HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/13/2000 Council Packet•
•
•
AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
(revised)
Monday
March 13, 2000
6:30 P.M.
Call to Order and Roll Call :
Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda?
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Minutes
i) February 9, 2000 Council Work Session Minutes
ii) February 14, 2000 City Council Meeting Minutes
iii) February 15, 2000 Special Meeting Minutes
iv) February 23, 2000 Council Work Session Minutes
B) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) February manuals $508,559.74.
ii) 1999/ 2000 (Check No. 58351 - 58440 in the amount of
$130,176.42 and $204,043.18 respectively)
iii) Centennial Fire District
C) Approve Resolution 00 -28 — Re- designating Community Development
Block Grant for the City of Lino Lakes for Funding year 2000 -2001
D) Approve Resolution 00 -31 - Supporting Continuation of Metropolitan Bus
Routes 271 and 213 in Lino Lakes
E) Open Mike
2. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Consider Resolution 00 -24 Cable Franchise Extension (3/4 Vote
Required) — Dan Tesch
B) Consider Computer/Internet Use Policy (3/4 Vote Required) — Dan Tesch
Page 1
•
•
•
AGENDA
C—� Authorize Hiring Finance Director (3/4 Vote Required) — Dan Tesch
D) Adopt Lino Lakes Service Award Program (3/4 Vote Required) — Dan
Tesch
3. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
4. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A. Consideration of Mutual Aid Agreement with the Cities of Hugo and
Centerville (3/4 Vote Required) - Rick DeGardner
B. Consideration of Receiving Bids and Awarding Playground Equipment,
Brandywood Park (3/4 Vote Required) - Rick DeGardner
C. Consideration of Resolution 00 -25 - Accepting Lino Lakes Lions Club
Donation for Kite Day (3/4 Vote Required) - Rick DeGardner
D. Consideration of Resolution 00 -26 - Accept Donations for Scoreboards at
Sunrise Park (3/4 Vote Required) - Rick DeGardner
5. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel
A. Consider Resolution 00 -30 Supporting DNR Collaboration "Integrating
Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban
Interface Communities "(3 /4 Vote Required) — Marty Asleson
B. First Reading, Ordinance 04 -00 offering the sale of property in the Apollo
Business Park to Nol -Tec Systems, Inc. (3/4 Vote Required)— Mary Alice
Divine
C. Pheasant Hills 11th Addition Final Plat (3/4 Vote Required) - Mary Kay
Wyland
D. Highland Meadows Site Plan (3/4 Vote Required) - Jeff Smyser /Cindy
Sherman
E. Consider Resolution 00 -29 Findings of fact for Majestic Pines Church (3/4
Vote Required) — Jeff Smyser
F. Resolution 00 -32 - Lakes Addition Street Reconstruction Final Payment
(3/4 Vote Required) — John Powell
G. Resolution 00 -33 — Deny Bluebill Ponds Area Petition (3/4 Vote
Required) — John Powell
Page 2
AGENDA
H. Consider Joint Powers Agreement to Provide Water Service to Hugo
Wenzel Farms (3/4 Vote Required) — John Powell
7. Unfinished Business
8. New Business
9. Community Calendar, March 13, 2000 through March 27, 2000:
A. TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000, SPECIAL CITY ELECTION
B. Wednesday, March 15, 2000, St. Patrick's Day Lunch at Senior Center,
noon
C. Monday, March 20, 2000, 7:00 p.m., CAG meeting
D. Tuesday, March 21, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Special Work Session to Discuss
Draft Comprehensive Plan
E. Wednesday, March 22, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session Meeting
F. Monday, March 27, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Mtg.
10 Adjourn
Revised 3/08/2000 7:58 a.m.
•
Page 3
•
EXPENDITURES
MARCH 13, 2000
1999 BUDGET
•
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:53 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 726 - 726
Bank #: (A)
Cash #: (A)
Payroll Check Dates: (A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
O IVY RIDGE HOME BUILDER REIMBURSE UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * **
O MARKLAND, HAL REIMBURSE UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * **
O NOLAND, PERRY REIMBURSE UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * **
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING * * * * * * **
0 SWIFT CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSE UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * **
Total for Dept **
41.12
15.73
12.66
341.03
10.59
421.13*
0 SMITH, PEG MILEAGE SENIORS 72.54
Total for Dept 406 72.54*
0 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, TRANSPORTATION PLAN PLANNING 247.70
Total for Dept 416 247.70*
III/10 CENTURY COLLEGE
O ZERWAS, JEROME
•
ENROLLMENT /M BROWN POLICE 96.00
REIMBURSE HEALTH INSURAN POLICE 200.00
Total for Dept 420 296.00*
O KIEGER ENTERPRISES, IN EXCAVATOR /GRAPPLE /CUTTER STORM #2 5,808.75
Total for Dept 434 5,808.75*
0 LITTLE TIKES COMM PLAY PLASTIC CAP /PANEL PARKS 154.52
Total for Dept 450 154.52*
O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, WATER METERS WATER 11,286.63
Total for Dept 494 11,286.63*
O DRESSEL CONTRACTING, I CONTRACTOR /LAKES ADDITIO OTHER 91,212.46
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING OTHER 136.13
O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK LAKE DRIVE TRUNK OTHER 20,540.56
Total for Dept 499 111,889.15*
Grand Total 130,176.42*
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:10:31 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 724 - 724
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000209 MARKLAND, HAL 1 15.73 15.73 .00 .00
000211 NOLAND, PERRY 1 12.66 12.66 .00 .00
000212 ZERWAS, JEROME 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00
001067 CENTURY COLLEGE 1 96.00 96.00 .00 .00
001952 IVY RIDGE HOME BUILDERS 1 41.12 41.12 .00 .00
001965 LITTLE TIKES COMM PLAY SYSTEMS, INC 1 154.52 154.52 .00 .00
002142 KIEGER ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 5,808.75 5,808.75 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 477.16 477.16 .00 .00
003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 2 20,540.56 20,540.56 .00 .00
004040 SMITH, PEG 1 72.54 72.54 .00 .00
1119 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1 247.70 247.70 .00 .00
1 SWIFT CONSTRUCTION 1 10.59 10.59 .00
004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 11,286.63 11,286.63 .00
900632 DRESSEL CONTRACTING, INC. 1 91,212.46 91,212.46 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 16 130,176.42 130,176.42 .00 .00*
EXPENDITURES
MARCH 13, 2000
2000 BUDGET
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:01 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 725 725
Bank #: (A)
Cash #: (A)
Payroll Check Dates: (A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. TOW FORFEITURE CARS /5 * * * * * * ** 1,250.00
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 804.15
O KOLSTAD, ROGER REIMBURSE ESCROW /LINO AI * * * * * * ** 756.00
0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 4,220.81
O NELSON, ALICE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 22.00
O NEWSTROM, STEPHANIE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 62.00
0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 187.52
O WERDEY, CATHY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 54.00
Total for Dept ** 7,356.48*
O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SUPPLIES ADULT SP 2,256.93
Total for Dept 202 2,256.93*
O BLAINE, CITY OF PROGRAM REC SPECIAL 101.33
•0 BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /CINEMA CAFE SPECIAL 200.00
0 FIRST STUDENT, INC. PROGRAM REC TRANSPORTATI SPECIAL 550.00
O MINNESOTA ZOO PROGRAM REC SPECIAL 78.00
O TROLLHAUGEN, INC. PROGRAM REC SPECIAL 641.00
Total for Dept 205 1,570.33*
O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 619.24
O CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS DAMAGE CHARGES YOUTH IN 22.00
O JII SALES PROMOTION AS STRESS BALLS YOUTH IN 195.23
Total for Dept 207 836.47*
O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SUPPLIES YOUTH SP 191.88
O JII SALES PROMOTION AS STRESS BALLS YOUTH SP 195.23
Total for Dept 208 387.11*
O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC FEB 23 MAYOR /CO 478.75
Total for Dept 401 478.75*
O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ADMINIST 27.55
O BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LEGAL SERVICES ADMINIST 192.00
O CITIZENS LEAGUE DIRECTORY ADMINIST 21.50
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 77.01
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:01 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 2
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
O FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO REGISTRATION /7 ADMINIST 80.00
O GAUSTAD, RY -CHEL MILEAGE ADMINIST 12.60
O INTERNATIONAL PERSONNE MEMBERSHIP /D TESCH ADMINIST 226.00
0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 1,283.96
0 METROPOLITAN AREA LUNCHEON MEETING /LINDA W ADMINIST 16.00
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST 17.50
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY ADMINIST 61.45
O WYLAND, CATHY SPRING NEWSLETTER ADMINIST 165.00
Total for Dept 402 2,180.57*
0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE SENIORS 29.79
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SENIORS 12.03
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY SENIORS 4.49
Total for Dept 406 46.31*
0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 2,544.45
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE 3.50
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY FINANCE 13.74
Total for Dept 407 2,561.69*
0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ECONOMIC 27.55
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 193.95
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING ECONOMIC 66.00
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC 7.00
Total for Dept 415 294.50*
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING 77.00
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE PLANNING 193.95
S0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE PLANNING 7.00
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY PLANNING 22.39
Total for Dept 416 300.34*
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY ENGINEER 1.44
Total for Dept 417 1.44*
O AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT RENTAL POLICE 48.64
O ARROWWOOD /RADISON RESO LODGING /M BROWN POLICE 230.04
O BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L REGISTRATION /K RAUSCH POLICE 200.00
O CHIEF SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES POLICE 69.45
O CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CAR WASHES POLICE 136.32
O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE 10.65
O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 433.45
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE 115.55
O EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPP CLEAR STROBES POLICE 199.88
O FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO REGISTRATION /7 POLICE 120.00
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES POLICE 29.12
O I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, EMBLEMS POLICE 286.06
O KMJ COMMUNICATIONS SWITCH /CABLE POLICE 1,291.98
O L B GRAPHIC DESIGN, IN POLOS /49 POLICE 1,288.00
O LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN PRINTING SERVICE POLICE 259.33
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:02 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 3
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
•
•
Description
Dept
Amount
O MEDICA
O MENARDS, INC.
0 METRO SALES INCORPORAT
0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
0 P -4, INC.
O PETTY CASH
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE
0 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR
0 US WEST
0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.
MEDICAL INSURANCE
SUPPLIES
COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREE
MONTHLY SERVICE
SUPPLIES
MILEAGE /OFFICE SUPPLIES/
ADVERTISING
LIFE INSURANCE
SUPPLIES
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MONTHLY SERVICE
BIKE RACK /SIGN SUPPLIES/
Total for Dept 420
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE
0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY
Total for Dept 421
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO
O MEDICA
b PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE
O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS,
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR
O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI
O CONNEXUS ENERGY
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
O H & L MESABI, INC.
O MEDICA
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
0 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS,
O NORTHERN STATES POWER,
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR
O WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.
DENTAL INSURANCE
REGISTRATION /7
MEDICAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
LONG TERM DISABILITY
Total for Dept 422
MONTHLY SERVICE
MONTHLY SERVICE
DENTAL INSURANCE
PARTS /SUPPLIES
SNOW PLOW NOSE PIECE
MEDICAL INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE
SIGNS
MONTHLY SERVICE
LIFE INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
BIKE RACK /SIGN SUPPLIES/ STREETS
Total for Dept 430
O BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
O CAPITOL CITY WELDING,
O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
O GOPHER BEARING COMPANY
0 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
O LEEF BROTHER, INC.
O LITTLE FALLS MACHINE,
TANK ASSEMBLY /STRAP /INSU FLEET
CHEMICALS
PARTS
PARTS /SUPPLIES
PARTS FOR SNOW
SCALE FEE
SHOP TOWELS
SPRING TRIP
BLOWER
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
7,174.16
242.02
395.32
29.08
106.03
187.09
77.00
84.00
141.34
241.27
116.95
74.08
13,586.81*
31.29
702.51
3.50
26.22
763.52*
38.50
40.00
583.96
10.50
1,029.11
31.37
1,733.44*
33.19
395.99
77.01
99.11
976.55
581.85
8.84
180.61
2,681.99
17.50
46.58
6.07
5,105.29*
540.25
42.57
142.10
47.52
24.73
5.00
11.64
270.47
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:03 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 4
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept
Amount
O MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SE PRINTER PAPER FLEET
O NTH, INC. SHAFT SPLINED FLEET
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FLEET
0 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL TOOLS FLEET
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY FLEET
O WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. BIKE RACK /SIGN SUPPLIES/ FLEET
Total for Dept 431
O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE
O AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT RENTAL
O CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE
O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE
O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC CHAIR
O DALCO, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
O DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI JANITORIAL SERVICE
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES
O HARRISON EQUIPMENT COM HANDTRUCK
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE
O PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY
O US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE
Total for Dept 432
0
0
0
• 0
•
A T & T WIRELESS SERVI
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
MEDICA
MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.
MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNC
NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES,
PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS
MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS
TONER CARTRIDGE PARKS
DENTAL INSURANCE PARKS
REGISTRATION /MIKE H, BAR PARKS
MEDICAL INSURANCE PARKS
MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS
MEMBERSHIP /RICK D PARKS
PARK SHELTERS PARKS
LIFE INSURANCE PARKS
UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY PARKS
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT REGISTRATION /DAVE L,STEV PARKS
US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS
Total for Dept 450
0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE
O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SUPPLIES
O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /CINEMA CAFE
O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC TONER CARTRIDGE
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO REGISTRATION /7
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY
Total for Dept 451
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
34.28
66.60
3.50
18.29
9.59
9.82
1,226.36*
274.70
45.95
3,560.07
1,006.62
271.96
498.92
678.86
35.15
150.74
400.01
397.65
3.50
8.04
1,960.03
9,292.20*
62.07
277.23
44.42
115.55
40.00
1,580.04
8.84
205.00
686.00
24.50
58.69
300.00
112.69
3,515.03*
34.42
155.94
57.53
44.42
19.25
40.00
193.95
8.84
7.00
21.74
583.09*
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:18:03 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 5
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
•
•
O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 27.55
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 175.00
0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 4.42
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM 1.57
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY ENVIRONM 6.47
Total for Dept 461 215.01*
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA .35
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY SOLID WA 27.44
Total for Dept 462 27.79*
0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FORESTRY 175.01
0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY 1.58
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY FORESTRY 6.48
Total for Dept 463 183.07*
O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 102.37
O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 743.96
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE WATER 17.32
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER 27.52
O LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER 525.00
0 LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN PRINTING SERVICE WATER 125.56
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE WATER 96.98
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 4.42
O MN. DEPT OF HEALTH REGISTRATION /TIM P, LES WATER 200.00
O NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 284.79
O PACE ANALYTICAL, INC. MONITOR WELL DATA WATER 63.00
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE WATER 5.25
O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, WATER METER PARTS WATER 12,908.93
0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY WATER 15.95
O US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 59.72
0 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. WRENCH /CUTTER /CADDY /CABL WATER 121.87
Total for Dept 494 15,302.64*
O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 192.15
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER 17.34
O LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER 525.00
O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SEWER 96.97
O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 4.42
O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 5.25
O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY SEWER 15.29
Total for Dept 495 856.42*
O ARNT CONSTRUCTION CONATRACTOR /OTTER LAKE R OTHER
Total for Dept 499
133,381.59
133,381.59*
Grand Total 204,043.18*
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:10:05 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 723 723
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000046 ARROWWOOD /RADISON RESORT 1 230.04 230.04 .00 .00
000068 GAUSTAD, RY -CHEL 1 12.60 12.60 .00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 2 274.70 274.70 .00 .00
000106 US WEST 2 2,249.39 2,249.39 .00 .00
000110 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 1 344.49 344.49 .00 .01 --
000112 CHIEF SUPPLY, INC. 1 69.45 69.45 .00 .00.
000118 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 1 18.29 18.29 .00 .00
000125 MINNESOTA ZOO 1 78.00 78.00 .00 .00
000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 3,223.99 3,223.99 .00 .00
000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 192.00 192.00 .00 .00
00 163 FIRST STUDENT, INC. 2 550.00 550.00 .00 .00
6 HARRISON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 1 150.74 150.74 .00 .00
000197 JII SALES PROMOTION ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 390.46 390.46 .00 .00
000199 KOLSTAD, ROGER 1 756.00 756.00 .00 .00
000202 KMJ COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,291.98 1,291.98 .00 .00
000203 NTH, INC. 1 66.60 66.60 .00 .00
000204 NEWSTROM, STEPHANIE 1 62.00 62.00 .00 .00
000205 NELSON, ALICE 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00
000206 P -4, INC. 1 106.03 106.03 .00 .00
000208 WERDEY, CATHY 1 54.00 54.00 .00
000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 2 94.59 94.59 .00 .00.
