HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/14/2005 Council Packet•
•
•
AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
November 14, 2005
Council Chambers
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
6:00 p.m.
MUNICIPAL CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
6:30 p.m.
City Council Meeting
Immediately following Canvassing Board Meeting
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
Open Mike
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) November 14, 2005 (Check No. 75220 through 75375 in the
amount of $1,109,315.99). pg. 4 -20
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14940 through 14953 in the
amount of $153,143.87). pg. 21
B) Consider Approving Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Centennial
Middle School PTA pg. 22
C) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes
D) Consider October 13, 2005 Special Council Work Session w/ Charter
Commission
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None
Page 1
•
•
•
AGENDA
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -180, Extending the Joint powers
Agreement for the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization
Until January 1, 2007 pg. 23 -24
B) Donated Sick Leave Policy (to follow) pg. 25
C) First Reading of Ordinance No. 12 -05, Establishing 2006 Fee Schedule
pg. 26 -33
D) Consider Conditional Offer of Employment for City Clerk (to follow)
pg. 34
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) None
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A) None
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -153, Approving Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Village of Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser pg. 35 -62
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -178 Approving the Assignment and
Release of Obligations Under the Contract for Private Development,
Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 63 -65
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving the Release of
Obligations under the Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit
Development, Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 66 -73
Second Reading, Ordinance No. 11 -05 Offering the Sale of a Parcel of
Land to the YMCA, Mary Divine pg. 74 -76
7. Unfinished Business
A) None.
8. New Business
A) Consider October 19, 2005 Council Work Session Minutes (Council
Member Dahl Absent)
Page 2
•
•
AGENDA
B) Consider October 24, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes (Council
Member Stoltz Absent)
9. Community Calendar, November 15, 2005 through November 28, 2005:
A) Council Work Session, Tuesday, November 22, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
B) Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 24, 2005, City Hall Closed
C) City Hall Closed, Friday, November 25, 2005
D) Special Council Work Session, Monday, November 28, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
E) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 28, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
Page 3
AMENDED AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
November 14, 2005
Council Chambers
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
6:00 p.m.
MUNICIPAL CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
6:30 p.m.
City Council Meeting
Immediately following Canvassing Board Meeting
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
- Open Mike
- Call to Order and Roll Call
- Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) November 14, 2005 (Check No. 75220 through 75375 in the
amount of $1,109,315.99). pg. 4 -20
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14940 through 14953 in the
amount of $153,143.87). pg. 21
B) Consider Approving Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Centennial
Middle School PTA pg. 22
C) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes
D) Consider October 13, 2005 Special Council Work Session w/ Charter
Commission
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None
Page 1
AMENDED AGENDA
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -180, Extending the Joint powers
Agreement for the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization
Until January 1, 2007 pg. 23 -24
B) Donated Sick Leave Policy pg. 25
C) First Reading of Ordinance No. 12 -05, Establishing 2006 Fee Schedule
pg. 26 -33
D) Consider Conditional Offer of Employment for City Clerk
pg. 34
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) None
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A) None
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -153, Approving Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Village of Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser pg. 35 -62
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -178 Approving the Assignment and
Release of Obligations Under the Contract for Private Development,
Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 63 -65
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving the Release of
Obligations under the Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit
Development, Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 66 -73
D) Second Reading, Ordinance No. 11 -05 Offering the Sale of a Parcel of
Land to the YMCA, Mary Divine pg. 74 -76
7. Unfinished Business
A) None.
8. New Business
A) Consider October 19, 2005 Council Work Session Minutes (Council
Member Dahl Absent)
Page 2
AMENDED AGENDA
B) Consider October 24, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes (Council
Member Stoltz Absent)
9. Community Calendar, November 15, 2005 through November 28, 2005:
A) Council Work Session, Tuesday, November 22, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
B) Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 24, 2005, City Hall Closed
C) City Hall Closed, Friday, November 25, 2005
D) Special Council Work Session, Monday, November 28, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
E) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 28, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
Page 3
SUMMARY MINUTES
(Formerly Expanded Agenda)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
November 14, 2005
Council Chambers
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
6:00 p.m.
MUNICIPAL CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
6:30 p.m. (6:31 P.M.)
JEAN VIGER PRESENTED A WRITTEN MUNICIPAL CANVASS REPORT TO
THE MUNICIPAL CANVASS BOARD (CITY COUNCIL) COUNCIL MEMBER
REINERT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MUNICIPAL CANVASS BOARD
REPORT. COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ MOVED TO AJOURN AT 6:35 P.M. COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT SECONDED THE MOTION. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
City Council Meeting
Immediately following Canvassing Board Meeting
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
Open Mike — NO ONE WHO WISHED TO SPEAK
Call to Order and Roll Call (6:35 P.M. — ALL PRESENT))
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items- AGENDA ITEM 1C
MOVED TO NEW BUSINESS (8C) & AGENDA ITEM 6A REMOVED
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) November 14, 2005 (Check No. 75220 through 75375 in the
amount of $1,109,315.99). pg. 4 -20
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14940 through 14953 in the
amount of $153,143.87). pg. 21
B) Consider Approving Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Centennial
Middle School PTA pg. 22
C) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes
Page 1
SUMMARY MINUTES
(Formerly Expanded Agenda)
D) Consider October 13, 2005 Special Council Work Session w/ Charter
Commission
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER STOLTZ FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
lAi, lAii, 1B & 1D. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -180, Extending the Joint powers
Agreement for the Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization
Until January 1, 2007 pg. 23 -24
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL TO EXTEND THE JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR THE VLAWMO UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2007. PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
B Donated Sick Leave Policy pg. 25
C) First Reading of Ordinance No. 12 -05, Establishing 2006 Fee Schedule
pg. 26 -33
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY CARLSON.
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
D) Consider Conditional Offer of Employment for City Clerk
pg. 34
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY REINERT
TO OFFER EMPLOYMENT TO JULIANNE BARTELL. PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) None
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A) None
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
Page 2
SUMMARY MINUTES
(Formerly Expanded Agenda)
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -153, Approving Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Village of Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser pg. 35 -62
REMOVED FROM AGENDA
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -178 Approving the Assignment and
Release of Obligations Under the Contract for Private Development,
Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 63 -65
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving the Release of
Obligations under the Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit
Development, Hartford Group, Inc., Mary Divine pg. 66 -73
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
D) Second Reading, Ordinance No. 11 -05 Offering the Sale of a Parcel of
Land to the YMCA, Mary Divine pg. 74 -76
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. Unfinished Business
A) None.
8. New Business
A) Consider October 19, 2005 Council Work Session Minutes (Council
Member Dahl Absent)
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY WITH COUNCIL
MEMBER DAHL ABSTAINING.
B) Consider October 24, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes (Council
Member Stoltz Absent)
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY WITH COUNCIL
MEMBER STOLTZ ABSTAINING.
C) Consider September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Minutes
Page 3
SUMMARY MINUTES
(Formerly Expanded Agenda)
MOVED TO NEXT WORK SESSION (NOVEMBER 23, 2005)
9. Community Calendar, November 15, 2005 through November 28, 2005:
A) Council Work Session, Tuesday, November 22, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
B) Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 24, 2005, City Hall Closed
C) City Hall Closed, Friday, November 25, 2005
D) Special Council Work Session, Monday, November 28, 2005, 5:30 p.m.
E) City Council Meeting, Monday, November 28, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
MEETING AJOURNED AT 7:17 P.M.
Page 4
•
AGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY
NOVEMBER 14, 2005
6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of September 13, 2005
3. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -03 Approving the Assignment and Release of
Certain Obligations under the Contract for Private Development with Hartford
Development, Inc.
4. Adjourn
•
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
W22
3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
DATE
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
OTHERS PRESENT
Draft
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES
: September 13, 2005
: J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. Reinert, D. Stoltz
: None
: Mary Divine, Gordon Heitke, Steve Bubul
Meeting called to order by President Reinert at 6:20 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 28, 2005
EDA Member Bergeson moved to approve the February 28, 2005 minutes, as presented. EDA
Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 05 -02 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE
CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CITY AND HARTFORD
DEVELOPMENT,INC.
Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating that Staff is recommending approval. This item
was discussed in detail during the city council work session, held just prior to the EDA meeting.
EDA Member Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -02 approving the amendment to the contract
for private development between the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority and Hartford
Development. EDA Member Bergeson seconded the motion.
Motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, EDA Member Carlson moved to adjourn. EDA Member Stoltz
seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
Transcribed by:
Karen Bucklen
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 011/14/05
TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -03 Approving the Assignment and
Release of Certain Obligations under the Contract for
Private Development with Hartford Development, Inc.
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The Economic Development Authority entered into a Contract for Private
Development with the Hartford Group on December 20, 2004, (amended on
September 13, 2005) setting forth the terms and conditions of redevelopment for
Legacy at Woods Edge.
The Contract acknowledges that Hartford Group plans to sell certain portions of
the development property to subdevelopers, and requires that any proposed
subdeveloper assume all the obligations of the developer for the portion of the
property being transferred. The subdeveloper must agree to be subject to all the
conditions and restrictions of the Contract, including the construction of minimum
improvements on the site.
This EDA action releases the Hartford Group from the conditions that will be
assumed by the subdeveloper (GC! Builders, Inc.) for the Country Inn & Suites
site. This release will be delivered upon approval of the site development
agreement with the Country Inn & Suites developer.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 05 -03 Approving the Assignment and Release of
Certain Obligations for the Country Inn & Suites site under the contract
with Hartford Group.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 05 -03
3. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
•
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 05-03
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE OF CERTAIN
OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the Lino Lakes Economic
Development Authority ( "Authority ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority currently administers Development District No. 1 (the "Project)"
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 ( "Development District Act ").
1.02. The Authority, the City of Lino Lakes ( "City ") and Hartford Development, Inc. (the
"Developer ") entered into a into a Contract for Private Development dated December 20, 2004, as
amended by a First Amendment thereto dated September 13, 2005 (the "Contract "), setting forth the
terms and conditions of redevelopment of certain property within the Project, referred to generally
as the Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.03. The Developer and Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC (the "Development Property Owner ")
have determined need to assign certain obligations under the Contract to CGI Builders, Inc. (the
"Successor Developer ").
1.04. The Authority has reviewed an Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations
under Contract for Private Development, County Inn & Suites Hotel, between the Authority, the
City, the Developer and the Successor Developer (the "Assignment "), and finds that the execution
thereof is in the best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. Authority Approval: Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Assignment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject
to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the
President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall
be conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of
the Authority the Assignment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the
Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority its obligations thereunder.
SJB- 267750v1
LN 140 -80
e Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Lino Lakes Economic Development
Authority this 14th of November, 2005.
•
•
ATTEST:
Secretary
SJB- 267750v1
LN 140 -80
2
President
•
APPROVAL OF ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE
OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
COUNTRY INN & SUITES HOTEL
I. Recital.
1.1 The Effective Date of this Agreement is , 2005.
1.2 The Parties to this Agreement are the LINO LAKES ECONOMIC
• DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of
Minnesota (the "Authority "), the CITY OF LINO LAKES, a Minnesota municipal corporation
(the "City ") and HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Master
Developer ") and CGI BUILDERS, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Successor Developer ").
1.3 The Authority, City and Master Developer are parties to a Contract for Private
Development dated December 20, 2004, recorded December 29, 2004, as Document No.
1971748.006, in the Office of the Anoka County Recorder, as amended by a First Amendment
thereto dated September 13, 2005 (the "Contract ").
1.4 Various real estate parcels are subject to the Contract and Successor Developer
has entered into an agreement with Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, an affiliate of Master Developer,
to purchase one of the parcels subject to the Contract for the purpose of developing a hotel (the
"Hotel Development "). Such parcel is legally described as:
Lot 4, Block 1, The Village No. 4, Anoka County, Minnesota
(the "Subject Parcel ")
1.5 In connection with the sale of the Subject Parcel, Master Developer has requested
approval of an assignment of and a release from the terms and conditions of the Contract as to
the Subject Parcel pursuant to Article VIII of the Contract.
1.6 Master Developer desires to assign, and Successor Developer desires to assume
• Master Developer's rights and obligations under the Contract with respect to the transferred Parcel.
1
•
•
•
1.7 City has approved the Subject Parcel for use consistent with the proposed Hotel
Development. On that basis, City and Authority are willing to approve an assignment of the
Contract to Successor Developer and release Master Developer from the terms and conditions of
the Contract subject to the terms and conditions of this assignment.
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
II. Agreement.
2.1 Master Developer hereby assigns, and Successor Developer hereby expressly
assumes all of the rights and obligations of Master Developer under the Contract with respect to
construction of hotel on the Subject Parcel with a minimum market value of $3,750,000 (the "Hotel
Improvements ").
2.2 The parties hereto agree and understand that the Hotel Improvements constitute a
portion of the Commercial Component of the Minimum Improvements under the Contract.
2.3 The Authority and the City hereby consent to and approve the assignment in
sections 2.1 and 2.2 above.
2.2 From and after the effective date set forth above, Master Developer is released
from its obligations under the Contract as to the Subject Parcel and as to the portion of the
Commercial Component represented by the Hotel Improvements, subject to the following:
(a) Master Developer remains liable under the Contract as to all other parcels
subject to the Contract that are not released hereby or previously released, and as to all
other provisions of the Contract.
(b) Successor Developer agrees and understands that the Subject Parcel is
subject to the Assessment Agreement between the Authority and Developer dated
, 2005 ( "Assessment Agreement "), setting a minimum market value for the
Subject Parcel and the Hotel Improvements constructed thereon for the period described
in the Assessment Agreement.
(c) Satisfactory completion by Successor Developer of the Hotel
Improvements will be considered satisfaction of Developer's obligations as to a portion
of the market value of Commercial Component under Section 4.3 of the Contract, such
portion being the minimum value of $3,750,000 or the actual value upon completion,
whichever is greater. However, nothing in this agreement will relieve Developer of its
obligation to construct the remainder of the Commercial Component in accordance with
the Contract. •
2
•
•
•
This document drafted by:
Hartford Group, Inc. (FAJ)
1300 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Ave. S.
Bloomington, MN 55431
(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
3
• Dated: , 2005 LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic
under the laws of Minnesota
•
•
By
Its President
By
Its Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2005 by
and , the President and Executive Director of the Lino Lakes
Economic Development Authority, on behalf of the Authority.
[Separate Signature Page to Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations Under Contract
For Private Development]
4
• Dated: , 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
•
By:
Its: Mayor
By:
Its: City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2005, by , the and , the
of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota on behalf of said City.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations Under Contract
For Private Development]
1787796v2
7/7/05
5
• Dated: , 2005 HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
•
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
The foregoing
Hartford Development,
By:
Keith Gruebele
Its: Chief Financial Manager
) ss
instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2005, by , the of
Inc, a Minnesota Corporation on behalf of said Corporation.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations Under Contract
For Private Development]
6
•
•
Dated: , 2005 GCI BUILDERS, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
) ss
By:
Its:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2005,
by , the of GCI Builders, Inc, a Minnesota
corporation on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations Under Contract
For Private Development]
7
AGENDA ITEM
STAFF ORIGNINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE: November 14, 2005
TOPIC: Canvass Municipal Election
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
BACKGROUND:
Attached you will find the returns of the Lino Lakes Municipal Election. Minnesota
Statute 205.185 subd. 3 states that the governing body of a city conducting any election
shall canvass the returns and declare the results of the election within seven days.
OPTIONS:
1. Move to accept the municipal canvass board report
2. Reject the report
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
p-
z
0
I-
()
w
J
w w O
Q Q N
zzw
-J = m
Ou-w
i 0
VcZ
a
5
2
m
co
J
i-
0
i-
in
L
a
M
qt
L
a
N
i
a
M 1.0 N N Co M M 00 N 1.0 C N- L T (0 M M M ` ` o ti N o T o N CD T Lf) o N c- O 'C co N N T T T
T T
0) 00 0
N M
I` CO ti N-
T T-
N- ao
Lo
T T
o Ln
co Lo
T T V-
T T
# of Reg. Persons at 7 a.m.
C
0
0
C
1:
a)
)
.5)
a)
fr
c c3
O Q
L
a) O
c
0..
0
O a)
L1J
Total # of Reg. Voters
OFFICE OF MAYOR
o Lf) o 00 T ti CO o
N.- N I- T T CO T
CD N I` I` 1.0 T N T
CD N LC)
O T
CO N-
T
OM) N
N CD
T
ti M
OD N T-
N
�co
Co co
d' 00 r
N- Co cD LC) o
'- M T T co
N- M Lf) d- .4-
O) (0 t1) T N M
N-- I- T N T
• N o) 0
N o M T o
Lnd' .4 TNc°
co aoco
Co 0 0o N M Lo
co M N T 1,..
M T d O
N N M � 'I' N
N N N T
J_
V
Z
M
0
U
}
H 2E
o U
a) v) LL p c
O O) co 0 .. a) c H a)
ow O i aO i .07c m .0
w c 0 C E
=
. 0 (Ii L c co O ci)
J
H
0
FINANCING STREET PROJECT
Cr) LC)
CD N
N CO
N
CO CO CO
tt
co I`
N r
CO CO
CO CO
CO LC)
N CO
N
>-
00
CO
N
LC)
N 0) LO
N N N
r T
00
\°
0
CO
'1t
i
0
0
0
oho
ti O
lf)
LC) Lf)
N CO N
r r
CO
CA
CO
CO
(.0
Lf)
N °
(D 0) CO
co d o
co
T O
Voter Receipts
- M
Total # Voters
Turn -out
c
o
O O
o
L
.1••+ _ - 0
E CD O 0 ^o` J co
W
O z O c
co
nc 5 0 -
, ^
v
_c c0 O G)
N 4)
a) c
0 a) E 0)
Q o •—
L
c >,_U
>
L
a) Q- `- 0
(>6 .0 tB Cn
L c J (A
a) O
_c c
..c -6_
c a)
-C
c V
r
O
E —�'
L O
Tis
Q 0
m ,X O
(7) a)
0 0 ,U
•� >y•
a) 0
c a)
c '-
c -
0 0
U
— (.(5 O a) N
a, 0
•U 0 ;D c
L
a) O)
_o c c
Ti c (a
= a)EE
R a)
c
L
O � a) 0
ca
U - c
A 0 >'-s
_0 (II
> i "0
0) CO 0
c a) (Un
> o_ co
O U c0 >
Es
ES (a U
L
(NI
a)
0)
>
O
Z
45
>
(0
L
(6
O
c
45
Jeff Reinert
Donna Carlson
John Bergeson
Caroline Dahl
Date: 10/20/2005 Time: 13:03:06 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
• Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4965 - 4965
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: S
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 392.30 392.30 .00 .00
000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 2,304.00 2,304.00 .00 .00
000593 BLACKBIRD, JIM 1 112.44 112.44 .00 .00
000604 RYLANDER, VERNON 1 104.90 104.90 .00 .00
000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00
000754 BRAGELMAN, CHRISTOPHER 1 164.96 164.96 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 4,531.38 4,531.38 .00 .00
001840 HILLESHEIM, TIM 1 154.96 154.96 .00 .00
002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 450.00 450.00 .00 .00
002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42 .00 .00
•3 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00
003230 MECKLE, TERRY 1 69.36 69.36 .00 .00
004400 TESCH, DAN 1 116.55 ' 116.55 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 14 11,584.27 11,584.27 .00 .00*
•
Date: 10/26/2005 Time: 13:09:23 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
. Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4980 - 4980
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000073 MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN 1 357.84 357.84 .00 .00
000490 ASLESON, MARTY 1 181.64 181.64 .00 .00
000539 TARGET 1 11.47 11.47 .00 .00
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,265.41 1,265.41 .00 .00
003230 MECKLE, TERRY 1 46.99 46.99 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 6,202.89 6,202.89 .00 .00
003492 PETTY CASH 1 277.48 277.48 .00 .00
003783 RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. 1 20,400.00 20,400.00 .00 .00
003973 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 9 28,803.72 28,803.72 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 10/31/2005 Time: 15:21:07
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
• Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4986 4986
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options:
Vendor #
001100
•
Detail / Summary: S
Name
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE
Grand Totals:
1 526.24 526.24 .00
1 526.24 526.24 .00 .00*
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:11:29
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
• Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4983 4983
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000016 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC. 2 2,399.18 2,399.18 .00 .00
000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 27.18 27.18 .00 .00
000057 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. 1 35.10 35.10 .00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 368.38 368.38 .00 .00
000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,. INC. 1 369.56 369.56 .00 .00
000111 GLEWWE DOORS, INC. 1 346.00 346.00 .00 .00
000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,386.63 1,386.63 .00 .00
000203 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS, LLC 1 236.09 236.09 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 2 75.86 75.86 .00 .00
000265 NASH SALES, INC. 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 6 686.90 686.90 .00 .00
111113 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00
000312 HUFFMAN, JAMES R. 1 613.68 613.68 .00 .00
000356 RICK BOSCHEE HOMES, INC. 1 1,371.87 1,371.87 .00 .00
000367 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 4 1,959.46 1,959.46 .00 .00
000405 RYDEEN, LESTER 1 49.99 49.99 .00 .00
000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 749.47 749.47 .00 .00
000440 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 2,410.30 2,410.30 .00 .00
000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,438.78 1,438.78 .00 .00
000478 ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. 1 800.00 800.00 .00 .00
000489 TDS METROCOM 1 1,390.31 1,390.31 .00 .00
•
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:11:30 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
# Name
# of items
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
Net Gross Discount Lost
000490 ASLESON, MARTY 1 168.11 168.11
.00 .00
000505 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 9,180.00 9,180.00
.00 .00
000593 BLACKBIRD, JIM 1 84.97 84.97
.00 .00
000688 LAIDLAW TOWN & COUNTRY BUS COMPANY, INC. 1 823.00 823.00 .00
.00
000698 KEY LAND HOMES 2 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 2,157.02 2,157.02 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 306.20 306.20 .00
.00
000797 TURNER, BOB 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00
000812 WHITE BEAR GLASS, INC. 1 182.96 182.96 .00
.00
000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 2 791.19 791.19 .00
.00
000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 39,019.83 39,019.83 .00
.00
000888 JOHNSON, RICK /DEER & BEAVER, INC. 1 90.00 90.00 .00
.00
000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 1 261.85 261.85 .00 .00
000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 14,300.20 14,300.20 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 618.69 618.69 .00 .00
000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 3,734.25 3,734.25 .00 .00
111/1.4 T/C BUILDERS, INC. 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 .00 .00
001064 TECHNAGRAPHICS, INC. 1 1,522.95 1,522.95 .00 .00
001095 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW AND UBAN, INC. 1 11,708.42 11,708.42 .00 .00
001129 BROOKLYN PARK POLICE 1 220.00 220.00 .00 .00
001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 139.34 139.34 .00 .00
001247 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 1 499.41 499.41 .00 .00
001269 FORCE AMERICA, INC. 1 39.88 39.88 .00 .00
001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 20.60 20.60 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 7,533.48 7,533.48 .00 .00
001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,568.55 4,568.55 .00 .00
•
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:11:31
# Name
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 3
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001339 URS CORPORATION 1 7,940.00 7,940.00 .00 .00
001360 E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC. 1 24.92 24.92 .00 .00
001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 107.71 107.71 .00
.00
001480 HAWKINS INC. 3 3,413.17 3,413.17 .00
.00
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 3 305.93 305.93 .00 .00
001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 890.31 890.31 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 121.95 121.95 .00 .00
001618 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 551,783.14 551,783.14 .00 .00
001700 GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE 1 265.00 265.00 .00 .00
001752 MOONEN, PATRICK 1 230.42 230.42 .00 .00
001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 1 427.51 427.51 .00 .00
001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 41.71 41.71 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 176.00 176.00 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 30.65 30.65 .00 .00
001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 153.36 153.36 .00 .00
001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 127.64 127.64 .00 .00
111112 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE 1 99.60 99.60 .00 .00
002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00
002230 DIVINE, MARY 1 135.70 ' 135.70 .00 .00
002329 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. 1 5.75 5.75 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 3 773.35 773.35 .00 .00
002410 LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00
002493 FIRST STATE TIRE RECYCLING, INC. 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 165.06 165.06 .00 .00
002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 1.82 1.82 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 365.00 365.00 .00 .00
002590 MICKELSON, LESTER 1 314.04 314.04 .00 .00
•
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:11:31
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 4
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
# Name # of items Net Gross Discount
Lost
Discount
002770 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY 1 2.58
2.58 .00 .00
002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42
.00 .00
003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 87.09 87.09
.00 .00
003090 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 140.00 140.00
.00 .00
003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 1,690.34 1,690.34
.00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 231.15 231.15 .00
.00
003228 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPANY, INC. 1 9,439.95 9,439.95 .00
.00
003260 STANSBERRY, KAY 1 99.25 99.25 .00
.00
003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1 42.59 42.59 .00
.00
003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 2,679.26 2,679.26 .00
.00
003465 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 2 125.56 125.56 .00
.00
003483 COPELAND CONSTRUCTION 1 311.52 311.52
.00 .00
003489 EIKUM, JEANNE 1 66.00 66.00 .00
.00
003506 FLAHERTY'S ARDEN BOWL 1 432.00 432.00
.00 .00
003511 KROMER COMPANY, LLC 1 332.58 332.58 .00
.00
003517 NOBLE WELDING & MFG., INC. 1 35.00 35.00
• .00 .00
0 DENNIS L. CONROY, PH.D. 1 1,050.00 1,050.00
.00 .00
003521 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. 1 1,082.72 1,082.72
.00 .00
003523 MARY KAY'S 1 387.60 387.60
.00 .00
003524 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 1 217.20 217.20
.00 .00
003551 RYAN COMPANIES 1 285.84 285.84
.00 .00
003552 UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES OF MID -MN, INC. 1 116,704.95 116,704.95
.00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 9 968.76 968.76
.00 .00
003816 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. 1 1,950.00 1,950.00
.00 .00
003820 ROSS, TIMOTHY 1 212.15 212.15 .00
.00
003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 5 19,570.84 19,570.84 .00
.00
003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 55.95 55.95 .00
.00
•
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:11:31 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 5
410 # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
003927 HENRY'S WATERWORKS, INC. 2 2,979.26 2,979.26 .00
.00
004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 195.76 195.76 .00
.00
004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 30.00 30.00 .00
.00
004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 1 177.76 177.76
.00 .00
004100 SPRINGSTED, INC. 2 43,451.07 43,451.07 .00 .00
004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 33.49 33.49 .00 .00
004224 XCEL OUTDOOR LIGHTING 2 29,104.00 29,104.00
.00 .00
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 2 555.91 555.91 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 3 1,510.53 1,510.53 .00 .00
004350 T.K.D.A. 24 109,308.08 109,308.08 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 7 1,811.75 1,811.75 .00 .00
004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 2 2,950.05 2,950.05 .00 .00
004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 701.19 701.19 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 4 5,539.09 5,539.09 .00 .00
004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 755.70 755.70 .00 .00
004606 U. S. BANK 1 1,035.00 1,035.00 .00 .00
11108 SPRINT 1 57.26 57.26 .00 .00
004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 41.55 41.55 .00 .00
005005 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING, INC. 1 88.07 ' 88.07 .00 .00
005026 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1 199.20 199.20 .00 .00
005032 CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. 1 1,112.93 1,112.93 .00 .00
006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 227.54 227.54 .00 .00
900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 2 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00
900491 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF 1 1,666.67 1,666.67 .00 .00
900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 480.22 480.22 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 203 1,068,401.76 1,068,401.76 .00 .00*
•
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:35 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 4969 - 4995
Bank #: (A)
Cash #: (A)
Payroll Check Dates: (A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 749.47
75220 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 392.30
0 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY' FORFEITURE /JEFFREY REIDE * * * * * * ** 199.20
0 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. TOW /KAWASAKI NINJA * * * * * * ** 306.20
0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI SAFETY CAMP DONATIONS * * * * * * ** 4,000.00
75223 CENTRAL PENSION FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 2,304.00
0 COPELAND CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER * * * * * * ** 311.52
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 2,549.78
0 EIKUM, JEANNE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 66.00
75226 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 450.00
0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT AG * * * * * * ** 176.00
0 KEY LAND HOMES REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6517 S * * * * * * ** 5,000.00
75227 KEY LAND HOMES REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6577 S * * * * * * ** 2,500.00
0 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 777.00
28 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING /DALE * * * * * * ** 37.00
29 MECKLE, TERRY REIMBURSE HEALTH INSURAN * * * * * * ** 69.36
0 MINNESOTA STATE TREASU FORFEIT /JEFFREY REIDELL * * * * * * ** 99.60
0 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME MECKLE, TERRY * * * * * * ** 246.42
75230 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME PAYROLL WITHHOLDING /MECK * * * * * * ** 246.42
75231 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURAN PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 400.00
0 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS REIMB BLDG ESCROW /345 OA * * * * * * ** 5,000.00
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 8,575.66
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN PUBLIC HEARING /SMW CREDI * * * * * * ** 20.70
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 1,081.82
0 RICK BOSCHEE HOMES, IN REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1211 P * * * * * * ** 1,371.87
0 RYAN COMPANIES REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER * * * * * * ** 285.84
0 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICK SITE PLAN /LAKEWOODS APAR * * * * * * ** 2,835.81
0 T.K.D.A. APOLLO LANDING /SEPTEMBER * * * * * * ** 51,798.31
0 T/C BUILDERS, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6469 P * * * * * * ** 2,500.00
0 URS CORPORATION HARDWOOD CREEK * * * * * * ** 7,940.00
0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A ATTORNEY /NOVEMBER * * * * * * ** 687.00
0 XCEL OUTDOOR LIGHTING LIGHTING /FOXBOROUGH * * * * * * ** 29,104.00
Total for Dept ** 132,081.28*
0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SALES TAX ADULT SP 1.82
0 TURNER, BOB REIMBURSE SOFTBALL FEE ADULT SP 140.00
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:35 Operator: JAL
•
Check #
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
Total for Dept 202
0 MENARDS, INC. TABLE /BLADES /REEL
Total for Dept 204
0 FLAHERTY'S ARDEN BOWL PROGRAM REC
0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH FLYERS
0 LAIDLAW TOWN & COUNTRY PROGRAM REC
Total for Dept 205
0 CROWN TROPHY, INC. TROPHIES
Total for Dept 208
OTHER
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
YOUTH SP
141.82*
111.65
111.65*
432.00
174.02
823.00
1,429.02*
499.41
499.41*
0 DIVINE, MARY REIMBURSE SITE VISIT /FLO MAYOR /CO 93.99
0 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV HARDWARE /PLUMBING /LUMBER MAYOR /CO -74.13
0 MARY KAY'S FLOAT COVER MAYOR /CO 387.60
0 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM NEWSLETTER /POSTAGE MAYOR /C0 2,679.26
75234 M SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL REGISTRATION /JOHN B & GO MAYOR /CO 30.00
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCT 19 /COUNCIL MAYOR /CO 1,086.25
Total for Dept 401 4,202.97*
0
0
0
75238
0
0
0
• 0
4
0
75233
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVI
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
M SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL
SPRINT
TESCH, DAN
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CONFERENCE - GORDON H
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
HEALTH INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
ADVERTISING /OFFICER
LIFE INSURANCE
REGISTRATION /JOHN B & GO
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
REIMBURSE MILEAGE /PARKIN
Total for Dept 402
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ELECTION NOTICE
TECHNAGRAPHICS, INC. BALLOTS
Total for Dept 403
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCT 13 /CHARTER
Total for Dept 405
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ELECTION
ELECTION
CHARTER
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMEE SENIORS
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS
0 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER SENIORS
Total for Dept 406
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FINANCE
•
307.11
63.62
265.00
44.99
2,377.10
35.10
656.46
28.50
30.00
57.26
116.55
3,981.69*
291.60
1,522.95
1,814.55*
278.50
278.50*
4.81
46.06
4.75
29.36
84.98*
107.30
50.41
770.09
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36 Operator: JAL
•
Check #
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE
0 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FINANCE
Total for Dept 407
0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A ATTORNEY /NOVEMBER LEGAL CO
Total for Dept 414
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC
0 DIVINE, MARY REEMBURSE SITE VISIT /FLO ECONOMIC
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC.
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC
Total for Dept 415
0
0
0
0
0
75241
0
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
SMYSER, JEFF
TARGET
TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE PROGRAM
COOKIES
SEPT 27/P & Z
Total for Dept 416
PLANNING
INS PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
0 T.K.D.A. GENERAL ENGINEERING /SEPT ENGINEER
Total for Dept 417
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
038 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS SERVICES
Total for Dept 418
0
75222
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75236
0
75238
75239
0
•
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
BRAGELMAN, CHRISTOPHER
BROOKLYN PARK POLICE
CENTRAL COMMUINICATION
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
DENNIS L. CONROY, PH.D
EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GLEWWE DOORS, INC.
I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY,
IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH
MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN
METRO SALES INCORPORAT
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PETTY CASH
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
TROUBLE SHOOT SIREN /BALL
REIMBURSE UNIFORM ALLOWA
SEMINAR /MELINDA B & MIKE
RADIO BOARD FEE /JULY, AU
DENTAL INSURANCE
ORAL INTERVIEW
SIREN MAINTENANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
LOCKSET
BADGES
ENVELOPES
REIMBURSE TUITION
COPIER EXCESS
MONTHLY SERVICE / SEPTEMBE
PETTY CASH
HEALTH INSURANCE
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
Amount
14.97
1,666.67
2,609.44*
13,550.70
13,550.70*
30.65
41.71
14.34
352.18
4.75
443.63*
61.30
27.68
704.36
9.50
30.00
11.47
139.75
984.06*
20,188.75
20,188.75*
61.30
30.69
14.01
660.28
9.50
180.00
955.78*
189.61
164.96
220.00
1,959.46
564.34
1,050.00
1,082.72
340.91
346.00
127.64
136.90
357.84
365.00
575.70
277.48
13,974.76
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36 Operator: JAL
•
Check #
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
O ROSS, TIMOTHY REISSUE LOST CHECK /74238
0 SHRED -IT, INC. DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT
O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI PAPER DELIVERY /DRUM DRIV
0 STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES
O TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
0 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN VEST
Total for Dept 420
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE
0 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, IN CHANGE WELL /SEPTIC TO CI
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 421
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
137.75
212.15
55.95
195.76
555.91
738.21
755.70
24,384.75*
89.83
40.34
1,802.06
9,180.00
14.25
11,126.48*
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING 122.62
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING 50.80
0 INTERNATIONAL CODE COU ADDITIONAL COST BUILDING 5.75
0 MOONEN, PATRICK REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING 230.42
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE BUILDING 77.29
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE BUILDING 2,266.74
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING 16.62
75232 RYLANDER, VERNON REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING 104.90
Total for Dept 422 2,875.14*
O A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO,
0 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMEN
II 0 BLACKBIRD, JIM
21 BLACKBIRD, JIM
O BROCK WHITE, INC.
O C. W. HOULE, INC.
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
O HUFFMAN, JAMES R.
0 JOHNSON, RICK /DEER & B
75237 MECKLE, TERRY
0 MICKELSON, LESTER
O NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS,
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0 NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
0 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC
0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS
O TDS METROCOM
75242 XCEL ENERGY
•
SOD
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
REIMBURSE CLOTHING
REIMBURSE CLOTHING
CRAFCO RENTAL
CATCH BASIN REPAIR
DENTAL INSURANCE
STREET SIGNS
LONG TERM DISABILITY
CLAMP /FUSE CART /SPRING /H
REMOVE BEAVER
DEER REMOVAL
REIMBURSE CLOTHING
REIMBURSE CLOTHING
STREET SIGNS
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
COARSE HIGHWAY SALT
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
BLACKTOP /INSTALL CULVERT
ASPHALT
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
MONTHLY SERVICE
Total for Dept 430
STREETS
STREETS
ALLOW STREETS
ALLOW STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
INS STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
ALLOW STREETS
ALLOW STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
-16-
27.18
2,410.30
84.97
112.44
791.19
3,734.25
179.31
107.71
71.54
29.72
613.68
90.00
46.99
314.04
1,690.34
62.21
9,439.95
1,949.89
34.90
1,950.00
1,510.53
113.93
3,713.40
29,078.47*
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
O CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME
O DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC.
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
0 FORCE AMERICA, INC.
0 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
0 H & L MESABI, INC.
0 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTION
0 MENARDS, INC.
0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC.
0 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, I
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
O RYDEEN, LESTER
O ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT,
0 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TI
0
0
0
75224
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
WASHERS /NUTS /TIES
HEADLAMP /CONNECTORS
GASOHOL
DENTAL INSURANCE
BRAKE PADS
CABLE
ALTERNATOR
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CLAMP /FUSE CART /SPRING /H
CARBON SNOW PLOW NOSE
SNOW PLOW SHEILD
GEL /GREASE /BLADE /TIE -DOW
STEERING WHEEL
HOSE REEL /U -JOINT /FILTER
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
SWITCH /KEYS /CONNECTOR
SERVICE CALL
Total for Dept 431
ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
E. L. REINHARDT COMPAN
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV
IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I
PITNEY BOWES, INC.
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
STANSBERRY, KAY
TDS METROCOM
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
WHITE BEAR GLASS, INC.
WIPERS AND WIPES, INC.
MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER
TROUBLE SHOOT SIREN /BALL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
DENTAL INSURANCE
PADLOCK
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CLAMP /FUSE CART /SPRING /H
HARDWARE /PLUMBING /LUMBER
ENVELOPES /LABELS
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CHECK
WORK PREFORMED
INK CARTRIDGE /TAPE
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
REPAIR DOORS
BULBS
GLASS REPAIR
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 432
O ARCADE ASPHALT, INC.
0 . CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS,
75224 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
•
PAVE BIRCH STREET PATH
MULCH
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CLAMP /FUSE CART /SPRING /H
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
75.86
139.34
7,533.48
35.25
231.15
39.88
305.93
13.55
7.39
427.51
42.59
35.06
87.09
261.85
646.83
5.46
49.99
33.49
236.09
10,207.79*
368.38
179.95
618.69
4,499.43
30.65
24.92
8.39
26.60
36.07
462.43
140.00
295.00
217.20
352.18
4.75
99.25
369.55
701.19
125.56
182.96
686.90
9,430.05*
800.00
1,112.93
31.95
137.94
67.76
36.68
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
0
0
0
75238
0
0
0
0
0
0
75242
Description
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
KROMER COMPANY, LLC
MENARDS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTO
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS
TDS METROCOM
TURF SUPPLIES, INC.
XCEL ENERGY
THREADLOCKER /SEAL -ALL
SPRING TEETH
TABLE /BLADES /REEL
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
PLAYGROUND TUNNELS
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE
Total for Dept 450
Dept
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
Amount
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI
0 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON QUARTER 3 /UNEMPLOYMENT RECREATI
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE RECREATI
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE RECREATI
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI
0 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT RECREATI
Total for Dept 451
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCT 3 /PARK BOARD PARK BOA
Total for Dept 452
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE ENVIRONM
•0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE ENVIRONM
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM
O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCT 12 /ENVIRONMENTAL BOA ENVIRONM
Total for Dept 461
30.65
332.58
18.35
199.19
2,399.18
891.00
26.13
79.64
34.33
2,950.05
73.64
9,222.00*
98.08
36.20
2.58
15.08
1,131.26
15.20
147.90
1,446.30*
139.75
139.75*
10.72
10.53
46.06
196.02
4.04
167.50
434.87*
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 9.20
O FIRST STATE TIRE RECYC 168 TIRES /RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA 250.00
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 4.55
O GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING 356 LAMPS & BALLAST -RECY SOLID WA 88.07
0 LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA 400.00
O NASH SALES, INC. RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA 200.00
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE SOLID WA 201.96
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA 1.43
Total for Dept 462 1,155.21*
0
75235
0
0
0
0
•
ASLESON, MARTY
ASLESON, MARTY
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 463
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
-18-
168.11
181.64
10.73
5.31
196.02
1.66
563.47*
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36
•
Operator: JAL
Page: 7
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept Amount
0 M00DY'S INVESTORS SERV GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPRO DEBT SER
0 SPRINGSTED, INC. GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPRO DEBT SER
0 U. S. BANK ADMINISTRATION FEE /OCT - DEBT SER
Total for Dept 470
0 BLAINE, CITY OF
75243 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
0 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
0 HAWKINS INC.
0 HENRY'S WATERWORKS, IN
75225 HILLESHEIM, TIM
0 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV
0 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES
0 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH,
0 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I
75238 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
0 TDS METROCOM
O WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.
75242 XCEL ENERGY
QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN
UTILITY POSTAGE
GAGE /CONNECTION
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CLAMP /FUSE CART /SPRING /H
GASKET /VALVE /TUBING
MARKER TAPE
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
HARDWARE /PLUMBING /LUMBER
PAINT
WATER SAMPLES
WATER METER PARTS
MONTHLY SERVICE /SEPTEMBE
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
VALVE /SWITCH /BUSHING /ADA
MONTHLY SERVICE
Total for Dept 494
0 BLAINE, CITY OF
75243 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
.0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 HENRY'S WATERWORKS, IN
0 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES
O NOBLE WELDING & MFG.,
O OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
0 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT
75242 XCEL ENERGY
0
0
0
0
75240
0
0
0
0
0
•
QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN
UTILITY POSTAGE
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
LID COVER
PAINT
REPAIR TOOL BOX
WORK PREFORMED
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
IMPELLER
MONTHLY SERVICE
Total for Dept 495
DAHLGREN SHARDLOW AND
GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATI
MOODY'S INVESTORS SERV
REED BUSINESS INFORMAT
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.
SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICK
SPRINGSTED, INC.
T.K.D.A.
UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /AU
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE /PHA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPRO
ADVERTISING /WELL
CONTRACTOR /WEST SHADOW P
FINAL DESIGN /LEGACY
ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLI
'05 SURFACE WATER /SEPTEM
'05 OVERLAY PROJECT
ATTORNEY /NOVEMBER
2,000.00
19,873.27
1,035.00
22,908.27*
WATER 816.02
WATER 263.12
WATER 20.60
WATER 96.54
WATER 24.43
WATER 21.56
WATER 3,413.17
WATER 1,606.95
WATER 154.96
WATER 79.77
WATER 76.68
WATER 90.00
WATER 5,539.09
WATER 184.82
WATER 1,161.81
WATER 11.42
WATER 104.93
WATER 41.55
WATER 1,675.66
15,383.08*
SEWER 1,341.00
SEWER 263.12
SEWER 65.90
SEWER 24.45
SEWER 1,372.31
SEWER 76.68
SEWER 35.00
SEWER 185.22
SEWER 809.63
SEWER 11.38
SEWER 1,386.63
SEWER 740.19
6,311.51*
OTHER 11,708.42
OTHER 551,783.14
OTHER 3,000.00
OTHER 177.76
OTHER 20,400.00
OTHER 16,555.03
OTHER 23,577.80
OTHER 37,321.02
OTHER 116,704.95
OTHER 62.50
-19-
Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 10:16:36 Operator: JAL
City of Lino Lakes
• FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
•
•
Page: 8
Total for Dept 499 781,290.62*
Grand Total 1,109,315.99*
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
10/28/2005
•
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
10/27/2005 14940
10/27/2005 14941
10/27/2005 14942
10/27/2005 14943
10/27/2005 14944
10/27/2005 14945
10/27/2005 14946
10/27/2005 14947
10/27/2005 14948
10/27/2005 14949
10/27/2005 14950
10/27/2005 14951
10/27/2005 14952
10/27/2005 14953
•
•
Anoka County Central Communication
Birch Lake Eye Clinic
Centennial Firefighter's Relief Assn.
(Pass through of State Aid)
Centennial Utilities
Center Frame and Wheel Alignment, Inc.
CenterPoint Energy
Connexus Energy
Fairview Lakes Clinic
Janet Haapoja
Metrocall
Milo Bennett
Speedway Super America
Viking Office Products
Visionary Systems, Inc.
Total
ACCOUNT
42130 - Equipment Expense
42120 - Uniform Expense
33600 - Miscellaneous Income
42251 - Station 1 - Gas
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42253 - Station 2 - Gas
42252 - Station 1 - Electric
42150 - Medical Physicals
42180 - Office Supplies
42240 - Telephone
42220 - Travel, Conf., School Ex.
42100 - Fuel & Lube
42180 - Office Supplies
42110 - Other Maintenance
AMOUNT
338.25
131.58
149,114.00
63.27
70.00
55.60
328.32
142.00
10.83
82.53
1,297.03
557.68
243.68
709.10
153,143.87
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 1B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger
DATE: November 14, 2005
TOPIC: Application for Centennial Middle School PTA to
Conduct Excluded Bingo
BACKGROUND:
Under Minnesota Statute 349.166, excluded bingo may be conducted by an organization
that conducts four or fewer bingo occasions in a calendar year, or in connection with a
county fair, the state fair, or a civic celebration if it is not conducted for more than 12
consecutive days. There is no license fee involved.
The Centennial Middle School PTA is requesting approval to hold its annual student -
parent bingo family night. This event will be held at Centennial Middle School, 399 Elm
Street, on Friday, February 3, 2006.
The application, the certificate of non - profit status and the results of the background
investigation are on file in the city clerk's office.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the request to conduct the bingo event.
2. Deny the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1
-22-
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGNINATOR: Gordon Heitke
MEETING DATE: November 14, 2005
TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -180 Extending the Joint Powers Agreement
for VLAWMO
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The existing joint powers agreement with the member units which comprise the Vadnais Lake
Area Water Management Organization ( VLAWMO) expires at the end of 2005. Throughout
the past year, the City of Lino Lakes has maintained a position that it favored merging into a
watershed district in order to have a structure which would have the resources to more
effectively manage water issues. While some other members have also expressed concern
about VLAWMO's effectiveness and the need to make changes to the structure of governance,
all other members have indicated that they will extend the current JPA for another year. The
withdrawal of the City of Lino Lakes has the impact of reducing the effectiveness of
VLAWMO's ability to manage the watershed unit as a portion of it would be outside of their
area of jurisdiction and the City would have to find another means of administering wetland
regulations.
At the City Council work session of October 19, 2005, the Council concluded that the best
course of action at this time is to agree to an additional one -year extension of the JPA, allowing
for progress to be made on the completion of the water plan, developing plans for obtaining
adequate funding for the future, and resolving issues of governance related to member unit
representation, eligible representatives, and voting.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution No. 05 -180, Extending the Joint Powers Agreement for
VLAWMO.
Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends extending the Joint Powers Agreement for VLAWMO.
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -180
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE EXISTING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COMMUNITIES OF THE VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER
MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2007
WHEREAS, VLAWMO was organized in 1983 to be the responsible governmental unit to
provide oversight and management to see that the requirements of the
Metropolitan Water Management Act were enforced in the Vadnais Lake
Watershed area; and
WHEREAS, the existing Joint Powers Agreement will expire on January 1, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes acknowledges that there are area of VLAWMO's
authority that need to be improved and potential changes to the Joint
Powers Agreement considered during 2006; and
WHEREAS, the extension of the Joint Powers for an additional year will provide
adequate time to accomplish those organizational changes and
improvements,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes recommends
that the Point Powers Agreement between member communities be extended for a period
of one year, until January 1, 2007; and that work on updating the VLAWMO Water
Management Plan begin immediately.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by and was supported by
and was declared adopted based upon the following vote:
VOTE
ATTEST
, the duly qualified of
, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and
accurate representation of action taken by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes on
the date first written.
Position:
Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk
Date
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
-25-
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Gordon Heitke, City Administrator
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 14, 2005
TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Fee Schedule
FIRST READING READING, Ordinance No. 12 -05,
Establishing 2006 Fee Schedule
VOTE REQUIRED: Roll Call Vote - 3/5 SIMPLE MAJORITY
BACKGROUND:
In order to provide for a more efficient and timely method of reviewing and adjusting the
various fees charged by the City, all fees are consolidated into one fee schedule to be reviewed
and adopted on an annual basis. Some of these fees have specific statutory requirements.
Staff has reviewed the fees charged by the individual departments and recommended changes
to increase or change fees in some cases, or for the purpose of compliance with Minnesota
statutory requirements.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve first reading of Ordinance No. 12 -05.
2. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Option 1.
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
(Ord. 12 -05)
20065 FEE SCHEDULE
•
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
3.2 BEER INVESTIGATION $250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE
3.2 BEER OFF -SALE $200.00/YEAR
3.2 BEER ON -SALE $300.00/YEAR
3.2 BEER ON -SALE TEMPORARY $50.00 + $5.00/DAY
CLUB LICENSE $300.00
LIQUOR LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE$250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE
LIQUOR ON- SALE,LICENSE $4,500.00/YEAR
,LIQUOR OFF -SALE $200.00
LIQUOR TEMPORARY PERMIT $50.00
TEMPORARY SET -UP LICENSE $25.00
WINE LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE $250.00 INDIV. $450.00 CORPORATE
WINE $500.00/YEAR
SUNDAY LIQUOR $200.00/YEAR
AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION
CABARET LICENSE $35.00
DANCES $200.00/YEAR
GAMBLING PERMIT APPLICATION $10.00
STATE LICENSED GAMBLING: REGULATION TAX
1/10 OF 1% OF NET PROFITS
•UILDING- CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES
Building Permit Fee Schedule
Fee Table
Total Valuation
Fee
$1.00 to $500.00
$23.50
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$23.50 for the first $500.00 plus $3.05 for each
additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$69.25 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.00 for each
additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$391.25 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each
additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000.00
1
•
•-1 Deleted: 25 -04
1 Deleted: NEW
Deleted: EXISTING
LICENSE $4,000.00¶
EFF
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00
$643.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.00 for each
additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000.00
100,001.00 to $500,000.00
$993.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.60 for each
additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00
$3,233.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.75 for each
additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up
$5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.15 for
each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $47.00 per hour*
2. Reinspection fee $47.00 per trip
3. Erosion Control Reinspection fee $47.00 per trip
4. Inspections for which no fee is specifically designed $47.00 per trip
5. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions $47.00 per hour **
6. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Actual Cost * **
7. Deck Permit Fee Permit fee table based
on $10.00 per square foot value
8. Basement Finish Permit Fee Permit fee table based
on $15.00 per square foot value
9. Underground Swimming Pool $141.00, plus state
surcharge
10. Aboveground Swimming Pool
$47.00, plus state
surcharge
ell. Plan Review Fee
a. 65% of the Building Permit Fee
b. In instances where two (2) or more permits are issued for a residential structure, the plan review fee shall
be forty percent (40 %) per dwelling unit.
12. Escrow Fees
At the time of the final certificate of occupancy if the following items are not completed, an escrow in the
amount indicated will be taken. There are two options for entering into an escrow agreement with the City.
The escrow can be paid to the City and an agreement filled out and signed by the payee and City Official, or
the title company or lending institution can hold the escrow and fill out an agreement form stating they are the
responsible party for holding the funds for the uncompleted items.
c. Driveway- $1,000.00
d. Exterior Concrete - $1,000.00
e. Landscaping - $2,500.00
f. As -built Surveys - $1,000.00
g. Stucco (final coat only) - $1,000.00
h. Garage Floor - $1,000.00
2
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
i. There will be a $50.00 non - refundable administrative fee for escrow deposits
The only time these items can be uncompleted is during the winter months, except landscaping. A temporary
•certificate of occupancy shall be issued and unfinished work must be completed within six (6) months
(weather permitting) after entering into the escrow agreement.
13. Easement Encroachment Fee $30.00
14. Fence Permit $47.00
15. Sign Permit Fee Table
16. All Residential Mechanical Permits, (except new construction and air conditioning $25.00
17. Residential New Construction Mechanical Permit $60.00
18. Residential Air Conditioning Permit 1% of the contract price ($25.00 minimum fee)
19. Commercial Mechanical Permit 1% of the contract price ($25.00 minimum fee)
20. Manufactured Home Permits $90.00
21. Plumbing Permit $9.00 per fixture ($15.00 minimum fee)
22. Sewer Connection Fee $200.00
23. Water Connection Fee $250.00
24. Contractor License Verification $5.00 per permit
25. Contractor License $50.00
26. SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) per Met Council
27.3/0" Water Meter $290.00
28. 1" Water Meter $325.00
29. MXU Unit $125.00
30. Septic Installation or Repair Permit $150.00
31. Septic Pumping Permit $5.00
32. Demolition Permit $47.00
*Inspections made out side of normal business hours is a three -hour minimum charge
* *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
** *Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
3
SIGN PERMIT - TEMPORARY
TOUCH PAD
CURB STOP COVERS
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
$25 .00/TERM
$20.00
$68.00
n escrow may be required, as determined by the City Engineer, to cover all costs incurred by the City for plan
evision and construction observation.
UTILITY FEES
SEWER RATE
WATER METER RENTAL
ADDITIONAL ACCESSORIES
WATER USAGE FEES
$52.00 /QUARTER/REU +$1.00 PER 1000 GALLONS
OVER 10,000 GALLONS
$400.00 (DEPOSIT) / $25 PER MONTH
$25.00 PER MONTH
$10.00 PER QUARTER / REU
$1.77 PER THOUSAND GALLONS (0 — 30,000 GAL.)
$2.07 PER THOUSAND GALLONS (OVER 30,000 GAL.)
VALVE REPLACEMENT $45.00 EACH
UNDERGROUND UTILITY PERMIT $50.00
METER TESTING (OUR COST, DELIVERED TO MINNEAPOLIS)
5/8" — 3/4" METER TEST $50.00
1" METER TEST $65.00
1 -1/2" — 2" METER TEST $100
BUSINESS & MISCELLANEOUS
ASSESSMENT SEARCH FEE
URNING PERMIT
CITY HOME RULE CHARTER
DOG KENNEL
DOG LICENSE MALE/FEMALE
DOG LICENSE MALE/FEMALE
ANIMALS IMPOUNDMENT FEE
COPIES: CITY CODE BOOK
COPIES: MAILED MINUTES
COPIES: AGENDA
COPIES: PER SIDE
COPIES: NEW RESIDENT LABELS
COPIES: AERIAL/TOPO MAP
CITY MAP
20/20 BOOK
COMP. PLAN.
•
$20.00 /SEARCH
$10.00
1ST COPY FREE /$10.00 EACH ADDITIONAL COPY
$20.00/YEAR
$10.00
$5.00 (SPAYED OR NEUTERED)
$25.00*
$75.00
$36.00/YEAR
$12.00/YEAR
$ 1sT 10 COPIES FREE, THEN .25 PER PAGE
$5.00 PER MONTH FLAT FEE
$10.00
$2.00
$3.50
$55.00
4
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK $55.00
FAX CHARGE $1' 10 PAGES FREE, THEN .25 PER PAGE
GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE $75.00/FIRST TRUCK $45.00 EACH ADDITIONAL
OVERWEIGHT PERMIT $20.00
WN SHOP CLASS A $10,000.00
AWN SHOP CLASS B $7,000.00
CLASS A SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER $720.00
CLASS B SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER $105.00
CLASS C SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER $NO FEE
PAWN SHOP INVESTIGATION $15,000. DEPOSIT
PAWN SHOP IN STATE INVESTIGATION $750.00
PAWN SHOP OUT STATE INVESTIGATION $20,000.00
RECYCLING CONTAINER PURCHASE 1ST Free / $8.00 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL
RESIDENTS GUIDE $1.00
SPECIAL EVENT - TWO -DAY SALE PERMIT $50.00
TAPES: AUDIO $10.00
TAPES: VIDEO $15.00
TOBACCO LICENSE $00/YEAR
TRANSIENT MERCHANT 5250.00/6 MONTHS
TREE PRESERVATION TAPE $15.95 /ROLL
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN REVIEW $68.00
TREE LOCATION INSPECTION VISITS $68.00
SITE VISITS $68.00
PEDDLER/SOLICITOR $250.00/6 MONTHS
RETURN CHECK CHARGE $27.50
ZONING MAPS $5.00 /LARGE or COLORED
ZONING ORDINANCE 525.00
CULVERT PRICES
ALL CULVERT PRICES ARE BASED ON MARKET PRICES AND INCLUDE TAX & DELIVERY & AND
15% ADMINISTRATION FEE
ARK & RECREATION USER FEES
FIELD RENTAL — RESIDENT ONLY
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL DRAG ONLY
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL DRAG & CHALK
SOCCER (EXCLUDING YOUTH)
PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION
PARTY WAGON - BLOCK PARTY
MON.- THURS., NON -BLOCK PARTY
FRI., SAT. OR SUN.,NON -BLOCK PARTY
PLAYGROUND GRAB BAGS
FIRE REGULATIONS
•
$20/EVENING
$30/EVENING
$65/EVENING
RESIDENTS - NO FEE
NON - RESIDENT - $25
NO FEE
$25
$40
$10.00 / $25.00
5
{ Deleted: 25
ANNUAL PERMIT FOR SALE
OF CONSUMER FIREWORKS
•
PLANNING& ZONING
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
$350 EXCLUSIVE RETAIL SELLER /
$100 IN CONJUNCTION WITH EXISTING RETAIL
STORE
ESCROW
FEE DEPOSIT*
APPLICATION FEE (REQUIRED WITH EACH SUBMITTAL) $50
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
40 ACRES OR LESS $750
MORE THAN 40 ACRES $2,500 - - -1 Deleted: 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
$300
$1,500
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET $10,000
INTERIM USE PERMIT $300
REZONING
40 ACRES OR LESS
MORE THAN 40 ACRES
$1,000
$2,000
SITE PLAN REVIEW $1,500
SUBDIVISION
MINOR SUBDIVISION / LOT SPLIT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
40 ACRES OR LESS
OVER 40 ACRES)
FINAL PLAT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN
FINAL PLAN
PARK DEDICATION - RESIDENTIAL
PARK DEDICATION — COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
S1,000
$2,500
$5,000
51.500
$7,500
52.500
$7,500
52.500
52,075 PER UNIT
$2,175 PER ACRE
TAX INCREMENT FINANACING OR TAX ABATEMENT $7,500
VACATION (street, utility, drainage) $500
VARIANCE $200
6
•
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 pt, First
line: 0 pt
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 18, 2005
*An escrow account shall be established as indicated above to cover all expenses incurred by the City as part of
the plan review. In the case of applications including multiple requests the highest escrow deposit amount will be
the only one initially required. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City during plan review.
the escrow account drops below 10% of the original deposit amount the City will require the submittal of an
itional escrow deposit sufficient to cover any anticipated expenses. Upon the City's determination that the
oject is complete or expired, the City will return the remaining escrow deposit to the applicant.
POLICE FEES
DANGEROUS DOG PERMIT
COPY OF REPORT
COPY OF RE:PORT — MAIL IN
VEHICLE LOCKOUTS
CLEARANCE LETTER
FINGERPRINTING
VIDEO IMAGE PRINTING
PHOTOGRAPHS
BOOKING PHOTOGRAPHS
ELECTRONIC PHOTOGRAPHS
FALSE ALARMS
VEHICLE FORFEITURE FEE
VIDEOTAPE COPY
•
$35.00
FREE TO SUBJECT OF DATA UP TO 3
PAGES. 4,7 PAGE $1.00 THEN $ 25 A
ADDL PAGES UP TO 100
54.00 UP TO 4 PAGES, THEN 5.25 PER
PAGE THERE AFTER..
NO CHARGE
$5.00
$10.00, BY APPT.
$5.00
$25.00 PLUS DEVELOPING COST
$5.00
$5.00 PER PAGE OF FOUR
3 FREE; 4 -10 $50.00;
11 OR MORE $100.00 /CALENDAR YR.
$100.00 PER VEHICLE
$25.00
NY -•-{ Formatted: Superscript
_ _ _ _ _ Deleted: 55.00 UP TO 5 PAGES,
.., I THEN $.25 / PAGE
COSTS INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE TAXES
*CITY INCURRED COSTS IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ADDED
iiiATE PENALTY FEE: A LATE CHARGE OF 10% OR $25.00, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, WILL
E CHARGED FOR ANY FEES NOT PAID WHEN DUE.
7
•
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 pt,
Hanging: 324 pt
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3 D
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 14 November 2005
SUBJECT City Clerk Hiring
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
We received a large number of applications after the departure of Ann Blair from the city clerk's
position. The applications were screened first interviews conducted by the city administrator, the
deputy clerk and myself. We then tested and conducted second interviews with 3 finalists.
Based on this and a subsequent background check, we would like to make an offer of
employment to Ms. Julianne Bartell. Julianne has twenty years of experience in various
positions with the Minneapolis city clerk's office.
We expect Julianne to begin with the city later this month.
OPTIONS
1. Extend an offer of employment to Julianne Bartell.
RECOMMENDATION
Number One.
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
AGENDA ITEM 6 A
Jeff Smyser
November 14, 2005
i. Resolution No. 05 -153
Comprehensive Plan Amendment: West of I -3 5E
ii. General Concept Plan, Planned Unit Development
Village of Hardwood Creek
VOTE: .4/5 for Resolution No. 05 -153
*no formal vote needed for concept plan
BACKGROUND
We have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the
comprehensive plan. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a fonual vote. The
application also includes a general concept plan for a planned unit development. The
concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. It is important to note that
approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to an
approval of the PUD application that likely will follow.
The 2004 growth management policy (Ordinance 24 -04) was prepared to implement the
intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several
issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project
application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as
directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the
comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. The
amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements.
This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does
not include the detailed information normally part of such applications. Because of this,
we cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for the exemptions to certain
growth management limits as a conservation development. In addition, there are some
limits from which we cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan
amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as changing the land use
designation for the site.
Basically, three parts of the plan amendment relate directly to the application: changing
the land use, adding MUSA, and addressing the growth management issues. Because the
comprehensive plan is a city -wide document, we need to ensure that amendments to the
document support future planning needs in this area and elsewhere in the city.
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 2
The suggested text amendments to the comprehensive plan are indicated and appear in a
separate font. The proposed land use map change is one of the attachments to the report.
The P & Z opened the public hearing on September 14 and continued it to a special
meeting on September 27 dealing exclusively with this application. The P & Z voted to
recommend adoption of the comprehensive plan amendments described here and listed in
Resolution 05 -153.
It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not
grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design
specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD review.
ANALYSIS
Site Summary: The site comprises 363 acres west of 35E and east of 20th Ave. (see
Site Location map). The site has been used for agricultural purposes. There are two
existing homes on the site, fronting 20th Ave. Two smaller properties comprising about
seven acres form a rectangle along 20th Ave. and are not part of the site at this time.
However, this seven acres should be included in the land use change and MUSA if the
larger site is to be changed. The following table lists the land uses and zoning on the site.
Location Existing Land Use
Site
North
South
agriculture, residential
agriculture, residential
townhomes, vacant
Guided Land l
Industrial, High
Residential, Me
Residential
Rural and Medii
Residential
East 1 -35 E and agricultural
West
agriculture, residential
• Commercial (1
• Commercial a
Residential (C
1 -35 E, Industria
Low Density Se
Low Density Un
Ise
Existing Zoning
Density
dium- Density
Rural and Rural
Business
Reserve
am- Density
Rural and Rural
Business
Reserve
_ino Lakes)
nd High- Density
;enterville)
Rural Business
Reserve
I
Rural
wered Resid.,
sewered Resid.
Rural Business
Reserve
The comprehensive plan guides the site for industrial, high- density residential, and
medium - density residential uses. To the south of the site, 40 acres is in Centerville and is
guided for high- density residential and commercial uses in the Centerville comprehensive
plan. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The site is zoned Rural and
Rural Business Reserve. Details of the proposed land use map and zoning map are
attached.
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 3
A number of small wetlands pepper the site, many of which have been farmed. Patches
of trees exist around the perimeter of the site.
A pipeline runs diagonally through the northeast corner of the site.
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Reserve: The Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA) is the area within which the City can extend sanitary sewer. Most
cities simply map their MUSA. Lino Lakes has land within the mapped MUSA but also
has a MUSA reserve. As part of the approval of the comprehensive plan in 2002, the
City received additional MUSA reserve acres from the Metropolitan Council. The
amount of MUSA reserve was based on the City's estimates of the need for residential
and commercial /industrial development. There are only 90 acres remaining in reserve for
Stage 1 (pre -2010) residential development and 68.5 acres for commercial /industrial
development.
The development project site requires 363 acres of additional MUSA. The rectangular
exception is about 7 acres, for a total of 370 acres. A request for 370 acres of new
MUSA would be part of the amendment submitted to Metropolitan Council for review.
Under state statute, every municipality in the Metropolitan Area must have a
comprehensive plan, and must submit amendments to the Metropolitan Council for
review. The Met Council compares the city's plan to the regional Development
Framework, which includes plans for the individual systems over which the Met Council
has jurisdiction. These include sanitary sewer treatment, regional open space,
transportation, and airports. Control over MUSA is how the Met Council ensures its
sewer treatment facility planning is not overburdened or underutilized. Underutilization
is wasted capital improvement, and thus poor use of public funds.
Growth Management, Number of Units: The growth policy establishes a
target for the number of dwelling units that can be platted each year: 147. This works
out to a total of 1029 units between 2003 and 2010 (147 x 7 years = 1029). There are 76
units available for year 2007, 147 for 2008, and 147 for 2009. The proposed
development area is intended to accommodate 1200 to 1250 dwelling units over six
years. This would exceed the 1029 total and the 147 per year.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
The following lists amendments of the comprehensive plan to be considered:
(1) The proposed land use plan map must be amended if the application is to be
approved. The current designations are Industrial, Medium- Density, and High -
Density Residential. This would be changed to guide the entire site for Mixed Use.
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 4
(2) The amendment must include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for the Stage 1
growth area.
(3) Even though our comprehensive plan includes Mixed Use on the proposed land use
map, there is no description of this land use category in the text of the document.
This should be addressed by describing the intent of the Mixed Use category.
(4) The growth management ordinance states that an amendment of the comprehensive
plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the
annual target for new growth (units /year) would be exceeded (Section 2, 7.). It is
unlikely that the master plan for this development could proceed within the limits of
the target of 147 units per year. (The 1029 units for Stage 1 noted in Section 2,
paragraph 5 of the growth policy, is based on 147 x 7 years.) This comprehensive
plan amendment would fulfill the requirement of the growth management ordinance.
(5) The comprehensive plan itself includes a list of Growth Management Policies, which
includes "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a
three year supply lot inventory" (page 27). As stated above, this would not
accommodate the anticipated development project. This statement should be
reviewed to accommodate the potential advantages of master planning large areas.
(6) The growth goals described in the comprehensive plan "assume an average of 147
new households annually through the year 2020" (page 63). This statement merits
discussion.
(1) & (2) Land Use Plan Amendment: Land Uses and MTJSA
The comprehensive plan includes a "Proposed Land Use" map. The application includes
amending that map. Currently, the site includes land guided Industrial (290 acres),
Medium Density Residential (45 acres), and High Density Residential (25 acres). The
AUAR included a market analysis based on recent development rates in Lino Lakes.
There are 1072 acres guided for industrial uses along 35E. At historic rates, it would take
well over 100 years to develop all this industrial land. Converting some of this to
accommodate the commercial and residential development that would make up the
Village of Hardwood Creek project will not prevent industrial growth in the city.
• The proposed land use for the site should be changed to Mixed Use, as shown on the
attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use Plan (Detail) ".
• The amendment should include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for this project.
This new MUSA would be applied to the site, not held in the MUSA reserve. The
resulting MUSA line is shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map.
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 5
(3) & (4) Text Amendment: "Mixed Use" Land Use Category and Addressing
the Growth Management Ordinance
The comprehensive plan Proposed Land Use Map includes twelve land use categories.
The text in the Land Use Plan chapter of the document include discussion of nine of the
categories. The three categories not discussed are Public /Semi - Public, Manufactured
Home Park, and Mixed Use. The 35W interchange area of the Legacy at Woods Edge
and the Marketplace developments are the largest areas guided Mixed Use. The other is
the area northwest of the Hodgson/CR J intersection. The Mixed Use category should be
described in the text of the comprehensive plan, this project site should be listed, and it
should be clear that the growth management policy requirement has been addressed.
• The following text be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land Use
Plan chapter, on page 97:
MIXED USE
The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The
Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a
variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the
same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might
include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development,
as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development
project in a Mixed Use area could include only one type of land use, other land
use designations are available for development with only one type of land use.
Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the
flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not
require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred
design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will
pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be
reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review.
Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than
residential development, which raises stormwater management design
challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed
Use and use designation envisions varied land uses, and recognizes the
possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These
can best be addressed with extensive environmental review.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and
development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes
clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited
to:
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 6
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without the project
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without the
project
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without the
project
Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following
performance standards:
1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses
in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition,
landscaping, and site access.
2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and
convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access
management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways.
3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available.
4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site
planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water
management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect
and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and
other natural methods whenever feasible.
5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility,
connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space
to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of
interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents.
6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically
pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes.
West Side of I -35E
• A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between l -35E
and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 7
residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to
600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety
of single family and multi - family residential development will include
approximately 1200 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be
approximately 4.5 units per acre, when including all and not within the
commercial area. While these are the approximate use parameters, the specifics
of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit
development approach.
In the northeast corner of the site, a triangle is formed by I -35E, a pipeline, and
the property boundary. This area could be designed to accommodate an office
campus type use, which could be a suitable land use along the freeway. This
would reduce the amount of residential and noted above and increase the
commercial land. Such flexibility is appropriate to accommodate what will be
determined as the best use of the triangle area.
This site is included in the 1 -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review
(AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation
plan that forms a part of the AUAR, which includes the Conservation
Development Framework as the fundamental precept for all development within
the AUAR area.
This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan
in 2005. This amendment was intended to fulfill the City's growth management
policy requirement that amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required
if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for
new growth (units /year) would be exceeded.
Text Amendment: Planning District 6
The comprehensive plan breaks the city into planning districts. The Village of Hardwood
Creek site is in Planning District 6. The PUD application will be compared to the
recommendations listed for Planning District 6. However, some reference to this site and
its Mixed Use designation is appropriate.
• The following text be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District 6
section, on page 153:
West Side of I -35E
A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and
CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential
uses. This site is described in the Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter.
The specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit
development approach.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 8
(5) Text Amendment: The 147 Statement On Page 27 of Comprehensive Plan
The comprehensive plan includes a great number of goals, policies, objectives,
recommendations, and strategies. The Policy Plan chapter includes a list of growth
management goals and policies. Policy number nine is: "Limit residential growth to an
average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory." The growth
management ordinance, Ord. 24 -04, provides for amending the comprehensive plan if
this target is to be exceeded:
An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if in order to
accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth
(units /year)...would be exceeded (Section 2, par. 7.).
The amendment will include the description of the site in the Mixed Use section, as
explained above. However, in order to avoid confusion, it would be advisable to amend
the limiting statement itself to provide for the possibility of amendment described in the
growth management ordinance.
• The policy on page 27 of the comprehensive plan should be amended to read as
follows:
9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year
supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public
purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The
City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development
project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may
include but is not limited to:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without exceeding the target
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without
exceeding the target
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without
exceeding the target
These four public purpose examples are taken directly from the growth management
ordinance. These are listed as potential reasons to justify an amendment of the comp plan
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 9
if a project would exceed the annual growth target. Incorporating them into the comp
plan itself provides consistency between the comprehensive plan and the growth
management policy ordinance.
(6) Text Review: Demographic Goals
The "Local Forecasts" section of the Land Use Plan chapter includes the growth goals for
the next decades: households, population, and employment. This statement is found on
page 63: "The goals assume an average of 147 new households annually through the
year 2020." This statement merits discussion.
To amend this statement raises the question of amending the growth projections, an
important part of planning the community's future. This will be extensively analyzed and
discussed as part of the overall review of the comprehensive plan that,must be completed
by the end of year 2008.
• Therefore, we recommend no amendment to this statement in the comprehensive plan.
Conservation Development Issues
Stormwater management methods, open space areas, connecting habitat and trail
greenways are conservation development elements described in several policy
documents. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan provides
guidance. As an incentive, the growth management policy allows conservation
development to be exempt from a number of the growth restrictions. The Alternative
Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the mitigation plan that the Conservation
Development Framework is a fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR
area. Every project can and must incorporate conservation development design and /or
low impact development techniques.
The applicants originally intended the application to be a conservation development
project. They are aware of the City's desire to encourage conservation design, and have
been following the AUAR project. They also found the growth management incentives
attractive. However, the exemptions from growth limits do not include the Stage 1
MUSA total, so a comp plan amendment would still be necessary.
In addition, we need a great deal of information to classify a project as a conservation
development in order to exempt it from the specified growth restrictions. Specific
information would include such things as stormwater management designs, open space
designs, long term stewardship plans for open space, etc. Such infoiniation typically
would be included in a planned unit development /plat application. The current
application for a comprehensive plan amendment does not include detailed information
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 10
that would support exempting a "conservation development" from specified growth
management limits.
Even so, we support the developer's efforts to incorporate as many environmentally
friendly elements as possible as the development design proceeds. The open space,
innovative stormwater management methods and attention to the long teen management
of these design features demonstrate good planning by the developer and are consistent
with the City's environmental planning goals. The site is within the AUAR area and all
development there must observe the Conservation Development Framework. The means
that conservation development elements will be mandatory in the PUD design.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN
The developer's intent is to master plan the 363 acres for commercial and residential
uses. The specifics are not finalized yet. As described in the zoning ordinance, the
purpose of a PUD general concept plan is to provide an opportunity for the applicant to
submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature
of the entire development. The concept plan provides an opportunity for the proposal to
be publicly considered at an early stage.
Discussions with the City Council to date on earlier concepts have yielded the following
comments:
• The name of the project will be re- examined. The town center area at the I -3 5W
interchange is referred to as "the village ". The I -35E development area should have a
name that does not cause confusion.
• The number of multi - family units should be re- examined.
• The developer should aspire to the higher quality housing products.
• There is support for examining the possibility of single -level products to
accommodate those needing units without stairs, such as seniors.
The following elements of the proposed general concept plan represent the immediately
significant elements for review, as listed in the zoning ordinance.
1) Overall Maximum PUD Density Range.
The application includes ranges of units and acreages. In Lino Lakes, density is
calculated on the net area: simply by subtracting the wetlands from the gross site
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 11
acreage. Some rough estimating, which includes open space and right of way data for
the residential area only, leads to a residential density about 4.5 units per acre.
2) General Location of Major Streets and Pedestrian Ways.
The concept plan includes the main collectors and access points envisioned in the
draft AUAR (see attached Figure 21 -1 from AUAR).. A local north/south collector
provides a route through the site. Two collector roads provide access to 20th Ave. on
the west of the site. The north/south collector would continue south to access Main
St., and north to future developments. The concept plan also shows an internal local
circulation network providing access for the residential development areas.
The AUAR recognizes the importance of managing access to major transportation
infrastructure. Collector and arterial roads will not function well if new road
intersections and driveways are allowed without an overall plan. The AUAR follows
access management guidelines with V2 mile spacing between full intersections on 20th
Ave.
The development site does not abut Main St. The pictured collector road would
need to extend 1/4 mile south of the site to access Main St. The Centerville /Lino
Lakes border complicates the situation, as does the undeteimined interchange design.
The location of the access to Main St. is still under consideration.
Main St. is challenging because of the I -35E interchange planning underway
among Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Centerville, and MnDOT. The current front
runner for the interchange design includes a typical diamond with one exception. In
the northwest quadrant of the interchange, the southbound exit ramp forms a new
intersection and continues onto a new local road south of Main St. (see attached
figure). This new local road would run between the existing 21' Ave. and I -35E.
The new signalized intersection on Main St. would be only about 600 feet from 21"
Ave. The latest plan is to convert the 21" Ave. intersection to limit tuming
movements and allow westbound Main St. traffic to flow freely from the exit ramp to
20th Ave. The 20th Ave. intersection will be signalized.
All this means that the location of 21" Ave. north of Main St. is an important
consideration. The road design does not need finalization as part of the
comprehensive plan amendment approval. However, the road design must fulfill the
traffic needs.
A traffic study has resulted in a recommendation that running a new road from
Main St. north to the Hardwood Creek development on the west side of the existing
bank and would be an acceptable alternative. This road would provide access to the
north. However, there are a number of considerations that will need to be addressed
with site design: enough stacking distance and the level of service near the
interchange, Anoka County's view of access in the area, including spacing of
signalized intersections, access to properties within Centerville, and water and
sanitary sewer trunk alignment to serve the project. The new road might end up being
a right in/right out only, with primary access to the site from 20th Ave. It could also
end up aligning with the existing 21" Ave.
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 12
These questions will apply whether or not the comprehensive plan is amended and
no matter how the site is developed. The point is that there are alternatives for
creating accesses to the site. The details will have to be worked out at part of the
PUD review.
3) General Location and Extent of Public and Common Open Space.
The concept plan includes an extensive open space network. The open space is to
include stormwater management features, parkland, and trails combined into a large
greenway system.
Several branches of the county ditch system lay in tiles crossing the site.
However, many drain tiles that are not part of the ditch system were placed on the
site over the years to drain the land for agriculture. Much of the potential for
incorporating conservation development elements into the development lies with the
stouuwater management design. Utilizing infiltration to the greatest extent possible
will be important, as will accommodating the flow currently carried by the numerous
drain tiles.
The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan includes trail
connections to be created on the site. The concept plan includes these and more to
facilitate walking and biking within the site and to connect to trails outside the site.
The greenway system would utilize the pipeline easement as part of the trail network.
4) General Location of Residential and Non - Residential Land Uses with Approximate
Type and Intensities of Development.
Single family and multi- family residential areas are shown on the concept plan.
Housing will cover approximately 150 to 170 acres. Commercial uses in the
southeast portion of the site will comprise 55 to 70 acres. The following table is
taken from the concept plan of August 2005.
Total
363 acres
Commercial
500,000 to
600,000 sf
55 to 70 acres
Residential
Single family
400 to 420 units
Multi - family
800 to 830 units
1200 to 1250 units
150 to 170 acres
Open Space
80 to 95 acres
Public Right of Way
55 acres
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 13
5) A Staging and Time Schedule of Development.
The submittal includes a phasing plan. The site would develop from south to
north, with over half the commercial development and some residential in phase one.
Phase two would include the rest of the commercial area and a large amount of
residential. Phases three and four would continue the residential development. The
developer envisions full build out of the site over six years.
6) Other Special Criteria for Development.
The AUAR has not yet been completed. Much of the project design will depend
on the AUAR, particularly the mitigation plan.
In addition, several roadway issues must be resolved. These include the design of
the I -35E interchange and the final design for the intersection at 21St Ave. and Main
St.
Timing will be another important aspect of this development. Transportation
infrastructure is needed to support a development of this size. In addition,
improvements to the water and sanitary sewer infrastructure will be needed to support
full build out of the project. The extent and timing of site development will rely
heavily upon these issues. The City Engineer's memo is attached.
What can be seen in the concept plan is an extensive open space /greenway
network. This will provide for trail connections, stormwater treatment, buffering
from the freeway, and the potential for wildlife habitat.
Though we don't have design details, the developer is including many
conservation development elements in the site design. We'll see more with the PUD
application. We are encouraged and support the efforts so far.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board discussed the application on August 31. Because this is not an
actual plat application with specifics, the Board's recommendation is general: "The
Environmental Board supports the general environmental direction of the Village of
Hardwood Creek, realizing that there is a lot more to be done."
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The EDAC discussed the application on October 6th. EDAC unanimously recommended
that the City Council approve the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to mixed use.
EDAC also unanimously recommended that the City Council support the Planned Unit
Development concept plan, utilizing the Conservation Development Framework outlined
in the AUAR recommendations.
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Village of Hardwood Creek
page 14
Members' message to the City Council is that EDAC supports this development as an
economic benefit to the city, but that the development should be held to Conservation
Development standards. Public benefits such as pedestrian access between the
commercial and residential development, trail access to areas outside the development,
and appropriate recreational amenities for the residents living in the development are
elements of the final plan that should be required as the development moves forward
through the approvals process.
OPTIONS
i. Resolution 05 -153, Comprehensive Plan Amendment
1. Approve Resolution 05 -153 approving amendment of the comprehensive plan.
2. Deny Resolution 05 -153.
ii. PUD concept plan
Provide comment on the PUD concept plan.
RECOMMENDATION
i. Resolution 05 -153: Option 1
ii. PUD concept plan: Provide comment on the PUD concept plan.
It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not
grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design
specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD review.
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO AMEND THE PROPOSED LAND USE MAP, REQUEST 370 ACRES
OF MUSA, AND AMEND TEXT
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has adopted a Comprehensive Plan to guide
community growth in a rational and responsible manner through 2020; and
WHEREAS, MN Statutes 462.355 authorizes the governing body to amend the
comprehensive municipal plan; and
WHEREAS, the City received and application for a comprehensive plan amendment for
363+ acres for a site located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.);
and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on
September 14th and 27th, 2005 and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan
amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan:
The Proposed Land Use Plan is amended to guide the area of approximately 370 acres
to Mixed Use, as shown on the attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use
Plan (Detail)" (Exhibit A).
The amendment includes 370 acres of MUSA for the subject area. This MUSA is
applied to the site, not included in the MUSA reserve. The resulting MUSA line is
shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map (Exhibit A).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the text of the Comprehensive Plan is amended as
shown in Exhibit B.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the application for a
comprehensive plan amendment fulfills the following criteria, which are listed both for
exceeding the 147 annual units statement and the Mixed Use section:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such
as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations
designated for them in the comprehensive plan
•
There are two specific goals that relate to this application in the Policy Plan
section of the comprehensive plan:
1. Provide a healthy variety of housing types, styles and choices to meet the
changing life cycle needs of the Lino Lakes Population.
3. Promote multiple family housing alternatives as an attractive life cycle
housing option.
The application will amend the plan to designate the site for multi - family as well
as single family development.
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially
feasible without the project
The AUAR lays out a transportation framework to guide future planning. This
includes a local roadway system within development areas to avoid relying
entirely on CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 for traffic movement. The system framework
provides access to areas within the application site as well as to land north of the
site. This roadway system is vital to good transportation planning in the eastern
part of Lino Lakes. Development in the area will construct these streets and by
doing so build a major part of the needed transportation system as part of one
project. Smaller developments would not be able to create the system. and the
City will not be able to construct these streets.
In addition, Anoka County has identified the need to improve CSAH 21 to handle
projected traffic volumes. This project will provide resources to make significant
improvements to CSAH 21 because improvements will be needed in order for this
project to proceed.
The utilities (water and sanitary sewer) that will be constructed with this project
will include trunk lines planned to serve other property. Like the road system,
this will provide a large piece of the utility systems needed in this part of the city.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the application for a
comprehensive plan amendment complies the following performance standards, which
are required for development in areas guided for Mixed Use:
1. The and use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses in the
area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping,
and site access.
The concept plan includes residential areas across from existing residential and
areas guided residential on the west side of CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). The concept
- 50 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 2
•
•
includes commercial development abutting land to the south guided for
commercial use. Specifics will be reviewed with a development application.
2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient
traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design
elements for access to arterial and collector roadways.
The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR). The concept plan includes the collector roads and access points
laid out in the AUAR. This layout is intended to observe access management
guidelines and provide for safe, efficient movement.
3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available.
Water and sanitary sewer is available to the site and will be extended to serve the
site and land beyond.
4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning,
landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management.
Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water
quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods
whenever feasible.
The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR). The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the
mitigation plan that the Conservation Development Framework is a fundamental
precept for all development within the AUAR area. Every project can and must
incorporate conservation development design and /or low impact development
techniques.
5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to
residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer
friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses
and between businesses and residents.
The concept plan includes a greenway system and interconnectivity. The details
of the site design will be reviewed with a development application.
6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing,
high quality buildings and streetscapes.
The details of the site design will be reviewed with a development application to
ensure compliance with this standard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this amendment of the comprehensive plan is
subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council, as required by MN Statute
473.
- 5 1 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 3
•
•
•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment
does not grant or imply any right to an approval of a planned unit development,
preliminary plat, or other development application that may follow.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of
2005.
ATTEST:
Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 5 2 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 4
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LOW
DENSITY
SEVERED
RESID.
MED.
RESID.
LOW DENSITY.
UNSEWERED RES, I
•
•
•
EXHIBIT B, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
• The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land
Use Plan chapter, on page 97:
MIXED USE
The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The
Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a
variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the
same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might
include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development,
as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development
project in a Mixed Use area could include only.one type of and use, other land
use designations are available for development with only one type of and use.
Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the
flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not
require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred
design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will
pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be
reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review.
Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than
residential development, which raises stormwater management design
challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed
Use land use designation envisions varied land uses, and recognizes the
possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These
can best be addressed with extensive environmental review.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and
development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes
clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited
to:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without the project
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without the
project
•
•
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without the
project
Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following
performance standards:
1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses
in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition,
landscaping, and site access.
2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and
convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access
management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways.
3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available.
4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site
planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water
management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect
and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and
other natural methods whenever feasible.
5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility,
connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space
to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of
interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents.
6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically
pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes.
West Side of 1 -35E
A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E
and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and
residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to
600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety
of single family and multi - family residential development will include
approximately 1200 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be
approximately 4.5 units per acre, when including all land not within the
commercial area. While these are the approximate use parameters, the specifics
of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit
development approach.
In the northeast corner of the site, a triangle is formed by I -35E, a pipeline, and
the property boundary. This area could be designed to accommodate an office
campus type use, which could be a suitable and use along the freeway. This
would reduce the amount of residential land noted above and increase the
commercial land. Such flexibility is appropriate to accommodate what will be
determined as the best use of the triangle area.
- 5 5 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, Exhibit B, page 2
•
•
This site is included in the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review
(AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation
plan that forms a part of the AUAR, which includes the Conservation
Development Framework as the fundamental precept for all development within
the AUAR area.
This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan
in 2005. This amendment was intended to fulfill the City's growth management
policy requirement that amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required
if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for
new growth (units /year) would be exceeded.
• The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District
6 section, on page 153:
West Side of I -35E
A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and
CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential
uses. This site is described in the Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter.
The specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit
development approach.
• The policy on page 27 of the comprehensive plan is amended to read as follows:
9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year
supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public
purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The
City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development
project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may
include but is not limited to:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without exceeding the target
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without
exceeding the target
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without
exceeding the target
- 56 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, Exhibit B, page 3
•
•
Figure 1
Site Location
•
•
s
Figure 2
LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
- :.:, - - --- .. U RAL
LOW
DENSITY
SEWERED
RESID '1
LOW DENSILY_I
UNSEWERED.RESID:
LOW DENSITY
SEWERED_
RESID; ``"
INDUSTRIAL al
■
COMMERCIAL
•
Figure 3
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN
(DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1,1
LOW INDUSTRIAL
FESID.
DENSITY ,..4.7c..0..5-1
SEWERED
RESID
LOW DENSITXI
• UNSEINERED RESID:
•
LOW DENSITY
SEWERED
RESID.
g
:77 s
L A
:.1
14s1"7 ?!17.71 —"Aiggzed.
COMMERCIAL
•
•
•
Figure 4
ZONING MAP DETAIL
aki
RURAL
a__
i
tl
s r�� I I o,
COMMERCIAL
•
•
•
Figure 5
AUAR Figure 21 -1: Existing and Proposed
Transportation Network
IdaE
Eating and Prnposead
SITE
Figure 21 -1.
Existing and Proposed Transpartation Network
•
•
Figure 6
1-35E at Anoka CSAH ! 14
Interchange Concepts
Villa/i
ge
of Hardwood Creek Site
I -35E
CSAH14.
0
Prepared by SRF April 29, 2005
CONCEPT 2
Dimond plus
northwest loop
• AGENDA ITEM 6B
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 011/14/05
TOPIC: Resolution No. 05 -178 Approving the Assignment and
Release of Certain Obligations under the Contract for
Private Development with Hartford Development, Inc.
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City Council and the Economic Development Authority entered into a
Contract for Private Development with the Hartford Group on December 20,
2004, (amended on September 13, 2005) setting forth the terms and conditions
of redevelopment for Legacy at Woods Edge.
The Contract acknowledges that Hartford Group plans to sell certain portions of
the development property to subdevelopers, and requires that any proposed
subdeveloper assume all the obligations of the developer for the portion of the
property being transferred. The subdeveloper must agree to be subject to all the
conditions and restrictions of the Contract, including the construction of minimum
improvements on the site.
This action releases the Hartford Group from the conditions that will be assumed
by the subdeveloper (GCI Builders, Inc.) for the Country Inn & Suites site. This
release will be delivered upon approval of the site development agreement with
the Country Inn & Suites developer.
The EDA acted earlier this evening on the assignment and release.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 05 -178 Approving the Assignment and Release
of Certain Obligations for the Country Inn & Suites site under the contract
with Hartford Group.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 05 -178
3. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -178
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE OF CERTAIN
OBLIGATIONS UNDER CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
( "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority ( "Authority ") currently
administers Development District No. 1 (the "Project)" pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.124 to 469.134 ( "Development District Act ").
1.02. The Authority, the City, and Hartford Development, Inc. (the "Developer ") entered
into a into a Contract for Private Development dated December 20, 2004, as amended by a First
Amendment thereto dated September 13, 2005 (the "Contract "), setting forth the terms and
conditions of redevelopment of certain property within the Project, referred to generally as the
Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.03. The Developer and Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC (the "Development Property Owner ")
have determined need to assign certain obligations under the Contract to CGI Builders, Inc. (the
"Successor Developer ").
1.04. The Council has reviewed an Approval of Assignment and Release of Obligations
under Contract for Private Development, County Inn & Suites Hotel, between the Authority, the
City, the Developer and the Successor Developer (the "Assignment "), and finds that the execution
thereof is in the best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. City Approval: Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Assignment as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved,
subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by
the Mayor and City Administrator, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall
be conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
City the Assignment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority,
and to carry out, on behalf of the City its obligations thereunder.
SJB- 270695v1
LN 140 -80
- 6 4 -
•
•
•
2005.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 14th of November,
ATTEST:
City Clerk
S.JB- 267750v1
LN 140 -80
7
- 6 5 -
Mayor
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 011/14/05
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving
the Release of Obligations under the Contract for
Subdivision /Planned Unit Development with Hartford
Development, Inc.
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City Council entered into a Contract for Subdivision /Planned Unit
Development with the Hartford Group on December 21, 2004, setting forth the
terms and conditions of redevelopment for Legacy at Woods Edge.
Hartford Group plans to sell a portion of the development property to GCI
Builders, Inc., for the construction of a Country Inn & Suites and has asked to be
released from the terms and conditions of the contract as to the subject parcel.
The city has approved the Country Inn & Suites site plan, and as a condition of
approval before any construction begins, GCI Builders will be required to enter
into a development agreement with the city, containing the same terms and
conditions as the original Hartford Contract.
This action releases the Hartford Group from the conditions that will be assumed
by GCI Builders, Inc. This release will be delivered upon approval of the site
development agreement with the Country Inn & Suites developer.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving the Release of Obligations for
Subdivision /PUD Contract with Hartford Group.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 05 -179
3. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -179
RESOLUTION APPROVING RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
CONTRACT FOR SUBDIVISION/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT,
INC.
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
( "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.02. The City and Hartford Development, Inc. (the "Developer ") entered into a into a
Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit Development dated December 21, 2004, (the "Subdivision
Contract "), setting forth the terms and conditions of redevelopment of certain property referred to
generally as the Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.02. The Developer and Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC (the "Development Property Owner ")
have determined to convey one of the parcels subject to the Subdivision Contract to CGI Builders,
Inc. (the "Successor Developer ").
1.03. In connection with that conveyance, Developer seeks to be released from its
obligations under the Subdivision Contract, subject to certain terms.
1.04. The Council has reviewed a Release of Obligations under Contract for
Subdivision/Planned Unit Development, County Inn &Suites Hotel, between the City, the
Developer and the Successor Developer (the "Release ") and finds that the execution thereof is in the
best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. City Approval: Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Release as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject to
modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the Mayor
and City Administrator, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be
conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
City the Release and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to
carry out, on behalf of the City its obligations thereunder.
SJB- 270697v1
LN 140 -80
-67-
• 2005. Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 14th of November,
•
•
ATTEST:
City Clerk
SJB- 267750v1
LN 140 -80
7
- 6 8 -
Mayor
•
•
RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
CONTRACT FOR SUBDIVISION/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
I. Recital.
1.1
COUNTRY INN & SUITES HOTEL
The Effective Date of this Agreement is , 2005.
1.2 The Parties to this Agreement are City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "City "), Hartford Development, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation ( "Master Developer ") and CGI Builders, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
( "Successor Developer ").
1.3 City and Master Developer are parties to a Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit
Development relating to the Legacy at Woods Edge master development between Developer and
the City with an effective date of dated December 21, 2004, and recorded December 29, 2004, as
Document No. 1971748.007 in the Office of the Anoka County Recorder (the "Contract ").
1.4 Various real estate parcels are subject to the Contract and Successor Developer
has entered into an agreement with Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, an affiliate of Master Developer,
to purchase one of the parcels subject to the Contract for the purpose of developing a hotel (the
"Hotel Development "). Such parcel is legally described as:
Lot 4, Block 1, The Village No. 4, Anoka County, Minnesota
(the "Subject Parcel ")
1.5 In connection with the acquisition of the Subject Parcel, and pursuant to Section
18(G) of the Contract, Master Developer has requested that Master Developer, the Subject Parcel
and the Successor Developer be released from the terms and conditions of the Contract as to the
Subject Parcel.
1.6 The City has approved the Subject Parcel for use consistent with the proposed
Hotel Development. As a condition of its approval, and prior to the commencement of any
construction or land disturbance activity on the Subject Parcel, Successor Developer will enter
into a Development or Site Performance agreement with the City, containing terms and
•
•
•
conditions appropriately replacing the terms and conditions of the Contract. On that basis, City
is willing to release Master Developer from the terms and conditions of the Contract subject to
Master Developer's acknowledgement of its continuing obligations as to other parcels that
remain subject to the Contract.
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
II. Agreement.
2.1 Because City has approved the Hotel Development as set forth above, City agrees
that:
(a) The Subject Parcel is released from the Contract and therefore the
Contract no longer encumbers the Subject Parcel.
(b) Successor Developer has no liability or obligations under the Contract;
provided however, this Agreement does not release Successor Developer from its
obligations to timely pay City fees and charges due in the ordinary course of development
and building construction.
2.2 Successor Developer will commence and complete the Hotel Development as
approved by the City and comply with the requirements of the Hotel Development or Site
Performance Agreement.
2.3 From and after the effective date set forth above, Master Developer is released
from its obligations under the Contract as to the Subject Parcel subject to the following:
(a) Master Developer remains liable under the Contract as to all other parcels
subject to the Contract that are not released hereby or previously released.
This document drafted by:
Hartford Group, Inc. (FAJ)
1300 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Ave. S.
Bloomington, MN 55431
(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
- 7 0 -
•
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
• 2005, by ,the and
of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota on behalf of said City.
•
Notary Public
, the
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned
Unit Development]
• Dated: , 2005 HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
By:
Keith Gruebele
Its: Chief Financial Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 2005, by , the
Hartford Development, Inc, a Minnesota Corporation on behalf of said Corporation.
day
Notary Public
of
of
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned
Unit Development]
•
Dated: , 2005 GCI BUILDERS, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
By:
Its:
STATE OF )
) ss
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2005,
by , the of GCI Builders, Inc, a Minnesota
corporation on behalf of said corporation.
•
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned
Unit Development]
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 011/14/05
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving
the Release of Obligations under the Contract for
Subdivision /Planned Unit Development with Hartford
Development, Inc.
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City Council entered into a Contract for Subdivision /Planned Unit
Development with the Hartford Group on December 21, 2004, setting forth the
terms and conditions of redevelopment for Legacy at Woods Edge.
Hartford Group plans to sell a portion of the development property to GCI
Builders, Inc., for the construction of a Country Inn & Suites and has asked to be
released from the terms and conditions of the contract as to the subject parcel.
The city has approved the Country Inn & Suites site plan, and as a condition of
approval before any construction begins, GCI Builders will be required to enter
into a development agreement with the city, containing the same terms and
conditions as the original Hartford Contract.
This action releases the Hartford Group from the conditions that will be assumed
by GCI Builders, Inc. This release will be delivered upon approval of the site
development agreement with the Country Inn & Suites developer.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 05 -179 Approving the Release of Obligations for
Subdivision /PUD Contract with Hartford Group.
2. Do not approve Resolution No. 05 -179
3. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -179
RESOLUTION APPROVING RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
CONTRACT FOR SUBDIVISION/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT,
INC.
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
( "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.02. The City and Hartford Development, Inc. (the "Developer ") entered into a into a
Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit Development dated December 21, 2004, (the "Subdivision
Contract "), setting forth the terms and conditions of redevelopment of certain property referred to
generally as the Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.02. The Developer and Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC (the "Development Property Owner ")
have determined to convey one of the parcels subject to the Subdivision Contract to CGI Builders,
Inc. (the "Successor Developer ").
1.03. In connection with that conveyance, Developer seeks to be released from its
obligations under the Subdivision Contract, subject to certain terms.
1.04. The Council has reviewed a Release of Obligations under Contract for
Subdivision/Planned Unit Development, County Inn &Suites Hotel, between the City, the
Developer and the Successor Developer (the "Release ") and finds that the execution thereof is in the
best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. City Approval; Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Release as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject to
modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the Mayor
and City Administrator, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be
conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
City the Release and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to
carry out, on behalf of the City its obligations thereunder.
SJB- 270697v1
LN 140 -80
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 14th of November,
2005.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
SJB- 267750v1
LN 140 -80
2
Mayor
RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER
CONTRACT FOR SUBDIVISION/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
COUNTRY INN & SUITES HOTEL
I. Recital.
1.1 The Effective Date of this Agreement is , 2005.
1.2 The Parties to this Agreement are City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "City "), Hartford Development, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation ( "Master Developer ") and CGI Builders, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
( "Successor Developer ").
1.3 City and Master Developer are parties to a Contract for Subdivision/Planned Unit
Development relating to the Legacy at Woods Edge master development between Developer and
the City with an effective date of dated December 21, 2004, and recorded December 29, 2004, as
Document No. 1971748.007 in the Office of the Anoka County Recorder (the "Contract ").
1.4 Various real estate parcels are subject to the Contract and Successor Developer
has entered into an agreement with Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, an affiliate of Master Developer,
to purchase one of the parcels subject to the Contract for the purpose of developing a hotel (the
"Hotel Development "). Such parcel is legally described as:
Lot 4, Block 1, The Village No. 4, Anoka County, Minnesota
(the "Subject Parcel ")
1.5 In connection with the acquisition of the Subject Parcel, and pursuant to Section
18(G) of the Contract, Master Developer has requested that Master Developer, the Subject Parcel
and the Successor Developer be released from the terms and conditions of the Contract as to the
Subject Parcel.
1.6 The City has approved the Subject Parcel for use consistent with the proposed
Hotel Development. As a condition of its approval, and prior to the commencement of any
construction or land disturbance activity on the Subject Parcel, Successor Developer will enter
into a Development or Site Performance agreement with the City, containing terms and
conditions appropriately replacing the terms and conditions of the Contract. On that basis, City
is willing to release Master Developer from the terms and conditions of the Contract subject to
Master Developer's acknowledgement of its continuing obligations as to other parcels that
remain subject to the Contract.
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
II. Agreement.
2.1 Because City has approved the Hotel Development as set forth above, City agrees
that:
(a) The Subject Parcel is released from the Contract and therefore the
Contract no longer encumbers the Subject Parcel.
(b) Successor Developer has no liability or obligations under the Contract;
provided however, this Agreement does not release Successor Developer from its
obligations to timely pay City fees and charges due in the ordinary course of development
and building construction.
2.2 Successor Developer will commence and complete the Hotel Development as
approved by the City and comply with the requirements of the Hotel Development or Site
Performance Agreement.
2.3 From and after the effective date set forth above, Master Developer is released
from its obligations under the Contract as to the Subject Parcel subject to the following:
(a) Master Developer remains liable under the Contract as to all other parcels
subject to the Contract that are not released hereby or previously released.
This document drafted by:
Hartford Group, Inc. (FAJ)
1300 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Ave. S.
Bloomington, MN 55431
(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
2
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2005, by , the and , the
of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota on behalf of said City.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision/Planned
Unit Development]
3
Dated: , 2005 HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
By:
Keith Gruebele
Its: Chief Financial Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2005, by , the of
Hartford Development, Inc, a Minnesota Corporation on behalf of said Corporation.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision/Planned
Unit Development]
4
Dated: , 2005 GCI BUILDERS, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
) ss
By:
Its:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2005,
by , the of GCI Builders, Inc, a Minnesota
corporation on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
[Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned
Unit Development]
5
•
AGENDA ITEM 6D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 11/14/05
TOPIC: Ordinance No. 11 -05: Second Reading offering the
sale of a parcel of land to the Chain of Lakes YMCA
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND:
On June 16, 2005 the City Council entered into a development agreement with
the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, wherein the City agreed to convey the 6.72 -
acre parcel of land in the Legacy at Woods Edge project for the construction of a
YMCA. According to the City Charter, a conveyance of city -owned land must be
done by ordinance. The ordinance will be in effect 30 days after its publication in
the local newspaper.
The YMCA has submitted a site plan for City approval. The details of the
• financing arrangements will be brought to the City Council in December.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 11 -05
2. Do not approve the Ordinance
3. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 11 -05
AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE OF A PARCEL OF LAND
BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES
The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
I.
The City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") and the YMCA of Greater St. Paul ( "YMCA ")
entered into a Development Agreement dated June 16, 2005 (the "Development
Agreement "). The Development Agreement provided, among other things, for the
conveyance, under certain terms and conditions, of certain property owned by the City
described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, The Village No. 3
(the "Property "). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no
longer needed by the City for any public purpose, and that it is the best interest of the City
to convey the Property to the YMCA subject to the terms of this ordinance and the
Development Agreement.
II.
The city council of the City authorizes sale of the property to the YMCA, subject to any
additional terms and conditions of the Development Agreement. The mayor and city
clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents as may be necessary in
order to sell the Property in accordance with this ordinance and the Development
Agreement. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the
requirements of the city charter.
•
•
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its
publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter.
ATTEST:
Jean Viger, City Clerk
John Bergeson, Mayor