HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/13/2002 Council PacketAGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday
May 13, 2002
6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda —
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) May 13, 2002 (Check No. 64907 through 65858 in the amount of
$240,295.62).
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 13196 through 13215 in the amount
of $15,325.28).
iii) Consider Resolution No. 02 -43, Amending Resolution No. 02 -35,
Establishing Precincts, Polling Places and Adding New Precincts and
Polling Places
2. Open Mike
A) Anoka County Commissioner Margaret Langfeld, to present Recycling Award
3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A. Public Hearing on Five -Year Financial Plan, 2002 — 2006, Al Rolek
B. Consider Resolution No. 02 -40 Adopting Five -Year Financial Plan, 2002 — 2006, Al
Rolek
C. Consider Resolution No. 02 -41 Authorizing Issuance of $2.73 million G.O.
Improvement Bonds, Al Rolek
4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A. Consider Hiring Patrick Moonen as a Full -Time Building Inspector
B. Consider Approving a Two -Year Labor Contract with Police Sergeants (L.E.L.S)
5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
Page 1
•
•
•
AGENDA
None.
6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A. Review and Approve 2002 Park Board Goals, Rick DeGardner
7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A. Consider Resolution No. 02 -42 to hire Schoell & Madson, Inc. to complete TIF
Redevelopment Site and Building Analysis, Mary Alice Divine
8. Unfinished Business
9. New Business
Consider Approval of Council Minutes:
A) April 3, 2002 -- Council Work Session Minutes
B) April 8, 2002 — City Council Meeting Minutes
C) April 11, 2002 — Joint Meeting with the Charter Commission
D) April 17, 2002 — Council Work Session Minutes
E) April 22, 2002 — Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes (to follow on Friday)
F) April 22, 2002 — City Council Meeting Minutes
G) May 1, 2002 -- Canvassing Board Minutes (to follow on Friday)
10. Community Calendar, May 14, 2002 through May 27, 2002:
A) Council Work Session, Wednesday, May 22, 5:30 p.m.
B) Memorial Day — City Hall Closed, Monday, May 27, 2002
C) City Council Meeting, Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
11. Adjourn
Revised ajb 05/06/02 4:10 p.m.
Page 2
•
EXPENDITURES
MAY 13, 2002
•
•
• Date: 04/25/2002 Time: 12:11:01 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
• Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (r) 2433 - 2433
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: s Invoice Status: A
# of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 485.68 485.68 .00 .00
000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 195.79 195.79 .00 .00
000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 189.15 189.15 .00 .00
000206 ANDRZEJWSKI, PAULA 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
000207 BAKER, FLOYD 1 122.50 122.50 .00 .00
000208 BROWN, MR. 1 479.25 479.25 .00 .00
000214 DOWNS, THEARIE, II 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00
000215 HULSE, BOB 1 725.00 725.00 .00 .00
000217 JUNGBAUER, LOU 1 346.12 346.12 .00 .00
000329 ROLEK, ALAN 1 528.00 528.00 .00 .00
000370 ANOKA COUNTY 2 1,341.00 1,341.00 .00 .00
0• QWEST 1 99.23 99.23 .00 .00
000620 BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVISION OF 1 1,398.80 1,398.80 .00 .00
000633 TALLY, STEVEN 1 825.00 825.00 .00 .00
000634 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, INC. 2 444.43 444.43 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00
000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 90.23 90.23 .00 .00
000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 99.00 99.00 .00 .00
000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 23.69 23.69 .00 .00
000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 14,151.70 14,151.70 .00 .00
000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 16.45 16.45 .00 .00
001062 CULLIGAN, BOTTLED WATER, INC. 1 4.26 4.26 .00 .00
• Date: 04/25/2002 Time: 12:11:03
CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 2
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 1,783.39 1,783.39 .00 .00
001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 34.51 34.51 .00 .00
001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 257.40 257.40 .00 .00
001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 43.07 43.07 .00 .00
001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 96.00 96.00 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 4,332.96 4,332.96 .00 .00
001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 292.13 292.13 .00 .00
001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 106.95 106.95 .00 .00
001780 HAMMES, WILLIAM 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
001967 INTOXIMETERS, INC. 1 644.33 644.33 .00 .00
002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 377.00 377.00 .00 .00
002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 276.00 276.00 .00 .00
003320 NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 5 3,363.95 3,363.95 .00 .00
003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 15,493.98 15,493.98 .00 .00
01110. PETTY CASH 1 80.34 80.34 .00 .00
003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 2 1,842.50 1,842.50 .00 .00
003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 386.50 386.50 .00 .00
003930 SCHLOER, PAULA 1 36.50 36.50 .00 .00
004350 T.K.D.A. 7 61,677.37 61,677.37 .00 .00
004400 TESCH, DAN 1 44.20 44.20 .00 .00
005028 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION 1 10,235.29 10,235.29 .00 .00
900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 4 499.68 499.68 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 63 124,274.33 124,274.33 .00 .00*
•
Date: 05/02/2002 Time: 09:05:00 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 2446 - 2446
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000034 GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF 1 68.00 68.00 .00 .00
000241 LUCIW, TERI 1 23.00 23.00 .00 .00
000242 MINNESOTA ZEPHER 1 800.00 800.00 .00 .00
000340 ANDERSON, MARILYN 1 1,250.00 1,250.00 .00 .00
000354 SWENSON, CHRISTINE 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00
000405 RYDEEN, LESTER 1 199.00 199.00 .00 .00
000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,037.36 1,037.36 .00 .00
000528 QWEST 1 54.47 54.47 .00 .00
000879 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH PLAN 1 24,015.53 24,015.53 .00 .00
001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,812.50 2,812.50 .00 .00
001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 701.89 701.89 .00 .00
01111, HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 69.00 69.00 .00 .00
003478 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 1 278.96 278.96 .00 .00
003490 PETTY CASH 1 135.20 135.20 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 14 31,472.91 31,472.91 .00 .00*
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:06:06
Ranges: Vendor #: (A)
• Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (r) 2441 - 2441
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000051 A T & T 1 8.06 8.06 .00 .00
000190 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 1 25.68 25.68 .00 .00
000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 367.43 367.43 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 34.86 34.86 .00 .00
000222 ADVANCE SPECIALTIES COMPANY 1 190.80 190.80 .00 .00
000226 AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE LINE 2 170.35 170.35 .00 .00
000227 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 2,947.78 2,947.78 .00 .00
000229 DFS ACCEPTANCE 1 2,708.00 2,708.00 .00 .00
000230 HEADSETS.COM 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000231 MINNESOTA BOARD OF PEACE OFFICER 1 270.00 270.00 .00 .00
000237 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF 1 228.49 228.49 .00 .00
0• SWEENEY BROTHERS 1 95.48 95.48 .00 .00
000239 TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. 1 733.40 733.40 .00 .00
000240 UNITED SUPPLY CORPORATION 1 79.88 79.88 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 105.05 105.05 .00 .00
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 77.00 77.00 .00 .00
000370 ANOKA COUNTY 2 22.79 22.79 .00 .00
000390 ANOKA COUNTY 1 72.77 72.77 .00 .00
000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 7,168.21 7,168.21 .00 .00
000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 1 79.88 79.88 .00 .00
000557 BACON'S ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 684.50 684.50 .00 .00
000598 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 813.22 813.22 .00 .00
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:06:08 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
Ve # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000603 LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
000679 RIDIG HITCH, INC. 1 106.64 106.64 .00 .00
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 2,010.80 2,010.80 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 85.20 85.20 .00 .00
000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 337.78 337.78 .00 .00
000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 68.03 68.03 .00 .00
001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 23.10 23.10 .00 .00
001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. 1 261.99 261.99 .00 .00
001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 373.00 373.00 .00 .00
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 380.93 380.93 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 524.68 524.68 .00 .00
001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 50.65 50.65 .00 .00
001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 205.25 205.25 .00 .00
001270 DALCO, INC. 2 277.19 277.19 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 2,062.80 2,062.80 .00 .00
0• EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 195.28 195.28 .00 .00
001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 144.00 144.00 .00 .00
001520 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. 1 702.92 702.92 .00 .00
001570 FRIDLEY, CITY OF 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00
001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 75.06 75.06 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 406.54 406.54 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 246.09 246.09 .00 .00
001962 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF 1 85.00 85.00 .00 .00
002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 1,285.55 1,285.55 .00 .00
002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 11.84 11.84 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 5 800.03 800.03 .00 .00
•
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:06:09 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Discount
V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
002650 MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 405.00 405.00 .00 .00
002822 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC 1 118.00 118.00 .00 .00
003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 271.35 271.35 .00 .00
003868 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. 1 980.49 980.49 .00 .00
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 2 653.71 653.71 .00 .00
004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,833.84 1,833.84 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 859.26 859.26 .00 .00
004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 2 5,796.80 5,796.80 .00 .00
004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 11,528.62 11,528.62 .00 .00
004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 154.82 154.82 .00 .00
004920 ZIEGLER, INC. 1 2,209.88 2,209.88 .00 .00
900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 1 3,950.00 3,950.00 .00 .00
900513 WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE OF LAW 1 447.00 447.00 .00 .00
900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 133.13 133.13 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 76 57,140.88 57,140.88 .00 .00*
•
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:07:11 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor 8: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 2452 - 2452
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000051 A T & T 1 14.62 14.62 .00 .00
000160 ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. 1 9,108.00 9,108.00 .00 .00
000203 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS, LLC 1 199.11 199.11 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 2 29.74 29.74 .00 .00
000231 MINNESOTA BOARD OF PEACE OFFICER 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00
000243 G N EXCAVATING, INC. 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00
000244 HAGERTY, DAWN 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00
000246 STANLEY, RON 1 175.49 175.49 .00 .00
000528 QWEST 1 1,267.77 1,267.77 .00 .00
000617 MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC. 1 150.53 150.53 .00 .00
000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 581.55 581.55 .00 .00
0411 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,478.89 2,478.89 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 2,589.70 2,589.70 .00 .00
001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 627.50 627.50 .00 .00
001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 92.22 92.22 .00 .00
002146 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN 1 173.81 173.81 .00 .00
002230 DIVINE, MARY 1 60.22 60.22 .00 .00
002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 593.71 593.71 .00 .00
002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 2 2,225.32 2,225.32 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 319.00 319.00 .00 .00
002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 39.78 39.78 .00 .00
002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:07:13 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 632.93 632.93 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,812.02 2,812.02 .00 .00
003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 206.62 206.62 .00 .00
003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 373.12 373.12 .00 .00
004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 227.12 227.12 .00 .00
004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 332.07 332.07 .00 .00
004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 2 755.63 755.63 .00 .00
004560 U S BANK 1 254.90 254.90 .00 .00
004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 417.63 417.63 .00 .00
900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 380.00 380.00 .00 .00
900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 20.50 20.50 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 38 27,407.50 27,407.50 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:34 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund:
Dept Id:
Program:
Vendor #:
Invoice #:
Schedule Journal #:
Bank #:
Cash #:
Payroll Check Dates:
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(R) 2435 - 2454
(A)
(A)
(A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
64909
64910
0
64914
64907
0
64955
0
0
0
64934
64935
64959
64937
8
9
4941
0
64942
64963
64966
64968
64949
64952
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Description Dept
Amount
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A
ANDRZEJWSKI, PAULA
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
M BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTI
DELL MARKETING L.P.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
DFS ACCEPTANCE
G N EXCAVATING, INC.
HAGERTY, DAWN
INTL UNION OF OPER ENG
INTOXIMETERS, INC.
LUCIW, TERI
MAC MAY HOMES
MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE
MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE
NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT
PERA /COUNCIL
PERA /REGULAR
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
SWENSON, CHRISTINE
T.K.D.A.
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
TOWING SERVICE
TOWING SERVICE
CONTRACTOR /21ST AVE LIFT * * * * * * **
COMPUTER PURCHASE /VILLEL * * * * * * **
DENTAL INSURANCE * * * * * * **
COMPUTER PURCHASE /KAULFU * * * * * * **
REIMBURSE SEPTIC PERMIT/ * * * * * * **
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
SCREENER /CASE /MANUAL /MOU * * * * * * **
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
REIM BLDG ESCROW /636 LOI * * * * * * **
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * **
LICENSE TABS /SEIZED WEHI * * * * * * **
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE /MAR * * * * * * **
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /FEB * * * * * * **
MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR * * * * * * **
Total for Dept **
64924 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, I PART /REC SUPPLIES ADULT SP
64925 DOWNS, THEARIE, II REIMBURSE TOURNAMENT FEE ADULT SP
0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SOFTBALLS ADULT SP
Total for Dept 202
•
0 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. BIKE BOTTLES
0 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS PROGRAM REC
0 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. PROGRAM REC SUPPLIES
0 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN PARK /REC SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 205
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
189.15
20.00
85.20
70.00
10,235.29
2,947.78
1,630.70
2,708.00
75.00
33.00
377.00
644.33
23.00
500.00
276.00
45.00
511.50
206.62
15,493.98
6,175.07
766.76
28.00
4,157.23
880.00
48,078.61*
329.43
125.00
1,991.12
2,445.55*
337.78
373.00
978.51
671.58
2,360.87*
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:34 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 2
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept Amount
O BURGER, LUANN MAY DANCE CLASSES
64924 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, I PART /REC SUPPLIES
O S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. PROGRAM REC SUPPLIES
O TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN PARK /REC SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 207
64924 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, I PART /REC SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 208
64960 MINNESOTA ZEPHER
64908
64954
64921
64922
64955
64956
64962
64963
64966
64951
0
0
III,8 A T & T WIRELESS
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 406
A T & T WIRELESS
ANDERSON, MARILYN
CULLIGAN, BOTTLED
D.C.A. INC.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN
WATE
OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PETTY CASH
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
TESCH, DAN
TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC
U S BANK
YOUTH IN 380.00
YOUTH IN 76.67
YOUTH IN 1.98
YOUTH IN 47.58
506.23*
YOUTH SP 38.33
38.33*
RESERVATION /EMPLOYEE APP MAYOR /CO 800.00
Total for Dept 401
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
CONTRACT
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
POSTAGE /PARKING /SUPPLIES
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE MILEAGE /MEETIN
APRIL 22
COURSE /DAN T, PARTS, A T
Total for Dept 402
O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC APRIL 8, 10, 11
Total for Dept 405
800.00*
ADMINIST 27.31
ADMINIST 1,250.00
ADMINIST 4.26
ADMINIST 257.40
ADMINIST 98.00
ADMINIST 65.08
ADMINIST 77.29
ADMINIST 974.31
ADMINIST 20.00
ADMINIST 44.20
ADMINIST 507.26
ADMINIST 225.00
3,550.11*
CHARTER 128.50
128.50*
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR SENIORS 82.72
64955
64956
64963
64966
64945
64947
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
ROLEK, ALAN
SCHLOER, PAULA
64952 WILLIAM
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
REGISTRATION - GFOA /AIRFAR
REIMBURSE MILEAGE
Total for Dept 407
SENIORS 4.17
SENIORS 4.00
90.89*
FINANCE 85.75
FINANCE 41.48
FINANCE 500.01
FINANCE 14.00
FINANCE 528.00
FINANCE 36.50
1,205.74*
G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR LEGAL CO 12,996.70
Total for Dept 414 12,996.70*
64908 A T & T WIRELESS
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 DIVINE, MARY
O E. G. RUD & SONS, INC.
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
•
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
DENTAL INSURANCE
SUPPLIES
COMPILE SURVEYS /PLATS
LONG TERM DISABILITY
ECONOMIC 27.31
ECONOMIC 24.50
ECONOMIC 60.22
ECONOMIC 627.50
ECONOMIC 11.49
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:34 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 3
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept Amount
0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LEGAL SERVICES ECONOMIC
64962 PETTY CASH POSTAGE /PARKING /SUPPLIES ECONOMIC
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC
Total for Dept 415
64955
64956
64933
64941
64963
64966
64948
0
0
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
HYDEN, MICHAEL
NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK
SMYSER, JEFF
TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC
64949 T.K.D.A.
64955
64956
64963
64966
0
64908
1111k0
1
0
0
0
0
64955
64956
64957
64930
0
0
0
0
0
64961
64963
64966
0
0
•
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
REIMBURSE WORKSHOP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /MAR
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
GIS PROJECTS /MAR
PROGRAM
APRIL 8, 10, 11
Total for Dept 416
150.77
14.51
237.15
4.00
1,157.45*
PLANNING 49.00
PLANNING 21.85
PLANNING 99.00
PLANNING 2,852.45
PLANNING 474.30
PLANNING 8.00
PLANNING 1,670.00
PLANNING 30.00
PLANNING 223.50
5,428.10*
ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEER 14,823.81
Total for Dept 417
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
A T &
A T &
ANOKA
ANOKA
T
T WIRELESS
COUNTY
COUNTY
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 418
BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CONNEXUS ENERGY
CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF
HAMMES, WILLIAM
LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUT
METRO SALES INCORPORAT
MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPM
MINNESOTA BOARD OF PEA
MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTOR
MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN -MAR
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
SERVICE AGREEMENT /MAY
CELLULAR DIGITAL PACKET
REGISTRATION /MATT V
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MUNICI -PALS
REIMBURSE POST LICENSE
MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P
COPIER MAINTENANCE
9 RADAR CERTS
POST LICENSE /KYLE L
PUBLICATIONS
PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF REIMBURSE UNIFORM ALLOWA
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES
WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLE TUITION /3
Total for Dept 420
14,823.81*
Communit 49.00
Communit 24.37
Communit 500.01
Communit 8.00
581.38*
POLICE 8.06
POLICE 49.00
POLICE 22.79
POLICE 1,341.00
POLICE 40.00
POLICE 68.03
POLICE 10.65
POLICE 205.25
POLICE 338.26
POLICE 260.46
POLICE 68.00
POLICE 45.00
POLICE 35.00
POLICE 319.00
POLICE 405.00
POLICE 360.00
POLICE 118.00
POLICE 278.96
POLICE 8,173.79
POLICE 104.00
POLICE 653.71
POLICE 447.00
13,350.96*
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:35 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 4
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 421
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
0 INTERNATIONAL CONFEREN MEMBERSHIP /PETE K
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
0 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
Total for Dept 422
64908
0
0
0
64955
0
64956
0
0
0
0
64943
64963
•
64966
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64915
0
0
0
64955
64956
0
64927
0
0
0
64940
64943
A T & T WIRELESS
ALLIED BLACKTOP,
ANOKA COUNTY
CONNEXUS ENERGY
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
FRIDLEY, CITY OF
INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN PARTS
MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
INC.
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR STREETS
SWEEPER /TANDEM RENTAL STREETS
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE /JAN -M STREETS
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL STREETS
DENTAL INSURANCE STREETS
STREET SIGNS STREETS
LONG TERM DISABILITY STREETS
MEMBERSHIP STREETS
BATTERIES STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
PETTY CASH
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS FINE ASPHALT
VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
Total for Dept 430
POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
AMERICAN FASTENER & SU PARTS /SUPPLIES
AUTO- MEDICS, INC. TOWING SERVICE
AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE LINE PTO JOINT
BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER INSTALL EXHAUST
BOYER TRUCKS, INC. LUBEFILTER
CATCO PARTS, INC. PARTS
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME PARTS
DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. GASOHOL
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I CHEMICALS
GOA COMPANY, INC. GREASE /OIL /DRUM
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT,
LEEF BROTHER, INC.
NEW HOLLAND PLAN
PETTY CASH
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLANGE /FILTER /ROPE /WHEEL FLEET
REPAIR /REFINISH #801 FLEET
SHOP TOWELS FLEET
AIR FILTER FLEET
POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING FLEET
47.28
20.89
965.02
8.00
1,041.19*
73.50
30.89
313.49
1,237.17
10.60
1,833.84
3,499.49*
27.31
9,108.00
72.77
592.22
98.00
195.28
56.18
10.00
25.68
183.71
8.74
19.01
711.45
23.40
227.12
417.63
2,812.02
14,588.52*
23.20
79.88
170.35
100.00
90.23
23.10
50.65
4,652.50
24.50
11.39
75.06
292.13
246.09
593.71
11.84
16.45
10.00
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:35 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 5
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE FLEET
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FLEET
0 RIDIG HITCH, INC. FRAME RECEIVER FLEET
64967 RYDEEN, LESTER REIMBURSE SEMINAR FLEET
O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI PARTS CLEANER FLEET
0 SWEENEY BROTHERS JOURNAL KIT /SEAL /WIPER /0 FLEET
O U S BANK COURSE /DAN T, PARTS, A T FLEET
O UNITED SUPPLY CORPORAT PARTS FLEET
0 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TI 4 ALL SEASON TIRES FLEET
0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. PARTS FLEET
Total for Dept 431
O A T & T
O ANOKA COUNTY
64918 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
0 CONNEXUS ENERGY
O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC
64919 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC
O CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRU
0
64956
0
0
0
0
0
0
64943
•2
3
0
64944
64966
0
0
64908
0
0
64913
64918
64923
64955
0
64926
64956
64958
0
0
•
DALCO, INC.
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN
HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC.
HEADSETS.COM
LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT,
MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC.
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
PROPERTY TAX
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARTIAL PAYMENT /C H WOOD
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
WINDSHIELD /WINDSTAR
HEADSET /ADAPTER
REPAIR /REFINISH
TONER
OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING
PETTY CASH POSTAGE /PARKING /SUPPLIES
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH BATTERIES
U S BANK COURSE /DAN T, PARTS, A T
Total for Dept 432
A T & T WIRELESS
AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
ANOKA COUNTY
BEACON BALLFIELDS DIVI
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
DEGARDNER, RICK
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
ECM PUBLISHERS, INC
ECM PUBLISHERS, INC
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
HOFFMAN, MICHAEL
KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
THREAD GAUGE
PROPERTY TAX
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
REIMBURSE MILEAGE
DENTAL INSURANCE
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
LONG TERM DISABILITY
REIMBURSE HAY BALES
LEGAL SERVICES
PARTS
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
500.01
4.60
106.64
199.00
264.12
95.48
18.95
79.88
199.11
103.66
8,042.53*
14.62
1,587.15
1,435.08
980.48
20.50
499.68
3,950.00
277.19
8.75
92.22
261.99
50.00
1,285.55
150.53
271.35
28.28
8.40
500.01
1,214.53
63.17
4.00
332.07
10.95
13,046.50*
84.17
41.40
161.87
1,398.80
348.31
43.07
134.75
144.00
96.00
56.39
69.00
255.77
183.72
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:35 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 6
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
0
0
0
0
64943
64962
64963
0
64964
64966
64948
0
0
64908
0
64917
0
64955
64956
0
64943
64963
64966
0
Description
MENARDS, INC.
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY,
MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
NATURE CALLS, INC.
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
TRAIL SIGN POSTS
SOFTBALLS /SOCCER NETS
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
PORTABLE RESTROOMS
POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING
POSTAGE /PARKING /SUPPLIES
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS PROJECTS
TURF SUPPLIES, INC. PARK SUPPLIES
WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 450
A T & T WIRELESS
Dept
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
Amount
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR RECREATI
BERNSTEIN, BARRY SCHOOL REIMBURSEMENT
BURSACK, ELIZABETH REIMBURSE MILEAGE
CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
PETTY CASH POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING RECREATI
PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN PARK /REC SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 451
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
fb8 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR ENVIRONM
5 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY ENVIRONM
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE ENVIRONM
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM
Total for Dept 461
0 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF REIMBURSE EARTH DAY SUPP SOLID WA
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
64969 M KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN RECYCLING DAY
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL
64946 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL
Total for Dept 462
64912 BAKER, FLOYD REIMBURSE OAK WILT
64916 BROWN, MR. REIMBURSE OAK WILT
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
64932 HULSE, BOB REIMBURSE OAK WILT
•
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
768.15
234.20
4.54
632.93
4.13
35.00
1,487.18
53.24
54.47
22.00
172.50
5,147.15
105.05
11,737.79*
51.35
581.55
23.69
133.13
53.90
32.68
8.74
15.25
337.15
12.80
36.47
1,286.71*
27.31
11.02
5.90
225.01
1.80
271.04*
524.68
2.45
1.31
173.81
50.00
.40
109.00
386.50
1,248.15*
122.50
479.25
11.03
5.89
725.00
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13 :14:35 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 7
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
64936 JUNGBAUER, LOU REIMBURSE OAK WILT
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P HEALTH INSURANCE
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
0 STANLEY, RON TREE REMOVAL
64950 TALLY, STEVEN REIMBURSE OAK WILT
Total for Dept 463
64908 A T & T WIRELESS
0 ANOKA COUNTY
0 BLAINE, CITY OF
64953 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
O CONNEXUS ENERGY
64920 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
64928 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL,
64929 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA
64931 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN
0 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH,
O MENARDS, INC.
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
0 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP
64943 PETTY CASH
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
64944 QWEST
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO,
0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.
.0 ZIEGLER, INC.
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
PROPERTY TAX
QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN
UTILITY POSTAGE
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
DIVIDER TRAY
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH
FILTER /COUPLER
REGULATOR /PLUG /SWITCHOVE
WATER SAMPLES
MASONRY
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
VALVE BOX LID
POSTAGE /TOOL BOX /PARKING
HEALTH INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAR -APR
LIFE INSURANCE
MIU -PHONE PARTS
PARTS
MAINTENANCE /DIAGNOSTIC T
Total for Dept 494
O BACON'S ELECTRIC COMPA
0 BLAINE, CITY OF
64953 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
O CONNEXUS ENERGY
64920 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME
64955 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
64956 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
64928 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL,
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
64963 PREFERRED ONE HEALTH P
64966 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
TROUBLE SHOOT LIFT STATI
QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN
UTILITY POSTAGE
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
DIVIDER TRAY
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
HEALTH INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
FORESTRY 346.12
FORESTRY 225.00
FORESTRY 1.80
FORESTRY 175.49
FORESTRY 825.00
2,917.08*
WATER 109.20
WATER 1,003.87
WATER 669.80
WATER 190.46
WATER 704.93
WATER 17.25
WATER 40.42
WATER 21.36
WATER 53.47
WATER 195.79
WATER 4,332.96
WATER 77.00
WATER 31.88
WATER 13.22
WATER 813.22
WATER 3.67
WATER 371.44
WATER 36.06
WATER 9.60
WATER 11,528.62
WATER 51.16
WATER 2,209.88
22,485.26*
SEWER 684.50
SEWER 1,341.00
SEWER 190.47
SEWER 190.61
SEWER 17.26
SEWER 40.44
SEWER 21.36
SEWER 53.48
SEWER 4.54
SEWER 371.45
SEWER 9.60
733.40
3,658.11*
O TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, MODIFIED CEDAR STREET LI SEWER
Total for Dept 495
0 ADVANCE SPECIALTIES CO SUPPLIES FOR CLEARWATER OTHER
0 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX OTHER
0 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. BENCH OTHER
64949 T.K.D.A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /FE OTHER
O TURF SUPPLIES, INC. ANNUAL RYE OTHER
•
190.80
4,415.32
702.92
42,696.33
649.65
Date: 05/07/2002 Time: 13:14:36 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 8
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Sills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
64952 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR OTHER
Total for Dept 499
•
•
275.00
48,930.02*
Grand Total 240,295.62*
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
5/8/02
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
4/30/02 13196
4/30/02 13197
4/30/02 13198
4/30/02 13199
4/30/02 13200
4/30/02 13201
4/30/02 13202
4/30/02 13203
4/30/02 13204
4/30/02 13205
4/30/02 13206
4/30/02 13207
4/30/02 13208
4/30/02 13209
4/30/02 13210
4/30/02 13211
4/30/02 13212
• 4/30/02 13213
4/30/02 13214
4/30/02 13215
•
Alex Air Apparatus, Inc.
Allina Health System
Anoka - Technical College
Aspen Mills
Batteries Plus
Centennial Utilities
Center Frame and Wheel Alignment, Inc.
David Bruder
General Safety Equipment
Heiman Fire Equipment, Inc.
Metrocall
National Registry of EMT
Pioneer Products
Reliant Energy Minnegasco
Rolltex Computers
Tierney Brothers, Inc.
Stacy's Specialty Stitching
Image Printing & Graphics
Anoka - Technical College
Postmaster
1 of 1
ACCOUNT
AMOUNT
42130 - Equipment Expense 131.47
42220 - Travel, Conference, School 2,380.00
42220 - Travel, Conference, School 120.00
42120 - Uniform Expense 306.50
42130 - Equipment Expense 14.99
42251 - Station 1 - Gas 408.31
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 85.00
42280 - Miscellaneouse Expense 932.00
42130 - Equipment Expense 34.56
42130 - Equipment Expense 1,207.85
42240 - Telephone Expense 69.47
42220 - Travel, Conference, School 40.00
42130 - Equipment Expense 3,259.70
42253 - Station 2 - Gas 525.58
42130 - Equipment Expense 4,917.11
42130 - Equipment Expense 259.62
42280 - Miscellaneouse Expense 158.50
45010 - Safety Camp Expense 53.62
42220 - Travel, Conference, School 400.00
42180 - Office Supplies 21.00
Total $15,325.28
•
AGENDA ITEM lAiii
STAFF ORIGNINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2002
TOPIC: Resolution 02 -43 Amending Resolution 02 -35,
Establishing Precincts, Polling Places and Adding
New Precincts and Polling Places
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
BACKGROUND:
This resolution clarifies adjustments to the precinct boundary descriptions.
At the April 22, 2002 city council meeting the council approved Resolution 02 -35, establishing
precincts, polling places and adding two new precincts and polling places. As required by
Minnesota State Statute 204B.14, the city sent Resolution 02 -35 and a map illustrating the new
precinct boundaries to the Secretary of State's Office.
Mr. Randle Cutting, the GIS Administrator in the Elections Division in the Secretary of State's
Office, notified the city of a minor geographical adjustment. Mr. Cutting requested that the city
amend the language to reflect the change to the precinct boundary at Lake Drive and Apollo
• Drive to be consistent with the legislative boundary split.
The corrected portion of the boundary line descriptions separating Precinct 2 and Precinct 3 will
read:
•
Precinct #2, "south on Lake Drive to the eastern extension of Lilac Street, west on the
extension of Lilac Street to Apollo Drive...." rather than "south on Lake Drive to Apollo
Drive, southwest on Apollo Drive...."
"Precinct #3 "Apollo Drive to Lilac Street, east on Lilac Street extending to the center of
Lake Drive ", rather than Apollo Drive to Lake Drive (see attached Resolution 02-43 for a
complete description of precinct boundaries).
Regarding Precinct #6, the corrected portion of the description will be "north on 20th Avenue to
Cedar Street, follow Centerville border east and north to Main Street...... ", rather than "north on
20th Avenue to Main Street" (see attached Resolution 02-43 for complete description).
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution 02 -43
2. Deny Resolution 02-43
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Resolution 02-43
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 02-43
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 02 -35, ESTABLISHING
PRECINCTS, POLLING PLACES AND ADDING NEW PRECINCTS AND
POLLING PLACES
WHEREAS, the legislature of the State of Minnesota has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, the voting precincts in the City of Lino Lakes must be reestablished after
the legislature has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, residential growth in the city has created a need for additional precincts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes, Anoka County, State of Minnesota that:
1. The city be divided into six voting precincts effective with the September 10,
• 2002 State Primary Election, and
•
2. That the boundaries of the precincts are hereby established pursuant to Minnesota
Statute 204B.14, subd. 3c, and
3. That the polling places of the precincts are hereby established pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 2048.16, and
4. That such boundaries and polling places shall be as follows:
Precinct #1 — Polling Place - Lino Lakes Senior Center, 1189 Main Street:
South on 4th Avenue from Pine Street on the north to Main Street on the south, east on
Main Street to Lake Drive, south on Lake Drive to I -35W, northeast on I -35W to Main
Street, south on Main Street to Centerville border, follow Centerville border east and
south to Main Street, east on Main Street to 24th Avenue, our eastern border, north on 24th
Avenue to northern border, west on northern border to 4th Avenue.
Precinct #2 - Centennial Fire Station #2, 7741 Lake Drive:
South on 4th Avenue from Pine Street on the north to Main Street on the south, east on
Main Street to Lake Drive, south on Lake Drive to the eastern extension of Lilac Street,
west on the eastern extension of Lilac Street to Apollo Drive, south and west on Apollo
Drive to Sunset Road, north on Sunset Road to northern border, east on northern border
to 4th Avenue.
• Precinct #3 - Saint Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street:
•
•
East and north on Apollo Drive from Sunset Road to Lilac Street, east on Lilac Street
extending to the center of Lake Drive, southwest on Lake Drive to Hodgson Road,
southeast on Hodgson Road to Rice Creek, west along northern shore of Baldwin Lake to
western border, north on western border to Apollo Drive.
Precinct #4 - Rice Lake Elementary School, 575 Birch Street:
North on Lake Drive from Hodgson Road to I -35W, northeast on I -35W to Main Street,
south on Main Street to Centerville border, follow Centerville border west and south,
continue east on Centerville's southern border to 20th Avenue, south on 20th Avenue to
Birch Street, west on Birch Street to Hodgson Road, northwest on Hodgson Road to Lake
Drive.
Precinct #5 - Rice Creek Covenant Church, 125 Ash Street:
North on Ware Road from Ash Street on the south to Coyote Trail, east and north on
Coyote Trail to Linden Lane, east and north on Linden Lane to Lonesome Pine Trail, east
and north on Lonesome Pine Trail to Hawthorn Road, east on Hawthorn Road to Painted
Turtle Road, northeast on Painted Turtle Road to West Shadow Lake Drive, north on
West Shadow Lake Drive to Birch Street, west on Birch Street to Hodgson Road,
northwest on Hodgson Road to Rice Creek, west along northern shore of Baldwin Lake
to western boundary, south on western boundary to Ash Street, east on Ash Street to
Ware Road.
Precinct #6 - Living Water Lutheran Church, 865 Birch Street:
North on Ware Road from Ash Street on the south to Coyote Trail, east and north on
Coyote Trail to Linden Lane, east and north on Linden Lane to Lonesome Pine Trail, east
and north on Lonesome Pine Trail to Hawthorn Road, east on Hawthorn Road to Painted
Turtle Road, northeast on Painted Turtle Road to West Shadow Lake Drive, north on
West Shadow Lake Drive to Birch Street, east on Birch Street to 20th Avenue, north on
20th Avenue to Cedar Street, follow Centerville Border east and north to Main Street, east
on Main Street to 24th Avenue, our eastern border, south along our eastern border to our
southern border, west along our southem border to Ware Road.
Attached to this resolution is a map showing said precincts and the location of each
polling place.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of May, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE May 13, 2002
TOPIC Consideration of Resolution 02 -40 Adopting Five -Year Financial
Plan for 2002 — 2006
Simple Majority
VOTE REQUIRED
The Lino Lakes City Charter Section 7.05 requires the annual preparation of a five -year financial
plan. The elements to be included in the plan are a Public Service Program, Revenue Program,
Capital Improvement Program and a Capital Budget. The Charter requires that a public hearing
be held on the plan and that a summary of the approved plan be published.
Staff has prepared a draft Five -Year Financial Plan for the years 2002 — 2006. The plan includes
all of the required elements. The Plan first addresses the Public Service Program and lists
anticipated personnel and other resources needed to meet these needs over the five -year term.
Projections of the City's tax capacity and tax levy authority are presented next, followed by
projected revenues (Revenue Program) for the next five years. A detailed projection of
anticipated program expenditures follows. Finally, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is
presented which addresses future needs in the areas of infrastructure extension and
replacement, equipment replacement and park improvements. Project descriptions, cost
estimates, financial resources and cash flow analyses are included within the CIP, and
constitute projected budgets for future capital needs .
The assumptions used in the plan are based upon both historical data and projections of future
growth and needs. In general, an inflation rate of three percent (3 %) was used in projecting
future expenditures. This percentage varies somewhat based upon what is known about
particular factors, industries, etc. Existing statutes were used to calculate available taxing
capacity and taxing authority. More detailed assumptions and factors are listed throughout the
document.
