HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/08/2025 P & Z Minutes
CITY OF LINO LAKES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES
DATE: October 8, 2025
TIME STARTED: 6:30 P.M.
TIME ENDED: 7:28 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Isaac Wipperfurth, Nathan Vojtech, Neil Evenson
Michael Root, Suzy Guthmueller, Perry Laden,
Patrick Kohler
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen, Kris Keller, Marissa
Ertel
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Root called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
on October 8, 2025.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
Chair Root declared public comment open at 6:30 p.m.
There was no one present for public comments.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Board recommended updates to the September 10, 2025 minutes. The September
th
10, 2025 minutes will be presented at the November 12 meeting.
6. ACTION ITEMS
Planning & Zoning Board
October 8, 2025
Page 2
A. Continued Public Hearing: Peltier Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
Rezoning, PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat
Ms. Larsen presented the staff report.
The applicant, U.S. Home, LLC (aka Lennar), is proposing a master planned residential
development located west of CSAH 54 (20th Ave N) across from Watermark, east of
Peltier Lake, and north of the City of Centerville border. The development contains four
(4) parcels totaling approximately 125 gross acres and 246 housing units. The proposed
development is called Peltier Ponds.
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on July 9, 2025 and recommended
continuing the public hearing to allow the applicant time to provide additional
information. The Board continued the public hearing again on August 13, 2025 and
September 10, 2025. The applicant continues to work on the revised plans and needs
additional time to complete.
Mr. Wipperfurth moved to continue the public hearing to the next Planning and Zoning
meeting to allow the developer time to address staff concerns. Motion seconded by Mr.
Kohler. Motion carried 7-0.
B. Public Hearing: Lino Lakes Dealership and Offices
Ms. Larsen presented the staff report.
The applicant, Tyler Huebsch, submitted a land use application for Lino Lakes Dealership
and Offices. The proposed development is a motor vehicle sales lot and office building.
The property address is 7920 Lake Drive.
Mr. Evenson wanted to confirm that since there is a proposed car dealership along with
the office building that is what is prompting the need for a CUP. Ms. Larsen confirmed
that they would not if it was just an office building.
Mr. Laden had questions regarding the definition of dimming the lights after hours and
the necessity of keeping the lights on overnight. Ms. Larsen stated that the lights should
stay on from a security standpoint. Mr. Laden would like for there to be a defined light
dimming level. This would be something to bring forward to City Council as a condition.
Planning & Zoning Board
October 8, 2025
Page 3
Mr. Wipperfurth also wanted to know if the stormwater pond needed to be redesigned
due to the trail easement. Ms. Larsen confirmed that they would have to redesign the
stormwater pond with the staff recommendations for the trail easement.
Mr. Wipperfurth would like to know what maintenance free fencing means. Ms. Larsen
stated that the City does not have a definition of maintenance free. Mr. Wipperfurth
would like the City to come up with a definition for future applicants.
Mr. Vojtech wanted to know which side the landscaping would go on along the privacy
fence. Ms. Larsen stated that the landscaping would go on the east, towards the
residential side.
Ms. Guthmueller wanted to know what the signage would look like for the building. Ms.
Larsen stated that there is a sign ordinance, but the ordinance does not have any
aesthetic verbiage. Ms. Guthmueller thinks the City should include language for
aesthetics to the sign ordinance.
The applicant, Tyler Huebsch, was present to answer questions.
Mr. Evenson had questions about whether this type of building is common. Mr. Huebsch
stated that this is a common practice in the industry.
Mr. Evenson wondered if the building would be fully rented. Mr. Huebsch stated that he
is hoping that the building would be filled with multiple types of tenants.
Mr. Vojtech wanted to know the purpose of the out-bay. Mr. Huebsch stated that the
purpose would be to prepare the vehicles for sale.
Mr. Root wanted to know what types of vehicles would fit in the lot. Mr. Huebsch stated
most vehicles would fit, trucks, sedans and SUVs. Mr. Root wanted to know how the
vehicles would be obtained. Mr. Heubsch stated that they would be purchased by
private dealers.
Mr. Vojtech wanted to know if a semitruck would fit in the parking lot, for vehicle drop
offs. Mr. Huebsch stated that it would not be necessary for a semitruck to enter the
parking lot.
Mr. Vojtech wanted to understand the placement of the trash receptacle. Mr. Huebsch
stated it would be convenient for the tenants of the offices and for ease of access for
the trash companies.
Mr. Root opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
Planning & Zoning Board
October 8, 2025
Page 4
There was no one present for the public hearing.
Mr. Vojtech motioned to close the public hearing. Mr. Wipperfurth seconded. The public
hearing was closed at 7:06 p.m.
Mr. Wipperfurth had concerns that in the future there could be sales of large non-
passenger vehicles, such as semitrucks. Ms. Larsen stated that language would be
included in the CUP that would state that only the sale of passenger vehicles would be
allowed.
Mr. Wipperfurth wanted to know if this could potentially become a singular dealership
and if there would be a way to restrict large vehicles such as semitrucks from parking on
the streets. Ms. Larsen stated that if this became an issue it could be brought back
before the Board and reevaluated.
Mr. Laden stated he appreciated the architecture and thought behind the design of the
building.
Mr. Root stated he would be comfortable if this was in an industrial district or just an
office building but does not feel he could support the conditional use permit for motor
vehicle sales with it being so close to residential homes.
Mr. Laden moved to approve the conditional use permit and site and building plan
review with staff recommendations and Board recommendations including:
A defined dimmed light level
Limiting the sale to passenger vehicles only
A definition of maintenance free materials
Motion was seconded by Mr. Kohler. Motion carried 6-1.
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Main Street Master Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Mr. Grochala provided an update on the Main Street Master Plan Comprehensive Plan
Amendment.
Mr. Wipperfurth wanted to know whether this would include language about street
connections. Mr. Grochala stated the comprehensive plan amendment would not
include street connections.
B. Project Updates
Planning & Zoning Board
October 8, 2025
Page 5
Mr. Grochala provided project updates to the Board.
Mr. Wipperfurth moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Mr. Laden.
Meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Marissa Ertel – Community Development Administrative Assistant