Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/26/2002 Council Packet
• • AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday August 26, 2002 Council Chambers 6:30 P.M. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) August 26, 2002 (Check No. 65858 through 66002 in the amount of $810,424.12). ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 13354 through 13377 in the amount of $3,469.82). B) Consideration of Special Event Permit, 3.2 Beer License, Cabaret License for Sandburr Days C) Consideration Executing Grant Contract for New Accu -Vote System D) Consider Resolution 02 -100, Approving Application for Lino Lakes Lions to Conduct Off -Site Gambling at St. Joseph Catholic Church 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek None. 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A. Accept Resignation of Officer Jessica Halloren B. Consider Promotion of Community Service Officer Nabil Gubash to the position of Police Officer C. Consider Hiring William Owens as Part-time Community Service Officer. Page 1 AGENDA D. Consider Hiring Brad Bluml as part-time Community Service Officer. • 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia None. 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner None. 7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala • A. Consideration of Resolution No. 02- 103 Adopting 2001 Comprehensive Plan, Jeff Smyser B. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -99, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, Well No. 4 Booster Pump, Clearwater Creek, Jim Studenski (to follow on Friday; bid opening 8/22/02) C. Stoneybrook Residential Subdivision, Michael Grochala i. Consideration of Resolution No. 02-77 Allocating MUSA ii. First Reading, Ordinance No. 07 -02 Rezoning Property from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive. ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -78 Approving Preliminary Plat D. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -96 Denying Minor Subdivision and Variance, Corey and Shelly Bachman, Tanda Gretz. E. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -97, Approving Minor Subdivision, Mary Zehowski, Tanda Gretz. F. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -102, Approving Development Agreement, Clearwater Creek 5th Addition, Michael Grochala G. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -98, Closing Out Civic Complex Project, Michael Grochala 8. Unfinished Business None. 9. New Business Approval of Meeting Minutes: A) June 24, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes (already sent) B) July 8, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes (already sent) C) July 22, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes (already sent) Page 2,. • • AGENDA D) August 7, 2002 Council Work Session E) August 12, 2002 Council Meeting Minutes (to follow on Friday) 10. Community Calendar, August 27, 2002 through September 9, 2002: A) Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 6:30 p.m. B) Labor Day, City Hall Closed, Monday, September 2, 2002 C) Council Work Session, Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 5:30 p.m. D) EDAC, Thursday, September 5, 2002, 7:00 a.m. E) City Council Meeting, Monday, September 9, 2002, 6:30 p.m. NOTE: Primary Election, Tuesday, September 10, 2002 -Polls open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 11. Adjourn Revised ajb 08/20/02 1:15 p.m. Page 3 • EXPENDITURES AUGUST 26, 2002 • • Date: 08/08/2002 Time: 12:25:29 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 2610 2610 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000040 A T & T 1 41.88 41.88 .00 .00 000089 ACCENT HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000418 ANDERSON, DEB 1 62.00 62.00 .00 .00 000419 CARDINAL, CHAD & LESSARD, PATRICIA 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000421 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURER 1 19,393.00 19,393.00 .00 .00 000423 TWIN CITY FABRICATING 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000893 ADGRAPHICS 1 2,018.00 2,018.00 .00 .00 000894 FAIRVIEW CLINIC 1 5,447.00 5,447.00 .00 .00 000984 CONTRACT HARDWARE 1 3,097.00 3,097.00 .00 .00 001525 FOGERTY LLBC 2,3,4 1 19,746.00 19,746.00 .00 .00 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 004239 STREGE, KENT 1 68.16 68.16 .00 .00 004560 U S BANK 1 2,008.77 2,008.77 .00 .00 005016 PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERING 1 820.00 820.00 .00 .00 005019 NORTHERN WHOLESALE 1 21,235.00 21,235.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 16 77,936.81 77,936.81 .00 .00* • Date: 08/15/2002 Time: 10:59:35 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 2615 2615 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 176.20 176.20 .00 .00 000426 HOLTE, ETAL 1 7,400.00 7,400.00 .00 .00 000427 CONKLIN, ELIZABETH 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000429 OYOS, DANNY 1 25.50 25.50 .00 .00 000432 MARK D. OLSON, QUALITY CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 '. 500.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,073.66 1,073.66 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 299.20 299.20 .00 .00 000856 STANEK, CAROL 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 001605 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 155.00 155.00 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00 002154 KLUEGEL, PETER 1 134.62 134.62 ' .00 .00 41107 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 93.58 93.58 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 196.20 196.20 .00 .00 003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 368.00 368.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 6,871.94 6,871.94 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 17,249.87 17,249.87 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 584.33 584.33 .00 .00 005017 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER 5,6,7,8 1 9,350.04 9,350.04 .00 .00 005033 JOHNSON HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900096 ZYCH, JOSEPH 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 900271 TIMBER CREEK HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: • 22 46,574.14 46,574.14 .00 .00* Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 11:03:30 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 2619 - 2619 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Page: 1 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000017 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 3,830.45 3,830.45 .00 .00 000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 52.90 52.90 .00 .00 000089 ACCENT HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 469.28 469.28 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 1,592.40 1,592.40 .00 .00 000103 ONVOY, INC. 1 47.50 47.50 .00 .00 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 55.38 55.38 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 84.00 84.00 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 2 117.60 117.60 .00 .00 000171 ANDOVER, CITY OF 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 0410 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 146.59 146.59 .00 .00 000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD 1 151.63 151.63 .00 .00 000190 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER, INC. 1 148.90 148.90 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 25.33 25.33 .00 .00 000247 ARMORED FIRE GUN SHOP /RANGE, INC. 1 13.31 13.31 .00 .00 000264 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1 20.95 20.95 .00 .00 000302 ARRIGONI BROTHERS COMPANY, INC. 1 13,275.00 13,275.00 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 77.00 77.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 48.12 48.12 .00 .00 000349 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF 1 72.00 72.00 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 110.50 110.50 .00 .00 • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 11:03:30 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost All 000393 LACROSSE UNLIMITED 1 1,008.00 1,008.00 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 3 99.76 99.76 .00 .00 000433 BAKKE, MARIE 1 1,040.30 1,040.30 .00 .00 000434 CAFFERTY, KRISTINE 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00 000435 DPMS PANTHER ARMS 1 15.79 15.79 .00 .00 000436 EAI ENGINEERING AMERICA, INC. 2 6,365.07 6,365.07 .00 .00 000437 HAZELTON, ROX ANN 1 1,035.34 1,035.34 .00 .00 000439 HEALY -RUFF 1 224.73 224.73 .00 .00 000441 KRISTOFITZ, REBECCA 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 000443 LARSON, ANN 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000444 LAURICH, BRUCE 1 145.25 145.25 .00 .00 000446 MCDONALD, TIM 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 000448 MINNESOTA YOUTH INTERVENTION 1 198.00 198.00 .00 .00 000449 SETCOM CORPORATION 1 1,340.85 1,340.85 .00 .00 000451 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS 1 345.60 345.60 .00 .00 000471 APITZ GARAGE, INC. 1 37.80 37.80 .00 .00 0. ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. 1 15,866.00 15,866.00 .00 .00 000509 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 1 196.00 196.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 99.34 99.34 .00 .00 000542 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 1 10.89 10.89 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 52.90 52.90 .00 .00 000677 PHILIP'S TREE CARE 1 1,757.25 1,757.25 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 2 205.00 205.00 .00 .00 000776 DUFFY, MIKE 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 000843 HAGER, DALE 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 704.15 704.15 .00 .00 000947 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS, INC. 1 301.31 301.31 .00 .00' • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 11:03:31 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 569.75 569.75 .00 .00 000999 LANGER TREE SERVICE 1 750.00 750.00 .00 .00 001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. 1 289.57 289.57 .00 .00 001062 CULLIGAN, BOTTLED WATER, INC. 1 83.33 83.33 .00 .00 001109 CHEMSEARCH, INC. 1 231.88 231.88 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 68.16 68.16 .00 .00 001193 INCODE -CMS 1 1,286.31 1,286.31 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 265.20 265.20 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 541.42 541.42 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 3 5,020.25 5,020.25 .00 .00 001349 E. H. RENNER & SONS, INC. 1 46.73 46.73 .00 .00 001531 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC. 1 510,492.19 510,492.19 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 389.73 389.73 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 141.87 141.87 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 170.62 170.62 .00 .00 IlkGREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 2 366.02 366.02 .00 .00 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 701.64 701.64 .00 .00 001660 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 1 67.60 67.60 .00 .00 001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 466.55 466.55 .00 .00 002320 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 1 2,930.00 2,930.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 21.28 21.28 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 553.58 553.58 .00 .00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 187.35 187.35 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 545.17 545.17 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 56,471.80 56,471.80 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 2 1,762.02 1,762.02 .00 .00 • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 11:03:32 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: 'JAL Page: 4 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 00 00 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 326.82 326.82 .00 .00 003120 NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSOCIATION 1 215.00 215.00 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 567.45 567.45 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 307.92 307.92 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 2,343.75 2,343.75 .00 .00 003490 PETTY CASH 1 160.14 160.14 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 54.35 54.35 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES 1 764.60 764.60 .00 .00 003664 R D J SPECIALTIES, INC. 1 1,055.00 1,055.00 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 4 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 199.90 199.90 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,144.40 1,144.40 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 2,728.21 2,728.21 .00 .00 0411, TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC. 1 254.01 254.01 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 4 20,125.61 20,125.61 .00 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 743.10 743.10 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 124.00 124.00 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 294.31 294.31 .00 .00 005015 NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 006304 TSS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 281.28 281.28 .00 .00 900060 DAY - TIMERS, INC. 1 48.11 48.11 .00 .00 900223 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 1 640.00 640.00 .00 .00 900430 KORDIAK, ALBERT A. 1 1,037.00 1,037.00 .00 .00 900447 YMCA 2 12,108.06 12,108.06 .00 .00 • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 11:03:33 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 90Ii477 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. PAI 1 396.57 396.57 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 3 184.86 184.86 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 126 685,913.17 685,913.17 .00 .00* • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:10 Operator: JAL Elite.: Options: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 2611 - 2623 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 65859 65875 65861 0 65862 0 0 0 65863 65876 0 0 0 65878 079 67 0 65868 0 0 65881 65882 65883 0 0 65884 0 65887 65888 0 65891 65893 65894 65873 65896 • Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount ACCENT HOMES ACCENT HOMES AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A ANDERSON, DEB ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI ANOKA COUNTY TREASURER BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CAFFERTY, KRISTINE CARDINAL, CHAD & LESSA CONKLIN, ELIZABETH DUFFY, MIKE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HAGER, DALE INTL UNION OF OPER ENG JOHNSON HOMES, INC. KEY LAND HOMES KRISTOFITZ, REBECCA LANG BUILDERS, INC. LARSON, ANN LAURICH, BRUCE LINO LAKES BUSINESS CE MAC MAY HOMES MARK D. OLSON, QUALITY MCDONALD, TIM METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE OYOS, DANNY PERA /REGULAR PETTY CASH RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN STANEK, CAROL TIMBER CREEK HOMES, IN U S BANK ZYCH, JOSEPH REIMB BLDG ESCROW /649 HI * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7917 M * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PARCEL SEARCH TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO TOWING SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2303 T * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PARTS /SUPPLIES REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6331 C * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /502 WO * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1506 S * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE BUILDING PERMI * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE ESCROW /TIF * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /641 HI * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6398 M * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** JULY SAC /SEPTEMBER SEWER * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** LICENSE TABS * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P * * * * * * ** LIFE INSURANCE * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /7669 M * * * * * * ** EQUIPMENT /PARTS /AIRTIME * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 500.00 500.00 176.20 62.00 28.00 19,393.00 205.00 128.25 49.00 500.00 55.00 28.00 6.77 5.00 420.00 500.00 500.00 66.00 500.00 55.00 145.25 6,376.50 500.00 500.00 66.00 21,384.00 368.00 39.00 25.50 17,249.87 10.00 795.06 55.00 500.00 247.98 66.00 Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:10 Operator: JAL Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills 1111! # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept ** 72,005.38* 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, PAINT /TAPE /TIMERS / WHISTL ADULT SP 31.84 Total for Dept 202 31.84* 0 GREG LARSON SPORTS - G SUPPLIES OTHER 243.51 Total for Dept 204 243.51* 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P SPECIAL 19.64 O REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL 640.00 65892 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES SPECIAL 79.00 0 YMCA PROGRAM REC /DAY CAMP SPECIAL 340.80 Total for Dept 205 1,079.44* 0 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 117.60 O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 5.71 0 GREG LARSON SPORTS - G SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 122.51 O LACROSSE UNLIMITED PROGRAM REC YOUTH IN 1,008.00 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, PAINT /TAPE /TIMERS /WHISTL YOUTH IN 258.05 O VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTOS YOUTH IN 124.00 O YMCA PROGRAM REC /OPTIONS YOUTH IN 11,767.26 Total for Dept 207 13,403.13* 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P YOUTH SP 1.60 Total for Dept 208 1.60* 0 MAIN FLORAL LTD FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS MAYOR /C0 151.63 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE MAYOR /CO 5.77 Total for Dept 401 157.40* • 0 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINIST 84.00 O CULLIGAN, BOTTLED WATE MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST ADMINIST 83.33 0 D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST 265.20 0 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF PO REGISTRATION /2 ADMINIST 50.00 0 ONVOY, INC. WEB HOSTING ADMINIST 47.50 O PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE ADMINIST 42.20 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST 20.00 Total for Dept 402 592.23* 0 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI MAP ELECTION 38.76 0 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, VOTING SIGNS ELECTION 307.92 Total for Dept 403 346.68* 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS 4.00 Total for Dept 406 4.00* 65877 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF DUES /AL R FINANCE 155.00 O INCODE -CMS LIC FEES /SOFTWARE INSTAL FINANCE 1,286.31 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE 14.00 Total for Dept 407 1,455.31* Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:10 Operator: JAL • Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Dept Amount O NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF MEMBERSHIP ECONOMIC 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE ECONOMIC 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 0 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY PLANNING 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE PLANNING 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE PLANNING Total for Dept 416 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Communit Total for Dept 418 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65885 0 0 0 0 65891 11112 0 0 0 65871 0 0 0 65895 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, ARMORED FIRE GUN SHOP/ CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE DPMS PANTHER ARMS FOREMOST PROMOTIONS GALL'S INC. GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN HEALY -RUFF METRO SALES INCORPORAT MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF PO MINNESOTA YOUTH INTERV R D J SPECIALTIES, INC RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. SETCOM CORPORATION SHRED -IT, INC. ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVER STREGE, KENT STREICHER'S, INC. TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN XCEL ENERGY SIREN CHECKS RANGE TIME CAR WASHES SUPPLIES KEY TAGS CAMERA MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SIREN REPAIR MAINTENANCE /08 -11 -02 MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY QUERY CHARGE REGISTRATION /2 REGISTRATION SUPPLIES LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE SUPPLIES POLICE DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE TUITION /DAVE P POLICE REIMBURSE KEYBOARD POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE BIKE BOTTLES POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY POLICE Total for Dept 420 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 250.00 9.99 4.00 263.99* 20.95 20.00 8.00 48.95* 8.00 8.00* 289.20 13.31 68.16 15.79 345.60 141.87 53.93 224.73 397.00 53.80 72.00 50.00 198.00 1,055.00 104.00 505.33 1,340.85 54.95 196.00 68.16 199.90 254.01 743.10 3.14 6,447.83* 12.00 12.00* O ANDOVER, CITY OF OUTING /CARRI V BUILDING 30.00 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING BUILDING 251.66 65880 KLUEGEL, PETER REIMBURSE UNIFORM ALLOWA BUILDING 134.62 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING 14.60 O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING 1,144.40 Total for Dept 422 1,575.28* 0 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, SOD STREETS 47.45 • Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:10 Operator: JAL Check # Page: City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. OVERLAY 0 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS, PAINT 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY BATTERIES 65885 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS MODIFIED ASPHALT 65895 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY Total for Dept 430 0 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, HOSE 0 APITZ GARAGE, INC. REMOVE FREON 0 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 CHEMSEARCH, INC. BRUSH TOP 0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DIESEL FUEL 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 GOA COMPANY, INC. OIL 0 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY BEARING INSERT 0 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. WINDSHIELD #352 0 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY BATTERIES 0 LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS 0 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I BELT 0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. TORO PARTS 0 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMP TIRE REPAIR 0 NEW HOLLAND PLAN PARTS FOR MOWER 0 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. PAINT 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. PARTS Total for Dept 431 111158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65886 0 0 0 0 65889 65891 65873 A T & T ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DALCO, INC. DAY - TIMERS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN METRO SALES INCORPORAT MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI PETTY CASH PITNEY BOWES QWEST QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN U S BANK MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MAT RENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SCHEDULE SHEETS /FILLER PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY PRINTING BATTERIES ANNUAL PAY PLAN 8 -01 TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT /AU MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY REPAIR COOLING SYSTEM SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT /4 MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY LIFE INSURANCE EQUIPMENT /PARTS /AIRTIME STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 8,366.00 301.31 60.43 54.70 8.84 23.40 2,728.21 198.25 11,788.59* 52.90 37.80 575.90 231.88 5,020.25 42.65 701.64 67.60 289.57 22.70 21.28 187.35 326.82 10.89 569.75 396.57 4.60 294.31 8,854.46* 41.88 327.71 48.12 184.86 541.42 48.11 59.25 116.69 223.70 8.70 2,930.00 1,365.02 105.10 110.50 52.20 764.60 63.17 137.83 4.00 1,760.79 Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:10 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills IP# Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 65895 XCEL ENERGY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65885 65886 0 0 0 65889 65891 0 65895 0 65885 0 0 0 65891 0 MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY GOVERNME 3,630.56 Total for Dept 432 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN AMERICAN FASTENER & SU ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA NATURE CALLS, INC. PETTY CASH PHILIP'S TREE CARE QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS XCEL ENERGY BERNSTEIN, BARRY MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MRPA SOD MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY STUMP GRINDER RENTAL ANCHORS /CAPS SELECTED AREA PARTS /SUPPLIES BATTERIES PAINT /TAPE /TIMERS /WHISTL MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY PORTABLE RESTROOMS SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P WEED CONTROL MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY LIFE INSURANCE QUARTERLY BILLING /COPIER MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY Total for Dept 450 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS BOOKS RECREATI MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY RECREATI PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT RECREATI NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSO DUES RECREATI PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P RECREATI RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS QUARTERLY BILLING /COPIER RECREATI Total for Dept 451 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 461 0 PETTY CASH 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 SUPPLIES /POSTAGE /MILEAGE 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 0 0 0 0 0 65885 65886 0 • FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC PARTS /SUPPLIES BRIDGE CONN /FILTER COUPL PRINTING WATER SAMPLES BATTERIES MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY ENVIRONM SOLID SOLID SOLID 12,524.21* 2,334.79 141.57 55.38 25.33 33.00 123.29 31.40 255.28 4.42 28.56 567.45 6.35 1,757.25 107.56 22.00 70.32 104.66 5,668.61* 52.90 8.84 140.00 215.00 8.62 12.80 210.96 649.12* 1.80 1.80* WA 14.65 WA .40 WA 300.00 315.05* FORESTRY WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER 1.80 1.80* 69.53 146.59 78.22 77.00 31.40 13.26 62.54 233.27 Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13':42:10 Operator: JAL Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills C # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 65889 65891 0 65895 Description Dept Amount PETTY CASH QWEST QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, XCEL ENERGY SUPPLIES /PERMIT /PHOTOS /P WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY WATER LIFE INSURANCE WATER FLANGES WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY WATER Total for Dept 494 O AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, LIFT STATION #4 SEWER O E. H. RENNER & SONS, I OIL SEWER O EAI ENGINEERING AMERIC PUMP PARTS /LS #4 SEWER 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES SEWER 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JULY SAC /SEPTEMBER SEWER SEWER 65885 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER 0 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER 65891 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 65895 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER Total for Dept 495 0 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, SOD OTHER 0 ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. OVERLAY OTHER 0 ARRIGONI BROTHERS COMP CLEARWATER CREEK PARK OTHER O BAKKE, MARIE COMMISSIONER OTHER 0 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PREPARE /REVISE TIF REPOR OTHER 65865 FAIRVIEW CLINIC TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO OTHER 0 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTIN CONTRACTOR /LAKE DRIVE & OTHER 0 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE OTHER 0 HAZELTON, ROX ANN COMMISSIONER OTHER 65874 M HOLTE, ETAL WEBER ADDITION EMINENT D OTHER 0 KORDIAK, ALBERT A. COMMISSIONER OTHER O LANGER TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL OTHER Total for Dept 499 65866 FOGERTY LLBC 2,3,4 TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO FOGARTY Total for Dept 505 65870 PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERIN TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO PROGRESS Total for Dept 507 65860 ADGRAPHICS TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO ADGRAPHI Total for Dept 509 65869 NORTHERN WHOLESALE TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO NORTHER Total for Dept 510 65881 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CE REIMBURSE ESCROW /TIF FOGARTY Total for Dept 513 65864 CONTRACT HARDWARE TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO CONTRACT Total for Dept 514 • 23.47 36.17 53.81 9.60 20,125.61 1,799.33 22,759.80* 1,303.20 46.73 6,365.07 22.10 35,087.80 4.42 233.28 9.60 1,136.00 44,208.20* 1,448.21 7,500.00 13,275.00 1,040.30 2,343.75 5,447.00 510,492.19 2,317.58 1,035.34 7,400.00 1,037.00 750.00 554,086.37* 19,746.00 19,746.00* 820.00 820.00* 2,018.00 2,018.00* 21,235.00 21,235.00* 2,973.54 2,973.54* 3,097.00 3,097.00* Date: 08/20/2002 Time: 13:42:11 Operator: JAL • Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 65872 TWIN CITY FABRICATING TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO TWIN CIT 2,000.00 Total for Dept 517 2,000.00* Grand Total 810,424.12* • Centennial Fire District Check Register 8/21/2002 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 7/16/2002 13354 7/16/2002 13355 7/16/2002 13356 7/16/2002 13357 7/16/2002 13358 7/16/2002 13359 7/16/2002 13360 7/16/2002 13361 7/16/2002 13362 7/16/2002 13363 7/16/2002 13364 7/16/2002 13365 7/16/2002 13366 7/16/2002 13367 7/16/2002 13368 7/16/2002 13369 7/16/2002 13370 • 7/16/2002 13371 7/16/2002 13372 7/16/2002 13373 7/16/2002 13374 7/16/2002 13375 7/16/2002 13376 7/16/2002 13377 • Allina Health System ** *VOID * ** Amoco Oil Company Arthur Mohler Aspen Mills Citgo Petroleum Corporation Connexus Energy Desmond Englund International Assn. of Arson Investigators Loffler Business Systems Lynn Card Company MN Chapter IAAI /Jeff G. Schadegg Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Postmaster Qwest Reliant Energy Minnegasco Ross Industries, Inc. Xcel Energy Stacy's Specialty Stitching Arthur Mohler Mark's Meat Products Milo Bennett Viking Office Products York Photo Labs 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42180 - Office Supplies 24.00 00000 - VOID 0.00 42100 - Fuel and Lube 182.77 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 48.92 42120 - Uniform Expense 6.00 42100 - Fuel and Lube 220.26 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 355.35 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 17.95 42200 - Dues and Memberships 50.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 27.89 42180 - Office Supplies 81.30 42200 - Dues and Memberships 25.00 42270 - Breathing Air 80.00 42180 - Office Supplies 134.00 42240 - Telephone 297.85 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 114.39 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 916.28 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 558.02 45600 - Donated Items Expense 23.00 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 84.91 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 140.00 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 15.90 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 49.48 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 16.55 Total $3,469.82 • AGENDA ITEM NO. 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 26, 2002 TOPIC: Consideration of Special Event Permit, 3.2 Beer License, Cabaret License for Sandburr Days Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sandburr Days is an annual event held by the Circle -Lex Lions Club at Sunrise Park. This year's Sandburr Days will be held on September 6 -8. This annual event requires a special event permit, 3.2 beer license, and a cabaret license. The Special Event Permit has been submitted and approved by the affected departments. The application for a 3.2 beer license is complete and is accompanied by a certificate of insurance for liquor liability naming the City as additional insured. The III cabaret license application is also complete. This license is required to regulate entertainment where on -sale beer is served. All necessary fees have also been paid. The Circle -Lex Lions Club are required to have a food license from Anoka County. They are in the process of obtaining this license and it is necessary that it be posted in the area where food is sold. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt a motion approving the Special Events Application, 3.2 Beer License, and Cabaret License. Deny request. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. • 8/21/02 RD /Recreation /Sandburr Days STAFF ORIGNINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 1C Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk August 26, 2002 Accepting Voting Equipment Grant from the State of Minnesota, Secretary of State's Office VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: At the June 24, 2002 city council meeting the Lino Lakes City Council approved the request to apply for a grant to purchase optical scan ballot tabulation equipment. On August 7, 2002 the City of Lino Lakes was awarded the grant funds from the State of Minnesota. This grant will provide for half the cost of the Accu -Vote system. The City of Lino Lakes is requesting that we accept the grant funds of $2, 441.50 to purchase the voting equipment. OPTIONS: 1. Accept grant funds 2. Not accept grant funds RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGNINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk MEETING DATE: August 26, 2002 TOPIC: Consider Resolution 02 -100, Application for Lino Lakes Lions Club to Conduct Off -Site Gambling VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: The Lino Lakes Lions Club holds a license to conduct lawful gambling at the American Legion in the City of Lino Lakes. Annually the. Lino Lakes Lions Club holds a raffle off - site. This year, with the permission of the church, they have made application to conduct the off -site event at St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street. Attached is the completed application, which must be forwarded, along with a resolution to the organization. I have requested the Lino Lakes Police Department to do the investigation and they found nothing to deny the application. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Application to hold Annual Off -Site Gambling Activities. 2. Deny Application to hold Annual Off -Site Gambling Activities. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve Application to hold Annual Off -Site Gambling Activities. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02 -100 RESOLUTION APPROVING LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB REQUEST TO CONDUCT OFF -SITE GAMBLING WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute, Section 349 requires organizations to be licensed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has acquired said license, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has made application to hold their annual off - site gambling activity to be held at St. Joseph Catholic Church on September 28, 2002, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Gambling Control Board requests the City of Lino Lakes to approve or deny this application by resolution NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the off -site gambling activities of the Lino Lakes Lions Club being conducted at St. Joseph Catholic Church. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of August, 2002 ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • Minnesota Lawful Gambling LG230 Application to Conduct Annual Off -Site Gambling Page 1 of 2 3/01 No Fee Licensed Organization Information (please print all information) Organization NameI%Tw� C t_L S I..,To S License Number (5 digits)'' 'b sZ 1 License Expiration Date / 3 / / 0 7 Class of Organization License (A, B, C, or D) --� (EN Daytime Phon Name of Chief Executive Officer EraL rdA ( `2 i�-.'1.-� ktii -C( Number (7_ 4, �) 7511'U-2 '? (Do not list the gambling manager) Gambling Premises Information Name of establishment/function where gambling activity will be conducted s i S C O /-1 C ') 4c I i( Street Address and City Z:4,01 , ` LF tiG' L /4 S /37 .1 (Do not use a post office box. If no street address, write in the road designations. Example: 3 miles east of Hwy. 63 on County Road 42) Lease Requirement. Does your organization own the gambling premises? If yes, no lease is required. If no, a lease agreement must be attached (you may use lease form LG224, available from the Board). However, no lease is required if the only gambling activity to be conducted is a raffle. Date(s) for off -site activity up to 12 consecutive days: Begin date / / 3,6/ a "Z- End date Type of Gambling Activity. Check the box(es) for the gambling activity your organization will be conducting. El Pull -Tabs EJ Bingo 0 Tipboards Raffles FJ Paddlewheels Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application and provide a resolution. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge that this application will be forwarded to the appropriate city officials, the city Print name of city must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying this application, and a copy of the resolution will be forwarded to the applying organization. (Signature of city personnel receiving application) Title Date / / If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county & township must sign this application. The county must provide a resolution. For the township: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for an Print name of township annual off -site gambling activity within the township limits. 1 A township has no statutory authority to approve or (Signature of township official acknowledging application) deny an application (Minn. Stat. 349.213, subd. 2). Title Date / For the county: On behalf of the county, I acknowledge that this application will be forwarded to the appropriate Print name of county county officials, the county must pass a resolution / specifically approving or denying this application, and a (Signature of county personnel receiving application) copy of the resolution will be forwarded to the applying organization. Title Date / Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Acknowledgment and Oath I have read this application, and all information is true, accurate, and complete. I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to modify the class of organization license to be consistent with the class of permit being applied for. CEO Signature 4 Date 7/ P- / 0.)— • AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 2002 SUBJECT Officer Jessica Halloran VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND Officer Jessica Halloran has resigned her position with the Lino Lakes Police Department. Prior to being promoted to the position of officer in May of 2002, Jessica had been a Community Service Officer. OPTIONS 1. Accept Jessica's resignation • RECOMMENDATION Number One. • AGENDA ITEM 4B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 26 August 2002 SUBJECT Nabil Gubash VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND The resignation of Jessica Halloran has created a vacancy our Public Safety Department. Our recommendation is to make a tentative offer of employment as a police officer to Mr. Nabil Gubash. The appointment will be conditioned upon successful completion of a physical and psychiatric exam. Nabil has been with the city as a Community Service Officer since July of 2001. Nabil is P.O.S.T. license- eligible. OPTIONS 1. Make a conditional offer of employment to Mr. Nabil Gubash. 2. Delay the appointment. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • AGENDA ITEM 4C STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 26 August 2002 SUBJECT Offer of Employment to William Owens VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND The city has had the position of part-time Community Service Officer vacant since May of this year. We were quite pleased with the high quality of applicants we received when we advertised earlier this summer. After three sets of interviews, I would like to recommend the city council make a conditional offer of employment to Mr. William Owens. This offer would be conditioned upon his successful completion of a physical and psychiatric exam. OPTIONS 1. Make a conditional offer of employment to William Owens for the position of part-time Community Service Officer 2. Delay the appointment. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • AGENDA ITEM 4D STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 26 August 2002 SUBJECT Conditional Offer of Employment to Mr. Brad Bluml VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND The promotion of Nabil Gubash has created a vacancy for a part-time Community Service Officer. As I stated in Agenda 4C, we had a number of very qualified candidates for this position. I would therefore recommend the council make a conditional offer of employment to Mr. Brad Bluml for the position of part-time Community Service Officer. The apppointment will be conditioned upon successful completion of a physical and psychiatric exam. OPTIONS 1. Make a conditional offer of employment to Mr. Brad Bluml. 2. Delay the appointment. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • AGENDA ITEM 7 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: August 26, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution 02 -103 Approval of Comprehensive Plan, Including Revisions VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 BACKGROUND In June 2001, the City Council approved the comprehensive plan. The Council recognized that there could be revisions to the plan before it is implemented. The City Council has had numerous discussions about the plan, and agreed to some revisions. The Metropolitan Council approved the comprehensive plan on August 14. Now, the City Council must give final approval to the plan. ANALYSIS In June 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution 01 -88, which included the statements recognizing: a) that review of the comprehensive plan by the Metropolitan Council, or other information received by the City Council, may result in the need for minor revisions, and b) the potential need to revisit the Comprehensive Plan and approve any such minor revisions before the Plan is implemented As anticipated, a number of revisions have been made to the document. These were discussed at numerous work sessions. In addition, an October letter from the Met Council pointed out some corrections and updates that are necessary to the document. These include updates of bus routes and corrections to maps showing additions to regional park reserve land. The final adoption of the comprehensive plan must include the revisions and corrections, The list attached to Resolution 02 -103 as Attachment A makes it clear what changes are to be included in the approval of the document. The document will be revised in the next few weeks, including the maps. Complete, updated documents will then be available. Staff will distribute copies to the City Council. Copies will be available for sale to the public. As usual, a copy will be available in the library in City Hall. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 02 -103, approving comprehensive plan with revisions listed in Attachment A. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-103 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has prepared an updated Comprehensive Plan to guide community growth in a rational and responsible manner through 2020, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan is the result of an extensive planning process, including the work of a special citizen task force and discussion by other citizen boards, and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the Plan on October 14, 1998 and recommended approval of the Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendations and discussion offered by the citizens of Lino Lakes and has agreed on revisions, and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted numerous discussions and held an additional public hearing on June 11 and June 25, 2001, and WHEREAS, MN Statutes 462.353 authorizes the City to carry on comprehensive municipal planning activities for guiding the future development and improvement of the city and to prepare, adopt and amend a comprehensive municipal plan and implement such plan by ordinance and other official actions, and WHEREAS, MN Statutes 473.858 requires the City to prepare a comprehensive plan and submit it to the Metropolitan Council for review, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council recognized in Resolution 01 -88 that review of the Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council, or other information received by the City Council, may result in the need for minor revisions to ensure consistency with metropolitan system plans as required by law, and WHEREAS, the City Council recognized in Resolution 01 -88 the potential need to revisit the Comprehensive Plan and approve any such minor revisions before the Plan is implemented, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council completed its review of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan on August 14, 2002, and approved the plan with conditions and recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the 2001 Comprehensive Plan, with the revisions listed in Attachment A. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTACHMENT A Resolution 02 -103 List of Revisions To the 2001 Comprehensive Plan pages 75 & 77: land use maps revised: -no longer have Low/Medium or Medium/High categories Low/Medium converted to Medium Medium/High converted to High map legend will no longer list L/M or M/H categories -revise land use in two specific locations: SE corner Birch & Hodgson, reduce commercial by 10 acres, convert that 10 acres to Medium Density residential NW corner Ash St. & Hodgson, convert 20± acres of commercial to 20± acres of Mixed Use page 86: densities of land use categories revised to: Low Medium High Town Center (Mixed Use) 1 to 3 3 to 6 6 t 12 10to24 units per acre units per acre units per acre units per acre pages 13, 69, 75, 77,105, 163: maps revise maps to show additional land in regional park reserve (in vicinity of Sherman Lake and Pheasant Hills Preserve) resulting from land trade with Anoka County page 97: add solar access element The following text to be added: SOLAR ACCESS In order to protect access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems, the City will add to its official controls a requirement to consider solar access in development reviews. For example, this could be a requirement for a shadow analysis for tall structures. This would be of particular importance in commercial and industrial zoning districts. page 29, Transportation Plan: update bus route numbers and other information The following text will replace text on page 29 of the Transportation Plan: V. TRANSIT AND TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT TRANSIT Lino Lakes is currently served by four transit service providers (see Figure 12 for existing transit routes): Metro Transit -- operates Route 260, AM & PM peak express service to Minneapolis North Suburban Lines -- Route 262, AM & PM peak local/limited stop service to St. Paul via Hodgson Road and Rice Street; and Route 275, AM & PM peak express service to St. Paul via 1 -35. Anoka County Traveler -- a demand - responsive service operating to any point within Anoka County Metro Mobility -- a demand responsive service for persons who have a mobility impairment. additional updates to Transit text will be investigated in the future • • • AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 26, 2002 TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND First Reading of Ordinance 07 -02, Approving Rezoning from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive Resolution 02 -77, Approving MUSA Allocation Resolution 02 -78, Approving Preliminary Plat (Stoneybrook) 3/5 Vote — Rezoning 3/5 Vote — MUSA Allocation 3/5 Vote — Preliminary Plat Tollefson Development, Inc., has submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of Stoneybrook, a 102 lot single family residential subdivision. The request also requires approval to allocate MUSA to the site and a Rezoning from R, Rural District to R -1X, Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located adjacent to and south of Birch Street and a quarter mile west of Centerville Road. This review is based on the following revised submittals prepared by Pioneer Engineering and received by the City on June 5, 2002: Preliminary Plat, revised May 29, 2002 Existing Conditions Plan, dated January 14, 2002 Preliminary Site/Utility Plan, revised May 30, 2002 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan, revised May 30, 2002 Detail Sheet, revised May 30, 2002 And Preliminary Landscaping Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated March 7, 2002 and received by the City on March 11, 2002. Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Barr Engineering, dated August 16, 2001, and received by the City on March 27, 2002. • • • Geotechnical Report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc., dated February 28, 2002 and received by the City on March 27, 2002. Wetland Replacement Plan prepared by Barr Engineering, dated March 2002, and received by the City on March 27, 2002. ANALYSIS Project Overview Project Data: Total Site Area: Upland Area: Number of Lots: Gross Density: Net Density (Upland Only) Existing Land Use: 78.07 acres 54.73 acres 102 Single Family Residential Lots 6 Outlots 1.30 units /acre 1.86 units /acre The project consists of a 78 acre parcel that is currently in agricultural use containing approximately 19 acres of wetland. Surrounding land uses include sewered residential to the north (Pheasant Hills Preserve), unsewered large lot residential to the west and south, and a single family dwelling, pasture and wetland to the east. Land Use Plan: Zoning: The project site is currently zoned R, Rural District. Surrounding zoning includes R -1X, Single Family Executive to the north, and R, Rural to the east, west and south. Preliminary Plat: Lot Size. The minimum lot size of the R -1X District is 12,825 square feet of buildable land. All lots meet or exceed this provision. Stoneybrook Page 2 Comprehensive Plan (1990) Comprehensive Plan (2001) Site Rural Low Density Sewered Residential (Growth Area 1) North Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East Rural Low to Medium Density Residential (Growth Area 2) South Rural Low Density, Unsewered Residential West Rural Low Density, Unsewered Residential Zoning: The project site is currently zoned R, Rural District. Surrounding zoning includes R -1X, Single Family Executive to the north, and R, Rural to the east, west and south. Preliminary Plat: Lot Size. The minimum lot size of the R -1X District is 12,825 square feet of buildable land. All lots meet or exceed this provision. Stoneybrook Page 2 • • • Lot Depth. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet. Double frontage lots are required to have a minimum lot depth of 145 feet. All lots meet or exceed these provisions. Lot Width. The minimum lot width is 90 feet for standard lots and 115 feet for corner lots. All lots meet or exceed these standards. Outlots. There are six outlots included in the proposed subdivision. The outlots cover the majority of ponds and wetland areas. The applicant is proposing to dedicate all outlots to the City. The applicant should be aware that the dedication of outlots to the City will not be accepted in fulfillment of park dedication (payment in lieu) requirements. Setbacks. The required setbacks established in the R -1X District are the greater of the following: 40 feet (Collector or Arterial Street), 30 feet (Local Street), 30 feet (front yard), 30 feet (rear yard), and ten feet (side yard - principal building). The lots have adequate dimensions to meet required setbacks. In addition, pond and wetland areas will mandate a significant setback between proposed building sites and existing homes on adjacent properties. However, the building pad for Lot 2, Block 4 extends to within 18 feet of the existing wetland and proposed 100 year High Water Elevation. While the City has no requirements with regard to wetland setbacks, staff recommends that the building pad, on this lot, be modified to maximize the usable yard space. Street and Block Design. Two accesses to the site, from Birch Street, are proposed at the existing Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road intersections. Street A extends southerly into the development from Birch Street, loops back and ties into Street B. Street B is proposed to extend from Birch Street to the easterly property line of the development to provide a connection for future development to the east. There are five cul -de -sacs proposed that intersect with either Street A or B. The proposed extension of Street B easterly has been evaluated to determine its feasibility. The proposed alignment appears to allow the street to service the adjacent property with minimal potential wetland impacts. Staff is recommending that the curve radius of the street be modified to further minimize potential wetland impacts. The future extension of Street B will require the crossing of the St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) easement. SPRWS has reviewed the proposal and provided the City with the requirements that will need to be satisfied when the extension takes place. Based on their review the extension does appear to be feasible. The proposed temporary cul -de -sac should be extended easterly to abut the property line. The cul -de -sac design should be modified to extend into Lot 3, Block 2, rather than Lot 46, Block 8 due the larger upland area on Lot 3. A permanent easement will be required Stoneybrook Page 3 • • • to allow a cul -de -sac to be constructed until such time as the street is extended. Signage will be located at the street terminus indicating the future extension of the street. Street A is proposed as a large loop in the southern half of the development. While this section has two access points they form the same intersection and create a situation similar to a long cul -de -sac. Staff has evaluated other alignment options, however it appears that these would cause additional wetland impacts. Staff has reviewed this issue with the Public Safety Department and the Centennial Lakes Fire Department and determined that there are no access concerns with the proposed layout. Staff is also recommending that the applicant provide a street stub alignment to the south of the development in the approximate location of Street G. This would allow for a future connection with East Holly Drive. The 2001 Transportation Plan identifies East Holly Drive as a future Minor Collector and proposes its future connection with Holly Drive to the west and southerly to Ash Street (County J). While these projects are not planned in the near term, it would be practical to reserve the option to connect this subdivision to Holly Street in the future. It appears that an alignment option is available that would minimize impacts to existing properties to the south. It is likely that the connection would not be made until development takes place to the south. Street Width. In response to comments received by Rice Creek Watershed District the Developer is requesting a reduction in the City's standard street width to reduce impervious surface. The City currently requires a thirty -two (32) foot street width. The developer is requesting a twenty -nine (29) foot width. Section 302 of the City Code states that the City Council may permit variations from the street construction standards. Staff has evaluated the request and determined that the proposed twenty -nine foot width would be sufficient to handle local traffic needs within the development. However, it does appear that parking would need to be limited to a single side to insure emergency vehicle access. Additionally, the reduction in street width coupled with a curvilinear design of the subdivision's streets may reduce visibility of on- street pedestrian movements. Sidewalks along Street A and Street B may be necessary to alleviate this concern. The Environmental Board recommended reducing the street width. The Planning & Zoning board recommended that the street width be constructed to the city standard 32 foot width. Grading and Drainage. The City Engineer has completed review of the Grading and Drainage Plan. His comments, dated July 3, 2002, are attached. A Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Land Development Permit is also required. The City's Local Water Management Plan calls for the minimum floor elevation, including basement to be 4 feet above the groundwater, 4 feet above the normal water level, or 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation, whichever is greatest. The plan appears to satisfy these requirements based on the proposed normal and highwater levels. Stoneybrook Page 4 • • The developer is currently monitoring existing groundwater elevations for verification. Final adjustments will be made with the final grading plans. Mitigation sites are proposed to be fenced off after grading is completed to restrict construction traffic. If soils are to be brought to the site they must be consistent with existing soil types. Utilities. The City Engineer has completed review of the Utility Plans. His comments, dated July 3, 2002, are attached. Sanitary Sewer is proposed to be extended to the site from its existing location in Sherman Lake Road, north of Birch Street. Water will be provided by connection to the existing 16" trunk water main lying adjacent to the property on the south side of Birch Street. The water main is proposed to be looped back to the system by crossing Birch Street at Pheasant Hills Drive. Adequate capacity exists in the sanitary sewer system to service the proposed development. In addition, the Black Duck Lift Station, which services the area, is scheduled for replacement in 2003. Drainage and Utility Easements. Drainage and Utility easements are proposed being five feet in width and adjoining lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines and rear lot lines as required. Drainage and Utility easements covering the 100 year High Water Level and those covering underground storm sewers are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Easements should be provided to access all pond and wetland areas. Specifically, an easement should be provided for access to Outlot F and covering the emergency pond overflow on Lot 6, Block 8. Parkland Dedication. The Park Board discussed the proposed subdivision at its February 4, 2002 meeting. The board is recommending 100% cash payment in lieu of parkland dedication. As explained in the Public Services Director's February 5, 2002 memo (attached) the proposed development lies outside the planning limits of the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. The Park Board looked at several alternatives and recommended the payment in lieu as the preferred option. Floodplain. Portions of the site lie within a Flood Plain Zone A. Zone A represents areas of 100 year flood where base flood elevations have not been determined. The City's Floodplain Management Ordinance requires that all principal structures be located no lower than one foot above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The submitted grading plan identifies proposed 100 year High Water Level elevations. The Rice Creek Watershed District's 1998 Calibration Study identifies the regulatory flood elevation for this area as 887.6. As currently proposed, all lot pads are located entirely above this elevation and all first floor elevations satisfy the flood plain requirements. The proposal is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Rice Creek • Watershed District. If the proposed subdivision is approved, the Developer will be Stoneybrook Page 5 • • • required to make application to FEMA for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to revise the existing Flood Plain maps consistent with the proposed grading. Wetlands. The project site contains 19.39 acres of wetland. 