HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-02-25 - Council Work Session Agenda
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, June 2, 2025
Mayor Rafferty, Councilmembers Cavegn, Lyden, Ruhland and Stoesz
Interim City Administrator: Dave Pecchia
COUNCIL WORK SESSION 6:00 P.M.
Community Room (Not televised) | No Public Comment allowed per the Rules of Decorum
Item # Topic Time (Estimated)
1. Call to Order and Roll Call 6:00 PM
2. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 6:00 PM
3. 2024 Audit Presentation, Kelly Horn 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM
4. Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat, Katie Larsen 7:00 PM –7:10 PM
5. Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat, Katie Larsen 7:10 PM – 7:20 PM
6. Nelson Rehbein PUD Concept Plan, Katie Larsen 7:20 PM – 8:45 PM
7. Water & Sewer JPA w/White Bear Township, Michael Grochala 8:45 PM – 8:55 PM
8. PW Building, Construction Manager Update, Michael Grochala 8:55 PM – 9:05 PM
9. VLAWMO, JPA Amendment, Michael Grochala 9:05 PM – 9:15 PM
10. City Council Rules of Decorum, Roberta Colotti 9:15 PM – 9:30 PM
11. Municipal Cannabis Store, Dave Pecchia 9:30 PM – 9:45 PM
12. Administration Update, Dave Pecchia 9:45 PM – 9:55 PM
13. Notices and Communications, City Council 9:55 PM – 10:00 PM
ADJOURNMENT
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Kelly Horn, Interim Finance Director
WORK SESSION DATE: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: 2024 Audit Report
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
Andy Hering of Redpath and Company will be in attendance to provide an overview of the City’s
2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, present the auditor’s management analysis, and
answer any questions you may have with regard to the financial condition of the City.
The 2024 audit fieldwork was completed in April. The auditors review all financial transactions
and the financial reports of the City over the previous year for their fairness in presentation and
for full disclosure of all material aspects of the City’s financial condition. This review is
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. The auditors concluded that the City’s financial
statements presented fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City as of
December 31, 2024.
The auditors also issue their reports on the City’s legal compliance with certain laws,
regulations, contracts, etc., our internal control structure, and management issues.
It should be noted that the City has received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States
and Canada for its 2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. The city has received this
award each year since 1995. We believe that the report issued for 2024 continues to uphold
the high standards of reporting excellence that this prestigious award represents.
The presentation at the work session will be comprehensive and is intended to provide the
opportunity for council members to ask any questions or make comments about the audit
report and the state of city finances.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
Council will consider acceptance of the 2024 Audit Report at the June 9, 2025 City Council
Meeting.
2
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
2. 2024 Governance Letter
3. 2024 Internal Control Report
4. 2024 Legal Compliance Report
ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
OF THE
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
December 31, 2024
Prepared By: Finance Department
- This page intentionally left blank -
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Reference No.
Letter of Transmittal 3
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting 7
Organization Chart 9
Principal City Officials 11
Independent Auditor's Report 15
Management's Discussion and Analysis 19
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-Wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position Statement 1 33
Statement of Activities Statement 2 34
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds Statement 3 36
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds
To the Statement of Net Position Statement 4 39
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -
Governmental Funds Statement 5 40
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
In Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement 6 42
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement 7 43
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position -
Proprietary Funds Statement 8 44
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds Statement 9 45
Notes to Financial Statements 47
Required Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund Statement 10 88
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - The Rookery Activity Center Statement 11 94
Schedule of Changes in the Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios Statement 12 95
Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability -
General Employees Retirement Fund Statement 13 96
Schedule of Pension Contributions -
General Employees Retirement Fund Statement 14 97
Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability -
Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Statement 15 98
Schedule of Pension Contributions -
Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Statement 16 99
Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios -
Lino Lakes Public Safety Department - Fire Division Statement 17 100
Schedule of Contributions -
Lino Lakes Public Safety Department - Fire Division Statement 18 102
Notes to RSI 103
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
FINANCIAL SECTION
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Reference No.
Combining and Individual Nonmajor Fund Financial Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Statement 19 110
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -
Nonmajor Governmental Funds Statement 20 111
Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Statement 21 114
Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Statement 22 116
Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Debt Service Funds Statement 23 120
Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance - Nonmajor Debt Service Funds Statement 24 122
Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Capital Project Funds Statement 25 127
Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance - Nonmajor Capital Project Funds Statement 26 130
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component Table 1 136
Changes in Net Position Table 2 138
Fund Balances, Governmental Funds Table 3 142
Changes in Fund Balances, Governmental Funds Table 4 144
Revenue Capacity:
Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property Table 5 146
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Capacity Rates Table 6 147
Principal Property Taxpayers Table 7 149
Property Tax Levies and Collections Table 8 150
Debt Capacity:
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Table 9 152
Ratios of Net General Bonded Debt Table 10 154
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt Table 11 156
Legal Debt Margin Information Table 12 157
Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics Table 13 158
Principal Employers Table 14 159
Operating Information:
Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees By Function/Program Table 15 160
Operating Indicators by Function/Program Table 16 162
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program Table 17 164
STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
1
- This page intentionally left blank -
2
600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Phone: 651-982-2400 ∙ Fax: 651-982-2499
May 22, 2025
Honorable Mayor
Members of the City Council
Citizens of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Minnesota State law requires that cities over 2,500 population publish within six months of the close of
each fiscal year a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by a
firm of licensed certified public accountants and submit them to the State Auditor. Pursuant to that
requirement, we hereby issue the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) of the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
This report consists of management’s representations concerning the finances of the City of Lino Lakes.
Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the
information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations,
management of the City of Lino Lakes has established a comprehensive internal control framework that is
designed both to protect the government’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient
reliable information for the preparation of the City of Lino Lakes’ financial statements in conformity with
GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the City’s comprehensive
framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that
the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best
of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.
The City of Lino Lakes’ financial statements have been audited by Redpath and Company, a firm of licensed
certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the
financial statements of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, are free of material
misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The
independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an
unmodified opinion that the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, are
fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent auditor’s report is presented as the first
component of the financial section of this report.
GAAP require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview and analysis to accompany the
basic financial statements in the form of a Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of
transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City of
Lino Lakes’ MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors.
3
Profile of the Government
The City of Lino Lakes, incorporated in 1955, is a growing community in the southeast corner of Anoka
County. It covers an area of 33 square miles and has a population of approximately 22,376. The population
has grown by over 30% since 2000. Within the City’s borders lies the 5,500 acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes
Regional Park. Access to St. Paul and Minneapolis is provided by I-35W and I-35E.
The City Charter, as amended, establishes a mayor-council form of government and grants the City Council
full policy-making and legislative authority to the Mayor and four Council Members. The City Council is
responsible, among other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and
hiring a City Administrator. The City Administrator has the responsibility of carrying out the policies and
ordinances of the City Council and for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the City. The City Council
is elected at-large on a non-partisan basis, with Council Members serving four-year terms and the Mayor
serving a two-year term. Elections are held every two years with two council seats and the Mayor being up
for election each election cycle.
The City provides a full range of municipal services. These services include: general government, public
safety (police, fire and building inspections), public works (streets and fleet), culture and recreation (parks
and recreation), conservation of natural resources (environmental, solid waste abatement, forestry),
community development, public improvements, and providing and maintaining water, sewer, and storm
water infrastructure.
The annual budget is the foundation for the City of Lino Lakes’ financial planning and control. All
departments are required to submit appropriations requests to the City Administrator for review and
consolidation into a proposed budget. The City Administrator is responsible for submitting the proposed
annual budget to the City Council in August of each year. The City Council is required to hold a public
hearing on the proposed budget and to adopt by resolution a final budget and certify it no later than
December 30. The budget amounts cannot increase beyond the estimated receipts except to the extent that
actual receipts exceed the estimate. Department Directors may make transfers of appropriations within a
department, but transfers of appropriations between departments require City Council approval. Budget-to-
actual comparisons for the General Fund and The Rookery Activity Center Fund, the only governmental
funds for which an annual budget has been adopted, are provided in Statements 10 and 11, respectively.
Factors Affecting Financial Condition
The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered from
the broader perspective of the specific environment within which the City of Lino Lakes operates.
Local economy. Commercial and industrial sectors remain strong with few vacancies and new commercial
projects underway on both the 35W and 35E Corridors. Approximately 76,000 square feet of industrial
space was added in 2024. Five new free-standing national-chain projects are currently underway.
The 35E corridor has also gained additional attention through a partnership with Anoka and Washington
Counties, neighboring cities, and Connexus Energy, to establish the Minnesota Technology Corridor. Over
1,000 acres are available along the corridor with strong transportation, fiber and utility infrastructure to
serve the growing data and tech fields.
The City recently approved the 93 lot Nature’s Refuge North, a single-family development and the City’s
largest residential development, the 864 lot Watermark project, expanded into its eighth addition. Multiple
4
Factors Affecting Financial Condition (Continued)
residential projects are currently in the review process from both local and national developers with
construction expected to commence in summer of 2025.
Overall, the City continued to see substantial development activity in 2024. The City issued building
permits for 126 residential units and three new commercial establishments in 2024. The total building
permit valuation was approximately $77 million.
Long-term financial planning. The City’s current Financial Plan identifies capital equipment purchases
and building and infrastructure improvements totaling $92 million over the five-year period. These
improvements are anticipated to be funded through a number of funding sources, including tax levies,
special assessments, fund reserves, bond proceeds, and intergovernmental grants. The Plan is currently
being revised to reflect the anticipated activity through fiscal year 2030.
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awards the
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting (COA) to cities that meet certain criteria.
The City of Lino Lakes received this award for its ACFR for the year ended December 31, 2023. This marks
the twenty-ninth consecutive year the City has received this prestigious award. A governmental unit must
publish an easily readable and efficiently organized ACFR, the contents of which conform to program
requirements. This report must satisfy both GAAP and applicable legal requirements.
The COA is valid for a period of one year. The City is submitting the 2024 report to GFOA for consideration
of the COA. We believe our current report continues to conform to the high standards of the program.
The timely preparation of this report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of
the Finance Department, auditors and other city staff. I want to express my appreciation to the Mayor and
City Council for their support for maintaining the highest standard of professionalism in the management
of the financial operation of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
Kelly Horn, Interim Finance Director
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
5
- This page intentionally left blank -
6
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Lino Lakes
Minnesota
For its Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2023
Executive Director/CEO
7
- This page intentionally left blank -
8
City of Lino Lakes Organizational Chart
City Council
City Administrator
Administration Finance Community
Development
Public Services Public Safety
City Clerk Accounting
and Payroll
Planning The Rookery
Activity Center
Police Division
Human Resources Utility Billing Economic
Development
Engineering
Environmental
Services
Government
Buildings
Public Works
Street / Fleet / Utility
Maintenance
Parks
Building Inspections
Fire Division
Advisory Board &
Commissions
Information
Technology
Emergency
Management/
Administration
Communications
9
- This page intentionally left blank -
10
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL CITY OFFICIALS
December 31, 2024
Term Expires
Mayor: Rob Rafferty December 31, 2025
Councilmembers: Dale Stoesz December 31, 2025
Tony Cavegn December 31, 2025
Chris Lyden December 31, 2027
Michael Ruhland December 31, 2027
Interim City Administrator: David Pecchia Appointed
Directors:
Community Development Michael Grochala Appointed
Finance Hannah Lynch Appointed
Public Safety John Swenson Appointed
Public Services Richard DeGardner Appointed
11
- This page intentionally left blank -
12
FINANCIAL SECTION
13
- This page intentionally left blank -
14
400 Robert Street North, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN, 55101 651.426.7000 www.redpathcpas.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the
business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota,
as of December 31, 2024, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable,
cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City of
Lino Lakes, Minnesota and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the
relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and
for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation
and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
15
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are
conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City of
Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the
financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial
doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor's report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but
is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always
detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion,
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in
the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the
financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and
Governmental Auditing Standards, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the
audit.
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks.
Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota's internal
control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall
presentation of the financial statements.
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the
aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota's ability to
continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal
control related matters that we identified during the audit.
16
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the
management’s discussion and analysis, the budgetary comparison schedules, and the schedules
of OPEB and pension information, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement
the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and,
although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the
basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We
have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of
inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the
information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial
statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements.
We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited
procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any
assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that
collectively comprise the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota's basic financial statements. The
accompanying combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules are
presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial
statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and
relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial
statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and
reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to
prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other
additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial
statements and schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic
financial statements as a whole.
Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other
information comprises the introductory and statistical sections but does not include the basic
financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial
statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of
assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the
other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other
information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be
materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material
misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report.
17
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated
May 22, 2025 on our consideration of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s internal control over
financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to
describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and
the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in
considering the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting and
compliance.
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LLC
St. Paul, Minnesota
May 22, 2025
18
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
As management of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the City), we offer readers of the City’s
financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. We encourage readers to consider the information
presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of
transmittal, which can be found in the introductory section of this report.
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $155,249,603 (net position).
Of this amount, $43,812,026 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing
obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal
policies.
The City’s total net position increased by $10,930,604.
As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined
ending fund balances of $36,850,557, an increase of $2,833,504. Of this amount, $6,441,358 is
restricted by external constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or by state
statutory provisions.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the general fund balance was $9,556,417. Unassigned fund
balance for the general fund was $8,931,762, or 70% of total general fund expenditures and other
financing uses.
In 2024, the City secured financing assistance from the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority
(MPFA) for the construction of a new water treatment plant. This funding package includes
$16.5 million in Special Appropriations Grants from the State of Minnesota, along with grants
from the Federal Drinking Water Revolving Fund. These grants are received on a
reimbursement basis, during the year $3,840,963 was recognized as intergovernmental revenue.
Additionally, the City was awarded up to $15,996,190 through the Drinking Water State
Revolving Loan from the MPFA, structured as a water revenue note. Over the course of the year,
the City issued $1,216,285 against the 2024 G.O. Water Revenue Note (MPFA), with further
draws expected as construction progresses.
No other new debt was issued, while regularly scheduled principal payments were made during
the year. Total outstanding debt decreased by $975,009 during 2024.
19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial
statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-
wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements.
This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial
statements themselves.
Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are
designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to
a private-sector business.
The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the City’s assets and deferred
outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference
between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may
serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or
deteriorating.
The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed
during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the
underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows.
Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in
cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).
Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are
principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from
other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user
fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include
general government, public safety, public works, culture and recreation, conservation of natural
resources, and community development. The business-type activities of the City include water,
sewer, and storm water utilities.
The government-wide financial statements are statements 1 and 2 of this report.
Fund Financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain
control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City,
like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate
compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided
into two categories: governmental funds and proprietary funds.
Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same
functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial
statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on
balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be
useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial
statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar
20
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City's near-term financial
decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of
revenues, expenditures and change in fund balance provide a reconciliation to facilitate this
comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.
The City maintains six individual major governmental funds. Information is presented
separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of
revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the following major funds:
General Fund
The Rookery Activity Center – Special Revenue Fund
G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2016B – Debt Service Fund
Capital Equipment Replacement – Capital Project Fund
Area and Unit Trunk – Capital Project Fund
MSA Construction – Capital Project Fund
Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of
combining statements elsewhere in this report.
The basic governmental fund financial statements are statements 3 through 5 of this report.
The City adopts annual appropriated budgets for the General Fund and The Rookery Activity
Center Fund. Budgetary comparison schedules are presented as statements 10 and 11 of this
report.
Proprietary funds. The City maintains three enterprise funds as a part of its proprietary fund
type. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities
in the government-wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its
water, sewer, and storm water utilities.
The proprietary fund statements provide the same type of information as the government-wide
financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide
separate information for the Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Funds, which are considered to be
major funds of the City.
The basic proprietary fund financial statements are statements 7 through 9 of this report.
Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to
a full understanding of the data provided in the government–wide and fund financial statements.
The notes to the financial statements can be found following statement 9.
Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major
governmental funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary
information. Combining and individual fund statements and schedules are presented as
statements 19 through 26.
21
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Government-Wide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's
financial position. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded
liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $155,249,603 at the close of the most recent fiscal
year.
The largest portion of the City’s net position ($104,059,186 or 67%) reflects its net investment in
capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, equipment, and infrastructure) less any related debt used to
acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide
services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although
the City’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that
the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital
assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
City of Lino Lakes’ Net Position
Of the City’s net position, $7,378,391 represents resources that are subject to external restrictions
on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($43,812,026) may
be used to meet ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all three
categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate
governmental and business-type activities.
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023
Assets:
Current and other assets $49,440,507 $44,586,667 $16,200,074 $16,270,032 $65,640,581 $60,856,699
Capital assets 66,877,583 66,000,296 57,415,794 50,119,172 124,293,377 116,119,468
Total assets 116,318,090 110,586,963 73,615,868 66,389,204 189,933,958 176,976,167
Deferred outflows of resources 5,617,140 7,546,180 122,256 214,180 5,739,396 7,760,360
Liabilities:
Long-term liabilities outstanding 19,665,236 23,058,533 1,325,126 583,183 20,990,362 23,641,716
Other liabilities 9,838,612 7,291,313 735,167 348,157 10,573,779 7,639,470
Total liabilities 29,503,848 30,349,846 2,060,293 931,340 31,564,141 31,281,186
Deferred inflows of resources 8,624,053 8,959,057 235,557 177,285 8,859,610 9,136,342
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 50,860,601 48,061,305 53,198,585 50,119,172 104,059,186 98,180,477
Restricted 7,378,391 9,398,180 - - 7,378,391 9,398,180
Unrestricted 25,568,337 21,364,755 18,243,689 15,375,587 43,812,026 36,740,342
Total net position $83,807,329 $78,824,240 $71,442,274 $65,494,759 $155,249,603 $144,318,999
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
22
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The City’s net position increased by $10,930,604 during 2024. Key elements of this increase are
as follows:
City of Lino Lakes’ Changes in Net Position
Governmental Activities
Governmental activities increased the City’s net position by $4,983,089 during 2024. Developer
contributions were primarily responsible for the increase in net position, as well as an overall net
reduction in long-term debt. Unrestricted investment earnings also played a role in the increase
to net position in 2024, due to unrealized gains and interest earnings on investments with the
stable interest rate environment.
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023
Revenues:
Program revenues:
Charges for services $3,911,025 $4,468,912 $4,817,812 $4,955,645 $8,728,837 $9,424,557
Operating grants and contributions 1,480,903 1,866,131 7,589 59,032 1,488,492 1,925,163
Capital grants and contributions 8,609,291 2,996,602 2,119,227 8,545 10,728,518 3,005,147
General revenues:
General property taxes 14,158,781 12,868,894 - - 14,158,781 12,868,894
Other taxes 196,911 217,779 - - 196,911 217,779
Tax increment 1,002,712 903,027 - - 1,002,712 903,027
Grants and contributions not
restricted to specific programs 2,364 270,011 - - 2,364 270,011
Unrestricted investment earnings 1,517,537 1,554,657 603,782 728,010 2,121,319 2,282,667
Gain on disposal of capital assets 143,601 35,689 - - 143,601 35,689
Total revenues 31,023,125 25,181,702 7,548,410 5,751,232 38,571,535 30,932,934
Expenses:
General government 4,134,836 3,041,049 - - 4,134,836 3,041,049
Public safety 7,045,702 7,130,294 - - 7,045,702 7,130,294
Public works 6,218,466 5,604,543 - - 6,218,466 5,604,543
Culture and recreation 3,283,500 3,350,309 - - 3,283,500 3,350,309
Conservation of natural resources 732,201 257,150 - - 732,201 257,150
Community development 287,271 531,413 - - 287,271 531,413
Interest and fees on long-term debt 410,330 497,903 - - 410,330 497,903
Water - - 2,130,173 2,027,102 2,130,173 2,027,102
Sewer - - 2,989,132 2,535,243 2,989,132 2,535,243
Storm water - - 409,320 577,404 409,320 577,404
Total expenses 22,112,306 20,412,661 5,528,625 5,139,749 27,640,931 25,552,410
Increase in net position before transfers 8,910,819 4,769,041 2,019,785 611,483 10,930,604 5,380,524
Transfers (3,927,730) (516,310) 3,927,730 516,310 - -
Change in net position 4,983,089 4,252,731 5,947,515 1,127,793 10,930,604 5,380,524
Net position - January 1 78,824,240 74,571,509 65,494,759 64,366,966 144,318,999 138,938,475
Net position - December 31 $83,807,329 $78,824,240 $71,442,274 $65,494,759 $155,249,603 $144,318,999
Business-Type Activities TotalsGovernmental Activities
23
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues
and expenses:
24
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Business-Type Activities
Business-type activities increased the City’s net position by $5,947,515 during 2024. Capital
grants and contributions increased in 2024, resulting from developer contributed infrastructure,
and the transfers-in of capital assets constructed in the governmental activities funds. Business-
type activities had positive operating results in the Storm Water fund, but these were offset by
operating losses in the Water and Sewer funds.
Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the business-type activities revenues
and expenses:
25
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Financial Analysis of the Government's Funds
Governmental Funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on
near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending
fund balances of $36,850,557. Approximately 17% of this total amount ($6,441,358) constitutes
fund balance restricted by external constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or
by state statutory provisions. Of the remaining fund balance, $713,505 is not in a spendable
form, $388,929 has been committed, $22,269,960 has been assigned, and $7,036,805 is
unassigned.
The General fund balance increased by $972,537. Overall revenues increased by approximately
$1,143,000 over 2023. Property taxes, intergovernmental revenues and charges for services were
the major drivers of the increase over the prior year due to an increased tax levy and increased
state aids. The increases in revenues were partially offset by increased expenditures over 2023,
however the City had fewer transfers-out, which resulted in the net increase in fund balance
outperforming 2023 by $475,174.
The Rookery Activity Center opened to the public in May 2022. The fund balance improved
from a deficit of $5,067 to a positive $77,356 in 2024 resulting from positive operating activity,
and an increase in the tax levy over the prior year levy. During 2024, the Fund had revenues
over expenditures of $82,423, whereas 2023’s expenditures exceeded revenues by
$335,089. While the Rookery operating revenues fell short of budget, primarily in charges for
services, expenditures were also under budget, primarily in personal services. The tax levy
increased by $100,000 in 2025 with the goal of total revenues covering total expenditures for the
current and future years.
The G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2016B deficit fund balance increased by $1,728,204 during the
year and the fund was closed at year end. The 2016B series bonds were issued to refund the
2005A series bonds and fund the Legacy at Woods Edge improvements. The bonds matured in
2021, and future tax increment was expected to cover the interfund loan payable. During 2024
the interfund loan payable liability was transferred to the TIF 1-11 Legacy at Woods Edge Fund
where it will continue to be reduced by future tax increment.
The Capital Equipment Replacement fund balance increased by $679,463 due to a significant
increase in the property tax levy and proceeds from the sale of fixed assets. The fund also
reduced its interfund loan payable by its scheduled payments. The interfund loan payable will
continue to be paid back with a tax levy over the next nine years. The fund accounts for the
replacement of public safety and public works equipment and vehicles financed by a pay as you
go tax levy.
The Area and Unit Trunk fund has a total fund balance of $10,419,643, all of which is assigned
for financing water and sewer capital improvements, including the new water treatment plant.
The fund balance increased during the current year by $857,318 primarily due to investment
earnings and trunk fees (either collected over time through special assessments or paid up front
through charges for services). Intergovernmental revenues also were received for much of the
covered project costs that were incurred during the year.
26
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The MSA Construction Fund has a total fund balance of $4,283,196, all of which is assigned to
capital improvements for City MSA designated roadways. The fund balance during the current
year decreased by $527,228 primarily due to project costs exceeding revenues. Capital activity
occurred on the Marketplace Drive realignment project and the Otter Lake Road extension
during 2024.
The combined fund balance of other governmental funds decreased by $959,213 during 2024
primarily due to debt repayments and nonmajor capital project funds activities.
Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in
the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail.
The Water Fund has a total net position at year-end of $38,808,686, of which $7,798,516 is
unrestricted. The increase in net position of 5,094,747 was primarily due to capital contributions
from governmental activities. The Area and Unit Trunk Fund is funding water infrastructure,
including the water treatment plant and trunk watermain additions.
The Sewer Fund has a total net position at year-end of $32,270,204 of which $10,081,789 is
unrestricted. The increase in net position of $736,859 was primarily due to developer
contributed infrastructure additions, particularly in the Watermark 5th and 6th Additions.
The Storm Water Fund has a total net position at year-end of $363,384 of which all is
unrestricted. The Storm Water Utility was established in 2022 to fund the operation and
management of the City’s storm water infrastructure.
Budgetary Highlights
General Fund
There were no amendments to the original budget in 2024.
Budgeted revenues for 2024 were $12,998,968. Actual revenues exceeded the budget by
$727,213. General property taxes and other taxes were the only revenue source category that did
not exceed its budget. Intergovernmental revenues were stronger than budgeted primarily due to
recognizing the portion of the Fire State Aid which is passed through to the PERA Statewide
Volunteer Firefighter Retirement Plan, which was not budgeted. Investment earnings also
contributed to the positive budget variance.
Budgeted expenditures for 2024 were $13,018,968. Actual expenditures were $529,874 under
budgeted amounts. The main causes of the under-budget variances were due to personal services
budgeting for positions that remained vacant during the year.
The City carried out its budgeted transfer out to the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund but
additionally made a small transfer out to the Comp Plan Update capital project fund and
transferred out to the Office Equipment Replacement Fund for the reimbursement of the City’s
new financial ERP software.
27
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Overall, the City budgeted for a $150,000 decrease in fund balance, whereas the actual change in
fund balance was an increase of $972,537, which was $1,122,537 over the 2024 budget.
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type
activities as of December 31, 2024, amounted to $123,663,377 (net of accumulated
depreciation), an increase of $7,543,909 from the prior year. This investment in capital assets
includes land, wetland credits, construction in progress, buildings, equipment, vehicles, and
infrastructure.
The Lake Drive Trunk Water Main, Pheasant Run Reconstruction, and Watermark Park were
completed in 2024. The City is working to complete the Water Treatment Plant, Marketplace
Drive realignment, Otter Lake Road extension, 2024 Trunk Watermain and the 2025 Street
Reconstruction projects.
City of Lino Lakes’ Capital Assets
(Net of Depreciation)
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 5 to the financial
statements.
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023
Land $5,731,330 $5,698,330 $374,867 $374,867 $6,106,197 $6,073,197
Wetland credits 49,042 49,042 - - 49,042 49,042
Construction in progress 1,805,192 5,871,019 6,915,299 4,040,557 8,720,491 9,911,576
Buildings 8,267,376 8,929,708 - - 8,267,376 8,929,708
Equipment 4,861,969 4,998,947 558,623 418,744 5,420,592 5,417,691
Land improvements 2,832,650 1,676,153 - - 2,832,650 1,676,153
Other equipment 31,821 34,656 - - 31,821 34,656
Infrastructure 43,298,203 38,742,441 48,937,005 45,285,004 92,235,208 84,027,445
Total $66,877,583 $66,000,296 $56,785,794 $50,119,172 $123,663,377 $116,119,468
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
28
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded debt
outstanding of $16,942,509. All outstanding debt carries the general obligation backing for
which the City is liable in the event of default by the property owners subject to the specific
taxes, special assessments, or revenues pledged to the retirement of the debt. In addition, the
City has issued a water revenue note payable to the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority
(MPFA) for construction costs of its water treatment plant. The City issued $1,216,285 on this
note in 2024 and can borrow up to $15,996,190 over the construction period.
City of Lino Lakes’ Outstanding Debt
The City of Lino Lakes’ total bonded debt decreased by $975,009 during the current fiscal year
as regularly scheduled principal payments were made during the year. Additional information on
the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 6.
Requests for information. This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of
the City’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions
concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial
information should be addressed to the Finance Director, City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center
Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014.
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023
General obligation bonds $14,875,000 $16,735,000 $ - $ - $14,875,000 $16,735,000
G.O. special assessment bonds 195,000 415,000 - - 195,000 415,000
Direct borrowings - 35,475 1,216,285 - 1,216,285 35,475
Bond premium (discount)656,224 732,043 - - 656,224 732,043
Total $15,726,224 $17,917,518 $1,216,285 $0 $16,942,509 $17,917,518
Business-Type Activities TotalsGovernmental Activities
29
- This page intentionally left blank -
30
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
31
- This page intentionally left blank -
32
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION Statement 1
December 31, 2024
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $42,329,271 $13,492,069 $55,821,340
Accrued interest receivable 248,791 - 248,791
Due from other governments 2,844,173 5,487 2,849,660
Accounts receivable - net 71,923 693,259 765,182
Prepaid items 613,505 183,377 796,882
Internal balances (2,368,218) 2,368,218 -
Inventory - 85,378 85,378
Taxes receivable 437,386 - 437,386
Special assessments receivable 2,984,514 2,286 2,986,800
Leases receivable 1,583,577 - 1,583,577
Net pension asset 695,585 - 695,585
Capital assets - nondepreciable 7,585,564 7,290,166 14,875,730
Capital assets - net of accumulated depreciation 59,292,019 49,495,628 108,787,647
Total assets 116,318,090 73,615,868 189,933,958
Deferred outflows of resources:
Pension related 5,319,229 122,256 5,441,485
OPEB related 297,911 - 297,911
Total deferred outflows of resources 5,617,140 122,256 5,739,396
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities 4,073,025 283,270 4,356,295
Due to other governments 77,062 14,777 91,839
Accrued interest payable 178,231 3,092 181,323
Unearned revenue 90,867 - 90,867
Deposits payable 2,978,397 4,600 2,982,997
Other post employment benefits:
Due in more than one year 737,331 103,700 841,031
Long-term liabilities:
Due within one year 2,441,030 429,428 2,870,458
Due in more than one year 14,463,949 914,219 15,378,168
Net pension liability:
Due in more than one year 4,463,956 307,207 4,771,163
Total liabilities 29,503,848 2,060,293 31,564,141
Deferred inflows of resources:
Lease related 1,583,577 - 1,583,577
Pension related 6,670,897 235,557 6,906,454
OPEB related 369,579 - 369,579
Total deferred inflows of resources 8,624,053 235,557 8,859,610
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 50,860,601 53,198,585 104,059,186
Restricted (nonexpendable) for environmental purposes 100,000 - 100,000
Restricted (expendable) for:
Debt service 3,920,983 - 3,920,983
Park improvements 1,263,854 - 1,263,854
Public safety 601,134 - 601,134
Economic development 739,254 - 739,254
Fire Department pension plan 695,585 - 695,585
Other purposes 57,581 - 57,581
Unrestricted 25,568,337 18,243,689 43,812,026
Total net position $83,807,329 $71,442,274 $155,249,603
Primary Government
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Program Revenues
Charges For
Functions/Programs Expenses Services
Primary government:
Governmental activities:
General government $4,134,836 $434,283
Public safety 7,045,702 1,489,612
Public works 6,218,466 149,389
Culture and recreation 3,283,500 1,837,741
Conservation of natural resources 732,201 -
Community development 287,271 -
Interest and fees on long-term debt 410,330 -
Total governmental activities 22,112,306 3,911,025
Business-type activities:
Water 2,130,173 2,072,108
Sewer 2,989,132 2,186,487
Storm water 409,320 559,217
Total business-type activities 5,528,625 4,817,812
Total primary government $27,640,931 $8,728,837
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34
Statement 2
Operating Capital
Grants and Grants and Governmental Business-Type
Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total
$77,695 $ - ($3,622,858)$ - ($3,622,858)
748,715 - (4,807,375) - (4,807,375)
454,402 8,609,291 2,994,616 - 2,994,616
15,325 - (1,430,434) - (1,430,434)
96,482 - (635,719) - (635,719)
88,284 - (198,987) - (198,987)
- - (410,330) - (410,330)
1,480,903 8,609,291 (8,111,087) - (8,111,087)
7,589 911,151 - 860,675 860,675
- 1,208,076 - 405,431 405,431
- - - 149,897 149,897
7,589 2,119,227 - 1,416,003 1,416,003
$1,488,492 $10,728,518 (8,111,087)1,416,003 (6,695,084)
General revenues:
General property taxes 14,158,781 - 14,158,781
Other taxes 196,911 - 196,911
Tax increment 1,002,712 - 1,002,712
Grants and contributions not
restricted to specific programs 2,364 - 2,364
Unrestricted investment earnings 1,517,537 603,782 2,121,319
Gain on disposal of capital assets 143,601 - 143,601
Transfers (3,927,730)3,927,730 -
Total general revenues and transfers 13,094,176 4,531,512 17,625,688
Change in net position 4,983,089 5,947,515 10,930,604
Net position - January 1 78,824,240 65,494,759 144,318,999
Net position - December 31 $83,807,329 $71,442,274 $155,249,603
Program Revenues
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Changes in Net Position
Primary Government
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
35
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2024
202
The Rookery
General Fund Activity Center
Assets
Cash and investments $12,219,374 $221,692
Accrued interest receivable 248,791 -
Due from other governments 232,772 -
Accounts receivable - net 61,247 10,676
Prepaid items 557,155 56,350
Advances to other funds - -
Taxes receivable:
Due from county 159,604 -
Delinquent 109,829 -
Special assessments receivable:
Due from county - -
Delinquent - -
Deferred 410 -
Leases receivable 417,664 -
Interfund loan receivable - -
Total assets $14,006,846 $288,718
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $432,182 $73,598
Salaries payable 441,050 43,232
Due to other governments 70,897 6,165
Advances from other funds - -
Retainage payable - -
Unearned revenue - 88,367
Deposits payable 2,978,397 -
Interfund loan payable - -
Total liabilities 3,922,526 211,362
Deferred inflows of resources:
Unavailable revenue 110,239 -
Lease related 417,664 -
Total deferred inflows of resources 527,903 -
Fund balance:
Nonspendable 557,155 56,350
Restricted - -
Committed 67,500 21,006
Assigned - -
Unassigned 8,931,762 -
Total fund balance 9,556,417 77,356
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of $14,006,846 $288,718
resources, and fund balance
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
36
Statement 3
402 Capital Other Total
Equipment 406 Area and 420 MSA Governmental Governmental
Replacement Unit Trunk Construction Funds Funds
$1,527,992 $10,363,105 $4,338,835 $13,658,273 $42,329,271
- - - - 248,791
- 2,611,401 - - 2,844,173
- - - - 71,923
- - - - 613,505
- - - 202,000 202,000
- - - 167,953 327,557
- - - - 109,829
- 613 232 2,061 2,906
- 6,456 3,262 994 10,712
- 890,238 1,602,924 477,324 2,970,896
- - - 1,165,913 1,583,577
- - - 738,060 738,060
$1,527,992 $13,871,813 $5,945,253 $16,412,578 $52,053,200
$ - $2,377,881 $55,871 $454,227 $3,393,759
- - - - 484,282
- - - - 77,062
- - - 202,000 202,000
- 177,595 - 17,389 194,984
- - - 2,500 90,867
- - - - 2,978,397
1,809,108 - - 1,297,170 3,106,278
1,809,108 2,555,476 55,871 1,973,286 10,527,629
- 896,694 1,606,186 478,318 3,091,437
- - - 1,165,913 1,583,577
- 896,694 1,606,186 1,644,231 4,675,014
- - - 100,000 713,505
- - - 6,441,358 6,441,358
- - - 300,423 388,929
- 10,419,643 4,283,196 7,567,121 22,269,960
(281,116) - - (1,613,841) 7,036,805
(281,116) 10,419,643 4,283,196 12,795,061 36,850,557
$1,527,992 $13,871,813 $5,945,253 $16,412,578 $52,053,200
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
37
- This page intentionally left blank -
38
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL Statement 4
FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2024
Fund balance - total governmental funds (Statement 3) $36,850,557
Net position reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position is
different because:
Certain assets used in governmental activities are not current financial resources and,
therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Capital assets 66,877,583
Net pension asset 695,585
Other long-term assets are not available to pay for current-period expenditures and
therefore, are reported as unavailable revenue in the funds:
Delinquent taxes receivable 109,829
Delinquent special assessments receivable 10,712
Deferred special assessments receivable 2,970,896
Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not
reported in the funds. Long-term liabilities at year end consist of:
Bonds and notes payable (15,070,000)
Unamortized bond premiums (657,458)
Unamortized bond discounts 1,234
Accrued interest payable (178,231)
Compensated absences payable (1,178,755)
Other post employment benefits (737,331)
Net pension liability (4,463,956)
Deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions and OPEB are associated
with long-term liabilities that are not due and payable in the current period, and therefore,
are not reported in the funds. Balances at year end are:
Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions 5,319,229
Deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB 297,911
Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions (6,670,897)
Deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB (369,579)
Net position of governmental activities (Statement 1)$83,807,329
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
39
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
202 342 G.O.
The Rookery Improvement
General Fund Activity Center Bonds of 2016B
Revenues:
General property taxes $10,399,167 $500,000 $ -
Other taxes 133,969 - -
Tax increment - - -
Licenses and permits 1,143,987 - -
Special assessments 382 - -
Intergovernmental 1,057,662 8,825 -
Charges for services 557,880 1,277,687 -
Fines and forfeits 96,282 - -
Investment earnings 301,634 4,581 -
Miscellaneous 35,218 77,939 -
Total revenues 13,726,181 1,869,032 -
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 2,718,462 - -
Public safety 6,435,117 - -
Public works 1,787,741 - -
Culture and recreation 997,320 1,786,609 -
Conservation of natural resources 247,911 - -
Community development 302,543 - -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - -
Public works - - -
Culture and recreation - - -
Debt service:
Principal - - -
Interest and fiscal charges - - -
Total expenditures 12,489,094 1,786,609 -
Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,237,087 82,423 -
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 20,000 - 1,728,204
Transfers out (286,590) - -
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 2,040 - -
Total other financing sources (uses)(264,550) - 1,728,204
Net change in fund balance 972,537 82,423 1,728,204
Fund balance - January 1 8,583,880 (5,067) (1,728,204)
Fund balance - December 31 $9,556,417 $77,356 $ -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
40
Statement 5
402 Capital Other Total
Equipment 406 Area and 420 MSA Governmental Governmental
Replacement Unit Trunk Construction Funds Funds
$823,598 $ - $ - $2,402,724 $14,125,489
- - - 62,942 196,911
- - - 1,002,712 1,002,712
- - - - 1,143,987
- 1,566,841 67,929 629,774 2,264,926
- 4,001,251 8,468 92,284 5,168,490
10,000 - - 694,080 2,539,647
- - - 5,375 101,657
56,972 427,648 202,947 523,755 1,517,537
8,138 - 14,941 8,200 144,436
898,708 5,995,740 294,285 5,421,846 28,205,792
- - - 390,460 3,108,922
6,401 - - 116,914 6,558,432
- 67,662 281,818 246,316 2,383,537
- - - 55,359 2,839,288
- - - 7,850 255,761
- - - 437,159 739,702
332,528 - - 92,532 425,060
367,448 5,050,572 631,753 2,063,491 8,113,264
- - - 739,636 739,636
- - - 2,115,475 2,115,475
- 5,000 - 508,966 513,966
706,377 5,123,234 913,571 6,774,158 27,793,043
192,331 872,506 (619,286) (1,352,312)412,749
150,000 1,818,191 232,529 2,471,599 6,420,523
- (1,833,379)(140,471) (2,079,625) (4,340,065)
337,132 - 1,125 340,297
487,132 (15,188)92,058 393,099 2,420,755
679,463 857,318 (527,228)(959,213) 2,833,504
(960,579) 9,562,325 4,810,424 13,754,274 34,017,053
($281,116) $10,419,643 $4,283,196 $12,795,061 $36,850,557
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
41
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,Statement 6
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OF
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Net change in fund balance - total governmental funds (Statement 5) $2,833,504
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement
of Activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and
reported as depreciation expense:
Capital outlay 9,277,960
Capital outlay not capitalized (1,304,228)
Depreciation (4,341,126)
Various other transactions involving capital assets increase (decrease) net position on
the Statement of Activities, but are not reported in governmental funds because they
do not provide (or use) current financial resources:
Contributions of infrastructure from private sources 3,449,565
Contributions of infrastructure to business-type activities (6,008,188)
Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (196,696)
Revenues in the Statement of Activities that do not provide current financial resources
are not reported as revenues in the funds:
Change in delinquent taxes receivable 33,292
Change in delinquent special assessments receivable (2,189)
Change in deferred special assessments receivable (952,442)
The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds,
while repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources.
Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net position. Also, governmental funds
report the effects of bond premiums and discounts when the debt is first issued, whereas
amounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the debt in the Statement of Activities.
Repayment of principal 2,115,475
Amortization of bond premiums and discounts 75,819
Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current
financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental
funds. Expenses reported in the Statement of Activities include the effects of the
changes in these expense accruals as follows:
Change in accrued interest payable 27,817
Change in compensated absences payable (363,477)
Change in OPEB liability and related deferred outflows and inflows of resources (27,492)
Pension expense in governmental funds is measured by current year employer contributions.
Pension expense in the Statement of Activities is measured by the change in the net pension
liability and related deferred inflows and outflows of resources. This is the amount by which
pension expense differed from pension contributions.365,495
Change in net position of governmental activities (Statement 2)$4,983,089
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
42
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION Statement 7
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2024
601 Water 602 Sewer 603 Storm Water Total
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $5,442,633 $7,633,589 $415,847 $13,492,069
Due from other governments 2,645 2,842 - 5,487
Accounts receivable - net 321,218 305,320 69,007 695,545
Prepaid items 30,008 147,246 6,123 183,377
Inventory 85,378 - - 85,378
Total current assets 5,881,882 8,088,997 490,977 14,461,856
Noncurrent assets:
Interfund loan receivable - 2,368,218 - 2,368,218
Capital assets:
Land 374,867 - - 374,867
Construction in progress 6,666,699 248,600 - 6,915,299
Equipment 307,264 570,307 - 877,571
Water and sewer systems 40,815,980 34,779,412 - 75,595,392
Total capital assets 48,164,810 35,598,319 - 83,763,129
Less: Allowance for depreciation (13,567,431) (13,409,904) - (26,977,335)
Net capital assets 34,597,379 22,188,415 - 56,785,794
Total noncurrent assets 34,597,379 24,556,633 - 59,154,012
Total assets 40,479,261 32,645,630 490,977 73,615,868
Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions 54,483 54,696 13,077 122,256
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 146,794 87,640 9,655 244,089
Salaries payable 15,718 15,716 7,747 39,181
Due to other governments 14,556 221 - 14,777
Deposits payable 4,600 - - 4,600
Accrued interest payable 3,092 - - 3,092
Compensated absences payable - current portion 33,495 33,495 13,248 80,238
Long-term debt - current portion 349,190 - - 349,190
Total current liabilities 567,445 137,072 30,650 735,167
Noncurrent liabilities:
Compensated absences payable 19,672 19,672 7,780 47,124
Other post employment benefits 39,697 39,697 24,306 103,700
Long-term debt 867,095 - - 867,095
Net pension liability 130,080 132,430 44,697 307,207
Total noncurrent liabilities 1,056,544 191,799 76,783 1,325,126
Total liabilities 1,623,989 328,871 107,433 2,060,293
Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions 101,069 101,251 33,237 235,557
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 31,010,170 22,188,415 - 53,198,585
Unrestricted 7,798,516 10,081,789 363,384 18,243,689
Total net position $38,808,686 $32,270,204 $363,384 $71,442,274
Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
43
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND Statement 8
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
601 Water 602 Sewer 603 Storm Water Totals
Operating revenues:
Charges for services $1,937,526 $2,157,807 $559,217 $4,654,550
Hook-up charges 34,000 28,680 - 62,680
Water meter sales 100,582 - - 100,582
Total operating revenues 2,072,108 2,186,487 559,217 4,817,812
Operating expenses:
Personal services 409,500 419,091 189,706 1,018,297
Materials and supplies 353,106 77,690 5,853 436,649
Contractual services 250,296 297,523 208,377 756,196
MCES sewer charges - 1,291,179 - 1,291,179
Depreciation 927,267 753,799 - 1,681,066
Utilities 97,816 44,614 - 142,430
Other 89,096 105,236 5,384 199,716
Total operating expenses 2,127,081 2,989,132 409,320 5,525,533
Operating income (loss)(54,973) (802,645) 149,897 (707,721)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment earnings 250,835 331,428 21,519 603,782
Interest expense (3,092) - - (3,092)
Intergovernmental revenue 7,589 - - 7,589
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)255,332 331,428 21,519 608,279
Income (loss) before contributions and transfers 200,359 (471,217) 171,416 (99,442)
Contributions and transfers:
Capital contributions from private sources 911,151 1,208,076 - 2,119,227
Capital contributions from governmental activities 6,008,188 - - 6,008,188
Transfer out (2,024,951) - (55,507) (2,080,458)
Total contributions and transfers 4,894,388 1,208,076 (55,507) 6,046,957
Change in net position 5,094,747 736,859 115,909 5,947,515
Net position - January 1 33,713,939 31,533,345 247,475 65,494,759
Net position - December 31 $38,808,686 $32,270,204 $363,384 $71,442,274
Capital
Grants and
Contributions Transfers - Net
Amounts reported above $8,127,415 ($2,080,458)
Amounts reported for business-type activities in the
statement of activities are different because:
Transfer in of capital assets from governmental activities (6,008,188) 6,008,188
Amounts reported on the statement of activities $2,119,227 $3,927,730
CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
44
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Statement 9
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
601 Water 602 Sewer 603 Storm Water Totals
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users $2,070,457 $2,191,108 $566,661 $4,828,226
Payment to suppliers (794,420) (1,795,573) (227,773) (2,817,766)
Payment to employees (384,940) (394,531) (195,993) (975,464)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities 891,097 1,004 142,895 1,034,996
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Intergovernmental revenue 5,289 - - 5,289
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets (120,780) (99,493) - (220,273)
Note proceeds 1,216,285 - - 1,216,285
Repayment of interfund loan receivable - 223,598 - 223,598
Transfers out (2,024,951) - (55,507) (2,080,458)
Net cash flows provided by capital and related financing activities (929,446) 124,105 (55,507) (860,848)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment earnings 250,835 331,428 21,519 603,782
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 217,775 456,537 108,907 783,219
Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 5,224,858 7,177,052 306,940 12,708,850
Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $5,442,633 $7,633,589 $415,847 $13,492,069
Reconciliation of operating income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)($54,973) ($802,645) $149,897 ($707,721)
Adjustments to reconcile operating income
(loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation 927,267 753,799 - 1,681,066
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable - net (1,651)4,621 7,444 10,414
Decrease (increase) in prepaid items (2,930) (3,020)3,026 (2,924)
Decrease (increase) in inventory (5,611) - - (5,611)
Decrease (increase) in deferred outflows of resources 36,497 36,497 18,930 91,924
Increase (decrease) in payables 18,649 23,689 (11,185) 31,153
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities (14,214) - - (14,214)
Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 25,853 25,853 (3,393) 48,313
Increase (decrease) in other post employment benefits 5,529 5,529 645 11,703
Increase (decrease) in net pension liability (66,455) (66,455) (34,469) (167,379)
Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows of resources 23,136 23,136 12,000 58,272
Total adjustments 946,070 803,649 (7,002) 1,742,717
Net cash provided by operating activities $891,097 $1,004 $142,895 $1,034,996
Noncash investing, capital and financing activities:
Contributions of capital assets $6,919,339 $1,208,076 $ - $8,127,415
Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
45
- This page intentionally left blank -
46
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the City) is a public corporation formed under Minnesota Statute 410. As such,
the City is under home rule charter regulations and applicable statutory guidelines.
The basic financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles as applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The
following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY
In accordance with GASB pronouncements and accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the City (the primary
government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City’s
reporting entity as blended component units because of the significance of their operational or financial
relationships with the City.
COMPONENT UNITS
The Economic Development Authority (EDA) of Lino Lakes is an entity legally separate from the City.
However, for financial reporting purposes, the EDA is reported as if it were a part of the City’s operation
because the governing body is substantially the same as the governing body of the City and a financial
benefit or burden relationship exists between the City and the EDA. The EDA does not issue separate
financial statements.
The Housing and Development Authority (HRA) of Lino Lakes is an entity legally separate from the City.
However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City’s operations
because the members of the City Council serve as commission members and a financial benefit or burden
relationship exists between the City and the HRA. The HRA has not yet incurred any financial activity.
B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of
Activities) report information on all of the non-fiduciary activities of the primary government and its
component units. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental
revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees
and charges for support.
The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or
business-type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly
identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to
customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided
by a given function or business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting
the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business-type activity. Taxes and other
items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues.
The fund financial statements are provided for governmental and proprietary funds. The emphasis of
governmental and proprietary fund financial statements is on major individual governmental and enterprise
funds, with each displayed as separate columns in the fund financial statements. All remaining
governmental and enterprise funds are aggregated and reported as nonmajor funds.
47
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as charges for services, result from exchange transactions
associated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those in which each party
receives and gives up essentially equal values. Nonoperating revenues, such as subsidies and investment
earnings, result from nonexchange transactions or incidental activities.
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the
general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
The Rookery Activity Center accounts for the activities relating to The Rookery Activity Center.
The General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 2016B Fund accounts for the accumulation of
resources for, and the payment of, interest, principal and related costs on general long-term debt. The
bonds were used to fund the Legacy at Woods Edge improvements.
The Capital Equipment Replacement Fund accounts for pay-as-you-go capital equipment financing
and financing of capital equipment through donations.
The Area and Unit Trunk Fund accounts for the collection of water and sewer unit charges to be used
for debt payments and construction of infrastructure.
The MSA Construction Fund accounts for the financing of future reconstruction of state aid eligible
streets.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
The Water Fund accounts for customer water service charges which are used to finance water system
operating expenses.
The Sewer Fund accounts for customer sewer service charges which are used to finance sanitary sewer
system operating expenses.
The Storm Water Fund accounts for customer storm water charges which are used to finance storm
water system operating expenses.
C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS AND BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus
and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are
recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants
and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider
have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement
focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both
measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the
current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City
considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of
the end of the current fiscal period. Reimbursement grants are considered available if they are collected
within one year of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability
48
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures
related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due.
Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest
associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been
recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due
within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period.
All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the
City.
As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial
statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures
or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu
of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City. Elimination of these charges
would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned.
Proprietary Funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating
revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in
connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the
water, sewer and storm water enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating
expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and
depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as
nonoperating revenues and expenses.
D. BUDGETS
Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Annual appropriated budgets are adopted for the General Fund and The Rookery
Activity Center special revenue fund. Budgeted expenditure appropriations lapse at year-end. Budgeted
amounts are reported as originally adopted and as amended by the City Council.
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the
expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the appropriation, is not employed by
the City because it is at present not considered necessary to assure effective budgetary control or to
facilitate effective cash management.
E. LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS
The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements:
1. The City Administrator submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget (including the
General Fund and The Rookery Activity Center Fund) for the fiscal year commencing the
following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of
financing them.
2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments.
3. The budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution on a departmental basis and can be
expended by each department based upon detailed budget estimates for individual expenditure
accounts.
49
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
4. The City Administrator is authorized to transfer appropriations within any department budget.
Additional interdepartmental or interfund appropriations and deletions are or may be authorized by
the City Council with fund (contingency) reserves or additional revenues.
5. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year for the
General Fund and The Rookery Activity Center Fund.
6. Legal debt obligation indentures determine the appropriation level and debt service tax levies for
the Debt Service Funds. Supplementary budgets are adopted for the Proprietary Funds to
determine and calculate user charges. These debt service and budget amounts represent general
obligation bond indenture provisions and net income for operation and capital maintenance and
are not reflected in the financial statements.
7. A capital improvement program is reviewed annually by the City Council for the Capital Project
Funds. However, appropriations for major projects are not adopted until the actual bid award of
the improvement. The appropriations are not reflected in the financial statements.
8. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the department level unless
approved by the City Council. Therefore, the legal level of budgetary control is at the department
level (i.e. administration, community development, public safety, public services, and other).
9. The City Council may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between City funds.
F. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and investment balances from all funds are pooled and invested to the extent available in authorized
investments. Investment income is allocated to individual funds on the basis of the fund's equity in the cash
and investment pool.
Investments are stated at fair value, except for investments in external investment pools that meet GASB 79
requirements, which are stated at amortized cost. Interest earnings are accrued at year-end.
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the proprietary funds consider all highly liquid investments
with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. All of the cash and
investments allocated to the proprietary fund types have original maturities of 90 days or less. Therefore,
the entire balance in such fund types is considered cash equivalents.
Permanently restricted cash and investments represents the principal and earnings portion of resources
received that must be retained in a permanent fund. Only earnings from these funds may be used for
purposes that support environmental maintenance and improvements.
G. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION
The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy/assessment
date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting
all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes
become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are
payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are
payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected by the County
and remitted to the City on or before July 15 and December 15 of the same year. Delinquent collections for
November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment
of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority.
50
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Within the government-wide financial statements, the City recognizes property tax revenue in the period
for which taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported.
Within the governmental fund financial statements, the City recognizes property tax revenue when it
becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current
and delinquent taxes received by the City in July, December, and the following January are recognized as
revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the county by December 31 (remitted to the City the
following January) are classified as due from county. Taxes not collected by the county by December 31
are classified as delinquent taxes receivable. Delinquent taxes receivable are fully offset by deferred
inflows of resources because they are not available to finance current expenditures.
The City's property tax revenue includes payments from the Metropolitan Revenue Distribution (Fiscal
Disparities Formula) per State Statute 473F. This statute provides a means of spreading a portion of the
taxable valuation of commercial/industrial real property to various taxing authorities within the defined
metropolitan area. The valuation "shared" is a portion of commercial/industrial property valuation growth
since 1971.
H. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION
Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special
assessment improvement projects in accordance with state statutes. These assessments are collectible by
the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of
annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property
taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future installments without interest or
prepayment penalties.
Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property
until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action.
If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit sale and the first
proceeds of that sale (after costs, penalties and expenses of sale) are remitted to the City in payment of
delinquent special assessments. Generally, the City will collect the full amount of its special assessments
not adjusted by City Council or court action. Pursuant to state statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax
forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational land in which
event the property is subject to such sale after five years.
Within the government-wide financial statements, the City recognizes special assessment revenue in the
period that the assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not
material and have not been reported.
Within the fund financial statements, the revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when
it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice,
current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current
year. Special assessments collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following
January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred and
special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are fully offset by deferred inflows of
resources.
51
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
I. INVENTORY
For governmental funds, the original cost of materials and supplies are recorded as expenditures at the time
of purchase. These funds do not maintain material amounts of inventories.
Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost, which approximates market, using the first-in, first-
out (FIFO) method.
J. PREPAID ITEMS
Certain prepayments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as
prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Prepaid items are reported using the
consumption method and recorded as expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption.
K. LEASES RECEIVABLE
Leases receivable are measured at the present value of lease payments expected to be received during the
lease term. A deferred inflow of resources is recorded for the lease at the commencement of the lease in an
amount equal to the initial recording of the lease receivable and is recognized as revenue over the lease
term.
L. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided
or services rendered. Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or
expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures / expenses initially made
from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the
reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed.
The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash balances by means of an
advance from another fund. Such advances are classified as “advances to/from other funds.” Long-term
interfund loans are classified as “interfund loan receivable/payable.” Any residual balances outstanding
between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-wide
financial statements as “internal balances.” All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers.
M. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (e.g. roads, sidewalks,
drainage systems, water and sewer systems, and similar items) are reported in the applicable governmental
or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined
by the City as assets with an estimated useful life in excess of one year, which have an individual value
equal to or greater than the capitalization thresholds for each asset class as follows:
Land $10,000
Buildings $50,000
Land improvements $25,000
Equipment $10,000
Infrastructure $100,000
52
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated
capital assets are recorded at acquisition value at the date of donation. All existing City infrastructure has
been capitalized regardless of date placed in service.
The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend
assets lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as
projects are constructed.
Depreciation on exhaustible assets is recorded as an allocated expense in the Statement of Activities with
accumulated depreciation reflected in the Statement of Net Position. Capital assets are depreciated using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Since surplus assets are sold for an immaterial
amount when declared as no longer needed for City purposes, no salvage value is taken into consideration
for depreciation purposes. Useful lives vary from 5 to 40 years for buildings, office furniture and
equipment, vehicles, machine shop and equipment and other assets, and 15 to 50 years for infrastructure
and other improvements.
N. COMPENSATED ABSENCES
It is the City’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation, PTO (Personal Time
Off), extended leave and sick pay benefits. All leave that is attributable to services already rendered,
accumulates, and is more likely than not to be used for time off or otherwise paid is accrued in the
government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in
governmental funds only if it has matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations or retirements.
The current portion is calculated based on historical trends.
O. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term
obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or
proprietary fund type Statement of Net Position. Bond premiums and discounts are amortized over the life
of the related debt.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts during
the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums
received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are
reported as other financing uses.
P. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows and inflows of resources, and
pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement
Association (PERA) and additions to and deductions from PERA’s fiduciary net position have been
determined on the same basis as they are reported by PERA, except that PERA’s fiscal year end is June 30.
For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments
and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are
reported at fair value.
53
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Q. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS AND INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position reports a separate section for deferred outflows of
resources. This separate financial statement element represents a consumption of net assets that applies to
future periods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense) until that time. The City
has two items that qualify for reporting in this category. Pension related deferred outflows of resources are
reported in the government-wide statement of net position and the proprietary funds statement of net
position. OPEB related deferred outflows of resources are only reported in the governmental activities
column of the government-wide statement of net position as amounts applicable to business-type activities
are immaterial.
In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position reports a separate section for deferred inflows of
resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net assets that applies to
future periods, and therefore, will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time.
Lease related deferred inflows of resources are reported in the government-wide statement of net position
and the governmental funds balance sheet. Pension related deferred inflows of resources are reported in the
government-wide statement of net position and the proprietary funds statement of net position. OPEB
related deferred inflows of resources are only reported in the governmental activities column of the
government-wide statement of net position as amounts applicable to business-type activities are immaterial.
The City also has a type of item, which arises only under a modified accrual basis of accounting, that
qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the
governmental funds balance sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from the following
sources: property taxes and special assessments not collected within 60 days from year-end.
R. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATIONS
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose
constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows:
Nonspendable - consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items and corpus
of any permanent fund.
Restricted - consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors,
grantors or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions.
Committed - consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints are established by a
resolution approved by the City Council, and committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose
unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by resolution.
Assigned - consists of internally imposed constraints for the specific purpose of the City’s intended
use. These constraints are established by the City Council and/or management. The City Council
passed a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to assign fund balances and their intended uses.
Unassigned - is the residual classification for the general fund. The general fund is the only fund that
reports a positive unassigned fund balance amount. In other governmental funds, if expenditures
incurred for specific purposes exceed the amounts that are restricted, committed or assigned to those
purposes, it may be necessary to report a negative unassigned fund balance in that fund.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use
restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned or
unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1)
committed 2) assigned and 3) unassigned.
54
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
The City formally adopted a fund balance policy for the General Fund. The policy establishes an
unassigned fund balance range of 40% - 50% of general fund operating expenditures.
S. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
Note 2 DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
A. DEPOSITS
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at those depository banks authorized by
the City Council. All such banks are members of the Federal Reserve System.
Minnesota Statutes require that insurance, surety bonds or collateral protect all City deposits. The market
value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of deposits not covered by insurance or bonds. Securities
pledged as collateral are required to be held in safekeeping by the City or in a financial institution other
than that furnishing the collateral. Minnesota Statue 118A.03 identifies allowable forms of collateral.
Custodial Credit Risk – the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City’s deposits may not be returned
to it. The City has no additional deposit policies addressing custodial credit risk.
At December 31, 2024, the bank balance of the City’s deposits with financial institutions was $13,380,912
and the carrying amount was $13,289,330. All deposits were covered by federal depository insurance or by
collateral pledge and held in the City’s name.
55
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
B. INVESTMENTS
Subject to rating, yield, maturity and issuer requirements as prescribed by statute, Minnesota Statutes
118A.04 and 118A.05 authorize the City to invest in United States securities, state and local securities,
commercial paper, time deposits, temporary general obligation bonds, repurchase agreements, Minnesota
joint powers investment trusts and guaranteed investment contracts.
At December 31, 2024, the City had the following investments and maturities:
Fair Less
Investment Type Rating Value Than 1 1 - 3 3 - 6
Municipal bonds * $25,410,740 4,676,411 11,373,385 9,360,944
Brokered certificate of deposits Not rated 9,337,295 3,853,079 4,736,827 747,389
Federal agency securities AA+ 5,312,124 1,333,129 1,650,350 2,328,645
External investment pools:
4M Liquid Asset Class AAAm 713,386 713,386 - -
4M PLUS Class AAAm 486,366 486,366 - -
First American Treasury Obligation Fund AAAm 1,270,659 1,270,659 - -
Total $42,530,570 $12,333,030 $17,760,562 $12,436,978
* AAA $3,050,383; AA+ $4,889,127; AA $12,462,851;Total investments $42,530,570
AA- $4,513,909; A+ $494,470 Deposits 13,289,330
Cash on hand 1,440
Total cash and investments $55,821,340
Investment Maturities (in Years)
The 4M Multi-Class Fund is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of
Minnesota Cities. The 4M Multi-Class Fund has two separate classes, the 4M Liquid Asset Class and the
4M PLUS Class.
The 4M Multi-Class Fund is managed to maintain a portfolio weighted average maturity of no greater than
60 days and seeks to maintain a constant net asset value of $1.00 per share. The Fund’s investments are
measured at amortized cost in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
79. The 4M Liquid Asset Class has no redemption requirements. The 4M PLUS Class requires funds to be
deposited for a minimum of 14 calendar days. Withdrawals prior to the 14-day restriction period are
subject to a penalty equal to seven days interest on the amount withdrawn.
The First American Treasury Obligation money market fund seeks to maintain a constant net asset value of
$1.00 per share. The securities held by the fund are measured at amortized cost. Shares may be redeemed
without penalty on any business day.
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally
accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair
value of the asset. The hierarchy has three levels. Level 1 investments are valued using inputs that are
based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 investments are valued using inputs
that are based on quoted prices for similar assets or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 investments are valued using inputs that are unobservable.
56
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
The City has the following recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2024:
Investment Type 12/31/2024 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Investments at fair value:
Municipal bonds $25,410,740 $ - $25,410,740 $ -
Brokered certificate of deposits 9,337,295 - 9,337,295 -
Federal agency securities 5,312,124 - 5,312,124 -
$ - $40,060,159 $ -
Investments not categorized:
4M Liquid Asset Class 713,386
4M PLUS Class 486,366
First American Treasury Obligation Fund 1,270,659
Total investments $42,530,570
Fair Value Measurement Using
C. INVESTMENT RISKS
Custodial Credit Risk – Investments – For investments in securities, custodial credit risk is the risk that in
the event of failure of the counterparty to a transaction, the City will not be able to recover the value of its
investment securities that are in the possession of an outside party. Investments in investment pools and
money markets are not evidenced by securities that exist in physical or book entry form, and therefore are
not subject to custodial credit risk disclosures. The City’s investment policy requires its brokers be
licensed with the appropriate federal and state agencies. A minimum capital requirement of $5,000,000
and at least five years of operation is mandatory. Investments in securities are held by the City’s broker-
dealers. The securities at each broker-dealer are insured $500,000 through SIPC. Each broker-dealer has
provided additional protection by providing additional insurance. This insurance is subject to aggregate
limits applied to all of the broker-dealer’s accounts.
Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will adversely affect the fair
value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its
fair value to changes in market interest rates. The City’s policy to minimize interest rate risk includes
investing primarily in short-term securities and structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature
to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations.
Credit Risk – Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder
of the investment. The City’s policy to minimize credit risk includes limiting investing funds to those
allowable under Minnesota Statute 118A, annually appointing all financial institutions where investments
are held, and diversifying the investment portfolio. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a
nationally recognized statistical rating organization.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss that may be attributed to the
magnitude of a government’s investment in a single issuer. The City places no limit on the amount it may
invest in any one issuer. At December 31, 2024, no individual investments exceeded 5% of the City’s total
investment portfolio.
57
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 3 RECEIVABLES
A. LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
Significant receivable balances not expected to be collected within one year of December 31, 2024 are as
follows:
Property Special
Taxes Assessments Leases
Receivable Receivable Receivable Total
Major Funds:
General Fund $50,100 $ - $337,901 $388,001
Area and Unit Trunk - 799,688 - 799,688
MSA Construction - 1,544,193 - 1,544,193
Nonmajor Funds - 373,400 1,099,288 1,472,688
Total $50,100 $2,717,281 $1,437,189 $4,204,570
B. LEASES RECEIVABLE
The City leases a portion of its water towers for cellular tower antenna sites. These leases are non-
cancelable for a period of 5 years, with two to four renewal periods of 5 years each at the lessee's option.
The City considers the likelihood of these options being exercised to be greater than 50%. The agreements
call for monthly lease payments between $1,855 and $3,570, with increases of 4% annually or 7.5% upon
exercising renewal options. The lease receivables are measured at the present value of the future minimum
lease payments expected to be received during the lease term at a discount rate of 5% which is based on the
rate available to finance equipment over the same time periods.
The City leases space within its City Hall Complex to New Creations Child Care and Learning Center. The
lease expires June 30, 2029, however, the City has the option to terminate the lease with at least 12 months
written notice. The City considers the likelihood of cancelling the lease agreement to be less than 50%.
The agreement calls for monthly lease payments of $6,785, with annual increases of 3% through the end of
the lease term. There are no renewal options stated in the lease agreement. The lease receivable is
measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments expected to be received during the
lease term at a discount rate of 5%.
At December 31, 2024 the City recorded $1,583,577 in lease receivables and deferred inflows of resources
for these arrangements.
Total revenue recognized in relation to these leases is as follows:
2024
Amortization of lease-related deferred inflows:
Antenna leases $72,713
City Hall Complex lease 73,082
Total revenue recognized resulting from deferred inflow amortization 145,795
Interest revenue 83,077
Common area maintenance charges 28,095
Total revenue recognized in relation to leased assets $256,967
58
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 4 UNAVAILABLE REVENUE
Governmental funds report deferred inflows of resources in connection with receivables for revenues that are not
considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. At the end of the current fiscal year, the
various components of unavailable revenue reported in the governmental funds are as follows:
Property Special
Taxes Assessments
Receivable Receivable Total
Major Funds:
General Fund $109,829 ` $410 $110,239
Area and Unit Trunk - 896,694 896,694
MSA Construction - 1,606,186 1,606,186
Nonmajor Funds - 478,318 478,318
Total $109,829 $2,981,608 $3,091,437
59
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 5 CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 was as follows:
Beginning Ending
Balance* Increases Decreases Transfers Balance
Governmental activities:
Capital assets, not being depreciated:
Land $5,698,330 $33,000 $ - $ - $5,731,330
Wetland credits 49,042 - - - 49,042
Construction in progress 5,871,019 10,517,723 (8,575,362) (6,008,188) 1,805,192
Total capital assets, not being depreciated 11,618,391 10,550,723 (8,575,362) (6,008,188) 7,585,564
Capital assets, being depreciated:
Buildings 16,795,552 - - - 16,795,552
Equipment 10,867,225 872,574 (677,323) - 11,062,476
Land improvements 2,915,803 1,310,861 - - 4,226,664
Other equipment 161,713 - - - 161,713
Infrastructure 108,681,789 7,264,501 - - 115,946,290
Total capital assets, being depreciated 139,422,082 9,447,936 (677,323) - 148,192,695
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings 7,865,844 662,332 - - 8,528,176
Equipment 5,868,278 812,856 (480,627) - 6,200,507
Land improvements 1,239,650 154,364 - - 1,394,014
Other equipment 127,057 2,835 - - 129,892
Infrastructure 69,939,348 2,708,739 - - 72,648,087
Total accumulated depreciation 85,040,177 4,341,126 (480,627) - 88,900,676
Total capital assets being depreciated - net 54,381,905 5,106,810 (196,696) - 59,292,019
Governmental activities capital assets - net $66,000,296 $15,657,533 ($8,772,058) ($6,008,188) $66,877,583
Business-type activities:
Capital assets, not being depreciated:
Land $374,867 $ - $ - $ - $374,867
Construction in progress 4,040,557 2,119,226 (5,252,672) 6,008,188 6,915,299
Total capital assets, not being depreciated 4,415,424 2,119,226 (5,252,672) 6,008,188 7,290,166
Capital assets, being depreciated:
Machinery and shop equipment 669,366 220,272 (12,067) - 877,571
Water and sewer systems 70,342,718 5,252,674 - - 75,595,392
Total capital assets, being depreciated 71,012,084 5,472,946 (12,067) - 76,472,963
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Machinery and shop equipment 250,622 80,393 (12,067) - 318,948
Water and sewer systems 25,057,714 1,600,673 - - 26,658,387
Total accumulated depreciation 25,308,336 1,681,066 (12,067) - 26,977,335
Total capital assets being depreciated - net 45,703,748 3,791,880 - - 49,495,628
Business-type activities capital assets - net $50,119,172 $5,911,106 ($5,252,672) $6,008,188 $56,785,794
*As of January 1, 2024, the City reclassified certain capital assets and retitled certain capital asset categories to
better reflect the nature of its assets. This reclassification had no impact on total capital assets or accumulated
depreciation.
60
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the City as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government $1,047,300
Public safety 408,947
Public works 2,466,163
Culture and recreation 417,023
Conservation of natural resources 1,693
Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $4,341,126
Business-type activities:
Water $927,267
Sewer 753,799
Total depreciation expense - business-type activities $1,681,066
Note 6 LONG-TERM DEBT
The City issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major capital
facilities and equipment. City indebtedness at December 31, 2024 consisted of the following:
Final
Issue Maturity Interest Original Payable
Date Date Rate Issue 12/31/2024
Governmental activities:
General Obligation Bonds:
G.O. Bonds, Series 2015A 08/01/15 02/01/31 2.00% - 3.00% $3,095,000 $1,470,000
EDA Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2015B 10/01/15 04/01/36 2.00% - 3.00% 4,350,000 2,910,000
G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 11/23/16 02/01/27 2.00% 1,420,000 445,000
G.O. Bonds, Series 2018A 12/19/18 02/01/34 3.00% - 5.00% 6,915,000 5,225,000
G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A 07/08/20 02/01/35 2.00% - 4.00% 4,330,000 3,345,000
G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2021A 07/15/21 02/01/32 1.00% - 4.00% 1,815,000 1,480,000
Total General Obligation Bonds 21,925,000 14,875,000
Special Assessment Bonds:
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2014A 11/20/14 02/01/26 0.40% - 2.30% 2,645,000 195,000
Unamortized bond premiums 1,102,333 657,458
Unamortized bond discounts (38,362) (1,234)
Compensated absences payable N/A 1,178,755
Total Government Activities $25,633,971 $16,904,979
Business-Type Activities:
Direct Borrowings:
G.O. Water Revenue Note, Series 2024 (MPFA) 09/30/24 08/20/44 1.947% $15,996,190 $1,216,285
Compensated absences payable N/A 127,362
Total Business-Type Activities $15,996,190 $1,343,647
61
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
CHANGES IN LONG-TERM DEBT
The following is a schedule of changes in long-term debt for the year ended December 31, 2024:
Beginning Ending Due Within
Balance Additions Deletions Balance One Year
Governmental Activities:
Bonded debt:General obligation bonds $16,735,000 $ - $1,860,000 $14,875,000 $1,455,000
Special assessment bonds 415,000 - 220,000 195,000 160,000
Direct borrowings - capital note 35,475 - 35,475 - -
Unamortized bond premiums 734,628 - 77,170 657,458 -
Unamortized bond discounts (2,585) - (1,351) (1,234) -
Compensated Absences PayableCompensated absences payable* 815,278 363,477 - 1,178,755 826,030
Total governmental activities $18,732,796 $363,477 $2,191,294 $16,904,979 $2,441,030
Business-Type Activities:
Direct borrowings - MPFA note $ - $1,216,285 $ - $1,216,285 $349,190
Compensated absences payable* 79,049 48,313 - 127,362 80,238
Total business-type activities $79,049 $1,264,598 $ - $1,343,647 $429,428
* The change in compensated absences is presented as a net change.
DESCRIPTIONS OF LONG-TERM DEBT
General Obligation Bonds – the bonds were issued for improvements or projects which benefited the City as a whole
and, therefore, are repaid from ad valorem levies.
Special Assessment Bonds – the bonds were issued to finance various improvements and will be repaid primarily
from special assessments levied on the properties benefiting from the improvements. However, some issues are
partly financed by ad valorem levies.
Utility Revenue Bonds – the Bonds were issued to finance various improvements in the water fund and will be
repaid primarily from pledged revenues derived from the constructed assets.
Capital Note – the note was issued to fund the cost of the acquisition of capital equipment to be used by the North
Metro Telecommunications Commission in the operation of a cable communications system. The note was repaid
from franchise fee revenue.
Water Revenue Note – the note was issued to fund the construction of a water treatment plant and will be repaid
from pledged revenues derived from charges for services of the water fund. Note proceeds are received from the
Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (MPFA) on a reimbursement basis as the project progresses. The total amount
of note proceeds available to disburse to the City is $15,996,190.
The MPFA Bond Purchase and Project Loan Agreement defines Events of Default, including remedies if default
were to occur. Remedies may include the following: 1) an interest penalty, 2) withhold approval of any
disbursement request, 3) reject any pending application for financial assistance, 4) impose an immediate increase in
the interest rate on the loan by eliminating all interest rate discounts, and 5) demand immediate payment of all
outstanding principal and interest (to the extent permitted by law).
62
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
Future principal and interest payments required to retire long-term debt are as follows:
Years Ending
December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest
2025 $1,615,000 $444,190 $349,190 $18,231
2026 1,525,000 394,554 688,000 16,882
2027 1,540,000 341,433 179,095 3,487
2028 1,395,000 288,420 - -
2029 1,450,000 238,582 - -
2030-2034 6,630,000 610,943 - -
2035-2036 915,000 26,450 - -
Total $15,070,000 $2,344,572 $1,216,285 $38,600
Bonded Debt G.O. Water Revenue Note
Govermental Activities Business-Type Activities
DEFERRED AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES – BONDED DEBT
All long-term bonded indebtedness is backed by the full faith and credit of the City, including special assessment
and revenue bond issues. General Obligation bond issues are financed by ad valorem tax levies and special
assessment bond issues are partially financed by ad valorem tax levies in addition to special assessments levied
against the benefiting properties. When a bond issue to be financed partially or completely by ad valorem tax levies
is sold, specific annual amounts of such tax levies are stated in the bond resolution and the County Auditor is
notified and instructed to levy these taxes over the appropriate years. The future tax levies are subject to
cancellation when and if the City has provided alternative sources of financing. The City Council is required to levy
any additional taxes found necessary for full payment of principal and interest.
63
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
REVENUE PLEDGED
Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows:
Remaining Principal Pledged
Term of Principal and Interest Revenue
Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Pledge and Interest Paid Received
2007A G.O. TIF Bonds Infrastructure improvements Tax increment, MSA 2008 - 2024 $ - $285,775 $140,471
funding via transfers
2012A G.O. Bonds Infrastructure improvements 2013 - 2024 $ - $166,361 $ -
2013A Improvement Bonds Infrastructure improvements Special assessments 2014 - 2024 $ - $66,300 $ -
2014A Improvement Bonds Infrastructure improvements Special assessments 2015 - 2026 $198,048 $161,151 $124,165
2015A G.O. Bonds Infrastructure improvements Ad valorem taxes 2016 - 2031 $1,604,319 $258,713 $274,589
2015B EDA Lease Revenue Bonds Construction of a fire station Ad valorem taxes 2016 - 2036 $3,586,269 $302,538 $319,765
2016A Capital Note Cable communications equipment Franchise fees 2016 - 2024 $ - $36,185 $37,994
2016A Utility Revenue Bonds Water infrastructure improvements 2017 - 2027 $458,450 $155,350 $155,350
2018A G.O. Bonds Infrastructure improvements 2019-2034 $6,178,869 $641,413 $538,230
2020A G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds Infrastructure improvements 2021-2035 $3,804,100 $344,500 $344,500
2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds Infrastructure improvements 2021-2032 $1,584,517 $199,695 $207,895
2024 G.O. Water Revenue Note (MPFA) Water treatment plant 2025-2044 $1,254,885 $ - $ -
Water fund charges
for services
Ad valorem taxes
Trunk utility charges
via transfers
Ad valorem taxes,
trunk utility charges,
special assessments
Ad valorem taxes,
special assessments
Trunk utility charges
via transfers
Current YearRevenue Pledged
64
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 7 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – PERA
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans
administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). Plan provisions are
established and administered according to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353, 353D, 353E, 353G and 356.
Minnesota Statutes chapter 356 defines each plan’s financial reporting requirements. PERA’s defined
benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
1. General Employees Retirement Plan (General Plan)
Membership in the General Plan includes employees of counties, cities, townships, schools in non-
certified positions, and other governmental entities whose revenues are derived from taxation, fees, or
assessments. Plan membership is required for any employee who is expected to earn more than $425
in a month, unless the employee meets exclusion criteria.
2. Public Employees Police and Fire Retirement Plan (Police and Fire Plan)
Membership in the Police and Fire Plan includes full-time, licensed police officers and firefighters who
meet the membership criteria defined in Minnesota Statutes section 353.64 and who are not earning
service credit in any other PERA retirement plan or local relief association for the same service.
Employers can provide Police and Fire Plan coverage for part-time positions and certain other public
safety positions by submitting a resolution adopted by the entity’s governing body. The resolution
must state that the position meets plan requirements.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute
and can only be modified by the state legislature. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to
benefits but are not receiving them yet, are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated
their public service. When a member is “vested,” they have earned enough service credit to receive a
lifetime monthly benefit after leaving public service and reaching an eligible retirement age. Members who
retire at or over their Social Security full retirement age with at least one year of service qualify for a
retirement benefit.
1. General Employees Plan Benefits
The General Employees Plan requires three years of service to vest. Benefits are based on a member’s
highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at
termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for General Plan members.
Members hired prior to July 1, 1989 receive the higher of the Step or Level formulas. Only the Level
formula is used for members hired after June 30, 1989. Under the Step formula, General Plan
members receive 1.2% of the highest average salary for each of the first ten years of service and 1.7%
for each additional year. Under the Level formula, General Plan members receive 1.7% of the highest
average salary for all years of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full retirement
benefit is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. Members
can receive a reduced requirement benefit as early as age 55 if they have three or more years of
service. Early retirement benefits are reduced by 0.25% for each month under age 65. Members with
30 or more years of service can retire at any age with a reduction of 0.25% for each month the member
is younger than age 62. The Level formula allows General Plan members to receive a full retirement
benefit at age 65 if they were first hired before July 1, 1989 or at age 66 if they were hired on or after
July 1, 1989. Early retirement begins at age 55 with an actuarial reduction applied to the benefit.
65
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. The postretirement increase is equal
to 50% of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) announced by the SSA, with a minimum increase of
at least 1% and a maximum of 1.5%. The 2024 annual increase was 1.5%. Recipients that have been
receiving the annuity or benefit for at least a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the
increase will receive the full increase. Recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least one
month but less than a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a
prorated increase.
2. Police and Fire Plan Benefits
Benefits for Police and Fire Plan members hired before July 1, 2010, are vested after three years of
service. Members hired on or after July 1, 2010, are 50% vested after five years and 100% vested after
ten years. After five years, vesting increases by 10% each full year of service until members are 100%
vested after ten years. Police and Fire Plan members receive a full retirement benefit when they are
age 55 and vested, or when their age plus their years of service equals 90 or greater if they were first
hired before July 1, 1989. Early retirement starts at age 50, and early retirement benefits are reduced
by 0.417% each month members are younger than age 55.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. The postretirement increase is fixed
at 1%. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least 36 months as of the June
30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. Recipients receiving the
annuity or benefit for at least 25 months but less than 36 months as of the June 30 before the effective
date of the increase will receive a prorated increase.
C. CONTRIBUTIONS
Minnesota Statutes Chapters 353, 353E, 353G, and 356 set the rates for employer and employee
contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature.
1. General Employees Fund Contributions
General Plan members were required to contribute 6.50% of their annual covered salary in fiscal year
2024 and the City was required to contribute 7.50% for General Plan members. The City’s
contributions to the General Employees Fund for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $321,519.
The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
2. Police and Fire Fund Contributions
Police and Fire Plan members were required to contribute 11.80% of their annual covered salary in
fiscal year 2024 and the City was required to contribute 17.70% for Police and Fire Plan members.
The City’s contributions to the Police and Fire Fund for the year ended December 31, 2024 were
$555,870. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
66
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
D. PENSION COSTS
1. General Employees Fund Pension Costs
At December 31, 2024, the City reported a liability of $1,802,947 for its proportionate share of the
General Employee’s Fund net pension liability. The City’s net pension liability reflected a reduction
due to the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million. The State of Minnesota is considered a
non-employer contributing entity and the state’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding
situation. The State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the
City totaled $46,621.
The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2024, and the total pension liability used to
calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s
proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by PERA during
the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024,
relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA’s participating employers. The
City’s proportionate share was 0.0488% at the end of the measurement period and 0.0505% for the
beginning of the period.
City's proportionate share of the net pension liability $1,802,947
State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net
pension liability associated with the City 46,621
Total $1,849,568
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the City recognized pension expense of $299,719 for its
proportionate share of the General Plan’s pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an
additional $1,250 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of
Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million to the General Employees Fund.
During the plan year ended June 30, 2024, the State of Minnesota contributed $170.1 million to the
General Employees Fund. The State of Minnesota is not included as a non-employer contributing
entity in the General Employees Plan pension allocation schedules for the $170.1 million in direct state
aid because this contribution was not considered to meet the definition of a special funding situation.
The City recognized $83,009 for the year ended December 31, 2024 as revenue and an offsetting
reduction of net pension liability for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s on-behalf
contributions to the General Employees Fund.
67
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
At December 31, 2024, the City reported General Employees Fund deferred outflows of resources and
deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and
actual economic experience $169,338 $ -
Changes in actuarial assumptions 8,647 682,402
Net difference between projected and actual
earnings on pension plan investments - 540,275
Changes in proportion 304,451 96,927
Employer contributions
subsequent to the measurement date 161,205 -
Total $643,641 $1,319,604
The $161,205 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City
contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension
liability in the year ended December 31, 2025. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and
inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Year Ended Pension
December 31, Expense
2025 ($423,462)
2026 (22,302)
2027 (253,215)
2028 (138,189)
2029 -
Thereafter -
2. Police and Fire Fund Pension Costs
At December 31, 2024, the City reported a liability of $2,968,216 for its proportionate share of the
Police and Fire Fund’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30,
2024 and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an
actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability was based
on the City’s contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll
paid dates from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, relative to the total employer contributions
received from all of PERA’s participating employers. The City’s proportionate share was 0.2256% at
the end of the measurement period and 0.2303% for the beginning of the period.
68
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
The State of Minnesota contributed $37.4 million to the Police and Fire Fund during the plan fiscal
year ended June 30, 2024. The contribution consisted of $9 million in direct state aid that meets the
definition of a special funding situation, additional one-time direct state aid contribution of $19.4
million, and $9 million in supplemental state aid that does not meet the definition of a special funding
situation. Additionally, $9 million supplemental state aid was paid on October 1, 2024. Thereafter, by
October 1 of each year, the state will pay $9 million to the Police and Fire Fund until full funding is
reached or July 1, 2048, whichever is earlier. The $9 million in supplemental state aid will continue
until the fund is 90% funded, or until the State Patrol Plan (administered by the Minnesota State
Retirement System) is 90% funded, whichever occurs later. The State of Minnesota’s proportionate
share of the net pension liability associated with the City totaled $113,147.
City's proportionate share of the net pension liability $2,968,216
State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net
pension liability associated with the City 113,147
Total $3,081,363
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the City recognized pension expense of $497,222 for its
proportionate share of the Police and Fire Plan’s pension expense. The City recognized an additional
$10,987 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s
contribution of $9 million to the Police and Fire Fund special funding situation.
The State of Minnesota is not included as a non-employer contributing entity in the Police and Fire
Pension Plan pension allocation schedules for the $28.4 million in supplemental state aid, because this
contribution was not considered to meet the definition of a special funding situation. The City
recognized $64,075 for the year ended December 31, 2024 as revenue and an offsetting reduction of
net pension liability for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s on-behalf contributions to
the Police and Fire Fund.
At December 31, 2024, the City reported Police and Fire Fund deferred outflows of resources and
deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and
actual economic experience $1,153,122 $ -
Changes in actuarial assumptions 3,229,476 4,370,147
Net difference between projected and actual
earnings on pension plan investments - 946,573
Changes in proportion 100,353 230,876
Employer contributions subsequent
to the measurement date 265,985 -
Total $4,748,936 $5,547,596
69
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
The $265,985 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City
contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension
liability in the year ended December 31, 2025. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and
inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Year Ended Pension
December 31, Expense
2025 ($194,749)
2026 719,420
2027 (453,786)
2028 (1,172,082)
2029 36,552
Thereafter -
The net pension liability will be liquidated by the general, water, sewer, and storm water funds.
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2024 actuarial valuation was determined using the entry-age
normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.25% per year
Investment Rate of Return 7.00%
The long-term investment rate of return is based on a review of inflation and investment return assumptions
from a number of national investment consulting firms. The review provided a range of investment return
rates considered reasonable by the actuary. An investment return of 7.00% is within that range.
Benefit increases after retirement are assumed to be 1.25% for the General Plan and 1.00% for the Police
and Fire Plan.
Salary growth assumptions in the General Plan range in annual increments from 10.25% after one year of
service to 3.0% after 27 years of service. In the Police and Fire Plan, salary growth assumptions range in
annual increments from 11.75% after one year of service to 3.0% after 24 years of service.
Mortality rates for the General Plan were based on the Pub-2010 General Employee Mortality Table.
Mortality rates for the Police and Fire Plan were based on the Pub-2010 Public Safety Employee Mortality
tables. The tables are adjusted slightly to fit PERA’s experience.
Actuarial assumptions for the General Plan are reviewed every four years. The General Plan was last
reviewed in 2022. The assumption changes were adopted by the board and became effective with the July
1, 2023 actuarial valuation. The Police and Fire Plan was reviewed in 2024. PERA anticipates the
experience study will be approved by the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement and become
effective with the July 1, 2025 actuarial valuation.
70
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
The following changes in actuarial assumptions and plan provisions occurred in 2024:
General Employees Fund
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
Rates of merit and seniority were adjusted, resulting in slightly higher rates.
Assumed rates of retirement were adjusted as follows: increase the rate of assumed unreduced
retirements, slight adjustments to Rule of 90 retirement rates, and slight adjustments to early retirement
rates for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members.
Minor increase in assumed withdrawals for males and females.
Lower rates of disability.
Continued use of Pub-2010 general mortality table with slight rate adjustments as recommended in the
most recent experience study.
Minor changes to form of payment assumptions for male and female retirees.
Minor changes to assumptions made with respect to missing participant data.
Changes in Plan Provisions:
The workers’ compensation offset for disability benefits was eliminated. The actuarial equivalent
factors updated to reflect the changes in assumptions.
Police and Fire Fund
Changes in Plan Provisions:
The State contribution of $9.0 million per year will continue until the earlier of 1) both the Police &
Fire Plan and the State Patrol Retirement Fund attain 90 percent funded status for three consecutive
years (on an actuarial value of assets basis) or 2) July 1, 2048. The contribution was previously due to
expire after attaining a 90 percent funded status for one year.
The additional $9.0 million contribution will continue until the Police & Fire Plan is fully funded for a
minimum of three consecutive years on an actuarial value of assets basis, or July 1, 2048, whichever is
earlier. This contribution was previously due to expire upon attainment of fully funded status on an
actuarial value of assets basis for one year (or July 1, 2048 if earlier).
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the
reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return using a building-block method in
which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class.
These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected
future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of
geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:
Target Long-Term Expected
Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return
Domestic equity 33.5%5.10%
International equity 16.5%5.30%
Fixed income 25.0%0.75%
Private markets 25.0%5.90%
Totals 100%
71
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
F. DISCOUNT RATE
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2024 was 7.00%. The projection of cash
flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers
will be made at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on these assumptions, the fiduciary net position of
the General Plan and Police and Fire Plan were projected to be available to make all projected future
benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan
investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY
The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability, calculated using the
discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the City’s proportionate share of the net
pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate one percentage point lower (6.00%) or
one percentage point higher (8.00%) than the current discount rate:
1% Decrease in Current 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
Proportionate share of the
General Plan net pension liability $3,937,925 $1,802,947 $46,732
Proportionate share of the Police and
Fire Plan net pension liability $7,014,474 $2,968,216 ($354,609)
H. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a separately-issued
PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That
report may be obtained at www.mnpera.org.
I. PENSION EXPENSE
Pension expense recognized by the City for the year ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:
General Plan $300,969
Police and Fire Plan 508,209
Fire Relief (Note 8)(2,968)
Total $806,210
72
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 8 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN – FIRE DIVISION
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The Lino Lakes Public Safety Department – Fire Division participates in the Statewide Volunteer
Firefighter Retirement Plan (accounted for in the Volunteer Firefighter Fund), an agent multiple-employer
lump-sum defined benefit pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of
Minnesota (PERA). The Volunteer Firefighter Plan covers volunteer firefighters of municipal fire
departments or independent nonprofit firefighting corporations that have elected to join the plan. As of
December 31, 2023 (measurement date), the plan covered 19 active firefighters and two vested terminated
firefighters whose pension benefits are deferred. The plan is established and administered in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353G.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
The Volunteer Firefighter Plan provides retirement, death, and supplemental benefits to covered firefighters
and survivors. Benefits are paid based on the number of years of service multiplied by a benefit level
approved by the City. Members are eligible for a lump-sum retirement benefit at 50 years of age with five
years of service. Plan provisions include a pro-rated vesting schedule that increases from 5 years at 40%
through 20 years at 100%.
C. CONTRIBUTIONS
The Volunteer Firefighter Plan is funded by fire state aid, investment earnings and, if necessary, employer
contributions as specified in Minnesota Statutes, and voluntary City contributions. The State of Minnesota
contributed $170,000 in fire state aid to the plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Required
employer contributions are calculated annually based on statutory provisions. The City’s statutorily-
required contributions to the Volunteer Firefighter Fund for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $0.
The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute, if applicable.
73
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
D. PENSION COSTS
As of December 31, 2024, the City reported a net pension asset of $695,585 for the Volunteer Firefighter
Fund. The net pension asset was measured as of December 31, 2023. The total pension liability used to
calculate the net pension asset in accordance with GASB 68 was determined by PERA applying an
actuarial formula to specific census data certified by the fire department. The following table presents the
changes in the net pension asset during the year:
Plan
Total Fiduciary Net
Pension Net Pension
Liability Position Asset
(a)(b)(b-a)
Beginning balance December 31, 2022 $538,056 $984,693 $446,637
Changes for the year:
Service cost 62,261 - (62,261)
Interest on pension liability 35,283 - (35,283)
Actuarial experience (gains) / losses (17,070) - 17,070
Projected investment earnings - 63,446 63,446
Asset (gain) loss - 95,976 95,976
Contributions - employer - - -
Contributions - State of MN - 170,000 170,000
Benefit payments (24,520) (24,520) -
PERA administrative fee - - -
Net changes 55,954 304,902 248,948
Balance end of year December 31, 2023 $594,010 $1,289,595 $695,585
There were no benefit provision changes during the measurement period.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the City recognized pension expense of ($2,968).
At December 31, 2024, the City reported deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
from the following sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Difference between projected and
actual investment earnings $25,167 $ -
Differences between expected and
actual economic experience 23,741 39,254
Total $48,908 $39,254
74
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in
pension expense as follows:
Year Ended Pension
December 31, Expense
2025 ($3,768)
2026 24,712
2027 19,724
2028 (20,509)
2029 (1,313)
Thereafter (9,192)
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The total pension liability at December 31, 2023 was determined using the entry age normal actuarial cost
method and the following actuarial assumptions:
Retirement eligibility at the later of age 50 or 20 years of service
Investment rate of return of 6.0%
Inflation rate of 3.0%
There were no changes in actuarial assumptions in 2023.
F. DISCOUNT RATE
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.0%. The projection of cash flows used to
determine the discount rate assumed that contributions to the Volunteer Firefighter Fund will be made at a
rate equal to the actuarially determined contribution rate. Based on these assumptions, the pension plan’s
fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current
plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to
all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY
The following presents the City’s net pension asset for the Volunteer Firefighter Fund, calculated using the
assumed discount rate as well as what the City’s net pension asset would be if it were calculated using a
discount rate 1% lower or 1% higher than the current discount rate:
1% Decrease in Current 1% Increase in
Discount Rate (5.0%) Discount Rate (6.0%) Discount Rate (7.0%)
Net pension asset $661,372 $695,585 $728,343
75
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
H. PLAN INVESTMENTS
1. Investment Policy
The Minnesota State Board of Investment (SBI) is established by Article XI of the Minnesota
Constitution to invest all state funds. Its membership as specified in the Constitution is comprised of
the governor (who is designated as chair of the board), state auditor, secretary of state and state
attorney general.
All investments undertaken by the SBI are governed by the prudent person rule and other standards
codified in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 11A and Chapter 353G.
Within the requirements defined by state law, the SBI, with assistance of the SBI staff and the
Investment Advisory Council, establishes investment policy for all funds under its control. These
investment policies are tailored to the particular needs of each fund and specify investment objectives,
risk tolerance, asset allocation, investment management structure and specific performance standards.
Studies guide the on-going management of the funds and are updated periodically.
2. Asset Allocation
To match the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the SBI maintains a strategic asset allocation
for the Volunteer Firefighter Plan that includes allocations to domestic equity, international equity,
bonds and cash equivalents. The long-term target asset allocation and long-term expected real rate of
return is the following:
Target Long-Term Expected
Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return
Domestic Stocks 35%5.10%
International Stocks 15%5.30%
Bonds 45%0.75%
Cash 5%0.00%
100%
The 6% long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a
building-block method. Best estimates for expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of
inflation) were developed for each asset class using both long-term historical returns and long-term
capital market expectations from a number of investment management and consulting organizations.
The asset class estimates and the target allocations were then combined to produce a geometric, long-
term expected real rate of return for the portfolio. Inflation expectations were applied to derive the
nominal rate of return for the portfolio.
3. Description of Significant Investment Policy Changes During the Year
The SBI made no significant changes to their investment policy during fiscal year 2023 for the
Volunteer Firefighter Fund.
I. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
Detailed information about the Volunteer Firefighter Fund’s fiduciary net position is available in a
separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary
information. That report may be obtained at www.mnpera.org.
76
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 9 POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (OPEB)
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
In addition to providing the pension benefits described in Notes 7 and 8, the City provides post-
employment health care benefits, as defined in paragraph B, through its group health insurance plan (the
plan). The plan is a single-employer defined benefit OPEB plan administered by the City. The authority to
provide these benefits is established in Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.61 Subd. 2a and 299A.465. The
benefits, benefit levels, employee contributions and employer contributions are governed by the City and
can be amended by the City through its personnel manual and collective bargaining agreements with
employee groups. No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB
Statement No. 75. The plan does not issue a stand-alone financial report.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
The City is required by State Statute to allow retirees to continue participation in the City’s group health
insurance plan if the individual terminates service with the City through service retirement or disability
retirement. Active employees, who retire from the City when over age 50 and with 20 years of service,
may continue coverage with respect to both themselves and their eligible dependent(s) under the City’s
health benefits program until age 65.
The City provides health coverage for peace officers or firefighters disabled or killed in the line of duty in
accordance with Minnesota Statute 299A.465. The amount of coverage provided is equal to the employer
portion of health insurance premiums that would have otherwise been paid if the officer or firefighter was
an active employee.
All health care coverage is provided through the City’s group health insurance plans. The retiree is
required to pay 100% of their premium cost for the City-sponsored group health insurance plan in which
they participate. The premium is a blended rate determined on the entire active and retiree population.
Since the projected claims costs for retirees exceed the blended premium paid by retirees, the retirees are
receiving an implicit rate subsidy (benefit). The coverage levels are the same as those afforded to active
employees. Upon a retiree reaching age 65, Medicare becomes the primary insurer and the City’s plan
becomes secondary.
C. PARTICIPANTS
As of the January 1, 2023 actuarial valuation, participants of the plan consisted of:
Active employees 65
Inactive employees or beneficiaries
currently receiving benefits 5
Total 70
77
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
D. TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY AND CHANGES IN TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY
The City’s total OPEB liability of $841,031 was measured as of December 31, 2024 and was determined by
an actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2023. Changes in the total OPEB liability during 2024 were:
Balance - beginning of year $802,063
Changes for the year:
Service cost 63,419
Interest 33,911
Changes of benefit terms -
Differences between expected and actual experience -
Changes in assumptions (22,573)
Benefit payments (35,789)
Net changes 38,968
Balance - end of year $841,031
The OPEB liability will be liquidated by the general, rookery activity center, water, sewer, and storm water
funds. The current portion of the OPEB liability is not material to the financial statements and therefore, is
not presented separately from the amount due in more than one year on the statement of net position.
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER INPUTS
The total OPEB liability in the January 1, 2023 actuarial valuation was determined using the following
actuarial assumptions and other inputs, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise
specified:
Inflation 3.00%
Salary increases 3.00%
Discount rate 4.28%
Investment rate of return N/A
Healthcare cost trend rates 6.00% for 2024, decreasing 0.25% per year to
an ultimate rate of 5.00% for 2028 and beyond
Retirees' share of benefit-related costs 100% Since the plan is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis, both the discount rate and the investment rate of return
were based on the 20-year AA rated municipal bond rate as of December 31, 2024, obtained from
https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/fixed-income/sp-municipal-bond-20-year-high-grade-rate-
index/#overview.
Pre-retirement mortality rates were based on the RP-2014 Total Dataset Mortality with Improvement Scale
MP-2021. Post-retirement, disability retirement, and survivor retirement mortality rates were based on the
RP-2014 White Collar Mortality with Improvement Scale MP-2021.
Based on past experience of the plan, 50% of future retirees are assumed to continue medical coverage until
age 65. 15% of future pre-Medicare retirees are assumed to select spousal coverage. No spousal coverage is
assumed for other future retirees. 43% of police/fire employees are assumed to retire before the age of 60,
25% at age 60, and the balance at age 65. 5% of other City employees are assumed to retire before the age
of 60, 8% at age 60, and the balance at age 65.
78
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
F. SENSITIVITY OF THE TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY TO CHANGES IN THE DISCOUNT RATE
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability
would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1% lower (3.28%) or 1% higher (5.28%) than the
current discount rate:
1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase
3.28%4.28%5.28%
Total OPEB liability $924,919 $841,031 $765,986
G. SENSITIVITY OF THE TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY TO CHANGES IN THE HEALTHCARE
COST TREND RATES
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability
would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1% lower (5% decreasing to 4%) or
1% higher (7% decreasing to 6%) than the current healthcare cost trend rates:
Healthcare Cost
1% Decrease Trend Rates 1% Increase
(5% decreasing to 4%)(6% decreasing to 5%) (7% decreasing to 6%)
Total OPEB liability $728,041 $841,031 $977,302
H. OPEB EXPENSE AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS AND INFLOWS OF RESOURCES RELATED
TO OPEB
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the City recognized $73,904 of OPEB expense. At December 31,
2024, the City reported deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following
sources:
Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected
and actual experience $214,521 $290,365
Changes in assumptions 83,390 79,214
Total $297,911 $369,579
Deferred outflows and inflows of resources relate almost exclusively to the public safety function, and
therefore, have been allocated entirely to governmental activities.
79
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in
OPEB expense as follows:
Year Ended OPEB
December 31,Expense
2025 ($22,346)
2026 (22,346)
2027 (22,346)
2028 (22,346)
2029 (22,346)
Thereafter 40,062
($71,668)
Note 10 STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY
A. DEFICIT FUND BALANCES
Deficit fund balances at December 31, 2024 are as follows:
Fund Balance
Deficit Future Funding Source
Major Funds:
Capital Equipment Replacement ($281,116) Property taxes
Nonmajor Funds:
Tax Increment Financing 1-11 (1,296,370) Tax increment collections
Comp Plan Update (98,524) Transfer from General Fund
2024 Street Reconstruction (218,947) Bond proceeds
B. EXPENDITURES IN EXCESS OF BUDGET
The following is a listing of departments within the General Fund that exceeded budget appropriations:
Final
Budget Actual Overage
General government:
Elections $49,000 $78,844 $29,844
Finance 748,840 846,203 97,363
Legal consultants 138,000 174,203 36,203
Engineering 97,463 101,244 3,781
Public safety:
Fire 1,094,025 1,185,685 91,660
Public works:
Fleet 704,061 770,543 66,482
Conservation of natural resources:
Forestry 84,515 129,394 44,879
80
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 11 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES
Short-term advances to funds that have insufficient cash balances are classified as advances to/from other funds.
Long-term interfund loans are classified as interfund loan receivable/payable. A summary of interfund receivables
and payables at December 31, 2024 is as follows:
Receivable Payable
Short-term advances:
Nonmajor Funds:
Closed Bond $50,299
Pavement Management 151,701 -
Comp Plan Update - 50,299
2024 Street Reconstruction - 151,701
$202,000 $202,000
Long-term interfund loans:
Major Funds:
Capital Equipment Replacement $ - $1,809,108
Sewer Fund 2,368,218 -
Nonmajor Funds:
Building and Facilities 738,060 -
Tax Increment Financing 1-11 - 1,297,170
$3,106,278 $3,106,278
Note 12 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
Individual fund transfers for fiscal year 2024 are as follows:
Transfer In Transfer Out
Major Funds:
General Fund $20,000 $286,590
G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2016B 1,728,204 -
Capital Equipment Replacement 150,000 -
Area and Unit Trunk 1,818,191 1,833,379
MSA Construction 232,529 140,471
Water Fund - 2,024,951
Storm Water - 55,507
Nonmajor governmental funds 2,471,599 2,079,625
Total $6,420,523 $6,420,523
During 2024, transfers were made to provide funding for capital improvement projects and capital outlay in
accordance with the City’s Five-Year Financial Plan. Transfers were also made to relieve deficit fund balance,
provide resources for debt service payments, and to allocate financial resources to funds that received benefit from
services provided by another fund. These transfers are routine and consistent with past practices.
81
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 13 FUND BALANCE
At December 31, 2024, a summary of the governmental fund balance classifications is as follows:
The Rookery Capital Other
General Activity Equipment Area and MSA Governmental
Fund Center Replacement Unit Trunk Construction Funds Total
Nonspendable:
Prepaid items $557,155 $56,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $613,505
Corpus of permanent fund - - - - - 100,000 100,000
Total nonspendable 557,155 56,350 - - - 100,000 713,505
Restricted for:
Debt service - - - - - 3,779,535 3,779,535
Park improvements - - - - - 1,263,854 1,263,854
Economic development - - - - - 225,000 225,000
Local affordable housing - - - - - 89,644 89,644
Blue Heron Days - - - - - 14,657 14,657
Narcotics & forfeiture funds - - - - - 87,875 87,875
K-9 Unit purposes - - - - - 5,041 5,041
Public safety aid - - - - - 508,218 508,218
Tax increment purposes - - - - - 424,610 424,610
Environmental purposes - - - - - 42,924 42,924
Total restricted - - - - - 6,441,358 6,441,358
Committed for:
Veteran's Memorial 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
Fire department gear 17,500 - - - - - 17,500
Rookery activity center - 21,006 - - - - 21,006
Economic development - - - - - 33,762 33,762
Cable TV and
communications purposes - - - - - 266,661 266,661
Total committed 67,500 21,006 - - - 300,423 388,929
Assigned for:
Capital improvements - - - 10,419,643 4,283,196 7,567,121 22,269,960
Unassigned 8,931,762 - (281,116) - - (1,613,841) 7,036,805
Total fund balance $9,556,417 $77,356 ($281,116) $10,419,643 $4,283,196 $12,795,061 $36,850,557
82
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 14 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The City is the administrating authority for three tax increment districts. The City’s tax increment districts are
subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of
tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management has indicated that they are not aware of
any instances of noncompliance which could have a material effect on the financial statements.
The following table reflects values at December 31, 2024:
TIF 1-11
Legacy at TIF 1-12
Woods Clearwater TIF 1-13
Edge Creek Lyngblomsten
Authorizing law M.S. 469 M.S. 469 M.S. 469
Year established 2005 2017 2019
Final year of district 2031 2026 2030
Net tax capacity:
Original $15,468 $21,416 $14,101
Current 497,507 760,670 560,607
Captured - retained $482,039 $739,254 $546,506
The City provides tax abatements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.174 to 469.1794 (Tax Increment Financing)
through a pay-as-you-go note program. Tax increment financing (TIF) can be used to encourage private
development, redevelopment, renovation and renewal, growth in low to moderate income housing, and economic
development within the City. TIF captures the increase in tax capacity and property taxes from development or
redevelopment to provide funding for the related project.
Tax increment revenue from TIF District 1-11 was used to finance debt service payments on the G.O. Improvement
Bonds of 2016B. The bonds matured in 2021. Future tax increment collections will eliminate the deficit in TIF
Fund 1-11.
TIF District 1-12 had a pay-as-you-go revenue note. Tax Increment Revenue Note Series 2017 was issued in the
principal sum of $1,200,000 and was payable solely from available tax increments. Current year payments on the
note totaled $94,040 and the outstanding balance at December 31, 2024 was $0.
TIF District 1-13 has an outstanding pay-as-you-go revenue note. The Tax Increment Revenue Note was issued in
the principal sum of $3,656,000. The note is not a general obligation of the City and is payable solely from
available tax increments. Accordingly, the note is not reflected in the financial statements of the City. Principal
payments are due February 1st and August 1st and are equal to 95% of the tax increment revenues collected in the
preceding six months. Current year payments on the note totaled $159,511 and the outstanding balance as of
December 31, 2024 was $3,496,489.
83
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 15 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
A. LITIGATION
The City has been named in a lawsuit pertaining to development. The matter is in active discovery. The
City denies any liability and is defending its interests in the litigation. At this time, the outcome or any
potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated, although any potential loss is expected to be covered by
insurance.
B. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS
The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants.
The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and
conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any
disallowed claims resulting from such audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in
the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the
financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the
City at December 31, 2024.
C. COMMITTED CONTRACTS
At December 31, 2024, the City had commitments of $25,179,862 for uncompleted construction contracts.
Note 16 RISK MANAGEMENT
The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets, errors and
omissions, injuries to employees and natural disasters.
Workers compensation coverage is provided through a pooled self-insurance program through the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). The City pays an annual premium to LMCIT. The City is subject to
supplemental assessments if deemed necessary by the LMCIT. The LMCIT reinsures through Workers
Compensation Reinsurance Association (WCRA) as required by law. For workers compensation, the City is not
subject to a deductible. The City’s workers compensation coverage is retrospectively rated. With this type of
coverage, final premiums are determined after loss experience is known. The amount of premium adjustment, if
any, is considered immaterial and not recorded until received or paid.
Property and casualty insurance is provided through a pooled self-insurance program through the LMCIT. The City
pays an annual premium to the LMCIT. The City is subject to supplemental assessments if deemed necessary by the
LMCIT. The LMCIT reinsures through commercial companies for claims in excess of various amounts. The City
retains risk for the deductible portion of the insurance policies and for any exclusions from the insurance policies.
These amounts are considered immaterial to the financial statements.
The City continues to carry commercial insurance for all other risks of loss, including disability and employee health
insurance.
There were no significant reductions in insurance from the previous year or settlements in excess of insurance
coverage for any of the past three fiscal years.
84
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2024
Note 17 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Governmental Accounting Standards Boards (GASB) recently approved the following statements which were
not implemented for these financial statements:
Statement No. 102 Certain Risk Disclosures. The provisions of this Statement are effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2024.
Statement No. 103 Financial Reporting Model Improvements. The provisions of this Statement are
effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2025.
Statement No. 104 Disclosure of Certain Capital Assets. The provisions of this Statement are effective for
Reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2025.
The effect these standards may have on future financial statements is not determinable at this time.
85
- This page intentionally left blank -
86
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
87
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 1 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Revenues:
General propery taxes:
Current and delinquent $10,424,606 $10,424,606 $10,394,882 ($29,724)
Penalties and interest 5,000 5,000 4,285 (715)
Total general property taxes 10,429,606 10,429,606 10,399,167 (30,439)
Other taxes 185,000 185,000 133,969 (51,031)
Licenses and permits:
Business 72,225 72,225 81,533 9,308
Non-business 1,055,190 1,055,190 1,062,454 7,264
Total licenses and permits 1,127,415 1,127,415 1,143,987 16,572
Special assessments - - 382 382
Intergovernmental:
Federal:
OTS grant 25,000 25,000 98,889 73,889
State:
Police state aid 260,000 260,000 341,688 81,688
Fire state aid 21,705 21,705 192,547 170,842
MSA maintenance 275,000 275,000 294,114 19,114
Other 23,500 23,500 52,995 29,495
County solid waste grant 87,417 87,417 77,429 (9,988)
Total intergovernmental 692,622 692,622 1,057,662 365,040
Charges for services:
General government 246,525 246,525 300,282 53,757
Public safety 190,800 190,800 243,968 53,168
Public works 14,000 14,000 8,459 (5,541)
Culture and recreation 5,000 5,000 5,171 171
Total charges for services 456,325 456,325 557,880 101,555
Fines and forfeits 76,000 76,000 96,282 20,282
Investment earnings 30,000 30,000 301,634 271,634
Miscellaneous:
Refunds and reimbursements - - 32,854 32,854
Other 2,000 2,000 2,364 364
Total miscellaneous 2,000 2,000 35,218 33,218
Total revenues 12,998,968 12,998,968 13,726,181 727,213
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
88
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 2 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Expenditures:
General government:
Mayor and city council:
Current:
Personal services 52,734 52,734 52,584 150
Supplies - - 19 (19)
Other services and charges 30,390 30,390 25,788 4,602
Contractual services 26,150 26,150 12,569 13,581
Total mayor and city council 109,274 109,274 90,960 18,314
Administration:
Current:
Personal services 644,984 644,984 595,416 49,568
Other services and charges 34,980 34,980 35,773 (793)
Contractual services 32,800 32,800 60,772 (27,972)
Total administration 712,764 712,764 691,961 20,803
Elections:
Current:
Personal services 41,300 41,300 73,967 (32,667)
Supplies 1,000 1,000 2,025 (1,025)
Other services and charges 200 200 504 (304)
Contractual services 6,500 6,500 2,348 4,152
Total elections 49,000 49,000 78,844 (29,844)
Charter commission:
Current:
Other services and charges 8,920 8,920 167 8,753
Finance:
Current:
Personal services 327,030 327,030 326,389 641
Supplies 1,000 1,000 3,781 (2,781)
Other services and charges 319,410 319,410 414,368 (94,958)
Contractual services 101,400 101,400 101,665 (265)
Total finance 748,840 748,840 846,203 (97,363)
Legal consultants:
Current:
Other services and charges 138,000 138,000 174,203 (36,203)
Planning and zoning:
Current:
Personal services 132,079 132,079 131,356 723
Other services and charges 16,450 16,450 9,906 6,544
Contractual services 33,000 33,000 8,874 24,126
Total planning and zoning commission 181,529 181,529 150,136 31,393
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
89
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 3 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Expenditures: (continued)
General government: (continued)
Engineering:
Current:
Other services and charges 97,463 97,463 101,244 (3,781)
Total engineering 97,463 97,463 101,244 (3,781)
Government buildings:
Current:
Personal services 108,471 108,471 81,006 27,465
Supplies 47,400 47,400 42,271 5,129
Other services and charges 444,810 444,810 423,756 21,054
Contractual services 23,400 23,400 37,711 (14,311)
Total government buildings 624,081 624,081 584,744 39,337
Total general government 2,669,871 2,669,871 2,718,462 (48,591)
Public safety:
Police:
Current:
Personal services 4,717,606 4,717,606 4,413,403 304,203
Supplies 82,512 82,512 78,879 3,633
Other services and charges 192,878 192,878 221,514 (28,636)
Contractual services 69,626 69,626 75,256 (5,630)
Total police 5,062,622 5,062,622 4,789,052 273,570
Fire:
Current:
Personal services 905,401 905,401 1,008,160 (102,759)
Supplies 32,025 32,025 15,137 16,888
Other services and charges 107,475 107,475 90,232 17,243
Contractual services 49,124 49,124 72,156 (23,032)
Total fire protection 1,094,025 1,094,025 1,185,685 (91,660)
Building inspection:
Current:
Personal services 484,948 484,948 380,813 104,135
Supplies 1,750 1,750 1,331 419
Other services and charges 12,640 12,640 4,705 7,935
Contractual services 37,740 37,740 73,531 (35,791)
Total building inspection 537,078 537,078 460,380 76,698
Total public safety 6,693,725 6,693,725 6,435,117 258,608
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
90
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 4 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Expenditures: (continued)
Public works:
Streets:
Current:
Personal services 735,463 735,463 624,145 111,318
Supplies 223,000 223,000 190,660 32,340
Other services and charges 116,050 116,050 120,126 (4,076)
Contractual services 71,500 71,500 82,267 (10,767)
Total streets 1,146,013 1,146,013 1,017,198 128,815
Fleet:
Current:
Personal services 284,941 284,941 283,656 1,285
Supplies 246,300 246,300 217,919 28,381
Other services and charges 105,320 105,320 103,658 1,662
Contractual services 67,500 67,500 165,310 (97,810)
Total fleet 704,061 704,061 770,543 (66,482)
Total public works 1,850,074 1,850,074 1,787,741 62,333
Culture and recreation:
Parks:
Current:
Personal services 709,979 709,979 656,950 53,029
Supplies 50,000 50,000 63,392 (13,392)
Other services and charges 67,600 67,600 63,510 4,090
Contractual services 254,200 254,200 213,468 40,732
Total parks 1,081,779 1,081,779 997,320 84,459
Total culture and recreation 1,081,779 1,081,779 997,320 84,459
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
91
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 5 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Expenditures: (continued)
Conservation of natural resources:
Environmental:
Current:
Personal services 53,614 53,614 44,386 9,228
Supplies 1,000 1,000 11 989
Other services and charges 9,500 9,500 5,725 3,775
Contractual services 1,409 1,409 1,337 72
Total environmental 65,523 65,523 51,459 14,064
Solid waste abatement:
Current:
Personal services 54,617 54,617 40,069 14,548
Supplies 1,100 1,100 2,251 (1,151)
Other services and charges 9,000 9,000 2,649 6,351
Contractual services 22,700 22,700 22,089 611
Total solid waste abatement 87,417 87,417 67,058 20,359
Forestry:
Current:
Personal services 30,885 30,885 30,342 543
Supplies 3,250 3,250 1,248 2,002
Other services and charges 380 380 162 218
Contractual services 50,000 50,000 97,642 (47,642)
Total forestry 84,515 84,515 129,394 (44,879)
Total conservation of natural resources 237,455 237,455 247,911 (10,456)
Community development:
Economic development:
Current:
Personal services 430 430 160 270
Other services and charges 16,230 16,230 10,277 5,953
Contractual services 81,475 81,475 73,766 7,709
Total economic development 98,135 98,135 84,203 13,932
Community development:
Current:
Personal services 297,205 297,205 211,015 86,190
Supplies 100 100 50 50
Other services and charges 8,600 8,600 6,432 2,168
Contractual services 2,777 2,777 843 1,934
Total community development 308,682 308,682 218,340 90,342
Total community development 406,817 406,817 302,543 104,274
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
92
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 6 of 6
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Expenditures: (continued)
Other:
Contingency 79,247 79,247 - 79,247
Total expenditures 13,018,968 13,018,968 12,489,094 529,874
Revenues over (under) expenditures (20,000) (20,000) 1,237,087 1,257,087
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 20,000 20,000 20,000 -
Transfers out (150,000) (150,000) (286,590) (136,590)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets - - 2,040 2,040
Total other financing sources (uses)(130,000) (130,000) (264,550) (134,550)
Net change in fund balance ($150,000) ($150,000) 972,537 $1,122,537
Fund balance - January 1 8,583,880
Fund balance - December 31 $9,556,417
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
93
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 11
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - THE ROOKERY ACTIVITY CENTER
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Budgeted Amounts
2024 Actual
Amounts
Variance with
Final Budget -
Positive
(Negative)
Original Final
Revenues:
General property taxes $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $ -
Intergovernmental - - 8,825 8,825
Charges for services 1,366,820 1,366,820 1,277,687 (89,133)
Investment earnings - - 4,581 4,581
Miscellaneous 95,100 95,100 77,939 (17,161)
Total revenues 1,961,920 1,961,920 1,869,032 (92,888)
Expenditures:
Culture and recreation
Current:
Personal services 1,291,354 1,291,354 1,133,649 157,705
Supplies 98,862 98,862 78,630 20,232
Other services and charges 307,108 307,108 367,672 (60,564)
Contractual services 253,330 253,330 206,658 46,672
Total expenditures 1,950,654 1,950,654 1,786,609 164,045
Net change in fund balance $11,266 $11,266 82,423 $71,157
Fund balance - January 1 (5,067)
Fund balance - December 31 $77,356
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
94
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 12
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS
For The Last Ten Years
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total OPEB liability:
Service cost $63,419 $42,687 $59,608 $65,484 $63,577 $53,789 $16,547 $16,990
Interest 33,911 21,236 12,384 13,256 12,256 10,893 21,355 22,542
Changes of benefit terms - - - - - - - -
Differences between expected and actual experience -263,454 -(250,908)-(245,168)-(51,083)
Changes in assumptions (22,573) 38,665 (87,527) 93,391 - - - -
Benefit payments (35,789) (27,716) (22,971) (32,454) (22,990) (15,527) (27,798) (31,536)
38,968 338,326 (38,506) (111,231) 52,843 (196,013) 10,104 (43,087)
802,063 463,737 502,243 613,474 560,631 756,644 746,540 789,627
Net change in total OPEB liability
Total OPEB liability - beginning
Total OPEB liability - ending $841,031 $802,063 $463,737 $502,243 $613,474 $560,631 $756,644 $746,540
Covered-employee payroll $6,536,338 $6,392,776 $6,164,425 $5,109,645 $5,072,488 $5,072,488 $4,937,332 $4,937,332
Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered-employee payroll 12.9%12.5%7.5%9.8%12.1%11.1%15.3%15.1%
The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be added
as they become available.
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.95
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 13
SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY -
GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
For The Last Ten Years
City's City's
Proportionate Proportionate Plan
State's Share of the Share of the Fiduciary
Proportionate Net Pension Net Net
Share Liability Pension Position
City's City's (Amount) and the State's Liability as a
Proportionate Proportionate of the Net Proportionate as a Percentage
Share Share (Amount) Pension Share of the Net Percentage of the
Measurement Fiscal Year (Percentage) of of the Net Liability Pension Liability of its Total
Date Ending the Net Pension Pension Associated Associated with Covered Covered Pension
June 30, December 31, Liability Liability (a) with City (b) City (a+b) Payroll (c) Payroll ((a+b)/c) Liability
2015 2015 0.0410% $2,124,883 $ - $2,124,883 $2,407,426 88.3% 78.2%
2016 2016 0.0387% 3,142,248 41,033 3,183,281 2,401,546 132.6% 68.9%
2017 2017 0.0414% 2,642,949 33,230 2,676,179 2,666,880 100.3% 75.9%
2018 2018 0.0381% 2,113,632 69,419 2,183,051 2,563,053 85.2% 79.5%
2019 2019 0.0398% 2,200,453 68,330 2,268,783 2,814,860 80.6% 80.2%
2020 2020 0.0392% 2,350,219 72,457 2,422,676 2,797,444 86.6% 79.1%
2021 2021 0.0391% 1,669,745 50,998 1,720,743 2,812,588 61.2% 87.0%
2022 2022 0.0428% 3,389,774 99,480 3,489,254 3,208,575 108.7% 76.7%
2023 2023 0.0505% 2,823,903 77,857 2,901,760 4,018,380 72.2% 83.1%
2024 2024 0.0488% 1,802,947 46,621 1,849,568 4,127,560 44.8% 89.1%
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
96
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 14
SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS - GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
For The Last Ten Years
Statutorily Contributions in Contribution Contributions as a
Fiscal Year Required Relation to the Deficiency Covered Percentage of
Ending Contribution Statutorily Required (Excess) Payroll Covered
December 31, (a) Contribution (b) (a-b) (c) Payroll (b/c)
2015 $182,102 $182,102 $ - $2,428,027 7.5%
2016 193,684 193,684 - 2,582,452 7.5%
2017 192,510 192,510 - 2,566,800 7.5%
2018 202,526 202,526 - 2,700,347 7.5%
2019 208,807 208,807 - 2,784,089 7.5%
2020 206,802 206,802 - 2,757,351 7.5%
2021 223,767 223,767 - 2,983,557 7.5%
2022 272,865 272,865 - 3,638,203 7.5%
2023 305,242 305,242 - 4,071,180 7.5%
2024 321,519 321,519 - 4,286,920 7.5%
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
97
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 15
SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY -
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND
For The Last Ten Years
City's
Proportionate
State's Share of the
Proportionate Net Pension
Share Liability
(Amount) and the State's Proportionate Share
Proportionate of the Net Proportionate of the Net Pension Plan Fiduciary
Proportion Share (Amount) Pension Share of the Net Liability as a Net Position as
Measurement Fiscal Year (Percentage) of of the Net Liability Pension Liability Percentage of its a Percentage
Date Ending the Net Pension Pension Associated Associated with Covered Covered of the Total
June 30, December 31, Liability Liability (a) with City (b) City (a+b) Payroll (c) Payroll ((a+b)/c) Pension Liability
2015 2015 0.2490%$2,829,223 $ - $2,829,223 $2,284,973 123.8%86.6%
2016 2016 0.2590%10,394,121 - 10,394,121 2,495,778 416.5%63.9%
2017 2017 0.2570%3,469,806 - 3,469,806 2,643,314 131.3%85.4%
2018 2018 0.2426%2,585,866 - 2,585,866 2,556,951 101.1%88.8%
2019 2019 0.2547%2,711,539 - 2,711,539 2,689,536 100.8%89.3%
2020 2020 0.2336%3,079,098 72,537 3,151,635 2,638,619 119.4%87.2%
2021 2021 0.2234%1,724,411 77,543 1,801,954 2,602,793 69.2%93.7%
2022 2022 0.2367%10,300,249 450,081 10,750,330 2,875,683 373.8%70.5%
2023 2023 0.2303%3,976,982 160,211 4,137,193 3,024,258 136.8%86.5%
2024 2024 0.2256%2,968,216 113,147 3,081,363 3,124,186 98.6%90.2%
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
98
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 16
SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND
For The Last Ten Years
Statutorily Contributions in Contribution Contributions as a
Fiscal Year Required Relation to the Deficiency Covered Percentage of
Ending Contribution Statutorily Required (Excess)Payroll Covered
December 31,(a)Contribution (b) (a-b)(c)Payroll (b/c)
2015 $393,551 $393,551 $ - $2,429,327 16.20%
2016 424,970 424,970 - 2,623,271 16.20%
2017 416,665 416,665 - 2,572,006 16.20%
2018 420,821 420,821 - 2,597,660 16.20%
2019 452,731 452,731 - 2,670,979 16.95%
2020 444,711 444,711 - 2,512,491 17.70%
2021 479,593 479,593 - 2,709,565 17.70%
2022 524,594 524,594 - 2,963,805 17.70%
2023 541,104 541,104 - 3,057,084 17.70%
2024 555,870 555,870 - 3,140,508 17.70%
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
99
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS -
LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT - FIRE DIVISION
For The Last Ten Years
Fiscal year ending - December 31: 2024 2023 & 2022 * 2021
Measurement date - December 31:2023 2022 2021
Total pension liability:
Service cost $62,261 $62,261 $67,890
Interest on pension liability 35,283 32,439 19,363
Changes of benefit terms - - -
Differences between expected and actual experience (17,070)(11,917)59,354
Changes of assumptions - - -
Changes in benefit level - - 100,057
Benefit payments (24,520)(46,223) -
Net change in total pension liability 55,954 36,560 246,664
Total pension liability - beginning 538,056 501,496 254,832
Total pension liability - ending (a)$594,010 $538,056 $501,496
Plan fiduciary net position:
Contributions - employer $ - $ - $ -
Contributions - State of Minnesota 170,000 147,799 137,872
Contributions - other - - -
Net investment income 159,422 (150,995)83,292
Benefit payments (24,520)(46,223) -
Administrative expense - (724)(707)
Net change in plan fiduciary net position 304,902 (50,143)220,457
Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 984,693 1,034,836 814,379
Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b)$1,289,595 $984,693 $1,034,836
Net pension asset - ending (b) - (a)$695,585 $446,637 $533,340
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of
the total pension liability 217%183%206%
Covered payroll N/A N/A N/A
Net pension liability as a percentage of
covered employee payroll N/A N/A N/A
N/A - the Lino Lakes Fire Department is comprised of paid on-call firefighters whose pay does not meet the definition
of covered payroll.
The City created its own fire department in 2016. Therefore, information prior to 2016 is not available. Additional years will
be reported as they become available.
* Prior to 2023, the fiscal year end and measurement date were the same. However, 2023 plan information from
PERA was not available and therefore, 2022 amounts were re-reported in the City's 2023 ACFR.
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
100
Statement 17
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
$46,865 $52,320 $48,182 $47,952 $38,419
19,051 16,603 8,754 6,191 3,568
- - - - -
(81,734)(22,680)69,760 (11,672)(7,804)
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
(15,818)46,243 126,696 42,471 34,183
270,650 224,407 97,711 55,240 21,057
$254,832 $270,650 $224,407 $97,711 $55,240
$ - $ - $ - $ - $44,394
130,846 121,630 118,144 113,797 -
- - 64,869 58,800 -
95,960 78,063 (18,696)9,153 133
- - - - -
(746)(694)(702)(572) -
226,060 198,999 163,615 181,178 44,527
588,319 389,320 225,705 44,527 -
$814,379 $588,319 $389,320 $225,705 $44,527
$559,547 $317,669 $164,913 $127,994 ($10,713)
320%217%173%231%81%
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
101
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 18
SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS - LINO LAKES PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT - FIRE DIVISION
For The Last Ten Years
Statutorily Contributions in Contribution Contributions as a
Fiscal Year Required Relation to the Deficiency Covered Percentage of
Ending Contribution Statutorily Required (Excess) Payroll Covered-Employee
December 31, (a) Contribution (b) (a-b) (c) Payroll (b/c)
2016 $ - $44,394 ($44,394) N/A N/A
2017 - - - N/A N/A
2018 - - - N/A N/A
2019 - - - N/A N/A
2020 - - - N/A N/A
2021 - - - N/A N/A
2022 - - - N/A N/A
2023 - - - N/A N/A
2024 - - - N/A N/A
N/A - the Lino Lakes Fire Department is comprised of paid on-call firefighters, whose pay does not meet the defintion of
covered payroll.
The City created its own fire department in 2016. Therefore, information prior to 2016 is not available. Additional years
will be reported as they become available.
See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information.
102
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
NOTES TO RSI
December 31, 2024
Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS
The General Fund and the Rookery Activity Center special revenue fund budgets are legally adopted on a basis
consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of
budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund and the fund level for the Rookery Activity Center
fund.
Note B OPEB INFORMATION
No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75 to pay related
benefits.
Note C PENSION INFORMATION
PERA – General Employees Retirement Fund
2024 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The following changes in assumptions are effective with the July 1, 2024 valuation, as recommended in the
most recent experience study (dated June 29, 2023):
Rates of merit and seniority were adjusted, resulting in slightly higher rates.
Assumed rates of retirement were adjusted as follows: increase the rate of assumed unreduced
retirements, slight adjustments to Rule of 90 retirement rates, and slight adjustments to early retirement
rates for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members.
Minor increase in assumed withdrawals for males and females.
Lower rates of disability.
Continued use of Pub-2010 general mortality table with slight rate adjustments as recommended in the
most recent experience study.
Minor changes to form of payment assumptions for male and female retirees.
Minor changes to assumptions made with respect to missing participant data.
2024 Changes in Plan Provisions:
The workers’ compensation offset for disability benefits was eliminated. The actuarial equivalent
factors updated to reflect the changes in assumptions.
2023 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The investment return assumption and single discount rate were changed from 6.50% to 7.00%.
2023 Changes in Plan Provisions:
An additional one-time direct state aid contribution of $170.1 million was contributed to the Plan on
October 1, 2023.
The vesting period of those hired after June 30, 2010, was changed from five years of allowable
service to three years of allowable service.
The benefit increase delay for early retirements on or after January 1, 2024, was eliminated.
A one-time, non-compounding benefit increase of 2.50% minus the actual 2024 adjustment will be
payable in a lump sum for calendar year 2024 by March 31, 2024.
2022 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2020 to Scale MP-2021.
103
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
NOTES TO RSI
December 31, 2024
2021 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The investment return and single discount rates were changed from 7.50% to 6.50% for financial
reporting purposes.
The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2019 to Scale MP-2020.
2020 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The price inflation assumption was decreased from 2.50% to 2.25%.
The payroll growth assumption was decreased from 3.25% to 3.00%.
Assumed salary increase rates were decreased 0.25% and assumed rates of retirement were changed
resulting in more unreduced (normal) retirements and slightly fewer Rule of 90 and early retirements.
Assumed rates of termination and disability were also changed.
Base mortality tables were changed from RP-2014 tables to Pub-2010 tables, with adjustments.
The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2018 to Scale MP-2019.
The spouse age difference was changed from two years older for females to one year older.
The assumed number of married male new retirees electing the 100% Joint & Survivor option changed
from 35% to 45%. The assumed number of married female new retirees electing the 100% Joint &
Survivor option changed from 15% to 30%. The corresponding number of married new retirees
electing the Life annuity option was adjusted accordingly.
2020 Changes in Plan Provisions:
Augmentation for current privatized members was reduced to 2.0% for the period July 1, 2020 through
December 31, 2023 and 0.0% after. Augmentation was eliminated for privatizations occurring after
June 30, 2020.
2019 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018.
2019 Changes in the Plan Provisions:
The employer supplemental contribution was changed prospectively, decreasing from $31.0 million to
$21.0 million per year. The State’s special funding contribution was changed prospectively, requiring
$16.0 million due per year through 2031.
2018 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2015 to MP-2017.
The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.00% per year through 2044 and 2.50% per year
thereafter to 1.25% per year.
2017 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8% for active members and 60%
for vested and non-vested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.0% for active
member liability, 15.0% for vested deferred member liability and 3.0% for non-vested deferred
member liability.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year for all years to
1.0% per year through 2044 and 2.5% per year thereafter.
2016 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035 and
2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was changed
from 7.9% to 7.5%.
Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed
future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll
growth and 2.50% for inflation.
104
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
NOTES TO RSI
December 31, 2024
PERA – Public Employees Police and Fire Fund
2024 Changes in Plan Provisions:
The State contribution of $9.0 million per year will continue until the earlier of 1) both the Police &
Fire Plan and the State Patrol Retirement Fund attain 90 percent funded status for three consecutive
years (on an actuarial value of assets basis) or 2) July 1, 2048. The contribution was previously due to
expire after attaining a 90 percent funded status for one year.
The additional $9.0 million contribution will continue until the Police & Fire Plan is fully funded for a
minimum of three consecutive years on an actuarial value of assets basis, or July 1, 2048, whichever is
earlier. This contribution was previously due to expire upon attainment of fully funded status on an
actuarial value of assets basis for one year (or July 1, 2048 if earlier).
2023 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The investment return assumption was changed from 6.50% to 7.00%.
The single discount rate changed from 5.40% to 7.00%
2023 Changes in Plan Provisions:
An additional one-time direct state aid contribution of $19.4 million was contributed to the Plan on
October 1, 2023.
Vesting requirement for new hires after June 30, 2014, was changed from a graded 20-year vesting
schedule to a graded 10-year vesting schedule, with 50% vesting after five years, increasing
incrementally to 100% after 10 years.
A one-time, non-compounding benefit increase of 3.00% will be payable in a lump sum for calendar
year 2024 by March 31, 2024.
Psychological treatment is required effective July 1, 2023, prior to approval for a duty disability
benefit for a psychological condition relating to the member’s occupation.
The total and permanent duty disability benefit was increased, effective July 1, 2023.
2022 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The single discount rate changed from 6.50% to 5.4%.
The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2020 to Scale MP-2021.
2021 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The investment return and single discount rates were changed from 7.50% to 6.50% for financial
reporting purposes.
The inflation assumption was changed from 2.50% to 2.25%.
The payroll growth assumption was changed from 3.25% to 3.00%.
The base mortality tables for healthy annuitants, disabled annuitants and employees were changed
from RP-2014 tables to Pub-2010 Public Safety Mortality tables. The mortality improvement scale
was changed from MP-2019 to MN-2020.
Assumed salary increase and retirement rates were modified as recommended in the July 14, 2020
experience study. The changes result in a decrease in gross salary increase rates, slightly more
unreduced retirements and fewer assumed early retirements.
Assumed rates of withdrawal were changed from select and ultimate rates to service-based rates. The
changes result in more assumed terminations.
Assumed rates of disability were increased for ages 25-44 and decreased for ages over 49. Overall,
proposed rates result in more projected disabilities.
Assumed percent married for active female members was changed from 60% to 70%.
2020 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2018 to MP-2019.
105
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
NOTES TO RSI
December 31, 2024
2019 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018.
2018 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2016 to MP-2017.
2017 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The single discount rate was changed from 5.6% to 7.5%.
Assumed salary increases were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2016 experience study. The
net effect is proposed rates that average 0.34% lower than the previous rates.
Assumed rates of retirement were changed, resulting in fewer retirements.
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) load was 30% for vested and non-vested deferred members.
The CSA has been changed to 33% for vested members and 2 percent for non-vested members.
The base mortality table for healthy annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 fully generational table
to the RP-2014 fully generational table (with a base year of 2006), with male rates adjusted by a factor
of 0.96. The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale AA to Scale MP-2016. The base
mortality table for disabled annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 disabled mortality table to the
mortality tables assumed for healthy retirees.
Assumed termination rates were decreased to 3% for the first three years of service. Rates beyond the
select period of three years were adjusted, resulting in more expected terminations overall.
Assumed percentage of married female members was decreased from 65% to 60%.
Assumed age difference was changed from separate assumptions for male members (wives assumed to
be three years younger) and female members (husbands assumed to be four years older) to the
assumption that males are two years older than females.
The assumed percentage of female members electing Joint and Survivor annuities was increased.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00% for all years to 1.00% per
year through 2064 and 2.50% thereafter.
2016 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2037 and
2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate changed
from 7.9% to 5.6%.
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25%
for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation.
Single Employer – Fire Division
During 2021, the benefit level per year of service increased from $5,000 to $7,000. There have been no other
factors, such as changes to assumptions, that affect trends in the amounts reported since the Fire Division was
created.
106
COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL NONMAJOR
FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
107
- This page intentionally left blank -
108
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that
are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Debt Service Funds account for the accumulation of resources for, and payment of, interest,
principal and related costs on general long-term debt.
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
Capital Project Funds account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or
construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds).
PERMANENT FUNDS
Permanent Funds account for financial resources that are legally restricted to the extent that only
earnings, and not the principal, may be used for purposes that support the City’s programs.
The City maintains one permanent fund – the Environment and Stewardship Fund. This fund
accounts for the use of funds received for environmental maintenance and improvements in the
Foxborough area, as well as funds received for the Preserve area.
109
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET Statement 19
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2024
Permanent
Fund Total
Environment & Nonmajor
Special Debt Capital Stewardship Governmental
Revenue Service Project Fund Funds
Assets
Cash and investments $1,243,303 $3,778,075 $8,491,971 $144,924 $13,658,273
Advances to other funds - - 202,000 - 202,000
Taxes receivable:
Due from county - - 167,953 - 167,953
Special assessments receivable:
Due from county - 1,460 601 - 2,061
Delinquent - 688 306 - 994
Deferred - 318,991 158,333 - 477,324
Leases receivable - - 1,165,913 - 1,165,913
Interfund loan receivable - - 738,060 - 738,060
Total assets $1,243,303 $4,099,214 $10,925,137 $144,924 $16,412,578
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $12,445 $ - $439,782 $2,000 $454,227
Advances from other funds - - 202,000 - 202,000
Retainage payable - - 17,389 - 17,389
Unearned revenue - - 2,500 - 2,500
Interfund loan payable - - 1,297,170 - 1,297,170
Total liabilities 12,445 - 1,958,841 2,000 1,973,286
Deferred inflows of resources:
Unavailable revenue - 319,679 158,639 - 478,318
Lease related - - 1,165,913 - 1,165,913
Total deferred inflows of resources - 319,679 1,324,552 - 1,644,231
Fund balance:
Nonspendable - - - 100,000 100,000
Restricted 930,435 3,779,535 1,688,464 42,924 6,441,358
Committed 300,423 - - - 300,423
Assigned - - 7,567,121 - 7,567,121
Unassigned - - (1,613,841) - (1,613,841)
Total fund balance 1,230,858 3,779,535 7,641,744 142,924 12,795,061
Total liabilities, deferred inflows
of resources, and fund balance $1,243,303 $4,099,214 $10,925,137 $144,924 $16,412,578
110
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 20
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Permanent
Fund Total
Environment & Nonmajor
Special Debt Capital Stewardship Governmental
Revenue Service Project Fund Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes $10,000 $1,287,724 $1,105,000 $ - $2,402,724
Other taxes 24,948 37,994 - - 62,942
Tax increment - - 1,002,712 - 1,002,712
Special assessments - 52,755 577,019 - 629,774
Intergovernmental 92,284 - - 92,284
Charges for services 1,916 - 692,164 - 694,080
Fines and forfeits 5,375 - - - 5,375
Investment earnings 56,218 140,555 320,512 6,470 523,755
Miscellaneous 2,500 - - 5,700 8,200
Total revenues 193,241 1,519,028 3,697,407 12,170 5,421,846
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 3,952 - 386,508 - 390,460
Public safety 114,027 - 2,887 - 116,914
Public works - - 246,316 - 246,316
Culture and recreation 13,823 - 41,536 - 55,359
Conservation of natural resources - - - 7,850 7,850
Community development - - 437,159 - 437,159
Capital outlay:
Public safety 92,532 - - - 92,532
Public works - - 2,063,491 - 2,063,491
Culture and recreation - - 739,636 - 739,636
Debt service:
Principal - 2,115,475 - - 2,115,475
Interest and fiscal charges - 508,966 - - 508,966
Total expenditures 224,334 2,624,441 3,917,533 7,850 6,774,158
Revenues over (under) expenditures (31,093) (1,105,413) (220,126)4,320 (1,352,312)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in - 764,486 1,707,113 - 2,471,599
Transfers out (20,000) (306,406) (1,753,219) - (2,079,625)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets - - 1,125 - 1,125
Total other financing sources (uses) (20,000) 458,080 (44,981) - 393,099
Net change in fund balance (51,093) (647,333) (265,107)4,320 (959,213)
Fund balance - January 1 1,281,951 4,426,868 7,906,851 138,604 13,754,274
Fund balance - December 31 $1,230,858 $3,779,535 $7,641,744 $142,924 $12,795,061
111
- This page intentionally left blank -
112
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are
legally restricted to expenditures for particular purposes. The City maintained the following
nonmajor Special Revenue Funds during the year.
Economic Development Authority – established to account for the receipt and uses of
funds for economic development purposes.
Cable TV and Communications – established to account for activities relating to Cable
TV and Communications.
Blue Heron Days – established to account for the activities associated with the Blue
Heron Days festival.
State Narcotics Forfeitures – established to account for activities associated with the
receipt and use of state narcotics forfeitures.
DUI Forfeitures – established to account for activities associated with the receipt and use
of DUI forfeitures.
Other Forfeitures – established to account for activities associated with the receipt and
use of other forfeitures.
Federal Forfeitures - Treasury – established to account for activities associated with the
receipt and use of equitable sharing paid from the U.S. Department of Treasury Forfeiture
Fund.
K-9 Unit – established to account for donations received by the City which are restricted
for K-9 Unit purposes.
Public Safety Aid – established to account for aid received from the State of Minnesota
for public safety purposes.
Local Affordable Housing Aid – established to account for aid received from the State of
Minnesota for local affordable housing.
113
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
December 31, 2024
203
Economic 204 Cable 207 State
Development TV and 205 Blue Narcotics
Authority Communications Heron Days Forfeitures
Assets
Cash and investments $258,762 $266,690 $14,657 $26,608
Total assets $258,762 $266,690 $14,657 $26,608
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ - $29 $ - $ -
Fund balance:
Restricted 225,000 - 14,657 26,608
Committed 33,762 266,661 - -
Total fund balance 258,762 266,661 14,657 26,608
Total liabilities and fund balance $258,762 $266,690 $14,657 $26,608
114
Statement 21
Total
210 214 215 Nonmajor
Federal Public Local Special
208 DUI 209 Other Forfeitures - 211 K-9 Safety Affordable Revenue
Forfeitures Forfeitures Treasury Unit Aid Housing Aid Funds
$58,042 $1,652 $5,312 $5,290 $516,646 $89,644 $1,243,303
$58,042 $1,652 $5,312 $5,290 $516,646 $89,644 $1,243,303
$ - $ - $3,739 $249 $8,428 $ - $12,445
58,042 1,652 1,573 5,041 508,218 89,644 930,435
- - - - - - 300,423
58,042 1,652 1,573 5,041 508,218 89,644 1,230,858
$58,042 $1,652 $5,312 $5,290 $516,646 $89,644 $1,243,303
115
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
203
Economic 204 Cable 207 State
Development TV and 205 Blue Narcotics
Authority Communications Heron Days Forfeitures
Revenues:
General property taxes $ - $ - $10,000 $ -
Other taxes - 24,948 - -
Intergovernmental - - 4,000 -
Charges for services - - 1,916 -
Fines and forfeits - - - 865
Investment earnings 11,525 11,912 642 1,454
Miscellaneous - - 2,500 -
Total revenues 11,525 36,860 19,058 2,319
Expenditures:
Current:
General government - 3,952 - -
Public safety - - - 7,400
Culture and recreation - 3,978 9,845 -
Capital outlay:
Public safety - - - -
Total expenditures - 7,930 9,845 7,400
Revenues over (under) expenditures 11,525 28,930 9,213 (5,081)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - (20,000) - -
Net change in fund balance 11,525 8,930 9,213 (5,081)
Fund balance - January 1 247,237 257,731 5,444 31,689
Fund balance - December 31 $258,762 $266,661 $14,657 $26,608
116
Statement 22
Total
210 214 215 Nonmajor
Federal Public Local Special
208 DUI 209 Other Forfeitures - 211 K-9 Safety Affordable Revenue
Forfeitures Forfeitures Treasury Unit Aid Housing Aid Funds
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $10,000
- - - - - - 24,948
- - - - - 88,284 92,284
- - - - - - 1,916
4,325 185 - - - - 5,375
2,480 69 275 515 25,986 1,360 56,218
- - - - - - 2,500
6,805 254 275 515 25,986 89,644 193,241
- - - - - - 3,952
2,131 100 21,231 8,246 74,919 - 114,027
- - - - - - 13,823
- - - - 92,532 - 92,532
2,131 100 21,231 8,246 167,451 - 224,334
4,674 154 (20,956) (7,731) (141,465) 89,644 (31,093)
- - - - - - (20,000)
4,674 154 (20,956) (7,731) (141,465) 89,644 (51,093)
53,368 1,498 22,529 12,772 649,683 - 1,281,951
$58,042 $1,652 $1,573 $5,041 $508,218 $89,644 $1,230,858
117
- This page intentionally left blank -
118
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment
of, interest, principal and related costs on general long-term debt. The City’s Debt Service Funds
account for four types of bonded indebtedness:
General Debt Bonds – are repaid primarily from property taxes.
Improvement Bonds and Notes – are repaid primarily from special assessments.
Public Facility Lease Revenue Bonds – are repaid primarily from lease revenues received
from the EDA leasing the buildings to the City of Lino Lakes and other tenants.
Revenue Bonds – these bonds were issued to finance various improvements and will be
repaid primarily from pledged revenues derived from the constructed assets.
Capital Note – this note was issued to finance cable communications equipment and will
be repaid from revenues derived from franchise fees.
119
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
December 31, 2024
337 G.O.
Improvement 338 G.O.
Bonds Bonds
of 2014A of 2015A
Assets
Cash and investments $287,191 $735,568
Special assessments receivable:
Due from county - -
Delinquent - -
Deferred - -
Total assets $287,191 $735,568
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ - $ -
Deferred inflows of resources:
Unavailable revenue - -
Fund balance:
Restricted 287,191 735,568
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balance $287,191 $735,568
120
Statement 23
339 EDA 341 G.O. Total
Lease Utility 345 G.O.Nonmajor
Revenue Revenue 344 G.O. Utility Revenue 346 G.O.Debt
Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Service
of 2015B of 2016A of 2018A of 2020A of 2021A Funds
$408,503 $275,860 $1,612,464 $239,346 $219,143 $3,778,075
- - 1,460 - - 1,460
- - 688 - - 688
- - 318,991 - - 318,991
$408,503 $275,860 $1,933,603 $239,346 $219,143 $4,099,214
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- - 319,679 - - 319,679
408,503 275,860 1,613,924 239,346 219,143 3,779,535
$408,503 $275,860 $1,933,603 $239,346 $219,143 $4,099,214
121
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
3
332 G.O.336 G.O. 337 G.O.
TIF 335 G.O. Improvement Improvement 338 G.O.
Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds
of 2007A of 2012A of 2013A of 2014A of 2015A
Revenues:
General property taxes $ - $ - $ - $ - $274,589
Other taxes - - - - -
Special assessments - - - - -
Investment earnings - 399 1,284 12,838 25,622
Total revenues - 399 1,284 12,838 300,211
Expenditures:
Debt service:
Principal 280,000 165,000 65,000 155,000 220,000
Interest and fiscal charges 5,775 1,361 1,300 6,815 39,377
Total expenditures 285,775 166,361 66,300 161,815 259,377
Revenues over (under) expenditures (285,775) (165,962) (65,016) (148,977) 40,834
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 140,471 - - 124,165 -
Transfers out - (72,273) (232,529) - -
Total other financing sources (uses) 140,471 (72,273) (232,529) 124,165 -
Net change in fund balance (145,304) (238,235) (297,545) (24,812) 40,834
Fund balance - January 1 145,304 238,235 297,545 312,003 694,734
Fund balance - December 31 $ - $ - $ - $287,191 $735,568
122
Statement 24
339 EDA 341 G.O. Total
Lease 340 G.O. Utility 345 G.O. Nonmajor
Revenue Capital Revenue 344 G.O. Utility Revenue 346 G.O. Debt
Bonds Note Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Service
of 2015B of 2016A of 2016A of 2018A of 2020A of 2021A Funds
$319,765 $ - $ - $485,475 $ - $207,895 $1,287,724
- 37,994 - - - - 37,994
- - - 52,755 - - 52,755
12,804 467 12,370 58,966 11,445 4,360 140,555
332,569 38,461 12,370 597,196 11,445 212,255 1,519,028
200,000 35,475 145,000 435,000 245,000 170,000 2,115,475
103,202 2,519 11,014 207,078 100,165 30,360 508,966
303,202 37,994 156,014 642,078 345,165 200,360 2,624,441
29,367 467 (143,644) (44,882) (333,720) 11,895 (1,105,413)
- - 155,350 - 344,500 - 764,486
- (1,604) - - - - (306,406)
- (1,604) 155,350 - 344,500 - 458,080
29,367 (1,137) 11,706 (44,882) 10,780 11,895 (647,333)
379,136 1,137 264,154 1,658,806 228,566 207,248 4,426,868
$408,503 $ - $275,860 $1,613,924 $239,346 $219,143 $3,779,535
123
- This page intentionally left blank -
124
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
Capital Project Funds account for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other
than those financed by Proprietary Funds. The City maintained the following nonmajor Capital
Project Funds during the year:
Closed Bond – to account for excess funds from matured bond issues.
Building and Facilities – to account for the activities associated with the maintenance and
replacement of municipal buildings and facilities.
Office Equipment Replacement – to account for the receipt and use of funds for office
equipment purchases.
Dedicated Parks – to account for the receipts and use of monies collected from park
dedication fees.
Tax Increment Financing Funds – to account for development projects financed with tax
increments.
Pavement Management – to account for the financing of street maintenance projects.
Surface Water Management – to account for the financing of surface water infrastructure
and wetland bank activity.
Street Reconstruction – to account for the financing of future reconstruction of City
streets.
Park and Trail Improvements – to account for park and trail improvement activities.
Comp Plan Update – this fund accounts for the financing sources received and
expenditures incurred to update the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Pheasant Run Reconstruction – to account for the financing of the Pheasant Run street
reconstruction project.
2024 Street Reconstruction – to account for the financing of the 2024 Street
Reconstruction project.
125
- This page intentionally left blank -
126
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET Statement 25
NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Page 1 of 2
December 31, 2024
403 Office 405
301 Closed 401 Building Equipment Dedicated
Bond and Facilities Replacement Parks
Assets
Cash and investments $456,027 $2,475,199 $55,500 $1,374,743
Advances to other funds 50,299 - - -
Taxes receivable:
Due from county - - - -
Special assessments receivable:
Due from county - - - -
Delinquent - - - -
Deferred - - - -
Leases receivable - 1,165,913 - -
Interfund loan receivable - 738,060 - -
Total assets $506,326 $4,379,172 $55,500 $1,374,743
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ - $15,732 $210 $110,889
Advances from other funds - - - -
Retainage payable - - - -
Unearned revenue - 2,500 - -
Interfund loan payable - - - -
Total liabilities - 18,232 210 110,889
Deferred inflows of resources:
Unavailable revenue - - - -
Lease related - 1,165,913 - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - 1,165,913 - -
Fund balance:
Restricted - - - 1,263,854
Assigned 506,326 3,195,027 55,290 -
Unassigned - - - -
Total fund balance 506,326 3,195,027 55,290 1,263,854
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balance $506,326 $4,379,172 $55,500 $1,374,743
127
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
December 31, 2024
418 Tax 419 Tax 430 Tax 421
Increment Increment Increment Pavement
Financing 1-11 Financing 1-12 Financing 1-13 Management
Assets
Cash and investments $928 $411,910 $4,414 $461,730
Advances to other funds - - - 151,701
Taxes receivable:
Due from county 48 - 167,905 -
Special assessments receivable:
Due from county - - - -
Delinquent - - - -
Deferred - - - -
Leases receivable - - - -
Interfund loan receivable - - - -
Total assets $976 $411,910 $172,319 $613,431
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $176 $ - $159,619 $34,380
Advances from other funds - - - -
Retainage payable - - - 17,389
Unearned revenue - - - -
Interfund loan payable 1,297,170 - - -
Total liabilities 1,297,346 - 159,619 51,769
Deferred inflows of resources:
Unavailable revenue - - - -
Lease related - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - -
Fund balance:
Restricted - 411,910 12,700 -
Assigned - - - 561,662
Unassigned (1,296,370) - - -
Total fund balance (1,296,370) 411,910 12,700 561,662
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balance $976 $411,910 $172,319 $613,431
128
Statement 25
Page 2 of 2
Total
422 Surface 425 487 488 Nonmajor
Water 423 Street Park and Trail 484 Comp Pheasant Run 2024 Street Capital
Management Reconstruction Improvements Plan Update Reconstruction Reconstruction Project Funds
$2,616,260 $473,867 $161,393 $ - $ - $ - $8,491,971
- - - - - - 202,000
- - - - - - 167,953
140 461 - - - - 601
306 - - - - - 306
147,557 10,776 - - - - 158,333
- - - - - - 1,165,913
- - - - - - 738,060
$2,764,263 $485,104 $161,393 $ - $ - $ - $10,925,137
$3,305 $ - $ - $48,225 $ - $67,246 $439,782
- - - 50,299 - 151,701 202,000
- - - - - - 17,389
- - - - - - 2,500
- - - - - - 1,297,170
3,305 - - 98,524 - 218,947 1,958,841
147,863 10,776 - - - - 158,639
- - - - - - 1,165,913
147,863 10,776 - - - - 1,324,552
- - - - - - 1,688,464
2,613,095 474,328 161,393 - - - 7,567,121
- - - (98,524) - (218,947) (1,613,841)
2,613,095 474,328 161,393 (98,524) - (218,947) 7,641,744
$2,764,263 $485,104 $161,393 $ - $ - $ - $10,925,137
129
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
403 Office 405 417 Tax
301 Closed 401 Building Equipment Dedicated Increment
Bond and Facilities Replacement Parks Financing 1-10
Revenues:
General property taxes $ - $ - $25,000 $ - $ -
Tax increment - - - - -
Special assessments - - - - -
Charges for services - 215,220 - 476,944 -
Investment earnings 23,321 87,857 2,105 53,613 16
Total revenues 23,321 303,077 27,105 530,557 16
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 38,966 55,812 137,791 - -
Public safety - - 2,887 - -
Public works - - 2,252 - -
Culture and recreation - - 1,443 6,021 -
Community development - - 1,701 - 1,536
Capital outlay:
Public works - - - - -
Culture and recreation - - - 599,636 -
Total expenditures 38,966 55,812 146,074 605,657 1,536
Revenues over (under) expenditures (15,645) 247,265 (118,969) (75,100)(1,520)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 73,877 - 114,945 - -
Transfers out (14,945) - - - -
Proceeds from sale of capital assets - - 1,125 - -
Total other financing sources (uses)58,932 - 116,070 - -
Net change in fund balance 43,287 247,265 (2,899) (75,100)(1,520)
Fund balance - January 1 463,039 2,947,762 58,189 1,338,954 1,520
Fund balance - December 31 $506,326 $3,195,027 $55,290 $1,263,854 $0
130
Statement 26
Page 1 of 2
418 Tax 419 Tax 430 Tax 421 422 Surface
Increment Increment Increment Pavement Water 423 Street
Financing 1-11 Financing 1-12 Financing 1-13 Management Management Reconstruction
$ - $ - $ - $990,000 $ - $ -
438,215 228,686 335,811 - - -
- - - - 565,461 11,558
- - - - - -
3,415 8,899 80 2,108 105,267 21,289
441,630 237,585 335,891 992,108 670,728 32,847
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - 221,250 22,814 -
- - - - - -
10,928 97,633 325,361 - - -
- - - 1,851,717 - -
- - - - - -
10,928 97,633 325,361 2,072,967 22,814 -
430,702 139,952 10,530 (1,080,859) 647,914 32,847
- - - 1,471,631 - -
(1,728,204) - - - - (10,070)
- - - - - -
(1,728,204) - - 1,471,631 - (10,070)
(1,297,502) 139,952 10,530 390,772 647,914 22,777
1,132 271,958 2,170 170,890 1,965,181 451,551
($1,296,370) $411,910 $12,700 $561,662 $2,613,095 $474,328
131
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES,Statement 26
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Page 2 of 2
NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Total
425 487 488 Nonmajor
Park and Trail 484 Comp Pheasant Run 2024 Street Capital
Improvements Plan Update Reconstruction Reconstruction Project Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes $90,000 $ - $ - $ - $1,105,000
Tax increment - - - - 1,002,712
Special assessments - - - - 577,019
Charges for services - - - - 692,164
Investment earnings 9,552 815 2,175 - 320,512
Total revenues 99,552 815 2,175 - 3,697,407
Expenditures:
Current:
General government - 153,939 - - 386,508
Public safety - - - - 2,887
Public works - - - - 246,316
Culture and recreation 34,072 - - - 41,536
Community development - - - - 437,159
Capital outlay:
Public works - - 36,494 175,280 2,063,491
Culture and recreation 140,000 - - - 739,636
Total expenditures 174,072 153,939 36,494 175,280 3,917,533
Revenues over (under) expenditures (74,520) (153,124) (34,319) (175,280) (220,126)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in - 36,590 10,070 - 1,707,113
Transfers out - - - - (1,753,219)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets - - - - 1,125
Total other financing sources (uses) - 36,590 10,070 - (44,981)
Net change in fund balance (74,520) (116,534) (24,249) (175,280) (265,107)
Fund balance - January 1 235,913 18,010 24,249 (43,667) 7,906,851
Fund balance - December 31 $161,393 ($98,524) $0 ($218,947) $7,641,744
132
STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
133
- This page intentionally left blank -
134
This part of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report presents detailed
information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures
and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health.
Table
Number
Financial Trends Tables 1-4
These tables contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial
performance and well-being have changed over time.
Revenue Capacity Tables 5-8
These tables contain information to help the reader assess the City's most significant local
revenue source, the property tax.
Debt Capacity Tables 9-12
These tables present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current
levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future.
Demographic and Economic Information Tables 13-14
These tables offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the
environment wihthin which the City's financial activities take place.
Operating Information Tables 15-17
These tables contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the
information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the
activities it performs.
STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Contents
135
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2015 2016 2017 2018
Governmental activities:
Net investment in capital assets $18,230,746 $18,597,344 $22,868,259 $24,640,555
Restricted 8,635,293 13,342,852 11,730,147 10,579,817
Unrestricted 13,888,120 10,187,254 12,017,212 16,577,520
Total governmental activities net position $40,754,159 $42,127,450 $46,615,618 $51,797,892
Business-type activities:
Net investment in capital assets $29,127,829 $31,860,610 $31,831,950 $32,709,079
Unrestricted 14,672,630 13,863,447 14,846,045 15,570,827
Total business-type activities net position $43,800,459 $45,724,057 $46,677,995 $48,279,906
Primary government:
Net investment in capital assets $47,358,575 $50,457,954 $54,700,209 $57,349,634
Restricted 8,635,293 13,342,852 11,730,147 10,579,817
Unrestricted 28,560,750 24,050,701 26,863,257 32,148,347
Total primary government net position $84,554,618 $87,851,507 $93,293,613 $100,077,798
GASB 75 was implemented in 2017. Net position was restated for 2016 to reflect the reporting of the OPEB liability
and OPEB related deferred inflows of resources. Net position for years prior to 2016 was not restated.
136
Table 1
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$28,433,053 $31,960,308 $38,987,698 $43,292,333 $48,061,305 $50,860,601
12,390,431 13,446,203 13,889,250 10,200,962 9,398,180 7,378,391
17,640,035 18,686,238 21,975,414 21,078,214 21,364,755 25,568,337
$58,463,519 $64,092,749 $74,852,362 $74,571,509 $78,824,240 $83,807,329
$36,390,820 $43,366,197 $43,566,016 $49,792,563 $50,119,172 $53,198,585
16,237,228 16,054,144 16,425,602 14,574,403 15,375,587 18,243,689
$52,628,048 $59,420,341 $59,991,618 $64,366,966 $65,494,759 $71,442,274
$64,823,873 $75,326,505 $82,553,714 $93,084,896 $98,180,477 $104,059,186
12,390,431 13,446,203 13,889,250 10,200,962 9,398,180 7,378,391
33,877,263 34,740,382 38,401,016 35,652,617 36,740,342 43,812,026
$111,091,567 $123,513,090 $134,843,980 $138,938,475 $144,318,999 $155,249,603
137
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2015 2016 2017 2018
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government $2,016,351 $2,456,864 $2,395,633 $2,345,386
Public safety 5,135,865 6,567,523 5,166,538 4,749,394
Public works 7,971,712 6,228,893 5,492,395 5,384,522
Culture and recreation - - - -
Conservation of natural resources 186,111 216,905 200,016 201,590
Community development 432,268 454,144 459,455 576,794
Interest and fees on long-term debt 632,876 831,529 518,897 414,607
Total governmental activities expenses 16,375,183 16,755,858 14,232,934 13,672,293
Business-type activities:
Water 1,394,897 1,367,693 1,245,249 1,332,755
Sewer 2,089,842 1,850,962 1,901,821 1,964,471
Storm water - - - -
Total business-type activities expenses 3,484,739 3,218,655 3,147,070 3,297,226
Total primary government expenses $19,859,922 $19,974,513 $17,380,004 $16,969,519
Program revenues
Governmental activities:
Charges for services:
General government $818,468 $520,231 $550,117 $562,816
Public safety 199,498 1,359,426 2,249,152 1,591,658
Public works 603,866 865,327 801,633 448,009
Culture and recreation - - - -
Community development - - - -
Operating grants and contributions 526,107 722,858 1,106,014 861,429
Capital grants and contributions 1,176,732 5,046,307 4,141,383 5,187,023
Total governmental activities program revenues 3,324,671 8,514,149 8,848,299 8,650,935
Business-type activities:
Charges for services:
Water 1,014,836 1,094,897 1,150,834 1,217,589
Sewer 1,621,633 1,659,322 1,698,963 1,753,712
Storm water - - - -
Operating grants and contributions 263,024 - - -
Capital grants and contributions 3,035,031 1,543,947 836,029 1,242,032
Total business-type activities 5,934,524 4,298,166 3,685,826 4,213,333
Total primary government program revenues $9,259,195 $12,812,315 $12,534,125 $12,864,268
138
Table 2
Page 1 of 2
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$2,466,130 $4,197,819 $2,828,407 $3,117,688 $3,041,049 $4,134,836
5,053,511 4,867,134 4,706,881 6,512,493 7,130,294 7,045,702
5,810,919 4,118,477 6,260,599 6,377,440 5,604,543 6,218,466
- - - 4,029,146 3,350,309 3,283,500
183,982 161,556 178,581 235,376 257,150 732,201
686,421 660,660 791,930 884,336 531,413 287,271
498,587 733,207 654,287 562,248 497,903 410,330
14,699,550 14,738,853 15,420,685 21,718,727 20,412,661 22,112,306
1,322,811 1,532,282 1,621,486 3,019,350 2,027,102 2,130,173
2,002,711 2,199,865 2,186,992 2,347,539 2,535,243 2,989,132
- - - 251,478 577,404 409,320
3,325,522 3,732,147 3,808,478 5,618,367 5,139,749 5,528,625
$18,025,072 $18,471,000 $19,229,163 $27,337,094 $25,552,410 $27,640,931
$612,237 $587,888 $892,386 $699,316 $507,564 $434,283
1,255,363 1,235,829 1,688,606 1,616,634 1,279,955 1,489,612
1,273,900 1,106,248 2,528,275 1,574,335 1,544,038 149,389
- - - 1,046,848 1,127,355 1,837,741
- - - - 10,000 -
870,532 2,470,024 1,019,752 1,119,449 1,866,131 1,480,903
6,820,419 6,894,207 7,931,093 2,800,604 2,996,602 8,609,291
10,832,451 12,294,196 14,060,112 8,857,186 9,331,645 14,001,219
1,172,580 1,341,559 1,683,290 1,845,312 2,323,763 2,072,108
1,771,143 1,803,231 1,892,040 1,952,299 2,079,761 2,186,487
- - - 486,069 552,121 559,217
- 42,152 - - 59,032 7,589
2,894,794 2,887,266 752,403 5,268,556 8,545 2,119,227
5,838,517 6,074,208 4,327,733 9,552,236 5,023,222 6,944,628
$16,670,968 $18,368,404 $18,387,845 $18,409,422 $14,354,867 $20,945,847
139
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2015 2016 2017 2018
Net (expense) revenue:
Governmental activities ($13,050,512) ($8,241,709) ($5,384,635) ($5,021,358)
Business-type activities 2,449,785 1,079,511 538,756 916,107
Total primary government, net (10,600,727) (7,162,198) (4,845,879)(4,105,251)
General revenues and other changes in net position:
Governmental activities:
Property taxes 9,243,236 9,343,500 9,753,971 10,229,691
Unrestricted grants and contributions 5,363 91,385 181,712 59,508
Unrestricted investment earnings 112,961 210,142 207,792 369,485
Gain on disposal of capital assets 17,836 66,255 38,022 17,318
Special item - withdrawal from fire district - 1,333,166 - -
Transfers 66,834 (914,414)(308,694)(472,370)
Total governmental activities 9,446,230 10,130,034 9,872,803 10,203,632
Business-type activities:
Unrestricted investment earnings 51,167 107,119 106,488 213,434
Gain on disposal of capital assets - - - -
Transfers (66,834) 914,414 308,694 472,370
Total business-type activities (15,667) 1,021,533 415,182 685,804
Total primary government $9,430,563 $11,151,567 $10,287,985 $10,889,436
Change in net position:
Governmental activities ($3,604,282) $1,888,325 $4,488,168 $5,182,274
Business-type activities 2,434,118 2,101,044 953,938 1,601,911
Total primary government change in net position ($1,170,164) $3,989,369 $5,442,106 $6,784,185
GASB 75 was implemented in 2017. OPEB expense for years prior to 2017 was not restated.
140
Table 2
Page 2 of 2
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
($3,867,099) ($2,444,657) ($1,360,573) ($12,861,541) ($11,081,016) ($8,111,087)
2,512,995 2,342,061 519,255 3,933,869 ($116,527) 1,416,003
(1,354,104) (102,596) (841,318) (8,927,672) (11,197,543) (6,695,084)
10,706,977 11,259,043 12,006,161 12,622,388 13,989,700 15,358,404
38,926 47,188 6,587 2,117,908 270,011 2,364
1,029,944 684,384 (171,260) (1,139,063) 1,554,657 1,517,537
68,472 150,041 387,972 66,852 35,689 143,601
- - - - - -
(1,311,593) (4,066,269) (109,774) (1,142,554) (516,310) (3,927,730)
10,532,726 8,074,387 12,119,686 12,525,531 15,333,747 13,094,176
523,554 383,963 (86,764) (645,918) 728,010 603,782
- - 29,012 - - -
1,311,593 4,066,269 109,774 1,142,554 516,310 3,927,730
1,835,147 4,450,232 52,022 496,636 1,244,320 4,531,512
$12,367,873 $12,524,619 $12,171,708 $13,022,167 $16,578,067 $17,625,688
$6,665,627 $5,629,730 $10,759,113 ($336,010) $4,252,731 $4,983,089
4,348,142 6,792,293 571,277 4,430,505 1,127,793 5,947,515
$11,013,769 $12,422,023 $11,330,390 $4,094,495 $5,380,524 $10,930,604
141
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
FUND BALANCES, GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2015 2016 2017 2018
General Fund:
Nonspendable $220,677 $225,114 $243,317 $286,186
Committed - - - -
Unassigned 5,725,736 6,031,077 6,573,608 6,599,956
Total general fund $5,946,413 $6,256,191 $6,816,925 $6,886,142
All other governmental funds:
Nonspendable 101,177 101,220 101,659 101,998
Restricted 2,637,638 6,502,424 5,289,641 9,824,255
Committed 163,239 170,950 175,401 182,613
Assigned 15,022,852 15,778,480 14,581,669 19,195,652
Unassigned (3,815,304)(978,496)(2,909,173)(2,935,459)
Total all other governmental funds $14,109,602 $21,574,578 $17,239,197 $26,369,059
Total all funds $20,056,015 $27,830,769 $24,056,122 $33,255,201
142
Table 3
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$296,907 $315,224 $356,619 $518,196 $567,849 $557,155
443,900 425,000 71,370 58,600 75,667 67,500
6,052,388 6,787,498 7,719,761 7,509,721 7,940,364 8,931,762
$6,793,195 $7,527,722 $8,147,750 $8,086,517 $8,583,880 $9,556,417
102,842 102,076 208,573 152,038 159,611 156,350
6,650,462 8,206,540 8,437,406 8,248,742 7,083,189 6,441,358
175,485 470,047 531,131 254,465 279,968 321,429
19,672,706 18,943,415 19,533,784 19,492,211 20,707,533 22,269,960
(3,171,161) (3,129,676) (2,931,318) (2,688,775) (2,797,128) (1,894,957)
$23,430,334 $24,592,402 $25,779,576 $25,458,681 $25,433,173 $27,294,140
$30,223,529 $32,120,124 $33,927,326 $33,545,198 $34,017,053 $36,850,557
143
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES, GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2015 2016 2017 2018
Revenues:
Property taxes $8,950,507 $9,369,090 $9,772,741 $10,215,761
Licenses and permits 551,202 895,581 1,447,571 1,260,046
Special assessments 703,141 4,400,635 2,283,974 2,005,970
Intergovernmental 679,627 706,944 1,080,953 3,453,300
Charges for services 696,501 1,293,556 1,327,781 1,003,896
Fines and forfeits 127,803 251,653 613,593 137,940
Investment earnings 112,915 210,142 207,792 369,485
Miscellaneous 766,072 417,448 410,640 323,379
Total revenues 12,587,768 17,545,049 17,145,045 18,769,777
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 1,643,966 1,845,667 1,952,669 1,948,909
Public safety 11,895,482 4,333,080 4,360,517 4,575,957
Public works 4,779,696 3,203,837 3,414,412 3,148,058
Culture and recreation - - - -
Conservation of natural resources 191,038 201,635 183,392 199,026
Community development 422,935 425,402 433,144 572,910
Capital outlay 1,566,057 3,044,615 2,152,848 3,469,208
Debt service:
Principal 2,802,511 2,769,525 8,058,525 3,130,600
Interest and fiscal charges 542,166 816,362 640,029 437,659
Bond issuance costs 62,831 98,906 - -
Total expenditures 23,906,682 16,739,029 21,195,536 17,482,327
Revenues over (under) expenditures (11,318,914)806,020 (4,050,491)1,287,450
Other financing sources (uses):
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 54,522 72,182 103,328 49,391
Insurace recovery - - - -
Issuance of debt 8,606,250 5,464,000 311,000 7,218,900
Premium on bonds issued 114,960 41,497 - 401,193
Transfers in 3,392,971 3,521,180 6,984,443 4,266,440
Transfers out (3,336,137)(3,241,959)(7,122,927)(4,024,295)
Total other financing sources (uses)8,832,566 5,856,900 275,844 7,911,629
Special item - withdrawal from fire district - 1,111,834 - -
Net change in fund balance ($2,486,348) $7,774,754 ($3,774,647) $9,199,079
Debt service as a percentage of
Noncapital expenditures 15.0% 26.2% 45.4% 25.5%
Debt service as a percentage of
Total expenditures 14.0% 21.4% 41.0% 20.4%
144
Table 4
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$10,685,592 $11,232,374 $12,063,089 $12,623,407 $13,986,847 $15,325,112
941,569 972,450 1,400,755 1,348,912 973,653 1,143,987
1,935,178 987,053 1,597,697 2,156,808 1,025,575 2,264,926
688,389 2,597,744 1,170,678 3,393,074 2,551,769 5,168,490
1,862,803 1,609,627 3,102,712 2,739,431 2,480,170 2,539,647
131,936 160,279 113,359 79,669 92,129 101,657
1,029,944 684,384 (171,260) (1,139,063) 1,554,657 1,517,537
265,130 246,599 508,253 906,901 934,718 144,436
17,540,541 18,490,510 19,785,283 22,109,139 23,599,518 28,205,792
2,007,741 3,412,600 2,257,879 2,504,260 2,426,747 3,108,922
4,720,122 4,744,173 5,027,661 5,792,661 6,282,216 6,558,432
3,538,624 3,083,366 2,929,603 3,308,439 3,083,106 2,383,537
- - - 3,723,278 2,933,374 2,839,288
207,919 160,884 182,247 224,980 249,955 255,761
680,419 665,405 822,007 914,055 514,318 739,702
7,444,939 6,387,441 5,499,595 3,582,771 5,721,645 9,277,960
2,815,075 2,855,000 3,149,000 2,324,360 2,439,885 2,115,475
562,471 629,282 699,782 662,078 602,744 513,966
- - 49,097 - - -
21,977,310 21,938,151 20,616,871 23,036,882 24,253,990 27,793,043
(4,436,769) (3,447,641) (831,588) (927,743) (654,472) 412,749
77,986 240,842 398,355 48,952 36,943 340,297
711,854 - - - - -
388,535 4,624,235 1,815,000 - - -
- 435,623 102,502 - - -
2,777,663 4,122,789 3,240,042 3,371,475 4,054,790 6,420,523
(2,550,941) (4,079,253) (2,917,109) (2,874,812) (2,965,406) (4,340,065)
1,405,097 5,344,236 2,638,790 545,615 1,126,327 2,420,755
- - - - - -
($3,031,672) $1,896,595 $1,807,202 ($382,128) $471,855 $2,833,504
23.2% 22.4% 24.0% 15.0% 16.4% 13.3%
15.4% 15.9% 18.7% 13.0% 12.5% 9.5%
145
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
ASSESSED AND ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY Table 5
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Estimated
Commercial/Total Taxable Taxable
Payable Residential Industrial Personal Assessed Total Direct Market
Year Property Property Property Value Tax Rate Value
2015 15,455,516 2,536,783 347,316 18,339,615 43.770 1,694,366,064
2016 15,472,329 2,609,482 359,006 18,440,817 46.019 1,699,288,883
2017 16,480,328 2,767,099 396,378 19,643,805 45.140 1,808,417,118
2018 17,879,879 2,966,548 442,867 21,289,294 42.826 1,959,826,108
2019 18,920,892 3,294,449 471,895 22,687,236 41.817 2,082,803,803
2020 20,781,383 3,686,997 419,457 24,887,837 39.870 2,299,471,394
2021 22,250,844 3,710,390 530,211 26,491,445 40.109 2,435,156,410
2022 23,932,066 3,587,941 388,342 27,908,349 40.154 2,587,650,762
2023 30,377,795 4,642,676 431,544 35,452,015 34.974 3,287,882,335
2024 32,389,089 6,066,250 390,827 38,846,166 36.090 3,524,450,903
The tax capacity (taxable assessed value) of the property is calculated by applying a statutory formula to the estimated market value of the property.
Source: Anoka County
146
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX CAPACITY RATES Table 6
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(rate per $100 of Tax Capacity)
General Centennial Other Total Direct and
Fiscal Basic Obligation Total School District Anoka Taxing Total Overlapping
Year Rate Debt Service Direct ISD # 12 County Districts Overlapping Tax Rate
2015 37.819 5.951 43.770 36.562 38.123 6.021 80.706 124.476
2016 35.025 10.994 46.019 36.426 38.894 6.405 81.725 127.744
2017 35.105 10.035 45.140 29.097 36.841 5.810 71.748 116.888
2018 36.168 6.658 42.826 34.970 35.334 5.658 75.962 118.788
2019 33.875 7.942 41.817 35.984 34.473 5.300 75.757 117.574
2020 31.803 8.067 39.870 34.059 33.078 5.048 72.185 112.055
2021 33.235 6.874 40.109 31.572 31.567 4.420 67.559 107.668
2022 33.262 6.892 40.154 31.074 29.254 4.624 64.952 105.106
2023 30.704 4.270 34.974 25.188 24.176 3.976 53.340 88.314
2024 32.806 3.292 36.098 23.564 25.629 3.412 52.605 88.703
The majority of the City is serviced by School District 12. Rates for debt service are based on each year's requirements.
Source: Anoka County
City Direct Rate Overlapping Rates
147
- This page intentionally left blank -
148
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS Table 7
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
Percentage Percentage
of Total City of Total City
Taxable Taxable Taxable Taxable
Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax
Taxpayer Capacity Rank Capacity Capacity Rank Capacity
OIVF III Clearwater, LLC $760,180 1 1.96% -$ -
Biynah MN WI LLC 491,824 2 1.27% - -
Target Corporation 292,628 3 0.75% 201,790 1 1.10%
Minnegasco Inc 285,708 4 0.74% - 0.00%
Gargaro Properties LLC 274,946 5 0.71% 85,130 7 0.46%
US Home LLC 244,594 6 0.63% - 0.00%
Lynglomsten at Lino Lakes, LLC 221,924 7 0.57% - 0.00%
Marmon/Keystone Corp 176,702 8 0.45% 73,342 8 0.40%
Tomas Commercial Real Estate Holdings LLC 158,352 9 0.41% - 0.00%
Kohls Illinois Inc 131,744 10 0.34% 96,836 6 0.53%
Xcel Energy - - 186,413 2 1.02%
Lino Lakes Realty LLC - - 175,742 3 0.96%
Molin Concrete Products - - 106,606 4 0.58%
Taylor Corporation - - 97,498 5 0.53%
Centerpoint Energy - - 69,458 9 0.38%
Lino Lakes Business Center LLC - - 56,928 10 0.31%
Total $3,038,602 7.82% $1,149,743 6.27%
Source: Anoka County
2024 2015
149
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Collected within the
Taxes Levied for the Fiscal Year Fiscal Year of Levy
Percentage
Fiscal Operating Debt Total Tax of
Year Tax Levy Tax Levy Levy Amount Levy
2015 $7,490,578 $1,195,494 $8,686,072 $8,630,830 99.4%
2016 7,018,572 2,039,856 9,058,428 9,022,964 99.6%
2017 7,360,431 2,131,424 9,491,855 9,439,688 99.5%
2018 8,165,859 1,610,873 9,776,732 9,729,472 99.5%
2019 8,193,124 1,862,292 10,055,416 9,981,243 99.3%
2020 8,368,756 2,122,762 10,491,518 10,415,622 99.3%
2021 9,232,367 1,909,448 11,141,815 11,055,781 99.2%
2022 9,790,843 2,028,444 11,819,287 11,777,785 99.6%
2023 11,319,531 1,574,384 12,893,915 12,823,280 99.5%
2024 12,833,204 1,287,724 14,120,928 13,967,447 98.9%
Current year levies and collections include State levy related credits, but do not include tax increment levies and collections.
150
Table 8
Total Collections to Date
Collections in Percentage Outstanding Percentage
Subsequent of Delinquent of Levy
Years Amount Levy Taxes Outstanding
$55,242 $8,686,072 100.0% - 0.0%
35,464 9,058,428 100.0% - 0.0%
52,167 9,491,855 100.0% - 0.0%
47,260 9,776,732 100.0% - 0.0%
74,173 10,055,416 100.0% - 0.0%
71,260 10,486,882 100.0%4,636 0.0%
83,958 11,139,739 100.0%2,076 0.0%
38,629 11,816,414 100.0%2,873 0.0%
52,751 12,876,031 99.9%17,884 0.1%
- 13,967,447 98.9%82,360 0.6%
151
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Governmental Activities
General Special Other
Fiscal Obligation Assessment Long-Term
Year Bonds Bonds Debt
2015 $16,377,291 $6,620,000 $1,720,000
2016 16,780,831 7,795,000 3,165,250
2017 12,896,518 4,905,000 2,174,725
2018 19,291,813 3,890,000 1,271,025
2019 18,057,829 2,855,000 1,064,485
2020 21,533,432 1,805,000 793,720
2021 21,551,462 845,000 434,720
2022 19,631,753 630,000 170,360
2023 17,467,043 415,000 35,475
2024 15,531,224 195,000 -
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements.
See the Demographic and Economic Statistics schedule for personal income and population data.
N/A - Personal income information is not yet available for 2024 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis Report
152
Table 9
Total Percentage Percentage
Primary of Assessed of Personal Per
Government Market Value Income Capita
$24,717,291 1.46%0.15%$1,205
27,741,081 1.63%0.17%1,334
19,976,243 1.10%0.12%946
24,452,838 1.25%0.14%1,145
21,977,314 1.03%0.12%999
24,132,152 1.05%0.12%1,128
22,831,182 0.94%0.11%1,075
20,432,113 0.79%0.09%943
17,917,518 0.54%0.08%815
15,726,224 0.45%N/A 705
153
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT
Last Ten Fiscal Years
General Special Total
Fiscal Obligation Assessment Primary
Year Bonds Bonds Government
2015 $16,377,291 $6,620,000 $22,997,291
2016 16,780,831 7,795,000 24,575,831
2017 12,896,518 4,905,000 17,801,518
2018 19,291,813 3,890,000 23,181,813
2019 18,057,829 2,855,000 20,912,829
2020 21,533,432 1,805,000 23,338,432
2021 21,551,462 845,000 22,396,462
2022 19,631,753 630,000 20,261,753
2023 17,467,043 415,000 17,882,043
2024 15,531,224 195,000 15,726,224
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements.
See the Demographic and Economic Statistics schedule for population data.
Governmental Activities
154
Table 10
Less: Amounts Percentage
Per Available in Debt Net of Assessed Per
Capita (Total) Service Funds Bonded Debt Market Value Capita (Net)
$1,121 $2,813,226 $20,184,065 1.19%$984
1,181 8,420,263 17,711,818 1.04%851
843 5,171,905 14,570,863 0.81%690
1,086 4,456,461 19,794,252 1.01%927
951 4,772,799 17,034,565 0.80%774
1,091 5,399,895 18,595,307 0.81%869
1,055 5,241,849 17,154,613 0.70%808
936 5,147,106 15,114,647 0.58%698
814 4,428,778 13,453,265 0.41%612
705 3,778,075 11,948,149 0.34%535
155
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT Table 11
As of December 31, 2024
Estimated
Estimated Share of
Debt Percentage Overlapping
Outstanding Applicable*Debt
Overlapping debt:
Anoka County $26,490,000 6.4%$1,688,976
ISD 12 (Centennial)72,363,676 43.3%31,351,780
ISD 624 (White Bear Lake)423,440,000 3.6%15,123,583
ISD 831 (Forest Lake)166,915,000 6.8%11,429,505
Metropolitan Council 191,435,000 0.6%1,189,386
Total overlapping 60,783,229
City of Lino Lakes direct debt 16,286,285 100% 16,286,285
Total direct and overlapping debt $77,069,514
*For debt repaid with property taxes, the percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed
property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's taxable
assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total taxable assessed value.
Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule
estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses
of the City. This process recognizes that, when considering the City's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt
burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply that every taxpayer
is a resident, and therefore responsible for repaying the debt, of each overlapping government.
Source: Anoka County/City of Lino Lakes Official Statements
156
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION Table 12
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Debt limit:
Market value $3,613,469,300
Applicable percentage 3%
Statutory debt limit 108,404,079
Debt applicable to limit:
Total bonded debt 16,942,509
Less:
Special assessment bonds (195,000)
Utility revenue bonds (5,006,285)
Total debt applicable to limit 11,741,224
Legal debt margin $96,662,855
Net Debt
Net Debt Legal Amount of Debt Applicable
Fiscal Debt Applicable to Debt Applicable to to Limit
Year Population Limit Limit Margin Debt Limit Per Capita
2015 20,519 50,830,982 11,941,250 38,889,732 23.49% 582
2016 20,803 50,978,666 10,122,081 40,856,585 19.86% 487
2017 21,117 54,252,514 10,426,243 43,826,271 19.22% 494
2018 21,347 58,794,783 14,497,838 44,296,945 24.66% 679
2019 21,995 65,496,045 13,637,314 51,858,731 20.82% 620
2020 21,399 71,534,937 13,217,152 58,317,785 18.48% 618
2021 21,236 76,205,334 13,901,182 62,304,152 18.24% 655
2022 21,658 80,410,830 12,287,889 68,122,941 15.28% 567
2023 21,976 100,724,793 11,097,080 89,627,713 11.02% 505
2024 22,322 108,404,079 11,741,224 96,662,855 10.83% 526
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Years 2015 Through 2024
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2024
157
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Table 13
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(2) (2)
Personal Per
Income Capita (3)(4)
Fiscal (1)(thousands Personal School Unemployment
Year Population of dollars)Income Enrollment Rate
2015 20,519 $16,033,898 $46,281 7,002 3.6%
2016 20,803 16,466,131 47,119 6,995 3.9%
2017 21,117 17,270,969 48,830 7,122 3.2%
2018 21,347 18,035,585 50,439 7,177 3.2%
2019 21,995 18,995,474 52,535 7,190 3.1%
2020 21,399 20,290,309 55,673 7,274 5.2%
2021 21,236 21,678,422 59,002 7,103 2.7%
2022 21,658 22,268,689 60,371 7,089 2.8%
2023 21,976 23,439,608 62,935 7,059 2.5%
2024 22,322 Not available Not available Not available 2.5%
Sources:
(1) Estimates from Metropolitan Council, except for 2020 which is per the U.S. Census and 2022 which is a city estimate
(2) Information from Bureau of Economic Analysis Report. Anoka County statistics used as local information is unavailable.
(3) Information from ISD #12 Financial Statements and Supplementary Information
(4) Information from MN Department of Employment and Economic Development. Anoka County statistics used as local
information is unavailable.
158
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS Table 14
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
Percentage Percentage
of Total City of Total City
Employer Employees Rank Employment(1)Employees Rank Employment(1)
State of Minnesota Corrections 473 1 19.9% 447 1 22.4%
Molin Concrete 350 2 14.7% 200 3 10.0%
ISD 12 - Centennial School District 321 3 13.5% 391 2 19.6%
Target Corporation 320 4 13.4% 130 7 6.5%
Northern Wholesale 201 5 8.4% - 0.0%
Distribution Alternatives 190 6 8.0% - 0.0%
City of Lino Lakes 179 7 7.5% - 0.0%
North American Composites, Inc 157 8 6.6% - 0.0%
Rehbein Transit, Inc.95 9 4.0% 130 8 6.5%
Anoka County Juvenile Center 93 10 3.9% 130 6 6.5%
Curtis 1000 - 162 4 8.1%
Taylor Corporation - 160 5 8.0%
Kohls - 123 9 6.2%
YMCA - 120 10 6.0%
Total 2,379 1,993
(1)The statistic for total City employment is not available, therefore the percentage represents the percentage of
the top ten listed.
2024 2015
159
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2015 2016 2017 2018
General government:
Administration 3.50 4.00 4.00 4.00
Finance 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.25
Planning and zoning 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total general government 7.50 8.50 8.50 8.25
Public safety:
Police - sworn officers 26.00 27.00 27.00 27.00
Police - civilians 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.00
Fire 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50
Building inspection 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50
Total public safety 33.00 35.50 35.50 35.00
Public works:
Streets 7.00 6.50 6.65 6.65
Fleet 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50
Government buildings - - - -
Total public works 8.00 8.00 8.15 8.15
Culture and recreation:
Parks 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20
Recreation 3.20 2.20 2.35 1.35
Rookery activity center - - - -
Total culture and recreation 8.40 7.40 7.55 6.55
Conservation of natural resources:
Environmental 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Solid waste abatement 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Forestry 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Total conservation of natural resources 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community development 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water 2.30 2.30 2.70 3.33
Sewer 2.30 2.30 2.70 3.33
Storm water - - - -
Total 64.50 67.00 68.10 67.60
Source: City Finance Office
Full-Time-Equivalent Employees as of December 31,
160
Table 15
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00
3.25 3.10 3.10 2.60 2.60 2.60
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8.25 8.10 9.10 8.60 7.60 8.60
27.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 27.70
4.00 4.00 5.00 5.50 5.50 6.85
1.50 1.50 1.50 6.50 6.50 2.45
3.50 3.50 3.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
36.00 36.00 38.00 44.50 44.50 41.50
6.65 6.50 6.25 6.15 6.25 6.25
1.50 1.50 2.20 2.45 2.55 2.55
- - - - 0.15 0.15
8.15 8.00 8.45 8.60 8.95 8.95
5.20 5.20 4.95 5.35 5.60 5.60
1.35 0.20 - 0.10 - -
- - - 7.50 7.00 7.00
6.55 5.40 4.95 12.95 12.60 12.60
0.35 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.30
0.30 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.20
0.35 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.25
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75
2.00 2.00 2.00 1.70 1.70 2.70
3.33 3.25 3.25 4.05 4.05 4.05
3.33 3.25 3.25 4.05 4.05 4.05
- - - 1.80 1.80 1.80
68.60 67.00 70.00 87.00 86.00 85.00
Full-Time-Equivalent Employees as of December 31,
161
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2015 2016 2017 2018
General government:
Elections 1 2 1 2
Registered voters 12,143 13,636 12,624 12,860
Number of votes cast 4,085 11,562 2,165 10,738
Voter participation (registered)33.6%84.8%17.1%83.5%
Public safety:
Police:
Calls for service 6,210 6,210 (2)(2)
Traffic citations and warnings 2,199 2,199 (2)(2)
Part I crime rate 1,226 1,091 (2)(2)
Part II crime rate 2,395 3,635 (2)(2)
Police:
Case numbers generated 16,321 18,199 14,487
Avg response time (emergency & non-emergency)5:26 minutes 4:42 minutes 5:16 minutes
Part I crime offenses 224 176 195
Part II crime offenses 746 808 587
Group A
Group B
Clearance rate 1 82%69%
Fire:
Fire call load 269 316 356
Fire property loss 694,000 $325,100 $205,200
Fire property saved 10,511,300 $6,342,100 $1,791,500
Fire inspections 53 117 107
Building inspections:
Building permits 654 761 5,422 (1)3,281
Value of building permits $26,570,593 $53,390,619 $50,984,047 $50,990,945
Other permits (4)$880 985 1,023
Public works:
General maintenance (hours)7,839 5,534 6,313 420
Street maintenance (hours)3,347 4,053 3,765 12,418
Fleet maintenance (hours)4,322 4,437 3,986 2,648
Snow plowing/sanding (hours)754 960 928 2,117
Culture and recreation:
Park maintenance (hours)8,332 9,698 8,576 9,027
Utilities:
Water maintenance (hours)3,240 3,539 3,278 4,080
Sewer maintenance (hours)3,240 3,539 3,278 4,080
Storm water maintenance (hours)- - - -
(1) Increase in permits issued due to June 2017 storm damage.
(2) The Public Safety Department modified the metrics maintained for business purposes in 2016.
(3) Transition to FBI Uniform Crime Reporting NIBRS (National Incident Based Reporting System) in 2019.
January -July 2019 SRS, August-Dec 2019 NIBRS.
(4) Other permits (plumbing, mechanical, etc.) data included in 2020 and presented retroactively back to 2016.
Source: Various City Departments
162
Table 16
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
141223
13,312 14,964 14,441 15,082 14,835 15,322
3,075 13,505 1,873 10,584 1,785 14,135
23.1% 90.2% 13.0% 70.2% 12.0% 92.3%
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
13,973 13,214 12,138 12,570 14,488 13,822
5:53 minutes 6:41 minutes 6:46 minutes 6:11 minutes 6:13 minutes 6:07 minutes
93 (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)
304 (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)
266 (3) 778 729 555 449 409
98 (3) 217 182 195 359 238
60% 48% 56% 53% 71% 62%
379 371 399 585 825 809
$246,600 $241,450 $148,683 $1,487,543 $1,187,408 $2,424,018
$7,548,100 $13,682,450 $1,251,340 $5,560,915 $24,954,556 $8,559,024
98 60 116 38 157 95
1,107 882 969 796 833 847
$41,766,531 $51,686,278 $90,354,190 $103,040,207 $55,685,801 $77,382,798
1,183 1,254 1,451 1,749 1,101 990
7,420 5,407 6,851 6,510 5,389 6,072
4,328 4,317 4,622 3,588 4,491 4,343
3,504 3,390 3,483 3,213 3,542 3,610
2,130 1,232 1,204 1,962 1,471 929
9,610 8,113 8,818 9,406 9,104 10,949
3,944 3,645 4,196 3,998 3,731 4,261
3,944 3,645 4,196 3,998 3,731 4,261
- - - 1,760 674 1,300
163
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Table 17
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Public works:
Lights 673 815 838 854 859 859 859 859 925 950
Vehicles 29 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 32 35
City streets (miles)100.7 100.7 100.7 106.9 108.2 104.6 (1) 106.3 108.4 109.1 110.6
Culture and recreation:
Parks:
Asphalt trails (miles)26.0 29.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 (2) 29.0 30.2 30.2 3.5
Boardwalk (miles)0 (2) - 0.3 0.3 0.3
Concrete trails (miles)7.0 (2) 8.0 10.3 10.3 10.3
Baseball/Softball fields 20 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Basketball courts 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Fishing pier 1 1 - - - - - - - -
Park acres 141 140 147 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Park shelters 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8
Parks 18 17 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19
Pickleball courts - - - 1 1 1 1 5 7 7
Playgrounds 16 15 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Skating rinks 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Soccer fields 8 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Tennis courts 2 2 - - 1 1 1 3 3 3
Water:
Distribution system (miles)74.7 85.6 99.4 89.0 89.5 91.8 94.2 97.6 99.2 101
Water connections 4,542 4,649 4,738 4,919 4,990 5,175 5,324 5,520 5,608 5,814
Gallons pumped (millions)449 452 494 508 493 547 630 623 736 536
Water tower capacity (millions gallons) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Number of fire hydrants 1,024 1,024 1,028 942 937 1,013 1,046 1,097 1,116 1306
Sewer:
Collection system (miles)77.9 77.9 87.0 79.5 80.1 80.1 82.8 85.4 86.3 89.98
Sewer connections 4,685 4,817 4,976 5,102 5,276 5,439 5,650 5,833 6,028 6,016
Storm water:
Pipe (miles)41.4 53.7 54.1 55.0 55.6 49.9 (1) 53.5 54.2 55.4 55.75
Ponds 305 309
Source: Various City Departments
(1) Decrease due to reclassification of ownership.
(2) In 2020, trails were broken out between asphalt trail, concrete sidewalk, and boardwalk.
164
400 Robert Street North, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN, 55101 651.426.7000 www.redpathcpas.com
COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 2024. Professional standards
require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted
auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to
the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information in our
letter to you dated January 24, 2025. Professional standards also require that we communicate to
you the following information related to our audit.
Significant Audit Matters
Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The
significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the financial
statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies
was not changed during 2024, except that the City implemented Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. The implementation of this
standard did not have a material effect on the financial statements. We noted no transactions
entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or
consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the
proper period.
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management
and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and
assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because
of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events
affecting them may differ significantly from those expected.
The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements are the estimates used to calculate
the net pension liability, the pension related deferred outflows and inflows of resources, and
pension expense. These estimates are based on actuarial studies. We evaluated the key factors
and assumptions used to develop the estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation
to the financial statements taken as a whole.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Communication With Those Charged With Governance
Page 2
Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to
financial statement users. Determining sensitivity is subjective, however, we believe the
disclosures most likely to be considered sensitive are Note 6 – Long-Term Debt, Note 10A –
Deficit Fund Balances and Note 15A – Litigation.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit
We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our
audit.
Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified
during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the
appropriate level of management. There were no uncorrected misstatements that have an effect
on our opinion on the financial statements. The uncorrected misstatements or the matters
underlying them could potentially cause future period financial statements to be materially
misstated, even though, in our judgment, such uncorrected misstatements are immaterial to the
financial statements under audit. There were no corrected misstatements identified during the
audit.
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting
or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the
financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements
arose during the course of our audit.
Management Representations
We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the
management representation letter dated May 22, 2025.
Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and
accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a
consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or
a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our
professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the
consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with
other accountants.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Communication With Those Charged With Governance
Page 3
Other Audit Findings or Issues
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and
auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors.
However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and
our responses were not a condition to our retention.
Other Matters
We applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion and analysis, the
budgetary comparison schedules, and the schedules of OPEB and pension information, which are
required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our
procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the
information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our
inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the
basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide
any assurance on the RSI.
We were engaged to report on the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements
and schedules, which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. With respect to this
supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form,
content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of
preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and
complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the
supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial
statements or to the financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on the introductory and statistical sections, which accompany the
financial statements but are not RSI. Such information has not been subjected to auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not
express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
Restriction on Use
This information is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and
management of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota and is not intended to be, and should not be,
used by anyone other than these specified parties.
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LLC
St. Paul, Minnesota
May 22, 2025
400 Robert Street North, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN, 55101 651.426.7000 www.redpathcpas.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT
OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT
AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial
statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the
aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which
collectively comprise the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s basic financial statements, and have
issued our report thereon dated May 22, 2025.
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of
expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s internal control.
Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to
prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements, on a timely basis. A material weakness is a
deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented,
or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet
important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph
of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be
material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did
not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses.
However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s
financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance
with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However,
providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and
accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances
of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing
Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s
internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other
purpose.
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LLC
St. Paul, Minnesota
May 22, 2025
400 Robert Street North, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN, 55101 651.426.7000 www.redpathcpas.com
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the
governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate
remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively
comprise the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s basic financial statements, and have issued our
report thereon dated May 22, 2025.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City
of Lino Lakes, Minnesota failed to comply with the provisions of the contracting – bid laws,
depositories of public funds and public investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness,
claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing sections of the
Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant
to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was
not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had
we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions, insofar as
they relate to accounting matters.
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the
results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this
communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
REDPATH AND COMPANY, LLC
St. Paul, Minnesota
May 22, 2025
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 4
STAFF ORGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
DATE OF WORK SESSION: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
At the Work Session, staff will present the June 9, 2025 Council staff report.
The applicant, Java Companies, Inc., submitted a land use application for Java Addition 2nd
Addition preliminary plat. The preliminary plat subdivides Lot 2, Block 1, Java Lino Lakes into
two (2) separate lots.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
None. Discussion only.
ATTACHMENTS
1. June 9, 2025 Council Staff Report
1
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 7B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: June 9, 2025
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 25-77 Approving Java Lino Lakes 2nd
Addition Preliminary Plat
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
______________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Java Companies, Inc., submitted a land use application for Java Addition 2nd
Addition preliminary plat. The preliminary plat subdivides Lot 2, Block 1, Java Lino Lakes into
two (2) separate lots.
Tentative Review Schedule:
Complete Application Date: April 15, 2025
60-Day Deadline: June 14, 2025
Environmental Board Meeting: April 30, 2025
Park Board Meeting: N/A
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: May 14, 2025
City Council Work Session: June 2, 2025
City Council Meeting: June 9, 2025
BACKGROUND
On April 14, 2025, the City Council passed Resolution No. 25-45 approving the Java Lino Lakes
final plat. The plat created three (3) commercial lots along Lake Drive. Lot 2, Block 1, Java Lino
Lakes was proposed to have a 3 unit multi-tenant retail building. The applicant is now proposing
to subdivide this lot into 2 lots for the purpose of constructing a standalone Chipotle Restaurant
and a standalone Pacific Dental office. Lot 1, Block 1, Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition will still be an
O’Reilly’s Auto Parts retail store as originally planned.
This staff report is based on the following information:
2
• Certificate of Survey prepared by Design Tree dated September 9, 2024
• Preliminary Plat prepared by Design Tree dated March 28, 2025
• Lino Lakes 2.0 2nd Addition Plan Set prepared by Design Tree dated March 28, 2025
• Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec dated October
7, 2024
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
A majority of the 3 acre site was previously owned by the City of Lino Lakes and was
temporarily used for the community gardens. These lots have now been sold to Java
Companies, LLC for development.
Zoning and Land Use
The site was zoned GB, General Business per Ordinance No. 17-24 and is guided commercial per
the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A restaurant, office business-clinical, and retail store are
permitted uses.
Current Zoning GB, General Business
Existing Land Use Vacant Commercial
Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Commercial
Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use
North GB, General Business Commercial Commercial
South GB, General Business Commercial Commercial
East GB, General Business
R-4, High Density
Commercial
Multi-family
Commercial
Planned
Commercial/Residential
West R-1, Single Family Residential Residential
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
3
The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development
and zoning code requirements for GB, General Business lot size and lot width.
Lot Size Lot Width
GB Requirements 20,000 sf 100 ft
Lot 1a 65,550 sf 108 ft
Lot 2 29,751 sf 100 ft
Lot 3 36,474 sf 220 ft
aLot 1, Block 1 Java Lino Lakes was 70,130sf and is the proposed O-Reilly’s retail auto parts sales
lot. Lot 1, Block 1, Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition slightly reduces the lot size to 65,550 sf. Lot
width and lot size requirements are met. O-Reilly’s is still proposed on this lot.
Blocks and Lots
The proposed Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat contains the following areas:
Parcel Acres Purpose
Lot 1, Block 1 1.50 acres Retail auto part sales
(O-Reilly’s Auto Parts)
Lot 2, Block 1 0.68 acres Office-Business Clinic
(Pacific Dental)
Lot 3, Block 1 0.84 acres Restaurant
(Chipotle)
TOTAL 3.02 acres
No additional road right-of-way is required. An additional 10ft of road right-of-way along Lake
Drive was dedicated with Java Lino Lakes final plat.
Streets and Alleys
CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an A-Minor Arterial Reliever county road. A raised median exists from
the American Legion south past I-35W. A signalized intersection exists at Marketplace Drive. No
additional access points or driveways are allowed onto Lake Drive along this section.
77th Street is a minor collector local road. The section of 77th Street shown on the preliminary
plat was vacated in November 2024 via Ordinance No. 14-24.
Marketplace Drive will be extended west and connect to Marilyn Drive and 77th Street. The City
Engineer (WSB) has completed the plans and specs for this street reconstruction and utilities
4
project. The City will construct and install utilities in conjunction with the platting and
commercial development project.
The American Legion (7731 Lake Drive) currently has a “frontage road” that was intended to
provide additional access to the lots to the south. Staff consulted with the American Legion and
they did not feel the additional access was needed. An existing city stormwater basin also exists
at the end of the frontage road adding site constraints to the possible frontage road extension.
A future shared driveway be considered along the west lot line of the American Legion and Java
Lino Lakes 2nd Addition.
There are no other public roads being proposed with the development. Shared driveway and
maintenance agreements have been recorded for all private driveways and joint off-street
parking areas in conjunction with Java Lino Lakes.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along the lot
lines.
Public Land Dedication
The City collected cash fee per acre in lieu of land dedication for the commercial development
with Java Lino Lakes final plat. No additional commercial acreage is being added to the plat;
therefore, no additional fees shall be collected.
Site and Building Plan Review
A restaurant, office business-clinic, and retail store are permitted uses in the GB, General
Business district; therefore, site and building plans will be reviewed administratively by staff.
Grading Plan and Stormwater Management
Per the City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025:
Stormwater management for the Lino Retail 2.0 site consists of infiltration basins for the
southern and northern lots. Additionally, some stormwater infrastructure is proposed for the
City realignment of Marketplace Drive. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized
below.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt
Existing 2.37 5.53 14.27 Needed if basins
landlocked
5
Currently
Proposed 1.65 4.77 10.86 Needed if basins
landlocked
Additional comments/revisions are noted in the attached City Engineer memo.
Public Utilities
The commercial development will be municipally served by a 21” sanitary sewer main along
Lake Drive and a 10” sanitary sewer main along the extended Marketplace Drive.
The commercial development will be municipally served by a 12” watermain along Lake Drive
and a 12” watermain along the extended Marketplace Drive.
Tree Preservation, Mitigation Standards and Landscaping
The April 30, 2025 Environmental Board staff report details tree preservation, mitigation
standards and landscaping. Open area, canopy cover, and foundation landscaping requirements
are met. Parking lot screening shall be provided.
Signage
A separate Sign Permit Application with detailed sign information is required for any permanent
or temporary signage.
Impervious Surface Coverage
Impervious surface coverage will be reviewed during site and building plan review for each lot.
Traffic Study
Traffic was analyzed with the Java Lino Lakes preliminary and final plat. In August 2020, Anoka
County Highway Department completed a CSAH 23 Preliminary Traffic Analysis from Lexington
Avenue to Main Street. The analysis included the intersection of CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) and
Marketplace Drive. The proposed preliminary plat and commercial development are consistent
with that plan.
EQB Environmental Review
An EAW is not required for a three (3) lot commercial development.
Wetlands
There are no wetlands on site.
6
Shoreland District
The site is not located in the Shoreland District.
Floodplain
There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments
Anoka County Highway Department
Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the preliminary plat and had no additional
comments.
Public Safety Comments
The Lino Lakes Police Division reviewed the development and did not have any comments.
The Lino Lakes Fire Division reviewed the development. A fire hydrant shall be installed
between Lot 1 and Lot 2.
Environmental Board
The Environmental Board reviewed the project at their April 30, 2025 meeting and made
recommendation with conditions as noted in the attached memo.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on May 14, 2025. There were no public
comments. The Board recommended approval with a 7-0 vote.
Agreements
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained, and a Declaration for Maintenance of
Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the
City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration.
Development Agreement and Final Plat
The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A
Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application.
7
Site Improvement Performance Agreement
Site Improvement Performance Agreements will be required for the construction of the
commercial buildings.
Comprehensive Plan
The Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan regarding land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local
water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails.
Land Use Plan
The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The preliminary plat is
consistent with commercial land use.
Housing Plan
The goals and policies of the Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the three (3) lot
commercial preliminary plat.
Economic Development
The three (3) lot commercial preliminary plat supports the City’s economic development plan.
Transportation Plan
Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that streets and roads are as safe as possible and
to reduce unnecessary traffic. CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) is an A-Minor Arterial Reliever county road.
77th Street/Marketplace Drive is a Minor Collector road. The exiting road system can
accommodate the traffic generated by the three (3) lot commercial preliminary plat.
Local Water Management Plan
The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface
and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water
systems. The commercial development will construct stormwater management BMP’s such as
curb, gutter, and stormwater ponds.
Sanitary Sewer Plan
8
The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an
affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The three (3) lot commercial preliminary plat will be
served by an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system.
Water Supply Plan
A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable
water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The three (3) lot
commercial preliminary plat will be served with a safe and high quality water supply.
Parks, Greenways and Trails
A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and
fund recreational activities in the City. The City collected cash in lieu of land dedication with
the Java Lino Lakes final plat.
Findings of Fact
The findings of fact are detailed in the attached resolution.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Java Lino Lakes Final Plat
2. Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat
3. City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025
4. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated May 5, 2025
5. Resolution No. 25-77 Approving Preliminary Plat
JAVA LINO LAKES
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Java Lino Retail 2.0 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property:
All that part of the Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Section 8; thence West on the South line thereof 121.88 feet; thence North 20 degrees
38 minutes East 1312.3 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land hereby to be described; thence continuing North 20 degrees 38 minutes East a distance of 105.9
feet, more or less, to the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence East along the North line thereof 369.4 feet, more or less, to the west line of
Trunk Highway Number 8 as the same is now laid out and constructed; thence southwesterly of the Westerly line of said Highway 146.3 feet, more or less, to a point
distance 1320 feet Northerly as measured along the Westerly line of Highway from its intersection with the South line of said Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter;
thence Northwesterly to point of beginning, subject to right of public over the North 33 feet thereof for road purposes, being now known as Lot 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION
NUMBER 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with streets and alleys adjacent thereto, vacated or to be vacated.
AND
Lot Five (5), AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom Parcel 19, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.
17.
AND
Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 134, excepting therefrom Parcel 20, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 17, Anoka County, Minnesota.
AND
That part of 77th Street lying in the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, bounded as follows:
Lying north of Lot 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 134, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Anoka County; lying east of the northerly extension of the West line
of said Lot 3; lying west of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 17, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Anoka County and lying south of the
North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter.
And that the City of Lino Lakes, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, owners of the following described property:
Lot 12 and 13, Block 2, CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota.
AND
All that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW ¼ of SE ¼) of Section Eight (8), Township, Thirty-one (31), Range Twenty-two (22), Anoka County,
Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE ¼ of SW ¼) of Section Eight (8); thence West on
the South line thereof one hundred twenty-two and 88/100 (122.88) feet; thence North twenty degrees, thirty-eight minutes (20 degrees 38 minutes) East twelve hundred
forty-one and three-tenths (1241.3) feet, to the point of beginning of the tract of land hereby to be described; thence continuing North twenty degrees, thirty-eight minutes (20
degrees 38 minutes) East, a distance of seventy-one (71) feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Westerly line of Trunk Highway No. 8 as same is now laid out and
constructed, distance thirteen hundred twenty (1320) feet Northerly as measured on the Westerly line of said Trunk Highway No. 8, from the point of intersection with the
South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW ¼ of SE ¼); thence Southeasterly along said Westerly line one hundred eight and six-tenths (108.6) feet;
thence Westerly to the point of beginning.
Now known as Lot Four (4), AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 134, according to the recorded plat thereof and situated in Anoka County, Minnesota.
Excepting therefrom Parcel No. 18, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.17.
AND
That part of 77th Street lying in CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, bounded as follows:
Lying east of the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 12, Block 2, said CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND ADDITION; lying south of the south line of said Lot 12; lying north of
the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22 and lying west of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT
NO. 17, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Anoka County.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JAVA LINO LAKES and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility
easements as created by this plat. Also dedicating to the County of Anoka the right of access on County State Highway Number 23 as shown on the plat.
In witness whereof said Java Lino Retail 2.0 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this_______ day of
___________________________, 20____.
JAVA LINO RETAIL 2.0 LLC
______________________________________
Mark Richard Krogh, Manager
STATE OF ___________________
COUNTY OF ___________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this __________ day of ___________________________, 20____ by Mark Richard Krogh, Manager of Java Lino Retail 2.0
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company.
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Print Name)
Notary Public, ____________________County, Minnesota
My commission expires _________________________
In witness whereof said City of Lino Lakes, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer
this_______ day of _____________________, 20____.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
______________________________________
Mayor, City of Lino Lakes
STATE OF ___________________
COUNTY OF ___________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this __________ day of ___________________________, 20____ by ___________________________, Mayor of the City of
Lino Lakes, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation.
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Print Name)
Notary Public, ____________________County, Minnesota
My commission expires _________________________
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I Jonathan D. Schuette do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that
this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat
have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this
certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this ______day of ___________________________, 20____.
______________________________________
Jonathan D. Schuette, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 45352
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ___________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me this __________ day of ___________________________, 20____ by Jonathan D. Schuette.
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Print Name)
Notary Public, ____________________County, Minnesota
My commission expires _________________________
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
This plat of JAVA LINO LAKES was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this_______ day of
___________________________, 20____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
By ______________________________________ Mayor By ______________________________________ Clerk
COUNTY SURVEYOR
I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this_______ day of
___________________________, 20____,
By ______________________________________
David M. Zieglmeier
Anoka County Surveyor
COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20____ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and tranfer entered this __________ day of ___________________________, 20____.
______________________________________
Property Tax Administrator
By ______________________________________ , Deputy
COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES
COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that this plat of JAVA LINO LAKES was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this _______ day of
___________________________, 20____, at ____________o'clock _____.M. and was duly recorded as Document Number ___________________________.
_____________________________________
County Recorder/Registrar of Titles
By ______________________________________ , Deputy
City of Lino Lakes
County of Anoka
Sec. 8, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets
Attachment 1. Java Lino Lakes Final Plat
115
.
6
4
S71°53'
2
6
"
W
23.85
N2
1
°
2
3
'
4
6
"
E
3
1
9
.
2
2
N65
°
0
0
'
2
9
"
W
2
8
8
.
6
9
N89°26'22"W
0.72
R=5751.85
Δ=2°46'41"
L=278.87
S2
5
°
0
6
'
3
1
"
W
41
.
3
0
S89°15'13"E
22.75
N64
°
4
5
'
4
2
"
W
1
8
1
.
2
8
N64
°
4
5
'
4
2
"
W
1
7
4
.
2
4
R
=
2
9
0.0
0
Δ
=20°06'41"
L=101.79
R
=
210.00
Δ=17°52'59"
L=65.54
N
1
8
°
4
9
'
3
7
"
W
2
9
.
6
8
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
2
9
5
.
8
3
240
.
1
3
188
.
5
0
85
.
8
8
14
.
1
9
85
.
8
8
21
9
.
1
5
N2
5
°
0
6
'
3
1
"
E
41.
3
2
Δ=1°10'16"
L=117.76
Δ=1°21'49"
L=137.14
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
4
2
8
.
6
3
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
2
9
0
.
3
6
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
8
0
.
6
6
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
8
9
.
2
7
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
2
6
4
.
7
1
S2
4
°
5
2
'
0
4
"
W
9
4
.
9
2
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
22.
4
5
S2
5
°
3
6
'
3
2
"
W
1
4
1
.
0
1
138
.
8
9
30.0
3
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
4
9
.
6
4
19.
6
2
30.
0
2
N2
1
°
2
3
'
4
6
"
E
8
6
.
9
7
N71°35'
2
4
"
E
24.41
S64
°
4
5
'
4
2
"
E
4
1
.
1
7
N25
°
1
4
'
1
8
"
E
14.
5
2
39.1
2
S1
5
°
2
6
'
5
7
"
E
8
1
.
5
3
62.
2
7
177
.
8
6
149
.
8
7
38.
6
3
71
.
0
0
71
.
0
0
77
.
1
5
10.
0
0
278
.
6
9
N2
1
°
2
3
'
4
6
"
E
1
0
9
9
.
0
0
(N
2
0
°
3
8
'
E
)
S5
9
°
2
0
'
2
6
"
E
6
5
.
2
8
S64
°
5
2
'
2
2
"
E
1
6
8
.
9
2
S63
°
4
0
'
5
6
"
E
5
0
.
6
8
N2
5
°
4
9
'
0
0
"
E
8
3
.
6
2
58.
6
0
N
4
6
°
5
2
'
4
3
"
W
43
.
0
6
CH BRG=S30°31'43"W
C H=248.50
R=5761.85
Δ=2°28'17"
L=248.52
Δ=2°23'19"
L=240.21
Δ=0°04'58"
L=8.31
R=5761.85
Δ=4°11'03"
L=420.78
Δ=0°12'36"
L=21.11
R=5761.85
Δ=1°26'22"
L=144.77
59.
9
4
23
5
.
8
9
239.
5
7
N84°09'30"W
17.27
S2
6
°
1
7
'
5
2
"
W
1
4
5
.
3
6
Δ=2°10'02"
L=217.95
N89°14'14"W 121.88
0 40'80'
FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT, THE
NORTHEAST LINE OF LOT 13, BLOCK 2
CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, ANOKA
COUNTY, MINNESOTA IS ASSUMED TO HAVE
A BEARING OF SOUTH 58°07'27"E
JAVA LINO LAKES
= DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON
PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
= DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18
INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT
SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352
= DENOTES RECORD MEASUREMENT
= DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED
TO ANOKA COUNTY
=DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON
MONUMENT
= DENOTES SET MAGNETIC NAIL
(SCALE IN FEET)
City of Lino Lakes
County of Anoka
Sec. 8, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
LOT 1
BLOCK ONE
LOT 1
BLOCK TWO
MA
R
K
E
T
P
L
A
C
E
D
R
I
V
E
LA
K
E
D
R
I
V
E
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT
20 FOOT DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT PER PLAT OF CAROLE'S
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
DRA
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EAS
E
M
E
N
T
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EAS
E
M
E
N
T
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
1 INCH IRON PIPE
2 INCH DISK
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SEE DETAIL
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
4
2
8
.
6
3
N89°26'22"W
0.72
38.
6
3
149
.
8
7
14
.
1
9
N2
1
°
2
3
'
4
6
"
E
3
1
9
.
2
2
85
.
8
8
NORTHEAST LINE OF LOT 13, BLOCK 2,
CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets
SE CORNER OF THE
SE1/4-SW1/4 OF
SEC. 8, T.31, R. 22
CAST IRON MONUMENT
SOUTH LINE OF THE
SE1/4-SW1/4 OF
SEC. 8, T.31, R.22
(WEST 122.88)
(XX)
LOT 2
SOUTH LINE OF LOT 12,
BLOCK 2, CAROLE'S
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
WEST LINE OF ANOKA
COUNTY HIGHWAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT
NO. 17
NORTH LINE OF LOT 3,
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 134
NORTHERLY EXTENSION
OF THE WEST LINE OF
LOT 3, AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION NO. 134
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE
WEST LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2,
CAROLE'S ESTATES 2ND
ADDITION
NORTH LINE OF THE
SW1/4-SE1/4 OF
SEC. 8, T.31, R.22
WEST LINE OF ANOKA
COUNTY HIGHWAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 17
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
5
N
(N
2
0
°
3
8
'
E
)
(1
3
1
2
.
3
)
(1
2
4
1
.
3
)
(7
1
)
(1
0
5
.
9
)
(369.4)
20
20
WE
S
T
E
R
L
Y
L
I
N
E
O
F
TR
U
N
K
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
N
O
.
8
60
33
33
33
33
50
30
(10
8
.
6
)
(14
6
.
3
)
PO
I
N
T
B
E
I
N
G
1
3
2
0
F
E
E
T
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
L
Y
AS
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
A
L
O
N
G
T
H
E
WE
S
T
E
R
L
Y
L
I
N
E
O
F
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
F
R
O
M
IT
S
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
LIN
E
O
F
T
H
E
S
W
1
/
4
-
S
E
1
/
4
O
F
SE
C
.
8
,
T
.
3
1
,
R
.
2
2
1 INCH = 40 FEET
5
10
10
10
10
10
30
30
SOUTH QUARTER
CORNER OF
SEC. 8, T.31, R. 22
CAST IRON MONUMENT XX
X X
X
N89°14'14"W 2515.89
(C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
2
3
)
13
5
11
0
CO
CO
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE
OHE
OH
E
OHE
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE
OHE
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OHE
OH
E
OHE
OHE
OH
E
OHE
OHE
OH
E
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OH
E
OHE
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OH
E
OHE
OHE
OHE
OH
E
N89°26'22"W
0.72
N6
4
°
4
5
'
4
2
"
W
1
8
1
.
2
8
R
=
210.00
Δ
=17°52'59"
L
=65.54
S71°53'2
6
"
W
23.85
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
2
9
5
.
2
3
S2
1
°
2
3
'
4
6
"
W
14
.
1
9
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
4
2
8
.
6
3
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
2
9
0
.
3
6
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
8
0
.
6
6
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
8
9
.
2
7
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
2
6
4
.
7
1
S24
°
5
2
'
0
4
"
W
9
4
.
9
2
N31
°
5
2
'
3
3
"
E
22.
4
5
S25
°
3
6
'
3
2
"
W
1
4
1
.
0
1
148.
9
0
20.0
2
S5
8
°
0
7
'
2
7
"
E
4
9
.
6
4
29.
6
0
20.
0
4
S
1
5
°
2
6
'
5
7
"
E
8
1
.
5
3
224
.
4
6
104
.
1
7
S5
9
°
2
0
'
2
6
"
E
6
5
.
2
4
S64
°
5
2
'
2
2
"
E
1
6
8
.
9
2
N
4
6
°
5
2
'
4
3
"
W
4
3
.
0
6
C H BRG=S29°42'14"W
C H=414.31
R=5761.85
Δ=4°07'15"
L=414.40
100
.
0
0
Δ=0°53'33"
L=89.75
Δ=0°59'44"
L=100.12
Δ=2°13'58"
L=224.53
0 40'80'JAVA LINO LAKES 2ND ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 1 and 2, Block One, JAVA LINO LAKES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
LAND SURVEYOR
DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING
JONATHAN D. SCHUETTE, LS
MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 45352
TELEPHONE: (320) 762-1290
ENGINEER:
DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING
MICHAEL J. GERBER, PE
MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 56653
TELEPHONE: (320) 762-1290
LOT AREAS:
LOT 1, BLOCK ONE
65,550 SQ. FT+/- OR 1.50 ACRES +/-
LOT 2, BLOCK ONE
29,751 SQ. FT+/- OR 0.68 ACRES +/-
LOT 3, BLOCK ONE
36,474 SQ. FT+/- OR 0.84 ACRES +/-
OWNERS:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
AND
JAVA LINO RETAIL 2.0 LLC
= DENOTES COUNTY MONUMENT
= DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT
= DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18
INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT
SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352
PRELIMINARY
PLAT
1 of 1
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS
THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC.
USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE
ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF
DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF
THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC.
VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED
STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO
LEGAL PROSECUTION.
COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO.:
NO.DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE:LICENSE #:
PRINTED NAME:
F:
\
D
E
S
I
G
N
T
R
E
E
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
1
0
9
-
J
A
V
A
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
\
1
0
9
2
3
0
0
8
-
L
I
N
O
L
A
K
E
S
2
.
0
\
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
S
\
S
U
R
V
E
Y
\
V
-
P
P
-
1
0
9
2
3
0
0
8
.
D
W
G
#
#
#
#
3
/
3
1
/
2
0
2
5
PREPARED FOR:
10923008
JAVA COMPANIES
LINO LAKES, MN
CWK
JDS
45352
Jonathan D. Schuette
03/28/25
Surveyor's Note:
1. The underground utilities shown hereon have been located from field survey information and existing record drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantees
that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the
underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated, although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information
available. The contractor is responsible to ensure that any existing utilities (shown or not shown) are not damaged during construction. The surveyor has
physically located the underground utilities per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 240100013, 240100015, 240100016 and 240100017.
2. Subject property has 218,508 square feet (5.01 acres) more or less.
3. The survey does not constitute a title search by Design Tree Engineering and Land Surveying to determine ownership or easements of record. For all
information regarding easements, right of way and title of record, Design Tree Engineering and Land Surveying relied upon Title Commitments Numbers
XX/XX/XX prepared by Servion Commercial Title with a preparation date of XX/XX/XX.
4. Field survey was completed by Design Tree on 12/21/2023.
1 INCH = 40 FEET
DEVELOPER:
MARK KROGH
879 SCHEFFER AVE.
ST. PAUL, MN 55102
JAVA COMPANIES, LLC
ZONING: GB
RIM:908.39
INV:889.28
RIM:910.86
INV W:886.83
INV NE:886.83
INV SE:886.78
INV:905.85
RIM:911.08
INV N:906.12
INV SW:906.15
15
"
R
C
P
15"
R
C
P
40'
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
E
R
DO
C
.
N
O
.
2
1
7
2
9
1
6
.
0
0
2
OHE OHE
UGT UGT
FO FO
UGE UGE
GAS GAS
l l
X X
LEGEND
HYDRANT
SANITARY MANHOLE
STORM MANHOLE
GATE VALVE
POWER POLE
LIGHT POLE
CATCH BASIN
SIGN
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
SHRUB
COMMUNICATION PEDESTAL
GUY WIRE
BOLLARD
POWER BOX
ELECTRIC METER
WELL
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
WOOD FENCE
CHAINLINK FENCE
WIRE FENCE
STORM SEWER LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
WATERMAIN
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND FIBER
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
AGGREGATE SURFACING
LANDSCAPING
BUILDING
PLATTED & EXISTING LOT LINES
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT LINES
CENTERLINE
BOUNDARY LINE
EDGE OF TREE LINE OR WOODS
EDGE OF WETLAND
APRON
GAS METER
HAND HOLE
CO
W
WATER CURB STOP
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
FLAG POLE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN
20 FOOT DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT PER PLAT OF CAROLE'S
ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
LOT 1
BLOCK ONE
LOT 2
LA
K
E
D
R
I
V
E
ZONING: GB
ZONING: GB
ZONING: GB
LAND USE: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
ZONING: NB
ZONING: R1
LAND USE: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING: R1
LAND USE: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING: PUD
LAND USE: PLANNED COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL
ZONING: R4
LAND USE: PLANNED COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL
NOTE: The proposed land use is consistent
with the future land use designation identified
in the 2040 comprehensive plan.
DRAINAGE & UTILITY
EASEMENT PER JAVA
LINO LAKES
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EAS
E
M
E
N
T
P
E
R
J
A
V
A
LIN
O
L
A
K
E
S
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
EAS
E
M
E
N
T
P
E
R
J
A
V
A
LIN
O
L
A
K
E
S
20.
0
LOT 3
Attachment 2. Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminay Plat
17
8
E
9
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
|
SU
I
T
E
2
0
0
| SA
I
N
T
P
A
U
L
,
M
N
|
55
1
0
1
|
65
1
.
2
8
6
.
8
4
5
0
|
WS
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: May 7, 2025 Re: Java Properties – Lino Lakes Retail 2.0 – 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Review 028824-000
WSB reviewed the site plans for the Lino Lakes Retail 2.0 site 2nd Addition by Java Properties in Lino Lakes, MN, received April 14, 2025. The site is located at 77th Street west of Lake Drive (CSAH 23). The lot has frontage along Lake Drive (CSAH 23). Comments were made on the following documents:
• Lino Lakes 2.0 2nd Addition Civil Plans prepared by Design Tree, dated March 28, 2025, received April 15, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the planset that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo. There were not separate site, utility, or grading plans for Chipotle, Pacific Dental or O’Reilly’s (only architectural building drawings) so they utilize the same overall drawings and may have overlapping comments. Design Tree Engineering (DTE) (3/11/2025) responses in red. WSB (4/2/2025) responses and new comments in blue. (1st Addition) Design Tree Engineering (DTE) (4/15/2025) responses in green. WSB (5/7/2025) responses and new comments in purple. (2nd Addition) Engineering
• General
The Lino Lakes Retail 2.0 2nd Addition project proposes to construct three (3) commercial
lots from the existing two (2) commercial lots of Lino Lakes Retail 2.0 1st Addition Block One.
This includes the similar associated parking lot, utilities, landscaping, and stormwater
management features as the Lino Lakes Retail 2.0 1st Addition specifically for Block One.
Comments: 1. Revise all plan sheets with updated City plans for the 2025 Market Place Drive Realignment Project a. Update items that will be constructed and removed as part of the project
(DTE 3/11/2025) See revised plans (WSB 4/2/2025) See comments and as-bid plans (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 2
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
b. Coordinate the location and elevation of specific items such as utility services to be able to best serve the proposed sites within the scope of the City project.
(DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, see revised plans (WSB 4/2/2025) See comments and as-bid plans (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 2. Developer/ Contractor shall coordinate relocation of existing utilities with private utility companies and City
a. Relocation scheduling is per private utility companies (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, this is being coordinated with City/utility companies (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete with construction (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition b. Developer/contractor responsible for coordinating site construction
scheduling with private utility companies’ scheduling (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete with construction (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Grading
A grading and drainage plan was provided for the site including paved areas, curb, and retaining walls.
Comments: 1. Watershed district approval for the City project is still pending. Additional stormwater
features may be required as a result of the final review. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, will coordinate with City for final stormwater design.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Watershed permitting for the City project is approved, no further design changes are anticipated for that element of design.
2. Call out all EOFs from site stormwater basins, existing and proposed.
(DTE 3/11/2025) EOF locations have been called out on the plans. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
3. Tip-in curb and gutter on islands of the parking lot for Building B will result in ponded
water, specify tip-out. (DTE 3/11/2025) Locations of tipped-out curb have been added to the plans.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
4. Shift the sidewalk on the west side of the driveway south towards the roadway in order to eliminate the retaining wall in the City basin.
(DTE 3/11/2025) Sidewalk location has been revised per the comment and the revised plans provided by the City.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
5. Retaining walls will require permitting through the City separate from the building
permit. (DTE 3/11/2025) Retaining walls have been eliminated
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 3
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
6. Provide Emergency Overflow (EOF) elevations for all low points in the parking or
green space areas. (DTE 3/11/2025) EOF locations have been called out on the plans
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
7. (WSB 4/2/2025) Check with Anoka County to see whether connecting to the existing storm sewer on Lake Drive without crossing Market Place Drive is possible from infiltration basin IB-1 (assumed INV 906.09) (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
8. (WSB 4/2/2025) The spot elevations of the proposed entrances behind the curbline differ from the spot elevations on the City plans. Coordinate what elevations will be necessary beyond the sidewalk and apron. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Stormwater Management
Stormwater management for the Lino Retail 2.0 site consists of infiltration basins for the southern and northern lots. Additionally, some stormwater infrastructure is proposed for the City realignment of Marketplace Drive. Existing and proposed discharge rates are
summarized below.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt
Existing 2.37 5.53 14.27 Needed if basins landlocked
Currently
Proposed 1.65 4.77 10.86 Needed if basins
landlocked
Comments: 1. An approximate City storm sewer alignment is marked up on the plans showing the
pipe intended to provide an outflow for the site rather than emergency overflows. The northern infiltration basin shall outlet into the pipe.
(DTE 3/11/2025) The plans have been revised with the updated City storm sewer design
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
2. Remove the City infiltration basin between the roadway and parking lot, the basin west of the driveway access will provide sufficient storage for runoff.
(DTE 3/11/2025) This basin has been removed (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
3. Provide an equalization pipe or channel between the existing City stormwater basin
and proposed infiltration basin at the 100-yr HWL (906.3). (DTE 3/11/2025) The plans have been revised to eliminate interaction between the
City and Development’s stormwater infrastructure.
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 4
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 4. Pipe storage for infiltration is not allowed for water quality volume or rate control.
Nonperforated pipes must be used for storm sewer conveyance. (DTE 3/11/2025) The perforated pipes were initially considered to meet the Department of Labor and Industries requirement to not surcharge storm sewer. The storm sewer has been revised to eliminate this conflict and has been revised to be nonperforated. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
5. An outlet control structure will be needed for the southern infiltration basin based on proposed RCWD rule changes due to go into effect by the end of 2024. a. At the very least, permanent stabilization is needed along the overflow path to reduce the likelihood of large-scale erosion in major storm events.
(DTE 3/11/2025) Outlet control structures have been added to both infiltration basins and a storm sewer connection has been added to the south basin (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 6. Soil borings indicate significant amounts of SM soils, meaning design infiltration rates should be 0.45 in/hr consistent with RCWD and MPCA standards.
(DTE 3/11/2025) The design infiltration rate has been revised to be 0.45 in/hr. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 7. In-situ infiltration rate testing will be needed during or after construction to confirm designed rates are achievable. a. Testing before construction can be used to demonstrate infiltration rates
above the 0.45 in/hr standard. (DTE 3/11/2025) The design infiltration rate has been revised to be 0.45 in/hr (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 8. Both infiltration basins must be able to demonstrate they meet 48-hour drawdown requirements.
(DTE 3/11/2025) Outlets have been added to both basins to provide maximum depth below outlet of 1.8’ which correlates to a 48-hour drawdown time (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 9. The lowest-floor elevation of all buildings must be specified to ensure compliance with infiltration basin freeboard requirements (basin bottom must be at or below
lowest-floor elevation). a. This is especially relevant for the potential oil change pit in the Valvoline building. (DTE 3/11/2025) The FFE of each building has been added to the plans. The basement elevation of the Valvoline building has also been added to the plans. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 10. Show roof drain routing. Tie into storm sewer at or upstream of a sumped structure to provide pretreatment of roof runoff. (DTE 3/11/2025) The locations of the roof drains will be finalized once tenants have been finalized. (WSB 4/2/2025) Noted, though the locations must still comply with the original comment.
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 5
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
(WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
11. The Marketplace Drive roadway and existing stormwater basin, including offsite tributary drainage, must be included in the HydroCAD model to understand all flows throughout the site. (DTE 3/11/2025) The Marketplace Drive roadway and existing stormwater basin have not been included in the HydroCAD model as there is no interaction between the City and Development’s stormwater infrastructure.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 12. HydroCAD runoff should be set to “Calculate separate pervious/impervious runoff (SBUH weighting)” for most accurate runoff results. (DTE 3/11/2025) The HydroCAD model has been updated per the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
13. Proposed impervious should be entered as paved parking and roof as there is a mix of both. (DTE 3/11/2025) The HydroCAD model has been updated per the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
14. Existing and proposed models should route to a Link node to calculate total offsite flows. (DTE 3/11/2025) The HydroCAD model has been updated to include one discharge node for both existing and proposed conditions (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
15. Confirm drainage area delineations match site grading, some areas on the perimeter of the sites do not appear possible to route to proposed stormwater basins as indicated in HydroCAD. (DTE 3/11/2025) The drainage areas have been updated per the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) The existing modeled drainage area of 4.551 acres exceeds the proposed modeled drainage area of 4.071 acres. These areas must match for proper
confirmation of rate control. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 16. For modeling of outflow rates and HWLs, exfiltration is not allowed in HydroCAD to conservatively design assuming basin infiltration capacity is lost in the future.
(DTE 3/11/2025) Infiltration has been removed from the HydroCAD model per the comment (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 17. (WSB 4/2/2025) It is recommended to consolidate the parking space curb cuts going into IB-1. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 18. (WSB 4/2/2025) The IB-1 storage curve in the HydroCAD modeling is incorrect for the 906 contour. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 6
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
19. (WSB 4/2/2025) Some kind of trash screening is needed on the IB-1 outlet opening to reduce the potential for clogging of the 5” orifice. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
20. (WSB 4/2/2025) The EOF for IB-2 must include riprap stabilization. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 21. (WSB 4/2/2025) Provide the vertical separation of the storm sewer crossing the watermain in Marketplace Dr.
a. Maintain minimum 18” separation with watermain b. Insulation is needed for when vertical separation is less than 36” with watermain (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Water Supply
Existing and proposed water services are provided for the 3 commercial lots through
existing and proposed City infrastructure on Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and the future Market
Place Drive.
Comments: 1. Coordinate with the City 2025 Market Place Drive Realignment Project for providing the appropriately sized stubs at the appropriate locations (DTE 3/11/2025) The latest design file provided by the City has been included in the plans. (WSB 4/2/2025) See comments and as-bid plans (WSB 5/7/2025) City to provide two sets of utility stubs (6” PVC C900 water and 4” PVC sanitary sewer with gate valves roughly at the easement line) 2. Verify that the proposed 6” water stubs are sufficient for the building’s combined domestic and fire suppression needs. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 3. We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the proposed plan for water supply and hydrant coverage. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted (WSB 4/2/2025) Current version to be reviewed (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 4. Show removing all watermain up to the gate valve and the hydrant assembly along the current 77th Street (DTE 3/11/2025) The plans have been revised to include removal of the watermain and hydrant by the City as that is shown in the Marketplace Dr plans. (WSB 4/2/2025) City will remove the hydrant assembly but the watermain shall be removed up to but NOT including the existing gate valve. Plug gate valve for redundancy (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 5. Building A will utilize the existing 6” water service stub instead of installing a new service tee on the main a. Lower water service and insulate below the existing basin
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 7
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
(DTE 3/11/2025) The utility plan has been revised per the comment (WSB 4/2/2025) Show existing service (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
6. Remove/abandon/seal all existing wells per Minnesota Department of Health requirements. (DTE 3/11/2025) Notes have been added to the Removal Plans stating the information from the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
7. (WSB 4/2/2025) Provide 6” gate valve when connecting to the western water service south of Marketplace Drive a. Provide temporary hydrant or air release bleed pipe on southern end 8. (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Sanitary Sewer
Existing and proposed sanitary sewer services are provided for the 3 commercial lots through existing and proposed City infrastructure on Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and the future Market Place Drive.
Comments: 1. Coordinate with the City 2025 Market Place Drive Realignment Project for providing the appropriately sized stubs at the appropriate locations (DTE 3/11/2025) The latest design file provided by the City has been included in the plans. (WSB 4/2/2025) See comments and as-bid plans (WSB 5/7/2025) City to provide two sets of utility stubs (6” PVC C900 water and 4” PVC sanitary sewer with gate valves roughly at the easement line) 2. Building A will utilize the existing 6” sanitary sewer service stub instead of installing a new service wye a. Cut back on the existing riser as necessary to lower the sanitary sewer service and maintain minimum cover below the existing basin
(DTE 3/11/2025) The utility plan has been revised per the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Show existing service (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 3. Remove/abandon all existing septic systems per Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and County requirements. (DTE 3/11/2025) Notes have been added to the Removal Plans stating the information provided in the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete
• Transportation
In the 2025 construction season the City will realign 77th St to the Market Place Dr / CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) signalized intersection. When the Market Place Dr signal was installed the median at 77th St was also installed. The intent was that 77th would realign
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 8
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
in the future to provide that access again at Market Place Dr. This has been a long
standing plan of the City in coordination with Anoka County. Anoka County completed an
corridor study of Lake Drive in 2020, from Hodgson Rd to Pine St. This study evaluated access and mobility. As improvements are completed on Lake Dr in the future the mobility will improve throughout the corridor. This study can be found on Anoka County’s website. The Lino Retail 2.0 project site proposes one access to the north and one access to the south of the realigned Market Place Drive. There will be stubs to the north and south to
extend the drive aisles further in the future. Reference the easement section here within
and planner’s report for access easement information.
As required by Ordinance the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study. The proposed
development is expected to generate approximately 214 AM peak hour, 212 PM peak
hour, and 2,680 daily trips. 95% of the daily trips will go directly from the site to Market Place Dr and eastbound to Lake Dr. Traffic from the proposed development on adjacent local roadways is considered minimal. Marilyn Dr existing volumes are 170 daily trips and with the Market Place realignment 270 trips per day are estimated, with the proposed
development 370 daily trips. 77th St existing volumes are 175 daily trips and with the
Market Place realignment 250 trips per day are estimated, with the proposed
development 280 daily trips. These volumes are well under capacity for the local roadways. The study also analyzed capacity of the following intersections:
• CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) & Market Place Dr
• CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) & 77th St W
• 77th St W & Marilyn Dr To evaluate the intersection of CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) & Market Place Dr the intersection of CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) & 79th St was included in the study. The build condition capacity
analysis has an overall LOS A during AM and PM peak hours thus meeting ordinance.
There are no delay or queuing issues identified.
Sidewalk will be installed by the City along Market Place Dr from Lake Dr to 77th St/
Marilyn Dr. There is also sidewalk along Lake Dr in the development area. There are pedestrian crossings at the intersection of CSAH 23 (Lake Dr) & Market Place Dr. The City has a future tail planned along Lake Dr from Apollo Drive to Main Street. Comments: 1. The proposed site access’ north and south should be stop conditions. (DTE 3/11/2025) Stop signs have been added to the entrances per the comment. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 2. We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the proposed plan for emergency access. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted (WSB 4/2/2025) Current version to be reviewed (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 9
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
3. Provide turning movements for all proposed emergency, garbage, and delivery/semi-truck vehicles. (DTE 3/11/2025) Turning exhibits have been provided as a separate submittal.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Current version to be reviewed (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
There are no delineated wetlands shown on the existing survey for the site.
• Landscaping
Landscaping plans were provided as part of the submittal. The City’s Environmental
Coordinator to review landscaping and provide in-depth comments.
• Floodplain
No floodplain impacts are proposed on site.
• Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements are required for utilities outside the road right of way and stormwater systems. Comments: 1. All stormwater facilities will need to be contained in D&U easements up to the 100-yr HWL. 2. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, these easements will be included in the final plat submittal 3. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 4. D&U easement is needed over the proposed City storm sewer running to the north end of the site. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, these easements will be included in the final plat submittal (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete 5. Dedicate additional 20' drainage and utility easement for existing sanitary sewer (20'+ deep) along the west side of Lake Drive/CSAH 23. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, these easements will be included in the final plat submittal. (WSB 4/2/2025)– Submit with Final Plat (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 6. Provide an access easement over the rear drive lane from the Market Place Drive Right of Way to the development line (adjacent with the Legion property) (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, these easements will be included in the final plat submittal (WSB 4/2/2025) – Submit with Final Plat (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 7. (WSB 4/2/2025) For Lot 1 Block 2
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 10
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
a. Provide minimum standard 5’ easement to the south side b. Reduce to standard 10’ easement adjacent to County Road 23/Lake Drive c. Provide minimum standard 10’ easement adjacent to Market Place Drive
(WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition 8. (WSB 4/2/2025) For Lot 2 Block 1 a. Provide additional 10’ (20’ to 30’) adjacent to County Road 23/Lake Drive (WSB 5/7/2025) Complete
9. (WSB 4/2/2025) For Block 1 a. Change additional rear 65’ drainage and utility easement to additional 45’ access easement (should not overlap existing easements) adjacent to existing 20’ rear drainage and utility easement (WSB 5/7/2025) Comments remain from Lino Lakes 2.0 1st Addition
• Development Agreement
A Development Agreement will be required.
• Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
Private stormwater facilities will be maintained through a Declaration for Maintenance of
Stormwater Facilities. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration. City Engineer to provide template.
• Permits Required
1. NPDES General Construction Permit
(DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, the contractor shall obtain the permit prior to construction. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete – To be addressed prior to construction
2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for construction
(DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, in progress (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete – To be addressed prior to construction
3. Rice Creek Watershed Permit
(DTE 3/11/2025) A RCWD permit shall be applied concurrently with the city submittal.
(WSB 4/2/2025) Complete – To be addressed prior to construction
4. Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit if grading work extends into their right of way. (DTE 3/11/2025) Noted, the contractor shall obtain the permit prior to construction. (WSB 4/2/2025) Complete – To be addressed prior to construction
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 11
Java Properties - Lino Retail 2.0 Engineering Review
If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner
From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
Date: April 30, 2025
Re: Environmental Comments – Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat
The Environmental board reviewed the proposed plans at their April 30th, 2025 meeting and
recommended the following comments:
1. Remove plantings from IB-2 basins EOF route, planting should not encroach
on maintenance access
2. The northern most American Larch planted on sheet L102 should be moved
away from the pipe and flare of the storm sewer outlet.
3. A six (6) foot high maintenance free privacy fence shall be located along the west
lot lines of all three (3) lots.
a. Detail shows Cedar fencing, update for maintenance free.
4. Screening of 30” is required adjacent from the drive through lane on block 1 lot 3
along Lake Drive. Provide screening along the backside of the drive through to
screen headlights from shining into Lake Dr.
5. Provide additional plantings/screening along Lake Drive to enhance the site and
reduce hard cover and turf.
6. Connect Proposed side walk from Market Place Drive into the development at
block 1 lot 3 to provide pedestrian facilities into the site.
a. Currently sidewalk would lead pedestrians to the private entrance, and
they would need to walk along the road and through the parking lot.
Environmental Memo
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 25-77
RESOLUTION APPROVING JAVA LINO LAKES 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition
preliminary plat (“Development”); and
WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the Development based on the following
submittals:
• Certificate of Survey prepared by Design Tree dated September 9, 2024
• Preliminary Plat prepared by Design Tree dated March 28, 2025
• Lino Lakes 2.0 2nd Addition Plan Set prepared by Design Tree dated March 28, 2025
• Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec dated October
7, 2024; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on May 14,
2025 and the Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat with a 7-0 vote.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
(1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to
the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
1. Land use plan;
2. Transportation plan;
3. Utility (sewer and water) plans;
4. Local water management plan;
5. Capital improvement plan; and
6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan.
2
(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill
policies:
1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan;
2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the
following:
a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision;
b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the
developer;
c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with
available city trunk funds; and
d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's
capital improvement plan.
3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the
normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and
4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future
operation and maintenance.
Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat is consistent with infill policies. The development is
within the current Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025). The cost and timing of the expenditure
of city funds are consistent with the city’s capital improvement plan. The cost, operation and
maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water
and sanitary rate study. No future utility costs are proposed.
(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the
following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity
Manual:
1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic
generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one
grade;
2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a
proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C;
3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a
proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D;
4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access
to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must
provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of
service D or better;
5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the
structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or
the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies;
6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street
improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan.
3
However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to
correct any street deficiencies;
7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake
Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be
evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to
resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision
project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the
improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project
contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that
contribute to traffic at the interchange; and
8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat meets the requirements for level of service (LOS).
The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the
development is not considered premature. Existing roads and intersections providing access to
the subdivision have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the
proposed subdivision. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s
capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
(d) Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water
supply when:
1. The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the
subdivision;
2. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the
opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision;
3. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use
and fire protection; and
4. The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided
with a potable water supply.
Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat will have an adequate water supply.
(e) Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste
disposal systems when:
1. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with
the MUSA allocation criteria;
2. The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to
its maximum density;
3. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan
and capital improvement plan;
4. A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate
sanitary sewer disposal system; and
4
5. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an
effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing.
Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat will be served with an adequate waste disposal
system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat is not a
premature subdivision; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Java Lino Lakes 2nd Addition preliminary plat is approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. A shared access, parking, and maintenance agreement and exhibit shall be recorded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following items shall be addressed at the time of final
plat land use application submittal:
1. All comments from the City Engineer memo dated May 7, 2025.
2. All comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated May 5, 2025.
3. Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along
the lot lines.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________,
2025.
___________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 5
STAFF ORGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
DATE OF WORK SESSION: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
At the Work Session, staff will present the June 9, 2025 Council staff report.
The applicant, Capital Real Estate, Inc., submitted a land use application for Clearwater
Commons preliminary plat and vacation. The preliminary plat is for three (3) commercial lots
north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of I-35E, east of 21st Avenue North and south of the park
and ride. A stand along Chipotle Restaurant is proposed on Lot 1.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
None. Discussion only.
ATTACHMENTS
1. June 9, 2025 Council Staff Report
1
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 7D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
MEETING DATE: June 9, 2025
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 25-78 Approving Clearwater Commons
Preliminary Plat
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
______________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Capital Real Estate, Inc., submitted a land use application for Clearwater
Commons preliminary plat and vacation. The preliminary plat is for three (3) commercial lots
north of CSAH 14 (Main Street), west of I-35E, east of 21st Avenue North and south of the park
and ride. A stand along Chipotle Restaurant is proposed on Lot 1.
Tentative Review Schedule:
Complete Application Date: April 8, 2025
60-Day Deadline: June 7, 2025
Environmental Board Meeting: April 30, 2025
Park Board Meeting: N/A
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: May 14, 2025
City Council Work Session: June 2, 2025
City Council Meeting: June 9, 2025
BACKGROUND
The Land Use Application is for the following:
• Preliminary Plat (Clearwater Commons)
o 3 commercial lots
• Vacation-Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement
This staff report is based on the following information:
2
• Certificate of Survey prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated January 10,
2025
• Resource Inventory prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated January 10,
2025
• Preliminary Plat prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated February 24,
2025
• Civil Plan Set prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated March 7, 2025
• Stormwater Management Report prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated
March 7, 2025
• Project Narrative dated March 3, 2025
• Easement Exhibits prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated February 24,
2025
• Traffic Study prepared by SSTS LLC dated April 2, 2025
ANALYSIS
Existing Site Conditions
The 14 acre site is one existing lot legally described as Outlot A, Alino Addition. Per the
December 19, 2024 Preliminary Report of Geotechnical Exploration prepared by American
Engineering Testing, the site is an existing agricultural property with fairly flat terrain towards
the center and higher banks on the northwest and southeast corners. Elevations at the soil
borings ranged from 911 feet to 904 feet. Wetlands exist on site.
Zoning and Land Use
The site is zoned GB, General Business and is guided commercial per the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan. A restaurant is a permitted use.
Current Zoning GB, General Business
Existing Land Use Vacant Commercial
Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Commercial
Utility Staging Area 1A=2018-2025
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use
North PUD, Planned Unit
Development
Residential
(Watermark)
Low Density Mixed
Residential
South GB, General Business Commercial Commercial
3
East GB, General Business Vacant Commercial Commercial
West City of Centerville City of Centerville City of Centerville
Subdivision Ordinance
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
The preliminary plat is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial development
and zoning code requirements for GB, General Business lot size and lot width.
Lot Size Lot Width
GB Requirements 20,000 sf 100 ft
Lot 1 44,006 sf 197.77 ft
Lot 2 27,588 sf 117.22 ft
Lot 3 27,820 sf 120.08 ft
Blocks and Lots
The proposed preliminary plat contains the following areas:
Parcel Acres Purpose
Lot 1, Block 1 1.01 acres Chipotle Restaurant
Lot 2, Block 1 0.63 acres Future Retail
Lot 3, Block 1 0.64 acres Future Auto Service
Outlot A 11.88 acres Future development
TOTAL 14.16 acres
All additional road right-of-way along 21st Avenue North was dedicated on the Alino Addition
final plat.
Sheet C1, Total Site Plan shows potential future development of the site. This is not a final plan.
Future development of the outlots will require preliminary plat and final plat.
Streets and Alleys
CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an A-Minor Arterial Connector county road. No additional access
points or driveways are allowed along this section of Main Street.
4
21st Avenue North is a minor collector City road.
Per Document #2075334.005, Declaration of Access Control, full access to the 14 acre site exists
600 feet north of Main Street from a private driveway, just south of the park and ride. The
proposed access 300ft north of Main Street will be restricted to right in/right out.
There are no public streets being constructed within the development. The internal system will
be private driveways.
A shared driveway and maintenance agreement will be required for all private driveways and
joint off-street parking areas.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along the lot
lines.
Public Land Dedication
The City will collect cash fee in lieu of land dedication for commercial development at the time
of final plat.
Clearwater Commons
2.28 acres x $2,600 per acre = $5,928
Site and Building Plan Review
A separate land use application for Site and Building Plan Review for the proposed Chipotle
Restaurant has been submitted. A restaurant is a permitted use in the GB, General Business
district; therefore, site and building plans will be reviewed administratively by staff.
Grading Plan and Stormwater Management
Per the City Engineer Memo-Chipotle (Clearwater Commons) dated May 7, 2025:
Stormwater management for the Chipotle site consists of constructing an underground BMP on
the east side of the site and leveraging an existing stormwater basin in the southwest corner of
the site.
Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs)
Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt
5
Existing 9.37 14.37 21.04 Not required
Proposed 8.23 10.24 20.89 Not required
Additional comments/revisions are noted in the attached City Engineer memo.
Public Utilities
The site will be municipally served by an 8” sanitary sewer main and 8” watermain along 21st
Avenue North.
Tree Preservation, Mitigation Standards and Landscaping
Per the April 30, 2025 Environmental Board staff report, a resource inventory was completed
for the project showing 10 trees proposed for impacts. 9 of the trees are poplar and 1 willow
that would be considered significant trees. A survey of all significant trees onsite will be
required along with noting where the proposed removals are within the site. Determinations
should be made for the basic use area and any ESA’s within the site. Final tree mitigation will be
completed with each specific site.
Canopy cover, foundation landscaping, and screening requirements will be reviewed separately
for each commercial development.
Signage
A separate Sign Permit Application with detailed sign information is required for any permanent
or temporary signage.
Impervious Surface Coverage
Impervious surface coverage will be reviewed during site and building plan review for each lot.
Traffic Study
A Traffic Study was prepared by SSTS, LLC dated April 2, 2025. The study analyzed the following
intersections:
• Main St (CSAH 14) & 21st Avenue North
• 21st Avenue North and Bank Driveway
• 21st Avenue North and Michaud Way
Trip Generation
6
The Proposed Project is estimated to generate the following new trips (not including pass-by
trips) on the roadway network:
•107 trips (58 entering and 49 exiting) during the morning traffic peak hour
•90 trips (45 entering and 45 exiting) during the evening traffic peak hour
•1,496 daily trips
Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions and driver delay (measured
in seconds) of an intersection. Operations are given letter designations from “A” (best
operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions).
City Code Section 1007.020, Site Plan Review and Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature
Subdivision establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states
that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS more than one
grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must
be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better.
2025 Existing LOS
(AM/PM)
2027 Build LOS
(AM/PM)
Main St (CSAH 14) &
21st Avenue North A/B B/B
21st Avenue North
and Bank Driveway A/A A/A
21st Avenue North
and Michaud Way A/A A/A
The proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the traffic
generated by the proposed development is within the capabilities of the City.
7
EQB Environmental Review
The site is within the 2005 I-35E Corridor AUAR environmental review boundary. The AUAR
was updated in May 2020. The AUAR identifies this site as commercial in the land use
scenarios. The proposed 3 lot commercial preliminary plat is consistent with commercial
development. No further environmental assessment is required.
Wetlands
The preliminary plat includes three (3) wetlands totaling 2.63 acres. These wetlands are not
within the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). There will be 28,356 sf of impacts to
Wetland 3. These impacts will be mitigated via purchase of wetland banking credits.
The applicant will work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act regulations.
Shoreland District
The preliminary plat is not located in the Shoreland District.
Floodplain
There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments
Anoka County Highway Department
Anoka County Highway Department comments are attached.
MN Department of Transportation
MNDOT comments are attached.
City of Centerville
City of Centerville comments are attached.
Public Safety Comments
The Lino Lakes Police and Fire Divisions reviewed the development and did not have any
comments.
Environmental Board
8
The Environmental Board reviewed the project at their April 30, 2025 meeting and made
recommendation with conditions as noted in the attached memo.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on May 14, 2025. There was one (1) public
comment regarding pedestrian access and sidewalks. The Board recommended approval with a
7-0 vote.
Agreements
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained, and a Declaration for Maintenance of
Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the
City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration
Development Agreement and Final Plat
The applicant shall submit a Land Use Application for final plat after preliminary plat approval. A
Development Agreement will then be prepared by the City as part of the final plat application.
Site Improvement Performance Agreement
Site Improvement Performance Agreements will be required for construction of the commercial
buildings.
Comprehensive Plan
The Clearwater Commons preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan regarding land use, housing, economic development, transportation, local
water management plan, sanitary sewer, water supply and parks, greenway and trails.
Land Use Plan
The Comprehensive Plan guides this property for commercial use. The preliminary plat is
consistent with commercial land use.
Housing Plan
The goals and policies of the Housing Plan are not negatively impacted by the three (3) lot
commercial preliminary plat.
9
Economic Development
The three (3) lot commercial preliminary plat supports the City’s economic development plan.
Transportation Plan
Goals of the Transportation Plan are to ensure that street and roads are as safe as possible and
to reduce unnecessary traffic. CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an A-Minor Arterial Connector county
road. 21st Avenue North is a minor collector City road.
The exiting road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the three (3) lot commercial
preliminary plat.
Local Water Management Plan
The purpose of the water management program is to protect, preserve, and use natural surface
and groundwater storage and retention systems and prevent erosion of soil into surface water
systems. The commercial development will construct stormwater management BMP’s such as
curb, gutter, and stormwater ponds.
Sanitary Sewer Plan
The goal of the sanitary sewer plan is to maintain the city’s residents and businesses with an
affordable and safe sanitary sewer system. The three (3) lot commercial preliminary plat will be
served by an affordable and safe sanitary sewer system.
Water Supply Plan
A goal of the water supply plan is to provide residents and businesses with affordable potable
water that is safe and of high quality for daily consumption and fire demand. The three (3) lot
commercial preliminary plat will be served with a safe and high quality water supply.
Parks, Greenways and Trails
A goal and policy of the parks, greenways and trails plan is to continue to development and
fund recreational activities in the City. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication for
the three (3) new commercial lots.
Findings of Fact
The findings of fact are detailed in the attached resolution.
Vacation- Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement
10
A Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement per Doc. No. 2084186.005 exists in the southwest
corner of the site. A portion of the easement will be vacated to accommodate development.
The City Council will hold the public hearing which is tentatively scheduled for June 9, 2025.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the Clearwater Commons
preliminary plat.
ATTACHMENTS
1.Site Location & Aerial Map
2.Applicant Narrative
3.Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat
4.Total Site Plan
5.City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025
6.Environmental Coordinator Memo dated May 5, 2025
7.Anoka County Highway Department Letter dated April 30, 2025
8.City of Centerville Letter dated May 6, 2025
9.MnDOT Letter dated May 14, 2025
10.Resolution No. 25-78 Approving Preliminary Plat
Private Dr
WillowCir
Balsam
W
a
y
Pr iva t e Dr
W il lo w
C
i r
Ada
D
r
Cass
D
r
Do
r
a
Dr2
1
s
t
A
v
e
N
21
s
t
A
v
e
N
21
s
t
A
v
e
S
Mi c ha ud Way
14
Legend
Address Labels
Parcels
May 7, 2025m
Map Powered By Datafi
1 in = 300 Ft
Site Location & Aerial Map-Clearwater CommonsAttachment 1 Site LocationAerial Map
Land Use Application
Clearwater Commons
Applicant: Capital Real Estate Inc.
Date Submitted: March 3, 2025
1
Project Narrative
Capital Real Estate Inc. is pleased to submit plans for a new commercial retail
development at the northeast corner of Main Street and 21st Avenue North. We are proposing to
subdivide the existing Outlot A, Alino Addition to create a 2.28 acre development abutting Main
Street, further subdivided into three parcels. The proposed occupants of the lots include
Chipotle, Valvoline and a third, to-be-determined use.
With this application, we are applying for the following entitlements:
•Preliminary Plat (5 to 40 acres);
•Vacation of existing Utility and Drainage easements (to be replaced with a
reconfigured easement area);
•[Final plat to follow by separate application].
The intent of the Project is to provide and construct a commercial development with
associated infrastructure that includes grading for a drive aisle connection to 21st Avenue north to
serve three (3) retail buildings and associated site improvements, including parking lot areas,
stormwater improvements and landscaping (the “Project”). At the same time, the applicant is
proposing to construct an interior private drive to connect the Project to the existing drive aisle to
the north, which runs along the south boundary of the existing park-n-ride facility and out to 21st
Avenue North. Construction is expected to begin in Summer 2025 following watershed district
approvals, preliminary and final plat approval and Site Plan Approval from the City of Lino
Lakes.
Per the checklist for Preliminary Plat requirements:
Item 104. This application should not be deemed a premature subdivision pursuant to
section 1001.013. The proposed development is (a) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, (b)
consistent with infill policies, (c) roads or highways are available to serve the subdivision
[applicable findings of traffic report forthcoming], (d) water supply is adequate and (e) waste
disposal system is adequate.
Item 110. No conservation easements or establishment of homeowners association are
proposed. Buyer and Seller are currently negotiating exclusive use covenants for the benefit of
the proposed restaurants and retailers provided but no document is currently available. This will
be a private document, recorded by separate instrument at same time as plat filing. A final
version can be made available for city review as a part of the Final plat application. No common
open spaces are proposed.
Item 111. A proposed private variable width access and utility easement is shown on the
Preliminary Plat covering the east / west drive aisle that straddles the northerly property line of
Attachment 2. Applicant Narrative
Land Use Application
Clearwater Commons
Applicant: Capital Real Estate Inc.
Date Submitted: March 3, 2025
2
the proposed development and the southerly boundary of the remaining property to the north. A
Reciprocal Easement Agreement will be entered into between Buyer and Seller appointing one
party the maintaining owner of any common improvements within the easement area.
A proposed private 50’ access and utility easement is shown on the preliminary Plat covering the
north/south drive aisle connecting the proposed development to the existing private drive to the
north. A Reciprocal Easement Agreement will be entered into between Buyer and Seller
appointing one party the maintaining owner of any common improvements within the easement
area.
From these easement areas, private utilities, drainage and roads can be extended in the future to
serve adjacent property.
Stormwater / Wetlands / Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)
Application has been made to RCWD for both Wetland Mitigation approval and a
Stormwater Permit and is currently under review.
• The proposed fill of existing wetlands along 21st Avenue North is proposed to be
offset by the purchase of wetland mitigation credits.
• The southwest corner of the proposed development is currently a stormwater pond
that receives runoff from 21st Avenue North and the other stormwater ponds on
the east side of 21st Avenue North. The pond then outflows to the southwest to
connect to City storm sewer. This pond is currently subject to a rectangular
Drainage and Utility Easement. We are proposing to reconfigure the pond area,
including construction of a retaining wall (approximately 4.5’ tall at its highest
point) to reduce the size but maintain the same volume within the pond. A portion
of the Drainage and Utility Easement is to be vacated.
• Other stormwater requirements for the new development are proposed to be
satisfied by a shared, underground stormwater facility that discharges into the
reconfigured pond in the southwest corner of the development.
∆
∆
Anoka County, MN
VICINITY MAP
Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
Site
35E
24
OUTLOT A
Du
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3
Block 1
ΔΔΔ
Δ
Δ
Gc
NeA
NoA
Wb
Du
Du
Wb
Wb
Attachment 3. Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat
∆
Outlot A
Anoka County, MN
VICINITY MAP
Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
Δ
Du
Gc
NeA
NoA
Wb
Du
Site
35E
24
∆
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3
Outlot A
Δ
Δ
∆
Δ
Block 1
Δ
Du
Wb
Wb
Anoka County, MN
VICINITY MAP
Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
Site
35E
24
Du
∆
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3
Outlot A
Δ
∆
Block 1
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Anoka County, MN
VICINITY MAP
Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rng. 22
Site
35E
24
Du
GMSB
L
SB
L
SBL SBL SBL
SB
L
SBL
SBL
SBL
CHIPOTLE
2,325 S.F
29 STALLS.
FUTURE RETAIL2,230 S.F.28 STALLS
FUTURE AUTO SERVICE1,870 S.F.9 STALLS
DR
I
V
E
THR
U
ENT
R
Y
DRIVE
THRUENTRY
DO
N
O
T
ENT
E
R
BYPASS
DO NOT ENTER
MAIN ST.
21
S
T
A
V
E
.
N
NO
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
NO P
A
R
K
I
N
G
NO P
A
R
K
I
N
G
DO NOT
ENTER
CHIPOTLE2,325 S.F29 STALLS.
FUTURE RETAIL2,230 S.F.28 STALLS
FUTURE AUTO SERVICE1,870 S.F.9 STALLS
DRIVETHRUENTRY
DRIVETHRUENTRY
DO NO
TENTER
BYPASS
DO NOTENTER
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
NO PARKING
DO NOTENTER
MAIN ST
21
S
T
A
V
E
.
N
I-
3
5
E
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:
TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002
MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
SI
T
E
B
A
S
E
11
:
4
7
A
M
N:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
\
2
4
-
0
2
5
5
.
0
0
C
R
E
R
e
t
a
i
l
L
i
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
\
C
i
v
i
l
\
C
A
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
S
i
t
e
C
.
d
w
g
3/
7
/
2
0
2
5
N
SCALE:
0'80'160'
1"=80'
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DA
T
E
NO
.
RE
V
FI
L
E
N
O
.
:
DW
G
F
I
L
E
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
DE
S
I
G
N
B
Y
:
DA
T
E
:
SHEET NO.
LA
N
D
S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
CI
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
13
0
7
6
F
I
R
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
,
B
E
C
K
E
R
,
M
N
5
5
3
0
8
-
9
3
2
2
TE
L
:
7
6
3
-
2
6
2
-
8
8
2
2
F
A
X
:
7
6
3
-
2
6
2
-
8
8
4
4
BO
G
A
R
T
,
P
E
D
E
R
S
O
N
&
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
,
I
N
C
.
CH
I
P
O
T
L
E
,
R
E
T
A
I
L
,
&
A
U
T
O
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
R
E
A
L
E
S
T
A
T
E
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
i
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
A
n
o
k
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
M
N
03
/
0
7
/
2
0
2
5
24
-
0
2
5
5
.
0
0
CJ
D
,
M
J
M
MJ
M
MJ
M
1
0
1
/
0
2
/
2
0
2
5
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
P
E
R
R
C
W
D
R
E
V
I
E
W
I
h
e
r
e
b
y
c
e
r
t
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
p
l
a
n
,
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
o
r
re
p
o
r
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
m
e
o
r
u
n
d
e
r
m
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
su
p
e
r
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
I
a
m
a
d
u
l
y
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
d
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
w
s
o
f
t
h
e
St
a
t
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
.
Si
g
n
e
d
:
Da
t
e
:
L
i
c
.
N
o
.
Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
J
.
D
a
h
n
58
6
2
8
03
/
0
7
/
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
/
0
5
/
2
0
2
5
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
P
E
R
I
M
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
L
E
T
T
E
R
R
E
V
I
E
W
3
0
3
/
0
7
/
2
0
2
5
R
C
W
D
R
E
V
I
E
W
TO
T
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
C1
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PROPOSED TURF ESTABLISHMENT (SOD)
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612
LEGEND:
PROPOSED SIGN
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
KEY PLAN
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED CHIPOTLE FUTURE RETAIL
FUTURE AUTO SERVICE
Attachment 4. Total Site Plan
17
8
E
9
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
|
SU
I
T
E
2
0
0
| SA
I
N
T
P
A
U
L
,
M
N
|
55
1
0
1
|
65
1
.
