Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/23/2002 Council PacketAMENDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday September 23, 2002 Council Chambers 6:30 P.M. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) September 23, 2002 (Check No. 66108 through 66238 in the amount of $277,093.93). ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 13398 through 13420 in the amount of $11,756.28). 2. Open Mike A) John Christiansen, Superintendent of Centennial Schools -- presentation on school's operating levy 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Continuation of Public Hearing on Five -Year Financial Plan 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Setting Public Hearing for First Reading of Ordinance No. 11 -02, Renewal of Cable Communications Franchise Agreement B) Consider Resolution No. 02 -125, Accepting Donation, Kieger Enterprises, for safety equipment C) Consider adopting Resolution 02 -95, Accepting Anoka County's Design for • Reconstructing CSAH 49 from Lake Drive to County Road J, Linda Waite Smith 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia Page 1 • • • AMENDED AGENDA A) Consider Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council for Public Safety Digital Radio Communications System, Anoka County Attorney, Robert M.A. Johnson B) Consider Centennial Fire items: i) Consider Accepting Donation for Fire Safety Camp, Fire Chief Bennett ii) Consider Resolution No. 02 -128, Proclamation for Fire Prevention Week, Fire Chief Bennett C) Consider Resolution No. 02 -123, Proclamation for Crime Prevention Month, Police Chief Pecchia D) Consider Resolution No. 02 -126, Accepting DOJ (COPS MORE) Police Department Technology Grant, Police Chief Pecchia E) Consider Resolution No. 02 -124, Proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month, Police Chief Pecchia 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner None. 7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 09 -02, Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement, Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 1, Pheasant Hills 9th, (Brausen property), Public Hearing, Tanda Gretz B. Consider Resolution No. 02 -115, Approving Minor Subdivision, 82XX West Rondeau Lake Road (Cardarelli / Severson property), Tanda Gretz C. Consider Resolution No. 02 -116, Approving Variance, 8065 Wood Duck Trail (Sullivan property), Tanda Gretz D. Consider Resolution No. 02 -117, Approving a Variance and a Minor Subdivision, 855 Ash Street, (Lindahl property), Tanda Gretz E. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -82, Approving Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for Russian Baptist Church, north of Ash Street, and west of Baldwin Lake Road, Tanda Gretz F. Spirit Hills Commercial Development, Michael Grochala i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 08 -02 Rezoning to GB/PDO ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -88 Approving Site and Building Plans Page 2 AMENDED AGENDA • G. Consider Resolution No. 02 -122, Accepting Drainage and Utility Easements, Lots 3 -6, Lakes Addition #2, Jeff Smyser • H. Consider Resolution No. 02 -127, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract of Triplex Panel for Lift Station #4, Jim Studenski I. Consider Resolution No. 02 -129, Accepting Feasibility Report, Calling for a Public Hearing, Elm Street Reconstruction, Jim Studenski J. Consider Resolution No. 02 -130, Accepting Feasibility Report, Calling for a Public Hearing, 62 "d Street Reconstruction, Jim Studenski K. Consider Resolutions No. 02 -XX, Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Order Preparation of Proposed Assessments, Jim Studenski (handout on Monday) L. Consider Resolutions No. 02 -XX, Setting Public Hearing for proposed Assessments, Jim Studenski (handout on Monday) 8. Unfinished Business None. 9. New Business Approval of Meeting Minutes: A) September 4, 2002, Council Work Session B) September 9, 2002 City Council Meeting 10. Community Calendar, September 24, 2002 through October 14, 2002 : A) Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 6:30 p.m. B) Special Council Work Session on Growth Management Measures, Wednesday, October 2, 2002, 6:00 p.m., Community Room C) Fall Recycling Day, Saturday, October 5, 2002, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. D) Park Board Meeting, Monday, October 7, 2002, 6:30 p.m. E) Council Work Session, Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 5:30 p.m. F) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 6:30 p.m. Page 3 • • • AMENDED AGENDA G) EDAC, Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:00 a.m. H) Charter Commission Meeting, Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:00 p.m. I) City Council Meeting, Monday, October 14, 2002, 6:30 p.m. 11. Adjourn Revised dlb 09/20/02 1:10 p.m. Page 4 EXPENDITURES SEPTEMBER 23, 2002 Date: 09/12/2002 Time: 13:09:45 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 2656 - 2656 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000013 ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 968.05 968.05 .00 .00 000021 RAMSEY POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,118.42 1,118.42 .00 .00 000023 SPRING LAKE PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,510.39 1,510.39 .00 .00 000040 A T & T 1 46.10 46.10 .00 .00 000224 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 634.04 634.04 .00 .00 000254 LAZER ELECTRIC, INC. 1 110.50 110.50 .00 .00 000255 REHBEIN, MARCIA 1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00 000401 ROTO- ROOTER 1 253.95 253.95 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 763.49 763.49 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 566.68 566.68 .00 .00 000448 MINNESOTA YOUTH INTERVENTION 1 99.00 99.00 .00 .00 1111165 DEHKES, ROBERT 1 50.50 50.50 .00 .00 000497 ROSKOWINSKI, MARY 1 78.25 78.25 .00 .00 000498 MONARCH HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 4,228.46 4,228.46 .00 .00 000697 KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000839 COON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 832.41 832.41 .00 .00 001014 T/C BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 706.84 706.84 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,136.02 3,136.02 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 720.24 720.24 .00 .00 001981 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 Date: 09/12/2002 Time: 13:09:45 City of'I.ino Lakes FM Entry/- Invoice Journal Or # Name Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 002230 DIVINE, MARY 002517 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 003250 XCEL ENERGY 003451 PERA /REGULAR 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 004560 U S HANK 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 005022 PITNEY WORKS RESERVE ACCOUNT 900223 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. Grand Totals: 1 665.00 665.00 .00 .00 1 52.43 52.43 .00 .00 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 1 18.28 18.28 .00 .00 1 6,390.46 6,390.46 .00 .00 1 16,061.44 16,061.44 .00 .00 1 193.87 193.87 .00 .00 1 192.61 192.61 .00 .00 1 1,086.89 1,086.89 .00 .00 1 15.34 15.34 .00 .00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 1 1,914.00 1,914.00 .00 .00 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 35 50,452.66 50,452.66 .00 .00* Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:08:27 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 2660 - 2660 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000012 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 1 183.10 183.10 .00 .00 000065 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. 1 26.21 26.21 .00 .00 000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 46.75 46.75 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 469.28 469.28 .00 .00 000103 ONVOY, INC. 1 47.50 47.50 .00 .00 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 111.70 111.70 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 817.00 817.00 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 2,595.32 2,595.32 .00 .00 000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD 1 38.95 38.95 .00 .00 000184 BOYLE, KATIE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 27.48 27.48 .00 .00 1111093 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 26.50 26.50 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 77.00 77.00 .00 .00 000304 KUSTERMAN, BILL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 48.49 48.49 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 2 966.63 966.63 .00 .00 000423 TWIN CITY FABRICATI, INC. 1 659.13 659.13 .00 .00 000436 EAI ENGINEERING AMERICA, INC. 1 500.02 500.02 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,134.36 1,134.36 .00 .00 000499 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 000503 RASKE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. 1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00 000505 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 5,584.00 5,584.00 .00 .00 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:08:27 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount or # Name # of items Net Grose Discount Lost 000506 WITCHER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 283.63 283.63 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 2 118.07 118.07 .00 .00 000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 4 548.49 548.49 .00 .00 000598 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 1,290.22 1,290.22 .00 .00 000613 O'CONNOR, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000675 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 1 137.40 137.40 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 785.39 785.39 .00 .00 000906 IDEA ART, INC. 1 68.75 68.75 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 119.32 119.32 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 2,497.20 2,497.20 .00 .00 000960 CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 1 46.67 46.67 .00 .00 000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 16.77 16.77 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 .00 .00 001104 LAKE COUNTRY /NORTH STAR CHAPTER 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 265.20 265.20 .00 .00 001262 D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 1 109.65 109.65 .00 .00 1111192 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 5,052.88 5,052.88 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 48.18 48.18 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 3,057.40 3,057.40 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 131.21 131.21 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 5,098.48 5,098.48 .00 .00 001504 U. S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1 1,581.25 1,581.25 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 1,363.09 1,363.09 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 109.98 109.98 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 105.13 105.13 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 107.36 107.36 .00 .00 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:08:28 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: Discount r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001720 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 4 140.46 140.46 001771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 264.00 264.00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 165.75 165.75 001875 HUELMAN, PAT 1 100.00 100.00 001965 LITTLE TIKES COMM PLAY SYSTEMS, INC 1 9,345.98 9,345.98 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 1,242.50 1,242.50 001980 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 133.34 133.34 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 43.68 43.68 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 10,252.00 10,252.00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 17.60 17.60 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 740.18 740.18 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 180.68 180.68 002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 225.00 225.00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 3 223.83 223.83 002540 MEDICA 1 30,308.32 30,308.32 002550 MENARDS, INC. 5 116.25 116.25 1111165 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 341.71 341.71 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 77,780.90 77,780.90 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 179.34 179.34 002840 MINNETONKA, CITY OF 1 38.40 38.40 002849 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE, INC. 1 58.89 58.89 003011 MONTAIN, PAUL 1 100.00 100.00 003050 MRPA 1 846.00 846.00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 392.85 392.85 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 2 701.62 701.62 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 4,120.85 4,120.85 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:08:29 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount •or # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 4,791.14 4,791.14 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES 1 100.90 100.90 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004000 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 1 95.98 95.98 .00 .00 004173 STATE OF MINNESOTA /BUILDING CODES & STAN 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,319.20 1,319.20 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 3,131.59 3,131.59 .00 .00 004367 TASCHUK, PAM 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004400 TESCH, DAN 1 29.60 29.60 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 393.31 393.31 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 934.25 934.25 .00 .00 004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 1 341.91 341.91 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 4 26,229.89 26,229.89 .00 .00 004720 VIGER, JEAN 1 117.85 117.85 .00 .00 005030 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC. 1 5,418.23 5,418.23 .00 .00 900060 DAY- TIMERS, INC. 1 34.06 34.06 .00 .00 •20 MIDWEST DIESEL SERVICE, INC. 1 292.52 292.52 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 16.99 16.99 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 116 226,641.27 226,641.27 .00 .00* • Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:41 Operator: JAL Page: City of Lino Lakes • FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Ranges: Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 2657 - 2662 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Options: Print: D Sort: D Report Format: 1 Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1 Process Payroll: N Total By Account: Y Page on Sort: N Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 66110 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 566.68 66111 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 763.49 66112 ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMEN SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 968.05 0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI SAFETY CAMP DONATIONS * * * * * * ** 4,000.00 66113 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLIC SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 706.84 66115 COON RAPIDS POLICE DEP SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 832.41 66116 DEHKES, ROBERT REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER * * * * * * ** 50.50 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 1,717.72 66119 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6704 M * * * * * * ** 500.00 66120 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. REIMS BLDG ESCROW /1354 W * * * * * * ** 500.00 66121 KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6501 S * * * * * * ** 500.00 66122 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 665.00 66123 LAZER ELECTRIC, INC. REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER * * * * * * ** 110.50 66124 MEADOW VIEW HOMES REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1174 D * * * * * * ** 500.00 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 8,939.67 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT AUGUST SAC /SEPTEMBER SEW * * * * * * ** 39,204.00 6126 MONARCH HOMES, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6316 H * * * * * * ** 500.00 66127 PERA /COUNCIL PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 193.87 66128 PERA /REGULAR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 16,061.44 66131 RAMSEY POLICE DEPARTME SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 1,118.42 0 RASKE BUILDING SYSTEMS REIMBURSE TIF ESCROW * * * * * * ** 95.00 66133 REHBEIN, MARCIA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 39.00 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 813.02 66136 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES * * * * * * ** 118.88 66137 SPRING LAKE PARK POLIC SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 1,510.39 66138 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEP SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 634.04 66139 T/C BUILDERS, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2345 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 0 TWIN CITY FABRICATI, I REIMB TIF ESCROW /CLOSE S * * * * * * ** 544.39 66140 U S BANK TRAVEL /RENTAL /SUBSCRIPTI * * * * * * ** 74.43 0 WITCHER CONSTRUCTION C REIMBURSE WATER HYDRANT * * * * * * ** 158.63 Total for Dept ** 82,886.37* 0 MRPA TOURNAMENT BERTHS /LEAGUE ADULT SP 846.00 Total for Dept 202 846.00* 0 IDEA ART, INC. CYBER SANTA SPECIAL 68.75 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:41 Operator: JAL • Page: City of Lino Lakes FM Entry Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 66132 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 205 SPECIAL 1,914.00 1,982.75* 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SHIRTS /SHIELDS /BALLS /NOT YOUTH IN 230.42 Total for Dept 207 230.42* 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES YOUTH SP 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SHIRTS /SHIELDS /BALLS /NOT YOUTH SP 0 MINNETONKA, CITY OF WATER JUGS YOUTH SP Total for Dept 208 43.68 111.29 38.40 193.37* 0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI MEMBERSHIP /2002 -2003 MAYOR /CO 10,252.00 0 MAIN FLORAL LTD FRESH ARRANGEMENT MAYOR /CO 38.95 0 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM NEWSLETTER /POSTAGE MAYOR /CO 4,791.14 O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 28 & SEPTEMBER 4 MAYOR /CO 754.75 Total for Dept 401 15;836.84* 0 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ADMINIST 817.00 0 D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST 265.20 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 104.80 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST 64.41 O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 1,189.09 0 ONVOY, INC. WEB HOSTING ADMINIST 47.50 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST 23.75 O TESCH, DAN MILEAGE /MEETING ADMINIST 29.60 66140 U S BANK TRAVEL /RENTAL /SUBSCRIPTI ADMINIST 602.46 Total for Dept 402 3,143.81* 11111 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTION 41.76 0 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOF BOOTH /LAMP /LEGS /ADAPTERS ELECTION 5,418.23 0 MENARDS, INC. ROD /FLAG ELECTION 35.53 O NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, SIGNS ELECTION 47.40 O VIGER, JEAN SUPPLIES ELECTION 117.85 Total for Dept 403 5,660.77* 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS 4.17 O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS 4.75 Total for Dept 406 8.92* 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 91.70 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE 41.48 O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FINANCE 588.49 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE 16.63 Total for Dept 407 738.30* O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 26.20 66117 DIVINE, MARY MILEAGE /TUITION ECONOMIC 52.43 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC 11.49 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE ECONOMIC 18.96 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 300.30 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:41 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 415 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 416 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 418 66114 0 66118 0 0 66108 0 66142 CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GALL'S INC. MEDICA Dept ECONOMIC PLANNING INS PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING Communit INS Communit Communit Communit MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS UNIFORM SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE M MINNESOTA YOUTH INTERV CONFERANCE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST Total for Dept 420 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 • POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE INS FIRE FIRE FIRE O DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING 66118 LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING 0 REGISTRATION /PATRICK M 0 MEDICAL INSURANCE O LIFE INSURANCE 0 REGISTRATION /PATRICK M 0 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Total for Dept 422 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LAKE COUNTRY /NORTH STA MEDICA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN STATE OF MINNESOTA /BUI SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, 0 0 66114 0 0 66118 0 0 0 66125 • AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AUTO - MEDICS, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. & BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING WELL NUTS STREETS MOVE CAR STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST STREETS WHITE MARKING PAINT STREETS DENTAL INSURANCE STREETS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS REMOVE /REPLACE CURB & GU STREETS MEDICAL INSURANCE STREETS SEALER /CEMENT STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUG STREETS Amount 4.75 414.13* 52.40 21.85 600.60 9.50 684.35* 52.40 24.37 588.49 9.50 674.76* 10.65 411.40 268.60 109.98 8,954.93 99.00 114.00 3.14 9,971.70* 50.58 22.37 1,724.29 14.25 1,811.49* 104.80 40.30 100.00 2,023.70 17.34 70.00 1,319.20 3,675.34* 27.48 175.74 652.08 109.65 104.80 56.18 264.00 900.90 24.25 8.84 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:42 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, SIGNS O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. RIBBON 0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS FINE ASPHALT 0 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. AQUANEAT /CHEM -STIK 66141 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES 66142 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST Total for Dept 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS AUTO- MEDICS, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CAPITOL CITY WELDING, DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I LEEF BROTHER, INC. LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MIDWEST DIESEL SERVICE MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SE NEW HOLLAND PLAN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SCHARBER & SONS, INC. THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH MICROPHONE /CONNECTOR TOW /JOHN DEERE PARTS /SUPPLIES OXYGEN GASOHOL DENTAL INSURANCE PARTS /SUPPLIES LONG TERM DISABILITY INS CHEMICALS SHOP TOWELS SHAFT /BLADES MEDICAL INSURANCE COUPLING REPAIR REAR BRAKES/ #241 COVER COVER LIFE INSURANCE GASKETS PARTS /SUPPLIES Total for Dept 431 66109 A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST O ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN PATCH SHOP FLOOR 0 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT RENTAL O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 66114 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES O DAY- TIMERS, INC. FILLER PAD 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST O IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, SERVICE /FAX MACHINE O LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I ANNUAL TEST O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 MENARDS, INC. SUPPLIES 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST 0 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI REPROGRAM CONTROL 0 PITNEY BOWES TAPE 66129 PITNEY WORKS RESERVE A POSTAGE RESERVE O QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST 66130 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST • STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 654.22 27.79 95.98 3,131.59 341.91 15.34 3,308.17 9,898.92* 183.10 372.75 785.39 46.67 5,052.88 26.20 1,363.09 11.39 105.13 17.60 223.83 588.49 2.22 292.52 58.89 16.77 5.46 26.21 393.31 9,571.90* 46.10 327.71 111.70 48.49 77.56 1,316.72 16.99 34.06 8.75 107.36 133.34 740.18 588.49 54.25 100.70 966.63 100.90 5,000.00 63.17 4,065.36 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:42 Operator: JAL City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Page: 5 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE GOVERNME 4.75 66136 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES GOVERNME 73.73 0 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. BELT GOVERNME 140.46 0 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. FOLD TOWELS GOVERNME 26.50 0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST GOVERNME 4,091.87 66142 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST GOVERNME 4.93 Total for Dept 432 18,250.70* 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 141.57 O BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, TORO /BUCKET RENTAL PARKS 137.40 0 DEGARDNER, RICK MILEAGE PARKS 48.18 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PARKS 144.10 0 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT STEERING WHEEL /BRACKET /E PARKS 131.21 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARKS 56.39 0 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW PARKS 165.75 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE PARKS 1,387.09 66125 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /AUG PARKS -4.12 O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 27.32 O NATURE CALLS, INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS PARKS 392.85 0 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 54.90 66130 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 108.20 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE PARKS 26.13 0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 28.98 66142 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST PARKS 55.02 Total for Dept 450 2,900.97* O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI 57.64 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI 32.67 O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI 418.00 125 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /AUG RECREATI -4.12 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI 15.20 Total for Dept 451 519.39* 0 BOYLE, KATIE QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 150.00 O HUELMAN, PAT QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 100.00 0 KUSTERMAN, BILL QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 150.00 0 LINDY, GEORGE QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 225.00 O MONTAIN, PAUL QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 100.00 0 O'CONNOR, MICHAEL QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 150.00 0 TASCHUK, PAM QUARTERLY STIPEND PARK BOA 100.00 Total for Dept 452 975.00* 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 11.79 _66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM 5.90 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 264.82 O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM 2.14 O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 28 & SEPTEMBER 4 ENVIRONM 179.50 Total for Dept 461 464.15* 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 2.62 Date: 09/17/2002 -Time: 08:13:42 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 Dept INS SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 MEDICA • MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 Amount 1.31 58.85 .47 150.00 213.25* 11.79 5.89 264.82 2.14 284.64* 0 U. S. BANK TRUST NATIO TRUSTEE /EXPENSES - REVENUE DEBT SER 1,581.25 Total for Dept 470 1,581.25* 0 66114 0 66118 0 0 0 0 66125 0 0 66130 0 134 40 0 0 66142 C. W. HOULE, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN ROSKOWINSKI, MARY U S BANK U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, REPAIR VALVE BOXES MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS CHLORINE /SEAL RING /PHOSP PRINTING SERVICE WATER SAMPLES MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /AUG MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST COPPERHORN MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST LIFE INSURANCE REIMBURSE TELEPHONE EXPE TRAVEL /RENTAL / SUBSCRIPTI INSTALLATION WITCHER CONSTRUCTION C REIMBURSE WATER HYDRANT XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST Total for Dept 494 O ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, HOSE /CLAMP 66114 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O EAI ENGINEERING AMERIC UPPER CUTTER /SHIMS 66118 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES TELEVISE PIPE LINE 0 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERING SERVICE /SUNR O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT AUGUST SAC /SEPTEMBER SEW 66125 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /AUG 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 66135 ROTO- ROOTER PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 66140 U S BANK TRAVEL /RENTAL /SUBSCRIPTI 0 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT PARTS /SERVICE- GLADSTONE 66142 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER 2,497.20 935.13 43.23 21.36 5,098.48 161.72 77.00 463.65 13.26 51.32 1,290.22 54.90 11.42 78.25 205.00 26,229.89 125.00 1,959.43 39,316.46* 46.75 221.44 43.23 500.02 21.36 1,242.50 1,500.00 463.65 38,576.90 4.42 11.37 253.95 205.00 2,595.32 1,059.77 Date: 09/17/2002 Time: 08:13:42 Operator: JAL • Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 495 46,745.68* 0 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PAY -AS- YOU -GO CALCULATIO OTHER 250.00 0 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE OTHER 2,317.58 0 LITTLE TIKES COMM PLAY PLAY SYSTEM OTHER 9,345.98 0 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, IN DELIVER TOPSOIL OTHER 5,584.00 Total for Dept 499 17,497.56* 0 TWIN CITY FABRICATI, I REIMB TIF ESCROW /CLOSE S TWIN CIT 114.74 Total for Dept 517 114.74* Grand Total 277,093.93* Centennial Fire District Check Register 9/19/2002 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 9/17/2002 13398 9/17/2002 13399 9/17/2002 13400 9/17/2002 13401 9/17/2002 13402 9/17/2002 13403 9/17/2002 13404 9/17/2002 13405 9/17/2002 13406 9/17/2002 13407 9/17/2002 13408 9/17/2002 13409 9/17/2002 13410 9/17/2002 13411 9/17/2002 13412 9/17/2002 13413 9/17/2002 13414 9/17/2002 13415 9/17/2002 13416 9/17/2002 13417 9/17/2002 13418 9/17/2002 13419 9/17/2002 13420 • Amoco Oil Company Anoka - Technical College Armor Security Citgo Petroleum Corporation David Bruder Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Fire Instructors Assn. Of Minnesota Frattallone's Hardware J & E Small Engine Repair Kent M. Kogler Loffler Business Systems McLeod USA Orkin Exterminating Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Qwest Rivard Tailoring Tom Thumb Viking Office Products Xcel Energy Zep Manufacturing Company Photoworld Sam's Club Stock Building Supply 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42100 - Fuel and Lube 90.87 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 1,000.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 169.59 42100 - Fuel and Lube 117.71 42130 - Equipment Expense 100.19 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 5,377.85 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 180.94 42130 - Equipment Expense 54.18 42130 - Equipment Expense 14.88 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 185.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 16.74 42240 - Telephone 356.56 42110 - Other Maintenance 51.12 42270 - Breathing Air 203.32 42240 - Telephone 297.85 42120 - Uniform Expense 11.72 42100 - Fuel and Lube 33.12 42180 - Office Supplies 31.52 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 443.66 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 157.36 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 135.74 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 393.26 10105 - Garage Expense 2333.10 Total $11,756.28 • • • Agenda Item — 3A Staff Originator: Al Rolek, Director of Finance Date: September 23, 2002 Topic: Continuation of Public Hearing on Five -Year Financial Plan Votes Required: Simple Majority (3/5) Back arod The continuation of the public hearing on the 5 -year Financial Plan is scheduled for September 23. As you will recall, at the September 4, 2002 Council work session staff recommended tabling the issue to allow the plan to be updated consistent with the proposed 2003 budget and to extend the term of the plan to 2003 — 2007. It is staff's intention to update the 5 -year plan and present it to Council at a November work session with a public hearing to be scheduled in December. Staff's recommendation is that the Council continue the public hearing on the Five -year plan to December 9, 2002 with adoption of the plan either on December 9 or December 16. A notice of the public hearing will be posted and published prior to the hearing. OPTIONS 1. Continue the public hearing on the Five -year Financial Plan to December 9 2. Continue the public hearing on September 23 as scheduled 3. Table to October 14 and refer back to staff Recommendation Option 1. • • • STAFF MEMBER DATE SUBJECT VOTE REQUIRED AGENDA ITEM 4A Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration 23 September 2002 - -Set a Public Hearing for 15Y Reading of Ordinance No. 11 -02, Renewal of Cable Television Franchise -- Authorize Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 11 -02 3/5 for setting public hearing date 4/5 vote for Authorizing Summary Publication of Ordinance BACKGROUND The North Metro Telecommunication Commission has renegotiated a cable television franchise on behalf of member cities with ATT Broadband. As this franchise agreement is an ordinance, it will require a public hearing. I recommend that hearing be set for 6:45 p.m., 14 October 2002. As this is quite a lengthy document, staff is also recommending that a summary (prepared by our attorneys) be published in lieu of the entire document. Staffs research indicates this item is appropriate subject matter for the summary publication method. State law provides for the summary publication alternative; however, this requires a 4/5 vote of the Council. Staff requests that two separate actions be taken -- one to set the public hearing, and the second to authorize summary publication. OPTIONS 1. Set the public hearing for renewal of cable communication franchise agreement for 14 October at 6:45 p.m. and authorize summary publication of the ordinance. 2. Refer back to Staff. RECOMMENDATION Number One. J: \dtesch \Cable Commission\Franchise Renewal GS.doc • • • AGENDA ITEM 4 - B STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE September 23, 2002 TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No 02 - 125 Accepting Emergency lighting equipment as a Donation from Kieger Enterprises Incorporated. VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority ' BACKGROUND Kieger Enterprises Incorporated has graciously donated emergency lighting and siren equipment for use by the Public Safety Department. The purpose of Resolution 02 -125 is to accept and publicly thank Kieger Enterprises for their generous donation. ' OPTIONS II 1. Adopt Resolution No. 02 - 125 accepting the donation. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. 'RECOMMENDATION II Option No. 1 • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 125 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM KIEGER ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, WHEREAS, emergency lighting and siren equipment are needed equipment for public safety fleet, Kieger Enterprises Incorporated has made an offer to donate their miscellaneous emergency lighting and siren to the City of Lino Lakes, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do hereby accept the donation of this equipment and wishes to express its gratitude to Kieger Enterprises Incorporated for the donation. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-95 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE COUNTY OF ANOKA'S DESIGN FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF CSAH 49 WHEREAS, County State Aid Highway 49, between Lake Drive (CSAH 23) and County Road J, is located in the City of Lino Lakes and the County of Anoka, and WHEREAS, Anoka County plans to reconstruct the CSAH 49 bridge over Rice Creek, and the intersection of CSAH 10 (Birch Street) and CSAH 49, and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City and the County to reconstruct CSAH 49 from Lake Drive to County Road J at the same time the bridge and intersection are reconstructed, and WHEREAS, the City and County have discussed design issues for reconstruction of CSAH 49 for two years, and WHEREAS, Anoka County has proposed to construct the project in accordance with the following: a. Removal of the shoulder to narrow the overall street width; b. Reduction in the Right -of -way width to 100 feet; c. Removal of the median south of Birch Street in conjunction with a reduced speed limit (45 mph) through implementation of landscaping and streetscaping; and WHEREAS, the design will include context sensitive design elements that contribute to lower speed limits NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City of Lino Lakes accepts Anoka County's design for reconstructing CSAH 49. 2. The City of Lino Lakes is prepared to participate financially in providing context sensitive design elements of the reconstructed roadway. 3. The City of Lino Lakes urges Anoka County to include plans to reconstruct CSAH 49, the bridge over Rice Creek and the intersection of CSAH 10 (Birch Street) and CSAH 49 in the 2003 -2008 Highway Improvement Plan. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2002. ATTEST: Arm J. Blair, City Clerk • • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 5 - A STAFF ORIGINATOR David J Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE September 23,2002 TOPIC Joint Powers Agreement VOTED REQUIRED Simple Majority 'BACKGROUND I The Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council is proposing a new public safety communications system. The council along with the County, Cities and urban townships located within the County, have determined that there is a need to enhance the communication system. The parties have agreed to join together for the purpose of planning, implementing and maintaining a digital public safety communications system in the County of Anoka. This joint power agreement supports this partnership. 'OPTIONS II 1. Approve and sign. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. I I1 t 'RECOMMENDATION L 1. Approve and sign. ANOKA COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT This Joint Powers Agreement is by and between the County of Anoka, Minnesota, (the "County ") and the following cities and urban townships located within the County: Andover, Anoka, Bethel, Blaine, Burns, Circle Pines, Centerville, Columbia Heights, Columbus, Coon Rapids, East Bethel, Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Linwood, Oak Grove, Ramsey, St. Francis, and Spring Lake Park (each a "City" and collectively, the "Cities "). WHEREAS, the County and the Cities have previously recognized the need to cooperate in their law enforcement efforts, and have created the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council (the "JLEC ") for this purpose; and WHEREAS, the fire departments that serve Anoka County have created the Anoka County Fire Protection Council (FPC); and WHEREAS, the JLEC, the County and the Cities have determined that there is a need to communicate among fire departments and law enforcement agencies, to improve the speed and accuracy of fire and law enforcement information requested from another jurisdiction, and to work cooperatively in an effort to improve fire protection and law enforcement and thereby public safety in Anoka County; and • • • WHEREAS, the Cities, through the JLEC, and the County have determined that public safety communication would be improved by the development of a new public safety communications system; and WHEREAS, as a result of County efforts, the legislature passed legislation permitting the County to levy a separate tax on behalf of all governmental units in the County for this improved public safety communications system; and WHEREAS, it is important for these governmental units to understand the undertaking of the County and to provide for a continuation of the system. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein and in exercise of the power granted by Minn. Stat. §471.591, the parties to this Agreement do mutually agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The parties agree that they have joined together for the purpose of planning, implementing and maintaining a public safety communications system in the County of Anoka and to supplement a 1999 joint powers agreement. 2. TERM This Agreement shall be effective September 1, 2002, and continue until any party terminates, with or without cause, upon thirty days' written notice. The termination by any party shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as to the remaining parties. -2- • 3. PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION The County shall work with the JLEC to plan and construct a public safety communications system in Anoka County using the special law enacted on behalf of Anoka County to finance the system. 4. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County and shall conform to the requirements applicable to the County. 5. FUNDING LIMITATION It is understood by the parties that by this undertaking the County may bond up to 12.5 million dollars to obtain funds to plan and construct the public safety communications system. Any funds received from sources other than a tax levy will be applied to reduce the amount of bonds or notes necessary to repay bonds and will not act to increase the total expenditure. 6. DISTRIBUTION OF RADIOS • It is the intent of the parties to make a one -time distribution of radios to all fire departments and law enforcement agencies in the County. The radios will be purchased from the remaining funds available in the 12.5 million dollars after constructing the infrastructure of the system. The radios will be distributed as provided in Exhibit A, which is attached. It is understood by the parties that the Cities and their individual fire departments and law enforcement agencies are responsible for Metropolitan Radio Board user fees and acquisition and replacement of radios after this one -time provision of radios under this Agreement. -3- • 7 USE OF SHOP SPARES The parties agree that radios purchased as shop spares, as shown on Exhibit A, will be maintained by Anoka County Central Communications for the benefit of the parties hereto. These radios will be made available to the police and fire departments to substitute for a radio that is being repaired. Additionally, the radios will be available to police and fire departments for public safety situations such as disasters or large gatherings of people that need to be managed. The radios may be used for not longer than the time of repair or incident and, in any case, not longer than three months. There shall be no expense to the police and fire departments for this use provided, however, that the departments shall be responsible for any loss or damage to the shop spares radios they are using. 8. JOINT CONTRIBUTION AND ACQUISITION The parties agree that, acting through the JLEC, they may voluntarily contribute to a fund maintained by the County for purchase of public safety communication equipment or other law enforcement purpose. The County agrees to credit any interest earned and maintain the fund to be expended at the direction of the JLEC for the benefit of the contributing party. Contribution by a City may not be expended if a representative of that City appointed to the JLEC votes in the negative on a motion to expend such funds. 9. ACQUISITION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT The parties agree that it is important for the public safety communication system to operate as effectively as possible and that the acquisition and use of common equipment is important to that goal. In furtherance of that goal, the parties agree that they will acquire -4- • • • communication equipment through the Director of Central Communications in Anoka County. The County agrees that it will acquire such communication equipment at the lowest possible price and will not charge the party ordering the equipment any amount in excess of that necessary to its acquisition and delivery. The County further agrees that it will consider the recommendations of the JLEC and the FPC in determining whether the provision of the radios is by purchase or lease and whether the County will finance the acquisition costs. The parties agree that the County will act to preserve the ability of Cities to treat payments as debt service in order to maintain the ability to acquire public safety communication equipment outside any levy limit. 10. CENTRAL RECORDS PROJECT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT There are unexpended proceeds derived from the issuance, sale, and delivery of the County's General Obligation Capital Notes, Series 1999A (the "Series 1999ANotes "), in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,230,000, issued 011 January 6, 1999. The Series 1999A Notes were issued by the County pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners on December 15, 1998. The Series 1999A Notes were issued to benefit joint law enforcement efforts of the County and multiple municipalities located with the County (the "Cities ") through the coordination of criminal justice records systems of the County and the Cities to more efficiently store and access law enforcement information requested by the Cities and the County (the "Project "). In December 1998, the County and the Cities, pursuant to a Joint Powers Agreement under Anoka County Contract No. 990021 (the "1999 Joint Powers Agreement ") provided -5- • • for the cooperation and respective duties of the County and the Cities in funding and maintaining the Project. The 1999 Joint Powers Agreement also dealt with specific costs associated with performing parts of the Project. The JLEC is hereby directed to use the unexpended proceeds of the Series 1999A Notes in a manner consistent with the general goals of the Project. The unexpended proceeds of the Series 1999A Notes may be expended, consistently with Minnesota Statutes, Section 373.01, subdivision 3, as amended, at the direction of the JLEC, in consultation with bond counsel for the County, so as to not affect the tax - exempt status of the Series 1999A Notes. 11. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS AND PROPERTY All funds disbursed by any party pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed pursuant to the method provided by law for counties and the Division Manager of Anoka County Finance & Central Services shall be the fiscal agent. Upon termination, all infrastructure shall be the property of the County and all radios shall be the property of the governmental units receiving the radios. Any funds held by the County as the result of contributions under Paragraph 8 shall be returned to the party contributing the funds. 12. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by any party. -6- • 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Joint Powers Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties on the matter related hereto. The Agreement shall not be altered or amended, except by agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the dates below: ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF By: By: Dan Erhart, Chair Anoka County Board of Commissioners Dated: , 2002 Dated: , 2002 Attest: Attest: John "Jay" McLinden Anoka County Administrator -7- • • EXHIBIT A The following page entitled "Radio Allocations - Police" and "Radio Allocations - Fire" is the relative allocation of available dollars to the departments identified for the purchase of radios. It is understood: 1. The final allocation of dollars will not be exactly as shown on the chart. The dollars allocated to radios will be the amount remaining after the infrastructure of the radio system is known. The remaining amount will be first allocated between fire, police and shop spares as follows: Fire $922,263 38.50% Police $1,323,163 55.24% Shop spares $150,000 6.26% After this allocation, the amount for fire radios and police radios will be allocated to the departments in proportion to the amounts shown. 2. Each department, using the dollars allocated to them, will identify, from a list maintained by Anoka County Central Communications, the type and level of radio they intend to acquire. Anoka County will then purchase the radios as requested from funds remaining after the construction of the infrastructure of the system. • RADIO ALLOCATIONS - POLICE ACSO 313,897 23.72% ANOKA 95,995 7.25% BLAINE 176,617 13.35% CENTENNIAL LAKE 70,217 5.31% COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 93,511 7.07% COON RAPIDS 208,459 15.75% FRIDLEY 136,720 10.33% LINO LAKES 78,765 5.95% RAMSEY 76,281 5.77% SPRING LAKE PARK 41,553 3.14% ST. FRANCIS 31,148 2.35% TOTAL $1,323,163 RADIO ALLOCATIONS - FIRE ANDOVER 82,765 8.97% ANOKA/CHAMPLIN 56,230 6.10% BETHEL 35,353 3.83% CENTENNIAL LAKE 78,424 8.50% COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 47,481 5.15% COON RAPIDS 101,651 11.02% EAST BETHEL 45,825 4.97% FRIDLEY 76,634 8.31% HAM LAKE 53,679 5.82% LEXINGTON 3 7, 971 4.12% LINWOOD 45,825 4.97% OAK GROVE 48,443 5.25% RAMSEY 54,304 5.89% SBM 114,471 12.41% ST. FRANCIS 43,207 4.68% TOTAL $922,263 AGENDA ITEM 5 - D STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia, Chief of Police Public Safety Director DATE September 23, 2002 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED r, II L Crime Prevention Month 2002 Resolution No. 02 -123 Simple Majority Crime prevention month was designed to heighten crime prevention awareness, generate support and participation in local anticrime efforts among civic groups, schools, faith communities, businesses, and individuals as they help to nurture communal responsibility and instill pride throughout the City of Lino Lakes. Staff is requesting that council acknowledge and read the attached proclamation in our support of designating the month of October 2002 as Crime Prevention Month in the City of Lino Lakes and approve Resolution No. 02 -123. 'OPTIONS I 1. Motion to approve 2. Motion to deny r 'RECOMMENDATION L it OPTION 1 - Approve support of Crime Prevention Month and adopt Resolution No. 02 -123. • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02 -123 RESOLUTION PROCLAMING OCTOBER 2002 CRIME PREVENTION MONTH: WHEREAS, the vitality of our city depends on how safe we keep our homes, neighborhoods, workplaces, and communities because crime and fear diminish the quality of life for all; WHEREAS, crime and fear of crime destroy our trust in others and in institutions, threatening the community's health and prosperity; WHEREAS, people of all ages must be made aware of what they can do to prevent themselves, their families, neighbors, and co- workers from being harmed by drugs, violence, and other crime; WHEREAS, the personal injury, financial loss, and community deterioration resulting from crime are intolerable and require action by the whole community; WHEREAS, crime prevention initiatives must include but go beyond self protection and security to promote collaborative efforts to make neighborhoods safer for all ages and to develop positive educational and recreational opportunities for young people; WHEREAS, adults must invest time, resources, and police support in effective prevention and intervention strategies for youth, and teens must be engaged in driving crime from their communities; WHEREAS, effective crime prevention programs excel because of partnerships among law enforcement, other government agencies, civic groups, schools, faith communities, businesses, and individuals as they help to nurture communal responsibility and instill pride; NOW, THEREFORE, We, the Lino Lakes City Councilmembers, do hereby proclaim October 2002 as Crime Prevention Month in Lino Lakes and urge all citizens, government agencies, public and private institutions, and businesses to recognize the power of prevention and work together for the common good. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 5 - E STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 02 -126 Accepting U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Making Officer Redeployment Effective (MORE) Grant VOTES REQUIRED: 3/5 vote !BACKGROUND The Lino Lakes Police Department has been selected to receive grant funds in the amount of $12,863.00 to purchase hardware and software that will allow the department to continue its expansion into the area of making information more easily accessible to officers while in their squad cars. We are asking the City Council to accept this grant on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes and the Lino Lakes Police Department. The City's matching funds /local share is 250 which was included in the budget process. 'OPTIONS 1 1. Adopt Resolution No. 02 -126 accepting the grant funds to purchase the needed hardware and software through the COPS Making Officer Redeployment Effective (MORE) grant. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. 'RECOMMENDATION II Option No. 1 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 126 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT Be it resolved that the City of Lino Lakes enter into a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Making Officer Redeployment Effective (MORE) Grant Program - to purchase needed hardware and software that will allow the department to continue its expansion into the area of making information more easily accessible to officers while in their squad cars. David J. Pecchia, Chief of Police is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, approve Resolution No. 02 - 126. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • AGENDA ITEM 5 - F STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia, Chief of Police Public Safety Director DATE September 23, 2002 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED r, BACKGROUND Domestic Violence Awareness Month Resolution No. 02 -124 Simple Majority Staff is requesting that council acknowledge and read the attached proclamation in our support of designating the month of October 2002 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the City of Lino Lakes, and adopt the attached Resolution No. 02 -124. • 'OPTIONS II 1. Motion to approve 2. Motion to deny 'RECOMMENDATION I' OPTION 1 - Approve support of Domestic Violence Awareness Month and adopt Resolution No. 02 -124. • • Fire Prevention Week October 6 12, 2002 PROCLAMATION City of Lino Lakes Resolution No. 02 -128 Whereas Fire kills 3,500 to 4,000 people in the United States each year and 80 to 85% of all fire deaths occur in the home; and Whereas Taking simple safety precautions, such as identifying and removing everyday home fire hazards, can help prevent the majority of home fires and home fire deaths; and Whereas Proper installation, testing and maintenance of smoke alarms are part of a system of fire protection; and Whereas Developing a home fire escape plan, with two ways out of each room and an outside meeting place, and practicing it twice a year with every member of the household, are critical to escaping a fire safely; and Whereas The nonprofit NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) has been the official sponsor of Fire Prevention Week for 80 years, the 2002 Fire Prevention Week theme, "Team Up for Fire Safety," motivates children and families to work together to conduct a home hazard hunt, develop and practice a home fire escape plan, and install and test smoke alarms; and Whereas NFPA dedicates "Team Up for Fire Safety" to the hundreds of firefighters who so valiantly gave their lives to save others in 2001, especially on September 11; and Whereas The Centennial Fire Department is committed to the safety of life and property from the devastating effects of fire; and Whereas The members of the fire service are joined by other concerned citizens of Lino Lakes, as well as other emergency service providers and safety advocates, businesses, schools, service clubs, and organizations in their fire safety efforts; I, John Bergeson, Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes, do hereby proclaim the week of October 6 -12, 2002, as Fire Prevention Week. This week commemorates the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, which killed more than 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings, and serves as the motivating force to bring the people of Lino Lakes together to build a safer community. I call upon the people of Lino Lakes to "Team Up for Fire Safety" by participating in fire prevention activities at home, work and school, and taking the steps needed to make their homes and families safe from fire. In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand this 23`d day of September, the year of two thousand and two. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor .AIkaa.. s s F Proclamation Resolution No. 02 - 12'/ October of 2002 is proclaimed As Domestic Violence Awareness Month WHEREAS, the community problem of domestic violence has become a critical public health and welfare concern in Anoka County; and WHEREAS, domestic violence is a crime, the commission of which will not be tolerated in Anoka County and perpetrators of said crime are subject to prosecution and conviction in accordance with the law; and WHEREAS, over 50,000 women and children have and will continue to access assistance from Alexandra House, Inc., a domestic violence service provider; and WHEREAS, domestic violence will be eliminated through community partnerships of concerned individuals and organizations working together to prevent abuse while at the same time effecting social and legal change; and WHEREAS, October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month; and WHEREAS, During National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, Anoka County organizations will inform area residents about domestic violence, its prevalence, consequences and what we, as a concerned community can do to eliminate its existence. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND KNOWN TO ALL that C,11 aT 1,410 &a K.c r proclaims October to be Domestic Violence Awareness Month on ate wt b.cr 13 , 2 oo 2.. • 014 a j tivj STAFF ORIGINATOR: C.C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7A Tanda Gretz September 23, 2002 Public Hearing & First Reading: Ordinance No. 09 =02 Vacation of Drainage/Utility Easement For property located at 6763 Timberwolf Trail Theodore S. Brausen ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Theodore Brausen is applying for the Vacation of a drainage and utility easement on his property. Mr. Brausen, who lives at 6763 Timberwolf Trail, has purchased the adjacent lot to the south of his home, and has combined the two lots into one tax parcel with a single PIN. He would now like to vacate the drainage and utility easements which exist on either side of the line between the two original lots. Mr. Brausen has constructed a pool and, although the pool is not itself sited on the easements, other pool utility areas will be. This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1.) General Location Map 2.) Easement Vacation Exhibit, dated 8 -6 -02 by Loucks Associates City Council Meeting Brausen Vacation September 23, 2002 ANALYSIS The subject drainage and utility easement exists as two standard five -foot side yard drainage and utility easements, one on Lot 4 and one on Lot 3. Since the two five -foot easements are on adjacent lots, the combined easement area measures approximately 10'X144.' City engineer Jim Studenski has reviewed this application and reports that there are no utilities or storm sewers located in the easement area. As a result, there should be no negative impact to vacating the easement area. CONCLUSION This is a request for the Vacation of two standard five -foot side yard drainage and utility easements. Since the two properties have now been combined into a single tax parcel with one PIN, and there are no utilities or storm sewers sited in the easement area, it is appropriate to vacate the easement. OPTIONS 1.) Approval of the Vacation: Ordinance No. 09 -02. 2.) Denial of the Vacation. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1. 2 • CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 09-02 ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOT 3 & LOT 4, BLOCK 1, PHEASANT HILLS 9T (BRAUSEN PROPERTY) WHEREAS, the City Council of Lino Lakes has determined to vacate the drainage and utility easement existing between Lot 3 & Lot 4, Block 1, Pheasant Hills 9th Addition; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 23, 2002 before the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers after due published and posted notice had been given on September 3rd, 2002, and a reasonable attempt was made to give personal notice to all affected property owners, and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, it appears to be in the best interests of the City to vacate such easement; and NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES ORDAINS: Section 1. That the drainage and utility easement existing between Lot 3 & Lot 4, Block 1, Pheasant Hills 9th Addition, as dedicated on the Plat of Pheasant Hills 9th Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, as described in Attachment A, is hereby vacated. Section 2. That any person, corporation or city owning or controlling easements contained upon the property vacated reserves the right to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto: Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter. ATTACHMENT A That part of the 10.00 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes as dedicated along the common line between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Pheasant Hills Preserve 9th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of a line 10.00 feet westerly of and parallel with the easterly lines of said Lots 3 and 4 and which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at southwest corner of said Lot 3; thence easterly on an assumed bearing of North 86 degrees 51 minutes 17 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 3, a distance of 20.63 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 17 degrees 21 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 152.07 feet and said line there terminating. 9s it'S, °w. altattlikt 4rtRil 416rgifi a O ©$, a t4 � O , eat" BM cm ham Mlia RA VI ..., Qg mmo •L EXHIBIT # 10 ER/ ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT N0.11 23 Le " 1113 711711:14.9 n :10�.p ©00 Waa• j o•:o C:11 L® *Ef Asho %J O.LA• 2ND i, 7yy nr a� BRARDYWDOD ESTATES 0 9 B 7 6 3 4 3 11 a:c.13S'Ya:1 ® 12 W © w ©BRAN•YWJ0�1 MEM L. 0 10 9 8 7 6 3 4 KARTH CANFlELD ROAD BIRCH STREET 7 6 1 COURT OF PART L DIVISION L OF SEiC'S 341 35 T. 3t- R22 0 O C - +' O — • - .0 •- O M•• C 0 .0 WO a p W al •• W • W O- s o+m•- O L N W.+ C .0 C W a •.- Z O W c 0 O Ot) .c0O 1 • N- .. 0 .- �a -- O HO •- ,O C - a O- E W 00 L C 3O - .- o. .... ••••• ` >•- 0 .- 0 f >. 0 4, 4, o N O 0 •-• m— N a O+I\ 0 W '0 O U • U . W W L C = Q W a - e} O�w C O C W a - 0 O •- � a- c C o f - Ot ▪ c -a L C O c � aaZ 70 •ONO• -. .- L Of . a - •- • 0 0'0 0,0 a .• W O- ^ yO - U O . N N 30 1- 0 ac mZ - - o L 0 •.0 a W > O M- O a UM W c a O • C W G) - U O E o E L 0 y • L E I "o c L •. - mn • a 10 0 0 W ++ W O '- 00 Q- W W L in a J • t^ c.•W • - 0 O C >+ ON O O a W F W : r' C - •U - • t O W . .. W a W .•C W ▪ O N • W •- -' N W O Oa • . _ > 3 c L. 0. -- CA 3 ... 0: •- .. C cw r.- C � •-• W .0 p L""2 Q - WW• -a UO v W -.0 V y•-• Waw d L Co _ W o E U W •- W 0 >. W W ▪ Wc f a -- C 0 W — L 3 C o •0 - c O r • . r. L LA •- + +• a O . — N W .- LO .0 0 — a O. d W W 0 a J .0 N olL C J a • N 0, O W .0 W W al L a W O 00• O C- W C W W +• W a a C OSa W a0 - L o•.- O O 7a • O•- C L E t„ O C W a.0 c O W EF 0- CL L nrn0Z u a r).0 W U a M - O 0 O t . . ) W C E - E C N c 3 W W _ Q L 0 0 - - W O 0 _ 0"-'03....1-NZ o 0 0 1 1 • 1 0. . . . . •- E.0 •C 2 .c .0 •.- O 0 . -0 L ... O..+ 3 0 . 1 . . . - 0 0 0 z N 0 W a V O Q �\ �� \ :47 `1ss o � o \ .0 41I I I o � .0 Z Z n \ hA / frill O U ~W JN \\ ■ 4 may/ I 1 Z Q -i TF- \ J \ Z ~tn W�. Off/ y I I to ui A W \ / i i,, aii Ni / o /� v' ,P. n� Y n o D9'r9 =i s a�WO m �. C'! v ''a /'L6 ..ZZ.46.09m, _ -S z, c ��. z1 I ..'' Z / r„ ‘ IA. to &�5 ) i1- it' Wri WH cy '� "' I I 1 '‘--,..._$1"0, �ti nn •i Z v �m I OZS / /G, ° s. tj w < w 01 J ~O I 'L\NE ri 6g& / ; z 1.s�co�mn S tVE \ _ _ / - a\��'` h/ '� :`a��— to � 1521 �•• � N td _`O\ ^0 / wry' Z k • /// 1 o •< — • �. N''' N\7�2t`•W E \A EMENT'� / / // \T �L? ! 51-".- / 255.28 OW & of ..,c/o- ..,..c SL 0 O ED`A of 9TH PD c0i 1. 6 PaESER '^ of .) V> J• 11 0 q rj 0 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C.C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7B Tanda Gretz September 23, 2002 Resolution No. 02 -115 Minor Subdivision For property located at 82XX West Rondeau Lake Road Laraine Cardarelli & Craig Severson ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote • BACKGROUND Ms. Cardarelli and Mr. Severson are applying for a Minor Subdivision of approximately 32 acres of land, zoned Rural, on the 82XX block of West Rondeau Lake Road. The applicant would like to create two lots: one lot of 21.69 acres and one lot of 10.43 acres. This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1.) General Location Map 2.) Certificate of Survey, dated July 17, 2002. ANALYSIS The attached Certificate of Survey shows the proposed division of the 32 -acre parcel. Parcel A, 21.69 acres, contains 22 % upland. Parcel B, 10.43 acres, does not have upland delineated on the survey, but as aerial photos show the land to have been in agriculture (and now in pasture), meeting the 20% minimum upland requirement does not appear to be an issue. • City Council Meeting Cardarelli/Severson Minor Subdivision September 23, 2002 Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Rural Land Use Rural West Low Density, Unsewered Residential & Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural North Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural East Rural Land Use Rural South Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural. Minimum Lot Requirements Size: the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is ten acres. Both of the two proposed lots will meet this requirement. Width: the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone is 330 feet, and both lots meet this requirement. In addition, both lots will have full frontage on a road, as required under the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance, Section 1008.08, subdiv. 6, which states that "all lots shall abut for their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street." Easements and Right -of -Way All created lots are required to include drainage and utility easements. The applicant will need to dedicate drainage and utility easements to the City in accordance with Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 4. Such easements shall be five feet in width along side property lines, ten feet in width along front and rear property lines, and cover all ponding and wetland areas. In addition, street right -of -way dedication will be required according to the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance Section 1001.08, subdiv. 10. Lastly, it should be noted as a point of information that there is an existing 30 -foot easement between the proposed parcels that serves as a driveway to an existing lot of record ( "Parcel C ") that lies between the two proposed lots on their southern boundary. This easement is not held by the City, but presumably exists solely for access purposes for Parcel C. Buildable Area Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.2.b states that parcels located within a zoning district that carries a minimum lot size of 10 acres must have a minimum of 20% buildable /upland area. Both of the proposed lots meet this requirement. 2 City Council Meeting Cardarelli/Severson Minor Subdivision September 23, 2002 • Septic Issues • • Soils tests confirm that there are soils on both the proposed parcels capable of accommodating a septic system, with enough room for both primary and secondary sites. P & Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the September 11, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision, with the conditions noted by staff CONCLUSION The proposed Minor Subdivision would result in two lots: Parcel A of 21.69 acres and Parcel B of 10.43 acres. Both proposed lots would meet all minimum lot requirements, as established under the Lino Lakes City Code. As a result, staff would recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision with the following conditions: 1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665 to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in width along side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney, to be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 3.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City a 33 -foot wide permanent public right - of -way adjacent to West Rondeau Lake Road. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney, to be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. OPTIONS 1.) Approval of the Minor Subdivision with conditions: Resolution No. 02 -115. 2.) Denial of the Minor Subdivision. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-115 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 82XX WEST RONDEAU LAKE ROAD (LARAINE CARDARELLI & CRAIG SEVERSON PROPERTY) (see attached legal description) WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Minor Subdivision of property, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish requirements Minor Subdivisions, and WHEREAS, the proposed Minor Subdivision would result in the creation of property in conformance with the above - stated ordinance and regulations, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council approves the proposed Minor Subdivision as described by the attached document entitled "Certificate of Survey for Laraine Cardarelli & Craig Severson" by Blake L. Rivard, Land Surveyor, dated July 17, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665 to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in width along side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney, to be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 3.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City a 33 -foot wide permanent public right -of -way adjacent to West Rondeau Lake Road. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City attorney, to be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of —, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTACHMENT A PROPOSED PARCEL A: The west 970.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota EXCEPT the north 330.00 feet of the west 330.00 feet thereof AND EXCEPT the south 250.00 feet of the west 430.00 feet thereof AND EXCEPT the south 400.00 feet of the east 275.00 feet of the west 970.00 feet thereof. This parcel is subject to a roadway easement over the east 30.00 feet thereof and is also subject to the right of way of Rondeau Lake Road and other easements of record, if any. PROPOSED PARCEL B: All that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota which lies east of the west 970.00 feet thereof. This parcel is subject to the right of way of Rondeau Lake Road and other easements of record, if any. EXISTING PARCEL C: The South 400 feet of the east 275 feet of the west 970 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 31, North of Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with an easement for road purposes over that part of east 30 feet of the west 970 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 lying north of the south 400 feet thereof. • 1 4 3 1 EXHIBIT # / TAPE- AID - HIGHWAY -- H0.14 0 .���t =,i�ilt0etai 1 .41114!;, 4 �lillii rPi I 1 tl! ii ht rj� : r..ie a.! I., ;II Iliqraiiiilawin4.41111, 11 Iii 11111111111111114151111111111411111 ti ;i gi:klhiai ilil ��lil,iil1ilie Ty -o6Zr z 0 ,r• a 4`�iww 0I R O 0 0 0c2arr 90106 1!! r.L r.9i.TO6 w a i t smsp.rar ! JON' WOO, A =a aemr / 1"."' prom arse er rmv 097164 — — sts es iox nouo a °®z f600, .roe Z Met TON LB•99Z if I� I gab ` =tea Ali :la lahr itt 0 1 aai id 1 • AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz C.C. MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution No. 02 -116 Variance to allow a detached accessory structure closer to the front lot line than the principle building, for property located at 8065 Wood Duck Trail Michael & Laura Sullivan ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Michael and Laura Sullivan reside at 8065 Wood Duck Trail, a 2.89 acre lot that is zoned Rural. The Sullivans have applied for a Variance in order that they may locate a detached garage closer to the front lot line than the principle building. Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.1.c of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that "no detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principal building or its attached garage." This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1. General Location Map 2. Plan of the Sullivan Property, dated January 25, 2002 3. Narrative from the Sullivans ANALYSIS Lot Requirements The Sullivans home is sited 98 feet back from Wood Duck Trail. Wood Duck Trail is classed as a minor collector street, which has a setback requirement of 40 feet. City Council Meeting Sullivan Variance September 23, 2002 The property currently does not have a garage on site, although there are two small utility sheds. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, Section 5, subdiv. 1.C.3, states "all dwellings shall have a double garage." Further, Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.1.c states "no detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principle building or its attached garage." Lastly, Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.8.d allows for 3,600 sq.ft. of accessory buildings, and up to two detached accessory buildings for a property of this size and zone. Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Zoning Site Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural West Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural North Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural East Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural South Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural Site Constraints To satisfy ordinance requirements, a detached garage would have to be parallel with, or behind, the front line of the house. This is problematic on this site for three reasons. First, the septic drain field is located approximately 24 feet to the south of the house, with the septic tank located southeast of the house approximately the same distance. Second, the well is located to the north of the house approximately 25 feet. Thirdly, there is a pond located to the northwest of the house, directly in back of the current shed location. Each of these features act to preclude locating a garage in what would be a typical location next to, or behind, the house. As a result, the applicant is asking to be allowed to site a garage in a location to the side of, but in front of, the house. Such a site would put the garage closer to the street than the house, and thus violate Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.1.c of the City Zoning Ordinance. Such a location, however, would meet the required 40 -foot setback requirement from Wood Duck Lane. In addition, such a location would allow for the construction of a double garage, which the site currently does not have, but is a building requirement for properties located in the Rural zone. Lastly, a 24' X 36' detached garage would be 2 City Council Meeting Sullivan Variance September 23, 2002 within the allowable size and number of accessory building allowed on a lot of this size and zone, if one of the small sheds is taken down. Lastly, as a point of information, it should be noted that at least one neighboring property contains a garage which is sited closer to the street (8025 Wood Duck Trail). VARIANCE - FINDINGS OF FACT The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that "in considering all requests for variance or appeal, and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a fording of fact: 1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Comment: the property as a whole may be put to reasonable use, but official controls preclude the construction of a garage (which is a requirement under the Zoning Ordinance) in the only workable location that is near the house. 2.) That the plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner. Comment: The physical location of the septic tank, drain field, well and pond preclude siting a garage in a location which would satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Such a configuration of elements presents a situation unique to this property, although this situation was — at least in part — created by the (previous) landowner. 3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone, and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Comment: The demonstrated hardship is the lack of a garage site that would satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Such a hardship is not economically motivated but, rather, site driven. While such a hardship still allows for the reasonable use of the property, such a hardship does not allow the property to comply with the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance, which states that all dwellings in a Rural zone should have a double garage.. 4.) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Comment: There is no special privilege involved but, rather, a need/hardship that is site - driven. Other properties with similar site constraints would also be valid candidates for a Variance such as this one. City Council Meeting Sullivan Variance September 23, 2002 5.) That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Comment: The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that a double garage is a building requirement for property located in the Rural zone. Granting this Variance would allow the applicants to comply with this requirement. P & Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the September 11, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Variance, with the conditions noted below. CONCLUSION This application for a Variance is driven by three site constraints: location of a septic system, well, and a pond. Each of these constraints prevent siting the proposed garage in a location next to, or behind, the house, in compliance with the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. As a result, staff feels there is a demonstrated need/hardship that is site- driven and quantifiable, and so justifiable. Staff would recommend approval of the proposed Variance with the following conditions: 1.) The proposed garage be placed no closer than 62 feet from Wood Duck Trail, as shown on site plans submitted by the applicant. 2.) One of the two existing utility sheds is to be removed, so that the site will contain no more than two detached accessory buildings, as allowed under City Ordinance. OPTIONS 1.) Approval of the Variance, with conditions: Resolution No. 02 -116. 2.) Denial of the Variance. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-116 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8065 WOOD DUCK TRAIL (SULLIVAN PROPERTY) WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Variance to allow the construction of an detached 24' X 36' garage closer to the front lot line than the principle building, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance, Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.1.c, states that no detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principal building or its attached garage, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Comment: the property as a whole may be put to reasonable use, but official controls preclude the construction of a garage (which is a requirement under the Zoning Ordinance) in the only workable location that is near the house. 2.) That the plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner. Comment: The physical location of the septic tank drain field, well and pond preclude siting a garage in a location which would satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Such a configuration of elements presents a situation unique to this property, although this situation was — at least in part — created by the (previous) landowner. 3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone, and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Comment: The demonstrated hardship is the lack of a garage site that would satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Such a hardship is not economically motivated but, rather, site driven. While such a hardship still allows for the reasonable use of the property, such a hardship does not allow the property to comply with the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance, which states that all dwellings in a Rural zone should have a double garage.. 4.) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Comment: There is no special privilege involved but, rather, a need/hardship that is site - driven. Other properties with similar site constraints would also be valid candidates for a Variance such as this one. 5.) That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Comment: The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that a double garage is a building requirement for property located in the Rural zone. Granting this Variance would allow the applicants to comply with this requirement. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council approves the proposed Variance, as described by the attached document submitted by Michael & Laura Sullivan, dated as received on August 12, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1.) The proposed garage be placed no closer than 62 feet from Wood Duck Trail, as shown on site plans submitted by the applicant. 2.) One of the two existing utility sheds is to be removed, so that the site will contain no more than two detached accessory buildings, as allowed under City Ordinance. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of —, 2002. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk \T( • • I /3 Psilitiiiii !lit. Itifij II. inf. si r 111 E. • 6 —GAUNTY / /WY —R16YF 1OF 7 • laud 1 IIIII •W AI PCP MI MOW /6 ° 1!1.1_1■ Y ice= 5 5 6 Flu EXHIBIT # 1 Di ri Ell El 111 tralMff 1111 41.1k 'W SU\ ,UIVIgi 2 \\ \\ 01ANE 13 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Nkomo. SUS'/V/S!U/ &Nay vW mil r/iivairr iiiiwirazi aritiratit T 1111 Rey o rarz u o 9 r-- ���,,pps e� IS 2 wow o ' L / P 3sA /6 '+ a z � TWIL < T. Q� ME DOIYS®0 2 �q c I vo ®O ©'P411ti+'s °m zo 21 ���� f'LJ0 ILL dbnaccur....:.:rottri urF.f le © m© ©� ©�� arms c O4,A� x1d•�. 0 1 r � e LP / B 1, 2 3 4 5 6� 1 8 9 10 11 12 / N IS ®A 1 }} 35 34 3 32 31 loo �4 1 10 9 II 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1.0 11 12 12 s -� .:;:.;::;::.<;:<::.::::::< >: ° »; LAK E VIEW it 15 - _ •.. z TT�� -. ... ,.. .�, ..n /Sa OAK � �v A• l . 9'IGS� �••� p ill-K � 4 4) 12 36 s 6 2 3 1 SNERw•0D LN MO/000 3 RE 4 5 8AR6..RA LAN w 2.— 0 co o 0Q O O CAINE 8c ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS A SUBSIDIARY OF RLK— KUUSISTO,' LTD. 1321 Andover Blvd. N.E.Sutte 114 — Ham Minnesota 55304 763- 434 -7646 FEMA REPORT FOR: Michael and Laura Sullivan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The north 300.00 feet of the south 1025.00 feet of the west 420.00 feet of the eost 840.00 feet as measured along the east and south Ines thereof, of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter, Section 5, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. S 89°14'03 "E 420.00 z a; ZONE N 16.2 ^f5 e Shed FI .4906.2 LAG =907.9 Base F1=906.5 98± iblyjIIitr ZONE C 420.00 N 89°14'03 "W 9 S. Line of the E1/2 of the SW1 /4 of Sec. 5, T. 31, R. 22 420.00 SCALE: 1 INCH a 50 FEET. —FEMA — DENOTES EXISTING ZONE A BOUNDARY PER FEMA FIRM MAP PANEL. BEARINGS SHORN ARE ASSUMED. FFE =910.3 840.90 N 89 °14 03 "W 420.00 `1 ; n I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE Jam+ ZL , REG NO. 13072 Job No. 2002 -081 —L Sec. 5, T. 31, R. 22 .,q.'cietie.<4 &eil&a/n/ ( J e ) Z f rail August 12, 2002 To whom it may concern, EXHIBIT # 3 We are writing in request of a variance concerning the placement of a two -car garage that we wish to build on our property at 8065 Wood Duck Trail in Lino - Lakes. Due to the position of our home on our lot, it is necessary to build the garage closer to the road than the home. There are several conditions that prevent us from building our home anywhere else. First, sixty feet behind our home is a large pond. The land between the home and the pond slopes down into the pond. As a result that area floods often times in the spring. Second, in the ground on the north side of our home is our well. We had considered this option only to find that if there was ever a problem with our well, we would have to go through the top of the roof of the garage to work on it. Finally, one the south side of our home is our septic field. In order to maintain an efficient septic system we must not place any excessive weight onto the septic field and holding tank. This only leaves us with one option, which is to place the garage in front of our home closer to the street. We have noticed that a few of the homes in the neighborhood have remedied similar problems with this same solution. Please consider our request for variance. We thank you for you time. Sincerely, CleS) QF L AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz C. C. MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Minor Subdivision & Variance For property located at 855 Ash Street Don & Faith Lindahl ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Don and Faith Lindahl own 11 acres of land, zoned Rural, at 855 Ash Street. The Lindahls have applied for a Minor Subdivision and Variance from the minimum lot width requirements in order to subdivided their property. Although the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is 10 acres, the Lindahls are seeking to create a 10 -acre and a one -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, subd. 3.A.2.b.2 of the Lino Lakes City Code: "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten acres, or is serviced by public sewer, and it can be demonstrated by means satisfactory to the City that the division will not result in ground water, soil or other contamination which may endanger the public health." The Lindahls propose to live on the one -acre parcel containing the residence and outbuildings, and sell the remaining ten -acre parcel to their son. It should be noted that the existing 11 -acre parcel was created in 1997 as part of a minor subdivision of 58.76 acres. Minutes from the meetings of both the Planning & Zoning Board and the City Council note that a further subdivision of the 11 -acre parcel, such as is now being proposed, was discussed at that time. Minutes note that the applicant "had City Council Meeting Lindahl Minor Subdivision & Variance September 23, 2002 been advised that splitting off one acre with the homestead to provide an additional building site would probably not be recommended in this case." This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1. General Location Map 2. Minutes from November 24, 1997 City Council meeting 3. Minutes from November 12, 1997 Planning & Zoning meeting 4. Certificate of Survey, dated July 10, 2002 5. "Marked Up" Certificate of Survey, dated December 8, 1997 ANALYSIS The attached Certificate of Survey shows the proposed division of the 11 -acre parcel. Tract B, one acre, contains the Lindahl home and outbuildings, of which .89 acres are upland; Tract A, ten acres, contains the balance of the property, of which four acres are upland. Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural West 44 Rural North Rural East Rural South (North Oaks) (North Oaks) Minimum Lot Requirements Size: the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is ten acres. The proposed newly created lot would meet this requirement, with the balance of the property consisting of the one -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, subd.3.A.2.b.2. Width: the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone is 330 feet. Lot width is defined as "the horizontal distance between the side lot line of a lot measured at the building setback line and parallel to the front lot line." Additionally, the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance, Section 1001.08, subdiv. 6, requires that "all lots shall abut for their full frontage on a publically dedicated street." Tract B at 155 feet, does not meet the minimum lot width requirement, and, as a result, the applicant is asking for a Variance. With less than the required 330' of lot width, then, Tract B also does not fulfill the requirement of having full frontage on a road. 2 City Council Meeting Lindahl Minor Subdivision&, Variance September 23, 2002 Tract A is an irregularly shaped ( "C- shaped ") lot that meets the minimum lot width requirements, although it is not contiguous width/road frontage. Rather, the lot wraps around the one acre parcel, with 269 feet to the west of the one acre parcel and 188 feet to the east of the one acre parcel. Buildable Area Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.1.b requires parcels requiring a minimum of 10 acres or more to have a minimum of 20% upland area. Both parcels meet this requirement: the 10 -acre parcel has four acres of upland, although this upland exists as "islands" among wetland area, and the one acre parcel is almost entirely composed of upland. Septic Issues Soils tests confirm that the proposed 10 -acre parcel is capable of accommodating a septic system. In addition, there is adequate room for both primary and secondary sites. The one -acre parcel already contains a septic system, with adequate room for a secondary site. Access Issues The existing 11 -acre parcel contains a second driveway, not used by the Lindahls but existing on their property, that is the sole source of access for the neighboring property to the west, at 815 Ash Street. Without this driveway, the property at 815 would be landlocked, with no access out to Ash Street or any other road. The minor subdivision approved in 1997, which created the parcels at 815 and 855 Ash Street, required an easement agreement be drawn up for the driveway. This agreement was approved by the City attorney and recorded with Anoka County. In addition, as a further condition of approval, the driveway was approved by the Fire Chief. The driveway is currently used primarily by the residents at 815 Ash Street, as the Lindahls have their own access drive. Further subdivision of the 11 -acre parcel would require shared use of this driveway, which may or may not pose a legal issue: the easement agreement states the easement is "for the exclusive benefit of Tracts B (855 Ash Street) and C (815 Ash Street)." Further, the agreement states that "no party may unreasonably increase the burden of the driveway and utility easement." The agreement can be amended only with the written consent of both parties. VARIANCE — FINDINGS OF FACT The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that "in considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. City Council Meeting Lindahl Minor Subdivision & Variance September 23, 2002 Comment: The property has been, and currently is, being put to reasonable use. The applicant is simply asking for a further intensification of use. 2.) That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property, not created by the land owner. Comment: The landowner is asking a further subdivision of his land, which he was advised "would probably not be recommended" when he first purchased his property. 3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Comment: There is no hardship demonstrated or apparent; rather the proposed lots simply do not meet the minimum lot requirements for property in a Rural zone. 4.) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Comment: Granting a Variance without the demonstration of hardship or unique circumstances would confer upon the applicant special privilege. 5.) That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Comment: The proposed action would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance, as Variances are to be granted only in cases where hardship /unique physical circumstances are present. P & Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the August 14 & September 11, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted to recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision, with the following conditions: 1.) A park dedication fee of $1,665 to be paid prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 2.) The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage and utility easements measuring ten feet in width along the front and rear property lines, five feet in width along side property lines, and covering all ponding and wetland areas. Such dedication shall be in the form of a Quit Claim Deed, per the City City Council Meeting Lindahl Minor Subdivision & Variance September 23, 2002 attorney, to be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. 3.) The applicant shall dedicate to Anoka County the required public right -of -way adjacent to Ash Street. Such dedication shall be submitted prior to the certification and recording of the Minor Subdivision. CONCLUSION The proposed Minor Subdivision would result in two lots: Tract B would have a width of 155 feet, thus not meeting the minimum lot width requirement of 330' for property in a Rural zone, nor the requirement of full frontage on a road; Tract A would have 330' of width/road frontage, although it would not be contiguous. As a result, staff cannot recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision. As there are no hardship issues apparent on the property, staff cannot recommend approval of a Variance from the lot width requirements. OPTIONS 1.) Approval of the Minor Subdivision and Variance. 2.) Denial of the Minor Subdivision and Variance. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #2 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-117 RESOLUTION DENYING A MINOR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 855 ASH STREET (DONALD LINDAHL PROPERTY) WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Variance and Minor Subdivision of property, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish requirements for Variances and Minor Subdivisions, and WHEREAS, the proposed Variance and Minor Subdivision would result in the creation of property of less than 330 feet of width/road frontage, in violation of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council denies the proposed Minor Subdivision & Variance as described by the attached document entitled "Minor Subdivision for Don Lindahl" by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated July 10, 2002. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of —, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor EXHIBIT # ,KE MEV ler LAKE 4"ASSUA aeqn3, 4y47, m mD,o aka. its oo °t.9 mo b141 po0.4‘4/ meeitort yro- �� � � 0 smm�ua e�0a, ta ps m ® ©wF ©II Mel C��OEIy � A E9EE 0 10 107 14 1989 1991 1992 1993 1994 REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REY. OWN -1110 NOV. 1994 JAN. 1996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 AUG. 1999 SEPT. 2000 MAY 2001 JULY 2002 =AU,-WGIIW -00 - 500' MAP OF OF I r_FMITFP /II OA Er COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1997 Planning and Zoning Board had reviewed this item at its November 12, 1997 meeting and recommended approval on this basis. Council Member Kuether expressed approval of the proposed subdivision, but disagreed with t condition of collecting the $500 Park Dedication fee prior to issuance of the building permit. Ms. Wyland explained that there is no current procedure whereby collection of such a fee coulc take place at a later date, and that collection of this fee is customary at this juncture. Mayor Landers asked if the 10 -acre parcel is developable. Ms. Wyland explained that there is very little wetland at this site, with Hardwood Creek itself being the only undevelopable portion. Council Member Lyden moved to approve the Hardwood Creek Farm minor subdivision pursuant to the condition presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of a Minor Subdivision, Ruth Andrews, 855 Ash Street - Ms. Wyland explained that Ruth Andrews is currently the owner of 58.76 acres of land at 855 Ash Street. This property is immediately adjacent to the Incarnation Cemetery, homestead with three accessory buildings. The 58.76 acres currently yiin includes pproximately 12 acres of upland, which is roughly 20% of the site. The property is zoned Rural, and indicated as such on the City's Land Use Map. Ms. Wyland stated that according to the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 3.B.2.b. "Within zoning districts with a minimum lot size requirement of ten (10) acres or more, up to eighty (80 %) percent of the minimum lot area may be comprised of areas which are platted as street rights -of -way, is below the 100 year flood elevation, or lies within city watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies as defined by this ordinance." The applicant would like to subdivide the property as follows: Tract A would contain 2 acres with 1.52 acres of upland. The plan is to sell this property to Incarnation Cemetery, which is currently just under one acre in size. If the Board should approve this request, the cemetery would be required to request a conditional use permit from the Planning and Zoning Board for expansion of the cemetery. Tract B is proposed to be 11 acres in size with 4.83 acres of upland. This parcel meets the 20% upland requirement, and contains the existing homestead. The applicant has been advised that splitting off one acre with the homestead to provide an additional building site would probably not be recommended in this case. Tract C is 45.76 acres, with 5.66 acres being upland. The majority of the upland is located on a heavily - wooded knoll northwesterly of the existing home, and would require access via a driveway easement just westerly of the existing homestead. 6 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1997 Tracts B and C meet the minimum lot requirements for the Rural Zoning District; however, Tract C does not contain the 20% minimum upland. Tract A does not contain a minimum of 10 acres. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine this minor subdivision to be justified, a variance pursuant to Section 3, Subd. 3.B.2.b. of the City's Zoning Ordinance would be required. On a typical 10 -acre parcel, 2 acres would be required to be upland. Ms. Wyland stated that the Planning and Zoning Board. expressed its belief that the following variance criteria could be met: A. That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to her property not created by the landowner. B. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. D. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. E. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Ms. Wyland concluded the following recommendation with regard to this minor subdivision: 1. Consideration of the subdivision of Tract A be subject to Planning and Zoning Board and City Council approval of an amended conditional use permit to allow expansion of the existing Incarnation Cemetery. Should that expansion be denied, the two acres could be left with Tract B. 2. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine the minor subdivision to be appropriate, Tract B and Tract C be subdivided with a variance to allow the upland area of Tract C to be less than 20% of the total 45.76 acres (two acres would be the typical upland requirement on a 10 -acre parcel). 3. An easement agreement be drafted that would allow access to Tract C from tract B, subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. 4. A $500 park dedication fee be collected for Tract C prior to recording of the subdivision with the County. 5. Permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District requiring easements over all wetland areas. 