HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/27/2012 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 27, 2012
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Roeser, Rafferty & Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 5:30 P.M.
Community Room (not televised)
1. Otter Lake Road Extension Improvement Project
(from 2 -13 -12 Hearing)
2. Peddler Regulations
3. Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL
• Call to Order — 6:30 p.m.
Roll Call - Council Members Stoesz, O'Donnell, Roeser & Rafferty, and Mayor
Reinert were present
➢ Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge was led by Boy Scout Troup #626
➢ Open Mike / Public Comment
None
➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
The agenda was amended to remove Item 6A for more discussion at a
work session
CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 27, 2012 (Check No. 92759 through
92870) in the amount of $220,574.25;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 5207 through
5225) in the amount of $15,378.52
Pg 11 -23
B) Consider approval of Feb. 6, 2012 Work Session Minutes Pg 24 -30
C) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Council Meeting Minutes Pg 31 -35
D) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Special Session Minutes Pg 36 -38
Council Agenda
-2- February 27, 2012
EXPANDED AGENDA
E) Consider Resolution No. 12 -13, Extension of Time of the Pg 39 -41
Conditional Use Permits and for Submittal of the Planned
Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat, Main Street Village
F) Consider Resolution No. 12 -14, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 42 -44
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
The Preserve
G) Consider Resolution No. 12 -15, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 45 -47
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
Moon Marsh
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Roeser,
to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1G, as
presented, was adopted
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 11
A) Consider Resolution No. 12 -19, Authorizing the Centennial Pg 48 -50
Fire District Chief to Explore Legislative Changes to Allow for
Local Control of Ambulance Services, Jeff Karlson
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Roeser,
to approve Resolution No. 12 -19, as presented, was adopted
B) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12, Amending Pg 51 -55
Title 700, Chapters 701 and 702, of the Lino Lakes Code of
Ordinances regarding Liquor and Beer, adding Off -Sale
Growler license, Julie Bartell
Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Rafferty,
to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12,
as presented, was adopted
C) Consider participation in application for deicing grant through Pg 55a
Rice Creek Watershed District Urban Stormwater Remediation
Cost - Sharing Program, Jeff Karison
Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Stoesz,
to approve city participation, was adopted
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
5 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
Council Agenda
-3- February 27, 2012
EXPANDED AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Zoning Amendment Section 6 Residential Zoning Districts Pg 56 106
i. Consider 2r . - ! - •. ' - . ! • • - _
Section 6, Residential Districts of the Zoning Ordinance,
Paul Bengtson
ii. Consider Resolution No. 12 16, Summarizing Ordinance
No. 03 12 for publication purposes Paul Bengtson
B) Consider Resolution No. 12 -20, Revoking Non - existing Rehbeins Pg 107 -109
Street and Non - existing 73rd Street Extensions from Municipal
State Aid Street System, Jason Wedel
Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by O'Donnell,
to approve Resolution No. 12 -20, as presented, was adopted
C) Consider Resolution No. 12 -21, Approving Notice of Intent to Pg 110 -112
Bond, 2012 Intersection Signal Improvements, Michael Grochala\
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Roeser,
to approve Resolution No. 12 -21, as presented, was adopted
D) Consider Resolution No. 12 -22, Authorizing Execution of Pg 113 -114
Appraisal Services Contract with BRWK Appraisals Inc.,
Otter Lake Road Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Roeser,
to approve Resolution No. 12 -22, as presented, was adopted
NE
[NISHED BUSINESS
None
BUSINESS
Adjournment
None
Motion by Roeser, seconded by Rafferty, to adjourn at 6:52 p.m.,
was adopted
The council convened to a special session in the Community Room
Community Calendar — A Look Ahead
February 27, 2012 through March 12, 2012
4V Tuesday, February 28
Monday, March 5
Monday, March 5
Monday, March 12
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
5:30 pm, Community Room
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
Environmental Board
Park Board
Work Session
City Council Meeting
•
REVISED
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 27, 2012
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Roeser, Rafferty & Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
CIL WORK SESSION, 5:30
Community Room (not televised)
1. Otter Lake Road Extension Improvement Project
(from 2 -13 -12 Hearing)
2. Peddler Regulations
3. Review Regular Agenda
TY COUNCIL MEETING, '6:30 P.l\
• Call to Order and Roll Call
➢ Pledge of Allegiance
• Open Mike / Public Comment
➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
CONSE NT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 27, 2012 (Check No. 92759 through
92870) in the amount of $220,574.25;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 5207 through
5225) in the amount of $1 5,378.52
Pg 11 -23
B) Consider approval of Feb. 6, 2012 Work Session Minutes Pg 24 -30
C) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Council Meeting Minutes Pg 31 -35
D) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Special Session Minutes Pg 36 -38
E) Consider Resolution No. 12 -13, Extension of Time of the Pg 39 -41
Conditional Use Permits and for Submittal of the Planned
Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat, Main Street
Village
Council Agenda
-2-
REVISED
February 27, 2012
F) Consider Resolution No. 12 -14, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 42 -44
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
The Preserve
G) Consider Resolution No. 12 -15, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 45 -47
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
Moon Marsh
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 12 -19, Authorizing the Centennial Pg 48 -50
Fire District Chief to Explore Legislative Changes to Allow for
Local Control of Ambulance Services, Jeff Karlson
B) Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12, Amending
Title 700, Chapters 701 and 702, of the Lino Lakes Code of
Ordinances regarding Liquor and Beer, adding Off -Sale
Growler license, Julie Bartell
Pg 51 -55
C) Consider participation in application for deicing grant through Pg 55a
Rice Creek Watershed District Urban Stormwater Remediation
Cost - Sharing Program, Jeff Karlson
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT
No report
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
A) Zoning Amendment — Section 6 — Residential Zoning Districts Pg 56 -106
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -12, Amending
Section 6, Residential Districts of the Zoning Ordinance,
Paul Bengtson
*Council may vote to dispense with full reading of ordinance
* Roll call vote is required for adoption of the ordinance
ii. Consider Resolution No. 12 -16, Summarizing Ordinance
No. 03 -12 for publication purposes — Paul Bengtson
B) Consider Resolution No. 12 -20, Revoking Non - existing Rehbeins Pg 107 -109
Street and Non - existing 73`d Street Extensions from Municipal
State Aid Street System, Jason Wedel
•
•
•
Council Agenda
-3-
REVISED
February 27, 2012
C) Consider Resolution No. 12 -21, Approving Notice of Intent to
Bond, 2012 Intersection Signal Improvements, Michael Grochala
D) Consider Resolution No. 12 -22, Authorizing Execution of
Appraisal Services Contract with BRWK Appraisals Inc.,
Otter Lake Road Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
Pg 110 -112
Pg 113 -114
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Upon adjournment of the regular meeting, the council will convene to a special session in the
Community Room
Community Calendar — A Look Ahead
February 27, 2012 through March 12, 2012
4- Tuesday, February 28
4- Monday, March 5
4- Monday, March 5
4- Monday, March 12
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
5:30 pm, Community Room
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
Environmental Board
Park Board
Work Session
City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Monday, February 27, 2012
* *** *** ****
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Roeser, Rafferty & Stoesz
City Administrator: Jeff Karlson
COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 5:30 P.M.
Community Room (not televised)
1. Otter Lake Road Extension Improvement Project
(from 2 -13 -12 Hearing)
2. Peddler Regulations
3. Review Regular Agenda
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6 :30 P.M.
➢ Call to Order and Roll Call
➢ Pledge of Allegiance
➢ Open Mike / Public Comment
➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. CONSENT AGENDA
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February 27, 2012 (Check No. 92759 through
92870) in the amount of $220,574.25;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 5207 through
5225) in the amount of $15,378.52
Pg 11 -23
B) Consider approval of Feb. 6, 2012 Work Session Minutes Pg 24 -30
C) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Council Meeting Minutes Pg 31 -35
D) Consider approval of Feb. 13, 2012 Special Session Minutes Pg 36 -38
E) Consider Resolution No. 12 -13, Extension of Time of the Pg 39 -41
Conditional Use Permits and for Submittal of the Planned
Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat, Main Street
Village
Council Agenda
-2- February 27, 2012
F) Consider Resolution No. 12 -14, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 42 -44
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
The Preserve
G) Consider Resolution No. 12 -15, Extension of Time for Submittal Pg 45 -47
of the Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat,
Moon Marsh
2. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, Al Rolek
No report
3. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT
A) Consider Resolution No. 12 -19, Authorizing the Centennial Pg 48 -50
Fire District Chief to Explore Legislative Changes to Allow for
Local Control of Ambulance Services, Jeff Karlson
B) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12, Amending
Title 700, Chapters 701 and 702, of the Lino Lakes Code of
Ordinances regarding Liquor and Beer, adding Off -Sale
Growler license, Julie Bartell
4. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, John Swenson
No report
5. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, Rick DeGardner
No report
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, Michael Grochala
Pg 51 -55
A) Zoning Amendment — Section 6 — Residential Zoning Districts Pg 56 -106
i. Consider 2 "d Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -12, Amending
Section 6, Residential Districts of the Zoning Ordinance,
Paul Bengtson
*Council may vote to dispense with full reading of ordinance
* Roll call vote is required for adoption of the ordinance
ii. Consider Resolution No. 12 -16, Summarizing Ordinance
No. 03 -12 for publication purposes — Paul Bengtson
B) Consider Resolution No. 12 -20, Revoking Non - existing Rehbeins Pg 107 -109
Street and Non - existing 73`d Street Extensions from Municipal
State Aid Street System, Jason Wedel
C) Consider Resolution No. 12 -21, Approving Notice of Intent to Pg 110 -112
Bond, 2012 Intersection Signal Improvements, Michael Grochala
•
•
•
Council Agenda
-3- February 27, 2012
D) Consider Resolution No. 12 -22, Authorizing Execution of Pg 113 -114
Appraisal Services Contract with BRWK Appraisals Inc.,
Otter Lake Road Improvement Project, Michael Grochala
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
8. NEW BUSINESS
None
Adjournment
Upon adjournment of the regular meeting, the council will convene to a special session in the
Community Room
Community Calendar — A Look Ahead
February 27, 2012 through March 12, 2012
Tuesday, February 28
4. Monday, March 5
4. Monday, March 5
1. Monday, March 12
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
5:30 pm, Community Room
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
Environmental Board
Park Board
Work Session
City Council Meeting
•
WS — Item 1
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item 1
Date: February 27, 2012
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala
Re: Otter Lake Road Extension
Background
The public hearing on improvements for the Otter Lake Road Improvements project was held on
February 13, 2012 City Council meeting. Testimony was received by both property owners
proposed to be assessed as part of the project. Comments were also received from neighboring
property owners. The council held off on any action until further discussion at the February 27,
2012 meeting.
As previously discussed the proposed project is located within a Charter exempt area therefore
the improvement process follows Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Accordingly the council
may take the following steps:
1. Take no action
2. Request additional information
3. Authorize preparation of plans and specifications
The project will likely be funded through the issuance of general obligation improvement bonds
and specially assessed against two benefitting property owners. One of the property owners has
previously indicated their opposition to the proposed improvement. Accordingly the council
may wish to obtain additional information such as land appraisals and or a special benefit
analysis prior to moving forward with the more costly preparation of plans and specifications.
This information may assist the council in assessing the potential financial risk in moving
forward with the project. The project is reliant on special assessments for repayment of any
bonds issued to support the project. If the specials cannot be substantiated then any short falls
would need to be covered by property tax levy. Staff has included authorization to retain the
services of BRKW Appraisals Inc., for consideration 011 the regular agenda.
To move the project forward the council would need to order the preparation of plans and
specifications. This involves detailed design of improvements, determination of construction
impacts, and development of detailed cost estimates. The right -of -way acquisition process
would also be commenced during the plan development. Estimated costs for preparation of
plans and specifications are $40,000 to $60,000.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting council direction regarding preferred action.
P1
•
WS — Item #2
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item #2
Date:
To: City Council
From: Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Re: Peddler Regulations
Background
At the February 13, 2012 City Council some questions were posed during Open Mic
regarding the City's regulations on door to door peddling /soliciting. The council
requested that staff provide an update on the city's regulations.
Chapter 613 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances entitled Transient Merchant, Peddler,
Canvasser and Solicitor contains the city's regulations. When a request is received to
sell in the city, we determine how the regulations will apply to the requested activity.
A commercial activity of selling goods or seeking orders either door to door or at
a fixed location as a transient merchant requires a city permit. The cost is $250
for up to six months and the process is explained in the attached email;
- The regulations exclude certain activities (i.e. sales by school children, sales by
appointment) from the definition meaning that no city license is required;
Regulations exempt certain religious /charitable work from licensing but requires
that the organization submit information about their activities for city review;
- Individuals exercising their Constitutional rights (speech, press, religion) not in
conjunction with a commercial activity are exempted from city regulations;
The city allows the distribution of flyers door -to -door with a notification foam
submitted to the city (no knocking — just distribution allowed);
State statute allows the sale of products of the farm or garden occupied and
cultivated by the seller without a license.
Note that city policy requires that all individuals that fall under the city's regulations are
required to submit to a background check.
Requested Council Direction
No action is requested unless the council has interest in changing the current regulations.
Attachments
Peddler License Information
Chapter 613 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances
P2
P3
Julie Bartell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Julie Bartell
Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:23 PM
Peddler License Information
In response to your request for information on obtaining a peddler's license for door -to -door sales in the City of Lino Lakes, I am
forwarding the following information:
• An application for a peddler's license. A single application may be submitted on behalf of a company to cover its
employees or agents, however a personal history form (as follows) is required of each agent or employee.
• A personal history form to be duplicated and completed by all individuals who would be working in Lino Lakes; please
note that this form requires a notarized signature and a recent photo of the individual should be attached.
> A copy of the City of Lino Lakes regulations concerning transient merchants, peddlers, canvassers and solicitors (City
Code, Chapter 612); Please review these regulations.
These forms must be completed and returned to City Hall along with:
➢ A check for $250 (license fee for a six month period);
When the application process is complete and background checks are approved, your request can be presented to the City
Council for their consideration.
Be aware that if you contract for any work in the City of Lino Lakes, a city or state contractor license is required. •
Peddler's License Personal History Chapter613.doc
A.pp.doc Forma - Peddle,..
Julie Bartell
City Clerk
City -of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
651 - 982 -2406
651- 982 -2499 fax
julie. bartellci.lino- lakes. mn. us
1
•
•
CHAPTER 613: TRANSIENT
MERCHANT, PEDDLER, CANVASSER
AND SOLICITOR
Section
613.01 Definitions
613.02 Exceptions to definitions
613.03 Religious and charitable organizations
613.04 Licensing; exemptions
613.05 License ineligibility
613.06 License suspension and revocation
613.07 License transferability
613.08 Prohibited activities
613.09 Penalties
§ 613.01 DEFINITIONS.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context
clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.
PEDDLER. A person who goes from house -to- house, door -to -door, business -to- business,
street -to -street or any other type of place -to- place, for the purpose of offering for sale, displaying
or exposing for sale, selling or attempting to sell and delivering immediately upon sale, the
goods, wares, products, merchandise or other personal property that the person is carrying or
otherwise transporting. The term PEDDLER shall mean the same as the teem hawker.
PERSON. Any natural individual, group, organization, corporation, partnership or
association. As applied to groups, organizations, corporations, partnerships and associations, the
terms shall include each member, officer, partner, associate, agent or employee.
SOLICITOR. A person who goes from house -to- house, door -to -door, business -to- business,
street -to- street, or any other type of place -to- place, for the purpose of obtaining or attempting to
obtain orders for goods, wares, products, merchandise, other personal property or services of
which he or she may be carrying or transporting samples, or that may be described in a catalog or
P4
P5
by other means, and for which delivery or performance shall occur at a later time. The absence of
samples or catalogs shall not remove a person from the scope of this provision if the actual
purpose of the person's activity is to obtain or attempt to obtain orders as discussed above. The
term shall mean the same as the term canvasser.
TRANSIENT MERCHANT Any person whose business in the city is temporary or seasonal
and consists of selling and delivering merchandise within the city, and who in furtherance of the
purpose uses or occupies any structure, vehicle or other place for the exhibition and sale of the
merchandise.
(Prior Code, § 612.01) (Ord. 01 -89, passed 2 -13 -1989)
§ 613.02 EXCEPTIONS TO DEFINITIONS.
(1) For the purpose of this chapter, the terms peddler, solicitor and transient merchant shall
not apply to the following:
(a)
Persons doing business by appointment;
(b) Persons selling or attempting to sell at wholesale their goods, wares, products or
merchandise to retail, wholesale, professional or industrial establishments;
(c) Persons conducting the type of sales commonly known as garage sales, rummage
sales or estate sales, as well as anyone conducting an auction as a properly licensed auctioneer or
any officer of the court conducting a court- ordered sale;
(d) No licenses shall be required for vendors as a preliminary step to the establishment
of a regular route service for the sale and delivery of commodities or the providing of services to
regular customers; and
(e)
School aged children selling items for fund raisers.
(2) Exception from the definitions for the scope of this chapter shall not excuse any person
from complying with any other applicable statutory provision or local ordinance
(Prior Code, § 612.03) (Ord. 01 -89, passed 2 -13 -1989)
§ 613.03 RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS.
(1) Any organization, society, association or corporation desiring to solicit or have solicited
in its name money, donations of money or property or financial assistance of any kind or desiring
to sell or distribute any item of literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited
from persons other than members of the organizations upon the streets, in office or business
buildings, by house to house canvass or in public places for a charitable, religious, patriotic,
philanthropic or otherwise non -profit purpose shall be exempt from § 613.04 of this chapter,
•
•
•
•
•
provided a sworn application in writing on a form furnished by the city is filed which shall
include the following information:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Name and purpose of the cause for which the license is sought;
Names and addresses of the officers and/or directors of the organization;
The period during which the solicitation is to be carried on; and
(d) Whether or not any commission, fee, wages or emoluments are to be expended in
connection with the solicitation.
(2) Upon the foregoing being satisfied, the organization, association or corporation shall
furnish all its members, agents or representatives conducting the solicitation credentials in
writing stating the name of the organization, name of the agent and the purpose of the
solicitation. The credentials shall be kept on the person of the members, agents or representatives
during the actual solicitation and be presented to anyone requesting to see same.
(Prior Code, § 612.04) (Ord. 01 -89, passed 2 -13 -1989)
§ 613.04 LICENSING; EXENIPTIONS.
(1) County license required. No person shall conduct business as a peddler, solicitor or
transient merchant within the city limits without first having obtained the appropriate license
from the county as required by M.S. Ch. 329, as it may be amended from time to time, if the
county issues a license for the activity.
(2) City license required. Except as otherwise provided for by this chapter, no person shall
conduct business as either a peddler, solicitor or transient merchant without first having obtained
a license from the city. The license period will be no longer than six months from the date of
issuance. A single license may be issued to a company covering its employees or agents as long
as an application, as described herein, is completed, for each individual person operating in the
city.
(3) Application. Application for a city license to conduct business as a peddler, transient
merchant or solicitor shall be made at least ten regular business days before the applicant desires
to begin conducting business on an application form available from the office of the City Clerk.
All applications shall be signed by the applicant and shall include the following information:
(a) Applicant's full legal name, name of business and applicant's current position;
(b) All other names under which the applicant conducts business or to which applicant
officially answers;
(c) Applicant's permanent home and business address as well as a local address for
correspondence;
P6
P7
(d) Any and all business related telephone numbers, including a number where the
applicant can be reached while conducting business in the city;
(e) A brief written description of the nature of the business, the goods to be sold and the
applicant's method of operation;
(f) A brief statement of the nature, character and content of the advertising done or
proposed to be done in order to attract customers (samples may be requested);
(g) Full legal name of any and all business operations owned, managed or operated by
applicant, or for which the applicant is an employee or agent;
(h) The length of time which the applicant intends to do business in the city with the
approximate dates;
(i) A statement as to whether or not the applicant or the person managing the business
activities has been convicted within the last five years of any felony, Foss misdemeanor or
misdemeanor for violation of any state or federal statute or any Local ordinance, other than traffic
offenses;
(j) The applicant's driver's license number or other acceptable form of identification.
(k) If a vehicle is to be used, a description of the same together with license number or
other means of identification;
(1) A photograph of the applicant, taken within 60 days immediately prior to the date of
filing of the application, which picture shall be two inches by two inches showing the head and
shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinguishing manner;
(m) A list of the three most recent locations where the applicant has conducted business
as a peddler, solicitor or transient merchant; and
(n) Transient merchants shall include the addresses of all places where the business is to
be located along with written consent of the owners or occupants.
(Prior Code, § 612.06) (Ord.. 01 -89, passed 2 -13 -1989)
(4) Fee. All applications for a license under this chapter shall be accompanied by the fee
established by ordinance annually in the city fee schedule, as it may be amended from time to
time.
(5) Procedure. Upon receipt of the completed application and payment of the license fee,
the City Clerk must determine if the application is complete. An application is determined to be
complete only if all required information is provided. If the City Clerk determines that the
application is incomplete, the City Clerk must inform the applicant of the required or necessary
information that is missing. If the application is complete, the City Clerk must order any
•
investigation, including background checks, necessary to verify the information provided with
the application. The City Clerk will present the license request to the Council as soon as possible.