The plan has been reviewed by the City Council at several work sessions, and a public hearing is
to be held on May 13, 2001.
The City Council needs to take final action Five -year Financial Plan for 2002 - 2006. Staff
recommendation is to approve Resolution 02 -40 adopting the Five -year Financial Plan for 2002 —
2006.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution 02 -40 adopting the Five -year Financial Plan for 2002 - 2006.
2. Refer to Staff for further review.
3. Deny Resolution 02 -40.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 02-40
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 5 -YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN FOR 2002 -2006
WHEREAS, Chapter VII, Section 7.05 of the City Charter calls for the
preparation of a five -year financial plan, and,
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared such five -year financial plan for the years
2002 —2006, including all elements as listed in the City Charter, and,
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed the proposed 2002 -2006 Five -Year
Financial Plan with the City Council, and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing and taken public
comment on the proposed 2002 -2006 Five -Year Financial Plan as required by the City
Charter.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes City Council
hereby the proposed 2002 - 2006 five -year financial plan. In accordance with the City
Charter, the City Council hereby orders a summary of the Five -Year Financial Plan be
published in the official newspaper.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of May, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
AGENDA ITEM 3B
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE May 13, 2002
TOPIC Consideration of Resolution 02 -41 Providing for the Issuance and
Sale of $2,730,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A
VOTE REQUIRED
BACKGROUND
Simple Majority
The City Council has approved public improvement projects for Lake Drive /Apollo Drive, Twilight
Acres Sanitary Sewer and West Shadow Ponds Street and Utilities. It is necessary to issue and
sell General Obligation Improvement bonds to finance the improvements to be made in these
projects. Our financial advisor, Springsted, Inc., has issued it's recommendation for the issuance
of $2,730,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds.
If approved the sale would occur on June 24, 2002, with consideration for award by the City
Council at it's meeting the same day. The issue would have a 10 year term running from 2004
through 2013 and would be repaid through the levy of special assessments against the benefitted
parcels.
Staff Recommendation is for the City Council to approve Resolution 02-41 Providing for the
Issuance and Sale of $2,730,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A.
OPTTION'S
1. Adopt Resolution 02 -41.
2. Refer to Staff for further review.
3. Deny Resolution 02 -41.
Option 1
Recommendations
For
CRy
o Uno Lake Mnn
$2,730,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A
Presented to:
Honorable John Bergeson, Mayor
Members, City Council
Ms. Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator
Mr. Alan Rolek, Finance Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182
Study No.: L050202
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
May 7, 2002
SPRINGSTED
Public Finance Advisors
RECOMMENDATIONS
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance
Bonds, Series 2002A
We respectfully request your consideration
issue. Bond proceeds will be used to finance
areas of the City.
We recommend the following for the Bonds:
of $2,730,000 General Obligation Improvement
of our recommendations for the above -named
street and utility improvement projects in various
1. Action Requested
2. Sale Date and Time
3. Authority and Purpose for the Bond Issue
4. Repayment Term
5. Security and Payment Cycle
(a) Security
(b) Source of Payment
(c) First Payment Cycle
To establish the date and time of receiving
bids and establish the terms and conditions of
the offering.
Monday, June 24, 2002 at 11:00 A.M., with
consideration for award by the City Council at
7:00 P.M. that same day.
The Bonds are being issued pursuant to the
City's Charter and Minnesota Statutes,
Chapters 475 and 429. Bond proceeds will be
used to finance street and utility improvement
projects in various areas of the City, as listed
on Page 7.
The Bonds will mature annually February 1,
2004 through 2013. Interest will be payable
semi - annually each February 1 and August 1,
commencing February 1, 2003.
The Bonds will be general obligations of the
City.
The Bonds will be repaid from special
assessments levied against benefited
properties. Each year's first -half collection of
assessments will be used to pay the interest
payment due August 1 in the year of
collection. Second -half collections of
assessments plus surplus first -half collections
will be used to pay the February 1 principal
and interest payment due in the following
year. The City will file assessments on all
properties on or about October 15, 2002 for
collection in 2003
Because the interest payment on February 1
2003 will come due prior to receipt of any
assessment collections, the proceeds of the
Bonds include an amount sufficient to make
that payment.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
May 7, 2002
6. Prepayment Provisions
7. Credit Rating Comments
8. Term Bonds
9. Federal Treasury Regulations Concerning
Tax - Exempt Obligations
(a) Bank Qualification
(b) Rebate Requirements
The City may elect on February 1, 2008, and
on any date thereafter, to prepay the Bonds
due on or after February 1, 2009, at a price of
par plus accrued interest.
An application will be made to Moody's
Investors Service for a rating on the Bonds.
The City's current general obligation credit
rating is "A3 ".
We have included a provision that permits the
underwriters to combine multiple maturity
years into a term bond, subject to mandatory
redemption on the same maturity schedule
provided in the Terms of Proposal. The
advantage to the underwriter is that it provides
large blocks of bonds, which are more
attractive to bond funds, and certain pension
funds, which deal only with large blocks of
bonds. This in turn is a benefit to the City
since selling larger blocks of bonds reduces
the risk to the underwriter, allowing them to
lower their costs and the interest coupons.
Since the Bonds are being offered on a
competitive bid basis and awarded on the
lowest true interest cost, the City will award
the Bonds to the best bid regardless of
whether term bonds are chosen or not.
Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions
cannot deduct from income for federal income
tax purposes, expense that is allocable to
carrying and acquiring tax - exempt bonds. There
is an exemption to this for "bank qualified" bonds,
which can be so designated if the issuer does
not issue more than $10 million of tax exempt
bonds in a calendar year. Issues that are bank
qualified generally receive slightly lower interest
rates than issues that are not bank qualified.
Since the City expects to issue Tess than $10
million of tax exempt debt in 2002, this issue is
designated as bank qualified.
All tax - exempt issues are subject to the federal
arbitrage and rebate requirements, which require
all excess earnings created by the financing to
be rebated to the U.S. Treasury. The
requirements generally cover two categories:
bond proceeds and debt service funds. There
are exemptions from rebate in both of these
categories.
Page 2
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
May 7, 2002
(c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund
(d) Economic Life
(e) Federal Reimbursement
Regulations
10. Continuing Disclosure
Since the City expects to issue Tess than
$5 million of tax exempt obligations in 2002, the
City qualifies as a "small issuer' and will be
exempt from rebating excess earnings on Bond
proceeds to the federal govemment.
The City must maintain a bona fide debt service
fund for the Bonds or be subject to yield
restriction. This requires restricting the
investments held in the debt service fund to the
yield on the Bonds and/or paying back excess
investment earnings in the debt service fund to
the federal government. A bona fide debt
service fund is a fund for which there is an equal
matching of revenue to debt service expense,
with carry over permitted equal to the greater of
the investment earnings in the fund during that
year or 1/12 the debt service of that year.
With improvement bonds, such as this issue,
additional diligence should be exercised in
monitoring the debt service fund due to the
potential accumulation of assessment
prepayments which could cause the fund to
become non -bona fide.
The average life of the Bonds cannot exceed
120% of the economic life of the projects to be
financed. The economic life of the improvements
exceeds 20 years. The average life of the Bonds
is 5.983 years; therefore the issue is within the
economic fife requirements.
Federal reimbursement regulations require the
City to make a declaration, within 60 days of the
actual payment, of its intent to reimburse itself
from expenses paid prior to the receipt of Bond
proceeds. It is our understanding the City has
taken whatever actions are necessary to comply
with the federal reimbursement regulations in
regards to the Bonds.
The Bonds are subject to continuing disclosure
requirements set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The SEC rules require
the City to undertake an annual update of certain
Official Statement information and report any
material events to the national repositories.
Springsted currently provides continuing
disclosure services for the City under a separate
contract. An amendment to that contract adding
this issue has been provided to City staff.
Page 3
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
May 7, 2002
11. Attachments
Sources and Uses of Funds
Composition of the Issue (project listing)
Assessment Income Schedules
Debt Service Schedule
Terms of Proposal
DISCUSSION
Proceeds of the Bonds, together with funds from other sources, will be used to finance
infrastructure improvement projects in various areas of the City, including street and utility
improvements. The sources and uses of funds for the Bonds are shown on Page 6.
The Bonds will be repaid from special assessments levied against benefited properties.
Assessments in the aggregate amount of $2,727,708 will be filed on or about October 15, 2002.
Assessments will be spread over a terms of 10 to 15 years, with even annual total payments of
principal and interest. Interest will be charged on the unpaid principal balance at a rate which is
2% over the rate on the Bonds, or approximately 6.25 %. The effective rate on the Bonds is
estimated to be approximately 4.25 %.
Two out of the three projects being financed bear special mention as to our treatment of debt
service versus assessment income. First, while the assessments on the Twilight Acres project
are actually spread for a term of 15 years, we recommend that the Bonds be amortized over a
10 year term. Assessment income received after the final payment on the Bonds may be used
by the City for proper corporate purposes. Secondly, with regard to West Shadow Ponds, which
is a new development, the assessments will actually be spread over a term of ten years. At the
direction of City staff we have shown the assessment income over a term of five years, and
structured the debt service payments accordingly, to take into account likely prepayments of
assessments resulting from property sales. If the assessment income and anticipated
prepayments are not ultimately received on the projected schedule (shown on Page 12), the
City will be required to fund resulting income shortfalls from other City funds or a property tax
levy.
The project listing, showing the assessed costs and other project funding sources, is shown on
Page 7. Our projection of assessment income is shown on Pages 8 through 12.
Our recommended principal structure for the Bonds is shown on Page 13. Debt service has
been structured around the projected annual assessment income to result in even annual
surplus income over a term of ten years. Page 13 shows the following information:
Columns 1 through 4 show the annual principal, estimated interest rates and projected
total principal and interest payments, given the current market environment.
Column 5 shows the capitalized interest used to make the February 1, 2003 interest
payment
• Column 6 shows the net debt service requirements after taking into account the
capitalized interest.
Column 7 shows the 5% overlevy which is required by State statutes and serves as a
protection to bondholders and the City in the event of delinquencies in the collection of
assessments or taxes.
Page 4
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
May 7, 2002
• Column 8 shows the total projected assessment income developed on Pages 8 through
12.
Column 9 shows the difference between columns 5 and 6 and represents the projected
annual surplus of assessment income over 105% of debt service.
Based on projected assessment income, it is expected that the City will not be required to levy
ad valorem property taxes to pay debt service on the Bonds.
Springsted is pleased to again be of service to the City of Lino Lakes.
Respectfully submitted,
C 4-10A6*-0
SPF{IN!GS thD Incorporated
Ilr
Provided to Staff:
Continuing Disclosure Contract Amendment
Page 5
$2,730,000
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation improvement Bonds
Series 2002A
TOTAL ISSUE SOURCES AND USES
Dated 07/01/2002
ivwed 07/01/2002
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Land Sate Proceeds.
Community Development Block Grant--
Anoka County Signal Agreement
West Shadow Ponds
Lake Drtve/Apolio Twilight Acres Sewer Street and Utlitty Total
52,090,000.00
161,609,00
40,730.00
TOTAL SOURCES.... ....... 52,292.33900
USES OF FUNDS
Deposit to Projed Construction Fund
Deposit to Capitalized interest (CIF) Fund.--.
Total Underwriters Discount
Rounding Amount
2,196,976.09
47,239.79
22,990.00
21,053.12
4,080.09
52.292,339 00
5240,000.00
125,000.00
5365,000,00
356,000.00
6,433.76
2.640.00
2,417.58
(491.33)
5385,00000
5400,000.00 52,730,000.00
161,609,00
125,000.00
40,730.00
5400,000.00 53,057,339.00
385,00000 2,936,976.00
7,967.71 60441.25
4,400.00 30,030.00
4,029.30 27,500,00
(1.297.01) 2,291.76
5400,000.00 53,057,339.00
Sprlegsted evaporated
Advisors to the Public Seder
s U3VOLAKES.SF-Sorles 2002A-lestue Sunettely
6/ 212002 232 P11
Page 6
$2,730,000
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A
PROJECT LISTING - ASSESSED AMOUNTS
Assessments Filed 10/15/2002
Lake Drive/Apollo Twilight Acres Sewer
West Shadow
Ponds Street
and Utility
Total
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Assessed Amount 52,085,919.91 $240,491 33 5401,297 01 52,727,708.25
Land Sale Proceeds ..... .............. ... ..... . . ...„ 161,609.00 - 181,609.00
Community Development Stock Grant...–. ....... .. ....... . .... 125,000 00 125,000.00
Anoka County Signal Agreement ..... . ...... ....—......„ 40,730.00 40,730.00
TOTAL SOURCES 52.288.258.91 $365,491.33 5401,297.01 53,055,047.25
USES OF FUNDS
Project Construction 2,196,976.00 355,000.00 385,000.00 2,938,976.00
Capitalized Interest 47,239.79 5,433.75 7,867.71 60,541.25
Total Underwriters Discount 22,990.00 2,640.00 4,400,00 30,030.00
Costs of Issuance 21,053.12 2,417.58 4,029.30 27,500.00
TOTAL USES . 52,288,258.91 5365,491.33 5401,297.01 53,055,047.25
Speingated Incomonsted
Advisors to the Put* Sector
Fla • UNOLAUCES.SF-Serfas 2002A Assessments-Isaus Summary
5/2'2002 233 PM
Page 7
PAR AMOUNTS OF SELECTED ISSUES
Series 2002A As-Lake Drive/Apo 2,085,919.91
Series 2002A As-Twilight Acres 240,491.33
Series 2002A As-West Shadow Po 401,297.01
TOTAL 2,727,708.25
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
* Assessments are actually spread over a term of ten years.
Re = LJNOLAKES.SF-Aggregate-
2/2002 2:32 PM
Page 8
$2,730,000
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A
DETAILED TOTAL ASSESSMENT INCOME
Series 2002A
Series 2002A
Series 2002A *
Assessment Income
Assessment Income
Assessment Income
DATE
Lake Drive/Apollo
Twilight Acres
West Shadow Ponds
TOTAL
2/01/2004
290,337.27
25,480.26
97,106.38
412,923.91
2/01/2005
290,337.26
25,480.26
97,106.40
412,923.92
2/01/2006
290,337.26
25,480.26
97,106.39
412,923.91
2/01/2007
290,337.26
25,480.26
97,106.40
412,923.92
2/01/2008
290,337.27
25,480.25
97,106.39
412,923.91
2/01/2009
290,337.26
25,4.80.25
-
315,817.51
2/01/2010
290,337.27
25,480.25
-
315,817.52
2/01/2011
290,337.26
25,480.25
-
315,817.51
2/01/2012
290,337.27
25,480.26
-
315,817.53
2/01/2013
290,337.26
25,480.25
-
315,817.51
2/01/2014
-
25,480.26
•
25,480.26
2/01/2015
-
25,4.80.26
-
25,480.26
2/01/2016
25,480.25
-
25,480.25
2/01/2017
-
25,480.24
-
25,480.24
2/01/2018
-
25,480.25
-
25,480.25
Total
2,903,372.64
382,203.81
485,531.96
3,771,108.41
PAR AMOUNTS OF SELECTED ISSUES
Series 2002A As-Lake Drive/Apo 2,085,919.91
Series 2002A As-Twilight Acres 240,491.33
Series 2002A As-West Shadow Po 401,297.01
TOTAL 2,727,708.25
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
* Assessments are actually spread over a term of ten years.
Re = LJNOLAKES.SF-Aggregate-
2/2002 2:32 PM
Page 8
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 12/31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LINOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-lssue Summery
5/2)2002 2:33 PM
Page 9
$2,727,708
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A Assessments
TOTAL ASSESSMENT INCOME
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+I
12/31/2002
-
-
-
12/31/2003
206,451.55
6.250%
206,472.36
412,923.91
12/31/2004
255,345.36
6.250%
157,578.56
412,923.92
12/31/2005
271,304.45
6.250%
141,619.46
412,923.91
12./31/2006
288,260.98
6.250%
124,662.94
412,923.92
12/31/2007
306,277.29
6.250%
106,646.62
412,923.91
12/31/2008
228,313.23
6.250%
87,504.28
315,817.51
12/31/2009
242,582.80
6.250%
73,234.72
315,817.52
12/31/2010
257,744.23
6.250%
58,073.28
315,817.51
12/31/2011
273,853.25
6.250%
41,964.28
315,817.53
12/31/2012
290,969.07
6.250%
24,848.44
315,817.51
12/31/2013
18,817.38
6.250%
6,662.88
25,480.26
12/3112014
19,993.46
6.250%
5,486.80
25,480.26
12/31/2015
21,243.05
6.250%
4,237.20
25,480.25
12/31/2016
22,570.74
6.250%
2,909.50
25,480.24
12/31/2317
23,981.41
6.250%
1,498.84
25,480.25
Total
2,727,708.25
-
1,043,400.16
3,771,108.41
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 12/31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LINOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-lssue Summery
5/2)2002 2:33 PM
Page 9
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 1V31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Pub lk Sector
File = LMOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-Lake Drive/Apollo
5/2,2002 2:33 PM
Page 10
$2,085,920
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A Assessments Lake Drive/Apollo
PROJECT ASSESSMENT INCOME
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+I
12/31/2002
-
-
-
-
12/31/2003
132,444.72
6.250%
157,892.55
290,337.27
12/31/2004
168,245,06
6.250%
122,092.20
290,337,26
12/31/2005
178,760.38
6.250%
111,576.88
290,337.26
12/31/2006
189,932.90
6.250%
100,404.36
290,337.26
12/31/2007
201,803.71
6.250%
88,533.56
290,337.27
12/31/2008
214,416.44
6.250%
75,920.82
290,337.26
12/31/2009
227,817.47
6.250%
62,519.80
290,337.27
12/31/2010
242,056.06
6.250%
48,281.20
290,337.26
12/31/2011
257,184.57
6.250%
33,152.70
290,337.27
12/31/2012
273,258.60
6.250%
17,078.66
290,337.26
Total
2,085,919.91
-
817,452.73
2,903,372.64
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 1V31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Pub lk Sector
File = LMOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-Lake Drive/Apollo
5/2,2002 2:33 PM
Page 10
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 12/31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LJNOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-Twifight Acres Sewer
5/2.12002 2:33 PM
Page 11
$240,491
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A Assessments Twilight Acres Sewer
PROJECT ASSESSMENT INCOME
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+I
12/31/2002
- -
-
-
-
12/31/2003
7,276.40
6.250%
18,203.86
25,480.26
12/31/2004
10,904.32
6.250%
14,575.94
25,480.26
12/31/2005
11,585.84
6.250%
13,894.42
25,480.26
12/31/2006
12,309.96
6.250%
13,170.30
25,480.26
12/31/2007
13,079.33
6.250%
12,400.92
25,480.25
12/31/2008
13,896.79
6.250%
11,583.46
25,480.25
12/31/2009
14,765.33
6.250%
10,714.92
25,480.25
12/31/2010
15,688.17
6.250%
9,792.08
25,480.25
12/31/2011
16,668.68
6.250%
8,811.58
25,480.26
12/31/2012
17,710.47
6.250%
7,769.78
25,480.25
12/31/2013
18,817.38
6.250%
6,662.88
25,480.26
12/31/2014
19,993.46
6.250%
5,486.80
25,480.26
12/31/2015
21,243.05
6_250%
4,237.20
25,480.25
12/31/2016
22,570.74
6.250%
2,909.50
25,480.24
12/31/2017
23,981.41
6.250%
1,498.84
25,480.25
Total
240,491.33
-
141,712.48
382,203.81
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 12/31/2003
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LJNOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-Twifight Acres Sewer
5/2.12002 2:33 PM
Page 11
$401,297
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A Assessments West Shadow Ponds Street and Utility
PROJECT ASSESSMENT INCOME *
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P+1
12/31/2002
-
-
-
-
12/31/2003
66,730.43
6.250%
30,375.95
97,106.38
12/31/2004
76,195.98
6.250%
20,910.42
97,106.40
12/31/2005
80,958.23
6.250%
16,148.16
97,106.39
12/31/2006
86,018.12
6.250%
11,088.28
97,106.40
12/31/2007
91,394.25
6.250%
5,712.14
97,106.39
Total
401,297.01
-
84,234.95
485,531.96
SIGNIFICANT DATES
Filing Date 10/15/2002
First Payment Date 12/31/2003
Springsted Incorporated File = LINOLAKES.SF-Series 2002A Assessments-West Shadow Ponds Street and Utility
Advisors to the Public Sector
* Assessments are actually spread over a term of ten years.
