Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/24/2000 Council Packet
AGENDA UPDATED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday July 24, 2000 6:30 P.M. - Call to Order and Roll Call - Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) June 26, 2000, Council Meeting Minutes ii) July 5, 2000, Council Work Session Minutes iii) July 10, 2000, Council Meeting Minutes B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) July 24, 2000 (Check No. 59397 — 59498 in the amount of $233,461.70) ii) Centennial Fire District C) Consideration of not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per MN Statute 466.04 2 Open Mike A) National Night Out Proclamation, Kent Strege 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) MRST READING, Ordinance No. 11 -00, Open Burning, (3/5 Vote Required) Milo Bennett B) FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 12 -00, Adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, (3/5 Vote Required) Milo Bennett Page 1 • AGENDA 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner 7. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A) PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions, (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell B) Minor Subdivision for David Snell, 600 62nd Street (3/5 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland C) Final Plat and Developers Agreement, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser D) PUBLIC HEARING — First reading, Ordinance No. 17 -99, Easement Vacation, Oak Brook Peninsula, John Powell (Continue Until December 11, 2000, 3/5 Vote Required to Continue) E) Resolution No. 00 -73, Receive Feasibility Report and Call Hearing on Improvement, Main Street Trunk Utilities (3/5 Vote Required) John Powell •8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, July 24, through August 14, 2000: A) Monday, July 24, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting B) Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting C) Tuesday, August 1, 2000, 7:00 —10:00 p.m., National Night Out D) Wednesday, August 2, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Special Council Work Session E) Thursday, August 3, 2000, 7:00 a.m., EDAC F) Thursday, August 3, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting G) Wednesday, August 9, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session H) Wednesday, August 9, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Planning and Zoning Meeting I) Thursday, August 10, 2000, 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Safety Camp • 11. Adjourn Revised 7/21/00 rdg 8:00 pm Page 2 • EXPENDITURES JULY 24 2000 • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:44:02 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (A) Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 07242000 - 07242000 Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 2 120.96 120.96 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 2 574.79 574.79 .00 .00 000094 PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. 1 40,829.53 40,829.53 .00 .00 000106 US WEST 1 2,132.74 2,132.74 .00 .00 000111 GLEWWE DOORS, INC. 2 287.99 287.99 .00 .00 000144 WHITE BEAR LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 80.00 80.00 .00 .00 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 4.26 4.26 .00 .00 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 2 184.00 184.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 29.19 29.19 .00 .00 000219 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING, INC. 2 372.61 372.61 .00 .00 011110 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 271.00 271.00 .00 .00 000262 MITEL COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 310.00 310.00 .00 .00 000299 CENTERVILLE REDI -MIX, INC. 1 199.69 199.69 .00 .00 000337 CASSIDY, TOM 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000338 IRLBECK, BOB 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000341 JUERGENS, BILL 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000344 KUEHL, DEB 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000345 LEE, THOMAS 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000346 MEIDT, CHRISTOPHER 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000347 MORTENSON, DAN 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000348 MONTGOMERY, GREG 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:44:04 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 09 NADEAU, SANDY 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000351 NEWVILLE, GREG 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000352 SPIESS, BRIDGET 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000353 STEFFES, JIM 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000354 SWENSON, DAVE 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000355 SMITH, DONITA 1 48.00 48.00 .00 .00 000356 TURCH, STEVE 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 000357 SCHULL,COLLEEN 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00 000358 GRAPHIC DESIGN, INC. 1 1,050.00 1,050.00 .00 .00 000703 BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC. 1 12.78 12.78 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 844.47 844.47 .00 .00 000927 CARLSON, DONNA 1 45.82 45.82 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 2 2,142.00 2,142.00 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 001054 CENTERVILLE FLORAL 1 36.95 36.95 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 O. CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 46.86 46.86 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2 3,051.48 3,051.48 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 241.80 241.80 .00 .00 001267 CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC. 1 68.89 68.89 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 318.21 318.21 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 4 7,259.50 7,259.50 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 1,736.60 1,736.60 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 678.86 678.86 .00 .00 001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 634.74 634.74 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 1 52.00 52.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:44:06 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 0111/17 FOREST LAKE AREA 1 1,925.00 1,925.00 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 850.70 850.70 .00 .00 001559 FRANCIS, LINDA 1 269.93 269.93 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 1,089.10 1,089.10 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 97.04 97.04 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 15.92 15.92 .00 .00 001967 INTOXIMETERS, INC. 1 121.36 121.36 .00 .00 001970 INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC. 1 54.25 54.25 .00 .00 002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 16.15 16.15 .00 .00 002248 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & CO., LLP 1 26,295.00 26,295.00 .00 .00 002331 LEHMAN, MIKE - LED STETSON 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002340 LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 1 982.68 982.68 .00 .00 002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 91.48 91.48 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 44,518.00 44,518.00 .00 .00 01110 MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 2 93.58 93.58 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 275.09 275.09 .00 .00 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 3,324.00 3,324.00 .00 .00 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 6,432.14 6,432.14 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 607.28 607.28 .00 .00 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 4 12,850.71 12,850.71 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 226.09 226.09 .00 .00 003483 PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC. 1 2,400.00 2,400.00 .00 .00 003500 PHOTO WORLD, INC. 2 226.71 226.71 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 1,212.20 1,212.20 .00 .00 • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:44:11 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 00k RUMPSA, MIKE 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 319.00 319.00 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 713.39 713.39 .00 .00 003916 SAWYER, CHERYL 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 8,286.56 8,286.56 .00 .00 004012 SILVERA, SHAWN 1 271.81 271.81 .00 .00 004040 SMITH, PEG 1 73.12 73.12 .00 .00 004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 2,160.94 2,160.94 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 8,085.92 8,085.92 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 13 36,864.45 36,864.45 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 148.42 148.42 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 505.64 505.64 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 452.20 452.20 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 702.02 702.02 .00 .00 011111 WAITE SMITH, LINDA 1 164.85 164.85 .00 .00 004803 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 660.40 660.40 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 264.25 264.25 .00 .00 900006 TURNQUIST, TIM 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 900256 HART, TERRANCE 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 900344 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900438 SCOTT OLMSTEAD BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900573 FERRENCE, LAURIE 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 29.07 29.07 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 133 233,461.70 233,461.70 .00 .00* • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:49:56 Operator: JAL . Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 1062 - 1062 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description 0 CASSIDY, TOM 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 FERRENCE, LAURIE 0 HART, TERRANCE 0 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 0 IRLBECK, BOB 0 JUERGENS, BILL 0 KUEHL, DEB 0 LEE, THOMAS O MAC MAY HOMES 0 MEIDT, CHRISTOPHER O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT 0 MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOP O MINNESOTA STATE TREASU O MN. DEPT OF HEALTH III 0 MONTGOMERY, GREG 0 MORTENSON, DAN O NADEAU, SANDY O NEWVILLE, GREG 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN 0 SCHULL,COLLEEN 0 SCOTT OLMSTEAD BUILDER 0 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF O SMITH, DONITA O SPIESS, BRIDGET O STEFFES, JIM 0 SWENSON, DAVE O T.K.D.A. O TURCH, STEVE O TURNQUIST, TIM • REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6471 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /47 ELM * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** JUNE SAC /AUGUST SEWER CH * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6665 C * * * * * * ** QUARTERLY QUARTERLY REIMBURSE REIMBURSE REIMBURSE SURCHARGE STATE FEE PROGRAM REC PROGRAM REC PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM EEC ADVERTISING REIMBURSE PROGRAM * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** REC * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7737 M * * * * * * ** QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC MUN ENGINEER /HIGHLAND ME * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC • * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 201 ADULT IN 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING ADULT SP Amount 7.00 960.08 7.00 7.00 500.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 500.00 7.00 15,146.00 500.00 6,432.14 3,324.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 25.00 39.90 22.00 500.00 8,286.56 48.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 21,926.86 7.00 7.00 58,322.54* 95.00 95.00* 95.00 Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:49:57 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Chec # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 202 95.00* 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES •0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SENIORS 12.03 0 SMITH, PEG MILEAGE SENIORS 73.12 Total for Dept 406 85.15* OTHER 24.43 Total for Dept 204 24.43* 0 SAWYER, CHERYL STORYTELLER SPECIAL 300.00 Total for Dept 205 300.00* 0 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 184.00 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. GIFT CERTIFICATE YOUTH IN 50.00 0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI SAFETY CAMP REGISTRATION YOUTH IN 60.00 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING YOUTH IN 190.00 0 AN CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 356.41 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. T -BALL PHOTOS YOUTH IN 702.02 Total for Dept 207 1,542.43* 0 CARLSON, DONNA MILEAGE MAYOR /CO 45.82 0 CENTERVILLE FLORAL FLORAL ARRANGEMENT MAYOR /CO 36.95 O PERSONNEL DECISIONS, I PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAYOR /CO 2,400.00 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 5 MAYOR /CO 361.76 0 WAITE SMITH, LINDA BOOKS /PARKING /MEALS MAYOR /CO 149.85 Total for Dept 401 2,994.38* 0 D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST 241.80 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 77.00 0 FRANCIS, LINDA MILEAGE /TUITION /BOOK /CAB ADMINIST 15.96 0 OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINIST 119.61 0 WAITE SMITH, LINDA BOOKS /PARKING /MEALS ADMINIST 15.00 Total for Dept 402 469.37* O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 57.76 0 FRANCIS, LINDA MILEAGE /TUITION /BOOK /CAB FINANCE 232.68 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR PREP OF COMP ANNUAL FIN FINANCE 26,295.00 0 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT F REGISTRATION /A ROLEK FINANCE 200.00 0 OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 106.48 Total for Dept 407 26,891.92* 0 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSO MEMBERSHIP /J SMYSER PLANNING 271.00 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING 96.26 O T.K.D.A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 97.39 Total for Dept 416 464.65* 0 A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE 67.29 0 BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC CAR WASH POLICE 12.78 0 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI ROLL OF STAMPS POLICE 33.00 O CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CAR WASHES POLICE 46.86 • Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:49:57 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description Dept Amount CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M ECM PUBLISHERS, INC FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN GLEWWE DOORS, INC. GRAPHIC DESIGN, INC. INTOXIMETERS, INC. KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. NORTHERN STATES POWER, PHOTO WORLD, INC. RUMPSA, MIKE SAM'S CLUB, INC. SHRED -IT, INC. SILVERA, SHAWN STATE OF MINNESOTA VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE ADVERTISING CLINIC CHARGES PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE SERVICE CALL DARE T- SHIRTS PARTS STANDARD PACK PRINTING SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE FILM DEVELOPING POST LICENSE SUPPLIES DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE POST LICENSE /VOICE RECOR CONNECT CHARGES MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE WHITE BEAR LAKE POLICE SEMINAR /K RAUSCH Total for Dept 420 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING O FRANCIS, LINDA MILEAGE /TUITION /BOOK /CAB BUILDING O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING Total for Dept 422 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. CONTRACTOR /1999 SEALCOAT STREETS PHOTO WORLD, INC. FILM