The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/09/2025 PZ Combined Packet Meeting guidelines on reverse side. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, July 9th, 2025 Broadcast on Cable TV Channel 16 and northmetrotv.com/lino-lakes-stream ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 6:30 P.M. Council Chambers (televised) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Public Comment (sign-in prior to start of meeting per Rules of Decorum) 4. Setting the Agenda: Addition or Deletion of Agenda Items 5. Approval of Minutes: June 11, 2025 6. Action Items A. PUBLIC HEARING for Peltier Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat B. 1210 Main Street Accessory Structure Variance 7. Discussion Items A. Main Street Master Plan Draft Presentation B. Project Updates ADJOURNMENT CITY OF LINO LAKES ADVISORY BOARD MEETING GUIDELINES Advisory boards are fact-finding bodies established to aid the City Council in specific areas. The decisions of any board are considered advisory only and all final decisions rest with the City Council. Board meetings shall operate in accordance with the procedures established by the City Council. The following meeting guidelines are derived from the City Council Rules of Decorum. Members of the Audience – No person in the audience shall engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct such as audible commentary during a meeting, hand clapping, stamping of feet, whistling, using profane language, yelling and similar demonstrations, which conduct disturbs the peace and good order of the meeting. Public Comment– Comments from the public will be accepted on any matter, whether on the agenda or not. Comments will not be accepted during specific agenda items unless a Public Hearing has been noticed. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the following guidelines: • Sign-in prior to the start of the meeting • Step up to the microphone when recognized by the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice- Chair) • State your name and address for the record • State the subject to be discussed • Limit comments to 3 minutes • Address comments to the board as a whole, not any specific member • No question may be asked of a board member or staff member without the permission of the Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) • Elect a spokesperson for a group of persons who wish to address the board on the same subject Public Hearing – A public hearing is a separate item of business on the agenda. It gives the public an opportunity to comment on the topic identified. Please remember to be courteous and respectful and abide by the guidelines outlined for public comment (although no sign-in required). Typically, a public hearing proceeds as follows: 1. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) will announce the agenda item and staff will present their report. 2. Board members have the opportunity to ask staff questions about the item. 3. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) opens the public hearing and will recognize those who want to speak. 4. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall close the public hearing. 5. The Board will then discuss the item. No further public comments are allowed. 6. The Board will make a recommendation and/or decision. After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall address the board from the audience on the matter under consideration. The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice-Chair) shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on June 11, 2025. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Root declared public comment open at 6:31 p.m. There were no public comments. Mr. Laden moved to close public comment. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Public comment was closed at 6:31 p.m. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Kohler moved to approve the May 14, 2025 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 – 0. DATE: June 11, 2025 TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED: 6:58 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Neil Evenson, Michael Root, Perry Laden, Suzy Guthmueller, Patrick Kohler MEMBERS ABSENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech STAFF PRESENT: Katie Larsen, Diane Hankee, Kate Achenbach Marissa Ertel Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2025 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Public Hearing: Erickson Property Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. The applicant, Hampton Companies, submitted a land use application for rezoning and preliminary plat for a residential subdivision called Erickson Property. The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing lot located at 7590 20th Avenue in 14 single family lots. Mr. Evenson had questions for staff regarding the trail along 20th and why the developer would not be creating the trail connection. Ms. Larsen stated that the park dedication fees would not cover the connection completely, but the developer would be grading the location in order for the trail connection to be made. Mr. Laden wanted to know why the connection to Osakis was made in a curved shape. Zeke Peters, Landform, was available for questions. Mr. Peters stated that the connection was made in order to preserve as many trees on the site as possible. Chair Root opened the public hearing at 6:41 p.m. No public comments were made. Mr. Evenson moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. The public hearing was closed at 6:42 p.m. Mr. Laden moved to approve the preliminary plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 5 – 0. B. Public Hearing: Phelps Road Stockpile Interim Use Permit Ms. Achenbach presented the staff report. Mark Smith resubmitted a Land Use Application for an interim use permit for earth moving and stockpiling on a property located on Phelps Road (PID #24-31-22-42-0004). The City’s Planning and Zoning Board and City Council approved this project back in 2022/2023. The applicant did not move forward with the project at that time and is now seeking approval again. There are no proposed changes to the project. Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2025 Page 3 DRAFT MINUTES The applicant is requesting approval of an interim use permit to place approximately 71,000 cubic yards (CY) of suitable fill material on the site for use during future industrial development. The stockpiles are proposed to be up to 15 feet higher than the existing grade of the site. Three separate stockpiles are proposed. Mr. Kohler asked staff if Phelps Road was designed to handle the heavy traffic flow. Ms. Hankee stated that Phelps Road would be able to handle the heavy traffic flow. Chair Root wanted to confirm that this site would be used for industrial purposes and whether there was a plan if the site was not occupied in the five-year span of the permit. Ms. Hankee confirmed that even if the site was not occupied by the five-year permit span the material would still be useful for future development. Chair Root opened the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. No public comments were made. Mr. Laden moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden. The public hearing was closed at 6:57 p.m. Mr. Kohler moved to approve the interim use permit subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion seconded by Ms. Laden. Motion carried 5 – 0. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Ms. Larsen provided project updates to the board. Mr. Evenson moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Kohler. Meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Marissa Ertel – Community Development Administrative Assistant 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: July 9, 2025 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING for Peltier Ponds 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2. Rezoning 3. PUD Preliminary Plan 4. Preliminary Plat CASE NUMBER: CPA2025-0002 PZC2025-0004 APPLICANT: U.S. Home, LLC Attn: Josh Metzer 16355 36th Avenue N, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55446 OWNER: Hal Leibel 7566 Peltier Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55038 INTRODUCTION The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC (aka Lennar), is proposing a master planned residential development located west of CSAH 54 (20th Ave N) across from Watermark, east of Peltier Lake, and north of the City of Centerville border. The development contains four (4) parcels totaling approximately 125 gross acres and 246 housing units. The proposed development is called Peltier Ponds. Tentative Review Schedule: Complete Application Date: June 5, 2025 60-Day Deadline: August 4, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: June 25, 2025 Park Board Meeting: July 2, 2025 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: July 9, 2025 2 City Council Work Session: August 4, 2025 City Council Meeting: August 11, 2025 BACKGROUND The Land Use Application is for the following: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning • PUD Preliminary Plan • Preliminary Plat This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Applicant Narrative prepared by Lennar received on May 23, 2025 • Peltier Ponds Preliminary Plat and Plan Sheets prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. dated May 21, 2025 • Peltier Ponds Preliminary Landscape Plans prepared by Calyx Design Group dated May 9, 2025 • Peltier Ponds Land Use & Density Plan prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. dated May 21, 2025 • Architectural Plans prepared by Lennar received on May 23, 2025 • Stormwater Management Plan Narrative and Summary prepared by James R. Hill dated April 4, 2025 • Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Bruan Intertec dated October 1, 2024 • Master Plan Booklet prepared by Lennar dated May 30, 2025 • Resource Inventory Report prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Traffic Impact Group, Inc. dated April 22, 2025 • Traffic Noise Assessment prepared by David Braslau dated May 9, 2025 • Joint Application for Wetland Replacement Plan prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. dated April 17, 2025 ANALYSIS History In November 2024, the applicant submitted a PUD Concept Plan for advisory board and Council input for a 262 housing unit development. Current Proposal 3 Peltier Ponds will consist of single-family homes and townhomes with a similar variety to those built in Watermark. The total number of housing units is 246. See the attached applicant’s narrative for a detailed description of the development. Housing Products The following table compares the PUD Concept Plan to the proposed Preliminary Plat. CMA back-to- back townhome CMS row townhome 55-foot single- family lots 65-foot single- family lots 80-foot single- family lots Bedrooms 3 3 2 to 4 3 to 5 3 to 5 Home Sq Ft 1770-1800 1800-1900 942-2400 1920- 3876 1920- 3876 Garage Stalls 2 2 2 to 3 3 3 to 4 Garage Sq Ft 405 379-388 445-744 626-780 645-951 Starting Price $345,000 $365,000 $525,000 $575,000 $635,000 Concept Plan Home Count 74 39 75 49 25 262 Preliminary Plat Home Count 48 33 89 45 31 246 Home Count Difference -26 -6 +14 -4 +6 -16 The residential development transitions from larger 80ft wide single family lots near Peltier Lake and Rehbein Street to 65ft, 55ft, and townhomes adjacent to CSAH 54 (20th Ave N.). Land Use and Open Space The attached Land Use & Density Plan and table below details the proposed land uses and acres. Land Use Acres % Townhomes 3.71 3.0% Single Family 80ft 11.19 9.0% Single Family 65ft 10.82 8.7% Single Family 55ft 18.56 14.8% 4 Private Drive 1.93 1.5% Public Road Right-of-Way 20.19 16.1% Private Open Space 3.92 3.1% Public Open Space 24.96 20.0% Public Park 5.37 4.3% Stormwater Ponds 10.58 8.5% Wetlands 13.79 11.0% TOTAL 125.02 100.0% A 5 acre public park, trails, sidewalks, open space and stormwater ponds are included throughout the development creating a multi-functional greenway corridor. Public open space (public open space + public park + stormwater ponds + wetlands) is 54.7 acres or 43.8% of the entire development. Private open space is 3.9 acres or 41% of the townhome development. Total open space (public 54.7 acres + private 3.9 acres) is 58.6 acres or 47%. Per City Code Section 1007.024(6)(c) of the PUD, Planned Unit Development ordinance: 1. A minimum of 50% of the gross townhome land area shall be reserved as common open space for townhomes. Per City Code Section 1102.13(4) of the Shoreland Planned Unit Development ordinance: (d) Open space requirements. Planned unit developments must contain open space meeting of the following criteria: 1. At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. Staff Comments: 1. The townhomes shall have at least 50% common open space. 2. The overall development shall have at least 50% open space. Existing Conditions 5 Per the Wetland Delineation Report, the site consists primarily of row crop land with scattered farmed wetlands. A single-family home and outbuildings are located along the west central border. Wooded areas with wetlands/drainageways are in the southwest and southeast portions of the site. Topography on the site varies with high elevations at ~910 to 912 ft MSL and low elevations at ~902-904 ft MSL. A 70ft wide transmission line runs north-south through the site. A 50ft wide drainage & utility easement and stormwater pipe runs west-east through the site. Approximately the west quarter of the development is in the Shoreland Management Overlay District of Peltier Lake. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use Direction Zoning Current Land Use 2040 Future Land Use North R, Rural Rural Residential Urban Reserve South R, Rural and City of Centerville Rural Residential and single family dwellings Medium Density and City of Centerville East PUD (Watermark Development) Residential Low Density Mixed West Peltier Lake Peltier Lake Peltier Lake Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment The 125 acre site has three (3) land use designations per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan: low density, medium density, and high density. The areas are not intended to be strict land use and density boundaries but should be considered somewhat flexible to accommodate development. Met Council requires a formal comprehensive plan amendment to adjust the land use boundaries. The proposed amendment slightly decreases the allowed number of housing units; however, the proposed development of 246 units falls within both ranges. Existing Comp Plan Proposed Comp Plan Range of Allowed # of Housing Units 209-322 150-247 Staff Comment: 6 1. The existing and proposed comprehensive plan amendment maps shall only subtract out the Wetlands & Water Bodies, Arterial ROW, and Electric Transmission Line Easement. After receiving revised maps, the City will distribute to affected jurisdictions for their 60 day comment period. Planning District #3 Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the site is in Planning District #3. The Comprehensive Plan states: • Land Use o Much of District 3 was included in the I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) completed in 2005. o All development within the AUAR study area must comply with the mitigation plan that forms a part of the AUAR. Density The following chart is a summary of the site’s general housing unit range and density using Met Council’s density formula: Gross Area Public Public Open Space/ Arterial Electric Net Density Range Units Land Use Acres Wetlands Park Wetland Buffers ROW Transmission Line Area Low High Low High Low Density 82.35 4.11 5.37 10.55 0.98 2.40 58.94 1.6 3.0 94 177 Medium Density 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 4.60 4.0 6.0 18 28 High Density 37.89 9.62 0.00 12.96 3.58 0.55 11.18 6.0 8.0 67 89 125.02 13.73 5.37 23.51 4.56 3.13 74.72 180 294 The range of allowed housing units for the entire site is 180 to 294. The proposed 246 housing units meets the allowed the density range. The development’s overall net density is 3.29 units per acre. Growth Management Strategy Page 3-17 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan details the City’s Growth Management Strategy. The strategy works in conjunction with the City’s utility staging plan. 7 The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5- year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. From 2010 to 2024, the City’s average annual number of units is 123. This is less than the allowed 230 unit annual allocation. With existing projects underway, this project will be phased over multiple years to meet growth management requirements. The Phasing Plan is detailed later in this report. Current Zoning and Land Use Current Zoning R, Rural Current Land Use Agricultural Future Land Use per 2040 Comp Plan Low Density, Medium Density, High Density Utility Staging Area Stage 1A (2018-2025) Stage 1B (2025-2030) Rezoning The property is currently zoned R, Rural. The R, Rural zoning is a holding district until municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and the property owner is interested in having the property developed. The property would need to be rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development to allow for zoning and shoreland district flexibility. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. The purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be departed from to accomplish public value purposes. The underlying conventional zoning districts used for this project are: Underlying Conventional Zoning Districts Housing Product R-1, Single Family Residential 80ft wide lots R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft and 65ft wide lots 8 R-3, Medium Density Townhomes A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. Conventional Zoning District Guidelines and PUD Flexibility Lot Width and Lot Sizes The attached PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district requirements. The chart also compares the proposed development to these guidelines and where PUD flexibility is requested. Per City Code Section 1001.098 of the Subdivision Ordinance: (1) Area. The minimum lot area, width and depth shall not be less than that established by the Lino Lakes Zoning Chapter in effect at the time of adoption of the final plat. Minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that encumber lot development. Staff Comments: 1. Several lots do not meet these requirements. Lot areas, spreadsheet, and plan sheets shall be revised accordingly. Setbacks The following charts compare the conventional City ordinance requirements to the proposed setbacks. Residential Single Family City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Street ROW R-1 = 30ft R-2 = 25ft 30ft 25ft No Rear Lot Line R-1 = 30ft R-2 = 25ft 30ft 25ft No Side Lot Line R-1 & R-2 = 5ft garage/ 10ft house 80ft: 10ft and 10ft 55-65ft: 7.5 ft/7.5 ft No Yes 9 Townhomes R-3 City Ordinance Requirement Proposed Setbacks PUD Flexibility Required? Local Street Arterial Street 30ft 40ft 25ft 40ft Yes No Private Street (from back of curb) 25ft 25ft No Rear Lot Line 30ft 25ft Yes Side Lot Line 10ft 10ft No From Low Density Res 35ft 25ft Yes Shoreland Management Overlay District A portion of the development is within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of Pelter Lake which is classified as a natural environment lake. Within the shoreland district, land is guided both low density and medium density. Single family dwellings are allowed in the shoreland district. These lots are non-riparian because they do not directly abut the lake due to Peltier Lake Drive and a strip of land owned by the Board of Water Commission-St. Paul. The townhomes are not in the shoreland district and therefore are not subject to shoreland PUD requirements. Lot Width and Lot Sizes The attached PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulation Chart that summarizes lot width, lot depth and lot sizes requirements. The shoreland ordinance allows for a minimum 80ft wide single family lots, two-family/duplex and triplex/quad/townhomes. The development proposes single family detached dwellings within the shoreland district; however, some of the single family lots are 65ft wide x 125ft deep. The two- family/duplex requirements are a minimum lot size of 8,775 sf and 130ft lot width. This would equate to a single family lot 65ft wide x 135ft deep = 8,775sf. There are no townhomes proposed within the shoreland district. The 65ft wide lots meet the 135ft depth requirement. No PUD flexibility is required for lot width or lot size in the shoreland district. Setbacks The setback from the OHWL 884.7 EL is 150ft. This setback would only be applicable to Lot 1, Block 2 near Peltier Lake and the setback requirement is met. Impervious Surface Coverage 10 Per City Code Section 1102.07(1)4, the impervious surface coverage of single family lots in the district must not exceed 30%. Single family lots outside the shoreland district are allowed up to 65% maximum impervious surface. Staff and the applicant are working with MNDNR to come up with one impervious surface percentage that can be applied to all lots. Building Design Standards and Other Performance Standards City Code Section 1007.043 details minimum residential building design standard requirements. The conventional residential zoning districts also provide addition requirements. Single Family-80ft wide lots All single family dwelling detached dwellings shall the minimum zoning ordinance requirements of City Code Section 1007.043(2)(a) and City Code Section 1007.110 (R-1, Single Family Residential District). There are 22 different house products proposed. Single Family-65ft wide lots The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility from the following building requirements of City Code Section 1007.112 (R-2, Two Family Residential): Required Requested PUD Flexibility Garage Forward of Front Porch 0 ft 2ft to 6ft Garage/Façade Ratio 50%/50% 2 story home: 55% garage/45% facade 1 story home: 67% garage/33% façade There are 127 different house products proposed. Single Family-55ft wide lots The developer is requesting PUD flexibility from the following building requirements of City Code Section 1007.043(2)(a) and City Code Section 1007.112 (R-2, Two Family Residential): Required Requested PUD Flexibility Min. Building Footprint (less garage area) 850sf 780sf Garage Size 520sf 445ft min 11 Garage Forward of Front Porch 0ft 1ft to 6ft Garages over 2 stalls 2ft recess 1ft recess Garage/Façade Ratio 50%/50% 2 story home: 55% Garage/45% Facade There are 109 different house products proposed. Townhomes The developer is requesting PUD flexibility from the following building requirements of City Code Section 1007.043(2)(b) and City Code Section 1007.113 (R-3, Medium Density Residential): Required Requested PUD Flexibility Garage Width 20sf 18ft 1.5in (Row TH) 18ft 7.5in (Back to Back TH) Garage Size 520sf 379ft (Row TH) 405ft (Back to Back TH) Combined Area Exterior Finish (Brick or Stone) 25% 7% (Row TH) 8% (Back to Back TH) Max. Single Wall Lap Siding Exterior Finish 75% 85% rear & side (Row TH) 94% side (Back to Back TH) Staff Comments: 1. The row townhome end units abutting public streets shall incorporate the higher architectural standards as shown on Colonial Manor Patriot-CMS Sheet A3 dated March 1, 2022. All Housing Units (Single Family and Townhomes) Staff Comments: 1. An anti-monotony plan is required with final plat submittal. 2. A minimum 6 inch window trim is required on all front elevations. 3. A minimum 4 inch window trim is required on all side and rear elevations. 4. All garage doors shall be decorative and have a strip of windows. Subdivision Ordinance Blocks and Lots The proposed development provides a mix of residential lots and blocks. Outlots contain wetlands, buffers, stormwater ponds etc. 12 Lot or Outlot Purpose Ownership Lots and Blocks Single Family Home & Townhomes Private A Open space and stormwater pond HOA B Open space, wetland buffer, stormwater ponds, trail corridor HOA C Open space, stormwater pond, trail corridor HOA D Open space, wetland buffer, stormwater ponds, trail corridor HOA E Open space, wetland buffer, stormwater ponds, trail corridor HOA F Future Development Private G-DD Townhomes, Private Drives and Private Open Space HOA EE Public Park City FF Public Park City Staff Comments: 1. During PUD Concept Plan review, staff noted the property owner’s lot at 7566 Peltier Lake Drive should be incorporated into the plat. This was not done. Outlot F is proposed to be sold to the property owner for future development. Staff notes future development will need to meet all land use, density, zoning, subdivision, shoreland, etc. ordinances. Streets and Alleys-Public Streets CSAH 54 (20th Ave N) is an A-Minor Arterial Reliever road. Seventy-five (75) feet of road right-of-way is being dedicated along CSAH 54. Internal streets consist of local streets with 60ft wide road right-of-way and paved 32ft wide back to back. Sidewalks are provided along the streets. Peltier Lake Drive will be relocated to the east and serve as the north-south street connection. The public right-of-way will remain and a trail installed to provide public enjoyment of the lake amenity. Street G road right-of-way abuts the property to the south for future extension. A temporary roadway easement 24ft wide will connect to the existing Peltier Lake Drive. Staff Comments: 13 1. A temporary roadway easement from Street G to existing Peltier Lake Drive shall be recorded. Streets and Alleys-Private Streets Private streets are proposed for the townhomes. City Code Section 1007.054 details private street regulations. The following regulations do not appear to be met: (b) The private street shall not exceed 300 feet in length unless it forms a continuous connection or loops back to a public street. A private street over 150 feet in length that does not form a continuous connection or loop back to a public street shall provide a turn-around at or near its terminus, in compliance with City General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates. (d) The private street shall gain access from the public street and shall maintain the street drainage with concrete curb and gutter per City Standard Specifications for Construction. Private street access on urban and rural streets shall have at a minimum a five-foot bituminous or concrete apron. The remainder of the private street shall be designed, constructed and surfaced as approved by the City Engineer. (e) The private street shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide. No parking shall be allowed on the private street, however, guest parking spaces may be required to be installed adjacent to the private street, as determined by the City Council. Staff Comments: 1. All private streets shall meet City Code Section 1007.054 requirements. 2. Per City Code Section 1007.052(6) Off-Street Parking: Townhouses and Manufactured Home Parks require 2 rent-free spaces per unit. In projects involving 8 or more units, guest parking at a rate of 1 space per 3 units shall be provided. a. Guest parking spaces shall be provided. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements at least 10 feet wide have been provided along all lot lines. Drainage and utility easements are also dedicated over Outlots A-E over stormwater management facilities. Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control The site is located within the NE Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan area and is subject to requirements of the plan. As part of the plan implementation the City constructed a trunk storm sewer pipe across the southern half 14 of the property between 20th Avenue and Peltier Lake. This trunk line serves as the major conveyance system for the area. The grading plan shows ten (10) stormwater ponds throughout the development. They are part of the multi-purpose greenway corridor incorporating trails, stormwater management, floodplain, ditches, and open space. Per the City Engineer memo dated July 3, 2025: Stormwater management for the Peltier Ponds site consists of multiple sedimentation basins and irrigation reuse to provide treatment. Additional stormwater management requirements are set beyond standard City and RCWD rules based on the site’s location within the Northeast Drainage Area Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP). Based on City interpretation of the CSMP, it appears the design is generally compliant with these requirements, though additional information is requested. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 28.35 67.29 162.34 N/A Proposed 24.81 57.29 127.92 N/A Trunkline – 0.1 cfs/acre N/A N/A 3.39 N/A Trunkline – Proposed N/A N/A 2.49 N/A The City Engineer’s memo contains a list of comments that need to be addressed. Public Utilities Public water, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will be installed within the development. The site is in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub-district 3H). Flow from these areas, including that from Centerville, is collected along East Cedar Street and conveyed east to MCES Meter M220 and Gravity Interceptor 802325. The site is in Utility Staging Area 1A (2018-2025) and 1B (2025-2030). By resolution, the Council may move the parcels from Stage 1B (2025-2030) to Stage 1A (2018-2025). 15 Per the City Engineer’s memo, the City’s water supply system well firm capacity should meet or exceed its maximum day demand. This criteria is currently constrained by poor water quality in some wells, the White Bear Lake court orders and ongoing litigation, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors. The City’s existing firm capacity (excluding Well No. 2 due to poor water quality) is 4.38 million gallons per day (MGD). The City’s maximum day demand from 2015 to 2024 was 3.87 MGD. Near- term development within the City is projected to increase the maximum day demand by 0.42 MGD, bringing it to 4.29 MGD. The City is actively pursuing Well No. 7 to increase firm capacity, but it will likely not be in service until the fall of 2026. Based on the wide annual variability in maximum day demand and its susceptibility to drought conditions, the City will continue to monitor water demands and reserves the right to impose water restrictions and to reevaluate water supply capacity prior to Peltier Phases 3 and 4. The City has begun conversations with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) about permitting Well No. 7 and is awaiting confirmation whether it can be constructed at this time given the ongoing White Bear Lake litigation. The site will implement a stormwater reuse system for irrigation purposes. Staff Comments: 1. Based on projected water use, the initial phase of development can be accommodated by the City’s system prior to development of Well 7. As the water issue continues to develop it may impact the City’s ability to service future phases of the development. In such case future phases of the development may be deemed premature. Yield Plan As required per City Code Section 1001.041(2)(a)7, the applicant submitted the attached yield plan. The yield plan shows the maximum number of dwelling units that would be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and other requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning and Subdivision Chapters. The submitted yield plan indicates single family lots, townhomes and an apartment totaling 319 housing units. The proposed preliminary plat contains 246 housing units. Phasing Plan The phasing plan indicates four (4) phases of development. 