5/2/2002 2:33 PM
Page 12
Dated 7/01/2002
Delivery Date 7/01/2002
First Coupon Date 2/01/2003
YIELD STATISTICS
Bond Year Dollars $16,332.50
Average Life 5.983 Years
Average Coupon 4.0653987%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.2492853%
True Interest Cost (TIC) 4.2575627%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0429797%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 4.4570120%
IRS FORM 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.0653987%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.983 Years
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LINOLAKES.SF- Series 2002A -Issue Summary
5/ 2/2002 2:32 PM
Page 13
$2,730,000
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds
Series 2002A
NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Assessment
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +,'
CIF
Net New D/S
105% of Total
Income Annual Surplus
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8) (9)
2/01'2003
-
-
60,541.25
60,541.25
(60,541.25)
-
-
- -
2/0112004
275,000.00
2.700%
103,785.00
378,785.00
-
378,785.00
397,724.25
412,923.91 15,199.66
2/01/2005
280,000.00
3.100%
96,360.00
376,360.00
-
376,360.00
395,178.00
412,923.92 17,745.92
2/0112006
290,000.00
3.400%
87,680.00
377,680.00
-
377,680.00
396,564.00
412,923.91 16,359.91
2;0112007
305,000.00
3.650%
77,820.00
382,820.00
382,820.00
401,961.00
412,923.92 10,962.92
2/012008
310,000,00
3.900%
66,687.50
376,687.50
-
376,687.50
395,521.88
412,923.91 17,402.04
2/01/2009
235,000.00
4.050%
54,597.50
289,597.50
-
289,597.50
304,077.38
315,817.51 11,740.14
2/012010
245,000.00
4.200%
45,080.00
290,080.00
-
290,080.00
304,584.00
315,817.52 11,233.52
2210112011
250,000.00
4.300%
34,790.00
284,790.00
-
284,790.00
299,029.50
315,817.51 16,788.01
2/01/2012
260,000.00
4.400%
24,040.00
284,040.00
-
284,040.00
298,242.00
315,817.53 17,575.53
2/01/2013
280,000.00
4.500%
12,600.00
292,600.00
-
292,600.00
307,230,00
315,817.51 8,587.51
2/0112014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,480.26 25,480.26
2/0112015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,480.26 25,480.26
2/0112016
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,480.25 25,480.25
2/01/2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,480.24 25,480.24
2/012018
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,480.25 25,480.25
Total
2,730,000.00
-
663,981.25
3,393,981.25
(60,541.25)
3,333,440.00
3,500,112.00
3,771,108.41 270,996.41
Dated 7/01/2002
Delivery Date 7/01/2002
First Coupon Date 2/01/2003
YIELD STATISTICS
Bond Year Dollars $16,332.50
Average Life 5.983 Years
Average Coupon 4.0653987%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.2492853%
True Interest Cost (TIC) 4.2575627%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0429797%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 4.4570120%
IRS FORM 8038
Net Interest Cost 4.0653987%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.983 Years
Springsted Incorporated
Advisors to the Public Sector
File = LINOLAKES.SF- Series 2002A -Issue Summary
5/ 2/2002 2:32 PM
Page 13
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE
ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$2,730,000
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2002A
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, June 24, 2002, until 11:00 A.M., Central
Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal
price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the
submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach
Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal
shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated July 1, 2002, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2003. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2004 $275,000
2005 $280,000
2006 $290,000
2007 $305,000
2008 $310,000
2009 $235,000
2010 $245,000 2012 $260,000
2011 $250,000 2013 $280,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory
sinking fund redemption date of any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of
par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the
proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term Maturities" in the
spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
Page 14
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2008, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after February 1, 2009. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special
assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to finance street and
utility improvement projects in various areas of the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $2,699,970 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $27,300,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that
time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement
and no interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the
purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City.
No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates must be in level or
ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the
Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted.
Page 15
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the
purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis,
Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of
settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be
received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time.
Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by
action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any Toss suffered by
the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution
awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A
description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation
to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or
prior to delivery of the Bonds.
Page 16
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement' of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 110 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes
of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated May 13, 2002 BY ORDER OF THE CITE UNGIL
Ry -Chel Gaustad
Clerk
Page 17
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -41
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF
$2,730,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT
BONDS, SERIES 2002A
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County,
Minnesota (City) as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that:
(a) the following assessable public improvements (the Improvements)
have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof, by the City
pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act) and the City's charter
(Charter);
Project Designation & Description:
Improvements to Lake Drive /Apollo
Twilight Acres Sewer
Total Project Cost
West Shadow Ponds
Street and Utility $2,730,000
(b) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of
the affairs of the City to issue $2,730,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series
2002A (Bonds) pursuant to the Act and Charter to provide financing for the
Improvements.
2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in
the amount of $2,699,970. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the
Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $30,030. The excess of the
purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $2,699,970 will be credited to the debt service fund
for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The
Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of
Proposal:
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE
S THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE
FOLLOWING BASIS:
DJG- 214147v1
LN 140 -78
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$2,730,000
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2002A
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, June 24, 2002, until 11:00 A.M., Central
Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price
and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the submitted
Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted
prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be
deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless
of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated July 1, 2002, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable
on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2003. Interest will be
computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2004 $275,000 2007 $305,000 2010 $245,000 2012 $260,000
2005 $280,000 2008 $310,000 2011 $250,000 2013 $280,000
2006 $290,000 2009 $235,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory
sinking fund redemption date of any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of
par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the
proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term Maturities" in the
spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
DJG- 214147v1
LN 140 -78
•
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial
owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of
beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to
deposit the Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2008, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
• after February 1, 2009. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
•
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special
assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to finance street and utility
improvement projects in various areas of the City.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $2,699,970 and accrued interest on the total principal amount
of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the form
of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $27,300, payable to
the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety
Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of
Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted
Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify
each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are
awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to
submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire
•
•
•
transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the
next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the
Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The
Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no
interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates must be in level or ascending
order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date
of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the
Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance
shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the
Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall
be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
•
•
•
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the
purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis,
Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of
settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be
received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time.
Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action
of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City
by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will-undertake, pursuant to the resolution
awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A
description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation
to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior
to delivery of the Bonds.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information
relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement
within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of
the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser
is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place,
Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter
or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than
seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior
managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 110 copies of the
Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for
purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter.
Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its
proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a
contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring
the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated: May 13, 2002 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
•
/s/ Ann Blair
City Clerk
3. Springsted Incorporated is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in
accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council will meet at 7:00 o'clock
P.M. on Monday, June 24, 2002, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other
appropriate action with respect to the Bonds.
•
•
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 4A.
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 13 May 2002
SUBJECT Hiring a Full -Time Building Inspector
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
The city's 2002 Operating Budget included the addition of a full -time building inspector to
our stall. The city advertised, reviewed and interviewed candidates. The consensus of the group
was to offer the position to Patrick Moonen. Earlier this year however, the state legislature
threatened the city with the loss of revenue we had already built into our 2002 Operating Budget.
Staff felt it prudent to hold off hiring any new employees until the state's budget crisis had been
resolved. We have since heard from the legislature, that cities can count the funds included in the
revenue portions of their budgets.
City staff would therefore, recommend the hiring of Patrick Moonen as full -time building
inspector with the City of Lino Lakes. Patrick worked for the city last summer, and has been
working for us in a seasonal capacity for the past couple of months.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the Hiring of Patrick Moonen as building inspector.
2. Not approve the hiring at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
One.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 4B
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 13 May 2002
SUBJECT Sergeant's Labour Contract
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
City staff has been negotiating with Law Enforcement Labor Services for a contract for
police sergeants for the past several weeks. Staff has come up with a contract that we feel is fair to
both the city and the sergeants. The city's contribution to the sergeant's monthly insurance
premium is rising to the same level as the rest of city employees. They will also receive a 3% cost
of living, and .5% market raise in both years of this two -year contract.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the two -year contract with L.E.L.S.
2. Return staff to the negotiating table.
RECOMMENDATION
Number One.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 13, 2002
TOPIC: Review and Approve 2002 Park Board Goals
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The Park Board has recommended to the City Council the following goals for 2002:
Partial Match of DNR Grant for Clearwater Creek Park - ($100,000)
In July, 2001, the City of Lino Lakes was awarded a $125,000 Outdoor Recreation
Grant for the development of Clearwater Creek Park. As required during the application
process, the City Council committed to matching a successful grant award. Clearwater
Creek Park will be functional by this Fall due to the installation of playground equipment,
a gazebo, paved trails, landscaping, final grading, and seeding. The remaining required
$25,000 match needs to be made by the Summer of 2003. Future development plans
will include a 1/2 court basketball court, sand volleyball, and an irrigation system when
funds become available.
Recommended Funding Sources:
2002 General Fund, Capital Outlay — Parks $25,000
Park Dedication Fund — Undesignated Funds $75,000
Highland Meadows Park Development - ($199,200)
Highland Meadows Park was master planned earlier this year with the Park Board
approving the master plan in April, 2002. This four acre park is located at 607 Lois
Lane and will primarily serve residents in Highland Meadows, Bluebill Ponds, Mar Don
Acres, Carole's Estates, and Twilight Acres.
Preliminary total development costs are $383,000, with 25% of the costs designated for
removals, earthwork, erosion control, importing and spreading topsoil. Further
evaluation of existing site conditions may significantly reduce the total development
costs. Assuming City Council approval, staff hopes to have Highland Meadows Park
general site work completed, playground equipment installed, and the base of trails
installed by this Fall.
Recommended Funding Sources:
Park Dedication Fund — Designated Funds
Bluebill Ponds /Highland Meadows 3rd Addition $175,800
Park Dedication Fund — Designated Funds
VFW Playground Equipment Donations $23,400
A copy of the master plan and preliminary master plan cost estimates are attached for
your review.
Birch Park Trail (Up To $20,000)
This trail segment has been "in the works" since 1996 and is finally near reality. The
City Attorney continues to work with the property owner's attorney to execute the
proposed agreement. Construction documents have been prepared and are ready to
go out for bid when the proposed agreement has been executed. Total project costs
including attorney fees, easement acquisition costs, engineering fees, and construction
costs may exceed the designated funds for this project by as much as $20,000.
Recommended Funding Sources:
Park Dedication Fund — Undesignated Funds $20,000
I have attached a summary of the Park Dedication Fund that reflects the 2002 Park
Board goals.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is my recommendation that the City Council approve the 2002 Park Board Goals and
direct staff to implement the goals as presented.
5/8/02
RD /Park Board /greensheet 2002 goals
•
•
Highland Meadows Park Master Plan City of Lino Lakes
Highland Meadows Park Master Plan Project
Date: April 4`h, 2002 Preliminary Master Plan Cost Estimate
Description of Work
Cost
1
General Sitework
Removals, earthwork, & erosion control: $30,000
Import and spreading of topsoil (approx. 6300cy): $63,000
93,000.00
2
Landscaping
Seed /Sod: $16,000
Landscape Improvements (budget amount): $20,000
36,000.00
3
Asphalt Trails
8' wide trails: $20,000
6' wide trails: $ 2,000
22,000.00
4
Children's Play Area
Equipment (installed): $50,000
Curb: $ 7,500
Resilient Surfacing: $ 4,000
Concrete Walks: $ 3,200
64,700.00
5
Arbor Seating Area
(Includes concrete pad & arbor structure - budget amount)
35,000.00
6
Park Shelter Structure
(Includes shelter structure & concrete pad - budget amount)
45,000.00
7
Basketball 1/2 Court
(Includes asphalt, goal standard, & color coating)
8,000.00
8
Sand Volleyball Court
4,500.00
9
Miscellaneous Site Amenities
(Includes trash receptacles, benches and picnic tables with concrete pads
- budget amount)
18,000.00
10
Site Irrigation
(Includes meter, enclosure, and water & electrical service - assumes that
water & electrical service are readily accessible and water pressure is
adequate)
22,000.00
Development Subtotal:
10% Contingency (fees, surveying, etc.)
348,200.00
34,820.00
Development Total:
383,020.00
Brauer & Associates, Ltd.
1
•
As of May 8, 2002
r M
N
10
Current Balance
E
E
•
2001 Park Board Goals
199& Goals trail /land acquisition - Trappers Crossing
2001 Park Board Goals
2002 Park Board Goals
2001 Park Board Goals
2001 Park Board Goals
2000 General Fund Capital Outlay
2002 Park Board Goals
2002 Park Board Goals
$23,400 Transferred to Highland Meadows Park Development
000`09$
O
L6
to
000`017$
O°
Nr'�
EA
O
O
EA
000'9$
0
N
CD
rnLov
v
Q
EA
O
ta
$o
O
CO_
`_
IPheasant Hills Trail Connection to Regional Park
c
CU
E
CZ
O
N
0
D
c
m
c
O
.U)
CT
o
1-
Y
L
Q
L
L
00
1 Birch Park Trail Development __
Birch Park Trail Development
IBehm's Park Development
'Trail Renovation
J Black Duck Trail Project
(Highland Meadows Park Development
(Clearwater Creek Park DNR Grant Match
(Lino Air Park
Playground Equipment - VFW
Clearwater Creek Trail Buffering
N r N- CC00
a) O NJ:
) CV
69- 69
Total Designated Funds
Total Undesignated Funds
2002 Revenues
Y
U
7
c
O Y
t U
.O N
Q m
• 4;
cA'
7/
n E
W U)
o E
CO N
• c
(0
.c N
CD
is
E
W
1-
O
0
c
0
8
CO
u-
O
0
U)
6)
U
m
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
DATE:
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND:
1A
AGENDA ITEM 1-3A
Mary Alice Divine
5/13/02
Consideration of Resolution 02 -42 hiring Schoell &
Madson, Inc. for a TIF Redevelopment District
Analysis
This contract for professional services is to provide a Building Condition
Assessment and Site Coverage Analysis for two potential tax increment
financing redevelopment districts (see attached map). This is a necessary step in
determining the feasibility of creating TIF districts to assist with development and
redevelopment of these two areas of the Town Center.
The engineering firm of Schoell & Madson, Inc. has proposed to complete
inspections and prepare a report for a cost not to exceed $6,900 plus
reimbursible expenses. City staff will contact homeowners and businesses and
explain the intent of the assessment and make arrangements for the firm to
complete its inspections.
At its April meeting EDAC recommended the City Council consider moving
forward with determining the feasibility of TIF Redevelopment Districts in the
Town Center, as part of long term planning for the Village project and
redevelopment of Lake Drive.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 02 -42 authorizing a Building Condition Assessment
and Site Coverage Analysis.
2. Do not approve the Resolution.
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
1111
Option 1
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -42
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND
SITE COVERAGE ANALYSIS FOR PROPERTIES IN THE TOWN CENTER
WHEREAS, the City Council has taken certain actions toward the future development of
the Town Center area, including the acquisition of property, discussions with developers,
discussions with the YMCA, successful applications for Livable Communities Grants
from the Metropolitan Council, and the completion of an economic feasibility study;
WHEREAS, the City Council at this time desires to explore the potential for development
and redevelopment opportunities provided by the creation of Redevelopment Tax
Increment Financing Districts;
WHEREAS, staff has outlined the scope of potential Redevelopment Districts and has
obtained quotes for the preparation of a Building Condition Assessment and Site
Coverage Analysis, and has recommended Schoell & Madson, Inc. as the consultant for
the study.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA that the preparation of the study is hereby authorized, and
that Schoell & Madson, Inc. shall be the consultant retained to prepare said study at a cost
not to exceed $6,900 in accordance with the letter of proposal.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of May, 2002
John Bergeson, Mayor
Ann Blair, City Clerk
•
•
•
April 17, 2002
Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Engineering • Surveying • Planning
Soil Testing • Environmental Services
www.schoellmadson.com
Ms. Mary Alice Divine
Economic Development Assistant
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182
RE: Proposed Lake Drive North & South TIF Districts
Building Condition Assessments & Site Coverage Analysis
Dear Ms. Divine;
•
As per our phone discussion, we at Schoell & Madson, Inc. are pleased to present the following
fee proposal for your consideration of the above referenced projects. As per your Request for a
Fee Proposal, we would prepare a Building Condition assessment for each of the structures you
identified as being located within the boundaries of the two proposed TIF district. We will also
develop area coverage calculations from information we would collect from the County
surveyors office for the approximately 28.5 acre and 15.8 acre proposed district. We will also
attend an informational meeting for the affected property owners and planning commission and
City Council meetings to awnser any questions.
Inspection Phase:
If you accept our proposal, the City will notify all occupants requesting permission to enter the
premises. If granted permission by the property owners, we will conduct detailed inspections of
each structure's physical plant from both an environmental condition assessment as well as a
building code and structural condition assessment to identify substandard or non - compliance
conditions in each structure which the total cost of upgrading would exceed 15% of the cost for a
new structure. Photographic documentation of each condition identified will be taken for report
exhibits. We will also make ourselves available for residential inspections in the early evening
hours to accommodate residents work schedules where necessary.
Report Preparation Phase:
We will prepare individual sections for each structure in a single report for each of the proposed
TIF Districts. For each structure inspected, the report will detail substandard conditions and
contain rough cost estimates for all corrective remodeling or repair actions required to bring each
structure up to current building code standards or acceptable environmental conditions such as
removal of underground storage tanks, mercury containing equipment, or asbestos containing
materials. Structures that we are not given permission to inspect will also be identified and
Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer
10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 • Minneapolis, MN 55305 -1525
Office (952) 546 -7601 • Fax [952) 546 -9065
•
•
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
determinations will be made regarding there condition, the reasoning for our conclusions will
also be discussed.
Exhibits will be prepared to document identified conditions used to justify the State's
`substandard conditions rule' to exceed 15% of a new buildings cost. We will also verify that the
district meets the required percent of coverage rule using the most current aireal photography
available overlayed to meats & bounds property descriptions provided by the county recorders
office.
COMPENSATION: We have made certain basic assumptions that we will fisically inspect all
the structures located with in the two districts and that we will be required to make multiple trips
to complete the inspections.
Both Reports: $ 6,900.00 [not to exceed]
Reimbursable expenses such as plotting, printing, photography, delivery services, postage, and
mileage will be billed to you at cost plus a 15% administration fee. Reimbursable expenses are
over and above basic compensation. These costs should not exceed $200.00 under normal
circumstances.
Thank you for your consideration of our proposal. We look forward to working with you on this
project. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Very truly yours,
SCH
ELL & 1V) ADSON, IN .
Charles F. Habiger, AIA, CID
Director, Environmental & Planning Servic
Cc: Paul Steinman
•
•
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
This proposal represents the entire understanding between The City of Lino Lakes and Schoell &
Madson, Inc. in respect to the scope of work and the fee's proposed and may only be modified in writing
when signed by both parties. The proposal shall remain valid and shall not be withdrawn until thirty (30)
days from the Date of Proposal.
Payments are due and payable thirty (30) days from the date of Schoell & Madson, Inc. invoice.
Amounts unpaid thirty (30) days after the date of invoice shall bear interest at the rate of one (1) percent
per month.
If this fee proposal satisfactorily sets forth your understanding of the scope of work to be completed by
Schoell & Madson, Inc., please sign both copies of this letter in the space provided below. Please retain
one copy for your records and return one copy to Schoell & Madson, Inc.
Accepted this day of , 2002
by:
signatory: title:
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : April 3, 2002
TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m.
TIME ENDED : 8:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Dahl, Carlson,
O'Donnell, and Reinert
MEMBERS ABSENT : Mayor Bergeson
Staff members present: Administration Director, Dan Tesch; Economic Development
Assistant, Mary Alice Divine (part); Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Community
Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Finance
Director, Al Rolek; and City Clerk, Ann Blair
THORP PROPERTY — MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST — JEFF JOYER
City Clerk Blair distributed an information packet from City Planner Smyser regarding
this issue. The information advised the City received an application for a building permit
for a new house. The lot in question has a large garage on it but no house. The size of
the existing garage exceeds the maximum square footage for accessory buildings.
Obviously, a variance would be needed for the addition of the proposed attached garage.
The Associate Planner began researching the variance application. She discovered that
the lot in question was not a legal parcel by itself. It is part of a larger tax parcel. The
two lots platted in 1948 were subsequently combined. To split them apart requires a
minor subdivision. The minimum lot size in the area is ten acres. The existing property
is smaller than that and reducing it further increases the nonconformity.
Mr. Jeff Joyer, realtor for Mr. and Mrs. Thorp, reviewed the background of the lot history
and distributed a map showing the property in question.
Community Development Director Grochala noted the City has no provision for an
administrative subdivision. The subdivision has to go through the application and review
process, and ultimately must be approved by the Council. Because the property is less
than ten acres, staff would recommend denial of the subdivision request.
Acting Mayor Reinert questioned whether the County, without the permission of the
property owners, combined the property. City Clerk Blair stated she has discussed this
issue with the County. The County assured the City that lots do not get combined without
a request from the property owners.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
APRIL 3, 2002
Councilmember O'Donnell inquired about the variance request for the garage.
Mr. Joyer stated the garage was built in 1975. The setback for the garage was met at that
time. He stated that Mr. and Mrs. Thorp did not ask the County to combine the lots. He
further stated they were unaware that the lots were combined.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the new garage with the existing
garage would exceed the accessory structure requirements.
Mr. Joyer stated Mr. and Mrs. Thorp were allowed to sell Lot 30 four years ago.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the City Clerk at that time certified
the deed in 1998. That should not have happened and the Council did not approve it.
Mr. Joyer stated the sale of this lot is part of the Thorp's long term retirement plan.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the subdivision request would have to
go through the City process that will also include a variance request. The City needs to
make Findings of Fact to support the request.
Councilmember O'Donnell inquired about the grandfather clause. Community
Development Director Grochala stated this request is excluded from the grandfather
clause because the lots were at some point combined. The applicant needs to demonstrate
proof that they did not want the lots combined.
Acting Mayor Reinert stated he is okay with the subdivision request because they will be
using the lots as they were intended. The bigger issue is the variance request.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated he would support the subdivision request but needs
more information on the variance.
Councilmember Carlson stated she is going to visit the area. She stated she is undecided
but is hearing solid reasons from staff why the subdivision request should not be
approved.
Councilmember Dahl stated she is also undecided. The County has to have something to
back up their claim that the property owner did request that the lots be combined.
Acting Mayor Reinert stated the subdivision is not a big issue because it fits in with the
area. The garage is the issue. Both requests need to go through the City process.
DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT ALONG LAKE DRIVE, MARY ALICE
DIVINE
2
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002
Community Development Assistant Divine stated a discussion needs to be held regarding
the development and redevelopment along Lake Drive on the south and north side of the
interchange. The City has a new proposal from the Beard Group for the Village. One
way to pay for that is to develop a new tax increment finance district. She referred to a
map pointing out a possible new district that includes the Tagg property. She also
highlighted the homes and businesses along Lake Drive that would be affected by the new
district. She stated staff needs Council direction regarding this issue because studies and
analysis needs to be done relating to this area.
The proposed district would have to meet necessary criteria for a redevelopment district.
If the Council wants to move forward a contract will be presented to the Council at a
future meeting.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if TIF could be used for only certain projects.
Community Development Assistant Divine stated the district would be a redevelopment
district that allows for more leeway. The district can be used for many types of
businesses as well as infrastructure.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if the district will limit what type of development can
be developed. Community Development Assistant Divine stated there are no restrictions
as to what type of development can be done in a redevelopment district.
Councilmember Dahl requested an updated list of all the TIF districts within the City.
Communities Development Assistant Divine stated she could update the current list and
distribute it to the Council. There are three properties along Lake Drive that are currently
for sale. Staff will talk to all property owners once the Council provides direction.
Acting Mayor Reinert inquired about a timeline regarding the proposed district. He
expressed concern regarding the homes already being put up for sale. Another concern is
the bridge over I35 and that not being constructed for at least a few years.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the information regarding the
proposed district would take one to two months to put together. It would take at least
three months after that to develop the district. The earliest the City would see
development is 2003.
Acting Mayor Reinert stated there will eventually be commercial development in that
area. He stated he does not want people to think the Council is pushing residents out of
their homes to develop commercial property. He stated he does like having as many
options as possible and it doesn't hurt to investigate the possibility of a new district.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated the City should see if the area would qualify for the
redevelopment district. He inquired about the costs of the study. Community
Development Assistant Divine stated the study will cost $7,000 - $10,000.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002
• Community Development Director Grochala stated the cost of the study is eligible for
reimbursement if the district is established.
•
•
Councilmember Carlson stated she would also like more information about the possibility
of a district. She stated she is more comfortable with the idea of a district on the
southern portion of the area and wants to hear comments from EDAC. She expressed
concern regarding Schwann's not wanting to sell their property and the neighborhood to
the north of Target.
Councilmember Dahl stated the issue needs to be explored but she is concerned about the
cost also. She stated again that she would like an updated list of TIF districts within the
City and asked if the bank would be included in the district.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the bank would not be included if a
redevelopment district is developed.
FIVE -YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN, AL ROLEK
Finance Director Rolek distributed and reviewed in detail a draft of the Five -Year
Financial Plan Years 2002 -2006 noting the assumptions that were used to develop the
Plan. He stated a public hearing will be held on May 13, which gives the City plenty of
time to amend the Plan. The Plan was developed to be used as a guideline only.
Finance Director Rolek also reviewed revenue with and without levy limits.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if the Council will be asked to approve the Plan
because there is a deficit in the Plan that has to be addressed. Finance Director Rolek
stated the Plan will have to be approved by the Council.
Acting Mayor Reinert advised Councilmembers to review the Plan and compile questions
for staff.
Finance Director Rolek also reviewed the Capital Improvement Plan that included
infrastructure and street improvements, park and trail improvements and equipment
replacement. He noted the park and trail improvements are based on the referendum
being approved.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if the Plan is a rolling Plan. Finance Director Rolek
stated the Plan is a rolling Plan and will be updated yearly.
Resolution No. 02 — 24, Setting the Public Hearing for the Five -Year Financial Plan, will
be on the regular Council agenda Monday, April 8, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
HOLTE POND CONDEMNATION PROCESS UPDATE, JIM STUDENSKI
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002
• City Engineer Studenski advised the Holte pond is in the Weber Addition outside of the
existing easement. This issue has been discussed previously by the Council. The City is
at the point of eminent domain to obtain the additional easement. Staff has submitted the
necessary paperwork to the City Attorney. A time frame regarding the eminent domain
process will be available in a few weeks. Staff will obtain bids to finish the work on the
pond and storm sewer.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated the City wanted to negotiate with the homeowner and
only use eminent domain as a last resort. City Engineer Studenski stated the City is
currently at the point of eminent domain.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated the pipe will not completely solve the issue of water in
neighbors' basements. If the homeowner keeps filling the pond the City can then
eliminate the pond completely with the eminent domain process.
City Engineer Studenski advised a schedule regarding this issue will be provided at a
future Council meeting.
YOUTH RESOURCE OFFICER FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, DAVE
PECCHIA
III Chief Pecchia advised on March 20, 2002, the City was notified it will be receiving a
COPS in Schools grant award for one new full -time officer at an estimated cost of
$ 125,000. This is a three year grant and applies to salaries and benefits for an officer
hired after March 1, 2002.
•
A tentative offer of employment will be made to Jessica Halloran, Senior CSO. The
appointment will be conditioned upon successful completion of a physical and psychiatric
exam. If approved, the new officer will be placed in the Centennial School District's new
Blue Heron Elementary School.
The City is required to keep the officer on with the City for one year after the grant
expires.
Chief Pecchia noted information will be provided to the Council regarding the technology
grant at a future work session. The City may also apply for a federal grant to pay for
additional officers in 2003. This issue will also be discussed at a future work session.
This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, April 8, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
REFERENDUM UPDATE, DAN TESCH
Administration Director Tesch advised Councilmembers will be receiving a memo in
their mailbox from Public Services Director DeGardner regarding this issue.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002
• REGULAR AGENDA, APRIL 8, 2002
There were no changes to the regular Council agenda.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
•
•
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
April 22, 2002
Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
6
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : April 8, 2002
TIME STARTED : 6:35 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 7:40 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and
Mayor Bergeson
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: City Clerk, Ann Blair; City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Community
Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; and City Engineer, Jim
Studenski.
SETTING THE AGENDA
Councilmember Dahl requested the deletion of consideration of the January 14, 2002 from New
Business.
The agenda was approved as amended.
• CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Dahl seconded the
motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
ITEM ACTION
A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES:
i) April 8, 2002 (Check No. 64678 —
64776, $179,003.91)
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 13153 —
13170, $13,033.04)
ii) Approval of Premises Permit for gambling,
49 Club/Dead Broke Saddle Club,
Resolution No. 02 -33
•
Approved
Approved
Approved
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
• OPEN MIKE
Fire Chief Milo Bennett stated he was present this evening with Randy Ralstadt, representative of the
Sno- Barons Snowmobile Association, who wished to make a donation to the Centennial Fire District.
•
•
Mr. Ralstadt stated for 36 years the Sno - Barons have put on the largest grass drag snowmobile event
in the world. He indicated his organization has begun to use more of its profits each year to put back
into the community and the snowmobiling population in general. He provided Fire Chief Bennett
with a $1,000 donation for the Fire Department's water rescue equipment trailer.
Fire Chief Bennett indicated the Fire Department's current trailer is inadequate and the generous
donation from the Sno - Barons Snowmobile Association will allow the purchase of a new trailer. He
indicated, in addition to water rescue equipment, the trailer will house a department snowmobile used
for off -road accidents.
On behalf of the Centennial Fire District, Fire Chief Bennett expressed his appreciation to the Sno-
Barons Snowmobile Association for their $1,000 donation.
On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Bergeson expressed appreciation for this donation.
City Attorney Hawkins recommended that formal action be taken to accept this donation.
Councilmember Dahl moved to accept the donation of $1,000 from the Sno - Barons Snowmobile
Association for the Centennial Fire District equipment trailer. Councilmember Reinert seconded the
motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
No one else was present for open mike
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, LINDA WAITE SMITH
Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -24, Setting Public Hearing for the Five -Year Financial Plan
— Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Waite Smith advised the Lino Lakes City Charter requires
the preparation of a five -year financial plan for the City. It further requires that a public hearing be
held on the plan. Staff has prepared a draft of the 2002 -2006 Five -Year Financial Plan for City
Council consideration. Adoption of Resolution 02 -24 would set the public hearing required by the
Charter for the regular City Council meeting on May 13, 2002, at 6:30 p.m.
City Administrator Waite Smith advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02 -24, Setting
the public hearing on the Five -Year Financial Plan.
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -24, Setting the public hearing on the Five -
Year Financial Plan. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion.
2
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL S, 2002
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -24 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, LINDA WAITE SMITH
Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -31, Conditional job offer for Youth Resource Officer at
elementary schools — Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Waite Smith advised on March 20,
2002, the City was notified that it will be receiving a COPS in Schools Federal grant award for one
new, full -time officer at an estimated cost of $125,000.00. This is a three -year grant and applies to
salaries and benefits for an officer hired after March 1, 2002.
City Administrator Waite Smith indicated, as the City promotes from the ranks of its Community
Service Officers (CSO), a tentative offer of employment will be made to Jessica Halloran, the City's
senior CSO. The appointment will be contingent upon successful completion of a physical and
psychological evalutations.
City Administrator Waite Smith indicated Resolution No. 02 -31 provides for the Youth Resource
Officer position. If approved, the Officer will be placed in the Centennial School District's Rice Lake
Elementary School.
• City Administrator Waite Smith advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02 -31,
Authorizing the hiring of Jessica Halloran as full -time Youth Resource Officer.
•
Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -31, Authorizing the hiring of Jessica
Halloran as full -time Youth Resource Officer. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion.
Councilmember Carlson commended Chief of Police Pecchia for obtaining this COPS in the Schools
grant for a needed and well - deserved program for the youth in Lino Lakes.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -31 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
There was no Public Safety Department report.
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
There was no Public Services Department report.
3
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MIKE GROCHALA
•
•
SECOND READING, Ordinance 02 -02, Considering the public right -of -way vacation of part of
Fox Trail, Michael Grochala — Community Development Director Grochala advised Fox Trail is
shown on City maps as a 60 -foot wide stub street, approximately 171 feet in length, existing within
the Shenandoah 2nd Addition, located just southeast of the intersection of Arrowhead Drive and
Tomahawk Trail. Fox Trail was never actually constructed as a street, but was initially designed to
provide future access to the area south of the subdivision, which was undeveloped when the
Shenandoah 2nd Addition was developed.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated the Pineridge Addition has since developed to
the south of the Shenandoah 2nd Addition, but no street was ever constructed to connect Fox Trail.
Rather, a trail in Pineridge was constructed to the south of Fox Trail. Fox Trail has subsequently
become a trail corridor connecting to the Pineridge Trail, and has existed as such for several years.
The trail connects Arrowhead Drive in the Shenandoah 2nd Subdivision to Hawthorne Road in the
Pineridge Subdivision. In June of 2000, Rick DeGardner directed Engineering staff to survey the area
in anticipation of vacating part of Fox Trail, since it was not in use as a street right -of -way.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated, although Fox Trail technically remains a stub
street, it is not needed for street purposes. Right -of -way is only needed to maintain the existing trail
to Pineridge. As a result, it is the recommendation of staff that the west 20 feet and the east 20 feet of
Fox Trail be vacated, leaving the center 20 feet to serve as a trail to connect to the 15 -foot trail in the
Pineridge Subdivision.
Community Development Director Grochala advised staff recommends approval of the SECOND
Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -02, Vacating the west 20 feet and the east 20 feet of the Fox Trail right -
of -way.
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve the SECOND Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -02,
Vacating the west 20 feet and the east 20 feet of the Fox Trail right -of -way. Councilmember Reinert
seconded the motion.
Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea.
Councilmember O'Donnell voted yea. Councilmember Reinert voted yea.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ordinance No. 02 -02 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution 02 -25, Final Payment for 21St Avenue Lift Station, Jim Studenski —
City Engineer Studenski advised the contractor for the 21St Avenue Lift Station project is requesting
City approval of Payment No. 6 (Final) in the amount of $10,235.29. The project included the
construction of the lift station and the installation of a force main to the Metropolitan Council
interceptor on Cedar Street. The final payment is determined as follows:
4
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
• Original Contract Amount $452,445.00
Change Order No. 1 $5,004.00
Change Order No. 2 (Quantity Adjustment) $- 2,547.21
Contractor Amount to Date $454,901.79
Payments to Date $444,666.50
•
Final Payment Amount $10,235.29
City Engineer Studenski indicated the contract amount was based on estimated quantities, as is the
case with most City contracts. Change Order No. 2 adjusts the contract amount to reflect the actual
quantities installed.
City Engineer Studenski indicated the contractor has submitted all required documentation for final
payment on this project.
City Engineer Studenski advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02 -25, Approving
Payment No. 6 (Final) and Change Order No. 2 for the 21st Avenue Lift Station project.
Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -25, Approving Payment No. 6 (Final) and
Change Order No. 2 for the 21st Avenue Lift Station project. Councilmember Dahl seconded the
motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -25 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution 02 -26, Authorizing Plans and Specifications for the 2002 Sealcoat
Program, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski advised each year the City maintains its street by
sealcoating. Sealcoating places a thin layer of oil and rock on the street to enhance the surface.
Candidate streets include new streets that received the wear course two to three years ago and all
other streets are done on a five to seven year cycle. This year, approximately 6.5 miles of streets will
be sealcoated at an approximate cost of $114,000. The 2002 budget includes $58,800 for sealcoating.
The difference between the annual City budget amount and the total bid amount would be funded
from the City's Sealcoat Funds as this reflects the cost of the first time sealing of two new roadways.
City Engineer Studenski indicated, once ordered, the plans and specifications could be completed in
approximately two weeks, in time for consideration at the April 22, 2002 City Council meeting. The
engineering budget for preparation of the plans and specifications is $5,500.
City Engineer Studenski advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution 02 -26, Ordering the plans
and specifications for the 2002 Sealcoat Project.
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -26, Ordering the plans and
specifications for the 2002 Sealcoat Project. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion.
5
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -26 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution 02 -27, Authorizing Plans and Specifications for the 2002 Overlay
Program, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski advised the City undertakes a paving project
each year to place the final layer of bituminous, known as the wear course, in those developments
where the majority of the lots have been built upon. The funding for this work is provided by
assessments to the respective subdivisions. The subdivisions receiving wear course this year include
Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition, Trappers Crossing 3rd Addition, Peregrine Pass, and Pheasant Hills
Preserve 11th Addition.
City Engineer Studenski indicated the schedule for this project is as follows:
City Council orders Plans and Specifications
City Council approves Plans and Specifications
City Council authorizes ad for bids
Open bids
City Council awards contract
Construction Begins
April 8, 2002
April 22, 2002
April 22, 2002
May 21, 2002
May 28, 2002
June 10, 2002
411) City Engineer Studenski indicated the engineering budget for preparation of the plans and
specifications is $4,900.
City Engineer Studenski advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02 -27, Ordering the
plans and specifications for the 2002 Wear course Project.
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -27, Ordering the plans and specifications for
the 2002 Wear course Project. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -27 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution 02 -32, Approving Solid Waste Contract with Anoka County,
Michael Grochala — Community Development Director Grochala advised the City of Lino Lakes
receives SCORE funds each year from Anoka County. The SCORE funds are used to fund solid
waste recycling programs. Cities using SCORE funds allocated by Anoka County are required to
enter into a cooperative agreement with the County. Resolution No. 02 -32 approves and authorizes
this agreement.
Community Development Director Grochala advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No.
• 02 -32, Approve Anoka County Contract #2001 -0378, Agreement for Residential Recycling Program.
6
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Councilmember Carlson questioned whether the contract number of 2001 -0378 related to the year in
which the contract would be held. City Administrator Waite Smith indicated page one of the contract
stated the contract was being entered into on the 11th day of December, 2001. Therefore, she believed
the contract number was correct and did relate to the year of the contract.
Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -32, Approve Anoka County Contract
#2001 -0378, Agreement for Residential Recycling Program. Councilmember Dahl seconded the
motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -32 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -28, Authorizing Plans and Specifications for the West
Shadow Ponds Street Improvements, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski advised the
preliminary plat for West Shadow Ponds was approved in 2001. The developer, Richard S. Carlson
& Associates, has submitted a petition to have certain improvements installed by the City. All costs
for these improvements will be assessed back to West Shadow Ponds per the development agreement.
The improvements to be installed under City contract include the water main, sanitary sewer, storm
sewer, and the road pavement including aggregate base. The developer's contract will complete all
site grading, including construction of the roadway up to the top of the sub grade. The project limits
are from 621 Street to the south end of existing West Shadow Lake Drive.
City Engineer Studenski indicated the developer remains responsible for adhering to all of the
conditions of the preliminary plat approval. The trail on 62" Street must be installed, including
bituminous, before he can begin site grading. All of the site grading must be completed and verified
according to the approved plan, prior to the City proceeding with City- contracted work.
City Engineer Studenski added, assuming the City has all the necessary base information from the
developer's engineer, if ordered, the plans and specifications could be completed in time for
consideration at the May 13, 2002, City Council meeting. The engineering budget for preparation of
the plans and specifications is $7,800.
City Engineer Studenski noted he had provided the Councilmembers with copies of the development
agreement for West Shadow Ponds, which explained the process of the City installing these
improvements. The letter of credit has been verified and all other necessary documentation is up to
date.
City Engineer Studenski advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02 -28, Ordering the
plans and specifications for the West Shadow Ponds Street Improvements.
Councilmember Carlson requested an approximate cost of the proposed City improvements.
City Engineer Studenski provided the estimated costs as follows, which include trunk and unit
charges:
7
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Road pavement including aggregate base $100,000
Storm sewer $51,000
Sanitary sewer $43,000
Water main $45,000
Councilmember Carlson pointed out the City does not install these improvements for all residential
developments.
City Engineer Studenski agreed and indicated developers can request through petition that the City
install the utilities for a project. He pointed out that there have been other projects in the past for
which the City only installed the wear course on the roadway. He acknowledged the City has not
performed this type of work for a development for a few years but noted the City does have a program
in place to address these types of requests, which includes the requirement of an escrow, letter of
credit, etc.
Councilmember Dahl noted this request had been discussed during the Council work session and staff
had indicated the City may not wish to perform these types of projects in the future.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated the City may wish to consider whether they
will continue offering this option for residential developments. He noted there may be times when it
is appropriate for the City to perform the utility work for projects, but over the past few years the
majority of contractors have chosen to do all the work themselves. He acknowledged that it may be
better for the City to do less of these types of projects.
Councilmember Dahl questioned what would happen if a developer, for whatever reason, was unable
to complete the project and whether the City would be able to assess the cost of the installed utilities
to recoup its investment.
City Attorney Hawkins noted the development agreement includes a clause that the developer agrees
to the amount of assessment, up to a certain amount, and waives the right to appeal those assessments.
He noted the agreement includes a letter of credit requiring the developer to have 35 percent of the
cost of the project available and, if the developer defaulted on the agreement, the assessment would
be levied against the property. If the assessment was not paid, then the City could either buy the
property itself or put the property up for sale through public auction to recoup its investment.
City Engineer Studenski added the developer is required to provide an escrow so cash is available to
cover the preparation work, including plans and specifications, staking, etc.
Councilmember Carlson noted the development agreement indicated the entire cost of the
improvement incurred by the City shall be assessed against the property in accordance with City
policy. She asked if it would be possible for the City to not collect the full amount of the assessment
and noted there is a State Statute that does not allow an assessment for an amount higher than the
improvement would increase the value of the property.
8
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
• City Attorney Hawkins advised if the final cost of the project is equal to or less than the City
Engineer's estimate, then the developer cannot appeal the assessment.
•
•
Mayor Bergeson expressed concern regarding the issue of ownership of the property and whether the
developer or the future homeowners would be responsible for payment of the assessment.
City Attorney Hawkins indicated the assessment must be paid in full prior to a building permit being
issued on the project.
Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -28, Ordering the plans and specifications
for the West Shadow Ponds Street Improvements. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion.
Councilmember Carlson stated she respects the opinions of the other Councilmembers and staff,
however, she would not be voting in favor of this project. She noted the project was not included in
the City's annual budget, nor the draft five -year plan. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan has
numerous references to requiring infrastructure improvements to be paid by developers. She
acknowledged that the City would receive back the money invested in this project, however, she
noted the City does not install the infrastructure for all residential projects and she was concerned
about fairness to the other developers. She added that the City was not allowing some other projects
to go through due to road issues.
Councilmember Dahl asked what the normal repayment schedule is for an assessment. City Attorney
Hawkins stated this depends upon the project and some assessments schedules can run for up to 30
years.
Councilmember Dahl asked Councilmember Carlson to elaborate on her concerns regarding this
project.
Councilmember Carlson stated she has reviewed the City's Charter, which requires the Council to
approve projects according to the budget and this project was not included in the budget for this year.
Additionally, the project was not included in the five -year plan and the Comprehensive Plan specifies
that the City should not fund infrastructure improvements for private developments. She added the
City does not do this type of work for all developments and has not agreed to this type of project for a
number of years.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated this project would not affect the City's operating budget, only
the debt service levy. She questioned what would happen if the City, after approving the
development agreement, failed to follow through with the installation of infrastructure as called for in
the agreement.
It was the opinion of City Attorney Hawkins that because the City is contractually obligated to
perform this work, there would be no option for the City to not follow through. He stated if the City
failed to order the proposed improvements, this would result in a breach of contract.
9
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Regarding the concern of fairness to other developers, City Engineer Studenski noted this type of
request is driven by the developer and the City is simply responding to that request.
Councilmember Dahl asked if the City could have denied the petition to install the improvements.
City Engineer Studenski stated this would be an option, however, it is not outside normal practice for
the City to agree to this type of request.
City Attorney Hawkins suggested if the Council is concerned about this policy they review the City's
local improvement policy and consider the elimination of this financing option.
Councilmember Dahl requested confirmation that the reason the City agreed to this project was
because the option is available per City policy. Community Development Director Grochala
responded affirmatively. He noted it has been standard practice for the City to agree to these types of
requests and noted other recent 429 projects within the City.
Mayor Bergeson stated in some cases it is appropriate for the City to take the lead on development
projects. He felt the primary concern in this case was the size of the project and the amount of money
required in the letter of credit.
Councilmember Dahl expressed appreciation to staff for supplying the Council with copies of the
development agreement on such short notice.
• Motion carried 4 -1, Councilmember Carlson opposed.
Resolution No. 02 -28 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -29, Authorizing execution of Site Improvement
Performance Agreement with TCF Bank, Michael Grochala — Community Development Director
Grochala advised the City Council approved the site and building plans for the TCF Bank, with
conditions per Resolution No. 02 -11 on March 11, 2002. A revised set of plans incorporating the
required modifications prepared by Shea Architects, dated March 26, 2002, was received by the City
on March 27, 2002.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated, in accordance with the site and building plan
approvals, staff has prepared a Site Improvement Performance Agreement. The agreement provides
for the following:
1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit representing 35 percent of the site
improvement costs to ensure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans.
2. Waiver of procedure and appeal of special assessments for the Lake /Apollo Drive
Improvements up to an amount of $51,411.89.
3. Deposit of a cash escrow to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the
development and improvement of the site and developer improvements.
10
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Community Development Director Grochala indicated TCF Bank has reviewed the agreement and is
aware of the conditions set forth.
Community Development Director Grochala advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No.
02 -29, Authorizing execution of Site Improvement Performance Agreement with TCF Bank.
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -29, Authorizing execution of Site
Improvement Performance Agreement with TCF Bank. Councilmember Reinert seconded the
motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -29 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -30, Authorizing execution of Site Improvement
Performance Agreement with McDonald's Corporation, Michael Grochala — Community
Development Director Grochala advised the City Council approved the site and building plans for the
McDonalds, with conditions per Resolution No. 01 -168 on October 22, 2001. A revised set of plans
incorporating the required modifications prepared by Ryan Engineering dated February 4, 2002, was
received by the City on March 12, 2002.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated, in accordance with the site and building plan
approvals, staff has prepared a Site Improvement Performance Agreement. The agreement provides
for the following:
1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit representing 35 percent of the site
improvement costs to ensure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans.
2. Waiver of procedure and appeal of special assessments for the Lake /Apollo Drive
Improvements up to an amount of $139,406.
3. Deposit of a cash escrow to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the
development and improvement of the site and developer improvements.
Community Development Director Grochala advised staff recommends adoption of Resolution No.
02 -30, Authorizing execution of Site Improvement Performance Agreement with McDonald's
Corporation.
Councilmember Dahl asked, if this Resolution is approved this evening, when will the project begin.
Community Development Director Grochala indicated the developer intends to break ground on
Monday, April 15, 2002.
11
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -30, Authorizing execution of Site
Improvement Performance Agreement with McDonald's Corporation. Councilmember O'Donnell
seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 -30 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business to consider.
NEW BUSINESS
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
March 20, 2002 Work Session Meeting Minutes
March 25, 2002 Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Carlson requested the following changes to the March 25, 2002 Council Meeting
Minutes:
• On page four, third paragraph from the bottom, first sentence, the words "during a" should be
changed to "at the."
• On page 10, third paragraph from the bottom, the last sentence should be amended to read,
"...feeding at Trout Air is not their usual way to feed and noted there are fish in Peltier
Lake..."
• On page 11, second paragraph from the top, the first sentence should be amended to read,
"Councilmember Carlson stated that she would vote for the ordinance with the sunset
clause,..." The last sentence should be amended to read, "However, she could not in good
conscience vote for an angled line, the line needs to go straight across for the safety of our
citizens, grandchildren, children, as well as adults."
Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the March 20, 2002 Work Session Minutes, as submitted
and the March 25, 2002, Council Meeting Minutes, as amended. Councilmember O'Donnell
seconded the motion.
Motion carried, 4 -0 -1, Councilmember Dahl abstaining.
Motion carried unanimously.
12
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002
COMMUNITY CALENDAR APRIL 9 THROUGH APRIL 22, 2002:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 6:30 p.m., Planning & Zoning Board Meeting
Thursday, April 11, 2002, Joint Meeting between Charter Commission and City Council
Wednesday, April 17, 2002, 5:30 p.m., City Council Work Session
Saturday, April 20, 2002, 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m., Earth Day Celebration at Wargo Nature
Center
Monday, April 22, 2002, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Councilmember Reinert moved to adjourn at 7:40 p.m.
Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, April 22, 2002.
Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Lori Rolfson
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 1
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS EXCUSED
MEMBERS UNEXCUSED
CITY COUNCIL PRESENT
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
CHARTER COMMISSION
April 11, 2002
7:03 P.M.
8:35 P.M.
Dahl, Montain, S. Lane, Carlson, Zych
G. Lane, Bening, Christopherson,
Zastrow, DeMotts, and Rafferty
Aldentaler
Trehus
Dahl, Reinert, O'Donnell, Carlson and Bergeson
City Administra, or Linda Waite Smith (part) and
City Clerk, r (part)
n i lai (p
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
• Chair Montain called the regular meeting of the' ino L Charter Commission to order at 7:03
p.m. on April 11, 2002
•
JOINT MEETING WITH LINO; TY COUNCIL
Chair Montain thanked the Ci rt ' Council ` ttending the meeting this evening.
Discussion of Five -Year Plan ain stated the main issue to discuss is the Five -Year
Plan. The Charter Commission, staff;dCouncil have worked on the Plan for several years.
Chapter 7 of the Charter calls for a Five -Year Plan. Only one Plan has been submitted by staff
back in the late 1980's early 1990's. He stated the Charter Commission has continually asked
the City Council to complete the Plan. He asked where the Plan is and when it will be
completed.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the last Plan submitted was done by her and then the City
hired a new Finance Director. The Finance Director has completed the Plan and presented it to
the City Council at the last work session. She distributed a memo regarding the Plan noting the
public hearing has been set for Monday, May 13, 2002.
City Administrator Waite Smith continued stating the Plan contains the four sections required by
the City Charter:
1. Public Services Program
2. Capital Improvement Program
1
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 2
3. Capital Budget
4. Revenue Program.
City Administrator Waite Smith reviewed the draft summary that was included in the memo for
each of the program areas. She noted details may change based on further Council consideration.
Mayor Bergeson stated another issue that puts some uncertainty into the Plan is the
Comprehensive Plan that has not yet been approved by the Metropolitan Council.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the Metropolitan Council is extending their review period
for another 60 days.
Chair Montain stated the Plan is a big step forward for the City. Staff has done a lot of work. He
reminded the Council that Subd. 6 states a summary of the Plan has to be published.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the Finance .. aware of the publication
requirement and the format relating to publication h std.
Chair Montain stated the Charter calls for the Five -Y
Plan will be helpful after it is been updated a fe
He asked if staff feels that the
Administrator Waite Smith stated it is arty toy el1'. She stated the process of developing
the Plan did tell her that the City will hav t find d1f nt ways to accomplish the City's work
because staff can't always be adde•T a 11 "11 stimulate a lot of discussion among directors.
Councilmember Carlson state
allows the City to look at ho
e is ve
ects wil
py that the Plan is being completed because it
into the big plan.