2.06 acres of wetland are proposed to be impacted by the site development. The wetland mitigation will take place on -site, by creating two new wetlands and three water quality ponds, which will have a total area of 2.51 acres and 3.27 acres, respectively. A portion (.20 acres) of one of the existing wetland areas will be converted from Type 2 wet meadow to a Type 3 shallow marsh wetland to help facilitate site drainage. The developer is proposing to install signs, delineating the wetland edge, at property corners or where the wetland edge changes drastically within a lot. Approximately 35 to 40 signs will be installed (one sign per two homes) along the wetland edge. The signs will designate the area as a protected wetland zone. The sign will also inform homeowners that moving or cutting beyond the sign is not allowed. The plans also delineate a wetland buffer easement adjacent to wetland to provide additional transition from cultured lawns to native vegetation. The developer is proposing the establishment of a Homeowner's Association to maintain all buffer areas and applicable signage. The developer should also make available to all lot purchasers a Best Management Practices/Environmental information brochure identifying purpose of buffer areas, soil and water conditions in infiltration areas, as well as limitations on use of buffer and wetland areas. The application also includes a Monitoring Plan that provides for monitoring of the newly created wetlands for a 5- year period. The report will be submitted to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) on a yearly basis. The RCWD is the Regulatory Government Unit (RGU) for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. Security should be required within the development agreement to insure installation of signs as well as the required monitoring. This requirement will need to be coordinated with the RCWD. All exposed soils above the Normal Water Level should be seeded with mixes consistent with City of Lino Lakes seed mixtures. The applicant should coordinate seed types with the City's Environmental Specialist. Tree Preservation. The site contains a number of Oaks in the extreme southeast corner, along the westerly property line and one on the north side adjacent to Birch Street. There is no anticipated tree loss as part of this project. The grading plan identifies the installation of fencing along the drip line of the trees. Installation of tree preservation measures will be required before grading activity on the site. The developer should coordinate all tree preservation activities with the City's Environmental Specialist. Stoneybrook Page 6 • CEPTED. Officer Mike Rumpsa prepared a review on January 21, 2002 (attached). He expressed concern with the additional traffic load on Birch Street, particularly with morning rush hour traffic. Landscaping. A landscaping plan for screening along Birch Street has been submitted as required. The plan consists of a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees. The City's Environmental Specialist is recommending replacement of the proposed Colorado Spruce with the White Spruce. The developer is also proposing to add an additional coniferous tree buffer along the northeasterly and westerly property lines in response to adjacent property owner concerns. Wildlife Impacts. The recently completed Wild Land Urban Interface study included a wild life assessment of the City of Lino Lakes. Results of this study indicate that there are no significant wildlife issues identified on the Stoneybrook site. Sandhill Cranes have been sighted in a large wetland complex southeast of the development property. The upland area in the southeast corner of the site will act as a buffer to potential Sandhill Crane nesting in this area. Phasing. The applicant is proposing to phase the development over two years. 52 lots are proposed for development in 2002. The remaining 50 lots would be developed in 2003. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The proposed subdivision does not surpass the mandatory thresholds for an EAW and therefore is not required. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The developer has made application to the RCWD for approval of a Land Development Plan and a Wetland Alteration Plan. The RCWD has approved a TWAFAA (Table with Authorization for Administrative Action) for the proposed development. Anoka County. The County has completed its review of the proposed development. The County will require improvements to Birch Street (CSAH 10) so that there will be left, through and right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound CSAH 10 traffic at both the Sherman Lake Road and Pheasant Hills Drive intersections. The developer will be required to make these improvements as part of this development. MUSA Allocation: The applicant is requesting the allocation of approximately 54.73 acres of MUSA to service the proposed development. In 1996, the Metropolitan Council provided the City of Lino Lakes with a 150 acre "MUSA Reserve ". The reserve was intended to accommodate some limited development within specified areas of the City until the updated Comprehensive Plan, including the transportation element, was completed. There are approximately 15.7 acres remaining in the City's MUSA Reserve. Stoneybrook Page 7 • • • On August 14`h the Metropolitan Council approved the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan. As part of the plan, the City requested an additional 359 acres of MUSA to service future development through 2010. As such the proposed residential development is eligible for the MUSA Allocation of 54.73 acres based on the following findings: 1. The application for 54.73 acres of MUSA is being made in conjunction with the request for preliminary plat approval. 2. The applicant has requested an R -1X zoning designation be applied to the proposed development consistent with the proposed land use contained in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. Such request has been made in conjunction with the preliminary plat request. 3. The property lies immediately south of Pheasant Hills Preserve, which is within the existing MUSA. The property lies within a Stage 1 growth area as defined in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. 4. Development of the property is considered a natural utility extension. Existing utilities are located immediately to the north of the site. 5. Development of the property is considered a natural extension of existing roadways. Proposed roadways into the site will connect with the existing Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road. 6. Development of the property is environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed development has minimized impacts to existing wetlands and tree cover on the site. Approximately 21.44 acres of the 78.07 acre site (27 %) will remain undeveloped. 7. The proposed development lies outside the scope of the City's 1992 Park and Trail Plan. The City's Park Board has evaluated the proposed development and recommended a 100% cash park dedication. 8. The Development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan. 9. Development of the property shall not adversely affect the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. 10. Birch Street (CSAH 10) is adequate to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development subject to the improvements specified by Anoka County. The developer will be responsible for the necessary upgrades to CSAH 10. 11. The project is proposed to be phased over two years. The phasing plan calls for 52 lots in 2002 and 50 lots in 2003. Stoneybrook Page 8 • • Rezoning: As previously indicated, the applicant has requested the rezoning of the subject property from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive. In consideration of rezonings, the Planning and Zoning Board must consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment based on the following criteria: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed R -1X zoning is consistent with the Low Density Sewered Residential Land Use designation for the property. The Comprehensive Plan was approved by Metropolitan Council on August 14, 2002. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Comment: The proposed R -1X single family residential zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses of the area. The proposed gross development density of 1.30 units per acre provides for a suitable transition from surrounding large lot residential developments. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. Comment: The proposed residential subdivision is in conformance with all applicable performance standards. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed use can be accommodated by existing public services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The proposed use will require the installation of left and right turn lanes on Birch Street (CSAH 10) at Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road. The developer will be responsible for making these improvements. Environmental Board. The City's Environmental Board reviewed the request on March 27, 2002 and June 26, • 2002 and recommended denial of the request due to excessive wet characteristics of the Stoneybrook Page 9 • • site, and incomplete information needed to process the plat. Note: All information required has been submitted by the developer. They also submitted recommendations to consider if the proposal is approved. These comments are attached and, where applicable, have been incorporated in this report. Planning and Zoning Board The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing and reviewed the proposal at its July 10, 2002 regular meeting. The Board recommended approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat with the conditions included in the staff recommendation. The Board also recommended approval of the MUSA allocation with the following conditions: a. Allocation of MUSA shall be subject to the approval of the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. b. That the City demonstrates the need, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, for the growth population numbers of 3.47 people per home, including the census data of homes built from 2000 to current, as well as what's included in already approved homes for the lot inventory. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings contained in this report and subject to the conditions listed below, staff recommends the following: A. Approval of the MUSA Allocation subject to the following conditions: 1. The development shall be accordance with the approved phasing plan consisting of 52 lots in 2002 and the remaining lots in 2003. B. Approval of the Rezoning from R, Rural District to R -1X, Single Family Executive District subject to the following conditions: 1. The Rezoning shall not be effective until 30 days following publication of the ordinance. C. Approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The MUSA Allocation and Rezoning are approved. 2. A revised preliminary plat shall be submitted containing the following modifications: a. The alignment of Street B shall be modified to reduce potential • wetland impacts from its easterly extension, subject to staff review. Stoneybrook Page 10 • • • b. The proposed Street B cul -de -sac shall be extended to the easterly property line and modified to reduce the impact on Lot 46, Block 8. c. Street G shall be modified to extend to the southerly property line of the proposed subdivision for future extension. d. Easements shall be provided for access to Outlot F and to cover the emergency pond overflow on Lot 6, Block 8. 3. Soils imported to the site, if any, shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 4. The developer shall provide a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. 5. The developer shall provide the City with a Homeowner's Association agreement including an operation and maintenance agreement for the wetland signage and buffer areas. 6. Developer shall prepare a Best Management Practices/Environmental Information brochure with regard to buffer and wetland area requirements. 7. The developer shall submit a revised landscaping plan showing proposed landscaping on northeasterly and westerly property lines. 8. The developer shall provide a Warranty Deed or otherwise dedicate the Outlots to the City of Lino Lakes. The conveyance of outlots shall not constitute satisfaction of the park dedication requirements. 9. The developer shall provide conservation easements covering all proposed wetland buffer areas. 10. The developer shall provide dedicated right -of -way or permanent easements covering all proposed temporary cul -de -sacs. 11. The Developer shall provide signage identifying wetlands and wetland buffer areas. 12. The Developer shall install signage at the end of temporary cul -de -sacs indicating the future extension of such streets. 13. A phasing plan shall be implemented. Phase 1 development shall be limited to fifty -two (52) lots in 2002. Phase II development will consist of the remaining lots in 2003. Nothing herein shall prevent the grading of the entire site in one phase. 14. All modifications as required by the City Engineer shall be satisfied. 15. All required improvements of Birch Street (CSAH 10), as set forth by Anoka County, shall be the responsibility of the developer. 16. All federal, state, county, and watershed district permits shall be obtained prior to commencement of site improvements. 17. The developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City prior to commencement of site improvements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 02 -77, MUSA Allocation 2. Ordinance No. 07 -02, Rezoning 3. Resolution No. 02 -78, Preliminary Plat Stoneybrook Page 11 • 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Utility Plan 6. Grading Plan 7. Landscape Plan 8. Phasing Plan 9. Alternate Street G Layout 10. Park Board Memorandum 11. CEPTED Review Letter 12. Environmental Board Memorandum 13. City Engineer's Review 14. Anoka County Review 15. St. Paul Regional Water Services Stoneybrook Page 12 • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-77 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF 54.73 ACRES OF MUSA TO THE STONEYBROOK DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City has received an application for the allocation of MUSA to service the proposed Stoneybrook residential subdivision, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on July 10, 2002, and WHEREAS, The proposed residential development is eligible for the MUSA Allocation of 54.73 acres based on the following findings: 1. The application for 54.73 acres of MUSA is being made in conjunction with the request for preliminary plat approval. 2. The applicant has requested an R -1X zoning designation be applied to the proposed development consistent with the proposed land use contained in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. Such request has been made in conjunction with the preliminary plat request. 3. The property lies immediately south of Pheasant Hills Preserve, which is within the existing MUSA. The property lies within a Stage 1 growth area as defined in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. 4. Development of the property is considered a natural utility extension. Existing utilities are located immediately to the north of the site. 5. Development of the property is considered a natural extension of existing roadways. Proposed roadways into the site will connect with the existing Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road. 6. Development of the property is environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed development has minimized impacts to existing wetlands and tree cover on the site. Approximately 21.44 acres of the 78.07 acre site (27 %) will remain undeveloped. 7. The proposed development lies outside the scope of the City's 1992 Park and Trail Plan. The City's Park Board has evaluated the proposed development and recommended a 100% cash park dedication. 8. The Development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan. S general 9. Development of the property shall not adversely affect the health, welfare, and safety of the community. 10. Birch Street (CSAH 10) is adequate to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development subject to the improvements specified by Anoka County. The developer will be responsible for the necessary upgrades to CSAH 10. 11. The project is proposed to be phased over two years. The phasing plan calls for 52 lots in 2002 and 50 lots in 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota hereby approves the allocation of 54.73 acres of MUSA to service the proposed Stoneybrook residential development subject to the following condition: 1. The development shall be accordance with the approved phasing plan consisting of 52 lots in 2002 and the remaining lots in 2003. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of August, 2002. ATTEST: III Ann Blair, City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 07-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R RURAL TO R -1X SINGLE FAMILY EXECUTIVE The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the 2001 City Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site for low density sewered residential uses in a Stage 1 growth area. 2. The proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for low density sewered residential uses. Land north and west of the site is already developed with single family homes. The proposed gross development density of 1.30 units per acre provides for a suitable transition from surrounding large lot residential developments to the west and south. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The accompanying plat proposal meets the zoning and subdivision requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with the extension of existing public services and will not overburden the City' s service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property, in conjunction with required road improvements to Birch Street (CSAH 10). The developer will be responsible for making these improvements. Section 2. 10, 2002. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on July Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to R -1X, Single Family Executive, the following described real estate: • The East Half (1/2) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4), Section 27, Township 31, Range 22, except the East 1 1 rods thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Anoka County, Minnesota. Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. Upon its passage, this ordinance shall be in force and effect 30 days following its publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of September, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-78 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR STONEYBROOK WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for Stoneybrook, and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on July 10, 2002, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 07 -02 rezones the subject property to R -1X Single Family Executive, and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 02 -77 allocates 54.73 acres of MUSA to the proposed plat, and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for Stoneybrook as depicted by the preliminary plat by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 29, 2002 and received by the City of Lino Lakes June 5, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The MUSA Allocation and Rezoning are approved. 