Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/10/2005 Council Packet
• • AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, January 10, 2005 Council Chambers City Council meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) - Open Mike Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance - Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: January 10, 2005 (Check No. 72751 through 72890 in the amount of $405,705.39). Pg. 3 -14 ii) Centennial Fire District Check Register B) Consider approval of December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting Minutes C) Consider approval of December 15, 2004 Council Work Session Minutes D) Consider approval of December 20, 2004 City Council Meeting Minutes 2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) None. 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) First Meeting of the Year Appointments Pg. 15 -17 B) Consider Conditional Offer of Employment for Utility Maintenance Position (information will follow Friday if the process allows) Pg. 18A - C) Approval of 2005 Council Meeting Schedule Pg. 19 -20 Page 1 • e AGENDA 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) None. 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None. 6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Fox Den Acres, Jeff Smyser Pg. 21 -55 i. First Reading, Ordinance 26 -04, Rezone to Planned Unit Development ii. Resolution 04 -196, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat B) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -01, Preliminary Plat, Vaughan Addition, Paul Bengtson Pg. 56 -80 C) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing Soil Borings, Well No. 5, Jim Studenski Pg. 81 -84 D) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -201, Modifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11, Michael Grochala Pg. 85 -114 7. Unfinished Business A) None. 8. New Business A) None. 9. Community Calendar, January 11, 2005 through January 24, 2005: A) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 6:30 p.m. B) Charter Commission Meeting, Thursday, January 13, 2005, 7:00 p.m. C) Council Work Session, Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 5:30 p.m. C) City Council Meeting, Monday, January 24, 2005, 6:30 p.m. 10. Adjourn Page 2 EXPANDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, January 10, 2005 Council Chambers City Council meeting 6:30 p.m. (6:34 P.M.) (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) - Open Mike - Call to Order and Roll Call ALL PRESENT. Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items THERE WERE NO CHANGES TO THE AGENDA. 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) January 10, 2005 (Check No. 72751 through 72890 in the amount of $405,705.39). Pg. 3 -14 B) Consider approval of December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting Minutes C) Consider approval of December 15, 2004 Council Work Session Minutes D) Consider approval of December 20, 2004 City Council Meeting Minutes COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON REQUESTED A CORRECTION TO HER COMMENTS IN THE DECEMBER 20, 2004 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AT PAGE 5, LINE 216. THE COUNCIL CONCURRED TO ADD THIS CORRECTION. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, APPROVING THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE CORRECTION TO ITEM 1D AS STATED. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) None. Page 1 EXPANDED AGENDA 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) First Meeting of the Year Appointments Pg. 15 -17 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, APPROVING THE LIST OF APPOINTMENTS AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B) Consider Conditional Offer of Employment for Utility Maintenance Position Pg. 18A— MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT TO JEFF FROST AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C) Approval of 2005 Council Meeting Schedule Pg. 19 -20 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, APPROVING THE 2005 COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2005 WORK SESSION MEETING DATE (THE NIGHT BEFORE THANKSGIVING) AND MAY ADJUST THIS DATE AT A FUTURE MEETING. D) Public Hearing, Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 25 -04 Establishing Fee Schedule Pg. 20A -20I MAYOR BERGESON NOTED THE PUBLIC HEARING HAD BEEN HELD AT THE FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO BE HEARD ON THIS ITEM. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION ON SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 25- 04 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. UPON ROLL CALL VOTE, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) None. 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None. Page 2 EXPANDED AGENDA 6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Fox Den Acres, Jeff Smyser Pg. 21 -55 i. First Reading, Ordinance 26 -04, Rezone to Planned Unit Development MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, TO APPROVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 26-04 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. UPON ROLL CALL VOTE, THE VOTE WAS THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, BERGESON AND STOLTZ VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBERS DAHL AND CARLSON VOTED NAY. ii. Resolution 04 -196, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-196 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, BERGESON AND STOLTZ VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBERS DAHL AND CARLSON VOTED NAY. B) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -01, Preliminary Plat, Vaughan Addition, Paul Bengtson Pg. 56 -80 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 05-01 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing Soil Borings, Well No. 5, Jim Studenski Pg. 81 -84 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-199 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: FOUR AYES, ONE NAY. THE MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, DAHL, BERGESON AND STOLTZ VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON VOTED NAY. D) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -201, Modifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11, Michael Grochala Pg. 85 -114 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-201 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. Page 3 EXPANDED AGENDA PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES, TO INCLUDE THE LANGUAGE "FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF REMOVING THIS PARCEL FROM THE TIF DISTRICT." VOTE ON AMENDMENT TO MOTION: TWO AYES, THREE NAYS. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT FAILED. COUNCILMEMBERS DAHL AND CARLSON VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, BERGESON AND STOLTZ VOTED NAY. VOTE ON MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 04 -201: THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. Unfinished Business A) None. 8. New Business A) None. 9. Community Calendar, January 11, 2005 through January 24, 2005: A) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 6:30 p.m. B) Charter Commission Meeting, Thursday, January 13, 2005, 7:00 p.m. C) Council Work Session, Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 5:00 p.m. D) I -35 W/E Coalition Meeting, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 7:00 p.m., Hugo City Hall E) City Council Meeting, Monday, January 24, 2005, 6:30 p.m. 10. Adjourn MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:20 P.M. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Revised 01/04/05 jds 10:17 a.m. Page 4 • EXPENDITURES JANUARY 10, 2005 • • Date: 12/16/2004 Time: 12:01:14 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 4353 - 4353 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross, Discount Lost 000055 2ND WIND EXCERCISE EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 3,505.94 3,505.94 .00 .00 000148 TARGET 1 33,244.00 33,244.00 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 22.85 22.85 .00 .00 000621 LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER 1 16,000.00 16,000.00 .00 .00 000869 EAGLE CREST NW TOWNHOMES 1 213.11 213.11 .00 .00 ' 000897 LASHER, BRAD 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 000984 CONTRACT HARDWARE 1 2,953.00 2,953.00 .00 .00 001083 KOHL'S 1 20,013.00 20,013.00 .00 .00 002420 LINO LAKES SENIOR CENTER 1 744.89 744.89 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 3,304.05 3,304.05 .00 .00 0' • XCEL OUTDOOR LIGHTING 1 24,460.60 24,460.60 .00 .00 900569 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS ' 1 26,940.00 26,940.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 13 131,429.44 131,429.44 .00 .00* Date: 12/23/2004 Time: OB:08:13 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 4356 4356 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: 5 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00 000155 O'DEA, MARY JO 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000184 BOYLE, KATIE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000221 RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 000234 W.B. MILLER, INC. 1 53,745.17 53,745.17 .00 .00 000236 O'CONNELL, TERESA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000304 KUSTERMAN, BILL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000511 LADEN, PERRY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000548 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 C • DUFRESNE, KENNETH 1 213.11 213.11 .00 .00 000904 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000906 ANDERSON CUSTOM HOMES 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 .00 .00 000909 ISANTI COUNTY NORTARY DIVISION 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000911 WASHINGTON COUNTY NOTARY DIVISION 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 6,311.81 6,311.81 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 20.99 20.99 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 420.12 420.12 .00 .00 001813 IMATION IMAX THEATRE 1 264.00 264.00 .00 .00 001875 HUELMAN, PAT 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 Date: 12/23/2004 Time: 08:08:13 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Name Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002130 TRALLE, PAUL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00 002517 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 1 3,853.30 3,853.30 .00 .00 003011 MONTAIN, PAUL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 003221 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC 1 16,829.11 16,829.11 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 2 5,835.62 5,835.62 .00 .00 003467 SHARPER HOMES, INC. 2 4,500.00 4,500.00 .00 .00 004342 T & D HOMES 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 004367 TASCHUK, PAM 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004400 TESCH, DAN 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 004538 FREDERICKSON, AARON 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 004608 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004609 ROOT, MICHAEL 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004665 BAUMAN, BARBARA 1 ' 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004666 BOR, BARBARA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 0 • SMITH, DENNIS 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004764 CARROLL, JAMES 1 621.60 621.60 .00 .00 950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 42 102,368.83 102,368.83 .00 .00* • Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:13:17 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal • Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 4373 4373 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 242:13 242.13 .00 .00 000103 ONVOY, INC. ' 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 13,265.01 13,265.01 .00 .00 000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 2 140.81 140.81 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 175.30 175.30 .00 .00 000203 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS, LLC 2 1,054.60 1,054.60 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 1 2.43 2.43 .00 .00 000225 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC. 1 80.24 80.24 .00 .00 000228 ANOKA COUNTY ELECTIONS 1 41.54 41.54 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 3 383.97 383.97 .00 .00 • DPMS PANTHER ARMS, INC. 1 3.28 3.28 .00 .00 000489 TDS METROCOM 1 1,506.22 1,506.22 .00 .00 000504 LAND TITLE 1 179.96 179.96 .00 .00 000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 2 3,029.76 3,029.76 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 42.85 42.85 .00 .00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 1 24.00 24.00 .00 .00 000673 LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 1 2,073.50 2,073.50 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 1,188.00 1,188.00 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 106.50 106.50 .00 .00 000748 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS 1 1,008.00 1,008.00 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 35.15 35.15 .00 .00 000918 GENE'S SERVICE 1 33.62 33.62 .00 .00 • 7 Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:13:17 V. # Name City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 114.65 114.65 .00 .00 000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 134.98 134.98 .00 .00 000996 INTERSTATE BAr'1r.:RY SYSTEM OF MINNEAPOLIS 1 225.67 225.67 .00 .00 001007 RUBES, WILLIAM 1 286.70 286.70 .00 .00 001053 CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL ALIGN, INC. 1 255.61 255.61 .00 .00 001073 REHBEIN, CLYDE 1 38,500.00 38,500.00 .00 .00 001075 R & D BATTERIES, INC. 1 163.84 163.84 .00 .00 001076 T -RAY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 001081 GISKE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 403.74 403.74 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 122.95 122.95 .00 .00 001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 144.20 144.20 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 3 7,185.09 7,185.09 .00 .00 001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 520.00 520.00 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 122.81 122.81 .00 .00 f • NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 480.12 480.12 .00 .00 001475 TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 75.00 . 75.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 3 5,098.76 5,098.76 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 6 836.81 836.81 .00 .00 001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 432.40 432.40 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 ' 4,087.80 4,087.80 .00 .00 001881 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 1 580.00 580.00 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 4,339.23 4,339.23 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00 002107 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLIES, INC. 1 6.24 6.24 .00 .00 002144 JAY BROTHERS, INC. 1 508.00 508.00 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 • Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:13:18 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount 1 111/1# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 13.96 13.96 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 2 2,002.29 2,002.29 .00 .00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 189.51 189.51 .00 .00 002486 MATT PARROTT AND SONS COMPANY, INC. 1 108.41 108.41 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 63.78 63.78 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 105.00 105.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 630.00 630.00 .00 .00 003091 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 416.00 416.00 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 295.01 295.01 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 2 301.56 .301.56 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 25.89. 25.89 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 7 591.23 591.23 .00 .00 003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 3,888.50 3,888.50 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 4 15,246.64 15,246.64 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 164.30 164.30 .00 .00 • T.K.D.A. 17 43,557.25 43,557.25 .00 .00 004407 BUSCH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 1,980.00 1,980.00 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 4 787.00 787.00 .00 .00 004470 COMO LUSE & SUPPLIES, INC. 1 269.29 269.29 .00 .00 004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 1,365.00 1,365.00 .00 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 53.14 53.14 .00 .00 004606 U. S. BANK 1 762.50 762.50 .00 .00 004788 SPRINT 1 57.06 57.06 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 95.48 95.48 .00 .00 900060 DAY- TIMERS, INC. 1 57.96 57.96 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 5 7,428.89 7,428.89 .00. .00 Grand Totals: 127 171,907.12 171,907.12 .00 .00* • Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:27:18 • Ranges: Options: Operator: JAL Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: Print: Report Format: # of copies: Total By Account: Check # Vendor Alpha Name (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) D 1 1 Y 4354 4377 SOrt: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount 72751 2ND WIND EXCERCISE EQU 72752 2ND WIND EXCERCISE EQU 0 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A 72765 ANDERSON CUSTOM HOMES O BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 0 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 0 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG 72781 KEY LAND HOMES O LAND TITLE 72757 LASHER, BRAD 72786 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 0 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURAN 0 HARPER, CLYDE SHARPER HOMES, INC. T & D HOMES 0 T.K.D.A. EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT DELIVERY CHARG PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMS BLDG ESCROW /1582 S TOW /V W BEETLE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMB BLDG ESCROW /588 MY OVERPAYMENT /L4 /137 MILLER REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG PERMIT /6555 P PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE MARSHAN ESTATE REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6318 L REIMB BLDG ESCROW /7920 J PHEASANT HILLS 12 /NOVEMB Total for Dept ** 0 BLAINE, CITY OF PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 201 O INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 202 ADULT IN ADULT SP 72779 IMATION IMAX THEATRE PROGRAM REC SPECIAL 72758 LINO LAKES SENIOR CENT PROGRAM REC /BREAKFAST WI SPECIAL Total for Dept 205 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC DEC 15 Total for Dept 401 MAYOR /CO 0 ACCLAIM BENEFITS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST 72766 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMEN NOTARY COMMISSION /3 ADMINIST 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER ADMINIST 0 ONVOY, INC. WEB HOSTING ADMINIST 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING ADMINIST • 3,406.94 99.00 175.30 3,500.00 106.50 3,029.76 420.00 1,500.00 179.96 28.00 3,853.30 416.00 38,500.00 4,500.00 1,500.00 12,394.31 73,609.07* 1,188.00 1,188.00* 1,008.00 1,008.00* 264.00 744.89 1,008.89* 651.00 651.00* 144.20 100.00 44.64 50.00 561.30 Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:27:18 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O SPRINT MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER ADMINIST 72799 TESCH, DAN REIMBURSE MEETING ADMINIST 72802 WASHINGTON COUNTY NOTA NOTARY COMMISSION /2 ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 O ANOKA COUNTY ELECTIONS BATTERY Total for Dept 403 ELECTION O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER SENIORS Total for Dept 406 72766 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMEN NOTARY COMMISSION /3 FINANCE 0 MATT PARROTT AND SONS W- 2'S/1099'S /ENVELOPES FINANCE Total for Dept 407 O E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. COMPUTATIONS /MONUMENTS ECONOMIC 72756 KOHL'S 2ND HALF TAX ABATEMENT ECONOMIC O LANDFORM ENGINEERING C MASTER PLAN /NOVEMBER . ECONOMIC O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING ECONOMIC O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS /NOVEMBER ECONOMIC 72760 TARGET 2ND HALF TAX ABATEMENT ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 72778 HYDEN, MICHAEL 72784 LADEN, PERRY 72792 POGALZ, BRIAN 93 ROOT M AELIN G. ROOT, , MI CHAEL O TARGET O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE 72800 TRALLE, PAUL 0 T.K.D.A. QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND SUPPLIES SEC DEC B QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 416 PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING '04 ENGINEERING /NOVEMBER ENGINEER Total for Dept 417 O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER Communit Total for Dept 418 72764 0 0 72770 0 0 72774 72755 0 72788 72761 • A T & T WIRELESS AZD ELECTRIC SERVICE, ASPEN MILLS, INC. CARROLL, JAMES CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DPMS PANTHER ARMS, INC DUFRESNE, KENNETH EAGLE CREST NW TOWNHOM KUBES, WILLIAM NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS TARGET MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER SIREN MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SUPPLIES REIMBURSE TUITION /BOOKS OFFICE EQUIPMENT FIRING PIN REIMBURSE RESERVE TRAINI REIMBURSE EMS /BOOKS REIMBURSE TRAVEL MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER BATTERIES POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 57.06 30.00 100.00 1,087.20* 41.54 41.54* 45.71 45.71* 100.00 108.41 208.41* 520.00 20,013.00 2,073.50 16.63 374.00 33,244.00 56,241.13* 150.00 150.00 100.00 225.00 100.00 9.98 136.00 150.00 1,020.98* 1,061.20 1,061.20* 13.75 13.75* 49.00 242.13 24.00 621.60 5,752.70 3.28 213.11 213.11 286.70 420.12 22.85 Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:27:18 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 TASER INTERNATIONAL, I DOSKOCIL BOX 0 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 0 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN BATTERY PACK 72802 WASHINGTON COUNTY NOTA NOTARY COMMISSION /2 O XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER Total for Dept 420 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 72780 ISANTI COUNTY NORTARY NOTARY COMMISSION BUILDING O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER BUILDING Total for Dept 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72803 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT STREET SIGNS STREETS NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, STREET SIGNS STREETS NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER STREETS RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN MATERIAL /STREET LITE REP STREETS T -RAY CONSTRUCTION CO. INSTALL WIRE STREETS T.K.D.A. TDS METROCOM XCEL ENERGY '04 SEALCOAT /NOVEMBER STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER STREETS Total for Dept 430 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU TAPE O CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL REPLACE BALL O COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, DRUM /OIL O CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME HOSES 0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. GASOHOL S 0 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. O GENE'S SERVICE 0 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYS O LEEF BROTHER, INC. O LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I O MENARDS, INC. O MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBL O NEW HOLLAND PLAN 0 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP O WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, 0 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TI 0 72771 72772 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JOINTS PARTS /SUPPLIES THERMO /SEAL REPAIR KIT BATTERIES SHOP TOWELS OIL SEAL /BUSHING /SHAFT /V TAPE /CORD /SHEATHING LICENSE TABS /6 TRAILERS SHOCK ABSORBER CYLCINDER KEYS TIRES Total for Dept 431 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DAY - TIMERS, INC. HUGO HEATING AND COOLI IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH MENARDS, INC. R & D BATTERIES, INC. TARGET OFFICE SUPPLIES '05 POSTAGE PERMIT MONTHLY SERVICE / NOVEMEER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER HEAT PRINTING SERVICE TAPE /CORD /SHEATHING BATTERIES SUPPLIES REPAI FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FT,FPT FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 75.00 519.09 53.14 100.00 25.89 8,621.72* 100.00 76.42 176.42* 122.81 295.01 45.71 3,888.50 1,500.00 265.84 112.03 3,624.76 9,854.66* 2.43 255.61 269.29 122.95 7,185.09 301.56 836.81 33.62 225.67 13.96 189.51 35.06 105.00 134.98 6.24 80.24 1,054.'60 10,852.62* 114.65 150.00 5,936.14 1,676.19 57.96 580.00 1,647.77 18.08 163.84 32.87 Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:27:18 Operator: JAL Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER GOVERNME 775.04 O WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES GOVERNME 383.97 72762 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER GOVERNME 3,075.54 Total for Dept 432 14,612.05* 72766 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMEN NOTARY COMMISSION /3 O BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. PLATE 72772 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 72773 DEGARDNER, RICK REIMBURSE MILEAGE 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 72803 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER Total for Dept 450 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE RECREATI 0 MRPA CONFERENCE /LIZ B /BRIAN H RECREATI O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER RECREATI Total for Dept 451 72769 72775 72777 72783 72785 72787 72798 BOYLE, KATIE FREDERICKSON, AARON HUELMAN, PAT KUSTERMAN, BILL LINDY, GEORGE MONTAIN, PAUL TASCHUK, PAM QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 452 QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY STIPEND 72768 STIPEND 72776 STIPEND 72782 STIPEND O MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 72790 QUARTERLY STIPEND 72791 QUARTERLY STIPEND O IN ADVERTISING 72796 QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 461 • BAUMAN, BARBARA BOR, BARBARA GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE KUKONEN, ROD NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS O'CONNELL, TERESA O'DEA, MARY JO PRESS PUBLICATIONS, SMITH, DENNIS O BUSCH SYSTEMS INTERNAT RECYCLE BINS O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 O CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI 0 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA 0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN 0 MENARDS, INC. O NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 0 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC UTILILTY BILLING POSTAGE PLIERS CHEMICALS SCREWS LABOR /INSTALLATION MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM SOLID WA SOLID WA WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER 100.00 35.15 375.67 20.99 131.66 147.65 76.17 887.29* 222.86 630.00 14.82 867.68* 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 75.00 50.00 100.00 475.00* 150.00 150.00 150.00 225.00 45.71 100.00 150.00 13.30 150.00 1,134.01* 1,980.00 164.30 2,144.30* 201.87 140.81 5,098.76 10.64 1,365.00 45.71 216.20 Date: 01/04/2005 Time: 10:27:18 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER WATER 0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. TUBE CUTTER /COPPER /WHEEL WATER 72803 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER WATER Total for Dept 494 0 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI UTILILTY BILLING POSTAGE 0 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES WINCH /HARNESS /BLOWER /CAL 0 JAY BROTHERS, INC. BEAMS /SHELVES /UP- RIGHTS 0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI TRAINING /TIM B 0 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 0 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT PARTS /SERVICE -PUMPS 72762 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 72803 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER Total for Dept 495 72754 0 0 72759 72789 0 0 0 72801 72763 • COTTAGE HOMESTEADS GISKE CONSULTING GROUP KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK T.K.D.A. U. S. BANK W.B. MILLER, XCEL OUTDOOR 2ND HALF PAY -AS- YOU -GO T PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /AS LEGAL SERVICE /ISSUANCE & ACQUISITION /6275 HOLLY D CONTRACTOR /BLACK DUCK PU DESIGN /BIDDING FOR LEGAC CSAH B /14- NOVEMBER IMPROVEMENT /UTILITY 2004 100.06 95.48 1,387.82 8,662.35* SEWER 201.87 SEWER 4,339.23 SEWER 508.00 SEWER 15.00 SEWER 216.20 SEWER 13,265.01 SEWER 228.51 SEWER 746.87 19,520.69* OTHER 26,940.00 OTHER 225.00 OTHER 4,087.80 OTHER 16,000.00 OTHER 16,829.11 OTHER 14,872.64 OTHER 29,835.90 OTHER' 762.50 53,745.17 OTHER 24,460.60 187,758.72* INC. CONTRACTOR /HOLLY DRIVE OTHER LIGHTING MOVE POLES /HOLLY DRIVE Total for Dept 499 CONTRACT HARDWARE 2ND HALF PAY -AS- YOU -GO T CONTRACT Total for Dept 514 2,953.00 2,953.00* Grand Total 405,705.39* • • • AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 10 January 2005 SUBJECT Annual Appointments VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Each year the city council is required to make a number of appointments at it's first meeting of the year. The following is a list of appointments that need to be made: 2004 2005 Recommended 1. Acting Mayor Ms. Carlson 2. Legal Newspaper Quad Community Press Quad Community Press 3. Minute Taking Service TimeSaver, Inc. TimeSaver, Inc. 4: Employment Legal Service Barna, Guzy & Steffan Ldt. Barna, Guzy & Steffan Ldt. 5. Labor Services Labor Relations Associates Labor Relations Associates 6. Fiscal Agent Springsted, Inc. Springsted, Inc. 7. Assessor Anoka County Anoka County 8. North Metro Telecommunication Commission Ms. Dahl - Comissioner Mr. Tesch - Alternate 9. YMCA Board Gordon Heitke Gordon Heitke 10. Centennial Fire Steering Committee Mr. Stoltz- Elected Mr. Reinert - Elected Gordon Heitke, City Administrator 11. Vadnais Lake Watershed District removed to a later date. Mr. Jeff McDowell (2004 — 2006) No Action Required in 2005 12. County Corrections Program Mr. Stoltz 13. Joint Law Enforcement Committee Mr. Jeff Reinert 14. Legal Depositories Legal Depositories Cont. Community National Bank Wells Fargo US Bank Recommendation is to continue with current depositories. • • OPTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Merrill Lynch RBC Dain Rauscher Wachovia Prudential Securities Lino Lakes State Bank LMC 4M Fund Smith,Bamey, Citi Group Others as needed 15. Treasurer Finance Director Al Rolek, Finance Director 16. RCWD Andy Cardinal (2004 -2006) No Action Required in 2005 17. City Engineer TKDA TKDA 18 Charter Commission Liaison Council member Dahl 19. Environmental Board Liaison Council member Carlson 20. Centennial Utilities Commission Mr. Vern Reinert (3 Year Term) OPTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. • 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. RECOMMENDATION As recommended or council prerogative. .1: \Appointments\2005 \Annual Greensheet.doc • • • AGENDA ITEM 3C STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 10 January 2005 SUBJECT Meeting Schedule for 2005 VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND Please find attached a meeting schedule for 2005. We have made adjustments in December by moving the last meeting of the year up one week, as has been our custom. Approving the schedule for the year now will help with disbursements and notices throughout the year. OPTIONS 1. Approve the meeting schedule for 2005 2. Make adjustments to the 2005 meeting schedule. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • 2005 Work Session / Council Meeting Dates: Work Session City Council January 5 January 19 February 9 February 23 March 9 March 23 April 6 April 20 May 4 May 18 June 8 June 22 January 10 January 24 February 14 February 28 March 14 March 28 April 11 April 25 May 9 May 23 June 13 June 27 • July 6 July 11 • July 20 July 25 August 3 August 17 September 7 September 21 October 5 October 19 November 9 November 23 December 7 December 14 August 8 August 22 September 12 September 26 October 10 October 24 November 14 November 28 December 12 December 19 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 3D Gordon Heitke, City Administrator January 10, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING, Fee Schedule SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 25 -04, Establishing Fee Schedule 3/5 SIMPLE MAJORITY BACKGROUND: In order to provide for a more efficient and timely method of reviewing and adjusting the various fees charged by the City, all fees are being consolidated into one fee schedule to be reviewed and adopted on an annual basis. Upon the current advice of our City Attorney, we are setting all fees in the form of an ordinance. Some of these fees have specific statutory requirements, so those areas have been updated. Staff has reviewed the fees charged by the individual departments and recommended changes to increase or change fees in some cases, or for the purpose of coming into compliance with Minnesota statutory requirements. On December 13, 2004, Council approved first reading of Ordinance No. 25 -04. OPTIONS: 1. Approve second reading of Ordinance No. 25 -04. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. Ordinance No. 25 -04 • AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES FEE SCHEDULE AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES, PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; REPEALS ALL ORDINANCES, PARTS OF ORDINANCES AND PREVIOUS FEE SCHEDULES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH. The City of Lino Lakes city council does ordain the following: Section 1. Findings. Pursuant to Minnesota Law, the Lino Lakes City Charter, and the Lino Lakes City Code, and upon a review of a study conducted by City Staff, a fee schedule for City services and licensing is hereby adopted as follows: 2005 Master Fee Schedule (a) The Code of the City of Lino Lakes establishes that certain fees be set from time to time by the Lino Lakes City Council. Upon consideration and review of the fees charged, the City Council wishes to adopt the fee schedule as listed on Exhibit A hereto attached. (b) IllOction 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this _th day of , 2005. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • • ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXHIBIT A 2005 FEE SCHEDULE 3.2 BEER INVESTIGATION 3.2 BEER OFF -SALE 3.2 BEER ON -SALE 3.2 BEER ON -SALE TEMPORARY CLUB LICENSE LIQUOR LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE LIQUOR ON -SALE NEW LICENSE EXISTING LICENSE LIQUOR OFF -SALE LIQUOR TEMPORARY PERMIT TEMPORARY SET -UP LICENSE WINE LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE WINE SUNDAY LIQUOR $250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE $200.00/YEAR $300.00/YEAR $50.00 + $5.00/DAY $300.00 $250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE $4,500.00/YEAR $4,000.00 $200.00 $50.00 $25.00 $250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE $500.00/YEAR $200.00/YEAR AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION ARET LICENSE ANCES GAMBLING PERMIT APPLICATION STATE LICENSED GAMBLING: $35.00 $200.00/YEAR $10.00 REGULATION TAX 1 /10 OF 1% OF NET PROFITS BUILDING - CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES Building Permit Fee Schedule Fee Table Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $23.50 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $23.50 for the first $500.00 plus $3.05 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $69.25 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $391.25 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 ' $643.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 1 -20C- $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $993.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.15 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof 00,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $47.00 per hour* 2. Reinspection fee $47.00 per trip 3. Erosion Control Reinspection fee $47.00 per trip 4. Inspections for which no fee is specifically designed $47.00 per trip 5. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions $47.00 per hour ** 6. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Actual Cost * ** 7. Deck Permit Fee Permit fee table based on $10.00 per square foot value 8. Basement Finish Permit Fee Permit fee table based on $15.00 per square foot value 9. Underground Swimming Pool $141.00, plus state ITsurcharge O. Aboveground Swimming Pool $47.00, plus state surcharge 11. Plan Review Fee a. 65% of the Building Permit Fee b. In instances where two (2) or more permits are issued for a residential structure, the plan review fee shall be forty percent (40 %) per dwelling unit. 12. Escrow Fees At the time of the final certificate of occupancy if the following items are not completed, an escrow in the amount indicated will be taken. There are two options for entering into an escrow agreement with the City. The escrow can be paid to the City and an agreement filled out and signed by the payee and City Official, or the title company or lending institution can hold the escrow and fill out an agreement form stating they are the responsible party for holding the funds for the uncompleted items. c. Driveway - $1,000.00 d. Exterior Concrete - $1,000.00 e. Landscaping - $2,500.00 f. As -built Surveys - $1,000.00 g. Stucco (final coat only) - $1,000.00 h. Garage Floor - $1,000.00 i. There will be a $50.00 non - refundable administrative fee for escrow deposits The only time these items can be uncompleted is during the winter months, except landscaping. A temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued and unfinished work must be completed within six (6) months (weather permitting) after entering into the escrow agreement. 2 -20D- 13. Easement Encroachment Fee $30.00 14. Fence Permit $47.00 •15. Sign Permit Fee Table 16. All Residential Mechanical Permits, (except new construction and air conditioning $25.00 17. Residential New Construction Mechanical Permit $60.00 18. Residential Air Conditioning Permit 1% of the contract price ($25.00 minimum fee) 19. Commercial Mechanical Permit 1% of the contract price ($25.00 minimum fee) 20. Manufactured Home Permits $90.00 21. Plumbing Permit $9.00 per fixture ($15.00 minimum fee) 22. Sewer Connection Fee $200.00 23. Water Connection Fee $250.00 24. Contractor License Verification $5.00 per permit 25. Contractor License $50.00 26. SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) per Met Council • 27. 3/" Water Meter $290.00 28. 1" Water Meter $325.00 29. MXU Unit $125.00 30. Septic Installation or Repair Permit $150.00 31. Septic Pumping Permit $5.00 32. Demolition Permit $47.00 *Inspections made out side of normal business hours is a three -hour minimum charge * *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved. ** *Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs. SIGN PERMIT - TEMPORARY TOUCH PAD CURB STOP COVERS $25.00 /TERM $20.00 $68.00 escrow may be required, as determined by the City Engineer, to cover all costs incurred by the City for plan •*An revision and construction observation. 3 -20E- UTILITY FEES SOWER RATE WATER METER RENTAL ADDITIONAL ACCESSORIES WATER USAGE FEES VALVE REPLACEMENT UNDERGROUND UTILITY PERMIT $52.00 /QUARTER/REU +$1.00 PER 1000 GALLONS OVER 10,000 GALLONS $400.00 (DEPOSIT) / $25 PER MONTH $25.00 PER MONTH $10.00 PER QUARTER / REU $1.77 PER THOUSAND GALLONS (0 - 30,000 GAL.) $2.07 PER THOUSAND GALLONS (OVER 30,000 GAL.) $45.00 EACH $50.00 METER TESTING (OUR COST, DELIVERED TO MINNEAPOLIS) 5/8" - 3/4" METER TEST $50.00 1" METER TEST $65.00 1 -1/2" - 2" METER TEST $100 BUSINESS & MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENT SEARCH FEE OURNING PERMIT ITY HOME RULE CHARTER OG KENNEL DOG LICENSE MALE/FEMALE DOG LICENSE MALE/FEMALE ANIMALS IMPOUNDMENT FEE COPIES: CITY CODE BOOK COPIES: MAILED MINUTES COPIES: AGENDA COPIES: PER SIDE COPIES: NEW RESIDENT LABELS COPIES: AERIAL/TOPO MAP CITY MAP 20/20 BOOK COMP. PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK FAX CHARGE GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE OVERWEIGHT PERMIT PAWN SHOP CLASS A PAWN SHOP CLASS B CLASS A SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER S CLASS B SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER CLASS C SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER PAWN SHOP INVESTIGATION PAWN SHOP IN STATE INVESTIGATION $20.00 /SEARCH $70010.00 1ST COPY FREE /$10.00 EACH ADDITIONAL COPY $20.00/YEAR $10.00 $5.00 (SPAYED OR NEUTERED) $25.00* $75.00 $36.00/YEAR $12.00/YEAR $ 1ST 10 COPIES FREE, THEN .25 PER PAGE $5.00 PER MONTH FLAT FEE $10.00 $2.00 $3.50 $55.00 $55.00 $1.00/PAGE (NO LONG DISTANCE) $ 1$` 10 PAGES FREE, THEN .25 PER PAGE $75.00/FIRST TRUCK $45.00 EACH ADDITIONAL $20.00 $10,000.00 $7,000.00 $720.00 $105.00 $NO FEE $15,000. DEPOSIT $750.00 4 -20E- PAWN SHOP OUT STATE INVESTIGATION RECYCLING CONTAINER PURCHASE SIDENTS GUIDE ECIAL EVENT - TWO -DAY SALE PERMIT APES: AUDIO TAPES: VIDEO TOBACCO LICENSE TRANSIENT MERCHANT TREE PRESERVATION TAPE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN REVIEW TREE LOCATION INSPECTION VISITS SITE VISITS PEDDLER/SOLICITOR RETURN CHECK CHARGE ZONING MAPS ZONING ORDINANCE $20,000.00 1ST Free / $8.00 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL $1.00 $50.00 $25.0010.00 $15.00 $25.00/YEAR $250.00/6 MONTHS $15.95/ROLL $68.00 $68.00 $68.00 $250.00/6 MONTHS $27.50 $5.00 /LARGE or COLORED $25.00 CULVERT PRICES ALL CULVERT PRICES ARE BASED ON MARKET PRICES AND INCLUDE TAX & DELIVERY & AND 15% ADMINISTRATION FEE PARK & RECREATION USER FEES FIELD RENTAL — RESIDENT ONLY BASEBALL /SOFTBALL DRAG ONLY • BASEBALL /SOFTBALL DRAG & CHALK SOCCER (EXCLUDING YOUTH) PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION PARTY WAGON - BLOCK PARTY MON.- THURS., NON -BLOCK PARTY FRI., SAT. OR SUN.,NON -BLOCK PARTY PLAYGROUND GRAB BAGS FIRE REGULATIONS ANNUAL PERMIT FOR SALE OF CONSUMER FIREWORKS $20/EVENING $30 /EVENING $65 /EVENING RESIDENTS - NO FEE NON - RESIDENT - $25 NO FEE $25 $40 $10.00 / $25.00 $350 EXCLUSIVE RETAIL SELLER / $100 IN CONJUNCTION WITH EXISTING RETAIL STORE PLANNING& ZONING FEE APPLICATION FEE (REQUIRED WITH EACH SUBMITTAL) $50 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT • 40 ACRES OR LESS MORE THAN 40 ACRES 5 -20G- ESCROW DEPOSIT* $750 $1,500 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL OIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET INTERIM USE PERMIT REZONING 40 ACRES OR LESS MORE THAN 40 ACRES $300 $1,500 $10,000 $300 $1,000 $2,000 SITE PLAN REVIEW $1,500 SUBDIVISION MINOR SUBDIVISION / LOT SPLIT PRELIMINARY PLAT 40 ACRES OR LESS OVER 40 ACRES) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PARK DEDICATION - RESIDENTIAL PARK DEDICATION — COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL $1,000 $2,500 $5,000 $7,500 $2,075 PER UNIT $2,175 PER UNITACRE TAX INCREMENT FINANACING OR TAX ABATEMENT $7,500 OACATION (street, utility, drainage) $500 $200 ARIANCE *An escrow account shall be established as indicated above to cover all expenses incurred by the City as part of the plan review. In the case of applications including multiple requests the highest escrow deposit amount will be the only one initially required. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City during plan review. If the escrow account drops below 10% of the original deposit amount the City will require the submittal of an additional escrow deposit sufficient to cover any anticipated expenses. Upon the City's determination that the project is complete or expired, the City will return the remaining escrow deposit to the applicant. POLICE FEES DANGEROUS DOG PERMIT COPY OF REPORT VEHICLE LOCKOUTS CLEARANCE LETTER FINGERPRINTING VIDEO IMAGE PRINTING PHOTOGRAPHS BOOKING PHOTOGRAPHS ELECTRONIC PHOTOGRAPHS FALSE ALARMS •VEHICLE FORFEITURE FEE VIDEOTAPE COPY 6 -20H- $35.00 $5.00 UP TO 5 PAGES, THEN $.25 / PAGE NO CHARGE $5.00 $10.00, BY APPT. $5.00 $25.00 PLUS DEVELOPING COST $5.00 $5.00 PER PAGE OF FOUR 3 FREE; 4 -10 $50.00; 11 OR MORE $100.00 /CALENDAR YR. $100.00 PER VEHICLE $25.00 COSTS INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE TAXES * ITY INCURRED COSTS IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ADDED TE PENALTY FEE: A LATE CHARGE OF 10% OR $25.00, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, WILL BE CHARGED FOR ANY FEES NOT PAID WHEN DUE. • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 A i. and ii. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: January 10, 2005 TOPIC: i. First Reading, Ordinance 26 -04 Rezone to Planned Unit Development ii. Resolution 04 -196, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Fox Den Acres Royal Oaks Realty BACKGROUND Royal Oaks Realty has requested approval of single family residential development called Fox Den Acres. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density residential use. The site is within the existing MUSA and it is zoned R -1. The Fox Den Acres project offers a good opportunity to implement the new parks and open space plan through the use of a conservation development. Staff have worked with the Watershed District and Royal Oaks to pursuit these goals. The redesign includes such things as filling and moving lower quality wetlands in order to preserve and increase higher quality wetlands and upland areas. The overall gain in public value will be positive. This conservation development approach, while often discussed in Lino Lakes in the past, has not previously been pursued to the extent we are doing so here. Standard zoning requirements often do not accommodate natural features in this way, and this is an example of that shortcoming. Therefore, a planned unit development is being used. The discussions have centered not on asking "does this meet the requirements ?" bur rather "what is the best design ?" We have utilized the review extension allowed by law, and we are facing a deadline of December 21St for City Council action . Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer and Associates has provided invaluable assistance on this project . Mr. Schoenbauer has been intimately involved in working directly with the developer on behalf of the City. His memo on the project is attached. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. • • Fox Den Acres, page 2 Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site vacant 40 acres: Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 North radio tower and other communication facilities Low Density Unsewered and Sewered Residential . R -1 South wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural East wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural West single family residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density: Gross Site Area 50 acres Upland Area 38 acres Total Lots 57 Gross Density 1.14 units /acre Net Density 1.50 units /acre The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and within the existing MUSA. Public water, sanitary sewer, and a public street are stubbed to the site. This site has been guided and zoned for development for many years, even previous to the current comprehensive plan adopted in 2002. The design fits within the Low Density range of up to three units per acre. Even if the areas outside the MUSA, about ten acres, are subtracted from the upland, the density would be about two units per acre (57/28 = 2.04). Growth Management: It is already within the current MUSA, so the Stage 1 MUSA reserve allocation limit is not relevant. As a conservation development, this project is not subject to the annual growth limits, as amended by Ordinance 24 -04. Conservation Development: Ordinance 24 -04 amends the growth management policy to encourage conservation development by allowing a conservation development project to exceed the annual growth limits if it results in public values above those achievable under conventional development. The public values in the ordinance include but are not limited to the following: a. Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and development policies The project preserves over 50% of the site in open space. b. Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint The area being disturbed is smaller than conventional development would be. • • • Fox Den Acres, page 3 c. Restoring /enhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process The project includes a stewardship plan that includes restoration. d. Protecting off -site ecological systems through increased buffering The project includes open space as buffers on all four sides of the site. This will serve to protect water quality and habitat. e. Ensuring long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer The project includes a stewardship plan that includes and endowment. f. Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System Plan The project includes a trail within the open space areas on the west, south, and east sides. g. Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically - based approaches The project includes natural infiltration as part of the design. h. Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed The project preserves over 50% of the site in open space which will be protected with a stewardship plan. i. Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments An open space buffer is included along the border with existing development on the west side of the project site. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT Lots: In order to preserve as much open space as possible, lot dimensions have been adjusted. A handful of lots have less area than the R -1 minimum. Many lots are less deep than normal zoning requires, and the rear setbacks are reduced. However, the additional area behind these lots is greater than what would be in a normal lot. In much of the plat, the open space behind the lots extends for several hundred feet. The feeling of openness is greater, though the actual lot line depth is less than normal. Another means of increasing the common open space is the use of decreased setbacks from the street. The setbacks in this project will be 25 feet from the right of way rather than the normal 30 feet. (Remember that the right of way included more land than the actual paved street.) This 25' setback is allowed by the PUD standards. • ID • Fox Den Acres, page 4 Streets, Access, Parking: The rights of way for the internal streets is 50 feet. This is less than the normal 60 feet. The pavement width also is reduced. These are two more ways of increasing the open space in the project: narrowing the rights of way allows for more open space behind the lots. The narrower pavement reduces impervious surface. The PUD standards specifically allow the pavement to be reduced in this way. Two changes are needed to the pavement widths shown on plans. First, the existing stub of Fox Road just east of Deerwood Lane is 32' back of curb to back of curb. This width must be maintained until the intersection with the internal circular street (Red Fox Road). Second, the new streets are currently shown as 28' from back of curb to back of curb (rather than the normal 32'). The pavement should be 28' face of curb to face of curb. This will allow 20' for fire truck passage with parking on one side. This can be accommodated within the 50' right of way. The comprehensive plan for the community includes this as an area to be developed. One road is stubbed to it in a previous development project, as are water and sewer. In the past, many neighborhoods were created with only one access, but now we want to provide more than one . Therefore, we must look for another access option if the comprehensive plan is to be implemented here. The 500' radio tower on the north is likely to stay. The proposed road stub to the north of the plat avoids the tower property. Land to the north of the stub does have on it several communication facilities such as satellite dishes and the like, but it would not require major physical effort to remove the existing facilities. It is possible that a road could extend to the north where pictured if these facilities were removed in the future. That area includes upland, though it is impossible to know how much without a delineation of that property. A "ghost plat" of the area shows it will be possible to fit in a road and some lots. (see attached) Fox Road is the only current access point for this site. An extension of Fox Rd. to a future outlet /connection to the north is included in the design. Wetland extends to the east and south of the project for more than 1000', so a road cannot go in those directions. There is no possible additional connection on the west because the existing homes of Reshanau Lake Estates South 4th Addn. Hindsight shows that Deerwood Lane should have been designed to provide a connection to the east at its southern end instead of curving west into a cul de sac. This is no longer an option, however. We will prohibit parking on the stretch of Fox Road between the existing Deerwood Lane and the new internal circular street in the plat (Red Fox Road). This will allow for clearer passage between the intersections. In the future, when land to the north develops, this new road can be connected. This would provide not only a second access for this site, but an additional access alternative for the neighborhoods that exist now. • • • Fox Den Acres, page 5 Traffic: The developer submitted a traffic study with the previous application for 64 lots. The original study did not recognize the completion of West Shadow Lake Drive through to 62nd. St. or the reconstruction of 62nd St. Staff made the developer's consultant aware of this, and an amended study takes into account the current and planned roadways. The result is that the Birch St. approach and intersection will continue to operate at a level of service C. The City's transportation analysts have reviewed the study and agreed with its conclusions. Existing residents have voiced the concern that they do not want additional traffic on the roads. Utilities: City water and sanitary sewer service will connect to existing facilities in Fox Road. Both are adequate to serve the project. Grading and Stormwater Management: The redesign includes relocating smaller wetland areas of lesser quality and mitigating (recreating) them in areas that will increase the higher quality wetlands. The design also includes infiltration methods that will help filter water prior to running into ponds or wetlands. Existing residents have expressed concern about stormwater ponds that serve their neighborhoods. The existing, natural drainage of the site includes a relatively small area that drains to the northwest. The remainder of the site currently drains to the north, east, and south. Drainage patterns will not change to any significant degree. No increase in runoff rate is allowed. This is a standard requirement for all development which is enforced both the Watershed District and the City. Parks, Open Space: The comprehensive plan envisions a conceptual greenway on part of this site. In addition, the City approved a new "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan." Creating greenways to implement the concept presented in the comprehensive plan is the first priority of the new parks and open space plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater reliance on a conservation development approach to land development. There are 40 acres within existing MUSA and growth area. About 18 acres of this, or 45 %, will be permanent open space. All 10 acres of the plat that are outside of the MUSA will be part of the permanent open space. The total site is 50 acres and the permanent open space will include 28 acres, about 56 %. A PUD requires at least 50 %. The preservation of open space on this site will be an important step in the implementation of the greenway vision. This is along the edge of a high value natural feature area that includes a major drainage through the southern part of Lino Lakes. A city trail would be created as part of the plat. The land around the trail likely would be owned by the homeowners association and maintained as perpetual open space through a conservation easement over the area . The specifics, including the easement holder and the terms of the management plan will require more detailed legal documents, which will be worked out prior to final platting as part of the development agreement. • Fox Den Acres, page 6 REZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Rezoning: A PUD is not allowed as a conditional use permit in an R -1 zoning district, so a rezoning to PUD is needed. As stated in Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the zoning ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The project implements the Parks, Trails and Open Space plan through conservation development to provide an important greenway. Greenways are encouraged by the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Single family residential development exists to the west. It is unlikely that development can occur to the east or south due to extensive wetlands. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. With the conditions of approval, the project will conform to the requirements of a planned unit development as stated in the zoning ordinance. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and sufficient capacity exists. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The existing roads have the capacity for the additional development. PUD: Section 2, Subd. 10.A. of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development (PUD). In addition, Subd. 10.D. lists the purposes of an urban PUD. The application should be compared to these purposes in order to justify any flexibility requested by the applicant. It is clear that the project fulfills most if not all of these purposes. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the • • Fox Den Acres, page 7 Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. Urban PUD Purposes: a. Preservation of wildlife habitat and unique natural resources. b. Reduction of negative impacts on the environment. c. Creation of common open space that provides a unified landscape for the use and enjoyment of the neighborhood community and /or the general public. d. A variety of urban residential lot sizes, configurations, and neighborhoods. • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD • • Fox Den Acres, page 8 The Environmental Board reviewed an earlier design of the project on July 28. The recommendations included pursuing a conservation development, with design flexibility, to facilitate a greenway corridor. The Board reviewed the current design on October 27 and unanimously recommended approval. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD The P & Z reviewed the project over several months (August, September, October meetings). At the October meeting, the P & Z unanimously recommended approval of the current design. OPTIONS 1. Approve the project including: i. First reading of Ordinance 26 -04: Rezone to Planned Unit Development ii. Resolution 04 -196: Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat with conditions listed in the resolution. 2. Deny the project. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE 26 -04 APPROVING REZONING FROM R -1 TO RESIDENTIAL PUD FOR FOX DEN ACRES The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1: Findings The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.l E of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. Royal Oaks Realty submitted an application for an amendment to the zoning ordinance to rezone land to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The currently zoning of the site is R -1, Single Family Residential. The proposal includes platting the site as Fox Den Acres. 3. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential uses and is within the existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area. 4. The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential use. Land to the west is guided for similar use and is developed as a single family neighborhood. Land to the north is a regional park reserve. Existing and anticipated future land uses in the area are considered compatible with the proposed uses. 5. Upon compliance with the conditions of approval set forth in Resolution 04 -196, the proposed uses will conform with all performance standards contained in the zoning ordinance and other requirements. 6. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are currently available to the site and there is ample capacity for the addition of eight homes. • 7. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Section 2 The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on March 10, 2003 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residential to Residential Planned Unit Development pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: (see Attachment A for legal description) Section 3 Development shall conform with plans, requirements, and conditions of approval listed in Resolution 04 -196 and associated infoimation. Section 4 As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5 • This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004 ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor - 3 0 - Ordinance 26 -04, page 2 • ATTACHMENT A: LINO LAKES ORDINANCE 26 -04 • • Description of FOX DEN ACRES SITE Parcel A: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel B: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33: thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 15 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds West 1008.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds West 160.00 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter: thence North 00 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds West along said west line a distance of 970.11 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel C: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 28 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1304.74 feet to the Northeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 25 degrees 18 minutes 53 seconds West 387.05 feet; thence North 22 degrees 00 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 377.62 feet to said north line; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 28 seconds West along said north line a distance of 332.74 feet; thence South 64 degrees 53 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 729.37 feet to the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 50 minutes 22 seconds West along said west line 310.00 feet to the point of beginning. - 3 1 - Ordinance 26 -04, page 3 • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 04 -196 APPROVING PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FOX DEN ACRES WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings: Findings 1. Royal Oaks Realty has submitted an application for a residential planned unit development (PUD) and a development stage plan/preliminary plat for the PUD. 2. The site includes approximately 50 acres. 3. The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential development . 4. Ordinance No. 26 -04 rezones the site from R -1, Single Family Residential to Residential Planned Unit Development. ISO 5. The Fox Den Acres project is a conservation development. • 6. The Planning & Zoning Board opened a public hearing on the application on August 11 and closed the hearing on October 13, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the application for a planned unit development /development stage plan for Fox Den Acres. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval shall apply: 1. The City Engineer's comments in the memo of December 8, 2004 must be addressed to his satisfaction. 2. The streets shall be 28' face of curb to face of curb except that the width of the existing stub of Fox Road east of Deerwood Land shall be continued to the first intersection with the internal circular street. 3. No parking shall be allowed on the stretch of Fox Road between the existing Deerwood Lane and the new internal circular street in the plat. 4. Park dedication shall be cash with credit for construction of trails. 5. A homeowners association shall be created. The association shall maintain a stewardship fund to manage the open space areas of Outlots A, B, and C, according to a stewardship plan • • to be approved by the City. Association documents shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. 6. A conservation easement shall be created over all of Outlots A, B, and C to make them peuuanent open space. 7. A temporary cul de sac must be constructed on the northern stub street. 8. The project as redesigned must obtain a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to final plat approval by the City Council. 9. This approval is based on the preliminary plat and preliminary grading plan dated 10- 20 -04. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor - 33 - Resolution 04 -196, page 2 • • Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes Conservation Development Public Statement p b[ie Valne Sta�emen� anti General Agreement Parameters for the Fox Den Development (A Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Development Project) Date: October 7, 2004 From: Jeff Schoenbauer, Vice President Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Planning Consultant to the City of Lino Lakes To: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Jeff Smyser, City Planner Overview The following summarizes the key development parameters associated with the Fox Den development proposal. Each of these is in keeping with the conservation development planning principles that have been discussed in recent months with the Environmental Board, Park Board, Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. Context Using the conservation development approach for this project is an outgrowth of the recently completed Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenway and Trail System Plan. As part of that project, Fox Den was identified as private development of significant importance to achieving the goals of the system plan. With consent of the Developer, the project serves as a prototype for a collaborative approach to development, with a specific focus on maximizing public values within the context of an economically viable and marketable development. Opportunities for Increased Public Values Under the new Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenway and Trail System Plan, a number of specific public values are being sought from the Fox Den development. These include: • Preserving more natural open space (through a conservation easement) • Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint • Restore /enhance ecological systems on the site as part of the development process • Protect off-site ecological systems through increased buffering • Ensure long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer • Provide public park and trail opportunities consistent with the System Plan • Manage stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration approaches • Preserve the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed. • Maintain natural buffer between established and new developments As defined in this statement and the development package, the collaboration between the City, Developer, and other public agencies has resulted in a development plan that achieves these public values to a much higher degree than would be achievable under a conventional development approach. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 1 - 3 4 - Conservation Development Planning , City of Lino Lakes Developer and Public Agencies Commitment to the Project All prototype processes require a good faith working relationship between all parties to be successful. In this instance, the representatives from Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. have participated at the highest collaborative level. This is especially noteworthy in that their previously submitted plan did meet (or would have with minor modifications) the various requirements of the City and other regulatory agencies and would likely have been approved. Without their involvement, the proposal now being considered would not have been possible. It is also noteworthy that various regulatory agencies have played an active and important role in shaping the development proposal to be consistent with their and the City's larger goals. This is especially the case with Rice Creek Watershed District, whose representatives are assisting in key aspects of the natural resources and storm water management planning. Agreement Parameters The following establishes the agreement parameters for each key aspect of the development package. A number of exhibits are also included to illustrate the evolution of the plan. (Each of the headings relate to the previously defined public values.) Preserving Natural Open Space (Conservation Easement) The overall development site consists of 50 acres. The final development proposal (Exhibit C) sets aside 28.47 acres, or about 57% of the site, in a conservation easement that will be perpetually preserved as natural open space. Currently, City staff and the City Attorney are considering if outright ownership of the easement is in the best interest of the City, or if it should be held by some third party. However that is resolved, the conservation easement would, at the very least, be legally protected through a Developer's agreement between the Developer and City of Lino Lakes. The proposal also includes approximately 4,400 lineal feet of trail, which is approximately 0.80 miles. The following graphic illustrates the conservation areas and trail corridor that are part of the final development proposal. Ca r: atoll kreaj'. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. General Information: Total Lots: 57 Total Acres: 50.0 Developed Acres`: 27.53 Conservation Area Acres": 28.47 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area 57% Total Mlles of Public Trail: 0.80 ' P -efers to land w der private ownership. Refers to and that permanently protected and falls under the stewardship pfu ram. EXHIBIT C - FINAL PROPOSAL Fox DEN DEVELOPMENT - 3 5 - 2 Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes For comparison, the proposal that the Developer already submitted following a conventional approach (Exhibit A) sets aside 10.98 acres for open space, which is 22% of the site. An initial proposal under the conservation development approach (Exhibit B) resulted in 27.18 acres of open space, which is 54% of the site. The key difference between the two conservation development proposals is that the cul -de -sac in the southwest corner of Exhibit B has been removed to preserve more high quality natural areas as shown under Exhibit C. Although one lot has been added under the final proposal (to cover the lost value of the higher priced cul -de -sac lots that were removed), it still resulted in more open space due to the elimination of the cul -de- sac itself. The following graphics illustrate the conservation areas and trail corridors that are part of these two development proposals. Total Lots: 56 Total Acres; 50.0 Developed Acres*: 39.02 Conservation Area. Acres": 10.98 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area 22% Total Miles of Public Trait: 0.80 Refers to rand under primate ownership. ••. Reters to tend that rs permanently protected, Note There es no stewardship program under this proposal. EXHIBIT A - CONVENTIONAL PROPOSAL Fox DEN DEVELOPMENT eneral Information: Total Lot: 56 Total Acres: 50.0 Developed Acres*: 22.82 Conservation Area Acres': 27.18 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area 54% Total Miles of Public Trail: 0.55 • Refers to Land under povat_ • ownership, **Refers to land that is permanently. prnteeted. Note There n no sexardst, program under this proposal FxHIBrr e - INITIAL PROPOSAL Fax DEN DEVELOPMENT ip Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 3 - 3 6 - Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes Reducing the Extent of Impervious Surfaces and Size of the Development Footprint To preserve as much natural open space as possible, the development size and scale was reduced to the smallest possible footprint while still meeting the Developer's marketability and economic requirements. This includes reducing the roadway widths from 32' to 28' to minimize the extent of hard surfaced areas. The roadway right -of -way is also reduced to 50' Flexibility on the front yard setback is also proposed to reduce the overall size of lots and increase the size of the conservation area. Currently, a 30' setback is required. The plan allows this to be reduced to 25', although the Developer will often be at or near the 30' mark on many lots. The flexibility is provided for instances where it is mutually beneficial to do so and where the setback does not interfere with parking in driveways. Restore /Enhance On -Site Ecological Systems The development proposal includes restoring and enhancing on -site ecological systems in a couple of ways: • Through the use of natural infiltration systems to manage stormwater (as defined below). This ensures that contaminants associated with hard surface stormwater runoff are trapped before they reach on and off -site surface and groundwater systems. • Through restoration of degraded ecological systems both during development and as part of the long -term stewardship program (as defined below). Note that the City staff and Rice Creek Watershed District representatives have taken the lead role in working with the Developer to prepare a natural resources plan for the site. This approach was used to ensure that natural resource restoration and management efforts that occur on the site are in sync with long -range City and watershed district practices in this regard. Protect Off -Site Ecological Systems Through Increased Buffering / Maintain Natural Buffer Between Established and New Developments As the previous illustrations define, the extent of buffering proposed under the final conservation development plan (Exhibit C) is significantly greater than the other plans. From an ecological perspective, the increased size of the buffers on the north, west, and east sides offer greater protection of high quality off-site ecological systems. From an adjacent property perspective, the buffers on the west side provide a substantial separation between existing homes and the new ones in this development Ensure Long -Term Natural Resource Stewardship The development proposal includes a stewardship program and fund agreement that will ensure that all lands within the conservation easement will be perpetually managed and maintained as natural areas. The program will be funded through an endowment established by the Developer, along with annual fees paid by homeowners. The following outlines estimated* funding levels over a 20 year time horizon: Endowment Fund: Initial desired investment *: $100,000 (investment made by the Developer.) Estimated interest per year *: $4,000 at 4% and $8,000 at 8% Yearly Homeowner's Assoc. Fees* $5,700 ($100 /year per lot) Total available each year (approx.) *: $9,700 to $13,700, depending on interest rates. Value of fund over 20 year horizon: $194,000 to $274,000 ** ** Note: Funding levels are estimates and subject to some adjustments as the project is finalized. * Does not include a built -in reinvestment factor that stipulates reinvesting 10% of the interest earned each year and 5% of the yearly association fees. Over 20 years, the total value would go up considerably if this reinvestment was factored in. Additional value: $40,000 budget for initial restoration work in the conservation easement during development. (The extent of this work will be defined as part of final development package. It will include work associated with natural infiltration systems, restoring native plant communities to disturbed areas during construction, and ecological restoration work on select natural areas within the easement as defined by City staff and Developer as part of development agreement.) Total value of endowment fund and related ecological stewardship: $234,000 to $314,000 (over 20 year horizon) Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 4 - 3 7 - • • • Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes The stewardship program will also include a general covenant that ensures that all homeowners are accountable for protecting the conservation easement. Activities within the conservation easement will be strictly limited to natural resource stewardship. The easements will also have signs placed along its perimeter at each property to control encroachment. The sign locations will be recorded and periodically checked using GPS technology. Provide Public Park and Trail Opportunities Consistent with the System Plan The final conservation development proposal as defined under Exhibit C meets or exceeds the goals established for parks, trails, and open space in this area. The proposed trail is a significant part of the overall trail corridor through this area of the city, ultimately linking the development to neighborhood parks and the regional park system. As the previous graphic illustrates, the total length of public trail under the final development proposal is approximately 0.80 miles. Manage Stormwater Using Natural Infiltration Approach Through an unprecedented collaborative effort, the City, Rice Creek Watershed District, and development are working collaboratively on using natural infiltration techniques to manage stormwater from the development. The basic approach is to emulate some of the practices used for the City Hall campus, which includes rain gardens and a variety of other systems to control stormwater flow rates and quality. Importantly, stormwater flows will be managed to avoid any increased flows onto or through nearby developments to the west. Preserve the Open Space Aesthetic By setting aside more land for natural open space than previously envisioned and implementing a long -term stewardship plan that ensures that this land is cared for, the open space aesthetic qualities to which community residences have become accustomed will be preserved to a much higher degree than would typically be the case following a conventional approach to development. A comparison of Exhibits A and C illustrates this point. Additional Agreement Parameters: Commitments to the Developer Inherently, realizing the public values associated with the final development proposal affects the economics of the development. Throughout the process, a good faith effort has been made to balance the interests of the City with those of the Developer. To be successful for all parties, the project has to be economically viable. It must also be recognized that the proposal is a package deal, meaning that each aspect of it is intricately related to everything else. Changing one thing inherently affects another. The agreement parameters defined above, along with the development proposal package, have addressed most aspects of the physical development plan and establishing funding for the stewardship program. There are, however, a number of additional agreement parameters that are very important to the development proposal that have not been covered thus far. The following defines each of these. Amendment of the City's Growth Management Policy Under current policy, yearly growth limits preclude the Developer from getting approval to build the entire development in one year under a single proposal. This significantly affects development costs due to the loss of economies of scale, additional remobilization costs, longer marketing and build -out period, etc. For the Developer to provide the public values as previously defined, it will be necessary to give them approval for the entire project in order to make the economics of the project feasible. This will require an amendment to the growth management policy of the City. Note that without this approval, the development proposal will become invalid in its current form. This is especially the case with the endowment fund, which, in a large part, is funded through the economic savings associated with approval for developing the entire project under one proposal. This would entail a direct economic loss to the City of $194,000 to $274,000 over a twenty year period. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 5 -38- • Conservation Development Planning , City of Lino Lakes Reduction of Infrastructure Costs As previously stated, the reduction in roadway widths (from 32' to 28') and the use of natural infiltration systems are motivated by trying to preserve more open space and reduce ecological impacts due to runoff from hard surfaces. On the Developer's side, this also results in less development costs. As part of the agreement, much of these savings have been relocated to fund the endowment fund and other public values. As with the growth management issue, the economies of the project rely on the City approving these aspects of the development package. Park Dedication and Storm Sewer Related Fees As with all developments, park dedication and storm sewer - related fees apply to the development. In this case, the total charge for park dedication is approximately $94,000. For storm sewer, the charge is approximately $125,000. As part of the development proposal, City staff is recommending that the development costs for the new trail be credited against park dedication fees. This amounts to approximately $62,000. With respect to the storm sewer fees, City staff is recommending a credit of $58,000 due to the additional costs associated with using a natural infiltration approach to storm water management. This approach is also expected to reduce the City's long -term maintenance cost since their will be fewer storm sewers to maintain, thus providing additional justification for providing a credit to the Developer. As with the other items listed above, the economies of the project rely on the City approving the fee credits as part of the development package. Gaining Unified Consensus One of the goals of the collaboration is to gain strong consensus and approval from all of the boards and agencies that review and approve development projects. Every attempt was made to understand and address the best interests of the following public entities: • Environmental Board • Park Board • Planning and Zoning Board • City Council • TEP Committee • Rice Creek Watershed District It is the belief of all participants that the development package as proposed achieves the highest expectations for the project and will result in superior development to which both the Developer and citizens of Lino Lakes can take pride. Sincerely, Jeff Schoenbauer Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 6 - 3 9 - .TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: _ James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Engineering Review of Lino Lakes City Engineer Fox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Owner/Developer: Patrick M. Windier, P.E. Royal Oaks Realty James Jacques, P.E. Date: December 8, 2004 Comm. No. 12976 -002 The engineering review below for the above - referenced development site is based on the following documents: • • 1. Previous engineering reviews done by TKDA (Scott Brink, P.E.), for the City of Lino Lakes, dated April 8, 2004, and July 30, 2004. 2. "Preliminary Grading Plan of Fox Den Acres" for Royal Oaks Realty (Owner and Developer) as submitted by Piowe Engineering (Craig G. Schlichting, P.E.) and E.G. Rud and Sons - Land Surveyors (Daniel W. Obermiller, RLS), dated November 17, 2004. Stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on November 22, 2004. 3. "Wetland Replacement Plan for Fox Den Acres" and as part of Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Application No. 04 -039 as submitted by Earth Science Associates, Inc. (Kenneth E. Meek, PG, CPG), dated November 17, 2004 (4 pages). Stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on November 22, 2004. 4. Packet of drainage calculations and drainage divide maps for pre and post development conditions as submitted by Piowe Engineering, Inc., stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on November 22, 2004. "Preliminary Plat of Fox Den Acres" for Royal Oaks Realty (Owner and Developer) as submitted by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. - Land Surveyors (Daniel W. Obermiller, RLS) and dated October 20, 2004. Stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on October 25, 2004. General 1. The proposed project area is located south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east termination point of Fox Road. The total property area is 50 acres. It is proposed to install streets, sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer to serve 57 single family residential units. This is a revision from the 64 units originally proposed. This reduction appears to be from the elimination of units previously located in Parcel B which is located outside of the MUSA service area. Engineering Review 'ox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • Page 2 December 8, 2004 2. As a result of the plan revision, the site layout, grading, stormwater routing, and utilities have been adjusted in some locations. Revised drainage calculations have also been submitted. 3. Of the 50 acres, approximately 75% is upland or developable, while the remainder is pockets of wetlands scattered throughout the property or portions of DNR Wetland No. 565P, which borders the south and east edge of the properties. According to the information provided, the Ordinary High Water Level of the wetland is 893.0, and the Flood Zone limits have been indicated on the survey in accordance with the local Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated May 17, 1982. A ponding and flowage easement in favor of the City of Lino Lakes (Document No. 595478), corresponding roughly to the Flood Zone limits, is also indicated on the Plan. A Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) will ultimately be required to perform the improvements as proposed. 4. A Resource Inventory Survey has also been prepared for this site. The site is generally undulating with mixtures of wooded areas, pasture, and wetlands. According to records of a Soil Survey by the USDA Soil Conservation service, the soils are generally fine sands and fine sandy loams with the exception of areas of muck in the vicinity of the lower flood plain areas. A Geotechnical Report as referenced above has also been provided and provides the following observations of note: a) Glacial outwash deposits of fine sand dominate the area. b) In the lowland areas, a black organic topsoil has developed, varying in thickness from 1 to 3.25 feet at the test pits. The total thickness of organic topsoil in the lowland areas was not explored. This should especially be taken into consideration where utilities and roadways traverse through lowland areas. c) The majority of test pits and test borings exhibited soil mottling which was used to assist in determining seasonal high ground water levels. Grading and Drainage 1. A General Stormwater Discharge Permit, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will be required in accordance with the most current requirements of NPDES Phase II and State of Minnesota regulations. All NPDES regulations and requirements in accordance with the MPCA shall be adhered to, including submittal to the City of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control must be enforced at all times during the course of all grading and utility work. This includes the establishment of silt fence around all graded and disturbed areas, and the sweeping of streets on a regular basis, and as directed by the City. As per RCWD requirements, the grading plan must also be revised to specify inlet protection for the proposed catch basins. In the event the Contractor does not maintain erosion control as required, any costs incurred by the City as a result will be withheld from escrows or other monies due. It is strongly suggested that a note be added to all construction plan sheets (including grading, streets, and utilities) reminding the Contractor to address erosion control requirements. 3. The Grading Plan indicates that wetlands shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio per requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. The Plans also must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A permit application has been submitted to RCWD (Permit No. 04 -039, dated March 12, -41- • Engineering Review (box Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • Page 3 December 8, 2004 2004). At the time of this writing, RCWD has determined the application to be Incomplete, pending the receipt of several additional items. All requirements of the RCWD must be met. 4. The Grading Plans shall also specify that all house pads on filled areas shall be designed by a registered Professional Engineer (per geotechnical recommendations) and approved by the City of Lino Lakes. 5. A Certified As -built Survey shall be provided by the Developer's Engineer upon completion of grading, certifying that all grading complies with the Grading Plan. This Certification shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Final certification that the grading meets City requirements for adequate drainage and minimum slopes will be required prior to the issuing of building permits. Percent grades shall be shown on the Plan. 6. Revised drainage calculations and drainage area maps have been received and reviewed. 7. At the following locations on Red Fox Road at approximately Plan Station 4 +00 and Plan Station 13 +00, and on Fox Road at approximately Plan Station 14 +25, the Street Grading Plan shows tipping the street slope in one direction across the street width. This will create some safety and maintenance issues. It is recommended that the street crown typical section be continued through these storm inlet/outlet locations. Most likely this will include the adding of inlet structures and storm piping systems to eliminate potential sheeting and confluence of stormwater runoff at these locations. 8. The plans have been reviewed for conformance with the City of Lino Lakes Storm Water Management Policy. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) recommendations per permit application No. 04 -039 have also been reviewed. Following are some addition general comments regarding grading and drainage: In general, the drainage plan for the proposed development employs five storm water infiltration basins with sediment trap fore bays that are designed to treat the storm water emanating from proposed roadways and adjacent front yards of the proposed housing sites. Comments are as follows: 1) Except for Basin 1 all of these basins drain to the south and southwest into a large wetland complex. Basin 1 drains to the north but the ultimate flow path is unclear. 2) RCWD noted that Lots 1, 2 and 9 Block 5 should "be at or above the adjacent ponding area 100-year-year elevations." It would appear that RCWD is referring to the 100 year elevations in Infiltration Basins 4 and 5. The applicant's. engineer (Plowe Engineering) has indicated that any overflow from these Basins would flow into adjacent wetlands before water backed into the homes on these lots. That may be accurate if the proposed grading plan is not altered for these lots and final grading is performed properly. However, the City's standard requirement of the low floor being 2 feet above the 100 year elevation and 1 foot above the emergency overflow elevation not is not being met at these locations. It is also not known if the low floor elevations meet the minimum City requirements for separation from high ground water levels. Therefore, it is recommended that the house elevations at these locations be adjusted (raised) as required. -42- Engineering Review .ox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 4 December 8, 2004 3) In general, this proposed development will generate a slight increased in runoff rates. This appears to be primarily a result of the RCWD exempting the backyards from stormwater management standards. With the exception of the outflow from basin 1, it would appear that any increases in runoff rates would be inconsequential due to the mitigating affect of the vast area of wetlands receiving the runoff. As stated above, the ultimate flow path for Basin 1 is not known, so it is difficult to make a judgment about increases in runoff from it. In summary, the storm water management features proposed for this development area may be considered adequate once the following items addressed: 1) Assurance that the grading of lots 1, 2 and 9 will be maintained as planned or, failing that, raising the proposed floor elevations to conform with City standards using the 100 -year elevation of basin 4 for lots 1 and 2 and basin 5 for lot 9. 2) The ultimate stormwater outflow destination from basin 1.needs to be determined and evaluated. •treets and Trails 1. Access to this property is proposed from only one location, from Fox Road just east of its intersection with Deerwood Lane. This essentially results in a very large "cul -de -sac" or single point access for the entire Development. The extension of Fox Road through the property considers further extension to the north in the future. However, it is unknown at this time when and if such a second access into the site would happen. Traffic levels of service, safety, and impacts to existing streets and intersections shall be addressed to the City's satisfaction. Comments regarding the Traffic Study are provided further in this report. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for a regional trail linkage between Reshanau Lake Estates and Birch Park in this area. It is recommended that provisions for the trail link be investigated further as part of this Development. 3. The street layout as proposed on the Preliminary Plat appears to attempt to limit impacts to existing wetlands. However, some filling of wetlands is proposed, and mitigation will be required. As previously mentioned, the Plans shall be subject to the review and approval of he Rice Creek Watershed District in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act. 4. Prior to any grading or construction, the street and trail plans shall be further detailed for construction purposes as required by the City of Lino Lakes. This would include typical street sections, pavement sections required, street widths, radii, type of curb, etc. As mentioned in comments under Utilities, a Detail Sheet that includes all applicable City standard plates and additional requirements of the City must be provided. 5. The cul -de -sac at the north end of the subdivision on Fox Road is not the full size per City engineering standard requirements(92' diameter). However, it is recognized that this cul -de -sac may be considered temporary, pending extension of Fox Road to the north at a later date. The cul -de -sac as proposed may therefore be considered acceptable. - 4 3 - Engineering Review Page 5 December 8, 2004 •ox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 6. At least some of the street horizontal curves do not meet the maximum 30 mph speed limit for residential streets. In general, a street centerline radius with crown is a minimum of 300 feet. This is more of a concern where a street is a through street or carries higher volumes of traffic. It is recommended that streets be signed (curves, advisory speed, etc.) as may be needed, consistent with City of Lino Lakes practices. 7. At some locations, the 0.5% minimum street grade does not appear to be attained. 8. The streets shown scale to approximately a 28 -foot wide back -to -back curb; the City's requirement is a 32 -foot back -to -back curb width. The City's minimum requirement for right of way width is 60 feet. Through the PUD process and in obtaining additional open space for the project, the City will allow the road width to be reduced to 28 feet (face of curb to face of curb), and a reduction of the right of way width to 50 feet. However, Fox Road must be constructed to a 32 -foot width from the existing termination point to Red Fox Road, and must be signed "No Parking" on both sides of the street at this location. 9. Cul -de -sacs scale are less than the 92 -foot diameter back -to -back curb which is the City's requirement. "'Utility Plan 1. It is proposed to connect sanitary sewer to an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer stub that extends easterly from the intersection of Fox Road and Deerwood Drive. As stated on the plan, it is recommended that the location and elevation of the stub be field verified. • 2. It is proposed to connect 8 -inch watermain pipe from an existing stub extending from the intersection of Deerwood Drive and Fox Road. It is recommended that the size and location of the stub be verified. 3. Adequate water pressure and circulation into the proposed Development shall be verified by the Developer, as there is no loop or secondary feed available to serve the Development. It is proposed to connect to the City system at an existing 8 -inch diameter stub at the current termination of Fox Road. A Fire Flow Analysis has been provided. The Analysis has been reviewed, and the distribution system proposed is adequate. However, the proposed 6 -inch diameter mains serving the individual cul-de-sacs must be sized to 8- inches per City requirements. 4. The utility plan as submitted shall be considered preliminary for review and not considered a final document for construction purposes. Final utility plans shall include the following: a. Plan and Profile sheets for all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. b. Notes addressing private utilities, and erosion and sedimentation control must be provided on the Utility Plan. c. A note shall be provided on the Utility Plan stating that utility installations shall meet the requirements of the Standard Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) and the City of Lino Lakes. Engineering Review Page 6 December 8, 2004 •ox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • d. Information shall be provided on the Plans showing the location of individual services for sanitary sewer and water, including stationing and elevations. 5. The geotechnical report provided is not specific with regards to addressing the installation of utilities and the streets. It would appear that the soils are generally capable of supporting the proposed infrastructure with some corrections needed in some areas, particularly at low areas where wetlands are intended to be filled, and wet and substandard material may be encountered. The geotechnical report should address this further. In addition, substantial dewatering for utilities may also be necessary in many locations, depending upon the seasonal level of groundwater. 6. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Permit for watermain installation and MPCA/MCES Sanitary Sewer Permit, upon completion of the Utility Plans and prior to construction. 7. The Developer shall provide a televised inspection tape of all sanitary sewer pipes upon completion of the roadway and utilities. Any subsequent cleaning of the sewer pipes after construction shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 8. The number and location of all hydrants and gate valves shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Fire Chief. 9. Trench and roadway compaction shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, including 100% of Standard Proctor Density for the upper three feet directly beneath the roadway, and 95% of Standard Proctor from utility encasement zone to three feet below the surface. As stated in previous reviews, it is critical that geotechnical information and direction be followed as construction activities progresses. It is recommended that a geotechnical investigation be conducted, and that a geotechnical consultant be utilized throughout construction. 10. The Utility Plan is incomplete with regards to storm sewer information, including pipe sizes, materials, slopes, structure elevations and inverts, etc. Details A Detail Sheet must be provided that includes all applicable City of Lino Lakes standard plates. Additional information shall also be included on the Utility Plans and/or the Detail Sheet as follows: Gate Valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C5O0 -61. Valve Boxes shall be Mueller H -10357 with H -10361 drop lid, and extensions shall be Mueller H- 10363. Hydrants shall be Waterous Pacer WB -67 with a bury depth of 8' - 6 ". Services shall be Type "K" copper with Mueller H- 15000 corp stop. Curb stop and curb box shall be Mueller 11-15154 Mark 2 oraseal, and Mueller H -1300 w/Mpls. Top. Storm sewer details and standard plates (including structures and outlets) shall also be provided. •Traffic A Traffic Report for Fox Den Acres has been prepared by TDI, March 2004. The Report was subsequently amended in a TDI Memorandum dated April 14, 2004. The Report was also revised in a Memorandum dated July 29, 2004 to reflect the reduction in the proposed number of residential units from 64 to 57. The -45- Engineering Review Fox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 7 December 8, 2004 report essentially addresses expected impacts to Deerwood Lane, the intersection of Deerwood Lane with County Road 10, and impacts to newly constructed West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street. Regarding the intersection of County Road 10 and Deerwood Lane, the report states that the Level of Service (LOS) of the Deerwood Lane northbound approach currently operates at LOS C and will continue to operate at LOS C under the year 2009 no -build scenario. In summary, the expected traffic impact on access points and the surrounding neighborhood streets is expected to be minimal as a result of added traffic generated by Fox Den Acres. Other Issues In accordance with City requirements, a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted. The Tree Preservation Plan shall be subject to further review and approval of the City. • • Environmental Memo To: Mike Grochala From: Marty Asleson CC: Paul Bengtson Jeff Smyser Date: November 2, 2004 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /October 27, 2004 The Environmental Board made the following recon-imendations at the October 27, 2004 Environmental Board meeting: Fox Den Acres Environmental Board recommended approval of Fox Den Conservation Development including: • Rezoning to residential planned unit development • Preliminary Plat with conditions listed in the P & Z Report • The development of an approved Stewardship Plan • Use of standard Best Management Practices for site development and Natural Resources. Motion by O'Dea to approve, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. • COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY. PLAT NO. 11 Wo ©� 1 K�etory 14 10 ® eFwv +• 3 `r. ►1i� _a4 9 ?mg B Yam 5 • • • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential • ZONING MAP DETAIL • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN WITH GREENWAYS (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 5 2 - • >— E.t.‘, -•••—, z<... ,,, -,-,,.., ,..-.). : ,Q 1:. Q r.tk . '',.. i.,• : '0.) 0 , ...---- , 0. —1 . 0 - : % A) Q '1 \ ••• "1' •-' ..)-E '14----7' .1- _..1, ; \ tz),t..), (;., ''. -i ••• (•,, r ., LJ-Ll 3 k G O ‘ , . „. C,.. -.-......_ - • '-'• • • Olt'''. T:"'...-. . ..,44':.. ',1,. • '1“,,,; • . • . -4,4.. ,-,v. -.; ....... •-i .::•ic,'3,_!., R11 1".',;•-••• .:'-.. i'.. .• '''?-`1'.. -•1'.••: '• 1,;-.. "'. • —4..;,..,..',9'''''.'4.' ' . • "- •‘... • : •,••,..,::•-•,- ' ,....,Y; ..c• -•■••:-.`-i--. .•'-1,‘,..-.' 1. - • ..43 iti.;''' :"Xl.i'..c:i..::-..,:14114r.)..'': :.:, • : ;; •• . . ____ ‘,--'+-.4„,., •r-''',,,...,`,., • ''''''' - .., ' / ;•• s• :::•••4::-. --..... , /.,• Li ..,... „tic) ‘?,... co, \ „,,,., ... ,,,,.....1,;,,,,t, ...„ ,. 1,..,. • . ...-,•,,,. , , ,-' -t. --•,„ ),-4'.4.,,Ag \• &.'..-...Y.f•:':''.. tvi ..e.,--,..- ,::,,,....• r. —,c,„---------.,,,- —r:A4 .01 %-- •-- - •,,-.,-._ ,-.,... 0 4-. ..' (\f•V7:-11 , ., ,,.. • :2! J-`1,c3 ° ,• 6 " • . ?•v.,; • ; -411 \;•.. 1/11 -r-•"•• I • re• •53: , L r .. +/,v f e.$ 1 ^'JO kuo boon , z /ON a Ols E l' gliAzym •\ fr 1 Lr,tSZ 3.LZ,9C.003 • I } )) -� i IA~LL,n:➢ON tt sIn tl � r .x sz,af.oaw `a_ 4 Po r >� - .F.,w.r. I 9. Iz 1 ._r "i a; o^ aae 4s" Ln 00'0IE 09.011 3 ^ZZ,•C005 0 Qf JR W a (y ^egg: • >- 49' j .. (1 ) .-r-' !,1 - 0 o 7t) ,c-.0---7Eff.1_,,,,,:. ,\:,. - --.----3-5.■-Q-__jr ..-,,..'1 t, .. ' .71 nil ilthiffini cL-V. ---- ":-.. ' Q,:q ti,'• v, \ „.. ::., i ° • I l' ,f', :`2f*''';':'::”. ,z;',1;tv''''...)t :: :,....,, ..._ . , ..-.) ---- .,-,'. ' I tv 5■10,•••■ • '-- ■•• 1! I .'r 1.11' — 5 5 - 000 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CC MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6B Paul Bengtson January 10, 2005 Resolution Number 05 -01 Preliminary Plat Vaughan Addition ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Mike Vaughan has requested approval of a five lot single- family residential subdivision entitled Vaughan Addition. As shown on the attached location map, the subject property is located on the south side of Birch Street approximately 2,180 feet east of Ware Road. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density, sewered residential use and it is zoned R -1. The site is also within the existing MUSA. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 6, 2004. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 North School Public / Semi - Public PSP South Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 East Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 West Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density: Gross Site Area Upland Area Total Lots Gross Density Net Density 2.99 acres 2.91 acres 5 1.67 units /acre 1.72 units /acre • • • Vaughan Addition page 2 The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and within the existing MUSA boundary. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are stubbed to the site from the Birch Street right -of -way. The proposed design fits within the Low Density range of up to three units per acre. Growth Management: MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The subject site is already within the current MUSA boundary. Growth Management. Units /Year: As seen in the table at the end of this report, 165 lots have been approved for year 2005. The recent ordinance amendment to the growth management policy has eliminated the City Council's ability to allow 20% more discretionary lots over the 147 -lot maximum per year in the future. However, as was discussed when this ordinance was adopted, the projects that were already in the approval process could still be considered for the remaining 11 discretionary lots for calendar year 2005. PRELIMINARY PLAT Lots: The proposed subdivision will consist of five lots, ranging in size from 11,654 square feet to 19,665 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district is 10,800 square feet of upland area. The upland lot area of all lots exceed 11,654 square feet and therefore conform to the ordinance. Access and Circulation: Access from Birch Street is proposed in the form of a cul- de -sac, with an offset bulb. This will actually eliminate a current access point from the property. Staff worked with the applicant to try and identify a layout that would allow the extension of a stub street for the property to the west, but after many attempts, it was determined that the site has too many factors working against an extension. These factors include the existing grade separation between the subject site and Birch Street, the number of preservation worthy trees on the site, the location of the existing house on the property to the west, and the depth of the subject site. Utilities: City water and sanitary sewer service will connect to existing facilities already on site. Both are adequate to serve the project. Grading and Stormwater Management: The city engineer has completed a thorough review of the submitted plans and his comments are attached. The applicant will be required to satisfy all of these comments prior to approval of any building permits for the site. The applicant has submitted an exhibit that clearly shows the proposed ponding will not occur within the required 50 -foot setback from the existing wells on the properties to the south. • • • Vaughan Addition page 3 Parks, Open Space: The proposal does not include any land dedication for parkland, only a cash dedication will be required. Park dedication fees will be calculated as required by city policy. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 27, 2004. The recommendations are attached. The comments that are still relevant will be addressed by the development agreement between the applicant and the city. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Planning and Zoning Board approved this item, subject to the seven conditions listed below, at their December 8, 2004 regular meeting. This item was originally scheduled for the November 10, 2004 meeting and was continued to the December 8, 2004 meeting to allow staff and the developer to continue working out some outstanding issues. OPTIONS 1. Approve the project. 2. Deny the project. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that this item be approved subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along Birch Street on the final plat. 2. The project must apply for a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to final approval by the City Council. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 4. The project must obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work in the Birch Street right -of -way. 5. Park dedication fee shall be paid according to city policy. 6. Existing buildings on the site shall be removed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Vaughan Addition Preliminary Plat packet submitted October 26, 2004; revised December 23, 2004. 3. Environmental Board comments dated November 2, 2004 4. City Engineers comments dated January 4, 2005 • • • J 0 CD O O O O O O O O N LOTS /UNITS T [0 C E 0) a O 249 r r 56 Cr) r N r r r N N N CO r to r N N N CO Cr) M Co) M V" 32 r N N CO CO 51 N 18 CO CO r LC) r ti P r o 0 0 r V' N ti T tNC) CO r O CO N N `— `— CO et T N.- tf) T t() 103 0 249 r 0 c') 152 N 0 r r "I' N 10 N 18 CO r In ',"— N N ..1..r.• ..... ,.. r.. 1_._. _._ [Stoneybrook 2nd Addn O z E co 11 (Keefe:'Drel plat. not final plat _a . N - O C E = O O O T C (p IHalev Manor (10 new lots) I Cove Millers Crossroads Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve rshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex IRice Church: Oakwood View C -6 'D ¢ Co C hland Meadows East 2nd Marshan Townhomes 2nd (Pheasant Hills 12th island Shadow Ponds 2nd Add an Addition Annie's Acres (1 new) Marshan Meadows Marshan Lakeview (2 new) total a) a) a O n '- C N C . . ): O a - 5 9 - • • • Memorandum DATE: January 4, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Vaughan Addition Attached is the TKDA review dated January 4, 2005, of the submitted documents for the Vaughan Addition site. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, " 6 0 "ekes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651- 982 -2410 • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Vaughan Addition Copies To: From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: January 4, 2005 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 fax www.tkda.com City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 13265 -002 Routing: Revised plans have been submitted providing for a single family residential development titled Vaughan Addition. The proposed development essentially provides for the construction of 5 single family homes on 3 acres of property. The property is located along the south side of Birch Street between Tomahawk Trail and West Shadow Drive, or directly across Birch Street from Rice Lake Elementary School. Access to the 5 units would be provided by the construction of a short cul -de -sac that would extend from Birch Street. The following documents have been received for review: 1. Full size and half size plan sheets prepared by Loucks Associates received by the City of Lino Lakes December 23, 2004 as follows: Site Plan (C2 -1), Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control (C3 -1), and Right Turn Lane (C2 -2). 2. Hydrologic Calculations, submitted by Loucks Associates and received by the City of Lino Lakes December 23, 2004. The following comments are provided.: Grading, Drainage, and Drainage Calculations 1. The revised drainage calculations are currently under further review. The calculations are based on the assumption that all hard surface areas (Area 4S, which includes all houses, driveways, and streets), will all be directed to Pond 7P, which may not be possible unless all roof drains are discharged directly to the driveways at the front of every house, which may be difficult. The Developer must demonstrate that no additional runoff beyond the existing runoff rate may be discharged from the site, especially along the west boundary of the property. Flood elevations for the adjacent wetlands must be shown on the grading plan. 3. The types of housing units are all shown as full basement walls outs, and floor elevations are provided. An emergency overflow location and elevation of 895.0 is also identified on the plan. All housing units • must meet the City's minimum requirements as follows: The lowest floor must be a minimum of 2 feet above the adjacent 100 -year pond/flood levels, 4 feet above normal pond and ground water levels, and the lowest opening must be at least 1 foot above the nearest emergency overflow elevation. Based upon An Employee Owned Compani _ 61 _7 Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Vaughan Addition Page 2 January 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota the information provided, the 4 foot requirement above the normal pond elevation is not attained for Lot 2 and Lot 3. In addition, a geotechnical report has not been provided, and specific groundwater elevations are therefore unknown as well. 4. A copy of the NPDES Application and permit shall be provided to the City. 5. The site area is Less than 5 acres. Review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District is therefore not required. Utilities No revised utility plans have been received as part of this review submittal. However, previous comments regarding the utilities remain applicable as follows: 1. Existing sewer (8 -inch diameter) and water (6 -inch diameter) currently extend to the site from the north side of birch Street and are adequate to serve the site. Further extension of the water main in order to serve the properties must be 8 -inch main in accordance with City standards. 2. Individual water and sewer services must meet minimum cover requirements, especially in the street and paved areas. Insulation shall be required wherever the minimum amount of cover (8 feet) cannot be attained. 3. In addition to the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, all sewer and water facilities must be furnished and installed per the requirements of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Minnesota Department of Health. 4. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 5. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. Other Comments 1. A tree preservation plan was previously submitted. A final landscaping plan shall eventually be submitted. Sight corner visibilities shall be maintained per City and County requirements as applicable (see below). 2. Any existing well and septic locations on both the subject property and adjoining properties shall be confirmed to assure compliance with the Minnesota Department Health (MDH). This shall mean that any existing facilities on the subject property shall be removed or capped in accordance with regulations, and that sewer separation distances from any remaining facilities in close proximity shall be attained in accordance with MDH. Separation distances from wells identified on neighboring properties are provided on the plan. Vaughan Addition Page 3 January 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 3. The plan provides notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment for disturbed areas. However, the City of Lino Lakes has a specific seed specification for ponding areas and a note referring to City of Lino Lakes seeding specifications shall also be provided on the plan. 4. Approval of the plat, including street access from County. Road 10 (Birch Street) will be subject to the review and approval of Anoka County. Anoka County has provided review comments in a letter dated December 2, 2004. Among the County's comments are as follows: a) No additional right of way dedication is being required by the County. b) The County is requiring that a right turn lane (East Bound) be constructed up to the new street Vaughan Court). The cost to design and construct the right turn lane shall be at the developer's expense. The length of the turn lane and taper appears to meet the conditions of Anoka County as stated in their December 2 letter. However the County will have specific pavement section (thickness) and bituminous mix requirements that must be provided on the plans. Specific requirements for traffic control during construction will also be required by the County, and provisions must be provided for on the plans. Any additional conditions and requirements of the County must also be provided as specified or as conditioned as part of the County's permit process. c) As stated in the previous review comments, the County also suggests that a roadway /street easement be provided that would allow for a future extension of Vaughan Street directly to the west. d) The County has stated that the proposed Vaughan Street construction appears that it would result in severe restrictions in intersection sight distances, especially with regards to trees and brush. Clearing and grading of vegetation will be required by the County in order to allow for construction of the street. Other sight distance requirements and conditions of the County must be addressed as may be required by the County. e) Drainage calculations and grading and erosion control plans must be forwarded to the County. f) Noise impacts must be addressed by the developer to the satisfaction of the County. Construction of the street entryway must also meet County requirements for amilatv}'1. •!ng of the bicycle path with the new street/curb, including the construction of concrete pedestrian ramps as required by the County. 5. A geotechnical report has not been provided. Therefore, the existing soils and groundwater levels are not known. All building pad foundations, streets, and utilities shall be constructed on approved materials as required by the City of Lino Lakes, and groundwater levels shall be known in order to ascertain building elevation requirements. 6. Wetlands shall be delineated prior to any site grading. Vaughan Addition Page 4 January 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 7. Standard drainage and utility easements along all property lines (5 feet and 10 feet) are shown in addition to other easements required for utility lines, stormwater detention areas, wetlands, etc. However, some rear property line easements need to be adjusted from 5 feet to 10 feet. • Environmental Memo To: Mike Grochala From: Marty Asieson CC: Paul Bengtson Jeff Smyser Date: November 2, 2004 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /October 27, 2004 The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at the October 27, 2004 Environmental Board meeting: Fox Den Acres Environmental Board recommended approval of Fox Den Conservation Development including: • Rezoning to residential planned unit development • Preliminary Plat with conditions listed in the P & Z Report The development of an approved Stewardship Plan • Use of standard Best Management Practices for site development and Natural Resources. Motion by O'Dea to approve, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. • • Amendment to the Growth Management Ordinance Motion to approve the changes to the Growth Management Ordinance by Smith, second by O'Dea. All were in favor. Motion passed. Mike Vaughan Subdivision The Environmental Board recommended the approval of the Mike Vaughan Subdivision proposal with the following comments and recommendations: • Save as many trees as possible • Mitigate any oak wilt started on the site • The rain gardens should use the City Native Seed Mix, and the developer should hire a nurseryman experienced in native plant establishment to plant and manage this area for at least 3 years. • Under the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Notes of the proposal, !tern 2 should say that 4 inches of topsoil will be thoroughly tilled into the soil • The notes should include a statement that "no soil shall be imported or exported from the site with out City approval • Under the Stormwater Prevention Plan Notes of the proposed plan, their should include a statement that the City will be notified when storm water must be treated with alternative BMPs and agree to them • Under the notes section of the proposed plan, the note on external washing of construction vehicles should include the washing of internal components of cement trucks and be limited to a defined area • An additional stockpiling of rock should be on hand, on the site to top dress rock entrances should existing rock entrances become filled up • The ponds should be dug with minimum compaction equipment and fenced off to further traffic during construction. • The notes should indicate that the site soils will be restored to pre - construction densities and that this would be accomplished by tilling, plowing, disking, or ripping. • The Developer should provide adequate landscape screening to adjacent residences. This screening if in rain garden and treatment pond areas should be appropriate for these areas. The screening and recommended 1 boulevard tree per house frontage should be approved by the City. • Have Staff look at the feasibility of an alternative to a cul- de-sac design • • Establish a mechanism for a no -mow buffer around wet areas that can be enforceable. Post signage for these areas. Motion to approve with comments and recommendations by Grundhoffer, second by O'Connel. All were in favor. Motion passed. Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses The Environmental Board recommended that this project be referred back to staff for further review, and come back to the Environmental Board at a later time. Issues include: • Submittal of a lighting fixture plan to include any sign monuments. Demonstrate that Tight glare would not be seen from the lake. • Discuss a lighting and sound time limit for the site use • Septic system feasibility and possible relocation to the front of the building and away from the lake and water treatment areas and agreement to hook up to sewer and water when available. Have a recommendation from County Environmental on the proposed system • Discussion of a way to protect a significant area on the lake side of the project through a conservation easement or other mechanism • Adequately address screening needs of shoreland and adjacent residences. Establish proposed changes to species and discuss save areas with City. Redesign to ensure adequate screening in sight lines to adjacent houses. Show ground story cover on site to include a plan to irrigate sod areas. Agree to use of native plants in drainage and water treatment areas. Use City Seed Specs. • Look at alternative design to NURP. Design to a more appropriate rain garden. Include rain garden areas for water coming off parking lots and other treatment features like grassy swaies, to larger rain pond treatment area. Include pervious parking if possible. Motion by O'Dea, second by Bauman, to refer back to staff for further review.. All were in favor. [Notion passed. Friends of the Mississippi Storm Water Management Ordinance Review Recommendation to move forward with this project. Motion by O'dca, second by Bor. All approved. Motion passed. Friends of the Mississippi River Water Quality Workshop Recommend moving forward with the workshop. Motion by Smith, second by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 3 - 6 7 - • • Appointments to the AUAR Advisory Panel The Environmental Board elected to have the following Environmental Board members on the Advisory Panel: 1. Terri O'Connell /alternative 2. Dennis Smith 3. Barbara Bor 4. Barbara Bauman Motion to Approve by O'Dea, second by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. Motion passed. Hardwood Creek Rehabilitation Project The Environmental Board was in favor of a Council Resolution supporting the best environmental option for the rehabilitation of Judicial Ditch 2/Hardwood Creek. r Page 4 - 6 8 - 8 !I I J1 COVER SHEET Z U J 2 somu+zi..1. 4 1 1H1.# tl ;r 00- 4aie6i'tt4fdefeU 1 IN'I 1 III n n u III n u I I 11111 w O 0 0 > SHEET INDEX • GENERAL NOTES 1 i 3 a E E A d o§ 0 0 > 111 11i_ .11 I I ti 111 alalda#, El; ING CONDITIONS somp4,0..r 4 11..411411 # fll citil I Illi; ;Ili .1111101!1 'lit ItOli ililliflilligiliitlilliliii ;1111111ii to 0 .., o 111J CD < ...1 chi > 0 ra...., w 0 6 14, • .2, \fs) I, I ';,:„.■1 voi'm \ sCit wrr h.1 'CP \ r, , . ,..t5 to 1 7 :;41.7; ''......; ,..' 4.' 4 1' ', '`,..01'./ ,r,;').4.J, .,,.. ,-- „- .z..,.G.6:". °Ica tv , I-1, ids :q / X....zr„. , • • t-,-.-' 1/4-0 Vb AD/ ,.// -4---7:-, , -.069 fl) t hhh h .1..) v'st> 1-14 • :./11, a 1 ;67,, Z - 5 kii.)111 11 lj ,Y1 1 ;I-11 Will DWI), o hi .3 1 141 3 1 1 1 1 1 i 11 1111 • • r2. 25 ' a Y ''--- "N 7 • . '' . ' - - - ' - - 7... • 7- - -.- - -..."j: PC .9 N J S 0 —.---.\ 1 T z..... C34, (1' ls ., C) - t.,- ;...:3........3 •,. 0 0 0 c. CITY OF L1140 LAKES . I \ \ k NOLd3OX3 0 „ CX)nr” 7-1 \ • i 11 1 h <:\ • Ot t; 5- 1 If \cak `X 0 \ , ifsnoo av)P9rir-A-, 6 8 .31 VW, 04'64'k NOti100r 3J0 IMP C.) mown. N.JJI 00 0 5'., I. 1 1tli 111" \ 1 1 li 1 o.v.xl..■ 4 z 8 „1111111°1011 1 ,. 31 111Dillig I 1 E°'111 I- 141E.I'!11 1 1111 HIT HIM • ANON:A COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT NO. 11 z is t nvi r 1040 11144 ' 11 til Pi A i 1 ai i 41! 2111 Crj 0 till 111 I !Hi ,Ii ''' 0 z oflh 3 Ekig 0312 Elk I II CITY OF LI4 O LAKES Y = F y f 6 0 i 111 h y l r e i[ i i ! r t t! ; iipli FFi;i111111 -II -104! III 1111 'Il I „1111 fi m 5 E :I i a - ANOKA COO, Ail 9 op /. --- —r - -- tr bee„: 41 t Sz 6s i Q tho _ .- _� -� -�i •rte a rn a C.) RECEIVED DEC 2 a 2004 CITY 01' LI M LAKES S 6i 5n 8 1 j in_ }- - -- .� aroma I f3 C�V f�i . t f3*!. 0 0 0 NOLtd3DX3 '1 4b*� W'+ 0 / Tl STREET m kr 1 „eti .ax ■ ( E 1 ' n a 1 Lk i 1� J &30/11 NO1L/COV —74— u .i Z� 1 1 0 441 H. 1illhciii ,.l 0111 z 0 6 o tll� 111 'If ° €kF ;F$;zel°�&�lil:i9���Ei ¢ 6 ioc i- orinOkF P9lH� .G[ 1I I 11 ®141! • Ca CA o UA N efa rd 63 ✓ 1.-- 24 cm 6: zz <0 1 a 1 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN /I fific!gi 11110101!1; 'i ;0;0" 1 III"Ii11111 5 '"1111,1 ' I 0111 1111 d VIS • CSAIL NO. 10 • .71 5, a ■ L -I .417:41,C171,'Y W TIM y o_ lf•P l M� 4t'jj T to Ea• e0 c 1 ill c3 0 • o as � E E e•,; Z pi _ ▪ T. - W- i� :i::11... FHpe C Z o_Z C __ a 6 6 ppK F. J r ¢W p CY W s f � 0 z ors Risf • '0 p111. O • I 0 0 0 SURVEY LEGEND - 1 Hziaaz5e1EA11 _ tl RICO ecoaotFr308 0 ` —aen s[av:n v'.a 4^ —�• 1 .9..005 xl- C --i�'. • • leVir '44 { E G IffiI 1 + 1 Saf a. L F f I b MAP • P qMOW to 11-i W rz se Fu I k84: fig$ „wk L bytraIr 1 t 15 ttpire07125 us sr rn ;an Nil //!1x353 aLSrfag_, — 7 7 — W a U 0 F S S 0 a • • 3 1 0 W E E >. vzgS =sE $ alelajaasaa==_ �L UTILITY DETAILS 116 B 16 BITUMINOUS 1 1 5151 !il$ eic 1 4 e§ _ _ k ' p � i:!i u 5 d Fp-■' 6c x .. z C J seone o 14 i oboe d Fill I Le§ — Ei4T "^ s; 1 1 5151 !il$ eic 1 4 e§ `opl iii t3§ g @i °^ l BCE Le§ — Ei4T "^ s; E d y�:1 Nil a 6116 11 d a l' 16 B l `. a 1€ 117e 7 ea llp 6 d J� FC lee aS Cei hi ye e '{ /E i 61 VVNdd ,A.L.k li Ti in i e r 1 T h ..F 0 t,F E toy II §e� § • 1111151151151511111111 g p E'y iS @_@Bg liifEa :. rf g i £a §§ pp m I�f:� I f "^ s; E d y�:1 Nil a 6116 11 d a l' 16 B l `. a 1€ 117e 7 ea llp 6 d J� FC lee aS Cei hi ye e of 1 lit • ! 's OP fif z ;i15Bniii1111 6 LI Et 1 8 3 • • isZ z hiar-gd ;Z:‘Etozis alilligi rk;;.EgE51,1 T -• • Yt9te.- •,„ ••• P"! „eh , • 0,Isy — • cs1 CC .55 •,;„ • Ce3t,'kt3 ; 7, -•'tt3 . ‘• „:'03 .:;•••e V.3- FL 1.) - • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 10, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing Soil Borings for the construction of Well No. 5. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Water System Comprehensive Plan, construction of Well No. 5 identified Birch Park as a proposed location. The proposed site at Outlot F in the D. Erickson 2nd Addition (across from the park) doesn't meet the Minnesota Department of Health requirement that the City own the land within 50' of the well. The adjacent property owner to the south is unwilling at this time to sell any property to the City. The City still wants to pursue this location as a future well location. City staff has reviewed the Birch Park area and did not find a location that would not impact the aesthetics or function of the park. City staff did identify an alternative location at Captain's Place within the Lakes Addition area. Following City Council direction, City staff has performed additional review for possible Well No. 5 sites. The only City owned property in the area is Birch Park and Captain's Place. Any other possible locations would have to be acquired which would push back the timeframe of the well and add additional costs. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation to use the Captain's Place site. A location map is attached and the front of the building is marked at the site. This site has been reviewed with the Health Department and found to be suitable while meeting flood plain and utility setback requirements. Also, a raw water fine already exists in Black Duck Drive for future treatment of the City's system. Locating Well No. 5 would minimize costs associated with any future treatment of the water system. No additional traffic activity would occur on Black Duck Drive because Well No. 1 located the r r+:s.. staff would be ��_ to both wells at the is located on U Ie same road. City stal I would be able to service oth wells at the same time. The City's existing wells are located in residential neighborhoods. Any new well can be constructed to simulate a residential home and /or garage. The noise levels associated with the wells are extremely low. A person would have to stand close to the building to hear any noise. The recommended size of the building in this location is 20 feet by 22 feet without providing any additional storage area. This would allow the chemical treatment to take place at Well No. 5. If the chemical treatment doesn't occur at the site, then additional water main would have to be extended from Black Duck Drive to Well No. 3 and Well No. 3 would require building improvements with structural expansion. _81_ City staff is recommending that the soil borings that are typically done during the pumphouse design phase be performed at this time due to the proximity of the site to the flood plain. It is staffs recommendation to authorize the soil borings in the amount of $5,000.00 for the construction of Well No. 5. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing the Soil Borings for the construction of Well No. 5. 2. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 04 -199 be adopted. • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -199 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SOIL BORINGS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WELL NO. 5. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Council adopting the Comprehensive Water System Plan on April 26, 2004, with reference to the first phases of improvement by constructing Well No. 5; and WHEREAS, the report provides information showing the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible; and WHEREAS, the City's Engineer, TKDA, shall perform such services; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to use Trunk Area & Unit funds for all of the cost of the improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Y OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of Well No. 5. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of January, 2005. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Legend Lift Station City Owned Watermain Source: Various State, County, and Local Enti ies CITY OF LINO LAKES PROPOSED WELL NO 5 0 200 400 Feet FIGURE A LOCATION MAP - 8 4 - 13089 -01 • AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 10, 2005 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -201 Approving modification of Tax increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes approved TIF District No. 1 -11 on November 24, 2003. The establishment of this 25 -year Redevelopment District was intended to provide a source of revenue for development of the city's downtown area, known as Woods Edge, and is comprised mainly of the Arctic Sandblasting site and the Tagg home. Because of some minor adjustment to the site plan for Woods Edge, the Tagg home site (PIN 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005) is now a part of the YMCA site and no longer a part of the Woods Edge Planned Unit Development The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority approved a modification of the TIF Plan to remove the parcel. This resolution removes the Tagg home parcel from the district. Elimination of the parcel and delay in certification do not materially change the impacts and TIF estimates in the plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04-201. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 04 -201 2. Modified TIF Plan for District 1 -11 • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -201 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -11 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -11 approved November 24, 2003, the Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") for the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan ") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 (the "TIF District "), pursuant to and in confoimity with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1081 (the "EDA Act ") and Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "TIF Act "); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -209 approved November 24, 2003, the City Council of the City, after a duly notice public hearing, approved the Plan for the TIF District; and WHEREAS, since that time the City and Authority have diligently worked to negotiate a development agreement regarding the TIF District, and determined to postpone filing the TIF District for certification pending completion of such negotiations; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2004, the City and Authority each approved a Contract for Private Development between the City, Authority and Legacy Holdings /Lino Lakes LLC (the "Contract "); and WHEREAS, in reviewing the development contemplated in the Contract, the Authority has determined that Parcel No. 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 (the "Parcel ") should be eliminated from the TIF District; and WHEREAS, under Section 469.175, subd. 4 of the TIF Act, the Authority may modify the Plan for the TIF District without the notice and hearings required for a new district, if the only change is to eliminate parcels from the TIF District, and the current net tax capacity of those parcels equals for exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the district's original net tax capacity; and WHEREAS, the TIF District has not yet been filed for certification, but the City expects to file for certification by the end of December, 2004, in which event the original net tax capacity for all parcels in the TIF District will be the tax capacity as of January 2, 2004 (for taxes payable in 2005); and • WHEREAS, the Parcel to be eliminated does not yet have an original net tax capacity, so at the time the TIF District is filed for certification, the boundaries of the district will exclude the Parcel; and WHEREAS, the Authority has determined to modify the Plan, prior to filing for certification, in order to eliminate the Parcel; and WHEREAS, elimination of the Parcel does not affect or impair the findings made by the City Council, upon approval of the Plan, that the TIF District is a redevelopment district under the TIF Act; and WHEREAS, the Authority has approved the modified Plan and recommended approval by this Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes as follows: 1. The administrative modification to the Plan, eliminating the Parcel, is hereby approved in substantially the form on file in City Hall. 2. The Community Development Director is authorized to forward a copy of the modified Plan to the Department of Revenue pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, subd.4a. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Plan to Anoka County and request that the Auditor certify the original tax capacity of the TIF District, as modified, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177. DATED: January 10, 2005 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 (Legacy at Woods Edge Project) Dated: November 24, 2003 Original Approved: December 10, 2003 Administrative Modification Approved: December 15, 2004 Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 E. Seventh Place, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55101 -2887 (651) 223 -3000 • • INTRODUCTION The purpose of the administrative modification is to remove one parcel from the existing Tax Increment Financing District. The parcel is 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 and is shown in Section G. No other changes have been made to the original TIF Plan. • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pace(s) A. Definitions 1 B. Statutory Authorization 1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose 1 D. Statement of Objectives 2 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District 2 F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule 3 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District 4 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District 5 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District 5 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing 5 K. Estimated Public Costs 7 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue 7 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 8 N. Original Net Tax Capacity 8 O. Original Tax Capacity Rate 9 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment 9 Q. Use of Tax Increment 10 R. Excess Tax Increment 10 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule 11 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses 11 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule 12 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 12 W. Prior Planned Improvements 12 X. Development Agreements 13 Y. Assessment Agreements 13 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Ran 13 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 13 AB. Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements 14 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District EXHIBIT I Assumptions Report EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report EXHIBIT V • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority. "City" means the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality ". "City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the "Governing Body ". "County" means Anoka County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Municipal Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding Development Program. "Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District. "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Development District. "School District" means independent School District No. 831, Minnesota. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11. "TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document). Section B Statutory Authorization The Development District Act authorizes the City and Authority, upon certain public purpose findings by the City Council, to establish and designate development districts within the City and to develop and administer development programs therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public purposes specified in Section C. In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District Act, the City Council and Authority have established the Development District comprising the area described in Section E and have adopted this Development Program. The TIF Act also authorizes the Authority, with approval by the City, to establish and administer tax increment financing districts within the Development District. Eligible public costs of the Development District and TIF District may be paid for tax increments collected from the TIF District. Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose The City Council and Authority have determined that there is a need for the City to take certain actions they deem necessary in order to encourage, ensure and facilitate development and redevelopment by the private sector of underutilized, inappropriately used and unused land located within the corporate limits of the City. Such actions are necessary in order to provide additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and the surrounding area; to improve the tax base of the City, the County and the School District, thereby enabling them to SPKINGSTED Page 1 -91- • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota better provide needed public services; and to improve the general economy of the City, the County and the State. Section D Statement of Objectives The Authority seeks to achieve the following objectives through the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -11; 1. redevelop blighted areas as identified 2. provide employment and mixed housing opportunities within the community. 3. improve the tax base of Lino Lakes and the general economy of the City and State; 4. implement relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Authority's specific purpose in establishing TIF District No. 1 -11 is to aid in the creation of a mixed use project consisting of lifecycle housing including townhomes, apartments, condos, and senior housing and commercial space. The project will consist of 161 owner - occupied housing units, 147 rental housing units, and approximately 153,200 square feet of commercial space. The Authority intends to use increment generated by the new developments to write down land costs and the cost of special assessments, including the interest portion, site improvements, streets, public utilities, and for public improvements to Lake Drive. Section E Designation of Tax increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District • Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district: • (1) parcels comprising at least 70% of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed "occupied" if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots; or other similar structures. (2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad right - of -ways; or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 1150.02, subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: (1) (2) (3) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; are located adjacent to rail facilities; and have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used; or (4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in section 469.174, subdivision 10b. For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions listed above, as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole. SPRINGSTED Page 2 -92- • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in (1) above. The supporting facts and documentation for this determination will be retained by the Authority for the life of the TIF District and are available to the public upon request. "Structurally substandard" is defined as buildings containing defects or deficiencies in structural elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection (including egress), layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type. A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence includes recent fire or police inspections, on- site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained. A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building if the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district; (2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the authority, or was performed by a developer under a development agreement with the authority, the authority found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was structurally substandard and that the authority intended to include the parcel in the TIF district, and (4) the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district. (3) In the case of (4) above, the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of (a) the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s) for the current year. At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the authority may be included in the qualifying costs. [M.S. Section 469.176, Section F Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt by the Authority of the first tax increment. Modifications of this plan (see Section Z) shall not extend these limitations. SPRINGSTED Page 3 -93- • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The Authority reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be through the year 2031), but anticipates that the TIF District will be decertified prior to that time (see Section P). All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the Authority. In addition, no tax increments shall be paid to the Authority from the TIF District after three years from the date of certification unless within that time period: (1) bonds have been issued in aid of the Project Area (except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S. Sections 469.152 to 469.165); (2) the Authority has acquired property within the TIF District; or (3) the Authority has constructed public improvements within the TIF District. Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District The TIF District is a 50 acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described below: Parcel ID Number Legal Description 17- 31 -22 -12 -0002 17 31 22 12 0005 17- 31 -22 -21 -0020 17- 31 -22 -21 -0021 THAT PRT OF N1/2 OF NE1 /4 OF SEC 17 T31 R22 LYG SELY OF 1 35W; EX E 920 FT THERE OF; ALSO EX S 180 FT OF W 1210 FT OF SD N1/2 OF NE1 /4 SUBJ TO EASE OF REC. THE N 60 FT OF S 180 FT OF E 100 FT OF W 1210 FT OF NW1 /4 OF NE1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22, EX RD, S>J-B� TO EASE OF REC. THAT PRT OF E1/2 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM AT INTER OF ELY R/W LINE OF T H NO 49 & S LINE OF SD E112, TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD ELY R/W LINE 1271.78 FT TO POB, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 524.62 FT +OR- TO E LINE OF SD E1/2, TH N 0 DEG 4 MIN E ALG SD E LINE 537.94 FT +OR- TO INTER /W FOL DESC LINE: COM AT INTER OF C/L OF T H NO 49 & S LINE OF SD E113, TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD C/L 1778.6 FT, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 40 FT TO ELY R/W LINE OF SD RD & POB OF SD E1 /2 & SD LINE THERE TERM, TH N 65 DEG 4 MIN E 295 FT +OR- TO SD ELY R/W LINE, TH S 24 DEG 56 MIN W ALG SD ELY R/W LINE 487.92 FT +OR- TO POB, EX PRT PLATTED AS THE VILLAGE NO 1, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC THAT PRT OF NE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM SPRINGSTED Page 4 - 94 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota AT INTER OF C/L OF T H NO 8 & S LINE OF SD NW1 /4 TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD C/L 1778.6 FT, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 40 FT TO ELY R/W LINE OF SD RD & POB, TH CONT S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 295 FT +OR- TO E LINE OF SD 1/4 1/4, TH N ALG SD E LINE 187.47 FT, TH N 65 DEG 4 MIN W 220 FT TO E R/W LINE OF SD RD, TH S 24 DEG 56 MIN W ALG SD R/W LINE 170 FT TO POB, EX PRT PLATTED AS THE VILLAGE NO 1, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC. The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right -of -ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above, and those shown in the map attached as Exhibit I. Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The Authority may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District or reimburse the developer for acquisition of that property. Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The proposed development will consist of a large mixed use project. Major components include lifecycle housing with townhomes, apartments, condos, workforce and senior housing. Also expected to be included in the project are commercial pad sites. The project will be built in phases beginning in 2004 and ending in 2010. Commercial, rental and owner - occupied housing would be under construction simultaneously. Tax increment will be used to finance a portion of the redevelopment and construction costs. The project is expected to be fully constructed in 2010 and be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2011 for taxes payable in 2012. The project is proposed to be completed in phases over a 7 year period. At the time this document was prepared there were no signed development contracts with regards to the above described development. Section .i Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district; A building condition assessment was completed by SEH in the fall of 2003 for the proposed site. The report found that parcels consisting of 100% of the area are occupied and 100% of the buildings are structurally substandard. See the summary of the substandard qualifications in Appendix A. SPRINGSTED Page 5 -95- • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan; The proposed development is a mixed use project consisting of commercial, owner- occupied and rental housing in Lino Lakes. The properties in the TIF District have been dilapidated for several years, despite previous efforts by the Authority to encourage its development. The Authority has been trying since 1998 to find a suitable developer for the site. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: As noted above, the site has been blighted for many years. The area is not serviced by public water and sewer. Without installation of the improvements needed to serve the area, the Authority has no reason to expect that significant redevelopment would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan. Several environmental conditions exist Therefore, the Authority concludes as follows: a. The city's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0, except for a small amount attributable to appreciation in land value. b. If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the District, the total increase in market value would be approximately $72,222,325. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $14,092,793. (See Exhibit V) d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Authority finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $58,129,532 (the amount in clause b Tess the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the developer has represented to the Authority that it would not undertake the proposed development without the assistance of tax increment financing. Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within the Project Area. . A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been SPRINGSTED Page 6 - 9 6 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit V. This analysis indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned, and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning and Zoning Board and will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area. (5) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(a) (see method (b) in Section P). Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District. Land /building acquisition 4,200,000 Site improvements /preparation costs 3,500,000 Installation of public utilities 2,145,000 Streets and sidewalks 2,500,000 Interest reduction payments 0 Bond principal payments 0 Bond interest payments 0 Special assessments 3,178,000 Special assessment interest 2,000,000 Administrative expenses 2,571,000 Capitalized interest 2,500,000 Road improvements outside district 3,856,000 Total 26,450.000 The Authority anticipates using a portion of tax increment to repay the City for special assessments including interest at 7% and for public improvements outside the TIF District but within the project area. The Authority reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. SPRINGSTED Page 7 - 9 7 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax increment revenue 25,708,000 Interest on invested funds 292,000 Bond proceeds 0 Loan proceeds 0 Real estate sales 0 Special assessments 0 Rent /lease revenue 0 Grants 450.000 Total 26,450.000 The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay -as- you -go technique. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be distributed to the developer /owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K). The Authority reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay - as- you -go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The Authority also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The Authority does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District, but reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,335,000. Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year. The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2003, for taxes payable in 2004, is $880,600. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent reclassification of property, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will be approximately $10,345. Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax - exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; SPRINGSTED Page 8 - 9 8 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or (4) changes in property classification rates. Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for taxes levied in 2003 and payable in 2004, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2002 and payable in 2003, is 116.924% as shown below. Taxing Jurisdiction 2002/2003 Local Tax Rate City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714% ISD 831 24.557% Other 7.050% Total 116.924% Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A, the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either (a) be determined before the application of fiscal disparity or (b) exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was certified) times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the Authority elects shall remain the same for the life of the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method (a) to method (b) above. The Authority elects method (b). The County Auditor shall certify to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The Authority may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the Authority's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 9 - 9 9 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit 111 which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S. Section 469.175, Subdivision 1 a; or return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. (3) (5) Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary. SPRINGSTED Page 10 - 1 0 0 - • • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section R Excess Tax Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to: prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule At least 75% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 25% of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area, except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after certification of the district; (2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five -year period or a reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund. used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the district; or (3) (4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within five years from certification of the district. Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 75% of the tax increments must be used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF District must be decertified. The Authority anticipates that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (including the allowable administrative expenses)and reserves the right to allow for maximum tax increment pooling from the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 11 - 101 - • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than: (1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; (3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project; (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178; or (5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause (1) to (3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project. • Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule • If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated impact on Other Taxing jurisdictions Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. SPRINGSTED Page 12 - 1 0 2 - • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section W Prior Planned Improvements The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the Authority must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the Authority should the development not be completed. The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property located within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The Authority may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District. The Authority anticipates entering into an assessment agreement. Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and SPRINGSTED Page 13 - 10 3 - City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the Authority agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The Authority shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of and and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1, the Authority shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. (3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax - exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply; the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; if laws governing the classification of real property cause chances to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity (b) (c) SPRINGSTED Page 14 - 104 - City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section AB Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The State Auditor shall enforce the provisions of the TIF Act and shall have full responsibility for financial and compliance auditing of the Authority's use of tax increment financing. On or before August 1 of each year, the Authority must annually submit to the State Auditor, County Auditor and to the governing body of the municipality a report which shall: provide full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in the TIF District; permit comparison and reconciliation of the accounts and financial reports; permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of the TIF District; and be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The report shall include, among other items, the following information: (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) any fiscal disparity deduction from the captured net tax capacity under section 469.177, subdivision 3; (5) the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1); (6) any captured net tax capacity distributed among affected taxing districts under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (2); (7) the type of district; (8) the date the municipality approved the tax increment financing plan and the date of approval of any modification of the tax increment financing plan, the approval of which requires notice, discussion, a public hearing, and findings under subdivision 4, paragraph (a); (9) the date the authority first requested certification of the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of request for certification regarding any parcel added to the district; (10) the date the county auditor first certified the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of any parcel added to the district; SPR.IN GS T ED Page 15 - 1 0 5 - City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (11) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (12) the date the district must be decertified; (13) for the reporting period and prior years of the district, the actual amount received from, at least, the following categories: (i) tax increments paid by the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under section 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1), but excluding any excess taxes; (ii) tax increments that are interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; (iii) tax increments that are proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority with tax increments; (iv) tax increments that are repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; (v) bond or loan proceeds; (vi) special assessments; (vii) grants; and (viii) transfers from funds not exclusively associated with the district; (14) for the reporting period and for the prior years of the district, the amount budgeted under the tax increment financing plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: (1) acquisition of and and buildings through condemnation or purchase; (ii) site improvements or preparation costs; (iii) installation of public utilities, parking facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, or other similar public improvements; (iv) administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the Authority; and (v) public park facilities, facilities for social, recreational, or conference purposes, or other similar pubiic improvements; and (vi) transfers to funds not exclusively associated with the district; (15) for properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the Authority and the price paid by the developer; (16) the amount of any payments and the value of in -kind benefits, such as physical improvements and the use of building space, that are paid or financed with tax increments and are provided to another governmental unit other than the municipality during the reporting period; SPRINGS ED Page 16 - 1 0 6 - City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (17) the amount of any payments for activities and improvements located outside of the district that are paid for or financed with tax increments; (18) the amount of payments of principal and interest that are made during the reporting period on any non- defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (19) the principal amount, at the end of the reporting period, of any non - defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (20) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (11) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (21) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; (22) whether the tax increment financing plan or other governing document permits increment revenues to be expended; (i) to pay bonds, the proceeds of which were or may be expended on activities outside of the district; (11) for deposit into a common bond fund from which money may be expended on activities located outside of the district; or (iii) to otherwise finance activities located outside of the tax increment financing district; (23) the estimate contained in the tax increment financing plan of the cost of the project, including administrative expenses to be paid with tax increment; and (24) any additional information the state auditor may require. The Authority must also annually publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annual statement for each tax increment financing district showing: SPRINGSTED Page 17 - 1 0 7 - City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (5) the date the district must be decertified; (6) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased obligations; (7) (8) (9) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; the amounts of tax increment received and expended in the reporting period; and any additional information the authority deems necessary. The annual statement must inform readers that additional information regarding each district may be obtained from the authority, and must explain how the additional information may be requested. The Authority must publish the annual statement for a year no later than August 15 of the next year. The authority must identify the newspaper of general circulation in the municipality to which the annual statement has been or will be submitted for publication and provide a copy of the annual statement to the county board, county auditor, the school board, the state auditor, and the governing body of the municipality on or before August 1 of the year in which the statement must be published. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlined in this section shall begin with the year the district was certified, and shall end in the year in which both the district has been decertified and all tax increments have been spent or returned to the county for redistribution. Failure to meet these requirements, as determined by the State Auditors Office, may result in suspension of distribution of tax increment. SPRINGSTED Page 18 - 1 0 8 - Exhibit I Map of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 D Proposed boundaries of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 SPRINGSTED - 109 - Page 19 Exhibit l Map of Development District No. 1 Development District No. 1 City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota TTJ4 LYCE A A5 *4 ee O 4: `•. '.ice SPRINGSTED - 110 - Page 20 Exhibit 11 Assumptions Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario B - Fiscal disparities contribution from within district Type of Tax increment Financing District Maximum Duration of TIF District Projected Certification Request Date Decertification Date Base Estimated Market Value Original Net Tax Capacity Base Estimated Market Value Increase in Estimated Market Value Total Estimated Market Value Total Net Tax Capacity Redevelopment 25 years from 1st increment 06/01/04 12/31/31 (26 Years of Increment) 2003/2004 5880, 600 $10,345 Assessment/Collection Year 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 $880,600 5880,600 $880,600 $880,600 0 10,614,465 21,228,930 35,673,395 $880,600 $11,495,065 522,109,530 $36.553,995 $10,345 $141,072 5282,144 $499.066 City of Lino Lakes Anoka County ISD #831 Other 47.603% 37114% 24.557% 7.050% Rice Creek Watershed Local Tax Capacity Rate Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10 %) Pooling Percent 116.924% 2002/2003 35.6909% 10.00% 15.00% Bonds Bonds Dated 06/01/04 Bond Issue @ 5.92% (NIC) $11,335,000 Eligible Project Costs $7,959,040 Present Value Date & Rate Note (Pav -As- You -Go) Note Dated 06/01/04 Note Rate 8.00% Note Amount $7,066,500 06/01/04 5.00% Notes SPRINGSTED Page 21 Projected Tax Increment Report O O O r (n S N S O 00 00 O 00 O CO 00 a0 00 O O c0 00 O 07 00 tD 00 O O N 0) h CO 0) CO I,- N. 1- f- r N- h h N- 1� f` n n om^ 1- N. f` N V' M O 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S ti ll 0) (0 0) N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N CV N N N N N r M O O M N. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N S O h 1..-00 C0 O0 07 O N O O 00 00 N 00 O O OD (0(0 00 40 00 CO M m N 0) bT N 0 O e N 0 (OD 7 OD 'D - to � ❑ o O O O c0 O f` OO h O O In L() O O O (n O O O O (0 (0 (n to O O to O O 0) N- M O) O COV_(r?m wav_a <gaccv�ve:vv_�cavve_ N h O M h (n or. or_ S S(0 (0 S S S S S S S(0 S S S S N S 00 r <{ O 0 0 CO 0 0 0 CO 0 0 O O O O O (D CO O O (D CO 00000 ( SO 0 M- 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N. N O n O) r 00 O O O O O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O CO (1) (') 10 O] M 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) O) 0) r 4') (n 1( 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000'7 M S O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O or S S S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO O O O O O r 0) N. O n 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) co 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) CO 0) CO 0) CO 0) 0) r r N c+) M CI CO 2) 01 CO CO CO CO CO C') c') LTi c') c) c) co c') M P) CO (0 MLo co 69 0 S 07 O N m O O 00 CO CO CO Ln M M M M CO CO M M M M M co M M M M co M M M O (0 CO n N O co co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 f` n M 03 5 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N h O) N 7 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O M (D O R O O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 r c� LO n CO o r M m fR o g e e e. e e e e e e e e e e e e o e a e e e e e o e e e S S S S S S V S S S S 'd' or or S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co co N Ni N N N N N N N N N N 0) Cr) Cr) 0) O) O) 0) 0) 0) CO co CO CO O 0) 0) 0 01 CO O 0) 0 0) CO O) D1 0) CO CO x U N O O O O co O O O O O O O O (0 O O O O O O O O O O E O L —N O O ~ U 0) N >` .5 O H O 0) U O U 0 0 n 0) CO N S O co O O O O O O O O O CO O O O O O CO O O CO 0 N 0) S 03 r t-. CO M M CO co co co co co co co co co co co M CO CO CO CO CO 0 M O 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N (n CO CO CO O N r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cc) h 0 (n S 0) S Q or or Q or C or or S Q R' Ci V' S or Q Or V N C O CO 07 0) Of CO 0) 0) 0) 0) CO CO 0) 0) 0) CO CO CO 0) O) 0) CO 0) O O O O N r 0) CO CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 02 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O aa`` O CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i0 V T O 7 n O S S S C S O. S S C S S S 7 S S V S S S S CD D y 0) h 7 s 0) O O (D O O CO CO O O O O O O CO CO O CO O O O J LL N (0 CO O co M M M M CO M M M co M Cr) Cr) M M M M M M CO Q O M 4 X _T y .0 • d C 12. - OZ�j O O (0 U) O O O O O LO O O O 1!) O O O O (n O (n O O O O O O (0) O 7 S S S S S V V S V C S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S R CO CO V M M M c') C) M (+) M M CO CO M M CO CO CO M CO CO CO CO M CO CO M CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 LL7 N S (D N- 0) 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) CO 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) O S S r ` 7 CO 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �` CO CO 0 r 0 ('- V O (D CO (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CO CO (D CO (D (D (D (O (O CO X X O co- N 0) (6 -1-- .,- t� 1` r n n N r r r t` tv N ti W 12 U r r co 0) co co co co co co co 07 co 00 07 co co co 07 co co co co co O p -, a N N S h O) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1- ZCO U m o 0) S LC) O CO 0) 0 r N CO 7 (0) CD W CO O r N CO S U) O f` CO 0) O r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 - .. N N N N N N N N N N M M M m co M M M M co M co M M M CO M CO CO M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO M M CO .9 r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N < 0- w -112- N N a) C6 SPRINGST 13D With Project and TIF District Project or TIF District •0 c*) 0 N 0 O -0 O O ) U to C N * C7 N C7 a) = m 3 U �r CO N CD m 0 aCD= m- = x .0 U Z _ t U U To o m o 0 0 h- 1- .0 co U m C) O O J X = 0 I— o U e a oo To- Lo CV U O * 0) N- C00 CO L0 h. O a) ) m +O- M 1- C7 h• L 7 8 m M N O ID— ca _ ¢ CO O O CO CD CO CD X h• OD CD .c) m co O f` 0 X I— 0 O O Z m U) N t` O H Z U r 11 CO co CO CO c) h C7 c) O O OO O CO O X m m O O O U C .C. U Off) T O0) CO d f U Z U C') Cr) o co ON c(0 N .a C• O. h• CO U c) o m 0 CD as - c, 1- Z m r N— N N U C U U C+'7 O (0 c00 0) cc 3 (0 O N Ch O J N I� r O m L1 o Q' o CO N CC CO O I— Z � N N U ity of Lino Lakes Anoka County M 0 - 113 - > d O C6 ` 0 -a-E- '8 Ca X co Lo L N N m eN U m a- O m O 0 1- m m az a O co m N a) U c0 7 - 0 Qa) t1 > N > To CU 0 r O U U a) c0 r OC .0 U ~ O O a 5) CU m l 0 r T C .0 0 N L6 En jr N O N o a) f2 a) O X y X N m CO a) 0 . H m u. C I— U • LC71 O 07 CD O w J 0 O `m U aa)) 3 0 3 m N u CD CO U m O 2 8 m m 0 0 ca L y 0 LL U 'a .xm H X p U 0 co O O r0 O T Z o >,-- a E = v N `7 . m a) 0. CM ? a) m m cc 15- ai E ca U o co r 0 U m .0 Q) m .0 O -. C co '-' CO a m O U 7 Z IX U '0 - a) te 2 CD 0 a) 0 a" N O U 0 O m 5 c U m O0 O G •X - O 0 -a) m n 1 i.=. a) 7 = ZS m 3 LD * Statement 1: O a) co co co co > `0 0 U a) a) N O lie 0 co 1— co o. m m :r. = O 0 C 0 O .0 >. r. y m (0 o O o ' 0 'a m o U 0 ca co ,73 ,a T I— U C a) —° n O Z a a c m O a) U To 0 > n a m m a 0 i tL ?^ m r C -a m co O O U = N N O. m a) c O O a) O O T .m U O a m C CT 0 C N Q) 5) U ar .0 x c a) 0 U C m SPRINGS TED Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario B - Fiscal disparities contribution from within district Assumptions Present Value Date P.V. Rate - Gross T.I. 06/01/04 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment Subtotal Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF Difference $72,222,325 12,468, 770 S59,753,555 0 $59,753,555 Annual Present Gross Tax Value @ Year Increment 5.00% 1 2006 152,851 136,404 2 2007 317,798 270,097 3 2008 539,778 436,913 4 2009 762,323 587,664 5 2010 984,868 723,068 6 2011 1,042,465 728,909 7 2012 1,100,063 732,555 8 2013 1,100,063 697,671 9 2014 1,100,063 664,449 10 2015 1,100, 063 632,808 11 2016 1,100, 063 602.675 12 2017 1,100.063 573,976 13 2018 1,100,063 546,644 14 2019 1,100,063 520,613 15 2020 1.100,063 495,822 16 2021 1.100,063 472,211 17 2022 1 ,100,063 449,725 18 2023 1,1 00,063 428,310 19 2024 1,100.063 407,914 20 2025 1,100,063 388,489 21 2026 1,100,063 369,990 22 2027 1,100,063 352,371 23 2028 1,100.063 335,592 24 2029 1,100,063 319,611 25 2030 1,100,063 304,392 26 2031 1,100.063 289.897 $25.801,343 $12,468,770 SPI? IN GSTED - 114 - Page 24