If there exists grounds for denying the license under § 613.05, the Clerk will present that
information to the City Council. If the Council denies the license, the applicant must be notified
in writing of the decision, the reason for denial and of the applicant's right to appeal the denial by
requesting, within 20 days of receiving notice of rejection, a public hearing before the City
Council. The City Council shall hear the appeal within 20 days of the date of the request.
(6) License exemptions.
(a) No license shall be required of any person going from house -to- house, door -to -door,
business -to- business, street -to -street or other type of place -to -place when the activity is for the
purpose of exercising that person's state or federal constitutional rights such as the freedom of
speech, press, religion and the like, except that this exemption may be lost if the person's
exercise of constitutional rights is merely incidental to a commercial activity.
(b) Professional fundraisers working on behalf of an otherwise exempt person or group
shall not be exempt from the licensing requirements of this chapter.
§ 613.05 LICENSE INELIGIBILITY.
The following shall be grounds for denying a license under this chapter:
(1) The failure of the applicant to truthfully provide any of the information requested by the
city as part of the application, or the failure to sign the application or the failure to pay the
required fee at the time of application;
(2) The conviction of the applicant within the past five years from the date of application
for any violation of any federal or state statute or regulation, or of any local ordinance, which
adversely reflects on the person's ability to conduct the business for which the license is being
sought in an honest and legal manner. Those violations shall include but not be limited to
burglary, theft, larceny, swindling, fraud, unlawful business practices and any form of actual or
threatened physical harm against another person;
(3) The revocation within the past five years of any license issued to the applicant for the
purpose of conducting business as a peddler, solicitor or transient merchant; and
(4) The applicant is found to have a bad business reputation. Evidence of a bad business
reputation shall include, but not be limited to, the existence of more than three complaints
against the applicant with the Better Business Bureau, the Attorney General's office or other
similar business or consumer rights office or agency, within the preceding 12 months.
§ 613.06 LICENSE SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION.
(1) Generally. Any license issued under this section may be suspended or revoked at the
discretion of the City Council for violation of any of the following:
P8
P9
(a) Fraud, misrepresentation or incorrect statements on the application form;
(b) Fraud, misrepresentation or false statements made during the course of the licensed
activity;
(c) Conviction of any offense for which granting of a license could have been denied
under § 613.05; and
(d) Violation of any provision of this chapter.
(2) Multiple persons under one license. The suspension or revocation of any license issued
for the purpose of authorizing multiple persons to conduct business as peddlers or transient
merchants on behalf of the licensee shall serve as a suspension or revocation of each authorized
person's authority to conduct business as a peddler or transient merchant on behalf of the licensee
whose license is suspended or revoked.
(3) Notice. Prior to revoking or suspending any license issued under this chapter, the city
shall provide the license holder with written notice of the alleged violations and inform the
licensee of his or her right to a hearing on the alleged violation. Notice shall be delivered in
person or by mail to the local address given on the application.
(4) Public hearing. Upon receiving the notice provided in division (3) of this section, the
licensee shall have the right to request a public hearing. If no request for a hearing is received by
the City Clerk within ten regular business days following the service of the notice, the city may
proceed with the suspension or revocation. For the purpose of mailed notices, service shall be
considered complete as of the date the notice is placed in the mail. If a public hearing is
requested within the stated time frame, a hearing shall be scheduled within 20 days from the date
of the request. Within three regular business days of the hearing, the City Council shall notify the
licensee of its decision.
(5) Emergency. If, in the discretion of the City Council, imminent harm to the health or
safety of the public may occur because of the actions of a peddler or transient merchant licensed
under this chapter, the City Council may immediately suspend the person's license and provide
notice of the right to hold a subsequent public hearing as prescribed in division (4) of this
section.
§ 613.07 LICENSE TRANSJ'ERABILITY.
No license issued under this chapter shall be transferred to any person other than the person to
whom the license was issued_
§ 613.08 FR01111311 ED ACTIVITIES.
(1) Sell or solicit before the hour of 9:00 a.m. or after one -half hour past sunset unless a
previous appointment has been made.
•
•
•
•
•
(2) Enter or conduct business upon any premise where a sign or plaque is conspicuously
posted stating in effect that no peddlers or solicitors are allowed. The signs shall have letters a
minimum of one -half inch high.
(3) Occupy for the purpose of advertising and /or conducting business any area within a
sight triangle, at any road intersection.
(4) Occupy as a transient merchant, solicitor or peddler, any public right -of -way or other
public property for the purpose of advertising and /or conducting business.
(5) Obstruct the free flow of either vehicular or pedestrian traffic on any street, alley,
sidewalk or other public right of way.
(6) Conduct business in a way as to create a threat to the health, safety and welfare of any
individual or the general public.
(7) Call attention to business or items to be sold by means of blowing any horn or whistle,
ringing any bell, crying out or by any other noise, so as to be unreasonably audible within an
enclosed structure.
(8)
Failing to provide proof of license and identification, when requested.
(9) Making false or misleading statements about the product or service being sold,
including untrue statements of endorsement. No peddler, solicitor or transient merchant shall
claim to have the endorsement of the city solely based on the city having issued a license or
registration to that person.
(10) Remaining on the property of another when requested to leave or to otherwise conduct
business in a manner a reasonable person would find obscene, threatening, intimidating or
abusive.
§ 613.09 PENALTIES.
Whoever does any act forbidden by this chapter or omits or fails to do any act required by this
chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to all penalties provided for under
Minnesota law.
P10
•
EXPENDITURES
FEBRUARY 27, 2012
CHECK NO. 92759 - 92870
$220,574.25
•
P11
DR 1 202/21/2012
Ranges:
Time: 11:00:24
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 10002 10027
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: S
City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 1
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: A Check Over Expend: N
•
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
D00080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 60.79 60.79 .00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 475.58 475.58 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 2 93.60 93.60 .00 .00
000320 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC. 1 789.06 789.06 .00 .00
000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 14.96 14.96 .00 .00
000904 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
004063 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 2 128.50 128.50 .00 .00
000420 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS & TAXATION 1 10,340.55 10,340.55 .00 .00
000421 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY DEPT 1 742.13 742.13 .00 .00
000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 6 1,131.91 1,131.91 .00 .00
000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 2 535.64 535.64 .00 •
000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 27.00 27.00 .00
000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 1 106.36 106.36 .00 .00
000620 BEACON ATHLETICS 1 338.40 338.40 .00 .00
000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00
008293 BIFF'S INC. 3 128.37 128.37 .00 .00
008237 BLAINE PARKS AND RECREATION 1 109.49 109.49 .00 .00
000720 CITY OF BLAINE 1 288.00 288.00 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 134.77 134.77 .00 .00
001265 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 2 5,880.67 5,880.67 .00 .00
000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 2 160.67 160.67 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 96.04 96.04 .00 .00
•
Date: 02/21/2012 Time: 11:00:25
•r #
Name
City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Pag€P 1 a
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 464.47 464.47 .00 .00
007764 CENTENNIAL SPORTS ARENA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
001110 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 1 4,536.92 4,536.92 .00 .00
002700 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 1,840.22 1,840.22 .00 .00
000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 2,304.00 2,304.00 .00 .00
004670 COMCAST 1 69.90 69.90 .00 .00
001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 .00 .00
001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 54.98 54.98 .00 .00
008560 DANIEL DELLWO 1 137.00 137.00 .00 .00
008561 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE COMPANY 1 28.95 28.95 .00 .00
007931 DUFFY, CORI M. 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
008562 E -S PRESS INC 1 334.00 334.00 .00 .00
008393 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES, INC. 1 10,956.45 10,956.45 .00 .00
008554 ENTERTAINMENT PLUS 1 142.50 142.50 .00 .0Q
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 2 233.39 233.39 .00 .00
111/167 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 4.79 4.79 .00 .00
(40 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 1 513.43 513.43 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 10.99 10.99 .00 .00
002328 G & K SERVICES, INC. 1 66.10 66.10 .00 .00
008557 GECK, DUEA & OLSON, PLLC 2 8,400.00 8,400.00 .00 .00
008558 GOLDSTAR PRINTWORKS 1 87.67 87.67 .00 .00
008240 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL 1 82.65 82.65 .00 .00
001720 GRAINGER 1 58.75 58.75 .00 .00
001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS 1 203.25 203.25 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS, INC. 2 7,416.48 7,416.48 .00 .00
001827 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1 875.00 875.00 .00 .00
002175 HOKANSON PLUMBING /HEATING, INC. 1 32.09 32.09 .00 .00
•
Dc 4 .02/21/2012
Time: 11:00:25
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: KKF Page: 3
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount
Di s.
001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 148.35 148.35 .00 .00
007224 HUGO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1 283.61 283.61 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 45.18 45.18 .00 .00
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 142.50 142.50 .00 .00
002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 480.00 480.00 .00 .00
008394 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INC. 2 3,624.13 3,624.13 .00 .00
001940 KEEPRS, INC. 2 416.75 416.75 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, INC. 1 1,121.92 1,121.92 .00 .00
000673 LANDFORM 1 2,809.60 2,809.60 .00 .00
002248 LARSON ALLEN, LLP / /1 - 8- 999r413 .00 .00
002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 14,320.00 14,320.00 .00 .00
008123 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 4,709.27 4,709.27 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 6 327.40 327.40 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 2 7,928.93 7,928.93 .00 .00
002550 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
007694 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1 57,077.74 57,077.74 .00
000349 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF 1 204.00 204.00 .00
001310 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 325.00 325.00 .00 .00
002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 2 1,058.55 1,058.55 .00 .00
002750 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
000649 MPSTMA 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00
003091 NCPERS MINNESOTA 1 352.00 352.00 .00 .00
003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 6,837.20 6,837.20 .00 .00
000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES, INC. 4 140.42 140.42 .00 .00
000983 OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES 2 74.06 74.06 .00 .00
008247 PARK BUS COMPANY 1 538.75 538.75 .00 .00
000217 POLAR CHEVROLET & MAZDA 1 204.50 204.50 .00 .00
•
Date: 02/21/2012 Time 11:00:26
City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Pag€P 1 5
Discount
r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000057 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. 1 61.58 61.58 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 5 419.83 419.83 .00 .00
007467 RAMSEY COUNTY VITAL RECORDS 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
000888 RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INC. 1 180.00 180.00 .00 .00
900491 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 2 7,095.46 7,095.46 .00 .00
003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 94.05 94.05 .00 .00
003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 299.24 299.24 .00 .00
000065 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. 1 102.33 102.33 .00 .00
003926 SCHWAAB, INC. 1 43.47 43.47 .00 .00
008559 MARGE SHAW 1 156.34 156.34 .00 .00
003882 SHRED -IT USA INC. 2 66.00 66.00 .00 .00
004000 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 1 23.46 23.46 .00 .00
004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 958.92 958.92 .00 .00
0008563 SPRAYER SPECIALTIES, INC. 1 1,982.67 1,982.67 .00 .00
008142 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 1 1,043.90 1,043.90 .00 .00
11111150 STAR TRIBUNE 1 244.40 244.40 .00 .00
4240 STREICHER'S, INC. 4 374.71 374.71 .00 .00
008141 TASC 1 189.10 189.10 .00 .00
000489 TDS METROCOM MN 1 988.87 988.87 .00 .00
004350 TKDA 4 22,331.90 22,331.90 .00 .00
004560 U S BANK VISA 1 8,072.98 8,072.98 .00 .00
004667 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA, INC. 1 24.62 24.62 .00 .00
004765 WARGO NATURE CENTER 1 139.49 139.49 .00 .00
004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 100.09 100.09 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 3,079.51 3,079.51 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 144 2,24751"4-r"8"5 -2277' .00 .00*
o C , , c �--
•
Dpc.1602/21/2012
Ranges:
Time: 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 10003 - 10027
Bank #: (A)
Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1
Page on Department: N
Department
Vendor Name Description
Amount
MAYOR /COUNCIL
MAYOR /COUNCIL
MAYOR /COUNCIL
MAYOR /COUNCIL
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
LEGAL CONSULTANTS
LEGAL CONSULTANTS
LEGAL CONSULTANTS
PLANNING & ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
CENTRAL PENSION FUND FEB. 2012 IUOE CONTRIBUT
INTL UNION OF OPER E FEB. 2012 UNION DUES
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY CHILD SUPPORT
NCPERS MINNESOTA 590600 - MARCH 2012 PERA
U S BANK VISA EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHA
Total for Department
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MEMBERSHIP DUES
NYSTROM PUBLISHING C NEWS /PARK & REC GUIDE, 4
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ORD 01 -12 PUBLICATION
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ORD 23 -11 PUBLICATION
Total for Department 401
BARNA, GUZY & STEFFE PROFESSIONAL FEES - DATA
OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIA JAN. 2012 ELIG PLAN PART
OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIA JAN. 2012 RETIREES
METROPOLITAN AREA HOME VALUATIONS /REAL EST
SHRED -IT USA INC. DESIGNATED CONFIDENTIAL
SAM'S CLUB, INC. JEAN VIGER MEMBERSHIP
U S BANK VISA MCFOA CONFERENCE
TASC JAN. 2012 FLEX PLAN ADMI
Total for Department 402
ANOKA COUNTY PROPERT
LARSON ALLEN, LLP
LARSON ALLEN, LLP
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
U S BANK VISA
TRUTH IN TAXATION
2011 AUDIT
JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
AL ROLEK MEMBERSHIP
KIM FREAD MEMBERSHIP
PAULA SCHLOER MEMBERSHIP
2012 GFOA CONFERENCE REG
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF FEB. 2012 IT SERVICE BIL
Total for Department 407
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, IN DEC. 2011 GENERAL FINANC
GECK, DUEA & OLSON, FORFEITURE PROF SVCS
GECK, DUEA & OLSON, PROSECUTION /CONTRACT
Total for Department 414
LANDFORM
2,304.00
480.00
1,058.55
352.00
1,980.67
6,175.22*
14,320.00
2,051.16
47.70
91.43
16,510.29*
27.00
51.06
23.00
20.00
18.00
35.00
510.00
189.10
873.16*
1,875.61
va►���, C (pro p
1,600.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
380.00
6,144.16
11,704.77*
63.00
400.00
8,000.00
8,463.00*
INDUSTRIAL ORDINANCE UPD 2,809.60
U S BANK VISA SENSIBLE LAND USE COALIT
200.00
•
•
•
Date: 02/21/2012 Time: 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
•
Department
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
ENGINEERING
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
ICE
ICE
11111!ICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
•
TKDA
Total for Department 416
Total for
MINNEAPOLIS,
TDS METROCOM
ASPEN MILLS,
ASPEN
ASPEN
ASPEN
ANOKA
CITY OF
MN
INC.
MILLS, INC.
MILLS, INC.
MILLS, INC.
COUNTY GOVERNM
CONNEXUS ENERGY
MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF
KEEPRS, INC.
KEEPRS, INC.
IMAGE PRINTING & GRA
METRO SALES INCORPOR
METRO SALES INCORPOR
SHRED -IT USA INC.
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
SCHWAAB, INC.
STREICHER'S, INC.
STREICHER'S, INC.
STREICHER'S, INC.
STREICHER'S, INC.
U S BANK VISA
U S
U S
U S
U S
BANK VISA
BANK VISA
BANK VISA
BANK VISA
GEN ENGINEERING SVCS
Department 417
APS ANNUAL 00 USER ACCES
MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE BI
BOEHME UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
HALVERSON UNIFORM ALLOWA
POLICE EXPLORERS UNIFORM
YOUNG UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
L. HAWKINSON NOTARY COMM
MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
FULL ETI REGISTRATION -
EXPLORERS UNIFORM
STREGE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RECEIPTS
PRORATED PERIOD OF UPGRA
RICOH MP 4001SP W /FAX OP
DESIGNATED CONFIDENTIAL
JACKIE BOWDICH MEMBERSHI
RECEIPT BOOKS FOR ACE
PRE -INKED STAMPS
HAGERT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
P. NOLL UNIFORM ALLOWANC
SCHIRMERS UNIFORM ALLOWA
WEGENER UNIFORM ALLOWANC
2012 IACP MEMBERSHIP REN
2012 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL -
2012 MOCIC MEMBERSHIP RE
CERT HOLIDAY DINNER
FINGERPRINT READERS - RM
RAMSEY COUNTY VITAL BOWDICH NOTARY COMMISSIO
DRIVERS LICENSE GUID 2012 I.D. CHECKING GUIDE
Total for Department 420
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE DEC. 2011 HARWARE /SEASON
U S BANK VISA BUILDING OFFICIAL CONTIN
U S BANK VISA ICC UPPER GRAT PLAINS TR
Total for Department 422
ANOKA COUNTY TREASUR
TDS METROCOM MN
SPRAYER SPECIALTIES,
RICK JOHNSON DEER &
CONNEXUS ENERGY
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C
MENARDS, INC.
MENARDS, INC.
MENARDS, INC.
4TH QTR 2011 SIGNAL MAIN
MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE BI
COMPONENTS FOR SALT APPL
REMOVAL OF DEER
MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
2012 OSHA COMPLIANCE MON
PARTS FOR SALT APPLICATI
RETURN -1/2" 4 X 8 B2 NAT
TOOLS FOR PD WOODWORKING
3,009.60*
353.95
353.95*
204.00
673.95
111.75
276.77
286.64
456.75
20.00
21.37
325.00
260.78
155.97
45.18
202.00
7,726.93
48.00
35.00
19.24
43.47
97.48
39.99
44.88
192.36
120.00
75.00
150.00
279.96
332.78
20.00
28.95
12,294.20*
148.35
120.00
280.00
548.35*
742.13
38.17
1,982.67
180.00
1,305.00
218.75
60.46
-37.48
34.19
P17
D D 02/21/2012 Time: 10:48:55
Department
Operator: KKF
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT
MENARDS, INC.
MN DEPT OF AGRICULTU
XCEL ENERGY
TKDA
U S BANK VISA
GOLDSTAR PRINTWORKS
GOLDSTAR PRINTWORKS
Total for
SCHARBER & SONS, INC
AMERICAN FASTENER &
POLAR CHEVROLET & MA
AUTO- MEDICS, INC.
AUTO - MEDICS, INC.
BAUER BUILT, INC.
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
BEE LINE ALIGNMENT S
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE
HARMON AUTOGLASS
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
TOOLS FOR WOODWORKING
PESTICIDE LICENSES
JAN. 2012 ELECT CHARGES
OTTER LAKE SVC RD CULVER
11TH ANNUAL ROAD SALT SY
BOLDT CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
PAYNE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
Department 430
COOLANT HE /POWER CORD -
CABLE TIES /NUTS /BOLTS /CA
BODY REPAIR - # 362
TOW '93 FORD L8000 TO BO
TOW '98 STERLING TO CITY
TRANSFORCE AT BW
FILTER ASSEMBLY - STOCK
REPLACE LAMP, THERMOSTAT
WHEEL ALIGNMENT - # 402
SMALL TOOLS
SNOW BLOWER BELT
STOCK ITEMS
WINDSHIELD - UNIT # 231
LOW BEAM BULBS - STOCK
HEATER REPAIR /FUEL GAUGE
NOT STARTING /REPAIR & LA
FAST BREAK CORNER MA CAR WASHES
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C 2012 OSHA COMPLIANCE MON
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY - # 362
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS RETURN OIL COOLER LINE
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORA HEAVY WEIGHT OIL ONLY MA
ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE TABS /UNITS 225, 322, 320
U S BANK VISA OTC 3908 AMP CLAMP
VERMEER OF MINNESOTA VEMEER CHIPPER FILTER #
WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. SQUARE TUBE DRIP /RAZOR C
LUBRICATION TECHNOLO 1000.0 GALLONS 87 UNLEAD
LUBRICATION TECHNOLO 500.0 GALLONS ULS RED 85
Total for Department 431
BUILDINGS PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
BUILDINGS ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER
BUILDINGS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC
BUILDINGS ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
BUILDINGS TDS METROCOM MN
BUILDINGS C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT
BUILDINGS CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
BUILDINGS CONNEXUS ENERGY
BUILDINGS FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA
BUILDINGS GRAINGER
BUILDINGS G & K SERVICES, INC.
BUILDINGS MENARDS, INC.
BOTTLED WATER - PUBLIC W
SWIVEL ASSY
RUBBISH REMOVAL
BOISE X -9 COPY PAPER /BLU
MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE BI
OFFICE SUPPLIES
JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -CITY
MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
JOINT CMPD /3" WALL SCRAP
ICEMAKER FILTER
SHOP SUPPLIES
MATERIAL FOR MAIL SLOTS
128.46
20.00
228.28
283.16
125.00
5.34
21.38
5,335.51*
102.33
64.28
204.50
267.82
267.82
106.36
72.57
88.10
75.00
10.66
5.95
123.81
203.25
54.98
598.78
5,281.89
4.79
218.75
264.07
-30.68
94.05
88.50
104.25
24.62
100.09
3,068.31
1,640.96
13,105.81*
61.58
60.79
475.58
789.06
162.26
96.04
4,103.07
1,085.10
10.99
58.75
66.10
42.84
•
•
Date: 02/21/2012 Time 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
•
Department
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
S
4111tS
PARKS
PARKS
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRAM REC
PROGRAM REC
•
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS
CENTERPOINT / MINNEGAS
XCEL ENERGY
SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO
SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO
STAR TRIBUNE
COMCAST
STAPLES ADVANTAGE
JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -1187
JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -1189
JAN. 2012 ELECT CHARGES
AMANO PIX RIBBON
2012 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
ANNUAL MAINT. CONTRACT -
PUBLIC WORKS SUBSCRIPTIO
MONTHLY INTERNET CHARGES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
JANI -KING OF MINNESO FEB. 2012 CONTRACT CLEAN
JANI -KING OF MINNESO FEB. 2012 CONTRACT CLEAN
ROSEVILLE, CITY OF FEB. 2012 MONTHLY PHONE
Total for Department 432
BEACON ATHLETICS BEACON FIELD MARKING SYS
MPSTMA HOFFMAN & GILBERTSON 201
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6811
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6918
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -7204
CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, TELESCOPIC LOPPER /7" FOL
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C 2012 OSHA COMPLIANCE MON
P6000 DIAPHRAM KIT FOR U
SUNRISE SOUTH RINK REPAI
JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -1179
JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6520
COURSE
HOKANSON PLUMBING /HE
MENARDS, INC.