6. The City Engineer and Fire Chief shall review and approve the driveway plan. Council Member Kuether asked why a $500 Park Dedication fee is not being requested for proposed Parcel A. Ms. Wyland explained that Parcel A includes the cemetery, which is not subject to such a use fee. • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24,1997 Council Member Kuether expressed the concern that Council should not consider this request until the December Planning and Zoning Board and City Council meetings. Council Member Lyden requested clarification of the wetlands impact with respect to the proposed driveway. Ms. Wyland stated that such impact would be minimal. The proposal is for 3,400 square feet of wetland fill, and that Rice Creek Watershed will have to approve this aspect of the proposal. Mr. Ahrens explained that wetland fill of up to 5,000 square feet is permitted. Council Member Lyden also asked about impact of theproposed driveway on development of the buildable property located to its north. Ms. Wyland stated that the property to the north of the proposed driveway is owned by another party, and that access is available from Holly Drive. She added that it may be more appropriate for access to come from Holly Drive in the event that that property is developed. Mayor Landers asked if there should be County approval of the proposed driveway. Ms. Wyland explained that any access would require a County permit. Mayor Landers agreed with Council Member Kuether that Council approval of this project should follow.approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. Ms. Wyland explained that the Planning and Zoning Board had substantially approved the project with the sole exception of the portion intended for expansion of the cemetery. Mayor Landers asked if delay in action by Council would pose a hardship to the project. Ms. Kathy Rickert, broker for Home Realty, spoke on behalf of both buyers and sellers. Ms. Rickert provided pictures of the proposed development of this property, stating that they best fit this unique property. She stated that the planned development would include two houses, and pointed out specifically the proposed driveway. Council Member Lyden repeated Mayor Landers' question regarding hardship to the project in the event Council should determine that it should not act on this request until the Planning and Zoning Board has given final approval. Ms. Rickert indicated that delay by Council would pose a hardship, as pending approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District (scheduled to take place on November 25, 1997) the project can go forward immediately. Council Member Bergeson requested clarification from Ms. Wyland as to precisely what portion of the proposed project had not been recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. Ms. Wyland confirmed that the two acres which were proposed for addition to the cemetery is the only portion of the proposal that had not been finalized. She added that, in the event the Planning and Zoning Board did not approve expansion of the cemetery, the two acres in question would simply revert to the parcel designated as "Parcel A ". Council Member Bergeson indicated that requirements such as those that might be required to expand the cemetery, as proposed, normally relate to property use including buildings and other types of development, and that he could see no reason why the remainder of the project should not go COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1997 forward pending that determination as there should be no problem with approval of the cemetery expansion. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the minor subdivision requested by Ruth Andrews for 855 Ash Street, pursuant to the conditions presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of an Amended Conditional Use Permit, Pat -a -Cake Childcare, 7761 Lake Drive - Ms. Wyland explained that Ms. Patty Beecher is the owner and operator of the Pat -a- Cake Daycare currently located at 7761 Lake Drive, just north of the Centennial Fire Department. Ms. Beecher has operated this center for approximately three years. Prior to that time, she operated out of her home. Since at least 1989, a daycare center has been located in this building. At this time Ms. Beecher wishes to expand her facility to accommodate a total of 75 children. Currently Ms. Beecher is licensed by the State of Minnesota for 48 children. The site of this daycare center is within the City's Neighborhood Business District and, according to the requirements of the existing Ordinance, a day care is permitted with a conditional use permit. Ms. Beecher will be purchasing the entire building in December and expanding the existing center to a total of 4,200 square feet. The Building Inspector and Fire Chief are aware of the proposed expansion and will be inspecting the site for compliance. The applicant has also been in touch with the Minnesota Department of Human Services to apply for an amended license to allow for the increase to 75 children. Ms. Wyland added that utilities are proposed for extension north on Lake Drive in the Spring of 1998. Ms. Beecher has indicated a willingness to connect to those utilities at that time. The facility is presently serviced by a mound septic system, which will then be removed and the play area moved to the rear of the site. There are 41 parking spaces provided on this site. This reconfiguration will allow for an expansion of the current parking area to allow for the 37 spaces required for the various uses in the building. Ms. Wyland concluded that Staff recommended approval of this amended conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. An amended license for the expanded use is received from the Minnesota Department of Human Services. 2. Permits are obtained, as required, from the Building Department for any remodeling and change in signage. 3. The Fire Chief shall inspect the sight for compliance. 9 Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. hardwood Creek Farm, 80th Street, Minor Subdivision EXHIBIT # 3 Ms. Wyland explained that this request by Nancy Erickson, owner of Hardwood Creek Farm, is to split their 40 -acre parcel into two pieces. Parcel A will be 10 acres in size, and Parcel B will be 30 acres in size. Both have required access on 80th Street; Parcel A having 332 feet, and Parcel B, 1300 feet. Parcel B presently contains the existing Hardwood Creek Farm stable and riding arena.. Both parcels will meet the requirements of the City's subdivision ordinance, and a $500 park dedication fee is requested for Parcel A, which will be retained by Ms. Erickson. The arena and stable area contained in Parcel B are to be sold, hence the need for the subdivision. Ms. Wyland recommended approval of the proposed subdivision contingent upon receipt of the $500 park dedication fee for Parcel A. This fee would be required, as Parcel A would be available as a home site. The question was raised as to why a third parcel -- Parcel C - -was included in the original Sketch and Description provided to the Board. Ms. Wyland explained that Ms. Erickson thought the party planning to purchase Parcel B would want to build a home, which would have to be on a separate parcel. Subsequent to preparation of the Sketch and Description, it was determined that no such plans exist. Mr. Johnson asked if a home could ultimately be constructed on Parcel B without additional action by the Board. Ms. Wyland responded that it could. Buildable space on Parcel A was questioned. Ms. Wyland explained that no topographical survey was ordered, as the property is upland; and, although it is not 100% buildable, it is definitely more than 20 %. Mr. Robinson explained that all of the land is upland with the exception of a portion that slopes down to a creek and back up again. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the Hardwood Creek. Farm, 2306 80th Street, minor subdivision, and was supported by Mr. Robinson. Motion carried, 7 -0. B. Ruth Andrews, 855 Ash Street, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland explained that Ms. Ruth Andrews is currently the owner of 58.76 acres of land at 855 Ash Street. This property is immediately adjacent to the Incarnation Cemetery, and contains an existing homestead with three accessory buildings. The 58.76 acres currently includes approximately 12 acres of upland, which is roughly 20% of the site. The property is zoned Rural, and indicated as such on the City's Land Use Map. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 3 Ms. Wyland stated that according to the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 3.B.2.b. "Within zoning districts with a minimum lot size requirement of ten (10) acres or more, up to eighty (80 %) percent of the minimum lot area may be comprised of areas which are platted as street rights -of -way, is below the 100 year flood elevation, or lies within city watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies as defined by this ordinance." The applicant would like to subdivide the property as follows: Tract A would contain 2 acres with 1.52 acres of upland. The plan is to sell this property to Incarnation Cemetery, which is currently just under one acre in size. If the Board should approve this request, the cemetery would be required to request a conditional use permit from the Planning and Zoning Board for expansion of the cemetery. Tract B is proposed to be 11 acres in size with 4.83 acres of upland. This parcel meets the 20% upland requirement, and contains the existing homestead. The applicant has been advised that splitting off one acre with the homestead to provide an additional building site would probably not be recommended in this case. Tract C is 45.76 acres, with 5.66 acres being upland. The majority of the upland is located on a heavily - wooded knoll northwesterly of the existing home, and would require access via a driveway easement just westerly of the existing homestead. Tracts B and C meet the minimum lot requirements for the Rural Zoning District; however, Tract C does not contain the 20% minimum upland. Tract A does not contain a minimum of 10 acres. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine this minor subdivision to be justified, a variance pursuant to Section 3, Subd. 3.B.2.b. of the City's Zoning Ordinance would be required. On a typical 10 -acre parcel, 2 acres would be required to be upland. Ms. Wyland concluded the following recommendation with regard to this minor subdivision: 1. Consideration of the subdivision of Tract A be subject to Planning and Zoning Board and City Council approval of an amended conditional use permit to allow expansion of the existing Incarnation Cemetery. Should that expansion be denied, the two acres could be left with Tract A. 2. Should the Planning and Zoning Board determine the minor subdivision to be appropriate, Tract B and Tract C be subdivided with a variance to allow the upland area of Tract C to be less than 20% of the total 45.76 acres (two acres would be the typical upland requirement on a 10 -acre parcel). 3. An easement agreement be drafted that would allow access to Tract C from tract B, subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. 4. A $500 park dedication fee be collected for Tract C prior to recording of the • • Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 4 subdivision with the County. Mr. Dunn asked about accuracy of the elevations represented by the map provided to the Board for review of this request. Ms. Wyland explained that she had personally visited the site. She added that the knoll is quite obvious, with the balance of the 40 acres clearly wetlands. The logical location for the driveway easement is that proposed. She stated that the elevations are in the 900+ foot range. Mr. Robinson suggested that short of having delineation by Rice Creek Watershed there would be a problem with the driveway. Ms. Wyland stated that a permit would have to be obtained. It was suggested that the Board's approval would have to be based upon Rice Creek Watershed's approval. Mr. Dunn asked whether or not there are any additional cemeteries provided for within the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Wyland stated that there are not. Ms. Kathy Rickert, broker for Home Realty, spoke on behalf of both buyers and sellers. Ms. Rickert provided pictures of the proposed development of this property, stating that they best fit this unique property. She stated that the planned development would include two houses, preservation of the natural run -off of the land, the trees, and the natural habitat, and in all other aspects conforms with regulations of the area. The proposed use would not impede any normal or orderly development of the surrounding neighborhood. Chair Schaps raised the issue of the 11 -acre parcel, taking into account the possibility of splitting off 1 acre for a home site. Ms. Rickert indicated that thought had been given to that split, but that the decision was made to maintain one parcel. Chair Schaps clarified that all parties understand the City's position with respect to a split. Mr. Don Lyndale agreed that he understood the City's position; however, he stated his understanding that an ordinance was in existence which would provide for such a split. Ms. Wyland explained that there is an ordinance which provides for such a split, but that the property would have to be examined more carefully with the lot configured so as to allow for an additional building site. She could not assure that this could be accomplished. Mr. Lyndale indicated his understanding, adding that he is trying to work with the existing configuration. However, he does not wish to be restricted with respect to future use by the Planning and Zoning Board's present action. Ms. Wyland emphasized that reconfiguration may not be possible. Mr. Thompson stated that it is not presently his intent to attempt such a reconfiguration, but that he may with to explore that possibility some time in the future. Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the length of the driveway easement for Tract C, which would cross wetlands. He added that the knoll connects with the upland property • Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 5 to the north, and that development of the knoll should take place in conjunction with development to the north and not have separate access from the south. Chair Schaps requested clarification of the total number of homes on the site. Ms. Rickert acknowledged that there is an existing home and that another home is proposed for construction on the property. Jerry Hawkins of Incarnation Cemetery stated that his organization proposes to take on an additional two acres, which would triple the size of the current cemetery site. Mr. Hawkins indicated that the cemetery has existed since 1922. Mr. Johnson pointed out that a portion of Tract A is wetland, and not usable by the cemetery. Mr. Hawkins stated that he was aware of that. Steve Thompson, purchaser of proposed Tract C, asked about the Planning and Zoning Board's problem with two structures. He indicated that his plans include an office within the smaller structure, and would build a larger home some time in the future. Ms. Wyland explained that the City allows one single - family home per lot. She added that should the owner choose to build a larger home in the future, the small one would have to be removed. Ms. Wyland further explained that businesses are not permitted within a residential district. Mr. Thompson stated that his view is that of having an office within his home, not as a separate business. Ms. Wyland indicated that further consultation would be required as to the inclusion of a business on the property. Mr. Thompson also questioned payment of the $500 park dedication fee. Ms. Wyland explained that any time a piece of land is proposed for construction of a home, such a fee is required. Mr. Brixius added that home occupations are permitted in this district within a permitted accessory building. He suggested that Mr. Thompson would have to provide additional information regarding his business and, if it meets the definition, can be housed within a separate building. With regard to the park dedication fee, Mr. Brixius explained that the fee is charged as part of the overall subdivision and who actually pays the fee may be negotiable among the parties purchasing/developing the property. Mr. Dunn requested clarification of what the Planning and Zoning Board is acting on at this time. Ms. Wyland explained that the only action proposed at this time is the minor subdivision. Development and use of the property would be a separate issue. Mr. Herr asked about splitting Tracts B and C so that an easement would not be included in Tract B. Ms. Wyland indicated that possibility had not been explored. She added that it would be very difficult to maintain the minimum amount of required upland with the easement placed elsewhere. • Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 6 The required width of the easement was questioned. Mr. Ahrens responded that the minimum is a 20 -foot paved surface for emergency vehicle use. Chair Schaps suggested that Mr. Thompson would have to meet certain requirements regarding installation of the proposed driveway in order to satisfy the fire code. Mr. Ahrens clarified that the easement is for 20 feet, while the proposed driveway is 10 feet in width. He added that the City's fire chief would have to approve the proposed driveway. Mr. Thompson agreed that emergency vehicles would have to be able to negotiate the driveway. Mr. Brixius stated that the City's zoning ordinance also contains requirements as to driveway width and surface, which must be satisfied. Mr. Herr asked if the City has in the past allowed something less than 20 %. Ms. Wyland explained that the 20% upland requirement is new to the City's ordinance. Previously the requirement was for 80% for a 10 -acre minimum. Mr. Dunn asked if other options had been explored, in light of the large amount of wetlands. He asked if a wetlands parcel could be created, ensuring that the area would remain wetlands and unbuildable for infinity. Mr. Brixius stated that the disadvantage of splitting the wetlands off as a separate parcel is that it would most likely go tax forfeit. Remaining part of the larger parcel it would stay within single ownership, it would be protected from future development by the easement, and it would remain a property of value. Mr. Thompson pointed out that a portion of the land northwest and south of the subject site, although inaccessible, is dry, potentially buildable parcels of land. Chair Schaps asked about variance criteria. Ms. Wyland cited five findings of fact, as follow: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance would not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other land, structures or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1997 Page 7 Chair Schaps asked Mr. Brixius to respond to the variance criteria as stated by Ms. Wyland. Mr. Brixius indicated that there is justification for a variance in the following areas: First, the area is genuinely unique due to the wetlands. He suggested that the ordinance could be skirted by creating an outlot which would encompass most of the wetland, reducing the overall size and bringing the figure to within 20 %, which would serve no constructive purpose. Mr. Brixius added that it is in the best interest of the City for the land to remain in single ownership and, in that respect, fulfills the intent of the ordinance. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision requested by Ruth Andrews, conditioned upon approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District and of the Fire Chief with respect to property access, supported by Mr. Robinson. Motion carried 7 -0. C. Pat -a -Cake Daycare, 7761 Lake Drive, Amended Conditional Use Permit, PUBLIC HEARING Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Ms. Wyland explained that Ms. Patty Beecher is the owner and operator of the Pat -a -Cake Daycare currently located at 7761 Lake Drive, just north of the Fire Department. Ms. Beecher has operated this center for approximately three years. Prior to that time, she operated out of her home. Since at least 1989, a daycare center has been located in this building. At this time Ms. Beecher wishes to expand her facility to accommodate a total of 75 children. Currently Ms. Beecher is licensed by the State of Minnesota for 48 children. The site of this daycare center is within the City's Neighborhood Business District and, according to the requirements of the existing Ordinance, a day care is permitted with a conditional use permit. Ms. Beecher will be purchasing the entire building in December and expanding the existing center to a total of 4,200 square feet. The Building Inspector and Fire Chief are aware of the proposed expansion and will be inspecting the site for compliance. The applicant has also been in touch with the Minnesota Department of Human Services to apply for an amended license to allow for the increase to 75 children. Ms. Wyland added that utilities are proposed for extension north on Lake Drive in the Spring of 1998. Ms. Beecher has indicated a willingness to connect to those utilities at that time. The facility is presently services by a mound septic system, which will then be removed and the play area moved to the rear of the site. This reconfiguration will allow for an expansion of the current parking area. 5 6.862• AL..82, 62.00N s. ' '. *t 4 rCO ;zts 0 O 2' b 40 ' i In roL 3.05.90.4oN•.;__,, :>•99'1i Ct m r I 1'. CO G` •. of 1 Q \ I ti _ L.. 4 en,....:: I d�J+ co \ / Sd'ZE6 S..BZ',, 62.005 , 9'L0l rr —J G LYLl4 ff •11.<t <4 ... .,4• 4;4.2-13• 8 .94 •. 4 .1'1 �Ot�. re9t — ff r m 4. . VO'L9Z.• 3.9Z,V�00S,j\ r rcYSt 10 W !r'60/ .. N '' �, ` . . yy0 156 1 56.28 V t`, ` - 1. !g .Q •.. = t �cr ) . 'T. F. • ' {1 � `,4f yt: ,y n m 11 I M ❑ A O .c + co a i •a • \Ad7•sTt7 .. 39\ �'�� ��_ --- -V- YL7 -LUG O 1 r< C /' rrr tB Li _ $�cVZ.00S \ \/'Y`,• are, . ;,. 505.3SSS�E_ ..r' -LY' , i^:2'9'J______. fIOO7OUV Eh5EA1'tlT�l [0's9l '0 Ir n ___� ____ -_ .. _ r 1 j3. '.940QN y r s• n;. 1( �' 1 I c '' ii, ^ $ 1 ' z W I nI ,'N r m _v _. v a 1 85 SLY SS" 099 ,f dl...46, 0/.00N. I �f FA” ff CO CO tt ff Z DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIN TO BE SET (L.S. No. 25341) DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND #9808 O • Lic. No. 25341 W. Obermiller c 6!2"96 3NI7 A1213dOMd 30 ISY3 L..7«8, 62;DO,s 321144 ET 30N3d 321W 84 2 3.0S,90.LON rL'008 ccx lL'BOZ a N z \s, ti !;;C) N I L13NI7 .i0 15Y3 1 33 F 3ON3d 3d8% N3AOM w r�c 808' ► z,fr OOS v> °' g ^ca J_ J NI 43 ti? -\.`£8108 , LL•5Ll Ji S .968 &a1, . \_ y �___-- .v � Y d � / = s :1 \r o 'o m m m ISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 894.03 W0 � )- 0 j M Z °a0 w w O 1-- 2 O- U w V1 VI Q OLi- w0 0) Li Li-, C/1 w = Z_ 0���1 }�} D 0 w?= w0oo F Q p Q Q Z W N Q Oc\i N 0 cn F 1- W 0 Z I- (1) 0 CC EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: C W - ^ 1 oLn JLa. 0 I+ QONLi fY o CC C to C3 U V L� o A141 5" SVLY ; oi Q Xt X 9!'099 3..LZ.01,00S O 0 10 DENOTES PROPOSED CON DENOTES PROPOSED CONTO DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS O DENOTES 1/2° IRON PIN SET (L.S DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AS NO O • AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz/Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution No. 02 -82 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Russian Baptist Church, west of Baldwin Lake Road and north of Ash Street (Co. Rd. J) ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City has received an application for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for Russian Baptist Church. The proposed site is in the far southwestern comer of the City, west of Baldwin Lake Road and north of Ash Street. The property, which is 4.6 acres in size, is zoned Rural. Since churches are listed as a Conditional Use in a Rural Zone, a Conditional Use Permit has also been applied for. The Russian Baptist Church currently has approximately 180 members. The church is now renting space in Spring Lake Park for their meetings and parish needs, and has applied for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit in order to construct a church of their own. This review is based on the following attached exhibits: 1.) General Location Map 2.) Certificate of Survey 3.) Site Plan 4.) Floor Plan 5.) Elevation Plan 6.) Landscape Plan 7.) Lighting Plan 8.) Utility Plan 9.) Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan , City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP ANALYSIS Land Use Compatibilitv The following chart identifies the existing land use and zoning surrounding the proposed site: Direction Land Use Zoning Site Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural North Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural East Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural South Residential (Shoreview) Residential (Shoreview) West Residential (Circle Pines) Residential (Circle Pines) The City's proposed 2001 Land Use Plan guides the subject site as Low Density, Sewered Residential (one to 2.5 units per acre). While the 2001 Plan is not yet officially adopted, it does reflect the long -range goals of the community related to existing and future land use. Site Description The site is a 4.6 -acre lot fronting Ash Street (County Road J). The northern half of the property is wooded, with a wetland in the northwest quarter. The Southern half of the property is largely open grassland. The west border of the property abuts the rear lot lines of residential homes along Indian Hills Drive in Circle Pines. The northern border abuts the back half of a property located on Baldwin Lake Road in Lino Lakes. The east border of the property abuts the rear lot lines of three homes also along Baldwin Lake Road, as well as a neighboring home on Ash Street. To the south, across Ash Street in Shoreview, are residential homes. Zoning /Conditional Use Permit The Site is zoned Rural. Churches are listed as a Conditional Use in such a district with the following provisions: 1. Side yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet. 2. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with the landscape and screening regulations of Section 3 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Adequate off -street parking and access is provided on the site... and such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 3, subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. 2 City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP 4. Adequate off -street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by Section 3, subd. 6 of this ordinance. Additionally, under Section 2, subd. 2.B.7 of the City Zoning Ordinance, any issued Conditional Use Permits must meet the following standards: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 4. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 5. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 6. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 7. Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. 8. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 9. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. The proposed site and use appear to comply with the above - described provisions and standards. Building Issues Proposed construction includes 15,920 total square feet of building over three levels: • Main Level: 7,438 square feet (sanctuary and related uses) • Lower Level: 7,438 square feet (classrooms, fellowship area and kitchen facilities) • Upper Level: 1,044 square feet (storage and child/parent room) Plans also show a 60' X 50' footprint to the north of the proposed church, to be used as a future expansion area. Any future expansion will require a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review. The exterior of the building will include brick facing /apron and vinyl siding, with a proposed 45 -foot steeple. No bells are proposed. Asphalt shingles will cover the roof. City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP There is neither water nor sewer available for the site. Plans indicate a proposed drain field north of the church, with adequate room for a secondary drain field site. Soils tests confirm that the site can adequately support a septic system. As building code requires a sprinkler system for this building, and the site has no public water available, a holding tank for fire suppression purposes will be required. Initial design specifications for the tank/sprinkler system have been submitted, and the system appears to be adequate for the needs of the site. Public Services The site is located in a Phase 1 Growth Area. Lino Lakes water and sewer connections are approximately 2500 feet away. Although there are no immediate plans for City services to be installed, it is possible that such services might be available by 2010. The provision of public utilities for properties, when at all possible, is a goal of the City. As a result, although Lino Lakes utilities are not feasible for the site, staff are investigating the possibility of servicing the site with utilities from the City of Circle Pines. City Engineer Jim Studenski reports the Circle Pines connections are located 350' west and 125' north of the site, along Indian Hills Drive. Connecting the site to such utilities is estimated to cost approximately $55,000 and would require a joint powers agreement between the City of Circle Pines and the City of Lino Lakes. Staff are still exploring the possibility of connecting the site with use of Circle Pines utilities. Although all avenues have not yet been explored, provision of utilities via Circle Pines appears to be problematic due to right -of -way issues related to the placement of utilities, MUSA expansion, and location of existing private utility services. As a result, staff has concluded that the applicant should probably plan on pursuing their initial plans of using a well and septic system for the site, which would also necessitate provision of a tank system for fire suppression purposes. Parking /Access/Traffic City Ordinance requires one parking space for each four seats in a church. There are 375 seats show in the main assembly hall, which would then require 94 parking stalls. Plans for the church show 99 parking stalls to be constructed. Although there are additional classrooms and fellowship areas in the lower level of the church, these areas are not expected to be used by adults concurrently with the main assembly hall. As a result, the parking stall estimates generated from the number of seats in the main assembly hall appear to be adequate for church needs. Plans indicate an area to the northeast of the proposed church to be used for additional parking should the church choose to expand. This area would contain 27 additional stalls. The Environmental Board has recommended use of green parking in future 4 City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP parking expansion areas, as well as an increase in the use of infiltration and storm water practices around parking areas in general. Access is off Ash Street, a County road. The Anoka County Highway Department has offered several comments on the site, to include the following: • Dedication of 100 feet of right -of -way on Ash Street to Anoka County, along with right -of- access • Realignment of the access driveway so that is aligns with the eastern edge of the parking lot • Entrance width should be 24 feet wide and include a 6 "curb, per State Aid Highway requirements • The proposed landscape plantings should be removed from sight triangles • The proposed infiltration pond adjacent to Ash Street should be removed from the County right -of -way • A permit must be pulled with Anoka County for any work to be done in the right -of -way Additionally, County officials have verbally reported to City Engineer Jim Studenski that a right turn lane should be striped onto the existing shoulder of Ash Street to facilitate right -turns onto the property. Plans show a two -lane, 24 -foot wide driveway entrance to the site off Ash Street. The preexisting gravel driveway leading to the neighboring property to the east, as shown on survey and engineering plans, will no longer share access across the site. There has been no traffic generation study conducted. Setbacks The following chart indicates the required and proposed setbacks for the site: Setback Required Proposed Principle Building — front/from street 40 feet (for arterial roads) 40 feet Principle Building — side yard 50 feet (for CUP requirements) 50 feet Principle Building — rear yard 30 feet + 30 feet Parking — front/from street 15 feet 30 feet Parking — side yard 15 feet 15 feet Parking — rear yard 10 feet + 10 feet 5 City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP Lighting A photometric plan has been submitted, along with fixture details. Lighting will be no- spill, with meter readings within City requirements (< 1 foot candle for streets; < 0.4 foot candle for abutting residential property). Neighbors to the west of the site had expressed some concerns at the June Planning & Zoning Board meeting regarding the possibility of glare from the lights, and had inquired about alternative management measures for the lighting, such as dimming or shutting off lights at night when the church was not being used. In general, shoebox style /no -spill fixtures should solve for any glare problems, as lighting is completely shielded and directed only downward. Additionally, building officials report there is nothing in the building code which specifies a minimum height for fixtures. In responding to inquires about shutting off lights, police officials recommend that lights should be on "from dusk to dawn," according to CPTED guidelines. Such guidelines are advisory and not compulsory, however; police officials recommend that, at a minimum, several poles stay lit and that the front of the building and all entrances /exits be lit. Landscaping The proposed church would exist as a conditional use within a Rural zone. City Ordinance directs that such conditional uses provide "adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping...in compliance with Sec. 3.subd.4.S." City Ordinance specifically directs buffering /screening in the form of "either a fence or green belt planting strip." Neighboring residents had expressed concern with the idea of using a fence as a buffer. Rather, residents requested a landscaped buffer be used, with possible use of berming. Such suggestions appear to be attractive to both church and City, and as a result the landscape plan has been revised to reflect such changes. Trash Enclosure /Screening Plans show a 13' X 10' trash enclosure located at the northern end of the parking area. The enclosure is 6' -8" high and constructed of concrete block painted to match the principle building color. Signage No signage plans have yet been submitted. The Lino Lakes Sign Ordinance limits institutional signage in the Rural zone in the following ways: maximum of 32- square feet of signage area; a maximum of 8 feet high; no closer than 10 feet to any property line. 6 City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP Parks & Trail There will be no park dedication fee required. There are no trails currently planned for the north side of Ash Street. Grading/Drainage /Wetland Engineering issues have been resolved. The Rice Creek Watershed District has issued a TWAFAA for this project. Environmental Board Recommendations The Environmental Board reviewed this application at their May 29, 2002, meeting and recommended approval with some changes. The memo from Marty Asleson dated June 6, 2002, details these changes and is attached to this report. In general, recommended changes center around the following: 1.) Submission of a tree inventory and tree preservation plan. 2.) Increase infiltration and storm water practices, particularly around parking areas. 3.) Alter tree choices, and move some trees out of water infiltration areas. 4.) Use of green parking in future parking expansion areas. Numbers 1 & 3 have been addressed by the applicant. Planning & Zoning Board Recommendations This application was initially presented at the June 12th meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board, but was tabled pending further information on a number of issues, including: • Investigating providing city services through either the City of Circle Pines or the City of Shoreview, as an alternative to the proposed use of a well and septic system. • Drainage: neighboring residents had concerns about runoff onto their property. • Buffer greenbelt: neighboring residents were not supportive of the use of a fence; a revised landscape plan using vegetation and/or berms was proposed. • Lighting: neighboring residents had concerns over glare. At the request of neighboring residents, the Russian Baptist Church held a second neighborhood meeting on June 26th in order to meet with residents and address their concerns. The application was then again heard by the Planning & Zoning Board on July 10th, at which time the board recommended approval of the application, with the conditions outlined by staff, as well as the added condition that "Anoka County Highway Department review and approval be required prior to City Council review." 7 City Council September 23, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the application, with the following conditions: 1.) Any future expansion of the church shall require Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Amendment. 2.) Incorporate suggestions made by Jane Pemble of the Anoka County Highway Department, in her letter dated August 30, 2002: • Dedication of 50 feet of right -of -way on Ash Street to Anoka County, along with right -of- access • Realignment of the access driveway so that is aligns with the eastern edge of the parking lot Entrance width should be 24 feet wide and include a 6 "curb, per State Aid Highway requirements The proposed landscape plantings should be removed from sight triangles • The proposed infiltration pond adjacent to Ash Street should be removed from the County right -of -way • A permit must be pulled with Anoka County for any work to be done in the right -of -way • A right -turn lane should be striped onto the existing shoulder of Ash Street, to facilitate right -hand turns. 3.) Driveway access shall be exclusive to the site, and shall not be shared with the property to the east. 4.) A performance agreement shall be prepared, including financial securities. OPTIONS 1.) Approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, with Conditions: Resolution No. 02 -82. 2.) Denial of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit. 3.) Return to Staff with Direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1 8 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RUSSIAN BAPTIST CHURCH, LOCATED NORTH OF ASH STREET & WEST OF BALDWIN LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Site Plan Review & Conditional Use Permit for the construction of Russian Baptist Church, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish standards for Site Plan Review, in Section 2, subd. 5, and Conditional Use Permits, in Section 2, subd.2, and WHEREAS, the proposed Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit meets the above described standards, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Lino Lakes City Council approves the proposed Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for Russian Baptist Church as described by the plans and documents stamped as received June 13, 2002 and August 1, 2002 (Site Plan & Landscape Plan only). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1.) Any future expansion of the church shall require Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Amendment. 2.) Incorporate suggestions made by Jane Pemble of the Anoka County Highway Department, in her letter dated August 30, 2002: • Dedication of 50 feet of right -of -way on Ash Street to Anoka County, along with right -of- access • Realignment of the access driveway so that is aligns with the eastern edge of the parking lot • Entrance width should be 24 feet wide and include a 6 "curb, per State Aid Highway requirements • The proposed landscape plantings should be removed from sight triangles • The proposed infiltration pond adjacent to Ash Street should be removed from the County right -of -way • A permit must be pulled with Anoka County for any work to be done in the right -of- way • A right -turn lane should be striped onto the existing shoulder of Ash Street, to facilitate right -hand turns. 3.) Driveway access shall be exclusive to the site, and shall not be shared with the property to the east. 4.) A performance agreement shall be prepared, including financial securities. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this — day of —, 2002. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk EXIIIBIT # / Invirtificri 9;0: ii©5v+ PaR mp 4 vaOP�,Qd a �Q 188iLU8:� 1.13 IntlEgararliih. Sao n©i ono 000mian nu rig El %TM • NO E6 A• N0. 4d. ._......._ ..................... NOKA OUNTY S -VEY• R S OF ctr COWRY —STATE —AIQ DRAWN SEP. 1974 REVISED JAN. 1987 REVISED NOV. 1994 REVISED NOV. 1978 REV. MAY 1988 REV.. JAN. 1996 REV. MAR.1980 REV. AUG. 1989 REV. JULY 1997 REV. SEP. 1981 REV. FEB. 1991 REV. JULY 1998 REV. DEC .1982 REV. FEB. 1992 REV. AUG. 1999 REV. JULY 1985 REV. F E B. 1993 REV. SEPT. 2000 REV. DEC. 1985 REV. MAY 1994 REV. SCALE 1'1=1500' L1 ic.:ate or purvey Tor: mussian rsaptist ..... - CAINE & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 1Zwoun_....� �ee. • `.rr.ar.r tole` • awn. MI .r .11. r..rr. T • l s ICr - IL 2 O 4 Op WO 2 24 00 Wu. e7osauLJIN 'sari oun HJ211HJ 1.SildV8 NVISSf121 JoJ Suippne pasodoad J I zt ;??9;i9��a �� I. �� 111::: l !_ - is iRM O:i::i: 1c N ?1 <` 5 # 1� 1 is cw a` i '1+ { 1 I 5 TIP' 18 ;4'1 'Iiiiiiii'llil yS "e pp b V' 7 ggo 1WIY! 4411 1 w 1 I!IIIhIL d l a' ' 1ij! ; !J!iJIiIih g lyis �agiij id 9 �, 1��1i ! al�J °9�2�aaE2a�j 1 L a { ! 1 i1 111i 114 b i oatfaj` 1 F `1 f P1{a'g' #9��i #33316 L I g ihlaillna31Ia J!d'!iii{ ayaall i 'IY � - ..ue.,:r : ..wwswr,+r• 1 a_ N . w a .: a + ? 1.,.I ,,I .,e `u= .I t mi d c W ,. ,y1.4 i- -i r !I„ J •1 Y p_.__. t — �1 r_ I r -- r-- IIII cc "I_ 0uu''sn ' a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LL1.1 J_I d WOG . J z z z W V4- I' U' Q� eiosauury4 'sari oun HD2If1HD .1SIldVEI NVISSf121 ao j Su pp8 pasodoad 8 6 1 Y A-.0 0 -AC , _a i CD„ 11 4 1■ tIr&� . Y i y �� 11g 1 49 FJ ®g1�3 2a -- --pemiIr2t ��I _ ' �'I r a ea a — ffi Hil =' .. -I M , g D . _ o m1A11111 111 tiJ1__.__ '' • •= . . =g _ rrrr�rurwrrr: 2 fil... ..., .. 114 u � ® pg N : 11 2 o� e Iii.g R_ Cr 1 t. !i,_ g C 3 ---iii!— r!.e ID �I - J wnom ssra 1 • x ' tt 4 ••■•••.•.... II11111111111 L111111111111 MII•1111•111111111M 211••••••111111111E b 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIII .........m cD b b A. , _a i CD„ 11 , �. 1■ E u 6 , . Y i y �� 11g 1 49 FJ ®g1�3 2a . 0 -A[ I-_AIR _ _ ' �'I II1111;� a ea a — ffi Hil =' .. -I M , g tt 4 ••■•••.•.... II11111111111 L111111111111 MII•1111•111111111M 211••••••111111111E b 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIII .........m cD b b A. ;� , �. A a E u 6 I L�a!1 S.35 SC _ _ . .- .....0 I 1I � ;�®.. -F _ ®= I Q._..� ! 0.1 ........ —Ii e a ea a — r... [I!! L m e 3 °.i..f �~ , g 0 31-.9 McHl.M 71.1117.! 4 IL_ c I. as SCI 41. G3� b ICEV 888 M Y 11 Ac �r 1T„ _IL- - .JIsi yIIb sg I��allkga 0 Q a 0 iD -/LI I VIII 1 111 i I'I) IIIIIIIMM III A olosauuM 'seri oui1 HJ2If1HD ISIldVEI NVISSf121 ao j 2ulpl ng pasodoad 3 !g • 0 tia 13 LT 4 JJ iii e.'Ill 1U1111 1 dam ii 11 it it 4 �1 11 :1 11 11 1, 1 11 11 25 b 1 I 0 ni 1L I1IIIII II _d 1 ,1 ,I �1 II 1, 11 11 11 0 ¢W uosauum 'serf oul1 HD21f1HD ISIIdd9 NVISSf121 .10j SupPp a pasodoad a I16f 42 •L 1� b L `i I.�1 ) \ I r I _ —� VC r1 I 1\ W ,,6 i "8' 1,1 I SGIC L ! 1 i io e_(P LlkIll I kx 001- 0150 �p I f ). rr ' N j L_ — r -L' ) r—r - -� J' I I L_L_= —_ ;Aro 0077 O U Z a 31 LLANPNG SCHEDULE v Y Q W w z s O i i 9 B 1 1 1 l i i Fa N F r r C C C z v gg if 1 t ! Is ! a g h 9, 15 = ll al qi Y. e u e v a e z o. .. . a n _ bAO IWO VI Esh 2W® elosauuryy 'sa)fei oun HJ21f1HJ ISIldVB NVISSf1 I .roJ Sulpilna pasodoid 1 1 LIGHTING PLAN •i • L_ �pm a 5 t g A zr- �TI2I :von mra .- 'd.1 rm.", P.m.,"a,` wo owal Mu* 40£56. NN '3Nd1 IWH 3f1N3'V ONZ9t ££9Z H32IfH3 1SLLdY9 NVISSf1N Nrm unun A mis YLOS]NNV1 'S3W1 OMl HO21f1H3 1SI1dV9 NVISSf121 6s 1 �1J 0 w W I R v v • m,Iz 9N 'OM /pi, 3lro 33 1 I ' e .eue peep uo. .a<+7a w+WU° wd WW1' a�31i1 00I P9133NJ Nxrao .� antsetr.. T 031131520 uN •m w . .., snnisN321 ^a ware *D£89 NW '3)IV1 WVH 3fN3JV ONZ9t ££9Z HOafHO 1SLLdY8 NVISSna 9! +.-w.m- .momm.. -..w.. NVId IOHLNOO NOISON3 _ a ONV 39VNIV210 'ONIOVaO . ny V1053NNIN '03NV1 ONII HOafHO 'SUAVE] NriSsna RNIARR713255528 °_J zg Asa 411; \ - - 9 1 } i 15,1 ' p e e 3iS m 8 S 'Ao^ if, I.' ' s■� )■ kt Y :d i b I !1p \ } e�p r \ L O 0 N H rn o 031. F r la ri i r r fr .f rrr /J .1 • W N O z a 1 Jtir�a r T-' ; ■a Ws 4e. ea wG rh $ n 10 r3 a p4 Rene $ 6 7 a F 1 ..� 41-5 5 b� ' 999' „ a" 6 � fi; a b ma ;Ii .��' ' ,61 u zh JH!I " 21 a a STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7F Michael Grochala September 23, 2002 Site and Building Plan Review /Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Spirit Hills Commercial Site ACTION REQUESTED: 4/5 Vote to Rezone — Ordinance 08 -02 3/5 Site and Building Review - Resolution 02 -88 BACKGROUND Rockne Goertz has submitted an application for Site and Building Plan Review, CUP and Rezoning to allow the development of a neighborhood business center at the northwest corner of Ware Rd. and Birch St. The City Council tabled the request at it's August 12, 2002 meeting. The proposal was discussed at the September 4, 2002 City Council work session. Prior to development of the site a final plat will be required and an existing drainage and utility easement platted with the Spirit Hills development will need to be vacated. The final plat and the easement vacation are both subject to City Council review and approval. The application was previously submitted by Glenn Rehbein Companies as Village Hills. This review is based on the following plan submittals: Site grading, drainage, and erosion control plat dated 2/1302 and revised 6/12/02 Site Plan dated 3/4/02 and revised 6/12/02 Utility Plan dated 3/5/02 and revised 6/12/02 Landscaping and tree preservation plan dated 3/11/02 and revised 6/12/02 Building Elevations dated 7/10/02 Lighting Plan dated received 3/11/02 Environmental Board Comments dated 4/24/02 Traffic Analysis, dated 9/4/02, prepared by URS. Spirit Hills. Page 2 of 9 ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning: The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property for commercial use. The site's present R -1 zoning classification is not consistent with this land use designation. The request is to rezone the site to General Business with a PDO overlay to allow multiple buildings on the site with shared access and parking. The table below illustrates the existing and proposed land use designation and zoning. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning R -1, Single Family Proposed Zoning GB, General Business Site Vacant Commercial North Residential Residential R -1, Single Family Building height South Ag/undeveloped Commercial R -3/R -1 36 percent East Residential Residential R -1 West Residential Commercial • GB/R -1 Lot Size and Setbacks: The lot and building performance standards for properties in the GB, General Business District are outlined in the table below. GB District Requirement Proposed Lot size minimum 20,000 sq. ft. 163,314 sq. ft. Lot width minimum 100 feet 1000 + feet Setbacks — building from local street from collector rear lot line side lot line from residential district Setbacks — parking from street rear lot line side lot line 30 feet 40 feet 30 feet 10 Feet 35 feet 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet 50 + feet 80 + feet 40 + feet 40+ feet 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet Building height 45 feet 28 feet Green space 35 percent w/ PDO 36 percent As shown above, the proposed development has been found to meet all of the standards outlined. • Building: The applicant is proposing to construct three buildings and a canopy for gas islands totaling 30,266 square feet. This breaks down to building A at 13,720 square feet, Spirit Hills. Page 3 of 9 building B at 6,440 square feet, building C at 7,606 square feet plus the canopy is 2,500 square feet in size. The buildings are generally designed with peaked roofs with focus features at selected ends of the buildings. The highest points of the buildings measure approximately 28' feet in height and conform with the maximum 45 -foot height requirement imposed in the GB District. The buildings are proposed to be finished with rock face block and stucco (EIFS) sign banding and accents. Standing seam metal roof at varying heights will be the roofing materials. The proposed mix of materials conform to the standards in Section 3, Subdivision 4.B of the City Code. Trash Enclosure: The site plan does illustrate exterior trash handling areas. According to Section 3, Subd. 4.G of the Ordinance, all refuse and recyclable materials must be stored within the principal building or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear yard) that is totally screened from eye level view from neighboring uses and public rights of way. The applicant is aware of the provision and has placed the enclosures upon the site plan. There are now two 10' x 10' foot enclosures with brick walls and gates. The first enclosure is located behind Building A along the western lot line. The second enclosure belonging to Building B (the bank) is located in the southwest corner of the lot along Birch St., this is not permitted. The enclosure for Building B may be better suited if placed behind the building along the western lot line away from Birch St. Both enclosures will be surrounded by landscaping to soften the look of the enclosure. The plan states that waste for Building C will be stored within the building. Signage: Signage on the site is proposed to be individual letters mounted over the storefronts. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and requires a separate permit. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications and must satisfy applicable requirements of the Ordinance in regard to sign type size and location. Landscaping: As shown on the landscape plan, a variety of trees shrubs and ornamental plantings are proposed on site. A heavier landscaping treatment is included along Ware Road which separates the proposed development from existing single - family residential uses. A fence six feet in height was provided by the developer on the east side of Ware Rd. at the time of development of the single - family residential area. The proposed Amur Maples have been replaced with less invasive species. Landscaping, in the form of deciduous or coniferous trees, should be extended along the west property line. Parking: The standards for calculating the off -street parking requirements for Retail Store and Service Establishment are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. Spirit Hills. Page 4 of 9 Use Gross Area 90% of Gross Area Ratio Required Spaces Retail/Service 30,266 s.f. 27,240 s.f. One space per 200 s.f. 136 As shown in the table above, a total of 136 off -street parking stalls are required for the proposed use. Because this will be a multi -tenant building, a general parking ratio has been applied. The applicant's plan calls for 138 stalls including the gas island areas. Thirty-six (36) spaces are proposed to be constructed with a pervious Netlawn turf. The use of the Netlawn allows the applicant to satisfy parking requirements while reducing the site's impervious surface area and maximizing on -site infiltration of storm water run -off. Five handicap parking stalls are required one of which must be van accessible. These have been provided. Roads, Access, Circulation: The standards for access and traffic circulation are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code and illustrated in the table below: The subject property meets all of the requirements of this section. Two access points into the site are proposed. The northern access utilizes the existing Ware Road/Ware Circle intersection. The southern access is located approximately 220 feet north of the Ware Road/Birch Street intersection. The proposed southern access location maximizes the separation from both the Ware Road/Ware Circle and Ware Road/Birch Street intersections. The City Engineer has indicated that the proposed development will necessitate the need for a right turn lane from Ware Road onto Birch Street. A five (5) foot concrete sidewalk is proposed along Ware Road, extending from Birch Street to Sioux Lane, to facilitate pedestrian access to the site. Maintenance of the sidewalk shall be the responsibility of the commercial development. A connection to a future trail along Birch Street is also proposed on the plan. Following the City Council meeting on August 12, 2002 the developer prepared a traffic analysis to define the impact of the proposed development on the Ware Road/Birch Street and Hodgson Road/Birch Street intersections. The conclusions of the report indicate that, subject to the improvements required by Anoka County on CSAH 10 (Birch Street), construction of a right Required/Allowed Proposed Curbing Perimeter curbing Perimeter curbing Curb Opening 36 feet 30 feet Access Drive 24 feet 24 feet Stall Width 9 feet 9 feet Stall Depth 18 feet 18 feet The subject property meets all of the requirements of this section. Two access points into the site are proposed. The northern access utilizes the existing Ware Road/Ware Circle intersection. The southern access is located approximately 220 feet north of the Ware Road/Birch Street intersection. The proposed southern access location maximizes the separation from both the Ware Road/Ware Circle and Ware Road/Birch Street intersections. The City Engineer has indicated that the proposed development will necessitate the need for a right turn lane from Ware Road onto Birch Street. A five (5) foot concrete sidewalk is proposed along Ware Road, extending from Birch Street to Sioux Lane, to facilitate pedestrian access to the site. Maintenance of the sidewalk shall be the responsibility of the commercial development. A connection to a future trail along Birch Street is also proposed on the plan. Following the City Council meeting on August 12, 2002 the developer prepared a traffic analysis to define the impact of the proposed development on the Ware Road/Birch Street and Hodgson Road/Birch Street intersections. The conclusions of the report indicate that, subject to the improvements required by Anoka County on CSAH 10 (Birch Street), construction of a right Spirit Hills. Page 5 of 9 turn lane on southbound Ware Road, and extension of Ware Road to CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road), a Level of Service (LOS) A can be maintained at the Ware /CSAH 10 intersection. The analysis further indicates that the intersection of CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) and CSAH 10 (Birch Street) will continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS regardless of the proposed development. Improvement of this intersection will be dependent 011 reconstruction by Anoka County. It is anticipated that this will be a 2004 or 2005 project. Additionally, staff has investigated the possibility of restriping the Hodgson/Birch Street intersection to allow an additional southbound through lane. Anoka County has stated that this cannot be accommodated with the existing pavement configuration. Lighting: A plan has been submitted for review. The ordinance provides for maximum lighting levels of one -foot candle at the street and 0.4 when casting light onto a residential property. Glare can be an issue from fixtures even if foot -candle measurements are met. Because of proximity to residential uses the type of fixture will be critical. The ordinance requires that light sources be hooded or controlled. The fixture proposed is a decorative, round cutoff luminaries that has the option of a solid dome or a glow dome. Staff believes all of the lights should include a solid dome. The submitted plan does show a combination of domes. No specific lighting type has been provided for under the canopy. Lighting under the canopy shall be designed with completely recessed lighting and no lighting on the canopy sides. Grading and Drainage: The submitted erosion and grading plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002, are attached. Utilities: The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002, are attached. Easements: All standard easements are to be dedicated with the fmal plat. There is an existing drainage and utility easement to be vacated that was previously platted with the Spirit Hills subdivision; this shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit. Park Dedication: Park dedication has not previously been satisfied on this parcel. As a result, the proposed final plat will be subject to park dedication requirements. For commercial development, a park dedication requirement of $2,175.00 per acre is required. The plat includes 3.75 acres, which requires a park dedication of $8,156.25 to be paid prior to recording the final plat. Proposed Use: The development is intended to be used for Retail and Service uses consistent with the GB, General Business District. Three uses proposed on the plan include a Day Care Facility, Motor Fuel Station (Convenience Store) and Bank with Drive -Thru, which require a Conditional Use Permit. Approval of these uses are included as part of the PDO approval but are identified here for clarity in what will be permitted. The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: Spirit Hills. Page 6 of 9 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. Comment: Bank drive -thru, child day care and service station uses currently exist within the City of Lino Lakes. None of the uses should be detrimental or endanger the public. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. Comment: The comprehensive plan guides for commercial use of this site. Once rezoned from R -1 to General Business the site would match the comprehensive plan. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Comment: The building designs include many windows and rock face block. The design will be carried through on all four sides of the buildings. This should help make the buildings more attractive. Landscaping and fencing should soften the development and help screen the use from residents. The added sidewalk should be beneficial for pedestrians. Restrictions on canopy lighting, outside audio, hours of operation, and limited delivery hours will minimize the fueling station impacts to existing residential properties. 4. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including street, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Comment: The proposal should be served adequately by such facilities and services. 5. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Comment: This development should not increase public costs, nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 6. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Comment: The proposed commercial uses upon this site should not create any excessive externalities that would be abnormal to the character of commercial sites. 7. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. Spirit Hills. Page 7 of 9 Comment: The site layout meets standards held within the City's zoning ordinance including turn lanes, access width, and access spacing/location. 8. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Comment: The applicant is currently working with the RCWD to satisfy the remaining mitigation requirements through a comprehensive drainage plan for the site, future Ware Road extension and surrounding properties. 9. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. Comment: Each use should conform to the specific standards listed within the General Business section of the zoning ordinance. Specifically, the day care should meet the requirements listed under Section 7 H (11)(a). Environmental Board: The Environmental Board reviewed the proposed development on April 24, 2002 and recommended approval. Their comments are attached and, where applicable, have been incorporated into this report. Rice Creek Watershed District Review: The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) granted a TWAFAA (Table With Authorization For Administration Action) on February 27, 2002, pending resolution of Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) issues. The applicant is proposing to fill 8,000 square feet of existing wetland on the site. 3,041 square feet is proposed to be mitigated on -site. The applicant is currently working with the RCWD to satisfy the remaining mitigation requirements through a comprehensive drainage plan for the site, future Ware Road extension and surrounding properties. The wetland delineations have been approved and RCWD has agreed to work with the applicant to create the best solution for wetland impacts and protection. No permit for the work at Spirit Hills will be issued until the overall impacts are addressed during the Ware Road permitting process. Anoka County Highway Department: Anoka County has completed its review of the proposed development. Their comments, dated August 29, 2002, are attached. In general the County is requesting the construction of both westbound and eastbound left and right turn lanes on CSAH 10 (Birch Street). These improvements will need to be constructed in conjunction with the proposed development. The proposed improvements are not included within the City or County Capital Improvement Programs. Therefore, it will be the responsibility of the developer to construct and finance the proposed improvements as a condition of the development approval. Site Improvement Performance Agreement: Prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant will be required to enter into a performance agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. Spirit Hills. Page 8 of 9 Planning & Zoning Board: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application at their July meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: A. Approval of rezoning the site to GB, General Business and approval of the PDO overlay subject to the following conditions: 1. The site and buildings shall be developed as outlined on the plans dated 3/4/02 and last revised 6/12/02. 2. A sidewalk shall be installed along the frontage of Ware Road and shall be maintained by the commercial development. 3. The PDO shall include the CUP's for the Motor Fuel Station (Convenience Store), Bank Drive -Thru and Day Care subject to the requirements of Section 7, Subdivision 3, H(2), H(5) and H(11), respectively of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. Site and Building Plan approval to allow the construction of 30,266 square feet in three buildings and canopy as configured on the site plan dated received June 14, 2002 1. All refuse and recyclable materials shall be stored within the principal building or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear yard) that is totally screened from eye level view from neighboring uses and public rights of way. 2. All signs shall be reviewed with the sign permit applications and shall be required the applicable requirements of the Ordinance. 3. Light fixture design is a solid dome variety only and under- canopy lighting shall be submitted and subject to staff approval. 4. The submitted erosion and grading plan shall be revised to incorporate the City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002. 5. The submitted utility plan shall be revised to incorporate the City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002. 6. Stop signs shall be installed and maintained at the access points with the public road. 7. The Rice Creek Watershed District issues a permit to allow the development proposal and the conditions required by it are fulfilled. 8. A Watershed District Permit is received prior to City building permit issuance. 9. A final plat and vacation of easements shall be submitted and approved by the City. The plat shall also include dedication of access control, along Birch Street, to Anoka County. Spirit Hills. Page 9 of 9 10. Prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant enters into a performance agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. 11. No exterior audio system associated with the site. 12. Limiting hours of operations from 5:00 a.m. to 11:30 p.m for the fueling station. 13. Subject to Anoka County traffic approval. 14. The net lawn spaces be noted and marked. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning, conditional use permit and site and building plans as setforth in Ordinance No. 08 -02 and Resolution No. 02 -88. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 08 -02 2. Resolution No. 02 -88 3. City Engineers Report 4. CPTED Review 5. Anoka County Review 6. Site Plan 7. Grading and Drainage Plan 8. Utility Plan 9. Landscaping Plan 10. Building Elevations CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 08-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO PDO, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION L FINDINGS The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1E of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for commercial uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for commercial uses. Land in the area of the site is already developed with commercial uses or designated for such use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are currently available to the site. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property in conjunction with the public improvements proposed. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residential to PDO, Planned Development Overlay pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: Outlot A, Spirit Hills Ordinance 08 -02 Page 2 SECTION 2. DISTRICT PROVISIONS A. Development of the property shall be subject to City Site and Building Plan approval. Such plans shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary development plans shown on the following exhibits: Exhibit A Site grading, drainage, and erosion control plat dated 2/1302 and revised 6/12/02 Exhibit B Site Plan dated 3/4/02 and revised 6/12/02 Exhibit C Utility Plan dated 3/5/02 and revised 6/12/02 Exhibit D Landscaping and tree preservation plan dated 3/11/02 and revised 6/12/02 Exhibit E Building Elevations dated 7/10/02 Exhibit F Lighting Plan dated received 3/11/02 Permitted Uses. Permitted Uses shall be those uses within the General Business District as set forth in Section 7, Subdivision 3(E) of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. C. Conditional Uses. Conditional Use Permits are approved for the following uses: 1. Motor Fuel Station subject to the following conditions: a. No exterior audio system shall be used in the operation of the facility. b. No illuminated signage shall be allowed on the protective canopy except for the south side facing Birch Street. c. The hours of operation shall be limited to 5:00 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. d. Deliveries to the station shall be limited to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. 2. Accessory Drive- through facility (Bank). 3. Day Care Facility Nursery Facility subject to the following conditions: a. All requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services, as may be amended, are satisfactory met and the structure and operation is licensed accordingly. SECTION 3. SPECIAL PROVISIONS A. Minor variations from the approved plans may be approved by the City's Development Review Committee, under the direction of the Community Development Director. Substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). Ordinance 08 -02 Page 3 B. Unless otherwise specified herein the development shall be subject to the provisions of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable chapters of City Code. C. Commencement of development on the subject property in conformance with the plans attached hereto, shall be subject to the execution of a Performance Agreement by and between the City of Lino Lakes and the owner of said property. SECTION 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of October, 2002 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, Deputy Clerk CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-88 RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR SPIRIT HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL CENTER WHEREAS, the City has received an application for site and building plan approval for a development consisting of three buildings totaling 30,266 square feet; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: Outlot A Spirit Hills ;and WHEREAS, the site and building plan approval request is based on the following plans prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies and related correspondence: Site grading, drainage, and erosion control plat dated 2/1302 and revised 6/12/02 Site Plan dated 3/4/02 and revised 6/12/02 Utility Plan dated 3/5/02 and revised 6/12/02 Landscaping and tree preservation plan dated 3/11/02 and revised 6/12/02 Building Elevations dated 7 /10/02 Lighting Plan dated received 3/11/02 Environmental Board Comments dated 4/24/02 ;and WHEREAS, at their meeting on July 10, 2002, the Planning & Zoning Board considered the site and building plan application and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the site and building plan subject to the following conditions: 1. A sidewalk shall be installed along the frontage of Ware Road and shall be maintained by the commercial development. 2. All refuse and recyclable materials shall be stored within the principal building or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear yard) that is totally screened from eye level view from neighboring uses and public rights of way. 3. All signs shall be reviewed with the sign permit applications and shall be required the applicable requirements of the Ordinance. 4. Light fixture design is a solid dome variety only and under- canopy lighting shall be submitted and subject to staff approval. 5. The submitted erosion and grading plan shall be revised to incorporate the City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002. 6. The submitted utility plan shall be revised to incorporate the City Engineer's comments, dated July 3, 2002. 7. Stop signs shall be installed and maintained at the access points with the public road. 8. The Rice Creek Watershed District issues a permit to allow the development proposal and the conditions required by it are fulfilled. 9. A Watershed District Permit is received prior to City building permit issuance. 10. A final plat and vacation of easements shall be submitted and approved by the City. The plat shall also include dedication of access control, along Birch Street, to Anoka County. 11. Prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant enters into a performance agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. 12. Improvements to CSAH 10 (Birch Street) shall be constructed in accordance with the Anoka County Highway Departments requirements as setforth in the August 29, 2002 review letter. The developer shall be responsible for the construction and financing of such improvements. 13. The net lawn spaces be noted and marked. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of September, 2002. ATTEST: Ann Blair, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor Memorandum DATE: July 3, 2002 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer jg RE: Spirit Hills (Previously Village Hills) Site Plan Review A site plan review of the submitted documents including a six -page drawing set dated June 12, 2002, and drainage calculations dated June 20, 2002, for the proposed Spirit Hills site has been performed. The plans generally meet City requirements. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this site plan: Watermain: - Part of the watermain is mislabeled as 6" DIP between two 8" DIP pipe sizes. Sanitary Sewer: Meets City standards. Street Standards: - Turning movements of trucks within the site must be confirmed. - Sidewalk along Ware Road north of Birch Street has unacceptable cross slope. - Right turn lane onto Birch Street is under review. Storm Sewer /Drainage: Attached is a memorandum dated June 26, 2002, which addresses the storm sewer and drainage design. Plat: - - Plat must show drainage and utility easements. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE 851/292.4400 FAX: 851/292 -0083 Jim Studenski Reference: Drainage Review for Copies To: John Powell Spirit Hills Center (Village Hills) From: Scott A. Brink City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date: June 26, 2002 Commission No. 12475 -002 The following documents, submitted on June 24, 2002, to the City of Lino Lakes, were used to review the proposed Spirit Hills Center, Site, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet l of 6): 1. Plan set dated February 13, 2002, revised June 21, 2002, and signed on June 21, 2002 (full size and half size copies provided) 2. HydroCAD calculations dated June 20, 2002 3. TKDA memorandum from Stephen Hartley dated May 1, 2002 After reviewing the above documents, I have the following comments: General Comments: In order to provide for better understanding and clarification of the Plan, the following information should be provided: 1. Grading notes should be numbered and referenced to and from the Plan accordingly. 2. It is not noted on the Plan whether the spot elevations provided are existing or proposed. They are presumed to be proposed, but must be distinguished and stated clearly on the Plan. There are some spots (particularly between buildings at the south end of the site) that do not show clearly that they will drain. In addition, drainage flow direction should be more clearly defined at the site entrances (i.e., drainage to Ware Road vs. on site, etc.) 3. Denotations on the Plan such as FL, FCL, LP, D etc., should be noted in a glossary or index as to what they identify or stand for. An Equal Opportunity Employer Memo - Drainage Review for Page 2 June 26, 2002 Spirit Hills Center (Village Hills) City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4. There are some differences between the full size and half size copies provided. For example, hatched areas do not show up on the full size Plan, and the location of curb and gutter differs between copies. Other Comments 1. The Plan must note or reference that all curbing shall be B612 concrete curb and gutter as required by the City. Curb cuts must be noted on the Plan where it is intended to drain to infiltration areas. The location of curb and gutter must be clearly shown and referenced to the City standard accordingly. 2. The Plan must show specifically where silt fence is to be installed (essentially all locations where any runoff can leave the site). 3. All disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched immediately, or within a maximum of two weeks from final disturbance. The "future" mitigation at the SE corner of the site is labeled "if necessary ". It would appear that the detention area is necessary, regardless, since permanent drainage from the site is being routed to this location. The expected HW should be noted on the Plan, and the overflow route (to Birch Street) must be better defined to indicate what the effects on Birch Street may be. 5. A shaded area is shown on the NW side of the property, between the driveway and pond, along with a note stating "Tuff Turf' swale. The shading must be referenced in a glossary or index with the other cross hatching, and a specific reference or detail to "Tuff Turf" must be provided. It is presumed that "Tuff Turf" is an industry trademarked product, and it must be referenced and/or specified and described accordingly. 6. The entire wetland mitigation work for this site is very confusing. Notes on the Plan referring to mitigation should reference to the note describing the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed. Re- delineations in the spring of 2002, future mitigations if necessary, etc. are stated on the Plan. If such re- delineations have been performed, they should be incorporated into the Plan accordingly. Mitigation areas should also be clearly defined and outlined. This Plan shall not be considered approved until the Watershed has reviewed and approved the Plan accordingly. Again, the mitigation work shown for this site is not clear and must be clarified and detailed on the Plan in accordance with the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. A reference or detail for "Netlon Advanced Turf' and "Netavator" must be provided. It is presumed that this is an industry trademarked product, and it must be referenced and/or specified accordingly. • • Memo - Drainage Review for Page 3 Spirit Hills Center (Village Hills) June 26, 2002 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 8. Rock entrances shall be provided at all construction site access points. 9. A note is provided stating that grading on Larry Grubbs' property is permitted. It is not shown on the Plan where this property is located, or exactly what may or may not be permitted. The note should be revised to state that no grading shall be allowed beyond the site property, unless the Contractor attains authorization from adjoining property owners accordingly. The Contractor shall be responsible for any disturbances or encroachment upon adjoining private properties. 10. A note is provided stating adding peat and topsoil to root zone mixing. This must be more clearly explained as to where, what, etc. Reference to an appropriate specification or detail is needed. 11. Previous correspondence indicated that a right turn lane from southbound Ware Road to Birch Street will be needed. This should be reflected on the Plan to adjust the site grading accordingly. Storm Notes 1. A note should be included that all storm sewer pipe, manholes, and appurtenances shall adhere to the requirements and standards of the City of Lino Lakes. 2. For the PS -NW Outlet Structure, the normal elevation of the pond must be provided on the Plan. The outlet and ditch to Rice Lake must be reviewed and approved by the Watershed District to assure that the outlet is adequate. Drainage Calculations 1. HydroCAD Drainage Calculations have been provided. However, a site plan (existing and proposed) with specific drainage areas highlighted must be provided to allow for adequate review of the calculations. 2. The retention pond at the north side of the property must provide a permanent pool size that meets NURP standards in accordance with the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City of Lino Lakes. A preliminary observation suggests that the pond is undersized. The Developer's Engineer shall submit calculations demonstrating that the project's storm water detention system does meet the treatment requirements of the Watershed and the City. Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director / Chief of Police Officer Mike Rumpsa Lino Lakes Police Department 08 -02 -02 CPTED Review: Spirit Hills Commercial Development I have reviewed the plans for Spirit Hills and have a couple of comments. Traffic is going to be the most obvious problem. It appears that Ware Rd should be fine North of Birch St. On the other hand, Birch St will cause some trouble to motorists. Vehicles leaving the shopping center will have to merge on to Birch St. During the busy times, motorists attempting to travel E/B Birch St from Ware Rd will have a difficult time entering the traffic flow. Every day, Birch Street becomes congested during the morning and afternoon rush hour. Motorists heading E/B Birch Street from Hodgson Rd are just getting up to speed when they approach Ware Rd. Additionally; residents that live in the developments North/South of Birch are using Ware Rd to gain Access to Birch St. This makes the intersection of Ware Rd and Birch Street extremely busy and potentially dangerous. Ware Rd is controlled by stop signs on either side of Birch St. I have observed many motorists get frustrated waiting for a natural break in traffic so that they can enter the traffic flow on Birch St from Ware Rd. Now add the additional traffic that will be generated by the Spirit Hills Commercial Center. Motorists no doubt will be taking chances that they normally would not, to gain access to Birch Street. The only remedy that I can see to minimize the risk of property and personal injury accidents is to make the intersection of Birch St and Ware Rd, a controlled intersection. I also received a lighting plan for the complex, but I was unable to read the lighting values. 640 Town Center Parkway • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1182 COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 -4005 (763) 862 -4200 FAX (763) 862 -4201 August 29, 2002 Mike Grochala City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, ivNV 55014 RE: Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Spirit Hills (Formerly Village Hills Commercial) Dear Mike, We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat/Site Plan for Spirit Hills (formerly Village Hills Commercial) to be located north of CSAH 10 (Birch St,) and West of Ware Rd. within the City of Lino Lakes, and I offer the following comments: Existing right -of -way adjacent to CSAH 10 should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes (60ft r/w north of the CSAH 10 r/w centerline). Additional right -of -way in the form of trail/utility easements and/or construction easements may be required at some time in the future. It appears that some clearing and/or grading may be required in order to meet intersection sight distance requirements at the CSAH 10/Birch St intersection. The City and/or the developer shall . ensure that all applicable intersection sight distance requirements are met to the fullest extent possible for this development. Care should be exercised when locating landscaping/berms /trees /signs outside the county right -of -way, so as not to create sight distance obstructions for vehicles entering/exiting this site. Right -of- access along CSAH 10 is to be dedicated to Anoka County. Contact Mike Kelly, Chief Right -of -way Agent, to coordinate the preparation of the appropriate documents for the right -of- access dedication. All access for this site is to be made via Ware Road, which is acceptable to this department. However, the construction of this development will cause a significant increase in the number of turning movements at the intersection of CSAH 10 and Ware Road. As a consequence, in order to provide for the safety needs of the traveling public, turn lane construction on CSAH 10 will be required to be completed in conjunction with this development. The turn lane construction shall consist of EB CSAH 10 left and right turn lanes, as well as WB CSAH 10 right and left turn lanes. Standard turn lanes are 12 -14ft wide, 300ft in length, and include a 15:1 taper. In addition, speed:1 transitions are standard with the introduction of left turn lanes on a county highway. We will not require the construction of raised median channelization on CSAH 10 at this time, but will instead accept painted median channelization. Please contact Kirsten Olson, Design Engineer, for further information regarding the pavement section and design details for the turn lane construction. Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer • • Calculations must be provided along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage areas for this site. The post - development rate /volume of runoff must not exceed the pre - developed rate /volume of runoff for the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm, utilizing the "SCS Method" of design. If any culverts are required within the county right -of -way, they shall include 6:1 safety grates and aprons. A permit for work within the County Right -of -Way is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. License Permit Bonding, method of construction, design details, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow -up inspections are typical elements oft the permitting process. Please contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician, for further information regarding the permit process. Installation and any necessary permanent traffic control devices within the County Right -of -Way for this proposed development will be coordinated, installed and maintained by the Anoka County Highway Department in conjunction with the permit process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, e Pemble Traffic Engineer XC: 2002 Lino Lakes File Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator Mike Kelly, Chief Right -of -Way Agent Larry Hoium, County Surveyor Josie Scott, Permit Technician Tom Hornsby, Traffic Services Supervisor — Signs Kirsten Olson, Design Engineer aura N/38H3 NN379 \ / VlOS3NNIN `S3NV1 ONII \ •ON! `STIIH lidldS d31N30 S11IH 1 dldS • ig , NV1d 3JJS m 0 V . IQ) 10 1C .Q)' W z. W 0 J J S L-b0� 3 „8S1j7i7.00N Moa aui s .a PV PC OnC 4. 5§4 ;9 E 1511t a t o s ..4a 071g °' - s e eeve �r000 V ? ° ; O S 6 a.5_ sp ,.g .52b02 0S Co c 5 c v c .5p $ V ^ °`9 2 ° o 0 °3 ; U m 3° rE .. fi_ c c * ° i° ea a. `m s m a . `1, 0 11: `$ it. Z 3,13 o o m c a m °u n 0 O ° : i -4 4 `q 8CC oo .773'.:: E t° V o ao�oz xaeE a oo Q a°� ° oaf j N V v., a��'� cu0 0 0. • N7 qO 3mA9Q O� ,^Qp 8r80Big. o5 icg > .j0 mama nm m and `y o ° - ° . 0 c 0.00 mezzanines/200 8 (l. rise in 100 horizontal U2 g W DO 446,, SZ N - O' 0 K �� ZF R3 6' a o z� �i ca o 6 5f• m gW8 W ZW w W b N 0 O ~ M Xg �I'02 W,3 O 0 WW W TF • FE K m Z o Z m ' F J m p aOap ia JJ O (1�� 151 2gr g. H.O w <W00 v N ^� waI�IINO "4 cwi,a a wwa in" 8o Ca o`a pzdXz 0a� Da0�0 W ZZ On <W H Wy ii.cC9v 5 p,.,.z d� <Q00 =iza3 � SOe,yIos z 1i� 4RV «NZ HJ2C3wC<O > gg ^001.12 Jz6Z� P,T. J'o «_sa i_ z• -aw� g12w, 33aoo yrc11z�1oo0 NJw <1o��oa2N Oo6= wgW- O00Id 1 H 2,3 „,„ W702.,w W5Z =W=N O ggg. WWUC �WZW- NZS> t..,> ZHW -,-, -{G NNWWNd NO V,L,6 2I20p ! p7ci3 N 66�aD J F-- Z O V V10S3NNIW `S3)Itll ONI1 'ON! `S-11IH 1IIIdS d31N3O S1I11H 1IdIdS Ed INo IOISON) ONV 10E019111O CIS Y z cno owz Viz¢ �w .-Wz W.E. E GU C.4 wCFW wzz CZ yvvi MAO I ,1 ni I 0 0 {IE • W } -- - - -- 01 I 4R)) 0 • 0 • 1 1 M / m 0 X I i to a / O).' i C rn m / O r W co / U)in i w 45 # O . /TS 0 i N/38H3 NN37J C\2 YlOS3NNIW 'S3)IY1 ONII 'OM `S11IH lI?IIdS d31N33 SI1IH lldldS NYId NOfYi\83338d 3381 ONIdYOSONY' r s $s 4:f; R.o Y. 11 11 I I I I II c6' ° IIU IC IN 0 c 0 TREE PRESERVATION 1p `�'_ f v14W P X4111, .� _ ii � �_ �l . �i�-T a �—« _ 141111 ,. e o> MUM 9 2 c s 2 411 t[ J ga p >'r i11. vxao °eg.9h 9.:R; s a 1 4 1 9 9 2 2 9 1 3 1 1 IA 8e 1 i z la 1 a 1 1 1 2 m b 0 :IOM z w 6 J 2 0 a CC {W 1 Z W z n Cr J J cQ O CC C/) AGENDA ITEM 7 G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution 02 -122, Accept Drainage & Utility Easements, Lots 3 -6, Lakes Addition No. 2 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND Lakes Addition #2 was platted in the 1980s. Subsequently, there was some legal activity regarding the buildability of some of the lots in Lakes Addn. #2 and Lakes Addn. #3. In the end, among other things, a separate drainage and utility easement covering portions of several lots was to be dedicated to the City. This was to cover a wet area. However, this easement was never recorded. We have received a new easement grant document from the current owner, who has requested that the City accept the easement to clear up the issue. The City should accept this easement so it can be recorded. As indicated on the attachments to Resolution 02 -122, the drainage and utility easement covers the eastern portions of Lots 3 -6. The resolution states that the City Council accepts these easements. Once the resolution is approved, the title company will send us the original deed for City signatures. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 02 -122. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-122 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, LOTS 3 -6, BLOCK 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2 WHEREAS, a drainage and utility easement was to be deeded to the City as part of platting and other legal agreements in 1989, and WHEREAS, the easement covers parts of Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 7, Lakes Addition No. 2, and WHEREAS, the easement was never recorded, and WHEREAS, the City has received a legal description for the easment across those lots, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the easements described in Attachment A. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2002. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk AUG.13'2002 14:43 763 427 0009 • REGISTERED ABSTRACTERS *4616 P.002/005 RESOLUTION 02 -122 ATTACHMENT A rXBIBET "A" An easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: That part. of Lot 3, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, lying eastely of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 67.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lox to a point on the south line of said lot distant 86.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot. And The South 10.00 feet of the West 70.00 feet. of Lot. 3, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat thereof. And That part of Lot 4, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 80.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on tbe south line of said lot distant 68.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said; lot. And The North 10.00 feet of the West 70.00 feet of Lot: 4, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat. thereof. And That part of Lot 5, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, lying easterly' of at line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 68.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner or said lot to a point on the south line of said lot distant: 60.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot. And That part of Lot 6, Block 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of a line drawn from o point on the north line of said lot distant. 60.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on the south line of said lot distant 67.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot. i3.3J !V.J 3G! VVV7 1 •� 1 q 1ltiVlJYLil1..L ADJ InAVIGRJ I0 I 0 A` Q� ZI 01 67.00 - - -- _ /-1 I11 z1 (1 ¢I wl 86.00 �3 80.00 4 --t- ho _7 fsnlo r.vuJ /uuD • • • AGENDA ItEM NO. 7H STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jim Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution 02 -127, Consideration of Accepting Bids and Award Contract of Tri-Plex Panel for Lift Station No. 4 Vote Required: 3/5 Vote BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened on September 12, 2002 for the construction and installation of a new tri-plex lift station panel. This replacement of the panel on Lift Station #4 is to accommodate the increased flow due to expansion within the city. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID SyCom, Inc. $22,189 Total Control, Inc. $27,600 In Control, Inc. $31,538 City staff is recommending that the contract be awarded to SyCom, Inc. in the amount of $22,189. Funding for this project is the area- and -unit fund. The substantial completion date for this project is December 15, 2002. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 02 -127. 2. Return to staff for further review. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 02 -127. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. sw /rick/Green Sheet Resolution 02 -127 Accept Bids and Award Contract of Tri-Plex Panel for Lift Station No. 4 • ordinance and moved its adoption. Council Member introduced the following • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-127 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT OF TRI -PLEX PANEL FOR LIFT STATION NO. 4 WHEREAS, the City advertised for bids for the construction and installation of a new Tri-Plex Panel for Lift Station No. 4 and; WHEREAS, the City accepted three sealed bids and publicly opened them on September 12, 2002 and; WHEREAS, the lowest bid was received by SyCom, Inc. in the amount of $22,189 and; WHEREAS, the substantial completion date for the project is December 15, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, that the lowest bid be accepted and awarded to SyCom, Inc. in the amount of $22,189. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd Day of September, 2002. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blaire, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. sw /rick/resolution 02- 127.doc • AGENDA ITEM 71 STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution No. 02 -129, Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, Elm Street Reconstruction. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Due to the deteriorating condition of Elm Street between Sunset Road and Grey Heron Drive, the City Council order a feasibility study for the reconstruction of the street. This segment of roadway is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street and serves as a minor collector within the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. In addition, some properties adjacent to and beyond Elm Street do not have access to sanitary sewer or water. Staff is currently working with the City Attorney defining the assessments that are being proposed for this project. The street reconstruction portion of the project will be funded mostly through Municipal State Aid. The study will be delivered to the City Council at the meeting Monday evening. The next step in the process will be to accept the feasibility study and hold a Public Hearing on the proposed improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 02 -129, Accepting the Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing for the Elm Street Reconstruction project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 02 -129 be adopted. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-129 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING — ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2001, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Elm Street Reconstruction by constructing Street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain extensions, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The report is hereby received by the City Council. 2. That a Public Hearing be held for the proposed street reconstruction, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water extensions. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of September, 2002. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor AGENDA ITEM 7J STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 23, 2002 TOPIC: Resolution No. 02 -130, Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, 62nd Street Reconstruction. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Due to the continued development and growth of the area increasing the traffic on this roadway and the deteriorating condition of 62nd Street between Ware Road and Red Maple Lane, the City Council order a feasibility study for the reconstruction of the street. This segment of roadway is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street and serves as a minor collector within the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. In addition, some properties adjacent to and beyond 62nd Street do not have access to sanitary sewer or water. Staff is currently working with the City Attorney defining the assessments that are being proposed for this project. The street reconstruction portion of the project will be funded mostly through Municipal State Aid. The study will be delivered to the City Council at the meeting Monday evening. The next step in the process will be to accept the feasibility study and hold a Public Hearing on the proposed improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 02 -130, Accepting the Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing for the 62nd Street Reconstruction project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 02 -130 be adopted. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02 -130 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING — 62nd STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted August 27, 2001, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of 62nd Street Reconstruction by constructing Street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain extensions, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The report is hereby received by the City Council. 2. That a Public Hearing be held for the proposed street reconstruction, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water extensions. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of September, 2002. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor eTKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Copies To: From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: September 19, 2002 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 651/292 -4400 FAX: 651/292 -0083 Reference: General Items City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 12475 -001 Following is the weekly update through the above date: ITEM 1 Twilight Acres • DESCRIPTION Sanitary Sewer Construction STATUS Variance required (Timing: High Priority). ACTION /OTHER Contractor and MDH reviewing plans. Elm Street (Sunset to Lake Drive) Street and Utilities Feasibility Report to City Council on 9/23/02. 3 62nd Street (Ware Road to Red Maple Lane) 4 Holly Drive (Birch Street to County Road J) 5 Holte Pond Street and Utilities Street and Utilities Feasibility Report to City Council on 9/23/02. Feasibility Report to Council 10 -28. Speed Study nearing completion. Elm Street reconstruction information meeting held for residents on 9/16/02. Updated draft Feasibility Report submitted to City on 9/18/02. Updated draft Feasibility Report submitted to City on 9/18/02. Stormwater Basin Holte removing pond amenities 6 Street Reconstruction Initial Project Projects Development 7 West Shadow Ponds Street and Utilities Developing Schedule for 2003. Developer grading complete. Phasing of project being reviewed. TKDA met with City staff on 9/16/02. Additional surveys being performed. Property owners informed of removal work. Meeting with RCWD (Rice Creek Watershed District) scheduled for 9/23/02. Referendum required. Construction has commenced. 8 21st Avenue N.E. Roadway 9 Marshan Lane Roadway 10 Clearwater Creek 5th Addition 1 Royal Pines Street and Utilities (Gor -em, LLC) Private Development Authorization in process. City Attorney reviewing options. Contractor installing utilities. Private utilities installed. Both Cities approved Joint Powers Agreement 9/9/02 and 9/11/02. City Council tabled project at 9/9/02 Council Meeting. Developer agreement approved 8/26/02 by City Council. Street construction completed. An Equal Opportunity Employer Status Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota September 19, 2002 2 12 77th Street at Lake Dr. Re- Alignment of 77th Street with Signal at Lake Dr. /Target Development. Revised concept drawings sent to City for review on 9/16/02. 13 Spirit Hills (Birch St. Private at Ware Road) Development - Rehbein Drainage reviewed - comments forwarded to City. City Reviewing 14 Ware Road (Birch Street to County Road J) 15 Otter Lake Drive 16 Highland Meadows Pond 17 JADT Completed Project - Submit Final Report to State Aid. Joint County /City Project Project Complete. Pond left uncompleted. Private Development .8 Surface Water Miscellaneous Management Projects Projects Report of Final Estimate. Final Payment made. Incomplete Transfer of property to County needs to be initiated. City and County are in process of resolving. Locate grading plan; City is following up. Grading Plan has received RCWD *TWAFAA Planning and Zoning Approval on 8/14/02 City Council approved on 9/9/02. Projects to be determined. City and TKDA to review further, and determine specific projects and schedule as feasible. 19 Park Projects 20 Shoreview Water Meter In Development Joint Powers Agreement with City of Shoreview. City and TKDA will pursue further Design completed; quotes being requested. 21 Surface Water Management Plan 22 Carl Street Street Extension tied to new development (Behm's Century Farms). TKDA met with City staff on 9/10/02 TKDA submitted traffic review on 9/10/02. City met with RCWD on 9/10/02. Planning and Zoning has given verbal direction to connect subdivision to Carl Street. 23 Clearwater Creek Booster Pump 24 Pheasant Hills Preserve - 12th Addition Booster Station Bids Opened on 8/22/02. Private Development Preconstruction meeting conducted on 9/17/02. City reviewing EAW report (Environmental Assessment Worksheet). 25 Stoneybrook Private Development Development Agreement in Process MUSA allocated; preliminary plat approved. First reading conducted on 8/26/02. Second reading conducted on 9/9/02. 26 Eagle Brook Church Private Development 41,7 Trappers Crossing Private Development *TWAFAA(Tabled With Authorization For Administrative Action) Erosion Issues City reviewing EAW report (Environmental Assessment Worksheet). Resident meeting to be held. City /attorney addressing erosion issues. Status Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota September 19, 2002 It is intended that the table provided above will be revised and adjusted weekly or other as needed. Please direct any questions, revisions, clarification requests, etc. regarding this update to Jim Studenski (651/982 -2430) or Scott Brink of TKDA (651/726- 7904). • •