2. A revised preliminary plat shall be submitted containing the following modifications: a. The alignment of Street B shall be modified to reduce potential wetland impacts from its easterly extension, subject to staff review. b. The proposed Street B cul -de -sac shall be extended to the easterly property line and modified to reduce the impact on Lot 46, Block 8. c. Street G shall be modified to extend to the southerly property line of the proposed subdivision for future extension. d. Easements shall be provided for access to Outlot F and to cover the emergency pond overflow on Lot 6, Block 8. 3. Soils imported to the site, if any, shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 4. The developer shall provide a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. • • • 5. The developer shall provide the City with a Homeowner's Association agreement including an operation and maintenance agreement for the wetland signage and buffer areas. 6. Developer shall prepare a Best Management Practices/Environmental Information brochure with regard to buffer and wetland area requirements. 7. The developer shall submit a revised landscaping plan showing proposed landscaping on northeasterly and westerly property lines. 8. The developer shall provide a Warranty Deed or otherwise dedicate the Outlots to the City of Lino Lakes. The conveyance of outlots shall not constitute satisfaction of the park dedication requirements. 9. The developer shall provide conservation easements covering all proposed wetland buffer areas. 10. The developer shall provide dedicated right -of -way or permanent easements covering all proposed temporary cul -de -sacs. 11. The Developer shall provide signage identifying wetlands and wetland buffer areas. 12. The Developer shall install signage at the end of temporary cul -de -sacs indicating the future extension of such streets. 13. A phasing plan shall be implemented. Phase 1 development shall be limited to fifty -two (52) lots in 2002. Phase II development will consist of the remaining lots in 2003. Nothing herein shall prevent the grading of the entire site in one phase. 14. All modifications as required by the City Engineer shall be satisfied. 15. All required improvements of Birch Street (CSAH 10), as set forth by Anoka County, shall be the responsibility of the developer. 16. All federal, state, county, and watershed district permits shall be obtained prior to commencement of site improvements. 17. The developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City prior to commencement of site improvements. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of August, 2002 ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor r 11 1.4Lj r--r 1 • 4 , ,-121.26 8...1 so SC 1/4 a/ in. 27 BIROF STREET 1 1 1 --4 --I I-- -7;4 I 11 I mr3r —7-1 —K= L cm/K . yr:Atir 1 1 J. r is ' V ry11'U 1..dd E ql 81 _.501 Av 1 "C 0 ELle gggii AAisti P0:4PPP4atde m m m 1282.17 tieraf3trE ot the 1/4.18.4.27 2. MAO • • w • • • t. J 7 Forlimiteparglimainilmu. :-..E.117.H.H.-1!..:HEE1111111.741 IHEL".11t1".:El"---,t14111111211 EALEII:1±-:-.±1:Ef."±:111111E: E167Alti.UHEliLtnr1H1±3 1-11 -lIIII ' ;;; II iiliilliiililiulluiuuiiiliilui It i=2 rn7:4:11 , - -e•-1:1:1r. Mi !Mt !Mr ; MM! ;;;;; ' 1-E.- 1-- ... ..1.21n!ITID212LI.MILIE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII:11 eCrl 111111 Ime-tx. I- I LEI I a I, Elr—ti. DM- I ELI El - rf-EECELLI r CE LCFI El--E=-"ELEI I —I- "E-r r EL` le 111121 prmr r ir.t:" gr'itr'^ ImilimpummilmemspommillIPINIREN ImiarliMmils;6116116milmilloui 1 IZEE:17.1KEHEEZEICZE ILIC:1:::1::c.71C71[:11:11,72t IiHIiuiIiiiIiiiiflhiiiIIiIiii 1-471-7F-TECECTIT-11 • •:. 1:717-1717,7771-172r ,1.66. mmHg LtInL-1,±1-E t,FEE[!. I"' I"P"17 I "Et Cr t.tri-7-zI ... --- 1 1 II ---- I----- Ill 1-- Ita 1 ---v--' 1 / ) " F .141 --1,- r 1 -)-414147. Lgl t Rii , ____1 In igks, r 1_1AI =AN 10 .1 • it 11 1' -4 a • Ire r3 111 • \ riri 1 1 1 1-7-1 t • WM/ WINO MOP • / BIRCH S11 10 010 DKR ww $ - -- ` cate. 3 ��-- -908 -- ®4 J Y rl 1 1 1 1 oil Ir d SSMil ONri tip - 1 • • • 4,4v * lil 4 • sa vi 0N1-1 AO AJ.ia tl: 1 Y6 5PpR �i , 9 9 s E n g • r it 1 s i 11 ..1�.........0. Y , No, 0 6-44 I, HOO2l843NO.S 2 z n 1p 7 + � 0 tiski%\ krigl „et, \ Y?: 1 $i +•. E` rto F,,, es A ;e ° 1 i i I • • • • • - Mes sot ***if* • ICI gti tit 1 3 Yr rrI 4 Pig ri! NCO BA3NOIS �f. g m 0 rn P� -� / / /� / / / / i2 / / / / ,---- / / / % i • r 9, :1 4; i-----' r I / ) 1 9 N /. / I 1 @. . \� % ! 11 11 '21a STIIN INVSV3Hd 133a1S H3aI8 '�-- tea• ---�" filth 1-$4 ft elf 161011'14 II Iwo 01 4no ;rJ 1; f =T 11 s sus---- • - - - -- --- - -`._. _= J —� 1 ( 1I dd J cn 0 N rook - Lino Lake cu C 0 CI) • N 0 ase 2 2003) - 51 ase 1 2002 * PIONEER * engineering LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681 -1914 FAX:681 -9488 LAND PLANNERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine. MN 55434 (763) 783 -1880 FAX:783 -1883 PRELIMINARY PLAT ALTERNATE LAYOUT OF STONEYBROOK 24 26,448 sq.ft. (17,339 sq.ft.) R.3pp�� STREET c 11 90 19 16,806 sq.ft. 20621 201132 138 20 25,580 sq.ft. 64 97 105 23 33,495 sq.ft. (22,659 sq.ft.) 148 91 91 0 12 91 104 21 19,895 sq.ft. 148 22 16,252 sq.ft. 109 Scale: inch _ 5 Ofeet Lino Lakes Public Services Department 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 982 -2440 Fax (651) 982 -2439 February 5, 2002 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner FROM: Rick DeGardne ,`1'ublic Services Director SUBJECT: Park Board Comments on Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat After discussing several alternatives, the Park Board is recommending 100 percent cash dedication for the proposed Stoneybrook Development. The Park Board looked at several alternatives including: 1. Acquire land for a park along the eastern edge of the development. This may be able to be connected to additional parkland that is acquired as the property to the east is developed. However it appears the St. Paul Water Utility Easement would make this difficult. Also, it is our understanding that substantial wetlands are located to the east of the Stoneybrook Plat. 2. Acquire two lots to provide a small park area for playground equipment. However, the Park Board didn't want to simply acquire, "less than one -acre park areas," as each development is created. 3. Designate the recreation complex as the park to service the residents in.the Stoneybrook D evelopment. The recreation complex will provide some leisure opportunities for informal play such as playground e q ui ment basketball and tennis. However, the recreation compek will be used very intensely by all residents. If the upcoming referendum is unsuccessful, the recreation complex will most likely not be developed. When the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan was developed, the Stoneybrook property was located outside the anticipated urban development limits. Therefore, the Park Board has not had an opportunity to analyze the parks and trails needs for this area of the city. Without the ability to look at "big picture" it is difficult to determine how this 78 -acre development will fit within the city's overall, long -range parks and trails plan. Therefore the Park Board is recommending 100 percent cash dedication. If the Community Development Department anticipates additional development outside of the anticipated urban development limits (as indicated in the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan) perhaps we should consider updating the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan to address the need for additional parks and trails. swlricklPark Board Comments on Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat Memo to Smyser.doc Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director /Chief of Police Officer Mike Rumpsa Lino Lakes Police Department 01/21/02 CPTED Reviews I have reviewed the plans for the Behm Century farm edition, Stoneybrook edition, TCF bank, and the Marketplace 2nd Addition. I have several comments. Behm Century Farms Edition: — - – •- - - - - -- -- - ..____.__- ...... • The street names are going to be confusing. For instance: At the present time, we already have a Pony Ct that intersects Mustang Lane. • I see from the plans, A Pony Lane and Pony Ct are planned to gain access to Sunset Ave. • This is going to cause confusion for Police, Fire and Ambulance. ▪ I have noticed that Pinto Lane has several small cul -de -sacs. Each of these cul- de -sacs has a different name. I suggest, if possible, to eliminated Pinto Court and have those houses keep the Pinto Lane Street name. It appears to me that the lot's south of Pinto Cove will not be buildable lots, and this will lessen the clutter of street names we have for this development. • The new "Mustang" Street names are going to cause confusion because Mustang Ct and Mustang Lane have already been used for street names south of Palomino Lane. .. _ .... , . . • The Mustang Lane, Avenue, Cove, Circle and Mustang Way should be renamed to eliminate any chance of confusion for emergency personnel. • I understand that the land developer wants to maximize his/her land usage, but by looking at the layout of the streets and the names that were assigned to roads, I see utter confusion for emergency personnel. G> Stoneybrook Edition: • At the present time, the only concern that 1 have for the development, is the traffic load that it will pose to Birch St for morning rush hour. • Much of the traffic heads east on Birch Street to Centerville Rd then south to I35E. • • • I would recommend a semaphore at the intersection of Birch St and Centerville Rd to help manage the congestion problem. 640 Town Center Parkway • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1182 D�thlir Arlminietratinn/Rnrnrdv F,S1- g17_'nf fl • tav• AS1_Qfl7_7igq Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director / Chief of Police • The semaphore would provide a break in the Westbound traffic to allow motorists attempting to gain access from Sherman Lake Rd to Birch St a chance to merge • into the traffic lane. TCF Bank: • I have no comments on TCF at this time. The lighting and landscaping look fine. .. - • M a r k e t Place 2nd Addition: -.. - - -. • - - — - - -- - - ___._ ___ _ . -.._ - -..._. • I am not able to comment on this due to the lack of information on the preliminary plat that I received. 640 Town Center Parkway • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1182 U..l.l:.. A /[)...- ....J... cc/ non nnnn - r_.._ miry non n.nn • Memo To: Michael Grochalla From: Marty Asleson Date: June 27, 2002 Re: Recommendations of the June 26 Environmental Board /Stoneybrook Environmental Board Meeting Date: June 26, 2002 Topic: Stoneybrook Development/Preliminary Plat Recommendations: The Environmental Board made a recommendation that the Preliminary Plat be denied because of excessive wet characteristics of the site, and incomplete information needed to process the Plat. The following comments were made: • The site is excessively wet. • Ordinary high water elevations not determined for lots 23 -27 adjacent to wetlands 12 and 13. • The Environmental Board showed concern that there is not sufficient MUSA available, and that the Comprehensive Plan is not finished yet. • There has not been a response to the request of the March 27th Environmental Board for 17 acres of open space. • There has not been a response to the request of the March 27th Environmental Board asking that street lighting be downward focussed low intensity and of no spill nature. • If plat is to go forward, than: • Reduce Road widths to 29 feet from 32 feet. Recommendation is based on the Center for Watershed Protection's Better Site Design Handbook. Attachment 2. • Page 1 • • Additional oak trees should be placed in the SE corner of the Plat. See attachment 1. • The buffer areas around the wetland/pond areas should be increased to 10 to 20 feet minimum. • A more detailed description of the Tree Preservation Plan should be submitted indicating that protection fence will be installed before any soil disturbance occurs. • An agreement has been reached concerning site soils budget, and that no soils will be exported or imported to the site without discussion and approvals from City Staff. • That an environmental information and disclosure brochure be given to new prospective lot buyers describing the soil and water in the area, that there may be soft and wet conditions in back yards, and that buffers have been established around all wetlands and ponds, and that this means no- mowing, dumping, or changing vegetation (without approvals from the City), and that all buffer areas will be signed as such. • That the City does not loose sight of the Waterworks easement as a part of a Citywide Greenway System. Motion to Deny made by Donlin second by O'Connell. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 2 • • • Memorandum DATE: July 3, 2002 TO: Mike Grochala Q FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer . -3 RE: Stoneybrook Subdivision A preliminary review of the resubmitted documents has been performed. The submittal included an eight -page revised drawing set dated June 3, 2002, item by item response letter to city comments plus exhibits dated May 29, 2002, supplemental letter dated May 31, 2002, and revised fire flow documentation dated June 10, 2002, for the proposed Stoneybrook Subdivision has been performed. The design generally meets City requirements. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this subdivision: Watermain: Watermain lines are to be Class 52 ductile iron pipes in final specifications. The City of St. Paul requirements for crossing the aqueduct must be submitted. Confirmation of adequate water system supply is under review. City will confirm size of watermain extension to the west boundary at Birch Street. Utilities shall be extended to the project's south boundary in Street G. The submittal meets all remaining design standards required by the City of Lino Lakes. Upon receiving the plans and specifications for the project, the specific details of materials, construction standards, and testing requirements will be reviewed. Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer crossings of the watermain are to show at least 18 inches of vertical separation in final plans. As defined in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (Sewer Element), this project is in Sewer District 1 and 5. Sewer District 1 will service this subdivision and will provide adequate capacity for the project. The existing sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to handle the new subdivision. The lift station at Black Duck Drive is scheduled for upgrading which will further increase and improve the ability to service the area. Utilities shall be extended to the project's south boundary in Street G. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • • Stoneybrook Memorandum Dated July 3, 2002 Page 2 . The submittal meets all remaining design standards required by the City of Lino Lakes. Upon receiving the plans and specifications for the project, the specific details of materials, construction standards, and testing requirements will be reviewed. Street Standards: We recommend providing right -of -way for future connections of the street and utilities to the south of the subdivision at the location of Street G. Dimensions and easements must be provided for the cul -de -sac on Street B. Areas below the 30 -mph design_ criteria will require appropriate signage on final plans. The two street access points onto CSAH 10 (Birch Street) is currently under review by Anoka County. The 2001 City of Lino Lakes Transportation Plan Shows Birch Street as a Major Collector roadway. The submittal meets all remaining design standards required by the City of Lino Lakes. Upon receiving the plans and specifications for the project, the specific details of materials, construction standards, and testing requirements will be reviewed. Storm Sewer: Attached is a memorandum dated July 3, 2002, which addresses the storm sewer design. The submittal meets all remaining design standards required by the City of Lino Lakes. As stated in the memorandum, approval is required from RCWD. Upon receiving the plans and specifications for the project, the specific details of materials, construction standards, and testing requirements will be reviewed. Grading Standards: General design meets requirements by the City of Lino Lakes. Further review will be required upon addressing issues as outlined in the storm sewer review. Documentation of material entering and leaving the site will be necessary prior to approval of the plans. Minimum ditch grades of 2% will be required. Recommendation: The design generally meets City requirements. Upon completion of the above issues, final approval can be given for the proposed Stoneybrook subdivision. • TKDA • • TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 6511292 -4400 FAX: 651/292-0083 Jim Studenski Reference: Drainage Review Copies To: for Stoneybrook From: Stephen W. Hartley City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date: July 3, 2002 Commission No. 12475 -002 The following documents, submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, were used to review the Stoneybrook site plan: TKDA Drainage Review memo dated April 9, 2002 Pioneer Engineering response letter dated May 29, 2002 Plan Set dated January 14, 2002, and revised May 30, 2002 HydroCAD Model dated March 6, 2002 After reviewing the above documents, I have the following comments. New comments are shown in bold: 1. Final construction plans will need to be designed to City Standards. City Standard Details for storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterntain will need to be shown in the plans. Response letter stated final construction plans will meet City Standards. 2. The detail for the outlet control structure calls for a treated lumber weir. The weir will need to be concrete. The detail for the weir now shows the weir as concrete. An Equal Opportunity Employer Drainage Review Page 2 July 3, 2002 for Stoneybrook 3. The City's design standards for storm sewer are the following: Minimum Full Velocity — 3 fps Minimum Mainline Storm Sewer Size —15" RC pipe Minimum Culvert Size —15" RC pipe The submitted design seemed to use a minimum full velocity of 2.5 fps and minimum pipe size of 12" RC pipe. The storm sewer chart included: in the new plan set reflects the above requirements. 4. The City's Local Water Management Plan calls for ponds to be built with a 15 foot, 10:1 side slope bench. The pond detail submitted show a 10 foot, 10:1 side slope bench. This detail need to be corrected and the proposed pond adjusted to a 15 foot wide bench. The pond detail has been revised to show a 15 -foot, 10:1 side slope bench. 5. The supporting information, soil types, and land use, used to determine the curve numbers needs to be submitted. Supporting information was included in the response letter. 6. An SCS TR -55 method should be used to determine the Time of Concentrations, not the Lag method. Response letter reiterates the Time of Concentration from the HydroCAD Model, which was a Lag method computation. An SCS TR -55 method is the preferred method to calculate Time of Concentrations. 7. Pond 6 is landlocked, according to the model. The 100 -year flood elevation for the pond will need to be determined allowing for a 100 -year snowmelt, 10 -day runoff of 7.2 inches and a Curve Number of 100. The flood elevation has been revised to reflect a 100 -year, l0 -day snowmelt situation. The supporting computations need to be submitted. • • • Drainage Review Page 3 July 3, 2002 for Stoneybrook 8. Groundwater information was not provided. The City's Local Water Management plan calls for the minimum floor elevation, including basement to be 4 feet above the groundwater, 4 feet above the normal water level, or 2 feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, whichever is greatest. The lowest opening is also required to be at least 1 foot above the emergency overflow. Response letter stated groundwater levels were being monitored. Has final determinations been made yet? 9. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed is needed. The City will need to receive confirmation that Rice Creek Watershed District has given approval before final approval can be given from the City. 10. Proposed discharge rates to Wetland 11 seem to exceed existing condition discharge rates to Wetland 11. The use of Wetlands for rate control is discouraged. Please review Wetland 11 and its drainage. • • • April 10, 2002 COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 -4005 (763) 862 -4200 FAX (763) 862 -4201 Mike Grochala City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Stoneybrook Dear Mike: We have reviewed the preliminary plat of Stoneybrook, to be located south of CSAH 10 (Birch Street) between Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road, within the City of Lino Lakes, and I offer the following comments: Existing right -of -way adjacent to CSAH 10 should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes (60 ft right-of-way south of CSAH 10 right -of -way centerline). As proposed, the plat will introduce two (2) new city streets south of CSAH 10. These streets will line up directly opposite the existing city streets of Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road, which is acceptable to this department. However, we are concerned with the increase in the number of turning maneuvers which will occur at both intersections. As CSAH 10 is a high -speed route (55 mph), and if vehicular conflicts occur at either intersection as a result of this development, they are likely to be severe in nature. Currently on CSAH 10, there is a westbound right turn lane and an eastbound bypass lane at Pheasant Hills Drive, and a westbound right turn lane at Sherman Lake Road. With the introduction of the south leg of Pheasant Hills Drive with this development, the eastbound CSAH 10 bypass lane will no longer be an acceptable measure to handle traffic at the intersection. In addition, the Anoka County Highway Department has recently had a change in philosophy regarding the accommodation of county highway needs in conjunction with new development. This section of CSAH 10 was recently overlayed by this department, and no capital improvement projects are scheduled or planned to occur within the next five (5) years. Since this development will introduce a significant number of turning maneuvers at the intersections of Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road, the city and /or the developer will be required to make improvements to' the county highway so that there will be left, thru and right turn lanes for eastbound and westbound CSAH 10 at both intersections. The design details for this turn lane construction will need to be reviewed and approved by this department, prior to the issuance of any permits for the new access points or permits for work within the county right -of -way. The city and the Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer • Mike Roshell Preliminary Plat Review Stoneybrook April 10, 2002 Page 2 • • developer should plan on arranging a meeting with us to discuss and determine these design details. No driveways will be permitted onto CSAH 10, and all access for this development shall be made via Pheasant Hills Drive and Sherman Lake Road. The right -of- access along CSAH 10 shall be dedicated to Anoka County, with exceptions at the two (2) new local roadways. It appears that there are sight distance obstructions at both new intersections on CSAH 10. The city and /or the developer shall ensure that the applicable sight distance requirements are met to the greatest extent possible for this development. Drainage calculations and detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans are required and must be submitted to this department for review and approval. The post - developed rate /volume of discharge shall not exceed the pre - developed rate /volume of discharge for the 10 -year frequency storm, utilizing the "SCS Method" of design. If culverts are required within the county right -of -way, they shall include 6:1 safety grates and aprons. If any trails are to be constructed along CSAH 10 in conjunction with this development, the design and location of the trail within the county right -of -way shall be reviewed and approved by this department. It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result in complaints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could exceed Noise Standards established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The city and /or the developer should assess the noise situation and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. A permit is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. License Permit Bonding, Method of Construction, Design Details, Work Zone Traffic Control, Restoration Requirements and Follow -up Inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Please contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician for further information regarding the permit process. Please not that we are concerned with the safety issues that may occur on CSAH 10 as a result of this development. In the past, the neighborhoods along CSAH 10 have been rather vocal in voicing their concerns about this corridor. It is our hope that the City of Lino Lakes will take this into account, and have a supportive, proactive approach toward dealing with the recommendations for this development that have been outlined above. We look forward to • Mike Roshell Preliminary Plat Review Stoneybrook April 10, 2002 Page 3 • • addressing these issues with the city and the developer until a favorable outcome for both the transportation system and the development can be achieved. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jane Pemble Traffic Engineer xc: Doug Fischer, P.E., Director of Highways Tom Hornsby, Traffic Services Superivisor— Signs Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator Mike Kelly, Chief Right -of -Way Agent Josie Scott, Permit Technician Larry Hoium, County Surveyor 2002 City of Lino Lakes File • • JUl.- 1V -GWV4 LD•Jr SH1N1 r'HUL WHlt}'I UTILITY SAINT PAUL REGIONAL WATE R SERVICES Date: July 10, 2002 Engineering Division 8 4th St E Suite 400 Saint Paul MN 55101 651 292 7811 P.01/02 Voice: 651- 2664270 Fax: 651- 292 -7811 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET PLEASE DELIVER TO: Brian Krystofiak Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Phone: 763 -489 -2271 Fax: 763 -783 -1883 Total Number of Pages: 2 FROM: 8111 Tschida phone: 651. 266 -6265 • -7 --zoo 2 REMARKS: Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) has reviewed the plans for the Stoneybrook development, as received on July 10, 2002, and has the following comments regarding a future roadway and utility crossing of the Board of Water Commissioners easement at Street B extended: 1. The raw water conduit located in the easement area will require protection in the form of an 8- inch reinforced concrete mat as show on the attached Exhibit "B". 2. A driveway access on both sides of the roadway must be provided to retain the ability of SPRWS crews to travel north and south with equipment. 3. A removable barrier such as a gated fence must be provided along both sides of the roadway within the easement area -to discourage access from .the roadway yet allow SPRWS crews to transport equipment over the roadway. 4. Utility crossings, as well as plans addressing the above requirements, must be approved in advance of construction. 5. A Rider to Agreement between the Board and the City of Lino Lakes granting permission for a crossing and specifying the above and other conditions must. be executed prior to construction in the easement area. You can reach me at 651 -266 -6265 to discuss questions of concerns. : Hard copy will follow via U.S. Mall X : Hard copy will not follow via U.S. Mali • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7D Tanda Gretz August 26, 2002 Minor Subdivision &Variance 1487 Ash Street Corey & Shelly Bachman (applicants) Warren Bachman (owner) ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Warren Bachman owns 29 acres at 1487 Ash Street and is applying for a Minor Subdivision and a Variance from the minimum lot width requirements in order to split 11 acres off, which he then plans to sell to his son and daughter -in -law, Corey and Shelly Bachman. This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1. General Location Map 2. Certificate of Survey 3. Applicant Narrative ( "Variance for 1487 Ash St/Finding of Facts ") ANALYSIS The attached Certificate of Survey shows the proposed division of the 29 -acre parcel. Parcel B, approximately 18 acres, contains Mr. Bachman's home, outbuildings and agricultural fields; parcel A, approximately 11 acres, contains the balance of the property. The applicants report they plan to site a home fronting Ash Street and keep the northern 10 acres in agriculture, thereby qualifying for Green Acres status. City Council Meeting Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance August 26, 2002 The site is almost completely in agriculture at this time, excepting the area immediately surrounding the existing house and outbuildings and the pond/drainage area at the southeastern corner of the property. Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Low Density, Sewered Res. Rural West Low Density, Sewered Res. Rural North Low Density, Sewered Res. Rural East Low Density, Sewered Res. Rural South Low/Medium Density Residential Rural Minimum Lot Requirements Size: the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is ten acres. Both parcels would meet this requirement. Width: the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone is 330 feet. Lot width is defined in the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance as "the horizontal distance between the side lot line of a lot measured at the building setback line and parallel to the front lot line." Additionally, the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 1001.08, subd. 6, requires that "all lots shall abut for their full frontage on a publically dedicated street." Parcel A, at 221.6 feet, does not meet the minimum lot width requirement, and as a result the applicant is asking for a Variance. With less than the required 330' of lot width, then, Parcel A also does not fulfill the requirement of having full frontage on a road. Easements & Right -of -Way All created lots are required to be covered by drainage and utility easements. The applicant will need to dedicate drainage and utility easements to the City in accordance with Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 4. Such easements shall be five feet in width along rear and side property lines, ten feet in width along front property lines, and cover all ponding and wetland areas. In addition, street right -of -way dedication will be required according to the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 10. Buildable Area Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.1.b. requires Rural parcels of 10 acres or more to have at least 20% upland area. Both parcels meet this requirement, as there are 2 City Council Meeting Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance August 26, 2002 • wetlands and/or drainage easements only in the far southeast corner of the proposed 18- acre parcel. Septic Issues Soils tests confirm that the proposed 11 -acre parcel is capable of accommodating a septic system. In addition, there is adequate room for both primary and secondary sites. The 18- acre parcel already contains a septic system, with adequate room for a secondary site. Access Issues The existing 29 -acre parcel contains an access drive onto Ash Street. A second access drive will be required for the proposed 11 -acre parcel. As Ash Street is a County road, plans have been forwarded to the Anoka County Highway Department for review and approval. Future Implications It should be noted, that while the property is Rural now, development is likely at some point in time once utilities become available — post 2010, since this is a Stage 2 Growth Area. In terms of long range planning, ensuring that lot dimension requirements are maintained now will help ensure the orderly facilitation of that probable future development. For example, the area north of the proposed home site is likely to be subdivided at some future time. At such a time, room for road access then becomes a vital issue. In this case, siting a home in the middle of a lot having only 221 feet of width/road frontage may preclude the possibility of servicing the area north of the proposed home with future road access (a home and attached garage measuring 50 feet, sited in the middle of a 221 -foot lot, does not leave enough room on either side for 66 feet of road width and setbacks...). Future road access across the second proposed lot (Parcel B) may also be problematic, as there appears to be only approximately 50 -60 feet between the existing home and the edge of a pond/wetland area at the southeastern corner of the property. Maintaining the required minimum lot width of 330 feet would preclude such future problems. Section 3, subdiv. 3.A.2.b.5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance addresses such issues when it states: "All subdivisions in areas without public sanitary sewer shall be designed such that the larger non -sewer lots can be resubdivided to provide smaller sewered lots when sewer becomes available in the future. Homes and accessory buildings shall be located on these lots so as to allow for future resubdivisions." Additionally, utility availability is often financially feasible only when shared among a group of property owners. Thus, limiting future development possibilities in ways such City Council Meeting Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance August 26, 2002 • as are described above, may limit future utility availability for other property owners along Ash Street by limiting the number of future lots to pay for it. • • FINDINGS FOR VARIANCE In considering all requests for Variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Comment: The property has been, and currently is, being put to reasonable use for agricultural purposes. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property and not created by the landowner. Comment: There is no unique physical circumstance existing on the property; there is simply not enough width and road frontage to meet the minimum lot requirements for a property in the Rural zone, as established under City Ordinance. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Comment: There is no hardship demonstrated or apparent; the lot simply does not meet the minimum lot requirements for a property in the Rural zone. 4. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Comment: Granting a Variance without the demonstration of hardship or unique physical circumstances would confer special privilege upon the applicant. It should be noted that other parcels along Ash Street which do not meet minimum lot width requirements exist as lots of record, and did not require a Variance from the City Zoning Ordinance for their creation (NOTE: the property which Mr. Bachman references, at 1573 Ash Street, is such a lot of record). 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. City Council Meeting Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance August 26, 2002 Comment: The proposed action would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance, as variances are to be granted only in cases where hardship /unique physical circumstances are present. CONCLUSION The creation of the proposed 11 -acre parcel will not satisfy the 330' lot width requirement for property located in a Rural zone, and thus will also not yield full frontage on a street, as required under the Lino Lakes Ordinance. For these reasons, staff cannot recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision. As there are no hardship issues demonstrated or unique physical circumstances apparent on the property, staff cannot recommend approval of the Variance from the minimum lot width requirements. P & Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the August 14, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted 5 -1 to approve the Minor Subdivision and Variance. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend denial of the Minor Subdivision & Variance 2.) Recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision & Variance 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1. If the Council choose to approve the Minor Subdivision and Variance, staff would recommend the following conditions: 1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665, to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front property line and five feet in width along the side and rear property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. • City Council Meeting Bachman Minor Subdivision & Variance August 26, 2002 • 3.) The applicant shall dedicate permanent public right -of -way along Ash Street (County Road J). Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. 4.) Any septic system be site ten feet or more from property lines, according to building code. • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-96 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1487 ASH STREET (BACHMAN MINOR SUBIDIVISON & VARIANCE) WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Minor Subdivision & Variance for property, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish requirements for Minor Subdivisions & Variances, and WHEREAS, the proposed Minor Subdivision & Variance would result in the creation of property with less than the minimum lot width requirement of 330 feet for property located in a Rural zone, in violation of Section 5, subd. 1.B.2 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the proposed Minor Subdivision & Variance would result in the creation of property with less than the required full frontage abutting on a publicly dedicated street, in violation of the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance 1001.08, subdiv.6, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council denies the proposed Minor Subdivision & Variance, as described by the attached document entitled "Lot Split Survey for Corey Bachman" by Development Engineering, P.A., dated July 8, 2002. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of —, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor EXHIBIT # / _,., ...�ooAm ©o ©0011 maktsdem a`' CITY OFUTE1M rnv °F UNO LOXES angi oeo 46w onoo= aAmrfraie Neu ME GCCDDnt1 1m� - o- • MAP OF OF LINO LAKES, • • • NOHTFI�` 1308Vd 03SOd021d 0 23806 60St'n1 210 '13 *OS P L'S9Y 2 •0 mgr • 3'IV3S DIHdWIO 01 380438) 6386 16101 UT) — 1.265.175 SO. FT. OR 29.0444 ACRES (M /a (Nod s an7oxa) z °go 0 DC > N n ti m, 0 Z O 0 1 ?=A mZ N m Z 8 g12,7, o=m 2.�DS z 0, mmA m-44 N 8 . i 1 Im >? 600'09'52'E 264.00 `�4,♦ 1 nm [nm YA»m m o.hv� •O1YV w0» "00 ur w m 14 h Y?u m momma y�.� -er 0 Ct�Oyroa ivm0.mow m '1 m ep O 7 m'1 • m 4 A "�N b QU17 ".•O2 Y� 4�E A y• �'' m Y„" 1mm"o"0Xnhrm4:1;gg1 "2. 5 h�ho9 Gn timOh m••' pLY '�!' -O'Y �I O G'e�V1S e1 C.0`"_b."A.�eat om emV� m'1 mp.hmci �o�m �. »mom ha0'�sya rqm ^oy:: yc0i1� rs am� m o.O� o v (4(4 4'4 m •0..' '� mW m time " -o-Vco :1-T;42 ogea o'1 'S5g;,. - ti*R3w5 5nti NQ Sm tiw Sm m a0'm ih ... 9. 0 0— m. ~ m'• m " N011V001 1S31 2183d 6310N30 • 0 N 2 13S 1NN Ad S310N30 • PROPOSED PARCEL "A" DESCRIPTION ..................................... ............................... 1327.50 .................... .......................... N00'09'52 "W N Ip 1063.50 607.85 N.U. N v1 F � 264.00 N00'09'52 "W 225.65 �A'6o 41� Ap 0608 116HdS6 40 3303 '(000 •{ v N00'09'52 "W 500'17'17 "E 500'17'17 E n4M 834.61 1 4w .1 1 1 T1 671.85 iCtiPli iT • 1290.21 Ce ?i ?1'i0p1•r N 455,85 QSSO '4 1325.68 _1 tw" OaOVD1 x0Om zm-4, m 2 Wm eJ Nm >0-4z r0= Nm N m N D0' z,10 o N C A D sRm =,,711 gm 1325.26 w -4 m 0 • • • AL1 FtiH,')I'f3 # naillXa EXIIBIT # 3 • VARIANCE FOR 1487 ASH STREET • FINDING OF FACTS Sewer and water will not be brought through until a much later date, therefore, the land can not be developed. If a variance is granted, a new home along with well and septic will be occupying 1+ acres. The additional 10 acres of land will be left in Green Acres and will continue to be farmed. There are no homes built nearby that have 330 feet of road frontage. Furthermore, a new home was built last year at 1573 Ash Street with much less road frontage than what we would have upon approval of a variance. • • AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz C.C. MEETING DATE: August 26, 2002 TOPIC: Minor Subdivision for property located at 900 Oak Lane Mary Zehowski ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Mary Zehowski is applying for a Minor Subdivision of 30 acres, zoned Rural, at 900 Oak Lane. Although the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is 10 acres, Ms. Zehowski is seeking to create a 2.5 -acre parcel and a 27.5 -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, subd. 3.A.2.b.2 of the Lino Lakes City Code: "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten acres, or is serviced by public sewer, and it can be demonstrated by means satisfactory to the City that the division will not result in ground water, soil, or other contamination which may endanger the public health." This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1. General Location Map II, 2. Certificate of Survey, dated August 5, 2002 • • City Council Meeting Zehowski Minor Subdivision August 26, 2002 ANALYSIS The attached Certificate of Survey shows the proposed division of the 30 -acre parcel. Parcel A, 2.5 acres, contains an existing house and garage, of which 51.7% is upland; Parcel B, 27.5 acres, contains the balance of the property, of which 28.1 % is upland. Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site 1/2 Low Density, Unsewered Residential; '/2 Medium Density Residential Rural West Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural North Low Density, Unsewered Residential & Rural Rural- Executive East Medium Density Residential Rural South Public /Semi - Public (Regional Park across 35W) Public /Semi - Public Minimum Lot Requirements Size: the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is ten acres. The proposed newly created lot would meet this requirement, with the balance of the property consisting of the 2.5 -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, subd. 3.A.2.b.2. Width: the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone is 330', and both lots will meet this requirement. In addition, both lots will have full frontage on a road, as required under the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance, Section 1008.08, subdiv. 6, which states that "all lots shall abut for their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street." Easements and Right -of -Way All created lots are required to be covered by drainage and utility easements. The applicant will need to dedicate drainage and utility easements to the City in accordance with Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 4. Such easements for shall be five feet in width along side property lines, ten feet in width along front and rear property lines, and cover all ponding and wetland areas. In addition, street right -of -way dedication will be required according to the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 10. City Council Meeting Zehowski Minor Subdivision August 26, 2002 Buildable Area Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.1.b requires parcels requiring a minimum of 10 acres or more to have a minimum of 20% upland area. Much of this property is wetland, and as a result, it was necessary for the applicant to delineate wetland boundaries. Results of that delineation indicate that both lots meet the minimum upland requirement, with Parcel A at 51.7% upland and Parcel B at 28.1% upland. Septic Issues Soils tests confirm that there are soils on both the proposed parcels capable of accommodating a septic system, with enough room for both primary and secondary sites. Property Boundaries/Encroachment Issues The western property boundary of the parcel is currently being confirmed, as it appears some of the outbuildings belonging to the property are actually sited on the neighboring property. City Attorney Bill Hawkins has advised that such issues should not interfere with the processing of the application for a Minor Subdivision, and should be handled as a separate issue. CONCLUSION The proposed Minor Subdivision would result in two lots: Parcel A, although under 10 acres, conforms to Section 3, subd. 3.A.2.b.2 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, and otherwise meets all the minimum lot requirements for property in a Rural zone; Parcel B meets all minimum lot requirements for property in a Rural zone. As a result, staff would recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision with the following conditions: 1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665, to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in width along the side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. 3.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City a 33 -foot wide permanent public right -of- way adjacent to Oak Lane. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. • City Council Meeting Zehowski Minor Subdivision August 26, 2002 P &Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the August 14, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision, with conditions. 2.) Recommend denial of the Minor Subdivision. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1. • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-97 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 900 OAK LANE (ZEHOWSKI MINOR SUBDIVISION) WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Minor Subdivision of property, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish requirements for Minor Subdivisions, and WHEREAS, the proposed Minor Subdivision would result in the creation of property in conformance with the above - stated ordinance and regulations, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council approves the proposed Minor Subdivision, as described by the attached document entitled "Sketch and Description for Mary Zehowski," prepared by E.G. Rud and dated August 5, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1. A park dedication fee of $1,665, to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2. The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in width along the side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. 3. The applicant shall dedicate to the City a 33 -foot wide permanent public right -of -way adjacent to Oak Lane. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of � 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor 011113111■04V45_101/11' ri f��1: W , � neem©eentmeceeaeen i jIIpL:ffJ EXHIBIT # / ,cHoo rl�- r��iru fldYftli�� y.��;, sterst ■II111 Vim wr vest iew,eea-r� r IIIII vmm ©eAO© v deee37 ®iuoY /rmmE2� -P��,i.+.% ���IIM1�111111 mill �Is DO e*.a�+� _� "'"�0 ,� NO 14 -- -fr.4V PM *-NUF2!- INIMISSOMI WATCH LAKE • MARSHAN LAKE 0 0 w K I> :J2bouoN Toafo d L Fri i009-98L-f9L X 9558-98L-f9L 'Iol (lam a 0, u r x .„„X1 m1`c Hi 0 (poll • z z v, m O ( tP b• m n 0 O 'ON asua�!� ��9 I�aJpdo�� 0 n cD ,\ to 'Wf11YO O3161f1SSV NO 38V NMOHS SONI8V38 t 0 W 0 PI M 00 1--1 mm V/ CI) X 0 0)r z w 0 m r 0 0 O 0 z -0 •- rn m 0 0 m to S383V £L'9Z = S32:13V 6L' — S3LI3V 0 P1 z 0 --I m (n 33N33 DNIISIX3 z m D n rn w --1 0 D r- AREA — RIGHT OF WAY = AREA EXCLUDING R/W O m z O P-1 tit 03 C z 0 0 0 0 0 m rn zz 00 00 -- D NJ 0 z D 0 = 0 z 0 D O -4 Z -4 0 m O z z m+z C m Z 2.5 ACRES — .25 ACRES = 2.25 ACRES :v 133EIdd TOTAL AREA — RIGHT OF WAY = AREA EXCLUDING R/W 0 m z D D W c. 0 0 c 7 0 7 S ID z g oo 0 4- Er 5 • 0 0 0 0 c x • 0 • 0 O C 0 c co 7 D- a u O (O O. N - 0 O 0 c -, F 0 3• Da ( o 0 m .c 3 0 ((55 0 a 0 3 0 0 - (n O CD 0' m .< c -, D h 3 0 fi 0 0 0 0 rt o 0 a o 'e 3 3. 0 16.63 C) O 3 7 7 0 CO 0 O O 0 s}uawasoa 0 (0 n 0 a 14p-1oN ay} ;o }o Pal 02 0 S 0 TsemyfnoS :v 13D?db'd C3S0dOedd m 0 = SN011d12J0S3G S 0 3 f 0 W UI 0 0 f O n 0 (0 0. 0 a 0 y. 0 Cr S 0 O_ 0a C X 0 0 0 0 3J CI O 7 0 N 1J (n 0 C rt (o 0 0 CD 13 3- O 17 O S (D uo!ToaS Jo w 0 0 N N 3 0 0 West line of the / NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 S00'02'4'9"K / S00'02'49 "1 1 1304.67 974.87 rT` 1 3 \ - 1 ■ • f r -7 \ t - t m x z 0 :N011dI613S30 -1V03-1 1321.30 0 tr ,g; 6 8 0 cn'0 x 0 0( ('J 91790-906-E:96 • 330.00 'ac? I t 14 s t die 9 9 IL ® 8 e 33 330.0 O. S00'02'49"1') 330.00 East linetof the West, 330 feet of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1 /4I 1ppg a �r� o 0 y X •O N N a YI o I i 9 \ J 8 I...0l, ZS.68N t 00s. \ 12.4 645.44 ■ \\\ • 4i t Y® 3 658.9 00 08'16 "H' \ SO0'08'16 "11 671.30 1316.74 ' Y 4,11 \ East line of the _ NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 1 • 1 # 1IHIHXL • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 7F Michael Grochala August 26, 2002 Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -102 Approving Clearwater Creek 5t" Addition Development Agreement The City Council approved the preliminary plat of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition on March 22, 1999. Gor -Em, LLC, the Developer, is now requesting to approval to begin construction of improvements to complete the final phase of the development, to be known as Clearwater Creek 5th Addition. Clearwater Creek 5th Addition consists of 54 single family residential lots. In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy staff has prepared a Development Agreement. The agreement provides for the following: 1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of $906,850.00 representing 150% percent of the development improvement costs to insure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of $117,355.00 representing 35% of the costs to be assessed for the project. 3. Deposit of a cash escrow in the amount of $139,400.00 to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the development and improvement of the site and developer improvements. Gor -Em development has reviewed the agreement and is aware of the conditions setforth. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 02 -102 2. Do not authorize execution of the agreement. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. • • • RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 02 -102 2. Development Agreement • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-29 RESOLUTION APPROVING CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The City Council approved the preliminary plat of Clearwater Creek 31d Addition on March 22, 1999, and WHEREAS, the Developer, Gor -Em, LLC is requesting approval to commence construction of the final phase of such development to be known as Clearwater Creek 5th Addition; and WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes to insure satisfactory completion of public improvements, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the Development Agreement with Gor -Em, LLC for Clearwater Creek 5th Addition and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of August, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Clearwater Creek Fifth Addition THIS AGREEMENT made this day of ,20_, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Gor -Em LLC whose address is 1875 Station Parkway, Andover, MN 55304 hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Clearwater Creek Fifth Addition, hereinafter called "Subdivision ", said land is legally described to -wit Outlot B and C of Clearwater Creek 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, the Developer requested that the City construct and finance certain improvements to service the plat; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the plat; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City installed improvements to the benefited property. WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of final plat; and herein, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: that the I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ". B. Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ". II. DEVELOPER'S IMPROVEMENTS A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan, preliminary street and utility plan, a surface water management plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements, said contractor shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion. All Developer improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grading Plan a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with maximum two foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site grading. b) Other items as listed in the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). 2. Erosion Control Plan a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall submit a Turf Establishment Plan which details topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 3. Tree Preservation Plan page 2 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition a) Developer will provide a tree preservation plan prior to final plat approval which shall be in accordance with the City Tree Preservation Policy and the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). Developer shall plant a boulevard tree for each side of a lot which abuts a street. Species, size and location shall be determined by the City Forester. Said plan shall be approved by the City and implemented prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall remove, dispose of, or treat all dead and diseased trees in accordance with the City Forester's recommendation before building permits will be issued. 4. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the Developer shall complete items II.A.l, II.A.2, and II.A.3 as listed above. b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the approved Grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other regulatory agencies. c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. f) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. g) The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer page 3 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition • shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy. • • h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded. i) The front 50 feet of the lots, the street right -of -way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility construction. j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion. k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of building permits. 1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. This should include a combination of roadside silt fences, roadside sod strips, catch basin rock bale inlet protection, rock construction entrances, straw mulch, and/or street sweeping. m) The developer's engineer shall certify, in writing, that all grading complies with the grading plan. 5. Final street grading, subbase, gravel base, bituminous binder course, and concrete curb and gutter. 6. Park trail grading, subbase, gravel base, and bituminous surfacing. If required, installation of boardwalk trails or acceptable substitute or prefabricated walkway panels. 7. Storm sewers when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances. 8. Sanitary sewer, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services and other appurtenances. 9. Water, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances. 10. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot corner irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan - guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. page 4 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition 11. The Developer agrees to maintain, at all times before acceptance of the streets by the City, an access road suitable for use by emergency, police and fire department equipment. The adequacy of such road shall be the sole determination of the City. Furthermore, such access road shall be located no more than 150 feet from any structure built within the subdivision. 12. The Developer shall be responsible for street and storm sewer maintenance, including curbs, boulevards, sod and street sweeping, ditch cleaning and pond dredging until the project is compete and accepted by the City. 13. The Developer shall only be responsible for such maintenance until completion of the subdivision if caused by Developer, its purchasers, builders or contractors. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The developer shall maintain a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris resulting from construction by the Developer, its agents or assigns within five (5) days after notification by the City. 14. Street Lighting: a) Residential street lighting shall be owned by the City. Such street lighting system shall be installed, operated, and maintained by the electric utility company. City and electric utility company may enter into a contractual agreement on the rate and maintenance of the street lighting system. b) It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to pay for street lighting operation charges for the initial 15 months of operation of the system. 15. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, prior to approval of the final plat, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer's Improvements as determined by the City. All such easements required by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City shall determine. 16. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities. page 5 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition 17. The Developers shall make provision that all gas, telephone, cable TV and electric utility designs be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to construction of the streets. Following review and approval by the City, the Developer shall insure that all installation comply with applicable City, County and State design standards and show proof of security arrangements with said utility companies. 18. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description and completion dates are as shown on Attachment A. 19. Construction of Developer's Improvements: a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer's and City's Improvements as determined by the City. d) All Construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the developers expense and in a timely manner as determined by the City. 20. Guarantee a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit (1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer's Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit page 6 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. (1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the warranty provisions of the agreement. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. III. CITY'S IMPROVEMENTS A. The City shall install the following described improvements to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth: 1. Storm sewer trunks. 2. Sanitary sewer trunks. 3. Water trunks. 4. Final wear course. B. Construction Procedures 1. All City improvements above shall be instituted, constructed and financed as follows: The City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429 and City Charter providing that such improvements be made and assessed against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if page 7 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition required by law, will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering such City Improvements. After preparation of the final plans and specifications by the City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and contract awarded for the installation of City Improvements under the City's complete supervision. C. Security, Levy of Special Assessments and Required Payment Therefore. 1. Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said City Improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow or letter of credit in an amount equal to thirty -five (35 %) percent of the total estimated assessments as established by the City Engineer. (See Attachment B) 2. Said letter of credit or cash escrow including accrued interest thereon, may be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. That such cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the special assessments, except, the amount of such escrow or letter of credit may be reduced, upon the request of the Developer, at the City's option, but in no event shall be less than 35% of the outstanding special assessments against all properties within the Subdivision. The entire cost of the installation of such City Improvements, including any reasonable engineering, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be assessed against the benefited properties within the Subdivision in accordance with City policy existing the date of this agreement, in equal annual principal installments plus interest on the unpaid installments at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law. 3. All special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City Clerk in semi -annual installments over fifteen (15) years commencing on April 15 of the year after the levy of such assessment and on each September 15 and April 15 thereafter until the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full unless paid earlier. In the alternative, the City, at its option, may certify the entire assessment roll to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the Real Estate Taxes. In the event any payment is not made on the dates set out herein, the City may exercise its rights granted hereunder for such default. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the City Improvements and the special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. In the event the total of all City Installed Improvements is less than originally estimated by the City Engineer in his feasibility report, Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081. page 8 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition D. Required Payments of Special Assessments by Developer. 1. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns hereby agrees that within thirty (30) days after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residence on a lot located within the Subdivision which is assessed for the cost of such City Improvements, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees, at its own cost and expense, to pay the entire unpaid City Improvement Costs assessed or to be assessed under this agreement against such property. 2. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum of cash equal to one hundred twenty percent (120 %) of the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for such City Improvements that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the City shall issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arising from the payment based upon such estimate. Developer will be paid interest on all assessments paid before the levy of such assessments by the City at the bond interest rates paid by the City. E. Acceleration Upon Default. 1. In the event the Developer violates any of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein contained to be performed by the Developer, violates any ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat, or fails to pay any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder, after ten (10) days' written notice to the Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City may seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the security provided herein. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest the City may certify such outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor pursuant to M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attorney's fees, and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. Also, if Developer violates any term or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by Developer pursuant to this agreement the City, at its option, may refuse to issue page 9 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition . building permits to any of the property within the plat on which the assessments have not been paid. • • IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract. V. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the plat and the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See attachment B for Breakdown of costs): 1. Plat Review Fee 2. Planner Review Fee 3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost 4. Engineering a) Administration 5. Legal - Plat Review 6. Publications 7. Park Dedication Fee 8. Tree Preservation Policy 9. Street Lighting - Install/Operate 10. Traffic Signing Improvements 11. Boulevard Tree Planting 12. Street - Storm Sewer - Pond Maintenance 13. Sealcoating Fund 14. Aerial Photo Recovery Cost page 10 • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the developer shall make such additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow. VI. BUILDING PERMITS A. The Developer agrees that building permits may be issued upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council at which time all required Financial Security shall be in place with the City. B. The Developer further agrees that City Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Bituminous Base Construction of the Streets, temporary street signs, gas, electric, and telephone will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. VII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set out in City Ordinances as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed VIII. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. IX. INSURANCE A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance page 11 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition 41, written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. • X. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. XI. VALIDITY A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. XII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect 1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices 1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. C. Final Plat Approval 1. The city agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision and MUSA allocation of 20.8 acres upon execution and delivery of this agreement and of all required petitions, bond and security. XIII. VIOLATIONS/BUILDING PERMITS A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its page 12 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. XIV. PARK DEDICATION A. Park dedication for Clearwater Creek Fifth Addition shall consist of: 1. All trails. 2. Paving of the trails with bituminous surface at Developer's cost. 3. Conveyance of Outlot A, Clearwater Creek 5th Addition to the City of Lino Lakes. B. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of the developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover the cost of said property taxes. XV. OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN A. The Developer and City shall perform the actions as described in the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). page 13 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 5th Addition DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES By By Developer Mayor AI 1EST: By Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of , 20_. before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary public page 14 • • • Development Contract, Clearwater Creek 5th Addition STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA On this day of , of 20_, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be the , of , a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public page 15 ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: • APPLICANT: Gor -em, LLC Clearwater Creek 5th Addition ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS 1 SITE GRADING 2 EROSION CONTROL 3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 4 PARK & TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 5 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT 6 STREET CONST. A. Base Course B. Wear Course 7 STORM SEWER CONST. A. Trunk B. Lateral C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) SANITARY SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) C. Lateral 9 WATERMAIN CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) C. Lateral TOTALS: BUDGET COST Bid Amount NA Bid Amount Bid Amount $0 Bid Amount Estimate e NUMBER OF REU's: 54 ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 20.8 DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) e $20,000 RCWD e $5,000 f (in other items) e (3rd addition) e $271,765 Bid Amount $0.050 a $2,203 a $955 a Bid Amount e $2,350 a $1,541 a Bid Amount e e $78,905 See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted NOTE: a: b: c: d: e: f: i Cost by City policy Estimated Cost or Budget by City Previously Assessed Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board Provided by Developer Estimate by Feasibility Study 8/21/02 $125,880 $60, 500 $45,305 $45, 825 $51,570 $48,880 $83,214 $103,015 $604,565 $335,294 so Clearw Creek 5- st &util.xls ATTACHMENT B CITY FEES DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Creek 5th Addition NUMBER OF REU's: 54 • APPLICANT: Gor -em, LLC ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 20.8 BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 1 PLAT REVIEW FEE $3,900 b $3,900 2 PLANNER REVIEW FEE $1,500 b $1,500 3 ADMINISTRATION -3% OF CONST. 3% of const. a $18,140 4 ENGINEERING A. Plan/Plat/Grading Review $2,500 b $2,500 B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. $0 b C. Construction Services $38,000 b $38,000 D. Construction Staking $0 b E. City Engineering $10,500 b $10,500 5 LEGAL PLAT REVIEW FEE $540 b $540 6 PUBLICATIONS $400 b $400 7 PARK DEDICATION FEE $0 d 8 TREE PRESERVATION POLICY $4,320 b $5,000 9 STREET LIGHTING INST. & OPER. $1,680 b $13,440 ifik TRAFFIC SIGNING IMPROV. $3,000 b $3,000 III BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $12,150 b $12,150 12 STREET, ST. SWR. & POND MAINT. $6,000 b $6,000 13 SEALCOATING FEE $11,500 a $11,500 14 FEMA Processing Fee N/A $3,000 15 AERIAL PHOTO COST RECOVERY $4,860 a $4,860 16 OTHER - Property Tax Escrow $5,000 b $5,000 a TOTALS: $0 0 $139,430 SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED Att. A Att. B Total X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $906,850 $0 $906,850 Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $117,355 $0 $117,355 Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) $0 $139,430 $139,430 NOTE: a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed • d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study 8/21/02 Clearw Creek 5- st &util.xls 0-04rJerh,/t47 KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE S COMPANY Protadtna Sound. Balanced Compreitensiue Natural Resource Solutions To: 'Mike Quigley — Gor -EM From:. Mark Kjolhaug Hate: -September.13, 1999 .Re:' Open Space Management Plan for Clearwater Creek:3'1 Addition 1. General Approach and Strategy The following items represent 'general strategies utilized in developing area specific recommendations for restoration: 1. • Reseed all areas disturbed by project grading with native.. prairie seed. mixtures — wet • or mesic — as appropriate. Manage these areas with mowing, chemical, and fire t'reatrnents until community is fully established. Long -term management by City could include spot chemical treatments as necessary, burns, or mowing. . 2- Kill existing weedy herbaceous plant communities and replace them With native prairie seed mixtures — wet or.mesic — as appropriate. Manage these areas with . imowing,. chemical, .and fire treatments until community is fully established. Long - ' term management by City could include spot chemical treatments as necessary, burns, • or mowing. 3. Protect wooded areas and scattered significant trees. Remove invasive-shrubs to allow for recovery of native herbaceous communities. Long -term management by the City.vould include monitoring and removal of invasive shrubs. 4.. Protect quality.wetlands with buffers and filter strips. Use signage to minimize dumping and mowing within wetland and buffers. Long -term management by City would include monitoring and enforcement. 5.. Restore/supplement wetland hydrology when possible by blocking ditches or outleting storm water ponds. Wetland restorations, which affect wetlands on adjacent properties, are not recommended. 6. Restore herbaceous wetland plant communities when prudent by spraying, scraping, • and reseeding. 4767 Ridh+nond•Road. Mound. Minnesota 55364 • Phone, 612 -472 -4875 • Fax: 611- 472 '1o4o • • 7. Remove spoil piles when possible without damaging trees or existing natural plant communities. 8. Remove trash when encountered. IL Specific Approach and Strategy Areas proposed for similar treatment are grouped for this discussion. The area numbers refer to those indicated on the attached plan. A. Ravesetate With Wet or Mesic Prairie Seed Mixture. General activities within these areas will include removal (via chemical and mechanical treatment) of existing weedy communities, seeding of appropriate native prairie seed mixture, and short and long -term management. Management activities may include spot chemical.treatment, mowing, and burning. Areas between lots and the trail will be seeded with a short - growing native prairie seed mixture to provide a suitable transition. This-treatment will be used for areas A2, A3, A4, AS, A7, A8, All, B3, B6, C2, DI, E6 Acreage proposed for this treatment is 10 acres. Costs are estimated to be $1250. per acre. Total cost for areas receiving this treatment is approximately $12,500. Revegettation activities will begin in April 2000. Seeding will be completed in June 2000. Management activities associated with the establishment of the community will be completed in 2003. The long -term viability of these areas is expected to be good, with low to moderate on- going maintenance requirements. B. Revegetate Storm Water Ponds with Wet or Mesic Prairie Seed Mixture General activities will include preparation of a suitable soil surface, seeding of an appropriate native prairie seed mixture, and short and long -term management. A wet mixture will be seeded near the NWL and a mesic mixture will be seeded throughout the remainder of the graded areas. This treatment is proposed for areas Al, A6, A9, B2, E3', and E5. Acreage proposed for this treatment is 3.5 acres. Costs are estimated to be $1250. per acre. • Total cost for areas receiving this treatment is approximately $4500. Revegetation activities will be completed concurrent with project phases. Areas B2, A9, and E3 will be completed with Phase 1, Area E5 will be completed with Phase II, and Areas Al l . and A6 will be completed with Phase III. Management activities associated with the establishment of the communities will be completed within approximately 3 years of the seeding date. The long -term viability of these areas is expected to be good, with low to moderate on= going maintenance requirements. C. Existing. Wooded Areas — Invasive Shrub Removal and Management. Wooded areas throughout the property have been subject to historic disturbance.by livestock. As a result, invasive shrubs have become a dominant component of the understory, competing with more desirable native species and shading herbaceous ground cover. Management of these shrubs generally involves shrub removal and direct herbicide application.to prevent regrowth. A second treatment may be required after 1 -2 years, with a light burn, as feasible. • This.treatment is appropriate for areas A10, Bl, B4, Cl, C3; C4, and El. Appro/dinately. 7.5-acres are proposed for this treatment. _ Costs for.this treatment are expected to range from $2,500. _ $5,000 per acre. Total cost for areas receiving this treatment is $ 19,000 — $37,500. •Shrub.ren3oval will begin during April and May, 2000, and be completed by October, '2001. • The long -term-viability of this approach is uncertain. Without ongoing control activities. these, areas are likely to be re- invaded due to the abundance in seed sources on adjacent • properties. D. Wetlatnd Vegetation Restoration Wetland E3 (Wetland E) currently is dominated by a reed canary grass monoculture, which has Iow aesthetic and wildlife habitat values. Proposed: activities would include removal of the existing plant community by. chemical treatment and scraping, if appropriate, the upper 12 inches- of soil. The area would then be reseeded with a suitable wet meadow mixture. • • Estimated cost to complete the restoration of this 0.5 -acre wetland is $3000. • Scraping: and vegetation removal will be completed in spring, 2000. Revegetation will be completed in June, 2000. Management activities associated with the plant community establishment will be completed by October, 2003. Long -term viability of this restoration is good with low maintenance requirements. E. Wetland Reconstruction/Restoration Wetlands C, D, and F have been extensively disturbed by past excavation activities. Current conditions include marginal wetland hydrology and low diversity wetland plant • communities. Proposed activities would attempt to restore and supplement wetland hydrology, remove red canary grass, consolidate wetlands, and remove trash, to provide functionally superior„ aesthetically attractive wetland areas. These activities would include excavation, spoil removal, grading, and reseeding with a wet meadow mixture. The estimated cost to complete the reconstruction and restoration of this I.5- acre•area would be. approximately $20,000. • Grading is proposed to occur in April, 2000. Revegetation will be completed in June • 2000. Management activities associated with the plant community establishment will be completed by October, 2003. • The long -term viability of this restoration is good, with low maintenance requirements. otal cost of all . ro .. sed activities in items A throu ' h E would be ex ted to ran e from $59.000 to $77.500. F. Other Items 1: The feasibility of providing a buffer and filter strip to protect wetland area B5 should be examined. The wetland is outside of the green way areas. 2. An evaluation of hydrological restoration opportunities of wetlands partially within property boundaries should be completed. As adjacent parcels develop.:in•the .future, potential may exist for larger wetlands along the property boundaries to be restored. This applies to larger wetlands along the western and southern property boundaries. 3. An' informational/educational pamphlet should be prepared to distribute to landowners adjacent to the green way areas. The pamphlet should include information on the ecological values of the area, management efforts, and rules regarding mowing, dumping, planting, etc. within the. area. 4. Wheir feasible-without damaging trees and quality wetland plant communities, spoil pile from>previous'excavations on the property should be removed and spread on upland areas. 5. Detailed grading and seeding plans will be prepared prior to project implementation. 6, Appmpriate•infiltration methods will be utilized, where: feasible, in the placement, . • . design,-and -construction-af.the trail to minimize backyard runoff from-directly entering .adjacent wetlands. 7.. In. Year 2003, trees that have-been killed or are determined to be dying due to increased water levels within Wetland Q will be removed: • • " iazard.Trees"-adjacent to the trail will be removed at the time the trail is .constriucted. AGENDA ITEM 7G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala DATE: 8/26/02 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -98 closing the Civic Complex Construction Fund VOTE REQUIRED: Simple majority BACKGROUND: The Civic Complex Construction Fund has a balance of $85,456 and there is no activity anticipated within the fund. Staff is recommending the fund be closed and the balance be transferred to the Capital Improvements Projects Fund. OPTIONS: • 1. Adopt Resolution No. 02 -98 closing the Civic Complex Construction Fund and transferring the balance to the Capital Improvements Projects Fund 2. Do not adopt the resolution. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-98 RESOLUTION CLOSING CIVIC COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION FUND WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes established a Civic Complex Construction Fund in 1997 for the purpose of undertaking the construction of the Lino Lakes Civic Complex; and WHEREAS, the Civic Complex project is complete and has been accepted; and WHEREAS, no activity has taken place in the fund for the past year; and WHEREAS, a residual balance remains in the fund. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: The City Finance Director is authorized to close the Lino Lakes Civic Complex Construction Fund and transfer the residual balance to the Capital Improvement Projects Fund. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 26th day of August, 2002. Ann J. Blair City, Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor