pavement design and
if so, we recommend that the pavements be designed and constructed in accordance with the
City of Lino Lakes standard plates. The following paragraphs provide general pavement
recommendations in the absence of city standard plates.
Traffic We were not provided any information regarding traffic volumes, such as Average
Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) or vehicle distribution. We anticipate the streets will be used
predominantly by automobiles, light trucks, school busses, garbage trucks and delivery vans
(FEDEX, UPS etc.). Based on the anticipated number of homes in the development and
assumed traffic types we estimate the roadways will be subjected to Equivalent Single Axle
Loads (ESAL’s) less than 50,000 over a 20-year design life. This does not account for any future
growth.
Subgrade Preparation We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil and any soft or
otherwise unsuitable materials from beneath the pavement subgrade. Prior to placing the
aggregate base, we recommend compacting and/or test rolling the subgrade soils to identify
soft, weak, loose, or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts.
Backfill to attain pavement subgrade elevations can consist of any mineral soil provided it is
free of organic material or other deleterious materials. We recommend placing and
compacting fill and/or backfill as described in Section 4.3 except in paved areas where the
upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its
standard Proctor maximum dry density.
R-Value R-Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. Below the topsoil the soils
encountered in the borings consisted predominantly of clayey soils corresponding to the
ASTM Classification of CL. It is our opinion an assumed R-Value of 12 can be used for
pavement design.
Pavement Section Based on an estimated R-value of 12 and a maximum of 50,000 ESAL’s we
recommend pavement section consisting of a minimum of 3 ½ inches of bituminous (1 ½
inches of wear course and 2 inches of base course) underlain by a minimum of 8 inches of
aggregate base.
If a heavy-duty section is required, we minimum of 4 inches of bituminous (1 ½ inches of wear
course and 2 inches of base course) underlain by a minimum of 9 inches of aggregate base.
4.12 Materials and Compaction
We recommend specifying aggregate base meeting MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. We
recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor.
We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirements of
MN/DOT specification 2360. We recommend the bituminous pavements be compacted to at
least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical density.
12
We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,500
psi, and a modulus of rupture of at least 600 psi. We recommend Type I cement meeting the
requirements of ASTM C150. We recommend specifying 5 to 7 percent entrained air for
exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze-thaw deterioration. We also recommend
using a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicers.
5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
5.1 Excavation
The soils encountered in the borings consisted of lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty sand and
poorly graded sand with silt corresponding to the ASTM Classifications of CL, SM and SP-
SM. Soils classified as CL will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines, while soils classified as
SM and SP-SM will generally be Type C soils under OSHA guidelines.
Temporary excavations in Type B soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot
horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Temporary excavations in Type C soils
should be constructed at a minimum of 1 ½ foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within
excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site
constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions, then temporary
shoring may be required.
5.2 Observations
A geotechnical engineer or a qualified engineering technician should observe the excavation
subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and
adequate to support the proposed construction.
5.3 Backfill and Fills
The on-site soils appear to be above their assumed optimum soil moisture content. If these
soils will be used or reused as structural fill or backfill, some drying of the soils could be
required to meet the recommend compaction levels. We recommend moisture conditioning
all soils that will be used as fill or backfill in accordance with Section 4.3 above. We recommend
that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of
the compactor and materials used.
5.4 Testing
We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed for the proposed foundations. Samples
of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for
evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum
dry density (Standard Proctor).
13
5.5 Winter Construction
If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and
ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of
fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill.
Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or
ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from
freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate
below the footings.
6.0 PROCEDURES
6.1 Soil Classification
The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in
general accordance with ASTM D 2488, “Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-
Manual Procedure).” Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were
returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples
will be retained for a period of 30 days.
6.2 Groundwater Observations
Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the boring, the hole was checked
for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole
the hole was once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted.
7.0 GENERAL
7.1 Subsurface Variations
The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from
a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the boring, the nature of
which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed, or
construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be
made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of
any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested
that a contingency be provided for this purpose.
It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during
construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected
the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly
interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This
will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings
and will provide continuity of professional responsibility.
14
7.2 Review of Design
This report is based on the design of the proposed structures as related to us for preparation
of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the
design and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes have
affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been
correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications.
7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations
We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated
on the boring log. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation
was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall,
flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident
at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction
planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations.
7.4 Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of Hampton Companies and their design team to use to
design the proposed structures and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our
written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties
regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for
other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or
purposes contact us.
7.5 Level of Care
Haugo GeoTechnical Services has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No
warranty expressed or implied is made.
APPENDIX
Haugo GeoTechnical
Services, LLC
2825 Cedar Avenue S.
Minneapolis, MN 55407
Figure #: 1
Drawn By: NA
Date: 4/28/25
Scale: None
Project #: 25-0201
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Erickson Property
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legend
Approximate Soil Boring Location Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed.
This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
SB-102 SB-103
SB-101
SB-104
SB-105
Sandy Lean Clay, trace Grass and Roots, Black, Wet (Topsoil/Fill)
Sandy Lean Clay, trace Wood, Black, Gray and Brown, Wet (Fill)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Brown to Greyish Brown,
Wet, Medium (Glacial Till)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey, Wet, Medium (Glacial
Till)
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet.
AU
1
SS
2
SS
3
SS
4
SS
5
SS
6
SS
7
SS
8
2-3-4
(7)
1-2-3
(5)
2-3-4
(7)
2-3-5
(8)
2-3-4
(7)
3-4-4
(8)
2-3-5
(8)
17.5
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 908.7 ft
LOGGED BY MS/MD
DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS 750-2 GROUND WATER LEVELS:
CHECKED BY PG
DATE STARTED 4/16/25 COMPLETED 4/16/25
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered
HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches
DEPTH(ft)0
5
10
15
20 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
Moisture Content(%) FINES CONTENT (%)
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
PL LLMC
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-101
CLIENT Hampton Companies
PROJECT NUMBER 25-0201
PROJECT NAME Erickson Property
PROJECT LOCATION Lino Lakes, MN
GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/6/25 12:32 - C:\USERS\ALICE HAUGO\HGTS DROPBOX\LAB HAUGO\HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES\GINT PROJECT BACKUP\PROJECTS\25-0201 BORING LOG DRAFTS.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Ave South
Minneapolis, MN, 55407
Telephone: 612-729-2959
Fax: 763-445-2238
Sandy Lean Clay, trace Grass and Roots, Black, Wet (Topsoil/Fill)
Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Brownish Grey with Trace Black,
Wet (Fill)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey, Wet, Rather Stiff to
Rather Soft (Glacial Till)
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet.
AU
9
SS
10
SS
11
SS
12
SS
13
SS
14
SS
15
SS
16
3-4-2
(6)
3-4-4
(8)
3-4-6
(10)
2-2-3
(5)
1-2-3
(5)
1-2-2
(4)
1-2-4
(6)
18.5
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 903.6 ft
LOGGED BY MS/MD
DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS 750-2 GROUND WATER LEVELS:
CHECKED BY PG
DATE STARTED 4/16/25 COMPLETED 4/16/25
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered
HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches
DEPTH(ft)0
5
10
15
20 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
Moisture Content(%) FINES CONTENT (%)
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
PL LLMC
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-102
CLIENT Hampton Companies
PROJECT NUMBER 25-0201
PROJECT NAME Erickson Property
PROJECT LOCATION Lino Lakes, MN
GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/6/25 12:32 - C:\USERS\ALICE HAUGO\HGTS DROPBOX\LAB HAUGO\HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES\GINT PROJECT BACKUP\PROJECTS\25-0201 BORING LOG DRAFTS.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Ave South
Minneapolis, MN, 55407
Telephone: 612-729-2959
Fax: 763-445-2238
Sandy Lean Clay, Black, Wet (Topsoil/Fill)
Pieces of Concrete Noted at about 2.5 Ft
(SM) Silty Sand with Gravel, Grey, Moist to Wet, Loose (Glacial
Till)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey with Rust Staining, Wet,
Medium (Glacial Till)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey, Wet, Medium to Rather
Soft (Glacial Till)
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet.