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 101.33 101.33 .00 .00
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:10:06 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount'
# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 1,250.00 1,250.00 .00 .00
000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 540.25 540.25 .00 .00
000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 257.53 257.53 .00
000960 CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 1 42.57 42.57 .00 .00
001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 3,837.30 3,837.30 .00 .00
001127 CITIZENS LEAGUE 1 21.50 21.50 .00 .00
001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 136.32 136.32 .00 .00
001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,349.37 2,349.37 .00 .00
001270 DALCO, INC. 2 498.92 498.92 .00 .00
001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 1,402.00 1,402.00 .00 .00
001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 678.86 678.86 .00 .00
001505 FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO 1 280.00 280.00 .00 .00
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 142.10 142.10 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 238.42 238.42 .00 .00
001660 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 1 24.73 24.73 .00 .00
W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 1 121.87 121.87 .00 .00.,
001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 2 976.55 976.55 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00
001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 286.06 286.06 .00 .00
002003 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 1 226.00 226.00 .00 .00
002248 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & CO., LLP 1 3,594.45 3,594.45 .00 .00
002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00
002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 11.64 11.64 .00 .00
002340 LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 1 384.89 384.89 .00 .00
002440 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. 1 270.47 270.47 .00 .00
002540 MEDICA 1 17,653.11 17,653.11 .00 .00
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:10:07
CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Discount
# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 242.02 242.02 .00 .00
002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 16.00 16.00 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 395.32 395.32 .00 .00
002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 2 68.86 68.86 .00 .00
002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00
002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00
002835 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 1 205.00 205.00 .00 .00
002849 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE, INC. 1 34.28 34.28 .00 .00
003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 180.61 180.61 .00 .00
003193 NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 686.00 686.00 .00 .00.-
003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1 2,966.78 2,966.78 .00 .00
003293 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPPLY, LLC 1 199.88 199.88 .00 .00
003454 PACE ANALYTICAL, INC. 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
003492 PETTY CASH 1 187.09 187.09 .00 .00
003524 PITNEY BOWES 3 397.65 397.65 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 143.00 143.00 .00 .00
PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP 1 390.52 390.52 .00 .00
004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,029.11 1,029.11 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 478.75 478.75 .00 .00
004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 12,908.93 12,908.93 .00 .00
004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 141.34 141.34 .00 .00
004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 618.64 618.64 .00 .00
004610 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00
004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 89.97 89.97 .00 .00
004850 WYLAND, CATHY 1 165.00 165.00 .00 .00 --
900217 ARNT CONSTRUCTION 1 133,381.59 133,381.59 .00 .00
900453 L B GRAPHIC DESIGN, INC. 1 1,288.00 1,288.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 03/07/2000 Time: 08:10:09 CITY OF LINO LAKES
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Discount
Vr# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
900489 TROLLHAUGEN, INC. 1 641.00 641.00
900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 5 794.25 794.25
Grand Totals: 94 204,043.18 204,043.18
•
•
.00
.00
.00
.00
00 .
.00*
•
MONTH END EXPENDITURES
February -2000
CIVIC COMPLEX
CHICAGO TITLE /PAYMENT #18 37,771.54
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SENSIBLE LAND USE /REGISTRATION -M DIVINE 30.00
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
CIRCLE PINES POSTMASTER -2000 PERMIT 100.00
PLANNING
SENSIBLE LAND USE /REGISTRATION -MK WYLAND & J SMYSER 60.00
SURFACE WATER
INDUSTRIAL EQUITIES /LAND PURCHASE 470,296.25
UTILITY
CIRCLE PINES POSTMASTER /POSTAGE 301.95
TOTAL FEBRUARY EXPENDITURES $ 508,559.74
•
•
Centennial Fire District
7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
(651) 784 -7472 - Office
(651) 784 -2427 - Fax
March 2, 2000
TO: City Council
City of Circle Pines
City Council
City of Centerville
City Council
ID City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Milo Bennett
SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for
payment of March expenses.
Your approval of February expenses as listed on the attached copy
of the check register, checks #12076 — 12095, in the amount of
$9,687.18 is hereby requested.
•
•
DATE CHECK# NAME
03/02/2000 12075
03/02/2000 12076
03/02/2000 12077
03/02/2000 12078
03/02/2000 12079
03/02/2000 12080
03/02/2000 12081
03/02/2000 12082
03/02/2000 12083
03/02/2000 12084
03/02/2000 12085
03/02/2000 12086
03/02/2000 12087
03/02/2000 12088
03/02/2000 12089
03/02/2000 12090
03/02/2000 12091
03/02/2000 12092
03/02/2000 12093
03/02/2000 12094
03/02/2000 12095
•
•
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
MN Chapter IAAI /Jeffrey G. Schadegg
AirTouch Cellular
Amoco Oil Company
AT &T Wireless
Bearcom
Best Buy
Circle Pines Utilities
Connexus Energy
Cy's Uniforms
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance
Hennepin Technical College
Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator
IKON Office Solutions
International Assn. of Fire Chiefs
J. Beecher & Associates, Inc.
Lightning Printing
Metro Fire
Milo Bennett
Norm's Tire Sales
Red Rooster Auto Stores
Rolltex Computers
ACCOUNT
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42240 - Telephone
42100 -Fuel and Lube
42240 - Telephone
42130- Equipment
42180 -Office Supplies
42251 - Station 1 Gas
42252 - Station 1 Electric
42120 - Uniforms Expense
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42230 - Cleaning Supplies
42110 -Other Maintenance
42200 -Dues and Memberships
42130 - Equipment
42130 - Equipment
42130 - Equipment
40100 - Logistical
42010 - Utility 11
42110 -Other Maintenance
42180 -Office Supplies
Total
Page 1 of 1
AMOUNT
445.00
193.85
287.77
1.90
1,536.93
80.87
827.49
436.85
155.50
2,356.52
70.00
24.30
143.65
135.00
1,856.73
21.30
469.74
27.38
553.46
38.34
24.60
9,687.18
•
•
•
MARCH 6, 2000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MILO BENNETT
RATIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES AND APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT OF
MARCH PAYROLL EXPENSE.
YOUR APPROVAL OF MARCH PAYROLL EXPENSE AS LISTED ON THE ATTACHED
COPY OF THE CHECK REGISTER, CHECKS #12405 - 12452, IN THE AMOUNT OF
$27,092.00, IS HEREBY REQUESTED.
MB/NW
CC: 7 CIRCLE PINES CITY COUNCIL
7 CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL
7 LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL
2 FILE
Mar 06, 2000 10:25 AM
CHECK# EMP NUN EMPLOYEE NAME
12 1990 ALBERG, JOHN
1240 1980 AMACHER, JEFFREY
12407 1201 BANGERT, RICHARD 1
12408 1203 BARNARD, RICHARD 1
12409 1208 BEHR, SCOTT A
12410 1230 BOGENREIF, KERRY
12411 2857 BOLDT, ROBERT
12412 1260 BROKER, MICHAEL A
12413 3516 BROWN, CLIFFORD L
12414 1265 BRUDER, DAVE
12415 3333 CHAMBERS, JOEL
12416 1340 CHEVALLIER, THIERf
12417 1350 CISEWSKI, JERRY L
12418 1380 COLVARD, BRIAN T
12419 5966 COOPER, DARYL
12420 1390 CRUZ, RAYMOND
12421 1400 DOMITZ, STUART C
12422 1500 ENGLUND, DESMOND $
12423 1600 FRENCH, TOM
12424 1740 GARDNER, TODD
12425 2140 KERFELD, GLENN
12426 2222 LALLIER, DANIEL
12427 2210 LAUDERBAUGH, RAND
12428 2250 -LEE, STEVE
12429 2340 MENCH, MIKE J
124- 2360 MISCHKE, KATHY
124, 5555 MISCHKE, SCOTT
12432 2365 MISCHKE, THOMAS G
12433 2375 MOE, DON
12434 2380 MOHLER, ARTHUR E
12435 8029 NADEAU, SCOTT
12436 2440 NORBERG, DEWAYNE
12437 2550 OLSON, GLEN A
12438 2630 PETERSON, JERRY
12439 2640 PETERSON, MIKE T
12440 2730 REITER, RONALD
12441 2750 ROBERTSON, GORDON
12442 2770 ROLSTAD, RANDY T
12443 2810 SCOTT, JAMES L
12444 2820 SHIKOWSKY, STEVE
12445 2825 STAFKI, ROBERT
12446 0953 STAHNKE, JUSTIN
12447 2830 STARK, MARC
12448 2860 STEWART, KEVIN J
12449 2880 SWEENEY, TERRANCE
12450 2920 TASCHUK, ALLEN S
12451 2940 THELL, PAUL
12452 2945 THELL, TIM
'AYROLL SUMMARY
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
PAYRifl I CIIMDIITt=P rum/ acr_Trrrn
Page 1
GROSS PAY DEDUCTIONS NET PAY
592.50 117.59 474.91
615.81 121.93 493.88
1,403.88 230.00 1,173.88
504.25 102.31 401.94
641.50 125.30 516.20
364.50 79.29 285.21
468.00 97.79 370.21
621.63 122.01 499.62
35.00 26.51 8.49
890.38 166.91 723.47
88.13 35.28 52.85
640.56 125.29 515.27
458.00 89.00 369.00
274.63 64.98 209.65
321.00 72.65 248.35
440.38 92.39 347.99
323.75 72.69 251.06
356.25 74.00 282.25
1,013.75 185.70 828.05
522.38 105.57 416.81
232.00 55.00 177.00
511.25 103.41 407.84
860.50 149.00 711.50
321.19 68.00 253.19
782.13 137.00 645.13
1,095.50 200.88 894.62
715.25 138.37 576.88
898.75 168.03 730.72
282.19 66.09 216.10
986.81 169.00 817.81
611.75 119.87 491.88
394.25 84.72 309.53
737.25 131.00 606.25
374.00 76.00 298.00
1,091.00 184.00 907.00
279.50 66.05 213.45
183.00 49.65 133.35
872.00 151.00 721.00
947.38 176.74 770.64
676.19 122.00 554.19
421.88 89.12 332.76
418.50 89.07 329.43
44.50 26.65 17.85
1,247.13 226.08 1,021.05
365.13 81.29 283.84
308.25 70.47 237.78
335.63 75.87 259.76
522.81 105.58 417.23
27, 092.00 $5,287.13 $21,804.87
Mar 06, 2000 PAYROLL COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER Page
CHECK# EMP NUM EMPLOYEE NAME DEPT SOC -SEC -NUM CHECKBOOK /ACCT GROSS PAY DEDUCTIONS NET PAY
FICA Social Security FICA Medicare
Fed Tax Withheld Withheld Employer Owed Withheld Employer Owed Advanced EIC Payments Made
,708.00 $.00 $.00 $260.13 $260.13 $.00
TOTAL TAX LIABILITY $3,228.26
•
•
Consent Agenda Item(C
IP Staff Originator: Linda Waite Smith
Date: March 13, 2000
•
•
Topic: Adopting Resolution 2000 -28 Re- designating Community
Development Block Grant for the City of Lino Lakes for Funding
year 2000 -2001
Vote Required: 3/4
Background:
At the February 28, 2000 council meeting, the city council re- designated the
2000 -2001 CDBG based on the information received from Anoka County that
the public services cap was exceeded.
The following resolution formally re- designates $13,319 out of the public services
area and into housing rehab administered through Anoka County Communtiy
Action.
Options:
1. Approve Resolution 2000 -28
Recommendation:
1. Approve Resolution 2000 -28
Council Member introduced the following
• resolution and moved it's adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION 2000 -28
•
•
RESOLUTION RE- DESIGNATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR FUNDING YEAR 2000 -2001.
WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is anticipating receiving Community Development
Block Grant Funds for funding year 2000 -2001 in the amount of
$33,492.00 ($34,492.00 less $1,000.00 for County administration
costs), and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Housing Rehabilitation program through the
Anoka County Community Action Program, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports Alexandra House and its cause of assisting
families with intervention, prevention and community advocacy services,
and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau and
its goal of providing service to the communities youth, and
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the preparation of a Septic System Ordinance
that will promote health and safety through regulation of individual sewage
treatment systems.
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the preparation of an environmental study which
will address a Native Landscape Management Program. This plan will
incorporate specific action steps for existing and future restoration areas.
This plan will become a part of the Environmental Management Plan and
ultimately included as part to the city Comprehensive Plan
WHEREAS, The City Council supports the Preservation Development Program to
preserve open space and make for more environmentally benign
development.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $13,319.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G funds be designated for Housing Rehabilitation through the Anoka County
Community Action .
•
•
•
2. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,500.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G. funds be designated for Intervention, Prevention and Community
Advocacy Services provided by the Alexandra House.
3. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $2,673.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G funds be designated towards the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau
program.
4. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $4,000.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G. funds be used to assist in paying for the formation of a Septic System
Ordinance.
5. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $5,000.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G. funds be used to pay for an environmental study that will address a
Native Landscape Management Program.
6. That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby requests that $6,000.00 of its 2000 -2001
C.D.B.G. funds be used to assist in paying for the formation of a Preservation
Development Plan.
7. That the aforementioned dollar allocations shall be expended to the fullest extent
possible given possible public service and planning limitations at Anoka County.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 16th Day of March 2000.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 1D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator
MEETING DATE: 3/13/00
TOPIC: Resolution of Support for Continuation of Metropolitan
Bus Routes 271 and 213 in Lino Lakes
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4
BACKGROUND:
On February 28, 2000, the City Council adopted a motion directing the City
Administrator to send a letter to the Metropolitan Council objecting to proposed changes
in bus service provided to Lino Lakes residents. The letter was faxed to the Metropolitan
Council on February 29.
State Representative Ray Vandeveer has suggested that the City Council adopt a formal
resolution supporting continuation of bus routes 271 and 213 in the City of Lino Lakes.
That resolution has been prepared and is attached for consideration. With the City
Council's approval, it will be sent to specific Metropolitan Council Members per the
recommendation of Representative Vandeveer.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution supporting continuation of bus routes 271 and 213.
2. Adopt the resolution with modifications.
3. Decline to adopt the resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt the resolution and direct the City Administrator to send a copy to
Metropolitan Council members and Representative Ray Vandeveer.
•
•
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUATION OF METROPOLITAN BUS
ROUTES 271 AND 213 IN LINO LAKES
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes currently receives bus service from
Metropolitan Council routes 271 and 213; and
WHEREAS, bus routes 271 and 213 are relied upon by city residents for
transportation to jobs and other activities; and
WHEREAS, the rate of population increase in the City of Lino Lakes and the
surrounding area is among the tenth highest in the metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes, being concerned about urban sprawl and
traffic congestion, has encouraged the use of mass transit and incorporated higher density
housing into its Town Center design; and
WHEREAS, the success of the developing Town Center and a resulting decrease
in reliance on private vehicle usage is highly dependent upon reliable bus service; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes to the current service provided by bus routes 271
and 213 appear to reduce the availability, convenience and reliability of mass transit to
Lino Lakes residents; and
WHEREAS, the negative effects of the proposed changes will multiply as
population continues to grow, which seems counter productive to stated Metropolitan
goals and to adopted city goals.
•
•
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes City Council to
direct the City Administrator to prepare and send to the Metropolitan Council a letter
supporting continuation of bus routes 271 and 213 in the City of Lino Lakes and
surrounding area.
Dated: March 13, 2000
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk- Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
AGENDA ITEM 2A
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 13 March 2000
SUBJECT Cable Franchise Extension
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
The North Metro Cable Commission has recommended to it's member cities that they
extend the cable television franchise agreement with Media One to 20 November 2000. This will
give Media One and the commission the time necessary to renegotiate the franchise agreement.
Media One has agreed to the extension. All terms and provisions of the current agreement will
stay in effect during the extension.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the extension.
2. Deny the extension.
RECOMMENDATION
Number One.
•
• Council member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00-24
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE
GRANTED TO MEDIAONE NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City ") granted a
nonexclusive cable television franchise (the "Franchise ") to Merideth Cable; and
WHEREAS, the Franchise was transferred to MediaOne North Central
Communications Corp. ( "MediaOne ") in July 1998; and -
WHEREAS, MediaOne has requested a renewal of the Franchise; and
WHEREAS, The City and MediaOne are currently negotiating the terms of a
renewal of the Franchise pursuant to the informal renewal process set forth in Section
• 626(h) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §
546(h); and
•
WHEREAS, the City desires to extend the term of the Franchise from February 18, 2000
to November 20, 2000 so that negotiations may continue and;
WHEREAS, MediaOne has consented and agreed to the terms of this extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota that:
1. The term of the Franchise shall be extended from February 18, 2000 until
November 20, 2000, unless sooner revoked, cancelled or terminated.