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS
U S BANK VISA ANNUAL SHADE TREE
HUGO EQUIPMENT COMPA MAINT. SUPPLIES
BIFF'S INC. RUBBISH REMOVAL - BIRCH
BIFF'S INC. RUBBISH REMOVAL - CITY H
BIFF'S INC. RUBBISH REMOVAL - SUNRIS
GOLDSTAR PRINTWORKS GILBERTSON CLOTHING ALLO
Total for Department 450
NYSTROM PUBLISHING C NEWS /PARK & REC GUIDE, 4
SAM'S CLUB, INC. BRIAN HRONSKI MEMBERSHIP
SAM'S CLUB, INC. TANYA MOZINGO MEMBERSHIP
U S BANK VISA PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Total for Department 451
ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. CITY WELLHEAD MAP /FOAM C
MN DEPT OF AGRICULTU PESTICIDE LICENSES
U S BANK VISA ANNUAL SHADE TREE COURSE
U S BANK VISA ARBORIST WORKSHOP
Total for Department 461
Total for Fund 101
LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT
LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
517.61
672.26
2,477.61
23.46
368.00
391.92
244.40
69.90
1,043.90
3,137.85
486.28
951.30
17,396.65*
338.40
75.00
19.36
230.09
165.04
69.46
513.43
218.75
32.09
98.93
99.54
79.36
350.00
283.61
42.79
42.79
42.79
60.95
2,762.38*
4,786.04
35.00
35.00
60.00
4,916.04*
14.96
15.00
350.00
95.00
474.96*
103,923.89*
40.00 1%D iP F ([00 r`ti
40.00 J
P19
DO02/21/2012 Time 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
Total for Department 200 80.00*
OTHER DUFFY, CORI M. REFUND OF ROOM DEPOSIT 50.00
Total for Department 204 50.00*
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS BLAINE, CITY OF AFTON ALPS SKI TRIP - 11 288.00
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA PLAZA CLEANERS /SANTA SUI 20.54
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA PRINCESS PARTY SUPPLIES 195.47
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SENIOR BOOK CLUB 247.01
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SENIOR TRIP - "1968" 560.00
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SENIOR TRIP TICKETS 52.00
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SESAME STREET LIVE 120.00
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SESAME STREET LIVE TICKE 30.00
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SNOW DAY EVENT SUPPLIES 61.54
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SUPER HERO EVENT SUPPLIE 26.66
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SWEETHEART EVENT SUPPLIE 145.67
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS WARGO NATURE CENTER SNOW DAY EVENT 139.49
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS BLAINE PARKS AND REC SNOW DAY 2012 109.49
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS PARK BUS COMPANY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 538.75
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS ENTERTAINMENT PLUS DJ FOR PRINCESS PARTY 142.50
Total for Department 205 2,677.12*
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL PRESS PUBLICATIONS, HOCKEY /SOCCER CLASSES PU 74.00
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL CENTENNIAL SPORTS AR PRESIDENTS DAY OPEN SKAT 100.00
Total for Department 207 174.00*
Total for Fund 201 2,981.12*
OTHER ANOKA COUNTY PROPERT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
Total for Department 499
Total for Fund 301
6,944.61 VO CVA+ `o 9 y A,r"
160.00 ( J
7,264.61*
CENTENNIAL FIRE DIST NORTH MEMORIAL OPER COST 464.47
Total for Department 464.47* t// �`
X' 3 u — ✓ V `� a) rO �� tg
OTHER LARSON ALL EN, LLP 2011 AUDIT
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
Total for Department 499
240.00
Total for Fund 401 944.47*
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS U S BANK VISA SOFTWARE UPGRADE REMAIND
Total for Department 432
OTHER
Total for Fund 403
20.36
20.36*
20.36*
LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT 410.00
•
•
•
Date: 02/21/2012 Time: 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
•
Page: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS 440.00
OTHER PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IMPROVEMENT OF OTTER LAK 95.40
OTHER PRESS PUBLICATIONS, RESOLUTION 12 -05 PUBLICA 111.30
Total for Department 499 3-- 616VQ*^-. (P�j� iii
Total for Fund 406 1,086.70* V,
OTHER
ANOKA COUNTY PROPERT TIF - M6 456.64
Total for Department 499 456.64*
Total for Fund 411
456.64*
OTHER ANOKA COUNTY PROPERT TIF - T5 491.35
OTHER KENNEDY & GRAVEN, IN DEC. 2011 SCWANNS DEV (T 42.00
Total for Department 499 533.35*
Total for Fund 417 533.35*
OTHER ANOKA COUNTY PROPERT TIF - T8 572.34
OTHER KENNEDY & GRAVEN, IN DEC. 2011 LEGACY AT WOOD 420.00
Total for Department 499 992.34*
P21
Total for Fund 418 992.34* '' �(��
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT U 13 l l' (9 ro r\ /" /� ytzar)
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS 40.00 �/
OTHER EMMONS & OLIVIER RES JAN. 2012 GIS DEVELOPMEN 2,221.00
111/ER EMMONS & OLIVIER RES JAN. 2012 PLAN & PUBLIC 2,030.70
R EMMONS & OLIVIER RES JAN. 2012 SURFACE WATER 339.25
R EMMONS & OLIVIER RES JAN. 2012 SURFACE WATER 6,365.50
Total for Department 499 1_ _p _� , 5.- i O r
OTHER
Total for Fund 422
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, IN DEC. 2011 I35 & MAIN STR 596.92
Total for Department 499 596.92*
Total for Fund 474 596.92*
OTHER TKDA BIRCH ST /WARE RD INTERSE 11,797.83
OTHER TKDA LRIP GRANT SUBMITTAL 1,415.80
OTHER TKDA MAIN ST /LAKE DR INTERSEC 8,481.16
Total for Department 499 21,694.79*
WATER
•
Total for Fund 475 21,694.79*
SHAW, MARGE REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT
156.34
Total for Department 156.34*
AMERICAN FASTENER & PIPE TAP /HEX HEAD PLUG 29.32
DRc2:202/21/2012 Time: 10:48:55 Operator: KKF
Department
Page: 7
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name Description
Amount
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
INSTRUMENTAL RESEARC TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA
TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE SERVICE BI
CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
HAWKINS, INC. CHLORINE CYLINDERS
HAWKINS, INC. LPC -5, HYDRO ACID, CHLOR
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL C 2012 OSHA COMPLIANCE MON
LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT
LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -1180
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6774
CENTERPOINT / MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6786
XCEL ENERGY JAN. 2012 ELECT CHARGES
SAM'S CLUB, INC. TIM BUDIG MEMBERSHIP
SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO 2012 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
GOPHER STATE ONE -CAL JAN. 2012 LOCATES
Total for Department 494
Total for Fund 601
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -SUNR
CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY ELEC. CHARGES
LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2011 AUDIT
LARSON ALLEN, LLP JAN. 2012 PROF SVCS
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -2200
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6300
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS JAN. 2012 GAS USAGE -6666
SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO 2012 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MARCH 2012 WASTEWATER SE
GOPHER STATE ONE -CAL JAN. 2012 LOCATES
Total for Department 495
Total for Fund 602
BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN
ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE
ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE
U S BANK VISA
DELLWO, DANIEL
E -S PRESS INC
Total
TOW 2000 FORD TAURUS /CN
FORFEITURE VEHICLES - CN
FORFEITURE VEHICLES - CN
SHIPPING COST OF RIFLER
RETURN OF SEIZED MONIES
BOOKS - EMOTIONAL SURVIVAL
for Department
Total for Fund 801
Grand Total
142.50
114.49
1,588.30
60.00
7,356.48
218.75
O4U. UU
520.00
123.48
135.99
164.86
373.62
35.00
99.50
41.33
3.*— (l ,003•o-
11,679.96*
19.36
430.77 (W
960.00
15.50
14.81
16.81
99.50
57,077.74
41.32
—6P 100116,
59,635.81*
134.77
20.00
20.00
1,081.07
137.00
334.00
1,726.84*
1,726.84*
224,574.25*
< 000,00‘)
d,g,D 514.115
i.�
Lit
•
•
•
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
•
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
Check Register - FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 2/8/2012 - 2/17/2012 Feb 17, 2012 02:49PM
GL Check Check Vendor
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee
•
•
02/12 02/17/2012 5207
02/12 02/17/2012 5208
02/12 02/17/2012 5209
02/12 02/17/2012 5210
02/12 02/17/2012 5211
02/12 02/17/2012 5212
02/12 02/17/2012 5213
02/12 02/17/2012 5214
02/12 02/17/2012 5215
02/12 02/17/2012 5216
02/12 02/17/2012 5217
02/12 02/17/2012 5218
02/12 02/17/2012 5219
02/12 02/17/2012 5220
02/12 02/17/2012 5221
02/12 02/17/2012 5222
02/12 02/17/2012 5223
02/12 02/17/2012 5224
02/12 02/17/2012 5225
Grand Totals:
Description
Check
Amount
11565
20353
30100
30480
31008
31137
50120
50140
60050
60140
70578
110300
140075
150140
160050
160493
180600
220200
240100
ASPEN MILLS, INC
BLAINE BROTHERS, INC
TARA CAMPEAU
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
COMCAST
CONNEXUS ENERGY
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAI
EMERGENCY SUPPORT SERVI
FISDAP
MINDY FIESTER
GRAINGER
KIRVIDA FIRE, INC
NO SUBURBAN REGIONAL MUT
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
PAETEC
PREMIUM WATERS, INC
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
VERIZON WIRELESS
XCEL ENERGY
UNIFORMS
WINDSHIELD FLUID
NREMT REIMB
JAN STATION 1 UTILITIES
INTERNET STATION 1
ELECTRIC STATION 1
NEW GENERATOR
HELMETS /HEAD LAMPS
TRAINING TEST FEE
EMT EXAM REIMB
TOGGLE SWITCH /SUPPLIES
2000 FREIGHLINER LADDER
MEMBERSHIP DUES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PHONES STATION 2
BOTTLED WATER
FEB PHONE SERVICE
CELL PHONES
ELECTRIC STATION 2
2,945.65
21.10
70.00
642.09
94.00
440.69
7,675.38
1,114.29
20.00
70,00
65.12
RE 82.00
300.00
169.76
148.74
35.08
839.16
237.75
407.71
15,378.52
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
P23
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
February 6, 2012 P 2 4
: February 6, 2012
. 5:35 p.m.
. 9:50p.m.
: Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell,
Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert
(arrived at 7:35 p.m.)
: None
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Public Safety John
Swenson; City Engineer Jason Wedel; Finance Director Al Rolek; Community
Development Director Michael Grochala; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner, City
Planner Paul Bengtson; Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson; City Clerk Julie
Bartell
1. Advisory Board Candidate Interviews — The council interviewed the following
applicants for city advisory boards. Interviews for other applicants had been held on
January 30.
- Julie Jeffrey- Schwartz, Economic Development Advisory Committee;
- Theresa Kalmen, Environmental Board
- Lou Masonick, Planning and Zoning Board
2. Signal Project Update — Community Development Director Grochala introduced
Anoka County Engineers Curt Kobilarcsik and Andy Witter, present to assist him in
updating the council on the Lake/Main and Birch/Ware signal improvement projects. He
noted that the engineering firm TKDA has finished the plans and specifications for the
both projects (drawing and photos of the project areas were on display). Both projects
were reviewed with Mr. Grochala noting the area where right of way acquisitions will be
necessary, a process that will be handled by Anoka County. He noted the public open
house that is scheduled on the projects. The expectation is an August construction start
and there should be little impact on area homes since the utilities are not impacted. The
two projects will be bid out as one and therefore the contractor will decide the schedule
(i.e. if they are constructed concurrently). When a council member asked staff if there will
be a reward /penalty program attached to the contract schedule, the county engineers
replied that they would anticipate only a penalty for late work; the size of the project
wouldn't merit a bonus for early work. Relative to any possible area business impacts,
the county has a TMO already in place to assist with that element. A council member
confirmed that no speed change is anticipated with the project. A council member asked
that staff utilize any watershed assistance that maybe available. Mr. Grochala noted that
the council will be asked to consider approving a joint powers agreement on the projects
in the near future.
1
P 2 5 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 6, 2012
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65 The council offered thanks to the group and congratulations on the huge and important
66 success they are seeing on the island. It is important and much appreciated work. A gift
67 was presented to Mr. LeBlanc by Ms. Bor on behalf of the Environmental Board. The
68 Board will be working to update their plans on the rookery this year.
69
70 4. Otter Lake Road Extension — Community Development Director Grochala noted that
71 the subject of the Otter Lake Road Improvement Project is on the next regular council
72 agenda for the purpose of the council conducting a public hearing. Since the project is
73 within a Charter exempt zone, it will follow Chapter 429 proceedings relative to
74 assessment of costs. After the hearing the council has options: take no action, request
75 additional information; or authorize preparation of plans and specifications. Since
76 assessments are involved, property owners have been notified. There is a time in the
77 process when a commitment is made so that the project moves forward. He noted that the
78 project is proposed to be funded by special assessment to benefited properties and there is
79 no back up funding so if those special assessments don't hold up for some reason and the
80 project is committed, the costs become a general obligation of the city. With that
81 consideration, Mr. Grochala noted the following possibilities: 1) in the short term, the
82 city could work with an appraiser to tighten up what are now just estimates on the costs
83 involved; 2) do a special benefit analysis with an appraiser for a more security in the
84 assessments; 3) wait for the appeal period on assessments to pass before committing to
85 the project. Staff is ready with an appraiser for direction from the council. A council
86 member asked if the appraisal costs would normally be incurred anyway with this project
87 and Mr. Grochala said mostly but not necessarily the benefit analysis. One council
88 member noted that covering the bases seems like a good idea in this case, especially with
89 one landowner not in favor of the assessments.
90
3. Blue Heron Rookery Update — Environmental Coordinator Asleson introduced
Environmental Board member Barbara Bor and volunteer Wayne LeBlanc. Mr. Asleson
reported that the heron nests are up on Peltier Island and they have counted approximately
57 nests. There is a workshop scheduled for February to prepare for the volunteer work
such as installing additional flashing to protect from the raccoons. He noted that National
Geographic has been to the area and worked on a production about the herons called
Mysteries of the Wild to be released soon.
Mr. LeBlanc introduced himself as a volunteer citizen who works with the heron project.
He offered thanks to the Environmental Board and Anoka County Parks for their
important support. While there used to be some 1,000 nests on the island and that
decreased to 47 at one point, he is estimating that in a secondary survey it now appears
even higher (up to about 125 nests) and it is coming on strong. Mr. Asleson added
thanks to Eagle Brook Church who provides sticks that the nesting birds have accepted
for their nesting materials. Mr. LeBlanc noted the important work of the group that goes
to the island; with new nests in trees now they will probably focus their work on flashing
for those new sites.
2
•
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
February 6, 2012 P 2 6
91 Mr. Thomas Rooney told the council that he works for the family that owns three of the
92 quadrants involved in this project. They see that there are different needs on each of
93 those quadrants. He reminded the council that they are already making a big investment
94 on 21St Avenue. There is concern that the cost of this project is much higher to the family
95 he represents and he pointed out that Otter Lake Road will ultimately be a regional
96 roadway that will have benefits to others down the line. He is concerned that the 440 feet
97 of roadway proposed doesn't increase values to the point they are being charged. Also
98 they feel that it is a premature improvement for one quadrant. A council member noted
99 that there is a land purchase involved that will have a monetary impact.
100
101 5. Residential Zoning District — City Planner Bengtson reported that staff is in the
102 process of updating the city's zoning ordinances to reflect the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
103 and is now presenting the Residential Zoning section to the council for review. The
104 changes have been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board with some changes added
105 by that group. The nine major changes to this section were noted and read by Mr.
106 Bengtson. He added that there are other minor changes throughout the ordinance that are
107 indicated by strikeout or underline. A council member noted Section 6 -2 and asked if the
108 requirement for a double garage means attached or not and Mr. Bengtson explained that
109 there is not a requirement for an attached garage and that is the standard throughout the
110 ordinance. He added an explanation of how the footprint of homes is reviewed and how
111 that process has been standardized in the ordinance. A council member asked how the
112 fire extinguisher requirement is enforced in the manufactured home element and staff
113 responded that it would normally be covered under the rental housing licensing process.
114 A council member asked for an example of a state licensed residential care facility; staff
115 explained that state law requires the use be allowed in all residential districts and the
116 actual definition from state law is included in the definitions section of this ordinance. A
117 council member noted Section 6 -4 and the word "racing" with staff explaining that the
118 section is being updated based on a recent situation with a racing course in a residential
119 area. A member asked about Section 6 -5 and the reference to "personal wireless service ",
120 with staff explaining that meant simply cell phone and added that all permitted uses are
121 specifically defined as far as towers and attennas. Section 6 -19 was mentioned and that it
122 doesn't allow a garage to exceed 32 feet; staff explained that that language is being added
123 specifically for smaller lots.
124
125 A council member asked if there will be standards this year for community garden use in
126 the city? Mr. Grochala explained that there is intent to increase requirements on such
127 things as fencing.
128
129 The council asked when the residential zoning ordinance was last updated and Mr.
130 Bengtson explained that this ordinance was adopted in 2003 and it has been intermittently
131 updated on an as needed basis since then.
132
133 The next zoning section to be updated and brought to the council will probably be the
134 industrial section.
135
P 27 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 6, 2012
136 One council member expressed continuing concern about an 80 foot lot allowance with a
137 minimal set back. As development occurs, these smaller lots distract from what the
138 process is and should be; everyone will push this to the max. That isn't meant to take
139 away from the hard work that staff has put into this update however. Mr. Grochala
140 noted that staff tries to keep separation through lot planning such as garage to garage; the
141 city is pretty consistent with other communities at this point. Landscaping will be an
142 area that staff intends to bring forward and that can impact the setback concern.
143
144 The council will see this ordinance at the next regular council meeting for first reading.
145
146 6. Review Landscaping Plan for Civil Complex - Public Services Director DeGardner
147 recalled that the council directed staff to look at a more formal landscaping plan for the
148 area in the front of the civil complex. He is presenting a plan prepared by a professional
149 landscaping consultant that includes vibrant plants that do not require annual replanting.
150 The cost of the installation and materials is estimated up to $27,000 but he would propose
151 that public works staff could accomplish the planting work leaving just the materials cost
152 to the city of $6,000. He will proceed with those plans with the council's direction to do
153 so. He added that the island in front of city hall has also been a topic of discussion for
154 possible landscaping. The Environmental Board has reviewed the idea and provided
155 comments in the staff report. Mr. DeGardner noted that he has provided two concepts for
156 the island also however the cost of that landscaping is not included in the proposal of
157 $6,000. He reminded the council that there are some oak trees on the island that could be
158 impacted by replanting.
159
160 Council suggestions and comments as follows:
161 Do not use red mulch;
162 Include local businesses when going for bid on materials;
163 Could the island just be paved for parking to better serve the public ?;
164 The current situation doesn't work and more formal would be more appropriate
165 for a civil complex.
166 Could the staff do the planting work on the island as well, with Mr. DeGardner
167 responding that it would depend on the timing if staff were available;
168
169 The council concurred that they would like a new look for the island and suggested that
170 the Environmental Board be asked to join in the planning process.
171
172 Mr. DeGardner will proceed with the plans for the front areas other than the island
173 (getting bids) and will come back with plans for the island.
174
175 7. Application for Senior Special Assessment Deferral- Community Development
176 Director Grochala explained that the city has received a request for an assessment deferral
177 based on senior citizen status for a homestead property located at 6910 Otter Lake Road.
178 The property is actually a business that includes a home that is reported by the applicant
179 to be homesteaded and rented to a relative. The property appears to qualify under state
180 law for the deferral, however, city code does have additional requirements. The Code
4
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 6, 2012 P 2 8
181 requires that the applicant fall under an income cap (the city has not received that
182 information from the applicant) and an asset and property value cap and that is not met by
183 the applicant. Staff noted that the code language, including the amount of the caps, dates
184 back to 1990. The city attorney has reviewed the situation and while he finds the city
185 language to be quite restrictive, he notes that state law does allow the city to decide.
186
187 The council concurred that they will require all the facts in the matter and will consider
188 the deferral when that information is received. Also the city ordinance should be
189 reviewed and updated if necessary.
190
191 8. Lake Drive Speed Study — Community Development Director Grochala noted that
192 the city has received a request to consider speed limit modifications on Lake Drive.