DEVELOPING STREETS T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT STREETS T.K.D.A. MUN ENGINEER /SEALCOAT STREETS WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STREETS Total for Dept 430 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU O BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. O CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES 0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 0 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CABLE, PARK BRAKE DIESEL PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET 0 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI REPAIR MOBILE UNIT #240 FLEET 10.65 204.49 634.74 52.00 39.93 45.53 157.99 1,050.00 121.36 16.15 317.96 53.80 3.14 155.12 45.00 329.34 54.95 271.81 390.00 452.20 80.00 4,646.09* 31.29 31.29* 38.50 21.29 2,160.94 2,220.73* 398.59 82.11 121.55 8.84 3,043.30 40,829.53 25.31 8,085.92 269.04 660.40 53,524.59* 6.18 837.05 68.89 7,259.50 850.70 94.47 172.61 Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:49:58 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept 0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH PARTS /SUPPLIES Total for Dept 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T & T ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY DALCO, INC. DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN GLEWWE DOORS, INC. LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MITEL COMMUNICATIONS S MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 'JANITORIAL SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME SERVICE FRONT ENTRY DOOR GOVERNME PRINTING SERVICE GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME BACKLIT GOVERNME FREQUENCY SHARING CHARGE GOVERNME NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 432 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE O ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN LAWN ROLLER RENTAL 0 CENTERVILLE REDI -MIX, CONCRETE /FIBER 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES O HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA GOPHER GETTER O INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC CEMENT 111/1 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, MARKING PAINT O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE O NATURE CALLS, INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE 0 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT O US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 450 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES RECREATI LEHMAN, MIKE LED STE PERFORMANCE IN THE PARK/ RECREATI LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN PRINTING SERVICE RECREATI MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE PHOTO WORLD, INC. FILM DEVELOPING SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Total for Dept 451 RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK BOA Total for Dept 452 Amount 148.42 9,437.82* 53.67 440.94 1,167.02 318.21 678.86 103.44 51.51 130.00 506.41 114.44 310.00 200.00 7,049.50 17.66 1,959.82 13,101.48* 133.85 4.26 199.69 25.21 123.17 355.65 15.92 54.25 91.48 8.84 122.28 607.28 101.73 92.49 113.57 2,049.67* 19.25 16.87 500.00 158.31 8.84 46.28 9.98 171.76 931.29* 3.86 3.86* Date: 07/18/2000 Time: 12:49:59 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 28 Total for Dept 461 O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU O BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 0 C. W. HOULE, INC. O CONNEXUS ENERGY O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O US WEST SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPAIR HYDRANT VALVE MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE PARTS /SUPPLIES CONTAINER DEMURRAGE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE ADVERTISING MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JUNE SAC /AUGUST SEWER O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY S 0 FOREST LAKE AREA O FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, 0 T.K.D.A. • NEW SERVICE /BEHM'S APRIL -JUNE SERVICE JU LAND PURCHASE IN ADVERTISING MUN ENGINEER /APOLLO Total for Dept 499 ENVIRONM 4.42 ENVIRONM 143.88 148.30* SOLID WA 319.00 319.00* WATER 23.01 WATER 7.42 WATER 2,142.00 WATER 923.19 WATER 17.32 WATER 332.76 WATER 10.00 WATER 4.42 WATER 38.37 WATER 1,657.01 WATER 521.55 WATER 59.35 5,736.40* SEWER 252.03 SEWER 17.34 CH SEWER 29,372.00 SEWER 4.42 SEWER 996.03 30,641.82* PARK OTHER 300.00 OTHER 1,925.00 OTHER 2,317.58 OTHER 270.75 DRIV OTHER 14,571.16 19,384.49* Grand Total 233,461.70* • • • Consent Agenda Item 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 07/24/00 TOPIC: Consideration of not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per MN Statute 466.04 BACKGROUND Each year, the City has the option of waving it's monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. The city carries $1,000,000 in excess liability coverage ($1,000,000 per occurrence and annual limit). The City of Lino Lakes has never waived it's monetary limits on tort liability. OPTIONS 1. The City of Lino Lakes does not choose to waive it's monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. 2. The City of Lino Lakes chooses to waive it's monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. RECOMMENDATION Recommend option 1. • • • LMCIT LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000., regardless of the number of claimants. If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. 300,000/ The City of Lino Lakes accepts liability coverage limits of $ 1, 00 0 , 0 00 from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Check one: The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting July 2 4, 2 0 0 0 Signature Position City Administrator Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103 -2044 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police July 24, 2000 National Night Out, August 1, 2000 Simple Majority DATE TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND NATIONAL NIGHT OUT WAS DESIGNED TO HEIGHTEN CRIME AND DRUG PREVENTION AWARENESS, GENERATE SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL ANTICRIME EFFORTS, STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOOD SPIRIT AND POLICE - COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND SEND A MESSAGE TO CRIMINALS LETTING THEM KNOW THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS ARE ORGANIZED AND FIGHTING BACK. 41) RESIDENTS LOCK THEIR DOORS, TURN ON THEIR OUTSIDE LIGHTS FROM 7:00 PM TO 10:00 PM AND GET TOGETHER WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS. NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IS FOR ALL NEIGHBORHOODS AND BUSINESSES IN LINO LAKES, NOT JUST ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH GROUPS. • STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGE AND READ THE ATTACHED PROCLAMATION IN OUR SUPPORT OF DESIGNATING AUGUST 1, 2000 AS NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. OPTIONS 1. MOTION TO APPROVE 2. MOTION TO DENY RECOMMENDATION OPTION 1 - APPROVE SUPPORT OF NATIONAL NIGHT OUT • • • PROCLAMATION NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 2000 WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is once again sponsoring a unique, nationwide crime and drug prevention program on August 1, 2000 called "National Night Out "; and WHEREAS, the "17th Annual National Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for Lino Lakes to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative, police- community crime and drug prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes plays a vital role in assisting the Lino Lakes Police Department through joint crime and drug prevention efforts in Lino Lakes and is supporting "National Night Out 2000" locally; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Lino Lakes be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and impact that their participation can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in Lino Lakes; and WHEREAS, police - community partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" program; NOW, THEREFORE I, MAYOR BERGESON, do hereby call upon all citizens of Lino Lakes to join the Lino Lakes City Council and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting "17th Annual National Night Out" on August 1, 2000. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, MAYOR BERGESON, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 1, 2000 as "National Night Out" in Lino Lakes. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, Clerk- Treasurer /CMC • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Milo Bennett, Fire Chief MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: Open Burning Ordinance VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority Background: It has been many years since the Open Burning ordinance has been updated in Lino Lakes. The proposed ordinance attached replaces the present ordinance and goes into more detail and definition than the present ordinance. Items such as the burning of leaves or grass clippings are still prohibited under the new ordinance. • It also has a time of day limitation for recreational fires. These fires can only exist after 11:00 a.m. and before 3:00 a.m. There is provision in this ordinance for a fee for a burning permit. The actual fee to be set by City Council resolution. The ordinance that is being proposed has been adopted by both Centerville and Circle Pines. Options: 1. Approve the ordinance. 2. Reject the proposed ordinance. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Centennial Fire District, that you approve this ordinance. • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved • for its adoption. • • City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka State of Minnesota Ordinance No. 11 -00 An ordinance amending the Lino Lake City Code by repealing chapter 505 Open Burning and replacing it with the following: 505 Open Burning 505.01 Purpose The purpose of this section is to establish permitted categories of Open burning events within the City of Lino Lakes and provide for a permitting process for open burning, except when such open burning is defined as a Recreational Fire as defined in this section. 505.02 Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, the terms in this section are defined as follows: Subd. 1 Open Burning. "Open Burning" means the burning of any matter if the resultant combustion products are emitted directly to the atmosphere without passing through a stack, duct or chimney, except a Recreational fire as defined herein. Subd. 2 Recreational Fire. "Recreational Fire" means a fire set with approved starter fluid no more than three (3) feet in height, contained within the border of a "Recreational Fire Site" using dry, clean wood; producing little detectable smoke, odor or soot beyond the property line; conducted with an adult tending the fire at all times; for recreational, ceremonial, food preparation or social purposes; extinguished completely before quitting the occasion; and respecting weather conditions, neighbors, burning bans, and air quality so that nuisance, health or safety hazards will not be created. Mobile cooking devices such as manufactured hibachis, charcoal grills, wood smokers and propane gas devices are not defined as recreational fires. Recreational fires can only burn between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. and no more than one recreational fire is allowed on any property at one time. • • Subd. 3 Recreational Fire Site. "A Recreational Fire Site" means an area of no more than three (3) foot diameter circle (measured from the inside of the fire ring or border completely surrounded by non- combustible and non -smoke or odor - producing material either of natural rock, cement, brick, tile or blocks or ferrous metal only and which area is depressed below ground, on the ground or on a raised bed. Included are permanent outdoor woodburning fireplaces. Burning barrels are not a Recreational Fire Site as defined herein. Recreational Fire Sites shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any structure. Subd. 4 Starter Fuels. "Starter Fuels" means dry, untreated and unpainted kindling, branches or cardboard, or charcoal fire starter. Paraffin candles and alcohols are permitted as starter fuels and as aids to ignition only. Propane gas torches or other clean gas- burning devices causing minimal pollution must be used to start an Open Burn. Subd. 5 Wood. "Wood" means dry, clean fuel such as twigs, branches, limbs "presto logs ", charcoal, cord wood or untreated dimensional lumber. "Wood" does not include wood that is green, with leaves or needles, rotten, wet oil soaked or treated with preservatives. Clean pallets may be used for recreational fires when cut into three (3) foot lengths. Subd. 6 Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and Assistant Fire Marshals are the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and Assistant Fire Marshals of the Centennial Fire District, who have been appointed as fire wardens by the Commissioner of Natural Resources for Minnesota. 505.03 Prohibited Materials. No person shall conduct, cause or permit any of the following material: Subd. 1 Oils, petro fuels, rubber, plastics, chemically treated materials or other materials which produce excessive or noxious smoke such as tires, railroad ties, treated, painted or glued wood composite shingles, tar paper, insulation, composition board, sheetrock, wiring, paint or paint filters. Subd. 2 Hazardous waste or salvage operations, or open burning of solid waste generated from an industrial or manufacturing process or from a service or commercial establishment or building material generated from demolition or commercial or institutional structures. Subd. 3 Discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, • storage, preparation, serving or consumption of food. Subd. 4 Leaves or grass clippings. • • • 505.04 Statue Adopted by Reference. Minnesota Statutes Sections 88.16 through 88.22 are hereby incorporated by reference in this Section 505 as if fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between this Section 505 and said sections of Minnesota Statutes, the provision that places the greater restrictions or the higher standard shall apply. 