Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/14/2000 Council Packet• • AGENDA * * * * * * ** *UPDATED AGENDA * * * * * * * ** CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday February 14, 2000 6:30 P.M. SCANNED - Call to Order and Roll Call : Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda A) Consideration of Minutes i) January 19, 2000 City Council Work Session Minutes B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) 1999/ 2000 (Check No. 58124 — 58253 in the amount of $189,092.85; $39,017.85 and $150,075.00 respectively ) ii) Manual Disbursements - $142,868.37 iii) Centennial Fire District C) Consider 2000 Election Judge Appointments for Special Election 2. Open Mike A. Environmental Management Plan Summary - J. P. Houchins, Jeff Schoenbauer and Marty Asleson 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A. Consider Requests for Community Development Block Grant Funds and Adopting Resolution 2000 -18 Designating Community Block Grant for the City of Lino Lakes for funding year 2000 -2001 (3/4 Vote Required) Dan Tesch 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia • • • AGENDA A. Consideration of Resolution No. 2000 -12, Accepting donation from the Centennial Fire District to defer costs to administer the D.A.R. E. Program (3/4 Vote Required) Sargent Bill Hammes 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A. Consideration of Approving Antenna Lease Agreement for Water Tower #1 — AirTouch Cellular (3/4 Vote Required) Rick DeGardner B. Consideration of Accepting 2000 Park Board Goals (3/4 Vote Required) Rick DeGardner C. Consideration of Authorization to Advertise for Brandywood Park Playground Equipment Bids (3/4 Vote Required) Rick DeGardner 6. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A Second Reading, Ordinance No. 01 -2000, Amend Zoning Ordinance to add Temporary Batch Plant as an Interim Use In the LB Zoning District (4/4 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland B. First Reading, Ordinance No. 02 -2000, Amend Zoning Ordinance to add Exterior Storage as a Conditional Use in the LI, Light Industrial Zoning District (4/4 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland C. H. & L. Mesabi, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review & Conditional Use Permit (3/4 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland D. Consider Trappers Crossing 3rd Addition Final Plat Approval (3/4 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland E. Traver Variance Shoreland Setback 6750 W. Shadow Lake Drive (3/4 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland F. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 03 -2000, Rezone a Portion of Highland Meadows to R -3 (4/4 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser G. Consider JADT Final Plat Approval (3/4 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser H. PUBLIC HEARING, First Reading, Ordinance No. 99 -17 Oak Brook Peninsula Easement Vacation (4/4 Vote Required) John Powell (CONTINUED) I. Resolution No. 2000 13, Approve Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Hugo for Water Service (3/4 Vote Required) John Powell J. Resolution No. 2000 -14, Order Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the Cedar Street Improvements (4/4 Vote Required) John Powell Page 2 AGENDA • K. Resolution No. 2000 -15, Easement Grant to US West Communications in the Apollo Business Park (3/4 Vote Required) John Powell L. Resolution No. 2000 -16, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Twilight Acres Utility Improvements (3/4 Vote Required) John Powell M. Resolution No. 2000 -17, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Twilight Acres 2nd Addition Utility Improvements. 7. Unfinished Business 8. New Business 9. Community Calendar, February 14, 2000 through February 28, 2000: A. Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting B. Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Special Council Work Session C. Thursday, February 17, 2000, 6:00 p.m., Special Planning and Zoning Meeting. SD. Monday, February 21, 2000, City Hall Closed in Observance of President's Day E. Monday, February 21, 2000 7:00 p.m., CAG (Meeting Maybe rescheduled) F. Tuesday, February 22, 2000 7:00 a.m. Special Planning & Zoning Meeting G. Wednesday, February 23, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session H. Wednesday, February 23, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting I. Monday, February 28, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting J. Tuesday, March 1, 2000 7:00 a.m., Special Planning & zoning Meeting 10. Adjourn Revised 2/9/2000 1:35 p.m. • Page 3 • EXPENDITURES FEBRUARY 14, 2000 1999 BUDGET • Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 14:02:36 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 680 - 680 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SER MOLITOR PROPERTY * * * * * * ** 1,465.55 O COPELAND BUILDERS REIMBURSE BUILDING ESCRO * * * * * * ** 4,460.00 O NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES * * * * * * ** 4,729.51 O SCHNAPP PLUMBING AND H REIMBURSE WATER METER * * * * * * ** 290.00 Total for Dept ** 10,945.06* O CENTRAL DATA SUPPLY CO TONER ADMINIST 599.60 Total for Dept 402 599.60* O AMERICAN PLANNING ASSO SUBSCRIPTION ECONOMIC 495.00 Total for Dept 415 495.00* O APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SER ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN PLANNING 499.47 O NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLANNING 1,906.71 III Total for Dept 416 2,406.18* O AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, SIREN REPAIR POLICE 160.51 O R & T SPECIALTY SUPPLIES POLICE 217.80 i 0 R_& T SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH BATTERY POLICE 190.10 Total for Dept 420 568.41* 0 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME 2,718.01 O CON -WAY CENTRAL EXPRES SHIPPING CHARGES /PANELS GOVERNME 28.90 0 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL PANELS GOVERNME 633.42 O PLUNKETT'S, INC. PEST CONTROL GOVERNME 10.91 O SCHWAAB, INC. DATER GOVERNME 61.34 Total for Dept 432 3,452.58* O CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 215.69 Total for Dept 450 215.69* O APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SER MOLITOR PROPERTY ENVIRONM 1,758.75 Total for Dept 461 1,758.75* O DNR FORESTRY WATER CALCULATION FEE WATER 884.79 O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, METER INSTALLS WATER 10,737.62 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 14:02:37 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount • • Total for Dept 494 11,622.41* 0 LAKELAND BANK COMPLETION OF PARKING LO OTHER Total for Dept 499 6,954.17 6,954.17* Grand Total 39,017.85* Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 14:00:43 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 670 670 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gros Discount Lost 000009 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. 2 3,723.77 3,723.77 .00 .00 000014 COPELAND BUILDERS 1 4,460.00 4,460.00 .00 .00 000064 LAKELAND BANK 1 6,954.17 6,954.17 .00 .00 000081 R & T SPECIALTY 1 217.80 217.80 .00 .00 000098 SCHNAPP PLUMBING AND HEATING 1 290.00 290.00 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 160.51 160.51 .00 .00 000102 CENTRAL DATA SUPPLY COMPANY 1 599.60 599.60 .00 .00 000147 CON -WAY CENTRAL EXPRESS, INC. 1 28.90 28.90 .00 .00 000250 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 495.00 495.00 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 2,933.70 2,933.70 .00 .00 001278 DNR FORESTRY 1 884.79 884.79 .00 .00 0 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 1 633.42 633.42 .00 .00 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 5 6,636.22. 6,636.22 .00 _.0.0 003540 PLUNKETT'S, INC. 1 10.91 10.91 .00 .00 003926 SCHWAAB, INC. 1 61.34 61.34 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 190.10 190.10 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 10,737.62 10,737.62 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 23 39,017.85 39,017.85 .00 .00* • • EXPENDITURES FEBRUARY 14, 2000 2000 BUDGET • • Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:11 • Ranges: Options: Operator: JAL Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 679 - 679 (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount 0 BLAINE, CITY OF 0 CHICAGO TITLE O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, O MEDICA O MN. TEAMSTERS 0 NAHL, CATHERINE O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN 0 URICH, TRACEY WATER TESTING FEE ASSESSMENT OVERPAYMENT DENTAL INSURANCE REPAIR /REFINISH MEDICAL INSURANCE LLPD DENTAL REIMBURSE FORFEIT CASH ADVERTISING REIMBURSE COMPUTER OVERP Total for Dept ** O HENLEY HEALTHCARE, INC SUPPLIES Total for Dept 201 0 0 • MRPA UMPIRE REGISTRATION Total for Dept 202 0 AFTON ALPS LIFT TICKETS /BOARD RENTA O BURSACK, ELIZABETH REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SOFTBALLS 0 WILD MOUNTAIN, INC. LIFT TICKETS Total for Dept 205 0 BURGER, LUANN DANCE O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, MINI BASKETBALLS 0 USTA PARK AND RECREATION Total for Dept 207 O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI CONFERENCE O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JANUARY 24 Total for Dept 401 0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES * * * * * * ** 140.67 * * * * * * ** 101.88 * * * * * * ** 727.46 * * * * * * ** 500.00 * * * * * * ** 4,424.96 ** * * * * ** 80.80 * * * * * * ** 30.00 * * * * * * ** 19.25 * * * * * * ** 10.89 6,035.91* ADULT IN 117.20 117.20* ADULT SP 145.00 145.00* SPECIAL 466.00 SPECIAL 68.35 SPECIAL 21.25 SPECIAL 973.00 1,528.60* YOUTH IN 378.00 YOUTH IN 21.67 YOUTH IN 63.26 YOUTH IN 114.50 577.43* MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO ADMINIST ADMINIST 11.70 55.00 750.39 817.09* 29.15 316.50 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:11 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description Dept Amount DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVI LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI MEDICA METROPOLITAN AREA MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 OFFICEMAX, INC. SAVAGE, CITY OF SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS DENTAL INSURANCE PACKET DELIVERY REGISTRATION:MARY F, JEA REGISTRATION:LINDA W,TOM MEDICAL INSURANCE MEMBERSHIP /LINDA W S SOFTWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP COMPUTERS SUBSCRIPTION UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 402 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 403 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JANUARY 13 Total for Dept 405 O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 406 0 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL FILE CABINET O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI BACKUP TAPES II, 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 407 O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE O EVERGREEN PRESS PRINTS /20 O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI COMPUTERS Total for Dept 415 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAME PLATES 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 416 ADMINIST 77.01 ADMINIST 28.94 ADMINIST 435.00 ADMINIST 75.00 ADMINIST 1,283.96 ADMINIST 45.00 ADMINIST 15.00 ADMINIST 282.08 ADMINIST 20.00 ADMINIST 1,873.34 ADMINIST 22.75 ADMINIST 61.45 4,565.18* ELECTION 46.03 46.03* CHARTER 133.13 133.13* SENIORS 32.37 SENIORS 12.03 SENIORS 4.49 48.89* FINANCE 832.20 FINANCE 132.53 FINANCE 13.74 978.47* ECONOMIC 27.55 ECONOMIC 30.89 ECONOMIC 193.95 ECONOMIC 13.51 ECONOMIC 1,873.33 2,139.23* PLANNING 31.35 PLANNING 77.00 PLANNING 193.95 PLANNING 38.88 PLANNING 22.39 363.57* 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY ENGINEER 1.44 Total for Dept 417 1.44* 0 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE 0 AMEN TREASURER /ASSOC 0 MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P POLICE 0 BOWDICH, JACKIE M. REIMBURSE TUBS /EVIDENCE POLICE • 364.25 20.00 82.49 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:12 Operator: JAL Page: 3 • CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name • Description Dept Amount O BROWN, MELINDA O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 0 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI O CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE O CompUSA, INC. 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER /' 0 GALL'S INC. O GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVI 0 KAULFUSS, RENEE 0 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, 0 LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN O MEDICA O MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE O MN. TEAMSTERS O NIK PUBLIC SAFETY, INC 0 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE O PETTY CASH O SHRED -IT, INC. 0 TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 MEDICA O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, L O MEDICA O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR 0 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI O BOLDT, ROBERT O CONNEXUS ENERGY O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC O D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE O FRIDLEY, CITY OF O HAVEL, CHAD O KIEGER ENTERPRISES, IN MEALS OFFICE SUPPLIES ROLL OF STAMPS CAR WASHES KIT /CARD MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE DUES /DAVE P UNIFORM SUPPLIES REGISTRATION /DAVE P REIMBURSE KITCHEN SUPPLI REPAIR /REFINISH PRINTING SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE LICENSE TABS LLPD DENTAL REFILLS ANIMAL CONTROL MILEAGE /NOTARY FEE /SUPLI DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT KEY CHAINS /MUGS LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 DENTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 421 DENTAL INSURANCE SOFTWARE LICENSE /SUPORT MEDICAL INSURANCE ELECTRICAL INSPRECTIONS LONG TERM DISABILITY REGISTRATION /CARRI V Total for Dept 422 MONTHLY SERVICE REIMBURSE CLOTHING MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES REFLECTIVE CONES DENTAL INSURANCE SIGNS SUPPLIES RMAA DUES REIMBURSE JOHN DEERE POLICE 41.97 POLICE 25.56 POLICE 33.00 POLICE 119.28 POLICE 1,789.95 POLICE 10.65 POLICE 71.93 POLICE 115.55 POLICE 120.00 POLICE 595.98 POLICE 150.00 POLICE 84.23 POLICE 1,495.87 POLICE 470.36 POLICE 6,542.31 POLICE 28.00 POLICE 738.60 POLICE 454.50 POLICE 66.65 POLICE 249.23 POLICE 54.95 POLICE 2,200.61 POLICE 241.27 POLICE 116.84 16,284.03* FIRE 43.33 FIRE 1,090.03 FIRE 13.74 1,147.10* BUILDING 38.50 BUILDING 2,385.00 BUILDING 583.96 BUILDING 1,171.26 BUILDING 31.37 BUILDING 60.00 4,270.09* STREETS 34.90 ALLOW STREETS 58.00 STREETS 399.53 STREETS 34.27 STREETS 191.57 STREETS 77.01 STREETS 676.09 STREETS 8.47 STREETS 10.00 CLOTHING ALLOW STREETS 107.80 STREETS 1,750.00 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:13 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name • • Description Dept Amount O MEDICA O MID -CON SYSTEMS, INC. 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 0 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR O UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT 0 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS O WEATHER WATCH, INC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS BAUER BUILT, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CARLSON TRACTOR /EQUIP. CATCO PARTS, INC. CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL CRAIG'S MACHINE SHOP L DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I LEEF BROTHER, INC. MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH MEDICAL INSURANCE DECAL /VANDAL REMOVER MAT MONTHLY SERVICE LICENSE TABS MONTHLY SERVICE LONG TERM DISABILITY TUITION BATTERIES MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 430 PARTS /SUPPLIES SHIPPING SERVICE CALL PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS FITTING /GUARD /HOSE VEHICLE REPAIR PLOW PARTS GASOHOL PARTS SUPPLIES CHEMICALS SHOP TOWELS TORO PARTS PARTS /SUPPLIES UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 431 A T & T ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNIT ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN CONNEXUS ENERGY DALCO, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, HEATCO, INC. HUGO HEATING J. H. LARSON MEDICA MENARDS, INC. SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR US WEST COMMUNICATIONS W. W. GRAINGER, INC. IN MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE CHAIR CADDY RENTL /CARPET CUTTER MONTHLY SERVICE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE REPAIR HEATER AND RELOCATE THERMOSTAT PARTS /SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE SUPPLIES IN HALLWAY NAME PLATES SERVICE AGREEMENT FLUORESCENT LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE LOCKOUT KIT COOLI COMPANY, Total for Dept 432 STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 581.85 98.20 8.84 54.00 73.59 46.58 60.00 49.61 176.00 4,496.31* 342.53 199.21 585.00 621.24 376.33 172.78 500.50 847.99 5,529.30 155.14 9.78 149.31 12.15 524.58 190.10 9.59 10,225.53* 41.40 276.63 117.95 64.31 1,212.94 259.91 31.99 46.89 67.50 310.00 61.78 400.01 148.14 111.57 4,596.80 99.84 8.04 1,951.26 194.17 10,001.13* Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:13 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description Dept Amount A T & T WIRELESS SERVI ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVI LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. NATURE CALLS, INC. NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, MONTHLY SERVICE PARCEL SEARCH MEMBERSHIP /MIKE H OFFICE SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE SUPPLIES REGISTRATION:MARY F, JEA REGISTRATION:LINDA W, TOM MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE CONFERENCE /MIKE, STEVE,TR MONTHLY SERVICE TROUBLESHOOT SECURITY LI SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI COMPUTER UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT TUITION URICH, TRACEY REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS BATTERIES Total for Dept 450 O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY O BERNSTEIN, BARRY O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN O MEDICA O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O NATIONAL PEN CORPORATI O NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSO O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR Total SERVICE MILEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE PRINTING SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE PENS RENEWAL /BARRY B. LONG TERM DISABILITY for Dept 451 O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI O MEDICA O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O OFFICEMAX, INC. O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN O SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGICAL O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR MONTHLY SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES NAME PLATES MEMBERSHIP /MARTY A LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 461 O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 462 O INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY DUES / MARTY A O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF A MEMBERSHIP /MARTY A O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY PARKS 60.92 PARKS 28.00 PARKS 25.00 PARKS 42.56 PARKS 115.55 PARKS 75.00 PARKS 35.00 PARKS 40.00 PARKS 1,581.42 PARKS 13.26 PARKS 950.00 PARKS 174.60 PARKS 244.72 PARKS 1,059.68 PARKS 58.69 PARKS 240.00 PARKS 57.19 PARKS 113.37 PARKS 49.60 4,964.56* RECREATI 24.89 RECREATI 65.98 RECREATI 119.20 RECREATI 19.25 RECREATI 220.51 RECREATI 193.95 RECREATI 4.42 RECREATI 100.45 RECREATI 20.00 RECREATI 21.74 790.39* ENVIRONM 24.89 ENVIRONM 175.00 ENVIRONM 4.42 ENVIRONM 24.48 ENVIRONM 19.44 ENVIRONM 99.00 ENVIRONM 6.47 353.70* SOLID WA 150.00 SOLID WA 27.44 177.44* FORESTRY 85.00 FORESTRY 175.01 FORESTRY 20.00 FORESTRY 6.48 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:56:14 Operator: JAL • Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 NORWEST BANK O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI O BLAINE, CITY OF O CONNEXUS ENERGY O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE O GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA 0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN O HUGO HEATING AND COOLI O MEDICA O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O SY /COM, INC. O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR O US WEST COMMUNICATIONS O VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS O WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. Total for Dept 463 AGENT FEE Total for Dept 470 MONTHLY SERVICE UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE SUPPLIES TOOLS CONTAINER DEMURRAGE CLEAN /REPAIR CLEARWATER MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE SCADA COMPUTER SOLDER SWIVEL LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE BATTERIES SUPPLIES Total for Dept 494 O BLAINE, CITY OF UTILITY BILLING O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE .0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE O NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP HYDROMATIC WEAR RING O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY O VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS BATTERIES Total for Dept 495 • 286.49* DEBT SER 1,500.00 1,500.00* WATER 90.67 WATER 443.75 WATER 750.92 WATER 17.32 WATER 42.40 WATER 407.32 WATER 84.63 WATER 125.00 WATER 96.98 WATER 4.42 WATER 2,647.22 WATER 29.65 WATER 15.95 WATER 96.75 WATER 24.81 WATER 116.51 4,994.30* SEWER 1,385.70 SEWER 200.15 SEWER 17.34 SEWER 96.97 SEWER 4.42 SEWER 165.06 SEWER 677.34 SEWER 15.29 SEWER 24.80 2,587.07* O S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTS CONTRACTOR /LAKE DRIVE TR OTHER O SPRINGSTED, INC. REPORTING SERVICE OTHER Total for Dept 499 69,099.69 1,400.00 70,499.69* Grand Total 150,075.00* Date: 02/08/2000 Time 13:38:46 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Options: Vendor # Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 671 - 671 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Detail / Summary: S Name Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N # of items Discount Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 000082 J. H. LARSON COMPANY, INC. 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 000103 AFTON ALPS 000110 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 000134 BOLDT, ROBERT 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 000177 HENLEY HEALTHCARE, INC. 000178 HEATCO, INC. 469 20 -0,0 AMEM TREASkYRER/ASSOC OF- tflJ .EMG 1 MGRS 0 HAVEL, CHAD 000181 MID -CON SYSTEMS, INC. 000182 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIO 000183 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 000184 NIK PUBLIC SAFETY, INC. 000185 NAHL, CATHERINE 000186 USTA 000187 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 000188 SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION 000207 AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY • 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 41.40 41.40 .00 .00 61.78 61.78 .00 .00 276.63 276.63 .00 .00 466.00 466.00 .00 .00 325.34 325.34 .00 .00 58.00 58.00 .00 .00 64.31 64.31 .00 .00 407.32 407.32 .00 .00 117.20 117.20 .00 .00 67.50 67.50 .00 .00 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 107.80 107.80 .00 .00 98.20 98.20 .00 .00 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 100.45 100.45 .00 .00 454.50 454.50 .00 .00 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 114.50 114.50 .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 99.00 99.00 .00 .00 199.21 199.21 .00 .00 342.53 342.53 .00 .00 Date: 02/08/2000 Time: 13:38:47 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 2 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Discount •r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 2 585.00 585.00 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 65.98 65.98 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 2 1,970.12 1,970.12 .00 .00 000743 BOWDICH, JACKIE M. 1 82.49 82.49 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 621.24 621.24 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 68.35 68.35 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 385.11 385.11 .00 .00 000990 CARLSON TRACTOR /EQUIP. CO, INC. 2 376.33 376.33 .00 .00 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 172.78 172.78 .00 .00 001053 CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL ALIGN, INC. 2 500.50 500.50 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 001114 CHICAGO TITLE 1 101.88 101.88 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 119.28 119.28 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,574.19 2,574.19 .00 .00 "OO1 -2-22 CRAIG'S MACHINE SHOP LTIl.- 1 847.99 847.99 .00 .00 41, D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 1 191.57 191.57 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 259.91 259.91 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 3 5,529.30 5,529.30 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 1,337.35 1,337.35 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 676.09 676.0P .00 .00 001437 EVERGREEN PRESS 1 30.89 30.89 .00 .00 001450 EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC. 2 28.94 28.94 .00 .00 001455 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER /FBINAA 1 120.00 120.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 2 84.63 84.63 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 155.14 155.14 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 167.64 167.64 .00 .00 • Date: 02/08/2000 Time 13:38:49 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Illpir # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001570 FRIDLEY, CITY OF 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 595.98 595.98 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 149.31 149.31 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 46.89 46.89 .00 .00 001700 GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE 2 620.00 620.00 .00 .00 001720 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 2 194.17 194.17 .00 .00 001881 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 2 435.00 435.00 .00 .0C 002002 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF 1 85.00 85.00 .00 .00 002113 KAULFUSS, RENEE 1 84.23 84.23 .00 .00 002142 KIEGER ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 1,750.00 1,750.00 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 21.67 21.67 .00 .00 002180 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 1 832.20 832.20 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 2 1,995.87 1,995.87 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2 170.00 170.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 12.15 12.15 .00 .00 002340 LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 1 690.87 690.87 .00 .00 40 MEDICA 1 17,614.31 17,614.31 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 148.14 148.14 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 2 84.51 84.51 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 39.78 . 39.78 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 3 82.00 82.00 .00 .00 002963 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ABORICULTURE 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 002980 MN. TEAMSTERS 1 819.40 819.40 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 2 145.00 145.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 2 1,474.58 1,474.58 .00 .00 003120 NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSOCIATION 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 • Date: 02/08/2000 Time 13:38:50 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount 41117 # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 174.60 174.60 .00 .00 003193 NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 244.72 244.72 .00 .00 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1 238.65 238.65 .00 .00 003280 NORTHERN WATER WKS SUP, INC. 1 677.34 677.34 .00 .00 003340 NORWEST BANK 4 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 320.07 320.07 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER 1 66.65 66.65 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 249.23 249.23 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 65.28 65.28 .00 .00 003871 S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 69,099.69 69,099.69 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 150.00 150.00 .00 .0C 003917 SAVAGE, CITY OF 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 004010 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 2 169.89 169.89 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 4 9,535.68 9,535.68 .00 .00 004100 SPRINGSTEP, INC. 1 1,400.00 1,400.00 .00 .00 11/0 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 1 22.75 22.75 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,171.26 1,171.26 .00 .00 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 1 99.84 99.84 .00 .00 004320 SY /COM, INC. 1 2,647.22 2,647.22 .00 .00 004370 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD. 1 2,385.00 2,385.00 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 190.10 190.10 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 5 883.52 883.52 .00 .00 004479 TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC. 2 2,200.61 2,200.61 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 1 29.65 29.65 .00 .00 004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 606.16 606.16 .00 .00 004612 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 • Date: 02/08/2000 Time 13:38:52 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal V # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Net Gross Discount Lost.- 004660 URICH, TRACEY 2 68.08 68.08 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 2 2,278.22 2,278.22 .00 .00 004671 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 1 364.25 364.25 .00 .00 004730 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 1 148.82 148.82 .00 .00 004791 WEATHER WATCH, INC. 1 176.00 176.00 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 116.51 116.51 .00 .00 900340 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITURE, INC. 1 117.95 117.95 .00 .00 900343 CompUSA, INC. 1 1,789.95 1,789.95 .00 .00 900488 WILD MOUNTAIN, INC. 1 973.00 973.00 .00 .00 900497 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 378.00 378.00 .00 .00 900539 BROWN, MELINDA 1 41.97 41.97 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 6 267.96 267.96 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 158 150,075.00 150,075.00 .00 .00' • • • • • MONTH END DISBURSEMENTS January-2000 GAMBLING LINO LAKES WRESTLING /DEPOSIT ERROR $ 868.00 PROGRAM REC DIAMOND T RANCH /DEPOSIT $ 63.90 REVENUE BONDS U S BANK $ 61,781.99 POLICE COMPUSA $ 4,333.56 UTILITIES CIRCLE PINES POSTMASTER $ 323.30 DEDICATED PARKS REGISTERED ABSTRACTORS $ 75,497.62 TOTAL MANUAL DISBURSEMENT $142,868.37 Page 1 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax February 2, 2000 TO: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council • City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of February expenses. Your approval of February expenses as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12040 — 12058, in the amount of $8,389.14 is hereby requested. • • DATE CHECK# NAME 02/02/2000 12040 02/02/2000 12041 02/02/2000 12042 02/02/2000 12043 02/02/2000 12044 02/02/2000 12045 02/02/2000 12046 02/02/2000 12047 02/02/2000 12048 02/02/2000 12049 02/02/2000 12050 02/02/2000 12051 02/02/2000 12052 02/02/2000 12053 02/02/2000 12054 02/02/2000 12055 02/02/2000 12056 02/02/2000 12057 02/02/2000 12058 • • Centennial Fire District Check Register Airtouch Cellular Amoco Oil Company Arrowhead EMS Association Chief Supply Circle Pines Office Products Circle Pines Utilities Connexus Energy Dan Lallier Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Emergency Medical Supplies Janet Haapoja Kevin Stewart Lino Cabinets, Inc. Northern States Power Randy T. Rolstad Tom Thumb U.S. West Viking Office Products Zep Manufacturing ACCOUNT 42240 - Telephone 42100 -Fuel and Lube 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42130 - Equipment Expense 42180 -Office Supplies 42251- Station 1 - Gas 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42260 - Medical Supplies 41023 - Steering Committee 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42130- Equipment Expense 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 40100 - Logistical Expense 42100 -Fuel and Lube 42240 - Telephone 42180 -Office Supplies 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance Total Page 1 of 1 AMOUNT 217.78 260.50 620.00 109.48 479.47 367.87 496.47 321.74 535.84 588.68 50.00 108.50 2,695.00 476.13 127.93 77.07 357.66 167.50 331.52 8,389.14 • • • CONSENT AGENDA 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk DATE: February 9, 2000 TOPIC: Appoint Election Judges for Special Election VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/4 Vote) BACKGROUND: In accordance with Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 the City of Lino Lakes is required to appoint election judges for the March 14, 2000 Special Election no later than February 18, 2000. Therefore, approval is requested at the February 14, 2000 City Council meeting. Attached please find the precinct judge list, which incorporates all current judges. However, since we anticipate a low voter turn out only a minimal number of judges will be used during the Special Election. Currently, the City Clerks office anticipates no more than five judges at each of the four precincts. Since the City has not received confirmation from the judges scheduled to work, other judges on the list may need to be requested to work. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Precinct Judge List 2. Deny Precinct Judge List RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to approve the submitted judge list • MARCH 14, 2000 SPECIAL ELECITON PRECINCT JUDGES • • *Indicates Head Judge PRECINCT NO. 1, Lino Lakes Senior Center, 1189 Main Street 1318 Registered Voters, all in School District No. 831 NAME * Sylvia Marier + Jo Anne Bucholz ** Joyce Dupre Joyce Gruber Mary Schleicher ADDRESS PHONE 1805 - 77th Street (55038) 429 -4616 8215 Wood Duck Trail 786 -8160 7244 Main Street (Centerville, 429 -1439 1587 Peltier Lake Dr. (Centerville, 426 -7610 55038) 610 Main Street Anne Nelson 87 Lilac Street * LaVerne Peterson 7230 LaValle Drive (Centerville, 55038) Anna May Thies 7590 - 20th Avenue (55038) + Mary Trombley 880 James Street 786 -2086 786 -3952 429 -0482 429 -2040 780 -4547 PRECINCT NO. 2, St. Joseph Catholic Church Social Hall, 161 Elm St. (784 -5723) 2778 Registered Voters in School District No. 12 124 Registered Voters in School District No. 831 * Eileen Couture Al DeMotts Mary Fogarty ** *Mary Jane Lang Patty Meier ## Shirley Sager 6973 Lakeview Avenue 786 -2587 7140 Rice Lake Lane 780 -5551 7088 Brian Drive (Centerville, 426 -9694 55038) 1559 Peltier Lake Dr. (Centerville, 426 -5614 7073 Rice Lake Lane 786 -7098 7000 Eagle Trail (Centerville, 762 -1020 55038) # ## Rosemary Storberg 6978 Lake Drive Ruth Howard Thia A. Casanova Vivan Hanson * June Miller Cheryl Noren Marie Waldhauser Betty Livingston 6333 Hodgson Road 6514 Joyer Lane (55038) 6152 Hodgson Road 1220 — 81S` Street, Forest Lake 7155 Ivy Ridge Court 221 Baldwin Circle 7156 Sunset Avenue PAGE 1 780 -2483 484 -8360 429 -4494 484 -7341 464 -3711 785 -4138 483 -2555 7841866 • 1999 MUNICIPAL ELECTION PRECINCT NO. 3, Rice Lake Elementary School Gym, 575 Birch Street 1752 Registered Voters all in School District No. 12 * Jean Viger ** *Mary Alstatt ** Joyce Lund 1715 NE 133rd Lane, Blaine 6134 Ware Road 480 Arrowhead Drive Jackie Murawski 6843 West Shadow Lake Drive Bernice Salo 7482 Peltier Drive (55038) William P. Trudeau 410 - 62nd Street * Sally Nelson ** James Bernier Karen A. Carlin Cori M. Duffy Jim Gooden ** *Theresa Nelson * ** 87 Lilac Street 2325 Main Street (55038) 6550 Black Duck Drive 6256 Hollow Lane 1477 Snow Goose Trail (55038) 308 Linda Lane 612- 757 -0694 482 -1783 482 -9382 484 -5653 426 -3342 486 -7980 786 -3952 429 -7211 426 -7862 765 -9739 653 -5951 481 -1594 PRECINCT NO. 4, Living Waters Lutheran Church, 865 Birch Street 1609 Registered Voters in School District No. 12 529 Registered Voters in School District No. 624 120 Registered Voters in School District No. 831 Diane Bergeson Lisa MacNeal Rosemary Barett Beverly Ornell Rob Rafferty # Jane Schmid ** *Mary Ann Thill Gail Wells 6996 W. Shadow Lk. Drive 484 -6898 1141 Birch Street 653 -8863 6953 Centerville Road (Centerville, 429 -7539 55038) 1057 Mallard Lane 426 -9640 1573 Merganser Court, (55038) 426 -6880 6026 W. Bald Eagle Drive (55110) 426 -9299 1385 Mound Trail (Centerville, 426 -0051) 55038) 6701 East Shadow Lake Drive 429 -3062 * Ardith Bernier 2325 Main Street (55038) ** *Judy Almendinger 1305 Mound Trail (Centerville, 55038) ** *Judy Domning 7569 Leonard Avenue ** *Marilyn Erkenbrack 7377 Peltier Circle (Centerville, 55038) Gloria Gooden 1477 Snow Goose Trail (55038) Marion Gustafson 1509 Ash Street (55038) PAGE 2 429 -7211 426 -1460 783 -3911 429 -9340 653 -5951 429 -4971 Agenda Item 3A (Revised) Staff Originator: Dan Tesch Date: February 11, 2000 Topic: Consider Requests for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds and Adopting Resolution 2000 -18 Designating Community Development Block Grant for the City of Lino Lakes for Funding year 2000 -2001 Vote Required: 3/4 Background: The City's CDBG allocation for the 2000 -2001 grant year is $34,492. One thousand dollars is earmarked for administrative costs. The balance of the funds can be used to benefit low to moderate income residents or to clean up blight in the community. On January 10, agencies presented their requests to the city council during a public hearing. Council action was scheduled for the February 14 council meeting in order to meet Anoka County's deadline of February 15. Staff has prepared the attached recommendations and Resolution 2000 -18 with the understanding that council may amend it, based on review of the materials submitted by the requesting agencies. The primary criteria staff considered included the number of Lino Lakes residents serviced and whether or not similar services are available from other providers. The county has informed the city that 15% of the overall county grant may be allocated towards public services and 20% of the overall county grant may be allocated towards planning projects. It is possible that the county may come back after the grant requests have been submitted with possible cuts if the overall percentages are exceeded. Options: 1. Approve the revised staff recommendations and adopt Resolution 2000- 18 as presented. 2. Amend the revised staff recommendation and approve the amended recommendation. 3. Decline to allocate the available CDBG funds. Recommendation: Approve CDBG funding per the revised staff recommendations and adopt Resolution 2000 -18 as presented. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved it's adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 2000 -18 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR FUNDING YEAR 2000 -2001. WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is anticipating receiving Community Development Block Grant Funds for funding year 2000 -2001 in the amount of $33,492.00 ($34,492.00 less $1,000.00 for County administration costs), and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the funding of a Senior Outreach program for our community through the Anoka County Community Action Program, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports Alexandra House and its cause of assisting families with intervention, prevention and community advocacy services, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the ARC of Anoka and Ramsey Counties program, designed to provide advocacy and support to people with developmental disabilities and their families, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Community Emergency Assistance Program and its mission of helping people become self- sufficient and maintain their dignity, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau and its goal of providing service to the communities youth, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the North Anoka Meals on Wheels program, designed to provide food to homebound seniors and handicapped individuals, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Rise program, with assistance towards purchasing vehicles for their transportation services, and WHEREAS, The City Council supports the preparation of a Septic System Ordinance that will promote health and safety through regulation of individual sewage treatment systems. • • • Page 2 Resolution 2000 -18 WHEREAS, The City Council supports the preparation of an environmental study which will address a Native Landscape Management Program. This plan will incorporate specific action steps for existing and future restoration areas. This plan will become a part of the Environmental Management Plan and ultimately included as part to the city Comprehensive Plan WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Preservation Development Program to preserve open space and make for more environmentally benign development. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,700 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. funds be designated for the Anoka County Community Action Program. 2. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. funds be designated for Intervention, Prevention and Community Advocacy Services provided by the Alexandra House. 3. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $300.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. for the ARC of Anoka and Ramsey Counties 4. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Community Emergency Assistance Program. 5. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,500.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau program. 6. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,992.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the North Anoka Meals on Wheels program. 7. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $1,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Rise program. 8. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. funds be used to assist in paying for the formation of a Septic System Ordinance. 9. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. funds be used to pay for an environmental study that will address a Native Landscape Management Program. t Page 3 0 Resolution 2000 -18 • • 10. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $6,000.00 of its 2000 -2001 C.D.B.G. funds be used to assist in paying for the formation of a Preservation Development Plan. 11. That the aforementioned dollar allocations shall be expended to the fullest extent possible given possible public service and planning limitations at Anoka County. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th Day of February 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • CITY OF LINO LAKES 2000 -2001 CDBG FUNDING Agency Funding 1999 -2000 Request for 2000 -2001 Staff Recommends Council Approves Alexandra House $4,000 $4,500 $4,000 $4,000 Anoka County CAP $1,000 $6,132 $5,000 $4,700 ARC of Anoka, Ramsey Cos. No request $1,000 - $300 CEAP $1,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 Forest Lake Area Youth Bureau $4,500 $5,000 $4,500 $4,500 No. Anoka Meals on Wheels $2,263 $4,094 $2,992 $2,992 Resource Center for Fathers 0 $1,000 - - Rise 0 $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 City Program: 1 Septic System Ordinance $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 City Program: 2 Native Planting No Request $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 City Program: 3 Preservation Development $4,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 Total $33,492 $33,492 1. City is currently using Anoka County's ordinance. Staff will be asking council to reconsider adopting a city ordinance. Also, implementation of either ordinance will require a significant investment of staff time to follow up with 180 property owners who have not responded to notices to have their systems pumped. 2. City has encouraged native plantings. Now there is a need to develop effective guidelines for maintaining native plantings and a plan to coordinate public and private efforts to establish native plantings. 3. Research on how to accomplish preservation development is ongoing. Additional funds will support development of a project review process and incorporation of that process into existing city ordinances. • • • AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE February 14, 2000 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND Consideration of Resolution No 2000 - 12 Accepting Donation from the Centennial Fire District to defer costs to administer the D.A.R.E. program. Simple Majority The Centennial Fire District has graciously donated $2,000.00 to offset the cost of the D.A.R.E. program. The goal of the Lino Lakes Police Department is to ensure that the D.A.R.E. Program continues to be partially funded through donations from the community. Centennial Fire District is aware of this goal and has donated $2,000.00 toward the cost of administering the program in the local middle school, and the elementary schools in 2000. The purpose of Resolution 2000- 12 is to accept and publicly thank the Centennial Fire District for their generous donation. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 - 12 accepting the donation. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • • Council Member and moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 12 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Police Department began teaching the D.A.R.E. program in local elementary schools in January of 1995, and the middle school in 1998; and WHEREAS, the curriculum, developed by educators, is a drug prevention curriculum taught by specially selected and trained uniformed police officers; and WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire District was made aware of the desire for the Lino Lakes Police Department to teach this program in the middle school and elementary schools and has donated $2,000.00 to the City to defer the cost of this program, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $2,000.00 toward the cost of the D.A.R.E. program and wishes to express its gratitude to the Centennial Fire District for its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of February, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Rychel- Gaustad /CMC, Clerk - Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director February 7, 2000 Consideration of Approving Antenna Lease Agreement — AirTouch Cellular Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: AirTouch Cellular has discussed with staff the installation of antenna facilities on the city's existing water storage tank near the correctional facility. The attached proposed agreement between AirTouch Cellular and the city has been reviewed and approved by the city attorney, staff, and AirTouch Cellular officials. Staff is requesting council approval of the antenna lease agreement. AirTouch Cellular is proposing to lease space for the installation of up to three sectors of four panel antennas from the city's water tower at $13,891.50 per year. The amount will increase annually by the greater of five percent or the consumer price index. The rental rate coincides with the existing tenants on the water towers. The agreement is for five years with the opportunity for three additional five -year renewal periods. Ole associated cabinets will be installed inside the tower base on a platform approximately 10' x 12'. The lease agreement prioritizes users on the storage tank such that the city and public safety agencies are a higher priority. This allows higher priority users to use the water tower in the future if interference occurs. Since the water tower is adjacent to the correctional facility, the lease agreement requires that AirTouch personnel contact prison officials prior to obtaining access to the site. The necessary language to indemnify and hold harmless the city on all claims due to AirTouch Cellular operation, installation, or maintenance of their facilities has been included and reviewed by the city attorney. Pitt -Des Moines, the water tower manufacturer has reviewed the plans and specifications and has indicated that the installation of the proposed antennas will not affect the tower's structural integrity and warranty. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt a motion approving the antenna lease agreement with AirTouch Cellular and to authorize and direct the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement subject to proper insurance documentation and submittal of an intermodulation interference evaluation indicating no interference with existing users. RECOMMENDATION: Option 2. • sw /rick/Green Sheet Air Touch Cellular Antenna Lease Agreement.doc • • SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ORIGINAL THIS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Lease "), made this day of 2000, between the City of Lino Lakes, ( "Landlord "), and AirTouch Communications, Inc., d /b /a AirTouch Cellular, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware ( "Tenant ") . For good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. Leased Premises. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant leases from Landlord a portion of Landlord's property, located at 7470 4th Avenue, Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ( "The Property"), subject to any and all existing easements, and a portion of the Lino Lakes Water Tower or other structure ( "Structure "), as more particularly shown in Exhibit B attached hereto, on which directional antennas, connecting cables, and appurtenances will be attached and located, the exact location of each to be reasonably approved by Landlord's Director of Public Works, together with appurtenant easements and access rights ( "Leased Premises "). 2. Rent. (a) Amount, Adjustments. As consideration for this Lease, Tenant shall pay Landlord an annual rent in the amount of $13,891.50 for the initial year, which shall be increased each year on January 1, by the greater of: (a) five percent (5 %) of the previous year's annualized rental, or (b) by an amount equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index ( "CPI "). The CPI shall mean the "Consumer Price Index - for All Urban Consumers, All Cities, All Items (1984 = 100)" as published by the United States Department of Labor Statistics, or if such index shall be discontinued, the successor index, or if there shall be no successor index, such comparable index as mutually agreed upon by the parties. To determine the annual rental increase to be paid by Tenant under a CPI adjuster, the annualized rental for the previous year shall be multiplied by a percentage figure, computed from a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the CPI for the third quarter of the preceding year and the denominator of which shall be the CPI for the corresponding quarter of one year earlier. Such fraction shall be converted to a percentage equivalent. The resulting percentage fixture shall be multiplied by the previous year's rent (annualized for the first year, see Section 4 below). (b) Time of Payment, Taxes. Landlord shall communicate all rental increases to the Tenant in writing by the preceding December 1 of each year. The annual rental shall be paid before January 1 of each year. For the first year, the rental shall be pro- rated through December 31 and shall be paid to Landlord in full at the time Lease is executed. If the Tenant does not meet the requirements, referenced in Subparagraph • 3(a) below by June 1, 2000, and Tenant has diligently pursued such requirements, Landlord shall refund the Tenant rental payment made at the time of Lease execution 1 • and this Lease shall terminate. In addition to the annual rental, Tenant agrees to timely pay its pro rata share of any taxes or payment in lieu of taxes required as a result of this Lease. 3. Governmental Approval Contingency. (a) Tenant Application. Tenant's right to use the Leased Premises is expressly made contingent upon its obtaining all the certificates, permits, zoning and other approvals that may be required by any federal, state, or local authority. This shall include the engineering study specified in Subparagraph 3(b) below on the Structure to be conducted at Tenant's expense. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and retain such approvals and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Leased Premises with respect to the Tenant's proposed use thereof. (b) Interference Study. Before obtaining a building permit, Tenant must pay for the reasonable cost of (i) a radio frequency interference study including an intermodulation (IM) interference evaluation and a side band noise interference evaluation carried out by an independent and qualified professional engineer selected by the Landlord showing that Tenant's intended use will not interfere with any existing communications facilities and (ii) an engineering study showing that the Structure is able to support the Tenant's Facilities, as defined in Subparagraph 5(b), without prejudice to the City's use of the Structure. If the study finds that there is a potential for interference that cannot be reasonably remedied or for prejudice to the Structure, Landlord may terminate this Lease immediately and refund the initial rental to Tenant. (c) Non - approval. In the event that any application necessary under Subparagraph 3(a) above is finally rejected or any certificate, permit, license, or approval issued to Tenant is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority so that Tenant, in its sole discretion, will be unable to use the Leased Premises for its intended purposes, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease and be reimbursed for the rental payment if made pursuant to Subparagraph 2(b) above. Notice of Tenant's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to Landlord in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be effective upon receipt of such notice by Landlord as evidenced by the return receipt. Except as required under Subparagraph 13(d) below, upon such termination, this Lease shall become null and void and the parties shall have no further obligations to each other. 4. Term and Renewals. The "Initial Term" of this lease shall commence on the date in the first paragraph of this Lease ( "Effective Date ") and end on December 31 of the fifth calendar year of the Lease. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for three (3) additional five (5) year renewal periods ( "Renewal Term ") commencing on January 1 following the expiration date of the Initial Term or of any subsequent Renewal Term. This lease shall be automatically renewed for each successive Renewal Term unless Tenant sends written notice on non - renewal to Landlord no later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term, such notice to be provided in accordance with Paragraph 20 of this Lease. 5. Tenant's Use. (a) User Priority. Tenant agrees that the following priorities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the event of communication interference or other conflict while this Lease is in effect, and Tenant's use shall be subordinate accordingly: 1. Landlord; 2. Public safety agencies which are used by the Landlord for the general welfare of its residents, including, but not limited to, law enforcement, fire, and ambulance services, and public works; 3. Government - regulated entities and other governmental agencies not related to public safety whose antennae offer a service to the general public for a fee, in a manner similar to a public utility, such as long distance and cellular telephone, not including radio or television broadcasters. Within this category the Tenant with the earlier effective date of a continuous Site Lease Agreement shall have priority. (b) Purposes. Tenant shall use the Leased Premises only for the purpose of installing, maintaining, and operating a Landlord- approved communications antenna facility, equipment, cabinets and an accessory building, and uses incidental thereto for providing radio and wireless telecommunication services which Tenant is legally authorized to provide to the public. Tenant shall submit all plans and specifications for its Antenna Facilities to the Landlord for approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. This use shall be non - exclusive, and Landlord specifically reserves the right to allow the Leased Premises to be used by other parties and to make additions, deletions, or modifications to its own facilities on the Leased Premises. Tenant's communications antenna facility shall consist of antennas at a Landlord- approved location, along with cables and appurtenances connected to an accessory building or cabinet located on the Leased Premises ( "Antenna Facilities "). Tenant shall comply with all applicable ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal government agencies. Tenant shall not sublease site facility without proper approval of Landlord. (c) Construction. Tenant may erect and operate an antenna array in accordance with its submitted application attached as Exhibit B. If Tenant seeks to increase the number of antennas, it must first pay for an evaluation carried out by a qualified professional engineer, retained by Landlord demonstrating that (i) each additional antenna will not interfere with existing antennas or with proposed antennas with a higher priority and that (ii) any Structure can structurally support the additional antennas. The cost of each evaluation must be paid by the Tenant within 30 days after receiving written notice of the cost. Landlord must consent to installation of additional antennas; such consent will not be unreasonably withheld. If Landlord consents, the 3 parties will negotiate the amount of additional rental for the antennas based on the rent currently being paid for each existing antenna at similar capacity. (d) Operation. Tenant shall have the right, at its sole cost and expense, to operate and maintain the Antenna Facilities on the Leased Premises in accordance with good engineering practices, with all applicable FCC rules and regulations. Tenant's installation of all Antenna Facilities shall be done according to plans approved by Landlord, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any damage done to the Leased Premises or other Landlord property including the Structure during installation or during operations, shall be repaired at Tenant's expense within 30 days after notification of damage. The Antenna Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of the Tenant. (e) Maintenance, Improvement Expenses. All modifications to the Leased Premises and all improvements made for Tenant's benefit shall be at the Tenant's expense and such improvements, including antenna, facilities and equipment, shall be maintained in a good state of repair, at least equal to the standard of maintenance of the Landlord's facilities on or adjacent to the Leased Premises, and secured by Tenant. If Tenant's Antenna Facilities are mounted on the Structure they shall, at all times, be painted, at Tenant's expense, the same color as the Structure. (f) Replacements. Before the Tenant may update or replace the Antenna Facilities not shown on Exhibit B, Tenant must notify and provide a detailed proposal to Landlord. Tenant shall submit to Landlord a detailed proposal for any such replacement facilities and any other information reasonably requested by Landlord of such requested update or replacement, including but not limited to a technical study, carried out at Tenant's expense. Landlord may not unreasonably withhold approval. (g) Drawings. Tenant shall provide Landlord with as -built drawings for the equipment and improvements installed on the Leased Premises, which show the actual location of all Antenna Facilities. Said drawings shall be accompanied by a complete and detailed inventory of all equipment, personal property, and Antenna Facilities actually placed on the Leased Premises. (h) No Interference. Tenant shall, at its own expense, maintain any equipment on or attached to the Leased Premises in a safe condition, in good repair and in a manner suitable to Landlord so as not to conflict with the use of the surrounding premises by Landlord. Tenant shall not unreasonably interfere with the operations of any prior tenant using the Structure and shall not interfere with the working use of the water storage facilities thereon or to be placed thereon by Landlord. (i) Access. Tenant, at all times during this Lease, shall have access to the Leased Premises in order to install, operate, and maintain its Antenna Facilities. Tenant shall have access to the Structure only with the approval of Landlord. Tenant 110 acknowledges that site is located adjacent to the Lino Lakes Correctional Facility and tenant shall notify Correctional Facility officials prior to access to site. Tenant shall • request access to the Structure twenty -four (24) hours in advance, except in an emergency, and Landlord's approval thereof shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In the event it is necessary for Tenant to have access to the Structure at some time other than the normal working hours of Landlord, Landlord may charge Tenant for whatever expense, including employees' wages, that Landlord may incur in providing such access to Tenant. (j) Payment of Utilities. Tenant shall separately meter charges for the consumption of electricity and other utilities associated with its use of the Leased Premises and shall promptly pay all costs associated therewith. Those costs will include installation of separate meter and hook -up charges. 6. Emergency Facilities. In the event of a natural or man made disaster, in order to protect the health, welfare, and safety of the community, Tenant may erect additional Antenna Facilities and install additional equipment on a temporary basis on the Leased Premises to assure continuation of service. Such temporary operation shall not exceed 90 days unless Tenant obtains written approval from the Landlord. 7. Additional Maintenance Expenses. Upon notice from Landlord, Tenant shall promptly pay to Landlord all additional Landlord expenses incurred in maintaining the Leased Premises, including painting or other maintenance of the Structure, that are caused by Tenant's occupancy of the Leased Premises. • 8. Additional Buildings. Tenant acknowledges that Landlord may permit additional buildings to be constructed on the property described in Exhibit A. At such time as this may occur, Tenant will permit said buildings to be placed immediately adjacent to Tenant's building and will allow "attachments" to its building so as to give the appearance that all buildings are a connected facility. Said attachments will be made at no cost to Tenant, will not interfere with or disrupt Tenant's use of the Leased Premises and will not compromise the structural integrity of Tenant's building. • 9. Defense and Indemnification. (a) General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord or for which Landlord may be liable in the performance of this Lease which arise from the use occupancy of the Leased Premises by Tenant, except those which arise solely from the negligence, willful misconduct, or other fault of Landlord. Tenant shall defend all claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of Tenant's Antenna Facilities, equipment and related facilities on the Leased Premises. (b) Hazardous Materials. Without limiting the scope of Subparagraph 10 (a) above, Tenant will be solely responsible for and will defend, indemnify, and hold Landlord, its agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, and liabilities, including attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration of the Leased Premises associated with the Tenant's use of Hazardous Materials. For purposes of this Lease, "Hazardous Materials" shall be interpreted broadly and specifically includes, without limitation, asbestos, fuel, batteries or any hazardous substance, waste, or materials as defined in any federal, state, or local environmental or safety law or regulations including, but not limited to, CERCLA. (c) Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents and warrants that its use of the Leased Premises will not generate and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Leased Premises, nor transport to or over the Leased Premises, any Hazardous Materials, unless Tenant specifically informs Landlord thereof in writing twenty four hours prior to such storage, disposal or transport, or otherwise as soon as Tenant becomes aware of the existence of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises. The obligations of this Paragraph 9 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. (d) Landlord's Warranty. Landlord represents, warrants and agrees (1) that neither Landlord nor, to Landlord's knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Materials on, under about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation, and (2) that Landlord will not and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Land in violation of any law or regulation. Landlord agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Tenant and its partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any and all losses, liabilities, claims and /or costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 10. Insurance. (a) Workers' Compensation. The Tenant must maintain Workers' Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes. The policy shall also provide Employer's Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 Bodily Injury each accident, $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, policy limit, and $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, each employee. (b) General Liability. The Tenant must maintain an occurrence form comprehensive general liability coverage. Such coverage shall include, but not be limited to, bodily injury, property damage -- broad form, and personal injury, for the hazards of Premises /Operation, broad form, contractual, independent contractors, and products /completed operations. The Tenant must maintain aforementioned comprehensive general liability coverage with limits of liability not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence; $1,000,000 personal and advertising injury; $2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 6 • products and completed operations aggregate. These limits may be satisfied by the comprehensive general liability coverage or in combination with an umbrella or excess liability policy, provided coverage afforded by the umbrella or excess policy are no less than the underlying comprehensive general liability coverage. • • Tenant will maintain Completed Operations coverage for a minimum of two years after the construction is completed. (c) Automobile Liability. The Tenant must carry Automobile Liability coverage. Coverage shall afford total liability limits for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident. The liability limits may be afforded under the Commercial Policy, or in combination with an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy provided coverage of ridges afforded by the Umbrella Excess Policy are no less than the underlying Commercial Auto Liability coverage. Coverage shall be provided for Bodily Injury and Property Damage for the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of all owned, non -owned and hired automobiles. The Commercial Automobile Policy shall include at least statutory personal injury protection, uninsured motorists and underinsured motorists coverage. (d) Tenant Property Insurance. The Tenant must keep in force for the duration of the Lease a policy covering damages to its property at the Leased Premises. The amount of coverage shall be sufficient to replace the damaged property, loss of use and comply with any ordinance or law requirements. (e) Adiustment to Insurance Coverage Limits. The coverage limits set forth herein shall be increased at the time of any Renewal Term by 25 %. (f) Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance. The Tenant shall provide, prior to tenancy, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance issued by a company (rated A+ or better), licensed to do business in the state of Minnesota, which includes all coverages required in this Paragraph 10. Tenant will name the Landlord as an Additional Insured on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Policies. The Certificate(s) shall also provide the coverage may not be canceled, non - renewed, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Landlord. 11. Damage or Destruction. If the Leased Premises is destroyed or damaged, without contributory fault of the Tenant or its agents, so as, in Tenant's judgment, to hinder its effective use of the Antenna Facilities, Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease upon 30 days' written notice to Landlord. In the event Tenant elects to terminate the Lease, Tenant shall be entitled to reimbursement of prepaid rent covering the period subsequent to the date of damage to or destruction of the Leased Premises. • • • 12. Lease Termination. (a) Events of Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) of receipt of written notice of default to the other party (without, however, limiting any other rights of the parties pursuant to any other provisions hereof); (ii) by Tenant for cause if it is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other governmental approval necessary for the construction and /or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant's business; (iii) by Tenant for cause if the Leased Premises is or becomes unacceptable for technological reasons under the Tenant's Antenna Facilities, design or engineering specifications or the communications systems to which the Antenna Facilities belong; (iv) by Landlord upon twelve months prior written notice to Tenant, if its Council decides, for any reason, to discontinue use of the Structure for all purposes; (v) by Landlord if it determines, based on a report by an independent, professional structural engineer, that the Structure is structurally unsound, including, but not limited to, consideration of age of the Structure, damage or destruction of all or part of the Structure on the Leased Premises from any source, or factors relating to condition of the Leased Premises; (vi) or by Landlord if it determines that a potential user with a higher priority under Subparagraph 5(a) above cannot find another adequate location, or the Antenna Facilities unreasonably interfere with another user with a higher priority, regardless of whether or not such an interference was predicted in the initial interference study that was part of the application process; or (vii) by Landlord if it determines that Tenant has failed to comply with applicable ordinances, or state or federal law, or any conditions attached to government approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the Landlord's Council. (b) Notice of Termination. The parties shall give notice of termination in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested. Such notice shall be effective upon receipt as evidenced by the return receipt. All rentals paid for the Lease prior to said termination date shall be retained by Landlord. (c) Tenant's Liability for Early Termination. If Tenant terminates this Lease other than of right as provided in this Lease, Tenant shall pay to Landlord as liquidated damages for early termination, 150% of the annual rent for the year in which Tenant terminates, unless Tenant terminates during the last year of any Term under Paragraph 4 and Tenant has paid the annual rental for that year. (d) Site Restoration. In the event that this Lease is terminated or not renewed, Tenant shall have 60 days from the termination or expiration date to remove its Antenna Facilities, and related equipment from the Leased Premises, repair the site and restore the surface of the Structure. If Landlord removes the Antenna Facilities or related equipment, Landlord must give written notice to Tenant informing Tenant that Antenna Facilities or related property have been removed and will be deemed abandoned if not claimed and the storage not claimed and the storage fees and other reasonable costs paid within thirty (30) days. 13. Limitation of Landlord's Liability. If Landlord terminates this Lease other than as of right as provided in this Lease, or Landlord causes interruption of the business of Tenant or for any other Landlord breach of this Lease, Landlord's liability for damages to Tenant shall be limited to the actual and direct costs of equipment removal, relocation or repair and shall specifically exclude any recovery for value of the business of Tenant as a going concern, future expectation of profits, loss of business or profit related damages to Tenant. 