2. All terms and conditions of the Franchise, as may be amended from time to time,
shall remain in effect during the term of the extension.
3. This extension shall not constitute a waiver of any rights the City or MediaOne
may have under (i) the Franchise, as it may be amended from time to time, (ii) the
Cable Commissions Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Television
Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications
Act of 1996; (iii) Chapter 238 of the Minnesota Statutes, Minn. Stat. § 238.01, et
seq.; or (iv) any other law or regulation.
t
• 4. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to give MediaOne additional rights or
opportunities to trigger the provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 546(a) -(g), or to require the
City or the North Metro Telecommunications Commission to conduct or
reconduct hearings or other actions properly taken in conjunction with any
renewal proceedings under the current Franchise.
•
•
5. No claim that either party may have against the other shall be released or
otherwise affected by this extension.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _ day of March, 2000.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor:
The following voted against:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Accepted by MediaOne this day of , 2000.
By:
Title
4
•
AGENDA ITEM 2B
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 13 March 2000
SUBJECT Computer/Internet Use Policy
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
As the city gets closer to Internet access, it is important to have a policy in place that will
protect the security and integrity of our data. Just as important is a policy that will outline how
our employees may use this new tool.
The city's computer system is designed to allow staff to better meet the needs of our
residents. The more proficient the research and computer skills of our employees, the better they
can serve those needs. This policy establishes guidelines for what is a permitted use of the
system and the Internet, and what is prohibited.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the attached policy.
2. Send the policy back to staff for revisions.
RECOMMENDATION
1.
•
•
Policy: Computer System & Internet Use
Approved: 13 March 2000
Effective Date: 13 March 2000
Resolution: 2000 -27
Location: Personnel Policy — Section
A. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to protect the security and integrity of the city's information systems
and to provide employees with standards of behavior when using the computer system.
B. Scope
This policy is applicable to all persons who operate any of the city's computer equipment.
C. Use of System
The information system at the City of Lino Lakes shall be used to conduct city business. No
personal use of the system is allowed during working hours. Employees are allowed to use the
computer system during non - business hours, as the city believes employees will benefit from
practice with computers. Permission for personal use must be obtained by the employee's
department director. Personal use of the city's computer system for any purposes which results in
personal profit or pecuniary gain, or for any purpose which requires storage capacity for any
length of time, is not allowed.
Users should log -off the system at the end of each day. This will prevent unauthorized use of the
system, which may be attributed to the employee and protects the city's system and data.
All information developed on, or introduced to the city's computer system is the property of the
City of Lino Lakes, regardless of where it was created. Likewise, all information developed by a
Lino Lakes employee on computers outside our system, if in conjunction with their employment
with the city, is the property of the City of Lino Lakes.
•
•
Computer/Internet Use Policy
When employees check out portable equipment such as laptop computers, they are expected to
provide appropriate "common sense" protection against theft, accidental breakage, environmental
damage and other risks. Desktop computers and attached devices are not to be removed from city
buildings.
D. Internet Use
The primary function of the city's computer system, as well as our access to the Internet, is to
assist in service delivery to our residents and customers. Allowing employees to spend personal
time learning how to use and conduct research on the Internet will ultimately result in improved
performance as city employees.
To that end, employees may access web sites for personal use after hours during non -work time.
This use is limited to web sites that are considered "business appropriate" and employees are
expected to exercise good judgment when accessing sites. Employees may not intentionally
access any site that is inappropriate for a public sector employer, or would cause embarrassment
to the organization or the employee. Some examples of inappropriate sites include adult
entertainment, sexually explicit material, web sites promoting violence or terrorism, illegal use of
controlled substances and intolerance of others.
Large files downloaded from the Internet must be copied to a diskette and printed at home.
Employees are advised to exercise discretion when using the Internet for personal business since
any use can be monitored by individuals outside the organization, and WILL BE monitored by
city staff.
E. Electronic Mail (E -Mail)
The purpose of E -mail is for city employees to share information with other city employees and
others connected via a wide area network.
E -mail should not be considered a confidential means of transferring data. Sensitive data must
be transferred using a more secure method. Messages are considered public unless otherwise
defined by the Minnesota Data Practices Act. Employees should use the same care when creating
electronic communications, as they would use with oral or other written communications.
Existing policies governing employee behavior, both within the workplace and when interacting
with the general public, apply to electronic communications. Electronic communications,
including E -mail and the contents of the employee's assigned computer, are the sole property of
the city.
E -mail messages should be retained on the system no longer than 30 days.
•
•
•
Computer/Internet Use Policy
Employees may not eavesdrop or view other user's e-mail messages without explicit permission.
F. Installation of Hardware & Software
All hardware and software will be installed or downloaded by finance staff, or at the direction of
finance staff. Users who wish to run product demonstrations, or need to "download" software
from bulletin boards or the Internet must contact finance staff for assistance. No unauthorized
software may be installed. Only software acquired by the city's acquisition process shall be used
on the city's computer system.
Employees may not duplicate licensed software or related documentation. Any such duplication
may subject employees and/or the city to both civil and criminal penalties under the United States
Copyright Act.
Individual workstations are configured to operate in a complex, networked environment.
Employees may not change their system's setup files.
G. Security
Electronic information is a significant asset of the city. The goal of information security is to
protect information from unauthorized or inappropriate access or modification.
Users shall not add security to their workstations or files. Users who believe they have security
needs beyond current city standards should contact the finance department.
System users shall identify themselves to the system by signing on with their assigned user name.
Users shall never attempt to sign on the system with any other user name. All users shall
maintain passwords as required. Passwords shall not be shared with any other user.
An employee's ability to view, add or modify information in network files or on the server is
based on access rights configured by the city. These can be changed as needed.
All diskettes and downloaded files should be scanned for viruses before data is copied on to the
city's computer system. Employees are expected to virus scan their J: drives on a periodic basis.
If an employee is not familiar with virus scanning, please contact a member of the finance
department for help.
Employees will notify the finance department in the event that a virus is found.
•
Computer/Internet Use Policy
H. Consequences of Violations
The city reserves the right to monitor and access the contents of the city's computer system,
including E -mail. The reasons for access may include, but are not limited to, monitoring
performance, productivity, customer service, compliance with city policies, and investigation of
conduct or behavior that may be illegal or adversely affect the city or the welfare of employees.
Violations of this policy may constitute just cause for discipline, including possible discharge.
I have read the "Computer System - Internet Use Policy" of the City of Lino Lakes, and agree to
abide by its terms. I understand that by using the city's computer and E -mail systems, my
assigned computer may be accessed at any time.
•
Signature Date
Name (print)
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 2C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dan Tesch, Director of Administration
MEETING DATE: 3/13/00
TOPIC: Authorize Hiring Finance Director
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4
BACKGROUND:
Applicants for the Finance Director position were recruited and interviewed by two
interview panels that included all Finance Department employees, members of the senior
management team and a representative of the City's independent audit firm. The
consensus was to offer the position to Alan J. Rolek.
Mr. Rolek has 21 years of municipal finance experience in the metro area and is currently
president of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association.
The City Administrator has negotiated with Mr. Rolek a compensation package that
• includes a starting annual salary of $68,000. His anticipated start date is April 3.
The staff recommendation is to authorize hiring Mr. Rolek, contingent upon successful
completion of all applicable background checks.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the staff recommendation to hire Al Rolek as Finance Director,
contingent upon successful completion of all background checks.
2. Revise the staff recommendation, then approve.
3. Deny the staff recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the staff recommendation to hire Al Rolek as Finance Director,
contingent upon successful completion of all background checks.
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 2D
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 13 March 2000
SUBJECT Lino Lakes Community Service Award
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
Several years ago, the city began an award program referred to as the Mayor's Award.
This program was designed to recognize citizens who had made a contribution to the community.
It is the desire of this council to once again have a mechanism by which they can recognize
citizens who make a difference in the community. This program is called the Lino Lakes
Community Service Award. The details are attached to this green sheet.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt the guidelines of the Lino Lakes Community Service Award as presented.
2. Revise the guidelines of the Lino Lakes Community Service Award.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Council prerogative.
•
•
•
•
Lino Lakes Community Service Award
(formerly known as Mayor's Award)
8 March 2000
This award is designed to recognize individuals who have made a significant contribution(s) to
the community. Contributions could come in — but not limited to - the areas of community
service, enhancing the environment or quality of life, volunteerism, lifetime service. The
Director of Administration will supervise the program.
Nominating Committee
The committee would consist of one council
member, and one member of each of our four
advisory boards. The make -up of the
committee would change each year (part of our
annual appointment process). This committee
would evaluate the applications and select two
recipients.
Nominations
Both the nominator and nominee must be Lino
Lakes residents. The application would consist
of an essay. The essay would include:
➢ a brief biography of the nominee,
➢ a list of accomplishments,
> rationale for choosing this individual to
receive the award.
Award
Recipients would receive a plaque, which
would be presented at a council meeting by the
mayor on behalf of the community. The names
of the recipients will also be placed on a plaque
at city hall. An article highlighting the winners
of the Lino Lakes Community Service Award
would be published in fall newsletter.
Time Line
A newsletter article requesting applications
will be published in the summer and fall city
newsletter (the last weeks of May & August) .
An article will be placed in the quad press as
well as a notice on the government channel.
Deadline for receiving applications will be
September 8.
The nominating committee will meet prior to
22 September to consider applications. Awards
would be presented at the second meeting in
September (25 September) of each year.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Consideration of Mutual Aid Agreement with the Cities
of Hugo and Centerville
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a proposed Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Hugo, the City of
Centerville, and the City of Lino Lakes for the provision of emergency repairs or
maintenance of any member's municipal water or sanitary sewer system.
The City requesting assistance will reimburse the City(s) who provides assistance for all
costs and expenses incurred. The receiving City also agrees to indemnify and hold
harmless the sending City(s), its officers, agents, and employees against any and all
costs, damages, and claims arising from any negligent act of the sending City's
employee.
The agreement has been reviewed by the city attorney.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Mutual Aid Agreement
2. Do not approve Mutual Aid Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
3/3/00
RD /Corr /Council /greensheet/Mutual Aid
•
•
•
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY OF HUGO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
This Agreement made and entered into this
day of
2000, by and between the CITY OF CENTERVILLE (hereinafter referred to as "Centerville "),
the CITY OF HUGO (hereinafter referred to as "Hugo "), and the CITY OF LINO LAKES
(hereinafter referred to as "Lino Lakes ").
WITNESS:
WHEREAS, all of the parties to this Agreement are Minnesota municipalities
located in close proximity to one another; and,
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of allowing the
employees of each City to come to the mutual aid and assistance of the employees of the other
cities at those times when any member City's municipal water or sanitary sewer system needs
emergency repair or maintenance work of any kind; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto enter into this Agreement to set up in advance a
reasonable method of recompensating each other for the costs of any aid which is given and to
address the issue of liability for work that may be done improperly.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual
promises and conditions contained herein, it is agreed by the parties hereto as follows:
1. Mutual Aid. Each of the parties to this Agreement agrees to make
available to the other parties members of their Public Works Departments to aid the other cities
•
•
in times of an emergency or otherwise with the maintenance, repair and operations of their
respective municipal water and sanitary sewer services.
2. Reimbursement of Costs. Should the employees of a Public Works
Department be called upon to assist another City, the City supplying the workers will then send a
bill to the City which received the assistance. Said bill will include all costs and expenses
incurred by the City which sent an employee to help another City.
3. Payment of Bill. The City who received help from another City will
promptly pay, within thirty (30) days, any bills or invoices received from another City for
services rendered under this Agreement.
4. Liability. The receiving City agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless
the sending City, its officers, agents and employees against any and all costs, damages and
claims whatsoever for damage or injury to any person or property arising from any negligent act
of the sending City's employee during the performance of this Agreement.
Nonetheless, any and all employees remain employed by the City by whom they
were hired and shall not be considered employees of any other City. Any and all claims that may
or might arise under the Workers Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said
employees shall remain the obligation of the City which regularly employs that employee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By By
, Mayor , Clerk
• STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
On this day of , 2000, before me, a
personally appeared and
of Centerville, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said
signed on behalf of the City of Centerville by the authority of the City Council
Centerville, and and
acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Centerville.
Notary Public,
, of the City
instrument was
of the City of
Notary Public
CITY OF HUGO
• By By
Walter L. Stoltzman, Mayor Mary Aim Creager, Clerk
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
On this day of 2000, before me, a Notary Public,
personally appeared WALTER L. STOLTZMAN and MARY ANN CREAGER, of the City of
Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed
on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and
WALTER L. STOLTZMAN and MARY ANN CREAGER acknowledge said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said City of Hugo.
Notary Public
CITY OF LINO LAKES
By By
, Mayor , Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
On this day of , 2000, before me, a Notary Public,
personally appeared and , of the City
of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument
was signed on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes by the authority of the City Council of the City of
Lino Lakes, and and
acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Centerville.
• Notary Public
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution 00 -25; Accepting Lino
Lakes Lions Club Donation for Kite Day
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department will be holding its fifth Kite Day event
on Saturday, June 3, 2000, at Rice Lake Elementary School. This event is free to
children in the Quad City area. It is great fun to see the children and their families
assemble the kites and fly them. What a wonderful sight to see.
When the Parks and Recreation Department was unable to obtain kites from a vendor
last year, Lino Lakes Lions Club, as a program sponsor, donated $300 to help defer the
cost of this event. The Lino Lakes Lions Club has made a $300 donation to the Kite
Day Program again this year.
OPTIONS:
1. Accept donation from Lino Lakes Lions Club and approve Resolution 00 -25.
2. Return donation from Lino Lakes Lions Club and deny Resolution 00 -25.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
sw /Rick/greensheet Lino Lakes Lions Donation — 00 Kite Day.doc
•
•
•
Council Member
adoption.
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00 -25
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club supports the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation
Department and:
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is holding its fifth Kite Day on
June 3, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the event is free to the families of Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club was made aware of the event and the desire of the Lino
Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to conduct Kite Day with the support of a program
sponsor and has donated $300.00 to the City to defer the cost of this event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the
Council accepts the Lino Lakes Lions Club donation of $300.00 to help finance Kite Day and
wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Lino Lakes Lions Club for its
donation.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of March, 2000.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, Clerk- Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
sw /rick/Resolution 00 -25 Lions Kite Day Donation.doc
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution 00 -26, Accept Donations
for Scoreboards at Sunrise Park
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The Parks Department will be installing electronic scoreboards at Sunrise Park Field #1
and Field #2. Staff received proposals from two companies and recommend that Aim
Electronics be awarded this project. Attached are specifications for the proposed
scoreboards (Model BA -518). The scoreboard panel will be forest green with a white
border stripe. The approximate total cost of the scoreboards, cable, control console
with carrying case, beams, freight, and sales tax is $5,464.35.
Two local businesses, Fast Break Corner Market and Lino Lakes State Bank, have
agreed to contribute money to help defray the costs of this project. Each company will
contribute $1,200. A 4' x 4' advertising panel will be located adjacent to the scoreboard
for a period of three years (see attached sheet). Juleen signs will be producing the
advertising panels.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution 00 -26, accepting $1,200 from Fast Break Corner Market and
$1,200 from Lino Lakes State Bank for the scoreboard project at Sunrise Park.
2. Do not approve Resolution 00 -26.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
3/3/00
RD/ Corr /Council /greensheet/scoreboard donations
•
Council Member
adoption.
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00 -26
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS FROM FAST BREAK CORNER
MARKET AND LINO LAKES STATE BANK
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department will be installing scoreboards at
Sunrise Field #1 and Field #2 and
WHEREAS, Fast Break Corner Market and Lino Lakes State Bank have agreed to contribute
$1,200 each to help defray the costs of this project; and
WHEREAS, a 4' x 4' advertising panel will be installed adjacent to the scoreboard for a period
of three years.
III NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the
Council accepts the Fast Break Corner Market and Lino Lakes State Bank donations of $1,200
each to help finance the installation of scoreboards at Sunrise Park and wishes to express its
sincere gratitude and appreciation.
•
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of March, 2000.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, Clerk - Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
3/3/00
RD /Corr /Council/Resolution 0026 scoreboards
• DAKTRONICS
•
•
sport
SCOREBOARDS
Daktronics is recognized worldwide as a
leading scoreboard designer and
manufacturer.
Five Year Warranty
Daktronics backs its products with a five year
warranty.
ETL Listed
All the permanent scoreboards shown are
ETL listed. An independent laboratory has
examined and approved them as safe.
Aluminum Construction
Daktronics uses aluminum cabinetry for a
long, rust -free life. Some manufacturers us:
steel. Our sturdy .050" aluminum face stan .
up to wind and weather.
A Lasting Finish
You're assured of a lasting finish with high
quality paint and tested, proven painting
procedures and techniques.
Digit Sunscreens
Digits and indicators are covered with speci
screens that help provide contrast and protec
lamps against flying objects. The information
is easy to read, even in the brightest sunlight.
Interchangeable Consoles
An All Sport 2000 series control console will
operate your baseball scoreboard, as well as
Daktronics models for other sports. See back
page for more details.
Scoreboard Options
You can choose from a large variety of colors
to make your scoreboard unique. Team name
captions, custom striping, identification
panels, advertising panels and electronic
message displays are also available.
Additional Models
Daktronics has the most complete line of
scoreboards available in the USA. Some
football scoreboards also have the capability
to score baseball. Contact your Daktronics
representative if you're interested.
Local Dealer Support
We've developed a network of highly qualified
dealers to sell, install and service our
products. They are there to help before,
during and after the installation of your
scoreboard, and are backed by Daktronics
professional and reliable customer service.
BALL STRIKE OUT
• • • • • • •
GUEST :•: HOME
• ••• ••• ••• •••
• • • • • •••
• ••• ••• •• • • •
• INNING :•• :•:
BA -515
The BA -515 displays basic game information with 15" digits.
Scoreboard above is shown with optional side sane
Jefferson H.S.
Bulldogs
1994 StateAA Champs
BALL STRIKE OUT
• • • • • • •
GUEST
•••
• •
•••
HOME
• ••• • ••• •••
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• •••• •• • •
• • INNING • ••• •••
BA -518
This popular economical scoreboard shows scores and inning with
18" digits and balls, strikes and outs with lamp indicators.
Scoreboard above is shown with optional side panel.
••• •••
• •
••• •••
IS • •
••• •••
TIME
BALL STRIKE OUT
• • • • • • •
GUEST :•: HOME
•••
• ••• • ••• •••
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• ••• •• • • • •
• • INNING • ••• • •••
BA -718
This scoreboard is a BA -518 with a clock that counts elapsed game
time in minutes.
• •••
• • • •
••• •••
• •
TI -218 Timer
This stand -alone timer counts minutes
up or down to make sure your softball or
baseball complex stays on schedule.
Uses 18" digits.
2 Some scoreboards are illustrated with an optional accent stripe. Models shown are not to the same scale.
All Sport® is a registered trademark of Daktronics, Inc.
•
AGENDA ITEM 5A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
DATE: Marchl3, 2000
TOPIC: DNR Collaboration "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance
Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban Interface Communities"
BACKGROUND:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has matched funds with the US Forest
Service to implement a program called "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to
Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland Urban Interface Communities ". There is a total of
$105,000 to be used for working with one or two local units of government. There are
two units of government that have been approached. These cities are the City of Lino
Lakes and the City of Hugo. The purpose of this project is to work collaboratively with
the two units of government to develop land development and management tools, which
better incorporate natural resource conservation goals. Natural resource assessment
and policy /plans will be addressed at the "landscape scale ", covering the whole
jurisdiction of the cites. A component of the program that has to do with subdivision
design will be a part for one city. Since we have been through this process, the city of
Hugo will be a host to this part of the project. GIS inventory will be addressed. This is a
good opportunity to evaluate and enhance our present inventory. Another part of this
program is to develop a guidebook to assist small acreage landowners in their resource
management decisions. This project will address issues that the Lino Lakes inventory
and Management Plan left open as future goals. Assistance with policy and code
language that is relevant to conservation development is one of those goals.
I have attached some information from the DNR and a timetable of the project. The
project would start now and proceed through the middle of 2001.
OPTIONS:
1. Provide an endorsement for the collaborative program outlined above between the
City of Lino Lakes and the Minnesota DNR and pass Resolution No. 0 0 -2 9
2. Do not participate in this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
•
•
Council Member
adoption:
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 2
A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM CALLED
"INTEGRATING NATURAL RESOURCE GUIDANCE TO ENHANCE SMART
GROWTH IN WILDLAND -URBAN INTERFACE COMMUNITIES"
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has initiated a program
called "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance To Enhance Smart Growth In Wildland-
Urban Interface Communities ", and
WHEREAS, The funding from this program is coming from the Department of Natural
Resources and the U.S. Forest Service, and
• WHEREAS, The Project offers a good opportunity to enhance and complement the City
of Lino Lakes Environmental Inventory and Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is interested in working
with The City of Lino Lakes and our neighboring City of Hugo.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. That the City of Lino Lakes supports collaborative efforts of the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources with the city of Lino Lakes
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this xxth day of , 2000
Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk
•
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and
approved by the City Council on [date].
Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk
WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECT
"Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth
in Wildland -Urban Interface Communities"
January 2000- September 2001
Briefing Paper on Local Unit of Government - Development Collaboration
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (with support from the USDA Forest
Service) is kicking off a new project called the " Wildland Urban Interface" project. This project
has two primary parts - one working with local units of government and the other to develop a
guidebook for landowners to better manage their natural resources. This paper is on the first of
these - a collaborative project with 1 or 2 local units.
Background: Need & Response
All communities are facing significant challenges in accommodating new development while
conserving critical resources. This situation is complicated by the existence of many types of
environmental review which are not always well integrated nor as timely as they could be. Now,
on top of that we're hearing about "smart growth" and wondering how all that relates.
In response, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is starting a new effort aimed at
providing more useful and better integrated assistance to local governments and landowners
dealing with development on the urban fringe (also called the "wildland -urban interface). As
DNR develops and refines its ways of providing guidance and assistance, DNR Metro Region
staff will collaborate with selected local units to determine the best ways to work together.
This project is possible at this time because the DNR received a modest grant from the USDA
Forest Service to cover some expenses for a project on "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance
to Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban Interface Communities ". Thus, the DNR will
provide some real, hands -on assistance and resources to 1 or 2 local units who are interested in
working with the DNR over the next 18 months to address habitat/woodland preservation,
wildfire, forest health, greenways, natural resources management, water quality, smart growth,
and related issues. (See separate page on "Issues" for more complete list of the topics the DNR
would like to address through this project)
Project Purpose & Scope
The DNR (in cooperation with the Minnesota Land Trust) will be working collaboratively with
one or two cities (also referred to here as local units of government - LUG's) in creating land
development and management tools which better incorporate natural resource conservation goals.
Natural resource assessment and policy /plans will be addressed at the "landscape" scale -
covering the whole jurisdiction for each city. Another component of the project on subdivision
design is proposed to be done on only 1 specific site and therefore can only be done with one
city. An interdisciplinary team of DNR Metro Region staff will be contributing to the project.
1
Inventory and Assessment of Natural Resources (March - November 2000)
• To be done for each participating city.
• Also called "a) Assessment" under the "1. Integrated Assessment & Policies @ Landscape
(LUG) Scale" in the Forest Service funding proposal & work plan (copies in notebook).
Will include detailed land cover mapping (to 1 acre polygons) for each city's total geographic
area (pending availability of additional matching funds, e.g. through LUG's, watershed
district, Metro Greenways planning grant, and Minnesota ReLeaf community forest inventory
grant program),
• Will include some form of wildfire risk assessment, natural plant community and habitat
inventory and assessment, forest health assessment, wetland classification (if needed), plus
other assessments TBD
• GIS -based data layers and maps of existing information and various assessments with
accompanying narratives will be generated and provided to the city and other project
cooperators /funders.
The inventory and assessments will be useful in focusing the rest of the project on the city's
most critical and significant natural resource issues and opportunities.
Evaluation and Recommendations on Policies & PIans (April 2000 - Mar 2001)
To be done for each participating city.
Also called "b) Policies" and "c) Recommendations" under the "1. Integrated Assessment &
Policies @Landscape (LUG) Scale" in the Forest Service funding proposal & work plan
(copies in notebook). .
All of the city's relevant policies, comprehensive plan chapters, ordinances, management
plans and practices, etc. which relate to or affect natural resource resources could be
addressed. Focus may be on one or more of these that are critical in land development and
natural resource conservation and are under current consideration by the city. Which are
covered will be based on the city's needs and, to a lesser degree, the DNB's goals.
• Any vision statements, goals, etc, that the city has related to natural resource conservation
could be a useful basis for the project.
• A checklist will be developed by the DNR to use in a process of evaluating the effectiveness
of the city's current policies etc. in conserving natural resources (and achieving natural
resource- related smart growth concepts).
• Some examples of sample model ordinance language and guidelines (including some on
sustainable development and smart growth as well as natural resource protection) and other
conservation tools will be compiled and offered to the city for consideration.
• Recommendations will be developed on ideas and/or options for better integrating natural
resource conservation and related smart growth concepts into existing city policies, plans,
practices, etc.
Subdivision Concept Plans (May 2000 - May 2001)
• To be done only for one site (a whole proposed subdivision study site) in one city.
• Also called "2. Integrated Development Plan @ Subdivision Scale" in the Forest Service
funding proposal & work plan (copies in notebook).
• The DNR and the Minnesota Land Trust (MLT) would cooperate with the city and a
landowner /developer who is interested in looking at options for natural resource conservation
in their subdivision design and management and who is willing to work with the DNR/MLT
•
•
in exploring conceptual design options.
• Will include a more detailed natural resource inventory of the subdivision study site using the
developer /landowner's site survey/basemap and the project's land cover mapping as a basis
(with the nature of the more detailed inventory based on the land cover mapping).
• Guidelines for integrated smart growth and natural resource conservation in subdivision
planning and design would be developed and agreed upon by all parties early in the process.
• MLT would develop a series of alternative conceptual site plans which show a range of ways
responding to the guidelines in the site Layout and conservation. areas. These conceptual
plans would be created and revised through consultation with project partners.
• One or more of these conceptual plans would be presented to a city board/commission as part
of a discussion of potential revisions to the city's subdivision. ordinance.
• MLT/DNR would develop suggestions and/or-options for ongoing protection and
management of natural resources on this subdivision site (e.g. conservation easement and
forest management plan).
• Will include exploration of how this subdivision could become part of the DNR's
Neighborhood Wilds Program (for involving homeowner's in cooperative natural resource
education and on- the - ground demonstration projects).
Final Report (July - September 2001)
A final project report documenting this process and key findings will be prepared and distributed
to the Forest Service and all local partners.
Requested City Commitment (preliminary draft - 2/3/00)
To be selected as a project city; the DNR would like the city to pass a resolution, memorandum
of understanding, or take some official action in support of this project with the following
provisions requested:
• the city will provide DNR with a copy of any policies, ordinances, etc. to be considered in
this project;
if needed, the city will allow project team members doing the natural resource assessment on
to any city property and encourage other owners to also give their permission;
• city staff and/or board/commission members be willing to meet periodically on the project;
DNR & other participants can periodically present project findings to a city board/
commission of the city's choosing); and
the city will make a good faith effort to consider and, where in the city's interest, to
implement findings from the project.
In addition, for the city to be selected as the location for the subdivision design part of the
project, the DNR would like:
• the city would provide to the DNR (and Minnesota Land Trust) the names of landowners
and/or developers who may be interested in the participating in the project;
• the city, the landowner /developer, and the DNR/MLT will concur that the proposed
subdivision study site serves each of our purposes for this project;
• the city is willing to be the DNR/MLT "client" on this project and participate in the process
(e.g. in developing or reviewing guidelines and in project review) - but that this participation
doesn't take the place of any official city review processes, nor does it commit the city to
approve the subdivision;
•
•
1
• the landowner /developer is interested in looking at options for natural resource conservation
in a subdivision design and management and is willing to work with DNR/MLT in exploring
conceptual design options;
• the landowner /developer and/or city will provide an adequate scaled survey or basemap for
the subdivision study site (preferably with 2' contour intervals);
• the landowner /developer will provide funds for and/or have conducted a reasonably detailed
natural resource inventory of the subdivision study site (this would build on the land cover
mapping done by this project, and would preferably also include location and inventory of
any rare, endangered, or threatened specie as well as significant trees and wetland
delineation);
• the landowner /developer will allow the DNR/MLT . access to the site for natural resource
assessment and planning purposes;
the city and landowner /developer understand that the conceptual designs generated through
this project would not substitute for the professional engineering and design work that the
developer would need in order to meet the city's subdivision requirements or for project
implementation purposes; and
the city and/or landowner /developer will try to share the results of this project with any future
planners, owners, managers, etc of the subdivision study site.
•
DNR's Smart Growth Initiative
•
i
Framework for Action
On October 5, 1999, the Ventura Administration rolled out its Big Plan for the next several years.
The main focus was on the first of four major strategies that make up the Big Plan: Creating Healthy,
Vital Communities. A key initiative under this strategy is the Governor's Smart Growth Initiative,
entitled Growing Smart in Minnesota. The DNR's Smart Growth Initiative has been developed
within the context of the Governor's Smart Growth Initiative.
Goals of the Ventura Smart Growth Initiative and DNR's Smart Growth Initiative
The Governor's Smart Growth Initiative has three goals:
1) Maximize economic opportunity for all while protecting and enhancing the assets that make
Minnesota a great place to live -- healthy communities, clean air and water, and Minnesota's unique
natural, cultural, and historical areas.
2) Mang ge natural resources and agricultural land to ensure they are sustained for future generations.
3) Be fiscally prudent by building on existing public investments and avoiding future costs down the
road.
The DNR's strategic plan Directions for Natural Resources lays the foundation for DNR's role in
land use decisions and in the Governor's Smart Growth Initiative. That foundation lies in DNR's
vision of sustainability— "protecting and restoring the natural environment while enhancing economic
opportunity and community well- being," and is reflected in our goal to "maintain, enhance, or restore
the health of Minnesota's ecosystems so that they can continue to serve environmental, social, and
economic purposes." DNB's strategic plan recognizes the importance of working in partnership with
communities, local governments, agencies, and organizations to "manage the state's diverse natural
resources for a sustainable quality of life."
Smart growth is fundamentally about bringing people together to bring about the greatest societal
benefit from land use decisions. Appendix 1 provides further detail about DNR's role in smart
growth, including why DNR cares about smart growth issues and DNR's community -based
approach.
Principles for Success
The Governor's Smart Growth Initiative outlines four common -sense principles that will guide
1
public decisions and achieve the results Minnesotans expect:
1) Stewardship: Use land and natural resources wisely to sustain them for the future.
2) Efficiency: Make more efficient, integrated public investments intransportation, housing, schools,
utilities, information infrastructure, and other public services.
3) Choice: Give communities smart growth options and choices.
4) Accountability: Reinforce responsibility and accountability for development decisions.
Under the Stewardship principle, the Governor's initiative states that "Minnesota will protect the
environment and conserve agricultural land, open space and other lands that support sustainable
outdoor recreation, tourism, and natural- resource -based industries. This will allow for growth that
is sustainable for the long - term." These four principles will also guide the DNR in implementing
its smart growth initiative.
DNR's Relationship With Local Units of Government
DNR hA s a legitimate role in advocating the conservation and protection of natural resources for the
benefit of all Minnesotans, at the local level as well as at regional and statewide levels. DNR
recognizes, however, that state statutes clearly provide local government with the authority and
responsibility for local land use planning. DNR needs to respect the fact that local government
officials have complex decisions to make with limited information and resources to satisfy multiple
competing interests. Most Local land use decision makers (e.g., elected officials, zoning board
members) have good intentions and are trying to make the best decisions for their communities, often
with little or no pay. DNR needs to maintain and improve its complex relationship with local units
of government by focusing more effort on providing positive incentives and timely, reliable natural
resource information to help local officials make these complex decisions, and then respect the
decisions once they are made.
Strategies for Growing Smart in Minnesota
To accomplish Minnesota's smart growth goals, the Ventura administration has identified three
major strategic directions:
1) Engage citizens in planning and decision - making;
2) Position and align state government for smart growth; and
3) Provide communities with effective tools for smart growth.
2
10,
•
Internal and external DNR actions that would help build a strong natural resource foundation for the
statewide initiative are identified below under each of the three major strategic directions.
Strategy 1: Engage citizens in planning and decision- making
1) Increase emphasis on early coordination and communication.with local, regional and other state
interests on planning and development through comprehensive planning.
2) Continue to provide assistance to local governments and Minnesota Planning in their efforts to
engage citizens in implementing the Community -Based Planning Act.
Strategy 2: Position and Align State Government for Smart Growth
3) Identify and compile all MN statutes and laws that give DNR authority for natural resource and
land use issues related to smart growth.
4) Identify smart growth goals and objectives that can serve as criteria against which DNR's current
policies and programs can be critically evaluated.
5) Based on the criteria identified in the second action, ensure that DNR annual or biennial work
plans starting with FY 2001 are consistent with smart growth principles. Priority will be shifted
from activities that impede smart growth or have mixed effects. This will involve all units that
develop work plans.
6) Assess the suitability and flexibility of DNR rules related to shoreland zoning, floodplain
regulation, water regulatory controls, and State Wild and Scenic Rivers in attaining smart growth
goals.
7) Identify DNR programs that impede smart growth, have mixed effects or promote smart growth.
Within the constraints of legal and policy mandates, eliminate or scale back programs that impede
smart growth, and refocus programs with mixed effects to increase their positive contributions.
Expand programs that are contributing to smart growth. These actions would be undertaken by
division and regional management teams.
8) Initiate and seek funding for a statewide Greenways program. Minnesota Greenways is
envisioned as a statewide network of public and private natural areas, parks and recreation areas,
wildlife habitat, and other open spaces interconnected by land and water corridors. A critical first
step is to use GIS technology to identify existing and potential greenways. Minnesota Greenways
will rely on collaborative private- public partnerships and voluntary approaches with minimal public
land acquisition.
3
•
9) Actively work with the Governor's office and other state agencies to align agency goals, policies,
and programs to promote smart growth.
10) Obtain seats and play a leadership role on key boards and working groups addressing smart
growth to insure that natural resource concerns are addressed (e.g., Transportation Advisory Board,
Environmental Quality Board (EQB), EQB's Urban Development GEIS Scoping Group, MNDOT's
Interregional Corridor Study Steering Committee, Minnesota Planning's State Development Strategy
Steering Committee, the Governor's Interagency Smart Growth Work Group, Minnesota Smart
Growth Network).
11) Via the Commissioner and other DNR leadership, proactively demonstrate to other state agencies
the fundamental role played by the DNR in smart growth, focusing on what the DNR can bring to
the table that benefits other agencies' and collaborative efforts.
12) Work with other local, regional, and state agencies and organizations to design a long -term,
comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system so that the success of the Govemor's Smart
Growth Initiative can be measured. Within the context of this broader effort, develop a monitoring
and evaluation system for DNR efforts related to smart growth.
13) Work with other agencies and organizations to assess the adequacy of existing data bases to
provide indicators that can measure the status of landscapes and ecological conditions.
Strategy 3: Provide Communities with Effective TooLs for Smart Growth
14) Identify key elements and tools needed for smart growth (e.g., integrated GIS mapping of natural
resource information). Accelerate existing DNR programs and projects that are already working to
provide these key elements.
15) Increase the accessibility and useability of natural resource information to local units of
government, businesses, landowners, non - governmental organizations, and other state agencies, and
provide training on how to effectively access and use this information in local land use decision -
making.
16) Develop a set of ecological principles and guidelines for land use management, such as those
developed by the Ecological Society of America (Ecological Principles and Guidelines for Managing
the Use of Land, 1999), to help guide DNR' s smart growth initiative. The guidelines would include
elements such as examining impacts of local decisions in a regional context and retaining large
contiguous or connected areas that contain critical habitats.
17) Redirect efforts of selected DNR area or region staff to place more emphasis on developing and
maintaining partnerships with and providing technical services to local governments and
communities, including businesses, especially in major growth areas. These staff, who would be
4
•
•
}
identified and selected by regional management teams, would have the interest, skills, and
experience to spend part oftheir time serving as interdisciplinary community liaisons. DNR liaisons
would provide a means for local land use decision makers -to tell us what information and services
they need to make the best decisions. These staff would also be provided with targeted training
opportunities to better understand and serve the needs of local units of government, and to enhance
relevant skills.
18) Redirect efforts of selected DNR area, region, and St. Paul staff to provide efficient delivery of
information and technical assistance to local communities. This would involve identifying
specialists and task forces that can provide assistance on specific topics (e.g., GIS services,
interpretation of Natural Heritage information, hydrologic analysis, wildlife population dynamics,
wildfire hazard reduction) that can be on call when needed in a community.
19) Provide DNR support for funding the Urban Development GEIS. If the Urban Development
GEIS is not funded, collaborate with other state agencies (e.g., Minnesota Planning, PCA, BWSR,
Agriculture) to assess the impacts of different development patterns on environmental and natural
resource conditions.
Appendix 1. DNR's Role in Smart Growth
Why DNR Cares About Smart Growth
Smart growth is fundamentally about bringing people together to obtain the greatest societal.benefit
from land use decisions. Although most land use decisions are made at the local level, state agencies
also play a vital role in the land use decision making process, and have the potential to play a more
constructive, collaborative role than they do at present. Because growth is directly dependent on
natural resources (e.g., land, water, aggregate resources, minerals, timber), and DNR is the state
agency with primary responsibility for conserving those resources, DNR has amajor interest in smart
growth. DNR also has major responsibility for protecting other natural resources (e.g., fish and
wildlife, natural areas) and providing outdoor recreational opportunities that influence and are
affected by growth (e.g., in state parks, state trails and waterways, state forests, and other lands).
At present, many local land use decisions are resulting in unnecessary loss of diverse natural habitats,
degradation of surface and groundwater systems, decreased availability of future water supplies, and
reduced access to recreational areas and commercial resources like timber and minerals. The
Governor's Smart Growth Initiative provides DNR and other state agencies with an opportunity to
develop a shared common vision about how growth should proceed in Minnesota from a statewide
perspective, with more focus on conserving natural resources and protecting the environment. As
an agency responsible, for sustaining the environmental, economic, and social benefits and values
Minnesotans desire, DNR is in a pivotal position to contribute to this initiative.
5
•
•
•
As manager often percent of Minnesota's land (5 3 million acres), DNR makes many local land use
decisions directly. Equally important, the agency also influences many other local land use decisions
by providing financial and technical assistance, enforcinglaws, and implementing a wide array of
other policies and programs. DNR is uniquely positioned to identify, compile, synthesize, map, and
interpret natural resources information useful to local governments, businesses, landowners, public
interest groups, and other state agencies in generating more predictable, sustainable land use
planning and development approaches. DNR has experienced scientists and other staff from diverse
disciplines who can provide constructive guidance for and identify consequences of local land use
decisions. The Governor's Smart Growth Initiative provides an opportunity for DNR to improve
availability and utility of natural resource information to help local governments, communities,
businesses, and landowners make more informed land use and development decisions. A positive
outcome of the initiative will be improved collaboration and dialogue between DNR and local
governments, other local community interests, and other state agencies.
DNR's Community Based Approach
Many local communities and citizens have expressed a need for better information about the costs
and benefits of different kinds of development and the need for a planning process that "could help
communities find ways to balance individual needs with the greater good "' (Common Ground.,
Achieving Sustainable Communities in Minnesota, 1995). DNR recognizes and respects citizens'
ability and desire to make the best decisions affecting natural resources to benefit their communities,
families, and the state as a whole. To that end, the agency is committed to identifying ways to
improve and increase the assistance and resources it provides to local communities (citizens,
businesses, local government agencies, and non - governmental organizations) so that they have better
information with which to make land use decisions.
6
Office of Governor Jesse Ventura
•
Growing smart in Minnesota
Framework for action
Minnesota is growing and changing fast. The question before Minnesota is not whetherwe
grow — we will. The real question is howwe can grow in ways that improve the prosperity
and quality of life for all as Minnesota competes in the knowledge, service -based and just -in-
time economy of the 21st century. Our edge in this competition is the vitality of our economy,
the soundness of our infrastructure, the quality of our workforce, the health of our
environment the quality and abundance of our farmland and natural resources, and the
attractiveness of our communities.
Economic competitiveness is important not only to urban areas, but to regional growth
centers and rural communities as well. All parts of the state face the challenge of maximizing
economic opportunity and connecting people to housing, transportation and jobs.At the
same time Minnesota must protect and enhance the environment and other assets that keep
communities attractive places to live and work. This is what smart growth is all about.
With smart growth, some things must grow -- jobs, productivity, wages, education, housing
opportunities, savings, profits, opportunity and knowledge. Others — pollution, waste and
poverty — must not.
Goals of the Ventura Smart Growth Initiative
Minnesotans care deeply about their state and want a strong economy, a healthy
environment and robust, vital communities, both for themselves and for future generations.
First the state must listen to citizens, businesses and local governments, and encourage their
participation and involvement at the local level in deciding what smart growth williook like
in their community.
The goals of Governor Ventura's Smart Growth initiative are to:
■ Maximize economic opportunity for all while protecting and enhancing the assets
that make Minnesota a great place to live — healthy communities, dean air and
water, and Minnesota's unique natural, cultural and historical areas.
■ Manage natural resources and agricultural land to ensure they are sustained for
future generations.
■ Be fiscally prudent by building an existing public investments and avoiding future
costs down the road.
•
"We need community
*involvement and
collaboration, nor.
conflict. We need
common- setae
incentives for malting
smart decisions, and
consequences, when
necessary, for making
shop- sighzed ones."
Governor Jesse Ventura
Second, the state must be consistent Minnesota needs to art out the mixed signals, policies and
investments that encourage short-sighted growth and re -align its polities, resources and
incentives to foster smart growth. In addition, Minnesota needs to evaluate and realign state
regulations so they dereractivities contrary to smart growth principles and promote activities
consistent with the principles.
Third, the state needs to support communities as they pursue smart growth strategies. The
state should offer incentives rather than top -down mandates, and support local governments
around the state that make sustainable development choices.
Principles for success
Smart growth offers options for how Minnesota can develop and change while enhancing
its quality of life. It is not a one-size-fit-all approach. While there are many options for smart
growth, these common -sense principles will guide public decisions and achieve the results
Minnesotans expect
■ Stewardship: Use land and natural resources wisely to sustain them for the
future. Minnesota will protect the environment and conserve agricultural land, open space
' and other lands that support sustainable outdoor recreation. tourism and natural-resource-
based industries. This will allow for growth that is sustainable for the long term.
■ Efficiency: Make more efficient, integrated public investments in
transportation, housing, schools, utilities, information infrastructure and
other public services. Minnesota needs to coordinate and link its tax policies with smart
growth. It also must coordinate and link public investments in transportation, information
infrastructure, land use, housing, schools and utilities so they expand economic opportunity
for the entire state. By maintaining and improving existing investments in roads, schools
and utilities, rather than needlessly making expensive new investments on the edges of
communities, Minnesota will avoid wasteful public spending and support economic growth.
tt Choice: Give comrrfunities smart growth options and choices. Communities
can be shaped by choice, or they can be shaped by chance. The state will work with local
governments to encourage dtizen and business participation in decisions about what
smart growth should look like. Minnesota will create choices and incentives for linking
transportation, housing, jobs, education and the amenities that make communities desirable
places to live.
■ Accountability: Reinforce responsibility and accountability for development
decisions. For smart growth to become a reality, everyone -- individuals, businesses and
government — must make smart choices and take responsibility for the true costs and
consequences of the decisions they make. The marketplace can be an effective force for
smart growth, but only if state and local policy sends consistent signals and development
decisions are predictable, fair and cost effective. If communities choose to make short-
sighted development decisions, it is not up to Minnesota taxpayers to pay the costs of
their mistakes.
l
(
1
•
Strategies for growing smart in Minnesota
To accomplish Minnesota's smart growth goals, the Ventura administration has identified
three major strategic directions.
Strategy 1: Engage citizens in planning and decision - making
For smart growth to become a reality, Minnesota needs an active, informed citizenry and ,
business community participating in planning and decision- making at the local level. To
accomplish this, the state of Minnesota will partner with local governments, business groups,
civic organizations and others to:
■ Engage•citizens in defining what smart growth looks like and assessing the costs and
consequences of development alternatives, through visual preference surveys, community
dialogs, forums and other tools.
▪ Promote better coordination and communication with state, local and regional interests on
planning and development through comprehensive planning.
▪ Continue to provide citizens with comprehensive planning choices by eliminating the
June 2001 sunset of the Community -Based Planning Act. Conduct an independent analysis
of the Community -Based Planning program as the basis for future changes to the Act
1 Strategy 2: Position and align state government for
smart growth
For smart growth to work, Minnesota must align its incentives with its goals. This means
linking investments and policies for transportation, housing, economic development,
environmental protection and natural resources management so they encourage economic
opportunity while sustaining Minnesota's quality of life. The state must lead by example, by
incorporating smart growth principles into its planning and spending process, and by
providing incentives for local governments to make smart growth chokes.
To accomplish this, the Governor's Smart Growth initiative will;
■ Inventory current state government policies and incentives and resources to determine
how they work for or against smart growth. Identify and focus on 'flash points' where
competing policy goals hamper progress on smart growth.
■ Work with Governor Ventura's Tax Reform Project to evaluate what changes to the tax
system are necessary to promote smart growth. Ensure that any new tax incentives for smart
growth can demonstrate measurable results and are consistent with Governor Ventura's
goals for a simpler, more equitable tax system.
Amk ■ Reform other state incentives and policies to reinforce smart growth principles. Ensure
consistency between transportation and other infrastructure investments and land -use plans.
•
•
"As a former mayor,
I believe in local
control, but I also
believe that since
public invesanerrts
cross local
boundaries, we must
have regions that
work as a whole."
Geten,er Jesse Venters
■ Craft a flexible state development strategy and - support regional strategies that link
investments and policy to:
reflect the needs and preferences of citizens, communities and businesses
conserve Minnesota's farms, farmlands, greenways and other natural resources
tie public investments to smart growth'plans
■ Create a system of greenways throughout the state, built on collaborative public - private
partnerships and voluntary approaches, with minimal public land acquisition.
■ Develop tools for reviewing major statewide spending and bonding bills to assess how
well new state investments promote smart growth,
■ Develop smart growth indicators that demonstrate Our progress and success.
Strategy 3: Provide communities with effective tools
for smart growth
All around Minnesota, local governments are bringing smart growth principles to reality
with innovative new development and zoning policies. Often, the best solutions are those
hammered out at the local level. Ifs up to local governments and regional organizations,
with the substantive participation of citizens, to decide what smart growth will look like in
each community. The state must support these efforts so that the whole makes sense.
To accomplish this, Minnesota will:
■ Change the way the state does business, to provide integrated, responsive service
to communities.
■ Provide communities with better tools and assistance for evaluating the costs and
consequences of development decisions, and more effective incentives for incorporating
smart growth principles into planning and development.
▪ Strengthen and improve tools for agricultural and preservation.
▪ Identify those areas of urban life and development where we. need better understanding
and, develop that understanding through the Urban Development Generic Environmental
Impact Statement,
This information was prepared for the Governor's Office by Minnesota planning and the
Metropolitan Council in cooperation with outer state agencies. For more information, call
Minnesota Planning at 651 -296 -3985 or the Metropolitan Council at 651 -602 -1000. Upon
request this information will be provided in an alternative format, such as Braille, large print
or audiotape. For TTY, contact Minnesota Relay Service at 800- 627 -3529 and ask for
Minnesota Planning. October 1999
{
{
•
•
PRIORITY ISSUES & TOPICS
Issues
issues & topics this project would like to address
* priority issues (for DNR/ Forest Service)
• other issues (to be considered)
* habitat /woodland conservation (preservation)
— connectivity / greenways
— reducing impacts of parcelization
— reducing construction damage on trees
— biological diversity, rare species
— invasive exotics
— forest health
— ecological restoration
* wildfire
— identification of wildfire prone landscapes
— reduction of damage to life & property
relation to fire dependent habitats
* natural resources inventory & baseline data
— land cover /land classification
— 2' contour intervals (needed at least for subdivision plans)
— comprehensive landscape resource map at LUG scale
— subdivision scale natural resource inventory & comprehensive resource.map
* regulatory review
— what state reg's (e,g_ shoreland, wetland) may affect what LUG's can do
— identify gaps in LUG's reg's & how to close
— identify existing LUG reg's. preventing them from reaching goals
* wetland classification plans
— related to storm water ponds
— including wetland replacement (WACA)
* stormwater management - runoff - infiltration
— water quality
— less impervious surface
— relation to place in watershed
— relation to PCA, Met Council
— do it right the first time
— relation to watershed district & water plans
•
•
•
* outdoor recreation information / potential
- hunting, bird watching, fishing, trails -
- benefits of biodiversity
- • management recommendations
* naturaI resource management
- coordination among different natural resources •
- best management practices for LUG's & landowners
- management plans for conservation lands
- forest management of small ownerships
* developmentpatterns & density
- to develop or not (rural or urban or in between)
- smart growth guidelines
- related to habitat & quality of life
- density of development
- Met Council forces development to occur. / MUSA
- lower density and higher transportation & utilities cost
- tradeoffs - houses in forest vs housing on ag land (need new models)
- realistic development patterns
- sustainable development model ordinances
* land ownership /parcelization & private land ownership issues
- most natural resources are on their land
- re: resource protection, recreation opportunity
- get data layer from county
- what land protection options do LUG's have for landowners / which options
have potential?
* infrastructure - relation of existing & proposed to other issues
- roads, utilities, cable, septic systems, etc.
- parks & trails
- planned development (not having to retrofit for infrastructure)
OTHER ISSUES & TOPICS
• water resource issues
- susceptibility to ground water pollution
- point & non -point source pollution
- water availability (conflicts in use)
• shoreland & wetland restoration
• wildlife
- non -game wildlife/ wildlife habitat
- nuisance wildlife e.g. deer population, geese, coons, muskrats, etc.
• agricultural & Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land
- concern on conversion to non - native trees (vs. to native e.g. savanna)
• economics
- non - traditional forest products
- benefits of guidelines to property values
- economic benefit to LUG / developer 4 subdivision level
- realtors interest in Smart Growth (related to property values
- tax issues & disincentives (property & inheritance taxes
• wood utilization
- related to tree care companies, disaster response, & land clearing
• parks & open space inventories
- what's their & potential - check on Dorothy Anderson's (UofM) study for Met
Council
• natural disaster preparedness (tree emergency response)
'• expanding existing forest cover
- potential for restoration to increase forest cover.
- value of tree canopy cover
• Smart Growth component - concept of rural legacy
- e.g. high value farm land
- need for viable NR -based economy (with enough resource base)
- related to fragmentation Sr leapfrog development
- e.g. parts of Washington, Dakota, Carver, & Scott counties
• transportation planning
- relation to transit planning
- is this project focusing on these more intense corridors or places in between
• prime agricultural land study & tax burden
- Mn Extension Service study (Tom Wegner)
• • how to deliver information to users
•
•
Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban
Interface Communities
PROJECT BUDGET - Preliminary (revised 1/31/99)
breakdown by component
1. Assessment & Policies
2. Development Plan
3. Landowner Guidebook
4. Final Report
Budget Category
Forest Service
Cooperator Cost
Total
Items
Grant $
Items
Inkind
Salary & Benefits
$ 0
1. Staff- $18,000
2. Staff - $6,000
3. Staff & advisors -
$ 12,000; I&E -
$5,000
4. Staff- 53,000
$ 43,000
$ 43,000
Copying/Printing
3. Guidebook printing
(10,000 copies)
$ 20,000
1-4. (gm. office &
final report)
$ 5,000
$ 25,000
Contractual
•
1. Cover mapping -
$12,000
2. Land Trust - 59',000
3. writer - 53,000;
Illustrator - 56,000
$ 30,000,
3. Writer (CFM $)
5 5,000
$ 35,000
Supplies
$ 0
1 -4. (gen. office)
$ 1,000
$ 1,000
Other (phone, fax,
mailing)
$ 0
1.4. (gen, office)
$ 1,000
$ 1,000
TOTAL
$ 50,000
$ 55,000
$105,000
Note: Ss are needed (or need to be shifted for subdivision scale NR inventory)
IrV
c
o
1 ° 1 1 ° 1
t 1
cane (Local Unit of Government) Scale I
•
•
ma=r
o
Jan Feb I Mad Apr May l June l July I Aug I Sept ! Oct 1 Novi Dec
•
r
I•
,
1.
Iajor Tasks
.rm interdisciplinary team & hold meetings
nalize work plan & budget
welop strategy for outside advisors
Irm LUG workgroup (1 &2) & hold meetings
wet w/Mn Land Trust on options
contract w/MLT
R
CA
y
al Q
C7
v
feel w/ LUG(s) on issues & proj. scope
et comnittnent from LUG(s)
o contract(s) for land cover mapping
antractor; complete land cover napping
eterrnine assessment procedures
E
v,
a`.
40
40
ea
u
H
W
Sa
U
o'
onduct other assessments
T
ea
a
o
cl
d
a
i0
v
G
d
1
resent assessment to LUG(s) [board1(s)
U
c
m
g
C]
R
I.E.
N
1 1 1 1 1 t • 1
Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar E Apr t May 1 June; July i Aug Sept
.-------
- - - -
-,
- -_-----------
.-
- - -
---
,•�,
'.Teri
. Integrated Development Plan (i Subdivision Seale (See workgroup above)
- --
- --
- - --
- --
-- - -- - --
- --
;., ::I,,:,;,..., •
- -- i- ,-''''',- .
a■,.
j•
l
• P
i'y�
1.
i
EN
July i Aug i Sept i Oct I Novi Dec
...__
- .�-.._�
•
---
- -_
--
- - --
i•'
Jam.
h'
'�
a
.;:c..:::
---
" ' :''
;:.
. it
-
~ , -i�
ii:i:i:ii:
,�
1 i
Mar Apr
' '
�;
eer
ti
'
1
L
;ajor Tasks
& c) Policies & Recommendations
;velop procedures j
.terview LUG(s) on policies, mgml etc
Main copy of plans etc from LUG
;cure/develop integrated NR & smart growth
guidelines (checklist)
a
c...)
6
tip
RI
P.
G
4
0
y
R''
„
:view documents
tmpile evaluations
svelop recommendations
:esent recommend. to LUG(s) [board](s)
;ek commitments & begin implemention
•
V
z
O
iscuss guidelines w/LUG reps.
ILT: work w/LUG to find landowner -
developer partner &. secure commitments
•
)nduct subdivision scale NR inventory
ILT; create /revise concept plans w /partners
valuate plans using criteria
resent concept plans to LUG[board)
0
�+
fl
=
_
0cc
i> a
cd
1LT: develop implementation/mgmt, plan
egin implementation
`n
yy
y8
UO
Q
C
a)
C
V
O
2001
Jan Feb i Mar I Apr i May i June i July I Aug! Set
Integrated Landowner Guidebook (4 Site (Individual Landowner) Scale '
41.1:_
1
,
I
_... ...
+--- -�--
O
+�--
- -
+ - -r
-- _.-------
r
+---
+- --r
- --
'�,
----------
�.-
-r
- +._
tl
•
2000
Jan i Feb i Mari Apr I May I June i July 1 Aug I Sept i Oct i Nov Dec
•
•I�1
1^„
II• � I.
-----------------
-
to
n
RI
;velop preliminary description
'rnt work/advisory group & hold meetings
nd existing examples
a
C
t.0..
0
o
:cure writer
titer: prepare & revise draft(s)
:view drafts
Titer: do final edit
:cure illustrator
lustrator: prepare & revise illustrations
=
0
a
pprove final artwork & text
rrB: do & revise layout
U
A
o
as
°cure printer & provide copy
tinter: print & deliver copies
ssure that copy design fits w/web
ut guidebook an web
etermine guidebook distribution
istribute guidebook
b
O
O
L•.
O
.O
CO
z
;o
F
O
O
b
no
rg
,ocwnenl distribution & use
O
cul
R
eti
��
p
N
C
O
r.T.,
�
G
7
>
•
•
:d
is
a3
p
ea
1.....9
G0.
L*
48
. `3
�
0
fl
on
W
„L]
U
G
d
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 511
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 3/13/00
TOPIC:
First Reading: Ordinance No. 04 -00 offering the sale of
property in the Apollo Business Park to NoI -Tec Systems,
Inc.
Vote Required: Simple majority
BACKGROUND:
NoI -Tec Systems in the Apollo Business Park would like to purchase a .79 -acre
city owned parcel just north of the company's site (see attached map). This is a
remnant parcel between NoI -Tec and the Fogerty development to the north. The
company is interested in holding this site for future expansion. The city and Nol-
Tec agreed to a purchase price of $41,900, plus assessments.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 04 -00 offering the sale of property
in the Apollo Business Park to Nol -Tec Systems, Inc.
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
• Councilmember introduced the following ordinance
and moved its adoption:
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 04 -00
AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES
OF A PARCEL OF LAND IN APOLLO BUSINESS PARK
The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
I.
The real property described as: a portion Lot 3, Block 1, containing .79 acres, Apollo
Business Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, which is located west of Apollo Drive (the
"Property ") is owned by the City of Lino Lakes (the "City "). The city council of the City
has determined that the Property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose.
II.
The city council of the City authorizes sale of .79 acres to Nol -Tec Systems, Inc. for
$41,900. The mayor and city clerk - treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute
such deed and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the Property.
Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the requirements
of the city charter.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage
and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter.
ATTEST:
Ry -chel Gaustad, Clerk- Treasurer
John Bergeson, Mayor
• The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by councilmember
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
First Reading Approved on
Second Reading Approved on
Published in the official newspaper on
•
•
, 2000
, 2000
, 2000
•
15
� z
0
0 1
I-
I
n
z l
P1
M
- - STATE TRUNK H ;GHWAY ?:3.49 -
z
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 5C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland
MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: FINAL PLAT - Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
This request represents the final phase of the Pheasant Hills Preserve Development,
Pheasant Hills 11`'' Addition. The plat consists of 50 single family lots. The property is
Zoned R -1X, Single Family Executive and indicated as residential on our land use plan.
The City Attorney has reviewed the Title Commitment and has had no adverse
comments. A development agreement and financial guarantees are in place. The City
Engineer has approved the final grading and utility plans. A trail connection will be
provided, as indicated in the preliminary plat, that will connect the existing neighborhood
park to the northern portion of Sherman Lake Road.
Staff would recommend approval of this final plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th
Addition.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Final Plat as submitted.
2. Return to staff for further discussion.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
CENTERVILLE
LAKE
7 St :MP F ilt ii#01174t•
E .!L,..
pp:M.71 !Rateillibitall
1
AZTX4 -4.*.oi., WA 44V■ flr i
grAir: 1
S14/;:t5b ku '40:01014
IIKV■Cf 1 big hii..._
Talre9;4 BP• i Et
aCIPP.311
Vat Mail aiati..■= .: •
t.12L i SIMORIRIMMIIKIMIIMM seximiritmem
-IVO orifrkaguitaislow, RE ,,IK464 tow
__:erteigi 6.1 1
31/0—itunirreAciner -
i listamoccostsm 111EIEMeHRAERIM
f3): Elute
INDUSTRIAL ___
.7 • I • I • •
PARK ,
7.0
PP6sEP
3
Eiks.
L. 41A1,111:0-01>
its .211.-AES6ry
anal
.61,1•14
Domak. Trio
la TH I 0114
E Y E Or
..EM ETREEY
torsetkj, AIN-Tv
i imp, IM:liVhii■
111111411 111 MIME
itirive 4231,
sagoonchmu MI;
11111
leilliga
Illapm nnirdn .
inn
■P OF
1 inn 1 Al(FR
5
a)> odd
0-c-TEt1
X
t
p.60.00
.,----; ''...../ ct,„ .
,..
f ...,,,,,::!....,
4. „fio. .P;;;?4'° N. s':
4
-- 4-4.,.... P;44..."1/4. ....,:n. ■:-: 4,1
1 ; .4■1° 1::-‘s.':°°4;4C:Y424,2 4, 44.1'.;444.1,°0 777"'ci ii. i 2 ,..3 1.••• . . ,
•••■:: ' 7, , ••••■ '
0 '
L„? . ---.....
lifiT;7__ LF.4 L -"''.1 -
L.:e1c1:-°::::r,',':;yzl
• a /e
t i fi /4 .0,e
A A
-.L.' .
i -‘47-.-- 7 , • .4
I N RI
'
I .1
L. ' eq t■ 4111 1 1 F,,c,
i 1
41' t4
3 I i
c._ ....,,,, ,
. •If ; C° 'Ai d 1 4.1 t
r- - - - —/c.
.., --4--,_ , , ,,t4. !
ii:,.x...-4,- -.-t .,ii
LI -7,-----/c..,," , ' ' ../••"'412,5-
--I 1 k
,
.'Z!..;.,
w"'
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 5 D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Cindy Sherman, NAC
C. C. MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Site Plan Review for Townhomes
Highland Meadows
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/4
BACKGROUND
The report on this application was prepared for the Planning & Zoning Board by Cindy
Sherman of NAC. That report is attached. No issues arose and no significant changes to
the report were recommended by P & Z.
The P & Z approved the project as recommended, with one minor change. Condition #2
should read
2. Access to units 35 and 36 shall be provided from the north and no access shall
be provided from the cul -de -sac, subject to approval by the Police Dept. and
Fire Dept.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the site plan application with conditions as recommended in the staff report,
with the amendment to condition #2.
2. Deny the site plan application.
3. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board
FROM: Cindy Sherman /Alan Brixius
DATE: February 1, 2000
RE: Lino Lakes — Highland Meadows Multi- family Site Plan
FILE NO: 194.01 -00.01
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
On January 10, 2000 the City Council approved the amended preliminary plat
and amended PDO for the Highland Meadows subdivision. As required by the
ordinance and as one of the conditions of the approval T.S.M. Development has
submitted a complete site plan application for the townhome development. The
site plan is subject to the review of the Planning and Zoning Board for
recommendation and the approval of the City Council. The applicant has also
submitted the Final Plat for Highland Meadows West and is seeking approval for
the Final Plat to proceed.
The site is zoned R -3, Medium Density Residential and is designated for Single
Family Residential use in the City's 1990 Comprehensive Plan which was
amended to allow the attached housing.
To accommodate the development proposal, the following approval is necessary:
1. Site Plan review for the multi - family area.
2. Final Plat for Highland Meadows West.
Attached for reference:
Exhibits
A: Site location
B: Landscape Plan
C: Exterior Elevations
D: Interior Floor Plans
E: Final Plat- Highland Meadows West
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2- 595 -9636 FAX 6 1 2- 595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM
Highland Meadows
Multi - Family Site Plan
Page 2
Recommendation
NAC recommends approval of the Final Plat for Highland Meadows West and
approval of the Site Plan for Highland Meadows Multi - Family Area with the
following conditions:
1. The final landscape plan is subject to the review and approval of the City
Environmental Specialist.
a) A foundation - planting plan shall be submitted for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
b) Landscape plantings shall be added on the south side of Oak
Drive and around ponding /wetland to include native
materials /seeds as buffer areas and as part of the surface water
treatment train.
2. Access to units 35 and 36 shall be provided from the north and no access
shall be provided from the cul -de -sac.
3. Curb cuts shall be limited to 26 feet in width for accesses onto public roads
with a minimum 10 -foot separation.
4. Green space /rock separations shall be eliminated between driveways.
5. A lighting plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Police
Dept.
6. Street, drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the
City Engineer.
7. All conditions of Preliminary Plat approval remain in effect.
Issues Analysis
SITE PLAN
Site Plan Layout
The site plan layout is consistent with the approved preliminary plat with regard
to density, lot size and setbacks.
Residential Units
Each structure contains four units with two common walls in each unit. Each unit
has two exterior walls with windows and access that includes a regular door and
a patio door. Each unit has a 14'x7' concrete patio area outside the front entry
with a 4'x7' slab at the regular door access. The exterior of the units is proposed
to be a combination of vinyl lap siding with brick trim and asphalt shingles.
The buildings are all slab on grade, two -story townhome units with two
bedrooms, 1 -1 baths, kitchen, living room, dining room, and laundry area. Each
unit has an attached double garage.
•
•
Highland Meadows
Multi - Family Site Plan
Page 3
Landscaping Plan
A landscaping plan has been submitted for the general area. Plantings have
been concentrated in areas abutting existing development. No foundation
plantings have been shown but they are required and the applicant is preparing a
plan.
The ordinance requires a minimum open space of 35% and the site as proposed
provides 52% open space.
We believe that additional plantings /groundcover should be provided on the
south side of Oak Drive and surrounding the wetlands. The landscape plan is
subject to the review and approval of the City Environmental Specialist.
Access /Parking
Curb cuts or driveway access is limited to 26 feet in width. There are several
areas where this is exceeded in order to provide direct access into each unit.
The accesses should be narrowed to meet the ordinance. The accesses may be
widened outside of the right -of -way.
The ordinance requires 2'/2 spaces per unit, which is 130 parking spaces. Each
unit has two interior spaces and two exterior spaces plus 26 guest parking stalls
for a total of 234 spaces provided.
It appears that units 35 and 36 could be served by extending the drive from the
north and eliminating the access onto the cul -de -sac. This option should be
explored along with other measures to enhance access.
Drainage and Utilities
Detailed grading, drainage and utility plans have been submitted for the review
and approval of the City Engineer.
FINAL PLAT
T.S.M. Development Inc. has submitted an application for Final Plat. The
request is to plat 55 single family lots, 52 multi - family lots, a lot for common
space in the multi - family area and Outlots A -F as Highland Meadows West. The
proposed final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat.
CONCLUSION
The site plan is consistent with the general layout submitted with the preliminary
plat and it meets the intent of the ordinance regulations. The final plat is also
consistent with the approved preliminary plat. We recommend approval of the
site plan and final plat with the conditions as outlined in the recommendation
section of this report.
,•. t)r:IA:2■8ns 9N:2.1iNtt-J43
Sal.VIOOSSV
V-112:121A1
3dVOSONV-1
SMOOV3PI (1NY1H:NH
Lf)
.......
1
t I
; 1 1 i
5 I 1 1
1
I
1 .1_._._t
*
•
•
3
z
t- R
tr
0
X
X
•
•
•
till
slow..,.
1{
jAtto
Fig dna
IPT!
I
!.. 3
01
L: ,
1t ; 4.*. j I o k 1" 11 /LI- 1 +
— -...L.',:! z
7
..„; r. •::.,,\,,, • i, ;.: s,-.. - : a. ,:z
-7;- tr %, ' 1 • :1, -;.,5 71'4
•••---
47 -f ')
,1+{72 ;' I X' ; .1K
■1 `! ',._ ...
9 eli ,,ki
5.'94.2T.4.1.111. 4 ,,•1 71 .,?...r.1%,'; . . ,1/4%,:"? 5:3;74-11-1-- r., . <771 rigli • ---A.
.:..,., , e• fr........................."
-----.. di — - —71- - Li
Mr4 1 ••• N. ' .1's, I
;11. : ,1 i• .,. 1) '.4"-' 44- 1 - .1,
XV ;1
-7 • cila
5.357
1
o Is
t%!
rtii I ,
5
4.
.1!
. k31! ,7
Tli . "tt
—,
1.. -.
'coo
— \ /
... . //
4
--- L_ _
i. .71,
/ ...7, 1-,",i • , 71;7a- -.I` --- ;;577 ---- .4■,-it '
0
ea
•
•
—t
7
ij
ri
2:3
.16
•
ANA. \ f•0Ir..N1Y \t.tt\.I:l.ttlt
1
!!.1
2
;
ce,p4
5-`-;
tn '1
t.)
o
"
0
c. • —.!
c) - + ••• 1 1.••
0 -5..7.71 1 CO
o , 0..
O0 0 c) X
t--- c° LLI
LLI
6 rilLWND i1IILAP i
•
3
& 3.;
6 00
—r — –r- — 1— --T
1 I _ — sil 1 i
I
1 — 7. X- 1 .
t:•',1 I I I
I c, 11:1
1 L —1
I : GA i iLl.Y. #
NOlid3DX3 ..f2
3..1.'2 r.
.11:,';:;g;•.;
,.
00P00 3 .1,0 AS.00 N
ld I r: • I ns ••ti ".t.
.;Ss,
N01 d3333
00006 3 -St .31.00 N
Sa99 /A .16-00 S
"
trotz
3 .90.31,00 N
.57-.•■■
cpc.:•-■
COWS 3 .St .35.00 N
03
C./drbr
"%f•
00.0)9 3 ..0) .(4.00 N
31'24 A131.7"01.?*1:g
3*
00
—4
z
60.609 3 .96 ,L3.00 N
Z•ZLZ1 3 .96 .LP.00 N
Onlri,11 •
ti
<
LE 'le 'S .../1 P .11 avo Pal aVera
3
•
LZ'PL9
'1
•••
-1,4,..re • !„... ,43
N 41
1 :
: et :ts
Ja••
• V' t.
— SI!
;:ti.413'
.1iP'..ec•
5,...d;„%‘. i•
.../‘ • .1..' L''' 9'.
• . :40 .,, 41...................;,..--------‘:
I.. f.,.....0. • ...... . .
•••• ? .,.4. .1. .....
. .0.‘ .••
.....\ ••
J .41 4..4.4 + ,,,IL! .4, • .:0 • ;; ..'.
9 .4. •t•1 .r
elLK 4,4., 1'
0
0
0
(.) °
0
C •
C) • •
E ; '
o • o
—
o .7)
0 6 c-
o
.00.4
cn
0.
ti•
I— CO CO C.1
ACM J •
0
LJ
• .44 •
•Ilt.
901,6C 3 .9f .41.00 N
4
• _•••• *0
2
0c8+9 3 „ft N
• ■141.t•
LI,: • _ _ ;wt. ) tc.ro • . Iv • r.•
Dinoo
Sz I CZ
-!V 2
- 3 0 •— S
v.,
1..,
2 i 2! c• N 8
•ct..
4 , • .4: :...
li., ,...;." •
.1;:..- • .CC V. ',I.:Cr
- - ;"- .• I. tO" •Z -■•7
....4 ..-...„ .. , 40 t•
'.2. .
• ,n 8
• I.V;"-i. - to .a.c..;" 2
. t -... . :.
.2\ 7.• '
i
• r
•
1 " ,•
• • .4„:
.7 • .rr • t
:
c•1
• .4 I . .21 •
i
st sz
.40
sr
44.
c
0. C•,..r <I • •
• 7.13 -----
.7 -----
•.•
• •••
""•`""
•
k
—
c
•-•
•
.Zs .st.00 •
:I 4
It •
Ifl
4‘.
•-:..•!"' 2
2 • Z
• Memorandum
DATE: February 2, 2000
TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner
FROM: John Powell, City Enginee
RE: Highland Meadows Townho e
Review of Preliminary Plan
In addition to the comments we have provided previously with regard to the Highland
Meadows plat, please note the following:
1. The minimum pipe size for storm sewer is 15 -inch.
2. The minimum pipe size for watermain is 8 -inch.
3. The drawing scale shown in the legend on sheets 3 and 4 are incorrect. The correct scale
should illustrate a 1 " =60' scale.
4. Gate valves need to be shown on the proposed water main. Valves shall be placed
throughout the distribution system so that each portion may be isolated with the least
interruption of service. Generally, place valves at each roadway intersection or
intersection of water mains.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 5 E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Resolution 00 -29: Findings of Fact for Denial of
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review
Majestic Pines Community Church
ACTION REQUIRED: 3 / 4 vote
BACKGROUND
At the February 28 meeting, the City Council denied the applications for a conditional
use permit and site plan review for the Majestic Pines Community Church. To ensure
clarity in the City's compliance with the law, the Council should adopt findings for the
action. The attached resolution lists findings of fact.
• OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution 00 -29as written.
2. Amend Resolution 00 -29and adopt as amended.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
• Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00 -29
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CITY COUNCIL
ACTION REGARDING MAJESTIC PINES COMMUNITY CHURCH
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes received applications from Majestic Pines
Community Church for a conditional use permit and site and building plan review, and
WHEREAS, A majority vote of the City Council is required for approval of the
applications, and
WHEREAS the City Council voted on the applications at its regular meeting on February
28, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the City Council vote was two ayes and two nays, which means the project
was not approved and was thus denied.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council makes the following
findings of fact:
1. Section 2 Subd. 2.B.7. of the City's zoning ordinance provides standards for all
conditional use permits.
2. Section 5, Subd. 2.H.5. of the zoning ordinance provides additional criteria for a
conditional use permit for churches in the R -X zoning district.
3. The applicant agreed to several extensions of the review period according to law.
4. The revised application submitted February 7, 2000 was not complete, as stated in the
staff report.
5. The applicant requested a decision by the City Council on the project at the February
28, 2000 meeting.
6. A majority of the City Council does not find that the project as submitted meets the
standards for a conditional use permit, as listed in Section 2 Subd. 2.B.7. of the
zoning ordinance.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2000
•
ATTEST:
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted.
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 5F
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 - , Approve Payment No. 9 (final) and Change
Order No. 1, Lakes Addition Street Reconstruction
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority — 3/4
BACKGROUND:
The Contractor for the Lakes Addition Street Reconstruction project, Dresel
Contracting, Inc., is requesting City approval of Payment No. 9 in the amount of
$91,212.46. This will be the final payment on this contract. Upon approval of
the final payment, the one year warranty period will begin. The final amount is
about 2% over the original bid amount. The final contract amount is summarized
as follows:
Original Bid Amount
Change Order No. 1
Final Contract Amount
$ 1,787,810.00
36,439.08
$ 1,824,249.08
The final amount is about 2% over the original bid amount. The majority of the
increased cost is due to driveway and boulevard restoration work. In some
areas, additional restoration costs were incurred in an effort to blend in the new
roadway elevation with the existing yard /driveway elevations.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Approve Resolution 00 - Approving Payment No. 9 (final) and Change
Orders No. 1 for the Lakes Addition Street Reconstruction Project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution 00 - be approved.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION APPROVING PAYMENT NO. 9 (FINAL) AND CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 FOR THE LAKES ADDITION STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the construction of the Lakes Addition Street Reconstruction
Project has been completed by Dresel Contracting, Inc., and;
WHEREAS, the one -year warranty period for this project will begin with the final
payment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. Payment number 9 (final) in the amount of $91,212.46 is approved for a total
contract amount of $1,824,249.08.
2. Change Order No. 1 for $36,439.08 is approved.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2000.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed,
adopted and approved by the City Council on March 13, 2000.
Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
(UNIT PRICE CONTRACT) ,� /
NO. >
li1I/`'
OWNER: CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
LOCATION: LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
OWNER'S PROJ. NO.
ENG. PROJECT NO.
�. (r.,,
A- LINOL9716.02
CONTRACTOR DRESEL CONTRACTING INC.
24100 JULY AVENUE
CHISAGO CITY, MINNESOTA 55013
CONTRACT DATE
CONTRACT AMOUNT
CONTR. FOR LAKES ADDITION - STREET RECONSTRUCTION - STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN
APPLIC. DATE
PERIOD END.
$1,787,810.00
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
r
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
1 Mobilization
2 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter
3 Remove Pipe Sewer (Storm)
4 Remove Concrete Driveway Pavement
5 Remove Drainage Structure
6 Remove Sanitary Sewer Manhole
7 Sawing Concrete Pavement
8 Sawing Bituminous Pavement
9 Salvage Casting
10 Salvage Gate Valve Box
11 Salvage Gate Valve and Box
12 Salvage Curb Stop Box
Salvage Hydrant
Common Excavation (P)
Coarse Filter Aggregate (CV)
Topsoil Borrow (LV)
17 Dewatering for Subgrade Preparation
13
14
• 15
16
CONT. QTY. UNIT
UNIT QTY. TO DATE PRICE
L.S.
L.F.
• L.F.
S.Y.
EA
EA
L.F.
L.F.
1 1
22420
1131
880
26
1
1100
55
EA 50
EA 19
EA 2
EA 1
EA 25
C.Y. 39000
C.Y. 15535
C.Y. 1600
L.S. 1
PAGE 1 OF 4 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
96
TOTAL
$37,000.00
$1.00
$7.00
$2.00
$250.00
$300.00
$1.90
$1.50
$150.00
$250.00
$300.00
$75.00
$500.00
$3.65
$30.00
$9.50
$15,000.00
2/7s.-2,ev
76
/3 5iO
/yamX/ 7o
RD, 035 56)
0
18
• 19
20
Subgrade Preparation
Geotextile Fabric, Type II (Modified)
Water for Dust Control
21 Aggregate Base, Class 5 (100% Crushed)
22 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture
23 Type 31 Base Course Mixture
24 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
25 Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation
26 Common Laborer
27 Backhoe w /Operator
28 Truck w /Operator
29 Skid Loader w /Operator
30 .. 12" RCP Apron w/Trash Guard
31 15" RCP Apron w/Trash Guard
32 Clean Storm Sewer
33 4" PE Corrugated Perforated Pipe Drain
22' Span RC Pipe - Arch Sewer, CI. IV
28' Span RC Pipe - Arch Sewer, Cl. IV
12' RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006, CL V
15' RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006, Cl. V
38 18' RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006, Cl. V
39 21' RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006, CI. V
40 24' RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006, Cl. V
41 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
42 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL 402
43 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL 406-48
44 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL 406 -60
45 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL 406 -72
46 Construct Drainage Structure, Design X
Casting Assembly R- 1642 -B w /Infi - Shield
Casting Assembly R -3067 w /Infi - Shield
Casting Assembly R- 3250 -A w /Infi - Shield
Adjust LP Catch Basin
51 Random Rip Rap, Class III
34
35
36
37
47
48
•::
RD STA
S.Y.
M GAL
T
T
T
GAL
T
HR
HR
HR
HR
EA
EA
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
EA
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
EA
EA
EA
EA
C.Y.
PAGE 2 OF 4 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
113
98084
150
18080
3435
5475
1810
535
10
10
10
10
2
1
900
8655
170
141
249
1329
7/3
W, 55
�9 &r,64//
yaa /, K
4.6 -0
/0? '6
75/
v
445
P9
3103
/�3 c
79 //?
30 60
/3
R3
793
11
22
114
/3/„z
3 g,7
5 c/,72
,,7.5
7 2
35
2 02
41
26
21
25
$100.00
$1.25
$25.00
/S, /3
$8.80 L24_2&
$25.70 /7 Cke" S�
$21.00 //t
$1.40 c2/ 020
$15.00 ,,,;?,E,65'
9o0
dd
//46`)°
$2.75 /333 2'
4 5 -g6° 5
7„R/-26.-
„ /26
$54.00 ZpY02.Dd
�.5 77) 73
656.0
1 7c704
3c
v27.e. do
/5666'°
73/,26-(-)
$510.00 / pS-U°()
58e
3a'6°
/(0,..606r
$40.00
$100.00
$48.00
$65:0
$550.00
$635.00
$5.25
$39.25
$19.00
$21.00
$22.75
$26.00
$29.00
$300.00
$190.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$225.00
$375.00
$460.00
$150.00
$65.00
52
53
54
Geotextile Filter, Type IV (Storm)
Adjust Frame & Ring Casting w /Infi - Shield
Reconstruct Sanitary Manhole w /Infi - Shield
55 Cut and Plug Existing Water Main
56 Connect to Existing Water Main
57 Cut -In & Connect to Existing 12" Water Main
58 Install Salvaged Hydrant
59 6" x 6" Wet Tap Connection
60 F & 1 6" Gate Valve and Box
61 F & 110' Gate Valve and Box
62 F & 112" Gate Valve and Box
63 F & I Cast Iron Gate Valve Box
64 - F & I HDPE Gate Valve Box w /Plated Steel Stem
65 6' Water Main Ductile Iron, Cl. 52
10' Water Main, Ductile Iron, Cl. 52
12' Water Main, Ductile Iron, CI. 52
2" Polystyrene Insulation.
DIP Water Main Fittings
70 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Design 8618
71 6' Concrete Driveway Pavement
72 Traffic Control
73 Bale Check
74 Silt Fence, Preassembled
75 Seeding
76 Seed Mixture 500
77 Mulch Material, Type I
78 Disk Anchoring
79 Sodding, Type Lawn
80 Commercial Fertilizer Analysis 10 -10 -10
81 F & 14" PVC Schedule 40
66
67
• 68
69
S.Y.
EA
L.F.
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
S.Y.
LB
L.F.
S.Y.
L.S.
EA
L.F.
AC
LB
T
AC
S.Y.
LB
L.F.
PAGE 3 OF 4 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
62
32
65
7/
33
J,?, 92
3
435
l
10 /c2
8 6
2385 p V/0
to
mi5
880 /55, , 6
1
1
24
1
24
1
1
35
10
2150
1625
22420
1
50 l/^^�j
1000 /LPL/ O(-)
1
40
2
1
`n
15000
80 ,,
1000 0/
$2.50
$225.00
$170.00
$600.00
$600.00
$1,300.00
$400.00
$1,300.00
$700.00
$1,100.00
$1,300.00
$195.00
$425.00
$30.00
$22.00
$40.00
$7.58
$1.90
$6.00
$27.80
$10,000.00
$6.00
$2.00
$325.00
$3.50
$250.00
$74.00
7/a. ov
�� -mod
/'Oc)66
/300'
/4 ° °
/306"
/6, eOd °�
/3d
L3VOd(D
,36,22o4'°
$1.49 ,1V/ 5 / 7(Y
$3.50
$6.00
Application For Payment - continued
Total Contract Amount: $ 1.787 810 00 Total Amount Earned $ /7/7/,5-"Y,(k
i
"'Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incorporated into Work $
Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $
Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $
Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $
GROSS AMOUNT DUE $
LESS 0 % RETAINAGE $
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $
s c,
/7,?/0 'ifUc�
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATION $
AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION
Contractor's Affidavit
The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress payments
received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to above have been applied
by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the undersigned incurred in connection with work covered
by prior Applications for Payment under said contract, and (2) all materials and equipment incorporated in said
Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims,
security interests and encumbrances.
Dated / 19 i7 Dresel Contracting Inc.
COUNTY OF 1/-cV.dee
STATE OF
SS
(Contractor)
By: /..e
(Name and Title)
Before me oo this 14 . day of , 19 i personally appeared /2a''- .
kn n to me, who being my sworn, did depose and say that he is the
of the Contractor mentioned above; that he executed the above Application for
(Office)
Payment , is Al'•.VI .p
correct a
My Com
half
aid Contractor; and that all of the statements contained therein are true,
IetHERYL BENaTSON
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
1IltEAran. Exp. Jan. 31, 20001
(Notary Pu )
The undersigned has checked the Contractor's Application for Payment shown above. A part of this Application
is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this'Contract have been applied by him
to discharge in full all of his obligations in connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment.
In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the Amount Due.