505.05 Open Burning Permits. Subd. 1 Permits Required. No person shall start or allow any open burning anywhere within the City without first having obtained a permit, except that a permit is not required for any fire which is a Recreational Fire as defined herein. Subd. 2 Purposes Allowed for Open Burning. Open burn permits may be issued only for the following purposes: (a) Elimination of fire or health hazard that cannot be abated by other practical means. (b) Ground thawing for utility repair and construction. (c) Disposal of vegetative matter for managing forest, prairie or wildlife habitat, and in the development and maintenance of land and rights -of -way where chipping, composting, landspreading or other alternative methods are not practical. (d) Disposal of diseased trees generated on site, diseased or infected nursery stock, or diseased bee hives. (e) Disposal of unpainted, untreated, non -glued lumber and wood shakes generated from construction, where recycling, reuse, removal or other alternative disposal methods are not practical. Subd. 3 Permit Application for Open Burning and Permit Fees. (a) Open Burning permits shall be obtained by making application on a form prescribed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and adopted by the Centennial Fire District. The permit application shall be presented to the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal or an Assistant Fire Marshal. Each application shall be accompanied by a fee, as set annually by City Council resolution. • • • (b) Upon receipt of the completed Open Burning permit application and permit fee, the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal or Assistant Fire Marshal may schedule a preliminary site inspection to locate the proposed burn site, note special conditions, set dates and times of permitted burn and review fire safety considerations. The official reviewing the application shall also develop a burn event safety plan for the requested burn. (c) If established criteria for the issuance of an open burning permit are not met, or, during review of said application, it is determined that a practical alternative method for disposal of the material exists, or a pollution or nuisance condition would result, or if a burn event safety plan cannot be drafted to the satisfaction of the official reviewing the application, the official may deny the application for the open burn permit. Subd. 4 Permit Holder Responsibility. (a) Prior to starting an Open Burn, the permit holder shall be responsible for confirming that no burning ban or air quality alert is in effect. Every Open Burn event shall be constantly attended by the permit holder. The Open Burn site shall have available, appropriate communication and fire suppression equipment as set out in the burn event safety plan. (b) The Open Burn shall be completely extinguished before the permit holder leaves the site. No fire may be allowed to smolder with no flame present. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to have a valid permit, as required by this section, available for inspection on the site. (c) The permit holder is responsible for the compliance and implementation of all general conditions, special conditions, and the burn event safety plan as established in the permit issued. The permit holder shall be responsible for all costs incurred as a result of the burn, including, but not limited to, fire suppression and administrative fees. • • • Subd. 5 Revocation of Open Burning Permit. The Open Burning Permit is subject to revocation at the discretion of a DNR forest officer, or the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal, or Assistant Fire Marshal. Reasons for revocation include, but are not limited to: A fire hazard existing or developing during the course of the burn, any of the conditions of the permit being violated during the course of the burn, pollution or nuisance conditions developing during the course of the burn, or a fire smoldering with no flame present. 505.06 Burning Ban or Air Quality Alert. No Recreational Fire or Open Burn will be permitted when the City or DNR has officially declared a burning ban due to potential hazardous fire conditions or when the MPCA has declared an Air Quality Alert. 505.07 Violation. Any violation of the provisions of this Section 505, or of the terms of any permit issued pursuant to this section, shall be a misdemeanor. Each day a violation exists shall be a separate violation. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council, this day of , 20 Mayor Attest: Clerk Published in on the day of , 20 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Milo Bennett, Fire Chief MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: Ordinance adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority Background: Every 3 to 4 years, the state of Minnesota adopts an updated Uniform Fire Code. When the state adopts this code, it becomes the fire code to be used throughout the state. By adopting this same code, it gives the local fire inspectors the authority to enforce the code when doing their inspections. This has proven to be very beneficial in reducing the fire losses and the adoption of this code is a standard practice in a large number of communities. Options: Approve the ordinance, which allows Centennial Fire District to continue the fire prevention efforts. Reject the ordinance and turn control of the Fire Code enforcement back to the state. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Centennial Fire District, that you approve • this ordinance. We believe this is a critical item when it comes to citizen safety and fire loss reduction. • • • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved for its adoption. City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka State of Minnesota Ordinance No. 12 -00 An ordinance amending the Lino Lakes City Code by repealing chapter 1002 Fire Code and replacing it with the following: 1002 Fire Code 1002.01 Uniform Fire Code Adoption The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, as adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 299F.011, is hereby adopted as the fire code for the City of Lino Lakes for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life or property from fire, hazardous material, or explosion. The provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code except as modified or amended by this ordinance, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance as set forth herein. One copy of this code shall be marked as the official copy and shall be on file in the office of the Fire Chief. 1002.02 Enforcement (a) The Chief of the Centennial Fire District serving Lino Lakes or the Chief's representatives are authorized to administer and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. (b) The Chief of the Centennial Fire District may detail such members of the fire department as may be necessary to administer and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. 1002.03 Definitions (a) Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, it shall mean the City of Lino Lakes. (b) Whenever the term "this code" is used in the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code or this ordinance, it shall mean the code adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. • • • (c) Whenever the term "Fire Department" is used, it shall mean the Centennial Fire District. 1002.04 Appeals Pursuant to Minnesota Statue 299F.011, subd. 5a, a board of appeals is hereby established for the City of Lino Lakes The board of appeals shall consist of the Mayor, the Building Official, the City Administrator and shall include the chief of the fire department of the chief's designated representative who shall serve as an exofficio member. The board of appeals shall consider issues related to disapproval of an application or permit issuance, claims, or misapplication or misinterpretation of the code, or requests for variances from orders issued under this code. Requests for appeals shall be made within 30 days of the date of decision of the chief or issuance of orders. 1002.05 Penalties (a) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this code, or builds in violation of any certificate or permit issued under this code, or builds in violation of plans or detailed statement of specifications submitted and approved under this code, or violated any order made pursuant to this code, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to timely comply with an order affirmed or modified by the Lino Lakes Board of Appeals as defined in section 1002.04 or by a court of competent jurisdiction, for each violation shall severally be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and /or by imprisonment as set forth in other regulations of this jurisdiction. The imposition of one penalty for any violation or permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. (b) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. 1002.06 Validity The Lino Lakes City Council hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance or code herein adopted be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Lino Lakes City Council that they would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of any such section as may be declared invalid. • Effective Date This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council, this day of , 20 Mayor Attest: Clerk Published in on the day of , 20 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: • Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • . AGENDA ITEM 7A (Updated) • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: (This staff report has been updated to include information regarding the resident poll, and appraisals, that was received after the original report was prepared.) On June 26, 2000, the City Council held a public hearing for this project. After receiving public comment, the consideration of the resolution adopting the assessment was delayed to allow staff time to gather additional information. A poll was sent to the affected residents to determine their interest in the City proceeding with the project. The results of the property owner survey are as follows: No Yes Conditional Total %Response 1St Addition 9 7 3 19 19/24= 80% 2nd Addition 4 3 0 7 7/7= 100% The conditional responses indicated a positive response only if the assessment amounts are supported by the appraisals. An updated map showing the responses; a copy of the information sent to the residents with the poll; and responses received after the work session are attached. As we have mentioned before, after discussing this matter with the contractor, C. W. Houle, they have agreed to honor their bid even if the City delays the award until August 28, 2000. C.W. Houle would need to begin construction by September 8, 2000, in order to complete the improvements, through the bituminous paving, this year. The restoration of the boulevard areas and driveways would likely carry over until spring of 2001. The City Attorney has now received an appraisal opinion on this project. A copy of the opinion from The Taylor Appraisal Company and a clarification letter I sent on July 20, 2000, is attached. The appraisal opinion indicates the increased value for houses with functioning septic and well systems is about $2,000 to $3,000; it also indicates the increased value for houses experiencing problems with these systems is about $5,000 to $10,000. Even if the maximum benefit is assumed to be $10,000 for each affected lot, the City would not even be able to cover the cost of the construction contract for this project, let alone the proposed assessment. The City will not be able to recover the project costs through 100% assessment of this project. Unless other funding sources could be identified to pay for this project, it cannot proceed as currently proposed. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. 2. Do not adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. 3. Refer to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option 2 — Do not adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -64 RESOLUTION NOT TO ADOPT THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE TWILIGHT ACRES 1ST AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions, WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions project, bids were received, and, WHEREAS, the City has also received an opinion from Taylor Appraisal Company regarding the benefit to the properties within the project area, and WHEREAS, the improvement costs cannot be recovered through the estimated assessments to the benefiting properties, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The assessment for this project as proposed is not adopted. 1. The bids for this project are hereby rejected. 2. The City Engineer is directed to notify the contractors of the City's decision and return their bid bonds. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 24, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk • • • HOUSE NUMBERS km NOM 0710 Pgp pyad.... MMUIOWn \P PAY WVWeI ruva IOY • • July 12, 2000 To: Twilight Acres lst and 2nd Addition Area Residents Re: Project Update and Resident Poll Dear Resident: On June 26, 2000, the City Council held a public hearing for this project. After receiving public comment, consideration of the resolution adopting the assessment was postponed. An update was presented to the City Council on July 10, 2000 that included the following information: • After discussing this matter with the contractor submitting the lowest bid, C. W. Houle, they have agreed to honor their bid even if the City delays the contract award until August 28, 2000. C.W. Houle would need to begin construction by September 8, 2000, in order to complete the improvements, through the bituminous paving, this year. The restoration of the boulevard areas and driveways would likely carry over until spring of 2001. • The City Attorney indicated that he has had further discussions with an appraiser. The appraiser indicated they would have appraisals for two or three lots completed in time for the July 24, 2000, City Council meeting. He also indicated the appraiser will only have time to prepare an abbreviated report but will give the City Council and residents an estimate of the property value change due to the proposed project. The City Council has also directed City staff to send out a survey to poll the affected property owners regarding the project proceeding. Please complete the attached poll form and return it to the City at your earliest convenience. We would appreciate receiving your response no later than Tuesday, July 18, 2000. The City Council will again consider action on the proposed assessments at their July 24, 2000, meeting. City staff will present the results of the poll and the appraisal information at that meeting. If you have any questions before the meeting, please call me at 651- 982 -2430. Sincerely, M. owell, P ity En ineer 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 15 AND 211D ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL Name: Street Address: Question: Do you want the City of Lino Lakes to proceed with the proposed construction project that would provide sanitary sewer and water service to your property? Comments: No Yes When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for • your response. CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1sT AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL Name: Q. I \i0_,Actex b �,+ w � iJ Street Address: %' 3 V t t Question: Do you want the City of Lino Lakes to proceed with the proposed construction project that would provide sanitary sewer and water service to your property? Yes Comments: When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for your response. • • Name: CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1sT AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL c c1 Street Address: Question: Do you want the City of Lino Lakes to proceed with the proposed construction project that would provide sanitary sewer and water service to your property? Comments: Yes When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for 40 your response. • CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1sT AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL Name: dicitif6t(„�Qal U e .SS Street Address: 1/? 1/2(7 /N Question: Do you want the City of Lino Lakes to proceed with the proposed construction project that would provide sanitary sewer and water service to your property? Comments: 1- Afar /►-r Cit of t Cosh No Yes 2- /-f Ck MJ& FO DA- 1 C-, /,V or nA/ 1111 J ,v 7/ 0Airf s 77/116. t t r i /,T v/7 4 AA/ID. 05 /oh1 • Dutb L ( Cal vorigA. oa /Psi Tb 7 W / /Dr , oit'1 i )T/wivr /dN -v /Th-f5 When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for your response. CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1ST AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL Name: Street Address: Question: Do you want the City of Lino Lakes to proceed with the proposed construction project that would provide sanitary sewer and water service to your property? Comments: ihA 41,0 No Yes When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for • your response. 