14. Temporary Interruptions of Service. If Landlord determines that continued operation of the Antenna Facilities would cause or contribute to an immediate threat to public health and /or safety (except for any issues associated with human exposure to radio frequency emissions, which is regulated by the federal government), Landlord may order Tenant to discontinue its operation. Tenant shall immediately comply with such an order. Service shall be discontinued only for the period that the immediate threat exists. If Landlord does not give prior notice to Tenant, Landlord shall notify Tenant as soon as possible after its action and give its reason for taking the action. Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant or any other party for any interruption in Tenant's service or interference with Tenant's operation of its Antenna Facilities, except as may be caused by the willful misconduct of the Landlord, its employees or agents. If the discontinuance extends for a period greater than three days, either consecutively or cumulatively, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease within its sole discretion. 15. Tenant Interference. (a) With Structure. Tenant shall not interfere with Landlord's use of the Structure and agrees to cease all such actions which unreasonably and materially interfere with Landlord's use thereof no later than three business days after receipt of written notice of the interference from Landlord. In the event that Tenant's cessation of action is material to Tenant's use of the Leased Premises and such cessation frustrates 9 Tenant's use of the Leased Premises, within Tenant's sole discretion, Tenant shall have the immediate right to terminate this Lease. (b) With Higher Priority Users. If Tenant's Antenna Facilities cause impermissible interference with higher priority users as set forth under Subparagraph 5(a) above or with pre- existing tenants, Tenant shall take all measures necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 48 hours after receiving Landlord's written notice of the interference, Tenant shall immediately cease operating its Antenna Facilities and shall not reactivate operation, except intermittent operation for the purpose of testing, until the interference has been eliminated. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 30 days after Tenant received Landlord's written notice, Landlord may at its option terminate this Lease immediately. (c) Interference Study - New Occupants. Upon written notice by Landlord that it has a bona fide request from any other party to lease an -area including or in close proximity to the Leased Premises ( "Leased Premises Area "), Tenant agrees to provide Landlord, within sixty (60) days, the radio frequencies currently in operation or to be operated in the future of each transmitter and receiver installed and operational on the Leased Premises at the time of such request. Landlord may then have an independent, registered professional engineer of Landlord's choosing perform the necessary interference studies to determine if the new applicant's frequencies will cause harmful radio interference to Tenant. Landlord shall require the new applicant to pay for such interference studies, unless the Landlord or other higher priority user requests the use. In that event, the Tenant and all other tenants occupying the Leased Premises Area shall pay for the necessary interference studies, pro rata. (d) Interference - New Occupants. Landlord agrees that it will not grant a future lease in the Leased Premises Area to any party who is of equal or lower priority to Tenant, if such party's use is reasonably anticipated to interfere with Tenant's operation of its Antenna Facilities. Landlord agrees further that any future lease of the Leased Premises Area will prohibit a user of equal or lower priority from interfering with Tenant's Antenna Facilities. Landlord agrees that it will require any subsequent occupants of the Leased Premises Area of equal or lower priority to Tenant to provide Tenant these same assurances against interference. Landlord shall have the obligation to eliminate any interference with the operations of Tenant caused by such subsequent occupants. If such interference is not eliminated, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease or seek injunctive relief against the interfering occupant, at Tenant's expense. 16. Assignment. This Lease, or rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Tenant except (I) to Tenant's parents, affiliates or subsidiaries, (ii) to any successor in interest of all or substantially all of the assets, stock or business of Tenant to which this Agreement pertains, (iii) to any other entity to which Tenant transfers ownership of, and /or management responsibility for, a majority of its antenna support tower in the market in which the facility is located, or (iv) to any 10 0 partnership or entity resulting from that certain U.S. Wireless Alliance Agreement between Vodafone AirTouch Plc. and Bell Atlantic Corporation, which assignment or transfer shall fully release Tenant from any further obligations or liability under the terms of this Agreement commencing on the effective date of the assignment or transfer. A person, association, partnership, corporation or joint -stock company, trust, or other business entity, however organized, is an affiliate of the person or entity which directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such person. Control shall be defined as (i) ownership of 20% or more of the voting power of all classes of voting stock or (ii) ownership of 20% or more of the beneficial interests in income and capital of an entity other than a corporation. As to other parties, this Lease may not be sold, assigned, or transferred without the written consent of the Landlord, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld ,delayed or conditioned. 17. Condemnation. In the event the whole of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain, this Lease shall terminate as of the date title to the Leased Premises vests in the condemning authority. In event a portion of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain, either party shall have the right to terminate this Lease as of said date of title transfer, by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. In the event of any taking under the power of eminent domain, Tenant shall not be entitled to any portion of the reward paid for the taking and the Landlord shall receive full amount of such award. Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any portion Ill thereof. Although all damages, whether awarded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Premises, shall belong to Landlord, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority, but not from Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant on account of any and all damage to Tenant's business and any costs or expenses incurred by Tenant in moving /removing its equipment, personal property, Antenna Facilities, and leasehold improvements. 18. Disputes. Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Lease not resolved within ten (10) days following notice of the dispute, shall be submitted first and promptly to mediation. Each party shall bear its own costs of mediation. If mediation does not result in settlement within forty -five (45) days after the matter was submitted to mediation, either party may file a claim in arbitration in accordance with the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association. The award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered as a judgment in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be conducted in the county where the Leased Premises is located. Arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy of the parties. 19. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees. In the event that either party to this Lease shall bring a claim in arbitration to enforce any rights hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of such claim. • 20. Notices. All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (or any other address that the party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): If to Landlord, to: City of Lino Lakes Public Services Director 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 If to Tenant, to: AirTouch Communications, Inc. 3350 - 161st Avenue Southeast Bellevue, WA 98088 -1329 Attn: Real Estate -Mail Stop 223 Telephone: (425) 747 -4900 with a copy to: AirTouch Cellular 8401 Wayzata Boulevard - Suite 110 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Attn: Real Estate 21. Authority. Each of the individuals executing this Lease on behalf of the Tenant or the Landlord represents to the other party that such individual is authorized to do so by requisite action of the party to this Lease. 22. Binding Effect. This Lease shall run with the Leased Premises. This Lease shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 23. Complete Lease; Amendments. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and supersedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreement of any kind. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any modification of or amendment to this Lease must be in writing and executed by both parties. 24. Governing Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 25. Severability. If any term of this Lease is found be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. 26. Memorandum. Lessor agrees to execute a Memorandum of Agreement contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, in a form recordable in the official records of the county where the Property is located. In the event the Property is 12 encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Landlord agrees to furnish to Tenant a non - disturbance and attornment instrument for each such mortgage or deed of trust. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF LINO LAKES TENANT: By Its Mayor By Its City Clerk AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATONS, INC. d /b /a Air ouch.9,ellular By `r �-�� l -�17.'zeta Chris S. Neisinger 1 Its Director, Operations & Engineering 13 • ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this i day of 16(u.alu , 2000, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Chris Neisinger as the Network Operations Director of AirTouch Communications, Inc., d /b /a AirTouch Cellular, a Delaware corporation under the laws of Delaware, on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Publ - Minnesota • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT r -., Cheryl L Hansen g = Notary Public - Minnesota Hennepin County .,.,.: My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000, by , the Mayor and by , the City Administrator respectively of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public - Minnesota • • • • EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF LAND The Land is described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, Outlot A, Outlot B, Outlot C, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the following parcels: Lot 2 and that part of Lot 3, Block 1 of the recorded plat of APOLLO BUSINESS PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southwesterly of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A ". Said "Line A" is decribed as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly, along the northwesterly line of said Lots 2 and 3, a distance of 418.92 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A "; thence southeasterly, at a right angle, to the southeasterly line of said Lot 3 and said "Line A" there terminating. That part of Outlot A, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota lying east of a line decribed as commencing at the northwest corner thereof, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 14 mintutes East along the north line of said Outlot A, a distance of 460.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be decribed; thence South 0 degrees 02 minutes 36 seconds East 355.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 52 minutes 56 seconds East 192.05 feet more or less to the southerly line of said Outlot A and there terminating. Lot 1, Block 2, together with the northeasterly 10 feet of Outlot B, all in Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of Outlot B, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the most notherly corner of said Outlot B; thence on an assumed bearing of South 58 degrees 02 minutes 08 seconds West along the northwesterly line of said Outlot B 126.35 feet; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and along a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 799.00 feet, a central angle of 17 degrees 50 minutes 56 seconds and an arc length of 248.91 feet; thence South 40 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds West along said northwesterly line and tangent to said curve 75.00 feet; thence South 49 degrees 48 minutes 48 seconds East 323.37 feet to the southeasterly line of Outlot B and there terminating. Except the northeasterly 10.00 feet thereof. MIN LINOLAKES -1 EXHIBIT B 102' A.G.L. "'TIP OF ANTENNAS • • A.G.L. w GRADE I' f ' i 4 4 4 Ii I, I Page 1 of 2 SECTOR. 104° AZIMUTH, FOUR ANTENNAS EXISTING PAINTERS RING 'X' SECTOR. 344° AZIMUTH, FOUR ANTENNAS. BEYOND 'Z' SECTOR, 224° AZIMUTH FOUR ANTENNAS �"------- EXISTING WATER TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) • • • • • MIN LINOLAKES -1 EXHIBIT B .y ii iii I r NaS®io2. --41110111P-416.. AC I `� i . ' . 0. 1 '' '1/4 ` I � • I .." , Nik N 114 SPRINT l: MEZZ . 0 . r , i ,/ XTEL: • - -" 'EQUIP 1 P; / A l !CAB I NL;T I 1 Page 2 of 2 AC UNIT 8 AIRTOUCH 12 X 20 BUILDING ACCESS TO i l T VAULT BELOW s`,ELEC MISC NK ' 446f .d' .per. ■Ale EQUIP LADDER z �„�"♦ d •• SITE PLAN 48 12 • • • MIN LINOLAKES FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: AirTouch Cellular Attn: Real Estate 8401 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 110 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 MEMORANDUM OF SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ORIGINAL This Memorandum of Site Lease Agreement is entered into on this day of , 2000, by and between City of Lino Lakes, with an office at 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord ") and AirTouch Communications, Inc., d /b /a AirTouch Cellular, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware with an office at 3350 161st Avenue S.E., P.O. Box 91211; Bellevue, Washington 98009 -9211 (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant "). 1. Landlord and Tenant entered into a Communications Site Lease Agreement ( "Agreement ") on the day of , 2000, for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a radio communications facility and other improvements. All of the foregoing are set forth in the Agreement. 2. The term of the Agreement is for five (5) years commencing on , 2000 or , 2000, whichever first occurs ( "Commencement Date "), and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date with three (3) successive five (5) year options to renew. 3 The Land which is the subject of the Agreement is described in Exhibit A annexed hereto. The portion of the Land being leased to Tenant (the "Premises ") is described in Exhibit B annexed hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: By: Date: Title: Tax ID #: 15 TENANT: AirTouch Communications, Inc. d /b /a AirTouch Cellular Date: 2% 7 /'7004., Title: Di r�c �� C� �v�,�,� -�5 �zN� �,if1. � � ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this l day of �h■r(A , 2000, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared Chris Neisinger as the Network Operations Director of AirTouch Communications, Inc., d /b /a AirTouch Cellular, a Delaware corporation under the laws of Delaware, on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand acid affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Publi • Minnesota Y• Cheryl L Hansen Notary Public - Minnesota Hennepin County My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000, by , the Mayor and by , the City Administrator respectively of the City of Lino Lakes on behalf of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public - Minnesota • EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF LAND The Land is described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, Outlot A, Outlot B, Outlot C, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the following parcels: Lot 2 and that part of Lot 3, Block 1 of the recorded plat of APOLLO BUSINESS PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southwesterly of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A ". Said "Line A" is decribed as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly, along the northwesterly line of said Lots 2 and 3, a distance of 418.92 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A "; thence southeasterly, at a right angle, to the southeasterly line of said Lot 3 and said "Line A" there terminating. That part of Outlot A, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota lying east of a line decribed as commencing at the northwest corner thereof, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 14 mintutes East along the north line of said Outlot A, a distance of 460.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be decribed; thence South 0 degrees 02 minutes 36 seconds East 355.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 52 minutes 56 seconds East 192.05 feet more or less to the southerly line of said Outlot A and there terminating. Lot 1, Block 2, together with the northeasterly 10 feet of Outlot B, all in Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of Outlot B, Apollo Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the most notherly corner of said Outlot B; thence on an assumed bearing of South 58 degrees 02 minutes 08 seconds West along the northwesterly line of said Outlot B 126.35 feet; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and along a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 799.00 feet, a central angle of 17 degrees 50 minutes 56 seconds and an arc length of 248.91 feet; thence South 40 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds West along said northwesterly line and tangent to said curve 75.00 feet; thence South 49 degrees 48 minutes 48 seconds East 323.37 feet to the southeasterly line of Outlot B and there terminating. Except the northeasterly 10.00 feet thereof MIN LINOLAKES -1 EXHIBIT B 102' A.G.L. "TIP OF ANTENNAS • • $ GRADI=A.G.L. Page 1 of 2 SECTOR, 104° AZIMUTH, FOUR ANTENNAS EXISTING PAINTERS RING 'X' SECTOR, 344° AZIMUTH, FOUR ANTENNAS, BEYOND 'Z' SECTOR, 224° AZIMUTH FOUR ANTENNAS E_`EXISTING WATER TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) • • 33 MIN LINOLAKES -1 EXHIBIT B �y. FouStFANT FNNA4 • A, s ® MUTN. Page 2 of 2 8 UNIT AC UNIT AIRTOUCH 12 X 20 BUILDING ACCESS TO VAULT • • SPRINT MEZZ VAULT BELOW � %\ELEC MISC EQUIP LAODER� fc: „r ,1NtXTEL ;EQUIP ;CAB I NET J 12 •® /' \P� 0.H. DOOR 4 fie ir � ti°, • SITE PLAN 48 • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director DATE: February 7, 2000 TOPIC: Consideration of Accepting 2000 Park Board Goals Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The Park Board has discussed possible park and trail improvements the past few months. The Park Board approved the 2000 Goals listed below at the February 7, 2000 Park Board Meeting. 1. Install playground equipment at Brandywood Park 2. Trail renovation throughout trail system 3. Complete development of Behm's Century Farm Park 4. Pave trails in Behm's development (partial) OPTIONS: 1. Accept the Park Board goals as presented. 2. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 sw /rick/Green Sheet Consideration of Accepting 2000 Park Board Goals.doc $ 35,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,000.00 TOTAL $100,000.00 • • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 5C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Authorization to Advertise for Playground Equipment Bids - Brandywood Park Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: I am requesting authorization to advertise for playground equipment bids for Brandywood Park. Vendors will be given a maximum dollar amount of $27,000.00. They will be expected to design separate play equipment structures that will service pre - schoolers and elementary school age children. All proposals are expected to meet requirements set forth in the American with Disabilities Act. All equipment in these bids must meet guidelines as published by the United States Products Safety Commission. After receiving the bids, the project will be evaluated by city staff and the Park Board, with input from area residents through scheduled playground equipment reviews at city hall from March 6 — 9. The project will be awarded to the vendor that provides the city with the best value for the funds available. The best value analysis will include an evaluation of quality, durability, safety, equipment longevity, aesthetic appeal, and the play experience provided. After review a recommendation will then be made to the City Council for the purchase of playground equipment. (Monday, March 13th Council Meeting) The playground equipment will be installed using a certified playground installer (provided by vendor), city staff, and neighborhood volunteers. This will be done on a Saturday in May - July. Once the playground equipment is installed, city staff will install the safety surface and borders to meet ADA specifications. RECOMMENDATION: It is my recommendation that the City Council pass a motion authorizing staff to advertise for bids for playground equipment at Brandywood Park. sw /rick/greensheet Authorization to Advertise for Playground Equipment Bids - Brandywood Park.doc • AGENDA ITEM 6 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: January 24, 2000 TOPIC: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01 -2000 Amending the Zoning Ordinance to add Temporary Batch Plant as an Interim Use in the LB Zoning District VOTE REQUIRED: 4/4 Vote on Ordinance Amendment DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This item is the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01 -2000 Establishing Temporary Concrete Batch Plant as an Interim Use in the Limited Business Zoning District. This Ordinance received its first reading on 1/24/00 at which time the Council also approved an Interim Use Permit for Shafer Contracting to establish such a plant on the Tagg property at 7504 Lake Drive for the resurfacing of I 35W this Spring. • Staff would recommend approval of this Second Reading. • OPTIONS: 1. Approve Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01 -2000 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its ORDINANCE NO. 01 - 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY CONCRETE BATCH PLANT AS AN INTERIM USE IN THE LIMITED BUSINESS (LB) ZONING DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 7, Subd. 2. F of the City Zoning Ordinance (LB, Limited Business Interim Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: 1. Temporary Concrete Batch Plant Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th Day of February, 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: First Reading, Ordinance No. 02 -2000 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to Add Exterior Storage as an Accessory Use with a Conditional Use in the Light Industrial Zoning District VOTE REQUIRED: 4/4 Vote DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Staff is requesting the City Council consider amending the Zoning Ordinance to add Exterior Storage as an accessory use in the Light Industrial Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit. The draft ordinance is attached for your information and includes the following special provisions: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring use, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3 Subd. 4.S. of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. Outdoor storage as an accessory use was originally a part of the Zoning Ordinance in this section but was deleted when the City adopted Ordinance No. 31 -97 which made open and outdoor storage an interim use in the LI Zoning District, when the storage is a principle use. This action was taken to facilitate the exterior storage for Molin Concrete • • • as an interim use. We believe it should remain in the ordinance as a conditional use when it is accessory to the principle use. The City's Economic Development Advisory Board has concurred with this recommendation and the Planning & Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on 1/12/00 to review the amendment. The P & Z recommended some additional conditions which have been added to the Ordinance and moved approval of the text amendment on a 7/0 vote. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt First Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -2000 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its ORDINANCE NO. 02 - 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING OPEN AND OUTDOOR STORAGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE LIGHT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONING DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 8, Subd. I. 1 of the City Zoning Ordinance LI, (Light Industrial Zoning District) is hereby amended to add the following: 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use provided that: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th Day of February, 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted. • • • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 11, 2000 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Item 6.B. First Reading, Ordinance No. 02 -2000, Amend Zoning Ordinance to add Exterior Storage as a Conditional Use in the LI, Light Industrial Zoning District. Following the 2 -9 -00 Council Work Session discussion staff would propose the following amendment to Ordinance No. 02 -2000. a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts and public rights of way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S. of the Zoning Ordinance. The storage area shall be screened 100% from residential properties. Should the Council adopt this Ordinance as amended, Staff will prepare a revised Ordinance for the Second Reading, scheduled for 2- 28 -00. A • • AGENDA ITEM 6 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: H & L Mesabi, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Minor Subdivision VOTE REQUIRED: Minor Subdivision, Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit - 3% Vote On All DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: H & L Mesabi is requesting a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit for outside storage and a Minor Subdivision to allow the construction of a 15,000 square-foot office, warehouse and distribution facility at 3XX Apollo Drive. The company began in 1985 as a mining supply company located on the Iron Range. In 1990 they expanded to the Twin Cities with a distribution facility for snow plow blades, cutting edges, construction and aggregate supply items and equipment. The industries they serve include aggregate processing, construction and government. They have an employee base of nine. The property is Zoned LI, Light Industrial and indicated as commercial /industrial on our Land Use Plan. The property is located within the Apollo Business Center. MINOR SUBDIVISION: The undeveloped parcels in the Apollo Business Center are unplatted, therefore, any development in the area requires subdivision. The minimum lot size required per City Code is one acre with 100' of lot width. The proposed division will create a lot approximately 3.5 acres in size with 300+ feet of frontage. Staff would recommend approval of the minor subdivision with the following conditions: 1. A certificate of survey is provided including the following detail: a. Drainage and utility easement subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. b. Shared driveway easement on the south/eastern portion of the site. c. Dedication of remaining right of access to Anoka County. 2. Park dedication as required by City Ordinance (based on square footage of proposed construction) • • • SITE PLAN REVIEW: The site plan provides for a 15,000 square foot building containing approximately 2500 square feet of office area, 6000 square feet of warehouse and 6500 square feet of service area. Ten employees are anticipated with the initial development. Parking: The Ordinance provides the following parking requirements: Office: 3 spaces plus 1/200 sq. ft. of floor area (15.5 required) Warehouse: 1/2000 sq. ft. plus 1 /company owned truck if stored outside (3 required) Service /Distribution: 1 /employee (3 employees in this area) (3 required) Total per Ordinance: 21.5 - The site plan has provided a total of 21 spaces. Staff would find this number acceptable. The parking area, access drives and loading area are shown as bituminous surfacing with concrete curb and gutter. Staff has agreed that the exterior storage area would be allowed on the western side of the building and on the rear of the parcel. A landscaping /fencing plan has been negotiated with the developer and our Environmental Specialist that should effectively screen the exterior storage. The area to be used for exterior storage is shown on the site plan as crushed granite. The City Engineer has reviewed the surfacing request and recommends approval of the materials indicated or an acceptable alternative. A shared driveway agreement will be required to provide access to the site and Anoka County has requested dedication of remaining right of access to the County. Exterior: The building exterior has an elevation of 30' with 8' precast panels random rib & smooth face (aggregate finish). Accent colors have not been indicated on the plan. Lighting has been shown on the plan and appears to meet City requirements (no wall - packs will be allowed). All lighting is to be hooded and directed downward. Any rooftop heating /ventilating equipment must be screened or visually blended with the building coloring. The trash handling area must be screened from the Apollo Drive right -of -way and adjacent properties. • • • Landscaping: The original landscaping plan has been revised and reviewed by our Environmental Specialist who concludes that adequate screening should be provided with the plantings shown on the plan. Environmental Review: The Environmental Board's recommendations included the establishment of natural vegetation where practical, work with Environmental Specialist on site plantings, lighting considerations and the minimization of potential oil and other hazardous materials from entering ground water system. Staff believes these concerns have been addressed. Grading. Drainage & Utilities: The City Engineer has reviewed the grading, drainage and utility plans. Item No. 1 on his memo has been resolved and crushed granite approved. His recommendations are included in the conditions of approval. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: The following Conditional Use Permit review assumes that the Council has approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would reinstate open and outdoor storage as an accessory use via a conditional use permit, in the light industrial zoning district. Provisions include the following as outlined in Ordinance No. 02 -2000: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring use, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S. of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. Staff has received a revised landscaping /fencing plan approved by the Environmental Specialist and agreed to by the applicant. We believe outside storage is appropriate in this location as it meets the above criteria and abuts the Correctional Facility. It has been 3 • • • our policy, in dealing with inquiries on the Apollo Business Center, to discourage outdoor storage uses on the 35W side of Apollo and direct these businesses to the north. We believe outdoor storage adjacent to the Correctional Facility would not be detrimental to the overall development of the Business Center and is more appropriate than along the freeway. Additionally, according to Section 2, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance, B 7. Standards. "The Planning & Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and /or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and water systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions or operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. In summary, staff would recommend approval of this minor subdivision, site plan review and conditional use permit with the following conditions: Minor Subdivision: 1. A certificate of survey is provided including the following detail: d. Drainage and utility easement subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. e. Shared driveway easement on the south/eastern portion of the site. f. Dedication of remaining right of access to Anoka County. 2 Park dedication is provided as required by City Ordinance (based on square footage of proposed construction). Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit: • • • 1. Proper building permits are obtained and include a 1% escrow deposit to insure completion of site improvements. 2. Permits are obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3. Final grading, drainage and utility plans are to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 4. The storage and parking areas are to be surfaced as approved by the City Engineer, this would include a bituminous material for the parking /maneuvering area and an acceptable alternative for the storage areas. 5. Drainage easements must be recorded for ponding areas and conveyance through neighboring site. Proof of recording must be submitted prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 6. Right of Access is granted to Anoka County excluding driveway easement area 7. The Environmental Coordinator shall review and approve landscaping and lighting plans. 8. City staff shall review and approve fencing detail and screening of trash handling area. 9. Rooftop heating and ventilating units must be screened or visually blended with the building coloring. 10. The site plan shall maintain 10% green area upon full development. 11. Exterior storage shall meet with the requirements of Ordinance No. 02 -2000 as approved by the City Council. Material used to surface the storage area must be acceptable to the City Engineer. The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on Wednesday, November 10, 1999. At that meeting the board approved this minor subdivision, site plan review and conditional use permit on a 6 -0 vote. Following the P & Z review, staff found that the section of the Ordinance allowed exterior storage as a conditional use permit had been deleted with the adoption of Ordinance No. 31 -97. As explained in the previous Council item, we feel that deletion was in error. We therefore processed the previously discussed text amendment. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon adoption of Ordinance No. 02 -2000 by the City. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Minor Subdivision with conditions outlined above. 2. Approve Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit with conditions outlined above. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 and 2 LV 1 1. AUDI 6 SD4DIV1$10 ri\ P I2 Po_ v.5•4 • • viNNl) is \' /0 NO /3 /2 N t0 =Br AtkaW FA. 14 ,/s Al liffriLL, ma-, reEMAPIIJIRM /9 ANUS s ��O�A1�11�11111d1�osaaaoaa °°;o c - Ta o.P IIo am-o:od! �������I - - - - -- • o v 9iiill. 111 1 alQy�. ✓i�'7 �iitt�����'�YOl CFA o OQiO Well.. 0 NORTH LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENT 1 !=-1-1.114.- a - ....-A-X-1H: u., GEORGE MARSHAN LAKE Memorandum DATE: November 4, 1999 TO: Mary Kay W land FROM: John Powell RE: H & L Mesabi Preliminary PIa Review Comments Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 1) A detail specifying the gradation of the crushed granite surface has been requested but not yet received. Gravel parking lots are not allowed on improved sites. A gravel surface will allow liquids dripped from vehicles to soak into the ground. It is also subject to erosion and alteration of the lot elevations after the final surface elevations have been established. 2) A legend detailing the various line types needs to be shown on the plan sheet. 3) This property drains across the property to the east before entering the pond. Easements covering the drainage way across the neighboring property - pon • -mus • = recorded with Anoka County. Prior to issuanc of a •wilding permi e City will need proof that these ements :ve -bee ecorded. Calculations verifying the pond capacity have not yet been received. 4) Comments have not yet been received from Rice Creek Watershed District. Street and Utility Plans 1) The storm sewer details must be changed to the appropriate City details. 2) The fire hydrant located at the northeast comer of the proposed building is too close to the building. An alternate location may be the island along the east property line. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota »014 -1181 nl �r • n.., ',enn _ r_. •, nn, ',.nn _ trill. CC1 00'1 fl 41n • 3) The sanitary sewer service shall be SDR 26, not SDR 35 as indicated. 4) The separation between the sanitary sewer service and the water service must be a minimum of 10 feet horizontally, or 18 inches vertically. 5) The size of the water service should be increased to four inches or constructed of another material to minimize the number of joints. 6) This property will access Apollo Drive, a County road, via a shared driveway. This will be the only access to the property. Any work within the County right -of -way will require a permit. If you have any questions, please let me know. • • • fAcV). `� v �rn �'V�Q,u cQ ►P� Oak Brook Per inapla Drainage Easement The Environmental Board recommends that the city retain easements for the flexibility that they provide. This easement location in particular is an ecologically sensitive location for future trail access consideration. J.P. added this is an ecologically significant area and future trail access might be a consideration (although very expensive) can be pointed out when it comes up. 11 & L Mesabi/Apollo Drive 1. Natural vegetation established is recommended in lieu of sod where practical design standards may be applied. 2. Work with city Environmental Specialist in choosing plants appropriate to the site. Consider native indigenous prairie plants that are presently re- establishing themselves on site. 3. All outdoor lighting should be both energy efficient and environmentally friendly. The citizens of Lino Lakes enjoy the night sky and the animals that fly through it. High intensity lighting or lighting that is allowed to scatter over a large area diminishes the ability to view these amenities. Therefore, lighting shall be low - impact, low in stature, downwardly focussed, and no spill. 4. Crushed granite is considered an impervious service. Considering this, where does this put us in terms of our zoning requirements for use of this space? 5. The Environmental Board is concerned that the site and site usage be designed to minimize the potential for oil and other hazardous materials to enter the water system. Potential pollution from equipment (used or otherwise prone to leakage) stored on the site should be actually considered when this project is reviewed. 1461 94TH LANE N.E. BLAINE, MN 55449 PHONE 612.783.1552 FAX 612.783.1558 • H & L MESABI COMPANY PROFILE H & L Mesabi Company was founded by Bernard Carey and Carl D'Quila in 1985 as a mining supply company located in northeastern Minnesota's Mesabi Iron Range. Several years of company growth resulted in diversification and expansion of product lines. The firm currently ranks near the top of Minnesota's mining and construction equipment and supply distributors. In January of 1990 H & L Mesabi expanded their operation with the opening of a new Twin Cities office located in New Brighton, MN. In January of 1992 H & L Mesabi moved to their current location in Blaine, MN. This move allowed for further sales and distribution growth within the trade area of the Twin Cities and central and southern Minnesota. H & L Mesabi's Twin City operation currently distributes products such as snow plow blades, cutting edges, construction and aggregate supply items and equipment to approximately 1500 customers on an annual basis. The industries served out of the Twin Cities office are aggregate processing, construction and governmental customers. Today, H & L Mesabi proudly represents and distributes products for approximately twenty -five manufacturers. H & L Mesabi - Metro currently employs nine employees in the Blaine location with expectations of adding employees in the proposed facility in Lino Lakes scheduled for Fall 2000 GENERAL OFFICE: 2919 EAST BELTLINE • P.O. BOX 909 • HIBBING, MN 55746 • PHONE 218.263.6845 • FAX 218.262.5025 • Snow Plow Blades • 1 5- • • PAPER, CALMENSON & CO. ,1ein «h Office: 1461 9461 lane N.E. Blaine: MN 55449 Phone: (612) 783•1552 FAX. (612) 783-1558 (800) 992 -5985 H &L MESABI General Office: 2919 E. Belo.* P.O. Box 909 Khh.nn MN 55740 kliehlgan P.O. Box 69 25 Midway kxfustrial Park Road Nepaunee. MI 49666 Phone: (906) 226 -2804 FAX: (906) 226-3265 • Neill offer ales • • PAPER, CALMENSON & CO. G•n•f•101fice 2919 East Benline PO Bok 909 iirtshing. MN 55746 111.4-L MESABI Twin City ()(heft: 1461 9419 lane 94 E Blaine. MN 55449 Phone' 1612)783.1557 kfic-hig•n Office 70 Bo 69 25 fardway Indus1nal Park Pa Nerjaunee. MI 49866 COMPLETE SELECTION OF VIBRATING SCREENS t---i-GRADAITI e -SC1R I Sizes range ro 3 x 1 0' I t , 1 Atm! 4 - I two or three mri 1 I NEM ----- 4 ; ' -,,77. -74',.. , i 1 —f•—HIGH-AN LE-SCR 1 AS .1 m) Available vith tWo or three d4ckslin sizes i ize e-wl li I fr m 41 x 2—(t2 M x 3.6-rri) to6.-x16-1---to decks. 1 ING-SdREENS range 2.4 lnrn 3 x 11(:)' ( ( x 6.1 11 i I I ; , i I (1Bmx4.9m).: x 3.1 m) ror-ihree pioneer uct r uireine - ----match-the ant-t uctis! s. ne our-cru • • el i 1 e screen, n o pioneer scre i _screas aritys4tsizes these p e plants, featurelrugged serni chassis, ing-sOread-forithe-high-volume,--low m 4 I • I • ns o work elt-frulfipte-si es with our ighwayjportable Care_engine 4 4/• ce youtspecific nveyors and all 1 el nc power. pot,. ns iallow you to , - . 1 intenanee-productton -eipeCt-frOm-Pioneer-prod- ;_ • Because PoneciPioneer may use 10 0. catalogs and lberaXe. fetid photographs 04 41. products which may have been notified by the Ownerb products furnished by Portetirfoneer may not necessarily be as Mustrated therein. Also con- linrous design progress makes it necessary that specifications be subject to change without notioe. M sales of the pnoducts of Poneorionser ars subject to to provisions 04 41. standard warranty. Portecirsoneer does not warrant or represent NW its products meet any federal, sues or roil statues, codes, OrtanenCeS. miss. standards or other repo- including OSHA and MSH& covering safety. poluion. electrtal wiring, etc. Cornpiancs with these statutes and regulations ie the responsibility 04 1* user and WU be dependent upon the area and the use lo Wichita' p0.0004 10 put by the user. In son* plemcgraphsguards may have bean removed for illustrative purposes only. This equines shoukl not be operated .00004 049.0.00 attached 41 .1000 normal position. Ptacernent of guards and caws safety equipment is often dependent upon the area and the use ki Wadi Me product 0.p A safety study should be Medi by the user 04 10. application, and. if required. ackfaional guattia %gamin skins and other safety devices should be entailed by the VW. whenwer appropriale before Metal:XI ale products. Ithlr MESABI General Office: 2919 East Beltline P.O. Box 909 Hibbing. MN 55746 Twin City Office: 1461 94th Lane N.E. Blaine. MN 55449 Phone: (612) 783-1552 Engineered and Manufactured by: PORTEC Construction Equipment Division PIONEER PRODUCTS 700 West 21ST STREET • P.O. BOX 20 VA AILITelAl CflI ITLJ C71170 • L �S�ie� 11 & 12 PORTABLE CONVEYORS . A0, 50,10, & 70' • ADJUSTABLE DISCHARGE HEIGHTS RECEIVING TROUGH 6'0 ^LONG . • HIGHWAY PORTABLE- -. SPECIAL- OPTION PACKAGES • RADIAL __STACKER OP11ONL_ QUICK DELIVERY • FEEDER CONVEYOR OPTION :11 :00 x 22.5 TRUCK TIRES • HEAVY- DUTY- COMPONENTS: BEARINGS, SHAFTS, LARGER PULLEYS & 5" DIAL- IDLER MOLL - P.O. Box 220 • 904 WEST 23rd STREET • Yankton, SD 57078 Phone: (605) 665 -8771 • FAX: (605) 665 -8858 eIL MESABI G•n•ral Office: Twin City Offks: 2919 East Bettline 1461 94th Lane N.E. P.O. Box 909 Blaine, MN 55449 Hibbing, MN 55746 Phone: (612) 783 -1552 Phone. (218) 263-8845 FAX: (612) 783 -1558 FAX. (218) 262-5025 (8001992-5985 • • t'l 1 0t„ oo -z i- 1. Y0 .M wT :A9 NMVtlO 66-9i ,ON 111103 ri nd ONOJ F- rn 0 C7 C= 0 C U) —4 rn rn z --4 0 rn z a 0 u r� Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 1999 Page 12 • Chair Schaps stated unusable back yards are unacceptable in Lino Lakes. Mr. Call noted that the Environmental Specialist has indicated that some tree loss of invasive species is acceptable. Mr. Dunn asked about the price of the homes. Mr. Malcome Allen, representative for TSM Development, stated TSM will not be building the homes. The lots will be sold. He stated the approximate price of the single family homes will be $150,00 - $210,000. The approximate price of the townhomes will be $120,000. He advised the developer has agreed to the conditions recommended by staff. He indicated he would like approval this evening. He noted that pushing Lois Lane to the north would give the developer flexibility to move the lots that would increase their depth. Ms. Carlson stated the Board does not see the Final Plat. S tom;';; e plan is not ready yet. Chair Schaps asked if the Board can continue an it- n, o bjection of the developer. Staff advised the Board may continue the issu 411 Chair Schaps stated it would be better to an to deny the project. • Mr. Allen stated he believes a vote ":i' en tonight. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION e public hearing and table Revised Highland Meadows Preliminary Pla one to the December 8, 1999, Planning and Zoning meeting, and was supp Carlson. Mr. Dunn sugges =, oper provide samples of good homes that have been built on small lots to st oard to review. He stated he likes the idea of coving. Ms. Lane stated that MOTION carried 6 -0. y plan with unusable rear yards is terrible. E. PUBLIC HEARING, 3XX Apollo Drive, H & L Mesabi, Site Plan Review & Conditional Use Permit for Exterior Storage Staff advised H & L Mesabi is requesting a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit for outside storage and a Minor Subdivision to allow the construction of a 15,000 square foot office, warehouse and distribution facility at 3XX Apollo Drive. Staff reviewed the minor subdivision and site plan review in detail. Staff recommended approval of the minor subdivision, site plan review, and conditional use permit with conditions. Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 1999 Page 13 • l�1 • Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 10:08 p.m. Mr. Tom Inman, representative from Northco, stated the use of outside storage is very important because of the nature of the business. Extremely heavy equipment is brought in and circulation is critical. A bituminous surface is too easily torn up by the heavy equipment and is high maintenance. He indicated they are open to expanding the paved area and leaving a strip open in the back. He stated they are proposing an 8' fence and the outside storage would be screened. Allowing the storage on the west side of the building will help with their internal circulation Mr. Bernie Carie, owner of H & L Mesabi, distributed a list of components they deal with. He stated all equipment will go to the back of the lot except for smaller equipment that will be screened in the front. He noted the Blaine warehouse is too small for their needs. Some of the equipment will be stored inside and the larger equipment will be stored outside. Staff advised they are willing to be flexible regarding t work with the applicant and also discuss any roadw equipment. This type of business may justify varyi f indicated they will e to the heavy al City standards. Mr. Johnson asked if there is justification f •: _ ning. Mr. Inman stated there is a natural buffer. The adjoining neighbor of moving the curb island that separates the two properties further b Staff indicated support for mov er back. Ms. Lane asked about a fu expanding the buildin future. Ms. Carlson expre system. Staff advis problems. sion. Mr. Inman advised they have no plans for oes show an alignment for approval to expand in the em regarding hazardous materials entering the City's water ome monitoring of the site will be necessary to ensure there are no Mr. Dunn asked about the possibility of scaring off other potential development because of the outside storage. Mr. Carie advised the site will not look like a storage site. The equipment is very expensive, valuable, and has a high resale value. He stated they want to take care of it properly. Staff advised they approve of the outside storage because the property abuts the prison. It is one of the few sites in the business park where outside storage would be acceptable. However, the outside storage should be contained behind the building. • Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 1999 Page 14 Mr. Corson asked if the City of Blaine has them do anything special because of the weight on the streets. Mr. Carie advised the equipment is not on the streets. It is moved with forklifts. They are strictly a distribution center. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:37 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Carlson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve Minor Subdivision based on the following conditions: 1. A certificate of survey is provide including the following detail: a. Drainage and utility easement subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. b. Shared driveway easement on the south/eastern portion of the site. c. Dedication of remaining right of access to Anoka 2. Park dedication is provided as required by City Ordi ce on square footage of proposed construction). The MOTION was supported by Mr. Dunn. M ?t, 'e' -0. . Staff noted condition #1 relating to the 'vision has been completed. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to app `: eview and Conditional Use Permit based on the following conditio • 1. Proper building permit' : ned and include a 1% escrow deposit to insure completion of site imp 2. Permits are o • : ,� fr• the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3. Final grading, Engineer. age and utility plans are to be reviewed and approved by the City 4. The storage and parking areas are to be paved with a bituminous material per the City Engineer's recommendation. 5. Drainage easements must be recorded for ponding areas and conveyance through neighboring site. Proof of recording must be submitted prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 6. Right of Access is granted to Anoka County excluding driveway easement area. 7. The Environmental Coordinator shall review and approve landscaping and lighting plans. • • Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 1999 Page 15 8. City staff shall review and approve fencing detail and screening of trash handling area. 9. Rooftop heating and ventilating units must be screened or visually blended with the building coloring. 10. The site plan shall maintain 10% green area upon full development. 11. Exterior storage shall be limited to the rear portion of the site and on the western side of the building and proposed expansion are. 12. The following conditions shall be met prior to review by the City Council: Condition #1 pertaining to the minor subdivision. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carne VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS �® VII. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Lane made a MOTION to adjourn the n :38 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully Submitted, Kim Points, Recording Se e TimeSaver Off Site Sec 1, v4P >—� .t g n 1 • EMMIWEZ CMMEMZIW I IZi a+e= M.-1re E =4 IMMEa :+ WWWWW WMMMM llt9M7912=1EM 111911999:9 tT>"r+TaCR 19'1 (;,...,,,,,z.„, » Z 0 W -J W F— u)6 342 WWWM1 7=M; 13•1199991.9= 1•190=9911 =93=1 EMMMM vemnemmeesor WMMMM f`" ) MM MMM ====; ==== ELME 191119 fir ^- UrAfai aa= • 1199==11991 1■ 9 WS MEEM mmmm » I i iiiii i ii .i) , o o / El 13 o C =Emma F ® asap a® IMMMMEME ® ] o C •F as yZ4 al 6 sm ICO z 0 w J w L2L 1— W Oa Z v N Rg IronfessEe TEWSTRIMMTTIM I=XXXCCIZI =111=11 m >o » s� IIEMISIONNIMISE 3.3.:9=15115a453.1:1 AZISECCE..1,33 0 CO • 1 5,00 SQ. FT BUILDING 1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE -EN OCCUPANCY CLASS - 15,5 11,1-14 SPRINKLER.ED PER NFPA I COLatrel MOATS OfIVS FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1 /8"=1'-0" • 4 .: PROPOSED OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR: H &LMESABI APOLLO DRIVE I)Nf1 AKPG RAT • Iw14r MI 1w pw speelmilluk K 11.04..1 r.Wrd a+. air +. INN r ARCH IT 40T NORDBY & ASS , IN • • E z $662.d=441.dY4e aQ ‘tgt ....ict b 144 2P vim VVIA ot 'I "lb ' romt1et11Rg1. ill wl••., ■.. •- iiiiii I e g i1 1 Will iIii , IiF jfl! A 1:'J fi or i" w 46011 4 of gg AA 8 A A 1 AGENDA ITEM 6 D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Trappers Crossing 3rd Addition - Final Plat VOTE REQUIRED: 34 Vote DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The Preliminary Plat for Trappers Crossing was approved by the City Council on August 8, 1994. This request involves final platting of the Third Addition which includes 35 single family lots. The property is Zoned R -1X with a PDO and indicated as residential on the City's Land Use Map. The City Attorney has reviewed the title work and found it to be acceptable. A development agreement is in place and financial guarantees posted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Staff would recommend approval of this final phase of Trappers Crossing. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Final Plat for Trappers Crossing 3rd Addition 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • imo©oommv+ei I RIM Non, laWin -•11.7 At= ‘1224M11 KMOCCEMOME IVES � MAP OF ITIES OF LINO LAKES, 'PP /II 1 F P PORT n' (IRC:I F PINFS "1. / o ( 0 A- 56•JO'1r / L -61.27 / i 06 1 .J4� as.0 , chi��,ytic.,. \I" 11^ 6L y \` VV•• le - 91, :0„. g e �Q.t'•opS :0fi\ "lei. W \ i " gl. 4 8' /b I '?Y N 7 •vf•l ^_ l N if7i. s o ti /may s cN, - A z n „V ,C • $6013., 171' • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Tom & Roxanne Traver, 6750 West Shadow Lake Road, Variance VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4 Vote DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This case involves a variance request to allow construction of a single family home at 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive within 100' of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of Reshanau Lake. The property is Zoned Rural but considered a pre- existing non- conforming lot of recorded as it was platted in 1982 prior to adoption of the 10 acre minimum requirement for rural lots and adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance. The applicant has agreed to construct the house at the 30' front setback line. The proposed setbacks are as follows: Front Setback 30' (30' required) Side Setback 20' (10' required for house, 5' for garage) OHW Setback 73' - 84'(100' required per Shoreland Ordinance on Recreational Development Lakes, unsewered) A variance of 16' - 27' from the OHW is requested. The Zoning Ordinance and the Shoreland Ordinance allow construction on nonconforming lots of record and a variance procedure. According to the Ordinance "in evaluating the variance, the City Council shall consider sewage treatment and water supply capabilities... ". The DNR must be notified of any hearings. Staff has received a recommendation from Tom Hovey, DNR Area Hydrologist concerning this request. His comments are attached and indicate that he "would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition involving vegetation is placed on the variance". He has recommended that the shore impact zone be maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The Environmental Board reviewed the request and concurred with his recommendation but suggested an unmowed area of 40' from the OHW. They also suggested the applicant work with the Environmental Specialist on modifications to the septic system that would include a pretreatment system. We believe the variance criteria can be met in review of this case. There is a hardship, not created by the property owner; the hardship is not economic; the property is unique as r • it was created prior to the adoption of the 10 acre minimum requirement in the Zoning Ordinance and the Shoreland Ordinance. There is 145' from the front property line to the OHW level. A 30' front setback and a 100' OHW setback would leave only 15' to build in thus making the property unusable. The balance of Reshanau Lake properties maintain a similar setback to that requested. The variance criteria are as follows: Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations along and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. • In summary, staff would recommend approval of the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1. The home is construct at the 30' front setback line with a varied lake setback of 71' to 84'. 2. A revised survey document is provided for building permit purposes. 3. Maintain 40' in native unmowed vegetation in the shore impact zone. Staff will be prepared to discuss the P & Z recommendation at the Council meeting as they will be reviewing this item on February 9`h. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance as requested with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 11, 2000 SUBJECT: Council Agenda Item 6. E. Traver Variance, 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their 2 -9 -00 meeting and recommended approval of the Variance request with the elimination of Condition No. 3 which required the applicant to maintain 40' in native unmowed vegetation in the shore impact zone. Staff would comment that our Shoreland Ordinance requires the shore impact zone to remain in a natural vegetative state. The Environmental Board recommended reducing this area by 10' thereby requiring the 40' unmowed area. The DNR recommended that the entire shore impact zone remain natural. For Council information, staff has worked with the shoreland property owners in the County Lakes Estates Development to maintain the shore impact zone in a natural condition and would encourage the maintenance of this requirement for any new development along the lake shore. FEB. -10' 00 (THU) 17:38 Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2000 Page 6 * * * * * ** * « * * * * *r * * ** TEL :612 421 9511 1. Shiloh Church shall enter into a facility use agreement with the Lino Lakes Seniors subject to the Seniors' lease with the City. 2. Adequate parking must continue to be available. Parking shall be reviewed annually by City Staff to assure adequate capacity for continued use of the facility by the Church. If parking becomes inadequate due to growth in Church membership, the City may require the Church to relocate. The City shall establish a reasonable amount of time for the Church to do so. 3. The Church will be allowed a temporary sign, to be placed no more than 24 hours prior to events and removed one hour following events. The sign size and other characteristics shall meet with the requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance (no flashing beacons). A sign permit is required. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Zych. Motion carried 6 -0. This item will go before the Council Monday, March 13, 2000, 6:30 p.m. C. r1.1BLIC ARIN 8, 2000), Bluebill 'Ands, Pre iminarY Pia Staff recommended the public hearing be continued to the March 8, 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting as the preliminary plat design has not been finalized. Mr. Corson asked if a continuance would impact the deadline for consideration. Mr. Smyser stated that is not an issue since a complete application has not yet been received. He updated the Board on negotiations currently underway on the road alignment. Mr. Smyser advised that property owners have petitioned for the road so staff is also working on that aspect and it is hoped the City can avoid a condemnation action. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to the March 8, 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 6- 0. A, Tom Ro ne Traver 6750 Sh w La R Vari nee P. 006 Staff advised Tom and Roxanne Traver have requested a variance to allow construction of a single- family home at 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive within one hundred e feet of but Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of Reshanau Lake. The property is considered a pre - existing non - conforming lot of record as it was platted in 1982 prior to adoption of the 10 -acre minimum requior consttnict the house the 30t�foot front setback d Ordinance. The applicant has agreed to and 20 feet from the side setback line but a variance of 16 feet to 27 feet is requested from the OHW. FEB. -10' 00 (THU) 17:38 ui( «r t t «' u t' x Planning & Zoning Board Febniary 9, 2000 Page 7 • TEL:612 421 9511 P. 007 Staff presented the required findings and criteria to consider approval of a variance and recommended approval based on findings and conditions indicated in the staff report. Chair Schaps noted that West Shadow Lake Road is designated for improvement if a bond issue is approved. He asked if this house would be about 25 feet from the curb cut if that were to occur. Mr. Smyser explained that the setback distance is measured from the edge of the right -of -way, not the pavement, and he is not aware that any additional right -of -way would be needed for that project, should it occur. Chair Schaps stated that the 40 -foot natural buffer would be one of the few on the lake. He noted that all surrounding developed lots have lawn area to the water and asked about the purpose of imposing this buffer requirement on this property. Mr. Smyser stated it would serve the purpose of a more stable lake edge and protect the lake. He stated that manicured lawns are not very stable and erode easily but a natural vegetation area is more stable. Chair Schaps stated that if this lot were the first to be developed on this lake, he could see considering this buffer requirement. However, in this case, he believed it was unfair since it is the second to the last lot being developed on this lake and this requirement has never been required of other lots. He commented on the steps being taken to improve the lake and stated he does not believe this buffer area will result in a real benefit. Chair Schaps stated that he understands its intent but in this case does not support a buffer requirement. Mr. Corson stated that he shares this concern, noting most of the back yard would be left as native material. He stated if it is required, he would suggest the buffer area start at the drainage easement rather than the OHW which is quite a distance into the lot area. Chair Schaps stated there will be a considerable amount of fill needed on this lot due to the level of the lake so any natural vegetative material will be covered. He asked the applicant for his input. Vernon Vanderlik(?), stated he is appearing on behalf of the builder and owner who were not available tonight. He stated that be is sure the applicant would appreciate the removal of the buffer requirement. However, they would comply with whatever conditions are placed. Mr. Vanderlik stated the basement will be approximately two feet above the existing grade so the fill will be at least up to the vegetative area. Ms. Lane stated if she lived on this lake she would view the buffer as an eyesore since it would only be on this single lot. Mr. Corson stated the concern is to keep sediment out of the lake, especially end o during several construction and suggested the buffer be required during con years until the landscaping is established_ FEB. -10' 00 (THU) 17:39 Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2000 • Page 8 • **.***ttttttt******t TEL 612 421 9511 P. 008 Chair Schaps stated he is confident there are neighbors all around this lot who will be watching to assure there is no sedimentation going into the lake. He stated that he shares the concern expressed by Ms. Lane and does not believe a buffer strip such as this would be appropriate for this lake. He advised of the education that has been occurring regarding the damage caused by fertilizers and progress made in that regard Chair Schaps stated this is a recreational lake and he does not believe this condition would be fair to impose on the applicant. Mr. Corson suggested that during the construction period they be required to place silt fence to eliminate sedimentation into the lake. Mr. Vanderlik stated they would not object but do intend to start construction shortly so there may be some problem with installing silt fence posts into the frozen ground. He stated it is their intent to leave the surrounding ground natural but it is the property owner's decision with regard to what happens to the groundcover after construction. He noted that this land has very little slope. Mr. Corson noted that the erosion control could be installed in the newly placed fill which would not be frozen. Chair Schaps suggested the applicant talk with several of the neighbors regarding the high water level. Ms. Lane noted the comment from the DNR saying they do not object subject to the lake setback being maximized and placing the vegetation buffer. Mr. Smyser explained that the DNR approved the City's Shoreline Ordinance but the City does have the authority to grant the variance. He advised that staff will prepare a supplemental report to convey the Boardmember's comments regarding the buffer to the City Council. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the variance request to allow construction of a single - family home at 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive within 100 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level of Reshanau Lake based on findings as indicated and on the following conditions: 1. The home is constructed at the 30 -foot front setback line with a varied lake setback of 71 feet to 84 feet. 2. A revised survey document is provided for building permit purposes. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. This item will go before the City Council Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:30 p.m. E. Anoka C41nnty Parks B h Im r• en • en a ill Lak Staff stated the application from Anoka County Parks is for a Site and Building Plan Review for four structures on the west side The Centerville is zoned PSP, Public Semi- Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. GEORGE GU - WATCH LAKE CENTERVILLE sPER"" Uuct • Cre, Awn" • S. 05Xer.). &18 r.sir' • 34"4:121 "..VA er.QAc'T 3 • 7 c • .•ty,es ,' 9O.2 • ..... Vseif've 199 7) / M C.14 '';i?• /51, ..... • .7k 1 141 4 HOP • 3 5 ••■ / • '1 / 4.wJ , ■ • / .. dj A • , a i , , 1 ` : y iv ...' ,, • • Environmental Board Recommendations January 26, 2000 Memo To Mary Kay Wyland From Marty Asleson Date: 01/27/00 Re: Recommendations of the January 26 Environmental Board The Following recommendations were made at the January 26, 2000 Environmental Board Meeting: 1. Review of Lot 3, Bik 1 Reshanau Shores The Environmental Board recommended approval of the variance for house set -back from the OHW; That staff review the septic system; That the provisions of the shore impact zone conceming the preservation of native vegetation in the shore impact zone be addressed and includes a recognition that a 40 foot strip of vegetation from the ordinary high water level be preserved with native vegetation. Motion By J.P. Touchiness Second By Scott Canyon Motion approved. • Page 1 January 26, 2000 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR Waters - Metro Region, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793 Telephone: (651) 772 -7910 Fax: (651) 772 -7977 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 RE: SETBACK VARIANCE, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, RESHANAU SHORES, CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY Dear Ms. Wyland: I have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have the following comments. It is the preference of the Department that setbacks are maximized for all new construction. It doesn't appear that lake setbacks have been maximized on this proposal. The two adjustments that seem most obvious are moving the deck to the side of the house and further reducing the street setback. It is difficult to compare the setbacks of the proposed structure with the existing structure on the lot to the north (Lot 2), as the structure to the north is measured to the survey line, which is not a reliable indicator of the location of the ordinary high water mark (elevation 883.5'). I would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition involving vegetation is placed on the variance. The shore impact zone (SIZ) should be maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The SIZ is that area adjacent to the lake equal to half of the required setback, or 50' in this case. This alone will help mitigate the negative effects of the shorter setback by providing a more stabile lake edge than mowed lawn (physically and biologically) and will help protect views from the lake. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tom Hovey Area Hydrologist DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 - 646 -6367 • TTY: 651- 296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity Pt Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a %/•' Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste CERTIFICATE OF SURCEY FOR: McCallum Construction I 1 i\ -r 1 I I L _ S./ 1 / / 1 1 I L _ / / /893.17 / EBIT / 892.82 / 892.89 EBIT /EB1T 4 886.93 HSECOR 886.01 HSECOR HSECOR •`�� HSECOR / / 886.15 / HSECOR / f ssf / / / 60* i + 883.06 / GE / / 892.6 Pr?,, c i ,.9 * 32 �� k f 0 �,` °�� ,�� /«3 2p g8GA NK 84:50 �l � Y � OPJk tC�'O • / y -T -, ■ �_ 0 00 :A.:: �i� + 884.52 N r �� 883.181 + 882.5, TOP /:: • `P� • 0007 /j\ / TOE os End 0.5" LP. -1 I ' / / EaBANK / w " �� %`' + 883.34 H.W.L. ' 4, n= 883•52 00 $SO.� E -:K 1 \ -r 1 1 I L_ . I 1 / / / / 893.21 f EBIT / / 893.05 EBIT / 889.89 GE + 881.79 G� aw ry rod/ "4/ .891$4 ()dap-. -Frjd 0.5/" I.P. + 80.86 + 887.27 G / GE 4)/ PP 83.• f + 869.5 • ? + 884.71 I I I 1 L- . / 1 \�i / /-4,_ '4883:32 :/ r 883.48 l H.W.L. 883.80 + TOE / 8.79.59 ./ GE // /883.35' + N'rN� •/ / O; Doubly ike in �" + 884.51 i TOP �r :/ • w Set, • File . -893. i GE / 883.44 �' / ,Q' r ./ / HRw.LJ S! 7b0; ...1i83.75 .•'$83.75 + / • '. GE 883.69 '88 .13 ►°j' TOE T ,t + 884.08 883.40 BITB9/1 E % H.W.L 879.66 %�Q / t. -Fn d 0.1' � I.F'. r 48 P t ' R.LS. X332 '3o s9 ' EBIT 15j 4'� + �• 891.83 / + 882.10 8zGE - 8T8O3E .0 3 + p•�; � -- BAND 919 E +•892.48 GE + 890.21 P.UN� GE •+ 885.51 GE / 892.19 / EBIT / 879.58 H2O co 4/ti CO O 879.25 Or H2O a.0 Q� w o qO Oq wUl we 3o a� 79.39 39 1 m vi m '1"-) 1/ cti 880.29 TRAVPT 879.49 H2O vJ +. 884.02 GE 1 . \ -1- / 1 I 1 /Vole: /,louse to be L -rc s /akeci by bui /oder^ NOTES, / - 2 foot Contour Interval - N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Field by E.G. & Sons on 09 -24 -1999. - Property Area = 40,600± sq.ft. (0.93± Acres) DIAG: 43.00 x 103.67 = 112.23 883E21+ Rud / I iHWt 808..48 881.61 • \ -F 0011 R. BENCHMARK: Top of C.I.M. (Witness Corner) on Lot 1, Block 1. EIev= 881.86 79.46 H2O #53 S. 32 • / (-End 0.5" I.P. *Garage Down 2cs* fliQP95ED ELEVATIONS; GARAGE FLOOR = 893.6 (dn 2cs) TOP OF BLOCK = 895.4 LOWEST FLOOR = 887.3 (12 cs w /o) TOP OF FOOTING = 887.0 LEGEND • Denotes O Denotes cm Denotes -GW-> Denotes -OHW- Denotes X1011.2 Denotes Denotes C892.Z) Denotes Denotes • Denotes Lot 3, Block 1, RESHANAU SHORES, Anoka County, Minnesota. Iron Monument Found Iron Monument Set Utility Pole Guy Wire Overhead Wire Existing Elevation. Existing Contour Proposed Elevation. Direction of Drainage. Wood Hub at 11 foot offset. Scale 1"=40' Drawn By. ERV Disk: 0 Denotes Iron Set • Denotes Iron Found Job No.: 99541 HS Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. fe 9 99 Registration No. 253444- Revise house /oca ion 28/00 E. G. RUC 4 SONS, INC LAND BURYEYOR6 SISO LEXINGTON AvE. NE CIRCLE PINES, gENESOTA 55014 -3625 TEL 6 -5556 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 6 F Jeff Smyser February 14, 2000 SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 03 -2000, Amending PDO and Rezoning A Portion of Highland Meadows 4/4 The first reading was approved January 24. This will be the second reading. This ordinance approves amendments to the Highland Meadows PDO and the rezoning of less than one acre of land from R -1 to R -3. Though this will expand the existing R -3 area, it will not increase the number of townhome units. It will reduce impacts to existing wetlands by moving a fourplex building. • OPTIONS 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 03 -2000. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 03-2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY AMENDING THE HIGHLAND MEADOWS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND REZONING CERTAIN ADDITIONAL REAL ESTATE FROM R -1 RESIDENTIAL TO R -3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by amending the Highland Meadows PDO Planned Development Overlay, created by Ordinance No. 32 -97, in order to enlarge the area zoned R -3 Medium Density Residential so that the expanded R -3 area includes, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: see attached legal description II As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. III This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: III The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. 01/19/2000 14:46 6125331937 MERILA ASSOCIATES SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION FOR TSM DEVELOPMENT R -3 REZONING, HIGHLAND MEADOWS, LINO LAKES, MN PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY DESCRIPTION: PAGE 02 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 51 minutes 14 seconds East, assumed bearing along the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1123.75 feet; thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes 48 seconds West 80.01 feet; thence South 85 degrees 47 minutes 47 seconds West 94.50 feet; thence southerly 114.83 feet, along a on tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 280.00 feet, a central angle of 23 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds and a chord which bears South 10 degrees 57 minutes 08 seconds East; thence South 0 degrees 47 minutes 47 seconds West, tangent to said curve 94.70 feet; thence southwesterly 232.13 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a radius of 190.00 feet and a central anglc of 70 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 70 degrees 47 minutes 47 seconds West, tangent to said last described curve 73.47 feet; thence southwesterly 193.28 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 170.00 feet and a central angle of 65 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds; thence South 5 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds West, tangent to said last described curve 165.31 feet thence southwesterly 105.37 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a radius of 155.00 feet and a central angle of 38 degrees 56 minutes 59 seconds; thence South 47 degrees 50 minutes 27 seconds East, not tangent to said last described curve 228.69 feet thence South 40 degrees 52 minutes 36 seconds West 72.18 feet; thence South 66 degrees 53 minutes 44 seconds West 109.50 feet; thence South 82 degrees 24 minutes 20 seconds West 106.06 feet; thence North 76 degrees 14 minutes 53 seconds West 242.02 feet; to the intersection with a line bearing North 0 degrees 51 minutes 19 seconds East from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 827.50 feet westerly from the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence South 0 degrees 51 minutes 19 seconds West 89.36 feet to the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 12 minutes 03 seconds East, along said south line 827.50 feet to the point of beginning. NOTES TO SKETCH: "This is not a Boundaty Survey" Orientation of this bearing system is based on the east line of the SW V4 of the NE' /. of Section 8 to have an assumed bearing ofN 0° 51'14"E. CERTIFICATION: ,1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am, a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed this 10th of January, 2000. Mcrila & Associates. vv. yv By: Randy M. MortoYi, Land Surveyor, License No. 21401 PROJECT NO. 9S015 JANUARY 10, 2000 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS REVISED JANUARY 19. 2000 MERILA & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 6401 734 Avenue P. sully 03 droottyn Per. MN 5$426 T4boNafte 0134317595 Fax 612033.1637 01/19/2000 14:46 6125331937 MERILA ASSOCIATES SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION FOR TSM DEVELOPMENT R -3 REZONING, HIGHLAND MEADOWS, LINO LAKES, MN SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET , 0 50 100 200 'ff 0 - SCALE IN FEET ro . o. 2, ( S 70-4747" W 73,47 �o °�' ._Q ., o • et, A 661' 461 - s 1 ` 400,1 95' of o no _.// yr 4c?... h C `O - b qf 7" \ po 40.104 SQUARE FEET OR 0.9207 ACRES + 1:44141:11:\ ?to D° PAGE 03 585'4•47'W N69'08'48"W - 94.50 - -�„ X60,0} r z ADDITIONAL R -3 ZONING, — F 1 4' p �APit, N Iv ee9.5 — ° 562-24,20'W / x106,08 / 1 W J 1� zg J 1/ m5 k Vr F 0 Z J1= 42.< ZO J S 8912'03' E SE CORNER OF THE SW 1/4 OF j THE NE 1/4 SECTION 8. SOUTH UNE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 8. TowNSr11P 31, RANGE 22. ) PROJECT NO. 99015 JANUARY 10, 2000 SHEET 10F 2 SHEETS REVISED JANUARY 19, 2000 MERILA 8401 TY4 Ar+pw Ma., %Be %4e 63 8roolayn Perk. W4 33428 & ASSOCIATES 7 2411 7696 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING • AGENDA ITEM 6 G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: -Final Plat, Lino Lakes Commercial Development JADT Development Group Northeast Quadrant, Lake Drive and I -35W CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat in April 1999. In order to approve a final plat, the City normally requires the following: 1. Final plat drawing that substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat 2. Complete development agreement 3. Financial securities as described in the development agreement 4. Title commitment approval by City Attorney • 5. Conditions of approval must be met (the conditions approved at time of preliminary plat approval) 1. Final plat drawing that substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The staff report of April 26, 1999 stated the following (refer to Attachment A, Detail of Preliminary Plat): "...Land to be included in the PDO includes only Parcel 2, Parcel 3, and Parcel 4 on the preliminary plat, sheet 4/10. The preliminary plat creates three new parcels: Block 1 Lot 1, Outlot A, and Outlot C. These provide for a site for a McDonald's restaurant, the first part of Apollo Drive, and a private road." The submitted final plat (Attachment B) shows some differences. First, the Apollo Drive alignment is slightly different. This is because the final plat uses the alignment supplied by the City. This slight adjustment in a road alignment is not a concern. More importantly, the final plat creates additional outlots. Instead of three outlots, there are now five. The reason for this is that the developer encountered difficulties acquiring a mortgage for all the property. The final plat breaks the property up in a way that allows the developer to obtain a mortgage on a portion of the site. • • Final Plat Lino Lakes Commercial Development/JADT February 14, 2000 page 2 City staff's concern with this is that the change must not create additional buildable lots. The developer's attorney has stated that the developer agrees to a stipulation that the lots are not buildable until the plat is revised. This is stated in the attached fax letter of February 4, 2000, to Bill Hawkins from Gary Gandrud. As long as the City Attorney assures us that this agreement is enforceable and the City is protected from any claim to additional buildable lots, staff can recommend approval of this arrangement. 2. Complete development agreement. 3. Financial securities as described in the development agreement. The City and the developer have been negotiating the issue of the extension of Apollo Drive. At the December 20, 1999 City Council meeting, the Council approved initiating an eminent domain action and a feasibility study for the extension of Apollo Drive. Since the Apollo Drive extension now will be a public project, the developer does not have to construct the road and utilities. Therefore, the typical development agreement, with its financial securities, is not necessary. The City will construct the road and utilities and assess the costs to the benefiting properties. 4. Title commitment approval by City Attorney. A new signature page has been submitted. The City Attorney will have reviewed it before the City Council meeting. 5. Conditions of approval must be met. Most of the conditions of approval refer to the site plan for McDonald's. These will be addressed as part of the building permit review. Other conditions apply to the construction of Apollo Drive, such as the permit from Anoka County. Since the road will be a public project constructed by the City, such things become the City's responsibility. OPTIONS 1. Approve final plat. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 02/04/00 15:38 LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AUE 4 651 982 2499 FROM FAEGRE & BENSON NO.110 P03 (FR() 2. 4' 00 13:40 /ST. 13:39/NO. 4862058850 P 2 • FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 22oo No .w sr CBNTSB, 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MiNNEApoL!$, Mne so7A S5402 -3901 TELEPHONE C Z- 3363000 W«C31M1,.6 Ott- $63O February 4, 2000 City of Lino Lakes c/o William G. Hawkins City Attorney 2140 -- 4th Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 -2268 GARY L. GANDRUT us1496xere.cern F3 r»6.3339 BY TELECQPY (612) 421-4213 Re: Development at Lake Drive and Apollo Road in Lino Lakes, Minnesota by JADT Development Dear Bill: As you know, we represent JADT Development and Timothy Baylor (collectively "Developer") in relation to the above - referenced matter, As we discussed, 1 am writing on behalf of Developer to confirm that Developer may not build on the outlots contained in the plat of Lino Lakes Commercial. Development until such time as the plat of the subdivision is revised and the proposed construction sites are laid out as regular lots in the revised plat. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you very much. GLG: Very truly yours, Gary L. Gandrud Minnrapolit Dower Des MQMCJ London Frankfurt AGENDA ITEM 6H STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 24, 2000 TOPIC: First Reading, Ordinance No. 99 -17, Easement Vacation, Oak Brook Peninsula. VOTE REQUIRED: 4/4 Vote Required BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the January 24, 2000, City Council meeting. The parties involved have agreed to mediation through Anoka County. There is no new information to present. RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the February 28, 2000, City Council meeting • • • AGENDA ITEM 61 STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 2000 -13, Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement for Water Service with the City of Hugo. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4 BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes has received a request from the City of Hugo and the developer of the Wenzel Farm subdivision for water service. The City of Lino Lakes has the capability to provide this service but other issues related to the joint powers agreement and the development as a whole must be resolved prior to approving an agreement. Additional detail on the joint powers agreement will be presented at the City Council's Work Session. Based on the Work Session discussion, a recommendation regarding action on this matter will be distributed with the Friday update. • • AGENDA ITEM 6J STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution Number 2000 -14, Order Feasibility Report, Cedar Street Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: 4/4 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The re- construction of Cedar Street from Otter Lake Road to Elmcrest Avenue was originally to be included in the contract for the re- alignment of Otter Lake Road. However, when the City became aware that Cedar Street was under consideration as an alignment for a new Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer interceptor, the work was delayed. We did not want to reconstruct the roadway then have it disturbed again by the interceptor construction. The current schedule for the interceptor project is construction in 2000. This would allow Cedar Street to also be re- constructed this year. The street re- construction will also involve utility work. City utilities have been extended to serve the GNW Machine site. They will be further extended to Elmcrest Avenue. Water system modifications in the vicinity of Well No. 4, located on the southeast corner of Cedar Street and Clearwater Creek Drive, will also be included. These modifications will be designed to enhance the City's water system pressure capabilities. No work would occur at the intersection of Otter Lake Road where it was recently re- constructed. The funding sources for the project will include City utility trunk funds and assessments previously levied against the Clearwater Creek subdivision. If the City approves a joint powers agreement with the City of Hugo for water service, a portion of the trunk funds will be immediately replaced. There may also be some costs incurred by the Metropolitan Council for the restoration of areas disturbed by their project. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -14 ordering a report on improvements for the Cedar Street Improvement project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -14 ordering a report, on improvements for the • Cedar Street Improvement project. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -14 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CEDAR STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Cedar Street from Otter Lake Road to Elmcrest Avenue, by constructing sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and streets, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Section 8 of the City Charter, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of February, 2000. • John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 14, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk PELTIER LAKE J SUBDIVISION NUMBER 47 a REVISED CRY OF t1N0 LANE! CRY OF CENTERVILLE Q� ----1� 4•�i�t —air a8 1 Ski K Gaon i 04�' rr�����iA ' � m E 2Zgr +7 lair ®® ,Ltd !•A n��a GP' ©CREEK 1 �1Oltt li ®: ts ��� epocz000 --�c°131140911, FPO E.�ziC �o00 .AKE nuirdra InalEargkralk p' � ' ] . ']YJ 3% ^1�s iQ lea L .,, ©OD .n�; F � po v ` . orir; ;' .. P. ��` �► E Dil daa;i� RQ.►OWilii °eo Rriaisimmi :s ;I p f�l sE &Y"l7eelE .' , ' :o r. �' ��CQQaii i•VICP : : ^y� i p wEAGLE Iti9rN mol 4ti'llik aTY OF LFIO LANES .....Capei „tr.. �` ;aw1�11111111111�1111 pnP�oar•� Y� ,...,.....L„..,:__ tt... Aye .._.,.,�.,,.• o� rraw► ►�, r7 n 1/0-3nr. T� C,■ • 02ravi a F1 . MC. WINILT 41111111.A. .a.A111 :L.s AGENDA ITEM 6K STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 2000 -15, Easement Grant to US West Communications in the Apollo Business Park VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4 BACKGROUND: US West is requesting an easement from the City of Lino Lakes over a parcel of property immediately south of Apollo Drive in the Apollo Business Park. The actual easement size will be 20 feet by 20 feet and will contain an equipment enclosure. The easement site has been reviewed the City's Utility Superintendent and he has no objection to granting the easement. The City Attorney has reviewed the easement agreement and he has no objection to the easement language. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Not approve Resolution No. 2000 -15. 3. Approve Resolution No. 2000 -15, approving the easement agreement with US West Communications. RECOMMENDATION: Option 3 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 2000 -15 be approved. • • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -15 RESOLUTION APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH US WEST COMMUNICATIONS FOR AN EASEMENT IN THE APOLLO BUSINESS PARK. WHEREAS, US West Communications has requested an easement and approval of an easement agreement to place facilities within a portion of the Apollo Business Park; and, WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has determined that, based on the expected City use of the property, this easement can be granted, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The easement agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and US West Communications, a copy of which is attached, is hereby approved. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of February, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 14, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk NO. 15 LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER to6tAtte tfOCAoci0 –S AT NK HIGHWAY NO.49 74TH— STREET- STATE -TRUfNK I 2 1 L s o CIA L:N' IN I / 7 8 9 APOLLO BUSINESS PAR NO 2 // ,140 -664 TRACT ' A AUp: z SUB. NO. MARSHAN LAP viii ELM — STREET ZNO IS Or CINNAMON TEAL COURT FARM 2NO ADO. I I/ \ 00c 1/gyL4 3 ()oUcrnber Z3,g9y iooK 1 9ht of way Pale N N N I hereby certify that this is e boundaries as shown and that s all distances are correctly sho for the guidance of future sun after completion of constructic the plat and it was prepared pur Terrance G. Johnson, and Surve! Minnesota Registration No. 1311 This 1� ` day of AJOU Eft IS That portion of Apollo Drive 13c, shown on this plat effected by t plat of that portion of said st,ef : Chapter 505.1793. The fore tin g . of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at a re A.D., CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA BY N J W V CC d Affilc{69?Aottikfi HULT 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS JUNE 1993 • • FJw EASEMENT AGREEMENT The undersigned Grantor(s) for and in consideration of One and no /100 Dollars ($1.00 ) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknoowlledghed, do her byegrenta ad convey unto U S WEST Communications, Inc.; a Colorado corporation, 80120 its "Grantee ", whose address is 700 West Mineral Avenue, Room ease en8, construct, CO C reconstruct, successors, assigns, lessees, licensees and agents a perpe modify, change, add to, operate, maintain and remove such telecommunications facilities, electrical facilities and gas facilities, and appurtenances, from time to time, as Grantee may require upon, over, under and across the following described land situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, which the Grantor owns or in which the Grantor has any interest, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Grantor further conveys to Grantee the following incidental rights: (1) A temporary right -of -way to be used during all periods of construction, reconstruction, reinforcement, repair and removal upon a strip of land 5_00 feet wide on the North side of, and a strip of land 5.00 feet wide on the East side of said easement. (2) The right of ingress and egress over and across the lands of Grantor to and from the above - described property and the right to clear and keep cleared all trees and other obstructions as may be necessary for the Grantee's use and enjoyment of the easement area. Grantee shall indemnify Grantor for. all damage caused to Grantor as a result of Grantee's negligent exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. Grantee shall have no responsibility for pre- existing environmental contamination or liabilities. Grantor reserves the right to occupy, use and cultivate said easement for all purposes not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. Grantor covenants that he/she/they is /are the fee simple owner of said land or in which the Grantor has any interest and will warrant and defend title to then land against all claims. Grantor hereby covenants that no excavation, building, structure or obstruction g constructed, erected, built or permitted on said easement area and no change will be made by ^ grading in or otherwise to the surface or subsurface of the easement area or to the grc: d'' in' a iately adjacent to the easement area. The rights, conditions and provisions of this easement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. 0 Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be conducted in the county where the property is located. • Dated this day of , 1999. This instrument was drafted by: Grantor (s) North Star Land Services Company The City of Lino Lakes 2277 West Hwy. 36, Suite 306E St. Paul, MN 55113 By: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Its: CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1999 by the , of The City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public R/W# Job # 91MM927 Exchange Blaine County Anoka 1/4 Section NW Section 17 Township 31 Range 22 • EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (Abstract Property) All that part of Lot 17, Block 2, Lino Industrial Park, lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Lot 17; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the West line of said Lot 17 a distance of 145.16 feet to the most Southerly corner of The City of Lino Lakes right of way plat No. 2, Anoka County, Minnesota and the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly 265.43 feet along a non tangential curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 710.00 feet and a central angle of 21 degrees 25 minutes 11 seconds, and a chord that bears North 48 degrees 13 minutes 26 seconds East; thence South 55 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds East to the Southeasterly line of said Lot 17 and said line there terminating. 10 EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: Except for the right of access, Grantee's easement rights shall be limited to a 20.00 foot by 20.00 foot parcel located adjacent to the Southeasterly right of way line of Apollo Drive, the exact location to be determined by survey. • • • • William G. Hawkins and Associates Memo To: John Powell From: Bill Haw, kinc Date: January 5, 2000 Re: US West Communications Easement Dear John: I have reviewed the proposed easement agreement sent by US West Communications for a permanent easement over a part of the property that the City owns in the former Lino Industrial Park. The area over which they wanted an easement was not included in the re -plat of this area and really has little or no value to the City. I have attempted to obtain a deed from the Schilling but have not had a response to date. This area was included in the original contract for deed under which we purchased the property, however, since it was re- platted but not included in the new plat, it was not included in the warrant deed from the Schillings to the City. Nevertheless, I have no problem with the language in the easement. If you feel the City will have no use for this area in the future, I have no problem with the City Council approving the agreement. If you have any questions, please contact me. Bill cc: Tim Hillisheim AGENDA ITEM 6L STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 2000 -16, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Twilight Acres Utility Improvements (Vicky Lane) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4 BACKGROUND: The Lake Drive Trunk Utility project, constructed in 1999, extended City sanitary sewer and water service to the edge of this subdivision. In response to a petition received from the neighborhood, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report on the project. This report was received on October 11, 1999. A public hearing to discuss the project was held on November 22, 1999. A copy of the minutes from the hearing are attached. Based on the number of petitioners, and per the City Charter, 60 days must elapse between the hearing and any further action on the project. This requirement has now been met. Since the hearing, the property owner at 789 Vicky Lane has petitioned out of the project. The next step in the public improvement process is to order the preparation of the plans and specifications. On this particular project, where an appeal of the assessment amount is likely, we recommend that the City Council hold the assessment hearing prior to awarding a contract for the improvements. Appraisals will be necessary to verify the benefit received by the properties is equal to, or amount will be primarily based on the bids received for the work. The appraisals and the plans and specifications would be prepared concurrently. A detailed schedule is as follows: Order Plans and Specifications February 14, 2000 Receive Plans and Specifications, Order the Improvement, Declare the Intent to Bond Open Bids, Receive Appraisals Assessment Hearing Contract Execution, Contractor Begins Construction Construction Complete March 27, 2000 April 21, 2000 April 24, 2000 June 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 The above schedule allows for the assessment appeal time to elapse between the assessment hearing and the execution of the contract and start of construction. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -16 ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the Twilight Acres Utility Improvement project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -16 ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the Twilight Acres Utility Improvement project. • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -16 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - TWILIGHT ACRES UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of October, 1999, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement for Twilight Acres (Vicky Lane) by constructing sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer. WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the November 22, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 2. The engineer is also directed to assist the City Attorney to obtain appraisals of certain properties in the proposed project area. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of February, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 14, 2000. 4111 Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk srr No 50 ria 'i aloe ro imam al MEW f ii30 �00�0 ' uIB® mu op EE_ sua alt aumem nmuui iiiiiistihIcavvirrarizal: q RM GEORGE WATC 11-131:241.'42 ►ate.. :;vr -4rcn ui =a iccrmaLGG :G TE!"11m;:;; soandCam j°o" o�wyII: mulairm z 1 I/ 1,[4.1 January 10, 2000 City of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1122 Dear Sir or Madam: We wish to inform the City of Lino Lakes that we do not think that we can afford the water and sewer assessments that are proposed for the project on Vicky Lane. Please remove our property at 789 Vicky Lane from the list of assessable properties. 0f"-----._ Richard Paulsen Nancy Paulsen • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 installation is only 25% of the assessment costs. The City could investigate the possibility of completing the project without storm sewer. Staff noted the City does prefer to install the storm sewer as proposed. Mr. Peterson stated his assessment charge include $4,000 to run the sewer pipe in his yard twice. He indicated that his assessment, therefore, ran $300 per foot. He indicated the sewer pipe should not have to be run twice. He stated he could perform the installation at half the price. Unit costs are based on bids within the City. Ms. Cindy Bruneberg, 7941 Nancy Drive, asked the City to clarify that the residents specific to Twilight 2nd Addition can upgrade their existing septic system. Staff advised residents initiated this project. A septic designer would have to determine if each individual lot could support a system upgrade. Mr. Ray Johnson, 7971 Nancy Drive, asked why the neighborhood has to have curbs and sewer. He stated the area has done without it for a long time. Mayor Sullivan noted certain road standards are established so the constructed throughout the City. The City will have to dete acceptable. Mr. Johnson asked why the residents along Lake advised the lots along Lake Drive qualified for th pertains to lots that can't be subdivided Mr. Johnson asked for a copy of City's public improvement po, ality roads are in quality is to hook up for $8,800. Staff en ment. The Bisel Amendment pay only a small lot assessment. ent and a copy of the ordinance relating to the Council Member D close the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Council Member Bergeson seconded th = . .,� . otion carried unanimously. Council advised residen have 60 days to petition against the project. Council will discuss the project at the end of the 60 days. Staff noted the public hearing is the starting point for the improvements. The Bisel Amendment applies to sewer and water only. The road improvements are not covered under the Bisel Amendment. PUBLIC HEARING, Vicky Lane Utility Extension, John Powell — Staff advised on October Xlib 11, 1999, Council received a Feasibility Report, and set the public hearing, for the installation of sanitary sewer and watermain service to the Nancy Drive/Vicky Lane neighborhood. This report had been prepared in response to two (2) petitions received from Nancy Drive, and Vicky Lane, area property owners. • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Per the Council's direction, this project has been split into two (2) separate projects. One project will serve Twilight Acres (generally Vicky Lane) and the other will serve Twilight Acres 2nd Addition (Nancy Drive, south of Vicky Lane). The original study and the construction cost and assessment impact of splitting the project will be discussed at the public hearing. The improvements discussed at this hearing are those affecting the Twilight Acres Addition (generally Vicky Lane) properties. Staff distributed a copy of the utility plans and a copy of the estimated costs and reviewed them in detail. The approximate assessment cost to each lot for the Vicky Lane Utility Improvements is $17,700, which does not include SAC charges, permit fees, and installation of as meter. Staff noted that if the appraisal does not cover the assessment charge, the City would have to find an alternate- funding source to cover the difference to move forward with the project. Council Member Lyden asked staff to explain the addition of 30% to the assessment fee. Staff advised the City typically adds 30% to the estimated construction cost to determine the project engineering and of needed and costs. Ten percent (10 %) covers a contingency for construction and 2 administration fees. If the project runs smoothly and is on time, won't be added to the assessment fee. Council Member Lyden advised it is the intent of Coun the appraisal does not at least match the assessme request to Council could be made to order the 1 owners would not have the final cost of as project. orward with a project that wised that after 60 days, a cations and appraisals. The property er the bids are received on the Mayor Sullivan opened the p at ']! 56 p.m. Mr. Mike Adamczak, He also asked if feder does not include hook funding is available due e, asked if the assessment fee includes hook up to the house. available for the project. Staff advised the assessment fee bing costs will vary. Staff advised it is unlikely any federal the size of the lots. Council directed staff to investigate the possibility of any federal funds or grants. Ms. Joan Delrio, 785 Vicky Lane, asked if the projects include curbing and who is responsible for the appraisal cost. Staff advised the project does include curbing. The City pays for the appraisal cost for the project. If the property owner desires an additional appraisal, it is the property owners cost. Ms. Delrio asked if there is anything available for those who have had their septic fail and have to do something about sewer. Staff advised an evaluation would have to be made if systems have failed. If many have failed it would be an emergency situation and the project would become more important. 8 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Council directed residents who have a failed septic system to contact City staff if the project does not move forward. State loans may be available and there are other septic options. Council Member Lyden suggested the possibility of putting the project on a ballot per the Charter. Staff advised the City is in the early stages of determining road reconstruction projects. This project is not a high priority at this time but would be if the area properties experienced system failure. However, there are roads within the City that are higher priorities but don't have the support for City utilities. Mr. Ray Johnson, 7971 Nancy Drive, asked why the two (2) lots off of Lake Drive were eliminated from the assessments. Staff advised those (2) lots qualified for the Bisel Amendment. Mr. Johnson asked why the pipes were extended on those lots. Staff advised the City routinely extends pipe out of heavily traveled areas to minimize traffic disturbance. Mr. Johnson asked if the additional 30% are included in the final assessment fee. Staff advised the 30% are included. Staff noted all property owners must pay a true] even if they qualify for the Bisel Amendment. Council advised this was a citizen - initiated project. The ci ; s ed an evaluation of costs. The citizens can also ask to stop the project. Each resid to petition. Mr. Liljedahl asked if there are different options complies with the County's ordinance re other alternatives. Council Member Lyden aske per the City Charter. The on local improvemen have the right to dete ystems. Staff advised that the City ems and staff noted there might be entsLould move forward with this project with a ballot rndvised the Charter does not allow use of general funds way to go through the Charter is with a ballot. Citizens do not s are used. Mayor Sullivan added City does have funds to fix potholes. The City must go to the voters when reconstructing a road. Ms. Delrio asked what would happen after the 60 days if the city did not receive any petitions. Staff advised that if no petitions were received, a poll would be taken relating to moving forward with the project. An assessment hearing will be held for all residents to appeal. After 30 days the Council will determine if the City will proceed. Staff noted appraisals are ordered at the end of the 60-day period. Mr. Chris Hofsted, 774 Vicky Lane, asked why the City couldn't look at cutting costs on the project now. Mayor Sullivan advised the City would look at all options. Feedback is needed from residents. The City will make a determination after the appraisals are received. 9 • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Mr. Lyle Bye, 775 Vicky Lane, stated because there is distrust with government and City officials, some residents are hiding the fact that their septic has already failed. He stated his septic system failed five (5) years ago but he has been able to keep it going safely. He asked if there are any options for already failed septic systems. Council directed staff to investigate options for those whose septic systems have already failed. Council Member Dahl moved to close the pubic hearing at 8:21 p.m. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consider Approval of Final Plat, Pheasant Hills Preserve 10th Addition, Mary Kay Wyland — Staff advised Mr. Vaughan is requesting final plat approval on his Pheasant Hills Preserve 10th Addition. The property is zoned R -1X, and is within the existing MUSA. The 10th Addition will add 17 lots to the City's inventory. The City Attorney has approved the title commitment. Grading and u ' 'eJ1► ` is in progress. The development agreement and financial guarantees are posted w' For Council information, Mr. Vaughan has created Outlot B y ' .osed as Lot 1, Block 1, to get around a title problem with the homeowners' a n. elimination of this lot • does not affect the integrity of the plat nor does it platting of this Outlot if it is combined with Outlot E of Pheasant Hills 5th Ad ; on ' ediately to the south. Council Member Neal moved to appr or ' heasant Hills Preserve 10`h Addition, as presented. Council Member Berg o d e motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of August 21,1996, Council Work Session Minutes (Council Member Dahl and Mayor Sullivan were not on the Council) — Council Member Neal moved to approve the August 21, 1996, Council Work Session minutes, as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Dahl and Mayor Sullivan abstaining. Consideration of September 4,1996, Council Work Session Minutes (Council Member Dahl and Mayor Sullivan were not on the Council) — Council Member Lyden moved to approve the September 4, 1996, Council Work Session minutes, as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Dahl and Mayor Sullivan abstaining. 10 AGENDA ITEM 6M • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer • COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 14, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 2000 -17, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Twilight Acres 2nd Addition Utility Improvements (Nancy Drive) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4 BACKGROUND: The Lake Drive Trunk Utility project, constructed in 1999, extended City sanitary sewer and water service to the edge of this subdivision. In response to a petition received from the neighborhood, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report on the project. This report was received on October 11, 1999. A public hearing to discuss the project was held on November 22, 1999. A copy of the minutes from the hearing are attached. Based on the number of petitioners, and per the City Charter, 60 days must elapse between the hearing and any further action on the project. This requirement has now been met. Surprisingly, City records indicate no petitions against the project have been received. As the estimated assessment to each property is about $28,000, City staff expected negative petitions. The next step in the public improvement process is to order the preparation of the plans and specifications. On this particular project, where an appeal of the assessment amount is likely, we recommend that the City Council hold the assessment hearing prior to awarding a contract for the improvements. Appraisals will be necessary to verify the benefit received by the properties is equal to, or amount will be primarily based on the bids received for the work. The appraisals and the plans and specifications would be prepared concurrently. A detailed schedule is as follows: Order Plans and Specifications February 14, 2000 Receive Plans and Specifications, Order the Improvement, Declare the Intent to Bond Open Bids, Receive Appraisals Assessment Hearing Contract Execution, Contractor Begins Construction Construction Complete March 27, 2000 April 21, 2000 April 24, 2000 June 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 The above schedule allows for the assessment appeal time to elapse between the assessment hearing and the execution of the contract and start of construction. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -17 ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the Twilight Acres 2"d Addition Utility Improvement project. 3. Deny the resolution and terminate the project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -17 ordering preparation of plans and specifications for the Twilight Acres 2"d Addition Utility Improvement project. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -17 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - TWILIGHT ACRES 2ND ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of October, 1999, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement for Twilight Acres 2nd Addition (Nancy Drive) by constructing sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer. WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the November 22, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 2. The engineer is also directed to assist the City Attorney to obtain appraisals of • certain properties in the proposed project area. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of February, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 14, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk 114 ® i 12111 Aultbisige I ffa rwiDINV wm04 Nam o po;p LaTim o ° i : ®O® o w °it*1r'lP�' 'O ©Qi'Fi3�a0 ��■■uN ,,•,,_,0„_„0- e PA ''''Fatrze mom tip: ®� -q� LINO LAKES . J51�� . ■BILITATO CENTER GEORGE G"- WATCH LAKE �oo� v! MARSHAN LAKE NOINI • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Council asked if the drainage problems on the back lot have been taken care of. Staff advised the ditch along the back lots have been realigned. The developer will be cleaning the ditch along the north side so drainage will occur to the east. All neighborhood concerns have been addressed. The City does have an easement on the east side of the plat where the ditch is located. Staff added that the trail is scheduled be graded this fall. Paving will occur when the second layer of asphalt is put on the road. It is anticipated that will happen next spring. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve final plat for Peregrine Pass based on the following conditions: 1. Trail dedication has been added to the plat. 2. Completion of title work subject to City Attorney approval. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Lyden moved to approve the allocation of 5.9 ac Reserve. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried PUBLIC HEARING, FIRST READING, Ordinance Brook Peninsula, John Powell (4/5 Vote Requir continued to the December 13, 1999, Council m ement Vacation, Oak mmended the public hearing be The City Attorney advised there is no t re ating to easement vacations. Council Member Dahl move No. 17 — 99, Easement Vac meeting. Council Me C HEARING, FIRST READING, Ordinance ook Peninsula, to the December 13, 1999, City Council econded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING, , `' c rive Utility Extension, John Powell — Staff advised on October 11, 1999, Council recei • a Feasibility Report, and set the public hearing, for the installation of sanitary sewer and watermain service to the Nancy Drive/Vicky Lane neighborhood. This report had been prepared in response to two (2) petitions received from Nancy Drive, and Vicky Lane, area property owners. Per the Council direction, this project has been split into two (2) separate projects. One Project will serve Twilight Acres (generally Vicky Lane) and the other will serve Twilight Acres 2°1 Addition (Nancy Drive, south of Vicky Lane) The original study and the construction cost and assessment impact of splitting the project will be discussed at the public hearing. The improvements discussed at this hearing are those affecting the Twilight Acres 2K1 Addition (Nancy Drive, south of Vicky Lane) properties. 5 • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Staff distributed a copy of the utility plans and a copy of the estimated costs and reviewed them in detail. The approximate assessment cost to each lot for the Nancy Drive Utility Improvements is $28,000, which does not include SAC charges, permit fees, and installation of a meter. Staff also noted that the project was initiated by residents in the area because of the utilities that were installed along Lake Drive. If the appraisal does not cover the cost of the assessment for each lot, the City will have to find alternative funding to move forward with this project. The residents in the area can determine whether the project should proceed. Council Member Neal asked if it is possible to only install sewer. He stated that water is not a problem in the area and the road is still in good shape. If a water pipe was installed, residents could hook up to the water service when they see fit. Staff advised they would not recommend installing sewer only. Part of the roadway would still have to be removed. Therefore, a street restoration cost would still be added to the assessment charges. Council Member Lyden asked about the final figure, which is different from the lateral benefit figure. Staff advised trunk assessments, unit and area assessment, and system wide improvement costs are added to the lateral benefit figure. Mayor Sullivan noted the assessment charges are very high du onstruction costs. Mayor Sullivan opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. Mr. Richard Kelly, 7951 Nancy Drive, asked if come in at a lower figure than the assess forward with the project, another fun have to cover the costs or reduce t as leaving out curb and gutter they path to take if the appraisals ed if the City chooses to move u have to be identified. The City would pr•ject further. There are options to look at such Mr. Kelly asked at w •oin City would determine the project should be dropped. Staff advised that the Coun . e that decision based on petitions received from property owners. Mr. Richard Urbis, 7940 Nancy Drive, stated he is concerned that the project will cost even more for the few residents that want the project to go forward. Ms. Janelle Wouness, 719 Vicky Lane, asked why the City couldn't identify an altemate- funding source before the appraisals are ordered. Staff advised they are unaware of any other funding source that is available. Staff may not be comfortable with any other variation of the project. Staff noted the assessment cost is based on construction costs. Mayor Sullivan advised that the City does not typically pay 100% of road improvements. There is an assessment process that has to be followed. Mr. Keith Peterson, 761 Vicky Lane, stated he has never had a problem with drainage. He asked if the project could be completed without storm sewers. Staff advised the storm sewer 6 • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1999 installation is only 25% of the assessment costs. The City could investigate the possibility of completing the project without storm sewer. Staff noted the City does prefer to install the storm sewer as proposed. Mr. Peterson stated his assessment charge include $4,000 to run the sewer pipe in his yard twice. He indicated that his assessment, therefore, ran $300 per foot. He indicated the sewer pipe should not have to be run twice. He stated he could perform the installation at half the price. Unit costs are based on bids within the City. Ms. Cindy Bruneberg, 7941 Nancy Drive, asked the City to clarify that the residents specific to Twilight 2nd Addition can upgrade their existing septic system. Staff advised residents initiated this project. A septic designer would have to determine if each individual lot could support a system upgrade. Mr. Ray Johnson, 7971 Nancy Drive, asked why the neighborhood has to have curbs and sewer. He stated the area has done without it for a long time. Mayor Sullivan noted certain road standards are established so the constructed throughout the City. The City will have to dete acceptable. ality roads are in quality is Mr. Johnson asked why the residents along Lake r to hook up for $8,800. Staff advised the lots along Lake Drive qualified for th en • ment. The Bisel Amendment pertains to lots that can't be subdivided . pay only a small lot assessment. Mr. Johnson asked for a copy of City's public improvement po, ent and a copy of the ordinance relating to the Council Member D . :. ve close the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. Council Member Bergeson seconded th otion carried unanimously. Council advised residen have 60 days to petition against the project. Council will discuss the project at the end of the 60 days. Staff noted the public hearing is the starting point for the improvements. The Bisel Amendment applies to sewer and water only. The road improvements are not covered under the Bisel Amendment. PUBLIC HEARING, Vicky Lane Utility Extension, John Powell — Staff advised on October 11, 1999, Council received a Feasibility Report, and set the public hearing, for the installation of sanitary sewer and watermain service to the Nancy Drive/Vicky Lane neighborhood. This report had been prepared in response to two (2) petitions received from Nancy Drive, and Vicky Lane, area property owners. 7