•
Date By
Page 4 of 4 LINOL9716.02
SHORT E TT HENDRICKSON INC.
•
"Revised" CHANGE ORDER
3535 Vadnais Center Drive, 200 SEH Center, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5118 651.490.2000 800.325.2055 651.490.2150 FAX
City of Lino Lakes January 31, 2000
OWNER DATE
1
OWNER'S PROJECT NO. CHANGE ORDER NO.
Lakes Addition - Street Reconstruction, Storm Sewer & Water Main A- LINOL9716.02
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEH FILE NO.
The following changes shall be made to the contract documents:
Description: See "Revised" Change Order No. 1 Attachment
Purpose of Change Order: See "Revised" Change Order No. 1 Attachment
Basis of Cost: ® Actual
❑ Estimated
Attachments (list supporting documents) See "Revised" Change Order No. 1 Attachment
Contract Status Time Cost
Original Contract $1,787,810.00
Net Change Prior C.O.'s 0 to 0
Change this C.O. 36,439.08
Revised Contract $1,824,249.08
Recommended for Approval: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. by
//- David C. Hahn, ct Manager
Agreed to by Contractor: Approved for Owner:
BY Dresel Contracting Inc. BY City of Lino Lakes
• .,-
TILE
TITLE
Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Office 1
\\ cpu42\c om kloc \pmjects\kNinol\9716\02\co# 1.doc
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
9/99
Offices located throughout the Upper Midwest • Equal Opportunity Employer
We help you plan, design, and achieve
ATTACHMENT
Im•
0
cc
w g
o •
cc =
0
0 2 g
z E
< 1: `,`?:
ocu
u? E
-o
4) •1c
.2 Cs
> ) •••• 0 o
.6- -
0) rEoZ
• r,
= r) 0)
January 27, 2000
tr. Of;
t,,-;
22,420.00:'; 22,761.00
8
,
8
1,760.005 2,846.00
6,500.001: , 6,750.00
8
10
8
'.•,-,-
,
8
8
• -.
8
'ttii
7,500.00 7,500.00
4,750.001 4,750.00
8
8
6
8
,
8
wi
N.
12,500.00 ;: 13,500.00
142,350.00 144, 437.80
466,050.00 1 458,640.00
15,200.00:1 20,035.50
8
6
8
6
8
8
(7
_
.._
8
8
—
Percent
Over /Under
0%
e
0
6
e
0
—
e
U3
5
e
0
,..,-,
e
CU
,,-,
e
0
g
_
e
0
..1,
74.5%
e•ee
0
6
,../
6
0
6
a
eee
0
6
0
6
0
.-
g
','
e
01.
F.,
e
0
g
e
a
0
Percent
of B.P.Q.
100%
g
70-
'.1;
G
g
g
8
174.5%
%•001
g
6
g
8
5
98.4%
73
1 %00
g
--1
-1
LE
SY
x
g
EACH
J
LF
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
x
g
1)
o
CY
LS
2
22761
1253
1423
c':,
0,4
cn
"
.-
''',
39572
15288
8
.
c,
•-
F.. (:):i
LS
LF
LF
›-
co
EACH
EACH
LI-
_,
U-
,
EACH
EACH
2
0
EACH
2
0
CY
CY
›-
0
CO
-J
2
.-
22420
(7
8
26
0011
39000
.,_
Mobilization
(Normal Variation)
Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
(Actual Measured /lengthened project as per Dave Ahrens])
Remove Storm Sewer
(Actual Measured)
Remove Concrete Drive
(Actual Measured /lengthened driveways to meet grade requirements!)
Remove Drainage Structure
(Extra storm structure not shown on plan)
Remove Sanitary Structure
(Removed extra structure as requested by City staff)
Sawing Concrete Pavement
(Actual Measured)
Sawing Bituminous Pavement
(Actual Measured /Additional sawing at Birch Street to match existing])
Salvage Castings
(Normal Variation)
Salvage Gate Valve Box
(Normal Variation)
Salvage Gate Valve and Box
(Valves were not salvageable)
Selvage Curb Stop Box
(Normal Variation)
Salvage Hydrant
(Removed extra hydrants not shown m plan and requested removal by City staff)
Common Excavation
(Additional excavation due to lengthening project as requested by City staff)
Coarse Filter Aggregate
(Underrun die to additional Class 5 aggregate to protect from damaging fabric during curb
placement)
Topsoil Borrow
(Additional material used to maintain reasonable grades on boulevard areas)
Dewatering for Subgrade
(Not needed - exposed existing pert. Pipe behind curb which was not connected to structures)
Subgrade Preparation
(Normal Variation)
cv
el
•r
41
(0
n
03
o,
0
•,:
"
,_
co
.-
Short Elliott Hendrickson
January 27, 2000
l'
122, 605.00 118,193.75
3,750.00`; 2,100.00
ii
,.5.
ei
,
0
4
o
—
88,279.501 107,988.58
ii
a
a
O
8
...
..,,,
—
2,534.001 2,321.20
ii
N
8
.
N
, 6
a
8
1,000.00;, 2,700.00
o
8
6
8
6
8
635.00;:;: 1,270.00
2,475.00K: 1,333.75
ii
45.438.75':: 49580.25
6,672.50:;; 7,261.25
ii
7,614.00;:; 6.426.00
4,731.00 6,897.00
27, 909.00 ; #: 25, 972.00
Percent
Over /Under
0%
o
C'
0
a
oi
223%
3.0%
o
%0'0L1
%0'00l-
o
6
a
6
.v.
.
45.8%.
Percent
of B.P.Q.
100%
.
0
.
—
8
—
'07,
.
—
88
—
84.4%
92.7%
(M) GAL
TON
z
0
I-
TON
GAL
TON
HOUR
cc
0
0
HOUR
x
7
0
EACH
EACH
LF
LF
LF
:
94555
..
CO
8
.4.
5636
8
..1.
N
N
N
N
.-
$.
(M) GAL
Z
Z
0
I-
TON
Z
HOUR
D
HOUR
HOUR
EACH
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
18080
.
4
0
535
8655
141
—
*
x
K
r.
'
=
21.
1.=.' ,
0 o
Water for Dust Control
(Actual Measured) ,
Aggregate Base Class 5
(Additional length for driveways to meet grades and lengthened proied)
Type 41 Bituminous Wear
(Additional length and depths of driveways to match existing drives and reasonable grades.
Additional length of protect as requested by City staff to correct drainage problems)
Type 31 Bituminous Base
(Additional length of proied as requested by Cdr staff to correct drainage problems)
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
(Normal Variation)
Crushed Rock Pipe Foundation
/Suitable material at nine zone: no correction material needed)
1
O
).. 8 91
Badrhoe with Operator
(Excavation and back NI for repair non- workina water valves)
Truck with Operator
(No material removed from site)
Skid Loader with Operator
(Not used as estimated) •
17 RCP Apron with Trash Guard
(Normal Variation)
15" RCP Apron with Trash Guard
(Replaced existing damaoed apron) _
Clean Storm Sewer
(Some existina aloes were leaned' not needed)
22' RCP Span Pipe
(Normal Variation)
28" RCP Span Pipe
(Final Measurement)
17 RCP Sewer
(Placed 12" RCP rnplace on 15" RCP for cover)
15" RCP Sewer
(Placed 12" RCP inpface of 15"RCP for cover)
I
T
8
&
0,
N
23
N
CONNO
'0
M
0
34
0)
T
37
0_
Short Elliott Hendrickson
ATTACHMENT
cc
.2
CC
o •
LL.I g
(.5 2
Z �0 =
< t ID
.65
E
0
oz
13 :a-
d)
.(n 0 -0 —
5, cn c;
E z
cn
January 27, 2000
!,:::::::::::::::::::::.:
......
1,797.25 ;i 2,570.75
20, 618.00 ' 20,696 00
.-
:::,.:::'-';k::::
8
i'702:
3,300.00;; 3,900.00
4,180.00':;: 4,370.00
22,800.00:;:; 26,840.00
750.00;:; 925.00
8
8
n_
9,225.00 7,312.50
9,750.00;:; 9,750.00
r!::::::::::::::::::
8
ci
8
0-
•--
:::::::2:2;:!.!
8
g
ci
::::::::::::::::::=
8
1,625.00 1,625.00
:::;::::•-:::
8
7,200.00 7,425.00
06"966'9 00'080'H.
00008' l fS 00'002' t
8
..0
• -d ',73
ct
0
43.0%
il
O
g
g
18.2%
,-..
,-:
23.3%
0
4
r-
6
c■'
g
6
e
o
,.;,-
0
cri
;,,,
0
0
z,-..
0
0
;-.•
oi
e
6
0
0
�
o
::
,
0 a,
,- 03
e
-.?.
8
.-
g
g
0
8
--,..'
an
2
79.3%
-e.
,
,1•-•
'6,-
LF
LF
LF
EACH
LF
LF
—I
LF
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
SY
EACH
J
EACH
EACH
8
17- C 5.•
134
WI
5 ..,.:...,
Y. 0 ;.•
...I
1.1_
J
L.
.....1
EACH
u_
J
LF
LF
EACH
EACH
EACH
SY 1
EACH
LF
EACH
EACH
gll
1611
26
Description ....... . . . ........................... . . . ......... . .. . ..
18' RCP Sewer
(Additional pipe need for connection to burled manhole not shown on plan)_
21' RCP Sewer
(Normal Venation) -
24' RCP Sewer
(Placed 24-RCP inplace of 28-RCP span for cover)
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
( Additional connections due to buried perf pipe on East Shadow Lake Drive)
Drainage Structure, Design LL402
(Normal Variation)
Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -48
(Field changes due to pipe revisions and pipe cover]
Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -60
(Final Measurements)
Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -72
(Final Measurements)
Drainage Structure, Design X
(Changes from Design X to Design LL40648)
Casting Assembly F11642B
(Normal Variation)
Casting Assembly R3067
(Normal Variation)
Casting Assembly R3250A
(Field Change from R3067)
Adjust, LP Catch Basin
(Normal Variation)
E2
Rr
. tz ...
Geo -Tex Filter Fabric
(Final Measurements)
Adjust Frame and Ring Casting
(Normal Variation)
Reconstruct Sanitary Manhole
(Final Measurements)
ot
c
-2-
Z. g
55
d ,?_
Connect to Existing Water Man
(Normal Variation)
Item
38
46
L*",--
8
FII
8
5
8
8
54
8
oz,
0
Short Elliott Hendrickson
ATTACHMENT
0
CC
LIJ
cc E
o
w g .5. +9,
z `81
•ct 04
o
o
0
3 2
:0' -J
• *Zi E z
cr x
• _9 .6 IcLni
January 27, 2000
EZ 0
•
• •
•:::::',:,:::::.::::,:•.:::::
1,300.03
0
2
7.::::::::::::::::,,t
8
ci
t o
oi.
1,300.00 1,300.00
16,800.00 16,800.00
1,100.00 .`•: 1,100.00
.--
:::::::::::::::::::,
8
ci
8
1,950.00;; 2,340.00
3,400.00 3,400.00
;'i
1,050.00 480.00
52,470.00 53,020.00
ii
8
v
°
,
3,087.505; 1,928.50
134,520.00 ?;j 132,324.00
ei
24,464.00;:; 43,162.28
10,000.00:;; 10,000.00
0.001 0.00
2,000.00:;; 200.00
325.00 325.00
Percent
Over /Under
0%
O
ci
4.2%
o
0
0
0
a
ci
0
0
o
0
a
ci
a
4
.1
0
o
0
0
us
.-
0
6
a
O
L-
i
e
o
0
e
0
Percent
of B.P.Q.
100%
b,
l's
45.7%
!-e•
.-
e
8
e
62.5 %
ee
v.
6
eee
°
a
ci
e
EACH
EACH
1
0
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
LL
tL
LF
LBS
LL
AS
LS
EACH
LF
ACRE
2410
220541
5 z,,.:
F. a;
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
LF
LBS
LF
LS
EACH
LF
ACRE
•.-
224201,
8801
50
000
o
Cut-In and Connect to Existing Water Main
(Normal Variation)
Installed Salvaged Hydrant
(Installed hydrant on Crystal Court to satisfy homeowner)
6" x 6" Wet Tap including 6" Gate Valve
(Normal Variation)
Furnish and Install 6" Gate Valve and Box
(Normal Variation)
Fumish and Install 10' Gate Valve and Box
(Normal Variation)
Furnish and Install 12" Gate Valve and Box
(Normal Variation)
Fumish and Install Cast Iron Gate Valve Box
(Install extra valve boxes outside of street area as requested by City stain_
Fumish and Install HDPE Gate Valve Box
(Normal Variation)
6" DIP Class 52 Water Main
(Final Measurement)
.
E E
12" DIP Class 52 Water Main
(Normal Variation)
2' Poly Insulation
(Lower water main to dear sewer services and insulation not needed)
DIP Water Main Fittings
(Used fittings as needed)
Concrete Curb and Gutter, Type B618
(Normal Variation)
6" Concrete Driveway
(Lengthened driveways to meet grade requirements and water valve repairs)
Traffic Control
(Normal Variation)
Bale Check
(Not Needed)
Silt Fence
(Used as Needed) _
Seedng
(Normal Variation)
57
64
'I,'
70
73
74
P
Short Elliott Hendrickson
2
Lu
0
ct
January 27, 2000
".;
8
M)
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
$1,824,348.48
O
d
0 •
t
0- "6
8
8
z
0
—
co
0
10
z
0
8
Furnish and Install 4" P.E. Schedule 40
(Used only as needed and requested by Citsta[j
2
"Revised" CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ATTACHMENT Total:
Short Elliott Hendrickson
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 5G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 13, 2000
TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 - , Consideration of Petition for Public
Improvements in the Bluebill Ponds Area.
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City has received a petition from the owners of the property shown on the
attached sketch. This is the property included in the preliminary plat for Bluebill
Ponds. The petition requests sanitary sewer, water, street, and drainage
improvements.
The location of the entrance to this subdivision has not yet been resolved. The
developer and House of Praise church have not yet reached agreement on the
purchase of the property across from Wood Duck Trail on the south side of Main
Street. As you may recall, it is City staff's strong recommendation that the
entrance to this subdivision be located directly across from Wood Duck Trail. If
this issue is not resolved, and the City proceeds with the Public Improvement
process, it is very likely we would need to condemn the church property in order
to construct the requested improvements.
It is City Staff's recommendation this petition be denied as premature.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 00- , Denying the Petition for Public Improvements in
the Bluebill Ponds Area.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 00- be adopted.
• Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A REPORT ON PUBLIC
IMPROVMENTS TO SERVE THE BLUEBILL PONDS AREA.
WHEREAS, a request has been received for a report on public improvements to serve
the Bluebill Ponds area, and
WHEREAS, the City considers this request for improvements as premature,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The request to prepare a report on Public Improvements to serve the Bluebill Ponds
area is denied.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of March, 2000.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and
approved by the City Council on March 13, 2000.
Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk
•
•
Memorandum
TO: Mayor Bergeson and City Council Members
FROM: John Powell, City Engineer
DATE: March 10, 2000
RE: Agenda Item 5G - Bluebill Ponds Petition
At the Planning and Zoning meeting held Wednesday evening, March 8, 2000,
the developer of Bluebill Ponds granted a 60 day extension to the deadline for
consideration of their plat. For this reason, City staff recommends no action be
taken at this time on the petition for public improvements to serve the Bluebill
Ponds plat. Therefore, Item 5G has been removed from the agenda for the
March 13, 2000, City Council meeting.
•
•
I 11'1101P91
MAIM
;mem
quww-_,d
mannui
11.. .1ri
op*
.; wpm
M14.
ErCHOTOr
ION El
;01% 11160,,;
14
11 1
mmingims
LINO LAKES
1_
REHABILITATION CENTER
11111111111
•
2 3 4
11
TN( CI.. CO
1ST. 407l1.11
AFIRIP,„riPaFWAIT
tratirm.
FP al"
54 a-
g „
MARSHAN LAKE
•
•
•
AFENDA ITEM 5 H
Memorandum
TO: Mayor Bergeson and City Council Members
FROM: John Powell, City Engineer \
DATE: March 10, 2000
RE: Wenzel Farms / Hugo Proposal
The timing of the proposed Elmcrest Avenue right -of -way vacation and Joint
Powers Agreement for water service to serve Wenzel Farms must be
coordinated with the City of Hugo in order to protect Lino Lakes interests. We
should not proceed with action on these items without some assurance from the
City of Hugo that they would proceed likewise. We may even want to delay
action until the City of Hugo has completed vacation of their portion of Elmcrest
Avenue.
I will develop a schedule for these City Council actions with the City Attorney to
ensure Lino Lakes interests are protected. No action will be taken at the
March 13, 2000, meeting. I spoke to the developer about this matter and he did
not object to delaying City Council action.