2
8
6
.
8
4
5
0
|
WS
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner
From: Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer
Date: May 7, 2025
Re: Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat Review 028758-000
WSB reviewed the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Clearwater Commons site in Lino Lakes, MN, received April 14, 2025. The site is approximately 14.1 acres and located east of 21st Avenue and north of Main Street. Comments were made on the following documents:
•Clearwater Commons – Preliminary Plat submittal prepared Bogart, Pederson &Associates, dated March 7, 2025, received April 14, 2025.
The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. There are additional redline comments on the plan set that should be responded to as well. Not all redline comments are in the review memo.
Engineering
•General
The Clearwater Commons commercial development proposes to create three (3) current
commercial lots with looping access from 21st Avenue North through the site to the private
street to the north and outlots the remaining area for future commercial development. A
Master plan was provided that laid out an idea of how the remaining outloted areas could be
platted in the future.
•Grading
A grading and drainage plan was provided for the site which included paved areas, curb, and retaining walls for the initial Chipotle site as well as the looping access to the private road to the north.
Comments: 1.See comments provided on Chipotle Site review memo and plan redlines2.Provide all structure inlet elevations3.Provide EOF elevations, locations and routes for all low points4.Per Anoka County Reviewa.Internal site grading shall not commence until the requested ACHDEngineering plan approvals are received and the applicable permits can beissued.b.As proposed, the plat will not introduce any new access points onto CSAH14, and the right of access is dedicated to Anoka County in the plat. Any
Attachment 5. City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025
Ms. Katie Larsen 5/7/2025 Page 2
Clearwater Commons – Engineering Review
existing driveways and field entrances shall be removed, and the ditch section restored to match existing depth, slope, and grades. c. Please note that no plantings or private signs will be permitted within the
county right of way and care must be exercised when locating private signs, building, structures, plantings, berms, etc. outside of the county right of way, so as not to create any new sight obstructions for this section of CSAH 14.
• Stormwater Management
The stormwater management calculations for the Clearwater Commons preliminary plat match those of the Chipotle site, see comments for that site. Additional comments on detailed storm sewer review may still come up for the non-Chipotle lots as they submit for
site plan reviews.
• Water Supply
The existing 8” watermain stub at the intersection with 21st Avenue will be utilized and
extended to the eastern limits of the development to serve the 3 commercial lots to the south and potentially one or more of the future commercial lots to the north. Comments: 1. We recommend that the City Deputy Director of Public Safety-Fire Division review the proposed plan for water supply and hydrant coverage. a. Verify adequate fire flows for 8” non-looped design 2. Call out all utility crossings a. Provide minimum 18" separation between water and sewer b. Insulate when separation between water and storm sewer is less than 36" 3. Provide utility service(s) for future commercial lots to the north a. Consider extending watermain along access road north and looping to Michaud Way to improve resiliency and limit impacts to the roadway with possible future utility installations. 4. Note existing 8" gate valve shown on watermain stub in record plans a. Test existing gate valve (2015) and if keeping i. Connect to existing 8" DIP watermain; delete proposed 8" gate valve if not keeping ii. Remove existing 8" DIP pipe back to and including existing gate valve; Connect to existing 8" DIP watermain with new 8" gate valve 5. Install 8" gate valve to isolate Lot 1/Chipotle service 6. Call out phase limits for Lot 2 water service
• Sanitary Sewer
The existing 8” sanitary sewer stub at the intersection with 21st Avenue will be utilized and extended to the eastern limits of the development to serve the 3 commercial lots to the south and potentially one or more of the future commercial lots to the north.
Comments:
Ms. Katie Larsen 5/7/2025 Page 3
Clearwater Commons – Engineering Review
1. Match existing sanitary sewer pipe slope (0.40% - field verify) from connection through to first structure 2. Adjust SAN MH 1-6 location such that angles are at or greater than 90 degrees
a. Avoid placing in proposed wheel paths b. Better clarify (provide detail) how the proposed 3’+ drop will be achieved 3. Consider 6" (instead of 4”) diameter services for Lots 1& 2 for future flexibility of commercial tenants 4. DOLI typically requires minimum 2.00% slope with service pipes less than 8"
• Transportation
The current Clearwater Commons development proposes extending an access road to
the east from the existing entrance at 21st Avenue and extending to the eastern
development limits. A second access road is proposed to be teed from the first access
road to the north to connect to Michaud Way. A traffic study and analysis was conducted for the overall development and redline comments will be provided for the submitted study. Comments: 1. A right-in right-out access is required at the intersection of the access road with 21st Avenue a. A median (porkchop) at the intersection will be required to direct traffic 2. The submitted Traffic Impact Study is in the process of being reviewed and additional comments will be forthcoming. 3. Provide specific typical sections for access roads a. Note proposed road crown or cross drainage 4. Per Anoka County Review a. As proposed, the plat will not introduce any new access points onto CSAH 14, and the right of access is dedicated to Anoka County in the plat.
• Wetlands and Mitigation Plan
The site is proposing to impact 28,573 square feet of an existing wetland. This impact is proposed to be offset by purchasing wetland credits.
• Landscaping
The City’s Environmental Coordinator to review landscaping and provide additional in-depth comments when provided.
Comments:
1. It is recommended that tree plantings are deconflicted with drainage structures to avoid future root intrusion. This conflict is present for CBMH 4-8.
• Floodplain
Ms. Katie Larsen 5/7/2025 Page 4
Clearwater Commons – Engineering Review
No floodplain impacts are proposed on site.
• Drainage and Utility Easements Comments: 1. Clarify limits of public and private utilities a. Additional utility easements are to be provided with shared utility mainline extensions (not services). 2. Drainage and utility easements are required for stormwater systems. This includes the area encompassing the 100-yr HWL of any BMPs. Existing utility (sanitary and water) easements to remain and additional utility easements are to be provided
with shared utility mainline extensions (not services).
3. The full footprint of the underground BMP must be contained within a drainage and
utility easement. 4. Per Anoka County Review a. The existing right of way along CSAH 14 is approximately 80 feet north of centerline which should be sufficient for future reconstruction purposes.
• Development Agreement
A Development Agreement will be required with the final plat.
• Grading Agreement Grading agreement not required at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater facilities will be privately maintained and a Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities will be required. Both the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and the City of Lino Lakes shall be parties to the Declaration.
• Permits Required
1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for construction 3. MDH Watermain Extension
4. MPCA/MCES Sanitary Sewer Main Extension
If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner
From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
Date: April 30, 2025
Re: Environmental Comments – Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat
Environmental Board had recommended the following at their April 30, 2025 meeting:
1.Recommend stubbing or extending future sidewalk to the north along the
proposed road for future pedestrian connections.
2.Sidewalk can be added when additional lots are subdivided for development.
Stubbing the sidewalk now will make sure the pedestrian ramps will be in
compliance and not have to regrade or remove existing walk.
3.Ten trees are proposed for impacts on the resource inventory page. Provide a
tree survey of all trees onsite that are significant.
4.Trees to be removed should be categorized by area. If they are in the basic use
area mitigation is not required. Trees within an ESA require additional
mitigation.
5.Landscaping and planting requirements are to be met individually as each lot
develops.
6.Show maintenance access to the new proposed outlet to the existing sw
stormwater basin. It appears that the proposed retaining wall would limit future
maintenance.
7.Currently proposing sod along the SW stormwater basin. This area should have a
native buffer. Use MNDOT seed mix to establish buffer
8.Sod is being proposed along private road, recommend using low mow turf grass
or native grasses where feasible.
9.Water conservation should be considered by reducing areas that need required
maintenance and watering.
10.Stormwater management for the site is to be reviewed by the City Engineer and
will be required for each site to meet requirements at the time of building.
11.Proposed underground filtration will require pretreatment and additional access
points for future maintenance and inspection.
Environmental Memo
Attachment 6. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated May 5, 2025
Page 2
12. Redundant perimeter control is shown around wetlands and existing stormwater
facilities. Note or show detail that redundant perimeter control should be
spaced 3-5’ apart.
13. Final review of erosion and sediment control will be completed with final plans.
14. Review of rare, unique, and sensitive areas should be completed for the site.
Primarily areas of wetland impact should be included to verify there are no rare
or endangered wetland species.
15. Copy of final NPDES permit will be required be issuance of grading permit. All
requirements for the SWPPP shall meet MPCA design standards.
16. Provide a Blandings Turtle mitigation plan
a.
Attachment 7. Anoka County Highway Department Letter dated April 30, 2025
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis MN 55402-2314
May 6, 2025
Athanasia Lewis – Interim City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Ms. Lewis,
Reference: Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review – Clearwater Commons (City of Lino Lakes)
We have reviewed the site plan dated March 12, 2025 for the proposed Chipotle site located in the
northeast quadrant of CSAH 14 (Main Street) and 21st Avenue North in Lino Lakes. The following are our
comments regarding the proposed development:
Traffic Engineering Notes
1.The applicant should submit a traffic engineering report detailing the proposed traffic impacts to 21st
Avenue North.2.Turn lanes should be striped on southbound 21st Avenue N to the immediate north of the east-westaccess road to the proposed commercial development.
General Notes
1.The Owner must sweep all sediment from 21st Avenue Nand any adjacent streets daily duringconstruction.2.The owner must regularly maintain and replace inlet protection within 21st Avenue duringconstruction.3.City staff will monitor any erosion or tracking of dirt within the City of Centerville.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Kellie Schlegel, PESenior Associate, Project Manager Phone: (612) 712-2125 kellie.schlegel@stantec.com
Attachment 8. City of Centerville Letter dated May 6, 2025
Metropolitan District
Waters Edge Building
1500 County Road B-2 West
Roseville, MN 55113
Page 1 of 2
May 14, 2025
Katie Larsen
City Planner
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
SUBJECT: Clearwater Commons and Chipotle
MnDOT Review #P25-020
NW quad of I35E and Main St (CSAH 14)
Lino Lakes, Anoka County
Dear Katie Larsen,
Plats
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the preliminary plat for Clearwater
Commons and Chipotle, in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. MnDOT has the
following comments:
Water Resources
A MnDOT drainage permit may be required before development occurs. The permit applicant shall demonstrate
that the off-site runoff entering MnDOT drainage system(s) and/or right of way will not increase. The drainage
permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to:
https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload this letter with the drainage permit application.
The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application:
1.Grading plans, drainage plans, and hydraulic calculations demonstrating that proposed flows to MnDOT
right of way remain the same as existing conditions or are reduced.
2.Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the
submitted calculations.
3.Hydro CAD model and PDF of output for the 2, 10, and 100-year Atlas 14 storm events.
Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional
information may be requested. Please contact Jason Swenson, Water Resources Engineering, at
jason.swenson@state.mn.us or 651-234-7539 with any questions.
Transit
Route 275 travels on 21st Ave to a park-and-ride just north of the development site. This may have impacts to
transit operations, and we recommend you inform Metro Transit of this project.
Please coordinate with Metro Transit at the following email address if there are any impacts to bus stops in the
area: Transit-BusOps-StreetSup-AssistManagers@metc.state.mn.us.
Attachment 10. MnDOT Letter dated May 14, 2025
Page 2 of 2
Please contact Amrish Patel, Transit Advantages Coordinator, at amrish.patel@state.mn.us or 651-234-7949,
with any questions.
Permits
No permanent impacts to MnDOT right of way are allowed. Any work that affects MnDOT right of way will
require an appropriate permit. All permits are available and must be applied at:
https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Upload this letter when applying for permits.
For questions regarding permit submittal requirements, please contact Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro District
Permits Section at buck.craig@state.mn.us or 651-775-0405.
Review Submittal Options
MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be
processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review
materials may be submitted as:
1.Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB
(megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each
email.
2.Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site:
https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared
folder in which files can be uploaded to. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the
development.
You are welcome to contact me at regina.burstein@state.mn.us with any questions.
Sincerely,
Regina Burstein
Senior Planner
Copy sent via email:
Jason Swenson, Water Resources
Buck Craig, Permits
Chinou Vue, Right of Way
Yuping Wu, Right of Way
Rabi Pariyar, Traffic
Brandi Kastner, Traffic
Amrish Patel, Transit
Michael Parent, Area Engineer
Mohammad Dehdashti, Design
Michael Kowski, Maintenance
Suzy Scotty, Ped/Bike/ADA Planning
Keith Jakober, Surveying
Tod Sherman, Planning
Cameron Muhic, Planning
Scott Shaffer, Planning
Joseph Widing, Metropolitan Council
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 25-78
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLEARWATER COMMONS PRELIMINARY PLAT
WHEREAS, the City received a land use application for Clearwater Commons preliminary
plat (“Development”); and
WHEREAS, City staff completed review of the Development based on the following
submittals:
• Certificate of Survey prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated January 10,
2025
• Resource Inventory prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated January 10,
2025
• Preliminary Plat prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated February 24,
2025
• Civil Plan Set prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated March 7, 2025
• Stormwater Management Report prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc.
dated March 7, 2025
• Project Narrative dated March 3, 2025
• Easement Exhibits prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. dated February 24,
2025
• Traffic Study prepared by SSTS LLC dated April 2, 2025; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on May 14,
2025 and the Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat with a 7-0 vote.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Per City Code Section 1001.013, Premature Subdivision:
(1) General. Any concept plan, preliminary plat or final plat deemed premature pursuant to
the following criteria shall be denied by the City Council.
(2) Conditions for establishing a premature subdivision. A subdivision may be deemed
premature should any of the following conditions not be met.
(a) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Including any of the following:
1. Land use plan;
2. Transportation plan;
3. Utility (sewer and water) plans;
2
4. Local water management plan;
5. Capital improvement plan; and
6. Growth management policies, including MUSA allocation criteria.
Clearwater Commons preliminary plat is consistent with the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan.
(b) Consistency with infill policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the city's infill
policies:
1. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the city's Comprehensive Plan;
2. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by one or more of the
following:
a. An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision;
b. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the
developer;
c. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with
available city trunk funds; and
d. The cost and timing of the expenditure of city funds are consistent with the city's
capital improvement plan.
3. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the
normal costs as projected by the water and sewer rate study; and
4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future
operation and maintenance.
Clearwater Commons preliminary plat is consistent with infill policies. The development is within
the current Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025). The cost and timing of the expenditure of city
funds are consistent with the city’s capital improvement plan. The cost, operation and
maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs projected by the water
and sanitary rate study. No future utility costs are proposed.
(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the
following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity
Manual:
1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic
generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one
grade;
2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a
proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C;
3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a
proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D;
4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access
to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must
3
provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of
service D or better;
5.Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the
structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or
the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies;
6.The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street
improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan.
However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to
correct any street deficiencies;
7.The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake
Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be
evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to
resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision
project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the
improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project
contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that
contribute to traffic at the interchange; and
8.The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
Clearwater Commons preliminary plat meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). The
proposed Level of Service does not degrade by more than one (1) LOS; therefore, the
development is not considered premature. Existing roads and intersections providing access to
the subdivision have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the
proposed subdivision. No street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s
capital improvement plan. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
(d)Water supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water
supply when:
1.The city water system has adequate wells, storage or pipe capacity to serve the
subdivision;
2.The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes water plan and offers the
opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision;
3.The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal use
and fire protection; and
4.The rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided
with a potable water supply.
Clearwater Commons preliminary plat will have an adequate water supply.
(e)Waste disposal systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste
disposal systems when:
1.The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the city's MUSA or is consistent with
the MUSA allocation criteria;
4
2.The city has sufficient MUSA and pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to
its maximum density;
3.The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes sewer plan
and capital improvement plan;
4.A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate
sanitary sewer disposal system; and
5.A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water system has an
effective long range management and maintenance program with proper financing.
Clearwater Commons preliminary plat will be served with an adequate waste disposal system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Clearwater Commons preliminary plat is not a premature
subdivision; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Clearwater Commons preliminary plat is approved
subject to the following conditions:
1.A shared access, parking, and maintenance agreement and exhibit shall be recorded.
2.The Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement per Doc. No. 2084186.005 shall be vacated
contingent upon filing of the final plat.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the following items shall be addressed in conjunction with
the Clearwater Commons final plat land use application submittal:
1.All comments from the City Engineer memo dated May 7, 2025.
2.All comments from the Environmental Coordinator memo dated May 5, 2025.
3.All comments from Anoka County Transportation Division letter dated April 30, 2025.
4.All comments from City of Centerville letter dated May 6, 2025.
5.Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plat:
a.Include standard drainage and utility detail.
6.Preliminary Plan, Title Page:
a.Rename Clearwater Commons Preliminary Plans
7.Sheet C3, South Site Plan:
a.Right in/right out access to south driveway shall be clearly shown.
b.A minimum of five (5) feet is required between the trash enclosure/parking lot
and back of curb.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _________day of ______________,
2025.
5
___________________________
Rob Rafferty, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Roberta Colotti, CMC, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner
WORK SESSION DATE: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Nelson Rehbein PUD Concept Plan Review
______________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Twin Cities Land Holding, LLC, is proposing a residential development in the
southwest quadrant of CSAH 54 (20th Ave S) and Cedar Avenue. The development contains
three (3) parcels totaling approximately 25 gross acres and 90 housing units.
Tentative Review Schedule:
Complete Application Date: April 14, 2025
60-Day Deadline: June 13, 2025
Environmental Board Meeting: April 30, 2025
Park Board Meeting: May 7, 2025
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: May 14, 2025
City Council Work Session: June 2, 2025
City Council Meeting: N/A
The Land Use Application is for the following:
• PUD Concept Plan/Concept Plan (“concept plan”)
Future land use applications may include:
• Rezone property from R, Rural to R2, R3, or PUD
• PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat
• PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
This staff report is based on the following submittals:
• Applicant Narrative dated April 10, 2025
2
• Concept Plans prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 21, 2025
• Net Area Exhibit prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 21, 2025
• Resource Inventory prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 21, 2025
• Concept Yield Plan prepared by Carlson McCain dated March 21, 2025
BACKGROUND
Current Proposal
The development will consist of 38 single-family homes on 60ft wide lots and 52 townhomes for
a total of 90 housing units. See the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed description of
the development.
Land Use
The following table includes land uses, acres and %.
Land Use Acres %
CSAH 54 ROW 0.22 0.9%
Internal ROW 2.89 11.8%
60ft Single Family Lots 8.41 34.3%
Townhome Lots 2.30 9.4%
Townhome Common Lots 4.03 16.4%
Townhome Private Drives 0.83 3.4%
Open Space 2.67 6.0%
Wetlands (in outlots) 1.00 9.0%
Floodplain 2.20 9.0%
TOTAL 24.55 100.0%
Total open space (townhome common lots, open space, wetlands, floodplain) is approximately
9.9 acres or 40%.
ANALYSIS
Existing Conditions
Per the Narrative, the 11 acre Nelson parcel contains an existing house and accessory
structures. The 14 acre Rehbein parcels have been used for agricultural purposes. A 30ft wide
powerline easement exists along the west lot lines. Wetlands and floodplain exist on site.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
3
Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future
Land Use
North City of Centerville Industrial Industrial
South R-1, Single Family
Residential
Single family
residential
Low Density
Residential
East R, Rural Rural Residential Medium Density
West City of Centerville Agriculture City of Centerville
Comprehensive Plan
Land Use
Per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the 25 acre site is guided medium density residential
which requires 4.0-6.0 units per net acre.
Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is in Planning District 3. There are no specific
planning goals or issues that need to be addressed for this site.
Density
The following chart is a preliminary density analysis using Met Council’s density formula:
Gross Area (acres) 24.55
Wetlands & Water Bodies (1.81)
Public Parks & Open Space 0.00
Arterial ROW (0.22)
Other (Utility Transmission Easement) (0.54)
Other (Wetland Buffer Area) (0.84)
Other (Floodplain Mitigation) (1.21)
Net Area (acres) 19.93
# of Units 90
Gross Density (units/acre) 3.67
Net Density (units/acre) 4.52
The site is guided medium density residential which requires 4.0-6.0 units per net acre.
The proposed development is 4.52 units per net acre, which is consistent with land use and
density requirements.
4
Growth Management Strategy
Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City’s Growth Management Strategy.
The strategy works in conjunction with the City’s utility staging plan.
The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5-year
phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2024, the City’s average
annual number of units is 123. This is less than the allowed 230 unit annual allocation.
The proposed 90 lot development would be consistent with the growth management strategy.
Current Zoning and Land Use
Current Zoning R, Rural
Current Land Use Agricultural and Rural Residential
Future Land Use per
2040 Comp Plan Medium Density Residential
Utility Staging Area Stage 1B (2025-2030)
Rezoning
The site is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal
water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in
having the property developed.
The developer is proposing R2, Two Family Residential for the 60ft wide single family lots and
PUD, Planned Unit Development for the townhomes.
PUD flexibility requested:
1. Public street cul de sac length: 555ft > 500ft allowed
2. Private street length: 666ft > 300ft allowed
3. Private street width: 24ft < 26ft required
4. Corner lot setback: 20ft < 25ft required
5. Townhome base lot size: 7,800ft < 20,000sf required
6. Townhome garage size: 440sf < 520sf required
a. Staff notes that building plans are not required during concept plan. The
townhome garage footprint was measured off the concept plan.
Staff believes the proposed single family and townhome development can be achieved using
straight zoning. Staff recommends R2, Two Family zoning for the single family lots and R3,
Medium Density zoning for the townhomes.
5
Staff Comment:
1. Does the Board feel there is public benefit to justify PUD zoning as required per City
Code Section 1007.024:
(2) The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this chapter related to
setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., may be considered by the city when it
would result in one or more of the following public benefits:
(a) Implementation of a master plan consistent with the Planning District objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: A master plan is not required for this area.
(b) Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in lot size, configuration, home type, design, enhanced architectural
standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in
such developments.
(c) Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as wildlife habitat,
unique natural resources, existing vegetation, natural topography, geologic features and
reduction of negative impacts on the environment.
(d) Creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and
orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other.
(e) Efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments.
(f) Mix of land use types.
(g) Provision of a housing type or target housing price that is desirable to the city.
(h) Other public benefits and values as recognized in the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Lot and Setback Requirements
Per City Code Section 1007.112(1), land that is guided medium density residential may be zoned
R-2. The following table analyzes the R-2 requirements for the 60ft wide single family lots.
60ft Single Family Lots R-2
Requirements
Proposed
Concept Plan
Min. Lot Size 7,500 sf 7,500 – 14,000 sf
6
Min. Lot Width
--Interior Lot 60 ft 60ft
--Corner Lot 80 ft 80 ft
Min. Lot Depth 125 ft 125 -145ft
--Double Frontage 135 ft NA
Building Setback (ft)
-From Streets 25 ft 25 ft
-Rear Yard
--Principal 25 ft 25 ft
-Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
-Side Yard
--Principal 10 ft 10 ft
--Accessory 5 ft 10 ft
Buffer Abutting Arterial St 15 ft wide NA
Impervious Surface 65% Evaluated w/
building permit
Per City Code Section 1007.113(1), land that is guided medium density residential may be zoned
R-3. The following table analyzes the R-3 requirements for the townhomes.
Townhomes R-3
Requirements
Proposed
Concept Plan
Min. Base Lot Size 24,000 sf 7,800 – 11,500 sfa
Min. Base Lot Width 100 ft 114 ft
Min. Lot Depth None NA
Building Setback (ft)
-From Arterial Streets
(20th Ave S) 40 ft 60 ft
-From Local Streets 30 ft 20 fta
-Rear Yard
--Principal 30 ft 10 fta
-Accessory 5 ft 5 ft
7
-Side Yard
--Principal 10 ft 5 fta
--Accessory 5 ft NA
From Low Density
Residential 35 ft 90 ft
Buffer From LDR or
Arterial Street 20 ft Required
Impervious Surface 65% Evaluated w/
building permit
a Setbacks shall be met or PUD flexibility required.
Building Design Standards and Other Performance Standards
Building and architectural design standard review is not required at concept plan level. City
Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential building design standard requirements. City
Code Section 1007.112(4) details minimum R-2 building requirements. City Code Section
1007.113(4) details minimum R-3 building requirements.
Staff Comment:
1. All building design standards and requirements shall be met.
Subdivision Ordinance
Blocks and Lots
The concept plan proposes 90 residential lots and three (3) outlots. Outlots will contain
wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. Common lots around the townhomes will also be
outlots.
Streets and Alleys
CSAH 54 (20th Ave S) is an A-Minor Arterial Reliever road. Street A onto 20th Ave S. will be right
in/right out only. Internal streets have 60ft wide road right-of-way and are 30ft wide. Private
streets are proposed for the townhomes. An emergency access lane onto 20th Avenue S is
proposed on the south end for the townhomes.
Staff Comments:
1. Sixty (60) feet of road right-of-way shall be dedicated along CSAH 54 from the section
line.
8
2. Sidewalk shall be installed along Street A and Street B.
3. Private streets shall meet requirements of City Code Section 1007.054 if PUD flexibility is
not provided.
4. Private Drive C shall provide access to the lot to 6795 20th Avenue S for future
development.
5. A traffic study shall be required.
6. A noise study shall be required.
Easements
Staff Comments:
1. Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide shall be provided along all
lot lines.
2. Drainage and utility easements shall also be dedicated over stormwater management
facilities.
3. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be required over wetlands, ditches,
and greenway corridors.
Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control
The concept plan shows two (2) stormwater ponds throughout the development.
Public Utilities
Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development.
The site is in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-district 3D). Flow from these areas, including that
from Centerville, is collected along East Cedar Street and conveyed east to MCES
Meter M220 and Gravity Interceptor 802325.
The site is in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025).
Per the City Engineer memo, the City’s water supply system well firm capacity is currently
constrained by poor water quality in some wells, and annual variability in water use due to
drought and other factors. Based on the water supply capacity and well trigger analysis
completed in April 2024, the city may need additional well(s) to accommodate development
within the City’s existing 2040 Utility Staging Area. While the City’s Comprehensive Plan
identifies the need for additional wells to support continued growth, the White Bear Lake
District Court orders and ongoing litigation, currently prevents the City from implementing that
plan.
The City is currently working through the well approval process with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR). This action does not contemplate capacity for
9
areas outside the current Utility Staging area. Without additional well capacity proposed
developments may be deemed premature. The developments will be evaluated on a case by
case basis to determine actual demand and availability of capacity to serve the development.
Any proposed development will need to demonstrate methods to reduce water use including
but not limited to stormwater reuse for irrigation
Staff Comments:
1. The water supply issue needs to be addressed prior to preliminary plat submittal.
Yield Plan
As required per City Code Section 1001.026(4) for a PUD, the applicant submitted the attached
yield plan. A yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted
given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other
requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters.
The yield plan proposes 121 townhome units at 5.98 units per net acre which would be
consistent with density requirements.
Phasing Plan
Per the narrative, the developer plans to commence with development in the Fall 2025 that will
align within the projected service date. The site is planned to be built within one (1) phase of
grading and one (1) phase of street & utilities.
Traffic Study
A traffic study is required at the time of preliminary plat submittal.
Staff Comments:
1. The applicant shall work with Anoka County Highway Department regarding access,
emergency access, and turn lanes on CSAH 54 (20th Avenue S.).
Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan
Per Figure 10-2: Neighborhood Service Areas of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan, a future
neighborhood park is programmed to the southwest of this site. Trails are not required per the
park plan. The City will require cash in lieu of land dedication.
Tree Preservation and Landscaping
10
A Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan in compliance with Section 1007.043(17),
Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards shall be submitted with the preliminary plat
application.
Staff Comments:
1. A landscaping screen and minimum 20 ft wide buffer will be required along the 20th
Avenue S.
2. A noise study will be required with the preliminary plat.
3. Berm and/or any noise mitigation requirements shall be measured from side or rear
yard ground elevations to top of berm or fence.
EQB Environmental Review
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not mandated. The 38 unattached units and 52
attached units are under the threshold required for a mandatory EAW.
Wetlands
The site includes 2.2 acres of wetland. The wetlands are not within the Wetland Management
Corridor. Ten (10) ft wide buffers are provided. It appears there will be some wetland impacts.
An approved wetland delineation and mitigation plan will be required. The applicant will need
to work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act regulations.
Floodplain
The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain on site. The concept plan shows a
floodplain mitigation area in the southwest corner of the development.
Staff Comments:
1. Any floodplain impacts are subject to City requirements per City Code Chapter 1103.
2. A Base Flood Elevation is required to be determined, using detailed methods acceptable
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
3. A FEMA CLOMR and LOMR may be required for development if there are floodplain
impacts.
Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments
Anoka County
Anoka County Highway Department comments are in the attached email.
School District
11
Centennial ISD#12 did not provide comments.
Lino Lakes Public Safety
Police Division reviewed the concept plan and had no concerns.
Fire Division reviewed the concept plan and had no concerns.
City Engineer
City Engineer comments are in the attached memo.
Environmental Board
Environmental Board comments are in the attached memo.
Park Board
During the May 7, 2025 meeting, the Park Board recommended 100% cash dedication in lieu of
land. Several existing Nadeau Acres residents addressed the Park Board requesting
consideration for a neighborhood park in the Nelson Rehbein development.
As discussed with the development of Nadeau Acres, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan does not
show the Nelson Rehbein property as having a park or part of the greenway system. Rather,
future Neighborhood Park E is planned to the west.
Planning & Zoning Board
The Board reviewed the concept plan on May 14, 2025. Discussion items included:
• No PUD, proceed with straight zoning.
• Include sidewalks along streets.
• Access spacing, right in/right out and emergency access along 20th Avenue.
• Neighborhood meeting suggested.
Preliminary Plat
The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop the
property as depicted by the concept plan.
A land use application for preliminary plat is required. The city strongly recommends the
property owner/applicant hold a neighborhood meeting for informal comment and feedback
prior to preliminary plat application.
12
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is requesting feedback from the City Council:
1. Thoughts on requested PUD or just straight R2 and R3 zoning.
2. If PUD, then should a neighborhood meeting be required?
3. Should future access and ghost plat be provided to 6737 20th Avenue?
a. The lot is guided low density residential and appears to have wetlands on site
that would limit future development.
4. Other input.
Additional Staff Comments:
1. The wetland and floodplain acreages on the Concept plan and Net Area Exhibit do not
match.
2. Side corner setbacks shall be 25ft.
3. A ghost plat for 6795 20th Avenue shall be provided if a preliminary plat is submitted.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Applicant Narrative
2. Concept Plan
3. Net Area Exhibit
4. Resource Inventory
5. Yield Plan
6. City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025
7. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated April 30, 2025
8. Anoka County Comments dated May 1, 2025
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE
NELSON REHBEIN PARCELS
LINO LAKES, MN
April 10, 2025
Twin Cities Land Holding, LLC is pleased to submit the proposed Concept Plan for the
development of the Nelson and Rehbein parcels located in Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota.
DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Developer/Contract Buyer: Twin Cities Land Holdings, LLC
Ben Schmidt, President ben@TCLandDev.com (612)-716-3047
Christine Cook, Development Manager
christine@TClandDev.com (612)710-0685
4800 Olson Memorial Hwy, Suite 100
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Civil Engineer/Surveyor: Carlson Engineering
Brian Krystofiak, Engineer
bkrystofiak@carlson-engineering.com (763)443-5963
Justin Olson, Engineer
jolson@carlson-engineering.com
(763)280-4367
3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE Blaine, MN 55449
Legal: Mark Radke MRadke@Felhaber.com
Attachment 1. Applicant Narrative
SITE INFORMATION:
Legal Description:
Address: 6747 20th Avenue (Nelson parcel), Lino Lakes, MN 55038 / Unassigned (Rehbein parcels) City/County: City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County
Parcel ID Numbers: 26-31-22-11-0008 (Nelson); 26-32-22-11-0005 (Rehbein); 26-31-22-11-0009
(Rehbein)
Total Site Area: Approximately (24.55) acres
Existing Zoning: R - Rural Proposed Rezoning: R2 – Two Family Residential /Planned Unit Development (PUD)
EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is comprised of three (3) land parcels, one (1) single family home on the southern portion (Nelson’s parcel), a wooded swale that runs through the middle of the site that is shown as wetlands
within the exhibits, along with the rest of the site as agricultural fields.
The land parcel currently owned by the Nelson family, was acquired by Jim Nelson in 1987. Shortly thereafter, he began construction on his home. The property had historically been vacant
agriculture land prior to Jim purchasing the property. Jim then constructed a pole barn in 1995 and is currently residing at the property.
The two (2) Rehbein land parcels were purchased by the Rehbein family in 2008. No structures or dwellings were ever constructed on the property by the Rehbein family, and both land parcels have been utilized for agriculture purposes, specifically raising hay.
Per discussions with both property owners, they confirmed there are no historically important
landscapes or archeological features to note. The site is bounded to the east by 20th Avenue S (County Road 54), to the south by the Nadeau Acres development, to the west by existing farm fields and floodplain, and to the north by an
existing industrial building, large wetland and floodplain. The northern and western boundaries
of the site are the city limits between the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Centerville. The current zoning for the three (3) land parcels is R – Rural. PROPOSED CONDITIONS & CONCEPT PLAN SUMMARY
The 2040 Future Land Use Map displays this area as medium density residential that allows for 4.0 to 6.0 units per acre. We are proposing R2 – Two Family Residential for the 60’ single-family lots, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the multi-unit townhomes and private streets to meet the allowed density requirement. Per the net area exhibit, we calculate a net density of 4.26
units per net acre, or 3.67 units per gross acre. With standard R2 zoning for the multi-unit
townhomes, the density falls to 2.5 units per net acre and will not meet the allowed density requirement. The Nelson Rehbein Concept Plan displays a total of (90) residential lots that consist of the
following:
• (38) 60’ Single-Family
• (52) Attached Townhome
Below is a summary of the proposed lot standards and setbacks: Townhome Unit Configuration (4) Unit, (5) Unit & (6) Unit Buildings Townhome Setbacks Front – 25 feet Side - Between Townhome Buildings – 20 feet Side Corner – 20 feet Single Family Setbacks: Front – 25 feet Rear – 25 feet Side Yard – 10 ft Garage, 10 ft Dwelling
Side Corner – 20/25 feet
We believe the proposed development plan is consistent with the City of Lino Lake’s goals for
these parcels. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN:
The proposed development will connect to existing, public sanitary sewer from the Nadeau Acres
development to the south. This sanitary stub is directed to an existing lift station that was designed and constructed to accommodate the Nelson Rehbein development. Public watermain connections will be made at the existing connection to Nadeau Acres, as well as along 20th Avenue S. to provide a watermain loop.
PROPOSED STREET DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION There will be public street connections to Nadeau Acres through the provided street stub and to 20th Avenue S (County Highway 54) that will include the necessary turn lane improvements as
required by Anoka County. Interior private drives (Drives A, B & C as noted on the Concept Plan)
will be constructed to serve a large majority of the proposed multi-unit townhomes. The annual average daily traffic (AADT) on 20th Avenue was determined to be 5,808 trips per day per the 2022 MNDOT Traffic Mapping Study. With the proposed Nelson / Rehbein
development, the additional ninety (90) lots at ten (10) trips per day will increase the annual
average daily traffic by approximately 900 trips per day. Below is a summary of the proposed roadway widths and linear footage:
Linear Footage:
Total Road Linear Length – Approximately 3,105 L.F
• Public Streets – Approximately 2,005 L.F
• Private Drives – Approximately 1,100 L.F
Proposed Right-of-Way (ROW): Internal ROW – 60’ feet Private Road – 24’ feet back-to-back Cul-de-sac ROW – 60’-foot min. radius STORMWATR MANAGEMENT: Most of the surface water from this proposed development will flow through new storm sewer infrastructure to sedimentation ponds. All ponding and water quality features will be designed per
current city and watershed regulations. Stormwater will be designed to minimize site runoff rates to the extent feasible. The City of Lino Lakes will assume ownership of the stormwater quality pond, and structures within those ponds/basins at full buildout.
WETLAND DELINATION:
A wetland report was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on October 19, 2021, for
the two (2) Rehbein parcels. Kjolhaug is currently updating the Wetland Delineation Report to include the Nelson parcel. The design of the Nelson Rehbein development revolves around wetland preservation for future homeowners to enjoy the natural wildlife habitat and features of these wetlands. While the applicant is proposing to preserve significant wetlands, they are also
proposing to impact some of the existing wetlands. The final impacts will be determined by
Kjolhaug this spring to submit for consideration, feedback and approval by the necessary governing bodies. PARKS:
Park land dedication for a future park is not proposed. Park dedication requirements shall be paid
as a fee. MONUMENT & MAILBOXES: The develop will have an entrance monument that will be maintained by the Homeowner
Association. The location and design are pending. Cluster mailboxes will be provided for all (90)
lots. TIMING/PHASING/STAGING
Per Lino Lakes 2040 utility staging plan, this area is planned to have utilities between 2018-2025.
We plan to commence with development in the Fall 2025 that will align within the projected service date. The site is planned to be built within one (1) phase of grading and one (1) phase of street & utilities.
HOUSING:
The Nelson Rehbein development will have a total of (90) homes. The zoning from the R-2 and Planned Unit Development will allow the homes to be divided into two (2) different housing types and styles that will satisfy different segments of homebuyers. Selection of builders for the two (2) proposed product types is currently pending.
HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATIONS & ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES Homeowner Associations will be established to maintain the common open spaces, neighborhood monument, mailboxes etc. The townhome units will provide exterior maintenance for the units
and grounds along with maintaining the private streets. The Homeowner Associations will be
responsible for enforcement of the rules, regulations, and architectural guidelines of the neighborhood, this will provide for a neighborhood that is cohesive and well maintained. CONCLUSION
Twin Cities Land Holding, LLC is proud to present this proposal and feel that the proposed concept plan meets the goals of Lino Lakes. We look forward to working with the City of Lino Lakes to create a successful new residential development. We respectfully seek approval of the Concept
Plan to allow the Nelson Rehbein development to proceed with the preliminary plat and rezoning submissions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
293031
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3940
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
64
65
66
67
68
69
707172737475
76
77
78
79
80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
61 62
63
13
14
15
16
17
18
25
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
of
REVISIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
l
a
y
o
u
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
l
a
y
o
u
t
3
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
03
/
2
1
/
2
5
FILE NO:XXX
2
1
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
W
T
L
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
RED
O
A
K
L
A
N
E
WEST CEDAR STREET
STREE
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
B
DRV
A
D
R
V
B
CO
N
C
E
P
T
P
L
A
N
C#
03/21/2025
POND
POND
FLOOD
P
L
A
I
N
M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
NOTES LEGEND
DR
V
C
1.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
SITE DATA
VICINITY MAP
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
.
(
C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
Attachment 2. Concept Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
293031
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3940
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
64
65
66
67
68
69
707172737475
76
77
78
79
80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
61 62
63
13
14
15
16
17
18
25
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
of
CO
N
C
E
P
T
P
L
A
N
W/
A
E
R
I
A
L
REVISIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
C#
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
l
a
y
o
u
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
l
a
y
o
u
t
3
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
03
/
2
1
/
2
5
FILE NO:XXX
2
2
LEGEND
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
.
(
C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
WEST CEDAR STREET
STREE
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
B
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
RED
O
A
K
L
A
N
E
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
POND
POND
FLOOD
P
L
A
I
N
M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
D
R
V
B
DR
V
C
DRV
A
03/21/2025
W
T
L
D
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
NOTES
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SITE DATA
WETLAND
WETLAND
WET
L
A
N
D
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WETLAND
WET
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
293031
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
3940
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
64
65
66
67
68
69
707172737475
76
77
78
79
80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
61 62
63
13
14
15
16
17
18
25
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
O
W
E
R
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
RE
D
O
A
K
L
N
.
POND
POND
FLOOD
P
L
A
I
N
M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
RED
O
A
K
L
N
.
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
A
V
E
.
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
.
(
C
S
A
H
5
4
)
STREE
T
B
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
PR
I
V
A
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
PRIVATE STREET
NE
T
A
R
E
A
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
1
1
NON-DEVELOPABLE LAND
DENSITY CALCULATIONS
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
REVISIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
JJO
03/21/2025
FILE NO:XXX
of
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
N
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
_
n
e
t
a
r
e
a
p
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
0
2
/
2
5
#0000
VICINITY MAP
Attachment 3. Net Area Exhibit
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
of
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
N
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
_
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
1
0
/
2
5
#0000
3
R1
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
REVISIONS
1. 4/10/2025 Add trees, vegetation & pics.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
JJO
03/21/2025
FILE NO:XXX
VICINITY MAP
Attachment 4. Resource inventory
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
WI
T
H
A
E
R
I
A
L
I
M
A
G
E
R
Y
of
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
N
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
_
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
1
0
/
2
5
#0000
3
R2
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
REVISIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
JJO
03/21/2025
FILE NO:XXX
VICINITY MAP
1. 4/10/2025 Add trees, vegetation & pics.
of
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
N
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
_
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
1
0
/
2
5
#0000
3
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
WI
T
H
A
E
R
I
A
L
I
M
A
G
E
R
Y
R3
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
REVISIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
JJO
03/21/2025
FILE NO:XXX
1. 4/10/2025 Add trees, vegetation & pics.
OUTLOT C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
2627282930
3132333435
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4950
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
60
61
62
13
14
15
16
17
18
25
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
97
96
95
94
93
103
102
101
100
99
98
104
105
106
107
108
109
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
of
REVISIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
l
a
y
o
u
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
l
a
y
o
u
t
3
y
i
e
l
d
p
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
0
3
/
2
5
FILE NO:XXX
2
1
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
W
T
L
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
RED
O
A
K
L
A
N
E
WEST CEDAR STREET
STREE
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
B
CO
N
C
E
P
T
Y
I
E
L
D
P
L
A
N
C#
03/21/2025
POND
FLOOD
P
L
A
I
N
M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
NOTES
1. 04/03/2025 City comments.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
POND
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
.
(
C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
SITE DATA
WETLA
N
D
WETLA
N
D
WTLD
Attachment 5. Yield Plan
OUTLOT C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
2627282930
3132333435
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4950
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
60
61
62
13
14
15
16
17
18
25
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT A
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
97
96
95
94
93
103
102
101
100
99
98
104
105
106
107
108
109
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
COMMON LOT
R E V
I
E
W
C
O
P
Y
of
CO
N
C
E
P
T
Y
I
E
L
D
P
L
A
N
W/
A
E
R
I
A
L
TW
I
N
C
I
T
I
E
S
L
A
N
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
48
0
0
O
l
s
o
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
H
w
y
-
#
1
0
0
Go
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
2
REVISIONS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DRAWN BY:
ISSUE DATE:
C#
f:
\
j
o
b
s
\
1
1
3
4
1
-
1
1
3
5
0
\
1
1
3
4
3
-
r
e
h
b
e
i
n
n
e
l
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
\
c
a
d
c
3
d
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
l
a
y
o
u
t
s
\
1
1
3
4
3
l
a
y
o
u
t
3
y
i
e
l
d
p
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
Sa
v
e
D
a
t
e
:
04
/
0
3
/
2
5
FILE NO:XXX
2
2
LEGEND
NOTES
WETLA
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
WE
T
L
A
N
D
WETLAN
D
WETLAN
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
WT
L
D
WEST CEDAR STREET
STREE
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
B
HE
R
I
T
A
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
RED
O
A
K
L
A
N
E
NE
L
S
O
N
/
R
E
H
B
E
I
N
P
A
R
C
E
L
S
Li
n
o
L
a
k
e
s
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
POND
POND
FLOOD
P
L
A
I
N
M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
03/21/2025
W
T
L
D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
20
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
.
(
C
.
S
.
A
.
H
.
N
O
.
5
4
)
SITE DATA
1. 04/03/2025 City comments.
WETLAN
D
WETLA
N
D
WTLD
17
8
E
9
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
|
SU
I
T
E
2
0
0
| SA
I
N
T
P
A
U
L
,
M
N
|
55
1
0
1
|
65
1
.
2
8
6
.
8
4
5
0
|
WS
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner
From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer
Date: May 7, 2025
Re: Nelson-Rehbein Parcels Concept Plan Review 028815-000
WSB’s review of the Concept Plans for the Nelson-Rehbein development in Lino Lakes, MN,
prepared by Carlson Engineering and received April 14, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents:
•Nelson-Rehbein Parcels - Concept Plan Submittal prepared by Carlson Engineering,dated March 21, 2025.
The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant.
Engineering
•General
Nelson-Rehbein development includes approximately 25 acres west of 20th Avenue (CSAH 54), between Red Oak Lane and West Cedar Street. The current conceptual project proposes 38 single family lots and 52 Townhome lots (90 lots total) and associated infrastructure.
•Grading
The Nelson-Rehbein development includes site grading for the 90 lots/units as well as
extensions of Heritage Avenue, and one other local public street with three private streets
that are yet to be named.
•Stormwater Management
The combined properties, 24.55 acres, primarily surface flow north through an onsite
wooded swale or by direct runoff to the west. Runoff drains to a pond/wetland complex to the north, continuing to flow north via Judicial Ditch 3 into Peltier Lake. There are some additional flows coming from the south via the wooded swale.
The concept plan shows stormwater management features in limited detail. The applicant
will be required to meet City of Lino Lakes’ stormwater rules in addition to Rice Creek
Watershed District requirements.
Attachment 6. City Engineer Memo dated May 7, 2025
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 2
Nelson-Rehbein Parcels Concept Plan Submittal - Engineering Review
Stormwater reuse will be required for all development irrigation.
• Water Supply
The City’s water supply system well firm capacity is currently constrained by poor water
quality in some wells, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors.
Based on the water supply capacity and well trigger analysis completed in April 2024, the
city may need additional well(s) to accommodate development within the City’s existing
2040 Utility Staging Area. While the City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies the need for additional wells to support continued growth, the White Bear Lake District Court orders and ongoing litigation, currently prevents the City from implementing that plan.
The City is currently working through the well approval process with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR). This action does not contemplate capacity for areas outside the current Utility Staging area. Without additional well capacity proposed developments may be deemed premature. The developments will be evaluated on a case by case basis to determine actual demand and availability of capacity to serve the development. Any proposed development will need to demonstrate methods reduce water use including but not limited to stormwater reuse for irrigation. Applicant to verify water pressure is adequate for all locations within the development. All proposed units are required to be on the municipal water supply.
Water infrastructure for the Nelson-Rehbein development has not yet been designed and
will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. There is an existing 16-inch
diameter trunk watermain along 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) that will be looped through the site to an existing 8” diameter watermain within Heritage Avenue. Otherwise, the development will include a water system with predominately 8- inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot. Water supply will need to be evaluated in conjunction with current pending DNR water appropriation approvals. Additional water stubs may need to be extended to the north or west for future development.
The development is in the City’s Drinking Water Study Management Area and has moderate vulnerability and would be subject to those requirements.
• Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer collection for the Nelson-Rehbein development has not yet been proposed
and will need to be submitted for preliminary plat by the applicant. It is anticipated that the
existing 8-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sanitary sewer within Heritage Avenue will be
extended north to serve the site. The site will be served along with 4-inch Schedule 40
PVC service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the
south.
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 3
Nelson-Rehbein Parcels Concept Plan Submittal - Engineering Review
• Transportation
A general street layout has been proposed with the Concept Plan. The City of Lino Lakes’
Comprehensive Plan requires neighborhood street connections. The Nelson-Rehbein property is adjacent to 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) which is A-Minor Arterial Reliever,
Heritage Avenue and an unnamed street are local roads with three private roads. The applicant is showing connections with the right of way to Heritage Avenue in the south
portion of the development and 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) in the east portion. A traffic study will be required for the site.
Trails and sidewalks
Additional trails and sidewalks will be required along the interior and connector roads as
directed by the City Planner.
Comments
1. The traffic study shall include the intersections of Street A and 20th Avenue, 21st Avenue and Cedar Street, Birch Street and 20th Avenue and 20th Avenue at the
proposed site intersection. The analysis should address the intersection geometrics (i.e. turn lanes) and traffic control needed to accommodate the proposed site development. 2. The traffic study shall meet the requirements outlined in City ordinances. The ten-
year forecast review should be 2040 3. The applicant will need to receive approval from Anoka County for the site access
to Street A. It is anticipated that they will require right-in and right-out access with a median at the intersection as well as a southbound right turn lane.
4. The applicant will need to receive approval from Anoka County for emergency access from private Driveway A onto CSAH 54.
• Wetlands and Environment
The site includes 2.84 acres of wetland and buffer. An approved wetland delineation will be
required. The applicant will need to work with RCWD for Wetland Conservation Act
regulations.
The project indicates that there are approximately 2.2 acres of wetland. A wetland
replacement plan based on the impacts will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved
through RCWD and the City.
The applicant should verify with the DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System database
for the potential presence of protected species within and near the project area, including
protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for
additional studies or surveys as necessary.
• Landscaping
A Landscape Plan for the Nelson-Rehbein development has not yet been submitted. One
will need to be submitted and reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments.
Ms. Katie Larsen 05/07/2025 Page 4
Nelson-Rehbein Parcels Concept Plan Submittal - Engineering Review
• Floodplain
The site includes ~5% Zone A Floodplain. A Base Flood Elevation will need to be
determined and approved by FEMA. A LOMR will be required, and floodplain
mitigation will be required as applicable. This mitigation already appears to be
considered in Outlot C in the southwest corner of the site. However, greater detail
is needed to check mitigation quantities.
• Drainage and Utility Easements
Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features. The
western 60’ feet of CSAH 54 should be dedicated as right of way to Anoka County as well
as an additional trail easement.
Conservation easements will be required over wetlands. Standard side yard drainage and utility easements and easements over public utilities will be required.
• Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat.
• Grading Agreement
Grading agreement not required at this time.
• Stormwater Maintenance Agreement
The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Nelson-Rehbein development will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. • Permits Required
Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential permits may include some of the following and others:
1. NPDES General Construction Permit
2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Construction
3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit 6. Anoka County Right-of-Way Permit 7. FEMA LOMR
If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris
Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651)
982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us.
To: Katie Larsen, City Planner
From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator
Date: April 30, 2025
Re: Environmental Comments – Nelson Rehbein PUD Concept Plan
The Environmental Board recommended the following at their April 30, 2025 meeting:
1.Provide a geotechnical report of the site with soils borings to confirm soils and
types of bmp’s that will be feasible onsite.
2.Complete wetland delineation for the site should be submitted.
a.Include proposed impacts and mitigation requirements.
3.Rare plant, animal, and significant resource inventory should be completed for
the site.
a.Staff used the USFWS IPac tool to determine federally protected species
for the site. A final evaluation of species is required by the developer.
4.Stormwater management to be reviewed by City Engineer
a.Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated
and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater
ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse.
b.Infiltration is required to be shown where feasible based on soil borings.
If infiltration is not feasible follow the Minimum impact design standards
(MIDS)) as designed by the MPCA
5.Provide a tree inventory for the site showing significant trees and show proposed
tree removals.
a.Tree removals should be shown in the basic use area along with any ESA
areas.
6.City Tree Protection Fence detail should be added to the plan sheet. Standard
detail Gen-27
Environmental Memo
Attachment 7. Environmental Coordinator Memo dated April 30, 2025
Page 2
7. Trees scheduled to be preserved must have Tree Protection Fence installed in
accordance with City tree protection fence detail.
8. Ash trees preserved will not provide any existing tree credit. All ash trees should
be removed unless they are noted and will continue to be treated for EAB on
two-year rotations
9. Seed mixes should be updated to MNDOT seed mix design numbers for final
plans. Please provide more site-specific mixes for each location.
10. Low maintenance turf should be evaluated throughout development. Ground
covers should be drought resistant to reduce the need for irrigation use.
11. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an
NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction.
a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the
MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26
b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future
submittals
12. Tree removal should be completed in the fall or winter to minimize impacts to
migrating or nesting bat populations
13. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan, surmountable curb is provided to
allow turtles access off the roads.
From:Logan Keehr
To:Katie Larsen
Subject:RE: Submittal for Nelson Rehbein Property
Date:Thursday, May 1, 2025 9:56:12 AM
Attachments:image001.jpg
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Katie,
We would want 60 feet of ROW as well as a trail easement along CSAH 54.
According to the CSAH 54 corridor study, the Street A access will be required to be a right
in/right out access. We would want a SB right turn lane constructed as part of this
development.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Logan Keehr, PE
Traffic Engineer II
Anoka County Transportation Division
Highway-Transit-Fleet-Surveyor-GIS
1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
www.anokacountymn.gov
Office: 763-324-3100
Direct: 763-324-3183
Fax: 763-324-3020
Our passion is your safe way home!
From: Marissa Ertel <MErtel@linolakes.us>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 11:01 AM
To: Logan Keehr <Logan.Keehr@anokacountymn.gov>; pchaffey@isd12.org; mgrossklaus@isd12.org
Cc: Katie Larsen <KLarsen@linolakes.us>
Subject: Submittal for Nelson Rehbein Property
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This message originated from outside the Anoka County
email system. Use Caution when clicking hyperlinks, downloading pictures or
opening attachments.
Attachment 8. Anoka County Comments dated May 1, 2025
Hello –
Please see the attached submittal for Nelson Rehein Property.
Please return comments to Katie Larsen by Wednesday, May 7, 2025.
Thank you,
Marissa Ertel
Administrative Assistant
600 Town Center Pkwy
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Direct 651-982-2422 Fax 651-982-2499
mertel@linolakes.us
NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka Countygovernment offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/ormay be disclosed to third parties.
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 7
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
WORK SESSION DATE: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Water & Sewer JPA with White Bear Township/City of North Oaks
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
As previously discussed, the Wilkinson Waters development, located in the northwest quadrant
of Centerville Road and County Road J is proposed to be served by White Bear Township
utilities. Staff has been working with both the Township and the City of North Oaks on a joint
powers agreement (JPA) to secure access to these utilities.
The project is in Lino Lakes Sanitary Sewer District 4, which is planned to serve the Southeast
Quadrant of the City, generally east of Holly Drive and South of Holly Drive East & Birch Street.
The area will be served by an 18” trunk sanitary line that runs along Centerville Road in White
Bear Township. The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies the need to enter into a JPA with
White Bear Township to acquire capacity from this line.
Water is proposed to be temporarily provided by White Bear Township through water mains
installed in the City of North Oaks. The Wilkinson Waters project has water main stubbed to
the property along with lateral water mains running through the property serving the Rapp
Farm development on the west side of Wilkenson Lake. White Bear Township currently has
agreements in place with North Oaks Development Company for water supply. Staff is
anticipating a minimum service timeline of 10 years. Ultimately the property is planned to be
serviced by Lino Lakes utilities once extended.
A draft agreement has been prepared based on existing agreements between North Oaks and
White Bear Township. Staff is working through the agreement components to address sanitary
sewer flow, billing responsibilities, rates and metering locations. Wate rates for the project
may be different than rates charged for the balance of the City. White Bear Township charges
North Oaks a base rate equal to 125% of their tier 1 residential water rates. This would result
in a base water rate of $3.25 per thousand gallons. For comparison Lino Lakes current tier 1
rate is $2.19 per thousand. We are anticipating a similar fee as part of our JPA.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
2
None required. Update only.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Sanitary Sewer Service Area Map
2. Proposed Water Service Area
8-27
Figure 8-5: Full Build Out Trunk Sanitary Sewer System
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
""
"
"""""
"
"
"""""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""""
"
"
""""""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
""""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"""
"
"
""""
""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""""
"""""
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"""""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""""""
"""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"""
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""
""""
""""""
"
"
"
"
"
"""""
"""
""
"
""""
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""""""""""""
"""""
""
"
"
"
"
"""
""
"
"""
"""
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
Xä
!(
!(
!(
!(
BaldwinLake
RondeauLake
Bald
EagleLake
WilkinsonLake
Otter Lake
AmeliaLake
Reshanau LakeRice Lake
CentervilleLake
Marshan Lake
George
WatchLake
Peltier Lake
Cedar Lake
LilacSt
20th Ave S
456721
456749
456721
456749
456714
456754
456723
456714
456754
456754
456714456714
20th
Ave
20th Ave
§¨¦35E
§¨¦35W
2J
2I
2A
2C
2B
2E
2G
2H
2F
1H
1A
1C
1B
1G
1D
1E 4D
4C
4A
4B
3E
3D
3C
3B
3A
5C
5A
5B
3G
3F
4E
2D
1F
2K
3H
")53
")153
")140
")84
")84
MainSt
Main
St
Main St
M 210
M 211
M 219
M 220CedarSt
Hodgson
Rd
Lake Dr
Elm St
Birch St
Birch St
Lake
Dr
Sunset
Ave
Rondeau
Lake Dr E
Ash St
Oak Ln
Apollo Dr
62nd St N
Ash St
Rondeau
Lake Rd W
Centerville Rd
Holly Dr
4th Ave
Holly Dr E
Birch St
80th St E
LS12
LS8
LS69
LS6
LS4
LS7
LS5
LS2
LS9
LS53
LS1
LS11
LS10
LS3
64th St
White Bear Township
City of Blaine
City of Circle Pines
City of Columbus
City of Hugo
City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´
Figure 8-5Full Build Trunk
Legend
City of Centerville
Xä Lift Station
""Forcemain
Xä Future Lift Station
""Future Forcemain
!(MCES Meter
Xä MCES Lift Station
""MCES Forcemain
""MCES Gravity Main
Future Trunk Sewer
""8"
""10"
""12"
""15"
""18"
""21"
""30"
Existing Trunk Sewer
"""8"
"""10"
"""12"
"""15"
"""18"
"""21"
"""24"
Not in Ultimate Service Area
Sanitary Sub-District
Open Water
Right-of-Way
Municipal Boundary
Parcels
Streams
3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/8/201811/9/2020
CrescentLn
Leaf Wing Dr
1
32
21
59
81
Legend
Sewer Manholes
Lift Station
Plug
Active
Sewer Gravity Mains
Water Hydrants
Water System Valves
Water Type
Potable Water
Parcels
City Mask August 28, 2024±
Map Powered By Datafi
1 in = 500 Ft
Proposed WBT Service Area
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 8
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
WORK SESSION DATE: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Public Works Building, Construction Manager Update
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
Following discussion at the March 3, 2025, work session staff proceeded with soliciting
proposals from qualified firms to provide Construction Management as agent (CMa) services for
the proposed Public Works Building. The CMa scope of services would include:
Pre-construction activities: these include consulting on aspects of project design with the City
and Oertel Architects, creating parameters for quality, cost and time, constructability reviews
and cost analysis and management of the overall project budget. This would also include
development of a phasing and sequencing plan.
Procurement activities: these would include developing a procurement plan include multiple
bid packages, along with bid and award administration.
Construction Phase: these activities would include coordination of all subcontractors, vendors
and suppliers, prepare project schedule, lead change order review and dispute resolution in
coordination with staff and Oertel Architects, enforcing and maintaining quality of control
standards and review of contractor labor, materials and other costs.
Closeout: Management and coordination of final start-up, testing and occupancy, facilitate
commissioning process and compile all project documentation.
Four firms where selected for consideration and interviewed by City staff. The firms included:
ICS
Knutson Construction
Kraus-Anderson
RJM Construction
2
Each of the firms were highly qualified and experienced in providing construction services. Staff
review included multiple factors including experience, experience specific to municipal public
works projects, experience working with our selected architects, costs and strategies for
expediting project schedule. Each of the firms were asked to provide a cost proposal based on
an estimated construction cost of $14,500,000 and an 18-month project schedule. Proposals
ranged from $1,042,171 to $1,502,854. For professional service agreements the City is not
required to award the lowest bid price.
Based on the information received through the proposals and interview process staff is
recommending selection of RJM Construction. RJM had the second lowest proposal cost,
strong background in public works building construction, and a very qualified team proposed
for the Lino Lakes project.
Staff is working with RJM and the City Attorney to negotiate the project fee. The fee includes
multiple components include a fixed CM fee, Construction Phase Site Services based on hourly
rates and monthly reimbursables based on unit costs. RJM is working with us to establish a not
to exceed project fee based on a specified project cost and construction timeline.
Additional detail on the fee structure will be provided at the work session.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
Staff will be requesting direction to consider award of the CMa contract to RJM at the June 9,
2025, City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. RJM Proposal excerpt
830 Boone Avenue North
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 952-837-8600 RJMConstruction.com
April 18, 2025
Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes
City of Lino Lakes | 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014
RE: CMA Services for Lino Lakes Public Works Building
Dear Michael-
Thank you for considering RJM Construction for the Lino Lakes Public Works Building project. We are excited about
the opportunity to collaborate with your team and the architect to bring your vision to life for the entire Lino Lakes
community.
We are confident that we can exceed the project team’s goals based on our extensive experience and proven track
record:
MUNICIPAL CM EXPERTS
RJM has had the privilege of partnering with over 50 municipalities on construction management projects. Our
services extend beyond construction. From managing purchases through your state contract to guiding city staff
through council approvals, RJM is your reliable partner.
PUBLIC WORKS EXPERTISE
RJM is a trusted construction partner for municipalities on numerous public works facility projects. Our diverse
experience includes multiple projects with similar features and programs. We leverage this experience to establish
accurate budgets, provide appropriate cost-saving options, and guide the team in making informed decisions.
COLLABORATION AND CREATIVITY
We understand the pressure on city staff to deliver a long-lasting, quality facility while meeting budget requirements
set by the city council and constituents. Creativity and collaboration are critical to a successful outcome. RJM has
extensive relevant experience with Oertel Architects, and together, we will immediately bring value and solutions to
the team. We work transparently with the entire project team to identify cost savings and innovative solutions.
RJM’s team is prepared to engage immediately. We appreciate this opportunity and look forward to the next steps. If
you have any questions, please contact me at 952-837-8614.
Sincerely,
Brad Barickman | Vice President Community | 952-837-8614 | brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 3
deliver
driven to
Our expertise ensures
every step of your project
vision is achieved.
COVER LETTER
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
STAFF QUALIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT APPROACH
COST PROPOSAL
AIA DOCUMENT A305
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXHIBITS
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 4
RAMSEY PUBLIC WORKS
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA
PROJECT INFO
PROJECT TYPE
MUNICIPAL
SQUARE FEET
93,000
ARCHITECT
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
Andrew Cooper
CLIENT
CITY OF RAMSEY
Grant Riemer
FINAL CONTRACT
$17,300,000
DATE OF COMPLETION
NOVEMBER 2021
RJM worked with the City of Ramsey to build a new
93,000-square-foot public works facility which was completed on
budget and ahead of schedule.
We welcomed this opportunity to offer our Construction
Management Agency (CMa) services to the team at the City of
Ramsey to replace the outdated existing facility.
The new, efficient space was created to serve the community, city
staff, vehicles, and equipment. The building includes a storage area
for the city’s vehicle fleet, a fleet maintenance shop, offices for
public works employees, and a community space.
MEP components relating to power, compressed air, and water
connections are all especially critical to the operation of this type
of facility. Our project team worked closely with all subcontractors
to ensure the work met the design vision and owner expectations.
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 5
ANDOVER PUBLIC WORKS
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
RJM Construction was selected by the City of Andover to serve as
the construction manager of its public works expansion project,
focused on modernizing facilities and improving operational
capabilities. The project included the construction of three
essential structures: a 21,889 square-foot fleet maintenance
building to facilitate vehicle servicing and enhance safety,
an 18,424 square-foot cold storage facility for safeguarding
equipment, and a canopy-covered fuel island designed for efficient
refueling operations. Additional upgrades to the site encompassed
landscaping, infrastructure improvements, and the addition of
a modest Veterans Memorial Plaza honoring the service and
sacrifices of veterans
This expansion has strengthened the city’s ability to maintain and
protect essential equipment while providing a safer and more
functional environment for maintenance personnel.
PROJECT INFO
PROJECT TYPE
MUNICIPAL
SQUARE FEET
40,812
ARCHITECT
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
Andrew Cooper
CLIENT
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dave Berkowitz
FINAL CONTRACT
$10,499,552
DATE OF COMPLETION
JUNE 2020
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 6
ELK RIVER PUBLIC WORKS
ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA
RJM Construction served as the construction manager for the City
of Elk River for its new, state-of-the-art public works facility. This
project was designed to enhance the city’s operational capabilities
and provide modern, functional spaces for vehicle maintenance,
equipment storage, and administrative activities.
The facility includes extensive indoor vehicle storage space,
ensuring that fleet vehicles are protected from the elements and
readily accessible for use. A multi-bay vehicle maintenance area
was constructed, equipped with advanced features such as vehicle
lifts, an overhead crane, lube reels, and air compression hoses,
all designed to streamline maintenance operations and improve
efficiency. Additionally, the facility features administrative offices
and a lunchroom, offering comfortable and practical spaces for staff
to conduct their daily activities and take breaks.
Externally, the site was further developed to support the facility’s
operations and create a more user-friendly environment. Outdoor
break areas were added to enhance employee well-being, providing
spaces for relaxation and recreation. A new salt shed store structure
was also constructed, offering secure, dedicated storage for road
salt and ensuring the city’s readiness for winter road maintenance.
PROJECT INFO
PROJECT TYPE
MUNICIPAL
SQUARE FEET
83,958
ARCHITECT
JLG ARCHITECTS
Tom Betti
CLIENT
CITY OF ELK RIVER
Cal Portner
FINAL CONTRACT
$8,746,330
DATE OF COMPLETION
NOVEMBER 2011
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 7
XCEL ENERGY SIOUX FALLS
SERVICE CENTER
SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
The Xcel Energy Sioux Falls service center project involves a
comprehensive overhaul of an existing warehouse facility alongside
the expansion of fleet bays to meet increasing operational demands.
In the warehouse remodel phase, efforts will focus on optimizing
storage and operational efficiency, converting the old warehouse
into contemporary office space for staff, and modernizing
infrastructure to improve workplace functionality. The fleet bay
expansions will involve constructing a precast addition tailored
to meet fleet service requirements. This addition will feature
specialized bays equipped for vehicle cleaning and maintenance,
expedited vehicle servicing and repairs, and dedicated facilities for
welding operations to support fleet maintenance.
PROJECT INFO
PROJECT TYPE
INDUSTRIAL
SQUARE FEET
55,310
FINAL CONTRACT
$21,060,870
DATE OF COMPLETION
DECEMBER 2024
ARCHITECT
TKDA
Craig Coil
CLIENT
XCEL ENERGY
John Gunter
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 8
XCEL ENERGY GRAND
FORKS SERVICE CENTER
GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA
The multi-phased Xcel Energy Grand Forks Service Center project
encompasses two primary components: a 10,000-square-foot
pre-engineered metal building dedicated to vehicle storage and a
30,000-square-foot service center integrating various amenities
to enhance operational efficiency and customer service. Within
the vehicle storage building, a fully equipped weld shop and paint
booth will provide essential services for vehicle maintenance and
customization. The service center will include new office space for
administrative staff, along with additional warehouse and vehicle
storage areas to streamline inventory management and logistics.
Additionally, dedicated fleet bays equipped with advanced tools will
facilitate efficient servicing of fleet vehicles. To maintain vehicles
to the highest standards, the facility will feature a wash bay and a
Quick Lane Bay for expedited servicing.
PROJECT INFO
PROJECT TYPE
INDUSTRIAL
SQUARE FEET
40,000
ARCHITECT
TKDA
Craig Coil
CLIENT
XCEL ENERGY
John Gunter
FINAL CONTRACT
$19,848,762
DATE OF COMPLETION
SEPTEMBER 2025
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 9
PROJECT CMa CMr
Andover Public Works | 2019Andover, MN X
Apple Valley Central Maintenance Facility | 2025Apple Valley, MN X
Blaine City Hall and Police Department Improvements | 2021Blaine, MN X
Carver County Lake Waconia Waterfront Service Center | 2022Cologne, MN X
Chanhassen Public Works | 2010Chanhassen, MN X
Chaska Public Safety Facility | 2025Chaska, MN X
Elk River Municipal Utilities Field Services Facility | 2021Elk River, MN X
Elk River Public Works | 2013Elk River, MN X
HERO Center | 2019Cottage Grove, MN X
Lakeville Regional Public Safety Training Facility | 2025Lakeville, MN
Medina Public Works and Police Department | 2013Medina, MN X
Montevideo Public Works | 2021Montevideo, MN X
North Metro Range - Regional Training Facility | 2019Maple Grove, MN X
Plymouth Fire Station #2 & #3 | 2022Plymouth, MN X
Ramsey Public Works | 2021Ramsey, MN X
Rogers Police Station | 2015Rogers, MN X
Watertown Public Works and City Hall | 2027Watertown, SD X
Woodbury Public Works | 2019Woodbury, MN X
Wright County Sheriff’s Office Training Center | 2020Maple Lake, MN X
Xcel Energy Grand Forks Service Center | 2025Grand Forks, North Dakota X
Xcel Energy Sioux Falls Service Center | 2024Sioux Falls, South Dakota X
PUBLIC SERVICE
PROJECT EXPERTISE
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 10
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
PROVEN PARTNER FOR EXCEPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
RJM Construction is proud to bring industry-leading expertise, proven
methodologies, and a client-focused approach to support municipalities in achieving
their construction goals. With decades of experience and a track record of successful
collaborations with over 50 municipalities, we are uniquely positioned to deliver
results tailored to the needs of your community.
EXTENSIVE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE
RJM specializes in delivering comprehensive, collaborative construction management
solutions. Our team works closely with municipal staff throughout the City Council
process, ensuring all actions are meticulously scheduled, supporting documentation
is accurate and thorough, and stakeholders remain fully informed. This proactive
engagement fosters transparency, enhances communication, and ensures the
successful delivery of your projects. Additionally, our expertise in drafting detailed
bid packages and employing innovative strategies allows us to overcome challenges
efficiently, aligning every project with your vision and goals.
LEADERSHIP IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
As pioneers of the Construction Management at Risk (CM at Risk) delivery model,
RJM introduced this innovative approach with the City of Eden Prairie in 2007. We
have since executed it successfully across a variety of public, private, and non-profit
projects. Our extensive experience facilitates a seamless process, minimizing learning
curves and delivering effective project execution.
COMPREHENSIVE SUPPORT BEYOND CONSTRUCTION
RJM’s services extend beyond traditional construction management. We offer expert
guidance in managing purchases through state contracts and navigating council
approvals, ensuring every aspect of the project is managed efficiently. Our experience
with public works projects—many in collaboration with Oertel Architects—enables
us to establish accurate budgets, provide tailored cost-saving recommendations, and
support teams in making informed decisions that benefit the community.
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 11
Firm Qualifications
A HANDS-ON BUILDERS-FIRST APPROACH
RJM prides itself on being more than just project managers—we are builders first. This
perspective allows us to address design and construction challenges with innovative
and practical solutions, resulting in significant cost savings for our clients. Our deep
integration within the subcontracting community ensures access to a qualified pool
of subcontractors, leading to competitive pricing and enhanced project outcomes.
With RJM, you gain a partner committed to delivering excellence at every stage of
the project.
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY EXPERTS
RJM specializes in municipal public works facilities and have been working on these
facilities for 20 consecutive years. Our team has an in-depth understanding of the
operational intricacies of these facilities, including equipment needs, workflow
efficiencies, and seasonal demands. This expertise allows us to deliver on spaces that
enhance functionality and support staff needs throughout your operation.
WHY RJM CONSTRUCTION?
RJM combines industry expertise, innovative solutions, and a client-centric philosophy
to deliver projects aligned with your vision and goals. Our dedication to transparency,
collaboration, and excellence makes us the ideal partner for municipalities seeking to
enhance their communities through successful project outcomes.
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 12
PRECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
BRAD BARICKMAN
PROJECT PRINCIPAL
KEY
Construction
Preconstruction
CURTIS SELLBRIAN POGALZ
PROJECT EXECUTIVECHIEF ESTIMATOR
CHRIS LIEDMAN
MEP DIRECTOR
KALE FISCHER
SAFETY DIRECTOR
MIKE JOHNSON
DIRECTOR OF
QUALITY CONTROL
AARON CHAPPUIS
PROJECT MANAGER
JOHN MCKENZIE
SUPERINTENDENT
PROJECT TEAM
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 13
BRAD BARICKMAN
PROJECT PRINCIPAL
952-837-8614 brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com
Brad has been in the construction industry for more than 20 years. With
his diverse background, he brings multiple perspectives to the project
team, ensuring that we meet and exceed client goals. Brad draws heavily
on experience to anticipate project needs and will delegate the proper
resources to complete the requirements efficiently. From complex
community ground-up facilities and renovation projects, to healthcare and
corporate work, his proven dedication to budget control, value analysis,
construction sequencing, and disruption avoidance is always evident in the
quality of the finished product.
As the Vice President of Community, Brad exemplifies leadership, providing
strategic direction and management within the respective market sector.
He bears ultimate responsibility for establishing profitable projects and
upholding a superior level of client satisfaction.
While Brad’s highly motivated and task-oriented approach sets a standard
for everyone on the team, he is also focused on creating and maintaining
long-term relationships with clients, understanding their needs and
challenges, and helping them make their project vision come to life.
ROLE DESCRIPTION
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
REFERENCES
PROJECT LOCATION
Andover Public Works Expansion Andover, MN
Ramsey Public Works Ramsey, MN
Woodbury Public Works Woodbury, MN
Elk River Public Works Elk River, MN
Montevideo Public Works Montevideo, MN
North Metro Range Training Facility Maple Grove, MN
Watertown Public Works & City Hall Watertown, SD
Plymouth Fire Stations 2 and 3 Plymouth, MN
HERO Center Cottage Grove, MN
Wright County Tactical Training Center Buffalo, MN
Chief of Police Eric Werner
City of Maple Grove
763-494-6101
Mr. Matt Podhradsky
City of Chaska
952-448-9200
Mr. Dave Callister
City of Plymouth
763-509-5301
Mr. Tom Betti
JLG Architects
651-767-3773
Mr. Andrew Cooper
Oertel Architects
651-696-5186
Mr. Todd LaVold
Leo A. Daly
612-359-4656
AWARDS
EDUCATION
LEED AP
Bachelor of Science
Construction Engineering
Iowa State University
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 14
CURTIS SELL
PROJECT EXECUTIVE
952-837-8685 curtis.sell@rjmconstruction.com
ROLE DESCRIPTION
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
REFERENCES
PROJECT LOCATION
Ramsey Public Works Ramsey, MN
Andover Public Works Expansion Andover, MN
Woodbury Public Works Woodbury, MN
Xcel Energy Sioux Falls Service Center Sioux Falls, SD
Xcel Energy Grand Forks Service Center Grand Forks, ND
Andover Community Center Expansion Andover, MN
Paradise Commons Waconia, MN
Ferrari Twin Cities Performance Center Golden Valley, MN
Audi Minneapolis Golden Valley, MN
Ms. Teresa Keller
City of Woodbury
651-714-3500
Mr. Dave Berkowitz
City of Andover
763-767-5133
Mr. Grant Riemer
City of Ramsey
763-433-9863
Mr. Andrew Cooper
Oertel Architects
651-696-5186
Ms. Stacy Collins
Mohagen Hansen
952-426-7429
Mr. Denton Mack
Sperides Reiners Architects
952-996-9662
TRAINING & CERTS
EDUCATION
Erosion and Stormwater
Management Certification/
Site Management
University of Minnesota
OSHA 30
Bachelor of Science
Construction Management
Minnesota State
University - Mankato
Curtis began his construction career with RJM as an intern while attending
Minnesota State University - Mankato. Upon graduation, he was hired full-
time as a project engineer and has been promoted numerous times leading
him to his current role as project executive.
Curtis has proven that collaboration with team members is the key to
project success and he always puts the client first. Passionate and driven,
Curtis strives to provide a seamless construction process and make the
project an enjoyable experience for all team members, from conception to
completion.
Key Responsibilities:
-Plan project workflow including schedule, materials, and workforce
-Assist estimating team during preconstruction including final bidding
-Recommend course of action based on client needs and requirements
-Proactively reassess project scope based on new information and analysis
-Closely monitor schedule, budget, and quality to ensure project vision is
achieved
-Work with superintendent and consultants to drive efficiencies
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 15
AARON CHAPPUIS
PROJECT MANAGER
651-894-2970 aaron.chappuis@rjmconstruction.com
ROLE DESCRIPTION
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
REFERENCES
PROJECT LOCATION
Southwest Christian High School Fieldhouse Addition Chaska, MN
Xcel Energy Service Center Sioux Falls, SD
Xcel Energy Service Center Grand Forks, ND
Animal Emergency and Referral Center Oakdale, MN
Municipal Building Commission City Office Improvements Phase 1 Minneapolis, MN
Municipal Building Commission City Office Improvements Phase 2 Minneapolis, MN
Mr. Dan Beckering
Southwest Christian High School
612-360-9893
Mr. John Gunter
Xcel Energy
763-807-2969
Ms. Karen Reynhout
Animal Emergency &
Referral Center
651-501-3759 ext. 3007
Mr. Josh Felix
BGW Architects
435-720-2394
Mr. Craig Coil
TKDA
763-234-8741
Mr. Steve Iaria
KOMA
651-295-8466
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science
Construction Management
Minnesota State
University, Mankato
Aaron brings valuable expertise to the RJM team with his well-rounded
history varying in size and complexity. Aaron has proven that collaboration
with team members is the key to project success and he always puts the
client’s needs and concerns first. Passionate and driven, Aaron strives to
provide a seamless construction process and make the project an enjoyable
experience, from conception to completion, for all team members.
Key Responsibilities:
-Plan project workflow including schedule, materials, and workforce
-Assist estimating team during preconstruction including final bidding
-Proactively reassess project scope based on new information and analysis
-Closely monitor schedule, budget, and quality to ensure project vision is
achieved
-Work with superintendent and consultants to drive efficiencies
-Recommend course of action based on client needs and requirements
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 16
ROLE DESCRIPTION
John started his career working in commercial construction in 1999. He has
held roles as apprentice, journeyman, carpenter foreman, and currently,
superintendent. John has demonstrated a solid ability to coordinate
multiple subcontractors on projects with intense scheduling requirements.
John’s experience working within functioning facilities with restricted site
conditions has prepared him to provide pro-active field leadership under
the most demanding requirements.
Key Responsibilities:
-Direct all field personnel and manage subcontractor activities
-Ensure that quality control standards and safety protocols are upheld at
all times
-Maintain construction schedule and proactively identify and resolve any
disruptions
-Order materials, schedule inspections as necessary
-Maintain regular communications and positive relationships with clients,
contractors, vendors, and team members
-Maintain an efficient, organized, safe, and clean job site
JOHN MCKENZIE
SUPERINTENDENT
952-240-3088 john.mckenzie@rjmconstruction.com
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
REFERENCES
PROJECT LOCATION
Ramsey Public Works Ramsey, MN
Apple Valley Police Department Apple Valley, MN
North Metro Range Regional Public
Training Facility Maple Grove, MN
Lakeville Regional Public Safety
Training Facility Lakeville, MN
Wright County Sheriff’s Office Training Center Maple Lake, MN
Woodbury City Council Chambers Woodbury, MN
Minnesota Wild Training Facility St. Paul, MN
League of Minnesota Cities Remodel St. Paul, MN
Mr. Don Olson
City of Hopkins
952-548-6392
Mr. Mike Marson
League of Minnesota Cities
651-215-4015
Chief of Police Eric Werner
City of Maple Grove
763-494-6500
Mr. Erik Olson
JLG Architects
612-767-3773
Mr. Aaron Fields
BWBR
651-262-6929
TRAINING & CERTS
OSHA 10, OSHA 30
SWPPP
EDUCATION
Carpenters Union
Training Center
Carpentry
Century College
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 17
BRIAN POGALZ
CHIEF ESTIMATOR
651-238-2938 brian.pogalz@rjmconstruction.com
Brian brings over 25 years of valuable industry experience to the RJM team,
with a dedicated focus in preconstruction services over the last decade. In
his role as Chief Estimator, Brian oversees preconstruction and estimating,
ensuring the incorporation of unique project details. He directs the team
to develop accurate budgets from schematic design to final construction,
achieving optimal value for clients in educational, community, corporate,
and healthcare markets.
His dedication to budget control, value analysis, and client relationships is
evident in the high-quality finished products. Brian’s mission is to challenge
the status quo and focus towards creative solutions that incorporate value
and quality into each project built.
ROLE DESCRIPTION
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
REFERENCES
PROJECT LOCATION
Chaska Public Safety Facility Chaska, MN
Lakeville Regional Public Safety
Training Facility Lakeville, MN
Apple Valley Police Department Apple Valley, MN
North Loop Minneapolis Bus Garage Minneapolis, MN
East Side Storage and Maintenance Facility Minneapolis, MN
Grand Forks Air Force Base Fire Station Grand Forks, ND
Restoration Professionals Warehouse/
Vehicle Storage & Office Facility St. Paul, MN
Ramsey County Managers Office St. Paul, MN
Dakota County SMART Center Inver Grove Heights, MN
Maple Grove Community Center Expansion Maple Grove, MN
Runestone Community Center Alexandria, MN
Bloomington Ice Garden Bloomington, MN
Northfield Ice Arena Northfield, MN
Mr. Adam Neumann
Bigos Management
763-234-0526
Mr. Alex Polinski
Altus Development
612-919-0505
Mr. Burt Coffin
ESG
612-310-7707
Mr. Ward Issacson
Pope Architects
651-642-9200
Ms. Melanie Baumhover
BWBR
651-290-1988
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture
& Bachelor of Science,
Environmental Design
North Dakota State University
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 18
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT APPROACH
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
RJM Construction recognizes the vital role of the Construction Manager as both
an advocate and a steward of the City of Lino Lakes interests throughout the
construction process. Leveraging our deep expertise and proven methodologies, we
bring unparalleled focus and leadership to ensure the success of municipal projects.
While the City of Lino Lakes may engage in construction projects periodically,
managing such initiatives is at the core of RJM’s daily operations. Our seasoned team
is committed to alleviating the demands placed on City staff, allowing them to focus
on their essential responsibilities while we manage the complexities of the project.
Our approach is proactive and highly collaborative, guiding the team through
every phase of design and construction with precision and efficiency. We foster
strong partnerships with the City and its stakeholders, prioritizing transparent
communication and alignment with your vision. RJM is dedicated to delivering not
only a successful project outcome but also a streamlined and positive experience for
all involved, from inception to completion.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk management is a crucial aspect to consider whether you are in the midst of a
construction project or managing day-to-day business operations. At RJM, we
prioritize project risk management through proactive planning and meticulous
attention to key areas. Our approach is designed to ensure that all clients receive the
highest level of service, with a focus on the following:
-Subcontractor prequalification: We maintain a broad base of quality
subcontractors and vendors and conduct a thorough review of their qualifications
and resources. We select subcontractors based on an equitable combination of
price, qualifications, and resources to ensure the success of your project.
-Quality: Building a project that stays true to your vision requires excellent quality
control. We execute a formal review process of materials and installation details,
using virtual design and MEP systems expertise to identify and address issues
before they become problems.
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 19
RJM
Construction
was able to
deliver the
project on time
and within
budget. Their
staff has also
been responsive
to issues and
adjustments that
need to be made
after we moved
into the new
facility.
- Scott Johnson
City of Medina
Construction Management Approach
-Safety: At RJM, safety is one of our top priorities. We believe that safety, quality,
and productivity are all interconnected. That’s why we have a comprehensive
program to ensure that we prioritize safety on every project.
-Insurance: We understand that unforeseen challenges can arise during any
project. That’s why we maintain a combination of insurance policies tailored to
the needs of both the construction industry and our clients.
-Ongoing service and maintenance: Our service team provides routine service,
preventative maintenance, and everything in between to ensure that your
building or space remains in top condition. This proactive approach to the health
and quality of your environment helps minimize unforeseen challenges and
safeguards your long-term investment.
QUALITY CONTROL
For the Lino Lakes Public Works Facility Project, RJM will develop a custom quality
control plan. We rigorously monitor the quality of materials and installation
procedures starting from the design phase. To enhance quality assurance, we
recommend a third-party review for critical components.
Our team includes a dedicated Director of Quality Control, who focuses on reviewing
the project’s critical details and conducting pre-installation conferences with
contractors to set quality expectations and best practices. During these meetings, we
review approved submittals, analyze systems, and discuss critical work sequencing.
These proactive sessions effectively mitigate issues before they arise, ensuring
smooth project progression.
RJM’s comprehensive quality control process includes daily checklists and stringent
contractor selection criteria, ensuring successful project delivery that meets or
exceeds client expectations. Led by our Director of Quality Control, Mike Johnson, our
team ensures meticulous oversight of project details and adherence to specifications.
Pre-installation conferences are pivotal, providing a platform to align expectations
with contractors. We review approved submittals, assess mock-up systems, and
meticulously plan work sequencing to preempt potential issues, ensuring seamless
project execution.
We implement comprehensive planning systems and regular executive check-ins to
drive project success. This meticulous planning begins in the preconstruction phase,
focusing on site logistics, defining work scopes, procuring long-lead materials, and
collaborating closely with clients on Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FFE) and
move schedules.
Throughout construction, we conduct detailed schedule reviews and task validations
to maintain alignment with project requirements. Our systematic approach
emphasizes robust document control, ensuring all design and construction documents
are current, accurate, and accessible to all stakeholders.
We believe that our comprehensive quality control process, which includes pre-
installation conferences, daily checklists, and stringent contractor selection criteria,
is essential to delivering a successful project that meets or exceeds our client’s
expectations.
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 20
SAFETY PROGRAM
Safety is integral to our business. We believe that safety, quality, and productivity
are interrelated, and we have adopted a comprehensive program to carry out that
philosophy. Our policy is to provide required safety training for all employees, utilize
high-performing safety equipment, and set clear expectations and standards for
subcontractors. RJM’s Director of Safety, Kale Fischer, provides leadership and
oversight to the safety aspects of every project and will work closely with our project
team to develop a site security plan that complies with all temporary egress, fire, and
life safety requirements. Our safety manual is segmented and accessible through
QR codes posted on-site, providing instant access to information in the field. This
approach ensures that the content is readily available at all times and allows for
real-time updates and improvements to our processes. Directives accompanying
our toolbox talks are modified to communicate these changes promptly, fostering a
dynamic and responsive safety communication system within our organization.
The following set of metrics provides a comprehensive overview of our unwavering
commitment to safety and our outstanding track record over the past seven years.
These metrics encapsulate the array of safety protocols and measures we have
implemented and upheld, guaranteeing the safety and well-being of our employees,
customers, and stakeholders. They stand as a testament to our dedication to fostering
a safe and secure environment across all our operations and processes.
RJM has earned recognition from esteemed bodies such as the Minnesota Department
of Labor and Industry and the AGC of Minnesota as a Construction Health and
Safety Excellence (CHASE) partner. The CHASE partnership charter underscores the
significance of creating a safe, healthful work environment in construction and seeks
to foster a relationship built on mutual trust and respect among all parties involved in
the construction process, including project owners and construction workers. Since
2015, RJM has been an active participant in the CHASE program, with our inaugural
Level 3 project, the HERO Center, completed in 2018. Presently, we are engaged in
our eighth CHASE project.
Our enduring partnership with the Associated General Contractors (AGC) and
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is deeply valued. It
has empowered us to continuously enhance and embed safety standards into our
company culture while aiding us in mitigating risks to our employees, subcontractors,
and visitors.
CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES
RJM takes a proactive and diligent approach to managing change orders, prioritizing
the client’s interests and project efficiency. Every change order request undergoes
a thorough review before it is presented to the client. Our team works closely with
subcontractors in the field to explore options for resolution, often mitigating or
completely eliminating the need for the proposed change. By focusing on alternative
solutions and leveraging proactive project management, we minimize disruptions and
maintain project momentum.
Construction Management Approach
RJM EMR
.87
.74 .70
RECENT SAFETY
RECOGNITION &
AWARDS
LECET Safety Driven
Contractor Award
of Excellence: 2022,
2023, 2024
AGC CHASE Level 3
Projects: 2022, 2023,
2024. RJM has been
a CHASE member
since 2015, and have
had at least 10 Level
3 projects in the last 3
years
OSHA Stand Down to
Falls: Recognition in
2022, 2023, 2024
Governors Bronze
Safety Award: 2024
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 21
When changes are unavoidable, RJM collaborates with the project team to evaluate
the impact, both financially and operationally, while developing strategies to address
the issue effectively. In the event the City requests project enhancements, we engage
with the project team to clarify the nature of the requested changes. We provide
expert guidance on the most cost-effective methods to implement these adjustments,
ensuring that the work aligns with the overall project goals and budget considerations.
Our systematic and solutions-oriented approach not only minimizes unnecessary
changes but also fosters clear communication among all stakeholders, promoting
smooth project progression and alignment with the client’s vision. By taking
ownership of the change order process, RJM ensures that any necessary modifications
are handled professionally, efficiently, and with the client’s best interests in mind.
PROCESS FOR MANAGING FINAL STARTUP, TESTING, AND OCCUPANCY
RJM follows a structured and meticulous approach to manage the coordination of final
startup, testing, and occupancy. At substantial completion, following comprehensive
operations and maintenance training conducted with the design team, contractors,
and suppliers, operational responsibility for the facility is transferred to the client.
Throughout this transition, RJM ensures that all punch-list items are completed
efficiently, warranty information is assembled, and contractual contractor closeout
documents are promptly collected.
Before conducting the official punch list with the project team, RJM performs
a pre-punch list internally to identify, record, and address any outstanding items.
This proactive measure ensures a streamlined process during the final stages.
Additionally, RJM and the client’s project team conduct a post-occupancy inspection
approximately 11 months after completion to address any long-term concerns.
The commissioning process, supported by RJM’s internal MEP (Mechanical,
Electrical, Plumbing) Director, concludes with the preparation of a comprehensive
final commissioning report. This report includes issue logs, open items, and final
testing results. Any commissioning activities delayed due to climatic conditions
or equipment availability are addressed in the post-occupancy phase. The MEP
Director’s involvement facilitates seamless coordination with trade partners and
ensures that all systems are functioning optimally by final completion.
Throughout the process, thorough training for facility staff is a priority. Formal
training sessions empower operations and maintenance personnel to understand
and manage all equipment and systems effectively, ensuring the facility operates in
alignment with its design capabilities. Both building operational staff and end users
receive specialized training tailored to the installed equipment and systems.
To prepare for final occupancy, RJM reviews a detailed final occupancy checklist
with the client several months in advance. This checklist verifies that inspections
and training have been completed, temporary conditions have been reverted to
permanent installations, required documentation is in place, and all building services
have been transferred to the client’s name. This comprehensive process allows for a
smooth transition, providing the client with a fully operational and functional facility
ready to meet their needs.
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 22
ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES
At the core of RJM’s preconstruction team are six full-time estimators. This team
ensures estimates are accurate and completed on time without the daily distractions
of project management. Our team has an extensive database, comprehensive
procedures, and the experience to produce accurate and timely estimates.
RJM’s estimating team utilizes various technological resources to develop a cost
model. Materials are quantified with precision in eTakeoff/Dimension and paired
with our unit cost database, which is maintained via Sage Estimating. We also rely on
virtual building models (BIM) to ensure estimating accuracy.
RJM’s cost estimating process is entirely open book. We provide detailed information
supporting our numbers in an open forum with the project team. An estimate
summary will highlight the major categories of work and associated costs. In addition,
RJM provides a detailed estimate, showing all cost categories by the specification
section. These resources will allow the team to make educated decisions. As the
design progresses, we provide continuous, real-time cost evaluation so that we
immediately realize the cost impact to design choices. Being proactive in this process
saves critical time and cost, helping Oertel understand budget impacts before designs
are complete.
CONCEPTUAL PHASE:
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE:
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE:
This estimate is completed by reviewing the general project scope and utilizing gross
square footage estimates. Key elements such as soil corrections, utilities, and unique
features are accounted for as well as the more standard features of the project.
At the start, SD estimates are applied to more detailed square footages. At this point,
we are beginning to lock in on the overall layout of the building and can start to develop
costs based on the desired finish. By the completion of this phase, the estimate will be
supported with actual quantities of construction systems. This analysis will save design
team resources and allow you to look at multiple scenarios for structure, enclosure,
interiors, etc.
As the estimate moves through this phase, unit quantities will be available to produce
a very detailed estimate. The project’s budget will develop its final details at the end
of this phase. This estimate will be fully supported by subcontractor feedback to gain
valuable market insight.
RJM’S DESIGN PROCESS KEY STEPS:
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 23
The RJM Difference
Our team provides a final estimate at 95% completion of the design.
This is different from other construction managers. The intent of
this final estimate is to confirm the 95% drawings and specifications
align with the budget and that we have 100% subcontractor
support to prove it. This final confirmation allows us to accurately
track the expected final bid amounts when received. Allowing one
last opportunity to make slight adjustments to the plans prior to
bidding assures the project will be delivered on budget.
BIDDING PROCESS
RJM will facilitate bid receipts and conduct the public opening process. Before
issuing documents for bid, RJM will work with the City of Lino Lakes staff and the
Oertel design team to create comprehensive packages for each scope of work. The
bid packages identify any potential gray areas and ensure complete bids are received
and all contractors are bidding the same project. Specific and unique details are
highlighted, and all specific job requirements are outlined for the trades. Our process
has proven to:
-Increase the number of bids received
-Create a competitive environment
-Reduce the submission of incomplete bids and legal expenses incurred
-Reduce the number of change orders received
RJM thoroughly reviews each bid for completeness, clarifes any potential
discrepancies, and conducts a scope review with all apparent low-bid contractors.
The team is presented with recommendations and a comprehensive project budget.
After the contractor awards are approved, RJM prepares and processes the
appropriate contracts. All contracts over $175,000 are required to provide a
performance and payment bond. Quotes received under that amount only come from
a select list of reputable, qualified, cost-competitive contractors.
BEST VALUE – VALUE ADD OPTION
In 2007, the Minnesota Legislature enacted a law that enables public agencies to
select contractors based on best value instead of solely low bid. Best-value contracting
is a procurement process encompassing several factors besides price while awarding
and executing construction contracts. Best-value procurement considers factors
such as qualifications, schedule, quality, and performance-based criteria to evaluate
and select the most suitable contractor.
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 24
This method is beneficial when a project has unique objectives or challenges that
may be difficult to meet through traditional low-bid procurement. RJM recommends
that our clients consider best value for specific trades for such projects. This system
is advantageous as it requires less decision-making, prepares for the future, and
minimizes risk. Even if risks occur, they can be effectively controlled or managed. RJM
has Best Value Certified staff who can discuss the benefits of this approach with city
staff. RJM is currently utilizing this approach with the City of Maple Grove on their
Community Center expansion and have had great success thus far. With the contract
requirements for HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, and electrical to be design-build,
the best value procurement method is RJM’s recommended approach for these four
categories.
SOURCEWELL PROCUREMENT – VALUE ADD OPTION
Another flexible option for the City is direct purchasing items through state contract
and the Sourcewell program. RJM is an approved Sourcewell contractor and can assist
the City with any direct purchase items, such as scoreboards and other furnishings.
Benefits of Sourcewell direct procurement are fixed unit cost (cost savings to City)
and schedule reduction (expedited contracting process).
PRICE PER S.F. FROM RECENT/COMPARABLE PROJECTS.
City of Woodbury Public Works | 2018 - $310/SF
City of Montevideo | 2020 - $220/SF
City of Andover | 2021 - $340/SF
City of Ramsey | 2022 - $250/SF
PROJECT STAGING TO MINIMIZE OPERATIONAL DISRUPTIONS
DISRUPTION AVOIDANCE/SITE LOGISTICS
Careful consideration will be given to minimizing disruptions and ensuring the safety
and convenience of residents and pedestrians. Construction disruption avoidance
strategies aim to mitigate the impact of demolition activities on the surrounding
community and public pathways. RJM understands the existing Public Works facility
is being removed. RJM’s first step in this process will be to gain an understanding
and provide input for Public Works operations during construction. We have recent
examples with the City of Chaska and relocation of their entire fire station during
construction of their new facility. We also have recent experience of maintaining
partial operations and removing the existing building in segments to make way for
their new facility with the City of Plymouth Fire Department.
One key aspect of construction disruption avoidance is thorough planning and
coordination with local authorities and stakeholders. Before construction begins,
RJM will develop a detailed plan with the City that outlines the specific steps to
minimize disruptions. This plan may include measures such as scheduling construction
activities during off-peak hours to reduce noise and inconvenience to residents,
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 25
Our experience
in understanding
the submittal
timeline and
historical cost
information
on sustainable
building
products and
systems will
add value and
ensure the
project remains
on schedule
from design to
closeout.
providing advance notice to nearby residents and businesses about the construction
schedule, and establishing clear signage and barriers to redirect pedestrian traffic
away from the demolition site and ensure their safety. RJM will hold regularly
scheduled disruption avoidance coordination meetings to review any upcoming
changes that will impact the facility. The City can then utilize this documentation to
communicate with staff and the public proactively.
Additionally, efforts should be made to minimize dust, debris, and other potential
hazards generated during site grading/demolition. This may involve implementing
dust control measures such as spraying water on the site to reduce airborne dust,
using barriers or screens to contain debris, and regularly cleaning up debris to prevent
it from spilling onto public pathways.
Furthermore, proactive communication with the community is essential to address
any concerns or issues that may arise during the construction process. This may
involve setting up a dedicated hotline or email address for residents to report any
disruptions or safety concerns, as well as holding regular meetings or open houses to
update the community on the progress of the demolition and address any questions
or feedback they may have.
MAINTAINING PROJECT BUDGET
STRATEGIC BUDGETING AND SCHEDULING WITH RISK
MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE
On all projects listed, RJM collaborated with project stakeholders from the outset
to establish a comprehensive budget and create a schedule tailored to planned city
operations and the availability of construction materials. This early engagement
enables a seamless alignment of project goals while addressing logistical complexities
to ensure efficient progress.
RJM employs a proven process that incorporates interim checkpoints at each risk
reduction milestone. These checkpoints provide an opportunity to thoroughly
assess the project’s alignment with the established schedule and budget, fostering
transparency and proactive management throughout the project lifecycle. In the
event of potential delays or unforeseen issues, these milestones play a critical role in
identifying challenges early and enabling the development of recovery plans. These
plans are designed to mitigate impacts, maintain project continuity, and uphold key
project parameters without exceeding predefined limits.
This structured approach reflects RJM’s commitment to delivering projects that
prioritize precision, adaptability, and the needs of our stakeholders, ensuring
successful outcomes in even the most dynamic environments.
ENHANCING PROJECT SUCCESS WITH STRATEGIC OPTIONS FOR
THE CITY COUNCIL
The most successful projects are those where our team provides the City Council
with a comprehensive range of options at key decision points. This begins during
the design phase, where the Oertel team works to optimize program and design
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 26
elements, challenging the project budget while prioritizing functionality and vision.
With the expertise of an experienced public works construction team, the project can
be delivered within budget by presenting strategic options to the stakeholder team.
These options may include clear timelines for accepting alternates, incorporating
specific allowances within the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), or staging areas
of completion (e.g., shell, finish, complete). For example, after the design is finalized,
alternate material selections or scope revisions can be considered on bid day when
bids have been reviewed. If the bids are favorable to the overall budget, items such as
long-term enhancements can be incorporated back into the project. Conversely, if bids
exceed the budget, non-critical elements can be eliminated. This approach provides
the City Council with the flexibility to adapt to market conditions while maintaining
project goals—a crucial strategy in today’s dynamic economic environment.
MITIGATING RISK WITH EARLY PROCUREMENT STRATEGIES
RJM is committed to safeguarding the City Council’s interests by minimizing risk
throughout the construction process. As part of our proactive planning, we develop
strategies to procure long-lead materials prior to final bidding. For example, items
such as structural steel or precast wall panels can be secured early through a limited
financial commitment covering engineering and shop drawings. This approach
ensures production slots are reserved without requiring the City to purchase the
materials upfront.
By implementing early procurement, the project benefits in two significant ways: it
reduces the risk of delays caused by material availability and mitigates the impact
of inflation on critical resources. These measures allow the project to progress
efficiently while maintaining cost control, ensuring timely delivery and alignment
with the City’s overarching objectives.
VALUE ENGINEERING
Value engineering is an essential process during design. We prioritize value
engineering to enhance project efficiency without compromising quality. By
scrutinizing construction plans and methodologies, we identify opportunities for
cost savings and performance improvements while maintaining project integrity.
RJM’s job is to provide the team with cost-saving ideas available for the team’s review
and subsequent implementation. Drawing from similar project experience, our team
understands how to reduce costs without sacrificing the building’s function or design
intent. RJM believes that the most effective way to increase value is to look for it at
every design stage. RJM reviews multiple systems related to foundations, structures,
enclosures, roofs, and mechanical and electrical to ensure the most effective
installation and the utilization of materials that will last.
Historically, our value engineering process has
saved 9-13% in value between schematic design and
construction documents.
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 27
CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEWS
RJM leverages its extensive experience, collaborative approach, and commitment
to excellence to provide exceptional constructability reviews. We are dedicated
to contributing to the success of our clients’ construction projects by identifying
opportunities for improvement, mitigating risks, and optimizing the overall
construction process. RJM’s constructability reviews are continuous during
design. We emphasize early-stage intervention to identify potential challenges and
opportunities during the design phase. This proactive approach ensures that potential
issues are addressed before they escalate, resulting in cost savings and streamlined
project timelines. RJM’s Director of Quality Control also closely reviews design
documents at each phase. After this careful review process, RJM may suggest minor
design modifications to Oertel. As an added element of quality risk management, RJM
recommends a third-party plan/details review for all critical building components,
such as waterproofing, roofing, and building envelope systems.
SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT
As an early adopter of lean construction principles, RJM incorporates details gained
through recent market experience, constructability reviews, subcontractor-provided
information regarding critical timelines and material lead times, and critical path
milestones to establish a preliminary construction schedule. RJM then conducts
pull-planning sessions with the complete subcontractor base to ensure these
resources align with the project expectations. These sessions allow us to validate
sequencing, evaluate potential efficiency gains, and establish commitments to
activity durations and crew sizes to produce a master schedule to meet or improve
our initial schedule goals. Once construction begins, we can offer productivity
assessments and variance reports to monitor workforce needs, ultimately protecting
the project schedule. RJM supports the entire project team by establishing a
comprehensive schedule considering all critical milestones - beginning with
project development and culminating with an 11-month warranty walk-through.
This commitment to all project stakeholders ensures realistic expectations within
efficient work sequences. RJM’s assigned project manager will review all contracts
for scheduling needs and critical timelines. They will identify long lead-time items
and critical path milestones, ensure all are in alignment, and then prepare and issue
master schedules. Once construction begins, they will offer analysis and variance
reports. At RJM, we incorporate efficient, lean construction principles into the project
approach to gain efficiencies and monitor workforce needs, ultimately protecting the
project schedule.
EXPEDITING WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS AND MATERIAL SUPPLIERS
Maintaining strong and positive relationships with the subcontractor market protects
the project’s integrity and keeps everyone working as a team. RJM has been proud
to receive the Minnesota Subcontractors Association TOPS Award (Teamwork,
Opportunities, and Partnering with Subcontractors) for several years, emphasizing
our firm but fair approach. By valuing and maintaining that strong relationship, RJM
can solicit quality partners to bid projects and push the envelope regarding delivery
dates or expedited project schedules.
Construction Management Approach
City of Lino Lakes RFP - Public Works Building 28
SITE SAFETY- COMMITMENT TO SAFETY ON EVERY PROJECT
At RJM, maintaining a safe working environment is our top priority across all projects.
We are committed to safeguarding the health and well-being of everyone involved
by adhering to the highest safety standards and protocols. Our superintendents
diligently oversee daily operations to verify strict compliance with safety procedures
among all contractors, ensuring the maintenance of an impeccable safety record free
from violations. This unwavering focus on safety is integral to our company culture
and operations.
For this project, RJM will implement a secured site program designed to restrict
employee access from active construction areas and protect individuals unfamiliar
with construction hazards from potential risks. Within the construction site, RJM
enforces comprehensive OSHA requirements, including personal protective
equipment (PPE), Lock-out/Tag-out procedures, and temporary fire and life-safety
measures. RJM does not permit any work on live electrical systems, and all hot work—
such as welding, brazing, or any activities involving flammable materials—must be
coordinated with building management and covered by hot work permits prior to
commencement.
Safety assessments are a continuous process throughout construction. The RJM
superintendent performs daily site evaluations to identify and address potential
risks, while the project manager conducts weekly assessments to ensure consistency
and compliance. This dual-layered approach underscores RJM’s commitment to
maintaining the highest level of safety and security for all personnel on-site.
By proactively addressing safety concerns, implementing stringent protocols,
and fostering a culture of accountability, RJM Construction delivers projects
that prioritize safety at every step, ensuring peace of mind for our clients and all
stakeholders.
Construction Management Approach
1
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 9
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
WORK SESSION DATE: June 2, 2025
TOPIC: Vadnais Lakes Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO)
JPA Amendments/Update
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
The Vadnais Lakes Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO), which covers a portion
of southeastern Lino Lakes is working to update its Joint Powers Agreement in conjunction with
its work to develop the 2027 – 2036 Watershed Plan. VLAWMO is a water management
organization that is responsible for an approximately 24.2 square mile watershed that
encompasses the City of North Oaks, and portions of the Cities of White Bear Lake, Gem Lake,
Vadnais Heights, Lino Lakes, and White Bear Township. VLAWMO operates under a Joint
Powers Agreement (JPA) between the communities. The current agreement will expire next
year and VLAWMO staff and attorney have undertaken a review to update the document and
better align it with operations.