0 • LAW OFFICES OF William G. Hawkins and Associates Legal Assistant WILLIAM G. HAWKINS TAMMI J. UVEGES BARRY A. SULLIVAN July 18, 2000 John Powell Lino Lakes City Engineer Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Twilight Acres Appraisal Dear John: 2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 PHONE (763) 427 -8877 FAX (763) 421 -4213 E -MAIL HawkLawl@aol.com RECEIVED JUL 1 9 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES Enclosed please find a copy of a preliminary appraisal I received from the Taylor Appraisal Company concerning the benefit to the homes in Twilight Acres 1' and 2'd Additions as a result of the proposed sewer and water project. As you can see, Mr. Taylor does not feel that there is a sufficient monetary increase to sustain the special assessments to the parcels. In view of this information, I believe the Council must consider options other than 100% assessment to the residents. Please contact me if you have any questions. Si ely, William G. awkins WGH /tju Enclosure cc: Linda Waite Smith FROM :`THE TAYLOR "APPRAI"SAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:29PM P2 THE TAYLOR .A PPRA.IS AL COMPAN Y 3�? ylff? s1?' �9P� 'ftL- d'+ifSPi�BcGiU:daSt;i "w,�; REAL t.STA1E APPRAISERS ' ANALYSTS July 17, 2000 Mr. William G. Hawkins Hawkins & Associates 2140 Fourth Avenue Anoka, NLN 55303 RECEIVED JUL 1 9 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES RE: INDICATED VALUE INCREASE DUDE TO THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF CITY SEWER AND WATER IN THE TWILIGHT ACRES 1ST AND 2ND ADDITIONS, LINO LAKES, MN Dear Mr. Hawkins: Enclosed you will find the preliminary results of the research our firm did to determine what additional value the subject lots could expect if city sewer and water were to be install ed. There are ten (10) homes that sold in 1998/1999, all of which did not have public sewer, nor water. They are labeled subject on each of the ten (10) attached pages. Each sale has a set of five (5) comparables, all of which had city sewer and water. The comparables are similar to the subject on their corresponding page. A summary of this study is shown below. TABLE ONE Address Subject Sale Without Sewer and Water Avg. Adj. Sale Price of the Five Comparables That Have Sewer and Water Difference or Value Contribution of City Sewer and Water 819 Orange Street $118,085 $121,763 $3,678 836 Olive Street $129,500 $129,338 $ 162 7718 Country Lane $115,000 $117,295 $2.259 7599 Jenne Drive $134,295 $134,603 $ 308 8109 Diane $130,553 $128,711 (51,842) 7769 Mcadowvicw Trail 5116.277 $117,843 $1,566 819 Orange Street $131,849 $132,590 $ 741 • 8028 Danube Street $133,000 $134,047 $1,047 843 Orange Street $133,643 $142,338 $8,595 855 Oran c Street $130,255 $1432388 $13,133 5955 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 201, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 . 612/544 -9860 • FAX 612/542 -9381 FROM :-THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. Mr. William G. 'Hawkins Page 2 July 17, 2000 PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 200 12 : 30PM P3 These ten (10) studies had an average difference of $2,964. in the city of Lino Lakes, similar type properties with public sewer and water will sell for about $2,900 ®, more than those with private wells and septic systems. However, if you will notice the sales that had addresses on Orange Street and Olive Street had a different average for the differences. These five (5) sales are shown below. TABLE TWO ADDRESS DIFFERENCE AVERAGE 819 Orange Street $ 3,678 836 Olive Street $ 162 819 Orange Street $ 741 843 Orange Street $ 8,595 855 Orange Street $13,133 AVERAGE $ 5,261 ® The private water or sewer systems on these streets, Olive and Orange., have lately come under stress. They (according to the city) have reported that replacement or repair is beginning to become a problem and I would guess that the buyers and sellers are becoming aware of it, and are reflecting it in the sales prices. In conclusion, I would suggest that if the private water and sewer systems are working well, you could expect a house with public water and sewer will sell for about $2,000 to $3,000 more. However, on the other hand, if the area in which the private systems are beginning to experience some trouble, I would estimate that the public systems could add $5,000 to $10,000. In the case of 855 Orange Street it was $13,100 ®. We experienced some difficulty in this assignment because our first research and analysis (Table One) produced no results. It flies in the face of logic. So we started to back track and redid our thinking on the type of comparables we can use. It seems to me that if a house, or a subdivision, is having well and sewer problems, the value difference would be the cost to cure, i.e., the cost of the city utilities. PROM :'THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. Mr. William G. Hawkins Page 3 July 17, 2000 PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:31PM P4 Maybe this difference does not get reflected in the market place until that subdivision is so bad it must request the city utilities. In any case, it might be appropriate for the city engineer to request this kind of research six months to a year in advance, so that it can be adequately done. I know that these results are not what you wanted to see, but due to the short period of time that the city gave as to come up with an answer, this is it. If you want me to come by some day on my way home from work and go over this with you, I will be glad to do that. Please contact me when it would be. Respectfully sub • - Y OR APPR4 E. Taylor, MAI, SRA President /Appraiser MN License No. 4000015 /pb COMPANY FROM :. THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125427381 Jul. 17 2000 12:31PM P5 00 O N 49 $131.251 <0 (A 49 O O 4 0Op c? 49 °O (!) 69 w (°O CO Hv �(0 N 4's -°o 0 609 O V ° ° O? V 1 $121,0501 6718 6909 Glenvie MLS C1 3/98 (0 C Cl 090'1.1 Park Avg /Gd C.7 CA C- CO rn 960/850 O N M a ~ FWA/CA � ~- Att.-2 L' 'L 0, None N p Z KE+ r ii0i on HoliyDrive 0 Q0, s} .N-- 69 LC, CO r0 r, 49 O 4�i O O N O 40', .c fA O .N- cA $440[ o 4'i o LO AA Q N .d. U O O _ O O^ d9 O Q0) 49 O CO,_ N N J r Conv. Mtge 3/99 COO C 23,600 1 Av . 20 c. O _ N (O O in 1 956/644 2/1/0.75 G [ FWA/CA 0. H .. ¢ 3 Seas.Pch Wood Stove = W X 6610 7W Pheasant Run 0 0 o 49 T O (0', IA vs O O N _ $1,500 o N -. CO O 4N4 (Q N to O a0 0 (f, �- oort; 1 CD V' ('7 y CD '4" (0 N 69 MLS Conv. Mt e 5/98 C. c) U o Park 1 Avg. 14 v rn 1 954/432 1 C7 o °a1 F 1 FWA/CA mQ.. H CV a v p CD ca o 2 Z 417 o Z Y ][ t . 6634 Ow Pheasant Run $113,5001 1` cci Y-- co _O 11 49 1(00n$) O ((_ 49 b N d7 O ((0 N EA O ti iA O 0W_ O 69 T 0y (0 ff„ (0001W 1 co C O $123,948 MLS FHA M e 6198 C . U °o o L Park Avg. 14 0 - Q o '0 (n °' 1 954/432 ((°, r �° F L FWA/CA ]a F- Tuck -2 Deck None rFence KE,SAT 194 21W I Wildflower Drive p u-, ..- 4'i CV <o tL (C, (0 O ti ((, c N (5 (p ....... $0 O > ..1 ($1,500) O th ,� O W rn v 41 �� $120,520 MLS Conv. Mt e 5/98 E2 -65 11,050 'C c? ¢¢aO 0 <CO , 40 CO : (CJ FWA/CA CV ¢ Le.Dk,Port None 1_ Fence p a Subject #17 819 Orange Street It CD CD O cri (ss $117.711 LO CO O 16 LO 0 (0 69 $118,085 MLS 1 °7 MCO O �O u (Nn m CO 0 N p Homes 1 Average 11 v 0 7 O7 ¢ o �.' 10 O (0 CA v CO CO Cln (n ti ,..7-..: (- FWA/CA 1 � Det. -2 Deck None C O Z 1 KE,WSO ADDRESS 1 �. X 2 Sales Price Price/Gross Liv.Area g O D Finance /Concessions Date of SaieITime Location Site (sq.ft.) View Appeal /Const.Quality Age c p 'p 0 Room Count Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade - S cV C O ti o 0 U_ b = Energy Efficiency Garage /Carport Porch, Patio, Deck Fireplace(s) etc. Fence, Pool, etc. Extras Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price FROM : THE TAYLOR PPPRAISAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:32PM P6 i- cc:. O _ Vi o -- CN O C/5 co <O 64 ° Cy o O to H C9 o° o ' so Q '() "1' to . 6'f V' Vi CO C) o' o > o O Vi O V> co I> O O C? CV, AM C S ' 1`mV e Inn CO O CD g U m IV,VVV On.• °' r CO ¢ Q o CO) «Nj d0�i K] r.,_ N a Q c f I uck -2 l (lanL j ri u 1 ,- w 6b10 7W Pheasant Run Or �p O Eft K 609 M W VU G3/ cO' 10 V� c"') 'cf Vf O CO i-A O C fV 6 `--' cp; O c'1 N O r 69 CD = p 0 u) 0 ri onrie Q Q O to N Lr, O o~ .11". n Arnlr I n H �r 4 I T.. .L a Z Alnne. O LO 6.3. 1,-. co • CO .en, O CD V609 Lc) p O d9 in *4) - O O 64 O O O O b� O O r) O O 69 - Co, r7 0) N 61 J � O�% LL ) O p ` to > I AvnrrA O t'C yCO O) al = O .VW', 1 Ivo Deck C KE,SAT O COO d C `O N a GO C CON $1,435 CO ..Cr O III .4- O O ° O O in N- d4 C) LC) O 64 CO O O ( I MLS a) CO co cm Q = 0 C� 52 r) V p c•-, j sn O v j Q . r a >7 Q N L kr> co a, N A /- Q d C 3 i.--- F- Deck 1 a. u C, O ay 0 . C7> K a0) ti CO _6i K so sr () CV 0 O O C 0 69 0 0 O cc 69 o CO C t c0 O O N N r) 69 O h- to co 6789 Black Duck N °) 0 a U U --J W a Q 08O'l 0- l /£ /5 ° ° ,n o I-- T Q ?� L T . Tuck -2 1 )joap .Y LL CO as 1 C 0 Z KE,WSO X16 'eet ° o ,n Cr; <• LID o C') 6'3 $129,5001 MLS Cont. Deed 5/99 B3 -52 10,300 E S O In O CD o a FWNCA T . Tuck -2 Deck BkFP -1 c. LU CO co ILI Ce Q 0 R. 0 ' cp cC Q e Q c Q C ate) 0 U C 0 -a ) as C w Q IL IM O <E U J _ y a% to y� o i fi5 N U m Q Room Count Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade u o c li Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency Garage /Carport Porch, Patio, Deck Fireplace(s) etc. y O V c li Extras Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price FROM :, THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Ju:. 17 2000 12:33PM P7 6642 8W Pheasant Run 0 O O CO- O V.) CY C+j b^4 0 CD CO '�' b`T O CO? CO b9 0 O O N 44 0 V) 0 CO 0 N 69 o V' CO 69 v 47 CV CJ E^ o ' O N 6� 0 O N "o- 69 0 O O N 4.9 0 O N b9 c- O •tY b: 0 CO I+ K7 64 0 CO N- C•J 64 MLS FHA Mtge co CO (9 0 O Park ? CD 0 • LLS 954/432 r; U a FWANVA Cl. Tuck -2 Deck Q. None Y 6610 7W Pheasant Run O O CD CD 8• C7 N , 69 0 4 CO rfr 0 O N v) 0 [0$ I 0 N 69 O 0 4.9. O N J O O (0 O N b9 O O O 0). 0) O CCU T MLS Conv. Mtge_ CO u7 CD CD V O 00 _Park J Avg. ..- Avg /Gd O to rn m 7 ca 0 ?O. .- H Q • T f- Tuck-2 '� c Z 0 Z • KE 6634 #9W Pheasant Run o o O M u3 r- CO v3 0 v� M t 0 o 0 8) 0 0 O bN4 �. 0 64 0 69 0 N by 0 sY CD b� 0 o (0 0 O N !R .. 0 0 N by 0 0 C'7 _ 0 0 co _O (0 49 O O O v4 ML_s FHA Mtge 1 co _O O CD CO U o O Park 1 > Avg/Gd I in 954 954/432 1 T g U }-. 1- Tuck -2 I Deck None 1 , Fence Q (ii W 6601 #10W Pheasant Run o O -cr.. 0) 49. t0 N $2,388 a O O b 4 O N. 0 ER c' a9 0 N Vi $720 O O h- O O N O O N (000'zt;) p O CO O O 'Cl. 9 b N O CO V,. co 0) O 0) b4 MLS Conv. Mtge c" o CO U o o t` V) E _ "0 a prn , a; -t? C rn 954/296 LO a H c V • >, F- Tuck -2 I 1 Deck G. U m O L) L1... Y 6789 11W _ Black Duck Trail $149,000 CD to M_ O b7 000'E$ (Ooo'oi. ) o CO �7 a O O H 0 N 'V• ($1,580) $2,250, o N $4,2001 0 N b�T o N o LMCi O O d- CO b9 MLS d CM o CI rn " u? U CO 14,000 Lake " C7 N Avg /Gd 513/1.0 W 1,080/400 LO ci, ° F- FWA/CA c. Tuck -2 Deck BkFP -1 c Z KE,WSO Subject #15 7718 Country Lane O CD o u i 69 0) n 0.; ,r--- tFi 0 64 O O o ui b9 MLS Conv. Mtge N CO C� Q 43,600 Homes Avg. ! 'a Q O _ a o CD N CC) CO O CD W o n. Y CT7 f- o. 12 Tuck -2 3 Seas, Deck None Shed U t)1 CO O C/) TS lil ADDRESS IalunxoJd - Sales Price Price/Gross Liv.Area Data Source Finance/Concessions Date of Sale/Time Location Site (sq.ft.) View Appeal /Const.Quality 0 b G U Room Count Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency GaragelCarport Porch, Patio, Deck Firepllace(sj etc. Fence, Pool, etc. Extras O Z Adjusted Sates Price FROM :. THE TAYLOR RPPRR I SRL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:34PM P8 } H7 > d O �' = Z4,9001 V30.651 $6,2451 CD O N so 0 Ul 0 0O bi 0 t j '�' 0 irY DI 0° CV �v O vTi `u2 ,� { .9- 00 c{v,� bi LO Ltd Nrnrn �1 $1;x4,1851 i MIS Conv. Mtge Cr, M CO co U O o CV C7 Q 0.- Q O L> O Ln O LC) ~ . N L3, 1 FWA/CA CI. N Q 3 Seas.Pch C Z INone w 7128 18W Grey HeronDrive___ O O CO 69 4,rj r cr N 4 . O C7 69 O O i0A 69 O O f09 $1,155 $5,810 ($2,256 CD O 0 i9 0 O p LA LA <t a $135,145 1 MLS FHA Mtge 1 01 "' cp CLp. `� O Q 1 (Park) L C.D Q 5 Avg /Gd 5/211.0 1,047 520/480 2/1/0.75 C1. �-- FWA/CA 1 4 F- N .d Deck C z C z W 6578 16W Pheasant Run o o CIS e. •,.. C'7 Qj ,- 4H cO fA O O 69 ($3,000 O 69 .1 O t(> 69 .._. 54,550, $4,330, ($3,000 (000' l$) O o 69 v $500, O co 4 ($15,306 O f` M - MLS 1 Conv. Mtge 1 fi [ 11,250 tts y Q. o p 0. Q Ca t-- o t -= C M~ FWA/CA F- Att. -2 Deck -2 IL Z 1 KE,WSO 6990 6W 2ndAvenue O O CO N 69 CV ti y9 CO CO er N 44 O O O CO. to O O 0 N 69 O O _O O 69 69 O> "Cr 49 (0 49 O 0 O 69 O 6 O 44 O 0 .C) 69 O O O CO- 49 CO CO CT 44 CO CO N C 7 O r tR ■ MLS CIN Mtge Oa 51,332 fl1i! 5/3/1.0 1,040 1040/0 0/010,0 Q Att.-2 None 1 None 7132 17W SunriseDrive o O O> CO 49 co CD d 0 49 o O O 49 Li> O> CO 609 o o O w O .n o 0 N N 69 N O 69- CO 0 0 O O o 4[7 66 9 0 O O 49 0 O (0 a (0 0 49 o LC) N CO 69 MLS f Cash O ,.._ C LA CO W IA � Good -CI 0 >7 Q O O C) � O _ N O u7 O O i_ FWA/CA A I— Att. -3 Lge. Dk. C O Z None KE+ Subject #14 7599 Jeanne Drive O 0> ti N E9 CO CD N r w 00f 47 cD Hi a c'> cD !A ,00) N ■ Co 69 MLS Conv. Mtge th Li." 46,550 Homes 'O Q '0 0 co = O c`7 Q Att. -2 Deck Wood Stove Shed NG --- ADDRESS .X o a Sales Price Price /Gross Liv.Area Data Source Finance /Concessions Date of Sale/Time O 4 V J Cr v i.75 > AppeallConst.Quaiity Age Condition Room Count Gross Livin • Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency GaragelCarport Porch, Patio, Deck Fireplace(s) etc. Fence. Pool, etc. Extras (0 O O Q Z Adjusted Sales Price FROM :. THE TAYLOR APPRA I SRL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2880 12:35PM P9 t/9 n O o Le-) O O cs n Vi (.4,-) S.2451 O D r O 1111 o 0 0 O N $2001 N co N h. 69 Iuii MLS Cony. Mtge O GQ 23,600 Avs /Gd 20 Av. /Gd 5/2/1.0 956 956/644 FWA/CA 1 CV 3 Seas.Pch C C KE 7128 18W Grey HeronDrive $5,240 (oo9`s$) 0$ 1oo0'ES) 000'ES $8,000 00 W 00 Cf Y N 1 MLS FHA Mtge CO mIIL 12,000 Park Av. /Gd 5 Av./Gd 5/2/1.0 1,047 520/480 FWA/CA Q . None KE+ 6578 16W Pheasant Run $148,000 $129.37 K3 O c•- 4R O C7 69 - C•O> N T- N 69 MLS ' c O U O CD C3-66 C4 U CO C0 C o ITS 0 CO a > O ^ ,_ 1144/870 O co - I- FWA/CA 1 - CV Deck -2 1 a G KE,WSO U T N O C,> O G CV O o CO CD O CO CD CO o O N O > $127,736] 6990 2nd CI) J W _ Z U O> Cr) a`> CO w C',, C`> in (Park) Avg /Gd O N } Q O �> u> , 1,040 O O a° O O o - I* FWA/CA CV None C Z G Z W 7132 17W SunriseDrive O CO CD CO r M O $3,000 Cr> COO b04 (oo5'E$) O b9 LC> CO O O N O 69 O fA O O CV 69 O bg O 0 CV 4,9 O CO_ O CO Ni $131,250] CO Cash 1/00 Co " w Cn .t Good °i a y < o CN/ to rn O m O 0 O e /"'" U a C"> Q Y a> o Z a> o Z Y Subject #13 8109 Diane Street CD CO ti O - N N 69 CO PO fA CO 00 $130,5531 III;tEuF _ E x o Sales Price Price /Gross Liv.Area Data Source 1 MLS Finance /Concessions 1 CIN Mtge Date of Sale/Time 1 7/99 Location 1 B4 -52 u v� View Homes Appeal /Const.Quaiity Avg /Gd Age 16 Condition Avg /Gd Room Count 5/2/1.0 Gross Living Area 960 Basement/Finish 960/840 Rooms Below Grade 2/1/0.0 Functional Utility . Typ. Heating /Cooling FWA Energy Efficiency Typ. Garage/Carport Att. -2 Porch, Patio, Deck Deck Z c y a s ` ii Fence, Pool, etc. 1 None Extras KE,WSO Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price ADDRESS FROM THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. • PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:36PM P10 +�. K}7 6) ? Q r— _d 0 t- _ CD CD ; d> U7 CD d 4 Lr> N t7 O CD V`> 0 69 O U _ Hi 0 _ tO. 0 co C O o to c O tO DOLlES) Lc> co Lo �? CO to CO - Cony. Mtge 3/99 (�] °p cO (-9 > 1 N C-9 C7 } ._ N to tr 956/644 2/1/0.75 a 1- U a s o. k-- N < 3 Seas.Pch None c O W SC CO r C) 'C in Co C CV 2 jp CV cy N 69 o CV o Qv v o vs o °o ui O o o CV to o �° 0 o° CO 0 t°n � 0 LC) o° 00 ' .