Councilmember Dahl stated she is also `;spy the Plan is being completed. The City can now
plan ahead for purchases and know what equipment will be needed. The Charter requires the
Plan and it had to be completed. The City can figure out what to do in the years ahead even with
the changes in the legislature.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated that people do need to understand that there are a lot of
unknowns. This is a plan and guideline only and it may have to be changed due to the state law.
The Finance Director is very concerned that people understand that. The Plan will need constant
revision and will be updated every year.
Chair Montain noted the Plan could be helpful when a project is coming up because the City can
show the project had been in the Plan for many years.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the Plan can help sell a project but the projects may
• change as other projects may become more important.
2
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 3
Commissioner S. Lane asked what kind of Plan that City has previously had in place.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the City has always had a Five -Year Capital Improvement
Plan until last year.
Mayor Bergeson added that the Finance Staff has always done an informal budgeting plan one or
two years ahead of time. The formal process within the City has always been the budget process.
Commissioner S. Lane stated the City needs to stay on top of the updates each year so staff does
not get behind on the Plan.
Road Reconstruction Issues — Chair Montain stated part of this issue is the deterioration of
roads within the City. The Five -Year Plan has construction projects laid out for the next five
years. He stated staff must have the funds in mind to coplte those projects.
Mayor Bergeson state the Engineering and Plannin & tai ve' ugh all the streets and
roadways within the City and prioritized them. He s + e ass the Plan is based on that
Y an p assumes
prioritization.
• City Administrator Waite Smith stated there is
of the expectation that they will be complete
circumstances.
•
Mayor Bergeson stated the Co
projects. It is easy to do one b.°
decision to go to a slower gro
There is also the uncertainty of h
to the old way. How that is accompli;
City projects.
utting down specific projects because
is may change due to unknown
11 have an impact on the Plan and the City's
in a growing city. The Community has made the
City cannot count on new dollars for projects.
will start doing its new way of business as opposed
will also affect the details of the Five -Year Plan and
Chair Montain stated the Charter Commission had grown impatient about the Five -Year Plan and
does understand the newness of it. He stated he is very happy that progress on the Plan has been
made. He also indicated that he hopes the Plan will work as the Charter intended it to work. The
Plan can be amended if staff determines it does not work as the Charter intended so it will be
useful.
Councilmember Reinert stated the City needs to make sure it is a realistic Plan. He noted he
does have a lot of questions about that Plan that will be presented at the next work session.
Commissioner Bening asked if there is anything relating to the Charter's requirements that staff
felt was ridiculous to do relating to the Five -Year Plan.
3
•
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 4
City Administrator Waite Smith stated staff did not indicate there was anything that seemed out
of line relating to the Charter's requirements. There is just the concern that people understand
the City does have all four sections of the requirements done. She noted she will ask the Finance
Director if any part of the requirements seemed unrealistic.
Councilmember Reinert stated a discussion was held at the last joint meeting regarding the
possibility of an annual amount of dollars being approved by the voters to put into a road
reconstruction fund.
Commissioner Zastrow asked if the projects list in the Plan are approved if the Five -Year Plan is
approved.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated the projects will not be approved just because the Five -
Year Plan is approved. Each road project has to be voted on individually.
Chair Montain stated the Council decides if road pro ld be voted on individually �` y or as a
group of projects.
Councilmember Reinert stated the City currently has no ee for funding road reconstruction
Y Y � g
projects. He asked if it is a good idea to have . .11amo t of money approved each year by
the voters to start a road reconstruction fund.
City Administrator Waite Smith stated th ttorn advised the City would still have to get
projects approved by voters to use oney': n if it is in a special fund.
Chair Montain stated that acc to th''arter, the City has to collect dollars for a specific
project. However, the idea o .,� £1 fund for roadways has been discussed previously.
Mayor Bergeson stated the City intendE put the next road project referendum on the next
ter.
ballot. The School District is also voting on another referendum.
Charter — Update — Chair Montain stated the Charter Commission is trying to clarify the term
Clerk/Treasurer within the Charter document. The overall goal is to make the Charter easier to
read and understand. He noted the two ways the City can amend the Charter and advised the
Council that this issue may be presented to the Council at some point in the future.
Commissioner Bening asked if there is any work being done to put the Charter on the City's web
site.
City Administrator Waite Smith advised the Charter is on the City's web site.
City Clerk Blair stated Mr. Addicks, Attorney for the League of Minnesota Cities, has provided
the City with information on the clarification of the clerk/treasurer term. He has suggested a way
to change the term and he is very knowledgeable.
4
•
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 5
Mayor Bergeson stated he hopes the Commission and the Council can handle the clarification.
He stated he only would like to go to the voters if there is a major change in the Charter.
Chair Montain thanked the Council for attending the meeting and making progress on the Five -
Year Plan. He indicated he will be happy when the Plan is completed and looks forward to
scheduling another joint meeting next year.
City Clerk Blair stated two appointments have gone to the Judge but the City has not received
any word back from him yet. The City will advertise for the Commission openings again.
Chair Montain called for a short recess at 7:50 p.m. noting the Commission will continue with
the regular agenda after the break. Councilmember's were excused from the meeting.
Chair Montain reconvened the meeting at 7:53 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chair Montain advised the Charter Commission minu es 11 as other Board minutes were not
in the packets. It has been suggested that the min e e mated as often as possible to save
time and money. _,ri, . nutes e-mailed please speak to the
City Clerk.
City Clerk Blair stated the program adobe "ac o at allows documents to be searchable. You can
also index files and there is a freayder�i a'' on the web. She stated she will provide
information to anyone who is fob et his or her computers set up.
Commissioner Bening inquired a frame for sending the minutes by computer.
City Clerk Blair stated the minutes will be sent out after the Council approves them. The City's
Director of Administration, Dan Tesch, has put together the website and he coordinates with an
outside person to get information onto the web site. The City is making changes to the web site
all the time.
January 10, 2002
Commissioner Christopherson noted Review /Accept Official Charter & By -laws should be added
to this evening's agenda.
MOTION by Commissioner S. Lane, seconded by Commissioner Christopherson to approve the
January 10, 2002 meeting minutes, as presented. Motion carried with Commissioner Zastrow
and DeMotts abstaining.
REPORTS OF THE CHAIR
5
•
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 6
Commissioner Applications — Term Clarification — Chair Montain advised Commissioner G.
Lane and Commissioner Trehus's terms are in the process of being clarified by the City Clerk.
The openings for the Commission have been advertised and will be advertised again.
City Clerk Blair stated the judges do prefer that the City send in batches of applications as
opposed to one at a time.
REPORT OF COMMITTEES
Clerk/Treasurer Amendment — League of Cities Opinion (Commissioner Trehus) —
Commissioner Dahl stated Commissioner Trehus e- mailed her information regarding this issue.
She distributed a copy of the information.
Commissioner Bening stated the attorney has recommend d;that the City use Plan A to modify
the Charter regarding the clerk/treasurer term. He s e subcommittee meet with the
City Clerk to work on this issue.
Chair Montain directed the subcommittee to meet with Clerk and bring back a final
recommendation to the July meeting so the Co can R,vto on it.
Five -Year Plan Review (Chair Montain) - Cliasr Arlo "yin advised this issue will remain on the
July agenda for an update. He indicated heir very " `; , to see the progress the City has made.
Commissioner Dahl stated the Administrator think the Five -Year Plan is a
good idea because of the chan ges in the 1i t lature.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Review City Council Meeting Minutes for Charter Compliance — Chair Montain asked if the
Commission had identified any problems with the City Council meeting minutes.
Commissioner DeMotts noted one set of minutes he had received did not have all of the pages.
The Commission indicated no problems were identified with the City Council meeting minutes.
By- Laws /Section 9. (Appointments) Amendment (Secretary Rafferty) — This item was tabled
until the July 2002 meeting.
Charter Archives Report (Secretary Rafferty) — Chair Montain stated he did not help
Commissioner Rafferty with this project.
6
•
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 7
Commissioner Rafferty advised Commissioner Carlson was also going to help get the documents
sorted. He stated there is work that needs to be done and he will select a date to get the
documents sorted and organized.
Annual Report and Chair Recommendations Distribution (Secretary Rafferty) —
Commissioner Rafferty stated the Annual Report and Chair Recommendations have been sent to
the Judge.
Charter Document — Chair Montain stated the Commission needs to determine if the document
dated March 10, 1990 is the official Charter.
Commissioner Christopherson stated the City Clerk did distribute a new copy of the Charter.
The question is whether or not it is a good copy for the Commission to work from.
Commissioner Rafferty asked how the Commission can = e a copy of the Charter that does not
have signatures.
Commissioner Bening stated the original Charter wa 9 compu system and was lost. The
document was then scanned into the new computer s
Commissioner Rafferty stated the City also needs to ® aye hard copy in the file as a safety valve.
Commissioner Bening stated the City Clerk in ch of keeping the Charter and the
Commission needs to rely on her.ndia he will discuss this issue with the City Clerk.
Commissioner Zych stated he
stated he will investigate and
s a copy of the Charter at the County or State. He
e Commission at the next meeting.
Chair Montain stated the Commission 1 assume the copy they have is the working copy but
will find out if the original copy is at City Hall.
NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Schedule _Commissioner Dahl stated she has been approached by several members of
the Commission who do not think it is necessary to meet four times a year.
Chair Montain stated it is in the by -laws that the Commission must meet a minimum of four
times a year.
Set July 2002 Agenda —
Chair Montain advised the following items will appear on the July 2002 meeting agenda:
• Approval of April 2002 Minutes
7
Charter Commission
April 11, 2002
Page 8
• Commissioner Applications — Term Clarification
• Clerk/Treasurer Amendment
• Five -Year Plan Update
• Review Council Meeting Minutes for Charter Compliance
• By- Laws /Section 9. Amendment and Use of Term Clerk/Treasurer
• Charter Archives Report
• Charter Document
• Set October 2002 Agenda
ADJOURN
MOTION by Commissioner S. Lane, seconded by Commissioner Zych, to adjourn the meeting at
8:35 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off -Site Secretarial, Inc.
8
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : April 17, 2002
TIME STARTED : 5:34 p.m.
TIME ENDED : 7:10 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Dahl, Carlson, Reinert
O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson (5:45)
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: Administration Director, Dan Tesch; City Engineer, Jim
Studenski; Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; City Planner, Jeff Smyser;
Finance Director, Al Rolek (part); Police Sergeant Kent Strege (part); Police Sergeant
Kurt Rausch (part); and City Clerk, Ann Blair
UPDATE ON FIVE -YEAR PLAN, AL ROLEK
Finance Director Rolek distributed a revision to the draft Five -Year Plan that takes into
consideration the scenario that there will be a levy limit for year 2003. After 2003, there
may not be any levy limits. The former version of the Plan assumed the levy limitations
would continue. He reviewed the revisions relating to the General Fund Plan Summary,
General Fund Revenue Plan, and General Fund Expenditures. He asked if any of the
Councilmembers had questions noting there will be one more work session before the
public hearing on May 13, 2002.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated that the Plan is estimating a 64.5% increase in 2006
revenues. He asked what the planned tax increase is for that same year. Finance Director
Rolek advised the tax rate would not increase. The amount of taxes raised will be higher
due to a higher tax capacity.
Finance Director Rolek advised Councilmembers to call him with any questions relating
to the Plan.
This item will be on the Council Work Session agenda Wednesday, May 6, 2002, 5:30
p.m.
REPORT ON HARDWOOD CREEK PROJECT, MARCEY WESTRICK AND
BRETT EMMONS OF EMMONS AND OLIVER RESOURCES
Ms. Westrick came forward and distributed information and a map regarding the
• Hardwood Creek. She stated the purpose of her presentation is to give an overview of
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
what the Rice Creek Watershed District has done in Hardwood Creek and also what the
District is proposing to do.
Ms. Westrick continued stating the District conducted a study because the Hardwood
Creek is a major tributary to Rice Creek and a major contributor to eutrophication of
Peltier Lake. Because there are a relatively high phosphorus and sediment loads, the
District has explored different treatment options. The District has determined the hybrid
pond/wetland system type of treatment would be best at the end of Hardwood Creek.
This option would not remove all of the pollutants and more monitoring would have to be
done upstream.
Mr. Steve Hobbs, District Administrator, stated the District wants to look at the system as
a whole and do a major restoration project. The District has applied for a grant to
complete this project. The project would also include acquiring conservation easements
along the creek. The District wants to improve water quality in the creek and hopes the
project will allow the creek to behave more naturally. He stated the District would like
the City to be a partner in this project.
Councilmember Carlson stated she is surprised that Hardwood Creek enters Peltier on the
north end of the lake. She asked if the south end of the lake will benefit from this project.
Ms. Westrick stated there are several sources of phosphorous in the lake. The creek
probably contributes up to 40% of that so improving the creek will improve the whole
lake long term.
Councilmember O'Donnell inquired about the funding source for this project.
Mr. Hobbs stated the Legislative Commission allocates money from the lottery every two
years to improve water quality in the state. The District is committed to doing the
restoration project even if the grant is not received. Other sources of funding could come
from other grants, cities and private foundations.
Councilmember Reinert inquired about what the District would ask from the City if the
City did become a partner in the project.
Mr. Hobbs stated the District would like support for the project from the City along with
any financial support that is available. Cities can also help with acquiring the easements.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if the City has any funds in the budget for this type of
project. Finance Director Rolek stated the City does have some funds available but they
are usually allocated for local surface water management projects. The City would take
this project into consideration during the planning process if a formal request was
submitted.
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
Mayor Bergeson asked if it would be helpful to have a formal letter of support from the
City to include with the grant application.
Mr. Webb stated the application has already been submitted but a letter of support from
the City would be very helpful.
Councilmember Carlson asked if the Comprehensive Plan would apply in any way to this
project. Community Development Director Grochala stated he is not sure if the
Comprehensive Plan would apply to this project. He stated there is land in the northeast
area of the City that was shown on the Plan as greenway.
Councilmember Carlson asked if the Environmental Board has reviewed the proposed
project. Community Development Director Grochala stated a presentation has not yet
been made to the Environmental Board.
Councilmember Reinert referred to the 70% phosphorous and asked exactly what that
means.
Ms. Westrick explained the percentages of phosphorous and stated it refers to the soluble
amount in the water. The soluble amount should be closer to 40 %.
Mr. Webb added the District wants the creek to behave more like a creek. The District
hopes that the restoration will help the phosphorous situation also.
Councilmember Reinert asked if the tests done prior to the recent test show the
phosphorous level at 40 %.
Ms. Westrick stated the data goes back to the mid 1970's. However, the data collected
was collected as the total phosphorous level so the District does not know the percentage
of the soluble phosphorous. Restoring the creek back to a more pre- sediment state will
help the phosphorous level.
Mr. Webb stated the restoration project is just one part of fixing the entire problem.
Mr. Webb stated that if the District can do the restoration project, the District will
continue to monitor the creek to see how this process works. Another issue is to maintain
the results over time.
Mayor Bergeson inquired about a project that was done on Howard Lake.
Manager James Leroux, Washington County, came forward and stated Howard Lake is
one of three sources of water that flows to Rice Creek. Howard Lake was identified as a
fish kilt. However, legal action was taken to stop the process and the winter took care of
the problem temporarily. The District is constantly monitoring all creeks and trying to
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
• take the appropriate action. The grant would help take care of a lot of problems but the
restoration of the creek is only one part of that.
Mayor Bergeson advised the District to work with staff to prepare a formal letter of
support for the project.
COPS MORE — FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS GRANT, SERGEANT KENT
STREGE
Officer Kent Strege advised the Council he would like to update them on the COPS
MORE grant. He stated the Department applied for the grant last year to be used for
patrol cars and software. The Department did not get the entire grant that was requested.
The Department has been asked to reapply for the grant. The City's match for the grant
would be $4,288. That amount is in the budget if the Department does receive the grant.
If the grant is received, the purchase of additional software and hardware will allow the
Department to continue its expansion into the area of making information more easily
accessible to officers while they are in their squad cars. That would allow the officers to
stay out among the public as much as possible during their shifts.
SET DATE FOR SPECIAL MEETING FOR CANVASS OF SPECIAL
ELECTION, ANN BLAIR
City Clerk Blair advised the Council they have to canvass the special election that is
scheduled on April 27, 2002. The Council has to canvass the election within one week of
the election. She asked the Council to schedule a meeting time to canvass the election
noting the meeting would be very brief.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated he will not be available the first part of the week after
the special election. He added he is very comfortable with the rest of the Council meeting
in his absence.
Mayor Bergeson stated he would prefer to canvass the election sooner than later because
of the interest in the referendum.
City Clerk Blair stated the results of the referendum can be announced before the Council
has the meeting.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule the Canvass of Special Election meeting
on Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 5:00 p.m.
UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TASK FORCE, JEFF SMYSER
AND MIKE GROCHALA
City Planner Smyser distributed information regarding the Ordinance Revision process.
The task force has been working on the subdivision ordinance. The task force has
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
approved the premature subdivision criteria (included in the General Provisions section).
General agreement has also been reached on the platting requirements, but the task force
has not voted on a completed draft of those sections. The information distributed also
included meeting dates and the topic that will be discussed. He noted the next meeting
will be on April 25, 2002.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated the Council is concerned about the completion of the
plans. He stated information needs to be provided to the Council regarding where the
task force is, where it is going, and what will be done if the task force is behind schedule.
He stated he is open to a second meeting every month to get caught up if that is necessary.
City Planner Smyser stated that he believes the task force will be caught up after the next
meeting. Many of the upcoming meetings refer to technical and legal issues. The
majority of the project will be completed in May, which complies with the proposed
schedule.
Mayor Bergeson referred to the current sign ordinance noting that he provided copies to a
resident. He stated the ordinance is long and very confusing. He suggested that some
ordinances are better off being written very simply as opposed to being too complicated.
Community Development Director Grochala stated the task force has been very good at
addressing that issue. The task force is trying to have the ordinances simply state what
the ordinance really means.
Councilmember Reinert asked how the task force is working together.
Councilmember O'Donnell stated the group works very well together.
Councilmember Carlson asked if there will be any delays with the project due to the
Comprehensive Plan approval from the Metropolitan Council.
Community Development Grochala stated he does not see any issues with the ordinances.
The Metropolitan Council may have issues with the proposed land use.
City Planner Smyser stated the task force is trying to prepare the ordinances in a way that
the Comprehensive Plan will not change them.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if the Council would like to received final drafts after
they are approved or all together as one complete package.
Councilmember Carlson stated she would like the approved sections as soon as the task
force approves them.
Mayor Bergeson stated if there are some sections that should be grouped together then
they should be distributed all at one time.
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
City Planner Smyser noted the sections that will be distributed are for review and
information only. No action will be necessary until some point in the future.
Mayor Bergeson asked how the approved sections should be distributed to the various
City Boards. Community Development Director Grochala stated he believes the
approved sections should be distributed in the same manner as it is distributed to the
Council.
CITY ENGINEER'S UPDATE ON CURRENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS,
JIM STUDENSKI
City Engineer Studenski stated he would like to keep the Council more informed on
current projects. He commented on the following projects within the City:
• Road restrictions — road restrictions were lifted on Monday.
• Lake Drive & Apollo Drive — the project is currently underway.
• Holte Pond — a confirmation letter was received and the hearing is set for May 8.
He noted he spent the day with the Holte's and have explained to them what is
going to happen.
• City Engineer Studenski stated he will continue to keep the Council informed on these
projects and other projects within the City.
•
Councilmember Carlson asked when Lake Drive will be completed. City Engineer
Studenski stated Lake Drive will be completed at the end of June or beginning of July.
The opening dates for Target have been set for July 17 (soft opening) and July 23 and 24
(scheduled opening). He stated the City is ahead of the opening schedule and Target has
been attending the meetings every Monday. Target is very aware of the construction
schedule for Lake Drive.
Councilmember Carlson inquired about the McDonalds building. Community
Development Director Grochala stated construction on the building should start either
tomorrow or next week.
REGULAR AGENDA, APRIL 22, 2002
Item 4A — Consider Resolution No. 02 — 35, Establishing Precinct Boundaries, Polling
Places and Adding Two New Precincts and Polling Places Effective September 10, 2002
— Councilmember Carlson requested a more detailed map of the boundaries that includes
the names of local streets.
Item 7A — Consider Resolution No. 02 — 34, Denying CUP, Bald Eagle Contracting —
Councilmember Carlson requested a copy of the minutes regarding this issue from the
Planning and Zoning Board meeting.
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 17, 2002
Item lAiii — VFW Proclamation — Loyalty Day, May 1, 2002, - This item was removed
from the consent agenda and moved to Item 4B under Administration Department Report.
There were no other changes to the regular agenda.
City Planner Smyser advised the City has not received a formal report regarding the
investigation of Keiger Enterprises.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
May 13, 2002.
Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
7
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : April 22, 2002
TIME STARTED : 6:33 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 7:42 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor
Bergeson
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Administration Director, Dan Tesch
(part); City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Community Development
Director, Mike Grochala; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; and City Clerk,
Ann Blair
Mayor Bergeson advised the regular Council meeting will begin for a short introduction and then the
meeting will be recessed for the Board of Review. The Council meeting will be reconvened
immediately after the Board of Review meeting
Senator Michele Bachman, District 52, Introduction — Senator Michele Bachman came forward
and stated the state has released their new plan for voting districts. Lino Lakes is now the most
westerly city in the district. She listed the cities within the new district noting the district is now very
large. The good news is that the state has been able to keep the faith with the cities, counties and
school districts. There are currently no tax cuts being considered for the cities. She stated the state is
now looking at how the deficits will be dealt with for the next two years. The state is however, in
pretty good shape financially. She added she will meet with any of the Councilmembers personally
and looks forward to working with the City of Lino Lakes. She noted she is very impressed with the
new City Hall facilities.
Mayor Bergeson thanked Senator Bachman for attending the meeting. He recessed the regular
Council meeting at 6:40 p.m. for the Board of Review meeting.
BOARD OF REVIEW
Mayor Bergeson called the Board of Review meeting to order at 6:41 p.m. He stated the County
Assessor is present to answer questions and take comments from residents.
Ms. Linda Wiener, Anoka County Assessor, came forward and stated she is the residential assessor
for the City of Lino Lakes. A commercial assessor is also present to address any concerns or
questions. She stated information packets were distributed to the Council and noted there was a
14.2% increase in residential sales within the City during 2001. The purpose of the meeting is to
review property valuations. She added that one letter was received from a resident that was not able
to be present this evening. She excused herself from the meeting to review property taxes with a
resident.
1
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
Ms. Wiener returned to the meeting and stated the County has set up an appointment with Mr. Bruce
Hansen to view his property tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. Mr. Hansen will then get notice of the County's
decision and he can attend the Board of Review at the County if he still has any concerns.
Ms. Wiener advised she received a letter from Mr. Edmund Seekno and noted she will forward a copy
of the letter to the City. Mr. Seekno indicated he does not feel his property should be valued at
$123,000 because the property is on Main Street and there is a lot of traffic. The letter also indicated
he now has a moisture problem in his basement because of the development that was done behind his
home. The County did give him a 5% reduction in his property valuation because of the moisture
problem. Mr. Seekno did obtain an appraisal that indicated the home is valued at $129,000. That
value was crossed out and the value of $115,000 — 120,000 was written in on the appraisal form. Ms.
Wiener advised she called the real estate company and they indicated the written value was what the
property owner would receive after the company took out their fee to sell the property. Ms. Wiener
stated other property valuations were taken in the area and it is possible the valued amount of
$123,000 is even too low. The County is recommending the value stay at $123,000. The Board of
Review must determine if the recommendation is approved.
Mayor Bergeson stated that unless any Councilmember has an issue with the property in question, the
valuation of $123,000 will stand.
• Ms. Wiener asked if the City has received any other letters from residents.
City Administrator Waite Smith advised the City has not received any letters from residents regarding
this issue.
Ms. Wiener asked for signatures from each of the Councilmembers and thanked them noting it was a
pleasure to work in Lino Lakes. She stated there is a lot of information available from the County and
if she can help the City in any way please contact her.
Mayor Bergeson requested Ms. Wiener distribute her business card to the Council. He asked if the
County is still on a four year cycle of reassessing properties.
Ms. Wiener indicated the County is still on a four year cycle.
Councilmember Dahl moved to close the Board of Review meeting at 6:57 p.m. Councilmember
Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Bergeson reconvened the regular Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
SETTING THE AGENDA
Item 4D, Consider Joint Resolution with Cities of Hugo and Centerville about Interchange 35E and
• CSAH 14 (Lino Lakes Resolution No. 02 — 39), was added to the agenda
2
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
• The agenda was approved as amended.
•
•
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Councilmember
Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
ITEM
DISBURSEMENTS:
April 22, 2002 (Check No. 64777 —
64906, $329,179.48)
Centennial Fire District (Check No.
13171 - 13195, $55.616.03)
OPEN MIKE
ACTION
Approved
Approved
American Cancer Society (June 21, 2002, Relay- for -Life at Centennial High), Amy Countryman
— Ms. Countryman came forward and stated this is the second season she has worked on the Relay -
for -Life event in the Centennial area. The Relay- for -Life is a community event that raised over $5
million dollars last year. She stated the event will be held on June 21, 2002, at Centennial High
School. She explained what the program is, noting the events that will be held. She also stated that
this year's event is the 5th annual event in the Centennial area.
One of the event's volunteers, Cindy, came forward and displayed the bags that were placed around
the whole track at the school last year. She stated participants set up campsite areas and cancer
survivors do the first lap around the track. She told the story relating to pennies from heaven and
challenged the Council to put together a team to participate in the event.
Another volunteer, Shelly, came forward and stated she lives in Lino Lakes and works in the
Centennial School District. She stated everyone should get involved. She indicated she lost her
father to cancer and she wants to raise money for something that has touched everyone. She stated
Relay- for -Life is a real family event and everyone can get involved. She distributed a brochure that
includes information on how to participate and how to enter a team into the event. The Centennial
High School also has team packets available.
Councilmember Carlson asked how many participants were involved in last year's event.
Ms. Countryman stated there were 350 participants last year. This year's goal is 480 participants.
The volunteers encouraged everyone who participates to spend the whole night. They thanked the
Council for their time.
3
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
No one else was present for open mike.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK
There was no Finance Department report.
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
Consider Resolution No. 02 — 35, Establishing Precinct Boundaries, Polling Places and Adding
Two New Precincts and Polling Places Effective September 10, 2002, Dan Tesch —
Administration Director Tesch advised every ten years the nation's census is done to ensure that
representation in government remains equal among citizens. After the conclusion of the 2000 census
the Minnesota Legislature adjusted the boundaries of representative government. This process is
called "redistricting ".
The Legislative and Congressional redistricting plans were released by the Minnesota Supreme Court
on Tuesday, March 19, 2002. Lino Lakes remains in the sixth congressional district, but is split by
legislative districts 52A and 53A and therefore must establish new boundaries by April 30th (at least
19 weeks before the State Primary. M.S. 204B.14 subd. 3c).
The City has redrawn its precinct boundaries, which will be in effect September 10, 2002.
Administration Director Tesch referred to a map showing the legislative split and a map showing the
new precinct boundaries with the addition of the two new precincts, because of the residential growth
in the City.
Administration Director Tesch noted the new precincts and boundaries do not apply to the special
election that will be held Saturday, April 27, 2002.
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 35, as presented. Councilmember
O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 — 35 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
VFW Proclamation — Loyalty Day, May 1, 2002 — Administration Director Tesch advised the VFW
has asked the City to proclaim Loyalty Day as May 1, 2002, as an incentive to every American to
reaffirm his or her love of the flag and country.
Mayor Bergeson read the proclamation designating Loyalty Day as May 1, 2002.
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the designation of Loyalty Day on May 1, 2002, as
presented. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Consider Resolution No. 02 — 38, Renewal of Application to Permit Gambling at Miller's on
Main for the Centennial fire Fighters Relief Fund, Dan Tesch — Administration Director Tesch
referred to a copy of the application received from the Centennial Firefighters Relief Association for
4
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
approval of their premises permit renewal for their State gambling license for their pull tab operation.
The renewal period is for two years, as per State guidelines.
Administration Director Tesch also referred to a copy of a memo from the Lino Lakes Police
Department indicating that the business and background checks have been completed and the
organization is in compliance with City Code.
Resolution No. 02 — 38 approves the application for the premises permit renewal.
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 38, as presented. Councilmember
Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 — 38 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consider Joint Resolution with Cities of Hugo and Centerville about Interchange 35E and
CSAH (Lino Lakes Resolution No. 02 — 39, Linda Waite Smith — City Administrator Waite Smith
advised the cities of Hugo, Centerville and Lino Lakes convened a joint meeting at Lino Lakes on
January 30, 2002, to discuss issues of mutual interest. One result of the meeting was agreement to
forward to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) a joint resolution regarding the
importance of improving the interchange at 35E and CSAH 14.
The City Council of Hugo adopted this resolution at its April 1, 2002, meeting and forwarded it to the
other cities for action. The joint resolution:
States the interchange is important to the three cities because of continuing residential and
commercial growth.
Notes there is a need for expansion and reconfiguration of the interchange for congestion and
safety reasons.
Urges MnDOT to accelerate, however, possible, consideration of improvements to the
interchange.
Pledges the three cities will work closely with each other and other agencies to accomplish
interchange improvements at the earliest possible time.
City Administrator Waite Smith recommended the Council adopt the resolution and authorize staff to
forward it to MnDOT.
Mayor Bergeson stated the Council informally supported the action at the joint meeting.
Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 39, as presented. Councilmember Dahl
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
• PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
5
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
Proclamation Declaring May 15, 2002 to be Peace Officers' Memorial Day and the Week of
May 15 to be "Police Week" in the City of Lino Lakes, Chief Pecchia — Chief Pecchia stated
Police Week was designed to recognize the service given by the men and women who, night and day,
selflessly stand guard in our communities to safeguard the lives and property of their fellow
Americans. On October 1, 1062, President John F. Kennedy, proclaimed May 15 of each year as
Peace Officers' Memorial Day and the calendar week of each year during which May 15 occurs as
Police Week.
Staff is requesting that Council acknowledge and read the proclamation in support of designating May
12 to May 18, 2002, as Police Week, and May 15 as Peace Officers' Memorial Day in the City of
Lino Lakes.
Chief Pecchia read the proclamation and recommended the Council approve it in support of Police
Week and Peace Officer's Memorial Day.
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve the proclamation designating May 12 to May 18, 2002,
as Police Week. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion.
Councilmember Carlson amended the motion to include the approval of May 15 as Peace Officers'
Memorial Day in the City of Lino Lakes.
• Councilmember O'Donnell and Councilmember Dahl agreed to the amendment of the motion.
•
Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Bergeson asked Chief Pecchia to convey from the Council their personal thanks to all of the
Police Officers.
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
There was no Public Services Department report.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT
Consider Resolution No. 02 — 34, Denying CUP, Bald Eagle Contracting, Jeff Smyser — City
Planner Smyser advised Dave Biese of Bald Eagle Construction has submitted an application for a
conditional use permit (CUP) for outdoor storage. He wishes to move his construction business to the
site and store vehicles outdoors, such as trucks and a construction trailer.
The current application does not include a site plan review. Typically, a CUP application such as this
would be accompanied by complete site plan information. It is staff's understanding that the
applicant wanted to find out if the outdoor storage was possible before committing to designing the
building, grading, utilities, and other elements.
6
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
Since the zoning ordinance requirements for outdoor storage is clear regarding possible locations of
outdoor storage, staff decided to process the CUP application as submitted.
City Planner Smyser presented the staff analysis of the application noting that full site and building
plans are required for CUP applications. Staff received only sparse information in the submittal.
Staff received grading, utility, and landscaping plans on April 3. This did not allow for a complete
site plan review for the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The applicant has not, in fact, applied
for a site plan review.
However, as a courtesy to the applicant, staff has reviewed the CUP without the site and building
plans. It is staff's understanding that the applicant wanted to find out if the outdoor storage was
possible before committing to designing the building, grading, utilities, and other elements. Since the
proposal clearly does not comply with outdoor storage requirements, staff is comfortable making a
recommendation on the storage CUP alone.
City Planner Smyser noted the analysis does not include a site and building plan review or
recommendation. Any such application must include complete submittal information and be
reviewed according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule.
City Planner Smyser advised staff is recommending Council deny the CUP application because it
does not comply with City requirements, as explained in the staff report.
Councilmember Carlson referred to a map of the area and asked if there has been a request for
rezoning. City Planner Smyser advised staff has not received a formal request from the landowner to
change the zoning.
Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 34, as presented. Councilmember
Carlson seconded the motion.
Mr. Greg Hayes, representative for the applicant, came forward and stated Mr. Biese thought he was
taking the prudent approach by speaking to his neighbors and providing adequate screening. He
stated he does however, understand City Planner Smyser's position. He asked the Council if they are
interested in having a class A new business in Lino Lakes.
Mayor Bergeson stated the City is always interested in new business but the City has regulations it has
to follow.
Councilmember O'Donnell asked if there are other locations within the City for this type of use. City
Planner Smyser stated there are other areas in the City zoned light industrial but it is unclear if the
configuration of the building would work in those areas.
Councilmember Carlson stated this issue is difficult to comment on. She indicated she would support
the denial because of the school and homes that are in the area and City ordinances. She stated the
request would call for a variance also.
7
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
• Mr. Hayes stated he will respect the decision the Council makes regarding this issue. However, Mr.
Biese thought he was proceeding very prudently and he is very disappointed.
Councilmember Carlson noted there was a 5 -0 vote to deny at the Planning and Zoning Board
meeting.
•
•
Mr. Hayes stated the applicant never would have paid to proceed with the CUP if he knew the City
was so adamant about this type of request. He noted he has had many discussion with the City
Planner regarding that issue.
Mayor Bergeson asked the makers of the motion if they would like to move forward with the motion
to deny the CUP.
Councilmember Reinert and Councilmember Carlson indicated they would like to move forward with
the original motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 — 34 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consider Resolution No. 02 — 36, Approving Plans and Specification and Authorizing
Advertisement for Bids for the 2002 Sealcoat Program, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski
advised that each year the City maintains its streets by sealcoating. Sealcoating places a thin layer of
oil and rock on the street to enhance the surface. Candidate streets include new streets that received
the wear course 2 -3 years ago and all other streets are done on a 5 -7 year cycle. This year,
approximately 6.5 miles of streets will be sealcoated at an estimated cost of $114,000. The 2002
budget includes $58,800 for sealcoating. It is proposed to fund the difference between the budget
amount and the final bid amount from the City's Sealcoat fund. City staff has prepared the plans and
specifications for this work and are requesting Council approval to advertise for bids.
City Engineer Studenski noted the Council will be asked to award the contract to the lowest
responsible bidder on May 28, 2002.
Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 36, as presented. Councilmember
Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 — 36 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
Consider Resolution No. 02 — 37, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing
Advertisement for Bids for the 2002 Wear Course Program, Jim Studenski — City Engineer
Studenski advised the City undertakes a paving project each year to place the final layer of
bituminous, known as the wearing course, in those developments where the majority of the lots have
been built on. The funding for this work is provided by assessments to the respective subdivision.
The subdivisions receiving wearing course this year include Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition, Trappers
Crossing 3rd Addition, and Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition.
8
•
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
The schedule for this project is as follows:
City Council Approves Plans and Specifications
City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids
Open Bids
City Council Awards Contract
Construction Begins
April 22, 2002
April 22, 2002
May 20, 2002
May 28, 2002
June, 2002
Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 37, as presented.
O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 02 — 37 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS - None
COMMUNITY CALENDAR APRIL 22 THROUGH MAY 13, 2002:
Councilmember
• Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
Special Election Day, Saturday, April 27, 2002, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Special Council Meeting to Conduct Canvass of Special Election, Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 5:00
p.m.
Spring Recycling Day, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Park Board Meeting, Monday, May 6, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
Council Work Session, Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 5:30 p.m.
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
City Council Meeting, Monday, May 13, 2002, 6:30 p.m.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Councilmember Dahl moved to adjourn at 7:42 p.m.
Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
•
9
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2002
• These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, May 13, 2002.
Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
•