193 Specifically noted with this request is the increase in activity along the Drive including
194 bicycles and pedestrians. Speed limits are set by the state Commissioner of
195 Transportation with the county being the road authority for Lake Drive. The road lacks
196 continuity in its speed limits, something that the county prefers. He also noted that a
197 speed study could result in the speed limit being raised, however with a portion of the
198 roadway at 55 mph already that is somewhat unlikely. The cost of a study would be
199 covered by the state. Staff is asking council direction on proceeding with a request to
200 Anoka County for a speed study on Lake Drive. The city council concurred with that
201 direction.
202
203 9. Fundraising for Canine Program — Police Chief Swenson noted that the city's
204 canine program was begun in 2002 and it began with a donation. The current canine,
205 Recon, is nearing retirement age and his handler was promoted to a sergeant position 18
206 months ago. Chief Swenson suggested that the current status lends itself to looking at the
207 program and how it will be budgeted. There is much interest in keeping the canine
208 program. The cost of another dog is about $40,000 and funds have been raised in the
209 amount of about $6,000 already. The local Rotary Club is participating in raising funds
210 and there is an overall plan to bring the new program to fruition this year. At this point,
211 the chief noted, he wanted the council to know about the efforts in this area. A council
212 member asked Chief Swenson to talk about the benefits of a canine program and he
213 explained that the current team has been a great representative at trials, etc, have done
214 many community demonstrations, have aided in searches at the request of area schools,
215 assisted neighboring police departments (131 times), worked on traffic stops and searches
216 for this department and is good to have in event of tracking a missing person. Chief
217 Swenson added that he particularly sees the benefit in the community engagement.
218
219 The mayor noted that a canine program isn't a necessity for the department but he sees it
220 as an asset and a benefit to the community. The council accepted the Chief's report.
221
222 10. Five -Year Financial Plan — Finance Director Rolek reviewed his report that outlines
223 an updated Five —Year Plan draft. He noted that the updated Plan assumes new
224 projections in the areas of tax base, development and permit revenue and health insurance
225 rates. Staff is now looking for council direction.
5
P 2 9 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 6, 2012
226
227 The mayor noted that there are certain amendments to the Charter that have been
228 submitted and require further review. That impacts the city's budget and so it causes a
229 kind of pause at this point. Staff may have to apply the impact of an amendment to the
230 Plan.
231
232 Mr. Rolek noted that Page 2 of the Plan is his interpretation of the proposed tax cap, and
233 indicates a levy limit impact.
234
235 A council member requested that he receive the previous ten years of General Fund levy
236 amounts for review. Mr. Rolek will provide that information.
237
238 11. City Logo Policy- Administrator Karlson explained that there has been recent
239 discussion about the use the City's logo on business cards, clothing and patches. There
240 is a city policy in place regarding the logo and it is attached to his staff report. While the
241 Police Department has recently changed the logo on their uniform (patch) and the Public
242 Services Deaprtment is looking at requiring public works staff to wear a logo shirt, and a
243 request is in place to change city business cards, the policy isn't necessarily clear on these
244 requests. Mr. Karlson would like council direction in the area of changing some logo use
245 to a four color design and use of a color other than the standard green and creme called
246 for in the policy.
247
248 The mayor suggested putting a meeting schedule of the council on the back of the
249 business cards. On the question of deviating from the current city logo policy, the council
250 concurred that they don't see a problem with use of other colors. They would not like a
251 change in the graphic and would prefer to keep things standardized with deviation
252 accepted in colors. They suggested that staff bring back actual designs for further review.
253
254 12. Charter Task Force - Administrator Karlson noted that the council has been
255 provided with the Charter Commission's response to the council's request to participate
256 in a task force. That response is that they will only consider reviewing a change if it
257 follows the statutory process and involves the entire commission. The mayor noted that
258 abundant information is already in place on the topic of Chapter 8; the primary reason for
259 a task force was to bring in the Commission to participate but they've declined. Since
260 there is a tight schedule to get something on the ballot this fall and that includes
261 mandatory charter commission review, he recommends that the council proceed with
262 their process to put together the language for an amendment. Administrator Karlson
263 noted the final date in August for submitting language to the county for the ballot and
264 how the 60 plus 90 day review period for the commission fits into the schedule. It was
265 noted that the ordinance being discussed has already been submitted to the charter
266 commission and staff was directed to get a legal opinion on the need to resubmit. In the
267 meantime, the council will hold a special meeting to discuss an amendment (a meeting
268 was set to follow the regular council meeting on February 13); they would like to get a
269 review of the citizen task force recommended amendment, some options for water and
270 sewer improvements in road projects, and information on why the city needs to make this
6
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
February 6, 2012
271 change and what lies ahead if the process isn't changed. The council expressed support
272 for having a charter commission and for having a home rule charter city but concern
273 about the charter commission leadership. The council is left with a situation where they
274 must move forward.
275
276 13. Weekly Progress Report — Administrator Karison reviewed the report and updated
277 the council on individual items.
278
279 A council member requested that the Administrator include information on union
280 negotiations; a grid that indicates where each contract is in the process. The mayor
281 suggested that the council consider a policy that the labor contracts, including salary
282 increases, do not commence until the contract is completely resolved without
283 retroactivity. The city administrator expressed doubt that such a policy would be possible
284 but he will respond specifically on the question.
285
286 14. Regular Council Agenda — The agenda was reviewed with no changes.
287
288 The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
289
290 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
291 February 27, 2012.
292
293
294
295
296 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor
297
7
P30
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
1
2
3
4
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
February 13, 2012 P 31
5 DATE : February 13, 2012
6 TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m.
7 TIME ENDED : 7:35 p.m.
8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell, Rafferty,
9 Roeser, and Mayor Reinert
10 MEMBERS ABSENT : none
11
12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael
13 Grochala; Chief of Police John Swenson; City Engineer Jason Wedel; City Planner Paul Bengtson;
14 and City Clerk Julie Bartell
15
16 PUBLIC COMMENT
17
18 Kevin Ryan, 23110 West Martin, Linwood, noted his concern about being asked to get a city peLLnit
19 to go door to door in the city. He believes that he is exempted under state law and also because he is
20 running for an elective office. The council directed staff to provide an update on the city's peddler
21 regulations at the next work session.
22
23 SETTING THE AGENDA
24
25 The agenda was amended to include an announcement of the Lino Lakes Community Emergency
26 Response Team (CERT) Blood Drive on Saturday, February 18, 2012, at Lino Lakes City Hall.
27
28 Officer Chad Schirmers was recognized by the Council for being named the Lino Lakes Police
29 Department Officer of the Year.
30
31 CONSENT AGENDA
32
33 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items lA through 1I. Council
34 Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
35
36 ITEM ACTION
37
38 Consideration of Expenditures:
39
40 February 13, 2012 (Check No. 92637 -
41 92758, $208,040.04) Approved
42
43 Centennial Fire District (Check No. 5171-
44 6201, $45,328.84) Approved
45
P32
COUNCIL MINUTES February 13, 2012
DRAFT
46 January 23, 2012 Council Work Session
47 Minutes Approved
48
49 January 23, 2012 City Council Meeting
50 Minutes Approved
51
52 Application for Exempt Permit from Lawful
53 Gambling License (Raffle) for Chain of Lakes Rotary Approved
54
55 Resolution No. 12 -10, Application for Exempt
56 Charitable Gambling and Temporary On -Sale Liquor
57 License for Lino Lakes Lions Club Approved
58
59 January 30, 2012 Special Session Minutes Approved
60
61 Resolution No. 12 -12, Authorizing Issuance of 2012
62 Certificates of Indebtedness Approved
63
64 Resolution No. 12 -17, Authorizing Special Event
65 Permit for Snow Golf Event, Trappers Bar & Grill Approved
66
67 Resolution No. 12 -18, Approving Temporary On -Sale
68 Liquor License for Chain of Lakes Rotary Club Approved
69
70 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK
71
72 There was no report from the Finance Department.
73
74 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
75
76 3A. Advisory Board Appointments — Administrator Karlson reviewed the results of the advisory
77 board appointment process. The mayor recognized the quality of all the candidates that applied and
78 offered thanks to all; he encourages those who were not selected for appointment to apply again in the
79 future.
80
81 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the appointments as presented. Council Member Stoesz
82 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
83
84 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, JOHN SWENSON
85
86 There was no report from the Public Safety Department.
87
88 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
89
90 There was no report from the Public Services Department.
2
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
February 13, 2012 p 3 3
e 91
92 COMMUNTITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA
93
94 6A. Public Hearing, Otter Lake Road Extension Improvement Project — Community
95 Development Director Grochala explained that the purpose of the hearing this evening is for the city
96 to receive public testimony on the proposed improvements to Otter Lake Road. No action of the
97 council is required other than to open and close the hearing. Staff anticipates that the council may
98 want to have a discussion about the project at a future work session. Mr. Grochala introduced Jim
99 Studenski, TKDA, who briefly reviewed the project feasibility study.
100
101 Mayor Reinert opened the public hearing at 6:58 p.m.
102
103 Daniel Beeson, Levander, Gillen & Miller, P.A., noted that he is representing Richard Shreier and
104 related owners. He is present to voice objection to the project as proposed. They believe the project
105 is premature and ill timed for the current market. They believe that, as proposed, the costs should be
106 born differently, with public contribution for the benefit. There are many vacant properties in the area
107 and rather than focus development wider with these improvements, the area under development (Main
108 Street Village) should be the key. Since the roadway is designed to move people as a minor arterial, it
109 would seem to be properly paid for by the greater community and not just adjacent property owners.
110 Also they believe the project as proposed represents overbuilding.
111
112 Bruce Miller, MFC Properties, owner of the northeast quadrant property. They believe the plans for
113 improvements have been in place for a long time, they have invested in the area and plan for
114 development and they await the improvement of Otter Lake Road. They see that this is the natural
115 next step after the recent bridge improvements and support the council moving forward with the plans
116 and specifications at this time.
117
118 Property owner at 7473 24th Av N, spoke in favor of the project moving forward.
119
120 Community Development Director Grochala also noted that the council received an email from Dale
121 Properties /Stonehenge USA, an area property owner, also in favor of moving forward on the project.
122
123 A council member noted that it is no secret that the road will be moving north and while he
124 understands that they have also faced costs relative to the bridge replacement, he believes that getting
125 development going with improvements in the area will help the property owners recoup some of their
126 costs. The landowners will have some time (2 -3 years) to find tenants before having to pay
127 assessments on this project.
128
129 There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed at 7:12 p.m.
130
131 A council member asked staff to respond to the suggestion that the road is oversized and Mr.
132 Grochala explained that it is planned as an arterial street. It is planned to be commercial and certain
133 lane use is necessary. He believes this is a fairly standard layout for what is anticipated in the area.
• 134
135 The council concurred that they will discuss the project at their next work session.
3
P34
COUNCIL MINUTES February 13, 2012
DR4FT
136
137 6B. Resolution No. 12 -11, Authorizing execution of an amendment to the development
138 contracts for Pine Glen and Pine Glen 2 "d Addition - City Engineer Wedel explained that the
139 resolution would authorize certain amendments to the development agreements for the projects noted.
140 The amendments would include language relating to cash escrow and letters of credit. Much of the
141 work on these projects has been completed however the agreement as it is would require that the
142 letters of credit be renewed, at a cost to the developer. Mr. Wedel said that staff is suggesting that the
143 existing escrow funds be used as security against remaining work. The council commended staff for
144 their willingness to work with the developer on this situation.
145
146 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 12 -11 as presented. Council Member
147 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
148
149 6C. 2 "d Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 02 -12, Amending the Town Center Planned
150 Unit Development to add certain office uses to the civil district — City Planner Bengtson noted that
151 the ordinance would add certain office uses to the civic district in order to recognize that the Early
152 Childhood Learning Center will soon be vacating space. Other uses for that space may be viable and
153 should be allowed.
154
155 Council Member Rafferty moved to waive the full reading of the ordinance. Council Member Stoesz
156 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
157
158 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the 2nd Reading and passage of Ordinance No. 02 -12, as
159 presented. Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none.
160
161 6D. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -12, Amending Section 6, Residential Districts, of the
162 Zoning Ordinance — City Planner Bengtson explained that staff is in the process of updating the
163 city's zoning ordinances to reflect the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and is now presenting the
164 Residential Zoning section to the council for review. The changes have been reviewed by the
165 Planning and Zoning Board with some changes added by that group. The nine major changes to this
166 section were noted and read by Mr. Bengtson. He added that there are other minor changes
167 throughout the ordinance that are indicated by strikeout or underline. A council member noted
168 concern about lot minimums and set backs for accessory buildings; he will support the ordinance
169 amendments with some reservations for that reason.
170
171 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -12 as presented.
172 Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
173
174 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
175
176 There was no Unfinished Business.
177
178 NEW BUSINESS
179
180 There was no New Business.
4
• 181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
COMMTJNITY CALENDAR
February 13, 2012 P 3 5
Monday, February 20
Monday, February 27
4. Monday, February 27
Community Calendar — A Look Ahead
February 13, 2012 through February 27, 2012
CITY HALL CLOSED
5:30 pm, Community Room
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
President's Day
Council Work Session
City Council Meeting
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Council Member Rafferty moved to adjourn at 7:35 p.m. Council
Member Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, February 27, 2012.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
•
•
•
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION February 13, 2012 P 3 6
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
: February 13, 2012
. 7:45 p.m.
9:40 p.m.
: Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell,
Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert
: None
Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; City Engineer Jason Wedel;
Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Clerk Julie Bartell
1. Possible Charter Amendment — Chapter 8— Community Development Director
Grochala noted that the question of continuing the process that was started on an
ordinance in 2008 has been researched. The law firm of Kennedy and Graven has
recommended that the city proceed according to a new schedule, citing reasons such as
change in membership and the council since 2008.
Mr. Grochala then reviewed the cover page of his staff report, a schedule for
consideration of a council proposed charter amendment in 2012. The schedule includes
work session and council consideration in March with referral of the ordinance to the
Charter Commission by March 14. The schedule would then allow for a 60 plus 90 day
period for charter consideration and then two weeks for final council consideration of
sending the question to the ballot. The schedule somewhat assumes that the council goes
forward with the ordinance originally proposed by the citizens task force with the change
to remove the exempt zone language. He recalled the process the council followed in
2007 and 2008 in reviewing the original task force amendment, a proposal by former
charter commissioner Bob Bening, and the charter commission substitute proposal. He
also explained the tax exempt bond implications of continuing to have the exempt zones
within the charter language. He noted that the process of review of the amended
ordinance was ended basically with the submission of a citizen petition to put enactment
of Chapter 426 process on the ballot. Under state law, the council didn't have any
recourse other than to put that on the ballot so the decision was made to not have any
other amendments on the ballot because it would be too confusing. The citizen petition
question did not pass and that brings us to the current.
The mayor suggested that staff go through the entire process of road improvements,
comparing what would have to occur with the current charter language compared to what
would happen with the proposed charter language. The council received a chart prepared
by Attorney Steve Bubul comparing elements of all the charter proposals and Chapter
429. He noted that Chapter 429 was basically what the citizen petition proposal brought
forward. Mr. Grochala also reviewed a pavement management policy table that set forth
a standard for financing road improvements. The policy established a maximum
assessment rate and costs to be paid by general property tax levy. It generally resulted in
1
P 3 7 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION February 13, 2012
46 a fixed rate that was clear, that took the subjectivity out of the process and also allowed
47 the city to plan financially. The council heard that the term of a spread assessment is
48 fifteen years, but that is a policy choice. The process would provide predictability to the
49 city and the public. The feasibility study portion of a project allows you to look ahead at
50 all anticipated costs and what improvements are appropriate and needed in the area. For
51 water, it has in the past been considered a safety issue by the fire department.
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63 The mayor proceeded to going down the list, reviewing each area of comparison. When
64 the mayor asked staff what they would view as the biggest problem area, Mr. Grochala
65 suggested the referendum requirement.
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86 A council member asked for a discussion on next steps. How would a five percent
87 proposal fit into the citizen's task force ordinance? The mayor suggested that it was just
88 a concept that revolves around the question of what do you ask the public to decide and
89 what is going to be understandable to them. A council member suggested that the figure
90 isn't static; shouldn't the request be for what is needed? The mayor remarked that it is
The mayor noted, looking at the comparison sheet that the charter commission actually
came back with their proposal that changes seven of the eight things on the list. Mr.
Grochala remarked that the charter proposal actually added more complications than the
existing charter language. The mayor remarked that he looked for things that could be
brought from that proposal and doesn't see any at this point. A council member asked if
things like ignoring the safety of roads doesn't make the city liable in some way and Mr.
Grochala pointed out an email from the League of Minnesota Cities that is included in the
citizen's task force report that responds somewhat to the city's responsibility in getting
work done.
The mayor discussed the feasibility study element and the presumptions that occur
because people believe that everything in the study must be done. There has to be a
point where you can draw a line of what is optional and make it clear that all the costs
aren't necessarily going to occur. Mr. Grochala explained that in a typical process, the
council would be making the project decisions at the time of the public input; the current
charter doesn't allow that decision point. The mayor noted that it must be clear from the
point of the feasibility study that residents have the ability change the project.
In the area of paying for improvements, the mayor threw out the possibility of the city
budgeting five percent of the budget for roads. There could be a one -time question to the
citizens — do you want to set aside five percent of the city budget for road improvements?
It could be a ten year program and, if it doesn't work as needed, it could be ended after
that period. A council member expressed some concern that building up the money
wouldn't necessarily be the most sensible way financially. The mayor suggested that
whatever the way, the payment process needs to be understandable and feel fair to the
citizens. When the topic of the basic cost per mile came up, Mr. Grochala noted that each
improvement project is really unique so you can't really presume something like $1
million a mile.
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION February 13, 2012 P 3 8
91 something that people can understand and something that you could see some results
92 with. Perhaps you could go to referendum if it would go over five percent. A council
93 member suggested that the amendment should rather allow the city to go forward and
94 bond for road improvements under a plan that is publicized to the public. A council
95 member suggested that a levy limit on the budget may be in the future so it may be wise
96 to take that into consideration when planning future finances.
97
98 Staff should crunch the numbers as far as the five percent concept goes and also think
99 about that in relation to a plan for improvements. A council member suggested that the
100 figure be tied to tax capacity rather than budget; it' s a more stable situation. The council
101 would like to hear back from staff on the workability of the idea.
102
103 The council set a special meeting for February 27, 2012, following the regular meeting
104 that night.
105
106 The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
107
108 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
109 February 27, 2012.
110
111
112
113
114 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor
115
3
P39
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM lE
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 12 -13
Extension of Time for Main Street Village
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
In February 2008, the City Council approved the Main Street Village project, including:
• Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat (Resolution No. 08 -17); and
• Conditional Use Permit for a Motor Fuel Station (Resolution 08 -18); and
• Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Car Wash (Resolution 08 -19)
The site has not been developed, but the owner is still interested in pursuing the project.
BACKGROUND
A PUD Development Stage Plan must be followed by the Final Plan application within twelve
months under the zoning ordinance. Likewise, a final plat must be submitted within one year of
the preliminary plat approval under the subdivision regulations. For a conditional use permit
(CUP), construction must begin within one year of approval. Extensions have been granted by
the City Council through Resolutions 09 -76, 10 -33, 10 -77, 11 -29, and 11 -84. A PUD can be
extended for period of six months under the zoning ordinance.
When built, this project would provide new commercial tax revenue near the I -35E interchange.
The recommendation is to extend the deadlines. Since the final plat must be approved prior to
construction of the infrastructure needed by any uses on the site, construction of the gas station
and car wash can begin later than the final plat submittal.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 12 -13 granting extensions for submitting the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat
and for construction to begin on the motor fuel station and carwash.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Number 12 -13
P40
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: •
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -13
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME ON THE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAN /FINAL PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
FOR MAIN STREET VILLAGE
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2008 the City Council granted approvals for the Main
Street Village project with the following actions:
- Resolution No. 08 -17, a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development -
Development Stage Plan /Preliminary Plat; and
- Resolution No. 08 -18, a Conditional Use Permit for a Motor Fuel Station; and
- Resolution No. 08 -19, a Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Car Wash.
and
WHERAS, Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. of the City's Zoning Ordinance, requires that a
PUD Final Plan /Final Plat be submitted within one year of approval of the PUD
Development Stage Plan but allows an extension for six month intervals; and
WHERAS, Section 1001.055 of City Code (Subdivision Regulations) requires a final plat
be submitted within one year of approval of the preliminary plat unless an extension is
requested and for good cause is granted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 2, Subd. 2.B.11. of the City's Zoning Ordinance states that if
construction has not begun within one year of approval of a conditional use permit the
permit is void; and
WHEREAS, the motor fuel station and car wash approved with Resolutions 08 -18 and
08 -19 cannot receive building permits until the final plat has been approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved previous extensions of project deadlines with
Resolutions 09 -76, 10 -33, 10 -77, 11 -29, and 11 -84; and
WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for additional extension;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is good cause to grant an extension
because the economic conditions of the real estate market have affected development
nationally, regionally, and locally;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the following extensions:
•
•
•
•
1. A PUD Final Plan /Final Plat application for the CUP /PUD approved with
Resolution No. 08 -17 must be submitted by September 1, 2012.
2. Construction on the motor fuel station and car wash approved with Resolutions
No. 08 -18 and 08 -19 shall begin within six months of final plat approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all of the conditions of approval included in
Resolution Nos. 08 -17, 08 -18, and 08 -19 continue to apply.
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 11 -84. page 2
P41
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM IF
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 12 -14
Extension of Time for The Preserve
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
In 2006 the City Council approved The Preserve, a residential subdivision. This approval
included Ordinance 08 -06, a Rezone to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Resolution 06-
137 approving a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat. The site has not been
developed, but the owner is still interested in pursuing the project.
BACKGROUND
A PUD Development Stage Plan must be followed by the Final Plan application within twelve
months under the zoning ordinance. Likewise, a final plat must be submitted within one year of
the preliminary plat approval under the subdivision regulations. The City extended the deadline
with Resolutions 08 -109, 09 -77, 10 -34, 10 -86, 11 -30, and 11 -85.
We did receive a final plat application though there were pieces of information still lacking.
Staff did bring it to the Planning & Zoning Board, which gave a recommendation based on
receiving the missing pieces. All incomplete and missing elements must be submitted before the
application is complete and the final plat is brought to the City Council for approval.
Preservation of open space on this site is an important step for implementing the City's larger
greenway vision. The site includes a high value natural resource area. Permanent open space
behind most lots extends for hundreds of feet and will be in a permanent conservation easement.
The approval included a restoration and management plan for wetlands and other open space.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 11 -85 granting an extension for submitting the PUD -Final Plan/Final
Plat.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Number 12 -14
P42
P43
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 41)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -14
APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMITTAL OF
THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAN AND FINAL PLAT
FOR THE PRESERVE
WHEREAS, on August 28 and September 11, 2006 the City Council granted approvals
for the The Preserve project with the following actions:
- Ordinance 08 -06: Rezone to Planned Unit Development (PUD)
- Resolution 06 -137: PUD Development Stage Plan /Preliminary Plat
and
WHERAS, Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. of the City's Zoning Ordinance, requires that a
PUD -final plan be submitted within one year of approval of the PUD Development Stage
Plan /Preliminary Plat but allows an extension for six month intervals, and the extension
can be approved after the deadline date passes; and
WHERAS, Section 1001.055 of City Code (Subdivision Regulations) requires a final plat
be submitted within one year of approval of the preliminary plat unless an extension is
requested and for good cause is granted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City granted extensions with Resolutions 08 -109, 09 -77, 10 -34, 10 -86,
11 -30, and 11 -85; and
WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for additional extension; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is good cause to grant an extension
because the economic conditions of the real estate market have affected development
nationally, regionally, and locally;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves an extension for submittal of the PUD Final Plan /Final Plat application
for the Planned Unit Development originally approved with Resolution No. 06 -137.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions apply:
1. The PUD Final Plan /Final Plat application must be submitted by October 1, 2012.
2. All of the conditions of approval included in Resolution No. 06 -137 continue to apply.
•
•
•
•
•
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 11 -85, page 2
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 1G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 12 -15
Extension of Time for Moon Marsh
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
In 2007 the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit and Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Development Stage Plan for the Moon Marsh project with Resolution No. 07 -142. The
site has not been developed, but the owner is still interested in pursuing the project.
BACKGROUND
The Zoning Ordinance requires that a PUD Development Stage Plan be followed by the PUD
Final Plan application within twelve months under the zoning ordinance. Likewise, a final plat
must be submitted within one year of the preliminary plat approval under the subdivision
regulations. For a conditional use permit (CUP), construction must begin within one year of
approval. The project did not meet these deadlines due to the widespread slowdown in
development in the region, and the City has granted several extensions. The current submittal
deadline for the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat is April 1, 2011, and the recommendation is to extend
it to October 1, 2012.
The Moon Marsh site includes a high value natural resource area. Permanent open space is to be
created within the site that will be placed in a permanent conservation easement. The
preservation of open space on this site will be a step in the implementation of the City's larger
greenway vision, a foundation of the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 12 -15 granting an extension of time for submittal of the PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat and for construction to begin under the Conditional Use Permit.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Number 12 -15
P45
P46
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 41)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -15
APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAN
AND FINAL PLAT FOR MOON MARSH
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2007 the City Council granted approvals for the Moon
Marsh project with Resolution 07 -142 approving a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Unit Development and PUD Development Plan /Preliminary Plat; and
WHERAS, Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. of the City's Zoning Ordinance, requires that a
PUD -final plan be submitted within one year of approval of the PUD - development stage
plan but allows an extension for six month intervals, and the extension can be approved
after the deadline date passes; and
WHERAS, Section 1001.055 of City Code (Subdivision Regulations) requires a final plat
be submitted within one year of approval of the preliminary plat unless an extension is
requested and for good cause is granted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 2, Subd. 2.8.11. of the City's Zoning Ordinance states that if
construction has not begun within one year of approval of a conditional use permit the
permit is void; and
WHEREAS, the City granted extensions with Resolution Nos. 08 -106, 09 -78, 10 -35, 10-
87, 11 -31 and 11 -96; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is good cause to grant an extension
because the economic conditions of the real estate market have affected development
nationally, regionally, and locally;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the following extensions:
1. A PUD Final Plan /Final Plat application for the CUP /PUD approved with Resolution
No. 07 -142 must be submitted by October 1, 2012.
2. Construction shall begin within six months of final plat approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all of the conditions of approval included in
Resolution No. 07 -142 continue to apply.
•
•
• Jeff Reinert, Mayor
•
•
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 11 -96, page 2
P47
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Resolution Authorizing Fire Chief to Seek Legislative Changes
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is being asked to consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing Fire Chief
Jerry Streich to work with our local state representatives to introduce legislative changes that
would allow for more local control of ambulance services by designating its primary service
area (PSA).
BACKGROUND
At the October 27, 2011 and January 26, 2012 steering committee meetings, Chief Streich
introduced and expounded on the idea of the Centennial Fire District providing ambulance
services to the three communities. The primary reasons for his proposal was to: (1) help offset
the costs of future daytime fire personnel, (2) maintain local control, (3) provide better quality
care, and (4) generate additional revenue for district operations and equipment. The steering
commission approved this concept at its January 26, 2012 meeting.
Current law requires the EMS regulatory board (EMSRB) to "designate each licensed
ambulance service as serving a primary service area or areas." There are two private
ambulance services within the fire district. North Memorial covers the majority of Lino Lakes
and Centerville. Allina covers the far western portion of Lino Lakes and all of Circle Pines.
A bill has been drafted, which would permit a local government to first designate a primary
service area and then assign a licensed ambulance service to serve the area. This would bring
about a major change in how service areas are designated.
The resolution you are considering at tonight's meeting would authorize Chief Streich to
officially represent the fire district in pursuing legislative changes that would allow for local
control of ambulance services. Mr. Streich will be attending the meeting to explain this
proposal and the steps he is taking to work with local legislators.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 12 -19, authorizing Fire Chief Jerry Streich to explore legislative changes
to allow for local control of ambulance services.
P48
P49
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -19
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
CHIEF TO EXPLORE LEGISLATIVE CHANGES TO ALLOW FOR
LOCAL CONTROL OF AMBULANCE SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes participates in a joint powers agreement with the
cities of Centerville and Circle Pines that created Centennial Fire District to provide emergency
fire and first response medical service, and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District has provided medical services to the residents
of its member communities since 1985; and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District is recognized for a high level of medical
services, which provides a minimum EMT level response for all medical calls; and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District responds to over 680 medical calls a year; and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District is typically at the scene before an ambulance
provider; and
WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District has assessed its capabilities and believes it
could provide more timely transport of patients as the primary ambulance provider for the
community; and
WHEREAS, there are legislative hurdles that restrict local decisions on ambulance
services; and
WHEREAS, local governments are in the best position to make decisions about the
provision of local ambulance services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Lino Lakes City Council as follows:
1. The Centennial Fire District Chief is authorized to meet with other interested cities in
developing legislative changes to allow for local control of ambulance services.
2. The Centennial Fire District Chief is authorized to work with local legislators in
developing appropriate legislation that give cities the right to local deteimination.
3. Subsequent to the legislature granting authority for local determination of the
ambulance provider, Centennial Fire District shall submit a service plan and
recommendation to each participating city for a decision.
4. The City acknowledges that an affirmative determination by each of the three cities
will be required before implementation could begin.
Adopted this 27th day of February, 2012, by the Lino Lakes City Council.
This resolution was introduced by Council Member and duly seconded by
Council Member , and upon a vote being taken thereof, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
•
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
•
•
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
P50
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3B
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
February 27, 2012
First Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12, Amending Title 700,
Chapters 701 and 702 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances,
regarding Liquor and Beer Licensing, adding Off -Sale Growler
License
3/5
INTRODUCTION
In 2011, Minnesota state law was changed to create a new class of liquor license called a
brewer taproom license. The "Surly Bill," as it became known, provides new opportunities for
micro breweries to sell their malt liquor products directly to the public on -site. Shortly after the
passage of that bill, the City Council discussed the potential economic development
opportunities for the City and directed staff to initiate the zoning ordinance and City Code
amendments necessary to provide for brewery type uses
BACKGROUND
There are basically three types of serving licenses for breweries.
Licenses that are now available in the City
1. On -Sale Brewer Taproom — Available to a state - licensed brewery (limited in size). The
license allows the on -sale of only the brewery's product in a facility adjacent to the brewery.
The City Council approved the addition of this license to the City Code on January 9, 2012.
2. Brew Pub — Retail Restaurants/bars that have obtained a brew pub license from the state
may on -sale their brewed product. This type of activity would require an on -sale liquor license
from the city, a license that is already in the City Code. The state however, not the city, issues
the brew pub license.
New license to be made available in the City
3. Off -Sale Growler — Both Brew Pubs and Brewer Taprooms may offer off -sale of their
product. The product must be packaged only in "growler" containers, as defined by state
statute. This type of sale must follow the same hours as other off -sale and the license fee is
capped by statute just as for regular off -sale licenses. Staff is presenting an ordinance at this
time that would add an "Off -Sale Growler" license to the City Code.
P51
P52
Attached Ordinance No. 04 -12 would add Off -Sale Growler as a city issued liquor license and
would also add language to the Beer Code recognizing this type of sales. An establishment that
is seeking this type of license from the city must first be licensed as a brewery by the state,
must meet the recently updated City zoning requirements for brewery operations, and must
meet the city's regular liquor licensing requirements.
Related to adding this new license to the City Code is the establishment of an appropriate
license fee that correlates to the city's cost of licensing and enforcement. The City's current
license fee for off -sale is $200 per year. Staff is suggesting this amount be designated as the
fee for Off -Sale Growler also. It is the council's prerogative to set the license fee.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 04 -12,
Amending Title 700, Chapters 701 and 702 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances relating to
Liquor Licensing and Beer Licensing, adding Off -Sale Growler License and establishing an
annual license fee.
•
•
•
•
1st Reading:
Publication:
2nd Reading:
Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 04 -12
AMENDING TITLE 700, CHAPTERS 701 AND 702 OF THE LINO
LAKES CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO LIQUOR LICENSING AND
BEER LICENSING.
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, does ordain:
Section 1. That Section 701.02 (1)(a) of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances
be amended as follows:
701.02 LICENSE REQUIRED
(1) General requirements.
(a) No person, except a wholesaler or manufacturer, to the extent authorized under
state license, shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell or keep for sale in the city any
intoxicating liquor without first obtaining a license to do so as provided in this chapter.
Each license shall be issued for a maximum period of one year, expiring on June 30 of
each year. All licenses shall expire on the same date except temporary licenses that shall
expire according to their terms. Liquor licenses shall be ofei-ghtnine kinds:
1. On -sale;
2. On -sale wine;
3. Off -sale;
4. Club license;
5. Sunday on -sale;
6. Temporary set -up license;
7. Temporary on -sale;
8. On -sale brewer taproom; and
9. Off -sale growler.
Section 2. That Section 701.02 of the Lino Lake Code of Ordinances be
amended by adding a new Subdivision 10 to read as follows:
P53
P54
(10) Off-sale growler. An off-sale growler license authorizes off -sale of malt
liquor produced by a brewer and packaged in 64 ounce or 750 milliliter containers that
are designed, sealed and labeled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.301,
subdivision 7(b), as it may be amended from time to time. Only brewers licensed under
Minnesota Statutes section 340A.301. subdivision 6(d). (i) or (j) are eligible for an off -
sale scowler license. subject to the limitations set forth in subdivision 7(b) of that statute.
Section 3. That Section 702.02 (1) of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances be
amended as follows:
(1) Licenses. No person, except wholesalers and manufacturers to the extent
authorized by law, and except brewers with an on -sale brewer taproom license, shall deal
in or dispose of by gift or otherwise, or keep or offer for sale, any beer within the city
without first having received a license as hereinafter provided. Licenses shall be of thfee
four kinds:
(a) Regular on -sale
(b) Temporary on -sale; and
(c) Off - sale.; and
(d) Off -sale growler.
Section 4. That Section 702.02 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances be
amended by adding a new Subdivision 5 to read as follows:
(5) Off -sale growler. An off -sale growler license authorizes off -sale of beer
produced by a brewer and packaged in 64 ounce or 750 milliliter containers that
are designed, sealed and labeled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section
340A.301, subdivision 7(b), as it may be amended from time to time. Only
brewers licensed under Minnesota Statutes section 340A301, subdivision 6(d),
(i) or (j) are eligible for an off -sale growler license, subject to the limitations set
forth in subdivision 7(b) of that statute.
Section 5. That the City Fee Schedule be amended as follows:
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
Off -sale growler (greater than 3.2 percent
alcohol by weight) $ /Year
Off -sale growler (beer: no more than 3.2
percent alcohol by weight) $ /Year
2
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2012
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council
Member and was duly seconded by Council Member and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
•
3
P55
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 3C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Karison, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Deicing Grant
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The Council is being asked to consider approving a joint grant application through the Rice
Creek Watershed District 2012 Urban Stormwater Remediation Cost -Share Program. Lino
Lakes would join the cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, and Lexington in applying
for grant funding to integrate anti -icing into its winter road maintenance operations.
BACKGROUND
Anti -icing is a proactive approach to winter maintenance for roads. It involves the application
of a liquid brine solution to the road surface before a winter storm event. This helps to prevent
snow and ice from bonding to the pavement. The result is a more complete removal of snow
and ice when plow trucks clear the roads. Anti -icing often eliminates the need for scraping and
re- salting the streets a second or third time after a single storm event. The integration of anti -
icing is recognized as a Best Management Practice.
If the grant is successful, Lino Lakes would benefit by the reduction of chlorides into area
waters, the reduction of sediments to surface waters, and the reduction of costs, especially the
cost of removing sand on City streets.
The Rice Creek Watershed District has made available $185,000 in cost -share funding to assist
local governments incorporate water quality improvement practices. The cost - sharing is based
on 50% of estimated project costs, not to exceed $50,000 per project.
The estimated cost for Lino Lakes to purchase the equipment needed to convert to the salt brine
system is $34,000. Based on a grant award of $50,000, the City's share would $15,125. Lino
Lakes' local match would be $18,875.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the City of Lino Lakes' participation in the grant application through the Rice Creek
Watershed District Urban Stormwater Remediation Cost - Sharing Program.
P55.
RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
4325 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE #611 • Blaine, MN 55449 -4539
Phone: 763- 398 -3070 • Fax: 763- 398 -3088
www.ricecreek.org
December 16, 2011
Request for Proposals: Rice Creek Watershed District
2012 Urban Stormwater Remediation Cost -Share Program
In keeping with the goals and objectives outlined in our current Watershed Management Plan and as part of our
continued efforts to protect and enhance those water resources, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is
making available approximately $185,000 in cost -share funding to assist counties, cities, townships, school
districts, libraries and other public and private entities located within the RCWD to incorporate water quality
improvement practices into redevelopment, roadway and storm sewer improvement projects in 2012. Funding
will only be available for the water quality improvement portions of a project that are not part of a permit
requirement. Cost- sharing will be based on 50% of estimated project costs or bid cost, whichever is lower, not
to exceed $50,000 per project. Please review our Program Guidelines and Application Form for more
information regarding eligibility, acceptable types of projects and the process for participating in the program.
lil
ES YOEIR PROJECT PROPOSAL FIT THIS DESC iPT11 E N?
The proposed project must be located in a sub - watershed containing one of the following waterbodies:
Lakes: Bald Eagle, Centerville, Golden, Hart, Island, Johanna, Jones, Josephine, Karth, Langton,
Little Johanna, Little Josephine, Locke, Long, Marsden, Martha, Moore, Pike, Pine Tree, Poplar,
Round, Rush, Silver, Spring, Sunfish, Sunset, Turtle, Walsh, White Bear, Zimmerman
Streams: Hardwood Creek
Contact the RCWD if you need assistance determining sub - watershed boundaries for these waterbodies.
Your project uses Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed to enhance water quality treatment from
redevelopment, roadway, trail, and storm sewer improvement projects. RCWD will not provide funding
for new development projects or portions of projects necessary to meet RCWD permit requirements.
The project demonstrates a measurable reduction of runoff volume, nutrients, sediments, chlorides,
and /or oxygen - demanding substances to a qualified waterbody.
If your project proposal is consistent with the above criteria, please review the attached program guidelines. An
application form is available for download at www.ricecreek.org /grants. To submit a proposal complete the
application form and return it, along with all required components, to the RCWD office no later than 4:30 p.m.
on Wednesday, March 14, 2012. If you have any questions, please contact Kyle Axtell, Water Resource
Specialist, at 763 -398 -3072 or kaxtell @ricecreek.org.
Sincerely,
plj
Phil Belfiori
RCWD Administrator
BOARD OF Barbara A. Haake Steven P. Wagamon Harley M. Ogata Patricia L. Preiner John J. Waller
MANAGERS Ramsey County Anoka County Ramsey County Anoka County Washington County
® Punted on sos. •cyckvt IOU p<,u con... r wPH uu,eg mv1 b ok
•
•
•
•
IC
O
1-
co
co
0
000000 0 0 0
000 0 0 0 0 0 0
o d o 0 o v o
O N N r oN r
CO O C
� CO CO
Efi 64 6,4 69 EA- 64 Efl 64 60 J
0 0 0 0 0 0 r') ti
000000 CV I�
• 0"t000.:1- CCi CO
_ , E o6 L . 6 o cri cD
r r
1
Ip—�
C1) 646469646469 E9
LO LO
g 0 C,m (D
W1O)t c
t
z
.X
x3 Efi 64 64 Ef3
O 000000 0
LC)
-
- 6=000000 C 0
O CD et Lri U7 CD
r! V H? tf}EA EST 69 Efi Efl 'tfl
Ce N000000 CO 0
o Y 000000 c- CO
E.L. J O CD CO LC) Cn { co
r Eq)
® O
J EFt 64 Eft Ers —u.r fl Efl 'Ef}
< w O O o O CEO r')
CS54. 6 to O Ci
) r
Zi CDC � 1 64 64 6,4 64 E
O.= v 69-
• 00000
00000
• 0 0 0 0 0
• oEYivi6
I— o - z°
C _Eflb9(f} 64
Local Match
DUPAGE RIVER
SALT CREEK
WORKGROUP
2008
Chloride Usage Education and Reduction Program
R11R IE WINKS Bi1 EETU1 E /STAff
Salt Improves Winter Road Conditions
But Harms Ecosystems
Keeping roads and parking areas free of ice and snow
is an essential part of modern life. However road
salt — one of the main tools used to achieve this task
— contains chloride as its principal ingredient. Chloride
does more than melt snow and ice; it negatively impacts
local lakes and rivers. Other minor ingredients of
commercial road salt include arsenic and cyanide.
As snow and ice melt, they drain into landscaped
areas or storm sewers, and then to natural bodies
of water. Waters from a deiced area contain
high levels of chlorides, which do not degrade,
and there is no cost- effective way to remove it.
Excessive levels of chlorides can severely impair
the ability of plants to absorb water and nutrients.
These negative effects are common to both
aquatic and terrestrial plants in residential gardens,
landscaped areas, and rivers. Fish and other aquatic
organisms are then impacted by the decline in habitat.
Salt Reduction is an Environmental
Concern Attracting Regulators
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
set total maximum daily loads (TMDL) for chloride
in the Upper DuPage River and Salt Creek.These
TMDLs state that the legal level of chloride in the
rivers is being exceeded, and require that the levels
be reduced. In order to investigate current usage of
chlorides and possible reduction strategies, the DuPage
River Salt Creek Workgroup ( DRSCW) conducted
a Chloride Usage Education and Reduction Program
Study. Based on a survey of 39 communities and eight
private companies in the watersheds, 1 17,000 tons of
chloride are used annually.This figure does not include
residential use, meaning actual usage rates are much
Some communities are switching
from routine salt application to
alternative forms of deicing. This
protects the environment while
potentially saving communities
thousands of dollars. (Photos
courtesy Forest Preserve District
of DuPage County and City of
Naperville)
higher. Local municipalities may consider adopting
practices that will allow them to maintain service levels
but use less road salt
Alternatives to Salt Can Save Public
Agencies Considerable Funds
The DRSCW is not recommending that salting stop.