- 1 ,- dy FHA Mt e 5/99 N (Park) j] 5 Ava /Gd ' c4 O !!1U1 Att. -2 Deck None 6578 16W Pheasant Run CV to O O O c• i ch O O .T 1= O O tin C7 O VT t0 O v [D C`r9r N ($200 ($32,330 CO 69 MLS W rn M U CO N l Open Space Good o 0 O? 1144/870 3/2/1.0 T /CA FWA ti Att. -2 Deck -2 FP -1 c KE,WSO $121,800 ti iR $2,436 000'Et) � O LC? a% � o CO C.4 $520 $2,250 ($1,500) p O Q cc> t� tFi D tfs 6990 2nd I MLS Ern 9/99 CO ly 51,332 t9 Avg /Gd _ 0 N p; O t.�j O 1040/0 0/0/0.0 T FWA/CA Q a. r N C C O O C O 7132 17W Sunrise Drive O to th — c(O O t�# 4°s O [h to 0)) CO t0 t9 O *9 d a fA CD CD d9 $1,130 $2,250 ($1,500) 0 0) O 099'L l$ 000 ES 0' N N I MLS U o E2-65 I Good I rn¢ co 979/0 0/0/0.0 T •• FWA/CA F�' Att. -3 L e. Deck None Z $115,126 CV in W c` to tYT Cl) _i L ca U c O .47:-c 9 46,174 CO O = I Avg /Gd D „._ O) ¢ [� an O CV LO c 6- C a co ti T }' None L e. Deck None Q) O Z KE ADDRESS Proximity Sales Price Price /Gross Liv.Area Data Source Finance /Concessions Date of Sale/Time Location Site (sq.ft .) Appeal/Const.Quality Age Condition Room Count Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade Functional Utili Heatin. /Coolin• Energy Efficiency Gera •elCa •ort Porch, Patio, Deck Fire glace s etc. Fence, Pool, etc. Extras Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price FROM THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:37PM P11 r O 07 07 N CO N 49 CO Q: d CO c O LO b9 Q c0 63 CO co "N c .,� 0- O O O C7 �3 O o O O (. V3 u7 I1 N 64 GO N 69 i J U C Q to m o crJ 0 0 N a° or 0 <a O CO . O Q` ri U LLLL CL ~ N Q 0 cu cl LL 610. w (n u Y 1101 5W HollvDrive H 4i OQi V3 O 69 O K C0 49 O 49 403 O C.O. O O � N 9 N d3 CO a) °7 U CA CO U C N a d O N a Q ° Lo cc) Lc, `� Q cb crt LO o N c a. 1-- Q a a t- N Q _c v C0 y o= c l.il Oc C? CO _ m_ 63 V 1 $12.350 00 O °o C CO. 69 a 4NR °v CO V3 49 0 O 69 a LLC> 9 0 LO 0 O 49 0 10- 69 0 ti 49 1 MLS 1 Conv. Mtge 4i LL) Lu 1 12,450 'C > CL CO p U 0 Q rn Q) LC) Q F- FWAICA T. Att. -3 0 CU Shed 1 KE,WSO+ 1 473 2W Birch Street $142,000 $121.37 $2,840 00 0 N 00 0 CO. 0° Ln 'er 669 0 co et O ° N o `'� Oa C) c 0 a 'ct o r a CV rn G) CO o N V3 MLS Conv. Mt e 11199 M CO O N Lake,Park -0 > Q N b > Q L[7 r- 1170/1000 p H FWAICA I F-, Q L. Deck,Patio FP -2 KE,SEC C> G ['rj W V> `c- —d V3 (000'E$) O O v A ti LO N Vi CO O CO to, L(0 4.9 O CO. 63 (0 CO. v- CO') C`7 c) VY 6550 Pheasant 1 MLS CD CO O 'CC t0 = Lt- co co U LOO) N CO d i? Q a0 O an Q cp O r��. �. U Q{ CV �" Q C Z C Z KE,WSO,SECF 1 #11 Street $129,900 $125.63 c CA 63 v O) 09. v CO C7 69 MLS N U�) LL B3 -52 O o = Q ■7 < ) 1,034 co cO co 0 Le" -Q. F— FWNCA T. Att. -2 Y None None cn f/) CO LU cc Q d y7. E o. CQ Q J N CO -- O N C6 -� C!) d qj = t as C) N C: O E 8 (v O (U () CO 0 SP, L1_ O fo(pp _J +� d 0) View Appea llConst.Quality Age C C 0 a C O C) (X Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency Garage/Carport Porch, Patio, Deck Fireplace(s) etc. Fence, Pool, etc. 1 u) Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price FROM THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. w 0 z 0 a4 EE z a 0 u- 0 cn PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12:37PM P12 6642 8W Pheasant Run O O O O c'V ,...5 ,- vi c,4 cc CV O O N 4,9 -- -- $5,40(21 O t[7 c6 69 O 'Cr' t) 19 `- 1-- 69 a CU 69 O 69 0 O 0 N V O tf) N 69 O _ LO c, t MLS FHA Mtge 00 O CQ O O Park ..cr. O 954 954/432 to a Q d, CV Y Deck L-dd .I) 6610 7W Pheasant Run $106,0001 69 O O 49 g O "'' 00£'9$ to 69 "'. 0 CO N-° ^ ch. i9 N 0 O z„,-9, 00Z$ - $28,370 ° c") M CO MLS Conv. Mtge CO tO O CO c„,', U 0 CD t7 . Park Avg, 14 Avg. F.-g, 954 954/432 O a }� FWA!CA H Tuck -2 O 6 CL- N 0 aUON f 6634 #9W Pheasant Run O to 6? 6 tom- c fA «) CV — O O t,C) — co to 096'3 OLL'L$ $750 1 O cc9 O O O CO.., V9 O W V.. MLS FHA Mt9e CO CO w CO U O r Park Avg. 14 Q O N a; t CO O a T FWANCA !— Tuck -2 d O None Fence KE,SAT 6601 #10W Pheasant Run CD 0 .� r' N-. m tca 49, $8,3581 0 to 49 ° r: C) 69 69 0 >n v 0 O a 0 O 0 to 4 0Di$ CO co CO te r) MLS 1 Conv. Mtge fi 13,000 = Q Q uo 954 954/296 " ~ a F- Tuck -2 Deck Li 1 Fence,OB 6789 11W Black Duck Trail O CD cc O N 69 O 63 (O00'Ol) ($7,450 $4 500 O O co c' O _ 69 69 O O vi ($13,100) O c7) tri 69 MLS 1 Conv. Mtge N co o O v O) 3 -7 -0 0 TO >-- 40, ODP /080`1. 090' l u0 o FWAICA f- cv Deck BkFP -1 z KE,WSO i °O O M c`7 69 _ $113.101 vim) o o c+) C,1 N Subject 6028 Danube MLS Conv. Mtge O B4 -52 O N C 'CD of 0 0 O • + CO O CO act to FWA/CA y'1 Tuck -2 Deck O O KE,WSO ADDRESS 'X O a Sales Price Price /Gross Liv.Area Data Source Finance/Concessions Date of Sale/Time Location Site (sq.ft.) View Appeal /Const.Quality Age -Q 0 Room Count Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Q) e CD O CO E t� Functional Utility Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency Garage/Carport Porch, Patio, Deck Fireplace(s) etc. Fence, Pool, etc. t9 .Q Q Z Adjusted Sales Price 1 FROM THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. PHONE NO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12 : 38PM P13 $129,9001 cc) r 43 4p9 - - 03 .* LO N N COO O) CO O •ct tn 4 999 ($1,000 roo 'Z$) 00£$) (000'£t) (0 0 49 to O 0 49 C3) CO M m o O Ch _ N 7 1� U' _ 10 C0 O .4•" CO d CO d ti .�- eT 1 FWAJCA _• CV FP -1 Fence _ KE,WSO.SEC+ '}} O' cb z O Cr) N CO C� CO CO CT 49 O CO 69 Co N bN9 COO O N 03 CAA 4 C7 ti 00z$ 003 000'L$ CO Q' N M_ O •V MLS 1 Conv. Mtge 1 c•-) CO U 23,600 20 °, Q °' ■ ca 1 956/644 ti N U Att. -2 3 Seas.Pch Wood Stove None KE 6990 6W 2ndAvenue C> CO ,- N 49 CV •~- 49 CO N d9 000`£$) CD CO CV CH pi 32,250] c, 19 c, 0 !R cz, 69 <=:. 49 ooze 003 000'z$ co N 49 1 $142,558 MLS CIN Mtge 1 CO 51,332. 1 Avg/Gd 1 d N d -O j '1LI FWANCA 1 473 2W BirchStreet O CO al- $121.37 _ ER r0oo'£$) 11111111�l N 49 49 00l$ (000'z$) p NN r 69 MLS Cony. Mtoe Lake,Park N C D fi N 1 FWANCA Att. -2 L. Deck, Patio FP -2 None KE,SEC 6789 3W Shadow Lake Drive E. CD $118.67 $1,3351 1(ooa'zs) O 49 I 32,2501 F1ll1I 009$ 00z$ $147,310 MLS FHA Mtae CJ7 0> B3 -66 IH Avg/Gd 1 Avg/Gd tF FWAICA 7. F- Att. -2 x CU p Q U-. OUON 1 KE,WSO Subject #5 843 Orange Street °p rn CV N 49 O $8,743 7.77 tO c`b CO- CA MLS FHA Mtae 1 CO rnN LC? CO 10,108 Homes - N Avg/Gd r.. 1 1,272 O O o) 91'1 Ll£ F FWANCA FF Shed 1 KE,WSO ADDRESS O CL CL CO PricelGross Llv.Area 1 O co Ca CI N C uNi y U 0 `a3 C c LL. E E CP O 2 CZ CI Location co c. 11, CO ti7 5 c V d d Q O 'C7 7 C..) V E O Ct m -‹ Cr: J y C7 Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility c O N . T v N �V u1 c W Garase /Ca •.rt Porch, Patio, Deck Fireolace(s) etc. v O d V ii w W CO O 'p Q Z y n as a IA �C FROM : THE TAYLOR APPRAISAL CO. • PHONE HO. : 6125429381 Jul. 17 2000 12 ::SE'1PM P14 C O $127.85 $12,341 $1,000.00 $0 ($4.000) ($6,495) CD (- O .- - O J N CO c..; MLS Cash 4/98 8366 13,000 AwninA C poop --- ti — CO ii-5 c ¢ Q = Y CL) Cl 2 ti C • 6W !Drive O (D p Q) O O O CD O 0 _ N co CO N M O O LC O c� O O O O O 4N4 CZ f` CC t4A 77G 1 rAfIll ." O N Av /Gd O O a CT) ¢ U.. Q L °- ) ui CO � O (1) O O m N 49 CV e• CO r"' bq II- — O CO N N W O N l's- (O to O N O ti CA O O (r) 49 O O )— Q. p O O O .4. CA O O r-- to O O N (/9 $21,2081 nnu a> Elsj eL ; N O N i I 1,170 1 $2,1701 1,040 o 1'..• N O < N Q L. Deck,Patiol $2,7001 None 1 N Ll u- auoN 1001$ I auoN KE,SEC 1 KE O 473 2W Birch Street 'i1iIiJ cl MLS OD r CO 0 N Lake,Park ($3,000) _Avg /Gd $133,500 CO OD dT 1 $1.335 O O G%! O 64 - - N E9 $3,745 N d4 O 1•- 49 O CO. 4 } Q 1� - C7 O CO N t._. ti 44 r' 49 6789 Shad42.Lak w CO 1 FHA Mtge CO B3f6 1 13,050 Pond Avg /Gd co • °• N LCD °) ` ^ ■ ■ (v < Deck 1 — o w W KE,WSO 0 io dl r- df 0 o fA 1 $10,755 iiii uii Subject 5 Oran e J VA Mtge CO m ° Homes Avg /Gd 28 a ? Q ° to N C.) "-- o a N ° CV i. FWA/CA F N Q 3Seas, Patio FP -2 Shed,Fence Q O Coe W _` ct O ° a Q 0 c CID (ti J N c c o W C O U u_ t!� CO (II a c m C>¢ ai C U d . m Q c c 0 C o o CC Gross Living Area Basement/Finish Rooms Below Grade = m c Heating /Cooling Energy Efficiency_ Garage /Carport Porch, Patio, Deck tU CD 0' CU w Fence, Pool, etc, Extras Net. Adj. (total) Adjusted Sales Price July 20, 2000 Mr. Dennis E. Taylor, President The Taylor Appraisal Company 5955 Golden Valley Road, Suite 201 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Re: Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Mr. Taylor: You submitted a preliminary appraisal letter to the City Attorney for the referenced project on July 17, 2000. In the letter, you indicated the City Engineer should request this type of research "six months to a year in advance, so that it can be adequately done ". For your information, the City Council formally directed the City Attorney to obtain property appraisals, and I was directed to assist him, on February 14, 2000. The definite need for appraisals was also discussed informally at a public hearing held in November of 1999. I can assure you that I knew this was a critical piece of information for the City Council and the residents to consider as part of this project. It was certainly my intent that the appraiser would have sufficient time for the analysis to be "adequately done ". Sincerely, John M. Powell, P.E. City Engineer C: L. Waite Smith, City Administrator B. Wessel, Community Development Director W. Hawkins, City Attorney 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • • AGENDA ITEM 7 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: David Snell, 600 62nd Street, Minor Subdivision and Variance VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: David Snell is requesting a minor subdivision and variance to split 10 acres from a 37 acre parcel at 600 62nd Street. The property has been in the Snell family for over 50 years. The site is Zoned Rural and guided for rural development through 2020 in our draft comprehensive plan. The proposed parcel would have 230' of width on 62nd Street. The Zoning Ordinance provides that parcels in the Rural Zoning District have a minimum of 330' of lot width, therefore, a variance for 120' in lot width is being requested. The Ordinance also provides that "80% of the lot area may be comprised of areas which are platted as street rights -of -way, is below the 100 year flood elevation, or lies within city watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies as defined by the ordinance ". In other words, 20% of the new parcel must be upland. The survey document indicates that 2.35 acres are wetland leaving 7.65 acres of upland. Sewer and water are not available to serve this site, however, adequate space is provided for an on -site septic system and an alternate. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Mr. Snell believes a hardship exists in the fact that there is a septic system and drainfield • for the dwelling at 600 62nd Street between the home and the new parcel that limits the • • • available width for the new parcel. Staff did suggest that he consider creating this 10 acre parcel on the west side of the existing home, however, that area contains a considerable amount of wetland with patches of upland limiting its usability. Additionally, Mr. Snell's parents have some outbuildings and fencing on this west side of their home which they would like to retain. For Council information, eleven (11) parcels were previously created on the south side of 62nd Street that do not meet the 330' width requirement. These lots were approved at a time when smaller lots were permitted. They include: • Six (6) lots @ 153' in width ( + / -) • One (1) lot @ 165' in width • One (1) lot @ 250' in width • Three (3) lots @ 150' in width (corner of Ware Road and 62nd Street) Staff is also concerned about the future extension of West Shadow Lake Road. This state aid route is indicated in our Transportation Plan as continuing from 62nd Street south to Co. Rd. J. some time in the future. The extension would need to be located somewhere within Mr. Snell's proposed 230 feet of frontage. Although it is unlikely that the City would extend this roadway without a development plan or request from the property owner we do need to consider the location of this future roadway when locating new buildings on the property. Mr. Snell indicated he has no intention of further development of the parcel at this time. In review of this subdivision and variance request we believe a hardship to the land does exist in the configuration of the wetland area and location of the septic system and drain field. There are eleven (11) existing lots on 62nd Street that are less that 330' in lot width and less than 10 acres in size. The proposed subdivision does meet the 10 acre area requirement and the 20% upland requirement. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 14th meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated for the future reconstruction of 62nd Street. Currently there is 16.5' of right -of -way from the centerline, the City would require an additional 23.5' along the entire frontage of both parcels to provide 40' of right -of -way as 62nd Street is classified as a State Aid Route with an 80' required right -of -way. 2. Any building construction on the 10 acre parcel shall be located a minimum of 100' from the west property line to avoid the future extension of West Shadow Lake Drive. 3. Park Dedication shall be collected as required in the Subdivision Ordinance. OPTIONS: • 1. Approve Minor Subdivision and Variance with conditions outlined above. 2. Deny Subdivision and Variance request. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • ono d°4 • amomdf rang a ©oa ttn et Q+ • trnorooegolIMMEli �0�0 mil Q Qi:p o 2,a ©Q ©mQ is E©th11'!es ©l ffirk artnv R n ��I�G POs �:� ,.,.. ... ■ 33 CORP RATE L MI S OF 5 SEP. 1974 ) NOV. 1978 MAR.1980 SEP. 1981 DEC .1982 JULY 1985 DEC. 1985 REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. JAN. 1987 MAY 1988 AUG. 1989 FEB. 1991 FEB. 1992 FEB. 1993 MAY 1994 • SCALE 1" = 1500' REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. NOV. 1994 JAN. 1996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 AUG. 1999 1/4 1/2 MILE 3/4 CM/NTT-110 SHADED AREA DENOTES PARK LOCATION CI' CENTS iA wow I - --t Mai 1 Pine StreetQ ai LI Carl Street 111 Main Street Lois Lan = ,r 77th Str at #ems .• Oak Lane • • Ilac Street v1J31ch ? ztkj Peltier Lake 1 1 nth Street East ire O \\oO Elm Street M,arsf lan Lake Centerville Lake Rice Lake 1 CO 0 O CA 0 O Birch Street 62nd % Street Ash Street 0 CD 1 Cal Holy Drive Main Street Centerville ,g Birch Street 0) N 0 80th Street 0 ai z N 4 24th Ave. North LEGEND Principal Arterial "A" Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Street Existing Proposed i SRF Cam ux Gwue.Iuc. 1997 CITY OF LINO LAKES TRANSPORTATION PLAN FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM J 10 Kemper & Associates, Inc. 721 Old Hwy. 8 NW New Brighton, MN 55112 Telephone: (651) 631 -0351 • Fax: (651) 631 -8805 email: kemper@pro- ns.net JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION 0 THE SMELL PROPERTY (5Ma12199ooz) 99002 a3WWVaa •M 13•0 OLOHd MIV Mad 3M1 3381 0 -4 0 x z m dVW NOLL03S 3IVH 83d 1 1 A z v z 3 D V) 0 0 Z • • • \ ( Fl- Z D FF 0C> 1-1-13> NVPi 0°0r-o +Orr1-D �OC>O NOZO 00 11 73 0 fv*1�m D OOK c0 orn r n v3 0-x40 fP+IOpp fM* ND Oz NDgf�1* ��� co 0 >z.TD, 0zx, 0D� ZD0 0�D r0a rmD d mv0 z0 Z0 D r 660.00 'S' i? (.1.1 00 F "9 R2 �`,(\y p? o�p 435.60 QS:el 72,3 R 1.4/ pR 1 332iL ONlLSIX3 C z m m O 0 23 13 00v 0 � s m C' ' D v O D0 Z r t>j 0 r g CI 01 1 • 0 G� I Cho Ct w z� IWzZ CO 0 O N r ci OCo cn 0) iV A UNE 444.36 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 1490 FEET OF THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 32 N 00 °31'23" W 657.93 657.90 EAST UNE OF THE WEST 1490 FEET OF xD�OCnm� THEN 1/2 OF THE z° a z 0 r SE 1/4 OF SECTION 32 O oNO Z °D m 10 xmik-N u) m 1- -t m-izm pi 8OOo2 _Z Q rny0xim Z 77 =1 2.,.