Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/24/2005 Council PacketAMENDED (10/19/05) AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, October 24, 2005 Council Chambers City Council Meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Open Mike - Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) October 24, 2005 (Check No. 75078 through 75219 in the amount of $714,520.83). pg. 5 -18 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14919 through 14939 in the amount of $79,168.36). pg. 19 B) Consider Resolution 05 -157 Authorizing the Certification of Delinquent Water and Sewer Utility Charges for collection with 20054 Property Taxes Payable in 2006 pg. 20 -26 C) Consider Resolution 05 158 Calling a Public Hering Regarding the Issuance of Revenue Notes For The Benefit Of YMCA pg. 27 31 (Moved to 2. A) D) Consider Approving Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Blue Heron Elementary pg.32 E) Consider Resolution 05 -164 Approving Summary of Ordinance 05 -05 (sign ordinance) for Publication pg. 33 -35 F) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes Page 1 AMENDED (10/19/05) AGENDA G) Consider September 26, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes H) Consider October 10, 2005 Special City Council Meeting Minutes I) Consider October 10, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes 2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Consider Resolution 05 -158 Calling a Public Hearing Regarding the Issuance of Revenue Notes For The Benefit Of YMCA pg. 27 -31 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 10 -05 Amending City Code by Increasing the Salary of the Mayor & City Council Members pg. 36 -37 B) Establish Crime Prevention Position pg. 38 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) None 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None 6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -159, Adopting Final I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), Jeff Smyser pg. 39 -40 B) Considcration of Resolution No. 05 153, Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Village of Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser C) Legacy at Woods Edge, Paul Bengtson i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance 09 -05 to amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include a hotel as a permitted use. pg. 69 -71 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -160, Approving Final Plat, Village No. 4 pg. 72 -74 iii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -163, Approving Final Plan/Conditional Use Permit, Betty's Pies pg. 75 -97 Page 2 AMENDED (10 /19/05) AGENDA iv. Consideration of Resolution No. Lakewood Apartments v. Consideration of Resolution No. Country Inn & Suites 05 -161, Approving Final Plan, pg. 98 -130 05 -162, Approving Final Plan, pg. 131 -147 D) Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 11 -05, Authorizing Sale of Property, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes YMCA, Mary Divine pg. 148 -150 E) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -165, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, Construction of Well No.5 Pumphouse, Jim Studenski pg. 151 -153 F) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -166, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Authorizing Final Payment, West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements, Jim Studenski pg. 154 -162 G) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -167, Approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment Request No. 1, 2005 Overlay Project, Jim Studenski pg. 163 -168 H) Adopting Special Assessments, Jim Studenski i. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -168, Adopting Assessments, Legacy at Woods Edge Improvement Project, Michael Grochala pg. 169 -171 ii. Consideration of Resolution Nos. 05 -169 — 05 -176, Adopting Assessments, 2005 Development Projects, Jim Studenski pg. 172 -189 iii. Consideration of Resolution 05 -177, Adopting Assessments, Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities, Jim Studenski pg. 190 -192 7. Unfinished Business A) None 8. New Business A) Consider October 5, 2005 Work Session Minutes (Mayor Bergeson was absent). 721 71....atc.7 7 eaye oli. y 9. Community Calendar, October 25, 2005 through November 14, 2005: Page 3 AMENDED (10/19/05) AGENDA A) Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 6:30 p.m. B) EDAC Meeting, Thursday, November 3, 2005, 7:00 a.m. C) Park Board Meeting, Monday, November 7, 2005, 6:30p.m. D) Council Work Session, Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 5:30 p.m. E) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 6:30 p.m. F) City Hall Closed in Observance of Veteran's Day, Friday, November 11, 2005 G) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 14, 2005, 6:30 p.m. 10. Adjourn Page 4 SUMMARY MINUTES (FORMERLY EXPANDED AGENDA) CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, October 24, 2005 Council Chambers City Council Meeting 6:30 p.m. (6:34 p.m.) (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Open Mike — THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK. Call to Order and Roll Call — COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items — NO CHANGES 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) October 24, 2005 (Check No. 75078 through 75219 in the amount of $714,520.83). pg. 5 -18 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14919 through 14939 in the amount of $79,168.36). pg. 19 B) Consider Resolution 05 -157 Authorizing the Certification of Delinquent Water and Sewer Utility Charges for collection with 20054 Property Taxes Payable in 2006 pg. 20 -26 C) Consider Resolution 05 158 Calling a Public Hearing Regarding the Issuance of Revenue Notes For The Benefit Of YMCA pg. 27 31 (Moved to 2. A) D) Consider Approving Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Blue Heron Elementary pg.32 E) Consider Resolution 05 -164 Approving Summary of Ordinance 05 -05 (sign ordinance) for Publication pg. 33 -35 F) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes G) Consider September 26, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes Page l SUMMARY MINUTES (FORMERLY EXPANDED AGENDA) H) Consider October 10, 2005 Special City Council Meeting Minutes I) Consider October 10, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes COUNCILMEMBER DAHL REQUESTED ITEM 1F BE REMOVED. MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA TO INCLUDE ALL OTHER ITEMS PRINTED. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Consider Resolution 05 -158 Calling a Public Hearing Regarding the Issuance of Revenue Notes For The Benefit Of YMCA pg. 27 -31 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL TO APPROVE RESOLUTUON 05 -158 SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 10 -05 Amending City Code by Increasing the Salary of the Mayor & City Council Members pg. 36 -37 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON TO DECREASE SALARY 3% FOR THE YEAR 2007. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B) Establish Crime Prevention Position pg. 38 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON TO RECLASSIFY VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR POSITION TO CRIME PREVENTION SPECIALIST. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) None 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None 6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala Page 2 SUMMARY MINUTES (FORMERLY EXPANDED AGENDA) A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -159, Adopting Final I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), Jeff Smyser pg. 39 -40 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -159, ADOPTING FINAL AUAR. MOTION PASSED. COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON VOTED NAY. B Consideration of Resolution No. 05 153, Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Village of Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser C) Legacy at Woods Edge, Paul Bengtson i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance 09 -05 to amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include a hotel as a permitted use. pg. 69 -71 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON APPROVING ORDINANCE 09 -05. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -160, Approving Final Plat, Village No. 4 pg. 72 -74 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -160. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. iii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -163, Approving Final Plan/Conditional Use Permit, Betty's Pies pg. 75 -97 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -163. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. iv. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -161, Approving Final Plan, Lakewood Apartments pg. 98 -130 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -161. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. v. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -162, Approving Final Plan, Country Inn & Suites pg. 131 -147 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -162. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 3 SUMMARY MINUTES (FORMERLY EXPANDED AGENDA) D) Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 11 -05, Authorizing Sale of Property, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes YMCA, Mary Divine pg. 148 -150 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT APPROVING 1ST READING OF ORDINANCE 11- 05. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. E) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -165, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, Construction of Well No.5 Pumphouse, Jim Studenski pg. 151 -153 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY MAYOR BERGESON APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -165. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. F) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -166, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Authorizing Final Payment, West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements, Jim Studenski pg. 154 -162 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -166. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. G) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -167, Approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment Request No. 1, 2005 Overlay Project, Jim Studenski pg. 163 -168 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -167. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. H) Adopting Special Assessments, Jim Studenski i. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -168, Adopting Assessments, Legacy at Woods Edge Improvement Project, Michael Grochala pg. 169 -171 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -168. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. ii. Consideration of Resolution Nos. 05 -169 — 05 -176, Adopting Assessments, 2005 Development Projects, Jim Studenski pg. 172 -189 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTIONS 05 -169 THROUGH 05 -176. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 4 SUMMARY MINUTES (FORMERLY EXPANDED AGENDA) iii. Consideration of Resolution 05 -177, Adopting Assessments, Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities, Jim Studenski pg. 190 -192 MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING RESOLUTION 05 -177. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. Unfinished Business A) None 8. New Business A) Consider October 5, 2005 Work Session Minutes (Mayor Bergeson was absent). MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL APPROVING WORK SESSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 5, 2005. MAYOR BERGESON ABSTAINED. B) Donated Leave Policy 9. Community Calendar, October 25, 2005 through November 14, 2005: A) Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 6:30 p.m. B) EDAC Meeting, Thursday, November 3, 2005, 7:00 a.m. C) Park Board Meeting, Monday, November 7, 2005, 6:30p.m. D) ELECTION DAY, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2005 (ADDED) E) Council Work Session, Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 5:30 p.m. F) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 6:30 p.m. G) City Hall Closed in Observance of Veteran's Day, Friday, November 11, 2005 G) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 14, 2005, 6:30 p.m. 10. Adjourn MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO AJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:12 P.M. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 5 Date: 10/06/2005 Time: 14:31:25 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) S Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 4946 - 4946 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Page: 1 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000106 NELSON, ROBERT 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000221 RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 749.47 749.47 .00 .00 000489 TDS METROCOM 1 1,542.79 1,542.79 .00 .00 000511 LADEN, PERRY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000718 HOMES BY J BROWN 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00 000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001014 T/c BUILDERS, INC. 1 6,500.00 6,500.00 .00 .00 001840 HILLESHEIM, TIM 1 160.97 160.97 .00 .00 001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 192.65 192.65 .00 .00 002130 TRALLE, PAUL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 111,8 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00 002694 SBC, INC. 1 26.82 26.82 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42 .00 .00 003241 PHAN, HOANG 1 27.50 27.50 .00 .00 003242 CCE REGISTRATION 1 195.00 195.00 .00 .00 003243 PEARSON, DAVID A. 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 003260 STANSBERRY, RAY 1 52.33 52.33 .00 .00 003270 WEBER, JIM 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 003478 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 1 1,141.55 1,141.55 .00 .00 004608 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004609 ROOT, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 • Date: 10/06/2005 Time: 14:31:26 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal lk# Name Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 007158 TUMA, KEVIN Grand Totals: • • 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 23 16,312.50 16,312.50 .00 .00* Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:09:02 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 4956 4956 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL FM Entry - Invoice Journal Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # o. c copi es: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Vendor # Name Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000017 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 460.32 460.32 .00 .00 000107 R & D BATTERIES, INC. 1 287.55 287.55 .00 .00 000128 BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC. 1 836.74 836.74 .00 .00 000155 O'DEA, MARY JO 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 9,362.20 9,362.20 .00 .00 000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 92.42 92.42 .00 .00 000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. 1 115.02 115.02 .00 .00 000236 O'CONNELL, TERESA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000248 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 39.28 39.28 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 92.03 92.03 .00 .00 000347 MULTICARE ASSOCIATES 1 465.00 465.00 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 000486 COORDINATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LTD. 1 607.43 607.43 .00 .00 000510 MENARDS 2 32.64 32.64 .00 .00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 6 2,616.02 2,616.02 .00 .00 000548 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000641 LASKE, RENEE & MIKE 1 290.00 290.00 .00 .00 000719 JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT, INC. 1 603.86 603.86 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 3 342.15 342.15 .00 .00 • Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07 :09:03 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice Journal # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost Discount 000772 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 1 201.16 201.16 .00 .00 000871 MONSON, MIKE 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00 000875 AVENET, LLC 1 840.00 840.00 .00 .00 000882 CORNERSTONE HOME BUILDER 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 .00 .00 000900 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 1 362.90 362.90 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 15,358.30 15,358.30 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 139.75 139.75 .00 .00 000947 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS, INC. 1 286.12 286.12 .00 .00 000970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 57.24 57.24 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 114,847.50 114,847.50 .00 .00 001044 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, INC. 1 112.00 112.00 .00 .00 001094 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. 1 5,308.41 5,308.41 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,525.96 3,525.96 .00 .00 001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 154.50 154.50 .00 .00 001267 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 14.37 14.37 .00 .00 001291 DEAN GALLERY, INC. 1 85.60 85.60 .00 .00 • 2 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 5,160.12 5,160.12 .00 .00 001339 URS CORPORATION 1 17,598.18 17,598.18 .00 .00 001349 E. H. RENNER & SONS, INC. 1 20,178.00 . 20,178.00 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 2 4,847.82 4,847.82 .00 .00 001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 31.35 31.35 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 852.89 852.89 .00 .00 001520 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. 1 374.45 374.45 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 3 92.98 92.98 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 63.17 63.17 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 81.34 81.34 .00 .00 001620 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 1 49.95 49.95 .00 .00 • Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07 :09:03 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 drior # Name Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001621 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 1 695.71 695.71 .00 .00 001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 1,108.35 1,108.35 .00 .00 001771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 2,650.00 2,650.00 .00 .00 001832 QUAD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 175.00 175.00 .00 .00 001847 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING,IN 1 188.51 188.51 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 2 2,315.00 2,315.00 .00 .00 002030 J- CRAFT, INC. 1 45.44 45.44 .00 .00 002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 402.16 402.16 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 94.93 94.93 .00 .00 002175 HOKANSON PLUMBING /HEATING, INC. 1 149.00 149.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 17.49 17.49 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 96.92 96.92 .00 .00 002478 TIGERDIRECT.COM 1 318.45 318.45 .00 .00 002522 DALCO ROOFING /SHEET METAL, INC. 1 27,240.00 27,240.00 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 96,764.56 96,764.56 .00 .00 002700 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 126.15 126.15 .00 .00 Ili° MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 4,946.00 4,946.00 .00 .00 002781 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 002822 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC 1 70.82 70.82 .00 .00 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 9,163.12 9,163.12 .00 .00 002996 UNITED SUPPLY CORPORATION 1 135.00 135.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 332.92 332.92 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 711.15 711.15 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 5 908.89 908.89 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 2 5,785.23 5,785.23 .00 .00 003281 BRUGGEMAN HOMES 1 47.45 47.45 .00 .00 • Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:09:04 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost Discount 003284 FROST, JEFFREY 1 108.63 108.63 .00 .00 003289 GEOTECH OF MINNESOTA 1 372.17 372.17 .00 .00 003292 MCKINNEY, SUE 1 19.00 19.00 .00 .00 003311 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 003440 RILEY, JOHN T. OR JEANINE M. 1 100.61 100.61 .00 .00 003445 MN DEPT OF LABOR /INDUSTRY 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 003448 TMI COATINGS, INC. 1 173,688.50 173,688.50 .00 .00 003457 AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 003460 CALLAHAN, ALISON 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 003463 EJM PIPE SERVICES, INC. 1 2,928.00 2,928.00 .00 .00 003482 ROYAL EXCAVATING 1 35.12 35.12 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 293.25 293.25 .00 .00 003617 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00 003816 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. 1 1,125.00 1,125.00 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 2 58,531.52 58,531.52 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 55.95 55.95 .00 .00 • 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 4 828.11 828.11 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 29.11 29.11 .00 .00 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 2 3,296.40 . 3,296.40 .00 .00 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 548.89 548.89 .00 .00 004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 1 177.76 177.76 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 279.38 279.38 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 421.74 421.74 .00 .00 004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 004244 MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 1 99.60 99.60 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 282.57 282.57 .00 .00 • Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:09:04 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 # Name Discount • # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004350 T.K.D.A. 26 68,545.47 68,545.47 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 4.76 4.76 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 808.75 808.75 .00 004470 COMO LURE & SUPPLIES, INC. 2 1,280.05 1,280.05 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 68.00 68.00 .00 004560 U S BANK 1 3,174.58 3,174.58 .00 004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 8,439.99 8,439.99 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 78.45 78.45 .00 004606 U. S. BANK 1 290.00 290.00 .00 004665 BAUMAN, BARBARA 1 50.00 50.00 .00 004666 BOR, BARBARA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 2 4,940.00 4,940.00 .00 900223 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 1 195.00 195.00 .00 950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 150.00 150.00 .00 Grand Totals: 173 698,208.33 698,208.33 .00 • • .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:23:24 • Ranges: Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: Operator: JAL Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Options: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (r) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 4947 4957 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount 75078 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 0 AVENET, LLC SERVICE /MAINTENANCE /SUPP 0 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. TOW '05 DODGE NEON 0 BRUGGEMAN HOMES REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER 0 CALLAHAN, ALISON REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC O CORNERSTONE HOME BUILD REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6438 C 0 GEOTECH OF MINNESOTA REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER 75082 HOMES BY J BROWN REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1569 G O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT AG 0 LASKE, RENEE & MIKE REIMBURSE WATER METER /TA 75085 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING O MCKINNEY, SUE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT SEPTEMBER SAC /OCTOBER O MINNESOTA STATE TREASU SEPTEMBER SURCHARGE Ilk86 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME MECKLE, TERRY J. O MN. DEPT OF HEALTH STATE WATER FEE 88 PEARSON, DAVID A. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6227 75090 PHAM, HOANG REIMBURSE O RILEY, JOHN T. OR JEAN REIMBURSE O ROYAL EXCAVATING 0 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF O T.K.D.A. 75096 T/C BUILDERS, INC. O TIG£RDIRECT.COM 75099 TUNA, KEVIN 75100 WEBER, JIM O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS 0 U S BANK 0 U S BANK 0 SE W PROGRAM REC SHORT TERM ESC REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN APOLLO LANDING /AUGUST REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1527 PRINTER REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR Total for Dept ** M SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 201 SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 202 ** * * * * ** 749.47 * * * * * * ** 840.00 * * * * * * ** 342.15 * * * * * * ** 47.45 * * * * * * ** 25.00 * * * * * * ** 3,500.00 * * * * * * ** 372.17 * * * * * * ** 2,500.00 * * * * * * ** 344.00 * * * * * * ** 290.00 * * * * * * ** 777.00 * * * * * * ** 19.00 * * * * * * ** 51,678.00 * * * * * * ** 9,163.12 * * * * * * ** 246.42 * * * * * * ** 4,946.00 * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 * * * * * * ** 27.50 * * * * * * ** 100.61 * * * * * * ** 35.12 * * * * * * ** 9.10 * * * * * * ** 45,039.11 * * * * * * ** 6,500.00 * * * * * * ** 318.45 * * * * * * ** 40.00 * * * * * * ** 35.00 * * * * * * ** 562.50 129,507.17* ADULT IN 80.31 80.31* ADULT SP 100.00 100.00* REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. TRANSPORTATION /PROGRAM R SPECIAL 195.00 Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:23:24 Operator: JAL • Check # • Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O SHOREVIEW, CITY OF PROGRAM REC SPECIAL 0 U S BANK SEPTEMBER SPECIAL Total for Dept 205 O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 4.24 O GREG LARSON SPORTS - G GOAL LINE /SOCCERBALLS YOUTH IN 526.75 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PACKAGE PHOTOS YOUTH IN 2,156.00 Total for Dept 207 2,686.99* 0 GREG LARSON SPORTS - G GOAL LINE /SOCCERBALLS YOUTH SP 168.96 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PACKAGE PHOTOS YOUTH SP 2,784.00 Total for Dept 208 2,952.96* 251.55 312.77 759.32* O MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. FLORAL ARRANGEMENT /SILVE MAYOR /CO O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC SEPT 13, SEPT 26 MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 O ACCLAIM BENEFITS O BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, 0 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O STAR TRIBUNE, INC. O U S BANK 0 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, 75097 TDS METROCOM FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI CONFERENCE DRUG TESTING ADVERTISING /ORD 07 -05 ADVERTISING /POLICE OFFIC SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 402 ADVERTISING /VOTING Total for Dept 403 IN ADVERTISING /CHARTER Total for Dept 405 MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE Total for Dept 406 0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL CO O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR LEGAL CO Total for Dept 414 ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ELECTION CHARTER SENIORS O QUAD AREA CHAMBER OF C MEMBERSHIP 2005 -2006 O U S BANK SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 415 75083 75084 75087 75091 75092 75093 0 75098 • HYDEN, MICHAEL LADEN, PERRY NELSON, ROBERT POGALZ, BRIAN RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. ROOT, MICHAEL SMYSER, JEFF TRALLE, PAUL QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND MILEAGE /TUITION /LODGING QUARTERLY STIPEND ECONOMIC ECONOMIC PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING 115.02 808.75 923.77* 154.50 60.00 112.00 110.40 421.74 249.00 1,107.64* 31.35 31.35* 55.20 55.20* 98.62 98.62* 1,971.00 14,608.30 16,579.30* 175.00 240.00 415.00* 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 225.00 150.00 548.89 150.00 Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:23:24 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 U S BANK SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 416 O T.K.D.A. MEETINGS Total for Dept 417 0 U S BANK SEPTEMBER Total for Dept 418 0 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S COURSE /MITCH DM, CHRIS B POLICE 0 ASPEN MILLS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE POLICE 0 FAST BREAK CORNER MARK CAR WASHES POLICE 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING POLICE 0 KATE AUTO PARTS, INC. VENTVISOR /CLEANER /BRUSH POLICE 0 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF PO CONFERENCE /DAVE P POLICE 0 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTOR VEHICLE /FORFEITURE FORMS POLICE 0 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC AUGUST USAGE POLICE 0 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFE TRAINING /DEVELOPMENT, KA POLICE 0 MONSON, MIKE REISSUE AP #74333 POLICE 0 MULTICARE ASSOCIATES EXAM /VINCENT K POLICE 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE POLICE 75089 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF REIMBE LODGING /CAB /AIRLI POLICE 0 SAM'S CLUB, INC. WATER /COKE POLICE 0 SHRED -IT, INC. DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA CONNECT CHARGES /3RD QUAR POLICE 75097 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE POLICE 0 U S BANK SEPTEMBER POLICE O UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 0 VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE POLICE Total for Dept 420 PLANNING 266.26 1,940.15* ENGINEER COMM DEV 0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI QUARTERLY BUDGET Total for Dept 421 0 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRAT REGISTRATION /VERN R 0 T.K.D.A. PERMIT REVIEWS /AUGUST Total for Dept 422 0 BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY 0 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS, O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE O HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN O JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT 0 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE, IN O R & D BATTERIES, INC. 0 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC • FIRE BUILDING BUILDING PAVEMENT MARKING STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE STREETS PAINT STREETS STREET SIGN STREETS PARTS /SUPPLIES STREETS CURB /GUTTER REPAIR STREETS CULVERT STREETS PARTS /SUPPLIES STREETS SPRING TERMINAL STREETS CULVERT REPAIR /809 OAK STREETS 468.48 468.48* 249.00 249.00* 420.00 2,616.02 31.66 21.31 14.37 96.92 402.16 20.00 70.82 37.00 40.00 90.00 465.00 852.89 1,141.55 29.11 55.95 390.00 743.84 1,547.33 78.45 57.24 9,221.62* 114,847.50 114,847.50* 35.00 630.72 665.72* 836.74 787.71 286.12 4,847.82 25.94 2, 650.00 603.86 25.67 287.55 1,125.00 Date: 10/14/2005 Time 07:23:24 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 75094 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE STREETS 0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT STREETS 75097 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE STREETS Total for Dept 430 0 COMO LOBE & SUPPLIES, GREASE FLEET 0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. GASOHOL FLEET 0 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO SENDING UNIT FLEET 0 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. HOUSING FLEET 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET 0 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I CHEMICALS FLEET 0 J- CRAFT, INC. CABLE FLEET 0 LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS FLEET 0 MENARDS JACKET FLEET 0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. SPANNER /CASTORS /FORK ASS FLEET O OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE, IN PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI PARTS WASHER FLUID FLEET 0 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, CORE FLEET O THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH GASKET FLEET O UNITED SUPPLY CORPORAT INVOICE 8692 FLEET Total for Dept 431 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER GOVERNME 0 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT RENTAL GOVERNME 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME 0 CENTERPOINT/MINNEGASCO MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE GOVERNME 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE GOVERNME 0 COORDINATED BUSINESS S COPIER MAINTENANCE GOVERNME DALCO ROOFING /SHEET ME REPAIR ROOF GOVERNME DEEP ROCK WATER COMPAN MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE GOVERNME FILTRATION SYSTEMS, IN FILTER GOVERNME HOKANSON PLUMBING /HEAT REPLACE VALVE GOVERNME HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV LANDSCAPE ROCK GOVERNME MENARDS ELBOW /TAPEMEASURE /COUPLI GOVERNME MN DEPT OF LABOR /INDUS BOILER LICENSE GOVERNME STANSBERRY, KAY REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW GOVERNME SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP BALLAST START GOVERNME TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE GOVERNME TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR SHED DOOR GOVERNME U S BANK SEPTEMBER GOVERNME WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. ODOR OUT RUG /ROOM GOVERNME XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE GOVERNME Total for Dept 432 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER PARKS O CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE PARKS O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE PARKS O DEAN GALLERY, INC. MAPS PARKS 0 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. BLEACHER PARKS O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS • 0 0 0 0 75081 0 0 75095 0 75097 0 0 0 0 -16- 8.94 282.57 106.59 11,874.51* 1,280.05 5,160.12 908.89 92.98 14.04 81.34 45.44 17.49 7.42 332.92 337.23 343.26 279.38 4.76 135.00 9,040.32* 349.17 92.03 108.09 47.31 1,190.75 607.43 27,240.00 49.95 201.16 149.00 192.65 25.22 20.00 52.33 99.60 372.21 68.00 129.91 39.28 5,536.68 36,570.77* 111.15 31.54 42.60 85.60 374.45 12.11 Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:23:24 • Check # 0 0 0 0 75097 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MAN KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET NATURE CALLS, INC. T.K.D.A. TDS METROCOM 0 MRPA STRIPING PAINT FOOD ITEMS PORTABLE RESTROOMS BIRCH STREET TRAIL /AUGUS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE Total for Dept 450 WORKSHOP /LIZ B Total for Dept 451 O BAUMAN, BARBARA QUARTERLY STIPEND 0 BOR, BARBARA QUARTERLY STIPEND 75079 CCE REGISTRATION REGISTRATION /MARTY 0 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND 0 KUKONEN, ROD QUARTERLY STIPEND 0 MINNESOTA EROSION CONT MEMBERSHIP /TIM P 0 O'CONNELL, TERESA QUARTERLY STIPEND O O'DEA, MARY JO QUARTERLY STIPEND O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /NOTICE Total for Dept 461 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET FOOD ITEMS O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI CRUSHED OIL FILTERS Total for Dept 462 • 0 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 OAKWILT LAB WORK Total for Dept 463 0 U. S. BANK CORPORATE SERVICES Total for Dept 470 0 0 0 0 0 0 75080 0 0 75094 0 0 75097 0 • AMERICAN LEAK DETECTIO CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO CONNEXUS ENERGY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE FROST, JEFFREY GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA HILLESHEIM, TIM NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC SEC, INC. SHOREVIEW, CITY OF SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICK TDS METROCOM TMI COATINGS, INC. PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATI 188.51 70.39 711.15 964.81 113.94 2,706.25* 95.00 95.00* ENVIRONM 50.00 ENVIRONM 100.00 A ENVIRONM 195.00 ENVIRONM 100.00 ENVIRONM 150.00 ENVIRONM 35.00 ENVIRONM 100.00 ENVIRONM 225.00 OF ME ENVIRONM 17.25 972.25* CAMERA INSPECTION /WELL H MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE PARTS /SUPPLIES MILEAGE /TUITION TAPE /SPLICE CONN REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW WATER METER PARTS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN MG TANK #2 MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE RECONDITIONING WATER TAN Total for Dept 494 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE 0 EJM PIPE SERVICES, INC BORING WATER LINE 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT SEPTEMBER SAC /OCTOBER SE SOLID WA 24.54 SOLID WA 484.85 509.39* FORESTRY 15.00 15.00* DEBT SER 290.00 290.00* WATER 300.00 WATER 47.30 WATER 1,188.65 WATER 6.84 WATER 108.63 WATER 92.42 WATER 160.97 WATER 8,439.99 WATER 554.18 WATER 13.41 WATER 2,308.44 WATER 9,369.63 WATER 107.59 WATER 173,688.50 196,386.55* SEWER 294.94 SEWER 2,928.00 SEWER 45,086.56 Date: 10/14/2005 Time: 07:23:24 • Operator: JAL Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 75094 0 0 0 • Description Dept Amount ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC SBC, INC. SHOREVIEW, CITY OF W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE SEWER QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN SEWER PARTS /SERVICE PUMPS 1 & SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE SEWER Total for Dept 495 0 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SER CONSULTING HOURS /AUAR OTHER 0 E. H. RENNER & SONS, I CONTRACTOR WELL #5 OTHER 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING FOR BIDS OTHER 0 REED BUSINESS INFORMAT ADVERTISING /WELL #5 OTHER 0 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICK 135W /LAKE - SEPTEMBER OTHER 0 T.K.D.A. 2005 SURFACE WATER /AUGUS OTHER 0 URS CORPORATION AUAR /SEPTEMBER OTHER 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR OTHER Total for Dept 499 554.17 4.47 727.31 9,362.20 248.55 59,206.20* 5,308.41 20,178.00 110.40 177.76 49,161.89 21,442.35 17,598.18 187.50 114,164.49* Grand Total 714,520.83* • • • Centennial Fire District Check Register 10/13/2005 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 10/13/2005 14919 10/13/2005 14920 10/13/2005 14921 10/13/2005 14922 10/13/2005 14923 10/13/2005 14924 10/13/2005 14925 10/13/2005 14926 10/13/2005 14927 10/13/2005 14928 10/13/2005 14929 10/13/2005 14930 10/13/2005 14931 10/13/2005 14932 10/13/2005 14933 10/13/2005 14934 10/13/2005 14935 10/13/2005 14936 10/13/2005 14937 10/13/2005 14938 10/13/2005 14939 Aspen Mills Centennial Firefighter's Relief Assoc. City of Lino Lakes Comcast Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Frattallone's Hardware Kelly Demarest Loffler Business Systems Lynn Card Company Main Floral McLeod USA Metro Fire Mike T. Peterson Nextel Qwest Summit Fire Protection Verizon Wireless Xcel Energy Arthur Mohler City of Lino Lakes Meghan Page Total ACCOUNT 42120 - Uniform Expense 43010 - Relief Association 41000 - Payroll Expenses 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 42120 - Uniform Expense 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42240 - Telephone 42130 - Equipment Expense 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 42240 - Telephone 42240 - Telephone 42110 - Other Maintenance 42240 - Telephone 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense AMOUNT 210.32 6,935.00 66,450.20 95.00 2,483.62 78.74 119.48 14.79 132.04 74.56 361.08 464.27 33.79 145.52 221.52 365.00 94.21 648.74 65.98 90.00 84.50 79,168.36 • • • AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE October 24, 2005 TOPIC Consider Resolution 05 -157 Authorizing the Certification of Delinquent Water and Sewer Utility Charges for collection with 2005 Property Taxes Payable in 2006 VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority (3/5) Staff periodically brings before the City Council delinquent water and sewer utility charges for certification to the County Auditor for collection with the following year property taxes. Affected property owners received mailed notice of this proceeding and have been allowed ample time to pay the delinquent charges. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 05 -157 authorizing the certification of delinquent water and sewer utility charges to be collected with 20054 property taxes payable in 2006 at an interest rate of 8% per annum. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 05 -157. 2) Return to staff for further review. 3) Do not adopt Resolution No. 05 -157. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -157 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER UTILITY CHARGES FOR COLLECTION WITH THE 2005 PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 2006 WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 401.29 and Section 402.14, Subd. 5, the Clerk has prepared a list of properties having delinquent water and sewer charges to be certified to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the 2005 property taxes, payable in 2006, and WHEREAS, notice of such certification was mailed to affected property owners, and WHEREAS, the City Council has met to consider the certification of such delinquent water and sewer charges. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the Clerk is hereby authorized to certify the delinquent water and sewer charges as indicated on the attached listing to the Anoka County Auditor to be collected with the 2005 property taxes, payable in 2006 at an interest rate of 8.00% per annum. Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor CITY OF LINO LAKES 10/14/2005 2005 CERTIFICATION LIST J 0 0. W U Q 0. N 0 z 0 0 0 0- 0) 0) M Is 01 243.8 co tV < CO O o CO tC N N < co N N M N 11 347.80 265.87 CO ty oo tD 1__ 472.35 325.45 199.32 1,033.42 0 < 0) 0 N co 255.74 '_ - 526.55 748.46 358.30 734.60 O c4.' N O r n t0 M O) 1.'i 0. 358.30 510.871 0) O N 655.631 670.80 104! < N 511.551 337.93 e<tO M M co CD to ID tD 2,928.04 0 0 0- OM 0 M CO 0 0) 0 m O O 0 M A 30.0C 01 30.00 0 O co 30.00 O O M O O M O O M 1 30.00 0 O M O O M O O co 30.00 O O M 0 0 CO 0 O M 30.001 30.001 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 0 O 0) 0 O M 30.00 0 0 O co 30.001 30.001 30.001 0 0 0) CO 0 0 0) M 213.8 462.8! 1 678.3! CD N N 404.2 i M co 317.80 4D N in 442.35 1 295.45 en 1,003.42 m 1` CO 794.99 225.74 ) O a co 0. 328.30' 704.60 4) O 0) 01 0. 10 CO O D) o t0 328.30 480.87 0) 0) M 625.631 00. o CD r N 481.551 1 307.931 O 7 M 0 I1�Di tD CD 10 � 2,898.04 07 -31 -22-43 -0027 18- 31 -22 -33 -0028 18- 31 -22 -33 -0027 18- 31 -22 -34 -0023 18- 31 -22 -34 -0024 07- 31 -22 -34 -0023 07- 31 -22 -34 -0067 07- 31 -22 -43 -0005 07- 31 -22 -42 -0022 07- 31 -22 -43 -0048 08-31-22-14-0038 08- 31 -22 -14 -0042 08-31-22-12-0056 07 -31 -22-43 -0067 08- 31 -22 -11 -0054 08- 31 -22 -12 -0087 07-31-22-32-0071 O_ O co N M o� 0 08- 31 -22 -13 -0077 08-31-22-13-0016 - 1 08- 31 -22 -13 -0148 1 08- 31 -22 -12 -0018 N 0 N N N f? co 0 08-31-22-13-0128 1 0 < co N M O' 07- 31 -22 -32 -0026 1 19- 31 -22 -12 -0056 0 0 C d N N N M co 17- 31 -22 -33 -0012 19- 31 -22 -31 -0028 19- 31 -22 -31 -0029 19- 31 -22 -11 -0034 19-31-22-11-0016 19- 31 -22 -11 -0027 < 0 4) < N 10 < 104) 4) < 100 0 < 40') 4) < 100 4) < 40) 4) < 40) 4) < 40) 10 < 40) 4) < 40) 4) < 104) 4) . 40') 4) ^ 100 14) ^ N 4) < 100 4) < 100 4) < u0') 4) < 44) CO el 40) 4) • 100 4) ^ 104) 4) < 104) 14) < 110) 4) < 144)) 14) < 100 10 < 40) 4) V 40) 4) < 140) 14) < 110) 4) < 100 4) < 100 4) < 40) 4) < 100 4) <o 44) 4) z Z Z z Z Z Z z z z z z z z z z Z Z z z Z Z Z- Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 1_LinoLakes. Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 1 Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes -1 Lino Lakes 1 N Y J O C J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes __ 1 Lino Lakes Lino Lakes___ 1 Lino Lakes B Behm Lane 31Heather Court 3 Heather Court ? Lea Court Lea Court i Lilac Street I Palomino Lane C 10 J 8 0 ttl a C CO J E o t0 a Palomino Lane 179th Street 79th Street "Highland Drive > O . O' = 'Appaloosa Lane Nancy Drive c CO . O ¢ Century Trail Lois Lane Lois Lane ; 0 a = Marilyn Drive Marilyn Drive ; O >•C 'C Oak Lane Savanna Court C 4 J 0 E> p c . N 7018 Caribou Circle 473tForsham Lake Drive 151 JGlenview Avenue 155 Glenview Avenue 7135 Gray Heron Drive 71441Gray Heron Drive 7171 Gray Heron Drive - 10D - n (D 0 ro CV 0 '- (N- 10. 0) 0 c0 CD O n t0 n O CO 0 CO 0^ 10 CO CD 4)) CO Om 625 680 M CO < 1O CO C) 0) CO M 0 O0) 10 rn N 4) < I (PETER) DANG VANG ROBERT & CARRIE VANREESE 1 JACK & JULIE FOBAIRE DANIEL LARUMBE (CASEL) PATRICK MCCREADY GEORGE & EMILY WILSON DAVE & BARBARA PERKINS JOHN & KELLI HOFMANN GARY & ANNETTE KIRCHNER STEPHEN & ANN ROMAN TIMOTHY & ANDREA BRANDL TOM VUE JEREOMY & NINA FISKEWOLD JASON & TERINA PETERSON MICHAEL & ROSALIE MILLER GARY & LYNNE SCHMIDT LOR & CHA FONG YANG BRADLEY & STACY SANDERS PATRICK & KELLY CONLIN JASON & TINA NOWLING KAI &THERESA HAUGLID CATHERINE & ROBERT GREEN JOHN & KIM ANDERSON BRIANNA & GREGORY HOLEMAN ELIZABETH TAMFU JASON & PATRICIA PATE ?EKE OAKS ROY & CAROL MARTIN L L EVENT & BARBARA KURTOGLU 1_ DANIEL BODEKER ACHAEL & MARTHA GAYDOS )AVID & MICHELE E ANDERSON )AVID & KATRINA DICKSON ANDREW & LISA CARVER___ KEVIN & CONNIE SINNA M 0 00 0 N 0 0 M — ID 0) it 102023 0 1021301 to c0 ° O N 0 s- tD 0 r 1105800 0 O 0 — 1(4r�� ^ O — ^ CO - 1 1233301 0 0 r) 1305600 0 10D ,- 40 .- 1420500 1422410 1432400 O M 1435012 1435100 - O co r' N co 0 10 m 20095001F 2049000 c u 0 0 N N 2066000'1 0 O 0) CO N O 0) 0) N 0 O 0 N < .., u. t` CO 0) O N CO < 4) 0 h co 0) O N N fV N N N N N N c7 tNh M N 0. IN., 0) h (V 427.801 258.88 1i7 CO O O 0) (0 468.571 1 321.89 O N N O CO O ' 140.551 464.87 to 0 V CO CO V N N O 0) CO 127.401 )O 0 0 M 231.811 co h 1, P. CO CO 255.741 1,025.73 co ) °O O) N '^V C) 0 O M O O (07 O o 0 O M 0 M O 0 M 30.00 30.00 30.00 O M 1 30.00 O oo) 30.00 O O M 30.00. O (0) 0 O M 0 O (0 0 o M 1 30.00 0 O M 30.001 100OS O O M 0 O M O O M 691.52 M ,- 397.80 228.88 tD M 439.90 438.57 0) co w N (0 o n J co V u) (O c .- 434.87 459.51 355.65 r N (N0 )ri t VO', 1- O 277.95 c0 0 743.76 0 co ^ 225.741 CO T 0) to. o.. e- P. 0 M N 480.471 357.541 19- 31 -22 -11 -0010 19- 31 -22 -11 -0022 19- 31 -22 -11 -0070 19- 31 -22 -11 -0126 19- 31 -22 -14 -0004 19- 31 -22 -21 -0020 19- 31 -22 -33 -0012 19- 31 -22 -21 -0075 17- 31 -22 -34 -0007 19- 31 -22 -23 -0035 19- 31 -22 -24 -0092 1 19- 31 -22 -24 -0127 19- 31 -22 -22 -0017 19- 31 -22 -21 -0042 19- 31 -22 -32 -0023 19- 31 -22 -13 -0028 19- 31 -22 -12 -0078 20- 31 -22 -22 -0030 31- 31 -22 -34 -0005 30- 31 -22 -24 -0029 31 -31 -22-43 -0007 31- 31 -22 -13 -0032 N O O V N N C M 30- 31 -22 -24 -0046 30- 31 -22 -24 -0045 In O O co N M O M V O 4) V O t0!) V O 10[) V O ((0) V O LO V O CO V O 1f) V O 1) V O (0 V V O O U 4) V O ( V O to V O 1. 0) V O t00 V O 4) V O tO V o (4) N (4) V O 10O V O t[) V O 10) V O If) V 0 10) V Fri 1) V O H Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y J C J Lino Lakes Y J C _.i Y CO G J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 0) Y J C J Lino Lakes 1 N Y J C J Lino Lakes 1 Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes N N Al J 0 E J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Grav Heron Drive IIGrav Heron Drive Ivy Ridge Court -1Ivv Ridge Court Lake Drive Mourning Dove Road Road ISmoketree Lane IStagecoach Trail Sunrise Drive Sunrise Drive Sunrise Drive ISunrise Drive Sunrise Drive ISunset Avenue Ulmer Drive Elm Street 0 i 0 0 o < Ash Street Egret Lane Hodgson Road Linda Avenue Linda Lane tl) SR c 3 .0) a Pelican Place Pelican Place o 0 o in White Pine Road White Pine Road Woodridge Lane Arrowhead Drive Arrowhead Drive Arrowhead Drive Birch Street Deerwood Trail _ Fox Road Hawthorn Road Hokah Drive Hokah Drive 1- h 0)) 1` CO n (OD n 7080 7128 1() 0) 7273 7033 7034 7052 OOi 1• r 6964 206 302 452 155 123 6007 260 348 6649 6653 6673 350 84 182 128 507 532 CO 0 N V O O ((0 et 773 0 0) Kf 0 N CCD O 0 (VD i1 CC ATDIr`G AIPIFRFrII IAAv V ZV) J O Y 0 Z W w V 0 = li CO) < o W Z w W Z W 0 < n 0 o6 -3 F- Z w ° 0 1- ILI W Y a w W z> O < W N = Z w <_ � Z ° d > ° w vi M O 0 0 - o J 0 0 0 F- w O I-- - v D N Z -, w °� Z O ' 0 z 0 0: CO U J J 0.1 0 W W 0 V) W V) Da O t o e aW CC_ = Z W < Q III < w - n W 0 N Z a w> 2 w W fn J LL C F ~ 0 a p < -, w= J M -) CO O CO < J N 0 ~ V. g W ° g 2 y 0 0 O < < 2 5 W 2 m < 3 0. N w Z Q O< ' z y IY < U Z w U < 0 cc g W w Ix U z a 2 Z w < U O J U 2 -1 < [D Y Kf w Z � Z O'O< ' S ' 0 -) Y C D: 0 U g w I)- Z W -3 a J ') ° W = W V wN W a 0 2 Z 2 Z O ' Ill m a W 1L o W III wz Li_ C .1 G -4 w W k < O 2 GLEN & ANNA OLSON 0 0 ) CO O f CO J N 0 O 0 0 0 h CO N 0 0 0 0 In 0 0) N � N N N N (..,, M 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0) O N CO CD t0 CO N N N N N N V O !D 0 tO CO N N f_ O o o V � 0) 0) N N N N v 0 (°D 0 .- °o N O tO h CO t• 0 N (O 0 N tO 0 0 N M M M V O O N N N N M M °o °o CO n N CO V IO O O M M °o O 1O r co (0 CO O O M (+) - N 0 0 0 0 0 0 I() 0 0 0 O 0 (00 V O O (D (D (. 0 CO t0 0) O M O O O M M CO CO (8) CO 7 0 Iq O V 0 0 0 1C0) 0 N O O N M V R 0 0 tO (D ' 0 c 0) (c V r O C 4209000 O O N M lO (O W O O N M V LL) (D h 00 CO O N M et CO CO CO CO V V V et V V V et et 'Cr 10 1) tO LO O 11) O !O CD 0 0 (0 (0 tO (0 (D CO (D CO 0 N. n 1. a, 0) cC oa Oi •^ 01 255.7, 01 885.4; 400. ' D 288.9: 00) cr'1 0) ^ 0 C 0 T 0 0 1f) 00 co N 0) ^ N 894.63 596.83 820.18 co- ui 40 R 0) r h m 0 T CD O O 0 d' O M 0) O O h N n 10 M O N (0 O tD 0 1O O t� 0 In n M < `7 0) D) o0 0 0 O 0) 10 R (D 0) (0 0) N 10 O M CO 10 03 10 D) O M 541.541 04 N In 0 N (D 0) 0) 0) O OOi, Q O 0 0 O h 842.25 O O 0 CO aC 703.47 255.59 r I 30.0 0 0 10 O M .� O M ... o M o o0 'J O o - 10'00 O M O M J 30.0( O M O M O M o oo 00'00 o 0 CO O O O M O 0 o M 30.00 O 0 O M O O O M O 0 O M O 0 0 CO 30.00 O O O M O O O 40 O O O M O O O (0 O O 0 M O O O CO O O 0 40 O O O M O O o M O O o CO O O C M 30.00 O 0 (0 0 CO 0 • 0 T 225.7! 855.4: N 343.90 Oni 4 0 O N 0 T 503.20 249.80 f` 4 4)) CO O (0 O 0) 775.78 N 0 01 0 T 460.061 868.301 357.27 637.26 680.55 0 co co 860.44 [ 478.66 0 cri (0 0 1,606.521 339.581 y ,- T O 585.28 (00 0 O) N O 00 0) co (00 4) N o3 N (0D 0) 0) C Pi 0 225.591 29- 31 -22 -32 -0035 29- 31 -22 -32 -0012 29- 31 -22 -23 -0014 29- 31 -22 -43 -0052 O N 0 9 N 7 N 0) 29- 31 -22 -33 -0028 29- 31 -22 -33 -0039 32- 31 -22 -22 -0003 29 -31 -22-43 -0021 29 -31 -22-43 -0022 32- 31 -22 -24 -0010 28- 31 -22 -13 -0115 28- 31 -22 -13 -0002 28- 31 -22 -13 -0035 28- 31 -22 -24 -0086 21- 31 -22- 43-0031 28 -31 -22-42 -0045 28- 31 -22 -13 -0019 28 -31 -22-42 -0080 cD N O of N M N (O 0 N a N M N 28- 31 -22 -42 -0012 28 -31 -22-42 -0011 33- 31 -22 -11 -0037 27- 31 -22 -13 -0016 28- 31 -22 -14 -0027 27- 31 -22 -12 -0030 27- 31 -22 -21 -0050 33- 31 -22 -11 -0015 25- 31 -22 -12 -0006 25 -31 -22-44 -0016 25- 31 -22 -44 -0018 1 25- 31 -22 -13 -0037 25-31-22-13-0041 25- 31 -22 -13 -0068 25- 31 -22 -31 -0011 O 9 N N M 04 N 25- 31 -22 -43 -0019 25- 31 -22 -42 -0077 0 0 7 0 0 dt. 0 0 V- 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 a' 0 0 eft 0 0 V- 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 C 0 0 V 0 0 eft 0 0 ? 0 0 V 0 0 .d- 0 0 ^ 0 0 ^ 0 0 ^ 0 0 O 0 0 4 0 0 ^ •0 0 O 0 0 V 0 0 0) 0 0 0) 0) 0 40 0 0 N 0 0 N 0) 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 O 0 0 1D 0 0 N 0 0 a0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z Z Z Lino Lakes 0 J O 0 Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 0 Y (0 J C J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 0 Y (0 J 0 'J Lino Lakes 0 Y O J G J 0 Y ((pp J C J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes y y O J 0 - 1 Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes C) Y CO C . J 0 Y J 0 .J Lino Lakes 0 O Y J 0 J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes 1 D) Y CO 0 J 0 Y CO 0 J 0 Y CO 0 J Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes Lino Lakes y N CO 2 J Hokah Drive Hokah Drive Hokah Drive Ironwood Circle Lonesome Pine Trail Rice Court Totem Trail Ware Road W. Shadow Lake Drive W. Shadow Lake Drive C O o = Birch Street Black Duck Drive Stack Duck Drive E. Shadow Lake Court E. Shadow Lake Drive Killdeer Court Pheasant Run Pheasant Run S. Red Birch Court tamarack Lane 01 C ..�.1 19 E F Tamarack Lane C N o = pheasant Hills Drive tufed Geouse Court Sherman Lake Road d U c r Wrenn() Piont Clearwater Creek Court I _iearwater Creek Drive learwater Creek Drive N J y ele Lane We Lane Tart Lake Road Tart Lake Road Langer Lane Langer Lane ((0 (0O N O 1 6401 8 (MD (�O 8) (O M 0) N e- n (O (O CO CO (O (O 0 (O (D CO N (D 1064 O OD 6550 N ((0 N 1057 -, 0 0)) •-- (MD ems- 0, •' 1428 •0V CO n r- 22071C Fy- Co N (0O h cDD 0 0 ((DD 0 N 10D 2366 CO 0 CO CO 6533 THOMAS & STEPHANIE SEVERSON ROBERT & CYNTHIA HANZALIK 1RANDY & DEBBIE LUCKOW SCOTT & TAMI LARSON GREORY & KRISTIN HOWARD R. SINGERHOUSE GERALD & DIANE BERG CHRISTOPHER & LINDA KOLAR GENE & DAWN PAGEL ROY HENLINE RONALD & TAMI JOHNSON JOHN & LISA MACNEIL ROBERT & THERESE MATYKIEWICZ JIM & ROBIN HEIDEMANN DENISE MILBRADT EUGENE & LYDIA WELSCH DEWAYNE & PATRICIA NORBERG GERALD & SUZANNE BAKKE GARY KORF JR. GARY & LORI SCHILTZ ROGER & MICHELLE NALEZNY 5208000ITIMOTHY & RITA CHILSTROM 52090001 WIES & SONYA IES 1 6026300 JAMES & CARON LINDGREN 6041000ITIMOTHY & LUANN BURGER JJENNIFER L MCCORKLE MICHAEL & MARIAM GRAFF 0 10 W FS Z S 0 61504011DOUGLAS &SHARIGRONE 7049811ICHRISTOPHER & VICTORIA LOKEN 7065800IHAROLD & JODI BUDDE ANTHONY & NELLIE COLLOVA BRETT &ELIZABETHWILLIAMS PATRICK KATHLEEN GINTER RAYMOND & TRACY NELSON RICHARD & PATRICIA CARLSON RICHARD AKANDE DAVID & MELISSA STANUIS TOM & PAMELA RILEY 5 422001 0 3 422700 0 II____ 4228500 3 4241500 1 4279500 0 M v 1 4364000 43690101 4384500 7 4412430 0 QO 8 1 5030500 5031400 5084000 5110500 00 0 r !D o 0 10 N 0 1n 0 0 DO) !D 5204500 0 — H CD 0 (0 n c(0 0 0 O (0 0 100 o 0 0 •,,r o 0. 7071250 0 N 0 0 ,- 0 1- 0 N n 1 __ 7246000 p (M+) Lo 4- 1� n R n m m m m • 10 CO h W 0) 0 • _ N CO R 10 (D 1- 0 0 0 0 O) O O O O O O O O O 0 T e- • • co 0 O O O M CP 0 0 25 -31 -22-42 -0014 25 -31 -22-41 -0060 0 0 z z Albert Court d L co CD LO 0) N MICHAEL HEINEN & SARAH BATES F- w w m O w Q 0 0 1- 0 N 0 0 '7 0 N O O 08- 31 -22 -13 -0168 08- 31 -22 -13 -0168 N 0 J LL z z Miami Lakes 0) 0) J 0 J Main Street, #121 0 0 MICHELLE AMANKWAH- final 4 /4/05 ROBERT SCHWEICH JR. uo pN 0 0 CV M O M CD CND M 08- 31 -22 -13 -0142 08- 31 -22 -13 -0142 ao (8) 0 Z C O 0) co U N 0) co -J 8 J P.O. Box 463 0 DEBRA O'BRIEN -final 6/30/05 r t0 0 99915 - 091001 99915- 091001 N 0 C 0 t/! 0) co 0 J N Y co O J (0 CO -J F a CO E a N N THOMAS THOMPSON -final 5/16/05 DIANE FLEWELLEN O N M O N M 99915 - 098001 99915 -098001 u1 cq 81)) 0 (!O) 0 Z 0) m J 0) 0) (-uo 0) co -J C J Potomac Street NE (0 -J E a M M w 0 CO Q w 0 GLENN MAURITZ CO N M co N N O O Om N 28- 31 -22 -12 -0039 28- 31 -22 -12 -0039 O 0 0 0 CD cr C Diamond SpurStreet Black Duck Drive OD n N n 0 ROBERT BEST -final 8/31/04 CHAD & APRIL MOTZ N 0 co 0 O N O O N 28- 31 -22 -12 -0021 28- 31 -22 -12 -0021 0 N 0 00 co -J 0 J a co c 0 Black Duck Drive co 0) CD 0 CONCETTA HOULE 7 M COD 0 M CV N O O M N c0 25 -31 -22-41 -0034 25 -31 -22-41 -0034 co co N Z 2 Z 2 0) J J 0 J 0 J (moo m m F 0 0 m -J CO F M N ANDREW & GAYLE RUTE -final 8/18/05 0 EC CC w M N ti 6')) RENTAL PROPERTY O O co c- oo 08- 31 -22 -12 -0061 CO 0) Z 2 co 0 J H n ro CC C 0 0 z Z U 0 S N D) 4.- N ME'CHELLE WILLIAMS -final 7/31/05 ALAN & SHAWN PEARSON -owner 4.8) CD CO M NI 0 M N 0 OD O co CO CV M 08- 31 -22 -12 -0030 0 0 M N CD 10 0 > O C (0 2 Monroe Street C3 NJ N ANDREA GAGNER TSM DEVELOPMENT -owner N N 4- O 0 M N O 08- 31 -22 -12 -0038 0 0 O to 0 Z 2 Z Monroe Street W N JAMIE KUDAK TSM DEVELOPMENT -owner N N O N CV 08- 31 -22 -13 -0136 e0- N 0) CD 0 Z 2 J Y to -J O J O' L 0 10 0 O N 4k 0 !n n r co N WILEY MCLAURIN HUE DOAN -owner 0 N • m M 07- 31 -22 -32 -0060 O M h Brooklyn Park O C a Berwick Knoll CD DORYENE UHDE CENTURY FARM N. DEV INC.-owner O CO 20- 31 -22 -22 -0112 O N O '4, N .1 2 U cr DAVID SWANSON -owner N 01 N O O N CO N O v 30 -31 -22-41 -0036 R to to O u'•) 2 Ware Circle O M N N RICHARD KIELSA U) 0 0 0 U_ 2 U Z w 2 0 w N 0)) Om 0 go- 0) M 0) O C m 27 -31 -22-44 -0033 O 1� O 10 Z Z 2 J J 0) 0) C U O 0 a C 0 0) 7',12) U 3 i0 U' 0) 0) N JUNE ROOSE m G 0 U_ 2 U Z w 2 0 m O CD O O 0 co CO r 0 C M CD Cc) 25- 31 -22 -12 -0026 O N co co '4)) u) Z J J d •0 0 s 00) 0 a`1 d U Clearwater Creek Drive a CD a n O 2 0 m m 0 cc BLAKE ANDERSON -owner O O 1` J 0 -26- • • • AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE October 24, 2005 TOPIC Consider Resolution 05 -158 Calling a Public Hearing Regarding the Issuance of Revenue Notes For The Benefit Of YMCA VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority The City of Lino Lakes is involved in a partnership with the YMCA of Greater St. Paul for the construction of a YMCA facility in the Legacy at Woods Edge development. The YMCA has made a request to the City to issue tax exempt financing of a portion of the project cost. Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, authorizes the City to issue tax exempt revenue bonds or notes to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment, or extension of a project constituting any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit. The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul has proposed that the City issue tax - exempt revenue Notes or obligations in one or more series in the approximate principal amount not to exceed $3,000,000 and loan the proceeds of the Notes to the Borrower to finance the construction and equipping of an approximately 37,000 square feet recreational facility. The YMCA has made application for such financing in accordance with the City's Tax- Exempt Financing Policy and has submitted the appropriate application fee. The YMCA has requested the waiver of the 1% administrative fee outlined in the policy in consideration of the City -YMCA partnership. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.154, subdivision 4 and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, prior to undertaking the financing of the Project, the City is required to conduct a public hearing with respect to the proposed financing of the Project. Resolution 05 -158 calls for the City Council to meet at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, November 28, 2005, to conduct a public hearing on the Project and issuance of the Notes as requested by the YMCA. It is staff's recommendation that the City Council approve Resolution 05 -158 setting a public hearing on the Project and issuance of the Notes requested by the YMCA. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 05 -158. 2. Refer to Staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 05 -158. RECOMMENDATION' Option 1 • • • follows: RESOLUTION NO. 05 -158 RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE NOTES FOR THE BENEFIT OF YMCA OF GREATER SAINT PAUL UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152- 469.165 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City ") as Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, as amended (the "Act "), authorizes the City to issue revenue bonds or notes to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, bettei ment, or extension of a project constituting any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit. 1.02. YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Borrower ") has proposed that the City issue tax - exempt revenue Notes or obligations pursuant to the Act in one or more series in the approximate principal amount not to exceed S3,000,000 (the "Notes ") and loan the proceeds of the Notes to the Borrower to finance the construction and equipping of an approximately 37,000 square feet recreational facility (the "Project ") to be constructed on and located at Lot 1, Block 1, The Village No. 3 addition in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. 1.03. Pursuant to Section 469.154, subdivision 4, of the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, prior to undertaking the financing of the Project, the City is required to conduct a public hearing with respect to the proposed financing of the Project. Section 2. Public Hearing and DEED Application. 2.01. The City Council shall meet at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, November 28, 2005, to conduct a public hearing on the Project and issuance of the Notes therefor as requested by the Borrower. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.154 of the Act, prior to issuance of the Notes by the City, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development ( "DEED ") must approve the Project on the basis of an application submitted by the City with all required attachments and exhibits (the "DEED Application "). 2.03. Prior to submitting the DEED Application to the Commissioner of DEED requesting approval of the Project, the Council must conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project and a notice of such public hearing must be published at least once, not less than fourteen (14) days, nor more than thirty (30) days, prior to the date fixed for the hearing in the official newspaper of the City (and a newspaper of general circulation in the City if the official newspaper is not a newspaper of general circulation in the City). 2.04. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing, in substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT A to this resolution, in the Quad Community Press, the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general circulation in the City. • • The notice shall be published at least once, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the public hearing but not more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 2.05 In accordance with Section 469.154 of the Act, the City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to cause a draft copy of the DEED Application, together with drafts of all required attachments and exhibits, to be prepared by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel. The DEED Application, together with all attachments and exhibits, shall be made available for public inspection in the office of the City Administrator during regular business hours of the City. The City Administrator and other officers, employees, attorneys, and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide DEED with any information needed for this purpose, and the City Administrator is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project. Section 3. Official Intent. 3.01. Section 1.150 -2 of the Treasury Regulations, as amended, requires a declaration of intent to reimburse an original expenditure with proceeds of tax- exempt obligations prior to the issuance of such obligations in order to allocate such expenditures to the proceeds of such obligations. 3.02. The City Council hereby declares its preliminary intention to issue the Notes for the Project, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of the Act and final agreement between the City, the Borrower, and the initial purchaser of the Notes as to the terms and conditions thereof. The Borrower intends to make expenditures for the Project and the City and the Borrower intend to reimburse the Borrower for such expenditures from the proceeds of the Notes. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent, for purposes of Section 1.150 -2 of the Treasury Regulations, with respect to certain original expenditures made from any sources other than the proceeds of the Notes, in conjunction with the Project. 3.03. The law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered is authorized to act as bond counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the Notes to be issued in connection therewith. The City Administrator and other officers, employees, and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist bond counsel in the preparation of such documents. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) • Approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 24th day of October, 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE NOTES PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469.165, FOR THE BENEFIT OF YMCA OF GREATER SAINT PAUL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City ") will conduct a public hearing on Monday, November 28, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. at 600 Town Center Parkway in the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, to consider a proposal by YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Borrower "), for the issuance of revenue Notes (the "Notes ") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, as amended, to finance a proposed project consisting of the construction and equipping of an approximately 37,000 square -foot recreation facility located at Lot 1, Block 1, The Village No. 3 addition in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. The facilities proposed to be financed will be owned by the Borrower. At the public hearing, the City Council will consider adoption of a resolution giving approval to the issuance of the Notes for the Proj ect. At the public hearing, the City Council will consider adoption of a resolution approving the Project and giving preliminary approval to the issuance of revenue notes to finance the costs of the Project. The aggregate face amount of revenue notes proposed to be issued to finance the Project is presently estimated not to exceed $3,000,000. The revenue notes will be issued by the City and will constitute a limited obligation of the City payable solely from the revenues expressly pledged to the payment thereof, and will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by the taxing power of the City or any assets or property of the City except interests in the Project that may be granted to the City in conjunction with this financing. A draft copy of the application to the Minnesota Depai truent of Employment and Economic Development for approval of the Project is on file with the City and is available for public inspection in the office of the City Administrator during regular business hours. Anyone desiring to be heard during the public hearing will be afforded an opportunity to do so. Dated: [date of publication] LN 140 -091 (JAE) 267126v.1 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL By /s/ Gordon Heitke City Administrator City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • AGENDA ITEM ID STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Approve Application for Blue Heron Elementary PTO to Conduct Excluded Bingo VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Under Minnesota Statute 349.166, excluded bingo may be conducted by an organization that conducts four or fewer bingo occasions in a calendar year, or in connection with a county fair, the state fair, or a civic celebration if it is not conducted for more than 12 consecutive days. Blue Heron Elementary holds only this one gambling event. The Blue Heron Elementary PTO is requesting approval to hold its 2nd annual "Back to School Family Bingo Night ". This "Turkey Bingo" event will be held at Blue Heron Elementary School, 405 Elm Street, on Thursday, November 17, 2005. There is no license fee involved and there will be no charge to play bingo, however, canned items for the food shelf will be requested, but not required. This event is funded by the Anoka County Children and Family Services Collaborative. City policy requires a background investigation each time a permit or license application is received. The Lino Lakes Police Department conducted an investigation and found no reason to deny the application. The application, a certificate of non - profit status from the Secretary of State's office and the results of the background check are on file in the city clerk's office. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the request to conduct the bingo event. 2. Deny the request. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 • • • AGENDA ITEM 1 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution 05 -164 Summary of Ordinance 05 -05 for Publication ACTION: 4/5 BACKGROUND The City Council approved the second reading of Ordinance 05 -05 on October 10. This amended the sign ordinance. Under state law and the city charter, the ordinance must be published in the official newspaper. The approved ordinance is very lengthy. State law and the charter allow for the publication of a summary of the ordinance. Minnesota Statutes 412.191 provide that the city council may by a four -fifths vote of its members direct that only the title of the ordinance and a summary be published. The summary must be an intelligible synopsis of the essential elements of the ordinance. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 05 -164, approving the summary of Ordinance 05 -05 for publication. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -164 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 -05 FOR PUBLICATION WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 05 -05, amending the sign ordinance, on October 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 05 -05 is lengthy and MN statute 412.191 provides for a city to publish a summary of an ordinance, and WHEREAS, the City Council detennines that the summary clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance, and WHEREAS, the publication in the official newspaper will include a notice that a full printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council approves the summary in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City Charter. 411 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October; 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • ATTACHMENT A, RESOLUTION 05 -164 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05-05 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 12 -97 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SIGNS IN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SECTION I. PURPOSE AND INTENT SECTION II. DEFINITIONS SECTION III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS A. "R" Rural District and "R -X" Rural Executive Residential District B. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: R -1, R -1X, R -2, R -3, R -4, R -6, R -7 C. BUSINESS DISTRICTS all signs must comply with the requirements in table in Section IV, paragraphs EE and FF. D. INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS all signs must comply with the requirements in tables in Section IV, paragraphs EE and FF. E. "R -BR" RURAL BUSINESS RESERVE DISTRICT SECTION IV. GENERAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRICTS A. — DD. EE. Temporary Sign Requirements Table FF. Permanent Sign Requirements Table Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council on October 10, 2005. This is a summary of the adopted ordinance. A full printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall and the full ordinance is on the City's website at www.ci.lino - lakes.mn.us. • • • AGENDA ITEM 3 A STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 10 October 2005 24 October 2005 SUBJECT Council Salaries VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 — Roll Call Vote BACKGROUND This is the second reading of Ordinance Every four years, the city council has been asked to consider the maintenance of their own salaries. Per statute, this is considered before the election, before that year the increases are to take place. At the council's 21 September work session, I provided the council with the 2005 Elected Officials Salary Survey — a study produced by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. It appeared as though the Mayor's salary was 5% below market and council salaries were 8.8% below market. The market for our purposes is cities with populations between 10,000 and 20,000. I was asked to provide council with additional information (prior 4 year Ordinance 07- 97) and the question was raised regarding pay for special meetings. Ordinance 07 -97 was provided. In 1991, the council amended the city code to add a $40.00 per additional meeting charge up to two meeting per month. In 1997, that was amended to include 4 extra meetings per month. I have factored the $40.00 council members receive for attending council work session meetings and re- calculated the figures which now indicate a market adjustment is not necessary. In which case I would recommend that an Ordinance for council pay for years 2007 -2010 be adopted which would increase council salaries by 3% for each year which will maintain council salaries at a marketable rate. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Ordinance Number 10 — 05 adjusting council salaries by 3% for the years 2007 -2010. 2. Return to staff for additional consideration. RECOMMENDATION Number One. Councilmember introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 10 -05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY SETTING THE SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. The City Code of the City of Lino lakes, Section 203.01 Subdivision 1 is amended as follows: Pursuant to the provision and allowance of Minnesota State statute 415.11, the salary of the Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes shall be six thousand four hundred fifty four dollars ($6,454) and the salary of each council member shall be five thousand one hundred sixty three dollars ($5,163) for the year beginning January 1, 2007. YEAR MAYOR COUNCIL 2007 $6,454 $5,163 2007 has been adjusted down by 3% from 2006. II. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2007 Passed by the City Council of Lino Lakes this day of , 2005 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 10 -05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY INCREASING THE SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. The City Code of the City of Lino lakes, Section 203.01 Subdivision 1 is amended as follows: Pursuant to the provision and allowance of Minnesota State statute 415.11, the salary of the Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes shall be six thousand six hundred fifty four dollars ($6,654) and the salary of each council member shall be five thousand three hundred twenty three dollars ($5,323) for the year beginning January 1, 2007. Salaries for each subsequent three (3) years shall be as follows. II/ YEAR MAYOR COUNCIL 2007 $6,654 $5,323 2008 $6,853 $5,483 2009 $7,059 $5,647 2010 $7,270 $5,817 These salaries have been adjusted to reflect a 3% annual increase. II. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2007 Passed by the City Council of Lino Lakes this day of , 2005 ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 3 B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 24 October 2005 SUBJECT Crime Prevention Specialist VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND In September of last year, the city added a Volunteer Coordinator in the Public Safety Department. Chief Pecchia has conducted an evaluation of the position and is requesting the position be reclassified to that of a Crime Prevention Specialist. Not only does this better meet the needs of the department, it also works towards one of the council's 2005 goals to maintain a high level of public safety. In addition to overseeing volunteer activities, this position would be expanded to include coordinating businesses and residents on crime prevention efforts. Activities would include, but not be limited to Neighborhood Watch, Park Watch, Merchant Watch, National Night Out and McGruff House. Karen Anderson, our current Volunteer Coordinator has perfoiined well in within the department and meets the requirements of the new position. We recommend this action be effective 1 November 2005. OPTIONS 1. Approve the reclassified position. 2. Deny the reclassification. RECOMMENDATION Number One. AGENDA ITEM 6 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution 05 -159 Adopting the Final AUAR ACTION: 3/5 BACKGROUND We have come to the end of the entire process for the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review. The City Council authorized distributing the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) with Resolution 05 -144. The document was distributed to persons on the EQB's distribution list as well as to any persons who commented on the Draft AUAR. State agencies and the Metropolitan Council had ten days to file an objection to the Final AUAR. No objections were filed. Under MN Rules, "unless no objection is filed...the RGU shall adopt the revised environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation at its first regularly scheduled meeting held 15 or more days after the distribution of the revised document." October 24 is that meeting. Resolution 05 -159 adopts the Final AUAR. The Environmental Board discussed the Final AUAR at a special meeting on October 12. The Board unanimously approved the following statement: The Environmental Board strongly supports the adoption of the final AUAR by the City of Lino Lakes. The mitigation plan within the document serves as an invaluable tool to identify & minimize environmental impact of developments. Adoption of the AUAR should not be interpreted or misconstrued as endorsing an aggressive development scenario. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 05 -159, adopting the Final AUAR. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -159 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE I -35E CORRIDOR FINAL ALTERNTATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW WHEREAS, the City Council, as the Responsible Governmental Unit, authorized the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) with Resolution 05 -51; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a the I -3 5E Corridor Draft AUAR document and the City Council authorized distribution it for public comment with Resolution 05 -85; and, WHEREAS, the City received comments, prepared responses to substantive comments and prepared a mitigation plan to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects within the AUAR area; and WHEREAS, the City distributed the I -35E Corridor Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review as authorized by the City Council with Resolution 05 -144; and WHEREAS, no objection have been filed by State agencies or the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the entire process has been conducted in accordance with MN Rules 4410; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Board discussed the Final AUAR at a special meeting on October 12, 2005 and unanimously approved supporting the adoption of the Final AUAR by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the I -35E Corridor Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review dated September 26, 2005. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of S 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: i. Resolution No. 05 -153 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: West of I -35E ii. General Concept Plan, Planned Unit Development Village of Hardwood Creek VOTE: •4/5 for Resolution No. 05 -153 •no formal vote needed for concept plan BACKGROUND We have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the comprehensive plan. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a formal vote. The application also includes a general concept plan for a planned unit development. The concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that likely will follow. The 2004 growth management policy (Ordinance 24 -04) was prepared to implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. The amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements. This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does not include the detailed information noinially part of such applications. Because of this, we cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for the exemptions to certain growth management limits as a conservation development. In addition, there are some limits from which we cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as changing the land use designation for the site. Basically, three parts of the plan amendment relate directly to the application: changing the land use, adding MUSA, and addressing the growth management issues. Because the comprehensive plan is a city -wide document, we need to ensure that amendments to the document support future planning needs in this area and elsewhere in the city. • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 2 The suggested text amendments to the comprehensive plan are indicated and appear in a separate font. The proposed land use map change is one of the attachments to the report. The P & Z opened the public hearing on September 14 and continued it to a special meeting on September 27 dealing exclusively with this application. The P & Z voted to recommend adoption of the comprehensive plan amendments described here and listed in Resolution 05 -153. It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD review. ANALYSIS Site Summary: The site comprises 363 acres west of 35E and east of 20th Ave. (see Site Location map). The site has been used for agricultural purposes. There are two existing homes on the site, fronting 20th Ave. Two smaller properties comprising about seven acres form a rectangle along 20th Ave. and are not part of the site at this time. However, this seven acres should be included in the land use change and MUSA if the larger site is to be changed. The following table lists the land uses and zoning on the site. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Rural and Rural Business Reserve Site agriculture, residential Industrial, High- Density Residential, Medium- Density Residential North agriculture, residential Rural and Medium - Density Residential Rural and Rural Business Reserve South townhomes, vacant • Commercial (Lino Lakes) • Commercial and High- Density Residential (Centerville) Rural Business Reserve East 1 -35 E and agricultural 1 -35 E, Industrial Rural West agriculture, residential Low Density Sewered Resid., Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural Business Reserve The comprehensive plan guides the site for industrial, high - density residential, and medium - density residential uses. To the south of the site, 40 acres is in Centerville and is guided for high- density residential and commercial uses in the Centerville comprehensive plan. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The site is zoned Rural and Rural Business Reserve. Details of the proposed land use map and zoning map are attached. • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 3 A number of small wetlands pepper the site, many of which have been farmed. Patches of trees exist around the perimeter of the site. A pipeline runs diagonally through the northeast corner of the site. Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Reserve: The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) is the area within which the City can extend sanitary sewer. Most cities simply map their MUSA. Lino Lakes has land within the mapped MUSA but also has a MUSA reserve. As part of the approval of the comprehensive plan in 2002, the City received additional MUSA reserve acres from the Metropolitan Council. The amount of MUSA reserve was based on the City's estimates of the need for residential and commercial /industrial development. There are only 90 acres remaining in reserve for Stage 1 (pre -2010) residential development and 68.5 acres for commercial/industrial development. The development project site requires 363 acres of additional MUSA. The rectangular exception is about 7 acres, for a total of 370 acres. A request for 370 acres of new MUSA would be part of the amendment submitted to Metropolitan Council for review. Under state statute, every municipality in the Metropolitan Area must have a comprehensive plan, and must submit amendments to the Metropolitan Council for review. The Met Council compares the city's plan to the regional Development Framework, which includes plans for the individual systems over which the Met Council has jurisdiction. These include sanitary sewer treatment, regional open space, transportation, and airports. Control over MUSA is how the Met Council ensures its sewer treatment facility planning is not overburdened or underutilized. Underutilization is wasted capital improvement, and thus poor use of public funds. Growth Management, Number of Units: The growth policy establishes a target for the number of dwelling units that can be platted each year: 147. This works out to a total of 1029 units between 2003 and 2010 (147 x 7 years = 1029). There are 76 units available for year 2007, 147 for 2008, and 147 for 2009. The proposed development area is intended to accommodate 1200 to 1250 dwelling units over six years. This would exceed the 1029 total and the 147 per year. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS The following lists amendments of the comprehensive plan to be considered: (1) The proposed land use plan map must be amended if the application is to be approved. The current designations are Industrial, Medium - Density, and High - Density Residential. This would be changed to guide the entire site for Mixed Use. • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 4 (2) The amendment must include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for the Stage 1 growth area. (3) Even though our comprehensive plan includes Mixed Use on the proposed land use map, there is no description of this land use category in the text of the document. This should be addressed by describing the intent of the Mixed Use category. (4) The growth management ordinance states that an amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year) would be exceeded (Section 2, 7.). It is unlikely that the master plan for this development could proceed within the limits of the target of 147 units per year. (The 1029 units for Stage 1 noted in Section 2, paragraph 5 of the growth policy, is based on 147 x 7 years.) This comprehensive plan amendment would fulfill the requirement of the growth management ordinance. (5) The comprehensive plan itself includes a list of Growth Management Policies, which includes "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory" (page 27). As stated above, this would not accommodate the anticipated development project. This statement should be reviewed to accommodate the potential advantages of master planning large areas. (6) The growth goals described in the comprehensive plan "assume an average of 147 new households annually through the year 2020" (page 63). This statement merits discussion. (1) & (2) Land Use Plan Amendment: Land Uses and MUSA The comprehensive plan includes a "Proposed Land Use" map. The application includes amending that map. Currently, the site includes land guided Industrial (290 acres), Medium Density Residential (45 acres), and High Density Residential (25 acres). The AUAR included a market analysis based on recent development rates in Lino Lakes. There are 1072 acres guided for industrial uses along 35E. At historic rates, it would take well over 100 years to develop all this industrial land. Converting some of this to accommodate the commercial and residential development that would make up the Village of Hardwood Creek project will not prevent industrial growth in the city. • The proposed land use for the site should be changed to Mixed Use, as shown on the attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use Plan (Detail) ". • The amendment should include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for this project. This new MUSA would be applied to the site, not held in the MUSA reserve. The resulting MUSA line is shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 5 (3) & (4) Text Amendment: "Mixed Use" Land Use Category and Addressing the Growth Management Ordinance The comprehensive plan Proposed Land Use Map includes twelve land use categories. The text in the Land Use Plan chapter of the document include discussion of nine of the categories. The three categories not discussed are Public /Semi - Public, Manufactured Home Park, and Mixed Use. The 35W interchange area of the Legacy at Woods Edge and the Marketplace developments are the largest areas guided Mixed Use. The other is the area northwest of the Hodgson/CR J intersection. The Mixed Use category should be described in the text of the comprehensive plan, this project site should be listed, and it should be clear that the growth management policy requirement has been addressed. • The following text be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land Use Plan chapter, on page 97: MIXED USE The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development, as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development project in a Mixed Use area could include only one type of land use, other land use designations are available for development with only one type of land use. Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review. Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than residential development, which raises stormwater management design challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed Use land use designation envisions varied land uses, and recognizes the possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These can best be addressed with extensive environmental review. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited to: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 6 a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without the project c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without the project d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without the project Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following performance standards: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding and uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. 3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available. 4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods whenever feasible. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. West Side of I -35E A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 7 residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to 600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety of single family and multi- family residential development will include approximately 1200 to 1250 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be approximately 4.5 units per acre, when including all land not within the commercial area. While these are the approximate use parameters, the specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach. In the northeast corner of the site, a triangle is formed by 1 -35E, a pipeline, and the property boundary. This area could be designed to accommodate an office campus type use, which could be a suitable and use along the freeway. This would reduce the amount of residential and noted above and increase the commercial land. Such flexibility is appropriate to accommodate what will be determined as the best use of the triangle area. This site is included in the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation plan that forms a part of the AUAR, which includes the Conservation Development Framework as the fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR area. This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan in 2005. This amendment was intended to fulfill the City's growth management policy requirement that amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year) would be exceeded. Text Amendment: Planning District 6 The comprehensive plan breaks the city into planning districts. The Village of Hardwood Creek site is in Planning District 6. The PUD application will be compared to the recommendations listed for Planning District 6. However, some reference to this site and its Mixed Use designation is appropriate. • The following text be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District 6 section, on page 153. West Side of I -35E A 370 -acre development site is located % mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential uses. This site is described in the Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter. The specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 8 (5) Text Amendment: The 147 Statement On Page 27 of Comprehensive Plan The comprehensive plan includes a great number of goals, policies, objectives, recommendations, and strategies. The Policy Plan chapter includes a list of growth management goals and policies. Policy number nine is: "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory." The growth management ordinance, Ord. 24 -04, provides for amending the comprehensive plan if this target is to be exceeded: An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year)...would be exceeded (Section 2, par. 7.). The amendment will include the description of the site in the Mixed Use section, as explained above. However, in order to avoid confusion, it would be advisable to amend the limiting statement itself to provide for the possibility of amendment described in the growth management ordinance. • • The policy on page 27 of the comprehensive plan should be amended to read as follows: 9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may include but is not limited to: s a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without exceeding the target c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the target d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without exceeding the target These four public purpose examples are taken directly from the growth management ordinance. These are listed as potential reasons to justify an amendment of the comp plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 9 if a project would exceed the annual growth target. Incorporating them into the comp plan itself provides consistency between the comprehensive plan and the growth management policy ordinance. (6) Text Review: Demographic Goals The "Local Forecasts" section of the Land Use Plan chapter includes the growth goals for the next decades: households, population, and employment. This statement is found on page 63: "The goals assume an average of 147 new households annually through the year 2020." This statement merits discussion. To amend this statement raises the question of amending the growth projections, an important part of planning the community's future. This will be extensively analyzed and discussed as part of the overall review of the comprehensive plan that must be completed by the end of year 2008. • Therefore, we recommend no amendment to this statement in the comprehensive plan. Conservation Development Issues Stormwater management methods, open space areas, connecting habitat and trail greenways are conservation development elements described in several policy documents. The Parks, Natural Open Space / Greenways and Trail System Plan provides guidance. As an incentive, the growth management policy allows conservation development to be exempt from a number of the growth restrictions. The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the mitigation plan that the Conservation Development Framework is a fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR area. Every project can and must incorporate conservation development design and /or low impact development techniques. The applicants originally intended the application to be a conservation development project. They are aware of the City's desire to encourage conservation design, and have been following the AUAR project. They also found the growth management incentives attractive. However, the exemptions from growth limits do not include the Stage 1 MUSA total, so a comp plan amendment would still be necessary. In addition, we need a great deal of information to classify a project as a conservation development in order to exempt it from the specified growth restrictions. Specific information would include such things as stormwater management designs, open space designs, long term stewardship plans for open space, etc. Such information typically would be included in a planned unit development /plat application. The current application for a comprehensive plan amendment does not include detailed information • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 10 that would support exempting a "conservation development" from specified growth management limits. Even so, we support the developer's efforts to incorporate as many environmentally friendly elements as possible as the development design proceeds. The open space, innovative stornuwater management methods and attention to the long term management of these design features demonstrate good planning by the developer and are consistent with the City's environmental planning goals. The site is within the AUAR area and all development there must observe the Conservation Development Framework. The means that conservation development elements will be mandatory in the PUD design. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN The developer's intent is to master plan the 363 acres for commercial and residential uses. The specifics are not finalized yet. As described in the zoning ordinance, the purpose of a PUD general concept plan is to provide an opportunity for the applicant to submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development. The concept plan provides an opportunity for the proposal to be publicly considered at an early stage. The name of the project will be re- examined. The town center area at the I -35W interchange is referred to as The Village. The I -35E development area should have a name that does not cause confusion. The following elements of the proposed general concept plan represent the immediately significant elements for review, as listed in the zoning ordinance. 1) Overall Maximum PUD Density Range. The application includes ranges of units and acreages. In Lino Lakes, density is calculated on the net area: simply by subtracting the wetlands from the gross site acreage. Some rough estimating, which includes open space and right of way data for the residential area only, leads to a residential density about 4.5 units per acre. 2) General Location of Major Streets and Pedestrian Ways. The concept plan includes the main collectors and access points envisioned in the draft AUAR (see attached Figure 21 -1 from AUAR).. A local north/south collector provides a route through the site. Two collector roads provide access to 20th Ave. on the west of the site. The north/south collector would continue south to access Main St., and north to future developments. The concept plan also shows an internal local circulation network providing access for the residential development areas. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 11 The AUAR recognizes the importance of managing access to major transportation infrastructure. Collector and arterial roads will not function well if new road intersections and driveways are allowed without an overall plan. The AUAR follows access management guidelines with'/ mile spacing between full intersections on 20th Ave. The development site does not abut Main St. The pictured collector road would need to extend 1/4 mile south of the site to access Main St. The Centerville /Lino Lakes border complicates the situation, as does the undetermined interchange design. The location of the access to Main St. is still under consideration. Main St. is challenging because of the I -35E interchange planning underway among Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Centerville, and MnDOT. The current front runner for the interchange design includes a typical diamond with one exception. In the northwest quadrant of the interchange, the southbound exit ramp forms a new intersection and continues onto a new local road south of Main St. (see attached figure). This new local road would run between the existing 2151 Ave. and I -35E. The new signalized intersection on Main St. would be only about 600 feet from 215` Ave. The latest plan is to convert the 21" Ave. intersection to limit turning movements and allow westbound Main St. traffic to flow freely from the exit ramp to 20th Ave. The 20th Ave. intersection will be signalized. All this means that the location of 21' Ave. north of Main St. is an important consideration. The road design does not need finalization as part of the comprehensive plan amendment approval. However, the road design must fulfill the traffic needs. A traffic study has resulted in a recommendation that running a new road from Main St. north to the Hardwood Creek development on the west side of the existing bank and would be an acceptable alternative. This road would provide access to the north. However, there are a number of considerations that will need to be addressed with site design: enough stacking distance and the level of service near the interchange, Anoka County's view of access in the area, including spacing of signalized intersections, access to properties within Centerville, and water and sanitary sewer trunk alignment to serve the project. The new road might end up being a right in/right out only, with primary access to the site from 20th Ave. It could also end up aligning with the existing 215t Ave. These questions will apply whether or not the comprehensive plan is amended and no matter how the site is developed. The point is that there are alternatives for creating accesses to the site. The details will have to be worked out at part of the PUD review. 