Road salting and resulting chlorides play a huge role
in public safety. However, using less salt in general can
Small mouth bass are
found in both branches
of the DuPage River and
Salt Creek. Chlorides
from road salt damage
river vegetation, reducing
the numbers and species
of fish that can survive
there. (Photo courtesy
Forest Preserve District
of DuPage County)
•
•
13JIBiiE VMS 11RE%Ti1RR/ST
Chloride Usage Education and Reductiionfro!ram
help reduce chloride levels and help the community
— environmentally and financially.
■ The City of Toronto reduced its salt use by 25% by
educating staff on proper salting techniques.The
resulting annual savings was approximately $ 1.8
million.
■ Quebec also reduced its salt usage, trained staff on
proper salting and plowing techniques, and used
pre - wetted salt.The result was a benefit -to -cost
ratio of 2.8: I .
Cost - Effective Alternatives to Road Salting
The DRSCW Chloride Reduction Study suggests
a number of ways to improve current road salting
practices.
Anti -icing applies salt to the roads prior to a
forecasted storm, preventing the formation of ice,
sue. which provides material
and cost savings.
Minnesota's Department
of Transportation reported
using 75% less salt with
anti -icing compared
to conventional salting
practices. Agencies in
Montana, Colorado, and
Oregon also reported cost
savings as high as 41, 52,
and 75 %, respectively.
Anti -icing liquid was efficiently
contained on site at a public
works department during a pilot
study. (Photo courtesy City of
Naperville)
Pre - wetting salt has
been shown to produce
material and cost savings
— as much as 53% in some
communities. Pre - wetted salt is more likely to stay in
the distribution area than be scattered by wind and
traffic. Pre - wetting practices are also highly efficient as
the salt is treated with moisture, which accelerates the
de -icing process.
Plowing just before salting prevents the application of
salt on heavy snow.Transporting large snow mounds to
a disposal facility keeps additional plowing efforts from
being inhibited.
Proper Salt Storage and Handling is covered in the
Salt Institute's Salt Storage Handbook. Practices include
locating storage sites down gradient of any water supply
wells, protecting salt stockpiles from precipitation and
wind by using structural roofs or temporary covers, and
storing salt on impermeable pads.
Application Practices for Salt
Public works departments that continue to use
conventional salt application practices can reduce
the levels of chloride by adopting the "Just Enough"
principle. Communities invest significant funds to
purchase salt each season; reduced application
translates into financial savings.
To provide efficient road clearing, public works staff
should be educated in proper spreading procedures and
the environmental impact of their work.This includes
optimizing spreader routes to eliminate leftover salt
and dead - heading (driving without spreading). Spreading
equipment should also be calibrated regularly and
records kept on the salt used for each truck and route.
Actual usage should be compared against prescribed
spreading rates to eliminate overuse and inefficiencies.
The DuPage River Salt Creek Workgroup
The DuPage River Salt Creek Workgroup is a coalition
of communities, sanitary districts, environmental
organizations, and professionals working to improve the
ecological health of Salt Creek and the Upper DuPage
River. For more information go to www.DRSCWor-g
Funding for this fact sheet is provided in part by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency through Section 3 14 of the Cleon Water Act.
DUPAGE RIVER
SALT CREEK
WORKGROUP
2008
Chloride Osage Education and Reduction Program
Salt Improves Winter Driveway
Conditions But Harms Ecosystems
Keeping roads and parking areas free of ice and snow
is an essential part of modern life. However; road
salt — one of the main tools used to achieve this task
— contains chloride as its principal ingredient. Chloride
does more than melt snow and ice; it negatively impacts
local lakes and rivers. Other minor ingredients of
commercial road salt include arsenic and cyanide.
Municipalities contrib-
ute more than 1 17,000
tons of chloride to local
watersheds annually.
Chloride never fully
dissipates. and enters
streams. where it harms
the flora and fauna.
(Photo courtesy City of
Naperville)
As snow and ice melt, they drain into landscaped
areas or storm sewers, and then to natural bodies of
water.Waters from a deiced area contain high levels of
chlorides, which do not degrade, and there is no cost -
effective way to remove it. Excessive levels of chlorides
can severely impair the ability of plants to absorb water
and nutrients.These negative effects are common to
both aquatic and terrestrial plants in residential gardens,
landscaped areas, and rivers. Fish and other aquatic
organisms are then impacted by the decline in habitat.
How Much Salt is Getting into Our
Rivers?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set
total maximum daily loads (TMDL) for chloride in the
DuPage River and Salt Creek.These TMDLs state
Residential deicing
contributes to the
degradation of the
area's water resources.
Using the "Just Enough"
principle and a more
eco- friendly deicer will
help reduce the impact
of chloride on our
ecosystem.
that the legal level of chloride in the rivers is being
exceeded, and require that the levels be reduced.
In order to investigate current usage of chlorides
and possible reduction strategies, the DuPage River
Salt Creek Workgroup conducted a Chloride Usage
Education and Reduction Program Study.The study gave
a conservative estimate of the annual chloride use in
the watersheds of the upper DuPage and Salt Creek,
which exceeded 1 17,000 tons.
Efficient Deicing Protects Landscaping
In addition to harming the ecosystem, overusing
chloride can damage residential greenery such as grass,
plants, and trees, reversing any beautification efforts you
have made.
Small mouth bass are
found in both branches
of the DuPage River and
Salt Creek. Chlorides
from road salt damage
river vegetation, reducing
the numbers and species
of fish that can survive
there. (Photo courtesy
Forest Preserve District
of DuPage County)
•
•
Chloride Usage Education and Reduction Program
What is being done to reduce
chloride usage?
Roads must remain dear to protect public safety,
and the Workgroup does not recommend that
road salting cease. However, many communities
are already employing alternative technologies to
deice their roads, such as anti - icing, which applies
salt brine to roads when a storm is forecasted,
and prevents the formation of ice. Residents can
use a similar treatment method by purchasing
a deicing alternative to salt available in some
grocers or hardware stores. If you must use salt,
the Chloride Usage Study recommends employing
the "Just Enough" principle — applying just enough
salt to keep your property ice -free.
What can 1 do to help?
• Shovel (or use a snow blower) before you use
any product; never put a deicing product on
top of snow.
• Adopt the' Just Enough" principle, putting down
just enough product to keep high traffic areas clear
of ice.
• Sweep up un- dissolved product after a storm is
over for reuse.
• Consider switching to a non - chloride deicer.
• Support changes in chloride application in your
municipality.
• Inform a neighbor about the impacts chlorides have
in our streams and rivers.
Shoveling prior to deicing
product application will
increase that product's
efficiency.
Some communities are switching
from routine salt application to
alternative forms of deicing. This
protects the environment while
saving communities thousands
of dollars. (Photos courtesy
Forest Preserve District of DuPage
County and City of Naperville)
The DuPage River Salt Creek Workgroup
The DuPage River Salt Creek Workgroup is a coalition
of communities, sanitary districts, environmental
organizations, and professionals working to improve the
ecological health of Salt Creek and the Upper DuPage
River. For more information go to www.DRSCWorg
for More information ...
For more information, contact the DuPage River Salt
Creek Workgroup at:
Stephen McCracken
The Conservation Foundation
10 S 404 Knoch Knolls Road
Naperville, IL 60565
Ph: (630) 768 7427
or (630) 428 4500 ext 18
Fax: (630)428 4599
http: / /www.drscw.org_
Funding for this fact sheet is provided in port by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency through Section 319 of the Clean Water Act.
P56
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2012
TOPIC: i. Second Reading of Ordinance Number 3 -12
ii. Resolution 12 -16 - Summary for Publication
Amending the residential zoning districts within the Zoning
Ordinance
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 (3/5 for summary resolution)
INTRODUCTION
The newly adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan established new policies for how residential
development will occur in Lino Lakes. The zoning ordinance is an important element in the
implementation of such policies, and many amendments will be required to bring the zoning
ordinance in alignment with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In addition, a number of
housekeeping and procedural items have been identified by city staff and should also be
addressed at this time.
BACKGROUND
Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance contains all of the basic requirements for the Residential
Zoning Districts within the city. Staff has comprehensively reviewed this section of the
ordinance and determined a number of changes that must be made to properly implement the
2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed staff recommended
amendments and identified additional changes that should be made.
The result of these efforts is now being presented to the City Council for consideration. The
format of the section will remain essentially the same, however a residential district that has not
been used in the city since its adoption (R -EC) will be eliminated.
The table of contents for the section will be as follows:
Subdivision 1 R -1, Single Family Residential
Subdivision 2 R -1X, Single Family Executive
Subdivision 3 Left Blank Intentionally R EC, Single Family Estate Conservation District
Subdivision 4 R -2, Two Family Residential
• Subdivision 5 R -3, Medium Density Residential
Subdivision 6 R -4, High Density Residential
Subdivision 7 R -6, Manufactured Home Park District
P57
The attached ordinance language clearly shows all amendments, but for the purpose of
presentation, staff has identified the following nine changes as being major in scope or impact:
1. Purpose statements amended to clarify that public utilities are required for development
and that development densities must be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
2. Buffers (as already required in the landscape standards) have been added to each district.
3. Impervious surface percentages have been set to those of the Comprehensive Plan goals.
4. The minimum building size calculations have been clarified and the minimum building
size requirements standardized.
5. Recreational facilities have been clearly defined to exclude off -road vehicle courses.
6. The R -EC zoning district has been eliminated since it was never used after its adoption.
7. The R -2 district has been re -written to allow single family and attached two- family
dwelling units. The lot standards and setbacks have also been adjusted to allow single
family homes to potentially meet the minimum density requirement of the Medium
Residential land use category. To keep small -lot developments from taking on a `snout
house' appearance, with nothing but garage doors visible from the street, the R -2
standards include some garage /facade requirements.
8. Manufactured Home Parks are, by state law, allowed on any land guided medium and
high density residential. As a result, the use of `Manufactured Home Parks' has been
added to the R -2, R -3, and R -4 districts as a Conditional Use, with the standards included
in Section 6, Subdivision 7 as base conditions.
9. The R -3 and R -4 districts have increased setbacks and buffering requirements when
adjacent to land that is guided Low Density Residential.
There are also additional minor changes throughout this section that are identified with the
typical strike- though and underlining of ordinance amendments.
City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 3 -12 on February 13, 2012.
RECOMMENDATIONS
On August 10, 2011 the Planning and Zoning Board discussed the proposed amendment,
ultimately recommending approval of the ordinance changes.
Staff recommends approval of the first reading of Ordinance Number 3 -12.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance Number 3 -12
2
•
•
•
•
•
1St Reading:
Publication:
2"d Reading:
Effective:
Council Member
moved for adoption of the following ordinance:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 3 -12
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
REVISE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2030
COMPRHENSIVE PLAN
Section 1 Findings
Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires consideration of possible
adverse effects of a proposed zoning amendment and that the judgment of a proposed
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall be based upon, but not limited to, the
following factors:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of, and has been found to be consistent with, the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
The purpose of this amendment is to implement portions of the newly adopted
2030 comprehensive plan, and to make minor housekeeping changes as
necessary.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the
area.
The changes contained within this amendment will increase the compatibility
between present and future land uses.
3. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained herein.
This ordinance will reflect the goals of the comprehensive plan and will
establish performance standards for residential development within the city.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity.
The proposed amendment will require the city's service capacities to be
considered when developing residential properties, and is based on the 2030
comprehensive plan which appropriately considers service capacity.
3
P58
P59
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
The proposed amendment will not affect traffic generation, as the properties it
will be applied on are already guided by the comprehensive plan for
residential development of varying density.
The Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the amendment on
August 10, 2011, and unanimously recommended approval of the amendment.
Section 2 Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Approved
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains that Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance be
amended per attachment A of this ordinance.
Section 3 Zoning Ordinance and City Code Stand as Amended
As above amended, the Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 4 In Effect According to City Charter
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
4
•
ATTACHMENT A
SECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Subd. 1. R -1, Single Family Residential District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those
persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. This district
is intended for development of single family detached homes on lots served with
public sanitary sewer and water. Land to be zoned R -1 shall be served with public
sanitary sewer and water; shall be in a Low Density Residential and use category
according to the comprehensive plan: and development density shall be consistent
with that land use category.
Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Lot Size. Ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) square feet
contiguous buildable land as defined by Section 1, Subd. 2.B.
2. Minimum Lot Width.
a. Interior Lots. Eighty (80) feet.
b. Corner Lots. One hundred (100) feet.
c. Lots of one and one -half (1.5) acres recorded prior to 22 February
1988 may be resubdivided in accordance with the following:
1) Interior Lots. Seventy -five (75) feet.
2) Corner Lots. Ninety -five (95) feet.
3. Minimum Lot Depth. One hundred thirty -five (135) feet.
a. Double Frontage Lots. One hundred forty -five (145) feet.
4. Building Setbacks. (Thc grcatcr of the following:)
a. From Streets (Principal and Accessory Buildings)-
1) Local Street. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (40) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -1
P60
P61
1) Principal Building. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
c. Side Yard.
1) Principal Building. Ten (10) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
5. Buffer. Any property adjacent to a collector or arterial street shall provide a
fifteen (15) foot buffer in accordance with Section 3.Subdivision 4.Q.
C. Impervious Surface Coverage. The impervious surface of the property shall not
exceed forty percent (40 %). In no event shall off street parking space, structures of
D. Building Requirements.
1. The minimum footprint, Tess garage area, for a single family dwelling unit
shall be eight hundred fifty (850) square feet.
be-as-follows:,
3 Bedroom Rambler
2 Bedroom Rambler
1 1/2 Story
Split Foyer /Entry
Split Level 3 level minimum
Two Story
•
1,050 square foot
1,010 cquarc feet
980 square feet
980 square feet
980 square feet
850 square feet
2. All dwellings without basements in this district shall be required to provide an
additional one hundred (100) square feet of floor area to house utilities.
3. All dwellings shall have a double garage at a minimum.
4. All dwellings shall comply with the Design and Construction Standards of
Section 3. Subd. 4.B.
E. Height Regulations. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed
thirty -five (35) feet in height- except as allowed by Section 3, Subd. 4.C.
F. Sanitary Sewer. No R -1 subdivision creating a lot less than ten (10) acres shall be
permitted in this district without public sanitary sewer and water.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -2
•
•
G. Permitted Uses. In the R -1 District, no building or land shall be used and no
building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered unless otherwise provided
herein, except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Day care facilities (serving fourteen (14) or fewer persons }.
2. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary
for the health, safety and general welfare of the City.
3. Public parks.
4. Single family detached dwellings.
5. State licensed residential care facility serving six (6) or fewer persons.
6. Community Gardens operated by the city.
H. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following
are permitted accessory uses in the R -1 District:
1. Accessory apartments as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 9. of this
Ordinance.
2. Accessory buildings including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D of this Ordinance.
3. Fences, as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
4. Home occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this
Ordinance.
5. Non - commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred
(200) square feet in area.
6. Parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and
trucks.
7 Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or Tess in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -3
P62
P63
8. Parking of Rrecreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd. 1.P •
5.K. of this Ordinance.
9. Signs, as regulated by Appendix C Chapter 1010 of the City Code.
10. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the _ - - - - use of the residents of the
principal use and their guests- as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.D. This
does not include racing /riding courses for off -road vehicles.
I. Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -1 District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlined
in Section 2, Subd. 2 of this Ordinance.
1. Cemeteries provided that:
a. At minimum, the site accesses on a collector street.
b. Where abutting a rural or residential zoning district, the periphery of
the site shall be screened in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of
this Ordinance.
2. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs,
driving ranges, swimming pools, and similar facilities provided that:
a. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area of the site be covered
by buildings or structures.
c. When abutting a residential use and a residential use district, the
property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
d. The site must be accessed via a collector street or arterial street.
3. Day care facilities {ex-- serving more than fourteen (14) persons)
provided that:
a. Day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6-4
P64
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
4. Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi - public
recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers; limited to
nursery, elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious
institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque, and synagogues
provided that:
a. Side yards shall not be less than fifty (50) feet.
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is
provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on
Tots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the
principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from
surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section
3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
5. Home Occupation Level C as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
J. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed by administrative permit, as may be
approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Home Occupation Level B as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
3. Open Air Market accessory to an institutional use and limited in area to 25%
of the gross floor area of the principal building.
4. Transient Merchants.
K. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in the R -1 District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 2. of this
Ordinance.
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -5
P65
1
1
1
1
1
1
Subd. 2. R -1X, Single Family Executive Residential District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those
persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. This district
is intended for development of single family detached homes on Tots served with
public sewer and water. Land to be zoned R-1X shall be served with public sanitary
sewer and water; shall be in a Low Density Residential land use category according
to the comprehensive plan; and development density shall be consistent with that
land use category.
B. Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Lot Size. Twelve thousand eight hundred twenty -five (12,825)
square feet contiguous buildable land as defined by Section 1, Subd. 2.B of
this Ordinance.
2. Minimum Lot Width.
a. Interior Lots. Ninety (90) feet.
b. Corner Lots. One hundred fifteen (115) feet.
3. Minimum Lot Depth. One hundred thirty -five (135) feet.
a. Double Frontage Lots. One hundred forty -five (145) feet.
4. Building Setbacks. {The greater of the following:}
a. From Streets (Principal and Accessory Buildings).
1) Local Street. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (40) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
1) Principal Building. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
c. Side Yard.
1) Principal Building. Ten (10) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -6
•
•
5. Buffer. Any property adjacent to a collector or arterial street shall provide a
fifteen (15) foot buffer in accordance with Section 3.Subdivision 4.Q.
C. impervious Surface Coverage. The impervious surface of the property shall not
exceed forty percent (40 %).
Ma
lot area resulting in less than thirty fie (35) percent previous Landscaped area.
D. Building Requirements.
1. The minimum footprint, less garage area, for a single family dwelling unit
shall be one thousand forty (1040) square feet. The minim m floor area for
be as follows:
Rambler
1 1/2 Story
Split Foyer /Entry
Split Lo,rcl 3 level minimum
Two Story
1,260 square feat
1,092 square foot
1,248 square feet
1,248 square root
1,140 square 'Lot
2. All dwellings without basements in this district shall be required to provide an
additional one hundred (100) square feet of floor area to house utilities.
3. All dwellings shall have a double garage of a minimum six hundred (600)
square feet.
4. All dwellings shall comply with the Design and Construction Standards of
Section 3, Subd. 4.B.
E. Height Regulations. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed
thirty -five (35) feet in height.- except as allowed by Section 3, Subd. 4.C.
F. Sanitary Sewer. No R -1X subdivision creating a lot of less than ten (10) acres
shall be permitted in this district without public sanitary sewer and water.
G. Permitted Uses. In the R -1X District, no building or land shall be used and no
building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered unless otherwise provided
herein, except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Day care facilities serving fourteen (14) or fewer persons }.
2. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary
for the health, safety and general welfare of the City.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -7
P66
P67
3. Public parks.
4. Single family detached dwellings.
5. State licensed residential care facility serving six (6) or fewer persons.
6. Community Gardens operated by the city.
H. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following
are permitted accessory uses in the R -1X District:
1. Accessory apartments as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 109. of this
Ordinance.
2. Accessory buildings including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D of this Ordinance.
3. Fences, as regulated by Section 3, Subds. 4.R of this Ordinance.
4. Home occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this
Ordinance.
5. Non - commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred
(200) square feet in area.
6. Parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and
trucks.
7 Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd 15 of this Ordinance.
8. Parking of Rrecreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd. 'I.P
5.K. of this Ordinance.
9. Signs, as regulated by Append x CChapter 1010 of the City Code.
10. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the use of the residents of the
principal use and their guests- as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.D. This
does not include racing /riding courses for off -road vehicles.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -8
• I. Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -1X District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlined
in Section 2, Subd. 2 of this Ordinance.
1. Cemeteries provided that:
a. At minimum, the site accesses on a collector street.
b. Where abutting a rural or residential zoning district, the periphery of
the site shall be screened in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of
this Ordinance.
2. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs,
driving ranges, swimming pools, and similar facilities provided that:
a. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area of the site be covered
by buildings or structures.
c. When abutting a residential use and a residential use district, the
property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
d. The site must be accessed via a collector street or arterial street.
3. Day care facilities ( serving more than exceeding — fourteen (14) persons
provided that:
a. Day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
4. Public, Educational and Religious Buildings. Public or semi - public
recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers; limited to
nursery, elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious
institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque, and synagogues
provided that:
a. Side yards shall not be less than fifty (50) feet.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -9
P68
P69
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is
provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off- street parking and access is provided on the site or on
Tots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the
principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from
surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section
3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
5. Home Occupation Level C as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
J. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed by administrative permit, as may be
approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Home Occupation Level B as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
3. Open Air Market accessory to an institutional use and limited in area to 25%
of the gross floor area of the principal building.
Transient Merchants.
K. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in the R -1X District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 2. of this
Ordinance.
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -10
•
•
•
Subd. 3. Left blank intentionally
R EC, Single Family Estato Conservation District.
a.
amenities such as woodlands, wetlands, and significant views. The R EC District
intended for development of single family dctachod homes on lots sorved with public ✓owcr
and wa-tor.
District, tho following information shall bo submitted:
1. Resource inventory. An inventory of existing property resources (i.e., topography,
soil characteristics, vegctetion, etc.) ac required by Section 1003 1 2 of th- Subdivision
Ordinance.
width, as r cquired by Section 1003 1 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance.