City staff and City attorney, Jay Squires, have completed an initial review of the proposal and
provided a few comments back to VLAWMO staff. These include the following for
consideration:
• Section 3.14: The City recommends that capital improvement projects continue to
require a super majority (2/3) vote of all Directors.
• Section 6.3 Member Assessments: Please clarify the timing for adoption of proposed
member assessments. The City begins its annual budget process in late May and adopts
the preliminary level in September. The City will need time to incorporate into its
budget if proposed.
• Section 7.1 Duration of Agreement: The City recommends staying with the current 10-
year duration. With the modernization of the agreement future update efforts should
be minor. A review and discussion every 10 years would ensure that the document
stays up to date and current with changing staff/councils.
• 6.1(e) SSU Charge Certification: Should the reference to County Auditor reference the
respective County Auditor since we have both Anoka and Ramsey Counties involved in
this process?
2
The VLAWMO board will be reviewing an updated draft in the coming months for
consideration.
REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION
None required. Update only.
ATTACHMENTS
1. VLAWMO Attorney Overview of Changes
2. Redline of draft agreement.
___________________________________________________
1250 Wayzata Blvd E, Unit #1065, Wayzata, MN 55391
MEMORANDUM
To: VLAWMO Board of Directors From: Troy Gilchrist, VLAWMO Attorney
Date: April 14, 2025 Re: Overview of Changes in the Updated Joint Powers Agreement
VLAWMO was originally established by a joint powers agreement (“JPA”) adopted by the member communities (“Members”) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103B.211 of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act (Minn. Stat. §§ 103B.201-103B.253). The Members last updated and readopted the JPA in 2016. I assisted with that update and my recollection was that the Board pursued relatively few updates at the time.
The current JPA is set to expire on December 31, 2026, and once again the agreement needs to be updated and readopted. The enclosed draft of the JPA reflects a more comprehensive update of the language to more closely align the text with how VLAWMO actually operates. Importantly, this draft more specifically addresses budgeting, funding, and projects in light of the storm sewer utility
authority. An effort was also made to streamline the language as much as possible. The following highlights the more substantive changes in the draft JPA: 1. Added recitals to provide context for the agreement (recitals – p. 1).
2. The definitions were expanded to include the storm sewer utility, capital improvement, and other terms (Sec. 2, p. 3-4). 3. The specific years each group of Board members are to serve was removed (Sec. III, p. 4).
4. It was made clear the secretary-treasurer can delegate duties of the position as currently occurs (Sec. 3.11(c), p. 5). 5. The voting requirements were revised to require a majority vote instead of a 2/3 vote to
approve capital improvement projects (Sec. 3.14, p. 6).
6. The storm water utility and the authorizing special legislation is called out and is recognized as the primary funding source for the organization (Sec. 4.6, p. 7).
7. The process for capital improvements was more specifically spelled out (Sec. 4.7, p. 7).
Troy Gilchrist, Attorney
(612) 234-7539
troy@townlawcenter.com
8. Expanded the language on the Technical Commission to further detail its role and authority
(Sec. V, p. 10-11).
9. The budgeting and funding processes were updated to reflect the current process and to make clear Member assessments are no longer used to fund VLAWMO’s operations. Member assessments, which is the primary source of funding the operations of most WMOs,
is still in the agreement as a possibility if it ever needs to be relied on to help fund
VLAWMO’s operation (Sec. 6.2 & 6.3, p. 12-13). 10. Revised the capital improvement language to reflect how projects are currently funded (Sec. 6.4, p. 13).
11. The agreement proposes a 20 year term rather than the previous 10 year term to reduce the time and costs associated with having to readopt the JPA (Sec. 7.1, p. 14). The JPA can be amended at any time in the future if needed (Sec. 8.4, p. 15).
12. The appeal and arbitration process was replaced with a dispute resolution process that
focuses on mediation as the primary method to seek resolution (Sec. 8.2, p. 15). 13. Various miscellaneous provisions were added to address basic statutory requirements (such as data practices and audit compliance) and other general agreement provisions (governing
law, etc.) (Sec. VIII, p. 15-16).
14. The two amendments adopted in 2019 are incorporated into the agreement (insurance and liability, Sec. 4.15, p. 8-9 & revenue bond authority, Sec. 6.9, p. 14)
I plan on attending the meeting at which the Board will discuss the proposed updated JPA and I will
be happy to answer any questions the Board may have at that time.
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
1
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
TO PROTECT AND MANAGE THE
VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATERSHED
THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of
the last date of execution, by and between the participating units of local government of the
Cities of Gem Lake, Lino Lakes, North Oaks, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake and the
Township of White Bear, hereafter referred to as “Members” and (individually asa “Member”,
agree to continue” and collectively the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization, as
a public agency.“Members”).
RECITALS
A. The Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (“VLAWMO”) was organized
in 1983 and is located in the northeast metro area within Ramsey and Anoka counties.
B. VLAWMO is responsible for an approximately 24.2 square mile watershed that
encompasses the City of North Oaks, along with portions of the Cities of White Bear Lake,
Gem Lake, Vadnais Heights, Lino Lakes, and White Bear Township and includes 17 lakes,
1 creek, and over 1000 wetlands as shown on the map maintained by VLAWMO.
C. Local government units in the metropolitan area are required by the Metropolitan Water
Management Program (Minn. Stat. §§ 103B.201 to 103B.255) (“Act”) to plan for and
manage surface water.
D. Under the Act, one of the options available to local government units to satisfy its
requirements is to adopt a joint powers agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59 to
establish a watershed management organization to jointly plan for and manage surface
water within a watershed.
E. The Members elected to exercise their authority under the Act to adopt a joint powers
agreement establishing the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization
(“VLAWMO”) to cooperatively manage and plan for the management of surface water
within the watershed.
F. The original joint powers agreement has been updated over time and the term of the current
joint powers agreement expires on December 31, 2026.
G. VLAWMO is funded in large part by storm sewer utility fees certified to the County
Auditor and imposed by the County on properties within the watershed as authorized by
special legislation adopted by the Minnesota Legislature in 2008 (2008 Minn. Laws Chap.
366, Art. 6, Sec. 47).
Formatted: Font: 12 pt
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Don't addspace between paragraphs of the same style
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
2
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
H. The Members previously acted pursuant to their authority to establish the “Vadnais Lake
Area Water Management Organization Board of Directors” (“Board”) and said Board is
hereby reaffirmed as the entity charged with the authority and responsibility to manage the
VLAWMO.
I. VLAWMO has also established a Technical Commission that performs a variety of
functions to assist with VLAWMO’s operations and assist with developing VLAWMO’s
annual budget.
J. The Board has previously acted to adopt a Watershed Management Plan for the watershed
and has regularly updated the Watershed Management Plan in accordance with Minn. Stat.
§ 103B.231, Minn. R., chap. 8410, and such other law as may apply.
K. The parties desire to enter into this Agreement to reaffirm VLAWMO and the Board in
furtherance of its efforts to continue working cooperatively to prepare and administer a
surface water management plan to manage surface water within the watershed in
accordance with the Act and Minn. R., chap. 8410.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties
mutually agree as follows:
SECTION I
ESTABLISHMENT AND GENERAL PURPOSE
1.1 The Reaffirming the Establishment. The Members hereby reaffirm and ratify the
establishment and continued operation of the “Vadnais Lake Area Water Management
Organization (VLAWMO), created” pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, is
dependent upon the sincere desire of each Member to work cooperatively to meet the
requirements of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management statute, Minnesota Statutes,
Section 103B.201 et seq. (and Chapter 103D - Watershed Law), hereafter collectively
referred to as the “Act”. and such other laws and rules as may apply.
It is the general purpose of the parties to this Agreement to establish an organization to:
1) Continue the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization;
2) Develop and amend a water management plan; and
3) Operate appropriate programs including those to:
a) protect, preserve and use natural surface water and groundwater storage and retention
systems;
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.5", Keep with next, Don't adjust space between
Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian textand numbers
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Keep withnext, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don'tadjust space between Asian text and numbers
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
3
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
b) minimize capital expenditures necessary to correct flooding and water quality
problems;
c) identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and
groundwater quality;
d) establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and
groundwater management;
e) prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems;
f) promote groundwater conservation and recharge; and
g) protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities and
secure other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and
groundwater, and be in accordance with the Act.
1.2 General Purpose. The general purpose of this Agreement is to continue VLAWMO and its
work on behalf of the Members to cooperatively adopt, administer, and update as needed
the Watershed Management Plan, and to carry out the purposes identified in Minn. Stat. §
103B.201 and the other provisions of the Act. The plan and programs shall operate within
the boundaries of VLAWMO as identified in the official map filed with the Minnesota
Board of Soil and Water Resources. The most current version of the official map defining
the boundaries of the Watershed is incorporated herein by reference. The boundaries of the
Watershed are subject to change utilizing the procedure set out in Minn. Stat. § 103B.225
as may be needed to better reflect the hydrological boundaries of the Area.
SECTION II
VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATERSHED
VLAWMO shall manage a watershed area in northern Ramsey County and southeastern Anoka
County shown on the map set forth on Appendix A.
SECTION III
DEFINITIONS
2.1 For purposes of this Agreement,Definitions. The definitions contained in Minn. Stat. §
103B.205 and Minn. R., part 8410.0020 are hereby adopted by reference, except that the
following terms shall have the meanings as definedgiven them in this section.
“Agreement” means this Section.
(a) “Agreement” – This Agreement developed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
SectionMinn. Stat. §§ 103B.211 & 471.59 reconstitutingand which reestablishes and
continues the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO)..
(b) “Alternate Commissioner” means the person appointed by a Member to serve as its
alternate to represent the Member on the Technical Commission in the absence or
disability of its appointed Commissioner.
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Centered
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Don't addspace between paragraphs of the same style
Formatted: French (France)
Formatted: Justified, Keep with next, Don't adjust space
between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space betweenAsian text and numbers
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
4
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
(c) “Alternate Director” means the person appointed by a Member to serve as its
alternate to represent the Member on the Board in the absence or disability of its
appointed Director.
(d) “Area” – Themeans the boundaries of the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed as set forth
on the map set forth on Appendix A and hereafter referred to as the “Area”.official
map incorporated herein by reference.
(e) “Board of Directors” or “Board” – Themeans the governing board of VLAWMO
consisting of one elected official from each of the Members which are parties to this
Agreement.
(f) “Capital Improvement” means a physical improvement that has an extended useful
life. A capital improvement is not directed toward maintenance of an in-place
system during its life expectancy. A study or a research project do not constitute a
capital improvement that must be included in the Watershed Management Plan.
(g) “Capital Improvement Program” – Anmeans an itemized program for at least a
five-year prospective period, and any amendments to it, subject to at least
biennial review, setting forth the schedule, timing, and details of specific
contemplated capital improvements by year, together with their estimated cost,
the need for each improvement, financial sources, and the financial effect that the
improvements will have on the local government unit or watershed management
organization.
“City Council or Town Board” – The governing body of a governmental unit which is a Member
to this Agreement.
“City Staff” – Persons hired by units of local government whether as an employee or an
independent contractor.
(h) “Commissioner” – Ameans a person appointed by each Member to the Technical
Commission.
“Comprehensive Plan” or “comprehensive plan” – The meaning given it in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 473.852, Subdivision 5.
(i) “Director” – Anmeans the elected official appointed by each Member as aits
representative toon the Board of Directors.
“Governmental Unit” – Any city, town, township, county, school district, or other political
subdivision or an “instrumentality of a governmental unit” as described in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 471.59, Subdivision 1.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indent at: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indent at: 0.69"
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indent at: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
5
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
“Local Government Unit” – Cities, counties and towns, not including school districts, as
described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.852, Subd. 7.
(j) “Governing Body” means the city council of a Member city or the town board of the
Member town.
(k) “Local Water Management Plan” - Aor “Plan” means a plan adopted by the each of
the membersMembers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, SectionMinn. Stat. §
103B.235 and Minn. R., part 8410.0160.
(l) “Member” – Each local governmental unitmeans each of the cities and the town that
is a partyare parties to this Agreement.
(m) “Special Legislation” means 2008 Minn. Laws Chap. 366, Art. 6, Sec. 47, which was
approved by the Members.
(n) “Storm Sewer Utility” or “SSU” means the public utility established by VLAWMO
pursuant to the Special Legislation. The Board establishes and certifies to the
County for collection within the Area a Storm Sewer Utility fee for the management
of surface water.
(o) “Technical Commission” – Aor “TEC” means the commission established herein
that is composed of a technically skilled personpersons, one appointed by each
Member.
(p) “Vadnais Lake Area Watershed” – Themeans the area contained within a line drawn
around the extremities of all terrain whose surface drainage is tributary to Vadnais
Lake or as described in Appendix Aas shown on the official watershed map
incorporated herein by reference.
(q) “VLAWMO” – The abbreviated name of the organization created by this
Agreement, the full name of which ismeans the “Vadnais Lake Area Water
Management Organization”.” that is reestablished and continued pursuant to this
Agreement.
(r) “Watershed Management Plan” - Ameans a plan adopted by VLAWMO pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, SectionMinn. Stat. § 103B.231.
SECTION III
SECTION IV
ORGANIZATION OF VLAWMO; RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEMBERS
3.1 Subdivision 1. Board of Directors. The governing body of the VLAWMO shall be itsthe
“Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization Board of Directors.” The Board of
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging:
0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging:
0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging:
0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Body Text Indent, Indent: Left: 0.44", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.44" + Indentat: 0.69"
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: French (France)
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Left
Formatted: List Paragraph, Justified, Indent: Left: 0",Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1,
2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
6
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Directors is comprised of a total of six (6) Directors. The parties hereby reaffirm the
establishment and continued operation of the Board of Directors, which shall carry out the
purposes and have the powers as provided in this Agreement.
Subdivision 2. Appointment of Directors. Each Member shall appoint one representative, who
must be an elected official, to the Board, and said representative shall be called a “Director”. to
serve as the Member’s Director on the Board. The appointment process shall follow Minnesota
Statutes, Sectioncomply with the requirements in Minn. Stat. § 103B.227, Subdivisions 1 and 2.
3.2 Subdivision 3. Term of Office. Each Director shall serve at the will and consent of the
Member making the appointmentsubds. 1 and for a three-year term of office as follows:2.
(a) TheAppointment of Alternate Directors appointed by. Each Member shall appoint one
representative to serve as the Cities of Lino Lakes and White Bear Lake andMember’s
Alternate Director on the Township of White Bear shall be appointed for three-year
terms,Board. A Member’s Alternate Director may attend the beginning date of which
was January 1, 2013 and every three years there after.
(b) The Directors appointed by meetings of the Cities of North Oaks, Gem Lake and Vadnais
HeightsBoard, but shall be appointed for a term of three years,only be allowed to vote on
any matters before the beginning date of which is January 1, 2014 and every three years
there after.
3.3 The term of office of each Director shall commence fromBoard in the date of their
appointment and will continue until their successors are selected. A Directors appointed to
fill a vacancy shall serve out absence of the remainder of the term of thesame Member’s
Director the person succeeded.
3.4 Subdivision 4. Eligibility to Serve. Each Member shall determine the eligibility or
qualification standards for its Director appointment. Eligible appointees must beand
Alternate Director appointments. Only current elected officials and compliant with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.227, which, among other things, provides that local
unitson the governing body of government staff may notthe Member are eligible to serve as
a Director.Member or Alternate Member.
3.5 Subdivision 5. RecordTerms of Appointment. Each governmental unitOffice. Directors
and Alternate Directors serve three-year terms of office, which shall, within thirty (30) days
following commence from the date of their appointment of and will continue until their
successors are selected. Members shall notify the VLAWMO Administrator of its
appointments.
3.6 Removal. Directors and Alternate Directors shall serve at the will and consent of the
Members that appointed them. If a Member removes a Director or Successor Director, file
aAlternate Director, it shall provide VLAWMO written notice within 10 days of the
removal. The governing body of the Member shall act within 90 days to appoint an elected
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
7
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
official to fill the vacancy and shall promptly provide VLAWMO written notice of such
appointment.
3.7 Vacancies. A Member shall notify VLAWMO in writing within 10 days of the occurrence
of a vacancy in its Director or Alternate Director positions. VLAWMO will notify BWSR
of the vacancy within 30 days of receiving the notice of a vacancy as required by Minn.
Stat. § 103B.227, subd. 1. The Member shall comply with the Secretary-Treasurer of the
Board.requirements of Minn. Stat. § 103B.227, subd. 2 and appoint someone to fill the
vacancy. The Member shall promptly notify VLAWMO of the appointment in writing.
The appointed person shall serve the unexpired term of the position.
Subdivision 6. Appointment of Alternate Director. One Alternate Director shall be appointed
by each of the Members to this Agreement. The Alternate may attend the meetings of the Board
of Directors, but only the appointed Director, or the Alternate Director in the absence of the
Director, shall be allowed to vote on any matters before the Board.
3.8 Subdivision 7. Appointment of Technical Commission Representative.Commissioners.
Each Member to this Agreement shall appoint one commissionerCommissioner, and may
also appoint one alternateAlternate Commissioner, to serve on the Technical Commission.
A Member shall promptly appoint someone to fill a vacancy in their Commissioner or
Alternate Commissioner positions.
3.9 Subdivision 8. Compensation. Directors, Alternate Directors, and Commissioners shall
serve without compensation and without an expense allowance from VLAWMO. A
Director may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on VLAWMO business
with the approval of the Board. A Member may compensate its Director or, Alternate
Director, Commissioner, and Alternate Commissioner for his/hertheir service, in the
discretion of the Member.
SECTION V
ORGANIZATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
3.10 Subdivision 1. Annual Meeting; Election of Officers. At a meeting of the Board held no
later than April of each calendar year, also known as the Annual Meeting, the Board shall
elect from among the Directors a Chair, Vice Chair, and a Secretary-Treasurer, and such
other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs (“Officers”).. An
Alternate Director may not serve as an officer of VLAWMO.
3.11 Subdivision 2. Duties of Board Officers.
1)(a) Chair. The Chair shall preside over meetings of the Board, sign checks, and inreview
audits. In the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair shall perform this duty.the Chair’s
duties. In the absence of the Chair or Vice Chair, the Secretary-Treasurer shall
preside.serve as the presiding officer at the Board meeting. The Chair shall retain all
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent
at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent
at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Line spacing: single
Formatted: Line spacing: single
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38", Tab stops: 0.81", List tab + Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
8
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
rights of a Director to speak, make motions, and vote on matters coming before the
Board.
2)(b) Vice Chair. The Vice Chair shall preside at meetings when the Chair is absent and
shall automatically be promoted to complete the annual term of the Chair if the then
current Chair resigns or is removed from the Board.
3)(c) Secretary-Treasurer. The Secretary-Treasurer shall maintain a record of the
proceedings of the Board, be responsible for the custody of the Board’s records of the
Board, see that notices are duly given, and complete such other duties as the Board
may assign. The Secretary-Treasurer shall also be responsible for all monies of
VLAWMO and shall periodically report the fiscal condition of VLAWMO to the
Board. The Secretary-Treasurer may delegate one or more of its duties to another
officer or the VLAWMO Administrator. If the duties of the Secretary-Treasurer are
delegated to a VLAWMO employeeanother person, the Secretary-Treasurer shall
supervise the performance of those duties.
3.12 Subdivision 3. Quorum. A majority of the Members present shall constitute a quorum at
all Board meetings. No business or decision of the Board may be made without a quorum.
3.13 Subdivision 4. Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board shall be held at least bi-monthly
on a day and time selectedscheduled adopted by the Board. All meetings of the Board are
subject to the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. Notice of the time and place of each
meeting shall be sent to all Members, provided to the and public requesting this
information, and follow notice requirements outlined in Minnesota Statutes, Sectionshall be
provided as required by Minn. Stat. § 13D.04. Meetings shall be conducted in accordance
with rules adopted by the Board.
3.14 Subdivision 5. Voting. Each Director shall have one (1) vote in all matters, as follows
coming before the Board in accordance with the following:
1)(a) approvalApproval of the proposed annual VLAWMO operating budget and the
capital improvement program shall require approval of a simple majority of all
Directors;
(b) approval of capital improvement projects will require approval of two-thirds (2/3) of all
Directors; and
3)(b) approvalApproval of all others matters will be determined by a simple majority of
Directors present and voting.
3.15 Subdivision 6. Committees. The Board may appointestablish such committees and
subcommittees as it deems appropriate. At least one Board member shall be the appointed
as the Chairperson of each committee and all committees shall regularly report their
activities to the Board.
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +
Indent at: 0.29"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.29"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.29"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Tab stops:Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Tab stops:
Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.29"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
9
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
3.16 Subdivision 7. Public Participation. The Board may appoint such committees and
subcommittees composed of citizens as needed to provide for public participation and input
in watershed activities and the responsibilities of VLAWMO. Such citizen committees
shall be advisory.
SECTION VIIV
RESPONSIBILITIESPOWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
4.1 Subdivision 1. Policies and Procedures. The Board shall adopt rules and regulations as it
deems necessary to carry out its duties and the purpose of this Agreement. Such rules and
regulations may be amended from time to time in either a regular or special meeting of the
Board provided that notice of . No such proposed amendment has been given to each
Director at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting at which shall be adopted unless the
language of the proposed amendment will beis included in the packet for the meeting at
which it is considered. These rules and regulations, after adoption, shall be recorded in the
VLAWMO policy book.
4.2 Subdivision 2. Watershed Management Plan (Plan). The Board shall adopt a water
management plan, as required by the Act. The Plan shall be subject to the appropriate
governmental unit review as required by the Act.
4.3 Subdivision 3. Data. The Board, in order to give effect to the purposes of the Act, may:
1)(a) Acquire and record appropriate data within the Area; and
2)(b) Establish and maintain devices for acquiring and recording hydrological or other data
within the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed.
4.4 Subdivision 4. Local Studies. Each Member reserves the right to conduct separate or
concurrent studies on any matter under study by VLAWMO. The Member shall make
every effort to coordinate its studies with the VLAWMO in order to maximize the use of
resources.
4.5 Subdivision 5. Transfer of Drainage System. VLAWMO shall have the authority of a
watershed district under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103B, Chapter 103E, and other
applicable law to accept the transfer of drainage systems in the watershed, to repair,
improve, and maintain the transferred drainage systems, and to construct all new drainage
systems and improvements of existing drainage systems in the watershed. All such
activities and projects shall be carried out in accordance with the powers and procedures set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, ChaptersMinn. Stat. §§ 103B and other applicable law,.205 to
103B.255 and must be in conformance with the Watershed Management Plan adopted
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 103A through103H. .
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, English (United States)
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 12 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +
Indent at: 0.29"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38", Tab stops:Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38", Tab stops:Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
10
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
4.6 Subdivision 6. Storm Sewer Utility Fee. VLAWMO is authorized pursuant to the Special
Legislation and this Agreement developed pursuant to Minn. Stat. 103B.211 to establish
and impose on nonexempt properties within the Area a storm sewer utility fee pursuant to
Minn. Stat. § 444.075 to pay for the management of water within the watershed. The storm
sewer utility fee shall be approved by the Board and, as required by the Special Legislation,
certified to the County Auditor by November 30th each year to be placed on property taxes
payable in the following year.
4.7 Capital Improvements.
(a) Authority. VLAWMO is authorized to undertake, construct, and maintain capital
improvements within the Area and may cooperate with one or more Members in the
construction and maintenance of such improvements.
(b) New Capital Improvements. A proposed new capital improvement may be initiated by
VLAWMO, the TEC, or by one or more Members. If the Board agrees to include the
proposed capital improvement in its Capital Improvement. Each Program, it will
undertake the process to include it in the Watershed Management Plan, its budget, and
to work cooperatively with the affected Member agrees to contribute its
proportionateas needed to complete the Capital Improvement.
(c) Costs. VLAWMO may use funds budgeted by the Board for the capital improvement,
as well as any funds received from grants and any other outside funding sources. If
VLAWMO works cooperatively with one or more Members to construct a capital
improvement, the parties will enter into a cooperative agreement that identifies the
responsibilities and cost share of all approved capital improvement expenditures,
which includeseach party toward the project, including associated engineering,
planning, legal, and administrative costs, based on the benefit to be received by each
Member or other entity from the improvement or management project. The Board
shall submit, in writing, a statement to each Member or other entity, setting forth in
detail the expenses incurred by VLAWMO for each project..
Capital improvement projects may be initiated either by: (1) recommendation of the VLAWMO
Board to the governmental unit(s) affected; or (2) petition to the Board by the affected
governmental unit. In either case, and after study and approval by two-thirds (2/3) of the
Directors, the Board shall provide the affected governmental units with estimated costs and a
description of the benefits to be realized by those affected and the costs to be borne based on
benefit.
(d) Subdivision 7. County Levy. Nothing in this Agreement limits the authority of
VLAWMO to undertake capital improvements and to certify the costs to the County
for collection in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.251.
4.8 Water Conveyances. The Board may order any local governmental unit to construct, clean,
repair, alter, abandon, consolidate, reclaim or change the course of terminus of any ditch,
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.38" + Indentat: 0.63"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
11
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
drain, storm sewer, water course, natural or artificial, that affects the Vadnais Lakes Area
Watershed in accordance with its adopted plans.
4.9 Subdivision 8. Watershed Operations. The Board may order any local government unit to
acquire, operate, construct or maintain dams, dikes, reservoirs and appurtenant works in
accordance with adopted plans.
4.10 Subdivision 9. Storm and Surface Waters. The Board shall regulate, conserve and control
the use of storm and surface water within the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed pursuant to
its Watershed Management Plan.
4.11 Subdivision 10. Entrance upon Land. To the extent permitted by Minnesota Statuteslaw,
or with the owner’s permission, the Board or its designated representatives may enter upon
lands within or outside the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed to make surveys and
investigations to accomplish the purposes of VLAWMO and the Act.
4.12 Subdivision 11. Legal and Technical Assistance. The Board may obtain and provide legal
and technical assistance as it determines is needed, including in connection with its on-
going operations and projects, as well as in matters ofany litigation or, and on such other
proceedings between one or more of its Members and any other political subdivision,
commission, board or agency relating to the planning or construction of facilities to drain
or pond storm waters within matters as the AreaBoard may request.
4.13 Subdivision 12. Permits. VLAWMO shall cooperate with appropriate local, state, and
federal agencies in obtaining required permits and shall review permits issued by local
units of government to accomplish the purposes identified in Section I of this Agreement.
4.14 Subdivision 13. Office. VLAWMO shall maintain an office within the Area. All notices
to VLAWMO shall be mailed or delivered to such office.
4.15 Subdivision 14. Insurance and Liability. VLAWMO may contract for or purchase such
insurance as the Board deems necessary for its protection. The Members agree as follows
with respect to the liability of VLAWMO and the Members:
1)(a) VLAWMO is a separate and distinct public entity to which the Members have
transferred all responsibility and control for action taken pursuant to this Agreement.
2)(b) VLAWMO shall defend and indemnify the Members, and their officers, employees,
and volunteers, from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including
attorney fees, arising out of the acts or omissions of the Board of Directors in carrying
out the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement does not constitute a waiver on the
limitations of liability set forth in Minnesota Statutes, sectionMinn. Stat. § 466.04.
3)(c) Nothing herein shall be construed to provide insurance coverage or indemnification to
an officer, employee, or volunteer of any member for any act or omission for which
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +
Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25"
Formatted ...
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted ...
Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.13"
Formatted ...
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
12
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
the officer, employee, or volunteer is guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect
of duty, or bad faith.
4)(d) To the fullest extent permitted by law, action by the Members to this Agreement are
intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity,” and it is the intent of
the Members that they shall be deemed a “single governmental unit” for purposes of
liability, as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, sectionMinn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. 1a, and
provided further that for purposes of that statute, each part to this Agreement
expressly declines responsibility for the acts and omissions of another Member. The
Members are not liable for the acts or omissions of another Member to this
Agreement except to the extent they have expressly agreed in writing to be
responsible for the acts or omissions of the other Members.
5)(e) Any excess or uninsured liability shall be borne equally by all the Members, but this
does not include the liability of any individual officer, employee or volunteer that
arises from his or her own malfeasance, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith.
4.16 Subdivision 15. Financial Records. The Board shall maintain the books and accounts of
VLAWMO consistent with generally accepted accounting principles and provide the
separate accounting of operations and capital improvement projects.
4.17 Subdivision 16. Audit. The Board shall annually cause an independent certified audit of
the books and accounts of VLAWMO.
4.18 Subdivision 17. Claims. To the extent required by Minnesota Statutes, VLAWMO shall
be responsible for damages caused by it. All Minnesota Statutes governing notices of
claims and limits on municipal liability shall be applicable to VLAWMO. To the extent
permitted by Minnesota Statutes, VLAWMO shall be treated as a single municipal entity
for municipal liability purposes.
4.19 Subdivision 18. Employees. The Board may employ or subcontract towith such persons
or entities as it determines are needed to fulfill defined responsibilities of VLAWMO with
the approval of a majority of the Board.
4.20 Subdivision 19. Contracts. The Board may make such contracts and enter into such
agreements as necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Any such contract
or agreement shall be in accordance with the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law,
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.345, the Joint Powers Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section
471.59, and or such other applicable laws.
4.21 Subdivision 20. Annual Report to Members. The Board shall make and file a report to
allwith the administrator of theeach Members at least once each year includingthat includes
the following information:
1)(a) theThe financial condition of VLAWMO;
Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.13"
Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38",Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Startat: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: -0.38"
Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38",Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Startat: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at:
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold, English (United States)
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted ...
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted ...
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
13
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
2)(b) theThe status of all VLAWMO projects and work; and
3)(c) theThe business transacted by VLAWMO and other matters which affect the
interests of VLAWMO.
Copies of said report shall be transmitted to the administrator of each Member.
4.22 Subdivision 21. Records. VLAWMO’s books, reports and records shall be available for
and open to inspection at reasonable times.
4.1 Subdivision 22. Other Powers. The Board may exercise such other powers necessary and
incidental to the implementation of the purposes set forth herein as authorized by the
Members.
Subdivision 23. Amendments to this Agreement. The Board may recommend changes in this
Agreement to the Members. This Agreement may be amended only by the Agreement of each of
its members.
SECTION VII
RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF TECHNICAL COMMISSION
4.23 Subdivision 1. Planning.
Duties and Responsibilities. The Board shall establish a Technical Commission (Commission)
that will provide technical expertise for the planning and operation of VLAWMO programs and
projects. This Commission through the VLAWMO Administrator and other VLAWMO
employees shall administer the day-to-day operations of VLAWMO. The VLAWMO
Administrator shall serve as a non-voting member of the Commission. Each Member shall
appoint a representative, who will be known as Commissioner, and an alternate to the
Commission.
Subdivision 2. Eligibility to Serve. Each Member shall determine the eligibility or
qualification standards for its Commission appointment, following guidelines promulgated by
the Board.
Subdivision 3. Technical Commission Officers. The Board shall annually appoint a Chair
from among the Commissioners. At the first meeting of the Commission each calendar year, the
Commission shall elect from among the Commissioners a Vice Chair and Secretary, and such
other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs. An Alternate
Commissioner may not serve as an officer of the Commission.
Subdivision 4. Meetings. Regular monthly meetings of the Commission shall be held on a day
and time selected by the Commissioners. All meetings of the Commission are subject to the
Minnesota Open Meeting Law. Notice of the time and place of each meeting shall be sent to all
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Tab stops:Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31"
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Tab stops:Not at 0.5"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
14
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
commissioners, and provided to the public requesting this information, and follow notice
requirements outlined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.04. Meetings shall be conducted in
accordance with the latest version of Roberts Rules of Order. Each Commissioner shall have one
vote.
A majority of the Commissioners present shall constitute a quorum at all Commission meetings.
In the absence of a quorum, a scheduled meeting shall be opened, re-scheduled and adjourned.
(a) Subdivision 5. Watershed Management Plan (Plan). The Commission VLAWMO
shall prepare and/or update a water management plan, as required by the Act. The
Plan, either a new one or an updated one, shall be recommended to the Board of
Directors for approval. The Plan shall be compliant with Minnesota Statutes,
Ch.Minn. Stat., chap. 103B as it may be amended and applicable Minnesota Rules.
The Plan shall be subject to the appropriate governmental unit review as required by
the Act.
(b) Subdivision 6. Local Water Management Plan. After the adoption of a new or
revised watershed management plan, each Member and any other local government
unit within the Area shall review its local water management plan for changes needed
for it to be consistent with the new or revised Watershed Management Plan. Each
local water management plan shall include shall be consistent with the Plan and state
law. After consideration, but before adoption of a new or revised local water
management plan by the governmental unit, each Member or any other governmental
units in the Area shall submit its water management plan to the Board. The Board
shall within sixty (60) days approve or disapprove the plan or parts thereof. If the
Board fails to complete its review within the prescribed period, and unless an
extension is agreed to by the Member or other local governmental unit, the local plan
shall be deemed approved consistent with applicable state laws.
4.24 Other Powers. The Board may exercise such other powers necessary and incidental to the
implementation of the purposes set forth herein as authorized by the Members.
4.25 Special Tax District. Nothing in this Agreement limits the authority of a Member to
establish a special tax district pursuant to its authority under Minn. Stat. 103B.245 or such
other law as may apply.
4.26 Amendments to this Agreement. The Board may recommend changes in this Agreement to
the Members. This Agreement may be amended only by the agreement of all of its
Members.
SECTION V
RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF TECHNICAL COMMISSION
Subdivision 7. Appeals of Decisions and Recommendations of the Commission. Members
shall comply with Commission’s determinations as to the force and effect of the Watershed
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.38" + Indentat: 0.63"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.75"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.38" + Indentat: 0.63"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" +Indent at: 0.25"
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Line spacing: single
Formatted: Line spacing: single
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
15
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Management Plan, the Local Water Management Plans and any cost allocations for
improvements initiated pursuant to these plans.
Any governmental unit which disputes a determination of the Commission as to force and effect
of the Watershed Management Plan, any Local Water Management Plan, or the cost allocations
for improvements, initiated pursuant to these plans, may appeal the recommendation or decision
to the Board within thirty (30) days of receipt of such written notice of such determination.
Should the appeal not be completed to the satisfaction of all parties, a party may submit the
dispute to arbitration. Arbitration shall be conducted in the following manner:
1) A governmental unit shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the written decision on
the appeal by the Board to submit a dispute to arbitration by giving written notice to an
officer of the Board;
2) The Board of Arbitration shall consist of three Members, one appointed by the
governmental unit initiating the arbitration, one appointed by the Board and one
appointed by the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the State of Minnesota, if willing to
do so and if not, by the Chief Judge of the Ramsey County District Court. The third
member so appointed shall preside at the arbitration hearing;
3) The arbitration cost of the neutral arbitrator shall be divided equally between VLAWMO
and the government unit initiating the arbitration; and
4) Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act
(Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 572), except as modified above.
Subdivision 8. Other Duties. The Commission shall exercise such other duties necessary and
incidental to the implementation of the purposes set forth herein as authorized by the Board.
SECTION VIII
5.1 Establishment. The Board has established, and shall maintain, a Technical Commission
(“TEC”) that provides technical expertise for the planning and operation of VLAWMO
programs and projects. Each Member shall appoint one Commissioner and one Alternate
Commissioner to serve on the TEC. Each Member shall determine the eligibility or
qualification standards for its TEC appointments, following guidelines promulgated by the
Board. The VLAWMO Administrator shall serve as a non-voting member of VLAWMO.
5.2 Duties and Responsibilities. The TEC, through the VLAWMO Administrator and other
VLAWMO employees, shall administer the day-to-day operations of VLAWMO and shall
review VLAWMO expenditures. The TEC has the authority to review and approve
VLAWMO’s monthly expenditures and may approve capital improvements in accordance
with a policy adopted by the Board. The Board may assign additional duties and
responsibilities to the TEC as it may determine are appropriate.
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Line spacing: single
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
16
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
5.3 Technical Commission Officers. At the first meeting of the TEC each calendar year the
Commissioners shall appoint from among its members a Chair, Vice-Chair, Financial
Officer, and Liaison to the Board. The TEC shall assign duties to the officers as it deems
appropriate. An Alternate Commissioner may not serve as an officer of the TEC.
5.4 Meetings. Regular monthly meetings of the TEC shall be held on a day and time selected
by the Commissioners. All meetings of VLAWMO are subject to the Minnesota Open
Meeting Law. Notice of the time and place of each meeting shall be sent to all
Commissioners, and provided to the public requesting this information, and follow notice
requirements outlined in Minn. Stat. § 13D.04. Meetings shall be conducted in accordance
with the rules adopted by the TEC or, if a specific set of rules has not been adopted, then
the latest version of Roberts Rules of Order. Each Commissioner shall have one vote. A
majority of the Commissioners present shall constitute a quorum at all TEC meetings. In
the absence of a quorum, a scheduled meeting shall be opened, re-scheduled, and
adjourned.
SECTION VI
FINANCING VLAWMO
6.1 Subdivision 1. Annual Operating Budget. On or before September 1st of each year,The
annual VLAWMO budget, which includes both operational costs and capital improvement
costs, shall be developed and approved as provided in this section.
(a) Staff Prepares Draft. VLAWMO staff shall work with the Board shall appropriate
Member staff to prepare a preliminary draft long range budget, which shall include the
proposed annual operating budget for the following calendar year. The budget shall
provide funds to operate VLAWMO for the next calendar year. The proposed
operating budgetupcoming year and the sources for these funds shall be proposed SSU
rates.
(b) Budget Subcommittee Recommendation. VLAWMO staff shall present the
preliminary draft budget to the budget subcommittee. The budget subcommittee is
responsible for reviewing and making a recommendation to the Board regarding the
proposed budget and the SSU rates.
(c) Budget Approval. The Board shall consider the annual budget as recommended for by
the budget subcommittee and act on the annual budget. The Board may modify the
annual budget proposed by the budget subcommittee. This review and approval to the
Members. of the annual budget typically occurs at the June Board meeting, but can
occur at a different meeting as the Board may determine is appropriate.
(d) SSU Rate Approval. The Board shall consider and act to approve the SSU rates. This
review and approval typically occurs at the August Board meeting, but can occur at a
different meeting as the Board may determine is appropriate.
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indentat: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.69"
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
17
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
(e) SSU Charge Certification. The Board shall act by November 1st each year to certify
the SSU charges to the County Auditor for collection on the upcoming year’s property
taxes.
(f) Final Budget Approval. The Board shall act to approve the final budget for the
upcoming year before December 31st each year.
6.2 Funding. The annual operating budget may beis funded by one or more of the following:
(a) The primary source of funding for the annual budget is the SSU charges imposed on
properties within the watershed each year pursuant to the special legislation.
(b) VLAWMO may also receive grants to help fund specific capital improvements.
(a) IfAn authorized special tax levy authorized by the State of Minnesota for an amount
approved by the Members;
(b) VLAWMO operates Storm Water Utility authorized by the State of Minnesota and
approved by the Members;
(c) Annual payment from each governmental unit party to this agreement and other entities
based on an annual assessment as determined in Subdivision 2 in this Section; and
(d) Service fees, grants, interest or other funding sources as available.
Each Member shall pay its annual assessment in the following manner:
1) The entire amount shall be due by January 31st of the year due; or
2) One-half (1/2) of each Members entire amount shall be due by January 31 of the year due
and the second one-half (1/2) of the entire amount shall be due by August 31 of the year
due.
Failure to pay the required amounts by the due dates will cause a one percent (1%) per month
service fee to be added to the unpaid amount due.
Subdivision 2. Budget Meeting and Approval. The proposed annual Operating and Capital
Improvement budget for the next calendar year shall be prepared by September 1 each calendar
year.
Subdivision 3. Annual Assessment for Services.
(c) The annual contribution of each Member or other entity the funds collected from the
SSU charges and grants are not sufficient to fully fund an approved budget, the Board
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.06", Hanging: 0.31", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +
Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.13" + Tabafter: 0.38" + Indent at: 0.38", Tab stops: 0.75", List tab + 1.06", Left + 1.13", List tab + Not at 0.38"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0"
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
18
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
may exercise any other authority available to it under law to fund the budget including,
but not limited, Member assessments.
6.3 Member Assessments.
(a) Authorized. A Member assessment may be imposed to cover an anticipated shortfall
in VLAWMO’s annual budget. A Member assessment amount shall be calculated
using the formula set out in this section. At least 10 days prior to the meeting at
which the Board considers acting on a proposed Member assessment, VLAWMO shall
provide each Member written notice of the proposed Member assessment that
identifies the amount to be paid by each Member. Members shall be given an
opportunity to be heard at the meeting before the Board acts on the Member
assessment. A Member assessment must be approved by at least a 2/3 majority of the
full Board by no later than September 1st for collection in the following year. If
approved, VLAWMO shall notify each Member in writing of the approved Member
assessment amount.
(b) Formula. To the extent a Member assessment is established, it shall be calculated
based upon the following formula:
1)(1) Forty percent (40%) based upon the assessed valuation of all real property of
each government unit within the Area;
2)(2) Forty percent (40%) based upon the total area of the property within each
governmental unit with the Area; and
3)(3) Twenty percent (20%) based upon the population of each governmental unit
within the Area.
(c) Subdivision 4. Payment. Each Member shall pay its Member assessment amount: (1)
no later than January 31st in the year in which it is due; or pay one-half (1/2) of the
assessment by January 31st of the year due and pay the second one-half (1/2) of the
assessment by August 31st of the year due. If a Member fails to pay its assessment by
the applicable due dates, it will be required to pay a one percent (1%) per month
service on the unpaid amount due.
6.4 Capital Improvement Projects Program and Funding. On or before July 1 of each
(a) Preparation. Each year the Board shall prepare a capital improvements
programCapital Improvement Program and budget for projectsCapital Improvements
anticipated to be started or completed in the following year as described in the
WaterWatershed Management Plan. Each proposed projectCapital Improvement shall
be describedspecifically identified and its estimated cost and time for completion shall
be provided. Only projects describedCapital Improvements included in the Watershed
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.38" + Indentat: 0.63", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.63", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.69", Hanging:
0.38", Numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indentat: 2", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.69", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indentat: 2", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.69", Hanging: 0.38", Numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.75" + Indentat: 2", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.63", Tab stops: 1.06", Left
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
19
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Management Plan, or its amendments, may be included in the capital improvement
budget.
Funding in the capital improvement budget shall be calculated as follows:
(a) If money raised by the Special tax levies to be used for Capital Projects, the Members
shall be provided the opportunity to review and approve the amount of the tax levy that
will be used for Capital Projects within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Board’s Capital
Improvement Budget;
(b) If a capital project is to. Capital Improvements may be funded wholly or in part by a
combination of funds budgeted by VLAWMO as part of its annual budget, grants
received by VLAWMO, and expenditures made directly by one or more governmental
unit(s), they will be provided the opportunity to review and approve or
disapproveMembers. For jointly funded projects, VLAWMO shall agree in writing with
the capital improvement budget within sixty (60) days of receipt of Members making
direct contributions toward the Board's Capital Improvement Budget; and
3)(a)If service fees, grants, interest or other funding sources are available the source and
amounts of such funds shall be shownfunding and.
(b) If the capital improvement budget is approved, as provided above, each governmental
unit shall contribute its budgeted share of the cost ofresponsibilities toward
constructing said capital improvement projectsand maintaining the Capital
Improvement.
6.5 Subdivision 5. Governmental Unit Financing. Members may establish a watershed
management tax district in the Area for the purpose of paying costs of the engineering and
planning required to develop a watershed management plan for the Area. After the plan is
adopted and approved, a tax district may be established for the purpose of paying capital
costs of projects described in the plan (including normal and routine maintenance of
projects). If required, the tax district shall be established by ordinance adopted after a
hearing by a local government unit, following provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
ChapterMinn. Stat., chap. 103B.
6.6 Subdivision 6. Reserve Funds. The Board may accumulate reserve funds for the purposes
herein mentioned and may invest funds of the Board not currently needed for its operations
in the manner and subject to the laws of Minnesota applicable to statutory cities. Any and
all reserve funds must be clearly indicated on the annual financial audit provided to the
Members.
6.7 Subdivision 7. Gifts; Grants; Loans. VLAWMO may, within the scope of this
Agreement, accept gifts, apply for and use grants or loans of money or other property from
the United States, the State of Minnesota, a unit of government or other governmental unit
or organization or any person or entity for the purposes described herein; may enter into
Formatted: Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.13" + Tabafter: 0.38" + Indent at: 0.38", Tab stops: 0.75", List tab + 1.06", Left + 1.13", List tab + Not at 0.38"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38", Hanging: 0.31", Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … +Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Tabafter: 0.51" + Indent at: 0.51", Tab stops: 0.75", List tab +Not at 0.51"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +
Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold, English (United States)
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.38"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
20
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
any reasonable agreement required in connection therewith, shall comply with any laws or
regulations applicable thereto, and may hold, use and dispose of such money or property in
accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan or agreement related thereto.
6.8 Subdivision 8. Disbursements. All VLAWMO disbursements on budget items shall be
reviewed and approved by the Technical Committee. A report of all disbursements shall be
sent to the Board’s Secretary-Treasurer of the Board and the finance officer of the
Technical Commissionand the TEC’s Finance Officer for review. and a copy provided to
the Board. Checks issued by VLAWMO shall have two signatures. Officers andbe signed
by the VLAWMO Administrator may be authorized to sign checks. An Officersand the
Board Chair. The Secretary-Treasurer shall maintain a bond shall be maintained by
VLAWMO in the amount of at least $10,000. VLAWMO will be responsible for paying
the premium on said bond.
6.9 Subdivision 9. Revenue Bonds to Secure MPCA Loan. VLAWMO is given express
authority to issue revenue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $800,000 (the
“Bonds”) to secure the Loan to finance the Project. The term “Bonds” shall also include
bonds issued to refund and refinance the Bonds. As provided in Minn. Stat. § 471.59,
subd. 11, the Bonds shall be revenue obligations of VLAWMO which are issued on behalf
of the Members, and shall be issued subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in
Minn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. 11. The Bonds shall be payable solely from VLAWMO’s
revenues including its storm water utility fees. VLAWMO may not pledge to the payment
of the Bonds the full faith and credit or taxing power of the Members. No bonds,
obligations or other forms of indebtedness other than the Bonds may be issued by
VLAWMO without the prior consent of the Members.
SECTION IXVII
DURATION OF THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
7.1 Subdivision 1. Duration of Agreement. Each Member agrees to be bound by the terms of
this Agreement until December 31, 20262046, and that it may be continued thereafter at the
option of the Members. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the filing of
certified copy of the resolution approving said Agreement by each governmental
unitMember.
7.2 Subdivision 2. Termination of Agreement. This agreement may be terminated prior to
January 1, 2025December 31, 2046, by the unanimous consent of the parties. If the
agreement is to be terminated, a notice of the intent to dissolve the VLAWMO shall be sent
to the Board of Water and Soil Resources and to Ramsey and Anoka Counties at least 90
days prior to the date of dissolution.
7.3 Subdivision 3. Dissolution. In addition to the manner provided in Subdivision 2 for
termination as provided above, any memberMember may petition the Board of Directors to
dissolve the agreement.this Agreement. Upon ninety (90) days’ notice in writing to the
clerk of each member governmental unit and toMember, the Board of Water and Soil
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, Widow/Orphan control, Tabstops: Not at 0.5"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Space Before: 0 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 +Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left +Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Widow/Orphan control, Tab
stops: Not at 0.5"
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" +Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" +Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
21
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Resources, and to Anoka and Ramsey County, the Board shall hold a hearing and upon a
favorable vote by a majority of all eligible votes of then existing Board members, the
Board may by Resolution recommend that the VLAWMO be dissolved. Said Resolution
shall be submitted to each member governmental unit and if ratified by three-fourths of the
councilsgoverning bodies of all eligible membersMembers within sixty (60) days, said
Board shall dissolve the VLAWMO allowing a reasonable time to complete work in
progress, pay any outstanding obligations, and to dispose of personal property owned by
the VLAWMO.
Subdivision 4. Assets. Upon a set of findings and order for dissolution of VLAWMO by the
State Board of Water and Soil Resources, all property of VLAWMO shall be transferred, either
jointly or severally, to the governmental units of VLAWMO.Members. Such transfer of
VLAWMO assets may be made in proportion the total contribution of each Member as required
by the last annual operating budget.
7.4 The transfer of real estate property of VLAWMO pursuant to this section shall not affect
the benefits or damages for any improvement previously constructed by VLAWMO before
dissolution. The real estate property affected shall remain liable for its proper share of any
outstanding indebtedness of VLAWMO applying to the property before the dissolution,
and levies assessmentassessed for the indebtedness continue in force until the debt is paid
off.
SECTION VIII
SECTION XI
EFFECTIVE DATE
Subdivision 1. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
8.1 Adoption of Agreement. This agreementAgreement shall be in full force and effect upon
the filing of a certified copy of the resolution approving said agreement by all six members.
Said resolution shall be filed with the Chair of the existing VLAWMO who shall notify all
membersMembers in writing of its effective date and shall set the date for the next meeting
to be conducted under this amended Joint Powers Agreement.
8.2 Dispute Resolution. The Members agree that any dispute that cannot be resolved by
discussions among the Board and a Member shall be submitted to mediation. The
mediation shall be conducted in accordance with a process agreed to by the parties. If the
parties are not able to mutually agree on a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and
the two mediators shall select a third. Each party to the mediation shall be responsible for
the cost of the mediator it selected and shall share equally in the costs of the mediation and
of the third mediator. If the dispute is not resolved in mediation, the parties may agree to
submit the dispute to binding arbitration or either party may pursue any options available to
it under law to seek a resolution of the dispute.
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: English (United States)
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" +Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Line spacing: single
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Underline
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2,3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" +Indent at: 0.5", Tab stops: 0.44", Left + Not at 0.5"
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
22
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
8.3 Data Practices. VLAWMO shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat., chap. 13,
the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Any entity with which VLAWMO
contracts is required to comply with the Act as provided in Minn. Stat. § 13.05. The
contractor shall be required to notify the Board if it receives a data request and to work
with VLAWMO to respond to it.
8.4 Amendments. The Board may recommend changes and amendments to this Agreement to
the governing bodies of the Members. Amendments shall be adopted by all governing
bodies of the Members. Adopted amendments shall be evidenced by appropriate
resolutions or certified copies of meeting minutes of the governing bodies of each party
filed with the Board and shall, if no effective date is contained in the amendment, become
effective as of the date all such filings have been completed.
8.5 Waiver. The delay or failure of any party of this Agreement at any time to require
performance or compliance by any other party of any of its obligations under this
Agreement shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance
or compliance.
8.6 Headings and Captions. The headings and captions of these paragraphs and sections of this
Agreement are included for convenience or reference only and shall not constitute a part
hereof.
8.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the recitals and the official boundary map
(which are incorporated in and made part of this Agreement), contains the entire
understanding among the Members concerning the subject matter hereof. This Agreement
supersedes and replaces the prior joint powers agreement among the Members regarding
VLAWMO and such prior agreement is hereby terminated. Any outstanding obligations of
the Members under the prior agreement are not affected by the termination and shall be
continued under this Agreement.
8.8 Examination of Books. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books,
records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Board are subject to
examination by the State.
8.9 Governing Law. The respective rights, obligations, and remedies of the Members under
this Agreement and the interpretation thereof shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Minnesota which pertain to agreements made and to be performed in the State of
Minnesota.
8.10 Counterparts. This Agreement shall be executed in several counterparts and all so executed
shall constitute one Agreement, binding on all of the Members hereto. Each party to the
agreement shall receive a fully executed copy of the entire document following adoption
by all Members.
8.11 Notice. To the extend this Agreement requires a notice to be mailed to a Member, the
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
23
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
notice requirement may be satisfied by VLAWMO emailing the notice to its primary
contact for the Member.
8.12 Statutory References. All references to statutes in this Agreement include any amendments
made thereto and any successor provisions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units, by action of their
governing bodies, have caused this agreementAgreement to be executed in accordance with the
authority of Minnesota Statutes, SectionsMinn. Stat. §§ 103B. 211 and 471.59.
2016 JPA with Prior Amendments INITIAL DRAFT 4-14-25
24
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
CITY OF GEM LAKE By _________________________
Mayor
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES By _________________________
Mayor
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
CITY OF NORTH OAKS By _________________________
Mayor
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
CITY OF VADNAIS HEIGHTS By _________________________
Mayor
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE By _________________________
Mayor
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP By _________________________
Chair
Dated ___/___/___ Attest _________________________
City Clerk
(VLAWMOJPA2007)
Formatted: Left