Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/14/2000 Council Packet
AGENDA UPDATED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES 6:00 P.M. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Monday August 14, 2000 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call : Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) July 19, 2000, Council Work Session Minutes ii) July 24, 2000, Council Meeting Minutes iii) June 7, 2000 Council Work Session Minute) B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) August 14, 2000 (Check No. 59513 — 59656 in the amount of $310,831.16 ) ii) July Manual Disbursements - $10,774.05 iii) Centennial Fire District C) Consider Approving Amended Fee Schedule Resolution 00 -39A D) Consider Resolution 00 -76, Accepting Donation of Two Cellular Phones for Use by the Lino Lakes Police Department. E) Approve Election Judges List F) Consider Sandburr Days Event Application, 3.2 Beer Permit, Cabaret Licenses for Circle -Lex Lions on September 8, 9, & 10, 2000 & Resolution 00 -74. 2 Open Mike Page 1 • • • AGENDA A) Steve Garske — Introduction of Par — Aide Company (6800 Otter Lake Rd) B) America Legion (Andy Neal/Patti Coleman) — Recognize an outstanding Lino Lakes teen. 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Hiring Les Rydeen as Full -time City Mechanic (3/5 Vote Required) Dan Tesch B) 2001 Commission and Media Center Budgets (3/5 Vote Required) Dan Tesch 5. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) 1999 Audit Report, Ron Hedberg 6. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 11 -00, Open Burning, (3/5 Vote Required) Milo Bennett SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 12 -00, Adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, (3/5 Vote Required) Milo Bennett C) Consider Resolution 00 -75, Accepting Donation from Centennial Fire Relief Association 7. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner 8. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A) PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1St and 2nd Additions, John Powell B) PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utilities, John Powell (Continue to the August 28, 2000 City Council Meeting) C) FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 13 -00, Vacating Elmcrest Avenue from 400 feet south of Main Street to Cedar Street, John Powell D) Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Marmon/Keystone, Mary Alice Divine E) Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Twin City Fab, Inc., Mary Alice Divine Page 2 AGENDA F) Town Center Development Standards Endorsement (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser G) Final Plat, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition (revised) (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser 9. Unfinished Business 10. New Business 11. Community Calendar, August 15, through August 28, 2000: A) Wednesday, August 16, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Special Work Session B) Thursday, August 17, 2000, 8:30 a.m., City Council Budget Work Session at Centennial Fire Station #2, 7741 Lake Drive C) Wednesday, August 23, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session D) Monday, August 28, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 12. Adjourn Revised 8/11/00 RDG 10:33 a.m. Page 3 • AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY AUGUST 14, 2000 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of Monday, January 24, 2000 2.5. Consideration of TIF Policy 3. Public hearing: Proposed Business Subsidy to Marmon/Keystone • 3A. Consideration of Resolution No. 00 -03 Approving a Business Subsidy for Marmon/Keystone 4. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Marmon/Keystone 5. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Twin City Fab, Inc. 6. Adjourn • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES DAZE: Monday, January 24, 2000 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Bergeson, C. Dahl, D. Carlson, J. O'Donnell MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Wessel, Mary Divine, Ron Batty CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Only two current members of the EDA were present at the November 8, 1999 meeting. EDA Member Dahl moved to approve the minutes from the meeting. EDA Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS EDA member Dahl moved to appoint Donna Carlson as treasurer of the EDA. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. EDA Member Carlson moved to appoint the following: EDA President: John Bergeson EDA Vice President: Caroline Dahl EDA Secretary: Mary Divine EDA Assistant Treasurer: Ry -Chel Gaustad EDA Executive Director: Linda Waite Smith EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. EDA member O'Donnell moved to appoint the Quad Community Press as the EDA official newspaper. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. EDA Member Carlson moved to appoint the following as EDA legal depositories: Norwest Bank, First Bank NA, Firstar Bank, Merrill Lynch, Dain Bosworth, Juran & Moody, Prudential Bache, Lino Lakes State Bank, Lakeland National Bank, and League of Minnesota Cities 4M Fund. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO H &L MESABI • EDA President opened the hearing at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Wessel informed the board that H &L Mesabi was requesting tax increment financing (TIF) in the amount of $110,200 for the • purpose of constructing a facility in the Apollo Business Center. Ms. Divine stated that the Minnesota Business Subsidy Law requires a public hearing if a public entity provides a subsidy of more than $100,000. The granting of the subsidy should be evaluated by the EDA in terms of meeting the EDA criteria, which include encouraging economic and commercial diversity, and encouraging full utilization of existing infrastructure. The law also requires that a business commit to a wage and job goal. This company has agreed to a goal of one job within two years with a starting wage of $10 per hour, plus benefits. Ms. Carlson asked to explain the benefits. Mr. Tom Immen, representing the owner, stated it included medical insurance and vacation. Mr. Batty stated that the EDA adopted broad criteria so that jobs can be looked at in context with each proposal. The issue is whether the emphasis is on creating tax base or creating jobs. Ms. Carlson noted she had approved the site plan at the Planning & Zoning Board, but that job creation is a part of the statute and should not be overlooked. The wage proposed is not considered a living wage. This needs to be a topic of discussion for the city. Mr. Immen noted that the nine employees at the new facility have an average wage of $57,000 /year. However, if a job goal is set too high and the company does not meet it, the loss of subsidy after making a large capital investment would be devastating. EDA Member Carlson moved to close the public hearing. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. • RESOLUTION NO. 00 -01 APPROVING THE PROPOSED BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO H &L MESABI EDA member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 00 -01 contingent upon final project approvals by the city council. EDA Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN EDA AND H &L MESABI Mr. Wessel stated that the development contract provides $110,200 in TIF. The agreement removes $65,394 in assessments upfront, and reimbursed the developer the $5,000 escrow upon completion of the building. The remaining $39,806 will be provided on a pay -as- you -go basis toward land costs. The city will be reimbursed for assessments and administration costs before the developer is reimbursed. The project's local contribution of $13,220 is covered by the loss of interest the city has lost on deferred assessments. EDA Member O'Donnell moved to approve the contract contingent upon final project approvals by the city council. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 00-02 REQUESTING ANOKA COUNTY TO DECERTIFY TIF DISTRICT NO. 1 -4. • Mr. Wessel stated that this economic development district was established in 1990 to include the G.M. Development portion of the Apollo Business Park. Assistance was • • • provided to Emtech and Blue Heron Development within this district. The district has run its course and any unused increment will be used for eligible district expenses, after which any excess increment will be returned to Anoka County. EDA Member Carlson moved to approve Resolution No. 00 -02. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT EDA Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. EXPENDITURES AUGUST 14, 2000 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:55 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Options: FM Entry Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 1109 - 1109 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount O ANOKA COUNTY O ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 0 ARTIG, JEANNE 0 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, O BML BUILDERS, INC. O BOELTL, MELINDA O BUEHNER, DIANNE O CENTENNIAL LAKES POLIC 0 CHRISTENSEN, TAMMY O EMBERLEY, MARY KAY 0 EMERSON, JULIE O HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 0 KOLAK, BRIAN fa0 MEDICA O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT O NEHL, SHELLEY O NORLING, PAM O PEHRSON, JULIE O PETERSON, KATHRYN 0 PLATZER, NANCY O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O R. C. BURNS CONSTRUCTI 0 ROETTJER CONSTRUCTION, 0 SCOTT OLMSTEAD BUILDER O SPRING LAKE PARK POLIC O ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEP 0 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS O STAR TRIBUNE, INC. • FILING FEE * * * * * * ** REIMS SAFE & SOBER * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** GRILL RENTAL * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6581 L•* * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB SAFE & SOBER * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6401 N * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** MEDICAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** JULY SAC /SEPT SEWER * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC ADVERTISING REIMBURSE PLAN REVIEW REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1159 D REIMB BLDG ESCROW /101 PA REIMS SAFE & SOBER REIMB SAFE & SOBER ADVERTISING ADVERTISING Total for Dept ** O CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE GOLF LESSONS O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 201 * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** ADULT IN ADULT IN 29.50 2,374.42 55.00 43.82 475.00 20.00 66.00 1,453.86 55.00 58.00 47.00 500.00 47.00 4,881.20 22,869.00 55.00 55.00 15.00 55.00 15.00 17.10 162.83 500.00 1,950.00 2,429.89 2,102.83 155.52 200.00 40,687.97* 1,845.00 95.00 1,940.00* O BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. TROPHIES ADULT SP 439.31 Total for Dept 202 439.31* Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:56 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES OTHER Total for Dept 204 O CRYSTAL CAVE, INC. ADMISSION 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING O ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY 0 GROUP RESERVATIONS Total for Dept 205 • 114.27 114.27* SPECIAL 255.00 SPECIAL 20.60 SPECIAL 95.00 SPECIAL 374.00 744.60* 0 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 370.00 0 BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASSES YOUTH IN 162.00 O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 37.62 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 2.55 O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 49.00 0 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA OPTIONS PROGRAM YOUTH IN 4,444.31 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING YOUTH IN 95.00 O TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 29.40 Total for Dept 207 5,189.88* O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 208 O LINO LAKES AREA CHAMBE SPONSORSHIP O NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF MEMBERSHIP O PERSONNEL DECISIONS, I CONSULTATION 0 PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 24 Total for Dept 401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T & T WIRELESS BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS MAUMA MEDICA MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY MONTHLY SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES MEETING /D TESCH MEDICAL INSURANCE DUES /L W SMITH & D TESCH OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP PINKERTON SERVICE GROU DRUG TESTING SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAME PLATES UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 402 O ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOF 10 BOOTHS Total for Dept 403 YOUTH SP 190.00 190.00* MAYOR /CO 200.00 MAYOR /CO 230.00 MAYOR /CO 750.00 MAYOR /CO 3.46 MAYOR /CO 842.01 2,025.47* ADMINIST 29.25 ADMINIST 24.00 ADMINIST 28.94 ADMINIST 25.00 ADMINIST 993.97 ADMINIST 160.00 ADMINIST 213.95 ADMINIST 20.24 ADMINIST 109.44 ADMINIST 18.98 ADMINIST 111.26 1,735.03* ELECTION 1,967.19 1,967.19* O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 30, JULY 10 & 11 CHARTER 147.75 147.75* Total for Dept 405 O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE • SENIORS 28.56 SENIORS 4.10 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:56 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 406 O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS O COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SE O MEDICA O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI O MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS AS O PETTY CASH O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR OFFICE SUPPLIES SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE MEDICAL INSURANCE DELIVERY SERVICE MEMBERSHIP /A ROLEK DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 407 FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE 32.66* 81.64 4,554.20 400.01 18.85 125.00 5.40 78.43 5,263.53* 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR LEGAL CO 8,867.77 Total for Dept 414 8,867.77* O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ECONOMIC O DIVINE, MARY REIMBURSE CONFERENCE /FLO ECONOMIC O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY SERVICE ECONOMIC O PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP ECONOMIC O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI PRINTERS ECONOMIC O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE ECONOMIC O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP O SMYSER, JEFF MILEAGE /SEMINAR /MAPS 11/11 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 12 O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 416 O A T & T O ACTION RADIO & COMMUNI 0 ANOKA COUNTY O BROWN, MELINDA 0 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE O CONNEXUS ENERGY O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC O DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICA O EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPP O GALL'S INC. O GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN O I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, O IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH O INVENTORY TRADING COMP O KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 0 MEDICA 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 0 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRAT O NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSIT PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE MOBILE RADIO POLICE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS POLICE REIMBURSE UNIFORM ALLOWA POLICE CAR WASHES POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE COURSE /K RAUSCH POLICE EQUIP NEW SQUAD POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE PRINTING SERVICE POLICE WINDSHIRT POLICE PANELS POLICE MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE JUNE USAGE POLICE TRAINING /B HAMMES POLICE 27.39 121.78 593.96 49.31 36.97 200.00 83.31 148.50 1,261.22* 193.95 28.77 70.90 147.75 52.07 493.44* 3.50 1,246.75 900.00 80.79 76.68 10.65 95.51 200.00 1,526.71 223.93 57.53 46.32 1,123.30 29.00 3,772.86 6,468.37 82.88 405.08 995.00 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:57 Operator: JAL Page: 4 • CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description • Dept Amount 0 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /MILEAGE /MEALS O SHRED -IT, INC. DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE O US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE O VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 O CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI QUARTERLY BUDGET O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE BUILDING 0 PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP BUILDING 0 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE BUILDING Total for Dept 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. SOD MONTHLY SERVICE OVERLAY /STREET PATCHING MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON BENEFITS NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE SEALMASTER /ST. PAUL CRACK SEALER T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE WARNING LITES OF MN, I SEWER BREAK #2 /WARE WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ZACK'S INC. MUN. INDUS CLEANER /PUMP Total for Dept 430 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU O BAUER BUILT, INC. 0 BLAINE BROTHERS, INC. O BOYER TRUCKS, INC. O CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 0 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I 0 GOA COMPANY, INC. 0 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA O LEEF BROTHER, INC. 0 LINO AUTO MACHINING O LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I O NEW HOLLAND PLAN PARTS /SUPPLIES TIRE REPAIR TOWING PARTS #222 STROBE LIGHTS GASOHOL PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS /SUPPLIES CHEMICALS /CLEANER OIL FILTER SHOP TOWELS TURN ROTOR CLUTCH PARTS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS ROAD STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET 249.17 54.95 585.72 116.95 408.39 18,760.04* 90,026.22 650.02 32.14 90,708.38* 593.96 15.00 1,376.00 68.81 2,053.77* 48.24 58.63 16,784.00 431.14 102.25 787.91 8.84 118.97 2,723.16 165.77 3,775.62 79.79 169.31 142.30 626.70 26,022.63* 72.98 44.91 186.38 32.47 179.99 2,146.21 226.85 2.75 97.33 220.83 16.19 14.70 25.00 225.52 417.12 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:57 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL TOOLS 0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE 0 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA CHIPPER PARTS Total for Dept 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • A T & T ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, AUDIO VISUAL TECHNICAL CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS CONNEXUS ENERGY CORPORATE EXPRESS, DALCO, INC. DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI JANITORIAL SERVICE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE PAPER VIDEO EQUIPMENT /INSTALLA FIBEROPTIC MAINTENANCE MONTHLY SERVICE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MEDICA NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI NORTHERN STATES POWER, PETTY CASH PITNEY WORKS SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI STATE SUPPLY COMPANY, UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR US WEST US WEST COMMUNICATIONS A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ANOKA COUNTY CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS CORPORATE EXPRESS, MEDICAL INSURANCE ADJUST HUMIDITY /TEMP AT MONTHLY SERVICE DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PRINTERS BREAKER LONG TERM INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 432 INC KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, SOD MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE CITY MAP IRRIGATION REPAIR OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COUPLER MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE SUPPLIES SIGNS WIRE SCOREBOARD /SUNRISE PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. SHARPEN CHIPPER KNIVES UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 450 0 BERNSTEIN, BARRY MILEAGE 0 BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /SUPPLIES FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATI RECREATI 43.89 69.48 16.63 584.83 4,624.06* 43.37 136.14 564.45 4,750.00 7,434.08 1,240.35 2.45 314.34 678.86 74.51 71.88 400.01 384.68 1,569.94 10.00 5,490.50 795.56 25.06 9.96 1,970.93 64.17 26,031.24* 20.13 145.93 136.14 19.18 1,131.66 3.95 15.28 34.59 1,600.04 8.84 111.35 193.83 1,200.00 26.75 147.46 54.99 57.83 4,907.95* 74.75 95.94 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:58 Operator: JAL • Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dept Amount CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS ADVERTISING RECREATI CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI DAHL, DEANNA REIMBURSE CRAFT SUPPLIES RECREATI DAY - TIMERS, INC. SUPPLIES FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. PIZZA KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES LET'S PLAY, INC. SUBSCRIPTION MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE ORIENTIAL TRADING COMP SUPPLIES SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI PRINTERS TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN SUPPLIES UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 451 0 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAME PLATES 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 11 Total for Dept 452 RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI PARK BOA PARK BOA 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM O PETTY CASH DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP ENVIRONM O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAME PLATES ENVIRONM O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE ENVIRONM Total for Dept 461 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 462 SOLID WA SOLID WA O CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL /STUMPS GRIN FORESTRY O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FORESTRY 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE FORESTRY Total for Dept 463 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE WATER AMERICAN WATER WORKS MEMBERSHIP /TIM H WATER BLAINE, CITY OF QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN WATER C. W. HOULE, INC. RAISE YARD CASTING /REPLA WATER COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SE CONNEXUS ENERGY GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN MARUDAS, INC. MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. PETTY CASH U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE CONTAINER DEMURRAGE TWO WAY MAILERS MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER DECALS /POSTAGE /MEALS /SUP WATER GAUGE WIRE WATER 182.58 5.52 6.48 46.52 4.35 66.00 13.21 20.00 193.95 8.84 116.95 285.64 106.39 90.14 1,317.26* 18.98 87.75 106.73* 27.39 200.00 4.42 12.00 37.96 9.27 291.04* 159.00 2.08 161.08* 585.75 200.01 9.36 795.12* 207.51 105.00 611.00 742.00 808.50 1,060.93 188.00 5,948.43 2,304.99 96.98 4.42 33.40 15,375.00 Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:34:58 • Operator: JAL Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name • • Description Dept Amount 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM INSURANCE 0 US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 0 BLAINE, CITY OF 0 C. W. HOULE, INC. 0 COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SE O CONNEXUS ENERGY 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 0 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, O INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES O MARUDAS, INC. 0 MEDICA O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN RAISE YARD CASTING /REPLA SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE 3 HOURS TELEVISE SERVICE TWO WAY MAILERS MEDICAL INSURANCE JULY SAC /SEPT SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE LONG TERM INSURANCE Total for Dept 495 WATER 58.40 WATER 58.90 WATER 37.03 27,640.49* SEWER 1,385.70 SEWER 564.00 SEWER 808.50 SEWER 252.63 SEWER 37.36 SEWER 188.00 SEWER 495.00 SEWER 2,305.00 SEWER 96.97 SEWER 29,372.00 SEWER 4.42 SEWER 46.20 35,555.78* O HERMAN APPRAISAL SERVI CONSULTANT /APOLLO DRIVE OTHER O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR OTHER Total for Dept 499 310.00 445.50 755.50* Grand Total 310,831.16* Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:13:13 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ses: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (A) Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 08142000 - 08142000 Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 2 68.37 68.37 .00 .00 000045 ROETTJER CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000051 A T & T 1 3.50 3.50 .00 .00 000052 A T & T 1 43.37 43.37 .00 .00 000063 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 1 25.06 25.06 .00 .00 000088 ACTION RADIO & COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 1,246.75 1,246.75 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 272.28 272.28 .00 .00 000106 US WEST 1 2,084.82 2,084.82 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 524.66 524.66 .00 .00 000114 INVENTORY TRADING COMPANY 1 29.00 29.00 .00 .00 0 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 1 43.89 43.89 .00 .00 I00 55 BOELTL, MELINDA 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 24.00 24.00 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 3 370.00 370.