3. onsorvation Preliminary Plat. A plat that roflects the densities of the yicld plan
prccekt;Latian ef--open space.
incorporating natural resources and open space, the following lot arca and width
Minimum Lot Area. Fifteen thousan
(15,000) quarc foot average buildable land *.
ietoo -ice- the- cubdivi: ion shall be equal to or grcator than fificcn thousand (15,000) square
foot in area.
percent of all individual lots in the subdivision shall bo ninety (90) foot or more in width, a
Age JO
80 feet, 30 foot, 35 feet, 90 feet, and 115 foet: -(80 +.0 +a5 +90 +115-450 feet, divide by
5-90 foot avorago lot width, with 30 percent of the lots (2 of 5) 90 feet or more in width).
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -11
Residential Districts
P70
P71
3. Setbacks. (The greater of the following:)
a. From Streets.
1) Local Street. Twenty five (25) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (10) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
1) Principal Building Thirty (30) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
c. Side. Yard.
1) Principal Building_ Ten (10) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
D.
Impervious Surface Coverage.
In no event shall off street parking
E. Building Standards.
spaoc,
1. Building Materials. No less than twenty (20) percent of the front building facade of
building that can be seen from the street shall meet this sale standard. Structures with
stone coverage to ten (10) percent.
2. Garage Size. A double shall be constructed as a part of any single family home.
3. Garage Frontage. From side building line to side building lino of any single family
Garage Location. No portion of any garage space may be more than five (5) feet
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -12
Residential Districts
•
•
•
5. Building Size.
" AM MIN Mit AK
Al
Al IA
Rambler 1,280 square feet
1 1/2 Story 1,092 square oct
Split Foyer /Entry 1,248 square feet
Split Level 3 level minimum 1,248 square feet
Two Story 1,040 square foot
IN AM
thirty five (35) feet
n height.
heroin, except for ono or more of the following uses:
1. Common opon spocc.
2. Day care facilities (fourteen (14) or fowcr persons).
alth, safety and general welfare of the City.
1. Public /priv�to parks.
5. Single family detached dwellings.
State liconcd residential care facility serving six (6) or fewer persons.
Community Gardens operated by the city.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -13
Residential Districts
P72
P73
ordinance
3. Fences, as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
�. Dome occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this Ordinance.
5. Non commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred (200)
7. Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dichcs, TVROs three (3) motors or,
less in diameter, short wave radio dispatching antennas, or those nccoscary for the
8. Recreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd. 4.P of this Ordinance.
3. Signs, as regulated by Appendix C of the City Code.
10. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are operated
for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests.
uces require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlined in
Section 2, Subd. 2 of this Ordinance.
1. Cemeteries provided that:
a. At minimum, the site accesses on a collector strc t.
b. Where abutting a rural or residential zoning district, the periphery of the site :hall be
-.CC '
-
2. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs, driving
a. The principal ruse, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the and arca of the site be covered by buildings or
structures.
c.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -14
Residential Districts
•
•
•
d. The site, must be accosse,d via a collector street or arterial street.
3. Day car: facilities (exceeding fourteen (1 1) persons) provided that:
Ordinance-
Minnesrota Department of Health and Human Services regulations, as may be amended.
�. Public, Educational or Religious Buildings. Public or semi public recreational
buildings and neighborhood or community centers; public and private educational
h
c.
Adegua
SUM
screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in
Adequate off street parking and access is provided on the situ or on lots directly
Ordinance.
Administrator:
a
AA
MI
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance_
Ordinance.
gross floor area of the principal building.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -15
Residential Districts
P74
P75
Transient Merchants.
1 Nonce
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -16
•
•
Subd. 4. R -2, Two Family Residential District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those
persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a suburban density. This district
is intended for development of single and two family detached homes on Tots served
with public sewer and water: no land shall be zoned R -2 unless the site is within the
MUSA and city sanitary sewer and city water are available. Land to be zoned R 2
buildable arca. Land to be zoned R -2 shall be served with public sanitary sewer and
water; shall be in a Low Density Residential or Medium Density Residential land use
category according to the comprehensive plan: and development density shall be
consistent with the land use category.
B. Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Lot Size. Lot size shall consist of contiguous buildable land as
defined by Section 1, Subd. 2.B.
a. Two Family.
1) Base Lots. Fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet.
2) Unit Lots. Seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet.
b. Single Family. Seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet.
2. Minimum Lot Width.
a. Two Family.
1) Base Lots. One hundred (100) feet.
2) Unit Lots. Fifty (50) feet.
b. Single Family.
1) Interior Lots. Sixty (60) Eighty (80) feet.
2) Corner Lots. Eighty (80)
feet.
3. Minimum Lot Depth. One hundredy twenty -five (135125) feet.
a. Double Frontage Lots. One hundred y thirty -five (445135) feet.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -17
Residential Districts
P76
P77
4. Building Setbacks. (The greatcr of the following:)
a. From Streets (Principal and Accessory Buildings).
1) Local Street. Thirty (30) Twenty -five (25) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (40) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
1) Principal Building. Thirty (30) Twenty -five (25) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
c. Side Yard.
1) Principal Building. Ten (10) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
d. Zero Lot Line. Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied
to a common wall of a two family dwelling unit.
5. Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line abuts a collector or arterial street a
fifteen (15) foot wide buffer shall be provided in accordance with Section
3.Subdivision 4.Q.
C. Impervious Surface Coverage Area. The impervious surface of the property
shall not exceed forty percent (40 %) in a Low Density Residential land use area, or
fifty percent (50 %) in a Medium Density Residential land use area. In no event shall
D. Building Design Standards.
1. Floor Area. The minimum floor footprint area, less garage area, for cinglc
shall be 850 square feet for single family dwellings and 800 square feet for
and two family dwelling units. measured using the outside building
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -18
Residential Districts
•
b.
3 Bedroom Rambler
2 Bedroom Rambler
1 1/2 Story
Split Foyer /Entry
Split Level 3 level minimum
Two Story
1,050 square feet
1,010 square feet
980 square feet
980 square feet
980 square feet
850 square feet
Two Family Dwellings. Eight hundred (800) square feet first floor
rJacdroom..
G2. All dwellings without basements in this district shall be required to provide an
additional one hundred (100) square feet of floor area to house utilities.
23. Garages. All single family dwellings shall have a double garage and shall
comply with the following:
a. Compliance with the Building Type and Construction Standards of
Section 3. Subdivison 4.B, and
b. All garages, except side or rear loaded garages, shall not protrude
forward of the front wall of the house, unless the house includes a
front porch that is unenclosed, a minimum of 8 feet in depth, and
extends across 100 percent of the front facade of the house. The
garage shall then not protrude forward of the front porch, and
c. If the garage door faces the street, the length of the garage wall
facing the street shall not be greater than fifty percent (50 %) of the
length of the entire front facade of the structure; except on houses
that comply with all of the following conditions:
1) The second floor living space extends over the two -car portion
of the garage; and
2) The garage doors are decorative and have a strip of windows;
and
3) Garages in excess of two stalls shall be broken up so the
additional stalls are recessed four feet from the main garage
facade; and
4) Garage width does not exceed 32 feet.
4 All two family dwellings shall comply with the Design and Construction
Sstandards of Section 3, Subd.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -19
P78
P79
E. Height Regulations. No two family dwelling shall hereafter be erected or
structurally altered to exceed thirty -five (35) feet in height.
F Sanitary Sewer. No R -2 subdivision creating a lot of Tess than ten (10) acres shall
be permitted in this district without public sanitary sewer and water.
G. Permitted Uses. In the R -2 District, no building or land shall be used and no
building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered unless otherwise provided
herein, except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Day care facilities serving sixteen (16) fourteen (1 1) or fewer persons }.
2. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary
for the health, safety, and general welfare of the City.
3. Public parks.
4. Single family detached dwellings.
5. State licensed residential care facility servisinge sixteen (16) or fewer
persons.
6. Two family dwellings.
7. Community Gardens operated by the city.
H. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the
following are permitted accessory uses in the R -2 District:
1. Accessory buildings including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D. of this Ordinance.
2. Accessory apartments within single family homes as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 10 9 of this Ordinance.
3. Fences per Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
4. Home occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this
Ordinance.
5. Non - commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred
(200) square feet in area.
6. Parking and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -20
•
P80
7 Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or Tess in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
8. Parking of Rrecreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd. 1.P.
5.K. of this Ordinance.
9. Signs as regulated by Appendix CChapter 1010 of the City Code.
10. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the use of the residents of the principal use and their guests - as
regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.D. This does not include racing /riding
courses for off -road vehicles.
Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -2 District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlines
in Section 2, Subd. 2 of this Ordinance.
• 1. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs,
driving ranges, swimming pools, and similar facilities provided that:
a. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area of the site be covered
by buildings or structures.
c. When abutting a residential use and a residential use district, the
property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
d. The site shall be accessed via a collector street or arterial street.
2. Day care facilities -ex _ foi ;- serving more than sixteen (4416)
persons} provided that:
a. Such day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water or has
adequate private sewer and water to protect the health and safety of
all persons who occupy the facility.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -21
P81
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
3. Manufactured home parks, provided they meet all requirements of Section 6,
Subd. 7. Planned unit development residential regulated by Section 2, Subd.
10 of this Ordinance.
4. Public, educational, and religious buildings, public or semi - public recreational
buildings and neighborhood or community centers limited to nursery,
elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious institutions
such as churches, chapels, temples, mosques, and synagogues provided
that:
a. Side yard setbacks shall not be Tess than fifty (50) feet.
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is
provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on
Tots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the
principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance
and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from
surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section
3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
5. Home Occupation Level C as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
J. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed by administrative permit, as may be
approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Home Occupation Level B as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
3. Open Air Market accessory to an institutional use and limited in area to
25% of the gross floor area of the principal building.
4. Transient Merchants.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -22
P82
• K. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in the R -2 District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 3 of this
Ordinance:
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -23
P83
Subd. 5. R -3, Medium Density Residential District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide setting for multiple family structures of
up to eight (8) dwelling units per building in areas that have good thoroughfare
access, have proper relationship to other uses, and are accessible to major activity
centers, recreation areas and shopping areas. No land shall be zoned R 3 unless
Land to be zoned R -3 shall be served with public sanitary sewer and water; shall be
in a Medium Density Residential land use category according to the comprehensive
plan; and development density shall be consistent with that and use category.
B. Processing. Full compliance with this section, other applicable provisions of thin
principal structure and /or ux. Subdivision and administrative review requirements,
an R 3 District shall be within a range of throe (3) to six (6) units per net acre and
-DB. Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Lot Size. Lot size shall consist of contiguous buildable land as
defined by Section 1, Subd. 2.B.
a. Base Lots.
1) Two Family Dwellings. Fourteen thousand (14,000) square
feet.
2) Townhomes /Quadraminium and Other Multiple Family
Dwellings. Twenty four thousand (24,000) square feet.
b. Unit Lot.
The minimum unit lot requirements for two family
2. Minimum Lot Width.
a. Base Lots. One hundred (100) feet.
b. Unit Lot. Twenty four (24) foot.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -24
Residential Districts
•
3. Minimum Lot Depth. There is no minimum lot depth in the R -3 zoning
district.
311. Building Setbacks. (The greater of the following:)
a. From Streets (Principal and Accessory Buildings).
1) Residential Street. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (40) feet.
3) Parking Lot from street. Fifteen (15) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
1) Principal Building. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
3) Parking Lot. Five (5) feet.
c. Side Yard.
1) Principal Building. Ten (10) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
3) Parking Lot. Five (5) feet.
d. Zero Lot Line. Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied to
a common wall of multi- family a two family dwelling units.
e. From Low Density Residential. Principal buildings shall be a
minimum of thirty -five (35) feet from any land guided for low density
residential.
5. Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line abuts land guided for low density
residential, a collector street, or an arterial street a twenty (20) foot wide
buffer shall be provided in accordance with Section 3.Subdivision 4.Q.
C. Impervious Surface Coverage Area. The impervious surface of the property shall
not exceed fifty percent (50 %) in a Medium Density Residential and use area. or
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -25
P84
P85
sixty -five percent (65 %) in a High Density Residential land use area. In no event
shall off street parking space, structures of any type, buildings, or other features
the height of thirty eix (36) feet in height .
GD. Building Design Standards.
1. Floor Area. The minimum livable floor area for each multiple family dwelling
unit shall be seven hundred (700) square feet plus seventy (70) one hundred
(404)-additional square feet for each bedroom.
Efficiency Unit
Onc Bedroom Unit
Two Bedroom Unit
Three Bedroom Unit
Four Bedroom Unit
690 squarc feet
800 square feet
920 square feet
1,010 square feet
1,160 square fect
hundred fifty (150) square feet per unit.
2. Utility Area. Dwellings with dedicated individual access shall be required to
provide an additional one hundred (100) square feet of floor area to house
utilities, unless a basement is present. Dwellings with shared access shall
be required to provide adequate floor area within the building to house
utilities.
3. All dwelling units shall have parking provided in accordance with Section 3.
Subdivision 5.F
4. All two family dwellings, townhomes, and multiple family dwellings shall
comply with the Design and Construction Standardsreguirements of Section
3, Subd. 4.B.2 and '{ .B.3.
3. Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line in an R 3 District abuts an R, R X, R 1,
R 1X, R EC, or R 2 District, or public road right of way, a landscape buffer
E. Height Regulations. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed
the height of the greater of three stories or thirty -six (36) feet in height except as
allowed by Section 3, Subd. 4.C.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -26
Residential Districts
•
•
F. Sanitary Sewer. No R -3 subdivision creating a lot of less than ten (10) acres shall
be permitted in this district without public sanitary sewer and water.
4G. Permitted Uses. In the R -3 District, no building or land shall be used and no
building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered unless otherwise provided
herein, except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Day care facilities {serving sixteen (16) or fewer persons }.
2. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary
for the health, safety and general welfare of the City.
3. Multiple dwellings containing eight (8) units or less.
4. Public parks.
5. State licensed residential care facility serving sixteen (16) or fewer persons.
6. Townhomes and quadraminiums.
7. Two family dwellings.
8. Community Gardens operated by the city.
4-H. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following
are permitted accessory uses in the R -3 District:
1. Accessory buildings including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D. of this Ordinance.
2. Fences per Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
3. Home occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this
Ordinance.
4. Non - commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred
(200) square feet in area.
5. Parking and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks.
6. Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -27
P86
P87
7. Parking of Rrecreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd. 1.P
5.K. of this Ordinance.
8. Signs as regulated by end-ix 0 Chapter 1010 of the City Code.
9. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the use of the residents of the principal use and their guests - as
regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.D. This does not include racing /riding
courses for off -road vehicles.
fI. Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -3 District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based upon the criteria and procedures
outlined in Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance.
1. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs,
driving ranges, swimming pools, and similar facilities provided that:
a. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area of the site be covered
by buildings or structures.
c. When abutting a residential use and a residential use district, the
property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
d. The site shall be accessed via a collector street or arterial street.
2. Day care facilities {exceedingservinq more than sixteen (16) persons}
provided that:
a. Such day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water or has
adequate private sewer and water to protect the health and safety of
all persons who occupy the facility.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -28
•
•
•
3. Manufactured home parks, provided they meet all requirements of Section 6,
Subd. 7. Planned unit dovo!opmcnt rccidcntial regulated by Section 2, Subd.
10 of thi-s Ordinance..
43. Public, educational and religious buildings, public or semi-public recreational
buildings and neighborhood or community centers limited to nursery,
elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious institutions
such as churches, chapels, temples, mosques, and synagogues provided
that:
a. Side yard setbacks shall not be Tess than fifty (50) feet.
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is
provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on
Tots directly abutting or directly across a public street or alley to the
principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from
surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section
3. Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
51. Home Occupation Level C as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
1 -KJ. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed by administrative permit, as may be
approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Home Occupation Level B as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
3. Open Air Market accessory to an institutional use and limited in area to 25%
of the gross floor area of the principal building.
4. Transient Merchants.
t K. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in the R -3 District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 3 of this
Ordinance.
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -29
Residential Districts
P88
P89
Subd. 6. R -4, High Density Residential District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide setting for multiple family housing in
areas that have good thoroughfare access, have proper relationship to other uses,
and are accessible to major activity centers, recreation areas and shopping areas.
sewer and city water are available. Land to be zoned R -4 shall be served with
public sanitary sewer and water; shall be in a High Density Residential land use
category according to the comprehensive plan; and development density shall be
consistent with that land use category.
B. Processing. Full compliance with this section, other applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, and the City's Subdivision Ordinance provides an alternative to the
-DB. Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Lot Size. Lot size shall consist of contiguous buildable land as
defined by Section 1, Subd. 2.B.
a. Base Lots.
1) Two Family. Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet.
2) Townhome /Quadraminium and Other Multiple Family
Dwellings. Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet.
b. Unit Lot. The minimum unit lot requirements for two family
dwellings, townhomes, and quad-ram+niums shall by the minimum
2. Minimum Lot Width.
a. Base Lots. One hundred (100) feet.
b. Unit Lot. Twenty four (24) fact.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -30
Residential Districts
•
•
•
3. Minimum Lot Depth. There is no minimum lot depth in the R -4 zoning
district.
44. Building Setbacks. (The grcater of the following:)
a. From Streets.
1) Residential Street. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Collector or Arterial Street. Forty (40) feet.
3) Parking Lot From Street. Fifteen (15) feet.
b. Rear Yard.
1) Principal Building. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
3) Parking Lot. Five (5) feet.
c. Side Yard.
1) Principal Building. Twenty (20) feet.
2) Accessory Building. Five (5) feet.
3) Parking Lot. Five (5) feet.
d. Zero Lot Line. Side yard setback requirements shall not be applied
to a common wall of multi- family a two family dwelling units.
e. From Low Density Residential District. Principal buildings shall be a
minimum of thirty -five (35) feet from any and guided for low density
residential.
5. Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line abuts land guided for low density
residential, a collector street, or an arterial street a fifteen (20) foot wide
buffer shall be provided in accordance with Section 3.Subdivision 4.Q.
G. Impervious Surface Coverage Area. The impervious surface of the property shall
not exceed sixty -five percent (65 %). In no event shall off street parking race,
porcent of the lot area resulting in
ess than thirty five (35) percent pervious
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -31
Residential Districts
P90
P91
GD. Building Design Standards.
1. Floor Area. The minimum livable floor area for each multiple family dwelling
unit shall be seven hundred (700) square feet plus seventy (70)one-4u-14d-red
(4-D9) additional square feet for each bedroom.
2. Utility Area. Dwellings with dedicated individual access shall be required to
provide an additional one hundred (100) square feet of floor area to house
utilities, unless a basement is present. Dwellings with shared access shall
be required to provide adequate floor area within the building to house
utilities.
3. All dwellings shall provide parking in accordance with Section 3. Subdivison
5.K.
4. All two family dwellings, townhomcs and multiple family dwellings shall
comply with the Design and Construction Standards requirements of Section
3, Subd. 4.B.2 and ^ Q
3. Buffer. Where a sidc or rear lot lino in an R District abuts an R, R X, R 1,
arca not Icss than twenty (20) feet in depth shall be provided along such tide
E. Height Regulation. No building shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed
forty -five (45) feet in height —or, for a multiple dwelling building, the greater of four
(4) stories or forty -five (45) feet — except as allowed by Section 3, Subd. 4.C.
F Sanitary Sewer. No R-4 subdivision creating a lot Tess than ten (10) acres shall be
permitted in this district without public sanitary sewer and water.
#G. Permitted Uses. In the R -4 District, no building or land shall be used and no
building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered unless otherwise provided
herein, except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Day care facilities kserving sixteen (16) or fewer persons.
2. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary
for the health, safety and general welfare of the City.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -32
•
3. Multiple family dwellings.
4. Public parks.
5. State licensed residential care facility serving sixteen (16) or fewer persons.
6. Townhomes and quadraminiums.
7. Two family dwellings.
8. Community Gardens operated by the city.
1-H. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following
are permitted accessory uses in the R -4 District:
1. Accessory buildings including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D. of this Ordinance.
2. Fences per Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
3. Home occupation Level A as regulated by Section 3, Subd. 8 of this
Ordinance.
4. Non - commercial greenhouses provided they do not exceed two hundred
(200) square feet in area.
5. Parking and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks.
6. Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
7 Parking of Rrecreational vehicles and equipment per Section 3, Subd.-4-
5.K. of this Ordinance.
8. Signs as regulated by ��Chapter 1010 of the City Code.
9. Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the use of the residents of the principal use and their guests - as
regulated by Section 3, Subd. 4.D. This does not include racing /riding
courses for off-road vehicles.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -33
P92
P93
1 4l. Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -4 District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based upon the criteria and procedures
outlined in Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance.
1. Clinics, hospitals and nursing homes provided that:
a. Side yards are double the minimum requirements established for this
district and are screened in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of
this Ordinance.
b. Only the rear yard shall be used for play or recreational areas. Said
area shall be fenced and controlled and screened in compliance with
Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. The site shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient
capacity to accommodate traffic which will be generated.
All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be
in compliance with Appendix C of the City Code.
e. All State Statutes and regulations governing such use are strictly
adhered to and all required operating permits are secured.
f Adequate off - street parking is provided in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance.
g.
Adequate off - street loading space is provided in compliance with
Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance.
2. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses, country clubs,
driving ranges, swimming pools, and similar facilities provided that:
a. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character.
b. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area of the site be covered
by buildings or structures.
c. When abutting a residential use and a residential use district, the
property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
d. The site shall be accessed via a collector street or arterial street.
3. Day care facilities (exce s- serving more than sixteen (16) persons
provided that:
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -34
•
•
•
a. Such day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water or has
adequate private sewer and water to protect the health and safety of
all persons who occupy the facility.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
4. Funeral homes and mortuaries provided that:
a. The site and related parking and service entrances are served by an
arterial or collector street or sufficient capacity to accommodate the
traffic which will be generated.
b. Adequate off - street parking is provided in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off- street loading is provided in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 6. of this Ordinance.
d. Vehicular entrances to parking or service areas shall create a
minimum of conflict with through traffic movement.
e. When abutting residential zoning districts, a buffer area with
screening and landscaping in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of
this Ordinance shall be provided.
f. All signing and information or visual communications devices shall be
in compliance with Appendix C of the City Code.
5. Manufactured home parks. provided they meet all requirements of Section 6,
Subd. 7.
Multiple. family dwellings gr- atcr than four (Ii) stories or forty five (A.-5) feet in
a. The architectural appearance of the building shall not bo o dissimilar
to the. cxi °ting neighboring btuildings as to ca se. innpairrr,onts in
distance of the lot.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -35
Residential Districts
P94
P95
calculated by the Building Code, which is above the maximum
c. The construction does not limit solar acce,c to abutting and /or
6. Planned unit development residcntial regulated by Section 2, Subd. 10 of
this Ordinance.
76. Public, educational and religious buildings, public or semi - public recreational
buildings and neighborhood or community centers limited to nursery,
elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious institutions
such as churches, chapels, temples, mosques, and synagogues provided
that:
a. Side yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet.
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is
provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on
Tots directly abutting or directly across a public street or alley to the
principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from
surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section
3. Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
47. Home Occupation Level C as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
1 4J. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed in the R -4 District by administrative
permit, as may be approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Home Occupation Level B as regulated by Section 3, Subdivision 8 of this
Ordinance.
3. Open Air Market accessory to an institutional use and limited in area to 25%
of the gross floor area of the principal building.
4. Transient Merchants.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -36
•
LK. interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in ' the R -4 District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 3 of this
Ordinance.
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -37
P96
P97
Subd. 7. R -6, Manufactured Home Park District.
A. Purpose. This district is intended to provide opportunities whereby manufactured
housing may be located on a leased or rented site in a planned community. This
district is intended to provide opportunities for almost all types of manufactured
homes including those which may not be able to meet the design standards
established in other residential districts. All manufactured home parks are required
to conform to the provisions of this section and other appropriate sections of this
Ordinance. Land to be zoned R -6 and any new manufactured home park shall be
served with public sanitary sewer and water: and the density of the park shall be
consistent with the land use category according to the Comprehensive Plan. Na
new land shall be zoned R 6, Manufactured Home Park District unless the sito or
arca IL. within the City's MUSA and sanitary sewer and municipal wato -is
available.
B. Lot and Yard Requirements.
1. Minimum Park Size. Five (5) acres.
2. Minimum Lot or Site Size. Six thousand (6,000) square feet per unit
exclusive of roadways, walkways or other property used for park purposes.
3. Minimum Lot or Site Width. Sixty (60) feet measured at right angles to its
side lines.
4. Setbacks. (The greater of the following:)
a. From Public Streets.
1) Local Street. Thirty (30) feet.
2) Collector Street. Forty (40) feet.
b. Front Yard.
1) Private Park Street. Twenty (20) feet.
2) Common Park Walk. Ten (10) feet.
c. Rear Yard. Ten (10) feet.
d. Side Yard. Ten (10) feet. Side yard setback for interior lot lines may
be reduced to zero, if it is part of an overall park plan to maximize
private yard space for each unit. This zero side yard setback
allowance will only be permitted if the distance to the manufactured
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -38
•
home that shares that side lot line is at least thirty (30) feet in
distance.
e. There shall not be less than twenty (20) feet of space between
manufactured homes in all directions.
f. From Low Density Residential. Principal buildings shall be a minimum
of thirty -five (35) feet from any and guided for low density residential.
R R X R1 R 1X R EC R 2 R 3 R Zonin• Districts. Thirty (30)
feet,
5. Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line abuts land guided for low density
residential, a collector street, or an arterial street a twenty (20) foot wide
buffer shall be provided in accordance with Section 3.Subdivision 4.Q.
C. Park Requirements.
1. Skirt. All manufactured homes shall have skirts around the entire unit made
of metal, plastic, fiberglass or comparable, non - combustible material
approved by the Building Official and shall be finished to be harmonious with
the manufactured home so that it will enhance the general appearance
thereof.
2. Parking. The parking of more than one (1) manufactured home on any
single lot shall not be permitted.
3. Fire Protection. Fire protection shall be in accordance with Minnesota
Health Department Rule 187 Fire Protection Regulations. Each occupied
manufactured home shall be equipped with a Fire Marshal approved type
extinguisher in usable condition. The occupant of a manufactured home
shall be responsible for providing such extinguisher.
4. Support and Tie Down Systems. The Minnesota Department of
Administration Building Code Division Rules for Manufactured Home Support
and Tie Down Systems, authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 327.31 to
327.34, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this Ordinance
as if fully set forth herein. All new and relocated manufactured homes shall
be equipped with an anchoring and support system as defined and approved
by state rules.
5. Construction Material Storage. All construction materials not currently in use
for construction shall be stored indoors, or totally screened from the eye level
view from public streets and adjacent properties.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -39
P98
P99
6. Drainage. Every manufactured home park shall be located on a well
drained area and the premises shall be properly graded so as to prevent the
accumulation of storm or other waters.
7. Common Walks. Where deemed necessary, common walks shall be
provided. Such walks shall be a minimum width of three (3) feet.
8. Individual Walks. All manufactured homes shall be connected to common
walks, to paved streets, or to paved driveways or parking spaces connecting
to a paved street. Such individual walks shall have a minimum width of two
(2) feet.
9. Patio. A patio may be constructed on the ground beside each manufactured
home parking space; this patio shall be not greater than one hundred fifty
(150) square feet in area and constructed of concrete with a minimum
thickness of four (4) inches or approved equal.
10. Shade Tree. At least one (1) shade tree (minimum diameter two (2) inches
at time of planting) shall be placed and maintained on each site or lot.
11. Landscaping. Except for the areas used for the manufactured home, patio,
walkways and off - street parking space, the entire site or lot shall be sodded,
seeded or adequately landscaped.
12. Screening. Whcre a manufacturcd home park site abuts upon a R, R X, R
4312. Street Access. Each unit shall abut on and have access to a street. This
street shall be constructed according to standards approved by the City.
4413. Curbing. A concrete curb and gutter shall be constructed on each side of
the street and the face of its curb shall be at least fifteen (15) feet from the
centerline of said street; the design shall be of a type approved by the City.
4514. Speed Limit. Speed limit signs shall be clearly posted throughout the
manufactured home park. Ten (10) miles per hour shall be the maximum
speed posted.
1615. Parking.
a. Each manufactured home site shall have off - street parking space
paved with concrete and /or bituminous for two (2) automobiles.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6-40
•
•
1
i
•
1
1
b. Each manufactured home park shall maintain a hard surfaced off -
street parking lot for guests of occupants of at least one (1) space for
each five (5) manufactured home lots.
c. Access drives off roads to all parking spaces and manufactured home
lots shall be surfaced with concrete or bituminous according to
specifications established by the City.
d. There shall be a separate area of storage provided for boats, boat
trailers, travel trailers, etc. The area shall be located away from any
public road and shall be fenced and screened from view of public road
and adjacent properties.
1716. Utilities.
a. All manufactured homes shall be served by a central water and
sanitary sewer system.
b. All utilities shall be underground. There shall be no overhead wires or
supporting poles except those essential for street or other lighting
purposes.
c. Access in the skirting shall be provided to allow the inspection of
plumbing, electrical facilities and related manufactured home
equipment.
d. Water facilities, sewage disposal and street lighting shall be installed
and maintained by the owner of the manufactured home park and
shall meet all appropriate standards established by the City.
117. Street Lighting. The park shall have a street lighting plan approved by the
City.
1918. Accessory Buildings. Any accessory building for outside storage of
equipment or refuse shall be constructed of weather resistant material and
be finished in a manner conforming with the appearance of the principal
dwelling and shall be consistent in appearance with the other accessory
buildings in the manufactured home park.
2 -919. Community Building. All manufactured home parks may have a central
community building with laundry drying areas and washing machines.
2120. Emergency Storm Protections. Manufactured home parks established prior
to 1 July 1993 shall comply with emergency room protections as required by
Minnesota Statutes. A new manufactured home park established after 1 July
1993 shall have storm shelters in compliance with Minnesota Statutes.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -41
P100
P101
1
Additionally, all emergency storm protection measures shall be subject to the
approval of the City Council.
2221. Recreational Space. All manufactured home parks shall have at least ten
(10) percent of the land area developed for recreational use (sport courts,
children's play equipment, swimming pool, golf green, etc.) developed and
maintained at the owner's expense.
2322. Refuse Handling. The handling of refuse shall be in compliance with the
applicable provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.GE of this Ordinance. The refuse
handling shall be allowed provided such equipment is screened from
adjacent uses, and all public and private street rights -of -way.
D. Permitted Uses. In the R -6 District, unless otherwise provided in this Ordinance,
no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected or structurally
altered except for one or more of the following uses:
1. Community /recreation buildings.
2. Manufactured homes.
3. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15. of this Ordinance.
4. Community Gardens operated by the city.
Day care facilities serving fourteen (14) or fewer persons.
6. State licensed residential care facility serving six (6) or fewer persons.
E. Accessory Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following
are permitted accessory uses in the R -6 District:
1. Accessory buildings, including garages, tool houses, sheds and similar
buildings for storage of domestic supplies and equipment, as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 4.D. of this Ordinance.
2. Civil defense buildings /storm shelters.
3. Community laundry facilities, park office, recreational building(s) provided
such structures are of a permanent nature and comply with the provisions of
the State Building Code.
4. Fences per Section 3, Subd. 4.R of this Ordinance.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6-42
•
5. Radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three (3)
meters or Tess in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers,
ham radio transmitters and television receivers as regulated by Section 3,
Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
6. Signs as regulated by Appendix C Chapter 1010 of the City Code.
7 Swimming pools, sport courts, and other recreational facilities which are
operated for the use of the residents of the principal use and their guests - as
regulated by Section 3. Subd. 4.D. This does not include racing /riding
courses for off -road vehicles.
F Conditional Uses. The following are conditional uses in the R -6 District: These
uses require a conditional use permit based on the criteria and procedures outlined
in Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance.
1. Vie-
Day care facilities serving more than fourteen (14) persons provided that:
a. Day care facility has access to municipal sewer and water.
b. Screening is provided along shared property boundaries. Such
required fencing and screening shall comply with the applicable
provisions of Section 3. Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
c. All day care facility operations comply with the minimum requirements
of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services
regulations, as may be amended.
G. Uses by Administrative Permit. Subject to applicable provisions of this
Ordinance, the following uses are allowed in the R -6 District by administrative
permit, as may be approved by the Zoning Administrator:
1. Personal wireless service antennas as secondary uses as regulated by
Section 3, Subd. 15 of this Ordinance.
2. Transient Merchants.
H. Interim Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of this Ordinance, the following are
interim uses in the R -6 District and governed by Section 2, Subd. 3. of this
Ordinance.
1. None.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -43
P102
P103
I. Review and Approval Procedures. No person shall establish, develop, extend or
enlarge a manufactured home park within the City of Lino Lakes without first
obtaining site plan approval from the City Council with review by the Planning and
Zoning Board. Approval shall be granted only upon compliance with all of the
following:
1. Planning and Zoning Board Review. The Planning and Zoning Board shall
review all applications for manufactured home parks and shall hold
public hearings as deemed necessary or proper. The findings and
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board shall be forwarded to
the City Council for action.
2. Approval or Denial. The City Council shall consider and act on the
application for cite plan approval. Approval shall be granted only upon
compliance with all of the procedures and requirements established in this
cction ordinance.
3. Submission Requirements. Submission for manufactured home park
approval shall include the following:
a. All submittal requirements for a zoning amendment and /or conditional
use permit, as appropriate, required by Section 2. If the site is to be
subdivided, the submittal also must comply with the requirements of
Chapter 1001 of the City Code.
1) The extent and area proposed for manufactured home park
purposes.
2) Locations for roads and driveways.
3) Location of cites or lots for manufactured homes.
.1) Proposed disposition of surface drainage.
eze -e
6) Off strcct parking.
7) Patios.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Residential Districts
6 -44
•
•
b.
10) Location of sidewalks.
11) Location of setback linos.
OIL
13) Any other information red6osted by the City Council.
Proof of Agency Review. The applicant shall provide proof that the
plans submitted have been approved by the State of Minnesota
Department of Health, and have satisfied all other federal, state,
county, city and watershed district laws and regulations.
1. Compliance with Ordinance. The Building Official is hereby authorized and
diroct d to make rAch inrpoction; as are n000ssaTy to determine satisfactory
51. Access. It shall be the duty of the park owner to give the Building Inspector
free access to all Tots at reasonable times for the purposes of inspection.
Building Official.
1. Installation Permit. Nc manufactured home shall be installed without having
Building Official.
roguircmcnts.
1. Fees. Foos for inspection shall be set by the City Council.
Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance
6 -45
Residential Districts
P104
P105
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -16
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 03 -12 FOR PUBLICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the first and second reading of Ordinance
No. 03 -12, amending Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Residential Zoning
Distircts; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3 -12 is lengthy and MN Statute 412.191 provides for a city
to publish a summary of an ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the summary clearly informs the public of
the intent and effect of the ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the publication in the official newspaper will include a notice that a full
printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council approves the summary
in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February 2012.
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
P106
ATTACHMENT A, RESOLUTION 12 -16
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 03 -12
AN ORDINANCE amending the Zoning Ordinance section regulating Residential
Zoning Districts
The purpose of amending this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to clarify the
regulations regarding the development of land within the residential zoning districts of
the city.
Section 6.Subdivision 1
Section 6.Subdivision 2
Section 6.Subdivision 3
Section 6.Subdivision 4 —
Section 6.Subdivision 5 —
Section 6.Subdivision 6 —
Section 6.Subdivision 7 —
— R -1, Single Family Residential District
— R -1X, Single Family Executive Residential District
— Left Blank Intentionally
R -2, Two Family Residential District
R -3, Medium Density Residential District
R -4, High Density Residential District
R -6, Manufactured Home Park District
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council on February 27th , 2012.
This is a summary of the adopted ordinance. A full printed copy of the ordinance is
available at City Hall.
•
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jason C. Wedel, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 12 -20 Revoking Municipal State Aid Street
Designations (MSAS 119 and MSAS 121)
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION
The City of Lino Lakes has a population over 5,000 and therefore qualifies to be a part of the
Municipal State Aid System (MSAS). As a State Aid City, up to 20% of the City's municipal
mileage is allowed to be designated as State Aid. The City receives funding, based on the amount
of designated mileage, from the State that can be used to fund the reconstruction of the MSAS
designated streets.
BACKGROUND
In years past, the total amount of streets within the City was maintained utilizing an older Computer
Aided Drafting (CAD) based drawing. This drawing was created over a decade ago and each year
new street segments were simply added to it. This winter we reviewed the City's total mileage
utilizing our Geographic Information System (GIS) database. After reviewing the GIS data, it was
determined that the mileage previously certified within the City was greater than what actually
existed. In correcting the certified mileage we also determined that the City has designated more
than 20% of the allowed mileage as MSAS. Per the Certification of Mileage that was completed in
2011, the City has designated 0.44 miles more than is allowed by State Aid rules.
Staff met with Marshall Johnston of the Mn/DOT State Aid unit on January 10, 2012 to discuss this
discrepancy. Upon review of the Lino Lakes system, Mr. Johnston was in agreement with Staff's
findings of having designated more mileage than was allowed. Mr. Johnston indicated that the City
must come back into compliance with the maximum 20% mileage designation rule.
To correct this over - designation, the City must revoke 0.44 miles, at minimum, to come back into
compliance with State Aid rules. Upon reviewing the system, two non - existing segments were
identified to be removed. The segments include Rehbeins Street and 73rd Street Extension; both
segments are between CSAH 21 and 21st Avenue. Between the two segments, the lengths total 0.52
miles. Revoking these two segments will bring the City back into compliance with State Aid rules
and will leave the City with an additional 0.08 miles that could be designated in the future.
P107
P108
In 2012, the City received $13,000 in apportionment dollars for these two non - existing segments.
Staff discussions with State Aid indicated that the City would not receive a penalty or be required to
pay back any funds that were received as a result of the prior over - designation.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution 12 -20, Revoking Municipal State Aid Street Designations (MSAS 119 and
MSAS 121).
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution Number 12 -20
•
•
•
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -20
A RESOLUTION REVOKING NON - EXISTING REHBEINS STREET
AND NON - EXISTING 73RD STREET EXTENSION
FROM THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID SYSTEM
FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, as a requisite to qualify for State Aid funding for streets, it is necessary that
the City Council designate certain streets within the City of Lino Lakes to comprise a
Municipal State Aid Street system; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendations of the City Engineer and
has approved certain streets within the City to become a part of said system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. That non - existing Rehbeins Street from CSAH 21 to 21st Avenue shall be revoked
from the City of Lino Lakes MSAS system.
2. That non - existing 73rd Street Extension from CSAH 21 to 21st Avenue shall be
revoked from the City of Lino Lakes MSAS system.
3. That the City Clerk provide a certified copy of this resolution for transmittal to the
Commissioner of the Department of Transportation.
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 27th day of February, 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
P109
P110
•
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 12 -21,
Declare Intent to Bond. 2012 Intersection Signal
Improvements
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION:
The installation of traffic signals and associated improvements to the Lake/Main and Birch/Ware
street intersections is planned to commence in summer of 2012. The Internal Revenue Code
requires cities to declare their intent to reimburse project costs from bond proceeds prior to
encumbering project costs. This is a non - binding declaration that must take place in order to
finance projects in this manner.
• BACKGROUND:
In November of 2010 City residents approved the ballot question supporting these improvements.
The estimated total project cost is approximately $2,593,000. Funding for the project is being
shared by the City of Lino Lakes, and the County of Anoka. The City's estimated share of the
project, $1,840,000, will be financed by bond proceeds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 12 -21.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 12 -21
•
P111
Council Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 12-21
DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE
CITY OF LINO LAKES TO REIMBURSE
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS
OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. § 1.150 -2 (the
"Reimbursement Regulations ") providing that proceeds of tax- exempt bonds used to reimburse
prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; and
WHEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures that may be financed temporarily
from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of a tax- exempt bond;
WHEREAS, the City has determined to make this declaration of official intent
( "Declaration ") to reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the
Reimbursement Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City proposes to undertake improvements to the certain street
intersections within the City (the "Project ").
2. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain
costs of the Project from the proceeds of bonds in an estimated maximum principal amount
of $1,840,000. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance
of the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150- 2(d)(3)
of the Reimbursement Regulations.
3. This Declaration has been made not later than 60 days after payment of any
original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of
bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of bonds; (b) costs in an
amount not in excess of $100,000 or 5 percent of the proceeds of an issue; or (c) "preliminary
expenditures" up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate issue price of the issue
or issues that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the
preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term "preliminary expenditures" includes
architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to
commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land
acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction.
•
•
•
•
•
•
4. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based
on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The anticipated original
expenditures for the Project and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph 2 are
consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds
of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a
long -term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City's budget or financial policies to pay
such Project expenditures.
5. This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for
purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations.
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
Attest:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
P112
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
MEETING DATE: February 27, 2012
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 12 -22, Authorizing
Execution of Appraisal Services Contract, Otter
Lake Road Extension Improvement Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
INTRODUCTION:
Staff is requesting authorization to enter into a professional services contract with BRWK
Appraisals Inc. as part of the Otter Lake Road extension improvement project. BRWK has
submitted a proposal to prepare Right of Way acquisition appraisals for two parcels and a Special
Benefit appraisal report evaluating the proposed special assessments. The total proposed fee is
$9,400.
411/ BACKGROUND:
On January 9, 2012 the City Council received the feasibility report for the Otter Lake Road
Extension prepared by TKDA, the City's engineering consultant. The council held a public
hearing on the proposed improvements on February 13, 2012. Public testimony was received at
the hearing from the two property owners proposed to be assessed as well as surrounding
property owners. The council closed the hearing and scheduled discussion for the February 27,
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 12 -22.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 12 -22
•
P113
P114
Council Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -22
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
BRWK APPRAISALS INC
OTTER LAKE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a feasibility study regarding the improvement of Otter Lake
Road north of Main Street; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing for the improvements on Februrary 13, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has requested additional information regarding land costs and the
review of the special benefit associated with said improvements prior to ordering the
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. That staff is hereby authorized to enter a contract with BRWK Appraisals, Inc. in the amount
of $9,400 for appraisal services related to the Otter Lake Road Extension improvement
project.
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
Attest:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of February, 2012.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.