16 Phase 1 83 lots Phase 2 50 lots Phase 3 34 lots Phase 4 79 lots Total 246 lots Staff Comment: 1. Outlot EE shall be dedicated as public park with the Phase 3 development. 2. The timing of trail construction shall be evaluated with each phase. 3. As water issue continues to develop it may well impact the City’s ability to service future phases of the development. Traffic Study A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Traffic Impact Group, LLC dated April 22, 2025. Per the study, • The proposed new development is expected to generate 41 entering trips and 122 exiting trips in the AM peak hour, and 132 entering and 81 exiting trips in the PM peak hour. • Total daily trip generation is 2,308. • A northbound left-turn lane shall be constructed on 20th Avenue and Watermark Way • A traffic signal or roundabout is not warranted at 20th Avenue and Watermark Way Existing Roadways The following roadways were analyzed: • 20th Avenue N (CSHA 54) = A Minor Reliever • Watermark Way = local street • Rehbein Street = local street o Gordon Avenue is an existing street stubbed to the development site and connects to Rehbein Street Level of Service Level of Service (LOS) is used to describe the operating conditions of an intersection. Facilities are given letter designations from “A” (best operating conditions) to “F” (worst conditions). City Code Section 1001.013(2)(c), Premature Subdivision of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance establishes minimum Level Of Service (LOS) requirements. The ordinance states that if the LOS is A or B, the proposed subdivision shall not the degrade the LOS 17 more than one grade. If the LOS is C or D, it shall not degrade the LOS. Intersections with a LOS of E or F must be improved to ensure a LOS of D or better. Existing Peak Hour LOS 2026 Full Build Peak Hour LOS Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak 20th Ave N & Rehbein St -EB A B B B -WB B B B C 20th Ave N & Watermark Way -EB na na B B -WB LT-B RT-A LT-B RT-A LT-C TH-A RT-A LT-C TH-B RT-A -NB Free Free Free Free -SB LT-A LT-A LT-A LT-A The proposed Levels of Service do not degrade by more than one (1) LOS. Staff Comments: 1. The project was also reviewed by Anoka County Highway Department. The County prefers a roundabout at 20th Avenue N and Watermark Way. This shall be further evaluated by the applicant, City and County. 2. The City Engineer memo details additional information that is needed before they can be determined if City requirements are met. Noise Study A Traffic Noise Assessment was completed by David Braulau Associates, Inc. dated May 9, 2025. Minnesota Rule 7030.0040 details noise standards for residential land uses: 18 L10 is the level exceeded 10% or 6 minutes of an hour. L50 is the level exceeded 50% or 30 minutes of an hour. Predicted daytime L10 levels at living units closest to the highways are below the 65 dBA daytime residential standard. Predicted nighttime L10 levels at living units are slightly above the nighttime standards in 2026 but 4 to 5 dBA above the standards in 2040. However, residential land uses can be brought into compliance with state rules if appropriate STC rated windows are installed. An analysis of exterior facades shows that STC 28 will comply with the standards for most rooms although several models with extensive glazing may require STC 30 glazing to comply with the standards. Staff Comments: 1. All single family and townhome unit windows, patio doors, etc. adjacent to 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) shall be constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30dB(A) as detailed in the noise study. a. Window areas shall require a minimum STC 30 glazing. Parks, Greenways and Trail Plan The Park Board reviewed the PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat on July 7, 2025. Comments were not available at the time this staff report was prepared but will be presented at the Planning & Zoning Board meeting. Figure 10-2 of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan identifies the need for a future Neighborhood Park Area F centrally located within the service area. The proposed development includes 5.37 acres of public park and paved trails. A mowed/turf trail is also proposed in the southeast quadrant of the site. The trails are located adjacent to the wetlands, stormwater ponds and open space creating a multi-functional greenway corridor. Peltier Lake Drive will be relocated to the east and serve as the north-south street connection. The public right-of-way will remain and a trail installed to provide public enjoyment of the lake amenity. Staff Comments: 1. Only land that is reasonably suitable for park use and location shall be credited for parkland dedication. 2. A trail shall be constructed along CSAH 54 (20th Ave N.) from Rehbein Street to Watermark Way. 19 3. Trail corridors shall be a minimum 30-40 feet in width above the high water level. 4. The total linear footage of paved trails shall be provided. Tree Preservation Per the June 25, 2025 Environmental Board staff report, a Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan will be required for existing trees that are proposed to be removed. The area has been farmed and few desirable trees exist within this area. On the northern end of the project tree removal should be limited to provide screening from existing houses on the south side of Rehbein St. The southwest corner of the property has trees that are shown for removal. These areas appear to be outside of the basic use area and will require mitigation. Provide calculations in future submittals showing the basic use area for the property and areas of environmentally sensitive areas. Boxelder is being shown as undesirable and no mitigation is being provided. Cottonwoods and Ash trees can be considered undesirable as defined in the development standards. However, boxelder should be mitigated for, 116 boxelder are being removed outside of the Basic Use Area. Tree removals should be broken down between Non-Basic Use Area and any Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). Currently trees are just shown outside of the basic use area, it appears that there will be removals within the ESA of wetland. Landscaping Also from the Environmental Board staff report, boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family and two-family lots. Townhomes and multi-family properties require one tree per 70 feet of linear feet of road frontage. Open areas shall be landscaped to meet requirements of 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 SF. Open space calculations should be provided with future submittals. Landscape screening and buffers shall be installed along CSAH 54/20th Street. Buffer screening and berming should meet the city’s 6’ height requirement from the low point of foundation. The landscape plans shall comply with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards of the zoning ordinance. No recommendations for additional plantings were called out during the noise study. Mitigation for the townhomes should meet the requirements of the noise study. 20 EQB Environmental Review The development is in the I-35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) which was completed in 2005 and subsequently updated through 2020. The 2025 update is currently in process. All development within the study area must comply with the AUAR mitigation plan. Additional information as noted in this staff report is required to determine compliance. Wetlands Per the April 17, 2025 wetland replacement application, there are nineteen (19) wetlands totaling 15.58 acres on the project site. A majority of the wetlands (13) are shown within the currently farmed area of the parcel. These wetlands are considered degraded and have a lower biological value. There are 1.47 acres of wetland impacts that will be mitigated via wetland bank credits. Only Wetlands 14, 15, 16, and 17 in the southeast quadrant require Wetland Management Corridor (WMC) minimum 50ft wide buffer with site development. This has been provided (10 acres). Additional conservation easements/buffers (15 acres) are provided around the other wetlands and stormwater ponds. Total protected public open space is 25 acres. Protected Open Space Area signage will also be installed. Staff Comments: 1. Conservation easements and wetland buffers shall be recorded over the applicable open space outlots. Floodplain The 2015 FEMA Floodplain Map indicates Zone A flood plain over the large wetland on the south side of the site. The Base Flood Elevation (BFE) is 887.7. There are no floodplain impacts. Staff Comments: 1. The Base Flood Elevation shall be shown on the preliminary plat. Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments • Anoka County Highway Department comments are provided in the attached letter. • Lino Lakes Police Department reviewed the development and had no public safety concerns. 21 • Lino Lakes Fire Department notes the need for temporary cul de sacs on future street extensions and a future north-south street connection from Gordon Avenue to Peltier Lake Drive/Old Mill Road. • City Engineer comments are provided in the attached memo. • Environmental Board comments are provided in the attached memo. • Park Board reviewed the preliminary plat on July 7, 2025. Comments were not available at the time of this staff report. Staff will present their recommendations at the Planning & Zoning Board meeting. • The developer held a neighborhood meeting on May 20, 2025. A meeting summary is attached. PUD Public Benefit vs PUD Flexibility Summary Summary Public Benefit Gained: 1. Variety of housing types and lot sizes from larger single family lots to townhomes. 2. Life-cycle housing. 3. Multi-functional greenway corridor, trail, and storm water management system. 4. Greater protection of lake and wetland natural resources with extensive stormwater management plan and larger wetland buffers. 5. Transition from low intense residential development near natural resource/lake to higher intense development near arterial roads. 6. Efficient use of land and private streets resulting in smaller network of utilities and streets. 7. Creation and preservation of open space that is accessible to the public. 8. Creation of trail corridor along Peltier Lake that is accessible to the public. 9. More parkland dedication fees available for park development. 10. Wider landscape buffers and trail corridors. 11. Increased side yard setbacks from 5ft to 10ft on 80ft wide lots. Flexibility Provided: 1. Detached 65ft wide single family lot vs. two-family lots in shoreland district 2. Lot widths: 55ft wide single family lots < 60ft wide R-2 requirement 3. Corner lot widths: 72.5ft wide < 75ft wide requirement 4. Lot size: 6,875sf < 7,500 sf R-2 requirement 5. Side yard setbacks: a. 7.5ft < 10ft for 55ft and 65ft wide single family lots. 6. Townhomes: a. Street lot line setback: 25ft < 30ft b. Rear lot line setback: 25ft < 30ft 22 c. Low density residential setback: 25ft < 35ft required 7. Building design standards: a. Single Family R-2 (55ft and 65ft wide lots): i. Minimum building footprint: 780sf < 850sf ii. Garage size: 445sf < 520sf iii. Garage protrusion from front porch: 6ft > 0ft iv. Garage/façade ratio: 1. 2 story home: 55% garage/45% facade > 50%/50% 2. 1 story home: 67% garage/33% façade > 50%/50% v. 3rd stall recess: 1ft < 2ft required b. Townhomes (R-3) i. Garage width: 18ft 1.5in < 20ft ii. Garage size: 379sf < 520sf iii. Exterior stone: 7% < 25% iv. Max. singular exterior finish: 85% (rear) and 94% (side) > 75% allowed RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing for Peltier Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat to allow time to address the outstanding issues including but not limited to: • Comprehensive plan amendment • Transportation • Water supply concerns • Impervious surface percentage • Architectural standards • Cultural resources assessment Staff seeks input on the following items: 1. Requested PUD flexibility regarding building design standards? 2. Other requested PUD flexibility? The following is one consideration for preliminary conditions of approval: 1. Preliminary Plat approval is conditioned on the City’s ability to provide water as determined by the City. The following items shall be addressed with the submittal of the revised PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat: 23 1. All staff comments as noted in this staff report. 2. All additional attached staff and agency comments. 3. All plan sheets: a. A trail shall be provided from Outlot EE (public park) to Outlot FF (public park). b. A trail shall be provided along the north side of Blocks 13 and 14 to 20th Avenue. i. A minimum 30ft-40ft wide trail corridor consistent with RCWD ditch easement shall be provided. c. A trail shall be provided along 20th Avenue from Rehbein Street to Watermark Way intersection. d. Monument sign location shall be shown. e. All trail corridors shall be a minimum 30-40ft wide. 4. Revise Existing and Proposed Comprehensive Plan Maps: a. Subtract out the Wetlands & Water Bodies, Arterial ROW, and Electric Transmission Line Easement to determine the Net Areas and required ranges. b. The proposed Resulting Density Ranges shall meet the Required Density Range for each land use category. 5. Land Use & Density Plan: a. Do not subtract out stormwater ponds for density calculations. b. The areas in the Proposed Land Use Comp Plan Analysis table shall be the same as the areas in the Legend table. 6. Add to Master Plan Booklet: a. Land Use & Density Plan b. Parks and Open Space Plan i. Include linear feet of paved trail and grass trail 7. Sheet C2.4, Preliminary Plat: a. Lot 3, Block 4: A minimum 10ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland. Wetland cannot be in lot. 8. Sheet C4.4, Grading & Drainage Plan: a. A temporary cul de sac shall be installed at the north end of Street H. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Applicant’s Narrative 3. Master Plan Booklet 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Land Use & Density Plan 6. Yield Plan 7. Ghost Plat 8. Architectural Color Rendering Examples-55ft 9. Architectural Color Rendering Examples-65ft 24 10. Architectural Color Rendering Examples-80ft 11. Architectural Color Rendering Examples-TH 12. PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart 13. PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart 14. Neighborhood Meeting Minutes 15. City Engineer Memo dated July 3, 2025 16. Environmental Memo dated June 25, 2025 17. Anoka County Letter dated June 26, 2025 18. Phasing Plan Peltier Lake Dr Rehbein StGordon Ave Peltier Lake Dr Old Mill Ct Rehbein St Fores t L n W ater m ark W a y 54 Legend Parcels December 5, 2024 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 500 Ft Peltier Ponds Site Location & Aerial Map NARRATIVE: Peltier Ponds - Single-Family & Townhome Residential Community U.S. Home, LLC, dba Lennar, is pleased to submit this application for a proposed single-family and townhome community composed of 246 homes. Existing Conditions The property is located on the west side of 20th Ave N (CSAH 54) across from Watermark, east of Peltier Lake Drive, and north of the Centerville city border. The site is 125.02 gross acres (64.32 net developable acres) in size and is currently farmed agricultural land with wetlands and pockets of wooded upland and lowland. The site is currently guided Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential. Nineteen wetlands have been delineated on the site totaling 15.66 acres in size. Guided Land Uses and (current use of land) surrounding the subject property include: • North – Guided Urban Reserve (single-family residential – Rehbein’s Peltier View); • West – Guided Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Open Water (two single-family homesteads and Peltier Lake); • Southwest – Guided Medium Density Residential (50-acre single-family homestead) • South – City of Centerville (single-family residential and open space); • East – Guided Low Density Mixed Residential (20th Ave N & Watermark). Description of Requests Lennar is requesting a Rezoning of the subject property from Rural to PUD to align with the guided Land Use of the property; a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to realign the Low, Medium, and High Density Residential land use designations to match the layout of single-family homes (low density) and townhomes (medium density); and PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat applications. Proposed Homes and Architecture Peltier Ponds consists of single-family homes and townhomes similar to homes built in Watermark. CMA back-to-back townhome CMS row townhome 55-foot single-family lots 65-foot single-family lots 80-foot single-family lots Bedrooms 3 3 2 to 4 3 to 5 3 to 5 Home Sq Ft 1770-1800 1800-1900 942-2400 1920-3876 1920-3876 Garage Stalls 2 2 2 to 3 3 3 to 4 Garage Sq Ft 405 379-388 445-744 626-780 645-951 Starting Price $345,000 $365,000 $525,000 $575,000 $635,000 Concept Plan Home Count 74 39 75 49 25 262 Preliminary Plat Home Count 48 33 89 45 31 246 Home Count Difference -26 -6 +14 -4 +6 -16 Infrastructure Peltier Ponds is located adjacent to existing residential developments. As a result, infrastructure is readily available for extension to serve this development. Access for the community will be provided through the westward extension of Watermark Way and southward extension of Gordon Ave. Access will also be provided from Peltier Lake Drive on the north and south, however, Peltier Lake Drive will be moved away from the lake and redirected into the new neighborhood. Existing Peltier Lake Drive will be abandoned and possibly turned into a trail in the future. The single-family homes will be served by public streets with a curb-to-curb street width of 32 feet. The townhomes will all be served by private streets. Public Park, Open Space, Trails, and Sidewalks Lennar is proposing the dedication of 5.37 acres of land in the central area of the community and at the west edge fronting on Peltier Lake intended for use as a City park. Approximately 25 acres of the site is being preserved as public open space, and nearly 4 acres will be preserved as private open space within the townhome neighborhoods. When including the public park, ponding areas, and wetlands the site will contain 58.62 acres will be open space which constitutes 47% of the site. The community includes a network of trails that will connect to the new public park, a future lakefront trail, connection to a future trail fronting on 20th Avenue, and will allow access to the Watermark Park and trail system on the east side of 20th Avenue. Sidewalks will be constructed on one side of each public street. The public park areas will be deeded to the City and trails within the park will be maintained by the City. Common open spaces will be owned by the HOA and trails outside of park maintained by the HOA. Trees and Landscape Buffers Given the long-term agricultural use of the property, and large presence of wetlands, much of the site is void of trees. There are, however, a few large clusters of trees in the southern wetlands, along the north property line, near the homesteads by the lake, and around the creek in the center of the site where the park is proposed to be located. There was a total of 2,186 trees were inventoried. Lennar is proposing the removal of 371 trees from the site, which means 83% will be preserved. Lennar will be planting trees in accordance with City Code requirements. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goals The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan guides the subject properties Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential. This is a complicated site to design to meet density requirements given the scattered location of wetlands and the need to provide ponding, but PUD zoning would provide the flexibility to offer the proposed mix of townhomes and three base lot width standards for the single-family homes to achieve the density required by the Comp Plan. The proposed plan meets the overall required density unit range requirements based on existing and proposed land use designations. However, the land use designations are being amended to align with the proposed housing types (single-family = low density residential; row townhomes = medium density residential; back-to-back townhomes = high density residential). Along with 34.25 acres being preserved in park/open space, the preservation of wetlands and trees, and the creation of a public park, the proposed community aligns with goals outlined in the Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan. PELTIER PONDS USING EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Land Use Required Density Range (units/acre) Net Acres Density Range Proposed Units Resulting Density (units/acre) Low Density Residential 1.6 - 3.0 27.57 44 - 83 77 2.79 (within density requirements) Medium Density Residential 4.0 - 6.0 27.68 111 - 166 124 4.48 (within density requirements) High Density Residential 6.0 - 8.0 9.07 54 - 73 45 4.96 (below density requirements) 64.32 209 - 322 246 3.82 (within density range) PELTIER PONDS USING PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Land Use Required Density Range (units/acre) Net Acres Density Range Proposed Units Resulting Density (units/acre) Low Density Residential 1.6 - 3.0 51.96 84 - 156 165 3.17 (exceeds density requirements) Medium Density Residential 4.0 - 6.0 4.60 19 - 28 33 7.21 (exceeds density requirements) High Density Residential 6.0 - 8.0 7.76 47 - 63 48 6.18 (below density requirements) 64.32 150 - 247 246 3.82 (within density range) PELTIER PONDS USING YIELD PLAN Land Use Required Density Range (units/acre) Net Acres Density Range Proposed Units Resulting Density (units/acre) Low Density Residential 1.6 - 3.0 31.49 51 - 95 78 2.83 (meets density requirements) Medium Density Residential 4.0 - 6.0 30.44 122 - 183 168 6.07 (meets density requirements) High Density Residential 6.0 - 8.0 10.49 63 - 84 73 8.04 (meets density requirements) 72.42 236 - 362 319 4.96 (within density range) Goal 1: Create a unified vision and future for the city, promote a well-planned community, prevent fragmented development, address the impacts of development and redevelopment on natural resources, aesthetics and view corridors, and provide balanced land use and connectivity that ensures the integration of both sides of the regional park. • Preserving open space, providing park dedication and trails, and/or providing stormwater management areas, in excess of minimum standards to implement the Greenway System and Rice Creek Watershed District’s Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan. • Restoring/enhancing ecological systems. • Managing stormwater using natural filtration and other ecologically based approaches. • Providing life-cycle and affordable housing. Peltier Ponds will be preserving 34.25 acres of upland open space (58.62 acres of open space if ponding and wetland areas were included) which is 47% of the site. This plan proposes the dedication of a 5.37-acre park at the west side of the community near Peltier Lake. Of the 15.66 acres of wetland located on the site 13.73 acres will be preserved along with the creation of 6.03 acres of wetland buffers. Five of the wetlands (2.44 acres combined) on site are being restored from their current farmed agricultural state to revitalized wetlands. As mentioned, there will be ten (10) stormwater ponds constructed which will treat stormwater runoff prior to it entering the natural systems of wetlands, creeks, and lakes. By offering two types of townhomes and the various floorplans that can be built on 55-foot, 65-foot, and 80-foot wide lots Peltier Ponds will certainly provide Lino Lakes residents options for life-cycle housing. Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. • Link trails to parks, lakes, and schools. • Encourage pedestrian activity in residential areas by providing sidewalks and trails as well as connections to existing and future pedestrian or transit facilities. The community includes a network of trails that will connect to the new public park, a future lakefront trail, connection to a future trail fronting on 20th Avenue, and will allow access to the Watermark Park and trail system on the east side of 20th Avenue. Sidewalks will also be provided on all public streets. Goal 4: Maintain safe neighborhoods and community areas. • Develop neighborhoods with mixed housing styles that promote diversity and attract all age groups. The proposed mix of homes should attract buyers of all ages and demographics from young single first-time buyers, couples, families with children, empty-nesters, and retirees. Goal 7: Sustain Lino Lakes’ Natural Resources which make it such a desirable place to live. • Protect and preserve the natural resources throughout the city. • Continue to promote the use of Planned Unit Developments (PUD) as the city’s preferred development process to implement the Greenway System. Please see comments provided for Goal 1 and Goal 3 above. In addition, 1,815 trees will be preserved out of the 2,186 trees existing on site today (83% preserved). Many of which are located in the proposed park and open spaces. Comprehensive Plan Parks, Open Space, and Trail Goals Goal 1: Continue development and maintenance of an appropriate balance of active and passive recreational activities to serve the diverse needs of the community for people of all ages and abilities, including, where possible, neighborhood parks, larger multi-use community parks and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park). • Acquire, reserve, develop and maintain sufficient park and open space land to fulfill the identified and projected needs of the present and future populations. • Continue, whenever possible, inclusion of neighborhood parks in future developments and planned redevelopments. • Direct and manage activities in an appropriate manner by balancing the use of programming activities in the neighborhood parks. As mentioned in the response for Land Use Goal 1, this plan proposes the dedication of a 5.37- acre park near the center of the community and at the west edge with lake frontage. Goal 2: Collaborate with Anoka County to guarantee and improve public access of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park) waterways for recreational use and enjoyment of the community. • Identify, develop and maintain new public access points to area lakes and waterways so that residents can enjoy these unique recreational opportunities. There is an opportunity for the City to create and offer a new public access point to Peltier Lake at the western edge of the proposed park dedication area. Goal 3: Develop, maintain and connect the current and proposed trails and greenway systems in the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve (Regional Park) in a manner that preserves and sustains the natural environment. • Preserve the open character of Lino Lakes through the preservation of natural open space and the establishment of greenway corridors. • To the extent possible, require an interconnected trail system to be developed concurrently with the infrastructure of the subdivision or new development. Please see comments provided for Land Use Goal 3 above. Goal 4: Identify, protect and preserve the desirable natural areas and ecological and aquatic resources of the community. • Where possible, restore damaged or misused natural and ecologically significant areas to their original state. • Require natural space buffers, where appropriate, around wetlands to preserve their function and value. Please see wetland comments provided for Land Use Goal 1 above. Goal 5: To provide city residents with parks, trails, greenways and natural areas for protection of the natural environment, recreational uses, as visual/physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban development, and as a means to maintain the character, ambiance, appearance and history of the community. • The city shall reserve the right to acquire land within all development areas for park, natural open space, greenways and trail purposes. • Parkland dedication policies and ordinances shall be used by the city to require each developer (of all land use categories) to dedicate land, or at the discretion of the city provide a payment in lieu for all or part, for parks, trails, greenways and open space acquisition and development. • Alternatives to direct acquisition of property, such as conservation easements, shall be used where appropriate to set aside land for park and open space purposes. Please see comments provided for Land Use Goal 1 and Goal 3 above. The proposed open spaces would be placed under conservation easements. Goal 7: Identify important existing natural resources for protection and work cooperatively with developers and landowners to encourage healthy natural resource systems to retain the existing natural character of the community through education. • Encourage the preservation of natural vegetation including plants of oak savannas, prairies, woodlands, wetlands and aquatic vegetation to be a design consideration for new subdivisions. As mentioned above, this plan will restore and preserve 2.44 acres of wetlands, preserve trees, and create new open spaces for natural vegetation to grow. Schedule Land development work (grading) would begin in Summer 2025 with utility/street construction getting started in Fall 2025. The overall project will likely be developed in four phases. Lennar estimates full occupancy of the community will occur approximately 5 to 6 years from the date sales begin. Lennar has a long-standing history of building successful communities throughout the Twin Cities, including similar such as Watermark (Lino Lakes), North Meadows (Blaine), and Willowbrooke (Oakdale). We invite you to visit any of these communities and our website at lennar.com/new- homes/minnesota/minneapolis-st-paul. We look forward to this opportunity to continue working with the City of Lino Lakes and thank the City for its support. Regards, Josh Metzer Land Entitlement Manager Lennar Minnesota PELTIER PONDS COMMUNITY LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 *Background Image Courtesy of National Geographic1 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 DEVELOPER LENNAR CORPORATION 16305 36th Ave. N, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 952.249.3014 SITE PLANNER / ENGINEER / SURVEYOR JAMES R. HILL, INC. 2999 West County Rd. 42, Suite 100 Burnsville, MN 55306 952.890.6044 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CALYX DESIGN GROUP 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 COLLABORATORS 2 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES REHBEIN STREETREHBEIN STREET EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WATERMARK WATERMARK DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE 3 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A K E S , M I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T H A V E N , S U I T E 1 0 0 , P L Y M O U T H , M N 5 5 4 4 6 29 9 9 W E S T C . R . 4 2 , S U I T E 1 0 0 , B U R N S V I L L E , M N 5 5 3 0 6 PH O N E : 9 5 2 . 8 9 0 . 6 0 4 4 m h a m p t o n @ j r h i n c . c o m PL A N N E R S / E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S ww w . j r h i n c . c o m Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONPROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel 1The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22,Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County,Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half ofGovernment Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesotadescribed as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14;thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of saidSection 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of TownRoad; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of TownRoad a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as apart of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2 The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota,EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to thecenterline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract herebydescribed; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thenceSouth, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more orless, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East,along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence Eastalong said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WA T E R M A R K WA T E R M A R K DE V E L O P M E N T DE V E L O P M E N T CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE REHBEIN STREETREHBEIN STREET 4 TP-1 SB-1 MAP LEGEND PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 GRADING PLAN CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WA T E R M A R K WA T E R M A R K DE V E L O P M E N T DE V E L O P M E N T CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE 5 TP-1 SB-1 MAP LEGEND PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 UTILITY PLAN CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WA T E R M A R K WA T E R M A R K DE V E L O P M E N T DE V E L O P M E N T CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE REHBEIN STREETREHBEIN STREET 6 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 PHASING PLAN | GRADING PH A S E 1 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 2 CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIAL 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WA T E R M A R K WA T E R M A R K DE V E L O P M E N T DE V E L O P M E N T CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE 7 4TH A D D I T I O N U & S 4TH A D D I T I O N U & S 3R D A D D I T I O N U & S 3R D A D D I T I O N U & S 2N D A D D I T I O N U & S 2N D A D D I T I O N U & S 1S T A D D I T I O N U & S PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 PHASING PLAN | U & S CITY OF LINO LAKESCITY OF LINO LAKES 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H 20 T H A V E N U E N O R T H PELTIER PELTIER LAKELAKE WA T E R M A R K WA T E R M A R K DE V E L O P M E N T DE V E L O P M E N T CITY OF CENTERVILLECITY OF CENTERVILLE 8 PELTIER PONDS | ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN | LEFT JUSTIFIED EXAMPLE ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN | LEFT JUSTIFIED ISOMETRIC NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY SIGN EXAMPLE NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY SIGN ISOMETRIC ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN | RIGHT JUSTIFIED EXAMPLE NOTE: CONCEPTUAL ONLY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE - CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A PERMIT 9 MAY 30TH, 2025 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 BERMING SITE SECTIONS AND PERSPECTIVES TOWNHOUSE STREET SECTION SINGLE FAMILY STREET SECTION TOWNHOUSE BERM PERSPECTIVE VEGETATED BERM VEGETATED BERM SINGLE FAMILY HOME TOWNHOUSE R.O.W. R.O.W. 20TH AVE N 20TH AVE N NOTE: TREES DEPICTED AT MATURE SIZE. TREES TO BE INSTALLED AT 6’0” HEIGHT NOTE: TREES DEPICTED AT MATURE HEIGHT. TREES TO BE INSTALLED AT 6’0” HEIGHT SINGLE FAMILY BERM PERSPECTIVE 10 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 80 FOOT WIDE LOT 65 FOOT WIDE LOT HOUSE PAD HOUSE PADHOUSE PAD SETBACK SETBACK EASEMENT EASEMENTEASEMENT SETBACK 55 FOOT WIDE LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS | SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SCALE: 1” = 15’0” 11 12 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS | TOWN HOMES HOUSE PAD GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE HOUSE PAD HOUSE PAD HOUSE PAD SETBACK SETBACK EASEMENT EASEMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SCALE: 1” = 15’0” patio patio patio patio entry entry entry entry entry entry entry entry garagegaragegarage garage garagegaragegarage garage driveway driveway driveway driveway driveway driveway driveway driveway patiopatio patio patio ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac lawn lawn lawn lawn UPRIGHT ARBORVITAE FEATHER REED GRASS YELLOW DAYLILY LOW JUNIPER DWARFHONEYSUCKLE 0 TYPICAL 8-UNIT MODEL 13 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 TYPICAL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS | TOWN HOMES NOT TO SCALE 14 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS | ROW HOMES (4-UNIT) HOUSE PADHOUSE PAD GARAGE GARAGE SETBACK SETBACK EASEMENT EASEMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SCALE: 1” = 15’0” patio patio patio patio entryentry entry entry garage garage garage garage driveway driveway driveway driveway acacacac lawn lawn lawn lawn lawnlawn lawn UPRIGHT ARBORVITAE FEATHER REED GRASS YELLOW DAYLILY LOW JUNIPER DWARFHONEYSUCKLE 0 TYPICAL 4-UNIT MODEL 15 PUD MASTER PLAN BOOKLET | MAY 30TH, 2025 TYPICAL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS | ROW HOMES (4-UNIT) NOT TO SCALE *Background Image Courtesy of National Geographic16 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 04042025 CAD FILE 24205SS1.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 C2.0 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . Parcel 1 The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel 2 The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 04042025 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . C2.1 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.2 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.3 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.4 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.5 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.6 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.7 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 CAD FILE 24205SS2.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2420500 PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A . E S 0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R LE N N A R 16 3 5 5 3 6 T + A V E N S 8 I T E 1 0 0 P L Y 0 O 8 T + 0 N 5 5 4 4 6 2 W E S T C . R . 4 2 S 8 I T E 1 0 0 B 8 R N S V I L L E 0 N 5 5 3 0 6 P+ O N E 5 2 . 8 0 . 6 0 4 4 P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S E N * I N E E R S S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . 04042025 C2.8 29 9 9 W E S T C . R . 4 2 , S U I T E 1 0 0 , B U R N S V I L L E , M N 5 5 3 0 6 PH O N E : 9 5 2 . 8 9 0 . 6 0 4 4 w w w . j r h i n c . c o m PL A N N E R S / E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PLM 7/29/24 CAD FILE 24205cp.dwg PRO-ECT NO. 24205-00 SHEET 1 OF 1 Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . PE L T I E R P O N D S LI N O L A K E S , M I N N E S O T A LA N D U S E & D E N S I T Y P L A N FO R LE N N A R The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. AND The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A. 8/14/24: Updated layout B. 8/27/24: Updated layout C. 8/28/24: Density table D. 11/11/24: Concept Revision E. 11/19/24: Land Use Plan F. 01/22/25: Rev Land Use Plan G. 02/12/25: Rev Land Use Plan H. 03/05/25: Rev Land Use Plan I. 04/04/25: Prelim Submittal 29 9 9 W E S T C . R . 4 2 , S U I T E 1 0 0 , B U R N S V I L L E , M N 5 5 3 0 6 PH O N E : 9 5 2 . 8 9 0 . 6 0 4 4 w w w . j r h i n c . c o m PL A N N E R S / E N G I N E E R S / S U R V E Y O R S 'RAWN BY 'ATE REVISIONS PLM 11/8/2024 CA' FILE 24205yield.dwg PRO-ECT NO. 24205-00 SHEET 1 OF 1 Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . LE I B E L S I T E LI N O L A K E S , M I N N E S O T A YI E L D P L A N FO R LE N N A R The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota AND The South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that certain part of the South Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, now known as the South Half of Lot 1, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 47 Revised, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 14, as the same is marked by a stone monument; thence West along the Section line for 156 feet to a point near the centerline of a public road; thence South 6 degrees West, following the general line of said public road, for 662.95 feet to the centerline of said Government Lot 1, and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence East, along said Government Lot centerline for 200.29 feet; thence South, at right angles for 180 feet; thence West at right angles for 261.71 feet, more or less, to the centerline of aforesaid public road; thence North 12 degrees 21 minutes East, along said road centerline, to aforesaid centerline of Government Lot 1; thence East along said Government Lot centerline for 22 feet to the point of beginning. AND The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described real property: That part of the North Half of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 14; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West along the North line of said Section 14 a distance of 148.88 feet to the Meander corner and the centerline of Town Road; thence South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West along said centerline of Town Road a distance of 331.55 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described; thence continuing South 5 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 84.40 feet; thence South 15 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 251.26 feet to its intersection with the South line of said North Half of Government Lot 1 as monumented; thence South 88 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East along said South line a distance of 354.76 feet; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 330.56 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 282.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Also known as a part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 47 REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 1 1 1 10+00 2+00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 18 19 20212223242526 27 0+00 27+ 6 7 1 2 0+ 0 0 2+ 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0+ 0 0 6+ 5 3 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 1 3 0+00 1 3 + 1 8 1 2 3 456789101112131415 1 6 17 18 0+ 0 0 18 + 9 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0+ 0 0 17 + 9 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 + 0 0 9+ 5 0 1 2 0 + 0 0 2+ 5 7 1 2 0+ 0 0 2+14 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 2 1 1 2 3 0 + 0 0 3 + 2 6 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 1 5 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 3 2 4 2 4 + 0 4 0+00 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 0 + 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 + 0 0 9+51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 6 0+ 0 0 1 6 + 7 0 STREET A STR E E T A S T R E E T A STREET A STREET B STREET B ST R E E T B ST R E E T B ST R E E T C STR E E T D STREET D ST R E E T E STREET ESTREET E ST R E E T F STR E E T G STR E E T G ST R E E T G S T R E E T H ST R E E T H ST R E E T H PR V T 0 1 PRV T 0 2 PRVT 03 PRVT 04 PRVT 05 PRVT 06 PRVT 07 P R V T 0 8 P R V T 0 9 P R V T 1 0 P R V T 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 20 21 22 2 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 0+ 0 0 29+11 1 2 3 0+00 3+4 4 55ft wide lots 65 ft wide lots 80 ft wide lots Row and Back to Back Townhomes PELTIER PONDS PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chart Preliminary Plat dated May 21, 2025 Based on CPA-Proposed Land Use Plan Correlating Conventional Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Zoning District Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Low Density Res R-1X, Single Family Executive single family 90 135 12,825 NA-R-1X not proposed NA R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 65 130 8,450 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 65 135 8,775 No R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 55 125 6,875 Yes R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft wide single family 60 125 7,500 55 130 7,150 Yes R-2, Two Family Residential 55ft wide single family- corner lot 75 125 9,375 72.5 125 9,063 Yes Medium Density Res R-2, Two Family Residential single family 60 125 7,500 NA-no SF dwellings proposed in Medium Density R-3, Medium Density Residential two-family 100 NA 14,000 R-3, Medium Density Residential townhomes 100 NA 24,000 826 NA 208,000 No High Density Res R-3, Medium Density Residential townhomes 100 NA 24,000 826 NA 208,000 No R-4, High Density Residential townhomes 100 NA 20,000 900 NA 232,600 No Note: Comp Plan Amendment required to change land use boundaries. Calculations based on CPA- Proposed Land Use Plan. NA-no two-family dwellings proposed in developmen Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development 7/2/2025 City of Lino LakesPUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Peltier Ponds PUD Preliminary Plan PELTIER PONDS PUD Land Use and Shoreland Regulations Chart Preliminary Plat dated May 21, 2025 Based on CPA-Proposed Land Use Plan Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot PUD Flexibility PUD Land Use Shoreland Regulations Housing Type or Use Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Width (ft)Depth (ft)Size (sf)Required? Low Density Res R-1X, Single Family Executive single family 90 135 12,825 NA-R-1X not proposed NA R-1, Single Family single family 80 135 10,800 80 135 10,800 No R-2, Two Family Residential 65ft wide single family*65 135 8,775 65 135 8,775 No *Shoreland ordinance allows for two-family/duplex with a minimum lot size of 8,775 sf and 130ft lot width. This would equate to a single family lot 65ft wide x 135ft deep = 8,775sf. ** Staff supports PUD flexibility for the 65ft wide single family lots as long as the lot depth is 135ft and shoreland lot size requirements are met. Development Standards/Guidelines Proposed Development 7/2/2025 City of Lino LakesPUD Land Use-Conventional Zoning-Shoreland-Peltier Ponds PUD Preliminary Plan PELTIER PONDS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY A Neighborhood Meeting was held on May 20th at the Watermark Amenity Center. Notices were mailed to over 120 addresses which are located within 600 feet of the subject property. Topics of discussion: • Concerns with existing drainage (or lack thereof) along the rear yards of properties located on the south side of Rehbein Street. • Plans for Peltier Lake Drive to be condemned and eventually converted to a public trail corridor. • Eventual connection of Gordon Ave to Old Mill Rd if and when the 7482 Peltier Lake Dr develops. • Access to the site via 20th Ave and Gordon Ave. • Trail and Park plans. Public vs. private. Parking facilities for the public park. • Existing and proposed stormwater drainage patterns. • Which school district the subject property lies in. • Lot sizes, housing types. • Site development construction schedule and phasing. • Home building and sales timing. • Tree removal and preservation along the north property line. • Questions if residents on Rehbein, Gordon, and 77th St will be required to connect to City sewer and water. • What will happen with exception parcels at the west edge of the proposed community. • HOA establishment, will there be private amenities. Attendees: Dan Flanagan – 1920 Rehbein St Larry Miller – 1910 Rehbein St Dan Tuomie – 1870 Rehbein St Dan & Deb Johnson – 1860 Rehbein St Dave Pecchia – 7609 Peltier Lake Dr Jill Lee – 1910 77th St E Kevin & Terry Larsen – 7625 Gordon Ave John Bender – James R. Hill Engineering Josh Metzer - Lennar 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, Lino Lakes City Planner From: Kris Keller PE, WSB Diane Hankee PE, Lino Lakes City Engineer Date: July 3, 2025 Re: Peltier Ponds Preliminary Plat Review 027404-000 WSB’s review of the Preliminary Plat for the Peltier Ponds development in Lino Lakes, MN, prepared by James R. Hill and received June 5, 2025. Our comments were made on the following documents: • Peltier Ponds - Preliminary Plat prepared by James R. Hill, dated May 21, 2025. The following review comments should be responded to in writing by the applicant. Engineering • General The Peltier Ponds development includes 125 acres between 20th Avenue (CSAH 54) and Peltier Lake, south of Rehbein Street. The preliminary plat proposes 246 units and associated infrastructure. An AUAR was prepared for this area in 2005 and the City is currently finishing the 2025 update. • Grading The Peltier Ponds Development includes site grading for the 246 units as well as extensions of Peltier Lake Drive, Gordon Avenue, Watermark Way and approximately six local streets that are yet to be named. Comments: 1. See redline comments on plans 2. Provide high points at all locations in the street and green spaces including between all lots 3. Keep swale a minimum of 5' within drainage and utility easement 4. Verify whether the berm on the north side of the development needs to be higher than the EOFs to prevent directing water to the north 5. All grading and construction in the Electric Transmission line utility easement to be approved by the utility provider a. Verify all revised clearances and cover around structures following proposed grading meet requirements 6. Verify rear grade off the back of building pads to create a more usable back yard 7. Provide EOFs for all low points in the roadway and green spaces Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 2 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review 8. All swale grades to meet minimum 2% slopes • Stormwater Management Stormwater management for the Peltier Ponds site consists of multiple sedimentation basins and irrigation reuse to provide treatment. Additional stormwater management requirements are set beyond standard City and RCWD rules based on the site’s location within the Northeast Drainage Area Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP). Based on City interpretation of the CSMP, it appears the design is generally compliant with these requirements, though additional information is requested. Existing and proposed discharge rates are summarized below. Pre- and Post- Development Discharge Rates (cfs) Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 10-Day Snowmelt Existing 28.35 67.29 162.34 N/A Proposed 24.81 57.29 127.92 N/A Trunkline – 0.1 cfs/acre N/A N/A 3.39 N/A Trunkline – Proposed N/A N/A 2.49 N/A Comments: 1. This development falls within the CSMP area and as such is beholden to additional rate control and volume reduction requirements. These volume reductions are demonstrated for flows to/through Wetland 4 and the 0.1 cfs/acre flows are demonstrated for tributary area to the 60” trunkline. Please confirm with RCWD that these are the only offsite flows with additional requirements. 2. An additional requirement for development within the CSMP is provision of more detailed water quality/reuse calculations. Please provide existing and proposed TP/TSS loading calculations for the proposed BMPs, including stormwater reuse. Additionally, please request a copy of the Reuse Design Worksheet from RCWD to quantify potential reuse volumes. 3. Provide profile plans of proposed storm sewer, including utility crossings, for more detailed review and comment. 4. Provide calculations demonstrating spread at the catchbasins is 10’ or less for the 3- year storm event. 5. Rational method pipe capacity calculations must be provided showing storm sewer is sized to convey the 10-year storm event and flow velocities are minimum 3 ft/s. 6. Confirm constructability of connecting proposed storm outlets into the existing trunkline manholes. 7. As the proposed ACD 72 ditch realignment will no longer need to provide subsurface drainage, nonperforated pipe can be specified in order to reduce loading to the tile. 8. Impervious area calculations should be based on actual site impervious, not the percentages in HydroCAD land use types. 9. Pond areas 2.5a and b should each be sized for NURP dead storage volumes separately according to their tributary areas. Pond flows only combine through Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 3 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review Wetland 10 so undersized dead storage may contribute pollutant loading to the wetland. 10. Please include node summary sheets on future HydroCAD reports so total modeled areas can be confirmed in existing and proposed conditions. 11. The 4.1X and 4X existing conditions HydroCAD subcatchment areas do not match the drainage area map. 12. The culvert modeled as 2XP/2P is a 21” CMP, not 18” RCP. 13. The outlet for 41XP/41P should be modeled with a pipe outlet, not just an orifice. 14. BMP outlet slopes should match between HydroCAD modeling and utility plans (ignoring backsloped skimmer pipes). 15. Based on the modeled results, culvert 2P will overtop Peltier Lake Dr in all storm events. Potential pipe replacement should be explored to minimize road overtopping. 16. What is the purpose of the southern node of Pond 2.6? If it is proposed to be excavated for additional onsite fill, please label it separately as a lake to be consistent with other developments in the City. 17. What is the purpose of the eastern node of Pond 4.1? If it is proposed to be excavated for additional onsite fill, please label it separately as a lake to be consistent with other developments in the City. 18. All proposed pond overflows need riprap stabilization. 19. Erosion control blankets are needed on all slopes 4:1 and steeper, including pond slopes above the OLE. 20. Review tree planting against storm sewer plans to minimize overlap and reduce potential root intrusion on storm sewer. For example, trees near the pipe between CBMH-407 – STMH-406 and CBMH-251 – FES-250 should be shifted farther from the pipe alignment. 21. Tree plantings should be removed from the 60” trunkline easement boundary to avoid potential future maintenance concerns. • Water Supply The City’s water supply system well firm capacity should meet or exceed its maximum day demand. This criteria is currently constrained by poor water quality in some wells, the White Bear Lake court orders and ongoing litigation, and annual variability in water use due to drought and other factors. The City’s existing firm capacity (excluding Well No. 2 due to poor water quality) is 4.38 million gallons per day (MGD). The City’s maximum day demand from 2015 to 2024 was 3.87 MGD. Near-term development within the City is projected to increase the maximum day demand by 0.42 MGD, bringing it to 4.29 MGD. The City is actively pursuing Well No. 7 to increase firm capacity, but it will likely not be in service until the fall of 2026. Based on the wide annual variability in maximum day demand and its susceptibility to drought conditions, the City will continue to monitor water demands and reserves the right to impose water restrictions and to reevaluate water supply capacity prior to Peltier Phases 3 and 4. The City has begun conversations with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) about permitting Well No. 7 and is awaiting confirmation whether it can be constructed at this time given the ongoing White Bear Lake litigation. Applicant to verify water pressure is adequate for all locations within the development. The watermain will need to be looped through the site and will need to include a 12-inch diameter trunk watermain stubbed to the north as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. All proposed units are required to be on the municipal water supply. Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 4 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review Based on the Estimated Daily Water Demand, which are reasonably conservative, the Peltier Ponds Development will increase the system’s average day demand by about 71,775 gallons per day (gpd). As shown on the Utility Plans, the existing 12” DIP trunk main on Watermark Way will be extended west through the development to its northern boundary similar to what is shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A 12” stub will be extended to the north towards Rehbein’s Peltier View. There will need to be a connection to the 12” watermain stub on the west side of 20th Avenue at Rehbein Street and Rainy Lane. Otherwise, the development will include a water system with predominately 8- inch diameter PVC C900 water main with 1-inch Type K copper services being extended to each lot. Water supply will need to be evaluated in conjunction with current pending DNR water appropriation approvals. Additional water stubs will be extended to the south. The south portion of the development is in the City’s Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) and would be subject to those requirements. Residential land use is consistent with the DWSMA vulnerability. Comments: 1. Avoid utility crossings where possible a. Keep watermain on west side along Gordon Ave/Street B 2. Provide utility profiles with final plat a. All utilities outside the right of way require an easement that meets a 1:1 slope with the utility invert (minimum 20') b. Show all utility crossings in profiles i. Maintain minimum 18" separation ii. Insulate when separation between storm sewer and water is less than 36" c. Identify conflicts between water, sanitary, and storm sewer mains and services 3. Locate hydrants and alter watermain such that hydrants are located at all water system highpoints a. Maintain minimum watermain cover b. Maintain hydrant coverage 4. Provide utility services per City details 5. Provide additional gate valves shown on plans 6. Provide temp hydrant/air relief/flushing, etc. on all watermain stubs 7. Keep watermain and sanitary sewer within the roadway • Sanitary Sewer As shown in the Lift Station Service Area Exhibit, sanitary sewer collection for the Peltier Ponds Development will be extended from the existing 10- inch diameter poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) trunk main on Watermark Way. The 10-inch diameter trunk main can be downsized to 8-inch at the intersection with the townhome mains as noted on the Lift Station Service Area Exhibit to assist with flushing velocities. A portion of the Development will be served by a lift station as shown in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which will be oversized to accommodate the remaining sanitary sewer district 3H. Oversizing costs for the lift station will be credited by the City. The site will otherwise be served by 8-inch diameter main along with 4-inch Schedule 40 PVC Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 5 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review service pipe to each lot. Additional sanitary sewer stubs will be extended to the north and south. Comments: 1. Further discussion will be had within Public Works whether the eastern portion of the Olson parcel to the south would be served with gravity by increasing the depth of the 8-inch main at the Peltier Ponds southern townhomes by approximately ten feet or whether it would be served by the lift station • Transportation The Peltier Ponds development will have a primary access from Watermark Way. There will be 8 local public streets (Streets A-H) added and extended as well as several private drives for the townhomes. All public streets are proposed to be 32’ back-to-back with a 60’ right of way. Final street naming will need to occur with the final plat. We have requested the additional traffic information below and cannot determine whether the current preliminary plat meets City requirements until reviewing that information. The traffic study has been reviewed and a full study with comments will be provided. Main comments include: o Figure 1 shows incorrect site plan o In Figures 4, 7, and 8: Trips are missing from the Watermark Way access. Review Watermark Traffic Study and include all trips from the 2025 Build scenario at the Watermark Way and 20th Avenue intersection. Revise analysis based on updated trips. o Add trips for the Peltier ghost plat to 2040 Build scenario o Include existing (actual or estimated) and future projected ADT for 20th Ave, Watermark Way (west and east leg), Rehbein Street (west and east leg), and Peltier Lake Drive. o Adjust access trip distribution, 75%-85% of trips are likely to use Watermark access based on site layout. o Trip calculations do not match ITE rates o Advancing and opposing volumes for right/left-turn lane analysis used incorrect volumes (and a future 2040 analysis should be completed) o 2026 and 2040 No-Build analysis is missing, this should be included to compare with the Build analysis. o Revise analysis based on updated AM/PM peak hour volumes o Revise recommendation section if improvements are needed Trails and sidewalks Trails are proposed extending from Peltier Lake in the southwest corner to the northeast corner of the development near the multifamily units as well as generally along the existing trunk storm sewer line from CSAH 54 to the center of the development. Sidewalks are shown along one side of almost all of the public streets on the preliminary plat, except for Street A, which has sidewalks on both sides from CSAH 54/20th Avenue west to Street B. With future review of the additional requested traffic information, sidewalk may be required on both sides of a larger portion of Street A. Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 6 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review The abandoned segment of Peltier Lake Drive along the lake will need to be converted to a City Trail. A City trail will need to be installed along the west side of CSAH 54 from Rehbein Street to Watermark Way. Additional trail and sidewalk segments may need to be included throughout the site at the direction of the City Planner. • Wetlands and Environment The project indicates that there are approximately 15.58 acres of wetland. A wetland replacement plan based on the impacts will need to be submitted, reviewed, and approved through RCWD and the City. A WCA application has been submitted on April 18, 2025. The site is located in the Wetland Management Corridor (WMC). Wetland buffers meeting minimum and average requirements will be required around all wetland areas following construction. Any disturbed buffer areas should be seeded with a seed mix containing native, non-invasive, species. Review of the DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System database indicates the potential presence of several protected species within and near the project area, including protected plant species. The applicant should coordinate with the DNR on the need for additional studies or surveys. The applicant will need to conduct a Cultural Resource Assessment of the development site through SHPO. • Landscaping A Landscape Plan for the Peltier Ponds development has been submitted and will be reviewed by staff and the City’s Environmental Coordinator. The Environmental Coordinator will provide separate comments. • Floodplain The southern portion of the Peltier Ponds development appears to be in FEMA Zone A and RCWD floodplain, outlines for both areas should be shown on the plans. Please confirm that any fill for the proposed pond berm and trail work does not exceed the 100 cubic yard threshold per RCWD Rule E or 1,000 cubic yard threshold per City Ordinance 1103.06. • Drainage and Utility Easements Roadways are proposed within right-of-way and lots include standard drainage and utility easements. Larger drainage and utility easements will be required to be provided over any utilities outside the right of way and any surface water management features. The western 60’ feet of CSAH 54 should be dedicated as right of way to Anoka County with it extending out to 75’ in areas for future roundabout transitions. Comments: 1. Please confirm easement intentions/needs with RCWD for the abandonment/realignment of ACD 72 through the northeast corner of the site. Will a separate easement to RCWD be provided there? Ms. Katie Larsen 07/03/2025 Page 7 Peltier Ponds Development - Engineering Review 2. The pipe run from CBMH-105 to CBMH-103 seems to exceed 10’ in depth so the easement corridor overtop must be increased from 20’ to at least double the width of pipe depth for a 1:1 trench footprint. 3. All utilities outside the right of way require an easement that meets a 1:1 slope with the utility invert (minimum 20') 4. All grading and construction in the Electric Transmission line utility easement to be approved by the utility provider • Development Agreement A development agreement will be required with the final plat. • Grading Agreement A grading agreement is not required at this time. • Stormwater Maintenance Agreement The stormwater maintenance for public facilities in the Peltier Ponds development will be covered under the City’s Programmatic Stormwater Management Agreement after the facilities have been installed and accepted by the City. Borrow areas / Lakes area will be maintained by the HOA. • Permits Required Required permits will be determined at the time of preliminary plat submittal. Potential permits may include some of the following and others: 1. NPDES General Construction Permit 2. City of Lino Lakes Zoning Permit for Grading 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit If you or the applicant have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Kris Keller at (612) 419-3083 or kkeller@wsbeng.com. You may also contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or dhankee@linolakes.us. To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator Date: June 25, 2025 Re: Environmental Comments – Peltier Ponds Environmental Board had recommended the following at their June 25, 2025 meeting: 1. Provide increased buffer widths around wetland where the trail is going past these locations. Buffers should be extended throughout the park land to provide pretreat of runoff before discharging to the wetlands. a. Show buffers in between the trail and existing channel shown on the proposed plans. b. All wetlands should be included in conservation easements. c. This area is included in the RCWD wetland corridor plan. With future submittals impacts and mitigation of wetlands will be required. i. Wetlands falling within the wetland corridor will require 50’ buffers 2. The project will disturb more than an acre of soil and will be required to obtain an NPDES permit. Proof of permit shall be required before construction. a. A SWPPP shall be required in additional submittals as required by the MPCA meeting sections 5.2-5.26 b. Final erosion and sediment control will be reviewed with future submittals c. Plans show rock construction entrance in the legend. Does not appear to be shown on the plan sheet. Call out the location on the plans. d. Redundant perimeter control will be required around all wetlands onsite where a 50’ natural buffer cannot be maintained during construction. Redundant perimeter control should be spaced 3-5’ apart. Environmental Memo Page 2 i. Legend shows heavy duty silt fence. Appears to be covering additional erosion control. Call out on plan set if two layers are to be proposed in these areas. 3. Rice Creek Watershed District shows Anoka County Ditch 72 branch 1 running through the site. Verify the location and use of the ditch with the watershed. Ditch location and drainage should be shown on the plan set if it is required to be maintained. a. Confirm with RCWD on what is allowed within the proposed new alignment of ACD 72 Br 1. Potential trail extension along this corridor to 20th could cause impacts. 4. Provide increased buffer widths around wetland where the trail is going past these locations. Buffers should be extended throughout the park land to provide pretreat of runoff before discharging to the wetlands. 5. Show buffers in between the trail and existing channel shown on the proposed plans. 6. All wetlands should be included in conservation easements. 7. This area is included in the RCWD wetland corridor plan. With future submittals impacts and mitigation of wetlands will be required. a. Mitigation banking credits have been proposed 8. Wetlands falling within the wetland corridor will require 50’ buffers 9. The project site is located with the I-35 E corridor AUAR. As part of the planning the AUAR mitigation checklist should be used. a. There are areas of potential cultural significance shown adjacent to the site and will need to complete a Cultural Resource Assessment of the proposed project. b. I35E AUAR mitigation checklist should be used with future submittals to ensure all requirements are being met. 10. Provide conservation easements over all wetland and open space in the development to ensure connectivity with existing and future development. a. Confirm ownership of outlot E and ownership and maintenance of proposed natural trails. 11. Retain 50’ wide drainage & utility easement over trunk storm sewer. Page 3 a. The 50’ buffer appears to go into outlot BB. The 50’ drainage and utility easement goes into block 26 lots 1-5. Drainage and utility easement should be outside of those lots. 12. A stormwater treatment train that filters and treats stormwater runoff as it flows through the site should be developed. Any opportunities to incorporate natural treatment systems into the project should be encouraged. 13. Use of stormwater for irrigation purposes for the site should be evaluated and if feasible required as part of site development. Larger stormwater ponds constructed for fill should be evaluated for water reuse. 14. The southern portion of the site is within the Lino Lakes drinking water supply management area. a. This area is considered moderately vulnerable, and considerations should be taken into account for the proposed project. 15. Boxelder is being shown as undesirable, and no mitigation is being provided. Cottonwoods and Ash trees can be considered undesirable as defined in the development standards. However boxelder should be mitigated for, 116 boxelder are being removed outside of the Basic Use Area. 16. Tree removals should be broken down between Non-Basic Use Area and any Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). Currently trees are just shown outside of the basic use area, it appears that there will be removals within the ESA of wetland. 17. Boulevard trees are required at the rate of one (1) tree per lot frontage for single family and two-family lots. Townhomes and multi-family properties require one tree per 70 feet of linear feet of road frontage. 18. Open areas shall be landscaped to meet requirements of 1 large tree and 2 large shrubs per 2500 SF. Open space calculations should be provided with future submittals. 19. Landscape screening and buffers shall be installed along CSAH 54/20th Street. Buffer screening and berming should meet the city’s 6’ height requirement from the low point of foundation. 20. The landscape plans shall comply with Section 1007.043 (17), Required Screening, Landscaping and Buffer Yards of the zoning ordinance. Page 4 a. No recommendations for additional plantings were called out during the noise study. b. Mitigation for the townhomes should meet the requirements of the noise study. 21. Provide a 30’ easement along Peltier Lake Drive for future trail and riparian restoration. Current plans show 30’ going down to 15’ with vacated easement. Provide clarification on ownership. 22. Provide a Blandings turtle mitigation plan. 1 1 1 1 10+00 2+00 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 18 19 20212223242526 27 0+00 27+ 6 7 1 2 0+ 0 0 2+ 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0+ 0 0 6+ 5 3 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 1 3 0+00 1 3 + 1 8 1 2 3 456789101112131415 1 6 17 18 0+ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0+ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 + 0 0 9+ 5 0 1 2 0 + 0 0 2+ 5 7 1 2 0+ 0 0 2+14 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 2 1 1 2 3 0 + 0 0 3 + 2 6 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 1 5 1 2 0 + 0 0 2 + 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 3 2 4 2 4 + 0 4 0+00 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 0 + 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 + 0 0 9+51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 6 0+ 0 0 1 6 + 7 0 STREET A STR E E T A S T R E E T A STREET A STREET B STREET B ST R E E T B ST R E E T B ST R E E T C STR E E T D STREET D ST R E E T E STREET ESTREET E ST R E E T F STR E E T G STR E E T G ST R E E T G S T R E E T H ST R E E T H ST R E E T H PR V T 0 1 PRV T 0 2 PRVT 03 PRVT 04 PRVT 05 PRVT 06 PRVT 07 P R V T 0 8 P R V T 0 9 P R V T 1 0 P R V T 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 20 21 22 2 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 0+ 0 0 29+11 1 2 3 0+00 3+4 4 4T H A D D I T I O N U & S 4T H A D D I T I O N U & S 3R D A D D I T I O N U & S 3R D A D D I T I O N U & S 2N D A D D I T I O N U & S 2N D A D D I T I O N U & S 1S T A D D I T I O N U & S 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner MEETING DATE: July 9, 2025 TOPIC: 1210 Main Street Accessory Structure Variance CASE NUMBER: VR2025-001 APPLICANT: Bruce Amdahl 8709 Mississippi Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55433 OWNER: Same INTRODUCTION The applicant and property owner of 1210 Main Street, Bruce Amdahl, submitted a Land Use Application for a variance to allow for the construction of a metal building on a lot less than 5 acres. Tentative Review Schedule: Complete Application Date: June 11, 2025 60-Day Deadline: August 10, 2025 Environmental Board Meeting: N/A Park Board Meeting: N/A Planning & Zoning Board Meeting: July 9, 2025 City Council Work Session: August 4, 2025 City Council Meeting: August 11, 2025 BACKGROUND This staff report is based on the following submittals: • Applicant Narrative • Boundary Survey prepared by Bro Land Surveying, LLC dated June 4, 2025 • Original Building Permit Application 2 • Revised Building Permit Application ANALYSIS The lot is 4.91 acres and is zoned R, Rural. On January 6, 2025, the applicant submitted a building permit application to the City to construct a 40ft x 64ft accessory building with metal panel siding with vertical orientation and exposed fasteners on the entire building. The accessory structure would be 107ft from the front lot line and 18ft from the west lot line. Per City Code Section 1007.044(10): Rural, residential and special zoning district accessory buildings. The following establishes accessory buildings requirements allowed on a property according to lot size and zoning district. For the purposes of this section, lot size for metes and bounds properties shall include roadway easements. (e) Less than five acres. 5. Metal sheet or metal panel siding with vertical orientation is prohibited. Metal horizontal lap siding is allowed. 6. Exterior walls shall be similar in appearance to standard wood or masonry residential construction. The accessory building shall be covered with shingles, tiles, or a standing seam metal roof. The building permit application was not approved because metal panel siding with vertical orientation and exposed fasteners is prohibited on lots less than 5 acres. On May 19, 2025, the applicant submitted revised building plans to construct the same size accessory building with LP wood panel siding with vertical orientation and roof shingles. On May 29, 2025, the building permit application was approved. On June 6, 2025, the applicant submitted the land use application for a variance requesting the original proposed metal building be allowed. Findings of Fact Per City Code Section 1007.018(3): (a) Criteria and findings of fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in divisions 1. through 6. below, or unless division 7. below applies. The city shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. 1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. 3 The variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of Chapter 1007: Zoning Code. Per City Code Section 1007.000(2) Intent and purposed. This chapter is adopted for the purpose of: (a) Protecting the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. (b) Dividing the City of Lino Lakes into zones and districts restricting and regulating therein the location and use of structures and land and lot size. The construction of a metal sheet or metal panel siding with vertical orientation and exposed fasteners on a lot less than 5 acres does not protect the general welfare or support the intent of regulating the use of structures based on lot size. 2. The variance shall be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The variance is consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the lot is guided Urban Reserve. Land is preserved for post-2040 urban development. Land use prior to 2040 is limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential limited to one unit per 10 acres. Accessory buildings are permitted uses. 3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. There are no practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. The applicant successfully submitted revised building plans that meet zoning requirements and was approved. The applicant notes the additional cost for metal horizontal lap siding is $25,000 more. The variance ordinance states that economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties; therefore, additional cost is not justification for approving the variance. 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. There are no circumstances unique to the property. There are several lots in the City less than 5 acres that have accessory buildings compliant with City ordinances. The applicant successfully submitted revised building plans. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would alter the essential character of the locality. Within a ¼ mile of the site, there are several rurally zoned lots less than 5 acres that do not have metal accessory buildings. 4 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Accessory structures are allowed in R, Rural zoning districts. 7. In accordance with M.S. § 462.357, Subd. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION Staff does not recommend approval of the variance request because not all six (6) applicable variance criteria are met as required. It should also be noted that construction-related businesses are not permitted uses on the property. Any home occupation shall be compliant with City Code Section 1007.056 Home Occupation Permits. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location & Aerial Map 2. Applicant’s Narrative 3. Boundary Survey 4. Original Building Permit Plan 5. Revised and Approved Building Permit Plan 1414 Legend Parcels July 1, 2025 ± Map Powered By Datafi 1 in = 300 Ft 1210 Main Street1Site /RFatiRn $eriaO MaS 1210 Main Street July 1, 2025 Map Powered By Datafi 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Boundary Survey 4. Original Building Permit Plan I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: _______________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ____________________ Date______________ Lic.No._______________ “FOR STRUCTURAL SCOPE ONLY” 40154 Wayne C. Linderman 5/22/25 Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443 (612)405-6109 LECLinderman@gmail.com www.LindermanEC.com SHINGLE ROOF LP WOOD LP WOOD SHINGLE ROOF SHINGLE ROOF SHINGLE ROOF LP WOOD LP WOOD 14 ' - 0 " 64'-0" BRUCE AMDAHL 1210 MAIN ST LINO LAKES VENT RIDGE VENT RIDGE VENT RIDGE VENT RIDGE 5/12 RHYLVH DQG ASSURYHG %XLOGLQJ PHUPLW PODQ 1 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner Michael Grochala, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: July 9, 2025 TOPIC: Draft Main Street Master Plan CASE NUMBER: N/A APPLICANT: City of Lino Lakes OWNER: N/A REVIEW SCHEDULE: N/A INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn will present the draft Lino Lakes Main Street Master Plan. BACKGROUND On July 8, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 11-24 establishing a moratorium on residential development around the Main Street corridor between Sunset and 4th Avenue. The purpose of the moratorium is to allow for the completion of a master plan and Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the area. The moratorium will end on August 15, 2025. The AUAR comment period ended on June 26th and responses to comments are currently being prepared by the project team. It is anticipated that adoption of the AUAR will be brought to the City Council for consideration on August 11, 2025. An AUAR mitigation plan will be incorporated into the Master Plan document to guide development activities. The draft Master Plan is a compilation of the process undertaken, site overview and constraints and planning considerations. The Preferred Scenario – Scenario 2, concept is more fully developed with key concepts highlighted and system plans illustrated. The plan concludes with an implementation section and appendices. The utility sections, addressing sanitary sewer and water main, are still being developed by the City Engineer. These will likely incorporate potential modifications to the utility staging plan and system routing. 2 Representatives from Kimley Horn will be presenting the plan and addressing comments received from the board. A public hearing on the Master Plan will be scheduled for the August 13th, 2025, regular Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Pending consideration and recommendation by the Board, the Master Plan would be placed on the August 25, 2025, regular council meeting for adoption. If approved staff would begin the process for amendment of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting comments from the Board on the draft plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Lino Lakes Main Street Master Plan. JULY 2, 2025 | 1 MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN DRAFT Kimley-Horn and Associates (Consultant) Rapp Strategies (Consultant) CITY OF LINO LAKES THE RESIDENTS OF LINO LAKES Anoka County Centennial School District Forest Lake School District Rice Creek Watershed District ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 2INTRODUCTION DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION - 4 Purpose of the Plan Goals and Process Relationship to Regulations and Comprehensive Plan Regional Context and Site Overview Engagement Overview BACKGROUND INFORMATION – 11 Land Use and Zoning Transportation Natural Resources and Drainage Utilities CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS – 15 Factors Influencing Planning Preliminary Planning Options Concept Planning Scenarios for AUAR (Review) Potential Development Yield Comparison PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO – 22 Overview Land Use Plan Mobility Water Management Natural Systems Park and Open Space Major Road Sections IMPLEMENTATION & NEXT STEPS – 35 INDEX – 37 AUAR Mitigation Plan Engagement Summaries 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Select Exhibits) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 DRAFT INTRODUCTION MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 4 DRAFT Mapping Northwest Main, also known as the Main Street Master Plan, outlines a vision to guide future development within a 962-acre site in the city’s northwestern corner. It also provides guidance on enhancing and conserving natural resources, as well as integrating development with adjacent neighborhoods and existing trail networks. Although this Main Street Master Plan does not select a final development plan, it will help ensure future decisions align with the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and comply with local, state, and federal regulations. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN PROCESS The City of Lino Lakes was committed to hearing from residents about their goals for the development of this area, especially those who live near or adjacent to the study area. To ensure that residents had opportunities to provide input, the city conducted a comprehensive planning process to help guide decision-making for future development. To help facilitate discussions, the city held several community open houses and one-on-one meetings with residents to hear their priorities for development in the area. Using this feedback, sketch level development scenarios were generated for discussion with two identified to be further refined and advanced forward for additional study. To ensure that development goals reflect the diverse priorities of city residents, residents were encouraged to provide input and feedback throughout the planning process. •Guide development of the area for the future •Define potential development scenarios •Outline development requirements Lino Lakes’ 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified the intersection of Sunset Avenue and Main Street as a key gateway into the community. The Comprehensive Plan recognized the need to coordinate planning activities for this large area and recommended that a Master Plan for the corridor between Sunset Avenue and 4th Avenue be completed. Residents raised important questions about potential impacts of development on the environment, infrastructure, traffic, and community identity for the area. The master plan and environmental review of this area seeks to address these questions and anticipate future impacts of development. GOALS OF THE OVERALL PLANNING PROCESS WHY WAS THIS PROCESS IMPORTANT? Screening of the Study Area: Mapping land features, including wetlands, floodplains, existing roads/trails, and easements, to assess opportunities and challenges related to development. Stakeholder Engagement: Input was collected from those who may be most likely impacted by development including nearby residents, school district leaders (Forest Lake and Centennial) and local agencies such as Anoka County Highway Department and Rice Creek Watershed District. Public Community Meetings: Three public Open House meetings were held over a few months where all residents had a chance to provide input on development goals for the area. Residents were also welcome to attend and observe City Council and Advisory Board work sessions; however, public comment was not taken at those meetings. Creation of Development Scenarios: The city used stakeholder feedback, resident input, and the initial screening of the study area to develop development scenarios. Each scenario provided a potential of what development could look like generally. Scenarios incorporated different levels of residential density, natural/ park areas, and commercial space. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR): Scenarios underwent an environmental review via the AUAR. The AUAR assessed the likely impacts of each development scenario within the area in greater detail. The review also identifies potential mitigation strategies to minimize environmental impacts. Website: Throughout the process, feedback and other planning project materials, updates and more were posted at MappingNWMain.com WHAT DID THE PROCESS INCLUDE? MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 5INTRODUCTIONDRAFT The Metropolitan Council, established by the Minnesota Legislature, serves as the regional policy-making body, planning agency, and provider of essential services in the seven-county Twin Cities metro area that includes Lino Lakes. Under state law, the Metropolitan Council must develop a comprehensive development guide every ten years for the seven-county area. This guide addresses land use (density), housing, transportation, water resources, parks, and open spaces. State law also mandates that local governments within the Metropolitan Council’s jurisdiction prepare a comprehensive plan that aligns with metropolitan system plans. RELATIONSHIP TO REGULATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 10: Parks, Greenways & Trails 10-15 Arena Acres Park Address: 519 Andall Street Classification: Neighborhood Park Size: 1 acre Description: This small neighborhood park is located within the northwestern portion of Lino Lakes that was initially developed in 1999� The park is very functionally designed with the double tennis courts adjacent to the street and a small outdated playground hidden behind the courts with no trail access� It has great potential to be a more appealing neighborhood park through improved design with improved accessibility� Existing development includes: • Playground • Basketball half court • Double tennis courts (recently taken out of commission due to poor condition) • Seating arbor Development Considerations: A master plan should explore ways to redesign the park to be more aesthetic while still accommodating appropriate uses� Connection to the proposed greenway-based trail in this area is also an important consideration� Suggested improvements include: • Determine if any tennis courts should be replaced here or if there is a more appropriate location for these amenities� Some residents in the area did indicate this is currently their only park within walking distance and enjoy the court space, but the courts may be better suited elsewhere� • Provide trail access to all key amenities within the park and link to larger trail system when it is developed� • Improve aesthetics to create a more appealing park setting� • New playground equipment� New half-basketball court when needed Cost Estimates New Development Costs: $5,000 for bituminous trail. Replacement Costs: $75,000 to $100,000 for replacement of existing amenities and basketball half court. Additional $90,000 for new tennis court, if desired, though not recommended for this site� Lino Lakes2040 Comprehensive Plan Adopted November 9, 2020 Starting with an overall understanding of the City’s vision as updated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, adopted November 9, 2020, the Main Street Master Plan team of consultants based many decisions on the information contained in the Comprehensive Plan and specifically the exhibits shown in the Index of this document. By appreciating how the Study Area fits into the goals of the larger area of Lino Lakes and the region, the planning process and steps taken, more logically fit together. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the study area as low- density residential, medium-density residential, high-density residential, planned residential/commercial, and urban reserve. The plan emphasizes balanced growth, environmental stewardship, and integration of different land uses to enhance the overall living experience in Lino Lakes. A goal defined in the Plan is to “Increase commercial/residential development in appropriate and designated areas in the City of Lino Lakes.” The City of Blaine’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the land west of the study area as low-density residential, and the City of Columbus identifies the land north of the study area as rural residential and as a wildlife management area. The Comprehensive Plan identified two new city parks and trails throughout the study area that are anticipated to be built as development occurs to serve future residential areas. The 2020 Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Watershed Management Plan outlines goals and strategies to address watershed challenges. Key focuses include water quality management, flood control, and natural resource preservation. RCWD aims to improve water quality and ensure sustainable water resource management through monitoring programs, watershed modeling, and best management practices. The plan highlights initiatives such as monitoring programs, best management practices, and stormwater management techniques tailored to the watershed’s unique challenges. The City of Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a long- term vision for the community’s future, guiding elected officials on land-use decisions and forming the legal basis for local rules and regulations, such as zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations. It fulfills the city’s requirements to the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act to ensure alignment with metropolitan system plans for transit, highways, airports, wastewater services, and parks and open spaces. The Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the intersection of Sunset and Main Street (the study area) as a key gateway into the community. It emphasizes the need to guide planning and development for this significant area and recommended completing a Master Plan for the corridor between Sunset and 4th Avenue. MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 6INTRODUCTION DRAFT ST U D Y AR E A GENERAL Located within the 7 county Metropolitan Council region, the City of Lino Lakes is a 33-square-mile northern suburb of the Twin Cities. At its heart is the pristine 5,300- acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Preserve, ensuring the preservation of natural settings and wildlife habitats. The community boasts 15 lakes and several wetlands and is conveniently positioned along interstates I-35E and I-35W, just a 20-minute drive from downtown Minneapolis or St. Paul. The city offers a unique blend of natural beauty, a rural atmosphere, urban REGIONAL CONTEXT 7 COUNTY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGION amenities, and convenient proximity to both St. Paul and Minneapolis, making it a desirable place to live and attractive for development opportunities. The approximate 962-acre study area forms the northwesternmost corner of Lino Lakes and is located along one of the “gateways” into the city via Main Street. The area is bounded by 4th Avenue to the east, Sunset Avenue to the west, Pine Street to the north, and Century Trail / Carl Street to the south. Blaine is adjacent to the west and Columbus to the north. MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 7INTRODUCTION DRAFT ST U D Y AR E A CARL ST CENTURY T R A I L 4T H A V E N U E EL M C R E S T A V E N U E LE X I N G T O N A V E N E MAIN STREET125TH AVE NE LA K E D R I V E 109TH AVE NE CITY HALL CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY OF HUGO CITY OF COLUMBUS CITY OF BLAINE CITY OF CIRCLE PINES CITY OF LINO LAKES CITY OF FOREST LAKE CITY OF HAM LAKE LA K E D R I V E MAIN S T R E E T GEORGE WATCH LAKE PELTIER LAKE CENTERVILLE LAKE RESHANAU LAKE RICE LAKE 1.7 MI L E 0 . 5 M I L E 1 . 0 M I L E CITY OF LINO LAKES CI T Y O F L I N O L A K E S CI T Y O F L I N O L A K E S SU N S E T A V E N U E PINE STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 8INTRODUCTION 0’ Scale: 1”= 1500’-0” 1500’ 3000’ DRAFT PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITY ROBINSON DRIVE 0’ Scale: 1”= 1000’-0” 500’ 1000’ Easement Priority Wetlands Easement ‘Sod Farm’ ‘Sod Farm’ Public Ditch Priority Wetlands GENERAL The study area is bisected by a major arterial, Main Street (CSAH 14), in an east-west direction and at the time of the study, is predominantly cropland (sod farming) alongside wooded areas and home sites. Land uses adjacent to the study area include residential land to the east and south, a small air park / airport to the south, agricultural land and open space to the north, and residential housing and open space to the west. There is one park within the study area and one nearby park south of the study area. Topography within the study area varies from 892 to 912 feet above mean sea level in elevation. The study area generally drains south via agricultural ditches located throughout the study area. OPPORTUNITIES As a gateway to the city, Main Street runs through the center of this area, connecting it to the rest of Lino Lakes. Future development should connect to existing trail networks and future trails, including a future regional trail proposed on Main Street. The study area is surrounded by a variety of homes, from farmstead to medium-density housing. Currently, the land within this study area is used for both low to medium density residential homes and sod farming and is expected to transition to a mix of low, medium, high density residential as well as small scale neighborhood commercial over the next 30+ years. SITE CONSTRAINTS The study area has physical constraints, including: • Underground pipeline that runs from the southeast corner near County Road 14 & 24th Avenue N to the northeast of the site and then crosses I-35E. • Wetlands within the study area boundary have been identified using the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). Additionally, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Comprehensive Wetland Protection Management Plan (CWPMP) identify “high priority wetlands” which were selected based upon a landscape-scale functional assessment. Additional protection measures could apply to high priority wetlands. It is anticipated that wetlands within the study area boundary will be subject to regulation under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). There are no mapped Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Watercourses or Waterbasins within the study area, therefore there are no wetlands that are anticipated to be regulated by the DNR. • FLOODPLAIN and DITCHES are located within the study area and the ditches are under the jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Floodplains within the study area have been identified using the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer. The majority of the study area is mapped as FEMA Flood Zone A. Additionally, FEMA Flood Zone AE is mapped offsite to the south and east. Ditches within the study area have been identified from RCWD data. Within the study area boundary, a majority of the mapped ditches are private agricultural ditches along sod fields roadways. Three (public) ditch segments, County Ditch 10, 22 and 32, are managed by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). All three ditches are mapped within NWI and Lino Lakes High Priority Wetlands in the study area. Refer to the AUAR documentation for more detailed description of the site and context. SITE OVERVIEW MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 9INTRODUCTION DRAFT ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW PROCESS The City of Lino Lakes was dedicated to engaging with residents about their goals concerning local development, particularly those living near the study area. To facilitate input, the city conducted community open houses, elected official and advisory group workshops, and stakeholder meetings to gather priorities and feedback from residents and agency staff. Residents were invited to learn about the planning process and provide feedback. These meetings provided key stakeholders with opportunities to provide early feedback and identify wants and concerns for development in the area. Groups included: • City Council and Advisory Boards • Residents that live within or adjacent to the study area • Leaders of Forest Lake and Centennial school districts • Anoka County • Rice Creek Watershed District Throughout the planning process, residents were encouraged to continually provide feedback, ensuring that development goals reflected diverse community priorities. Online feedback opportunities, including a survey, interactive comment map, and digital comment form, were also available on the project website. See Index for the full engagement summaries and feedback received. VISION The vision for the preferred development within the Main Street Master Plan is an outcome from the community engagement process that occurred in 2024-2025. The vision draws on the sites unique location as the entry into Lino Lakes by strategically arranging land uses to mark this as the gateway into the city and also maintains its rural qualities that define the area’s character. This effort also ensures that future development aligns with the goals and principles outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and complies with local, state, and federal regulations. Joint City Council/Advisory Board Work Session #1 11/21/2024 Community Open House #1 12/04/2024 Joint City Council/Advisory Board Work Session #2 01/15/2025 Community Open House #2 02/05/2025 Joint City Council/Advisory Board Work Session #3 03/05/2025 Community Open House #3 03/19/2025 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 10INTRODUCTION DRAFT BACKGROUND INFORMATION MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 11 DRAFT CURRENT ZONING The majority of the study area is zoned R, Rural, while a portion of the southwestern corner is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. Rural - preserve open land for agricultural purposes, maintain open space near urban areas, guide the development of urban and rural areas, and support the economic preservation of urban farms. Planned Unit Development - provides flexibility from typical zoning regulations to achieve public benefits that standard zoning might not allow. PUDs are characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, enhanced urban amenities, preservation of natural open spaces, and more economically efficient land use. Zoning changes would need to occur to accommodate future residential and commercial development. FUTURE LAND USE The 2040 Comprehensive Plan indicates land uses that include: Low Density Residential - Land guided for residential development with 1.6 to 3 dwelling units per acre. The city’s future residential land use will predominantly be low-density residential. Medium Density Residential - Land guided for residential development with 4 to 6 dwelling units per acre. High Density Residential - Land guided for residential development with 6 to 8 units per acre. Planned Residential Commercial - Land guided for a mix of residential, retail, and office uses to be incorporated within one building, structure, or development. Residential development in these areas may include higher-density housing options with densities ranging from 8 to 10 units per acre. This land use district provides opportunities for limited neighborhood-scale supportive commercial uses that are accessory to residential. Urban Reserve - Land guided for post-2040 development to promote orderly and efficient expansion of future urban services and to prevent premature expansion. LAND USE AND ZONING EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK The study area is bound by Pine Street NE to the north, Sunset Avenue (CSAH 53) to the west, Century Trail and Carl Street to the south, and 4th Avenue to the east. Main Street (CSAH 14) is an east-west road that bisects the study area. The area currently has limited road access in the area north of Main Street and several east-west streets on the south side including Lilac Street, Robinson Drive, Carl Street and Century Trail. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE Main Street is part of the Central Anoka County Regional Trail corridor with trails along both sides of the road to connect to the Rice Creek/Chain of Lakes Park Reserve trails. Additional trails are planned within the study area to connect the residential developments to the existing trail system. TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND ACCESS The city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Traffic Study as part of the AUAR identified the need for a new roadway network within the study area. As the study area develops, a proposed collector road would serve as a north-south connection from Robinson Drive to Main Street and continue north to Pine Street. Another collector road is anticipated to be built to provide an east-west connection from Robinson Drive to 4th Avenue. Local roads providing access to residential lots, generally low speed, and designed to discourage through traffic are expected to be built as development occurs. The planned roadway network will accommodate the orderly development of the existing and anticipated residential and commercial properties north and south of Main Street. New access points will also be needed along 4th Avenue and Pine Street. It is anticipated that coordination will be needed with Anoka County for any connections to county roads within the study area. See Appendix B for the AUAR Main Street Traffic Study for more details on expected traffic generation, future conditions, and mitigation.What does density look like in Lino Lakes? High Medium Low Rural Townhouses and other multi- family units Single-family homes Townhouses and single -family homes Lyngblomsten Density Type Housing types Units per acre Example in Lino Lakes Woods Edge Townhomes Nature’s Refuge Single-family homes and farms 4th Ave (Study Area) 8-10 units per acre Residential/ Commercial 6-8 units per acre 4-6 units per acre 1.6 -3 units per acre 1 unit per 10 acres Apartment complexes and commercial Century Farm North (Stud y Area) LAND USE, DENSITY AND HOUSING TYPES Planned Residential/Commercial 8-10 units per acre High Density 6-8 units per acre Medium Density 4-6 units per acre Low Density 1.6-3 units per acre LAND USE, DENSITY AND HOUSING TYPES Planned Residential/Commercial 8-10 units per acre High Density 6-8 units per acre Medium Density 4-6 units per acre Low Density 1.6-3 units per acre MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 12BACKGROUND INFORMATION DRAFT WETLANDS Wetlands within the study area have been identified using the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). There are approximately 156.4 acres of freshwater emergent, freshwater forested/ shrub, and freshwater pond wetlands within the study area, as well as 17.5 acres of riverine features. Additionally, high priority wetlands are noted on the figure and establish critical nodes and linkages for what will become the Wetland Management Corridors. High priority wetlands were identified based on the function of the wetland habitat, characteristic wetland hydrology and water quality, wetland role in downstream flooding, as well as plant species and community diversity. It is anticipated that wetlands within the study area boundary will be subject to regulation under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). DITCHES The ditches mapped throughout the study area are generally located between agricultural fields or adjacent to existing roadways and congregate in the southeastern portion of the study area before flowing offsite to the south. The public ditches located onsite are part of the Anoka County Ditch (ACD) system 10-22-32, denoted as the Public Drainage System maintained by Rice Creek Watershed District. All three ditches are mapped within NWI and Lino Lakes High Priority Wetlands in the study area. FLOODPLAIN Floodplains within the study area have been identified using the FEMA’s National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer. A significant portion of the site (~40-45% by area) is covered in FEMA Zone A. Additionally, FEMA Flood Zone AE is mapped offsite to the south and east. Rice Creek Watershed District has also delineated the area as localized 100-year floodplain. Permitting requirements from FEMA, city and Rice Creek Watershed District must be met for future development in the study area within floodplain areas. Refer to the Lino Lakes Main Street AUAR for more detail of the site and context. NATURAL RESOURCES AND DRAINAGE CONSERVATION DESIGN FRAMEWORK The city of Lino Lakes expects the current Anoka County Ditch system through the area to remain in place in terms of function but not in terms of location or overall quality. The ditch system can be relocated within a proposed development to facilitate drainage of stormwater runoff, aesthetics, passive recreational facilities, and habitat creation. The realigned ditch system should incorporate the following design guidelines: 1) Easements a. RCWD requires a 30-foot easement on either side of the county ditch system, measured from the top of bank, to provide access for maintenance. b. In addition to maintenance easements required by RCWD, the City proposes native buffers averaging 50’ in width with a minimum width of 25’, measured from the top of bank, to provide space for the greenway corridor creation. 2) Lake/Pond Construction in-line with Ditch a. Ditches can be routed through lakes/ponds subject to RCWD design requirements. The City supports this method of realignment. b. In the event that a proposed development will create an in-line lake or pond area in relation to the ditch system, the proposed development is required to provide: i. RCWD with a 30-foot easement from top of bank along the alignment of the ditch and extend into the pond based on the average width of easement at the entrance and exit location of the ditch into the lake/pond. ii. The RCWD easement shall be along a bank of the lake/pond, and not through the center of the pond to limit maintenance responsibility on the District. iii. Water Quality Basins shall be provided prior to discharge of stormwater runoff into the lake/pond. iv. City requires establishment of a buffer around a constructed lake/pond with minimum buffer based on function of the BMP. Buffers may vary around the perimeter of the constructed lake/pond but must meet the minimum and average distances along their edges. 3) Realignment a. The city of Lino Lakes is in support of realignment of the county ditch system when proposed to be consistent with the goals of the master plan. i. Realignment must be approved by RCWD through Rule I. ii. Additional buffer widths may be required through land use and zoning requirements. See FIGURE below for a cross section view of the easement and buffer requirements. Figure X: Cross Section View of Drainage and Conservation Framework MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 13BACKGROUND INFORMATION DRAFT UTILITIESINFORMATION FROM WSBMAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 14BACKGROUND INFORMATION DRAFT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 15 DRAFT Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update 10-1 Chapter 10: Parks, Greenways and Trails Introduction Lino Lakes has an impressive history of planning for parks and open space, including the 2004 Parks, Natural Open Space / Greenways and Trail System Plan� That plan was updated in 2011 as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update, and adopted by reference in Chapter 2, the Resource Management System Plan� This chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan brings together and replaces those separate studies with a cohesive plan that reflects the community’s long held belief that ongoing development must be in harmony with preserving the innate character of the city� The common vision and goal that has been carried throughout the various comprehensive plans and park plan updates is a continued focus on preserving the natural open space character of the city� This chapter of the Comprehensive Plan will describe the parks, greenways and trail systems, with open space and natural resource components as applicable� The chapter will be used for: • Strategic decision making, general policy setting, establishing priorities and budget allocations • Day-to-day use by staff and those charged with implementing the plan to ensure a high level of consistency in interpretation and action The following statements provide the key underpinnings of the progressive vision for parks, greenways and trails in Lino Lakes: • Foster a high quality of life within the context of ecological protection, responsible land stewardship, long-term sustainability, and economic viability� • Implement a balanced park, trail and greenway system offering multiple community values for a wide range of demographics and user groups� • Perpetuate an interconnected latticework of natural landscapes, greenways, parks and trails throughout the city� • Foster the “city as a park” concept, whereby preserved natural areas and parks serve as a primary factor in shaping the character of the community� • Maintain a high and consistent standard of quality throughout the system� • Adhere to a planning and design process to ensure consistency in public involvement and outcomes� •Allow for some flexibility in implementation of the plan to adjust to realistic financial limitations, unforeseen events, and shifts in priorities. Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 1: Introduction 1-3 Environment Lino Lakes’ residents place a high value on its lakes and open spaces� Lakes, wetlands and protected open space occupy approximately 45% of the city’s area and provide Lino Lakes with a character and ambiance unequaled within the region� The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes is the most significant and defining natural feature of the city’s landscape� This large natural amenity, much of which is protected in a regional park, attracts residents and sets the city apart from surrounding municipalities� It also shapes development by dividing the community and presenting challenges for providing infrastructure such as sewer and water and roadway connections� Lino Lakes’ city plans have long recognized the need to integrate the protection of the natural environment with all aspects of community development� The city has collaborated with the Rice Creek Watershed District to develop a unique and unprecedented city-wide, watershed-based Resource Management Plan (RMP)� While the RMP is primarily focused on wetlands and water resources, it also identifies important upland natural resource areas and provides the framework for a unified approach to natural resources management when combined with the city’s Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Land Use Plan, the Local Water Management Plan, and the Parks, Greenways and Trails� Circle Pines Columbus Centerville Arden Hills Blaine Ham Lake Hugo Dellwood Forest Lake Fridley GrantMounds View New Brighton North Oaks Lexington Lino Lakes Mahtomedi Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Twp. Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Circle Pines Columbus Centerville Arden Hills Blaine Ham Lake Hugo Dellwood ForestLake Fridley GrantMounds View New Brighton North Oaks Lexington Lino Lakes Mahtomedi Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Twp. Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Circle Pines Columbus Centerville Arden Hills Blaine Ham Lake Hugo Dellwood Forest Lake Fridley GrantMounds View New Brighton North Oaks Lexington Lino Lakes Mahtomedi Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Twp. Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Circle Pines Columbus Centerville Arden Hills Blaine Ham Lake Hugo Dellwood Forest Lake Fridley GrantMounds View New Brighton North Oaks Lexington Lino Lakes Mahtomedi Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Twp. Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Circle Pines Columbus Centerville Arden Hills Blaine Ham Lake Hugo Dellwood Forest Lake Fridley GrantMounds View New Brighton North Oaks Lexington Lino Lakes Mahtomedi Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Twp. Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Figure 1-2� Community DesignationRegional Planning Context In 1967 the Minnesota Legislature created the Metropolitan Council to plan and coordinate the orderly development of the seven-county metropolitan area. The 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires every municipality and county within the metropolitan area to prepare and submit a comprehensive plan for review by the Metropolitan Council� The Council reviews local plans for conformance to metropolitan systems plans (transit, highways and airport; wastewater services; and parks and open space), consistency with Council policies, and compatibility with adjacent and affected governmental units� Updates of local plans are triggered by updates to the systems plans and the issuance of “systems statements” to local governments by the Metropolitan Council� Systems Statements were issued in September of 2015� Updated local comprehensive plans are due to the Metropolitan Council for review by December 31, 2018. Community Designation In its Regional Development Guide, “Thrive MSP 2040”, the Metropolitan Council groups local jurisdictions with similar characteristics for the application of regional policies into “community designations�” The Council uses community designations to guide regional growth and development; establish land use expectations including overall development densities and patterns; and outline the respective roles of the Council and individual communities, along with strategies for planning for forecasted growth� Lino Lakes has been designated Emerging Suburban Edge (Figure 1-2)� Emerging Suburban Edge communities include cities, townships and portions of both that are in the early stages of transitioning from rural communities into urbanized levels of development� Emerging Suburban Edge communities offer both connections to urban amenities and the proximity to open spaces that characterizes a rural lifestyle� Emerging Suburban Edge communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth through 2040 and beyond at overall average net densities of at least three to five units per acre for new development and redevelopment� Higher density developments should be targeted to areas with better access to regional sewer and transportation infrastructure, connections to local commercial activity center, transit facilities and recreational amenities� P lanning Goals • Guide development of the area for the future • Define potential development scenarios • Outline development requirements Regional Framework • Lino Lakes is located withing the 7 county Metropolitan Council region Additional Factors • Consumer demand for housing choices based on lifestyle, age or income; variety in housing product • Balance of infrastructure, both natural and man-made • Public expectations; balancing development with vision to keep Lino Lakes’ reputation and identity as quiet and nature-friendly FACTORS INFLUENCING PLANNING Density Requirements • Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, overall City sewered residential must meet 3.0 - 5.0 units per acre • Provide enough land at 8.0 units per acre to accommodate future affordable housing need 2040 Comprehensive Plan • Alignment with metropolitan system plans for transit, highways, wastewater services, and parks and open spaces • Intersection of Sunset and Main Street (the study area) as a key gateway into the community • Lino Lakes is designated as an Emerging Suburban Edge city MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 16CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT PRELIMINARY PLANNING OPTIONS Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Permanent Rural Permanent Rural Permanent Rural PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET Low Density Resi Planned Resi / Com SCENARIO 1 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ‘FULL BUILD OUT’ SCENARIO 2 GATEWAY VILLAGE SCENARIO 3 ISLANDS OF DENSITY SCENARIO 4 PRESERVING OPEN SPACE BACKGROUND Scenario 1 was developed as the baseline to compare and illustrated the full build out from the current Comprehensive Plan. The other three concepts generally maintained the same land uses and overall density as the Comprehensive Plan but moved the land uses into different configurations. These four planning concepts were first presented for community and stakeholder feedback from November to December 2024. See Appendix B for the summary of the feedback received from this phase. Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density ResiLow Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium Density Resi Med Density Resi Med Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Permanent Rural Permanent RuralPermanent Rural Permanent Rural Permanent Rural PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET Low Density Resi Planned Resi / Com 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 2 0 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 2 0 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St M a i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St La k e Dr S u n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W C e n t e r v i l l e R d H o l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township C i t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus C i t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 2 0 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 2 0 t h A v e 2 0 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St M a i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St La k e Dr S u n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W C e n t e r v i l l e R d H o l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township C i t y o f B l a i n e C i t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 17CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT CONCEPT PLANNING - SCENARIO 1 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELABORATED Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density ResiMedium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density ResiPlanned Resi / Com Planned Resi / ComLow Density Resi *Preliminary concept planning scenarios are diagrammatic and were presented on January 15, 2025 at the Joint City Council / Advisory Board Work Session as well as on display February 5, 2025 at the 2nd community open house meeting. Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium Density Resi Med Density Resi Med Density Resi Medium Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / ComLow Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium Density Resi Med Density Resi Med Density Resi Medium Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / ComLow Density Resi A S 1 , S 1 B A S 1 , S 2 B A S 1 , S 3 B PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 18CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT CONCEPT PLANNING - SCENARIO 2 GATEWAY VILLAGE ELABORATED Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi A S 2 , S 1 B A S 2 , S 2 B A S 2 , S 3 B *Preliminary concept planning scenarios are diagrammatic and were presented on January 15, 2025 at the Joint City Council / Advisory Board Work Session as well as on display February 5, 2025 at the 2nd community open house meeting. PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREETPINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 19CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT CONCEPT PLANNING - SCENARIO 3 ISLANDS OF DENSITY ELABORATED Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Medium / High Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Low Density Resi Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi Medium Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi High Density Resi A S 3 , S 1 B A S 3 , S 2 B A S 3 , S 3 B *Preliminary concept planning scenarios are diagrammatic and were presented on January 15, 2025 at the Joint City Council / Advisory Board Work Session as well as on display February 5, 2025 at the 2nd community open house meeting. PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREET PINE STREETPINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREET CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 20CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT SCENARIOS FOR AUAR REVIEW Scenario 2.1 Gateway Village SCENARIO 3 Scenario 1: Comprehensive Plan ‘Full Build Out’ will also be evaluated in the AUAR. In order to meet the applicability requirements for completing an AUAR under Mn Rules 4410.3610, one or more development scenarios must be based on and consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. PREFERRED SCENARIO Scenario 1: ‘Full Build Out’ Feedback from community open houses, online comments, and stakeholder workshops revealed a preference for Scenario 2: Gateway Village, with some adjustments. This revised Scenario 2.1 will be studied in the AUAR. Scenario 3 Preserving Open Space Scenario 3: Preserving Open Space will not be reviewed in the AUAR. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELIMINATED Land Use NORTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High SF of Commercial Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 516 423 677 1269 464 367 587 1101 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 36 35 138 207 88 88 352 528 High Density Resi (R4) 63 62 370 494 64 64 384 512 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 11 90 112 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 30,492 3 3 30,492 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 630 533 630 533 SOUTH OF MAIN STREET Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Gross Acres Approx net acres w/o wetlands and open water Approx # of Units Low Approx # of Units High Low Density Resi (R1/R1-X/R2) 134 97 155 291 158 109 174 327 Medium Density Resi (R2/R3) 76 64 254 381 72 60 240 360 High Density Resi (R4) 64 53 317 423 44 44 264 352 Planned Resi / Com (R5) Planned Resi (80%) 11 10 83 104 11 11 90 112 Commerical (20%) 3 3 28,314 3 3 30,492 Park & Open Space 16 9 16 9 Sub-Total (approximate acres) 304 236 304 236 TOTAL 934 769 2,084 3,281 934 769 2,181 3,404 City Comprehensive Plan Full Build Out Scenario Gateway Village Scenario 2.1 SCENARIOS FOR AUAR REVIEW Scenario 2.1 Gateway Village SCENARIO 3 Scenario 1: Comprehensive Plan ‘Full Build Out’ will also be evaluated in the AUAR. In order to meet the applicability requirements for completing an AUAR under Mn Rules 4410.3610, one or more development scenarios must be based on and consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. PREFERRED SCENARIO Scenario 1: ‘Full Build Out’ Feedback from community open houses, online comments, and stakeholder workshops revealed a preference for Scenario 2: Gateway Village, with some adjustments. This revised Scenario 2.1 will be studied in the AUAR. Scenario 3 Preserving Open Space Scenario 3: Preserving Open Space will not be reviewed in the AUAR. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELIMINATED 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/202010-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 2 0 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 2 0 t h Av e 2 0 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St M a i n S t Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St La k e Dr S u n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W C e n t e r v i l l e R d H o l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township C i t y o f B l a i n e C i t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus C i t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 2 0 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 2 0 t h Av e 2 0 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St M a i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St La k e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W C e n t e r v i l l e R d H o l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township C i t y o f B l a i n e C i t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus C i t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 SCENARIOS FOR AUAR ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW BACKGROUND After receiving feedback from the community and stakeholders in December 2024, the Scenario 3 Islands of Density and Scenario 4 Preserving Open Space were combined into a revised Scenario 3 Preserving Open Space. During the second phase of engagement from January to March 2025, three scenarios (see previouis exhibits) were presented for community and stakeholder feedback. Scenario 1 Comprehensive Plan was required to be carried forward into the environmental review (AUAR document) per Mn Rules 4410.3610 and based on community and stakeholder feedback, a refined Scenario 2 (Scenario 2.1) became the preferred development scenario to advance. See Attachment B for the full engagement summaries from this phase. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT YIELD COMPARISON SCENARIO 1 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ‘FULL BUILD OUT’ SCENARIO 2.1 GATEWAY VILLAGE MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 21CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS DRAFT PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 22 DRAFT SCENARIO 2 THE PREFERRED SCENARIO - OVERVIEW Maximizing walk-ability with an interconnected approach, scenario 2 centralizes higher and medium density housing and commercial development near the Lino Lakes/Blaine border around Main Street and Sunset Avenue, with low-density prioritized on the eastern side of the study area, backing up to existing Lino Lakes housing. Outside of the Planned Residential / Commercial zone, additional consideration was given to keeping a rural feel along both sides of Main Street with an approximate 100’ natural landscape zone separating development. Roadway Network A proposed collector road would serve as a north-south connection from Robinson Drive to Main Street and continue north to Pine Street. Another collector road is anticipated to be built to provide an east-west connection from Robinson Drive to 4th Avenue. Additional neighborhood road connections are expected to be built to link future developments to these main roads. Parks and Trails A portion of the study area is anticipated to be used for city park use, as well as several greenway systems, which allow for a natural resource enhancement/conservation area. The area’s development will feature the construction of a segment of the Central Anoka County Regional Trail along Main Street. Upon completion, the trail will span three cities, extend 14.5 miles, and connect to a wider regional trail system. This scenario proposes a network of trails throughout the future development, totaling approximately 41,500 linear feet (LF) of asphalt trail and 5,200 LF of regional trail. PRIORITY WETLANDS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK NATURAL LANDSCAPE ALONG BOTH SIDES OF MAIN STREET NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING TREE CANOPY PRIORITY WETLANDS PRIORITY WETLANDS *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET ROBINSON DRIVE MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 23PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 0’ Scale: 1”= 1000’-0” 500’ 1000’ DRAFT SCENARIO 2 ‘NORTH OF MAIN’ GAS L I N E NATURAL LANDSCAPE TOWNHOME/MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD -SCALE COMMERCIAL GREENWAY SYSTEM & NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AREA STORMWATER DETENTION AREA MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK MAJOR DRAINAGE ROUTE MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE POCKET PARK STORMWATER DETENTION AREA POCKET PARK EXISTING TREE CANOPY PRIORITY WETLANDS POCKET PARK POCKET PARK MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 24PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 0’ Scale: 1”= 600’-0” 300’ 600’ DRAFT SCENARIO 2 ‘SOUTH OF MAIN’ GA S L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITY NATURAL LANDSCAPE STORMWATER DETENTION AREA GREENWAY SYSTEM & NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AREA MAJOR DRAINAGE ROUTE MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PRIORITY WETLANDS STORMWATER DETENTION AREA PRIORITY WETLANDS POCKET PARK POCKET PARK MINOR DRAINAGE ROUTE ALTERNATIVE *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E TOWNHOME/MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / LIMITED NEIGHBORHOOD -SCALE COMMERCIAL 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVE MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 25PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 0’ Scale: 1”= 600’-0” 300’ 600’ DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - LAND USE PLAN Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Resi / Com Planned Resi / Com Low Density Residential Low Density ResidentialHigh Density Residential High Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Resi Low Density Residential Housing densities at 1.6 – 3.0 units per acre. Generally located to avoid conflict with more intense land use, and high traffic volume roadways. Typically, Single Family and Two Family dwellings. Medium Density Residential Housing densities at 4.0- 6.0 units per acre. Serves as transition between lower and higher intensity uses. Smaller lot SF, Two Family and attached/ detached townhome dwellings. High Density Residential Housing densities at 6.0 to 8.0 units per acre. Transition between lower and higher intensity uses such as commercial of high volume roads. Townhomes, multi-family dwellings. Planned Residential/ Commercial Housing densities at 8.0 to 10.0 units per acre. Provides for affordable and life cycle housing choices with opportunities for neighborhood scale retail, service, and office uses. LAND USE ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LAND USE PLAN LAND USE The City of Lino Lake’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in November 2020, identifies the study area as low-density residential, medium- density residential, high-density residential, planned residential/ commercial, and urban reserve. The plan emphasizes balanced growth, environmental stewardship, and integration of different land uses to enhance the overall living experience in Lino Lakes. A goal defined in the Plan is to “Increase commercial/residential development in appropriate and designated areas.” The City of Blaine’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the land west of the study area as low-density residential, and the City of Columbus identifies the land north of the study area as rural residential and as a wildlife management area. *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only DQGGRQRWUHSUHVHQWÀQDOGHVLJQ For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITYOVERHEAD UTILITY 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET ROBINSON DRIVEROBINSON DRIVE PINE STREETPINE STREET MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 26PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - LAND USE HEIGHTS * HIGH DENSITY AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL / COMMERCIAL *All of the planned land uses within the Main Street Master Plan are limited to residential building heights of three stories or 40 feet. For comparison, most single family homes are under 30 feet in building height. For additional information/ detail regarding land use designations, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3. MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 27PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - MOBILITY ROADWAY SYSTEM TRAIL SYSTEM ROADWAYS A proposed collector road would serve as a north-south connection from Robinson Drive to Main Street and continue north to Pine Street. Another collector road is anticipated to be built to provide an east- west connection from Robinson Drive to 4th Avenue. Principal Arterial Roadways that provide the greatest level of mobility and access control. Major Collector Minor Collector Roadways that provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. *Dashed equals proposed Local Roads providing access to residential lots, generally low speed, and designed to discourage through traffic. *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITY OVERHEAD UTILITY For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 6. For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 10. TRAILS As part of the study area, the master plan promotes alternative transportation such as bicycling and walking. In addition to roads, mobility also includes the system of trails and sidewalks. Regional Concrete Asphalt *Dashed equals proposed 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVEROBINSON DRIVE PINE STREETPINE STREET MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 28PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - WATER MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANDRAINAGE ROUTES SCENARIO 2DRAINAGE ROUTES DRAINAGE The site generally drains through the existing ditch systems which bisect the study area from the northwest to the south, with discharges to the onsite wetlands before flowing offsite to the southeast. Major Route Minor Route PUBLIC DITCHES The existing public ditches located onsite are part of the Anoka County Ditch (ACD) system 10-22-32. The master plan proposed the current Anoka County Ditch system through the area to remain in place in terms of function but not in terms of location or overall quality. The ditch system would be relocated within the proposed plan to facilitate drainage of stormwater runoff, while enhancing aesthetics as well as creating passive recreational facilities and habitat. *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITYOVERHEAD UTILITY For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 7. For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 7. 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVEROBINSON DRIVE PINE STREETPINE STREET MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 29PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - NATURAL SYSTEMS GREENWAY SYSTEM Greenways and trails in the master plan are meant to connect residents to each other and to various amenities throughout the study area crossing as few roads as possible. NATURAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AREAS These generally consist of areas that fill gaps in the greenway system and/or provide a corridor for the greenway-based trail system, providing linkages between recreation areas (i.e., parks and trails). *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITYOVERHEAD UTILITY For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 10. For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 10. NEIGHBORHOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COMPREHENSIVE PLANGREENWAY SYSTEM SCENARIO 2GREENWAY SYSTEM 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVEROBINSON DRIVE PINE STREETPINE STREET MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 30PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - PARK AND OPEN SPACE PARK COVERAGE AREAS OPENS SPACES OPEN SPACE TYPES High Priority Wetlands Wetlands Stormwater Open Space PARK TYPES Neighborhood Park (NP) These parks bring people together to recreate and socialize close to home. Providing a balanced set of amenities that appeal to a range of individuals is important to meeting park needs and new recreational trends. Active, non- programmed recreation remains the mainstay of neighborhood parks. General coverage area of residents served is 1/2 mile radius, or between a 10 and 15 minute walk. Pocket Park (PP) These parks tend to develop on small, solitary, irregularly shaped lots and serve hyper- local residents and are typically maintained by an HOA. Elements could include benches, tables, fountains, simple playgrounds, monuments, historic markers, art installations, flower beds, and community gardens. General coverage area of residents served is 1/4 mile radius, or between a 5 and 10 minute walk. PP PP PP NP NP PPPP *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITY OVERHEAD UTILITY For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 10. For additional information/ detail, refer to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapters 7 and 10. PINE STREETPINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREETCARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVEROBINSON DRIVE MAIN STREETMAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 31PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAY SYSTEM EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. GAS L I N E GAS L I N E OVERHEAD UTILITY OVERHEAD UTILITY EXISTING TREES (TYP) GREENWAY SYSTEM PROPOSED TREES (TYP) SCENARIO 2 - PARK AND OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TYPES High Priority Wetlands Wetlands Stormwater Open Space NEIGHBORHOOD PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PINE STREET PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L CENTURY T R A I L ROBINSON DRIVE ROBINSON DRIVE MAIN STREET MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 32PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - MAJOR ROAD SECTIONS A S 2 , S 1 B A S 2 , S 2 B A S 2 , S 3 B *Master plan exhibits are diagrammatic in nature, for AUAR study purposes only and do not represent final design. A S2, S3 B PINE STREET 4T H A V E N U E SU N S E T A V E N U E CARL STREET CENTURY T R A I L MAIN STREET MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 33PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT SCENARIO 2 - UTILITIES AND UTILITY STAGINGINFORMATION FROM WSBMAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 34PREFERRED DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION & NEXT STEPS MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 35 DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION The Main Street Master Plan is the guiding plan for future development in the study area. The Master Plan is intended to show a general land use arrangement with some specific design elements. The individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as part of the development review process, but should be based on the Master Plan, including specific elements noted below. • AUAR 1. Development proposals must be within the scenarios studied in the AUAR and follow the mitigation plan (see Index to this document for the mitigation plan). • Land Use and Zoning 1. The specific residential and commercial land use boundaries on Master Plan should be generally followed and considered somewhat flexible in order to accommodate natural features, land assembly and other physical issues. 2. Require that tools such as clustering, buffering, and/or screening be incorporated into future development plans to mitigate potential land use conflicts. • Natural Resources/Water 1. Construct the water and sewer infrastructure per the AUAR and 2040 Comprehensive Plan requirements. 2. Implement the Conservation Design Framework, which includes establishing greenway corridors throughout the study area to provide connectivity for ecological and wildlife corridors, regional stormwater collection and conveyance, and passive recreational opportunities. 3. Direct stormwater collection, trees, and open space to be a natural buffer along Main Street. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN & NEXT STEPS IMPLEMENTATION (CONT.) • Parks and Open Space 1. Create parks, natural open space and greenways that connect to a larger trail system that will be established across the study area. This will link to the existing trail connection to the south of the study area, and link to a future regional trail along Main Street. The specific alignment of the trail corridor and pocket parks across the Master Plan area will be determined as development occurs. • Transportation 1. Create access points and a road network to support future development per the Master Plan and AUAR documentation. NEXT STEPS This Master Plan is to be incorporated into the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan with an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. This includes amendments to the Proposed Land Use Map and zoning amendments should follow if and when appropriate. As a next step, the City will consider amending the 2024 Lino Lakes Gateway Planning manual to change the Main Street and Sunset Avenue intersection to be designated as a “primary gateway”. Future development would need to comply with the primary gateway design elements as it relates to monument signs, landscaping, roundabout design, etc. Future developers will need to work with the City and other agencies to construct and phase appropriately the major infrastructure improvements needed to expand the capacity of the water and wastewater system is this area. The Master Plan illustrates the desired location of future land uses within a concept design to provide a framework for future development in this area but the Plan remains flexible with land use boundaries to accommodate natural features, land assembly and other physical boundaries, if needed. MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 36IMPLEMENTATION & NEXT STEPS DRAFT INDEX Attachment A - AUAR Mitigation Plan Attachment B - Engagement Summaries Attachment C - 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Select Exhibits) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 37 DRAFT ATTACHMENT A - AUAR MITIGATION PLAN The following Mitigation Plan report pages are part of a larger AUAR report. For the full AUAR and references with the Mitigation Plan, refer to Lino Lakes Main Street Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) dated [Month] 2025. The Mitigation Plan references both the Comprehensive Plan (Scenario 1) and the preferred land use plan Scenario 2. Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 77 May 2025 Draft Mitigation Plan This Draft Mitigation Plan is submitted as part of the AUAR to provide reviewers and regulators with an understanding of the actions that are advisable, recommended, or necessary to protect the environment and minimize potential impacts by the proposed development scenarios. This Mitigation Plan has been revised and updated based on comments received during the Draft AUAR comment period. This Draft Mitigation Plan is intended to satisfy the AUAR rules that require the preparation of a mitigation plan that specifies measures or procedures that will be used to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the potential impacts of development within the AUAR study area. Although mitigation strategies are discussed throughout the AUAR document, this plan will be formally adopted by the RGU as their action plan to prevent potentially significant environmental impacts. The primary mechanism for mitigation of environmental impacts is the effective use of ordinances, rules, and regulations. The plan does not modify the regulatory agencies’ responsibilities for implementing their respective regulatory programs nor create additional regulatory requirements. The plan specifies the legal and institutional arrangements that will assure that the adopted mitigation measures are implemented. In addition to the anticipated permits and approvals listed in Table 5, the mitigation measures developed in the AUAR process are outlined in Table 15. The plan is formatted consistent with the sections of the AUAR for ease of reference. Table 15: Draft Mitigation Plan Resource Area Mitigation Land Use Scenario 1 and 2: Majority of the existing zoning is rural, which serves as a holding district until municipal services are available. Property will be considered for rezoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, at the time of a development proposal. Scenario 2: Would require a comprehensive plan amendment. Scenario 1 and 2: The City will coordinate with the Metropolitan Council regarding any modifications needed to the TAZ forecasts for the AUAR study area, if needed. Scenario 1 and 2: Use the information contained in the AUAR during future considerations of updates or amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Any future consideration of amendments or updates to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances would follow the city’s set procedures and guidelines for such amendments. Scenario 1 and 2: Require that tools such as clustering, buffering, and/or screening be incorporated into future development plans to mitigate potential land use conflicts. Geology, Soils, and Topography Scenario 1 and 2: Where required, slope stabilization will be provided by means of vegetation establishment, erosion control blankets, or other standard methods of erosion and sediment control. An erosion control plan will be submitted to the City of Lino Lakes and future proposed development within the AUAR study area will require compliance with the City’s erosion and sediment control standards. Scenario 1 and 2: A NPDES and SWPPP will be obtained prior to any earthwork or grading activities within the AUAR study area. Require project proposers to meet the erosion and sediment control regulations in all applicable regulations, ordinances and rules of the city and MPCA, and Rice Creek Watershed District. Lino Lakes Main Street Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) May 2025 Prepared for: Prepared by: Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR i May 2025 Table of Contents 1. Project Title ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Proposer ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3. RGU .............................................................................................................................................. 3 4. Reason for EAW Preparation ........................................................................................................ 3 5. Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 4 6. Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 8 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience ............................................................................................. 12 8. Cover Types ................................................................................................................................ 18 9. Permits and Approvals Required ................................................................................................ 21 10. Land Use ..................................................................................................................................... 23 11. Geology, Soils, and Topography/Landforms ............................................................................... 33 12. Water Resources ........................................................................................................................ 37 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes .............................................................................. 52 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ........... 56 15. Historic Properties ....................................................................................................................... 65 16. Visual .......................................................................................................................................... 65 17. Air ................................................................................................................................................ 65 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ................................................................ 67 19. Noise ........................................................................................................................................... 69 20. Transportation ............................................................................................................................. 70 21. Cumulative Potential Effects ....................................................................................................... 76 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................ 76 Draft Mitigation Plan .......................................................................................................................... 77 List of Tables Table 1: Development Scenarios ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 2: Climate Considerations and Adaptations ............................................................................ 15 Table 3: Cover Types ........................................................................................................................ 19 Table 4: Trees ................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Permits and Approvals Required ......................................................................................... 21 Table 6: Lino Lakes 2040 Comprehensive Plan Designations within the AUAR Study Area ............ 25 Table 7: Soil Types ........................................................................................................................... 35 Table 8: Projected Wastewater Demands ......................................................................................... 44 Table 9: Project Water Demands ...................................................................................................... 50 Table 10: MPCA “What’s in My Neighborhood?” Sites ...................................................................... 52 Table 11: Construction Emissions ..................................................................................................... 68 Table 12: Operational Emissions ...................................................................................................... 68 Table 13: Trip Generation Forecasts ................................................................................................. 71 Table 14: Intersection LOS ................................................................................................................ 72 Table 15: Draft Mitigation Plan .......................................................................................................... 77 List of Figures Figure 1: USGS Map ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2: AUAR Study Area ................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3: Scenario 1 .......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4: Scenario 2 .......................................................................................................................... 11 Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR ii May 2025 Figure 5: NCEI County Time Series - Average Temperature Trends for Anoka County ................... 12 Figure 6: NCEI County Time Series - Average Precipitation Trends for Anoka County .................... 13 Figure 7: Existing Cover Types ......................................................................................................... 20 Figure 8: Existing Land Use .............................................................................................................. 24 Figure 10: 2040 Land Use ................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 9: Existing Zoning ................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 11: FEMA 100-year Floodplain .............................................................................................. 31 Figure 12: Soil Types ........................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 13: Surface Water Resources Within the Study Area ............................................................. 39 Figure 14: Surface Water Resources Within 1 Mile of AUAR Study Area ......................................... 40 Figure 15: Minnesota Well Index ....................................................................................................... 42 Figure 16: Cross Section View of Drainage and Conservation Framework ....................................... 49 Figure 18: MPCA Sites ...................................................................................................................... 54 Figure 19: Native Plant Communities, Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and Regionally Significant Ecological Areas ............................................................................................................................... 64 Figure 20: Traffic Study Intersections ................................................................................................ 75 List of Appendices Appendix A: List of Tax Parcels within Study Area Appendix B: Agency Correspondence Appendix C: Greenhouse Gas Analysis Appendix D: Traffic Study MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 38INDEX DRAFT Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 78 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Scenario 1 and 2: Provide construction oversight to ensure designed sediment and erosion control measures are being implemented. Scenario 1 and 2: Future developers would complete a geotechnical report that would provide recommendations for structural and foundation design based on the soil types in the study area. Floodplains Scenario 1 and 2: If any potential impacts are proposed to FEMA 100-Year Floodplains as part of development within the AUAR study area, the applicable City of Lino Lakes and RCWD approvals will be obtained. Scenario 1 and 2: Floodplain alterations will require submittal of appropriate Letter of Map Change to FEMA to document changes to floodplain boundaries. Water Resources Wetlands Scenario 1 and 2: Delineate wetlands in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and classify wetlands according to Wetlands of the United States (Circular 39) and Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Scenario 1 and 2: Follow sequencing process of wetland avoidance, minimization, rectification, and mitigation as outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) if wetlands area altered. If any potential impacts are proposed to regulated wetlands as part of development within the AUAR study area, the applicable City of Lino Lakes, WCA, RCWD, and USACE permits will be obtained. Scenario 1 and 2: Required wetland buffers will be incorporated into site design. Stormwater Scenario 1 and 2: Stormwater BMPs will be constructed in accordance with City, RCWD, and MIDS requirements as the property is developed. Scenario 1 and 2: During construction, erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented and maintained to prevent impacts to aquatic ecosystems. Scenario 1 and 2: Require stormwater management systems to be developed in accordance with the current version of the Rice Creek Watershed District Rules and Chapter 1011 of City Code, as amended. Scenario 1 and 2: Stormwater BMPs shall follow the order of implementation of infiltration practices, water reuse, biofiltration, wet sedimentation unless site restrictions can be documented to demonstrate that alternate practices can meet City and RCWD stormwater requirements and approval by City and RCWD. Scenario 1 and 2: Any supplementary volume, sediment, and other pollutants associated with stormwater originating offsite that travels through the study area will be accounted for in the final design of stormwater BMPs. Water Appropriation Scenario 1 and 2: A DNR temporary water appropriation permit will be obtained for any dewatering that will be needed for construction. Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 79 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Scenario 1 and 2: If any unknown wells are found within the AUAR study area, the wells will be sealed and the sealings sent to the Department of Health if the termination of the permit is requested. Scenario 1 and 2: The City will need to install new wells, Wells No. 8 and 9, to serve the entirety of the study area and satisfy City-wide water demands. Scenario 1 and 2: Monitor water usage and do not permit new development to proceed if it exceeds the capacity of the water supply and distribution system. Scenario 1 and 2: Construct the water supply and distribution system in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health standards and with the goals, policies, and recommendations set forth in the city’s Comprehensive Water System Plan. Water Resources Scenario 1 and 2: As necessary, amend the city’s Comprehensive Water System Plan and Capital Improvement Plan to be consistent with any future amendments or updates to the Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or alterations to the water system. Scenario 1 and 2: Prepare a Wellhead Protection Plan amendment for new wells and follow the adopted wellhead protection plans for Lino Lakes Scenario 1 and 2: Continue to implement the City’s adopted water conservation policies which are intended to attenuate peak water demands throughout the City. Scenario 1 and 2: Mitigation will be regulated through the city’s development approval and permitting process. Proposed master development plans, planned unit development and subdivision applications, plats, and/or site plans must address relevant water conservation mitigation measures prior to final approval by the city. Implementation of mitigation measures will be assured through developer agreements with the city, which will require a financial security for land and infrastructure improvements and/or revoke the right to acquire building permits and/or certificates of occupancy until all relevant mitigation measures have been addressed. Wastewater Scenario 1 and 2: Construct and phase appropriately the major infrastructure improvements needed to expand the capacity of the wastewater system (i.e. lift stations, forcemains, and upgrades to the existing systems) in accordance with the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. Scenario 1 and 2: Amend the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan to be consistent with any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or alterations to the sanitary sewer system and regional capacity needs. Scenario 1 and 2: Each proposed development will be required to provide a detailed projection of wastewater generation and flows. These calculations will be checked by the City’s Engineering Consultant. ATTACHMENT A - AUAR MITIGATION PLAN (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 39INDEX DRAFT Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 80 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Water Resources Scenario 1 and 2: The City will create a year-end report to evaluate wastewater increases by major sewer lines and overall system usage in relation to capacity. Results of this assessment will become the targets for growth for the following year. Contamination / Hazardous Waste Scenario 1 and 2: Demolition-related waste material, such as wood, concrete, and glass, will be either recycled or disposed in the proper facilities in accordance with state regulations and guidelines. Scenario 1 and 2: Development will generate construction-related waste materials such as wood, packaging, excess materials, and other wastes, which would be either recycled or disposed in the proper facilities in accordance with state regulations and guidelines. Scenario 1 and 2: For solid waste generated from the completed project, a source recycling/separation plan would be implemented, and wastes that cannot be recycled would be managed in accordance with state regulations and guidelines. Scenario 1 and 2: Future developers will need to complete a Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment prior to construction and coordinate with the MPCA on safe handling and disposal of any contamination and hazardous materials found on the site prior and during construction. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources Scenario 1 and 2: State requirements necessitate the control and spread of state listed noxious weeds and/or invasive weeds if encountered prior to construction. Methods to avoid spreading noxious weeds and/or invasive species will be incorporated into project specifications and/or SWPPP when developed. Scenario 1 and 2: Disturbed areas would be reestablished using appropriate native pollinator-friendly and stabilization seed mixes. Scenario 1 and 2: Invasive species will be controlled during site construction. Additionally, appropriate measures will be taken to control the spread of invasive species will be controlled during construction and landscaping:  Inspecting construction equipment and removing any visible plant, seeds, mud, dirt clods, and animals when arriving and leaving a site.  Using native seed mixes for revegetation whenever possible to encourage non-invasive plant communities in areas of bare soil post-construction.  Using mulch, soil, gravel, etc., that is free of invasive species whenever possible.  Inspecting soil and plant material during planting for signs of invasive species and removing or destroying the invasive species or the plant and associated soil if the invasive species cannot be separated out. Scenario 1 and 2: Tree clearing activities will be restricted to winter months (November 1 - March 31). If winter tree clearing is not feasible, technical assistance from the USFWS may be required. Tree removal will also adhere to the City's tree preservation requirements. Any tree removal will have to follow tree preservation requirements, as outlined in City Code 1007.049, as amended. 32 Scenario 1 and 2: Reseeding herbaceous areas with native seed mixes will be utilized when possible to avoid impacts to the monarch butterfly and rusty patch bumble bee. Pending DNR’s review, additional mitigation measures may be added to avoid and minimize impacts to state listed threatened and endangered species. 32 Source: City Code 1007.049 Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 81 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources Scenario 1 and 2: Implement the Conservation Design Framework, which includes conservation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA’s), buffering these natural resources, and establishing greenway corridors throughout the AUAR area to provide connectivity for ecological and wildlife corridors, regional stormwater collection and conveyance, and passive recreational opportunities. Scenario 1 and 2: Require public land dedication of priority natural open space areas through the subdivision process. Scenario 1 and 2: Require that cash in lieu of public land dedication for subdivisions within the AUAR area be spent within the AUAR area to purchase, restore, and/or maintain priority natural open space areas. Scenario 1 and 2: Establish mechanisms for ecological restoration, management, stewardship, and education. Scenario 1 and 2: Consult with the DNR and/or US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine appropriate mitigation strategies for activities near the Bald Eagle’s nests within the AUAR area before development occurs within the vicinity of the nests, including reviewing recommended disturbance limit guidelines developed by the DNR. Historic Resources Scenario 1 and 2: If a federal nexus is identified during preparation of project permits (if a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer permit is required due to impacts to regulated wetlands), a Phase I Archaeological Assessment may be necessary. Scenario 1 and 2: If human remains are recovered at any time during archaeological investigation or development, all activities must stop and consultation initiated with the Office of the State Archaeologist and Minnesota Indian Affairs Council. Visual Scenario 1 and 2: Guidance from the USFWS to minimize blue light, uplight, and backlight will be adhered to the extent practicable. Air Scenario 1 and 2: Construction will generate temporary fugitive dust emissions. These emissions will be controlled by sweeping or watering as appropriate or as prevailing weather and soil conditions dictate. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Car bon Footprint Scenario 1 and 2: To limit GHG emissions/carbon footprint, developers should consider the following measures:  Use energy efficient appliances, equipment, and lighting  Use energy efficient building shells  Encourage the use of the use of alternative modes of transportation to and from the project through site design  Implement waste best management practices and to recycle and compost appropriate material when applicable  Utilize on-site landscaping will absorb water  Consider trees and tree trenches, and additional landscaping will be planted to improve local air quality, absorb greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce local urban heat island effect  Construct buildings with rooftop-ready infrastructure for solar power generation  Provide electric vehicle ready charging infrastructure Noise Scenario 1 and 2: Construction activities may result in temporarily elevated noise levels. The City of Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances regulates both the hours of operation for construction equipment and allowable noise levels. Construction of the proposed project would comply with these requirements. ATTACHMENT A - AUAR MITIGATION PLAN (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 40INDEX DRAFT Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 82 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Transportation Scenario 1 and 2: Create a monitoring program that closely evaluates traffic impacts from proposed developments within the AUAR area and implement traffic mitigation measures as development occurs within the AUAR area. Scenario 1 and 2: Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses, bicyclists, and pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations. Scenario 1 and 2: Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures such as appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential areas. Scenario 1 and 2: Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site plans make use of access management practices to promote safe, effective traffic flow. Scenario 1 and 2: Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway Department Development Review Process Manual Scenario 1 and 2: Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable transportation authorities. Scenario 1 and 2: The improvements are intended to represent the minimum level of infrastructure investment that would be needed to meet acceptable level of service standards. Additional roadway and non-motorized improvements, beyond the minimum level, may be identified to accommodate specific development needs that are identified within the AUAR area. Primary improvements, regardless of land use scenario, include: Opening Year (2030) No-Build Conditions  No recommended mitigation (beyond planned improvements) Opening Year (2030) Scenario 1 Conditions  Install side street stop control at the site access points.  Install right turn lanes at all access points along Sunset Avenue & Main Street  Install a roundabout at any full-access point along Main Street (Access C)  While not required based on the traffic operations results, it is recommended to connect Robinson Drive to 4th Avenue (Access E) to improve connectivity. Lino Lakes Main Street - AUAR 83 May 2025 Resource Area Mitigation Transportation Opening Year (2030) Scenario 2 Conditions  Install side street stop control at all RIRO site access points.  Install right turn lanes at all access points along Sunset Avenue & Main Street  Install a roundabout at any full-access point along Main Street (Access C)  While not required based on the traffic operations results, it is recommended to connect Robinson Drive to 4th Avenue (Access E) to improve connectivity. Design Year (2045) No-Build Conditions  No recommended mitigation (beyond planned improvements) Design Year (2045) Scenario 1 Conditions  All Opening Year (2030) Scenario 1 Conditions  Install side street stop control at all access points along 4th Avenue and Pine Street.  Install southbound right turn lanes at 4th Avenue & Access E (south of Main Street)  Install northbound left turn lanes at access points on 4th Avenue north of Main Street (Access F and Access G).  Expand Main Street to a four-lane road west of Lake Drive o Includes expanding roundabouts at Sunset Avenue and Access C to 2x1 roundabouts.  Install a 2x1 roundabout at Main Street & 4th Avenue  Expand Main Street & Lake Drive roundabout to accommodate northbound left-turn traffic. o The roundabout is anticipated to require two northbound entry lanes, two exit lanes on the west leg, and a bypass lane for the eastbound approach Design Year (2045) Scenario 2 Conditions  All Opening Year (2030) Scenario 1 Conditions  Install side street stop control at all access points along 4th Avenue and Pine Street.  Install southbound right turn lanes at access points along 4th Avenue south of Main Street (i.e., Access E).  Install northbound left turn lanes at access points on 4th Avenue north of Main Street (Access F and Access G).  Expand Main Street to a four-lane road west of Lake Drive o Includes expanding roundabouts at Sunset Avenue and Access C to 2x1 roundabouts.  Install a 2x1 roundabout at Main Street & 4th Avenue  Expand Main Street & Lake Drive roundabout to accommodate northbound left-turn traffic. o The roundabout is anticipated to require two northbound entry lanes, two exit lanes on the west leg, and a bypass lane for the eastbound approach Additionally, the Sunset Avenue & Lilac Street roundabout should be monitored for potential future improvements, particularly under Scenario 2 conditions. Scenario 1 and 2: Require a traffic impact analysis for all development projects within the AUAR area. The traffic impact analysis will assist the City and other road authorities in determining the appropriate mitigation measures that are required to mitigate impacts of a specific development proposal. ATTACHMENT A - AUAR MITIGATION PLAN (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 41INDEX DRAFT ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES OPEN HOUSE 1 Mapping Northwest Main – Open House 1 Summary Date/Location: December 4, 2024, 6-8 p.m. at t he Rookery Activity Center Format: Open House Attendees: 70-90 Purpose: The goal of the open house was to introduce the project and the planning process, educate residents on land use and density requirements, and gather feedback on the community’s vision for the project area. Meeting Format : The open house was a come-and-go station concept with display boards, a density activity, and a feedback map. Attendees were invited to manipulate density in the planning area, provide comments on the project map, vision board, comment forms, and brainstorm their vision for the area. ______________________________________________________________ Summary of Feedback and Comments Comment Themes: A total of 72 written comments were received during the open house. The comments are summarized by theme below: Density or Design Preference – comments on the distribution of various density levels within the study area and their design preferences for future structures. • Preference for low-density and large lot sizes • Preference for more open space south of Main Street • Preference for different builders to develop the area, not just one or two • Dislike for “cookie -cutter” developments where homes are built on small lots using bulk and uniform materials • Desire for housing structures to be three stories or less • Preference for single-family homes over townhomes, apartments, or other multi - family housing styles Community Impacts – comments on potential ways new development may impact current residents or the existing character of Lino Lakes. • Concern that new development will negatively impact existing residents by increasing property taxes, contributing to existing traffic issues, and over-populating local schools • Concern that new developments will segregate the community • Desire to minimize impacts and preserve Carl Street • Desire to maintain Lino Lakes’ reputation and identity as quiet and nature -friendly Development Idea – comments on visions and ideas for the study area that would benefit the whole community. • Desire for gathering spaces such as playgrounds, parks, sports facilities, and a town center • Desire for parks, trails, and a pedestrian bridge over Main Street to connect area with the rest of Lino Lakes • Desire for commercial spaces that accommodate retail and restaurants Environmental Impacts – comments on potential impacts new development may have on existing natural resources. • Concern regarding development impacts on wetlands and water quality • Concern that construction will impact bird migration patterns and eagle nests • Concern that lighting from the new development will reduce night sky visibility and cause light pollution MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 42INDEX DRAFT ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 1 Figure 1 Pie chart showing that most comments were design or density preferences followed by comments regarding community impacts Comments Received: All comments received at the Open House are listed below by activity. Comments Received at the Density Activity N of Main Street • Residential/commercial and high density placed on the farthest Northwest corner of the study area S of Main Street • Rural/farmland and low density housing placed between existing medium density housing and wetlands Entire study area • Mixed preference for high density to be located away or near Main Street • Commercial district off Main Street as you enter the study area from Blaine • Value for open space and farmland • Dislike for residential buildings above three stories • Doesn’t matter what the density is as long as developers pay taxes 29% 22% 31% 18% Comment Themes Community Impacts Development Idea Density/Design Preference Environmental Impacts Figure 2 Photo of attendees participating in the density activity at the open house Comments Received on the Vision Board Concerns Only tax impacts on residents, not developers Concerns that residents are not always considered by the city; residents want larger lots and low density Cookie-cutter developments hurting community character Impacts to water quality Negative impacts to local developments Negative impact to the visibility of the night sky Preferences/ Vision/Ideas Create a “third space”: 1. Home 2. Work 3. Gather: a true town center with retail, parks, restaurants, etc. Access to greenway – easily connected for bikes/people Create community area with ice skating rink like Maple Grove More community spaces – playgrounds, activities, parks More detailed guidelines to manage future development to make a community – not a subdivision Pedestrian bridge over Main Street No change, keep it as is Homes with parks and trails Leave wetlands as is, low density housing with parks and open areas Smaller scale MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 43INDEX DRAFT Show case the “Gateway to Lino Lakes’ as low density, environmental, peaceful, nature-friendly, and quiet in the NW quadrant (no retail or commercial here, put retail and commercial by 35W + 35E only) Figure 3 Photo of vision board with comments at the open house Comments Received on the Project Map Concerns Where is all the purged groundwater going? Potential hazards from building farmland, thinking about toxins and water quality How will our schools absorb the increase in population? Traffic impacts due to new developments (Sunset/Main) If Century Trail is opened to the area south of Main, then all traffic wishing to avoid the traffic circle will just cut through this once quiet neighborhood! Keep the areas separate! Who is going to pay for the property taxes if it is all parks? Impacts to wetlands Migration patterns through the area Impacts to acting eagles’ nest Airport traffic patterns over the area south of Main Street Flooding in area – impact on surrounding area No lighting on Main Street through Lino Lakes Airport noise All these roads will probably need to be rebuilt because of construction. Can they take the amount of new traffic? Are escrow accounts created to make sure infrastructure is paid for? Power lines are not safe to live under, low density or no density Preference/ Vision/ Ideas Create a park area here, preserve “open area” No segregated housing…promote integration Low density is a must. Protect Carl Streat areas for wildlife Max building height of 3 stories Work with snowmobile clubs to bring winter traffic, bike trail for summer access Cap 8 unites per structure, cap 3 story buildings, and do not allow the same builder to develop the entire area Nature play area like Tamarack Nature Center Do not want single family homes in medium density. Do not want to look like Blaine with houses on top of each other. *Min 1/3 acre per SFH Re-zone for low density, residential only (no commercial or retail here, it’s a unique opportunity to showcase Lino Lakes) Put all high density out away from existing developments No segregated communities, no high-rise apartments, connect Robinson to 4th Avenue, no Carl Street connection No high-density housing! No segregated communities. Larger lot sizes (1 acre+) Do not connect two cul-de-sacs No high-density housing. Protect Carl Street – can’t handle lots of traffic. This community is quiet and calm with lots of walking and biking. We like it that way. Prioritize eastbound connection onto 4th (one way). Use drainage easement and cover (pipe) Leave the Carl Street cul-de-sac as is Absolutely no Carl Street connection. Connect Robinson Drive to 4 th Avenue Leave Carl Street alone. Too many walkers and bicyclists – no reason to connect (praying for this) ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 1 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 44INDEX DRAFT Figure 4 Photo of project area map with comments at the open house Comments Received on the Comment Form • “1. Work with credible developers who have prior projects and are not convicted felons. 2. Do not allow developers to propose projects that are discriminatory. 3. Only allow development that is low density – no apartments, townhomes, and Del Webb style housing. 4. Include open space/green space as a focal point” • “I am concerned about the water table. I live in Arena Acres. We all have well and septic. We all like well and septic. My concern is when the developers pump the ground water to prepare for building. Who is liable for a well to dry up when pumping is going on? Natures refuge is going to pump in preparation to develop directly to our east. Thank you for the presentation tonight.” • “I purchased my property with the understanding that development would likely occur. I’m supportive of development as long as it is done thoughtfully and comprehensively. This large of a site (or combo of) proves lots of opposition to Met/support larger city goals. This area is a clear line from urban to rural and the associated regional impacts must have a mitigation plan. The open space preservation concept has lots of promise in my opinion with refinements on arrangement. The amenities of Lino Lakes are amazing, and we’d be happy to keep our property as is. However, we don’t want to be remaining doughnut hole of rural surrounded. Happy to engage further if/as needed to represent interests.” • “1. I would like to see slow development and larger residential lots to keep the uncrowded open feeling of other areas of the city. 2. My neighborhood has long term residents and well-kept houses because of how it has developed! Everyone has good things to say about how the city doesn’t rush into developing open areas! 3. My concerns for this area of development are costs to upgrade roads, etc. and the impact is having on current residents with increased use of city utilities which of course leads to more upgrades.” • “I would like to see existing Rice Creek Watershed Park trails have a trail go through this area to encourage bicycling and walking + a pedestrian bicycle bridge over Main Street so that bicycles and pedestrians don’t have to deal with car traffic. I am concerned that enough parking lot areas with many spots are provided for shops, stores, and community centers I like to look at the night sky where I live + see stars, so keep streetlights away to preserve the night sky so stars and planets are visible.” • “My vision for this area is the lowest possible density residential, preferably closer to rural than suburban, and plenty of green space. “High density” residential is not convergent with the character of the community, and we should push back on any dictates from the Met Council. If I wanted to live in an over-built suburb I’s have moved to Blaine. Many of the county roads that service the area are not well suited to the density you are proposing. Sunset Road and appropriate train system should be constructed before doing any more development at 125th/Main and Sunset. The intersection of Lilac and Sunset can already be problematic, and Sunset is ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 1 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 45INDEX DRAFT treacherous for pedestrians or cyclists. If you are going to have suburb-like density, you should have suburb-like infrastructure first. My property abuts the large pond in Behm’s Century Farm. The pond is connected to the Anoka County ditch system that runs through the proposed development area. In addition to being a haven for a variety of wildlife (including our city mascot), the pond is used recreationally by many families in the neighborhood. Any development needs to provide guarantees that they will not pollute the existing parks and waterways. In would be nice to have a continuous trail system connecting this area to City Hall/Rookery (trail on Lilac from Sunset to Apollo) and on Sunset from Main to the 109th roundabout (and preferably over the 35W bridge, but that’s a big ask).” • “I would like it to stay low density but that doesn’t seem to be possible. City seems to be bringing in high density + commercial building. I love that my neighborhood is quiet, and we have wildlife all around. Deer, turkeys, coyotes go through our yard. Trees all around. Congestion, traffic noise, lighting, loss of wildlife. Possibility for trails through wetlands/nature I am concerned about our well-being affected. I did speak with the City Engineer, and she assured me it won’t be a problem.” • “I feel that Lino should keep the high-density areas as far away from Main Street and Lake Drive. I cannot cross Lake Drive on a weekend or weekday as it is now. You are causing more accident potential and frustration.” • “1. My vision would be restoration of the land and impaired wetlands. 2. Careful attention will be given to ample wildlife habitat i.e., tree planting, milkweed, natural wetland plantings. Low light. 3. My neighborhood is quiet with ample space. Currently, it is a safe place for all of us to walk and bike however, once 77th gets re-routed, that will change. This is a frightening and depressing prospect. 4. My concerns re: this particular development is density. Lino is unique and we do not want dense developments and retail there. No apartments or multi-story buildings. No retail. We do not want to be Blaine. 5. Opportunities: South side retains a rural quality because it is so small, and Carl should not be a through street. 6. North side: senior villa homes, one story, low density.” • “Everyone who live in Lino moved here for the rural feel – low density, low light pollution. It was a real plus that buildings were not over 2 stories tall. Concerns: If planning is wrong and existing homes become a flood plain – who is responsible for the flood insurance for everyone impacted? Has anyone started the appeal process to the Met Council to get an exemption on density levels because of the high-water tables? If a residential/commercial high density is determined to be required – place it all together in one area where it would not be anywhere near existing homes/developments. More recent traffic studies were wrong on the impacts of new developments. What can be done to prepare for when new studies are found to be wrong as well? Why can’t the city council use existing authorized processes to enact the changes requested on the petition submitted summer ’24.” • “I’d rather see retail consolidated into existing developed retail areas, near Target or City Hall area. If eliminating retail from the 1,000-acre proposed development, it would allow for more housing of all types. Encourage smaller homes – no “McMansions”. Still accommodating density per acre would allow for more yard space as compared to eating up the lots with total footprint of a home. Encourage MTC public transportation access to any “affordable housing” i.e. apartments. Concerns about the walking trail crossing onto Lois Lare. Great to see Tom Hoffman on the team!” • “I have concerns about: o Unnecessary retail/commercial o Concentration of residential area (density) because of retail/commercial space o Traffic , especially during morning and evening commute times o Walker safety due to increased traffic o Height of apartment buildings amongst single family homes. Keep apartment buildings near 35W or 35E o Making sure to include lots of open and green space to keep the rural feeling of the area.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 1 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 46INDEX DRAFT • “My vision is to be consistent with the rest of Lino Lakes. Agricultural tourism, parks and low-density housing. I would like an improvement to have more bike paths and walking trails within the neighborhoods and along main streets. I love my neighborhood as I can bike to Target and 10+ miles of bike trails are close by. I used to like biking to blue Huron with my daughter to school, but then almost was hit crossing in front of the school. I would like more bike paths and signage of stoplights for walkers and bikers. I also like that my neighborhood is more spread out and houses are not stacked on each other. My concerns are traffic and water. Some days it is a death trap trying to take a left on 23. My daughter also has 34 kids in her class which is too much. Any developments should be slow, so schools are not impacted. For example, it took 10+ years for our 70-house development to be completed. I would love Lino Lakes to consider more agricultural tourism (Waldoch farms, Kavan’s Christmas tree farm) in that area. Or if not possible, homes spread out and low-density housing. We love the rural feel of Lino Lakes.” Figure 5 Photo of open house attendees filling out comment forms and viewing project boards ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 1 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 47INDEX DRAFT ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 1 Mapping Northwest Main – Open House 2 Summary Date/Location: Wednesday, February 5, 2025, 6-8 p.m. at The Rookery Activity Center Format: Open House Attendees: 60-70 Purpose: The goal of the open house was to present three planning scenarios for the project area with different density/land configurations, gather community feedback on the scenario, and continue educating the community about density and density requirements. Meeting Format: The open house was a come-and-go station concept with display boards and large printouts of the three planning scenarios. Attendees were invited to leave comments directly on the printouts with Post -it notes to describe what elements of the plan they may or may not like. Summary of Feedback and Comments Comment Themes: A total of 34 comments were received via the open house comment form, website comment form, comments left on the interactive map, and/or interactive map survey. The comments are summarized by theme below: Preferred Scenario: Figure 1 Bar graph showing the preferred scenarios based off comments received via open house and project website comment form, interactive map, and interactive map survey. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1 2 3 2 or 3 None Preferred Scenario 2 Thoughts on Density: • Associates high density with crime, low income housing, increased traffic and high structures • Preference for low density to keep the rural feel of Lino Lakes Design Preferences: • Prefer no high-rise buildings or Carl Street connection • Like the grand entrance feel scenario two provides while preserving the rural feel on Main Street Figure 2 Scenario 1 layout with Post-it note comments from Community Open House attendees Comments Received on Planning Scenario Maps at Community Open House Scenario 1: Comprehensive Plan ‘Full Build Out’ • “Sidewalks on Sunset please!” • “No Carl Street connection” • “No need to exit to Carl St. – too many walkers – no sidewalks planned!” Scenario 2: Gateway Village • “More commercial along Main Street and lighting” • “Drainage ditch moved more north” • “Sidewalk on Sunset” • “No Carl Street connection” MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 48INDEX DRAFT 3 Scenario 3: Preserving Open Space • “No Carl Street connection” • Add trail or sidewalk to Carl St.” Comments Received via Open House Comment Form Question: Which of the presented scenarios do you prefer? What opportunities do you see in your selected preferred scenario? Is there anything you would change? • 2/3: No comment • None: “We really need to focus on keeping green spaces. *We need to make sure developers have extensive experience!! I am not a fan of any of the designs” • 2: “The high density will be as far from us as possible.” • None: “None of the above, get rid of high density” • 2: “I like the idea of keeping the commercial aspect of the area kept to the west as a ‘Gateway’ to the city from that direction. After passing that area the community feel of Lino Lakes would still be intact.” • 3: “Park should be closer to the density. They pay for it & need it the most I really like the buffer separating structures from Main Can we have bike corridors that aren’t along roadways? Much more quite/enjoyable. ‘Green Corridor’” • None: “I would lean towards high end housing – priced enough so it does not turn into another crime ridden area like Blaine.” • 2: “Like grand entrance to Lin o Lakes, in all scenarios keep green space” • 1: “I would like to see high density moved closer to Main St. in consideration of the existing neighborhood + more low density + green space with trails. If backed into a corner I would say scenario 1 is the least offensive.” • 2: “I don’t see any opportunities, I like the fact the less density housing is close to the homes already built.” • 3: “Keeps Lino Lakes the way it is – rural/small town feel. That’s why we moved here 4 years ago. NO connection to Carl St. or connect cul-de-sacs – too many walkers/bicyclists on Carl St.” • 2: “In scenarios 2 + 3 I would not have the building too close to Main St.” • 2: “ – Like the civic identity that gateway provides . – Consider a big lake/pond worth of bird watching 4 Question: Do you see a benefit of having small scale commercial in the area? • “Very small – yes, something that supports the community” • “Yes if we don’t have multiples of similar businesses (i.e. – 5 coffee shops in a small radius) if we are opening space for business, let’s make sure its a variety” • “No, because we have gas, groceries, car repair, fast food and restaurants all within 2 miles of us.” • “No, too many shops sitting empty now. Move the commercial into existing shops, and reduce housing density in the area. Commercial areas draw crime.” • “Small scale commercial is a plus to reduce the need for residents to travel so far to get gas, etc. that small commercial offers. Also adds an opportunity to provide some jobs for residents in the area.” • “Yes. Please no gas station or drive thru. I wish I could walk to a place to eat.” • “Yes” • “No – Most likely another gas station or bank would go in. We have enough of them already. I’m not interested in having another fast food restaurant.” • “No.” • “No I don’t. There are already many commercial building in the area.” Question: What comes to your mind when you hear density? What do you like? What don’t you like? • “1st thing for high density that I think about is: the height of multi-fam buildings. LL is very spread out with many different densities – I would like it to ‘fit-in’ the existing look + feel of this area .” • “ - Section 8 housing usually takes over high density. - Focus on larger lots - We don’t need to have multiple high density complexes” • “Crime, large scale apartment buildings and traffic. I like the rural feel of our neighborhood. And for a dislike, I have trouble getting to Main.” • “Too many people! More congestions, more light pollution, more traffic noise • There’s a big open space by City Hall + the Rookery – put a high density unit there – access to stores, restaurants, gas stations and the freeway are already in place. Keep the NW quarter lower density” • “Lino Lakes has always done a good job with planning out land use so the term density just means a lot thought is going into the planning process! Keep up the good work! ” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 49INDEX DRAFT 5 • “I don’t mind density. I know it is a dirty word around here. The issue is there needs to be amenities. Parks, trail, eateries, jobs, transit, etc. Not just SFH” • “Minneapolis/St. Paul, crime, stress, congestion, Google – high population density stress” • “No high structures (> 3 -4 stories)” • “Lots of traffic, noise, lights. Less nature I don’t like the fact that we are being forced to build medium + high density. It seems like we have no say in the matter. Very frustrating Side note: It would be very helpful if the city would explain the Met Council, why we have to abide by their rules. Either put explanation on website or Quad Paper.” • “Low density” • “Structures close together. I like larger lots. 1 to 5 acres each.” Figure 3 Photo of project staff showing open house attendee Scenario 2 display board Comments Received via Website Comment Form • 4 comment forms were submitted through the website. Themes includes: o Desire to see an equal representation of high medium and low density distributed evenly between the two sod propertie s (north and south of Main Street) o Not in favor of connecting Carl Street and concerned if it was it would become a major throughfare with the proposed medium and high den sity in our area o Desire to not see low and cheap quality of homes built o Prefer Scenario 2: 6 ▪ See a benefit having small scale commercial and higher density on Main Street towards the western border of Lino Lakes and Blaine • It will be an easy flow between that area and the current developed land to the west in Blaine. ▪ The traffic for high density is consolidated along a major road and potentially will keep traffic from driving through other neighborhoods as there will be easy access to Main Street and Sunset (and over to Lexington Ave to access 35W.) ▪ The wetlands are mostly surrounded by low density housing, making them more visible if surrounded by larger structures. ▪ Each of the park areas are relatively close to high density area providing easy access to more residents. o Supportive of the regional trail connection on Main Street, and the two parks to be developed. o Concern about timing of development and current properties not ready to develop. o How does a mosque fit into these plans? o Keep “s” curves to a minimum, curved roads to slow traffic are good, but not “S” curves make it harder for the driver’s vision. o No desire for more large chain store, auto shop, fast food, bank or liquor store added. It’s a slippery slope to go down. o With traffic increasing, consideration for the safety of walkers and bikes via paved paths or sidewalks and public transportation. Comments Received on Interactive Map Scenario 1: • “In my opinion, this scenario makes the most sense as it seems to be blend in based on what is already existing. I think you could put higher density up against the Blaine boundary to better match what they have put in.” • “Most of the lots appear to be single family homes. In the past there was a law to stop development, which was highly correlated with the previous development plan to have a more ethnically diverse population. We should prioritize the intent of the previous development and consider low income housing and mixed use space, including religious institutions.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 50INDEX DRAFT 7 Scenario 2: • “I like #2 because it puts the commercial area next to blaine and gives them the chance to add more commercial to it. It would be nice to adopt a dark sky take on commercial and residential lighting. main st was always to see the northern lights, let’s keep it that way.” • “Coordination with the City of Blaine is needed for this scenario to look good. Doubtful Blaine will change their plan to fit this. I do like the idea of directing traffic towards a focal point – wither a park or lake. This scenario kind of entails that.” • “It feel like the commercial space is trying to escape Lino Lakes and seems difficult to get developers to commit to this vision. Seems to be cut in half. I think it might look good on paper but I can’t help but think this will look poorly planned, half baked, and incomplete in real life” • “This is a strong concept that maintains commercial visibility and accessibility from Main Street while also creating a distinct “gateway” and preserving of commercial- only zones at the intersection of Main and Sunset, instead of mixed -use residential/commercial areas.” • “The park is so far from the retail and even higher density areas. Being able to get a bite/drink and go to the park is a natural pairing. Park also generates foot traffic for business. The SFH has the least need for the park. Seems poorly located.” Scenario 3: • “Assuming wetland buffers are used along the road I really think this is the best option. Keep the housing set back a little so there is a little more of a ‘small town’ feel when driving through and more importantly, quitter more comfortable living options for those who live here.” Comments Received via Interactive Map Survey Question: Which of the scenarios do you prefer? What opportunities do you see in your preferred scenario? • Scenario 1: Two respondents selected this scenario • Scenario 2: Three respondents selected this scenario • Scenario 3: One respondent selected this scenario Question: What opportunities do you see in your preferred scenario? • Scenario 1: o “Businesses have higher visibility to Main Street. Put higher priced homes further back where there is less visibility.” 8 • Scenario 2: o “More consolidated along main street. Not affecting as much existing residential space.” o “Opportunities I see are keeping higher density housing/commercial zoning away from the existing residents/neighborhoods of Lino Lakes. The city should advocate that the proposed density of housing match the existing density that it will be developed next to.” o This is a strong concept that maintains commercial visibility and accessibility from Main street while also creating a distinct “gateway” and preserving open spaces.” • Scenario 3: o “I feel like this has the opportunity to lessen traffic congestion, which is the biggest concern. This will keep traffic spread out so that it is not right in one dense area.” Question: Is there anything you would change in your preferred scenario? • Scenario 1: o “Commercial or high density res. along Main street. Maybe we could get a grocery store or a couple restaurants here? Another starbucks?” o “Eliminate the high density housing, more green space” • Scenario 2: o “I would like to see direct feeder roads to main street. I see only connecting roads to existing residential roads.” o “Yes, the high density housing. As a property owner adjacent to the proposed development, I moved there for the rural life style/low density area and would hate to be pushed out due to the significant change.” o “I would like us to explore the possibility of commercial -only zones instead of mixed -use residential/commercial areas.” • Scenario 3: o “Honestly I think that possibly a combo Scenario 2 on the south side of Main Street and Scenario 3 on the north side might work the best. This keeps traffic in already built in neighborhoods on the south of Main Street to the main roads, rather than some of the high density traffic cutting through those neighborhoods. This also makes it so the high density areas are not all in one spot and will still make the drive and area feel more open.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 51INDEX DRAFT 9 Question: Do you see a benefit of having small scale commercial in this area? • “No, there is plenty of shopping and restaurants nearby some space sits empty.” • “Yes.” • “No, there are plenty of commercial zoned areas within 5 minutes of this area and even more within 10 minutes.” • “No” • “I think small or even medium. Not bib box, but more than just neighborhood business.” • “I do not. It doesn’t fit in the area. Commercial should be kept toward Lake Drive or Lexington Avenue where there are easy outlets to the interstate and you don’t have the potential of higher volumes of traffic going through residential areas.” Question: What comes to mind when you hear density? What do you like? What don’t you like? • “Big cities are dense. Lino lakes doesn’t have to be.” • “Density – how many people you pack into an area. I’m more of an non -packed person. Sure I work for developers, but I’d rather not live in what I work in. Keep all of that density towards Main please ” • “I like the idea to develop the land within reason. I think it should be similar to the existing density of the city and surrounding area. I think the city should push for larger lots and larger homes for lower density.” • “Lino Lakes is an exurb; we shouldn’t have “high density” housing and the Met Council should mind their own business. Building out to this degree will destroy the character of the community and overwhelm the infrastructure.” • “I like density when it is used to preserve open space. I also think density can compliment commercial uses.” • “I don’t like high density. That mean more traffic, more congestion, more resources (water, sewer, public safety) used in a smaller area. It also means more noise and less safety for children. I’d like to see as low of density as possible.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 2 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 52INDEX DRAFT ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 3 1 Mapping Northwest Main – Open House 3 Summary Date/Location: Wednesday, March 19, 2025, 6 -8 p.m. at The Rookery Activity Center Format: Open House Attendees: ~76 Purpose: The goal of the open house was to share the preferred planning scenario and gather community feedback on specific elements of the scenario, such as roadway and trail networks, drainage routes, and the greenway system. Meeting Format: The open house was a come-and-go station concept with display boards and large printouts of the design aspects of the preferred planning scenario. Attendees were invited to leave comments directly on the printouts with Post -it notes to describe what elements of the scenario they may or may not like. Summary of Feedback and Comments Comment Themes: A total of 24 comments were received via the open house comment form, post its on project layouts, website comment form, and comments left on the interactive map. The comments are summarized by theme below: Traffic and vehicle safety: • Concern that development will increase in traffic near the proposed residential/commercial and high-density areas • Concern that the increase in cars and traffic will be noisy • Existing issues, such as cars failing to yield and dangerous merging, will be exasperated by development • Concern for traffic along Main Street • Safety concerns for pedestrians crossing roads Trail connectivity and sidewalks : • Desire for new sidewalks and trails • Excitement for the trail connections proposed in the preferred scenario 2 • Desire for connections to community amenities such as the parks and commercial area Nature and green spaces: • Concern that development will negatively impact local wildlife • Desire to preserve open and green space • Concern about development’s impact on existing water resources Property impacts: • Confusion about greenways drawn over existing properties in the preferred scenario • Concern that the area will change if neighbors sell to developers Comments Received on Planning Scenario Maps at Community Open House Proposed Roadway Network • “Concerned about an increase of traffic with this new plan. We have no sidewalks on Pinto /Mustang Ln. Already dangerous to walk down these roads. Don’t recommend median on Sunset” (comment located on Mustang Ln & Pinto Ln intersection south of study area). • “Concerned about crossing Main at 4th Ave with increased traffic. Stoplight maybe?”(comment located on Main Street just outside of E study area boundary) • “2040 would be a good timing for Pine St” (comment located on Pine St on the N boundary of study area) Proposed Trail Network • “I would like this trial continued” (comment located on Main Street just outside of E study area boundary) Proposed Drainage Routes • “Noise barrier with trees would be ideal” (comment located on Carl Street near the E study area boundary) • “More separation between Main St and trail (waterway) or trees” (comment located on central Main Street) • “Move the park closer to commercial” (comment located near planned residential/commercial use) • “Keep traffic closer to Main where there is more high density ” (comment located near the northern proposed park) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 53INDEX DRAFT 3 • “Should have developer put a park in each of these neighborhoods” (comment located on 4th Ave) Proposed Greenway • “Left turns from Main to 4th dangerous with passing on shoulders” (comment located on Main Street just outside of E study area boundary) • “Add light to the existing power pole at Pine” (comment located on Pine Street along N study area boundary Figure 2: 2.1 Scenario proposed drainage routes layout with comments Comments Received via Open House Comment Form Question: Please share your thoughts on the preferred scenario or any other questions or comments you have on the Master Plan / AUAR • From what I am seeing so far, this seems like a great vision! Some things I would like to see more of in Lino Lakes (and perhaps this is something you could use in the concept) are the following: 1. More pedestrian/biking paths/sidewalks/etc. walking on the streets is far from ideal and yet it’s the only option we have as residents on Main St. 4 2. High-density housing types – we are in a housing crisis and this I think we ought to consider making efforts to provide more. I would be in favor of even higher-density options than are being presented now. Apartments would be a great way to provide more housing while also allowing more people to enjoy all that Lino has to offer 12 3. Even more trails/greenway systems. The more space we have to safely move our bodies is great! 4. Dog park?? As dog owners that would be such a lovely perk. Would be nice to have something close by rather than having to drive to neighboring cities. • Please continue low density to the east! We have well on east end • I don’t believe the average citizen understands what all the term “residential” includes. I believe most people think that just means some form of housing, not schools, churches, etc… • For us, the plan is moving in the right direction. One last major request – please leave Carl St alone! Thank you for everything. • We are concerned about the added traffic that will occur on Main Street and 4 th Ave. 4th Ave has a lot of speeding as is, we do a lot of biking and walking on 4 th. We enjoy the beauty of the area and quietness. We are worried how this will take away from the serene fo the area. Main Street is dangerous at times to turn off of. People pass on the shoulder all the time, adding more cars on the road is worrisome. Lastly, I am sad to lose the wildlife. Removing their habitat remove the wildlife we moved here for. It feels like what we moved here for is being taken from us to make room for others to replace us. • The paths/trails you have planned along Main Street need to be moved farther away or place more trees between the road and the path. If you walk along the path on Main Street through Centerville by the lakes, it is not enjoyable. Very loud because of the traffic. • Would like to appear not packed in – importance of green space. Concern about affect on the wells on Pine St. • Like the low density proposals and the trails being proposed. ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 3 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 54INDEX DRAFT 5 Figure 2: Photo of project staff showing open house attendee Scenario 2 display board Comments Received via Website Comment Form • 1 comment form was submitted through the website: o Concern that another large commercial area with stores such as Target and Kohls will chop up Lino Lakes. Staff explained that the businesses in the commercial will be neighborhood-scale and not include large-scale stores Comments Received on Interactive Map Scenario 2.1: • “There is already a lot of traffic on Robinson Dr and Century Trail and connecting this road to the commercial zone will add additional traffic that will make the roads more unsafe for families and children. The purple commercial zones should be accessed from Main St since that road is more appropriate for volume traffic. Neighborhoods should also have natural separation like multiple rows of trees to provide an aesthetically pleasing view when looking out your windows or playing in backyards instead of high density housing and apartment complexes with little nature.” • “Having high density in the middle of low density seems like a future traffic nightmare. This high density backs up to 20 -40acre personal properties of private homeowners that are trying to preserve the land for nature and personal use. Keeping all high density close to Main Street to help detour wildlife makes the most sense, along with the future congestion high density will bring. Low density the 6 further you go into the north side of this land to actually attempt to preserve the land, like the current homeowners are doing on Pine Street.” • “As someone that lives here, anything that cuts through our properties is unacceptable. Do residents realize that this is already a residential area? The city is making plans for an area where people already live and are not happy about this. The fact that the city is looking to potentially take land away from people is insane. We do not want to be developed.” ATTACHMENT B - ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES (CONT.) OPEN HOUSE 3 MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 55INDEX DRAFT Figure 2-4� High Priority Wetlands 2-7 Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 2-4 High Priority Wetlands Legend City of Centerville High Priority Wetlands Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 1/22/2018 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 56INDEX DRAFT 3-5 Figure 3-1� Full Build Land Use Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456754 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 20 t h A v e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n S t Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St Ci t y o f B l a i n e City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North Oaks White Bear Township ´ Figure 3-1 Full Build Out Land Use Legend City of Centerville Permanent Rural Low Density Residential Low Density Mixed Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Planned Residential / Commercial Office Residential Signature Gateway District Commercial Town Center Business Campus Industrial Civic and Institutional Parks and Open Space Private Airfield Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 2/7/201911/9/2020 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 57INDEX DRAFT 6-13 Figure 6-5. Proposed Functional Classification System !? !? !? 1 Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 6-5 Proposed Functional Classification System Legend City of Centerville !?Future Full Access Interchange 1 Future Overpass Existing Functional Class Principal Arterial A-Minor Arterial Reliever A-Minor Arterial Expander A-Minor Arterial Connector Other Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Functional Class Principal Arterial* A-Minor Arterial Expander Other Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 2/26/2020 *Post 2040 11/9/2020 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 58INDEX DRAFT 7-12 Figure 7-9 Floodplain Districts Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau Lake Rice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e JD 2 JD 3 A C D 7 2 ACD 55 JD 3 ACD 2 5 RCD 8 AC D 1 0 - 2 2 - 3 2 RC D 8 §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview AmeilaBaldwin Centerville Clearwater Creek Deep George Watch Hardwood Creek Marshan Middle RiceCreek Peltier Reshanau Rice Lake Sherman Upper Rice Creek Wilkinson Rondeau Har d w o o d C r e e k C l e a r w a t e r C r e e k Ri c e C r e e k ´ Figure 7-9 Floodplain Districts Legend City of Centerville General Floodplain (Zone A) Flood Fringe (Zone AE) Floodway (Zone AE) 500-year Floodplain (Zone X) Public Ditch Tile, Public Ditch Private Ditch DNR Public Watercourse Resource Management Units Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 1/22/2018 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 59INDEX DRAFT 10-5 Figure 10-1� Parks, Greenways & Trail System !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj ú ú ú Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t A v e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e Rd W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St A B C D E I J H F GK L M N White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview !2 !3 !4 !5 !7 !10 !11 !12 !13 !14 !15 !16 !17 !19 !20 !21 !22 !23 !24 !25 !26 !18 !1 !6 !8 !9 ´ Figure 10-1 Parks, Greenways & Trail System Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Park Search Area's ú Existing Tunnel ú Proposed Tunnel/Bridge Water Trail NE Drainage Outlet Existing Asphalt Existing Concrete Trail Existing Boardwalk Trail Proposed Trails !(!(!(!(!(¾¾½Proposed On-Street Route Existing Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Greenway System Undeveloped Park City Parks Regional Parks Open Water Municipal Boundary Parcels Streams 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 11/12/2019 1 Arena Acres Park 10 Sunrise Park 19 Birchwood Acres 2 Wollan Park 11 Rice Lake Estates 20 West Shadow Ponds O/S 3 City Hall Park 12 Country Lakes Park 21 Reshanau Lake Estates O/S 4 Century Farm North 13 Quail Ridge Property 22 Birch Park 5 Behm's Park 14 Pheasants Hill Park 23 Brandywood Park 6 Highland Meadow Park 15 North Pointe Park 24 Recreation Complex 7 Lino Park 16 Clearwater Creek O/S 25 Woods of Baldwin Park 8 Sunset Oaks Park 17 Clearwater Creek Park 26 Wenzel Famrs Park 9 Marshan Park 18 Shenandoah Park 11/9/2020 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 60INDEX DRAFT 10-39 Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " "" "" " " " " " "" "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " "" " " " " " " " " " " """ "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj Baldwin Lake A B C D E I J H F GK L M N Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456723 456714 456754 456754 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e Dr Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apol l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e R d Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St White Bear Township Ci t y o f B l a i n e Ci t y o f C i r c l e P i n e s City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North OaksCity of Shoreview ´ Figure 10-3 Greenway System Plan Legend City of Centerville kj Future Neighborhood Parks "Major Drainage Routes "Minor Drainage Routes Greenway System Natural Resource Conservation Area Natural Resource Enhancement Area Parks Wetlands Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 3/12/201911/9/2020 ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 61INDEX DRAFT 11-7 Figure 11-3� School Districts Baldwin Lake Rondeau Lake Bald Eagle Lake Wilkinson Lake Otter Lake Amelia Lake Reshanau LakeRice Lake Centerville Lake Marshan Lake George Watch Lake Peltier Lake Cedar Lake Lilac St 20 t h A v e S 456721 456749 456721 456749 456714 456754 456714 456723 456721 456721 456714456714 20 t h Av e 20 t h A v e §¨¦35E §¨¦35W ")53 ")153 ")140 ")84 ")84 Main St Ma i n St Main St Cedar St Ho d g s o n Rd La k e D r Elm St Birch St Birch St Lak e D r Su n s e t Av e Ro n d e a u La k e D r E Ash St Oak Ln Apo l l o D r 62nd St N Ash St Ro n d e a u La k e R d W Ce n t e r v i l l e Rd Ho l l y D r 4t h A v e Holly Dr E Birch St 80th St E 64th St Ci t y o f B l a i n e City of Columbus Ci t y o f H u g o City of North Oaks White Bear Township BLUE HERON ELEMENTARY & CENTENNIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL RICE LAKE ELEMENTARY LINO LAKES ELEMENTARY ´ Figure 11-3 School Districts Legend City of Centerville ISD 12 Centennial ISD 831 Forest Lake ISD 624 White Bear Lake Open Water Right-of-Way Municipal Boundary Parcels 3,500 0 3,5001,750 Feet Date: 1/31/2018 ISD 831 Forest Lake ISD 12 Centennial ISD 624 White Bear Lake Schools ST U D Y AR E A EXHIBIT FROM THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. ATTACHMENT C - 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (SELECT EXHIBITS) (CONT.) MAPPING NORTHWEST MAIN - MAIN STREET MASTER PLAN JULY 2, 2025 | 62INDEX DRAFT DRAFT