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 72.98 72.98 .00 .00 000223 SPRING LAKE PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 2,429.89 2,429.89 .00 .00 000224 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 2,102.83 2,102.83 .00 .00 000248 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 1 405.08 405.08 .00 .00 000264 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1 68.16 68.16 .00 .00 000300 AMERICAN WATER WORKS 1 105.00 105.00 .00 .00 000320 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC. 1 564.45 564.45 .00 .00 000350 ANOKA COUNTY 2 19.18 19.18 .00 .00 • • Date: 08/08/2000 • # Time: 12:13:15 Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000361 CRYSTAL CAVE, INC. 1 255.00 255.00 .00 .00 000362 EMBERLEY, MARY KAY 1 58.00 58.00 .00 .00 000363 HERMAN APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC. 1 310.00 310.00 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 384.68 384.68 .00 .00 000365 NORLING, PAM 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000366 ORIENTIAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. 1 116.95 116.95 .00 .00 000367 BUEHNER, DIANNE 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 000368 BML BUILDERS, INC. 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 000369 BLAINE BROTHERS, INC. 1 186.38 186.38 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY 1 900.00 900.00 .00 .00 000371 CHRISTENSEN, TAMMY 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000372 EMERSON, JULIE 1 47.00 47.00 .00 .00 000373 KOLAK, BRIAN 1 47.00 47.00 .00 .00 000374 NEHL, SHELLEY 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000375 PEHRSON, JULIE 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 lo00 0 6 PLATZER, NANCY 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 7 R. C. BURNS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 162.83 162.83 .00 .00 000378 DAHL, DEANNA 1 6.48 6.48 .00 .00 000379 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY 1 995.00 995.00 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 2,374.42 2,374.42 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 29.50 29.50 .00 .00 000478 ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. 1 16,784.00 16,784.00 .00 .00 000511 AUDIO VISUAL TECHNICAL SERVICES 1 4,750.00 4,750.00 .00 .00 000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 1 44.91 44.91 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 74.75 74.75 .00 .00 000675 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 1 43.82 43.82 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 1,996.70 1,996.70 .00 .00 • Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:13:17 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal v41, # Name Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 32.47 32.47 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 439.31 439.31 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 133.56 133.56 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 9,461.77 9,461.77 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 110.58 110.58 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 1,306.00 1,306.00 .00 .00 000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 2 417.12 417.12 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 90,026.22 90,026.22 .00 .00 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 3 8,748.32 8,748.32 .00 .00 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,453.86 1,453.86 .00 .00 001116 CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE 1 585.75 585.75 .00 .00 001117 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE 1 1,845.00 1,845.00 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 76.68 76.68 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2 2,995.70 2,995.70 .00 .00 001193 COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 1 6,171.20 6,171.20 .00 .00 I0 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 1 179.99 179.99 .00 .00 00 0 DALCO, INC. 2 314.34 314.34 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 2,146.21 2,146.21 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 678.86 678.86 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 2 5,948.43 5,948.43 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 226.85 226.85 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 244.37 244.37 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 223.93 223.93 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 97.33 97.33 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 2 129.41 129.41 .00 .00 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 220.83 220.83 .00 .00 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 376.00 376.00 .00 .00 • Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:13:20 • # Name CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 16.19 16.19 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 495.00 495.00 .00 .00 001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 46.32 46.32 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 191.76 191.76 .00 .00 002180 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 1 3,772.86 3,772.86 .00 .00 002230 DIVINE, MARY 1 121.78 121.78 .00 .00 002326 LET'S PLAY, INC. 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 14.70 14.70 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 2 1,123.30 1,123.30 .00 .00 002360 LINO AUTO MACHINING 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 002379 LINO LAKES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 260.11 260.11 .00 .00 002485 MARUDAS, INC. 1 4,609.99 4,609.99 .00 .00 002506 MAUMA 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 18,351.31 18,351.31 .00 .00 0 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 52,241.00 52,241.00 .00 .00 00 94 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 2 122.66 122.66 .00 .00 002720 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY MGMT ASSOC 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 002770 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY 1 118.97 118.97 .00 .00 002839 MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 111.35 111.35 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 193.83 193.83 .00 .00 003193 NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 .00 .00 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1 4,293.10 4,293.10 .00 .00 003293 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPPLY, LLC 1 1,526.71 1,526.71 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 213.95 213.95 .00 .00 003483 PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC. 1 750.00 750.00 .00 .00 • Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:13:25 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount V • # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003490 PETTY CASH 1 165.24 165.24 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 249.17 249.17 .00 .00 003508 PINKERTON SERVICE GROUP, INC. 1 109.44 109.44 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY WORKS 4 5,490.50 5,490.50 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 651.10 651.10 .00 .00 003620 PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. 1 26.75 26.75 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003933 SEALMASTER /ST. PAUL 1 165.77 165.77 .00 .00 004010 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 1 75.92 75.92 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 1,281.20 1,281.20 .00 .00 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 70.90 70.90 .00 .00 004130 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 1 155.52 155.52 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,376.00 1,376.00 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 3,775.62 3,775.62 .00 .00 0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 69.48 69.48 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 5 1,225.26 1,225.26 .00 .00 004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 2 135.79 135.79 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 3 15,375.00 15,375.00 .00 .00 004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,485.13 1,485.13 .00 .00 004667 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA 2 584.83 584.83 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 2 275.98 275.98 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 408.39 408.39 .00 .00 004803 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 142.30 142.30 .00 .00 004880 ZACK'S INC. MUN. INDUS. SUP 1 626.70 626.70 .00 .00 005006 ARTIG, JEANNE 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 005015 NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 230.00 230.00 .00 .00 • Date: 08/08/2000 Time: 12:13:30 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Name Operator: JAL Page: 6 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 005029 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA 1 4,444.31 4,444.31 .00 .00 005030 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC. 1 1,967.19 1,967.19 .00 .00 005037 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF 1 374.00 374.00 .00 .00 005039 WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. 2 169.31 169.31 .00 .00 900060 DAY - TIMERS, INC. 1 46.52 46.52 .00 .00 900240 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 900254 PETERSON, KATHRYN 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 900305 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900438 SCOTT OLMSTEAD BUILDERS, INC. 4 1,950.00 1,950.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 162.00 162.00 .00 .00 900539 BROWN, MELINDA 1 80.79 80.79 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 107.43 107.43 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 176 310,831.16 310,831.16 .00 .00* • • FLEET MANUAL DISBURSEMENT July -2000 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY /LICENSE TABS $ 23.50 MAYOR/COUNCIL FIRSTAR/ROOM RESERVATIONS $ 750.55 STREETS ARCADE ASPHALT $ 10,000.00 TOTAL JULY MANUAL DISBURSEMENTS $ 10,774.05 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax August 3, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council • City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12293 — 12315, in the amount of $6028.93 is hereby requested. • • DATE CHECK# NAME 08/03/2000 12293 08/03/2000 12294 08/03/2000 12295 08/03/2000 12296 08/03/2000 12297 08/03/2000 12298 08/03/2000 12299 08/03/2000 12300 08/03/2000 12301 08/03/2000 12302 08/03/2000 12303 08/03/2000 12304 08/03/2000 12305 08/03/2000 12306 08/03/2000 12307 08/03/2000 12308 08/03/2000 12309 08/03/2000 12310 08/03/2000 12311 08/03/2000 12312 • 08/03/2000 12313 08/03/2000 12314 08/03/2000 12315 • Centennial Fire District Check Register American Fastener Arthur Mohler Circle Pines Utilites Eddy Brothers Company Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Emergency Medical Products, Inc. Frattallone's Hardware Intermark International Assn. of Arson Investigations Metro Fire Miles Kimball Moore Medical N.D.C.I.A.A.I Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Paper Direct Quality Rooter Randy Rolstad Reliant Energy Minnegasco Rivard Electric Rick Bangert Verizon Wireless W. S. Darley & Company Viking Office Products Page 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42110 - Other Maintenance 15.49 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 77.88 42251 - Station 1 -Gas Expense 55.20 42130 - Equipment Expense 495.00 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 2,292.69 42260 - Medical Supplies 265.11 42110 - Other Maintenance 96.45 42130 - Equipment Expense 145.50 42200 - Dues and Memberships 100.00 42130 - Equipment Expense 69.31 42180 - Office Supplies 51.74 42260 - Medical Supplies 114.45 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 190.00 42270 - Breathing Air 73.43 45010 - Safety Camp Supplies 140.88 42110 - Other Maintenance 99.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 120.83 42253 - Station 2 - Gas Expense 55.52 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,139.72 42100 - Fuel and Lube 13.69 42240 - Telephone 131.28 42130 - Equipment Expense 115.97 45010 - Safety Camp Supplies 169.79 Total 6,028.93 AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Milo Bennett, Fire Chief MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: Fee for Open Burning Permit VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority Background: A new Open Burning ordinance is proposed which includes provisions for a fee for a burning permit. The fee schedule, for the city, will need to be updated to include a $5 fee for a burning permit. Options: 1. Modify Fee schedule to include a $5 fee for a burning peiniit. 2. Do not modify fee schedule. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Centennial Fire District, to approve resolution 39A, which is the fee schedule with the $5 burning permit fee added to the schedule. • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -39A FEE SCHEDULE ALCOHOL BEVERAGES 3.2 BEER INVESTIGATION 3.2 BEER OFF -SALE 3.2 BEER ON -SALE 3.2 BEER ON -SALE TEMPORARY CLUB LICENSE LIQUOR LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE LIQUOR ON -SALE •IQUOR OFF -SALE LIQUOR OFF -SALE TEMPORARY WINE LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE WINE SUNDAY LIQUOR $150.00 INDIV. $350.00 CORPORATE $100.00 /YEAR $300.00 /YEAR $35.00/+ $5.00DAY $300.00 $150.00 INDIV. $350.00 CORPORATE $4,500.00 /YEAR $100.00 $50.00 $150.00 INDIV. $350.00 CORPORATE $500.00/YEAR $200.00/YEAR AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION CABARET LICENSE DANCES GAMBLING PERMIT APPLICATION STATE LICENSED GAMBLING: BUILDING - CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES BUILDING PERMIT ENCROACHMENT FEES EXCAVATION /GRADING PERMIT FENCE PERMITS � IGN PERMIT - PERMANENT IGN PERMIT - TEMPORARY MECHANICAL - PERMIT $35.00 $200.00/YEAR $10.00 REGULATION TAX 1 /10 OF 1% OF NET PROFITS PERMIT FEE 3A TABLE — EXHIBIT A* $30.00 $50.00* $30.50 PERMIT FEE 3A TABLE — EXHIBIT A* $25.00/TERM • NEW $60.50 GAS PIPING $25.50 WOOD BURNING /GAS $25.50 FIREPLACE /ALTERATIONS /ADDITIONS AIR CONDITIONING 1 % OF CONTRACT AMOUNT MOBILE HOME PERMITS PLAN CHECK PLUMBING SEWER PERMIT FEE SEWER RATE QUARTERLY CONTRACTORS LICENSE SAC (SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE) STATE VERIFICATION OF LICENSE WATER PERMIT /CONNECTION FEE WATER -RATE QUARTERLY BUSINESS & MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENT FEE **BURNING PERMIT * *CITY HOME RULE CHARTER. •OG KENNEL DOG LICENSE MALE /FEMALE DOG LICENSE MALE /FEMALE NEUTERE ANIMALS IMPOUNDMENT FEE COPIES: CITY CODE BOOK COPIES: MAILED MINUTES COPIES: AGENDA COPIES: PER SHEET COPIES: AERIAIJTOPO MAP CITY MAP (sm. An. Co. Surv. Map) 20/20 BOOK COMP. PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK FAX CHARGE GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEWS RECYCLING CONTAINER PURCHASE RESIDENTS GUIDE TAPES: AUDIO TAPES: VIDEO TOBACCO LICENSE TOWER APPLICATION FEES III/TRANSIENT MERCHANT TREE PRESERVATION TAPE $30.50 65% OF PERMIT FEE $9.00/FIXTURE $100.00 $49.00 /QUARTER $45.00 /CALENDAR YEAR $1,100.00 $5.00 /CALL $125.00 $20.00 /QUARTER + 1.63 PER 1000 GALLONS $20.00 /SEARCH $5.00 1ST COPY FREE /$10.00 EACH ADDITIONAL COPY $20.00/YEAR $10.00/BI- ANNUAL WITH PROOF OF RABIES VAC. D /SPAYED $5.00/BI- ANNUAL WITH PROOF OF RABIES $25.00 */Not Associated with Otter Lake Animal Control $75.00 $36.00/YEAR $12.00/YEAR $.25/PAGE $10.00 $2.00 $3.50 TBD (COST OF REPRODUCTION) $30.00 $1.00/PAGE (NO LONG DISTANCE) $75.00 /FIRST TRUCK $45.00 EACH ADDITIONAL $68.00 $10.00 /1sT FREE $1.00 $25.00 $50.00 $50.00/YEAR $10,000* $250.00/YEAR $15.95/ROLL 2 •REE PRESERVATION PLAN REVIEW TREE LOCATION INSPECTION VISITS SITE VISITS PEDDLER/SOLICITOR RETURN CHECK CHARGE ZONING MAPS ZONING ORDINANCE 3/4" WATER METER 1" WATER METER TOUCH PAD MIU (METER INTERACE UNIT) — PHONE CULVERT PRICES $68.00 $68.00 $68.00 $250.00/YEAR $25.00 $5.00/LARGE or COLORED $25.00 $290.00 $325.00 $20.00 $125.00 ALL CULVERT PRICES ARE BASED ON MARKET PRICES AND INCLUDE TAX & DELIVERY & AND 15% ADMIN FEE PARK & RECREATION USER FEES FIELD RENTAL — RESIDENT ONLY • BASEBALL/SOFTBALL DRAG ONLY BASEBALL/SOFTBALL DRAG & CHALK SOCCER (EXCLUDING YOUTH) PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION PARTY WAGON - BLOCK PARTY — WKDAY, NON -BLOCK PARTY - WKEND, NON -BLOCK PARTY PLAYGROUND GRAB BAGS PLANNING & ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS INTERIM USE PERMITS SITE PLAN REVIEW VACATION (street, utility, drainage) VARIANCE REZONING SUBDIVISION: PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY FINAL PLAT • $20/EVENING $30/EVENING $65/EVENING RESIDENTS NO PEE NON - RESIDENT $25 NO FEE $25 $40 $10.00 / $25.00 3 $500.00* $350.00* $350.00* $500.00* $250.00* $250.00* $350.00* $1,250.00* $1,250.00* $1,250.00* $* • MINOR SUBDIVISION/LOT SPLIT PARK DEDICATION COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION RESIDENTIAL TRAMWAY DEDICATION POLICE FEES DANGEROUS DOGS ALL REPORTS: ACCIDENT, BURGLARY, FIRE VEHICLE LOCKOUTS PERMIT TO CARRY CLEARANCE LETTER FINGERPRINTING VIDEO IMAGE PRINTING PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTGRAPHS (COMPUTERIZED) BOOKING PHOTOS FALSE ALARMS TOWING IMPOUNDMENT (BLUE TOW) $250.00* FORMULA BASED ON ORDINANCE BASED ON ORDINANCE BASED ON PARK COMP PLAN $35.00 $5.00 UP TO 5 PAGES, $.25 PER PAGE NO CHARGE $10.00 $5.00 BY APPT. NO PEE $5.00 $25.00 PLUS DEVELOPING COST $1.50 PER SHEET $5.00 3 FREE - 4 -10 $50.00 - 11+ $100.00 /CALENDAR YR CONTRACT COST COSTS INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE TAXES CITY INCURRED COSTS IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ADDED These fees shall become effective on approval by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES ON THIS 22 DAY OF MAY 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being take thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. iireated 5/15/2000 by RDG pdated 5/19/2000 at 10:00 a.m. * *Updated 8/14/2000 by council action 4 • • • AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE August 14, 2000 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND Consideration of Resolution No 2000 - 76 Accepting Donation of two cellular phones from resident Bart Volkmann Simple Majority Lino Lakes resident, Bart Volkmann has graciously donated two cellular telephones for use within the Department of Public Safety. Squad cars are equipped with cellular phones, however, police personnel utilize cellular phones in a non - patrol functions. The purpose of Resolution 2000 -76is to accept and publicly thank Bart Volkmann for his generous donation. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -76 accepting the donation. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO.2000 -76 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM RESIDENT BART VOLKMANN OF TWO CELLULAR TELEPHONES WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Police Department equips patrol squad cars with a cellular phone; and police department personnel utilize cellular phones in non - patrol functions; and funding for additional cellular phones was not part of the 2000 Department of Public Safety budget; and resident, Bart Volkmann annually updates his personal cellular phone, and asked whether the police department would have a use for these cellular phones; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the cellular phones and wishes to express its gratitude to Bart Volkmann for his donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of August, 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad /IGMC, City Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE OF MEETING: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM NO. 1E Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk August 14, 2000 Election Judge Approval Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required) Attached please find a list of Election Judges that are scheduled to complete training. Election judge training is scheduled for August 17, 2000 at the Lino Lakes City Hall. As a result of advertising, approximately 12 additional judges have been added to the election judge roster. Staff request Council to consider approving the list of Election Judges for the September 12, 2000 Primary Election and the November 7, 2000 General Election. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the list of Election Judges 2. Deny the list of Election Judges RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. • • • • NAME Mary Altstatt Jo Anne Bucholz *Eileen Couture Alvin DeMotts Al DeLaPointe Judy Domning *Sylvia Marier Patty Meier Jackie Murawski *Lisa MacNeal Beverly Ornell Rob Rafferty Mary Schleicher Jane Schmid Rosemary Storberg William P. Trudeau Jean Viger Marie Waldhauser Katherine Wall Gail Wells *Ardith Bernier James Bernier Karen A. Carlin Cynthia A. Casanova Cori M. Duffy Gloria Goodin Jim Goodin Marion Gustafson Vivian Hanson *Ruth Howard Joyce Lund *June Miller Ann Nelson Sally Nelson Cheryl Noren Bernice Salo Anna May Thies Mary Trombley 2000 ELECTION JUDGES ADDRESS 6134 Ware Road 8215 Wood Duck Trail 6973 Lakeview Avenue 7140 Rice Lake Lane 6544 Deerwood Lane 7569 Leonard Avenue 1801 - 77th Street 7073 Rice Lake Lane 6843 West Shadow Lake Dr. 1141 Birch Street 1047 Mallard Lane 1573 Merganser Court, 55038 610 Main Street 6026 W. Bald Eagle Drive 6978 Lake Drive 410 — 62nd Street 1715 NE 133rd Lane, Ham Lake 221 Baldwin Circle 6020 W. Bald Eagle Drive, 55110 6701 East Shadow Lake Drive 2325 Main Street, 55038 2325 Main Street 6650 Black Duck Drive 6514 Joyer Lane 6256 Hollow Lane 1477 Snow Goose Trail, 55038 1477 Snow Goose Trail, 55038 1509 Ash Street, 55038 6152 Hodgson Road 6333 Hodgson Road 480 Arrowhead Drive 1220 - 81st Street,55025 87 Lilac Street 87 Lilac Street 7155 Ivy Ridge Court 7482 Peltier Drive 7590 - 20th Avenue, 55038 880 James Street PAGE 1 • • • Mary Fogerty Deloris Ramsden Ken Jarvis Mae Etta Jarvis Arnie Entzel Jan Entzel Jessica Lemke Pat Rickaby Robert Norton Lester Fiskewold Rosalie Ostendorf Valerie Rosengren Betty Ramsden Betty Livingston Diane Bergeson John Sullivan Kim Sullivan Shirlyn Nickelson Shirley Patterson 2000 ELECTION JUDGES 7088 Brian Drive, Centerville, 55038 518 Lilac Street, 7167 Ivy Ridge Court 7167 Ivy Ridge Court 6632 Pelican Place 6632 Pelican Place 503 Andall Street 59 North Road 59 North Road 307 Baldwin Court 307 Baldwin Court 18030 Kettle River Blvd. 502 Lilac Street 7156 Sunset Road 6996 West Shadow Lake Dr. 7132 Whippoorwill Lane 7132 Whippoorwill Lane 481 Linden Lane 7101 104 Ridge Lane PAGE 2 STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM NO. 1F Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk - Treasurer August 14, 2000 Consideration of Special Events Permit, 3.2 Beer Permit, Cabaret License for Sandburr Days & Resolution 00 -74 Simple Majority Sandburr Days is an annual event held by the Circle -Lex Lions Club at Sunrise Park. This year Sandburr Days will be held on September 8 - 10. This annual event requires a special events permit, 3.2 beer license, and a cabaret license. The Special Event Permit has been submitted and approved by the affected departments. The application for a 3.2 beer license is complete and is accompanied by a certificate of insurance for liquor liability that is scheduled for renewal on September 1, 2000. The cabaret license application is also complete. This license is required to regulate entertainment where on -sale beer is served. All necessary fees have also been paid. The Circle -Lex Lions Club are required to have a food license from Anoka County. They are in the process of obtaining this license and it is necessary that it be posted in the area where food is sold. OPTIONS: 1. Approve 2. Deny 3. Return to Staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION: The City Clerks office recommends option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 3.2 INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE $35.00 No. 00 -003 LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: CIRCLE -LEX LIONS CLUB INTERNATIONAL PO BOX 13 CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 3.2 INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES FOR THE PERIOD COMMENCING SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 AT 2:00 P.M. TERMINATING AT 10:00 P.M. SEPTEMBER 10, 2000. THIS LICENSE IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEE THEREFORE AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE AND OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PERTAINING TO SUCH SALE, AND IS REVOCABLE FOR THE LOCATION THEREOF; NOT TRANSFERABLE. WITNESS THE GOVERNING BODY of the City of Lino Lakes and the Seal thereof this 14TH day of August 2000. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY: John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chef Gaustad, CMC City Clerk- Treasurer SEAL • • No. 00 - 03 $20.00 CITY OF LINO LAKES CABARET LICENSE WHEREAS, The Circle Pines/Lexington Lions Club has paid the sum of $20.00 to the Treasurer of said City as required by the Ordinances of said City and complied with all the requirements of said Ordinances necessary for obtaining this license, NOW, THEREFORE, by order of the City Council and by virtue hereof, the said The Circle Pines/Lexington Lions is hereby licensed and authorized to conduct the annual Sandburr Days Celebration, Sunrise Park, Lino Lakes, Minnesota for the period of two (3) days starting September 8, 1999 and ending September 10, 1999 subject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances. Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the City of Lino Lakes this day of , 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC Clerk- Treasurer (SEAL) • Council Member its adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00-74 CABARET LICENSE WHEREAS, Circle -Lex Lions Club International has paid the sum of twenty dollars to the Treasurer of said City as required by the Ordinances of said City and complied with all the requirements of said Ordinances necessary for obtaining this License. NOW, THEREFORE, by order of the City Council, and by virtue hereof, the said Circle -Lex Lions Club International is hereby licensed and authorized to conduct the annual "Sandburr Day Event at Sunset Park Lino Lakes, Minnesota for the period starting September 8, 2000 and ending September 10, 2000 subject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC Clerk- Treasurer John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • Page 2 of 2 Res. 00 -74 CERTIFICATION Given under my hand and the Corporate Seal of the City of Lino Lakes this day of 2000. ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk- Treasurer (SEAL) • AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Public Hearing on the proposed business subsidy to Marmon /Keystone Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Marmon /Keystone has requested tax increment financing (TIF) assistance in the amount of $322,242 for the purpose of constructing an 80,000 square foot distribution facility in the Apollo Business Center. The company has been in business for 90 years as an entity, with a Minnesota location for the past four years as a distributor of tubing and piping, mainly for the agricultural industry. The local distributor currently employs 11, including warehouse, drivers, office and sales. The company has committed to hiring at least four new employees at no less than $15 per hour, plus benefits, which include medical, sick leave and ID vacation. This is well above the minimum established in the EDA's business subsidy requirement. The proposed facility will have a minimum market value of $3,152,600 for a total of $145,509 in annual taxes (based on 2000 dollars). According to the Minnesota Business Subsidy law, the EDA must hold a public hearing before granting a subsidy that exceeds $100,000. In addition to increasing the tax base, the granting of a subsidy can be evaluated in terms of whether it promotes one or more of the following: 1. Encourage economic and commercial diversity within the community; 2. Contribute to the establishment of a critical mass of commercial development within an area; 3. Provide basic goods and services, increase the range of goods and services available or encourage fast - growing businesses; 4. Promote redevelopment objectives and removal of blight, including pollution cleanup; 5. Promote the retention or adaptive use of buildings of historical or architectural significance; 6. Promote additional or spin -off development within the community; • • 7. Encourage full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Open the public hearing 2. Continue the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • • ARTICLE X Business Subsidy Act Requirements Section 10.1. Compliance with Business Subsidy Provisions. The parties agree and represent to each other as follows: (a) The subsidy provided to the Developer pursuant to this Agreement consists of the Property Write Down in the amount of $174,403, assumption of the Special Assessments in the amount of $139,839 and reimbursement of up to $3,000 for the additional cost of maintaining native vegetation, if the Developer installs native vegetation. The Development Property is located within the Authority's TIF District No 1 -9, an economic development district. (b) The public purposes of the subsidy are to promote development of a site within the City's industrial park, make fuller use of existing public infrastructure which is currently under- utilized, generate spin -off development within the community, increase jobs in the City and the State, and increase the tax base of the City and the State. (c) The goals for the subsidy are to secure construction of the Minimum Improvements on the Property; to maintain the Minimum Improvements as a warehouse /distribution facility for at least five years as described in clause (f) below; and to create the jobs and wage levels in accordance with Section 10.2 of this Agreement. (d) If the goals described in clause (c) above are not met, the Developer must make the payments to the Authority described in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. (e) The subsidy is needed because the cost of acquiring the Property at fair market value plus the cost of the Special Assessments make development of the site financially infeasible without public assistance. (f) The Developer must continue operation of the Minimum Improvements as an industrial facility for at least five years after the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion. (g) The Developer's parent corporation is The Marmon Corporation, a Delaware corporation, located at 225 West Washington, Chicago, Illinois 60606 -3418. (h) The Developer has not received, and does'not expect to receive financial assistance from any other grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act in connection with purchase of the Property or construction of the Minimum Improvements. (i) For purposes of this Article X, the Developer includes any party to whom the Developer leases the Property or Minimum Improvements. Section 10.2. Job and Wage Goals. Within two years after the earlier of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Developer occupies the Property (the "Compliance Date "), the Developer shall cause to be created at least four new full -time equivalent jobs on the Property, and shall cause the wages for the four new employees to be no less than RHB- 183249v3 LN 140 -72 16 • • • $15.00 per hour, exclusive of benefits. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the wage and job goals described in this Section 10.2 are met by the Compliance Date, those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations under Sections 10.1(f) and 10.4. The Authority may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, provided that nothing in this Section 10.2 will be construed to limit the Authority's legislative discretion regarding this matter. Section 10.3. Remedies. If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section 10.1(c), the Developer shall repay the Authority a pro rata share of the amount of the subsidy granted by this Agreement, plus interest on said amount at the implicit price deflator as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50, subd. 2, accrued from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion to the date of payment. The repayment shall be made by the Developer within one year of written demand by the Authority. The term pro rata share means percentages calculated as follows: (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the warehouse /distribution facility in accordance with Section 10.1(f), 60 less the number of months of operation as a warehouse /distribution facility (where any month in which the facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the date of the Certificate of Completion ending with the date the facility ceases operation as determined by the Authority, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100 %. Nothing in this Section 10.3 shall be construed to limit the Authority's remedies under Article IX hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section 10.3 and any other remedy available to the Authority for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 10.1(c), the Developer agrees and understands that its may not a receive a business subsidy from the Authority or any grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act for a period of five years from the date of the failure or until the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section 10.3, whichever occurs first. Section 10.4. Reports. The Developer must submit to the Authority a written report regarding business subsidy goals and results by no later than March 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2001 and continuing until the later of (i) the date the goals stated Section 10.1(c) are met; (ii) 30 days after expiration of the five -year period described in Section 10.1(f); or (iii) if the goals are not met, the date the subsidy is repaid in accordance with Section 10.3. The report must comply with Section 116J.994, subdivision 7 of the Business Subsidy Act. The Authority will provide information to the Developer regarding the required forms. If the Developer fails to timely file any report required under this Section 10.4, the Authority will mail the Developer a warning within one week after the required filing date. If, after 14 days of the postmarked date of the warning, the RHB- 1 83249v3 17 LN 140 -72 AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 00 -03 approving the proposed business subsidy to Marmon /Keystone VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: Light industrial projects in the Apollo Business Center are consistent with the city's comprehensive plan designed to encourage economic growth and diversity. As part of the Lino Lakes Town Center, the projects moving into the park play a significant role in providing a critical mass of development to support retail and service businesses in the commercial center. This project is also consistent with the city's need to recover the return on its investment in the existing infrastructure within the park. This resolution recognizes that Marmon /Keystone meets the goals and objectives outlined by the EDA in its business subsidy criteria. This project must go through a series of approvals, including approval of the development agreement, site and building plan and conditional use permit. The city council will be considering the site plan and CUP at the August 28 council meeting. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -03 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 00 -03 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVING BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO MARMON/KEYSTONE BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority as follows: Section 1. Recitals • • 1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") approved a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan ") for the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -9 (TIF District No. 1 -9) on December 14, 1998. 1.02. On December 14, 1998, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Plan. 1.03 On November 8, 1999, following a public hearing, the Authority approved the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Business Subsidy Criteria (the "Criteria "), pursuant to Minnesota Statute, sections 116J.993 through 1161.995 (the `Business Subsidy Act. ") 1.04. Marmon/Keystone, a Minnesota Corporation, (the 'Developer") has requested a business subsidy through tax increment financing in the amount of $322,242 for the construction of a light industrial facility in the Apollo Business Center. 1.05. Pursuant to Section 116J.994, subd. 5 of the Business Subsidy Act, the Authority has on this date held a public hearing on the proposed subsidy to the Developer, following published notice as required by law, at which hearing all persons wishing to express an opinion were given an opportunity to do so. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy is in the best interest of the Authority because it is consistent with and promotes the goals established by the Authority in adopting the Criteria. 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that granting the business subsidy to the Developer furthers the Authority's general plan of economic development of the community by encouraging growth and expansion of an industrial park which has not been used to its full potential. 2.03. Pursuant to the Criteria established by the Authority, it is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy promotes the following: 1. Encourages economic and commercial diversity within the community; • 2. Contributes to the establishment of a critical mass of commercial development within an area; and 3. Encourages full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. Section 3. Authorization. 3.01. The business subsidy to the Developer as described above is hereby approved. 3.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Development Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement required by the Business Subsidy Act, and other appropriate documents to facilitate the finalization of the business subsidy to the Developer. 3.03. Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary or convenient to effect the intent of this resolution, including seeking approval of the subsidy from the Lino Lakes City Council. Dated: , 2000. President 411 ATTEST: • Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Marmon /Keystone VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: This development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to Marmon/Keystone for the construction of an 83,000 square foot facility on 8 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center (see attached map). The total minimum market value (MMV) of the completed project will be $3,152,600. In this agreement, the city agrees to provide tax increment financing totaling $322,242, which amounts to approximately 10% of the MMV. The agreement removes the assessments of $139,839 upfront, plus a $5,000 escrow, which will be returned to the company when the building is complete. The remaining pay - as- you -go TIF amounts to $177,403. It will be used to assist with the cost of the land, except for $3,000, which will be used to assist with maintenance of the native landscaping on the site. The city will be reimbursed first for the assessments and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated payback is in December 2005. This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($38,994). It is the city's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and Marmon /Keystone 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Section 4.3. Certificate of Completion. (a) Promptly after completion of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the Construction Plans and all terms of this Agreement, the Authority will furnish the Developer with a Certificate of Completion. The Certificate of Completion shall be in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto. Such certification by the Authority shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement with respect to the obligations of the Developer to construct the Minimum Improvements and the date for the completion thereof. (b) The Certificate of Completion provided for in this section 4.3 shall be in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments pertaining to the Property. If the Authority refuses or fails to provide certification in accordance with the provisions of this section 4.3, the Authority shall, within ten (10) days after written request by the Developer, provide the Developer with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects the Developer has failed to complete the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts it will be necessary, in the opinion of the Authority, for the Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. (c) The construction of the Minimum Improvements shall be deemed to be completed when such Minimum Improvements Are substantially completed by certification of the architect of record. The Minimum Improvements will be deemed to be substantially completed when the Minimum Improvements have received a certificate of occupancy from the City's building official. Section 4.4. Reconstruction of Minimum Improvements. If the Minimum Improvements are damaged or destroyed before or after completion thereof but before the Termination Date, the Developer agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements so that the Minimum Improvements and the Property have a value at least equal to the Minimum Market Value. The Minimum Improvements shall be reconstructed in accordance with the Construction Plans, or such modifications thereto as may be requested by the Developer and approved by the Authority and the City. Section 4.5. Property Taxes; Special Assessments. After closing, the Developer agrees to pay all ad valorem taxes and special assessments on the Minimum Improvements and the Property as they become due. The Developer shall not cause the Property to be removed from the public tax rolls or to become exempt from assessment for general real estate taxes by reason of any conveyance, lease, abatement or other action prior to the Termination Date. ARTICLE V Public Assistance Section 5.1. Special Assessments. The City has levied or will levy Special Assessments against the Property in the principal amount of $139,839 for the Public Improvements which have been constructed and which benefit the Property. The Authority agrees to arrange with the City for the satisfaction of the Special Assessments against the Property at the time of issuance of a Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements by paying the Special Assessments at RH B- 183249v3 LN 140 -72 8 • • that time in full or by arranging with the City for a schedule of payments, including principal and interest at a rate of 8 percent per annum. Section 5.2. Administrative Fee. The Developer has paid the Authority the Administrative Fee in the amount of $5,000 to partially cover the Authority's expenses in negotiating this Agreement and other costs associated with the project. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the Administrative Fee upon issuance of the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements. Section 5.3. Property Write Down. In order to facilitate the financial feasibility of the development of the Property and in consideration for the Developer's fulfillment of its covenants and obligations under this Agreement, the Authority agrees to write down the cost of the Property for the Developer. The Developer represents that it has entered into an agreement to purchase the Property from the Seller for $435,600, which price is subject to an adjustment for exact acreage of no more than ± $5,000. The Developer agrees to provide the Authority a copy of the purchase agreement to verify the price of the Property. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer $174,403 out of Available Tax Increment for the cost of the Property. Section 5.4. Native Landscaping. The City has requested the Developer to install native landscaping on the' Property after completion of the Minimum Improvements. Native landscaping requires a degree of maintenance while the plantings become established which is greater than more traditional landscaping. Maintenance of native landscaping is generally provided by persons familiar with the environmental and ecological demands of such vegetation. If the Developer installs native vegetation on the Property, the Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the cost of maintaining the vegetation in an amount not to exceed $3,000; provided, however, that the Developer by the time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy must provide a copy of an executed agreement between the Developer and an individual or firm experienced in maintenance of native vegetation for a minimum of three years after issuance of the Certificate of Completion or installation of the native vegetation, whichever occurs last. Reimbursement for the maintenance of the native vegetation shall be made out of Available Tax increment. Section 5.5. No Representation Regarding Available Tax Increment. The Authority's financial commitment under this Agreement is a revenue obligation only and will be paid by the Authority only after Tax Increment has been used to fully pay for the Special Assessments, including principal and interest, and to reimburse the Authority for the Administration Expenses. The Authority makes no representations or warranties that the Available Tax Increment will be sufficient to pay the Developer for the Land Write Down and other costs. The Developer acknowledges that Available Tax Increment is subject to calculations by the County and changes in State law and that some or all of the Land Write Down and other costs may not be repaid prior to the Termination Date. The Developer also acknowledges that the estimates of Available Tax Increment which may have been made by the Authority or its agents, officers or employees are estimates only and are not intended for the Developer's reliance. R1113- 183249v3 LN 140 -72 9 z zj o y Ell 111 t mob •alw ism g y ID N 0 m M 10 Y - 6t 'O; AVM-1994 NNna1 31V1S I LLJ 1 Z 1 0 R EHABILITATIONi m 3n 3AV— Hlandi to a • top d .(d31363.. ' Nd3SO/' 1Nlt>S z o fr 4 4 Q Q 0 11-0 W 0 U N379 �Alao Illtld ©©i ii• N 11' ESN c 10 v3r 0 o73ANAI3w m 0 m 10 10 w re) O N w M M tl- V! t� 0 N 3OIN3AV N 1- t0 ti co 161100 3 ioun0 N ( a. 1) Oa VN03l Q. O -N - Pr) �i- to W Q 6 = N U = U W 1- NIM QL N 0 0 a4 /1.'n ail _aN r_ 1 V 0 N 01 N 10 N 10 MOOV3P �� ZI HVS • • • AGENDA ITEM 4 A. STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 9 August 2000 SUBJECT Hiring of Les Rydeen VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The last day of work for Randy Meyer, our city mechanic was August 4. We were fortunate enough to have had Les Rydeen working along side Randy for the past several months in a seasonal capacity. When asked about continuing with the city in a full -time capacity, he accepted. Les has been doing a great job as mechanic, and comes highly recommended by our Public Works Superintendent. This offer is contingent upon a physical exam, and pre - employment drug test. OPTIONS 1. Extend a conditional offer of employment to Les Rydeen. 2. Continue the search for a new mechanic. RECOMMENDATION Number One • • AGENDA ITEM 4B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 14 August 2000 SUBJECT 2001 Commission and Media Center Budgets VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Please find for your review and approval the 2001 Budgets for both the North Central Metro Telecommunications Commission ( "Commission ") and the North Metro Media Center ( "Media Center "). The Commission's operating budget for 2001 is proposed at $272,478. This is an increase of $59,433 over the 2000 budget. The increases are primarily in the following areas: > Digital equipment acquisition & facility improvement. > Legal and consulting bills due to franchising and renewal process > Lobbying activities designed to combat legislation that could prove devastating to local franchising authority. The Media Center proposed budget for 2001 is proposed at $509,280. This includes a recommendation from the Operating Committee (city administrator /staff member from each member city) that the subscriber's monthly PEG fee be increased from $2.25 /month to $2.30 /month. The increase is necessary for the Media Center to meet marketing, staffmg and equipment goals over the next five years. The city will be receiving approximately $27,500.00 in franchise fees in 2001. OPTIONS 1. Approve the budgets as presented. 2. Request additional information. RECOMMENDATION Number One. North Metro Telecommunications Commission Media Center July 20, 2000 Mr. Dan Tesch NMTC /Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Liino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: APPROVAL OF 2001 COMMISSION AND MEDIA CENTER BUDGETS Dear Mr. Tesch: Enclosed, please find for the council's review and approval the 2001 Budgets for both the North Metro Telecommunications Commission ( "Commission ") and the North Metro Media Center ( "Media Center "). I. 2001 COMMISSION BUDGET The Commission's operating budget for 2001 is proposed at $272,478. This is an increase of $59,433 over the 2000 budget. The increase is due primarily to the creation of two new line items developed to support the organization's stated goals of digital equipment acquisition and facility improvement. It also reflects anticipated additional needs in the legal, consulting, and legislative affairs line items, due to the competitive franchising and renewal processes and heightened lobbying activity to combat legislation that could prove devastating to local franchising authority. Recommendation: That the Member Cities approve the 2001 Commission Budget as recommended by the Commission Executive Committee and the Operations Committee. II. 2001 MEDIA CENTER BUDGET The amended Joint Powers Agreement established an "Operations Committee" which is composed of Member City administrators. Their primary responsibility is to provide input to the operation and budget of the Community Media Center. Enclosed is the 2001 Media Center budget proposed by the Operations Committee and recommended by the Commission Executive Committee for approval by its Member Cities. 1630 —1015` Avenue Northeast, Blaine, MN 55449 -4419 Phone: (612) 780 -8241 Fax: (612) 780 -8242 Blaine • Centerville • Circle Pines • Ham Lake • Lexington • Lino Lakes • Spring Lake Park • The Media Center proposed budget is $509,280. This budget is composed of operating expenditures totaling $503,280 and capital expenditures of $6,000. In addition to the budget, the Operations Committee has also proposed an increase in the subscriber's monthly PEG fee from $2.25 /month to $2.30 /month. The Memorandum of Understanding between the Member Cities and MediaOne allows for an annual cost of living increase in the PEG fee. The five cent increase represents a 2.2% CPI average. The increased funding is necessary for the Media Center to meet marketing, staffing, and equipment goals over the next five years. The Commission Executive Committee is recommending this increase in the PEG fee. • • Recommendation: That Member Cities approve the 2001 Media Center budget and increase in the PEG fee to $2.30 /month as presented by the Commission Executive Committee and Operations Committee. The Joint Powers Agreement states, "submitted budgets shall be deemed approved by a Member City unless, prior to October 15 preceding the effective date of the proposed budget, the Member City gives notice in writing to the Commission that it is withdrawing from the Commission." I want to thank the Commission directors, staff, and the Operations Committee for their efforts in preparing these budgets. If you have any questions about either budget please consult with your Commission director or City Administrator. This past year has been a busy year for the Commission with the ongoing franchise renewal analysis and negotiations, the system ownership transfer, and the introduction of competitive franchising issues. I look forward to working with all parties throughout the remainder of 2000 to continue our renewal negotiation efforts and to increase both the quality and quantity of community programming in 2001. Enc. cc. NMTC Directors Operations Committee NMTC Member Cities Sincerely, Richard Swanson Chair, NMTC ` i Cente '. Draft Budgets 2001 • Goals 2001 Report pp. 1 -7 • Equipment Replacement Plan pp. 8 -13 • Commission Revenue /Expenditure Summary p. 14 • Draft Cable Commission Budget pp. 15 -17 • Media Center Revenue /Expenditure Summary p. 18 • Draft Media Center Budget pp. 19 -22 • Commission Line Item Supporting Material pp. 23 -24 • Media Center Line Item Supporting Material pp. 25 -26 • North Metro Franchise Fee History p. 27 • Estimated Subscriber Growth pp. 28 -29 • Media Center Estimated Five Year Finances p. 30 • Prospective Franchise Fees Back to Cities 2001 p. 31 • Prospective Internet Fees Back to Cities 2002 p.32 1 t iVie Media Center G Channel 15 is the showplace of all that we do at the North Metro Media Center. For people who utilize our facility, it is where they view the results of their labor. For many people, what they see on the channel shapes their opinion regarding community programming as a whole. Community television will probably never look like broadcast television, but there are some things we can do to ensure a positive viewing experience. Our goal is to significantly improve the presentation of programs on the channel. In May of 2000, a position was created that included program processing and master control as primary responsibilities. This was a significant step, as it gave recognition to the importance of having a staff person dedicated to these tasks, and the impact they have on the look of the channel. We plan to fully implement the following channel improvements by 2001: • Program Transitions Each program submitted for playback must have the length of the program and cue time documented. This information is used by the master control operator when displaying the program on the channel. Unfortunately, producers don't always use exact times. If the improper information is provided, the program doesn't start at the right time or may end early or late. Every new program, submitted for playback, will be checked, by staff, for accuracy. This will ensure programs start and end at the proper time. 1 • • • • Audio Levels Because public access programs are produced by people with varying degrees of skill, audio levels on the finished products vary greatly. Our goal is to provide some consistency by adjusting the audio levels for each program when it is played on the channel. This can be done, to some extent currently, but will require some additional audio equipment, to accomplish completely. If the franchise renewal includes the master control allowance that was requested, the cost of this equipment would be covered. • Appearance of Data Pages Community bulletin board information on channel 15, and the program schedules on channel 57 are commonly referred to as data pages. We use the Scala graphics design system to create and display these pages. Our plans to improve the appearance of the channels include creating a fresh, easy to read format for the program schedules, more frequent cycling of community bulletin board pages, utilizing varied design strategies that include photographs and more complex artwork, and diligent attention to accuracy in spelling and information presentation. • 24/7 Programming It is in our best interest to provide the most versatile playback schedule possible to attract more viewers. In other words, if we want people to watch City Scope we probably shouldn't schedule it oposite ER. To this end we plan to expand our playback schedule from the current 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., to 24 hours a day, seven days a week. By playing programs like City Scope, Perspectives, and Crime Time at various times throughout the day and night, we hope to catch the attention of a larger audience. Increasing the Media Center's visibility in our communities remains a primary goal. That objective will be met by continuing to increase name recognition of the facility and channel, and developing partnerships with non - profit and service organizations. Extraordinary efforts need to be made in this area. The 1999/2000 Viewer Survey indicated that we have a solid base viewership. It also showed that levels of peripheral viewers are quite high, indicating an excellent potential for increasing this base. Before we conduct another Viewer Survey, in 2002, we want to do all we can to improve channel awareness and viewership. The 2001 budget reflects this support. Money will be utilized to carry on marketing efforts initiated last year, including the monthly newsletter, colored paper for flyers, supplies for PR kits, ad space on high school sports posters, and t- shirts, hats, mugs, etc. for our volunteer incentive program. We would also like to try some new approaches such as full color posters promoting City Scope and the Job Show, to be displayed in local businesses affiliated with the Chambers of Commerce, and the inclusion of a regular Media Center column in city newsletters. Below, I've highlighted four marketing techniques we will emphasize across the year. 2 • • • Flyers Informational flyers have become a mainstay for getting the word out about playback schedules for events shot with the van. Taking this promotional tool one step further, we are trying to cross promote other programs at van shoots. Someone who is interested in seeing what time their son's game is going to be on TV might also find City Scope an interesting program to watch. Our ultimate plan is to have every staff member distribute flyers anytime they are out in the public working on any program. • PR Kits We will continue to produce a folder of information, regarding our facility and services, which we can tailor to specific audiences. The folder includes a facility brochure, a flyer specifiying the services we can provide to that particular group, stamped, self- addressed response postcards, and an introductory letter from the Executive Director inviting that group to utilize our services. Each PR kit is tailored to appeal to the group we are targeting, whether it be a non - profit organization, a service club, a business sponsorship or a school career services program. • Outreach Taking the PR kits one step further, staff will be increasing efforts to physically meet with groups and organizations. Once folks have been introduced to community programming via the PR kit, an appropriate staff member will arrange a meeting to emphasize the opportunities available. A standard presentation, that can be adapted for different groups, will be developed. • City Scope and Job Show Posters We have been working hard to develop a mutually beneficial partnership between the Media Center and the local Chambers of Commerce. Currently, local businesses are highlighted in a segment on City Scope. Plus, the Job Show, designed for use by businesses to publicize employment opportunities is in the development stages. We believe Chamber affiliated businesses would be willing to display full color posters advertising City Scope and the Job Show. We also hope to display the posters in the MediaOne customer service office, local city halls, schools and libraries. The foundation for our development of partnerships, with community organizations, will be the programming outlets offered to them for their information. Several programs have already been developed by staff to serve this function, including "City Scope," "Perspectives," "Crime Time," and "Sports Center Spotlight." In addition to producing these programs on a regular basis, we want to create new shows to address issues or areas we're currently missing. New shows that will be produced regularly include: 3 • • • • The Job Show This is a program designed to promote employment opportunities available with local chamber affiliated businesses. The show will include a host intro, graphic pages created for each job posting with a voice -over of the information, a video package highlighting the job of the month, and a host closing. Both Chambers have been approached regarding this program, and both have indicated high interest and promised promotional support. The program would be produced at least once monthly. • Municipal Issue Infomercials At the joint Operations Committee /Cable Commission meeting on March 30, 2000, members expressed a strong interest in the production of municipal issue infomercials. Staff is eager to work with city representatives to, first, identify those topics, whether it be recycling, snow- plowing, or fire - hydrant maintenance, and then produce a program informing viewers about that topic. Our goal is to produce three to four of these infomercials per year. • Civic Issue Forum (Live or tape- delayed) Every City has issues that inspire debate. Often that debate includes misconceptions and rumors mixed with fact. Staff would like to provide the opportunity for City Managers, Mayors, planners and /or elected officials to form a panel to discuss these issues on television. The forum could be cablecast live, or tape delayed. It could be done with an audience posing questions, or in a closed studio. There are many options. This type of program could be produced on a regular basis, cycling between cities, or it could simply be produced when a city has an issue they would like to clarify or explore. • Bulletin Board Content Expansion (Personal Announcements) While contemplating additional services the Media Center could provide the general public, we thought adding "personal announcements" to our current Community Bulletin Board would offer viewers an additional outlet for celebrating an event. Guidelines would need to be created regarding types of announcements accepted, length of display, lead time etc. Once guidelines are established, we could begin displaying wedding, anniversary, birth, and obituary information. Plans exist to improve our current training procedures and to add classes that focus on a somewhat ignored segment of community television, viewers. Below, please find improvements scheduled for full implementation in 2001: • Training Manuals Staff is creating a training manual, utilizing our digital camera and desktop publishing software, that will serve as a handy and informative reference for people taking our classes. Students will be given a binder at the introductory class, containing guidelines, a general overview of community television and information about the services we provide. As additional classes are taken, students will be able to add the materials, from that class, to their binders. 4 • Class Schedules We currently teach classes to individuals or groups as they are requested. This system works very well, as we can concentrate on the specific skills which that person or group needs to know to produce the program they have in mind. We have no intention of eliminating this teaching procedure, but we do plan to add pre - scheduled production classes on a quarterly basis. This will provide an opportunity for folks to sign up for an organized class, without having to take the step of setting one up with staff. Classes will be promoted via the channel, press releases, articles submitted to city newsletters, and, if possible, community education catalogues. • Specialized Production Classes In addition to commonly taken classes like camera operation and editing, we would like to provide several more specialized production classes throughout the year. Examples of these classes would be advanced lighting techniques, hosting or anchoring techniques, or marketing your program. Thought has also been given to securing the services of guest speakers or instructors. • Community Television Literacy Classes A great deal of focus is given to teaching people how to make television programs. While we certainly plan to continue to teach video production, we would also like to concentrate some effort on reaching those people who may never actually produce a program. Many people stumble across the community television channel and wonder what in the world it is. They may be curious about why the program looks like it was made by an amateur, or how it got played over the cable system. Staff is very excited about developing a Community Media Literacy curriculum. This class will be scheduled quarterly and marketed to individuals who simply want to know more about the channels and community television in general. Community Media Literacy materials will also be included in actual video production classes. The Media Center facility situation remains an open question. It was determined that moving into the Blaine municipal facility was not economically feasible, and that we may be best off remaining at our current location. Consideration is being given to continuing to rent the current facility, offering to buy the current facility, building a new facility, or outfitting and renting a new space. We have recently learned that MediaOne will be moving their head -end out of the Blaine location as soon as their lease is up around the end of 2001. This will, of course, require the development of a new lease between the Commission /Media Center and the budding owners. Chances are quite high that we will remain where we are. The building could use some improvements such as new paint and carpeting, and a garage, but it should be sufficient space to meet our needs down the road. 5 • • • Deciding whether to continue to rent or to buy our own facility is the question that will need to be answered soon. Line items have been created, in both budgets, for funding to put toward possible facility changes and /or improvements. t Our equipment purchase plan remains on track. The immediate goals remain to replace the Amiga graphics computers, move to a digital format, purchase and outfit an improved production truck, and rebuild master control. Our intent is to be extremely conservative in our equipment purchases in 2001. Short of impossible to predict breakdowns, we plan to buy no equipment in 2001, other than completing the permanent news set for City Scope. Our next steps into the digital format and the purchase and outfitting of a new truck will both be extremely expensive ventures. A large amount of money will need to be accumulated, over the next several years, in order to make those purchases possible. Franchise renewal also affects our move into the digital format, as having MediaOne outfit master control with new equipment is a part of our renewal proposal. If replacement of master control equipment is included in the franchise renewal, we could begin the process in 2001. We would start with an upgrade to our Scala graphics system, audio equipment, and some digital machine control cards and digital playback decks. Introducing digital equipment in master control will dictate when we can buy digital mastering equipment for other areas of our facility. PEG We are currently at the maximum PEG Fee level allowed by our memorandum of understanding. We are, however, allowed to increase that level annually to cover cost of living increases. We suggest doing that this year, and every year thereafter. The average CPI for 1999 was 2.2 %. Increasing the PEG Fee by this amount results in a 5 cent increase per subscriber, per month, to $2.30. Purchasing and outfitting a new truck and moving into the digital format are hugely expensive undertakings. Frankly, without increased monetary support, either from additional PEG Fees and /or donations from franchise fees, they're going to be very difficult to accomplish. In addition to suggesting increasing the PEG Fee by 2.2 %, two new line items have been included in the Cable Commission budget, an equipment fund and a building fund transfer, for your consideration. 6 • Purchasing a production truck • Outfitting the truck with digital equipment • Purchasing digital equipment for the studios and edit suites • Purchasing or improving a Media Center /Commission facility Approving the increase in the PEG Fee and the new grant line items in the Cable Commission budget would greatly assist us in meeting our goals for the future. Many changes have taken place, over the last year, regarding the operation of the North Metro Media Center. The introduction of new staff, a marketing plan, and a re- organization of responsibilities and priorities have all helped to focus efforts in a unified direction. While we have very successfully begun the task of becoming vital partners of community organizations, clubs, schools and even local businesses, we have much further to go. Expectations remain high for North Metro Channel 15's place in our communities. With the continued support of the Operations Committee and Cable Commission, staff will make every effort possible to meet and exceed the goals we have established. 7 • Met lqedm Center Equipment Replacement Plan BACKGROUND The following is an equipment replacement plan intended to be implemented, funding permitting, over the five -year period from 2001 -2005. It has been organized in three parts: • A general overview of the major directions we are moving with respect to equipment. • A specific breakdown of the equipment we feel should be purchased in 2001. • A general breakdown of the equipment to be purchased in 2002, 2003, 2004 and beyond The yearly equipment purchase lists are based on our previous equipment purchases, our best assessment of the condition of our current equipment, financial standing and how to best continue integration of a new equipment format. Several factors are considered when determining what will need to be purchased, and when. Equipment will only be replaced when it has outlived its useful life. Useful life is determined by examining the following factors. • Does the equipment function reliably? • Does it cost more to repair it than to replace it? • What is the length of repair? The frequency of repairs? • Are parts and support readily available? The recommendations being made for new equipment purchases are based on several factors. • Reliability and accessibility of the manufacturer • Flexibility of use, both alone and within systems • Industry standards and trends • Our production needs • What we can afford and when 8 • • • GENERAL EQUIPMENT DIRECTION • Elimination of Amiga Computer Systems Over the past few years we have replaced all but two of our Amiga graphics and editing computer systems. The two remaining Amiga systems (one in the public edit suite and one in the studio control room) are currently functioning adequately. While replacement of these systems remains important as they are no longer supported by their manufacturer and do experience problems, we'd like to continue to use them until they must be replaced. When that time does come, the current plan is to replace the studio Amiga with the PC based Compix graphics system. It is capable of producing complex graphics, but is also relatively simple to learn. This is important as the general public utilizes this studio. This is the same system currently utilized in the production truck, which means staff will not have to learn an additional graphics program to use in the studio. It also means that graphics created for use in the truck could also be used in the studio. There is a tentative plan to replace the Video Toaster editing system, in the public edit suite, with the PC based Genie editing system, from the staff edit suite. Staff is currently researching the Trinity system for the staff edit suite. It has an excellent switcher, and graphics program, and is capable of both linear and non - linear editing. There have been rumors, however, that problems exist with the editing software. The expectation is that this problem, and any other bugs, will be worked out by the time we are prepared to invest in this system. Staff continues to research a variety of possibilities in the event the Trinity editing system remains problematic. Costs: Compix software and hardware $6,000 Trinity software and hardware $25,000 • Master Control Upgrade A request for MediaOne to front a comprehensive master control upgrade has been included in the franchise renewal process. At this point there haven't been any objections from the company regarding the inclusion of this upgrade. Questions remain as to how that funding would be distributed. It is known that the upgrade will cost between $360,000 and $400,000 and be recouped by the company. If the franchise is renewed and includes the master control upgrade we would like to begin making master control purchases in 2001. Recently, staff has learned that Di -Tech Corporation, the producers of our automated switching system, is going out of business. We had planned to replace our old Di -Tech system with a new one, but now we must begin researching alternative routing systems. In addition to a new routing system, the master control upgrade includes purchasing digital and SVHS tape decks, monitors for each tape deck, three color monitors, test equipment, audio /video distribution /amplification equipment, modulators, de- modulators, an upgrade of our Scala graphics system and all the cabling, connectors, and parts necessary to connect the equipment. It is necessary to establish some degree of digital playback capability in master control before we can begin digital mastering in the truck, studio, and edit suites. 9 Cost: Routing System to replace Di Tech: $60,000 Digital and SVHS tape decks, cards, rack mounts: $201,700 Monitors: $25,000 Scala software and hardware upgrade: $20,000 Audio and Video distribution /amplification: $30,000 Cabling, connectors, parts: $8,000 Test Equipment: $7,000 Misc. Equipment: $10,000 • Move to a Digital Format Over the past several years we have begun purchasing DVCPro equipment. This is a new tape format so it needs to be introduced in steps. The first step was to purchase acquisition equipment, or cameras. The second step was tape decks to allow us to edit from the DVCPro format to a format we could play on the channel. The third step is to purchase mastering and playback equipment. This will allow us to tape, edit, and playback in the DVCPro format. The first two steps have been initiated. We are capable of recording and editing in the DVCPro format. We are now poised to purchase mastering equipment for the staff edit suite, the production truck, and the studio. At the same time we will need playback decks and digital control cards, for the routing system, in master control. Cost: 6 DVCPro Edit/Record Decks $48,000 1 Edit Controller $1,500 • The Production Truck Everyone is aware of our current production truck's mounting problems. Thanks to a $62,232 grant from the Cable Commission and three years of saving on the part of the Media Center, we will have enough to purchase a production truck by the end of 2000. We will not be anywhere near our goal of having enough money to outfit the truck with new digital equipment. The plan is to hold on to the current truck, as long as it is economically and safely feasible, with the hope that we would eventually have enough money to buy new equipment. The likelihood is that we will need to purchase a new truck before we can outfit it with new equipment. In this instance, we would simply transfer the video production equipment from the old truck to the new, and replace equipment as we could afford it. Consideration has been given to keeping the old truck, in addition to the new production facility. After weighing the truck's current condition and the cost of outfitting and maintaining equipment in two trucks, it has been determined to be very unlikely that we could afford to do so. While the production truck is arguably our most important production tool, maintaining and and outfitting two trucks would monopolize resources that will be needed to provide adequate field, editing, and studio equipment also. In a perfect world, when we replace the truck, we would also upgrade some of the major video production equipment systems. Additional DVCPro decks, a digital switcher /DVE, a digital audio /video router and distribution amplification system, and digital cameras and Triax cables would be purchased. With digital cameras, decks and a switcher, our finished product would 10 • be true digital. Since most of the programs produced by staff are shot with the truck, this would vastly improve the technical quality of most programs played on the public access channel. The new production truck will be with us for a long time. It is our goal to outfit it with equipment that will last just as long. High quality digital equipment is expensive, but it will vastly improve our output and our capabilities. There are also many possibilities for the truck in the future. We will continue to cover local events, concerts and sports. We will also be able to use the truck as an additional edit suite for staff, and as an additional control room. We cannot rule out the possibility that we may need to seek additional funding in the future. A production truck outfitted with superior production tools could certainly be used as a revenue generator. Many access centers have developed departments assigned to commercial production work. While this isn't currently a plan of ours, it could certainly be a possibility or a necessity in the future. Cost: 4 cameras, lenses, Control Units, Triax Adaptors, $150,000 Router $35,000 RTS Intercom System $34,000 Monitors $20,000 Switcher /DVE $102,300 DEKO Digital Graphics $10,000 Cables, Converters, DAs, Connectors $30,000 RECOMMENDED 2001 PURCHASES With our year 2001 equipment purchases, we would like to achieve the following goals: • Complete the City Scope set • Begin the master control upgrade • Save money for future truck upgrades • City Scope Set Construction on the City Scope set started in 2000. Money was spent to create a backdrop. In 2001 we would like to complete the set with risers, a desk, signage and additional decorative touches. • Master Control Upgrade (phase one of three) The master control upgrades will be completed across three years. At this point, staff feels we should replace our Di -Tech with a new routing system, upgrade the Scala graphics system, and introduce at least four DVCPro playback decks during the first phase, in 2001. • Save Money As you have seen by reviewing the general equipment goals, replacing and outfitting the production truck and moving to the digital format are expensive propositions. Clearly, we can only purchase what we can afford. Staff is working to save money, with the hope that the truck 11 • and equipment can be replaced simultaneously. The expectation is that the truck will have to be replaced first. In this instance, equipment from the old truck will continue to be utilized in the new truck, until we can afford the digital replacements. As the new equipment is put in place, the old truck equipment will be used to outfit a control room for the second studio. With this goal in mind, we plan to replace no equipment in 2001. However, if an essential piece of equipment ceases to function, we will have to tap into the equipment fund to replace it. FUTURE EQUIPMENT PURCHASES • 2002 Phase two of the master control upgrade will be the primary concern in 2002. We will want to purchase some DVCPro playback decks and cards, SVHS playback decks and cards, and DVCPro play /record decks for a dub rack Hopefully we can also purchase some DVCPro mastering equipment for the studio, staff edit suite, and truck. We will continue to make contributions to the equipment fund. • 2003 • The final phase of the equipment upgrade in master control will be undertaken. This will include additional tape decks, audio and video distribution amplifiers, test equipment, monitors and modulation equipment. Additional DVCPro mastering equipment purchases may be made We will continue to make contributions to the equipment fund • 2004 and beyond By 2005, we could possibly have the money to fully outfit a new production truck with digital equipment. Our goal is to outfit the truck so that its output is true digital. This would require us to buy a digital switcher, audio and video routers and distribution amplification system, and cameras. We could buy the equipment in pieces, but that would be more expensive for us in the long run. If you are using analog equipment and digital equipment simultaneously you need additional equipment (cards) to translate the signals between the equipment. This can actually be quite expensive, and unnecessary if all of our equipment was digital to begin with. If we can wait until 2004 -2005 to buy both the new truck and digital equipment, we will. If we have to purchase the truck earlier, we will continue to use the equipment from the old truck until we can afford to replace all of it with digital equipment. At that time, the old equipment will be used to outfit a control room for the second studio. • • • Switcher /DVE The switcher is the heart of the production truck. All signals are routed into it, and it selects the final program signal. Staff has been researching digital switchers through trade magazines, the internet, our vendors and at the NAB conference. There are several varieties we are looking at. The important aspects for us are that it be digital, the number of inputs and whether it has a built in DVE. By purchasing a switcher with a built in DVE we can save up to $25,000 over buying the two pieces of equipment separately. Digital Cameras with Triax Cabling For the truck to be true digital we will need digital cameras. To maximize the production capabilities of our truck a minimum of four cameras is required. Instead of purchasing the typical multi -pin cable, we recommend triax cable. It is more compatible with the industry standard, lighter, and easier to maintain than multi -pin cable. Whenever we have a problem with our current multi -pin cable we have to ship it out for repair. Each time we have to ship cables out it takes one to two months to get them back, and it's expensive. With triax cable, we will be of capable in -house repair. Digital AudioNideo Routers and Distribution Amplification System This equipment will give us maximum input/output flexibility for mobile productions. This will allow us to route any audio and /or video source to any destination without having to disconnect or rewire any equipment. RTS Intercom System This is the equipment that ties the whole van shoot together. It includes the wiring, headsets, receivers, and microphones that allow the director to communicate with camera operators and announcers. You can't do a van shoot without it. If all of the equipment is purchased, simultaneously, through one vendor it is possible to get discounts of up to 10% of the total equipment cost. This could be a significant savings for us. Summary The equipment purchases outlined in this plan will complete our goals of eliminating the Amiga computers, upgrading master control, moving us to the digital format, and outfitting us with a very high quality, flexible mobile production facility. This report outlines the major equipment replacement needs we face both now and in the future. Other equipment such as portable cameras, tripods, etc. will also need to be purchased when the current equipment breaks. Our purchase plans are based on best -case scenarios that include adequate finances and the inclusion of master control upgrades in the franchise renewal. Economics will dictate our move into the digital world. 13 1 • ESTIMATED REVENUES 2000 Franchise Fee (Payable 3/01) Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd. 1/01) ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2001 Commission Budget Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd 1/00) Franchise Fees Retained by Cities $470,000 $50,000 $272,478 $50,000 $197,522 -14- E (c-.'?1) 0. cn c 0 W i G) 2 N a) c a) 0 cC 0 0 cD C) 0 N as 0) o rn 2 0)D)0) 0 0) 0)0) C ✓ T T O • O O CD ai (On U)) 00 0 RS CD 0 C 0 c 0 0 CDCD(O O 'IY CO N N CO � C(0 IP co h. o O O 0 0 O O O 0 LO O O O M c) O 0 CO 0 0) n T aD CO (D N N I- LOCr) Cr) 1.6 r O r MOdI- O (•)0'N a T Ln T r T T T a a) a 0 0 SUB TOTAL: -15- • • d 0) COW N 0 V E N0 O V a) 1- O L 5 O z as o U Q t0f) 0 cu 0 0 a) a) 2 CO m C .c 0- (1) 0 CC) O O N T a) a) E a) - 405 n a) Q 0 0 O O O c) m w G) E c N 1 as L co a) c 0 s 0 O O Lf) C) c 0) 0 00 00 00 O N a) O 00 0 0 0 0 M N 0 0 00 0 co O O O 1st Qrtr Act. H w 10 . T co N PT" O 0 co 0 O O 0 0 O O a a L) N 00 O c1) ti N 00 N 0 0 C') 0 00 a as. 00 O O T c U ©.m 0 c 2 c. w a) U 0 a. U 0- 0 O O 0 a) U c O 4- c 2 O) 0 Commission O c 0 La 7 0 a) cc a)) O 0: N 1 T 0 0) a) 0_ O O Q) a) 0 O W C 1- -16- • co W 0 Z St L O U a) a, a) EL▪ S O. E a) a) (00) 15 J • a) a) Z O. E O O O O O co O O 0 0 0 0 r 1� O O O O O O O d7 O O O N O O M (o 0 0 (O (r) 0 co E 0 E N V CD 1- 0 L <O O O O CD N (D T O O 0 O O c▪ ) T O O O to N O O O Cf) O O O 00 O O T 00 O O O O Lt) O 0 MIN O O 0 CV O O 0 N C) O O CO O LO (r) O O O a) U N a) O 0 0 as N O 0 co U c m ,a? 0 co 8 O O O (f) 10 To J a) E E > O 0 O O O co Q y L w a) (0 a) CO T N O O m ouk E F— _n. O• 2 W O a 0m SUB TOTAL -17- ESTIMATED REVENUES 2001 PEG Fees ($2.30 /18,500Subs. /Mo.) $510,600 Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd. 1/01) $119,354 Capital Equip. Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/01) $92,011 • Truck Replacement Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/01) $162,232 Building Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/01) $30,000 Other Income $62,000 Interest Income $28,000 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES Media Center Operating Budget Operating Reserve (1/4 of Budget) Equipment Purchases Truck Replacement Fund Capital Equipment Fund Building Fund TOTAL $503,280 $125,820 $6,000 $162,232 $116,865 $90,000 N H O z 0 w Q a) y c a) a) .c 0 O o �, C cC 12 a) N CC COC O 0. 0. O C Y N a) c a) Cr) O) L. 0 0 Q a) a) J z 0) Cn a) 0 0) O Cn A CENTER BUDGET H O a N CO 0 0 N N O_ N CD O (74. co M 0 N () c) 0 0 CO N 0 0 0 C10 N 0 0 0 O O O O O to 0 a) co 0 3 E co n O 0303 cm co O o CC) CD d' O N- o M O N r n O Cr) Lo O O co O Q O 5 O r 0 N � w N. CO CO ) CO CV C9 Cq C co O N, 0 CD Cn N M O O O In O O O Cn I0 1 CO N CO (1q CD O O Cr) Cn 0) M O O) M ((0 C N CO CA N_ T ti d' eP M T CA N C) M Co 1-- N N COhl� CO r r N Cr) Cr) 1 L 0 0 > 0 X w 1 L co 1111 as O O 0�Uo O — O 0 2 - 0 a. E 0 0 O O N a20H C 0 w N cn Q 0 2. Health /Dental -19- O O O _M N O N rn rn 0 `) o z.. c n m 0 W O 0 0 000) N 0) as E a) cum 0 0 O 0) as E N a) z O co N m .Q 0 C./) c a) Q a) c0 O a .Q O 0 O O co N W 0 C) • •L �;0c a) -a5 a) Eo2w 76 c • F• D aEets� 0 0 N n z3 V F.? CO r a0°) �f-Ow .Ca3 mu) O O O O O O O O O . O O N CO CO a0 0 O er O o O O O N co w a U `m c O SUB TOTA T N. O O co O c) O ti (0 O O O (0 CO 0) 0 T N 00 N co N co 00 O co O 00 N O 00 1- 1.() N co O O N O 0 O T F 0 H m cn -20- H 0 z c 0) 0 a O O N O O O Cv) 0 O 0 cv) N z 0 N 0 0 0 0 (O t .O E c0 t U 0 (Li m 0 O 0 0 N a) c( a a) N aa)) Z >, 0 Q' w V a) (c > .,a) C E • w O n E a) w ca 0) O O O O 0 0 O O N O O O May need new generato 0 0 O O T O 0) c 0 a) cn n. 0 m a) E aS 0 a) .0 v; a) C a) (A _ m 0) N V) a) 0. Tts ca 0) 0 (o cc O 0_ c0 0 0 U O 0 O O O O O O 0) O O (�) O Q) O O O O O 10 O O O (O N O O O O tt N N N O (o O .0 N (o 0 O N N O O r (f) O O O (o O co O O O O O O O CV O O 0 O T O O co O O (o 0 Of 0 N N w Ew . O 0 c an E ` 0 0 0 C 0 0 i u) E > 'O O ^:! ¢ ¢ ¢ Conferences CI 0. L i E 2 O O U 3 d c a) E 0 a) cC m c O 0 d N a) O 0. w E N O a) as 0 cn 0 O = 0) >° 0 (0 2 (0 a) 0)• 0-a) co • cr W I— • m ca • a)-• 0 >> F O 1- D -21- r M� IWY:' Y. p y T 0 W .;' o T O 0 I— 0 N Z; LM w U w c� 0 Q m cn W 1- O z F T / a W O 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 O QS 0 (0 iv) c) 0 N 0 0 0 0 CO N O O O O M O O O O c�) 0 O M O 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 O CO -22- Commission Budget Line Item Supporting Information Personnel • All salaries are based on the pay step system established by the Operations Committee and approved by the Cable Commission. • The Executive Director salary is divided between the two budgets. • The "Accrued vacation /sick/comp" is a new line item recommended by our accountant. This line item covers time owed to an employee upon resignation. Benefits • Health benefit reflects the approved increase from $341 per month to $389.75 per month per full -time employee. • Benefits for the Executive Director are divided between the two budgets. Office Expenses • • Increased Phone /Internet line item to reflect costs of end user equipment for cable modems and the cost of maintaining a WEB site (Costs split between budgets) • Legal Expenses • Anticipation of increased costs due to competitive franchising and representation during telecommunications legislative process Other Administrative Costs • Equipment Fund Transfer $30,000 This is a new line item. Discussion was had at the Joint Operations /Commission meeting regarding the creation of this line item. It was noted, at that time, that in order to reach the goals of purchasing a new truck and moving to the digital format, additional funds would be needed. While the group had generously donated excess reserves from the Commission budget to the Media Center in the past, those excess reserves will not exist in the future. It was suggested at that time, that a line item be created in the Commission budget for a grant to be put toward the equipment fund. With the creation of this line item, excess reserves in the future would continue to go back to the cities. It is worth considering that franchise fees will continue to increase, especially when high speed Internet service is available. PEG fees will not. • Consultants Competitive franchising issues may require the work of a consultant. • Government/Legislative Affairs Next year will be a crucial one for telecommunications legislation. The very existence of PEG and franchise fees depends on a positive outcome. There are going to be high costs associated with obtaining this positive outcome • Internships This is a new line item. The Media Center is working to expand it's internship program. By dividing the costs of internships between the two budgets we would be able to double the number of paid internships we could offer. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES • Building Fund Transfer Like the equipment fund line item before it, this item was discussed at the Joint Meeting. Whether we move, buy the current building, improve the current building or build a new facility we will need funds. • • Media Center Budget Line Item Supporting Information Personnel • All salaries are based on the pay step system established by the Operations Committee and approved by the Cable Commission. • The Executive Director salary is divided between the two budgets. • The "Accrued vacation /sick/comp" is a new line item recommended by our accountant. This line item covers time owed to an employee upon resignation. • Overall increases in personnel are due to one additional full time position (approved in 2000) and general increases in staff salary. Benefits • Health benefit reflects the approved increase from $341 per month to $389.75 per month per full -time employee. • Benefits for the Executive Director are divided between the two budgets. • Overall increase is due to increase in health benefit and addition of staff Insurance /Bonds • Increased replacement cost of truck from 125,000 to 160,000, which is actual replacement cost • The "Volunteer Accident coverage" is a new line item Office Expenses • Increased Phone /Internet line item to reflect costs of end user equipment for cable modems and the cost of maintaining a WEB site (Costs split between budgets) • Overall decrease in Office Expenses due to decrease in actual property taxes and facility maintenance costs Other Administrative Costs • Advertising/Marketing Ads in School Posters $1200 Flyers in Chamber Newsletters $150 Paper for PR Kits $100 Business Cards $300 Paper for Flyers $200 Posters $1000 Incentive Items $3,200 $6,150 • Awards Ceremony/ Entry Fees Plaques $400 Ceremony Food $1000 Facility Rental $200 Video Award Entry Fee $150 $1750 • Conferences Alliance for Community Media (2 people) $2,500 National Assoc. of Broadcasters ( 1 person) $2,400 Local MACTA conferences (2 -3 people) $600 $5,500 • Consultants We will not do another viewer survey until 2002, but we may want to use a consultant for designing the City Scope set, or for marketing purposes • Memberships Alliance for Community Media $350 Sam's Club $30 Chambers $350 Arts Alliance $30 $760 • Publications Monthly newsletter 4 page 2 color glossy paper $7,800 • Tuition and Training $4,000 Increased as recommended by the Operations Committee and Cable Commission at the Joint Meeting Vehicle Expenses • Maint./ Lic. $9,600 As the truck gets older, it requires more maintenance. If we don't replace the generator in 2000, we may need to replace it in 2001. Production Expenses • Bulbs /Batteries /Other Production Costs Interns $2000 Camera Batteries $1000 Duct tape $490 Studio Bulbs $1000 $4490 • 0) N = ' CO N 0 0 N r 0) Ch 0) 0 CI n O O N CD n CI 10 I- V r N N 49 49 -27- YEAR 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 SUBSCRIBER GROWTH (Based on MediaOne Figures) # OF PAYING & NON - PAYING SUBS. AT YEAR END 18,906 17,970 16,768 15,709 14,968 13,488 11,952 AVERAGE: PAYING SUBS YEAR END '99 # SUB. INCREASE OVER PREVIOUS YEAR 936 1,202 1,059 741 1,480 1,536 371 % INCREASE 5.2% 7.2% 6.7% 5.0% 11.0% 12.9% 3.2% 1,046 7.3% AVERAGE % INCREASE EST. PAYING SUBS YEAR END '00 17,577 • 7.3% 18,860 • # Increase N .0 Cn 0) CU a ti 0) a) c 0 E ;a ca a a) L Total PEG Fee Paid Time Frame f■ O 00 O C � T T �NCO LOCO O) Cr) N r CO CD CO CO co c6 0 0 0 0 0 o o O o o 44(0 N O CD CO CO f-- f-- co d- N N N O 14 O ✓ T N I'- M ✓ r 't M N to 69 EA- V3 - 69 O 0 O O • O C C CM CO Cr) CD O) O) 0 T T i_ N r 3 Quarters 1997 • $2.25 + CPI Increase PEG Fee w /500 Annual Subscriber Growth O O N 0 N co O N N O T 0 N O 0 ESTIMATED REVENUE N_ 0 0 N N T.O. X co N (A N_ X O 0 0 O O O CO N LO X X O O O O N ci ci 0 X 0) IV X O 8 L C - M 0 X N N X 0 0 0 O ,- X 0 0, N C O Q 0 X 0 0 LO N N 0 r- O n N LO v r N 0 N N 0 00)0,000 L0 C?N000 CO C) 01 0 — r 0 0,r 0 M 0 N N 0 0 N 0 0 0 N O N O C) N r (D CO M 0) N tt 00 0,O 0 0 0 t0 V N 0 0 0 00 O) N 0 N Oj N CD �T(ON ��N000 �� 00)(NON O N 00 00 00 N � O N 0) 0) M co N n Q. q o co q. co No (ON 0 L 0 0 CO co co. O O LOO M Or N N et N 10 O N M 0) A en O M 11) O 0) ESTIMATED EXPENSES N 0 CV 0 1- 0 0 CO 0 N ((0 -a- ((0 0 r (1) CO N 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N (0+). 0 0 7 6 0 (0 O 0 co N M 0 0 O co O 0 6 or or c5 o ((j r co N r N r) ."- 8 N R 0 co q. N (NO (D N TO- CD r N r r r O o o CV LO O CO 00 0 CO 00 O 0 O 6 CO T co T ,- 0) (0 r O �t O N 0 V M 0 p 0 Q7 (NO N N N cn M co N (0 000^ 0 O) 0 N 0 O N CD 0) c m aa) o. >c x Q. -g w w .g 2 N Equipment Purchases Truck Replacement Fund O LL 0 0) E m a 0 ` 0) w cr m i0 C) > 0 — 0 0 m 0. (0 co 10 a 0) I` 0) 0 0 M Np O 0) FRANCHISE FEES DISBURSED TO CITIES IN 2000 MEMBER CITIES FRANCHISE FEES 2000 COMMISSION BUDGET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITIES 1999 430,449 CITY FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 213,045 = 217,404 TOTAL FRANCHISE % OF SYSTEM FEES RETAINED REVENUE BY CITY 2000 Blaine 217,404.00 Centerville 217,404.00 Circle Pines 217,404.00 Ham Lake 217,404.00 Lexington 217,404.00 Lino Lakes 217,404.00 Spring Lake Park 217,404.00 0.5285159 0.0320738 0.0515717 0.1130879 0.0255058 0.1537530 0.0954920 114,901.47 6,972.97 = 11,211.89 = 24,585.76 5,545.06 = 33,426.52 = 20,760.34 PROSPECTIVE FRANCHISE FEES TO BE DISBURSED TO CITIES IN 2001 MEMBER CITIES FRANCHISE FEES 2001 COMMISSION BUDGET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITIES 2000 470,000 CITY FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 272,478 197,522 TOTAL FRANCHISE % OF SYSTEM FEES RETAINED REVENUE BY CITY 2001 Blaine 197,522.00 x 0.5285159 Centerville 197,522.00 x 0.0320738 Circle Pines 197,522.00 x 0.0515717 Ham Lake 197,522.00 x 0.1130879 Lexington 197,522.00 x 0.0255058 Lino Lakes 197,522.00 x 0.1537530 Spring Lake Park 197,522.00 x 0.0954920 CITY 104,393.52 6,335.28 10,186.55 22,337.35 5,037.96 30,369.60 18,861.77 AMOUNT LESS OF TOTAL AMOUNT FRANCHISE FEES LESS FRANCHISE RETAINED % OF SYSTEM FEES RETAINED BY CITY REVENUE BY CITY 2001 Blaine 19,882.00 x 0.5285159 = 10,507.95 Centerville 19,882.00 x 0.0320738 = 637.69 Circle Pines 19,882.00 x 0.0515717 = 1,025.35 Ham Lake 19,882.00 x 0.1130879 = 2,248.41 Lexington 19,882.00 x 0.0255058 = 507.11 Lino Lakes 19,882.00 x 0.1537530 = 3,056.92 Spring Lake Park 19,882.00 x 0.0954920 = 1,898.57 PROSPECTIVE INTERNET SERVICE FRANCHISE FEES IN 2002 PROSEPECTIVE PERCENT WITH CABLE MODEM # OF SUBSCRIBERS INTERNET SERVICE SUBSCRIBERS MONTHLY TOTAL ANNUAL CABLE MODEM CABLE MODEM SUBSCRIBER FEE INCOME INTERNET FRANCHISE FEE RETAINED BY CITIES 18,915 18,915 18,915 CITY 0:15 0.20 0.25 INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 2,837 3,783 4,728 39.95 39.95 39.95 % OF SYSTEM REVENUE 1,360,058 1,813,570 2,266,603 68,003 90,679 113,330 TOTAL INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 2002 Blaine Centerville Circle Pines Ham Lake Lexington Lino Lakes Spring Lake Park CITY 68,003.00 68,003.00 68,003.00 68,003.00 68,003.00 68,003.00 68,003.00 INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 0.5285159 0.0320738 0.0515717 0.1130879 0.0255058 0.1537530 0.0954920 % OF SYSTEM REVENUE 35,940.67 2,181.11 3,507.03 7,690.32 1,734.47 10,455.67 6,493.74 TOTAL INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 2002 Blaine Centerville Circle Pines Ham Lake Lexington Lino Lakes Spring Lake Park CITY 90,679.00 90,679.00 90,679.00 90,679.00 90,679.00 90,679.00 90,679.00 INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 0.5285159 0.0320738 0.0515717 0.1130879 0.0255058 0.1537530 0.0954920 % OF SYSTEM REVENUE 47,925.29 2,908.42 4,676.47 10,254.70 2,312.84 13,942.17 8,659.12 TOTAL INTERNET FRANCHISE FEES RETAINED BY CITY 2002 Blaine 113,330.00 Centerville 113,330.00 Circle Pines 113,330.00 Ham Lake 113,330.00 Lexington 113,330.00 Lino Lakes 113,330.00 Spring Lake Park 113,330.00 0.5285159 0.0320738 0.0515717 0.1130879 0.0255058 0.1537530 0.0954920 -32- 59,896.71 3,634.92 5,844.62 12,816.25 2,890.57 17,424.83 10,822.11 • AGENDA ITEM 5 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and CJN Investments, LLP (Twin City Fab, Inc.) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: This development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to Twin City Fab for the construction of a 19,200 square foot facility on 4 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center (see attached map). The total minimum market value (MMV) of the completed project will be $920,500, with an estimated tax of $41,041. In this agreement, the city agrees to provide tax increment financing totaling • $77,185, which amounts to approximately 8% of the MMV. The agreement removes the assessments of $70,185 upfront, plus a $5,000 escrow, which will be returned to the company when the building is complete. The remaining pay - as- you -go TIF amount of $2,000 will be used to assist with maintenance of the native landscaping on the site. The city will be reimbursed first for the assessments and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated payback is in July 2005. This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($8,749). It is the city's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. The business subsidy proposed for Twin City Fab, Inc. is under $100,000, and therefore does not require a public hearing under the Minnesota Business Subsidy Law. However, all subsidies of more than $25,000 require a business subsidy agreement, which is now included in the development agreements between the developer and the EDA. Twin City Fab has agreed to a wage and job goal of at least 5 new employees at a minimum starting wage of $11 /hour, plus benefits. • OPTIONS: 1. Approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and CJN Investments, LLP 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • (c) The construction of the Minimum Improvements shall be deemed to be completed when such Minimum Improvements are substantially completed by certification of the architect of record. The Minimum Improvements will be deemed to be substantially completed when the Minimum Improvements have received a certificate of occupancy from the City's building official. Section 4.4. Reconstruction of Minimum Improvements. If the Minimum Improvements are damaged or destroyed before or after completion thereof but before the Termination Date, the Developer agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements so that the Minimum Improvements and the Property have a value at least equal to the Minimum Market Value. The Minimum Improvements shall be reconstructed in accordance with the Construction Plans, or such modifications thereto as may be requested by the Developer and approved by the Authority and the City. Section 4.5. Property Taxes; Special Assessments. After closing, the Developer agrees to pay all ad valorem taxes and special assessments on the Minimum Improvements and the Property as they become due. The Developer shall not cause the Property to be removed from the public tax rolls or to become exempt from assessment for general real estate taxes by reason of any conveyance, lease, abatement or other action prior to the Temlination Date. ARTICLE V Public Assistance Section 5.1. Special Assessments. The City has levied or will levy Special Assessments against the Property in the principal amount of $70,185 for the Public Improvements which have been constructed and which benefit the Property. The Authority agrees to arrange with the City for the satisfaction of the Special Assessments against the Property at the time of issuance of a Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements by paying the Special Assessments at that time in full or by arranging with the City for a schedule of payments, including principal and interest, at a rate of 8 percent per annum. Section 5.2. Administrative Fee. The Developer has paid the Authority the Administrative Fee in the amount of $5,000 to partially cover the Authority's expenses in negotiating this Agreement and other costs associated with the project. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the Administrative Fee upon issuance of the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements. Section 5.3. Native Landscaping. The City has requested the Developer to install native landscaping on the Property after completion of the Minimum Improvements. Native landscaping requires a degree of maintenance while the plantings become established which is greater than more traditional landscaping. Maintenance of native landscaping is generally provided by persons familiar with the environmental and ecological demands of such vegetation. If the Developer installs native vegetation on the Property, the Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the cost of maintaining the vegetation in an amount not to exceed $2,000; provided, however, that the Developer by the time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy must provide a copy of an executed agreement between the Developer and an individual or firm experienced in maintenance of RHB- 183373v1 8 LN140 -73 native vegetation for a minimum of three years after issuance of the Certificate of Completion or installation of the native vegetation, whichever occurs last. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the additional cost of maintaining the native vegetation out of tax increment received from the Minimum Improvements after first reimbursing itself for the Administrative Fee but before payment of the Special Assessments. ARTICLE VI Insurance Section 6.1. Insurance. (a) The Developer agrees to provide and maintain at all times during the process of constructing the Minimum Improvements and, from time to time at the request of the Authority, furnish the Authority with proof of payment of premiums on: (i) Builder's risk insurance, written on the so -called `Builder's Risk -- Completed Value Basis," in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100 %) of the insurable value of the Minimum Improvements at the date of completion, and with coverage available in nonreporting form on the so called "all risk" form of policy; (ii) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner's Contractor's Policy with limits against bodily injury and property damage of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be used); and (iii) Worker's compensation insurance, with statutory coverage. The policies of insurance required pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above shall be in form and content satisfactory to the Authority and shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in Minnesota. The policy of insurance delivered pursuant to clause (i) above shall contain an agreement of the insurer to give not less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the Authority in the event of cancellation of such policy or change affecting the coverage thereunder. (b) Upon completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements and prior to the Termination Date, the Developer shall maintain, or cause to be maintained, at its cost and expense, and from time to time at the request of the Authority shall furnish proof to the Authority of the payment of premiums on, insurance as follows: (i) Insurance against loss and/or damage to the Minimum Improvements under a policy or policies covering such risks as are ordinarily insured against by similar businesses, including (without limiting the generality of the foregoing) fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief, heating system explosion, water damage, demolition cost, debris removal, collapse and flood, in an amount not less than the full insurable replacement value of the Minimum Improvements. No policy of insurance shall be so written that the proceeds thereof will produce less than the minimum coverage required by the preceding sentence, by reason of coinsurance provisions or otherwise, RHB- 183373v1 LN140 -73 9 • ARTICLE X Business Subsidy Act Requirements Section 10.1. Compliance with Business Subsidy Provisions. The parties agree and represent to each other as follows: (a) The subsidy provided to the Developer pursuant to this Agreement consists of the assumption of the Special Assessments in the principal amount of $70,185 and the Native Vegetation Maintenance Grant of $2,000, if the Developer installs native vegetation. The Development Property is located within the Authority's TIF District No. 1 -9, an economic development district. (b) The public purposes of the subsidy are to promote development of a site within the City's industrial park, make fuller use of existing public infrastructure which is currently under- utilized, generate spin -off development within the community, increase jobs in the City and the State, and increase the tax base of the City and the State. (c) The goals for the subsidy are to secure construction of the Minimum Improvements on the Property; to maintain the Minimum Improvements as a manufacturing facility for at least five years as described in clause (f) below; and to create the jobs and wage levels in accordance with Section 10.2 of this Agreement. (d) If the goals described in clause (c) above are not met, the Developer must make the payments to the Authority described in Section 10.3 of this Agreement. (e) The subsidy is needed because the cost of acquiring the Property at fair market value plus the cost of the Special Assessments make development of the site financially infeasible without public assistance. (f) The Developer must continue operation of the Minimum Improvements as a manufacturing facility for at least five years after the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion. (g) The Developer does not have a parent corporation. (h) The Developer has not received, and does not expect to receive financial assistance from any other grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act in connection with purchase of the Property or construction of the Minimum Improvements. (i) For purposes of this Article X, the Developer includes any party to whom the Developer leases the Property or Minimum Improvements. Section 10.2. Job and Wage Goals. Within two years after the earlier of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Developer occupies the Property (the "Compliance Date "), the Developer shall cause to be created at least sth— new full-time RHB- 183373v1 15 LN140 -73 • • equivalent jobs on the Property, and shall cause the wages for the new employees to be no less than $ / / `�`' per hour, exclusive of benefits. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the wage and job goals described in this Section 10.2 are met by the Compliance Date, those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations under Sections 10.1(f) and 10.4. The Authority may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, provided that nothing in this Section 10.2 will be construed to limit the Authority's legislative discretion regarding this matter. Section 10.3. Remedies. If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section 10.1(c), the Developer shall repay the Authority a pro rata share of the amount of the subsidy granted by this Agreement, plus interest on said amount at the implicit price deflator as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50, subd. 2, accrued from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion to the date of payment. The repayment shall be made by the Developer within one year of written demand by the Authority. The term pro rata share means percentages calculated as follows: (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the manufacturing facility in accordance with Section 10.1(f), 60 less the number of months of operation as a manufacturing facility (where any month in which the facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the date of the Certificate of Completion ending with the date the facility ceases operation as determined by the Authority, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100 %. Nothing in this Section 10.3 shall be construed to limit the Authority's remedies under Article IX hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section 10.3 and any other remedy available to the Authority for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 10.1(c), the Developer agrees and understands that its may not a receive a business subsidy from the Authority or any grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act for a period of five years from the date of the failure or until the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section 10.3, whichever occurs first. Section 10.4. Reports. The Developer must submit to the Authority a written report regarding business subsidy goals and results by no later than March 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2001 and continuing until the later of (i) the date the goals stated Section 10.1(c) are met; (ii) 30 days after expiration of the five -year period described in Section 10.1(f); or (iii) if the goals are not met, the date the subsidy is repaid in accordance with Section 10.3. The report must comply with Section 1167.994, subdivision 7 of the Business Subsidy Act. The Authority will provide information to the Developer regarding the required forms. If the Developer fails to timely file any report required under this Section 10.4, the Authority will mail the Developer a warning within one week after the required filing date. If, after 14 days of the postmarked date of the warning, the RHB- 183373v1 16 LN140 -73 a 1- 6t C.: AVMHD:H NNM:11 31111S Lij w I Z 3` a I c0i 1' J I o Z Q _ J I I - 3 14 1-1 I- I m I z w 6.4 m — "3f1N3AY— H1H1164 - 0 tt z o oJK 4 4 =W0 =FU U J NTT• N O Obi!' ® ®V1 N -J z a 0 AS313h3O r HS3SO/' 1NIYS N379 W 0 to 0 0 0 mii 0 I'n 'a- n 0 N a 111'106— co N N 1- 0 W 0 �Q ri-:4-:".,Nsin Oz, M ^ • 1 c:, Q 2 puma .0 Q 0 0 0 3 Jo-unQ 0 311N31W to N. N 0 N AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Milo Bennett, Fire Chief MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: Open Burning Ordinance (Second Reading) VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority Background: It has been many years since the Open Burning ordinance has been updated in Lino Lakes. The proposed ordinance attached replaces the present ordinance and goes into more detail and definition than the present ordinance. Items such as the burning of leaves or grass clippings are still prohibited under the new ordinance. It also has a time of day limitation for recreational fires. These fires can only exist after 11:00 a.m. and before 3:00 a.m. There is provision in this ordinance for a fee for a burning permit. The actual fee to be set by City Council resolution. The ordinance that is being proposed has been adopted by both Centerville and Circle Pines. Options: 1. Approve the ordinance. 2. Reject the proposed ordinance. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Centennial Fire District, that you approve this ordinance. • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved for its adoption. City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka State of Minnesota Ordinance No. 11 -00 An ordinance amending the Lino Lake City Code by repealing chapter 505 Open Burning and replacing it with the following: 505 Open Burning 505.01 Purpose The purpose of this section is to establish permitted categories of Open burning events within the City of Lino Lakes and provide for a permitting process for open burning, except when such open burning is defined as a Recreational Fire as defined in this section. 505.02 Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, the terms in this section are defined as follows: Subd. 1 Open Burning. "Open Burning" means the burning of any matter if the resultant combustion products are emitted directly to the atmosphere without passing through a stack, duct or chimney, except a Recreational fire as defined herein. Subd. 2 Recreational Fire. "Recreational Fire" means a fire set with approved starter fluid no more than three (3) feet in height, contained within the border of a "Recreational Fire Site" using dry, clean wood; producing little detectable smoke, odor or soot beyond the property line; conducted with an adult tending the fire at all times; for recreational, ceremonial, food preparation or social purposes; extinguished completely before quitting the occasion; and respecting weather conditions, neighbors, burning bans, and air quality so that nuisance, health or safety hazards will not be created. Mobile cooking devices such as manufactured hibachis, charcoal grills, wood smokers and propane gas devices are not defined as recreational fires. Recreational fires can only burn between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. and no more than one recreational fire is allowed on any property at one time. Subd. 3 Recreational Fire Site. "A Recreational Fire Site" means an area of no more than three (3) foot diameter circle (measured from the inside of the fire ring or border completely surrounded by non- combustible and non -smoke or odor - producing material either of natural rock, cement, brick, tile or blocks or ferrous metal only and which area is depressed below ground, on the ground or on a raised bed. Included are permanent outdoor woodburning fireplaces. Burning barrels are not a Recreational Fire Site as defined herein. Recreational Fire Sites shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any structure. Subd. 4 Starter Fuels. "Starter Fuels" means dry, untreated and unpainted kindling, branches or cardboard, or charcoal fire starter. Paraffin candles and alcohols are permitted as starter fuels and as aids to ignition only. Propane gas torches or other clean gas- burning devices causing minimal pollution must be used to start an Open Burn. Subd. 5 Wood. "Wood" means dry, clean fuel such as twigs, branches, limbs "presto logs ", charcoal, cord wood or untreated dimensional lumber. "Wood" does not include wood that is green, with leaves or needles, rotten, wet oil soaked or treated with preservatives. Clean pallets may be used for recreational fires when cut into three (3) foot lengths. Subd. 6 Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and Assistant Fire Marshals are the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and Assistant Fire Marshals of the Centennial Fire District, who have been appointed as fire wardens by the Commissioner of Natural Resources for Minnesota. 505.03 Prohibited Materials. No person shall conduct, cause or permit any of the following material: Subd. 1 Oils, petro fuels, rubber, plastics, chemically treated materials or other materials which produce excessive or noxious smoke such as tires, railroad ties, treated, painted or glued wood composite shingles, tar paper, insulation, composition board, sheetrock, wiring, paint or paint filters. Subd. 2 Hazardous waste or salvage operations, or open burning of solid waste generated from an industrial or manufacturing process or from a service or commercial establishment or building material generated from demolition or commercial or institutional structures. • Subd. 3 Discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, storage, preparation, serving or consumption of food. Subd. 4 Leaves or grass clippings. • • 505.04 Statue Adopted by Reference. Minnesota Statutes Sections 88.16 through 88.22 are hereby incorporated by reference in this Section 505 as if fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between this Section 505 and said sections of Minnesota Statutes, the provision that places the greater restrictions or the higher standard shall apply. 505.05 Open Burning Permits. Subd. 1 Permits Required. No person shall start or allow any open burning anywhere within the City without first having obtained a permit, except that a permit is not required for any fire which is a Recreational Fire as defined herein. Subd. 2 Purposes Allowed for Open Burning. Open burn permits may be issued only for the following purposes: (a) Elimination of fire or health hazard that cannot be abated by other practical means. (b) Ground thawing for utility repair and construction. (c) Disposal of vegetative matter for managing forest, prairie or wildlife habitat, and in the development and maintenance of land and rights -of -way where chipping, composting, landspreading or other alternative methods are not practical. (d) Disposal of diseased trees generated on site, diseased or infected nursery stock, or diseased bee hives. (e) Disposal of unpainted, untreated, non -glued lumber and wood shakes generated from construction, where recycling, reuse, removal or other alternative disposal methods are not practical. Subd. 3 Permit Application for Open Burning and Permit Fees. (a) Open Burning permits shall be obtained by making application on a form prescribed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and adopted by the Centennial Fire District. The permit application shall be presented to the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal or an Assistant Fire Marshal. Each application shall be accompanied by a fee, as set annually by City Council resolution. • (b) • Upon receipt of the completed Open Burning permit application and permit fee, the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal or Assistant Fire Marshal may schedule a preliminary site inspection to locate the proposed burn site, note special conditions, set dates and times of permitted burn and review fire safety considerations. The official reviewing the application shall also develop a burn event safety plan for the requested burn. (c) If established criteria for the issuance of an open burning permit are not met, or, during review of said application, it is determined that a practical alternative method for disposal of the material exists, or a pollution or nuisance condition would result, or if a burn event safety plan cannot be drafted to the satisfaction of the official reviewing the application, the official may deny the application for the open burn permit. Subd. 4 Permit Holder Responsibility. (a) Prior to starting an Open Burn, the permit holder shall be responsible for confirming that no burning ban or air quality alert is in effect. Every Open Burn event shall be constantly attended by the permit holder. The Open Burn site shall have available, appropriate communication and fire suppression equipment as set out in the burn event safety plan. (b) The Open Burn shall be completely extinguished before the permit holder leaves the site. No fire may be allowed to smolder with no flame present. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to have a valid permit, as required by this section, available for inspection on the site. (c) The permit holder is responsible for the compliance and implementation of all general conditions, special conditions, and the burn event safety plan as established in the permit issued. The permit holder shall be responsible for all costs incurred as a result of the burn, including, but not limited to, fire suppression and administrative fees. • Subd. 5 Revocation of Open Burning Permit. The Open Burning Permit is subject to revocation at the discretion of a DNR forest officer, or the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal, or Assistant Fire Marshal. Reasons for revocation include, but are not limited to: A fire hazard existing or developing during the course of the burn, any of the conditions of the permit being violated during the course of the burn, pollution or nuisance conditions developing during the course of the burn, or a fire smoldering with no flame present. 505.06 Burning Ban or Air Quality Alert. No Recreational Fire or Open Burn will be permitted when the City or DNR has officially declared a burning ban due to potential hazardous fire conditions or when the MPCA has declared an Air Quality Alert. 505.07 Violation. Any violation of the provisions of this Section 505, or of the terms of any permit issued pursuant to this section, shall be a misdemeanor. Each day a violation exists shall be a separate violation. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council, this day of , 20 Mayor Attest: Clerk Published in on the day of , 20 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: Background: AGENDA ITEM 6B Milo Bennett, Fire Chief August 14, 2000 Ordinance adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. (Second Reading) Simple Majority Every 3 to 4 years, the state of Minnesota adopts an updated Uniform Fire Code. When the state adopts this code, it becomes the fire code to be used throughout the state. By adopting this same code, it gives the local fire inspectors the authority to enforce the code when doing their inspections. This has proven to be very beneficial in reducing the fire losses and the adoption of this code is a standard practice in a large number of communities. Options: Approve the ordinance, which allows Centennial Fire District to continue the fire prevention efforts. Reject the ordinance and turn control of the Fire Code enforcement back to the state. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Centennial Fire District, that you approve this ordinance. We believe this is a critical item when it comes to citizen safety and fire loss reduction. • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved for its adoption. City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka State of Minnesota Ordinance No. 12 -00 An ordinance amending the Lino Lakes City Code by repealing chapter 1002 Fire Code and replacing it with the following: 1002 Fire Code 1002.01 Uniform Fire Code Adoption The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, as adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 299F.011, is hereby adopted as the fire code for the City of Lino Lakes for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life or property from fire, hazardous material, or explosion. The provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code except as modified or amended by this ordinance, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance as set forth herein. One copy of this code shall be marked as the official copy and shall be on file in the office of the Fire Chief. 1002.02 Enforcement (a) The Chief of the Centennial Fire District serving Lino Lakes or the Chief's representatives are authorized to administer and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. (b) The Chief of the Centennial Fire District may detail such members of the fire department as may be necessary to administer and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. 1002.03 Definitions (a) Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, it shall mean the City of Lino Lakes. (b) Whenever the term "this code" is used in the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code or this ordinance, it shall mean the code adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. • (c) Whenever the term "Fire Department" is used, it shall mean the Centennial Fire • • District. 1002.04 Appeals Pursuant to Minnesota Statue 299F.011, subd. 5a, a board of appeals is hereby established for the City of Lino Lakes The board of appeals shall consist of the Mayor, the Building Official, the City Administrator and shall include the chief of the fire department of the chief's designated representative who shall serve as an exofficio member. The board of appeals shall consider issues related to disapproval of an application or permit issuance, claims, or misapplication or misinterpretation of the code, or requests for variances from orders issued under this code. Requests for appeals shall be made within 30 days of the date of decision of the chief or issuance of orders. 1002.05 Penalties (a) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this code, or builds in violation of any certificate or permit issued under this code, or builds in violation of plans or detailed statement of specifications submitted and approved under this code, or violated any order made pursuant to this code, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to timely comply with an order affirmed or modified by the Lino Lakes Board of Appeals as defined in section 1002.04 or by a court of competent jurisdiction, for each violation shall severally be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and /or by imprisonment as set forth in other regulations of this jurisdiction. The imposition of one penalty for any violation or permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. (b) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. 1002.06 Validity The Lino Lakes City Council hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance or code herein adopted be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Lino Lakes City Council that they would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of any such section as may be declared invalid. • Effective Date This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council, this day of , 20 Mayor Attest: Clerk Published in on the day of , 20 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE August 14, 2000 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND Consideration of Resolution No 2000 - 75 Accepting Donation from the Centennial Fire District to defer costs to purchase three sets of Tire Deflation Devices Simple Majority The Centennial Fire District has graciously donated $1,332.00 to offset the cost to match funds for a grant to purchase a total of six Tire Deflation Devices. The Lino Lakes Police Department received a grant to purchase three sets of Tire Deflation devices. Part of the grant requirement is to provide matching funds. Centennial Fire District is aware of this goal and has donated $1,332.00 for the cost of the matching funds. The purpose of Resolution 2000 -75is to accept and publicly thank the Centennial Fire District for their generous donation. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2000 - 75accepting the donation. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO.2000- 75 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CENTENNIAL FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION FOR THREE (3) SETS OF TIRE DEFLATION DEVICES WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Police Department is currently operating without a tire deflation system to aid in the stopping of pursuits; WHEREAS, Lino Lakes is a thirty -three square mile city which has several main traffic arteries running through it including I35W and I35E, which are commonly used by fleeing suspects; WHEREAS, in the past, officers have frequently been in position where a tire deflation device could have been implemented to aid in stopping or slowing the suspect vehicle, therefore lessening risk to public safety; WHEREAS, funding for a total of six sets of tire deflation devices to equip duty squad cars was not part of the 2000 Department of Public Safety budget item; WHEREAS, a grant was written and was accepted by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Drug Policy and Violence Prevention Tire Deflators Grant program. The grant allows the Lino Lakes Police Department to purchase three sets of tire deflation devices, two hours of classroom instruction and two hours of practical use with a set of training spikes. The Lino Lakes Police Department is required to provide matching funds; WHEREAS, the Centennial Fire Relief Association has made a donation in the amount of $1332.00 to the City of Lino Lakes for the cost of three (3) sets of tire deflation devices which meets our matching funds requirement; and WHEREAS, the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following manner: Increase Revenue - Contributions $1332.00 Increase Expenditures - Police Uniforms $1332.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $1332.00 for the cost of three tire deflation devices and wishes to express its gratitude to the Centennial Fire Relief Association for its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of August, 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad /AMC, City Clerk - Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • 051 L 5 0 0.►► AGENDA ITEM 8A STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1St and 2nd Additions VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The Public Hearing for this item is continued from the July 24, 2000, City Council meeting. Many residents made statements and asked questions about the proposed assessment amounts, the Public Improvement process (Statute 429), and the City Charter. Specific information from the City Attorney and Charter Commission was requested in order to clarify the 60 -day waiting period status. City staff has received and attached opinions from both the City Attorney and the Chair of the Charter Commission regarding this issue. A resident also indicated he had contacted the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and received assurance there were funds available for this type of project. City staff again contacted both of these agencies and the Minnesota Department of Health regarding grant funding availability specifically to help pay assessments for connection to City utilities. We were unable to identify alternative funding sources. Many of the funding sources relate to replacement of on -site systems, low interest loans, or have income restrictions. The first meeting of the Twilight Acres Work Group regarding the septic systems was held Thursday evening, August 10 with several residents, the City Administrator and myself attending. The group specifically asked that the following issues be considered: 1. Another survey to determine the level of the resident's willingness to pay for this project. 2. Placing the project on the ballot this Fall for consideration. 3. Making a specific funding request to an agency other than the City. 4. Modifying the project to include alternative means of providing utility service. City staff will need time to investigate these issues and report to the City Council. We recommend continuing the public hearing at least until the August 28, 2000 meeting. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the Public Hearing to the August 28, 2000 City Council meeting. 2. Do not adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. 3. Adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 — Continue the Public Hearing for Adoption of the Assessments for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2 "d Addition project to the August 28, 2000 City Council meeting. 08/08/00 11:27 LRW OFF 1 Ct5 X1410 4 I H Hut * bbl =se 4477 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS AND ASSOCIATES 2140 Fourth Avenue North Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Bus. (763) 427 -8877 Fax (763) 421 -4213 IVU. YJH ( VU1 I'ELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2000 TO: Linda Waite Smith FIRM: City of Lino Lakes FAX #: (651) 982 -2499 FROM Bill Hawkins RE: Twilight Acres Special Assessment Procedure TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 3 For distribution. 16u /1d /1610 11: G'( LHW Urr 1 Ltb 21416 4 1 h HVt -* bbl =se e477 NU.164( 1, LAW OFFICES of William G. Hawkins and Associates 2140 EouRTH AVENUE Noma l:cgatnsstaiuni ANOKA. MJNNESOTA 55303 WILLIAM G. HAWKJNS TAMMI J. UVEGES PHONE (763) 21-42 77 BARRY A. SULLIVAN FAX (763) 421 -4213 E-MAIL HawkLaw l @ aol.com August 8, 2000 The Honorable Mayor John Bergeson and Members of the Lino Lakes City Council Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Twilight Acres Special Assessment Procedure Dear Mayor Bergeson and Members of the City Council: This letter is in response to your request for our opinion regarding the ability of property owners in the Twilight Acres developments to petition against the improvement projects that are being contemplated for this area. Section 8.04 of the City Charter sets out the petitioning procedure. This section provides that all local improvements to be paid for by special assessments are instituted either by (a) petition of at least 25% of the benefited properties; or (b) a resolution adopted by 4/5 affirmative vote of the Council. The Charter then provides that the City must adopt a resolution stating the nature and scope of the proposed improvements including the number of benefited property owners and shall provide a means to obtain cost estimates which shall set forth the costs of the improvements both in unit prices and in total thereof. This is the resolution the City adopts asking the engineer to prepare a feasibility report. The Charter further goes on to state that upon receipt of such estimate the Council shall set by resolution a date for a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing including the estimated unit price and estimated total price thereof shall be mailed to each benefited property owner at least two weeks prior to the date of the hearing. Failure to give mailed notice, or any defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. The City Council began the local improvement process for the Twilight Acres subdivisions, received the feasibility report from the City Engineer and held a public hearing on November 22, 1999. The Charter further states that at the hearing the Council shall present an assessment formula and an analysis of the assessment income expected to offset the proposed improvement. This information was provided at this public hearing by City Engineer John Powell. The Charter provides that the 08/08/00 11:2Y LHW UFF 1 Lt`J 14F0 '41M Hut -' bit 7oc G'r77 Mayor and Council Members August 8, 2000 - Page 2 ivu. u� r vc.J,J City can take no further action for a period of 60 days after this public hearing on the proposed improvement. Within such 60 days the Charter prohibits the City Council from making the improvement if a petition is signed and filed by a majority of the property owners proposed to be assessed. If the improvement has been instituted by petition of property owners, a petition stopping the project can be signed by the same number of persons who signed the original initiating petition. The Council can only make the improvement if there is filed with the Council a petition asking that the improvement be made signed by the property owners proposed to be assessed in a number at least equal to those who signed the petition against the improvement. Subd. 3 of Section 8.04 provides that the Council may by resolution at any time between the 60 days and one year after the conclusion of the public hearing proceed on the improvement if there is no petition prohibiting same. In the Twilight Acres 114 and 2nd improvement process there was no petition filed S within 60 days after the initial public hearing held on November 22. Therefore, the time period for property owners to prohibit the project has expired. The City Council is free to order the project at this time if it so desires. The public hear�g t the City Council is currentl holdin i the s • - . essment hearin • . This is a separate and distinct hearing that is conducted solely for the purpose of levying the special assessments against the property. There are no provisions to petition against the assessment or "opt out" of the project after this public hearing. The only remedy for property owners would be to appeal the assessment to district court for review. In conclusion the decision of whether or not to proceed with the project rests solely with the Council. The residents at this time have no ability to opt out of the project or petition against the project under the provisions of the Charter. If any Council members have any further questions, please contact me. • ncerely, illiam G. Hawkins WGH/tju • To: Linda Waite Smith Lino Lakes City Administrator From: John Sullivan Lino Lakes Charter Commission Chair 2 August 2000 Linda — Attached is an Email from Mr. Duke Addicks, LMC. Please distribute to Council members. As Charter Chair, you will see that I took your questions and applied them to the Charter. I then formulated my opinion and presented my interpretation to Mr. Addicks. You will see he confirmed my interpretation as accurate. If I can provide additional assistance in this matter, please contact me. • 11 .1111 • . 11 .11 . .. 1111.11. e..i • n" r.n -2 n gnu Duke - Need your help again! The Lino Lakes City Council has asked for a Charter Commission opinion regarding Section 8 of the City Charter. During a public hearing on assessment rolls there was confusion about the period of time during which property owners can petition out of the process. Speakers at the public hearing questioned whether the sixty day period for petitioning out of the project could have begun last November or even this June, before council had received all the information needed to make a decision, i.e. the estimated costs and the appraisals of affected properties. The following is my opinion, please respond back as to your belief of its accuracy. Section 8.04 provides a step by step process which needs to followed. The first step is that the Council adopts a resolution to provide means to obtain a cost estimate. Once the estimate is received, the Council sets the public hearing date. After the public hearing has concluded, a period of sixty days shall elapse before any action can be taken. If during the sixty day period a majority petition is received against the improvement (as is the case in this proposed situation), the council shall not be able to make the improvement at the expense of the property owner. The question here is whether the petitioning could have started early (prior to cost estimates and the public hearing). I believe the answer is no. I think that as the Charter is a legal document, actions must be followed step by step. In this case, a petition received last November or this June is before the public hearing. I believe that once the Public Hearing date is set, it "starts the clock" on the process. The process allows for submission of a petition during the sixty period, not before. Additionally, I would be surprised if a citizen would submit a petition either for or against the improvement without knowing the cost estimate. I would appreciate you opinion back! As always, thanks for your assistance. John Sullivan Charter Commission Chair (651) 784 -3511 John, I agree with you. The 60 day period during which a petition may be received starts after the public hearing. Does your city attorney agree? The city attorney would be the one to advise the council on this matter. Duke •d 7n77_O7o,rco� LIfl 1 TUW D7no em1.:Rn nn 7n °gnu • • AGENDA ITEM 8B STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utility Improvements (To Be Continued to August 28, 2000) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required to Continue BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2000, the City Council received the feasibility report for this project and set a date for a Public Hearing. In order to allow additional time for discussion of the project schedule with the developer of Bluebill Ponds and notification, we recommend the hearing be continued to August 28, 2000. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Continue the public hearing to August 28, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends continuing the public hearing. • • AGENDA ITEM 8C STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 13 -00, Vacating the Elmcrest Avenue right -of -way from 400 feet south of Main Street to Cedar Street. VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND: The developer of the Wenzel Farm project in the City of Hugo has requested the vacation of the City of Lino Lakes' portion of the Elmcrest Avenue right -of -way. This roadway is also known as 24th Avenue and Tart Lake Road. The purpose of the vacation is to allow the developer to incorporate this area into their landscaping and trail plan and provide a buffer between the residential development in Hugo and the commercial development in Lino Lakes. The only access of concern to Lino Lakes in the proposed vacation area is the Construction Laborer's Training Facility driveway. For this reason, the vacation begins 400 feet south of Main Street, and south of the driveway. City staff has determined that the use of this area for a roadway is not needed for public purposes, however, we do need to retain a drainage and utility easement over the vacated area. Section 12.05 of the City Charter requires that real property of the City cannot be disposed of except by Ordinance. The Ordinance will require two readings, publication, and a waiting period before it is in effect. The publication will not occur until the replacement north /south roadway has been constructed in Hugo. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 13 -00. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. • • • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 13 -00 CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE ELMCREST AVENUE RIGHT -OF -WAY FROM 400 FEET SOUTH OF MAIN STREET TO CEDAR STREET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. That it is in the best interest of the City to vacate the 33 foot wide right -of- way immediately adjacent to the City's corporate limits from 400 feet south of Main Street (CSAH 14) to Cedar Street with the City of Lino Lakes retaining a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over said vacated right -of -way Section 3. That the City of Lino Lakes held a Public Hearing before the City Council on August 14, 2000 and September 11, 2000. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of September, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing Ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on September 11, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk _ 6 n NoeM in W /LLOW // E _V GLEN- - 3 ... s e4O L9 - III2N.',I 6L *IEAUO A -- COUNTY — STATE— A10 — N10MWA I MOUSTR /AI L z L7• I s l 6 PARK — 1 In AM - — 'TFEET- PPE PS Fatillairq a©iD BVMM gagriii ....Ad= iir ITY OF CENTERVILLE ITY OF LINO LAKES / O 25 36 oV rLo r4-4- FS OHM ,44 4.11I 0, n 6, LAKE • AGENDA ITEM 8D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Marmon Keystone Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority held a public hearing regarding a proposed $322,242 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing to Marmon /Keystone for the construction of an 83,000 square foot facility in the Apollo Business Center. A new state statute requires that a public entity —in this case the EDA —must find that the granting of a subsidy meets the best interests of the city. As required by state statute, the city council is required to also approve the subsidy. This subsidy is to write down a portion of the cost of land and assessments on the project according to the terms of a development agreement. The development agreement includes the Subsidy Agreement, specifying the requirements under the Business Subsidy Law, including wage and job goals and annual reporting. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the business subsidy for Marmon /Keystone 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • AGENDA ITEM 8E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 8/14/00 TOPIC: Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Twin City Fab, Inc. Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority considered a proposed $77,185 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing to Twin City Fab, Inc. for the construction of a 19,200 square foot facility in the Apollo Business Center. As with the previous agenda item, state statute requires that a public entity —in this case the EDA —must find that the granting of a subsidy meets the best interests of the city. The city council is required to also approve the subsidy. The main component of this subsidy is to write down the cost of assessments. The development agreement includes the Subsidy Agreement, specifying the requirements under the Business Subsidy Law, including wage and job goals and annual reporting. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Business Subsidy Agreement for Twin City Fab, Inc. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 AGENDA ITEM 8 F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: Town Center Development Standards Endorsement CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The Planning & Zoning Board opened the public hearing on the new Town Center Development standards in April. We kept it open to allow extensive discussion and public input. The Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) met on August 3 for further discussion of the proposed standards and voted on a recommendation. P & Z closed the hearing August 9. The public hearing and discussion has been for educational purposes: to educate the public about the City's intent to create the new zoning district and standards, and to educate City staff and officials on what developers, land owners, and others think about the draft standards. We have not yet begun the formal process for amending the zoning ordinance and rezoning the Town Center area. The City has applied for additional grant money from the Metropolitan Council under the Livable Communities program. We received a grant in 1998 to plan our Town Center. We have applied for additional money to help implement the plan. The Met Council has let us know that the development standards are important to show the City is serious about implementing the mixed use, compact development plan. While we have yet to process the formal zoning amendment that is needed to officially adopt any new zoning district or standards, we need to show substantial progress. EDAC voted to adopt a statement indicating support for the standards. The P & Z voted 6 -0 to adopt the statement with two minor changes, which are underlined. Endorse the preliminary and draft Town Center standards as recommended by staff with the understanding that the City may revise specific language and requirements in the standards. (The signage standards (section 3.8) will be temporarily pulled from the standards for further review.) Revisions would occur as part of the process for amending the City's zoning ordinance to include standards for a new Town Center zoning district. As noted above, we will have to process the Town Center standards as an amendment to the zoning ordinance. There will be two elements to this zoning amendment: Town Center Standards August 14, 2000 page 2 • One element is the rezoning of the Town Center area. Our intent has been to rezone the areas currently zoned SC Shopping Center and LB Limited Business. (A rezoning is an amendment to the zoning ordinance, because the zoning map is part of the ordinance.) • The other element is the development standards for the new district. Every zoning district has its own subsection in the zoning ordinance that lists the standards for that district. The Town Center standards we've been discussing will be the subsection for the Town Center zoning district. State statute as well as our zoning ordinance regulate how to process a zoning amendment. Approval of a zoning amendment requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council. The two earliest possible schedules are listed below. Staff intends to schedule the hearing for the September P & Z meeting. We plan to finish refining the Town Center standards in time for that meeting. latest date to send notice to newspaper August 23 September 20 mail notice to property owners flexible flexible notice published in paper August 29 September 26 public hearing at P & Z September 13 October 11 City Council action September 25 October 23 OPTIONS 1. Adopt the statement of endorsement listed above. 2. Do not adopt the statement of endorsement. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • • • AGENDA ITEM 8 G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: August 14, 2000 TOPIC: Final Plat, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition (revised) CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the final plat for Clearwater Creek 4th Addition on July 24. This is a revision to that final plat. The revision is necessary because of the grade elevations on one lot where an existing home sits. With the creation of new lots, the driveway location must change for this existing house. This change in driveway location necessitates a change to the lot line. This in turn requires moving the lot lines for five other lots. This situation affects Lots 1 -6, Block 3. The attached drawings show those lots on the July 24 plat, the revised August 8 plat, and a comparison of the two. The table below lists the Changes. Lot number lot width July 24 final plat lot width, revised August 8 final plat change 5 78.90 75.23 -3.67 4 75.00 75.00 0 3 75.00 75.00 0 2 119.00 85.00 -34.00 lot depth lot depth 1 153.00 162.00 +9.00 The project is a planned development overlay, and included variations on the standard minimum lot widths. The final plat approved on July 24 conformed to the approved preliminary plat. On the August revision, the width of Lot 5 decreases slightly. Lot 2 width decreases by 34 feet, but the lot still is wider than the normal minimum 80 ft. for an R -1 lot, and the building area within the setbacks is adequate. The size of the wetland and the drainage easement around it on Lots 1 and 2 has decreased significantly from the July 24 plat. The developer's engineer says that the July 24 plat was inaccurate, but the new August plat shows the correct size of the wetland as it will be after mitigation. To verify this, we asked for a copy of the wetland mitigation plan that was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The submitted information verifies the post- development wetland location shown on the revised final plat (see attached detail from wetland mitigation plan). Revised Clearwater Creek 4th Addn. August 14, 2000 page 2 As on the July 24 final plat, there are three lots in the southeast corner of this e Addition that cross the boundary of the current MUSA. (Lots 14, 15, 16, Block 5.) These lots must be included in the final plat in order to construct the roads and utilities in that vicinity. Until MUSA is available, these lots will not receive building permits. This restriction is included in the development agreement. All aspects of the phasing plan for this development apply to the revised final plat. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • ONV _ J 00'01 -� 1 *g'99 I g s N A1 0 of Of J 00'SOt 3„0t,9t.00N LL (1 Y LLI r� 00V0 00 *g01 1" 3.0t9 LOON 1 .c, . ci S0220'37 -E .) Of 185.57 o I � - - -- GO 7Z6 — ;.)�N H\°° �{ d \ �• 1 tri Of 1 k./.A \ 26 0\ 157. -o � �:\; M t N \‘4)\J A), 1 og'9f 1 X01 ,�L- �'ti.V "� co csi N� ■ ao • Z \ `•4-z• O --- . '3 i�f 5f t 1 h i ._ _�3 "• 0*,91.00N 1 o 1 li- -_' ` 1N3l3SV3 )ll7tln �� 101 $' ONV 39VNIVd0 i �.2 $ �� SZSft r 1 o1 tri .3.01r,9 LOON 1 C J IO I W at5ft J 3 „0 *,91.00N 1 O I M Icy ( WWI J 0 3 «0 *, 91.00N 1 1-C C1s4 1$ Tor .3„01,,9 LOON f9 '0f t 8 - 00 *L91 - LiJ _■••11111.. SR9 °39'53 "E 00.L91 M„OPP.91,O0S ••-•-, 0 6L'f+9 tz'a01 co ., - « v ICJ 1. •., V/♦ 19f • ?-1. 00 r L 7'08 00'901 30VN/b'2J0 00501 J 0 30'.91.00N Of 00 2'08 Ak WI of .21 (nI — J 7.08 r 00'901 c L 00 •901 1 of 00'981 3.0*, 91.00N 1 S0220'37 "E 185.57 tri O S89 43'20 "E Of Of 0 *9991 N Al 0 r 1 0 a:a.. h A r iN I ) Z \ S4"Sf l \�zz�4 O „0t,9L00N ' i r�- Or 1N3W3SY3 A11711n 101 ONV 30YN /Y2/0 -- --- OI 1 o, A 0 1 1 L Ioo I2 I sz•S f (- 3.0 *, 91.00N 1 I 1 of 12 W �i Cn 1^ M 1 1 „�) L S1 •01 1 o' 0 0:n 1- 3.0 *,91.00N 1 O 1 1 oo1 1 L 80•9f'l 0 1 3, 9S, Z1.00N h 00'L91 M «017,91.00S•• J 0 •t /13N /o sun ;s133-, 3„Or, 9 1000N 0NV CO __J r 00''01 )I -1 / / 3 WN/b'210 -• -' -�� O i 00'S01 3.0t,9t.00N 1 U VLF° - - r II 1 I I- 1 1 Lid �I 1� `^1 1 11 . 11 —J L 0 oovot 98t 3.01%91.00N 00 sot `'. ■ 1 50220'37 "E 1 Of • h 1 1 185.57 • Of • • tti N 1 Of 0 tcs91 N A O OS s£1 00'191 i,3.0t'91.00N 11) ion - t f 1/4 1N3W3SV3.UfUf ONV.3OVN /VVJ0 -� —� 1 1$ • 3.0t, 91.00N jiikki* AM" o I Iiki 1 915£'1 I k! L � v„I 3.01r,91.00N -1 rte- +ii I$ o 1 1^ g Of • 1 1 of s£t J tci 3.0 *, 91.00N �1h vJ ofi"' TS6f1 ')Iii ►d • 3.01,91.00N £90£1 1 J • \ • t. 3.9 1.00N --•-- CR O ° TO P S T "r ....: o� .-•1 00'L91 Mn017,91000S'• -� L o awn 0 6L '1,9 E %% 1 1 tf- 14 11 1 1 1 1 rl 1 i ii 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ r 1 \\ \ 1 I 1 1 1 -1 -4 -- t t 1 1 1 t 1 \ 1\ i \ iv vvv \ \ \ \• ` . 4 \ \ `\ \ - \ ri _ J rr 1 7-- It , '`,J, \WETI_ANQ \F,ILL ,.fi00 ( ,.1FT: % 1 1 1 ‘... 1 ! 1 / / / / / / / / / / / // N. \ N. / N. 1 N. N. 1 1 1 fie° 1 / 1 —_,__ __L / _! \ ! \ ( 1 .,,. I" r, r'. / � --' / �� 11 \ /1 1 / —7' / r \ 1 / 1 / r / li /i --� " -��ti�_ \` �\ 111; ; ` \ /// /// / / / /rr 1 1/ /, `\ 1t 1 1 w y/ 3 "`W t / / c / // i it 1 ti,!/ 1 1 /I / 11 / 11 ! \ 1 // 11 /1 / / 11 11 +..t // .� 11 !� // t 7 1 t j/ t1 t1 1 1r 1 / \ 11 1 --./ 1 / / /1 / / 1 ? 1 1 / 1 \ / / / /1 / \ -.1\ \� \ / 1 / �_� 1 / _J t �/ ! / / / 1 ..'...118/11181 / ` \r�,•l,.. \��- •`.c__e- � — 1 1 // / /r -d /! / /' / _ !/ // \ `�' \\� \._ —/1/ 1 i / /_; / / //� • -- -� __ / \ /// /r, /� / / !/ /f \ �. N. rrr \\ `� ! // 1 1 �\ 1 (I / ✓/J - 1 // / / / N. 1i / rr \`� \\ \\J/ i \ 111 1 1 // - / / // /� 4 // //, �\ \ \\ 111 1 1 ✓ / / ♦ \ • \d\ \ 1111 r v,y 1 I 1 / / \ \ \ \\ 1I' \\ r \ ✓ /AII 11 1 I 1 I/ // \ \ \ \ 1 \\ \ 1 1 1 1 1 / \ \. \ \\ • \\ \�\\\ 1 1 \�� 1 1 11 I t II rr "�. \ 1 t \ \ \ \ \ I 1 1 i / \ \ :\\\ \\\,,,„\\ \ \rti \\ 1111 1 ! 1 t 1 1 \ \\ \. . \ \ \ \. \. `. \\ s t [ i 1 1Cr\ S. \ \ �N \ t N / 1 1r ✓\ / / /`\ 1 /✓ \� // 1 \ / 41 /! 1 \ E \ \ \ \\\ \ ♦��. \ \11 1 iT lit 1 1 1 ` 1 1 // d 1 1 / ut /i 1 � I I 11 4. i. / rF ✓ / / rr/ / / // t 1 / / S/ 1 15 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 l \ 1 1 1 1 1 I ( 1 11 11 1t 1 \ 1 el ! 11 / 4 1 i r /J ✓/ t{° /// ✓.'.`t/ \ 11 1 \I '1 t _ 1 1 \ 1 \ \ 1 ti \ i r N. W \ \\ O \ \ \ N. �\ \� \a\ N. \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 Ul Q Y \ 1 /1b / 1 N. \ \ \ . \ \\ \` \`\ h / ^\ ,\ \, / t \ \ \---... / 1 / 1 / 1 i / 1� 1 1 \ r ■ 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 11/ 1 / / /- \\_ ., 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/, //_ \�. Ct, \ti i \ 1 °�' R 1 1 \ \\ fi.. l \ • • • SW Comes of S -MOO f of N. 92206 feet 1. of NEI /4 -SET /4 II�ll .50025- ENN- R11W -s / :. " East Lb* of /.t1. SO °12'55 "Wi 50 / .-NWI/4 -SE1/4 1 / S.c.TS -l31N -1722W r Eost L. of NW1 /4 -SEl /4 � S. 4 " -. ' ? _ _ - _ 1 S.e25 -7.11N-R22W _ _ _ _ 4a J 9 % N0071'S5 E - - - 33200 _ _ _+_1w -� SO0125514 _ _ - _ _ 33200 °i�F9JP'19, .io •9 99 14. ' I `: ' -Wr,t Lino of NE1 /4 -9E1/4 _ - _ _ -i �z_____----_-- 1 r-, ! u2H Sec25 -731N -R22W lei 1N• Rp I i ;gt zg� n}.� 1x.IG a$ t Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. Cn OI I C o S!� 130. 893 I' r , x F.mx g� b INo3 u 4g' agac I' -I _ x$` y;H -0 No" INi •('t ^` O'C♦' .$ '... ' ( 4..4^) cs O 14. \ w L I \ ,i'%- /, . \ t°4\ / /'\ m �\ - \01 / / 15 l' N'\ \ / /lay \° tn\ ✓ • �/ �li / G o\ 4, 1. spy C. •'\a 'O°\ It 4 \ g'::° . / 'G,y 'O "'S / / \ 014 Q '• w \ -J \V .rte / \ '--i\ 2 ♦ X454 y44..- o \\�. �/ 3' ♦ S/ Ih �Q . 056.59/ ; \°a... , �v NI 1' / /�\ 4 °" 04' rn CS.Z£'S0t `. 9• p0, v ` f. ,D\\ , 11/ / \ .n' ■ )p VI ra g°143 •\ r li8 I Y 1 /Yt i.\ �\ \p /o • • o _Lfte,1 £ mw /\ r ,�Z.St .OZ�Q \ ° \''%,,,I, / 04i \ `o. $ ♦♦ 1 ., 7 1' LL _J L 1 \L. \ I ■�__- ;LL6r.els 1, \\ N .a o` 64.79 102.21 0 �I 500 °16'40'W 167.00 `'� � \; ut 1 ;D t- r. co a ♦r° 81 \yy m1= O 4 r - -- .L ...1 ° i v,1.4 92206 \ 352.00 tl '4 +� 258.08 tlIl - 590.08 - - -y - - 3„1-9,6£06.9S 0 r- 1 NO076�40£ �11n -4-- N007265T) 1395i _ w1N -r ut- � �14 1 •0 L N0076'40'E J8 167.00 to L 8 1- 135.10 CoUI to 21 4 ttoo I 6t. 1_ N0076'40 -E J IN r 135.18 1 ,' I I, UI Ca lU 81 I° 6 L L J O f. I ..--.7, DRAINAGE MO I° I ' j unurr EASEMENT -. 1° LPL/ I-. J 1 O 1 (j)0 I N0016 40£� ( ` • LN ` 1 135.34 ,S....-"4.4, \t 'al O 1` 0 I. m ~�4. \t 1\I- lu /8 4'i, aN S1? kJi i4 I' /vv.& la I° 1 Iss/ 18 O 10L )35.50 It T 0 k o rt'., ' • W N 165.54 J0 J JO -0 4 0 ai) \01 0' to Ot'O W a , r 17:; rTl ' 1 -r, rT� , - - � c - • \ - f r I I 1 rrl I I "S" t j g h„qs_ V • 3,Lr.04tOS L N0076'40'E 105.00 1 L J 0 185500 J'6 80.000 0 r L J 0 105.00 80.00 °TART oC0 U RTg 0 I• t�N027445 £ 16326/ 104.97 • 58.29 )ILJJ3 L[J VJI4 ?I VJ73 `DRAINAGE AND 71 UTILITY EASEMENT, 10 ri b • 4 "1 N c. N0076'40 £ 316.86 r 8 l05.00 7;2.5.- DRAINAGE L ' J r 80.00 r 80.00 4 nl U EASEMENT -�-� L -_ - -• v L J p 105.00 0 80.00 0 80.00 j 0 66.49 11 4 ROAD 36/.46 it 100°16'40" ' -toot Lk,. of NE1 /4 -5E7/4 527.00 S...25 -731N -R22W I 'o 8 11 I / - 22608 is b \ -4 Comes of 91.25808 - "rY_ \• Fool of N£I /4 -SE1/4 �+ Sec25 -131N-R2219 N8 _f n 0 C) 6 umt `' "10 �I A wnn__ •w ` - n 01 �!0 co Z (4 .m a I \ 0 rn S cn o Sn (1] Z n 0 'I Z r N •�V N 8 • • A . CLEARWATER CREEK 4TH ADDITION _5. _ O Y LINO LAKES ANOKA, •' "� T.31N-R22WAh N -R22W 23° 6g �ki1/ --.0:'60°.` ��SAg \ . �� ` °y 7--M A TCH L I N E +' A JJ MATCH LINE J'A ", N6256•' S1 \0 ,1 \\ q� \\ • o ( (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) 0 - (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) 2 / /'\ Z \°, J \ �N 111 / \ / / - o ° - :, I \� - - 1 m 553.00 • o- u -�� .• S89 °39'53 "E GRAPHIC SCALE ", 7? Reio to' q / ^\� al% ` \ o ssfi076SJ� 20.00• = , o m3.46 rz1.44 a4.19 0 86.84 1a.os p • .4 + �. / «,Js 58.7 F---??.•39 289.88 _72.J G•d5 •3r 3'4'24 /`\ \ // I t a,rsa fk,.W.,� I��w•3Q 00 /� D.00• - N880'?O'W 140.1{ 17�<Oi I � I Ir / /%- '7 _ %• 1 ��I MN MI MO 4 / V, I I 4.13'47'24'7 rM/3.47'24•� \ ' ' \ \Z 4 .4 / '14°, - 3176_1 ,3'-';'''' N99 ?0'O5�- IR 30 1 JD I Im 1 , I / / / / / / / /01\ / t• \ I-' \ <, / i \. ,• ay I. h I it 1 // 1/ // SCALE DI feet 1' Mq° I 1 \ 11 \ a.' \d s/, / 2 ----,/ 127.88 l n o h wl / / / / 1 inch = 60 feet :; C1 •5 :"I 1 1 • 1 'a \ \o `t'j . / 4. i .44 I o�N wla IW m •3 / / 'G ' i �h 8 . , l • 11 ate\ \ , h tip , ? '\ , Q 1\ t Oil?? 8 I'' 9 I ,:11 l;.° 10 'n / / / / / / �!� ` 1 u 5 -rn\ f `� /' / 4•Am h / a,. 1 1� ^ = N 'i pl I� r`/ /4y / DRAINAGE AND UDUTY EASEMENTS ARE • - <� v,\ NI 4 r o \„ 0 m' tl/� SHOWN THUS: , 1 1...n., M :,`,1 =' n V i1 0 \ m / / ry '+ hl., �1. f"� n I 1 �'+f/ /1 q/ BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT \ � • 1� \,�'�"'"'NA ANp 2/ / '�' �.1 1"` \ \-� / / `• ' / /r Iw ,N I y0\ 12 I- h/ /` 1 1 ;.4 , l l Q nr+,UnuTY EASELIENTI \ \ / ,,, -.7-t' / Q'+ H o \ Iz l I / ♦ /r 3 / / LINES. OF- 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING 1\+ 1 n, / $ 1 \ j ry •11t7D + S77• �I h . 10 / h/ q' RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE 2 - I I 2 \ I... , j w , , • = 577-3... I �l p'$ •' t• d_J6'27'45' _ - Ld°f 5_07'35'- JI 1 / / 2�/ /,y YO/ / 'Q� SHOWN 014 THE PLAT. `�14. Y_/J9V • J l _ _ IN - - y7 _ r , 1J3. 04 79.2! L a`4• / / /j / /� I I y�VV b4' , S7 - \ 40 / _5 4 E • '1 1 / •, 74 • _ _ J • "'`j N ' , • 6 f O, / l 1 .Ci •1 1 m E-9 36 µ 97,..,. „ J i J t Zp Q,' /•ry 65 _ .l C h 7 BS�� /// / / y�/ /rye Oh i I �/ - -_ J59l0 • /0400: _ D ∎ N71 mf 1+� I \mil M.S40_�� -may6• 1 L� `a• / / \ _ • I 106.15 • n' i p'+ /4 / ti ‘;'/ 1 ?245• �� 1 V +� • \ - r. g / / / �j N Toy \'l S- \ 1 ^5250 • h N8849'48E =� 11 / w - /,. /Zh 1 m 1 31 E, Rz500.Op 143.66 - ._ - 4.M4'29� - -- .( \r�. ♦CQ/ / / 1J "'SIN 1 1 h'h / \ ' I 1 -1 taI 1g i a V /. • /�•,' � � � � •d. I I ?096 - <7 B° \\`�j� / / / t. \ to•, 11 Ito O'ry \I 4/.55.09 I'k J L1! - -- H,\.\\ S. -' r ! � ./\ \ 11 12 / / \ s Ioti \i s I I I 4N7� ?9 y ti ,r. ,i' \ /// v/ I' I h." q/ _` - 1 2 I I 9s *o \ 9''JS \B' l l ' Lv l �� 1 \\ rm. 1 1 / /gI 3 I I / y ry ° I o 1 \ \/ ``« Ci b• // \ ..i t7,1'°`3. `G. 1 1 \ ///95 I 12V j �. m/, 7 01 ^n = 8 I • \s ?o I e • ' \ t . \10 °: WI .o JO• / / 1' `Iw 1 + / r ‘.0.,...,-,4, 0 : d"4:Ta4 '� "i i/ • �n / rj/ N!T -I 18 JJ 3 �\ T'S5_J 1 / / K / / Co' p// 7- 1N y Ih \ JQ• 106 28 0 - --+- 1 • < `11 1` 5. r \ ' 'II. \n \ 7. / / 6 ;'o i 7` Y" R ' $ h / /l: \� O0\ 91.29 ._. o43 \ \ N ,..NI \ go:t9 s mss. / ...„.<01;.' B NII ,/ 1 I 1 s• ,....,e, I� I Is 5 6/ /g�,w J . , Loa A / / \\ \4. w 81,_^ O5) • 0.00 •,,...„-de.......--, / Y15g /''/v1 ' .7 z l II I!• \0/ / mryn .7 r�J\ ? ?�,` 'T I o ••_ 'y s. Z� k'? /5 VQ , / N76 �� I I,°� SO/ / ,� "6-' l "1 q/ • I J . `%. , _ N - 0 1 >\• J o I / /\ J 9• - 589 43'20 1 b \� �,00. C4 / \\ \•� le Qi.• �/ O�,oY� X77 N, _ J/0 I n �"�/ "f'Ory •/ �\ 7a. J Z _ - rz4.2s ,. .'4 - + /,Q.1 'iJ\ .....fr. L 40 \�, 13 .,1,/ h4.$'/ 5899 • 'B? I L / / / / a, ?z • I 1 v ' , ° 4,4::q;°.„:: \ I •N -eggs2 _ _ o..Id. a°/ /4 ' `, sj5: , o' k / 4 •4,/ / s'8• _7B ` 9 \ ' \ I r\ 1 8129 .46'H. . S,5i 4i '01 c: +P1i` i 'r '3J'J e Z / 9129 C4t ?3 / / J0 j i;:'' / .T'- \ , 'b '4�J / d 1 ' / / ' , J it _ �4boy / i l j / / . / �c rQi ?J . ! 12 / o / I I N. _ o ? J r. •A••,. I �p5 0 q; -' 46.22 ,y W \ / J q ' , I or. \4r* / / 3 .41 'z'.., F� 1 ts,V 4-s£, 4 \ `6$ :,•.'s• o,, \ � �l /} / 07j %6 C / M _ • J� \ / I I Sx.TS -TJIN RTTW g -4,.....e. } J • 1 I q 9 'L , 9 B' z6J • J / / - L. / '9 / H ,- 0 J• \, \ --- -- , 1 h .\ 0\ /,9 9•SS . / -South Lino of N£I /4 -5E1 4 t.' / 'fir \ \ / / / /F y,l Im .., .pq,p• 3- 7- 7J17'W ,•` b,,, / �Ier -� - / --- -- - - - - -- 1` S.o.TS -TJIN -R22W ---- - - - -- '' - - - -- - - -- -- J� °o7,` z 4/ / /b �I I� 1 F� -- 14 - \ q - I 2 - -- t •- \ / / I t .T.,p000 :.,\ / 55 hh • I �1 /\ \ M1 /�\ . :3,s / h y I o -2 ' -- -- / 41/ Y` 1' cr,ao' � o\' 61- \ °j .c.vAi . ‘,.oh \ \ \�� i ;' \� n: JJ I per- i \\ I / it I 1 I , ' • , , >r'o • 3.216, DYE pp... 0a y 1i,►5 \ \,. 4,. ; , i J� P ti I a.-q� �\ / I I ` / - 'Or•,;' 0' \ e3 / \0 f', \S 0/' ' p \ 1 • ' 6 I J \ / / o 4 / �. /z: X00 ' a /+L 1 d t \ \c p p J y / , I \ / L 1 ' 059.-03 o k - I V \ `r /T ' r 4•r ' l i i -South Um( of N.1J95 \ J / I I Is N ' ya 0� / 61 0, 1 /'\ 0 1 �'\ \ \ \ y4,`q• , a ." �ry F .t of E1/2-SEI /4 . L -1 L J N ' ` -5 \ / i' Z 1( ``� 7 \ 1/ \ • ' c: S.cTS =TJ,N -R22W I - - _ 113.54 11824 a .� ,, / 1. V,,/53.2,4p W '13i 1° \ y \ �pA. :'� i I T ��.0 -- / R42)A. ' Ok W \ u, VtN C\ \565,2z • 1 i /1 °•4\ \\ \y`,ty 1 5 i ` !-BS \` O 4, , 1 I �i 0: \ N89:79'SJ'W • 231.78 >.W !�1'j 64 \ \� �^'o �'•13�/ �,°T \ \'E> /0 1J: tea. 1 j o .1 -. _� a -i g °732 r \ .. \•S. /w �, o� \ , ' u I 1 aiD' / � • `� \o , ,r4 \ \ / 9 ►5 1 , , J I t c. I s �1 5623_ / / J \ a \ \ \• ,ar I / r - 1 / _ I -' t'-,._ V1'u`1 JJ ...46 \�.'1 o`\ -' \ , • 1 3, ' �- h' I - '.W E 1 ___� AND 1 u 1 , 1 001 L/ // \ `$ ~•G ` 1� i /// \� / ../ `' ?, \♦ .'"- � y I o -- 1 2 (/�7 �, �.\ /\oh. oyti ll 0 U T L 0 T C W ml 1 1 14d� / / / \\� yo i i u ,c .I `/ I t 3_2/ J/ �N `'oily. ,33\1 • I I , .. o • 1 '6 \a 1 e3_- W 101 J� / / \T�p9 c��\ X32 °5 1'S4W F' Z I 1 •2 1 �` I-- p'°id j 1 L„• �N$ 3 /,I�„ I � O U T L 0 T B 1 1 ' a !-.�i. ,v hiv F j ORA,NACf AND U72/TT EASEMENT a,, ..% \1+• \'q .yq \ �-g„� 1 i OVER ALL OF JlLOT 8 \ 7 2-1...§ 1 1 _ \ ■ tgPII, T ` '1JJ/ <, • sa= 11 1 \ \ • 'N..%-.4}. 4 `'+\ \\ 3_N ( / N e, \ /'' /' J "- - q4' W 1 Ne i / RECEIVED / r 1 ' i I 1 ,• I i' '; // /'f _ , / L' ' / ; // AUG 0 8 2000. NOTES: = " ' ` _ `378 s E _ 0. 0. . ` i , /1 O - DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH L ' Al a o 1 ` ' LAKES . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED A T �- •t �, , C17Y OF�1� WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED C H "i `\ , RCS 10947 r S e E ` ` 1\ 11 ' P • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND S H C • \ \ _ _ _ _ ' i \ I. E E T 9'22-1-4 \ Vi �./ • - DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT s 0 N E _ _ _ N • t FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE MIDWEST /° 4 ++ °,°. ■ \\ / / NORTH LANE OF THE NORTHEAST OUART£R $ h. B ++ ..;";.17'a \ /_ _ OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. E E 7 - \ SEC.23 -TJ1N -R22W IS ASSUMED TO 's� , ■ HAVE A BEARING OF N89•39•53`W. _ • 589'43'20"E 518.57 • T / O \x� -East Line of SW1 /4 -SE1 /4 \ / i 5..25-T31N -R22W No072.55 E 1 _ _ - 1008.14 - —f- 1325.59 NO'O72.55E f / -Eost Lin of NWf/4- SEI /4/ ,./44; Sec25 -1'51N -R22W /IV - % NO07235_E _ _ / -Best Lino of NL7 /, -SEf /� Sx.25 -T31N -R22W `J94B • 7.37 `i ,t0/ 30f4W vlr � \ °! NO075 09 E o 123.73 )' .1f•,of.r�,1z1. 0y O k? / 1 fo1 d.13g9��i ,N l_— ti /N0072.55ET4t,55-z- N / 1z7 1 CA / / I co pi 4'119' 4-Z5 s f1- (1'711 1741.63 S133HS tP 3O t' 133HS • • S3)4tf1 ONIl JO )..L13 0 0� ° s 11 g acl N 3.1..— Co w o s iE • N00° 12'55"E. r T -t 1 � 1 45 i` b , w �a o 4ti .0 ,4 45 09 6 S�ti �0 ''' 0l 5 °.V 9L..... ,...1. s 0 y��4 �°�`rD 59,1. �g�b!0 °� °o e \ ; \ .0�ylryt AAV ' - \ A00 T1 ` -/ - - `a 2 ti0 1 ' 1 '% 1 1 / n,',- • ,' y Cr i 6 1 \ \ 1s , d° ;' O ‘a O'O w s% ^)' V �_ •) /- Eost Line of SWI /4 -5E1/4 317.15 1 Sec.25 -T0IN -R22W - N0072.55'E 1008.44 - r N0072'SSE .I 132559 - - - - _y - -- West Lino of SEI /4 -SEI /4 r Soc.25- TJIN -R22W °o. � -i 3..LL`08£OSS�p °S p O. • o. c�— T 1/1 • • - r r r r r r r 0 A \ L2 4 a )s\ 4 -•\ O M N00° 16'40 "E , -East Lino of SE1 /4 -SE1 /4 \ 5e0.25- TJIN -R22W 7154.53 \ • 1741.63 0 ?JL2LL 6'�112I6'37.9 A70I,LIQQ6'