- vxrn G7 G7 N 0 Dc K _ pug =z0� m-I DmZoz AM�rn0''c'' C 0 �'x�"Z'x10 M -<>N o Z -T1 ommoDC om °oMzcM 77 D r'l lEw mO �0 -< DAOSD�rD c� D vmm {NZ ° � �'1m0*-Ii m - ( m0m-m 0o 0)00 r iAA0 Om. n ZDDAA D T c73 o NO-1rn0�y X xlDAm O mqN� D Z1 1n � m04s 7468 rn O 23 1,1 D > OZV'�r�'r mx M�ZO 0 vCn�f7mp Am mrn- rt- a.DA_m ��-� x - _ srw m0M--.. • D m'.:,),., (Om xi i mx 0 - �z r mornoZZ Z z53 or mmoC2 Z0z rn -4mD ou D� O0- OrASMVzm13 DD pm O 1 ° �ZD- 1m0)m23g5 DDZ- D1XN'D 0 Op �D Z D1Dm va0m z C O z 171 Z O 0 0 0 V) p r7 Vl tlf m m fXi 0 G D Z J P11 N --4 DD ▪ -C 0N� N1,, M MI 7 _ X t7 --1 0 A N x -C m� 0 � rn -. m — I � Z r mr,mZ 0 Z Al Z 71 D O N m 't rrn m Z 0 0 ?m t-8V10 < _ c0m1 g m- a ZO m =yx 0_ 073 vaiAamr'im* Z7—I 0 F es - _4 Is) X‘...0 C ■/*,.. 0 M 0 -71 zo m -im co �o r* D ,ornm Z A � -10P r aj1 -1 O O p0 m w DZ 0 0 I Fit D aI 0TO 0 A • AO ° °po�oFsFd 1 IFS I J I I rt S 00 °31'23" E 1280.81 / / °coC // V DZ n 0 / 23 m Ake 0NX -...,„.z p > v 0 m Z 01)>0 • A LINE 230.00 FEET WESTERLY OF z 0 r AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY m /m r• • UNE OF THE WESTERLY 1490 FEET 00 0 m g m OF THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF D IV c0 p z z SECTION 32 SAID LINE IS ALSO {_.J z 13 1,260 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL, • C° ■ ; • • PROPOSED SITE & GRADING PLAN FOR THE DAVID SNELL & ROSE MILLER PROPERTY KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING 721 OLD HIGHWAY 8 N.W. NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 651- 631 -0351 FAX 651 - 631 -8805 NOTE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 'EGARDING SOIL BORINGS SEE CLIENTS S01 S AND PERC TEST REPORTS. SOILS & PERC TESTS BY: ZIERKE SOIL TESTING PHONE: 651 -462 -2294 98 1 EDGE OF BITUMINOUS 0 20 40 1 INCH EQUALS 40 FEET BASIS FOR BEARINGS: ANOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM BASIS FOR ELEVATION: CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT 62NDTREET EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 896 89 PROPOSED —g9 ADDITIONAL B GHT OF WAY 896 FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE n 3- 5" 9A COT .WOOD WETLAND AREA / s (NOT DELINEATED) .69 rn WOOD B99 OTTONWOOI 25.56 00 B 0 11C� PI" S 30" COTTO 9" BIRC 8" CRA APPLE 24" BIRCH NOTE: EXIS G DRIVEWAY TO ;E USED FOR 896 PROPOSED HOUSE CMP V 894.53 WIRE FENCE NOTES: 10" POPLA B -4 EXISTING DITCH P -2 • ecy• LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR LINE PERCOLATION TEST SOIL BORING PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE DIRECTION OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE • DENOTES SET SURVEY MONUMENT MARKED KEMPER 18407" 100.50 —898 100.23 83.78 B -2 896 5" CRAB • APPLE NOTE: PROPOSED LOWEST FLOOR (GARAGE) IS 4.55 FEET ABOVE THE NEAREST RECORDED MOTTLED SOIL 696 9 1 CUENT TO VERIFY WITH CITY ANY POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS �894 ADJACENT WITH THE DITCH OR WETLANDS 2 PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO BE LOCATED WITH A GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 651 -454 -0002 69 N 0) N N 9 WETLAND AREA EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 20086 (20086A.DWG) D.B. TODD HOLEN EDGE OF TREES ELEVATION SUMMARY 6 -3 = 897.05 (GROUND) MOTTLED SOIL = 897.05 (36" DEPTH) PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR = 901.6 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR = 902.27 PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR = 911.27 CERTIFICATION WIRE FENCE f') '23" E 2588. 0 0 O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN SOTA. MARK D. =MPER PL c 1R 7 S DATED THI-F=DAY OF4� 2000 SHEET 2 OF 2 AGENDA ITEM 7 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: Final Plat, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition and Development Agreement CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition on April 12. The preliminary plat includes lots for 239 new houses and 7 existing houses, for a total of 246 lots. A final plat for the first phase (3rd Addition) was approved in September 1999. The 4th Addition is the next phase. The 4th Addition includes 56 lots. The development agreement is ready including financial guarantees. The City Attorney reviewed the title work and found it in order. The final plat substantially conforms with the approved preliminary plat. The preliminary plat approval in April 1999 included a number of conditions. Several of the conditions merit discussion, here. One was that the project include an open space management plan. Like the 3rd Addition, this will be part of the development agreement for the 4th Addition and will be backed by financial guarantees. Typically, staff ensures that a development agreement is complete before bringing a final plat to the Council for approval. The conditions of approval on this project require that the development agreement is to be reviewed by the City Council. This came from questions about development agreements in general and how certain elements of this project would be addressed. Since the condition was part of the approval on this project, we have attached the development agreement for the 4th Addn., as we did for the 3rd Addn. final plat. The agreement can be approved at the same time as the approval of the final plat. Another condition of approval specified limits on the number of building permits that can be issued in the development on a year -by -year basis. Permits not issued one year can be carried over to the next year. As shown in the tables below, the 4th Addition will carry the development through year 2001. Approved Phasing Plan year maximum annual permits allowed maximum cumulative total 1999 75 75 2000 60 135 2001 45 180 2002 59 239 Clearwater Creek 4th Addn. July 24, 2000 page 2 Lots in 3rd and 4th Additions final plat total lots existing houses new house lots 3rd Addition 129 1 128 4th Addition 56 4 52 total 185 5 180 Building Permits Issued Through July 18, 2000 maximum total permits 135 through year 2000 actual number of permits 70 issued through 7/18/00 remaining for year 2000 65 Only 70 permits have been issued to date in the entire development. This is less than the 1999 allotment, and leaves 65 before reaching the maximum limit of 135 through year 2000. We will monitor the number of building permits to ensure proper implementation of the phasing plan. The phasing plan has been incorporated into the development agreements. There are three lots in the southeast corner of this 4th Addition that cross the boundary of the current MUSA. (Lots 14, 15, 16, Block 5.) These lots must be included in the final plat in order to construct the roads and utilities in that vicinity. Until MUSA is available, these lots will not receive building permits. This restriction is included in the development agreement as well. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat and development agreement. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • dt F �i i! J LfE, " ,1 'gill ►1� p}� iCf Iit iit: tz� �b �' ti /1k �y. 1 f;4717 1 L � � ' 1 f :1 r'" ; r -' C7 p: IL�J �L.� 1 • ,./., ,,, \ ( ; b ' 4. . y ti O Ik‘ 41_ � 75% p "4, kikiL, • • CLEAN WA TFI-� CREIK 4TH ADDITION CITY OF LINO COUNTY OF ANOKA, I SEC.25 -T31 N -R22W i. 1 r- • r\ � • 1 w -r r- r. r• r - - i r. r. -_ � r r 1 ., i r � 1 i ��, I 1 F- I' t! 111/ /\ I F- t! I F! h- H- K -North Lin o /NEI 4 -5E1/4 '/ I \I 11 ,, I I I,I I I I I I I\ I 35 - _ \ . L_ L_' 1' 1 r 1' 1 , L_, 1 . I 1 L_ L_ . ♦ 1 (A/ee the E -W 1 4 line) r L i / 1 L/ 1 I I\/ I r (Also A< El /4E /4 7/4 $$ t _ I Comer) •e.TS_TJ1N -R 2W -_ .- sa97953E _333W - -_ -- _ Se<IS- TJIN -R ?2W T 1 ` I ' 1 7890• / ' � - - -- - I I I • ,_:\-:- i N I\I r / 0 - "-k'ET ' 8 \3 1 _ 44,vo I }g N , `, _ .�' she. \_ ,_4 ,o _ _� , rs • ; b:e GRAPHIC SCALE ` _O 074' .-,7 ?6,66,9 4 on •0 0 50 .o 120 ;I - -.Una Pare. WA Ne.U' tM I L' g g - 1 '� 11 Ncl/•- 1 /4- s.e.25- r51N -Rnw , H Mi MI 1 °j 6749 '1 589'39'53 "E 431.76 it 1 SCALE r FEET ,-NW Corner of S J321M feet of I f7 1 '~. O '�,/ North Lhe of s JJ200 fast of , , a JJOOB� 1 inch = 60 feet 1 N 590.08 feet of NEl /4 -SE7 /1 N. 590.08 Mt of NEI /4 -522/4 , 589'39'53 "E ti I y� 0 U T L O T J9�76 D I ee15 -731N-R2214 See15- 731N- R21w -- ` 589:T9 5J E' -1-10.5.71-- -1 7" 100, 00 "- - 1 y ! '° Prn.�/II 589 4J 20 ' -y South Lhs I M T5808 / h0 NBB36'S8'W 166.36 588365B�E 60.00 feet I NEI /4- 52'1/4 , _ \ /' b c 60.00 , 730.00 1\30.o-el u NOTES: I 5x25 -TJIN -R22W 0 `i 2S 'Z' I I / m OD\9 ' 1l 589 4 .520 E r O - DENOTES I/2 INCH BY I< INCH t , A y ^ Ie Ian %� ='N5 157.00 JO IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET, MARKED • 1 / i" >` Iq I� ` '.. - I 1 �'I `\' "RCS l0947'TIC CAP INSCRIBED • 14 c'�r•.n / /!/ 2 IS'. I� yam . gl 1 a l ° C • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND W Ia <-t „' i "01* r ' , 125 -1' J \ I e I . - DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT I'r _ Y I O / Ib L 589.43.20E W J - O .� r _ O L 2_1 • 1, 1 I I ' t nL0 • I 94.95 o 0 r 1 Q '41d O -0 O FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE t t 11 `/ '' �J ,�1�0 568.025 p3 ' �r 1 loi 135.00 I I,�Jo r 157.00 �1 1 �' OF FC.2E SOUTHEAST ISUASER OF QUARTER <�y ' \ y , O v D c� / / / / / gl $ I 13 I p o I 2 �/] , 18 h \ HAVE A BEARING OF N89'39'S3'W. s • '' °7.00`0 • r/ I 1 g1 �I Ib JO 1 wl Jff.r'� I� be \ � ` •O� X30% / /�\ \ o I ■ 589'4320"5 J L 589'4320"E ' j w� \ _.` N5360 \/ \ 1 m �O r 0 0 r -0 o? 22'1'4 <,,t \ / \ w f" o 135.00 W 157.00 , DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AR lie " ^ / / \ \ Li w :5•.' v .� n SHOWN THUS: I a '"- ' \� • / u 1 a 1 0 ^1 + 1 R'' ;o " ,may BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND 40201NIN • ; �'n tY i v\ 1 io O o di, LINES, AND 10 FEET IN wIorH AND ADJOINING t''''' _ \ \0 Q,\ \v 1' 0 1 2 g I = g $ �_'e RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE I N I` `I .. '��9� / /'\\ \\ 1 \cam 1 g a \\ 5 SHOWN ON THE PLAT. \ \ 1 Wyi I -SauM Line °f N. s9aoe '9 4`325.. . , / \NN °\ \ \ 5.13'9 50- J it� - 70.00 J 1DL 135.00 '� 30 JO L J JJ 5- �- _ 1 /e.t , Nb%N.ifl /4 3-49-4 49, �:'' I \N �\ ■- 82.71 .7 9 0 p 0 /5700 tp -� -5 • sw s, rnr °f s J.2oD fe•t •I 1 See.25- TJIN -R22W ..P.2.5,•,.. 041'. < p \ \ 5D �, • R 0 A D 1 '/ N. 590.08 h•t of NE7 /4 -SF7 /4 I ,: /'\ \ U 3.09 / I I `. 1',- Sec.25 -TJIN -R22W + Z7.9 \ \ \0\ //1 J L'7-NW l- J 1. ! \ ' - - - -�° \ �'- e2'1 - -' .rC 235.00 I 22aoo - .9 'I 2 _. 10-1 I I r 10 58979'537- 49129 �LO��cca�t 1� / \ \`�o. • {r�, 'OL I 689'43•20T 455.00 ---1--1 L - - - • Comr of S 332.00 feet of 1.-North LH of S 35200 reef of k" \ "c' :-r\ \� 501 ✓ sJ30' 0 I ,`� o I N. 92208 feel of NEI /4 -SEl/4 N. 922. feet oI NEI /4 -SET /4 F'�f \ +'� ,\ 09/ K �R I i ~ it, } S•c15 -TJIN -R22W S.c.25- TJIN -R22W ? C \C) 1 S9/\ `ter' \ \\ \5/1\ 1� O O ■ b1. �,N/ \ \\ % \ \ D /62. �! 29� T 7B�g0 12.1 f-- 75.00 -_l -- 75.00 - l r_ - 119.00] r� -� - 71.70 41153.00 0 r .`COs,1 �. ( \ ' e ; \, q/ r 6.15'0 I -t 49 Iti.63 r i JJ la . 2 - W£T` ._1 \. \ \ \u A\) • �5• _ 1,o � 1 i s 1 t, Q•�sDO�s�ow1)3 IN . l w \a1 •� \" //5 Ap ‘8.,6.4-- /ry / P \. • •.._ I`.I SP, • 1,.- .. AND � 7, P\ \o. .'. °nI W W W 3 V - L. J i l� 1 ._ I1 \ 61• y..�i '/ `1 %9A `te, \ \\ 6905 /D�0 S�h %�/ t � .`r, b o 4 b .., \ W .i ''I �/o. h Iyu • "+ 1, � ,90.0:9 / W� ifs $ v 5�5 \ \ p, r�i '. I oro 1 p • pr :"..1 z � �- -3 r• h • • pp 1 /V6 ?• /S 5 "`� 563 5A/ /."'\ \ \ �\ \5 , `' : / \ / i 1 °`J 8 :��,. 4,1, _- ry I i O ,`S4 •3-.• 6'1 ?12 // \ \ N 5 '$\ \ \C. ,1//39 \M'`Ff'' `tj ` •:�/ /2 I `�_ ; 49 -� h �'1R6 °\Z I 1\ • �\\\0 .�NB�'/172..2.. .'W �\ �Z �/ % \\ \a \\ \ / 10 �1 }��\ 4ti5 6 /� 1 L o 98.00 1J L 75.00 J L- 75.00 -J L- 119.70 -� + /- 253.00 J i • p HoL / �0 ,/\I\ j \d • \/t6• poo' 61 A► />> - • -0 -0 `i 0 - •.3.3.00 A i 1 I N ... 0• 1 / m e b / / / ,� \ N N \' .- : A •1` R E> j, � \ 1D I 589'39'53 "E 553.00 .1 4 818 �8 �� �� 11 r 'u\ \\r \\ \� // 90 0 Y� i i i Gw�"r\ :� p T ,wt � r `� / A :g/ /0 2 \"PI Id \ \ /35 Q 69 uo 6`J I/ a, 1^ �\•,' ,� x / / t I 1 `l •. H of to \ \ / /61' �j 1�. 23 • i! \6u ,' \ , 3D o \�- I /1 / ' .. �'t'S 21 1` of 11.1 V L'./ \0.,1,9 , ' � P \w I r - I , 1,'". $ • P �sD a, 1 1 1 /,8 • 1 69 \�5 '?2\1‘2• L 2894320E J O r- 1 60 I \ o s1 \2�0 / / 1 9171 X/9 85'2 230• tf 1. .7 ( \•'.;i • y 01`,'2 •"� S ?' � I 1 \,,a,.15_,'59-1-1' 1^.151 - / to o A'• Ip 1 ' • N D \ f\ /\°'' o r *ss'.9 a• - , rz.7t \/ X56 w .- �r owg 12 o o. \ N62 u o :I .0.' n m U7 u u 8 ,_ A 3 . , , y�yb .h I P>1 3 3`\ N. -., `\ � I \1 ` 1 mR 1 Yr v I N I I r'8 N; 1..4",;- • - -1?-23 )� .55.131 t- - -� - - - '0 ' •_• l I S89'39'53 "E '4,r..eh 4ry 260.97 -�- 1 D.DO / 53207 553.00 t o wH =;h .' 'S'1p11 Va _ ,JO. DO 30.00, L 'J S00VJ124'w " �� Y .2 ��t O ` "oi 60.00 - • N88'50'2019 140.14 • h. \n .,pry ?B9. gg x,55.1310 5887653E oZw 41 0 "'` "° eti -MATCH L I N E " A "-' PARK MIDWEST (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. /' SW Comer of S 33200 / ` ^. -,.. -, f/ fa f f N. 922.06 fool L NEI /4 -561/4 5ec25 -23111 -R22W- / `� •' ''/ East Lhe of • r- NW1 /4 -SEI /4 SO 1 •S.r7 ••%if i e of N1/4 -1/4 :7; . L-- - - - - -- ��,� 999. 4.. N0072'S5'E JJ200 r ! I ` r 0071'S5'W _ _ - _ SJ2.00 l��`, % I� 1 -West Line of NE1 /4 -SEI /4 1 N== 1122 N2� Sec25 -TJ1N -R22W I R._ aeonQ IPY `u'7R N.'' i. ' G 1PL o\ •i it — \r2Y :' O ya (0 \\ �> i TiSsJ \:✓ (r tr . T'> >., .\‘',!,: 4C) .� ' s 3 4p. i� . `' A w _ -' ` //i ......0` .43 � �' / /.,..\ \!9. / //12.01 \ m. v. ' 0 \ I• \.r 1 ,01' g1, %> \ oC) \m`6 n`M ` W \ q,c 7 ,A? i ?,e O 1 4\? ,,— 1 \ R. \� �:capcsts \ N A DRAINAGE ANO I b 1.1.1./L URUTY EASEMENT -` 10 r__YI r 4 �• al 1 •i alos 110076'40E y jl 135.35 \ Z f l O ri� \4i'`�� p 1� 14 18 1 ~ Ito T 0 W N 165.54 \ I • m'100' 16'40 "E N0274. 59 E 163.26 ■ti (1 , 1 -..1 r - 7 l 104.97 o _1 58.29 • / I . u - I— t-DRA1NAGE AND 71 1 UOUTY EASEMENT. I0 mI Ui 4lo a I Iy h R 0 A D 361.46 ' Eos1 L.. of NE1 /4 -5EI /4 527.00 Sec25 -731N-R22W 2260! 5E comer of N.256o6 Feat of NEI /4- 581/4 S.25 -7.11N-R22W "e � c () 1 y O o I TI f o� NT\x • n (i) 85'605 � ' \• t,.lgt -, r -r i 1•i�091 +)/ , -r I--- 0g 0 it:33 ti pL/a ,�h �a N 0 P1, 40 11 o0i /° X44 �q // �8 A �_. 5`0 0`'/ i 00 7( . of tc. 00 .Ob . �t�/ ,t4 ti•fyj5 ,� 4.... / / ^ � ..../0,.., � �S3 �li,�� �'�' V to, '647\ S\ i 14r / /q' -foot the ofNWI /4- SEl /4// `6 Oti, asp ��'\^ k '' p4 0; m� � / //� „A/4"-foot i See15- 131N -R11W ..... o' Vi, �J ^ \ of a / / -if lh. o! xfl / + -s[I% / + X O �\ ':, / o 25- T31N -R22W Ig j / • `5 09/s�4 % u y ' 9 • 37..77 i Jar 40^/r v t6 /ti`• , \ op 76,5 • ♦ � J. / R / 4 \ S08 0.4ly 2i m, ~ i ' ��� I b b - - -i 002" \ '4t3- i I I. I L—— N079'o3. f - ✓+as - Ib L ft J 1147.57 1335.20 O f W N N00' 16'40'E S133HS t+ dO V 133HS • Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. • A �k i co 0 m 0 8 8 • N00' 12'55 "E\ • • \ \ �` c,cT. o9 `c,690�pLrt`.o\P 913‘, 94 / �l4 ,titit 01' 1• S* loc�9 9I . i s 0�5 :` �ry�a ao'rs 6'w G o °opi, ti� ��� 69 0 66, 0`0 00 s $/4a\I / — \ OOO CT1 \_/ __� Z ti , ` 1 // T) / VI N• / sr V Old �� / • ri I / 0 L;,-- � East LNe o/ SWI /4 -scl /4 ` • I 317.15 ( sects- prN -R22w - N007255T l 70LiB.44 - - _ _ I N(X772'SSE /r 1125.59- -_ - -- ' 1 Life o/ SE7 /4 -581/4 I S..25- TJ1N -R22W s ss . 0) D s0 ,,s,co sr 0. 3'. 2 4 tiCb ^1!• 3 ,•LL `08fOSp2 so -6.0 •j ?�Y d� O. • • • \sue • • • • • • • 20 Z281 ,+ 0 N • • • • • • • - -' Z. 0 N00' 16'40 "E • O • • • • • • • / — • • _ / —Tl • • -East Lisa or SE1 /4 -SE1/4 • S..25 -TJJN -R22W 784.54 `\ __1 1741.63 0 / I I I I III I I I I I I I I W (Pi? ibp• • j:jj 6'r19?I V37,9 NOIJIUU V • DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Clearwater Creek Fourth Addition THIS AGREEMENT made this day of ,19_, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Gor -Em LLC whose address is 10738 Hanson Blvd. N.W., Coon Rapids, MN 55453 hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Clearwater Creek Fourth Addition, hereinafter called "Subdivision "; and WHEREAS, the Developer requested that the City construct and finance certain improvements to service the plat; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the plat; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City installed improvements to the benefited property. WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of final plat; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: that the I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ". B. Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ". H. DEVELOPER'S IMPROVEMENTS A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan, preliminary street and utility plan, a surface water management plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements, said contractor • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion. All Developer improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grading Plan a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with maximum two foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site grading. Other items as listed in the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). 2. Erosion Control Plan a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall submit a Turf Establishment Plan which details topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 3. Tree Preservation Plan a) Developer will provide a tree preservation plan prior to final plat approval which shall be in accordance with the City Tree Preservation Policy and the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). Developer shall plant a boulevard tree for each side of a lot which abuts a street. Species, size and location shall be determined by the City Forester. Said plan shall be approved by the City and implemented prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall remove, dispose of, or treat all dead and diseased trees in accordance with the City Forester's recommendation before building permits will be issued. page 2 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition 4. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the Developer shall complete items ll.A.l, ll.A.2, and ll.A.3 as listed above. b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the approved Grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other regulatory agencies. c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. g) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy. h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded. i) The front 50 feet of the lots, the street right -of -way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility construction. j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion. k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of building permits. page 3 • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition 1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. m) The developer's engineer shall certify, in writing, that all grading complies with the grading plan. 5. Final street grading, subbase, gravel base, bituminous binder course, and concrete curb and gutter. 6. Park trail grading, subbase, gravel base, and bituminous surfacing. If required, installation of boardwalk trails or acceptable substitute or prefabricated walkway panels. 7. Storm sewers when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances. 8. Sanitary sewer, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services and other appurtenances. 9. Water, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances. 10. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot corner irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan - guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. 11. The Developer agrees to maintain, at all times before acceptance of the streets by the City, an access road suitable for use by emergency, police and fire department equipment. The adequacy of such road shall be the sole determination of the City. Furthermore, such access road shall be located no more than 150 feet from any structure built within the subdivision. 12. The Developer shall be responsible for street and storm sewer maintenance, including curbs, boulevards, sod and street sweeping, ditch cleaning and pond dredging until the project is compete and accepted by the City. 13. The Developer shall only be responsible for such maintenance until completion of the subdivision if caused by Developer, its purchasers, builders or contractors. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The developer shall maintain a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. The page 4 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris resulting from construction by the Developer, its agents or assigns within five (5) days after notification by the City. 14. Street Lighting: a) Residential street lighting shall be owned by the City. Such street lighting system shall be installed, operated, and maintained by the electric utility company. City and electric utility company may enter into a contractual agreement on the rate and maintenance of the street lighting system. b) It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to pay for street lighting operation charges for the initial 15 months of operation of the system. 15. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, prior to approval of the final plat, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer's Improvements as determined by the City. All such easements required by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City shall determine. 16. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities. 17. The Developers shall make provision that all gas, telephone, cable TV and electric utility designs be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to construction of the streets. Following review and approval by the City, the Developer shall insure that all installation comply with applicable City, County and State design standards and show proof of security arrangements with said utility companies. 18. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description and completion dates are as shown on Attachment A. 19. Construction of Developer's Improvements: a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. page 5 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer's and City's Improvements as determined by the City. d) All Construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the developers expense and in a timely manner as determined by the City. 20. Guarantee a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit (1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer's Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. page 6 • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. (1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the warranty provisions of the agreement. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. III. CITY'S IMPROVEMENTS A. The City shall install the following described improvements to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth: 1. Storm sewer trunks. 2. Sanitary sewer trunks. 3. Water trunks. 4. Final wear course. B. Construction Procedures 1. All City improvements above shall be instituted, constructed and financed as follows: The City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429 and City Charter providing that such improvements be made and assessed against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if required by law, will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering such City Improvements. After preparation of the final plans and specifications by the City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and contract awarded for the installation of City Improvements under the City's complete supervision. C. Security, Levy of Special Assessments and Required Payment Therefore. 1. Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said City Improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow or letter of credit in an amount equal to thirty -five (35 %) percent of the total estimated assessments as established by the City Engineer. (See Attachment B) page 7 Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition 2. Said letter of credit or cash escrow including accrued interest thereon, may be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. That such cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the special assessments, except, the amount of such escrow or letter of credit may be reduced, upon the request of the Developer, at the City's option, but in no event shall be less than 35% of the outstanding special assessments against all properties within the Subdivision. The entire cost of the installation of such City Improvements, including any reasonable engineering, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be assessed against the benefited properties within the Subdivision in accordance with City policy existing the date of this agreement, in equal annual principal installments plus interest on the unpaid installments at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law. 3. All special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City Clerk in semi - annual installments over fifteen (15) years commencing on April 15 of the year after the levy of such assessment and on each September 15 and April 15 thereafter until the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full unless paid earlier. In the alternative, the City, at its option, may certify the entire assessment roll to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the Real Estate Taxes. In the event any payment is not made on the dates set out herein, the City may exercise its rights granted hereunder for such default. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the City Improvements and the special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. In the event the total of all City Installed Improvements is less than originally estimated by the City Engineer in his feasibility report, Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081. D. Required Payments of Special Assessments by Developer. 1. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns hereby agrees that within thirty (30) days after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residence on a lot located within the Subdivision which is assessed for the cost of such City Improvements, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees, at its own cost and expense, to pay the entire unpaid City Improvement Costs assessed or to be assessed under this agreement against such property. 2. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum of cash equal to one hundred twenty percent (120 %) of the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for such City Improvements that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the City shall page 8 • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arising from the payment based upon such estimate. Developer will be paid interest on all assessments paid before the levy of such assessments by the City at the bond interest rates paid by the City. E. Acceleration Upon Default. 1. In the event the Developer violates any of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein contained to be performed by the Developer, violates any ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat, or fails to pay any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder, after ten (10) days' written notice to the Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City may seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the security provided herein. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest the City may certify such outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor pursuant to M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attorney's fees, and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. Also, if Developer violates any term or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by Developer pursuant to this agreement the City, at its option, may refuse to issue building permits to any of the property within the plat on which the assessments have not been paid. IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract. page 9 • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition V. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the plat and the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See attachment B for Breakdown of costs): 1. Plat Review Fee 2. Planner Review Fee 3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost 4. Engineering a) Administration 5. Legal - Plat Review 6. Publications 7. Park Dedication Fee 8. Tree Preservation Policy 9. Street Lighting - Install/Operate 10. Traffic Signing Improvements 11. Boulevard Tree Planting 12. Street - Storm Sewer - Pond Maintenance 13. Sealcoating Fund 14. Aerial Photo Recovery Cost B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the developer shall make such additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow. VI. BUILDING PERMITS A. Building Permits 1. The Developer agrees to the following phasing schedule for Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition Phase 1 and subsequent additions, including the Fourth Addition: a. A maximum of 75 building permits will be granted in 1999. b. A maximum of 60 building permits will be granted in 2000. page 10 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition c. A maximum of 45 building permits will be granted in 2001. d. The remainder of the building permits will be granted in 2002. e. Any permits not used one year can be carried over to the next year. 2. The Developer agrees that building permits may be issued in accordance with the phasing schedule in VI.B.1. and upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council at which time all required Financial Security shall be in place with the City. The Developer further agrees that City Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Bituminous Base Construction of the Streets, and temporary street signs will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. 100% of grading in Clearwater Creek Third Addition Phase I will be completed, including revegetation of ponding areas, before any building . permits are to be issued for the Fourth Addition. VII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set out in City Ordinances as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed VIII. OCCUPATION OF PREMISE A. The Developer further agrees that they will not cause to be occupied, any premises constructed upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the gas, electric, telephone, and street improvements to the extent of the concrete curb, gutter and bituminous base required by this Development Contract have been installed, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this requirement as to a specific premises. Furthermore, the City shall have the right to limit the issuance of building permits for lots within the subdivision if such home construction should interfere with construction of the City's improvements. 1X. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. page 11 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition X. INSURANCE A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured>on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. XI. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. XII. VALIDITY A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. XIII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect 1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices 1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by page 12 • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. C. Final Plat Approval 1. The city agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this agreement and of all required petitions, bond and security. XIV. VIOLATIONSBUILDING PERMITS A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. XV. PARK DEDICATION A. Park dedication for Clearwater Creek Fourth Addition shall consist of: 1. All trails. 