3) General Location and Extent of Public and Common Open Space. The concept plan includes an extensive open space network. The open space is to include stormwater management features, parkland, and trails combined into a large greenway system. • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 12 Several branches of the county ditch system lay in tiles crossing the site. However, many drain tiles that are not part of the ditch system were placed on the site over the years to drain the land for agriculture. Much of the potential for incorporating conservation development elements into the development lies with the stormwater management design. Utilizing infiltration to the greatest extent possible will be important, as will accommodating the flow currently carried by the numerous drain tiles. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan includes trail connections to be created on the site. The concept plan includes these and more to facilitate walking and biking within the site and to connect to trails outside the site. The greenway system would utilize the pipeline easement as part of the trail network. 4) General Location of Residential and Non - Residential Land Uses with Approximate Type and Intensities of Development. Single family and multi - family residential areas are shown on the concept plan. Housing will cover approximately 150 to 170 acres. Commercial uses in the southeast portion of the site will comprise 55 to 70 acres. The following table is taken from the concept plan. Total 363 acres Commercial 500,000 to 600,000 sf 55 to 70 acres Residential Single family 400 to 420 units Multi - family 800 to 830 units 1200 to 1250 units 150 to 170 acres Open Space 80 to 95 acres Public Right of Way 55 acres 5) A Staging and Time Schedule of Development. The submittal includes a phasing plan. The site would develop from south to north, with over half the commercial development and some residential in phase one. Phase two would include the rest of the commercial area and a large amount of residential. Phases three and four would continue the residential development. The developer envisions full build out of the site over six years. 6) Other Special Criteria for Development. 110 The AUAR has not yet been completed. Much of the project design will depend on the AUAR, particularly the mitigation plan. • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 13 In addition, several roadway issues must be resolved. These include the design of the I -35E interchange and the final design for the intersection at 21St Ave. and Main St. Timing will be another important aspect of this development. Transportation infrastructure is needed to support a development of this size. In addition, improvements to the water and sanitary sewer infrastructure will be needed to support full build out of the project. The extent and timing of site development will rely heavily upon these issues. The City Engineer's memo is attached. What can be seen in the concept plan is an extensive open space /greenway network. This will provide for trail connections, stormwater treatment, buffering from the freeway, and the potential for wildlife habitat. Though we don't have design details, the developer is including many conservation development elements in the site design. We'll see more with the PUD application. We are encouraged and support the efforts so far. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board discussed the application on August 31. Because this is not an actual plat application with specifics, the Board's recommendation is general: "The Environmental Board supports the general environmental direction of the Village of Hardwood Creek, realizing that there is a lot more to be done." ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE The EDAC discussed the application on October 6th. EDAC unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to mixed use. EDAC also unanimously recommended that the City Council support the Planned Unit Development concept plan, utilizing the Conservation Development Framework outlined in the AUAR recommendations. Members' message to the City Council is that EDAC supports this development as an economic benefit to the city, but that the development should be held to Conservation Development standards. Public benefits such as pedestrian access between the commercial and residential development, trail access to areas outside the development, and appropriate recreational amenities for the residents living in the development are elements of the final plan that should be required as the development moves forward through the approvals process. • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 14 OPTIONS i. Resolution 05 -153, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Approve Resolution 05 -153 approving amendment of the comprehensive plan. 2. Deny Resolution 05 -153. ii. PUD concept plan Provide comment on the PUD concept plan. RECOMMENDATION i. Resolution 05 -153: Option 1 ii. PUD concept plan: Provide comment on the PUD concept plan. It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD review. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO AMEND THE PROPOSED LAND USE MAP, REQUEST 370 ACRES OF MUSA, AND AMEND TEXT WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has adopted a Comprehensive Plan to guide community growth in a rational and responsible manner through 2020; and WHEREAS, MN Statutes 462.355 authorizes the governing body to amend the comprehensive municipal plan; and WHEREAS, the City received and application for a comprehensive plan amendment for 363+ acres for a site located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20t'' Ave.); and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on September 14th and 27th, 2005 and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan: The Proposed Land Use Plan is amended to guide the area of approximately 370 acres to Mixed Use, as shown on the attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use Plan (Detail)" (Exhibit A). The amendment includes 370 acres of MUSA for the subject area. This MUSA is applied to the site, not included in the MUSA reserve. The resulting MUSA line is shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map (Exhibit A). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the text of the Comprehensive Plan is amended as shown in Exhibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the application for a comprehensive plan amendment fulfills the following criteria, which are listed both for exceeding the 147 annual units statement and the Mixed Use section: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan • • There are two specific goals that relate to this application in the Policy Plan section of the comprehensive plan: 1. Provide a healthy variety of housing types, styles and choices to meet the changing life cycle needs of the Lino Lakes Population. 3. Promote multiple family housing alternatives as an attractive life cycle housing option. The application will amend the plan to designate the site for multi - family as well as single family development. b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without the project The AUAR lays out a transportation framework to guide future planning. This includes a local roadway system within development areas to avoid relying entirely on CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 for traffic movement. The system framework provides access to areas within the application site as well as to land north of the site. This roadway system is vital to good transportation planning in the eastern part of Lino Lakes. Development in the area will construct these streets and by doing so build a major part of the needed transportation system as part of one project. Smaller developments would not be able to create the system. and the City will not be able to construct these streets. In addition, Anoka County has identified the need to improve CSAH 21 to handle projected traffic volumes. This project will provide resources to make significant improvements to CSAH 21 because improvements will be needed in order for this project to proceed. The utilities (water and sanitary sewer) that will be constructed with this project will include trunk lines planned to serve other property. Like the road system, this will provide a large piece of the utility systems needed in this part of the city. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the application for a comprehensive plan amendment complies the following performance standards, which are required for development in areas guided for Mixed Use: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. The concept plan includes residential areas across from existing residential and areas guided residential on the west side of CSAH 21 (20`h Ave.). The concept - 56 - Resolution No. 05 -153, page 2 • • • includes commercial development abutting land to the south guided for commercial use. Specifics will be reviewed with a development application. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The concept plan includes the collector roads and access points laid out in the AUAR. This layout is intended to observe access management guidelines and provide for safe, efficient movement. 3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available. Water and sanitary sewer is available to the site and will be extended to serve the site and land beyond. 4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods whenever feasible. The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the mitigation plan that the Conservation Development Framework is a fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR area. Every project can and must incorporate conservation development design and /or low impact development techniques. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. The concept plan includes a greenway system and interconnectivity. The details of the site design will be reviewed with a development application. 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. The details of the site design will be reviewed with a development application to ensure compliance with this standard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this amendment of the comprehensive plan is subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council, as required by MN Statute 473. - 57 - Resolution No. 05 -153, page 3 • • • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to an approval of a planned unit development, preliminary plat, or other development application that may follow. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor - 58 - Resolution No. 05 -153, page 4 • • • EXHIBIT A, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153 AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN •RURAL LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID:a LOW DENSITY.; r..: UNSEWERED- RESID: .. INDUSTRIAL LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID. COMMERCIAL • • • EXHIBIT B, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153 • The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land Use Plan chapter, on page 97: MIXED USE The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development, as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development project in a Mixed Use area could include only one type of land use, other and use designations are available for development with only one type of and use. Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review. Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than residential development, which raises stormwater management design challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed Use land use designation envisions varied land uses, and recognizes the possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These can best be addressed with extensive environmental review. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited to: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without the project c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without the project • d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without the project Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following performance standards: 1. The and use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. 3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available. 4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods whenever feasible. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. West Side of 1 -35E A 370 -acre development site is located % mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to 600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety of single family and multi - family residential development will include approximately 1200 to 1250 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be approximately 4.5 units per acre, when including all land not within the commercial area. While these are the approximate use parameters, the specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach. In the northeast corner of the site, a triangle is formed by 1 -35E, a pipeline, and the property boundary. This area could be designed to accommodate an office campus type use, which could be a suitable land use along the freeway. This would reduce the amount of residential land noted above and increase the commercial land. Such flexibility is appropriate to accommodate what will be determined as the best use of the triangle area. - 61 - Resolution No. 05 -153, Exhibit B, page 2 • • • This site is included in the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation plan that forms a part of the AUAR, which includes the Conservation Development Framework as the fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR area. This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan in 2005. This amendment was intended to fulfill the City's growth management policy requirement that amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year) would be exceeded. • The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District 6 section, on page 153: West Side of I -35E A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential uses. This site is described in the Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter. The specifics of the development are to be part of a piaster plan using a planned unit development approach. • The policy on page 27 of the comprehensive plan is amended to read as follows: 9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may include but is not limited to: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without exceeding the target c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the target d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without exceeding the target - 62 - Resolution No. 05 -153, Exhibit B, page 3 • • • Figure 1 Site Location • • Figure 2 LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RURAL LOW DENSITY SEWERED LOW DENSITY__.,:.:,; UNSEWEREII • ICE -SID:° LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID: COMMERCIAL • • Figure 3 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID: RURAL SID. 4. 13-x1,—°^ 1 LOW DENSITY -• UNSEWERED RESID: LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID. _- 47'7: y y Ti • • • Figure 4 ZONING MAP DETAIL Figure 5 AUAR Figure 21 -1: Existing and Proposed Transportation Network 141W TnisFludcillansyailantTonrAtittittia u�. SITE Figure 21 -1. Existing and Proposed Transportation Network • Figure 6 I- 35E at Anoka CSAH 14 interchange Concepts re jVillage of Hardwood Creek Site 1 -35! CSAH 14 Prep .red by SRF April 29, 2'X5 CONCEPT 2 Diamond plus northwest loop • • AGENDA ITEM 6.C.i STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson CC MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Second Reading of Ordinance 09 -05 PUD Amendment — Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide Permissible Uses Table BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has submitted plans for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. This application was continued by the Planning and Zoning Board at their September 14th regular meeting and is anticipated to be included on the October 12th Planning and Zoning Board meeting agenda. The previously adopted Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide did not include a hotel as one of the permissible uses within Chapter 3.1. Therefore staff has initiated this amendment of the Planned Unit Development to include hotel as a permissible use in within the Commercial district. A hotel would be a positive addition to the project as it would offer a diversity of uses and additional users for the businesses located within the project. A hotel is an appropriate mix with retail and office, and is considered a permissible use within the GB (General Business) zoning district by the zoning ordinance. GB (General Business) is the standard commercial zoning classification for the city and allows commercial uses similar to what would be allowed within the commercial district of the Legacy project. Staff feels that this omission was not meant to prohibit the use within the Commercial district, but rather was just an oversight at the time. In fact the guidelines contain a parking standard for a hotel use, which would indicate that it was anticipated within the development. Staff has had discussions regarding hotels in the Legacy project as far back as when Calthorpe was still involved in the project. Staff has even had discussions with the City Council at work sessions where the use was proposed and met no specific objections at the time. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 09 -05 amending the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide to add Hotel as a permissible use within the Commercial District. 2. Return to staff with direction RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 09 -05 - 69 - • CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 09-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE (LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER) AS CREATED BY ORIDINANCE 04 -04. The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION 1. FINDINGS The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for amending the Planned Unit Development for the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. l E of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for mixed uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for mixed uses. Land in the area of the site is already developed with mixed uses or designated for such use. 3. The Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide contains specific performance standards that will apply to any Hotel use that is proposed within the Planned Unit Development area. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Public improvements are underway that will service the entire Planned Unit Development area adequately. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property in conjunction with the public improvements proposed. • The Planned Unit Development for the Legacy at Woods Edge (Lino Lakes Town Center) as approved by Ordinance 04 -04 is hereby amended as follows: • SECTION 2. DISTRICT PROVISIONS A. Table 1 of Section 3.1 (Allowable Uses) of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, attached to Ordinance 04 -04 as Exhibit B, shall be amended to include Hotel as a permissible use within Commercial Districts. This will appear in the text as follows: Allowable Land Use Comm ercial Mixed Use Civic Commercial Uses Hotel. P SECTION 3. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. SECTION 4. • This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October, 2005 ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • AGENDA ITEM 6.C.ii STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plat - Village No. 4 Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND Hartford Development, Inc. has submitted the final plat for Village No. 4, which encompasses Outlots A, and E of Village No. 3. The submitted plat depicts 7 lots and three outlots. Block 1 will consist of four lots. Lot 1 is intended for the apartment/retail building, and Lot 4 is intended for the hotel (both buildings are a part of this agenda). Lot 2 and 3 (and Outlot A) are intended for future buildings. Block 2 will consist of three lots. Lot 1 is intended for the shared parking area, Lot 2 is intended for Betty's Pies, and lot 3 is intended for a future user. Two outlots are included that will also be for future uses. The title commitment for the property and final plat were forwarded to the City Attorney for review and are acceptable. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this project at the October 12, 2005 regular meeting, recommending approval subject to the conditions included in this staff report. OPTIONS. 1. Adopt Resolution 05 -160, approving the final plat for The Village No.4 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION The final plat significantly conforms to the Land Use and Regulating Plans of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, therefore staff is recommending approval. ATTACHMENTS - 7 2 - 1 Final Pint • • • Village No. 4 Final Plat Page 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -160 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR VILLAGE NO. 4 WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a final plat, and WHEREAS, review and approvals of plats are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Village No. 4 was approved with Resolution 04 -33 by the City Council on March 14, 2005 with conditions, and WHEREAS, the final plat for Village No. 4 complies with City requirements and the conditions of Resolution 04 -33 have been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the final plat for Village No. 4. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October, 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor and 4e hereby dedicate le the peblk ler pub. 5 Li! \ 6S \ t r 09 o^ \ 6 _ 1 9 /6 \ 6 . t. F i E Y £I 1 $a Yx n • Q �5'.T ao< F�9 � 1_ 4 ° ° t x O • Q1- °s Z $o s` °n 4€ ae.a sp S 7 . ;. / I / I k• n / 1 < 1 1 09 hne I i 1 m4S I c \ 1\t ey1�y�d� 1-E 17 B y 'kcdeVCUx I t •t.Nnx /3 M - `. fD•rtrbx;i• \ 111.117.11 gill; /y x 11:11.71,;;;;;I F° f.py, p1 e i:1 " :: -f° °. t;C'_5 N p_0.q°g, I ? C7 F !• •N o I.. 7� d', ® Ic a- a oo, 2 d) 2 2m j tit -2 m BY B.LS./44125 (UNLESS at t•, I it a' 1 1 E 1113 , 11 121 \ \I 1 :e 11 � 11 II 1i I I S: \rud\ CAD \03proj \0317OPP \03170- N0-4.dwg 9/1/2005 123 Nd 12 /+. / / ) 0 0 %rJa ',6. �w / rBZ�J63'0'; • �.. • S4 o � � 639.32,11/./..k4.4,. 3 ;\ I i o s 1\ \; i�; 11' II 1 °y_ 11 \\�� \\\�\ \ i 1= I \ „1 Imo i-2 I ,∎ . ■ °o I ,, \$;I °1 -,,1 1`4g 8 I \ mil k .. 501'44'42'E \ cP 57 70.50 dodo W 2 �O 500•08I3'E S0570.50 70.50 I \ \ A °6 I\t-'01/ , T ' ''' ?'; • / \ ■ ■ ■ 1 • I I 00 o s� ,o 0> y0 fl ° p C 3 0 . m j A 0z VI T10 0" O. 2 I�+ O 0,>. ^a n =- 01-1 oa do ���°^ Zo z ma� �m u; O 2) - O QnN NQ�a ra8 z • f'1 0 o f o- p m 2 � 3 r.. _..c L In m; ;� °. — 5. p UI Z N^ ] ] O m ~ 5 nmm 77n 7) �m 0. o S, 00 -0 mo CD n) H Nsm mP1 m In c T -,1-: ^ a r !^ 30 0, Ca A 6 ad �M n m —, m N =� m,°3- 2Om U = n £ 0 m c s0] uz ra z m N n 8 8 =• / /r ; r : // ,• •// � r�/ • c 54 / . / / '7s 2. C/ p 270 ;R : 8Ow 6 ' htd �l $`g.os50.0 1 Cr�3$ 2856.1 0. f*IN 00 0 rn -, __a 8.750 500'28'15'E H•J'STpB•3a__ *� t- 1� 1 .4Jg3 o.1; ..a \y~ �o i 1 N j6 UO2o.93 \ \ 1 7 L arivos DIHdd2IO This plat has been checked and approved this 03 a a m 00 0 t3) • \ 99 \ 60 / J l siy; our sio ;aq pa6palnMouoloo 0 0 o 0 00 3 c ui u n' ;PuDJ8 u4or 011 - 11- SONIa1OH AOVO31 Outlot A and Outlot E. THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka 5 • AGENDA ITEM 6.C.iii STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit Final Plan Betty's Pies Legacy at Woods Edge • • BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single tenant restaurant within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the restaurant building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). Betty's Pies is a full service restaurant that meets the intent of the city's vision for a family oriented, neighborhood gathering place in the new mixed use downtown. Owners Marti Sieber and Carl Ehlenz run the Two Harbors, Minnesota, destination restaurant and this will be their first expansion into the metro area. The overall area of the building will be 7,935 square feet. The majority of the building itself is single story, with the exception of an office area which is located over the center section of the building. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at the September 14th regular meeting, and offered up comments to both staff and the developer about the proposal. Numerous revisions have been made to the plans and are addressed throughout this report. ANALYSIS Gover'nim: Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The layout generally follows the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout, with the exception of the combination of lots 3, 4, and 5 to create two lots. The main entry of the building will be from the parking lot, which is atypical for this type of urban development. However, the plaza that is being proposed in combination with the outdoor dining area and the walkway from the street into the site has been determined to sufficiently act as an Betty's Pies, page 2 •'entpoint' for both this restaurant and the building that will be built on the adjacent lot to the east. The ry applicant has been informed by staff that the continuation of the plaza as shown on these plans will need to occur on the adjacent lot, and that the location of the main entrance away from the street right -of -way will not be something that is allowed in other locations within the development. The proposed Betty's Pies building is located in a Commercial Land Use Area and takes up both lot 3 and part of lot 4 in Block A (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). Acceptable Building Type is Commercial with a minimum number of floors for all uses of one and a maximum of 3. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The Regulating Plan does not indicate any `Required Building Entries' on this site, nor any `Gateways'. Allowable Uses The proposed use for this site is a family -style restaurant. The Lino Lakes Town Center Development & Design Guide classifies this use as `Eating Places / Restaurants / Private Clubs and Lodges' and considers it a permissible use within the Commercial District. The applicable section is included below: SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Com Allowable Land Use Comm ercial Mixed Use Civic Commercial Uses Eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges: • With outdoor seating areas [4] [6] • With drive - through or drive -up facilities [5] • With entertainment, bar or cocktail lounge at least 50 feet from the Residential District. [2] P C C A P C - A - - - - TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use. C = conditional use. (See Appendix A for Conditions of Use) A = accessory to permitted or conditional use [2] Establishments that serve alcohol, and/ or feature amplified music are conditionally permitted as an accessory use to restaurants subject to City Code requirements if they are at least 50 feet from the Residential District [4] Outdoor seating may occur between buildings and within allowable building setbacks (see Table 3). Outdoor seating may also occur on sidewalks within street rights -of -way, provided that there is a clear passage for pedestrian movement that is at least 6 feet in width. [5] Refer to the diagram on page 20 for guidance on siting drive - throughs. [6] The City may set limits on hours of operation to avoid nuisance issues. The applicant is also proposing to have outdoor seating areas as a part of their business. Restaurants with outdoor seating areas are listed as a Conditional Use within the Commercial District. Conditions for the proposed use are in Appendix A of the Design and Development Guide, and include the following: • A. Eating Places /Outdoor Restaurants, Clubs and Lodges: • • Betty's Pies, page 3 1. Accessory outdoor seating areas: a. The applicant shall submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. b. Access to the dining area shall be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. d. All lighting shall be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4. F of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant shall demonstrate that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least six (6) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. f. The dining area shall be surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface. g. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. h. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. i. Refuse containers shall be provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. Staff has reviewed the application for the Conditional Use Permit in regards to the conditions above and the proposed use can clearly meet all of the conditions as is proposed. Attached to the report is an exhibit depicting the outdoor dining area layout. Building Massing & Placement The proposed building is within a portion of the development that requires build -to lines, specifically for this site a maximum 5 foot setback is prescribed and is being substantially met with this proposal. The only section of the building that does not specifically meet the 5 foot maximum setback is the portion of the site designated • for outdoor dining and plaza. This meets the standards of the build to line which require a minimum of 70% of the block to meet the build -to lines, and up to 20% can be plaza /park areas. Betty's Pies, page 4 °Along the build -to line the building is also required to have a minimum height of 20 feet. The proposed elevations depict the parapet walls (the lowest point) at a height of 20 feet, with additional height being supplied to the structure thanks to the retaining wall on the street side of the site. The height of the building never exceeds 40 feet, even when measured from the base of the retaining wall to the very peak of the highest roof. Architectural Standards The relationship between the building and the street is required to be accentuated by expressive wall faces, with a minimum of 60% of the wall face being windows, doors, or arcades. The proposed elevations meet or exceed all of those requirements. Due to the grade differences of the site and the adjacent sidewalk, as well as the location of parking for the property, the primary building entry is being placed on the parking lot side of the building. While this does not specifically meet the standards of the guidelines, the location of the outdoor dining as well as the design of the connecting walkway /plaza creates an entry feature not only for this building, but also for the adjacent building and the entire interior of the block. The tower elements proposed for the building clearly accentuate the two main public entrances for the restaurant. •Due to the grade differences between the site and the pedestrian streetscape, the scale of the building is slightly exaggerated; however the revised plans address this separation between the streetscape and the building with building fenestrations; the integration of the retaining wall into the structure itself; and the outdoor dining area/plaza entry feature. • The base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of a stone veneer applied at a variety of heights ranging from 1 foot to almost 16 feet when integrated into the retaining wall portion on the southwest corner of the building. The top is also clearly articulated with the use of bracketing below all areas proposed with roofs above; with the parapet element that mimics the accentuation of the cementitious wall board banding below the roof lines (Though this parapet element is slightly understated in mass it is appropriately integrated into the overall scale of the building); and with the stepping effect that is created by the use of both standard angled roofing as well as parapet walls above flat roofing. The parapet walls will also provide an adequate screening device for the roof mounted equipment that will be required for this type of use. The building materials proposed for the site include stone and brick veneers; cementitious wall board or E.I.F.S., and a prefabricated metal roofing material. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided, and is accentuated by the clerestory windows that surround the main dining area. Patrons of the establishment will also be offered shelter from the elements in the entry vestibules while waiting to be seated and the provision of shade umbrellas within the outdoor dining area. Betty's Pies, page 5 e building integrates all of the necessary service areas into the building including the trash handling area, which is accessed through a roll up door on the north side of the northeast corner of the building. Parking Requirements Single Use Peak Hour y Demand Net Floor Area (90% of G.F.A.) Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus 8 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 7,142 s.f. 64 93 29 Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of a restaurant the peak periods are identified as 8 PM on both weekdays and weekends. Betty's Pies Single Use Peak Hour Demand 8 spaces per 1,000 s.f. Parking Peak (8 PM Weekdays and Weekends) 57 Parking Provided 93 Surplus 36 The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. 0 Entire Block • Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (1 PM Weekdays) Parking Provided Surplus Varies 402 405 The shared parking spreadsheet has been adjusted to match the proposed building layout for this entire block, specifically the buildings for lots 3, 4, and 5 have been adjusted to reflect only two users. The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is required by the Development and Design Guidelines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for bicycle parking facilities on this block. Landscaping Requirements The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6, including the number of Parking Lot Trees, the height of retaining walls, and the design of the connecting walkway between the main entrance and the street right -of -way. As previously mentioned in the Parking section of the report, the site plan indicates a total of 93 parking spaces. This means that the 12 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot does not abut any public streets, so no additional landscaping buffer is required in that regard. The overall plan for this block will include roughly 288 parking spaces, which does not meet or exceed the threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the parking lot. Betty's Pies, page 6 • The plaza entry provided from the Town Center Parkway streetscape adequately functions as a `connecting walkway' to the main entry of the building. This connecting walkway exceeds the six foot width requirement; is to be constructed out of decorative pavement; and will be planted with shade trees spaced 25 feet on center. The lighting will be built directly into the steps leading from the streetscape to the plaza, and with a decorative light fixture matching the city's fixtures for the streetscape. All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the continents of the Environmental Board as well as city staff. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned to be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting that will be used for this phase of development must be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods Edge project area. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Additionally, as was discussed in the landscape section of the report, a decorative lighting fixture is indicated within the plaza entry area on the southeast corner of the site. • Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this project at the October 12, 2005 regular meeting, recommending approval subject to the conditions included in this staff report. • Betty's Pies, page 7 • s OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 05 -163 approving the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies. 2. Deny Resolution 05 -163 for the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site perfolivance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The `gull wing' fixture (type EE and EE1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area on this block, if not the rest of the project site. 5. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 6. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. ATTACHMENTS 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Betty's Pies plan set received September 27, 2005. 4. Betty's Pies outdoor dining area — site plan received October 5, 2005. • Betty's Pies, page 8 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05-163 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR DINING, AND THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR BETTY'S PIES WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: ;and Outlot E, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the City has approved a final plat entitled THE VILLAGE NO. 4, which will create the parcel on which the Betty's Pies is proposed to be constructed. This parcel will be described as: Lot 2, Block 2, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ;and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Betty's Pies Plan Set received September 27, 2005. 2. Betty's Pies Outdoor Dining Plan received October 5, 2005. 3. Village No. 4 Final Plat received September 7, 2005 ; and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 12, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting_ minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide, subject to certain conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan for the Betty's Pies subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. II/ 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stonnwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building penrnits. • Betty's Pies, page 9 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 6. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit for an accessory outdoor seating area in the commercial district of the Lino Lakes Town Center, subject to the following conditions: 1. Accessory outdoor seating areas: a. The applicant shall submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. b. Access to the dining area shall be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. d. All lighting shall be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4. F of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant shall demonstrate that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least six (6) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. • Betty's Pies, page 10 f. The dining area shall be surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface. g. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. h. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. ii. Refuse containers shall be provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. John J. Bergeson, Mayor • ATTEST: Jean Viper, Deputy City Clerk • SEH H October 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Betty's Pies Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.09 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Betty's Pies site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. It appears that a large portion of the sidewalk on the north side of the building has cross slopes exceeding 2.0 %. These slopes exceed the maximum cross slope of 2% as .set forth. in_.ADA Accessibility Guidelines. Utility Plan (Sheet C4.0) 1. The rim on STMH 101 appears low. Verify this rim elevation is correct. 2. No information is shown for the grading of the ECS Drainage System. This information must be shown on the plans. 3. The cover over the 12" HDPE pipe from STMH 101 to the ECS Drainage System is inadequate along some of its length near the outlet. As shown, less than one foot of cover will be provided over the top of the pipe. The full pavement section of 4" of bituminous and 8" of class 5 aggregate must be maintained over the pipe. Insulation or the pipe itself should not impact the pavement section. 4. Roof drains are shown on the plan with a note indicating roof storage is to be used for rate control and reference the architectural plans. The architectural plans show the roof drains but do not indicate how rate control will be maintained, and refer to the mechanical drawings which were not provided. The usage of roof storage to hold runoff from a 2.5" stonn event was one component of the hydrology model submitted to and approved by Rice Creek Watershed District and is an integral part of the hydrologic design submitted by Hartford in this submittal. Without roof storage, the central pond /infiltration basin, as currently shown, will be undersized. Roof storage and rate control for a 2.5" storm event must be utilized on this building consistent with the hydrology model originally approved by Rice Creek Watershed District. Information describing how this will be done must be submitted for review. 5. The locations and elevations of the sanitary and water main stubs on the west side of the building have been revised as a part of the construction of Town Center Parkway. SEH will provide these locations and elevations so the plans can be revised. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite 5, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 I 715.234.4069 fax • • • Mr. Michael Grochala October 6, 2005 Page 2 6. If the future buildings north of Betty's Pies, around the central parking lot, are planned to be served by the internal water main loop, a 8" cross and gate valve should be provided. in place of the 8" tee north of Betty's Pies so that a complete loop can be made around the central parking lot. As currently shown, a loop will only run from Town Center Parkway to Village Drive through the southern side of the central parking lot. Please call me at 651.76 .2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer x:`J:o \lincI:030509`•plan rcaic v bcttyspics100605 - cngincering.doc • • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Lecsacv at Woods Edge Bettys Pies: Plant Schedule: Deciduous Trees list has two species that should be reconsidered for change. Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. The Autumn Flame clump Maple is also a woodland invader and is getting established in some of our native woodlands. Amelanchier or Service berry, Ironwood, any of the disease resistant, fruit persistent flowering crabs, might be substituted for this species. Erosion Control: The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. A a F 5 gg Is +8 e a A u T 9 a tEi Ail bSb Egg N II pi a MM Al MI A 5 Y 5 1 z 0 OQ n w z (I)® -z 0 m r 5 9 1� PP S 11� 1 El All RM Aa 00 R RgRO g s a s T gsssmo a AA Tgss CD z 7 86 n 'E E T s g € €€ 2 € 1' Pin 4 F s0 i1 i g 8 1 61151111A1 IA tnigli PR 1 _ £A 1 g off/ ag rIg b €A 3 A t (xi z rr: rrw. mzE ce) ►� .4g c)c)1,-H cm--41 cr) cir) 0 rrl flgE.to °m amRorSm ru ,,}p a rt., 0 _ ;PPEE O. E»an.2o N!!,tbE,N ..�ti- gR,i'L'r^.,EM,1 2922 M 4 IIMI P OP011 OW R € G i 1 eg wpp €oIpJ1 o EAU ii G Om M A 0 n 8 X3QNI 133HS •I ■� OM cmcmm VAM 40d M b 5 PAM 0 M m oPx 04 2E4 XAV Egp gil =�mN FQ; F�4 M7 C' Ni is Lj j1L 1L 1L .! I N.) L71 F m�4 ov MO Ng 2, gi 1g No og Mg cc € >� o 1�NA P 9 yam WNW 2 NWei P205 1 4?�• ,ts" z gigIn Vld 1N31A13021Y1NE 31IS ■■■i ■■■/ I ■f �' 1 G i■ Qi■Z�� 1 1 ■ ■C :■ iQ► ■► Q : ► : QQ:QQ:dQQ:QC3 2: ■%i� d: CQ: = • QQ: ■I . i A F i II II / / / • l4� \ISl qG \\c•04 • z -1 Zn • _0 zz • (idli �rOF \OovSI �qiC) —Z —05.■• 0 m z 8' g = GS ° IX 8 IN MO iA 12 11 11 i2 2R 1g 11 0 10 @@ 3 > o !!!!!!!!!!! =�F ° e p� :mgg19 0 p p� t� !!! 64 n € z gli�PW0infi ° q n � M 9q - ci Oa UI E5A IT 141 ;g Ng X N= 1€ it m w gig- la Z v z y 0 O2 r 8 e a s$ 0 ? f7 5 TY 03( e | , | � • `g > r J | || ; r �n ( 7 \ | , �� ( . | , 0 O LANDSCAPE PLAN D 2 TT ijIv r ZE * al � ....MO un °z 11100 9Mill!!YM !OEM PIWPSE,MN SUIT[]N PM: xlawum OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC o I 11111 ° �� E `cif ` i 1.,:� * VVV"����'"' 0 � _) g r.i :rj' r r ,1 !" i IT n ... t i 1�'bv g01 SRS m o 1 r.g Rogl 011 .-. �3 �� 6 boy �c'a T. ri ° tt y v '� °F����i,go q oil7f. 2� l D N - ,-1°K °.gm{ r q4 °vo0Ro$ n =a 8 i "s �m���7�1a III i I I Al 'S, "' ; v.o� v y = 1p� osApA 3 aii Bin +l '011 yi Thin gm m ay1 o"e' yyTT,, PL °I B • • ;i1ij,1:Th ii1 kW �� m P g gN poq R ` !' zo-, g �§ ciS = �`F g XK 3 , I LAS{? �., y + - � 9 zQ� °� of e B m � 0,1 . ^m"�i B a Q5U n i r EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY Aft rnr A9" o ° m 2 f D A Ill _ r TN -z NI ,s Vz 4� tt �i�ti a� T P. i u $ 1Eo i 2 99 ``N w z U o v t7 �r D> ) °' _ N ° z 4 0 0 m 1t =.I11 - = I o n v •\ 1 -� °S2S..a . N . Mo A °D " V ^ m m °z F c aJ 1 it rfr"�i= o °1rn.� Lap ppC� p1 g8 -� $ m �N ° 4 \`i= �/_ r t a ( .. • Thr' -� !FJ I��'\ � m ;I!r �S Q, 1� u� ;EIIPU gg ; _5 < �f'- im -1 n_ne._ m= n °caz x. E2 G1 a N 8 b :tg A ij =� 8 Bm _'� gm $ N , a 74. m 4g .E r5 41 J \ > °S! v� 8 P 9 tl! Irt ov Shim D r>, 6 i� �� m R r ■ -1 - I Oi? � ...... I .i = 4o y �r wcrei r g ° yxi �i .•µµ ;IN f 01 J� Z -i NY it i " q =,I gt AiZ1 S y �II N D di = :�:: ■::::: 111111•1111■11t ■111 I II II, I I III I I:j III I l III IL: ry i I IL� IIII; IIi I I I.. � � II EI 11.:= 11 yk WS 1 ° gggggg F� �I _r+�`,y. ��1$tii� { `` I o i{ .;�$ Q J .\i - '� \ogF \� 1 iA€ Egg mil S g g E� X� vv� m ~ E ' ME $v �'^ �Fmy 1m g �g na5r x P02 pp ill; II-jyC� 5I ,, fell! C A r^ ,iir�a•JT $ Ebh �^ P m§ F° �� ;Be m g m �i^ L m'''. o $ °i ii 2; ; 5A d$ �q god FAmU�' g iT � s22o P L 4 �i 2 §gq Pi d$ 8 A °S mF g � m P,. m -g Q m ° R 8Fr �t F.5 ooV < ,y. aS 2T• 11- --- ti '12:1. c I ' oh 1 : c i C g OAR ° mz B �� fN > po o p@N 2 s V" 91`XF mg 4 9' ��E 8 FE q o"m o f 22oa V> M20 11 2�a A $� s R q o� f yy91 m Fi o � i O y �� a 0 m N c m v /X! \ \ I r IX -' ` 'i ^ � ° w u I -InI_I I -u u � 4Vi rl al„Lk y� D u��- 8 D °c 4 gk `r} y // / : �i� 8.D ilFI 410111111 c D m �p g2 ° Cad 4 1" CB z ® -.I oW I) 0 pl Z o -1 ® Z 1 an JIl Ji$ ` { vZ 5 'd "ofi s� X z il v 8 $ 1,F ° =58 1 8AP m $$ R to R Tom ° 0' $ 9 Y p 2f \ l r lll= I q-... � =g i' ;. ° sp B g g A E iF i{,^ €"b 8 <' A g g es BB N eel �m P $ �B A z S ,n 8 -911 8� °p° 8 f^ ^ §F�F^� ! I mL� 11 VA n0$ ' VB< I �Nm _ � 9 B F° �� i I5' J�^ b Mz 8 8904 — .4 s 1 COQg-Im� 1, W. $ l6 'g era § x gx Pmro9 i4_8 o § mQ bbd °Trop M" ° �B ^� AO T COQ a Q 2 Fr o x ° o o, I SITE DETAILS I m D t 4 s 9 1n' r.. ig �°g Q° U LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LIE ^p I [NI d OKI a1 1611 JEI p),I A Q IT n AS Ln As ✓ g � 0 F 4 g W 5 gglt 5 9 II! 6 8 108 18m �J Oe 5 8 8 R1' IOW I 4 IF it Or _ as Ail 2" mg II —I_� -III c_- *g g g PIS "fig >4"t l II �) °� l+� ,g ig G ITIII e 1-2' Gf ;e! gx xx AI ig A 41 9 c �" . sg :fi 88 Op2 CA 8 8 b 36" MAX o� G z r la. FA o o • 71 r 91 • 71 Q f zS '2 11 4 -N-10 0 al 1 c.� n 0 z 1 :4; :k 1GG1 RV I s -€ V 4 ri:c:iTrPts zu a A • A€ 41 € • 0 8�. A •L' r7 .4 8€ I r / —1- . 1111-8 a1 ®3 g9 I 8 III��S I �1-11� F s5 a 1.!, I I II II' 1 I I I I I- F 1 111.1 <II 11 -11 —I ) _ —I I I -11..-=-1 I — • > 1 -, / � 111_ �111 I_a 11 -1 1- III =I I I • � II . 16 EllF 111 =111 LIFAII- • 11 111 II1�111 X111 111 11111111111.1111111101111MINIEUNINI al II IIIIri111.I•M•1iIHII.. Y�G 111 ° 1/ 111 IiIiiiIi1iidi.iiI'I OPP NOILO3S BY 2 Mgi -2g 2 r-a- IMAM 3,s /W Ela iRo All a; Z8 \ 1 1. X 1' SUPPORTS. RP. • DECORAME PANEL AND ART WORK MADE OF 1 /4-1/Y STEEL RAIL ELEVATION ORNAMENTAL RAILING 0 DETAIL � N sry�f Wf• QN 01: 2- djg 4! B4 § 4E. sg os P.T /P 4aa e 8q41 §-g 800 ow VF P NO IA 051g4 Fi ; G . X4 1 > 1 m ”Ag' 9 s At 3; moo TR �: • TP g' 8 $ 8M 9'VM9 - a G g: 21 PAIMOV 140 4swl LA O N "' fl n 8 8 5 G r j z� °rnm$° 91 to 0 1 `¢i 'Id 6 1 tg zN o 9_ 2 4 9 9� it J 9' r.p x• o' w.n..Mlenn 2 6 o 0z r r X fll —f io 0 pa 9 4 c m W R a 9 e mom mom WWII WU II F 111! I 1 • I all( 1-42,111 iIi�/tl I�� t A i1L 4 g 8A 25? FP gi 1 R. MN wit "Wl ■ b Sig [9 1§ 9 (D 2 REMOVABLE WASTE CONTAINER AND CIGARETTE DISPOSE CONTAINER ORNAMENTAL FENCE WITH 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN GATE. EXIT ONLY SIGN PAVEMENT TYPE II: 12 "X12" PAVER STACK PATTERN LIGHT SAND NATURAL BLEND COLOR AND TEXTURE NOTES: 1. TABLE SIZES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY OWNER. 2. ALL EXTERIOR FURNITURE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE OUTDOOR DINING AREA DURING RESTRICTED DATES AND STORED BY THE OWNER IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE CITY. PAVEMENT BAND: 4 "X8" (1) COLUMN SOLDIER COURSE DARK GRAY ORNAMENTAL BAND EXTERIOR LIGHTING SEE CITY SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS OUTDOOR DINING AREA APPROX. 58 SEATS 6 SEAT SQUARE TABLE WITH 36" ACCESSIBLE PERIMETER PAVEMENT TYPE III: 4 "X8" PAVER HERRINGBONE PATTERN 45' .10 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC RED /BLACK BLEND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY 2' WIDE SERPENTINE SHAPED CONCRETE SEATING WALL. APPROXIMATELY 24" HIGH rMo- L_ST O K'A;T7 N #T 11 rEMPpRgRY J WAIT RACE FpR STA TIONS 1rMO�FAeI L _STATIO 741r • RETAINING WALL AND ORNAMENTAL FENCE- APPROXIMATE GRADE DIFFERENE IS 4.5' 4 SEAT ROUND TABLE WITH 36" ACCESSIBLE PERIMETER CONCRETE STAIR WITH ORNAMENTAL RAILING AND LIGHTING 1/8" = 1.- 0" I ME 4 2 0 4 8 © COPYRIGHT 2005 HARTFORD GROUP A/E, INC. HARTFORD GROUP A/E INC. Architecture - Engineering - Planning 12100 Singletree Lane, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Ph: (952)746 -1200 - Fax: (952)746 -1201 Project Title: OUTDOOR DINING AREA - SITE PLAN BETTY'S PIES RECEIVED LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES, MN. OCT 0 5 2005 Cf Y Or LINO LAKES Project No.: RTL01 10 -4 -05 Page No: 1/1 • AGENDA ITEM 6.C.iv STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan — Lakewood Apartments Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development fugal plan for an apartment building with first floor multi- tenant retail within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the apartment building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). One of the goals of the mixed use downtown is to provide a variety of housing types and costs to meet life cycle housing needs that are not currently available in Lino Lakes. The development agreement between the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Hartford Group, the developer of the workforce housing, includes housing covenants. Those housing covenants include an affordability clause that requires that 20 00fpercent of the housing units built on the development property as a whole must meet affordability requirements. that 20 percent, 67 percent must be rental units that meet the income and rent requirements for fed income tax credits. This 60 -unit workforce rental housing meets the 67 percent requirement. eral low - In addition, affordable rental housing must meet the following requirements: 1. The developer must retain an experienced, professional property manager, approved in writing by the EDA. 2. The management agreement must require that the manager will use resident selection criteria that include evidence that tenants have income to support their rental rate, rental history showing timely payment of rent, and criminal background checks. 3. The management agreement must include a plan for long -term maintenance and repair of the property. Y ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The layout generally follows the original layout, though the lots have been slightly modified to accommodate the proposed apartment building. The layout of the entire block is shown on the site plan. The site has been reorganized to allow a commercial /office building to the west of the apartment building and one to the north • Lakewood Apartment, page 2 along the Interstate 35W frontage. It is a reduction in the overall building area that will be built in the area and is therefore substantially conforming to the original layout. • Lakewood Apartments is located in a Mixed Use Land Use area and is located on Lot 10 and 11 in Block B. Acceptable Building Types are Commercial /Retail /Office /Housing. The proposed apartment building will include underground parking, first floor retail and apartments, and three additional floors of apartments for a total of 60 units within the four story structure. The use of ground floor as residential (apartments) is not fully in conformance with the guidelines; however, since the portion of the building where this is being done is along a residential street across from future townhoines, staff finds it acceptable to permit a small number of units on the mixed -use streetside. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The Regulating Plan does not indicate any `Required Building Entries' on this site, nor any `Gateways'. The site is identified for an `Architectural Feature' at the southeast corner near the traffic roundabout. This will be discussed in more detail within the Architectural Standards section of the report. Allowable Uses The proposed use for this site is residential apartment units above first floor retail. The Lino Lakes Town •Center Development & Design Guide classifies these uses as General Merchandise Retail and Residential Units above Ground Floor Commercial; and considers them e applicable section is included below: p rmissible uses within the Mixed Use District. The SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Commercial, Commercial /Residential and Civic Districts Comm ercial Allowable Land Use Commercial Uses General merchandise retail, including but not limited to: variety, hardware, and dry goods stores, but excluding vending machine operators and direct selling organizations. Must be less than 40,000 s.f. footprint. Residential Uses Residential units above ground -floor commercial space (e.g. retail or employment), including "live work units." TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use • Mixed Use P Civic Lakewood Apartment, page 3 building Massing & Placement • The proposed building is within a portion of the development that requires build -to lines; specifically for this site a maximum 5 foot setback is prescribed. This standard requires a minimum of 70% of the block to meet the build -to lines, with up to 20% can be plaza/park areas. Though the build -to line is not technically being met, the developer has followed the spirit and intent of the guidelines to the best of their abilities and has delivered what staff feels is the best possible compromise on this site. The central element of the proposed building is shown right at the 5 foot setback line, and then the building tapers out as it proceeds both to the west and the b north. The west wing of the building must be stepped back due to the grade differences between the site and the streetscape, as well as the provision of underground arking. situation by p P � The developer has effectively mitigated this roviding a plaza that runs the entire length of the west wing of the building which provides a separate walkway to access the buildings with periodic stairways and landscaped planters to break monotony of the sidewalk area. On the north wing of the building the step back is necessary because of the residential use along the first floor. Within residential districts buildings are allowed a 15 foot setback meetin g build -to lines. Since the apartments are a residential use, and the residential project across the street will be allowed to be setback to the 15 feet, staff supports this minor deviation as an effort to create continuity the streetscape. The developer has included a `pocket park' that will be accessible to the occupants of the residential units within the entire building. The proposed building will be built at an overall height ranging from 49 to 51 feet, including the differential between the streetscape and the site. This exceeds the maximum height of 45 feet; however the additional height is in the form of parapet walls which are allowed to exceed the 45 foot height standard 10 additional feet. u p to • ?architectural Standards The relationship between the building and the street is required to be accentuated by expressive wall faces, with a minimum of 60% of the wall face being windows, doors, or arcades. The proposed elevations meet or exceed all of those requirements. The streetscape relationship is also accentuated by the use of landscaping planters within the plaza area attached to the west wing of the building. This will act as a clear separation between those using the public streetscape for transportation purposes versus those using the private sidewalk to gain access to the buildin p g itself. The primary entrances for all of the commercial uses, and secondary entrances for the residential uses will be provided along the front of the building. Secondary access for the commercial and the primary access for the residential portion of the building will be located on the rear of the building adjacent to the arki p ng area. As previously mentioned above, the Regulating Plan identifies an architectural feature at the southeast corne r of this site near the roundabout. The standards do not specifically define what format an architectural feature is supposed to take, but it does identify clock towers, bell towers, cupolas, trellises, and ornamental portions of parapet walls as architectural features in other portions of the text. The purpose of the architectural this location is to attract the eye of pedestrians and create a point of visual interest. The central portion tofe at e apartment building attempts to accomplish this by being stepped closer to the streetscape and with its height e differentiation from the surrounding portions of the building. Staff is g a developer to further accentuate the corner with some additional architecturalrelement. dition requiring the • Lakewood Apartment, page 4 .The base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of masonry materials throughout. The base also helps to define the separation between the uses, as the entire masonry materials, while only the first five feet of he residential commercial portion of he building building s finished is with hosed of masonry materials. The top is also clearly articulated with the use of strong cornice feature that the majority of the building. This cornice is especially accentuated by the contrasting color depicted. Due to the vast horizontal length of this building the architect has used a variety of fenestrations and stepped portions of the building to break up the elevation effectively. This stepping both on the wall face as well as the parapet walls requires that the cornice element also vary. Portions of the building have varied the location of the cornice, or even eliminated the cornice all together to provide a greater differentiation between the sections of the building. The parapet walls will provide an adequate screening device for the roof mounted equipment that will be required for this type of use. The building materials proposed for the site include a variety of decorative masonry units and cementitious wall board. Additional trim is provided in the form of canvas canopies, aluminum balcony railings, a variety storefronts, and the aluminum cornice element. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. .Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided. Sheltering may be accomplished with the use of canvas or metal canopies over the store fronts, and a main lobby area for the residential area. The building integrates all of the necessary service areas into the building including the trash handling area, is accessed through the parking garage under the building. ' site still needs to be reviewed by city staff to determine if it is adequate. Thisnre and must occur handling or o the thts City Council review of the project. prior this particular building has so many windows, attention and detail to the quality of the windows is important. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. solid window trim as is depicted on the submitted plans. A condition iisnlinc udedlwit staff s recommendations to require a minimum two inch thick exterior trim be applied to all windows of this building. ors Given this buildings height, it's visibility from the village green; and the numerous windows provided; the internal window treatments are also of particular concern. Staff has recommended a condition addressing the provision of uniform treatments that will complement the architectural style of the building. • • Parking Requirements Peak Hour Demand Retail Residential 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 2 per unit Factor 13,140 s.f. 120 units Parking Required 60 113 Lakewood Apartment, page 5 Parking Provided Su .lus 196 (surface & underground) Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines; the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of a p peak period is 10 PM on both weekdays and weekends. The peak periods for retail uses are identified as the on weekends. The peak period for the combined uses is 8 PM on both weekdays and weekends. 83 Lakewood Apartments Retail Use Parking Peals Residential 53 (1 PM Weekends) 57 (1O PM Weekdays and Weekends) 148 (8 PM Weekdays and Weekends) Parking Provided 196 (surface & underground) Surplus 48 IIIThe proposed use is clearly being y being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout and underground parking that the applicant has proposed with this application. • Entire Block Single Use Peak Hour Demand Varies Parking Peak (1 PM Weekdays) 200 Parking Provided ")J7 37 (surface, underground, and on- street) Surplus There are approximately 41 on- street parking spaces that can be dedicated to this block within the development, this number might be adjusted slightly as the construction of the city improvements are not complete, however, it is clear that this block is currently meeting parking standards. The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is required by the Development and Design Gui delines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for parking facilities on this block. or Lakewood Apartment, page 6 Landscaping Rea uirements 111 The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping capm� requirements of Chapter 3.6. The site plan indicates a total of 136 parking spaces within the surface parking lot. This means that the 16 tree provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot s abuts Interstate 35W, therefore plantings must occur that `screen' the metal security fence. The ro p posed landscape plan does depict deciduous trees spaced 60 feet on center, accentuated with coniferous trees; however staff is adding a condition that a minimum of four shrubs be added per tree to this landscape planter toy provide adequate screening. The shrubs shown on the planting p throughout the planter area. The 136 total surface parking, spaces provided used, and lot does not meet ad evenly the threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the parking lot. h All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments the Environmental Board as well as city staff. of Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standard Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned s of be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting being to •be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods dglea project ara. Adevelopment must is also included requiring a revised lighting plan that indicates the revised fixtures and the revised location o fop the ltuninaire located near the north entrance f e drive. This ltuninaire must be moved further to the east to avoid the garage entrance. • The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Enaineerin The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorand including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed t g um site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. ouch the Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a conditi will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved on pp roved p rior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31' regular meeting. Their comments attached and many were addressed in the landscaping portion of the staff report. Additionally, the board was Lakewood Apartment, page 7 •concerned with the recycling program for the apartment complex. Staff will include a condition requiring that a full recycling plan be submitted prior to this item being scheduled for a City Council meeting. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this project at the October 12, 2005 regular meeting, recommending approval subject to the conditions included in this staff report. • • OPTIONS 1. 3. Adopt Resolution 05 -161 approving the Final Plan for Lakewood Apartments Deny Resolution 05 -161 and the Final Plan for Lakewood Apartments Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2 Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the north entrance drive further east to avoid a conflict with the garage opening must be submitte prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. d 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A full recycling plan must be submitted for staff review prior to this item being heard by the City Council. • Lakewood Apartment; page 8 9. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 10. The developer is required to add an additional architecttua1 element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 11. All units within the residential portion of the building are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 3 5 W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. ATTACHMENTS 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandums from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Lakewood's Apartments plan set received September 27, 2005. • • Lakewood Apartment, page 9 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -161 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: Outlot A, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. ;and WHEREAS, the City has approved a final plat entitled THE VILLAGE NO. 4, which will create the arcel on which the Lake Wood Apartments is proposed to be constructed. This parcel will be described as: p Lot 1. Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ;and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Lakewood Apartments Plan Set received September 27, 2005. 2. Village No. 4 Final Plat received September 7, 2005 ;and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 12, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval. b NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the lanned unit development — final plan for the Lakewood Apartments subject to the following conditions: p 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. • • • Lakewood Apartment, page 10 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be e located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the north entrance drive further east to avoid a conflict with the garage opening must be su i prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. b Witted 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with stafft i d this block of the development. 8. A full recycling plan must be submitted for staff review Council. o identify the most 9. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided ards for the site appropriate location for bicycle parking within prior to this item being heard by the City in accordance with the development stand 10. The developer is required to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the buildin to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 11. All units within the residential portion of the building are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor g SEH October 6, 2005 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lakewood Apartments Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.10 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Lakewood Apartments site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. Place handicap accessible parking signs in front of the accessible parking stall rather than the accessible parking aisle 2. A street light is shown in the SW corner of the parking lot. This light should be moved out of the parking lot and into the island behind the curb to the north. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. Silt fence needs to be shown around the perimeter of the construction zone. 2. The trench drain outlet pipe, as shown, will conflict with the water main. A note should be placed on the plans to indicate the water main should be installed deeper at the crossing to avoid this conflict. 3. The main line of storm sewer from CBMH -106 to FES -100 appears to be considerably deeper than needed. This results in the need for large diameter pipe at very shallow slopes and will make construction difficult due to the deep trenches. It is recommended that this storm sewer be revised to reduce the unnecessary depth, which will then allow increased slopes and reduced pipe sizes. 4. Hydrology calculations should be done to verify that the grate capacity of CBMH -108 is sufficient for the amount of runoff it will receive. Two catch basins may be required in this location to handle the amount of runoff generated in a 10 -year storm event. 5. The sanitary sewer note stating, "Connect to existing stub. IE= 893.61" should instead have an invert of 892.61 instead. 6. It is recommended that the water main in the northern end of the site be revised to have an 8 "x8" cross connecting the service stub, hydrant, and water main loop which runs through the proposed Woods Edge Hotel site rather than the two 8 "x8" tees currently shown. 7. An 8" gate valve should be installed on the water main run leading to the Woods Edge Hotel site. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite 8, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com I 715.236.4000 I 715.234.4069 fax - 108 - • • Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 Page 2 Please call me at 65 1.765 2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. I . I Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer ku' IinuH0305 I0`plan revicw..lakeuoodap1 s 1110(105 signcd.doe -109- • • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Ede Lakewood Apartments: Plant Schedule: Crimson King maple should be changed to a species that is a bit more zone appropriate and non - invasive. Suggest of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, t changing Autumn species to Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Colorado Blue Spruce to White Spruce or Norway Spruce. Green Suggest changing the Caution and care should be taken to ensure vehicular sit -lines are not obstructed. Trees should be at least 30 feet from street corners. Eastern Red Cedars proposed for the NE corner of the building may be too close. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils should be described as incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. RecvclinQ There should be a plan for organized recycling within the apartment building. Developer should work with staff on landscaping. Work with a waste service provider to make sure the plan is functional. Encourage a recycling plan. Motion by Kukonen, second by O'Connell to recommend approval with staff and Environmental Board comments and recommendations. All were in favor. Motion was approved. =on /F\ z 0 02 0< c¢ cz 2-C 0 z 0 N O :11313WfW J33HS SOOZ L d3S 7§ 4 9 9 ) d § ,• h � § • / :1NVnnSNO7 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN °° eN 9) " d§ m $!§ li - 3c k� /% 2z »x On 20 w m O> qQ zz �� �7 \\ k » ® m ; © § LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC \ [ Will | # / E 1» / \ ,/ , d fi C3.0 W'2< l i \\ 2G ARCHITECT /ENGINEER -'- UTILITY NOTES: -- A. PLANNER I. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND TY i HARTFORD ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC "I.j•I_ . ([�ji F so FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER '"'"`- -" OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (851 -454 -0002 OR P`POP`Om • - BOO -252 -1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. • 9� »--" -ya-- »- .�y�_P 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT I Mm! �T u. Nb W., m�l6aRm CBMH -103 icy . , EDITION OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND FWM W an P w0 m6 E(SE) =898.20 RE)901l02 >_ &T-�' >Y-- ---yX -- T�6 STORM SERVICE 'SANITARY BY THEAND CITY • be y 4 �' 444 0 %1 IE(5)- 892.39 23fi' -33' RCP O 0.155 IE(SW) 891.01 �y�� >�y>�-- �+Ay -�> 1'dM CITY REQUIREMENTS. MINNESOTA, ANO SHALL CONFORM 11/// IE(SW) =Ei91.99 -: I ( 4, DEFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HOR120NTAL 0e. Hem 0 1023 IE(NE)= 891.]9 IE(NE) =890.44 3BI' -62' RCP O 0.105 STUN-101 O. REFER T AND LAYOUT. / J7' -8' PVC O 1.040 � i IE =88045 71' -8' PVC O 1.045 5. ALL WATER HIRE SHALL BE DUCTILE 1RCIV PIPE (DIP) 0.455 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONSULTANT: 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYNNYL CHLORIDE ""' - - \ FES -100 PIPE (PVC) SDP 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RD -112 54' -42' RCP O 0.105 IE =890.00 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONREIE RE =90500 6D-1,] PIPE (RCP) UNLESS O7H06 55 NOTED. 723 IE =90000 - _' 5.489151 / 8. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF 9 JZ(18 R� O _ /' STRUCTURES 6y `1D 4852; 0 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE Yye 66 r ' }°' SURFED 0.115 FEET PER DETAILS. 44 ELEVATIONSR5H0 ONE THIS PLAN D0 NOT REFLECT 5UMPED ELEVATIONS. 15 ®0 '.,p,.. D HYDRANTS 5 FEE 7 BEHIND SACK OF CURE UNLESS OTHERWISE 60750. T B A -. ...•. ..• '0 - . _--'• __ 11, 5' 05 10 247 WATERMNNS AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. • HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SMALL BE INCIDENTAL 15 A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTES. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE OWNER: REOUREO TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 16" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA • • - PO DEPTH WATEAMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. LEGACY /� 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND HOLDINGS-LL, LLC 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTNTES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ,"' ! -- J 14, COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND 6w 441 c1036 Mls M.N'}1g 10 EMS WITHIN THE BUILDING WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAYANOS. 23660M IRK. 64 128' -2a' RCP O 1.93% O0 y90 W9q'�' ,,/•.----;.---z-, - 50.MyDO1 PE`gFYWg1�`5 9 1 ( 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF NEW M2- 766-1201 HYDRANT W/CV / d-�'SWI° e06�'S Q‘P'. I ADJACENT I CONTRACTORS SYSTEM. ND CITY STAFF. RAINS 1WTH GROUND EUCE -11 .8 W' 441° P`�' B'%fi' REDUCER E� Ifi. CONTRACTOR O0 $HALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS 2- fi' -t5' BENDS �� - THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO PROJECT: • 8" 647E VALVE ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. sTMH -loo e- TEE RE =9-5.8 1E4894.46 //-Er 911 69 0 STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: - } rr V WATER6AI6 (fiE�q'JO' $1RILCTIIRF VY S],E 6-STINv //� �N\ / B �OTIi[RS 0 % MN -1 Mr DIA. R -1642 .`,z .- MH -2 123' -10' RCP O 4805 S7MH- DIA. P -1642 / /f�\ \; RE4004.60 _ 101 66' DIA. F -1642 126' -24' RCP 0 0.255-4,...„„4... � TI" \j \ IE =B9 }.42 '�- CBMH -103 56' DIA. R- 3067 -0 CBMH -103 Sr 010. R- 3087 -0 65414-708 RE =90330 STMH -104 Mr DIA. 6-1642 / IE(5) =B9 &69 6994 -105 48" DIA. R -1042 / / 8" PLUG \1J\ IE(N)= 888.29 CBMH- 106 a8' DIA. 6-3067-V LEGACY AT ^ W CBMH -107 48' 014. R- 3°67 -V I� O- B• e' -225' BEND . • .. ///n /f/ 30 -8" PVC O OART CBMH -108 4B' D10. R- 306] -V STUB IE -891St G\ 8'- 11.25' BEND "^ _ STMH -109 48' DIA R -I6a2 WOODS EDGE STMH -105 �'.� ®o�' h RE =804.80 E =884671 \ro\ 16=892.97 • NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EG1AL 34 -24' RCP O 0.205 ' - 1 ! (FIELD EXISTING B APARTMENT CBI/H-106 B ( _A • �!� \ _ APARTMENTS IE(SW)4695.64 % / - IEcSE)- 895.44 / 1 \ ° °D- - LINO LAKES / - /�_�'°�r� MINNESOTA T / O CONNECT TO E%ISTNC STUB ,./ 7S -12" RCP " -- ' �� 8E4902.30 IE =89].61 (FIELD VERIFY) \\ O 8.055 1140' -15' RCP O ].975. @ =899.14 • /V '' `CBMH -105 J / / ' Tn1 RE =905.32 �(Y(( IE =901.52 /. 105 -8" PVC O 1.505 STM -109 /, 0,. k85P5544b047 RE =ofi.T5 , 78' -8' PVC O 1.985 �''� �, . •• �. IIP ' li`� pD -m ISSUE: / RE =912.87 IE =903.00 , 06/15/95 CRY AIfiMIRAt 09/27/06 REV PER CRY 1 0/24 /� 4 PO „4 RE =906.0 • RD -110 IE =90].06 I RE 44 0 .1 / IE =90100 ;o; 4} 0 . r A REV. THIS SHEET / i 59 YT '' A 6 4 YY 0 N REV. THIS SHEET >/ 65 0 50 El .!_� k 4 , ( 5 E SHEET TITLE: -. EXTEND 6' PVC STUB 7 /% I ■ e' DIP STUB W /5V (BY OTHERS) E' UTIUTY 1. i. ... - __ / 8' PVC STUB (BY OTHERS) F] V Q n- 1 @ Pry L qi � � i" . PLAN o . EXTEND 8' 047 STUB 7 -- - SHEET NUMBER: FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C4e0 • 0 6PY61Gf most .NRRMO RPOMp 46. RIC 6b6Rn5/6A611,666.R4p06 z 21 kpa ZA ■< \K 0 z 0 1 0 ;~ m §m e> 7, ( E\ k 2 § ■ 0 §2 [9 \ 0 \ § } 2 § [ 4tR, z 0 -11 710 O 70 70 xi O <• C '- C C 0 z C') ra ca r - (J1 aai+Lbbi.�'eae .ubb= A:n".inmb ?boo g 1 3 NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. IAN. Z 9 5' 9q A F m D I10Y38 31340N00 S331 210J 0NINOve PROP. UNE Io 1 C4.1 UTILITY DETAILS zp a, "1� G -m „1 1p a M -)'°' pr- zZ ›m OM V 3 p�D Q O� z0 OD Gl D( NQ m—I o (m 1 p 8 15 T ## of LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC :1NdllnsNo3 F a a. E 1,11 iii Oil :6;0 1 • , \) / \) p • ! � § / / § oAI - • • T -_ \— - z� ^ z ®i!if1 « -1 ■.9l/t MV OS GARAGE LEVEL BLDG. FLOOR PLAN � y z q� o o 0< J2 -1 P3 0 o� 0 z r 171 - r i \ j 5310N 1Y2:13N30 30VVO PI EA % 2 § ,�ro0 §§$§ 4 m 0R R = § f k� in >� _ r > /4 kR > >] mq \ II PROJECT NUMBER: , m LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP ` \ f/ g \a § { §| | » ARCHITECT /ENGINEER ��� 72 q Ek / Q$ s V■ ' .) § ��% |. |..,.1DO" i '.......'. !C $Q ` ms r- > $ \/ k/® \ kR / §!| ■ § �\ waiaa| § §9e(1 gg §§k§§§Itil . ;; ;;,,,M ------ .... OP i...i■ ..... | ;��, ■ : :., -§ ,1138 WIN 13314S FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 97, /§ m !C $Q ` ms r- > $ \/ k/® \ kR / ■\ kk § . § �\ LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP k ( § ;3°. VWId 20014 13A31 ®NO93S 66' -O" 178' -6" a= 58 9p Ai RG Ai 5 tlE 8 89 98 8 9 oz OPi 18 !:113 1 $ 8 11 3 $ - Fil Elfzg �a� $ it34 ACS ` W1T g < Ei®$ a €PI 1 ;"'G7 mR3 carM ,4885 8 9y 9 e Pr-SE 2q11 tea^ Roi 10 1 0 m z m r 2 4' }2u• M OeltS t u C >. "O� 0 cn N PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP ,,, ,. $ z ;tat° $ i S Y J ®ball m ____ a ____ii, 6 e :t39Wf1N 133HS SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN QD z A T t u C >. "O� 0 cn N PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP A g ,i..• 1 ....di ----- - --Ili WEE E .MA 1 1 Mil i la" Mil; i imeA . ---- - ----PP ii Mal PO il iiiii i l§m9 ,2139WCIN 133HS 2133 NI9N3 /1731IH7Ntl `" p= _� i0 mr7 c (f) -< mO '10 N� ��" 2133 NI9N3 /1731IH7Ntl mo 00 2133 NI9N3 /1731IH7Ntl 1 I I 1 i NV1d 21001.4 13831 do011 3i111133HS i TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN z 0 m O X A xi O m O C z m —1 M O C z O 0 0 g Lp� 0i F �3p� To' 0014. m a o 80g if•t�'= Y� —tom y._ y. !. a. —it_ y_t 'a._t. '_itl' 0-441 e NIA IN rECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD QRO A C. i11 MIS ■iSYflti iii �;�® r---a ■_ rl, � `r11F =111 ii i� 4 II Lr ■ II 1 _.LI_ - ..._Liu,' ° 'x $0 \-0 ir� 1 N'_ -_ ', p .1 N s ro 5 A g, L'J i intaiir - 9 A — ir-€ IIO y l �• —_ gP IT- �, O 3 Ir _... 1 - "" z I, _ 0� H a ooh 111‘4*-411F41W a]. -4_ lor - 1 ►1/ W f 1 � 1_ Is- L p90 IL ____._ ,, _ Ff �1_� �r i0._II „. 'N, 1 y -SV4 I ' '�1 4., I`-...� I ., I II _..._. �I —I a pA I- ijVL 1 o r Ic001 Ii O _ L J _ F Pg -�� t0f55�� 33C m � o m 33C b r B o `L i g p b s0 B `5 • 1 VI ■ -t6 —tom y._ y. !. a. —it_ y_t 'a._t. '_itl' 0-441 e NIA IN rECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD QRO A C. ■ VIII ■_ rl, � `r11F =111 ii i� 4 II Lr ■ II 1 isT, '*'4, ', p .1 N i” ro L'J i intaiir - 9 A — ir-€ IIO y l _10114A4 �, O Ir _... 1 - "" z I, _ 0� H a ooh 111‘4*-411F41W a]. -4_ lor - 1 ►1/ W f ri � n 17 j -;I w: O It'll c •- O p90 IL ____._ ,, Ff �1_� �r i0._II „. 'N, 1 y -SV4 I ' , itl_ 0LOI6 I -;t t0 -C ' -to • 6' -6' t¢ -6• ,r-, {II: 7. TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN �t0 W m Q 0 0 D m m 0 0 ;n -O Z 7710 z Gf .0 01 co .. if h � -a g1 t �� =! —tom y._ y. !. a. —it_ y_t 'a._t. '_itl' 0-441 e NIA IN rECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD QRO A C. 1 rl, � `r11F =111 i� 4 II Lr ■ II 1 I[pt_�I IQ p .1 N 1 i'' IIO y l _10114A4 �, O Ir 1 - "" z I, _ 0� H a ooh 111‘4*-411F41W a]. -4_ _ 8 fy% O If •� •.mow _ rig P 6•_I. r-sh- — 7•_,- if h � -a g1 t �� =! e NIA IN rECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD QRO A C. 1 ri., . !lia O Lr 0 II 1 I[pt_�I p .1 N 1 i'' IIO y l _10114A4 �, O Ir co z — n ujt -. Z "t1 2 P O ' n 17 j -;I w: O It'll c •- O p90 IL ____._ ,, iir �1_� �r i0._II „. 'N, 1 y -SV4 cps :i139Wf1N 133HS 31111133Hs c v Z r F if h � -a g1 t �� =! — i ii I Bev 8 rECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD QRO A C. a A 2 rd39WIN 133HE 3111113314S c co m0 La N S m m co rn 0 DU 0 0 - -I m -n 0 0 z N\fld HOOld 01001:1Cl28 HI z 0 -nO O X1 Xi 73 O 111 O 5 zm a'- �z 73 0 0 z O I D r ZG) � To, m r NEW 3 .'d o ....,,........„ ,� �_� iviari 7 I IN lair 1 Trie y r I -i1- 0 - ,, �fI: - FPI to _ Tv _ .'t. E 11. . E -- r N y ; 11 U1 Fu ' 1 EE. 1 L1 L I T �. �� ":� m J 1_1 n I „o I, w 1 - un I - - - -- QI r if IOD 1 i _11 Hi.- 14B I.ar� p� 44 ■I I `N � 7 ....01, \ y I , ; g yc L 1 III z � II � � f6 ' gf. :60,�c -- — \ m �� 1 i __ i njT 8,,,,, • < ' 33, 1 G Il NT I cl) . F-----D.„--, ._____ _____ T3j r Er] -==.= P RC H ono 5 1_�V� , J eesi 3 .'d o ....,,........„ ,� �_� iviari S. 4' I II li oil y r I -i1- �I1 • 11 iU1I4* I I I _ • , �1 .'t. E 11. . E -- r N y Q U 11 4 ' 1 EE. 1 L I T �. �� ":� 1_1 I ■.. w e. NI 1 i _11 Hi.- 14B I.ar� p� ■I mim R 9 7 ....01, \ y I , ; g yc L 1 III z � II � — gf. :60,�c \ m 1 � fn_.� 5 i njT 8,,,,, • < ' 33, g G Il NT I cl) , _. ._ F-----D.„--, ._____ _____ T3j -==.= P RC H ono 1_�V� , J eesi 2•-35- m0^ � - mmr °ZGG)i Zg (26 y0Tim m 11 T m y V -uz 3' -3 ? � o o m Sn§ 392 iviari S. 4' I II li oil y r irir � I I I • , �1 [ 1 N . 11. . CO -- r o 11 11 4 1,a ILL f40 �. �� ":� 1 w e. Hi.- 14B ■I mim R 9 7 ....01, \ y I , ; g yc L 1 III z � II � 0n g gf. :60,�c m � fn_.� 5 i njT 8,,,,, • < ' __, .ij_-_''' ' I cl) , _. ._ F-----D.„--, ._____ _____ T3j -==.= P RC H 3I -uz 3' -3 ? � o o m Sn§ 392 iviari I, I irir � I I I • 1 ,' n o 11 11 4 . f40 1 ■I mim R 9 7 ....01, \ y I , ; 1 0n g gf. :60,�c � fn_.� i 8 11 I cl) , _. ._ F-----D.„--, ._____ _____ T3j -==.= P RC H 3I eesi - gfflalPiEllgillE °' 3' 3' =. rn m CU rn 0 0 0 m z --� O 0 z 0 - -n -0 0 7b %Q A O • < M XI - 0 Z 0 r- d 0 oSic mF� m3pc THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN 5 ) IIiJIrr!Jir2tI r e q. X g 8 n o _ E� � i. Ln 3 yi �zz O m I � I fi11�����:9 1 �1 ■_, t\ ►a�'l..�,... ��1l.' .... 9 m0N! LLAH _TD PARTNERSHIP I \/Q 4r 2 Y a a ` Ili r1': ry J 41) a L Ii S=� �, 1104=11 I 1 I I ;Lou -i )'i, — 8 r q Y'- P1- m i _ P 1 m gI:i i8 IN PT 0 ` '��tiO f i I .... . IL`J i O N ^ ,::---4, �, JL \ ' il, itti; ■ _ - 1 9 °Q0 ^_('L_i ❑or_il6j ir_;1 - Aellerella g i P . =, __ � __ i — 114111i I - J, «j 1 le' -IV 7.11 ill e L4 i NM 92V3 ma s 5 r e q. X g 8 n o _ E� � i. Ln 3 yi �zz O m Lill I � I fi11�����:9 'n �1 ■_, t\ ►a�'l..�,... ��1l.' .... 9 o LLAH _TD PARTNERSHIP a __••YY 2 Y a a CO O 1 U 0 S Ell J 41) a L Ii S=� �, 1104=11 I 1 I I ;Lou -i )'i, — 8 r q Y'- P1- m i I , .... . IL`J O N woo— II ,::---4, D >MO lira 17:40 FAI-omil ■ _ - 1 o . __ 114111i 1 le' -IV 5 A W Ln 3 yi �zz O m s �A a 5 bD �,0� 3 0a 0 9 o LLAH _TD PARTNERSHIP a OK :131 y} i 'Ill i. } 1 ro C7 NOIldn313 1Sd3— H1l0S -1S'd3 1117..! •-:-:. 9, 4 , vill IV 11-,-=, lim lira; — _ • II iga ....ii .---, $ . f 'ft Iii itIii 31 110 F/MI. 11.1111 UR 11.1) 111 01 TTTI .11.1 { • Ns INN1 IN, 1 ri. O. I-- . I A . il MI 1 1mm, 1111 1 !HI HI 11 I- I I IRE I I — 1 Nit AMIE 1 I laied iw_i • 1 fl.. 1 1 _11; II I 11 lal I II 1 well ., 1!I1,pI11I 14 11 gill 1 111 nrrd II 1 1 II3 lim 1111 .1111 TO 11E1 NM MN MN I M Na 1 diIi1h1 1 2 = • . - =-_-_ - m- - Fm- - O I iiii .. !! !Hi .. Hi .111 1 11:111 l la 1 _ e I i r :------): r 1111 IIIIII I III I . ir . II I/ 011 111111111 1,,,,, 11 11 IN NM I •?' II li ' II MEI MN I NE III . ): 4... , •: • , f_- F 61f 4 -1, NN 1 o.w . ii : )• Mit Imi MINIMA. low • .. 0 ' .. • .." .., MT .. ..•;tiiglup, mum ,urri jIlif 1 1 H ' il li 1 li HMI 1 114 1111 111111 104 lillb 1 ffftI: [ .. .. .. L 1 .. Ks 1 ' . 1 tw , I .. mil is 1. ma it ilMil gr illi . +HI ill. -Hi 1:7] _ ' i.• iiim1.iip It .11.1.1 -- 1 I • INIII ri iMi MN im 111 ill mmHg!, 1 1 w ii" . 1 IIIII I_1 • , 1=1 f MN - 1.. 0 — . .1--____I I1 MI 1 MINION 111 air UM , 1 1 M Ii■J, I 11 U 111- El _111 ____ :Bird Ill 11 HEE WAWA - I - ... 1 ---- j1,- — — I "-- . NOILVA 313 1S'd 3 — H1 f10S N0LLVA 3 H1f10S 8 15.5313 0305,113 UO3 EVY /l WS 335 :a38W(1N 133H5 5 9 LA, "2> m* WI > -;-s 00-1> 0 m0 Q m 0 v) 3 r J IF a33NIDN3 /1331IHONV .r.... 1 I 1 N • 1 , V' 1 ; . . 1 --- 31 110 F/MI. •IMI II 1 Hill TTTI MO { • INN1 IN, 1 ri. O. 1 1 1 111 In IRE AMIE 1 nrift,i 1 mil laied 1 1 fl.. 1 1 witi 11 - I 1 - , nrrd II 1 II3 lim 1111 .1111 NM MN MN • M Na 1 al . 1 .. .. !! .. l la .. _ e r :------): r Mt III . WI NM it IN NM I •?' II li . ): 4... , 111"" .••• ism 1 61f 4 -1, NN 1 o.w . ii Mit Imi MINIMA. low • ow 0 ' i1111 • -MT MT ..•;tiiglup, mum ,urri 1 1 L 1 ----' ------ , 1 ' . 1 tw , I _ r 1 1-- ilMil I. d . • 1:7] i.• 17 wi • ri mom im 111 ill mmHg!, 1 1 w ii" . I_1 • , 1 _l 111111 1.. 0 — .1--____I I1 MINION 111 air IHI 11111 , awl Ii■J, — U Eiiiiii araial ____ :Bird IIIME rimil HEE WAWA :a38W(1N 133H5 5 9 LA, "2> m* WI > -;-s 00-1> 0 m0 Q m 0 v) 3 r J IF a33NIDN3 /1331IHONV 1101 IS' -- IUH- i ■il 4139N(1N 133NS n ®D eN -- Z A � C r' G = � � rilp � f?' Q laq E901 ;%1 11111111 MO =Ns ii NI Ili III in UM Mi Nil b:HU III 11110 ill ql`A VI IR MI 1 1 1 - ••- •• WI: - 1 :: - r li , 4- • .1112In . IN Is 111 0 lit NM 1 Jo MIMI INN IN i 1 lig: 1101 IS' -- IUH- i ■il 4139N(1N 133NS n ®D eN -- Z A � C r' G = � � rilp � f?' Q laq E901 ;%1 C .a ri -e I. z 0 0 XI n ru 0 • N011VAT13 0302:1V1N3 0 0 n � A z g PPP u zi -NOWO 1N1A N3ANC JNI11-1 31ON6 Ofd TANIA 0 LP -go-lo vIJS' J 'PIfIV ,g 0 8 _7} n e. Ilf0 .26 SHEET NUMBER: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET TITLE REV. THIS SHEET 0140 REV. THIS SHE Y m e; Sr ›, o m� m sow rri "4 mQ n rrnn0 o PROJECT NUMBER: _ . `� - a� 0� k _, pr ,� Igaf� saes' 3`^1 ='H1I IT ED, 9 q P @J BWf1N .133Hs ENLARGED ELEVATIONS 97. P » :f !.l |& 1 2 \ ] g 6 ! !m r ?t'; IIMKFA -03020 1210359NiflRff 1�.E (99}74181 Fos 1991.74181 PROJECT I�. OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP , || § ; \ R |l..� 1 f`: )/ » :f !.l |& 1 2 \ ] g 6 ! MCI WON 133HS ENLARGED ELEVATIONS I pp Oz p x 4 t r7r g m X MCI WON 133HS ENLARGED ELEVATIONS pp Oz p x t r7r g m X v -i irn � n� g s o ` �am �rn OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP a rn 5 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6.C.v Paul Bengtson October 24, 2005 Final Plan — Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). Though a Hotel is not currently listed as a permissible use in Chapter 3 of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, included on this agenda is a staff initiated amendment to the Planned Unit Development to allow a Hotel as a permissible use in the commercial districts. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The layout generally follows the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout, with the exception of the combination of lots 11 and 12 to create a single lot. The main entry of the building will be from the parking lot, which is atypical for this type of urban development. However, a secondary access is provided on the building front to service registered guests of the hotel. The proposed Hotel is located in a Commercial Land Use Area were acceptable Building Type is Commercial with a minimum number of floors for all uses of one and a maximum of 3. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The Regulating Plan does not indicate any `Required Building Entries' on this site, nor any `Gateways'. However, an `Architectural Feature' is indicated on the plans at the point that Town Center Parkway curves to the east. • Legacy Hotel, page 3 this location is to attract the eye of pedestrians and create a point of visual interest. The central portion of the hotel attempts to accomplish this by being stepped closer to the streetscape, with the masonry materials that over the entire central section of the building, and with the porch element at the base of the structure. Staff feels that these collective elements satisfy the `architectural feature' requirement of the Regulating Plan. The masonry materials that cover the entire central portion of the building on both the front and back clearly accentuate the location of the buildings main entry points. The continuation of masonry materials across the first floor of the entire structure accentuates the scale of the building clearly differentiating the first floor from the rest of the structure. This is furthered by the porches on the ends of the building and surrounding the secondary access which bring the building to a more human scale. The quoins at the corner work to provide some definition to the breaks in the building facade, furthering the visual impact of the steps in the building elevations. The base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of the brick base applied across the entire building facade on all sides; however, the height of the brick base betrays the scale of the building making the first floor look out of scale with the floors above. Staff is recommending a condition that the brick base be raised from its current level to lessen the gap between the cap and the windows of the second floor and correct the scale issue. The top of the building is also clearly articulated with the use of the peaked roof and gable trim. This type of roof dictates that space for mechanical equipment must be provided within the building or outside the building on the ground. If any mechanical equipment is located on the ground it will be required to be screened by a combination of landscaping and screen walls. eThe building materials proposed for the site include brick, cultured stone, E.I.F.S., and asphaltic roofing material. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided. Patrons of the establishment will also be offered shelter from the elements in the entry vestibules /porches. A trash enclosure is depicted on the north side of the site adjacent to Interstate 35W. This structure will need to be constructed of the same materials as the main building on site, and should include a roof since the height of the building will allow patrons of the hotel to look down upon the enclosure. Additional mechanical /service area is provided on the first floor of the building in the southwest comer, hence the lack of windows on this portion of the building. Because this particular building has so many windows, attention and detail to the quality of the windows is important. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. Sometimes this shadow can be created with solid window trim as is depicted on the submitted plans. A condition is included with staff's recommendations to require a minimum two inch thick exterior trim be applied to all windows of this building. Staff is also recommending that the windows on the first floor be better accentuatued with additional trim features. Given this buildings height; it's visibility from the streetscape and the future townhome portion of the project; and the numerous windows provided; the internal window treatments are also of particular concern. Staff has • • Legacy Hotel, page 4 recommended a condition addressing the provision of uniform treatments that will complement the architectural style of the building. Parking Requirements Single Use Peak Hour Demand 1 space per room Rooms 83 Parking Required 83 Parking Provided 85 (surface & on- street) Surplus 2 Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This portion of the site (Block 2b) is intended to use standard parking calculations and not be included into the shared parking analysis. As such, each individual use will be required to provide the appropriate number of parking spaces with on site parking (surface and /or underground) and on- street parking. Hotel Parking Requirement Office (Bldg 13) Office (Bldg 14) 1 space per room 3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. Parking Factor 83 rooms 27,000 s.f. 27,000 s.f. Total Parking Required 83 81 81 245 Parking Provided 85 101 91 277 Surplus 20 10 32 The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. Block 2b Single Use Peak Hour Demand Varies Parking Required 245 Parking Provided 277 Surplus 32 As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for bicycle parking facilities on this block. Landscaping Requirements The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6. The site plan indicates a total of 81 parking spaces within the surface parking lot. This means that the 13 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot abuts Interstate 35W, therefore plantings must occur that `screen' the metal security fence. The proposed landscape plan does depict deciduous trees spaced 60 feet on center, accentuated with coniferous trees; however staff is adding a condition that a minimum of four shrubs be added per tree to this landscape planter to provide adequate screening. The shrubs shown on the planting pallet should be used, and should be spread evenly *throughout the planter area. The 81 total surface parking spaces provided in this lot does not meet or exceed the Legacy Hotel, page 5 threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the •Parkin lot. • • All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments of the Environmental Board as well as city staff. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. Staff has recommended a condition that will coordinate the parking lot lighting within the entire development and will be included on all of the Legacy at Woods Edge projects. It is also recommended that the Domus luminaire located near the south entrance drive be moved further west to better illuminate the drive. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance must be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this project at the October 12, 2005 regular meeting, recommending approval subject to a total of 18 conditions. Revisions to the site plan and elevations have addressed the issues the Board had about the trash enclosure and the re- siting of the building closer to the right of way. These revisions are not included with this report but will be included in the Friday update. The developer has raised concerns in regards to three of the conditions that are being forwarded with the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation: • The developer is encouraged to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. • Legacy Hotel, page 6 • The gable end visible from Town Center Parkway, on the east wing of the building, shall be clad in brick. • The developer is encouraged to use a standing seam metal roof. The first was recommended by staff and was not removed by the Planning and Zoning Board, but in the discussion during the meeting, the Board felt that the revised elevations presented by the developer at the meeting where clearly an improvement in regards to the treatment of the central portion of the building. Staff has now had a chance to review the revised elevations and agrees with the assessment of the Planning and Zoning Board. As such staff is recommending that this condition be removed from the Resolution prior to the approval of the City Council. The second condition came directly from the Planning and Zoning Board, and the developer does not agree that adding additional brick to the elevation will enhance the building. In fact they feel that it will detract from the `architectural feature' currently proposed for the central element of the building; and that it will de- emphasize the entrance provided on the Town Center Parkway frontage. The developer will have a representative at the meeting to explain their reasoning to the council. The condition is included below, but can be removed by the City Council prior to approval. The third condition above was strictly a suggestion of the Board, not a requirement. The asphalt shingles proposed for the building are not prohibited by the Town Center Design and Development Guide, and therefore it is an appropriate material. The developer will be available at the City Council meeting to highlight the behind the use of asphalt shingles instead of steel roofing. Since this condition was a suggestion that *reasoning the developer has reviewed and has reasoning to reject, staff is recommending that it be removed prior to the approval of the City Council. • OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 05 -162, approving the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) 2. Deny Resolution 05 -162 for the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites), subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. • • • Legacy Hotel, page 7 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the south entrance drive further west must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 9. All hotel room windows are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 10. The first floor windows shall be accentuated with additional trim features. 11. The brick base shall be raised to lessen the gap between the cap and the second story windows. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 14. The developer is encouraged to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 15. The gable end visible from Town Center Parkway, on the east wing of the building, shall be clad in brick. 16. The developer is encouraged to use a standing seam metal roof. ATTACHMENTS 1. SEH memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) plan set received September 27, 2005. 4. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) revised site plan and elevations (to follow) • • Legacy Hotel, page 8 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05-162 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LEGACY HOTEL (COUNTRY INN AND SUITES). WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: ; and Outlot A, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the City has approved a final plat entitled THE VILLAGE NO. 4, which will create the parcel on which the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) is proposed to be constructed. This parcel will be described as: Lot 4, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ; and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Plan Set received September 27, 2005. 2. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Site Plan and Elevation received October 17, 2005. 3. Village No. 4 Final Plat received September 7, 2005 ;and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 12, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan for the Hotel at Apollo Landing subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities. must • be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. • • Legacy Hotel, page 9 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the south entrance drive further west must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 9. All hotel room windows are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 10. The first floor windows shall be accentuated with additional trim features. 11. The brick base shall be raised to lessen the gap between the cap and the second story windows. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 14. The developer is encouraged to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 15. The gable end visible from Town Center Parkway, on the east wing of the building, shall be clad in brick. 16. The developer is encouraged to use a standing seam metal roof. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. ATTEST: 41) Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor 1J � SEH October 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Woods Edge Hotel Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.08 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Woods Edge Hotel site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. It is unclear what type of curb is planned for the front of the accessible parking aisles. If the curb isn't ribbon curb, pedestrian curb ramps need to be provided. Further clarification is needed as to where the ribbon curb is located on the site and what is proposed for the end of the accessible parking aisles. 2. According to ADA rules, there should be 4 accessible parking stalls and access aisles for the 81 -space parking lot as shown. Currently, only 3 are being provided. 3. The accessible parking signs are shown in front of the accessible parking aisles rather than the parking stalls. The signs should be moved to the front of the parking stalls. 4. The easterly entrance has a note calling out "Bit curb and gutter..." This should be corrected to be concrete curb and gutter. 5. A hotel check - in/drop -off sign is shown as being located in the drive aisle near the main entrance. All signage must be located behind the curb out of any drive aisles or parking areas. 6. A light pole is shown in the middle of an accessible parking stall east of the main entrance. Grading and Utility Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. The storm sewer running from CBMH 102 to the flared end section is at approximately the same elevation as the 12" trunk water main. The storm sewer should be revised to provide a minimum of 1.5' of vertical clearance. 2. It is unclear why CBMH 103 and CBMH 102 are over 10 feet in depth. It appears that these plans, along with the Lakewood Apartment plans, could be revised to significantly decrease depth, increase slopes, and reduce pipe sizes on the main trunk storm sewer line. 3. No provisions are made in the trunk storm sewer line for future connections at the lot to the northeast. It is recommended that manholes be placed in the storm line from CBMH 102 to STMH 101 such that future stonn sewer connections can be made in this undeveloped lot. 4. At the southeast corner of the building, there is approximately 30' of sidewalk that will tip back towards the building. If this is correct, additional grading detail should be shown in this area to indicate how runoff will be directed away from the building. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite 13, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax -139- • • Mr. Michael Grochala October 6, 2005 Page 2 5. An 8" gate valve should be provided on the service stub running to the building. 6. Rather than showing a proposed temporary hydrant to be installed, it is recommended that the hydrant be installed in its permanent location and the water main in the northern end of the site be revised to have an 8 "x8" cross connecting the service stub, hydrant, and water main loop which runs through the proposed Lakewood Apartments site rather than the configurations shown on the Lakewood Apartments plan and this plan set. 7. Silt fence is not indicated on the plans. Silt fence must encompass all construction areas, including the overland storm sewer pipe. 8. Wood fiber blanket is required to be used on any disturbed steep slopes such as the storm sewer outlet pipe run to the pond and along the edge of the parking lot on the northeast side of the site. General Comments 1. There are a number of locations where text is on top of text and is very difficult to read. All text should be easily readable. Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer x:\ko \lino) \030508\plan review \woodscdgchote1100605 - eneineering.doc - 140 - • Recommendations Lino Lakes Envirortcnentat Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Legacy Hotel: Plant Schedule: Recommend the following changes based on the Plant Schedule - -- Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. Change Greenspire Linden to Redmond Linden (a cultivar of the American Linden). Change Colorado Blue Spruce to White or Norway Spruce. If salt spray is a concern along the freeway (usually within 60 feet), Black-Hills Spruce and Ginkgo may be more tolerant, than eastern Red Cedar and Linden. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils should be described as incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. Work with staff on lighting and ensuring that lighting meets the minimum standard. Motion to approve recommendations by Bauman, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -162 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LEGACY HOTEL (COUNTRY INN AND SUITES). WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: Outlot A, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. ; and WHEREAS, the City has approved a final plat entitled THE VILLAGE NO. 4, which will create the parcel on which the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) is proposed to be constructed. This parcel will be described as: Lot 4, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ; and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Plan Set received September 27, 2005. 2. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Site Plan and Elevation received October 18, 2005. 3. Village No. 4 Final Plat received September 7, 2005 ; and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 12, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan for the Hotel at Apollo Landing subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites Page 2 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the south entrance drive further west must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 9. All hotel room windows are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 10. The first floor windows shall be accentuated with additional trim features. 11. The brick base shall be raised to lessen the gap between the cap and the second story windows. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 14. The two gable ends on the Town Center Parkway frontage shall be completely clad in brick. This shall include the returns as required by the Town Center Development & Design Guidelines. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk a n m D F g 2 0, MIOO 31BISS3 OY m z F D F STABIIJZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE a_o gi vpi O A EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY 'o rT 8 ; \ �� m / • F 4„ . N ,,A All40 '4411410 itiF ...„4.1 Amp gym? t n ** 2T i PFDl 1 • AV 0 l 11 O ` 9 0 m zm 0 ,yL c z 0 z CO P1 n) l�u \` K dg 2 Eq du 2 81 A K 0 11 f.ct 48" ,pg$fa P9 m$$ Fad; 2° 8§P '21r49 taA. AT Y C FJ $a n -i°Ni 7m g N$Fm P" XPiir i8 2" 4r Mel mmg NR 8 2m, s4Ai Ei tgeA 471; 205 t2at Pm g Z 9FT Amx $mF q-16 ~m m FILE COPY 1 N; O �� FF 3Z� O Or* 20000 si []�1 m m �Ul�r0 �� rn m $ `� ;i� o Pi i Cpl W !<ST§ l I. c z Q a2 d m FILE COPY 4 O rn 03 - 83M3S W2101S 0 4 • Cf.) 1..x•1 ) rj L71 w ft u• m> 9 ;1 IN in g gad R44 iR o$8 NNC f 0z N00 ma o ?2,1. i ° m V { 9g PO g 'n9 Y.2222 2» 20Y.2222 0 c 0 P1 0 2 m 0 14 AI 9 0 u 9 oA 1 2Ai2=F zr XT g Q° m2 m i tg ° g 9 2 V m 0 m D F ,$ 2 a 0 -4 1 03 NOIS02fl 8 c ��� $�sRnz g g2 g.. 6PA9140 ° °m°Yg 0 mF g14 4i! �4 5R661= opip � Nam X' 9 A 8 Q Yi Po F4 FILE .COPY E, g 12 W� .:,,, 11~I T4 4 t.iz.. °5 �� = L.,.....,-.0 o oh, `..7320 OM ZO000 dY (rnlI rnrnV1 (n O� r—rn m� D�-I Ern mD 2 I W. # a J z m i i itAl a� Yip I'• 46 s }ipfro�ro t _ v i C7 FILE .COPY ,\ 3VINNZ m| ] * 2mm= ac r c CID Cil ) { § ) / § F SON38 2l03 DNI ■ 9 m2 j 1° PROP. UNE FJLE C W SHEET NUMBER: §m j 2' ; ! A REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET •! )k* ` ) ISSUE: 08 /13/05 CITY SUVMITT.U. z » ZZX20 R� m�00U V) q� /m mQ n7q R �� m m 7 & a LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LL( ( I CONSULTANT: 2 ; § PLANNER HARTFORD EP sewnwm .. FJLE C z 71 0 0 O • < Z O r 0 z R 2 9 2 3VdS- 1131,1V88 3SN30 W 2 i 2 8 8 8 8 8 8 4' 5 4 8 En ga 9. Fm 48 22 44 a, 2 9 g 8 5 2 a 5 4 a 8 8 9 A 8 0 9 4 L. F 8 a 2 F 8 2 8 m F i b F 2 4 a 8 2 F m 2 4 F FF 9 A [`J CD Crt p! Migrffirali 95, V8A %. rq ;3 `a 1 9 F� a s! Ea 0 AA; Agg ^�b 88 Ag I� I ABU SIB, r L I it O moO o D e' 1— CO I • r O Ileq Ili Am gni ir ::\gl ( I 2 "Mil so m O1! K = °sx ��' e• g° m? Spy °n EA,,,- 1P'A' ill g 1% g42 R.. 8m€ 4 8�8 0 h8 Fad ti l$ €8 BEN g $ NVI 2F ��9�� m az �u E Nero Ni; ill zy yo'v"Qpm�m. �"doe�. ��n 5°- �$^$� ozA` -,$�v $f" TEN goA'mS�a I m1�z TQ 4i 4°�NA b"o N�m� �g� gg�y b <Ngln> £g i' b$2� a nN iQz1.n� Aga s o E$w r^gg8n g i9 gig p °z`ziuq "Al. gg£ . -00 8 `" 5> a3 m� �a �° z a � � g gN g° $ mQ >m `V S aQ s- ° 1 "'$ gg m F!! �N`m� of $ c$ sN $�i; >; °� gAm gy F� a m ; °�4 N,98 RN vZ �� ? � � '2 >2y ;F2 NN € §n z r "9 $g : !!!! � $ "_ gF ympF xg €'$8 "oo8�N 4 z gmi "� z �$�$ emu 7 ° = r$mniz '>"$ i8-.� m a >y °~ s n n o f f 2g a „D y•r=� b"m gn8. z c n !!:$! z n $n„� o ' �ions s °�"'$ �NsF ' o� $gym c'e g8! of z R$ s "$� `£ e �."> c s ?Z 1 o z: '2' -,F 1 • ° gi goff'�OB m a $ �zo g m 28 q I C4.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN l�D O ' i s� '3 55 �� e m 3 *r Zz 0 ((,'(�1 20000 0D ��rnmcn �� O���rm OD Din m rn� P LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC o z + 4 i A m 'xfq dB ¢5 $ I i. x o FILE COPY 0 ni rii m z 0 0 c m z •-4. CI iJ 'LOTTED- 09-13- D5 Flu. 03137p COW 3 MUMMEMEMM WWII= MMMMM MMEMMUMMIUMMOMMEMMEMMOMMMEMINIMMEMEM" 41111111MMEMMEMMEMEMEMMINIMUMMEM mr.r rr . Ogg! ••m• mmum mmgm040mmommommmmgmmmg gummurrag:mmgmmommmijmummimmmiummlumm immommgriminimmommmg r iiiid: ,lommordrwiammorgImmillgsgmmmlrearzwpmmomplmmommummimmugmilmomm p e A 1.......m. amine1 vmmilum Alarl...nriLtAuth uximmly. 'WM 114Ji FPQMIMMEMMINEWOMMEMEWIlmn mc, tii.r.im X g ggimm r • ii A lig5. . .... A. rd... , ti Ilimirrillrilitpirl ME WILJELMB La MUM zis Ag - 0119M-mll m, 111-1441101ClidgiTM?T.T19 7=-00J, Immigult WUNmorwisEmommol■■mmHarliiiiWumh visrilmil MIElmmi-C - i mulgarm ry 1/1 grillni mgmEngag mmg-gmmmmommmmgmlimmmgr r:mTWINNE Millm EM ME MN En •• MIA • n tr7Trsummmmmilmmommirmom Emir mimm-mmom Rm kokt Prirpoorffmm■ourood.mminumme mormimmmmwmaim1141 ZMILImr-Immormimm mum • mom r • iommommmamimiL411 1,4_ ..illigm.ff.,,A......wsmiumilmolim■milmillimm 0004immommirp,rmm mommerpornmir 1. MMEMIIMMOMMEMIlkailEEEidO M ''''' M - -ammorpmwmwrimni mernmmommm g, g. miimmommosimi_guiL.agiggi.mi. vaiimmr lurn •lmmilmm MoiliWAMMIPAPNWMENIMMEM IMMOJAMMIMUMICASAWRILIMMEm M ullt.MMNIMILIMaioWil&W•midan' "WM ft Aliffiailailmmim =Um' r:immommmmommm M4B144 GiAioNMEr' r iiiiiMEMMEN stIkwv rmmmimmr ,. ontam eUmmmom•momm .1..a omummummommaa•olommailamammialmummEmmummummmom MMEMMIIMMLW6WW1A.WAMEMMEMEMMEMEMMEMMEM mimmunmiriummmmumanamnrommoommou PY 111 W/4 m . W L Am • ..' MMU 1'.riu.. 61:11111 OMEN NAME ■iP ■ ■U ■A■ ■F1■ ■o ■II■ •M6■ MEMO MIE■■■n■W■ M■■■l MUM XV■ ■W■L■ IIIII1I1I fElalE■- ut NMEI ,: • E ■1flltl . ■l• it ■IRMIEI■i- ril■i ©!!ri■Mi i NIWW fl .ITIM11 111:11EV ■E mumble" E iam i ■■ L I i EFFFFc•iu 111111111 1/1111111 I ■rJ7Ti. ■■ ■■■ ■ ■■ ■i i ■YIMIW ■■■ ■UMMErich ■ ■■ ■OMMEUilr a■ ■■■ZIMMr.iu■ ■Pi.■I:.iI■■ ■Ky�,■N ■r.� ■II:l!■ i 117[! ■uM :M■■■ ■UI■MII.eil_CI■ 1111111111 MEMINIMMENIM EMOMIMMEMMI 111111111 • ■ ■1 ... ■ w ■ MW=1 :1 OJI aN 6416111 ■■s ■■■ MEW, im wa 1✓' \ millsimium l'J 1ST . ill YEW VAMION a [swirl■■■ ..1■■uMMEME ;:111 ■;II:. tIi■ I411. Cif■ 11 K■■ ii . f ■■ IMIN OIL■: IZ■■ E■■iLIM1■ 11113 ii '11x711' ■M■■S■■■W 1A1=1iiC FIFFJltirF n 0 - J ON 0 Iz 0 simmegm mg. mosimle0s®el Cliff d■A ■a ■e■I■i■i lie . i o lemisola•ineffirommillirf ifterarairmincom e■ I ,a 9l�llll 1 I,i I�I 1 �i.�li•IIII�� 1. 11161 11��I�1•�'.II`I�ICltil1i��,��� Cr, (11 —v I Iilill1 fr _ CD CD cn FILE COPY a .o -a = .an 'aivs • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 6D Mary Alice Divine 10/24/05 I Ordinance No. i -05: First Reading offering the sale of a parcel of and to the Chain of Lakes YMCA 3/5 On June 16, 2005 the City Council entered into a development agreement with the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, wherein the City agreed to convey the 6.72- acre parcel of land in the Legacy at Woods Edge project for the construction of a YMCA. According to the City Charter, a sale of city - owned land must be conveyed by ordinance. The ordinance will be in effect late December. The YMCA has submitted a site plan for City approval, which is scheduled for consideration at the November 9, 2005 Planning & Zoning Board meeting. The details of the financing arrangements will be brought to the City Council in December. OPTIONS: 11 1. Approve the First Reading of Ordinance No.-f11-05 2. Do not approve the Ordinance 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 10 -05 AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE OF A PARCEL OF LAND BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I. The City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") and the YMCA of Greater St. Paul ( "YMCA ") entered into a Development Agreement dated June 16, 2005 (the "Development Agreement "). The Development Agreement provided, among other things, for the conveyance, under certain terms and conditions, of certain property owned by the City described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, The Village No. 3 (the "Property "). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose, and that it is the best interest of the City to convey the Property to the YMCA subject to the terms of this ordinance and the Development Agreement. II. The city council of the City authorizes sale of the property to the YMCA, subject to any additional terms and conditions of the Development Agreement. The mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property in accordance with this ordinance and the Development Agreement. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements of the city charter. • This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter. ATTEST: Jean Viger, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • • AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -165, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract, Construction of Well No. 5 Pumphouse. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on October 18, 2005. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid EnComm Midwest, Inc. $448,844.00 Meyer $456,118.00 Rice Lake Construction Group $480,000.00 Meisinger Construction, Inc. $482,000.00 Magney Construction, Inc. $495,800.00 Lund Martin Construction, Inc. $520,000.00 Engineer's Estimate $472,000.00 The low bid is approximately 5% below the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The final completion date for this project is June 9, 2006. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 05 -165, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract to EnComm Midwest, Inc. for Construction of Well No. 5 Pumphouse. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 05 -165. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 05 -165. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05-165 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — CONSTRUCTION OF WELL NO. 5 PUMPHOUSE. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Construction of Well No. 5 Pumphouse project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid EnComm Midwest, Inc. $448,844.00 Meyer $456,118.00 Rice Lake Construction Group $480,000.00 Meisinger Construction, Inc. $482,000.00 Magney Construction, Inc. $495,800.00 Lund Martin Construction, Inc. $520,000.00 Engineer's Estimate $472,000.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Encomm Midwest, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with EnComm Midwest, Inc. in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Construction of Well No. 5 Pumphouse according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • MEISINGER MEYER RICE LAKE CONST INC. CONTRACTING CONST TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL iI 0 0 co d9 o 0 0 o 69 0 i EA GI I Y OF LINO LHKtJ, IVIINNtJU I H - - -- PROJECT NO. 13089.002 ENGINEERS - ARCI BIDS OPENED: OCTOBER 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ENCOMM LUND MARTIN ESTIMATE MIDWEST, INC CONST INC. ITEM TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 o 6. N in ER 0 0 0 0 c fA 0 0 0 0 69 ER $ 480,000.00 0! 0 o 0, 0 L6I N9 I fA 1 $ 456,118.00 0 O , Iron v I0 I ;U 1 Eft $ 448,844.00 o O co C7 o O c5 S 0 0 O O 0 0 N 0) v- 69 0 0 O 0 in to d9 0 0 0 0 in (0 Hi 1 6/9 o o 6 o 0 CV Nr to to ER d4 IBASE BID PROPOSAL Chlorination equipment by an alternate manufacturer: BASE BID PROPOSAL Chlorination equipment by an alternate manufacturer: • • • AGENDA ITEM 6F STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -166, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Payment No. 6 (Final), West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The contractor for the West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements project, Richard Knutson, Inc. is requesting City approval of Payment No. 6 (Final) in the amount of $20,400.00. A copy of the final payment is attached. The contractor has satisfactorily completed all work and has provided all necessary documentation. The current contract amount was $338,751.00 and the final contract amount is $346,114.84. Change Order No. 2 is a compensating change order which balances out the contract. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Approve Resolution 05 -166 Approving Change Order No. 2 and Payment No. 6 (Final) for the West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution 05 -166 be approved. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -166 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 AND PAYMENT NO. 6 (FINAL) FOR THE WEST SHADOW PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the construction of the West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements, including Change Order No. 2 has been completed by Richard Knutson, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Payment Number 6 (Final) in the increased amount of $15,363.84 and Change Order No. 2 (Compensating) is approved for a total contract amount of $346,114.84. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Comm. No. 12525 -01 Cert. No. 6 (FINAL) St. Paul, MN, October 4 To City of Lino Lakes. Minnesota This Certifies that Richard Knutson, Inc. For West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements Is entitled to being 6th , 20 05 Owner , Contractor Twenty Thousand Four Hundred Dollars and 00 /100 ($ 20.400.00 ) FINAL estimate for pal payment on contract with you dated August 12 , 2002 Received payment in full of above Certificate. TKDA Richard Knutson, Inc. , 20 Thomas D. Prew, P.E. RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT An Employee Owned Company ( -- "- ""irmative Act on and Equal Opportunity -156- CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 327,809.05 All previous payments $ 325,714.84 All previous credits Extra No. Change Order No. 1 $ 10,941.95 Compensating Change Order No. 2 $ 15,363.84 Liquidated Damages $ (8,000.00) Credit No. $ - AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE $ 20,400.00 Totals $ 346,114.84 $ 346,114.84 $ - Credit Balance IThere will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ - $ 346,114.84 I $ 346,114.84 $ - An Employee Owned Company ( -- "- ""irmative Act on and Equal Opportunity -156- TKDA • Engineers- Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 • • PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS FINAL Estimate No. 6 Period Ending October 4 , 20 05 Page 1 of 1 Project No. 12525 -01 Contractor Richard Knutson. Inc. Original Contract Amount $327.809.05 Project West Shadow Ponds Utility and Street Improvements Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed $ 0.00 Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 354,114.84 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 354,114.84 Less Liquidated Damages $ 8,000.00 Less Approved Credits $ 0.00 Less 0 % Retained $ 0.00 Less Previous Payments $ 325,714.84 Total Deductions $ 333,714.84 Amount Due This Estimate $ 20,400.00 Contractor Date Richard Knutson, Inc. Engineer Date October 5. 2005 Thomas D. Prew, P.E. - 1 5 7 - ESTIMATE NO. 6 (FINAL) WEST SHADOW PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS doITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA MMISSION NO. 12525 -01 PERIOD ENDING: October 4, 2005 ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE SANITARY SEWER 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EA 1.0 1.0 $ 850.00 $ 850.00 3 REMOVE 10" PVC SAN. SEW. LF 25.0 25.0 $ 20.00 $ 500.00 4 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) LF 133.0 155.0 $ 38.40 $ 5,952.00 5 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) LF 60.0 50.0 $ 38.40 $ 1,920.00 6 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (18' -20' DEEP) LF 63.0 62.0 $ 38.40 $ 2,380.80 7 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (20' -22' DEEP) LF 111.0 220.0 $ 38.40 $ 8,448.00 8 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (22' -24' DEEP) LF 593.0 658.0 $ 38.40 $ 25,267.20 9 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (24' -26' DEEP) LF 342.0 323.0 $ 38.40 $ 12,403.20 10 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (26' -28' DEEP) LF 170.0 $ 38.40 $ 11 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. SAN. MH, TYPE 301 (0' -10' DEEP) EA 6.0 6.0 $ 1,820.00 $ 10,920.00 12 EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. SAN. MH (GREATER THAN 10' DEEP) LF 80.0 70.4 $ 105.00 $ 7,392.00 13 4" ON 8" PVC, SCHEDULE 40 WYE BRANCH EA 23.0 22.0 $ 62.00 $ 1,364.00 14 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 903.0 1,114.0 $ 12.80 $ 14,259.20 SUBTOTAL - SANITARY SEWER $ 106,656.40 WATERMAIN 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN LS 1.0 1.0 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 2 6" DIP, CL. 52 WATERMAIN LF 54.0 58.0 $ 29.50 $ 1,711.00 3 12" DIP, CL. 52 WATERMAIN LF 1,434.0 1,425.0 $ 25.56 $ 36,423.00 4 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EA 3.0 3.0 $ 460.00 $ 1,380.00 5 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EA 2.0 2.0 $ 1,125.00 $ 2,250.00 0 6" HYDRANT EA 3.0 3.0 $ 1,600.00 $ 4,800.00 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 894.0 911.0 $ 10.40 $ 9,474.40 1" CORPORATION STOP EA 23.0 22.0 $ 53.00 $ 1,166.00 9 1" CURB STOP & BOX EA 23.0 22.0 $ 115.00 $ 2,530.00 10 MJ DIP FITTINGS LB 707.0 707.0 $ 2.57 $ 1,816.99 SUBTOTAL - WATERMAIN $ 61,851.39 STORM SEWER 1 15" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 622.0 615.0 $ 23.76 $ 14,612.40 2 18" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 307.0 320.0 $ 25.70 $ 8,224.00 3 21" RCP, CL. 3 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 324.0 311.0 $ 30.15 $ 9,376.65 4 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 3.0 3.0 $ 323.00 $ 969.00 5 21" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 395.00 $ 790.00 6 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN TYPE 402 EA 2.0 2.0 $ 935.00 $ 1,870.00 7 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE TYPE 406 (48" DIA.) EA 3.0 4.0 $ 1,340.00 $ 5,360.00 8 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE TYPE 406 (60" DIA.) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 2,215.00 $ 2,215.00 9 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE TYPE 409 (48" DIA.) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,095.00 $ 1,095.00 10 CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS SPILLWAY EA 2.0 2.0 $ 350.00 $ 700.00 11 CL. III RIP RAP CY 13.0 13.0 $ 60.00 $ 780.00 SUBTOTAL - STORM SEWER $ 45,992.05 STREET 1 REMOVE CURB LF 42.0 100.0 $ 5.00 $ 500.00 2 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 417.0 335.0 $ 2.25 $ 753.75 3 SAWCUT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 101.0 41.0 $ 5.00 $ 205.00 4 AGGREGATE BASE, CL. 5 TN 2,947.0 3,758.6 $ 11.25 $ 42,284.59 5 CONCRETE B618 CURB & GUTTER LF 2,922.0 2,858.0 $ 7.25 $ 20,720.50 6 2350 TYPE LV2 OR 3 NON - WEARING COURSE TN 818.0 938.58 $ 34.50 $ 32,381.01 07 2350 TYPE LV4 WEAR COURSE TN 818.0 821.4 $ 38.00 $ 31,213.20 8 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GA 335.0 410.0 $ 1.50 $ 615.00 SUBTOTAL - STREET $ 128,673.05 ESTIMATE NO. 6 (FINAL) WEST SHADOW PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS rITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA OMISSION NO. 12525 -01 PERIOD ENDING: October 4, 2005 ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1 SALVAGE 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 2 INSTALL SALVAGED 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 3 FURNISH & INSTALL 18" FLARED END SECTION & TRASH GUARD EA 1.0 1.0 $ 935.00 $ 935.00 4 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE AND CASTING EA 2.0 2.0 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,200.00 5 21" DIAMETER RCP PIPE LF 48.0 48.0 $ 50.80 $ 2,438.40 6 RIP RAP CL -III CY 5.0 5.0 $ 75.00 $ 375.00 7 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 8 BITUMINOUS TRAIL EXTRA WORK LS 1.0 1.0 $ 893.55 $ 893.55 SUBTOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 $ 10,941.95 TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 6 (FINAL) $ 354,114.84 • • • • CHANGE ORDER TKDA Engineers- Architects - Planners Compensating Saint Paul, MN October 5 20 05 Proj. No. 12525 -01 Change Order No. 2 To Richard Knutson. Inc. for West Shadow Lake Ponds Utility and Street Improvements for City of Lino Lakes. Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated August 12 , 20 02 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (decrease) (not change) the contract sum by Fifteen Thousand Three Hundred Sixty -Three Dollars and 84/100 (5 15.363.84 ). COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER This change order shows the actual quantities installed at the unit price bid amounts (see attached itemization): NET CHANGE = $ 15,363.84 Amount of Original Contract $ 327,809.05 Additions approved to date (Change Order No. 1) $ 10,941.95 Deductions approved to date (Nos. ) $ Contract amount to date 5 338,751.00 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (fie) 5 15,363.84 Revised Contract Amount $ 354,114.84 Approved City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Owner By By Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Approved Richard Knutson. Inc. White - Owner Contractor Pink - Contractor Blue - TKDA • By -160- COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 PERIOD ENDING: October 4, 20b5 WEST SHADOW PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 12525 -01 fikCONTRACT QUANTITY +/- UNIT AMOUNT NET CONTRACT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE DIFFERENCE PRICE TO DATE CHANGE AMOUNT SANITARY SEWER 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 - $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ $ 15,000.00 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EA 1.0 1.0 - $ 850.00 $ 650.00 $ $ 850.00 3 REMOVE 10" PVC SAN. SEW. LF 25.0 25.0 $ 20.00 $ 500.00 $ - $ 500.00 4 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) LF 133.0 155.0 22.0 $ 38.40 $ 5,952.00 $ 844.80 $ 5,107.20 5 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) LF 60.0 50.0 (10.0) $ 38.40 $ 1,920.00 $ (384.00) $ 2,304.00 6 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (18' -20' DEEP) LF 63.0 62.0 (1.0) $ 38.40 $ 2,380.80 $ (38.40) $ 2,419.20 7 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (20' -22' DEEP) LF 111.0 220.0 109.0 $ 38.40 $ 8,448.00 $ 4,185.60 $ 4,262.40 6 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (22' -24' DEEP) LF 593.0 658.0 65.0 $ 38.40 $ 25,267.20 $ 2,496.00 $ 22,771.20 9 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (24' -26' DEEP) LF 342.0 323.0 (19.0) 5 38.40 $ 12,403.20 $ (729.60) $ 13,132.80 10 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (26-28' DEEP) LF 170.0 (170.0) $ 38.40 $ - $ (6,528.00) $ 6,528.00 11 CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. SAN. MH, TYPE 301 (0' -10' DEEP) EA 6.0 6.0 - $ 1,820.00 $ 10,920.00 $ - $ 10,920.00 12 EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. SAN. MH (GREATER THAN 10' DEEP) LF 80.0 70.4 (9.6) $ 105.00 $ 7,392.00 $ (1,008.00) $ 8,400.00 13 4" ON 8" PVC, SCHEDULE 40 WYE BRANCH EA 23.0 22.0 (1.0) $ 62.00 $ 1,364.00 $ (62.00) $ 1,426.00 14 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 903.0 1,114.0 211.0 $ 12.80 $ 14,259.20 $ 2,700.80 $ 11,558.40 SUBTOTAL - SANITARY SEWER $ 106,656.40 $ 1,477.20 $ 105,179.20 WATERMAIN 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN LS 1.0 1.0 - $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ - $ 300.00 2 6" DIP, CL. 52 WATERMAIN LF 54.0 58.0 4.0 $ 29.50 $ 1,711.00 $ 118.00 $ 1,593.00 3 12" DIP, CL. 52 WATERMAIN LF 1,434.0 1,425.0 (9.0) $ 25.56 $ 36,423.00 $ (230.04) $ 36,653.04 4 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EA 3.0 3.0 - $ 460.00 $ 1,380.00 $ - $ 1,380.00 5 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EA 2.0 2.0 - $ 1,125.00 $ 2,250.00 $ - $ 2,250.00 6 6" HYDRANT EA 3.0 3.0 - $ 1,600.00 $ 4,800.00 $ - $ 4,800.00 7 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 894.0 911.0 17.0 $ 10.40 $ 9,474.40 $ 176.80 $ 9,297.60 8 1" CORPORATION STOP EA 23.0 22.0 (1.0) $ 53.00 $ 1,166.00 $ 9 1" CURB STOP & BOX EA 23.0 22.0 (1.0) $ 115.00 $ 2,530.00 $ (53.00) $ 1,615.00 10 MJ DIP FITTINGS LB 707.0 707.0 - $ 2.57 $ 1,816.99 $ (115 00) $ 2,816.99 SUBTOTAL - WATERMAIN $ 61,851.39 $ (103.24) $ 61,954.63 STORM SEWER 1 15" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 622.0 615.0 (7.0) $ 23.76 $ 14,612.40 $ (166.32) $ 14,778.72 2 18" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 307.0 320.0 13.0 $ 25.70 $ 8,224.00 $ 334.10 $ 7,889.90 •3 21" RCP, CL. 3 STORM SEWER PIPE LF 324.0 311.0 (13.0) 5' 30.15 $ 9,376.65 $ (391.95) $ 9,768.60 4 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 3.0 3.0 - $ 323.00 $ 969.00 $ $ 969.00 5 21" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 395.00 $ 790.00 $ $ 790.00 6 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN TYPE 402 EA 2.0 2.0 $ 935.00 $ 1,870.00 $ - $ 1,870.00 7 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE TYPE 406 (48" DIA.) EA 3.0 4.0 1.0 $ 1,340.00 $ 5,360.00 $ 1,340.00 $ 4,020.00 8 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE TYPE 406 (60" DIA.) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 2,215.00 $ 2,215.00 $ $ 2.215.00 9 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE TYPE 409 (48" DIA.) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,095.00 $ 1,095.00 $ $ 1,095,00 10 CONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS SPILLWAY EA 2.0 2.0 $ 350.00 $ 700.00 $ $ 700.00 11 CL. 10 RIP RAP CY 13.0 13.0 $ 60.00 $ 780.00 $ - $ 780.00 SUBTOTAL- STORM SEWER $ 45,992.05 $ 1,115.83 $ 44,876.22 STREET 1 REMOVE CURB LF 42.0 100.0 58.0 $ 5.00 $ 500.00 $ 290.00 $ 210.00 2 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 417.0 335.0 (82.0) $ 2.25 $ 753.75 $ (184.50) $ 938.25 3 SAWCUT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 101.0 41.0 (60.0) $ 5.00 $ 205.00 $ (300.00) $ 505.00 4 AGGREGATE BASE, CL. 5 TN 2,947.0 3,758.6 811.6 $ 11.25 $ 42,284.59 $ 9,130.84 $ 33,153.75 5 CONCRETE B618 CURB & GUTTER LF 2,922.0 2,858.0 (64.0) $ 7.25 $ 20,720.50 $ (464.00) $ 21,184.50 6 2350 TYPE LV2 OR 3 NON- WEARING COURSE TN 818.0 938.58 120.6 $ 34.50 $ 32,381.01 $ 4,160.01 $ 28,221.00 7 2350 TYPE LV4 WEAR COURSE TN 818.0 821.4 3.4 $ 38.00 $ 31,213.20 $ 129.20 $ 31,084.00 8 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GA 335.0 410.0 75.0 $ 1.50 $ 615.00 $ 112.50 $ 502.50 SUBTOTAL- STREET $ 128,673.05 $ 12,874.05 $ 115,799.00 - 161 - COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 PERIOD ENDING: October 4, 2005 WEST SHADOW PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 12525 -01 CONTRACT QUANTITY +1- UNIT AMOUNT NET CONTRACT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE DIFFERENCE PRICE TO DATE CHANGE AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1 SALVAGE 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 $ $ 300.00 2 INSTALL SALVAGED 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 2.0 2.0 $ 150.00 $ 300.00 $ $ 300.00 3 GUARD EA 1.0 1.0 $ 935.00 $ 935.00 $ $ 935.00 4 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE AND CASTING EA 2.0 2.0 $ 1,6000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ - $ 3,200.00 5 21" DIAMETER RCP PIPE LF 48.0 48.0 $ 50.80 $ 2,438.40 $ $ 2,438.40 6 RIP RAP CL-III CY 5.0 5.0 $ 75.00 $ 375.00 $ $ 375.00 7 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ $ 2,5090.00 8 BITUMINOUS TRAIL EXTRA WORK LS 1.0 1.0 $ 893.55 $ 893.55 $ $ 893.55 SUBTOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 $ 10,941.95 $ $ 10,941.95 • 110 TOTAL COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 $ 354,114.84 $ 15,363.84 $ 338,751.00 -162- • AGENDA ITEM 6G • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -167, Approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment Request No. 1R, 2005 Overlay Project. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: At the April 25, 2005 meeting, City Council awarded the 2005 Overlay Project contract to Universal Enterprises of Mid MN, Inc. The current approved contract amount is $102,710.00. Change Order No. 1 addresses the additional bituminous quantities for this project. A complete breakdown is spelled out in the attached Change Order No. 1. The construction costs are still below the Engineer's Estimate of $156,510.00. It is staff's recommendations to approve Change Order No. 1, which results in a total project cost of $124,389.36, and authorize Payment No. 1R in the amount of $11 6,704.95. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 05 -167, Approving Change Order No.1 and Payment Request No. 1R for the 2005 Overlay Project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 05 -167. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 05 -167. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -167 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1R — 2005 OVERLAY PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolutions of the Council adopted April 25, 2005, awarding the construction contract for the 2005 Overlay Project to Universal Enterprises of Mid MN, Inc., and AND WHEREAS, additional bituminous quantities were encountered, AND WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is spelled out in the Change Order No. 1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Change Order No.1 resulting in an increase of $21,679.36, bringing the contract amount to $124,389.36 and Pay Request No. 1R in the amount of $116,704.95 is approved for the 2005 Overlay Project. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Proj. No. 13329.001 Cert. No. 1R St. Paul, MN, October 17 , 20 05 To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Owner This Certifies that Universal Enterprises of Mid - Minnesota. Inc. , Contractor For 2005 Overlay Project Is entitled to One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Seven Hundred Four and 95/100 ($ 116,704.95 ) being 1st estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated April 25 2005 Received payment in full of above Certificate. TKDA Universal Enterprises of Mid - Minnesota, Inc. , 20 Thomas D. Prew, P.E. • RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity -165- CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 102,710.00 All previous payments $ - All previous credits Extra No. Change Order No. 1 $ 21,679.36 „ „ Credit No. $ - AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE $ 116,704.95 Totals $ 124,389.36 $ 116,704.95 $ - Credit Balance There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ 7,684.41 $ 124,389.36 $ 124,389.36 $ - An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity -165- TKDA • Engineers- Architects - Planners • • PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. 1R Period Ending September 27 , 20 05 Page 1 of 1 Proj. No. 13329.001 Contractor Universal Enterprises of Mid- Minnesota. Inc. Original Contract Amount $102,710.00 Project 2005 Overlay Project Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed $ 0.00 Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 122,847.32 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 122,847.32 Less Approved Credits $ 0.00 Less 5 % Retained $ 6,142.37 Less Previous Payments $ 0.00 Total Deductions $ Amount Due This Estimate Contractor Engineer Universal Enterprises of Mid - Minnesota, Inc. Thomas D. Prew, P.E. -166- Date 6,142.37 116,704.95 Date October 4, 2005 ESTIMATE NO. 1R PERIOD ENDING: September 27, 2005 2005 OVERLAY PROJECT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA iiiKDA PROJECT NO. 13329.001 M NO. DESCRIPTION CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT SANITARY SEWER UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.0C 2 ADJUST MANHOLE /CATCH BASIN FOR WEAR COURSE EA 3.0 3 ADJUST GATE VALVE FOR WEAR COURSE $ 150.00 $ _ 4 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 500.0 $ 125.00 $ 5 BITUMINOUS CURBING $ 5.00 $ 6 COMMON EXCAVATION LF 1,200.0 $ 3.00 $ 7 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CY 400.0 $ 9.75 $ 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING TN 700.0 $ 14.75 $ 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT SY 3,500.0 $ 10.50 $ _ GAL 700.0 350.0 $ 1.25 $ 437.5C 10 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE, 2350 TYPE LV 4 SUBTOTAL TN 1,180.0 906.03 $ 35.75 $ 32,390.57 $ 34,828.07 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SY 11,882.0 12,450.0 $ 0.98 $ 12,201.0C 2 GRADE GRAVEL 3 HAUL EXCESS BITUMINOUS BASE MATERIALS RS 42.0 42.0 $ 200.00 $ 8,400.0C 4 HAUL EX TN 1,480.0 1,650.86 $ 35.75 $ 59,018.25 5 BITUMINOUS CURBING LF LF 330.0 840.0 $ 10.00 $ 8,400.0C 6 COMMON EXCAVATION - $ 3.00 $ - 7 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CY $ 9.75 $ TN 8 FULL DEPTH PATCHING $ 14.75 $ SUBTOTAL SY $ 10.50 $ - $ 88,019.2E • TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 1R • $ 122,847.32 • • • CHANGE ORDER TKDA Engineers- Architects - Planners Saint Paul, MN October 4 20 05 Proj. No. 13329.001 Change Order No. 1 To Universal Enterprises of Mid - Minnesota. Inc. for 2005 Overlay Project for City of Lino Lakes. Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated April 25 , 20 05 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (dccreasc) (not change) the contract sum by Twenty -One Thousand Six Hundred Seventy -Nine Dollars and 36 /100 ($ 21.679.36 This change order provides for changes in the work of this contract according to the attached itemization. No. Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total Amount 1. Reclaim Bituminous 11,882.00 SY $ 0.98 $ 11,644.36 2. Grade Gravel 42.00 RS $ 200.00 $ 8,400.00 3. Bituminous Base 1,480.00 TN $ 35.75 $ 52,910.00 4. Haul Excess Materials 330.00 CY $ 10.00 $ 3,300.00 5. Bituminous Curbing (1,200.00) LF $ 3.00 $ (3,600.00) 6. Common Excavation (400.00) CY $ 9.75 $ (3,900.00) 7. Aggregate Base Class 5 (700.00) TN $ 14.75 $ (10,325.00) 8. Full Depth Patching (3,500.00) SY $ 10.50 $ (36,750.00) NET CHANGE = $ 21,679.36 Amount of Original Contract $ 102,710.00 Additions approved to date (Nos. ) Deductions approved to date (Nos. ) Contract amount to date $ 102,710.00 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (Nr.nnge) $ 21,679.36 Revised Contract Amount $ 124,389.36 Approved City of Lino Lakes. Minnesota TKDA Owner By By Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Approved Universal Enterprises of Mid - Minnesota, Inc. White - Owner Contractor Pink - Contractor Blue - TKDA By - 168 - • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 6H(i) Michael Grochala October 24, 2005 Resolution No. 05 -168, Adopting Assessments, Legacy at Woods Edge 3/5 Vote Required The City has commenced with the public improvements for the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Pursuant to the Petition and Waiver Agreement and Subdivision /Planned Unit Development Agreement, the property owner has waived any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of City improvements and the special assessments. The total amount to be assessed is $5,382,865. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 05 -168, Adopting Assessments for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development Project. 2. Not Adopt Resolution No. 05 -168. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 1. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -168 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WHEREAS, pursuant to the Contract for Subdivision /Planned Unit Development dated December 21, 2004 and the Petition and Waiver Agreement, dated December 20, 2004 by and between Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC (Developer) and the City of Lino Lakes, the Developer waives all rights to a hearing on the levy of special assessments for local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Legacy at Woods Edge Development, and WHEREAS, as of the date of approval of this resolution, the Developer owns all the property benefited by the subject improvements; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE PIN Lot/Block Subdivision Amount Outlot A The Village No. 3 $1,123,748 Outlot B The Village No. 3 $1,073,937 Outlot D The Village No. 3 $1,011,156 Outlot E The Village No. 3 $1,174,024 Lot 2, Block 1 The Village No. 3 $1,000,000 Total Special Assessments Levied $5,382,865 • • AGENDA ITEM 6Hii STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution Nos. 05 -169 to 05 -176, Adopting Assessments, 2005 Development Projects. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The following development projects are substantially complete, and therefore City Staff is prepared to adopt the assessments accordingly: Development Angie's Acres Foxborough Highland Meadows East 2nd Millers Crossroads 2nd Oakwood View Turnberry Crossing Vaughan Addition West Shadow Ponds 2nd Development Agreement Date June 13, 2005 August 22, 2005 March 28, 2005 March 28, 2005 July 25, 2005 March 28, 2005 April 11, 2005 April 11, 2005 In the above referenced Development Agreements, the property owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of City improvements and the special assessments. Each developer has reviewed and approved the assessments, respectively. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution Nos. 05 -169 to 05 -176, Adopting Assessments for the 2005 Development Projects. 2. Not Adopt Resolution Nos. 05 -169 to 05 -176. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 1. • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -169 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE ANGIE'S ACRES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated June 13, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Angie's Acres Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Z U w N w o� ¢ CC CC Q < w < o BLOCK UNIT ADDRESS 0 0 0 0 co co 0 co 0 Cfl 294 Elm Street r O F- O • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -170 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE FOXBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated August 22, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Foxborough Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. 111 Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • 7s- BLOCK UNIT 0 J rn w o: 0 0 -J J OC O 1— co z w w z E z N 2 = W Oaw J m Z 0 Z Z L1- LL J Q. 0) 0) O 0) 0) d) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) 0) Q1 0) 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) O) 0) (7) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Q Q Q Q Q c Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q V Q Q <t Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Oi 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) N.r: r• n ri r-r- r•r r, 1, f. r r- N. r- r: r: r N. r: r r. r: 1- r r r: r: r: r: r` r: r: 69 63 69 69 64 63 69 64 64 64 69 64 64 69 69 69 64 69 63 64 63 64 64 64 69 69 69 69 69 63 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 (D c0 CO CO (D CO CD (D (D (D (0 0 CD fD (D (0 CD CD (D CD O CD (D (D O rD (0 CD CO (D CO CD 0 (D O CO 0 of (0 on (0 of on CO (O (0 (0 (0 W (0 U) (0 co N (0 (0 CO 6 of (0 W CO m N 6 on (0 (0 w on (0 (0 co CO (0 (D CD CD CO CD CO CD CD (0 (0 CO CD CD CD CD CO CD CD CD (D CD CD CD CD (D CO CD (D CD (0 CO CO CD CD CO CD 69 63 63 69 64 69 69 69 69 69 63 63 69 69 63 63 64 64 63 69 64 63 63 69 69 69 69 64 69 64 64 69 69 63 64 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 (C) (n )0 6 (0 UP 0) 67 LL! N In (C') 6 (n 0) 6 0i ui 6) 6 (f) (n 6 UP (0 u) 6 6 (n 6 (n (0 6 UP 6 CD CO CD CD CD CD CD CO CD O CD CO CO CO CD CD CD CD CO O (0 O CD O CD CD CO CO CD CO CD (D (D (0 (O (D (D r r �n�r`r rr r r r nn�r r nfT. nrr:r_r• r:r:nr:r-. -r-. r n r-r-. 69646) 69 69 69 69 64 64 69 69 69 63 69 69 61 69 69 69 69 63 69 69 69 61 69 09 63 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 64 69 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Cf) (n (n (f) h ui Lc) (n LL) (n O U) 6 (f) N O (f1 to O Ln an 6 (n (0 (n (n (D (0 (D (D (0 (D (D u) 6 CD Cr) 0) 01 0) 0) 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) CD 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cr) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 69 69 63 69 69 69 69 63 63 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 6 9 69 69 69 63 69 69 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 M co M on co M M M on M M M on M M(0 M CO CO 0) M M M (0 CO M M 0) M(0 M M(0 0) on M M M on co co M M M M M M M 00 M M 0) 1) M CO M M CO CO CO CO CO CO M M M M M 00 M M M M (0 on on 0) M 00 on 10 on C0) M on 10 0) M 0) 0) ei r ) ID (h on on on 0) (0) (0) M M ri on M 00 on M 10 (') 0) O) 0) 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) on 0) T c' T r t r ... r r r r r . r T r . c �- � � r r r r 69 69 63 63 63 63 69 63 63 69 69 69- 63 69 69 63 69 69 69 69 63 63 63 69 69 69 69 64 64 64 69 69 69 69 63 69 69 0 0 000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o o o o o o o 0 o o 0 0 o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 (0 (0 (0m (0 (0co (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0(0(0(0 (0 co co. co co co. (0 (0 (? (e (n co CD (o (n (0 co co (0 cn (0 (0 (0 co co co ro CO. m (0 co CO. (n CO (n co co (o 69 69 69 63 64 69 69 61 64 69 63 69 69 69 63 63 69 69 69 69 69 63 63 63 69 69 69 69 64 64 69 69 64 69 69 69 63 r r r r N N N N N N N M M M M M Qct Q Q an (0 (D (D (O 0 6 (0 (n (0 (0 (D (O (O CD CO r N M Q r N M Q (C) CD r N CO V O r N CO Q L() r N M Q 6 O r(0 on r .N- r r N M -0 0'0 -0 '0 v 17 "0 17 '010 '0 0 010 CO CO CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC DC CC CC CC 1 7 1 7 '0 1 7 '0 1 7 1 7 1 7 17 1 7 'O 1 7 17 -0 1 7 1 7 0 0 0 X ) ( 0 < > 1 0 < 0< 0< 0 < 0 < 0< 0< 0< 0 < 0 < 0 < 1 < (0(00(0(0(00000000(0(0)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL CC o=CC CC CC o:II D=CC K EC IY KCC S22S22v -0vIc-0av-00•0-0-0a-0 -0 -o ox 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ox 0 0 0 0 0 tY cc CC EC CC C CC C Er CC CC rr EC CC LL LL LL LL LL LL ULL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Q(0 N CD 0 Q (0 N CD O CD N (D O Q(0 (n (n (n (n M CD r- CO CD N(0 N 0 6 Q O Q O O N N N M 01 Q Q (() O CO CD CO 0 N M Q d' (0 67 r V- (0 00 CO r r- CD r- ()•) CO (0 N M M M M M M M CO c0 CO M CO M M CO M (0 CO N (0 (0 CO CO (0 00 OD N 00 O (0 (0 CO 00 00 00 c0 oD (D CD CD (0 (0 0 CO 0 0 CD CD CD 0 CD 0 CD -176- 2 U CC CC Q W F 10 <0) o (1) O 6) S Z U • Q • M W LL M Q 64 1110 u.1 < 0) Q o • 0) BLOCK UNIT F- O - J Z 0 0) 0) CO 0) O) 0) 03001 0) 0) 0) D) 01 0) CA 0) 0) 0) 0) Q V V' V V C V Q '0' V V Tr V' C V Q Q V V 'P O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) CO O 0) 0) a) 0) 0) (7) 0) O) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O r: 0 0 0 N 0 r: r: r: r-. r: 6- r- n 6- r: r- r- 64 64 69. 64 69 64 64 64 09 64 04 04 64 64 64 64 04 64 64 69 CO CD CO O CD (O CO 6D CO 60 CO (O c0 (0 CO CO CD (D CD (O (n co co (n OD ro (ri 05 (o 05 (o m m co ao Oj ai (b (p co (O CD (O (D (0 CD CO CO CO C0 CO CD CO CO CO CO (D CD CD .= r .= .= r (0 )0 UI 61 LO r)0 (0r (0r (0r (0 T. (0 r E9 046469 64 69 09 64 64 64 0)64 09- 64 64 64 64 640964 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000 05 (0 ui (() N (� (� u') Ln (0 (0 LC1 (0 (C) (ri (0 L() iii (0 (1"i 6ri CD CD 0D CO CO CD (D CD CD 6D O CD CD CD O CD CD O CO CD .... T r T r r V- T. T f r 64 646464 64 696464 69646464 64 6404 6964646464 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 66 (() (n 66 66 )4) (1) (Li Lli L(i ui (0 ui (0 66 66 (n 66 U6 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) Cr) 0) 0) a) O) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 64 64 64 69 64 E4 69 64 64 64 64 64 04 0) 64 64 69 04 f4 co co co (0 co co no M M M M co co M M M M M M O) M M M M M e) M M M M (h M M M M M M M M M M M 4') 4') M M th M M (+) M M 4)) M M M M M M 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) a) a)i 0) Cr) a) 0) 0) 0) 0) a) 0) 0) 0) n ▪ r ......... 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 69 69 69 64 64 69- 69 69 64 69 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0(000 (O (O (O CO (0 W N (O O a0 c0 00 (O (J] c0 (O (D (O (D 'C CO (0 (D (0 (D (O (D (D (O CD (D (D (D (O (O (O 64 04 69 64 64 64 64 64 69 64 64 69 64 64 64 69 64 64 64 64 r- r- n O O O CO C9 W CO CO O 00 CO (O CO CO O 0) O) r N M r N M V u) CD r` CO 0) O r N M 7 N N ZS ICI O U al 0 0 0 0 CO (0 CO O 0 0 0 0 CD 0 a) CO X 'D "0 'O X X > a) a) a) a) a) LL CC x X 0 0 CO CO (a 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > 0 0 0 0 LL' LL 0 0 0 LL LL U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL x'aCC CC CC vv XUUUUUUUU- a -Da -a CD ) LL cc 0 0x 0 = cc L O L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cC EY CC C Qi (O LL LL LL O O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL (O 60 (O u7 M CO O M 660 CO N N N cn o L() Cr Cr cr (OD LOP) CND M M 1') Off) CD CD CO 00 CO CO O (D co (O N N CO OD W O CO CD CD (O 0 0 0 v 62,415.00 $ 100,605.00 $ 89,385.00 $ 95,760.00 $ 102,220.00 $ 69 r- un TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -171 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST 2ND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated March 28, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor N O N oUJ Cy 3 a-° 0 U m • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1.-- O O CO CO CO CO CD CD CD CO CD CO CD CD CO Cfl CD CD 00 W N. N.: N- N.. � r` N.: r•- N- r- r; N- t` r; r- n r. r: r- r- r- N- r- N- r- N. N. N- ti r- N. r- Ps Ns Ns Ns CD Q 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) OM (6 C) C)) M M C) C) C') M C) C) C') C) C') C) C) C") Cr) W rn IEA- 69 69 69^ 69 693 64 693 ER 64 64 64 64 EA 69 6. 63 69 I 69i = N. r- r- r- r- r- N- r` n r- r- r- r- r- r- r- n 0 Q = W U.— . . 4 Ni 4Ni44N. ci 44Ni co W CO CD CD CO CO CD 0 CD CO CD CD CO (D 0 CD CO. CO CD (0 � Q 0r- (1) (O 69 T Z U Z o S(ri P.F.' 5 69 69 69 64 ER 69 64 69 E9. 69 64 63 69 69 64 64 69 64 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } S o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U (0 0 Cr) (n CC) 6 627 6 6 N 6 (n LC) (n (n 6 6 U) Q W !— Q O D) (3) O) O) CT T m CTJ 0) D) O) m 0) C) O) O) O) W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 O. C. 0 0 = c r r- r �� =o r.-. mot- - .- .- c-T�- 69 693 64E9 69 69. 69 69 69 63 64 693 64 69 64 64 69 69 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 (n 6 6 (C) 6 6 6 In 6 (C) 6 (() 6 (O CD (D CO CD CO CD CO (0 (O O CO CO CO CD CO CD (0 Ns rr- TT. T.rte."TT-r~c^ -r^ -. T Ns. 69 63 693 69 64 69 69 69. 64 E9. 64 64 69 64 693 64 69 69. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q CJ 0f 0) D) 0) 0f O) 0f 0) C3) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) ai Q W r- r- r- r r- n r- h r- r- r- n Ps Ns Ns Ns n CC W Q Q CT 69 69 693 693 69 693 69. 69 69 69 69 69 ER 63 63 64 69 69 63 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V a V [t V 4 V N- V rY er `7 7 r- r- 4T V 4- 4 QQ nrsNs Ns tirsrsnrsnrsrsrsrsrsrsnrs Z W < N Q r- 69- BLOCK UNIT 69 693 69 64 64 63 E9 63 69 64 64 E469 E9.69 E9. 6464 O0 r- N Cl rl' (n (0 n O O) O r N CO 4. (4) CO n N O) rrr t =1.- rr = =rte�-c = ttc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U >, >, >, >, >, >, •• >, >• >, >, • >, >, >, >, >, >, co U U U U U CD C) U CJ C-) U U U C) U C.) U U cr) C C C C C C C C IxLu CO CO C4 CO CO CO (O CO C4 C4 CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z +„ O Q CO 0) O CD N CO V O CO N (1) to O) (0 (0 Cr) O t n CA m co O (0 r - (0 CO CD 61) 6 6 CD (0 n Cn CA N 0 0 0 0 co O co co co co O O O O co O O O o> > Q r�nnnrsr+rss rss rsrsnr�nnr�nnrsO N- CO Q Q W �O W Oz W • V) • W Zg =o • z a -179- 31,770.00 $ 19,710.00 $ CO TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -172 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE MILLER'S CROSSROADS 2ND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated March 28, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Miller's Crossroads 2nd Addition Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • J W O� F W y y BLOCK UNIT 0 O 0_ cc 0 J - N Q 0 - <C0 Z O W 0) U) Co C0 _Z a) O w 0) U W Q 1110 5 a -W+ 0 LL 2 = 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 N N N N CV N N CV N CV N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W 0 10 W W W 0 W W 10 W 0 (0 W 0 W 0 N 0 W W W W 0 0 f0 0 CD W W 0 0 W 0 W 0 (0 W 0 0 N m 0 W W W W 0 a� m m m m m m 0 m rn rn m a; m m m. a: m ai m m m m m), m m a> m 0 .) m m m rn m m m m a; m m m m m m m m m m m M 69 C7 C7 M M M M M M M C7 M O) M (7 M M M Ni M M M M M M M f9 M 0) M M 0) M vi M 0) M C) 69 0) M M 0) 0) M M M 0 Mi W W W W W W W W W 69 W W 69 W 69 64 W W W W W W W W f9 69 W W W W 69 W 69 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 49 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C R W M C O M M C O M W M C O M M O D W W W M CO O M W M CO W W M W CO W W W W CO CO W m m CO m W W CO M CO CO M W W M V V' V' V' V o V V V 7 V Ti V' V V C v 4 V V Ni 4 9• 9•! V"C V V V V Q V< c V at 4 4 4 V' V V' 4 V' V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N VV VV V V V VV V VV V V VV V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V VV V V V W 646969696969 W 496969696964696969 69 W 69646464 496969 W W 696469696969 V) 696969 69 69 69 6 674.4.44444.4.4.4. 000000000800008000 0, 00000.000.000000000000000000000000.000 00000000000000000002.000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cfl N W ui N h N 4) ui N ui to N to N t0 K) to h 6 6 ui N W ui ui ui to N 4) to M) to ui t0 W 1C W 6 6 to to W 6 N ui 6 ui ui to 0h: �nfr°_NINs.N: N nnnnnlfOnnnNInrW_nnn N: N: NININIn N.. NI rn°� ^NI ^n�N6 69 6964 W 690. W 6969 W W W W W W 64 64 6969 W W W W 6964 W 6969 W 69.69 W W W W W W W W W W W W W r9 W W W W W 0000,00,00, 0 0 0 000 0 000 00,0 OOO, ooOOOOOOO gO0O000000O00000000,00,0O,o0 00000 0o00,0oo$go000000000o0OO000oo ui t[) 8C) 8) 8>) 4) W t[) ui 11) O ui W LL) 4) to ui 4) ui ui 4C) tf) tf) 6 41 4') tt) to N to LL') 8) 8>) U) Y) to >) N to ui 1C) tf) to ui 4) tC) try to 4) 47 00000000000000000000000000000000000000300000003003 4444444.44444.444.444.4.444.4.4.4.4.44444.4.4.444.4.4. W W f9 N V! W 69. C9 6969.6669 W W W W W 69 6969 W W W 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 A A AA n n A n n r n A n r AA A A n A A AA n r A n r AA A A h n r n A n n A AA AA n AA r AA Qi m 0)0)69 0) a) a) m 0)0) O) Oi m O) 0 O)Oia)0) 0) a) 0> 0) tT m 0)0)0) m a)0) 0)0)0i O)O) 0> O) O) ai 0) 0) A a) a) Cri m a) V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V a V• V V V V M V V V V V V V V V V V M V V' m V V M M V V V a 0 P) f') M M P) C) M C`) C) M C') C`) 1') M M C) M C+) M M M M C') 1') M M 0) 0) M C) M M M M M C) M P) M M C) M M M C) C`) M P) M W 4.44444.4.4.4.4.444.4.49444.4.4.4.4.4.4969444.44 6969 69.49 49.69. 69.69. W 69 69 W W 69 69 49 49 W W W W W W W W f9 W W W W W W W 000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W CO CO 0 CO 0 W W r- 0 t0 t0 CO W f0 CO CO W CO (O CO W CO t0 CO !0 W C0 C0 fO CO CO r- CO CO W f0 0 t0 W CO W CO CD o. W m f0 t0 NZ N.: NZ NZ I: NZ r; r: 09 � r` 0- r` 89 r` r: NZ n NZ r4 N 1904 t: NZ NZ t:^ (404(9 r r` r` n n t` n r: r r4 n 09 r; n NZ NZ NZ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M Cry M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M.M M M M M 64 64 W 69 W W W 69 64 69 69 W W W W W W W W W W 69 W 69 W W W W 64 69 69 69 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 W 69 W 64 64 W W W W W 64 8989 NN N N N N M M M M M M M M V V V V V V V V >4)14)8>) t0 tf) N 4) to C0 t0 r` r CO W W m m m N M V tO W r W 6- N M V tf) (0 6-. W,- N M V tf) t0 r W I- N M V t0 W t` C0 .- N M V M O r W '- N N '- N M '- N M L L t L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L t L L t L L L L L L L L L .0 L F�F- )- F- F- F- F- F- F- NI• -r-I- - I-aaaa CL aaa aaa a as a a a a a as "aaaaaaaaaaaaa CO t0 f0 W to W CO f0 CO f0 CO CO CO tO A CO 9. T T t t T ?. >+ T a A a > T ?. T T T T T >. J+ T ?. CTO f0 N t0 tG (00 100 W W t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o m m m Co m tv m m to to 0 to to tv (0 m m m m ra Ca ; ; ;; ; 3 3 3; Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 l 3 3 0; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 a a a a a a a a a a m to Co m m to tc m to 00 to m m CO -1 taaa_ a_ a_ a_ aa_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a_ a _a_a_a_a_a_a_o_a_a_._a_:-:�:-:- m V N O m o N V N o W 0 v m W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N to 4) W 4) C0 W CO n ti W C0 n n ti W N M 0) r- m M m h W M to n 0) tr O M m M O 0� 0 CN0 m r 0 0 1( C() CVO CVO CVO CVO m CVO W CVO (VO 0 100 00 C00 (VD 0 0 M M M C9' ') CO) M M M C69. ) rW) 1010 M M M P) M M M M M M C9 M 0 CVO 0 0 >04.4.1010(0 - 181 - m 21,240.00 $ W 0 N W 17,485.00 $ 54,750.00 $ W 0 0W) TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -173 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE OAKWOOD VIEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated July 25, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Oakwood View Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • F- 00000000000 0 Z V V V V V V V O V V 'Er O (n co Q) O) 0) (n 0) 6C) 6) (n 0) 0) J W 6D (C) 6C) 6C) (D 6a IC In 6(] LO 6n V < = c0 co co co co co co No O co co 0) O 0) la 6C) 10 10 10 6 co- 10 6C) 6n (O F- W n (n (n Q EA 69 64 6 - 63 69 63 63 63 64 64 000000 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 o vvvvvvv(ovvv U F- co 10 ODCO 10(nCO NOOCOOD W2 CO CO CO CO CO CO CONIco co co ¢ C1 (n 64 69 69 6- 69 64 69 64 EA- EA 63 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 ; ri ui 6ri (ri «i (ri 6ri o (ri 6 (ri CD �— (D CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO W i r r F- 6969 EA 63 63 63 69 64 69.646- 00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 o 10 6ri 10 O) 0) a) O) 0) a) 0) 0) 0) D) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. r o O. O r r r r r r r N r r r d? EA EA EA 63 EA 63 EA E9 64- E9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N O N N (V 000)0)0)00)00)0)0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 W r r r r r r r V r r r 69 EA 63 63 63 69 63 69636969 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >- N N N N N N N O N N W. M M M O M M M N N N N N N N O N N W w O o 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 O O Z W� V r r r < (n CE) BLOCK UNIT 12,566.00 $ 21,180.00 $ 13,140.00 $ 14,541.00 $ 15,522.00 $ 69 64 63 69 63 EA 6363 EA 6364 63 N r r r N N N F- O rNM V 10 CO n Qtr NM 0) co Q) N 4) N (0 0 O) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J CO J CD CO J J J J J J -0 '0 0 0 0 'D O '0.5 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 3 Y Y Y Y Y< Y Y Y (D CO CO N CO N CO Lcj (0 @ @ 0000000{000 0) CO CO CO On (D 6r) 6n n OD 0) 0 000000009000 (O < CO (D CO (O (D (D CO (D O J J o: F- O N w z w w Z 2 0) W Z (n _ W �dj °og Z <Z Z u_ O 111 d N TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -174 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE TURNBERRY CROSSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated March 28, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Turnberry Crossing Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk - 184 - John J. Bergeson, Mayor • Z J W Q CO • W CO BLOCK UNIT H 0 J upCC CO C4 CO CO CO CO C4 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO L11 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 =7 IQ Q Q Cr Cr Cr Q Q Q Q Cr Cr Q Q Q Cr Cr Q Q Q Q Q Q o C) 0 4- co 0) n co O N CO N CO n Cr) r 0 N CD CO 6) n co co co co N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 Q 4- mr '7 <t V R 4- V I 'W 4- 4- mr V mr V 4- 'cr 'R C V -t C O ✓ v v v Cr v Cr Cr v Cr v Cr Cr v v v v v mr v mr v 0 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) O) O) Cr) 0) O) CA 0) 0) C)) O) 0) 0) D) CD 0) 0) m CO rt T7 Tr 7 mr ct �' .:11. mr d' c '7 mr V' 4- -4 4- ,r '7 -4- N O 64 ER ER 69 ER E9 64 64 69. 69 64 V3 69 E9 69 E9 69 69 69 6R 64 ER 69 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000 co M co co co co co M co co Cr) CO Cr) CO CO Cr) M Cr) Cr) M M CO Cr) C7 C'7 M M ri C'h C`7 ri C''i f`M M r7 n r- r n n n n r- n n r- n n n n n n n n n n n n 69 64 69 69 69 E9 E9 E9 64 69 E9 E9 69 64 64 E9 69 E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 69 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00000000000000000000000 N 0) 0i tri 0) in 0) tri Lri tr) In 0) tri lri tri tri Lr) t() Lci 0i LEO tri LC) CD CD CD CD CO CD CD CD CD CD (D CD CD CD CD CD CD O CD CD CD CO CD 64 64 69 69 64 69 69 ER 64 64 ER 64 69 64 69- 69 69 64 69 69 69 E4 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo LC) tri tri Lr) LC) tri LC) t!"i 1) t() 0) (0 tri 0) tri tri 0C) lt) t!'i to tri tri CA CT CT O) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) D) 0) D) CD Q) 0) C) O) 0) 0) 0) C)) O) 0) O O o 0 0 0 O. O. 0 O 0 O. 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 CD 0 O. 0 64 E9646969 E9 E9696469 ER 69646464 6'3 E96969. 69 E9 ER Eft 00000000000000000000000 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n C`') M M Cr; Cr.) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n E4 64 E9 64 69 69. E9 ER 69 69 E9 ER 64 69 69. 69 E9 ER E9 E9 E/9 64 69 N. n n n n n n n n n n r- n n n n n n n n n n Ci C'i C ) r') C) M C ) C) CT) r) C) C�) Ch C ) C') C'') Ci C) ri C) C'7 C6 Ci Tr Ct . v er v v mr Cr v v v c v v c 'r Cr yr V yr V V v v v v v v v v v Cr Cr v Cr cr v v v v v v v E9 64 69 FR 69 64 ER ER E9 69 ER 64 E9 ER E9 E9 ER 69 6R 69 64 E9 E9 <- N Cr) to O n m O O '- N M ct 0) CD n CO CA O N C) V N N N N N CU CU tU CU N CU CU U 0 N CU 0 CU CU CU N N CU CU CU d CU CU ` U U U U L "` U" 0 0 0` U` U U U UUUUUUUC)UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU J J 0 CD Z0 H 5 U) Z 0 Z 2 Z y w } vi to W Y < w< 41) J Z Z LL J Q -185- 16,406.00 $ 40,595.00 $ 25,185.00 $ 10,895.00 $ ER 0 0 CV 0 0 69 N TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -175 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE VAUGHAN ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated April 11, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the Vaughan Addition Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1- 0 0 0 0 0 Z N N N N N ▪ W N N N N N < 2 CO CO CO f) CO Oco- CD 6 CD CO W CO CO • 69 69 69 69 69 T 00000 U CD CO CD CD CD W Q �tir`r;r` • W~ W N CD CO N N N LaL H o r c- e- e- IX Q ° CD e- 0) N 69 69 69 69 693 69 WATERMAIN = 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 W N N N N_ • p a V R V V Z o r NT = — - 69 69 69 69 69 1 o 0 0 o 0 >- v o 0 0 0 0 CC fY Q 6 6 6 6 6 Q W F- N- N- r N. r- W N O OD 0 0 Z W0 O Q < CO (C) 0 WATERMAIN } Q 6 O 0 67 6 Q W a v v v a F � Lai < 0)QOv U) c+) 69 64 69 69 69 69 = 0 0 0 0 0 x0 0 0 0 0 < W F) M W O ? ?��t Q 69 69) 69 Efl 69 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BLOCK UNIT 7,060.00 $ 4,380.00 $ 69 0 0 64 0 0 0 69 E9 693 693 69 ( 64 1.0 O J N N C7 •t (0 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -176 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE WEST SHADOW PONDS 2ND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to the development agreement dated April 11, 2005, the developer waives all rights to a hearing on the conducting of local improvements which will benefit the properties within the West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition Development, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL z 0 ❑ ❑ Z N Q CO I- 0 Z W d Z Z 0. ❑ cr) < W co 0 2 Y cn � J W z z J W Q CO 0 CO W W W Q W 2 o cn fX < — 64 SANITARY SANITARY SANITARY J W W CC O I— W � CD J N 64 LLIL Q LU W W Q cn.J WATERMAIN W 0 co 0 c) ER WATERMAIN W� CC a0 64 LOT BLOCK UNIT 0 0 N _N a. CD CO N N N Ili r N ER 69 69 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 CA V. <II CA r nj 64 64 0 0 0 0 O O O CD n n N N 6469 0 0 0 0 LD 13 Co CD to c*i rri O 0 0 O Lei 1.6 co co 69 64 0 0 0 0 0i 0 0 00 3,530.00 $ 7,130.00 $ 5,520.00 $ 2,190.00 $ 64 64 69 0 0 0 16 C7) O Cr) 0 Cr) 64 64 V3 0 0 0 LC) LC) o N N CC) M M CA C7) CO E.S. 69 64 r r N r N z Cl TOTAL ASSESSMENTS • • • AGENDA ITEM 6Hiii STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 24, 2005 TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -177, Adopting Assessments, Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: City Staff has received requests from several property owners to connect to city utilities. Each resident has submitted a signed waiver, which waives their rights to a hearing and waives their rights to appeal under the Lino Lake City Charter and /or Minnesota Statute 429 provided that the assessment associated with the improvement is levied against their property. We are prepared to adopt the assessments for the following individual properties, which requested connection to city utilities: 7870 Country Lane 599 62nd Street 702 Main Street 7988 Nancy Drive 6776 Lake Drive 432 Lilac Street 485 Birch Street 7774 Lake Drive 52 Elm Street 60 Elm Street 600 Marshan Lane 590 Marshan Lane OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 05 -177, Adopting Assessments for Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities. 2. Not Adopt Resolution No. 05 -177. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 1. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05-177 RESOLUTION ADOPTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, INDIVIDUAL UTILITY CONNECTIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to the waiver received by individual property owners to waive all rights to a hearing on the conducting of a local improvement which will benefit the Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of and therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2006, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is by November 24, 2005; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December- 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 11 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of October, 2005. Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • Z 0 Clo o 0 Cf) V N N O O Q m r, N M r V C in LC) F_cn OrnrOrCOMMM DLD OM += ^CriOivRDiv - N:Lriiri F W N ,CJ Cn (n Q 696969-6969-69696969 63 63 6T 0 c ' 0 000•7 a u] O O 4") v n <1115 O 000 O COO O N F>- � N N 69 6449 69696369 6} 6J 636963 15,850.57 $ 225,877.30 63 X W W O w<O coxO wW • H O _1Z w Q 63 636363646366 6369 636349 63 w z U` mu-0 LL iiiiiii 1111 696969644969-6,96969696969 Z CD 000010 000000 W 4, o 0 0 o CD Ci o Lr) CC; 0 0 Q 3-0 00 CO CZ 000 .= r, 00 22‹ (D V V' O C M a 0 M. M Cn (0 CA CD CO CD CO CT CO MOO' CO n r W h o n N r CD ,4 n r N CO CD O CD >Q LL O 1. • w < Z Q z 0 O <LLO 6464690-6969696969696.969 000 000000 01.00 O N O O M 0 0 0 o O O CCi CC) O o 0vm °OOm°oonn n M N f7i n N M 4(j 137 636363636363 63 63 63 64 66 b9 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O °0000o 0 O O ▪ 666661666.'66 5F- CO(CDCDCD(0 (0 ere- n t` n 0 n co. N CD o WS rrrrr;rr.- r.r 6969-69696969696969-696969 )- 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 fY0C 666 ' oSriwiLli ' ' 66 Qwh 0)0)0 mo m 3- 000 (0000 00 zw0 v.=rr rr am 63 6363636363636463 636363 w W Z 000,-00L00 00 w Zr- .7.1. h V CD R) O CO n M 00. N n N r ',Si r M N V V 1 mw NMnnDNNO NN F a' W CO N CO (D M m CD 00 n n O W= r M N r F- za O 63636363 fR69 63 63 64 6d 6363 0 OO 0,7000~ N 0' 00 Z Xx 00)0 ' 0cri)ria ' ' (0Co O <w‹ M CO CO {D) CO CO nn F, 3-L CDr( C0000 COO w Z (0 Z 64 69 69 64 64 64 69 63 63 63 6969 0 U f- w Z rrrrrrr<-rrr w 0 I- M W 0 W m a) O CC 215154.1"-z? c c 2 a) J J J ,, y w n a) N' -J ?0 Cn C Cn v� t w ro 6> w 2 d m m > w U N f0ZJ N V 165th N N CG CO Z W Q = 0 0 2 m o m E E 0 0 w� 0 H D 0 nW 0 0 M N- CCO M N O o M III cLw Q nu0nnmvvn�ncDCD)n W z aw O) CD N O N 10 Cr) N CO n N O) = O 0 M 0 0 M N Q a 0 0 000000000 0 000090000000 Jw v ^r•= Z Y N r N M C ry N Q N N CV N N CV CV LL • 7 r N N N N N N N N N O w z Z M M M M m M M m M m M M N '-1 d 0 CO O 0 M N O 12,900.00 $ 22,570.00 $ 79,991.42 $ 69,307.39 $ 11,895.00 $ 13,362.92 $ 63