AU
17
SS
18
SS
19
SS
20
SS
21
SS
22
SS
23
SS
24
2-2-2
(4)
4-3-2
(5)
2-3-5
(8)
3-3-5
(8)
1-3-3
(6)
1-3-3
(6)
1-2-3
(5)
14.5
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 904.8 ft
LOGGED BY MS/MD
DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS 750-2 GROUND WATER LEVELS:
CHECKED BY PG
DATE STARTED 4/16/25 COMPLETED 4/16/25
AT TIME OF DRILLING 8.00 ft / Elev 896.80 ft
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---
HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches
DEPTH(ft)0
5
10
15
20 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
Moisture Content(%) FINES CONTENT (%)
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
PL LLMC
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-103
CLIENT Hampton Companies
PROJECT NUMBER 25-0201
PROJECT NAME Erickson Property
PROJECT LOCATION Lino Lakes, MN
GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/6/25 12:32 - C:\USERS\ALICE HAUGO\HGTS DROPBOX\LAB HAUGO\HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES\GINT PROJECT BACKUP\PROJECTS\25-0201 BORING LOG DRAFTS.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Ave South
Minneapolis, MN, 55407
Telephone: 612-729-2959
Fax: 763-445-2238
Sandy Lean Clay, Black, Wet (Topsoil)
(CL) Lean Clay, Light Grey, Wet, Rather Stiff (Glacial Till)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey, Wet, Rather Soft to
Rather Stiff (Glacial Till)
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet.
AU
25
SS
26
SS
27
SS
28
SS
29
SS
30
SS
31
SS
32
1-3-6
(9)
5-6-7
(13)
4-5-5
(10)
2-4-5
(9)
2-3-3
(6)
1-2-3
(5)
1-3-3
(6)
11
19.5
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 903.1 ft
LOGGED BY MS/MD
DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS 750-2 GROUND WATER LEVELS:
CHECKED BY PG
DATE STARTED 4/16/25 COMPLETED 4/16/25
AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered
AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered
HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches
DEPTH(ft)0
5
10
15
20 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
Moisture Content(%) FINES CONTENT (%)
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
PL LLMC
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-104
CLIENT Hampton Companies
PROJECT NUMBER 25-0201
PROJECT NAME Erickson Property
PROJECT LOCATION Lino Lakes, MN
GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/6/25 12:32 - C:\USERS\ALICE HAUGO\HGTS DROPBOX\LAB HAUGO\HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES\GINT PROJECT BACKUP\PROJECTS\25-0201 BORING LOG DRAFTS.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Ave South
Minneapolis, MN, 55407
Telephone: 612-729-2959
Fax: 763-445-2238
Sandy Lean Clay, Black, Wet (Topsoil)
Silty Clayey Sand, Dark Brown, Wet to Waterbearing (Fill)
(CL) Lean Clay, trace Roots, White to Light Grey, Wet, Rather Soft
(Glacial Till)
(SP-SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, Fine Grained, Brown,
Waterbearing, Loose to Medium Dense (Glacial Till)
(CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, Grey, Wet, Rather Soft to
Medium (Glacial Till)
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet.
AU
33
SS
34
SS
35
SS
36
SS
37
SS
38
SS
39
SS
40
0-1-1
(2)
0-2-3
(5)
1-2-4
(6)
0-4-7
(11)
3-6-6
(12)
2-4-5
(9)
2-4-4
(8)
20
NOTES
GROUND ELEVATION 910.1 ft
LOGGED BY MS/MD
DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon
DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS 750-2 GROUND WATER LEVELS:
CHECKED BY PG
DATE STARTED 4/16/25 COMPLETED 4/16/25
AT TIME OF DRILLING 7.00 ft / Elev 903.10 ft
AT END OF DRILLING ---
AFTER DRILLING ---
HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches
DEPTH(ft)0
5
10
15
20 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
Moisture Content(%) FINES CONTENT (%)
20 40 60 80
20 40 60 80
PL LLMC
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NUMBER SB-105
CLIENT Hampton Companies
PROJECT NUMBER 25-0201
PROJECT NAME Erickson Property
PROJECT LOCATION Lino Lakes, MN
GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/6/25 12:32 - C:\USERS\ALICE HAUGO\HGTS DROPBOX\LAB HAUGO\HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES\GINT PROJECT BACKUP\PROJECTS\25-0201 BORING LOG DRAFTS.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services
2825 Cedar Ave South
Minneapolis, MN, 55407
Telephone: 612-729-2959
Fax: 763-445-2238