2. Paving of the trails with bituminous surface at Developer's cost. B. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of the developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover the cost of said property taxes. XVI. OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN A. The Developer and City shall perform the actions as described in the Open Space Management Plan (Attachment C). page 13 • • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES By By Developer Mayor ATTEST: By Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of , 19_. before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary public page 14 • • Development Contract Clearwater Creek 4th Addition STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA On this day of , of 19_, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be the , of , a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public page 15 • ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS SITE GRADING ONLY DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Creek 4th Addition NUMBER OF REU's: APPLICANT: Gor -em, LLC ASSESSED AREA (ac.): BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 1 SITE GRADING Bid Amount e $132,000 2 EROSION CONTROL NA RCWD 3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Bid Amount e $5,000 4 PARK & TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Bid Amount f (in other items) 5 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT $0 e (3rd addition) 6 STREET CONST. A. Base Course Bid Amount e $0 B. Wear Course Estimate e $0 7 STORM SEWER CONST. A. Trunk B. Lateral Bid Amount e $0 C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) $0.093 a $0 SANITARY SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,020 a $0 B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $875 a $0 C. Lateral Bid Amount e $0 9 WATERMAIN CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,154 a $0 B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $1,413 a $0 C. Lateral Bid Amount e $0 TOTALS: $137,000 $0 $0 NOTE: • See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study 7/19/00 Clearw Creek 4 ATTACHMENT B CITY FEES SITE GRADING ONLY DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Creek 4th Addition NUMBER OF REU's: APPLICANT: Gor -em, LLC ASSESSED AREA (ac.): BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 1 PLAT REVIEW FEE $3,900 b $5,000 2 PLANNER REVIEW FEE $1,500 b $0 3 ADMINISTRATION -3% OF CONST. 3% of const. a $0 4 ENGINEERING A. Plan/Plat/Grading Review $1,900 b $0 B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. $43,700 b $0 C. Construction Services $61,670 b $0 D. Construction Staking $0 b $0 E. City Engineering $6,500 b $0 5 LEGAL PLAT REVIEW FEE $1,310 b $0 6 PUBLICATIONS $250 b $0 7 PARK DEDICATION FEE $0 d $0 8 TREE PRESERVATION POLICY $5,200 b $0 Alk STREET LIGHTING INST. & OPER. $39,600 b $0 TRAFFIC SIGNING IMPROV. $6,200 b $0 11 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $29,475 b $0 12 STREET, ST. SWR. & POND MAINT. $6,000 b $0 13 SEALCOATING FEE $25,900 a $0 14 FEMA Processing Fee N/A $0 15 AERIAL PHOTO COST RECOVERY $11,790 a $0 16 OTHER a TOTALS: $0 0 $5,000 SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED Att. A Att. B Total X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $205,500 $0 $205,500 Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $0 $0 $0 Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) $0 $5,000 $5,000 NOTE: a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study 7/19/00 Clearw Creek 4 kock\otk 0 KJOLFIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 011140Or providing Sound. Balanced, Comprehenrive.Natural Resource Solutions MEMORANDUM To: Mike Quigley Gor -EM Front: Mark Kjolhaug Date: September 13, 1999 Re: Open Space Management Plan for Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition 1 General Approach and Strategy The following items represent general strategies utilized in developing area specific recommendations for restoration: 1. Reseed all areas disturbed by project grading with native prairie seed. mixtures — wet or rnesic — as appropriate. Manage these areas with mowing, chemical, and fire treatments until community is fully established. Long -term management by City could include spot chemical treatments as necessary, burns, or mowing. 2.. Kill existing weedy herbaceous plant communities and replace them with native prairie seed mixtures — wet ormesic — as appropriate. Manage these areas with mowing, chemical. and fire treatments until community is fully established. Long- term management by City could include spot chemical treatments as necessary, burns, or mowing. 3. Protect wooded areas and scattered significant trees. Remove invasive shrubs to allow for recovery of native herbaceous communities. Long -term management by the City would include monitoring and removal of invasive shrubs. 4: Protect quality wetlands with buffers and filter strips. Use signage to minimize dumping and mowing within wetland and buffers. Long -term management by City would include monitoring and enforcement. 5. Restore /supplement wetland hydrology when possible by blocking ditches or outleting storm water ponds. Wetland restorations, which affect wetlands on adjacent properties, are not recommended. 6. Restore herbaceous wetland plant communities when prudent by spraying, scraping, and reseeding. 4747 Richmond Road, Mound. Minnesota 55364 • Phone, 6r2- 472`4875 • Faxt 61.-a-.472 -I 0+0 c\I • 7. Remove spoil piles when possible without damaging trees or existing natural plant communities. 8. Remove trash when encountered. II. Specific Approach and Strategy Areas proposed for similar treatment are grouped for this discussion. The area numbers refer to those indicated on the attached plan. A. Rere2etate With Wet or Mesic Prairie Seed Mixture. (ieneral activities within these areas will include removal (via chemical and mechanical treatment) of existing weedy cormunities, seeding of appropriate native prairie seed mixture, and short and long -term management. Management activities may include spot chemical treatment, mowing, and burning. Areas between lots and the trail will be seeded with a short - growing native prairie seed mixture to provide a suitable transition. This treatment will be used for areas A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, All, B3, B6, C2, DI, E6 Acreage proposed for this treatment is 10 acres. Costs are estimated to be $1250. per acre. Total . cost for areas receiving this treatment is approximately $12,500. Revegetation activities will begin in April 2000. Seeding will be completed in June 2000. ivlanagement activities associated with the establishment of the community will be completed in 2003. The long -term viability of these areas is expected to be good, with low to moderate on- going maintenance requirements. B. Revegetate Storm Water Ponds with Wet or Mesic Prairie Seed Mixture General activities will include preparation of a suitable soil surface, seeding of an appropriate native prairie seed mixture, and short and long -term management. A wet mixture will be seeded near the NWL and a mesic mixture will be seeded throughout the remainder of the graded areas. This treatment is proposed for areas Al, A6, A9, B2, E3, and B5. Acreage proposed for this treatment is 3.5 acres. Costs are estimated to. be $1250. per acre. Total cost for areas receiving this treatment is approximately $4500. Revegetation activities will be . completed concurrent with project phases. Areas B2, A9, and E3 will be completed with phase 1, Area E5 will be completed with Phase II, and Areas Al and A6 will be completed with Phase III. Management activities associated with the establishment of the communities will be completed within approximately 3 years of the seeding date. The long -term viability of these areas is expected to be good; with low to moderate on- going maintenance requirements. C. Exialina Wooded Areas invasive Shrub Removal and Management. Wooded areas throughout the property have been subject to historic disturbance by livestock. As a result, invasive shrubs have become a dominant component of the understory, competing with more desirable native species and shading herbaceous ground cover. Management of these shrubs generally involves shrub removal and direct herbicide application to prevent regrowth. A second treatment may be required after 1 -2 years, with a light burn, as feasible. This treatment is appropriate for areas A10, B1, B4, Cl, C3. C4, and El. Approximately 7.5 acres are proposed for this treatment. Costs for this treatment are expected to range from $2,500. — $5,000 per acre. Total cost for areas receiving this treatment is $1 9,000 — $37,500. Shrub removal will begin during April and May, 2000, and be completed by October, 2001. The long -term viability of this approach is uncertain. Without ongoing control activities, these areas are likely to be re- invaded due to the abundance in seed sources on adjacent properties. D. Wetland Vegetation Restoration Wetland E3 (Wetland E) currently is dominated by a reed canary grass monoculture, which has low aesthetic and wildlife habitat values. Proposed activities would include removal of the existing plant community by chemical treatment and scraping, if appropriate, the upper 12 inches of soil. The area would then be reseeded with a suitable wet meadow'mixture. Estimated cost to complete the restoration of this 0.5 -acre wetland is $3000. Scraping and vegetation removal will be completed in spring, 2000. Revegetation will be completed in June, 2000. Management activities associated with the plant community establishment will be completed by October, 2003. Long -term viability of this restoration is good with low maintenance requirements. E. Wetland Reconstruction/Restoration Wetlands C. D, and F have been extensively disturbed by past excavation activities. Current conditions include marginal wetland hydrology and low diversity wetland plant • communities. Proposed activities would attempt to restore and supplement wetland hydrology, remove reed canary grass, consolidate wetlands, and remove trash, to provide functionally superior,. aesthetically attractive wetland areas. These activities would include excavation, spoil removal, grading, and reseeding with a wet meadow mixture. The estimated cost to complete the reconstruction and restoration of this 1.5 -acre area would be approximately $20,000. Grading is proposed to occur in April, 2000. Revegetation will be completed in June 2000. Management activities associated with the plant community establishment will be completed by October, 2003. The long -term viability of this restoration is good, with low maintenance requirements. Total cost of all proposed activities in items A through E would be expected to range from $59,000 to $77,500. F. Other Items 1. The feasibility of providing a buffer and filter strip to protect wetland area B5 should be examined. The wetland is outside of the green way areas. 2. An evaluation of hydrological restoration opportunities of wetlands partially within property boundaries should be completed. As adjacent parcels develop in the future. potential may exist for larger wetlands along the property boundaries to be restored. This applies to larger wetlands along the western and southern property boundaries. 3. An informational/educational pamphlet should be prepared to distribute to Iandowners adjacent to the green way areas. The pamphlet should include information on the ecological values of the area, management efforts, and rules regarding mowing, dumping, planting, etc. within the. area. • 4. When feasible without damaging trees and quality wetland plant communities, spoil pilesfromprevious excavations on the property should be removed and spread on upland areas. 5. Detailed grading and seeding plans will be prepared prior to project implementation. 6. Apprapriateinfiltration methods will be utilized, where, feasible, in the placement, design, and construction of the trail to minimize backyard runoff from directly entering adjacent wetlands. 7.. In. Year 2003, trees that have been killed or are determined to be dying due to increased water levels within Wetland Q. will be removed. "Hazard.Trees "adjacent to the trail will be removed at the time the trail is constructed. • no lie 4 - Ai Ll. „.,.. OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION PLAN OF CLEARWATER CREEK 3RD ADDITION A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ( \ r a I I --- t 1. GRAPHIC SCAL CALM ULTIMO — &Ming Flame O— Welland Area — Pnpaeed 13. Troll Corridor _ — Rewftlalod Area _ — Preserved and [nkanaed Area ram - Creenaar and Park Area ® - Slain eder DeMlbn Pond Area — YfNPONon Area — — "ass Line - — sln Fence Leed 0AV.gen k COW laelawe. Lea CUSP C IS 11 • AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, First Reading, Ordinance No. 99 -17, Easement Vacation, Oak Brook Peninsula (Continue to December 11, 2000) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required to Continue BACKGROUND: No new information has been received regarding settlement of this matter from either of the effected property owners. It is our understanding the two parties continue to mediate. Please note that staff recommends continuing this item to the December 11, 2000, City Council meeting. This is to eliminate the effort required to continue this item on a monthly basis. However, at such time as we are contacted by either party in this matter with new information, we will immediately communicate the information to the City Council and /or place the item on the City Council's agenda. RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the December 11, 2000, City Council meeting. AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 24, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -73, Receive Feasibility Report and CaII Hearing on Improvement — Main Street Trunk Utility Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: On June 12, 2000, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility report investigating the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and watremain to serve the Bluebill Ponds subdivision. Bluebill Ponds is located on the south side of Main Street, across from Wood Duck Trail. The feasibility report has been completed and attached. In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 429, the feasibility report is to be received by council and a public hearing scheduled. Based on the preliminary schedule, the hearing will be scheduled for August 14, 2000, at which time a detailed review of the feasibility report will be presented. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 00 -73 receiving the feasibility report and calling for a hearing on improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends to Council to adopt Resolution Number 00 -73. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -73 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT — MAIN STREET TRUNK UTILITIES. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted June 12, 2000, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Main Street, and abutting properties, from Nancy Drive to 2600 feet west, by constructing sanitary sewer and watermain, and this report was received by the council on July 24, 2000, and, WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $775,625. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such improvement on the 14th day of August, 2000, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of July, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 24, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk