Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/23/2011 Council Packet40 EXPANDED AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA O F Monday, May 23, 2011 * * * * * * * * * ** = 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Gallup, Roeser & Rafferty City Administrator: Jeff Karlson COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 5:30 P.M. Community Room (not televised) 1) Update on Arnt Construction Permit Application 2) Update on Zoning Complaint from May 9 Open Mike 3) Update on Engineering RFP's Review Regular Agenda CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M. D Call to Order — 6:35 p.m. D Roll Call - Council Members O'Donnell, Roeser, Gallup & Rafferty, and Mayor Reinert were present D Pledge of Allegiance D Open Mike / Public Comment No public comment D Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items The agenda was not amended 1. CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) May 23, 2011 (Check No. 90727 through 90827) in the amount of $252,094.40; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 4818 through 4834) in the amount of $59,892.04 Pg 1 -16 B) Consider approval of May 2, 2011 Work Session Minutes Pg 17 -22 C) Consider approval of May 9, 2011 Council Meeting Minutes Pg 22a Council Member O'Donnell absent Council Agenda -2- May 23, 2011 EXPANDED AGENDA D) Consider approval of April 25, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes Pg 23 -24 E) Consider approval of May 9, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes Pg 25 -26 Council Members O'Donnell and Rafferty absent F) Consider Resolution No. 11 -54, Approving a special event Pg 26a permit and temporary liquor license for American Legion Post 566 Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Gallup, to approve Consent Items 1A, 1B 1D & 1F, was adopted Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Roeser, to approve Consent Item 1C, was adopted; Council Member O'Donnell abstained from voting Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Gallup, to approve Consent Items 1E, was adopted; Council Member O'Donnell and Rafferty abstained from voting FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, Al Rolek No report ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, Dan Tesch No report PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, John Swenson No report PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, Rick DeGardner No report 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, Michael Grochala A) Consider Resolution No. 11 -49, Preliminary Approval of Revised Pg 27 -61 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council, Jeff Smyser Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by Gallup, to approve Resolution No. 11 -49 as presented, was adopted B) Consider Resolution No. 11 -53, Accepting Report for Pg 62 -66 Redevelopment Task Force, Mary Divine Action Taken: Motion by Roeser, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve Resolution No. 11 -53 as presented, was adopted C) Consider Resolution No. 11 -52, Ordering Report on Improvement, Pg 66a Otter Lake Road Extension Project, Mike Grochala Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Roeser, to approve Resolution No. 11 -52 as presented, was adopted Council Agenda -3- May 23, 2011 EXPANDED AGENDA D) Consider Resolution No. 11 -50, Accepting Quotes and Awarding Pg 67 -70 a Contract for Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement, James Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Gallup, to approve Resolution No. 11 -50 as presented, was adopted E) Consider Resolution No. 11 -51, Establishing Lilac Street as Pg 71 -72 a Municipal State Aid Street, James Studenski. Action Taken: Motion by Gallup, seconded by Roeser, to approve Resolution No. 11 -51 as presented, was adopted 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 8. NEW BUSINESS None Adjournment Action Taken: Motion by Rafferty, seconded by Gallup, to adjourn at 7:00 p.m., was adopted Community Calendar- A Look Ahead May 24, 2011 through June 13, 2011 4. Wednesday, May 25 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board Thursday, June 2 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 4. Monday, June 6 5:30 pm, Community Room Council Work Session Wednesday, June 8 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Bd 4. Monday, June 13 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting • • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, May 23, 2011 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Gallup, Roeser & Rafferty City Administrator: Jeff Karlson COUNCIL WORK SESSION, 5:30 P.M. Community Room (not televised) 1) Update on Amt Construction Permit Application 2) Update on Zoning Complaint from May 9 Open Mike 3) Update on Engineering RFP's Review Regular Agenda CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6:30 P.M. ➢ Call to Order and Roll Call ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Open Mike / Public Comment ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) May 23, 2011 (Check No. 90727 through 90827) in the amount of $252,094.40; B) Consider approval of May 2, 2011 Work Session Minutes C) Consider approval of May 9, 2011 Council Meeting Minutes to follow D) Consider approval of April 25, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes E) Consider approval of May 9, 2011 Board of Appeal Minutes Council Members O'Donnell and Rafferty absent FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, Al Rolek No report ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, Dan Tesch No report PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, John Swenson No report PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, Rick De Gardner No report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, Michael Grochala A) Consider Resolution No. 11 -49, Preliminary Approval of Revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council, Jeff Smyser B) Consider Resolution No. 11 -53, Accepting Report for Redevelopment Task Force, Mary Divine C) Consider Resolution No. 11 -52, Ordering Report on Improvement, Otter Lake Road Extension Project, Mike Grochala to follow D) Consider Resolution No. 11 -50, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Contract for Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement, James Studenski. E) Consider Resolution No. 11 -51, Establishing Lilac Street as a Municipal State Aid Street, James Studenski. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS None Adjournment Community Calendar - A Look Ahead May 24, 2011 through June 13, 2011 Wednesday, May 25 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board Thursday, June 2 8:00 am, Community Room EDAC 4. Monday, June 6 5:30 pm, Community Room Council Work Session Wednesday, June 8 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Bd 4. Monday, June 13 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting Julie Bartell From: Michael Grochala Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:31 AM To: 'cartier52 @yahoo.com' Cc: Julie Bartell Subject: Zoning Complaint Mr. Cartier: I am just following up on the zoning complaint you brought forward to the City Council on May 9th. A review of the problem has been completed by city staff and forwarded to the City Attorney to commence enforcement action. This may still take several months as we work through the legal process, but I wanted you to know the issue is being addressed. If you have any questions please contact me. Thank you Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 651 - 982 -2427 651 - 982 -2499 fax michael.grochala @ci.lino- lakes.mn.us i CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1. MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 2011 TO: City Council FROM: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director RE: City Engineering Services - Supplemental Information Request Interviews for the three engineering firm finalists were held on April 18, 2011. Following discussion the council requested a more direct comparison between the fees included in the respective proposals. Accordingly each firm was presented with the attached supplemental information request. The information request included a detailed list of tasks, general hours worked, based on past experience, and the minimum position requirements expected to complete the assigned tasks. Each firm was asked to list the personnel assigned to perform these tasks and the hourly rate charged for each of the personnel assigned. For the purposes of the request firms were told to assume 900 hours for each position. Firms were informed that no retainer system or monthly rates would be accepted for the purposes of this exercise. Responses were due by Friday, May 20, 2011. Each firm has submitted a response, which is enclosed for your review. Also enclosed is a table which summarizes the responses and the expected expenditures based on the provided rates and expected hours. Each firm has also included methods of minimizing or reducing fees. Many of the ideas are valid approaches that will need to be reviewed regardless of the selected firm. Please note that the submitted data is considered private until the process has been completed. Council may discuss the information in a public meeting but it cannot be distributed. Staff is requesting council direction on how you would like to proceed in the selection process. Enclosures Supplemental Questionnaire Firm Responses (3) Summary of Responses May 12, 2011 Todd Blank, SEH, Inc. Jim Studenski, TKDA Jason Wedel, WSB RE: City Engineering General Service Rates VIA E -MAIL Proposers: As you are aware the City Council is still reviewing the proposals for City Engineering services. As a result of the interview process the council has requested a more direct comparison of engineer fees associated with the expected tasks. For consistency in the proposals, the attached exhibit lists the tasks that are considered to be included in General Engineering Services. Based on extensive past experience these tasks have annually taken approximately 1,800 hours, billed on an hourly basis, to complete. For the purpose of determining costs; it is assumed that 900 hours will require a licensed engineer with extensive municipal experience; the other 900 hours can be performed by an engineering technician or graduate engineer. Accordingly please provide the following information: 1. List the two personnel that you propose to be assigned to perform these tasks. 2. The hourly rate charged for each of the personnel assigned. To determine the estimated total cost, the city will multiply each of the two hourly rates provided by 900 hours then total. 3. Provide rates for reimbursable expenses not included in the hourly rates. The city recognizes that some of the tasks may involve the use of specialists. The use of a specialist i.e., traffic engineer, is in addition to the above referenced hours. It is assumed that such personnel will be billed on an hourly basis. For accountability purposes, no retainer system or monthly rates will be accepted. All submittals should be returned to my attention no later than Friday, May 20, 2011. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 5014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 a Fax: 651- 982 -2499 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes General Engineering Services State Aid System Updates. Perform all responsibilities related to maintain the City's Municipal State Aid Street system. Duties include but are not limited to performing annual mileage certification, mapping updates, and completing all Mn /DOT administrative requirements, and coordinating traffic counts. Constituent Requests. Responds to constituent generated complaints /requests including but not limited to infrastructure repair needs, traffic issues, and city policy questions. Performs field inspections as necessary. Responds personally and in writing. Coordinates corrective actions with Public Services Department. Pavement Management. Administers and implements City's pavement management system. Responsibilities include but are not limited to inspection and rating of municipal streets (25% of mileage annually), updating of management software data, and developing 5 year street improvement projections. Interagency Communication. Attends meetings with adjacent cities, state agencies, county and watershed management organizations. Reviews policy changes, technical reports and improvement proposals. Attends agency meetings as necessary. Serves as City representative for state, county, watershed or adjacent jurisdiction improvement projects GIS /GPS. Prepares and assembles record plan information and coordinates mapping updates with City's GIS consultant (SEH). Prepares GIS maps as necessary. Develops data dictionaries for use with handheld Trimble GPS unit. Performs data downloads and processing of data collected. Infrastructure Maintenance Review. Responds to public service department requests associated with repair and maintenance of public infrastructure. Provides recommendations for corrective measures. NPDES /Surface Water Management. Assists with the preparation, administration and implementation of the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), including annual report preparation, public meetings, and ordinance /policy development and annual inspections. Capital Improvement Programming (CIP). Assists with the development of the City's five year CIP. Identifies and recommends infrastructure improvements for incorporation into City plan. Prepares planning level cost estimates as needed. City Meetings. Attends City meetings as follows: Regular City Council: 24 meetings (twice monthly) © approximately 2 hrs per meeting Council Work Session: 12 meetings (monthly) @ approximately 2 hrs per meeting Planning & Zoning Board: 12 meetings (monthly) at approximately 2 hrs per meeting. Engineer may also attend special meetings of the council and or other advisory boards such as Environmental Board and Park Board. Attends weekly department meetings and preliminary meetings regarding development projects. Flood Plain Management. Responds to constituents information requests related to flood plain location. Includes preparation of elevation certificates (if required), research and review of grading plans and site inspections. Building Permit Reviews. Reviews residential building permit surveys for consistency with approved grading and drainage plans. Performs foundation elevation survey to insure low floor elevations are consistent with approved plans. Reviews residential as- built surveys prior to final inspection. (Note: Commercial, Industrial and Institutional review and inspection is covered under separate development specific escrow agreement.) Utilities. Responsible for determining annual fee adjustments to trunk utility fees based on ENR cost index. Responds to inquiries regarding connection to municipal services. Administers assessment determination process for connection to existing city utilities. Provides general preliminary estimates for minor extensions of infrastructure to service individual locations. Updates pending assessments and assists finance department with management of assessment roles. General Services. • Assists with management of development escrow accounts • Reviews, evaluates, and develops policies, ordinances and standards as necessary. • Identifies opportunities and assists with funding solutions for infrastructure projects such as grant and loan programs. SEH May 19, 2011 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, MN City Engineering Services SEH No. 115103 As requested, we are responding to your letter dated May 12, 2011 regarding further clarification of City Engineering services and fees. We understand that it is sometimes difficult to compare fees from one firm on an "apples to apples" basis with those from another. Our main goal in serving you is to provide the most efficient services at fair and clear billing rates. Delivering this in a climate of trust represents the value that SEH will bring to the City of Lino Lakes. The primary City Engineering team that we will provide to you consists of: • Todd Blank, PE: City Engineer/Principal in Charge. o Fully experienced City Engineer provides confidence and efficiency. o Principal of SEH ensures full service and accountability with one contact. o Municipal Group Leader provides access to resources. o Proven Street Reconstruction program delivery with cost savings. • Tony Kutzke, PE: Assistant City Engineer. o Experienced Assistant City Engineer provides knowledge and efficiency. o Proven Lino Lakes experience provides confidence. o Masters degree in Publice Infrastructure Systems provides technical competency. We are the primary people that you and your public will rely upon to meet your needs. We will also be assisted directly by our professional staff of more than 150 in this office alone, and by the full capabilities of hundreds more throughout our company. Your needs require effective and efficient solutions, and we will use our combined experience and other support staff to determine the most valuable combination of resources to deliver this for you. The option indicated in your letter is to assume that your General Engineering services require 1800 hours of effort, and that half is performed by the City Engineer and half by the Assistant City Engineer. With proposed billing rates of $120 and $95 per hour respectively, the total fee for these services would be $193,500. SEH will also attend City Council meetings at no charge. With the number of hours you indicated for meeting attendance at the City Engineer billable rate this represents approximately $11,500. This brings the fee for these 1800 hours down to $182,000. This represents an average billable rate of $101 per hour. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.corn 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 651.490.2150 fax Michael Grochala May 19, 2011 Page 2 With Tony's level of experience, capabilities, and our experience working together as a team, we think that his efforts would be more than half of the hours. At a lower hourly billing rate, this would reduce the total fee by up to $10,000. The total fee for these 1800 hours would then be approximately $172,000. This represents an average billable rate of $95 per hour. You also indicated that half the hours should be provided by a licensed engineer with extensive municipal experience and the remaining half could be performed by an engineering technician or graduate engineer. We will also use support staff at lower billable rates where possible to provide more value for you. Assuming the licensed engineer time was split between Tony and I and that the rest of the time was by a graduate engineer or technician at $75 per hour, then the total fee for these 1800 hours would be approximately $153,000. This represents an average billable rate of $85 per hour. Our hourly billing rates include overtime premiums, computer costs, cell phones, and routine copying and postage. Travel mileage is billed out at the IRS rate which is currently $0.51 per mile. Since SEH is located closest to the City of Lino Lakes of the firms you are considering, travel time and cost will be less. In fact if the City Engineer travels directly from home to City Hall there will be no charge for travel time or mileage. Reproductions of reports, plans and specifications are billed at cost and vary by size and type of document. These costs should be very minimal for General Engineering services. In conclusion, for the General Engineering services indicated in your letter, assuming half is by the City Engineer and half by the Assistant City Engineer, the total estimated fees would be approximately $182,000. This is an average billable rate of $101 per hour. In reality, we think that we can provide more value for you by providing a more effective team and reducing the fees for these 1800 hours so it is closer to $150,000, or an average billable rate of $85 per hour. With our goal of working closely with you to provide the right size engineering effort, and with our City Engineering experience in similar Cities, we think the 1800 hours can be significantly reduced to provide even more value for the City of Lino Lakes. We are excited about this opportunity and welcome the chance to review this with you in more detail. Please contact me if you have any questions, need further information, or would like to review this together. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. /irk° 91 3()-1 Todd M. Blank, PE Principal tmb s:\ko\1 \Iinol \connnon \city eng rfp \ce gen service rates Ietter.docx TKDA SIGINEERING -ARCHITECTURE -PLANNING The right time. The right people. The right eompan May 20, 2011 Mr. Michael Grochala City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Re: City Engineering, General Services Rates City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Mr. Grochala: 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com This submittal is in response to your letter, dated May 12, 2011, requesting additional information regarding City Engineering General Services Rates. We understand the challenge of evaluating the many different rates and formats engineering firms use to present their fees and welcome any opportunity to discuss and fully disclose the methodology we use. We understand that the success of the relationship between a city and its professional service providers is inextricably tied to trust and transparency. Experience has shown us that the most cost effective professional city engineering services are those delivered with trust and transparency. The presence of these two qualities will result in the lowest TOTAL cost for the city's infrastructure systems, including their planning, design, construction, and on -going operations and maintenance. As outlined in our proposal, in order to provide our clients with transparency in our billing rates, our hourly rates are based on a 2.90 multiplier applied to the actual wages for each staff and includes all overhead costs. The wages for each staff person are tied to typical industry wages for each job classification and level of experience. By using a multiplier to establish the hourly rates, our profit margin is fixed, so there is no incentive to shift the work to a less experienced employee that produces a higher profit. Our 2011 Schedule of Billing Rates included in our original proposal details the hourly rates of the specific team members that have been serving Lino Lakes for many years. This team consists of a Senior Municipal Engineer with over 20 years of experience, a Licensed Engineer with six years of municipal experience and a Senior Engineering Specialist with over 25 years of experience. Your supplemental request specifically asks for rates for a Licensed Engineer and a Technician and /or Graduate Engineer that could perform the tasks outlined in the request. As an alternative to the highly experienced team currently serving the City, TKDA is open to adjusting our staff and /or our level of services to meet the changing needs of the City. In response to your supplemental request we offer the following adjustments: An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Mr. Michael Grochala City of Lino Lakes City Engineering, General Services Rates May 20, 2011 Page 2 • Ryan Stempski, P.E. — Municipal Engineer (ten years of experience) $99.04 /hour • Eric Klingbeil, E.I.T. — Graduate Engineer (four years of experience) $66.70 /hour • Reimbursable expenses include work related mileage at the current IRS rate of $0.51 /mile. Over the many years of service to the City of Lino Lakes, TKDA has remained flexible and has continuously adjusted the scope of services, meeting coverage, and staff experience levels to better fit the City. All these changes have been made by jointly working with the City Council and staff to ensure that critical systems and issues are covered by the appropriate engineering professionals and that our services remain efficient and cost effective while providing value to the City. During these difficult economic times, TKDA remains committed to this practice. We are open and willing to meet with the City Council to further discuss how our services have evolved over time, how we have continued to make cuts necessary to reduce our services and budgets, and how, through all of this, we have remained a trusted advisor to the City and an advocate for the lowest TOTAL infrastructure system costs for the City. Please contact Jim Studenski at (651) 292 -4503 if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, flak' Jfnes E. Studenski, P.E. Project Manager, Municipal Services John( Jack' W. Gr ftin, P.E. Vice resident, M nicipal Services Al WSB cf As-soda/es. Inc. May 20, 2011 Engineering ■ Planning • Environmental • Construction Mr. Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Re: City Engineering — General Service Rates Dear Mr. Grochala: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763- 541 -4800 Fax: 763 -541 -1700 We are in receipt of your letter dated May 12, 2011, requesting additional information pertaining to our proposed engineering fees. Specifically, you requested the names of the two personnel that will be assigned to perform the tasks outlined in your letter as well as their hourly rates. You also requested the rates for reimbursable expenses not included in the hourly rates. The proposed engineers we included in our proposal to perform a majority of the engineering tasks outlined in your letter are as follows: Jason Wedel, City Engineer Jeremy Koenen, Assistant City Engineer $121 per hour $96 per hour Please be sure to note that all miscellaneous expenses such as copying, mileage, etc., are included in our hourly rates. This is unusual in our industry and can reduce total costs by 3 -5 %, so we hope that you include that in your analysis. We still firmly believe that our original proposal based on a flat fee is in the best interest of the City. Simply comparing hourly rates between engineering firms will not provide the City with the complete picture. We proposed a flat fee purposefully in an effort to drive innovation and performance. We specialize in municipal engineering and can provide the services the City needs more efficiently than anyone else. This contract arrangement is currently being used with our clients in Rosemount, Champlin, and Minnestrista among others. Please do not hesitate to contact these cities and ask them how the flat rate is working for them. After reviewing the tasks outlined in your letter and comparing it to the list of tasks we included in our proposal, there were three additional items on your list. These items are Pavement Management, NPDES /Surface Water Management, and foundation elevation surveys. We recommend modifying our original proposal to include Pavement Management and NPDES /Surface Water Management. The annual fee would, therefore, increase from $62,400 to $72,400 after adding these tasks. Due to the variable nature of foundation elevation surveys, we would recommend completing those separately on an "as- needed" basis at our standard hourly rate shown in our fee schedule. We are confident that either method that you utilize, flat fee or hourly, that WSB will be the most competitive and provide the overall lowest cost. We want you to get a partner that is committed to finding the best long -term solutions. We are willing to provide service using a partial flat fee and partial Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Michael Grochala May 20, 2011 Page 2 hourly fee if that makes you more comfortable. Either way, we are confident that you will be as satisfied as our other clients. If you or the City Council have any further questions, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you in person. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jason C. Wedel, P.E. Proposed City Engineer Brian J. Bourassa, P.E. Proposed Client Advocate Z W n z LL o- L a) 0 c W 2 E U TT3 co cn c a) o - E as a—) E o Q co a) 0 Z No Charge for council meetings Rates exclude mileage Rates include mileage Also proposed retainer $72,400/yr Total o O LO CO a) .1- N Co 1.0 a) CO Co N- 0) .st 0 0 CO Ln a) Subtotal 0 O 00 O O LO L0 CO a) N N- N N- M OO T- O 0) 0 00 Ca O O C) 00 Co O 00 c- Hours 1 0 0 a) 0 O a) 0 0 0 0 a) a) 0 0 0 O (3) a) 0 0 0 O a) 0) Rate I 0 N LO 0) cr) CO co O 0) a) co ti ti O a) Co a) O N 0) Name Tony Kutzke :2 V) U) N w-' a) C E lc= • U L O 12 c o — Q ) E o a) 0) VJ c Y co o A •L CC w Jason Wedel Jeremy Koenen Firm* 1 0 l ) ^] 0 H lm^ v J *Alphabetical Order • EXPENDITURES MAY 23, 2011 P1 Date: 05/16/2011 Time 15:35:22 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Options: Vendor # Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (r) 9383 9387 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank 8: (A) Detail / Summary: s Name Operator: KKF Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: a Check Over Expend: N P2 • Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 753.77 753.77 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 809.00 809.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 2 251.25 251.25 .00 .00 000250 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 440.00 440.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 190.84 190.84 .00 .00 008238 AMY DOMEIER 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 005026 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1 838.10 838.10 .00 .00 000440 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 3,861.49 3,861.49 .00 .00 000421 ANOKA CO TREASURER DEPT 1 1,404.51 1,404.51 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 92.00 92.00 .00 .00 900517 APMP OF MINNESOTA 1 30.00 30.00 .00 00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 1 733.50 733.50 .00 IP 008288 MARTIN AUSTIN 1 8.00 8.00 .00 .00 000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 2 700.00 700.00 .00 .00 000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 3 2,616.28 2,616.28 .00 .00 008293 BIFF'S INC. 8 186.44 186.44 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 1,194.79 1,194.79 .00 .00 000880 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 1 1,065.44 1,065.44 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 2,060.00 2,060.00 .00 .00 000258 CARROLL DISTRIB /CONST SUPPLY, INC. 1 190.24 190.24 .00 .00 008294 CEDAR HILL NATIVES 1 900.00 900.00 .00 .00 001110 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 1 2,358.30 2,358.30 .00 .00 • Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:22 Vendor # Name City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice Journal # of items P' Discount Net Gross Discount Lost •,00 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 1,097.56 1,097.56 .00 .00 008049 COLUMBUS AUTO TRUCK & TRAILER 1 810.36 810.36 .00 .00 004670 COMCAST 2 69.90 69.90 .00 .00 000726 COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE 1 419.05 419.05 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,348.89 3,348.89 .00 .00 900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 3 49,551.07 49,551.07 .00 .00 007409 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING, INC. 1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00 007354 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 1 772.17 772.17 .00 .00 008295 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY 1 42.11 42.11 .00 .00 000413 DAKOTA COUNTY RECEIVING CENTER 1 67.00 67.00 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 2 172.97 172.97 .00 .00 000256 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 1 108.22 108.22 .00 .00 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3 4,650.68 4,650.68 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 2 740.17 740.17 .00 .00 001267 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 118.64 118.64 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 2 30.75 30.75 .00 .00 dia0 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL 1 515.25 515.25 .00 .00 W25 GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPE, INC. 1 1,055.21 1,055.21 .00 .00 001066 GREENLIFE SUPPLY L.L.C. 1 1,436.40 1,436.40 .00 .00 0008283 HARDRIVES, INC. 1 157.47 157.47 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS, INC. 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 008034 HEART & SOUL 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00 001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 595.98 595.98 .00 .00 003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 2 21.40 21.40 .00 .00 007224 HUGO MILL 2 21.32 21.32 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 392.08 392.08 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 15,458.00 15,458.00 .00 .00 • Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:23 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KKF Page: 3 134 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 008292 INSIDE THE TAPE 1 300.00 300.00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 142.50 142.50 .00 .00 000917 KFC 1 179.88 179.88 .00 .00 008291 PATRICIA KIPKA 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 002248 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 1 17,850.00 17,850.00 .00 .00 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 924.00 924.00 .00 .00 008123 LUBE -TECH 2 10,625.08 10,625.08 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 2,506.48 2,506.48 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 98.46 98.46 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 133.00 133.00 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 2 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 007694 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1 60,082.17 60,082.17 .00 .00 007444 MINNESOTA ASSOC OF WOMEN POLICE 1 700.00 700.00 .00 .00 003882 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 2 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 698.47 698.47 .00 .00 002760 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 1 23.00 23.00 .00 .00 008198 NATIONAL PAYMENT CENTER 1 214.01 214.01 .00 007268 PETE NOLL 1 114.28 114.28 .00 . 0 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 2 2,029.40 2,029.40 .00 .00 000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 5 110.20 110.20 .00 .00 000983 OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES 2 83.10 83.10 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 554.20 554.20 .00 .00 003490 PETTY CASH 1 212.84 212.84 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 69.18 69.18 .00 .00 000771 POWER PLAN OIB 1 394.35 394.35 .00 .00 007563 RESTORATION PROFESSIONALS, INC. 1 6,316.56 6,316.56 .00 .00 900491 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF 2 6,720.88 6,720.88 .00 .00 • P! Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:23 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost .910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 214.33 214.33 .00 .00 008296 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE CORP 1 6,479.10 6,479.10 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 171.00 171.00 .00 .00 008297 STACY HARDWARE 1 77.24 77.24 .00 .00 008142 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 1 345.98 345.98 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 2 1,440.88 1,440.88 .00 .00 008195 SWEENEY, MURPHY & SWEENEY, P.A. 1 10,634.98 10,634.98 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 352.50 352.50 .00 .00 008141 TASC 1 84.15 84.15 .00 .00 000489 TDS METROCOM MN 1 986.06 986.06 .00 .00 002790 TESSMAN SEED COMPANY, INC. 1 155.51 155.51 .00 .00 004469 TOUSLEY FORD, INC. 2 323.76 323.76 .00 .00 000423 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. 1 33.17 33.17 .00 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 440.00 440.00 .00 .00 004560 U S BANK VISA 1 4,607.19 4,607.19 .00 .00 008298 UPPER CUT TREE SERVICE 1 2,030.63 2,030.63 .00 .00 •?0 VALLEY -RICH CO., INC. 1 5,418.38 5,418.38 .00 .00 Ou,o72 VENUS CREATIONS, INC. 1 288.56 288.56 .00 .00 007245 JUSTIN WILLIAMS 1 68.00 68.00 .00 .00 008290 HYON KELLEY WILSON 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 2 792.12 792.12 .00 .00 002609 GEORGIA WOLTJER 1 15.30 15.30 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,261.57 2,261.57 .00 .00 008299 ZEPHYR GRAF -X 1 1,130.35 1,130.35 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 136 252,094.40 252,094.40 .00 .00* 11111 Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:23 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Account # Operator: KKF Page: 5 Description Fiscal Debit Credit Main 101- 2040 -000 101 -402- 4310 -000 101 -402- 4322 -000 101 - 402 -4330 -000 101 -402- 4410 -000 101 -402- 4452 -000 101 -406- 4321 -000 101 -407 -4308 -000 101 - 407- 4310 -000 101- 414 - 4303 -000 101- 415 - 4330 -000 101 - 416 - 4452 -000 101 - 418 - 4330 -000 101 -418- 4340 -000 101 - 418 -5000 -000 101- 420- 4200 -000 101 - 420 - 4211 -000 101 - 420 - 4213 -000 101- 420- 4214 -000 101 - 420 - 4321 -000 101- 420 - 4330 -000 101 - 420 - 4370 -000 101 - 420 - 4381 -000 101- 420 - 4410 -000 101 - 422- 4330 -000 101 - 430 - 4211 -000 101- 430 - 4224 -000 101 - 430 - 4229 -000 101 - 430 -4240 -000 101- 430 - 4321 -000 101- 430 - 4370 -000 101 - 430 - 4385 -000 101- 430 - 4410 -000 101- 430 - 4421 -000 101 - 431 - 4212 -000 101 -431- 4221 -000 101 - 431 - 4300 -000 101- 431 - 4322 -000 101 - 432- 4200 -000 101 - 432 - 4211 -000 101 -432- 4321 -000 101- 432 - 4361 -000 101 - 432 - 4381 -000 101 - 432 - 4383 -000 101 -432- 4410 -000 101 - 450- 4211 -000 101 - 450- 4381 -000 101 - 450- 4383 -000 101 - 450- 4410 -000 101 - 450- 4415 -000 101 - 451- 4211 -000 101 - 461 - 4211 -000 101 - 461 - 4410 -000 GENERAL FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 05/2011 2,590.25 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONSULTANT 05/2011 83.10 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE 05/2011 134.23 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TRAVEL /TUITION 05/2011 549.22 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED SERVIC 05/2011 84.15 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPT /DUES 05/2011 174.79 GENERAL SENIORS TELEPHONE 05/2011 37.86 GENERAL FINANCE AUDITOR 05/2011 7,497.00 GENERAL FINANCE OTHER CONSULTANT 05/2011 5,769.58 GENERAL LEGAL CONSULTANTS CRIMINAL ATTOR 05/2011 10,634.98 GENERAL ECONOMIC DEV TRAVEL /TUITION 05/2011 178.00 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD SUBSCR /DUES 05/2011 440.00 COMM DEV TRAVEL /TUITION 05/2011 19.00 GENERAL COMM DEV PRINTING & PUBLISHING 05/2011 14.00 COMM DEV CAPITAL OUTLAY 05/2011 267.80 GENERAL POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 05/2011 9.62 GENERAL POLICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 1,701.41 GENERAL POLICE DARE PROGRAM EXPENSES 05/2011 39.00 GENERAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION 05/2011 124.43 GENERAL POLICE TELEPHONE 05/2011 674.42 GENERAL POLICE TRAVEL /TUITION 05/2011 1,000.00 GENERAL POLICE UNIFORMS 05/2011 1,008.21 GENERAL POLICE ELECTRICITY 05/2011 21.37 GENERAL POLICE CONTRACTED SERVICES 05/2011 4,687.64 BUILDING INSPECTIONS TRAVEL 05/2011 15.30 GENERAL STREETS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 164.51 GENERAL STREETS PATHCHING MATERIALS 05/2011 509.97 GENERAL STREETS GRAVEL /MISC 05/2011 456.66 GENERAL STREETS SMALL TOOLS 05/2011 190.24 GENERAL STREETS TELEPHONE 05/2011 37.94 GENERAL STREETS UNIFORMS 05/2011 68.00 GENERAL STREETS STREET LIGHTS 05/2011 1,338.49 GENERAL STREETS CONTRACTED SERVICES 05/2011 1,404.51 GENERAL STREETS CONTRACTED STORM SYSTEM 05/2011 945.00 GENERAL FLEET VEHICLE FUEL 05/2011 10,719.77 GENERAL FLEET SHOP PARTS 05/2011 5,377.26 GENERAL FLEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 05/2011 4,411.19 GENERAL FLEET POSTAGE 05/2011 12.02 GOVER BUILDINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES 05/2011 519.46 GOVER BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 523.68 GOVER BUILDINGS TELEPHONE 05/2011 1,143.98 GOVER BUILDINGS BUILD INS 05/2011 45,942.63 GOVER BUILDINGS ELECTRICITY 05/2011 877.59 GOVER BUILDINGS HEAT 05/2011 2,830.53 GOVER BUILDINGS CONTRACTED 05/2011 5,561.46 GENERAL PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 2,595.64 GENERAL PARKS ELECTRICITY 05/2011 67.33 GENERAL PARKS HEAT 05/2011 251.01 GENERAL PARKS CONTRACTED SERVICES 05/2011 3,272.28 GENERAL PARKS RENTAL EQUIPMENT 05/2011 171.00 GENERAL RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 369.66 GENL ENVIRONMENTAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 454.40 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTED SERVICE 05/2011 1,209.82 PE • • 137 Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:24 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 6 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Account # Description Fiscal Debit Credit • 101 462 -4410 -000 GENERAL SOLID WASTE CONTRACTED SERVICES 05/2011 Fund Total: 201- 200 - 4308 -000 201 - 204- 4211 -817 201 - 205- 4211 -868 201- 205- 4211 -890 201- 207- 4211 -806 201- 207- 4211 -808 201- 207- 4211 -809 201 - 207- 4211 -883 201 - 208 - 4106 -855 201 - 208 - 4211 -855 201- 208 - 4211 -856 201- 3810 -810 201 - 3810 -852 1,189.96 130,371.35 RECREATION PROGRAM REC AUDITOR 05/2011 178.50 RECREATION OTHER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 32.91 RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES- OTHER 05/2011 154.90 RECREATION SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS MAINTENA 05/2011 894.28 RECREATION MAINT SUPPLIES T -BALL 05/2011 514.78 RECREATION MAINT SUPP BASEBALL CAMP 05/2011 196.04 RECR YOUTH INSTR MAINT SUPPL Start Smart 05/2011 257.39 MAINT SUPPL COUGAR SOCCER CMP 05/2011 196.04 TEMPORARIES YOUTH FALL FOOTBALL 05/2011 1,130.35 MAINT SUPP YOUTH FALL FOOTBALL 05/2011 89.33 RECREATION MAINT SUPL YOUTH SOCCER 05/2011 128.08 RECREATION PENNY CARNIVAL /PLAYGROUND 05/2011 10.00 RECREATION KARATE 05/2011 10.00 Fund Total: 3,792.60 .00 .00 301 - 499 - 4308 -000 CLOSED BOND FUND AUDITOR- CONSULTANTS 05/2011 714.00 Fund Total: 714.00 .00 401 - 499- 4308 -000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AUDITOR 05/2011 1,071.00 Fund Total: 1,071.00 .00 402- 420 - 5000-000 POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY 05/2011 4,650.68 • Fund Total: 4,650.68 .00 405- 499 -5002 -000 DEDICATED PARKS OTHER BUILDINGS & IMPROV 05/2011 7,150.00 Fund Total: 7,150.00 .00 406- 499 - 4308 -000 AREA AND UNIT OTHER AUDITOR 05/2011 1,428.00 Fund Total: 1,428.00 .00 422 -499- 4308 -000 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AUDITOR 05/2011 178.50 Fund Total: 178.50 .00 601- 2150 -000 WATER OVERCREDIT HOLDING ACCOUNT 05/2011 8.00 601 - 494- 4211 -000 WATER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 05/2011 6,900.09 • Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:24 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Account # Operator: KKF Page: 7 Description Fiscal Debit Credit 601 - 494 - 4222 -000 WATER OPERATING CHEMICALS 05/2011 65.00 601 - 494 - 4240 -000 WATER OPERATING SMALL TOOLS 05/2011 236.42 601- 494 - 4300 -000 WATER OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 05/2011 10,928.88 601 - 494 -4321 -000 WATER OPERATING TELEPHONE 05/2011 113.06 601 - 494- 4322 -000 WATER OPERATING POSTAGE 05/2011 4.82 601 494- 4381 -000 WATER OPERATING ELECTRICITY 05/2011 2,940.48 601 - 494 - 4383 -000 WATER OPERATING HEAT 05/2011 310.98 601 - 494 -4410 -000 WATER OPERATING CONTRACTED SERVICE 05/2011 257.63 601 - 494- 4452 -000 WATER OPERATING SUBSCRIPTIONS /DUES 05/2011 23.00 Fund Total: 21,788.36 602- 495- 4211 -000 602 -495- 4300 -000 602 - 495- 4381 -000 602 - 495- 4383 -000 602 - 495- 4405 -000 602 -495- 4410 -000 801 - 2023 -000 801 - 2300 -000 801 -2357 -103 Control A/P SEWER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ' 05/2011 35.43 SEWER OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 05/2011 18,797.00 SEWER OPERATING ELECTRICITY 05/2011 365.20 SEWER OPERATING HEAT 05/2011 63.34 SEWER OPERATING MWCC SEWER CHARGES 05/2011 60,082.17 SEWER OPERATING CONTRACTED SERVICE 05/2011 257.62 Fund Total: 79,600.76 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS POLICE DRUG FORFEI 05/2011 CONTRACTOR'S DEP GENERAL FUND ESCROW 05/2011 CONTR DEP CENTURY FARMS NO.3rd Admin 05/2011 Fund Total: Grand Totals: Control Grand Totals: 1,257.15 46.00 46.00 1,349.15 .00 .00 .00 252,094.40 .00 .00 .00 101- 2020 -000 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 129,978.63 201 - 2020 -000 RECREATION ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 3,792.60 301 - 2020 -000 CLOSED BOND FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 714.00 401 - 2020 -000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ACCOUNTS PA 05/2011 1,071.00 402 - 2020 -000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING ACCTS PAY 05/2011 4,650.68 405- 2020 -000 DEDICATED PARKS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 7,150.00 406 - 2020 -000 AREA AND UNIT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 1,428.00 422 - 2020 -000 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS PAYABL 05/2011 178.50 601 - 2020 -000 WATER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 21,788.36 602 - 2020 -000 SEWER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 79,600.76 801- 2020 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05/2011 1,349.15 A/P Grand Totals: .00 251,701.68 Discount PE • • • Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:35:24 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Account # Manual Checks - Cash Operator: KKF Page: 8 Description Fiscal Debit Credit 101 - 1010 -000 GENERAL FUND CASH • • Discount Grand Totals: .00 .00 05/2011 392.72 Cash Grand Totals: .00 392.72 P9 Date: 05/16/2011 Ranges: Time: 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal 8: (R) 9384 - 9389 Bank #: (A) Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1 Page on Department: N Department ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION SENIORS FINANCE FINANCE Vendor Name Description AFSCME COUNCIL #5 MAY 2011 UNION DUES LAW ENFORCEMENT LABO MAY 2011 DUES MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY CHILD SUPPORT NATIONAL PAYMENT CEN GARNISHMENT Total for Department OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIA APRIL 2011 ELIG PLAN PAR OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIA APRIL 2011 RETIREES METROPOLITAN AREA J KARLSON CONFERENCE METROPOLITAN AREA PETTY CASH PETTY CASH U S BANK VISA U S BANK VISA TASC AMY DOMEIER AMY DOMEIER APMP OF MINNESOTA J SWENSON CONFERENCE CPPO- POSTAGE IPMA- MEETING FEE APRIL 2011 CHARGES MCMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 2011 ADMIN FEE J. BARTELL - LICENSING U J. VIGER - LICENSING UPD 2011 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL Total for Department 402 TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES Total for Department 406 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL ROSEVILLE, CITY OF MAY 2011 IT SERVICE CHAR Total for Department 407 LEGAL CONSULTANTS SWEENEY, MURPHY & SW MAY PROSECUTION SERVICES Total for Department 414 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT U S BANK VISA 7TH ANNUAL LAND DEVELOPM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT U S BANK VISA REAL ESTATE MARKETING SU Total for Department 415 PLANNING & ZONING AMERICAN PLANNING AS APA MEMBERSHIP CATEGAROY Total for Department 416 COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV PETTY CASH PETTY CASH U S BANK VISA ANOKA CO -COPY FEES ANOKA CO- SUSPENSE CREDIT 7TH ANNUAL LAND DEVELOPM Amount 753.77 924.00 698.47 214.01 2,590.25* 55.50 27.60 20.00 30.00 134.23 10.00 144.79 479.22 84.15 5.00 5.00 30.00 1,025.49* 37.86 37.86* 7,497.00 5,769.58 13,266.58* 10,634.98 10,634.98* 79.00 99.00 178.00* 440.00 440.00* 2.00 12.00 79.00 • • • Date: 05/16/2011 Time 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount COMM DEV COMM DEV POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE U S BANK VISA ADOBE ACROBAT SOFTWARE U S BANK VISA CREDIT FOR CANCELLED COU Total for Department 418 DAKOTA COUNTY RECEIV ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNM TDS METROCOM MN ASPEN MILLS, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY FAST BREAK CORNER MA FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA METRO SALES INCORPOR OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CA MINNESOTA SHREDDING SAM'S CLUB, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. U S BANK VISA U S BANK VISA U S BANK VISA U S BANK VISA NOLL, PETER CREATIVE PRODUCT SOU MINNESOTA ASSOC OF W HEART & SOUL INSIDE THE TAPE LLC CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY Total for Department 420 267.80 -60.00 300.80* APRIL 2011 DETOX TRANSPO 67.00 1ST QTR 2011 SHARED COST 3,861.49 MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES 674.42 CHIEF STARTUP SUPPLIES 733.50 APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR 21.37 CAR WASHES 23.95 KEYS DOUBLE CUT 3.20 SEMI ANNUALLY CHARGES 133.00 IMPOUND /BOARDING /SERVICE 554.20 SHRED & DESTROY DESIGNAT 48.00 ACE PROGRAM RECEIPT BOOK 9.62 DUTY AMMO 1,367.15 K MCCARTHY UNIFORM ALLOW 73.73 BUSINESS CRIME WATCH 49.43 K STREGE UNIFORM ALLOWAN 86.70 MAINT. SUPPLIES 113.13 RIFLE REPAIR PARTS 175.82 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE REIMBU 114.28 D.A.R.E. SUPPLIES 39.00 49TH ANNUAL TRAINING CON 700.00 HEARTSAVER CARD PROCESSI 75.00 DEATH INVESTIGATION TRAI 300.00 CASH /JEWELRY ENVELOPES 42.11 9,266.10* •ING INSPECTIONS WOLTJER, GEORGIA PERMIT WORKS USER GROUP Total for Department 422 STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET • 15.30 15.30* CARROLL DISTRIB /CONS 4GAL SPRAYER 190.24 ANOKA COUNTY TREASUR 1ST QTR 2011 SIGNAL MAIN 1,404.51 TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES 37.94 HARDRIVES, INC. OMEGA WINTER MIX 157.47 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, CLASS 5 /RED BALL DIAMOND 456.66 CONNEXUS ENERGY APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR 1,088.95 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE HARDWARE 72.78 INFRASTRUCTURE TECHN HIGH PRESSURE CLEANING T 945.00 XCEL ENERGY APRIL 2011 ENERGY CHARGE 249.54 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SO AC FINE ASPHALT 352.50 U S BANK VISA STRAP REPAIR AND NEW STR 91.73 WILLIAMS, JUSTIN CLOTHING ALLOWANCE REIMS 68.00 Total for Department 430 5,115.32* MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, AMERICAN FASTENER & AMERICAN FASTENER & AUTO- MEDICS, INC. REMOVED & REPLACE HOSES SHOP STOCK SWITCHES FOR PLOW HEADLI ELGIN STREET SWEEPER BAC 2,506.48 128.79 27.36 350.00 P11 Date: 05/16/2011 Department FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT Time 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS Description AUTO- MEDICS, INC. BAUER BUILT, INC. BAUER BUILT, INC. BOYER TRUCKS, INC. POWER PLAN OIB O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, FAST BREAK CORNER MA MENARDS, INC. FACTORY MOTOR PARTS FACTORY MOTOR PARTS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTI HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTI PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TOUSLEY FORD, INC. TOUSLEY FORD, INC. U S BANK VISA U S BANK VISA COLUMBUS AUTO TRUCK LUBE -TECH LURE -TECH STACY HARDWARE Total for DEEP ROCK WATER COMP AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APP NORTHERN AIR CORPORA NORTHERN AIR CORPORA TDS METROCOM MN CENTENNIAL UTILITIES BUILDINGS CONNEXUS ENERGY BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. BUILDINGS HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE BUILDINGS HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE BUILDINGS HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE BUILDINGS CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS BUILDINGS PETTY CASH BUILDINGS MINNESOTA SHREDDING BUILDINGS SAM'S CLUB, INC. BUILDINGS TWIN CITY GARAGE DOO BUILDINGS U S BANK VISA BUILDINGS U S BANK VISA BUILDINGS COMCAST Amount ELGIN STREET SWEEPER IN 350.00 FIREHAWK GT PURSUIT -STOC 1,716.37 UNIT # 246 899.91 UNIT 246 MUFFLER /PIPE ES 1,194.79 SHIFTER REPAIR ON W17402 394.35 OIL FILTERS - STOCK 24.83 OIL /FUEL FILTERS - STOCK 17.47 PRESSURE REG - # 367 47.94 RUBBER LUBE - STOCK 13.88 WIPER BLADE - #373 6.08 UNL FUEL 94.69 COIL OXY /NORSK VAN /RESPI 12.77 PAD KIT /ROTORS 547.09 PRO BATT PP54 193.08 17 COMPARTMENT STORAGE B 9.63 POLE RV BLADE TRAILER EN 11.77 FLEET FARM -STOCK SUPPLY 36.83 WALMART -STOCK SUPPLY 11.78 PARTS 25.53 POSTAGE 12.02 MODULE - #326 247.00 STOCK SUPPLIES 76.76 MALL HANDLES, CABLE TIES 33.16 STRAP REPAIR AND NEW STR UNIT 249 REPAIRS 1466.4 GALLONS UNL 1504.2 GALLONS UNL BUTTONS, BELT - #139 Department 431 17.20 810.36 5,299.15 5,325.93 77.24 20,520.24* PUBLIC WORKS WATER /BOTTL 108.22 MONTHLY RUG REPLACEMENT 190.84 BLDG PRESSURE ON HVAC SY 436.00 INSTALL DIFFUSER IN IT R 1,593.40 MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES 122.78 APRIL 2011 GAS USAGE 2,197.59 APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR 877.59 DOME ASHTRAY SABLE 156.47 METAL PLATE 16.50 ELECTRICAL & LIGHTING 31.07 ELECTRICAL /FLOORING 218.11 FLOORING 13.59 MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES 632.94 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19.86 SHRED & DESTROY DISIGNAT 18.00 SUPER HERO BOOT CAMP SUP 124.49 PREVENTATIVE MAINT. ON A 440.00 LAPTOP SPEAKER 48.99 MALL HANDLES, CABLE TIES 68.08 LL CITY HALL INTERNET 34.95 • • P1: Date: 05/16/2011 Time 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report �artment Vendor Name Description Amount GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS COMCAST LL PUBLIC WORKS INTERNET 34.95 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS RESTORATION PROFESSI 1189 MAIN -WATER LEAK REP 6,316.56 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS STAPLES ADVANTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES 345.98 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CRAIG SEVERSON CONST REPAIR ROOF LEAK AT PUBL 2,775.00 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CRAIG SEVERSON CONST WARMING HOUSE FIRE DAMAG 39,626.07 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ROSEVILLE, CITY OF MAY 2011 PHONE CHARGES 951.30 Total for Department 432 57,399.33* PARKS BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, CLASS 5 /RED BALL DIAMOND 608.78 PARKS GREENLIFE SUPPLY L.L FERTILIZER 1,436.40 PARKS CENTENNIAL UTILITIES APRIL 2011 GAS USAGE 143.63 PARKS CONNEXUS ENERGY APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR 67.33 PARKS HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE HARDWARE 16.13 PARKS CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES 107.38 PARKS TESSMAN SEED COMPANY NC REGAKSTAR G - MAINT S 155.51 PARKS ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 171.00 PARKS U S BANK VISA ECO STRIPE WHITE PAINT 357.50 PARKS HUGO MILL KIT CRUISE CONTROL 5.33 PARKS HUGO MILL MAINT. SUPPLIES 15.99 PARKS GREAT NORTHERN LANDS COMMERCIAL SPRING START 1,055.21 PARKS BIFF'S INC. BIRCH PARK /LOCATION 6808 22.93 PARKS BIFF'S INC. CENTENNIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL 12.22 PARKS BIFF'S INC. CITY HALL PARK - LOCATION 22.93 PARKS BIFF'S INC. LINO PARK - LOCATION 68089 22.93 PARKS BIFF'S INC. MARSHAN PARK- LOCATION 68 22.93 PARKS BIFF'S INC. RICE LAKE ELEM SCHOOL EA 12.22 PARKS BIFF'S INC. RICK LAKE ELEM SCHOOL WE 12.22 PARKS BIFF'S INC. SUNRISE PARK - LOCATION 68 58.06 KS UPPER CUT TREE SERVI TREE REMOVAL - CITY PROP 2,030.63 Total for Department 450 6,357.26* RECREATION U S BANK VISA FIRST AID SUPPLIES 176.38 RECREATION U S BANK VISA STRAP REPAIR AND NEW STR 91.73 RECREATION VENUS CREATIONS, INC VARIOUS SIGN FOR EVENTS 101.55 Total for Department 451 369.66* ENVIRONMENTAL U S BANK VISA COMMUNITY GARDENS 413.71 ENVIRONMENTAL U S BANK VISA MATERIALS FOR WOOD DUCK 454.40 ENVIRONMENTAL WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. COMMUNITY GARDEN SUPPLIE 676.83 ENVIRONMENTAL VENUS CREATIONS, INC VARIOUS SIGN FOR EVENTS 119.28 Total for Department 461 1,664.22* SOLID WASTE KFC RECYCLE DAY MEALS 179.88 SOLID WASTE PETTY CASH ANOKA CO -COPY FEES 6.00 SOLID WASTE U S BANK VISA EARTH DAY BAGS 80.56 SOLID WASTE U S BANK VISA EASY TACK - REPOSITIONABLE 7.49 SOLID WASTE U S BANK VISA RECYCLE DAY POSTERS 16.03 SOLID WASTE CEDAR HILL NATIVES BEIGE & GREEN RECYCLED R 900.00 Total for Department 462 1,189.96* • Date: 05/16/2011 Department PROGRAM REC OTHER Time 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Total for Fund 101 WILSON, HYON KELLEY PROGRAM REFUND KIPKA, PATRICIA OVERPAYMENT REFUND Total for Department LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL Total for Department 200 U S BANK VISA SPRING FLING SUPPLIES Total for Department 204 SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS PETTY CASH SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS SAM'S CLUB, INC. SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK VISA SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL YOUTH SPORTS YOUTH SPORTS OTHER OTHER POLICE OTHER LIGHTS SUPER HERO BOOT CAMP SUP SENIOR BOOK CLUB SENIOR EVENT SENIOR SUPPLIES SENIOR TRIP EVENT VENUS CREATIONS, INC VARIOUS SIGN FOR EVENTS Total for Department 205 IMAGE PRINTING & GRA SOCCER & BASEBALL CAMP F CROWN TROPHY, INC. MEDALS /RIBBONS Total for Department 207 U S BANK VISA FIRST AID SUPPLIES ZEPHYR GRAF -X LL SHIELD (WHT) Total for Department 208 Total for Fund 201 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 301 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 401 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE NEW SQUAD SET UP Total for Department 420 Total for Fund 402 CRAIG SEVERSON CONST INSTALL 6 CONCRETE FOOTI Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 405 Amount 130,371.35* 10.00 10.00 20.00* 178.50 178.50* 32.91 32.91* 6.95 80.22 387.20 136.95 13.13 357.00 67.73 1,049.18* 392.08 772.17 1,164.25* 217.41 1,130.35 1,347.76* 3,792.60* 714.00 714.00* 714.00* 1,071.00 1,071.00* 1,071.00* 4,650.68 4,650.68* 4,650.68* 7,150.00 7,150.00* 7,150.00* R1� • • • Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:36:25 Operator: KKF •artrnent OTHER OTHER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WT"'FR WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER • Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 406 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 422 AUSTIN, MARTIN OVERPAYMENT REFUND ON FI Total for Department AID ELECTRIC SERVICE AMERICAN FASTENER & VALLEY -RICH CO., INC INSTRUMENTAL RESEARC TWIN CITY FAB, INC. TDS METROCOM MN C. W. HOULE, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY HAWKINS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE LARSON ALLEN, LLP MENARDS, INC. CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS MN DEPT OF HEALTH XCEL ENERGY PETTY CASH U S BANK VISA WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. GOPHER STATE ONE -CAL SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUB TROUBLESHOOT VFD SWITCHES FOR PLOW HEADLI REPAIR OF LEAKING VALVE TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA 1 PC OF ALUMINUM .095X8 - MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES REPAIR GATE VALVE APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR CHLORINE CYLINDERS EXTENSION BIT 12" /BIT SE HARDWARE /FLOORING 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL COIL OXY /NORSK VAN /RESPI MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES RENEWAL APPLICATION APRIL 2011 ENERGY CHARGE POSTAGE STRAP REPAIR AND NEW STR PARTS FOR LEAKING VALVE APRIL 2011 LOCATES VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE Total for Department 494 Total for Fund 601 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES APRIL 2011 GAS USAGE CONNEXUS ENERGY APRIL 2011 ELECTRIC CHAR HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE HARDWARE /FLOORING INFRASTRUCTURE TECHN JET /VAC CLEAN OF SANITAR LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2010 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS MONTHLY ENERGY CHARGES METROPOLITAN COUNCIL JUNE 2011 WASTEWATER SER GOPHER STATE ONE -CAL APRIL 2011 LOCATES Total for Department 495 Total for Fund 602 1,428.00 1,428.00* 1,428.00* 178.50 178.50* 178.50* 8.00 8.00* 809.00 95.10 5,418.38 142.50 33.17 113.06 2,060.00 928.45 65.00 27.55 208.87 2,499.00 85.69 310.98 23.00 2,012.03 4.82 91.74 115.29 257.63 6,479.10 21,780.36* 21,788.36* 17.08 365.20 35.43 14,513.00 4,284.00 46.26 60,082.17 257.62 79,600.76* 79,600.76* P1E Date: 05/16/2011 Time: 15:36:25 Operator: KKF Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount ANOKA COUNTY ORD NO 06 -11 /CENTURY FAR ANOKA COUNTY QUIT CLAIM DEED /CENTURY COMMISSIONER OF FINA MAY 2011 FORFEITURE OF P ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNE MAY 2011 FORFEITURE OF S Total for Department Total for Fund 801 Grand Total 46.00 46.00 419.05 838.10 1,349.15* 1,349.15* 252,094.40* P11 • • CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register - FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/7/2011 - 5/20/2011 May 20, 2011 12:OOPM •rZeport Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Period Issue Date Number Number Payee 05/11 05/20/2011 4818 05/11 05/20/2011 4819 05/11 05/20/2011 4820 05/11 05/20/2011 4821 05/11 05/20/2011 4822 05/11 05/20/2011 4823 05/11 05/20/2011 4824 05/11 05/20/2011 4825 05/11 05/20/2011 4826 05/11 05/20/2011 4827 05/11 05/20/2011 4828 05/11 05/20/2011 4829 05/11 05/20/2011 4830 05/11 05/20/2011 4831 05/11 05/20/2011 4832 05/11 05/20/2011 4833 05/11 05/20/2011 4834 Grand Totals: • Description 11565 30480 31008 31137 40040 60300 70578 120331 120450 130205 130360 130825 160150 180600 220200 220250 240100 ASPEN MILLS CENTENNIAL UTILITIES COMCAST CONNEXUS ENERGY DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY FIRE SAFETY USA, INC GRAINGER LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TR CITY OF LINO LAKES MMKR, INC CITY OF MEDINA MINNESOTA UI PEARSON EDUCATION, INC CITY OF ROSEVILLE VERIZON WIRELESS VIKING TROPHIES, INC XCEL ENERGY BOOTS STATION 1 UTILITIES INTERNET STATION 1 ELECTRIC STATION 1 BOTTLED WATER RES Q RENCH TOOL BATTERIES EXCESS LIABILITY INS 4/11 -4/1 APRIL REIMBURSEMENTS FINAL 2010 AUDIT BILLING 4 USED COMPUTERS UNEMP BENEFITS EMT CLASS WORKBOOKS JT POWERS MIS CELL PHONES PLAQUE ELECTRIC STATION 2 Check Amount 129.50 244.66 94.00 373.72 19.10 569.55 391.95 20,649.00 29,406.51 5,215.00 800.00 40.27 387.16 655.58 247.81 211.83 456.40 59,892.04 • M = Manual Check, V = Void Check • • • 1 2 3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES May 2, 2011 4 DATE : May 2, 2011 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. 6 TIME ENDED : 10:15 p.m. 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, 8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 10 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development 13 Director Mike Grochala; Police Chief John Swenson; Finance Director Al Rolek; City 14 Planner Paul Bengtson; Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; 15 Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson; City Clerk Julie Bartell 16 17 1. Stormwater Management Overview - Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) 18 EOR, Inc. — Community Development Director Grochala explained that the city is 19 required to adopt a local storm water management plan (SWMP). The council has 20 requested an overview of the requirements for such a plan. He reviewed the Impaired 21 Water Program, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program, the 22 Wetland Conservation Act, groundwater planning, shoreland and flood plain management 23 and the Local Surface Water Management plan requirements. 24 25 Jason Naber, Emmons & Olivier, Inc. (EOR, Inc.) gave a PowerPoint presentation 26 outlining a SAMP for the city of Lino Lakes (presentation is on file). 27 28 The city was presented with an award from the ACEC of Minnesota honoring the city and 29 EOR, Inc. for the Lino Lakes SAMP. 30 31 When the mayor asked about the city's requirements to complete a plan, Community 32 Development Director Grochala explained the minimum requirements and, when asked 33 how an effort would be funded, explained that the city charges a surface water 34 management fee in connection with development and those funds would be used. He 35 added that part of the plan is developing a CIP related to storm water management that 36 will indicate needs and proposed funding. There could be other funding components 37 such grants or ad valorem taxes. 38 39 The council directed staff to continue their discussion with EOR, Inc. in the direction the 40 council has indicated; staff suggested that they would work to get the costs down. When 41 a council member suggested that staff should get some cost comparisons from other 42 providers, Mr. Grochala explained a comparison would be difficult since efforts probably 43 wouldn't yield any apples -to- apples view of services. Staff will include analysis of the 44 best use of funds as the proposal is reviewed. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 DRAFT 45 An EOR, Inc. representative noted that what they (EOR) have proposed initially isn't the 46 minimum the city could; it does include things that they see would be beneficial to the 47 city. They'd be happy to look over the proposal again. 48 49 2. Nadeau Farm Development — Marcel Eibensteiner - Community Development 50 Director Grochala introduced developer Marcel Eibensteiner and his engineer for the 51 proposed development. Mr. Grochala then explained that the site under discussion is a 52 portion of a site that is guided medium density under the draft 2010 Comp Plan. 53 Developer Eibensteiner is interested in moving forward with development of single 54 family homes on a portion however there are issues. Until the updated Comprehensive 55 Plan is adopted, the developer would require an amendment to the existing Plan. The 56 proposal could conceivable go through a planned unit development (PUD) process for the 57 whole site and apparently that would require a level a detail that the developer says he is 58 not yet ready to establish especially in consideration of the current economic conditions. 59 Mr. Eibensteiner confirmed that the PUD process suggested by staff is not feasible for 60 him. He needs to build to suit the market and density is not what is selling. Mr. 61 Grochala remarked that amending the density ratios within the updated comprehensive 62 plan isn't recommended because a change in one area impacts all others. The mayor 63 suggested that the best way to allow for this proposed development would be to figure out 64 a way to do it and keep it within medium density. Staff will continue to work on the 65 figures and report back. 66 67 3. Emerald Ash Borer Update — Environmental Coordinator Asleson and Public 68 Works employee Mike Hoffman were present. Mr. Asleson reviewed the update report 69 before the council, including outlining the number of ash trees estimated on public and 70 private property, treatment options and funding opportunities. The draft Emerald Ash 71 Borer Management Plan has been before the city's Environmental Board and it will 72 remain under review. Mr. Asleson noted that the borer has been found as close as 15 73 miles from the city. It will be important to consider treatment options as the borer moves 74 closer. The mayor remarked that he is interested in understanding how treatment will be 75 prioritized; he'd like to see an action plan that indicates how the city is ready to manage 76 the problem. The plan should of course include how trees on public property will be 77 treated but also an element to bring important information to the public on residential 78 treatment options, including costs. Mr. Asleson noted that there will be information in 79 the next city newsletter. Staff will be reviewing plans more with the Environmental 80 Board and reporting back to the council in the future. 81 82 4. American Legion Parking — Community Development Director Grochala noted 83 that staff has an initial question prior to discussion of the staff report. There is an event 84 coining up at the American Legion facility this coming weekend and Governor Dayton is 85 an expected attendee and so quite a large crowd is expected. The Legion is therefore 86 interested in utilizing the adjacent city -owned land for parking for this one event. City 87 Clerk Bartell reported the following information: the event may have in excess of 300 88 attendees, the city -owned land could accommodate 100 -150 cars without interfering with 89 the community garden area; 77`x' Street is on- street parking available; the land wouldn't 2 p1 • • • • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 DRAFT 90 be too wet for use since it is sand based and doesn't get muddy; the city attorney reports 91 that city insurance would generally cover the land and additional coverage by the Legion 92 is recommended; a hold harmless agreement is recommended; police department is 93 working with the state patrol on the Governor's visit; Fire Department lot is partially 94 available. The council concurred with the request for parking for a one -time use the 95 coming weekend. 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 The mayor noted that without agreement on all sides of the matter, there really isn't a 123 project in his eyes. He disclosed that he has spoken with the developer and has heard 124 their needs and why they can't change them. He also understands what the neighbors are 125 saying. Ms. Divine remarked that if the 50,000 square foot store isn't acceptable to the 126 council, more discussion may not be needed; also the tax increment element won't be 127 available indefinitely. The development could be proposed without city assistance (tax 128 increment) however no formal application has been received. The mayor remarked that 129 he sees it is appropriate for the council to give the developer an answer on the project; his 130 preference would be to give them an answer other than just "no ". In that light, his 131 question would be "if not this, what ?" understanding that something will eventually be The Mayor then noted that the American Legion has some long- standing parking issues and they are requesting on -going use of some of the city owned land for that purpose. City ordinance has specific requirements for parking areas (including curb and gutters) so a temporary use would be a difficult call. Henry White, American Legion Commander, noted that the Legion understands that temporary means they could lose the parking at the city's call. The Mayor suggested that the Legion consider buying a portion such as a half acre. Mr. Grochala noted that splitting the land could inhibit its future sale. Mr. White stressed that the American Legion facility clearly doesn't have adequate parking but it's a good community organization that serves the area and doesn't make a lot of money. The council discussed the option of joining the current Legion parking with adjacent Fire Department lot to gain parking space. Staff will continue to work with the Legion on options and report back to the council. 5. Update on 49/J Development Proposal — Economic Development Coordinator Divine reviewed her written update on the grocery store proposal. As recommended previously by the council, a public meeting was held on the proposal. Approximately 75 people attended the meeting and some voiced their concerns about such things as noise, size of store, traffic, proximity to residential area and 24 hour operations. Staff has since met with the developer and has heard from them that they would not be interested in building a smaller store (she shared market information for the area that the developer had provided). She noted the master planning that has been done for the area and the need for infrastructure improvements for new development. She also reviewed the concept of tax increment financing for those improvements, as has been discussed previously. 132 developed at the site. 133 3 p1 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 DRAFT 134 The council heard comments from citizens in the audience: they do not want a negative 135 impact on the neighborhood; something neighborhood -based would be more appropriate; 136 not a destination development but rather a nice gateway to the neighborhood; nothing box 137 type is acceptable to the neighborhood; keep the trucks out; it's not the box type of 138 development they won't accept but rather the noise and traffic that goes with that type of 139 development. Suggestions for the site were a school, office space, single family homes, 140 or a park. A council member noted that marketing research in the area seems to indicate 141 that a grocery store is needed. Some residents of the city of Shoreview noted their current 142 problem of cut - through traffic and Community Development Director Grochala pointed 143 out that any project in the area would include a traffic study, and he acknowledged that 144 there is obviously already a traffic capacity problem. When a citizen commented that 145 there are already high water issues and they would be exacerbated with new development, 146 Mr. Grochala noted that storm water management is also part of any development plan. 147 148 The mayor noted that he is asking about possibilities because in business he knows there 149 is room for negotiation. There were suggestions from the audience of a smaller store 150 (Mississippi Market). There was also concern raised that the proposal contains no 151 improvement on the corner where blight exists. 152 153 The council directed staff to pass on the feedback to the developers. 154 155 6. Redevelopment Task Force — Economic Development Coordinator Divine 156 reported that the council asked EDAC to look at issues surrounding underused and 157 nonconforming properties in the city. The EDAC group worked with staff's guidance on 158 such areas as existing city regulations (ordinances, charter, fire code, etc) and came up 159 with a number of necessities to deal with properties: identify properties; determine 160 impact on city tax base; determine impediments to development; and actions the city 161 could take (regulatory, financial) to assist. Staff inventoried properties on Lake Drive and 162 Hodgson Road, resulting in 163 properties initially. Vacant and single family homes 163 were eliminated. Many of the properties do not have city water access and that impedes 164 redevelopment that requires code compliance that includes certain fire suppression. The 165 impact of the properties on the city's tax base was reviewed and properties were also 166 classified for risk of becoming vacant. Possible actions identified by EDAC: allow 167 market forces to determine redevelopment; expedite redevelopment by providing funding 168 sources; determine funds to assist with utility access; consider changes to zoning 169 ordinances. EDAC's suggestions focus on the city being more proactive; Ms. Divine 170 reviewed their recommendations to the council. 171 172 The Mayor remarked that this report is a wonderful piece of work and he offered thanks 173 to the group and to Council Member Roeser who brought up the concept of looking at the 174 properties. Ms. Divine added that the issue of underused or blighted properties is 175 somewhat isolated and all cities deal with them; there are no magic bullets to solve the 176 issues surrounding them. What the city can learn is that a redevelopment plan with a 177 funding source would be a key strategy to improvements. 178 4 P2IJ • • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 DRAFT 179 The council concurred to accept the report and request that the Planning and Zoning 180 Board pay particular attention to zoning as they review the zoning ordinances that could 181 helpful in light of improving the underuse of properties. The council recommended that 182 the report be available for strategic planning. Staff should return for more discussion on 183 options that move ahead with the recommendations. 184 185 7. On- Street Parking Regulations — Community Development Director Grochala 186 explained that he is responding to a resident's concern about a dump truck parking on a 187 residential street. At this time the city doesn't have any regulations on street parking that 188 would deal with this type of issue. Is the council interested in developing more 189 restrictions? 190 191 A council member noted that it can become a safety issue (due to blocking the street) and 192 it seems as if some other cities are dealing with the problem. The Police Chief said he 193 checked the location and doesn't feel the street is too narrow for emergency vehicles; he 194 wonders if a restriction on commercial vehicles may be more appropriate. Mr. Grochala 195 suggested that "commercial vehicles" may be too general; discussions with the city 196 attorney came back to size limitations. Staff will review options and report back. 197 198 8. Anoka County Fiber Project - Administrator Karlson noted that the council 199 requested additional information on this recently discussed county wide fiber connectivity 200 project. The council is receiving a chart comparing our current provider with the services 201 proposed through the new project. 202 203 9. Candidate Website Links — City Clerk Bartell noted that the council recently 204 discussed the subject of voter information and it was suggested that staff review the 205 possibility of placing candidate web site links on the city's web site for local elections. 206 The council is receiving some examples of what other cities are doing in this area and 207 staff is seeking council direction on what policy this city would like to follow in the area. 208 209 Council members concurred that they would like to provide web site links for the coming 210 elections; staff will work further on a policy to guide the web use, including a disclaimer 211 for content, and such elements as timing. 212 213 10. Charter Amendments relating to Elections — City Clerk Bartell noted recent 214 changes in the election calendar (state and federal) and staff's effort to review this city's 215 election regulations to ensure they are appropriate within the new schedule. Since the city 216 charter contains election provisions, it was reviewed and staff did identify a couple of 217 areas where changes are recommended. A calendar was distributed and Clerk Bartell 218 explained that a key date is when the city must submit its ballot language to the county 219 for ballot printing. Based on the current charter provisions, the period designed for 220 candidate filing would extend past that date of ballot submission to the county. Therefore 221 staff is recommending a change that simply indicates that the city will follow state law for 222 the filing period, thus covering any future changes also. Community Development 223 Director Grochala noted that City Charter Chapter 8 also has a timeline that is 5 P21 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 2, 2011 DRAFT 224 problematic with the ballot submission date moved up. The city attorney has 225 recommended language to address the change and also to clarify special election 226 references. 227 228 Ms. Bartell explained that the Charter Commission's regular meeting is coming up in July 229 and staff would like to present the proposed amendments to the commission. With a 230 positive recommendation from the Charter Commission, the amendments could be 231 approved with a unanimous affirmative vote of the council. The council concurred that 232 staff would forward the amendments to the commission. 233 234 11. Weekly Progress Report — There were no questions on the update as presented. 235 Staff will update the report to include the matter of the lease of the city facilities to the 236 school district (early childhood center). 237 238 Regular Council Agenda — There were no changes indicated to the council agenda as 239 presented. Administrator Karlson noted that he will be meeting with Washington and 240 Anoka County officials relative to the outstanding valuation question that will be 241 discussed at the continued Board of Appeal meeting before the regular council meeting. 242 243 The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. 244 245 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 246 May 23, 2011. 247 248 249 250 251 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 252 5 P2� • • • • • COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 2011 2 2 DRAFT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : May 9, 2011 6 TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 7 TIME ENDED : 6:40 p.m. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Gallup, Rafferty, 9 Roeser, and Mayor Reinert 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member O'Donnell 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John Swenson; and 13 City Clerk Julie Bartell 14 15 SWEARING IN CEREMONY 16 17 Mayor Reinert gave the oath of office to Public Safety Director John Swenson and newly appointed 18 Police Office Matt Paulson. 19 20 PUBLIC COMMENT 21 22 John Cartier, 2088 80th Street, explained that he has lived in his current home for 16 years and for 23 the past five years he has had difficulties relating to a trucking company being operated out of a 24 neighbor's home. With five or six tractor trailers being run out of the operation at all hours of the 25 day, it is clearly not legal in a residential setting. Along with the disruption he is also concerned 26 about the business impacts of maintaining trucks (i.e. used anti freeze and motor oil). He has suffered 27 from acts of vandalism that he attributes to the operation; police incident reports will confirm this. 28 29 The mayor suggested that staff gather background information on the situation so that the matter can 30 be discussed at the next work session. 31 32 Nick Arndt, Arndt Construction, 2190 Phelps Road. He is working with staff on the possibility of 33 an interim use of his property for a concrete facility related to the I -35E intersection improvement 34 project. Staff will get more information on the matter and report back to the council at a future work 35 session. 36 37 SETTING THE AGENDA 38 39 The agenda was approved as presented. 40 41 CONSENT AGENDA 42 43 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1D, as presented. 44 Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member 45 O'Donnell was absent. 1 COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 2011 DRAFT 46 47 ITEM ACTION 48 49 Consideration of Expenditures: 50 51 May 9, 2011 (Check No. 90639 - 52 90726, $119,139.93) Approved 53 54 Centennial Fire District (Check No. 4794- 55 4811, $33,947.61) Approved 56 57 April 25, 2011 Council Work Session 58 Minutes Approved 59 60 April 25, 2011 City Council Meeting 61 Minutes Approved 62 63 Resolution No. 11 -48, Exempt Lawful Gambling 64 & Temporary On -Sale Liquor for Lino Lakes Lions Club Approved 65 66 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK 67 68 There was no report from the Finance Department. 69 70 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 71 72 There was no report from the Administration Department. 73 74 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, KENT STREGE 75 76 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 77 78 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 79 80 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 81 82 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 83 84 There was no report from the Community Development Department. 85 86 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 87 88 There was no Unfinished Business. 89 90 91 2 • • • • • 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 2011 DRAFT NEW BUSINESS There was no New Business. COMMUNITY CALENDAR :4: Wednesday, May 11 Monday, May 16 & Tuesday, May 17 Monday, May 23 4. Monday, May 23 Community Calendar— A Look Ahead May 10, 2011 through May 23, 2011 6:30 pm, Council Chambers 5:30 pm, Community Room 5:30 pm, Community Room 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Bd Strategic Planning Council Work Session City Council Meeting ADJOURN There being no further business, Council Member Rafferty moved to adjourn at 7:20 p.m. Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member O'Donnell absent. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, May 23, 2011. Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor • • • BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES April 25, 2014 Draft 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 BOARD OF REVIEW 4 5 DATE : April 25, 2011 6 TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 7 TIME ENDED : 6:30 p.m. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Gallup, Roeser, O'Donnell, 9 Rafferty and Mayor Reinert 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John Swenson; City 13 Clerk Julie Bartell 14 15 Anoka County Assessor Linda Weiner explained that the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization of 16 the City of Lino Lakes is meeting for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of the 17 city for the year 2011, payable in 2012. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said 18 assessments were given the opportunity to address the Board. She reminded those present that only 19 appeals for the current year valuation or classification could be made. Discussion of the Board is 20 limited to valuations only, not taxes. Ms. Weiner reviewed briefly the Anoka County, 2011 Board of 21 Appeal and Equalization, County Assessor's Report document and presented a brief overview of the 22 property tax process and a recap of current assessments. 23 24 Ms. Weiner then noted that she had spoken with the council at a recent work session about a group of 25 property owners whose property is split between Anoka County and Washington County; their homes 26 are located on property in Anoka County (Lino Lakes) and another portion of their same lots 27 (lakeshore) is located in Washington County (Hugo). 28 29 Kathy Wall, 6020 Bald Eagle Boulevard, told the board that the valuation for the Washington County 30 portion of her property and her neighbors has increased by up to 600 percent. Since Anoka County 31 takes into consideration the Washington County portion of their lots, they feel that they are being 32 double valued. She added that the portion outside of Anoka County is unbuildable. Furthermore 33 their lakeshore situation is odd because they can't even see the lake from their homes. 34 35 John Kulas, 6110 Bald Eagle Boulevard, added that there is nothing to compare with their lots. 36 37 The council suggested that there should be some communication with either Hugo or Washington 38 County about this situation. The city administrator will handle that communication and report back; 39 the board will be continued to May 9. 40 41 Nancy Eliass, 6331 Cherokee Trail, noted that she had spoken with Mg Weiner who suggested that 42 she attend this meeting to present her appeal. She refinanced her home and, as part of that process, a 43 valuation was prepared. She presented some information on comparable properties and requested that 44 the council reduce her valuation accordingly. 45 1 P2; BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES April 25, 2011 Draft 46 Mr. Weiner explained that mortgage appraisals are based on some different data than she is allowed 47 to use; mortgage appraisers are allowed to use one foreclosure in their appraisal so that does impact 48 the comparable data. 49 50 The council concurred that Ms. Eliason should be referred to the Anoka County Board of Appeals. 51 52 Thomas Jackson, 431 Post Road, reported that he purchased his home in Lino Lakes in 2010 for 53 $200,000. He believes that would be the actual value of the house, especially since there was a tragic 54 incident that occurred in the home and that affects resale value. 55 56 The council concurred that they would like to receive more information on how a trauma impacts 57 home values. They will continue discussion of Mr. Jackson's appeal at the continued meeting on 58 May 9, 2011. 59 60 ADJOURN 61 62 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. (the board meeting had been 63 recessed for the purpose of conducting the regular council meeting) to be continued to May 9, 2011, 64 5:30 p.m. 65 66 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on May 23, 2011. 67 68 69 70 71 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 72 2 P24 • • • • • • BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES May 9, 201 t Draft DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES BOARD OF REVIEW : May 9, 2011 . 5:45 p.m. . 6:30 p.m. : Council Member Gallup, Roeser, and Mayor Reinert : Council Member Rafferty and O'Donnell Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John Swenson; City Clerk Julie Bartell Anoka County Assessor Linda Weiner noted that the council continued the board meeting so as to continue discussion on two matters: a) the lakeshore properties on Bald Eagle Lake that are split between Anoka and Washington County; and b) Mr. Jackson's property at 431 Post Road. There was no one present wishing to speak on the Bald Eagle Lake property. The council received an update from Ms. Weiner on the property. City staff had met with her, an Anoka County appraiser, Hugo's Community Development Director, and a Washington County appraiser to discuss the Bald Eagle Lake property values. Historically, the Washington County appraiser had adjusted the lake frontage values to $1,000 per linear foot, which resulted in a significant increase of assessed land value to the property owners who addressed the board on April 25. Apparently Washington County based their appraisal on their across - the -board rate for lake front property while Anoka County's assessment is based on "site value." Both appraisers pointed out that if you add the Anoka County assessment and the Washington County assessment, the total land value is in the range of where both counties would be if the properties were exclusively assessed in either county. Because of the limited lake view that these properties have, Ms. Wiener indicated that she is willing to propose a 10% reduction in her appraisal, which would lower the property tax assessment by $21,710 for the five property owners appealing their assessment. The board concurred with the proposed reduction; the mayor indicated that he'd still like to have a discussion with the Hugo city council to see what can/should be done long term to deal with this unusal situation. The board then heard from Ms. Weiner regarding Mr. Jackson's property at 431 Post Road. Ms. Weiner reported that she retrieved more comparables on the property. Regarding the question of devaluation because of a tragedy having occurred in the home, she hasn't been able to confirm the incident for this property. If the incident did occur, it wasn't with the owner just previous to Mr. Jackson; there is probably less and less impact the more such a property changes hands. She's recommending no change to the valuation she has proposed. Mr. Jackson appeared with his own comparables and provided that information to the council members. He noted that Ms. Weiner's comparables are not appropriate since they are older and 1 P25 P2( BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES May 9, 2011 Draft 46 actually come from the period when there was a tax rebate in place, that kept home prices higher. • 47 His comparables are also of homes that are more similar to his own. 48 49 Ms. Weiner noted that state law allows her to look only at a certain period for comparables. Further, 50 the sale of Mr. Jackson's home is not a qualified sale, because he purchased the property from a 51 relative. 52 53 Mr. Jackson explained that he bought the home in November of 2010 for $200,000 from his father -in- 54 law who has just purchased it from the estate of the disceased. There are two issues that make this 55 house overvalued — the sigma attached to the death in the house and secondly the fact that it is valued 56 higher than comparable homes. He added that because of the death, there are certain elements who 57 will never purchase the house. He read information that he stated was from a study of 58 psychologically impacted properties — the home has a history and it affects his property value. 59 60 The mayor noted that apparently the more a home changes hands, the less stigma it carries. He noted 61 that if all the comparables are averaged, the value would still come in over $200,000 and further the 62 12 percent that it has been reduced this year is quite higher than the average percentage seen 63 throughout the city. 64 65 The council concurred that Mr. Jackson should have the option of going to the county board of 66 appeals. 67 68 ADJOURN • 69 70 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. on a motion by Council 71 Member Roeser, seconded by Council Member Gallup, and adopted on a voice vote. 72 73 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on May 23, 2011. 74 75 76 77 78 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 79 • 2 • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 1F Julie Bartell, City Clerk May 23, 2011 Consider Resolution No. 11 -54, Authorizing issuance of a special event permit and temporary Liquor license for a benefit event at American Legion Post 566 Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required) P. 2GA- The city has received a special event permit application from Ms. Anna Swanson and American Legion Post 566. Ms. Johnson, in conjunction with the Legion, is planning a benefit to assist with the medical expenses of Mr. George Bruhn. The plans include food, music, carnival games and a silent auction all to take place at American Legion Post 566 at 7731 Lake Drive, on June 4, 2011 between the hours of 4:00 and 8:00 p.m. As part of the event the Legion would like to allow the consumption of alcoholic beverages in a fenced area outside of but contiguous to their building. Therefore they have submitted a request for local approval of a temporary on -sale liquor license. City staff has reviewed the special event plans to ensure that they are within city regulations and public safety concerns are met. A list of conditions dealing with some elements of the event and facilities have been developed and are attached to Resolution No. 11 -54. The applicant has agreed to the conditions. Therefore, staff is presenting for city council consideration a resolution authorizing the issuance of a special event permit to Ms. Swanson and American Legion Post 566. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 11 -54 authorizing issuance of a special event permit for a benefit event at American Legion Post 566 on June 4, 2011. 2. Deny Resolution No. 11 -47. 29c Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -54 AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL EVENT AND TEMPORARY LIQUOR PERMIT FOR A BENEFIT AT AMERICAN LEGION POST 566 WHEREAS, Ms. Anna Swanson and American Legion Post 566 have submitted an application for a special event permit; and WHEREAS, the event planned is a benefit on June 4, 2011, from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at American Legion Post 566 located at 7731 Lake Drive that includes food, music, carnival games, as well as a silent and live auction; and WHEREAS, American Legion Post 566 has applied for a temporary on -sale liquor license to allow the consumption of alcoholic beverages in a fenced area outside of their building; and WHEREAS, American Legion Post 566 has submitted proof of liquor and general liability insurance that extends to the entire benefit area; and WHEREAS, based on a review of the application, staff has composed a list of conditions relative to the event and facilities; Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes: That the City Council authorizes issuance of a Special Event Permit to Anna Swanson and American Legion Post 566, for a special event and temporary liquor license on June 4, 2011. Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 23rd day of May, 2011. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: May 23, 2011 TOPIC: Resolution No. 11 -49: Preliminary Approval of Revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The City Council approved Resolution No. 09 -23 in June of 2009, granting preliminary approval of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. The plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council in August of 2009. At the request of the Metropolitan Council, supplemental materials were submitted in October 2009 and the plan submittal was determined to be complete. The plan was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council's Environmental Committee and Community Development Committee in November 2009. On December 9, 2009 the Metropolitan Council authorized the City to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect. The City Council has continued to discuss modification of the plan regarding growth management and housing. At the January 4, 2011 work session the City Council completed its review and directed staff to make the following modifications and distribute the plan to adjacent jurisdictions for review. • Chapter 3, Land Use Plan (pages 26 -27). The statement within the Growth Management Policy establishing an annual average of 230 new residential dwelling units per year was modified. The City Council reduced the maximum number of residential units allowed in any one year The proposed language now reads: "The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5 year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 year phasing period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year phase." • Chapter 4, Housing Plan (pages 10 -11). The City Council added a statement that in acknowledging Metropolitan Council's affordability goals the City is not committing to provide funding for housing. Also included are limited text revisions within the affordable housing section. P27 2030 Comprehensive Plan City Council May 23, 2011 page 2 The City Council modified the Residential Land Use density ranges as follows: Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential 1.6 to 3.9 units per acre (instead of 1.5 to 3.5) 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre (instead of 3.6 to 6.9) 6.0 to 10.0 units per acre (instead of 7.0 to 12.0) The proposed Land Use Plan revisions are intended to address council concerns regarding establishment of a hard growth cap, providing development flexibility, managing pace of growth, and maintaining even growth from year to year while still accommodating the growth forecasts. Upon final approval of the Comprehensive Plan the city's existing Growth Management ordinance would be amended to incorporate these revisions. Staff submitted the proposed revisions to adjacent jurisdictions for review in February 2011. The information sent to the adjacent jurisdictions included supplemental material submitted to the Met Council in October 2009 as part of the original review because the other jurisdictions had not seen that material. The last response was received on May 11, 2011. The only change resulting from comments from the other jurisdictions are minor corrections in the transit section regarding express bus route 275. These corrections are included in Attachment A along with other transit corrections resulting from the 2009 Met Council approval. We also sent the proposed revisions to the Met Council for a preliminary look in order to expedite the formal review. Met Council wanted the estimated breakdown of sewered and unsewered households added to the growth forecast table on page 1 -6. This just inserts data that was part of the original review but not in the document. It does not change the forecasts. The next step is to submit the revisions for formal review by the Metropolitan Council. After Met Council's approval, the City Council will need to act to grant final approval. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution No. 11 -49, Preliminary Approval of revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to Metropolitan Council. This approval includes the revisions in Attachment A, described in this report. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A, Revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan P2E • • • • • • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -49 RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF REVISED 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR SUBMITTAL TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 473.864 requires that every city within the Seven County Metropolitan Area must review and, if necessary, update its comprehensive plan every ten years and submit it to the Metropolitan Council for review; and WHEREAS, the City conducted an extensive planning process that included a quality of life survey in 2005; and WHEREAS, the quality of life survey was followed by the creation of a citizen committee that prepared the 2030 Vision Plan, which was completed in 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Council established the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel, a citizen group that worked with city staff and the City Council through 2007, 2008, and into 2009 to prepare the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the goals and policies in the 2030 Vision Plan form the foundation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board conducted two public hearings on the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan, on September 9, 2008 and April 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council and was approved by the Metropolitan Council on December 9, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Council made subsequent revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan through years 2010 and 2011; and WHEREAS, the revisions were distributed to adjacent jurisdictions for review in accordance with MN Statute 473.859 and all the jurisdictions have responded. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the revised draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. P2: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval includes the revisions to the draft plan included in Attachment A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that following review by the Metropolitan Council, the City Council will consider final approval of the Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2011. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. P3[ • • • • Attachment A Revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan May 23, 2011 • • P31 higher than the Met Council's 2030 employment forecasts for the city. According to the most recent Met Council employment estimates, the City contained 3,750 jobs in 2005 and 3,920 jobs in 2006: In other words, the City has already exceeded the Met Council's original 2030 employment forecast of 3,550 total jobs. As demonstrated above in Table 1 -1, the Met Council forecasts do not account for the number of existing jobs within the city. As the city grows, additional opportunities for commercial and industrial employment will be created. A revised employment forecast was discussed with Met Council staff during the preparation of this Comprehensive Plan update and Met Council staff indicated that the revised employment forecast presented in Table 1 -2 was reasonable. Therefore this Comprehensive Plan Update is based on accommodating the employment growth forecast presented in Table 1 -2 rather than the original System Statement forecast presented in Table 1 -1. Table 1 -2. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Growth Forecasts __�___ —__ i 2000 Estimate 2010 2020 2030_ Population 16,791 22,500 7,500 26,300 9L100 7 800 30,700 10 600 • •75 Households 4,857 sewered 2,857 31 s unsewered 2,444 2,000 2 Pi 6,200 1,300 8,000 625 Employment 4,100 The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan will focus on conformance with metropolitan plans and consistency with regional policies for transportation, water resources, wastewater services, housing, land use, regional parks and open space. The city's plan was reviewed for compatibility with adjacent and affected government units such as Anoka, Washington, and Ramsey counties, cities of Centerville, Columbus, Forest Lake, Hugo, North Oaks, Shoreview, Circle Pines, Blaine and Ham Lake, White Bear Township, Rice Creek Watershed District, Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization, Centennial Independent School District No. 12, Forest Lake Independent School District No, 831, and White Bear Lake Independent School District No. 624. The city received comments from several adjacent and affected governmental units and the plan was revised to address many of the comments. The city will also need to coordinate planning efforts with government agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MnDOT and the Pollution Control Agency. Additionally, to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with natural resource protection and mitigation measures, the Comprehensive Plan was prepared in concert with the Rice Creek Watershed District's Resource Management Plan, an unprecedented cooperative planning effort between a municipality and a watershed district. The City of Lino Lakes is classified by the Metropolitan Council as a 'Developing" community (Figure 1 -4). Developing communities are cities where the most substantial amount of new growth will occur through the year 2030– about 60 percent of new households and 40 percent of new jobs. Developments should be 3 – 5+ units per acre, with higher densities near transportation corridors. Lino Lakes needs to plan for 20 years of growth and identify post -2030 growth areas. The City of Lino Lakes has prepared a plan that responds to these Metropolitan Council guidelines for developing communities. The City has prepared a Land Use Plan that is consistent with the net density requirements. Higher density residential housing and mixed use nodes that will incorporate high density housing are planned along the City's major transportation corridors. The City has also developed a staging plan that identifies the anticipated timing for growth through 2030 and an Urban Reserve area to accommodate post 2030 growth. P32 • • • • • • Land Use Category Description Commercial The purpose of this category is to accommodate retail, office and service uses. The purpose of this category is to accommodate manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and research and development uses. The purpose of this category is to accommodate a mix of residential, retail, and office uses either within one building, structure or development. Residential development may include higher density housing options. Permanent Rural low Density Residential The purpose of this category is to designate those areas that are not intended to receive sewer service due to topography and soil issues. Development in rural areas shall be limited to residential single family at low densities or agriculture related uses. The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential development at 1.5 to 3.5 1.6 to 3.9 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential Medium Density Residential j development at 3 6- te-6.9 4.0 to 5.9 dwelling units per acre. Urban Reserve Table 3-2: Future Land Use Categories Civic / Institutional The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential development at 7.0 -to 42?8 6.0 to 10.0 units per acre. The purpose of the Urban Reserve area is to preserve land for post - 2030 urban development. To promote an efficient future developmen pattern in this area, land use prior to year 2030 in the Urban Reserve area shall be limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential limited to one unit per 10 acres. The purpose of the Civic / Institutional area is to accommodate public buildings or facilities, private or public utilities and infrastructure, public and private schools, and cemeteries. The purpose of the Parks / Open Space area is to accommodate passive or active recreational areas and facilities as well as lands under public control that are designated as permanently undeveloped for the purpose of resource management or protection. The purpose of the Private Airfield area is to accommodate aviation related uses. P3 Discussion of Future Land Use Categories In 2030, Lino Lakes will include a variety of and use and development types. A summary of planned land use acreages is presented in Table 3 -3. Table 3 -3: 2030 Future Land Use Acreages Land Use Designation Gross Acres % Gross Acres Net Acres (Without Wetlands %Total Acres (Without Wetlands) Net Acres (Without Wetlands and Open Water) % Total Acres (Without Wetlands and Water ) Wetland N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Open Water 3273 15.4% 3273 20.8% N/A N/A Park & Open Space 3453 16.2% 1105 7.0% 1,105 8.9% Permanent Rural 682 3.2% 191 1.2% 191 1.5% Low Density Residential 4240 19.9% 3388 21.5% 3,388 27.1% Medium Density Residential 689 3.2% 581 3.7% 581 4.7% High Density Residential 189 0.9% 162 1.0% 162 1.3% Commercial 453 2.1% 396 2.5% 396 3.2% Industrial 637 3.0% 546 3.5% 546 4.4% Mixed Use 564 2.7% 536 3.4% 536 4.3% Civic/Institutional 468 2.2% 313 2.0% 313 2.5% Private Airfield 66 0.3% 42 0.3% 42 0.3% Right -of -Way 1636 7.7% 1488 9.4% 1,488 11.9% Urban Reserve 4917 23.1% 3730 23.7% 3,730 29.9% Total City *T Id 21267 100.0% 15753* 100.0% 12480 ** 100.0% ota oes not �ndude 5,522 wetland acres, which is 25% of gross acres **Total does not include 5,522 wetland acres or 3,273 open water acres. As demonstrated by Table 3 -3, approximately half of the city's total acreage consists of wetlands, water, or parks and open space, which will remain undeveloped. Approximately 34 percent of the City's total 2030 planned land area (net of wetlands and open water) will be dedicated to residential uses, which will accommodate a variety of housing types and sizes. Lino Lakes will also include additional commercial and industrial lands to provide jobs for its residents. Additional mixed use areas will provide housing and shopping opportunities and convenience for residents. Each land use category is discussed in greater detail below. Additional discussion is provided for the future land use categories that will accommodate new development. This detailed discussion will also address how the Land Use Plan will achieve the community's goals and policies. While establishing the importance of the 2030 Future Land Use Map, it is important to acknowledge the realities of land development. Future development may involve assembling several land parcels. Site layouts may need some flexibility to ensure efficient design and safety, especially internal circulation. In addition, natural features do not follow linear property boundaries. Because of these and other factors, the actual boundaries on the Proposed Land Use Map should be considered somewhat flexible in order to accommodate development or redevelopment proposals. For example, the City may consider averaging out different land use densities across the project site for a project that includes areas mapped for several residential land uses. Residential Land Uses Residential uses will account for approximately 34 percent of the total 2030 developed land area (net of wetlands and water) in Lino Lakes. Detailed descriptions of each residential land use category are included below, along with the rationale for locating these uses. 3 -14 P3A • • • • • • Low Density Residential The City's predominant future residential land use is low density sewered residential. The Land Use Plan identifies 3,388 net acres of low density residential, or 27,1 percent of the total and area (net of wetlands and water bodies). This and use category provides for housing at densities of :S to 3-5 1.6 to 3.9 units per net acre that is served by municipal sewer and water service. Efforts were made to locate these areas to avoid conflict with more intense and uses, including commercial and industrial areas, high density housing, and high traffic volume roadways. Low impact development will be required in accordance with the Resource Management Plan in environmentally sensitive areas within the Low Density Residentia! designation. This land use category also includes existing unsewered low density residential areas that will eventually be connected to City sewer and water systems. The City will work with landowners to provide utilities. Medium Density Residential The city's Land Use Plan identifies 546 net acres for medium density residential development, or 4.3 percent of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). This land use category will accommodate medium density residential development at densities of 3:674e-679 4.0 to 5.9 units per net acre served by municipal sewer and water. These areas can serve as a transition between lower and higher intensity uses. Development in these areas should consider neighboring uses, and efforts should be made to provide for smooth transitions between medium and low density areas. Several medium density residential areas were also located on sites with environmentally sensitive areas. This provides for increased flexibility for development in these areas. Allowing for higher density on suitable areas of a site will increase the financial feasibility of preserving sensitive areas, and allow for more creative site plans that incorporate natural areas into the site planning process. Standards for development in environmentally sensitive areas will require additional environmental protection measures to reduce stormwater runoff and other environmental impacts of more intense development, as defined in the Resource Management System Plan. High Density Residential The future land use plan identifies 165 net acres of high density residential uses, or 1.3 percent of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). The purpose of this land use category is to accommodate residential development at a density of -te 1270 6.0 to 10.0 units per acre served by municipal sewer and water. These areas can also serve as a transition between lower and higher intensity uses, such as commercial areas or higher volume roadways. As with medium density residential areas, several high density areas were identified to provide for development flexibility in environmentally sensitive areas. Again, additional environmental protection measures will be in place to reduce the environmental impacts of more intense development in these areas, as defined in the Resource Management System Plan. The Land Use Plan achieves many of the community's residential goals for the future. The plan provides opportunities for affordable and life -cycle housing options in the community by accommodating development at a variety of types and styles. Opportunities for a variety of housing types address the community's goal and related strategies to improve the availability of affordable and life -cycle housing. Development of affordable housing is made more feasible by increasing the allowable density on a site, as land and construction costs per unit are reduced. P35 • Ordinances: The City will review and update its ordinances to be consistent with the revised Comprehensive Plan. Through ordinance standards and the development review and permitting process, the City is able to implement many of the goals and policies included in the Plan, including the dedication of new parks, open space and trails and protection of natural features, such as wetlands, woodlands, and wildlife and plant habitats. In addition to ordinances protecting natural features, environmental protection within the city may also be supported through the incorporation of green building techniques to reduce the impacts of development and redevelopment. To promote attractive, quality development that enhances the character of Lino Lakes, landscape and design standards will also be reviewed and updated. Rice Creek Watershed District Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan: As part of the integrated comprehensive planning process, the Rice Creek Watershed District prepared a Resource Management Plan to provide a watershed -based approach to wetland management. This process included an analysis of the city's future land use plan to determine the impacts of future growth on the area's aquatic resources. A key component of the plan is to establish a Wetland Preservation Corridor. This corridor may include high priority wetlands, natural open space (uplands), greenway connections, and marginally suitable development areas. The plan identifies several strategies to mitigate development impacts, particularly within the Wetland Preservation Corridor, as more fully described in Chapter 2: Resource Management System Plan. Infrastructure Capacity In addition to the protection of natural resources, many participants of the Visioning and Comprehensive Plan processes expressed concern about the capacity of the city's infrastructure to accommodate new growth in the community. The availability of infrastructure will also be used to determine the timing and feasibility of new growth. As part of the comprehensive plan, the transportation, water, and sanitary sewer systems were analyzed to determine their capacity to accommodate the 2030 and full build -out growth forecasts. These systems are discussed more fully in Chapters 6, 7 and 8. Land Use and Transportation The city's Land Use Plan was analyzed to determine compatibility with the local transportation system. Based on this analysis, improvements to the transportation system were identified to accommodate additional growth in Lino Lakes. These improvements are discussed in the Transportation Chapter of this plan. Development review will include analysis of the transportation system and transportation improvements may be required as part of the development permitting process. Utility Staging The provision of sewer and municipal water service will be a key factor to determine the timing of future growth. As part of the Comprehensive Plan process, the future land use plan was analyzed to determine future water supply and wastewater infrastructure needs to accommodate new growth. These systems will need to be expanded to accommodate future development in the community. Therefore, a staging plan was developed to identify the sequence and anticipated timing of water and sewer provision (Figure 3 -4). The staging area boundaries are based on the city's sewer districts, current development patterns, and land needed for forecasted development. The staging plan establishes the pattern, timing, and location of future growth to 2030 and beyond. P3E s • • • • • The Staging Plan reflects the City's three growth areas where regional interceptors are located, the northeast, northwest, and south growth areas. It is noted that the White Bear Interceptor is located 1/2 mile from the Lino Lakes border and is not shown on the Staging Plan. The Staging Plan identifies areas for growth from 2010 to 2020, 2020 to 2030, and post 2030. Each ten -year staging area is also sub- divided into five -year phases. To promote an efficient growth pattern, development outside of the current five -year phase will be limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential at a density of one unit per 10 acres. Therefore, during the time period associated with Stage 1A (2008 - 2015), development in Stages 1B, 2A, 2B and Stage 3 will be limited to agriculture uses or single family residential at one unit per 10 acres. The City will monitor growth by annually assessing market conditions and and capacity to determine when the next staging area should be opened for development. The staging plan cannot force development to occur. Rather, it prohibits urban growth from occurring outside areas planned for utility service. It should be clear that while there are legitimate reasons why cities should stage and time growth in an orderly and contiguous manner, there is nothing about adopting a staged growth plan that forces any private property owner to sell their land before they wish to do so. The staging plan provides several benefits to Lino Lakes, which are listed below: • A staging plan creates orderly logical growth pattern based on planned development patterns and availability of infrastructure. • Clearly defines timing at which land is potentially available for development. • Allows the City greater control over the pace and location of new development combined with providing necessary services when planned development occurs. • Provides greater ability to plan, budget and set goals for future development based on the Staging Plan. The staging boundaries were revised several times to ensure that an adequate supply of land was available to accommodate future development. The development of the staging plan was an iterative process of balancing land capacity with the 2030 growth forecasts. After preparation of the staging map, land use acreages and appropriate densities were used to calculate potential household and employment capacity of the land use plan. Assuming the minimum allowable density for each land use category, the plan has capacity to accommodate approximately 67200 6,400 new households by 2030, The Metropolitan Council is forecasting 4,600 new households by 2030. The 2030 household growth forecast is € 28 percent less than the and use plan capacity. This additional capacity is intended to provide for flexibility. Flexibility is essential, as future development is dependent on many factors, including the willingness of property owners to sell or develop their properties. Additionally, because the city has access to five regional sewer interceptors, it is difficult to predict the pattern and rate of growth for different areas of the city. Therefore, additional land use capacity is provided to ensure that the growth forecasts can be accommodated in an efficient and cost - effective manner. The future land use plan also provides over 700 developable acres of commercial and industrial uses (including portions of mixed use districts) to accommodate the city's forecasted job growth of 4,080 new jobs by 2030. The staging plan and future land use plan were used to determine the number of acres in each and use category in five -year increments (Table 3 -5). This table provides a view of the city's planned growth by and use category in five year periods, allowing the City to better budget and plan for necessary infrastructure improvements. P37 Growth Management Policy In addition to the tools described above, the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee discussed the development of a revised Growth Management Policy for the city. The Growth Management Policy should provide a clear basis for efficient development staging as well as flexibility to respond to market conditions. The new policy must work in conjunction with the staging plan to establish the criteria for moving from one staging area to another. The ) {4( Growth Management Policy will include the following elements: 1. The City will create a fully integrated Comprehensive Plan and keep it up to date with biannual reviews. The City will perform an intensive review at least once every five years to ensure the plan addresses changing needs and conditions. 2. The Comprehensive Plan will include a staging plan defining development staging areas sized to accommodate forecasted growth. 3. The City will monitor the ten -year staging areas and annually determine if adequate land remains available. 4. All development must be located within the current ten -year staging area unless a Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved that redefines the current ten -year staging area. 5. All development must be phased within each ten -year staging area in accordance with the staging plan unless the City Council determines, by resolution, to redefine the location of the current five -year phase. 6. Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a ten -year staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will determine by resolution if the next area is to be opened to development. The following criteria will be used to determine where and when to open up the next ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on the staging plan: a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new development. If infrastructure is not available and cannot be made available in a timely manner to support expanding into the next ten -year staging area or five year phase within a staging area, the city may refrain from opening up the next staging area, or portions thereof. b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one area of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the city. Decisions to open new areas to development should clearly define and map the area being opened. c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan. 7. The following criteria will be used to determine if the city should allow a specific development project to occur early in a ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a staging area, prior to the timing indicated on the staging plan. 1331 • • • • • • a. The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next ten - year staging area, or five -year phase, or located adjacent to the current staging area. b. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments do not justify redefining the ten -year staging area, or five -year phase. c, The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values. d. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new development. e. There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of infrastructure improvement costs associated with development. 8. All development must adhere to the Resource Management System Plan, including all its components, as this plan provides a conservation design framework for growth within the city. 9. Include standards in subsequent ordinance updates to ensure quality development that minimizes negative impacts on natural and cultural features of the community. 10. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5 veal phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 year phasing period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year phase Relationship to Met Council Development Framework In addition to guiding Lino Lakes' future growth, the land use plan also relates to growth and development in the region as a whole, As part of the seven -county metropolitan area, Lino Lakes must accommodate its share of the region's growth, The Comprehensive Plan must demonstrate the City's capacity to absorb this growth and that the regional infrastructure, including the transportation and sewer systems, will be used efficiently. The Metropolitan Council has developed objectives and policies for cities in the metropolitan area to ensure efficient use of the region's infrastructure, including the following policies: 1) Policy 1: Work with local communities to accommodate growth in a flexible, connected and efficient manner. 2) Policy 2: Plan and invest in multi -modal transportation choices, based on the full range of costs and benefits, to slow the growth of congestion and serve the region's economic needs. 3) Policy 3: Encourage expanded choices in housing location and types, and improved access to jobs and opportunities. 4) Policy 4: Work with local and regional partners to reclaim, conserve, protect and enhance the region's vital natural resources. The City has prepared a plan that responds to community goals and to the Met Council's strategies for developing communities, as outlined in the Regional Development Framework. Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan adequately addresses future needs of the community and the region through the following strategies: P39 Chapter 4: Housing Plan introduction The condition, affordability, and availability of housing affects the social and economic health of every city. As a developing community, Lino Lakes has an excellent opportunity to provide a variety of housing options to meet the needs of all its current and future residents throughout their lives. Through the Comprehensive Plan and Visioning processes, participants identified the need for a greater variety of housing options within the community, which currently consists mainly of single family detached homes. In response, they rebenSivePiaRAdvisory Parnel City developed a Land Use Plan that identifies areas for high density housing (7 e la 6.0 to 10.0 units /net acre, medium density housing (3:6 -6:9 4.0 to 5.9 units /net acre), low density housing (1=5 375 1.6 to 3.9 units /net acre), and mixed use areas that will incorporate a mix of commercial areas with higher density housing options. This will accommodate a wider variety of housing types including senior housing, live /work units, and mufti-family in a variety of styles from rental, condo and townhomes. Single family options will range from entry-level single family, move -up for growing families and "executive housing" to meet the needs of a changing population. This shift to provide a more diverse housing supply supports future economic development objectives by retaining existing residents and attracting new residents from all social and economic backgrounds, and is an essential component for sustainable growth. These areas will provide much needed housing options for the city's work force, young professionals, families, and senior residents. The purpose of the Housing Plan is to establish plans and programs to meet the existing and projected housing needs in Lino Lakes and to develop new strategies to promote the development of low and moderate income housing, which the City is required to provide for. The plan will guide the community to integrate housing into land use, transportation, economic and other decisions, as well as provide direction for the private sector to participate in the creation of affordable housing and life -cycle housing opportunities. This Housing Plan satisfies the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and stipulations of Chapter 473.859, Subd 2(c) and Subd 4 of the Minnesota State Statues. The plan will contain background information on current housing supply and related statistics, an assessment of current and future housing needs, and future housing strategies to meet these needs. Goals and Policies During the Visioning and Comprehensive Plan processes, participants developed new goals and strategies for housing development in the community. The complete set of goals and strategies, which provided a general guide for the development of this chapter, is listed in Chapter 3, Land Use Plan. Those that are particularly related to housing in Lino Lakes are presented below: Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses j and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. I i Rationale: Accessibility to the most attractive features of Lino Lakes is important to the citizens of our community. P4( • • • • • Based on its analysis, the Metropolitan Council's new affordable housing goal. for Lino Lakes is to create 560 new affordable housing units between 2011 and 2020, which represents 35 percent of forecasted household growth. Based on the 2030 future and use map and the minimum proposed residential densities (i.e,, 7 units per acre for high density and 8 units per acre for selected mixed use areas), the City has the capacity to accommodate the affordable housing goal. The level of affordability is important to understand when assessing the amount of current affordable housing and the price point for new units to meet this goal. According to Metropolitan Council 2007 Affordability Limits, the area median income for the seven -county Minneapolis -St. Paul (MSP) area adjusted by HUD to be applicable to a family of four is $78,500 in 2007. Eighty percent of the median household income is $62,800; 60 percent is $47,100 and 50 percent is $39,250. Applying an interest rate on a 30 -year fixed -rate home loan of 6.2 percent for 2007 and other payment factors to the 80 percent area median income, yields an affordable purchase price of $206,800 in 2007. According to Anoka County Assessor's data there are 779 homesteads, or 13 percent of total 2007 households, that fall under this 80 percent purchase price limit in Lino Lakes. The price point for an affordable home at 60 percent of area median income drops to $152,000. There are currently only 82 existing homesteads, or 1 percent of total 2007 households, in Lino Lakes at or below $152,000 (Anoka County assessor's data /GIS). It is the new 60 percent measurement that will be required for the potential affordable housing units anticipated between 2011 -2020 in Lino Lakes. Achieving this new affordability goal will be very difficult without the funding tools that have in the past been offered by the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. Future Affordable Housing Opportunities To provide eppertttnities for affordable housing in the community, the City is taking the appropriate regulatory measures within the Comprehensive Plan by guiding areas for higher density housing and including policies to premete- integrate affordable housing in all residential land use districts. These regulatory measures represent one of the City's most effective tools to eneetirege -for the development of affordable housing. To meet affordable housing goals, the City has planned for potential new growth with a variety of residential and use types and densities for teprertmete the development of life -cycle and affordable housing across the city. The city's future land use plan previd es-the opportunity -te can accommodate the goal of 560 High Density and Mixed Use units at a minimum density of 7 units per net acre by 2020;, which will neatly iflefeaSe opportunities #era€€erdable e 4ife eyele housing in the may. While the City is doing its part in creating a regulatory land use plan to guide areas for higher density housing, which is where most affordable housing will likely occur, barriers to development of affordable housing still exist in Lino Lakes and the region. Some of these barriers are beyond the City's control, including the following: • Steady increases in and prices and construction costs. • Physical limitations of land due to wetlands, poor access, poor soils that would increase the cost of and development or construction. • State, county and local tax structures. There are some significant barriers to construction of new affordable housing, and the above list includes just a few of these barriers. Despite these difficulties, the provision of affordable housing is an important effort that cities undertake. The most effective role Lino Lakes will have in the provision of affordable housing is its regulatory tools, including and use and zoning regulation' that do not impede the construction of affordable housing. Many of these tools can be used to encourage developers. Flexibility, through the use of the Planned Unit Development LPUD) 4 -10 P41 process, may be provided to encourage the construction of affordable housing.; see#es g setback-and-green-area feettrirernents7 increasing dcns,tj ,-er feetteing fccs. Acknowledging the regional housing goals established the the Metropolitan Council does not commit the City of Lino Lakes to provide funding for housing. The City will continue to investigate means to pursue the goals in its comprehensive plan. However, this should not be interpreted as a commitment to use City funds to overcome the financial obstacles to life cycle and affordable housing. Housing Implementation strategies and Recommendations The following Housing Action Plan identifies efforts Lino Lakes will pursue to create opportunities to maintain the existing housing stock, and to provide increased housing options for future residents. These strategies are based on goals and strategies for Community, Neighborhood and Residential development developed by the Citizen Vision Committee, The strategies are designed as a resource tool for specific measures the City can effectively undertake and enforce while others are designed as tools to encourage developers to incorporate affordable housing into future development. As future subdivisions are proposed, the City will use these resources and implement the strategies in working with developers to create new affordable housing opportunities. Many of these items are things the City itself can do, while others will occur through partnerships the City will seek to provide for and maintain housing quality and increase affordable housing opportunities. To ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities (Goal 3), the City will: • Offer incentives to developers who provide for affordable housing units while conserving environmentally sensitive sites, such as density bonuses, expedited permitting processes, or reduced fees. • Pursue funding opportunities to increase the affordability of housing units within conservation subdivisions. • Pursue funding opportunities to incorporate green building techniques within affordable housing developments. • Encourage innovative low impact development to preserve open space or natural features. • Ensure that all new housing, including high density, adheres to the highest possible standards of planning, design and construction feasible. • Promote development of neighborhoods that incorporate housing in a range of densities and affordability limits in close proximity to shopping, services, daycare, and medical services. Safe access to parks and schools, and the ability to walk, bike or have access to transit should be part of the design. To improve the availability of affordable housing and enhance opportunities for senior housing (Goals 5 and 6), the City will: • Seek housing developers to work cooperatively with the City to construct affordable units. Create an incentive based program or Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance that includes density bonuses for construction of affordable housing. This allows an increase in density, beyond the underlying zoning, if the development includes affordable housing. 4411 p4; • • • • • Existing Transit Service This section is a description of existing transit service in the City of Lino Lakes (Figure 6 -16). Lino Lakes is currently served by three transit service providers: • Metro Transit • First Student Anoka County Traveler (ACT) Metro Transit and First Student provide fixed -route transit service. ACT provides demand responsive services. Fixed Route Transit Service Fixed route transit service includes both local and express bus service that operates on a regular schedule and a follow a consistent route. Fixed -route transit service in Lino Lakes is provided by Metro Transit and by First Student under contract to the Metropolitan Council. Table 6 -6 shows the characteristics of the routes serving Lino Lakes. Table 6 -6: Characteristics of the Transit Routes Serving Lino Lakes Route Provider Type Cities Served M -F Hours Sat Hours Sun Hours Frequency 250 Metro Transit Express Lino Lakes, 95th Ave Park & 5 AM — 9 AM 1 PM — 10 PM None None 15 -30 minutes Ride Minneapolis 255 Fifst Student Express Shoreview, St -Paul 6 50•AM Si-20—PM None Nene 30 utcs 3:30fPF 5:10 PM 262 First Student Express Lino Lakes, Blaine, St Paul 5:50 AM — 8:00 PM 4:00PM- None None 30 minutes 6:15 PM 275 First Student Express Lino Lakes, White Bear 6:30 -20 AM — None None 30 minutes 8:30 PMAM Lake, St Paul 4:0010 PM — 6:00 PM Metro Transit operates only one route in the vicinity of Lino Lakes, Route 250, which provides frequent service to downtown Minneapolis and also provides three trips in the `reverse commute' direction in the morning and four in the afternoon. First Student provides service to downtown St. Paul using three routes but less overall service. There are no `reverse commute' runs from downtown St Paul. Route 250 not only provides service to downtown Minneapolis but also provides connections to the Hiawatha LRT line and Metro Transit's entire network of buses operating through the downtown area. Likewise, the First Student express buses provide connections to Metro Transit routes operating through downtown St Paul. P4: 1344 Transit Service and Facilities (it of Lino Lakes MO Comprehensive Flan Park & Ride Lacatici Fis 4Lted 40230 Pi:r E, sA. 6 -40 lIhr( AYES • .: P _!iq ; 'af• RFW �,'c�'� _f ui 4F�m^i:i • • Express Routes Express service, which operates during peak periods, is designed to serve commuters who live in the suburban area and work in the Central Cities, primarily downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul. Most of these routes start at a park and ride and /or transit station and operate closed door to the downtown area. Metro Transit Route 250 Route 250 is an express route that connects the 95th Avenue Transit Station in Blaine to downtown Minneapolis with 28 trips inbound in the morning peak period and 28 trips outbound in the afternoon peak period. Most of the trips originate and terminate at the 95th Avenue Transit Station at the intersection of 95th Avenue and I -35W, and operate closed door to downtown Minneapolis. Three of the runs in the morning begin at the park and ride at the intersection of Naples Street NE and Flowerfield Road in the City of Lexington. Five runs return to this location in the afternoon. Four runs in the morning and four in the afternoon serve a shared use park and ride at Saint Joseph's Church in Lino Lakes. Both of these route variations also serve the 95th Avenue park and ride. Although, only the buses that serve the St Joseph's Church park and ride actually enter the City, Route 250 represents the primary express transit service to downtown Minneapolis for residents of Lino Lakes. Metrepelitart Route 55 isen express route vrit# ee-tfips inbound in -tire morning and 3 -tripseutheund- in#heaferneen: AWef ttie -trips seriginatc nd terminate et-the Wells ere -85t#Avcnuc a -4iee Crcck- ?arkway-and eperatc deertedowntown St Nut. While-net-entering tteL-ityetinepekes; feute -is-en option-fersome tine -Lakes residents -ef the Gi St -Paul: This -feute Metropolitan Council Route 262 Route 2.5S-262 is an express route that connects the 95th Avenue Transit Station to downtown St Paul with three trips inbound in the morning and three trips outbound in the afternoon. All of the trips originate and terminate at the 95th Avenue Transit Station at the intersection of 95th Avenue and I -35W and operate closed door to Little Canada. From Little Canada to downtown St Paul, the bus stops at six intermediate stops along Rice Street. While not entering the City of Lino Lakes, this route is an option for some Lino Lakes residents who live in the southwestern part of the City and commute to St. Paul. This route is currently operated by First Student Inc. Metropolitan Council Route 275 Route 275 is an express route that connects Lino Lakes and Centerville to downtown St Paul, Three morning trips originate at Lino Parkin Lino Lakes and one originates at St. Genevieve Church in Centerville. They operate closed door to downtown St. Paul with two intermediate stops. Three afternoon trips from St. Paul terminate at Lino park, with tbreetripsinboundin -the fnerfting -end three tripseutbeund+f -the afternoon. of e#fips'originate and terminate -at-the-St Genevieve Cat elie£hurch near Centerville-Read- andeperate elesedtleer te downtown-St - at witirtwe intermediate First -Student i►,�,,,�,o� steps in ' "� Beef-Lake: This reuteis eurrentiy'operaied icy -First-Student -Ine, This route is aft option her setae tine takes residents five in-the east-ern -ef the City and fern-mute te Paul-. This reute eurrentty- eperatedby- First-' dent fne 6 -41 P45 Local Routes Local service is designed for short trips within the community or to adjacent communities and is usually provided throughout the day. There is no regular route local bus service in the City of Lino Lakes. Demand Responsive Transit Service Dial -A -Ride Service The Anoka County Traveler offers transit service to all residents of Anoka County who can travel independently (or with a personal care attendant). Services include three fixed routes, operating in the southern part of the County, and dial -a -ride services, which provide connections to the entire County. None of the three fixed routes serve Lino Lakes. The Anoka County Traveler (ACT) Dial -a -Ride is a demand - responsive transit service serving Lino Lakes and other communities in Anoka County. Hours of service vary by community. The dial -a -ride service hours in Lino Lakes are from 5:15 a.m. to 6:45 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on the weekends. The Traveler Dial -a -Ride coordinates with the ACT fixed route service to ensure passengers the most efficient and affordable way to travel. The regular fare for Dial -a -Ride service is $3.25 per person; the peak hour fare is $4.25 per person. ACT uses vehicles that are handicap accessible and can hold up to 18 people. In 2006, ACT Dial -a -Ride provided just over 22,000 rides. ADA Complementary Service In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Metropolitan Council provides specialized, demand responsive service for persons who have disabilities that prevent them from using the regular route system. This service is provided in the same areas that regular route service is provided. In Anoka County, the Council contracts for these services with the Anoka County Traveler Dial - a -Ride service. Within the City of Lino Lakes, ADA complementary service is available from 5:15 a.m. to 6:45 p.m. during the week and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekends. In 2006, ACT Dial -a -Ride provided almost 35,000 ADA rides. Other Services Privately Contracted Regular Routes The Metropolitan Council contracts for about five percent of the regular route service that is provided in the Metropolitan area through contracts with private and non - profit transit providers. Routes 255, 262, and 275 described above are operated under contract to the Metropolitan Council by First Student. Community Based Urban Programs Throughout the region, ten small urban systems operate local transit service in their communities. Many of these services were originally formed to meet a specific mobility need for elderly or disabled, but are now open to the general public. Currently, the City of Lino Lakes does not offer this type of transit service. Community Based Rural Programs Throughout the region, eight rural systems provide a base level of transit service in areas that are not served by regular route service. These programs primarily serve the elderly and persons with disabilities but are open to the general public. As noted above, ACT provides these services for Anoka County, including the City of Lino Lakes. ACT is funded by Performance Based Funding (PBF) grants from the Metropolitan Council, revenue from contract services including the Metro Mobility ADA contract, County contributions, and donations. 6 -41 P4E • • • • • • The Anoka County Volunteer Transportation Program provides rides to and from medical, dental, and appointments with social services for seniors (60 +) and clients receiving services from Anoka County, This service relies on volunteer drivers. While the service is free, donations are encouraged. Medical and dental trips may be made throughout the metro area he appointments with social services must remain within Anoka County= This program is funded primarily through private grants and donations. Existing Transit Facilities This section is a description of existing transit facilities in the City of Lino Lakes (Figure 6 -16). Transit facilities include: • Passenger facilities — Physical infrastructure that is designed for use by passengers while waiting for or boarding buses. Support facilities — Physical infrastructure that is designed to support the operation and maintenance of transit vehicles. ■ Transit Advantages — Physical infrastructure that is designed to provide a travel time advantage for transit vehicles versus automobiles. Transit Passenger and Support Facilities Transit service cannot be provided without a variety of physical facilities. These include passenger facilities that provide an opportunity to board buses. They range from a simple bus stop to large transit centers. Transit support facilities are also essential components of a transit system. Transit vehicle storage and maintenance facilities are almost invisible to the public but critical to the operation of buses. The following park and ride facilities serve residents of Lino Lakes. There -is-ene are two active Park and Ride facility- locations in Lino Lakes; mat St. Joseph Catholic Church7is located at 141 Elm Street. The capacity of this lot is listed as 12 spaces -&ef which - are-beirng ese4. This lot is served by Route 250. The other site Lino Park on Lake Drive, has 20 spaces and is served In Route 275.. There is also an active Park and Ride at St Genevieve Church, 7087 Goiffon Road in Centerville. The capacity of this lot is 50 spaces with 38 spaces being used. This lot is served by Route 275. Although not within the City limits, the most significant Park and Ride facility for residents of Lino Lakes is the Park and Ride at 95th Avenue and I -35W in Blaine. There are 1,011 spaces at this lot, currently the third largest park and ride in the region, 982 of which are being used. Plans are underway to increase the capacity of this Park and Ride. Route 250 provides service to this lot with buses departing for Minneapolis as often as 5 minutes apart during the peak hour. Because of the limited amount of service in the City, the number and type of physical support facilities is also limited. Currently, there are no vehicle storage or maintenance facilities in the City of Lino Lakes nor are there any major layover facilities. Transit Advantages Transit Advantages is a term that describes physical features that provide a travel time advantage over automobiles using the same facility. These include bus -only shoulders, HOV lanes, and ramp -meter bypasses. Transit advantages improve the attractiveness of transit by allowing buses to move faster than automobiles making the same trip, effectively reducing the travel time for transit patrons relative to automobile users. BUS -ONLY SHOULDERS P47 Bus -Only Shoulders (BOS) allow buses to use the roadway shoulder to bypass automobiles that are in the general flow of traffic. They may only be used when the speed in the regular lanes drops to 30 mph or lower. BOS shoulders are useful in those areas where there is chronic peak period congestion and increase the attractiveness of peak hour express buses by allowing express buses to maintain a minimum speed through congested areas. Bus -only shoulders in both directions have been established on I -35W from 95th Avenue south to Minneapolis. The Route 250 express buses operated by Metro Transit to downtown Minneapolis utilize these bus -only shoulders. Bus -only shoulders have been established on I -35E from TH 36 to downtown St Paul. Routes 25' and 275, operated by First Student, utilizes these BOS lanes. High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes are roadway lanes reserved for cars with 2 or more people, motorcycles and transit vehicles. They provide a travel time incentive for people willing to carpool or use transit. At present, there are no HOV lanes in Lino Lakes or on routes to either downtown. Transit Programs This section is a description of existing transit programs in the City of Lino Lakes. Ride Matching Services Lino Lakes residents are eligible to participate in the regional car pool matching database managed by the Met Council. Carpool participants qualify for the regional guaranteed ride home program; may use High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and meter bypass ramps; receive parking discounts in some circumstances; may participate in occasional promotional benefits. Van -Go Lino Lakes residents are also eligible to participate in the Van -GO! program, a regional vanpool program sponsored by the Metropolitan Council. Van -GO! vanpools are made up of 5 to 15 commuters picked up along the vanpool route or at an agreed upon location. Like buses and carpools, vanpools are eligible to use meter bypass lanes or ramps and HOV lanes. Travel Demand Management Travel Demand Management (TDM) services include programs that promote and support any alternative to commuting via single- occupant vehicle. It may include ride - matching, car -pool and van -pool services as previously described, both covers many other options as well. Transit promotions, employer - subsidized bus passes, flexible work hours, and telecommuting are just some of the possible strategies to reduce SOV use. Metro Transit provides a regional service through its Metro Commuter Services group, and four local Transportation Management Organizations provide further support and services, including two downtown organizations. The City and employers may use these services and programs free of charge in order to benefit employee' travel arrangements and budgets. Future Transit Demand According to the 2005 Metropolitan Council's Park - and -Ride Plan, the number of people in Lino Lakes currently utilizing transit to commute to work in downtown Minneapolis /St. Paul is expected to increase through 2030. Although the percentage of the Lino Lakes resident workforce utilizing transit services within the city is relatively small compared to future population projections, there are other park- and -ride facilities outside of city limits that may also draw a small portion of the Lino Lakes commuter workforce because of the higher bus frequencies and routes along with a greater number of downtown express buses they offer. 6 -44 P4E • • • • • • The information presented in Table 6-7 and Table 6 -8 is based on data in the 2005 document. They show the number andFperccntage of Lino Lakes residents projected to utilize commute to work in the Minneapolis and St. Paul downtown areas in 2010, 2020 and 2030. The tables also include projections of the number and percentage of those commuters who will use transit. As evident by the tables below, the majority of the workforce utilizing the transit services is commuting into Minneapolis. The 2005 Park - And -Ride Plan is based on 2000 census data. More recent Metropolitan Council modeling using 2008 park and ride usage data indicates that the number of transit users increased in recent years. This would mean that current transit use is higher than was previously proiected and, in turn future demand likely will be_higher as well. Table 6 -8. Lino Lakes Transit (Utilization to/from St. Paul 2010 2020 2030 Number of commuters from Lino 764 989 1107 Lakes to downtown Minneapolis Number of downtown commuters 129 160 238 using transit using transit Percentage of downtown Percentage of downtown 17% 16% 21% commuters using transit Perc-entage volume of ing- 8:14'o Perch age +rekUtne-ef izing transit- ies 07S-% 97540 8:7 -ok reside ac and scr vices Number of residents-utilizing 129 169 238 Table 6 -8. Lino Lakes Transit (Utilization to/from St. Paul Transit Improvement Strategies The regional transit goal for the Twin Cities metropolitan area is to double ridership by 2030. Transit needs and strategies for the metropolitan area as a whole were identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework (2004) and Transportation Policy Flan (2004). The Council proposes three key transit strategies: 1. Respond to various future transit needs in the region's different transit markets. 6 -45 P49 2010 2020 2030 Number of commuters from Lino 461 501 530 Lakes to downtown St. Paul Number of downtown commuters 27 4 33 s 44 using transit Percentage of downtown 6% 7o o 8°/o commuters using transit Perc-entage volume of ing- 8:14'o 04 D/0 0711Yo residents- rns aciI ties end Nurser of - esidents-utitizing transit faeilitics-andserviees 27 33 44 Transit Improvement Strategies The regional transit goal for the Twin Cities metropolitan area is to double ridership by 2030. Transit needs and strategies for the metropolitan area as a whole were identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework (2004) and Transportation Policy Flan (2004). The Council proposes three key transit strategies: 1. Respond to various future transit needs in the region's different transit markets. 6 -45 P49 meter bypasses. I -35W from Lino Lakes to downtown Minneapolis is one of the express bus corridors identified by the Council. Transitways The Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan includes a proposal for adding several new transitways in the region, The Rush Line Corridor, which passes just east of Lino Lakes, is listed as a Tier II Corridor, Planning studies are underway to determine the best approach to providing enhanced transit service in this corridor, The Urban Partnership Agreements for accelerated federal funding of key transportation projects includes funding for the expansion of the I -35W /05th Avenue park - and -ride. This will have a direct impact on commuters from the Lino Lakes area because this park and ride is the City's primary location for utilizing express bus service to downtown Minneapolis. The City remains concerned, however, that mobility in and around the inner suburbs and the urban core will be negatively impacted by lack of any further progress on transportation funding and capacity improvement projects. Lino Lakes recommends and supports an aggressive approach to transit expansion projects and funding mechanisms that will materially reduce congestion, improve urban mobility, and bolster our Minnesota economy and lifestyle. This approach is consistent with the following goals and strategies identified in the beginning of this transportation plan: Goal 3, Policy 4 — "Develop mass transit options to serve growing transportation demands" Goal 5, Policy 1 —"Plan for and develop park - and -ride opportunities that are adjacent to our arterial roadways" Goal 5, Policy 3 — "In cooperation with Anoka County and other local units of government pursue state and federal funding for mass transit" Goal 6, Po /icy 1 —"Support the planning and development of the established Rush Line transit corridor (rail and bus) from the central cities through Hugo" Goal 6, Policy 2 — "Provide local transit opportunities to access the Rush Line corridor" Goal 6, Po /icy 3 — "Continue to work with Metro Transit to provide and expand safe, affordable and efficient public transit" Park - and -Rides The Metropolitan Council's Regional Park -and -Ride Plan (2005) indicates that a new facility in the vicinity of I -35E and CSAH 14 should be considered, with an anticipated capacity of 600-2004- spaces by 2030. Land Use Planning Land use planning, including trails and pedestrian amenities, play a crucial role in the success of transit in a community. Adequate and safe sidewalks, bus stops, shelters, and transfer or waiting facilities all are necessary components of a convenient and successful transit system. Mixed -use developments and other Transit Oriented Development (TOD) around developing and redeveloped areas are also key to future effective transit options. Recommendations The City of Lino Lakes benefits from the presence of a high - quality county-based provider, ACT, and Anoka County's active planning and management of future transit facilities and programs. The City should continue to be supportive and fully engaged in these programs and organizations to insure a high level of transit service in the City. As part of economic development activities, Lino Lakes should inform and enlist the cooperation of existing and new employers in TDM measures, including specifically transit promotion and transit 6 -47 P5( • • • • Table 7 -1. Summary Of Development Projections Through 2030 Dist. Sub -Dist. Residential Units Commercial / Industrial Existing Sewered ISTS Hook- ups Projected New Units Total Sewered Units - 2030 Projected New Employment 1 1A 310 26 122126 4442Q 132137 4.584J2_ 55 1B 820 38 22 470291038 154159 0 45 1C 1D 580 31 7 158,E 515_4_ 134142 769777 0 0 0 0 1E 586 4914,E 60 1F 350 7 60 1G 0 1H 200 28 0 228 41 1 Sub -Total 2,260 219 768805 3,2473284 141 2 2A 2B 325 0 247 828 148158 820.— 720,x_ 0 0 411 2C 0 0 0 2D 33 0 33 0 2E 150 32 6 188 20 2F 860 207 220 1,287 220 2G 125 0 4 129 0 2H 150 24 0 174 73 2I 100 30 1,0851018 1151148 37 23 0 124129 124129 0 2 Sub -Total 1,710 573 176691620 3,9523903 761 3 3A 440 3 78 1,2431219 450551 1,2521228 686 995 0 3B 9 19 352381 3C 333 6 2 3D 6 907 96103 0 3E 0 0 0 0 3F 40 0 0 40 0 3G 2 174171 176= 2,3662376 35 1,716 3 Sub -Total 480 39 178471857 4 4A 17 2566254 273271 54 4B 0 0 0 0 4C 0 0 0 0 4D 2 6064 6266 0 4E 75 0 75 0 4 Sub -Total 0 94 316318 440412 54 5 5A 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,408 0 5B 5C 0 0 0 0 5 Sub -Total 0 0 0 0 1408 TOTAL 4,450 925 _ 4600 9,975 4,080 Plus correctional fac lity (Sub - District 2E) assumed equivalent to 500 residential units TOTAL 4,950 10,475 4,080 P51 The third task involved providing guidance and information on future trunk sewers and lift stations that will be necessary to accommodate the City's anticipated growth and development. This included reviewing and updating the City's proposed land -use and staged development map, estimating the number of housing units and commercial /industrial properties in the future development sites, and providing solutions for the connection of new lateral sewers to the existing trunk sewer system. The general alignment of new trunk sewers and lift station locations was determined. Each lift station's general service area was identified. The final task was the preparation of a Plan document summarizing the findings of this investigation and formulating recommendations to the City Council. Lino Lakes Demographic Profile and Forecasts Background The community of Lino Lakes anticipates significant growth in upcoming years. Planning for growth poses significant opportunities and challenges for the community. The City's land use plan is an important tool to ensure that the City is adequately prepared to respond to these opportunities and challenges. The land use plan plays a key role in managing growth within the City. The land use plan builds on the plan vision, goals, and strategies to establish a policy framework in which future development will occur. The future land use map is also used to estimate the community's capacity to accommodate projected household and employment growth. Sewer, water, and transportation infrastructure plans are based on the forecasts and development information presented in the land use plan. Figure 7 -3 shows the existing sanitary sewer system and proposed future trunk sewers superimposed over the proposed Future Land Use Plan. Chapter 3: Land Use includes a more detailed discussion of land use and development trends. Past Growth Trends The population of Lino Lakes has grown from 8,807 in 1990 to 16,791 in 2000, an annual increase of 6.7 percent. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the 2005 population of Lino Lakes was 19,698 while the number of households was 5,729. These figures represent annual increases (since 1990) of 5.5 percent in population and 5.4 percent in the number of households. Forecasts Detailed forecasts of land use, population, and employment are included in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. These forecasts, broken out by sewer planning districts, are briefly summarized below. Existing development by district, as of 2008, is also summarized. District boundaries are shown on Figure 7 -2. Forecasts by Sewer Districts Sewer District 1 Sewer District 1 is located in the southwest corner of the City. A significant portion of District 1 is currently developed. As of 2008, District 1 contains approximately 2,260 sewered single family residential units and 350 un- sewered units. There are about 740 developable acres in District 1 currently designated as low density sewered residential, 82 acres designated as medium density residential, 21 acres designated as mixed use - residential, 12 acres designated mixed use - commercial, and 7 acres designated commercial. Psi • • • • • • The residential areas, including undeveloped lots in the existing subdivisions, are projected to accommodate about 779805 new residential units by 2030. In addition, approximately 220 existing homes with on -site systems are projected to connect to the sewer system by 2030. The total number of sewered residences in District 1 would then be about 3,2593,284 units in 2030. In addition, the commercial and mixed use areas will support approximately 140 new employees by 2030, Sewer District 2 Sewer District 2 is located in the northwest corner of the City. This area consists of a mixture of urban and rural land uses. District 2 currently contains about 1,710 sewered residential units, 1,085 un- sewered units, and 185 vacant lots in existing developments. This District also contains about 1,220 developable acres designated as low density residential. There are also about 231 developable acres designated as medium density residential, 114 developable acres designated as high density residential, and 60 acres designated as mixed use residential. In total, these areas are projected to support approximately 176791 620 new residential units by 2030. In addition, District 2 includes the Lino Lakes Correctional Facility. The Correctional Facility houses approximately 1,200 residents, equivalent to about 500 single family residential units. In total, assuming approximately 570 existing un- sewered residential areas receive service, District 2 could contain the equivalent of about 1,1504,403 sewered residential units in 2030. District 2 also includes extensive existing commercial and industrial area, as well as approximately 108 developable acres designated commercial, 23 developable acres designated as industrial, and 16 acres designated mixed use - commercial. Projected new employment in the commercial, industrial and mixed use areas totals about 760 employees by 2030. Sewer District 3 Sewer District 3 is located on the east side of the City, generally east of Centerville. District 3 also includes sub - district 3F, two small developed areas totaling about 40 homes in the Lamotte Drive area and at the west end of Mound Trail on the north side of Centerville Lake. Sub - district 3F is served by an interconnection to the Centerville sanitary sewer system and by MCES lift station L- 4. Existing sewered areas of District 3 contain about 480 existing single family residences, and a few commercial properties. The District also includes about 100 unsewered residences. District 3 contains approximately 247 acres of developable land designated as low density residential; 207 developable acres designated medium density residential; 25 developable acres high density residential; and 302 developable acres designated as mixed use residential. In total, these areas are projected to support approximately 1,8501.857 new residential units by 2030. Assuming 40 existing unsewered residences receive service, total sewered residential development in District 3 is projected to be approximately 27792,376 units by 2030. District 3 also includes approximately 104 developable acres designated commercial, 122 acres designated industrial, and 67 acres designated mixed use - commercial. Total new employment in these areas is projected to be approximately 1,720 employees by 2030. Sewer District 4 Sewer District 4 is located in southeastern Lino Lakes, bordering on North Oaks and White Bear Township. There is no existing sewered development in District 4. There are about 140 existing non - sewered residences. District 4 contains approximately 597 developable acres designated low density residential, 48 acres medium density, 9 acres high density, and 20 acres mixed use residential. Most areas of District 4 will probably not be developed by 2030, Projected development by 2030 includes about 329 318 new residential units, In addition, 90 existing units are projected to receive service, resulting in about 4199412 sewered units in District 4 by 2030. In addition, District 4 contains approximately 11 acres designated as mixed use commerci&, which could support about 50 employees by 2030. 7 -10 P52 Tab 3. Su j of Projected Flows - 2015 All Flo in Millions of Gallons Per Day (MGD) Dist. -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaki >. ctor Pe = Flow Resid tial Non- Residential Total 0.364 0.08 0.002 0.091 4.000 ,4 1B 0.197 0.000 0.197 3.800 0749 1C 0.029 0.002 0,03 4.0 ' " All 0.124 0.644 ' 1D h 0.165 0.000 Cr C 's r•.112 - All 0 ' '0 1E L ,0.000 0.000 0.000 1F lift ,., 2 0. 1.000 0.448 1G I 100 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.0 I p ' 0.038 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.6 0. ei . 0.650 3.300 2.145 0. I 0. 2 2A 0.000 0.000 ' 0.000 0.000 2B 0.182 0.041 3.800 0.847 2C 0.000 IIL- " <. 0.000 0.000 0.000 20 0.009 IP ' Iv _. 0 .001 _ „' Mil 0. • • ' m., lti 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 ? Win olt 1 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0. • • , 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0 .03 • E: 0.042 4,000 0.168 2I 0. a =► : 0.131 3.900 0.511 23 Illr .000 .,'; .000 '.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.087 .918 „ _ ° 00 2.938 3 3A r .098 0.027 ;''' "; -. ` 0.488 3B 0.132 0.048 3.•t; 11111 0.702 3C 0.046 0.000 0. E 0.000 , 4.1 e. ' 0.000 ' -- , 0.184 3D 0.11 ' 0.000 0.000 0 R. ° 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 11111 3G . ' ' 0 0,000 0.011 '000 " 0,044 0.000 0.000 b.000 .000 Subtotal 0.287 0.075 0.362 1600 03 0.039 0.000 0.1 6 0.00 4 4A ,_, , , 0.037 0 002 4.0: 0.00 . r 4 E, j 0.000 0 .000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 ` W 4110 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 ...I 0.058 0.002 0.060 4.000 0.240 5 ' 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 56 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 6.722 • • • • Tab ? -4. Summ of Projected Flows -2020 All Flo n Millions Mons Per Day (MGD) Dist. S ist. Average Daily Flow Pea Fa eak Flow Res' al Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.089 0.002 0.091 4.000 0.364 1B 0.197 0.000 0.197 0.0 3.800 0.749 1C 0.029 0.002 0.124 1D h, 0.165 0.000 - ... Mil 0.644 1E 1F . t000 _ s 12 0. 16 0.000 r►';'l00 , 1 f 0.000 jpoo r. .000 1 0.448 noo i .016 4.000 0.064 0.0 0.1'i :' 0.038 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.6 0.1''. . 0.650 3.300 2 2A 10 0.000 1 ,. 4.000 11 :: 213 0.198 0.041 3.800 0.908 2C 0,000 �`.,., 0.000 II 0.000 0.000 0.009 , `. 111 Mill .9 4.000 0.036 0,045 0.004 4.000 0.196 0.410 r. . • 1 3 4 r; '';� 1 / . 1 0.• •" 3.500 1.554 0.016 J.004 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 (' 003 4.000 0.168 2I I • ' r -1 0.1 0.550 IMMO Subtotal 0.1 ` '.0), 0 '487 0.01' ., .966 0.000 0.000 I 3.200 3.091 36 3C W 0.232 0.048 , 4 :!, If Fr 1 1• 1 0.000 k'c1 0.364 0.00f """ 0.000 0. 0.•• 0.000 0.00 1 1 f! 0,00► 1 !•1 ,' 1 0.000 0.01 0.000 0.011 . 111 114' 11117 0,00; 0.000 0.000 t 0.000 0.000 Ilir .Arel . 0.075 0.507 3.400 1.724 4 ! _` ' `043 111 0.180 0.002 0.045 r '° : 0.000 0.000 ! 111 000 1.000 MI/ .` 4C 0.000 0.000 1 111 0 1 111 • t 0.010 1 111 0.010 F,, ,:0 0.0 .'N _ia 4E 4 0.021 0.000 0.021 I I C ••.1A 0.074 ,0 11 . Ifi � 4.000 0.304r .IMF ' N 0.000 0.024 0.024 0.096 . 0.000 0.000 0.000 • 0.000 L L 5C 0.000 0.000 0,000 0,000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 ~�L'�.►3J• L 7.360 7 -14 P5! Ta -5. Sum of Projected Flows - 2025 All F in Million' allons Per Day (MGD) Dist. Dist. Average Daily Flow Pe • g Factor eak Flow Resid -; tial 1 Non Residential Total 1 _ � . ,- 1A 0.0. 0.002 0.091 4.000 0.364 1B 0.21 1 0.000 0,2 3 :; 0.825 1C 0.044 0.002 0.► 40 0.184 1D 0.171 0.000 ! '00 0.667 j 0.000 1E 4 0.000 000 �, . . q , 0.000 a .000 _ 1F 1.000 0.125 3.900 0.488 1G ,25 0. d, 400 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0,0 44 12 0.03r 4.000 0.152 2.323 Subtotal _ 0.69 i0 ' ': 0.7 e : A 3300 0.088 Y 4.000 2 2A 0.022 0 2B 0.198 0.041 i Aill 3.800 0.908 2C 0.000 , 0.000 0 i 00 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 `'. 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 op , 0.004 +.055 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 1 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 4 0 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0. 4.000 0.168 21 0.296 ,_ ; " ` " 0.2-:' 3.700 1 103 23 0,0 0.04 , 0.000 0.000 Subtotal fir' . ,- ' +88 1.137 `' 3.100 3.525 3.900 0.488 3 3A 098 '+ .027 >4125 a 3B ,:,.290 0.048 38 .600 1.217 3C ' 0.096 0,000 196,, ri a • 0384 0.104 3D 0.026 0.000 0.' 0,000 O,e' • 0.000 3E 0.000 3F 0.01 0,000 0.0 4.1 0.044 3r: 0.0 ; 0.000 0.000 0.41'4 0.000 r l 0.5 0.075 0.596 3.400 2.026 +48 0,002 0.050 4.000 1 0.200 4.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ! 4,4 a 0.000 -..`' 4D 0.017 0.000 0.017 , 068 ~ 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4 ;4 r , -:4 Subtotal 0.086 0.002 0.088 4.4' =` ' i -'- 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.004 0.224 0.000 `:: ii89(iit _ 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0,224 Total 8,450 7 -15 P5E • • • • of Projected Flows - 2030 dons Per Day (MGD) Dist. b -Di _ Average Daily Flow Pa• g Fa s Peak Flow Resi • ial Non- Residential Total , n 0.364 1A 0.089 0.002 0.091 4.000 16 .217 0.000 0.21 3.80 0.825 1C .0.044 0.002 0.' 4 ! i' 0.184 � 1D 0.177 0.000 r ` ' .016 '00 0.690 1E Q.016 0.000 000 .000 0.064 1F 5 0.125 ' 3.900 0.488 1G 0. 1 ; ' 0 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.0 " O. i 0.038 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.72 ' 0. ' ' 0.726 3300 2.396 2A 0.022 0.000 ` 0.0 4.000 0.088 2B 0.198 0.041 3.700 0.884 2C 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 ..009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 • MIll 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 °, 0.034 0. 71111 0.0" 7 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0., t . a " A 1111 /1 0.. 1 03 0.034 4.000 0.168 2I 031. 0.0 3.600 1.152 23 4.000 0.136 Subtotal � .j ' �- i 88 1.193 3.100 3.698 ® 3A ' 098 ,0.342 0.027 125 .900 0.488 36 , ° r" 0.096 0 02•' 0.048 ' 390 1 600 1.404 3C 0.000 IL 0 0.384 3D 0.000 0., 0.104 3E 3F 0 000 4 0.01 0.000 0.1 + 0.000: 0.000 0.000 0.011 4.000 '' 0.044 , y All 0.001 0.049 4.000 0.196 4 ► to l Am 0.076 0.697 `°_. 3.300 2.300 IIIIIMP i " A .075 0.002 0.077 i' y 4.000 0.308 _r. 4B ' 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 b.000 s x.000 0.000 0.000 0!e0 f 00 4D ': 0.017 0.000 0.017`0. 8 0.4 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.•6 Subtota 0.113 0.002 0.115 4.001 0.460 ;• : 0.000 0.056 0.05E 4.000 ` F.. „ ° 0.000 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 9.078. J 7 -16 1357 TABLE 7 -3 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS - 2015 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.199 0.000 0.199 3.800 0.756 1C 0.030 0.002 0.032 4.000 0.128 10 0.167 0.000 0.167 3.900 0.651 1E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.114 0.000 0.114 4.000 0.456 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.652 0.006 0.658 3.300 2.171 2 2A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2B 0.185 0.041 0.226 3.800 0.859 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 0.004 0.049 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 0.034 0.444 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.125 0.001 0.126 3.900 0.491 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.829 0.087 0.916 3.200 2.931 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.129 0.048 0.177 3.900 0.690 3C 0.050 0.000 0.050 4.000 0.200 3D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.288 0.075 0.363 3.600 1.307 4 4A 0.034 0.002 0.036 4.000 0.144 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.055 0.002 0.057 4.000 0.228 5 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.024 0,024 4.000 0.096 Total 6.733 7 -13 P5E • • • • • TABLE 7 -4 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS -2020 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.199 0.000 0.199 3.800 0.756 1C 0.030 0.002 0.032 4.000 0.128 1D 0.167 0.000 0.167 3.900 0.651 1E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.114 0.000 0.114 4.000 0.456 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.652 0.006 0.658 3.300 2.171 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.198 0.041 0.239 3.800 0.908 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 0.004 0.049 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 0.034 0.444 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.135 0.001 0.136 3.900 0.530 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.875 0.087 0.962 3.200 3.078 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.227 0.048 0.275 3.700 1.018 3C 0.099 0.000 0.099 4.000 0.396 3D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.435 0.075 0.510 3.400 1.734 4 4A 0.041 0.002 0.043 4.000 0.172 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.073 0.002 0.075 4.000 0.300 5 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 7.380 7 -14 p5c TABLE 7 -5. SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS - 2025 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist Sub -Dist Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non Residential Residential Total 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.220 0.000 0.220 3.800 0.836 1C 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 1D 0.173 0.000 0.173 3.900 0.675 1E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.128 0.000 0.128 3.900 0.499 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.709 0.006 0.715 3.300 2.360 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.201 0.041 0.242 3.800 0.920 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 0.055 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 0.452 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.276 0.002 0.278 3.700 1.029 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 1.033 0.088 1.121 3.100 3.475 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.280 0.048 0.328 3.600 1.181 3C 0.104 0.000 0.104 4.000 0.416 3D 0.028 0.000 0.028 4.000 0.112 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.521 0.075 0.596 3.400 2.026 4 4A 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.018 0.000 0.018 4.000 0.072 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.085 0.002 0.087 4.000 0.348 5 5A 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 8.433 7 15 P6( • • • • • TABLE 7 -6. SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS -2030 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.220 0.000 0.220 3.800 0.836 1C 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 1D 0.179 0.000 0.179 3.900 0.698 1E 0.017 0.000 0.017 4.000 0.068 1F 0.128 0.000 0.128 3.900 0.499 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.732 0.006 0.738 3.300 2.435 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.201 0.041 0.242 3.700 0.895 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 0.055 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 0.452 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.299 0.002 0.301 3.600 1.084 2J 0.035 0.000 0.035 4.000 0.140 Sub -Total 1.091 0.088 1.179 3.100 3.655 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.336 0.048 0.384 3.600 1.382 3C 0.104 0.000 0.104 4.000 0.416 3D 0.028 0.000 0.028 4.000 0.112 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.047 0.001 0.048 4.000 0.192 Sub -Total 0.624 0.076 0.700 3.300 2.310 4 4A 0.074 0.002 0.076 4.000 0.304 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.018 0.000 0.018 4.000 0.072 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.113 0.002 0.115 4.000 0.460 5 5A 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 9.084 7 -16 P61 • AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine MEETING DATE: May 23, 2011 TOPIC: Consider Approval of Resolution No. 11 -53, Accepting Redevelopment Task Force Workbook VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: The Lino Lakes City Council requested that the Lino Lakes Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) act as a Redevelopment Task Force to study issues surrounding underused and nonconforming properties in the City. EDAC studied the issues and completed a draft of its workbook with recommendations for council consideration. In formulating a direction to study underused, nonconforming and vacant properties in • Lino Lakes, EDAC determined it was necessary to: 1. Identify the properties 2. Determine the impact these properties have on the City's tax base 3. Determine the impediments that prevent the properties from being used or redeveloped 4. Determine what actions — whether through regulatory change, financial incentives, public investment, or marketing assistance —could be proposed that would benefit the City and create an environment that supported continued stabilization of the City's commercial /industrial tax base. • Property Identification Staff completed an initial inventory of commercial and industrial properties on Lake Drive and Hodgson Road, the two major corridors where the majority of properties are either guided, zoned or historically have been used for commercial /industrial purposes. An initial inventory resulted in 163 properties. After eliminating all vacant parcels and single family homes, 83 parcels remained. Of those, only six are developed with an existing use that is currently nonconforming to the zoning ordinance. More notable is that fact that 38 (46 %) of those properties are served by private wells. Since access to water is key to installation of a fire suppression system, and such a system is required if the use in a building changes, the lack of city infrastructure is a greater impediment to reuse or redevelopment than the issue of nonconformities. Therefore the final inventory focused on 23 properties that are a substantial distance from water mains and therefore are the greatest challenge to redevelop over time. Of those properties, four are currently delinquent on property taxes and two are vacant. Market Analysis City taxes from all commercial and industrial properties in Lino Lake amounts to $1,645,000. City taxes from all properties inventoried is approximately $65,000. Staff performed a subjective assessment of properties that are either currently vacant or have an increased likelihood of becoming vacant in the future. If all those properties were to cease paying taxes, the City would lose approximately $19,000 in taxes annually. This is approximately 1.2% of the City portion of all commercial and industrial properties in the City. Impediments to Redevelopment/Reuse of Properties The purpose of non - conforming regulations is twofold. It guarantees a property owner rights to continue the use the site. It also provides a mechanism to eventually spur redevelopment of a site with a use that is appropriate with current city regulations should that use be discontinued. • Use: in general, non - conformity of a use occurs when the use is discontinued for a period of one year. Any subsequent use must be conforming to current regulatory standards. • Building: Non - conforming buildings are usually the result of changes to architectural standards and setbacks. The buildings may continue to be used, however, if the use changes, the city requires that the building continue to meet all building and fire code requirements. • Site: non - conforming sites are usually the result of changes to parking, setbacks or lot size requirements. Any change in use requires bringing the lot into conformance with current standards. • Infrastructure: the city's fire code requires that most commercial /industrial buildings over 2,000 sq. ft. have a fire suppression system. It is costly for sites that do not have access to public utilities to address this issue through on -site private well fire suppression. Through the inventory of sites completed by the task force, it became clear this was a major impediment to the sale and reuse of buildings along the Lake Drive and Hodgson Road corridors where utilities are not available. Action Steps EDAC has identified courses of action the City could take in regards to nonconforming uses and properties that are underserviced, zoned, guided or used as commercial /industrial and don't have immediate access to infrastructure: P6; • • • Action 1: Allow market forces to determine the redevelopment of nonconforming III properties. • • Action 2: Expedite the redevelopment of nonconforming properties by providing funding sources for the acquisition of priority properties as they become available; extend utilities to developable sites; provide business loans for special assessments or rehabilitation. This requires the City Council to determine it wants to make a financial commitment to redevelopment and how those funds can be made available. Options available for the City Council to consider: • Tax Increment Financing • Tax Abatement • Special Assessments imposed upon the property owner(s) to pay for improvements that benefit the property • Establishing sewer /water funding for economic development zones • Developing a policy of using pooled TIF for a revolving economic development fund. This allows 20% or 25% of total new increment from TIF districts to be spent outside the boundaries of the TIF district • Encourage private equity in the form of an Economic Development Corporation Other options to provide public funding sources to spur public investment in private development entail an additional tax levy including: • Anoka County HRA levy • Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) levy Action 3: Consider changes to zoning ordinances to allow uses within commercial /industrial zones which are not currently allowed. To implement the draft Comprehensive Plan, staff is reviewing city ordinances and evaluating existing allowable uses in the commercial and industrial zones. EDAC Recommendation EDAC's Redevelopment Task Force recommends that the City Council pursue Actions 2 and 3. Action 2: While EDAC recognizes that market forces will play a major factor in future redevelopment of properties on Lake Drive and Hodgson Road, EDAC encourages the City to take a proactive role in redevelopment to encourage private investment. This includes the City making best use of financial tools available. Action 3: EDAC recommends that once the Comprehensive Plan is passed by the City Council, that the City examine its commercial /industrial zoning ordinances. Consider PEA opportunities for changes and /or additional zoning categories that would allow flexibility within commercial /industrial areas of the City without compromising the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These proposed changes will be reviewed by EDAC, the Planning & Zoning Board and City Council before adoption. Council Options: 1, Accept the Task Force report 2. Direct Staff and Planning & Zoning Board to evaluate current commercial and industrial zoning while revising and updating the City's zoning ordinance as part of the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Consider appropriate measures to provide flexibility within commercial and industrial areas of the City, in particular properties that have no access to public utilities. 3. Make use of all tools available to leverage public investment in private redevelopment of commercial and industrial properties. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 11 -53, accepting the Redevelopment Task Force Report. 2. Deny Resolution No. 11 -53. Pa! • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -53 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") requested that the Economic Development Advisory Board ( "EDAC ") act as a Redevelopment Task Force to study the issues of nonconforming properties in the City; and WHEREAS, EDAC determined its objective was to consider whether City ordinances regarding nonconforming properties impede achieving EDAC's goal of stabilizing the City's tax base; and WHEREAS, EDAC examined the issues surrounding nonconformities within the City and developed recommendations for Council consideration to address nonconformities; and . WHEREAS, EDAC completed a final report entitled Redevelopment Task Force Workbook. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City Council accepts the Redevelopment Task Force Workbook. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 23`h day of May, 2011. ATTEST: • City Clerk Mayor P6E • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6C Michael Grochala May 23, 2011 Consideration of Resolution No. 11 -52 Authorizing Report on Improvements, Otter Lake Road and Utility Extension ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND Over the past three years city staff has been working with property owners along the northeast quadrant of I -35E and Main Street to facilitate the northerly extension of Otter Lake Road. In March of 2011 MFC Properties presented a development concept to the City Council for property located northeast of the Otter Lake Road /Main Street intersection. MFC Properties subsequently submitted a petition, dated April 2, 2011, requesting the preparation of a feasibility study and installation of roadway, water main and sanitary sewer improvements to service pending development. As shown in the attached exhibit Otter Lake Road is ultimately proposed to be extended northerly and connect with Elm Street approximately one mile north of Main Street. When completed this roadway will provide access to developing commercial and industrial properties and service as the principal north /south transportation route in the eastern portion of the city. It is possible that in the future the jurisdiction of this roadway will be transferred to Anoka County. Otter Lake Road, south of Main Street is currently on the county system (CR 84). At this time the proposed improvements consist mainly of the extension of trunk utilities and approximately 360 feet of roadway. Sanitary sewer and water currently exist at the north side of the Main and Otter Lake intersection. However, due to sanitary sewer capacity constraints the properties Tying north of Main Street will be served through the new East Lino Interceptor located approximately 1/4 mile to the east. Accordingly, trunk sanitary sewer will likely be extended from Elmcrest to Otter Lake Road and then, along with water main, be extended the length of the proposed road. It is anticipated that all or a portion of the costs of any proposed improvement will be specially assessed against the benefiting properties. Accordingly the project must conform to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the City Charter, if applicable. The proposed study area includes both City Charter governed areas and a Charter exempt area. However, it is anticipated that the special assessments and improvements for this project will be limited to properties within the Charter exempt area. Therefore the Charter requirements regarding special assessments are not III applicable to this project. In accordance with Chapter 429 the City's first step in initiating the improvement process is to order the preparation of a report on improvements. The report will include a general design layout, cost estimates and probable impacts to benefitting property owners and recommended scope of improvements. While the proposed report will focus primarily on the trunk improvements mention above and the minor roadway extension the entire corridor to Elmcrest Avenue will be evaluated as part of the project. This is necessary to evaluate the alignment and location of the ultimate roadway and utility corridors, identify environmental considerations that could impact the improvements and provide abutting property owners with information regarding future improvements. Accordingly the study will include a review of the plans and costs separated into three areas. Area No. 1, as mentioned above, includes the first 360 feet north of Main Street. Area No. 2 will run from 360 feet to 1320 feet north of Main Street. Area No. 3 will cover the balance of the roadway corridor up to its intersection with Elmcrest Avenue. The city has received a proposal from the City Engineer, TKDA, to complete the report. TKDA is proposing to prepare the report for an estimated cost of $21,000. Interim funding for the study will be provided from the City's Area and Unit Trunk Utility Fund. These cost will be incorporated into the special assessments for the project if the project proceeds to construction. RECOMMENDATION While a petition was received for the proposed improvements staff is recommending that the council proceed with the project as a City initiated project. This provides additional flexibility in the scope of improvements based on the outcome of the feasibility study. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 11 -52. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 11 -52 2. Petition for Improvements 3. General Location Map 2 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -52 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OTTER LAKE ROAD AND UTILITY EXTENSION WHEREAS, it is proposed to; 1) construct sanitary sewer along the north side of Main Street (CSAH 14) from Elmcrest Avenue to Otter Lake Road'; and 2) improve Otter Lake Road between the Main Street (CSAH 14) and a point approximately 1,320 feet north by roadway, pedestrian /bicycle trail, storm water management, sanitary sewer, water main, landscaping and traffic control signal improvements and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to evaluate the entire future corridor of Otter Lake Road from Main Street to its intersection with Elmcrest, approximately one mile north of Main Street (CSAH 14), for planning purposes; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: • That the proposed improvement, called the Otter Lake Road and Utility Extension Project be referred to TKDA, City Engineer, for study and that that person is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. ATTEST: Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of May 2011. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: 3 The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 • • • • • • PETITION FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The undersigned makes the following petition to the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes: A. CM PROPERTIES 14, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Owner ") represents that it is the sole fee owner of the property (the "Property ") located in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, legally described in the attached Exhibit A. B. For the purposes of their development, the Owners desire, and hereby request, that the Lino Lakes City Council: 1. Order the preparation of a feasibility study pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the improvements defined below as the Project (the "Feasibility Study "). 2. Order and cause the construction of the City improvements: (a) sanitary sewer; (b) water line; and (c) roadway improvements to extend Otter Lake Road North of County Road 14 as shown on the concept plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. (the "Project "). C. Owner understands that the City will determine the general nature of the improvement, the estimated cost, the benefited properties and the area proposed to be assessed pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 before ordering any improvement. D. Owner reserves the right to review and approve the plans and specifications for the Project. E. If the City orders the Project, Owner and City agree to enter into a public improvement agreement consistent with this Petition prior to the City's award of a construction contract for the Project. CM PROPERTIES 14, LLC (OWNER) By: Its: aer 77 Chief Manager 1348177.2 Date: Z // STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) \SS. This instrument was acknowledged before 20 // , by ' r~ ^L/7 / LAURI Notary Public 'Mmnamota DAKOTA COUNTY My Commission Expires January 31, 2013 me this ^� �� /0 day of f/px7/�- ' 2. -"-'~ Notary Public • • • • • Exhibit A Legal Description Parcel A: The West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota; except the East 165 feet of the West 489 feet of the South 198 feet of the West of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and except the South 165 feet of the West 264 feet of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 14 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota and except Lots 3 and 3A, Anoka County Right -of- Way Plat No. 65. together with Parcel B: Lots 4B and 5A, Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat No. 65, Anoka County, Minnesota. 3. Exhibit B 10 POND MIN MINIM NUM MIN 0 MEI NEIN 0 kit Highway 14 (Main Street) 7hE iPRoIE�'I' ,09 = xl:31dOS m v z NW '83NV1 ONII Ogg S3>IV1 ONII A'. November 201 2009 Legend I -35E / CSAH 14 Intersection Alignment Street Options wetlands 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN L-J3 50 foot Wetland Buffer 66 foot Pipeline Easement • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6D James E. Studenski, City Engineer May 23, 2011 Resolution No. 11 -50, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Contract, Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement. Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Public Works was contacted by a business near the culvert failure on Old Otter Lake Road. The culvert failure consisted of a sinkhole developing in the traffic lanes above the failure in the pipe. After inspection of the culvert failure it was determined that the culvert is not functioning properly and requires replacement. A request for quotes was prepared and distributed to four local contractors. Quotes were received by 11:00 a.m. on May 17, 2011. The results of the quotes are presented below. Contractor Arnt Construction Co Penn Contracting, Inc . C.W. Houle, Inc. Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Amount of Bid $ 98,254.00 $ 109,670.00 $ 132,836.00 No Quote Submitted $ 98,651.00 A copy of the complete quote tabulation is attached. Staff recommends authorizing the contract for the Old Otter Lake Road Service Road Culvert Replacement, to Arnt Construction Company. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 11 -50 Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Contract, Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement. P67 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -50 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE OLD OTTER LAKE SERVICE ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT. WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for quotes for the repair of the Old Otter Lake Road Service Road Culvert, quotes were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following quotes were received complying with the request: Contractor Arnt Construction Co Penn Contracting, Inc. C.W. Houle, Inc. Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. Amount of Bid $ 98,254.00 $ 109,670.00 $ 132,836.00 No Quote Submitted NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Arnt Construction Company, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the repair of the Old Otter Lake Road Service Road Culvert Replacement. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of May 2011. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. P6E • • • 500.00 li] 000.00 I I�.I O �00 ' OOui 000 M ' --1 -1. I I i I 0 o o 00 t o oIe :o OIO10 ur'a 0DIN00 t0 Or -N OIO ' 00 6 0 ,950.00 60.00 ,200.00 ,670.00 K) N 0 N I N V. N 2 2, 69 69 69 61 69169 69 69 61 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0. 1.0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N N 0 00j N ! h V 0 4- .4 O N O 5,0 CO O (0 5 11,0 61 69 69 61 69 69 69 69 169 69 69 69 69 69 69 • o 0 0 0 C C 0 D0� 20 (0 84 60 15 84 1,1 2, 11 5,! __ 1 a. N 49 69 69 I$ 01in00 p 0 ON 00 O 000(0() N 00 m01 a 1,51 MI 599 69 69 69 69 61 69 69 69 69 69 00 O p O O Q N h oe N 1, 1, O1 3, 4, -41 16, 2, 3, 1 69 69 69 69 61 69 VI O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000. 500. 15. 3. 3. 100. 0()00( a to f0 N (00069 a 2 5 12, 12 18 M W 69 69 69 69 69 61 69 69 UNIT J LS CY SY LF 1 JJ(.).) LS CY_ 1 LF EA LI CY SF - -I LF LF LF CY TN 001 _ 00p 001 ____ a CIO N NCO COO 48 150 150 135 70 2 _TRAFFIC CONTROL - } 3 1TOPSOIL BORROW WITH SEED — --- - - - - -- — - 4 'EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3 WITH SEED 5 jSILTFENCE -- - -- - -- - -- -- -- -- - -- - - - -- - --- -- - -- - -- - - - -- 2 rDEWATERING / DIVERSION (SEE DETAIL B) 3 -(TRENCH STABLIZATION - 1 -1/2 " CRUSHED OR WASHED ROCK (SEE DETAIL A) j, Street 1 iREMOVE BITUMINOUS 2 4SAW CUT BITUMINOUS 3 I REMOVE GUARD RAIL -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- 4 , INSTALL GUARDRAIL 5 (GRANULAR BORROW 8 ;BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT _ --9-1-BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 (LVWE 45030) 61 61 61 61 61 61 69 61 61 61 61 61 61 69 61 61 61 61 69 61 69 61 61 61 0 O 0 0 O 0 90 . O8 O O O 0 O) lO N 61 4.949 69 61 61 S mm 000000m 0000 SS . . . . . S f' 0 ) O 'NV 10 0 00) 0 N CD GO N 0, 00 N 1• < N) 61 069 994969996,919.969 61 61 61 61 6169 J COCA)- W W>. ),-11. >ZZ�J...1() J JU 0-, 01---(.5Z Z r S N'SONS mV ^nm�N g 1 r I •- N l") a N �IN Ic7 (0 1`10 O) 1 1 1 I LINO LAIStb, MINNEbt) 1 A 12=1== TKDA PROJECT NO. 14817.000 T. right hene The nefit people The right or,nyeartT BIDS OPENED: MAY 17, 2011, AT 10:00 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION CW HOULE, INC ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ALTERNATE BID 1 494949 6 41,, 61 0 6 I I I I I 61 6,00043 iI I 61 61 6 61 61 4 49 1 14A9,641- 0 I ' i i I - -- + +7 t i . , . -r _ _ - . 14-1- 4 . ! - $ 4,800.00 1 575.001 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 350.00 $ 2,760.00 $ 11,500.00 $ 7,980.00 $ 48,832.00_1 $ 26,800.00 $ 4,900.00 600.00 Loo.pee 00 006 $ $ 1,200.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 6,600.00 11-$ 135.00 $ 3,040.00 $ 132,836.00 $ 575.00 18.00 __ 22.001 $ 23.00 I $ 152.00_1 SY —1 LF 1 EA 1 . CY 1 SF fl LF 1 LF I 400 1 100 1 150 isC General MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL TOPSOIL BORROW WITH SEED Surface Water Management Street REMOVE BITUMINOUS SAW CUT BITUMINOUS BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2380 (LVNW 35038) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 (LVWE 45030) P7( • • • AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 23, 2011 TOPIC: Resolution No. 11 -51, Establishing Lilac Street as a Municipal State Aid Street. Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Each State Aid eligible municipality must submit an annual inventory of the City's existing and proposed State Aid routes. This annual inventory is the basis that MnDOT uses to determine allocation of State Aid funds. The turnback of County Road 153 (Lilac Street) by Anoka County allows the City to add this road to our municipal state aid system. To complete this process the City must establish Lilac Street as a municipal state aid street in a resolution by the City Council. The attached map shows the 1.32 miles of Lilac Street that will become a municipal state aid street which allows the City to collect state aid funds for the maintenance and reconstruction of Lilac Street. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 11 -51 Establishing Lilac Street as a Municipal State Aid Street. P71 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -51 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LILAC STREET AS A MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council requests that the hereinafter described should be designated Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Lilac Street from County State Aid Highway 12 (Apollo Drive) to 4th Avenue and Lilac Street from 4th Avenue to County Road 53 (Sunset Drive), be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State Aid Street of Lino Lakes subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of Lino Lakes of to be and known as LILAC STREET. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of May, 2011. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. P7: • • • SUNSET AVE 'E MHF innommilmm le!a ge41 1.6t„,,, Mil 11'" IIIII fill tilliallil ri la� f Pill * 111111.46 lqin• Iu::111111 , AVM UM riiiii 4r4i ri a ri'l wadi *Ana OvIlla "11 VIII 1 orm tat Mai x Lbs 1111 • - r -u ♦/��� Imo Zig Num atil r7). Stiel 41* ".4111 *Ix war% III § g S.I.33211S GIV 31VLS 6 6 0 4D G